Selected messages in Nova-Roma group. Dec 7-12, 2007

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53315 From: marcushoratius Date: 2007-12-07
Subject: Re: Real temples !--No, real rites and offerings.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53316 From: Stephen Gallagher Date: 2007-12-07
Subject: More candidates needed
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53317 From: Titus Flavius Aquila Date: 2007-12-07
Subject: AW: [Nova-Roma] Re: Real temples !--No, real rites and offerings.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53318 From: Patrick D. Owen Date: 2007-12-07
Subject: Re: Dies Religiosus versus Dies Ater?--Responsum Pontificum de Diebu
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53319 From: Titus Flavius Aquila Date: 2007-12-07
Subject: AW: [Nova-Roma] Re: Real temples
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53320 From: Maxima Valeria Messallina Date: 2007-12-07
Subject: Re: Vesta statue
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53321 From: Maior Date: 2007-12-07
Subject: Re: Real temples
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53322 From: L�AVR�SEVERVS Date: 2007-12-07
Subject: Announcement of Candidacy
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53323 From: M. Lucretius Agricola Date: 2007-12-07
Subject: Re: Oath of office in Latin (template)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53324 From: marius.lupus Date: 2007-12-07
Subject: Re: Real temples
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53325 From: M. Lucretius Agricola Date: 2007-12-07
Subject: Re: Dies Religiosus verses Dies Ater?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53326 From: M. Lucretius Agricola Date: 2007-12-07
Subject: Re: Real temples !--No, real rites and offerings.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53327 From: A. Apollonius Cordus Date: 2007-12-07
Subject: De sententiis meis
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53328 From: A. Apollonius Cordus Date: 2007-12-07
Subject: Re: Magistratuum munera convenientiaque petitorum
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53329 From: A. Apollonius Cordus Date: 2007-12-07
Subject: De edicto censorio
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53330 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2007-12-07
Subject: Away from the keyboard until Sunday evening
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53331 From: A. Apollonius Cordus Date: 2007-12-07
Subject: De dictatoribus senatusque consultis ultimis
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53332 From: A. Apollonius Cordus Date: 2007-12-07
Subject: De religione
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53333 From: pompeia_minucia_tiberia Date: 2007-12-07
Subject: Re: De religione
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53334 From: marcushoratius Date: 2007-12-07
Subject: a. d. VI Eidus Decembris
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53335 From: marcushoratius Date: 2007-12-07
Subject: Re: De religione
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53336 From: Gaius Petronius Dexter Date: 2007-12-08
Subject: Re: Real temples
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53337 From: Q. Caecilius Metellus Date: 2007-12-08
Subject: Re: De religione
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53338 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2007-12-08
Subject: Re: Real temples
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53339 From: pompeia_minucia_tiberia Date: 2007-12-08
Subject: Re: De religione
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53340 From: C. Curius Saturninus Date: 2007-12-08
Subject: Re: Digest Number 3710
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53341 From: GAIVS IVLIANVS Date: 2007-12-08
Subject: Re: Dies Religiosus verses Dies Ater?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53342 From: GAIVS IVLIANVS Date: 2007-12-08
Subject: Which type of Pileus is worn at Saturnalia?!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53343 From: Maior Date: 2007-12-08
Subject: Re: Real temples
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53344 From: GAIVS IVLIANVS Date: 2007-12-08
Subject: Wearing the Pileus at Saturnalia Survey!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53345 From: Gens Iulia Date: 2007-12-08
Subject: Re: Real temples - Petronius Dexter and Horatius
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53346 From: M. Lucretius Agricola Date: 2007-12-08
Subject: Re: Dies Religiosus verses Dies Ater?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53347 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2007-12-08
Subject: Re: Real temples
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53348 From: liviacases Date: 2007-12-08
Subject: Re: De religione
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53349 From: Maior Date: 2007-12-08
Subject: Re: Real temples - Petronius Dexter and Horatius
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53350 From: Adriano Rota Date: 2007-12-08
Subject: Re: Wearing the Pileus at Saturnalia Survey!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53351 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2007-12-08
Subject: Re: Wearing the Pileus at Saturnalia Survey!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53352 From: marcushoratius Date: 2007-12-08
Subject: a. d. V Eidus Decembris
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53353 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2007-12-09
Subject: Re: Digest Number 3710
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53354 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2007-12-09
Subject: a.s. II diem Natalem Christi
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53355 From: marcushoratius Date: 2007-12-09
Subject: Terra Mater
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53356 From: Titus Flavius Aquila Date: 2007-12-09
Subject: AW: [Nova-Roma] a.s. II diem Natalem Christi
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53357 From: GAIVS IVLIANVS Date: 2007-12-09
Subject: Which type of Pileus was worn at Saturnalia?!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53358 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2007-12-09
Subject: Re: a.s. II diem Natalem Christi
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53359 From: Quintus Iulius Probus Date: 2007-12-09
Subject: Oath of the Office
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53360 From: marcushoratius Date: 2007-12-09
Subject: Re: a.s. II diem Natalem Christi
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53361 From: Stephen Gallagher Date: 2007-12-09
Subject: FW: [Explorator] explorator 10.33
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53362 From: Bruno Cantermi Date: 2007-12-09
Subject: Re: a.s. II diem Natalem Christi
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53363 From: Maior Date: 2007-12-09
Subject: Re: a.s. II diem Natalem Christi
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53364 From: Titus Iulius Sabinus Date: 2007-12-09
Subject: Re: Terra Mater
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53365 From: Maior Date: 2007-12-09
Subject: Re: Terra Mater
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53366 From: Gens Iulia Date: 2007-12-09
Subject: Re: Real temples - Petronius Dexter and Horatius
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53367 From: Gens Iulia Date: 2007-12-09
Subject: Re: a.s. II diem Natalem Christi
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53368 From: Maior Date: 2007-12-09
Subject: Re: Real temples - Petronius Dexter and Horatius
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53369 From: Gens Iulia Date: 2007-12-09
Subject: Re: a.s. II diem Natalem Christi - Marca Hortensia
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53370 From: iulius sabinus Date: 2007-12-09
Subject: Re: a.s. II diem Natalem Christi - Marca Hortensia
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53371 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2007-12-09
Subject: Re: Real temples
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53372 From: liviacases Date: 2007-12-09
Subject: Lucia Livia Plauta - Oath of office
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53373 From: Maior Date: 2007-12-09
Subject: Re: a.s. II diem Natalem Christi - Marca Hortensia
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53374 From: Stephen Gallagher Date: 2007-12-09
Subject: The Comitia Populi Tributa is called
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53375 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2007-12-09
Subject: Re: a.s. II diem Natalem Christi
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53376 From: os390account Date: 2007-12-09
Subject: Oath Of Office - Tribunus Plebis
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53377 From: M. Lucretius Agricola Date: 2007-12-09
Subject: Re: Real temples - Petronius Dexter and Horatius
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53378 From: Stephen Gallagher Date: 2007-12-09
Subject: The link to Lucius Aurelius Severus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53379 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2007-12-09
Subject: Re: Oath of office in Latin (template)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53380 From: Stephen Gallagher Date: 2007-12-09
Subject: Our profound condolences
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53381 From: Titus Arminius Genialis Date: 2007-12-09
Subject: RES: [Nova-Roma] The Comitia Populi Tributa is called
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53382 From: marcushoratius Date: 2007-12-09
Subject: Re: RES: [Nova-Roma] The Comitia Populi Tributa is called
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53383 From: Maior Date: 2007-12-09
Subject: Re: RES: [Nova-Roma] The Comitia Populi Tributa is called
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53384 From: marcushoratius Date: 2007-12-09
Subject: a. d. IIII Eidus Decembris: Lux Mundi
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53385 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2007-12-09
Subject: Re: AW: [Nova-Roma] a.s. II diem Natalem Christi
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53386 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2007-12-10
Subject: Narbaz
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53387 From: Annia Minucia Marcella Date: 2007-12-10
Subject: Re: a.s. II diem Natalem Christi
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53388 From: M.CVRIATIVS COMPLVTENSIS Date: 2007-12-10
Subject: Re: RES: [Nova-Roma] The Comitia Populi Tributa is called
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53389 From: Kristoffer From Date: 2007-12-10
Subject: Re: The Comitia Populi Tributa is called
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53390 From: Gaius Petronius Dexter Date: 2007-12-10
Subject: Re: Oath Of Office - Tribunus Plebis
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53391 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2007-12-10
Subject: Re: Oath Of Office - Tribunus Plebis
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53392 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2007-12-10
Subject: Re: RES: [Nova-Roma] The Comitia Populi Tributa is called
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53393 From: titus.aquila Date: 2007-12-10
Subject: Re: a.s. II diem Natalem Christi
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53394 From: Stephen Gallagher Date: 2007-12-10
Subject: Taking suggestions and making the lex better.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53395 From: Gaius Aemilius Crassus Date: 2007-12-10
Subject: Re: De dictatoribus senatusque consultis ultimis
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53396 From: os390account Date: 2007-12-10
Subject: Re: Oath Of Office - Tribunus Plebis
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53397 From: Gaius Aemilius Crassus Date: 2007-12-10
Subject: De lege Galeria de curso honorum.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53398 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2007-12-10
Subject: NO on Lex Galeria de Cursu Honorum
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53399 From: David Kling (Modianus) Date: 2007-12-10
Subject: Re: NO on Lex Galeria de Cursu Honorum
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53400 From: Stephen Gallagher Date: 2007-12-10
Subject: Re: YES on Lex Galeria de Cursu Honorum
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53401 From: bill segura Date: 2007-12-10
Subject: Re: Vesta statue
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53402 From: David Kling (Modianus) Date: 2007-12-10
Subject: Re: YES on Lex Galeria de Cursu Honorum
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53403 From: Gens Iulia Date: 2007-12-10
Subject: Re: a.s. II diem Natalem Christi - G Equitius Cato
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53405 From: Sextus Lucilius Tutor Date: 2007-12-10
Subject: Galleries
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53406 From: M•IVL•SEVERVS Date: 2007-12-10
Subject: AGAINST A BAD LEX
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53407 From: Sextus Lucilius Tutor Date: 2007-12-10
Subject: Re: AGAINST A BAD LEX
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53408 From: M•IVL•SEVERVS Date: 2007-12-10
Subject: A BAD LEX IS A BAD LEX...
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53409 From: marcushoratius Date: 2007-12-10
Subject: Re: Galleries
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53410 From: Ice Hunter Date: 2007-12-10
Subject: Re: YES on Lex Galeria de Cursu Honorum
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53411 From: Maior Date: 2007-12-10
Subject: Re: AGAINST A BAD LEX
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53412 From: Stephen Gallagher Date: 2007-12-10
Subject: A Good Lex is a good Lex
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53413 From: Stephen Gallagher Date: 2007-12-10
Subject: Re: YES on Lex Galeria de Cursu Honorum
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53414 From: Nabarz Date: 2007-12-10
Subject: Re: a.s. II diem Natalem Christi
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53415 From: Gens Iulia Date: 2007-12-10
Subject: Re: Real temples - Petronius Dexter and Horatius
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53416 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2007-12-10
Subject: Re: a.s. II diem Natalem Christi - G Equitius Cato
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53417 From: Titus Flavius Aquila Date: 2007-12-10
Subject: The senate call
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53418 From: Maior Date: 2007-12-10
Subject: Re: a.s. II diem Natalem Christi
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53419 From: David Kling (Modianus) Date: 2007-12-10
Subject: Re: A Good Lex is a good Lex
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53420 From: M•IVL•SEVERVS Date: 2007-12-10
Subject: GOOD LEX?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53421 From: Michael Echevarria Date: 2007-12-10
Subject: Re: a.s. II diem Natalem Christi - G Equitius Cato
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53422 From: Nabarz Date: 2007-12-10
Subject: Re: a.s. II diem Natalem Christi
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53423 From: Maior Date: 2007-12-10
Subject: Re: a.s. II diem Natalem Christi
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53424 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2007-12-10
Subject: Re: a.s. II diem Natalem Christi - G Equitius Cato
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53425 From: Nabarz Date: 2007-12-10
Subject: Re: a.s. II diem Natalem Christi
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53426 From: Patrick D. Owen Date: 2007-12-10
Subject: AGONALIA TOMORROW - DEC 11. (NP)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53427 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2007-12-10
Subject: Re: a.s. II diem Natalem Christi
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53428 From: marcushoratius Date: 2007-12-10
Subject: Re: a.s. II diem Natalem Christi
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53429 From: Maior Date: 2007-12-10
Subject: Re: a.s. II diem Natalem Christi
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53430 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2007-12-10
Subject: Re: a.s. II diem Natalem Christi
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53431 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2007-12-10
Subject: Re: a.s. II diem Natalem Christi
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53432 From: Maior Date: 2007-12-10
Subject: Re: a.s. II diem Natalem Christi
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53433 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2007-12-10
Subject: Re: a.s. II diem Natalem Christi
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53434 From: Michael Echevarria Date: 2007-12-10
Subject: Re: a.s. II diem Natalem Christi
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53435 From: Maior Date: 2007-12-10
Subject: Re: a.s. II diem Natalem Christi
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53436 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2007-12-10
Subject: Re: NO on Lex Galeria de Cursu Honorum
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53437 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2007-12-10
Subject: Re: a.s. II diem Natalem Christi
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53438 From: marcushoratius Date: 2007-12-10
Subject: a. d. III Eidus Decembris
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53440 From: Maior Date: 2007-12-11
Subject: Re: a.s. II diem Natalem Christi
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53441 From: Gaius Petronius Dexter Date: 2007-12-11
Subject: Re: a. d. III Eidus Decembris
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53442 From: M. Lucretius Agricola Date: 2007-12-11
Subject: Re: Real temples - Petronius Dexter and Horatius
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53443 From: David Kling (Modianus) Date: 2007-12-11
Subject: Re: a.s. II diem Natalem Christi
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53444 From: Gaius Petronius Dexter Date: 2007-12-11
Subject: Re: AGONALIA TOMORROW - DEC 11. (NP)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53445 From: c_cornelius_rufus Date: 2007-12-11
Subject: Re: A Good Lex is a good Lex
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53446 From: Michael Echevarria Date: 2007-12-11
Subject: Re: a.s. II diem Natalem Christi
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53447 From: David Kling (Modianus) Date: 2007-12-11
Subject: Re: a.s. II diem Natalem Christi
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53448 From: Michael Echevarria Date: 2007-12-11
Subject: Re: a.s. II diem Natalem Christi
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53449 From: M Arminius Maior Date: 2007-12-11
Subject: Results, First Class (was Re: [Nova-Roma] Results of Comitia Centuri
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53451 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2007-12-11
Subject: Re: a.s. II diem Natalem Christi
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53452 From: Michael Echevarria Date: 2007-12-11
Subject: Re: a.s. II diem Natalem Christi
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53453 From: Nabarz Date: 2007-12-11
Subject: Re: a.s. II diem Natalem Christi
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53454 From: Titus Flavius Aquila Date: 2007-12-11
Subject: AW: [Nova-Roma] Re: a.s. II diem Natalem Christi
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53455 From: Maior Date: 2007-12-11
Subject: Re: a.s. II diem Natalem Christi
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53456 From: Gens Iulia Date: 2007-12-11
Subject: Re: Narbaz
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53457 From: Gens Iulia Date: 2007-12-11
Subject: HAPPY HANNUKAH!!... plus a few other issues
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53458 From: marius.lupus Date: 2007-12-11
Subject: Daily rituals in latin
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53459 From: marcushoratius Date: 2007-12-11
Subject: Hoc Agete! [ a. d. III Eidus Decembris]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53460 From: Maior Date: 2007-12-11
Subject: Re: HAPPY HANNUKAH!!... plus a few other issues
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53461 From: Lucius Rutilius Minervalis Date: 2007-12-11
Subject: Re: a.s. II diem Natalem Christi
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53462 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2007-12-11
Subject: Re: a.s. II diem Natalem Christi
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53463 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2007-12-11
Subject: Hoc Agete! [ a. d. III Eidus Decembris]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53464 From: liviacases Date: 2007-12-11
Subject: Rome, rooms of Augustus' house on the Palatine
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53465 From: Publius Memmius Albucius Date: 2007-12-11
Subject: Re: Rome, rooms of Augustus' house on the Palatine
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53466 From: iulius sabinus Date: 2007-12-11
Subject: Re: Rome, rooms of Augustus' - short link.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53467 From: phoenixfyre17 Date: 2007-12-11
Subject: Re: Daily rituals in latin
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53468 From: phoenixfyre17 Date: 2007-12-11
Subject: Re: a.s. II diem Natalem Christi
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53469 From: Marcus Hirtius Date: 2007-12-11
Subject: Re: About Christians in Nova Roma
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53470 From: marcus_hirtius_ahenobarbus Date: 2007-12-11
Subject: Re: About Christians in Nova Roma
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53471 From: marcushoratius Date: 2007-12-11
Subject: Hoc Agete! [ a. d. III Eidus Decembris]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53472 From: Maior Date: 2007-12-11
Subject: Re: Daily rituals in latin
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53473 From: marius.lupus Date: 2007-12-11
Subject: Re: Daily rituals in latin
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53474 From: marius.lupus Date: 2007-12-12
Subject: Re: a.s. II diem Natalem Christi
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53475 From: Adriano Rota Date: 2007-12-12
Subject: Re: About Christians in Nova Roma
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53476 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2007-12-12
Subject: Hoc Agete! [ a. d. III Eidus Decembris]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53477 From: Titus Flavius Aquila Date: 2007-12-12
Subject: AW: [Nova-Roma] Re: a.s. II diem Natalem Christi / Saturnalia approa
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53478 From: Maior Date: 2007-12-12
Subject: Re: About Christians in Nova Roma
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53479 From: L. Vitellius Triarius Date: 2007-12-12
Subject: Re: a.s. II diem Natalem Christi
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53480 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2007-12-12
Subject: Re: Results, First Class (was Re: [Nova-Roma] Results of Comitia Cen
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53482 From: Nabarz Date: 2007-12-12
Subject: Re: About Christians in Nova Roma
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53483 From: Nabarz Date: 2007-12-12
Subject: Re: Narbaz
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53484 From: Claudio Guzzo Date: 2007-12-12
Subject: Re: a.s. II diem Natalem Christi
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53485 From: David Kling (Modianus) Date: 2007-12-12
Subject: Collegium Pontificum voting results
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53486 From: os390account Date: 2007-12-12
Subject: Re: a.s. II diem Natalem Christi
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53487 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2007-12-12
Subject: Re: About Christians in Nova Roma
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53488 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2007-12-12
Subject: Re: a.s. II diem Natalem Christi
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53489 From: Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus Date: 2007-12-12
Subject: The Year of Concordia - The Tenth Anniversary of Nova Roma
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53490 From: Gaius Petronius Dexter Date: 2007-12-12
Subject: Re: About Christians in Nova Roma
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53491 From: David Kling (Modianus) Date: 2007-12-12
Subject: Re: The Year of Concordia - The Tenth Anniversary of Nova Roma
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53492 From: Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus Date: 2007-12-12
Subject: Re: The Year of Concordia - The Tenth Anniversary of Nova Roma
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53493 From: David Kling (Modianus) Date: 2007-12-12
Subject: Re: The Year of Concordia - The Tenth Anniversary of Nova Roma
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53494 From: Lucius Quirinus Date: 2007-12-12
Subject: Re: a.s. II diem Natalem Christi/Jesus never Existed



Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53315 From: marcushoratius Date: 2007-12-07
Subject: Re: Real temples !--No, real rites and offerings.
Salve mi Agricola

Exactly!

Many people think of the religio Romana in terms of how it has been
presented by Hollywood and the movie industries in other countries.
Well, there is much to be said for the pomp that attended the sacra
publica of the Roman State. Such displays were only part of the
religio Romana, and I would say only a very small part of the religio
Romana. When the Emperor of Japan goes forth on parade in full
regalia to visit a shrine and offer worship to his divine ancestors
this is comparable to the public displays that were once seen in
imperial Rome. And then there are the millions of Japanese who every
day offer countless acts of worship at small shrines by the roadside,
near trees, in their back yards or in their homes or in cemetaries,
and there are the thousands who each day visit the many shrines and
temples found in the islands of Japan. All that is part of their
religion as well. Imperial spectacle is fine, but as far as
importance, it means little, ultimately, than the gesture of one man
when taken out of the context of millions of worshippers who join
with him every day.

In my mind Shintoism may be the closest religion seen in the modern
world to what can be compared to the religio Romana. As far as
practices, one can find closer parallels in Hinduism. But you find
in Shintoism a worship of the ancestors that I think is closer to
Roman ideas. And there are the many lesser deities of Nature, and
also the spirits of travellers, or ghosts if you will - the Manes who
are remembered in those isles. There are spirits warded off by the
sound of drums and gongs, by the laughter of festivals, by the
lighting of candles in the dark. There are spirits whose presence are
invoked by the sound of the flute and the graceful movement of
dance. Then also are the greater Gods and Goddesses of the sea, and
of the earth, of the stars and of the sky above. There is nothing in
the Shintoism of Japan that would seem unfamiliar to a Roman.

As much as I too enjoy the spectacle of a pompa, it is the simple and
sincere worship offered by Numa Pompilius, directly between the man
and Egeria, or directly between Faunus and Numa, and between Numa and
Jupiter, with which I identify the religio Romana. Its simplest and
purest form. Everything else was decoration for the benefit of the
masses. But without that interconnection between the individual and
the divine in Nature there was no real religio Romana. Going through
rituals, murmuring Latin phrases that you don't really understand, is
just superstitio. Before all else, the foundation for our religious
tradition - whether we see it in terms of an individual or of a
community - has got to be the discovery, recognition, interconnection
of ourselves in the divine. Then, maybe, the Gods will once more
walk among us.

Ten days from now we will celebrate Saturnalia. We celebrate that
Golden Era when the Gods walked among us, when the Gods were a part
of our society, visited our homes daily. It is a time of peace when
we recommit ourselves to bringing the Gods back into our lives and
into our hearts. Fitting, too, Hanukkah has begun already this year,
with our Jewish sisters and brothers remembering their ancestors and
the roots of their religious tradition. And soon to follow our
Christian brothers and sisters will celebrate their holidays of this
season as well. Peace on earth, peace among men and women of good
will, peace among the sons and daughters of Quirinus, the
grandchildren of Mars. the great grandchildren of Jupiter, and the
generations of Saturnus.

Io Saturnalia! Io triumphe!
Annum Novum faustum felicem tibi, mi Agricola

M Moravius Piscinus


--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "M. Lucretius Agricola"
<wm_hogue@...> wrote:
>
> Agricola Piscino sal.
>
> You speak rightly. The feeling that you mention leads people to do
> this, for example. http://www.flickr.com/photos/agricola/1036241256/
>
> optime vale!
>
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "marcushoratius" <mhoratius@>
wrote:
> >
> > Salve mi Sexte Lucili
> >
> > "In ancient times (today's) temples began as sacred precincts,
first
> > set off and solemnized by augures, then at length they were
> > consecrated by the pontifices, and finally temples were erected
on
> > them." ~ Servius, Ad Aeneis 1.446
> >
> >
> > Something to consider is that our ancestors did not randomly
choose to
> > erect temples in just any locations. Noster Stoicus wrote:
> >
> > "Have you ever come upon a grove thick with venerable trees which
> > tower above the ordinary height and by their layers of
intertwined
> > branches dim the light of Heaven? The loftiness of the forest,
its
> > quiet seclusion, the marvel of thick and unbroken shade in
untrammeled
> > space will impart to you a conviction of the divine." ~ Seneca,
> > Epistula 41.3
> >
> > I would say that one has to hear the Gods calling, has to "feel"
Their
> > presence, intuit Their calling to you, and experience Them in a
> > locus. That is where one should offer worship. Such a place
should
> > be set off, as a locus, its boundaries marked off by stones,
perhaps
> > with ribbons hung between the trees to encircle its perimeters;
the
> > augures erecting the templum through auspicia to sanctify the
place.
> > Then over time, through continues use, the locus may be made into
a
> > fanum, with a permanent altar, an enclosing wall, and a column on
> > which would be an image of the God or Goddess for whom the place
is
> > dedicated. then some day a small aedes can be built, as a
sacullum,
> > and the deity invoked to send down His or Her numen to inhabit
the
> > place. But before we make any such plans to construct edifices,
we
> > must do as our ancestors and find the presence of the divine
first.
> >
> > Mi Stoicus Sexte, where did Seneca advise Lucilius in that
epistle to
> > look for the divine?
> >
> > Vale et vade in pace Deorum
> >
> > M Moravius Piscinus
> >
> >
> >
> > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Svm Stoicus" <phorus@> wrote:
> > >
> > > Salve!
> > >
> > > My opinion is that time is directing to build the Temple. Who
has
> > sensibility can see what happen around us. I think that Gods
speak to
> > us but who can notices them call?
> > >
> > > Vale
> > >
> > > Sextus Lucilius Tutor
> > >
> > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> > >
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53316 From: Stephen Gallagher Date: 2007-12-07
Subject: More candidates needed
Tiberius Galerius Paulinus S. P. D.

We have three citizens who have come forward to stand for
Quaestor. We still need at least one candidate for Custos.

To serve in any of these offices must have been a citizen for at least
six months by Kal. Ian. 2761 (January 1st, 2008) and be an assiduus
(tax-paying) citizen. Must be at least 21 years old as of Kal. Ian. 2761
(January 1st, 2008).

Please consider standing.

Citizens have until 18:00 Roman time on Saturday Dec 8th (CET)
to announce your candidacy here in the forum.

Valete

Tiberius Galerius Paulinus
Consul
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53317 From: Titus Flavius Aquila Date: 2007-12-07
Subject: AW: [Nova-Roma] Re: Real temples !--No, real rites and offerings.
T.Flavius Aquila Sexto Lucili Tutor Queastor designatus salutem plurimam dicit

Salve Tutor ,

very well spoken , I applause and support your statements ! You identify precisely the elements .

Vale optime
Titus Flavius Aquila
Scriba Censoris KFBM
Tribunus Plebis designatus



----- Ursprüngliche Mail ----
Von: Svm Stoicus <phorus@...>
An: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Gesendet: Freitag, den 7. Dezember 2007, 19:34:15 Uhr
Betreff: [Nova-Roma] Re: Real temples !--No, real rites and offerings.

Salve,

thank you for your long explain, but what you have against my opinion? I think that is it important symbol, symbol which shows that we are here that it isnt only club of gardeners. Poeple must look that Nova Roma isnt only game about ranks, we must go out from virtual world and enter to real world. And the Temple is first step how we can show that we are here. In our era dont fight with weapons against barbarians nations but we fight against narrow-minded culture without destination.
The Temple for reborn old order, therefore to Nova Roma begin to live in real world.

Seneca spoke against superstitiousness, no against divine.

Vale my friend

Sextus Lucilius Tutor

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]





Heute schon einen Blick in die Zukunft von E-Mails wagen? Versuchen Sie´s mit dem neuen Yahoo! Mail. www.yahoo.de/mail

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53318 From: Patrick D. Owen Date: 2007-12-07
Subject: Re: Dies Religiosus versus Dies Ater?--Responsum Pontificum de Diebu
Fl. Galerius Aurelianus fl. Cer. sal.

The Collegium Pontificum issued this decretum concerning the
definition of the various dies in MMDXXLVIII9IX). While not meant
to be the end all discussion and scholarly work on the dies, it
represents some of the best work of the combined resources of the
Sacred Colleges and input of Nova Roma:

COLLEGIUM PONTIFICUM
Responsum Pontificum de Diebus
According to the Mos Majorum and to the Jus Sacrum, the pontifices
of Nova Roma interpret the meaning of the different fasti of the
Roman calendar in the following way:

I. Dies FASTI (F): These are dies profesti, normal working days in
which the Gods favour human activities.
1.Tribunals may be open and the praetores may fully perform their
duties. Petitio actionis and other documents may be accepted.
2.Marriages and private worship may be celebrated.
3.Contiones may be called and celebrated. Citizens may express their
will, but any vote conducted will not be binding for the
magistrates.
4.Markets may be open, business may be made, contracts may be
signed. Private activities may take place normally.
II. Dies COMITIALES (C): These are identical to dies fasti, but they
are reserved for the celebration of public assemblies.
1.If no magistrate calls any of the Comitia on a dies comitialis, it
shall be treated as a dies fastus.
2.If a magistrate calls the Comitia, then a vote may take place. The
result of such a vote would be binding for the magistrates.
III. Dies NEFASTI (N): They are dies profesti (working days) that
present some restrictions due to their religious character.
1.Tribunals may be open and petitiones actionis and other documents
may be accepted. However, the praetores cannot pass a sentence
(because they cannot say the words do, dico, addico).
2.Public worship has preference over private worship. It is not
recommended to celebrate marriages.
3.Comitia should not be called. Contiones may be called to inform
the People, but no voting should take place. The Senate may meet,
but affairs concerning cultus and religio should be dealt with
before any civil affair in the Senate agenda.
4.Private activities are not favoured. It is not recommended to
begin a journey or to sign contracts, or to generally start a new
activity. Should an action have begun on a previous day, however, it
might be carried on normally. Markets may be open.
IV. Dies ENDOTERCISI vel INTERCISI (EN): These are "cut asunder"
days, that prepare the feria of the following day. They are dies
profesti (working days) with certain restrictions. They are dies
nefasti in the morning (horae I to IIII) before and during the
celebration of the sacrifices; but they become dies fasti at noon
(horae V to VIII) and nefasti again in the evening (horae VIIII to
XII) during and after the offering in the altars of the sacrifices
performed in the morning.
V. Dies NEFASTI PVBLICI (NP): A dies nefastus publicus is a dies
festus, a holiday for all citizens (not for slaves), because they
are reserved for public worship and dedicated to a given god
(feriae). All the NP days are feriae publicae pro populo, but not
all dies feriati are NP. They have the same characteristics as a
dies nefastus, but tribunals are closed (because magistrates have to
attend public religious ceremonies). These include fixed holidays
(feriae stativae), mobile holidays (feriae conceptivae) decreed by
magistrates and irregular holidays (feriae imperativae) decreed by
the Senate.
VI. Dies FASTI PVBLICI vel FASTI PVRI (FP): The meaning of this
fastus is not yet completely clear. Further research is necessary,
and the pontifices will one day issue a new responsum concerning
this particular fastus. For the moment being, the pontifices
recommend to treat these days as if they were NEFASTI PVBLICI.
VII. Quando Rex Comitiavit Fas (QRCF): These are fixed days (dies
fissi) in the calendar, and they are also dies feriati (religious
workship takes place) but dies profesti (working days). They are a
dies nefastus from dawn till the Rex Sacrorum appears in the
Comitium and performs the purifying rites. From then on it is a dies
fastus and the Comitia may be adjourned.
VIII. Quando Stercus Delatum Fas (QSTDF or QSDF): These are fixed
days (dies fissi) in the calendar, and they are also dies feriati
(religious workship takes place) but dies profesti (working days).
They are a dies nefastus from dawn till the vestales finish cleaning
the Temple and the House of Vesta and take the garbage out of the
sacred grounds through the Porta Stercolaria. Garbage is then swept
down the streets and thrown to the Tiber. From that moment onwards,
it is a dies fastus.
IX. Dies ATRI: These are "dark" days in which fire should not be
lit* and sacrifices should not be offered in altars. Temples should
not celebrate public worship. All religious ceremonies are private
but without sacrifices. Making journeys, starting new projects, or
doing anything risky should be avoided, and certain gods, including
Juppiter and Janus, may not be named. They are always dies fastus
(F) or dies comitialis (C), never dies nefastus (N) or dies nefastus
publicus (NP). The dies atri include two special subcategories:
1.Dies POSTRIDUANI: These are the days after all the Kalendae, Nonae
and Idus of each month. They are, in general terms, dies fasti (F),
but they are days of bad omens for beginning private activities,
business or journeys. Public worship is explicitly forbidden.
2.Dies VITIOSI: These are specific dates decreed by the Senate,
considered unlucky days on which some disaster for Rome had
occurred. The only two fixed dies vitiosi are the dies ALIENSIS, on
July the 18th, commemorating the defeat on the Allia river and the
sack of Rome by the Gauls, and August the 2nd, a. d. IV Nonae
Sextiliae, which is the traditional anniversary of the Battle of
Cannae. These days must be declared dies atri through a
senatusconsultum.
X. Dies RELIGIOSI: These are days dedicated to the worship of
infernal** deities and of the dead; worship to celestial deities
should not take place, and temples of celestial deities should close
their doors. All ceremonies are private and celebrated in domestic
shrines by the pater familias. These are always a dies nefastus (N),
never a dies fastus (F), dies comitiales (C) or dies nefastus
publicus (NP).
XI. Special dates for marriages Marriages should not to be performed
during the periods of 13-21 February, 1-20 March, throughout the
month of May, or during 5-15 June, nor were they to be performed on
days when the mundus was opened (24 August, 5 October, and 8
November) and should be discouraged on those dates that dies
Postriduani, dies Vitiosi, or dies ater. These dates specifically
refer to the rite of confarreatio as some are periods when the
Flamen and Flaminca Dialis would not have been available to attend,
as required, while others concern feriae for the Manes. Although not
proscribed in regard to other forms of marriages, they were still
considered ill-omened days on which to marry.

22 Iunius 2759

*M. Moravius and I recently corresponded on this particular point.
I disagreed with the original proposal by Gn. Salix Astur Pontifex &
proposed that it actually meant that no new fire could be kindled
(by fire drill, flint & steel, etc.) or a dead fire re-kindled, but
a flame could be taken from a burning lamp or candle and/or coals
taken from a focus to light another since the fire had been made
before the dies ater. The CP welcomes any scholarly input on this
subject with proper documentation. FGA.

**chthonic or underworld Gods; such as Ops, Tellus, Dis, Robiligus.

Vale.

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, GAIVS IVLIANVS <ivlianvs309@...>
wrote:

Salvete Omnes! I remember reading some where that the term "Dies
Religiosus" was an alternate term for Dies Ater the unlucky day
after the Kalendae, Nonae and Idus. Is this termology correct?! Many
years ago I remember seeing it used in a Roman calendar used by the
M.T.R. in Italia! Does anyone have any info on these two terms?
Gratias vobis ago! Valete! Gaivs Ivlianvs
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53319 From: Titus Flavius Aquila Date: 2007-12-07
Subject: AW: [Nova-Roma] Re: Real temples
Titus Flavius Aquila Marco Moravi Piscino Consul designatus salutem plurimam dicit

Salve Piscinus,

thank you very much for the elaborate explanations. I think we do agree in the final goal, it is just the way how to reach this goal
where we might slightly differ.

I am absolutely convinced that we need to get out of the virtual world into the real world. We need to be seen as
Nova Roma , our Religio must find a center where we can honour and worship our Gods.This center will need to be in Rome or
at least nearby.The Nova Roman people long for a temple , a spiritual center to worship the Roman Gods in public rites as
the mighty gods deserve it.

I agree with all of your statements concerning finding the right place for a templum, but we have one major advantage compared
to our ancestors, the temples are already existing,our ancestors already made the move and built temples. So we just need to
tie in and build our temple. We do not need to start where our ancestors started 2760 years ago, we can tie in where they have
been 2000 years ago.

In providing an temple/templum to the Romans worldwide, Nova Roma will gain compliment and recognition as the leader in romanitas.

Saturnalia is coming soon , lets give the Nova Roman citizens a sign of hope that Nova Roma , the magistrates , the senate and the
people will work closely together to reach our vision, A Temple for the Gods in Rome !

Vale optime
Titus Flavius Aquila
Scriba Censoris KFBM
Tribunus Plebis designatus


Heute schon einen Blick in die Zukunft von E-Mails wagen? www.yahoo.de/mail

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53320 From: Maxima Valeria Messallina Date: 2007-12-07
Subject: Re: Vesta statue
Salve,

Equitius Marinus is very correct. Everything I have read about the worship of Vesta by the Romans substantiates that Vesta was never represented by a statue, although it was said that Augustus kept a statue of her in his own private residence. The Vestals taught that Vesta was present in her sacred flame in the hearth in the Temple of Vesta and that she alone of all the Gods and Goddesses could not be represented in cold marble or any other material. I am not saying you can not have a statue of her. I just want to allay any fears of lighting a fire without possessing a statue of Vesta, for She is present in the flame. May I suggest that you light the fire in her honor and ask her to protect your fire. I think you will find She is quite amenable.

Vale bene in pace Deorum,

Maxima Valeria Messallina
Sacerdos Vestalis

"Nihil apud Romanos Templo Vestae sanctius habetur."
"Among the Romans nothing is held more holy than the Temple of Vesta."





Gnaeus Equitius Marinus <gawne@...> wrote:
bill segura <bhsegura@...> writes:

> T A Germanicus
> A bit off topic, I recently moved. During my move I broke my
> statue of Vesta. I have not been able to find a suitable
> replacement. Can anyone tell me where I can find one? Does anyone
> know the origin of the donkey that is associated with her?
> My wife will not let me light a fire in the fireplace without her.

For Vesta with Pales the donkey, see
http://www.sacredsource.com/prodinfo.asp?number=VSP

For some other representations of Vesta, check out
http://www.goddessgift.net/page27.html

It's worth noting that the Romans in antiquity never represented Vesta
anthromorphically. She was always represented by the sacred flame in
her temple.

Vale,

CN-EQVIT-MARINVS





---------------------------------
Looking for last minute shopping deals? Find them fast with Yahoo! Search.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53321 From: Maior Date: 2007-12-07
Subject: Re: Real temples
M. Hortensia Tito Flavio Sex. Lucilio Marco Moravioque Consul
designatus salutem plurimam dicit

Salvete Aquila, Piscine et Tutor;
I am for both! domestic rites and a big temple. I think a
problem may be a Europe-Americas perception

In Rome, Gallia, Dacia, Germania, there are existing Roman temples
that the city/state owns, that the cultores could ask to use. It
happens in Greece with YSEE.

Of course no such thing exists in the Americas, North and South. At
the same time the Americas have many wonderful wild places of
grandeur, perfect places for worship.

This isn't the case in many places in Europe. There is a limited
amount of land which is owned and heavily cultivated. Land is
expensive, people don't have large backyards... There are few wild
places, and they may be very far away.

So different regions of Nova Roma have different capacities and
needs. There is room for both!

bene valete in pacem deorum
Marca Hortensia Maior


> thank you very much for the elaborate explanations. I think we do
agree in the final goal, it is just the way how to reach this goal
> where we might slightly differ.
>
> I am absolutely convinced that we need to get out of the virtual
world into the real world. We need to be seen as
> Nova Roma , our Religio must find a center where we can honour and
worship our Gods.This center will need to be in Rome or
> at least nearby.The Nova Roman people long for a temple , a
spiritual center to worship the Roman Gods in public rites as
> the mighty gods deserve it.
>
> I agree with all of your statements concerning finding the right
place for a templum, but we have one major advantage compared
> to our ancestors, the temples are already existing,our ancestors
already made the move and built temples. So we just need to
> tie in and build our temple. We do not need to start where our
ancestors started 2760 years ago, we can tie in where they have
> been 2000 years ago.
>
> In providing an temple/templum to the Romans worldwide, Nova Roma
will gain compliment and recognition as the leader in romanitas.
>
> Saturnalia is coming soon , lets give the Nova Roman citizens a
sign of hope that Nova Roma , the magistrates , the senate and the
> people will work closely together to reach our vision, A Temple
for the Gods in Rome !
>
> Vale optime
> Titus Flavius Aquila
> Scriba Censoris KFBM
> Tribunus Plebis designatus
>
>
> Heute schon einen Blick in die Zukunft von E-Mails wagen?
www.yahoo.de/mail
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53322 From: L�AVR�SEVERVS Date: 2007-12-07
Subject: Announcement of Candidacy
Salvete Omnes,

I stand before you as a candidate for the office of Custos for 2761 AVC.

This is the first time I have sought publicly elected office in Nova Roma.

I have been a citizen since Ian. 2756 AVC (January 2003 C.E.), and am an assiduus.

I have served Nova Roma as a Scriba Propraetoris, Procurator, and most recently as Legatus Pro Praetore of Canada Orientalis (since Nov. 2759 AVC). I have asked the Senate to prorogue me in this capacity.

I am interested in the election process of Nova Roma. I have been a citizen for nearly 5 years and still do not have a complete understanding of how magistrates are elected. I resolve to serve Nova Roma with enthusiasm as I learn about the inner workings of elections.

If elected, I ask that the Custos-elect assist me as I learn the ropes.

I ask for your support. May peace be with you.

Valete,

Lucius Aurelius Severus



---------------------------------
Looking for last minute shopping deals? Find them fast with Yahoo! Search.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53323 From: M. Lucretius Agricola Date: 2007-12-07
Subject: Re: Oath of office in Latin (template)
--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "A. Tullia Scholastica"
<fororom@...> wrote:
>
> > A. Tullia Scholastica C. Petronio Dextro quiritibus, sociis,
peregrinisque
> > omnibus S.P.D.
> >
> >

> > Albucius is very busy right now, but would have liked to have had
> > assistance with uploading his translations of our laws when he had
more time.


Really? He has, inter alia, uploaded the following images and created
or edited the following pages. The total number of accumulated edits
this year is in the hundreds, as is shown on the associated history
pages.

There is no record of his asking for assistance on the wikimagisters'
page or on the NRWiki list.

When he had more time, he did the work listed below. It is a partial list.

http://www.novaroma.org/nr/Image:Gallia_drapeau.jpg
http://www.novaroma.org/nr/Image:Drapfr.jpg
http://www.novaroma.org/nr/Image:Drned.jpg
http://www.novaroma.org/nr/Image:Drlat.jpg
http://www.novaroma.org/nr/Image:Galliamap.jpg
http://www.novaroma.org/nr/Image:Quirites_home.jpg
http://www.novaroma.org/nr/Image:Quirinus_home.jpg
http://www.novaroma.org/nr/Image:Eagle.jpg
http://www.novaroma.org/nr/Image:BAS.jpg
http://www.novaroma.org/nr/Image:Three_generations_of_citizens.JPG

http://www.novaroma.org/nr/Provincia_Gallia_%28Nova_Roma%29
http://www.novaroma.org/nr/Provincia_Gallia_-_Citizens_%28Nova_Roma%29
http://www.novaroma.org/nr/FR:Provincia_Gallia_%28Nova_Roma%29
http://www.novaroma.org/nr/LA:Provincia_Gallia_%28Nova_Roma%29
http://www.novaroma.org/nr/FR:Provincia_Gallia_-_Citizens_%28Nova_Roma%29
http://www.novaroma.org/nr/FR:Provincia_Gallia_-_Organization_%28Nova_Roma%29
http://www.novaroma.org/nr/FR:Provincia_Gallia_-_Government_%28Nova_Roma%29
http://www.novaroma.org/nr/FR:Provincia_Gallia_-_Edits_-_En_vigueur_-_59-42_%28Nova_Roma%29
http://www.novaroma.org/nr/FR:Provincia_Gallia_-_Edits_-_En_vigueur_-_59-41_%28Nova_Roma%29
http://www.novaroma.org/nr/FR:Provincia_Gallia_-_Edits_-_En_vigueur_-_59-40_%28Nova_Roma%29
http://www.novaroma.org/nr/FR:Provincia_Gallia_-_Edits_-_En_vigueur_-_59-39_%28Nova_Roma%29
http://www.novaroma.org/nr/FR:Provincia_Gallia_-_Edits_-_En_vigueur_-_59-38_%28Nova_Roma%29
http://www.novaroma.org/nr/FR:Provincia_Gallia_-_Tabularium_Galliae_%28Nova_Roma%29
http://www.novaroma.org/nr/FR:Provincia_Gallia_-_Edits
http://www.novaroma.org/nr/FR:Provincia_Gallia_-_Droit_provincial_%28Nova_Roma%29
http://www.novaroma.org/nr/FR:Provincia_Gallia_-_Edits_-_En_vigueur_-_59-43_%28Nova_Roma%29
http://www.novaroma.org/nr/Provincia_Gallia_-_Government_%28Nova_Roma%29_-_GAR_-_2760
http://www.novaroma.org/nr/FR:Provincia_Gallia_-_Government_%28Nova_Roma%29_-_GAR_-_2760
http://www.novaroma.org/nr/Provincia_Gallia_-_Archives_-_Homepage_-_-_Sept07_-_%28Nova_Roma%29
http://www.novaroma.org/nr/Provincia_Gallia_-_Archives_-_Homepage_-_Sept07_-_%28Nova_Roma%29
http://www.novaroma.org/nr/Provincia_Gallia_-_Archives_-_Homepage_-_Oct07_-_%28Nova_Roma%29
http://www.novaroma.org/nr/FR:Provincia_Gallia_-_Archives_-_Homepage_-_Sept07_-_%28Nova_Roma%29
http://www.novaroma.org/nr/FR:Provincia_Gallia_-_Archives_-_Homepage_-_Oct07_-_%28Nova_Roma%29
http://www.novaroma.org/nr/Provincia_Gallia_-_Communities_%28Nova_Roma%29
http://www.novaroma.org/nr/Provincia_Gallia_-_Events_%28Nova_Roma%29
http://www.novaroma.org/nr/FR:Provincia_Gallia_-_Archives_%28Nova_Roma%29
http://www.novaroma.org/nr/Provincia_Gallia_-_Government_%28Nova_Roma%29
http://www.novaroma.org/nr/Provincia_Gallia_-_Archives_%28Nova_Roma%29
http://www.novaroma.org/nr/Provincia_Gallia_-_Archives_-_Homepage_-_%28Nova_Roma%29
http://www.novaroma.org/nr/FR:Provincia_Gallia_-_Archives_-_Homepage_-_%28Nova_Roma%29
http://www.novaroma.org/nr/Provincia_Gallia_-_History_%28Nova_Roma%29
http://www.novaroma.org/nr/Provincia_Gallia_-_Links_%28Nova_Roma%29
http://www.novaroma.org/nr/Provincia_Gallia_-_Praetorium_%28Nova_Roma%29
http://www.novaroma.org/nr/Provincia_Gallia_-_Magistrates_%28Nova_Roma%29
http://www.novaroma.org/nr/Provincia_Gallia_-_Projects_%28Nova_Roma%29




Agricola
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53324 From: marius.lupus Date: 2007-12-07
Subject: Re: Real temples
Gaius Marius Lupus Tito Flavi Aquilae Scribae Censoris Tribunoque
Plebis salutem pluriman dicit.

Salve Aquila,

I am just very new to NR - however I want to tell you that I fully
agree with you about the construction of a temple. I also believe that
the creation of "local" small shrines should be encouraged.
When old pagan temples are not available due to the presence of
churches built on the ruins, or due to archeological restrictions, Nova
Roma could build nova templa, also very simple ones. This is a signal
of the new energy of the old religion.

Ave atque vale

C.Marius Lupus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53325 From: M. Lucretius Agricola Date: 2007-12-07
Subject: Re: Dies Religiosus verses Dies Ater?
Salve!

Hoc lege: http://www.novaroma.org/nr/Roman_calendar

Optime vale!

Agricola

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, GAIVS IVLIANVS <ivlianvs309@...> wrote:
>
> Salvete Omnes! I remember reading some where that the
> term "Dies Religiosus" was an alternate term for Dies
> Ater the unlucky day after the Kalendae, Nonae and
> Idus. Is this termology correct?! Many years ago I
> remember seeing it used in a Roman calendar used by
> the M.T.R. in Italia! Does anyone have any info on
> these two terms? Gratias vobis ago! Valete! Gaivs Ivlianvs
>
>
>
____________________________________________________________________________________
> Never miss a thing. Make Yahoo your home page.
> http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53326 From: M. Lucretius Agricola Date: 2007-12-07
Subject: Re: Real temples !--No, real rites and offerings.
Agricola Piscino Omnibusque sal.

I want to confirm that what you said about "the millions of Japanese
who every day offer countless acts of worship at small shrines by the
roadside..." is quite literally true.

At the university where I teach we have a small shrine next to the
front of the main office building, set back from the path and in a
sort of grove, but visible as one walks to the main door. Many times
have I seen colleagues walking up the path, when they come to the
point in front of the shrine, stop, stand erect and make a bow. It
takes more time to read than to do.

Often I have seen small coins left on statue bases, for example the
shrine guardian statues, or other places. These offerings remain
untouched until collected by the shrine workers because there is the
recognition here that they are pro sacro, to use our term.

Optime vale, amice, et valete!




--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "marcushoratius" <mhoratius@...> wrote:
>
> Salve mi Agricola
>
> Exactly!
>
> Many people think of the religio Romana in terms of how it has been
> presented by Hollywood and the movie industries in other countries.
> Well, there is much to be said for the pomp that attended the sacra
> publica of the Roman State. Such displays were only part of the
> religio Romana, and I would say only a very small part of the religio
> Romana. When the Emperor of Japan goes forth on parade in full
> regalia to visit a shrine and offer worship to his divine ancestors
> this is comparable to the public displays that were once seen in
> imperial Rome. And then there are the millions of Japanese who every
> day offer countless acts of worship at small shrines by the roadside,
> near trees, in their back yards or in their homes or in cemetaries,
> and there are the thousands who each day visit the many shrines and
> temples found in the islands of Japan. All that is part of their
> religion as well. Imperial spectacle is fine, but as far as
> importance, it means little, ultimately, than the gesture of one man
> when taken out of the context of millions of worshippers who join
> with him every day.
>
> In my mind Shintoism may be the closest religion seen in the modern
> world to what can be compared to the religio Romana. As far as
> practices, one can find closer parallels in Hinduism. But you find
> in Shintoism a worship of the ancestors that I think is closer to
> Roman ideas. And there are the many lesser deities of Nature, and
> also the spirits of travellers, or ghosts if you will - the Manes who
> are remembered in those isles. There are spirits warded off by the
> sound of drums and gongs, by the laughter of festivals, by the
> lighting of candles in the dark. There are spirits whose presence are
> invoked by the sound of the flute and the graceful movement of
> dance. Then also are the greater Gods and Goddesses of the sea, and
> of the earth, of the stars and of the sky above. There is nothing in
> the Shintoism of Japan that would seem unfamiliar to a Roman.
>
> As much as I too enjoy the spectacle of a pompa, it is the simple and
> sincere worship offered by Numa Pompilius, directly between the man
> and Egeria, or directly between Faunus and Numa, and between Numa and
> Jupiter, with which I identify the religio Romana. Its simplest and
> purest form. Everything else was decoration for the benefit of the
> masses. But without that interconnection between the individual and
> the divine in Nature there was no real religio Romana. Going through
> rituals, murmuring Latin phrases that you don't really understand, is
> just superstitio. Before all else, the foundation for our religious
> tradition - whether we see it in terms of an individual or of a
> community - has got to be the discovery, recognition, interconnection
> of ourselves in the divine. Then, maybe, the Gods will once more
> walk among us.
>
> Ten days from now we will celebrate Saturnalia. We celebrate that
> Golden Era when the Gods walked among us, when the Gods were a part
> of our society, visited our homes daily. It is a time of peace when
> we recommit ourselves to bringing the Gods back into our lives and
> into our hearts. Fitting, too, Hanukkah has begun already this year,
> with our Jewish sisters and brothers remembering their ancestors and
> the roots of their religious tradition. And soon to follow our
> Christian brothers and sisters will celebrate their holidays of this
> season as well. Peace on earth, peace among men and women of good
> will, peace among the sons and daughters of Quirinus, the
> grandchildren of Mars. the great grandchildren of Jupiter, and the
> generations of Saturnus.
>
> Io Saturnalia! Io triumphe!
> Annum Novum faustum felicem tibi, mi Agricola
>
> M Moravius Piscinus
>
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "M. Lucretius Agricola"
> <wm_hogue@> wrote:
> >
> > Agricola Piscino sal.
> >
> > You speak rightly. The feeling that you mention leads people to do
> > this, for example. http://www.flickr.com/photos/agricola/1036241256/
> >
> > optime vale!
> >
> >
> > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "marcushoratius" <mhoratius@>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > Salve mi Sexte Lucili
> > >
> > > "In ancient times (today's) temples began as sacred precincts,
> first
> > > set off and solemnized by augures, then at length they were
> > > consecrated by the pontifices, and finally temples were erected
> on
> > > them." ~ Servius, Ad Aeneis 1.446
> > >
> > >
> > > Something to consider is that our ancestors did not randomly
> choose to
> > > erect temples in just any locations. Noster Stoicus wrote:
> > >
> > > "Have you ever come upon a grove thick with venerable trees which
> > > tower above the ordinary height and by their layers of
> intertwined
> > > branches dim the light of Heaven? The loftiness of the forest,
> its
> > > quiet seclusion, the marvel of thick and unbroken shade in
> untrammeled
> > > space will impart to you a conviction of the divine." ~ Seneca,
> > > Epistula 41.3
> > >
> > > I would say that one has to hear the Gods calling, has to "feel"
> Their
> > > presence, intuit Their calling to you, and experience Them in a
> > > locus. That is where one should offer worship. Such a place
> should
> > > be set off, as a locus, its boundaries marked off by stones,
> perhaps
> > > with ribbons hung between the trees to encircle its perimeters;
> the
> > > augures erecting the templum through auspicia to sanctify the
> place.
> > > Then over time, through continues use, the locus may be made into
> a
> > > fanum, with a permanent altar, an enclosing wall, and a column on
> > > which would be an image of the God or Goddess for whom the place
> is
> > > dedicated. then some day a small aedes can be built, as a
> sacullum,
> > > and the deity invoked to send down His or Her numen to inhabit
> the
> > > place. But before we make any such plans to construct edifices,
> we
> > > must do as our ancestors and find the presence of the divine
> first.
> > >
> > > Mi Stoicus Sexte, where did Seneca advise Lucilius in that
> epistle to
> > > look for the divine?
> > >
> > > Vale et vade in pace Deorum
> > >
> > > M Moravius Piscinus
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Svm Stoicus" <phorus@> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Salve!
> > > >
> > > > My opinion is that time is directing to build the Temple. Who
> has
> > > sensibility can see what happen around us. I think that Gods
> speak to
> > > us but who can notices them call?
> > > >
> > > > Vale
> > > >
> > > > Sextus Lucilius Tutor
> > > >
> > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53327 From: A. Apollonius Cordus Date: 2007-12-07
Subject: De sententiis meis
A. Apollonius omnibus sal.

