Selected messages in Nova-Roma group. Sep 25-30, 2008

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 57772 From: Robert Levee Date: 2008-09-25
Subject: Re: Roman priests and State religion
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 57773 From: M. Lucretius Agricola Date: 2008-09-25
Subject: Re: Roman priests and State religion
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 57774 From: Maior Date: 2008-09-25
Subject: Re: Roman priests and State religion
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 57775 From: Gaius Petronius Dexter Date: 2008-09-26
Subject: Re: Roman priests and State religion
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 57776 From: David Kling (Modianus) Date: 2008-09-26
Subject: Re: Roman priests and State religion
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 57777 From: Publius Memmius Albucius Date: 2008-09-26
Subject: Re: Romans and (State) religion
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 57778 From: marcushoratius Date: 2008-09-26
Subject: a. d. VI Kalendas Octobres: Venus Genetrix
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 57779 From: marcushoratius Date: 2008-09-26
Subject: Re: Roman priests and State religion
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 57780 From: Gaius Petronius Dexter Date: 2008-09-26
Subject: Re: Roman priests and State religion
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 57781 From: Titus Flavius Aquila Date: 2008-09-26
Subject: AW: [Nova-Roma] Re: Roman priests and State religion
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 57782 From: Publius Memmius Albucius Date: 2008-09-26
Subject: Re: Romans and State religion
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 57783 From: Cases Livia Date: 2008-09-26
Subject: Re: Roman priests and State religion
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 57784 From: Robert Levee Date: 2008-09-26
Subject: Re: Roman priests and State religion
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 57785 From: Gaius Petronius Dexter Date: 2008-09-27
Subject: Thanks.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 57786 From: Q. Caecilius Metellus Date: 2008-09-27
Subject: Re: Roman priests and State religion
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 57787 From: marcushoratius Date: 2008-09-27
Subject: a. d. V Kalendas Octobres: Cloelia and Valeria
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 57788 From: Lucia Livia Plauta Date: 2008-09-27
Subject: Re: Roman priests and State religion
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 57789 From: Avv. Claudio Guzzo Date: 2008-09-28
Subject: roman priests and state religion
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 57790 From: Avv. Claudio Guzzo Date: 2008-09-28
Subject: religiones romanae?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 57791 From: David Kling (Modianus) Date: 2008-09-28
Subject: Re: religiones romanae?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 57792 From: marcushoratius Date: 2008-09-28
Subject: a. d. IV Kalendas Octobres: Hercules, Pinarii, and Potitii
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 57793 From: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com Date: 2008-09-28
Subject: Latin study online resources, 9/28/2008, 12:00 pm
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 57794 From: Maior Date: 2008-09-28
Subject: Re: religiones romanae?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 57795 From: Lucia Livia Plauta Date: 2008-09-28
Subject: Re: roman priests and state religion
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 57796 From: Lucia Livia Plauta Date: 2008-09-28
Subject: Re: religiones romanae?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 57797 From: Maior Date: 2008-09-28
Subject: Re: roman priests and state religion
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 57798 From: marcushoratius Date: 2008-09-29
Subject: a. d. III Kalendas Octrobres: Fabricius and Pyrrhus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 57799 From: Avv. Claudio Guzzo Date: 2008-09-29
Subject: roman-maine religio?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 57800 From: Annia Minucia Marcella Date: 2008-09-29
Subject: Re: roman-maine religio?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 57801 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2008-09-29
Subject: Re: religio?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 57802 From: Avv. Claudio Guzzo Date: 2008-09-29
Subject: religiones romanae?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 57803 From: Annia Minucia Marcella Date: 2008-09-29
Subject: Re: religio?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 57804 From: philippe cardon Date: 2008-09-29
Subject: Re: religio?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 57805 From: philippe cardon Date: 2008-09-29
Subject: Re: catholiicisma sa RR?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 57806 From: philippe cardon Date: 2008-09-29
Subject: (no subject)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 57807 From: R.H.M.C. Date: 2008-09-29
Subject: Re:
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 57808 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2008-09-29
Subject: Re: religio?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 57809 From: philippe cardon Date: 2008-09-29
Subject: Re: religio?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 57810 From: David Kling (Modianus) Date: 2008-09-29
Subject: Re: roman-maine religio?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 57811 From: Colin Brodd Date: 2008-09-29
Subject: Re: religio?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 57812 From: Maior Date: 2008-09-29
Subject: Re: religio?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 57813 From: Titus Flavius Aquila Date: 2008-09-29
Subject: AW: [Nova-Roma] religiones romanae?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 57814 From: Lucia Livia Plauta Date: 2008-09-29
Subject: Re: religio?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 57815 From: PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@aol.com Date: 2008-09-29
Subject: Re: religio?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 57816 From: Patrick D. Owen Date: 2008-09-29
Subject: The Sacra et Religio
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 57817 From: titus.aquila Date: 2008-09-30
Subject: Sodalitas proDIIS A Temple for the Gods in Rome, founded
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 57818 From: Steve Moore Date: 2008-09-30
Subject: Re: Sodalitas proDIIS A Temple for the Gods in Rome, founded
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 57819 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2008-09-30
Subject: Rudimenta Latina course
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 57820 From: Titus Flavius Aquila Date: 2008-09-30
Subject: AW: [Nova-Roma] Re: Sodalitas proDIIS A Temple for the Gods in Rome,
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 57821 From: marcushoratius Date: 2008-09-30
Subject: Pridie Kalendae Octobrae: Asculum
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 57822 From: Gaius Petronius Dexter Date: 2008-09-30
Subject: Re : [Nova-Roma] Sodalitas proDIIS A Temple for the Gods in Rome, fo
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 57823 From: Colin Brodd Date: 2008-09-30
Subject: Re: Sodalitas proDIIS A Temple for the Gods in Rome, founded
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 57824 From: Titus Flavius Aquila Date: 2008-09-30
Subject: AW: [Nova-Roma] Sodalitas proDIIS A Temple for the Gods in Rome, fou
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 57825 From: Andreas Lachmann Date: 2008-09-30
Subject: Re: Circenses Romani SEMI and FINALS results ! Chariot race Raetia
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 57826 From: Lucia Livia Plauta Date: 2008-09-30
Subject: Re: Re : [Nova-Roma] Sodalitas proDIIS A Temple for the Gods in Rome
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 57827 From: Lyn Dowling Date: 2008-09-30
Subject: An attempt to inject lighter subject matter
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 57828 From: Gaius Petronius Dexter Date: 2008-09-30
Subject: Re: An attempt to inject lighter subject matter
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 57829 From: Gnaeus Caelius Ahenobarbus Date: 2008-09-30
Subject: Re: An attempt to inject lighter subject matter
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 57830 From: Lyn Dowling Date: 2008-09-30
Subject: Re: An attempt to inject lighter subject matter
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 57831 From: Lyn Dowling Date: 2008-09-30
Subject: Re: An attempt to inject lighter subject matter
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 57832 From: adriano.rota Date: 2008-09-30
Subject: Toooo much religious Blah Blah
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 57833 From: luciusjul25@yahoo.com Date: 2008-09-30
Subject: Re: Toooo much religious Blah Blah
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 57834 From: adriano.rota Date: 2008-09-30
Subject: Re: Toooo much religious Blah Blah
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 57835 From: adriano.rota Date: 2008-09-30
Subject: Question about Taxes/Donations
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 57836 From: Lucius Iulius Regulus Date: 2008-09-30
Subject: Re: Toooo much religious Blah Blah
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 57837 From: James V Hooper Date: 2008-09-30
Subject: Re: Question about Taxes/Donations
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 57838 From: Gnaeus Caelius Ahenobarbus Date: 2008-09-30
Subject: Re: Toooo much religious Blah Blah
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 57839 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2008-09-30
Subject: Re: Question about Taxes/Donations
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 57840 From: Annia Minucia Marcella Date: 2008-09-30
Subject: Re: Toooo much religious Blah Blah
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 57841 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2008-09-30
Subject: Re: Toooo much religious Blah Blah
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 57842 From: PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@aol.com Date: 2008-09-30
Subject: Re: Toooo much religious Blah Blah
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 57843 From: PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@aol.com Date: 2008-09-30
Subject: Re: Question about Taxes/Donations
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 57844 From: adriano.rota Date: 2008-09-30
Subject: Re: Toooo much religious Blah Blah
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 57845 From: adriano.rota Date: 2008-09-30
Subject: Re: Question about Taxes/Donations



Group: Nova-Roma Message: 57772 From: Robert Levee Date: 2008-09-25
Subject: Re: Roman priests and State religion
Salve, A. Livia Plauta

I must say, that to accuse Claudio to be mentally deranged because he believes in the Gods and Goddesses of Roma, is very rude and actually, if memory serves me right a direct violation of our codes of conduct, here in Nova Roma aa pertains to the conversations posted to our board.I would advise you to treat the feelings of those whom are practitioners of the Religio Romana, with the same respect as you do with your co-religionists.To seek a better understanding of the Religio Romana would be a most welcome turn of events.

In The Gods!
Appius Galeriusd Aurelianus



--- On Thu, 9/25/08, Cases Livia <cases@...> wrote:

> From: Cases Livia <cases@...>
> Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Roman priests and State religion
> To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> Date: Thursday, September 25, 2008, 4:24 PM
> Salve Claudio,
> your posts recently don't make any sense (really, I
> couldn't understand the last one, even after reading it
> twice). This might be because your English is bad, but be
> careful, because you are giving the impression of being
> mentally deranged.
>
> Claudio, i tuoi post su questa lista di recente non hanno
> né capo né coda (davvero, non ho capito niente, neanche
> rileggendo). Forse č perché non sai abbastanza inglese, ma
> stai attento, perché dai l'impressione di essere
> squilibrato mentalmente.
>
> Vale,
> L. Livia Plauta
>
>
>
> "Avv. Claudio Guzzo"
> <claudio.guzzo@...> írta:
>
>
> >
> >
> > Salve. Religio romana was, during the Roman ages loved
> by novaromans, christian too. Now there are roman priests
> and State religion in Vatican City and there are a lot of
> christian (i.e. roman) religions in the world: new roman
> (state) religions. If you write religio romana and think
> cultus deorum, there are too many religions now: Roma
> (civil nature) and her Gods don't need a new religion,
> but to be loved. Vale ACC
> >
> >
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
> Olcsó repülőjegyet mindenkinek!
> Repjegyek a legjobb napi áron akár BBP és sztornó
> biztosítással is.
> repulojegy.budavartours.hu
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 57773 From: M. Lucretius Agricola Date: 2008-09-25
Subject: Re: Roman priests and State religion
Agricola Aureliano sal.

I think you mis-read Livia's message. She didn't say he IS deranged,
just that there is some problem with his writing, which she suggested
may be related to his English skills. Also, you might have missed it
that she is a very active cultrix. Look on the page for the recent
conventus for confirmation of this.
http://www.novaroma.org/nr/VI_Conventus_Novae_Romae

Writing in a second language is hard, and some of the topics we
discuss are difficult ones. But many of us can read other languages
that we do not post in, so Livia set a good example by posting in
English and Italian. I know it may be tedious to do, but this double
composition can help us all to understand each other.

optime vale, et valete Omnes!






--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Robert Levee <galerius_of_rome@...>
wrote:
>
> Salve, A. Livia Plauta
>
> I must say, that to accuse Claudio to be mentally deranged because
he believes in the Gods and Goddesses of Roma, is very rude and
actually, if memory serves me right a direct violation of our codes of
conduct, here in Nova Roma aa pertains to the conversations posted to
our board.I would advise you to treat the feelings of those whom are
practitioners of the Religio Romana, with the same respect as you do
with your co-religionists.To seek a better understanding of the
Religio Romana would be a most welcome turn of events.
>
> In The Gods!
> Appius Galeriusd Aurelianus
>
>
>
> --- On Thu, 9/25/08, Cases Livia <cases@...> wrote:
>
> > From: Cases Livia <cases@...>
> > Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Roman priests and State religion
> > To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> > Date: Thursday, September 25, 2008, 4:24 PM
> > Salve Claudio,
> > your posts recently don't make any sense (really, I
> > couldn't understand the last one, even after reading it
> > twice). This might be because your English is bad, but be
> > careful, because you are giving the impression of being
> > mentally deranged.
> >
> > Claudio, i tuoi post su questa lista di recente non hanno
> > né capo né coda (davvero, non ho capito niente, neanche
> > rileggendo). Forse č perché non sai abbastanza inglese, ma
> > stai attento, perché dai l'impressione di essere
> > squilibrato mentalmente.
> >
> > Vale,
> > L. Livia Plauta
> >
> >
> >
> > "Avv. Claudio Guzzo"
> > <claudio.guzzo@...> írta:
> >
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > Salve. Religio romana was, during the Roman ages loved
> > by novaromans, christian too. Now there are roman priests
> > and State religion in Vatican City and there are a lot of
> > christian (i.e. roman) religions in the world: new roman
> > (state) religions. If you write religio romana and think
> > cultus deorum, there are too many religions now: Roma
> > (civil nature) and her Gods don't need a new religion,
> > but to be loved. Vale ACC
> > >
> > >
> >
> > ______________________________________________________________________
> > Olcsó repülÅ`jegyet mindenkinek!
> > Repjegyek a legjobb napi áron akár BBP és sztornó
> > biztosítással is.
> > repulojegy.budavartours.hu
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 57774 From: Maior Date: 2008-09-25
Subject: Re: Roman priests and State religion
M. Hortensia App. Galerio L. Liviae spd;
new people to this list might not recognize the name, I
unfortunatly do, Claudio Guzzo is some kind of fascist who
supported, the neo-nazi civis [what was his name? hmm], until we
booted him out of Nova Roma.
I believe that's why L. Livia Plauta said this, as he's just not
rational and makes these silly posts from time to time on the ML.
optime vale
M. Hortensia Maior
sacerdos Mentis




> > > "Avv. Claudio Guzzo"
> > > <claudio.guzzo@> írta:
> > >
> > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Salve. Religio romana was, during the Roman ages loved
> > > by novaromans, christian too. Now there are roman priests
> > > and State religion in Vatican City and there are a lot of
> > > christian (i.e. roman) religions in the world: new roman
> > > (state) religions. If you write religio romana and think
> > > cultus deorum, there are too many religions now: Roma
> > > (civil nature) and her Gods don't need a new religion,
> > > but to be loved. Vale ACC
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
_____________________________________________________________________
_
> > > Olcsó repülÅ`jegyet mindenkinek!
> > > Repjegyek a legjobb napi áron akár BBP és sztornó
> > > biztosítással is.
> > > repulojegy.budavartours.hu
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 57775 From: Gaius Petronius Dexter Date: 2008-09-26
Subject: Re: Roman priests and State religion
 
C. Petronius App. Galerio s.p.d.,
 
Love. What our love does with the gods and the goddesses? In my opinion, gods and goddesses do not care about our love in them and certainly prefer to be worshipped. The respect towards the gods is not to love them but to respect the rituals of our worship in them. They are countless and who loves everybody loves nobody.
 
In addition, I am very cautious with the term of love in the religions, so many peoples indeed have suffered with all these "religions of love" and have burned in the faggots of the Inquisition's love. Because the love in god often hides the hatred in mankind. God is so perfect, men are so imperfect, are not they?
 
Fortunately the religio Romana does not work on this scheme.
 
Vale.
 
C. Petronius Dexter
 
 
----- Message d'origine -----
De : Robert Levee <galerius_of_rome@...>
À : Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Envoyé le : Jeudi, 25 Septembre 2008, 22h12mn 25s
Objet : Re: [Nova-Roma] Roman priests and State religion

Salve,
I must agree with you Claudio,our GODS truly need to be loved and not relegated to ritual who's only meaning is a contractual arrangement, absent of love for them.There are many who do not see them as a focal point in their lives, and that is fine for those who are officials of the State, who are bound to honor them to hold office.All who respect the State should be required to show respect to them.For those others of us who see them in the loving sence, should do all we can to spread this understanding to others, that this Religio may inspire the world.

In The Gods!
Appius Galerius Aurelianus

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 57776 From: David Kling (Modianus) Date: 2008-09-26
Subject: Re: Roman priests and State religion
Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus Appio Galerio Aureliano salutem dicit

Your enthusiasm for the Religio Romana is encouraging.  However, you might be careful who you seek to attack in showing your devotion.  The tribune, A. Livia Plauta, was pointing out a possible linguistic hurdle and how this person appeared to some -- myself included.  Likewise, the individual in question has been known for making very ludicrous sayings in the past -- so his reputation is already tarnished.

Organizationally, the Gods seek our honoring of them and not so much our love.  Individually, you can do as you please -- I know I show love to my ancestors and devotion to the Gods I regularly honor.

Vale;

Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus


On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 6:27 PM, Robert Levee <galerius_of_rome@...> wrote:

Salve, A. Livia Plauta

I must say, that to accuse Claudio to be mentally deranged because he believes in the Gods and Goddesses of Roma, is very rude and actually, if memory serves me right a direct violation of our codes of conduct, here in Nova Roma aa pertains to the conversations posted to our board.I would advise you to treat the feelings of those whom are practitioners of the Religio Romana, with the same respect as you do with your co-religionists.To seek a better understanding of the Religio Romana would be a most welcome turn of events.

In The Gods!
Appius Galeriusd Aurelianus




Group: Nova-Roma Message: 57777 From: Publius Memmius Albucius Date: 2008-09-26
Subject: Re: Romans and (State) religion
Galerio Petronioque s.d.

I agree with Dexter's first paragraph.

"Love" is not a Roman religio concept, as far as I know. Moreover, if
some of our gods were known to be kind, other ones not. So ancient
Romans used to mind that these last ones, because of ritual
abstention, did not get angry. The gods may be good, but they can be
very bad too. But the central point is that... they are gods, and
watching all on the balance of our Roman universe. An angry god, and
the world is in harmony any longer. This is why rituals are important
in religio romana.

On the difference between State officials and other citizens, I will
differ with Hon. Galerius, for everyone of us has three levels of
duties : family, state, gods. We cannot take one circle, and leave
aside the others, nor say, dear Aureliani, that "All who respect the
State should be required to show respect to them. For those others of
us", because as Romans, we are all to respect the State (not
necessarily the individuals in office!! ;-) ), because it is a part
of the Roman conception of the religio. The State, as the family may
work well or not, like the gods be kind or not. But as such, they
cannot be split or one of them let aside.

Concerning the relation (understanding, etc.) to others, we have the
Roman virtues:

http://www.novaroma.org/nr/Roman_Virtues


Valete ambo,



P. Memmius Albucius
aed. cur.



--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Gaius Petronius Dexter"
<jfarnoud94@...> wrote:
>
>
> C. Petronius App. Galerio s.p.d.,
>
> Love. What our love does with the gods and the goddesses? In my
opinion, gods and goddesses do not care about our love in them and
certainly prefer to be worshipped. The respect towards the gods is
not to love them but to respect the rituals of our worship in them.
They are countless and who loves everybody loves nobody.
>
> In addition, I am very cautious with the term of love in the
religions, so many peoples indeed have suffered with all
these "religions of love" and have burned in the faggots of the
Inquisition's love. Because the love in god often hides the hatred in
mankind. God is so perfect, men are so imperfect, are not they?
>
> Fortunately the religio Romana does not work on this scheme.
>
> Vale.
>
> C. Petronius Dexter
>
>
> ----- Message d'origine -----
> De : Robert Levee <galerius_of_rome@...>
> À : Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> Envoyé le : Jeudi, 25 Septembre 2008, 22h12mn 25s
> Objet : Re: [Nova-Roma] Roman priests and State religion
>
> Salve,
> I must agree with you Claudio,our GODS truly need to be loved and
not relegated to ritual who's only meaning is a contractual
arrangement, absent of love for them.There are many who do not see
them as a focal point in their lives, and that is fine for those who
are officials of the State, who are bound to honor them to hold
office.All who respect the State should be required to show respect
to them.For those others of us who see them in the loving sence,
should do all we can to spread this understanding to others, that
this Religio may inspire the world.
>
> In The Gods!
> Appius Galerius Aurelianus
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 57778 From: marcushoratius Date: 2008-09-26
Subject: a. d. VI Kalendas Octobres: Venus Genetrix
M. Moravius Piscinus cultoribus Deorum et omnibus salutem plurimam
dicit: Venus nos complectatur dulce.

Hodie est ante diem VI Kalendas Octobres; haec dies comitialis est:
feriae Veneris Genetricis in foro Caesari

AUC 708 / 45 BCE: Dedication of the Temple of Venus Genetrix in the
Forum of Caesar.

"Venus Genetrix, charmer of Gods and mankind, nurturing Mother,
beneath the starry signs that glide through the night, You enliven
the ship-bearing seas and the fruitful earth, since it is through You
that all things are conceived and animated into life to behold the
Light of Day. Goddess, for You the winds make way, the heavenly
clouds open at Your coming, the miraculous earth greets You with
sweet scented flowers, for You the surface of the seas laugh, and the
peaceful heavens glisten in luminescence." ~ Lucretius Carus, De
Rerum Natura 1.1-9

"There are four Goddesses named Venus. First is the Daughter of
Caelus and Dies; secondthe Daughter of Aetheria and Oceanus who they
say was born from sea-foam; third is She who married Volcanus, and
who embroiledHerselfwith Mars, from whom Cupid is said to have been
born; and fourth is the Daughter of Cyprus and Syria, who took Adonis
as Her lover." ~ Lucius Ampelius, Quot fuere Ioves vel alii in loco
dii deaeque 9.9

Following the Gallic sack of Rome in the fourth century when so much
of Rome's past was lost, patrician families began to invent new
family histories to enhance their prestige. Elsewhere in Italy it
was becoming fashionable to claim city founders or tribal ancestors
from the stories of Homer. Thus the Marsi were said to have
decscended from a son of Ulysses by Circe, the Sabines claimed
descent from a Spartan, and the Latin city of Lanuvium claimed Aeneas
as its founder. By the end of the century Rome had grown in
strength, defeated the Latin League and attained hegemony over
central Italy. It adopted the story of Aeneas, going so far as to
build the heroon of Aeneas at Lanuvium. Then it had to integrate the
story of Aeneas into its own founding myths.

At the legendary city of Alba Longa the dual kingship was said to
have derived from the joining of the Latins with the Trojans. The
civil kings descended from Latinus and the priestly kings descended
from Ascanius. Ascanius, son of Aeneas and Creusa, was called Iulus
at Rome and the priest kings of Alba Longa came from the gens Iulia.
It was this legendary origin that made Julius Caesar's election to
pontifex maximus so special as the association could not be
overlooked, and it may have even played a part in his election over
other candidates. Through Aeneas all Iulii descended from Venus.
But according to legend Romulus and Remus, the sons of Mars, had come
from Alba Longa, and from their mother Rhea Silvia they, too, had
descended from Aeneas as well and thus from Venus. The Greek myth of
the adultry of Venus with Mars thus held special significance at
Rome, too. In a sense all Romans, and all Latins for that matter,
traced themselves back to the union of Aeneas and Lavinia. And thus,
also, did the Romans see themselves as descended from Venus as well
as from Mars. Or as today celebrates Her, all Romans, and not just
the Iulii, derive from Venus Genetrix. Placing Her temple in the
Forum Iulii of course had its added significance, too. Even in the
fifth century of the common era, we can still find these legendary
origins of Rome being played upon to define Rome:

"As authors of our race we acknowledge Venus and Mars — mother of the
sons of Aeneas, father of the scions of Romulus: clemency in victory
tempers armed strength." ~ Rutilius Claudius Namatianus, De Reditu
suo 1, p. 4


The Flamen and Flaminca Dialis are a Pair

"If the Dialis has lost his wife he abdicates his office. The
marriaqge of the priest cannot be dissolved except by death." ~ Aulus
Gellius, Noctes Atticae 10.15.22-23

Plutarch Roman Questions 50: "Why did the priest of Jupiter (Flamen
Dialis) resign his office if his wife died, as Ateius has recorded?
Is it because the man who has taken a wife and then lost her is more
unfortunate than one who has never taken a wife? For the house of the
married man is complete, but the house of him who has married and
later lost his wife is not only incomplete, but also crippled. Or is
it because the wife assists her husband in the rites, so that many of
them cannot be performed without the wife's presence, and for a man
who has lost his wife to marry again immediately is neither possible
perhaps nor otherwise seemly? Wherefore it was formerly illegal for
the flamen to divorce his wife; and it is still, as it seems,
illegal, but in my day Domitian once permitted it on petition. The
priests were present at that ceremony of divorce and performed many
horrible, strange, and gloomy rites. One might be less surprised at
this resignation of the flamen if one should adduce also the fact
that when one of the censors died, the other was obliged to resign
his office; but when the censor Livius Drusus died, his colleague
Aemilius Scaurus was unwilling to give up his office until certain
tribunes ordered him to be led away to prison."


Death of Antonius

"Cleopatra herself rushed suddenly into the mausoleum, pretending
that she feared Caesar (Augustus) and desired by some means or other
to forestall him by taking her own life, but really as an invitation
to Antony to enter there also. He had a suspicion, to be sure, that
he was being betrayed, but actually pitied her more, one might say,
than himself. Cleopatra, doubtless, was fully aware of this and
hoped that if he should be informed that she was dead, he would not
wish to survive her, but would die at once. Accordingly she hastened
into the tomb with a eunuch and two maidservants, and from there sent
a message to him from which he should infer that she was dead. And
he, when he heard it, did not delay, but was seized by a desire to
follow her in death. He first asked one of the bystanders to slay
him; but when the man drew his sword and slew himself, Antony wished
to imitate his courage and so gave himself a wound and fell upon his
face, causing the bystanders to believe that he was dead. At this an
outcry was raised, and Cleopatra, hearing it, peered out over the top
of the tomb. By a certain contrivance its doors, once closed, could
not be opened again, but the upper part of it next to the roof was
not yet fully completed. Now when some of them saw her peering out
at this point, they raised a shout so that even Antony heard. So he,
learning that she survived, stood up, as if he had still the power to
live; but, as had lost much blood, he despaired of his life and
besought the bystanders to carry him to the monument and to hoist him
up by the ropes that were hanging there to lift the stone blocks.

