Selected messages in Nova-Roma group. Nov 6-11, 2007

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52163 From: David Kling (Modianus) Date: 2007-11-06
Subject: Re: Comitia Plebis Tributa election process still not working !
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52164 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2007-11-06
Subject: Re: Comitia Plebis Tributa election process still not working !
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52165 From: iulius sabinus Date: 2007-11-06
Subject: Re: Comitia Plebis Tributa election process still not working !
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52166 From: M. Lucretius Agricola Date: 2007-11-06
Subject: Re: Comitia Plebis Tributa election process still not working !
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52167 From: pompeia_minucia_tiberia Date: 2007-11-06
Subject: Re: Comitia Plebis Tributa election process still not working !
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52168 From: David Kling (Modianus) Date: 2007-11-06
Subject: Re: Comitia Plebis Tributa election process still not working !
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52169 From: Titus Iulius Sabinus Date: 2007-11-06
Subject: Re: Comitia Plebis Tributa election process working !
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52170 From: Maior Date: 2007-11-06
Subject: Re: Comitia Plebis Tributa election process still not working !
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52171 From: Titus Iulius Sabinus Date: 2007-11-06
Subject: Edictum VII - Provincial administration appointment.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52172 From: marcushoratius Date: 2007-11-06
Subject: a. d. VII Eidus Novembris
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52173 From: Stephen Gallagher Date: 2007-11-06
Subject: The Centuria Praerogativa and the Presidium
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52174 From: marcushoratius Date: 2007-11-06
Subject: Re: auspices
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52175 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2007-11-06
Subject: Iamdudum petasum ieci
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52176 From: Ice Hunter Date: 2007-11-07
Subject: Re: The LEX GALERIA DE PRIVATIS REBUS debate
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52177 From: David Kling (Modianus) Date: 2007-11-07
Subject: Re: Comitia Plebis Tributa election process working !
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52178 From: David Kling (Modianus) Date: 2007-11-07
Subject: Re: The Centuria Praerogativa and the Presidium
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52179 From: David Kling (Modianus) Date: 2007-11-07
Subject: Re: Iamdudum petasum ieci
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52180 From: Maior Date: 2007-11-07
Subject: Re: auspices
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52181 From: Titus Flavius Aquila Date: 2007-11-07
Subject: AW: [Nova-Roma] Re: Julian the Blessed [was a. d. VIII Eidus Novembr
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52182 From: Q. Caecilius Metellus Date: 2007-11-07
Subject: Re: To Begin the Ludi Plebeii
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52183 From: marcushoratius Date: 2007-11-07
Subject: The Coming Year
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52184 From: titus.aquila Date: 2007-11-07
Subject: Re: The Coming Year
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52185 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2007-11-07
Subject: Re: praeturae petitio alius
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52186 From: David Kling (Modianus) Date: 2007-11-07
Subject: Re: The Coming Year
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52187 From: Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus Date: 2007-11-07
Subject: Re: The Coming Year
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52188 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2007-11-07
Subject: Re: The Coming Year
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52189 From: marcushoratius Date: 2007-11-07
Subject: Re: auspices
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52190 From: marcushoratius Date: 2007-11-07
Subject: Re: The Coming Year
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52191 From: C•ARMINIVS•RECCANELLVS Date: 2007-11-07
Subject: Changing name
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52192 From: James Lee Mathews Date: 2007-11-07
Subject: Flavours, Sweet -- Roman Times -- 3rd Qtr. -- 2007
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52193 From: James Lee Mathews Date: 2007-11-07
Subject: The Wine Revel -- "Roman Times" -- 3rd Qtr. -- 2007
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52194 From: James Lee Mathews Date: 2007-11-07
Subject: The Roman Turnip -- "Roman Times" -- 3rd Qtr. -- 2007
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52195 From: James Lee Mathews Date: 2007-11-07
Subject: Hymn To Vesta -- "Roman Times" -- 3rd Qtr. -- 2007
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52196 From: James Lee Mathews Date: 2007-11-07
Subject: Book Report -- Greek and Roman Maps -- "Pilum" -- 3rd Qtr. -- 2007
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52197 From: James Lee Mathews Date: 2007-11-07
Subject: "The Goddess" -- "Pilum" -- 3rd Qtr. -- 2007
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52198 From: James Mathews Date: 2007-11-07
Subject: "Roman Times" / "Pilum" -- 3rd Qtr. --2007
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52199 From: Titus Iulius Sabinus Date: 2007-11-07
Subject: Re: The Coming Year
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52200 From: Titus Iulius Sabinus Date: 2007-11-07
Subject: Re: The Coming Year
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52201 From: M·CVR·COMPLVTENSIS Date: 2007-11-07
Subject: Provincia Hispania - Edictum Propraetoricium LII (Complutensis XXVI)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52202 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2007-11-07
Subject: Re: Changing name
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52203 From: Bruno Cantermi Date: 2007-11-07
Subject: Re: How To Vote
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52204 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2007-11-07
Subject: Re: How To Vote
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52205 From: M Arminius Maior Date: 2007-11-07
Subject: Re: The Centuria Praerogativa and the Presidium
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52206 From: Bruno Cantermi Date: 2007-11-07
Subject: Re: Flavours, Sweet -- Roman Times -- 3rd Qtr. -- 2007
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52207 From: Bruno Cantermi Date: 2007-11-07
Subject: Re: How To Vote
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52208 From: PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@aol.com Date: 2007-11-07
Subject: Re: auspices
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52209 From: PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@aol.com Date: 2007-11-07
Subject: Re: praeturae petitio alius
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52210 From: pompeia_minucia_tiberia Date: 2007-11-07
Subject: Re: Iamdudum petasum ieci
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52211 From: marcushoratius Date: 2007-11-07
Subject: Re: auspices
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52212 From: marcushoratius Date: 2007-11-07
Subject: a. d. VI Eidus Novembris
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52213 From: pompeia_minucia_tiberia Date: 2007-11-07
Subject: Re: auspices
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52214 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2007-11-07
Subject: Re: praeturae petitio alius
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52215 From: C. Curius Saturninus Date: 2007-11-07
Subject: LUDI PLEBEII TODAY
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52216 From: C. Curius Saturninus Date: 2007-11-07
Subject: Re: Digest Number 3651
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52217 From: Maior Date: 2007-11-07
Subject: Re: auspices
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52218 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2007-11-07
Subject: Re: Iamdudum petasum ieci
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52219 From: vallenporter Date: 2007-11-08
Subject: Re: auspices
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52220 From: titus.aquila Date: 2007-11-08
Subject: Re: The Coming Year
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52221 From: titus.aquila Date: 2007-11-08
Subject: The coming year , the 10th year of Nova Roma
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52222 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2007-11-08
Subject: Magistratuum munera convenientiaque petitorum
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52223 From: GAIVS IVLIANVS Date: 2007-11-08
Subject: Wanting contact from Marcvs Cassivs Ivlianvs!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52224 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2007-11-08
Subject: Re: Wanting contact from Marcvs Cassivs Ivlianvs!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52225 From: Sebastian José Molina Palacios Date: 2007-11-08
Subject: Re: praeturae petitio alius
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52226 From: David Kling (Modianus) Date: 2007-11-08
Subject: Re: Wanting contact from Marcvs Cassivs Ivlianvs!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52227 From: Annia Minucia Marcella Date: 2007-11-08
Subject: Re: Wanting contact from Marcvs Cassivs Ivlianvs!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52228 From: Caius Aemilius Crassus Date: 2007-11-08
Subject: Missing one candidate for Curule Aedile in the Election Page.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52229 From: Publius Memmius Albucius Date: 2007-11-08
Subject: Re: Missing one candidate for Curule Aedile in the Election Page (NO
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52230 From: Caius Aemilius Crassus Date: 2007-11-08
Subject: Small mistake in the cista of Comitia Populi Tributa.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52231 From: Caius Aemilius Crassus Date: 2007-11-08
Subject: Re: Missing one candidate for Curule Aedile in the Election Page (NO
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52232 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2007-11-08
Subject: Attention Voters
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52233 From: Caius Aemilius Crassus Date: 2007-11-08
Subject: Missing the Curulis Aedilis in the Cista of the Comitia Populi Tribu
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52234 From: marcushoratius Date: 2007-11-08
Subject: Re: auspices
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52235 From: PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@aol.com Date: 2007-11-08
Subject: Re: auspices
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52236 From: Caius Aemilius Crassus Date: 2007-11-08
Subject: Cista of Comitia Populi Tributa.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52237 From: Publius Memmius Albucius Date: 2007-11-08
Subject: Cista of Comitia Populi Tributa : INVALID ?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52238 From: Patrick D. Owen Date: 2007-11-08
Subject: Articles: Originating Gentes of Rome & History of the Gens Galeria
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52239 From: pompeia_minucia_tiberia Date: 2007-11-08
Subject: Re: Cista of Comitia Populi Tributa : INVALID ?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52240 From: liviacases Date: 2007-11-08
Subject: Re: praeturae petitio alius
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52241 From: Stephen Gallagher Date: 2007-11-08
Subject: Sextus Lucillius Tutor name is removed from the ballot.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52242 From: pompeia_minucia_tiberia Date: 2007-11-08
Subject: Re: auspices
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52243 From: marcushoratius Date: 2007-11-08
Subject: a. d. V Eidus Novembris
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52244 From: marcushoratius Date: 2007-11-08
Subject: Re: auspices
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52245 From: Publius Memmius Albucius Date: 2007-11-09
Subject: URGENT : Question to DIRIBITORES and CUSTODES
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52246 From: Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus Date: 2007-11-09
Subject: Re: De rogatoribus - Proposed Law
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52247 From: pompeia_minucia_tiberia Date: 2007-11-09
Subject: Re: URGENT : Question to DIRIBITORES and CUSTODES
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52248 From: Publius Memmius Albucius Date: 2007-11-09
Subject: Re: URGENT : Question to DIRIBITORES and CUSTODES
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52249 From: GAIVS IVLIANVS Date: 2007-11-09
Subject: Needing a Toga made!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52250 From: pompeia_minucia_tiberia Date: 2007-11-09
Subject: Re: URGENT : Question to DIRIBITORES and CUSTODES
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52251 From: pompeia_minucia_tiberia Date: 2007-11-09
Subject: Re: Needing a Toga made!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52252 From: Pompeia Minucia Strabo Date: 2007-11-09
Subject: Custos Announcement - Century Praerogativa Privilege Expired
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52253 From: C. Curius Saturninus Date: 2007-11-09
Subject: LUDI PLEBEII LITERARY CONTEST
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52254 From: Marcus Iulius Severus Date: 2007-11-09
Subject: FIRST CLASS CENTURIES?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52255 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2007-11-09
Subject: Re: FIRST CLASS CENTURIES?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52256 From: Marcus Iulius Severus Date: 2007-11-09
Subject: WELL... THANKS, MARINVS
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52257 From: Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus Date: 2007-11-09
Subject: Re: FIRST CLASS CENTURIES?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52258 From: Inigo Fernandez Date: 2007-11-09
Subject: Re: Custos Announcement - Century Praerogativa Privilege Expired
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52259 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2007-11-09
Subject: Re: FIRST CLASS CENTURIES?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52260 From: pompeia_minucia_tiberia Date: 2007-11-09
Subject: Re: Custos Announcement - Century Praerogativa Privilege Expired
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52261 From: Publius Memmius Albucius Date: 2007-11-09
Subject: Re: FIRST CLASS CENTURIES?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52262 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2007-11-09
Subject: Answers to all your questions
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52263 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2007-11-09
Subject: Re: FIRST CLASS CENTURIES?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52264 From: Lucius Rutilius Minervalis Date: 2007-11-09
Subject: Re: FIRST CLASS CENTURIES?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52265 From: pompeia_minucia_tiberia Date: 2007-11-09
Subject: Sensationalism
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52266 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2007-11-09
Subject: Re: Sensationalism
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52267 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2007-11-09
Subject: De centuriis: Re: [Nova-Roma] Sensationalism
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52268 From: David Kling (Modianus) Date: 2007-11-09
Subject: Re: FIRST CLASS CENTURIES?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52269 From: Pompeia Minucia Strabo Date: 2007-11-09
Subject: Edictum Custos Suffragia Comitia Populi Tributa et Comitia Centuriat
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52270 From: David Kling (Modianus) Date: 2007-11-09
Subject: Re: Edictum Custos Suffragia Comitia Populi Tributa et Comitia Centu
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52271 From: Stephen Gallagher Date: 2007-11-09
Subject: EDICTUM CONSULARE XXIII-MMDCCLX A.U.C
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52272 From: Pompeia Minucia Strabo Date: 2007-11-09
Subject: Fwd: Edictum Custos Suffragia Comitia Populi Tributa et Comitia Cen
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52273 From: marcushoratius Date: 2007-11-09
Subject: a. d. IIII Eidus Novembris
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52274 From: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com Date: 2007-11-10
Subject: Election Information, 11/11/2007, 12:15 am
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52275 From: C. Curius Saturninus Date: 2007-11-10
Subject: LUDI PLEBEII MUNERA GLADIATORIA
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52276 From: M·CVR·COMPLVTENSIS Date: 2007-11-10
Subject: Comitia Plebis: MEMENTO
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52277 From: Stephen Gallagher Date: 2007-11-10
Subject: Any more candidates?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52278 From: Maior Date: 2007-11-10
Subject: Re: Comitia Plebis: MEMENTO
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52279 From: QFabiusMaxmi@aol.com Date: 2007-11-10
Subject: Re: Any more candidates? Fabius Maximus -Quaestor
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52280 From: Maior Date: 2007-11-10
Subject: Re: Comitia Plebis: MEMENTO
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52281 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2007-11-10
Subject: Re: Comitia Plebis: MEMENTO
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52282 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2007-11-10
Subject: Re: Any more candidates? Fabius Maximus -Quaestor
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52283 From: M·CVR·COMPLVTENSIS Date: 2007-11-10
Subject: Re: Comitia Plebis: MEMENTO
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52284 From: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com Date: 2007-11-10
Subject: Election Information, 11/11/2007, 12:15 am
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52285 From: L. Salix Date: 2007-11-10
Subject: Re: Any more candidates?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52286 From: Stephen Gallagher Date: 2007-11-10
Subject: The Comitia Populi Tributa is called
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52287 From: Stephen Gallagher Date: 2007-11-10
Subject: The Comitia Centuriata is called
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52288 From: marcushoratius Date: 2007-11-10
Subject: a. d. III Eidus Novembris
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52289 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2007-11-10
Subject: Re: The Comitia Populi Tributa is called
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52290 From: Stephen Gallagher Date: 2007-11-10
Subject: LEX GALERIA DE CURSU HONORUM
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52291 From: M. Lucretius Agricola Date: 2007-11-11
Subject: Re: The Comitia Populi Tributa is called
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52292 From: C. Curius Saturninus Date: 2007-11-11
Subject: LUDI PLEBEII ART CONTEST!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52293 From: Svm Stoicus Date: 2007-11-11
Subject: my candidacy
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52294 From: Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus Date: 2007-11-11
Subject: AGAINST the LEX GALERIA DE CURSU HONORUM - and a suggestion
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52295 From: L. Vitellius Triarius Date: 2007-11-11
Subject: Re: Any more candidates? Fabius Maximus -Quaestor
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52296 From: L. Vitellius Triarius Date: 2007-11-11
Subject: Re: AGAINST the LEX GALERIA DE CURSU HONORUM - and a suggestion
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52297 From: Stephen Gallagher Date: 2007-11-11
Subject: FOR the LEX GALERIA DE CURSU HONORUM
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52298 From: A. Apollonius Cordus Date: 2007-11-11
Subject: Re: Questions for the non candidates
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52299 From: A. Apollonius Cordus Date: 2007-11-11
Subject: De Smith (ERAT: auspices)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52300 From: M·CVR·COMPLVTENSIS Date: 2007-11-11
Subject: Re: The Comitia Populi Tributa is called
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52301 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2007-11-11
Subject: Re: The Comitia Populi Tributa is called
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52302 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2007-11-11
Subject: Conditional Declaration for Curule Aedile
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52303 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2007-11-11
Subject: Re: my candidacy
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52304 From: Stephen Gallagher Date: 2007-11-11
Subject: Candidacy for Curule Aediles
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52305 From: marcushoratius Date: 2007-11-11
Subject: Re: AGAINST the LEX GALERIA DE CURSU HONORUM - and a suggestion
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52306 From: Pompeia Minucia Strabo Date: 2007-11-11
Subject: Voting Still...in the Canceled Elections
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52307 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2007-11-11
Subject: Re: Candidacy for Curule Aediles
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52308 From: marcushoratius Date: 2007-11-11
Subject: Re: my candidacy
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52309 From: PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@aol.com Date: 2007-11-11
Subject: Re: Custos Announcement - Century Praerogativa Privilege Expired
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52310 From: Stephen Gallagher Date: 2007-11-11
Subject: The Cursus Honorum is not a myth
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52311 From: Jorge Lescano Date: 2007-11-11
Subject: Candidacy for Quaestor
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52312 From: PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@aol.com Date: 2007-11-11
Subject: Re: EDICTUM CONSULARE XXIII-MMDCCLX A.U.C: Intercession by FGA
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52313 From: Lucius Rutilius Minervalis Date: 2007-11-11
Subject: Re: Questions for the non candidates
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52314 From: M·CVR·COMPLVTENSIS Date: 2007-11-11
Subject: Re: The Comitia Populi Tributa is called
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52315 From: marcushoratius Date: 2007-11-11
Subject: Re: The Cursus Honorum is a myth
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52316 From: Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus Date: 2007-11-11
Subject: Cn. Cornelius Lentulus for Quaestor
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52317 From: Sebastian José Molina Palacios Date: 2007-11-11
Subject: Re: praeturae petitio alius
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52318 From: M·CVR·COMPLVTENSIS Date: 2007-11-11
Subject: Re: AGAINST the LEX GALERIA DE CURSU HONORUM - and a suggestion
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52319 From: Tiberius Galerius Paulinus Date: 2007-11-11
Subject: Intercessio on Edict XXIII
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52320 From: David Kling (Modianus) Date: 2007-11-11
Subject: From Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus -- Censor
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52321 From: C·ARMINIVS·RECCANELLVS Date: 2007-11-11
Subject: Re: LUDI PLEBEII MUNERA GLADIATORIA
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52322 From: Caeso Fabius Buteo Quintilianus Date: 2007-11-11
Subject: Get rid of sequential voting
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52323 From: Dana-Cooper Date: 2007-11-11
Subject: To US Veterans
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52324 From: Maior Date: 2007-11-11
Subject: Re: Questions for the non candidates & a Candidate responds
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52325 From: Annia Minucia Marcella Date: 2007-11-11
Subject: Re: To US Veterans
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52326 From: Maior Date: 2007-11-11
Subject: Re: To US Veterans
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52327 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2007-11-11
Subject: Re: To US Veterans
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52328 From: Ice Hunter Date: 2007-11-11
Subject: Re: To US Veterans
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52329 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2007-11-11
Subject: Re: To US Veterans
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52330 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2007-11-11
Subject: Re: To US Veterans
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52331 From: Charlie Collins Date: 2007-11-11
Subject: Re: To US Veterans
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52332 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2007-11-11
Subject: Re: To US Veterans
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52333 From: David Kling (Modianus) Date: 2007-11-11
Subject: Re: To US Veterans
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52334 From: pompeia_minucia_tiberia Date: 2007-11-11
Subject: Lest We Forget
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52335 From: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com Date: 2007-11-11
Subject: Election Information, 11/12/2007, 12:15 am
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52336 From: pompeia_minucia_tiberia Date: 2007-11-11
Subject: Re: The Comitia Populi Tributa is called
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52337 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2007-11-11
Subject: Re: Revising the voting procedure in the Comitia Centuriata
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52338 From: pompeia_minucia_tiberia Date: 2007-11-11
Subject: Re: Revising the voting procedure in the Comitia Centuriata



Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52163 From: David Kling (Modianus) Date: 2007-11-06
Subject: Re: Comitia Plebis Tributa election process still not working !
Salvete:

Agricola makes a very good point. It is important NOT to assume that
everyone, especially the webmaster, reads the Nova Roma main list and
the NR Announce list. A courtesy e-mail never hurts :)

Valete:

Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus

On Nov 6, 2007 6:34 PM, M. Lucretius Agricola <wm_hogue@...> wrote:
>
> Salvete
>
> I think it would be great if the magistrate who calls an election
> would contact the webmaster directly prior to the election to see that
> the opening and closing has been scheduled. The opening and closing of
> the cista can be set to happen automatically. The people who do this
> job are as busy as anyone else. A simple e-mail a few days or even a
> week in advance would confirm that all is ready.
>
> optime valete
>
> Agricola
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52164 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2007-11-06
Subject: Re: Comitia Plebis Tributa election process still not working !
Salve Agricola,

"M. Lucretius Agricola" <wm_hogue@...> writes:

> Salvete
>
> I think it would be great if the magistrate who calls an election
> would contact the webmaster directly prior to the election to see that
> the opening and closing has been scheduled.

Do you mean to say it wasn't?

I obviously don't know whether it was this time or not, but I do know
that during my own consulship I made many efforts to insure that
elections would go smoothly. It does take a fair amount of
coordination among many people.

Vale,

CN-EQVIT-MARINVS
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52165 From: iulius sabinus Date: 2007-11-06
Subject: Re: Comitia Plebis Tributa election process still not working !
SALVETE!

These are exactly some things I want to resolve if elected consul. People who worked with me know I'm very attentive to details.
It's good choice as magistrates to keep in touch to avoid these problems. It's polite to help each over as time as we have a common interest: to preserve, to correct and to move on.

VALETE,
IVL SABINVS
Candidate for consul:

http://tinyurl.com.au/x.php?abe

"M. Lucretius Agricola" <wm_hogue@...> wrote:

Salvete

I think it would be great if the magistrate who calls an election
would contact the webmaster directly prior to the election to see that
the opening and closing has been scheduled. The opening and closing of
the cista can be set to happen automatically. The people who do this
job are as busy as anyone else. A simple e-mail a few days or even a
week in advance would confirm that all is ready.

optime valete

Agricola

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "David Kling (Modianus)"
<tau.athanasios@...> wrote:
>
> Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus T. Flavio Aquilae salutem dicit
>
> If we had a plebeian magistrate who was capable of doing the necessary
> web/technical work needed to establish the cista then I think that
> would be a great idea.
>
> Vale:
>
> Caeso Buteo
>
> On Nov 6, 2007 8:51 AM, titus.aquila <titus.aquila@...> wrote:
> >
> > T.Flavius Aquila Caesoni Fabio Buteoni Modiano salutem plurimam dicit
> >
> > Plurimas gratias tibi ago !
> >
> > I understand that we are an international community, widespread, but
> > still it should be possible to start elections in time.
> >
> > Maybe the Tribunus Plebis will need to take over this function in the
> > near future to start elections for the Comitia Plebis Tributa.
> >
> > It is a shame to keep the citizens waiting, to cast their votes for
> > the Plebeian offices.
> >
> > Vale optime
> >
> >
> > Titus Flavius Aquila
> > Scriba Censoris GFBM
> > Tribunus Plebis Candidatus
>






"Every individual is the architect of his own fortune" - Appius Claudius




__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52166 From: M. Lucretius Agricola Date: 2007-11-06
Subject: Re: Comitia Plebis Tributa election process still not working !
--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Gnaeus Equitius Marinus <gawne@...>
wrote:
>
> Salve Agricola,
>
> "M. Lucretius Agricola" <wm_hogue@...> writes:
>
> > Salvete
> >
> > I think it would be great if the magistrate who calls an election
> > would contact the webmaster directly prior to the election to see that
> > the opening and closing has been scheduled.
>
> Do you mean to say it wasn't?

[SNIP]

Agricola Marino Sal,

Oh no, I have no idea about that. I was responding to the post that
said "If we had a plebeian magistrate who was capable of doing the
necessary web/technical work needed to establish the cista then I
think that would be a great idea."

I thought that I had left that message intact in my reply. I'm very
sorry if I deleted it and left my message without context. The only
thing that I meant to imply is that it might not be possible to find a
plebeian magistrate every year with the needed skills, and that if we
do have such a person the same situation could happen again anyway.
The important point is that the magistrate who calls the election
could contact the webmaster ahead of time so that if there seems to be
a doubt some appropriate action could be taken. I really have no idea
what happened this time and I am very sorry if I seemed to imply that
I did.

Optime vale
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52167 From: pompeia_minucia_tiberia Date: 2007-11-06
Subject: Re: Comitia Plebis Tributa election process still not working !
---Salve Agricola et Salvete Omnes:

Actually, when I called any comitia I would crosscopy the webmaster,
my colleague, the tribunes, and atleast one of the election staff so
they would be advised of my intentions. And I would make any
necessary communication to ensure that all systems were go from there.

To me it just makes sense, as we all have lives outside NR and busy
ones at that. This takes us away from being up to date on NR list
mails.

As Custos I dropped a mail to Octavius a couple of days ago to see if
I could help/ provide info for this cista, but he could well have
been off line for a couple of days and so didn't answer me, and if he
didn't get any initial notice of a comitia call, he wouldn't be
expecting to have to open a cista.

I'm not saying this to get a gold star :>), but in agreement that
simple communication is the key.

Valete

Pompeia


In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "M. Lucretius Agricola" <wm_hogue@...>
wrote:
>
> Salvete
>
> I think it would be great if the magistrate who calls an election
> would contact the webmaster directly prior to the election to see
that
> the opening and closing has been scheduled. The opening and closing
of
> the cista can be set to happen automatically. The people who do this
> job are as busy as anyone else. A simple e-mail a few days or even a
> week in advance would confirm that all is ready.
>
> optime valete
>
> Agricola
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "David Kling (Modianus)"
> <tau.athanasios@> wrote:
> >
> > Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus T. Flavio Aquilae salutem dicit
> >
> > If we had a plebeian magistrate who was capable of doing the
necessary
> > web/technical work needed to establish the cista then I think that
> > would be a great idea.
> >
> > Vale:
> >
> > Caeso Buteo
> >
> > On Nov 6, 2007 8:51 AM, titus.aquila <titus.aquila@> wrote:
> > >
> > > T.Flavius Aquila Caesoni Fabio Buteoni Modiano salutem
plurimam dicit
> > >
> > > Plurimas gratias tibi ago !
> > >
> > > I understand that we are an international community,
widespread, but
> > > still it should be possible to start elections in time.
> > >
> > > Maybe the Tribunus Plebis will need to take over this function
in the
> > > near future to start elections for the Comitia Plebis Tributa.
> > >
> > > It is a shame to keep the citizens waiting, to cast their
votes for
> > > the Plebeian offices.
> > >
> > > Vale optime
> > >
> > >
> > > Titus Flavius Aquila
> > > Scriba Censoris GFBM
> > > Tribunus Plebis Candidatus
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52168 From: David Kling (Modianus) Date: 2007-11-06
Subject: Re: Comitia Plebis Tributa election process still not working !
Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus Tito Iulio Sabino salutem dicit

This was one of the reasons I, as consul last year, created an e-mail
list for the magistrates of Nova Roma. So the magistrates would
communicate between each other and a record established of said
communication. Communication, and working together should be the norm
in Nova Roma -- but often it seems to be the exception. Hopefully, a
culture can be created to help facilitate a positive change.

Vale:

Caeso Buteo

On Nov 6, 2007 6:56 PM, iulius sabinus <iulius_sabinus@...> wrote:
>
>
> SALVETE!
>
> These are exactly some things I want to resolve if elected consul. People
> who worked with me know I'm very attentive to details.
> It's good choice as magistrates to keep in touch to avoid these problems.
> It's polite to help each over as time as we have a common interest: to
> preserve, to correct and to move on.
>
> VALETE,
> IVL SABINVS
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52169 From: Titus Iulius Sabinus Date: 2007-11-06
Subject: Re: Comitia Plebis Tributa election process working !
SALVE ET SALVETE!

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "David Kling (Modianus)"
<tau.athanasios@...> wrote:

> This was one of the reasons I, as consul last year, created an e-
mail list for the magistrates of Nova Roma.>>>

I know. As curule aedile I was member and the list works. If
magistrates really want to collaborate, this list, without doubts, was
and still can be useful.

VALE ET VALETE,
IVL SABINVS
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52170 From: Maior Date: 2007-11-06
Subject: Re: Comitia Plebis Tributa election process still not working !
Salve Pompeia;
now, for sure you're getting a gold star for that!
Marca Hortensia Maior
candidate for Censor
http://tinyurl.com/ysu2lv


As Custos I dropped a mail to Octavius a couple of days ago to see if
> I could help/ provide info for this cista, but he could well have
> been off line for a couple of days and so didn't answer me, and if
he
> didn't get any initial notice of a comitia call, he wouldn't be
> expecting to have to open a cista.
>
> I'm not saying this to get a gold star :>), but in agreement that
> simple communication is the key.
>
> Valete
>
> Pompeia
>
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52171 From: Titus Iulius Sabinus Date: 2007-11-06
Subject: Edictum VII - Provincial administration appointment.
EX OFFICIO LEGATUS PRO PRAETORE DACIA:

EDICTUM LEGATUS PRO PRAETORE VII - ABOUT PROVINCIAL ADMINISTRATION
APPOINTMENT.

Gaius Petronius Priscus is hereby appointed as scriba legatus pro
praetore.

This edict is effective imediately.

Hoc edictum statim valet.

Given under my hand this 7th day of November, 2760 a.U.c (7 November
2007).

Datum sub manu mea ante diem VII Id. Nov. MMDCCLX a.U.c,Lucio
Arminio Faustis et Tiberio Galerio Paulinis Consulibus.

T. Iulius Sabinus
Legatus Pro Praetore Dacia - Caput Trium Daciarum.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52172 From: marcushoratius Date: 2007-11-06
Subject: a. d. VII Eidus Novembris
M. Moravius Piscinus Horatianus Quiritibus et omnibus salutem
plurimam dicit: Di vos servavissent semper

Hodie est ante diem VII Eidus Novembris; haec dies comitialis est:


AUC 977 / 224 CE: Annals of the Fratres Arvales: Propitiatory Rites
After a Storm

"VII IDUS NOV the Fratres Arvales assembled in the Grove of the Dea
Dia on the Via Campana, at the fifth milestone, on the instruction of
magister Caius Porcius Priscus, and there they made sacrifice because
in a violent storm some trees in the sacred grove of Dea Dia were
struck by lightning and burnt; and in expiation for the uprooting of
those trees, striking them with iron and consuming them in fire, for
grinding down their remains and then for replacing them with others,
and for initiating the work and rebuilding altars for the occasion,
sacred to Dea Dia. In expiation for these things a purification
sacrifice was carried out with an offering of a suovetaurilia [mature
boar, ram, and bull]. Then in front of the temple cows, with their
horns bound in gold, were sacrificed to the Dea Dia, a total of two;
then at the altars built for the occasion sacrifices were made to the
Gods as listed: to Janus Pater two rams; to Jupiter two castrated
rams; to Mars Pater Ultor two rams; to the deity, male or female, two
castrated rams; to the juno of Dea Dia two sheep; to the Virgines
divae two sheep; to the Famuli divi two castrated rams; to the Lares
two sheep; to Fons two castrated rams; to Flora two sheep; to
Summanus Pater two black castrated rams; to Vesta MaterÂ…of the Gods
and Goddesses two sheep; likewise to Adolenda and Coinquenda two
sheep; and, before the Caesareum, to the genius of our lord, the
emperor Severus Alexander, a bull with gilded horns; likewise to the
twenty divi twenty castrated rams." ~ CIL 6, 2107, lines 2-13; ILS
5048

The offering to Summanus would indicate that the storm had come at
night. The reference to a deity, "male of female," is to the genius
loci of this sanctuary. Coinquenda is an indigitamentum for the
felling of trees and Adolenda for the burning of the trees. These
are indigitamenta for the clearing of a grove, and probably of the
genius loci. The Fratres Arvales were an imperial invention (See R.
Syme, (1980) Some Arval Brethren, Oxford p. 106 n.12 for K. Latte's
recognition of these as antiquarian reconstructions. See G. Dumezil,
trans. P. Krapp, Archaic Roman Religion, Chicago, 1970; Vol. I, Pp.
34-38 comparing indigitamenta with imperial apparitores). The
cultus that it conducted was solely for the health and welfare of the
emperor and his family. This is reflected above in some of the other
divinities which are mentioned, the Virgines divae and Famuli divi.
As well as genius of the emperor in front of the Caesareum. This
collegium did not perform ambularia, or bless the fields, or do any
of the rites that are erroneously associated with them on account of
their name. Such rites that were related to agriculture were
conducted by a special class of priests called Semones. These were
found at certain other Latin cities, but not at Rome. The only
reference to "brothers of the fields" that date to the Republic is
found in Varro where he is specifically referring to Romulus and
Remus rather than to a priesthood. None the less the records of the
Fratres Arvales offer important insights into Roman ritual because,
being invented by Roman antiquarians, they contain some of the very
oldest prayers, such as the so-called Carmen Fratrum Arvalum, and
details of ritual procedures that are otherwise not reported.


The thought for today is from Epictetus, Enchiridion 20

"Remember that it is not he who gives abuse or blows who affronts;
but the view we take of these things as insulting. When, therefore,
any one provokes you, be assured that it is your own opinion which
provokes you. Try, therefore, in the first place, not to be
bewildered by appearances. For if you once gain time and respite, you
will more easily command yourself."
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52173 From: Stephen Gallagher Date: 2007-11-06
Subject: The Centuria Praerogativa and the Presidium
Salvete Nova Romans

In accordance with my call for the Comitia Centuriata I stated that
during the Contio the Diribitores needed to select and announce the
Centuria Praerogativa.

I call on the Diribitores to announce the Centuria Praerogativa
before the end of the Contio which ends at
5:59 PM, Roma time, on 8 November 2760 a.u.c

Also as a reminder in my call for the Comitia Populi Tributa
the Tribe VI: Corneliain was named as the presidium
(the first tribe to be counted)..


Valete

Tiberius Galerius Paulinus
Consul
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52174 From: marcushoratius Date: 2007-11-06
Subject: Re: auspices
Salve Marca Hortensia

Well, no, not really. Auspicia could be taken by anyone, including
augures, anywhere and on any question. As the article in Smith
mentions, Cicero distinguished the person who sat observing the signs
as the Auspex who takes the auspicium and the Augur assisted with
interpreting those signs. The Augures were present in public
auspicium more to see that the rite was performed correctly than to
interpret signs.

An augurium had to be performed by the highest magistrate, it had to
be performed inside the poemerium, at one of two sites - the
augurculum on the Arx or the augurculum on the Quirinal Hill - and it
had to pertain to certain questions related to the welbeing of the
State.

There was a special situation in which augures were called upon to
perform an auspicium. Whenever lightning struck the earth, all that
it struck, including the soil, had to be buried in a special rite and
a shrine erected over it called a puteol. The Augur used the auspices
on this occasion to determine the boundaries of the templum in which
the puteol was constructed. These were not necessarily the public
Augures, and likely they were not. We are told that every family kept
their own books on augury, what signs each family used as auspices
could vary, and more often than not the augur would be a family member
who had studied the family's tradition. But apparently there were
other private augures who could be hired when needed.

No matter who performed an auspicium, or where, first a terrestrial
templum had to be marked out, and then the celestial templum in which
to observe the auspices was erected. Erecting the celestial temple is
what characterized an auspicium.

The augurcula were established places to conduct an augurium. We know
from a couple other sites, one being at Bazia, that these had marked
stations. Each station was dedicated to a different deity. Altars
were probably erected at each, and sacrifices performed to the various
deities who were invoked to witness the rite and send auspices. At
the center was the seat of Silvanus, where the Auspex sat inside the
tabernaculum. He would perform the rites in a rigid manner, watched
over and perhaps assisted by the Augures. It was very stylized,
ritualized, and carefully choreographed. Others in the augurculum had
to remain standing outside the tabernaculum. These would include the
tibicen, augures, possibly camilli or others who assisted the Auspex
when performing the sacrifices prior to seating himself to take the
auspices.

While more formalized, and the instances of its use more limited, an
augurium was essentially interchangeable with an auspicium in what was
performed during each.

Vale optime et vade in pace Deorum
M Moravius Piscinus


--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Maior" <rory12001@...> wrote:
>
> -M. Hortensia Gaiae Octaviae spd:
> I'd intended to work on an article for the NRwiki, it's such a
> big, big topic!
> Magistrates and cives take auspices; augurs perform an
> augury.
> vale
> Marca Hortensia Maior
>
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52175 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2007-11-06
Subject: Iamdudum petasum ieci
A. Tullia Scholastica quiritibus bonae voluntatis S.P.D.

As legally required, I posted my candidacy for the quaestura to a public
Nova Roman forum and to the presiding officer, Consul Paulinus, some time
ago. I am now repeating that statement here in this wider forum.

There is a dearth of candidates, especially for our lower offices, and
in recent years it is not unheard-of for long time citizens, even
magistrates, to seek lower office after a higher one. For the good of the
Res Publica I have offered myself as a candidate for this position. If
elected, I will serve faithfully and fairly to the best of my ability, as I
have in the past. I am currently serving as praetrix and senatrix, was
rogatrix last year, have served as consular accensa, praetorian scriba (two
terms), censorial scriba (almost three years), and curule aedilician scriba
(current and last year). In addition, I am rogatorial scriba, Latin
interpreter, and praeceptrix of Latin at the Academia Thules.

Valete.


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52176 From: Ice Hunter Date: 2007-11-07
Subject: Re: The LEX GALERIA DE PRIVATIS REBUS debate
Salve Triari,

>If a citizen is that afraid of his name, address and phone number
>being given to the elected heads of an organization, then...I say
>again, maybe they should think about why they were not afraid to fill
>out the citizenship application?

Perhaps because, like myself, the citizen read the current law and assumed his/her information was safely in the hands of the censors?

Vale optime,
Artoria

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52177 From: David Kling (Modianus) Date: 2007-11-07
Subject: Re: Comitia Plebis Tributa election process working !
Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus Tito Iulio Sabino salutem dicit

Some do not think a list for magistrates is useful, and claim it is
even "un-Roman." I saw it useful because the magistrates of Nova
Roma, along with the senate, are the leaders of this organization and
it is in the best interest of Nova Roma is the magistrates get along
and communicate. If that is un-Roman then perhaps philosopher Thomas
Hobbes was right and we [i.e., humanity] are in a state of "war of all
against all." I don't like Hobbes, and I don't agree with his
philosophy. I think it is beneficial for magistrates to communicate
and work together to drive Nova Roma forward.

Vale;

Caeso Buteo

On Nov 6, 2007 7:47 PM, Titus Iulius Sabinus <iulius_sabinus@...> wrote:

> SALVE ET SALVETE!
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "David Kling (Modianus)"
> <tau.athanasios@...> wrote:
>
> > This was one of the reasons I, as consul last year, created an e-
> mail list for the magistrates of Nova Roma.>>>
>
> I know. As curule aedile I was member and the list works. If
> magistrates really want to collaborate, this list, without doubts, was
> and still can be useful.
>
> VALE ET VALETE,
> IVL SABINVS
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52178 From: David Kling (Modianus) Date: 2007-11-07
Subject: Re: The Centuria Praerogativa and the Presidium
What an auspicious day to be in Tribe VI!! To think... I used to
think I never won anything!

Valete:

Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus

On Nov 6, 2007 11:23 PM, Stephen Gallagher <spqr753@...> wrote:
>
> Salvete Nova Romans
>
> In accordance with my call for the Comitia Centuriata I stated that
> during the Contio the Diribitores needed to select and announce the
> Centuria Praerogativa.
>
> I call on the Diribitores to announce the Centuria Praerogativa
> before the end of the Contio which ends at
> 5:59 PM, Roma time, on 8 November 2760 a.u.c
>
> Also as a reminder in my call for the Comitia Populi Tributa
> the Tribe VI: Corneliain was named as the presidium
> (the first tribe to be counted)..
>
> Valete
>
> Tiberius Galerius Paulinus
> Consul
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52179 From: David Kling (Modianus) Date: 2007-11-07
Subject: Re: Iamdudum petasum ieci
Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus A. Tulliae Scholasticae salutem dicit

To the best of my knowledge you were never inducted into the senate as
a senatrix. You are in the senate as a praetor, but are not
technically a member of the senate. You vote in the senate per Lex
Popillia senatoria, but are not an official member of the senate.

