Group: Nova-Roma |
Message: 56436 |
From: marcushoratius |
Date: 2008-05-01 |
Subject: KALENDAE MAIAE |
|
Group: Nova-Roma |
Message: 56437 |
From: Stephen Gallagher |
Date: 2008-05-01 |
Subject: Re: Ager Publicus - Its Use, Disuse, and Future |
|
Group: Nova-Roma |
Message: 56438 |
From: Cn. Cornelius Lentulus |
Date: 2008-05-01 |
Subject: The Sacred Year of Concordia - The Tenth Anniversay of Nova Roma (Ri |
|
Group: Nova-Roma |
Message: 56439 |
From: Gnaeus Caelius |
Date: 2008-05-01 |
Subject: Re: Ager Publicus - Its Use, Disuse, and Future |
|
Group: Nova-Roma |
Message: 56440 |
From: David Kling (Modianus) |
Date: 2008-05-01 |
Subject: Re: Ager Publicus - Its Use, Disuse, and Future |
|
Group: Nova-Roma |
Message: 56441 |
From: Gnaeus Caelius |
Date: 2008-05-01 |
Subject: Re: Ager Publicus - Its Use, Disuse, and Future |
|
Group: Nova-Roma |
Message: 56442 |
From: David Kling (Modianus) |
Date: 2008-05-01 |
Subject: Re: Ager Publicus - Its Use, Disuse, and Future |
|
Group: Nova-Roma |
Message: 56443 |
From: Maior |
Date: 2008-05-01 |
Subject: Re: Ager Publicus - Its Use, Disuse, and Future |
|
Group: Nova-Roma |
Message: 56444 |
From: Gnaeus Caelius |
Date: 2008-05-01 |
Subject: Re: Ager Publicus - Its Use, Disuse, and Future |
|
Group: Nova-Roma |
Message: 56445 |
From: Gnaeus Caelius |
Date: 2008-05-01 |
Subject: Re: Ager Publicus - Its Use, Disuse, and Future |
|
Group: Nova-Roma |
Message: 56446 |
From: marcushoratius |
Date: 2008-05-02 |
Subject: a. d. VI Nonas Maias: Floralia |
|
Group: Nova-Roma |
Message: 56447 |
From: Bruno Cantermi |
Date: 2008-05-02 |
Subject: Re: a. d. VI Nonas Maias: Floralia |
|
Group: Nova-Roma |
Message: 56448 |
From: Maior |
Date: 2008-05-02 |
Subject: Re: Ager Publicus - Its Use, Disuse, and Future |
|
Group: Nova-Roma |
Message: 56449 |
From: vallenporter |
Date: 2008-05-03 |
Subject: Re: Ager Publicus - Its Use, Disuse, and Future |
|
Group: Nova-Roma |
Message: 56450 |
From: marcushoratius |
Date: 2008-05-03 |
Subject: a. d. V Nonas Maias: Novensiles |
|
Group: Nova-Roma |
Message: 56451 |
From: marcushoratius |
Date: 2008-05-03 |
Subject: Re: a. d. VI Nonas Maias: Floralia |
|
Group: Nova-Roma |
Message: 56452 |
From: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com |
Date: 2008-05-03 |
Subject: Lord Apollo, 5/3/2008, 12:00 pm |
|
Group: Nova-Roma |
Message: 56453 |
From: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com |
Date: 2008-05-03 |
Subject: A group dedicated to new or prospective citizens, 5/3/2008, 12:00 pm |
|
Group: Nova-Roma |
Message: 56454 |
From: Bruno Cantermi |
Date: 2008-05-03 |
Subject: Re: a. d. VI Nonas Maias: Floralia |
|
Group: Nova-Roma |
Message: 56455 |
From: Gnaeus Caelius |
Date: 2008-05-03 |
Subject: Re: Ager Publicus - Its Use, Disuse, and Future |
|
Group: Nova-Roma |
Message: 56456 |
From: Gnaeus Caelius |
Date: 2008-05-03 |
Subject: Re: Ager Publicus - Its Use, Disuse, and Future |
|
Group: Nova-Roma |
Message: 56457 |
From: philippe cardon |
Date: 2008-05-03 |
Subject: NEW CITIZEN |
|
Group: Nova-Roma |
Message: 56458 |
From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus |
Date: 2008-05-03 |
Subject: Re: NEW CITIZEN |
|
Group: Nova-Roma |
Message: 56459 |
From: Maior |
Date: 2008-05-03 |
Subject: Re: NEW CITIZEN |
|
Group: Nova-Roma |
Message: 56460 |
From: marcushoratius |
Date: 2008-05-04 |
Subject: a. d. IV Nonas Maias: Theater of Macellus |
|
Group: Nova-Roma |
Message: 56461 |
From: vallenporter |
Date: 2008-05-04 |
Subject: Re: NEW CITIZEN |
|
Group: Nova-Roma |
Message: 56462 |
From: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com |
Date: 2008-05-04 |
Subject: File - EDICTUM DE SERMONE |
|
Group: Nova-Roma |
Message: 56463 |
From: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com |
Date: 2008-05-04 |
Subject: File - language.txt |
|
Group: Nova-Roma |
Message: 56464 |
From: Maior |
Date: 2008-05-04 |
Subject: Re: NEW CITIZEN |
|
Group: Nova-Roma |
Message: 56465 |
From: marcushoratius |
Date: 2008-05-05 |
Subject: a. d. III Nonas Maias: Senator's shoes |
|
Group: Nova-Roma |
Message: 56466 |
From: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com |
Date: 2008-05-05 |
Subject: Your citizen photo, 5/5/2008, 12:00 pm |
|
Group: Nova-Roma |
Message: 56467 |
From: philippe cardon |
Date: 2008-05-05 |
Subject: Re: NEW CITIZEN |
|
Group: Nova-Roma |
Message: 56468 |
From: t_octavius_salvius |
Date: 2008-05-05 |
Subject: A Return |
|
Group: Nova-Roma |
Message: 56469 |
From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus |
Date: 2008-05-05 |
Subject: Re: A Return |
|
Group: Nova-Roma |
Message: 56470 |
From: Nabarz |
Date: 2008-05-05 |
Subject: London Mithraeum |
|
Group: Nova-Roma |
Message: 56471 |
From: Maior |
Date: 2008-05-05 |
Subject: Re: NEW CITIZEN |
|
Group: Nova-Roma |
Message: 56472 |
From: philippe cardon |
Date: 2008-05-06 |
Subject: Re: NEW CITIZEN |
|
Group: Nova-Roma |
Message: 56473 |
From: marcushoratius |
Date: 2008-05-06 |
Subject: Pridie Nonar Maiae: Ver Sacrum |
|
Group: Nova-Roma |
Message: 56474 |
From: vallenporter |
Date: 2008-05-06 |
Subject: Re: NEW CITIZEN |
|
Group: Nova-Roma |
Message: 56475 |
From: Maior |
Date: 2008-05-06 |
Subject: Re: NEW CITIZEN |
|
Group: Nova-Roma |
Message: 56476 |
From: Maior |
Date: 2008-05-06 |
Subject: Re: NEW CITIZEN |
|
Group: Nova-Roma |
Message: 56477 |
From: philippe cardon |
Date: 2008-05-07 |
Subject: Re: NEW CITIZEN |
|
Group: Nova-Roma |
Message: 56478 |
From: marcushoratius |
Date: 2008-05-07 |
Subject: NONAE MAIAE: Mola Salsa |
|
Group: Nova-Roma |
Message: 56479 |
From: Gnaeus Caelius Ahenobarbus |
Date: 2008-05-07 |
Subject: Chat on Market Day, starting now! |
|
Group: Nova-Roma |
Message: 56480 |
From: marcushoratius |
Date: 2008-05-08 |
Subject: a. d. VIII Eidus Maiae: Temple of Mens |
|
Group: Nova-Roma |
Message: 56481 |
From: marcushoratius |
Date: 2008-05-09 |
Subject: a . d. VII Eidus Maiae: LEMURIA |
|
Group: Nova-Roma |
Message: 56482 |
From: April Spratley |
Date: 2008-05-09 |
Subject: New Citizen (Hermes/Mercurius) |
|
Group: Nova-Roma |
Message: 56483 |
From: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com |
Date: 2008-05-10 |
Subject: Roman calendar, 5/10/2008, 12:00 pm |
|
Group: Nova-Roma |
Message: 56484 |
From: marcushoratius |
Date: 2008-05-10 |
Subject: a. d. VI Eidus Maiae: Rosalia |
|
Group: Nova-Roma |
Message: 56485 |
From: marcushoratius |
Date: 2008-05-11 |
Subject: a. d. V Eidus Maiae: LEMURIA |
|
Group: Nova-Roma |
Message: 56486 |
From: ajackaln |
Date: 2008-05-12 |