"So Antony died there in Cleopatra's bosom." ~ Cassius Dio, Historia
Bk 51.10.4-9


Today's thought is from Sextus, Select Sentences 42 and 43:

"The intellect of the wise man is always with divinity. A God dwells
in the intellect of the wise man."
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 57779 From: marcushoratius Date: 2008-09-26
Subject: Re: Roman priests and State religion
M. Moravius C. Petroni et omnibus s. p. d. :

"The religious man," according to Varro, "reveres the Gods as he
would his parents, for They are good, more apt to spare than to
punish."

There are many forms of love, and there are many Gods and Goddesses.
I don't believe anyone can make generalities here.

Venus, the Goddess of Love, must be wooed like a lover. Today we may
see only the statues of marble or bronze, or perhaps like the Venus
of Antioch a statue of silver. Recall that these were once painted,
adorned in gold jewelry, and perhaps also dressed. Ovid, for one,
speaks about bringing Her presents in the same way as one courts his
mistress, and thus adorn Her statues with necklaces and braclets -
just as was found on the Venus of Antioch. There are references,
too, of the statues, at least some, being dressed in garments. In
one example, Juno Capitolina is said to have been presented with a
special mantle embroidered by the matrons of Rome and I don't think
that you can discount the possibility that it was used to dress a
statue of Her.

Juno is approached in a different way than one would approach Venus,
for trinkets and gifts alone do not sway Her. You might call it
love, but it is not the same kind of love to offer Juno as one might
Venus.

Now Jupiter one may see as a fatherly figure and thus love Him as one
would an ideal Father. But I recall, too, how Seneca spoke about
women lulling about the Capitolium, firmly convinced that Jupiter had
taken them as His lovers. Well, He was known to do so on occasion.
Diana, Proserpina, and Venus took mortal lovers from time to time,
too. Apollo chased after several women but never seemed to have much
luck with the girls. But then Silvanus, Neptunus, and Mars, not
exactly known as loving Gods still had Their gentler moments.

Varro also said, "the Gods do not want sacrifice, Their statues even
less." A perfunctary performance of a ritual, without any feeling,
is simply not acceptable. Even Cicero, known for his cynical
attitudes toward religion, speaks to the requirement of mental
attitude in approaching the Gods, and that material gifts are less
important (De Legibus 2.8.19; 2.10.24).

The Lares are your ancestors, and I generally advise that people
approach their Lares, speak to them and treat them, in the same
manner as you would your grandparents. I have no interest in playing
Ganymede to Jupiter. Instead I see Him as a Father and love and
admire Him as I do my own father. With a certain Goddess, not Venus,
I have had an experience which, for a lack of better words, might be
described as erotic love. Then for Juno, I didn't really come to
appreciate Her until I entered the latter half of my life, and I
would describe my feelings for Her as love, a very mature kind of
love and not the kind one might have towards a mistress. With Ceres
I have had a relationship for as long as I can remember, as Ferentina
is my family's Lar familiaris, and my thoughts towards Her has always
been as love towards a Mother. And next would have to be Mars, with
whom I have had a relationship for over fifty years now. My family
offered me into His service when I was four. He has been my patron,
I wouldn't describe Him as friend, or describe our relationship in
terms of brotherly love. Then in my family's tradition there is a
Goddess whose name might be translated as "Most Mother," but who is
more like Hecate or Nemesis, or even like Juno on a bad day. She is
very instructive, and can be helpful, but I wouldn't recommend
approaching Her in any manner but with the utmost respect. Other
deities have been important at different times of my life - Neptunus
when I was a teen, and so forth - so that I have various
relationships with various Gods and Goddesses. They are a community
of Gods, and there is a community of men and Gods. So our
relationships with Them shall vary as we also have with members of
our human community. Some we may meet only briefly. Some never at
all. With others we may become very close, even in a relationship
that may be described as a form of love.

Many Gods and Goddesses, lesser gods and goddesses, nymphae, fauni,
silvani, Manes. Many different people who relate to the Gods, each
in their own way to each in His or Her own way. I don't think anyone
can offer us a generalization of what is correct in all circumstances
or for all cultores Deorum, or for all of the Gods and Goddesses.
Like "love" the word "worship" can have different connotations and
levels of meaning. As cultores we offer "worship" as that is what
the name means, and "worship" can imply a level of love, too. For
only a supperstitious man would "worship" a God he fears. Respect,
adoration, sense of duty, pride in tradition are all part of offering
worship, too. If you go through the ancient texts I think you find
that these mental attitudes are what the Maiores believed was most
important in offering worship. What you sacrifice, what words you
speak, what motions you go through in performing a ritual have no
significance without the proper mental attitude. Call it love or
something else, it is our social bonds with the Gods, our mutual
relationships rather than contractual arrangements that are most
important to maintaing the Pax Deorum for ourselves.

Valete et vadete in pace Deorum


--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Gaius Petronius Dexter"
<jfarnoud94@...> wrote:
>
>
> C. Petronius App. Galerio s.p.d.,
>
> Love. What our love does with the gods and the goddesses? In my
opinion, gods and goddesses do not care about our love in them and
certainly prefer to be worshipped. The respect towards the gods is
not to love them but to respect the rituals of our worship in them.
They are countless and who loves everybody loves nobody.
>
> In addition, I am very cautious with the term of love in the
religions, so many peoples indeed have suffered with all
these "religions of love" and have burned in the faggots of the
Inquisition's love. Because the love in god often hides the hatred in
mankind. God is so perfect, men are so imperfect, are not they?
>
> Fortunately the religio Romana does not work on this scheme.
>
> Vale.
>
> C. Petronius Dexter
>
>
> ----- Message d'origine -----
> De : Robert Levee <galerius_of_rome@...>
> À : Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> Envoyé le : Jeudi, 25 Septembre 2008, 22h12mn 25s
> Objet : Re: [Nova-Roma] Roman priests and State religion
>
> Salve,
> I must agree with you Claudio,our GODS truly need to be loved and
not relegated to ritual who's only meaning is a contractual
arrangement, absent of love for them.There are many who do not see
them as a focal point in their lives, and that is fine for those who
are officials of the State, who are bound to honor them to hold
office.All who respect the State should be required to show respect
to them.For those others of us who see them in the loving sence,
should do all we can to spread this understanding to others, that
this Religio may inspire the world.
>
> In The Gods!
> Appius Galerius Aurelianus
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 57780 From: Gaius Petronius Dexter Date: 2008-09-26
Subject: Re: Roman priests and State religion
C. Petronius M. Moravio s.p.d.,
 
Yes, there are many forms of love, but I do not call "love" my respect and my worship in the gods and goddesses. They are not my friends, they are more than that. They are wonders and powers. And love in gods is not a prior, a preliminary or a precondition to be religious or to have spiritual feelings, as seems to say Galerius.
 
I made some researchs about the god Portunus with a great enthusiasm that I would not call love, but respect, curiosity and amazement.
 
On 292 quotes of Varro "Antiquitates rerum humanarum et divinarum" once the word amor (love) is used, about love between Anna (the sister of Dido) and Aeneas. Here is the quote : "Varro ait, non Didonem, sed Annam amore Aeneae impulsam se supra rogum interemisse." "Varro said that she was not Dido but Anna, pushed by her love for Aeneas, who perished on the pyre." 
 
On all those quotes from the scholar Varro about the human and divine things, he used the word of love only about the love affair between Aeneas and Dido the Queen of Carthage. Varro wrote that and died before the Aeneid of Virgil was published. 
 
Of course the goddess Venus, is the exception, because she is the goddess of love. If you are a cultor of Venus, indeed you are a lover. Catullus, Ovid, Tibullus and Propertius are the perfect examples of. But, like you showed in the today message quoting the de rerum Natura, Lucretius, which had not a reputation for being a lover, is actually a glowing poet in his hymn to Venus.
 
NB: Varro was a great Latin scholar, but, if I am not wrong, he was not a sacerdos nor an augur. Cicero was an augur. I am almost sure that the Cicero's cynism toward the gods was an insult against him said by his enemies, like Marcus Antonius or Augustus, but, in fact, he was free and sometimes pleasant or humoristic. But who has written in Latin the best reflexions, the best philosophical questions about the gods? (De natura deorum, de divinatione...) Cicero himself. It is right that Cicero uses his mind of contradiction in the books de Divinatione (It is the formel  philosophical discussion) and do not participate at the dialog "de natura deorum" but you close these books without the feelings that it were cynical works. Cicero mostly seems wondering about these vast questions.
 
The stoic philosopher Q. Lucilius Balbus opinion about the best cultus deorum:
"Quos deos et venerari et colere debemus, cultus autem deorum est optumus idemque castissimus atque sanctissimus plenissimusque pietatis, ut eos semper pura integra incorrupta et mente et voce veneremur. Non enim philosophi solum verum etiam maiores nostri superstitionem a religione separaverunt." (Cicero de Natura deorum, II, 71) "We must revere and worship the gods, and the best "cultus doerum" is the most sacred, the most holy and the most full of dutifulness, in order to adorn them always with pure, whole and uncorrupted mind and word. Not only the philosophers but also our ancestors divided the superstitio from the religio."
 
It is this way that I follow with the gods and goddesses.
 
Vale.
 
C. Petronius Dexter
 
 
 
----- Message d'origine -----
De : marcushoratius <MHoratius@...>
À : Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Envoyé le : Vendredi, 26 Septembre 2008, 14h57mn 21s
Objet : [Nova-Roma] Re: Roman priests and State religion

M. Moravius C. Petroni et omnibus s. p. d. :

"The religious man," according to Varro, "reveres the Gods as he
would his parents, for They are good, more apt to spare than to
punish."

There are many forms of love, and there are many Gods and Goddesses. 
I don't believe anyone can make generalities here. 

Venus, the Goddess of Love, must be wooed like a lover.  Today we may
see only the statues of marble or bronze, or perhaps like the Venus
of Antioch a statue of silver.  Recall that these were once painted,
adorned in gold jewelry, and perhaps also dressed.  Ovid, for one,
speaks about bringing Her presents in the same way as one courts his
mistress, and thus adorn Her statues with necklaces and braclets -
just as was found on the Venus of Antioch.  There are references,
too, of the statues, at least some, being dressed in garments.  In
one example, Juno Capitolina is said to have been presented with a
special mantle embroidered by the matrons of Rome and I don't think
that you can discount the possibility that it was used to dress a
statue of Her.

Juno is approached in a different way than one would approach Venus,
for trinkets and gifts alone do not sway Her.  You might call it
love, but it is not the same kind of love to offer Juno as one might
Venus. 

Now Jupiter one may see as a fatherly figure and thus love Him as one
would an ideal Father.  But I recall, too, how Seneca spoke about
women lulling about the Capitolium, firmly convinced that Jupiter had
taken them as His lovers.  Well, He was known to do so on occasion.
Diana, Proserpina, and Venus took mortal lovers from time to time,
too.  Apollo chased after several women but never seemed to have much
luck with the girls.  But then Silvanus, Neptunus, and Mars, not
exactly known as loving Gods still had Their gentler moments. 

Varro also said, "the Gods do not want sacrifice, Their statues even
less."  A perfunctary performance of a ritual, without any feeling,
is simply not acceptable. Even Cicero, known for his cynical
attitudes toward religion, speaks to the requirement of mental
attitude in approaching the Gods, and that material gifts are less
important (De Legibus 2.8.19; 2.10.24). 

The Lares are your ancestors, and I generally advise that people
approach their Lares, speak to them and treat them, in the same
manner as you would your grandparents.  I have no interest in playing
Ganymede to Jupiter.  Instead I see Him as a Father and love and
admire Him as I do my own father.  With a certain Goddess, not Venus,
I have had an experience which, for a lack of better words, might be
described as erotic love.  Then for Juno, I didn't really come to
appreciate Her until I entered the latter half of my life, and I
would describe my feelings for Her as love, a very mature kind of
love and not the kind one might have towards a mistress.  With Ceres
I have had a relationship for as long as I can remember, as Ferentina
is my family's Lar familiaris, and my thoughts towards Her has always
been as love towards a Mother.  And next would have to be Mars, with
whom I have had a relationship for over fifty years now.  My family
offered me into His service when I was four.  He has been my patron, 
I wouldn't describe Him as friend, or describe our relationship in
terms of brotherly love.  Then in my family's tradition there is a
Goddess whose name might be translated as "Most Mother," but who is
more like Hecate or Nemesis, or even like Juno on a bad day.  She is
very instructive, and can be helpful, but I wouldn't recommend
approaching Her in any manner but with the utmost respect.  Other
deities have been important at different times of my life - Neptunus
when I was a teen, and so forth - so that I have various
relationships with various Gods and Goddesses.  They are a community
of Gods, and there is a community of men and Gods.  So our
relationships with Them shall vary as we also have with members of
our human community.  Some we may meet only briefly. Some never at
all.  With others we may become very close, even in a relationship
that may be described as a form of love.

Many Gods and Goddesses, lesser gods and goddesses, nymphae, fauni,
silvani, Manes.  Many different people who relate to the Gods, each
in their own way to each in His or Her own way.  I don't think anyone
can offer us a generalization of what is correct in all circumstances
or for all cultores Deorum, or for all of the Gods and Goddesses. 
Like "love" the word "worship" can have different connotations and
levels of meaning.  As cultores we offer "worship" as that is what
the name means, and "worship" can imply a level of love, too.  For
only a supperstitious man would "worship" a God he fears. Respect,
adoration, sense of duty, pride in tradition are all part of offering
worship, too.  If you go through the ancient texts I think you find
that these mental attitudes are what the Maiores believed was most
important in offering worship.  What you sacrifice, what words you
speak, what motions you go through in performing a ritual have no
significance without the proper mental attitude.  Call it love or
something else, it is our social bonds with the Gods, our mutual
relationships rather than contractual arrangements that are most
important to maintaing the Pax Deorum for ourselves. 

Valete et vadete in pace Deorum


--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Gaius Petronius Dexter"
<jfarnoud94@...> wrote:
>
>
> C.
Petronius App. Galerio s.p.d.,
>
> Love. What our love does with
the gods and the goddesses? In my
opinion, gods and goddesses do not care about our love in them and
certainly prefer to be worshipped. The respect towards the gods is
not to love them but to respect the rituals of our worship in them.
They are countless and who loves everybody loves nobody.
>
> In addition, I am very cautious with the term of love
in the
religions, so many peoples indeed have suffered with all
these "religions of love" and have burned in the faggots of the
Inquisition's love. Because the love in god often hides the hatred in
mankind. God is so perfect, men are so imperfect, are not they?
>
> Fortunately the
religio Romana does not work on this scheme.
>
> Vale.
>
> C. Petronius Dexter
>
>
> ----- Message d'origine
-----
> De : Robert Levee <galerius_of_rome@...>
> À :
href="mailto:Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com" ymailto="mailto:Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com">Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
>
Envoyé le : Jeudi, 25 Septembre 2008, 22h12mn 25s
> Objet : Re:
[Nova-Roma] Roman priests and State religion
>
> Salve,
> I
must agree with you Claudio,our GODS truly need to be loved and
not relegated to ritual who's only meaning is a contractual
arrangement, absent of love for them.There are many who do not see
them as a focal point in their lives, and that is fine for those who
are officials of the State, who are bound to honor them to hold
office.All who respect the State should be required to show respect
to them.For those others of us who see them in the loving sence,
should do all we can to spread this understanding to others, that
this Religio may inspire the world.
>
> In The
Gods!
> Appius Galerius
Aurelianus
>



------------------------------------

Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    mailto:Nova-Roma-digest@yahoogroups.com
    mailto:Nova-Roma-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/


Group: Nova-Roma Message: 57781 From: Titus Flavius Aquila Date: 2008-09-26
Subject: AW: [Nova-Roma] Re: Roman priests and State religion

Salvete Quirites,

 

thanks to the Gods of Rome there is no orthodoxy in paganism, but a great freedom.
 
You can decide for yourself, who prefers to love, and who just would like to follow rituals.
 
I am sure the immortal Gods will understand any way chosen to worship them.
 
Optime valete
Titus Flavius Aquila
Tribunus Plebis Nova Roma
Legatus Pro Praetore Nova Roma
Scriba Censoris KBFM
Collegium sodalitas proDIIS
 
  

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Sie sind Spam leid? Yahoo! Mail verfügt über einen herausragenden Schutz gegen Massenmails.
http://mail.yahoo.com
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 57782 From: Publius Memmius Albucius Date: 2008-09-26
Subject: Re: Romans and State religion
Memmius Petronio Moravio omn.que s.d.


Some misunderstandings may come from the meaning of the modern words
we use to describe the relation btw humans and gods.

The notion of 'love' or 'adoration' has increased during Low Empire
and developed since. It is interesting to note that Romans did not
use that much these kind of words, like the word 'amor', also.

Your Balbus' quotation, Dexter, is characteristic, and even more
interesting with its English translation, specially when put in
parallel with Latin and another language, for ex. French.
We have the following equivalences:
"revere and worship" = "venerari et colere"= [Fr. 1935] "vénérer,
leur rendre un culte"
"veneremur" = "(we)adorn" (sic!) =[Fr. 1935]"(pour que) ce culte".

Even if "venerari" comes from Venus, "venerari", like "veneratio"
or "venia" seem not containing any 'love' contents. I have no Latin-
English dictionary available, but I cannot find any in a Latin-French
one. If we have a look on the "colere" (inf. verb), it is the same
statement. Colere have the same etym. root than... the wheel: it is
about turning and circulation. So Romans would use "colere" in the
meaning of living, caring about their fields, and also about friends,
virtues, studies, and their gods too. We see there rather a notion of
very mechanical regular movement and continuity (ritual) than the
love as we nowadays live it.
In French, "colere" is translated by 'honorer', 'rendre un
culte', 'pratiquer avec respect', 'accomplir des sacrifices', all
about cult, respect and ritual. The 'cult' comes from French 'culte',
which comes itself from... 'colere'.
"Venerari", is given by 'révérer', 'vénérer', 'honorer', with the
same common element, the great respect.
We can find the same meaning in German ('verehren') with a '-ehr-'
root that has the 'respect-honor' meaning.

What is funny, is that German and Latin words for "the one
who 'venerate'" takes a light pejorative connotation in both german
and french, and is translated in French by 'adorer', whose Latin
source (adorare) seems just 'to address prayers to a god'. History
has passed here between Ancient Rome and us.

Back to 'worship' (old saw. 'weord-scipe'): it is the "condition of
being worthy, honor, renown".

Religio romana seems well being first, in itself, a matter of duty,
ritual, and respect, therefore also a matter of fear (even with
Venus, let us see the ambivalence of the relation with Venus).

But from the moment the duties and the rituals are made and well
made, specially with the concentration, application and sincerity
evoked by you, Pont. Moravi, or you, Dexter, the gods are supposed to
be satisfied, and our Roman world steady.

Valete ambo et omnes,


P. Memmius Albucius


--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Gaius Petronius Dexter"
<jfarnoud94@...> wrote:
>
> C. Petronius M. Moravio s.p.d.,
>
> Yes, there are many forms of love, but I do not call "love" my
respect and my worship in the gods and goddesses. They are not my
friends, they are more than that. They are wonders and powers. And
love in gods is not a prior, a preliminary or a precondition to be
religious or to have spiritual feelings, as seems to say Galerius.
>
> I made some researchs about the god Portunus with a great
enthusiasm that I would not call love, but respect, curiosity and
amazement.
>
> On 292 quotes of Varro "Antiquitates rerum humanarum et divinarum"
once the word amor (love) is used, about love between Anna (the
sister of Dido) and Aeneas. Here is the quote : "Varro ait, non
Didonem, sed Annam amore Aeneae impulsam se supra rogum
interemisse." "Varro said that she was not Dido but Anna, pushed by
her love for Aeneas, who perished on the pyre."
>
> On all those quotes from the scholar Varro about the human and
divine things, he used the word of love only about the love affair
between Aeneas and Dido the Queen of Carthage. Varro wrote that and
died before the Aeneid of Virgil was published.
>
> Of course the goddess Venus, is the exception, because she is the
goddess of love. If you are a cultor of Venus, indeed you are a
lover. Catullus, Ovid, Tibullus and Propertius are the perfect
examples of. But, like you showed in the today message quoting the de
rerum Natura, Lucretius, which had not a reputation for being a
lover, is actually a glowing poet in his hymn to Venus.
>
> NB: Varro was a great Latin scholar, but, if I am not wrong, he was
not a sacerdos nor an augur. Cicero was an augur. I am almost sure
that the Cicero's cynism toward the gods was an insult against him
said by his enemies, like Marcus Antonius or Augustus, but, in fact,
he was free and sometimes pleasant or humoristic. But who has written
in Latin the best reflexions, the best philosophical questions about
the gods? (De natura deorum, de divinatione...) Cicero himself. It is
right that Cicero uses his mind of contradiction in the books de
Divinatione (It is the formel philosophical discussion) and do not
participate at the dialog "de natura deorum" but you close these
books without the feelings that it were cynical works. Cicero mostly
seems wondering about these vast questions.
>
> The stoic philosopher Q. Lucilius Balbus opinion about the best
cultus deorum:
> "Quos deos et venerari et colere debemus, cultus autem deorum est
optumus idemque castissimus atque sanctissimus plenissimusque
pietatis, ut eos semper pura integra incorrupta et mente et voce
veneremur. Non enim philosophi solum verum etiam maiores nostri
superstitionem a religione separaverunt." (Cicero de Natura deorum,
II, 71) "We must revere and worship the gods, and the best "cultus
doerum" is the most sacred, the most holy and the most full of
dutifulness, in order to adorn them always with pure, whole and
uncorrupted mind and word. Not only the philosophers but also our
ancestors divided the superstitio from the religio."
>
> It is this way that I follow with the gods and goddesses.
>
> Vale.
>
> C. Petronius Dexter
>
>
>
> ----- Message d'origine -----
> De : marcushoratius <MHoratius@...>
> À : Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> Envoyé le : Vendredi, 26 Septembre 2008, 14h57mn 21s
> Objet : [Nova-Roma] Re: Roman priests and State religion
>
> M. Moravius C. Petroni et omnibus s. p. d. :
>
> "The religious man," according to Varro, "reveres the Gods as he
> would his parents, for They are good, more apt to spare than to
> punish."
>
> There are many forms of love, and there are many Gods and
Goddesses.
> I don't believe anyone can make generalities here.
>
> Venus, the Goddess of Love, must be wooed like a lover. Today we
may
> see only the statues of marble or bronze, or perhaps like the Venus
> of Antioch a statue of silver. Recall that these were once
painted,
> adorned in gold jewelry, and perhaps also dressed. Ovid, for one,
> speaks about bringing Her presents in the same way as one courts
his
> mistress, and thus adorn Her statues with necklaces and braclets -
> just as was found on the Venus of Antioch. There are references,
> too, of the statues, at least some, being dressed in garments. In
> one example, Juno Capitolina is said to have been presented with a
> special mantle embroidered by the matrons of Rome and I don't think
> that you can discount the possibility that it was used to dress a
> statue of Her.
>
> Juno is approached in a different way than one would approach
Venus,
> for trinkets and gifts alone do not sway Her. You might call it
> love, but it is not the same kind of love to offer Juno as one
might
> Venus.
>
> Now Jupiter one may see as a fatherly figure and thus love Him as
one
> would an ideal Father. But I recall, too, how Seneca spoke about
> women lulling about the Capitolium, firmly convinced that Jupiter
had
> taken them as His lovers. Well, He was known to do so on occasion.
> Diana, Proserpina, and Venus took mortal lovers from time to time,
> too. Apollo chased after several women but never seemed to have
much
> luck with the girls. But then Silvanus, Neptunus, and Mars, not
> exactly known as loving Gods still had Their gentler moments.
>
> Varro also said, "the Gods do not want sacrifice, Their statues
even
> less." A perfunctary performance of a ritual, without any feeling,
> is simply not acceptable. Even Cicero, known for his cynical
> attitudes toward religion, speaks to the requirement of mental
> attitude in approaching the Gods, and that material gifts are less
> important (De Legibus 2.8.19; 2.10.24).
>
> The Lares are your ancestors, and I generally advise that people
> approach their Lares, speak to them and treat them, in the same
> manner as you would your grandparents. I have no interest in
playing
> Ganymede to Jupiter. Instead I see Him as a Father and love and
> admire Him as I do my own father. With a certain Goddess, not
Venus,
> I have had an experience which, for a lack of better words, might
be
> described as erotic love. Then for Juno, I didn't really come to
> appreciate Her until I entered the latter half of my life, and I
> would describe my feelings for Her as love, a very mature kind of
> love and not the kind one might have towards a mistress. With
Ceres
> I have had a relationship for as long as I can remember, as
Ferentina
> is my family's Lar familiaris, and my thoughts towards Her has
always
> been as love towards a Mother. And next would have to be Mars,
with
> whom I have had a relationship for over fifty years now. My family
> offered me into His service when I was four. He has been my
patron,
> I wouldn't describe Him as friend, or describe our relationship in
> terms of brotherly love. Then in my family's tradition there is a
> Goddess whose name might be translated as "Most Mother," but who is
> more like Hecate or Nemesis, or even like Juno on a bad day. She
is
> very instructive, and can be helpful, but I wouldn't recommend
> approaching Her in any manner but with the utmost respect. Other
> deities have been important at different times of my life -
Neptunus
> when I was a teen, and so forth - so that I have various
> relationships with various Gods and Goddesses. They are a
community
> of Gods, and there is a community of men and Gods. So our
> relationships with Them shall vary as we also have with members of
> our human community. Some we may meet only briefly. Some never at
> all. With others we may become very close, even in a relationship
> that may be described as a form of love.
>
> Many Gods and Goddesses, lesser gods and goddesses, nymphae, fauni,
> silvani, Manes. Many different people who relate to the Gods, each
> in their own way to each in His or Her own way. I don't think
anyone
> can offer us a generalization of what is correct in all
circumstances
> or for all cultores Deorum, or for all of the Gods and Goddesses.
> Like "love" the word "worship" can have different connotations and
> levels of meaning. As cultores we offer "worship" as that is what
> the name means, and "worship" can imply a level of love, too. For
> only a supperstitious man would "worship" a God he fears. Respect,
> adoration, sense of duty, pride in tradition are all part of
offering
> worship, too. If you go through the ancient texts I think you find
> that these mental attitudes are what the Maiores believed was most
> important in offering worship. What you sacrifice, what words you
> speak, what motions you go through in performing a ritual have no
> significance without the proper mental attitude. Call it love or
> something else, it is our social bonds with the Gods, our mutual
> relationships rather than contractual arrangements that are most
> important to maintaing the Pax Deorum for ourselves.
>
> Valete et vadete in pace Deorum
>
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Gaius Petronius Dexter"
> <jfarnoud94@> wrote:
> >
> >
> > C. Petronius App. Galerio s.p.d.,
> >
> > Love. What our love does with the gods and the goddesses? In my
> opinion, gods and goddesses do not care about our love in them and
> certainly prefer to be worshipped. The respect towards the gods is
> not to love them but to respect the rituals of our worship in them.
> They are countless and who loves everybody loves nobody.
> >
> > In addition, I am very cautious with the term of love in the
> religions, so many peoples indeed have suffered with all
> these "religions of love" and have burned in the faggots of the
> Inquisition's love. Because the love in god often hides the hatred
in
> mankind. God is so perfect, men are so imperfect, are not they?
> >
> > Fortunately the religio Romana does not work on this scheme.
> >
> > Vale.
> >
> > C. Petronius Dexter
> >
> >
> > ----- Message d'origine -----
> > De : Robert Levee <galerius_of_rome@>
> > À : Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> > Envoyé le : Jeudi, 25 Septembre 2008, 22h12mn 25s
> > Objet : Re: [Nova-Roma] Roman priests and State religion
> >
> > Salve,
> > I must agree with you Claudio,our GODS truly need to be loved and
> not relegated to ritual who's only meaning is a contractual
> arrangement, absent of love for them.There are many who do not see
> them as a focal point in their lives, and that is fine for those
who
> are officials of the State, who are bound to honor them to hold
> office.All who respect the State should be required to show respect
> to them.For those others of us who see them in the loving sence,
> should do all we can to spread this understanding to others, that
> this Religio may inspire the world.
> >
> > In The Gods!
> > Appius Galerius Aurelianus
> >
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 57783 From: Cases Livia Date: 2008-09-26
Subject: Re: Roman priests and State religion
Salve Galeri Aureliane,
I see other people already replied properly to your accusations. I'd just add that you should try to read and understand posts before replying.
I did that with Guzzo's post: I just didn't succeed in understanding it. Since I never had this problem when talking with him in Italian, I suspected his English is bad. But mine shouldn't be so terrible as to totally misunderstand my post.
My co-religionists are the practicers of Religio Romana, but I respect the practicers of other religions too (well, except the monotheists - I tend to lose my patience with those after a while).