Vale:

Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus
Censor

On Nov 6, 2007 10:46 PM, A. Tullia Scholastica <fororom@...> wrote:

> A. Tullia Scholastica quiritibus bonae voluntatis S.P.D.
>
> As legally required, I posted my candidacy for the quaestura to a public
> Nova Roman forum and to the presiding officer, Consul Paulinus, some time
> ago. I am now repeating that statement here in this wider forum.
>
> There is a dearth of candidates, especially for our lower offices, and
> in recent years it is not unheard-of for long time citizens, even
> magistrates, to seek lower office after a higher one. For the good of the
> Res Publica I have offered myself as a candidate for this position. If
> elected, I will serve faithfully and fairly to the best of my ability, as I
> have in the past. I am currently serving as praetrix and senatrix, was
> rogatrix last year, have served as consular accensa, praetorian scriba (two
> terms), censorial scriba (almost three years), and curule aedilician scriba
> (current and last year). In addition, I am rogatorial scriba, Latin
> interpreter, and praeceptrix of Latin at the Academia Thules.
>
> Valete.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52180 From: Maior Date: 2007-11-07
Subject: Re: auspices
Salve sis Marce Horati;
ugh I should never talk about augury & auspices off the top of
my head.It's always a mistake. Apologies. I've got to make a copy
of 'The Augural Law'.
But now there was a prodigy today..do we only regard them if in
Rome?
Maior
>
> Well, no, not really. Auspicia could be taken by anyone,
including
> augures, anywhere and on any question. As the article in Smith
> mentions, Cicero distinguished the person who sat observing the
signs
> as the Auspex who takes the auspicium and the Augur assisted with
> interpreting those signs. The Augures were present in public
> auspicium more to see that the rite was performed correctly than
to
> interpret signs.
>
> An augurium had to be performed by the highest magistrate, it had
to
> be performed inside the poemerium, at one of two sites - the
> augurculum on the Arx or the augurculum on the Quirinal Hill - and
it
> had to pertain to certain questions related to the welbeing of the
> State.
>
> There was a special situation in which augures were called upon to
> perform an auspicium. Whenever lightning struck the earth, all
that
> it struck, including the soil, had to be buried in a special rite
and
> a shrine erected over it called a puteol. The Augur used the
auspices
> on this occasion to determine the boundaries of the templum in
which
> the puteol was constructed. These were not necessarily the public
> Augures, and likely they were not. We are told that every family
kept
> their own books on augury, what signs each family used as auspices
> could vary, and more often than not the augur would be a family
member
> who had studied the family's tradition. But apparently there were
> other private augures who could be hired when needed.
>
> No matter who performed an auspicium, or where, first a
terrestrial
> templum had to be marked out, and then the celestial templum in
which
> to observe the auspices was erected. Erecting the celestial
temple is
> what characterized an auspicium.
>
> The augurcula were established places to conduct an augurium. We
know
> from a couple other sites, one being at Bazia, that these had
marked
> stations. Each station was dedicated to a different deity.
Altars
> were probably erected at each, and sacrifices performed to the
various
> deities who were invoked to witness the rite and send auspices.
At
> the center was the seat of Silvanus, where the Auspex sat inside
the
> tabernaculum. He would perform the rites in a rigid manner,
watched
> over and perhaps assisted by the Augures. It was very stylized,
> ritualized, and carefully choreographed. Others in the augurculum
had
> to remain standing outside the tabernaculum. These would include
the
> tibicen, augures, possibly camilli or others who assisted the
Auspex
> when performing the sacrifices prior to seating himself to take
the
> auspices.
>
> While more formalized, and the instances of its use more limited,
an
> augurium was essentially interchangeable with an auspicium in what
was
> performed during each.
>
> Vale optime et vade in pace Deorum
> M Moravius Piscinus
>
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Maior" <rory12001@> wrote:
> >
> > -M. Hortensia Gaiae Octaviae spd:
> > I'd intended to work on an article for the NRwiki, it's such
a
> > big, big topic!
> > Magistrates and cives take auspices; augurs perform an
> > augury.
> > vale
> > Marca Hortensia Maior
> >
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52181 From: Titus Flavius Aquila Date: 2007-11-07
Subject: AW: [Nova-Roma] Re: Julian the Blessed [was a. d. VIII Eidus Novembr
T. Flavius Aquila Marco Moravi Piscino Horatiano salutem plurimam dicit

Magnas gratias tibi ago !

I am a great admirer of Flavius Claudius Iulianus (Julian II )and of Marcus Aurelius Valerius Maxentius ,
both of them I call the last real Romans in Roman Antiqua.

Di te incolumem custodiant

Titus Flavius Aquila
Scriba censoris GFBM
Tribunus Plebis Candidatus



----- Ursprüngliche Mail ----
Von: marcushoratius <mhoratius@...>
An: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Gesendet: Dienstag, den 6. November 2007, 22:31:35 Uhr
Betreff: [Nova-Roma] Re: Julian the Blessed [was a. d. VIII Eidus Novembris]

Salva sis, Lucia Livia

Before there was a Nova Roma, there was the Julian Society.
http://www.julianso ciety.org/ Both were founded by our Pontifex
Maximus M. Cassius Julianus. He was the one who introduced calling
Julian II the Blessed in Nova Roma.

Vale optime
M Moravius Piscinus

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com, "liviacases" <cases@...> wrote:
>
> L. Livia Plauta S.P.D.
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com, "marcushoratius" <mhoratius@>
> wrote:
>
> > AUC 1108 / 355 CE Julian the Blessed becomes Caesar
> >
> I never heard Julian II being referred to as "Julian the Blessed".
>
> He is usually referred to as "Julianus Apostata", or by people who
> don't sympathyze with christian religion, just as Julian II.
>
> So I'd like to know who started to call him "the Blessed", and how
> would that sound in Latin. Julianus Benedictus?
>
> Valete,
> L. Livia Plauta (eagerly waiting to get her first coin by Julian
II,
> bought over the internet).
>





Heute schon einen Blick in die Zukunft von E-Mails wagen? www.yahoo.de/mail

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52182 From: Q. Caecilius Metellus Date: 2007-11-07
Subject: Re: To Begin the Ludi Plebeii
Q. Caecilius Metellus Fl. Galerio Aureliano salutem dicit.

Indeed, my friend, I would agree with you, if that prayer had been for a.d.
VIII Id. Nov.; however, it was pr. Non. Nov., which was not an impious day for
such a thing. As the preface to my original missive stated, it somehow never
made it to the list on the day it was originally sent; there may be some
reasonable argument for impiety in my stating on a dies ater that the act had
been done, though I would disagree with the argument.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52183 From: marcushoratius Date: 2007-11-07
Subject: The Coming Year
Savlete optime Censor Caeso Modianus et Quirites omnes

Titus Sabinus and I have begun to exchange our thoughts and both
agree that the list for magistrates shall be revived. Last year it
was an effective tool for communicating between magistrates to avoid
problems as they arose, as with those that have thus far with this
election or in 2005. It also allowed all magistrates to share ideas,
work out compromises on legislation, and coordinate their efforts in
various ways. We have you and your colleague Consularis Pompeia
Strabo to thank for it. In sharp contrast has been the dismal
performance of Consules Glaerius and Faustus this year in
accomplishing much of anything.

Sabinus and I have also discussed forming a joint Cohors Consularis
so that the Consules and their respective staffs will be working
together. Each Consul will take over certain areas of
responsibilities, just as in Roma antiqua each Consul had his own
designated provincia. Each of the accensi are to be given a specific
assignment, but all will be available to lend their comments to a
collective and cooperative leadership.

Both Consules will be on the list for gubenatores, working with them
on ideas to assist the develop of the provincae. Gubenator
Aurelianus spoke of a standardized form for provinciae to request
funds from the Senate. The Consules will work with the gubenatores
to produce their own standard form. I also wish to see the
gubenatores produce a standardized format for making their annual
reports to the Senate. I wish for the more experienced gubenatores to
work with our newer ones to produce a Gubenator's Handbook. In that
handbook we can place these standardized forms as well as others as
may be created. By the conclusion of this year's Census 2007 we will
have information available to judge where it shall be possible to
create new provinciae. Sabinus and I have spoken a little on the
possibilities. It will mean that we shall have new gubenatores. At
the moment there is little information for them to go on, But the
gubenatores' kist is another way to involve a collective approach to
leadership in Nova Roma and Sabinus and I intend to take full
advantage of it.

This year we have seen the beginning of committees form in the
Senate. I have mentioned that I would like to form a standing Senate
committee to deal with budgetary matters. A Scholarship Committee
was formed, of which there is no intended changes to be made for next
year. Other committees could be formed to introduce a new method for
the Senate to work, placing more responsibility on individual
Senatores to participate in the Senate and fulfilling their
responsibily to advize and guide our magistrates on the goals and
long range planning of our civitas.

There is also the Comitia. Last year, while Tribunus Plebis, I
addressed my proposals for plebiscita in the Comitia Plebis Tributa
so that our Plebeian Citizens could offer their own input. They were
as much a part of developing the final versions as any Tribunus might
have been. Differences were worked out in those discussions and
thereby was a better measure presented to the Comitia in the end.
The Consules have available to them the list for the Comitia
Centuriata where we can meet directly with Citizens to discuss ideas
and work out legislation. It is a forum of which Consules have not
yet taken full advantage to communicate with our Citizens, instead of
at them, and involve our Citizens in a more collective approach to
developing the Res Publica Libera.

In the coming year I think you shall see Titus Sabinus and I rely on
organization, delegation of responsibility and authority, and
cooperation between ourselves and with other magistrates to bring
about a more collective involvement of the leadership of Nova Roma
and of all interested Citizens. The coming year, 2008, shall be the
tenth year since the Founding of Nova Roma. In this Anniversary Year
it is time to rekindle in all of our Citizens the Spirit that first
brought Nova Roma to light.

Di Deaeque vos semper ament

M Moravius Piscinus Horatianus

Senator
Flamen Carmentalis
Candidatus Consulatus


Sapimus animo, fruimur anima; sine animo anima est debilis.
"We savor the mind; we enjoy the soul; the soul is crippled without
reason." ~ L. Accius, Ex Epigonis 15

Aude sapiens!
"Dare to be wise!" ~ L. Annaeus Seneca



--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "David Kling (Modianus)"
<tau.athanasios@...> wrote:
>
> Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus Tito Iulio Sabino salutem dicit
>
> Some do not think a list for magistrates is useful, and claim it is
> even "un-Roman." I saw it useful because the magistrates of Nova
> Roma, along with the senate, are the leaders of this organization
and
> it is in the best interest of Nova Roma is the magistrates get along
> and communicate. If that is un-Roman then perhaps philosopher
Thomas
> Hobbes was right and we [i.e., humanity] are in a state of "war of
all
> against all." I don't like Hobbes, and I don't agree with his
> philosophy. I think it is beneficial for magistrates to communicate
> and work together to drive Nova Roma forward.
>
> Vale;
>
> Caeso Buteo
>
> On Nov 6, 2007 7:47 PM, Titus Iulius Sabinus <iulius_sabinus@...>
wrote:
>
> > SALVE ET SALVETE!
> >
> > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "David Kling (Modianus)"
> > <tau.athanasios@> wrote:
> >
> > > This was one of the reasons I, as consul last year, created an
e-
> > mail list for the magistrates of Nova Roma.>>>
> >
> > I know. As curule aedile I was member and the list works. If
> > magistrates really want to collaborate, this list, without
doubts, was
> > and still can be useful.
> >
> > VALE ET VALETE,
> > IVL SABINVS
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52184 From: titus.aquila Date: 2007-11-07
Subject: Re: The Coming Year
T.Flavius Aquila Marco Moravi Piscino Horatiano salutem plurimam
dicit

I like your and Titus Sabinus approach very much and hope that you
will succeed in achieving your goals for the benfit of the Populus
Nova Romanum.

Bonam habe Fortunam

Di te incolumem custodiant

Titus Flavius Aquila
Scriba Censoris GFBM
Tribunus Plebis Candidatus




--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "marcushoratius" <mhoratius@...>
wrote:
>
> Savlete optime Censor Caeso Modianus et Quirites omnes
>
> Titus Sabinus and I have begun to exchange our thoughts and both
> agree that the list for magistrates shall be revived. Last year
it
> was an effective tool for communicating between magistrates to
avoid
> problems as they arose, as with those that have thus far with this
> election or in 2005. It also allowed all magistrates to share
ideas,
> work out compromises on legislation, and coordinate their efforts
in
> various ways. We have you and your colleague Consularis Pompeia
> Strabo to thank for it. In sharp contrast has been the dismal
> performance of Consules Glaerius and Faustus this year in
> accomplishing much of anything.
>
> Sabinus and I have also discussed forming a joint Cohors
Consularis
> so that the Consules and their respective staffs will be working
> together. Each Consul will take over certain areas of
> responsibilities, just as in Roma antiqua each Consul had his own
> designated provincia. Each of the accensi are to be given a
specific
> assignment, but all will be available to lend their comments to a
> collective and cooperative leadership.
>
> Both Consules will be on the list for gubenatores, working with
them
> on ideas to assist the develop of the provincae. Gubenator
> Aurelianus spoke of a standardized form for provinciae to request
> funds from the Senate. The Consules will work with the
gubenatores
> to produce their own standard form. I also wish to see the
> gubenatores produce a standardized format for making their annual
> reports to the Senate. I wish for the more experienced gubenatores
to
> work with our newer ones to produce a Gubenator's Handbook. In
that
> handbook we can place these standardized forms as well as others
as
> may be created. By the conclusion of this year's Census 2007 we
will
> have information available to judge where it shall be possible to
> create new provinciae. Sabinus and I have spoken a little on the
> possibilities. It will mean that we shall have new gubenatores.
At
> the moment there is little information for them to go on, But the
> gubenatores' kist is another way to involve a collective approach
to
> leadership in Nova Roma and Sabinus and I intend to take full
> advantage of it.
>
> This year we have seen the beginning of committees form in the
> Senate. I have mentioned that I would like to form a standing
Senate
> committee to deal with budgetary matters. A Scholarship Committee
> was formed, of which there is no intended changes to be made for
next
> year. Other committees could be formed to introduce a new method
for
> the Senate to work, placing more responsibility on individual
> Senatores to participate in the Senate and fulfilling their
> responsibily to advize and guide our magistrates on the goals and
> long range planning of our civitas.
>
> There is also the Comitia. Last year, while Tribunus Plebis, I
> addressed my proposals for plebiscita in the Comitia Plebis
Tributa
> so that our Plebeian Citizens could offer their own input. They
were
> as much a part of developing the final versions as any Tribunus
might
> have been. Differences were worked out in those discussions and
> thereby was a better measure presented to the Comitia in the end.
> The Consules have available to them the list for the Comitia
> Centuriata where we can meet directly with Citizens to discuss
ideas
> and work out legislation. It is a forum of which Consules have
not
> yet taken full advantage to communicate with our Citizens, instead
of
> at them, and involve our Citizens in a more collective approach to
> developing the Res Publica Libera.
>
> In the coming year I think you shall see Titus Sabinus and I rely
on
> organization, delegation of responsibility and authority, and
> cooperation between ourselves and with other magistrates to bring
> about a more collective involvement of the leadership of Nova Roma
> and of all interested Citizens. The coming year, 2008, shall be
the
> tenth year since the Founding of Nova Roma. In this Anniversary
Year
> it is time to rekindle in all of our Citizens the Spirit that
first
> brought Nova Roma to light.
>
> Di Deaeque vos semper ament
>
> M Moravius Piscinus Horatianus
>
> Senator
> Flamen Carmentalis
> Candidatus Consulatus
>
>
> Sapimus animo, fruimur anima; sine animo anima est debilis.
> "We savor the mind; we enjoy the soul; the soul is crippled
without
> reason." ~ L. Accius, Ex Epigonis 15
>
> Aude sapiens!
> "Dare to be wise!" ~ L. Annaeus Seneca
>
>
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "David Kling (Modianus)"
> <tau.athanasios@> wrote:
> >
> > Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus Tito Iulio Sabino salutem dicit
> >
> > Some do not think a list for magistrates is useful, and claim it
is
> > even "un-Roman." I saw it useful because the magistrates of Nova
> > Roma, along with the senate, are the leaders of this
organization
> and
> > it is in the best interest of Nova Roma is the magistrates get
along
> > and communicate. If that is un-Roman then perhaps philosopher
> Thomas
> > Hobbes was right and we [i.e., humanity] are in a state of "war
of
> all
> > against all." I don't like Hobbes, and I don't agree with his
> > philosophy. I think it is beneficial for magistrates to
communicate
> > and work together to drive Nova Roma forward.
> >
> > Vale;
> >
> > Caeso Buteo
> >
> > On Nov 6, 2007 7:47 PM, Titus Iulius Sabinus <iulius_sabinus@>
> wrote:
> >
> > > SALVE ET SALVETE!
> > >
> > > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "David Kling (Modianus)"
> > > <tau.athanasios@> wrote:
> > >
> > > > This was one of the reasons I, as consul last year, created
an
> e-
> > > mail list for the magistrates of Nova Roma.>>>
> > >
> > > I know. As curule aedile I was member and the list works. If
> > > magistrates really want to collaborate, this list, without
> doubts, was
> > > and still can be useful.
> > >
> > > VALE ET VALETE,
> > > IVL SABINVS
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52185 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2007-11-07
Subject: Re: praeturae petitio alius
A. Tullia Scholastica M. Hortensiae quiritibus bonae
voluntatis S.P.D.
>>
>> This deserves a reply, and since no one else seems to have addressed
>> this, that task has apparently fallen to me.
>>
>>
>>
>> Marca Hortensia Maior Quiritibus SPD
>> I too don the toga candida and entry the race for praetor for
>> the 2008 elections in Nova Roma.
>>
>> I have been a civis since 2003:
>> Governor of Hibernia
>> scriba Censoris Iuris & Investigatio
>> Tribuna Plebis
>> Plebeian Aedile
>> http://www.novaroma.org/civitas/album?id=5832
>>
>> In accord with the ways of the Republic I took last year off between
>> public offices. But I still worked for the res publica with
>> Vox Romana podcast
>> Nrwiki booklists for the cultus deorum
>> http://www.novaroma.org/nr/Reading_list_for_the_cultus_deorum
>> articles and an online temple to Fortuna
>> http://www.novaroma.org/nr/Fortuna
>>
>> I am a proud plebeian & climbed the cursus honorum giving games as
>> plebeian aedile. http://www.vroma.org/~bmcmanus/cursus.html
>>
>> You will know what to expect from me,
>>
>> ATS: Those of us who have been here long enough certainly do know what
>> to expect of you. The question lies elsewhere, however.
>>
>>
>> as I will be a praetor in the
>> manner of Roma Antiqua.
>>
>> ATS: After some surgery, perhaps, since very few of them were female,
>> but now we see that you prefer a higher calling. The censura beckons.
>>
>>
>> I will preside at all ceremonies and
>> personally honour the cultus deorum. I will preside over trials.
>>
>> ATS: It is highly unlikely that any NR praetor/praetrix would have to
>> preside over trials. Especially not in the plural.
>>
>> I
>> will not organize the tabularium.
>>
>> ATS: That would require high-level organizational skills, infinite time,
>> and the cooperation of the wiki magistri, who seem preoccupied.
>>
>>
>> I will not censor the main list.
>>
>> ATS: That is hardly surprising. The Romans did not like innovation.
>> That may have contributed to their fall, but it is one of their
>> characteristics. Since the Main List has not been censored, and is not
>> censored, it is unlikely that any praetor/praetrix will censor it. It is
>> moderated to prevent spam and other unwelcome trash. You and others who
>> believe that the ML is censored are sadly mistaken, and in your case, it is
>> almost surprising that a citizen who has been here so long still believes
>> this nonsense. Moderators, however, need a sense of propriety, and that is
>> something which may not be present in certain parties who should therefore
>> never be allowed to moderate any list more decorous than the BA.
>>
>>
>> May we all grow in our Romanitas.
>>
>> ATS: Indeed.
>>
>> May the di immortales be propitious to us!
>> Marca Hortensia Maior
>> candidate for praetor
>>

ATS: Di nos protegant!

Valete.




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52186 From: David Kling (Modianus) Date: 2007-11-07
Subject: Re: The Coming Year
Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus M. Moravio Piscino Horatiano salutem dicit

I am pleased to see the NR Magistrates list will be resurrected and
utilized. I was disappointed to see it go stagnate this year. I
agree that this years consular performance has been lacking in
performance. I think it is important for colleagues to communicate
and work together.

Good ideas with the senate committees and with revitalizing the provinces.

Next year IS the 10th anniversary. Too bad nothing was planned this
year to celebrate. Hopefully something can be put together really
quick when you and Sabinus take office.

Vale:

Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus

On Nov 7, 2007 4:54 AM, marcushoratius <mhoratius@...> wrote:
>
> Savlete optime Censor Caeso Modianus et Quirites omnes
>
> Titus Sabinus and I have begun to exchange our thoughts and both
> agree that the list for magistrates shall be revived. Last year it
> was an effective tool for communicating between magistrates to avoid
> problems as they arose, as with those that have thus far with this
> election or in 2005. It also allowed all magistrates to share ideas,
> work out compromises on legislation, and coordinate their efforts in
> various ways. We have you and your colleague Consularis Pompeia
> Strabo to thank for it. In sharp contrast has been the dismal
> performance of Consules Glaerius and Faustus this year in
> accomplishing much of anything.
>
> Sabinus and I have also discussed forming a joint Cohors Consularis
> so that the Consules and their respective staffs will be working
> together. Each Consul will take over certain areas of
> responsibilities, just as in Roma antiqua each Consul had his own
> designated provincia. Each of the accensi are to be given a specific
> assignment, but all will be available to lend their comments to a
> collective and cooperative leadership.
>
> Both Consules will be on the list for gubenatores, working with them
> on ideas to assist the develop of the provincae. Gubenator
> Aurelianus spoke of a standardized form for provinciae to request
> funds from the Senate. The Consules will work with the gubenatores
> to produce their own standard form. I also wish to see the
> gubenatores produce a standardized format for making their annual
> reports to the Senate. I wish for the more experienced gubenatores to
> work with our newer ones to produce a Gubenator's Handbook. In that
> handbook we can place these standardized forms as well as others as
> may be created. By the conclusion of this year's Census 2007 we will
> have information available to judge where it shall be possible to
> create new provinciae. Sabinus and I have spoken a little on the
> possibilities. It will mean that we shall have new gubenatores. At
> the moment there is little information for them to go on, But the
> gubenatores' kist is another way to involve a collective approach to
> leadership in Nova Roma and Sabinus and I intend to take full
> advantage of it.
>
> This year we have seen the beginning of committees form in the
> Senate. I have mentioned that I would like to form a standing Senate
> committee to deal with budgetary matters. A Scholarship Committee
> was formed, of which there is no intended changes to be made for next
> year. Other committees could be formed to introduce a new method for
> the Senate to work, placing more responsibility on individual
> Senatores to participate in the Senate and fulfilling their
> responsibily to advize and guide our magistrates on the goals and
> long range planning of our civitas.
>
> There is also the Comitia. Last year, while Tribunus Plebis, I
> addressed my proposals for plebiscita in the Comitia Plebis Tributa
> so that our Plebeian Citizens could offer their own input. They were
> as much a part of developing the final versions as any Tribunus might
> have been. Differences were worked out in those discussions and
> thereby was a better measure presented to the Comitia in the end.
> The Consules have available to them the list for the Comitia
> Centuriata where we can meet directly with Citizens to discuss ideas
> and work out legislation. It is a forum of which Consules have not
> yet taken full advantage to communicate with our Citizens, instead of
> at them, and involve our Citizens in a more collective approach to
> developing the Res Publica Libera.
>
> In the coming year I think you shall see Titus Sabinus and I rely on
> organization, delegation of responsibility and authority, and
> cooperation between ourselves and with other magistrates to bring
> about a more collective involvement of the leadership of Nova Roma
> and of all interested Citizens. The coming year, 2008, shall be the
> tenth year since the Founding of Nova Roma. In this Anniversary Year
> it is time to rekindle in all of our Citizens the Spirit that first
> brought Nova Roma to light.
>
> Di Deaeque vos semper ament
>
> M Moravius Piscinus Horatianus
>
> Senator
> Flamen Carmentalis
> Candidatus Consulatus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52187 From: Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus Date: 2007-11-07
Subject: Re: The Coming Year
Cn. Lentulus M. Moravio consuli candidato sal.


Excellent! This is what I want to hear from a consular candidate. I will support both you an T. Sabinus candidacy and your work in the next year.

Please permit me, however, to react some points.


>>> the dismal
performance of Consules Glaerius and Faustus this year in
accomplishing much of anything. <<<


I think it was mostly Faustus fault...


>>> By the conclusion of this year's Census 2007 we will
have information available to judge where it shall be possible to
create new provinciae. <<<


If there is macro-State with at least 5-6 active citizen and cca. 10 member in sum, I agree that the Senate can consider to create a new one.
But, please, fix this principle: one macronational state or one confederation = one provincia.
I repeat this forever if needed: the place for NR civile life is not the provincia but the "municipium" or "regio". For example: be the USA only one Provincia America but subdivided into several regions (governed by legates) and free municipiums (governed by elected local magistrates). The role of the province is the connection with the centre, with the Senate, and to follow its instructions. The role of the regiones and municipiums is to create free and active civil life, quite independent from the centre. This is the ballance.


>>> The coming year, 2008, shall be the
tenth year since the Founding of Nova Roma. In this Anniversary Year
it is time to rekindle in all of our Citizens the Spirit that first
brought Nova Roma to light. <<<


LONG LIVE NOVA ROMA!

We indeed must cebrate this: it will be your task to organize the Anniversary: what a glory for you! Deserve this.

Valete!




Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus,
R O G A T O R
-------------------------------
Legatus Pro Praetore Provinciae Pannoniae
Sacerdos Provinciae Pannoniae
Accensus Consulis Ti. Galerii Paulini
Scriba Aedilis Curulis Iuliae Caesaris Cytheridis Aeges
Scriba Interpretis Linguae Latinae A. Tulliae Scholasticae
-------------------------------
Decurio I. Sodalitatis Latinitatis
Dominus Factionis Russatae
Latinista, Classicus Philologus


---------------------------------

---------------------------------
L'email della prossima generazione? Puoi averla con la nuova Yahoo! Mail

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52188 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2007-11-07
Subject: Re: The Coming Year
Salve Marce Horati,

marcushoratius <mhoratius@...> writes:

> I also wish to see the
> gubenatores produce a standardized format for making their annual
> reports to the Senate.

There already is one. If you look in the senate archives for my
reports you'll see I used it. It was also in the files of the
Governor's mailing list.

Vale,

CN-EQVIT-MARINVS
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52189 From: marcushoratius Date: 2007-11-07
Subject: Re: auspices
Salva sis Marca Hortensia

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Maior" <rory12001@...> wrote:
>
> Salve sis Marce Horati;
> ugh I should never talk about augury & auspices off the top of
> my head.It's always a mistake. Apologies. I've got to make a copy
> of 'The Augural Law'.
> But now there was a prodigy today..do we only regard them if in
> Rome?
> Maior

No, not at all. Reccall your Livy where he speaks of prodigies.
Prodigies that occurred elsewhere were considered by the Roman
Senate. These were usually places significant to the Latins. Mount
Alba (25.7.7-9). The Temple of Juno Sospita at Lanuvium is mentioned
often among reported prodigies (examples 21.62; 23.31.15; 24.10.6-
13). The hastae Martis in the sanctuary in the Regia at Rome was of
course used to register danger when they moved, but also the hastae
Martis of Praeneste (24.10.10). The Temple of Jupiter at Terracina;
the Temple of Mater Matuta at Satricum (28.11). Outside Latium,
Caere, in Etruria, was significant to Rome because it was there that
during the Gallic sack of the City the sacred objects were
preserved. Prodigies thus reported from there were considered
(21.62).

You can look, too, at how far afield prodigies were considered in
this passage from Livy, with mention of Campania and even Sicily.

"To add to the general feeling of apprehension, information was
received of portents having occurred simultaneously in several
places. In Sicily several of the soldiers' darts were covered with
flames; in Sardinia the same thing happened to the staff in the hand
of an officer who was going his rounds to inspect the sentinels on
the wall; the shores had been lit up by numerous fires; a couple of
shields had sweated blood; some soldiers had been struck by
lightning; an eclipse of the sun had been observed; at Praeneste
there had been a shower of red-hot stones; at Arpi shields had been
seen in the sky and the sun had appeared to be fighting with the
moon; at Capena two moons were visible in the daytime; at Caere the
waters ran mingled with blood, and even the spring of Hercules had
bubbled up with drops of blood on the water; at Antium the ears of
corn which fell into the reapers' basket were blood-stained; at
Falerii the sky seemed to be cleft asunder as with an enormous rift
and all over the opening there was a blazing light; the oracular
tablets shrank and shrivelled without being touched and one had
fallen out with this inscription, "MARS IS SHAKING HIS SPEAR"; and at
the same time the statue of Mars on the Appian Way and the images of
the Wolves sweated blood. Finally, at Capua the sight was seen of the
sky on fire and the moon falling in the midst of a shower of rain." ~
Livy 22.1

I am not so familiar with the imperial era. I would imagine that
something as serious as the destruction of Ephesus by earthquake,
distant from Rome as it was, would still have been regarded a prodigy
of concern to the Rome empire. The Gods and Their temples everywhere
were to be respected. So if a prodigy, such as lightning striking a
temple, occurred anywhere then it might be regarded as a prodigy.

Vale optime et vade in pace Deorum
M Moravius Piscinus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52190 From: marcushoratius Date: 2007-11-07
Subject: Re: The Coming Year
Salve Marine

Yes. It would be nice though if all of the gubenatores knew this and
used it. I think a handbook to which new gubenatores can be referred
(and not so new ones reminded), including the standard forms and
reports they may need, will be a helpful project. Placing the task
before the gubenatores to produce such a handbook would probably
bring up additional ideas.

The list itself can be a place where gubenatores complain about one
thing or another. Or it can be made into a place where problems are
solved through mutual support and experience, producing plans and
projects to the Consules for the Senate to consider. We all have
come to feel the need to vitalize the provinciae as the foundation of
Nova Roma. Such will never come about from the top down. We need,
as Lentullus said, active local oppidia formed into regions that form
provinciae, with channels of communication from the local level
reaching up to the central organization. The list for the
gubenatores is that place of interface between all of the provinciae
with the Consules acting as the executive officers of the central
organization. My concern here is not that we produce a new
standardized form, or proposals for new leges, or anything of that
nature, but rather that we rethink how we do things in Nova Roma to
involve more people in our decision making process so that the
central organization is reflective of and working on the concerns of
our individual members.

Vale optime

M Moravius Piscinus
Senator
Flamen Carmentalis
Candidatus Consulatus


--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Gnaeus Equitius Marinus <gawne@...>
wrote:
>
> Salve Marce Horati,
>
> marcushoratius <mhoratius@...> writes:
>
> > I also wish to see the
> > gubenatores produce a standardized format for making their annual
> > reports to the Senate.
>
> There already is one. If you look in the senate archives for my
> reports you'll see I used it. It was also in the files of the
> Governor's mailing list.
>
> Vale,
>
> CN-EQVIT-MARINVS
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52191 From: C•ARMINIVS•RECCANELLVS Date: 2007-11-07
Subject: Changing name
GAIVS�ARMINIVS�RECCANELLVS�TRIBVNVS�NOVAE�ROMAE�CIVIBUS�S�P�D

Because Caius isn't the correct spelling of the roman name (the correct is Gaius), and according the lex de nominibus mutandis, I inform you that, with autorization by Censor Modianus, I changed my praenomen to Gaius.

Vale & Valete
GAIVS�ARMINIVS�RECCANELLVS
======================
TRIBVNVS�PLEBIS�NOVAE�ROMAE
"Quousque tandem, Lula, abutere patientia nostra?"

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52192 From: James Lee Mathews Date: 2007-11-07
Subject: Flavours, Sweet -- Roman Times -- 3rd Qtr. -- 2007
Flavours -- Sweet

The Roman love of honey
has often been mocked.
In Apicius, we often
find it used with meat,
vegetables and fish as
well as in deserts.
Apicius lists thirty-
four sauces for fish,
of which only two are
entirely savory: honey,
syrup, or preserved
fruit is added to the
rest.

Of the four flavors
that we distinguish,
sweet is the most
popular. Animals,
children and the Gods
love sweetness, so why
should adults pretend
to outgrow it? Some
might turn up their
noses at a sauce that
contains a pinch of
sugar, but many a cook
knows that it gives a
lift to many savory
dishes.

----(I have found this
to be true in making
spaghetti sauce and
tomato soup. A little
sweetener enhances the
taste --MA)

Sometimes even the
French combine salty
dishes with sweet
flavours, ham with
honey,

----(as the Romans
did -- see the recent
recipe for Ham and
Figs -- MA)

or cheese with fruit,
for example. The
Romans used sweet
tastes to counter
overpowering
saltiness. Apicius
writes:

"If it is too sweet,
add "garum" (fish
sauce). If it is too
salty add syrup."

Honey (Mel)-----

Bees make honey from
flowers, and honey was
seen by the Romans as a
gift from heaven,
closely related to the
nectar drunk on Mount
Olympus.

One Greek myth has it
that Jupiter
transformed the lovely
Melissa into the first
bee. According to
another, the bee
descended from the
horse-fly, which was
ennobled with the help
of the sun.

There was disagreement
among the Romans about
the reproduction of
bees. Some thought
that bees were able to
reproduce, while others
believed they were born
from rotting beef.
Still others were
convinced that they
came into being in both
ways, or that bees were
born from flowers.
That the queen in each
swarm is the mother of
all it's members was
not discovered until
the 17th century. In
Rome one could buy
bees, receive them as
presents, or plunder
them from newly
conquered territories.
A bee hive could not be
carried on a cart over
long distances because
it would not survive
the jolts. Instead a
slave carried it
carefully by night.

You could also steal
bees from nature.
Country folk had a
clever way of doing
this: the peasants
would close off one end
of a hollow reed and
pour in some honey,
then place it near a
stream where bees came
to drink. When bees
crept into the reed,
attracted by the honey,
the peasant closed off
the opening with his
finger. Then he
allowed a single bee to
escape and followed it
on foot for as long as
he could. Once he was
sure of his trail the
peasant would let a
second bee escape,
continuing until he
found the bee's nest.

----(We find a similar
method in use during
the early colonial days
in North America.
Those who hunted "bee
trees" and sold them to
a town, used "bee
boxes" which held
several bees tempted in
by honey. The "bee
box" had a
small "hatch" that
could release one bee
at a time with a flip
of the finger. The
hunter then followed
the "bee-line" to
the "bee-hive"
somewhere in the
woodlands, usually in a
hollow tree.")

If they lived in a
hollow tree, he felled
it, wrapped it in
clothes and carried it
back to his home.

Every farm had a few
beehives, made of clay,
tree bark, woven twigs
or broom, for the
pollination of fruit
trees and vegetables..
Some farms specialized
in honey production,
and plants were grown
for the benefit of the
bees rather than their
owners. Honey farmers
planted roses, thyme,
rosemary, oregano,
savory, basil, poppy,
lilies, saffron,
celery, beans, lentils,
peas, ivy, and clovers,
such as alfalfa, to
keep their bees
supplied with nectar.
They also planted
trees, such as lime,
peach, almond, oak, and
pine for aromatic
nectar. Honey from
farms that grew mostly
vegetables was
considered inferior.

"One flower results in
a thin honey, like
skirret, another in
thick honey like
rosemary,. While the
fig supplies poor
honey, a good quality
comes from alfalfa, and
the best from thyme."

(Varr. R.R. III-xvi,
26)

At the market honey
cost about the same as
olive oil. The two
products were divided
between similar price-
ranges: just as oil is
available from the
first and second
pressings, and so on,
honey than ran from the
honeycomb was the most
expensive.

Unlike many other
ingredients of Roman
cuisine, we know what
their honey tasted like
because bees still
produce it exactly as
they always have..

(to be continued)

Reference:

P Fass, "Around the
Roman Table,"Univ. of
Chicago Press, 1994, P.
146-148

Respectfully Submitted;

Marcus Audens
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52193 From: James Lee Mathews Date: 2007-11-07
Subject: The Wine Revel -- "Roman Times" -- 3rd Qtr. -- 2007
The Wine Revel

This article is a
continuation of the
discussion on wine and
the serving of wine at
the Roman table:

---- Master of the
Revels (magister
bibendi)----

At the beginning of
the "Cominatio"
(Bacchanalien Revel??)
the guests elected a
master of revels
(the "magister
bibendi"). In this
they followed the
Greeks, who called the
king of drinking
the "symposiarch." He
was responsible for the
quantity of alcohol
consumed by the guests
so he had to know who
could hold his drink
and who could not. If
he was not well
acquainted with the
guests, he had to rely
on generalizations --
for example, that old
men got more drunk than
young men, the
impetuous more than the
calm, and the pessimist
more than the
optimist. The
authority of
the "Magister" was
beyond dispute. For
that reason it was
important that he
should be neither too
strict nor too liberal:

"For the drunkard is
arrogant and rude, but
the complete abstainer
is more suited to
looking after children
than presiding over a
symposium."

(Plut. 1-4-620C)

Because he was in
charge of alcohol
consumption,
the "magister" also had
overall responsibility
for the carousal. He
had to decide whether a
subject was appropriate
for discussion, and
select speakers. Then
if the conversation
became too trivial or
too heated, he had to
interrupt and propose
another topic.

But the "Magister's"
most important task was
to decide the correct
proportion of water to
wine. His options
ranged from pure wine,
and wine diluted with
six parts water.
Usually the mixture was
two or three parts
water to one part wine,
but one to one was not
uncommon. In all
circumstances the water
was poured into
the "krater" first,
followed by the wine.
Once the wine was
mixed, it was poured
into a small wine jug,
a "Lagona," and from
there into the cups.

Reference:--

P. Faas,. "Around the
Roman Table." page 91

In respect to the
consistency of
the "merum" none of my
references mentions a
consistency of syrup
except after boiling
the "merum" down into a
fraction of it's former
amount. in my wine-
making the result of
the fermentation and
drawing of the wine
into bottles, the
consistency was that of
normal wine of today.
I made my wine in
pretty much the same
way the Romans did
except for using slaves
to smash the grapes. I
used a potato masher.
I used a clean plastic
garbage can and then
racked off the rough
wine into a 3 gallon
glass container fitted
with a gas relief
valve. From there when
the fermentation was
complete it wine was
racked into a second
wine container to leave
behind the remaining
sediment. Finally it
was racked in quart
bottles for storage.
In this way I made
about 50 gallons of
wine, which turned out
pretty good, but the
consistency was always
that of modern wine.
If there is some basic
difference to that
procedure, I would
appreciate knowing the
reference for it.

Respectfully Submitted;

Marcus Audens
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52194 From: James Lee Mathews Date: 2007-11-07
Subject: The Roman Turnip -- "Roman Times" -- 3rd Qtr. -- 2007
----Turnips (rapum)----

The turnip was seen as
simple fare. The plant
is native to Europe,
nutritious. easily
cultivated, and
therefore cheap.
Opinion differed on how
healthy it was. The
great doctor Democritus
rejected turnips,
believing they made
people bloated. Other
doctors saw the turnip
in a more positive
light:

"Diocles praises the
turnip plant, declaring
that it stimulates the
amorous propensities.
So too, does Dionysius,
who adds that its
effects are even
stronger if eaten with
rocket."

(Plin. N.H. XX-viii)

Healthy or not, the
turnip had many
devotees, of whom
Emperor Claudius was
one. When he died, it
was announced that he
was to be deified so
there would be someone
in heaven who could eat
turnip with Rome's
founding father Romulus
(Sen. Apoc. 9).

Martial wrote
an "apophoreta"
(presents for guests to
take home) on the
subject of this winter
vegetable:

"Turnip I give, to
bring you some cheer in
the frost of the
shortest day, while
Romulus -- no less --
is eating the same in
heaven."

(Mart. XIII 16)

Faas provides two
recipes for turnip:

--Boiled Turnip (uses
garum);

--Preserved Turnip
(uses salt).

I can save these for
next time, or simply
forget it. The recipe
for Boiled Turnip sauce
sounds a little strong
(Grin!!!!!).

Respectfully;

Marcus Audens
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52195 From: James Lee Mathews Date: 2007-11-07
Subject: Hymn To Vesta -- "Roman Times" -- 3rd Qtr. -- 2007
---Hymn to Vesta---



At the center of my
home:

At the center of my
hearth:

At the center of my
heart .

Your immaculate flame
burns, white hot

Pure, bright, eternal;

Lighting my heartspace;

Guarding my hearthspace;

Warming my homespace.



Vesta, Mistress of
virtue,

Guide my willing hands

That I might make of my
home

A fit sanctuary in
which to honor you.



Mighty Vesta, you who

Guard and bless the
home,

Let the brilliant heat

Of your eternal flame
keep safe my hearth

That nothing may
invade, infect or
despoil

My dwelling, from
without or within.



Loving Vesta, gentle
keeper of trusts and
secrets

Fill my heart with your
life giving, ever
vigilant fire

That I may,

By my thoughts words,
and deeds

Reflect, however dimly,
Your great glory

For You are beacon and
lodestone,

Guiding my steps and
drawing me back to my
center

You, Vesta, are my joy,
my security, my
inspiration .

And I, who adore You

Entreat Your blessing

Author:--

Soshona Hathaway
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52196 From: James Lee Mathews Date: 2007-11-07
Subject: Book Report -- Greek and Roman Maps -- "Pilum" -- 3rd Qtr. -- 2007
---Book Report / "Greek
and Roman Maps" (Dilke)--
-

Ladies and Gentlemen;

I welcome all the new
members to both the
Sodalitas Militarium and
to the New Roman Lists.

Today I have a special
reason to come before
you as I have a book
report to make. I must
admit that the book is
one which explores a
particular interest of
mine which is mapping.
However, I will share it
with you, as it is a
study in a particular
realm of ancient
history, and there is
much here both of Roman,
and pre-Roman
information which I
believe to be both
interesting and valuable.

========================

The book is:

O.A.W. Dilke, "Greek &
Roman Maps,"The Johns
Hopkins University
Press, Baltimore and
London, 1985

In the text "Greek &
Roman Maps," the author
has researched and laid
out in a following
manner those skills
required by mapmakers
and the development of
these skills as well as
the knowledge of them.
His research starts in
the ancient empires of
Babylonia, and Egypt,
using the ancient work
of Greek and Roman
individuals skilled in
such activities on into
the better known Age of
Discovery.

There is, in the book,
quite a number of plans
and maps ranging from
itineraries (both sea
and land) to building
plans, maps in artistic
format, and maps of
roadways.