Subject: A group about MYSTERIOUS PERSIAN EMPIRE!!! |
|
Group: Nova-Roma |
Message: 56487 |
From: Thomas Vogel |
Date: 2008-05-12 |
Subject: Thomas Vogel is out of the office. |
|
Group: Nova-Roma |
Message: 56488 |
From: marcushoratius |
Date: 2008-05-12 |
Subject: a. d. IV Eidus Maiae: Ludi Marti |
|
Group: Nova-Roma |
Message: 56489 |
From: Annia Minucia Marcella |
Date: 2008-05-12 |
Subject: Re: Thomas Vogel is out of the office. |
|
Group: Nova-Roma |
Message: 56490 |
From: marcushoratius |
Date: 2008-05-12 |
Subject: a. d. III Eidus Maiae: LEMURIA |
|
Group: Nova-Roma |
Message: 56491 |
From: A. Tullia Scholastica |
Date: 2008-05-14 |
Subject: New archaeological finds: bust of Caesar, etc. |
|
Group: Nova-Roma |
Message: 56492 |
From: Kristoffer From |
Date: 2008-05-14 |
Subject: Re: Thomas Vogel is out of the office. |
|
Group: Nova-Roma |
Message: 56493 |
From: marcushoratius |
Date: 2008-05-14 |
Subject: Pridie Eidus Maiae: sacra Argeorum |
|
Group: Nova-Roma |
Message: 56494 |
From: Adriano Rota |
Date: 2008-05-14 |
Subject: Re: New archaeological finds: bust of Caesar, etc. |
|
Group: Nova-Roma |
Message: 56495 |
From: Publius Memmius Albucius |
Date: 2008-05-14 |
Subject: Re: Bust of Caesar found in Rhone river |
|
Group: Nova-Roma |
Message: 56496 |
From: Annia Minucia Marcella |
Date: 2008-05-14 |
Subject: Re: Thomas Vogel is out of the office. |
|
Group: Nova-Roma |
Message: 56497 |
From: A. Apollonius Cordus |
Date: 2008-05-14 |
Subject: Re: Confarreatio and other forms of marriage |
|
Group: Nova-Roma |
Message: 56498 |
From: A. Apollonius Cordus |
Date: 2008-05-14 |
Subject: Re: Confarreatio and other forms of marriage |
|
Group: Nova-Roma |
Message: 56499 |
From: Cn. Cornelius Lentulus |
Date: 2008-05-15 |
Subject: Re: Thomas Vogel is out of the office. |
|
Group: Nova-Roma |
Message: 56500 |
From: marcushoratius |
Date: 2008-05-15 |
Subject: EIDUS MAESIAE: Mecurialia |
|
Group: Nova-Roma |
Message: 56501 |
From: Cn. Cornelius Lentulus |
Date: 2008-05-15 |
Subject: Concordia Sacrifice in The Year of the 10th Anniversary and the 11th |
|
Group: Nova-Roma |
Message: 56502 |
From: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com |
Date: 2008-05-15 |
Subject: To all in the Far East, 5/15/2008, 12:00 pm |
|
Group: Nova-Roma |
Message: 56503 |
From: Titus Iulius Sabinus |
Date: 2008-05-15 |
Subject: Mercuralia - Visit the Temple of Mercurius. |
|
Group: Nova-Roma |
Message: 56504 |
From: marcushoratius |
Date: 2008-05-16 |
Subject: a. d. XVII Kalendas Iunonis: Portents and Perfume |
|
Group: Nova-Roma |
Message: 56505 |
From: albmd323232 |
Date: 2008-05-16 |
Subject: Wikipedia featured article |
|
Group: Nova-Roma |
Message: 56506 |
From: marcushoratius |
Date: 2008-05-17 |
Subject: a. d. XVI Kalendas Iunonis: Aemilius and the Spoils of Macedonia |
|
Group: Nova-Roma |
Message: 56507 |
From: Cn. Cornelius Lentulus |
Date: 2008-05-17 |
Subject: News - Exciting Events in Pannonia |
|
Group: Nova-Roma |
Message: 56508 |
From: Lucia Livia Plauta |
Date: 2008-05-17 |
Subject: Re: News - Exciting Events in Pannonia |
|
Group: Nova-Roma |
Message: 56509 |
From: marcushoratius |
Date: 2008-05-18 |
Subject: a. d. XV Kal. Iun.: Death of Brutus |
|
Group: Nova-Roma |
Message: 56510 |
From: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com |
Date: 2008-05-18 |
Subject: File - EDICTUM DE SERMONE |
|
Group: Nova-Roma |
Message: 56511 |
From: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com |
Date: 2008-05-18 |
Subject: File - language.txt |
|
Group: Nova-Roma |
Message: 56512 |
From: marcushoratius |
Date: 2008-05-19 |
Subject: a. .d XIV Kal. Iun.: Valerius Poplicola: Beginning of the Republic |
|
Group: Nova-Roma |
Message: 56513 |
From: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com |
Date: 2008-05-19 |
Subject: Citizens! Keep your e-mail information up to date!, 5/19/2008, 12:00 |
|
Group: Nova-Roma |
Message: 56514 |
From: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com |
Date: 2008-05-19 |
Subject: Reminder to citizen/authors, 5/19/2008, 12:00 pm |
|
Group: Nova-Roma |
Message: 56515 |
From: ajackaln |
Date: 2008-05-20 |
Subject: A group about MYSTERIOUS PERSIAN EMPIRE!!! |
|
Group: Nova-Roma |
Message: 56516 |
From: marcushoratius |
Date: 2008-05-20 |
Subject: a. d. XIII Kalendas Iunias: Vetruvius on the Placement of Temples |
|
Group: Nova-Roma |
Message: 56517 |
From: Cn. Cornelius Lentulus |
Date: 2008-05-20 |
Subject: Biggest Public Nova Roman Sacrifice Ever |
|
Group: Nova-Roma |
Message: 56518 |
From: marcushoratius |
Date: 2008-05-21 |
Subject: a. d. XII Kalendas Iunias: AGONALIA |
|
Group: Nova-Roma |
Message: 56519 |
From: Publius Memmius Albucius |
Date: 2008-05-21 |
Subject: Re: Biggest Public Nova Roman Sacrifice Ever |
|
Group: Nova-Roma |
Message: 56520 |
From: Marcus Iulius Perusianus |
Date: 2008-05-22 |
Subject: Signa Romanorum, a new category of monuments: walls, castra and vall |
|
Group: Nova-Roma |
Message: 56521 |
From: marcushoratius |
Date: 2008-05-22 |
Subject: a. d. XI Kalendas Iunonias: Death of Constantinus |
|
Group: Nova-Roma |
Message: 56522 |
From: Lucia Livia Plauta |
Date: 2008-05-22 |
Subject: Senate called to order |
|
Group: Nova-Roma |
Message: 56523 |
From: Lucia Livia Plauta |
Date: 2008-05-22 |
Subject: Senate called to order (corrected) |
|
Group: Nova-Roma |
Message: 56524 |
From: Lucia Livia Plauta |
Date: 2008-05-22 |
Subject: Nova Roma conventus in Dacia - the deadline for reservations is near |
|
Group: Nova-Roma |
Message: 56525 |
From: Titus Iulius Sabinus |
Date: 2008-05-22 |
Subject: Re: Nova Roma conventus in Dacia + Novae in Moesia! |
|
Group: Nova-Roma |
Message: 56526 |
From: marcushoratius |
Date: 2008-05-23 |
Subject: a. d. X Kalendas Iunias: TUBILUSTRUM; feriae Volcano, dies Rosarium |
|
Group: Nova-Roma |
Message: 56527 |
From: QFabiusMaxmi@aol.com |
Date: 2008-05-23 |
Subject: Roman Forum of 179 AD diorama. Impressive |
|
Group: Nova-Roma |
Message: 56528 |
From: Lucia Livia Plauta |
Date: 2008-05-23 |
Subject: Re: Roman Forum of 179 AD diorama. Impressive |
|
Group: Nova-Roma |
Message: 56529 |
From: Lucia Livia Plauta |
Date: 2008-05-23 |
Subject: Photos of the Feriae Latinae ceremony. |
|
Group: Nova-Roma |
Message: 56530 |
From: Titus Iulius Sabinus |
Date: 2008-05-23 |
Subject: Re: Roman Forum of 179 AD diorama. Impressive |
|
Group: Nova-Roma |
Message: 56531 |
From: iulius sabinus |
Date: 2008-05-23 |
Subject: Re: Photos of the Feriae Latinae ceremony. |
|
Group: Nova-Roma |
Message: 56532 |