Vale,
L. Livia Plauta



Robert Levee <galerius_of_rome@...> írta:

Salve, A. Livia Plauta

I must say, that to accuse Claudio to be mentally deranged because he believes in the Gods and Goddesses of Roma, is very rude and actually, if memory serves me right a direct violation of our codes of conduct, here in Nova Roma aa pertains to the conversations posted to our board.I would advise you to treat the feelings of those whom are practitioners of the Religio Romana, with the same respect as you do with your co-religionists. To seek a better understanding of the Religio Romana would be a most welcome turn of events.

In The Gods!
Appius Galeriusd Aurelianus

--- On Thu, 9/25/08, Cases Livia <cases@freemail. hu> wrote:

> From: Cases Livia <cases@freemail. hu>
> Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Roman priests and State religion
> To: Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com
> Date: Thursday, September 25, 2008, 4:24 PM
> Salve Claudio,
> your posts recently don't make any sense (really, I
> couldn't understand the last one, even after reading it
> twice). This might be because your English is bad, but be
> careful, because you are giving the impression of being
> mentally deranged.
>
> Claudio, i tuoi post su questa lista di recente non hanno
> né capo né coda (davvero, non ho capito niente, neanche
> rileggendo). Forse ŕ10D perché non sai abbastanza inglese, ma
> stai attento, perché dai l'impressione di essere
> squilibrato mentalmente.
>
> Vale,
> L. Livia Plauta
>
>
>
> "Avv. Claudio Guzzo"
> <claudio.guzzo@ email.it> írta:
>
>
> >
> >
> > Salve. Religio romana was, during the Roman ages loved
> by novaromans, christian too. Now there are roman priests
> and State religion in Vatican City and there are a lot of
> christian (i.e. roman) religions in the world: new roman
> (state) religions. If you write religio romana and think
> cultus deorum, there are too many religions now: Roma
> (civil nature) and her Gods don't need a new religion,
> but to be loved. Vale ACC
> >
> >
>
> ____________ _________ _________ _________ _________ _________ _
> Olcsó repülőjegyet mindenkinek!
> Repjegyek a legjobb napi áron akár BBP és sztornó
> biztosítással is.
> repulojegy.budavart ours.hu




________________________________________________________
Olcsó repülőjegyet mindenkinek! Repjegyek a legjobb napi áron akár BBP és sztornó biztosítással is. repulojegy.budavartours.hu
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 57784 From: Robert Levee Date: 2008-09-26
Subject: Re: Roman priests and State religion
Salve,

I apologize if I in fact misunderstood your post.I felt I had read it with what I thought was perfect clarity.Perhaps there was some hidden meaning or some inside joke that I am not aware of,I am unaware of other posts this person has made, that had others complaining as to the sence behind his words.I must agree for the most part, many of the statements he made in that post were incomprehensible to me as well.I still feel however, that I was being honest in my perception, that you may have been a little rough on him by implying that others might see him as mentally deranged.Even though that may be the reality of the situation or a language barrier problem.Either way, I regret having been so aggressive in my responce to your post.I would like nothing more, than to see all practicers of the Religio Romana, living in harmony and respectful relations, irregardless as to their level of understanding, or the form in which they approach the Gods of Rome.

Vale,
Appius Galerius Aurelianus


--- On Fri, 9/26/08, Cases Livia <cases@...> wrote:

> From: Cases Livia <cases@...>
> Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Roman priests and State religion
> To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> Date: Friday, September 26, 2008, 5:25 PM
> Salve Galeri Aureliane,
> I see other people already replied properly to your
> accusations. I'd just add that you should try to read
> and understand posts before replying.
> I did that with Guzzo's post: I just didn't succeed
> in understanding it. Since I never had this problem when
> talking with him in Italian, I suspected his English is bad.
> But mine shouldn't be so terrible as to totally
> misunderstand my post.
> My co-religionists are the practicers of Religio Romana,
> but I respect the practicers of other religions too (well,
> except the monotheists - I tend to lose my patience with
> those after a while).
>
> Vale,
> L. Livia Plauta
>
>
>
> Robert Levee <galerius_of_rome@...> írta:
>
>
> > Salve, A. Livia Plauta
> >
> > I must say, that to accuse Claudio to be mentally
> deranged because he believes in the Gods and Goddesses of
> Roma, is very rude and actually, if memory serves me right a
> direct violation of our codes of conduct, here in Nova Roma
> aa pertains to the conversations posted to our board.I would
> advise you to treat the feelings of those whom are
> practitioners of the Religio Romana, with the same respect
> as you do with your co-religionists.To seek a better
> understanding of the Religio Romana would be a most welcome
> turn of events.
> >
> > In The Gods!
> > Appius Galeriusd Aurelianus
> >
> > --- On Thu, 9/25/08, Cases Livia
> <cases@...> wrote:
> >
> > > From: Cases Livia <cases@...>
> > > Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Roman priests and State
> religion
> > > To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> > > Date: Thursday, September 25, 2008, 4:24 PM
> > > Salve Claudio,
> > > your posts recently don't make any sense
> (really, I
> > > couldn't understand the last one, even after
> reading it
> > > twice). This might be because your English is
> bad, but be
> > > careful, because you are giving the impression
> of being
> > > mentally deranged.
> > >
> > > Claudio, i tuoi post su questa lista di recente
> non hanno
> > > né capo né coda (davvero, non ho capito
> niente, neanche
> > > rileggendo). Forse ŕ10D perché non sai
> abbastanza inglese, ma
> > > stai attento, perché dai l'impressione di
> essere
> > > squilibrato mentalmente.
> > >
> > > Vale,
> > > L. Livia Plauta
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > "Avv. Claudio Guzzo"
> > > <claudio.guzzo@...> írta:
> > >
> > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Salve. Religio romana was, during the Roman
> ages loved
> > > by novaromans, christian too. Now there are
> roman priests
> > > and State religion in Vatican City and there
> are a lot of
> > > christian (i.e. roman) religions in the world:
> new roman
> > > (state) religions. If you write religio romana
> and think
> > > cultus deorum, there are too many religions
> now: Roma
> > > (civil nature) and her Gods don't need a
> new religion,
> > > but to be loved. Vale ACC
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> __________________________________________________________
> > > Olcsó repülőjegyet mindenkinek!
> > > Repjegyek a legjobb napi áron akár BBP és
> sztornó
> > > biztosítással is.
> > > repulojegy.budavartours.hu
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
> Olcsó repülőjegyet mindenkinek!
> Repjegyek a legjobb napi áron akár BBP és sztornó
> biztosítással is.
> repulojegy.budavartours.hu
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 57785 From: Gaius Petronius Dexter Date: 2008-09-27
Subject: Thanks.
C. Petronius omnibus Quiritibus et optimis Censoribus s.p.d.,
 
What a great pleasure came in me! What citizen born with me! ["Qualis civis nascor!"(More pleasant than: Qualis artifex pereo.)]. By our Censores, gods bless them, I at last am registered on a tribe and a century. So now I can feel me being a true citizen. I will vote with other citizens. I am like these young men wearing the virilis toga and registered by the Censores into the tribes and the centuries on the Capitole Hill in front of the Temple of Jupiter Maximus Optimus.
 
I am so happy that, for the first time, facing my Lararium that I still built, I did an adoration following the using written in Nova Roma site :
 
"If you prefer to make things more solemn (specially when you are about to offer a more solemn sacrifice, or when you approach a relative's grave), with the head covered, approach the altar, statue, lararium, grave, etc.. Then take your right hand to your lips for a kiss and rotate all your body. Your rotation finishes in your original position facing the sacred spot, so that you can proceed with your ritual."
 
And of course, on the March 17th next I will sacrifice to Liber.
 
Utinam Novae Romae omnia prospere contingant et dei deaeque nobis faveant! 
(Do Roma Nova thrive and gods bless us!)
 
Valete.
 
C. Petronius Dexter
 
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 57786 From: Q. Caecilius Metellus Date: 2008-09-27
Subject: Re: Roman priests and State religion
Q. Caecilius Metellus C. Petronio Dextro salutem.

I believe that your quote of Balbus (courtesy of Cicero) best captures my
thoughts on the Cultus Deorum as well, as was restated by my colleague M.
Moravius. I think your use of the word "loved" in your original posting may
have improperly stated what you meant, which is the likely cause of the
confusion thus far.

Indeed, it is not necessarily a 'love' that need be felt toward the Gods
(specifically in our context; even in other contexts, such as a Judaic context
or an Islamic context), but that respect you mentioned in a later posting. It
is, to some extents, very similar to the familial respect which M. Moravius
mentions; I might be more inclined to liken it more to the relationship an
employee might have with one's supervisor. By that, specifically, I mean that
it is possible to dislike a divinity, yet still respect its superiority over
oneself, and treat it accordingly.

Of course, all this is not to mean that the Gods are not to be loved, in the
sense that M. Moravius mentions. Indeed, overall, they should be so, although
it may not necessarily be the case that any one individual love all the Gods, or
love them in a specific fashion. I can not say that I "love" Juno, though I
certainly have no disrespect for Her whatsoever. However, I can say that I love
Ceres, in much the same way as one would a mother, and in my prayers to Ceres, I
speak to Her as such, and, paternally, for Apollo. Minerva I treat similarly to
an elder sister (though I do not argue with Her as I did my elder sisters :)).

In all cases, I think, what is pivotal is what I might call 'pietas sacra', that
is to say, that sacred piety that compels one to respect and care for the Gods,
just as there is the piety which one ought to have for one's friends and family.
Individually, we will necessarily all do this in different forms, perhaps
under different names, using different means. Of lesser importance is the means
by which we do it; it is more important that it is done, and in a manner
acceptable to, and respectful of, the Divine, in whatever form(s) that may be.

Quintus Caecilius Metellus Postumianus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 57787 From: marcushoratius Date: 2008-09-27
Subject: a. d. V Kalendas Octobres: Cloelia and Valeria
M. Moravius Piscinus cultoribus Deorum et omnibus salutem plurimam
dicit: Venus nos complectatur dulce.

Hodie est ante diem V Kalendas Octobres; haec dies comitialis est:
Haedi exoriuntur, Favonius, nonnumquam Auster cum pluvial.

With the rise of the Kids comes the favorable winds of Favonius, or
sometimes Auster with rains.


The Flaminica Dialis

Like the Flamen Dialis, there were some restrictions placed on the
Flaminica Dialis. She alone was to weave the cloth used to make the
robes of the flamen Dialis and these had to be done in a special way
so that the ends were not knotted. Beginning on 1 March, "the girded
wife of the peak-capped Flamen Dialishas to keep her hair free from
the comb (P. Ovidius Naso, Fasti 3.393-394)." This would indicate
that she had to wear her hair down, as when in mourning, whereas she
normally had her hair combed up in a special way in a conical form.
Through the month of March, from the Kalends until the last
performance of the Salii priests of Mars no marriages could be
performed, or at least no rites of confarreatio as the Flaminica
Dialis was not available to attend. Again in June, "Then it was
pointed out to me that after the Ides of June was a good time for
brides, and for bridegrooms, while the start of the month was
unsuitable for marriage: for the holy Flamenica Dialis told
me: 'Till the calm Tiber carries the sweepings from the shrine of
Ilian Vesta, on its yellow waves to the sea, I'm not allowed to comb
my hair with a toothed comb, nor to cut my nails with anything made
of iron, nor to touch my husband, though he's Jove's priest, and
though he was given to me by law for life (P. Ovidius Naso, Fasti
6.223-232).'"


The Bravery of Cloelia and Valeria

"In the city where Cloelia, who braved both the enemy and the river
has been almost transferred by us, on account of her signal courage,
to the list of heroes: the statue of Cloelia, mounted upon a horse,
stands on the Sacred Way in the city's busiest quarter, and, as our
young coxcombs mount to their cushioned seats, she taunts them with
journeying in such a fashion in a city in which even women have been
presented with a horse!" ~ L. Annaeus Seneca, De Consolatione ad
Marciam 16.2

Livy briefly tells the story behind the equestrian statue of Cloelia:

"The Etruscan camp was situated not far from the river, and the
maiden Cloelia, one of the hostages, escaped, unobserved, through the
guards and at the head of her sister hostages swam across the river
amidst a shower of javelins and restored them all safe to their
relatives. When the news of this incident reached him, the king was
at first exceedingly angry and sent to demand the surrender of
Cloelia; the others he did not care about. Afterwards his feelings
changed to admiration; he said that the exploit surpassed those of
Cocles and Mucius, and announced that whilst on the one hand he
should consider the treaty broken if she were not surrendered, he
would on the other hand, if she were surrendered, send her back to
her people unhurt. Both sides behaved honorably; the Romans
surrendered her as a pledge of loyalty to the terms of the treaty;
the Etruscan king showed that with him courage was not only safe but
honored, and after eulogizing the girl's conduct, told her that he
would make her a present of half the remaining hostages, she was to
choose whom she would. It is said that after all had been brought
before her, she chose the boys of tender age; a choice in keeping
with maidenly modesty, and one approved by the hostages themselves,
since they felt that the age which was most liable to ill-treatment
should have the preference in being rescued from hostile hands. After
peace was thus re-established, the Romans rewarded the unprecedented
courage shown by a woman by an unprecedented honor, namely an
equestrian statue. On the highest part of the Sacred Way a statue was
erected representing the maiden sitting on horseback." ~ Titus Livius
2.13

Other versions of the story can be found with Valerius Maximus,
Dionysius of Halicarnassus, Polyaenus, and two versions by Plutarch,
of which this is one:

"The two things that brought about the expulsion of Tarquinius
Superbus, seventh king of Rome from Romulus, were arrogance and the
virtue of Lucretia, a woman married to a distinguished man of royal
lineage. For she was outraged by one of Tarquin's sons who had been
welcomed as a guest in her home. She told her friends and family what
had been done to her, and immediately slew herself. Deposed from
power, Tarquin waged various wars in his endeavors to regain his
sovereignty. Finally he persuaded Porsena, ruler of the Etruscans, to
march against Rome with a great force. At the same time with the war
famine also attacked the Romans, and they, learning that Porsena was
not merely a great soldier but a just and fair man as well, wished to
make him judge in their case against Tarquin. But Tarquin was
stubborn, saying that Porsena, if he did not remain faithful as an
ally, would not be a just judge either; and so Porsena renounced him
and made it his endeavor that when he went away he should be a friend
of the Romans, and should get back such part of the land as they had
cut off from the Etruscans, and also the prisoners of war. To confirm
these terms hostages were given to him, ten youths and ten maidens,
among whom was Valeria, the daughter of Publicola the consul,
whereupon Porsena at once remitted all his preparation for the war,
although the agreement was not yet consummated.

"The maidens went down to the river as if to bathe, a short distance
away from the camp. At the instigation of one of them, Cloelia, they
fastened their clothes to their heads, and took the risk of breasting
a swift current and deep-whirling eddies, and by swimming close
together they reached the other side by dint of a hard struggle, and
with many a chance of failure. There are those who say that Cloelia
procured a horse and, mounting it, swam it across slowly, acting as
guide for the others, and encouraging and helping them as they were
swimming. The argument with which they support this I will mention in
a moment.

"When the Romans saw them safe and sound, they admired the maidens'
bravery and daring, yet did not like their coming back, nor could
endure to prove themselves less honorable than one man in keeping
faith. Accordingly they commanded the girls to go back again, and
sent men with them to see that they got there. Tarquin set an ambush
for these when they had crossed the river, and came very near getting
the maidens in his power. But Valeria, daughter of the consul,
Publicola, with three servants succeeded in escaping to the camp of
Porsena, and the others Porsena's son, Aruns, rescued from the enemy
by hastening with all speed to their assistance.

"When they were brought to camp, Porsena, with a look at them, bade
them say which one of them was the instigator and leader in the plan.
The others, for fear regarding Cloelia, said not a word; but Cloelia
of her own accord said that it was herself, and Porsena, in
admiration of her, ordered a horse to be brought, fittingly
caparisoned, and presented it to her, and sent them all back kindly
and humanely. Many make of this an indication that Cloelia rode
across the river on a horse. Others, however, say this is not so, but
that Porsena, because he admired her strength and daring as above
that of other women, deemed her worthy of a gift fitting for a
warrior. At all events, there stood an equestrian statue of a woman
close beside the Via Sacra, as it is called, and some say that this
is the statue of Cloelia, others of Valeria." ~ Plutarch, De Mulierum
Virtutibus 250


Today's thought comes from Epicurus, Vatican Sayings 77:

"Freedom is the greatest fruit of self-sufficiency."
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 57788 From: Lucia Livia Plauta Date: 2008-09-27
Subject: Re: Roman priests and State religion
Salve Aureliane,
no need to apologize so profusely now.
In fact I'm still surprised people apparently had such an easy way
undertanding Guzzo's message.
Let's have a look prase by phrase at why I find it uncomprehensible:

"Religio romana was, during the Roman ages loved by novaromans,
christian too. "

By "Roman ages" here I understand " ancient roman age", otherwise why
couldn't he write "the early times of Nova Roma" or something similar?
But novaromans (us) didn't exist then, so how could they love anything?

"Now there are roman priests and State religion in Vatican City and
there are a lot of christian (i.e. roman) religions in the world: new
roman (state) religions."

Here Guzzo seems to make an equivalence between roman religion and
christian religions. This is plain false. And except the catholics,
who are "roman" catholics, no other christian religion calls itself
roman. And there are no roman priests in Vatican City except those who
were born in Rome, but this is as irrelevant to the religio matter as
saying there are roman lawyers and doctors (of course!).

"If you write religio romana and think cultus deorum, there are too
many religions now: Roma (civil nature) and her Gods don't need a new
religion, but to be loved."

The first part of the sentence doesn't make sense because there aren't
many religions of cultus deorum. One might say there are many groups,
or sects that practice cultus deorum, but that doesn't mean that there
are many religions, and even for the groups "many" is a wild
exaggeration, as you can count them on one hand. In the second part of
the sentence I can't make any sense of "(civil nature)". Does he mean
"the civilian nature of Rome"? Would that make sense? "A new
religion". But who talked about new religion?

It seems people reacted to part of this last sentence, interpreting it
as "The Gods of Rome need to be loved". The discussion that followed
is actually very interesting, and perhaps demonstrates how the human
mind tends to create meaning even where there is none.

In fact, after this dissection, and considering Guzzo's previous post
where he suggested that Ratzinger be made pontifex maximus of Nova
Roma, I suspect his original meaning might have been something close
to this: "The roman catholic religion is sufficient as a roman
religion, so there is no need to practice cultus deorum: all you need
is to love the Gods".

Optime vale,
Livia


--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Robert Levee <galerius_of_rome@...>
wrote:
>
> Salve,
>
> I apologize if I in fact misunderstood your post.I felt I had read
it with what I thought was perfect clarity.Perhaps there was some
hidden meaning or some inside joke that I am not aware of,I am unaware
of other posts this person has made, that had others complaining as to
the sence behind his words.I must agree for the most part, many of the
statements he made in that post were incomprehensible to me as well.I
still feel however, that I was being honest in my perception, that you
may have been a little rough on him by implying that others might see
him as mentally deranged.Even though that may be the reality of the
situation or a language barrier problem.Either way, I regret having
been so aggressive in my responce to your post.I would like nothing
more, than to see all practicers of the Religio Romana, living in
harmony and respectful relations, irregardless as to their level of
understanding, or the form in which they approach the Gods of Rome.
>
> Vale,
> Appius Galerius Aurelianus
>
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 57789 From: Avv. Claudio Guzzo Date: 2008-09-28
Subject: roman priests and state religion
Salve.
If some novaroman doesn't love nature, culture and their gods, why should I be to blame?
what roman priests do they want to talk about or worship? what religion?
There is a list for talking about their "religio romana".
Sorry for my english.
P.S.: se qualche novaromano non ama la natura, la cultura e i loro dei, perché io sono da biasimare? di quali preti romani vogliono parlare o venerare? quale religione? C'è una lista per parlare della loro "superstizione romana".
Scusate il mio inglese
 
 
 
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 57790 From: Avv. Claudio Guzzo Date: 2008-09-28
Subject: religiones romanae?
Salve Livia!
You wrote:
"My co-religionists are the practicers of Religio Romana, but I respect the practicers of other religions too (well, except the monotheists - I tend to lose my patience with those after a while)."
 
What "religio romana" are you talking about? You look like those romans that fighted against christians or against pagans: who cares of a new civil(...)  war? A novaroman "lady" loves to write her hate against me and tell to others that I am a kind of naziskin, but she doesn't know me: I love Pax. 
Now, Livia should know that, there is a monotheist religio in Roma, there are its priests and its roman state-religion (Vatican City); that religion (its pontifex, Benedictus XVI) loves greek and roman culture and its priests have a roman common language (latin), some of its practicers were Roman Emperors (in the inspired age of NR) too; now, Catholic Church is the only religio romana.
There is a novaroman religion in a NR mailing list too, with an english common language and some "priests"; it is not roman, beacuse we can't live and practice a religion in Roma looking at a mail or giving our money to some american guru... if we are not insane or stupid!
Vale.
ACC
 

Vale,
L. Livia Plauta
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 57791 From: David Kling (Modianus) Date: 2008-09-28
Subject: Re: religiones romanae?
Then why do you remain in Nova Roma if you have so much disdain for it?

Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus

On Sun, Sep 28, 2008 at 7:23 AM, Avv. Claudio Guzzo <claudio.guzzo@...> wrote:

Salve Livia!
You wrote:
"My co-religionists are the practicers of Religio Romana, but I respect the practicers of other religions too (well, except the monotheists - I tend to lose my patience with those after a while)."
 
What "religio romana" are you talking about? You look like those romans that fighted against christians or against pagans: who cares of a new civil(...)  war? A novaroman "lady" loves to write her hate against me and tell to others that I am a kind of naziskin, but she doesn't know me: I love Pax. 
Now, Livia should know that, there is a monotheist religio in Roma, there are its priests and its roman state-religion (Vatican City); that religion (its pontifex, Benedictus XVI) loves greek and roman culture and its priests have a roman common language (latin), some of its practicers were Roman Emperors (in the inspired age of NR) too; now, Catholic Church is the only religio romana.
There is a novaroman religion in a NR mailing list too, with an english common language and some "priests"; it is not roman, beacuse we can't live and practice a religion in Roma looking at a mail or giving our money to some american guru... if we are not insane or stupid!
Vale.
ACC



Group: Nova-Roma Message: 57792 From: marcushoratius Date: 2008-09-28
Subject: a. d. IV Kalendas Octobres: Hercules, Pinarii, and Potitii
M. Moravius Piscinus cultoribus Deorum et omnibus salutem plurimam
dicit: Vos vivatis atque floreatis ad plurimos annos.

Hodie est ante diem IIII Kalendas Octobras; haec dies comitialis est:
Virgo desinit oriri, tempestatem significat.

Rise of the She-Goat, followed by the rise of her Kids on the
following evening (signals the approach of storms).

Legendary Origins of the Cultus Herculi of the Ara Maxima:

Following His victory over Cacus, Hercules erected an Altar to
Jupiter.

"It had been the habit before, that men gave up one tenth of their
productions to the king; but he (Hercules) said it seemed to him that
he had better give that same part to the Gods than to kings. Here
from then is clearly derived the habit of consecrating the tenth to
Hercules, according to what Plautus says in 'In the part of
Hercules', meaning the tenth (6.6)."