The following are
comments from others who
have reviewed this book:

--"Dilke's up-to-date
survey of classical
cartography . . . will
long remain the standard
in the field" -- Meyer
Reinhold, "Classical
World;"

--"It is an extremely
useful book, packed with
information, simply and
succinctly
expressed . . . There is
no doubt that it was
Greek theoretical
thinking and a growing
knowledge of geography,
combined with the
practical demands
imposed upon the
administrators of the
Roman Empire which led
to the development and
widespread use of maps
more or less as we know
them." -- Mary E.
Hoskins Walbank, "Echos
du monde classique;"

--"All of this O.A.W.
Dilke tells. along with
much more that is
peripherally related to
maps: he explains at
length the Roman
technique of surveying
land, reviews the
various land and sea
itineraries that have
survived, and discusses
the kinds of plans the
ancients drew from plans
of cities
to "blueprints" of
buildings . . . He
performs a useful
service in bringing
together this material,
some of which has been
available only in
scattered scholarly
journals." -- Lionel
Casson, "American
Historical Review:"

O.A.W. Dilke was a
professor at the
University of Leeds. He
taught classics at
University College,
Hull, the university of
Glasgow, the Ohio State
university, and the
University of Leeds.

Book Contents:----

--List of Illustrations
(62);

--Preface;

--I, The Predecessors;

--II, Evidence From
Ancient Greece;

--III, Agrippa;

--IV, Geographical
Writers;

--V, Ptolemy and His
Predecessor Marinus;

--VI, Land Surveying;

--VII, Roman Stone Plans;

--VIII, Road Maps and
Land Itineraries;

--IX, Periploi;

--X, Maps In Art form;

--XI, The Development of
Ptolemaic Maps;

--XII, From Antiquity to
the Renaissance.

From my own review, I
find the material most
interesting and a good
read. I shall be able
to produce some good
replicas from this
material to display at
Roman Events as the
Legion III "Cyrenaica"
Engineer, in company
with some other models
of bridges and corduroy
roads that I have
constructed. In that
way, I can bring some of
this ancient material
before the general
public in the form of
actual models of
material taken from this
volume.

Respectfully Submitted;

Marcus Audens
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52197 From: James Lee Mathews Date: 2007-11-07
Subject: "The Goddess" -- "Pilum" -- 3rd Qtr. -- 2007
----The Goddess----

=============
Since the spreading
rumor of the timber
crews cutting trees in
the sacred grove of the
Goddess, an unreasoning
fear of the Goddess had
spread like wildfire
through the troops
quartered here and the
meager winter drill in
this freezing weather
was not nearly enough
to keep the men's minds
off this illusion of an
avenging Goddess. She
was known to strike,
usually when the target
was asleep, and it was
said that the
punishment was both
painful, very personal,
and long-lasting, with
many dying from their
actions against her
laws.

Lucius didn't even like
to think about it, but
it kept creeping back
into his mind. He had
purged himself in the
Cave of Mithra, just
outside the fortress
gate, and he was almost
sure that Mithra would
shield him from this
threat. But -- and
there was always a but;
what if Mithra was busy
with slaying the bull?
Didn't he always have
to do this? Isn't that
what the blood spilling
of the oxen was
necessary more than
once!!?? He really
wasn't sure and
although he needed to
talk with someone he
didn't want to risk his
beliefs against this
new job.

He was doing what he
had wanted to work at
for many years and now
he had his chance. He
shivered in the cold
draft from the
curtained door, and
drew his cloak closer
around him.

Several men had
frostbitten feet in the
surgeon's hall, feet
that turned black and
had to be amputated.
Strange fevers had
taken some of the
legionaries despite
what the surgeons could
do, and they choked to
death, on heir own
saliva. Neither
thought gave him any
peace.

He had written the
notes as dictated to
him by the Chief
Engineer. The notes
that had sent the men
to cut timber for the
planned Rhenus Bridge.
Did that make him a
target of the Goddess?
Surely if anyone was
stricken it would be
the individual who gave
the orders rather than
the people who simply
passed them on.
However, what little he
knew about the Goddess
suggested that her
logic may well be far
different than his. He
shivered again.

He was tired, so very
tired, from a heavy
day's work in the
Tabularium writing
notes, carrying
messages, and putting
files in their proper
places. Notes, and
messages and files
which held those orders
that had resulted in
cutting the sacred
trees. He longed to
lie down and surrender
to a long and deep
sleep, but his fear of
the Goddess kept him
from his pallet. He
longed for sleep and
yet he feared it as he
feared agony and death.

He went to the tiny
window and drew aside
the curtain. Blackness
looked back at him. No
Moon Goddess to light
the night, no stars to
be seen through the
thick clouded sky. A
perfect night for the
Goddess to wander at
large taking her
revenge. Lucius sat on
a bench before a table
littered with scrolls
and message pads. He
slumped over the
table. He was very,
very, afraid.

===========
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52198 From: James Mathews Date: 2007-11-07
Subject: "Roman Times" / "Pilum" -- 3rd Qtr. --2007
Citizens of Nova Roma;

These last few articles complete my promised issues of the subject publications. My apologies or the lateness of this quarterly issue, but the recent trips interrupted my planned schedule.

During November and December, I will be gathering stories, articles, poems, and reviews for the 4th Qtr.Issues of these publications. Should anyone wish to contribute on any topic relating directly to the ancient roman culture, I should be pleased to include such with appropriate credits in these publications.

If there is any interest in publishing an Annual Issue of "Aquila" please make me aware of your desires, and I shall attempt to get at least one copy of that publication out before the end of January.

If there is anyone who has the ability and would like to volunteer some time and effort to put these articles in a publication format, rather than sending the articles one at a time, I should be pleased to hear from you.

Very Respectfully;

Marcus Audens
Senior Editor for NR Publications



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52199 From: Titus Iulius Sabinus Date: 2007-11-07
Subject: Re: The Coming Year
SALVE ET SALVETE!

Qurites!

We have a wonderful opportunity to celebrate next year tenth years
since the founding of Nova Roma.
It's an important year for Nova Roma history. With all was good or
bad we must admit that NR was successfully. It was successfully
because its citizens and its magistrates tried with all efforts to
preserve the roman legacy, to find more accurate ways to the
republican model.
We must be happy because we exist. We must be happy because we have
what to continue. Our problems and mistakes, done without ill
intentions, represent only the normal steps of beginning. During the
time some of them were resolved. There still are a lot to do and
that is wonderful. We need patience. We need to have trust each over
and if is possible to help with all our energy to continue what was
started ten years ago.

I'm happy to see how Marcus Horatius presented some aspects of our
timid thoughts about what we can really do if elected consuls.
Well, I'm sure that we will have a cooperative year as time as, we,
both, have the necessary experience to find common solutions and
middle ways to work each over respecting the ancient tradition.
In the same time I know that a title can't bring more intuition,
more abilities and more power to work. Because that I consider you,
quirites, as my first advisors and probably this is the only one
promise I do in this election time: I will pay attention to your
questions, problems and requests.
I'm ready for a hard working year and I know that Marcus Horatius is
ready for the same thing.


VALETE,
IVL SABINVS
Candidate for consul.




--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "marcushoratius" <mhoratius@...>
wrote:
> Titus Sabinus and I have begun to exchange our thoughts and both
> agree that the list for magistrates shall be revived. Last year
it
> was an effective tool for communicating between magistrates to
avoid
> problems as they arose, as with those that have thus far with this
> election or in 2005. It also allowed all magistrates to share
ideas,
> work out compromises on legislation, and coordinate their efforts
in
> various ways. We have you and your colleague Consularis Pompeia
> Strabo to thank for it. In sharp contrast has been the dismal
> performance of Consules Glaerius and Faustus this year in
> accomplishing much of anything.
>
> Sabinus and I have also discussed forming a joint Cohors
Consularis
> so that the Consules and their respective staffs will be working
> together. Each Consul will take over certain areas of
> responsibilities, just as in Roma antiqua each Consul had his own
> designated provincia. Each of the accensi are to be given a
specific
> assignment, but all will be available to lend their comments to a
> collective and cooperative leadership.
>
> Both Consules will be on the list for gubenatores, working with
them
> on ideas to assist the develop of the provincae. Gubenator
> Aurelianus spoke of a standardized form for provinciae to request
> funds from the Senate. The Consules will work with the
gubenatores
> to produce their own standard form. I also wish to see the
> gubenatores produce a standardized format for making their annual
> reports to the Senate. I wish for the more experienced gubenatores
to
> work with our newer ones to produce a Gubenator's Handbook. In
that
> handbook we can place these standardized forms as well as others
as
> may be created. By the conclusion of this year's Census 2007 we
will
> have information available to judge where it shall be possible to
> create new provinciae. Sabinus and I have spoken a little on the
> possibilities. It will mean that we shall have new gubenatores.
At
> the moment there is little information for them to go on, But the
> gubenatores' kist is another way to involve a collective approach
to
> leadership in Nova Roma and Sabinus and I intend to take full
> advantage of it.
>
> This year we have seen the beginning of committees form in the
> Senate. I have mentioned that I would like to form a standing
Senate
> committee to deal with budgetary matters. A Scholarship Committee
> was formed, of which there is no intended changes to be made for
next
> year. Other committees could be formed to introduce a new method
for
> the Senate to work, placing more responsibility on individual
> Senatores to participate in the Senate and fulfilling their
> responsibily to advize and guide our magistrates on the goals and
> long range planning of our civitas.
>
> There is also the Comitia. Last year, while Tribunus Plebis, I
> addressed my proposals for plebiscita in the Comitia Plebis
Tributa
> so that our Plebeian Citizens could offer their own input. They
were
> as much a part of developing the final versions as any Tribunus
might
> have been. Differences were worked out in those discussions and
> thereby was a better measure presented to the Comitia in the end.
> The Consules have available to them the list for the Comitia
> Centuriata where we can meet directly with Citizens to discuss
ideas
> and work out legislation. It is a forum of which Consules have
not
> yet taken full advantage to communicate with our Citizens, instead
of
> at them, and involve our Citizens in a more collective approach to
> developing the Res Publica Libera.
>
> In the coming year I think you shall see Titus Sabinus and I rely
on
> organization, delegation of responsibility and authority, and
> cooperation between ourselves and with other magistrates to bring
> about a more collective involvement of the leadership of Nova Roma
> and of all interested Citizens. The coming year, 2008, shall be
the
> tenth year since the Founding of Nova Roma. In this Anniversary
Year
> it is time to rekindle in all of our Citizens the Spirit that
first
> brought Nova Roma to light.
>
> Di Deaeque vos semper ament
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52200 From: Titus Iulius Sabinus Date: 2007-11-07
Subject: Re: The Coming Year
SALVE FLAVI AQUILA!

Thank you.
I'm honored to see your efforts in Germania and your effective
contribution to the NR daily life.
You are fine example and I support your candidacy because in my
opinion you belong to those who care and this is the most important
thing.

VALE BENE,
IVL SABINVS


--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "titus.aquila" <titus.aquila@...>
wrote:
> I like your and Titus Sabinus approach very much and hope that you
> will succeed in achieving your goals for the benfit of the Populus
> Nova Romanum.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52201 From: M·CVR·COMPLVTENSIS Date: 2007-11-07
Subject: Provincia Hispania - Edictum Propraetoricium LII (Complutensis XXVI)
Provincia Hispania - Edictum Propraetoricium LII (Complutensis XXVI) de
creatione scribarum

Ex officio Leg Sen Prpr Hispaniae

Ex hoc, cives Quintus Fabius Uranicus (ID#4968) Scriba Ludorum creo.
Nullum ius iurandum poscetur.
Hoc edictum ilico valet.
Datum sub manu mea a.d. VII Idus Nov MMDCCLX


By this edict, I appoint citizen Quintus Fabius Uranicus (ID#4968) as Scriba
Ludorum .
No oath shall be demanded.
This edict takes effect immediately.
Given under my hand this 7th day of November ,2007 C.E.


Por el presente edicto, yo nombro Scriba Ludorum al ciudadano Quintus Fabius
Uranicus (ID#4968)
No se precisa juramento.
Este edicto entra en vigor inmediatamente
Dado a 7 de Noviembre de 2007 C.E.


M·CVRIATIVS·COMPLVTENSIS
TRIBVNVS PLEBIS
LEG·SEN·PRPR·HISPANIAE
SCRIBA CENSORIS CFBM
NOVA ROMA
-------------------------------------------
ex paucis multa, ex minimis maxima

L. Arminio Ti. Galerio Cos
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52202 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2007-11-07
Subject: Re: Changing name
A. Tullia Scholastica C. Arminio Reccanello quiritibus bonae voluntatis
S.P.D.

> GAIVS•ARMINIVS•RECCANELLVS•TRIBVNVS•NOVAE•ROMAE•CIVIBUS•S•P•D
>
> Because Caius isn't the correct spelling of the roman name (the correct is
> Gaius), and according the lex de nominibus mutandis, I inform you that, with
> autorization by Censor Modianus, I changed my praenomen to Gaius.

Congratulations on your name change, which was made for all of the right
reasons. The correct spelling of your praenomen is indeed Gaius, though the
correct abbreviation is C. I would encourage all Roman citizens to use the
correct abbreviations for their praenomina rather than spelling them out,
for that was the Roman practice, and would ask all who do not have names
which conform to the nomenclature legislation to consider bringing their
names into conformity with our laws and previous censorial edicta. Tirones
may change their names at any time during the tirocinium, though full
citizens should confine this to changing their names to reflect correct
Roman nomenclature practices. If there are any questions, one should
consult the Choosing A Roman Name page on the NR wikipedia.
>
> Vale & Valete
> GAIVS•ARMINIVS•RECCANELLVS
> ======================
> TRIBVNVS•PLEBIS•NOVAE•ROMAE
> "Quousque tandem, Lula, abutere patientia nostra?"
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
Vale, et valete.
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52203 From: Bruno Cantermi Date: 2007-11-07
Subject: Re: How To Vote
just a thing, I don't know what is my comitia!

Lucius Fidelius Lusitanus SPD.
----- Original Message -----
From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, November 06, 2007 5:23 PM
Subject: [Nova-Roma] How To Vote


Bruno Cantermi <brunocantermi@...> writes:

> how do I do to vote?

Go to http://www.novaroma.org

Click on the wolf. This will take you to the main page at
http://www.novaroma.org/nr/Main_Page

Find the link for Election MMDCCLX under CURRENT EVENTS. Click on it.

This will take you to
http://www.novaroma.org/nr/Election_MMDCCLX_%28Nova_Roma%29

Follow the directions there. Of continue to read, since I'm going to
copy them here.

1. Carefully check the schedule below for your correct voting
times and comitia.
2. Go to your Album Civium page. Make sure you are logged in via
the box on the right of the screen.
3. Click on "get vote code...".
4. Make a note of your Voter Code. You will need it if there are
problems with your vote.
5. Click on the "go vote" button.
6. Cast your ballots.

CN-EQVIT-MARINVS




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52204 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2007-11-07
Subject: Re: How To Vote
Bruno Cantermi <brunocantermi@...> writes:

> just a thing, I don't know what is my comitia!

It must be the Comitia Plebis Tributa, since that's the only one
voting right now. Later this week we'll see voting open in the other
two Comitia, and at that time you'll want to come back and vote in
them too.

Vale,

CN-EQVIT-MARINVS
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52205 From: M Arminius Maior Date: 2007-11-07
Subject: Re: The Centuria Praerogativa and the Presidium
Salvete novoromani

Attending to the call of our Consul, Tiberius Galerius
Paulinus, the Diribitores chosen, by lot, that the
Centuria Praerogativa will be:
Centuria II
http://www.novaroma.org/civitas/album?cmd=show-century¢ury=2

Valete
Marcus Arminius Maior
Diribitor

--- Stephen Gallagher <spqr753@...> escreveu:

> Salvete Nova Romans
>
> In accordance with my call for the Comitia
> Centuriata I stated that
> during the Contio the Diribitores needed to select
> and announce the
> Centuria Praerogativa.
>
> I call on the Diribitores to announce the Centuria
> Praerogativa
> before the end of the Contio which ends at
> 5:59 PM, Roma time, on 8 November 2760 a.u.c
>
> Also as a reminder in my call for the Comitia Populi
> Tributa
> the Tribe VI: Corneliain was named as the presidium
> (the first tribe to be counted)..
>
> Valete
> Tiberius Galerius Paulinus
> Consul



Abra sua conta no Yahoo! Mail, o único sem limite de espaço para armazenamento!
http://br.mail.yahoo.com/
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52206 From: Bruno Cantermi Date: 2007-11-07
Subject: Re: Flavours, Sweet -- Roman Times -- 3rd Qtr. -- 2007
Vale! it's great!

Lucius Fidelius Lusitanus SPD.
----- Original Message -----
From: James Lee Mathews
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com ; JMath669642reng@...
Sent: Wednesday, November 07, 2007 1:19 PM
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Flavours, Sweet -- Roman Times -- 3rd Qtr. -- 2007




Flavours -- Sweet

The Roman love of honey
has often been mocked.
In Apicius, we often
find it used with meat,
vegetables and fish as
well as in deserts.
Apicius lists thirty-
four sauces for fish,
of which only two are
entirely savory: honey,
syrup, or preserved
fruit is added to the
rest.

Of the four flavors
that we distinguish,
sweet is the most
popular. Animals,
children and the Gods
love sweetness, so why
should adults pretend
to outgrow it? Some
might turn up their
noses at a sauce that
contains a pinch of
sugar, but many a cook
knows that it gives a
lift to many savory
dishes.

----(I have found this
to be true in making
spaghetti sauce and
tomato soup. A little
sweetener enhances the
taste --MA)

Sometimes even the
French combine salty
dishes with sweet
flavours, ham with
honey,

----(as the Romans
did -- see the recent
recipe for Ham and
Figs -- MA)

or cheese with fruit,
for example. The
Romans used sweet
tastes to counter
overpowering
saltiness. Apicius
writes:

"If it is too sweet,
add "garum" (fish
sauce). If it is too
salty add syrup."

Honey (Mel)-----

Bees make honey from
flowers, and honey was
seen by the Romans as a
gift from heaven,
closely related to the
nectar drunk on Mount
Olympus.

One Greek myth has it
that Jupiter
transformed the lovely
Melissa into the first
bee. According to
another, the bee
descended from the
horse-fly, which was
ennobled with the help
of the sun.

There was disagreement
among the Romans about
the reproduction of
bees. Some thought
that bees were able to
reproduce, while others
believed they were born
from rotting beef.
Still others were
convinced that they
came into being in both
ways, or that bees were
born from flowers.
That the queen in each
swarm is the mother of
all it's members was
not discovered until
the 17th century. In
Rome one could buy
bees, receive them as
presents, or plunder
them from newly
conquered territories.
A bee hive could not be
carried on a cart over
long distances because
it would not survive
the jolts. Instead a
slave carried it
carefully by night.

You could also steal
bees from nature.
Country folk had a
clever way of doing
this: the peasants
would close off one end
of a hollow reed and
pour in some honey,
then place it near a
stream where bees came
to drink. When bees
crept into the reed,
attracted by the honey,
the peasant closed off
the opening with his
finger. Then he
allowed a single bee to
escape and followed it
on foot for as long as
he could. Once he was
sure of his trail the
peasant would let a
second bee escape,
continuing until he
found the bee's nest.

----(We find a similar
method in use during
the early colonial days
in North America.
Those who hunted "bee
trees" and sold them to
a town, used "bee
boxes" which held
several bees tempted in
by honey. The "bee
box" had a
small "hatch" that
could release one bee
at a time with a flip
of the finger. The
hunter then followed
the "bee-line" to
the "bee-hive"
somewhere in the
woodlands, usually in a
hollow tree.")

If they lived in a
hollow tree, he felled
it, wrapped it in
clothes and carried it
back to his home.

Every farm had a few
beehives, made of clay,
tree bark, woven twigs
or broom, for the
pollination of fruit
trees and vegetables..
Some farms specialized
in honey production,
and plants were grown
for the benefit of the
bees rather than their
owners. Honey farmers
planted roses, thyme,
rosemary, oregano,
savory, basil, poppy,
lilies, saffron,
celery, beans, lentils,
peas, ivy, and clovers,
such as alfalfa, to
keep their bees
supplied with nectar.
They also planted
trees, such as lime,
peach, almond, oak, and
pine for aromatic
nectar. Honey from
farms that grew mostly
vegetables was
considered inferior.

"One flower results in
a thin honey, like
skirret, another in
thick honey like
rosemary,. While the
fig supplies poor
honey, a good quality
comes from alfalfa, and
the best from thyme."

(Varr. R.R. III-xvi,
26)

At the market honey
cost about the same as
olive oil. The two
products were divided
between similar price-
ranges: just as oil is
available from the
first and second
pressings, and so on,
honey than ran from the
honeycomb was the most
expensive.

Unlike many other
ingredients of Roman
cuisine, we know what
their honey tasted like
because bees still
produce it exactly as
they always have..

(to be continued)

Reference:

P Fass, "Around the
Roman Table,"Univ. of
Chicago Press, 1994, P.
146-148

Respectfully Submitted;

Marcus Audens





[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52207 From: Bruno Cantermi Date: 2007-11-07
Subject: Re: How To Vote
OK.

Lucius Fidelius Lusitanus SPD.
----- Original Message -----
From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, November 07, 2007 6:51 PM
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] How To Vote


Bruno Cantermi <brunocantermi@...> writes:

> just a thing, I don't know what is my comitia!

It must be the Comitia Plebis Tributa, since that's the only one
voting right now. Later this week we'll see voting open in the other
two Comitia, and at that time you'll want to come back and vote in
them too.

Vale,

CN-EQVIT-MARINVS




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52208 From: PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@aol.com Date: 2007-11-07
Subject: Re: auspices
I recently had a conversation with Caeso Fabius Modianus about how I am
putting together augural guide with a new set of augural signs (ex caelo,
oscines, etc.) specific to the central and northern areas of America
Austrorientalis. He thought this was an excellent idea until I mentioned that the first
rule was that pigeons were to be ignored as either an affirmative or negative
sign due to their commonality in this part of the world. He said that since
they are uncommon in northern Ohio, he includes them in his augural signs.
Hey, what can you do. I'm sure that the first time a provincial magistrate took
the auspices in Judea or Brittannia, he had to do some rethinking if he was
from Roma.

Fl. Galerius Aurelianus



************************************** See what's new at http://www.aol.com


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52209 From: PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@aol.com Date: 2007-11-07
Subject: Re: praeturae petitio alius
The Romans loved innovation. They adopted the gods, weapons, farm
implements, theatre, divine images, foods, wines, beers, meads, ships, drinking cups,
dinner services, dining couches, ad infinitum from their friends, allies, and
enemies. The Romans were one of the most adoptive and adaptive people in
the ancient world. All the Romans wanted was Peace, a Roman Peace along with a
little piece of Gaul, a little piece of Germania, most of Britannia, all of
Ptolemic Aegypt, all of Seleucid Persia, Thrace, Greece, Macedonia . . . the
list goes on and on. I love being a Nova Roman.

Fl. Galerius Aurelianus



************************************** See what's new at http://www.aol.com


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52210 From: pompeia_minucia_tiberia Date: 2007-11-07
Subject: Re: Iamdudum petasum ieci
---
Salve A. Tullia Scholastica Praetrix Novae Romae, Salvete Omnes:

In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "A. Tullia Scholastica" <fororom@...>
wrote:
>
> A. Tullia Scholastica quiritibus bonae voluntatis S.P.D.
>
> As legally required, I posted my candidacy for the quaestura to
a public
> Nova Roman forum and to the presiding officer, Consul Paulinus,
some time
> ago. I am now repeating that statement here in this wider forum.

Pompeia: I am truly pleased you are on the roster of Quaestoral
candidates this cista visit.
>
> There is a dearth of candidates, especially for our lower
offices, and
> in recent years it is not unheard-of for long time citizens, even
> magistrates, to seek lower office after a higher one. For the good
of the
> Res Publica I have offered myself as a candidate for this
position. If
> elected, I will serve faithfully and fairly to the best of my
ability, as I
> have in the past. I am currently serving as praetrix and senatrix,
was
> rogatrix last year, have served as consular accensa, praetorian
scriba (two
> terms), censorial scriba (almost three years), and curule
aedilician scriba
> (current and last year). In addition, I am rogatorial scriba, Latin
> interpreter, and praeceptrix of Latin at the Academia Thules.

Pompeia: And I am sure there is even more you have done for NR that
you likely don't even recall....you have freely lent a hand in many
areas, and with distinction. As I've told you privately in the past,
I appreciate your diligence and your academic achievements.
Moreover, I appreciate your willingness to help others achieve
academic excellence. (And you are not getting a prime wage for what
you do, either.) I'm sure I'm not alone in applause. We are
fortunate in that we have some super candidates this year, and I
count you among the ranks. And that you have served in a higher
office and now offer your services as Quaestor, knowing that the
republic is in need, is very commendable. Yet another example of your
dedication to NR.
>
> Valete.

Ave Praetrix

Pompeia
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52211 From: marcushoratius Date: 2007-11-07
Subject: Re: auspices
Salve

I don't know about southern Ohio where Caeso Modianus lives, but up
here in Northeast Ohio pigeons are all too common. I do not include
them as alites or oscines. Solitary birds always take precedence
over a flock of birds, which would generally rule out pigeons
anyway.

You do have to take notice of the birds of your particular location.
I use the eastern blue jay among the oscines because of its behavior
and more so because its high pitched call is easily heard above the
calls of other birds. I also have many of the traditional oscines
and alites, if not quite the same species as you'd find in Europe.

Nigidius mentioned that swans were used in auspicia privita,
eventhough they were not used in the auspicia publica. Swans are not
native here, but there are a few that have gone wild. It would be a
rare day indeed for me to see any over my land, but they do live on
nearby lakes, so it is not impossible, and thus I might consider such
a rare event.

Vale optime
M Moravius Piscinus


--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@... wrote:
>
> I recently had a conversation with Caeso Fabius Modianus about how
I am
> putting together augural guide with a new set of augural signs (ex
caelo,
> oscines, etc.) specific to the central and northern areas of
America
> Austrorientalis. He thought this was an excellent idea until I
mentioned that the first
> rule was that pigeons were to be ignored as either an affirmative
or negative
> sign due to their commonality in this part of the world. He said
that since
> they are uncommon in northern Ohio, he includes them in his
augural signs.
> Hey, what can you do. I'm sure that the first time a provincial
magistrate took
> the auspices in Judea or Brittannia, he had to do some rethinking
if he was
> from Roma.
>
> Fl. Galerius Aurelianus
>
>
>
> ************************************** See what's new at
http://www.aol.com
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52212 From: marcushoratius Date: 2007-11-07
Subject: a. d. VI Eidus Novembris
M. Moravius Piscinus Horatianus Quiritibus et omnibus salutem
plurimam dicit: Di vos servent cum vester.

Hodie est ante diem VI Eidus Novembris; haec dies comitialis et
religiosum est: Mania; mundus patet.

Today is the third time in the year that the mundus is opened, the
other dates being 24 Aug. and 5 Oct. The Mania is thus celebrated
with offerings for the dead. For this reason, too, the day is
regarded as religiousum where it is proper to offer to the Lares and
household gods, as well as to the Manes in general and to the Di
infernes, but it is improper to offer to the celestial Gods.


AUC 690 / 63 BCE Cicero delivers his condemnation of Catalina before
the Senate

"When, O Catiline, do you mean to cease abusing our patience? How
long is that madness of yours still to mock us? When is there to be
an end of that unbridled audacity of yours, swaggering about as it
does now? Do not the nightly guards placed on the Palatine Hill -do
not the watches posted throughout the city--does not the alarm of the
people, and the union of all good men--does not the precaution taken
of assembling the senate in this most defensible place--do not the
looks and countenances of this venerable body here present, have any
effect upon you? Do you not feel that your plans are detected? Do you
not see that your conspiracy is already arrested and rendered
powerless by the knowledge which every one here possesses of it? What
is there that you did last night, what the night before-- where is it
that you were--who was there that you summoned to meet you - what
design was there which was adopted by you, with which you think that
any one of us is unacquainted?

"Shame on the age and on its principles! The senate is aware of these
things; the consul sees them; and yet this man lives. Lives! aye, he
comes even into the senate. He takes a part in the public
deliberations; he is watching and marking down and checking off for
slaughter every individual among us. And we, gallant men that we are,
think that we are doing our duty to the republic if we keep out of
the way of his frenzied attacks. You ought, O Catiline, long ago to
have been led to execution by command of the consul. That destruction
which you have been long plotting against us ought to have already
fallen on your own head.

"What? Did not that most illustrious man, Publius Scipio, the
Pontifex Maximus, in his capacity of a private citizen, put to death
Tiberius Gracchus, though but slightly undermining the constitution?
And shall we, who are the consuls, tolerate Catiline, openly desirous
to destroy the whole world with fire and slaughter? For I pass over
older instances, such as how Caius Servilius Ahala with his own hand
slew Spurius Maelius when plotting a revolution in the state. There
was--there was once such virtue in this republic, that brave men
would repress mischievous citizens with severer chastisement than the
most bitter enemy. For we have a resolution of the senate, a
formidable and authoritative decree against you, O Catiline; the
wisdom of the republic is not at fault, nor the dignity of this
senatorial body. We, we alone,--I say it openly, --we, the consuls,
are waiting in our duty."


AUC 1147 / 392 CE Theodosius bans lararium rites and sacrifices.

"No person at all, whatever class or order of men or office, whether
currently in power or having completed office, whether powerful by
chance of birth or humble in class, legal status, and wealth, shall
sacrifice an innocent victim to insensate images in any place or in
any city; nor shall any one by private sacrifice worship his
household Lar with fire, his Genius with wine, nor his Penates with
incense, nor by lighting candles, burning incense, or hanging wreaths
for them. Â… However if anyone, worshiping with incense, should
venerate images made by human hand and destined to suffer the ravage
of time, or should he, suddenly filled with awe of what he himself
has made, seeks to honor them either by adorning a tree in garlands
with sacred ribbons, by erecting an altar of turf, or attempt to give
an offering, however small, though it is still an insult to religion,
since he is guilty of the violation of (Christian) religion he shall
forfeit his house and his holdings in which he is proved to have been
a slave to heathen superstition. For we decree that all places that
prove to have reeked with the smell of incense shall be united with
our treasury, if they are shown to have belonged by law to those
burning incense." ~ Codex Theodosi 16.10.12


The thought for today is from Epictetus, Enchiridion 21

"Let death and exile, and all other things which appear terrible, be
daily before your eyes, but death chiefly; and you will never
entertain any abject thought, not too eagerly covet anything."
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52213 From: pompeia_minucia_tiberia Date: 2007-11-07
Subject: Re: auspices
---Salve Marce Moravi Piscine, Salvete Omnes:

Curiosity, if I may:

What about eagles? I would imagine favourable, but given their
reverence by the Romans, and their less common sitings (they are so
high flying and don't exactly nest in backyard trees :>)) would their
appearance in an augry have an extra special significance?



Thanks in advance,
Pompeia


In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "marcushoratius" <mhoratius@...> wrote:
>
> Salve
>
> I don't know about southern Ohio where Caeso Modianus lives, but up
> here in Northeast Ohio pigeons are all too common. I do not
include
> them as alites or oscines. Solitary birds always take precedence
> over a flock of birds, which would generally rule out pigeons
> anyway.
>
> You do have to take notice of the birds of your particular
location.
> I use the eastern blue jay among the oscines because of its
behavior
> and more so because its high pitched call is easily heard above the
> calls of other birds. I also have many of the traditional oscines
> and alites, if not quite the same species as you'd find in Europe.
>
> Nigidius mentioned that swans were used in auspicia privita,
> eventhough they were not used in the auspicia publica. Swans are
not
> native here, but there are a few that have gone wild. It would be
a
> rare day indeed for me to see any over my land, but they do live on
> nearby lakes, so it is not impossible, and thus I might consider
such
> a rare event.
>
> Vale optime
> M Moravius Piscinus
>
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@ wrote:
> >
> > I recently had a conversation with Caeso Fabius Modianus about
how
> I am
> > putting together augural guide with a new set of augural signs
(ex
> caelo,
> > oscines, etc.) specific to the central and northern areas of
> America
> > Austrorientalis. He thought this was an excellent idea until I
> mentioned that the first
> > rule was that pigeons were to be ignored as either an
affirmative
> or negative
> > sign due to their commonality in this part of the world. He
said
> that since
> > they are uncommon in northern Ohio, he includes them in his
> augural signs.
> > Hey, what can you do. I'm sure that the first time a provincial
> magistrate took
> > the auspices in Judea or Brittannia, he had to do some
rethinking
> if he was
> > from Roma.
> >
> > Fl. Galerius Aurelianus
> >
> >
> >
> > ************************************** See what's new at
> http://www.aol.com
> >
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52214 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2007-11-07
Subject: Re: praeturae petitio alius
>
> A. Tullia Scholastica Flavio Galerio Aureliano quiritibus bonae voluntatis
> S.P.D.
>
>
> The Romans loved innovation. They adopted the gods, weapons, farm
> implements, theatre, divine images, foods, wines, beers, meads, ships,
> drinking cups,
> dinner services, dining couches, ad infinitum from their friends, allies, and
> enemies.
>
> ATS: Add to that their clothing, since the toga itself seems to have been
> borrowed from Etruria, along with those haruspices. However, social
> innovation did not seem to be one of their very favorite things.
>
> The Romans were one of the most adoptive and adaptive people in
> the ancient world. All the Romans wanted was Peace, a Roman Peace along with
> a
> little piece of Gaul, a little piece of Germania, most of Britannia, all of
> Ptolemic Aegypt, all of Seleucid Persia, Thrace, Greece, Macedonia . . . the
> list goes on and on.
>
> ATS: Indeed, the Romans were a very pieceful people. A little piece o¹
> this, a big piece o¹ that...now why can¹t we get some pieces that are better
> than $200 of Texan pasture land (if it can be used as pasture land...if so,
> why not rent it out?).
>
>
> I love being a Nova Roman.
>
> ATS: Lots of us do.
>
>
> Fl. Galerius Aurelianus
>
> Vale, et valete.
>
>
>



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52215 From: C. Curius Saturninus Date: 2007-11-07
Subject: LUDI PLEBEII TODAY
Salvete omnes,

Q. Caecilius Metellus will today post more information about today's
main event: the Mundus patet.

I just want to remind you, that today is the last day to send in your
Literary Contest piece, see more information at:
http://www.novaroma.org/nr/LudiPlebeii_Literary_Contest

And also today is the last day to send in your fighters for munera,
again more information at:
http://www.novaroma.org/nr/LudiPlebeii_Gladiators_Subscription

Valete,

C. Curius Saturninus
(Mikko Sillanpää)

Senator - Aedilis Plebis - Propraetor Provinciae Thules
Rector Academia Thules ad Studia Romana Antiqua et Nova

e-mail: c.curius@...
www.academiathules.org
thule.novaroma.org




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52216 From: C. Curius Saturninus Date: 2007-11-07
Subject: Re: Digest Number 3651
Salve,

Well, actually it has to be said that we do not have enough evidence
to say that during monarchy or during the early centuries of republic
the spelling Caius would have not been used. For example as late as
third century BC (if I remember correctly), the spelling Caia for
female name Gaia was in use at least in the burial monuments (See
more from Kajava's Female praenomina book). And we must remember that
the invention of letter G is commonly attributed to happen at 200's
BC. Certainly in later times the G was always used with those both
names, but since the abbreviation remaind as C. I think we could very
safely assume that the form Caius has indeed existed also in writing
at some point, for us simply there hasn't been any surviving and
found inscriptions to support this.

Vale,

On 8.11.2007, at 4:31, Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com wrote:

> 4a. Changing name
> Posted by: "C•ARMINIVS•RECCANELLVS"
> c.arminius.reccanellus@... caius_arminius_reccanellus
> Date: Wed Nov 7, 2007 7:47 am ((PST))
>
> GAIVS•ARMINIVS•RECCANELLVS•TRIBVNVS•NOVAE•ROMAE•CIVIBUS•S•P•D
>
> Because Caius isn't the correct spelling of the roman name (the
> correct is Gaius), and according the lex de nominibus mutandis, I
> inform you that, with autorization by Censor Modianus, I changed my
> praenomen to Gaius.
>
> Vale & Valete
> GAIVS•ARMINIVS•RECCANELLVS
> ======================
> TRIBVNVS•PLEBIS•NOVAE•ROMAE
> "Quousque tandem, Lula, abutere patientia nostra?"
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>

C. Curius Saturninus
(Mikko Sillanpää)

Senator - Aedilis Plebis - Propraetor Provinciae Thules
Rector Academia Thules ad Studia Romana Antiqua et Nova

e-mail: c.curius@...
www.academiathules.org
thule.novaroma.org
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52217 From: Maior Date: 2007-11-07
Subject: Re: auspices
M.Hortensia Fl. Galerio M.Horatio spd:
what an excellent & practical idea Aureliane. I'd llke to
contribute this link to the Cornell Ornithology Library
http://www.birds.cornell.edu/macaulaylibrary/Search/
Free bird song recordings.
it could be a way to encourage magistrates & cives to take public
and private auspices.
Marca Hortensia Maior


>
> I recently had a conversation with Caeso Fabius Modianus about how
I am
> putting together augural guide with a new set of augural signs (ex
caelo,
> oscines, etc.) specific to the central and northern areas of
America
> Austrorientalis. He thought this was an excellent idea until I
mentioned that the first
> rule was that pigeons were to be ignored as either an affirmative
or negative
> sign due to their commonality in this part of the world. He said
that since
> they are uncommon in northern Ohio, he includes them in his
augural signs.
> Hey, what can you do. I'm sure that the first time a provincial
magistrate took
> the auspices in Judea or Brittannia, he had to do some rethinking
if he was
> from Roma.
>
> Fl. Galerius Aurelianus
>
>
>
> ************************************** See what's new at
http://www.aol.com
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52218 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2007-11-07
Subject: Re: Iamdudum petasum ieci
> A. Tullia Scholastica Pompeiae Minuciae Tiberiae quiritibus bonae voluntatis
> S.P.D.
>
>
>
>
> Salve A. Tullia Scholastica Praetrix Novae Romae, Salvete Omnes:
>
> In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com <mailto:Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com> , "A. Tullia
> Scholastica" <fororom@...>
> wrote:
>> >
>> > A. Tullia Scholastica quiritibus bonae voluntatis S.P.D.
>> >
>> > As legally required, I posted my candidacy for the quaestura to
> a public
>> > Nova Roman forum and to the presiding officer, Consul Paulinus,
> some time
>> > ago. I am now repeating that statement here in this wider forum.
>
> Pompeia: I am truly pleased you are on the roster of Quaestoral
> candidates this cista visit.
>
> ATS: Gratias. Equidem laetor.
>
>> >
>> > There is a dearth of candidates, especially for our lower
> offices, and
>> > in recent years it is not unheard-of for long time citizens, even
>> > magistrates, to seek lower office after a higher one. For the good
> of the
>> > Res Publica I have offered myself as a candidate for this
> position. If
>> > elected, I will serve faithfully and fairly to the best of my
> ability, as I
>> > have in the past. I am currently serving as praetrix and senatrix,
> was
>> > rogatrix last year, have served as consular accensa, praetorian
> scriba (two
>> > terms), censorial scriba (almost three years), and curule
> aedilician scriba
>> > (current and last year). In addition, I am rogatorial scriba, Latin
>> > interpreter, and praeceptrix of Latin at the Academia Thules.
>
> Pompeia: And I am sure there is even more you have done for NR that
> you likely don't even recall....you have freely lent a hand in many
> areas, and with distinction.
>
> ATS: Plurimas gratias! In fact, I do recall quite a few other
> things...proofreading every law in the Tabularium twice, proofreading the main
> website...
>
> As I've told you privately in the past,
> I appreciate your diligence and your academic achievements.
>
> ATS: Again, thank you very much.
>
>
> Moreover, I appreciate your willingness to help others achieve
> academic excellence.
>
> ATS: Some of my students have done reasonably well, anyway...in the upper
> 80s and 90s...whereupon a couple have gone on to face Avitus.
>
>
>
> (And you are not getting a prime wage for what
> you do, either.)
>
> ATS: Wage? What wage? Salary? Whazzat? The AT pay genuine money?
> Most of my students seem to like me, though...even when copious amounts of red
> ink adorn their papers. That¹s how one learns.
>
>
> I'm sure I'm not alone in applause. We are
> fortunate in that we have some super candidates this year, and I
> count you among the ranks.
>
> ATS: Typically we have some very fine candidates...and some who aren¹t, as
> well as the middling ones, and the untested ones. We hope that all candidates
> are in fact suited for the posts they seek (as may not be the case), and that
> elected candidates show up to take their oaths of office (and you and I recall
> one who did not) and perform their duties (several in that category, not to
> mention the resignations...). Thank you again for your compliments.
>
>
> And that you have served in a higher
> office and now offer your services as Quaestor, knowing that the
> republic is in need, is very commendable. Yet another example of your
> dedication to NR.
>
> ATS: There was a very fine precedent last year when consularis Marinus
> did just that...and then, if memory serves, we had an even bigger complement
> of candidates for the quaestura, if a deficient one.
>
>> > Valete.
>
> Ave Praetrix
>
> Ave consularis!
>
> Pompeia
>> >

Vale, et valete.