From: marcushoratius |
Date: 2008-05-24 |
Subject: a. d. IX Kalendas Iunias: Q. R. C. F. |
|
Group: Nova-Roma |
Message: 56533 |
From: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com |
Date: 2008-05-24 |
Subject: Official group for the Religio Romana, 5/24/2008, 12:00 pm |
|
Group: Nova-Roma |
Message: 56534 |
From: Lucia Livia Plauta |
Date: 2008-05-24 |
Subject: Re: Photos of the Feriae Latinae ceremony. |
|
Group: Nova-Roma |
Message: 56535 |
From: marcushoratius |
Date: 2008-05-25 |
Subject: a. d. VIII Kalendas Junonias: Fortunae Primigeniae |
|
Group: Nova-Roma |
Message: 56536 |
From: Caeso Fabius Buteo Quintilianus |
Date: 2008-05-25 |
Subject: Lack of time at the moment |
|
Group: Nova-Roma |
Message: 56537 |
From: Maior |
Date: 2008-05-25 |
Subject: OT: easy linux - ubuntu |
|
Group: Nova-Roma |
Message: 56538 |
From: marcushoratius |
Date: 2008-05-26 |
Subject: a. d. VII Kalendas Iunoias |
|
Group: Nova-Roma |
Message: 56539 |
From: M. CVRIATIVS COMPLVTENSIS |
Date: 2008-05-26 |
Subject: MENSAJE PARA Octavio Asidus Abderitanus o Paco BenÃtez Aguilar |
|
Group: Nova-Roma |
Message: 56540 |
From: marcushoratius |
Date: 2008-05-26 |
Subject: a. d. VI Kalendas Iunias: Di Penates; Banquet of the Fratres Arvales |
|
Group: Nova-Roma |
Message: 56541 |
From: L. Vitellius Triarius |
Date: 2008-05-27 |
Subject: ENROLL NOW FOR LUDI MATUTINI :: JUN 9-11 |
|
Group: Nova-Roma |
Message: 56542 |
From: Tom Ross |
Date: 2008-05-27 |
Subject: Castra Aestiva III Tillsonburg, Ontario, Canada |
|
Group: Nova-Roma |
Message: 56543 |
From: Euphemia Cassia Mercuria |
Date: 2008-05-27 |
Subject: Re: Photos of the Feriae Latinae ceremony. |
|
Group: Nova-Roma |
Message: 56544 |
From: Maior |
Date: 2008-05-27 |
Subject: Re: Biggest Public Nova Roman Sacrifice Ever |
|
Group: Nova-Roma |
Message: 56545 |
From: Maior |
Date: 2008-05-27 |
Subject: Re: Photos of the Feriae Latinae ceremony. |
|
Group: Nova-Roma |
Message: 56546 |
From: marcushoratius |
Date: 2008-05-28 |
Subject: a. d. V Kalendas Iunias: Sacred Grove of the Dea Dia |
|
Group: Nova-Roma |
Message: 56547 |
From: Cn. Cornelius Lentulus |
Date: 2008-05-28 |
Subject: Photos of the Latest Pannonian Event and the Biggest NR Sacrifice Ev |
|
Group: Nova-Roma |
Message: 56548 |
From: Lucia Livia Plauta |
Date: 2008-05-28 |
Subject: Re: Photos of the Feriae Latinae ceremony. |
|
Group: Nova-Roma |
Message: 56549 |
From: iulius sabinus |
Date: 2008-05-28 |
Subject: Re: Photos of the Latest Pannonian Event and the Biggest NR Sacrific |
|
Group: Nova-Roma |
Message: 56550 |
From: pompeia_minucia_tiberia |
Date: 2008-05-28 |
Subject: Re: Photos of the Feriae Latinae ceremony. |
|
Group: Nova-Roma |
Message: 56551 |
From: pompeia_minucia_tiberia |
Date: 2008-05-28 |
Subject: Re: Never Mind :>)Photos of the Feriae Latinae ceremony. |
|
Group: Nova-Roma |
Message: 56552 |
From: Maior |
Date: 2008-05-29 |
Subject: Re: Never Mind :>)Photos of the Feriae Latinae ceremony. |
|
Group: Nova-Roma |
Message: 56553 |
From: marcushoratius |
Date: 2008-05-29 |
Subject: a. d. IV Kalendas Iunias: Sacra Deae Diae |
|
Group: Nova-Roma |
Message: 56554 |
From: marcushoratius |
Date: 2008-05-29 |
Subject: a. d. III Kalendas Iunias: Ludi Tarentini |
|
Group: Nova-Roma |
Message: 56555 |
From: Cn. Cornelius Lentulus |
Date: 2008-05-30 |
Subject: Edictum XI. Legati Pro Praetore Pannoniae Cn. Corneli Lentuli - abou |
|
Group: Nova-Roma |
Message: 56556 |
From: QFabiusMaxmi@aol.com |
Date: 2008-05-30 |
Subject: ANCIENT CIRCUS AREA DISCOVERED NEAR MILAS, TURKEY |
|
Group: Nova-Roma |
Message: 56557 |
From: Sebastian José Molina Palacios |
Date: 2008-05-30 |
Subject: Re: Edictum XI. Legati Pro Praetore Pannoniae Cn. Corneli Lentuli - |
|
Group: Nova-Roma |
Message: 56558 |
From: Bruno Cantermi |
Date: 2008-05-30 |
Subject: To the Censores |
|
Group: Nova-Roma |
Message: 56559 |
From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus |
Date: 2008-05-30 |
Subject: Re: To the Censores |
|
Group: Nova-Roma |
Message: 56560 |
From: marcushoratius |
Date: 2008-05-31 |
Subject: Pridie Kalendas Iunias: Rosalia |
|
Group: Nova-Roma |
Message: 56561 |
From: Cn. Cornelius Lentulus |
Date: 2008-05-31 |
Subject: Re: Edictum XI. Legati Pro Praetore Pannoniae Cn. Corneli Lentuli - |
|
Group: Nova-Roma |
Message: 56562 |
From: David Kling (Modianus) |
Date: 2008-05-31 |
Subject: Re: To the Censores |
|
Group: Nova-Roma |
Message: 56563 |
From: Titus Iulius Sabinus |
Date: 2008-05-31 |
Subject: Re: Edictum XI. Legati Pro Praetore Pannoniae Cn. Corneli Lentuli - |
|
Group: Nova-Roma |
Message: 56564 |
From: Titus Iulius Sabinus |
Date: 2008-05-31 |
Subject: VI Convetus Novae Romae. |
|
Group: Nova-Roma |
Message: 56565 |
From: Cn. Cornelius Lentulus |
Date: 2008-05-31 |
Subject: R: [Nova-Roma] Re: Edictum XI. Legati Pro Praetore Pannoniae Cn. Cor |
|
Group: Nova-Roma |
Message: 56566 |
From: M•IVL•SEVERVS |
Date: 2008-05-31 |
Subject: BOLDOG SZÜLETÉSNAPOT, LENTVLVS! |
|
Group: Nova-Roma |
Message: 56567 |
From: Ugo Coppola |
Date: 2008-05-31 |
Subject: Re: VI Convetus Novae Romae. |
|
Group: Nova-Roma |
Message: 56568 |
From: Titus Iulius Sabinus |
Date: 2008-05-31 |
Subject: Re: VI Convetus Novae Romae. |
|
Group: Nova-Roma |
Message: 56569 |
From: Ugo Coppola |
Date: 2008-05-31 |
Subject: Re: VI Convetus Novae Romae. |
|
Group: Nova-Roma |
Message: 56570 |
From: iulius sabinus |
Date: 2008-05-31 |
Subject: Re: VI Convetus Novae Romae. |
|
Group: Nova-Roma |
Message: 56571 |
From: A. Tullia Scholastica |
Date: 2008-05-31 |
Subject: Re: R: [Nova-Roma] Re: Edictum XI. Legati Pro Praetore Pannoniae Cn. |
|
Group: Nova-Roma |
Message: 56572 |
From: Cn. Cornelius Lentulus |
Date: 2008-05-31 |
Subject: R: [Nova-Roma] BOLDOG SZÜLETÉSNAPOT, LENTVLVS! |
|
Group: Nova-Roma |
Message: 56573 |
From: Cn. Cornelius Lentulus |
Date: 2008-05-31 |
Subject: Re: R: [Nova-Roma] Re: Edictum XI. Legati Pro Praetore Pannoniae Cn. |
|
Group: Nova-Roma |
Message: 56574 |
From: Titus Iulius Sabinus |
Date: 2008-05-31 |
Subject: R: [Nova-Roma] Re: Edictum XI. Legati Pro Praetore Pannoniae Cn. Cor |
|
Group: Nova-Roma |
Message: 56575 |
From: Maior |
Date: 2008-05-31 |
Subject: R: [Nova-Roma] Re: Edictum XI. Legati Pro Praetore Pannoniae Cn. Cor |
|
Group: Nova-Roma |
Message: 56576 |
From: A. Tullia Scholastica |
Date: 2008-05-31 |
Subject: Re: R: [Nova-Roma] Re: Edictum XI. Legati Pro Praetore Pannoniae Cn. |
|
M. Moravius Piscinus cultores Deorum, Quiritibus et omnibus salutem
plurimam dicit: Di Deaeque vos ament.