It was Carmentis, the mother of Evander, who taught Hercules through
song what sacred rites He should conduct at the Ara Maxima.

"After consecrating the Great altar and offering on it his tenth,
Recaranus (Hercules) ordained, because Carmentis was invited but not
present at that sacrifice, that no woman was allowed to eat from that
what was sacrificed on that altar: and from these holy things women
are completely removed (6.7)."

"So when Recaranus or Hercules had dedicated a massive altar to
(Jupiter) the Finding Father, he recruited two men from Italy,
Potitius and Pinarius, whom he could teach to manage the same rites
in a fixed ceremony. But of these men, Potitius, because he had come
earlier, was allowed to eat up the entrails, while Pinarius and his
descendants, for the very reason that he had come later, were
debarred. Hence this is observed nowadays too: Nobody of the family
of the Pinarii is permitted to eat at these rites. Some maintain
that they were first called by another name, and that it was really
afterwards that they were designated Pinarii - from 'peina'
(Gk: 'hungry') - because, clearly, they go away from sacrifices of
this sort unfed and for this reason hungry. And that custom
continued up until Appius Claudius the censor, with the people
performing the Potitiian rites also eating from the ox which they had
sacrificed, and from the point when they had left nothing remaining
the Pinarii were then admitted." ~ Sextus Aurelius Victor, Origo
Gentis Romanae 6.6-7; 8.1-4

It should be noted that the Pinarii, and women, were not barred from
the rituals, but only from sharing in the meal. It was actually part
of the cultus that they be present and not eat. But then Aurelius
tells us that the cultus was changed when it became a sacrum publica.

AUC 441 /312 BCE: Appius Claudius, the Potitii, and the Pinarii

"This year saw the famous censorship of Appius Claudius and Gaius
Plautius, though the reputation of Appius with later generations
rests mainly upon his public works, the Appian Way and the aqueduct
which bear his name. He carried out these undertakings single-handed,
for, owing to the odium he incurred by the way he revised the
senatorial lists and filled up the vacancies, his colleague,
thoroughly ashamed of his conduct, resigned. In the obstinate temper
which had always marked his house, Appius continued to hold office
alone. It was owing to his action that the Potitii, whose family had
always possessed the right of ministering at the Ara Maxima of
Hercules, transferred that duty to some temple servants, whom they
had instructed in the various observances. There is a strange
tradition connected with this, and one well calculated to create
religious scruples in the minds of any who would disturb the
established order of ceremonial usages. It is said that though when
the change was made there were twelve branches of the family of the
Potitii comprising thirty adults, not one member, old or young, was
alive twelve months later. Nor was the extinction of the Potitian
name the only consequence; Appius himself some years afterwards was
struck with blindness by the unforgetting wrath of the Gods." ~ Titus
Livius 9.29

Plutarch, Roman Questions 60: "Why, when there are two altars of
Hercules, do women receive no share nor taste of the sacrifices
offered on the larger altar?

"Is it because the friends of Carmenta came late for the rites, as
did also the clan of the Pinarii? Wherefore, as they were excluded
from the banquet while the rest were feasting, they acquired the name
Pinarii. Or is it because of the fable of Deianeira and the shirt?"

Deineira, wife of Hercules, had been tricked into believing that a
cloak was charmed and would make Him love only her. But after she
gave Him the cloak it was revealled that it was poisoned. Hercules
had His problems with women. Once, while drunken, He was seduced by
Auge, a virginal priestess who then gave birth to Telephos. He grew
up apart from his parents. Returning, he mistakenly slew his
grandfather and nearly married his mother Auge. It would be just as
reasonable to use such a myth to exclude women, or at least wives,
from some of Hercules festivities. Then there was the other myth on
how Hercules came to serve the Queen of the Amazons dressed as a
handmaiden. If Hercules demanded that men don women's clothing at
His rites, that too might have produced a rule to limit the
participation of women. It would not be strange to have men dressed
as women perform dance at a bawdy type of rite held exclusively for
men, and where the presence of women would be frowned upon.
Similarly to the myth of Hercules and the Amazons, there is this
tale, too:

Plutarch, Greek Questions 58: "Why is it that among the Coans the
priest of Hercules at Antimacheia dons a woman's dress, and fastens
upon his head a woman's headdress before he begins the sacrifice?

"Hercules, putting out with his six ships for Troy, encountered a
storm; and when his other ships had been destroyed, with the only one
remaining he was driven by gales to the isle of Cos. He was cast
ashore upon the Laceter, as the place is called, with nothing
salvaged save his arms and his men. Now he happened upon some sheep
and asked for one ram from the shepherd. This man, whose name was
Antagoras, was in the prime of bodily strength, and bade Hercules
wrestle with him; if Hercules could throw him, he might carry off the
ram. And when Hercules grappled with him, the Meropes came to the
aid of Antagoras, and the Greeks to help Hercules, and they were soon
engaged in a mighty battle. In the struggle it is said that
Hercules, being exhausted by the multitude of his adversaries, fled
to the house of a Thracian woman; there, disguising himself in
feminine garb, he managed to escape detection. But later, when he
had overcome the Meropes in another encounter, and had been purified,
he married Chalipe and assumed a gay-colored raiment. Wherefore the
priest sacrifices on the spot where it came about that the battle was
fought and bridegrooms wear feminine raiment when they welcome their
brides."

Often times myths were created to explain what was done in ritual.
The explanations do not necessarily give us the real reasons, but
what people came to believe. From myth, therefore, one can gain some
insight on what to do in ritual. Just be cautious on the conclusions
you draw from myth.


Today's thought is from Dionysius Cato 1.36:

"Anger creates hatred, harmony nurtures love."
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 57793 From: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com Date: 2008-09-28
Subject: Latin study online resources, 9/28/2008, 12:00 pm
Reminder from:   Nova-Roma Yahoo! Group
 
Title:   Latin study online resources
 
Date:   Sunday September 28, 2008
Time:   12:00 pm - 1:00 pm
Repeats:   This event repeats every month.
Notes:   If you want to learn Latin but are too busy to take a class, or if you are an independent or self-directed learner, visit our website and see what is available online for you. http://novaroma.org/nr/Online_resources_for_Latin
 
Copyright © 2008  Yahoo! Inc. All Rights Reserved | Terms of Service | Privacy Policy
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 57794 From: Maior Date: 2008-09-28
Subject: Re: religiones romanae?
M. Hortensia Maior Modiano Guzzo quiritibus spd;
yes? why are you here. And did you never hear of the Roman
Colonia? Roman colonies? They existed in Germany, Romania, Britain
Syria, Judaea and naturally Africa, were there the state cultus was
practiced!

It shocks C. Guzzo to believe that in Carthage, Syria, Judaea non-
ethnic Romans were Roman citizens and followed the cultus deorum;-)

Guzzo, I suggest you read Beard & North vol.1. p.333 or Jorg
Rupke, "Roman Religion" or Bassiano's "Il Flaminato nelle Province
Africa." The Flaminate in provincial Africa.
optime valete
M. Hortensia Maior
sacerdos Mentis



>
> Then why do you remain in Nova Roma if you have so much disdain
for it?
>
> Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus
>
> On Sun, Sep 28, 2008 at 7:23 AM, Avv. Claudio Guzzo
> <claudio.guzzo@...>wrote:
>
> > Salve Livia!
> > You wrote:
> > "My co-religionists are the practicers of Religio Romana, but I
respect the
> > practicers of other religions too (well, except the monotheists -
I tend to
> > lose my patience with those after a while)."
> >
> > What "religio romana" are you talking about? You look like those
romans
> > that fighted against christians or against pagans: who cares of
a new
> > civil(...) war? A novaroman "lady" loves to write her hate
against me and
> > tell to others that I am a kind of naziskin, but she doesn't
know me: I love
> > Pax.
> > Now, Livia should know that, there is a monotheist religio in
Roma, there
> > are its priests and its roman state-religion (Vatican City);
that religion
> > (its pontifex, Benedictus XVI) loves greek and roman culture and
its priests
> > have a roman common language (latin), some of its practicers
were Roman
> > Emperors (in the inspired age of NR) too; now, Catholic Church
is the
> > only religio romana.
> > There is a novaroman religion in a NR mailing list too, with an
english
> > common language and some "priests"; it is not roman, beacuse we
can't live
> > and practice a religion in Roma looking at a mail or giving our
money to
> > some american guru... if we are not insane or stupid!
> > Vale.
> > ACC
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 57795 From: Lucia Livia Plauta Date: 2008-09-28
Subject: Re: roman priests and state religion
Salve Claudio,
nobody is blaming you. I just said I couldn't understand your posts.
To everybody else: in the italian part of his post Guzzo calls Religio
romana "roman superstition". I guess this shows where he stands.

Caro Claudio, nessuno ti sta biasimando. Ho semplicemente detto che
non capisco i tuoi post.
A tutti gli altri: nella parte italiana del suo post Guzzo chiama la
religione romana "superstizione romana". Credo che questo chiarisca la
sua posizione.

Valete,
Livia

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Avv. Claudio Guzzo"
<claudio.guzzo@...> wrote:
>
> Salve.
> If some novaroman doesn't love nature, culture and their gods, why
should I be to blame?
> what roman priests do they want to talk about or worship? what religion?
> There is a list for talking about their "religio romana".
> Sorry for my english.
> P.S.: se qualche novaromano non ama la natura, la cultura e i loro
dei, perché io sono da biasimare? di quali preti romani vogliono
parlare o venerare? quale religione? C'è una lista per parlare della
loro "superstizione romana".
> Scusate il mio inglese
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 57796 From: Lucia Livia Plauta Date: 2008-09-28
Subject: Re: religiones romanae?
Salve Claudio,
I'm talking about the "Religio romana" which is the official religion
of Nova Roma, that is, the reconstructed version of the polytheist
religion that was the State religion of Rome before christianism.
In Nova Roma there is a convention of calling this religion "Religio
romana" or "cultus deorum" and calling the various monotheist
religions with their own names: Judaism, Catholicism, Protestantism,
Islam, etc.

I didn't tell anybody that you are a naziskin, In fact I told people
the contrary, but I can't prevent people on this list from remembering
that you supported an american far-right exponent.

Of course I know that there is a monotheistic religion in Rome, but
that's not called "Religio romana, but "Catholicism".

Of course you can't practice a religion (anywhere, not only in Rome)
by reading a mailing list or giving money to somebody, but nobody here
confuses practicing a religion with talking about it, that's why we
practice Religio romana at home, by honouring our lares and penates,
or in public sacrifices to the Gods.

I can also remind you that this year there was a public sacrifice to
Jupiter Latiaris on Monte Albano, near Rome.

Parlo della "religio romana" che è la religione ufficiale di Nova
Roma, cioè la versione ricostruita della religione politeista che era
la religione di Stato di Roma prima del cristianesimo.
A Nova Roma c'è la convenzione di chiamare questa religione "Religio
romana" o "cultus deorum", e di chiamare le religioni monoteistiche
con il loro nome, cioè ebraismo, cattolicesimo, protestantesimo,
islam, ecc.

Non ho detto a nessuno che sei un naziskin, anzi, ho detto il
contrario, ma non posso impedire a persone su questa lista di
ricordare che hai preso le difese di un esponente dell'estrema destra
americana.

Naturalmente so che c'è una religione monoteistica a Roma, però si
chiama "cattolicesimo" e non "Religio romana".

Naturalmente non si può praticare una religione (dappertutto, non solo
a Roma) leggendo una mailing list o dando soldi a qualcuno, ma nessuno
qui confonde il praticare una religione con il parlarne, infatti
pratichiamo la religio romana a casa onorando i lari e i penati, o con
sacrifici pubblici agli dei.

Posso anche ricordarti che quest'anno c'è stato un sacrificio pubblico
a Giove Laziale sul Monte Cavo, sopra Rocca di Papa, vicino a Roma.

Vale,
Livia

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Avv. Claudio Guzzo"
<claudio.guzzo@...> wrote:
>
> Salve Livia!
> You wrote:
> "My co-religionists are the practicers of Religio Romana, but I
respect the practicers of other religions too (well, except the
monotheists - I tend to lose my patience with those after a while)."
>
> What "religio romana" are you talking about? You look like those
romans that fighted against christians or against pagans: who cares of
a new civil(...) war? A novaroman "lady" loves to write her hate
against me and tell to others that I am a kind of naziskin, but she
doesn't know me: I love Pax.
> Now, Livia should know that, there is a monotheist religio in Roma,
there are its priests and its roman state-religion (Vatican City);
that religion (its pontifex, Benedictus XVI) loves greek and roman
culture and its priests have a roman common language (latin), some of
its practicers were Roman Emperors (in the inspired age of NR) too;
now, Catholic Church is the only religio romana.
> There is a novaroman religion in a NR mailing list too, with an
english common language and some "priests"; it is not roman, beacuse
we can't live and practice a religion in Roma looking at a mail or
giving our money to some american guru... if we are not insane or stupid!
> Vale.
> ACC
>
>
> Vale,
> L. Livia Plauta
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 57797 From: Maior Date: 2008-09-28
Subject: Re: roman priests and state religion
Salve Claudio:
si, io avevo studiato Italiano nell'Università, scriva in Italiano
per rispondere. Io può spiegare senza problemma. Non credo, non ho
detto che lei è neo'nazista, fascista forse...

I told Claudio I studied Italian in university, so he can write and
be sure of getting his point across, also that I don't think he is a
neo-nazi, a fascist..perhaps.
Maior

>
> Salve Claudio,
> nobody is blaming you. I just said I couldn't understand your
posts.
> To everybody else: in the italian part of his post Guzzo calls
Religio
> romana "roman superstition". I guess this shows where he stands.
>
> Caro Claudio, nessuno ti sta biasimando. Ho semplicemente detto che
> non capisco i tuoi post.
> A tutti gli altri: nella parte italiana del suo post Guzzo chiama
la
> religione romana "superstizione romana". Credo che questo
chiarisca la
> sua posizione.
>
> Valete,
> Livia
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Avv. Claudio Guzzo"
> <claudio.guzzo@> wrote:
> >
> > Salve.
> > If some novaroman doesn't love nature, culture and their gods,
why
> should I be to blame?
> > what roman priests do they want to talk about or worship? what
religion?
> > There is a list for talking about their "religio romana".
> > Sorry for my english.
> > P.S.: se qualche novaromano non ama la natura, la cultura e i
loro
> dei, perché io sono da biasimare? di quali preti romani vogliono
> parlare o venerare? quale religione? C'è una lista per parlare
della
> loro "superstizione romana".
> > Scusate il mio inglese
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 57798 From: marcushoratius Date: 2008-09-29
Subject: a. d. III Kalendas Octrobres: Fabricius and Pyrrhus
M. Moravius Piscinus cultoribus Deorum et omnibus salutem plurimam
dicit: Nemesis consilia communicet nobiscum.

Hodie est ante diem III Kalendas Octobras; haec dies comitialis est:

"No punishment does Nemesis ever claim, but retribution. She is a
strict goddess, and vehement, not one to be taken lightly and never
one to cross." ~ G. Valerius Catullus 50.20-21


AUC 475 / 278 BCE: Gaius Fabricius and Pyrrhus

"When (Fabricius) came to see Pyrrhus about ransoming the prisoners
of war, Pyrrhus offered him much money, but he would not accept it.
On the following day Pyrrhus made ready his biggest elephant, all
unknown to Fabricius, to appear and trumpet suddenly behind his back;
and when this plan had been carried out, Fabricius turned and said
with a smile, 'Neither your money yesterday nor your beast to day has
astounded me.'

"Pyrrhus urged Fabricius to stay with him and be the second in
command, but Fabricius said, "But there is no advantage in this for
you; for, if the Epirotes come to know us both, they will prefer to
be ruled by me rather than by you." ~ Plutarch, Apophthegmata Romana
195 A

"When Fabricius had assumed the consulship, a man came into his camp
with a letter for him. The letter had been written by the physician
of Pyrrhus, who promised that he would take the king off by poison,
provided that the Romans would agree to reward him for putting an end
to the war without further hazard on their part. But Fabricius, who
was indignant at the iniquity of the man, and had disposed his
colleague to feel likewise, sent a letter to Pyrrhus with all speed
urging him to be on his guard against the plot. The letter ran as
follows: "Caius Fabricius and Quintus Aemilius, consuls of Rome, to
King Pyrrhus, health and happiness. It would appear that you are not
a good judge of either friends or enemies. You will see, when you
have read the letter which we send, that the men with whom you are at
war are honorable and just, but that those whom you trust are unjust
and base. And indeed we do not give you this information out of
regard for yourself, but in order that your ruin may not bring infamy
upon us, and that men may not say of us that we brought the war to an
end by treachery because we were unable to do so by valor." ~
Plutarch, Life of Pyrrhus 21.1-3

According to Claudius Quadrigarius, the letter sent to Pyrrhus read:

"The Consuls of Rome greet King Pyrrhus

"We, being greatly disturbed in spirit because of your continued acts
of injustice, desire to war with you as an enemy. But as a matter of
general precedent and honour, it has seemed to us that we should
desire your personal safety, in order that we may have the
opportunity of vanquishing you in the field. Your friend Nicias came
to us, to ask for a reward if he should secretly slay you. We replied
that we had no such wish, and that he could look for no advantage
from such an action; at the same time it seemed proper to inform you,
for fear that if anything of the kind should happen, the nations
might think that it was done with our connivance, and also because we
have no desire to make war by means of bribes or rewards or trickery.
As for you, if you do not take heed, you will have a fall." ~ Aulus
Gellius, 3.8.6


"Fabricius sent the letter (of Nicias) to Pyrrhus, bidding him note
the reason why he was the worst possible judge both of friends and of
foes.

"Pyrrhus, having thus discovered the plot, caused his physician to be
hanged, and gave back all the prisoners of war to Fabricius without
ransom. Fabricius, however, would not accept them as a gift, but gave
an equal number in return, lest he should give the impression that he
was getting a reward. 'For,' as he said, 'it was not to win favor
with Pyrrhus that he had disclosed the plot, but that the Romans
might not have the reputation of killing through treachery, as if
they could not win an open victory.'" ~ Plutarch, Apophthegmata
Romana 195 B


Our thought for today is from Epictetus, Enchiridion 22:

"If you have an earnest desire towards philosophy, prepare yourself
from the very first to have the multitude laugh and sneer, and
say, 'He is returned to us a philosopher all at once;' and 'Whence
this supercilious look?' Now, for your part, do not have a
supercilious look indeed; but keep steadily to those things which
appear best to you, as one appointed by God to this particular
station. For remember that, if you are persistent, those very persons
who at first ridiculed will afterwards admire you. But if you are
conquered by them, you will incur a double ridicule."
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 57799 From: Avv. Claudio Guzzo Date: 2008-09-29
Subject: roman-maine religio?
Salve.
The lady who disdain for me, ("Maior" rory12001@... rory12001
Sun Sep 28, 2008 12:48 pm (PDT)
M. Hortensia Maior Modiano Guzzo quiritibus spd;)
wrote:
MHM "yes? why are you here."
ACC: ? Where! Who? ... ? ... For courtesy?

MHM: "And did you never hear of the Roman
Colonia? Roman colonies? They existed in Germany, Romania, Britain
Syria, Judaea and naturally Africa, were there the state cultus was
practiced!"
ACC: state cultus??? was? were? May be you are dreaming some Al Qaieda's
flamen or some christian augur "converting" Maya, when you think of roman
colonies and ancient cultus deorum. It is because you are living in a
skyscreper in USA or in a modern kibbutz and you can't see all the faces of
nature and culture: cultus deorum is not only one or two religions, isn't
just a propaganda system of an old age; ancient way of loving nature and her
gods isn't the same of a secta, is it? is "roman" (syncretic and based on
roman and greek culture, with his auctoritas surviving in Roma forever) that
living religion (secta of practicers of some rites with a pontifex in Roma)
we all call catholic?

MHM: It shocks C. Guzzo to believe that in Carthage, Syria, Judaea non-
ethnic Romans were Roman citizens and followed the cultus deorum;-)
ACC: You could be a roman citizen everywhere and follow your own cultus, but
you had to be Roman to be a citizen. Cultus deorum was not a
state-religion-secta, before Caesar (and his italians) and emperors (and
their senatus-slave), and citizenship was a family and roots status. But now
I'm really shocked: has NR a "very new" roman religio(nes??)? is there a NR
pontifex romanus? does he have to fight against the "usurpator", Benedictus
XVI???
The religio romana is and will be the cultus deorum practiced in Roma ,'til
the end of time, and now the only cultus publicus practiced in Roma is that
one of Vatican City, because all other religiones have (ancient?) templa but
not a State in Roma: they are roman just in some dream of an insane mind,
who wants a new (civil?) war against catholics, italians and NR historical
(Roma until Romulus Agustulus, pax deorum, etc.) values, or in this mailing
joke: it shocks you, rory, to believe that in Roma you could follow jewish
rites and you can pray Allah, even if you were and are not Roman, and you
can love and worship all (every part of) the fruits of the murder of the son
of Jovis (not only the Mind).
MHM: Guzzo, I suggest you read Beard & North vol.1. p.333 or Jorg
Rupke, "Roman Religion" or Bassiano's "Il Flaminato nelle Province
Africa." The Flaminate in provincial Africa.
optime valete
ACC: Maior, editio maior?
MHM: M. Hortensia Maior
sacerdos Mentis

ACC: Vale
ACC A. Claudius Cicero
Let me be, please, sacerdos Vaginae
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 57800 From: Annia Minucia Marcella Date: 2008-09-29
Subject: Re: roman-maine religio?
Salvete,

Uh...What's the deal with this guy? Did he join just to hate on our organization? I'd say he's a troll.
Valete
- Annia Minucia Marcella
Legata Pro Praetore Nova Britannia
http://novabritannia.org
http://myspace.com/novabritannia
http://ciarin.com/governor


Avv. Claudio Guzzo wrote:

Salve.
The lady who disdain for me, ("Maior" rory12001@yahoo. com rory12001
Sun Sep 28, 2008 12:48 pm (PDT)
M. Hortensia Maior Modiano Guzzo quiritibus spd;)
wrote:
MHM "yes? why are you here."
ACC: ? Where! Who? ... ? ... For courtesy?

MHM: "And did you never hear of the Roman
Colonia? Roman colonies? They existed in Germany, Romania, Britain
Syria, Judaea and naturally Africa, were there the state cultus was
practiced!"
ACC: state cultus??? was? were? May be you are dreaming some Al Qaieda's
flamen or some christian augur "converting" Maya, when you think of roman
colonies and ancient cultus deorum. It is because you are living in a
skyscreper in USA or in a modern kibbutz and you can't see all the faces of
nature and culture: cultus deorum is not only one or two religions, isn't
just a propaganda system of an old age; ancient way of loving nature and her
gods isn't the same of a secta, is it? is "roman" (syncretic and based on
roman and greek culture, with his auctoritas surviving in Roma forever) that
living religion (secta of practicers of some rites with a pontifex in Roma)
we all call catholic?

MHM: It shocks C. Guzzo to believe that in Carthage, Syria, Judaea non-
ethnic Romans were Roman citizens and followed the cultus deorum;-)
ACC: You could be a roman citizen everywhere and follow your own cultus, but
you had to be Roman to be a citizen. Cultus deorum was not a
state-religion- secta, before Caesar (and his italians) and emperors (and
their senatus-slave) , and citizenship was a family and roots status. But now
I'm really shocked: has NR a "very new" roman religio(nes? ?)? is there a NR
pontifex romanus? does he have to fight against the "usurpator", Benedictus
XVI???
The religio romana is and will be the cultus deorum practiced in Roma ,'til
the end of time, and now the only cultus publicus practiced in Roma is that
one of Vatican City, because all other religiones have (ancient?) templa but
not a State in Roma: they are roman just in some dream of an insane mind,
who wants a new (civil?) war against catholics, italians and NR historical
(Roma until Romulus Agustulus, pax deorum, etc.) values, or in this mailing
joke: it shocks you, rory, to believe that in Roma you could follow jewish
rites and you can pray Allah, even if you were and are not Roman, and you
can love and worship all (every part of) the fruits of the murder of the son
of Jovis (not only the Mind).
MHM: Guzzo, I suggest you read Beard & North vol.1. p.333 or Jorg
Rupke, "Roman Religion" or Bassiano's "Il Flaminato nelle Province
Africa." The Flaminate in provincial Africa.
optime valete
ACC: Maior, editio maior?
MHM: M. Hortensia Maior
sacerdos Mentis

ACC: Vale
ACC A. Claudius Cicero
Let me be, please, sacerdos Vaginae

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 57801 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2008-09-29
Subject: Re: religio?
Salve Marcella,

He's a full citizen of three years standing. Much as I think he's
wrong about things, I'll support his right to speak in the forum.
He's hardly the only loon here.

Vale,

CN-EQVIT-MARINVS

Annia Minucia Marcella <annia@...> writes:

> Salvete,
>
> Uh...What's the deal with this guy? Did he join just to hate on our
> organization? I'd say he's a troll.
>
> Valete
> - Annia Minucia Marcella
> Legata Pro Praetore Nova Britannia
> http://novabritannia.org
> http://myspace.com/novabritannia
> http://ciarin.com/governor
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 57802 From: Avv. Claudio Guzzo Date: 2008-09-29
Subject: religiones romanae?
Salve!
"Lucia Livia Plauta" cases@... liviacases
Sun Sep 28, 2008 1:38 pm (PDT)
wrote,
LLP: "Salve Claudio,
I'm talking about the "Religio romana" which is the official religion
of Nova Roma, that is, the reconstructed version of the polytheist
religion that was the State religion of Rome before christianism.
In Nova Roma there is a convention of calling this religion "Religio
romana" or "cultus deorum""
ACC: You can be human if you are a potato, if there is a convention...

LLP: "be and calling the various monotheist
religions with their own names: Judaism, Catholicism, Protestantism,
Islam, etc."
ACC: catholicism is now the doctrina of the catholic Roman church, that
roman religio (the only one, but the NR convention...), builded upon the
reconstructed templa of Mithra, Jovis, etc..