Hello.

I've been busy for a little while, and have just finished catching up with events in this forum. I must confess that I have not read every word of the nearly 30 digests I have just read, but I have noticed a few things I'd like to respond to, so this will be the first of a small flurry of messages from me, after which I shall go quiet again, though perhaps not for quite so long.

My friend M. Hortensia mentioned that I had once said something to her about plebiscita and "the constitution". One or two others have asked about this. I'm sorry to say that I cannot remember what she is talking about. I have, in my short life so far, said many, many things!

So I must say with regret that I am unable to explain what i meant. If, however, she can find the text of what I wrote, I am quite content for it to be published here, for it is my general rule to try not to say anything in private which I would not be prepared to face up to in public.

Alternatively, if anyone wishes to ask me specific questions about specific issues, I am quite happy to tell you what I think now, even if I cannot remember what I used to think before.




___________________________________________________________
Support the World Aids Awareness campaign this month with Yahoo! For Good http://uk.promotions.yahoo.com/forgood/
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53328 From: A. Apollonius Cordus Date: 2007-12-07
Subject: Re: Magistratuum munera convenientiaque petitorum
A. Apollonius A. Tulliae sal.

>> ATS2: Corde, you rebuked me more than once, if I recall correctly,
for
>> moving from the rogatura to the praetura, but have said nothing
about moving
>> from the aedilitas to the censura.

I have said plenty about it. I have said it again and again. I said it in the very message to which this is your reply. I have said it in general terms, and I have said in in specific terms. I do not believe anyone who has read anything I have written on this subject in the last couple of months would have the least difficulty in telling what I think about someone standing for the censura without holding the praetura or the consulatus.

My fellow citizens, I invite and indeed implore you to write privately to A. Tullia and tell her whether or not I consider it acceptable for anyone to skip any step on the cursus honorum. Evidently when I tell her myself she experiences a strange lapse in her ordinarily formidable powers of comprehension.



__________________________________________________________
Sent from Yahoo! Mail - a smarter inbox http://uk.mail.yahoo.com
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53329 From: A. Apollonius Cordus Date: 2007-12-07
Subject: De edicto censorio
A. Apollonius omnibus sal.

I would like to applaud the censores for doing something which is done far too rarely in Nova Roma. They have looked beyond our written leges (without disobeying them) and done what the Romans did.

The rank of princeps senatus is not mentioned in the lex constitutiva. It is not mentioned in any lex. Not only has it never been established by a senatus consultum, but in fact a senatus consultum was once enacted specifically rejecting its creation. For these reasons, many people have said over the years that there could not be a princeps senatus.

The censores have proved those people wrong. The fact that something is not mentioned by any written legal text does not mean that it does not exist. Such an idea is totally alien to the Roman way of thinking. Of course the rank of princeps senatus exists. It existed in the ancient Roman republic, and nothing in our written law abolishes it, so of course it exists.

And in the ancient republic it was in the power of the censores, and no one else, to choose the princeps senatus. They needed no one's authority or approval. They had the power merely by virtue of being censores. And, for the same reason, the censores of Nova Roma have always had the power to choose the princeps senatus. They have simply never used it. Our censores have used it, and in doing so they have reminded us of something very important.

They have reminded us of this:

We can usually behave in a Roman way without needing to create new leges authorizing or commanding one another to do so. We can usually behave in a Roman way without fear of being criticized for exceeding our legal powers or duties. To make things happen, it is usually enough for a magistrate to go ahead and do whatever he would have done in the old republic.

I'm rather sad that I have to say "usually". I should not have to say "usually". There should not be times when we need written law to make us behave like Romans. There should not be times when our own written law prevents us from doing what Romans should do.

Let us hope that our new magistrates will follow this example set by the censores, and let us hope that it will not be too long before I can repeat that paragraph without the word "usually".




__________________________________________________________
Sent from Yahoo! Mail - a smarter inbox http://uk.mail.yahoo.com
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53330 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2007-12-07
Subject: Away from the keyboard until Sunday evening
Salvete omnes,

I'm about to depart for a weekend trip and I won't have routine
computer access until Sunday evening. May Concordia watch over you all.

Valete,

CN-EQVIT-MARINVS
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53331 From: A. Apollonius Cordus Date: 2007-12-07
Subject: De dictatoribus senatusque consultis ultimis
A. Apollonius omnibus sal.

There seems to be total agreement that the appointment of a dictator is "worse" than the enactment of the senatus consultum ultimum. I find this worrying.

I would hope that any Roman, surveying the broad sweep of Roman republican history, would come quickly to the conclusion that the dictatura is a far more benign and time-honoured institution than the senatus consultum ultimum. Let me explain why.

Dictatores are known from the very early republic. Their appointment was almost routine. They were appointed in two types of circumstance: when there was a need for someone with consular power but neither consul was available, and when there was a need for a single individual to exercise the powers of both consules together. The dictator was the solution to both these problems because he was simply and straightforwardly what both those cases demand: two consules combined in one person. He had, in most important respects, no more and no less power than that.

Creating a dictator did not give that person the power to overthrow or to overhaul the state. It simply removed one of the traditional constraints on consular power, namely collegiality. This constraint was, however, replaced with a different one, namely a halving of the term of office. A dictator had twice the power of a consul but for half the length of time. It is, in essence, that simple.

And that is why the appointment of a dictator was almost routine. It was not taken lightly, to be sure, but it was nonetheless one among a number of problem-solving tools in the constitutional tool-box. It was often used to solve problems as mundane as the need to hold an election when no consul was available in Rome. It was used frequently and without mishap right up until the second Punic war, when idiots tried to add the constraint of collegiality - whose absence was its only real virtue - to it. This made it completely useless, and thereafter it was not used. But it is important to notice that it was abandoned not because it was too powerful and dangerous but, on the contrary, because it was no longer powerful enough: it had been made into nothing more than an unelected consulate, and therefore a dictator was no more useful than a consul.

By contrast, the senatus consultum ultimum had no long and beneficent pedigree. It was created in the late republic. It was created in times of civil disorder and perpetuated in times of civil war. Its legality was never fully accepted by the Roman people. It was regarded by both its supporters and its opponents as a mechanism for legalizing the otherwise illegal summary execution of Roman citizens without trial. It was never used for any other purpose.

So why, I ask myself, do I see lots of people accepting without question that the dictatura and the senatus consultum ultimum are both nasty and dangerous things, and that the dictatura is the worse of the pair? It is because of ignorance. But not the ignorance of the people who say these things. The ignorance of those who have made these things true.

Because when I hear people talking in this forum about the dictatura and the senatus consultum ultimum, they are talking about institutions which have almost nothing to do with ancient Rome. They are talking about constructs created less than ten years ago by the drafters of our current lex constitutiva.

In our lex constitutiva, the dictator has the power to overrule leges and to create new leges without the approval of the comitia. No dictator in Roman history ever had this power. It has no historical foundation whatsoever.

In our lex constitutiva, the senatus consultum ultimum gives the consules the power to overrule whatever leges they like for as long as they like. Even the most ardent supporter of the senatus consultum ultimum in the old republic, such as M. Tullius, would never have claimed that it had such broad effect. At most, they would have said that the consultum gave the consules the power to use lethal force to suppress imminent or actual civil disorder and to protect the republic. A very large portion of the population, probably a majority, would not even have accepted this much and would have regarded the whole institution as entirely illegal.

To have these things in our political system, when the Romans never had them in these forms, is simply ridiculous. The nearest we ever come to civil disorder is a few people saying nasty things to each other in e-mails. Our republic has no physical institutions and is therefore almost impossible to destroy or even seriously to damage. Why on earth, then, do we need these 'emergency provisions' which are far, far more sweeping, oppressive, and undemocratic than the ancient Romans, who lived in real fear of riots in the streets and massacre by invading barbarians, ever had? It is utterly ludicrous.

The senatus consultum ultimum should be expunged entirely from our leges and from our political lexicon. The dictatura should be restored to its proper historical footing. And certainly, *certainly*, neither of them should under any circumstances be used in their current form.




___________________________________________________________
Support the World Aids Awareness campaign this month with Yahoo! For Good http://uk.promotions.yahoo.com/forgood/
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53332 From: A. Apollonius Cordus Date: 2007-12-07
Subject: De religione
A. Apollonius omnibus sal.

I was very interested to read C. Julius' recent thoughts on improving the institutions and the vitality of the sacra Romana in our community. I noticed particularly his urging that we concentrate on encouraging and cultivating the sacra privata.

This reminded me of something I have thought from time to time but have not, as far as I know, got round to saying before. I think there is something which would enormously improve the sacral and indeed the general life of the community, if it could be done.

To explain what I have in mind, let me just talk a little about the word "religio". There is a lot of misunderstanding about this word. It looks a lot like the English word "religion", the French word "religion", the Spanish word "religion", and the Italian word "religione", which all mean roughly the same thing. They do not mean the same thing as the Latin word "religio". Oh no, they do not. Not at all.

Look at the ending of the word: "-io". It's quite a common Latin ending. Look at some of the other words which end like that. I'll pick some at random from my little yellow dictionary:

"Demolitio" - the act or activity of tearing something down.
"Exspectatio" - the state or activity of waiting for something.
"Promissio" - the act or activity of promising.
"Monstratio" - the act or activity of showing something.
"Permixtio" - the state or activity of being mixed up or confused.
"Editio" - the act or activity of publishing something.
"Exploratio" - the act or activity of investigating or exploring.
"Deleriatio" - the state or activity of being mad.

Notice a theme? They are all activities or states of being. They are things to do, or things to be.

The very same is true of "religio". It is an activity or a state of being. It is not an institution, or a belief, or a set of beliefs, or anything which we understand by the modern word "religion". It is not the right word to describe the collection of beliefs, rituals, ideas, stories, institutions, buildings, &c. which we might think of as "the Roman religion".

But it is still something very important: a very important activity or state of being. It is the activity of carefully and diligently and earnestly performing the rituals and observances which ones is required by the gods, or by ancestral tradition, or by plain common sense to perform. It is the state of being in awe and reverence and amazement and devotion to the gods.

Religio is what C. Julius wants to foster and encourage in private individuals and private households with their sacra privata. That is certainly an excellent thing with which no one could wish to argue. But religio can also be alive in a whole community, and was certainly alive in the old Roman res publica.

Others may disagree, but I do not think that one need actually "believe" in the gods to feel and to display religio. I am not sure that the question of belief or non-belief is a very Roman question to ask. Some Romans thought of the gods as literal, anthropomorphic beings who could walk and talk and fight and have sex. Some Romans thought of the gods as nebulous natural or supernatural forces. Some Romans thought of the gods as manifestations of a single Platonic truth. Some Romans thought of the gods as socially useful constructs. Many probably thought more than one of these things simultaneously. Which of them believed and which disbelieved? If ten people say they believe in Juppiter but each one gives a different answer to the question "and what is Juppiter, then?", can we say that they all believe in the same thing, or in the same way? Maybe, maybe not. But I think an ancient Roman would have thought all these views perfectly compatible
with religio. And remember, religio could also mean a state of healthy fear of the gods, so even a Christian (for example) who regards the Roman gods as demons can perhaps be said to display a certain sort of religio.

How can a community come to be collectively in awe and reverence and amazement and fear of the gods? I think a substantial contribution comes from emotional attachment to things and activities associated with the gods. I think of the magnificent Easter processions of Catholic southern Europe, which members of the community join or at least watch from an age when they are too young even to understand what they are all about, and which often inspire excitement, or nostalgia in them even if they grow up to reject the theological principles espoused by their organizers. I think of the Muslim pilgrimage to Mecca and the Hindu practice of bathing in the mud of the Ganga, both activities which are performed individually by separate people but which form great collective physical affirmations of shared tradition and culture. I think of the great works of religious art in all modern traditions which inspire us with awe and admiration and make us think,
"whether I believe this or not, it is clearly something which demands respect". I think of millions of people putting up Christmas trees, lighting oil lamps for Diwali or candles for Hanukkah, giving each other presents for Eid or Chinese New Year. Aren't these the things which make communities value their religious traditions and regard their gods with awe and amazement?

And these are things which the Romans did with great gusto. They were masters of holiday-making. In the name of the gods they had ceremonies of marvellous solemnity and dignity, they had colourful and noisy processions, they had games and plays and music and dancing, they made magnificent art and architecture, they gave and received presents, and they did all manner of bizarre and ridiculous things whose origins were lost in the mists of time. No wonder they had religio.

I don't particularly "believe" in the Roman gods, or in any gods, and I don't particularly want to. But, my goodness, I would love to see Nova Roma doing all those things for them. Wouldn't it be marvellous? And if people like me were constantly exposed to the sights, sounds, and smells of the worship of the gods going on all around us and forming part of the daily life of our community, would anyone really be afraid that we would want to destroy it all simply because we think that the gods themselves probably don't exist? And if our children grew up amidst those sights and sounds and smells, joining in the processions and exchanging the gifts and going to the plays and singing the songs and making the sacrifices, would we even need to ask whether they believed in the gods? They would have religio, and that would be a fine, fine thing.

I suppose someone will burst my bubble now by pointing out that these things cost money and in any case can't be done without gathering substantial numbers of people together in the same place. Yeah, I know. But it's an aspiration worth having, even if we can't at the moment think how to make it happen. It's something for us to keep in the backs of our minds; and perhaps from time to time one of us will have a bright idea about how to do some little thing here or there which will bring a little bit more religio into the life of our community.

That's all from me for now. See you in a week or two.




___________________________________________________________
Support the World Aids Awareness campaign this month with Yahoo! For Good http://uk.promotions.yahoo.com/forgood/
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53333 From: pompeia_minucia_tiberia Date: 2007-12-07
Subject: Re: De religione
---
Salve A. Apollonius Cordus, Salvete Omnes:

You wrote:



And remember, religio could also mean a state of healthy fear of
the gods, so even a Christian (for example) who regards the Roman gods
as demons
can perhaps be said to display a certain sort of religio.

Pompeia: Perhaps you are speaking of Strict Christian fundamentalists
who might regard the Roman Gods, or anyone else's perception of the
divine, as demons. At least this is the way I interpret your words,
because I can't imagine for a moment, Corde, that you would be tarring
all Christians by the same brush. Fundamentalists of any religious
persuasion are around, no doubt...but unlikely to be in Nova Roma, so
I am not sure this aspect of your otherwise insightful discussion
applies to our res publica.

Valete
Pompeia
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53334 From: marcushoratius Date: 2007-12-07
Subject: a. d. VI Eidus Decembris
M. Moravius Piscinus Horatianus Quiritibus et omnibus salutem
plurimam dicit: Sanctus velit vos inesse.

Hodie est ante diem VI Eidus Decembris; haec dies comitialis est:
Gaiae; Tiberno in Insula.

"The names of Acca Larentia and Gaia Taracia, or Fufetia as she is
sometimes called, are frequent in the early annals. To the former of
these after her death, but to Taracia while she still lived, the
Roman people paid distinguished honors. And that Taracia, at any
rate, was a Vestal Virgin is proved by the lex Horatia that was laid
before the people with regard to her. By this law very many honors
are bestowed on her and among them the right of giving testimony is
granted her, and that privilege is given to no other woman in the
state. The word testabilis is used in the lex Horatia itself, and
its opposite occurs in the Twelve Tablets, 'Let him be infamous and
intestibilis, or forbidden to testify.' Besides, if at the age of
forty she should wish to leave the priesthood and marry, the right
and privilege of withdrawing from the order and marrying were allowed
her, in gratitude for her generosity and kindness in presenting to
the people the campus Tiberinus, or Campus Martius as it was later
called." ~ Geliius, Noctes Atticae 7.7.1-4


AUC 363 / 390 BCE

Following the Gallic sack of the City, Camillus, "as a man of great
religious sensibility, was to bring before the Senate matters related
to the immortal Gods; the following decree was the result: all
shrines were to be rebuilt, marked with boundary stones and purified
because they had been in enemy hands, the method of purification was
to be sought in the Sibylline Oracles by the duumviri sacris
faciundis (Livy 5.50)." The rest of the City was built
haphazardly. "Roof tiles were supplied at public expense, while
those who pledged to finish construction within a year's time were
allowed to take wood and stone from wherever they could find them.
The haste with which they worked resulted in an irregular street
plan, as they built over the empty areas without attention to the
exact boundaries between their own land and other's property. This is
the reason why the old sewer system, which originally followed its
course through public lands, now passes in many places beneath
private dwellings, and the result is a city that resembles one built
piecemeal rather than laid out according to a master plan." ~ Titus
Livius 5.55

What else happened in their haste to rebuild the City is that the
Romans removed all the debris and threw it into the Tibur River.
This is said to have created a logjam on which silt then deposited to
form the Insula. It was some time in the second century then that a
Temple was erected for Tiburnus on the Insula.

Our thought for today is from Epictetus' Enchiridion 45

"Does any one bathe hastily? Do not say that he does it ill, but
hastily. Does any one drink much wine? Do not say that he does ill,
but that he drinks a great deal. For unless you perfectly understand
his motives, how should you know if he acts ill? Thus you will not
risk yielding to any appearances but such as you fully comprehend."
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53335 From: marcushoratius Date: 2007-12-07
Subject: Re: De religione
Salvete omnes

Alas, some quotations come in handy all too often.

"The superstitious man fears the Gods, the religious man reveres Them
as he would his parents, for They are good, more apt to forgive than
punish." ~ M. Terentius Varro, Frag 47 Card.

Di Deaeque vos bene ament
Piscinus


--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "pompeia_minucia_tiberia"
<pompeia_minucia_tiberia@...> wrote:
>
> ---
> Salve A. Apollonius Cordus, Salvete Omnes:
>
> You wrote:
>
>
>
> And remember, religio could also mean a state of healthy fear of
> the gods, so even a Christian (for example) who regards the Roman
gods
> as demons
> can perhaps be said to display a certain sort of religio.
>
> Pompeia: Perhaps you are speaking of Strict Christian
fundamentalists
> who might regard the Roman Gods, or anyone else's perception of the
> divine, as demons. At least this is the way I interpret your words,
> because I can't imagine for a moment, Corde, that you would be
tarring
> all Christians by the same brush. Fundamentalists of any religious
> persuasion are around, no doubt...but unlikely to be in Nova Roma,
so
> I am not sure this aspect of your otherwise insightful discussion
> applies to our res publica.
>
> Valete
> Pompeia
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53336 From: Gaius Petronius Dexter Date: 2007-12-08
Subject: Re: Real temples
G. Petronius Dexter M. Hortensiae Maiori S.P.D.

> In Rome, Gallia, Dacia, Germania, there are existing Roman temples
> that the city/state owns, that the cultores could ask to use. It
> happens in Greece with YSEE.

In France Gallo-roman temples and Gallic menhirs are now historic
monuments and Catholic Church would not accept, and certainly State,
that these temples become again holly places of cult. In France we do
not have legal representants of pagan cults. They are some druids but
all people think them gentle dreamers...

In France we are lay people and religions are separated with state
but state definied religions and only accepted the 3 monotheisms
(judaism, christianity and islamism) all the others are sects or
sectarian movements and, of course, forbidden by the laws. Buddhism
is more a philosophy than a religion.

> Of course no such thing exists in the Americas, North and South. At
> the same time the Americas have many wonderful wild places of
> grandeur, perfect places for worship.

In the Americas you have the magnificent pyramids of Mexico and
marvelous temples of Peru... but these deities were not Roman. And in
North American do not you have some holly trees ? or sacred places
for Indian cults ? I do not believe... all men, and Indian too, had
places for Gods. Perhaps in New York you have a very old and ancient
place of a misterious divinity... Hollywood is not an holly wood ?

Cura ut valeas.

G.Dexter
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53337 From: Q. Caecilius Metellus Date: 2007-12-08
Subject: Re: De religione
Q. Caecilius Metellus Pompeiae Minuciae Straboni salutem.

>> And remember, religio could also mean a state of healthy fear of the gods,
>> so even a Christian (for example) who regards the Roman gods as demons can
>> perhaps be said to display a certain sort of religio.
>
> Pompeia: Perhaps you are speaking of Strict Christian fundamentalists who
> might regard the Roman Gods, or anyone else's perception of the divine, as
> demons. At least this is the way I interpret your words, because I can't
> imagine for a moment, Corde, that you would be tarring all Christians by the
> same brush. Fundamentalists of any religious persuasion are around, no
> doubt...but unlikely to be in Nova Roma, so I am not sure this aspect of your
> otherwise insightful discussion applies to our res publica.

Of course, I'm not my good friend Cordus, so I can't speak for him. However,
when I read that same stretch of finely written text, I gathered something
different as to what was meant by the statement. Your interpretation, on
reading it, isn't unreasonable, certainly; I just came to a different thought.

As I read it, I took Cordus as saying the even *a* Christian (not anyone in
particular) who regards Roman deities as demons could "display a certain
religio", in that such a person could naturally fear them (as, perhaps, some
Christians fear Satan).

I'm naturally not certain if my interpretation is correct, or if what you stated
is correct, or what exactly is the correct interpretation of Cordus' statement,
but I just put it out there as another way to read things.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53338 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2007-12-08
Subject: Re: Real temples
Cato C. Petronio Dextero sal.

Salve.

Interstingly enough, there is not a single recorded instance of any
kind of ancient religious sacred space on the island of Manhattan.
The local tribes simply used to fish and trade here, but apparently
didn't worship here in any kind of way that was noticed or remarked
upon by themselves, their neighbors, or the European settlers who
arrived here.

It is often remarked than New York City (or New Amsterdam, originally)
is the only major city on the Eastern seaboard of the United States
that was *not* founded by a group with religious or political
motivation. From its earliest incarnation it existed solely as a
point of commerce.

Vale,

Cato

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Gaius Petronius Dexter"
<jfarnoud94@...> wrote:
>
> G. Petronius Dexter M. Hortensiae Maiori S.P.D.
>
> > In Rome, Gallia, Dacia, Germania, there are existing Roman temples
> > that the city/state owns, that the cultores could ask to use. It
> > happens in Greece with YSEE.
>
> In France Gallo-roman temples and Gallic menhirs are now historic
> monuments and Catholic Church would not accept, and certainly State,
> that these temples become again holly places of cult. In France we do
> not have legal representants of pagan cults. They are some druids but
> all people think them gentle dreamers...
>
> In France we are lay people and religions are separated with state
> but state definied religions and only accepted the 3 monotheisms
> (judaism, christianity and islamism) all the others are sects or
> sectarian movements and, of course, forbidden by the laws. Buddhism
> is more a philosophy than a religion.
>
> > Of course no such thing exists in the Americas, North and South. At
> > the same time the Americas have many wonderful wild places of
> > grandeur, perfect places for worship.
>
> In the Americas you have the magnificent pyramids of Mexico and
> marvelous temples of Peru... but these deities were not Roman. And in
> North American do not you have some holly trees ? or sacred places
> for Indian cults ? I do not believe... all men, and Indian too, had
> places for Gods. Perhaps in New York you have a very old and ancient
> place of a misterious divinity... Hollywood is not an holly wood ?
>
> Cura ut valeas.
>
> G.Dexter
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53339 From: pompeia_minucia_tiberia Date: 2007-12-08
Subject: Re: De religione
---Salve Metellus Pontifex, Salvete Omnes:

Without prejudice:
A careful reading, Metelle, with respect, of my response to Cordus
would suggest that you and I are clearly on the *same page* ,to coin a
phrase.

Vale optime (and you know this as you are very dear to me regardless
of any circumstance)

Pompeia






In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Q. Caecilius Metellus"
<postumianus@...> wrote:
>
> Q. Caecilius Metellus Pompeiae Minuciae Straboni salutem.
>
> >> And remember, religio could also mean a state of healthy fear of
the gods,
> >> so even a Christian (for example) who regards the Roman gods as
demons can
> >> perhaps be said to display a certain sort of religio.
> >
> > Pompeia: Perhaps you are speaking of Strict Christian
fundamentalists who
> > might regard the Roman Gods, or anyone else's perception of the
divine, as
> > demons. At least this is the way I interpret your words, because I
can't
> > imagine for a moment, Corde, that you would be tarring all
Christians by the
> > same brush. Fundamentalists of any religious persuasion are around, no
> > doubt...but unlikely to be in Nova Roma, so I am not sure this
aspect of your
> > otherwise insightful discussion applies to our res publica.
>
> Of course, I'm not my good friend Cordus, so I can't speak for him.
However,
> when I read that same stretch of finely written text, I gathered
something
> different as to what was meant by the statement. Your
interpretation, on
> reading it, isn't unreasonable, certainly; I just came to a
different thought.
>
> As I read it, I took Cordus as saying the even *a* Christian (not
anyone in
> particular) who regards Roman deities as demons could "display a
certain
> religio", in that such a person could naturally fear them (as,
perhaps, some
> Christians fear Satan).
>
> I'm naturally not certain if my interpretation is correct, or if
what you stated
> is correct, or what exactly is the correct interpretation of Cordus'
statement,
> but I just put it out there as another way to read things.
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53340 From: C. Curius Saturninus Date: 2007-12-08
Subject: Re: Digest Number 3710
Salvete,

My little green book (a Latin grammar by T. Pekkanen) tells about
word forming in Latin that:

-forms ending -tio / -sio (both with long o) are substantives that
are derived from verbs and that they are expressions of abstract
action or state of being
-for example:
invenire (to invent) -> inventio (invention)
scribo, scripsi, scriptum (to write) -> scriptio (writing)
possideo, -sedi, -sessum (to own) -> possessio (possession)

Looking at the examples Cordus gave, those all are either -tio or -
sio words, but I'm too little of linguist to say if religio is also
of the same group. Perhaps if someone has Allen's Vox Latina, he/she
could see if there are common changes with t or s wich would produce
g as a result.

Valete,


On 8.12.2007, at 12:00, Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com wrote:

> 1a. De religione
> Posted by: "A. Apollonius Cordus"
> a_apollonius_cordus@... a_apollonius_cordus
> Date: Fri Dec 7, 2007 6:23 pm ((PST))
>
> To explain what I have in mind, let me just talk a little about the
> word "religio". There is a lot of misunderstanding about this
> word. It looks a lot like the English word "religion", the French
> word "religion", the Spanish word "religion", and the Italian word
> "religione", which all mean roughly the same thing. They do not
> mean the same thing as the Latin word "religio". Oh no, they do
> not. Not at all.
>
> Look at the ending of the word: "-io". It's quite a common Latin
> ending. Look at some of the other words which end like that. I'll
> pick some at random from my little yellow dictionary:
>
> "Demolitio" - the act or activity of tearing something down.
> "Exspectatio" - the state or activity of waiting for something.
> "Promissio" - the act or activity of promising.
> "Monstratio" - the act or activity of showing something.
> "Permixtio" - the state or activity of being mixed up or confused.
> "Editio" - the act or activity of publishing something.
> "Exploratio" - the act or activity of investigating or exploring.
> "Deleriatio" - the state or activity of being mad.
>
> Notice a theme? They are all activities or states of being. They
> are things to do, or things to be.
>
> The very same is true of "religio". It is an activity or a state
> of being. It is not an institution, or a belief, or a set of
> beliefs, or anything which we understand by the modern word
> "religion". It is not the right word to describe the collection of
> beliefs, rituals, ideas, stories, institutions, buildings, &c.
> which we might think of as "the Roman religion".


C. Curius Saturninus
(Mikko Sillanpää)

Senator - Aedilis Plebis - Propraetor Provinciae Thules
Rector Academia Thules ad Studia Romana Antiqua et Nova

e-mail: c.curius@...
www.academiathules.org
thule.novaroma.org
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53341 From: GAIVS IVLIANVS Date: 2007-12-08
Subject: Re: Dies Religiosus verses Dies Ater?
Salvete Omnes! Okay with this discussion, well WHEN do
the Dies Religiosi occur?! I understand that no
private rites are to be performed at ones Lararium?!
Is this the same as well on Dies Atri?! Valete! Gaivs
Ivlianvs
--- "M. Lucretius Agricola" <wm_hogue@...>
wrote:

> Salve!
>
> Hoc lege: http://www.novaroma.org/nr/Roman_calendar
>
> Optime vale!
>
> Agricola
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, GAIVS IVLIANVS
> <ivlianvs309@...> wrote:
> >
> > Salvete Omnes! I remember reading some where that
> the
> > term "Dies Religiosus" was an alternate term for
> Dies
> > Ater the unlucky day after the Kalendae, Nonae and
> > Idus. Is this termology correct?! Many years ago I
> > remember seeing it used in a Roman calendar used
> by
> > the M.T.R. in Italia! Does anyone have any info
> on
> > these two terms? Gratias vobis ago! Valete! Gaivs
> Ivlianvs
> >
> >
> >
>
____________________________________________________________________________________
> > Never miss a thing. Make Yahoo your home page.
> > http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs
> >
>
>
>



____________________________________________________________________________________
Be a better friend, newshound, and
know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now. http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53342 From: GAIVS IVLIANVS Date: 2007-12-08
Subject: Which type of Pileus is worn at Saturnalia?!
Salvete Omnes! Does anyone happen to know WHICH type
of the Roman red Pileus was worn at the Saturnalia by
everyone?! Was it the Phrygian type, or the egg shape
pointed one?! Or were both worn according to ones
preference? And was it RED in color? I have read that
when a slave was freed the Pileus was undyed and made
of felt. Valete! Gaivs Ivlianvs


____________________________________________________________________________________
Looking for last minute shopping deals?
Find them fast with Yahoo! Search. http://tools.search.yahoo.com/newsearch/category.php?category=shopping
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53343 From: Maior Date: 2007-12-08
Subject: Re: Real temples
Maior Catoni Dexteroque sal;
It' quite interesting. I lived in Manhattan for many years & when
you mentioned this, I immediately thought of the great Hudson river,
which at one time had been teeming with fish and wildlife. YOu need
a shamanic point of view. That's all.

The local Indians Mahicans & Lenape belonged to the Iroquois
Confederacy.

http://nationalhumanitiescenter.org/tserve/eighteen/ekeyinfo/natcult.
htm
or click here: http://tinyurl.com/yqb6re

[In the Iroquois theogony] there seem to have been three classes of
supernatural phenomena: spirits, ghosts of the dead, and the gods.
In addition there was a Great Spirit, together with his satanic
counterpart.

. Special wintertime feasts were held for the ghosts, who were
thought to participate unseen in the dancing and the games; they
also accompanied raiding parties, even though they could only watch
and not fight.

Peter Farb, Man's Rise to Civilization as Shown by the Indians of
North America from Primeval Times to the Coming of the Industrial
State (New York: Dutton, 1968), 107.



> Salve.
>
> Interstingly enough, there is not a single recorded instance of any
> kind of ancient religious sacred space on the island of Manhattan.
> The local tribes simply used to fish and trade here, but apparently
> didn't worship here in any kind of way that was noticed or remarked
> upon by themselves, their neighbors, or the European settlers who
> arrived here.
>
> It is often remarked than New York City (or New Amsterdam,
originally)
> is the only major city on the Eastern seaboard of the United States
> that was *not* founded by a group with religious or political
> motivation. From its earliest incarnation it existed solely as a
> point of commerce.
>
> Vale,
>
> Cato
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Gaius Petronius Dexter"
> <jfarnoud94@> wrote:
> >
> > G. Petronius Dexter M. Hortensiae Maiori S.P.D.
> >
> > > In Rome, Gallia, Dacia, Germania, there are existing Roman
temples
> > > that the city/state owns, that the cultores could ask to use.
It
> > > happens in Greece with YSEE.
> >
> > In France Gallo-roman temples and Gallic menhirs are now
historic
> > monuments and Catholic Church would not accept, and certainly
State,
> > that these temples become again holly places of cult. In France
we do
> > not have legal representants of pagan cults. They are some
druids but
> > all people think them gentle dreamers...
> >
> > In France we are lay people and religions are separated with
state
> > but state definied religions and only accepted the 3 monotheisms
> > (judaism, christianity and islamism) all the others are sects or
> > sectarian movements and, of course, forbidden by the laws.
Buddhism
> > is more a philosophy than a religion.
> >
> > > Of course no such thing exists in the Americas, North and
South. At
> > > the same time the Americas have many wonderful wild places of
> > > grandeur, perfect places for worship.
> >
> > In the Americas you have the magnificent pyramids of Mexico and
> > marvelous temples of Peru... but these deities were not Roman.
And in
> > North American do not you have some holly trees ? or sacred
places
> > for Indian cults ? I do not believe... all men, and Indian too,
had
> > places for Gods. Perhaps in New York you have a very old and
ancient
> > place of a misterious divinity... Hollywood is not an holly
wood ?
> >
> > Cura ut valeas.
> >
> > G.Dexter
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53344 From: GAIVS IVLIANVS Date: 2007-12-08
Subject: Wearing the Pileus at Saturnalia Survey!
Salvete Romani et Omnes! I'm conducting a little
survey to ask how many Romani out there will be
wearing the Pileus for the 7 days of the
Saturnalia???!!! I certainly plan on doing so and on
the first day of the Saturnalia at my meal time for
Cena I will also wear the Synthesis! The Eidus and the
Saturnalia are rapidly approaching us and I indeed
hope that our citizens and Romani in Italia will be
with me in reviving this delightful custom and wear
the Red Pileus as part of their celebration!!! Bene
Valete! Frater Gaivs Ivlivs Ivlianvs, PGI


____________________________________________________________________________________
Never miss a thing. Make Yahoo your home page.
http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53345 From: Gens Iulia Date: 2007-12-08
Subject: Re: Real temples - Petronius Dexter and Horatius
Salve Gaius Petronius!:
It's been a LONG TIME since I had the chance of writing in French (or Italian, for all that matters) so every time I try another language, English comes out. I hope I'll be able to make some sense of it.
You are quite right about sacred places in South America (as well as some other places in Amerique du Nord, like Mexico). Those Deities are something completely different from the Roman ones, although They still make their presence be felt. I'm not quite sure whether it has something to do with shamanic practices, or rather with a "egregoric" (borrowing the word from Chaos Magic) kind of "energy" (for lack of a better explanation). Still, as I have discussed many times in other forums, we, European descendants born in a foreign land, might have a rough time when connecting to other beliefs but the ones supported by mainstrean society.
Local spirits, somehow, are still alive. Take the Pachamama worship, still celebrated in most of South America on August 1st, every single year.
But also our own ancestors' Deities can express their voices, through our blood and lineage. And finding a suitable place for local worship, like Moravius Piscinus has so wonderfully expressed it, in his mail sent on December 7th, might not be so difficult, if one actually strives to connect with each specific Deity.
Here, in Buenos Aires, we have a wonderful Botanical Garden, built during the late 1800's. Many "foreigner" species from Europe were brought, including an oak whic must be at least 100 years old. This old Oak has become our "private" altar, no matter how many strange looks we, my husband and I, might get when pouring ale and bits of grain bread whenever we can.
There is another point, which comes to politics. Here, as an example, we have a Ministery of Foreign Affairs and Cult, which regulates each religion or branch which is allowed to build temples and perform rituals. So far, as Gaius Petronius has expressed, Pagan/non Patriarchal-Monotheist religions, are not allowed publicly. Not, at least, until they might gather a significant number of members and dutifully register at the aforesaid Ministery.
So, the main question might be, what can we actually do to be acknowledged as a bona fide religion in each country?. How Nova Roma, as an organization, might eventually help towards this goal?.
Valete!!
Gaia Iulia Agrippa.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Gaius Petronius Dexter" <jfarnoud94@...>
To: <Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Saturday, December 08, 2007 2:11 AM
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Real temples


> G. Petronius Dexter M. Hortensiae Maiori S.P.D.
>
> > In Rome, Gallia, Dacia, Germania, there are existing Roman temples
> > that the city/state owns, that the cultores could ask to use. It
> > happens in Greece with YSEE.
>
> In France Gallo-roman temples and Gallic menhirs are now historic
> monuments and Catholic Church would not accept, and certainly State,
> that these temples become again holly places of cult. In France we do
> not have legal representants of pagan cults. They are some druids but
> all people think them gentle dreamers...
>
> In France we are lay people and religions are separated with state
> but state definied religions and only accepted the 3 monotheisms
> (judaism, christianity and islamism) all the others are sects or
> sectarian movements and, of course, forbidden by the laws. Buddhism
> is more a philosophy than a religion.
>
> > Of course no such thing exists in the Americas, North and South. At
> > the same time the Americas have many wonderful wild places of
> > grandeur, perfect places for worship.
>
> In the Americas you have the magnificent pyramids of Mexico and
> marvelous temples of Peru... but these deities were not Roman. And in
> North American do not you have some holly trees ? or sacred places
> for Indian cults ? I do not believe... all men, and Indian too, had
> places for Gods. Perhaps in New York you have a very old and ancient
> place of a misterious divinity... Hollywood is not an holly wood ?
>
> Cura ut valeas.
>
> G.Dexter
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.16.17/1178 - Release Date: 08/12/07 11:59 a.m.
>
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53346 From: M. Lucretius Agricola Date: 2007-12-08
Subject: Re: Dies Religiosus verses Dies Ater?
Salve!

Follow the "calendar" link on the main page to:
http://www.novaroma.org/nr/Fasti_MMDCCLX

Optime vale!

Agricola

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, GAIVS IVLIANVS <ivlianvs309@...> wrote:
>
> Salvete Omnes! Okay with this discussion, well WHEN do
> the Dies Religiosi occur?! I understand that no
> private rites are to be performed at ones Lararium?!
> Is this the same as well on Dies Atri?! Valete! Gaivs
> Ivlianvs
> --- "M. Lucretius Agricola" <wm_hogue@...>
> wrote:
>
> > Salve!
> >
> > Hoc lege: http://www.novaroma.org/nr/Roman_calendar
> >
> > Optime vale!
> >
> > Agricola
> >
> > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, GAIVS IVLIANVS
> > <ivlianvs309@> wrote:
> > >
> > > Salvete Omnes! I remember reading some where that
> > the
> > > term "Dies Religiosus" was an alternate term for
> > Dies
> > > Ater the unlucky day after the Kalendae, Nonae and
> > > Idus. Is this termology correct?! Many years ago I
> > > remember seeing it used in a Roman calendar used
> > by
> > > the M.T.R. in Italia! Does anyone have any info
> > on
> > > these two terms? Gratias vobis ago! Valete! Gaivs
> > Ivlianvs
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
>
____________________________________________________________________________________
> > > Never miss a thing. Make Yahoo your home page.
> > > http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs
> > >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
____________________________________________________________________________________
> Be a better friend, newshound, and
> know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now.
http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53347 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2007-12-08
Subject: Re: Real temples
Cato M. Hortensiae Maiori sal.

Salvete.

I think the Hudson still teems with wildlife and what might generously
be considered "fish" in that they're mostly scaly and probably have
several fins...it's the multiple heads that throw people off :-)

I didn't mean that NYC could not be considered some kind of sacred
space, but that there is no evidence - written, physical, or in any
local oral tradition - that marks any place on the island as having
any kind of historical spiritual importance. There is evidence of
habitation and importance as a commercial focal point - primarily for
sewant, or wampum - since Paleolithic times, but nothing else.

The inhabitants when the Dutch showed up, the Manhattoes Indians, used
Inwood Park as a hunting ground, so I guess that might be considered
special in some way, but apparently they weren't very good at hunting.

Vale,

Cato
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53348 From: liviacases Date: 2007-12-08
Subject: Re: De religione
L. Livia Plauta Apolloni et omnibus sal.

I'm sorry to have disappeared from this list for a while. It's a busy
period for me and and after my trip I was overwhelmed by the deluge
of messages, so that I barely had time to read, but not to respond.

But I want to thank Apollonius Cordus, because he expressed the main
reason why I joined Nova Roma, but worded it a thousand times better
than I would have been able to (quote below).

I will certainly try to do all I can to make this happen.



Apollonius Cordus scripsit:
(start quote)
> And these are things which the Romans did with great gusto. They
were masters of holiday-making. In the name of the gods they had
ceremonies of marvellous solemnity and dignity, they had colourful
and noisy processions, they had games and plays and music and
dancing, they made magnificent art and architecture, they gave and
received presents, and they did all manner of bizarre and ridiculous
things whose origins were lost in the mists of time. No wonder they
had religio.
>
> I don't particularly "believe" in the Roman gods, or in any gods,
and I don't particularly want to. But, my goodness, I would love to
see Nova Roma doing all those things for them. Wouldn't it be
marvellous? And if people like me were constantly exposed to the
sights, sounds, and smells of the worship of the gods going on all
around us and forming part of the daily life of our community, would
anyone really be afraid that we would want to destroy it all simply
because we think that the gods themselves probably don't exist? And
if our children grew up amidst those sights and sounds and smells,
joining in the processions and exchanging the gifts and going to the
plays and singing the songs and making the sacrifices, would we even
need to ask whether they believed in the gods? They would have
religio, and that would be a fine, fine thing.
>
(end quote)

Valete omnes!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53349 From: Maior Date: 2007-12-08
Subject: Re: Real temples - Petronius Dexter and Horatius
Salvete Gaia Iulia et Gai Petroni:
it's wonderful to hear about practices in Buenos Aires, thank you:)
Are there many many groups in Argentina? I agree with you the best
way is to start forming a pan-pagan organization, for with numbers
you get representation.

In Europe I've watched the Greek Polytheists, YSEE, in Greece work
via court rulings, for official recognition.
http://www.ysee.gr/index-eng.php

There is EU law to help them and it would help the Gallic cultores
as well. Dexter, if you want to, join up with the Druids and form a
pan-pagan French group and talk with YSEE.

On the other hand if you don't have a passion for organizing. Find a
less famous Roman temple and have ceremonies there or in a sacred
wood if there are any left in Brittany with the Druids.

If they mention Rome in a bad way, tell them we didn't destroy the
Druids;-). Hibernia (where I lived) and Alba were Druid strongholds
with no Romans & there are none today, sadly.
bene valete in pacem deorum
Marca Hortensia Maior

> Here, in Buenos Aires, we have a wonderful Botanical Garden, built
during the late 1800's. Many "foreigner" species from Europe were
brought, including an oak whic must be at least 100 years old. This
old Oak has become our "private" altar, no matter how many strange
looks we, my husband and I, might get when pouring ale and bits of
grain bread whenever we can.

> So, the main question might be, what can we actually do to be
acknowledged as a bona fide religion in each country?. How Nova
Roma, as an organization, might eventually help towards this goal?.
> Valete!!
> Gaia Iulia Agrippa.
>
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53350 From: Adriano Rota Date: 2007-12-08
Subject: Re: Wearing the Pileus at Saturnalia Survey!
Salve,

please help me waht is the Pileus and the Synthesis. It sounds interesting .


Thank You Adriano Rota


----- Original Message ----
From: GAIVS IVLIANVS <ivlianvs309@...>
To: nova-roma@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Saturday, December 8, 2007 1:25:54 PM
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Wearing the Pileus at Saturnalia Survey!

Salvete Romani et Omnes! I'm conducting a little
survey to ask how many Romani out there will be
wearing the Pileus for the 7 days of the
Saturnalia?? ?!!! I certainly plan on doing so and on
the first day of the Saturnalia at my meal time for
Cena I will also wear the Synthesis! The Eidus and the
Saturnalia are rapidly approaching us and I indeed
hope that our citizens and Romani in Italia will be
with me in reviving this delightful custom and wear
the Red Pileus as part of their celebration! !! Bene
Valete! Frater Gaivs Ivlivs Ivlianvs, PGI

____________ _________ _________ _________ _________ _________ _
Never miss a thing. Make Yahoo your home page.
http://www.yahoo com/r/hs





____________________________________________________________________________________
Looking for last minute shopping deals?
Find them fast with Yahoo! Search. http://tools.search.yahoo.com/newsearch/category.php?category=shopping

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53351 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2007-12-08
Subject: Re: Wearing the Pileus at Saturnalia Survey!
Cato Adriano Rotae sal.

Salvete.

"PILEUS, The pileus (plural, pilei), also pilleus or pilleum, was, in
Ancient Greece and Rome, a brimless, felt cap, somewhat similar to a
fez. (The pilleolus was a smaller cap, similar to a skullcap.) It was
especially associated with manumitted slaves which wore it upon
liberation. The pileus became emblematic, especially popular in the
18th and 19th Centuries (when it was often called a "liberty cap" or
Phrygian cap), of liberty and freedom from bondage, appearing on
statuary and on heraldic devices." - Wikipedia

"SYNTHESIS, a garment frequently worn at dinner, and sometimes also on
other occasions. As it was inconvenient to wear the toga at table on
account of its many folds, it was customary to have dresses especially
appropriated to this purpose, called vestes coenatoriae, or coenatoria
(Mart. X.87.12, xiv.135; Petr. 21), accubitoria (Petr. 30), or
Syntheses. The Synthesis is commonly explained to be a loose kind of
robe, like the Pallium; but Becker (Gallus, vol. I p37) supposes from
a comparison of a passage of Dion Cass. (lxiii.13) with one of
Suetonius (Ner. 51) describing the dress of Nero, that it must have
been a kind of tunic, an indumentum rather than an amictus [Amictus].
That it was, however, an easy and comfortable kind of dress, as we
would say, seems to be evident from its use at table above mentioned,
and also from its being worn by all classes at the Saturnalia, a
season of universal relaxation and enjoyment (Mart. XIV.1, 141,
vi.24). More than this respecting its form we cannot say; it was
usually dyed with some colour (Mart. ii.46, x.29), and was not white
like the toga." - Smith's Dictionary

Vale,

Cato
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53352 From: marcushoratius Date: 2007-12-08
Subject: a. d. V Eidus Decembris
M. Moravius Piscinus Horatianus Quiritibus et omnibus salutem
plurimam dicit: Di vos inculumes custodiant

Hodie est ante diem V Eidus Decembris; haec dies comitialis est:
Mesonyctium

For the Mesonyctium, a loose and rather modernistic interpretation of
a portion of Carmen LXIII by Catullus pertaining to this Vigil of
Attis.

For the entire translation visit
http://rudy.negenborn.net/catullus/text2/e63.htm


"And here before we start, before you all I'll prove my mother-love,
I'll tear my own balls off for MOTHER DEATH, for MOTHER DEATH"
So down he bent, and with the sharpened blade of a bayonet
Sliced out his tree of life, root and all.
Attis brayed like an electrocuted mule,
Attis bled like a slit-throated bull,
Then watched his brothers emulate.

Men no more, trailing dark red rivulets,
In which the strangest stalks took root,
They charged as one mad rushing troop
Into the forest's deeper gloom
On and up towards the mother lair, the mountaintop.
All night they trampled down the ferns,
All night they scrambled over rocks,
All night they tore past thorns and grizzled bark,
All night they hollered, sang and screamed,
Banged out tunes with hollowed shins on tambourines,
Till their lungs were raw and quit
And their amphetamine insanity was spent.
Then tripping up and staggering round
Like squads of wet-brain, park-bench drunks,
They fell to earth, and took the land of nod.


Our thought for today is taken from Seneca, Epistle 41:

"If you see a man who is not terrified in the midst of dangers,
untouched by desires, happy in adversity, peaceful amid the storm,
who looks down upon men from a higher plane, and views the Gods on a
footing of equality, will not a feeling of reverence for him steal
over you, will you not say: 'This quality is too great and too lofty
to be regarded as resembling this petty body in which it dwells? A
divine power has descended upon that man'."
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53353 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2007-12-09
Subject: Re: Digest Number 3710
>
> A. Tullia Scholastica C. Curio Saturnino quiritibus, sociis, peregrinisque
> bonae voluntatis S.P.D.
>
>
> Salvete,
>
> My little green book (a Latin grammar by T. Pekkanen) tells about
> word forming in Latin that:
>
> -forms ending -tio / -sio (both with long o) are substantives that
> are derived from verbs and that they are expressions of abstract
> action or state of being
> -for example:
> invenire (to invent) -> inventio (invention)
> scribo, scripsi, scriptum (to write) -> scriptio (writing)
> possideo, -sedi, -sessum (to own) -> possessio (possession)
>
> Looking at the examples Cordus gave, those all are either -tio or -
> sio words, but I'm too little of linguist to say if religio is also
> of the same group. Perhaps if someone has Allen's Vox Latina, he/she
> could see if there are common changes with t or s wich would produce
> g as a result.
>
> ATS: The OLD says religio is from ligare, [strengthened to religare, to
> tie, to restrain, etc.], or from legere, select, read. The g is therefore
> part of the root, not the abstract noun termination. The ending ­io is
> another of the abstract noun endings, just as in legio from legere and regio
> from regere. -Tio is also in this group, the source of the English suffix
> ­tion.
>
> Valete,
>
> On 8.12.2007, at 12:00, Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> <mailto:Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com> wrote:
>
>> > 1a. De religione
>> > Posted by: "A. Apollonius Cordus"
>> > a_apollonius_cordus@... <mailto:a_apollonius_cordus%40yahoo.co.uk>
>> a_apollonius_cordus
>> > Date: Fri Dec 7, 2007 6:23 pm ((PST))
>> >
>> > To explain what I have in mind, let me just talk a little about the
>> > word "religio". There is a lot of misunderstanding about this
>> > word. It looks a lot like the English word "religion", the French
>> > word "religion", the Spanish word "religion", and the Italian word
>> > "religione", which all mean roughly the same thing. They do not
>> > mean the same thing as the Latin word "religio". Oh no, they do
>> > not. Not at all.
>> >
>> > Look at the ending of the word: "-io". It's quite a common Latin
>> > ending. Look at some of the other words which end like that. I'll
>> > pick some at random from my little yellow dictionary:
>> >
>> > "Demolitio" - the act or activity of tearing something down.
>> > "Exspectatio" - the state or activity of waiting for something.
>> > "Promissio" - the act or activity of promising.
>> > "Monstratio" - the act or activity of showing something.
>> > "Permixtio" - the state or activity of being mixed up or confused.
>> > "Editio" - the act or activity of publishing something.
>> > "Exploratio" - the act or activity of investigating or exploring.
>> > "Deleriatio" - the state or activity of being mad.
>> >
>> > Notice a theme? They are all activities or states of being. They
>> > are things to do, or things to be.
>> >
>> > The very same is true of "religio". It is an activity or a state
>> > of being. It is not an institution, or a belief, or a set of
>> > beliefs, or anything which we understand by the modern word
>> > "religion". It is not the right word to describe the collection of
>> > beliefs, rituals, ideas, stories, institutions, buildings, &c.
>> > which we might think of as "the Roman religion".
>
> C. Curius Saturninus
> (Mikko Sillanpää)
>
> Senator - Aedilis Plebis - Propraetor Provinciae Thules
> Rector Academia Thules ad Studia Romana Antiqua et Nova
>
> e-mail: c.curius@... <mailto:c.curius%40academiathules.org>
> www.academiathules.org
> thule.novaroma.org
>
> Vale, et valete.
>
>
>
>
>



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53354 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2007-12-09
Subject: a.s. II diem Natalem Christi
OSD C. Equitius Cato

Salvete omnes!