Hodie est ante diem III Eidus Maiae; haec dies nefastus est: LEMURIA;
Rosaria; Fidis mane oritur, significat tempestatem.
At the very core of the religio Romana is the family devotion for the
Lares. In the Lemuria we see yet another aspect of the Romans'
implicit belief in an afterlife. In practice the dead were regarded
in some way to remain close to their tombs. Food and drink were
offered to them in a way that desired that they continue to live on.
Such practices can be found in Latium centuries before Rome was
founded. At Gabii, for example, among graves dating between 1000-900
BCE there are remains of deer and goats suggesting that a portion of
a meal was offered to the dead. But then what did the Romans believe
about the afterlife? One example comes from a funerary dedication.
"Whole-heartedly I pray to you, most holy Manes, may you admit my
dear husband among you, and, may you want to be most indulging in
this, that in the hours of the night I may see him and also be
advised by him on what to do, in order that I may be able to swiftly
and sweetly come stand by his side." ~ Corpus Inscriptiones Latinae
6.18817
There are a couple of ideas here of interest. It is assumed that the
deceased must be accepted among his Lares, or in other words that he
shall be judged. The wife, too, looks towards being judged herself
some day. That poses the question on what might happen to those who
were not accepted among the holy Manes, or one's family Lares? The
other important idea here is that the deceased can communicate with
the living, guiding us, advising us, and helping in various ways.
What is interesting here is that the wife seeks guidance on how to
attain her own redemption among the Lares.
"Now if virtue is rewarded among the Manes, within the changeable
shadows, then I pray that the Mother may give honor and gratitude to
you." ~ Anthologia Latina II 1147.2
Certain philosophical schools, most notably the Epicurians, fostered
a skeptical view towards an afterlife. Among Romans there are some,
but very rare expressions of this skepticism. Among tens of
thousands of funerary inscriptions attesting to belief in an
afterlife you will find one that says, "When life ends, all things
perish and turn to nothing (Carmina Latina Epigraphica I 1895, no.
420)." When it is voiced, the skepticism is often coupled with a
notion that a memory of the person would live on within his family
cultus.
"If there is a dwelling place for the Manes; if, as the wise believe,
noble souls do not perish with the body, rest thou in peaceÂ… Over
many indeed, of those who have gone before, as over the ignoble and
inglorious, the waves of oblivion shall roll; Agricola, known to
posterity through history and tradition, will live forever." ~ P.
Cornelius Tacitus, Agricola 46
"The Dream of Scipio," written by Cicero, takes this idea further in
that Scipio Africanus is portrayed as have climbed to a heavenly
home, one reserved for heroes. Ovid likewise speaks of the heavenly
homes of heroes along a celestial Via Sacra:
"There is a high track, seen when the sky is clear, called the Milky
Way, and known for its brightness. This way the Gods above pass to
the palaces and halls of the mighty Thunderer. To right and left are
the houses of the noble gods, doors open and crowded. The lesser gods
live elsewhere. Here the powerful and distinguished have made their
home. This is the place, if I were to be bold, I would not be afraid
to call high Heaven's Palatine." ~ Metamorphoses 1.168-176
No less than the elite, the classes below also sought their places in
the heavens. This is seen most often in funerary iconography that
depicts the deceased in the form of a God or Goddess. We see this
more often in later imperial eras that commonly Romans sought to
become deities; i. e. Lares. Occasionally this is also brought out in
funerary inscriptions as well.
"Mother Earth, indeed to You I pray, settle lightly on these bones,
as she knew that piety is the reward of she who merits it, and
whoever sincerely stands out in performing her own pious duties may
be carried on that happy path to the Gods above." ~ Corpus
Inscriptiones Latinae 6.9204
If not along the celestial Via Sacra, then other places for the
worthy to live were thought to be in the hemispheres, represented by
the Dioscuri, or in the sublunar atmosphere under the care of Diana,
or else on the moon. But what is most often depicted in funerary art
are the Blessed Isles beyond the Western Seas. The souls of the dead
were depicted as small children, at times with butterfly wings.
Cupid carrying Psyche is a common enough representation of the soul's
travel to the Blessed Isles, for there was where the dead would live
in the Garden of Venus. In other representations the deceased is
seen in carriages or on ships with Cupids and Nereids and a host of
creatures from the realm of Neptunus. The Blessed Isles themselves
are portrayed with the dead as putti engaged in idyllic labors –
harvesting grapes, making wine, carrying bee's nests, and so on. The
dead are thus portrayed as children of Venus, who for the Romans is
Venus Genetrix. Thus the journey to the Blessed Isles is a journey
home to what is described as a perpetual springtime.
"Grant, O Gods, that the earth may lie soft and gently upon the
shades of our ancestors, and may their urns be filled with a
perpetual springtime blooming with the sweet scents of crocus." ~
Persius, Satires 7.207-8 (see also Juvenal, Satires 7.207-8)
Another school of thought, originating from Orphism,t is expressed in
Plato by the Myth of Er in the Republic. In Roman literature it first
appears with Virgil. In Book VI of the Aeneid the Underworld is
divided into three parts. Just inside the portals to Hades is a
Limbo in which infants and others who had died before their time
reside. A lower region is one of punishment, where Tartarus is the
lowest region and reserved to torment criminals of legend. Third are
the Elysian Fields. In the Myth of Er one is first judged and must be
purged of any sins before being reincarnated. With Vergil, Aeneas
finds his father in the Elysian Fields where some cavort in pleasure,
but others await their turn to leave.
What yonder rivers be; what people press,
Line after line, on those dim shores along.
Said Sire Anchises: "Yonder thronging souls
To reincarnate shape predestined move.
Here, at the river Lethe's wave, they quaff
Care-quelling floods, and long oblivion.
~ P. Vergilius Maro, Aeneid 6.715-722
While most funerary art expressed a hope in journeying to the Blessed
Isles or to some other paradise in the afterlife, everyone must
expect a reckoning of their deeds in life. Dis Pater and Proserpina
ruled over the realm wherein those who had to be chastised would
dwell until their punishments had purged them of their misdeeds.
"O Proserpina, may Your clemency remain merciful on the souls You
keep, and may You Dis Pater, Proserpina's consort, not desire to be
stern." ~ Propertius Eligiae 2.28c.1-2
In some instances it is expressed that an individual must stand trial
in Hades in order to determine his fate. An example is where
Propertius lists the virtues and good deeds of Cornelia, daughter of
Scribonia and deceased wife of L. Aemilius Paullus, censor in 22 BCE.
He concludes her defense:
"The case for my defense is done. Rise up my witnesses, who weep for
me, while kindly Earth requites my life's just deserts. Even heaven
has unbarred its gates to virtue. May I be found worthy that my
bones be borne to join my honored ancestors." ~ Propertius, Eligiae
6.11
The genius of a man, and the juno of a woman, was said to come in
part from one's sacred ancestors, and the other part from the Gods.
Ultimately one returned home, redeemed back among the Gods as a
lesser god. Deprived of proper rites, deprived of a family cultus,
one was not given an opportunity to state his or her case as to why
she or he was worthy to join with the Lares. This was the fate of
the Lemures, barred from crossing the River Styx and left to wander
until they might find someone to provide for them. For the most
part, however, Romans believed that by living a virtuous life,
performing the duties that fate had assigned to them, that they would
be rewarded in an afterlife of bliss among their family members in
the Garden of Venus, across the Western Seas, on the Blessed Isles.
Today's thought is from the Pythagorean sentences of Stobaeus 54.