LLP: "I didn't tell anybody that you are a naziskin, In fact I told people
the contrary, but I can't prevent people on this list from remembering
that you supported an american far-right exponent."
ACC: Maior told it. I try to support a NR citizen with my NR family name. I
don't think he was far-right, and he was accused of other things (he wanted
USA to give to NR a land).
LPP: "Of course I know that there is a monotheistic religion in Rome, but
that's not called "Religio romana, but "Catholicism"."
ACC: that religion is everywhere and its church is roman and has a state in
Roma.

LPP: "Of course you can't practice a religion (anywhere, not only in Rome)
by reading a mailing list or giving money to somebody, but nobody here
confuses practicing a religion with talking about it, that's why we
practice Religio romana"
ACC: that convention confuses Roma with religio, cultus publicus with
superstition, pagan and roman, fantasy and history
LPP: "at home, by honouring our lares and penates,
or in public sacrifices to the Gods."
ACC: who should do these public sacrifices? who let you be a sacerdos?

LPP: "I can also remind you that this year there was a public sacrifice to
Jupiter Latiaris on Monte Albano, near Rome."
ACC: public? Is there an auctoritas somewhere?

Parlo della "religio romana" che è la religione ufficiale di Nova
Roma, cioè la versione ricostruita della religione politeista che era
la religione di Stato di Roma prima del cristianesimo.
ACC: Religione di stato? A Roma c'erano tante religioni ben prima del
cristianesimo.
LPP: A Nova Roma c'è la convenzione di chiamare questa religione "Religio
romana" o "cultus deorum", e di chiamare le religioni monoteistiche
con il loro nome, cioè ebraismo, cattolicesimo, protestantesimo,
islam, ecc.
ACC: come se esistesse un libro sacro delle religioni politeiste (quali?)
praticate a Roma, una dottrina unitaria da propagandare, coi suoi proseliti
e i suoi filosofi. Come se il cattolicesimo, frutto dell'istinto di
sopravvivenza di Roma eterna, si potesse liquidare al pari delle altre
superstizioni, dimenticandone la natura.
L.P.P.: Non ho detto a nessuno che sei un naziskin, anzi, ho detto il
contrario, ma non posso impedire a persone su questa lista di
ricordare che hai preso le difese di un esponente dell'estrema destra
americana.
ACC: tu riferisci quello che ti viene detto? mi sembri un titolo del
Giornale che parla di Veltroni o di Repubblica che parla di Berlusconi. Io
non ho nemmeno preso le difese di un naziskin americano. Ho cercato di
assistere un nome novaromano simile al mio, visto che nessuno voleva
difenderlo e che il pregiudizio (incivile) di sua condanna era evidente.
LPP: Naturalmente so che c'è una religione monoteistica a Roma, però si
chiama "cattolicesimo" e non "Religio romana".

LPP: Naturalmente non si può praticare una religione (dappertutto, non solo
a Roma) leggendo una mailing list o dando soldi a qualcuno, ma nessuno
qui confonde il praticare una religione con il parlarne, infatti
pratichiamo la religio romana a casa onorando i lari e i penati, o con
sacrifici pubblici agli dei.
ACC: sacrifici pubblici. Mi ricorda, poverine, le "streghe" e gli altri
poveracci che - vinta la loro cultura - tentavano di resistere agli
imperatori romani cristiani, oppure quei miseri cristiani dati in pasto alle
belve e additati come oggi si additano i terroristi islamici o gli esponenti
nazi. Ma mi ricorda anche tanti antichi riti che, attraverso la religione
cattolico romana ovvero la tradizione popolare, ancora si praticano nelle
nostre terre natie, Livia.

LPP: Posso anche ricordarti che quest'anno c'è stato un sacrificio pubblico
a Giove Laziale sul Monte Cavo, sopra Rocca di Papa, vicino a Roma.
ACC: Chi erano i sacredoti? abbiamo il messia di giove?
LPP:Vale,
Livia
ACC: Ciao
Claudio
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 57803 From: Annia Minucia Marcella Date: 2008-09-29
Subject: Re: religio?
Salve,

Regardless of his citizenship, he's a troll. It's best not to  feed him.
Vale
- Annia Minucia Marcella
Legata Pro Praetore Nova Britannia
http://novabritannia.org
http://myspace.com/novabritannia
http://ciarin.com/governor


Gnaeus Equitius Marinus wrote:

Salve Marcella,

He's a full citizen of three years standing. Much as I think he's
wrong about things, I'll support his right to speak in the forum.
He's hardly the only loon here.

Vale,

CN-EQVIT-MARINVS

Annia Minucia Marcella <annia@ciarin. com> writes:

> Salvete,
>
> Uh...What's the deal with this guy? Did he join just to hate on our
> organization? I'd say he's a troll.
>
> Valete
> - Annia Minucia Marcella
> Legata Pro Praetore Nova Britannia
> http://novabritanni a.org
> http://myspace. com/novabritanni a
> http://ciarin. com/governor

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 57804 From: philippe cardon Date: 2008-09-29
Subject: Re: religio?
he marinus what is this right for guzzo to speak against the gods the religio and the priests? nobody have this right here because some awfull things like the &st and 2nd articles of the american bill of rights are not in use in NR as i know (or is Nr the same thing than the states?)
 
i see here a scandal an impiety something we need a piacculum from the collegium pontificium and the magistrates because it is a fight against the honor of the Gods so something blasphemous which call for reparation
 
varro
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 57805 From: philippe cardon Date: 2008-09-29
Subject: Re: catholiicisma sa RR?
the fact that man can call the catholic church the roman Church and even the Roman Religion is interestng in the historical point of view to see how catholics link themselves to pagan roman times and their christianity to old paganism as a yncretist view on christianity and a geat capacity of assimilation which made the strengh and also the weakness of catholicism
 
so to say: all religion lead to this religion, the true christian church and faith which is the hisghest point of the spiritual growing of mankind without this cutting off christinaity from paganism as the protestants think about
 
but for us Roman Pagans this idea as no worth and te fact that th pope calls himself Pontifex Maximus and his church the roman religion  has no importance, we are not concerned
and we answer NO, uou're a liar
 
varro
 
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 57806 From: philippe cardon Date: 2008-09-29
Subject: (no subject)
>
> juste une anecdote pour montrer comment le catholicisme se rapporte et se
> comprend par rapport au paganisme
> dan mon restaurant entre autre babioles pieuses j'ai un tableau sur métal
> représentant le couple créateur d'une tribu indienne soufflant la
> prospérité sur terre
>
> ct été un prêtre venu manger ave des mais m'a interroger sur ce tableau
> qui avait retenu sn attention
>
> je lui en explique la signification
>
> il me répond: "je croyais que c'était la trinité chrétienne qui était
> représentée", et moi de dire "Oh non! je crains que ce ne soit beaucoup
> plus païen que cela!"
>
> et lui de conclure - voilà ce qui est intéressant: "CA NE FAIT RIEN, NOUS
> ALLONS BAPTISER TOUT CELA"
>
> voila comment les catholiques voient le paganisme, comme une étape
> préparatoire, une étape inférieure dans e développement spirituel de
> l'humanité que leur église va intégrer, améliorer et dépasser mais sans le
> renier tout à fait
>
> VArro
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Orange vous informe que cet e-mail a ete controle par l'anti-virus mail.
> Aucun virus connu a ce jour par nos services n'a ete detecte.
>
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 57807 From: R.H.M.C. Date: 2008-09-29
Subject: Re:
Sorry, I dont know if its allowed to copy/paste a text, but I think you will like this:
 
 
 

Volume 6, Number 2 · February 17, 1966

Heresies

By W.H. Auden

Pagan and Christian in an Age of Anxiety
by E.R. Dodds

Cambridge University Press, 144 pp., $5.50

Seventy years ago, undergraduates in revolt against their respectable churchgoing parents used to chant exultantly in chorus:

Wilt thou yet take all, Galilean? but these thou shalt not take,
The laurel, the palms and the paean, the breasts of the nymphs in the brake:
Breasts more soft than a dove's, that tremble with tenderer breath:
And all the wings of the Loves, and all the joy before death.

Alas, as these lectures demonstrate, the tidy contrast in Swinburne's lines between jolly, good-looking, sexy, extrovert Pagans on the one hand, and gloomy, emaciated, guilt-ridden, introvert Christians on the other was a romantic myth without any basis in historical fact. During the period between the accession of Marcus Aurelius in A. D. 161 and the conversion of Constantine in 313, the writings of Pagans and Christians alike seem to indicate that "men were ceasing to observe the external world and to try to understand it, utilize it or improve it. They were driven in upon themselves…the idea of the beauty of the heavens and of the world went out of fashion and was replaced by that of the Infinite."

Of his own attitude towards his material, Professor Dodds has this to say:

As an agnostic I cannot share the standpoint of those who see the triumph of Christianity as the divine event to which the whole creation moved. But equally I cannot see it as the blotting out of the sunshine of Hellenism by what Proclus called "the barbarian theosophy." If there is more about Pagans in these lectures than about Christians, it is not because I like them better; it is merely because I know them better. I stand outside this particular battle, though not above it. I am interested less in the issues which separated the combatants than in the attitudes and experiences which bound them together.

As his reviewer, it is only fair that I should follow the author's example and state mine. As an Episcopalian, I do not believe that Christianity did triumph or has triumphed. Thus, while I consider the fourth-century victory of Christian doctrine over Neoplatonism, Manicheism, Gnosticism, Mithraism, etc., to have been what school history books used to call "a good thing," I consider the adoption of Christianity as the official State religion, backed by the coercive powers of the State, however desirable it may have seemed at the time, to have been a "bad," that is to say, an unchristian thing. So far as the writers with whom Professor Dodds deals are concerned, I like his Pagans much better than his Christians, but, in his determination to be impartial, he seems to me to overlook the fact that only one of his Christians, Clement of Alexandria, can be called an orthodox Christian as orthodoxy was to be defined in the succeeding centuries. My favorite theologian of the period is Irenaeus, and I am surprised that Professor Dodds says so little about him. He tells us that Irenaeus came to the defense of the Montanists, not, surely, because he agreed with them but because, gentle soul that he was, he disliked persecution, even of cranks. But there is no discussion of his writings. Lastly, though not explicitly stated, I think the moral of Professor Dodds's book is that, in any serious controversy where it is impossible for both parties to be right, the points upon which they agree are likely to be just those upon which, to later generations, they will appear to have both been wrong.

In his first lecture Professor Dodds examines the attitudes of the period towards the phenomenal world and the human body, and the various theories put forward to account for the existence of evil; in his second the relations between men and the daimonic world, the world of spirits which were believed to act as intermediaries between the human and the divine; in his third he discusses mystical experience in the strict sense, that is to say, the direct encounter of the human and the divine.

However different in their conceptions of the relation between God and the Cosmos, orthodox Platonism and orthodox Christianity were agreed that the existence of the Cosmos is a good and in some manner a manifestation of the Divine goodness. The psalmist says: "The heavens declare the glory of God and the firmament showeth his handiwork." Plato says that the Cosmos is "an image of the intelligible, a perceptible god, supreme in greatness and excellence, in beauty and perfection, single in its kind and one." It was this agreement which permitted Christendom to accept the Cosmic Model of Aristotle and the Hellenistic astronomers, and for the poets of the Middle Ages to find in it a constant source of joy and inspiration, in spite of the disparity between the Aristotelian God the Model presupposes, the impassive One who is loved by his creatures but cannot return their love, and the Christian God who became flesh and suffered for man on a cross. (As C. S. Lewis pointed out in The Discarded Image, references to the Model, so common in medieval poetry, are for the most part absent from medieval devotional and mystical writings.)


Even during the prosperous years of the Antonine peace, radically dualistic theories which were neither Platonic nor Christian began to be propounded and their influence grew stronger as the political and economic conditions in the Empire grew worse. Some held that the Cosmos had been created either by an Evil Spirit, or by an ignorant one, or by "bodiless intelligences who became bored with contemplating God and turned to the inferior"; others concluded that it had somehow or other fallen into the power of star-demons. The incarnation of the human soul in a fleshly body, living and dying on earth, was felt by many to be a curse not a blessing, and accounted for as being either "the punishment for an earlier sin committed in Heaven, or the result of a false choice made by the soul itself." Consequently, to an increasing number the body became an object of disgust and resentment. "Plotinus appeared ashamed of having a body at all; St. Anthony blushed every time he had to eat or satisfy any other bodily function." Among some Christians—the Pagans seem to have been less afflicted—it was fornication, not pride, which came more and more to be regarded as the archetypal sin, and violent mortification of the flesh as the only road to salvation.

To judge from the documents it would appear that in the third century Christianity was in grave danger of turning into Gnosticism. It did not, which suggests that the most vociferous and articulate were not typically representative of their Christian brethren. Not all, not even the majority, can have held Marcion's doctrine of the creation, or castrated themselves like Origen, or indulged in glossolalia like Montanus, or behaved like Simeon Stylites. Orthodox Christianity, it is true, did accept the existence of the Devil, but it denied that he could create anything. When the New Testament speaks of "The Prince of this world," it certainly does not mean the Prince of the Cosmos nor assert that, so long as they are on earth, human souls have no option but to obey the orders of the Devil. By this world is meant, I should guess, Leviathan, the Social Beast. One may or may not hold the Devil responsible, but, when one considers the behavior of large organized social groups throughout human history, this much is certain; it has been characterized neither by love nor by logic. As for the more repellant and exhibitionistic kinds of asceticism, it was not long before the Church authorities set limits to them, condemning, for example, those who abstained from wine and meat on feast-days for "blasphemously inveighing against the creation."

Much of Professor Dodds's second, and most entertaining, lecture is devoted to dreams, in particular to the dream book of a certain Aelius Aristides—a fascinating "nut" and an ideal subject, surely, for E. M. Forster—and to the dreams which Perpetua, a young Christian convert, had while she lay in prison awaiting martyrdom. I will not spoil the reader's pleasure by giving quotations. Whatever the social conditions, in all ages the uneducated have considered dreams significant and it was only, I should imagine, during the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries that the cultured dismissed them as meaningless. Since Freud we are all again agreed that "dreams are purposive."

A fascination with the "occult," on the other hand, with astrology, spiritualism, magic, and the like, is generally, I suspect, a symptom of social alienation. In the third century, astrologers, oracles, and mediums were taken seriously by Pagans and Christians alike. The Christian "belly-talkers," male and female, called themselves prophetes, but nothing that Professor Dodds has to tell us about them convinces me that they had anything of value to prophesy. Genuine inspiration, whether in artistic or religious utterance, may be mysterious but it is always comprehensible. Of The Third Testament, a montanist document, Professor Dodds says: "Only a few scraps have been preserved, and like most communications from the Beyond, these scraps, it must be confessed, are extremely disappointing." And he quotes Professor Greenslade's verdict on Montanus: "The Holy Spirit seemed to say nothing of any religious or intellectual value to him." In due time the prophetes were suppressed by the ecclesiastical authorities, but one must not allow one's natural dislike of stuffy bishops to deceive one into imagining that the suppression was a great spiritual loss.

Professor Dodds classifies mystical experiences as being either "extrovertive," conveyed to the subject through his physical senses, or "introvertive," reached by the via negativa; a training of the mind to empty itself of all sensory images.

The two typical extrovertive visions are the Vision of Dame Kind and the Vision of Eros. There is no record of either in the third century. Plato had described the Vision of Eros, but we find no more descriptions of it until those of the Provençal poets in the twelfth century. Of the Vision of Dame Kind, there are hints in the Bacchae of Euripides but no unmistakeable description, so far as I know, before Traherne's in the late seventeenth century.


Of the introvertive, specifically religious, mystical experience, there are, rather oddly, no surviving Christian examples from the third century. The two men, Plotinus and Porphyry, whose writings were later to have a great influence upon Christian mystics, were both Neoplatonists. A problem posed by all descriptions of mystical experience is the impossibility of knowing to what extent the intellectual and theological presuppositions of the mystic modify the experience itself. To a Neoplatonist, the vision of the One must necessarily be one-sided: What he sees cannot see him. To a Christian, it must necessarily be felt as an encounter between two persons. To say, as some theologians have, that in the mystical vision it is "God who takes the first step" seems to me meaningless, unless all that is meant is that it is the Grace of God which causes such-and-such an individual to desire and seek to attain it through ascetic discipline and habits of prayer. If he fails, he can, of course, explain this by saying that God does not wish to reveal Himself to him. This the Neoplatonist cannot say; he is faced with the problem of explaining why, once he has discovered the correct technique of meditation, he cannot enjoy the vision at will: In the course of a lifetime, Plotinus experienced it four times, Porphyry once.

Professor Dodds says that he agrees with Festugière's dictum: "Misery and Mysticism are related facts." Are they always? I would agree that when mystical theories are fashionable, talked about at parties by people who have no intention of submitting themselves to the arduous discipline required for practice, society is probably not in a very healthy state, but most of the practicing mystics we know about do not seem to have been miserable persons; on the contrary, they were often not only jolly but active, practically-minded organizers.

In fact it now looks as if the cultivation of extrovertive mystical experience—the Vision of Dame Kind can, it seems, be induced by the hallucenogenic drugs—is more likely in practice to lead to a loss of concern for other human beings than the introvertive.


In his last lecture Professor Dodds discusses the ways in which Pagans and Christians thought about each other. From being an obscure sect, disliked by the crowds, as oddities always are, and suspected of horrid secret rites, but people no man of education would give a thought to, by the reign of Marcus Aurelius, Christians had become numerous and influential enough to be taken seriously both by the authorities and by intellectuals. Persecution, hitherto sporadic and incoherent, became under Marcus Aurelius, Decius, and Diocletian a deliberate planned State policy. Intellectuals like Celsus and Porphyry felt that Christianity was a cultural threat dangerous enough to deserve attack and, on the Christian side, there were now converts like Tertullian and Origen educated enough to explain and defend their beliefs. To the authorities the obstinate refusal of Christians to pay formal homage to the god-emperor made them enemies of society. Today it seems strange that they should have made such a fuss, since nobody seriously believed that the Emperors were divine, but then it seems equally strange that the Emperors should have imagined a stable social order depended upon their subjects politely saying that they were. More understandably, their proselytizing zeal caused indignation: the more fanatic and tactless among them were quite prepared, for the sake of saving a soul, to wreck marriages and encourage children to disobey their parents.

To the educated Pagan, the importance they attached to pistis, or blind faith, their indifference to logismos, or reasoned conviction, seemed willfully irrational, though, as the century progressed, both sides shifted their ground. Tertullian might say defiantly credo quia absurdum est, but Origen and Clement recognized the value to apologetics of learning, literature, and philosophical argument, while the Neoplatonists came to realize that their position did not rest on logic alone, that they, too, held certain absolute presuppositions by faith. What strikes one now about the debates between them is that they seem to have been mostly concerned with minor issues. The fundamental doctrines on which they disagreed, the relation of God to the Cosmos, and the possibility of incarnate deity, were seldom seriously discussed. Instead, they argued endlessly about miracles and prophecies, a barren topic since both sides agreed that miracles could be wrought and prophecies made by evil spirits and men as well as good. They accused each other, probably justly, of reading meanings into texts which were not there, but both sides went in for allegorical interpretation, Christians of the Bible, Neoplatonists of Homer.

No certain or complete explanations can ever be given why one religion or Weltanschauung is accepted by a society in preference to its rivals, and Professor Dodds would be the first to say that his suggestions are tentative and partial. First, he thinks, there was the impression made by the Christian martyrs.

It is evident that Lucan, Marcus Aurelius, Galen and Celsus were all, despite themselves, impressed by the courage of the Christians in face of death and torture…. We know from modern experience of political martyrdoms that the blood of the martyrs really is the seed of the Church, always provided that the seed falls on suitable ground and is not sown too thickly.

Secondly, the Church was open to all men, without regard to social class, education, or their past lives. While, at most times, the Church has welcomed the intellectual, the artist, the mystic, it has never limited its membership to a cultural elite nor regarded mystical experience as necessary to salvation. Further, though organized hierarchically, high office has been open, in theory if not always in practice, to any man of talent and character irrespective of his birth. Thirdly, it was more successful than its rivals in giving its converts a sense of belonging to a community. Not only did it provide the essentials of social security by caring for widows, orphans, the old, the sick, the unemployed, but also to "the uprooted and lonely, the urbanized tribesman, the peasant come to town in search of work, the demobilized soldier, the rentier ruined by inflation, and the manumitted slave, it offered human warmth: Some one was interested in them, both here and hereafter."


I should like to venture a fourth suggestion. Despite appearances to the contrary, the Christian faith, by virtue of its doctrines about creation, the nature of man and the revelation of Divine purpose in historical time, was really a more this-worldly religion than any of its competitors, so that, when its opportunity came in the following centuries with the collapse of civil government in the West, it was the Church which took on the task of creating such social order and of preserving such cultural heritage as there was. On the evidence of its history, it would seem that Christianity has always been more tempted by worldliness, by love of money and power than, say, Islam or Buddhism. The charge which may justly be brought against the Church is, not that it has been unpractical or a-political, but that it has so often been all too political, all too ready to make shady deals with any temporal power which would advance what it believed to be its interests.

For the majority of mankind life has always been uncertain and painful, but not every kind of uncertainty and suffering causes anxiety, only the unexpected kinds. Men can take most natural disasters like famine and flood in their stride because they know that harvests are bound to fail sometimes and rivers to overflow their banks. An epidemic of plague, however, can work psychological havoc because, although men have always known they must die, they are now suddenly faced by an unexpected kind of death.

Still deeper and more widespread is the anxiety caused when the techniques a society has invented for coping with life, which hitherto have been successful, no longer work. The Roman Empire had evolved legal, military and economic techniques for maintaining internal law and order, defending itself against external enemies, and managing the production and exchange of goods; in the third century these proved inadequate to prevent civil war, invasion by barbarians and depreciation of the currency. In the twentieth century, it is not the failure but the fantastic success of our techniques of production that is creating a society in which it is becoming increasingly difficult to live a human life. In our reactions to this one can see many parallels to the third century. Instead of Gnostics we have existentialists and God-is-dead theologians; instead of Neoplatonists, "humanist" professors; instead of desert eremites, heroin-addicts and Beats; instead of the cult of virginity; do-it-yourself sex manuals and sado-masochistic pornography. Now as then, a proper balance between detachment and commitment seems impossible to find or to hold. Both lead to evil. The introvert, intent upon improving himself, is deaf to his neighbor when he cries for help; the extrovert, intent upon improving the world, pinches his neighbor (for his own good of course) until he cries for help. We are not, any of us, very nice.



 
2008/9/29 philippe cardon <philippe.cardon01@...>



>
> juste une anecdote pour montrer comment le catholicisme se rapporte et se
> comprend par rapport au paganisme
> dan mon restaurant entre autre babioles pieuses j'ai un tableau sur métal
> représentant le couple créateur d'une tribu indienne soufflant la
> prospérité sur terre
>
> ct été un prêtre venu manger ave des mais m'a interroger sur ce tableau
> qui avait retenu sn attention
>
> je lui en explique la signification
>
> il me répond: "je croyais que c'était la trinité chrétienne qui était
> représentée", et moi de dire "Oh non! je crains que ce ne soit beaucoup
> plus païen que cela!"
>
> et lui de conclure - voilà ce qui est intéressant: "CA NE FAIT RIEN, NOUS
> ALLONS BAPTISER TOUT CELA"
>
> voila comment les catholiques voient le paganisme, comme une étape
> préparatoire, une étape inférieure dans e développement spirituel de
> l'humanité que leur église va intégrer, améliorer et dépasser mais sans le
> renier tout à fait
>
> VArro
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------
> Orange vous informe que cet e-mail a ete controle par l'anti-virus mail.
> Aucun virus connu a ce jour par nos services n'a ete detecte.
>
>


Group: Nova-Roma Message: 57808 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2008-09-29
Subject: Re: religio?
Salve Varro,

If you think he has violated our laws, you're welcome to bring a
petitio actionis against him to the Praetors. You'd be well advised
to review our Constitution and our laws before you attempt to silence
another citizen with claims of impiety.

Vale,

CN-EQVIT-MARINVS

philippe cardon <philippe.cardon01@...> writes:

> he marinus what is this right for guzzo to speak against the gods
> the religio and the priests? nobody have this right here because
> some awfull things like the &st and 2nd articles of the american
> bill of rights are not in use in NR as i know (or is Nr the same
> thing than the states?)
>
> i see here a scandal an impiety something we need a piacculum from
> the collegium pontificium and the magistrates because it is a fight
> against the honor of the Gods so something blasphemous which call
> for reparation
>
> varro
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 57809 From: philippe cardon Date: 2008-09-29
Subject: Re: religio?
Marinus, the sacred and invoilable law i follow is the respect of the Gods above all
 
impity is when someone follow anothers gods that the state gods so this crime is very well attested here and our duty to placate this outrageous words and way of life is very well attested too
 
how could the gods love our sacrifice and parayers if we accept people among us who speak against them so in such derotatory way?
 
such christian superstitio must be cutt off from the head to the bottom vowed to Dii infernii as were the vestales who broken their vows of castity
 
 odium humani generis, that is the christain  crime
 
a claim must grow from all citizens, i call you all, to your altasr to offer the propitiatory sacrifice we must offer to the gods because gods' anger come upon us they will again leave the state and the city and we have broken the pax deorum accepting such crime
it is such a danger for the republic when citizens speal agaings the religio and the gods
 
varro
 
varro
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 57810 From: David Kling (Modianus) Date: 2008-09-29
Subject: Re: roman-maine religio?
Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus Anniae Minuciae Marcellae salutem dicit

I wonder the same thing, why is he here if he hates Nova Roma so much, if he thinks that only his own perspective is the perspective of worth.  He does seem like a troll.

Valete;

Caeso Buteo

On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 7:36 AM, Annia Minucia Marcella <annia@...> wrote:

Salvete,

Uh...What's the deal with this guy? Did he join just to hate on our organization? I'd say he's a troll.

Valete
- Annia Minucia Marcella
Legata Pro Praetore Nova Britannia
http://novabritannia.org
http://myspace.com/novabritannia
http://ciarin.com/governor



Group: Nova-Roma Message: 57811 From: Colin Brodd Date: 2008-09-29
Subject: Re: religio?
Gaius Tullius Valerianus Germanicus omnibus S.P.D.
 