Hodie est ante septimanem II diem natalem Christi.


O Radix Jesse, qui stas in signum populorum, super quem continebunt
reges os suum, quem Gentes deprecabuntur: veni ad liberandum nos, jam
noli tardare. (O Root of Jesse, which standest for an ensign of the
people, at Whom the kings shall shut their mouths, Whom the Gentiles
shall seek, come to deliver us, do not tarry.)

"And there shall come forth a rod out of the root of Jesse, and a
flower shall rise up out of his root." - Isaiah 11:1


O Clavis David, et sceptrum domus Israel; qui aperis, et nemo claudit;
claudis, et nemo aperit: veni, et educ vinctum de domo carceris,
sedentem in tenebris, et umbra mortis. (O Key of David, and Sceptre
of the house of Israel, that openeth and no man shutteth, and shutteth
and no man openeth, come to liberate the prisoner from the prison, and
them that sit in darkness, and in the shadow of death.)

"And I will lay the key of the house of David upon his shoulder: and
he shall open, and none shall shut: and he shall shut, and none shall
open." - Isaiah 22:22


In mense autem sexto missus est angelus Gabrihel a Deo in civitatem
Galilaeae cui nomen Nazareth ad virginem desponsatam viro cui nomen
erat Ioseph de domo David et nomen virginis Maria. Et ingressus
angelus ad eam dixit ave gratia plena Dominus tecum benedicta tu in
mulieribus. Quae cum vidisset turbata est in sermone eius et
cogitabat qualis esset ista salutatio. Et ait angelus ei ne timeas
Maria invenisti enim gratiam apud Deum. Ecce concipies in utero et
paries filium et vocabis nomen eius Iesum.


Valete bene in expectio Christi!

Cato
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53355 From: marcushoratius Date: 2007-12-09
Subject: Terra Mater
M Moravius Piscinus carissimae amicae salutem plurimam dicit:

Et te, Terra, precor leviter super ossa residas, sentiat ut pietas
praemia quae meruit, et quicumque suis sincere praestat honorem,
felicem cursum perferat ad superos.

Mother Earth, indeed to You I pray, settle lightly on these bones, as
he knew that piety is the reward of he who merits it, and whoever
sincerely stands out in performing his own pious duties may be carried
on that happy path to the Gods above.

My sincere condolences goes out to you, mia amica. May your father's
Lares now guide him on his journey.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53356 From: Titus Flavius Aquila Date: 2007-12-09
Subject: AW: [Nova-Roma] a.s. II diem Natalem Christi
T.Flavius Aquila G. Equiti Cato salutem plurimam dicit

Salve Senator Cato,

may I kindly remind you, that as a senator you have to honour the Roman Gods, ideally also in your private domus,
but at least in the public of our res publica !
Your eMail might be seen by practitioner of the Religio Romana as Christian Propaganda or as a missionary try and
they might feel offended.If possible, keep your Christianity in the privacy of your domus.

Vale bene
Titus Flavius Aquila
Scriba Censoris
Tribunus Plebis designatus

----- Ursprüngliche Mail ----
Von: Gaius Equitius Cato <mlcinnyc@...>
An: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Gesendet: Sonntag, den 9. Dezember 2007, 10:21:38 Uhr
Betreff: [Nova-Roma] a.s. II diem Natalem Christi

OSD C. Equitius Cato

Salvete omnes!

Hodie est ante septimanem II diem natalem Christi.

O Radix Jesse, qui stas in signum populorum, super quem continebunt
reges os suum, quem Gentes deprecabuntur: veni ad liberandum nos, jam
noli tardare. (O Root of Jesse, which standest for an ensign of the
people, at Whom the kings shall shut their mouths, Whom the Gentiles
shall seek, come to deliver us, do not tarry.)

"And there shall come forth a rod out of the root of Jesse, and a
flower shall rise up out of his root." - Isaiah 11:1

O Clavis David, et sceptrum domus Israel; qui aperis, et nemo claudit;
claudis, et nemo aperit: veni, et educ vinctum de domo carceris,
sedentem in tenebris, et umbra mortis. (O Key of David, and Sceptre
of the house of Israel, that openeth and no man shutteth, and shutteth
and no man openeth, come to liberate the prisoner from the prison, and
them that sit in darkness, and in the shadow of death.)

"And I will lay the key of the house of David upon his shoulder: and
he shall open, and none shall shut: and he shall shut, and none shall
open." - Isaiah 22:22

In mense autem sexto missus est angelus Gabrihel a Deo in civitatem
Galilaeae cui nomen Nazareth ad virginem desponsatam viro cui nomen
erat Ioseph de domo David et nomen virginis Maria. Et ingressus
angelus ad eam dixit ave gratia plena Dominus tecum benedicta tu in
mulieribus. Quae cum vidisset turbata est in sermone eius et
cogitabat qualis esset ista salutatio. Et ait angelus ei ne timeas
Maria invenisti enim gratiam apud Deum. Ecce concipies in utero et
paries filium et vocabis nomen eius Iesum.

Valete bene in expectio Christi!

Cato





__________________________________ Ihr erstes Fernweh? Wo gibt es den schönsten Strand? www.yahoo.de/clever

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53357 From: GAIVS IVLIANVS Date: 2007-12-09
Subject: Which type of Pileus was worn at Saturnalia?!
Salvete Romani et Omnes! Can anyone tell me for sure
which type or style of Pileus was worn at the
Saturnalia?! Was it the Phrygian type, or the pointed
egg shape style, or were both types worn?! All
accounts I've read state it was colored RED, but when
a slave was freed, the felt Pileus was undyed. Valete!
Gaivs Ivlianvs


____________________________________________________________________________________
Never miss a thing. Make Yahoo your home page.
http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53358 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2007-12-09
Subject: Re: a.s. II diem Natalem Christi
Cato T. Flavio Aquilae sal.

Salve Flavius Aquila.

As a citizen of the Respublica, I have the right to share anything I
want in the Forum. If you see anything in a subject line which does
not interest you, you are certainly free not to open it or read it.

Our Jewish citizens may post on the Festival of Lights which we are
in the midst of now; our Moslem citizens may post their religious
observances, &c. We are an open, free community.

As it is, this is the Second Sunday of Advent. I fully intend to
share this, and the subsequent Sundays in Advent (there are two
more), and indeed the celebration of the Feast of The Nativity
itself, here in the Forum.

Vale,

Cato
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53359 From: Quintus Iulius Probus Date: 2007-12-09
Subject: Oath of the Office
Salvete

I, Radoi Constantin (Quintus Iulius Probus) do hereby solemnly swear to uphold the honor
of Nova Roma, and to act always in the best interests of the people and the Senate of Nova
Roma.
As a magistrate of Nova Roma, I, Quintus Iulius Probus swear to honor the Gods and
Goddesses of Rome in my public dealings, and to pursue the Roman Virtues in my public
and private life.
I, Quintus Iulius Probus swear to uphold and defend the Religio Romana as the State
Religion of Nova Roma and swear never to act in a way that would threaten its status as
the State Religion.
I, Quintus Iulius Probus swear to protect and defend the Constitution of Nova Roma.
I, Quintus Iulius Probus further swear to fulfill the obligations and responsibilities of the
office of tribunus plebis to the best of my abilities.
On my honor as a Citizen of Nova Roma, and in the presence of the Gods and Goddesses
of the Roman people and by their will and favor, do I accept the position of tribunus plebis
and all the rights, privileges, obligations, and responsibilities attendant thereto.

Optime Valete

Q.Ivl.Probvs
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53360 From: marcushoratius Date: 2007-12-09
Subject: Re: a.s. II diem Natalem Christi
M Moravius Piscinus T Flavio Aquilae, Quiritibus SPD:

There is no reason why anyone should take offense at the pietas of
another. We are not here competing against one another. Nova Roma
was founded with expression to remain open to all who share an
interest in seeing the Res Publica restored and its virutes
extolled. That has always included Christians and Jews as well as
cultores Deorum.

I have repeatedly had to remind people that the religio Romana is not
an exclusionary relgious tradition. It is perfectly acceptable for a
person to remain a Christian and still be a gentilis Romanus honoring
our common Maiores. It is perfectly acceptable in the religio Romana
to remain a Christian and also be a cultor Deorum. At least in my
mind it does, and in early Christianity this was the case.

I would pose a thought. We all seek to establish a Pax Deorum for
our Res Publica. We all recognize that besides cultores Deorum ex
patria that our Citizens include those who worship Isis and Serapis,
Mithras, Hellenist deities, the God of Israel, the Christian saints
and Gods, and some also Allah, while we have among also some who
identify themselves as wiccans, worshipping the male and the female
of their Godhead. Likewise, we have Agricola in distant Japan, who,
while offering cultus to our deities of the religio Romana, also
shows respect to the Gods of his host country. The Quirites, our
fellow Citizens, are spread throughout the entire world, dispersed in
diverse cultures, calling upon a multitude of deities in the
traditions of many religions. Is not this also part of our Pax
Deorum? Should we begrudge our Christian Quirites to call upon their
God to look favorably upon our Res Pulica Libera? Does a priestess of
Isis offend our Gods, breaks our Pax Deorum with Them, when she too
asks the blessing of the ancient Gods of Egypt to look favorably on
Nova Roma? How could this ever be? Noster Maiores never behaved in
such a manner as to think that honoring the Gods of foreign lands
should in any way offend their own Gods. Indeed they had just the
opposite view in such matters. When they stood before Olympus they
offered cultus to the Olympians as was appropriate and participated
in the culti Deorum ex patria of Greece. When Scipio's lieutenent
sacked the temples of Croton, the Roman Senate took offense at such
outrage performed against the Gods of that place even though They
were not the Gods of Roma. Even against such a foe as Carthage, the
Romans did not offend their Gods or commit outrage, but instead
invited Tanis to come to Rome where they offered to provide Her with
cultus in a Roman manner.

No, mi amice Tite, I cannot agree with you that any of us cultores
Deorum should take offense here, among our own Quirites, when one of
us honors the Gods, even a Christian God, because that too is part of
our Pax Deorum.

Valete et vadete in pace Deorum.

Io Saturnalia! Io Triumphe! Happy Chanukah. And may my Christian
brothers and sisters enjoy a merry Christmas.

Annum Novum vos faustum felicem.


--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Titus Flavius Aquila
<titus.aquila@...> wrote:
>
> T.Flavius Aquila G. Equiti Cato salutem plurimam dicit
>
> Salve Senator Cato,
>
> may I kindly remind you, that as a senator you have to honour the
Roman Gods, ideally also in your private domus,
> but at least in the public of our res publica !
> Your eMail might be seen by practitioner of the Religio Romana as
Christian Propaganda or as a missionary try and
> they might feel offended.If possible, keep your Christianity in the
privacy of your domus.
>
> Vale bene
> Titus Flavius Aquila
> Scriba Censoris
> Tribunus Plebis designatus
>
> ----- Ursprüngliche Mail ----
> Von: Gaius Equitius Cato <mlcinnyc@...>
> An: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> Gesendet: Sonntag, den 9. Dezember 2007, 10:21:38 Uhr
> Betreff: [Nova-Roma] a.s. II diem Natalem Christi
>
> OSD C. Equitius Cato
>
> Salvete omnes!
>
> Hodie est ante septimanem II diem natalem Christi.
>
> O Radix Jesse, qui stas in signum populorum, super quem continebunt
> reges os suum, quem Gentes deprecabuntur: veni ad liberandum nos,
jam
> noli tardare. (O Root of Jesse, which standest for an ensign of the
> people, at Whom the kings shall shut their mouths, Whom the Gentiles
> shall seek, come to deliver us, do not tarry.)
>
> "And there shall come forth a rod out of the root of Jesse, and a
> flower shall rise up out of his root." - Isaiah 11:1
>
> O Clavis David, et sceptrum domus Israel; qui aperis, et nemo
claudit;
> claudis, et nemo aperit: veni, et educ vinctum de domo carceris,
> sedentem in tenebris, et umbra mortis. (O Key of David, and Sceptre
> of the house of Israel, that openeth and no man shutteth, and
shutteth
> and no man openeth, come to liberate the prisoner from the prison,
and
> them that sit in darkness, and in the shadow of death.)
>
> "And I will lay the key of the house of David upon his shoulder: and
> he shall open, and none shall shut: and he shall shut, and none
shall
> open." - Isaiah 22:22
>
> In mense autem sexto missus est angelus Gabrihel a Deo in civitatem
> Galilaeae cui nomen Nazareth ad virginem desponsatam viro cui nomen
> erat Ioseph de domo David et nomen virginis Maria. Et ingressus
> angelus ad eam dixit ave gratia plena Dominus tecum benedicta tu in
> mulieribus. Quae cum vidisset turbata est in sermone eius et
> cogitabat qualis esset ista salutatio. Et ait angelus ei ne timeas
> Maria invenisti enim gratiam apud Deum. Ecce concipies in utero et
> paries filium et vocabis nomen eius Iesum.
>
> Valete bene in expectio Christi!
>
> Cato
>
>
>
>
>
> __________________________________ Ihr erstes Fernweh? Wo
gibt es den schönsten Strand? www.yahoo.de/clever
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53361 From: Stephen Gallagher Date: 2007-12-09
Subject: FW: [Explorator] explorator 10.33
Tiberius Galerius Paulinus S.P.D.

FYI

Vale



>From: david meadows <rogueclassicist@...>
>================================================================
>explorator 10.33 December 9, 2007
>================================================================
>Editor's note: Most urls should be active for at least eight
>hours from the time of publication.
>
>For your computer's protection, Explorator is sent in plain text
>and NEVER has attachments. Be suspicious of any Explorator which
>arrives otherwise!!!
>================================================================
>================================================================
>Thanks to Arthur Shippee, Dave Sowdon, Dexter Hoyos,
>Diana Wright, Edward Rockstein, Hernan Astudillo, John McMahon,
>John McChesney-Young, Joseph Lauer, Mata Kimasitayo,
>Mike Ruggeri, Richard C. Griffiths, Bob Heuman, Rochelle Altman,
>Ross W. Sargent, Susan Jaslow, Toke Lindegaard Knudsen,
>and W. Richard Frahm, for headses upses this week (as always
>hoping I have left no one out).
>
>Happy Hannukah!
>================================================================
>EARLY HUMANS
>================================================================
>Evidence of tuberculosis in some homo erectus remains:
>
>http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2007-12/uota-mac120407.php
>http://www.physorg.com/news116230398.html
>http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2007/12/071207091852.htm
>http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2007/12/071207-tb-evolution.html
>http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/7130760.stm
>http://www.itwire.com/content/view/15709/1066/
>
>A rerun/analysis of that Neanderthal find from back in
>October:
>
>http://tinyurl.com/2rw7vz (Dispatch)
>
>More coverage of the fungus problem at Lascaux:
>
>http://www.nytimes.com/2007/12/09/world/europe/09cave.html
>================================================================
>AFRICA
>================================================================
>Evidence of Dogon and Bamama sacrifice:
>
>http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2007/12/071203091232.htm
>http://tinyurl.com/34tjyt (New Scientist)
>================================================================
>ANCIENT NEAR EAST AND EGYPT
>================================================================
>Much coverage of the discovery of what is being identified as
>the house of Helene of Adiabene:
>
>http://tinyurl.com/3xjepo (AP)
>http://www.jta.org/cgi-bin/iowa/breaking/105751.html
>http://tinyurl.com/2jh5aw (JPost)
>http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/22114603/
>http://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/124482
>http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20071206/ap_on_sc/israel_queen_s_house
>http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/pages/ShArt.jhtml?itemNo=931674
>http://afp.google.com/article/ALeqM5i7NiFRxGJpEGQj58csK1kblhnTpw
>http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5j5Xmggsj_n39zKXq5FW5iq4e7L0AD8TC6HFG0
>http://tinyurl.com/2qggqv (video)
>
>Overviewish thing on the French excavations at Karnak:
>
>http://www.lemonde.fr/web/article/0,1-0@2-3244,36-985210@51-985333,0.html
>
>An alabaster vase has been returned to Egypt:
>
>http://www.dailystaregypt.com/article.aspx?ArticleID=10689
>
>Somewhat vague coverage of an 18th century B.C./B.C.E. burial
>site (or sites) near Damascus:
>
>http://en.rian.ru/world/20071204/90849186.html
>http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20071204/ap_on_re_mi_ea/syria_archaeology_1
>http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/22097619/
>
>Another mummy is getting the CT scan treatment:
>
>http://www.guardian.co.uk/uklatest/story/0,,-7138535,00.html
>
>Rethinking Byzantine Judaism:
>
>http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/pages/ShArt.jhtml?itemNo=930817
>
>A call for the return of bits of the Aleppo Codex:
>
>http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/930333.html
>
>Interesting radio program on 'Biblical archaeology':
>
>http://www.abc.net.au/rn/religionreport/stories/2007/2109263.htm
>
>More on the Hittites' use of 'germ warfare':
>
>http://tinyurl.com/2n6ohd (Telegraph)
>
>More coverage of the 'baby in a jar' burial from Palmyra:
>
>http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2007/12/071203-AP-syria-antiquities.html
>
>Review of Nina Burleigh, *Mirage: Napoleon�s Scientists and the
>Unveiling of Egypt.*:
>
>http://www.nytimes.com/2007/12/09/books/review/Bouton-t.html
>
>Egyptology News Blog:
>
>http://egyptology.blogspot.com/
>
>Egyptology Blog:
>
>http://www.egyptologyblog.co.uk/
>
>Dr Leen Ritmeyer's Blog:
>
>http://blog.ritmeyer.com/
>
>Paleojudaica:
>
>http://paleojudaica.blogspot.com/
>
>Persepolis Fortification Archives:
>
>http://persepolistablets.blogspot.com/
>
>Archaeologist at Large:
>
>http://spaces.msn.com/members/ArchaeologyinEgypt/
>================================================================
>ANCIENT GREECE AND ROME (AND CLASSICS)
>================================================================
>A major find of bronze tableware (for want of a better word,
>I guess) in London:
>
>http://tinyurl.com/2dh4wh (Daily Mail)
>http://tinyurl.com/39efue (Telegraph)
>http://arts.guardian.co.uk/art/news/story/0,,2223766,00.html
>http://tinyurl.com/2p8oqw (Times)
>http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/22133252/
>http://in.news.yahoo.com/071207/139/6o5x1.html
>
>The English press got hold of the Herculaneum throne story this
>week:
>
>http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?id=rare-ancient-wooden-thron
>http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,315246,00.html
>http://www.presstv.ir/detail.aspx?id=33908§ionid=3510212
>http://africa.reuters.com/odd/news/usnL04138888.html
>http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20071204/sc_nm/italy_throne_dc_1
>http://www.reuters.com/article/scienceNews/idUSL0413888820071204
>http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/europe/article3001613.ece
>http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/in_pictures/7128553.stm
>http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/22104595/
>
>Ancient Roman glue from Germany:
>
>http://in.news.yahoo.com/071208/139/6o7ec.html
>http://tinyurl.com/2joguq
>http://tinyurl.com/3d552p
>http://news.independent.co.uk/europe/article3226417.ece
>
>A Roman town site (Chester Farm) might be put up for sale to
>protect it:
>
>http://tinyurl.com/2rzm5b (ET)
>
>They're going to be raising a Roman barge found at Cologne:
>
>http://www.earthtimes.org/articles/show/155522.html
>
>Nice feature on the House of the Surgeon:
>
>http://tinyurl.com/37cnog (Telegraph)
>http://tinyurl.com/2urrjc (Italian coverage)
>
>Investor's Business Daily has a feature on Schliemann:
>
>http://www.investors.com/editorial/IBDArticles.asp?artsec=21&issue=20071206
>
>In case you missed it, here's Harry Mount's piece on Latin in the
>New York Times:
>
>http://www.nytimes.com/2007/12/03/opinion/03mount.html
>ttp://www.nytimes.com/2007/12/03/opinion/03mount-latin.html
>
>... and some followup letters to the editor:
>
>http://www.nytimes.com/2007/12/05/opinion/l05latin.html
>
>Review of Mary Beard, *The Roman Triumph*:
>
>http://tinyurl.com/3955zd (Times)
>
>Recent reviews from BMCR:
>
>http://ccat.sas.upenn.edu/bmcr/recent.html
>
>Recent reviews from Scholia:
>
>http://www.classics.und.ac.za/reviews/2007.htm
>
>Visit our blog:
>
>http://www.atrium-media.com/rogueclassicism
>
>Blegen Library News:
>
>http://blegen.blogspot.com/
>
>Mediterranean Archaeology:
>
>http://medarch.blogspot.com/
>================================================================
>EUROPE AND THE UK (+ Ireland)
>================================================================
>More evidence that Liverpool was a major Viking settlement:
>
>http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk_news/story/0,,2220798,00.html
>
>As suspected a few weeks ago, the Stonehenge tunnel plan is
>being scrapped:
>
>http://tinyurl.com/3dty25 (Reuters)
>http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/22133602/
>http://news.independent.co.uk/uk/transport/article3231222.ece
>http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/england/wiltshire/7130666.stm
>
>On ancient Irish breweries:
>
>http://www.wired.com/culture/lifestyle/magazine/15-12/ps_ale
>
>A mystery (solved) on Greenland:
>
>http://www.csmonitor.com/2007/1128/p13s01-stgn.html
>
>Searching for a Lascaux-like site in the UK:
>
>http://arts.guardian.co.uk/art/visualart/story/0,,2222879,00.html
>
>More coverage of those horse bones in a Yorkshire kiln:
>
>http://www.horseandhound.co.uk/news/article.php?aid=165448&aff=rss
>
>Review of Kate Colquhoun, *Taste: The Story of Britain Through
>Its Cooking*
>
>http://www.nytimes.com/2007/12/09/books/review/Jack-t.htm
>
>Archaeology in Europe Blog:
>
>http://www.archaeology.eu.com/weblog/index.html
>================================================================
>ASIA AND THE SOUTH PACIFIC
>================================================================
>A 2200 b.p. burial from China's Hubei province:
>
>http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/china/2007-12/07/content_6304093.htm
>http://english.people.com.cn/90001/90782/90874/6316695.html
>
>A shell mound with a burial from Guangxi:
>
>http://www.china.org.cn/english/culture/234465.htm
>
>Excitement about the Liangzhu ruins:
>
>http://english.people.com.cn/90001/90776/6314224.html
>
>Plans are afoot to excavate a horse and chariot in Viet Nam:
>
>http://news.xinhuanet.com/english/2007-12/07/content_7215171.htm
>
>New Zealand Archaeology eNews:
>
>http://www.nzarchaeology.org/netsubnews.htm
>================================================================
>CENTRAL AND SOUTH AMERICA
>================================================================
>Evidence of an ancient Maya marketplace:
>
>http://www.heraldextra.com/content/view/245945/
>http://nn.byu.edu/story.cfm/66605
>http://www.newswise.com/articles/view/535748/?sc=rssn
>http://tinyurl.com/37q2wf
>http://www.sltrib.com/ci_7620583
>
>I don't think we've mentioned this ancient Maya 'death vase'
>find yet:
>
>http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2007/12/071203-maya-vase.html
>
>Possible evidence of pre-European fermentation of alcohol:
>
>http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2007-12/dnl-des120507.php
>http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2007/12/071205140118.htm
>http://www.newswise.com/articles/view/535910/
>================================================================
>OTHER ITEMS OF INTEREST
>================================================================
>Pondering Hannukah:
>
>http://tinyurl.com/2k5grf (JPost)
>
>Claims that Leonardo da Vinci was an Arab, based on his fingerprint
>(hmmmmmmmmmmm):
>
>http://tinyurl.com/2szvqc (Telegraph)
>
>Interesting item on feuding:
>
>http://www.nytimes.com/2007/12/09/weekinreview/09goodnough.html
>
>Strange happenings in Paris' Pantheon:
>
>http://news.independent.co.uk/europe/article3196264.ece
>
>What is possibly Michelangelo's last sketch has been found:
>
>http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/7133116.stm
>http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20071206/ap_on_re_eu/vatican_michelangelo_found
>
>Arguing about the authorship of "Night Before Christmas":
>
>http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/arts/AP-Night-Before-Christmas.html
>
>Feature on the underwater archaeology program at Indiana University:
>
>http://www.idsnews.com/news/story.aspx?id=46646&comview=1
>
>On electronic 'orality':
>
>http://www.nytimes.com/2007/12/02/weekinreview/02wright.html
>
>On absinthe's 'comeback':
>
>http://www.nytimes.com/2007/12/05/dining/05absi.html
>
>Mark Twain's "Is He Dead" isn't that bad, apparently:
>
>http://www.nytimes.com/2007/12/09/theater/09gree.html
>
>Carbs apparently make us human:
>
>http://www.nytimes.com/2007/12/09/magazine/09starch.
>
>More on the map that named America:
>
>http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20071203/us_nm/usa_map_dc
>
>More coverage of that 'Noah's flood' story:
>
>http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/12/02/AR2007120201535.html
>
>Review of Gregory Clark, *A Farewell to Alms*:
>
>http://www.nytimes.com/2007/12/09/books/review/Friedman-t.html
>
>Oxford Dictionary of National Biography Lives of the Week:
>
>http://www.oxforddnb.com/public/lotw/
>
>Arts and Letters Daily:
>
>http://aldaily.com/
>================================================================
>TOURISTY THINGS
>================================================================
>Pompeii:
>
>http://www.timesrecordnews.com/news/2007/dec/03/hot-spot-frozen-time/
>================================================================
>GENERAL MAGAZINES AND JOURNALS
>================================================================
>About.com Archaeology:
>
>http://archaeology.about.com/
>
>Archaeoblog:
>
>http://archaeoblog.blogspot.com/
>
>Archaeology Briefs:
>
>http://archaeologybriefs.blogspot.com/
>================================================================
>CRIME BEAT
>================================================================
>Nice video report on the return of some purloined Sipan pieces
>to Peru:
>
>http://tinyurl.com/3xetat (NG)
>http://www.guardian.co.uk/international/story/0,,2222675,00.html
>
>A Greek barber had quite a few ancient coins of questionable
>provenance:
>
>http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/europe/article2995087.ece
>http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20071203/ap_on_re_eu/greece_ancient_coins_1
>http://www.earthtimes.org/articles/show/152403.html
>http://www.foxnews.com/wires/2007Dec03/0,4670,GreeceAncientCoins,00.html
>
>Brief item on the recovery of some items from Gravina:
>
>http://tinyurl.com/2jklym (Italian)
>================================================================
>NUMISMATICA
>================================================================
>Hobbyblog:
>
>http://hobbyblog.blogspot.com/
>
>Ancient Coin Collecting:
>
>http://ancientcoincollecting.blogspot.com/
>
>Ancient Coins:
>
>http://classicalcoins.blogspot.com/
>================================================================
>EXHIBITIONS, AUCTIONS, AND MUSEUM-RELATED
>================================================================
>Painted With Words:
>
>http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=14987430
>
>Peutinger Map:
>
>http://www.expatica.com/actual/article.asp?subchannel_id=26&story_id=46542
>
>Artisans and Kings:
>
>http://www.csmonitor.com/2007/1127/p18s02-hfks.html
>
>Fordham is opening a museum for Greek, Roman, and Etruscan
>Art:
>
>http://www.nysun.com/article/67604
>
>Fighting over ownership/possession of some Picassos:
>
>http://www.nytimes.com/2007/12/08/arts/design/08muse.html
>
>The Portland Art Museum has acquired a Van Gogh:
>
>http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=16792247
>
>The Met's 19th century galleries have reopened:
>
>http://www.nytimes.com/2007/12/07/arts/design/07euro.html
>
>An amazing price for the Guennol Lionness:
>
>http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/middle_east/7130337.stm
>http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20071206/ap_en_ot/ancient_lion_3
>http://www.news-antique.com/?id=783375&keys=Sotheby-Guennol-Lioness
>http://tinyurl.com/2subzs (AFP via Yahoo)
>
>Big bucks too for a couple of pages of Mozart:
>
>http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/entertainment/7127343.stm
>
>Italy will be helping refurbish the Egyptian Museum in Cairo:
>
>http://www.adnkronos.com/AKI/English/CultureAndMedia/?id=1.0.1644018855
>
>... and restoring some of the Dead Sea Scrolls:
>
>http://tinyurl.com/2vx4gx
>
>There's a new guy in charge of the Vatican museums:
>
>http://www.earthtimes.org/articles/show/152952.html
>
>Latest coverage of the move of items to the new Acropolis Museum:
>
>http://afp.google.com/article/ALeqM5gB-fyRS6c_HoRqeRw7NC4oCIskxA
>================================================================
>PERFORMANCES AND THEATRE-RELATED
>================================================================
>Cymbeline:
>
>http://theater2.nytimes.com/2007/12/03/theater/reviews/03cymb.html
>================================================================
>OBITUARIES
>================================================================
>Richard Leigh (knights templar/freemason/da vinci code):
>
>http://www.nytimes.com/2007/12/01/arts/01leigh.html
>
>John Strugnell:
>
>http://www.nytimes.com/2007/12/09/us/09strugnell.html
>http://tinyurl.com/35g7sq
>http://tinyurl.com/3yguu5
>
>H. Wiley Hitchcock:
>
>http://www.nytimes.com/2007/12/09/nyregion/09hitchcock0.html
>================================================================
>PODCASTS
>================================================================
>
>The Book and the Spade:
>
>http://www.radioscribe.com/bknspade.htm
>
>Stone Pages Archaeology News:
>
>http://news.stonepages.com/
>
>Archaeologica Audio News:
>
>http://www.archaeologychannel.org/AudioNews.asp
>================================================================
>EXPLORATOR is a weekly newsletter representing the fruits of
>the labours of 'media research division' of The Atrium. Various
>on-line news and magazine sources are scoured for news of the
>ancient world (broadly construed: practically anything relating
>to archaeology or history prior to about 1700 or so is fair
>game) and every Sunday they are delivered to your mailbox free of
>charge!
>================================================================
>Useful Addresses
>================================================================
>Past issues of Explorator are available on the web via our
>Yahoo site:
>
>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/Explorator/
>
>To subscribe to Explorator, send a blank email message to:
>
>Explorator-subscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
>To unsubscribe, send a blank email message to:
>
>Explorator-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
>To send a 'heads up' to the editor or contact him for other
>reasons:
>
>rogueclassicist@...
>================================================================
>Explorator is Copyright (c) 2007 David Meadows. Feel free to
>distribute these listings via email to your pals, students,
>teachers, etc., but please include this copyright notice. These
>links are not to be posted to any website by any means (whether
>by direct posting or snagging from a usenet group or some other
>email source) without my express written permission. I think it
>is only right that I be made aware of public fora which are
>making use of content gathered in Explorator. Thanks!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53362 From: Bruno Cantermi Date: 2007-12-09
Subject: Re: a.s. II diem Natalem Christi
Salve et Salvete!

When the Christianism was made the official religion of Roma Antiqua by emperor Theodosius I in 391, the Roman Empire was already weak, I know, but most of its institutions were preserved by the christian culture that followed Roma Antiqua, notably in the law context, especially in the byzantine empire or Eastern Roman Empire, that was the Half of the Empire that survived for 1,000 years until the death of Constantine XI Palealogus in 1453 and the fall of Constantinople to the Ottomans. example of what I'm saying is the Corpus Iuris Civilis created by the Eastern Emperor Flavius Petrus Iustinianus or Justinian I, who reigned from 527 to 565 (a.u.c 1280 to 1318). It was a model for the legislation of several countries up to this day, including Brazil and Portugal.

Vale et Valete!

Lucius Fidelius Lusitanus SPD.

----- Original Message -----
From: marcushoratius
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Sunday, December 09, 2007 2:14 PM
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: a.s. II diem Natalem Christi


M Moravius Piscinus T Flavio Aquilae, Quiritibus SPD:

There is no reason why anyone should take offense at the pietas of
another. We are not here competing against one another. Nova Roma
was founded with expression to remain open to all who share an
interest in seeing the Res Publica restored and its virutes
extolled. That has always included Christians and Jews as well as
cultores Deorum.

I have repeatedly had to remind people that the religio Romana is not
an exclusionary relgious tradition. It is perfectly acceptable for a
person to remain a Christian and still be a gentilis Romanus honoring
our common Maiores. It is perfectly acceptable in the religio Romana
to remain a Christian and also be a cultor Deorum. At least in my
mind it does, and in early Christianity this was the case.

I would pose a thought. We all seek to establish a Pax Deorum for
our Res Publica. We all recognize that besides cultores Deorum ex
patria that our Citizens include those who worship Isis and Serapis,
Mithras, Hellenist deities, the God of Israel, the Christian saints
and Gods, and some also Allah, while we have among also some who
identify themselves as wiccans, worshipping the male and the female
of their Godhead. Likewise, we have Agricola in distant Japan, who,
while offering cultus to our deities of the religio Romana, also
shows respect to the Gods of his host country. The Quirites, our
fellow Citizens, are spread throughout the entire world, dispersed in
diverse cultures, calling upon a multitude of deities in the
traditions of many religions. Is not this also part of our Pax
Deorum? Should we begrudge our Christian Quirites to call upon their
God to look favorably upon our Res Pulica Libera? Does a priestess of
Isis offend our Gods, breaks our Pax Deorum with Them, when she too
asks the blessing of the ancient Gods of Egypt to look favorably on
Nova Roma? How could this ever be? Noster Maiores never behaved in
such a manner as to think that honoring the Gods of foreign lands
should in any way offend their own Gods. Indeed they had just the
opposite view in such matters. When they stood before Olympus they
offered cultus to the Olympians as was appropriate and participated
in the culti Deorum ex patria of Greece. When Scipio's lieutenent
sacked the temples of Croton, the Roman Senate took offense at such
outrage performed against the Gods of that place even though They
were not the Gods of Roma. Even against such a foe as Carthage, the
Romans did not offend their Gods or commit outrage, but instead
invited Tanis to come to Rome where they offered to provide Her with
cultus in a Roman manner.

No, mi amice Tite, I cannot agree with you that any of us cultores
Deorum should take offense here, among our own Quirites, when one of
us honors the Gods, even a Christian God, because that too is part of
our Pax Deorum.

Valete et vadete in pace Deorum.

Io Saturnalia! Io Triumphe! Happy Chanukah. And may my Christian
brothers and sisters enjoy a merry Christmas.

Annum Novum vos faustum felicem.

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Titus Flavius Aquila
<titus.aquila@...> wrote:
>
> T.Flavius Aquila G. Equiti Cato salutem plurimam dicit
>
> Salve Senator Cato,
>
> may I kindly remind you, that as a senator you have to honour the
Roman Gods, ideally also in your private domus,
> but at least in the public of our res publica !
> Your eMail might be seen by practitioner of the Religio Romana as
Christian Propaganda or as a missionary try and
> they might feel offended.If possible, keep your Christianity in the
privacy of your domus.
>
> Vale bene
> Titus Flavius Aquila
> Scriba Censoris
> Tribunus Plebis designatus
>
> ----- Ursprüngliche Mail ----
> Von: Gaius Equitius Cato <mlcinnyc@...>
> An: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> Gesendet: Sonntag, den 9. Dezember 2007, 10:21:38 Uhr
> Betreff: [Nova-Roma] a.s. II diem Natalem Christi
>
> OSD C. Equitius Cato
>
> Salvete omnes!
>
> Hodie est ante septimanem II diem natalem Christi.
>
> O Radix Jesse, qui stas in signum populorum, super quem continebunt
> reges os suum, quem Gentes deprecabuntur: veni ad liberandum nos,
jam
> noli tardare. (O Root of Jesse, which standest for an ensign of the
> people, at Whom the kings shall shut their mouths, Whom the Gentiles
> shall seek, come to deliver us, do not tarry.)
>
> "And there shall come forth a rod out of the root of Jesse, and a
> flower shall rise up out of his root." - Isaiah 11:1
>
> O Clavis David, et sceptrum domus Israel; qui aperis, et nemo
claudit;
> claudis, et nemo aperit: veni, et educ vinctum de domo carceris,
> sedentem in tenebris, et umbra mortis. (O Key of David, and Sceptre
> of the house of Israel, that openeth and no man shutteth, and
shutteth
> and no man openeth, come to liberate the prisoner from the prison,
and
> them that sit in darkness, and in the shadow of death.)
>
> "And I will lay the key of the house of David upon his shoulder: and
> he shall open, and none shall shut: and he shall shut, and none
shall
> open." - Isaiah 22:22
>
> In mense autem sexto missus est angelus Gabrihel a Deo in civitatem
> Galilaeae cui nomen Nazareth ad virginem desponsatam viro cui nomen
> erat Ioseph de domo David et nomen virginis Maria. Et ingressus
> angelus ad eam dixit ave gratia plena Dominus tecum benedicta tu in
> mulieribus. Quae cum vidisset turbata est in sermone eius et
> cogitabat qualis esset ista salutatio. Et ait angelus ei ne timeas
> Maria invenisti enim gratiam apud Deum. Ecce concipies in utero et
> paries filium et vocabis nomen eius Iesum.
>
> Valete bene in expectio Christi!
>
> Cato
>
>
>
>
>
> __________________________________ Ihr erstes Fernweh? Wo
gibt es den schönsten Strand? www.yahoo.de/clever
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>





[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53363 From: Maior Date: 2007-12-09
Subject: Re: a.s. II diem Natalem Christi
Maior Catoni Aquilaequr spd;
hmm, I discussed this with Cordus offlist back in March
and he said to me very sensibly, 'we need more Roman propaganda!'

One of the more fascinating topics is the fantastic influence of the
Zoroastrian religion, the religion of the Parthians.

December 25th, My Zoroastrian friends will be celebrating the birth
of Mithra, he was conceived by the Virgin Goddess Anahita. This
cultus began around 400 B.C.

http://lexicorient.com/e.o/mithra.htm
http://www.vcn.bc.ca/oshihan/IndexEnglish.htm

The lexorient link is by a Norwegian student of Religion, the
Oshihan is by Irani Zoroastrians and expresses their ancient
understanding of their religion.

I daresay, our civis Aulus Sempronius Regulus, who has been to
Armenia a number of times and Nabarz who is Iranian could help us
with this topic.
bene valete in pacem deorum
Marca Hortensia Maior
>
> As a citizen of the Respublica, I have the right to share anything
I
> want in the Forum. If you see anything in a subject line which
does
> not interest you, you are certainly free not to open it or read it.
>
> Our Jewish citizens may post on the Festival of Lights which we
are
> in the midst of now; our Moslem citizens may post their religious
> observances, &c. We are an open, free community.
>
> As it is, this is the Second Sunday of Advent. I fully intend to
> share this, and the subsequent Sundays in Advent (there are two
> more), and indeed the celebration of the Feast of The Nativity
> itself, here in the Forum.
>
> Vale,
>
> Cato
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53364 From: Titus Iulius Sabinus Date: 2007-12-09
Subject: Re: Terra Mater
SALVE!

Please, mi amica, accept my sincere condolences, too. I'm with my
heart near you in these days of mourning.

VALE BENE,
IVL SABINVS

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "marcushoratius" <mhoratius@...>
wrote:
>
> M Moravius Piscinus carissimae amicae salutem plurimam dicit:
>
> Et te, Terra, precor leviter super ossa residas, sentiat ut pietas
> praemia quae meruit, et quicumque suis sincere praestat honorem,
> felicem cursum perferat ad superos.
>
> Mother Earth, indeed to You I pray, settle lightly on these bones,
as
> he knew that piety is the reward of he who merits it, and whoever
> sincerely stands out in performing his own pious duties may be
carried
> on that happy path to the Gods above.
>
> My sincere condolences goes out to you, mia amica. May your
father's
> Lares now guide him on his journey.
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53365 From: Maior Date: 2007-12-09
Subject: Re: Terra Mater
Salvet Pompeia:
please accept all my sympathies. It must be a terribly difficult
time and know that my thoughts and prayers are with you.
Marca Hortensia Maior

> SALVE!
>
> Please, mi amica, accept my sincere condolences, too. I'm with my
> heart near you in these days of mourning.
>
> VALE BENE,
> IVL SABINVS
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "marcushoratius" <mhoratius@>
> wrote:
> >
> > M Moravius Piscinus carissimae amicae salutem plurimam dicit:
> >
> > Et te, Terra, precor leviter super ossa residas, sentiat ut
pietas
> > praemia quae meruit, et quicumque suis sincere praestat honorem,
> > felicem cursum perferat ad superos.
> >
> > Mother Earth, indeed to You I pray, settle lightly on these
bones,
> as
> > he knew that piety is the reward of he who merits it, and
whoever
> > sincerely stands out in performing his own pious duties may be
> carried
> > on that happy path to the Gods above.
> >
> > My sincere condolences goes out to you, mia amica. May your
> father's
> > Lares now guide him on his journey.
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53366 From: Gens Iulia Date: 2007-12-09
Subject: Re: Real temples - Petronius Dexter and Horatius
Salve Marca Hortensia:
I've been following your posts during the past weeks. Thanks a lot for your answer.
I cannot say that our small, private, improvised rituals can be accounted as "practices in Buenos Aires", as I feel we are a minority. So far, I haven't been contacted by any Nova Roma local citizens since we became citizens too. I'm having a bit of problems too navigating the new Wiki website. As an example, while I found easily the "Gens Iulia" list when I applied, now I see there is no page for it at Wiki. Same thing with our Province's citizens' list. So I have no idea how many of us are still active.
Regarding other polytheistic groups here. Most of the local scene is composed by solitary Wicca practitioners, plus a few "High Priestesses" ordained either by Glastonbury Kathy Jones (no comment on that one), or other local Wiccan groups. There is one lady representing the Pagan Federation here, but... well, their more "intuitive", "practical magic" oriented approach doesn't quite match my own more scholarly, reconstructionist oriented view. I know from, sadly, personal experience.
As for YSEE. One of the (few, not to say "only") local people who actually engaged into a more ritual/Deities oriented approach, later on contacted people from YSEE in Greece, by e-mail. So far, it seems she managed to get in touch with one of their members (appointed by one of the group's leaders in Greece) who regularly visits some relatives here (at least once a year), and was able to instruct her and eventually initiate her into their particular rituals and worship. I might eventually contact this young lady, but so far, she is not into organising any sort of local group.
Keep in mind that we live into a highly Catholic country, where even politicians who are not confessed Catholic, cannot take any official position, stated by our Constitution.
Not counting many Fundamentalist Christian groups which are growing exponentially in numbers.
Personally speaking, coming out as a non practicing Christian/Jew/Moslem/Buddhist/Hinduist/Hare Krishna.... (by a somehow decreasing degree of local "credibility", at least from the Hinduist part on) can affect even our own personal lives and professions. Let's say that I dare to make this statements here because this is a non-public website. Otherwise... I'd keep my mouth shut.
So, as you can see, all this chat about Temples and the like, somehow sounds like a fairy tale to me.Or at least, wistful thinking. All our specific, local, provincial problems should be taken into account. If at least ONE country could make Religio Romana an official worship, maybe this specific reference might help other people approach local authorities and see what can be done to get official recognition. That's what happened, as an example, with Mormons here. They only sent a few representatives from the States, then they started gathering new members, but their being an acknowledged religion in their country helped them get official status here. It is not as easy as it sounds on the web.
Vale bene!.
Gaia Iulia Agrippa.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Maior" <rory12001@...>
To: <Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Saturday, December 08, 2007 8:46 PM
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Real temples - Petronius Dexter and Horatius


> Salvete Gaia Iulia et Gai Petroni:
> it's wonderful to hear about practices in Buenos Aires, thank you:) Are there many many groups in Argentina? I agree with you the best way is to start forming a pan-pagan organization, for with numbers you get representation.
>
> In Europe I've watched the Greek Polytheists, YSEE, in Greece work via court rulings, for official recognition.
> http://www.ysee.gr/index-eng.php
>
> There is EU law to help them and it would help the Gallic cultores as well. Dexter, if you want to, join up with the Druids and form a pan-pagan French group and talk with YSEE. On the other hand if you don't have a passion for organizing. Find a less famous Roman temple and have ceremonies there or in a sacred wood if there are any left in Brittany with the Druids.
>
> If they mention Rome in a bad way, tell them we didn't destroy the Druids;-). Hibernia (where I lived) and Alba were Druid strongholds with no Romans & there are none today, sadly.
> bene valete in pacem deorum
> Marca Hortensia Maior
>
> > Here, in Buenos Aires, we have a wonderful Botanical Garden, built during the late 1800's. Many "foreigner" species from Europe were brought, including an oak whic must be at least 100 years old. This old Oak has become our "private" altar, no matter how many strange looks we, my husband and I, might get when pouring ale and bits of grain bread whenever we can.
>
> > So, the main question might be, what can we actually do to be acknowledged as a bona fide religion in each country?. How Nova Roma, as an organization, might eventually help towards this goal?.
> > Valete!!
> > Gaia Iulia Agrippa.
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.16.17/1179 - Release Date: 09/12/07 11:06 a.m.
>
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53367 From: Gens Iulia Date: 2007-12-09
Subject: Re: a.s. II diem Natalem Christi
Salvete!:
Interesting exchange, to say the least. While I do not want over all the "About Christians in Nova Roma" issue again, as it has been discussed ad nauseam, I could say that Titus Flavius Aquila has simply exercised his own right to get on his own "soap box" and express his (rather shared, at least in my household - hubby waving from the side!!) feelings on this issue.
But I believe, if I got Aquila's mail right (after all, English is not my "muttersprache", as Freud stated it), that he is not quite addressing the citizen, but the "SENATOR".
So far, even in the States we all have witnessed a separation between what a citizen might do in his own private life, and what an Official representative might do. During the last decade, while surely many men around the world (let alone the States) cheated on their wives, when a Head of State did it, it caused a huge problem, up to the point that the aforesaid HOS was called by his Parliament to make a public discharge on the subject.
Locally, while gay and lesbians can get a "civil union" (at least in some provinces), when a local Judge was suspicious of visiting a "massage parlour" attended by young men, also there was a public outcry. So while nobody quite objected his sexual choices, as a public servant, the "populus" expected some sort of... moderate behaviour.
So, I ask, why our own representatives shouldn't be asked to
have the same kind of "moderation"? Reading the page of "Frequently asked questions" which I downloaded on 2006,

Do I have to be Pagan to join?
A: Absolutely not! Although most of our Citizens are currently pagans of one ilk or another, and the public "State" religion of Nova Roma is the Religio Romana, we in no shape, matter, or form require Citizens to practice Roman Paganism. The one exception to this is our magistrates; because they are not only civil servants but also have functions within the Religio Romana, we ask that they at least be willing to fulfil those religious functions. We have absolutely no interest in the private religious lives of any of our Citizens. All that's required is a love of all things Roman;

so... can anybody explain this to me?.

Valete!.

Gaia Iulia Agrippa. Decimus Cassius Lupus.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Gaius Equitius Cato" <mlcinnyc@...>
To: <Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Sunday, December 09, 2007 10:10 AM
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: a.s. II diem Natalem Christi


> Cato T. Flavio Aquilae sal.
>
> Salve Flavius Aquila.
>
> As a citizen of the Respublica, I have the right to share anything I
> want in the Forum. If you see anything in a subject line which does
> not interest you, you are certainly free not to open it or read it.
>
> Our Jewish citizens may post on the Festival of Lights which we are
> in the midst of now; our Moslem citizens may post their religious
> observances, &c. We are an open, free community.
>
> As it is, this is the Second Sunday of Advent. I fully intend to
> share this, and the subsequent Sundays in Advent (there are two
> more), and indeed the celebration of the Feast of The Nativity
> itself, here in the Forum.
>
> Vale,
>
> Cato
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.16.17/1179 - Release Date: 09/12/07 11:06 a.m.
>
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53368 From: Maior Date: 2007-12-09
Subject: Re: Real temples - Petronius Dexter and Horatius
Salve Gaia Iulia;
since I work as a scriba for the censor Caeso Fabius Buteo
Modianus, I just checked the database for Argentina, there are 9
other cives. I will ask the censor's permission to send them to you
today.
Also here is the gens Iulia page. Roma Antiqua is distinguised from
Nova Roma by (Nova Roma)
http://www.novaroma.org/nr/Category:Gens_Iulia_%28Nova_Roma%29

Here is the Nova Roma wiki group. Please join!
http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/NRWiki/
Octavius, Agricola, Callidus are very nice & helpful; you will be
able to set up online temples, write articles.

Here is a link to Daily Rituals:
http://www.novaroma.org/nr/Daily_Rituals_%28Nova_Roma%29
and others
http://www.novaroma.org/nr/Category:Religio_Romana_%28Nova_Roma%29
and gods
http://www.novaroma.org/nr/Category:Roman_Gods

I sympathize with your difficulties; different provinces have
different problems. Titus Flavius Aquila and I want to work with the
Italian cultores for just this reason. Official recognition will
help others in all countries.
The city of Rome just financed a solstice celebration for the
Federazaion Pagane, so I don't think this is pie in the sky.
I am here to help you in any way!
bene valete in pacem deorum
Marca Hortensia Maior
> Salve Marca Hortensia:
> I've been following your posts during the past weeks. Thanks a lot
for your answer.
> I cannot say that our small, private, improvised rituals can be
accounted as "practices in Buenos Aires", as I feel we are a
minority. So far, I haven't been contacted by any Nova Roma local
citizens since we became citizens too. I'm having a bit of problems
too navigating the new Wiki website. As an example, while I found
easily the "Gens Iulia" list when I applied, now I see there is no
page for it at Wiki. Same thing with our Province's citizens' list.
So I have no idea how many of us are still active.
> Regarding other polytheistic groups here. Most of the local scene
is composed by solitary Wicca practitioners, plus a few "High
Priestesses" ordained either by Glastonbury Kathy Jones (no comment
on that one), or other local Wiccan groups. There is one lady
representing the Pagan Federation here, but... well, their
more "intuitive", "practical magic" oriented approach doesn't quite
match my own more scholarly, reconstructionist oriented view. I know
from, sadly, personal experience.
> As for YSEE. One of the (few, not to say "only") local people who
actually engaged into a more ritual/Deities oriented approach, later
on contacted people from YSEE in Greece, by e-mail. So far, it seems
she managed to get in touch with one of their members (appointed by
one of the group's leaders in Greece) who regularly visits some
relatives here (at least once a year), and was able to instruct her
and eventually initiate her into their particular rituals and
worship. I might eventually contact this young lady, but so far, she
is not into organising any sort of local group.
> Keep in mind that we live into a highly Catholic country, where
even politicians who are not confessed Catholic, cannot take any
official position, stated by our Constitution.
> Not counting many Fundamentalist Christian groups which are
growing exponentially in numbers.
> Personally speaking, coming out as a non practicing
Christian/Jew/Moslem/Buddhist/Hinduist/Hare Krishna.... (by a
somehow decreasing degree of local "credibility", at least from the
Hinduist part on) can affect even our own personal lives and
professions. Let's say that I dare to make this statements here
because this is a non-public website. Otherwise... I'd keep my mouth
shut.
> So, as you can see, all this chat about Temples and the like,
somehow sounds like a fairy tale to me.Or at least, wistful
thinking. All our specific, local, provincial problems should be
taken into account. If at least ONE country could make Religio
Romana an official worship, maybe this specific reference might help
other people approach local authorities and see what can be done to
get official recognition. That's what happened, as an example, with
Mormons here. They only sent a few representatives from the States,
then they started gathering new members, but their being an
acknowledged religion in their country helped them get official
status here. It is not as easy as it sounds on the web.
> Vale bene!.
> Gaia Iulia Agrippa.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Maior" <rory12001@...>
> To: <Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com>
> Sent: Saturday, December 08, 2007 8:46 PM
> Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Real temples - Petronius Dexter and
Horatius
>
>
> > Salvete Gaia Iulia et Gai Petroni:
> > it's wonderful to hear about practices in Buenos Aires, thank
you:) Are there many many groups in Argentina? I agree with you the
best way is to start forming a pan-pagan organization, for with
numbers you get representation.
> >
> > In Europe I've watched the Greek Polytheists, YSEE, in Greece
work via court rulings, for official recognition.
> > http://www.ysee.gr/index-eng.php
> >
> > There is EU law to help them and it would help the Gallic
cultores as well. Dexter, if you want to, join up with the Druids
and form a pan-pagan French group and talk with YSEE. On the other
hand if you don't have a passion for organizing. Find a less famous
Roman temple and have ceremonies there or in a sacred wood if there
are any left in Brittany with the Druids.
> >
> > If they mention Rome in a bad way, tell them we didn't destroy
the Druids;-). Hibernia (where I lived) and Alba were Druid
strongholds with no Romans & there are none today, sadly.
> > bene valete in pacem deorum
> > Marca Hortensia Maior
> >
> > > Here, in Buenos Aires, we have a wonderful Botanical Garden,
built during the late 1800's. Many "foreigner" species from Europe
were brought, including an oak whic must be at least 100 years old.
This old Oak has become our "private" altar, no matter how many
strange looks we, my husband and I, might get when pouring ale and
bits of grain bread whenever we can.
> >
> > > So, the main question might be, what can we actually do to be
acknowledged as a bona fide religion in each country?. How Nova
Roma, as an organization, might eventually help towards this goal?.
> > > Valete!!
> > > Gaia Iulia Agrippa.
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > No virus found in this incoming message.
> > Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> > Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.16.17/1179 - Release
Date: 09/12/07 11:06 a.m.
> >
> >
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53369 From: Gens Iulia Date: 2007-12-09
Subject: Re: a.s. II diem Natalem Christi - Marca Hortensia
Salve Marca Hortensia!.
You are a real treasure. I mean.. it was almost maddening to lose track of Narbaz. I downloaded his article on Mithras from an University website quite a while ago, only to get a "no URL found" last time I tried to access it. Is he a citizen of Nova Roma?. Is it there any way to get in contact with him?. There are a few details on the aforesaid article which I'd love to discuss, off list of course, with him.
Vale bene!.
Gaia Iulia Agrippa.
PS: my thoughts, exactly, on this issue.
As for the Terra Mater thread, I might have missed the original post. Still, my condolences to Pompeia.