"The ancient theologists and priests testify that the soul is
conjoined to the body through a certain punishment, and, that it is
buried in this body as in a sepulchre."
|
|
M. Moravius Piscinus cultoribus Deorum et omnibus salutem plurimam
dicit: Dei vos annuant oro.
Hodie est die pristine Eidus Maiae; haec dies comitialis est: sacra
Argeorum
"On this day too, the Vestals throw effigies made of rushes, in the
form of men of old, from the oak bridge." ~ Ovidius Naso, Fasti 5.621
"Why is it that in the month of May at the time of the full moon they
throw into the river from the Pons Sublicius figures of men, calling
the images thrown Argives? Is it because in ancient days the
barbarians wholived in these parts used to destroy thus the Greeks
whom they captured? But Hercules, who was much admired by them, put
an end to their murder of strangers and taught them to throw figures
into the river, in imitation of their superstitious custom, The men
of old used to call all Greeks Argives; unless it be, indeed, since
the Arcadians regarded the Argives also as their enemies because of
their immediate proximity, that, when Evander and his men fled Greece
and settled here, they continued to preserve their ancient feud and
enmity." ~ Plutarch, Roman Questions 32
On March 16 and 17 a procession was conducted throughout the City to
the various sacella of the Argei. Varro said that there were twenty-
seven sacella, of which he gives the location for several though not
all, divided among the four divisions of the Servian City( Lingua
Latinae 5.45-54). At each a puppet made of rushes was deposited.
Next, on 14 May these rush puppets were taken from their sacella and
brought to the Pons Sublicius from which they were thrown into the
Tiber, or otherwise submerged into the water. Present at this ritual
were magistrates, in particular the praetor urbanus, the pontifices,
Vestales Virgines, the flamenica Dialis, and a class of priests
called tutulati. Of the latter, Varro explains:
"The Argei are made of rushes, human figures twenty-seven in number;
each year these are thrown into the Tiber from the Pons Sublicius by
the sacerdotes, acting on behalf of the public. These priests are
called tutulati since at the sacrifice they are accustomed to have
something like a conical marker on their heads; this is called a
tutulus from the fact that the twisted locks of hair which the
matrons wear on the tops of their heads wrapped with a woolen band,
used to be called tutuli, whether named from the fact that this was
done for the purpose of protecting (tueri) the hair, or because that
which is the highest in the City, namely the Arx, was called
tutissimum (the safest)." ~ M. Terrentius Varro, Lingua Latinae 7.44
Different stories were told to explain this rite, projecting it back
into a time before Rome. In one story, Hercules teaches the
aboriginal people of the seven hills to use men made of rushes as
substitutes for human sacrifices. In another it was said that young
men use to throw old men from the bridge when passing over to vote in
comitia. The rite was then thought to have been made to placate the
murdered old men. There is very little evidence that human
sacrifices were practiced at Rome, and what there is comes from a
later period than the legends suggests. That is, Livy tells us of
two instances during the era of the Punic Wars where two couples in
each instance, one of Greeks and one of Etruscans, were sacrificed.
Also Carandini has discovered the remains of four individuals that
appear to have been sacrificed in a rite related to Remus at a time
when the poemerium was extended. The Romans themselves speculated
that such a use puppets as found with the argei, and also the oscilla
hung in trees at the feriae Latinae and the Paganalia, had been
substituted for an earlier practice of human sacrifice. There is no
evidence in any remains ever found at such places that such was true;
whereas the puppets would seem more likely to correspond to bronze
votives of human and animal forms as have been found in favissa on
the Capitoline Hill, in Sabine territories and elsewhere. Something
like the paintings found in Val Camonica, dating from the Bronze Age
and into the early Iron Age, the votives represent participants in
the rites rather than any sacrificial victims.
Another story told is that the Argei represent those Greek heroes who
travelled with Hercules to Italy and settled at Rome. When in old
age and nearing death they requested that they be returned by sea to
their native land, and thus the puppets represent sending their souls
down river, to the open sea, where they might be carried to their
fatherland. This story, too, is a later invention and lends no real
explanation for the ritual.
Working from such ideas Wissowa proposed that the rite was introduced
by the decemviri sacris faciundis in response to a pestilence that
occurred between the first and second Punic Wars. In his theory,
twenty-seven (or twenty-four, or thirty after Dionysius of
Halicarnassus) Greeks were taken to different stations in the City,
and held for a while before being sacrificed by drowning. Wissowa's
ideas have been refuted for the same reasons as disputes the Romans
own speculations, but also because the decemviri did not participate
in this rite, and no mention is made of the Sibylline Oracles in
relation to the Argei. Nevertheless there may be some merit to his
ideas on when this rite was introduced. It does not appear in any
calendar, and does not appear to have been one of the early state
rites. Thus it would seem to have originated sometime after the
fourth century, and the Greek elements in legends about the rite's
origin may suggest an introduction as late as the mid second
century.
The origin and purpose of the ritual is uncertain among our sources.
The presence of the Vestales along with the pontifices, and the fact
that a procession was conducted from the various sacalla to the Tiber
suggest that this was a purification ritual. Another feature is seen
with the flamenica Dialis.
"When she goes to the Argei, that she neither combs her head nor
dresses her hair." ~ Aulus Gellius, Noctes Atticae 10.15.30
In other words, she presents herself in public as though she is in
mourning. On two other occasions she is seen in the same manner;
when the Salii perform a purification of the City in March and when
the Vestales perform a purification of the Temple of Vesta in June.
There is another rite with something similar. The lapis manalis, a
large stone that sounded like thunder when rolled through Rome, was
brought from the Campus Martius to the Capitolium. This was a rite
of sympathetic magic to induce Jupiter to send rain. The rite of the
argei is a dramatic performance rather than a sacrifice. So it
shares in something common with the ritual where the lapis manalis is
brought out. Also in Ptolemaic Egyptwhere images of Adonis were
immersed in the Nile amid a weeping crowd in a ritual to secure the
flooding of the river and fertility of the land. Tacitus describes
how images of the Germanic Goddess Nerthus was immersed in rivers for
a similar reason (Germania 40). Other examples of such rites among
Teutonic, Slavonic, and Greek traditions are cited by W. W. Fowler as
parallels. Behind the legends, and some modern assumptions as well,
the ritual of immersing the rush puppets into the Tiber has features
that show it, too, is a rite involving sympathetic magic, a
purification of the City, in order to secure rain and fertility.
"The magic elements in the rite are clear: The straw puppets, made to
look like men, were as good as men themselves in a magic rite,
whether or not the rite originated in human sacrifice. Again, if the
straw represented the products of the earth, `the corn spirit,' as it
has been called, these puppets, when drenched in water, were
sufficient to cause the rain to fall, just as the lapis manalis, when
drenched with water, could cause the heavens to overflow. Further,
this view is strengthened by the prominent part taken in the rite by
the Vestals, who, in all their public religious duties, were
concerned with rites to produce fertility in crops and flocks and
who, as we know, were possessed of magic powers. The procession
itself involved purification – a magic rite itself – as was the case
with all Roman processions." ~ Eli Edward Burriss, The Classical
Journal, Vol. 24, No. 2 (Nov., 1928), pp. 112-123.
Today's thought is from Seneca, On Tranquility 10:
"We are all chained to Fortune. Some chains are golden and loose,
some are tight and made of base metal; but what difference does it
make? All of us are in custody, the binders and the bound – unless
you suppose the left end of the chain is lighter. Some are chained
by office, some by wealth; some are weighed down by high birth, some
by low; some are subject to another's tyranny, some to their own;
some ar confined to one spot by banishment, some by a priesthood.
All life is bondage. Man musttherefore habituate himselfto his
condition, complain of it as little as possible, and grasp whatever
good lies within his reach. No situation is so harsh that a
dispassionate mind cannot find some consolation in it."
|
|
M. Moravius Piscinus Horatianus Quiritibus cultoribus Deorum et
omnibus salutem plurimam dicit: Salvete, vosque bona Iuppiter auctet
ope.
Hodie est ante diem XII Kalendas Iunonias; haec dies nefastus est:
AGONALIA; Vediovi; Suculae exoriuntur, septentrionales venti,
nonnumquam Auster cum pluvia.
"The Pleiades rise in the morning with a northernly wind, or
sometimes a sourthernly wind brings rain." ~ Columella, De Re Rustica
9.2.43
Agonalia
"The dies Agonales, on which the Rex Sacrorum sacrifices a ram in the
Regia, were named 'agon' for this reason, because the Minister
Sacrificii asks, 'Agone?' (`Shall I do my work?) Unless it is from
the Greek, where agon means princeps (leader), from the fact that the
sacrificing is done by the leader of the State and the leader of the
flock is sacrificed." ~ M. Terrentius Varro, Lingua Latinae 6.12
Four days each year the Rex Sacrorum made this sacrifice in the
Regia, on 9 January, 17 March (Liberalia), 21 May, and 11 December.