Gnaeus Equitius Marinus has a point. We have laws relating to charges of blasphemy and impiety. Below  is the text of the decretum against blasphemy. Note bene part 4 of the interpretation: "Comments, questions about the Religio and its involvement with the State, or the members of its priesthood are encouraged as long as these do not escalate into a general public disturbance." So I guess the question is - has this become a public disturbance? Is there value in this discussion, o Quirites, or is there not? If not, does the Collegium Pontificum wish to invoke the "blasphemy clause," bringin the matter to the Senate and Praetors with the possible penalties listed ("banishment, fines, depravation of certain freedoms (i.e., list moderation)")
 
I would like to add that while I generally do not approve of silencing a citizen who wishes to speak his mind, there seems (to me) to be almost no value in discussing whether the Catholic church has any right to think of itself as "religio Romana." This is escalating, and while we are free to simply ignore it, should we have to? Many feel the gods themselves are being defamed. The Collegium Pontificum is convened at the moment, I believe - does anyone wish to raise the issue?
 
The test of ther decretum:
By this decretum, the Collegium Pontificum officially clarifies the 'blasphemy clause' contained in the Nova Roma Constitution located in the Public Institutions Section, VI (a):
"Magistrates, Senators, and citizens need not be practitioners of the Religio Romana, but may not engage in any public activity that intentionally blasphemes or defames the Gods, the Religio Romana, or its practitioners."

The College of Pontiffs declare the intent of the above constitutional phrase to mean the following:

  1. The Religio Romana will not come under attack with intent to remove or replace the Religio Romana as the State religion of Nova Roma; and that the Religio Romana shall not be deliberately slandered, defamed, or mocked with intent to undermine its position as the State Religion of Nova Roma.
  2. No elected official shall use their elected powers or political status as a means of working to undermine, remove, or replace the Religio Romana as the State Religion of Nova Roma.
  3. No Citizen or Magistrate shall actively encourage public disrespect for the Gods of Rome, or actively advocate the non-practice of the Religio Romana no matter what their personal beliefs
  4. The above declaration does not indicate individual censorship. Comments, questions about the Religio and its involvement with the State, or the members of its priesthood are encouraged as long as these do not escalate into a general public disturbance.

The Collegium Pontificum hereby states the process under which the 'blasphemy clause' may be invoked by the Collegium Pontificum:

Citizens, or guests of Nova Roma violating the above provisions are subject to the following action:

  1. The College will issue a public notice to the person or persons in question, informing them that a continuation of certain actions may result in a complaint of 'blasphemy' being lodged against them. Such a notice would be considered a warning, under which time no official action would be taken. Should the behavior in question cease during the following 24 hour period the matter shall be considered closed.
  2. If the offender stops only later to resume, the 24 hour period will no apply and the College will be free to react at once.
  3. If the offender continues past the 24 hour period, a formal complaint shall be issued to the Nova Roma Senate and Praetors, requesting official civil intervention in the matter. The Pontiffs will be considered witnesses, as well as any citizens who were witnesses to the offence, for the hearing purpose.
  4. Action will be determined by the sitting Praetor at a hearing, and may include banishment, fines, depravation of certain freedoms (i.e., list moderation) at their discretion. A magistrate who violates the clause and the warning, may be removed from office by Senatorial decree before any hearing may be conducted. Failure of such a decree, shall mean the magistrate will not be tried while sitting, but at end of his term shall immediately be subject to his hearing. A Pontiff or Priest who violates the clause shall be removed from office by majority vote of the College and turned over to the Praetors for their hearing. If not convicted, they may petition for reinstatement.
    Valete!
--
"Qua(e) patres difficillime
adepti sunt nolite
turpiter relinquere" -
Monumentum Bradfordis, Tamaropoli, in civitate Massaciuseta
(Bradford Monument, Plymouth, MA)

Check out my books on Goodreads: <a href="http://www.goodreads.com/profile/Valerianus?utm_source=email_widget">http://www.goodreads.com/profile/Valerianus</a>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 57812 From: Maior Date: 2008-09-29
Subject: Re: religio?
Maior Varroni sal;
amice, free speech is Roman, it is utterly unRoman to censor
speech.
Let Claudio worship the Judaean Juppiter's erzatz son, frankly I
think it is hilarious.
Interestingly he made me think about today, which is this
Juppiter's holiday, after reading a great deal about Greco-Roman
collegia, dining associations, I realize that when the temple cult in
Judaea was destroyed, the meal in honour of the god being celebrated
became the main event.
So it's very interesting to me today, when my secular family
celebrates a holiday with a meal to see this as a true Roman practice:)
Don't get angry; understand he feels threatened by us.On another
point, he mentions that I either live in a skyscraper or a kibbutz.

Actually I live on a small fundus in a small university town in the
U.S. South. The Roman ideal. Like a good Roman my father was in
business, tilled the soil and went to war. And now I will learn how to
till my agellus
in a good ancient Roman fashion.
bene vale in pacem deorum
M. Hortensia Maior
sacerdos Mentis



In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "philippe cardon"
<philippe.cardon01@...> wrote:
>
> Marinus, the sacred and invoilable law i follow is the respect of
the Gods above all
>
> impity is when someone follow anothers gods that the state gods so
this crime is very well attested here and our duty to placate this
outrageous words and way of life is very well attested too
>
> how could the gods love our sacrifice and parayers if we accept
people among us who speak against them so in such derotatory way?
>
> such christian superstitio must be cutt off from the head to the
bottom vowed to Dii infernii as were the vestales who broken their
vows of castity
>
> odium humani generis, that is the christain crime
>
> a claim must grow from all citizens, i call you all, to your altasr
to offer the propitiatory sacrifice we must offer to the gods because
gods' anger come upon us they will again leave the state and the city
and we have broken the pax deorum accepting such crime
> it is such a danger for the republic when citizens speal agaings the
religio and the gods
>
> varro
>
> varro
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 57813 From: Titus Flavius Aquila Date: 2008-09-29
Subject: AW: [Nova-Roma] religiones romanae?
Salvete omnes,
 
as I know ACC, Claudio, from previous contacts I have contacted him to clarify the issue and for my own understanding. As there might be a
missunderstanding concerning his aims and his philosophy . As I do not share and support his philosophy in all details, I do understand his point of view. This Main List is here for the free speech of our citizens. I will defend this right by all means.
 
ACC has responded to me according to my questions as follows.
 
Optime valete
Titus Flavius Aquila
Tribunus Plebis Nova Roma

 
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Monday, September 29, 2008 5:31 PM
Subject: AW: [Nova-Roma] religiones romanae?

Salve dear Claudio,
 
for my personal understanding. Are you Christian or follower of the Religio Romana, I am confused ?
Cl: My parents were catholic. I love nature and her gods.
Th: I thought you would be very interessted to re-establish the Vestales ?
Cl: I practiced cultus privata (someone stoled my pics and statues...) and would like to see Vestales and the templum flame again in Roma and her Pantheon for all gods and cultus deorum publici, but now the real existing Roman religio is the owner of the Roman traditional cultus deorum (Catholic Church is the only Roman religio now). Those cultus still exist in that religio and Roma is aeterna.
 
Th: Maybe the whole discussion on the Main List is a terrible misunderstanding.
Cl: Maybe
 Optime vale
Vale
Titus Flavius Aquila

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 57814 From: Lucia Livia Plauta Date: 2008-09-29
Subject: Re: religio?
--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Colin Brodd" <magisterbrodd@...> wrote:
>
Salvete omnes,
personally as of now I'm going to stop feeding the troll.
I think what Guzzo said could justify invoking the "blasphemy clause",
but I also think placing him under trial would do no good and only
contribute to esclating the situation and stirring more unrest.
Really, the best policy is just to ignore him, and he probably will
just disappear again.
Valete,
Livia

> Gaius Tullius Valerianus Germanicus omnibus S.P.D.
>
> Gnaeus Equitius Marinus has a point. We have laws relating to charges of
> blasphemy and impiety. Below is the text of the decretum against
blasphemy.
> *Note bene *part 4 of the interpretation: "*Comments, questions
about the
> Religio and its involvement with the State, or the members of its
priesthood
> are encouraged as long as these do not escalate into a general public
> disturbance." *So I guess the question is - has this become a public
> disturbance? Is there value in this discussion, o Quirites, or is
there not?
> If not, does the Collegium Pontificum wish to invoke the "blasphemy
clause,"
> bringin the matter to the Senate and Praetors with the possible
penalties
> listed (*"banishment, fines, depravation of certain freedoms (i.e., list
> moderation)"*)* *
> **
> I would like to add that while I generally do not approve of silencing a
> citizen who wishes to speak his mind, there seems (to me) to be
almost no
> value in discussing whether the Catholic church has any right to
think of
> itself as "religio Romana." This is escalating, and while we are free to
> simply ignore it, should we have to? Many feel the gods themselves
are being
> defamed. The Collegium Pontificum is convened at the moment, I believe -
> does anyone wish to raise the issue?
>
> The test of ther decretum:
> *By this decretum, the **Collegium
> Pontificum*<http://novaroma.org/nr/Collegium_Pontificum_%28Nova_Roma%29>
> * officially clarifies the 'blasphemy clause' contained in the Nova
Roma **
> Constitution* <http://novaroma.org/nr/Constitution_%28Nova_Roma%29>*
located
> in the Public Institutions Section, VI (a): *
> *"Magistrates, Senators, and citizens need not be practitioners of the
> Religio Romana, but may not engage in any public activity that
intentionally
> blasphemes or defames the Gods, the **Religio
> Romana*<http://novaroma.org/nr/Religio_Romana>
> *, or its practitioners." *
>
> *The College of Pontiffs declare the intent of the above constitutional
> phrase to mean the following: *
>
> 1. *The Religio Romana will not come under attack with intent to
remove
> or replace the Religio Romana as the State religion of Nova Roma;
and that
> the Religio Romana shall not be deliberately slandered, defamed,
or mocked
> with intent to undermine its position as the State Religion of
Nova Roma.
> *
> 2. *No elected official shall use their elected powers or political
> status as a means of working to undermine, remove, or replace the
Religio
> Romana as the State Religion of Nova Roma. *
> 3. *No Citizen or Magistrate shall actively encourage public
disrespect
> for the Gods of Rome, or actively advocate the non-practice of
the Religio
> Romana no matter what their personal beliefs *
> 4. *The above declaration does not indicate individual censorship.
> Comments, questions about the Religio and its involvement with
the State, or
> the members of its priesthood are encouraged as long as these do not
> escalate into a general public disturbance. *
>
> *The Collegium Pontificum hereby states the process under which the
> 'blasphemy clause' may be invoked by the Collegium Pontificum: *
>
> *Citizens, or guests of Nova Roma violating the above provisions are
subject
> to the following action: *
>
> 1. *The College will issue a public notice to the person or
persons in
> question, informing them that a continuation of certain actions
may result
> in a complaint of 'blasphemy' being lodged against them. Such a
notice would
> be considered a warning, under which time no official action
would be taken.
> Should the behavior in question cease during the following 24
hour period
> the matter shall be considered closed. *
> 1. *If the offender stops only later to resume, the 24 hour period
> will no apply and the College will be free to react at once. *
> 2. *If the offender continues past the 24 hour period, a formal
> complaint shall be issued to the Nova Roma Senate and Praetors,
> requesting
> official civil intervention in the matter. The Pontiffs will be
> considered
> witnesses, as well as any citizens who were witnesses to the
offence, for
> the hearing purpose. *
> 2. *Action will be determined by the sitting
> **Praetor*<http://novaroma.org/nr/Praetor_%28Nova_Roma%29>
> * at a hearing, and may include banishment, fines, depravation of
certain
> freedoms (i.e., list moderation) at their discretion. *
> 3. *A magistrate who violates the clause and the warning, may be
removed
> from office by Senatorial decree before any hearing may be conducted.
> Failure of such a decree, shall mean the magistrate will not be
tried while
> sitting, but at end of his term shall immediately be subject to
his hearing.
> *
> 4. *A Pontiff or Priest who violates the clause shall be removed from
> office by majority vote of the College and turned over to the
Praetors for
> their hearing. If not convicted, they may petition for
reinstatement. *
>
>
> Valete!
> --
> "Qua(e) patres difficillime
> adepti sunt nolite
> turpiter relinquere" -
> Monumentum Bradfordis, Tamaropoli, in civitate Massaciuseta
> (Bradford Monument, Plymouth, MA)
>
> Check out my books on Goodreads: <a href="
> http://www.goodreads.com/profile/Valerianus?utm_source=email_widget">
> http://www.goodreads.com/profile/Valerianus</a>
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 57815 From: PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@aol.com Date: 2008-09-29
Subject: Re: religio?
Aurelianus Varro sal.
 
I do not see a blasphemy here because Appius Claudius appears to write from ignorance and misunderstanding.  As English is not his mother tongue, it is likely that there is confusion in others understanding of his words.  I have yet to read anything from him that suggests he is committing an impiety.  Until such time as he specifically communicates words that deliberately suggest actions undermining the NR Constitution or the priestly decreta, I believe that he should be allowed to speak his peace.
 
Some of his ideas are poorly worded but there is much that he writes that have some place in the thought of Romans long past.  Those who found religio in retired groves, wave blasted arches,  deep lakes, and springs that sprang from the Earth; these places inspired a feeling of religio among the old ones.
 
The CP is currently in the midst of voting to improve the Religio Romana and organization of the sacred colleges.  Let not a few ill-written words cause feelings that can be easily put aside.
 
Vale.
 
In a message dated 9/29/2008 8:15:11 A.M. Central Daylight Time, philippe.cardon01@... writes:

he marinus what is this right for guzzo to speak against the gods the religio and the priests? nobody have this right here because some awfull things like the &st and 2nd articles of the american bill of rights are not in use in NR as i know (or is Nr the same thing than the states?)
 
i see here a scandal an impiety something we need a piacculum from the collegium pontificium and the magistrates because it is a fight against the honor of the Gods so something blasphemous which call for reparation
 
varro





Looking for simple solutions to your real-life financial challenges? Check out WalletPop for the latest news and information, tips and calculators.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 57816 From: Patrick D. Owen Date: 2008-09-29
Subject: The Sacra et Religio
Fl. Galerius Aurelianus S.P.D.

I would like to offer a viewpoint how the practice of the Sacra et
Religio in Nova Roma is improving. This offering is purely personal
and is not ex officio of any office I hold in our organization.

One year ago, the Sacred Colleges was seriously locked into a pattern
of inaction. We had two augures that were in such conflict with one
another than no new ones could be elected. Several of the most
intelligent and responsible pontifices had become inactive or left
Nova Roma entirely for personal reasons. Reasons that were directly
connected to the inactivity of reform and progress. It was not a
situation that could endure and the Senate began steps to resolve the
issues that they perceived were holding up the recreation and
restoration of the Sacra et Religio.

With much drama, some individuals were removed from office by the CP,
others resigned, or left Nova Roma amid charges from the Praetores.
This was painful for some but it has resulted in change for the
better, in my opinion.

Currently, the CP is voting to add some new blood to its ranks &
better plans which show definite signs that the restoration and
recreation of the Sacra et Religio will move forward--a new calendar
for next year, clarification of the dies (days), new sacerdotes and
pontifices, plus other matters which are undergoing study and
discussion to bring the Sacra Publica back in line with the
institutions founded by Numa Pompilius. Not only is this definite
progress but almost no conflict is occurring with these changes. The
discussions and opinions are being offered with a civility that is
gratifying.

We, as citizens, are now seeing rites on the internet and YouTube
that give individuals some clear ideas about how Dii Immortales
should receive prayer and sacrifice.

As the sacred colleges grow in numbers, knowledge and influence, the
Priestly and Augural Books will be written. The individual cults
will likely flourish & there will be much more information available
for each person to use in their practice of the Sacra et Religio.

There is always the possibility that conflicts and drama may occur in
the future among the pontifices, augures, Vestals, and flamen but it
is less likely to occur than in former times.

I wish to publicly think all of those who have applied to the CP for
positions and for the information that they have offered as proof of
their knowledge and willingness to serve. I earnestly believe that
Nova Roma is on the right track to accomplish at least one of the
original goals of our founding.

Valete.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 57817 From: titus.aquila Date: 2008-09-30
Subject: Sodalitas proDIIS A Temple for the Gods in Rome, founded
Sodalitas proDIIS A Temple for the Gods in Rome, founded

Cives Romani, salvete.

the Gods are coming home, more than 1600 years after their public
worship had been forbidden by Theodosius I. in 391-392 / 1144 ab
urbe condita .

The long-term intent of this sodalitas is to provide a temple / or
templum to the Gods for the public worship of the Roman Gods in
Rome.

Rome is the urbs, it is the place to honor the gods and it will
ensure the rebirth of Romanitas thus benefiting Nova Roma as a
whole.

This sodalitas is devoted to the eternal Roman Gods .

Nova Roma is not just looking at the past but also to the future  !

May the Gods of Rome be propitious to us !

Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus , Censor  
Marcus Moravius Piscinus Horatianus , Maior Consul
Caeso Fabius Buteo Quintilianus, Princeps Senatus
Marcus Iulius Severus , Praetor
Marcus Octavius Corvus, Legatus Pro Praetore Provincia Sarmatia
Gaius Marius Basilius, civis provincia Germania
Lucius Iulius Regulus, civis provincia Mediatlantica
Titus Flavius Aquila , Tribunus Plebis Nova Roma

The founders of the sodalitas Pro Diis  A Temple for the Gods in
Rome.  

Given by our hands, XIX Kalendas, Septembres M. Moravio T. Iulio
cos. MMDCCLXI A U C.

Per the Lex Cassia de creatione sodalitatum, any group of citizens
may petition the Senate to create a sodalitas. The group should form
itself informally and operate for six months. After that the Senate
will consider recognizing it.

The sodalitas has currently 11 members and the first milestones have
been reached and others are on their way to be finalized

A proposal for a project plan
A Charter for the sodalitas
A mail list for discussions has been created
A website for the sodalitas is currently under construction
Regional coordinators will promote the project sodalitas proDIIS in
their home contries/regions

The construction of a Roman Temple today, is first of all a civic
duty, a materialization of our Values. FROM ideas expressed in
Internet via flow of Megabyte,TO marble, stones, columns, to follow
our Roman ancestors .

A Nova Roman Temple in Rome will be our place to meet, to discuss,
to feel at home. And for our Roman State will be a preferred place
to perform the State rituals required in our calendar.

We would like to ask all interested citizens to join, support and to
unite for this great, important project . This project will give to
all citizens and amici of Nova Roma the opportunity to help to
create and build a temple for the eternal Gods of Rome.

There is a lot of work to be done, but the Roman Gods will help us.

All civis and amici (friends) of Nova Roma are invited to join the
sodalitas by making an application to the Collegium of the
sodalitas, by providing their Citizen Name, their provincia, and
their contact email address.  


Di immortales vobis faveant  !


Optime valete
Collegium sodalitas proDIIS
Titus Flavius Aquila
Gaius Marius Basilius
Marcus Octavius Corvus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 57818 From: Steve Moore Date: 2008-09-30
Subject: Re: Sodalitas proDIIS A Temple for the Gods in Rome, founded
M. Valerius Potitus T. Flavio Aquinae omnibus SPD.

Salvete. This is an excellent effort; this matter has been the subject
of discussion in our oppidum, and I'm excited to see a group of
citizens banding together to work to this goal.

I would like to make application to be a member of the sodalitas. My
email address is valerius.potitus@.... I am one of the Aediles
of Oppidum Fluminis Gilae, the first oppidum in the Western
hemisphere. We live in the province of America Austroccidentalis.

May Ianus Pater, the god of beginnings, bless this sodalitas.

Valete.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 57819 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2008-09-30
Subject: Rudimenta Latina course
Rudimenta Latina course A. Tullia Scholastica quiritibus, sociis, peregrinisque bonae voluntatis S.P.D.

    Enrollment is now closed in the Rudimenta Latina course, which began officially today.  All registered students should visit the course website to read the course materials.  

    Students wishing to register in Sermo Latinus I or Sermo Latinus II should contact me for the enrollment key.  Several are waiting for processing to access the Sermo I site ( I have been away at Roman Days).  The Sermo II site is now ready for enrollment; those wishing to take this course should contact me, as a couple already have.

Valete.
    
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 57820 From: Titus Flavius Aquila Date: 2008-09-30
Subject: AW: [Nova-Roma] Re: Sodalitas proDIIS A Temple for the Gods in Rome,
T.Flavius Aquila  M.Valeri Potito sal.
 
Thank you very much. It is an honour for us, that you would like to join us.
   
You would need to provide your Roman Name, your provincia and your eMail address.
You have sent this information already, thus I will bring your request to the Collegium.
Within a day , you should receive an invite to the sodalitas mail List and we will welcome
you and the other applicants.
 
 
Optime vale
Titus Flavius Aquila
Collegium sodalitas proDIIS


----- Ursprüngliche Mail ----
Von: Steve Moore <astrobear@...>
An: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Gesendet: Dienstag, den 30. September 2008, 08:59:04 Uhr
Betreff: [Nova-Roma] Re: Sodalitas proDIIS A Temple for the Gods in Rome, founded

M. Valerius Potitus T. Flavio Aquinae omnibus SPD.

Salvete. This is an excellent effort; this matter has been the subject
of discussion in our oppidum, and I'm excited to see a group of
citizens banding together to work to this goal.

I would like to make application to be a member of the sodalitas. My
email address is valerius.potitus@ gmail.com. I am one of the Aediles
of Oppidum Fluminis Gilae, the first oppidum in the Western
hemisphere. We live in the province of America Austroccidentalis.

May Ianus Pater, the god of beginnings, bless this sodalitas.

Valete.


Group: Nova-Roma Message: 57821 From: marcushoratius Date: 2008-09-30
Subject: Pridie Kalendae Octobrae: Asculum
M. Moravius Piscinus cultoribus Deorum et omnibus salutem plurimam
dicit: Mercurius eloquentiam in nos communicet.

Hodie est die pristine Kalendas Octobres; haec dies comitialis est:

"May You, Mercurius, make plump the richness of my house and all else
within, save my natural talents, and as usual, may You remain the
primary guardian over me." ~ Q. Horatius Flaccus, Satires 2.6.14-15


AUC 474 / 279 BCE: The Battle of Asculum, King Pyrrhus confronted by
Decius Mus and Publius Sulpicius

The first day of the battle saw Pyrrhus emerging from his line of
march into a rough, wooded area. Ahead of him lay the Aufidus where
the river was swift and deep and the steep banks posed problems for
his army to cross. Yet he could not exactly turn aside and head
further into Italy towards Rome since two consular armies had taken
up position on the far side of the river and would be left astride
his line of communications.

"Consequently, Pyrrhus found himself obliged to fight another battle,
and after recuperating his army he marched to the city of Asculum,
where he engaged the Romans. Here, however, he was forced into
regions where his cavalry could not operate, and upon a river with
swift current and wooded banks, so that his elephants could not
charge and engage the enemy's phalanx. Therefore, after many had been
wounded and slain, for the time being the struggle was ended by the
coming of night." ~ Plutarch, Life of Pyrrhus 21.5

On the following day, Pyrrhus had slipped further down river to a
more level plane where his cavalry and elephants might better
maneuver and where the Aufidus did not pose as great a problem to his
army's crossing. Dionysius describes the battle in a rhetorical
manner, with heralds arranging the time when the battle should be
fought and focusing much of his attention on the ox-driven war carts
that the Romans attempted (unsuccessfully) to counter Pyrrhus'
elephants.

"King Pyrrhus gave the Macedonian phalanx the first place on the
right wing and placed next to it the Italiot mercenaries Â… in the
middle of the battle-line he stationed the (Greek) mercenariesÂ… and
finally the Samnites, who constituted the left wing. Of the horse,
he stationed the Samnite, Thessalian and Bruttian squadrons and the
Tarentine mercenary force upon the right wing, and the Ambraciot,
Lucanian and Tarentine squadrons and the Greek mercenariesÂ… on the
left. The light-armed troops and the elephants he divided into two
groups and placed them behind both wings, at a reasonable distance,
in a position slightly elevated above the plain. He himself,
surrounded by the royal agema, as it was called, of picked horsemen,
about two thousand in number, was behind the battle-line, so as to
aid promptly any of his troops in turn that might be hard pressed.

"The consuls arrayed the first,legion on their left wing facing the
Macedonian phalanx Â… Next to the first legion, the third, over
against the Tarentine phalanx with its white shields and the Bruttian
and Lucanian allied forces. Adjoining the third army they placed the
fourth, facing the Molossians, Chaonians and Thesprotians; and the
second legion on the right wing opposite the mercenaries from Greece
and the Samnite phalanx that was equipped with oblong shields. The
Latins, Campanians, Umbrians, Volscians, Marrucini, Peligni,
Ferentani, and their other subjects they divided into four divisions
and mingled them with the Roman legions, in order that no part of
their lines might be weak. And dividing the cavalry, both their own
and that of their allies, they placed it on both wings. Outside the
line they stationed the light-armed troops and the wagons, three
hundred in number, which they had got ready for the battle against
the elephants. These wagons had upright beams on which were mounted
movable traverse poles that could be swung round as quick as thought
in any direction one might wish, and on the ends of the poles there
were either tridents or sword-like spikes or scythes all of iron; or
again they had cranes that hurled down heavy grappling-irons. Many
of the poles had attached to them and projecting in front of the
wagons fire-bearing grapnels wrapped in tow that had been liberally
daubed with pitch, which men standing on the wagons were to set afire
as soon as they came near the elephants and then rain blows with them
upon the trunks and faces of the beasts. Furthermore, standing on the
wagons, which were four-wheeled, were many also of the light-armed
troops - bowmen, hurlers of stones and slingers who threw iron
caltrops; and on the ground beside the wagons there were still more
men.