----- Original Message -----
From: "Maior" <rory12001@...>
To: <Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Sunday, December 09, 2007 5:23 PM
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: a.s. II diem Natalem Christi


> Maior Catoni Aquilaequr spd;
> hmm, I discussed this with Cordus offlist back in March
> and he said to me very sensibly, 'we need more Roman propaganda!'
>
> One of the more fascinating topics is the fantastic influence of the
> Zoroastrian religion, the religion of the Parthians.
>
> December 25th, My Zoroastrian friends will be celebrating the birth
> of Mithra, he was conceived by the Virgin Goddess Anahita. This
> cultus began around 400 B.C.
>
> http://lexicorient.com/e.o/mithra.htm
> http://www.vcn.bc.ca/oshihan/IndexEnglish.htm
>
> The lexorient link is by a Norwegian student of Religion, the
> Oshihan is by Irani Zoroastrians and expresses their ancient
> understanding of their religion.
>
> I daresay, our civis Aulus Sempronius Regulus, who has been to
> Armenia a number of times and Nabarz who is Iranian could help us
> with this topic.
> bene valete in pacem deorum
> Marca Hortensia Maior
> >
> > As a citizen of the Respublica, I have the right to share anything
> I
> > want in the Forum. If you see anything in a subject line which
> does
> > not interest you, you are certainly free not to open it or read it.
> >
> > Our Jewish citizens may post on the Festival of Lights which we
> are
> > in the midst of now; our Moslem citizens may post their religious
> > observances, &c. We are an open, free community.
> >
> > As it is, this is the Second Sunday of Advent. I fully intend to
> > share this, and the subsequent Sundays in Advent (there are two
> > more), and indeed the celebration of the Feast of The Nativity
> > itself, here in the Forum.
> >
> > Vale,
> >
> > Cato
> >
>
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.16.17/1179 - Release Date: 09/12/07 11:06 a.m.
>
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53370 From: iulius sabinus Date: 2007-12-09
Subject: Re: a.s. II diem Natalem Christi - Marca Hortensia
SALVE!

You can talk with him here:

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/mithras/

VALE BENE,
IVL SABINVS

Gens Iulia <maite_cat@...> wrote:
Salve Marca Hortensia!.
You are a real treasure. I mean.. it was almost maddening to lose track of Narbaz. I downloaded his article on Mithras from an University website quite a while ago, only to get a "no URL found" last time I tried to access it. Is he a citizen of Nova Roma?. Is it there any way to get in contact with him?. There are a few details on the aforesaid article which I'd love to discuss, off list of course, with him.
Vale bene!.
Gaia Iulia Agrippa.
PS: my thoughts, exactly, on this issue.
As for the Terra Mater thread, I might have missed the original post. Still, my condolences to Pompeia.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Maior" <rory12001@...>
To: <Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Sunday, December 09, 2007 5:23 PM
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: a.s. II diem Natalem Christi

> Maior Catoni Aquilaequr spd;
> hmm, I discussed this with Cordus offlist back in March
> and he said to me very sensibly, 'we need more Roman propaganda!'
>
> One of the more fascinating topics is the fantastic influence of the
> Zoroastrian religion, the religion of the Parthians.
>
> December 25th, My Zoroastrian friends will be celebrating the birth
> of Mithra, he was conceived by the Virgin Goddess Anahita. This
> cultus began around 400 B.C.
>
> http://lexicorient.com/e.o/mithra.htm
> http://www.vcn.bc.ca/oshihan/IndexEnglish.htm
>
> The lexorient link is by a Norwegian student of Religion, the
> Oshihan is by Irani Zoroastrians and expresses their ancient
> understanding of their religion.
>
> I daresay, our civis Aulus Sempronius Regulus, who has been to
> Armenia a number of times and Nabarz who is Iranian could help us
> with this topic.
> bene valete in pacem deorum
> Marca Hortensia Maior
> >
> > As a citizen of the Respublica, I have the right to share anything
> I
> > want in the Forum. If you see anything in a subject line which
> does
> > not interest you, you are certainly free not to open it or read it.
> >
> > Our Jewish citizens may post on the Festival of Lights which we
> are
> > in the midst of now; our Moslem citizens may post their religious
> > observances, &c. We are an open, free community.
> >
> > As it is, this is the Second Sunday of Advent. I fully intend to
> > share this, and the subsequent Sundays in Advent (there are two
> > more), and indeed the celebration of the Feast of The Nativity
> > itself, here in the Forum.
> >
> > Vale,
> >
> > Cato
> >
>
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.16.17/1179 - Release Date: 09/12/07 11:06 a.m.
>
>

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]






"Every individual is the architect of his own fortune" - Appius Claudius





---------------------------------
Looking for last minute shopping deals? Find them fast with Yahoo! Search.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53371 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2007-12-09
Subject: Re: Real temples
>> A. Tullia Scholastica C. Equitio Catoni quiritibus, sociis, peregrinisque
>> bonae voluntatis S.P.D.
>>
>>
>>
>> Cato M. Hortensiae Maiori sal.
>>
>> Salvete.
>>
>> I think the Hudson still teems with wildlife and what might generously
>> be considered "fish" in that they're mostly scaly and probably have
>> several fins...it's the multiple heads that throw people off :-)
>>
>> ATS: And if that doesn¹t do it, maybe the bloody tumors and the eyes
>> where the guts belong might do the trick... ;-)
>>
>>
>>
>> I didn't mean that NYC could not be considered some kind of sacred
>> space, but that there is no evidence - written, physical, or in any
>> local oral tradition - that marks any place on the island as having
>> any kind of historical spiritual importance. There is evidence of
>> habitation and importance as a commercial focal point - primarily for
>> sewant, or wampum - since Paleolithic times, but nothing else.
>>
>> The inhabitants when the Dutch showed up, the Manhattoes Indians, used
>> Inwood Park as a hunting ground, so I guess that might be considered
>> special in some way, but apparently they weren't very good at hunting.
>>
>> ATS: Maybe it wasn¹t the sort of place where the buffalo roamed...or the
>> deer, antelope, rabbits, squirrels...maybe they didn¹t like pigeons,
>> seagulls, or that later import, English sparrows. No glires, either.
>>
>>
>> Vale,
>>
>> Cato
>>
>> Vale, et valete.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> <http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma/message/53319;
>>
>>
>>
>>



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53372 From: liviacases Date: 2007-12-09
Subject: Lucia Livia Plauta - Oath of office
-LATIN VERSION:

Ego, Lucia Livia Plauta (Livia Cases), hac re ipsa decus Novae Romae
me defensuram, et semper pro populo senatuque Novae Romae acturam
esse sollemniter IVRO.

Ego, Lucia Livia Plauta (Livia Cases), officio tribunae plebis Novae
Romae accepto, deos deasque Romae in omnibus meae vitae publicae
temporibus culturum, et virtutes Romanas publica privataque vita me
persecuturam esse IVRO.

Ego, Lucia Livia Plauta (Livia Cases), Religioni Romanae me fauturam
et eam defensuram, et numquam contra eius statum publicum me acturam
esse, ne quid detrimenti capiat IVRO.

Ego, Lucia Livia Plauta (Livia Cases), officiis muneris tribunae
plebis me quam optime functuram esse praeterea IVRO.

Meo civis Novae Romae honore, coram deis deabusque populi Romani, et
voluntate favoreque eorum, ego munus tribunae plebis una cum iuribus,
privilegiis, muneribus et officiis comitantibus ACCIPIO.

-ENGLISH VERSION:

I, Lucia Livia Plauta (Livia Cases), do hereby solemnly swear to
uphold the honor of Nova Roma, and to act always in the best
interests of the people and the Senate of Nova Roma.

As a magistrate of Nova Roma, I, Lucia Livia Plauta (Livia Cases),
swear to honor the Gods and Goddesses of Rome in my public dealings,
and to pursue the Roman Virtues in my public and private life.

I, Lucia Livia Plauta (Livia Cases), swear to uphold and defend the
Religio Romana as the State Religion of Nova Roma and swear never to
act in a way that would threaten its status as the State Religion.

I, Lucia Livia Plauta (Livia Cases), swear to protect and defend the
Constitution of Nova Roma.

I, Lucia Livia Plauta (Livia Cases), further swear to fulfill the
obligations and responsibilities of the office of Tribuna Plebis to
the best of my abilities.

On my honor as a Citizen of Nova Roma, and in the presence of the
Gods and Goddesses of the Roman people and by their will and favor,
do I accept the position of Tribuna Plebis and all the
rights, privileges, obligations, and responsibilities attendant
thereto.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53373 From: Maior Date: 2007-12-09
Subject: Re: a.s. II diem Natalem Christi - Marca Hortensia
Salve Gaia Iulia!.
what kind words:) I love to share all these interesting things.
They fascinate me and now we can discuss them together.

Sabinus is great & gave you the mithras group.

And here is a link describing Nabarz his academics, he's written
some great books & links.
http://www.innertraditions.com/Contributor.jmdx?
action=displayDetail&id=1480

Also you can find someone's email for this group by clicking
on 'advanced search' and under 'author' I just typed 'Nabarz' I
wrote to him inviting him to discuss Mithras here.
optime vale Sabine, Gaia Iulia amici!
Maior


> You are a real treasure. I mean.. it was almost maddening to lose
track of Narbaz. I downloaded his article on Mithras from an
University website quite a while ago, only to get a "no URL found"
last time I tried to access it. Is he a citizen of Nova Roma?. Is it
there any way to get in contact with him?. There are a few details
on the aforesaid article which I'd love to discuss, off list of
course, with him.
> Vale bene!.
> Gaia Iulia Agrippa.
> PS: my thoughts, exactly, on this issue.
> As for the Terra Mater thread, I might have missed the original
post. Still, my condolences to Pompeia.
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Maior" <rory12001@...>
> To: <Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com>
> Sent: Sunday, December 09, 2007 5:23 PM
> Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: a.s. II diem Natalem Christi
>
>
> > Maior Catoni Aquilaequr spd;
> > hmm, I discussed this with Cordus offlist back in
March
> > and he said to me very sensibly, 'we need more Roman
propaganda!'
> >
> > One of the more fascinating topics is the fantastic influence of
the
> > Zoroastrian religion, the religion of the Parthians.
> >
> > December 25th, My Zoroastrian friends will be celebrating the
birth
> > of Mithra, he was conceived by the Virgin Goddess Anahita. This
> > cultus began around 400 B.C.
> >
> > http://lexicorient.com/e.o/mithra.htm
> > http://www.vcn.bc.ca/oshihan/IndexEnglish.htm
> >
> > The lexorient link is by a Norwegian student of Religion, the
> > Oshihan is by Irani Zoroastrians and expresses their ancient
> > understanding of their religion.
> >
> > I daresay, our civis Aulus Sempronius Regulus, who has been to
> > Armenia a number of times and Nabarz who is Iranian could help
us
> > with this topic.
> > bene valete in pacem deorum
> > Marca Hortensia Maior
> > >
> > > As a citizen of the Respublica, I have the right to share
anything
> > I
> > > want in the Forum. If you see anything in a subject line
which
> > does
> > > not interest you, you are certainly free not to open it or
read it.
> > >
> > > Our Jewish citizens may post on the Festival of Lights which
we
> > are
> > > in the midst of now; our Moslem citizens may post their
religious
> > > observances, &c. We are an open, free community.
> > >
> > > As it is, this is the Second Sunday of Advent. I fully intend
to
> > > share this, and the subsequent Sundays in Advent (there are
two
> > > more), and indeed the celebration of the Feast of The Nativity
> > > itself, here in the Forum.
> > >
> > > Vale,
> > >
> > > Cato
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > No virus found in this incoming message.
> > Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> > Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.16.17/1179 - Release
Date: 09/12/07 11:06 a.m.
> >
> >
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53374 From: Stephen Gallagher Date: 2007-12-09
Subject: The Comitia Populi Tributa is called
The Comitia Populi Tributa is called

Ex offico Tiberius Galerius Paulinus

I have asked Censor and Augur Gaius Fabius Buteo Modianus
to take the auspices.

The Comitia Populi Tributa is convened to vote for the few remaining
Tribal magistrates for calendar year 2761 a.u.c and to enact legislation as
listed.

The Contio will begin at 18:00 , Roman time (Central European Time),
on 10 December and will last until 17:59 Roma time, on 16 December .
Voting will then commence at 18:00 (CET) on 16 December and will end
at 17:59 PM (CET) on 21 December 2760.

The presidium (the first tribe to be counted) shall be Tribe X

The candidates up for election are:
QUAESTOR (3 openings)

Cn. Cornelius Lentulus
Has been a citizen since July 24, 2004
http://www.novaroma.org/civitas/album?id=7694

Equestria Iunia Laeca
Has been a citizen since July 6, 2002
http://www.novaroma.org/civitas/album?id=4137

Marca Hortensia Maior
Has been a citizen since May 20, 2003
http://www.novaroma.org/civitas/album?id=5832

*****************************************

CUSTOS (1 openings)

Lucius Aurelius Severus
Has been a citizen since January 30, 2003
http://www.novaroma.org/civitas/album?id=10086

Proposed legislation

*********************************************************************
LEX GALERIA DE CURSU HONORUM

In accordance with Article IV of the Constitution of Nova Roma, this
Lex Galeria de Cursu Honorum is enacted. It repeals but builds on the
Lex Vedia de Cursu Honorum, which serves as the foundations of the
Cursus Honorum within Nova Roma. The Lex Galeria de Cursu Honorum is
intended to bring Nova Roma even closer in line with the ancient Cursus
Honorum.

The Lex Vedia de Cursu Honorum and
The Lex Arminia de cursu honorum are repealed.

I. No individual may assume the office of Censor who has not completed
at least one of the following:

a. a full term as Consul.

b. at least six months as Consul suffectus.

II. No individual may assume the office of Consul who has not completed
at least one of the following:

a. a full term as Praetor.

b. at least six months as Praetor suffectus.

III. No individual may assume the office of Praetor who has not
completed a full term as either Aedilis Curulis , Tribunus Plebis or
Aedilis Plebis.

IV. No individual may assume the office of Aedilis Curulis, Tribunus
Plebis or Aedilis Plebis who has not completed a full term as Quaestor.

V. No individual may assume the office Quaestor who is not at least 21
years of age and been an assiduus (taxpaying) citizen of Nova Roma for
at least one year.

VI. Citizens who resign their positions prior to the normal end of
their term in office may not use that term to satisfy these
requirements, regardless of how much time they spent in office.

VII. Qualified citizens may run for office prior to the completion of
these requirements but must complete them prior to assuming office.

VIII Any magistrate who resigns from office with three months or less left
in their term will loose all century points for that office, an addition
twenty-five
century points and be bared from standing for office for two years.

IX No person currently serving as an elected magistrate
or who has served at least six months and one day as a suffectus shall
present
themselves as a candidate for office until a period of one year has elapsed
between their service.

A sitting Consul, Praetor or any other magistrate may not be
a candidate for office for the year following their term of office.
A one year period out of office must take place between magistrates .

X. This law shall regulate only those individuals who assume any of
the aforementioned offices after 11 December 2760 a.u.c. for Plebian
offices
and 2nd January, 2761 a.u.c. for all other offices. It shall apply
to all candidates and all elections held in 2761 a.u.c. and all
subsequent years.

It shall not effect the term of office of any person holding one
of the aforementioned positions at the time of the passage of this
law or currently running for one of the regulated magistracy.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53375 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2007-12-09
Subject: Re: a.s. II diem Natalem Christi
Cato C. Iuliae Agrippae sal.

Salve Iulia Agrippa.

Interesting point, and I'm happy to answer from my perspective.

First, I am not any kind of "representative" of the Senate or People.
I am an elected Roman magistrate, not a member of anything like the
US Congress. I do not appear before anybody and vote as the "voice"
in the place of any constituency. If a matter comes up for a vote, my
vote is exactly like any other citizen's vote (with some adjustment
due to civil service, class, tribe, century &c.), and I can only
explain to the citizenry of the Respublica why I would urge them to
vote one way or another on that matter. Even my duties as a
magistrate are not performed in a representative way; my imperium and
auctoritas are absolute within the sphere of my magistracy's
competence and are not bound to the wishes of any constituency or
individual, but rather the law of the Respublica. I choose a course
of action based on what I believe is best for the Respublica as a whole.

When I speak as praetor, I will *always* precede my speech by saying
"ex officio Gai Equiti Catoni praetore" and conclude with my full name
and title. Otherwise, I speak simply as a citizen, using none of the
imperium or auctoritas of my office. I do not usually announce my
position(s) and title(s) in public; it is perfectly reasonable to do
so, and many of our magistrates and other officials both saecular and
religious do in a manner quite consistent with - perhaps even
encouraged by - ancient Roman practice. In my own mind, I see it more
important that people judge what I say by its content rather than by
the office(s) I may hold. This is an *entirely personal decision*,
and offers no reflection or makes any judgement whatsoever on what any
other citizen chooses to do.

Second, the Senate itself is not a representative body either. It is
the collective wisdom of the Respublica to some extent, but its
members do not speak for, say, the citizens of Gallia or Dacia or
America Mediatlantica. Citizens of any part of the Respublica may
write to any senator and, individually or collectively, express their
opinions or desires, but senators are in no way bound to consider
those expressions when deliberating or voting on the Senate floor.

Lastly, if you read through the archives, I hope you will find two
things specifically in my writing:

1. that I fully and absolutely support the public practice and
promotion of the State cult; it was a long personal journey to reach
that point, and how I reconcile my private beliefs with those of the
public State cult is a matter between myself and my God and not
subject to any scrutiny, judgement, or comment by anyone other than Him.

2. that I believe freedom of speech within the Respublica to be of
utmost importance to our sense of community and well-being. All
citizens, from a member of the smallest tribe in Ultima Thule to the
princeps senatus himself deserve to speak their mind in the Forum as
they see fit. Magistrates and senators are not marble sculptures, and
cannot pretend to be; we are human, and citizens, and while we may
have a somewhat heightened sense of ego and pomposity, I am more than
willing and able to get into the middle of a rowdy discussion and
speak my mind plainly, without the trappings of office.


I hope this answers your concerns to some degree.

Vale,

Cato
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53376 From: os390account Date: 2007-12-09
Subject: Oath Of Office - Tribunus Plebis
-LATIN VERSION:

Ego, Quintus Valerius Callidus, hac re ipsa decus Novae Romae
me defensuram, et semper pro populo senatuque Novae Romae acturam
esse sollemniter IVRO.

Ego, Quintus Valerius Callidus, officio tribuni plebis Novae
Romae accepto, deos deasque Romae in omnibus meae vitae publicae
temporibus culturum, et virtutes Romanas publica privataque vita me
persecuturam esse IVRO.

Ego, Quintus Valerius Callidus, Religioni Romanae me fauturam
et eam defensuram, et numquam contra eius statum publicum me acturam
esse, ne quid detrimenti capiat IVRO.

Ego, Quintus Valerius Callidus, officiis muneris tribuni
plebis me quam optime functuram esse praeterea IVRO.

Meo civis Novae Romae honore, coram deis deabusque populi Romani, et
voluntate favoreque eorum, ego munus tribuni plebis una cum iuribus,
privilegiis, muneribus et officiis comitantibus ACCIPIO.

-ENGLISH VERSION:

I, Quintus Valerius Callidus, do hereby solemnly swear to
uphold the honor of Nova Roma, and to act always in the best
interests of the people and the Senate of Nova Roma.

As a magistrate of Nova Roma, I, Quintus Valerius Callidus,
swear to honor the Gods and Goddesses of Rome in my public dealings,
and to pursue the Roman Virtues in my public and private life.

I, Quintus Valerius Callidus, swear to uphold and defend the
Religio Romana as the State Religion of Nova Roma and swear never to
act in a way that would threaten its status as the State Religion.

I, Quintus Valerius Callidus, swear to protect and defend the
Constitution of Nova Roma.

I, Quintus Valerius Callidus, further swear to fulfill the
obligations and responsibilities of the office of Tribunus Plebis to
the best of my abilities.

On my honor as a Citizen of Nova Roma, and in the presence of the
Gods and Goddesses of the Roman people and by their will and favor,
do I accept the position of Tribunus Plebis and all the
rights, privileges, obligations, and responsibilities attendant
thereto.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53377 From: M. Lucretius Agricola Date: 2007-12-09
Subject: Re: Real temples - Petronius Dexter and Horatius
--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Gens Iulia" <maite_cat@...> wrote:
>
> Salve Marca Hortensia:
> I've been following your posts during the past weeks. Thanks a lot
for your answer.
> I cannot say that our small, private, improvised rituals can be
accounted as "practices in Buenos Aires", as I feel we are a minority.
So far, I haven't been contacted by any Nova Roma local citizens since
we became citizens too. I'm having a bit of problems too navigating
the new Wiki website. As an example, while I found easily the "Gens
Iulia" list when I applied, now I see there is no page for it at Wiki.


Salve!

Look here: http://www.novaroma.org/nr/Category:Gens_Iulia_%28Nova_Roma%29

We try to be clear about the difference between ancient Roma and Nova
Roma, so we are using the (Nova Roma) ending to mark articles about *us*.

For a list of ALL members of a gens, you will have to go to the Album
Civium. Go to your page and look carefully and you will see a link
that will show you all gens members. We only make biography pages when
people have held office, are priests etc. The Album Civium shows *all*
citizens.

Optime vale!

Agricola
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53378 From: Stephen Gallagher Date: 2007-12-09
Subject: The link to Lucius Aurelius Severus
Tiberius Galerius Paulinus S.P.D.

I included the wrong link from the album civium for Lucius Aurelius Severus

Here is the correct one.

Lucius Aurelius Severus
Has been a citizen since January 30, 2003
http://www.novaroma.org/civitas/album?id=5237

He has my sincere apologies.

Valete

Tiberius Galerius Paulinus
Consul
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53379 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2007-12-09
Subject: Re: Oath of office in Latin (template)
>
> A. Tullia Scholastica M. Hortensiae C. Petronio Dextro quiritibus, sociis,
> peregrinisque bonae voluntatis S.D.
>
>
> --M. Hortensia G. Petronio Dextro spd;
> salue ami, je suis francophone et viens d'Amérique du Nord;
> souvenez-vous qu' anglais appartiens à la branche germanique, française
> -latine..
> Aux meme temps j'habitais a Paris et faisias beaucoup d'études de
> droit (fort ennuyant) mais Paris c'était superbe:) La Gaule c'est
> plein des temples romaines, j'ai grande envie de visiter les sites et
> les gens gauloises, i Galli !
> tiro in latine sum, sed litteras breves tibi scribo. magnam partis
> legere et intellegere possum!
> vale
> Marca Hortensia Maior
> senatrix
> caput scribae CFBM
> producer 'Vos Romana'
>
> Translation:
> Salve my friend, I'm a french speaker and an American, remember that
> English belongs to the germanic branch of languages , french to
> Latin...
> At the same time I lived in Paris, it was wonderful:) Gauls is full
> of Roman temples, ruines and I want to visit these sites and the Gauls.
> In latin I am a beginner, but I am writing a brief letter to you; I
> can read and understand the greater part.
>
> Scholastica;
> if you can write a better letter in French - go ahead! I've posted on
> the Italian and Spanish NRlists and no one ever said a word about a
> few mistakes, just the opposite! I was praised warmly for trying and
> everyone was incredibly friendly. I encourage all cives to try this.
> Your welcome here and on the other lists will be as warm!
> Maior
>
> ATS: As is so often the case, Hortensia, you have missed the point. When
> you translated the French into English, you added a comment about North
> Americans which was not in the original text. Now, when we translate, we have
> to make adjustments to suit the language in question, but adding something
> which is not in the original does not fall into that category. It is also
> wise to go over one¹s work and check it to be sure that spelling,
> accentuation, etc., are correct before putting it before the public, though
> some are indeed welcoming of any attempts at communicating in their language.
> No doubt you are more fluent in French than I am, as you have probably had
> more of it, and more recently, than I. However, I enjoyed reading Albucius¹
> comments in French on the ML, and didn¹t run away when asked to translate the
> Assimil text from French into English, as you did. It would have been a lot
> easier for you, but I stepped up to the plate and did it, as well as saw to it
> that the other disappeared English translators were replaced so that Avitus
> could teach his courses to those who could not read either French or Italian.
> Cantaber apparently did all of the Spanish translations singlehandedly, for
> which he deserves a medal.
>
> I have left the errors above, both French and Latin, untouched, but
> suspect that some of us can find them.
>
>
>> > Yes French is a beautiful daughter language of Latin but, here, like
> in
>> > many Anglo-Saxon associations French language is persona non grata.
> I
>> > wonder why ?
>> >
>> > G. Petronius Dexter
>> >
>
> Valete.
>
>
>
> Messages in this topic
> <http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma/message/53227;



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53380 From: Stephen Gallagher Date: 2007-12-09
Subject: Our profound condolences
Salve Pompeia Minucia Strabo

I would like to extent to you and your family our
sincere, heartfelt, and profound condolences on behalf
of the citizens of Nova Roma. As a person who has been
been where you are now I can only hope that time will
ease the pain and bring you remembrances of times past.

You, your father and your entire family are in our prayers.

Vale

Tiberius Galerius Paulinus

A Father tries to bring out the best in you......
A Father influences u in every walk to life......
A Father is some one, who teaches u to touch the sky.....
A Father inspires to live life in a wonderful way...
A Father is a teacher of every important lessons....
A Father does all to fill ur world with happiness and joy.....
A Father is always there to show his generosity in so many ways......
You can count on ur father for comfort and care....
A Father is a guiding light & makes u shine all through......
A Father helps to turn fondest dreams to reality.....
A Father is always there to help and guide when things go wrong....
A Father remains an important part in all that u do.....
A Father is always by your side with support and love....
A Father spends quality time with u....
A Father is a rich treasure of knowledge and wisdom................


By Susanta Bandha
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53381 From: Titus Arminius Genialis Date: 2007-12-09
Subject: RES: [Nova-Roma] The Comitia Populi Tributa is called
Salvete

Let me have one thing explained... By this law, no one who is elected for an
office will be able to be candidate in the next year, is this right?
I mean, for example, a Quaestor in 2008 won't be able to candidate for
Aedilis on 2009, but only on 2010; then, won't be able to candidate for
Praetor on 2011 but only on 2012; then won't be able to candidate for Consul
on 2013 but only on 2014; finally won't be able to candidate for Censor on
2015 but only on 2016, and ONLY if he/she is elected in all these terms, is
it right?

Valete

TITUS ARMINIUS GENIALIS
Legatus Pro Praetore Provinciae Brasiliae
Interpres Linguae Lusitanicae
Scriba Censoris
Scriba Praetoris
tagenialis@...



> -----Mensagem original-----
> De: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> [mailto:Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com] Em nome de Stephen Gallagher
> Enviada em: domingo, 9 de dezembro de 2007 21:30
> Para: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com; NovaRoma-Announce@yahoogroups.com
> Assunto: [Nova-Roma] The Comitia Populi Tributa is called
>
> The Comitia Populi Tributa is called
>
> Ex offico Tiberius Galerius Paulinus
>
> I have asked Censor and Augur Gaius Fabius Buteo Modianus to
> take the auspices.
>
> The Comitia Populi Tributa is convened to vote for the few
> remaining Tribal magistrates for calendar year 2761 a.u.c and
> to enact legislation as listed.
>
> The Contio will begin at 18:00 , Roman time (Central European
> Time), on 10 December and will last until 17:59 Roma time,
> on 16 December .
> Voting will then commence at 18:00 (CET) on 16 December and
> will end at 17:59 PM (CET) on 21 December 2760.
>
> The presidium (the first tribe to be counted) shall be Tribe X
>
> The candidates up for election are:
> QUAESTOR (3 openings)
>
> Cn. Cornelius Lentulus
> Has been a citizen since July 24, 2004
> http://www.novaroma.org/civitas/album?id=7694
>
> Equestria Iunia Laeca
> Has been a citizen since July 6, 2002
> http://www.novaroma.org/civitas/album?id=4137
>
> Marca Hortensia Maior
> Has been a citizen since May 20, 2003
> http://www.novaroma.org/civitas/album?id=5832
>
> *****************************************
>
> CUSTOS (1 openings)
>
> Lucius Aurelius Severus
> Has been a citizen since January 30, 2003
> http://www.novaroma.org/civitas/album?id=10086
>
> Proposed legislation
>
> *********************************************************************
> LEX GALERIA DE CURSU HONORUM
>
> In accordance with Article IV of the Constitution of Nova
> Roma, this Lex Galeria de Cursu Honorum is enacted. It
> repeals but builds on the Lex Vedia de Cursu Honorum, which
> serves as the foundations of the Cursus Honorum within Nova
> Roma. The Lex Galeria de Cursu Honorum is intended to bring
> Nova Roma even closer in line with the ancient Cursus Honorum.
>
> The Lex Vedia de Cursu Honorum and
> The Lex Arminia de cursu honorum are repealed.
>
> I. No individual may assume the office of Censor who has not
> completed at least one of the following:
>
> a. a full term as Consul.
>
> b. at least six months as Consul suffectus.
>
> II. No individual may assume the office of Consul who has not
> completed at least one of the following:
>
> a. a full term as Praetor.
>
> b. at least six months as Praetor suffectus.
>
> III. No individual may assume the office of Praetor who has
> not completed a full term as either Aedilis Curulis ,
> Tribunus Plebis or Aedilis Plebis.
>
> IV. No individual may assume the office of Aedilis Curulis,
> Tribunus Plebis or Aedilis Plebis who has not completed a
> full term as Quaestor.
>
> V. No individual may assume the office Quaestor who is not at
> least 21 years of age and been an assiduus (taxpaying)
> citizen of Nova Roma for at least one year.
>
> VI. Citizens who resign their positions prior to the normal
> end of their term in office may not use that term to satisfy
> these requirements, regardless of how much time they spent in office.
>
> VII. Qualified citizens may run for office prior to the
> completion of these requirements but must complete them prior
> to assuming office.
>
> VIII Any magistrate who resigns from office with three months
> or less left in their term will loose all century points for
> that office, an addition twenty-five century points and be
> bared from standing for office for two years.
>
> IX No person currently serving as an elected magistrate or
> who has served at least six months and one day as a suffectus
> shall present themselves as a candidate for office until a
> period of one year has elapsed between their service.
>
> A sitting Consul, Praetor or any other magistrate may not be
> a candidate for office for the year following their term of office.
> A one year period out of office must take place between magistrates .
>
> X. This law shall regulate only those individuals who assume
> any of the aforementioned offices after 11 December 2760
> a.u.c. for Plebian offices and 2nd January, 2761 a.u.c.
> for all other offices. It shall apply to all candidates and
> all elections held in 2761 a.u.c. and all subsequent years.
>
> It shall not effect the term of office of any person holding
> one of the aforementioned positions at the time of the
> passage of this law or currently running for one of the
> regulated magistracy.
>
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.16.17/1179 - Release
> Date: 09/12/2007 11:06
>
>

No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.16.17/1179 - Release Date: 09/12/2007
11:06
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53382 From: marcushoratius Date: 2007-12-09
Subject: Re: RES: [Nova-Roma] The Comitia Populi Tributa is called
Salve Tite Armini

That is what the proposed lex says. This is not just a needless lex,
it is a bad lex. It is too rigid in application, not providing the
Quirites thier right to elect whomever they wish, as was the practice
under the Res Publica Libera. It does not take into consideration a
candidate's experience, or performance in office, but solely that
having one office qualifies him or her for the next. A cursus
honorum that did not exist under the Res Publica Libera. Even what
Sulla instituted did not go this far.

And what purpose would it serve us now? I suppose we are holding an
extra election because we were so overburdened with the number of
candidates for our othe magistracies that we had to stagger them
out? Yet the Consul would set extra limitations on candidates, and
even prevent qualified candidates from holding different offices from
year to year, there by making the pool of candidates even smaller
than now when we can't find enough candidates to fill all vacancies
in the first round of elections, and when one one office even had a
contended race.

The Consul's proposal for a lex imposing this ahistorical and just
all around bad idea of a cursus honorum should be rejected by all
concerned Quirites.

Vale optime

M Moravius Piscinus
Consul Designatus
Senator
Flamen Carmentis

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Titus Arminius Genialis"
<tagenialis@...> wrote:
>
> Salvete
>
> Let me have one thing explained... By this law, no one who is
elected for an
> office will be able to be candidate in the next year, is this right?
> I mean, for example, a Quaestor in 2008 won't be able to candidate
for
> Aedilis on 2009, but only on 2010; then, won't be able to candidate
for
> Praetor on 2011 but only on 2012; then won't be able to candidate
for Consul
> on 2013 but only on 2014; finally won't be able to candidate for
Censor on
> 2015 but only on 2016, and ONLY if he/she is elected in all these
terms, is
> it right?
>
> Valete
>
> TITUS ARMINIUS GENIALIS
> Legatus Pro Praetore Provinciae Brasiliae
> Interpres Linguae Lusitanicae
> Scriba Censoris
> Scriba Praetoris
> tagenialis@...
>
>
>
> > -----Mensagem original-----
> > De: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> > [mailto:Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com] Em nome de Stephen Gallagher
> > Enviada em: domingo, 9 de dezembro de 2007 21:30
> > Para: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com; NovaRoma-Announce@yahoogroups.com
> > Assunto: [Nova-Roma] The Comitia Populi Tributa is called
> >
> > The Comitia Populi Tributa is called
> >
> > Ex offico Tiberius Galerius Paulinus
> >
> > I have asked Censor and Augur Gaius Fabius Buteo Modianus to
> > take the auspices.
> >
> > The Comitia Populi Tributa is convened to vote for the few
> > remaining Tribal magistrates for calendar year 2761 a.u.c and
> > to enact legislation as listed.
> >
> > The Contio will begin at 18:00 , Roman time (Central European
> > Time), on 10 December and will last until 17:59 Roma time,
> > on 16 December .
> > Voting will then commence at 18:00 (CET) on 16 December and
> > will end at 17:59 PM (CET) on 21 December 2760.
> >
> > The presidium (the first tribe to be counted) shall be Tribe X
> >
> > The candidates up for election are:
> > QUAESTOR (3 openings)
> >
> > Cn. Cornelius Lentulus
> > Has been a citizen since July 24, 2004
> > http://www.novaroma.org/civitas/album?id=7694
> >
> > Equestria Iunia Laeca
> > Has been a citizen since July 6, 2002
> > http://www.novaroma.org/civitas/album?id=4137
> >
> > Marca Hortensia Maior
> > Has been a citizen since May 20, 2003
> > http://www.novaroma.org/civitas/album?id=5832
> >
> > *****************************************
> >
> > CUSTOS (1 openings)
> >
> > Lucius Aurelius Severus
> > Has been a citizen since January 30, 2003
> > http://www.novaroma.org/civitas/album?id=10086
> >
> > Proposed legislation
> >
> >
*********************************************************************
> > LEX GALERIA DE CURSU HONORUM
> >
> > In accordance with Article IV of the Constitution of Nova
> > Roma, this Lex Galeria de Cursu Honorum is enacted. It
> > repeals but builds on the Lex Vedia de Cursu Honorum, which
> > serves as the foundations of the Cursus Honorum within Nova
> > Roma. The Lex Galeria de Cursu Honorum is intended to bring
> > Nova Roma even closer in line with the ancient Cursus Honorum.
> >
> > The Lex Vedia de Cursu Honorum and
> > The Lex Arminia de cursu honorum are repealed.
> >
> > I. No individual may assume the office of Censor who has not
> > completed at least one of the following:
> >
> > a. a full term as Consul.
> >
> > b. at least six months as Consul suffectus.
> >
> > II. No individual may assume the office of Consul who has not
> > completed at least one of the following:
> >
> > a. a full term as Praetor.
> >
> > b. at least six months as Praetor suffectus.
> >
> > III. No individual may assume the office of Praetor who has
> > not completed a full term as either Aedilis Curulis ,
> > Tribunus Plebis or Aedilis Plebis.
> >
> > IV. No individual may assume the office of Aedilis Curulis,
> > Tribunus Plebis or Aedilis Plebis who has not completed a
> > full term as Quaestor.
> >
> > V. No individual may assume the office Quaestor who is not at
> > least 21 years of age and been an assiduus (taxpaying)
> > citizen of Nova Roma for at least one year.
> >
> > VI. Citizens who resign their positions prior to the normal
> > end of their term in office may not use that term to satisfy
> > these requirements, regardless of how much time they spent in
office.
> >
> > VII. Qualified citizens may run for office prior to the
> > completion of these requirements but must complete them prior
> > to assuming office.
> >
> > VIII Any magistrate who resigns from office with three months
> > or less left in their term will loose all century points for
> > that office, an addition twenty-five century points and be
> > bared from standing for office for two years.
> >
> > IX No person currently serving as an elected magistrate or
> > who has served at least six months and one day as a suffectus
> > shall present themselves as a candidate for office until a
> > period of one year has elapsed between their service.
> >
> > A sitting Consul, Praetor or any other magistrate may not be
> > a candidate for office for the year following their term of
office.
> > A one year period out of office must take place between
magistrates .
> >
> > X. This law shall regulate only those individuals who assume
> > any of the aforementioned offices after 11 December 2760
> > a.u.c. for Plebian offices and 2nd January, 2761 a.u.c.
> > for all other offices. It shall apply to all candidates and
> > all elections held in 2761 a.u.c. and all subsequent years.
> >
> > It shall not effect the term of office of any person holding
> > one of the aforementioned positions at the time of the
> > passage of this law or currently running for one of the
> > regulated magistracy.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > No virus found in this incoming message.
> > Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> > Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.16.17/1179 - Release
> > Date: 09/12/2007 11:06
> >
> >
>
> No virus found in this outgoing message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.16.17/1179 - Release Date:
09/12/2007
> 11:06
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53383 From: Maior Date: 2007-12-09
Subject: Re: RES: [Nova-Roma] The Comitia Populi Tributa is called
Salve Tite Armini;
I chose to follow the mos maiorum of Roma Antiqua by taking
a year off between magistracies. Forcing people by lex is unRoman.
bene vale
Marca Horensia Maior
Senatrix
scriba censoris CFBM
producer 'Vox Romana' podcast
http://www.insulaumbra.com/voxromana/ . The address for RSS
syndication is http://www.insulaumbra.com/voxromana/podcast.xml .



> The Consul's proposal for a lex imposing this ahistorical and just
> all around bad idea of a cursus honorum should be rejected by all
> concerned Quirites.
>
> Vale optime
>
> M Moravius Piscinus
> Consul Designatus
> Senator
> Flamen Carmentis
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53384 From: marcushoratius Date: 2007-12-09
Subject: a. d. IIII Eidus Decembris: Lux Mundi
M. Moravius Piscinus Horatianus Quiritibus et omnibus salutem
plurimam dicit: Di Deaeque vos bene ament.

Hodie est ante diem IIII Eidus Decembris; haec dies comitialis est:
Lux Mundi Libertas; Tribuni plebis magistratum.

Today is the birthday of our Diribitor Designatus Marcus Martianus
Lupus. Felices natalis! Di Deaeque omnes dent tibi quae velis

"Speak no ill words today, good men and women, as we honor our friend
on his birthday. Burn frankincense, burn fragrant herbs from lands at
the very ends of the earth, even those sent from Arabia. His own
Genius comes to receive his honors, a holy wreath to crown his soft
crown of hair. This pure nard distilled for his temples and, sated
on wine and honey cakes, he gives his assent. And to you, Marcus
Lupe, may everything you wish for be granted by the Gods." ~ Tibullus
2.2.1-9

Today is when the Tribuni Plebis traditionally took office. Under
the Empire, from the time of Traianus on, it was the date when the
Senate voted tribuniciae potestates to the emperor. For this reason,
this date is also celebrated as a festival of Libertas as the Lux
Mundi who torch shines forth with justice into all quarters. She
later became a symbol of the French Revolution, and of France
herself, who provided the Statue of Libertas that now stands proudly
in New York harbor. She is yet another reminder of how we in the
United State, in France, and in all the World yet own to our common
Roman heritage.

AUC 296 / 457 BCE: First Election of Ten Tribuni Plebis

"The next consuls were Quintus Minucius and C. Horatius Pulvillus. As
there was peace abroad at the beginning of the year, the domestic
troubles began again; the same tribunes agitating for the same Law.
Matters would have gone further-so inflamed were the passions on both
sides-had not news arrived, as though it had been purposely arranged,
of the loss of the garrison at Corbio in a night attack of the Aequi.
The consuls summoned a meeting of the senate; they were ordered to
form a force of all who could bear arms and march to Algidus. The
contest about the Law was suspended, and a fresh struggle began about
the enlistment. The consular authority was on the point of being
overborne by the interference of the tribunes when a fresh alarm was
created. A Sabine army had descended on the Roman fields for plunder,
and were approaching the City. Thoroughly alarmed, the tribunes
allowed the enrolment to proceed; not, however, without insisting on
an agreement that since they had been foiled for five years and but
slight protection to the plebeians had so far been afforded, there
should henceforth be ten tribunes of the plebs elected. Necessity
extorted this from the senate, with only one condition, that for the
future they should not see the same tribunes in two successive years.
That this agreement might not, like all the others, prove illusory,
when once the war was over, the elections for tribunes were held at
once. The office of tribune had existed for thirty-six years when for
the first time ten were created, two from each class. It was
definitely laid down that this should be the rule in all future
elections." ~ Titus Livius 3.30

Today, from Seneca, On the Shortness of Life 7.4:

"It takes the whole of life to learn how to live, and - what will
perhaps make you wonder more - it takes the whole of life to learn
how to die."
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53385 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2007-12-09
Subject: Re: AW: [Nova-Roma] a.s. II diem Natalem Christi
Salve Tite Flavi,

Titus Flavius Aquila <titus.aquila@...> writes:

> T.Flavius Aquila G. Equiti Cato salutem plurimam dicit
>
> Salve Senator Cato,
>
> may I kindly remind you, that as a senator you have to honour the
> Roman Gods, ideally also in your private domus,
> but at least in the public of our res publica !

What in the world suggests to you that Cato is failing in his
magisterial duties to the Dii Immortales?

> Your eMail might be seen by practitioner of the Religio Romana as
> Christian Propaganda or as a missionary try and
> they might feel offended.If possible, keep your Christianity in the
> privacy of your domus.

I'm troubled, Tribune, to see this statement coming from somebody who
has a Constitutional duty to uphold the laws of Nova Roma. Have you
read our laws? Are you aware of the Lex Salicia Poenalis? Section 19
of that lex quite clearly states:

"Whoever incites in another person hatred, despite or enmity towards a
person or group on the basis of the religious beliefs or practices of
that person or group, or who in any other way infringes the freedom of
another person to hold religious beliefs or to engage in religious
teaching, practice, worship or observance, shall make a DECLARATIO
PVBLICA and may also be moderated as in paragraph XIV.B. above."

Educate yourself tribune. Become acquainted with the laws you have
sworn to enforce. And then shape your own conduct accordingly.

Vale,

CN-EQVIT-MARINVS
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53386 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2007-12-10
Subject: Narbaz
Gens Iulia <maite_cat@...> writes:

> [...] Narbaz. I downloaded his article on Mithras from an
> University website quite a while ago, only to get a "no URL found"
> last time I tried to access it. Is he a citizen of Nova Roma?.

No, he is not.

> Is it there any way to get in contact with him?

You might ask over in the Mithras mailing list:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/mithras


CN-EQVIT-MARINVS
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53387 From: Annia Minucia Marcella Date: 2007-12-10
Subject: Re: a.s. II diem Natalem Christi
Salvete!

I do not care to read about christian holidays, but I see no reason
why this man can't post about them.

Valete,

Annia Minucia Marcella
http://www.myspace.com/novabritannia
http://novabritannia.org/
http://ciarin.com/governor
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53388 From: M.CVRIATIVS COMPLVTENSIS Date: 2007-12-10
Subject: Re: RES: [Nova-Roma] The Comitia Populi Tributa is called
Salvete

the proposed lex about the Cursus Honorum is a bad lex, we probably need
internal rules, but this rigidity will cause that we have not enough
candidates to fill the vacancies.

Valete

MARCVS CVRIATIVS COMPLVTENSIS
SENATOR

PROPRAETOR HISPANIA
SCRIBA CENSORIS KFBM
NOVA ROMA

Ex paucis multa, ex minimis maxima
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53389 From: Kristoffer From Date: 2007-12-10
Subject: Re: The Comitia Populi Tributa is called
Salve, Tiberi Galeri Pauline.

Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> I. No individual may assume the office of Censor who has not completed
> at least one of the following:
>
> a. a full term as Consul.
>
> b. at least six months as Consul suffectus.

Right, this is probably sound. Today, we produce two viable candidates
each year, so if one of those (or from previous years, of course) choose
to stand for Censor, we're home free.

However, historically (unless I am misinformed) Censor was NOT part of
the Cursus Honorum.

> II. No individual may assume the office of Consul who has not completed
> at least one of the following:
>
> a. a full term as Praetor.
>
> b. at least six months as Praetor suffectus.

This has the opposite problem as above - it is historical, but it is
also highly unsound.

Each year we produce two viable candidates, so BOTH must ALWAYS choose
to stand for Consul. Or we're out of options. Rome had a significantly
larger number of Praetors than we do and would not run out of candidates
the way we are likely to.

> III. No individual may assume the office of Praetor who has not
> completed a full term as either Aedilis Curulis , Tribunus Plebis or
> Aedilis Plebis.

This is, much like the proposed paragraph for Censors, probably sound in
that we will produce a sufficient number of candidates, but lacking in
historicity.

Aedile or Tribune was never a part of the Cursus Honorum, most just
served as either as a way to gain the favour of the people.

> IV. No individual may assume the office of Aedilis Curulis, Tribunus
> Plebis or Aedilis Plebis who has not completed a full term as Quaestor.

This is irrational. Nine positions may only be assumed by those who have
held one of eight positions. This would force old office-holders to
assume one of these offices again and again, just to fill up the "blanks".

Also, it's ahistorical, as per above. Aedile or Tribune was never a part
of the Cursus Honorum.

> V. No individual may assume the office Quaestor who is not at least 21
> years of age and been an assiduus (taxpaying) citizen of Nova Roma for
> at least one year.

Kind of ambiguous phrasing. I suggest you change it to "and be an
assiduus (taxpaying) citizen of Nova Roma when announcing candidacy." or
similar. If I join January 2008 and pay my taxes January 2009, since I
was exempt from taxation my first year, I won't be able to run for
Quaestor until December 2010. Which means we'll have a two-year period
(after passing the citizenship test) before getting fresh people as
candidates for office. Candidates we desperately need, as you might have
noticed.

> VI. Citizens who resign their positions prior to the normal end of
> their term in office may not use that term to satisfy these
> requirements, regardless of how much time they spent in office.

Sure.

> VII. Qualified citizens may run for office prior to the completion of
> these requirements but must complete them prior to assuming office.

This only refers to the age and length of taxpaying for the office of
Quaestor, since paragraph IX explicitly bars all "higher" steps. You
might want to rephrase this paragraph to reflect that.

> VIII Any magistrate who resigns from office with three months or less left
> in their term will loose all century points for that office, an addition
> twenty-five
> century points and be bared from standing for office for two years.

So their past service which earned them those points count for nothing?
And what's so special about the last three months of a term?

> IX No person currently serving as an elected magistrate
> or who has served at least six months and one day as a suffectus shall
> present
> themselves as a candidate for office until a period of one year has elapsed
> between their service.
>
> A sitting Consul, Praetor or any other magistrate may not be
> a candidate for office for the year following their term of office.
> A one year period out of office must take place between magistrates .

This was Roman practice, but never Roman law. And it isn't viable for
us, with our limited pool of candidates. May I remind the Consul that he
himself ran for Censor and was elected, in violation of what he seems to
feel right and proper?

> X. This law shall regulate only those individuals who assume any of
> the aforementioned offices after 11 December 2760 a.u.c. for Plebian
> offices
> and 2nd January, 2761 a.u.c. for all other offices. It shall apply
> to all candidates and all elections held in 2761 a.u.c. and all
> subsequent years.
>
> It shall not effect the term of office of any person holding one
> of the aforementioned positions at the time of the passage of this
> law or currently running for one of the regulated magistracy.

The above paragraph seems intended solely to allow yourself to assume
the office of Censor on January 1st, while trying to block legally
elected Plebeian magistrates, or people on holiday, from assuming
office. The sane thing is, of course, to make it valid from next year's
elections.

Vale, Titus Octavius Pius Ahenobarbus.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53390 From: Gaius Petronius Dexter Date: 2007-12-10
Subject: Re: Oath Of Office - Tribunus Plebis
G.Petronius Dexter Q. Valerio Callido SPD.

> Ego, Quintus Valerius Callidus, hac re ipsa decus Novae Romae
> me defensuram, et semper pro populo senatuque Novae Romae acturam
> esse sollemniter IVRO.

I do not want to be troublesome, but if you take an oath you have to
perfectly swear. It is the origin of the word religio "religere" you
must to exactly read, repeat, pronounce, deliver your oath. Only if
you respect this formalism (ritus) Gods ear you and are favourable.

But as you are a man ("Quintus Valerius Callidus" is a male name)you
must say : ...me defensurum... acturum esse.

All your oath, Latin version, is wrong. And perhaps Gods can give you
a fatal tribunice ! In your place I will swear again... for the peace
with the gods.

Sit tecum deum pax !