The sacrifices were made respectively to Jupiter, Mars, Vediovis, and
to an unknown God is the last instance. The other days on which
sacrifices were offered to Vediovis were 1 January, making the
anniversary of His fanum on the Tiber Isle, and on the Nones of March
for the anniversary of His temple in the saddle between the Arx and
the Capitolium. In His temple on the Capitoline Hill, a statue
portrayed Vediovis as a youthful man that "holds arrows, which, as
everyone knows, are devised to inflict harm; for that reason it has
often been said that that God is Apollo; and a she-goat is sacrificed
to Him in the customary fashion, and a representation of that animal
stands near his statue (A. Gellius, Noctes Atticae 5.12.11-12)"
The identity of Vediovis with Apollo, based solely on His statue
holding arrows, is late and comes from Greek notions. We are told in
Livy how a shrine to Vediovis was on the Capitoline Hill prior to the
construction of the Capitolium in a period of Roman history before
the introduction of statuary depicting any of the Roman deities.
Additionally, when Apollo was introduced to Rome, He came in response
to a plague as Apollo Medicus and so remained on the Campus Martius
until the reign of Augustus Caesar. Alternately Vediovis was thought
to be a young Jupiter, the she-goat representing the goat that
suckled Jupiter while He was hidden from His father Saturnus. The
Capitoline Hill was originally named the Saturnine Hill. This
interpretation, too, is later and based in Greek myth. Such
explanations shed no light on Vediovis or on His cultus.
Ovid, Gellius, and later scholars have pointed to how His name is
composed by adding the prefix 've-' to a much earlier name for
Jupiter, Diovis. Elsewhere, where the prefix 've-' appears it
means 'diminutive' or 'evil,' the opposite of the meaning of the word
to which it is attached. Thus it is posed that Vediovis might be a
diminutive, i. e. younger version of Jupiter. Otherwise He might be
assumed to have been an evil aspect of Jupiter. But neither proposal
would explain Vediovis. He does seem to be an Underworld deity, and
to be distinct from Jupiter. For one thing, while a she-goat is
specifically said to be sacrificed to Him, the chief priest of
Jupiter, the flamen Dialis is forbidden "to touch, or even to name,
a she-goat" (A. Gellius, Noctes Atticae 10.15.12). It is unusal,
too, that a female sacrifice should be designated for a God. The
shrines of Vediovis lay outside the poemerium, those of Jupiter
inside. As with Apollo, the arrows that He holds could represent
disease, which was thought to come from the Underworld. Vediovis
appears as one of the deities of the Underworld, alongside and
distinct from Dis Pater, to which Scipio Africanus Aemilianus devotes
Carthage in 146 BCE (Macrobius, Saturnalia 3.9.10-11). Then of
course there is this festival, the third dies Agonalis of the year,
dedicated to Him in the month of May, in which there are several
other festivals devoted to the Manes. If Vediovis is a princeps in
the Underworld, and yet not Dis Pater, then He might be thought as
the first among the Manes, and that might point to Remus. We may be
able to point to how Ovid derived the name of Lemuria by saying that
originally it was named Remuria after Remus. Also we see how Ovid
raised the Shade of Remus on the first day of Lemuria (9 May) to tell
his story and contrast him with Romulus. Did Remus descend into the
Underworld as Vediovis, just as Romulus was to ascend in the Heavens
as Quirinus? If such an identity ever existed, it, too, I think,
would have been a later development. Secondly the Agonalia dedicated
to Vediovis occurs seven days, inclusive, from the Ides of May.
While the other lunar divisions of the month held special rites on
the Kalends, Nones, and Ides for celestial deities, the Last Quarter,
not mentioned in calendar notation or by Cato, was instead said to be
dedicated to the Manes. As in the case with the festival of Faunus
falling on the Nones of December, and from the commentary by Probus
on Virgil's Georgic I.10 where he says that, "In Italy, whatever sort
of sacrifice they offer annually is celebrated monthly," we thereby
assume that the Nones of each month may have been dedicated to Faunus
originally; it may be that this Last Quarter, which we know involved
rites for the Manes, may have originally involved Vediovis. The
only fact that can be definitively stated is that little of Vediovis
is known, or was known even by the Romans of the Late Republic.
"Why is the so-called Rex Sacrorum, that is to say, the "king of
sacred rites," forbidden to hold office or to address the people? Is
it because in early times the kings performed the greater part of the
most important rites, and themselves offered the sacrifices with the
assistance of the priests? But when they did not practice
moderation, but were arrogant and oppressive, most of the Greek
states took away their authority, and left to them only the offering
of sacrifices to the Gods; but the Romans expelled the kings
altogether, and to offer the sacrifices they appointed another, whom
they did not allow to hold office or to address the people, so that
in their sacred rites only they might seem to be subject to a king,
and to tolerate a kingship only on account of the Gods. At any rate,
there is a sacrifice traditionally performed in the forum at the
place called Comitium, and, when the Rex has performed this, he flees
from the forum as fast as he can." ~ Plutarch, Roman Questions 63
AUC 946 / 193 CE: Septimus Severus saluted by legions as imperator.
Our thought for today is from Demophilus 16.
"The self-sufficient and needy philosopher lives a life truly similar
to Divinity, and considers the non-possession of external and
unnecessary goods as the greatest wealth. For the acquisition of
riches sometimes inflames desire; but not to act in any respect
unjustly is sufficient to the enjoyment of a blessed life."
|
|
M. Moravius Piscinus Horatianus Quiritibus cultoribus Deorum et
omnibus salutem plurimam dicit:: Bonam habete Fortunam.
Hodie est ante diem VIII Kalendas Iunonias; haec dies comitialis est:
Fortunae Publicae populi Romani Quiritium in colle Quirinali;
Fortunae Primigeniae in colle Quirinali; Capra mane exoritur,
septentrionales venti.
Today celebrates the dedication of at least two of three temples of a
Fortuna in close proximity on the Quirinal Hill. The place of
the 'tres Fortunae.' On 24 June we will again come upon tres
Fortunae, the same three, only with temples placed on the far side of
the Tiber River around the Gardens of Caesar. On the Quirinal the
oldest would seem to have been Fors Fortuna. Then in 194 BCE a
temple was dedicated to Fortuna Primigenia and a later temple was
dedicated to Fortuna Publica.
First of our Fortunae, then is Fors Fortuna. It was once argued that
Her name derived from 'ferre' and thus that She was "the Goddess who
brings forth good fortune." Max Muller argued instead for a
different etymology derived from Sanskrit, where he posed Her as "the
bright light of each day," being comparable then to Fortuna huisce
diei. He further noted in support of his argument how, on 11 June, a
Temple of Fortuna was dedicated in the Forum Boarium in conjunction
with the Matralia. This Temple of Fortuna was said to contain a
statue of Servius Tullius, or that of Fortuna draped with the toga
praetexta of Servius Tullius. Several of Rome's temples of Fortuna
were attributed to this king, and his own story of Fortuna raising
him from humble origin to become king connected the early Fors
Fortuna with the destiny of children (Pliny, N. H. 8.194, 197; Varro
in Nonnius p. 189). "She who brings forth" and also "the bright light
of each day" can both refer to the fortune brought by children, or to
the good fortune Roman women needed during childbirth. Etymological
arguments are the weakest to make in trying to explain a God or
Goddess, but we might accept that Fors Fortuna did relate in some way
with children and birthing. While temples to other Fortunae came to
be built near Her own, across from the tres Fortunae on the Quirinal
was where there were temples to Juno Lucina and Salus, as well as the
sacred grove of Mefitis, each being a cultus of women concerned in
one way or another with caring for children.
AUC / 194 BCE: Dedication of Temples following the Second Punic War
"A number of temples were dedicated this year. One was the temple of
Juno Matuta in the Forum Olitorium. This had been vowed four years
previously and its building contracted for by C. Cornelius during his
consulship, and he dedicated it when he was censor. Another was the
temple of Faunus; the aediles C. Scribonius and Cn. Domitius had
contracted for its building two years before out of the money raised
by fines, and Cn. Domitius dedicated it when he was City praetor. Q.