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52219 From: vallenporter Date: 2007-11-08
Subject: Re: auspices
--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "pompeia_minucia_tiberia"
<pompeia_minucia_tiberia@...> wrote:
>
>
Salvete!
I get here in Provincia America Boreoccidentalis all the following
common Bubo Virginianus, Nyctea scandiaca, Nyctiocorax Nyctiocorax,
Cygnus columbianus,

as Uncommon

Falco peregrinue, Aix sponsa, Casmerodius albus, Haliaeetus
leucocephalus, Accipiter gentilis, Accipiter cooperii,
Plegadis chihi , Ardea herodias, Aegolius acadicus Falco
columbarius, Pandion haliaetus , Tyto alba, Cygnus cygnus,


as for Rare I get about here the following

Strix nebulosa, Otus asio, Otus fammeolus,


Vale
M.C. Felix
---Salve Marce Moravi Piscine, Salvete Omnes:
>
> Curiosity, if I may:
>
> What about eagles? I would imagine favourable, but given their
> reverence by the Romans, and their less common sitings (they are so
> high flying and don't exactly nest in backyard trees :>)) would their
> appearance in an augry have an extra special significance?
>
>
>
> Thanks in advance,
> Pompeia
>
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52220 From: titus.aquila Date: 2007-11-08
Subject: Re: The Coming Year
SALVE IULIUS SABINUS !

Thank you very much for your compliments, I am flattered.

I am sure that together we can achieve the best for Nova Roma, our
beloved Republic !

I am convinced , that with yours and Marcus Moravius Piscinus
leadership we will see a very successful 10th year of Nova Roma.

Titus Flavius Aquila
Scriba Censoris GFBM
Tribunus Plebis Candidatus



--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Titus Iulius Sabinus"
<iulius_sabinus@...> wrote:
>
> SALVE FLAVI AQUILA!
>
> Thank you.
> I'm honored to see your efforts in Germania and your effective
> contribution to the NR daily life.
> You are fine example and I support your candidacy because in my
> opinion you belong to those who care and this is the most
important
> thing.
>
> VALE BENE,
> IVL SABINVS
>
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "titus.aquila" <titus.aquila@>
> wrote:
> > I like your and Titus Sabinus approach very much and hope that
you
> > will succeed in achieving your goals for the benfit of the
Populus
> > Nova Romanum.
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52221 From: titus.aquila Date: 2007-11-08
Subject: The coming year , the 10th year of Nova Roma
Salvete Quirites !

With the coming year ,the 10th year of Nova Roma, we should start
collecting ideas for the celebration.

As much as I would like that we all gather for an annual meeting to
celebrate face to face, this might not be possible for everybody,
that's why I come up with the following idea:

Let's produce a Video Broadcast for 2761 A.U.C. thus all citizens
worldwide can contribute and participate. How about this ?

Valete
Titus Flavius Aquila
Scriba Censoris GFBM
Tribunus Plebis Candidatus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52222 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2007-11-08
Subject: Magistratuum munera convenientiaque petitorum
>>>
>>> A. Tullia Scholastica M. Hortensiae quiritibusque bonae voluntatis S.P.D.
>>>
>>>
>>> M. Hortensia Quiritibus spd;
>>> I am withdrawing from the race for praetor and instead am
>>> campaigning for Censor. I am too happy to see cives from Provincia
>>> Hispania and Mexico running for office:) May Fortuna favour you!
>>>
>>> Now it is unorthodox to skip the cursus honorum
>>>
>>> ATS: Presumably that is how we grow in our Romanitas. Others, however,
>>> have been sternly rebuked for far less adventurous leaps up the ladder we
>>> call the cursus honorum. Where is Cordus when we need him?
>>>
>>>
>>> but here are my
>>> reasons:
>>> Censors in Nova Roma are responsible for admitting new cives
>>> with the proper names. I worked with Censor Quintilianus Buteo
>>>
>>> ATS: If I am not mistaken, our former censor¹s name is Caeso Fabius
>>> Buteo Quintilianus, not Quintilianus Buteo.
>>>
>>>
>>> and
>>> the nomenclature cohors on this very project which he began. Our
>>> current censor his stepson, can confirm this was a lot of hard work!
>>>
>>> ATS: And so can some others here. That¹s why we have so many
>>> applicants for the rogatura and citizens banging on the doors of the
>>> censor¹s office begging to be scribae ;-) (not).
>>>
>>>
>>> Wondeful work and very gratifying.
>>>
>>> ATS: Indeed it is.
>>>
>>>
>>> But I loved nomenclature and even after Gaius Quintilianus
>>> Buteo's
>>>
>>> ATS: Did former censor Quintilianus change his praenomen and the order
>>> of his names? Methought it was Modianus who changed his, but after your
>>> original post, as well as from Gaius, not to Gaius.
>>>
>>> MHM: term as censor was over I served on the Onomalis list, with
>>> the other experts for no titles or points to continue work &
>>> research on Roman nomenclature.
>>>
>>> ATS: And you did some very fine research there, while managing to abuse
>>> a different censor so viciously that he left the list.
>>>
>>>
>>> MHM: The other important work of the censor is as regulator of the mos
>>> maiorum, regimen morum.
>>>
>>> ATS: And for that one must have a sense of propriety. One must have a
>>> natural moral sense. One must know what is appropriate, and when and where
>>> it is appropriate. One must know that private business of one group should
>>> not be posted to another; one must know that certain material is suitable
>>> for certain audiences, but not for others, and one must know that some
>>> things are absolutely beyond the pale at all times. One must be sensitive
>>> to others, and their beliefs, which, of course, requires that one know what
>>> those beliefs are, and honor them, not scold and ridicule people for being
>>> less libertarian or what have you than oneself. It requires good control of
>>> one¹s emotions and freedom from vindictiveness, inter alia.
>>>
>>> In Nova Roma, the censor has access to the private information about
>>> every citizen, both full and probationary. The censor and censorial scribae
>>> (and supposedly the rogatores) can access the macro names, addresses,
>>> birthdates, voter codes, tribe and century assignments, and a host of other
>>> information about everyone in Nova Roma, and perhaps former citizens as
>>> well. The censores can also create gentes, and rule on the suitability of
>>> names. Those who have this awesome responsibility must not misuse this
>>> information or these powers. They must not take out their personal
>>> animosities on other citizens by altering those data, or otherwise abusing
>>> them. Anyone who in fits of temper (or otherwise) cross posts material from
>>> an SIG to this or other lists, or vice versa, for personal or political gain
>>> in particular does not appear suited to hold that office, nor does anyone
>>> who cannot discern right from wrong, nor does anyone who lashes out in hissy
>>> fits. Such a person should not be allowed within twenty feet of the
>>> censorial database. The censura, like the praetura, demands a calm, moral,
>>> fair individual. We have a candidate who appears to fulfill those
>>> requirements, but it isn¹t you.
>>>
>>> MHM: But what is the mos maiorum?
>>>
>>> This is another great & wonderful area of interest. To help develop
>>> an understanding of Romanitas and begin to live it in our daily
>>> lives. Not only for myself but for all cives here.
>>>
>>> So quirites these are my reasons, I am fortunate to have access to
>>> the University of Carolina's excellent classics collection & getting
>>> a good reading knowledge of Latin.
>>>
>>> ATS: I hope I live to see the day when you (and many more of our
>>> citizens) do get a reading knowledge of Latin. It will have been a long
>>> time coming under numerous instructors, including one who is one of the
>>> world¹s best at that. Hopefully like other students who have gotten that
>>> far, you can now distinguish passives from deponents and supines from
>>> perfect participles as well as write Roman numerals, and will eventually
>>> manage to learn enough of the beautiful and solemn Latin language that you
>>> can read, say, Cicero or Horace or Vergil. It will take time and effort for
>>> you or anyone else, but learning the language of the Romans is an important
>>> element of Romanitas, and one all of us should try to do.
>>>
>>>
>>> As evidenced by my past work for
>>> the NRwiki, I will share, write articles and post so that Nova Roma
>>> can progress and become truly Roman.
>>> May the gods watch over Rome
>>> and the Roman people!
>>> Marca Hortensia Maior
>>> http://www.novaroma.org/civitas/album?id=5832
>>>
> Di nos protegant!
>
> Valete.
>




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52223 From: GAIVS IVLIANVS Date: 2007-11-08
Subject: Wanting contact from Marcvs Cassivs Ivlianvs!
Salvete Omnes! This Gaivs Ivlivs Ivlianvs and I am
wanting to hear from Marcvs Cassivs Ivlianvs! The
email I have for him is cassius622@... and I
don't know IF this is still valid for him? Cassie, if
you read this please contact me! Gratias tibi ago!
Vale! Gaivs Ivlianvs

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52224 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2007-11-08
Subject: Re: Wanting contact from Marcvs Cassivs Ivlianvs!
Salve Gai Iuliane,

Yes, that's the correct e-mail address for him.

Vale,

CN-EQVIT-MARINVS

GAIVS IVLIANVS <ivlianvs309@...> writes:

> Salvete Omnes! This Gaivs Ivlivs Ivlianvs and I am
> wanting to hear from Marcvs Cassivs Ivlianvs! The
> email I have for him is cassius622@... and I
> don't know IF this is still valid for him? Cassie, if
> you read this please contact me! Gratias tibi ago!
> Vale! Gaivs Ivlianvs
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52225 From: Sebastian José Molina Palacios Date: 2007-11-08
Subject: Re: praeturae petitio alius
I think it´s right what you say, but, anyway, there´s something the ancient Romans didn´t adopt: the love for sciences and scientific advances. Ancient Greeks got great achievements in maths, medicine, physics, astronomy, etc. and what to say about the Library of Alexandria. Romans were good in engineering and not much more. what had happened if Romans had begun the industrial revolution? But, in this case, tradition was more powerful for them and they prefered to go on with slavery than use machines.
Many years ago, when i was at the High School, a teacher of Phisycs told us: "if Romans had begun the industrial revolution, now we would be coming from stars". I don´t know if that is very exaggerated, but it made me think and dream.

Quintus Livius Drusus.

"A. Tullia Scholastica" <fororom@...> escribió:
>
> A. Tullia Scholastica Flavio Galerio Aureliano quiritibus bonae voluntatis
> S.P.D.
>
>
> The Romans loved innovation. They adopted the gods, weapons, farm
> implements, theatre, divine images, foods, wines, beers, meads, ships,
> drinking cups,
> dinner services, dining couches, ad infinitum from their friends, allies, and
> enemies.
>
> ATS: Add to that their clothing, since the toga itself seems to have been
> borrowed from Etruria, along with those haruspices. However, social
> innovation did not seem to be one of their very favorite things.
>
> The Romans were one of the most adoptive and adaptive people in
> the ancient world. All the Romans wanted was Peace, a Roman Peace along with
> a
> little piece of Gaul, a little piece of Germania, most of Britannia, all of
> Ptolemic Aegypt, all of Seleucid Persia, Thrace, Greece, Macedonia . . . the
> list goes on and on.
>
> ATS: Indeed, the Romans were a very pieceful people. A little piece o¹
> this, a big piece o¹ that...now why can¹t we get some pieces that are better
> than $200 of Texan pasture land (if it can be used as pasture land...if so,
> why not rent it out?).
>
>
> I love being a Nova Roman.
>
> ATS: Lots of us do.
>
>
> Fl. Galerius Aurelianus
>
> Vale, et valete.
>
>
>

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]






---------------------------------

Comparte video en la ventana de tus mensajes (y también tus fotos de Flickr).
Usa el nuevo Yahoo! Messenger versión Beta.
Visita http://e1.beta.messenger.yahoo.com/

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52226 From: David Kling (Modianus) Date: 2007-11-08
Subject: Re: Wanting contact from Marcvs Cassivs Ivlianvs!
Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus Gaio Iulio Iuliano salutem dicit

That is still his e-mail address that I am aware. If you contact him
remind him that Nova Roma still exists.

Vale:

Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus

On Nov 8, 2007 9:48 AM, GAIVS IVLIANVS <ivlianvs309@...> wrote:
>
> Salvete Omnes! This Gaivs Ivlivs Ivlianvs and I am
> wanting to hear from Marcvs Cassivs Ivlianvs! The
> email I have for him is cassius622@... and I
> don't know IF this is still valid for him? Cassie, if
> you read this please contact me! Gratias tibi ago!
> Vale! Gaivs Ivlianvs
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52227 From: Annia Minucia Marcella Date: 2007-11-08
Subject: Re: Wanting contact from Marcvs Cassivs Ivlianvs!
Hehe, no kidding.

-Annia Minucia Marcella



----- Original Message -----
From: David Kling (Modianus)
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2007 11:07 AM
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Wanting contact from Marcvs Cassivs Ivlianvs!


Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus Gaio Iulio Iuliano salutem dicit

That is still his e-mail address that I am aware. If you contact him
remind him that Nova Roma still exists.

Vale:

Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus

On Nov 8, 2007 9:48 AM, GAIVS IVLIANVS <ivlianvs309@...> wrote:
>
> Salvete Omnes! This Gaivs Ivlivs Ivlianvs and I am
> wanting to hear from Marcvs Cassivs Ivlianvs! The
> email I have for him is cassius622@... and I
> don't know IF this is still valid for him? Cassie, if
> you read this please contact me! Gratias tibi ago!
> Vale! Gaivs Ivlianvs




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52228 From: Caius Aemilius Crassus Date: 2007-11-08
Subject: Missing one candidate for Curule Aedile in the Election Page.
C. Aemilius Crassus omnibus SPD,

Although in the message from the Consul Ti. Galerius
Paulinus calling the Comitia Populi Tributa there are
two candidates for Curule Aedile, in the election page
of NR only appear one, Publius Memmius Albucius.

Is Sextus Lucillius Tutor a valid candidate for Curule
Aedile or not?

Di vos incolumes custodiant.


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52229 From: Publius Memmius Albucius Date: 2007-11-08
Subject: Re: Missing one candidate for Curule Aedile in the Election Page (NO
P. Memmius Albucius C. Aemilio Crasso s.d.

Yes, I have already, privately, informed our consul of this situation.

If I am not wrong, Honorable Lucillius has unfortunately not sent his
candidacy in this forum (main list).
So, according the call for candidates issued by Consul Galerius (#
51756) who required that any candidacy be registered in the consul
mail box and on this list, Lucillius's candidacy is not valid (unless
I missed his message!!!). So the fact that his name be not in the
election page set up by our Magister Aranearius is not a mistake, but
a correct application of the law, imho.

If I am still not wrong (?), Consul Galerius should have modified his
call to take into account this situation.

It is the same case, indeed, that lived several days ago current
Praetor Equitius who did not present his candidacy for consul in this
list : he could not unfortunately being registered as a valid
candidate. As his name had been, at a first time, uncorrectly written
down in Consul Galerius's call, the consul has brought the needed
correction (this list message # 52034).

I think that the consul will fix this error as soon as possible.


Vale Aemili,


P. Memmius Albucius
Candidatus AEDILIS CUR.


--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Caius Aemilius Crassus
<septemtrionis@...> wrote:
>
> C. Aemilius Crassus omnibus SPD,
>
> Although in the message from the Consul Ti. Galerius
> Paulinus calling the Comitia Populi Tributa there are
> two candidates for Curule Aedile, in the election page
> of NR only appear one, Publius Memmius Albucius.
>
> Is Sextus Lucillius Tutor a valid candidate for Curule
> Aedile or not?
>
> Di vos incolumes custodiant.
>
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> http://mail.yahoo.com
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52230 From: Caius Aemilius Crassus Date: 2007-11-08
Subject: Small mistake in the cista of Comitia Populi Tributa.
C. Aemilius Crassus omnibus SPD,

There is a small mistake in the cista for the
elections in the Comitia Populi Tributa. In the
section for voting for Diribitores it is stated that
there are 2 positions, when it should be 4.

What can I say; I always liked to vote earlier.

Di vos incolumes custodiant.


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52231 From: Caius Aemilius Crassus Date: 2007-11-08
Subject: Re: Missing one candidate for Curule Aedile in the Election Page (NO
C. Aemilius Crassus P. Memmio Albucio omnibusque SPD,

My doubts were due to the fact that I couldnÂ’t found
neither the Candidacy declarion of Lucillius or the
correction from the Consul.

Di vos incolumes custodiant.

--- Publius Memmius Albucius
<albucius_aoe@...> wrote:

> P. Memmius Albucius C. Aemilio Crasso s.d.
>
> Yes, I have already, privately, informed our consul
> of this situation.
>
> If I am not wrong, Honorable Lucillius has
> unfortunately not sent his
> candidacy in this forum (main list).
> So, according the call for candidates issued by
> Consul Galerius (#
> 51756) who required that any candidacy be registered
> in the consul
> mail box and on this list, Lucillius's candidacy is
> not valid (unless
> I missed his message!!!). So the fact that his name
> be not in the
> election page set up by our Magister Aranearius is
> not a mistake, but
> a correct application of the law, imho.
>
> If I am still not wrong (?), Consul Galerius should
> have modified his
> call to take into account this situation.
>
> It is the same case, indeed, that lived several days
> ago current
> Praetor Equitius who did not present his candidacy
> for consul in this
> list : he could not unfortunately being registered
> as a valid
> candidate. As his name had been, at a first time,
> uncorrectly written
> down in Consul Galerius's call, the consul has
> brought the needed
> correction (this list message # 52034).
>
> I think that the consul will fix this error as soon
> as possible.
>
>
> Vale Aemili,
>
>
> P. Memmius Albucius
> Candidatus AEDILIS CUR.
>
>

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52232 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2007-11-08
Subject: Attention Voters
Voting has begun in both the Comitia Plebis Tributa and the Comitia
Centuriata. HOWEVER, only the members of the Centuria Praerogativa
(in this case century II) may vote today. Unless you are in Century
II, do not cast a ballot in the Comitia Centuriata. If you do, it
will be invalid.

CN-EQVIT-MARINVS
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52233 From: Caius Aemilius Crassus Date: 2007-11-08
Subject: Missing the Curulis Aedilis in the Cista of the Comitia Populi Tribu
C. Aemilius Crassus omnibus SPD,

IÂ’m sorry to be bothering again, but I also donÂ’t find
neither the candidate(s) for Curule Aedile or even the
position for the office in the cista of the Comitia
Populi Tributa.

Di vos incolumes cutodiant.


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52234 From: marcushoratius Date: 2007-11-08
Subject: Re: auspices
Salva sis, cara Pompeia

There is only one known pair of eagles nesting in northern Ohio
today. They are in a park about 2o miles north from where I live. I
have seen them once, high above fittingly in the northeast quadrant,
that of Jupiter. I needed binoculars to make sure that they were
indeed eagles. That was very significant, considering that I was at
the time performing an auspicium.

Now in Minnesota you needed a broom to chase the eagles away; there
were so many along the banks of the Mississippi, even inside the Twin
cities. In that case, as with other birds that may be more common in
your area, you would have to be familiar with their habits. If you
took note of something unusual fron their normal habits, and
you "intuit," as Cicero said, that this was a sign, then it would
hold significance.

This really holds true for all signs. It is not just a
mechanical "taking of auspicia." There is rituals that comes into
play, sacrificing first at the altars for the Lares and then for the
celestial Gods as They arrive at dawn, then at each of the outlying
eight stations, then at the central seat of Silvanus. Performing all
of these rituals will place you into a ritual conscious where your
awareness is unlike your day to day consciousness and you must rely
on both your intuition and rationality. Only what you "feel" to be a
sign, heard or seen, is a sign. If an eagle came down and landed at
your feet and for some strange reason you did not think this anything
unsual as to be a sign, then it is not. OTOH the most common bird,
doing the most normal thing, even though not generally recognized
among the alites or oscines, could be taken as a sign. But then it
would be among the oblativa.

There are two categories of signs. Imperativa are those that you
designate beforehand as signs you will accept as a direct message
from the Gods. Thus after designating the boundaries of your
celestial templum you say, "I shall accept the eagle, the owl, the
woodpecker and all the traditional birds of aupiscia as my alites and
oscines, but I shall not accept the flight of a swan or the call of a
chickadee." There you have designated your imperativa. Oblativa are
signs that can arrive any time you offer sacrifice. They do not have
to be specified; they are not necessarily part of an auspicium. They
are not actually part of the auspicium proper, the signs you take,
but oblativa are used to confirm what has been been learned in an
auspicium. So oblativa have more to do with synchronicity, where an
ordinary event takes on a significant subjective meaning.

The classic tale used by Romans to explain oblativa was that of
Aemilius Paullus and his daughter.

"What of that which befell Consul L. Paullus, how memorable! It had
fallen to him by lot to conduct the war against king Perses.
Returning home from the Senate house, he noticed that his little
daughter called Tertia, a very small child (admodum parvula) at the
time, seemed sad when he gave her a kiss. To his question, why she
looked so sad, she answered that 'Persa perissa' (Persa had
perished). Now a puppy called Persa, the child's favorite, had
died. So Paullus seized upon the omen and from a chance saying
conceived a sure hope of a splendid triumph." ~ Valerius Maximus 1.5.3

There are three important factors in this story, repeated in another
version. First is the synchronicity of the even between what had
happened in the Senate and what the girl said; secondly the fact that
she was "a very small child at the time," because like birds small
children, innocent and pure, were considered very close to the Gods,
and then thirdly is the fact that Paullus himself took this as an
omen. He "seized it" (arripuit), or "quickly learned" from this,
instantly, that it was not mere chance that the lot had fallen to
him, but the Gods gave him a clear sign confirming that it was Their
will for him to lead the army against Perses.

Now then, there were different eagles used in Roman augury. Pliny
names six kinds of eagles, of which one is actually a vulture. Only
one though was the totem of Jupiter Optimus Maximus as the God of
sovereignty, and thus represented the highest auctoras. The eagle is
most significant since it is the bird of Jupiter. It takes
precedence over all other alites, which have precedence over
oscines. This is in part because it flies higher than all other
birds, thus it is closer to the Gods, and it circles, which takes
precedence over the straight flight of birds, and, although far
above, its call can be heard over that of all other birds, and thus
it is also considered among the oscines and takes precedence over all
the rest. Where it flies, in what direction and whether high or low,
or the direction it calls from, is what would determine the
significance of the presence of an eagle. The only signs that are
more significant than the appearance of an eagle would be certain
kinds of thunder and lightning. And no matter what such signs may be
thought to convey, they would have to be confirmed by other signs,
and then by oblativa in order to get a ful interpretation of the
auspicia.

Like Aurelianus said, and Hortensia, too, it's complicated to explain
everything and it takes some practice to get a feel for the art of
auspicia.

Vale et vade in Deos

M Moravius Piscinus



--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "pompeia_minucia_tiberia"
<pompeia_minucia_tiberia@...> wrote:
>
> ---Salve Marce Moravi Piscine, Salvete Omnes:
>
> Curiosity, if I may:
>
> What about eagles? I would imagine favourable, but given their
> reverence by the Romans, and their less common sitings (they are so
> high flying and don't exactly nest in backyard trees :>)) would
their
> appearance in an augry have an extra special significance?
>
>
>
> Thanks in advance,
> Pompeia
>
>
> In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "marcushoratius" <mhoratius@> wrote:
> >
> > Salve
> >
> > I don't know about southern Ohio where Caeso Modianus lives, but
up
> > here in Northeast Ohio pigeons are all too common. I do not
> include
> > them as alites or oscines. Solitary birds always take precedence
> > over a flock of birds, which would generally rule out pigeons
> > anyway.
> >
> > You do have to take notice of the birds of your particular
> location.
> > I use the eastern blue jay among the oscines because of its
> behavior
> > and more so because its high pitched call is easily heard above
the
> > calls of other birds. I also have many of the traditional
oscines
> > and alites, if not quite the same species as you'd find in Europe.
> >
> > Nigidius mentioned that swans were used in auspicia privita,
> > eventhough they were not used in the auspicia publica. Swans are
> not
> > native here, but there are a few that have gone wild. It would
be
> a
> > rare day indeed for me to see any over my land, but they do live
on
> > nearby lakes, so it is not impossible, and thus I might consider
> such
> > a rare event.
> >
> > Vale optime
> > M Moravius Piscinus
> >
> >
> > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@ wrote:
> > >
> > > I recently had a conversation with Caeso Fabius Modianus about
> how
> > I am
> > > putting together augural guide with a new set of augural signs
> (ex
> > caelo,
> > > oscines, etc.) specific to the central and northern areas of
> > America
> > > Austrorientalis. He thought this was an excellent idea until I
> > mentioned that the first
> > > rule was that pigeons were to be ignored as either an
> affirmative
> > or negative
> > > sign due to their commonality in this part of the world. He
> said
> > that since
> > > they are uncommon in northern Ohio, he includes them in his
> > augural signs.
> > > Hey, what can you do. I'm sure that the first time a
provincial
> > magistrate took
> > > the auspices in Judea or Brittannia, he had to do some
> rethinking
> > if he was
> > > from Roma.
> > >
> > > Fl. Galerius Aurelianus
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > ************************************** See what's new at
> > http://www.aol.com
> > >
> > >
> > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> > >
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52235 From: PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@aol.com Date: 2007-11-08
Subject: Re: auspices
One of the advantages of being the gubenator of Am. Austrorientalis is that the Templum Neptuni has all the appropriate altars, the tempestes stones, mundus, oomphalos, and augural seat.  Apart from the thirty minute drive from Nashville to Lebanon, TN, it is convenient to have such a templum.  It took some hard work and a lot of information from Marcus Horatius to insure that all the procedures were carried out appropriately.



Fl. Galerius Aurelianus


-----Original Message-----
From: marcushoratius <mhoratius@...>
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thu, 8 Nov 2007 1:36 pm
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: auspices







Salva sis, cara Pompeia

There is only one known pair of eagles nesting in northern Ohio
today. They are in a park about 2o miles north from where I live. I
have seen them once, high above fittingly in the northeast quadrant,
that of Jupiter. I needed binoculars to make sure that they were
indeed eagles. That was very significant, considering that I was at
the time performing an auspicium.

Now in Minnesota you needed a broom to chase the eagles away; there
were so many along the banks of the Mississippi, even inside the Twin
cities. In that case, as with other birds that may be more common in
your area, you would have to be familiar with their habits. If you
took note of something unusual fron their normal habits, and
you "intuit," as Cicero said, that this was a sign, then it would
hold significance.

This really holds true for all signs. It is not just a
mechanical "taking of auspicia." There is rituals that comes into
play, sacrificing first at the altars for the Lares and then for the
celestial Gods as They arrive at dawn, then at each of the outlying
eight stations, then at the central seat of Silvanus. Performing all
of these rituals will place you into a ritual conscious where your
awareness is unlike your day to day consciousness and you must rely
on both your intuition and rationality. Only what you "feel" to be a
sign, heard or seen, is a sign. If an eagle came down and landed at
your feet and for some strange reason you did not think this anything
unsual as to be a sign, then it is not. OTOH the most common bird,
doing the most normal thing, even though not generally recognized
among the alites or oscines, could be taken as a sign. But then it
would be among the oblativa.

There are two categories of signs. Imperativa are those that you
designate beforehand as signs you will accept as a direct message
from the Gods. Thus after designating the boundaries of your
celestial templum you say, "I shall accept the eagle, the owl, the
woodpecker and all the traditional birds of aupiscia as my alites and
oscines, but I shall not accept the flight of a swan or the call of a
chickadee." There you have designated your imperativa. Oblativa are
signs that can arrive any time you offer sacrifice. They do not have
to be specified; they are not necessarily part of an auspicium. They
are not actually part of the auspicium proper, the signs you take,
but oblativa are used to confirm what has been been learned in an
auspicium. So oblativa have more to do with synchronicity, where an
ordinary event takes on a significant subjective meaning.

The classic tale used by Romans to explain oblativa was that of
Aemilius Paullus and his daughter.

"What of that which befell Consul L. Paullus, how memorable! It had
fallen to him by lot to conduct the war against king Perses.
Returning home from the Senate house, he noticed that his little
daughter called Tertia, a very small child (admodum parvula) at the
time, seemed sad when he gave her a kiss. To his question, why she
looked so sad, she answered that 'Persa perissa' (Persa had
perished). Now a puppy called Persa, the child's favorite, had
died. So Paullus seized upon the omen and from a chance saying
conceived a sure hope of a splendid triumph." ~ Valerius Maximus 1.5.3

There are three important factors in this story, repeated in another
version. First is the synchronicity of the even between what had
happened in the Senate and what the girl said; secondly the fact that
she was "a very small child at the time," because like birds small
children, innocent and pure, were considered very close to the Gods,
and then thirdly is the fact that Paullus himself took this as an
omen. He "seized it" (arripuit), or "quickly learned" from this,
instantly, that it was not mere chance that the lot had fallen to
him, but the Gods gave him a clear sign confirming that it was Their
will for him to lead the army against Perses.

Now then, there were different eagles used in Roman augury. Pliny
names six kinds of eagles, of which one is actually a vulture. Only
one though was the totem of Jupiter Optimus Maximus as the God of
sovereignty, and thus represented the highest auctoras. The eagle is
most significant since it is the bird of Jupiter. It takes
precedence over all other alites, which have precedence over
oscines. This is in part because it flies higher than all other
birds, thus it is closer to the Gods, and it circles, which takes
precedence over the straight flight of birds, and, although far
above, its call can be heard over that of all other birds, and thus
it is also considered among the oscines and takes precedence over all
the rest. Where it flies, in what direction and whether high or low,
or the direction it calls from, is what would determine the
significance of the presence of an eagle. The only signs that are
more significant than the appearance of an eagle would be certain
kinds of thunder and lightning. And no matter what such signs may be
thought to convey, they would have to be confirmed by other signs,
and then by oblativa in order to get a ful interpretation of the
auspicia.

Like Aurelianus said, and Hortensia, too, it's complicated to explain
everything and it takes some practice to get a feel for the art of
auspicia.

Vale et vade in Deos

M Moravius Piscinus

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "pompeia_minucia_tiberia"
<pompeia_minucia_tiberia@...> wrote:
>
> ---Salve Marce Moravi Piscine, Salvete Omnes:
>
> Curiosity, if I may:
>
> What about eagles? I would imagine favourable, but given their
> reverence by the Romans, and their less common sitings (they are so
> high flying and don't exactly nest in backyard trees :>)) would
their
> appearance in an augry have an extra special significance?
>
>
>
> Thanks in advance,
> Pompeia
>
>
> In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "marcushoratius" <mhoratius@> wrote:
> >
> > Salve
> >
> > I don't know about southern Ohio where Caeso Modianus lives, but
up
> > here in Northeast Ohio pigeons are all too common. I do not
> include
> > them as alites or oscines. Solitary birds always take precedence
> > over a flock of birds, which would generally rule out pigeons
> > anyway.
> >
> > You do have to take notice of the birds of your particular
> location.
> > I use the eastern blue jay among the oscines because of its
> behavior
> > and more so because its high pitched call is easily heard above
the
> > calls of other birds. I also have many of the traditional
oscines
> > and alites, if not quite the same species as you'd find in Europe.
> >
> > Nigidius mentioned that swans were used in auspicia privita,
> > eventhough they were not used in the auspicia publica. Swans are
> not
> > native here, but there are a few that have gone wild. It would
be
> a
> > rare day indeed for me to see any over my land, but they do live
on
> > nearby lakes, so it is not impossible, and thus I might consider
> such
> > a rare event.
> >
> > Vale optime
> > M Moravius Piscinus
> >
> >
> > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@ wrote:
> > >
> > > I recently had a conversation with Caeso Fabius Modianus about
> how
> > I am
> > > putting together augural guide with a new set of augural signs
> (ex
> > caelo,
> > > oscines, etc.) specific to the central and northern areas of
> > America
> > > Austrorientalis. He thought this was an excellent idea until I
> > mentioned that the first
> > > rule was that pigeons were to be ignored as either an
> affirmative
> > or negative
> > > sign due to their commonality in this part of the world. He
> said
> > that since
> > > they are uncommon in northern Ohio, he includes them in his
> > augural signs.
> > > Hey, what can you do. I'm sure that the first time a
provincial
> > magistrate took
> > > the auspices in Judea or Brittannia, he had to do some
> rethinking
> > if he was
> > > from Roma.
> > >
> > > Fl. Galerius Aurelianus
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > ************************************** See what's new at
> > http://www.aol.com
> > >
> > >
> > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> > >
> >
>





________________________________________________________________________
Email and AIM finally together. You've gotta check out free AOL Mail! - http://mail.aol.com


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52236 From: Caius Aemilius Crassus Date: 2007-11-08
Subject: Cista of Comitia Populi Tributa.
C. Aemilius Crassus omnibus SPD,

The two problems with the Cista of Comotia Populi
Tributa that I have reported are now corrected and I
would like to thank the person who did it (probably
the Magister Aranearius).

I have discovered another very small problem with the
cista, but this one without any impact on voting. When
we click the name of one candidate the window that
opens are of the election of MMDCCLIX (last year) and
not of MMDCCLX. In case of candidates that didnÂ’t run
for any post in last year it makes appear a page
without the statement, but in those cases where the
candidate also did run for an office last year it does
appear the last year statement.

Di vos incolumes custodiant.


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52237 From: Publius Memmius Albucius Date: 2007-11-08
Subject: Cista of Comitia Populi Tributa : INVALID ?
Memmius Consuli s.d.

Yes, Hon. M.A. Octavius has been very quick inserting the Aediles box!

Unhappily, I would however like to draw, solemnly, the attention of
Consul Galerius, presiding magistrate, on the fact that, after checking
this evening our "main list" (forum), I cannot find any declaration of
candidacy, in this main list, by Hon. Sextus Lucillius Tutor.

Apparently, the M.A. has not yet been informed of this absence.

So the cista seems not legal, and the whole CP Tributa could be
invalidated.

Am I wrong ?

If not, I suggest that you fix the situation asap in order to avoid
people voting unusefully : if the ballot is not legal, you will have to
re-organize it, on the same basis = a lot of time and energy wasted.

Vale,


P. Memmius Albucius



--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Caius Aemilius Crassus
<septemtrionis@...> wrote:
>
> C. Aemilius Crassus omnibus SPD,
>
> The two problems with the Cista of Comotia Populi
> Tributa that I have reported are now corrected and I
> would like to thank the person who did it (probably
> the Magister Aranearius).
(..)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52238 From: Patrick D. Owen Date: 2007-11-08
Subject: Articles: Originating Gentes of Rome & History of the Gens Galeria
I found this information on an Italian webpage and the Italian &
Portugese Wikipedia. There is some paraphrasing and compression in
this post. I will continue to review the three books I have by
Mommsen & the online works of Titus Livius to establish the
references and source material.

ORIGINATING GENTES

The origininal gentes were archaic family clans that would have
existed at the time of the birth of Rome.

According to the historian Titus Livius, at the time of the founding
of Rome, there would have been a group of existing clans that formed
a federation or allian under the unifying action of Romulus. Many
families came to follow Titus Tatius of the Sabini and merged with
the Romans. According to Titus Livius (Livy), there were originally
one hundred families or clans distributed in three ancient tribal
groups:

Ramnes - which should be indentified at the native Roman families,
led by Romulus and Remus and allocated to the lowlands & river
crossings;
Tities - families that came to follow Titus Tatius of the Sabines;
Luceres - which according to some scholars were residents of the
forested areas on the outskirts of Rome (from Latin 'lucus'
or 'forest'); mainly indigenous ethnic tribes and other nations
originally introduced by an Etruscan Lucumone ('king') from whom the
tribal name was derived.
According to this interpretation, the proto-community of Rome formed
with the mergin of three peoples: Latins, Sabini, and Etruscans.

Romulus would have organized the first assembly meeting of the heads
or fathers (patres, hence the origin of the patricians) fo these
hundred families; giving rise to the Senate or advisory body of the
king.

A complete list of these one hundred Gentes can be extrapolated from
later Republican writings and epigraphy, as well as archaeological
and historical works of modern times. Some of these Roman families
are very famous, others are less well known; especially thos that
became extinct soon after the founding of Rome.

As part of the original one hundred Gentes, Theodor Mommsen had a
separate group of ancient gentes whose names are derived from the
ancient tribes territories around Rome. Among these ancient gentes
that survived into the later centuries, Mommsen listed the following:

Aemilia, Cornelia, Fabia, Horatia, Menenia, Papiria, Romilia (the
gentes of Romulus), Sergia, and Veturia (or Voturia)

Among the Gentes that became extinct early, Mommsen listed the
following:

Camilia, Galeria, Lemonia, Pollia, Pupinia, and Voltinia.

Also under the original Gentes are families mentioned by Livy to
explain the origins of Lacus Curtius:

Curtia - an ancient Sabini gentes, which produced the hero Mettius
Curtius;
Hostilia - a gentes of Oscan or Ostian origin that produced the
Roman king, Tullius Hostilius.

Other ancient gentes of Sabine, Latin, or other origin are:

Pompilia - the gentes of Numa Pompilius, the second king of Rome;
Marcia;
Valeria;
Iulia (the gentes of C. Iulius Caesar);
Claudia - a gentes that is listed among the ancient hundred families
but which archaeologists and historians now believe originated from
the area of the Aniene & settled in Roman territory in the fifth
century BC.

THE GENS GALERIA

The Gens Galeria was an ancient patrician family, already existing
at the time of Romulus and one of the one hundred original gentes
listed by the Roman historian Titus Livius (Livy). According to the
distinguished scholar Theodor Mommsen, the antiquity of this family
can be deduced from the fact that it gave its name to one of the
ancient Rural tribes of Rome and later one of the original 16
voting Tribes and/or districts.

The origin of the gens Galeria was probably Sabine, apparently due
to a family group that originated in the are of the Rio Galera,
which flowed eas of Lake Bracciano.

Because during the historical period the Gens Galeria was classed
only as a Plebeian Tribe, Mommsen believes that the original
Patrician family had been extinguished early in the Regal Period.
However, in 495 B.C., the tribe gave its name to one of the first 16
Rural Tribes.

It should be noted that the gens Galeria expanded hand in hand with
the territorial growth of Rome and the extension of Roman
citizenship. First to the Etruscan areas, then the Italic peoples
of the central penisula to be followed by areas around Abella,
Abellino, Vibino, Compsa; also northern territories near Luna,
Genoa, Pisa, and Velleia. By the late Republic and early empire,
the gens Galeria can be identified in Cisalpine Gaul, Africa,
Betica, Tarraonensis, Lusitania (western Hispania), and Gaul
Lugdunesis.

Fl. Galerius Aurelianus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52239 From: pompeia_minucia_tiberia Date: 2007-11-08
Subject: Re: Cista of Comitia Populi Tributa : INVALID ?
---Salvete T. Galerius Paulinus Consul et P. Memmius Albucius Legatus
pro Praetore:

For what it's worth, I was surprised to read just now of the
candidacy of Sex. Lucius Tutor for Curule Aedile....as I don't recall
a mention from him of his intention to run.

I've gone through and checked to see if I initially missed
something....and I've checked both the main forum and the announce
forum (the use of the latter seemingly being deemed ok in uncontested
magistracies) and I find nothing on either list, not a word from
Tutor.

I've been working all day and I haven't entered the cista yet, but
I'm surprised he is represented on the ballot as a candidate, not
having heard a thing from him in this regard.

Valete
Pompeia Minucia Strabo
Custos


In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Publius Memmius Albucius"
<albucius_aoe@...> wrote:
>
> Memmius Consuli s.d.
>
> Yes, Hon. M.A. Octavius has been very quick inserting the Aediles
box!
>
> Unhappily, I would however like to draw, solemnly, the attention of
> Consul Galerius, presiding magistrate, on the fact that, after
checking
> this evening our "main list" (forum), I cannot find any declaration
of
> candidacy, in this main list, by Hon. Sextus Lucillius Tutor.
>
> Apparently, the M.A. has not yet been informed of this absence.
>
> So the cista seems not legal, and the whole CP Tributa could be
> invalidated.
>
> Am I wrong ?
>
> If not, I suggest that you fix the situation asap in order to avoid
> people voting unusefully : if the ballot is not legal, you will
have to
> re-organize it, on the same basis = a lot of time and energy wasted.
>
> Vale,
>
>
> P. Memmius Albucius
>
>
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Caius Aemilius Crassus
> <septemtrionis@> wrote:
> >
> > C. Aemilius Crassus omnibus SPD,
> >
> > The two problems with the Cista of Comotia Populi
> > Tributa that I have reported are now corrected and I
> > would like to thank the person who did it (probably
> > the Magister Aranearius).
> (..)
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52240 From: liviacases Date: 2007-11-08
Subject: Re: praeturae petitio alius
L. Livia Plauta omnibus S.P.D.

some years ago I read a book on this topic, or rather on the reasons
why Romans didn't adopt the greek love for science. It's "La
rivoluzione dimenticata" by Lucio Russo, published by Feltrinelli in
1996. I don't know if it's translated into English, but an Amazon
search should yeald an answer.

The author examines a lot of archeological evidence (like the
Antikythera mechanism) and literary sources to determine that ancient
greek science was far more advanced than had been supposed, but
Romans were only interested in practical applications, and not in the
theory behind them, so most of the books that survived the centuries
are actually "popular science" that doesn't give the details of the
various sciences. The detailed books were in Greek, and none survived
the centuries of christianity.

Of course Romans were practical minded, and it made much more
economical sense in the circumstances to use cheap slave labour than
machines (though putting it this way is oversimplifying, because
Romans did use at least as many machines as Europe in the 18th
century).

I'm not sure we would be coming from the stars, though, if Romans had
started the industrial revolution: maybe we would just have caused an
ecological catastrophe many centuries ago.

Valete.