G.Petronius Dexter.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53391 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2007-12-10
Subject: Re: Oath Of Office - Tribunus Plebis
>
> A. Tullia Scholastica C. Petronio Dextro Q. Valerio Callido quiritibus bonae
> voluntatis S.P.D.
>
>
>
> G.Petronius Dexter Q. Valerio Callido SPD.
>
>> > Ego, Quintus Valerius Callidus, hac re ipsa decus Novae Romae
>> > me defensuram, et semper pro populo senatuque Novae Romae acturam
>> > esse sollemniter IVRO.
>
> I do not want to be troublesome, but if you take an oath you have to
> perfectly swear. It is the origin of the word religio "religere" you
> must to exactly read, repeat, pronounce, deliver your oath. Only if
> you respect this formalism (ritus) Gods ear you and are favourable.
>
> But as you are a man ("Quintus Valerius Callidus" is a male name)you
> must say : ...me defensurum... acturum esse.
>
> ATS: You are correct. Since we retranslated the oath of office with the
> correct future infinitives, there are both male and female versions of the
> text and some of the titles of the offices. Callidus looks male to me, and
> has skipped down to the female version of the oath, so should probably repeat
> the Latin section in the masculine...unless he¹s planning a little change in
> his life.
>
> All your oath, Latin version, is wrong. And perhaps Gods can give you
> a fatal tribunice ! In your place I will swear again... for the peace
> with the gods.
>
> ATS: However, the Latin version is voluntary, whereas the English version
> is mandatory. We do ask that everyone take the oath in Latin as a sign of our
> Romanitas, but it should be taken in gender-appropriate form. Latin grammar
> requires the future infinitive in this construction, and in Latin, future
> active infinitives are masculine, feminine, or neuter in one of their two
> parts (future participle), so there are gender-specific forms of the oath of
> office. Both texts are present...
>
> Sit tecum deum pax !
>
> G.Petronius Dexter.
>
> Vale, et valete.
>
> Messages in this topic
> <http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma/message/53376;



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53392 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2007-12-10
Subject: Re: RES: [Nova-Roma] The Comitia Populi Tributa is called
A. Tullia Scholastica T. Arminio Geniali quiritibus bonae voluntatis S.P.D.

> Salvete
>
> Let me have one thing explained... By this law, no one who is elected for an
> office will be able to be candidate in the next year, is this right?
> I mean, for example, a Quaestor in 2008 won't be able to candidate for
> Aedilis on 2009, but only on 2010; then, won't be able to candidate for
> Praetor on 2011 but only on 2012; then won't be able to candidate for Consul
> on 2013 but only on 2014; finally won't be able to candidate for Censor on
> 2015 but only on 2016, and ONLY if he/she is elected in all these terms, is
> it right?

Yes, this is correct. And there are other restrictions. The idea is
that one should allow oneself to be prosecuted for malfeasance in office,
which can be done only when one is not a magistrate. Magistrates cannot be
prosecuted while in office.

I believe that this is the historically correct form, and young lads
like you have plenty of time to take that year off between magistracies.
One can be elected in one year, and take two years off, too. In any case,
they may have to, for there are age requirements: one may be quaestor at
21, but 25 is required for praetor, and 27 for consul, if I am not mistaken.
In antiquity, the consules had to be 42. Cordus says he will wait until
then...
>
> Valete
>
> TITUS ARMINIUS GENIALIS
> Legatus Pro Praetore Provinciae Brasiliae
> Interpres Linguae Lusitanicae
> Scriba Censoris
> Scriba Praetoris
> tagenialis@...
>
Vale, et valete.
>
>> -----Mensagem original-----
>> De: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
>> [mailto:Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com] Em nome de Stephen Gallagher
>> Enviada em: domingo, 9 de dezembro de 2007 21:30
>> Para: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com; NovaRoma-Announce@yahoogroups.com
>> Assunto: [Nova-Roma] The Comitia Populi Tributa is called
>>
>> The Comitia Populi Tributa is called
>>
>> Ex offico Tiberius Galerius Paulinus
>>
>> I have asked Censor and Augur Gaius Fabius Buteo Modianus to
>> take the auspices.
>>
>> The Comitia Populi Tributa is convened to vote for the few
>> remaining Tribal magistrates for calendar year 2761 a.u.c and
>> to enact legislation as listed.
>>
>> The Contio will begin at 18:00 , Roman time (Central European
>> Time), on 10 December and will last until 17:59 Roma time,
>> on 16 December .
>> Voting will then commence at 18:00 (CET) on 16 December and
>> will end at 17:59 PM (CET) on 21 December 2760.
>>
>> The presidium (the first tribe to be counted) shall be Tribe X
>>
>> The candidates up for election are:
>> QUAESTOR (3 openings)
>>
>> Cn. Cornelius Lentulus
>> Has been a citizen since July 24, 2004
>> http://www.novaroma.org/civitas/album?id=7694
>>
>> Equestria Iunia Laeca
>> Has been a citizen since July 6, 2002
>> http://www.novaroma.org/civitas/album?id=4137
>>
>> Marca Hortensia Maior
>> Has been a citizen since May 20, 2003
>> http://www.novaroma.org/civitas/album?id=5832
>>
>> *****************************************
>>
>> CUSTOS (1 openings)
>>
>> Lucius Aurelius Severus
>> Has been a citizen since January 30, 2003
>> http://www.novaroma.org/civitas/album?id=10086
>>
>> Proposed legislation
>>
>> *********************************************************************
>> LEX GALERIA DE CURSU HONORUM
>>
>> In accordance with Article IV of the Constitution of Nova
>> Roma, this Lex Galeria de Cursu Honorum is enacted. It
>> repeals but builds on the Lex Vedia de Cursu Honorum, which
>> serves as the foundations of the Cursus Honorum within Nova
>> Roma. The Lex Galeria de Cursu Honorum is intended to bring
>> Nova Roma even closer in line with the ancient Cursus Honorum.
>>
>> The Lex Vedia de Cursu Honorum and
>> The Lex Arminia de cursu honorum are repealed.
>>
>> I. No individual may assume the office of Censor who has not
>> completed at least one of the following:
>>
>> a. a full term as Consul.
>>
>> b. at least six months as Consul suffectus.
>>
>> II. No individual may assume the office of Consul who has not
>> completed at least one of the following:
>>
>> a. a full term as Praetor.
>>
>> b. at least six months as Praetor suffectus.
>>
>> III. No individual may assume the office of Praetor who has
>> not completed a full term as either Aedilis Curulis ,
>> Tribunus Plebis or Aedilis Plebis.
>>
>> IV. No individual may assume the office of Aedilis Curulis,
>> Tribunus Plebis or Aedilis Plebis who has not completed a
>> full term as Quaestor.
>>
>> V. No individual may assume the office Quaestor who is not at
>> least 21 years of age and been an assiduus (taxpaying)
>> citizen of Nova Roma for at least one year.
>>
>> VI. Citizens who resign their positions prior to the normal
>> end of their term in office may not use that term to satisfy
>> these requirements, regardless of how much time they spent in office.
>>
>> VII. Qualified citizens may run for office prior to the
>> completion of these requirements but must complete them prior
>> to assuming office.
>>
>> VIII Any magistrate who resigns from office with three months
>> or less left in their term will loose all century points for
>> that office, an addition twenty-five century points and be
>> bared from standing for office for two years.
>>
>> IX No person currently serving as an elected magistrate or
>> who has served at least six months and one day as a suffectus
>> shall present themselves as a candidate for office until a
>> period of one year has elapsed between their service.
>>
>> A sitting Consul, Praetor or any other magistrate may not be
>> a candidate for office for the year following their term of office.
>> A one year period out of office must take place between magistrates .
>>
>> X. This law shall regulate only those individuals who assume
>> any of the aforementioned offices after 11 December 2760
>> a.u.c. for Plebian offices and 2nd January, 2761 a.u.c.
>> for all other offices. It shall apply to all candidates and
>> all elections held in 2761 a.u.c. and all subsequent years.
>>
>> It shall not effect the term of office of any person holding
>> one of the aforementioned positions at the time of the
>> passage of this law or currently running for one of the
>> regulated magistracy.
>>
>>
>>
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53393 From: titus.aquila Date: 2007-12-10
Subject: Re: a.s. II diem Natalem Christi
T.Flavius Aquila Cn. Equiti Marino salutem plurimam dicit

Salve Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Senator,

thank you for addressing this issue, which provides me with the
chance for clarification. My statement was done as an worried Nova
Roma citizen,not as a Tribunus Plebis. I will take over my duties as
Tribunis Plebis as of today and I know my duties and rights very
well.

Vale optime
Titus Flavius Aquila



--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Gnaeus Equitius Marinus
<gawne@...> wrote:
>
> Salve Tite Flavi,
>
> Titus Flavius Aquila <titus.aquila@...> writes:
>
> > T.Flavius Aquila G. Equiti Cato salutem plurimam dicit
> >
> > Salve Senator Cato,
> >
> > may I kindly remind you, that as a senator you have to honour
the
> > Roman Gods, ideally also in your private domus,
> > but at least in the public of our res publica !
>
> What in the world suggests to you that Cato is failing in his
> magisterial duties to the Dii Immortales?
>
> > Your eMail might be seen by practitioner of the Religio Romana
as
> > Christian Propaganda or as a missionary try and
> > they might feel offended.If possible, keep your Christianity in
the
> > privacy of your domus.
>
> I'm troubled, Tribune, to see this statement coming from somebody
who
> has a Constitutional duty to uphold the laws of Nova Roma. Have
you
> read our laws? Are you aware of the Lex Salicia Poenalis?
Section 19
> of that lex quite clearly states:
>
> "Whoever incites in another person hatred, despite or enmity
towards a
> person or group on the basis of the religious beliefs or practices
of
> that person or group, or who in any other way infringes the
freedom of
> another person to hold religious beliefs or to engage in
religious
> teaching, practice, worship or observance, shall make a
DECLARATIO
> PVBLICA and may also be moderated as in paragraph XIV.B. above."
>
> Educate yourself tribune. Become acquainted with the laws you
have
> sworn to enforce. And then shape your own conduct accordingly.
>
> Vale,
>
> CN-EQVIT-MARINVS
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53394 From: Stephen Gallagher Date: 2007-12-10
Subject: Taking suggestions and making the lex better.
Salve Titus Octavius Pius Ahenobarbus

I will take your last point first

�The above paragraph seems intended solely to allow yourself to assume
the office of Censor on January 1st, while trying to block legally
elected Plebeian magistrates, or people on holiday, from assuming
office. The sane thing is, of course, to make it valid from next year's
elections.�

Your right! I made a mistake and thought that this covered the
Tribunes and the Aedilis Plebis but only the Tribunes take
Office on the 10th of December

It should read

X. This law shall regulate only those individuals who assume any of
the aforementioned offices after the elections of 2760 a.u.c.
It shall apply to all candidates and all elections held in 2761 a.u.c.
and all subsequent years.

It shall not effect the term of office of any person holding one
of the aforementioned positions at the time of the passage of this
law or currently running for one of the regulated magistracy.

I will have this fixed along with your other suggestion that it should read

"and be an assiduus (taxpaying) citizen of Nova Roma
when announcing their candidacy."

My proposal for the Cursus Honorum is as historical as anything we have seen
introduced
n Nova Roma. Is it that we only want to adopt from the Romans that which is
convenient? In ancient Rome you had to thirty to serve as Quaestor,
thirty-seven to serve as Tribune or Aedile, 40 for Praetor and 42 or 43 to
serve as Consul. In Nova Roma
we have already had people serve in the Senate who were to young to serve as
Tribune, Praetor or Consul. Our age requirement are considerably more
generous
than our forbears allowed.

From the Nova Roman Wiki

�Cursus honorum is the Latin term for the standard political career. A
cursus is literally a race, or a race-track; honores are 'honours' or
'offices'. Political offices were traditionally held in a certain order.
This system developed over the first centuries of the republic and was for a
long time purely customary,

though it was gradually codified in law.

�The original cursus contained only four offices: quaestor, praetor, consul,
and censor. They were almost always held in that order, and by the middle
republic it was rare for any stage to be omitted.�

�These continued to be the only offices which were part of the technical
cursus, but it also became common for other offices to be held in addition:
aedilis plebis, aedilis curulis, and tribunus plebis. A Roman would usually
hold at least one of these offices, usually after being quaestor and before
being praetor, but sometimes before being quaestor.�

�One might also include the lowest elected offices such as the
vigintisexviri as part of the cursus in its broad sense.�

"It was usual to leave at least a year between one office and the next."

and that is written in our own Wiki.

According to by Scullard one had to be twenty-eight to be Quaestor and TWO
years had to elapse between one office and the next.

As to not having enough people eligible it is simply not true.

Seven citizen in Nova Roma have already served as Praetor, incluing yourself
Titus Octavius Pius Ahenobarbus, and have not yet stood for
Consul. While some are more active than others it does show that we have
a ready reserve of former Praetors that can serve as Consul if their
interests
and that of the Republic coincide. The others are

Gaius Flavius Diocletianus
Marcus Arminius Maior
Marcus Iulius Perusianus
Gaius Equitius Cato
Aula Tullia Scholastica
Marcus Antonius Gryllus Graecus

Seventy citizens have served as Quaestor with twenty-five to thirty
available to
serve in higher office. Some will be serving this coming year but the
others are still
available for future service if this proposal passes. Plus we add eight
each year.

There are at least fifteen citizens who have already served as Tribunes
making them
eligible right now for higher office under this proposed Lex. That doesn�t
count
the Tribunes from this year who could stand in future years. We also have
six or seven
Curule Aediles and nearly ten or so Plebeian Aediles who could offer
themselves as candidates as well. While your point about the Aedile or
Tribune never being a part of the Cursus Honorum is valid the Romans had
other requirement that we do not and can not have, like ten years of
military service. It seems like an even trade

We have nine former Consuls who have not as yet served as censor. Each one
could be elected in turn as Censor and we could fill the post for almost the
next decade. Almost a full decade without even counting the two former
Consuls that will be following behind them each and every year.

You ask about section eight

�VIII Any magistrate who resigns from office with three months or less left
in their term will loose all century points for that office, an addition
twenty-five century points and be bared from standing for office for two
years.

�So their past service which earned them those points count for nothing?
And what's so special about the last three months of a term?�

During our first elections , this year, a member of the elections team
resigned from office
putting even more work on those that remained. It is not right to quit that
short
of the end of your term and even worse for an election official to do so.

I have shown we have a large reservoir of talented citizens who have served
before and who can serve again and in a way that is more Roman than how we
do it now.

I ask passage of this lex.


Vale

Tiberius Galerius Paulinus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53395 From: Gaius Aemilius Crassus Date: 2007-12-10
Subject: Re: De dictatoribus senatusque consultis ultimis
C. Aemilius A. Apollinio omnibusque SPD,

You wrote:
�I would hope that any Roman, surveying the broad sweep of Roman republican history, would come quickly to the conclusion that the dictatura is a far more benign and time-honoured institution than the senatus consultum ultimum.�

Totally agree that the dictatura is far more time-honoured institution then the senatus consultum ultimum.

You wrote:
�The dictator was the solution to both these problems because he was simply and straightforwardly what both those cases demand: two consules combined in one person. He had, in most important respects, no more and no less power than that.�

Well I would say they, the dictators, were a little more then the two consuls combined in one person. Since their actions weren�t subject to tribune intercession, they couldn�t be brought to trial for their actions while dictators and had power of life or death over citizens even inside of Roma.

Di te incolumem custodiant.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
C. AEMILIVS CRASSVS
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


____________________________________________________________________________________
Never miss a thing. Make Yahoo your home page.
http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53396 From: os390account Date: 2007-12-10
Subject: Re: Oath Of Office - Tribunus Plebis
Q. Valerius Callidus G. Petronio Dextro S.P.D.

Salve!

> G.Petronius Dexter Q. Valerio Callido SPD.
>
> > Ego, Quintus Valerius Callidus, hac re ipsa decus Novae Romae
> > me defensuram, et semper pro populo senatuque Novae Romae acturam
> > esse sollemniter IVRO.
>
> I do not want to be troublesome, but if you take an oath you have to
> perfectly swear. It is the origin of the word religio "religere" you
> must to exactly read, repeat, pronounce, deliver your oath. Only if
> you respect this formalism (ritus) Gods ear you and are favourable.
>
> But as you are a man ("Quintus Valerius Callidus" is a male name)you
> must say : ...me defensurum... acturum esse.

Mea culpa. I thought I had changed all the gender-specific portions
from the template correctly. I had it right the first time I posted,
but was then told it was too early to post it. This time I used
Livia's page, since it included the English portion, and after
thinking it over, I thought it to be rude not to have the English
portion, but I appear to have missed one spot in verifying that my
Latin was "perfect" in gender, case, and number.

Perhaps we might have to institute a minimum competency test in Latin,
to ensure that all magistrates avoid offending the gods. A new Lex,
perhaps, requiring all to pass this to run, or maintain, office?

> All your oath, Latin version, is wrong. And perhaps Gods can give
you a fatal tribunice ! In your place I will swear again... for the
peace with the gods.

Fatal? This bodes ominously unfortunate. Thank you for acting as
intercessor, but I will also make an offering, and if met unfavorably,
I might have to resign. After all, anything that might turn out as
fatal, as a result of actions taken as a member of Nova Roma, should
be avoided at all costs.

> Sit tecum deum pax !

Multas gratias tibi ago valeque,
Q. Valerius Callidus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53397 From: Gaius Aemilius Crassus Date: 2007-12-10
Subject: De lege Galeria de curso honorum.
C. Aemilius Crassus Consuli Ti. Galerio Paulino omnibusque SPD,

I agree that there was a Cursus Honorum in Roma Antiqua, but this cursus were more due to the custom than from leges. I confess that I was somewhat shocked in last elections, the first ones for me, when I saw that almost no one were respecting the ancient cursus honorum, either by jumping steps on the cursus or by running for a new office while occupying one. I’m not counting the persons that this year candidate for an office lower then the ones they were in, since I count these actions as the willing to fill positions to which there weren’t enough candidates.

I’m convinced that following the ancient cursus honorum and to leave at least one year between offices is the best thing for our Res Publica. But I’m also convinced that this should be attained by the individual actions of the citizens and reproach from the voters, by not voting on the candidates who are outside the custom without a very good reason, and from the higher ranking citizens, by not supporting those candidates. Much like the position defended by A. Apollonius Cordus some weeks ago.

What I don’t think it will be the best to the Res Publica is a set of very restrictive rules imposed by law that will lead to the need of new laws every time an exception would be needed. I doubt very much that this lex will be benefit to the Res Publica even when we have grown enough to fill the 193 centuries, the Senate with 300 Senators and have every year a surplus of candidates for every office, much more now that we can’t even fill all magistracies with only one election.

For that reason I will vote against the proposed lex.

Di te incolumem custodiant.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
C. AEMILIVS CRASSVS
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


____________________________________________________________________________________
Be a better friend, newshound, and
know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now. http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53398 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2007-12-10
Subject: NO on Lex Galeria de Cursu Honorum
Salvete Quirites,

It seems incredible that this proposed lex was just defeated in
November's election and here it's been placed before the Comitia
again. I'm asking you to again vote against it. Nova Roma has
existing laws, the Lex Vedia de Cursu Honorum and the the Lex Arminia
de Cursu Honorum, which quite adequately establish limits on who may
and may not run for office. Those leges are realistic limits
recognizing the size and capabilities of our community. They serve us
well and do not need to be repealed. Moreover, we most certainly do
not need a lex which will result in empty offices every year, as this
one surely will.

Please vote to defeat this proposed lex.

Valete,

CN-EQVIT-MARINVS
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53399 From: David Kling (Modianus) Date: 2007-12-10
Subject: Re: NO on Lex Galeria de Cursu Honorum
Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus S.P.D.

I very much agree with Marinus in recommending to vote against this
proposed Lex. Its not a good law, and as others have said it is a bad
law.

Valete:

Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus

On Dec 10, 2007 10:59 AM, Gnaeus Equitius Marinus <gawne@...> wrote:
>
> Salvete Quirites,
>
> It seems incredible that this proposed lex was just defeated in
> November's election and here it's been placed before the Comitia
> again. I'm asking you to again vote against it. Nova Roma has
> existing laws, the Lex Vedia de Cursu Honorum and the the Lex Arminia
> de Cursu Honorum, which quite adequately establish limits on who may
> and may not run for office. Those leges are realistic limits
> recognizing the size and capabilities of our community. They serve us
> well and do not need to be repealed. Moreover, we most certainly do
> not need a lex which will result in empty offices every year, as this
> one surely will.
>
> Please vote to defeat this proposed lex.
>
> Valete,
>
> CN-EQVIT-MARINVS
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53400 From: Stephen Gallagher Date: 2007-12-10
Subject: Re: YES on Lex Galeria de Cursu Honorum
Salve Gnaeus Equitius Marinus

Please get your facts straight.

I first Introduced this during the second go round after
I had to nullify the first ballot because of technical problems.

I was asked to keep as close to the original ballot as I could
so new candidates were not added and I removed this lex.
This lex was not on the ballot and therefore could not have
been defeated.

Please review my post on how many citizens we already have who
served in different magistracy. These citizens are available to run for
these
offices. Saying we will not have enough people is not accurate.

We have at least seven people who could stand for Consul,
nine that could stand for Censor and dozens more who could
stand for the other offices

The sky is not falling.

Please vote for this Lex.

Vale

Tiberius Galerius Paulinus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53401 From: bill segura Date: 2007-12-10
Subject: Re: Vesta statue
I will pass this information along to my wife
Thank you

Maxima Valeria Messallina <violetphearsen@...> wrote:
Salve,

Equitius Marinus is very correct. Everything I have read about the worship of Vesta by the Romans substantiates that Vesta was never represented by a statue, although it was said that Augustus kept a statue of her in his own private residence. The Vestals taught that Vesta was present in her sacred flame in the hearth in the Temple of Vesta and that she alone of all the Gods and Goddesses could not be represented in cold marble or any other material. I am not saying you can not have a statue of her. I just want to allay any fears of lighting a fire without possessing a statue of Vesta, for She is present in the flame. May I suggest that you light the fire in her honor and ask her to protect your fire. I think you will find She is quite amenable.

Vale bene in pace Deorum,

Maxima Valeria Messallina
Sacerdos Vestalis

"Nihil apud Romanos Templo Vestae sanctius habetur."
"Among the Romans nothing is held more holy than the Temple of Vesta."





Gnaeus Equitius Marinus wrote:
bill segura writes:

> T A Germanicus
> A bit off topic, I recently moved. During my move I broke my
> statue of Vesta. I have not been able to find a suitable
> replacement. Can anyone tell me where I can find one? Does anyone
> know the origin of the donkey that is associated with her?
> My wife will not let me light a fire in the fireplace without her.

For Vesta with Pales the donkey, see
http://www.sacredsource.com/prodinfo.asp?number=VSP

For some other representations of Vesta, check out
http://www.goddessgift.net/page27.html

It's worth noting that the Romans in antiquity never represented Vesta
anthromorphically. She was always represented by the sacred flame in
her temple.

Vale,

CN-EQVIT-MARINVS





---------------------------------
Looking for last minute shopping deals? Find them fast with Yahoo! Search.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]




Yahoo! Groups Links






---------------------------------
Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53402 From: David Kling (Modianus) Date: 2007-12-10
Subject: Re: YES on Lex Galeria de Cursu Honorum
Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus Tiberio Galerio Paulino salutem dicit

"The sky is not falling."

But it probably would be if you are allowed to create horrible
legislation much longer! This lex is a miserable example of
legislation and I hope the citizens destroy it in Comitia.

Vale:

Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus

On Dec 10, 2007 12:51 PM, Stephen Gallagher <spqr753@...> wrote:
>
> Salve Gnaeus Equitius Marinus
>
> Please get your facts straight.
>
> I first Introduced this during the second go round after
> I had to nullify the first ballot because of technical problems.
>
> I was asked to keep as close to the original ballot as I could
> so new candidates were not added and I removed this lex.
> This lex was not on the ballot and therefore could not have
> been defeated.
>
> Please review my post on how many citizens we already have who
> served in different magistracy. These citizens are available to run for
> these
> offices. Saying we will not have enough people is not accurate.
>
> We have at least seven people who could stand for Consul,
> nine that could stand for Censor and dozens more who could
> stand for the other offices
>
> The sky is not falling.
>
> Please vote for this Lex.
>
> Vale
>
> Tiberius Galerius Paulinus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53403 From: Gens Iulia Date: 2007-12-10
Subject: Re: a.s. II diem Natalem Christi - G Equitius Cato
Salve Gaius Equitius Cato:
I've read your mail carefully, several times, mind you, just to be sure I got everything right.
I understand your point to exercise your free speech, and how your public office and citizen status, as long as your post states which position you are taking, are separate issues. For what I've read, same thing applied to Aquila...
As I have expressed last week, I'm all for free speech, having been somehow a victim of the opposite. But then... let's take another, more neutral (I hope!, at least for non Brits) example, considering (I think) that both of us are currently living on the same side of the Atlantic. If you were a Tory and started making praises to "the Iron lady"s 1980's economic politics, I could, as a hypothetical old guard labourite, tell you to stop talking rot, and we could have a lively discussion.
Conversely, just going through past threads, I think most of us know by now which subjects might make other people tick. Still, fortunately, we have a personal choice to either express our minds (and eventually risk a confrontation) or let the subject go.
As you well expressed it, how any of us conciliates our spiritual beliefs with other areas in our lives, is up to us and our God/s. This was never the point.
Still, I find that statement at the FAQ section a bit misleading, mainly for those who chose Nova Roma not only for cultural reasons, but for spiritual reasons as well. As you can see, it is not a personal issue, but rather an observation based on what I read, and what I see. Maybe that specific section should be re-written.
Vale bene.
Gaia Iulia Agrippa.



----- Original Message -----
From: "Gaius Equitius Cato" <mlcinnyc@...>
To: <Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Sunday, December 09, 2007 8:35 PM
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: a.s. II diem Natalem Christi


> Cato C. Iuliae Agrippae sal.
>
> Salve Iulia Agrippa.
>
> Interesting point, and I'm happy to answer from my perspective.
>
> First, I am not any kind of "representative" of the Senate or People.
> I am an elected Roman magistrate, not a member of anything like the US Congress. I do not appear before anybody and vote as the "voice" in the place of any constituency. If a matter comes up for a vote, my vote is exactly like any other citizen's vote (with some adjustment due to civil service, class, tribe, century &c.), and I can only explain to the citizenry of the Respublica why I would urge them to vote one way or another on that matter. Even my duties as a magistrate are not performed in a representative way; my imperium and auctoritas are absolute within the sphere of my magistracy's competence and are not bound to the wishes of any constituency or individual, but rather the law of the Respublica. I choose a course of action based on what I believe is best for the Respublica as a whole.>
> When I speak as praetor, I will *always* precede my speech by saying "ex officio Gai Equiti Catoni praetore" and conclude with my full name and title. Otherwise, I speak simply as a citizen, using none of the imperium or auctoritas of my office. I do not usually announce my position(s) and title(s) in public; it is perfectly reasonable to do so, and many of our magistrates and other officials both saecular and religious do in a manner quite consistent with - perhaps even encouraged by - ancient Roman practice. In my own mind, I see it more important that people judge what I say by its content rather than by the office(s) I may hold. This is an *entirely personal decision*, and offers no reflection or makes any judgement whatsoever on what any other citizen chooses to do.
> Second, the Senate itself is not a representative body either. It is the collective wisdom of the Respublica to some extent, but its
> members do not speak for, say, the citizens of Gallia or Dacia or America Mediatlantica. Citizens of any part of the Respublica may write to any senator and, individually or collectively, express their opinions or desires, but senators are in no way bound to consider those expressions when deliberating or voting on the Senate floor.
>
> Lastly, if you read through the archives, I hope you will find two things specifically in my writing:
>
> 1. that I fully and absolutely support the public practice and promotion of the State cult; it was a long personal journey to reach
> that point, and how I reconcile my private beliefs with those of the public State cult is a matter between myself and my God and not subject to any scrutiny, judgement, or comment by anyone other than Him.
> 2. that I believe freedom of speech within the Respublica to be of utmost importance to our sense of community and well-being. All citizens, from a member of the smallest tribe in Ultima Thule to the princeps senatus himself deserve to speak their mind in the Forum as they see fit. Magistrates and senators are not marble sculptures, and cannot pretend to be; we are human, and citizens, and while we may have a somewhat heightened sense of ego and pomposity, I am more than willing and able to get into the middle of a rowdy discussion and speak my mind plainly, without the trappings of office.
>
>
> I hope this answers your concerns to some degree.
>
> Vale,
>
> Cato
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.16.17/1179 - Release Date: 09/12/07 11:06 a.m.
>
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53405 From: Sextus Lucilius Tutor Date: 2007-12-10
Subject: Galleries
Salvete omnes

Galleries now contain more than 1,200 images of ancient Greek and
Roman art .

http://www.theoi.com/Galleries.html

Valete
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53406 From: M•IVL•SEVERVS Date: 2007-12-10
Subject: AGAINST A BAD LEX
Salvete Quirites,

I agree with the fine citizens who have said that the proposed lex about the Cursus Honorum is a bad lex, and I am calling all of you to vote against it.

Valete,


M•IVL•SEVERVS
SENATOR
PRÆTOR•ELECTVS
LEGATVS•PRO•PRÆTORE•PROVINCIƕMEXICO
VIAT•TR•PL•M•C•C
SCRIBA•CENSORIS•C•F•B•M
INTERPRETER
MVSÆVS•COLLEGII•ERATOVS•SODALITATIS•MVSARVM
SOCIVS•CHORI•MVSARVM

---------------------------------
Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53407 From: Sextus Lucilius Tutor Date: 2007-12-10
Subject: Re: AGAINST A BAD LEX
Salve,

where you look problem?

Vale

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "M•IVL•SEVERVS"
<marcusiuliusseverus@...> wrote:
>
> Salvete Quirites,
>
> I agree with the fine citizens who have said that the proposed lex
about the Cursus Honorum is a bad lex, and I am calling all of you to
vote against it.
>
> Valete,
>
>
> M•IVL•SEVERVS
> SENATOR
> PRÆTOR•ELECTVS
> LEGATVS•PRO•PRÆTORE•PROVINCIƕMEXICO
> VIAT•TR•PL•M•C•C
> SCRIBA•CENSORIS•C•F•B•M
> INTERPRETER
> MVSÆVS•COLLEGII•ERATOVS•SODALITATIS•MVSARVM
> SOCIVS•CHORI•MVSARVM
>
> ---------------------------------
> Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile.
Try it now.
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53408 From: M•IVL•SEVERVS Date: 2007-12-10
Subject: A BAD LEX IS A BAD LEX...
Severus Tutori omnibusque sal.

Where do I see the problem with the proposed lex about the Cursus Honorum? Allow me to quote an experienced and distinguished cives, Gnaeus Equitius Marinus:

"Nova Roma has existing laws, the Lex Vedia de Cursu Honorum and the the Lex Arminia
de Cursu Honorum, which quite adequately establish limits on who may and may not run for office. Those leges are realistic limits recognizing the size and capabilities of our community. They serve us well and do not need to be repealed. Moreover, we most certainly do not need a lex which will result in empty offices every year, as this one surely will."

That is enough for me, Tutor, especially after reading the proposal submitted by Paulinus Consul, which was already rejected in the past election.

Valete optime,


M•IVL•SEVERVS
SENATOR
PRÆTOR•ELECTVS
LEGATVS•PRO•PRÆTORE•PROVINCIƕMEXICO
VIAT•TR•PL•M•C•C
SCRIBA•CENSORIS•C•F•B•M
INTERPRETER
MVSÆVS•COLLEGII•ERATOVS•SODALITATIS•MVSARVM
SOCIVS•CHORI•MVSARVM

---------------------------------
Never miss a thing. Make Yahoo your homepage.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53409 From: marcushoratius Date: 2007-12-10
Subject: Re: Galleries
Salve optime!

Magnas gratias, mi Stoice, Sexte Lucili !

Thank you greatly for the link.

Di Deaeque te ament
Piscinus


--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Sextus Lucilius Tutor"
<phorus@...> wrote:
>
> Salvete omnes
>
> Galleries now contain more than 1,200 images of ancient Greek and
> Roman art .
>
> http://www.theoi.com/Galleries.html
>
> Valete
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53410 From: Ice Hunter Date: 2007-12-10
Subject: Re: YES on Lex Galeria de Cursu Honorum
Salve et salvete omnes,

Ti. Galerius Paulinus scripsit:

>Please review my post on how many citizens we already have who
>served in different magistracy. These citizens are available to run for
>these
>offices. Saying we will not have enough people is not accurate.

I would argue that being eligible (which those cives are) is not the same as being available. What if ten cives are eligible for two open positions and none of the ten are able (unavailable) or willing to stand for office? For the last two years we have had to hold a second election to try and fill the vacant positions. That was "with" departures from the cursus honorum.

In addition, Section VIII "fines" magistrates who resign during the last three months of their office, and you've citing an election official's resignation as an example of why this lex is needed. But what if the election official in question had resigned because they could not perform their duties due to an unforeseen crisis?

I've a friend whose mother was diagnosed with late stage bone cancer and had to take a four-month leave of absence to help move her mother in with her, sell her mother's house, and a few other arrangements that took up her time. If she were a Nova Roman, and a magistrate, and resigned the day before her term expired, would she have been punished for going to care for her dying mother? Under the proposed lex, yes. Not everyone resigns for trivial reasons. This lex does not make a distiction.

The lex is inflexible in areas that require flexibility, and for that reason I cannot support it. I urge my fellow quirites to vote antiquo.

T. Artoria Marcella

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53411 From: Maior Date: 2007-12-10
Subject: Re: AGAINST A BAD LEX
--
>
> Salvete Quirites,
I am absolutely in agreement. This lex is unRoman, we cannot
legislate behavior. Follow the mos maiorum of Roma Antiqua by your
own free choice. I took a year off willingly.
Marca Hortensia Maior
Senatrix
scriba Censoris CFBM
producer 'Vox Romana' podcast


I agree with the fine citizens who have said that the proposed lex
about the Cursus Honorum is a bad lex, and I am calling all of you
to vote against it.
>
> Valete,
>
>
> M•IVL•SEVERVS
> SENATOR
> PRÆTOR•ELECTVS
> LEGATVS•PRO•PRÆTORE•PROVINCIƕMEXICO
> VIAT•TR•PL•M•C•C
> SCRIBA•CENSORIS•C•F•B•M
> INTERPRETER
> MVSÆVS•COLLEGII•ERATOVS•SODALITATIS•MVSARVM
> SOCIVS•CHORI•MVSARVM
>
> ---------------------------------
> Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Yahoo!
Mobile. Try it now.
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53412 From: Stephen Gallagher Date: 2007-12-10
Subject: A Good Lex is a good Lex
Salve Marcus Iulius Severus

"which was already rejected in the past election."

There were three laws on the ballot during the first round election.
They were all adopted. This Lex was not on the ballot during that election.
Please get your facts straight.

As I posted earlier seven citizen in Nova Roma have already served as
Praetor, and have not yet stood for Consul. While some are more active than
others it does show that we have a ready reserve of former Praetors that can
serve as Consul if their interests and that of the Republic coincide.

Titus Octavius Pius Ahenobarbus
Gaius Flavius Diocletianus
Marcus Arminius Maior
Marcus Iulius Perusianus
Gaius Equitius Cato
Aula Tullia Scholastica
Marcus Antonius Gryllus Graecus

Seventy citizens have served as Quaestor with twenty-five to thirty
available to
serve in higher office. Some will be serving this coming year but the
others are still
available for future service if this proposal passes. Plus we add eight
each year.

There are at least fifteen citizens who have already served as Tribunes
making them
eligible right now for higher office under this proposed Lex. That doesn�t
count
the Tribunes from this year who could stand in future years. We also have
six or seven
Curule Aediles and nearly ten or so Plebeian Aediles who could offer
themselves as candidates as well.

In addition we have nine former Consuls who have not as yet served as
Censor. Each one could be elected in turn and we could fill the post for
almost the next decade. Almost a full decade without even counting the two
former Consuls that will be following behind them each and every year.

If you were to elect one of these nine former Consuls as my colleague for
the year 2762 we would then have ten former Consuls to select from in the
following year. As long as they stay citizens the number would increase by
one each year.

Vale

Tiberius Galerius Paulinus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53413 From: Stephen Gallagher Date: 2007-12-10
Subject: Re: YES on Lex Galeria de Cursu Honorum
Salve T. Artoria Marcella

"The lex is inflexible in areas that require flexibility, and for that
reason I cannot support it"

The reason we have a contio is to make legislation better or to hear what a
candidate
has to say.

What changes would give it the flexibility you would require in order to
support it and
that would not gut its intent?

I have already agreed to two changes I am willing to consider others.

Vale

Tiberius Galerius Paulinus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53414 From: Nabarz Date: 2007-12-10
Subject: Re: a.s. II diem Natalem Christi
Salve,

I guess I am a bit late to join on the thread...

Its worth remembering that the Armenian Church, one of the few churchs
that did not fall under Church of Rome and its political take over of
Christianity still celebrates birth of Christ on 6th January. Armenian
Church does recognize 25th December as birth of Christ.

Of course choosing the birth of Christ (e.g as 'light of the
world')near Winter Solstice makes good symbolic sense, however it
means Christ is then 'A' Sun god. A birthday and title he shares with
number of other Solar deities.

If you are in UK you may want to watch this programme:

Monday, December 24, 2007, Channel 4, 9-11pm.
From the CH4 website, The programme is called:

'Will the Real Jesus Please Stand Up'
'How would you feel if you discovered that the traditional story of
Jesus that begins at Christmas with the nativity wasn't quite as
unique as you might have thought?

As Christians celebrate Jesus' birth, theologian Dr Robert Beckford
investigates amazing parallels to the Christ story in other faiths.

He attempts to unravel the mystery of why there are so many versions
of the Christ story across the world and asks which is the real one,
and where it leaves the Christian story and his own belief in Jesus.'

It should be interesting programme, as part of it I did a tour of
London Mithraeum remains and we also did a section at the London City
Museum describing Mithraic artifacts there.

I think they also were planing to interview someone from Newcastle
University and visit the Mithraeums on Hadrian's Walls.

So the programme will have a fair bit of Mithraic material in it.

The programme also includes lots on Indian Hinduism and ancient
Egyptian religions, they were filming for a week in India and couple
of weeks in Egypt and Palestine. The Roman material is only one part
of the 2 hour documentary.

Regards,
Nabarz

www.myspace.com/nabarz
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53415 From: Gens Iulia Date: 2007-12-10
Subject: Re: Real temples - Petronius Dexter and Horatius
Salve M. Lucretius Agricola!:
I really appreciate your "navigation". I don't quite mind about biographies, just knowing where each citizen might be currently living, in order to figure out whether personal contact is possible or not. Or even figure out their background. It is very useful to place each post in context. All of us have different life experiences, and our native (or residence) countries also add to it. So, as an example, a writing style which can be thought as "harsh" for some citizens, could only be a standard way of expression for others. A bit like Desmond Morris' "Manwatching".
Vale bene.
Gaia Iulia Agrippa.


----- Original Message -----
From: "M. Lucretius Agricola" <wm_hogue@...>
To: <Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Sunday, December 09, 2007 9:12 PM
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Real temples - Petronius Dexter and Horatius


> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Gens Iulia" <maite_cat@...> wrote:
> >
> > Salve Marca Hortensia:
> > I've been following your posts during the past weeks. Thanks a lot
> for your answer.
> > I cannot say that our small, private, improvised rituals can be
> accounted as "practices in Buenos Aires", as I feel we are a minority.
> So far, I haven't been contacted by any Nova Roma local citizens since
> we became citizens too. I'm having a bit of problems too navigating
> the new Wiki website. As an example, while I found easily the "Gens
> Iulia" list when I applied, now I see there is no page for it at Wiki.
>
>
> Salve!
>
> Look here: http://www.novaroma.org/nr/Category:Gens_Iulia_%28Nova_Roma%29
>
> We try to be clear about the difference between ancient Roma and Nova
> Roma, so we are using the (Nova Roma) ending to mark articles about *us*.
>
> For a list of ALL members of a gens, you will have to go to the Album
> Civium. Go to your page and look carefully and you will see a link
> that will show you all gens members. We only make biography pages when
> people have held office, are priests etc. The Album Civium shows *all*
> citizens.
>
> Optime vale!
>
> Agricola
>
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.16.17/1179 - Release Date: 09/12/07 11:06 a.m.
>
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53416 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2007-12-10
Subject: Re: a.s. II diem Natalem Christi - G Equitius Cato
Cato C. Iuliae Agrippae sal.

Salve Iulia Agrippa.

And thank you for your thoughtful post.

The only thing I would disagree with you is the intent of the original
response by Aquila.

I was simply announcing a fact of the calendar year, albeit in the
Christian calendar. Whether anyone of a different religious faith
recognizes it or not, we are in fact in the season of Advent in the
Christian calendar, and no amount of disagreement - for whatever
reason - can change that.

However, Aquila seemed to turn it into a matter of some kind of
imaginary personal agenda on my part.

I certainly support his (or anyone's) right to disagree with the
tenets of the Christian faith in public here in the Forum. What I
took offense at was his implication that I was trying - in violation
of my responsibilities as a magistrate - to somehow evangelize.

In the matter of the FAQ, you certainly have a point, but let me try
to give a concrete example of what I think its intent is. A couple of
months ago, I was asked by the consul to call the Senate to order to
consider a specific item. In order to do so, as a magistrate under
the State cult, I was required to make sure that the date chosen was -
literally - auspicious. To do so, I requested that one of our
pontiffs, Fabius Modianus, take the auspices for me, which he did.
They were favorable, and the Senate was convened. In this way, as a
magistrate I was ensuring the correctness of my actions by performing
my duties under the State cult, if vicariously.

Does this make more sense?

Vale,

Cato
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53417 From: Titus Flavius Aquila Date: 2007-12-10
Subject: The senate call
Titus Flavius Aquila Tribunus Plebis omnes civibus Novae Romae SPD

Consul Galerius Paulinus has made some changes and renumbered the items below on
the 10th of December 2760 AUC (2007) with the following message:

I herby convene the Senate on pr. Non. Nov. Dec 5th) At 18:00 Roman time, 2760
A.U.C) when the contio will commence until 17:59 (Roman time)a.d. IV Id. Nov.
(December 11th , 2760 A.U.C.) when it will end. Voting will then commence at
18:00 (Roman time on (a.d. IV Id. Nov. Dec 10) and will end at 17:59 (Roman
Time) on pr. Id. Nov.( Dec 13th) 2760 A.U.C.)

SENATE AGENDA STARTS


Salvete Conscript Fathers

I have made some changes and renumbered the items below.
Please review them before we vote. If I missed something please
tell me and I will attend to it.

Valete

Tiberius Galerius Paulinus


I Appointment of Governors

Item I

The Senate appoints Titus Flavius Aquila as legatus pro praetore of
Provincia Germania

Item II

The Senate appoints Marcus Martianius Gangalius as legatus pro praetore of
Provincia Califorinia

Appointment of two Magister Aranearius

Item III

The Senate appoint M. Lucretius Agricola as Magister Aranearius

Item IV

The Senate appoint Quintus Valerius Callidus as Magister Aranearius

Both appointments will be effective pr. Kal. Ian.2760 a.u.c. ( December 31,
2760)

Item V Appointment of Editor commentariorum

The Senate appoints Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus as Editor commentariorum

Item VI Appointment of Editor commentariorum Senior

The Senate appoints Marcus Audens as Editor commentariorum Senior

Item VII

Senate Consultum on Renaming Provincia Asia Orientalis and
Provincia Asia Occidentalis

The name of Asia Orientalis is changed to Asia Ulterior, and the name
of Asia Occidentalis be changed to Asia Citerior

Item VIII

Senatus Consultum on permanent standing committees

I Creation of Permanent Standing Committees

a. In order to better organize the operations of Nova Roma and
to insure that the Consuls are provided with the necessary support
from the Senate on a wide variety of issues the following permanent
Senate committees are established:

b. The Senate Committee on Rules, The Senate Budget and Finance Committee,
The Senate Scholarship Committee, The Senate Conventus and Public Events
committee, and The Senate Committee on Provincial affairs.

c. Other permanent standing committees may be created by future
senatus consulta. Additionally, consuls may create special Senate
committees as they see fit. These special Senate committees will
exist only during the consular year of the consuls who create the
special Senate committee.

II Preliminary rules for committees

a. The maximum number of permanent standing committees that a given
senator may be appointed to is three.

b. Senators may request appointment to a committee of their choosing.

c. The current Consuls and Praetors shall serve as ex-offico non-
voting members of all permanent standing committees for their term of
office.

d. Membership on each committee shall be by consular appointment,
with no consulship appointing any more than two members to any given
committee. After a term of three years a Senator must be reappointed
to remain on the committee.

e. Committees shall consist of an odd number of senators, with no
fewer than three and no more than seven senators in any given
committee. Consuls and Praetors shall not count toward the membership
numbers of the committee unless they have been appointed as permanent
members of that committee in a previous year.

f. Each committee shall have its own chair person. The chair shall be
chosen by the permanent members of the committee each year.

III The Senate Rules Committee:

The Senate Rules Committee shall be responsible for reviewing current
Senate procedures and drafting recommendations for improving them.
The committee shall draft a Senate Handbook which shall be presented
to the Consuls for inclusion on the Senate agenda no later that the
pr. Kal. Apr 2761.

IV The Senate Budget and Finance Committee:

The Senate Budget Committee is responsible for drafting the annual
budget and reviewing any additions proposed during the year. It shall also
oversee the bank accounts of Nova Roma using any and all the tools
available for doing so. The committee shall also make recommendations
on revenue creating projects.

V The Senate Scholarship Committee:

The Senate Scholarship committee shall administer the Nova Roma
Scholarship Fund as established by the Senatus Consultum on
Scholarships.

VI The Senate Conventus and public events Committee:

The Senate Conventus and public events committee will be responsible
for organizing, coordinating and sponsoring all Nova Roma Conventum
and other public events. The committee will solicit suggestions for
venues and will plan in advance of the events. This senate committee
shall be the core of the larger Conventus Committee which will include
all those involved with planning and implementing the Nova Roma
Conventum for a given year.

VII The Senate Committee on Provincial Affairs:

The Senate Committee on Provincial affairs will make recommendation on
any and all aspects of Nova Roma's Provincial system including but not
limited to: size, location , appointment of governors and organization
of provinces.

Item IX Senatus Consultum on Scholarships

There shall be a Nova Roma Scholarship Fund. It shall be an endowment
consisting of monies set aside for the scholarship fund in past years,
additional monies added to the fund from state revenues in future
years, designated donations, and investment interest earned by the
fund.

The Nova Roma Scholarship Fund shall be invested as the Senate shall
direct, with the goal of obtaining sufficient growth through earned
interest to provide at least one annual grant to a deserving citizen
of Nova Roma.

There shall be a Nova Roma Senate Scholarship committee composed of
no fewer than three and no more than seven senators appointed to serve
terms of three years. Membership in this commission shall be by
consular appointment, with no consulship appointing any more than
three members.

Educational study grants made from the Nova Roma Scholarship Fund
shall be awarded by the Senate of Nova Roma, acting on the
recommendations of the Scholarship committee. Thus the senate may
award scholarship grants to those recommended by the commission,
and only those recommended by the commission, but may choose not to.

No later than the last day of December in each year, and normally
during November, the Consuls shall call for applications from the
citizens of Nova Roma. Applicants shall write
to the Nova Roma Senate Scholarship committee, including
in their applications:

a. An explanation of their course of study, including current student
status and educational institution.
b. How their course of study furthers knowledge of Roman matters.
c. Their involvement in organizations, projects, programs and
activities dedicated to spreading knowledge of Rome.

While most applicants are expected to be students enrolled in
universities at the advanced baccalaureate or higher level (or
equivalent for universities which don't use the
bachelor/master/doctoral divisions), applicants from outside such a
system may be considered by the Senate Scholarship committee in rare
circumstances provided they demonstrate a comparable level of
scholarship.

The Consular call for applications shall state the monetary amount
available for the grant(s) to be awarded. This amount shall normally
correspond to 90% of the interest earned by the Nova Roma Scholarship
Fund endowment since the last award was made but may, with the prior
approval of the Senate, match the interest with an equal amount from
the Scholarship Fund. In extraordinary circumstances where no awards
have been made from the fund for two or more years, the Senate
Scholarship committee shall explicitly designate the amount available
for grants, exercising due fiduciary judgment and guided by the 90% of
earned interest policy.

Applications must be received by the Senate Scholarship committee no
later than 15 January of the year in which the scholarship grant is to
be awarded.

The Senate Scholarship committee shall examine applications to
determine merit. Grants shall be awarded by the Senate based on the
Senate Scholarship committee's determinations of merit. One or more
grants may be made by the Senate depending on available funds and the
Senate Scholarship committee's review of applications.

Only those applications considered to have merit by a majority of the
committee will be forwarded to the Senate.

Grants will normally be awarded by the Ides of March of each year.


Item X

Senatus Consultum on Nova Roman bank accounts and corporate
compliance.

1. By the 8th of January of each year the Chief Financial
Officer of Nova Roma will present to the new Consuls the following
information.

a. The account numbers and location of all Nova Roma funds,
including checking, savings, Certificates of Deposit and any other
type of accounts. Additionally any revenue streams such as the
Amazon account shall likewise be reported..

b. The date or dates of any and all reports that are due to the State
of Maine for corporate compliance. If the State of incorporation
changes, this Senatus Consultum will be updated to list the current
state of incorporation.

c A copy of any filings will be sent to sent to Consuls, and the
Board of Directors of Nova Roma, Inc. i.e. the Senate.

d. The state corporation number if any.

e. Employer Identification Number (EIN) is also known as a federal
tax identification number.

2. Starting on January 2nd, 2761 a.u.c. the bank of record of Nova
Roman funds shall be directed to deliver by mail or email a full
copy of each month’s bank statement, to the Consuls. The Consuls
shall place a copy of the bank statement in the files of the Senate
yahoo site for the use by Senate members.

3a. The Censors shall provide to the Consuls and the Chief Financial
officer of Nova Roma and the resident-agent a current list of the
corporate officers and a complete list of current members of the
Board of directors of Nova Roma, Inc. i.e. the Senate. This list will
include the legal (macro national) names, postal address and email
address of each officer and board member.

3b The Chief Financial officer will then submit to the state of
incorporation the full list of corporate officers and members of the
board of directors.

4 A. In order to have our financial resources in a financial
institution with greater reach and access the Senate directs that
within 30 days of the adoption of this Senatus Consultum all funds
currently held in any Nova Roman back account, with the exception of
any Certificates of Deposit that have not matured, be transferred
to the BANK OF AMERICA (Reed) Wells Plaza, Rt. 1, Wells, Maine. The
Bank of America is a bank with "global reach". It has branches in
twenty countries including ones in Asia, Europe, Middle East,
Africa, Latin America the U.S. and Canada. As soon as any
Certificates of Deposit mature those funds will also be transferred
to the BANK OF AMERICA (Reed) Wells Plaza, Rt. 1, Wells, Maine.

B. The Senate further directs that the Consuls and the Senate shall
be notified when the transfer has been accomplished.

5. The online accounting program QuickBooks shall be used to keep the
financial information so as to facilitate the easy transfer of
information between the Senate, Magistrates and the Chief Financial
Officer of Nova Roma. Beginning with the budget year 2761 a.u.c
it shall be paid for as a budget item.

https://login.quickbooks.com/

6. As of February 1st 2761 Nova Roma, Inc., will contract for the
services of a resident-agent for the State of Maine from a national
company that specializes in such services. The resident agent shall
not be a citizen or former citizen of Nova Roma.

This service can be obtained for about $100.00 per annum.

Some suggested sites:

http://registeredagentinfo.com/

http://www.eresidentagent.com/

http://www.registeredagent.com/default.asp


The Senate adds the following sections to the Senatus Consultum establishing
priorities for Nova Roma which was Adopted 31 August 2757.
Nothing in these or any other section will, in and of itself require
the expenditure of any money without subsequent overt action on the part
of the Senate

This Senatus Consultum can be found here:

http://www.novaroma.org/tabularium/senate/2004-08-31-results.html


Item XI

Ib Nova Roma sets as one of its short term goals the reacquisition,
either by loan, rent, purchase or donation a Roman Temple
for use of the citizens of Nova Roma. Short term is defined as with in
5-7 years

Item XII

Ic Nova Roma sets as one of its long term goals the acquisition of at least
108
contiguous acres on which to build a capital city for the administration of
our culture. The exact site for this governmental and spiritual capital city
is to be determined. Long term is defined as anything over 8 years.


Item XIII

Senatus Consultum On an agreement between the Senate and the Pontifex
Maximus

In order to move the religious institutions of the Republic forward
the following benchmarks are established between the Senate and
the Pontifex Maximus for the year 2761.