Marcius Rulla dedicated a temple to Fortuna Primigenia on the
Quirinal, having been made duumvir for the purpose. P. Sempronius
Sophus had vowed it in the Punic War ten years previously, when he
was consul, and he had made the contract for it during his
censorship. C. Servilius also dedicated a temple to Jupiter on the
Island, which had been vowed six years before in a war with the Gauls
by the praetor L. Furius Purpurio, who when consul signed the
contract for its construction." ~ Titus Livius 34.53
The second temple dedicated to Fortuna on the Quirinal was thus that
of Fortuna Primigenia. Her cultus was brought to Rome from
Praeneste, where Her oracle was the most renown in Italy. The oracle
there was opened each year on 11 April (Fasti Praeneste). Inscribed
lots were placed within a vessel of water, the lots allowed then to
float to the top. A lot would then be selected by a young boy whose
hand was guided by Fortuna (Cicero, De Divinatione 2.86: quae
[sortes] Fortunae monitu pueri manu miscentur atque ducuntur). The
practice of using boys to draw lots would seem to have been
widespread. Images of boys handing lots to men come from Praeneste,
Ostia, and Rome. It is mentioned by Horace, Petronius Arbiter in
the 'Satyricon,' and by A. Tibullus:
"From the boy's hand thrice did she lift the sacred lots, and from
all three did the boy announce to her that the omens were sure
(1.3.11-12)."
At Rome itself it would seem that Fortuna Primigenia took on another
role and may have been confused by Plutarch with Fors Fortuna.
"Why do the Romans revere Fortuna Primigenia, or 'First Born,' as one
might translate it? Is it because by Fortune, as they say, it befell
Servius, born of a maidservant, to become a famous king of Rome? This
is the assumption which the majority of Romans make. Or is it rather
because Fortuna supplied the origin and birth of Rome? Or does the
matter have an explanation more natural and philosophic, which
assumes that Fortuna is the origin of everything, and Nature acquires
its solid frame by the operation of Fortuna, whenever order is
created in any store of matter gathered together at haphazard?" ~
Plutarch, Roman Questions 106
It shall also be instructive to look at comments by Pliny the Elder
on Fortuna. Following philosophers, he poses popular beliefs as
superstitious, but at the same time tells us something on how people
thought about Fortuna in general.
"For all over the world, in all places, and at all times, Fortuna is
the only one among the Gods whom every one invokes; She alone is
spoken of, She alone is accused and assumed guilty; She alone is in
our thoughts, is praised and blamed, and is loaded with reproaches;
wavering as She is, conceived by the generality of mankind to be
blind, wandering, inconstant, uncertain, variable, and often favoring
the unworthy. To Her are referred all our losses and all our gains,
and in casting up the accounts of mortals She alone balances the two
pages of our sheet. We are so much in the power of chance, that
change itself is considered as a God, and the existence of God
becomes doubtful." ~ Plinius Secundus, Historia Naturalis 2.5 (22)
"As to examples of the vicissitudes of Fortune, they are innumerable.
For what great pleasures has she ever given us, which have not taken
their rise in misfortunes? And what extraordinary misfortunes have
not taken their first rise in great pleasures? It was fortune that
preserved the Senator, M. Fidustius,1 who had been proscribed by
Sylla, for a period of thirty-six years. And yet he was proscribed a
second time; for he survived Sylla, even to the days of Antony, and,
as it appears, was proscribed by him, for no other reason but because
he had been proscribed before." ~ Plinius Secundus, Historia
Naturalis 7.43 (134)
Fortune and misfortune intertwined into every life. The reversal of
fortune is a theme one often encounters among Roman authors. Livy
will allude to it. Valerius Maximus devotes sections to examples of
men and women whose fortunes drastically changed over time. Ovid's
own life is an example of Fortuna's fickleness. One could begin with
Romulus and Remus, exposed at birth only to found the greatest City.
Numa, Hostilius, Tarquinius, Servius Tullius, all of the kings in
fact might be posed as legends with a moral on the transitory nature
of fortune. Here is only part of Pliny offers in continuing his
discussion of Fortuna.
"Fortune has determined that P. Ventidius alone should enjoy the
honor of a triumph over the Parthians, and yet the same individual,
when he was a child, She led in the triumphal procession of Cneius
Pompeius, the conqueror of Asculum. Indeed, Masurius says, that he
had been twice led in triumph; and according to Cicero, he used to
let out mules for the bakers of the camp. Most writers, indeed,
admit that his younger days were passed in the greatest poverty, and
that he wore the hob-nailed shoes of the common soldier. Balbus
Cornelius, also, the elder, was elected to the consulate; but he had
previously been accused, and the judges had been charged to discuss
the point whether he could or not lawfully be scourged with rods; he
being the first foreigner, born even on the very shores of the ocean,
who obtained that honor, which our ancestors denied even to the
people of Latium. Among other remarkable instances, also, we have
that of L. Fulvius, the consul of the rebellious Tusculani, who,
immediately upon his coming over to the Romans, obtained from them
the same honor. He is the only individual who, in the same year in
which he had been its enemy, enjoyed the honor of a triumph in Rome,
and that too, over the people whose consul he had previously been.
Down to the present time, L. Sylla is the only man who has claimed to
himself the surname of 'Felix;' a name which he derived, forsooth,
from the bloodshed of the citizens and the oppression of his country!
But what claim had he on which to found his title to this happiness?
Was it the power which he had of proscribing and massacring so many
thousands of his fellow-citizens? Oh interpretation most disgraceful,
and which must stamp him as 'Infelix' to all future time! Were not
the men who perished in those times, of the two, to be looked upon as
the more fortunate--seeing that with them we sympathize, while there
is no one who does not detest Sylla? And then, besides, was not the
close of his life more horrible than the sufferings which had been
experienced by any of those who had been proscribed by him? His very
flesh eating into itself, and so engendering his own punishment. And
this, although he may have thought proper to gloss over by his last
dream, in the very midst of which he may be said, in some measure, to
have died; and in which, as he pretended, he was told that his glory
alone had risen superior to all envy; though at the same time, he
confessed that it was still wanting to his supreme happiness, that he
had not dedicated the Capitol." ~ Plinius Secundus, Historia
Naturalis 7.44
Pliny goes on to discuss the fortunes of Augustus, and unlikely
person to rise in such an era of turmoil to such an exalted position,
and one, who having done so, seemed plagued with personal misfortunes
even as he provided Rome with a sustained era of peace and
prosperity. The fortunes of the Empire itself were to become
identified with that of the emperor. Prayer and sacrifice was
offered annually for the health and well-being of the emperor as a
way to secure the favor of the Gods for the Empire and its citizens.
But this idea had its roots in the Republic. The fortune of Rome was
often identified with the fortunes and misfortunes of its leaders.
Consuls were elected more often because they were thought to be lucky
than that they had proven any skill. It might that they bore the
name of a famous ancestor, and thus was thought to possess something
of that ancestor in themselves. Or there might have been some
incident to indicate that a candidate was favored by the Gods, as in
the case of Fabius Corvus, elected as consul when so young and
returned to office again because he proved to be fortunate in
battle. Likewise with Marius, champion of the people, returned as
consul more often than any other, because with each success he
demonstrated that the Gods favored him.
Thus we come to the third Fortuna, Fortuna Publica whose temple was
dedicated in 52 BCE. That fateful year saw Caesar away, unable at
first to put down the rebellion of Vercigetorix and finding himself
surrounded at Alesia. But at Rome, unrest in the street between Milo
and Clodius was brought to an end by the Senate appointing Pompeius
Magnus as sole consul; in effect a dictator. Clodius was already
dead by then and Milo was tried under Pompeius. Pompeius married the
widow of Crassus and elevated his father-in-law as his colleague.
Thus the greatest general of the time wed wealth and resolved his
rivalry with the Senate just as it seemed that Fortuna would deal
with Caesar Herself. Or was it instead the work of Fortuna
concentrating all of Caesar's enemies into one camp just as She
provided him with his greatest victory and the opportunity that would
see him rise to a height no other had attained? And with Caesar also
rose the fortune of Rome itself. Rome was fortunate to have borne
its Marcellus, its Scipioes, Fabii, Aemilius and so many other great
men; the Viri Summi that Augustus was to set up in his forum. This
is wherein we may understand Fortuna Publica, but She relates back to
Fors Fortuna, too, as we all place our hopes in Bona Fortuna that She
may bless our children as much as we hope that Fortuna Publica shall
bless the leaders among the children of our nation.
"Go, Quirites, celebrate with joy the Goddess of Good Fortune." ~
Ovid Fasti 6.775
Our thought for today is from Epicurus, Vatican Sayings 53:
"We must envy no one; for the good do not deserve envy and as for the
bad, the more they prosper, the more they ruin it for themselves."
|
|
M. Moravius Piscinus Horatianus Quiritibus cultoribus Deorum et
omnibus salutem plurimam dicit: Di vos semper servent.