"This was the battle order of the two armies that had taken the
field. The forces on the king's side numbered 70,000 foot, of whom
the Greeks who had crossed the Ionian gulf amounted to 16,000; on the
Roman side there were more than 70,000, about 20,000 of them being
from Rome itself. Of horse the Romans had about 8,000, while Pyrrhus
had slightly more, as well as nineteen elephants." ~ Dionysius of
Halicarnassus, Roman Antiquities 20.1

Frontius, on the other hand, gave more reasonable figures than
Dionysius' inflated numbers. "We are informed that there were forty
thousand men on each side (Strategemata 2.3.21)."

"When the signals for battle were hoisted, the soldiers first chanted
their war songs, and then, raising the battle-cry to Enyalius,
advanced to the fray, engaged and fought, displaying all their skill
in arms. The cavalry stationed upon both wings, knowing before hand
in what tactics they had the advantage over the enemy, resorted to
those tactics, ... The fighting of the infantry was in some respects
similar to it, ... but different in details. For the right wing of
each army was the stronger one, the left being weaker."

Pyrrhus sent his elephants in where his line was most in danger of
collapsing. The Romans countered with these rather strange ox carts,
which only briefly managed to check their progress. Pyrrhus had
screens of lightly armed troops surrounding the elephants, where as
the Roman war carts seem to have had too few men to really engage the
elephants. They were soon beaten back, causing confusing in the
Roman line just as the elephants were about to engage them. Just at
the same, however, ...

"The Lucanians and Bruttians arrayed in the middle of the king's
battle-line, after fighting for no great while, turned to flight when
repulsed by the fourth Roman legion. When once these gave way and
their part of the line was broken through, the Tarentines also, who
had their station next to them, did not remain, but they too turned
their backs to the enemy and fled."

Pyrrhus counter-attacked with his cavalry reserve, which apparently
stablized his line. However in the meantine, "there was a manifest
intervention of the divine power on the side of the Romans." Around
four-thousand Daunians, together with around 300 cavalry, finally
arrived on the scene of the battle. Allied with Rome, they found
themselves behind Pyrrhus' lines and near his camp. So they
assaulted the Epiriote camp, burning it and siezing Pyrrhus' baggage
train. He again countered with cavalry and elephants, but too late
to save his baggage or to prevent the firing of his camp from
discouraging his men.

"The Romans, having no opportunity for sidelong shifts and counter-
movements, as on the previous day, were obliged to engage on level
ground and front to front; and being anxious to repulse the enemy's
men-at-arms before their elephants came up, they fought fiercely with
their swords against the Macedonian spears, reckless of their lives
and thinking only of wounding and slaying, while caring naught for
what they suffered. After a long time, however, as we are told, they
began to be driven back at the point where Pyrrhus himself was
pressing hard upon his opponents; but the greatest havoc was wrought
by the furious strength of the elephants, since the valour of the
Romans was of no avail in fighting them." ~ Plutarch, Life of Pyrrhus
21.6-7

As night approached the bloody and indecisive battle came to a halt.
The Romans withdrew to their camp.

"The forces of Pyrrhus, having lost their tents, pack-animals and
slaves, and all their baggage, encamped upon a height, where they
spent the following night under the open sky, without either baggage
or attendance and not well supplied with even the necessary food, so
that many wounded men actually perished, when they might still have
been saved had they received assistance and care. Such was the
outcome of the second battle between the Romans and Pyrrhus, near the
town of Asculum." ~ Dionysius of Halicarnassus, Roman Antiquities
20.3

Plutarch placed the Roman battle losses at 6,000 and those of Pyrrhus
at 3,505, "according to the king's own commentaries." Frontius
instead said, "Half of Pyrrhus's army was lost; on the Roman side
only five thousand." He must have been refering to those that
Pyrrhus had brought with him to Italy and that had been lost over the
course of his years of campaigning in Italy and Sicily. No account
is give for the loss of Italian allies on either side, but the battle
was clearly a tactical defeat for the Romans. However it was Asculum
that convinced Pyrrhus to abandon his ambitions in Hesperia and
return to Epiros

"The two armies separated; and we are told that Pyrrhus said to one
who was congratulating him on his victory, "If we are victorious in
one more battle with the Romans, we shall be utterly ruined." ~
Plutarch, Life of Pyrrhus 21.10


Our thought for today comes from Epicurus, Philosophical Discourses
29:

"Of our desires some are natural and necessary, others are natural
but not necessary; and others are neither natural nor necessary, but
are due to groundless opinion."
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 57822 From: Gaius Petronius Dexter Date: 2008-09-30
Subject: Re : [Nova-Roma] Sodalitas proDIIS A Temple for the Gods in Rome, fo
C. Petronius Quiritibus s.p.d.,
 
(...)
> The construction of a Roman Temple today, is first of all a
civic
> duty, a materialization of our Values. FROM ideas expressed
in
> Internet via flow of Megabyte,TO marble, stones, columns, to
follow
> our Roman ancestors .
 
If we want to built or restore a temple in Rome, I suppose we will not do that as an archeological society but as cultores deorum. Therefore a first step of this project would be to make "cultus deorum" a religion in Rome and in the world.
 
I guess that is not gained in advance.
 
What is the plan to do the cultus deorum an official religion? In what international juridiction can we have legal proceedings to get the recognition of our religion?
 
> A Nova Roman Temple in Rome
will be our place to meet, to discuss,
> to feel at home. And for our
Roman State will be a preferred place
> to perform the State rituals
required in our calendar.
 
I propose this temple be the temple of the goddess Roma. Because if we choice an other god, we will not can perform the rituals in our calendars. For example, if we choice to built a temple to the Capitoline Trias, or another god or goddess the days to perform the rituals will be limited at this Triaden or this god, or this goddess, while a temple vowed and consacred to Roma will can receive the everyday rituals. Roma is also a goddess and on of her temple was built by the emperor Hadrian, it was a temple with two "cellae", in one Roma in other Venus. Parts of this temple now are in the convent S. Francisca Romana and the Antiquarium Forense. North-east from the Arch of Titus.
 
Vale.
 
C. Petronius Dexter
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 57823 From: Colin Brodd Date: 2008-09-30
Subject: Re: Sodalitas proDIIS A Temple for the Gods in Rome, founded
Gaius Tullius Valerianus Germanicus sodalitati S.P.D.
 
I am definitely interested in joining the new sodalitas! I would like to apply for membership!
 
Citizen Name: Gaius Tullius Valerianus Germanicus
Provincia: Nova Britannia
Contact e-mail: magisterbrodd@...
 
Di nobis faveant!

On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 2:39 AM, titus.aquila <titus.aquila@...> wrote:

Sodalitas proDIIS A Temple for the Gods in Rome, founded

Cives Romani, salvete.

the Gods are coming home, more than 1600 years after their public
worship had been forbidden by Theodosius I. in 391-392 / 1144 ab
urbe condita .

The long-term intent of this sodalitas is to provide a temple / or
templum to the Gods for the public worship of the Roman Gods in
Rome.

Rome is the urbs, it is the place to honor the gods and it will
ensure the rebirth of Romanitas thus benefiting Nova Roma as a
whole.

This sodalitas is devoted to the eternal Roman Gods .

Nova Roma is not just looking at the past but also to the future  !

May the Gods of Rome be propitious to us !

Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus , Censor  
Marcus Moravius Piscinus Horatianus , Maior Consul
Caeso Fabius Buteo Quintilianus, Princeps Senatus
Marcus Iulius Severus , Praetor
Marcus Octavius Corvus, Legatus Pro Praetore Provincia Sarmatia
Gaius Marius Basilius, civis provincia Germania
Lucius Iulius Regulus, civis provincia Mediatlantica
Titus Flavius Aquila , Tribunus Plebis Nova Roma

The founders of the sodalitas Pro Diis  A Temple for the Gods in
Rome.  

Given by our hands, XIX Kalendas, Septembres M. Moravio T. Iulio
cos. MMDCCLXI A U C.

Per the Lex Cassia de creatione sodalitatum, any group of citizens
may petition the Senate to create a sodalitas. The group should form
itself informally and operate for six months. After that the Senate
will consider recognizing it.

The sodalitas has currently 11 members and the first milestones have
been reached and others are on their way to be finalized

A proposal for a project plan
A Charter for the sodalitas
A mail list for discussions has been created
A website for the sodalitas is currently under construction
Regional coordinators will promote the project sodalitas proDIIS in
their home contries/regions

The construction of a Roman Temple today, is first of all a civic
duty, a materialization of our Values. FROM ideas expressed in
Internet via flow of Megabyte,TO marble, stones, columns, to follow
our Roman ancestors .

A Nova Roman Temple in Rome will be our place to meet, to discuss,
to feel at home. And for our Roman State will be a preferred place
to perform the State rituals required in our calendar.

We would like to ask all interested citizens to join, support and to
unite for this great, important project . This project will give to
all citizens and amici of Nova Roma the opportunity to help to
create and build a temple for the eternal Gods of Rome.

There is a lot of work to be done, but the Roman Gods will help us.

All civis and amici (friends) of Nova Roma are invited to join the
sodalitas by making an application to the Collegium of the
sodalitas, by providing their Citizen Name, their provincia, and
their contact email address.  

Di immortales vobis faveant  !

Optime valete
Collegium sodalitas proDIIS
Titus Flavius Aquila
Gaius Marius Basilius
Marcus Octavius Corvus




--
"Qua(e) patres difficillime
adepti sunt nolite
turpiter relinquere" -
Monumentum Bradfordis, Tamaropoli, in civitate Massaciuseta
(Bradford Monument, Plymouth, MA)

Check out my books on Goodreads: <a href="http://www.goodreads.com/profile/Valerianus?utm_source=email_widget">http://www.goodreads.com/profile/Valerianus</a>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 57824 From: Titus Flavius Aquila Date: 2008-09-30
Subject: AW: [Nova-Roma] Sodalitas proDIIS A Temple for the Gods in Rome, fou
T.Flavius Aquila C.Tulli Valeriano Germanico S.P.D.
 
It is an honour for us Legatus, that you would like to join.
   
I will bring your request to the Collegium.
 
Within a day, you should receive an invite to the sodalitas mail List and we will welcome
you officially.
   
Optime vale
Titus Flavius Aquila for the
Collegium sodalitas proDIIS



----- Ursprüngliche Mail ----
Von: Colin Brodd <magisterbrodd@...>
An: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Gesendet: Dienstag, den 30. September 2008, 20:30:24 Uhr
Betreff: Re: [Nova-Roma] Sodalitas proDIIS A Temple for the Gods in Rome, founded

Gaius Tullius Valerianus Germanicus sodalitati S.P.D.
 
I am definitely interested in joining the new sodalitas! I would like to apply for membership!
 
Citizen Name: Gaius Tullius Valerianus Germanicus
Provincia: Nova Britannia
Contact e-mail: magisterbrodd@ gmail.com
 
Di nobis faveant!

On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 2:39 AM, titus.aquila <titus.aquila@ yahoo.de> wrote:

Sodalitas proDIIS A Temple for the Gods in Rome, founded

Cives Romani, salvete.

the Gods are coming home, more than 1600 years after their public
worship had been forbidden by Theodosius I. in 391-392 / 1144 ab
urbe condita .

The long-term intent of this sodalitas is to provide a temple / or
templum to the Gods for the public worship of the Roman Gods in
Rome.

Rome is the urbs, it is the place to honor the gods and it will
ensure the rebirth of Romanitas thus benefiting Nova Roma as a
whole.

This sodalitas is devoted to the eternal Roman Gods .

Nova Roma is not just looking at the past but also to the future  !

May the Gods of Rome be propitious to us !

Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus , Censor  
Marcus Moravius Piscinus Horatianus , Maior Consul
Caeso Fabius Buteo Quintilianus, Princeps Senatus
Marcus Iulius Severus , Praetor
Marcus Octavius Corvus, Legatus Pro Praetore Provincia Sarmatia
Gaius Marius Basilius, civis provincia Germania
Lucius Iulius Regulus, civis provincia Mediatlantica
Titus Flavius Aquila , Tribunus Plebis Nova Roma

The founders of the sodalitas Pro Diis  A Temple for the Gods in
Rome.  

Given by our hands, XIX Kalendas, Septembres M. Moravio T. Iulio
cos. MMDCCLXI A U C.

Per the Lex Cassia de creatione sodalitatum, any group of citizens
may petition the Senate to create a sodalitas. The group should form
itself informally and operate for six months. After that the Senate
will consider recognizing it.

The sodalitas has currently 11 members and the first milestones have
been reached and others are on their way to be finalized

A proposal for a project plan
A Charter for the sodalitas
A mail list for discussions has been created
A website for the sodalitas is currently under construction
Regional coordinators will promote the project sodalitas proDIIS in
their home contries/regions

The construction of a Roman Temple today, is first of all a civic
duty, a materialization of our Values. FROM ideas expressed in
Internet via flow of Megabyte,TO marble, stones, columns, to follow
our Roman ancestors .

A Nova Roman Temple in Rome will be our place to meet, to discuss,
to feel at home. And for our Roman State will be a preferred place
to perform the State rituals required in our calendar.

We would like to ask all interested citizens to join, support and to
unite for this great, important project . This project will give to
all citizens and amici of Nova Roma the opportunity to help to
create and build a temple for the eternal Gods of Rome.

There is a lot of work to be done, but the Roman Gods will help us.

All civis and amici (friends) of Nova Roma are invited to join the
sodalitas by making an application to the Collegium of the
sodalitas, by providing their Citizen Name, their provincia, and
their contact email address.  

Di immortales vobis faveant  !

Optime valete
Collegium sodalitas proDIIS
Titus Flavius Aquila
Gaius Marius Basilius
Marcus Octavius Corvus




--
"Qua(e) patres difficillime
adepti sunt nolite
turpiter relinquere" -
Monumentum Bradfordis, Tamaropoli, in civitate Massaciuseta
(Bradford Monument, Plymouth, MA)

Check out my books on Goodreads: <a href="http://www.goodread s.com/profile/ Valerianus? utm_source= email_widget">http://www.goodread s.com/profile/ Valerianus</a>

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 57825 From: Andreas Lachmann Date: 2008-09-30
Subject: Re: Circenses Romani SEMI and FINALS results ! Chariot race Raetia
Salve Titus Flavius Aquila,

thanks for your response.And yes I have great memories of the old country and still feel strongly about it.
The video clips were interesting,even though the costuming was very Hollywood.I have to go to the "Bread and Games" at Xanten
next time I visit Germania,and/or do a Limes march with fellow re-enactors.

Vale,D.Arm.Brvtvs




To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
From: titus.aquila@...
Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2008 13:25:13 +0000
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Circenses Romani SEMI and FINALS results ! Chariot race Raetia and Kalkriese Publius Quinctilius Varus


 Salve Decimus Arminius Brutus ,

 

no problem, we are all very busy. I hope that you still have some good feelings about your home country from the past.

 

Unfortunately I have not found a website of the event in Raetia, but I was able to find two videos of the race. I hope they do work out.

 

http://www.myvideo. de/watch/ 5002492/Roemisch es_Wagenrennen_ Pfaffenhofen_ 2

 

http://www.youtube. com/watch? v=t4pMso54iBM

 

There are several events planned for the 2000th Anniversary of the battle of legatus Augusti pro praetore Germnia Publius Quinctilius Varus  against Arminius. Nowadays , experts state that the battle took place in Kalkriese. I have added the website of the museum of Kalkriese which lists some events for 2762 a.u.c.

 

http://www.kalkries e-varusschlacht. de/index/ getlang/en

 

 

Optime vale

Titus Flavius Aquila

Legatus Pro Praetore Provincia Germania

 

 

 



----- Ursprüngliche Mail ----
Von: Andreas Lachmann <pagermanicvs@ hotmail.com>
An: nova-roma@yahoogrou ps.com
Gesendet: Mittwoch, den 24. September 2008, 23:41:48 Uhr
Betreff: RE: AW: [Nova-Roma] Circenses Romani SEMI and FINALS results !


Salve Titus Flavius Aquila,
please excuse my taking so long to respond to your kind words. I've just returned from a re-enactment weekend and things got very busy for me.
I must inform you that while I'm a born and bred German from Hamburg,I do now live Down Under in Australia.
I found your comments about the chariot race in Raetia very interesting. Have you got a link to photos of the event?And what about the upcoming
2000th Anniversary of the Teutoburger Wald battle next year.Are there any plans to commemorate that momentus historical event ?
Vale D.Arm.Brvtvs


To: Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com
From: titus.aquila@ yahoo.de
Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2008 13:00:08 +0000
Subject: AW: [Nova-Roma] Circenses Romani SEMI and FINALS results !


Salve Decimus Arminius Brutus ,
 
I am especially proud that the team Germanica won !
 
Well done team Germanica !
 
 
By the by we just recently had an event in Germania , in Raetia,  a chariot race ,where 16 chariots and 100 horses where
involved. Maybe the provincia Germania will become a proud sponsor of this event in the future.
 
Optime valete
Titus Flavius Aquila
Legatus Pro Praetore Provincia Germania

 

----- Ursprüngliche Mail ----
Von: Andreas Lachmann <pagermanicvs@ hotmail.com>
An: nova-roma@yahoogrou ps.com
Gesendet: Donnerstag, den 18. September 2008, 14:15:32 Uhr
Betreff: RE: [Nova-Roma] Circenses Romani SEMI and FINALS results !


Salvete,

as the overjoyed owner of the winning chariot I wish to say a few words.
First, I wish to dedicate our victory to Iuppiter and Minerva.
Second, I wish to thank all those responsible for organizing such wonderful games.
Further thanks are due to all the good people involved in team Germanica.My driver Anthropophagus
had a shaky  start to his career in Rome,crashing in his very first race.And after we caught him eating one of the stable boys
things really hit rock bottom.But he overcame this controversy with a lot of hard work and dedication and he now finally
took his place in the winners circle,thanks to the help of Fortuna,

Valete bene,D.Arm.Brvtvs





To: Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com
From: albucius_aoe@ hotmail.com
Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2008 16:19:48 +0000
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Circenses Romani SEMI and FINALS results !

Omnibus lusoribus et quirit. s.d.

Another wonderful sunny afternoon on Rome today. Before you can read
the extensive reports, here are the results.

In semi-finals, as you sure remember, we had two Galli in the first
race and two Brasiliani in the second, with a perfect crossing
opposition btw Veneta and Russata factiones.

In the 1st semi, the new incomer, Stolo, sponsored by G. Petronius
Dexter, defeated his praefectus regionis L. Rutilius Minervalis and
his crew, Babientes driven by Scorpianus.

In the 2nd race, instead a good preparation, Fulgur II had to accept
Germanica's (auriga Antropophagus) superiority.

Not to enter the details, both races opened no contestation, both
winners, and specially in the Brasilian race, won with a good margin.

No small finals being run, the chariot having lost against the winner
of the whole Circenses gets the 3rd rank.

In finals, though young Stolo resisted well in the laps, the more
experienced Anthropophagus, who is ending his 4th contest in this
10th birthday year, had been the best in the straightaways. As for
the semi, there is no contestation.

The Circenses Romani final results are thus :

1. **Germanica (R)** **winner**
2. Incitatus (R) lost in finals
3. Fulgur II (V) lost in semi
4. Babientes (V) lost in semi
5. Aurora rubra (R) lost in qu. 2
6. Pilum (A) lost in qu. 4
7. Delectus consulis (V) lost in qu. 3
8. Ulixes geminus (V) lost in qu. 1
9. Vita brevis (A) lost in 1st round - 1st
10. Biga fortuna (A) lost in 1st round - 2nd
11. Rubidea (R) lost in 1st round - 3rd
12. Diem perdidi (Aed.) (acc.) lost in 1st round - 4th.

Even if our Romani have got less aurigae than for the Ludi Matutini
in June, it is has been a very interesting event.

As aedilis curulis, I am glad that we have now a group of confirmed
crews who have chased the prices all along the year.

We had also new patroni, who managed to put forward their chariots up
to the 2nd (Dexter) and 3rd (Lusitanus) ranks. This is a undeniable
success.

The other success is for factio Russata, who seems decided to make
this 10th Birthday year *its* year. Even if, for the Romani, the
three factiones have nearly presented the same number of crew, the
Russati have succeeded winning the jackpot with the 1st and 2nd ranks.

A last word about Factio Praesina: its presence seems lowering this
year.

Congratulations to all, first to Germanica and Incitatus russati team
and patroni, second to every owner who subscribed a chariot in the
Romani circenses. Thanks to the audience and to A. Tullia
Scholastica, who has, in the absence of Qu. Vitellius, done a good
coordination work for these Circenses.

Valete omnes !

P. Memmius Albucius
aed. cur.




Play now to win prizes for you and your friends! Are you a friend magnet?

____________ _________ _________ _________ _________ __
Do You Yahoo!?
Sie sind Spam leid? Yahoo! Mail verfügt über einen herausragenden Schutz gegen Massenmails.
http://mail. yahoo.com


Play now to win prizes for you and your friends! Are you a friend magnet?

____________ _________ _________ _________ _________ __
Do You Yahoo!?
Sie sind Spam leid? Yahoo! Mail verfügt über einen herausragenden Schutz gegen Massenmails.
http://mail. yahoo.com


Group: Nova-Roma Message: 57826 From: Lucia Livia Plauta Date: 2008-09-30
Subject: Re: Re : [Nova-Roma] Sodalitas proDIIS A Temple for the Gods in Rome
L. Livia Plauta C. Petronio omnibusque s.p.d.

You raise good points, but in order to make a temple it is not
necessary to make "cultus deorum" an official religion.
At the moment there are no cultores deorum in Rome except the people
of Movimento Tradizionale Romano, an organization which has links with
the far right.
In fact establishing a templum could be the first step in a process of
recruitment of more cultores, which could then lead to the
establishing of cultus deorum as a recognized religion.

As to what kind of temple, let's not forget that "templum" is only a
sacred precinct. I think for the moment we don't need an aedes (a
building), because the ceremonies have to take place in the open air
anyway, and we have no treasure to put in the building as yet.

In fact I think a portico would be the best solution, because it
allows to perform sacrifices in the open even if it rains, and it can
be dedicated to as many deities as we need. I'm thinking of something
like the "portico degli dei consenti" in the roman forum, but
personally I would favour a round shape, like the Pantheon.

However at the moment, as I said, there is no cultor deorum who is
also a citizen of Nova Roma in Rome, so there would be nobody to take
care of the temple and perform daily rituals. I suspect this problem
has to be solved before any move is made toward the establishing of
the temple.

Valete,
Livia

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Gaius Petronius Dexter"
<jfarnoud94@...> wrote:
>
> C. Petronius Quiritibus s.p.d.,
>
> (...)
> > The construction of a Roman Temple today, is first of all a civic
> > duty, a materialization of our Values. FROM ideas expressed in
> > Internet via flow of Megabyte,TO marble, stones, columns, to follow
> > our Roman ancestors .
>
> If we want to built or restore a temple in Rome, I suppose we will
not do that as an archeological society but as cultores deorum.
Therefore a first step of this project would be to make "cultus
deorum" a religion in Rome and in the world.
>
> I guess that is not gained in advance.
>
> What is the plan to do the cultus deorum an official religion? In
what international juridiction can we have legal proceedings to get
the recognition of our religion?
>
> > A Nova Roman Temple in Rome will be our place to meet, to discuss,
> > to feel at home. And for our Roman State will be a preferred place
> > to perform the State rituals required in our calendar.
>
> I propose this temple be the temple of the goddess Roma. Because if
we choice an other god, we will not can perform the rituals in our
calendars. For example, if we choice to built a temple to the
Capitoline Trias, or another god or goddess the days to perform the
rituals will be limited at this Triaden or this god, or this goddess,
while a temple vowed and consacred to Roma will can receive the
everyday rituals. Roma is also a goddess and on of her temple was
built by the emperor Hadrian, it was a temple with two "cellae", in
one Roma in other Venus. Parts of this temple now are in the convent
S. Francisca Romana and the Antiquarium Forense. North-east from the
Arch of Titus.
>
> Vale.
>
> C. Petronius Dexter
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 57827 From: Lyn Dowling Date: 2008-09-30
Subject: An attempt to inject lighter subject matter

 Salvete omnes,

 

I am not a civis, though I have posted here in the past and have considered taking citizenship for some time. I fear the fact that I am a monotheist would stand in the way of full acceptance here, even though I do believe that persecution of any religious/faith group, including monotheists persecuting polytheists or pantheists, is counterproductive to all religious/faith groups.

 

For what it’s worth, I would fully support construction of a new temple in Roma and would love to hear more about it. Frankly, I’d like to see true quirites regain control of the site now said to be that of the Lupercale and other deeply significant locations. <sigh>

 

But what I ask here is something far lighter in spirit: suggestions from fellow lovers of -- and greater experts than I in -- all things Roman, about naming a dog.

 

Fear not, it’s not a black dog, but a Magyar vizsla: a Pannonian pointer, if you will. That’s a medium-sized, short-haired, russet-colored hunting dog.

 

I thought of naming him after one of the great leaders; Romulus/Quirinus and Numa Pompilius came to mind at once, but that might be viewed as sacrilegious. Besides, though they are leaders in any house in which they live and probably indeed would disappear quickly from the midst of a group of otherwise attentive people, they’re not especially spiritual and aren’t likely to commune with Egeria any time soon.

 

Then I thought, “Why not one of the great heroes?”  Valerius Poplicola? Horatius? Camillus? Aemilius Paullus? Valerius Corvus? Any of the Cornelii Scipiones? That would take some explaining to passers-by, although it might be interesting.

 

As it has red hair, how about a red-haired Roman? “Sulla” is out. The dog wouldn’t know how to bite anyone, much less have anyone hunted by his Alban estate, and he’s more likely to cost me a tabularium than cause one to be built. And Cato . . . .well, maybe if he barks a lot. Loudly. And “Tiberius,” as in “Claudius Nero,” conqueror of Pannonia, is a bit long, wouldn’t you think?

 

Of course, the magnificent Latin language also comes into play here. I may train the dog to respond to commands in Latin, which worked well with humans a few years ago, when I volunteered to substitute-teach a Latin class at a local high school. The students were everywhere but where they should have been when I arrived, and noisy.

 

“Please take your seats and be quiet.” No response . . . .  “Be seated.” Finally, “TACETE! SEDETE!”