1. The Pontifex Maximus shall personally convene the Collegium Pontificum.
at least once a month for at least eight over the next year.

2. The Pontifex Maximus shall contact every member of the Priesthood to
ascertain their status, and either assist them in getting active again or
remove them if they're no longer interested.

3. The Pontifex Maximus will see to it that the minor priesthoods start
getting direct instruction from either himself or appointed members of the
CP, including providing them with rites and what to do with them. Prior
expectations of self motivation on the "historically independent"
priesthoods has not worked so central direction would be provided.

4. The Pontifex Maximus will publish to the wiki and or website at least
four
scholarly articles on the Religio during the next twelve months. He will
also encourage others to add scholarly articles on the Wiki or website.

5. In order to better research the ancient sources the Pontifex Maximus
agrees
to undertake and pass a study of Latin now and ancient Greek in the near
future

6 The Pontifex Maximus shall help to create on film at least four rites
of the Religio for the educational uses of citizens of Nova Roma

7 Rebuild the Religio section of the NR website/ wiki.

8. Build a "Religio Romana Weblog" to the Religio site, detailing work done
so that the Citizens can get continual information on what's happening with
the Religio. This will be updated by the Pontifex Maximus or he shall
appoint a member of the CP to do so..

9. The Hold at least 12 major religious rites in the next year, one per
month. (Unfortunately this would be the same sort of public deal as we've
had before, where everyone is invited to "share on their own" and then talk
about results as a community. That's the limit of our current
resources/technology.)

10 Improve the religious calendar pages on the NR website/wiki

11. The Pontifex Maximus will Participate in the Religio Romana list
and on the main list

12 The Senate for its part agrees to order the posting on the Wiki of a
clear statement that our real world goals include, as part of the
reestablishment
of the Religio Romana, the establishment of a spiritual and administrative
center
that would function as our world capital.

13. On of about December 1st , 2761 the Pontifex Maximus will convene the
Collegium
Pontificum. The agenda for the December meeting shall include a vote of
confidence
in the Pontifex Maximus performance in the year 2761. If a majority votes
that the Pontifex Maximus has attended to his duties for the year including
the above, he shall remain in office. If a majority votes that the Pontifex
Maximus has NOT attended to his duties the for the year the office shall be
declared vacant and the Collegium Pontificum shall elect a new Pontifex
Maximus according to its rules.

Valete bene
Titus Flavius Aquila
Tribunis Plebis
Scriba Censoris KFBM
Nova Roma


__________________________________ Ihr erstes Fernweh? Wo gibt es den schönsten Strand? www.yahoo.de/clever

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53418 From: Maior Date: 2007-12-10
Subject: Re: a.s. II diem Natalem Christi
Salve Nabarz;

No, you are not too late at all. Most of us here are not in England,
as we would love to watch your programme. I would buy it.

I am in the U.S., Gaia Iulia in Argentina, Tutor in the Czech
republic, Minervalis France, Aquila Germany.

So would you explain is Persian Mithras (Mehr) the same as Roman
Mithras? And is December 25th the birth of the hero Mithras from the
All Virgin Anahita?

Many people here, hear that this holiday is something unique to
Christianity and need to know the historical syncretic roots of
Christmas.

Any scholarly references would be appreciated! We could write an
article for our NRwiki, in fact a Mithras section would be ideal.
bene vale
Marca Hortensia Maior
>
> 'Will the Real Jesus Please Stand Up'
> 'How would you feel if you discovered that the traditional story of
> Jesus that begins at Christmas with the nativity wasn't quite as
> unique as you might have thought?
>
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53419 From: David Kling (Modianus) Date: 2007-12-10
Subject: Re: A Good Lex is a good Lex
Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus Tiberio Galerio Paulino salutem dicit

Your argument is rubbish!

By your own flawed logic if we have 200+ tax paying citizens then we
have 200+ potential candidates for quaestor. But we didn't have that
many did we? We had to have two elections for quaestor because we
didn't have enough the first time, and the only office that was
contested was the one that you ran for.

You can sing the praises of your Lex all day... but if you gold plate
a turd it is still a turd!

Vale:

Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus

On Dec 10, 2007 3:23 PM, Stephen Gallagher <spqr753@...> wrote:
> Salve Marcus Iulius Severus
>
> "which was already rejected in the past election."
>
> There were three laws on the ballot during the first round election.
> They were all adopted. This Lex was not on the ballot during that election.
> Please get your facts straight.
>
> As I posted earlier seven citizen in Nova Roma have already served as
> Praetor, and have not yet stood for Consul. While some are more active than
> others it does show that we have a ready reserve of former Praetors that can
> serve as Consul if their interests and that of the Republic coincide.
>
> Titus Octavius Pius Ahenobarbus
> Gaius Flavius Diocletianus
> Marcus Arminius Maior
> Marcus Iulius Perusianus
> Gaius Equitius Cato
> Aula Tullia Scholastica
> Marcus Antonius Gryllus Graecus
>
> Seventy citizens have served as Quaestor with twenty-five to thirty
> available to
> serve in higher office. Some will be serving this coming year but the
> others are still
> available for future service if this proposal passes. Plus we add eight
> each year.
>
> There are at least fifteen citizens who have already served as Tribunes
> making them
> eligible right now for higher office under this proposed Lex. That doesn't
> count
> the Tribunes from this year who could stand in future years. We also have
> six or seven
> Curule Aediles and nearly ten or so Plebeian Aediles who could offer
> themselves as candidates as well.
>
> In addition we have nine former Consuls who have not as yet served as
> Censor. Each one could be elected in turn and we could fill the post for
> almost the next decade. Almost a full decade without even counting the two
> former Consuls that will be following behind them each and every year.
>
> If you were to elect one of these nine former Consuls as my colleague for
> the year 2762 we would then have ten former Consuls to select from in the
> following year. As long as they stay citizens the number would increase by
> one each year.
>
> Vale
>
> Tiberius Galerius Paulinus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53420 From: M•IVL•SEVERVS Date: 2007-12-10
Subject: GOOD LEX?
Salve Consul et salvete omnes,

You're right in one point, and I apoligize for not getting my facts straight, about the lex on Cursus Honorum being rejected before... But I still think it is a bad law, and I call again all the citizens of Nova Roma to vote against it. As Modianus Censor just wrote: if you gold plate a turd, it's still a turd!

Valete,


M•IVL•SEVERVS
SENATOR
PRÆTOR•ELECTVS
LEGATVS•PRO•PRÆTORE•PROVINCIƕMEXICO
SCRIBA•CENSORIS•C•F•B•M
INTERPRETER
MVSÆVS•COLLEGII•ERATOVS•SODALITATIS•MVSARVM
SOCIVS•CHORI•MVSARVM

---------------------------------
Looking for last minute shopping deals? Find them fast with Yahoo! Search.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53421 From: Michael Echevarria Date: 2007-12-10
Subject: Re: a.s. II diem Natalem Christi - G Equitius Cato
Salve,

Why does it have to turn into a huge argument when one disagrees with another citizens religion?? If someone was offended by the original post then let it be. As was stated before we have a right to disagree with whatever is posted here in the ML. Why should citizens start barking up someone's tree if they felt offended by a post?? If the post was not to be taken offensively or not meant as Christian Propaganda then simply state so. Was it meant as Christian Propaganda?? Maybe not, but for some reason when words are written about Christianity that may sound remotely negative most of the Christians start to attack and seem to go on a rampage. No one wants to turn this into some religious standoff.

Lucius Iulius Regulus

Gaius Equitius Cato <mlcinnyc@...> wrote:
Cato C. Iuliae Agrippae sal.

Salve Iulia Agrippa.

And thank you for your thoughtful post.

The only thing I would disagree with you is the intent of the original
response by Aquila.

I was simply announcing a fact of the calendar year, albeit in the
Christian calendar. Whether anyone of a different religious faith
recognizes it or not, we are in fact in the season of Advent in the
Christian calendar, and no amount of disagreement - for whatever
reason - can change that.

However, Aquila seemed to turn it into a matter of some kind of
imaginary personal agenda on my part.

I certainly support his (or anyone's) right to disagree with the
tenets of the Christian faith in public here in the Forum. What I
took offense at was his implication that I was trying - in violation
of my responsibilities as a magistrate - to somehow evangelize.

In the matter of the FAQ, you certainly have a point, but let me try
to give a concrete example of what I think its intent is. A couple of
months ago, I was asked by the consul to call the Senate to order to
consider a specific item. In order to do so, as a magistrate under
the State cult, I was required to make sure that the date chosen was -
literally - auspicious. To do so, I requested that one of our
pontiffs, Fabius Modianus, take the auspices for me, which he did.
They were favorable, and the Senate was convened. In this way, as a
magistrate I was ensuring the correctness of my actions by performing
my duties under the State cult, if vicariously.

Does this make more sense?

Vale,

Cato






---------------------------------
Looking for last minute shopping deals? Find them fast with Yahoo! Search.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53422 From: Nabarz Date: 2007-12-10
Subject: Re: a.s. II diem Natalem Christi
Salve,

That sentence should read: "Armenian Church does NOT recognize 25th
December as birth of Christ."

Regards,
Nabarz
--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Nabarz" <nabarz@...> wrote:
>
>
> Salve,
>
> I guess I am a bit late to join on the thread...
>
> Its worth remembering that the Armenian Church, one of the few churchs
> that did not fall under Church of Rome and its political take over of
> Christianity still celebrates birth of Christ on 6th January. Armenian
> Church does not recognize 25th December as birth of Christ.
>
> Of course choosing the birth of Christ (e.g as 'light of the
> world')near Winter Solstice makes good symbolic sense, however it
> means Christ is then 'A' Sun god. A birthday and title he shares with
> number of other Solar deities.
>
> If you are in UK you may want to watch this programme:
>
> Monday, December 24, 2007, Channel 4, 9-11pm.
> From the CH4 website, The programme is called:
>
> 'Will the Real Jesus Please Stand Up'
> 'How would you feel if you discovered that the traditional story of
> Jesus that begins at Christmas with the nativity wasn't quite as
> unique as you might have thought?
>
> As Christians celebrate Jesus' birth, theologian Dr Robert Beckford
> investigates amazing parallels to the Christ story in other faiths.
>
> He attempts to unravel the mystery of why there are so many versions
> of the Christ story across the world and asks which is the real one,
> and where it leaves the Christian story and his own belief in Jesus.'
>
> It should be interesting programme, as part of it I did a tour of
> London Mithraeum remains and we also did a section at the London City
> Museum describing Mithraic artifacts there.
>
> I think they also were planing to interview someone from Newcastle
> University and visit the Mithraeums on Hadrian's Walls.
>
> So the programme will have a fair bit of Mithraic material in it.
>
> The programme also includes lots on Indian Hinduism and ancient
> Egyptian religions, they were filming for a week in India and couple
> of weeks in Egypt and Palestine. The Roman material is only one part
> of the 2 hour documentary.
>
> Regards,
> Nabarz
>
> www.myspace.com/nabarz
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53423 From: Maior Date: 2007-12-10
Subject: Re: a.s. II diem Natalem Christi
Salve Nabarz:
yes, a number of Orthodox Christian churches, are on the old
Julian calendar, but since the new cultus, Christians, made the
birth date of the solar diety their celebration as well circa the
5th century A.D., does it matter?
Maior
> >
> >
> > Salve,
> >
> > I guess I am a bit late to join on the thread...
> >
> > Its worth remembering that the Armenian Church, one of the few
churchs
> > that did not fall under Church of Rome and its political take
over of
> > Christianity still celebrates birth of Christ on 6th January.
Armenian
> > Church does not recognize 25th December as birth of Christ.
> >
> > Of course choosing the birth of Christ (e.g as 'light of the
> > world')near Winter Solstice makes good symbolic sense, however it
> > means Christ is then 'A' Sun god. A birthday and title he shares
with
> > number of other Solar deities.
> >
> > If you are in UK you may want to watch this programme:
> >
> > Monday, December 24, 2007, Channel 4, 9-11pm.
> > From the CH4 website, The programme is called:
> >
> > 'Will the Real Jesus Please Stand Up'
> > 'How would you feel if you discovered that the traditional story
of
> > Jesus that begins at Christmas with the nativity wasn't quite as
> > unique as you might have thought?
> >
> > As Christians celebrate Jesus' birth, theologian Dr Robert
Beckford
> > investigates amazing parallels to the Christ story in other
faiths.
> >
> > He attempts to unravel the mystery of why there are so many
versions
> > of the Christ story across the world and asks which is the real
one,
> > and where it leaves the Christian story and his own belief in
Jesus.'
> >
> > It should be interesting programme, as part of it I did a tour of
> > London Mithraeum remains and we also did a section at the London
City
> > Museum describing Mithraic artifacts there.
> >
> > I think they also were planing to interview someone from
Newcastle
> > University and visit the Mithraeums on Hadrian's Walls.
> >
> > So the programme will have a fair bit of Mithraic material in it.
> >
> > The programme also includes lots on Indian Hinduism and ancient
> > Egyptian religions, they were filming for a week in India and
couple
> > of weeks in Egypt and Palestine. The Roman material is only one
part
> > of the 2 hour documentary.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Nabarz
> >
> > www.myspace.com/nabarz
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53424 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2007-12-10
Subject: Re: a.s. II diem Natalem Christi - G Equitius Cato
Cato L. Iulio Regulo sal.

Salve Iulius Regulus.

My original response had nothing to do with Christianity per se; it
has to do with the right of any citizen to speak as they wish, freely,
no matter who or what they are. That is something I think worth
protecting.

Vale,

Cato
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53425 From: Nabarz Date: 2007-12-10
Subject: Re: a.s. II diem Natalem Christi
Salve Maior,


An interesting academic paper on Persian Mithra, Roman Mithras and
Christ connection is on:
http://www.cais-soas.com/CAIS/Religions/iranian/Mithraism/mithra.htm

Roman Mithras was a syncretic religion; a mixture of Greek, Roman and
Persian.

Here is a short excerpt from chapter 9 ‘Four Stations of Mithra’ in
‘The Mysteries of Mithras: The Pagan Belief That Shaped the Christian
World’ (Inner Traditions, 2005).

YULEâ€"BIRTH OF THE SUN
By Nabarz

At Yule night the clouds are breaking
Pour Old Wine into the cup
Friends celebrate this night
When does god give you a second life?
- A traditional Persian Yule poem, translation by Nabarz

Yule is the time of the rebirth of the sun, identified variously as
Lugh, Mabon, Arthur, Mithras, Christ, Horus. In the Persian calendar,
Yule is called Yalda or Shab-e Yalda and is celebrated on December 21.
It is the time of the winter solstice; it is the eve of the birth of
Mithra.

According to Massumeh Price, 'The Persians adopted their annual
renewal festival from the Babylonians and incorporated it into the
rituals of their own Zoroastrian religion. The last day of the Persian
month Azar is the longest night of the year, when the forces of
Ahriman are assumed to be at the peak of their strength. The next day,
the first day of the month “Day” known as “khoram rooz” or “khore
rooz” (the day of sun) belongs to Ahura Mazda, the Lord of Wisdom.
Since the days are getting longer and the nights shorter, this day
marks the victory of Sun over the darkness. The occasion was
celebrated in the festival of “Daygan” dedicated to Ahura Mazda, on
the first day of the month “Day.” Fires would be burnt all night to
ensure the defeat of the forces of Ahriman. There would be feasts,
acts of charity and a number of deities were honoured, and prayers
performed to ensure the total victory of sun that was essential for
the protection of winter crops. There would be prayers to Mithra
(Mehr) and feasts in his honour, since Mithra is the Eyzad responsible
for protecting “the light of the early morning,” known as “Havangah.”
It was also assumed that Ahura Mazda would grant people’s wishes;
especially those with no offspring had the hope to be blessed with
children if they performed all rites on this occasion. One of the
themes of the festival was the temporary subversion of order. Masters
and servants reversed roles. The king dressed in white would change
place with ordinary people. A mock king was crowned and masquerades
spilled into the streets. As the old year died, rules of ordinary
living were relaxed. This tradition persisted till the Sassanian
period, and is mentioned by Biruni and others in their recordings of
pre-Islamic rituals and festivals. Its origin goes back to the
Babylonian New Year celebration. These people believed the first
creation was order that came out of chaos. To appreciate and celebrate
the first creation, they had a festival and all roles were reversed.
Disorder and chaos ruled for a day and eventually order was restored
and succeeded at the end of the festival.1

Furthermore, according to the Web site iranheritage.com:
It was said that Mithra was born out of the light that came from
within the Alborz Mountains. Ancient Iranians would gather in caves
along the mountain range throughout the night to witness this miracle
together at dawn. They were known as “Yar-e Ghar” (Cave Mates). In
Iran today, despite the advent of Islam and Muslim rituals, Shab-e
Yalda is still celebrated widely. It is a time when friends and family
gather together to eat, drink and read poetry (especially Hafiz) until
well after midnight. Fruits and nuts are eaten, and pomegranates and
watermelons are particularly significant. The red colour in these
fruits symbolizes the crimson hues of dawn and the glow of life,
invoking the splendour of Mithra. Because Shab-e Yalda is the longest
and darkest night, it has come to symbolize many things in Persian
poetry: separation from a loved one, loneliness and waiting. After
Shab-e Yalda a transformation takes placeâ€"the waiting is over, light
shines and goodness prevails. As poet Saadi says:

The sight of you each morning is a New Year
Any night of your departure is the eve of Yule (Sa’adi)
With all my pains, there is still the hope of recovery
Like the eve of Yule, there will finally be an end (Sa’adi).2

Some years ago I tried to capture the spirit of Yule and its essence
as a international global festival by writing this Yule poem:

Yule
The sun is setting low on the western horizon.
Sky serpent swallowing him once more
Yule night has arrived; sun’s longest slumbers.

We eat and drink all that is red
Wine, pomegranate, and watermelon,
The color of dawn, reminders of what we eagerly wait for.

Shamash, Marduk, Sekhmet,
Descending immortals, you’ll rise again
Apollo, Ra, salutations to you.

Good night Osiris, weak and tired lying in your coffin,
Enclosed by darkness, tricked by Seth again!
An infant sun is born, Horus soaring up into the sky.

Mithras, born of a rock and out from the cave,
Becoming Sol Invictus and turning the wheel
Darkness, now a fading memory.

The Oak king sings outside, as the Holly king lays slain
Dawn has arrived, Yule has ended.
Drink up your wine.

The above article is a short excerpt from chapter 9 ‘Four Stations of
Mithra’ in ‘The Mysteries of Mithras: The Pagan Belief That Shaped the
Christian World’ (Inner Traditions, 2005).

References:
1. www.persianoutpost.com/htdocs/yalda.html
2. www.iranheritage.com/programmes/yalda_back.htm

Regards,
Nabarz

http://www.myspace.com/nabarz

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Maior" <rory12001@...> wrote:
>
> Salve Nabarz;
>
> No, you are not too late at all. Most of us here are not in England,
> as we would love to watch your programme. I would buy it.
>
> I am in the U.S., Gaia Iulia in Argentina, Tutor in the Czech
> republic, Minervalis France, Aquila Germany.
>
> So would you explain is Persian Mithras (Mehr) the same as Roman
> Mithras? And is December 25th the birth of the hero Mithras from the
> All Virgin Anahita?
>
> Many people here, hear that this holiday is something unique to
> Christianity and need to know the historical syncretic roots of
> Christmas.
>
> Any scholarly references would be appreciated! We could write an
> article for our NRwiki, in fact a Mithras section would be ideal.
> bene vale
> Marca Hortensia Maior
> >
> > 'Will the Real Jesus Please Stand Up'
> > 'How would you feel if you discovered that the traditional story of
> > Jesus that begins at Christmas with the nativity wasn't quite as
> > unique as you might have thought?
> >
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53426 From: Patrick D. Owen Date: 2007-12-10
Subject: AGONALIA TOMORROW - DEC 11. (NP)
Agonalia (dies NP)

As NR currently lacks a rex sacrorum, the Pontifex Maximus and
pontifices should offer sacrifice on behalf of the well-being of the
Senate and People of Nova Roma.

The Romans celebrated the Agonalia three times each year, on January
9, May 21, and December 11. The Roman king Numa Pompilius is supposed
to have created these festivals. The person in charge of the sacrifice
(of a ram) was the rex sacrificulus, and the sacrifice was made in the
regia. Although the purpose of the holiday was disputed among the
ancient Romans, William Smith, in the Agonialia (Agonia) article in A
Dictionary of Greek and Roman Antiquities (1875) says it was probably
for the well-being of the state. The rex sacrificulus was created
after the kings were expelled to carry on the religious function of
the king. This priestly position was higher in terms of the religious
hierarchy than the pontifex maximus, but the role fell into disuse
during the late Republic, and the power and influence of the pontifex
maximus was higher.

Fl. Galerius Aurelianus,
fl. Cer.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53427 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2007-12-10
Subject: Re: a.s. II diem Natalem Christi
Cato M. Hortensiae Maiori omnibusque SPD

Salve et salvete.

Maior, Sextus Iulius Africanus popularized the idea that Christ was
born on 25 December in his Chronographiai, a reference book for
Christians written about AD 221; it was based on the
traditionally-held date of the Annunciation on 25 March. An ancient
Jewish belief (adopted by Christianity) held that prophets died on the
same day as either their birth or conception; the earliest date of
Christ's Crucifixion was held to be 25 March, and since gestation in
humans takes (usually) nine months, you end up with 25 December. In
the Iulian Calendar, that day now falls on 7 January (in the years AD
1900-2099), hence the celebration on that date in many of the Eastern
Churches.

The celebration of the birth of Sol Invictus was first popularized by
the Emperor Aurelian in AD 274.

Vale,

Cato
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53428 From: marcushoratius Date: 2007-12-10
Subject: Re: a.s. II diem Natalem Christi
M Moravius C. Catoni SPD:

That's interesting as it explains something to me, but also not.
Until about 336 CE the birth of Jesus was celebrated on 28 March in
Milan. That goes along with the idea of his death around the vernal
equinox, as the Mithraic slaying of the bull is also to suggest,
being on the same day as the day of his birth, which the Apocalyps
posed as having occured with the coming of the Lamb "between the ox
and the ram," or in other words on the cusp between Taurus and
Aries. So the reference in the Apocalyps would be to both his birth
and his death.

But then you say the other possible date would have been considered
the date of conception. And what date is this given in the
liturgical claendar? It is not 25 December, is it?


--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Gaius Equitius Cato"
<mlcinnyc@...> wrote:
>
> Cato M. Hortensiae Maiori omnibusque SPD
>
> Salve et salvete.
>
> Maior, Sextus Iulius Africanus popularized the idea that Christ was
> born on 25 December in his Chronographiai, a reference book for
> Christians written about AD 221; it was based on the
> traditionally-held date of the Annunciation on 25 March. An ancient
> Jewish belief (adopted by Christianity) held that prophets died on
the
> same day as either their birth or conception; the earliest date of
> Christ's Crucifixion was held to be 25 March, and since gestation in
> humans takes (usually) nine months, you end up with 25 December. In
> the Iulian Calendar, that day now falls on 7 January (in the years
AD
> 1900-2099), hence the celebration on that date in many of the
Eastern
> Churches.
>
> The celebration of the birth of Sol Invictus was first popularized
by
> the Emperor Aurelian in AD 274.
>
> Vale,
>
> Cato
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53429 From: Maior Date: 2007-12-10
Subject: Re: a.s. II diem Natalem Christi
Maior Catoni quiritesque sal;

Salve Cato, thanks but I'm not terribly interested in Sol Invictus,
who is merely the Bal-Shamim of Palmyra and really a weather god. As
with most gods he got conflated with the sun god;-)
Here is a great book about the gods of Palmyra:
"The Religious Life of Palmyra" Ted Kazser

http://ccat.sas.upenn.edu/bmcr/2003/2003-07-09.html

The Jewish god El, came from Ugarit and combined with the local
baal of the Canaanites.
Prof Mark S. Smith has written the leading text on this topic:
"The Origins of Biblical Monotheism: Israel's Polytheistic
background and the Ugaritic Texts" Oxford Univeristy Press 2003 and

"Did God have a Wife: Archeology and folk religion in Ancient Israel"
by William Dever. Eerdmans 2005, the answer is yes, Asherah. Dever
is a first classe biblical archeologist.

But enough of that, I'm interested in Zorastrianism, it's where the
concept of one god, angels, devils, heaven, hell, virgin birth, last
judgement, a savior - Sayoshants, all come from.
The Prophet Zoroaster dates about 6000 BC. but this is Nabarz'
beat as he is Irani and a scholar.
bene vale
Maior

Maior, Sextus Iulius Africanus popularized the idea that Christ was
> born on 25 December in his Chronographiai, a reference book for
> Christians written about AD 221; it was based on the
> traditionally-held date of the Annunciation on 25 March. An
ancient
> Jewish belief (adopted by Christianity) held that prophets died on
the
> same day as either their birth or conception; the earliest date of
> Christ's Crucifixion was held to be 25 March, and since gestation
in
> humans takes (usually) nine months, you end up with 25 December.
In
> the Iulian Calendar, that day now falls on 7 January (in the years
AD
> 1900-2099), hence the celebration on that date in many of the
Eastern
> Churches.
>
> The celebration of the birth of Sol Invictus was first popularized
by
> the Emperor Aurelian in AD 274.
>
> Vale,
>
> Cato
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53430 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2007-12-10
Subject: Re: a.s. II diem Natalem Christi
Cato M. Moravio Piscino sal.

Salve moravius Piscinus.

Well, His conception would have been at the Annunciation, celebrated
as 25 March.

It would sort of work back like this:

Crucifixion, 25 March. Because of the belief in the correlation
between death and conception *or* birth, Annunciation set as 25 March.
Nine months from conception to birth becomes 25 December.

One note about Mithraism, coming from one of Hortensia Maior's
favorite books:

"The form of the [Mithraic] cult most familiar to us, the initiatory
cult, does not seem to derive from Persia at all. It is found first in
the west, has no significant resemblance to its supposed Persian
'origins', and seems largely to be a western construct." - Beard,
Mary, John North and Simon Price. Religions of Rome Volume I,
Cambridge University Press. New York, 1998

Vale,

Cato
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53431 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2007-12-10
Subject: Re: a.s. II diem Natalem Christi
Cato M. Hortensiae Maiori sal.

Salve Marca Hortensia.

You contradict yourself (again). You wrote:

"[Christians] made the birth date of the solar diety [sic] their
celebration as well circa the 5th century A.D."

I showed you that this is incorrect, and why, and you immediately
disown any interest in Sol Invictus - the very same solar deity to
whom *you* first made reference - and start wandering off on some tangent.

If you want to support your statement above, please do so. I don't
mind an interesting discussion, and Christianity can certainly survive
a plethora of your misconceptions and half-baked criticisms, but
please at least try to remain focussed on a single cohesive train of
thought.

Vale,

Cato
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53432 From: Maior Date: 2007-12-10
Subject: Re: a.s. II diem Natalem Christi
M. Hortensia Catoni spd;

because Cato, I was talking about Mithras, not Sol Invictus. As for
John North that is a nice quote. But he is a classicist not an
Iranianologist.

Iranianologists are specialists in Avestan and the neighboring
languages. You find this same problem with Classicists in the Roman
East; they don't know any Semitic languages. For a long time
classicists said Cybele was not Hittite Kubaba, but Mark Munn, who
knows Hittite showed the relationship. For the region go to the
regional expert.
bene vale
Maior

>
> "[Christians] made the birth date of the solar diety [sic] their
> celebration as well circa the 5th century A.D."
>
> I showed you that this is incorrect, and why, and you immediately
> disown any interest in Sol Invictus - the very same solar deity to
> whom *you* first made reference - and start wandering off on some
tangent.
>
> If you want to support your statement above, please do so. I don't
> mind an interesting discussion, and Christianity can certainly
survive
> a plethora of your misconceptions and half-baked criticisms, but
> please at least try to remain focussed on a single cohesive train
of
> thought.
>
> Vale,
>
> Cato
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53433 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2007-12-10
Subject: Re: a.s. II diem Natalem Christi
Cato M. Hortensiae Maiori sal.

salve, Marca Hortensia.

Then you should follow your own advice:

"Since the function of its mysteries was to relate the initiate to
Mithras, the cult was of course centred entirely on the person of the
god. His cult title was "Deus Sol Invictus Mithras": thus, he was
"god," he was "the Sun," he was "unconquered," he was "Mithras." To
his identity as the Sun and to his invincibility must be added his
Persian-ness, a "fact" known to outsiders as well as to his initiates.
Iconographically, he is depicted in exotic non-Roman, specifically
oriental garb: trousers and the "Persian" cap. Gods have their
personal histories. The story of Mithras survives not in written form
derived from an oral narrative — if such there ever was, it has
disappeared without trace — but as scenes preserved on what are
collectively termed "the monuments," for the most part as relief
sculpture on icons, altars, etcetera, but also as statuary and in
fresco on the walls of mithraea. In the frescos and on the great
complex reliefs (the latter mostly from the Rhine and Danube frontier
provinces) a selection of side-scenes representing various episodes
surrounds the central scene, the god's sacrificial killing of a bull.
More often this "tauroctony" is a self-contained icon, and from its
privileged location at the head of the central aisle we know that it
was the cult's principal icon; consequently, that the bull-killing was
the main event in the Mithras myth. (The fundamental illustrated
catalogue of Mithraic monuments is Vermaseren 1956-60. Merkelback 1984
and Clauss 2000 are also exceptionally well illustrated. On the
iconography of Mithras, see Vollkommer 1992." - Martin Beck,
Encyclopedia Iranica (http://www.iranica.com/newsite/)

Vale,

Cato
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53434 From: Michael Echevarria Date: 2007-12-10
Subject: Re: a.s. II diem Natalem Christi
Salve,

Christianity does have similarities with Zoroastriniasm and many devout Christians say that is false. They like to believe their religion is unique but in fact it isnt. They should look up the history of their faith before they cross themselves. Some do not realize that they could be giving praise to some other Creator, some other Virgin Mother, and placing their fear into some other religions Devil. The problem is also within the private Christian schools because they do not teach the students the real history of Christianity and so the cycle continues. It might just be because they might lose their tight grip on the masses. I believe this is a great discussion considering the time of the season.

Lucius Iulius Regulus

Maior <rory12001@...> wrote:
Maior Catoni quiritesque sal;

Salve Cato, thanks but I'm not terribly interested in Sol Invictus,
who is merely the Bal-Shamim of Palmyra and really a weather god. As
with most gods he got conflated with the sun god;-)
Here is a great book about the gods of Palmyra:
"The Religious Life of Palmyra" Ted Kazser

http://ccat.sas.upenn.edu/bmcr/2003/2003-07-09.html

The Jewish god El, came from Ugarit and combined with the local
baal of the Canaanites.
Prof Mark S. Smith has written the leading text on this topic:
"The Origins of Biblical Monotheism: Israel's Polytheistic
background and the Ugaritic Texts" Oxford Univeristy Press 2003 and

"Did God have a Wife: Archeology and folk religion in Ancient Israel"
by William Dever. Eerdmans 2005, the answer is yes, Asherah. Dever
is a first classe biblical archeologist.

But enough of that, I'm interested in Zorastrianism, it's where the
concept of one god, angels, devils, heaven, hell, virgin birth, last
judgement, a savior - Sayoshants, all come from.
The Prophet Zoroaster dates about 6000 BC. but this is Nabarz'
beat as he is Irani and a scholar.
bene vale
Maior

Maior, Sextus Iulius Africanus popularized the idea that Christ was
> born on 25 December in his Chronographiai, a reference book for
> Christians written about AD 221; it was based on the
> traditionally-held date of the Annunciation on 25 March. An
ancient
> Jewish belief (adopted by Christianity) held that prophets died on
the
> same day as either their birth or conception; the earliest date of
> Christ's Crucifixion was held to be 25 March, and since gestation
in
> humans takes (usually) nine months, you end up with 25 December.
In
> the Iulian Calendar, that day now falls on 7 January (in the years
AD
> 1900-2099), hence the celebration on that date in many of the
Eastern
> Churches.
>
> The celebration of the birth of Sol Invictus was first popularized
by
> the Emperor Aurelian in AD 274.
>
> Vale,
>
> Cato
>






---------------------------------
Never miss a thing. Make Yahoo your homepage.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53435 From: Maior Date: 2007-12-10
Subject: Re: a.s. II diem Natalem Christi
Maior Catoni sal;:
Cato, frankly I am not interested in your Orthodox supersitio. Go
argue with Narbarz, who knows the topic.

In Hibernia I had an ardent suitor who talked at me nonstop for over
2 hours about his R.C. superstitio. At the market I read about the
Islamic superstito & the supremancy of Allah. The Jewish Hasids want
me to acknowlege Yahweh, the supreme Caananite-Hittite god. The
Zoroastrians, thank the gods, leave me alone.

How can I say this;
I am in Nova Roma to live my Romanitas and honour the gods.
bene vale in pacem deorum
Marca Hortensia Maior
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53436 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2007-12-10
Subject: Re: NO on Lex Galeria de Cursu Honorum
Salve Consul Galerius,

> Please review my post on how many citizens we already have who
> served in different magistracy. These citizens are available to run for
> these
> offices. Saying we will not have enough people is not accurate.

The fact that people have held office in the past doesn't mean they're
available now. Just look at our recent elections, and the fact you
had to call a second election because we had insufficient candidates
under even our current rules.

> We have at least seven people who could stand for Consul,
> nine that could stand for Censor and dozens more who could
> stand for the other offices

Yet quite obviously we did not see them stand. Only the censura was
contended. We had just enough people stand for the consulate and the
praetura to fill the offices. We're having to hold a by-election now
to fill a number of other magistracies.

> The sky is not falling.

I didn't say it was. I said your lex is a bad idea, and I'm
recommending against it for exactly the same reasons I recommended
against it last month.

Vale,

CN-EQVIT-MARINVS
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53437 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2007-12-10
Subject: Re: a.s. II diem Natalem Christi
Cato M. Hortensiae Maiori sal.

Salve, Marca Hortensia.

OK, I just want to get this straight.

You tell me that Christians put Jesus' birth on the 25th of December
in place of a solar deity in the 5th century AD. I show that you are
wrong.

You then claim that I am speaking about the "wrong" solar deity, and
tell me to start using experts - specifically "Iranianologists"
(which, for clarities' sake, is not actually a word, nor is
"Iranianology" a course of study). I show you that you are wrong,
using an expert in Iranian/Persian history.

And that leads you to a crass attack on some kind of "Orthodox
superstitio"....how, exactly?

Typically, when you are losing an argument, you blaze off in some
unrelated, inconsequential tangent. Kudos, you have stayed in form.

Vale,

Cato
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53438 From: marcushoratius Date: 2007-12-10
Subject: a. d. III Eidus Decembris
M. Moravius Piscinus Horatianus Quiritibus et omnibus salutem
plurimam dicit: Ita vos Di Deaeque bene ament

Hodie est ante diem III Eidus Decembris; haec dies Septimontium
nefastus principio est: AGONALIA INDIGETI

A solemn day, being nefastus in the morning; that is, "those days
that are called religiosi which are of ill-fame and are hampered by
an evil omen, so that on them one must refrain from offering
sacrifice or beginning any new business whatever; they are, namely,
those days that the ignorant multitude falsely and improperly call
nefasti." ~ Gellius, Noctes Atticae 4.9.5

The indication of "NP" is thought to mean that the day was only
nefastus in the hours between midnight and sunrise. Afterward the
day would then become fastus. This division of the day allows rites
for the Manes before dawn, while no rites may be performed to the
celestial Gods anyway, and then allows the sacrifice for the ancient
rite on Agonium, and the sacrifice for the Septimontiale.

AGONIUM

Janus must be propitiated on the Agonal day.
The day may take its name from the girded priest
At whose blow the God's sacrifice is felled:
Always, before he stains the naked blade with hot blood,
He asks if he should, "agatne?" and won't unless commanded.
Some believe that the day is called Agonal because
The sheep do not come to the altar but are driven (agantur).
Others think the ancients called this festival Agnalia,
"Of the lambs", dropping a letter from its usual place.
Or because the victim fears the knife mirrored in the water,
The day might be so called from the creature's agony?
It may also be that the day has a Greek name
From the games (agones) that were held in former times.
And in ancient speech agonia meant a sheep,
And this last reason in my judgement is the truth.
Though the meaning is uncertain, Rex Sacrorum,
Must appease the Gods with the mate of a woolly ewe. ~ Ovidius Naso,
Fasti 1.318 ff.

While Ovid in his typical fashion offers us a few different
explanations, one that he does not mention is that the name Agonium
refers to a more ancient Latin term for sacrificial victim, rather
than hostis. It may even be related, as Ovid indicates, to the
sacrificial ram. This sacrifice of a ram to Janus occurred at the
Regia (Varro, L. L. 6.12). Agonius is instead mentioned as the deity
of the sacrifice, but only by Augustustine (Civ. Dei 4.11.16). His
name is related to the Quirinal, in as much as its traditional name
was Collis Agonus, the Colline Gate was called the porta agonensis,
and the Salii Agonenses were another sodalitas of Salii priests,
headquartered on the Quirinal Hill. It may be that two sacrifices
are indicated. The one for Janus in the Regia by the Rex Sacrorum,
while another sacerdos, possibly the flamen Quirinalis (?) performs a
sacrifice of a more ancient kind to the deity of the Colline city.


SEPTIMONTIA

This festival only appears in later calendars. "The dies
Septimontium is named for the Seven Hills on which site is the City;
the festival is not pro populi, but instead pro montarrum, just as
the Paganalia is for pagans of the rural districts (Varro, L. L.
6.24)." The montes here are the three divisons of the Palatine hill,
being Palatium, Cermalus and Velia, the three divisions of the
Esquiline Hill, being the Fagutal, Mons Oppius, and Mons Cispius,
together with the low-lying Subura between the hills. The flamen
Palatualis performed the sacrifice on the Palatium, but to which
deity is uncertain. Pales or Palatua has been suggested.

No carts or any other vehicles drawn by beasts of burden were allowed
into the City on this day (Plutarch, Quaes. Rom. 69). Such traffic
usually occurred at night, before dawn, in order to bring in the
supplies that fed the City markets. But this would have been
prohibited under the restriction of the nefastus principio and indeed
may explain the why the restriction is found in some fasti.


AUC 1114 / 361 CE Restoration of Religious Tolerance.

The Emperor Julian the Blessed restores Religious Tolerance, opening
the Temples to the Gods once more and renewing the culti Deorum. At
the same time he forbade harm to Christians

"I affirm by the Gods that I do not wish the Galilaeans to be either
put to death or unjustly beaten, or to suffer any other injury; but
nevertheless I do assert absolutely that the God-fearing must be
preferred to them. For through the folly of the Galilaeans almost
everything has been overturned, whereas through the grace of the Gods
are we all preserved. Wherefore we ought to honor the Gods and the
God-fearing, both men and cities." ~ Julian the Bless, Letter to
Atarbius

At Jerusalem he also set out to restore the Temple of Israel, writing
in a letter to the Jews, "I too shall build and populate, by my
efforts, after I successfully conclude my war against the Persians,
the holy city of Jerusalem, which for many years you have yearned to
see settled by yourselves, and together with you I shall give glory
to the very great God." (Ammianus Marcellinus, Res Gestae Bk. 31)


Today's thought:

"The first thing we ought to preach is reverence toward the Gods. For
it is fitting that we should perform our service to the Gods as
though They were Themselves present with us and beheld us, and though
not seen by us could direct Their gaze, which is more powerful than
any light, even as far as our hidden thoughts." ~ Julian the Blessed
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53440 From: Maior Date: 2007-12-11
Subject: Re: a.s. II diem Natalem Christi
Major Catoni sal;
Cato; Nabarz is here, an expert on Mithras who knows Persian and
has written scholarly works. Here is a scholarly paper by an
Iranologist at a conference in Tehran.
http://www.cais-soas.com/CAIS/Religions/iranian/Mithraism/mithra.htm

You haven't won any arguement, I'm not well-read in Mithras studies,
merely pointed out that December 25th is birthday of the saviour
Mithras. Go discuss the syncretic cults of Mithra, Mithras and
Christ with an
expert, Nabarz, unless you are afraid of losing.
Maior


> An interesting academic paper on Persian Mithra, Roman Mithras and
> Christ connection is on:
> http://www.cais-
soas.com/CAIS/Religions/iranian/Mithraism/mithra.htm
>
> Roman Mithras was a syncretic religion; a mixture of Greek, Roman
and
> Persian.

>
> An interesting academic paper on Persian Mithra, Roman Mithras and
> Christ connection is on:
> http://www.cais-
soas.com/CAIS/Religions/iranian/Mithraism/mithra.htm
>
> Roman Mithras was a syncretic religion; a mixture of Greek, Roman
and
> Persian.
>
> Here is a short excerpt from chapter 9 ‘Four Stations of Mithra’ in
> ‘The Mysteries of Mithras: The Pagan Belief That Shaped the
Christian
> World’ (Inner Traditions, 2005).
>
> YULE…quot;BIRTH OF THE SUN
> By Nabarz
>
> At Yule night the clouds are breaking
> Pour Old Wine into the cup
> Friends celebrate this night
> When does god give you a second life?
> - A traditional Persian Yule poem, translation by Nabarz
>
> Yule is the time of the rebirth of the sun, identified variously as
> Lugh, Mabon, Arthur, Mithras, Christ, Horus. In the Persian
calendar,
> Yule is called Yalda or Shab-e Yalda and is celebrated on December
21.
> It is the time of the winter solstice; it is the eve of the birth
of
> Mithra.
>
> According to Massumeh Price, 'The Persians adopted their annual
> renewal festival from the Babylonians and incorporated it into the
> rituals of their own Zoroastrian religion. The last day of the
Persian
> month Azar is the longest night of the year, when the forces of
> Ahriman are assumed to be at the peak of their strength. The next
day,
> the first day of the month “Day” known as “khoram rooz” or “khore
> rooz” (the day of sun) belongs to Ahura Mazda, the Lord of Wisdom.
> Since the days are getting longer and the nights shorter, this day
> marks the victory of Sun over the darkness. The occasion was
> celebrated in the festival of “Daygan” dedicated to Ahura Mazda, on
> the first day of the month “Day.” Fires would be burnt all night to
> ensure the defeat of the forces of Ahriman. There would be feasts,
> acts of charity and a number of deities were honoured, and prayers
> performed to ensure the total victory of sun that was essential for
> the protection of winter crops. There would be prayers to Mithra
> (Mehr) and feasts in his honour, since Mithra is the Eyzad
responsible
> for protecting “the light of the early morning,” known
as “Havangah.”
> It was also assumed that Ahura Mazda would grant people’s wishes;
> especially those with no offspring had the hope to be blessed with
> children if they performed all rites on this occasion. One of the
> themes of the festival was the temporary subversion of order.
Masters
> and servants reversed roles. The king dressed in white would change
> place with ordinary people. A mock king was crowned and masquerades
> spilled into the streets. As the old year died, rules of ordinary
> living were relaxed. This tradition persisted till the Sassanian
> period, and is mentioned by Biruni and others in their recordings
of
> pre-Islamic rituals and festivals. Its origin goes back to the
> Babylonian New Year celebration. These people believed the first
> creation was order that came out of chaos. To appreciate and
celebrate
> the first creation, they had a festival and all roles were
reversed.
> Disorder and chaos ruled for a day and eventually order was
restored
> and succeeded at the end of the festival.1
>
> Furthermore, according to the Web site iranheritage.com:
> It was said that Mithra was born out of the light that came from
> within the Alborz Mountains. Ancient Iranians would gather in caves
> along the mountain range throughout the night to witness this
miracle
> together at dawn. They were known as “Yar-e Ghar” (Cave Mates). In
> Iran today, despite the advent of Islam and Muslim rituals, Shab-e
> Yalda is still celebrated widely. It is a time when friends and
family
> gather together to eat, drink and read poetry (especially Hafiz)
until
> well after midnight. Fruits and nuts are eaten, and pomegranates
and
> watermelons are particularly significant. The red colour in these
> fruits symbolizes the crimson hues of dawn and the glow of life,
> invoking the splendour of Mithra. Because Shab-e Yalda is the
longest
> and darkest night, it has come to symbolize many things in Persian
> poetry: separation from a loved one, loneliness and waiting. After
> Shab-e Yalda a transformation takes place…quot;the waiting is
over, light
> shines and goodness prevails. As poet Saadi says:
>
> The sight of you each morning is a New Year
> Any night of your departure is the eve of Yule (Sa’adi)
> With all my pains, there is still the hope of recovery
> Like the eve of Yule, there will finally be an end (Sa’adi).2
>
> Some years ago I tried to capture the spirit of Yule and its
essence
> as a international global festival by writing this Yule poem:
>
> Yule
> The sun is setting low on the western horizon.
> Sky serpent swallowing him once more
> Yule night has arrived; sun’s longest slumbers.
>
> We eat and drink all that is red
> Wine, pomegranate, and watermelon,
> The color of dawn, reminders of what we eagerly wait for.
>
> Shamash, Marduk, Sekhmet,
> Descending immortals, you’ll rise again
> Apollo, Ra, salutations to you.
>
> Good night Osiris, weak and tired lying in your coffin,
> Enclosed by darkness, tricked by Seth again!
> An infant sun is born, Horus soaring up into the sky.
>
> Mithras, born of a rock and out from the cave,
> Becoming Sol Invictus and turning the wheel
> Darkness, now a fading memory.
>
> The Oak king sings outside, as the Holly king lays slain
> Dawn has arrived, Yule has ended.
> Drink up your wine.
>
> The above article is a short excerpt from chapter 9 ‘Four Stations
of
> Mithra’ in ‘The Mysteries of Mithras: The Pagan Belief That Shaped
the
> Christian World’ (Inner Traditions, 2005).
>
> References:
> 1. www.persianoutpost.com/htdocs/yalda.html
> 2. www.iranheritage.com/programmes/yalda_back.htm
>
> Regards,
> Nabarz
>
> http://www.myspace.com/nabarz
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Maior" <rory12001@> wrote:
> >
> > Salve Nabarz;
> >
> > No, you are not too late at all. Most of us here are not in
England,
> > as we would love to watch your programme. I would buy it.
> >
> > I am in the U.S., Gaia Iulia in Argentina, Tutor in the Czech
> > republic, Minervalis France, Aquila Germany.
> >
> > So would you explain is Persian Mithras (Mehr) the same as Roman
> > Mithras? And is December 25th the birth of the hero Mithras from
the
> > All Virgin Anahita?
> >
> > Many people here, hear that this holiday is something unique to
> > Christianity and need to know the historical syncretic roots of
> > Christmas.
> >
> > Any scholarly references would be appreciated! We could write an
> > article for our NRwiki, in fact a Mithras section would be ideal.
> > bene vale
> > Marca Hortensia Maior
> > >
> > > 'Will the Real Jesus Please Stand Up'
> > > 'How would you feel if you discovered that the traditional
story of
> > > Jesus that begins at Christmas with the nativity wasn't quite
as
> > > unique as you might have thought?
> > >
> > >
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53441 From: Gaius Petronius Dexter Date: 2007-12-11
Subject: Re: a. d. III Eidus Decembris
G. Petronius Dexter M. Moravio Piscino Horatiano SPD.

> Janus must be propitiated on the Agonal day.
> The day may take its name from the girded priest
> At whose blow the God's sacrifice is felled:
> Always, before he stains the naked blade with hot blood,
> He asks if he should, "agatne?" and won't unless commanded.

You have reference of that in Suetonius about the murder of Caius
Caesar : 58 " alii tradunt alloquenti pueros a tergo Chaeream
cervicem gladio caesim graviter percusisse praemissa voce : "Hoc age!"

In my bad English :
Others relate when [Caligula] was speaking with children Chaereas
from behind struck his neck with a sword pronouncing : "hoc age!"

This murder is shown here like a sacrifice.

G.Petronius Dexter.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53442 From: M. Lucretius Agricola Date: 2007-12-11
Subject: Re: Real temples - Petronius Dexter and Horatius
Agricola Agrippae sal.


I like to watch the Lucretii on the Album Civium, and then use the
built-in mail feature to welcome new relatives to Nova Roma. I like
the mail feature because there is a bit of privacy and citizens can
opt out of it if they want to. If you have not tried it yet I really
recommend it.

Optime vale!


--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Gens Iulia" <maite_cat@...> wrote:
>
> Salve M. Lucretius Agricola!:
> I really appreciate your "navigation". I don't quite mind about
biographies, just knowing where each citizen might be currently
living, in order to figure out whether personal contact is possible or
not. Or even figure out their background. It is very useful to place
each post in context. All of us have different life experiences, and
our native (or residence) countries also add to it. So, as an example,
a writing style which can be thought as "harsh" for some citizens,
could only be a standard way of expression for others. A bit like
Desmond Morris' "Manwatching".
> Vale bene.
> Gaia Iulia Agrippa.
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "M. Lucretius Agricola" <wm_hogue@...>
> To: <Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com>
> Sent: Sunday, December 09, 2007 9:12 PM
> Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Real temples - Petronius Dexter and Horatius
>
>
> > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Gens Iulia" <maite_cat@> wrote:
> > >
> > > Salve Marca Hortensia:
> > > I've been following your posts during the past weeks. Thanks a lot
> > for your answer.
> > > I cannot say that our small, private, improvised rituals can be
> > accounted as "practices in Buenos Aires", as I feel we are a minority.
> > So far, I haven't been contacted by any Nova Roma local citizens since
> > we became citizens too. I'm having a bit of problems too navigating
> > the new Wiki website. As an example, while I found easily the "Gens
> > Iulia" list when I applied, now I see there is no page for it at Wiki.
> >
> >
> > Salve!
> >
> > Look here:
http://www.novaroma.org/nr/Category:Gens_Iulia_%28Nova_Roma%29
> >
> > We try to be clear about the difference between ancient Roma and Nova
> > Roma, so we are using the (Nova Roma) ending to mark articles
about *us*.
> >
> > For a list of ALL members of a gens, you will have to go to the Album
> > Civium. Go to your page and look carefully and you will see a link
> > that will show you all gens members. We only make biography pages when
> > people have held office, are priests etc. The Album Civium shows *all*
> > citizens.
> >
> > Optime vale!
> >
> > Agricola
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > No virus found in this incoming message.
> > Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> > Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.16.17/1179 - Release Date:
09/12/07 11:06 a.m.
> >
> >
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53443 From: David Kling (Modianus) Date: 2007-12-11
Subject: Re: a.s. II diem Natalem Christi
Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus Lucio Iulio Regulo salutem dicit

I don't agree with your argument, and I will tell you why.

Christian theology, for the most part, is very complex and varied
depending upon the denomination of Christianity you are dealing with.
Christianity does have similarities with Zorastrianism yet it is not
that. It also has similarities with Judaism, but it is not that
either. Likewise, it has similarities with many religious traditions
of antiquity. Religious traditions borrow from one another all the
time, when cultures meet their religious traditions are often slightly
blended.

Many religious traditions are highly syncretistic: Sikhs, Buddhism
(look at Tibetan Buddhism for example), Druze, et al. Additionally,
it is secret that Roman Catholicism adapted many aspects of Rome from
antiquity into its eccelesiology. It is in this area that I like
Hegel's dialectic: thesis, antithesis, and dialectic.

Earlier in this forum we discussed the origins of Rome and the myth
surrounding it. Those myths have meaning, and while it might not be
necessary to take them literal we still do not need to dismiss them as
absolute rubbish either. Likewise, the same applies with regard to
Christian doctrines also. Even if parts of Christianity were co-opted
from other religious traditions it doesn't invalidate that system no
more than Roman religion can be invalidated by scholarship that might
show early influences outside Rome.

If a scholar found an ancient text that spells out how some ancient
Etruscan or Roman or Greek just started making up religious truths
would we suddenly cease our devotion to the Gods? Likewise, were the
ancient poets divine prophets or just men trying to make a living
(their times version of Shakespeare)? Is their word dogma or just
interesting reading?

All of this... boils down to the paradox of faith that Kierkegaard
wrote about. Faith is not a result of reason, but of a paradoxical
choice according to Kierkegaard and I think this is an important
distinction. If someone has taken the paradoxical leap of faith then
no history lesson is going to shake their faith, and it shouldn't
because it is not by reason that the leap was taken.