Hodie est ante diem IV Kalendas Iunonias; haec dies comitialis est:
Drusus Caesar triumphans in urbem invectus est.
Sacra Deae Diae
In even-numbered years the Fratres Arvales performed a sacrifice for
the mysterious Goddess they called Dea Dia on 19 May. In odd
numbered years, as is our own AUC 2761, this sacrifice was made on 29
May. These were not public events, and indeed the only record occurs
within the private grove of the Fratres Arvales that lay five miles
from Rome.
"XIV KAL JUN [19 May 87 C.E.]Â…the Fratres Arvales performed
sacrifices to Dea Dia. C. Salvius Liberalis, who was acting in place
of the magister, C. Julius Silanus, in front of the grove sacrificed
onto the altar two expiatory pigs in expiation for polluting the
grove and the work to be carried out there. Then he sacrificed a cow
as an offering to Dea Dia... [The five attending Arvales] sat down in
the tetrastylum and feasted off the sacrifice, and taking up their
togae praetextae and their wreaths made of ears of corn with woolen
bands, they ascended the grove of Dea Dia with attendants clearing
the way and through Salvius Liberalis Nonius Bassus, who was acting
in place of the flamen, they sacrificed a choice lamb to Dea Dia and,
when the sacrifice was complete, they all made a libation with
incense and wine. Then, when the wreaths had been brought in
[returning into the temple] and the statues perfumed, they made Q.
Tillius Sassius annual magister from the coming Saturnalia to the
next, likewise they made T. Julius Celsus Marius Candidus flamen.
Then they went down to the tetrastylum, and there reclining in the
triclinium they feasted in the presence of the magister, C. Julius
Silanus. After the feast wearing a veil and sandals, with a wreath
woven with roses, with an attendant clearing the way, he ascended
above the starting gates [of the circus] and gave the signal to the
four-horse chariots and the leapers, with L. Maecius Postumus
presiding, he honored the victors with palms and silver wreaths. On
the same day at Rome, in the house of the magister C. Julius Silanus,
the same people who were in the grove dined." ~ CIL vi.2065, col. 2,
lines 15-40; ILS 5037
From other inscriptions in the Acta, we may bring out additional
details of the grove rites. The rites were never quite the same from
year to year as additional deities were invoked or else passed from
the rites. The entrails of sows offered to the geni loci of the grove
were burnt on an outdoor altar, and that of a cow's offered to Dea
Dia on a silver brazier. The magister would wear a toga praetexta to
make the initial sacrifices. Then he would bathe before donning
white robes to receive his fellow Arvales for a sacred meal of bread
and the meat of the sows. After the sacrifice of a white female lamb,
the Arvales were led in procession back to the temple where each
sacrificed pieces of liver coated with milk and flour three times
before the Goddess. The Fratres Arvales then returned to the outdoor
altar to repeat the sacrifice and offer prayers. It was at this
point in some years that the indigementa were invoked. In certain
years the Arvales would then return inside the temple to offer prayer
to sacred urns (ollae). The urns were carried outside where their
contents were tossed on the ground in an offering to Mater Larum.
The temple doors were then closed, loaves of bread wrapped in laurel
were given to slaves, who were then dismissed, and the Arvales then
proceeded back to the altar. Before the outdoor altar, the magister
sent two Arvales in "search of the cereals."Returning with these, a
sacrifice was then made of incense, sweet wine, milk, and sweet
cakes. At this point, only in the year 218 C. E., acolytes handed
out hymnals and they too were then dismissed. The Carmen Fratrum
Arvalium was chanted in ternary rhythm as the Arvales danced a
tripudatio in procession back into the temple for further rites to
the Dea Dia. The Carmen is never recorded as being used in any other
year. With the introduction and sudden disappearance of deities from
the Acta, the unusual indigitamenta, the non-consistency of rites
performed from year to year, and the sudden appearance of the very
Archaic Carmen Fratrum Arvalum, there is everything to suggest that
this sodalitas was an antiquarian invention. As such, the Acta is a
valuable source on how antiquarians of the Augustan and later eras
tried to reconstruct what they thought had been early rites of the
religio Romana even as they altered them to fit the needs of an
imperial institution.
Carmen Fratrum Arvalium
ENOS LASES IUVATE!
ENOS LASES IUVATE!
ENOS LASES IUVATE!
NEVE LUE MARMAR SINS INCURRERE IN PLEORIS.
NEVE LUE MARMAR SINS INCURRERE IN PLEORIS.
NEVE LUE MARMAR SINS INCURRERE IN PLEORIS.
SATUR FU, FERE MARS, LIMEN SALI, STA BERBER
SATUR FU, FERE MARS, LIMEN SALI, STA BERBER
SATUR FU, FERE MARS, LIMEN SALI, STA BERBER
ENOS MARMOR IUVATO, ENOS MARMOR IUVATO, ENOS MARMOR IUVATO!
TRIUMPHE! TRIUMPHE! TRIUMPHE! TRIUMPHE! TRIUMPHE!
Lares assist us, Lares delight us, Lares come to our aid!
Neither plague nor ruin, Marvors allow to be visited on us.
Marvors, neither plague nor ruin allow to be visited on us,
Neither plague nor ruin, Marvors allow to be visited on us.
But if however we are invaded, like Mars we shall leap across our
borders
If invaded, like Mars we shall leap across our borders.
If invaded, like Mars we shall leap across our borders
To sate you with the blood of our enemies and stay the barbarians.
To sate you with the blood of our enemies and stay the barbarians.
To sate you with the blood of our enemies and stay the barbarians.
Marmor assist us, Marmor defend us, Marmor come to our aid.
Triumph, triumph, triumph, triumph, triumph!
Ambarvalia
It was once assumed that the rites performed by the Fratres Arvales
on 29 May in odd-numbered years, or otherwise on 19 May in even-
numbered years, corresponded to what is called an ambarvalia. In
nineteenth century scholarship it was common to piece together
discordant information in order to fill in the many gaps in our
record of Roman practices. Such is the case with an ambarvalia.
This interpretation lies with the Acta Matyrum, a Christian record
from northern Italy that dates to 393 CE. Its rustic calendar refers
to the performance of segetes lustrantur, or a blessing of the
fields. Relying then on passages from Virgil and Tibullus, this
ambarvalia was said to take the form of conducting a sow, an ewe, and
a cow in a circuit around the fields to be blessed before being
offered in the special form of sacrificed. The sacrifice was called
a suovitaurilia, the name referring to the three victims. An example
of such a sacrifice, used for such a purpose, is found in Cato the
Elder
"The proper way to purify the grainfields is in this manner. Order a
piglet, a lamb, and a calf to be led around: With the favor of the
Gods, everything may turn out well, so I entrust to you, Manius that
you may lead or carry as many of the sacrificial victims as you wish
around my estate, my field, and my land." ~ M. Porcius Cato, De
Agricultura 141
With Cato the sacrifice was made to Mars, while with Virgil and
Macrobius it is Ceres who is said to receive the sacrifice. No
satisfactory explanation has been put forth to reconcile the
difference, if indeed there ever was an ambarvalia per se. The term
itself is derived from Greek. In describing a Roman lustratio, the
Greek historian Strabo used the term 'ambarouian.' Ambarvalia is
found in an 8th century source, with reference to Romulus and Remus
blessing their fields. There are likewise images of suovitaurilia,
and images of victims being led about, presumably in a circuit. Such
rites were used in founding colonies, dedicating a temple precinct,
establishing military camps, and from Cato we must assume as well
that such rites were used when founding a new estate and each year on
the anniversary of the estate. These were lustrationes. Ambarvalia
as a ritual distinct from lustrationes seems instead to be a modern
invention. At best, it was a word invented to describe how the
sacrificial victim were led in a circuit as part of the ritual.
As for the Fratres Arvales performing an ambarvalia, the Acta of
their order never mentions any procession of victims, or any blessing
of fields, no lustrationes of the sort to suggest an Ambarvalia, and
although a sow, an ewe, and a cow might be sacrificed during the
course of rites they held, such victims were never sacrificed as a
souvitaurlia to any one deity. It is an entirely modern invention
that there was an ambarvalia held on this date at Rome, and an error
of method, seeing evidence where none existed, that led some to
assume that the Fratres Arvales ever conducted such rites.
Our thought for today is from Marcus Aurelius, Meditations 7.73:
"When thou hast done a good act and another has received it, why dost
thou look for a third thing besides these, as fools do, either to
have the reputation of having done a good act or to obtain a return?"
|
|