--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Sebastian José Molina Palacios
<sebastian_andaluz@...> wrote:
>
> I think it´s right what you say, but, anyway, there´s something the
ancient Romans didn´t adopt: the love for sciences and scientific
advances. Ancient Greeks got great achievements in maths, medicine,
physics, astronomy, etc. and what to say about the Library of
Alexandria. Romans were good in engineering and not much more. what
had happened if Romans had begun the industrial revolution? But, in
this case, tradition was more powerful for them and they prefered to
go on with slavery than use machines.
> Many years ago, when i was at the High School, a teacher of
Phisycs told us: "if Romans had begun the industrial revolution, now
we would be coming from stars". I don´t know if that is very
exaggerated, but it made me think and dream.
>
> Quintus Livius Drusus.
>
> "A. Tullia Scholastica" <fororom@...> escribió:
> >
> > A. Tullia Scholastica Flavio Galerio Aureliano quiritibus bonae
voluntatis
> > S.P.D.
> >
> >
> > The Romans loved innovation. They adopted the gods, weapons, farm
> > implements, theatre, divine images, foods, wines, beers, meads,
ships,
> > drinking cups,
> > dinner services, dining couches, ad infinitum from their friends,
allies, and
> > enemies.
> >
> > ATS: Add to that their clothing, since the toga itself seems to
have been
> > borrowed from Etruria, along with those haruspices. However,
social
> > innovation did not seem to be one of their very favorite things.
> >
> > The Romans were one of the most adoptive and adaptive people in
> > the ancient world. All the Romans wanted was Peace, a Roman Peace
along with
> > a
> > little piece of Gaul, a little piece of Germania, most of
Britannia, all of
> > Ptolemic Aegypt, all of Seleucid Persia, Thrace, Greece,
Macedonia . . . the
> > list goes on and on.
> >
> > ATS: Indeed, the Romans were a very pieceful people. A little
piece o¹
> > this, a big piece o¹ that...now why can¹t we get some pieces that
are better
> > than $200 of Texan pasture land (if it can be used as pasture
land...if so,
> > why not rent it out?).
> >
> >
> > I love being a Nova Roman.
> >
> > ATS: Lots of us do.
> >
> >
> > Fl. Galerius Aurelianus
> >
> > Vale, et valete.
> >
> >
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52241 From: Stephen Gallagher Date: 2007-11-08
Subject: Sextus Lucillius Tutor name is removed from the ballot.
Salvete Nova Romans

I have asked that Sextus Lucillius Tutor name be removed from the ballot.
I ask the Diribitores not to count any votes cast for him up to now
If he still wants to stand forelection he can do so in the next round.

Valete

Tiberius Galerius Paulinus
Consul
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52242 From: pompeia_minucia_tiberia Date: 2007-11-08
Subject: Re: auspices
---Salve Marce Moravi Piscine, Salvete Omnes:

Truly an informative reply, Piscine. I, and I'm sure others do as
well, appreciate your taking the time to post this.

Valete
Pompeia


In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "marcushoratius" <mhoratius@...> wrote:
>
> Salva sis, cara Pompeia
>
> There is only one known pair of eagles nesting in northern Ohio
> today. They are in a park about 2o miles north from where I live.
I
> have seen them once, high above fittingly in the northeast
quadrant,
> that of Jupiter. I needed binoculars to make sure that they were
> indeed eagles. That was very significant, considering that I was
at
> the time performing an auspicium.
>
> Now in Minnesota you needed a broom to chase the eagles away; there
> were so many along the banks of the Mississippi, even inside the
Twin
> cities. In that case, as with other birds that may be more common
in
> your area, you would have to be familiar with their habits. If you
> took note of something unusual fron their normal habits, and
> you "intuit," as Cicero said, that this was a sign, then it would
> hold significance.
>
> This really holds true for all signs. It is not just a
> mechanical "taking of auspicia." There is rituals that comes into
> play, sacrificing first at the altars for the Lares and then for
the
> celestial Gods as They arrive at dawn, then at each of the outlying
> eight stations, then at the central seat of Silvanus. Performing
all
> of these rituals will place you into a ritual conscious where your
> awareness is unlike your day to day consciousness and you must rely
> on both your intuition and rationality. Only what you "feel" to be
a
> sign, heard or seen, is a sign. If an eagle came down and landed
at
> your feet and for some strange reason you did not think this
anything
> unsual as to be a sign, then it is not. OTOH the most common bird,
> doing the most normal thing, even though not generally recognized
> among the alites or oscines, could be taken as a sign. But then it
> would be among the oblativa.
>
> There are two categories of signs. Imperativa are those that you
> designate beforehand as signs you will accept as a direct message
> from the Gods. Thus after designating the boundaries of your
> celestial templum you say, "I shall accept the eagle, the owl, the
> woodpecker and all the traditional birds of aupiscia as my alites
and
> oscines, but I shall not accept the flight of a swan or the call of
a
> chickadee." There you have designated your imperativa. Oblativa
are
> signs that can arrive any time you offer sacrifice. They do not
have
> to be specified; they are not necessarily part of an auspicium.
They
> are not actually part of the auspicium proper, the signs you take,
> but oblativa are used to confirm what has been been learned in an
> auspicium. So oblativa have more to do with synchronicity, where
an
> ordinary event takes on a significant subjective meaning.
>
> The classic tale used by Romans to explain oblativa was that of
> Aemilius Paullus and his daughter.
>
> "What of that which befell Consul L. Paullus, how memorable! It
had
> fallen to him by lot to conduct the war against king Perses.
> Returning home from the Senate house, he noticed that his little
> daughter called Tertia, a very small child (admodum parvula) at the
> time, seemed sad when he gave her a kiss. To his question, why she
> looked so sad, she answered that 'Persa perissa' (Persa had
> perished). Now a puppy called Persa, the child's favorite, had
> died. So Paullus seized upon the omen and from a chance saying
> conceived a sure hope of a splendid triumph." ~ Valerius Maximus
1.5.3
>
> There are three important factors in this story, repeated in
another
> version. First is the synchronicity of the even between what had
> happened in the Senate and what the girl said; secondly the fact
that
> she was "a very small child at the time," because like birds small
> children, innocent and pure, were considered very close to the
Gods,
> and then thirdly is the fact that Paullus himself took this as an
> omen. He "seized it" (arripuit), or "quickly learned" from this,
> instantly, that it was not mere chance that the lot had fallen to
> him, but the Gods gave him a clear sign confirming that it was
Their
> will for him to lead the army against Perses.
>
> Now then, there were different eagles used in Roman augury. Pliny
> names six kinds of eagles, of which one is actually a vulture.
Only
> one though was the totem of Jupiter Optimus Maximus as the God of
> sovereignty, and thus represented the highest auctoras. The eagle
is
> most significant since it is the bird of Jupiter. It takes
> precedence over all other alites, which have precedence over
> oscines. This is in part because it flies higher than all other
> birds, thus it is closer to the Gods, and it circles, which takes
> precedence over the straight flight of birds, and, although far
> above, its call can be heard over that of all other birds, and thus
> it is also considered among the oscines and takes precedence over
all
> the rest. Where it flies, in what direction and whether high or
low,
> or the direction it calls from, is what would determine the
> significance of the presence of an eagle. The only signs that are
> more significant than the appearance of an eagle would be certain
> kinds of thunder and lightning. And no matter what such signs may
be
> thought to convey, they would have to be confirmed by other signs,
> and then by oblativa in order to get a ful interpretation of the
> auspicia.
>
> Like Aurelianus said, and Hortensia, too, it's complicated to
explain
> everything and it takes some practice to get a feel for the art of
> auspicia.
>
> Vale et vade in Deos
>
> M Moravius Piscinus
>
>
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "pompeia_minucia_tiberia"
> <pompeia_minucia_tiberia@> wrote:
> >
> > ---Salve Marce Moravi Piscine, Salvete Omnes:
> >
> > Curiosity, if I may:
> >
> > What about eagles? I would imagine favourable, but given their
> > reverence by the Romans, and their less common sitings (they are
so
> > high flying and don't exactly nest in backyard trees :>)) would
> their
> > appearance in an augry have an extra special significance?
> >
> >
> >
> > Thanks in advance,
> > Pompeia
> >
> >
> > In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "marcushoratius" <mhoratius@>
wrote:
> > >
> > > Salve
> > >
> > > I don't know about southern Ohio where Caeso Modianus lives,
but
> up
> > > here in Northeast Ohio pigeons are all too common. I do not
> > include
> > > them as alites or oscines. Solitary birds always take
precedence
> > > over a flock of birds, which would generally rule out pigeons
> > > anyway.
> > >
> > > You do have to take notice of the birds of your particular
> > location.
> > > I use the eastern blue jay among the oscines because of its
> > behavior
> > > and more so because its high pitched call is easily heard above
> the
> > > calls of other birds. I also have many of the traditional
> oscines
> > > and alites, if not quite the same species as you'd find in
Europe.
> > >
> > > Nigidius mentioned that swans were used in auspicia privita,
> > > eventhough they were not used in the auspicia publica. Swans
are
> > not
> > > native here, but there are a few that have gone wild. It would
> be
> > a
> > > rare day indeed for me to see any over my land, but they do
live
> on
> > > nearby lakes, so it is not impossible, and thus I might
consider
> > such
> > > a rare event.
> > >
> > > Vale optime
> > > M Moravius Piscinus
> > >
> > >
> > > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@ wrote:
> > > >
> > > > I recently had a conversation with Caeso Fabius Modianus
about
> > how
> > > I am
> > > > putting together augural guide with a new set of augural
signs
> > (ex
> > > caelo,
> > > > oscines, etc.) specific to the central and northern areas of
> > > America
> > > > Austrorientalis. He thought this was an excellent idea until
I
> > > mentioned that the first
> > > > rule was that pigeons were to be ignored as either an
> > affirmative
> > > or negative
> > > > sign due to their commonality in this part of the world. He
> > said
> > > that since
> > > > they are uncommon in northern Ohio, he includes them in his
> > > augural signs.
> > > > Hey, what can you do. I'm sure that the first time a
> provincial
> > > magistrate took
> > > > the auspices in Judea or Brittannia, he had to do some
> > rethinking
> > > if he was
> > > > from Roma.
> > > >
> > > > Fl. Galerius Aurelianus
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > ************************************** See what's new at
> > > http://www.aol.com
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52243 From: marcushoratius Date: 2007-11-08
Subject: a. d. V Eidus Novembris
M. Moravius Piscinus Horatianus Quiritibus et omnibus salutem
plurimam dicit: Diis bene iuvantibus simus.

Hodie est ante diem V Eidus Novembris; haec dies comitialis est:
Divae Helenae supplicatio ex quis muneribus nosse contigit Deos.

Helena, the daughter of Constantine and Fausta, sister of Constantius
II, and wife of Julian the Blessed died in Gaul during the ludi
Quinquennialis, probably while in childbirth, possibly in 360 CE, the
same year that Julian was proclaimed emperor by his troops. She was
buried at a villa on the Via Nomentana in Rome. A supplicatio, or
thanksgiving, was offered to her by Roman legions as a Mater Castrae
and later for the apotheosis of her juno, with this date being the
dies natalis into her new life as a divine being.


Today's thought comes from Musonius Rufus on the Chief End of Marriage

"The husband and wife, he [Musonius] used to say, should come
together for the purpose of making a life in common and of
procreating children, and furthermore of regarding all things in
common between them, and nothing peculiar or private to one or the
other, not even their own bodies. The birth of a human being which
results from such a union is to be sure something marvelous, but it
is not yet enough for the relation of husband and wife, inasmuch as
quite apart from marriage it could result from any other sexual
union, just as in the case of animals. But in marriage there must be
above all perfect companionship and mutual love of husband and wife,
both in health and in sickness and under all conditions, since it was
with desire for this as well as for having children that both entered
upon marriage. Where, then, this love for each other is perfect and
the two share it completely, each striving to outdo the other in
devotion, the marriage is ideal and worthy of envy, for such a union
is beautiful. But where each looks only to his own interests and
neglects the other, or, what is worse, when one is so minded and
lives in the same house but fixes his attention elsewhere and is not
willing to pull together with his yoke-mate nor to agree, then the
union is doomed to disaster and though they live together, yet their
common interests fare badly; eventually they separate entirely or
they remain together and suffer what is worse than loneliness." ~
Musonius, Discourse XIIIA,
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52244 From: marcushoratius Date: 2007-11-08
Subject: Re: auspices
Salva sis, Pompeia

Voluptas erat mea. The subject of Roman augury is a special interest
of mine. There is always more to learn on the subject, and for me
writing has always been a way to collect my thoughts and learn more.
Or as it is said, Qui scribit, bis dicit.

Vale optime
M Moravius Piscinus




--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "pompeia_minucia_tiberia"
<pompeia_minucia_tiberia@...> wrote:
>
> ---Salve Marce Moravi Piscine, Salvete Omnes:
>
> Truly an informative reply, Piscine. I, and I'm sure others do as
> well, appreciate your taking the time to post this.
>
> Valete
> Pompeia
>
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52245 From: Publius Memmius Albucius Date: 2007-11-09
Subject: URGENT : Question to DIRIBITORES and CUSTODES
P. Memmius Albucius Dibitoribus et Custodibus s.d.

Consul Galerius has now fixed the question of the absence of
registration of Hon. Sextus Lucillius Tutor for curule aedilitas.

He asked you, Hon. Diribitores, "not to count any votes cast for him
up to now".

This is a first point, but there is another practical question: when
a civis has cast her/his votes in a page which *did not yet* contain
the "aediles" box.

What do you, Diribitores, and you Custodes, ask us to do in such a
case :
- send a second complementary vote, only concerning the aedile item,
not touching anymore the other lines ;
*OR*
- considering the first vote as void, re-send you a cast for the
whole page ?

Thanks to all!


Valete,


P. Memmius Albucius


--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Stephen Gallagher" <spqr753@...>
wrote:
>
> Salvete Nova Romans
>
> I have asked that Sextus Lucillius Tutor name be removed from the
ballot.
> I ask the Diribitores not to count any votes cast for him up to now
> If he still wants to stand forelection he can do so in the next
round.
>
> Valete
>
> Tiberius Galerius Paulinus
> Consul
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52246 From: Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus Date: 2007-11-09
Subject: Re: De rogatoribus - Proposed Law
Cn. Lentulus Cn. Marino suo sal.


>>>>>>>>"1) As far as I know, rogatores, diribitores and custodes weren't
> elected magistrates in ancient Rome either."

I'm happy to have a scholarly discussion with you about this, but do
please provide some scholarly evidence. What are your sources for
this information? The little bit that Smith has to say about the
rogatores, diribitores, and custodes is this: <<<<<<<<<<<<



According to Pliny The Elder (Naturales Historiae XXXIII 29-31):

"Decuriae quoque ipsae pluribus discretae nominibus fuere, tribunorum aeris et selectorum et iudicum. praeter hos etiamnum nongenti vocabantur ex omnibus selecti ad custodiendas suffragiorum cistas in comitiis."

I this he says that the equites were divided into three decuriae: tribuni aerarii, selecti and iudices. In addition to that there were a fourth, selected from all the others: the custodes with 900 members.

In my view, that implies that the 900 custodes weren't elected.
If that was the method of appointing custodes, probably the rogatoresand diribitores were designed in a similar way.

I read in the internet:
http://www.vroma.org:7878/5087/

if it's true, then the diribitores also were 900. That wayI would be sure that the rogatores, too. Well, this source doesn't provide us with its own sources.

The nature of these offices, I think, suggests us that the rogator, diribitor, custos are not an elected office (too large number, too insignificant task) for a Roman politician).


Cura ut valeas!


---------------------------------

---------------------------------
L'email della prossima generazione? Puoi averla con la nuova Yahoo! Mail

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52247 From: pompeia_minucia_tiberia Date: 2007-11-09
Subject: Re: URGENT : Question to DIRIBITORES and CUSTODES
---Salve P. Memmius Albucius, Salvete Omnes:

My reponse below:

In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Publius Memmius Albucius"
<albucius_aoe@...> wrote:
>
> P. Memmius Albucius Dibitoribus et Custodibus s.d.
>
> Consul Galerius has now fixed the question of the absence of
> registration of Hon. Sextus Lucillius Tutor for curule aedilitas.
>
> He asked you, Hon. Diribitores, "not to count any votes cast for
him
> up to now".
>
> This is a first point, but there is another practical question:
when
> a civis has cast her/his votes in a page which *did not yet*
contain
> the "aediles" box.
>
> What do you, Diribitores, and you Custodes, ask us to do in such a
> case :
> - send a second complementary vote, only concerning the aedile
item,
> not touching anymore the other lines ;
> *OR*
> - considering the first vote as void, re-send you a cast for the
> whole page ?


Pompeia: I believe the most practical solution, and the one most in
line with the law on these procedures is to have those who weren't
able to cast a ballot for a Curule Aedile to recast their ballot with
*ONLY* the Aedile selection marked. This way we would know it is a
vote supplementary to their initial ballot, not an arbitrary attempt
at a duplicate vote, which happens. I don't see how we would be able
to distinguish the above if voters recast their ballots in entirety.

Technically, the law says that we are to honour only the first ballot
cast by a particular voter, that any resubmissions are void. This
said, I recommend the following:

The Consul issue an edict permitting a recast of tribal votes for
Curule Aedile 'only'..for those who did not have the option of voting
for an aedile when they voted...by his imperium as presiding
magistrate/consul, validating that these votes are in fact
*supplementary* to the original votes cast, and may be regarded as
valid by the Diribitores and Custodes.

I think the Custodes and Diribitores, although we have the potestas
to issue edicts, have to remain within the law, and any modifications
of the process and the rationale for this, are best left to the
imperium-bearing Consul/presiding magistrate.

I hope this helps

Po Minucia
Custos
>
> Thanks to all!
>
>
> Valete,
>
>
> P. Memmius Albucius
>
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Stephen Gallagher" <spqr753@>
> wrote:
> >
> > Salvete Nova Romans
> >
> > I have asked that Sextus Lucillius Tutor name be removed from
the
> ballot.
> > I ask the Diribitores not to count any votes cast for him up to
now
> > If he still wants to stand forelection he can do so in the next
> round.
> >
> > Valete
> >
> > Tiberius Galerius Paulinus
> > Consul
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52248 From: Publius Memmius Albucius Date: 2007-11-09
Subject: Re: URGENT : Question to DIRIBITORES and CUSTODES
Memmius Minuciae s.d.

Thanks a lot for your advice, that I have just followed personally.

But you see, nothing is perfect because the ballot includes at the
same time the vote for magistrates and for laws. And the problem is
the vote is automatically selected, for the leges, on "abstineo". So
you have at least, if your vote is not "abstineo" on every law, to
fill, in addition, these parts of the cista. :-(

Vale Pompeia,


P. Memmius Albucius




--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "pompeia_minucia_tiberia"
<pompeia_minucia_tiberia@...> wrote:
>
> ---Salve P. Memmius Albucius, Salvete Omnes:
>
> My reponse below:
>
> In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Publius Memmius Albucius"
> <albucius_aoe@> wrote:
> >
> > P. Memmius Albucius Dibitoribus et Custodibus s.d.
> >
> > Consul Galerius has now fixed the question of the absence of
> > registration of Hon. Sextus Lucillius Tutor for curule aedilitas.
> >
> > He asked you, Hon. Diribitores, "not to count any votes cast for
> him
> > up to now".
> >
> > This is a first point, but there is another practical question:
> when
> > a civis has cast her/his votes in a page which *did not yet*
> contain
> > the "aediles" box.
> >
> > What do you, Diribitores, and you Custodes, ask us to do in such
a
> > case :
> > - send a second complementary vote, only concerning the aedile
> item,
> > not touching anymore the other lines ;
> > *OR*
> > - considering the first vote as void, re-send you a cast for the
> > whole page ?
>
>
> Pompeia: I believe the most practical solution, and the one most
in
> line with the law on these procedures is to have those who weren't
> able to cast a ballot for a Curule Aedile to recast their ballot
with
> *ONLY* the Aedile selection marked. This way we would know it is a
> vote supplementary to their initial ballot, not an arbitrary
attempt
> at a duplicate vote, which happens. I don't see how we would be
able
> to distinguish the above if voters recast their ballots in entirety.
>
> Technically, the law says that we are to honour only the first
ballot
> cast by a particular voter, that any resubmissions are void. This
> said, I recommend the following:
>
> The Consul issue an edict permitting a recast of tribal votes for
> Curule Aedile 'only'..for those who did not have the option of
voting
> for an aedile when they voted...by his imperium as presiding
> magistrate/consul, validating that these votes are in fact
> *supplementary* to the original votes cast, and may be regarded as
> valid by the Diribitores and Custodes.
>
> I think the Custodes and Diribitores, although we have the potestas
> to issue edicts, have to remain within the law, and any
modifications
> of the process and the rationale for this, are best left to the
> imperium-bearing Consul/presiding magistrate.
>
> I hope this helps
>
> Po Minucia
> Custos
> >
> > Thanks to all!
> >
> >
> > Valete,
> >
> >
> > P. Memmius Albucius
> >
> >
> > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Stephen Gallagher" <spqr753@>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Salvete Nova Romans
> > >
> > > I have asked that Sextus Lucillius Tutor name be removed from
> the
> > ballot.
> > > I ask the Diribitores not to count any votes cast for him up to
> now
> > > If he still wants to stand forelection he can do so in the
next
> > round.
> > >
> > > Valete
> > >
> > > Tiberius Galerius Paulinus
> > > Consul
> > >
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52249 From: GAIVS IVLIANVS Date: 2007-11-09
Subject: Needing a Toga made!
Salvete Romani! Salvete Omnes! Can anyone please tell
me where I may obtain a traditional Roman Toga made
out of lightweight wool to fit me?! After years of
wear the one I had which was made for me by the late
Salvatore Ruta in Messina, Italia is worn to the point
of not being able to wear anymore! I will pay whoever
is good at making Togas to have one made for me!
Gratias vobis ago! Valete! Gaivs Ivlivs Ivlianvs

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52250 From: pompeia_minucia_tiberia Date: 2007-11-09
Subject: Re: URGENT : Question to DIRIBITORES and CUSTODES
---Minucia Memmio sal


So, if I understand you correctly, you have gone into the cista and
revoted only for Curule Aedile, and all the other items on the ballot
showed up as 'abstenio', although you left them blank?

If this is so, then your initial vote at the cista for the other
items/candidates would be the one that counts, and your entry for
aedile could still be considered a valid supplementary vote. Your
vote would be crosschecked anyway to see if it's a duplicate entry.
If it *is* in fact a duplicate vote, and you have voted this second
time only for an Aedile only, despite the rest showing up as
abstain....I think we could still distinguish these supplementary
votes, and hold them as valid.

But I await the counsel of our Consul and presiding magistrate.

Valete
Po Minucia

In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Publius Memmius Albucius"
<albucius_aoe@...> wrote:
>
> Memmius Minuciae s.d.
>
> Thanks a lot for your advice, that I have just followed personally.
>
> But you see, nothing is perfect because the ballot includes at the
> same time the vote for magistrates and for laws. And the problem is
> the vote is automatically selected, for the leges, on "abstineo".
So
> you have at least, if your vote is not "abstineo" on every law, to
> fill, in addition, these parts of the cista. :-(
>
> Vale Pompeia,
>
>
> P. Memmius Albucius
>
>
>
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "pompeia_minucia_tiberia"
> <pompeia_minucia_tiberia@> wrote:
> >
> > ---Salve P. Memmius Albucius, Salvete Omnes:
> >
> > My reponse below:
> >
> > In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Publius Memmius Albucius"
> > <albucius_aoe@> wrote:
> > >
> > > P. Memmius Albucius Dibitoribus et Custodibus s.d.
> > >
> > > Consul Galerius has now fixed the question of the absence of
> > > registration of Hon. Sextus Lucillius Tutor for curule
aedilitas.
> > >
> > > He asked you, Hon. Diribitores, "not to count any votes cast
for
> > him
> > > up to now".
> > >
> > > This is a first point, but there is another practical question:
> > when
> > > a civis has cast her/his votes in a page which *did not yet*
> > contain
> > > the "aediles" box.
> > >
> > > What do you, Diribitores, and you Custodes, ask us to do in
such
> a
> > > case :
> > > - send a second complementary vote, only concerning the aedile
> > item,
> > > not touching anymore the other lines ;
> > > *OR*
> > > - considering the first vote as void, re-send you a cast for
the
> > > whole page ?
> >
> >
> > Pompeia: I believe the most practical solution, and the one most
> in
> > line with the law on these procedures is to have those who
weren't
> > able to cast a ballot for a Curule Aedile to recast their ballot
> with
> > *ONLY* the Aedile selection marked. This way we would know it is
a
> > vote supplementary to their initial ballot, not an arbitrary
> attempt
> > at a duplicate vote, which happens. I don't see how we would be
> able
> > to distinguish the above if voters recast their ballots in
entirety.
> >
> > Technically, the law says that we are to honour only the first
> ballot
> > cast by a particular voter, that any resubmissions are void. This
> > said, I recommend the following:
> >
> > The Consul issue an edict permitting a recast of tribal votes for
> > Curule Aedile 'only'..for those who did not have the option of
> voting
> > for an aedile when they voted...by his imperium as presiding
> > magistrate/consul, validating that these votes are in fact
> > *supplementary* to the original votes cast, and may be regarded
as
> > valid by the Diribitores and Custodes.
> >
> > I think the Custodes and Diribitores, although we have the
potestas
> > to issue edicts, have to remain within the law, and any
> modifications
> > of the process and the rationale for this, are best left to the
> > imperium-bearing Consul/presiding magistrate.
> >
> > I hope this helps
> >
> > Po Minucia
> > Custos
> > >
> > > Thanks to all!
> > >
> > >
> > > Valete,
> > >
> > >
> > > P. Memmius Albucius
> > >
> > >
> > > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Stephen Gallagher"
<spqr753@>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Salvete Nova Romans
> > > >
> > > > I have asked that Sextus Lucillius Tutor name be removed
from
> > the
> > > ballot.
> > > > I ask the Diribitores not to count any votes cast for him up
to
> > now
> > > > If he still wants to stand forelection he can do so in the
> next
> > > round.
> > > >
> > > > Valete
> > > >
> > > > Tiberius Galerius Paulinus
> > > > Consul
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52251 From: pompeia_minucia_tiberia Date: 2007-11-09
Subject: Re: Needing a Toga made!
---

Salve Gai Iuli

http://www.lawrensnest.com/

They do alot of Roman garb, helmets, etc.

They are out of New England. Alot of reenactors patronize them.

Vale
Pompeia




In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, GAIVS IVLIANVS <ivlianvs309@...> wrote:
>
> Salvete Romani! Salvete Omnes! Can anyone please tell
> me where I may obtain a traditional Roman Toga made
> out of lightweight wool to fit me?! After years of
> wear the one I had which was made for me by the late
> Salvatore Ruta in Messina, Italia is worn to the point
> of not being able to wear anymore! I will pay whoever
> is good at making Togas to have one made for me!
> Gratias vobis ago! Valete! Gaivs Ivlivs Ivlianvs
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> http://mail.yahoo.com
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52252 From: Pompeia Minucia Strabo Date: 2007-11-09
Subject: Custos Announcement - Century Praerogativa Privilege Expired
Po Minucia Strabo Custos Quiritibus Novae Romae S.P.D.


I am taking the liberty of making this announcement in accordance with the Consular Edict of T. Galerius Paulinus issued Nov. 1, regarding the voting schedule of the Comitia Centuriata (Pasted below).

It is now a couple of minutes past Roman time 6pm Nov. 9 and the vote-first privilege of the Century Praerogativa, which is Century II, is now expired.

This doesn't mean that members of this century can't vote at a later time...simply, they won't be counted up front in the Century Praerogativa projections.

Voting for First Class,according to the Consul's edict, commences Nov. 10 (tomorrow) 6 pm Roman Time.

I would encourage you to vote according to the schedule to keep your vote in good standing.

Valete omnes.....





Ex offico Tiberius Galerius Paulinus

Censor and Augur Gaius Fabius Buteo Modianus has taken the auspices and the
augury was favorable. The Comitia Centuriata is convened to vote for the
ordinary Centuriate magistracies for calendar year 2761 auc.

The Contio will begin at 6:00 PM, Roma time (Central European Time), on 3
November and will last until 5:59 PM, Roma time, on 8 November . Voting
will then commence according to this schedule:

During the Contio the diribitores need to select and announce the Centuria
Praerogativa.

6:00 PM, 08 November: Voting by the Centuria Praerogativa *only* begins.
6:00 PM, 09 November: Diribitores capture tally of Centuria Praerogativa.
6:00 PM, 10 November: Voting by all First Class centuries now permitted.
6:00 PM, 11 November: Diribitores capture tally of all First Class
centuries.
6:00 PM, 12 November: Voting by all centuries now permitted.
6:00 PM, 13 November: Voting ends.

The diribitores shall provide reports of the progress of the voting in
accordance with the provisions of the LEX FABIA DE RATIONE COMITIORUM
CENTURIATORUM.


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52253 From: C. Curius Saturninus Date: 2007-11-09
Subject: LUDI PLEBEII LITERARY CONTEST
Salvete omnes,

It's my pleasure to present you the winner of the Ludi Plebeii
Literary Contest!

It is a work by L. Vitellius Triarius, named Rupes Tarpeia!

You can read it from:
http://www.novaroma.org/nr/LudiPlebeii_Literary_Contest_Winner

Valete,

C. Curius Saturninus
(Mikko Sillanpää)

Senator - Aedilis Plebis - Propraetor Provinciae Thules
Rector Academia Thules ad Studia Romana Antiqua et Nova

e-mail: c.curius@...
www.academiathules.org
thule.novaroma.org




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52254 From: Marcus Iulius Severus Date: 2007-11-09
Subject: FIRST CLASS CENTURIES?
Salvete,

Would somebody be so kind as to illustrate me about which are the first class centuries? I confess that I am lost at this point...

Valete,


M•IVL•SEVERVS
LEGATVS•PRO•PRÆTORE•PROVINCIƕMEXICO
VIAT•TR•PL•M•C•C
SCRIBA•CENSORIS•G•F•B•M
INTERPRETER
MVSÆVS•COLLEGII•ERATOVS•SODALITATIS•MVSARVM
SOCIVS•CHORI•MVSARVM
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52255 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2007-11-09
Subject: Re: FIRST CLASS CENTURIES?
Salve Severe,

The voting classes are determined by the formula shown here:
http://www.novaroma.org/tabularium/leges/2002-08-01-i.html

As you'll see, the first class is composed of 29% of the assidui
centuries. If there are 50 of those (as there should be) that means
centuries 1 through 15 are first class centuries.

Vale,

CN-EQVIT-MARINVS

Marcus Iulius Severus <marcusiuliusseverus@...> writes:

> Salvete,
>
> Would somebody be so kind as to illustrate me about which are the
> first class centuries? I confess that I am lost at this point...
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52256 From: Marcus Iulius Severus Date: 2007-11-09
Subject: WELL... THANKS, MARINVS
Salve Marinus,

Thanks a lot for your advice.

Vale,

SEVERVS

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52257 From: Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus Date: 2007-11-09
Subject: Re: FIRST CLASS CENTURIES?
Salvete!

I wounder what the reason is that presently NR has 59 centuries insted of 51?
There was a change I missed, or there is something mistake?

Cn. Lentulus


Gnaeus Equitius Marinus <gawne@...> ha scritto:
Salve Severe,

The voting classes are determined by the formula shown here:
http://www.novaroma.org/tabularium/leges/2002-08-01-i.html

As you'll see, the first class is composed of 29% of the assidui
centuries. If there are 50 of those (as there should be) that means
centuries 1 through 15 are first class centuries.

Vale,

CN-EQVIT-MARINVS

Marcus Iulius Severus <marcusiuliusseverus@...> writes:

> Salvete,
>
> Would somebody be so kind as to illustrate me about which are the
> first class centuries? I confess that I am lost at this point...





---------------------------------

---------------------------------
L'email della prossima generazione? Puoi averla con la nuova Yahoo! Mail

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52258 From: Inigo Fernandez Date: 2007-11-09
Subject: Re: Custos Announcement - Century Praerogativa Privilege Expired
Salve, Pompeia Minucia Strabo

What happen if someone didn`t vote according to the schedule?

Optime

Gaius Iulius Adventor

On Nov 9, 2007 11:17 AM, Pompeia Minucia Strabo <
pompeia_minucia_tiberia@...> wrote:

> Po Minucia Strabo Custos Quiritibus Novae Romae S.P.D.
>
>
> I am taking the liberty of making this announcement in accordance with the
> Consular Edict of T. Galerius Paulinus issued Nov. 1, regarding the voting
> schedule of the Comitia Centuriata (Pasted below).
>
> It is now a couple of minutes past Roman time 6pm Nov. 9 and the
> vote-first privilege of the Century Praerogativa, which is Century II, is
> now expired.
>
> This doesn't mean that members of this century can't vote at a later
> time...simply, they won't be counted up front in the Century Praerogativa
> projections.
>
> Voting for First Class,according to the Consul's edict, commences Nov. 10
> (tomorrow) 6 pm Roman Time.
>
> I would encourage you to vote according to the schedule to keep your vote
> in good standing.
>
> Valete omnes.....
>
>
>
>
>
> Ex offico Tiberius Galerius Paulinus
>
> Censor and Augur Gaius Fabius Buteo Modianus has taken the auspices and
> the
> augury was favorable. The Comitia Centuriata is convened to vote for the
> ordinary Centuriate magistracies for calendar year 2761 auc.
>
> The Contio will begin at 6:00 PM, Roma time (Central European Time), on 3
> November and will last until 5:59 PM, Roma time, on 8 November . Voting
> will then commence according to this schedule:
>
> During the Contio the diribitores need to select and announce the Centuria
> Praerogativa.
>
> 6:00 PM, 08 November: Voting by the Centuria Praerogativa *only* begins.
> 6:00 PM, 09 November: Diribitores capture tally of Centuria Praerogativa.
> 6:00 PM, 10 November: Voting by all First Class centuries now permitted.
> 6:00 PM, 11 November: Diribitores capture tally of all First Class
> centuries.
> 6:00 PM, 12 November: Voting by all centuries now permitted.
> 6:00 PM, 13 November: Voting ends.
>
> The diribitores shall provide reports of the progress of the voting in
> accordance with the provisions of the LEX FABIA DE RATIONE COMITIORUM
> CENTURIATORUM.
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> http://mail.yahoo.com
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52259 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2007-11-09
Subject: Re: FIRST CLASS CENTURIES?
Salve Lentule,

Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus <cn_corn_lent@...> writes:

> Salvete!
>
> I wounder what the reason is that presently NR has 59 centuries
> insted of 51?

I have no blessed idea.

> There was a change I missed, or there is something mistake?

There must be some mistake. Given our current assidui population, we
should have no more than 50 assidui centuries, and one capite censi
century. I can only speculate that there was some error when Censor
Octavius ran his software to realign the centuries before the election.

Vale,

CN-EQVIT-MARINVS
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52260 From: pompeia_minucia_tiberia Date: 2007-11-09
Subject: Re: Custos Announcement - Century Praerogativa Privilege Expired
---Salve Iuli:

I will address this momentarily.

Vale
Pompeia


In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Inigo Fernandez" <inigus2002@...>
wrote:
>
> Salve, Pompeia Minucia Strabo
>
> What happen if someone didn`t vote according to the schedule?
>
> Optime
>
> Gaius Iulius Adventor
>
> On Nov 9, 2007 11:17 AM, Pompeia Minucia Strabo <
> pompeia_minucia_tiberia@...> wrote:
>
> > Po Minucia Strabo Custos Quiritibus Novae Romae S.P.D.
> >
> >
> > I am taking the liberty of making this announcement in accordance
with the
> > Consular Edict of T. Galerius Paulinus issued Nov. 1, regarding
the voting
> > schedule of the Comitia Centuriata (Pasted below).
> >
> > It is now a couple of minutes past Roman time 6pm Nov. 9 and the
> > vote-first privilege of the Century Praerogativa, which is
Century II, is
> > now expired.
> >
> > This doesn't mean that members of this century can't vote at a
later
> > time...simply, they won't be counted up front in the Century
Praerogativa
> > projections.
> >
> > Voting for First Class,according to the Consul's edict, commences
Nov. 10
> > (tomorrow) 6 pm Roman Time.
> >
> > I would encourage you to vote according to the schedule to keep
your vote
> > in good standing.
> >
> > Valete omnes.....
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Ex offico Tiberius Galerius Paulinus
> >
> > Censor and Augur Gaius Fabius Buteo Modianus has taken the
auspices and
> > the
> > augury was favorable. The Comitia Centuriata is convened to vote
for the
> > ordinary Centuriate magistracies for calendar year 2761 auc.
> >
> > The Contio will begin at 6:00 PM, Roma time (Central European
Time), on 3
> > November and will last until 5:59 PM, Roma time, on 8 November .
Voting
> > will then commence according to this schedule:
> >
> > During the Contio the diribitores need to select and announce the
Centuria
> > Praerogativa.
> >
> > 6:00 PM, 08 November: Voting by the Centuria Praerogativa *only*
begins.
> > 6:00 PM, 09 November: Diribitores capture tally of Centuria
Praerogativa.
> > 6:00 PM, 10 November: Voting by all First Class centuries now
permitted.
> > 6:00 PM, 11 November: Diribitores capture tally of all First Class
> > centuries.
> > 6:00 PM, 12 November: Voting by all centuries now permitted.
> > 6:00 PM, 13 November: Voting ends.
> >
> > The diribitores shall provide reports of the progress of the
voting in
> > accordance with the provisions of the LEX FABIA DE RATIONE
COMITIORUM
> > CENTURIATORUM.
> >
> > __________________________________________________
> > Do You Yahoo!?
> > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> > http://mail.yahoo.com
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52261 From: Publius Memmius Albucius Date: 2007-11-09
Subject: Re: FIRST CLASS CENTURIES?
P. Memmius Albucius Censor Marino Cn. Cornelio Lentulo s.d.

In good stores, things move fast, in order to follow Fashion's trends.
This evening, there are : 58 century filled pages.

In fact, if we just want having some fun, let us just browse :
http://www.novaroma.org/civitas/album?cmd=show-century¢ury=1000

We thus see that our voting system authorizes as many century pages
that you may put a number after "=".

Actually, it seems this system is reasonable and has limited itself -
do not ask me on which logical grounds... - to 2,999 centuries:

http://www.novaroma.org/civitas/album?cmd=show-century¢ury=2999

I feel like watching 2001 Space Odyssey, when Dave, putting out of
order the vessel computer, hear the computer's voice, saying with a
so human voice: "No Dave... don't do that... I'm scared...I'm gonna
sing a little song for you.."


Last, it seems that century reorganizations have been made during
this day.

I did not check our laws on this point, but is this normal having :
1/ 58 centuries instead of 51;
2/ provided a technical system which has created 2,999 century pages
3/ modifying the composition of the centuries during the ballot ?


Valete ambo,


P. Memmius Albucius


--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus
<cn_corn_lent@...> wrote:
>
> Salvete!
>
> I wounder what the reason is that presently NR has 59 centuries
insted of 51?
> There was a change I missed, or there is something mistake?
>
> Cn. Lentulus
>
>
> Gnaeus Equitius Marinus <gawne@...> ha scritto:
> Salve Severe,
>
> The voting classes are determined by the formula shown here:
> http://www.novaroma.org/tabularium/leges/2002-08-01-i.html
>
> As you'll see, the first class is composed of 29% of the assidui
> centuries. If there are 50 of those (as there should be) that means
> centuries 1 through 15 are first class centuries.
>
> Vale,
>
> CN-EQVIT-MARINVS
>
> Marcus Iulius Severus <marcusiuliusseverus@...> writes:
>
> > Salvete,
> >
> > Would somebody be so kind as to illustrate me about which are the
> > first class centuries? I confess that I am lost at this point...
>
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------
>
> ---------------------------------
> L'email della prossima generazione? Puoi averla con la nuova Yahoo!
Mail
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52262 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2007-11-09
Subject: Answers to all your questions
Salvete quirites,

For answers to all your questions about voting in the Comitia
Centuriata, go to the Files section at
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma/files/ and scroll down to
election_handbook.htm

This handbook was written to answer the questions that come up during
every election. Please read it.

Valete,

CN-EQVIT-MARINVS
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52263 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2007-11-09
Subject: Re: FIRST CLASS CENTURIES?
Salve Albuci,

Publius Memmius Albucius <albucius_aoe@...> writes:

> P. Memmius Albucius Censor Marino Cn. Cornelio Lentulo s.d.

I'm not currently a censor. I think "censorius" is the correct term
for me now.

[cutting to your questions}
> I did not check our laws on this point, but is this normal having :
> 1/ 58 centuries instead of 51;

No.

> 2/ provided a technical system which has created 2,999 century pages

I think it's always been that way. The important thing is that nobody
should be assigned to any century after 51.

> 3/ modifying the composition of the centuries during the ballot ?

No.

I think it's clear at this point that we have irregularities in this
election. The Tribunes should act. I'd recommend calling upon Consul
Galerius to halt the election, make sure things are cleaned up,
restore things to 51 centuries, and then re-start.

Vale,

CN-EQVIT-MARINVS
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52264 From: Lucius Rutilius Minervalis Date: 2007-11-09
Subject: Re: FIRST CLASS CENTURIES?
Salvete Omnes,

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Publius Memmius Albucius"
<albucius_aoe@...> wrote:

> I feel like watching 2001 Space Odyssey, when Dave, putting out of
> order the vessel computer, hear the computer's voice, saying with a
> so human voice: "No Dave... don't do that... I'm scared...I'm gonna
> sing a little song for you.."
>

Oh Yes,I remember: after that, Hal reboot under windows ;)

Valete,

Lucius Rutilius Miervalis
Celticae Legatus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52265 From: pompeia_minucia_tiberia Date: 2007-11-09
Subject: Sensationalism
Pompeia Minucia Gn Equitio Marino sal


I've been reading a couple of posts and I regret that I must object
to a certain 'sensationalism' to your replies to election questions,
regarding century alignments.