Vale:

Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus

On Dec 10, 2007 9:12 PM, Michael Echevarria <luciusjul25@...> wrote:
>
> Salve,
>
> Christianity does have similarities with Zoroastriniasm and many devout
> Christians say that is false. They like to believe their religion is unique
> but in fact it isnt. They should look up the history of their faith before
> they cross themselves. Some do not realize that they could be giving praise
> to some other Creator, some other Virgin Mother, and placing their fear into
> some other religions Devil. The problem is also within the private Christian
> schools because they do not teach the students the real history of
> Christianity and so the cycle continues. It might just be because they might
> lose their tight grip on the masses. I believe this is a great discussion
> considering the time of the season.
>
> Lucius Iulius Regulus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53444 From: Gaius Petronius Dexter Date: 2007-12-11
Subject: Re: AGONALIA TOMORROW - DEC 11. (NP)
G. Dexter Aureliano SPD,

Ave senator et flamen Cerealis !

> Agonalia (dies NP)

> The Romans celebrated the Agonalia three times each year,

I am not sure about it... in my opinion they celebrate the Agonalia
four times each year.

> on January
> 9, May 21, and December 11.

You forgot on marsh 17 the Agonium Martiale the same day than the
Liberalia. See Macrobius (I,IV,15):

"15 Masurius etiam secundo Fastorum: Liberalium dies, inquit, a
pontificibus agonium Martiale appellatur, et in eodem libro: Eam
noctem deincepsque insequentem diem, qui est Lucarium, non dixit
Lucariorum: itemque Liberalium multi dixerunt, non Liberaliorum."

Cura ut valeas.

G.Petronius.Dexter
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53445 From: c_cornelius_rufus Date: 2007-12-11
Subject: Re: A Good Lex is a good Lex
Salve Consul et salvete omnes

Perhaps all of this argument over the Cursus Honorum is a good example
of the "Peter Principle"?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peter_principle

In the current climate why would any ordinary civis want to subject
themselves to such bickering and ineffectiveness? I believe it SHOULD
be harder to obtain higher office and if that means we have difficulty
filling positions then maybe we need fewer of them.

Valete
C. Cornelius Rufus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53446 From: Michael Echevarria Date: 2007-12-11
Subject: Re: a.s. II diem Natalem Christi
Salve,

I wish to express right now that it was not my intention to invalidate anyone's religion. My intention was to get the point across that many Christians do not know the history of their own faith or choose to accept that their religion is not unique. If you would have asked me if that was my intention before accusing me of doing so, then I would not be as offended as I am right now. There was no need for a religious history lesson, I know these things and they should not be directed toward me but to those who do not know, understand, or accept that their religion is not unique. If anyone was offended then they misunderstood my post.

Lucius Iulius Regulus

"David Kling (Modianus)" <tau.athanasios@...> wrote:
Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus Lucio Iulio Regulo salutem dicit

I don't agree with your argument, and I will tell you why.

Christian theology, for the most part, is very complex and varied
depending upon the denomination of Christianity you are dealing with.
Christianity does have similarities with Zorastrianism yet it is not
that. It also has similarities with Judaism, but it is not that
either. Likewise, it has similarities with many religious traditions
of antiquity. Religious traditions borrow from one another all the
time, when cultures meet their religious traditions are often slightly
blended.

Many religious traditions are highly syncretistic: Sikhs, Buddhism
(look at Tibetan Buddhism for example), Druze, et al. Additionally,
it is secret that Roman Catholicism adapted many aspects of Rome from
antiquity into its eccelesiology. It is in this area that I like
Hegel's dialectic: thesis, antithesis, and dialectic.

Earlier in this forum we discussed the origins of Rome and the myth
surrounding it. Those myths have meaning, and while it might not be
necessary to take them literal we still do not need to dismiss them as
absolute rubbish either. Likewise, the same applies with regard to
Christian doctrines also. Even if parts of Christianity were co-opted
from other religious traditions it doesn't invalidate that system no
more than Roman religion can be invalidated by scholarship that might
show early influences outside Rome.

If a scholar found an ancient text that spells out how some ancient
Etruscan or Roman or Greek just started making up religious truths
would we suddenly cease our devotion to the Gods? Likewise, were the
ancient poets divine prophets or just men trying to make a living
(their times version of Shakespeare)? Is their word dogma or just
interesting reading?

All of this... boils down to the paradox of faith that Kierkegaard
wrote about. Faith is not a result of reason, but of a paradoxical
choice according to Kierkegaard and I think this is an important
distinction. If someone has taken the paradoxical leap of faith then
no history lesson is going to shake their faith, and it shouldn't
because it is not by reason that the leap was taken.

Vale:

Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus

On Dec 10, 2007 9:12 PM, Michael Echevarria <luciusjul25@...> wrote:
>
> Salve,
>
> Christianity does have similarities with Zoroastriniasm and many devout
> Christians say that is false. They like to believe their religion is unique
> but in fact it isnt. They should look up the history of their faith before
> they cross themselves. Some do not realize that they could be giving praise
> to some other Creator, some other Virgin Mother, and placing their fear into
> some other religions Devil. The problem is also within the private Christian
> schools because they do not teach the students the real history of
> Christianity and so the cycle continues. It might just be because they might
> lose their tight grip on the masses. I believe this is a great discussion
> considering the time of the season.
>
> Lucius Iulius Regulus





---------------------------------
Looking for last minute shopping deals? Find them fast with Yahoo! Search.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53447 From: David Kling (Modianus) Date: 2007-12-11
Subject: Re: a.s. II diem Natalem Christi
Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus Lucio Iulio Regulo salutem dicit

"If anyone was offended then they misunderstood my post."

You seem to equate offense with disagreement. The two are not
interchangeable. I disagreed with your arguments, but I was not
necessarily offended by your statements. I believe them to be false,
but not necessarily offensive.

"There was no need for a religious history lesson, I know these things
and they should not be directed toward me but to those who do not
know, understand, or accept that their religion is not unique."

I think you are being far too sensitive. First of all what exactly is
"unique," in the religious sense of the word? The Romans had an
complex system of religious law and practices, but were they the first
ancient culture to offer sacrifice to various Gods? The Romans, and
their religious practices, were not completely unique either when
compared to the practices of those cultures that evolved in
Mesopotamia and Greece. Does that make the Roman system any less
efficacious? Certainly not, just as the Christian tradition -- even
if its myths are not as unique as they may claim -- is also a valid
religious tradition.

The main point of your argument seems to be that Christianity is not
unique, and that most Christians are unaware that their religion is
not unique. My response is that while many religious traditions are a
result of some form of syncretism they do represent a phenomenon in
their own right, and are therefore unique to a point. This is
certainly true of Roman religion within antiquity and currently in
Nova Roma. There are similarities within all of the ancient religious
traditions (offerings, sacrifice, nature of priesthoods, etc...), yet
there were also differences and the phenomenon in which they thrived
was distinct -- therefore the Romans saw similarities within other
cultures but also cherished their own "uniqueness."

"If you would have asked me if that was my intention before accusing
me of doing so, then I would not be as offended as I am right now."

Are we engaging in intelligent discourse or something else? I made no
accusation, I simply disagreed with your arguments and offered my own
viewpoint -- such is the nature of debate, dialogue, conversation,
etc... If you cannot take having your words under the light of
scrutiny then why issue statements like you did? I am baffled that
you would be offended by my words, since they were offered in a spirit
of debate and not as a personal attack on you. I welcome debate and
discussion. Are you simply looking for "I agree," or are you
interested in discussing the matter? Because if you are only
interested in "me too" then there is not much of a point in engaging
you in conversation.

Vale:

Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus

On Dec 11, 2007 11:45 AM, Michael Echevarria <luciusjul25@...> wrote:
>
> Salve,
>
> I wish to express right now that it was not my intention to invalidate
> anyone's religion. My intention was to get the point across that many
> Christians do not know the history of their own faith or choose to accept
> that their religion is not unique. If you would have asked me if that was my
> intention before accusing me of doing so, then I would not be as offended as
> I am right now. There was no need for a religious history lesson, I know
> these things and they should not be directed toward me but to those who do
> not know, understand, or accept that their religion is not unique. If anyone
> was offended then they misunderstood my post.
>
> Lucius Iulius Regulus
>
>
>
> "David Kling (Modianus)" <tau.athanasios@...> wrote:
> Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus Lucio Iulio Regulo salutem dicit
>
> I don't agree with your argument, and I will tell you why.
>
> Christian theology, for the most part, is very complex and varied
> depending upon the denomination of Christianity you are dealing with.
> Christianity does have similarities with Zorastrianism yet it is not
> that. It also has similarities with Judaism, but it is not that
> either. Likewise, it has similarities with many religious traditions
> of antiquity. Religious traditions borrow from one another all the
> time, when cultures meet their religious traditions are often slightly
> blended.
>
> Many religious traditions are highly syncretistic: Sikhs, Buddhism
> (look at Tibetan Buddhism for example), Druze, et al. Additionally,
> it is secret that Roman Catholicism adapted many aspects of Rome from
> antiquity into its eccelesiology. It is in this area that I like
> Hegel's dialectic: thesis, antithesis, and dialectic.
>
> Earlier in this forum we discussed the origins of Rome and the myth
> surrounding it. Those myths have meaning, and while it might not be
> necessary to take them literal we still do not need to dismiss them as
> absolute rubbish either. Likewise, the same applies with regard to
> Christian doctrines also. Even if parts of Christianity were co-opted
> from other religious traditions it doesn't invalidate that system no
> more than Roman religion can be invalidated by scholarship that might
> show early influences outside Rome.
>
> If a scholar found an ancient text that spells out how some ancient
> Etruscan or Roman or Greek just started making up religious truths
> would we suddenly cease our devotion to the Gods? Likewise, were the
> ancient poets divine prophets or just men trying to make a living
> (their times version of Shakespeare)? Is their word dogma or just
> interesting reading?
>
> All of this... boils down to the paradox of faith that Kierkegaard
> wrote about. Faith is not a result of reason, but of a paradoxical
> choice according to Kierkegaard and I think this is an important
> distinction. If someone has taken the paradoxical leap of faith then
> no history lesson is going to shake their faith, and it shouldn't
> because it is not by reason that the leap was taken.
>
> Vale:
>
> Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus
>
> On Dec 10, 2007 9:12 PM, Michael Echevarria <luciusjul25@...> wrote:
> >
> > Salve,
> >
> > Christianity does have similarities with Zoroastriniasm and many devout
> > Christians say that is false. They like to believe their religion is
> unique
> > but in fact it isnt. They should look up the history of their faith
> before
> > they cross themselves. Some do not realize that they could be giving
> praise
> > to some other Creator, some other Virgin Mother, and placing their fear
> into
> > some other religions Devil. The problem is also within the private
> Christian
> > schools because they do not teach the students the real history of
> > Christianity and so the cycle continues. It might just be because they
> might
> > lose their tight grip on the masses. I believe this is a great discussion
> > considering the time of the season.
> >
> > Lucius Iulius Regulus
>
> ---------------------------------
> Looking for last minute shopping deals? Find them fast with Yahoo! Search.
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53448 From: Michael Echevarria Date: 2007-12-11
Subject: Re: a.s. II diem Natalem Christi
Salve,

I understand that offense and disagreement are two different things, I am not stating the opposite. When I say anyone I am not referring to you alone, I am talking about all the citizens in NR, especially the Christians. I am not making this about you alone neither did I say such. Trust me this is not about you. I am not pointing any specific person out neither would I like to. If you find my comments false then so be it but the accusation was made that I was trying to invalidate Christianity. I would never do such a thing because it is inappropriate. I have respect for all religions.

When I say unique I mean that the practices that are done today, by any religion, is not anything that was thought up when a religion was first founded. To say that any religion is truly unique, then I would have to say I disagree. All should understand and be taught that all religions have practices and teachings that stem from the influence of others. Whether it be in schools or on their own accord, but they should have a passion to learn about their religious traditions. That is the problem in this age. Sometimes it can not and will not be taught in private schools and when the students leave they are left with the ignorance of not knowing their religious history which I think does even more damage to ones faith. All aspects of a religion should be layed out when being taught to potential followers. It may seem I am being too sensitive, well guess what, religion is a sensitive subject. The reason why I may seem so is because I do not want any citizen here to think I am
invalidating their religion or faith. That is far from my main point.

I have no problem with anyone commenting on a subject that I post about, that would be insane. Therefor, as you stated correctly, I should not be here or engage in conversation with others. I have no problem with debate or conversation but when my words are taken out of context is when it bothers me, as it would anyone. The more who comment on a particilar post the better because we all get a chance to express our ideas about that subject, I accept it with open arms and wouldn't have it any other way. This is not an attack against you, nor should anyone take it as such, but as an elaboration. You are a well respected citizen by many here and the respect is well deserved.

Lucius Iulius Regulus

"David Kling (Modianus)" <tau.athanasios@...> wrote:
Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus Lucio Iulio Regulo salutem dicit

"If anyone was offended then they misunderstood my post."

You seem to equate offense with disagreement. The two are not
interchangeable. I disagreed with your arguments, but I was not
necessarily offended by your statements. I believe them to be false,
but not necessarily offensive.

"There was no need for a religious history lesson, I know these things
and they should not be directed toward me but to those who do not
know, understand, or accept that their religion is not unique."

I think you are being far too sensitive. First of all what exactly is
"unique," in the religious sense of the word? The Romans had an
complex system of religious law and practices, but were they the first
ancient culture to offer sacrifice to various Gods? The Romans, and
their religious practices, were not completely unique either when
compared to the practices of those cultures that evolved in
Mesopotamia and Greece. Does that make the Roman system any less
efficacious? Certainly not, just as the Christian tradition -- even
if its myths are not as unique as they may claim -- is also a valid
religious tradition.

The main point of your argument seems to be that Christianity is not
unique, and that most Christians are unaware that their religion is
not unique. My response is that while many religious traditions are a
result of some form of syncretism they do represent a phenomenon in
their own right, and are therefore unique to a point. This is
certainly true of Roman religion within antiquity and currently in
Nova Roma. There are similarities within all of the ancient religious
traditions (offerings, sacrifice, nature of priesthoods, etc...), yet
there were also differences and the phenomenon in which they thrived
was distinct -- therefore the Romans saw similarities within other
cultures but also cherished their own "uniqueness."

"If you would have asked me if that was my intention before accusing
me of doing so, then I would not be as offended as I am right now."

Are we engaging in intelligent discourse or something else? I made no
accusation, I simply disagreed with your arguments and offered my own
viewpoint -- such is the nature of debate, dialogue, conversation,
etc... If you cannot take having your words under the light of
scrutiny then why issue statements like you did? I am baffled that
you would be offended by my words, since they were offered in a spirit
of debate and not as a personal attack on you. I welcome debate and
discussion. Are you simply looking for "I agree," or are you
interested in discussing the matter? Because if you are only
interested in "me too" then there is not much of a point in engaging
you in conversation.

Vale:

Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus

On Dec 11, 2007 11:45 AM, Michael Echevarria <luciusjul25@...> wrote:
>
> Salve,
>
> I wish to express right now that it was not my intention to invalidate
> anyone's religion. My intention was to get the point across that many
> Christians do not know the history of their own faith or choose to accept
> that their religion is not unique. If you would have asked me if that was my
> intention before accusing me of doing so, then I would not be as offended as
> I am right now. There was no need for a religious history lesson, I know
> these things and they should not be directed toward me but to those who do
> not know, understand, or accept that their religion is not unique. If anyone
> was offended then they misunderstood my post.
>
> Lucius Iulius Regulus
>
>
>
> "David Kling (Modianus)" <tau.athanasios@...> wrote:
> Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus Lucio Iulio Regulo salutem dicit
>
> I don't agree with your argument, and I will tell you why.
>
> Christian theology, for the most part, is very complex and varied
> depending upon the denomination of Christianity you are dealing with.
> Christianity does have similarities with Zorastrianism yet it is not
> that. It also has similarities with Judaism, but it is not that
> either. Likewise, it has similarities with many religious traditions
> of antiquity. Religious traditions borrow from one another all the
> time, when cultures meet their religious traditions are often slightly
> blended.
>
> Many religious traditions are highly syncretistic: Sikhs, Buddhism
> (look at Tibetan Buddhism for example), Druze, et al. Additionally,
> it is secret that Roman Catholicism adapted many aspects of Rome from
> antiquity into its eccelesiology. It is in this area that I like
> Hegel's dialectic: thesis, antithesis, and dialectic.
>
> Earlier in this forum we discussed the origins of Rome and the myth
> surrounding it. Those myths have meaning, and while it might not be
> necessary to take them literal we still do not need to dismiss them as
> absolute rubbish either. Likewise, the same applies with regard to
> Christian doctrines also. Even if parts of Christianity were co-opted
> from other religious traditions it doesn't invalidate that system no
> more than Roman religion can be invalidated by scholarship that might
> show early influences outside Rome.
>
> If a scholar found an ancient text that spells out how some ancient
> Etruscan or Roman or Greek just started making up religious truths
> would we suddenly cease our devotion to the Gods? Likewise, were the
> ancient poets divine prophets or just men trying to make a living
> (their times version of Shakespeare)? Is their word dogma or just
> interesting reading?
>
> All of this... boils down to the paradox of faith that Kierkegaard
> wrote about. Faith is not a result of reason, but of a paradoxical
> choice according to Kierkegaard and I think this is an important
> distinction. If someone has taken the paradoxical leap of faith then
> no history lesson is going to shake their faith, and it shouldn't
> because it is not by reason that the leap was taken.
>
> Vale:
>
> Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus
>
> On Dec 10, 2007 9:12 PM, Michael Echevarria <luciusjul25@...> wrote:
> >
> > Salve,
> >
> > Christianity does have similarities with Zoroastriniasm and many devout
> > Christians say that is false. They like to believe their religion is
> unique
> > but in fact it isnt. They should look up the history of their faith
> before
> > they cross themselves. Some do not realize that they could be giving
> praise
> > to some other Creator, some other Virgin Mother, and placing their fear
> into
> > some other religions Devil. The problem is also within the private
> Christian
> > schools because they do not teach the students the real history of
> > Christianity and so the cycle continues. It might just be because they
> might
> > lose their tight grip on the masses. I believe this is a great discussion
> > considering the time of the season.
> >
> > Lucius Iulius Regulus
>
> ---------------------------------
> Looking for last minute shopping deals? Find them fast with Yahoo! Search.
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>





---------------------------------
Looking for last minute shopping deals? Find them fast with Yahoo! Search.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53449 From: M Arminius Maior Date: 2007-12-11
Subject: Results, First Class (was Re: [Nova-Roma] Results of Comitia Centuri
Salve


--- "A. Tullia Scholastica" <fororom@...>
escreveu:
> > A. Tullia Scholastica Ti. Galerio Paulino M.
> Arminio Maiori quiritibus bonae
> > voluntatis S.P.D.

> > Results of Comitia Centuriata
> > ATS: A couple of
> > little points: [..] And could we
> > please obey the Lex Fabia, however belatedly, and
> give the tally of the
> > first-class centuries voting during the period set
> aside for them? We are
> > required to obey the law. Dura fortasse, et
> difficilis fortasse, sed lex.


Sorry for the quite belated report.


Report for the first class of comitia centuriata:

Of the 14 centurias of the First Class, nine voted in
the announced timespan. The majority is then five
centurias.


- Censor:
M. Hortensia Maior, 4 centuries
Ti. Galerius Paulinus, 5 centuries

The centuries of the first class favours Ti. Galerius
for Censor.


- Consul:
M. Moravius Piscinus Horatianus, 3 centuries
T. Iulius Sabinus, 6 centuries

The centuries of the first class favours T. Iulius for
Consul.


- Praetor
M. Curiatus Complutensis, 3 centuries
M. Iulius Severus, 6 centuries

The centuries of the first class favours M. Iulius for
Praetor.


Valete
M.Arminius Maior
Diribitor


Abra sua conta no Yahoo! Mail, o único sem limite de espaço para armazenamento!
http://br.mail.yahoo.com/
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53451 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2007-12-11
Subject: Re: a.s. II diem Natalem Christi
Cato C. Fabio Buteoni Modiano L. Iulio Regulo SPD

Salvete.

Iulius Regulus, it's the comments like the one about Christianity
"losing its grip on the masses" that signify a shift from intellectual
discourse to a less edifying level.

The idea that Christians are, in general, ignorant of their own
history is simply too ridiculous to be countenanced. We have been
taught for centuries now how terrible we are, how we have destroyed
civilization and undermined the nobility of the human spirit &c. You
would have to have grown up under a rock to be ignorant of the
innumerable, despicable faults of the past for which Christianity is
held solely responsible. What is especially laughable is the ordinary
assumption that the whole of Christian history is dependent upon the
history and actions of the Roman Catholic Church.

That some themes in the Christian faith should find resonance in other
belief systems is simply common sense: birth, death, resurrection,
guilt, sin, redemption, sacrifice, love - these are simply
transcendant human experiences and have been since humans began to
ponder their own existence and their place in the scheme of the
universe. As Fabius Modianus touched on, it is not the themes that
are unique, but rather the answers to the questions they raise that
separate one faith from another.

Christianity adopted many local seasonal celebrations as a means to
furthering the spread of the faith, which again is simply an
historical pattern common among all religions. That this syncretism
should be acceptable for others yet wrong for Christianity is an
ill-educated and poorly-considered idea.

It just so happens that in this particular instance, it seems that at
least one Christian writer (Iulius Africanus) had already calculated a
date for the celebration of the birth of Christ as 25 December - for
whatever reason - before any other "solar deity" had made his imprint.

Vale,

Cato
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53452 From: Michael Echevarria Date: 2007-12-11
Subject: Re: a.s. II diem Natalem Christi
Salve,

I stated the comment about Christianity "losing its grip on the masses" because that seems the reason as to why the history of the religion isnt being taught to potential followers. If religion is to be taught it should be taught in its full context, its complete history and not just one side of the story. Do you not know how many people I have met, and Im sure others can give a story or two, that do not know the history behind Christianity and had to explain it to them. So to say that they are ignorant to their religion is not a false statement. When I say ignorant its not to be taken in a bad way but in a sad way because in most cases it is not their fault. I never said that all Christians are ignorant to the history of their faith. Not every Christian understands or knows what their religion has branched from which is why there is a problem in the education of Christianity, and other religions as well. You make it seem like I am trying to make a scapegoat out of the
Christian faith and that is not what I am doing here.

The point is that there should be better religious education because the belief of virgin birth, angels, demons, hell, heaven, afterlife, one creator and supreme god, or many gods is not related to one religion alone. That is what makes some ignorant to their own faith. The reason why some believe that the faults of Christianity should stem from the Roman Catholic Church is from poor education so to say it is laughable is incorrect. People make decisions based on the information that was taught to them so to laugh in their face instead of helping them to understand the situation is in itself poor actions. No one ever stated that syncretism was wrong for Christianity and acceptable to other religions it is the idea of syncretism that is not known or understood by many Christians.

Whether Iulius Africanus decided the date for the birth of Christ or the Solar Deity was there first, is anyones guess. The fact is that we really dont know what actual day the Immaculate Conception took place or even the birth of Christ but no one would argue that it didnt take place because that would be disrespectful. So to say that the date of the "solar deity," as you put it, was figured out after the birth of Christ in essence is saying, " Ha ha, mine came first than yours." We really do not know, or will ever know, the actual dates that pertain to religious history because in the end it all relies on faith and what we do with that faith is what makes us who we are. Will we spend our time here on this Earth with the time alloted to us supporting other religions and educating others or will we one by one destroy them and see which one comes out on top?? It really doesnt matter who's God or Gods are better.....

Lucius Iulius Regulus





Gaius Equitius Cato <mlcinnyc@...> wrote:
Cato C. Fabio Buteoni Modiano L. Iulio Regulo SPD

Salvete.

Iulius Regulus, it's the comments like the one about Christianity
"losing its grip on the masses" that signify a shift from intellectual
discourse to a less edifying level.

The idea that Christians are, in general, ignorant of their own
history is simply too ridiculous to be countenanced. We have been
taught for decades now how terrible we are, how we have destroyed
civilization and undermined the nobility of the human spirit &c. You
would have to have grown up under a rock to be ignorant of the
innumerable, despicable faults of the past for which Christianity is
held solely responsible. What is especially laughable is the ordinary
assumption that the whole of Christian history is dependent upon the
history and actions of the Roman Catholic Church.

That some themes in the Christian faith should find resonance in other
belief systems is simply common sense: birth, death, resurrection,
guilt, sin, redemption, sacrifice, love - these are simply
transcendant human experiences and have been since humans began to
ponder their own existence and their place in the scheme of the
universe. As Fabius Modianus touched on, it is not the themes that
are unique, but rather the answers to the questions they raise that
separate one faith from another.

Christianity adopted many local seasonal celebrations as a means to
furthering the spread of the faith, which again is simply an
historical pattern common among all religions. That this syncretism
should be acceptable for others yet wrong for Christianity is an
ill-educated and poorly-considered idea.

It just so happens that in this particular instance, it seems that at
least one Christian writer (Iulius Africanus) had already calculated a
date for the celebration of the birth of Christ as 25 December - for
whatever reason - before any other "solar deity" had made his imprint.

Vale,

Cato






---------------------------------
Looking for last minute shopping deals? Find them fast with Yahoo! Search.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53453 From: Nabarz Date: 2007-12-11
Subject: Re: a.s. II diem Natalem Christi
>
> It just so happens that in this particular instance, it seems that at
> least one Christian writer (Iulius Africanus) had already calculated a
> date for the celebration of the birth of Christ as 25 December - for
> whatever reason - before any other "solar deity" had made his imprint.
>
Salve Cato,

Putting the Armenian Church aside who celebrates Christmas on 6th
ofJanuary still.

Just to be clear, according Iulius Africanus Christ was conceived (25
March) i.e. shortly after Spring Equinox (21st March) and was born
(25Dec) shortly after Winter Solstice (21 December).

Perfect, now that is called an accurate Solar god ;-)

Christ as a light of world, is conceived at the balance of light/dark,
and born at time of darkness, bringing light to world. Sounds good to me.

The winter solstice and return of light has been marked and celebrated
for a very long time before Christ, for physical evidence e.g look at
sites like Stonehenge.

Anyway have a great Christmas, Winter Solstice, Yule, Shabe Yalda,
Alban Arthuran etc...

I guess the point is many people from different cultures and religions
celebrate return and birth of light, the label we give it is secondary
imho.

Regards,
Nabarz
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53454 From: Titus Flavius Aquila Date: 2007-12-11
Subject: AW: [Nova-Roma] Re: a.s. II diem Natalem Christi
Titus Flavius Aquila Luci Iuli Regulo salutem plurimam dicit

Salve Regulus,

I understand your point of view and education is the main point here. Let´s learn from one another, this
could be very fruitful and beneficial. There might not be a single truth.

After all , we have one common goal , to build our republic Nova Roma and to honour our gods.

Vale optime in pace deorum
Titus Flavius Aquila
Tribunus Plebis
Scriba Censoris KFBM
Nova Roma



----- Ursprüngliche Mail ----
Von: Michael Echevarria <luciusjul25@...>
An: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Gesendet: Dienstag, den 11. Dezember 2007, 22:16:15 Uhr
Betreff: Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: a.s. II diem Natalem Christi

Salve,

I stated the comment about Christianity "losing its grip on the masses" because that seems the reason as to why the history of the religion isnt being taught to potential followers. If religion is to be taught it should be taught in its full context, its complete history and not just one side of the story. Do you not know how many people I have met, and Im sure others can give a story or two, that do not know the history behind Christianity and had to explain it to them. So to say that they are ignorant to their religion is not a false statement. When I say ignorant its not to be taken in a bad way but in a sad way because in most cases it is not their fault. I never said that all Christians are ignorant to the history of their faith. Not every Christian understands or knows what their religion has branched from which is why there is a problem in the education of Christianity, and other religions as well. You make it seem like I am trying to make a
scapegoat out of the
Christian faith and that is not what I am doing here.

The point is that there should be better religious education because the belief of virgin birth, angels, demons, hell, heaven, afterlife, one creator and supreme god, or many gods is not related to one religion alone. That is what makes some ignorant to their own faith. The reason why some believe that the faults of Christianity should stem from the Roman Catholic Church is from poor education so to say it is laughable is incorrect. People make decisions based on the information that was taught to them so to laugh in their face instead of helping them to understand the situation is in itself poor actions. No one ever stated that syncretism was wrong for Christianity and acceptable to other religions it is the idea of syncretism that is not known or understood by many Christians.

Whether Iulius Africanus decided the date for the birth of Christ or the Solar Deity was there first, is anyones guess. The fact is that we really dont know what actual day the Immaculate Conception took place or even the birth of Christ but no one would argue that it didnt take place because that would be disrespectful. So to say that the date of the "solar deity," as you put it, was figured out after the birth of Christ in essence is saying, " Ha ha, mine came first than yours." We really do not know, or will ever know, the actual dates that pertain to religious history because in the end it all relies on faith and what we do with that faith is what makes us who we are. Will we spend our time here on this Earth with the time alloted to us supporting other religions and educating others or will we one by one destroy them and see which one comes out on top?? It really doesnt matter who's God or Gods are better.....

Lucius Iulius Regulus





Gaius Equitius Cato <mlcinnyc@gmail. com> wrote:
Cato C. Fabio Buteoni Modiano L. Iulio Regulo SPD

Salvete.

Iulius Regulus, it's the comments like the one about Christianity
"losing its grip on the masses" that signify a shift from intellectual
discourse to a less edifying level.

The idea that Christians are, in general, ignorant of their own
history is simply too ridiculous to be countenanced. We have been
taught for decades now how terrible we are, how we have destroyed
civilization and undermined the nobility of the human spirit &c. You
would have to have grown up under a rock to be ignorant of the
innumerable, despicable faults of the past for which Christianity is
held solely responsible. What is especially laughable is the ordinary
assumption that the whole of Christian history is dependent upon the
history and actions of the Roman Catholic Church.

That some themes in the Christian faith should find resonance in other
belief systems is simply common sense: birth, death, resurrection,
guilt, sin, redemption, sacrifice, love - these are simply
transcendant human experiences and have been since humans began to
ponder their own existence and their place in the scheme of the
universe. As Fabius Modianus touched on, it is not the themes that
are unique, but rather the answers to the questions they raise that
separate one faith from another.

Christianity adopted many local seasonal celebrations as a means to
furthering the spread of the faith, which again is simply an
historical pattern common among all religions. That this syncretism
should be acceptable for others yet wrong for Christianity is an
ill-educated and poorly-considered idea.

It just so happens that in this particular instance, it seems that at
least one Christian writer (Iulius Africanus) had already calculated a
date for the celebration of the birth of Christ as 25 December - for
whatever reason - before any other "solar deity" had made his imprint.

Vale,

Cato

------------ --------- --------- ---
Looking for last minute shopping deals? Find them fast with Yahoo! Search.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]





Heute schon einen Blick in die Zukunft von E-Mails wagen? www.yahoo.de/mail

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53455 From: Maior Date: 2007-12-11
Subject: Re: a.s. II diem Natalem Christi
Salve Nabarz;
I had pointed out to Cato that Mithras, came a very long time
before Africanus figured out the birth of Jesus.
It is no surprise they coincide! It's called syncretism, beliefs
from the past blending with new ones, which is fine.
It's just that they are not unique;-)

When the Jewish people went into Exile in Persia they returned with
new beliefs: monotheism, heaven,hell, angels, judgement day, a
saviour etc all learned from Zoroastrians. Most people today have no
idea.

In Arabia there were gods such as Allah and female Allat, the Ka'aba
which has a meteorite embedded in it, was a common object of worship
among the Semites. Indeed in the Roman story of Cybele, Magna
Mater's coming to Rome, it was a simalcrum - the meteorite stone
that was brought from Anatolia.

see: Javier Teixidor "The Pagan God"
bene vale
Maior

> > least one Christian writer (Iulius Africanus) had already
calculated a
> > date for the celebration of the birth of Christ as 25 December -
for
> > whatever reason - before any other "solar deity" had made his
imprint.
> >
> Salve Cato,
>
> Putting the Armenian Church aside who celebrates Christmas on 6th
> ofJanuary still.
>
> Just to be clear, according Iulius Africanus Christ was conceived
(25
> March) i.e. shortly after Spring Equinox (21st March) and was born
> (25Dec) shortly after Winter Solstice (21 December).
>
> Perfect, now that is called an accurate Solar god ;-)
>
> Christ as a light of world, is conceived at the balance of
light/dark,
> and born at time of darkness, bringing light to world. Sounds good
to me.
>
> The winter solstice and return of light has been marked and
celebrated
> for a very long time before Christ, for physical evidence e.g look
at
> sites like Stonehenge.
>
> Anyway have a great Christmas, Winter Solstice, Yule, Shabe Yalda,
> Alban Arthuran etc...
>
> I guess the point is many people from different cultures and
religions
> celebrate return and birth of light, the label we give it is
secondary
> imho.
>
> Regards,
> Nabarz
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53456 From: Gens Iulia Date: 2007-12-11
Subject: Re: Narbaz
Vale!.
A few lines to say that I'm really glad to have this wonderful opportunity.
I've read your essay on Mithras and Mithraism which was originally hosted by
an University, where you mention Kipling's poem. There are a few questions
which, if you allow me, I'd like to pose, maybe offlist or at the Mithras
ML.
Salve.!
Gaia Iulia Agrippa.


----- Original Message -----
From: "Nabarz" <nabarz@...>
To: <Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Monday, December 10, 2007 7:13 PM
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: a.s. II diem Natalem Christi



Salve Maior,


An interesting academic paper on Persian Mithra, Roman Mithras and
Christ connection is on:
http://www.cais-soas.com/CAIS/Religions/iranian/Mithraism/mithra.htm

Roman Mithras was a syncretic religion; a mixture of Greek, Roman and
Persian.

Here is a short excerpt from chapter 9 â?~Four Stations of Mithraâ?T in
â?~The Mysteries of Mithras: The Pagan Belief That Shaped the Christian
Worldâ?T (Inner Traditions, 2005).

YULEâ?"BIRTH OF THE SUN
By Nabarz

At Yule night the clouds are breaking
Pour Old Wine into the cup
Friends celebrate this night
When does god give you a second life?
- A traditional Persian Yule poem, translation by Nabarz

Yule is the time of the rebirth of the sun, identified variously as
Lugh, Mabon, Arthur, Mithras, Christ, Horus. In the Persian calendar,
Yule is called Yalda or Shab-e Yalda and is celebrated on December 21.
It is the time of the winter solstice; it is the eve of the birth of
Mithra.

According to Massumeh Price, 'The Persians adopted their annual
renewal festival from the Babylonians and incorporated it into the
rituals of their own Zoroastrian religion. The last day of the Persian
month Azar is the longest night of the year, when the forces of
Ahriman are assumed to be at the peak of their strength. The next day,
the first day of the month â?oDayâ? known as â?okhoram roozâ? or â?okhore
rooz� (the day of sun) belongs to Ahura Mazda, the Lord of Wisdom.
Since the days are getting longer and the nights shorter, this day
marks the victory of Sun over the darkness. The occasion was
celebrated in the festival of â?oDayganâ? dedicated to Ahura Mazda, on
the first day of the month â?oDay.â? Fires would be burnt all night to
ensure the defeat of the forces of Ahriman. There would be feasts,
acts of charity and a number of deities were honoured, and prayers
performed to ensure the total victory of sun that was essential for
the protection of winter crops. There would be prayers to Mithra
(Mehr) and feasts in his honour, since Mithra is the Eyzad responsible
for protecting â?othe light of the early morning,â? known as
â?oHavangah.â?
It was also assumed that Ahura Mazda would grant peopleâ?Ts wishes;
especially those with no offspring had the hope to be blessed with
children if they performed all rites on this occasion. One of the
themes of the festival was the temporary subversion of order. Masters
and servants reversed roles. The king dressed in white would change
place with ordinary people. A mock king was crowned and masquerades
spilled into the streets. As the old year died, rules of ordinary
living were relaxed. This tradition persisted till the Sassanian
period, and is mentioned by Biruni and others in their recordings of
pre-Islamic rituals and festivals. Its origin goes back to the
Babylonian New Year celebration. These people believed the first
creation was order that came out of chaos. To appreciate and celebrate
the first creation, they had a festival and all roles were reversed.
Disorder and chaos ruled for a day and eventually order was restored
and succeeded at the end of the festival.1

Furthermore, according to the Web site iranheritage.com:
It was said that Mithra was born out of the light that came from
within the Alborz Mountains. Ancient Iranians would gather in caves
along the mountain range throughout the night to witness this miracle
together at dawn. They were known as â?oYar-e Gharâ? (Cave Mates). In
Iran today, despite the advent of Islam and Muslim rituals, Shab-e
Yalda is still celebrated widely. It is a time when friends and family
gather together to eat, drink and read poetry (especially Hafiz) until
well after midnight. Fruits and nuts are eaten, and pomegranates and
watermelons are particularly significant. The red colour in these
fruits symbolizes the crimson hues of dawn and the glow of life,
invoking the splendour of Mithra. Because Shab-e Yalda is the longest
and darkest night, it has come to symbolize many things in Persian
poetry: separation from a loved one, loneliness and waiting. After
Shab-e Yalda a transformation takes placeâ?"the waiting is over, light
shines and goodness prevails. As poet Saadi says:

The sight of you each morning is a New Year
Any night of your departure is the eve of Yule (Saâ?Tadi)
With all my pains, there is still the hope of recovery
Like the eve of Yule, there will finally be an end (Saâ?Tadi).2

Some years ago I tried to capture the spirit of Yule and its essence
as a international global festival by writing this Yule poem:

Yule
The sun is setting low on the western horizon.
Sky serpent swallowing him once more
Yule night has arrived; sunâ?Ts longest slumbers.

We eat and drink all that is red
Wine, pomegranate, and watermelon,
The color of dawn, reminders of what we eagerly wait for.

Shamash, Marduk, Sekhmet,
Descending immortals, youâ?Tll rise again
Apollo, Ra, salutations to you.

Good night Osiris, weak and tired lying in your coffin,
Enclosed by darkness, tricked by Seth again!
An infant sun is born, Horus soaring up into the sky.

Mithras, born of a rock and out from the cave,
Becoming Sol Invictus and turning the wheel
Darkness, now a fading memory.

The Oak king sings outside, as the Holly king lays slain
Dawn has arrived, Yule has ended.
Drink up your wine.

The above article is a short excerpt from chapter 9 â?~Four Stations of
Mithraâ?T in â?~The Mysteries of Mithras: The Pagan Belief That Shaped the
Christian Worldâ?T (Inner Traditions, 2005).

References:
1. www.persianoutpost.com/htdocs/yalda.html
2. www.iranheritage.com/programmes/yalda_back.htm

Regards,
Nabarz

http://www.myspace.com/nabarz

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Maior" <rory12001@...> wrote:
>
> Salve Nabarz;
>
> No, you are not too late at all. Most of us here are not in England,
> as we would love to watch your programme. I would buy it.
>
> I am in the U.S., Gaia Iulia in Argentina, Tutor in the Czech
> republic, Minervalis France, Aquila Germany.
>
> So would you explain is Persian Mithras (Mehr) the same as Roman
> Mithras? And is December 25th the birth of the hero Mithras from the
> All Virgin Anahita?
>
> Many people here, hear that this holiday is something unique to
> Christianity and need to know the historical syncretic roots of
> Christmas.
>
> Any scholarly references would be appreciated! We could write an
> article for our NRwiki, in fact a Mithras section would be ideal.
> bene vale
> Marca Hortensia Maior
> >
> > 'Will the Real Jesus Please Stand Up'
> > 'How would you feel if you discovered that the traditional story of
> > Jesus that begins at Christmas with the nativity wasn't quite as
> > unique as you might have thought?
> >
> >
>





Yahoo! Groups Links





--
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.17.1/1181 - Release Date: 11/12/07
05:05 p.m.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53457 From: Gens Iulia Date: 2007-12-11
Subject: HAPPY HANNUKAH!!... plus a few other issues
Salvete!!!:
Well!!, yesterday I turned my computer off in order to attend the local Hanukah -Rosh Iodesh Tevet celebration. Our Major allowed one of our public squares to be used by the local Jewish community, so a nice fair (food, handcrafts, and book stalls, as well as chairs, lights and a platform for assorted musical numbers and entertainers) was set. Got a wonderful book on Cabala and Jewish mysticism, right from the University of Jerusalem (locally translated). Quite useful, as I'm currently researching differences between Hermetic Cabala and Jewish Cabala. Plus we stuffed our faces with all the assorted, traditional, very tasty foods being sold.
Personal bit aside... I simply don't know how to start addressing all the different topics raised during these few hours.
First of all, while I can follow Cato's reference on December 25th... bottom line, it was set by an Imperial order. Of course, all these arguments mentioned by Iulius Africanus in 221 CE might have been used by one of Constantine's sons, Constancio, to declare such date as Jesus' birth in 345. According to Andre Piganiol (Histoire de Rome, ed. Clio, France, 1939 - Spanish translation by R. Anaya, EUDEBA, 1954), religion was seen by Constancio (somebody will surely provide the name in Latin) as one of the most powerful, essential tools for the State. In 353, he had ordered all "Pagan" temples to be closed, confiscated all properties and prohibited sacrifices. Of course, as you all surely know, all these politics allowed Julian to come into power.
Secondly, if we are to exercise our right to free speech, as I have stated in my last mail to Cato, one is prone to find opposition, and likely engage into some sort of exchange. Using the "offence" card... well, I cannot see it as fair play. All of us are adults, and while misunderstanding can arise (mainly if we try to figure out the other person's motivation according to our own logic...) I think that sticking strictly to what each one has written is the safest bet, in order to avoid the aforesaid misunderstanding. I think there is a confusion between having the right to disagree, and finding that disagreement offensive.
While I PERSONALLY AGREE with what Modianus expressed in his post dated Dec 11th, mentioning Kierkegaard... whether Christianity doesn't need, as a whole (not as a particular, personal spiritual path), historical proof... if it were so, we wouldn't have so many Biblical archaeologists and the like, trying to find Jericho's walls, the remains of Noah's Ark, or which John wrote the Apocalypse.
Why, many Christian Gnostic branches, which even considered the canonical Gospels as metaphors (relying more on Thomas, Philip, Pistis Sophia, the Gospel of Truth and so on), would still be alive and kicking (well, some people say they are...) if actual "proof" wouldn't have been needed. By simply saying that Jesus might not have really existed (or that he was simply a man, who achieved a superhuman feat) they got themselves considered heretic and destroyed.
Not mentioning all the Intelligent Design, Scientific Creationism or Flood Geology stuff (which I WILL NOT DISCUSS HERE).
One last thing though, to Cato. I think your reference Dec 10th - Martin Beck) is ignoring that the latest discoveries performed in Spain have found mosaics where Sol Invictus and Mithras are represented as separate Deities, one being the Cosmic Sun, and the other the Hypercosmic Sun (in a rather neo-platonic fashion). I know that taking both as one was a quite common view, but this is changing.
Valete!.
Gaia Iulia Agrippa.


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53458 From: marius.lupus Date: 2007-12-11
Subject: Daily rituals in latin
C.Marius Lupus omnes salutat.

Dear all,
I have looked for the daily rituals in the web page
http://www.novaroma.org/nr/Daily_Rituals_%28Nova_Roma%29

The ritual is in English, but the primary source is reported:
is there available a latin version of the daily ritual?

Valete omnes

C.Marius Lupus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53459 From: marcushoratius Date: 2007-12-11
Subject: Hoc Agete! [ a. d. III Eidus Decembris]
M Moravius Piscinus C. Petronio Dexteri SPD:

Oh, definitely, and not the only instance where assasination was
posed as a sacred duty on the "altar" of the res publica.

A caeremonia, or just at the start of a pompa leading to a sacrum,
would begin with the formula "Hoc age!" or Hoc agete!" meaning "Give
your attention in this." or "Pay attention."

That formula would also be used by a herald or a rhetortician, along
with the gesture of the index and middle fingers extended. Like the
statue of Augustus from the Prima Porta. Here too, though, in a more
secular setting, the gesture and the formula of "Hoc age" would have
a religious significance.

It would invoke in those who heard this exclamation a decorum of
silentium. That term does not mean "silence" exactly, but more the
kind of reverent respect that one might adopt in entering a mosque,
or Buddhist temple, or Christian cathedral.

So Chaereas is described as drawing attention to his act, but in a
religious sense, in which he posed, and probably believed, that this
was a sacred duty for him to perform.

A good observation. Thank you.

Vale optime
Piscinus



--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Gaius Petronius Dexter"
<jfarnoud94@...> wrote:
>
> G. Petronius Dexter M. Moravio Piscino Horatiano SPD.
>
> > Janus must be propitiated on the Agonal day.
> > The day may take its name from the girded priest
> > At whose blow the God's sacrifice is felled:
> > Always, before he stains the naked blade with hot blood,
> > He asks if he should, "agatne?" and won't unless commanded.
>
> You have reference of that in Suetonius about the murder of Caius
> Caesar : 58 " alii tradunt alloquenti pueros a tergo Chaeream
> cervicem gladio caesim graviter percusisse praemissa voce : "Hoc
age!"
>
> In my bad English :
> Others relate when [Caligula] was speaking with children Chaereas
> from behind struck his neck with a sword pronouncing : "hoc age!"
>
> This murder is shown here like a sacrifice.
>
> G.Petronius Dexter.
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53460 From: Maior Date: 2007-12-11
Subject: Re: HAPPY HANNUKAH!!... plus a few other issues
Salve Gaia Iulia:
many thanks for the holiday wishes, as I am Jewish, a nice
syncretic one:)
Now I definitely would like to visit Argentina from your
description y puedo hablar en Español.

I know a tiny bit about Kabbalah, it came from the Greeks, ideas of
demonology, metempsychosis etc..
You might enjoy this book:
"The Last Kabbalist of Lisbon" by Richard Zimler,
it does a fantastic job of recreating the mental world medieval
mystical Jews lived in.

Also Rabbi Adin Steinsalz is considered a world authority on
Kabbalah. Here is an article for you. I hope it is helpful.
http://www.steinsaltz.org/dynamic/essay_details.asp?id=5
bene valete
Marca Hortensia Maior

> Salvete!!!:
> Well!!, yesterday I turned my computer off in order to attend the
local Hanukah -Rosh Iodesh Tevet celebration. Our Major allowed one
of our public squares to be used by the local Jewish community, so a
nice fair (food, handcrafts, and book stalls, as well as chairs,
lights and a platform for assorted musical numbers and entertainers)
was set. Got a wonderful book on Cabala and Jewish mysticism, right
from the University of Jerusalem (locally translated). Quite useful,
as I'm currently researching differences between Hermetic Cabala and
Jewish Cabala. Plus we stuffed our faces with all the assorted,
traditional, very tasty foods being sold.
>>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53461 From: Lucius Rutilius Minervalis Date: 2007-12-11
Subject: Re: a.s. II diem Natalem Christi
Salvete Omnes,

"Compelle intrare."

St Luc (XIV,23)

Valete,

Lucius Rutilius Minervalis
Stultus Paganus

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Gaius Equitius Cato" <mlcinnyc@...>
wrote:

> We have been
> taught for centuries now how terrible we are, how we have destroyed
> civilization and undermined the nobility of the human spirit [...]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53462 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2007-12-11
Subject: Re: a.s. II diem Natalem Christi
Cato T. Flavio Aquilae L. Iulio Regulo Nabarz (I have no idea how to
decline that properly!) M. Hortensiae Maiori omnibus in Forumque SPD

Salvete.

Narbaz, the difference in dates is merely the transposition from one
calendar to the other, so I guess in essence the Old Style calendrists
are actually celebrating on the 25th of December - it just falls on
the 7th of January. In a congress held in AD 1923, the Eastern
Churches adopted a modified Gregorian Calendar and decided to set the
date of Easter according to the astronomical Full Moon for the
meridian of Jerusalem. However, a variety of practices remain - with
regard to the "fixed" Feasts, the Churches of Constantinople, Romania,
Alexandria, Antioch, Poland, Greece, and Cyprus adopted the New
Calendar in 1923, and Bulgaria in 1968. Russia, Serbia, Armenia, and
Jerusalem adhere to the Old Calendar.

On a side note, how would you decline your name? I'm thinking that
the Romans might have called you "Narbusus" or "Narbasus".

Iulius Regulus, I apologize if I saw more in your words than you
intended. In some ways, you are absolutely right - if it wasn't for a
common misconception about Christianity (i.e., that Roman Catholicism
is the be-all-and-end-all of Christian history) I wouldn't have felt
the need to say anything. And the only way to dispell that
misconception is through education. In some ways Christianity does
set itself up as a target precisely because at its heart it claims to
be that "single truth" that Flavius Aquila mentions. Christianity
does not recognize itself as actually "syncretizing" other beliefs or
practices as much as "fulfilling" them, or demonstrating how they are
brought to their most perfect expression through the revelation of
Christianity.

The Orthodox approach to God is much more tolerant of the
mystical and the mysterious aspects of spiritualism than is Western
theology. Theology in the West tends to emphasize the rational
pursuit of information about God and the systematic elimination of
all that is mysterious about Him. In contrast, Orthodoxy views the
mysterious as cause for worship, not scholastic contemplation and
examination. While Eastern Orthodox theologians value the
mysterious, they are not proponents of the irrational or
intellectually inconsistent. They think the intellect is important,
but they do not believe that it is the only criteria by which truth
should be judged. They assert instead that the highest form of
theology is experiential, not intellectual.

All that being said, I keep forgetting that this is a topic that will
never, ever, be resolved totally satisfactorily by anyone involved.
And rather than set hounds on each other, let's travel into the season
of the rebirth of Light in good spirits and concord.

Valete,

Cato
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53463 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2007-12-11
Subject: Hoc Agete! [ a. d. III Eidus Decembris]
Cato M. Moravio Piscino sal.

Salve.

Do you think that Iulius Caesar's assassination would fall in this
category?

Vale,

Cato

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "marcushoratius" <mhoratius@...> wrote:
>
> M Moravius Piscinus C. Petronio Dexteri SPD:
>
> Oh, definitely, and not the only instance where assasination was
> posed as a sacred duty on the "altar" of the res publica.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53464 From: liviacases Date: 2007-12-11
Subject: Rome, rooms of Augustus' house on the Palatine
L. Livia Plauta omnibus S.P.D.

This was posted on the italian list, but I thought I'd inform you
people here. These are gorgeus photos!

----- Original Message -----
From: "Francesco Valenzano" <fraelov@...>
To: <NR_Italia@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2007 12:51 AM
Subject: [NR_Italia] Roma, le sale mai viste della casa di Augusto al
Palatino


http://www.repubblica.it/2006/08/gallerie/spettacoliecultura/palatino-
augusto/1.html

Una delle quattro splendide sale affrescate, mai viste prima,
dell'ala est della casa di Augusto al Palatino, saranno aperte per la
prima volta al pubblico il 2 marzo. Si tratta di tre sale al piano
inferiore, alle quali si aggiunge un piccolo studiolo al piano
superiore che, secondo le ipotesi degli studiosi, dovrebbero
appartenere a una domus abitata da Augusto quando non era ancora
diventato imperatore
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53465 From: Publius Memmius Albucius Date: 2007-12-11
Subject: Re: Rome, rooms of Augustus' house on the Palatine
P. Memmius Albucius L. Liviae Plautae s.d.

Thanks for this precious link!

Indeed, it is a great thing to see the inside of both domus, and not
just to hear about them!

For everyone, do not forget adding the end of the link
("augusto/1.html"), or it will not work.

Vale Livia et omnes,


P. Memmius Albucius



--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "liviacases" <cases@...> wrote:
>
> L. Livia Plauta omnibus S.P.D.
>
> This was posted on the italian list, but I thought I'd inform you
> people here. These are gorgeus photos!


http://www.repubblica.it/2006/08/gallerie/spettacoliecultura/palatino-
augusto/1.html

(..)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53466 From: iulius sabinus Date: 2007-12-11
Subject: Re: Rome, rooms of Augustus' - short link.
SALVETE!

The link using TinyURL is at :

http://tinyurl.com.au/x.php?cda

VALETE,
IVL SABINVS

Publius Memmius Albucius <albucius_aoe@...> wrote:
P. Memmius Albucius L. Liviae Plautae s.d.

Thanks for this precious link!

Indeed, it is a great thing to see the inside of both domus, and not
just to hear about them!

For everyone, do not forget adding the end of the link
("augusto/1.html"), or it will not work.

Vale Livia et omnes,

P. Memmius Albucius

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "liviacases" <cases@...> wrote:
>
> L. Livia Plauta omnibus S.P.D.
>
> This was posted on the italian list, but I thought I'd inform you
> people here. These are gorgeus photos!

http://www.repubblica.it/2006/08/gallerie/spettacoliecultura/palatino-
augusto/1.html

(..)






"Every individual is the architect of his own fortune" - Appius Claudius





---------------------------------
Looking for last minute shopping deals? Find them fast with Yahoo! Search.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53467 From: phoenixfyre17 Date: 2007-12-11
Subject: Re: Daily rituals in latin
Salve Mari Lupe,

The daily rituals are not available in Latin at this time. As the
author of them, I'm afraid to say that I am not well versed in
Latin, but if anyone would kindly take up the task of making a
translation into Latin, myself among other Cultores I'm sure would
be quite thankful.

Once a translation is made, I will see to it that the Latin version
is made available on the NR Wiki site. :-)

Vale optime,
Titus Iulius Nero

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "marius.lupus" <mariobasile@...>
wrote:
>
> C.Marius Lupus omnes salutat.
>
> Dear all,
> I have looked for the daily rituals in the web page
> http://www.novaroma.org/nr/Daily_Rituals_%28Nova_Roma%29
>
> The ritual is in English, but the primary source is reported:
> is there available a latin version of the daily ritual?
>
> Valete omnes
>
> C.Marius Lupus
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53468 From: phoenixfyre17 Date: 2007-12-11
Subject: Re: a.s. II diem Natalem Christi
Salve Nabarz,

I know in some Italian and Italian-American families, the Epiphany
is celebrated as the day when Befana (a kind old witch) delivers
gifts to children while flying around on her broom.

An older Italian version of the modern Santa Claus, if you will.

Vale optime,
Nero

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Nabarz" <nabarz@...> wrote:
>
>
> >
> > It just so happens that in this particular instance, it seems
that at
> > least one Christian writer (Iulius Africanus) had already
calculated a
> > date for the celebration of the birth of Christ as 25 December -
for
> > whatever reason - before any other "solar deity" had made his
imprint.
> >
> Salve Cato,
>
> Putting the Armenian Church aside who celebrates Christmas on 6th
> ofJanuary still.
>
> Just to be clear, according Iulius Africanus Christ was conceived
(25
> March) i.e. shortly after Spring Equinox (21st March) and was born
> (25Dec) shortly after Winter Solstice (21 December).
>
> Perfect, now that is called an accurate Solar god ;-)
>
> Christ as a light of world, is conceived at the balance of
light/dark,
> and born at time of darkness, bringing light to world. Sounds good
to me.
>
> The winter solstice and return of light has been marked and
celebrated
> for a very long time before Christ, for physical evidence e.g look
at
> sites like Stonehenge.
>
> Anyway have a great Christmas, Winter Solstice, Yule, Shabe Yalda,
> Alban Arthuran etc...
>
> I guess the point is many people from different cultures and
religions
> celebrate return and birth of light, the label we give it is
secondary
> imho.
>
> Regards,
> Nabarz
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53469 From: Marcus Hirtius Date: 2007-12-11
Subject: Re: About Christians in Nova Roma
Hear Hear!

Thank you Gaius Equitius Cato.




---------------------------------
Never miss a thing. Make Yahoo your homepage.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53470 From: marcus_hirtius_ahenobarbus Date: 2007-12-11
Subject: Re: About Christians in Nova Roma
Salve,

"Oh yes, it was... The Christian faith destroyed the Roman
civilization. I am always sad to see panegyrics of traitors and
criminals like Constantine, who threw the world into chaos."

-Lucius Rutilius Minervalis


I do not agree with these statements.

The Empire was on the road to destruction before Constantine.

I think the destruction of the Western Empire had a little more to
do with hordes of Huns, Vandals, Visigoths and the like...and with
secular Roman corruption than with Christianity.

It was said, "Roman civilization", though I say Western Empire
considering that the Eastern Empire continued after the fall of the
West. And yes, Roman civilization evolved and Christianity was part
of that. But all cultures change with time. It is inevitable.

Roman civilization would have fallen or changed without
Christianity. It is just the natural order. If Attila had won at
Orleans or Chalons perhaps it would have been the Hunnic culture
that would have overtaken the Roman, or influenced it so heavily
that in time it would have been more Hunnic than Roman. Who knows?
All I am saying is that Rome was ready to fall and would have fallen
eventually regardless of Christian influence.

Vale,

M. Hirtius Ahenobarbus


--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Lucius Rutilius Minervalis"
<pjtuloup@...> wrote:
>
> Salvete Omnes,
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Bruno Cantermi" <brunocantermi@>
> wrote:
> Anyway, the Christian Faith was an important faith on the Roman
> Civilization.
> ---
>
>
> Oh yes, it was... The Christian faith destroyed the Roman
> civilization. I am always sad to see panegyrics of traitors and
> criminals like Constantine, who threw the world into chaos.
>
> Valete,
>
> Lucius Rutilius Minervalis
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53471 From: marcushoratius Date: 2007-12-11
Subject: Hoc Agete! [ a. d. III Eidus Decembris]
Salve Cato!

Oh



My



Gods.



To the assassins it did. Sic semper tyrrani! And all that, even if
they didn't say it.

The suicide of Lucius Cornelius Merula, the flamen Dialis, may be
another example, right there atop the ara of Jupiter Optimus
Maximus. On the Capitolium it was a definite eye-catcher, an
attention grabber, and it was so intended to be. He polluted the
altar with the stain of a human sacrifice, or so it amounted. For
over seventy years, not until Augustus named a new flamen Dialis in
11 BCE, the office remained vacant. Perhaps because he had in this
manner also polluted the office. Or, I think, with Gaius Caesar
named successor to Merula by Cinna, even though Sulla denied him the
office, there was some consideration that he might one day take his
office. He was a Iulii after all, hereditary high priest of Alba
Longa. Then there was the arson of the Capitolium; this was not part
of the fighting between the Sullatoriones and the Marians. It could
be that it was an attempt to purify the place so polluted by Merula.
And if that was what it was, a purification attempt, then that tells
us of the seriousness of the act, and perhaps the motivation behind
the act.

Vale optime
Piscinus



--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Gaius Equitius Cato"
<mlcinnyc@...> wrote:
>
> Cato M. Moravio Piscino sal.
>
> Salve.
>
> Do you think that Iulius Caesar's assassination would fall in this
> category?
>
> Vale,
>
> Cato
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "marcushoratius" <mhoratius@>
wrote:
> >
> > M Moravius Piscinus C. Petronio Dexteri SPD:
> >
> > Oh, definitely, and not the only instance where assasination was
> > posed as a sacred duty on the "altar" of the res publica.
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53472 From: Maior Date: 2007-12-11
Subject: Re: Daily rituals in latin
Maior Lupo Neroque sal;
Nero, why not ask the Sodalitas Latinitas to help you
translate them into Latin?

Also Lupe, here is a link to M. Moravius Piscinus' web page with
prayers in Latin.
http://www.societasviaromana.net/Collegium_Religionis/lararium.php
bene valete
Maior
>
> Salve Mari Lupe,
>
> The daily rituals are not available in Latin at this time. As the
> author of them, I'm afraid to say that I am not well versed in
> Latin, but if anyone would kindly take up the task of making a
> translation into Latin, myself among other Cultores I'm sure would
> be quite thankful.
>
> Once a translation is made, I will see to it that the Latin
version
> is made available on the NR Wiki site. :-)
>
> Vale optime,
> Titus Iulius Nero
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "marius.lupus" <mariobasile@>
> wrote:
> >
> > C.Marius Lupus omnes salutat.
> >
> > Dear all,
> > I have looked for the daily rituals in the web page
> > http://www.novaroma.org/nr/Daily_Rituals_%28Nova_Roma%29
> >
> > The ritual is in English, but the primary source is reported:
> > is there available a latin version of the daily ritual?
> >
> > Valete omnes
> >
> > C.Marius Lupus
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53473 From: marius.lupus Date: 2007-12-11
Subject: Re: Daily rituals in latin
Salve Iuli Nero.

Thank you for your answer and for the rituals you wrote: I believe that
they play a very important role in the reconstructionism of Religio
Romana.
As you can see, I have appreciated them so much that I am looking for a
latin version.

Vale optime,

Lupus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53474 From: marius.lupus Date: 2007-12-12
Subject: Re: a.s. II diem Natalem Christi
Salve Nero,

I confirm that in Italy on the 6th the Epiphany is celebrated with
the day of Befana.
The origin is clearly not Christian, even thought "befana" could be a
vulgarisation of "epiphania".

It is interesting to note that in the north of Italy there is the
tradition to set up in the country villages a big pyra on the 6th.
Over the pyra an image of an old lady is burned. The direction of the
smoke is used to determine the future. I have seen also the people
running around the pyras to present wishes for the new year.

Last year I moved from Italy to Germany, and I was surprise to find a
similar pyra-tradition on January 6th.

It looks to be a very old pagan ritual, but I ignore if the origin is
Celtic or what else.

Vale optime,
Lupus


--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "phoenixfyre17" <phoenixfyre17@...>
wrote:
>
> Salve Nabarz,
>
> I know in some Italian and Italian-American families, the Epiphany
> is celebrated as the day when Befana (a kind old witch) delivers
> gifts to children while flying around on her broom.
>
> An older Italian version of the modern Santa Claus, if you will.
>
> Vale optime,
> Nero
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Nabarz" <nabarz@> wrote:
> >
> >
> > >
> > > It just so happens that in this particular instance, it seems
> that at
> > > least one Christian writer (Iulius Africanus) had already
> calculated a
> > > date for the celebration of the birth of Christ as 25 December -

> for
> > > whatever reason - before any other "solar deity" had made his
> imprint.
> > >
> > Salve Cato,
> >
> > Putting the Armenian Church aside who celebrates Christmas on 6th
> > ofJanuary still.
> >
> > Just to be clear, according Iulius Africanus Christ was conceived
> (25
> > March) i.e. shortly after Spring Equinox (21st March) and was born
> > (25Dec) shortly after Winter Solstice (21 December).
> >
> > Perfect, now that is called an accurate Solar god ;-)
> >
> > Christ as a light of world, is conceived at the balance of
> light/dark,
> > and born at time of darkness, bringing light to world. Sounds
good
> to me.
> >
> > The winter solstice and return of light has been marked and
> celebrated
> > for a very long time before Christ, for physical evidence e.g
look
> at
> > sites like Stonehenge.
> >
> > Anyway have a great Christmas, Winter Solstice, Yule, Shabe Yalda,
> > Alban Arthuran etc...
> >
> > I guess the point is many people from different cultures and
> religions
> > celebrate return and birth of light, the label we give it is
> secondary
> > imho.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Nabarz
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53475 From: Adriano Rota Date: 2007-12-12
Subject: Re: About Christians in Nova Roma
Salvete,

I follow the discussion here and as a political scientist I find it very interesting.

Please do not forget that without the Roman Catholic Church and Spirit it is very unlikely that we would be able to exchange such thoughts within nova Roma here at the web. Although a lot was changed and destroyed by the christian spirit, The Vatican is the last social core institution which preserves the cultural left leftovers. Without Rome the Vatican would not exist (Most likely). The ones which are questionable are the sectarian christian communities which do condemn all roman culture especially here in the US.
By the way, Rome never died. We all live in a very Roman empire of the 21st, the so called Western World or shall I say the Western empire. What it needs is a more natural awareness of our common culture and Roman inheritance in order to unite it and fill it with life and spirit again.
Long live NOVA ROMA.

Adriano P. Rota M.A.


----- Original Message ----
From: marcus_hirtius_ahenobarbus <marcushirtiusahenobarbus@...>
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2007 10:27:59 PM
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: About Christians in Nova Roma

Salve,

"Oh yes, it was... The Christian faith destroyed the Roman
civilization. I am always sad to see panegyrics of traitors and
criminals like Constantine, who threw the world into chaos."

-Lucius Rutilius Minervalis

I do not agree with these statements.

The Empire was on the road to destruction before Constantine.

I think the destruction of the Western Empire had a little more to
do with hordes of Huns, Vandals, Visigoths and the like...and with
secular Roman corruption than with Christianity.

It was said, "Roman civilization" , though I say Western Empire
considering that the Eastern Empire continued after the fall of the
West. And yes, Roman civilization evolved and Christianity was part
of that. But all cultures change with time. It is inevitable.

Roman civilization would have fallen or changed without
Christianity. It is just the natural order. If Attila had won at
Orleans or Chalons perhaps it would have been the Hunnic culture
that would have overtaken the Roman, or influenced it so heavily
that in time it would have been more Hunnic than Roman. Who knows?
All I am saying is that Rome was ready to fall and would have fallen
eventually regardless of Christian influence.

Vale,

M. Hirtius Ahenobarbus

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com, "Lucius Rutilius Minervalis"
<pjtuloup@.. .> wrote:
>
> Salvete Omnes,
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com, "Bruno Cantermi" <brunocantermi@ >
> wrote:
> Anyway, the Christian Faith was an important faith on the Roman
> Civilization.
> ---
>
>
> Oh yes, it was... The Christian faith destroyed the Roman
> civilization. I am always sad to see panegyrics of traitors and
> criminals like Constantine, who threw the world into chaos.
>
> Valete,
>
> Lucius Rutilius Minervalis
>





____________________________________________________________________________________
Looking for last minute shopping deals?
Find them fast with Yahoo! Search. http://tools.search.yahoo.com/newsearch/category.php?category=shopping

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53476 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2007-12-12
Subject: Hoc Agete! [ a. d. III Eidus Decembris]
Cato M. Moravio Piscino sal.

Salve Moravius Piscinus!


:-)


It's an interesting concept, the idea that the office itself might be
polluted by the "stain" of its previous occupant having killed himself
in such a spectacular (in every sense of the word) manner. Especially
as suicide was considered a proper - even noble - act under certain
circumstances.

Vale bene,

Cato
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53477 From: Titus Flavius Aquila Date: 2007-12-12
Subject: AW: [Nova-Roma] Re: a.s. II diem Natalem Christi / Saturnalia approa
Salvete Quirites,

as Saturnalia is approaching, a time of laughther, enjoyment and happiness, were we are as well reminded about the
construction of one of the oldest temples of Rome for God Saturn, lets get ready for joyful celebration .

Unfortunately we can not all join together for the sacrificium publicum in front of the Saturn -Temple on the Forum in Rome
anymore,followed by a convicium publicum ,but within our families we can celebrate and I am deeply convinced in the near
future we will have a real temple to celebrate in our eternal city. So get ready, get you presents for Saturnalia.

Join together for this festive period at the end of the year 2760 AUC.


Valete optime
Titus Flavius Aquila
Tribunus Plebis
Scriba Censoris KFBM
Nova Roma



----- Ursprüngliche Mail ----
Von: Gaius Equitius Cato <mlcinnyc@...>
An: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Gesendet: Mittwoch, den 12. Dezember 2007, 00:48:09 Uhr
Betreff: [Nova-Roma] Re: a.s. II diem Natalem Christi

Cato T. Flavio Aquilae L. Iulio Regulo Nabarz (I have no idea how to
decline that properly!) M. Hortensiae Maiori omnibus in Forumque SPD

Salvete.

Narbaz, the difference in dates is merely the transposition from one
calendar to the other, so I guess in essence the Old Style calendrists
are actually celebrating on the 25th of December - it just falls on
the 7th of January. In a congress held in AD 1923, the Eastern
Churches adopted a modified Gregorian Calendar and decided to set the
date of Easter according to the astronomical Full Moon for the
meridian of Jerusalem. However, a variety of practices remain - with
regard to the "fixed" Feasts, the Churches of Constantinople, Romania,
Alexandria, Antioch, Poland, Greece, and Cyprus adopted the New
Calendar in 1923, and Bulgaria in 1968. Russia, Serbia, Armenia, and
Jerusalem adhere to the Old Calendar.

On a side note, how would you decline your name? I'm thinking that
the Romans might have called you "Narbusus" or "Narbasus".

Iulius Regulus, I apologize if I saw more in your words than you
intended. In some ways, you are absolutely right - if it wasn't for a
common misconception about Christianity (i.e., that Roman Catholicism
is the be-all-and-end- all of Christian history) I wouldn't have felt
the need to say anything. And the only way to dispell that
misconception is through education. In some ways Christianity does
set itself up as a target precisely because at its heart it claims to
be that "single truth" that Flavius Aquila mentions. Christianity
does not recognize itself as actually "syncretizing" other beliefs or
practices as much as "fulfilling" them, or demonstrating how they are
brought to their most perfect expression through the revelation of
Christianity.

The Orthodox approach to God is much more tolerant of the
mystical and the mysterious aspects of spiritualism than is Western
theology. Theology in the West tends to emphasize the rational
pursuit of information about God and the systematic elimination of
all that is mysterious about Him. In contrast, Orthodoxy views the
mysterious as cause for worship, not scholastic contemplation and
examination. While Eastern Orthodox theologians value the
mysterious, they are not proponents of the irrational or
intellectually inconsistent. They think the intellect is important,
but they do not believe that it is the only criteria by which truth
should be judged. They assert instead that the highest form of
theology is experiential, not intellectual.

All that being said, I keep forgetting that this is a topic that will
never, ever, be resolved totally satisfactorily by anyone involved.
And rather than set hounds on each other, let's travel into the season
of the rebirth of Light in good spirits and concord.

Valete,

Cato





__________________________________ Ihr erstes Fernweh? Wo gibt es den schönsten Strand? www.yahoo.de/clever

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53478 From: Maior Date: 2007-12-12
Subject: Re: About Christians in Nova Roma
Salvete;
during the Dark Ages, the Jews and Muslims were preserving and
translating texts of the Ancient Greeks and Romans. That's how the
Christians of the West got it and the monks copied it....

Moses Maimonides:
At an early age, he developed an interest in the exact sciences and
philosophy. In addition to reading the works of Muslim scholars, he
also read those of the Greek philosophers made accessible through
Arabian translators.

Through the Guide for the Perplexed and the philosophical
introductions to sections of his commentaries on the Mishna,
Maimonides exerted an important influence on the Scholastic
philosophers, especially on Albert the Great, Thomas Aquinas, and
Duns Scotus. He was himself a Jewish Scholastic. ..... he acquired
an intimate acquaintance not only with Arab Muslim philosophy, but
with the doctrines of Aristotle.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maimonides

Nasir al din Al Tusi
Al-Tusi wrote many commentaries on Greek texts. These included
revised Arabic versions of works by Autolycus, Aristarchus, Euclid,
Apollonius, Archimedes, Hypsicles, Theodosius, Menelaus and Ptolemy.
In particular he wrote a commentary on Menelaus's Spherics (see [41]
for details), and Archimedes' On the sphere and cylinder (see [21]
for details). In the latter work al-Tusi discussed objections raised
by earlier mathematicians to comparing lengths of straight lines and
of curved lines. Al-Tusi argues that comparisons are legitimate,
despite the objections that, being different entities, they are
incomparable.

Ptolemy's Almagest was one of the works which Arabic scientists
studied intently. In 1247 al-Tusi wrote Tahrir al-Majisti
(Commentary on the Almagest) in which he introduced various
trigonometrical techniques to calculate tables of sines; see [5] for
details. As in the Zij-i Ilkhahi al-Tusi gave tables of sines with
entries calculated to three sexagesimal places for each half degree
of the argument.

One of al-Tusi's most important mathematical contributions was the
creation of trigonometry as a mathematical discipline in its own
right rather than as just a tool for astronomical applications. In
Treatise on the quadrilateral al-Tusi gave the first extant
exposition of the whole system of plane and spherical trigonometry.
As stated in [1]:-

http://www-history.mcs.st-and.ac.uk/Biographies/Al-Tusi_Nasir.htmT

Roma Antiqua was multi-racial and multi-faith. May the New Rome be
just that again!
bene valete
M. Hortensia Maior
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53479 From: L. Vitellius Triarius Date: 2007-12-12
Subject: Re: a.s. II diem Natalem Christi
Salvete,

Here is an interesting article on the Saturnalia and Christmas and
Easter.

http://www.ccg.org/english/s/p235.html

Vale optime,
Triarius
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53480 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2007-12-12
Subject: Re: Results, First Class (was Re: [Nova-Roma] Results of Comitia Cen
>
> A. Tullia Scholastica M. Arminio Maiori quiritibus bonae voluntatis S.P.D.
>
> Thank you very much for providing this interesting information. If we do
> in fact follow the law, especially while the voting is in progress, the
> citizenry can gain some perspective on how their magistrates and other
> officials are leaning, for the first class centuries seem to be largely
> composed of magistrates, religious officials, magistrates cum religious
> officials, and former magistrates who have held a number of offices. Of
> course, there is this little matter of ties, but one hopes that fortune favors
> the best candidate.
>
> We are nice enough here that we don¹t send everyone home once enough of
> the centuries have voted, in order of rank, and enough votes have been cast to
> elect a candidate to a given office, as seems to have been the practice in
> antiquity.
>
> It¹s somewhat surprising that overall, some centuriae seem not to have
> voted at all during the entire voting period (not just the restricted
> ones)...and that this occurs with some frequency, shall we say. I would like
> to see the unrestricted period lengthened, but the current division into
> centuria praerogativa, first class centuries, then the remaining centuriae, is
> both more Roman and more enlightening in progress when the law is followed, as
> it should be.
>
> Thank you again for your report.
>
> Vale, et valete.
>
>
> Salve
>
> --- "A. Tullia Scholastica" <fororom@...
> <mailto:fororom%40localnet.com> >
> escreveu:
>>> > > A. Tullia Scholastica Ti. Galerio Paulino M.
>> > Arminio Maiori quiritibus bonae
>>> > > voluntatis S.P.D.
>
>>> > > Results of Comitia Centuriata
>>> > > ATS: A couple of
>>> > > little points: [..] And could we
>>> > > please obey the Lex Fabia, however belatedly, and
>> > give the tally of the
>>> > > first-class centuries voting during the period set
>> > aside for them? We are
>>> > > required to obey the law. Dura fortasse, et
>> > difficilis fortasse, sed lex.
>
> Sorry for the quite belated report.
>
> Report for the first class of comitia centuriata:
>
> Of the 14 centurias of the First Class, nine voted in
> the announced timespan. The majority is then five
> centurias.
>
> - Censor:
> M. Hortensia Maior, 4 centuries
> Ti. Galerius Paulinus, 5 centuries
>
> The centuries of the first class favours Ti. Galerius
> for Censor.
>
> - Consul:
> M. Moravius Piscinus Horatianus, 3 centuries
> T. Iulius Sabinus, 6 centuries
>
> The centuries of the first class favours T. Iulius for
> Consul.
>
> - Praetor
> M. Curiatus Complutensis, 3 centuries
> M. Iulius Severus, 6 centuries
>
> The centuries of the first class favours M. Iulius for
> Praetor.
>
> Valete
> M.Arminius Maior
> Diribitor
>
>
>
> Messages in this topic
> <http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma/message/53005;



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53482 From: Nabarz Date: 2007-12-12
Subject: Re: About Christians in Nova Roma
Salve,

For those interested in Christianity and Rome, an academic book of
interest might be: 'The Archaeology of Religious Hatred' by Eberhard
W. Sauer (2004). The cover is a Mithras and Bull sculpture which has
been decapitated.

It was one of the books we included in the News section of Mithras
Reader An academic and religious journal of Greek, Roman, and
Persian Studies. Vol1.

There is a review of Eberhard W. Sauer book at:
http://www.ajaonline.org/pdfs/book_reviews/110.1/AJA1101_OSullivan.pd
f

see below.

His other related work 'The End of Paganism in the North-Western
Provinces of the Roman Empire. The Example of the Mithras Cult
(Oxford 1996)' could also be of interest to some here.

Peace and seasonal goodwill to all.

Regards,
Nabarz
www.myspace.com/nabarz

----
Online Publications: Book Reviews
AJA
110.1 (January 2006)
American Journal of Archaeology Online Book Review
Copyright © 2006 by the Archaeological Institute of America
The Archaeology of Religious
Hatred in the Roman and Early
Medieval World
by Eberhard Sauer. Pp. 192, b&w pls. 77, color pls. 25. Tempus
Publishing, Stroroud & Charleston 2003. £17.99/$29.99. ISNB 0-7524-
2530-7 (paper).
The signature of religious hatred in the archaeological record is
rarely explicitly transcribed.
In this well-illustrated book aimed at a general audience, Eberhard
Sauer uses archaeological data to explore the destruction and damage
to pagan temples in the later Roman
world, arguing that Christian intolerance can be detected in the way
in which images of pagan gods were disfigured or destroyed. The
author draws some passing parallels with more recent times, notably
the 16th-century European
Reformation and the Taliban destruction of the Bamiyan temples in
2001, but on the whole he sticks closely to his specific brief.
There are two principal foci: the destruction of mithraea in the
Rhineland and elsewhere, and the mutilation
and modification of pagan temples in Egypt and selected loci in the
Near East.
Changes in imperial policy in the fourth century, involving the
official recognition of Christianity under Constantine and the later
proscription of pagan rites by Theodosius, offer the crucial time
frame within which this destruction may be viewed. The key debate is
obviously not whether pro-Christian imperial policy existed but the
extent to which it was effectively and widely enforced. However, the
archaeological data are not simply testimony to its success; they
also offer important insights into religious interactions at a much
more human
and emotional level.
Sauer freely recognizes that for later Christian
writers and hagiographers the destruction of idols by monastic
leaders and evangelizers had become a standard trope, referencing
both the Old and New Testament and more contemporary
directives, such as those of Augustine of Hippo. In effect, it was a
performative way of demonstrating the authority of the new Christian
order. One of his more intriguing images is of a (now lost?)
Christian catacomb painting in Rome (fig. 36:7), which seems to show
the toppling of a pagan statue. Another practice, identified within
and without the empire, involved overwriting; at Kilcolman in Kerry,
text and Christian cross are imposed on a standing boulder,
potentially a pagan marker of some kind (color pl. 2).
Drawing on his own extensive researches in the northwestern
provinces, the author reconstructs
the physical process of destruction at a number of pagan sites. The
Mithras temples of Dieburg, Sarrebourg, and Koenigshoffen (among
others) were subjected to intensive physical destruction; statues
were broken into small pieces and iconographic panels smashed with
metal tools. Sauer argues with some conviction that the motivation
behind such focused mutilation can be explained best by religious
intolerance.
The Egyptian evidence is a bit more complex.
Chapter 7 discusses the disfigurement of statues and reliefs of gods
in temple facades when the buildings came into Christian hands.
Taking the Temple of Dendara as his main case study, he identifies
the painstaking way in which the anthropomorphic figures of gods and
goddesses were literally defaced and the surface of their bodies
covered with systematic hacking. The overall iconographic scheme was
left intact, however, and the hieroglyphic texts were usually
undamaged. Although very extensive, the mutilation was not
comprehensive.
What purpose did this activity serve? It is not certain whether the
temple itself was converted to a church, although there were
churches nearby. Sauer's explanations center on the functional,
arguing that the extent of mutilation is probably related to
difficulty of access, and that nonhuman pagan representations
were spared because they were viewed as "harmless" (97). He
emphasizes the energy expended by the iconoclasts, but it could be
argued, against this, that the mutilation is in every sense
superficial and in the long term unsuccessful. The pagan monument
remains standing and wholly recognizable to modern tourists as a
shrine to the goddess Hathor. Farther up the Nile at Philae, small
marigold crosses identical to those incised on the Irish Ogham stone
mark the portals of the shrine of Isis, which has been similarly
though less extensively defaced. This houses a Christian altar, but
after the passage of more than 1,500 years the Christian presence
again seems slight, and this is not simply because of colonial
Egyptologists' traditional lack of interest in conserving Christian
archaeology. The date of the mutilation program remains unknown, as
does its duration, but it would clearly repay further study and
perhaps a slightly less oppositional
approach.
To a certain extent, Sauer has also used this book, especially the
conclusions, as a platform to refute critics of the theses advanced
in his earlier monograph, The End of Paganism in the North-Western
Provinces of the Roman Empire. The Example of the Mithras Cult
(Oxford 1996). This has resulted in a fixation on coins and
chronology,
understandable in the context of battles with peer historians but
unfortunately detracting
to some extent from the book's wider appeal—
although it is written in an engagingly discursive style,
encouraging the reader to speculate (with the author) about probable
interpretations of individual situations.
The writer avoids any abstract discussion of intolerance,
alienation, and identity although there are many intermittent
engagements with general narratives about the rise of Christianity,
the origins and spread of the cults of Mithras and Isis, and the
relationship of their belief systems to Christian tenets. In his
conclusion, he strongly identifies with the general idea that
Christian intolerance of other belief systems was crucial to its own
success. In fact, he has assembled a range of evidence that
testifies to the diversity of contexts for religious intolerance,
for which empire-wide generalizations seem inappropriate.
The main strength of the book lies in the way the author takes a
genuinely fresh look at how archaeological evidence can be viewed.
The taphonomy of broken statues and smashed reliefs may be of no
interest to the traditional academic custodians of monumental art,
but it is a fruitful and thought-provoking use of the results of
excavations conducted to modern standards of detailed recording. I
am sure that many of the ideas in this work will be taken up
elsewhere.
Deirdre O'Sullivan
schoo
l of archaeology and ancient historhistory
university of leicester
university road
leicester le1 7rh
united kingdom
dmo
@...
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53483 From: Nabarz Date: 2007-12-12
Subject: Re: Narbaz
Salve,

yes, sure just drop me an email offlist.


Regards,
Nabarz

www.myspace.com/nabarz


--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Gens Iulia" <maite_cat@...> wrote:
>
> Vale!.
> A few lines to say that I'm really glad to have this wonderful
opportunity.
> I've read your essay on Mithras and Mithraism which was originally
hosted by
> an University, where you mention Kipling's poem. There are a few
questions
> which, if you allow me, I'd like to pose, maybe offlist or at the
Mithras
> ML.
> Salve.!
> Gaia Iulia Agrippa.
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Nabarz" <nabarz@...>
> To: <Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com>
> Sent: Monday, December 10, 2007 7:13 PM
> Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: a.s. II diem Natalem Christi
>
>
>
> Salve Maior,
>
>
> An interesting academic paper on Persian Mithra, Roman Mithras and
> Christ connection is on:
> http://www.cais-
soas.com/CAIS/Religions/iranian/Mithraism/mithra.htm
>
> Roman Mithras was a syncretic religion; a mixture of Greek, Roman
and
> Persian.
>
> Here is a short excerpt from chapter 9 â?~Four Stations of Mithraâ?
T in
> â?~The Mysteries of Mithras: The Pagan Belief That Shaped the
Christian
> Worldâ?T (Inner Traditions, 2005).
>
> YULEâ?"BIRTH OF THE SUN
> By Nabarz
>
> At Yule night the clouds are breaking
> Pour Old Wine into the cup
> Friends celebrate this night
> When does god give you a second life?
> - A traditional Persian Yule poem, translation by Nabarz
>
> Yule is the time of the rebirth of the sun, identified variously as
> Lugh, Mabon, Arthur, Mithras, Christ, Horus. In the Persian
calendar,
> Yule is called Yalda or Shab-e Yalda and is celebrated on December
21.
> It is the time of the winter solstice; it is the eve of the birth
of
> Mithra.
>
> According to Massumeh Price, 'The Persians adopted their annual
> renewal festival from the Babylonians and incorporated it into the
> rituals of their own Zoroastrian religion. The last day of the
Persian
> month Azar is the longest night of the year, when the forces of
> Ahriman are assumed to be at the peak of their strength. The next
day,
> the first day of the month â?oDayâ? known as â?okhoram roozâ? or
â?okhore
> rooz� (the day of sun) belongs to Ahura Mazda, the Lord of
Wisdom.
> Since the days are getting longer and the nights shorter, this day
> marks the victory of Sun over the darkness. The occasion was
> celebrated in the festival of â?oDayganâ? dedicated to Ahura
Mazda, on
> the first day of the month â?oDay.â? Fires would be burnt all
night to
> ensure the defeat of the forces of Ahriman. There would be feasts,
> acts of charity and a number of deities were honoured, and prayers
> performed to ensure the total victory of sun that was essential for
> the protection of winter crops. There would be prayers to Mithra
> (Mehr) and feasts in his honour, since Mithra is the Eyzad
responsible
> for protecting â?othe light of the early morning,â? known as
> â?oHavangah.â?
> It was also assumed that Ahura Mazda would grant peopleâ?Ts wishes;
> especially those with no offspring had the hope to be blessed with
> children if they performed all rites on this occasion. One of the
> themes of the festival was the temporary subversion of order.
Masters
> and servants reversed roles. The king dressed in white would change
> place with ordinary people. A mock king was crowned and masquerades
> spilled into the streets. As the old year died, rules of ordinary
> living were relaxed. This tradition persisted till the Sassanian
> period, and is mentioned by Biruni and others in their recordings
of
> pre-Islamic rituals and festivals. Its origin goes back to the
> Babylonian New Year celebration. These people believed the first
> creation was order that came out of chaos. To appreciate and
celebrate
> the first creation, they had a festival and all roles were
reversed.
> Disorder and chaos ruled for a day and eventually order was
restored
> and succeeded at the end of the festival.1
>
> Furthermore, according to the Web site iranheritage.com:
> It was said that Mithra was born out of the light that came from
> within the Alborz Mountains. Ancient Iranians would gather in caves
> along the mountain range throughout the night to witness this
miracle
> together at dawn. They were known as â?oYar-e Gharâ? (Cave
Mates). In
> Iran today, despite the advent of Islam and Muslim rituals, Shab-e
> Yalda is still celebrated widely. It is a time when friends and
family
> gather together to eat, drink and read poetry (especially Hafiz)
until
> well after midnight. Fruits and nuts are eaten, and pomegranates
and
> watermelons are particularly significant. The red colour in these
> fruits symbolizes the crimson hues of dawn and the glow of life,
> invoking the splendour of Mithra. Because Shab-e Yalda is the
longest
> and darkest night, it has come to symbolize many things in Persian
> poetry: separation from a loved one, loneliness and waiting. After
> Shab-e Yalda a transformation takes placeâ?"the waiting is over,
light
> shines and goodness prevails. As poet Saadi says:
>
> The sight of you each morning is a New Year
> Any night of your departure is the eve of Yule (Saâ?Tadi)
> With all my pains, there is still the hope of recovery
> Like the eve of Yule, there will finally be an end (Saâ?Tadi).2
>
> Some years ago I tried to capture the spirit of Yule and its
essence
> as a international global festival by writing this Yule poem:
>
> Yule
> The sun is setting low on the western horizon.
> Sky serpent swallowing him once more
> Yule night has arrived; sunâ?Ts longest slumbers.
>
> We eat and drink all that is red
> Wine, pomegranate, and watermelon,
> The color of dawn, reminders of what we eagerly wait for.
>
> Shamash, Marduk, Sekhmet,
> Descending immortals, youâ?Tll rise again
> Apollo, Ra, salutations to you.
>
> Good night Osiris, weak and tired lying in your coffin,
> Enclosed by darkness, tricked by Seth again!
> An infant sun is born, Horus soaring up into the sky.
>
> Mithras, born of a rock and out from the cave,
> Becoming Sol Invictus and turning the wheel
> Darkness, now a fading memory.
>
> The Oak king sings outside, as the Holly king lays slain
> Dawn has arrived, Yule has ended.
> Drink up your wine.
>
> The above article is a short excerpt from chapter 9 â?~Four
Stations of
> Mithraâ?T in â?~The Mysteries of Mithras: The Pagan Belief That
Shaped the
> Christian Worldâ?T (Inner Traditions, 2005).
>
> References:
> 1. www.persianoutpost.com/htdocs/yalda.html
> 2. www.iranheritage.com/programmes/yalda_back.htm
>
> Regards,
> Nabarz
>
> http://www.myspace.com/nabarz
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Maior" <rory12001@> wrote:
> >
> > Salve Nabarz;
> >
> > No, you are not too late at all. Most of us here are not in
England,
> > as we would love to watch your programme. I would buy it.
> >
> > I am in the U.S., Gaia Iulia in Argentina, Tutor in the Czech
> > republic, Minervalis France, Aquila Germany.
> >
> > So would you explain is Persian Mithras (Mehr) the same as Roman
> > Mithras? And is December 25th the birth of the hero Mithras from
the
> > All Virgin Anahita?
> >
> > Many people here, hear that this holiday is something unique to
> > Christianity and need to know the historical syncretic roots of
> > Christmas.
> >
> > Any scholarly references would be appreciated! We could write an
> > article for our NRwiki, in fact a Mithras section would be ideal.
> > bene vale
> > Marca Hortensia Maior
> > >
> > > 'Will the Real Jesus Please Stand Up'
> > > 'How would you feel if you discovered that the traditional
story of
> > > Jesus that begins at Christmas with the nativity wasn't quite
as
> > > unique as you might have thought?
> > >
> > >
> >
>
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.17.1/1181 - Release Date:
11/12/07
> 05:05 p.m.
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53484 From: Claudio Guzzo Date: 2007-12-12
Subject: Re: a.s. II diem Natalem Christi
Salve!
You wrote:
"Salvete! I do not care to read about christian holidays, but I see no reason
why this man can't post about them.
Valete,
Annia Minucia Marcella
http://www.myspace.com/novabritannia
http://novabritannia.org/
http://ciarin.com/governor"
I don't care too, but I think it is off topic.
Vale


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53485 From: David Kling (Modianus) Date: 2007-12-12
Subject: Collegium Pontificum voting results
QVOD BONVM FAVSTVM FELIX FORTVNATVMQVE SIT POPVLO ROMANO QUIRITIBVS

The Collegium Pontificum having met in order to vote on priesthood
applications and membership in the Comitia Curiata, the decision was
as follows:

Application of senatrix M. Hortensia Maior for the position of
Sacerdos Mentis.
Rejected. [2 Uti Rogas, 4 Antiquo, & 1 Abstention]

Application of T. Arminius Genialis for the position of Flamen Furrinalis.
Rejected. [2 Uti Rogas, & 5 Antiquo]

Application of senator Fl. Galerius Aurelianus for the position of Pontifex.
Approved. [7 Uti Rogas]

Application of senator Marcus Moravius Piscinus for the position of Pontifex.
Approved. [6 Uti Rogas & 1 Antiquo]

The following members of the Comitia curiata were placed before the
Collegium Pontificum for removal:

Lucius Cornelius Sulla Felix (inactive).
Lucius Fabius Metellus (capite censi).
Titus Labienus Fortunatus (capite censi).
Gaius Geminius Germanus (capite censi).
Gaius Iulius Scaurus (unsubscribed from the comitia curiata e-mail list).

All retained. [4 to retain & 3 to remove]

The Collegium Pontificum was convened on 9 December by Pontifex Caeso
Fabius Buteo Modianus and voting was declared ended on 12 December
after all the pontifices had voted.

prid. Id. Dec. L. Arminio Ti. Galerio cos. (MMDCCLX a.u.c.)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53486 From: os390account Date: 2007-12-12
Subject: Re: a.s. II diem Natalem Christi
Salvete Quirites!

Same ingredients. Different recipes.

Cookies, cakes, puff pastries. Why don't we simply recline, and
enjoy this convivial banquet of human introspection, faith, and
societal cohabitation?

Valete,
Q. Valerius Callidus



--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Claudio Guzzo"
<claudio.guzzo@...> wrote:
>
> Salve!
> You wrote:
> "Salvete! I do not care to read about christian holidays, but I
see no reason
> why this man can't post about them.
> Valete,
> Annia Minucia Marcella
> http://www.myspace.com/novabritannia
> http://novabritannia.org/
> http://ciarin.com/governor"
> I don't care too, but I think it is off topic.
> Vale
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53487 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2007-12-12
Subject: Re: About Christians in Nova Roma
Cato omnes SPD

Salvete.

Other books you might find interesting are:



"The History of The Byzantine State" - Ostrogorsky (Rutgers)

"Christianity and the Classical World" - Pelikan, (Yale)

"The First Century" - Klingaman (HarperCollins)

"God Against The Gods; a History of the War between Monotheism and
Polytheism" - Kirsch (Viking Compass)

"The Fall of The Roman Empire" - Heather (Oxford)


Valete,

Cato
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53488 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2007-12-12
Subject: Re: a.s. II diem Natalem Christi
Cato omnes SPD

Salvete.

Here's a different take on Christianity and Mithraism:

http://www.tektonics.org/copycat/mithra.html

http://christopherbutler.wordpress.com/2006/10/07/jesus-is-not-a-mithras-redux/

http://www.religionfacts.com/greco-roman/sects/mithraism.htm

Valete,

Cato


--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "L. Vitellius Triarius"
<lucius_vitellius_triarius@...> wrote:
>
> Salvete,
>
> Here is an interesting article on the Saturnalia and Christmas and
> Easter.
>
> http://www.ccg.org/english/s/p235.html
>
> Vale optime,
> Triarius
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53489 From: Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus Date: 2007-12-12
Subject: The Year of Concordia - The Tenth Anniversary of Nova Roma
Cn. Cornelius Lentulus summus sacerdos Pannoniae: consulibus, consulibus designatis, pontificibus, omnibusque sacerdotibus et Quiritibus s. p. d.:


Esteemed consules, consules designati and pontifices!


Nova Roma is going to arrive to its tenth anniversary and we must think about what kind of religious rites would be appropriate, convenient or necessary to its pious and good celebration. What are our big problems and who are those gods who weren't favourable enough for us?


I think that Dea Concordia is whom we must call, for several grave reasons that you - longstanding citizens of NR - I'm sure, know very well.

Nova Roma is too often suffers the lack of concord. Our continuous angry debutes, the secessions, resignations, civil hate and conflicts need remedy. Need remedy if we want to grow. And we indeed want to grow.

If we truly beleive gods help us when we pray them - we must pray them asking their help. It seems that Dea Concordia does not look at us favourably. She is waiting for expiation: and in my opinion, Dea Concordia would be well expiated if we consecrated the Anniversal Year to Her. What do you think, consules, consules designati and pontifices? It would be a fine and Roman thing to do!


Therefore I suggest our consules, consules designati and pontifices to take into consideration to consecrate the next year and dedicate to Dea Concordia and call it as "Annus Sacer Concordiae Novae Romae" - "The Sacred Year of the Concord of Nova Roma".

Let Godess Concordia have an official sacerdos and virtual temple, worship Her on every Kalends and Ides of 2761 with public prayers through the sacerdos Concordiae.

I was always a devoted worshipper of Dea Concordia and a voice of public concord and peace in Nova Roma, so if there would be no other qualified candidate, I would gladly apply to this priesthood and make the rites accurately and with competency, what you could see already from my public prayers.

This is my religious and pious suggestion for the Anniversary.

What do you say?



CURATE UT VALEATIS RESQUE PUBLICA VALEAT!






Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus,
QUAESTOR CANDIDATUS
R O G A T O R
------------------------------------------
Legatus Pro Praetore Provinciae Pannoniae
Sacerdos Provinciae Pannoniae
Interpres Linguae Hungaricae
Accensus Consulis Ti. Galerii Paulini
Scriba Praetricis A. Tulliae Scholasticae
Scriba Aedilis Curulis Iuliae Caesaris Cytheridis Aeges
Scriba Interpretis Linguae Latinae A. Tulliae Scholasticae
-------------------------------------------
Decurio I. Sodalitatis Latinitatis
Dominus Factionis Russatae
Latinista, Classicus Philologus


---------------------------------

---------------------------------
L'email della prossima generazione? Puoi averla con la nuova Yahoo! Mail

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53490 From: Gaius Petronius Dexter Date: 2007-12-12
Subject: Re: About Christians in Nova Roma
G.Petronius Dexter SPD,


When we speak about christianism we can have two points of vue.

If we want to be a classical Roman we think that christianism is a
superstition not a religion. So thought Nero, Tacitus, Suetonius,
Trajan... and all pagan Romans untill Constantine on 313.

Constantine was the first Pontifex Maximus who accepted and included
Christianism into the religions and with Theodosius christianism became
the one religion and he forbade the pagan rituals.

In fact, paganism is a polytheism and can accept the christian cult but
the christian religion/superstition, who is not polytheism, cannot
accept the pagan cults.

G. Petronius Dexter.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53491 From: David Kling (Modianus) Date: 2007-12-12
Subject: Re: The Year of Concordia - The Tenth Anniversary of Nova Roma
Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus Gnaeo Cornelio Lentulo salutem dicit

I would certainly support you if you applied to become a sacerdos
Condordiae. However, I am cautious of any efforts to declare the year
dedicated to Concordia. These sorts of efforts have been done before
to no lasting effect. Promises of working together have been done,
but never fulfilled. I'm cautious of such an initiative, because I
consider the motives of some suspect.

Vale:

Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus
Censor, Pontifex, et al.


On Dec 12, 2007 10:18 AM, Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus
<cn_corn_lent@...> wrote:
>
> Cn. Cornelius Lentulus summus sacerdos Pannoniae: consulibus, consulibus
> designatis, pontificibus, omnibusque sacerdotibus et Quiritibus s. p. d.:
>
>
> Esteemed consules, consules designati and pontifices!
>
>
> Nova Roma is going to arrive to its tenth anniversary and we must think
> about what kind of religious rites would be appropriate, convenient or
> necessary to its pious and good celebration. What are our big problems and
> who are those gods who weren't favourable enough for us?
>
>
> I think that Dea Concordia is whom we must call, for several grave reasons
> that you - longstanding citizens of NR - I'm sure, know very well.
>
> Nova Roma is too often suffers the lack of concord. Our continuous angry
> debutes, the secessions, resignations, civil hate and conflicts need remedy.
> Need remedy if we want to grow. And we indeed want to grow.
>
> If we truly beleive gods help us when we pray them - we must pray them
> asking their help. It seems that Dea Concordia does not look at us
> favourably. She is waiting for expiation: and in my opinion, Dea Concordia
> would be well expiated if we consecrated the Anniversal Year to Her. What do
> you think, consules, consules designati and pontifices? It would be a fine
> and Roman thing to do!
>
>
> Therefore I suggest our consules, consules designati and pontifices to take
> into consideration to consecrate the next year and dedicate to Dea Concordia
> and call it as "Annus Sacer Concordiae Novae Romae" - "The Sacred Year of
> the Concord of Nova Roma".
>
> Let Godess Concordia have an official sacerdos and virtual temple, worship
> Her on every Kalends and Ides of 2761 with public prayers through the
> sacerdos Concordiae.
>
> I was always a devoted worshipper of Dea Concordia and a voice of public
> concord and peace in Nova Roma, so if there would be no other qualified
> candidate, I would gladly apply to this priesthood and make the rites
> accurately and with competency, what you could see already from my public
> prayers.
>
> This is my religious and pious suggestion for the Anniversary.
>
> What do you say?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53492 From: Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus Date: 2007-12-12
Subject: Re: The Year of Concordia - The Tenth Anniversary of Nova Roma
Cn. Lentulus K. Modiano sal.


>>> I would certainly support you if you applied to become a sacerdos
Condordiae. <<<


I will apply if the citizenry thinks it's useful and necessary.


>>> However, I am cautious of any efforts to declare the year
dedicated to Concordia. <<<


You are right. We always must be cautious. The question is here, whether my initiative is important and worthy to be realized or it's too dangerous and if it is, then why?


>>> Promises of working together have been done, but never fulfilled. I'm cautious of such an initiative, because I consider the motives of some suspect. <<<


But now we will have a religious year. An anniversary. Perhaps it's the time to try such thing again. Concord is always beneficial - who would be better to be worshipped in the anniversary than Dea Concordia? In all aspects of NR we suffer the lack of concord: in the religion, the Senate, between the magistrates, the citizens and the old founding members and new members.

If your suspect is from the same thing when C. Iulius Scaurus was trying to suspend public business of NR last year with his initiative of establishing some nefas days: - well, my suggestion has nothing to do with his. I speak of a year focused on Dea Concordia: it means worship and sacrifices and nothing more.

Do you doubt my motives? If you explain what your suspicion is exactly, I will try clean up things and will try to convince you.


Vale!




---------------------------------

---------------------------------
L'email della prossima generazione? Puoi averla con la nuova Yahoo! Mail

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53493 From: David Kling (Modianus) Date: 2007-12-12
Subject: Re: The Year of Concordia - The Tenth Anniversary of Nova Roma
Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus Gnaeo Cornelio Lentulo salutem dicit

I do not doubt your motives. I believe you to be sincere. However,
some of us -- myself included -- have "battle scars" from all the
battles in the Collegium Pontificum, Senate, etc... This being the
case I have a difficult time trusting the motivations of others, and
this was a reason I opposed the move that Scaurus tried last year.

As censor I've seen people leave Nova Roma because of the
dysfunctional aspects of Nova Roma. I believe some people would use
this dedication to Concordia as a smoke screen for either inactivity
or to conduct further mayhem.

I encourage you to apply for sacerdos, I will certainly support you!

Vale:

Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus

On Dec 12, 2007 11:03 AM, Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus
<cn_corn_lent@...> wrote:
>
> Do you doubt my motives? If you explain what your suspicion is exactly, I
> will try clean up things and will try to convince you.
>
>
> Vale!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 53494 From: Lucius Quirinus Date: 2007-12-12
Subject: Re: a.s. II diem Natalem Christi/Jesus never Existed
Salvete Omnes

there is no ancient text of any known contemporary
historician telling anything about a certain Jesus
Christ(nb: Christ is NOT a Family Name; it merely
means "Messiah"...)...about the fact that he "walked
on water", "multiplied fishes" and was finally
"Crucified"(n.b. the Roman way used to crucify
criminals did NOT make use of any "Cross" and
"Nails").....and the like.

The ONLY (contraddictory)tales we know about Jesus
Messiah are through the "Evangelists" whose complete
names and deeds in life are totally unknown.

If anybody can tell me the name of a known
hystorician(Plinus,etc.)telling anything about Jesus Christ/Messiah' Life and deeds please let me
know.

Thanks in advance.

That's why the most reasonable conclusion is that
Jesus Never Exsisted; it is just a tale, like
Cinderella.

VALETE OPTIME
LVCIVS Q. VESTA


--- phoenixfyre17 <phoenixfyre17@...> ha
scritto:

> Salve Nabarz,
>
> I know in some Italian and Italian-American
> families, the Epiphany
> is celebrated as the day when Befana (a kind old
> witch) delivers
> gifts to children while flying around on her broom.
>
> An older Italian version of the modern Santa Claus,
> if you will.
>
> Vale optime,
> Nero
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Nabarz"
> <nabarz@...> wrote:
> >
> >
> > >
> > > It just so happens that in this particular
> instance, it seems
> that at
> > > least one Christian writer (Iulius Africanus)
> had already
> calculated a
> > > date for the celebration of the birth of Christ
> as 25 December -
> for
> > > whatever reason - before any other "solar deity"
> had made his
> imprint.
> > >
> > Salve Cato,
> >
> > Putting the Armenian Church aside who celebrates
> Christmas on 6th
> > ofJanuary still.
> >
> > Just to be clear, according Iulius Africanus
> Christ was conceived
> (25
> > March) i.e. shortly after Spring Equinox (21st
> March) and was born
> > (25Dec) shortly after Winter Solstice (21
> December).
> >
> > Perfect, now that is called an accurate Solar god
> ;-)
> >
> > Christ as a light of world, is conceived at the
> balance of
> light/dark,
> > and born at time of darkness, bringing light to
> world. Sounds good
> to me.
> >
> > The winter solstice and return of light has been
> marked and
> celebrated
> > for a very long time before Christ, for physical
> evidence e.g look
> at
> > sites like Stonehenge.
> >
> > Anyway have a great Christmas, Winter Solstice,
> Yule, Shabe Yalda,
> > Alban Arthuran etc...
> >
> > I guess the point is many people from different
> cultures and
> religions
> > celebrate return and birth of light, the label we
> give it is
> secondary
> > imho.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Nabarz



___________________________________
L'email della prossima generazione? Puoi averla con la Nuova Yahoo! Mail: http://it.docs.yahoo.com/nowyoucan.html