First off, it doesn't take a genius to figure that there are more
centuries than there should be.
Even I figure this out! :>)

And this was conveyed to you last night, so you *do* infact *have a
blessed idea* what's happening.

It was disclosed to you that there was an electronic glitch resulting
in an increased number of centuries. Myself a custos and consular I
guess, yourself as former Censor and the two current Censors
discussed the issue over several emails last night, and would
solutions would be viable. Restarting the election was an option
discussed, but other options were too. They trusted you for advice
and counsel.

It was decided that regardless, it was appropriate to let the consul
consider and decide on what course of action to take. He was written
this morning, crosscopied to you.

Why are we not letting the Consul have the day atleast to consider
and make a ruling? The Censors called you into this discussion in
good faith, trusting you to help do the right thing.

So why, are you making innuendos on the mainlist to the effect that
you know nothing about it? Cutting loose, advice giving, speculating
as if you weren't consulted in the first place?

Maybe you think we should start anew, and certainly the thought
crossed my mind too. Remember I am a Custos, but I will allow an
expanse of time to let the magistrates work on this problem. As I
agreed to. It is early in the game, and the Century Praerogavita has
just finished voting. If there is a way to lawfully salvage this
mess in a day or so before the next voting segment starts, then I'm
willing to listen to ideas atleast. And I don't take any wooden
nickles...most people know that.

People of Nova Roma, the Censors were not trying to hide
anything...that's why they called persons, like Marinus and myself,
whom they felt they could trust for advice. They were honest with the
Consul, and it looks now, as conveyed by recent posts, as though they
are goofing about haphazardly..no...they were making every honest
effort to ameliorate the situation. This is a complex election system
and the more complicated the plumbing, the easier it is for the drain
to plug...plain and simple.

Again, Marine, I wish you wouldn't pretend to be trying to help the
Censors and Consul and then come out independently looking like you
have all the *solutions* and that nobody asked for your help. They
darned well did...and you 'do' have a 'blessed' idea.

When you look good at the expense of others, I think of Shania
Twain's line 'That don't impress me much'.

Sorry, but shame on you!

Pompeia
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52266 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2007-11-09
Subject: Re: Sensationalism
pompeia_minucia_tiberia <pompeia_minucia_tiberia@...> writes:

> Pompeia Minucia Gn Equitio Marino sal

Answered privately.

CN-EQVIT-MARINVS
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52267 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2007-11-09
Subject: De centuriis: Re: [Nova-Roma] Sensationalism
> A. Tullia Scholastica Praetrix Pompeiae Minuciae Tiberiae custodi Cn. Equitio
> Marino censorio quiritibus bonae voluntatis S.P.D.
>
> I have checked the first 16 centuries, and see that C III has two members,
> and X to XVI have four, whereas the rest of the first ten have the now-normal
> three. I had been in II all year, then checked the other day, and found
> myself in X, and now am back in II...after I thought that I was not in
> praerogativa any more. Somehow, too, I thought that the first 16 were
> first-class centuries. Clearly no one can be in two centuries at once...there
> does indeed seem to be a glitch, as this change of century assignment seems to
> have occurred during the voting. I believe I checked during the praerogativa
> voting, and found myself still in X, and now am back in II. ÂŒSplain, please.
>
> Vale, et valete.
>
>
>
> Pompeia Minucia Gn Equitio Marino sal
>
> I've been reading a couple of posts and I regret that I must object
> to a certain 'sensationalism' to your replies to election questions,
> regarding century alignments.
>
> First off, it doesn't take a genius to figure that there are more
> centuries than there should be.
> Even I figure this out! :>)
>
> And this was conveyed to you last night, so you *do* infact *have a
> blessed idea* what's happening.
>
> It was disclosed to you that there was an electronic glitch resulting
> in an increased number of centuries. Myself a custos and consular I
> guess, yourself as former Censor and the two current Censors
> discussed the issue over several emails last night, and would
> solutions would be viable. Restarting the election was an option
> discussed, but other options were too. They trusted you for advice
> and counsel.
>
> It was decided that regardless, it was appropriate to let the consul
> consider and decide on what course of action to take. He was written
> this morning, crosscopied to you.
>
> Why are we not letting the Consul have the day atleast to consider
> and make a ruling? The Censors called you into this discussion in
> good faith, trusting you to help do the right thing.
>
> So why, are you making innuendos on the mainlist to the effect that
> you know nothing about it? Cutting loose, advice giving, speculating
> as if you weren't consulted in the first place?
>
> Maybe you think we should start anew, and certainly the thought
> crossed my mind too. Remember I am a Custos, but I will allow an
> expanse of time to let the magistrates work on this problem. As I
> agreed to. It is early in the game, and the Century Praerogavita has
> just finished voting. If there is a way to lawfully salvage this
> mess in a day or so before the next voting segment starts, then I'm
> willing to listen to ideas atleast. And I don't take any wooden
> nickles...most people know that.
>
> People of Nova Roma, the Censors were not trying to hide
> anything...that's why they called persons, like Marinus and myself,
> whom they felt they could trust for advice. They were honest with the
> Consul, and it looks now, as conveyed by recent posts, as though they
> are goofing about haphazardly..no...they were making every honest
> effort to ameliorate the situation. This is a complex election system
> and the more complicated the plumbing, the easier it is for the drain
> to plug...plain and simple.
>
> Again, Marine, I wish you wouldn't pretend to be trying to help the
> Censors and Consul and then come out independently looking like you
> have all the *solutions* and that nobody asked for your help. They
> darned well did...and you 'do' have a 'blessed' idea.
>
> When you look good at the expense of others, I think of Shania
> Twain's line 'That don't impress me much'.
>
> Sorry, but shame on you!
>
> Pompeia
>




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52268 From: David Kling (Modianus) Date: 2007-11-09
Subject: Re: FIRST CLASS CENTURIES?
Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus Gnaeo Cornelio Lentulo salutem dicit

There are now 58 centuries because of the number of active citizens in
Nova Roma. From my understanding of the technical side of things, the
additional centuries were generated when the program was ran. Censor
Octavius can answer these questions far better than I can.

Nova Roma NEEDS to start thinking SIMPLER instead of more complex. It
might be nice and fashionable to be as historically accurate as
possible, but it is not practical and it needs to be simplified in the
spirit of antiquity. The technical side has not caught up to the
additional laws and it has become extremely difficult to accommodate
such things.

Vale;

Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus

On Nov 9, 2007 2:23 PM, Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus <cn_corn_lent@...> wrote:

> Salvete!
>
> I wounder what the reason is that presently NR has 59 centuries insted of
> 51?
> There was a change I missed, or there is something mistake?
>
> Cn. Lentulus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52269 From: Pompeia Minucia Strabo Date: 2007-11-09
Subject: Edictum Custos Suffragia Comitia Populi Tributa et Comitia Centuriat
Po Minucia Strabo Quiritibus Novae Romae S.P.D.

I shall certify no votes in the current Comitia Populi Tributa or Comitia Centuriata elections. I would encourage my colleage G. Vipsanius Agrippa to take the same stance, although I realize I cannot compel him to do so.

I issue this not out of antagonism but out of good faith that our Censors and Consul will furnish us with a workable solution to the current cista/century problems or the Consul will call for a revote in these elections. He is keenly aware, as are the Censors, of the need for a decision, which I'm confident he will get to us soon.

These edict shall be in force until more permanent direction is received by the Consul regarding the current election process, at which time I will lift it, as I am doing this in a spirit of cooperation, interest for the rights of the populace and candidates and faith in our magistrates that they have the same interests in mind.

Valete omnes



__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52270 From: David Kling (Modianus) Date: 2007-11-09
Subject: Re: Edictum Custos Suffragia Comitia Populi Tributa et Comitia Centu
Salvete:

I would encourage Consul Paulinus to issue an edict (which has the
force of law) calling the Comitia to order with less complex
regulations. Perhaps in a system that we used to have that was
completely automated. The database simply cannot effectively handle
our current system without major re-working and there is NO ONE who
can do this, or is able to do this.

I recommend the centuries and tribes be recalculated and each century
counted. This sequential system needs thrown out!

Valete:

Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus

On Nov 9, 2007 5:46 PM, Pompeia Minucia Strabo
<pompeia_minucia_tiberia@...> wrote:
>
> Po Minucia Strabo Quiritibus Novae Romae S.P.D.
>
> I shall certify no votes in the current Comitia Populi Tributa or Comitia
> Centuriata elections. I would encourage my colleage G. Vipsanius Agrippa to
> take the same stance, although I realize I cannot compel him to do so.
>
> I issue this not out of antagonism but out of good faith that our Censors
> and Consul will furnish us with a workable solution to the current
> cista/century problems or the Consul will call for a revote in these
> elections. He is keenly aware, as are the Censors, of the need for a
> decision, which I'm confident he will get to us soon.
>
> These edict shall be in force until more permanent direction is received by
> the Consul regarding the current election process, at which time I will lift
> it, as I am doing this in a spirit of cooperation, interest for the rights
> of the populace and candidates and faith in our magistrates that they have
> the same interests in mind.
>
> Valete omnes
>
>
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> http://mail.yahoo.com
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52271 From: Stephen Gallagher Date: 2007-11-09
Subject: EDICTUM CONSULARE XXIII-MMDCCLX A.U.C
EDICTUM CONSULARE XXIII-MMDCCLX A.U.C

Ex offico Tiberius Galerius Paulinus

I herby withdraw my edicts convening both the Comitia Centuriata
and the Comitia Populi Tributa.

I declare all votes cast to be null and void and without legal effect.

Within the next seventy-two hours I will ask Censor and Augur
Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus to again take the auspices and
I will then reconvene both the Comitia Centuriata and the
Comitia Populi Tributa to elect our magistrate for 2761 a.u.c.
and to enact laws.

In light of the fact that we did not have enough candidates
for all offices I will also except additional candidates for
those offices only that still need a full allotment of candidates.

ALL A CITIZENS NEED DO TO RUN FOR ANY OF THESE
IS TO POST TO THE MAIN LIST OF NOVA ROMA.

I WILL SEE THE POST THERE.

The offices up for election are:

AEDILIS CURULIS (2 openings) We have one candidate

QUAESTOR (8 openings) We have three candidates

CUSTOS (2 openings) We have one candidate

The ballots will also include our current candidates for these
offices and for Censor, Consul and Praetor.

The proposed legislation will also be placed on the ballot.
In addition to the leges that I have already proposed I will be
adding a few more. One will be to simplify our elections based o
n the recommendations of those who have to carry them out.

I also offer my profound apologies to the citizens of Nova Roma.
As Consul and as the conniving magistrate I take full responsibility
for this turn of events.

Given by my hand a.d. IV Id. Nov. MMDCCLX A.U.C.
( November 10 2760 A.U.C.), at 00:45 Roman time in
the consulship of L. Arminius Faustus and Ti. Galerius Paulinus.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52272 From: Pompeia Minucia Strabo Date: 2007-11-09
Subject: Fwd: Edictum Custos Suffragia Comitia Populi Tributa et Comitia Cen
Pompeia Minucia Strabo Custos Quiritibus Novae Romae S.P.D.

In deference to Edictum Consulare XXIII issued earlier this evening, I hereby withdraw my edict, see below.

Valete Omnes


To: nova roma <nova-roma@yahoogroups.com>, novaroma-announce@yahoogroups.com,
suffragiaromana@yahoogroups.com
From: Pompeia Minucia Strabo <pompeia_minucia_tiberia@...>
Date: Fri, 9 Nov 2007 14:46:11 -0800 (PST)

Po Minucia Strabo Quiritibus Novae Romae S.P.D.

I shall certify no votes in the current Comitia Populi Tributa or Comitia Centuriata elections. I would encourage my colleage G. Vipsanius Agrippa to take the same stance, although I realize I cannot compel him to do so.

I issue this not out of antagonism but out of good faith that our Censors and Consul will furnish us with a workable solution to the current cista/century problems or the Consul will call for a revote in these elections. He is keenly aware, as are the Censors, of the need for a decision, which I'm confident he will get to us soon.

These edict shall be in force until more permanent direction is received by the Consul regarding the current election process, at which time I will lift it, as I am doing this in a spirit of cooperation, interest for the rights of the populace and candidates and faith in our magistrates that they have the same interests in mind.

Valete omnes


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com



__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52273 From: marcushoratius Date: 2007-11-09
Subject: a. d. IIII Eidus Novembris
M. Moravius Piscinus Horatianus Quiritibus et omnibus salutem
plurimam dicit: Maiores vestri omnum magnarum rerum et principia
exoris a Dis sunt et finem statuerunt.

Hodie est ante diem IIII Eidus Novembris; haec dies comitialis est:

"Now night had fallen, and all weary things, all shapes of beast or
bird, the wide world over, lay deep in slumber. So beneath the arch
of a cold sky Aeneas laid him down upon the riverbank, his heart sore
tried by so much war and sorrow, and gave over his body to its long-
delayed repose. There, 'twixt the poplars by the gentle stream, the
River-Father, genius of that place, old Tiberinus visibly rose up; a
cloak of gray-green lawn he wore, his hair overhung with wreath of
reeds. In soothing words thus, to console Aeneas' cares, he spoke:

"'Seed of the Gods! who bringest to my shore thy Trojan city wrested
from her foe, a stronghold everlasting, Latium's plain and fair
Laurentum long have looked for thee. Here truly is thy home. Turn not
away. Here the true guardians of thy hearth shall be. Fear not the
gathering war. The wrath of Heaven has stilled its swollen wave. A
sign I tell: Lest thou shouldst deem this message of thy sleep a
vain, deluding dream, thou soon shalt find in the oak-copses on my
margent green, a huge sow, with her newly-littered brood of thirty
young; along the ground she lies, snow-white, and round her udders
her white young. There shall thy city stand, and there thy toil shall
find untroubled rest. After the lapse of thrice ten rolling years,
Ascanius shall found a city there of noble name, White-City, Alba; 't
is no dream I sing! But I instruct thee now by what wise way the
impending wars may bring thee victory: receive the counsel, though
the words be few: within this land are men of Arcady, of Pallas'
line, who, following in the train of King Evander and his men-at-
arms, built them a city in the hills, and chose (honoring Pallas,
their Pelasgian sire), the name of Pallanteum. They make war
incessant with the Latins. Therefore call this people to thy side and
bind them close in federated power. My channel fair and shaded shore
shall guide thee where they dwell, and thy strong oarsmen on my
waters borne shall mount my falling stream. Rise, goddess-born, and
ere the starlight fade give honor due to Juno, and with supplicating
vow avert Her wrath and frown. But unto me make offering in thy
victorious hour, in time to come. I am the copious flood which thou
beholdest chafing at yon shores and parting fruitful fields: cerulean
stream of Tiber, favored greatly of high Heaven. Here shall arise my
house magnificent, a city of all cities chief and crown'."

"So spake the river-god, and sank from view down to his deepest cave;
then night and sleep together from Aeneas fled away. He rose, and to
the orient beams of morn his forehead gave; in both his hollowed palms
he held the sacred waters of the stream, and called aloud: "O ye
Laurentian nymphs, whence flowing rills be born, and chiefly thou, O
Father Tiber, worshipped stream divine, accept Aeneas, and from peril
save! If in some hallowed lake or haunted spring thy power, pitying
my woes, abides, or wheresoever the blessed place be found whence
first thy beauty flows, there evermore my hands shall bring thee gift
and sacrifice. O chief and sovereign of Hesperian streams, O river-
god that holdest the plenteous horn, protect us, and confirm thy
words divine!" ~ P. Vergilius Maro, Aeneid 8.18-79


Today's thought is from the Meditations of Marcus Aurelius 4.40

"Constantly regard the universe as one living being, having one
substance and one soul; and observe how all things have reference to
one perception, the perception of this one living being; and how all
things act with one movement; and how all things are the cooperating
causes of all things which exist; observe too the continuous spinning
of the thread and the contexture of the matrix."
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52274 From: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com Date: 2007-11-10
Subject: Election Information, 11/11/2007, 12:15 am
Reminder from:   Nova-Roma Yahoo! Group
 
Title:   Election Information
 
Date:   Sunday November 11, 2007
Time:   12:15 am - 1:15 am
Repeats:   This event repeats every day until Saturday November 17, 2007.
Next reminder:   The next reminder for this event will be sent in 11 hours, 59 minutes.
Location:   http://novaroma.org/nr/Election_MMDCCLX_(Nova_Roma)
Notes:   Election information is located at http://novaroma.org/nr/Election_MMDCCLX_%28Nova_Roma%29
 
Copyright © 2007  Yahoo! Inc. All Rights Reserved | Terms of Service | Privacy Policy
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52275 From: C. Curius Saturninus Date: 2007-11-10
Subject: LUDI PLEBEII MUNERA GLADIATORIA
Salvete,

Welcome to the Ludi Plebeii Munera Gladiatoria!

Today we have three fights: the winners of the first fights will face
each other at the final fight.


But before the fights, a couple of reminders:

-Today is the last day to submit your chariot to the Ludi Circenses,
see more at:
http://www.novaroma.org/nr/LudiPlebeii_Circenses_Subscription

-Today is also the last day to submit your work to the Art Contest:
http://www.novaroma.org/nr/LudiPlebeii_Art_Contest


And now to the Arena:


Fight 1

At the arena there are four fighters circling their introduction tour
before starting the fight. Two Thraexes with their curved sicca-
swords. One Secutor with his gladius and scutum and one Dimachaerus
with his two sicca-swords.

First of the Thraexes is Trypho and he is sponsored by L. Vitellius
Triarius. Trypho comes from the island of Thasos from the North
Aegean Sea. He looks strong and well trained, but nothing much of him
is known in the wider circles of the city. The word goes around the
audience that Sp. Mercurius Pilatus, the famous lanista from Ludus
Vitellius has a great faith for his future career and has even put
some considerable bet for his victory, he should know!

Second Thraex is Nemo and he is sponsored by C. Arminius Reccanellus.
Nemo since no-one knows his real name, but it's evident that he is a
Sarmatian. He has a deep purple scar on his face, and many more nasty
looking scars over his body. He looks strong. He looks mean. And he
really looks blood thirsty!

Behind them comes the Dimachaerus, Fabianix, also sponsored by C.
Arminius Reccanellus. Fabianix is a cold blooded giant from Gallia,
with blue eyes and black hair. There are always some commotion at the
audience while he walks by, certain aristocratic ladies seem to blush
heavily, and long looks are traded. The rumour circulates over the
audience that Fabianix's services are wanted also outside the arena.
Be that as it may, he still looks dangerous fighter indeed and he is
said to be very skillful.

And last, but not least comes the Secutor, Scylax, sponsored by L.
Vitellius Triarius. You should remember his victory at the Ludi
Caesariensis! He comes from Chalcis, from the island of Euboia. We
know he is a master against retiarius-type of fighters, but we have
no reason to assume that wouldn't fair well against any fighter, and
that tells something about him.

The parade is over and the fighters are to take their positions.
Let's see which pairs we get this time.

Fighter 1
name: Trypho the Thraex
owner: Lucius Vitellius Triarius

Fighter 2
name: Fabianix, the Dimachaerus
owner: Caius Arminius Reccanellus

Trypho the Thraex makes the first choice, perhaps he is under
preassure to show what he can do in this first big event of his. He
chooses to attack against Fabianix, the Dimachareus from Gallia. It
seems that Fabianix has a more defensive tactic, and the fierce first
attack of Trypho gets cheers from the audience, he takes fast steps
forward towards Fabianix, and sends his sicca towards the left upper
torso of Fabianix. Fabianix has no trouble in defending this kind of
visible attack, and he makes his defence secure by using both his
siccae swords. But here is where the both aggressiviness and skill of
Trypho comes into light, he had anticipated Fabianix's defensive
move, and uses his small parmula-shield to direct a hit to the right
tigh of Fabianix. Clearly his aim was to produce blow strong enough
to limit Fabianix's movement, but it seems that Fabianix is both
strong and durable, and the clever hit did not shaken him at all. The
eagerness of Trypho has perhaps now turning into his own disadvantage
since as more experienced Fabianix now knows what to expect from him.
Should he succeed in the first move to shaken Fabianix's self-
confidence he would have got a great start to the fight.

But Trypho isn't going to give up. Immediately right after the first
attack, he quickly changes his direction, and start another attack
from the right side of Fabianix. While Fabianix hasn't got too much
trouble in defending this time either, it also keeps the initiative
in the hands of Trypho. The fight goes on along this path for some
time, Trypho making quick attacks that Fabianix can defend against
quite easily, but Trypho setting the pace all the time. At some point
Fabianix gets his chance of attack as it seems that Trypho is wearing
down from constant movement, after all he has heavier equipment. Now
Fabianix's skills come into light, he consentrates his strength into
fierce paced attacks against Trypho, and it seems that the table are
turned, Trypho is now in defence. Fabianix gets the first blood
hitting Trypho's unprotected left arm, but the hit doesn't seem fatal
or even critical. Will this change the setting?

It seems that it won't, Trypho has all along being constantly aiming
hits into the right tigh of Fabianix, perhaps percieving it as the
weak part of Fabianix, and this strategy seems to start bearing
fruit, since Fabianix clearly is beginning to be careful with it and
visibly slowing down. Both fighters are tired, but Trypho puts all
his strength into decisive attack, aiming first to the weak tigh of
Fabianix, and making Fabianix lose his balance while defending. Then
Fabianix's soft, unprotected torso is left unprotected, and Trypho
manages to cut couple of deep wounds there. The fight clearly is
over, both fighters lower their weapons, and Trypho ask the audience
what should be done, to kill Fabianix or not. The audience seems
divided and uncertain, and then Plebeian Aedile in charge of the
games rises and signals that Fabianix should keep his life, audience
cheers and some hansome amount of coins is thrown to the arena.
Trypho is the winner from the first fight!


Fight 2

Fighter 1
Scylax the Secutor
owner: Lucius Vitellius Triarius

Fighter 2
name: Nemo, the Thraex
owner: Caius Arminius Reccanellus

While Trypho attacked Fabianix, the second pair was to be Scylax the
Secutor and Nemo the Thraex. This is clearly going to be a popular
fight, a Greek style fighter against a Roman style fighter. The big
angry Sarmatian Nemo doesn't waste time, and puts some good first
attacks against Scylax. There's no problem for Scylax to defend
himself, he has his big shield, and can take many attacks without
problems. Nemo however has the spirit in him, and he is clearly
setting the pace of the fight with his attacks. He aims into less
protected back of Scylax with his curved sicca sword, but he must be
careful since the upper rim of Scylax scutum is nasty shining
metallic one, and should that hit perfectly from downwards into sword
or wrist of Nemo, he would be swordless soon.

Scylax is also an experienced fighter, and what one couldn't do with
gladius and scutum in any case! It's his turn to start attack. His
challenge is get close enough to use his short gladius and avoiding
the longer sicca of Nemo. Scutum is his best friend in this, the
bulky large shield can give as well as recieve mighty blows, and
Scylax knows this very well. While Nemo is readying himself into
another fierce attack, Scylax makes surprise movement forward and
while temporarily risking his defence, uses his shield to hit Nemo's
smaller parmula shield, and to send it flying across the air. Now
Nemo is in trouble, with only one weapon against Scylax's well
protecting equipment, he has to do something remarkable to turn the
tide.

And this is what he does. Obviously he cannot out-weapon Scylax, so
he decides to out-smart him. Nemo pretends to lose his temper and
starts a seemingly mindless attack against Scylax, who thinks he now
has a chance to crouch and attack under his shield into lower body of
Nemo. But this is what Nemo wants him to think, and can now utilize
his greater height and lower weight into breathtaking jump and
horrible hit with his sword into the front of the scutum of Scylax.
Scylax cannot help it, the heavy scutum, the mighty hit into it and
his already somewhat tired hand had to give up, and he loses the
control of his scutum, and while he can correct the situation by fast
movement, he is hopelessly late, and lighter Nemo can put a nasty cut
into his shield arm.

Scylax now has to give up the heavy scutum, and is suddenly in
disadvantaged position with his short gladius. Still the fight is
fierce and nothing is spared, but eventually Nemo manages to draw
blood from Scylax's throat, making it clear, that it could have been
a fatal hit. Scylax has no alternative but to lower his arms. The
crowd cheers for both fighters and wants that bravely fought Scylax
can spare his life. Perhaps the audience is shaken from the smileless
outlook of big Sarmatian, who without ceremonies grabs some gold
coins from the the sand and walks away. Scylax is relieved, and also
lefts the arena, but as the loser of the fight.


Final fight

After a brief pause the audience is getting ready for the final fight
of the night. The winners from previous fights are to meet each other
and see who's the winner of Ludi Plebeii Munera this time. But
there's a sigh of surprise in the audience, to the arena are not
going to step Nemo and Trypho, but Nemo and someone else. It seems
that the would Trypho got in the first fight was eventually nastier
than it seemed at first, and he cannot use his hand. Will this mean
that the winner is Nemo? No, it doesn't. The word has been going
around for some time, along those who generally know about these
things, that there has been a new fighter entering the city in last
week, a fearsome Thracian monster, if nothing less. And the audience
is to find out that this is true. The second fighter rising to the
arena is a huge Dimachaerus with clearly thracian characteristics.
But who is he? He is called the Minotaur because of his broad
shoulders which resemble ox's shoulders, and one is thinking wheather
he'd be stronger than your average ox! He is sponsored by Marca
Hortensia Maior and kindly arranged in haste to the arena.

So there you have it, a Thracian monster versus gloomy Sarmatian!

Fighter 1
name: Nemo, the Thraex
owner: Caius Arminius Reccanellus

Fighter 2
name: The Minotaur, the Thracian dimachaerus monster!
owner: Marca Hortensia Maior

The Minotaur makes his aim clear right from the beginning, he wants
to decapitate Nemo, he is signalling this with his gestures before
the fight. However with similar sword Minotaur cannot carelessly
approach Nemo, he has to keep his defences. Nemo on the other hand is
still somewhat tried from the last fight, not that it really is at
this level a big difference as the fighters are so highly
professional, but perhaps it still could be decisive difference. On
the other hand Nemo is all warmed up while this is the first fight of
the day for Minotaur, and that could mean something too. Both of the
fighters are strong and evidently they are both killers with very
little humanity left in them, horrendous barbarians.

Nemo has to be the more careful one at first, let the Minotaur show
what he can do. While bulky, it becomes clear right away that
Minotaur is fast one too, and with his very first attack he manages
to draw first blood from Nemo. However the Sarmatian has more scars
than he probaly can even count, so one cut here or there doesn't make
any difference to him. Nemo defends and the Minotaur attacks. However
the fighters are evenly skilled, and it takes not too long after Nemo
manages to cut the Minotaur too.

The fight goes on and both fighters have their chances, but are even.
Both have now several wounds and both are bleeding. Now the previous
fight of Nemo begins to take it's toll, he cannot keep this pace too
much longer, and while Minotaur too is clearly tired, he is in much
better overall shape than Nemo. Minotaur thus gets his chance and
manages to inflict a deep wound into Nemo's arm which already has
suffered this evening. It seems to be only a question of time until
the Minotaur will win.

But least we forget that the dark, proud and smileless Sarmatian will
not give up. There's the point in the fight where he realises that
there's nothing to lose anymore, he is not himself going to give up
and the winning Minotaurus won't either. So he gathers all his
strength he has left and starts so fierce attack against the Minotaur
that Minotaur cannot but take steps back and defend. Nemo manages to
hit Minotaurs second sword away, and while Minotaur is switching
hands for the only sword left, Nemo throws away his shield. This
gathers raving cheers from the audience, and Nemo throws himself into
last attack.

Nemo and Minotaur both are now partly very weakly protected, and have
only attack as their real option to win the fight. Nemo has managed
to drive Minotaur close to the arena wall, and at this point the
Minotaur decides to put his everything into attack, and suddenly
charges forward against Nemo. Nemo almost loses his balance, and
Minotaur raises his hands into decapitating blow, but Nemo's fight is
not over yet, and quickly he cuts a deep wound to the stomache of
Minotaur, who has to bend and holds his stomache while falling down.
It seems that his guts are coming out from the body. Nemo stands by
his enemy and looks down to him without any expression in his face.
Then he raises his head and looks to the audience, which explodes
into fierce cheering. But still there's no expression of joy on
Nemo's face, he just walks away as he last time, as winner, but not
as a happy one.

The chilling coldness of Nemo leaves at first the audience into
ambivalent state of mind. Clearly the fight was one to remember, but
the way the winner took it was perhaps even more touching and
remarkable. Strange winner that dark Sarmatian was. Even some time
after the fight, the people were troubled by his behaviour, but there
was never an explanation. Perhaps he was there in the arena to remind
about the tragedies of life and to make the audience to think what it
means to be a human and what makes our life worth living, about the
value of life and uniqueness of each of us.

Valete,

C. Curius Saturninus
(Mikko Sillanpää)

Senator - Aedilis Plebis - Propraetor Provinciae Thules
Rector Academia Thules ad Studia Romana Antiqua et Nova

e-mail: c.curius@...
www.academiathules.org
thule.novaroma.org




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52276 From: M·CVR·COMPLVTENSIS Date: 2007-11-10
Subject: Comitia Plebis: MEMENTO
Marcus Curiatius Complutensis Tribunus Plebis omnes civibus Novae Romae SPD

The cista to vote in the Comitia Plebis Tributa was opened at 15:23 hours (Roma time) , 6th November, therefore the election will take place from 15:23 hours (Roma time)6th November through 15:00 hours (Roma time) , 14th November.



Valete

MARCVS CVRIATIVS COMPLVTENSIS
TRIBVNVS PLEBIS
NOVA ROMA

Ex paucis multa, ex minimis maxima


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52277 From: Stephen Gallagher Date: 2007-11-10
Subject: Any more candidates?
Salvet Nova Romans

Are there any citizens who wish to stand for election to any
of the offices for which we still need candidates?

AEDILIS CURULIS
QUAESTOR
CUSTOS

Valete

Ti. Galerius Paulinus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52278 From: Maior Date: 2007-11-10
Subject: Re: Comitia Plebis: MEMENTO
Salve Complutensis;
when are the various centuries voting? Would you post it
please as it always is a source of confusion.
bene vale
Marca Hortensia Maior
candidate for censor
Election page:http://tinyurl.com/ysu2lv



> The cista to vote in the Comitia Plebis Tributa was opened at
15:23 hours (Roma time) , 6th November, therefore the election will
take place from 15:23 hours (Roma time)6th November through 15:00
hours (Roma time) , 14th November.
>
>
>
> Valete
>
> MARCVS CVRIATIVS COMPLVTENSIS
> TRIBVNVS PLEBIS
> NOVA ROMA
>
> Ex paucis multa, ex minimis maxima
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52279 From: QFabiusMaxmi@aol.com Date: 2007-11-10
Subject: Re: Any more candidates? Fabius Maximus -Quaestor
In a message dated 11/10/2007 12:26:34 PM Pacific Standard Time,
spqr753@... writes:

QUAESTOR

I'll stand for Quaestor. With the current strike, it'll be good to get back
into Nova Roma government.

I have been at Nova Roma since Aug 1998. I have held all major Magistrices
except Censor, and I am well versed in Roman History and Poltical Systems. I
have written many a monograph on the subject. Have a state of the art PC, with
a dedicated T-1 line.

I am more then qualified to stand for Quaestor.

Q. Fabius Maximus



************************************** See what's new at http://www.aol.com


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52280 From: Maior Date: 2007-11-10
Subject: Re: Comitia Plebis: MEMENTO
Salvete;
scratch that we're talking about the CPT...we're also in the
middle of the Nova Roma Census, so I'm a bit preoccupied.
Maior
> when are the various centuries voting? Would you post it
> please as it always is a source of confusion.
> bene vale
> Marca Hortensia Maior
> candidate for censor
> Election page:http://tinyurl.com/ysu2lv
>
>
>
> > The cista to vote in the Comitia Plebis Tributa was opened at
> 15:23 hours (Roma time) , 6th November, therefore the election
will
> take place from 15:23 hours (Roma time)6th November through
15:00
> hours (Roma time) , 14th November.
> >
> >
> >
> > Valete
> >
> > MARCVS CVRIATIVS COMPLVTENSIS
> > TRIBVNVS PLEBIS
> > NOVA ROMA
> >
> > Ex paucis multa, ex minimis maxima
> >
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52281 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2007-11-10
Subject: Re: Comitia Plebis: MEMENTO
Salve Marca Hortensia,

Maior <rory12001@...> writes:

> Salve Complutensis;

I'm not Complutensis, but I'll take the liberty of answering this
since it's posted out in public.

> when are the various centuries voting?

The Comitia Plebis Tributa votes by tribes, not by centuries. All
tribes vote at the same time.

> candidate for censor

Right.


CN-EQVIT-MARINVS
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52282 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2007-11-10
Subject: Re: Any more candidates? Fabius Maximus -Quaestor
Salve Quinte Fabi,

Thank you for stepping forward and doing this. It's a good example
you're setting.

Vale,

CN-EQVIT-MARINVS

QFabiusMaxmi@... writes:

> I'll stand for Quaestor.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52283 From: M·CVR·COMPLVTENSIS Date: 2007-11-10
Subject: Re: Comitia Plebis: MEMENTO
Salvete Marine, Maior omesque

Marine thank you for clarifying this.

As far as I know there is no problem in voting by tribes.

Valete

M·CVRIATIVS·COMPLVTENSIS
TRIBVNVS PLEBIS
PROPRAETOR HISPANIAE
SCRIBA CENSORIS CFBM
NOVA ROMA

-------------------------------------------

ex paucis multa, ex minimis maxima


----- Original Message -----
From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Saturday, November 10, 2007 10:22 PM
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: Comitia Plebis: MEMENTO


Salve Marca Hortensia,

Maior <rory12001@...> writes:

> Salve Complutensis;

I'm not Complutensis, but I'll take the liberty of answering this
since it's posted out in public.

> when are the various centuries voting?

The Comitia Plebis Tributa votes by tribes, not by centuries. All
tribes vote at the same time.

> candidate for censor

Right.

CN-EQVIT-MARINVS




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52284 From: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com Date: 2007-11-10
Subject: Election Information, 11/11/2007, 12:15 am
Reminder from:   Nova-Roma Yahoo! Group
 
Title:   Election Information
 
Date:   Sunday November 11, 2007
Time:   12:15 am - 1:15 am
Repeats:   This event repeats every day until Saturday November 17, 2007.
Location:   http://novaroma.org/nr/Election_MMDCCLX_(Nova_Roma)
Notes:   Election information is located at http://novaroma.org/nr/Election_MMDCCLX_%28Nova_Roma%29
 
Copyright © 2007  Yahoo! Inc. All Rights Reserved | Terms of Service | Privacy Policy
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52285 From: L. Salix Date: 2007-11-10
Subject: Re: Any more candidates?
Salvete,

I would like to stand for Quaestor. My Roman name is Lucius Salix Cicero. I have been a member of Nova Roman since 1st Jan 2001.
I have never run for office before, but I would now like to devote more time to NR. If elected, I will do my best to serve all of NR.
Valvete
L. Salix Cicero


From: Stephen Gallagher
Sent: Saturday, November 10, 2007 3:25 PM
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com ; NovaRoma-Announce@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Any more candidates?


Salvet Nova Romans

Are there any citizens who wish to stand for election to any
of the offices for which we still need candidates?

AEDILIS CURULIS
QUAESTOR
CUSTOS

Valete

Ti. Galerius Paulinus





[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52286 From: Stephen Gallagher Date: 2007-11-10
Subject: The Comitia Populi Tributa is called
The Comitia Populi Tributa is called

Ex offico Tiberius Galerius Paulinus

Censor and Augur Gaius Fabius Buteo Modianus has taken the auspices and the
augury was favorable. The Comitia Populi Tributa is convened to vote for the
Tribal magistrates for calendar year 2760 auc and to enact legislation as
listed.

The Contio will begin at 06:00 PM, Roma time (Central European Time), on 11
November and will last until 5:59 PM Roma time, on 12 November..( We have
already had a Contio that has lasted the required days).

Voting will then commence according to this schedule:
06:00 PM, 12 November: Voting by ALL tribes starts. (Roma time)
05:59 PM, 18 November: Voting by ALL tribes ends. (Roma time)

The presidium (the first tribe to be counted) shall be Tribe VII: Sabatina

The candidates up for election are:

AEDILIS CURULIS (2 openings)

Gnaeus Equitius Marinus
Date of Citizenship: 23 May 2001
http://www.novaroma.org/civitas/album?id=2356

P. Memmius Albucius Y
Date of Citizenship: 15 May 2004
http://www.novaroma.org/civitas/album?id=7425

******************************************

QUAESTOR (8 openings)

Titus Arminius Genialis
Date of Citizenship: 20 October 2002
http://www.novaroma.org/civitas/album?id=4760

Q. Fabius Maximus
Date of Citizenship: 1 August 1998
http://www.novaroma.org/civitas/album?id=10

Lucius Salix Cicero
Date of Citizenship: 1 January 2001
http://www.novaroma.org/civitas/album?id=1513

A. Tullia Scholastica
Date of Citizenship: 15 October 2003
http://www.novaroma.org/civitas/album?id=6596

Lucius Vitellius Triarius
Date of Citizenship 25 January 2005
http://www.novaroma.org/civitas/album?id=8446

*****************************************

ROGATOR (2 openings)

Gnaeus Equitius Marinus
Date of Citizenship: 23 May 2001
http://www.novaroma.org/civitas/album?id=2356

Lucius Rutilius Minervalis
Date of Citizenship: 1 August 2002
http://www.novaroma.org/civitas/album?id=4281


DIRIBITOR (4 openings)

Caius Aemilius Crassus
Date of Citizenship: 15 February 2007
http://www.novaroma.org/civitas/album?id=10832

Gaius Iulius Adventor
Date of Citizenship: 21 December 2006
http://www.novaroma.org/civitas/album?id=10678

Marcus Martianius Lupus
Date of Citizenship: 29 April 2007
http://www.novaroma.org/civitas/album?id=11054

Sextus Postumius Albus
Date of Citizenship : 17 December 2006
http://www.novaroma.org/civitas/album?id=10672

---------------

CUSTOS (2 openings)

Stepahanus Ullerius Venator
Date of Citizenship: 1 July 1998
http://www.novaroma.org/civitas/album?id=252

---------------

EDITOR COMMENTARIORUM (editor of the Aquila, 1 opening)

No candidates.
*******************************************
Lex Galeria de Census

The time allotted to complete the Census 2760 A.U.C is hereby extended to
pr. Kal. Ian.2760 (December 31, 2007)..

*****************************************************************

LEX GALERIA DE EDITORE COMMENTARIORUM

I. The editor commentariorum shall be appointed by a vote of the senate on
the nomination of a consul.

II. The editor commentariorum shall serve for three years.

III A deputy editor commentariorum shall also be appointed by a vote of
the senate on the nomination of a consul. The deputy will serve as the chief
assistant to the editor commentariorum. If during the three year term a
vacancy occurs the deputy editor commentariorum shall assume the duties for
remainder of that term as editor commentariorum.
*****************************************************************

LEX GALERIA DE PRIVATIS REBUS

I. The Lex Cornelia de privatis rebus is repealed.

II. The Lex Octavia de privatis rebus is repealed.

III. Confidential information consists of the following:

A. information given directly by a person for the purpose of applying for
citizenship; and
B. information given directly by a person for the purpose of updating or
correcting information referred to in III.A above; and
C. information obtained from the subscription list of the e-mail list that
currently constitutes the
Forum or main list of Nova Roma, other than information which is available
to every member of that e-mail list; and
D. information obtained from the subscription lists from the publications of
Nova Roma.

IV. Information is given directly when it is provided voluntarily by the
person to whom it pertains.

V. Where confidential information is held in official records or by any
magistrate, it shall be made available to any censor, consul, praetor,
magister aranearius, or magistrate legally responsible for the handling of
applications for citizenship, upon request by that person. It shall be made
available to any provincial governor, upon request by that governor, if and
only if it pertains to a person living in the province which he or she
governs. It shall not be made available to any other person except as
provided below.

VI. A censor may at his or her discretion give confidential information to a
magistrate other than one entitled to received it under V above upon request
by that magistrate.

VII. A magistrate who receives confidential information under V or VI above
may at his or her discretion give that information to his or her lawfully
appointed assistant.

VIII. A censor may at his or her discretion give confidential information on
request to a municipal agent of law enforcement or other person entitled by
municipal law to demand and be given the information. Where a censor
receives such a request, he or she shall inform the person to whom the
information pertains of the request, of all circumstances relevant to the
request, and of the censor's actions in response to the request.

IX. Other than as set out above, no person shall give to any other person
any confidential information about any third person without the permission
of that third person.

X. Nothing in this lex shall be taken to prohibit any person from asking any
other person for information about himself or herself. Nothing in this lex
shall be taken to prohibit any person from giving information about himself
to any other person.

*******************************************************************
LEX GALERIA DE CURSU HONORUM

In accordance with Article IV of the Constitution of Nova Roma, this
Lex Galeria de Cursu Honorum is enacted. It repeals but builds on the
Lex Vedia de Cursu Honorum, which serves as the foundations of the
Cursus Honorum within Nova Roma. The Lex Galeria de Cursu Honorum is
intended to bring Nova Roma even closer in line with the ancient Cursus
Honorum.

I. No individual may assume the office of Censor who has not completed
at least one of the following:

a. a full term as Consul.

b. at least six months as Consul suffectus.

II. No individual may assume the office of Consul who has not completed
at least one of the following:

a. a full term as Praetor.

b. at least six months as Praetor suffectus.

III. No individual may assume the office of Praetor who has not
completed a full term as either Aedilis Curulis , Tribunus Plebis or
Aedilis Plebis.

IV. No individual may assume the office of Aedilis Curulis, Tribunus
Plebis or Aedilis Plebis who has not completed a full term as Quaestor.

V. No individual may assume the office Quaestor who is not at least 21
years of age and been an assiduus (taxpaying) citizen of Nova Roma for
at least one year.

VI. Citizens who resign their positions prior to the normal end of
their term in office may not use that term to satisfy these
requirements, regardless of how much time they spent in office.

VII. Qualified citizens may run for office prior to the completion of
these requirements but must complete them prior to assuming office.

VIII Any magistrate who resigns from office with three months or less left
in their term will loose all century points for that office, an addition
twenty-five
century points and be bared from standing for office for two years.

IX. This law shall regulate only those individuals who assume any of
the aforementioned offices after 2 January, 2761 a.u.c. Any person
holding one of the aforementioned positions at the time of the passage
of this law or currently running for one of the regulated positions
shall be exempt from its provisions for the remainder of his or her
current term. The Lex Galeria de Cursu Honorum will apply to all
candidates standing for office after the elections of 2760 a.u.c.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52287 From: Stephen Gallagher Date: 2007-11-10
Subject: The Comitia Centuriata is called
The Comitia Centuriata is called

Ex offico Tiberius Galerius Paulinus

Censor and Augur Gaius Fabius Buteo Modianus has taken the auspices and the
augury was favorable. The Comitia Centuriata is convened to vote for the
ordinary Centuriate magistracies for calendar year 2761 auc.

The Contio will begin at 06:00 PM, Roma time (Central European Time), on 11
November and will last until 5:59 PM Roma time, on 12 November .( We have
already had a Contio that has lasted the required days.)

Voting will then commence according to this schedule:
06:00 PM, 12 November: Voting by all centuries starts. (Roma time)
05:59 PM, 18 November: Voting by all centuries ends. (Roma time)

The diribitores shall provide reports of the progress of the voting in
accordance with the provisions of the LEX FABIA DE RATIONE COMITIORUM
CENTURIATORUM.

The magistracies to be filled, and the candidates for these magistracies
are:
-----------

CENSOR (1 opening)

Tiberius Galerius Paulinus
Citizenship: 21 January 2002
http://www.novaroma.org/civitas/album?id=3443

Marca Hortensia Maior
Date of Citizenship: 20 May 2003
http://www.novaroma.org/civitas/album?id=5832

CONSUL (2 openings)

Titus Iulius Sabinus
Date of Citizenship: 18 October 2004
http://www.novaroma.org/civitas/album?id=8092

Marcus Moravius Piscinus Horatianus
Date of Citizenship1 Jun 2000
http://www.novaroma.org/civitas/album?id=432

********************************************

PRAETOR (2 openings)

Marcus Curiatius Complutensis
Date of Citizenship: 7 July 2003
http://www.novaroma.org/civitas/album?id=6159


Marcus Iulius Severus
Date of Citizenship: 16 March 2005
http://www.novaroma.org/civitas/album?id=8632

*****************************************
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52288 From: marcushoratius Date: 2007-11-10
Subject: a. d. III Eidus Novembris
M. Moravius Piscinus Horatianus Quiritibus et omnibus salutem
plurimam dicit: Diis bene iuvantibus simus.

Hodie est ante diem III Eidus Novembris; haec dies comitialis est:

AUC 697 / 56 BCE

Clodius Pulcher attacked M Tullius Cicero on the Via Sacra; Cicero
took shelter in the house of Tettius Damio.

AUC 547 / 206 BCE

"It is no wonder therefore if the indulgence of the Gods has
persisted, ever watchful to augment and protect an imperial power by
which even minor items of religious significance are seen to be
weighted with such scrupulous care: for never should our community be
thought to have averted its eyes from the most meticulous practice of
religious observances. In which community, when M. Marcellus, after
first taking Clastidium and then Syracusa, desired in his fifth
consulship to consecrate a temple to Honor and Virtus in due
discharge of vows taken, he was obstructed by the Collegium
Pontificum on the ground that a single sanctuary could not properly
be dedicated to two deities, arguing that if some prodigy were to
occur therein, it would be impossible to determine to which of the
two an expiatory ceremony should be performed and that it was not
customary to sacrifice a single victim to two deities at once, except
in certain recognized cases. The pontifical admonition resulted in
Marcellus placing images of Honor and Virtus in two different
shrines. Thus neither authority of so great a man weighed with the
Collegium Pontificum nor the additional expense with Marcellus so as
to interfere with due course and due observance rendered in matters
of religion." ~ Valerius Maximus 1.1.8

"Marcellus was detained by religious difficulties which one after
another presented themselves. In the war with the Gauls he had vowed
during the battle of Clastidium a temple to Honos and Virtus, but he
was prevented from dedicating it by the pontiffs. They said that one
shrine could not be lawfully dedicated to two deities, because in
case it were struck by lightning, or some other portent occurred in
it, there would be a difficulty about the expiation, since it could
not be known which deity was to be propitiated; one victim could not
be sacrificed to two deities except in the case of certain specified
deities. A second temple was hastily built to Virtus, but this was
not dedicated by Marcellus." ~ Livy 27.25.7-10

AUC 549 / 204 BCE

"In this year Marcellus dedicated the Temple of Virtus at the Porta
Capena; it was sixteen years since his father had first vowed it in
his first consulship at the Battle of Claustidium in Gaul." ~ Livy
29.11


Our thought for today is from Epictetus' Enchiridion 22

"If you have an earnest desire towards philosophy, prepare yourself
from the very first to have the multitude laugh and sneer, and
say, 'He is returned to us a philosopher all at once;' and 'Whence
this supercilious look?' Now, for your part, do not have a
supercilious look indeed; but keep steadily to those things which
appear best to you, as one appointed by God to this particular
station. For remember that, if you are persistent, those very persons
who at first ridiculed will afterwards admire you. But if you are
conquered by them, you will incur a double ridicule."
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52289 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2007-11-10
Subject: Re: The Comitia Populi Tributa is called
Salve Consul, et salvete quirites,

Ti. Galerius Paulinus <spqr753@...> writes:

> The Comitia Populi Tributa is called
[...]
> AEDILIS CURULIS (2 openings)
>
> Gnaeus Equitius Marinus
> Date of Citizenship: 23 May 2001
> http://www.novaroma.org/civitas/album?id=2356

Thank you for accepting my candidacy. My thanks also to the Tribunes
for allowing this exception since there are no other candidates. By
way of explanation to the quirites, I am offering my services to the
Republic because somebody has to do the job. I have twice been Curule
Aedile, I am familiar with the duties of the office and with the Magna
Mater project. I will ensure that things are done properly next year.

[...]

I don't think this following lex was in the previous comitia call.
I'm sure it has not been discussed in contio:

> LEX GALERIA DE CURSU HONORUM

I must object on principle to the introduction of a lex this late in
the process. With only a one-day contio period, nothing should be
added to the original comitia call except for candidates for
uncontested elections. There is simply not time for people to
adequately study this proposed lex and comment on it.

For the sake of those not familiar with the current law, this lex
makes these changes:

> I. No individual may assume the office of Censor who has not completed
> at least one of the following:
>
> a. a full term as Consul.
>
> b. at least six months as Consul suffectus.

Current law allows those who have served as Tribunes or Praetors to
stand for Censor. While I support this proposal in principle, and
would favor it being adopted, right now it is a back-door attempt to
block M. Hortensia Maior from being able to assume the office of
Censor if she should win the election. I object to this, and would
ask you all to defeat this proposal if Consul Paulinus insists on
leaving this proposal on the ballot.

> II. No individual may assume the office of Consul who has not completed
> at least one of the following:
>
> a. a full term as Praetor.
>
> b. at least six months as Praetor suffectus.

Current law allows those who have served as Curule Aedile or Tribune
to stand. While this proposal would codify the classical Cursus
Honorum from antiquity into our laws, it would also mean that a
current year's Praetors would have an inside track to Consul for next
year, since there's nothing in this proposal that would require people
to take a year off between magistracies. Since Nova Roma does not
have enough interested people to even fill all the magistracies in the
current election, I think it's reasonable to say we can not afford to
adopt this close an adherence to the practice of antiquity at this time.

> III. No individual may assume the office of Praetor who has not
> completed a full term as either Aedilis Curulis , Tribunus Plebis or
> Aedilis Plebis.

Currently a person who has served in any minor magistracy may stand
for Praetor.

> IV. No individual may assume the office of Aedilis Curulis, Tribunus
> Plebis or Aedilis Plebis who has not completed a full term as Quaestor.

Currently anyone may stand for these offices, without need to have
served as Quaestor.

[remainder snipped]

There are many good ideas in this proposal, and they deserve to be
examined fully in a proper contio. We don't have that right now, and
therefore I urge the Consul to withdraw this lex. If that does not
happen I ask you all to defeat this lex.

Valete,

CN-EQVIT-MARINVS
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52290 From: Stephen Gallagher Date: 2007-11-10
Subject: LEX GALERIA DE CURSU HONORUM
Salve Gnaeus Equitius Marinus

I note the point about the shorten Contio.
Citizens have until the 18th to vote.
I am sure that a number of posts will be made
on the merits or lack thereof of this proposed lex.

I was going to place it in the second election once
the first one was completed but that was cut short
because of some technical problems. So now we are
at the second go round. From now until the 18th of
November should be enough time to discuss it at length.

Vale

Ti. Galerius Paulinus



>From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus <gawne@...>
>Reply-To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
>To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
>Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] The Comitia Populi Tributa is called
>Date: Sat, 10 Nov 2007 23:32:57 -0500
>
>Salve Consul, et salvete quirites,
>
>Ti. Galerius Paulinus <spqr753@...> writes:
>
> > The Comitia Populi Tributa is called
>[...]
> > AEDILIS CURULIS (2 openings)
> >
> > Gnaeus Equitius Marinus
> > Date of Citizenship: 23 May 2001
> > http://www.novaroma.org/civitas/album?id=2356
>
>Thank you for accepting my candidacy. My thanks also to the Tribunes
>for allowing this exception since there are no other candidates. By
>way of explanation to the quirites, I am offering my services to the
>Republic because somebody has to do the job. I have twice been Curule
>Aedile, I am familiar with the duties of the office and with the Magna
>Mater project. I will ensure that things are done properly next year.
>
>[...]
>
>I don't think this following lex was in the previous comitia call.
>I'm sure it has not been discussed in contio:
>
> > LEX GALERIA DE CURSU HONORUM
>
>I must object on principle to the introduction of a lex this late in
>the process. With only a one-day contio period, nothing should be
>added to the original comitia call except for candidates for
>uncontested elections. There is simply not time for people to
>adequately study this proposed lex and comment on it.
>
>For the sake of those not familiar with the current law, this lex
>makes these changes:
>
> > I. No individual may assume the office of Censor who has not completed
> > at least one of the following:
> >
> > a. a full term as Consul.
> >
> > b. at least six months as Consul suffectus.
>
>Current law allows those who have served as Tribunes or Praetors to
>stand for Censor. While I support this proposal in principle, and
>would favor it being adopted, right now it is a back-door attempt to
>block M. Hortensia Maior from being able to assume the office of
>Censor if she should win the election. I object to this, and would
>ask you all to defeat this proposal if Consul Paulinus insists on
>leaving this proposal on the ballot.
>
> > II. No individual may assume the office of Consul who has not completed
> > at least one of the following:
> >
> > a. a full term as Praetor.
> >
> > b. at least six months as Praetor suffectus.
>
>Current law allows those who have served as Curule Aedile or Tribune
>to stand. While this proposal would codify the classical Cursus
>Honorum from antiquity into our laws, it would also mean that a
>current year's Praetors would have an inside track to Consul for next
>year, since there's nothing in this proposal that would require people
>to take a year off between magistracies. Since Nova Roma does not
>have enough interested people to even fill all the magistracies in the
>current election, I think it's reasonable to say we can not afford to
>adopt this close an adherence to the practice of antiquity at this time.
>
> > III. No individual may assume the office of Praetor who has not
> > completed a full term as either Aedilis Curulis , Tribunus Plebis or
> > Aedilis Plebis.
>
>Currently a person who has served in any minor magistracy may stand
>for Praetor.
>
> > IV. No individual may assume the office of Aedilis Curulis, Tribunus
> > Plebis or Aedilis Plebis who has not completed a full term as Quaestor.
>
>Currently anyone may stand for these offices, without need to have
>served as Quaestor.
>
>[remainder snipped]
>
>There are many good ideas in this proposal, and they deserve to be
>examined fully in a proper contio. We don't have that right now, and
>therefore I urge the Consul to withdraw this lex. If that does not
>happen I ask you all to defeat this lex.
>
>Valete,
>
>CN-EQVIT-MARINVS
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52291 From: M. Lucretius Agricola Date: 2007-11-11
Subject: Re: The Comitia Populi Tributa is called
Agricola Marino Omnibusque sal.

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Gnaeus Equitius Marinus <gawne@...>
wrote:
>
> Salve Consul, et salvete quirites,
>

[SNIP]

> > I. No individual may assume the office of Censor who has not completed
> > at least one of the following:
> >
> > a. a full term as Consul.
> >
> > b. at least six months as Consul suffectus.
>
> Current law allows those who have served as Tribunes or Praetors to
> stand for Censor. While I support this proposal in principle, and
> would favor it being adopted, right now it is a back-door attempt to
> block M. Hortensia Maior from being able to assume the office of
> Censor if she should win the election. I object to this, and would
> ask you all to defeat this proposal if Consul Paulinus insists on
> leaving this proposal on the ballot.
>

It does not block the candidacy of M. Hortensia Maior because of the
last part:

IX. This law shall regulate only those individuals who assume any of
the aforementioned offices after 2 January, 2761 a.u.c. Any person
holding one of the aforementioned positions at the time of the passage
of this law or currently running for one of the regulated positions
shall be exempt from its provisions for the remainder of his or her
current term. The Lex Galeria de Cursu Honorum will apply to all
candidates standing for office after the elections of 2760 a.u.c.

So this lex exempts all the candidates this year. It is the last part
of the lex, so it might have escaped notice.

optime vale, et valete

Agricola
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52292 From: C. Curius Saturninus Date: 2007-11-11
Subject: LUDI PLEBEII ART CONTEST!
Salvete,

Today we have Art Contest day in Ludi Plebeii. For the first time
that I can remember we have a video contribution, and winner for Art
Contest in Ludi.

The winner is L. Vitellius Triarius' video "Equorum Probatio -
Juppiter - Epulum Jovi". You can watch it at:
http://www.mydeo.com/videorequest.asp?XID=7477&CID=138980

Valete,

C. Curius Saturninus
(Mikko Sillanpää)

Senator - Aedilis Plebis - Propraetor Provinciae Thules
Rector Academia Thules ad Studia Romana Antiqua et Nova

e-mail: c.curius@...
www.academiathules.org
thule.novaroma.org




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52293 From: Svm Stoicus Date: 2007-11-11
Subject: my candidacy
Salvate Omnes !!!

I declare my candidacy for Curule Aediles.
Nova Roma needs new way. New view on our world.
I think that we must leave from our focus to the world!

I Sextus Lucilius Tutor, descendant of last defender of Constantinopolis,
I want run for office Curele Aediles. I am 30 years old, votary of stoic philosophy, owner classical library, admin czech forum about ancient Rome, poet and dreamer Old World Order - Rome.

When you give me your vote, believe me and I swear to Roman Gods that i will grasp strengthen Nova Roma.

Vale

Sextus Lucilius Tutor





[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52294 From: Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus Date: 2007-11-11
Subject: AGAINST the LEX GALERIA DE CURSU HONORUM - and a suggestion
Cn. Lentulus Quiritibus sal.

I encourage you to vote against this proposed lex.

Our current system of magistracies and of the Senate is based on an early republican model. This lex would introduce such regulated cursus honorum which did not exist that time. I think our model is finer without this new lex.

Furthermore: there are unhistorical elements in this lex, which is the other reason why I don't accept it.

I also object the 1 year requirement of NR membership before runnig for magistracies. If somebody would leave NR, he can leave after two years, too. What is the reason for requiring 1 year? Why not 2? Or why not six months, as it is currently? I support the current six months. It's enough time for a new enthusiast citizen to wait.

I personally would require something from provincial governors: it's a so much important office, and people before being involved in the central administration should not be allowed to govern a province!

I wrote a new proposal, based on Paulinus consul's lex. I encourage the consul to take this into consideration:

LEX GALERIA DE CURSU HONORUM - Modified Version


This lex repeals the lex Arminia de cursu honorum and the lex Vedia de cursu honorum.

I. No individual may assume the office of one of the Magistrates (not including the Apparitores) who has not been a registered citizen in good standing for at least six months.

II. No individual may assume the office of Consul, Praetor or Provincial Governor who has not previously completed at least six months of a term as one of the Magistrates (not including the Apparitores).

III. No individual may assume the office of Censor, who has not previously completed at least six months of a term as Consul or Praetor.

IV. Any individuals may run for office prior to completion of these requirements, but must complete it prior to actually assuming the office itself.

V. Individuals who resign their positions prior to the normal end of their term in office may not use that term to satisfy this requirement, regardless of how much time they spent in office.

VI. An exemption to this law may be granted to a person by the approval of the Senate. Such an exemption must be sought prior to the official start of the election in question, and must be granted in order to participate as a formal candidate in the election process. A failure to act on the question of an exemption shall not constitute a tacit approval of the exemption.

VII. This law shall regulate only those individuals who assume any
of the aforementioned offices after the 1st of January, 2761 a.u.c.



VALÉTE!






Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus,
R O G A T O R
------------------------------------------
Legatus Pro Praetore Provinciae Pannoniae
Sacerdos Provinciae Pannoniae
Accensus Consulis Ti. Galerii Paulini
Scriba Praetricis A. Tulliae Scholasticae
Scriba Aedilis Curulis Iuliae Caesaris Cytheridis Aeges
Scriba Interpretis Linguae Latinae A. Tulliae Scholasticae
-------------------------------------------
Decurio I. Sodalitatis Latinitatis
Dominus Factionis Russatae
Latinista, Classicus Philologus


---------------------------------

---------------------------------
L'email della prossima generazione? Puoi averla con la nuova Yahoo! Mail

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52295 From: L. Vitellius Triarius Date: 2007-11-11
Subject: Re: Any more candidates? Fabius Maximus -Quaestor
Salve Maxime,

Good to have you on board!

Vale,
Triarius

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, QFabiusMaxmi@... wrote:
>
>
> In a message dated 11/10/2007 12:26:34 PM Pacific Standard Time,
> spqr753@... writes:
>
> QUAESTOR
>
> I'll stand for Quaestor. With the current strike, it'll be good to
get back
> into Nova Roma government.
>
> I have been at Nova Roma since Aug 1998. I have held all major
Magistrices
> except Censor, and I am well versed in Roman History and Poltical
Systems. I
> have written many a monograph on the subject. Have a state of the
art PC, with
> a dedicated T-1 line.
>
> I am more then qualified to stand for Quaestor.
>
> Q. Fabius Maximus
>
>
>
> ************************************** See what's new at
http://www.aol.com
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52296 From: L. Vitellius Triarius Date: 2007-11-11
Subject: Re: AGAINST the LEX GALERIA DE CURSU HONORUM - and a suggestion
--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus
<cn_corn_lent@...> wrote:
>
> I personally would require something from provincial governors: it's
a so much important office, and people before being involved in the
central administration should not be allowed to govern a province!

Hence, the title of PRO-praetor!

Valete,
Triarius
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52297 From: Stephen Gallagher Date: 2007-11-11
Subject: FOR the LEX GALERIA DE CURSU HONORUM
Salve Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus

As much as you and I have agreed in the past and will so again I believe it
is time to put some teeth into our system of electing our magistrates. In
all the time I have been here it has been repeatedly said that Nova Roma is
based on the middle republican model. In fact our declaration states that

� Nova Roma is an organization dedicated to the study and restoration of
ancient Roman culture. From its legendary founding in 753 BCE to 330 CE��

So it would seem that we can use anything that makes us better from the age
of the Kings to the last centuries or so of the age of Emperors.

Asking that a new citizen look around for a year to see what is going on,
volunteer their services to a sitting magistrate and then stand for office
does not strike me as over burdensome.

This lex requires that you be here for one year, that you be at least 21
years of age and that you stand for Quaestor as your first stop along the
path leading to the Consulship and beyond.

I do not think it too much to ask.

First Quaestor then either Aedilis Curulis, Tribunus
Plebis or Aedilis Plebis then Praetor then Consul and then Censor
Is that too much to ask? I don�t think it is.

I ask you to enact the LEX GALERIA DE CURSU HONORUM
as written.

Valete

Ti. Galerius Paulinus
Consul


>From: Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus <cn_corn_lent@...>
>Reply-To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
>To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
>Subject: [Nova-Roma] AGAINST the LEX GALERIA DE CURSU HONORUM - and a
>suggestion
>Date: Sun, 11 Nov 2007 11:42:05 +0100 (CET)
>
>Cn. Lentulus Quiritibus sal.
>
>I encourage you to vote against this proposed lex.
>
>Our current system of magistracies and of the Senate is based on an early
>republican model. This lex would introduce such regulated cursus honorum
>which did not exist that time. I think our model is finer without this new
>lex.
>
>Furthermore: there are unhistorical elements in this lex, which is the
>other reason why I don't accept it.
>
>I also object the 1 year requirement of NR membership before runnig for
>magistracies. If somebody would leave NR, he can leave after two years,
>too. What is the reason for requiring 1 year? Why not 2? Or why not six
>months, as it is currently? I support the current six months. It's enough
>time for a new enthusiast citizen to wait.
>
>I personally would require something from provincial governors: it's a so
>much important office, and people before being involved in the central
>administration should not be allowed to govern a province!
>
>I wrote a new proposal, based on Paulinus consul's lex. I encourage the
>consul to take this into consideration:
>
>LEX GALERIA DE CURSU HONORUM - Modified Version
>
>
> This lex repeals the lex Arminia de cursu honorum and the lex Vedia de
>cursu honorum.
>
> I. No individual may assume the office of one of the Magistrates (not
>including the Apparitores) who has not been a registered citizen in good
>standing for at least six months.
>
> II. No individual may assume the office of Consul, Praetor or Provincial
>Governor who has not previously completed at least six months of a term as
>one of the Magistrates (not including the Apparitores).
>
> III. No individual may assume the office of Censor, who has not
>previously completed at least six months of a term as Consul or Praetor.
>
> IV. Any individuals may run for office prior to completion of these
>requirements, but must complete it prior to actually assuming the office
>itself.
>
> V. Individuals who resign their positions prior to the normal end of
>their term in office may not use that term to satisfy this requirement,
>regardless of how much time they spent in office.
>
> VI. An exemption to this law may be granted to a person by the approval
>of the Senate. Such an exemption must be sought prior to the official start
>of the election in question, and must be granted in order to participate as
>a formal candidate in the election process. A failure to act on the
>question of an exemption shall not constitute a tacit approval of the
>exemption.
>
> VII. This law shall regulate only those individuals who assume any
>of the aforementioned offices after the 1st of January, 2761 a.u.c.
>
>
>
>VAL�TE!
>
>
>
>
>
>
>Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus,
>R O G A T O R
>------------------------------------------
>Legatus Pro Praetore Provinciae Pannoniae
>Sacerdos Provinciae Pannoniae
>Accensus Consulis Ti. Galerii Paulini
>Scriba Praetricis A. Tulliae Scholasticae
>Scriba Aedilis Curulis Iuliae Caesaris Cytheridis Aeges
>Scriba Interpretis Linguae Latinae A. Tulliae Scholasticae
>-------------------------------------------
>Decurio I. Sodalitatis Latinitatis
>Dominus Factionis Russatae
>Latinista, Classicus Philologus
>
>
>---------------------------------
>
>---------------------------------
>L'email della prossima generazione? Puoi averla con la nuova Yahoo! Mail
>
>[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52298 From: A. Apollonius Cordus Date: 2007-11-11
Subject: Re: Questions for the non candidates
A. Apollonius L. Rutilio sal.

Apologies for my late reply.

> This election campaign is surprisingly dull. So, I would like ask a
> few questions to non-candidates:
>
> What NR will be in ten years, in your opinion?
>
> Have you ever considered a personal action for a long-term goal ?

Very interesting questions. What do I think Nova Roma will be in ten years?

I honestly don't know. And that's difficult for me to admit, especially since it promises to disappoint the prominent senator who said about me not long ago, "Not since Sinicius Drusus have I seen such political foresight". (As you can imagine, I had a good chuckle when I read that!) But I really don't know what Nova Roma will be in ten years.

I have some fears and some hopes. My principal fear is that Nova Roma will be a community whose members make no real effort to live by the customs of the old republic. I see this happening far too much even now. Many people, including many of our leaders, go from day to day and week to week in Nova Roma reacting to this small problem and that small problem and forget completely what Nova Roma is all about. It is about restoring and sustaining Romanitas. And yet people routinely try to solve the day-to-day problems of Nova Roma not by doing what Romans would do but by doing whatever pops into their heads. Sometimes these solutions work, and sometimes they don't. But doing whatever pops into your head, even if it happens to solve today's minor problem, is not the way to restore and sustain Romanitas. In fact, unless you are already so deeply Romanized that whatever pops into your head is exactly what would pop into the head of Scipio or Cicero, it
is exactly the way to prevent Romanitas being restored and sustained. And if that's what we're doing, then there is no point solving these everyday problems. It's like rearranging the deck-chairs on the Titanic.

But that's all rather depressing. I'll tell you about my hopes. I hope that in ten years Nova Roma will be a community of people living recognizably Roman lives, or at least making genuine and well-informed efforts to do so. I hope that much, if not all, of our daily business will be done in Latin. I hope that we will have been able to get rid of all these badly-written leges (including the ones I've written myself) which try to force us to behave in a vaguely Roman way: I hope we won't need them because we will have easy access to reliable information about how the Romans governed themselves and will choose to govern ourselves that way without needing to be ordered to do so. I hope that our website will be the internet's single best resource on the Roman republic. I hope that many of us will live together in physical communities so that we can see each other frequently and bring Romanitas into our daily lives in simply ways like greeting each
other in Latin when we pass on the street or going to Roman dinner-parties where we recline on dining-couches, eat lagana, and speculate about who killed M. Drusus or whether L. Poplicola invented the consulate. I hope that when people want to know what the Roman republic would be like if it existed in the modern world, they will be able to look at us and say, "yes, that is clearly how it would be".

Have I ever considered personal action to achieve a long-term goal? Yes, I have considered a few things and even done a few things. I have tried telling people off when they behave in ways which are un-Roman or which harm our efforts to restore and sustain Romanitas. Sometimes it works, but more often it just annoys people. An awful lot of people find me quite annoying. I don't know whether that's because I really am annoying or because a lot of people here behave in un-Roman ways and don't like being told that they're doing it. Neither option is very appealing. I'm also trying to be more constructive by informing people about what *is* the Roman way to behave. This is probably more productive in the long run, though it's also harder work. In particular I'm making slow but steady contributions to our website, with the goal of helping it to become a comprehensive source of information on Roman republican history and culture, with lots of
information and, equally importantly, with lots of footnotes which will allow people to do their own research and make up their own minds. And I'm also trying to follow the advice of that great Roman philosopher Mohandas Ghandi (!), "be the change you want to see". I speak Latin - not very well, but well enough to have a conversation - and I meet up frequently with fellow Romans in London to talk, eat, play games, and have fun in a Roman way. And, most importantly, when I have to make a decision I try to think about what Roman republicans, especially the ones I admire, would have done.

I hope that's the sort of answer you wanted!



___________________________________________________________
Want ideas for reducing your carbon footprint? Visit Yahoo! For Good http://uk.promotions.yahoo.com/forgood/environment.html
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52299 From: A. Apollonius Cordus Date: 2007-11-11
Subject: De Smith (ERAT: auspices)
A. Apollonius Cn. Equitio sal.

> You should note that Smith's Dictionary was written in the 1870s, and
> some of what was the best scholarship at the time has since been
> improved upon. But it is the best single source of information about
> Roma Antiqua available.

I think it's very important to add the words "... on the internet" to the end of that last sentence. Very, very important.



___________________________________________________________
Want ideas for reducing your carbon footprint? Visit Yahoo! For Good http://uk.promotions.yahoo.com/forgood/environment.html
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52300 From: M·CVR·COMPLVTENSIS Date: 2007-11-11
Subject: Re: The Comitia Populi Tributa is called
Salve Marine etr salvete omnes

the Tribunes have not yet spoken on this subject.

Valete

M·CVRIATIVS·COMPLVTENSIS
TRIBVNVS PLEBIS
PROPRAETOR HISPANIAE
SCRIBA CENSORIS CFBM
NOVA ROMA

-------------------------------------------

ex paucis multa, ex minimis maxima

----- Original Message -----
From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Sunday, November 11, 2007 5:32 AM
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] The Comitia Populi Tributa is called


Salve Consul, et salvete quirites,

Ti. Galerius Paulinus <spqr753@...> writes:

> The Comitia Populi Tributa is called
[...]
> AEDILIS CURULIS (2 openings)
>
> Gnaeus Equitius Marinus
> Date of Citizenship: 23 May 2001
> http://www.novaroma.org/civitas/album?id=2356

Thank you for accepting my candidacy. My thanks also to the Tribunes
for allowing this exception since there are no other candidates. By
way of explanation to the quirites, I am offering my services to the
Republic because somebody has to do the job. I have twice been Curule
Aedile, I am familiar with the duties of the office and with the Magna
Mater project. I will ensure that things are done properly next year.

[...]

I don't think this following lex was in the previous comitia call.
I'm sure it has not been discussed in contio:

> LEX GALERIA DE CURSU HONORUM

I must object on principle to the introduction of a lex this late in
the process. With only a one-day contio period, nothing should be
added to the original comitia call except for candidates for
uncontested elections. There is simply not time for people to
adequately study this proposed lex and comment on it.

For the sake of those not familiar with the current law, this lex
makes these changes:

> I. No individual may assume the office of Censor who has not completed
> at least one of the following:
>
> a. a full term as Consul.
>
> b. at least six months as Consul suffectus.

Current law allows those who have served as Tribunes or Praetors to
stand for Censor. While I support this proposal in principle, and
would favor it being adopted, right now it is a back-door attempt to
block M. Hortensia Maior from being able to assume the office of
Censor if she should win the election. I object to this, and would
ask you all to defeat this proposal if Consul Paulinus insists on
leaving this proposal on the ballot.

> II. No individual may assume the office of Consul who has not completed
> at least one of the following:
>
> a. a full term as Praetor.
>
> b. at least six months as Praetor suffectus.

Current law allows those who have served as Curule Aedile or Tribune
to stand. While this proposal would codify the classical Cursus
Honorum from antiquity into our laws, it would also mean that a
current year's Praetors would have an inside track to Consul for next
year, since there's nothing in this proposal that would require people
to take a year off between magistracies. Since Nova Roma does not
have enough interested people to even fill all the magistracies in the
current election, I think it's reasonable to say we can not afford to
adopt this close an adherence to the practice of antiquity at this time.

> III. No individual may assume the office of Praetor who has not
> completed a full term as either Aedilis Curulis , Tribunus Plebis or
> Aedilis Plebis.

Currently a person who has served in any minor magistracy may stand
for Praetor.

> IV. No individual may assume the office of Aedilis Curulis, Tribunus
> Plebis or Aedilis Plebis who has not completed a full term as Quaestor.

Currently anyone may stand for these offices, without need to have
served as Quaestor.

[remainder snipped]

There are many good ideas in this proposal, and they deserve to be
examined fully in a proper contio. We don't have that right now, and
therefore I urge the Consul to withdraw this lex. If that does not
happen I ask you all to defeat this lex.

Valete,

CN-EQVIT-MARINVS




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52301 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2007-11-11
Subject: Re: The Comitia Populi Tributa is called
Salve Complutensi,

M·CVR·COMPLVTENSIS <complutensis@...> writes:

> Salve Marine etr salvete omnes
>
> the Tribunes have not yet spoken on this subject.

Then I shall await their decision. I had asked the Consul to obtain
tribunician agreement to this idea. As I'm sure you know, it requires
a waiver of the provisions of the Lex Salicia de Continuatio et
Cumulatio.

Vale,

CN-EQVIT-MARINVS
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52302 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2007-11-11
Subject: Conditional Declaration for Curule Aedile
Salvete quirites,

As the more perceptive among you have noticed, Consul Paulinus has
placed my name on the revised ballot for Curule Aedile. This resulted
from a private note I sent to him yesterday, offering to stand for
this important office that was going vacant. However, I have not yet
posted an official declaration.

This post is the declaration. I am standing for Curule Aedile on the
condition that the consul is willing to waive the requirements of the
Lex Salicia de Continuatione et Cumulatione and the Tribunes agree to
this waiver.

I have twice before served as Curule Aedile. I have also served in a
number of Aedilician cohorts, beginning with that of Caeso Fabius
Buteo Quintilianus, and continuing through the present. I know what
needs to be done, and I know how to do it. I have participated in the
Magna Mater Project for many years now, and I will insure that it is
properly managed next year.

The reason this is a conditional declaration is because it is subject
to the approval of both the presiding magistrate, Consul Paulinus, and
the approval of the Tribunes since they are the guardians of Nova
Roma's constitution.

Valete,

CN-EQVIT-MARINVS
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52303 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2007-11-11
Subject: Re: my candidacy
Salve Sexte Lucili,

I welcome your candidacy and hope the Consul will accept it. It would
very neatly solve a number of problems, and I would be quite happy to
step aside and leave things to you.

Vale,

CN-EQVIT-MARINVS

Sextus Lucilius Tutor <phorus@...> writes:

> Salvate Omnes !!!
>
> I declare my candidacy for Curule Aediles.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52304 From: Stephen Gallagher Date: 2007-11-11
Subject: Candidacy for Curule Aediles
Salvete Gnaeus Equitius Marinus et Sextus Lucilius Tutor

I have excepted both of your candidacies.

Gnaeus Equitius Marinus is it your wish not to
stand because we now have two other candidates?

Valete

Tiberius Galerius Paulinus
Consul



>From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus <gawne@...>
>Reply-To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
>To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
>Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] my candidacy
>Date: Sun, 11 Nov 2007 09:55:04 -0500
>
>Salve Sexte Lucili,
>
>I welcome your candidacy and hope the Consul will accept it. It would
>very neatly solve a number of problems, and I would be quite happy to
>step aside and leave things to you.
>
>Vale,
>
>CN-EQVIT-MARINVS
>
>Sextus Lucilius Tutor <phorus@...> writes:
>
> > Salvate Omnes !!!
> >
> > I declare my candidacy for Curule Aediles.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52305 From: marcushoratius Date: 2007-11-11
Subject: Re: AGAINST the LEX GALERIA DE CURSU HONORUM - and a suggestion
M Moravius Piscinus Quiritibus SPD:

I, too, oppose the Consul's proposed lex. It seems that we see such
measures crop up over and over again. The only purpose served by
these is to restrict offices to the same people, whether they are
good or inept. At the same time they inhibit Nova Roma from taking
full advantage of the talents and experience of new Citizens.

Gnaius Lentulus is correct. The cursus honorum is a myth. It is
ahistorical. Time and again Livy tells us stories of those who were
elected Consul before holding any other office. There is a simple
reason behind all of the examples that could be offered to show just
how Galerius' proposal is so against historical precedent.

When the tribunes, in 199 BCE, vetoed T. Quinctius Flamininus from
standing for Consul immediately after his quaestorship, the issue was
debated in the Comitia Centuriata and referred to the Senate.

"The Fathers voted that it seemed proper that the right should reside
with the People to elect anyone they chose who sought the office and
for which it was not expressly forbidden to hold. The tibunes
yielded to the will of the Senate." ~ Livy 32.7.

Our Citizens are perfectly capable of deciding for themselves whether
a person is able to serve in an office without mandating a rigid
progression through a series of offices in an ahistorical maanner. It
is talent we wish elected to office, not those who make false claim
to dignitas through the number of titles they collect.

Valete et vadete in pace Deorum

Quanto plus est ingenii Romani terminus in tantum promovisse quam
imperii.

"How much greater it is and more glorious to have advanced the
frontiers of the Roman genius, than those of the Roman empire!" ~
Plinius Secundus, Historia Naturalis 7.51


--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus
<cn_corn_lent@...> wrote:
>
> Cn. Lentulus Quiritibus sal.
>
> I encourage you to vote against this proposed lex.
>
> Our current system of magistracies and of the Senate is based on an
early republican model. This lex would introduce such regulated
cursus honorum which did not exist that time. I think our model is
finer without this new lex.
>
> Furthermore: there are unhistorical elements in this lex, which is
the other reason why I don't accept it.
>
> I also object the 1 year requirement of NR membership before runnig
for magistracies. If somebody would leave NR, he can leave after two
years, too. What is the reason for requiring 1 year? Why not 2? Or
why not six months, as it is currently? I support the current six
months. It's enough time for a new enthusiast citizen to wait.
>
> I personally would require something from provincial governors:
it's a so much important office, and people before being involved in
the central administration should not be allowed to govern a province!
>
> I wrote a new proposal, based on Paulinus consul's lex. I encourage
the consul to take this into consideration:
>
> LEX GALERIA DE CURSU HONORUM - Modified Version
>
>
> This lex repeals the lex Arminia de cursu honorum and the lex
Vedia de cursu honorum.
>
> I. No individual may assume the office of one of the Magistrates
(not including the Apparitores) who has not been a registered citizen
in good standing for at least six months.
>
> II. No individual may assume the office of Consul, Praetor or
Provincial Governor who has not previously completed at least six
months of a term as one of the Magistrates (not including the
Apparitores).
>
> III. No individual may assume the office of Censor, who has not
previously completed at least six months of a term as Consul or
Praetor.
>
> IV. Any individuals may run for office prior to completion of
these requirements, but must complete it prior to actually assuming
the office itself.
>
> V. Individuals who resign their positions prior to the normal end
of their term in office may not use that term to satisfy this
requirement, regardless of how much time they spent in office.
>
> VI. An exemption to this law may be granted to a person by the
approval of the Senate. Such an exemption must be sought prior to the
official start of the election in question, and must be granted in
order to participate as a formal candidate in the election process. A
failure to act on the question of an exemption shall not constitute a
tacit approval of the exemption.
>
> VII. This law shall regulate only those individuals who assume
any
> of the aforementioned offices after the 1st of January, 2761 a.u.c.
>
>
>
> VALÉTE!
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus,
> R O G A T O R
> ------------------------------------------
> Legatus Pro Praetore Provinciae Pannoniae
> Sacerdos Provinciae Pannoniae
> Accensus Consulis Ti. Galerii Paulini
> Scriba Praetricis A. Tulliae Scholasticae
> Scriba Aedilis Curulis Iuliae Caesaris Cytheridis Aeges
> Scriba Interpretis Linguae Latinae A. Tulliae Scholasticae
> -------------------------------------------
> Decurio I. Sodalitatis Latinitatis
> Dominus Factionis Russatae
> Latinista, Classicus Philologus
>
>
> ---------------------------------
>
> ---------------------------------
> L'email della prossima generazione? Puoi averla con la nuova Yahoo!
Mail
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52306 From: Pompeia Minucia Strabo Date: 2007-11-11
Subject: Voting Still...in the Canceled Elections
Salvete Omnes Novae Romae:

I am still entertaining votes in the cista which apply to the former Comitia Centuriata and Comitia Populi Tributa elections.

Please be advised that these are not valid votes...these elections were canceled by Tiberius Galerus Paulinus Consul on Nov. 9. For those who have voted this morning, you are likely wondering why the candidate lists are not accurate....well, this is why.

The only votes I should be receiving are those of the Comitia Plebis Tributa.

Please refer to the announcements of the Consul, present and forthcoming, regarding the new comitia calls and voting schedules.

Valete
Po. Minucia Strabo
Custos

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52307 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2007-11-11
Subject: Re: Candidacy for Curule Aediles
Salve Consul,

Ti. Galerius Paulinus <spqr753@...> writes:

> Gnaeus Equitius Marinus is it your wish not to
> stand because we now have two other candidates?

Yes, that is correct. As we discussed privately, I'd still be willing
to stand for one of the open Quaestor spots, provided the Tribunes
were to agree to the required waiver of the Lex Salicia de Continuatio
et Cumulatio.

Vale,

CN-EQVIT-MARINVS
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52308 From: marcushoratius Date: 2007-11-11
Subject: Re: my candidacy
Salvete bene Sexte Lucili, Luci Salix, et Q. Fabi

I welcome and thank you each for coming forward to offer your
candidacies for Aedilis Curulis and Quaestores. It is important to
and a good sign of the vitality of our civitas that fresh candidates
like you Sexte Lucili and Luci Salix Cicero step forward. And it
also good to see some of our earlier Citizens like Fabius Maximus and
Venator continuing to take minor magistracies to support Nova Roma
with their experience.

Bonam habete Fortunam! Vadete in pace Deorum.

M Moravius Piscinus Horatianus

Sapimus animo, fruimur anima; sine animo anima est debilis. ~ L.
Accius, Ex Epigonis 15



--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Svm Stoicus" <phorus@...> wrote:
>
> Salvate Omnes !!!
>
> I declare my candidacy for Curule Aediles.
> Nova Roma needs new way. New view on our world.
> I think that we must leave from our focus to the world!
>
> I Sextus Lucilius Tutor, descendant of last defender of
Constantinopolis,
> I want run for office Curele Aediles. I am 30 years old, votary of
stoic philosophy, owner classical library, admin czech forum about
ancient Rome, poet and dreamer Old World Order - Rome.
>
> When you give me your vote, believe me and I swear to Roman Gods
that i will grasp strengthen Nova Roma.
>
> Vale
>
> Sextus Lucilius Tutor
>
>
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52309 From: PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@aol.com Date: 2007-11-11
Subject: Re: Custos Announcement - Century Praerogativa Privilege Expired
Fl. Galerius Aurelianus Po Minucia Strabo sal.

I assure you that at least one of the three members of Century II voted
prior to the posting of your notice. I hope that my two fellows also voted.

Vale.



************************************** See what's new at http://www.aol.com


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52310 From: Stephen Gallagher Date: 2007-11-11
Subject: The Cursus Honorum is not a myth
Salvete Nova Romans

The Cursus Honorum is not a myth.

Those who have choose not to follow it can come up with
any reason for not having done so.

As I have said before in ancient Rome a person would start
with a military component of his civic career and because
we do not have that component we in Nova Roma need
to do somethings a little different.

In ancient Rome one could be a military tribune at twenty
but could not stand for election as Quaestor until you were
thirty years of age. In order to stand for Aedile or Tribune you
had to be thirty-seven years of age, Praetor you needed to be
forty and forty-three for Consul. If what I propose is so out of
whack with Roman tradition why is this posted on our Wiki Site

�Cursus honorum is the Latin term for the standard political career.
A cursus is literally a race, or a race-track; honores are
'honours' or 'offices'.

Political offices were traditionally held in a certain order.

This system developed over the first centuries of the republic and
was for a long time purely customary,

though it was gradually codified in law.

The original cursus contained only four offices:
quaestor, praetor, consul, and censor.
They were almost always held in that order,

and by the middle republic it was rare for any stage to be omitted.

These continued to be the only offices which were part of the technical
cursus,
but it also became common for other offices to be held in addition:
aedilis plebis, aedilis curulis, and tribunus plebis.

A Roman would usually hold at least one of these offices,
usually after being quaestor and before being praetor,
but sometimes before being quaestor.

One might also include the lowest elected offices such as the
vigintisexviri as part of the cursus in its broad sense.
It was usual to leave at least a year between one office and the next.�

Retrieved from "http://www.novaroma.org/nr/Cursus_honorum_%28Nova_Roma%29"

Valete

Ti. Galerius Paulinus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52311 From: Jorge Lescano Date: 2007-11-11
Subject: Candidacy for Quaestor
Regards Fellow Citizens,

I, Tiberius Cornelius Scipio, do step forward and present my candidacy
for Quaestor. This is an opportunity for me to serve Nova Roma, and to
become move involved with our collective efforts. If elected, I
promise to be diligent, responsible and cooperative.

TCS+
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52312 From: PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@aol.com Date: 2007-11-11
Subject: Re: EDICTUM CONSULARE XXIII-MMDCCLX A.U.C: Intercession by FGA
Fl. Galerius Aurelianus Tribunus Plebis S.P.D.

I hereby pronounce intercessio against the Edictum Consulare XXIII issued by
Tb. Galerius Paulinus. I do not believe that there is a legal precedent
that allows a consul to void an election due to the oversights, negligence, or
malfeasance of a censor.

I have been away from my computer since Friday afternoon and only discovered
this edictum a few minutes ago. While I would normally call on my
colleagues to discuss the issue, I cannot wait that long. If the Consul can supply
information allowing for the voiding of the election, I am willing to discuss
it and perhaps withdraw my intercessio.

Valete.



************************************** See what's new at http://www.aol.com


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52313 From: Lucius Rutilius Minervalis Date: 2007-11-11
Subject: Re: Questions for the non candidates
Salve Corde,

Thanks for your interesting response.

I think you have admirably summed up our present and future
difficulties. Your expectations should be our goals!

We all know your energy ;) And it is certain that if everyone acted
like you in daily life, Roman culture and civilization would not be
today, as I deplore, a distant and unreal memory, ready to die.

Vale,

Lucius Rutilius Minervalis
Celticae Legatus

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "A. Apollonius Cordus"
<a_apollonius_cordus@...> wrote:
>
> A. Apollonius L. Rutilio sal.
>
> Apologies for my late reply.
>
> > This election campaign is surprisingly dull. So, I would like ask a
> > few questions to non-candidates:
> >
> > What NR will be in ten years, in your opinion?
> >
> > Have you ever considered a personal action for a long-term goal ?
>
> Very interesting questions. What do I think Nova Roma will be in
ten years?
>
> I honestly don't know. And that's difficult for me to admit,
especially since it promises to disappoint the prominent senator who
said about me not long ago, "Not since Sinicius Drusus have I seen
such political foresight". (As you can imagine, I had a good chuckle
when I read that!) But I really don't know what Nova Roma will be in
ten years.
>
> I have some fears and some hopes. My principal fear is that Nova
Roma will be a community whose members make no real effort to live by
the customs of the old republic. I see this happening far too much
even now. Many people, including many of our leaders, go from day to
day and week to week in Nova Roma reacting to this small problem and
that small problem and forget completely what Nova Roma is all about.
It is about restoring and sustaining Romanitas. And yet people
routinely try to solve the day-to-day problems of Nova Roma not by
doing what Romans would do but by doing whatever pops into their
heads. Sometimes these solutions work, and sometimes they don't. But
doing whatever pops into your head, even if it happens to solve
today's minor problem, is not the way to restore and sustain
Romanitas. In fact, unless you are already so deeply Romanized that
whatever pops into your head is exactly what would pop into the head
of Scipio or Cicero, it
> is exactly the way to prevent Romanitas being restored and
sustained. And if that's what we're doing, then there is no point
solving these everyday problems. It's like rearranging the
deck-chairs on the Titanic.
>
> But that's all rather depressing. I'll tell you about my hopes. I
hope that in ten years Nova Roma will be a community of people living
recognizably Roman lives, or at least making genuine and well-informed
efforts to do so. I hope that much, if not all, of our daily business
will be done in Latin. I hope that we will have been able to get rid
of all these badly-written leges (including the ones I've written
myself) which try to force us to behave in a vaguely Roman way: I hope
we won't need them because we will have easy access to reliable
information about how the Romans governed themselves and will choose
to govern ourselves that way without needing to be ordered to do so.
I hope that our website will be the internet's single best resource on
the Roman republic. I hope that many of us will live together in
physical communities so that we can see each other frequently and
bring Romanitas into our daily lives in simply ways like greeting each
> other in Latin when we pass on the street or going to Roman
dinner-parties where we recline on dining-couches, eat lagana, and
speculate about who killed M. Drusus or whether L. Poplicola invented
the consulate. I hope that when people want to know what the Roman
republic would be like if it existed in the modern world, they will be
able to look at us and say, "yes, that is clearly how it would be".
>
> Have I ever considered personal action to achieve a long-term goal?
Yes, I have considered a few things and even done a few things. I
have tried telling people off when they behave in ways which are
un-Roman or which harm our efforts to restore and sustain Romanitas.
Sometimes it works, but more often it just annoys people. An awful
lot of people find me quite annoying. I don't know whether that's
because I really am annoying or because a lot of people here behave in
un-Roman ways and don't like being told that they're doing it.
Neither option is very appealing. I'm also trying to be more
constructive by informing people about what *is* the Roman way to
behave. This is probably more productive in the long run, though it's
also harder work. In particular I'm making slow but steady
contributions to our website, with the goal of helping it to become a
comprehensive source of information on Roman republican history and
culture, with lots of
> information and, equally importantly, with lots of footnotes which
will allow people to do their own research and make up their own
minds. And I'm also trying to follow the advice of that great Roman
philosopher Mohandas Ghandi (!), "be the change you want to see". I
speak Latin - not very well, but well enough to have a conversation -
and I meet up frequently with fellow Romans in London to talk, eat,
play games, and have fun in a Roman way. And, most importantly, when
I have to make a decision I try to think about what Roman republicans,
especially the ones I admire, would have done.
>
> I hope that's the sort of answer you wanted!
>
>
>
> ___________________________________________________________
> Want ideas for reducing your carbon footprint? Visit Yahoo! For Good
http://uk.promotions.yahoo.com/forgood/environment.html
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52314 From: M·CVR·COMPLVTENSIS Date: 2007-11-11
Subject: Re: The Comitia Populi Tributa is called
Marcus Curiatius Complutensis omnes civibus Novae Romae S·P·D·

Ex officio Tribuni Plebis

Salvete

Now it seems we have much in a hurry to finish the elections. After the problems with the centuries I would have preferred a little more calm ......and scheduling the election respecting the intercessio period......

Recently I declared invalidad the candidacy of one of my colleagues who wished to stand for the same office.

Now my friend Marinus, against the Lex Salicia de Continuatio et Cumulatio, asked us, the Tribunes, to make an exception and allow him an accumulation of charges before term forecast (Dec 15).

Seems that I am the only Tribune who is working, because I have asked the opinion of my colleagues without reply.

In these circumstances I cannot accept the second candidacy of Equitius Marinus and I ask him to wait the term fixed by law.

All this knowing that Equitius Marinus is a very skilled and probably the most suitable candidate to fill these two positions simultaneously, but the law is the law.

Now I want make a declaration: we the Tribunes were consulted and required to make an exception to the law, but at no time did we declare for or against.

The Consul Galerius Paulinus has committed a serie of faults:

1 .- put in the mouth of the tribunes words ever uttered
2 .- declare valid an candidacy declaration which had not been published by the candidate in the ML according to the consular edict.
3.- declare valid an candidacy declaration that he knew was not valid
4.- call the Comitia without respecting the intercessio period.

I do not want to outlaw these elections, therefore I cannot support the veto of my colleague Galerius Aurelianus but I want ask the Consul to refrain from committing further irregularities.

Valete

M·CVRIATIVS·COMPLVTENSIS
TRIBVNVS PLEBIS
NOVA ROMA

-------------------------------------------

ex paucis multa, ex minimis maxima













[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52315 From: marcushoratius Date: 2007-11-11
Subject: Re: The Cursus Honorum is a myth
Salve Consul Ti.Galeri

Age limitations were not instituted at all before 180 BCE, and the
particular ones you pointed to are even later. Marcus Valerius Corvus
was 23 years old when elected Consul for the first time.

There was no prerequites for a candidate to have held one office prior
to seeking another under the Respublica Libera. You're proposal is not
historical. That makes the very idea of there having been a cursus
honorum into a myth.

In Nova Roma's past people have proposed excluding one group of
Citizens or another from office because of age or because of their sex
or their religious beliefs or language, or whatever. Time and again
your proposal comes up, too. We do not need to set limitations on who
is willing to participate in Nova Roma's affairs.

Vale
Piscinus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52316 From: Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus Date: 2007-11-11
Subject: Cn. Cornelius Lentulus for Quaestor
Cn. Cornelius Lentulus consulibus, praetoribus, tribunis plebis, Quiritibus salutem plurimam dicit:


Salvete, Quirites!


Seeing the lack of the candidacies for Quaestorship, I offer my knowledge and experience I gained from my previous service when I was Praetorial Quaestor to T. Octavius Pius Ahenobarbus, and I declaire my candidacy for Quaestor once again.

You can see my qualifications and cursus honorum here:
http://www.novaroma.org/civitas/album?id=7694

I thought that the time for declarations is over since the Consul convened the Comitia, but I see others are just coming out with their candidacies, and I also would like to help out our Republic in those offices where it wants volunteers most of all.

I hope the Consul will accept my candidacy.

If not, I will offer it again when he will announce the next call for candidacies for fulfilling the vacant places.


CN. CORNELIVM LENTVLVM QVAESTOREM REI PVBLICAE ORO VOS FACIATIS!



Valete!




Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus,
R O G A T O R
------------------------------------------
Legatus Pro Praetore Provinciae Pannoniae
Sacerdos Provinciae Pannoniae
Accensus Consulis Ti. Galerii Paulini
Scriba Praetricis A. Tulliae Scholasticae
Scriba Aedilis Curulis Iuliae Caesaris Cytheridis Aeges
Scriba Interpretis Linguae Latinae A. Tulliae Scholasticae
-------------------------------------------
Decurio I. Sodalitatis Latinitatis
Dominus Factionis Russatae
Latinista, Classicus Philologus


---------------------------------

---------------------------------
L'email della prossima generazione? Puoi averla con la nuova Yahoo! Mail

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52317 From: Sebastian José Molina Palacios Date: 2007-11-11
Subject: Re: praeturae petitio alius
I am not completely sure about that ecological catastrophe. I think that in Roman times there were less people living on Earth than in the XVIII and XIX century, so the growth of population because of the revolution would have been slowler than in the end of the XVIII¨s one. If nowadays petroleum and coal are going to get exhausted in three centuries (it is said that at the end of the present century), in Roman times I think they would have them for about (perhaps) six or seven centuries and in that case the environmental pollution would have been less problematical than now.
On the other hand, a great part of the actual consumption of petroleum is going to the enormous world military machine. In the antiquity, in the world there world there were only four great empires (Rome, Persia, India and China), and maybe Axum (actual Ethiopia) in Africa, and the most powerful of them was the Roman one; so petroleum wouldn´t be so important for the army.

liviacases <cases@...> escribió:
L. Livia Plauta omnibus S.P.D.

some years ago I read a book on this topic, or rather on the reasons
why Romans didn't adopt the greek love for science. It's "La
rivoluzione dimenticata" by Lucio Russo, published by Feltrinelli in
1996. I don't know if it's translated into English, but an Amazon
search should yeald an answer.

The author examines a lot of archeological evidence (like the
Antikythera mechanism) and literary sources to determine that ancient
greek science was far more advanced than had been supposed, but
Romans were only interested in practical applications, and not in the
theory behind them, so most of the books that survived the centuries
are actually "popular science" that doesn't give the details of the
various sciences. The detailed books were in Greek, and none survived
the centuries of christianity.

Of course Romans were practical minded, and it made much more
economical sense in the circumstances to use cheap slave labour than
machines (though putting it this way is oversimplifying, because
Romans did use at least as many machines as Europe in the 18th
century).

I'm not sure we would be coming from the stars, though, if Romans had
started the industrial revolution: maybe we would just have caused an
ecological catastrophe many centuries ago.

Valete.

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Sebastian José Molina Palacios
<sebastian_andaluz@...> wrote:
>
> I think it´s right what you say, but, anyway, there´s something the
ancient Romans didn´t adopt: the love for sciences and scientific
advances. Ancient Greeks got great achievements in maths, medicine,
physics, astronomy, etc. and what to say about the Library of
Alexandria. Romans were good in engineering and not much more. what
had happened if Romans had begun the industrial revolution? But, in
this case, tradition was more powerful for them and they prefered to
go on with slavery than use machines.
> Many years ago, when i was at the High School, a teacher of
Phisycs told us: "if Romans had begun the industrial revolution, now
we would be coming from stars". I don´t know if that is very
exaggerated, but it made me think and dream.
>
> Quintus Livius Drusus.
>
> "A. Tullia Scholastica" <fororom@...> escribió:
> >
> > A. Tullia Scholastica Flavio Galerio Aureliano quiritibus bonae
voluntatis
> > S.P.D.
> >
> >
> > The Romans loved innovation. They adopted the gods, weapons, farm
> > implements, theatre, divine images, foods, wines, beers, meads,
ships,
> > drinking cups,
> > dinner services, dining couches, ad infinitum from their friends,
allies, and
> > enemies.
> >
> > ATS: Add to that their clothing, since the toga itself seems to
have been
> > borrowed from Etruria, along with those haruspices. However,
social
> > innovation did not seem to be one of their very favorite things.
> >
> > The Romans were one of the most adoptive and adaptive people in
> > the ancient world. All the Romans wanted was Peace, a Roman Peace
along with
> > a
> > little piece of Gaul, a little piece of Germania, most of
Britannia, all of
> > Ptolemic Aegypt, all of Seleucid Persia, Thrace, Greece,
Macedonia . . . the
> > list goes on and on.
> >
> > ATS: Indeed, the Romans were a very pieceful people. A little
piece o¹
> > this, a big piece o¹ that...now why can¹t we get some pieces that
are better
> > than $200 of Texan pasture land (if it can be used as pasture
land...if so,
> > why not rent it out?).
> >
> >
> > I love being a Nova Roman.
> >
> > ATS: Lots of us do.
> >
> >
> > Fl. Galerius Aurelianus
> >
> > Vale, et valete.
> >
> >
> >
>






---------------------------------

Comparte video en la ventana de tus mensajes (y también tus fotos de Flickr).
Usa el nuevo Yahoo! Messenger versión Beta.
Visita http://e1.beta.messenger.yahoo.com/

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52318 From: M·CVR·COMPLVTENSIS Date: 2007-11-11
Subject: Re: AGAINST the LEX GALERIA DE CURSU HONORUM - and a suggestion
Salvete

I am against this Consul's proposed lex and I fully agree with Moravius Piscinus about it.

Valete

COMPLVTENSIS

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52319 From: Tiberius Galerius Paulinus Date: 2007-11-11
Subject: Intercessio on Edict XXIII
Salvete Tribunes

While you are within your right to veto the acts of any
magistrate you must ,when doing so, list those laws or
constitutional provisions that have been violated.
If no law or constitutional provision has
been violated you must show where they have
violated the sprite of same.

You have not done so.

The Laws of Nova Roma allow all of her magistrates to issue
edicts in the furtherance of there office. I issued an edict in
calling forth both the Comitia Centuriata and the
Comitia Populi Tributa for the legitimate purpose of electing
magistrates for next year and for enacting legislation.

Nova Roman law establishes that the magistrate who issues the call
is the convening magistrate. He/she has the duty to insure,as best
that they can, that the election is fair and transparent.

Inherent in the authority to issue an edict is the opposite
authority to withdraw an edict if circumstances warrants such action.

Earlier this year I yielded to the Tribunes and withdrew an edict
appointing a personal representative in California until the Senate
could find and or agree on a candidate for governor.
I then issued another edict that seemed to pass muster with the
Tribunes.

In this current case it is my opinion
that when ONE OF THE MAGISTRATES
CHARGED WITH ADMINISTING THE ELECTION COUNT
RESIGNS IN THE MIDDLE OF AN ELECTION AND ANOTHER
MAGISTRATE ANNOUNCES THAT THEY WILL NOT COUNT
ANY OF THE VOTES CAST BECASE OF TECHNICAL PROBLEMS
AND ISSUES AN EDCIT TO THE EFFECT.

"Po Minucia Strabo Quiritibus Novae Romae S.P.D.
I shall certify no votes in the current Comitia Populi Tributa
or Comitia Centuriata elections. I would encourage my colleague
G. Vipsanius Agrippa to take the same stance, although I realize
I cannot compel him to do so"Â….

Message #1185 of 1187 Fri Nov 9, 2007 5:46 pm

I had two choices do nothing or act so we could regroup
and start with new elections.

I choose the later. Your colleague is right in that I should have
waited for the timeframe for an intercessio to pass. For that I do
stand corrected.

Valete

Tiberius Galerius Paulinus
Consul
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52320 From: David Kling (Modianus) Date: 2007-11-11
Subject: From Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus -- Censor
Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus S.P.D.

Tribunus plebis Fl. Galerius Aurelianus wrote earlier today, "I do not
believe that there is a legal precedent that allows a consul to void
an election due to the oversights, negligence, or malfeasance of a
censor." This seems to demand an explanation.

I believe it was this past Thursday I noticed that citizens in the
database that were listed as Assidui (previous period) were in Century
0, and as a result could not vote. Since only Century 2 was voting I
wrote to my colleague Marcus Octavius Gracchus (who is also magister
arenarius, our webmaster) and inquired about this. The standard
practice is for a program to run right before elections that assigns
citizens to centuries based upon their accumulated century points.
Since Octavius designed the system, he was the one to run the program,
which he had already done. In trying to fix the problem the system
created extra centuries and we had 59 centuries instead of the
customary 51. This left century 51 with only two citizens residing in
it, and both citizens had resigned their citizenship so the century
was empty. It was a problem. The problem was further complicated
because the program that assigned century allocation was run again
after the election, and the citizens in Century 2 where shuffled.

It was discussed how to effectively deal with this situation and what
resulted was that it really couldn't be fixed without getting the
convening magistrate involved. I contacted Tiberius Galerius
Paulinus, since he was the convening magistrate, and told him of the
situation and recommended starting the election over citing the
reasons above. It was agreed by several of us that the sequential
voting, while perhaps historical, is a big problem.

It has been very frustrating! On my end because I feel powerless, it
is a technical problem. We have a complex database that I do not know
how to maintain (I was elected censor, not webmaster). We need more
technical people to maintain, update, and write our database!

In addition to being frustrating for me, I am sure it is also very
frustrating for the convening magistrate. When I was consul I was
blessed with a wonderful colleague, Pompeia Minucia Strabo!
Unfortunately, Consul Paulinus has a colleague that is somewhat less
than wonderful -- a colleague who has disappeared yet again. Being
consul is difficult enough, I'm sure it is harder doing it alone. I
think the additional call for candidates and the extra legislation was
a mistake, I understand that the consul was trying to save time.

What I want to see is an election, but I don't want it at the expense
of proper voting. The centuries need to be adequately represented. I
support the consuls efforts to see that voting is done correctly, and
I support his action to suspend sequential voting. What is important
is that the centuries vote and that their votes are counted!

I hope this answers some of the questions some people might be asking
as to WHY the comitia calls were canceled.

Valete:

Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52321 From: C·ARMINIVS·RECCANELLVS Date: 2007-11-11
Subject: Re: LUDI PLEBEII MUNERA GLADIATORIA
> Fighter 1
> name: Trypho the Thraex
> owner: Lucius Vitellius Triarius
>
> Fighter 2
> name: Fabianix, the Dimachaerus
> owner: Caius Arminius Reccanellus
>
> (...) and then Plebeian Aedile in charge of the games rises and
> signals that Fabianix should keep his life, audience cheers and
> some hansome amount of coins is thrown to the arena.

The ladies from Nova Roma thank you, Aedile. They are very happy
with this result! Some new scars only will excite more the ladies...

> Final fight
> (...) Nemo stands by his enemy and looks down to him without any
> expression in his face. (...) But still there's no expression of
> joy on Nemo's face (...).
> The chilling coldness of Nemo leaves at first the audience into
> ambivalent state of mind. Clearly the fight was one to remember,
> but the way the winner took it was perhaps even more touching and
> remarkable. Strange winner that dark Sarmatian was. Even some
> time after the fight, the people were troubled by his behaviour,
> but there was never an explanation. Perhaps he was there in the
> arena to remind about the tragedies of life and to make the
> audience to think what it means to be a human and what makes our
> life worth living, about the value of life and uniqueness of each
> of us.

That was my first final victory in Munera Gladiatoria, but, as Nemo,
I think I'm not happy with this bloody result!

But, the games, and life, are not fair!!! So, let's comemorate!!
I'll pay the wine this night!!!

:)

Valete, amice
C•ARMINIVS•RECCANELLVS
=====================
TRIBVNVS•PLEBIS•NOVAE•ROMAE
"Quousque tandem, Lula, abutere patientia nostra?"
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52322 From: Caeso Fabius Buteo Quintilianus Date: 2007-11-11
Subject: Get rid of sequential voting
Salve Censor and Salvete Quirites!

>Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus S.P.D.
>
....................
..................

>It was agreed by several of us that the sequential
>voting, while perhaps historical, is a big problem.

It was during my Consulship the "sequential voting" was introduced
and it was part of a political compromise. I was aware of that
sequential voting is historical and when I was offer a compromise
including sequential voting in the reform that really tried to get
away from repeated run off elections (there where times when we had
more than two elections to get one office elected) that was a real
plague in those days and made our election system look ridiculous.

I wanted that dealt with and so I accepted the compromise to also
include sequential voting to get the reform accepted, but I think
reality have shown us our Nova Romans don't listen at all to the
opinion of even the "first class", so I will happily kiss sequential
voting good bye. I recommend the incoming Consuls to reform the
election law "Lex Fabia de ratione comitiorum centuriatorum" to get
rid of sequential voting.
--

Vale

Caeso Fabius Buteo Quintilianus

Senator, Censorius et Consularis
Accensus LAF, Scribae Censoris GFBM
Praeses, Triumvir et Praescriptor Academia Thules ad S.R.A. et N.
Editor-in-Chief, Publisher and Owner of "Roman Times Quarterly"
Sodalitas Egressus Beneficarius et Praefectus Provincia Thules
Civis Romanus sum
************************************************
Aut inveniam viam aut faciam
"I'll either find a way or make one"
************************************************
Dignitas, Iustitia, Fidelitas et Pietas
Dignity, Justice, Loyalty and Dutifulness
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52323 From: Dana-Cooper Date: 2007-11-11
Subject: To US Veterans
Thank you for your service. My sister and I, as former Marines,
extend our thanks and our pride in having served.

Happy Birthday US Marine Corps & Veteran's Day Greetings

Drusilla Ulleria Germanica
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52324 From: Maior Date: 2007-11-11
Subject: Re: Questions for the non candidates & a Candidate responds
M. Hortensia L. Rutilio A. Apollonio Quiritibus spd;
this topic is dear to me.

The Romans were proud of their mos maiorum, their inherited custom
and traditon. We cannot legislate people into following the mos..we
lead and educate.

Now someone may fairly ask me why I am not following the mos and
running for the censor's office. And my answer is: in Roma Antiqua
part of the censor's duties was to supervise public morals. I take
this as a way to educate and lead Nova Romans into incorporating
Romanitas in their daily lives.

Cordus wrote to me a while back 'we need more Roman propaganda." And
I agree with my whole heart. I want to be censor to make Roman
propaganda every day. I've researched and am familiar with
nomenclature, I'm learning how to conduct a census. I can accomplish
these tasks. I want to inspire all cives to be Roman.

1.Do I speak Latin: Not yet, but I can read quite a bit. In a couple
of years I will speak Latin. I've taken a Latin course every year
since I joined Nova Roma in 2003.

2. Do I educate: I do with 'Vox Romana' we've had lectures on Roman
Religion, archeological discoveries, modern Latin dialogues, a
reading of our national epic - The Aeneid.

3. Do I help others get access: I've contributed to the NRwiki
reading lists and articles on a variety of subjects, all documented
with the latest research and with photos. From Augural law to a
photo of my lararium.

4. Do I think 'what would a Roman do' I'm trying, there is a lot to
learn. It will take years but I am educating myself. If I am elected
I'm going to ask K. Buteo Modianus, the augur, to instruct me in how
to take auspices. So I can do it for myself. All magistrates should
take auspices.

We're having the most wonderful Ludi Plebi; if we think of the
year in terms of ; 'oh the Cerealia is coming' we're on our way...

bene valete in pacem deorum
Marca Hortensia Maior
Candidate for Censor

Election Page:http://tinyurl.com/ysu2lv



"And yet people routinely try to solve the day-to-day problems of
Nova Roma not by doing what Romans would do but by doing whatever
pops into their heads."...

it is exactly the way to prevent Romanitas being restored and
sustained."



I speak Latin - not very well, but well enough to have a
conversation - and I meet up frequently with fellow Romans in London
to talk, eat, play games, and have fun in a Roman way. And, most
importantly, when I have to make a decision I try to think about
what Roman republicans, especially the ones I admire, would have
done.
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52325 From: Annia Minucia Marcella Date: 2007-11-11
Subject: Re: To US Veterans
I'd like to repeat those sentiments, I served in the US Army from 1999-2002.

Hail to the Vets! Happy Birthday Marines!


Annia Minucia Marcella
http://www.myspace.com/novabritannia
http://novabritannia.org/
http://minucia.ciarin.com

----- Original Message -----
From: Dana-Cooper
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Sunday, November 11, 2007 4:04 PM
Subject: [Nova-Roma] To US Veterans


Thank you for your service. My sister and I, as former Marines,
extend our thanks and our pride in having served.

Happy Birthday US Marine Corps & Veteran's Day Greetings

Drusilla Ulleria Germanica





[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52326 From: Maior Date: 2007-11-11
Subject: Re: To US Veterans
My father served in the Air Force in WWII & my maternal uncle in the
tank corps with General Patton, my great, great, great Uncle Sam
went up San Juan Hill with Teddy Roosevelt's rough riders and later
was a merchant marine!

To all Nova Romans who have served, who are serving, and will serve
in the military: may Mars give you victory, Minerva protect you and
Iuppiter Optimus Maximus, the protector of Roma, prevail!

I salute you all and give my deepest thanks for your service
Marca Hortensia Maior

> I'd like to repeat those sentiments, I served in the US Army from
1999-2002.
>
> Hail to the Vets! Happy Birthday Marines!
>
>
> Annia Minucia Marcella
> http://www.myspace.com/novabritannia
> http://novabritannia.org/
> http://minucia.ciarin.com
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Dana-Cooper
> To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Sunday, November 11, 2007 4:04 PM
> Subject: [Nova-Roma] To US Veterans
>
>
> Thank you for your service. My sister and I, as former Marines,
> extend our thanks and our pride in having served.
>
> Happy Birthday US Marine Corps & Veteran's Day Greetings
>
> Drusilla Ulleria Germanica
>
>
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52327 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2007-11-11
Subject: Re: To US Veterans
Drusilla Ulleria Germanica <hunterash@...> writes:

> Thank you for your service. My sister and I, as former Marines,
> extend our thanks and our pride in having served.
>
> Happy Birthday US Marine Corps & Veteran's Day Greetings

Thank you Germanica. My thanks also to your sister. I hope you both
had an enjoyable day yesterday.

Also, rather than focus on only the veterans of the United States, I
would like to acknowledge that today is Armistice Day and Rememberence
Day in all the Commonwealth countries. (And France too, I think.) I
would hope that all Nova Romans living in these places would grant the
day the respect it deserves.

Vale,

CN-EQVIT-MARINVS
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52328 From: Ice Hunter Date: 2007-11-11
Subject: Re: To US Veterans
Drusilla Ulleria Germanica scripsit:

>Happy Birthday US Marine Corps & Veteran's Day Greetings

Thank you, Germanica! USAF, 35th TFW, 1976-80 here. My father was an infantryman in WWII (Battle of the Bulge), one of my brothers was infantry in Viet Nam, and one of my sisters was Air Force. Today I remember family and friends and say a prayer for those who currently are serving.

Happy Birthday to the USMC and thanks to all Vets and their families.

Vale optime,
T. Artoria Marcella

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52329 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2007-11-11
Subject: Re: To US Veterans
Annia Minucia Marcella <annia@...> writes:

> I'd like to repeat those sentiments, I served in the US Army from 1999-2002.
>
> Hail to the Vets! Happy Birthday Marines!

Thank you Marcella, and thank you for your service.

Vale,

CN-EQVIT-MARINVS
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52330 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2007-11-11
Subject: Re: To US Veterans
Maior <rory12001@...> writes:

> To all Nova Romans who have served, who are serving, and will serve
> in the military: may Mars give you victory, Minerva protect you and
> Iuppiter Optimus Maximus, the protector of Roma, prevail!

Thank you.

Vale,

CN-EQVIT-MARINVS
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52331 From: Charlie Collins Date: 2007-11-11
Subject: Re: To US Veterans
Another hearty Thank You, Germanica! USN 68' to '80. Atlantic Fleet
Combat Camera Group '74 to '80.

Q Servilius Priscus

On 11/11/07, Ice Hunter <icehunter@...> wrote:
> Drusilla Ulleria Germanica scripsit:
>
> >Happy Birthday US Marine Corps & Veteran's Day Greetings
>
> Thank you, Germanica! USAF, 35th TFW, 1976-80 here. My father was an infantryman in WWII (Battle of the Bulge), one of my brothers was infantry in Viet Nam, and one of my sisters was Air Force. Today I remember family and friends and say a prayer for those who currently are serving.
>
> Happy Birthday to the USMC and thanks to all Vets and their families.
>
> Vale optime,
> T. Artoria Marcella
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52332 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2007-11-11
Subject: Re: To US Veterans
T. Artoria Marcella <icehunter@...> writes:

> Happy Birthday to the USMC and thanks to all Vets and their families.

Thank you Marcella.

Vale,

CN-EQVIT-MARINVS
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52333 From: David Kling (Modianus) Date: 2007-11-11
Subject: Re: To US Veterans
Another US Navy photographer here! USN from 88 - 92 - NAVIMAGCOM
(Washington DC) and USS Dwight D. Eisenhower CVN-69.

Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus

On Nov 11, 2007 6:14 PM, Charlie Collins <servilius.priscus@...> wrote:
>
> Another hearty Thank You, Germanica! USN 68' to '80. Atlantic Fleet
> Combat Camera Group '74 to '80.
>
> Q Servilius Priscus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52334 From: pompeia_minucia_tiberia Date: 2007-11-11
Subject: Lest We Forget
Pompeia Populesque sal.

To all those who have sacrificed their talent, their time, their
lives, their sanity in wars past and present to protect and defend our
freedom, you have my deepest gratitude.

To all those who have met with injustice, including the trauma of
military service in a time of war, I wish you healing.

Valete Omnes
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52335 From: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com Date: 2007-11-11
Subject: Election Information, 11/12/2007, 12:15 am
Reminder from:   Nova-Roma Yahoo! Group
 
Title:   Election Information
 
Date:   Monday November 12, 2007
Time:   12:15 am - 1:15 am
Repeats:   This event repeats every day until Saturday November 17, 2007.
Location:   http://novaroma.org/nr/Election_MMDCCLX_(Nova_Roma)
Notes:   Election information is located at http://novaroma.org/nr/Election_MMDCCLX_%28Nova_Roma%29
 
Copyright © 2007  Yahoo! Inc. All Rights Reserved | Terms of Service | Privacy Policy
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52336 From: pompeia_minucia_tiberia Date: 2007-11-11
Subject: Re: The Comitia Populi Tributa is called
---Salvete M. Curiatus Complutensis Tribune, Tiberius Galerius
Paulinus Consul et Omnes.


I am an awful girl to nag,I know :>), but I have some serious
questions about this comitia call.

I. The C. Pop. Tributa, C. Centuriata elections were stopped for good
reasons, and I feel that the Consul acted appropriately. Stopped due
to an unfortunate complication with century alignment. What evolved
out of the election experience was a realization that the sequential
voting was complicating the whole process. For this reason or that,
it isn't working...it is not being followed properly. It is too
complicated for busy citizens living in different time zones, with
varying knowledge of historical details, and varying languages. It is
not lending to an accurate election result, or fair voter privilege,
except in the strictest legalistic context.

That said, why are we not seeing this addressed on the current ballot,
as the Consul said he would do in his edict canceling the elections?

The Tribunes were written to ask if you collectively saw a problem
with foregoing the sequential voting aspect of the Lex Fabia Ratione
Comitium Centuriatum due to the problems it is producing. This was
Friday, and now Sunday the comitia is called with a one-day contio no
less, which doesn't even allot time for the Tribunes to consider the
comitia call in any case, to see if they have issues with it. My
concern is: if the Tribunes are being asked to cooperate with the
modification of a comitia law for the benefit of the people, should it
be unreasonable to *expect* to see a modification of this law before
the people to fix this problem once and for all? You are being asked
to ignore the law, and with sound rationale... but with no steps on
the part of the Consul to repair the problem. To add, any Consular
edict modifying the process is going to expire in January 2008. And
we are left with the same problem.

II. My next concern I've touched on above, but it is the length of
the contio itself. When new laws are introduced, and one has been, we
need a contio of 5 days. The only provision in the Leges Fabiae on
Comitia Pop Tributa/Comitia Centuriata elections for such a short
contio is in the case of magisterial vacancies.

http://www.novaroma.org/tabularium/leges/2003-12-02-i.html

http://www.novaroma.org/tabularium/leges/2003-10-08-i.html


I would remind the Tribunes that regardless of this short contio, you
still have by the constitution 72 hours to pronounce intercessio for
any reason you see legally necessary. Why I'm raising these concerns
up front. I don't want to have to do this again. Nobody does I'm
sure...and, with respect, to race into things with steeplechase
velocity only begs for errors and further disillusionment.

III. My next issue concerns the Proposed Lex Galeria de Curso Honorum
. I've said already that the contio is too short for a brand new lex,
and the lex itself is legally inappropriate:

Since when does the Comitia Populi Tributa set policy for the Comitia
Centuriata's internal affairs....including their magistrates'
qualifications, penalties for their resigned magistrates, etc.? The
constitution is clear when it states that each comitia enacts laws and
regulations governing their own respective internal affairs. This law
will cover only Comitia Populi Tributa magistrates. This comitia in
itself can't strip century points from a Consul if he resigns, set
qualifications for Praetor or Censor.

In short:

This lex is improperly promulgated.

It is not legally binding on the Comitia Centuriata or the internal
affairs of Comitia Plebis Tributa

*********

These are my legal concerns. I agree with those who think more time
is needed to discuss Cursus Honorum requirements, penalties for
resignations, etc.......and some other time. We have laws in place
which will do nicely for now..right now we should be focusing on the
more pressing issue, which is the sequential voting problem...the
problem you have been asked to turn a legal blind eye in favour of,
but yet remains unaddressed by the Consul, as per his pledge.

I recommend the Consul rewrite his comitia calls, with a proper contio
length...write a modification of the clause of the Lex Fabia
concerning sequential voting for contio (shouldn't take that long) and
promulate it in the Comitia Centuriata not Comitia Populi Tributa.
Also, I would nix the Cursus Honourum offering for reasons explained
above.

My thanks in advance to the Consul and Tribunes for consideration of
my concerns.

Valete
Po Minucua Strabo
Custos/Procuratrix
Senatrix

In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, M·CVR·COMPLVTENSIS <complutensis@...>
wrote:
>
> Marcus Curiatius Complutensis omnes civibus Novae Romae S·P·D·
>
> Ex officio Tribuni Plebis
>
> Salvete
>
> Now it seems we have much in a hurry to finish the elections. After
the problems with the centuries I would have preferred a little more
calm ......and scheduling the election respecting the intercessio
period......
>
> Recently I declared invalidad the candidacy of one of my colleagues
who wished to stand for the same office.
>
> Now my friend Marinus, against the Lex Salicia de Continuatio et
Cumulatio, asked us, the Tribunes, to make an exception and allow him
an accumulation of charges before term forecast (Dec 15).
>
> Seems that I am the only Tribune who is working, because I have
asked the opinion of my colleagues without reply.
>
> In these circumstances I cannot accept the second candidacy of
Equitius Marinus and I ask him to wait the term fixed by law.
>
> All this knowing that Equitius Marinus is a very skilled and
probably the most suitable candidate to fill these two positions
simultaneously, but the law is the law.
>
> Now I want make a declaration: we the Tribunes were consulted and
required to make an exception to the law, but at no time did we
declare for or against.
>
> The Consul Galerius Paulinus has committed a serie of faults:
>
> 1 .- put in the mouth of the tribunes words ever uttered
> 2 .- declare valid an candidacy declaration which had not been
published by the candidate in the ML according to the consular edict.
> 3.- declare valid an candidacy declaration that he knew was not valid
> 4.- call the Comitia without respecting the intercessio period.
>
> I do not want to outlaw these elections, therefore I cannot support
the veto of my colleague Galerius Aurelianus but I want ask the Consul
to refrain from committing further irregularities.
>
> Valete
>
> M·CVRIATIVS·COMPLVTENSIS
> TRIBVNVS PLEBIS
> NOVA ROMA
>
> -------------------------------------------
>
> ex paucis multa, ex minimis maxima
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52337 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2007-11-11
Subject: Re: Revising the voting procedure in the Comitia Centuriata
Salve Tiberia, et salvete quirites,

pompeia_minucia_tiberia <pompeia_minucia_tiberia@...> writes:

[an awful lot, well thought out]

I'm just going to address this part:
> That said, why are we not seeing this addressed on the current ballot,
> as the Consul said he would do in his edict canceling the elections?

I think Consul Paulinus wants to simply waive the sequential voting
for this election, and leave reform of the law to next year's consuls.

I would agree with this approach. Changing any law should take time,
even when we have something as straightforward as we think we have
here, where the only change that appears to be needed is removal of
the sequential voting specifications.

Vale, et valete,

CN-EQVIT-MARINVS
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 52338 From: pompeia_minucia_tiberia Date: 2007-11-11
Subject: Re: Revising the voting procedure in the Comitia Centuriata
---Salvete Gn. Equitius Marinus, Honoured Tribunes, Galerius Consul:

With respect, we've been chipping away at election process tweaks for
a few years, to little avail. Changes of this nature are slow.
Goodness, I don't expect the Consul to rewrite large portions of the
Lex Fabia by any means...there is alot of benefit to the law.

How about a simple amendment to cover us until next year's consuls, if
they choose, make more permanent revisions to the law? We don't know
when we will have to call the comitia centuriata again for a
magistrate...it could be like February..'Where Fortune leads us, no
man can know'

How's about 'Sequential voting for magistrates as described in this
lex may be waived at the discretion of the presiding magistrate'

Even that'll do. Until future administrations decide on another plan
altogether, if they like. A little Zantac for future, unexpected
bellyaches.

Valete
Pompeia


In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Gnaeus Equitius Marinus <gawne@...> wrote:
>
> Salve Tiberia, et salvete quirites,
>
> pompeia_minucia_tiberia <pompeia_minucia_tiberia@...> writes:
>
> [an awful lot, well thought out]
>
> I'm just going to address this part:
> > That said, why are we not seeing this addressed on the current ballot,
> > as the Consul said he would do in his edict canceling the elections?
>
> I think Consul Paulinus wants to simply waive the sequential voting
> for this election, and leave reform of the law to next year's consuls.
>
> I would agree with this approach. Changing any law should take time,
> even when we have something as straightforward as we think we have
> here, where the only change that appears to be needed is removal of
> the sequential voting specifications.
>
> Vale, et valete,
>
> CN-EQVIT-MARINVS
>