 

As I recall, the response was, “Holy @#$%, we’re going to do actual Latin today!” We talked about fig trees and twin boys and the Poemerium and how a group of immigrants with a disdain for kings, a will to survive, amazing inventiveness, a riverside capital, a brilliant military tradition and a deep faith in the divine can devise a great republic.

 

Apologies for the digression. You get the idea.

 

I’d call the dog “Rufus,” of course, but Minerva only knows how many Rufi are wandering around this part of the world with no notion of the meaning of their names. Or I’d call him “Scriptor” because I am a writer and editor by trade. But that’s me, not him.

 

So, friends, I ask: What would a good Roman name his new dog?

 

Valete,

ld

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com
Version: 8.0.173 / Virus Database: 270.7.5/1698 - Release Date: 9/29/2008 7:25 PM

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 57828 From: Gaius Petronius Dexter Date: 2008-09-30
Subject: Re: An attempt to inject lighter subject matter
Salve Lyn,

> So, friends, I ask: What would a good Roman name his new dog?

The subject of this topic is to built a temple for the gods, not a
temple for the dogs.;o)

Do you know the dog Scylax? A great moloss of C. Pompeius Trimalchio in
the Satiricon of Petronius.

Or the dog Perseus of the Paulus Aemilius' daughter. With the touching
tale of the daughter crying because her dog Perseus was died, and her
father Aemilius Paulus, the future winner of the king Perseus of
Macedon, say to his sister : Your word augurs well for me.

Vale.

C. Petronius Dexter
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 57829 From: Gnaeus Caelius Ahenobarbus Date: 2008-09-30
Subject: Re: An attempt to inject lighter subject matter
Salve Lyn!

    No matter what you name your dog, remember to have a mosaic inlaid on your entryway floor: CAVE CANEM. :-)
 
--
Gnaeus Caelius Ahenobarbus
Aedilis Oppidi, Oppidum Fluminis Gilae, America Austroccidentalis
Accensus, cos. M. Moravius Piscinus Horatianus et T. Iulius Sabinus
http://becomingnewthroughtheold.blogspot.com



Group: Nova-Roma Message: 57830 From: Lyn Dowling Date: 2008-09-30
Subject: Re: An attempt to inject lighter subject matter

LOL. Oh, absolutely.

 

You know, I like Nova Roma more by the moment. Nowhere else on earth could I get away with writing an essay like the one I foisted on you, Quirites, simply because today, I felt like writing about Roma and used the dog as an excuse.

 

Many, many thanks!

ld

 

 


From: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com [mailto:Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Gnaeus Caelius Ahenobarbus
Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2008 6:38 PM
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] An attempt to inject lighter subject matter

 

Salve Lyn!

    No matter what you name your dog, remember to have a mosaic inlaid on your entryway floor: CAVE CANEM. :-)

 

--
Gnaeus Caelius Ahenobarbus
Aedilis Oppidi, Oppidum Fluminis Gilae, America Austroccidentalis
Accensus, cos. M. Moravius Piscinus Horatianus et T. Iulius Sabinus
http://becomingnewt hroughtheold. blogspot. com

 

 

 

No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com
Version: 8.0.173 / Virus Database: 270.7.5/1698 - Release Date: 9/29/2008 7:25 PM

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 57831 From: Lyn Dowling Date: 2008-09-30
Subject: Re: An attempt to inject lighter subject matter

Ah! Perseus! I’d almost forgotten about him, even though Aemilius is one of my great heroes.

 

Many thanks, C, Petronius!

 

ld.

 


From: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com [mailto:Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Gaius Petronius Dexter
Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2008 5:43 PM
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: An attempt to inject lighter subject matter

 

Salve Lyn,

> So, friends, I ask: What would a good Roman name his new dog?

The subject of this topic is to built a temple for the gods, not a
temple for the dogs.;o)

Do you know the dog Scylax? A great moloss of C. Pompeius Trimalchio in
the Satiricon of Petronius.

Or the dog Perseus of the Paulus Aemilius' daughter. With the touching
tale of the daughter crying because her dog Perseus was died, and her
father Aemilius Paulus, the future winner of the king Perseus of
Macedon, say to his sister : Your word augurs well for me.

Vale.

C. Petronius Dexter

No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com
Version: 8.0.173 / Virus Database: 270.7.5/1698 - Release Date: 9/29/2008 7:25 PM

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 57832 From: adriano.rota Date: 2008-09-30
Subject: Toooo much religious Blah Blah
Salvete omnes,

At first I want to state:
It is not my intention to hurt anybodies feelings here!

As you are romans, don't you think you are exagerating these religious
matters a little bit?
Sorry to say that, but this news group gives the impression, that NR is
a bunch of religious fanatics who look for an extravagant way of
warshiping in order to be different out of frustration!!!
What is wrong with you. If our Roman ancestors would see the
discussions here... !!! They would start a civil war imediately because
almost nothing which brings the Repubic on in the future is seriously
discussed here.
In the meantime, "the Roman Empire" displays an artificial Togaparty
Stile way of living with a website that NR has to be ebmarassed!
And the real historically inerested and educated people of NR present
themself like "Jehova's Whitnesses".
Come on Romans, get real!!! What would have happened to Rome if they
had been so far away. NR has to be build up. What is it today. First
one has to build up Rome and then maybe there is enough space to get
spheric.
Don't get me wrong though, I do agree it is important factor to have a
strong religio in the backgound. But I do think NR is flegmatic.
It rather scares potetial new citizens off than anyting else if one
reads the News Group.
And me,... I think it is soooo boring to read all this religious blah
blah every day. Create a new sodalitas for these matters but do not
make people believe NR is a Church !!! Please

valete

C.Aqu.Rota
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 57833 From: luciusjul25@yahoo.com Date: 2008-09-30
Subject: Re: Toooo much religious Blah Blah
Salve,

It is not my intention to hurt any persons feelings here as well so forgive the manner in which this statement may sound. If you do not care for the Religio or any postings about the Religio then do not read any posts about the Religio. Even though you excuse yourself from being harsh their are plenty of citizens who follow the Religio that may very well feel hurt. I, for one, am not one of them, I say live and let live. You are entitled to your own opinion. Maybe you are correct in saying some projects are useless and hopeless without the rebuilding of Ancient Rome but we all know that is impossible in this era. Unless someone has a glorious coup in mind ;-). Since that will not be effective we have to learn to live with the government in place there and in turn work together with them to grant us some access to a plot of land that is unused. True, it is not going to happen tomorrow, next week, or even next year but would you like to live your entire life wondering " what if" instead of actually acting on something you believe in? I, myself, have never thought in such terms and never will because life is too short to wonder on my death bed, "what if" and die with regret. Plenty of people believe in this project and the more that are recruited the closer we could possibly get to reality. The Religio is one of the main aspects of NR so that all like-minded worshippers of the Gods can express their ideas in worshipping those Gods.

May the Eternal Gods keep you!!!

Lucius Iulius Regulus
Regional Coordinator Sodalitas ProDIIS North America


Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile


From: "adriano.rota" <adriano.rota@...>
Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2008 23:19:55 -0000
To: <Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com>
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Toooo much religious Blah Blah

Salvete omnes,

At first I want to state:
It is not my intention to hurt anybodies feelings here!

As you are romans, don't you think you are exagerating these religious
matters a little bit?
Sorry to say that, but this news group gives the impression, that NR is
a bunch of religious fanatics who look for an extravagant way of
warshiping in order to be different out of frustration! !!
What is wrong with you. If our Roman ancestors would see the
discussions here... !!! They would start a civil war imediately because
almost nothing which brings the Repubic on in the future is seriously
discussed here.
In the meantime, "the Roman Empire" displays an artificial Togaparty
Stile way of living with a website that NR has to be ebmarassed!
And the real historically inerested and educated people of NR present
themself like "Jehova's Whitnesses".
Come on Romans, get real!!! What would have happened to Rome if they
had been so far away. NR has to be build up. What is it today. First
one has to build up Rome and then maybe there is enough space to get
spheric.
Don't get me wrong though, I do agree it is important factor to have a
strong religio in the backgound. But I do think NR is flegmatic.
It rather scares potetial new citizens off than anyting else if one
reads the News Group.
And me,... I think it is soooo boring to read all this religious blah
blah every day. Create a new sodalitas for these matters but do not
make people believe NR is a Church !!! Please

valete

C.Aqu.Rota

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 57834 From: adriano.rota Date: 2008-09-30
Subject: Re: Toooo much religious Blah Blah
Salve Lucius Regulus,

It seems typial to only see black and white!!! How Do you know that I
am not a strong bliever???

But these web posts are 90 percent about religion. Is this NR????

If so tell all the citizens about it!!! And have fun watching to see
the comunity shrink.

Roman living is not only Roman Religio my friend !

vale




--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, luciusjul25@... wrote:
>
> Salve,
>
> It is not my intention to hurt any persons feelings here as well so
forgive the manner in which this statement may sound. If you do not
care for the Religio or any postings about the Religio then do not
read any posts about the Religio. Even though you excuse yourself
from being harsh their are plenty of citizens who follow the Religio
that may very well feel hurt. I, for one, am not one of them, I say
live and let live. You are entitled to your own opinion. Maybe you
are correct in saying some projects are useless and hopeless without
the rebuilding of Ancient Rome but we all know that is impossible in
this era. Unless someone has a glorious coup in mind ;-). Since that
will not be effective we have to learn to live with the government in
place there and in turn work together with them to grant us some
access to a plot of land that is unused. True, it is not going to
happen tomorrow, next week, or even next year but would you like to
live your entire life wondering " what if" instead of actually acting
on something you believe in? I, myself, have never thought in such
terms and never will because life is too short to wonder on my death
bed, "what if" and die with regret. Plenty of people believe in this
project and the more that are recruited the closer we could possibly
get to reality. The Religio is one of the main aspects of NR so that
all like-minded worshippers of the Gods can express their ideas in
worshipping those Gods.
>
> May the Eternal Gods keep you!!!
>
> Lucius Iulius Regulus
> Regional Coordinator Sodalitas ProDIIS North America
>
>
>
> Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: "adriano.rota" <adriano.rota@...>
>
> Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2008 23:19:55
> To: <Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com>
> Subject: [Nova-Roma] Toooo much religious Blah Blah
>
>
> Salvete omnes,
>
> At first I want to state:
> It is not my intention to hurt anybodies feelings here!
>
> As you are romans, don't you think you are exagerating these
religious
> matters a little bit?
> Sorry to say that, but this news group gives the impression, that
NR is
> a bunch of religious fanatics who look for an extravagant way of
> warshiping in order to be different out of frustration!!!
> What is wrong with you. If our Roman ancestors would see the
> discussions here... !!! They would start a civil war imediately
because
> almost nothing which brings the Repubic on in the future is
seriously
> discussed here.
> In the meantime, "the Roman Empire" displays an artificial
Togaparty
> Stile way of living with a website that NR has to be ebmarassed!
> And the real historically inerested and educated people of NR
present
> themself like "Jehova's Whitnesses".
> Come on Romans, get real!!! What would have happened to Rome if
they
> had been so far away. NR has to be build up. What is it today.
First
> one has to build up Rome and then maybe there is enough space to
get
> spheric.
> Don't get me wrong though, I do agree it is important factor to
have a
> strong religio in the backgound. But I do think NR is flegmatic.
> It rather scares potetial new citizens off than anyting else if one
> reads the News Group.
> And me,... I think it is soooo boring to read all this religious
blah
> blah every day. Create a new sodalitas for these matters but do not
> make people believe NR is a Church !!! Please
>
> valete
>
> C.Aqu.Rota
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 57835 From: adriano.rota Date: 2008-09-30
Subject: Question about Taxes/Donations
Salvete,

By the way can somebody tell me real quick how I can pay taxes or how I
can send money to NR?

valete
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 57836 From: Lucius Iulius Regulus Date: 2008-09-30
Subject: Re: Toooo much religious Blah Blah
Salve,
 
I never stated you were not a believer of the Religio, simply that the Religio is a big part of NR. If you are a practitioner of the Religio, I'm curious to know why the religious posts bother you so much? Are you not here as well to progress the Religio into the real world or would you rather just keep it in the privacy of your own home? Whichever your preference is completely acceptable, of course, but do not put out the fire of those who are tired of practicing in the privacy of their own homes. They want a dream realized,a physical place to worship the Gods. Roman way of life was not only about the Religio, true, but many things were entwined in it. Saying that the NR community will soon shrink because of the religious posts is sad to see because if anyone was influenced to leave because of subjects discussed here, it was probably best that they weren't here at all. They are more than welcome to discuss all things Roman here if they wish.
 
Lucius Iulius Regulus

 

----- Original Message ----
From: adriano.rota <adriano.rota@...>
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2008 8:23:55 PM
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Toooo much religious Blah Blah

Salve Lucius Regulus,

It seems typial to only see black and white!!! How Do you know that I
am not a strong bliever???

But these web posts are 90 percent about religion. Is this NR????

If so tell all the citizens about it!!! And have fun watching to see
the comunity shrink.

Roman living is not only Roman Religio my friend !

vale


--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com, luciusjul25@ ... wrote:
>
> Salve,
>
> It is not my intention to hurt any persons feelings here as well so
forgive the manner in which this statement may sound. If you do not
care for the Religio or any postings about the Religio then do not
read any posts about the Religio. Even though you excuse yourself
from being harsh their are plenty of citizens who follow the Religio
that may very well feel hurt. I, for one, am not one of them, I say
live and let live. You are entitled to your own opinion. Maybe you
are correct in saying some projects are useless and hopeless without
the rebuilding of Ancient Rome but we all know that is impossible in
this era. Unless someone has a glorious coup in mind ;-). Since that
will not be effective we have to learn to live with the government in
place there and in turn work together with them to grant us some
access to a plot of land that is unused. True, it is not going to
happen tomorrow, next week, or even next year but would you like to
live your entire life wondering " what if" instead of actually acting
on something you believe in? I, myself, have never thought in such
terms and never will because life is too short to wonder on my death
bed, "what if" and die with regret. Plenty of people believe in this
project and the more that are recruited the closer we could possibly
get to reality. The Religio is one of the main aspects of NR so that
all like-minded worshippers of the Gods can express their ideas in
worshipping those Gods.
>
> May the Eternal Gods keep you!!!
>
> Lucius Iulius Regulus
> Regional Coordinator Sodalitas ProDIIS North America
>
>
>
> Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: "adriano.rota" <adriano.rota@ ...>
>
> Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2008 23:19:55
> To: <Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com>
> Subject: [Nova-Roma] Toooo much religious Blah Blah
>
>
> Salvete omnes,
>
> At first I want to state:
> It is not my intention to hurt anybodies feelings here!
>
> As you are romans, don't you think you are exagerating these
religious
> matters a little bit?
> Sorry to say that, but this news group gives the impression, that
NR is
> a bunch of religious fanatics who look for an extravagant way of
> warshiping in order to be different out of frustration! !!
> What is wrong with you. If our Roman ancestors would see the
> discussions here... !!! They would start a civil war imediately
because
> almost nothing which brings the Repubic on in the future is
seriously
> discussed here.
> In the meantime, "the Roman Empire" displays an artificial
Togaparty
> Stile way of living with a website that NR has to be ebmarassed!
> And the real historically inerested and educated people of NR
present
> themself like "Jehova's Whitnesses".
> Come on Romans, get real!!! What would have happened to Rome if
they
> had been so far away. NR has to be build up. What is it today.
First
> one has to build up Rome and then maybe there is enough space to
get
> spheric.
> Don't get me wrong though, I do agree it is important factor to
have a
> strong religio in the backgound. But I do think NR is flegmatic.
> It rather scares potetial new citizens off than anyting else if one
> reads the News Group.
> And me,... I think it is soooo boring to read all this religious
blah
> blah every day. Create a new sodalitas for these matters but do not
> make people believe NR is a Church !!! Please
>
> valete
>
> C.Aqu.Rota
>


Group: Nova-Roma Message: 57837 From: James V Hooper Date: 2008-09-30
Subject: Re: Question about Taxes/Donations
Salve Adriano,
Most citizens in this country use Paypal to donate funds or pay
taxes.
Vale,
Gaius Pompeius Marcellus


On Wed, 01 Oct 2008 00:41:00 -0000
"adriano.rota" <adriano.rota@...> wrote:
> Salvete,
>
> By the way can somebody tell me real quick how I can pay taxes or how I
> can send money to NR?
>
> valete
>

BB,
Warrior
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 57838 From: Gnaeus Caelius Ahenobarbus Date: 2008-09-30
Subject: Re: Toooo much religious Blah Blah
Cn. Caelius Ahenobarbus C. Aquiliae Rotae S.P.D.

    I hope things are well with your amazing project, amice mi! Might I suggest that you start a new thread and tell people what you are building? The more conversation here, the wider-ranging Rome becomes, and those people who visit can see multiple things being done in the name of the res publica.
    And, to be correct, Nova Roma *IS* a church. In the constitution, it says:

"As a nation, Nova Roma shall be the temporal homeland and worldly focus for the Religio Romana. The primary function of Nova Roma shall be to promote the study and practice of pagan Roman civilization, defined as the period from the founding of the City of Rome in 753 BCE to the removal of the altar of Victory from the Senate in 394 CE and encompassing such fields as religion, culture, politics, art, literature, language, and philosophy."

   "As a nation", "primary function", and "encompassing...religion": here are quotes that show that Nova Roma was founded as a state for support of the Religio Romana. Nova Roma is a substrate upon which formal worship can be built. That is Nova Roma's original and main purpose. There are many other amazing and wonderful things that can be done, as well (your project comes to mind, as well as many others), but the support of the Religio is really the "primary function" of Nova Roma. Nova Roma IS a church.

Optime vale, amice!
 
--
Gnaeus Caelius Ahenobarbus
Aedilis Oppidi, Oppidum Fluminis Gilae, America Austroccidentalis
Accensus, cos. M. Moravius Piscinus Horatianus et T. Iulius Sabinus
http://becomingnewthroughtheold.blogspot.com


----- Original Message ----
From: adriano.rota <adriano.rota@...>
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2008 4:19:55 PM
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Toooo much religious Blah Blah

Salvete omnes,

At first I want to state:
It is not my intention to hurt anybodies feelings here!

As you are romans, don't you think you are exagerating these religious
matters a little bit?
Sorry to say that, but this news group gives the impression, that NR is
a bunch of religious fanatics who look for an extravagant way of
warshiping in order to be different out of frustration! !!
What is wrong with you. If our Roman ancestors would see the
discussions here... !!! They would start a civil war imediately because
almost nothing which brings the Repubic on in the future is seriously
discussed here.
In the meantime, "the Roman Empire" displays an artificial Togaparty
Stile way of living with a website that NR has to be ebmarassed!
And the real historically inerested and educated people of NR present
themself like "Jehova's Whitnesses".
Come on Romans, get real!!! What would have happened to Rome if they
had been so far away. NR has to be build up. What is it today. First
one has to build up Rome and then maybe there is enough space to get
spheric.
Don't get me wrong though, I do agree it is important factor to have a
strong religio in the backgound. But I do think NR is flegmatic.
It rather scares potetial new citizens off than anyting else if one
reads the News Group.
And me,... I think it is soooo boring to read all this religious blah
blah every day. Create a new sodalitas for these matters but do not
make people believe NR is a Church !!! Please

valete

C.Aqu.Rota


Group: Nova-Roma Message: 57839 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2008-09-30
Subject: Re: Question about Taxes/Donations
Salve Rota,

I'm answering this both in the mailing list and as a direct e-mail,
since the mailing list sometimes blanks out the names of websites.

To pay taxes, go to your Album Civium page at
http://www.novaroma.org/civitas/album?id=11726

There'll be a "name or e-mail" box there, with a password box below
it. Type in your name or your e-mail address, and then type in the
password you registered when you joined Nova Roma. If you can't
remember it write to the webmaster and ask him to reset it for you.

Once you're logged in, click on "My Account."

On the left side of that page, you'll see a link that says "Make A
Payment." Click on that. It will take you to an interface that
allows you to pay taxes in several ways. One way, and the one most of
us use, is via Paypal. You can only use that if you also have a
Paypal account. If you don't have one, you can set one up at
www.paypal.com. It will take a few days. If you'd rather pay your
taxes in some other way, there are additional choices.

Also, if you don't want to use the Nova Roma website, you can just use
Paypal directly to send funds to consuls@...

Vale,

CN-EQVIT-MARINVS

"adriano.rota" <adriano.rota@...> writes:

> Salvete,
>
> By the way can somebody tell me real quick how I can pay taxes or how I
> can send money to NR?
>
> valete
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 57840 From: Annia Minucia Marcella Date: 2008-09-30
Subject: Re: Toooo much religious Blah Blah
Salve,

News group?
Vale
- Annia Minucia Marcella
Legata Pro Praetore Nova Britannia
http://novabritannia.org
http://myspace.com/novabritannia
http://ciarin.com/governor


adriano.rota wrote:

Salvete omnes,

At first I want to state:
It is not my intention to hurt anybodies feelings here!

As you are romans, don't you think you are exagerating these religious
matters a little bit?
Sorry to say that, but this news group gives the impression, that NR is
a bunch of religious fanatics who look for an extravagant way of
warshiping in order to be different out of frustration! !!
What is wrong with you. If our Roman ancestors would see the
discussions here... !!! They would start a civil war imediately because
almost nothing which brings the Repubic on in the future is seriously
discussed here.
In the meantime, "the Roman Empire" displays an artificial Togaparty
Stile way of living with a website that NR has to be ebmarassed!
And the real historically inerested and educated people of NR present
themself like "Jehova's Whitnesses".
Come on Romans, get real!!! What would have happened to Rome if they
had been so far away. NR has to be build up. What is it today. First
one has to build up Rome and then maybe there is enough space to get
spheric.
Don't get me wrong though, I do agree it is important factor to have a
strong religio in the backgound. But I do think NR is flegmatic.
It rather scares potetial new citizens off than anyting else if one
reads the News Group.
And me,... I think it is soooo boring to read all this religious blah
blah every day. Create a new sodalitas for these matters but do not
make people believe NR is a Church !!! Please

valete

C.Aqu.Rota

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 57841 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2008-09-30
Subject: Re: Toooo much religious Blah Blah
Salve Marcella,

Annia Minucia Marcella <annia@...> writes:

> Salve,
>
> News group?

Perhaps our friend Rota thinks we're a USENET news group, like
alt.religion.kibology. If he reads the mailing list using the Yahoo
web page, it would look a lot like a USENET news group as seen using a
browser and news.google.com.

Vale,

CN-EQVIT-MARINVS
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 57842 From: PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@aol.com Date: 2008-09-30
Subject: Re: Toooo much religious Blah Blah
Ercule.  Did this lout just fall off the last cart of turnips?  Doesn't he realize that Nova Roma was founded for, among other things, the restoration of the Religio Romana?  This is the sort of ignorance that grinds my grist.  Rota, read the Declaration and the Constitution.
 
Aurelianus
 
In a message dated 9/30/2008 6:21:16 P.M. Central Daylight Time, adriano.rota@... writes:

Salvete omnes,

At first I want to state:
It is not my intention to hurt anybodies feelings here!

As you are romans, don't you think you are exagerating these religious
matters a little bit?
Sorry to say that, but this news group gives the impression, that NR is
a bunch of religious fanatics who look for an extravagant way of
warshiping in order to be different out of frustration! !!
What is wrong with you. If our Roman ancestors would see the
discussions here... !!! They would start a civil war imediately because
almost nothing which brings the Repubic on in the future is seriously
discussed here.
In the meantime, "the Roman Empire" displays an artificial Togaparty
Stile way of living with a website that NR has to be ebmarassed!
And the real historically inerested and educated people of NR present
themself like "Jehova's Whitnesses".
Come on Romans, get real!!! What would have happened to Rome if they
had been so far away. NR has to be build up. What is it today. First
one has to build up Rome and then maybe there is enough space to get
spheric.
Don't get me wrong though, I do agree it is important factor to have a
strong religio in the backgound. But I do think NR is flegmatic.
It rather scares potetial new citizens off than anyting else if one
reads the News Group.
And me,... I think it is soooo boring to read all this religious blah
blah every day. Create a new sodalitas for these matters but do not
make people believe NR is a Church !!! Please

valete

C.Aqu.Rota





Looking for simple solutions to your real-life financial challenges? Check out WalletPop for the latest news and information, tips and calculators.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 57843 From: PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@aol.com Date: 2008-09-30
Subject: Re: Question about Taxes/Donations
Try reading more than a few messages and you could probably find out yourself.  Try going to the main website for Nova Roma.  In one message, you have likely pissed off a whole bunch of cultores deorum but I can definitely assure you that you have made a tragically bad impression on me.
 
Aurelianus
 
 
 
In a message dated 9/30/2008 7:41:31 P.M. Central Daylight Time, adriano.rota@... writes:

Salvete,

By the way can somebody tell me real quick how I can pay taxes or how I
can send money to NR?

valete





Looking for simple solutions to your real-life financial challenges? Check out WalletPop for the latest news and information, tips and calculators.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 57844 From: adriano.rota Date: 2008-09-30
Subject: Re: Toooo much religious Blah Blah
Salve Patruig,

You amuse me. After more than 2000 years you obviously did not
realize yet what culture means!
I have to laugh. You are funny.! Really. Excuse me please.
But your interpretation of cultural matters fitts better in a non
secularised medieval thinking found in the middle east rather than in
a roman mind!
I guess Nova Rome needs exactly that!
I advise you not to sate such comments too often, your state
interpretation is as oldfashioned as Islam itself.

You are funny man
But let us not talk about the subject anymore as it seems too much
for the openmindedness and Kritikfaehigkeit of some citzien and as I
said: There is too much talk of that kind anyway.

Have fun Maestro

C.Aqu. Dr. Pol. Wiss.



--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@... wrote:
>
> Ercule. Did this lout just fall off the last cart of turnips?
Doesn't he
> realize that Nova Roma was founded for, among other things, the
restoration of
> the Religio Romana? This is the sort of ignorance that grinds my
grist.
> Rota, read the Declaration and the Constitution.
>
> Aurelianus
>
>
> In a message dated 9/30/2008 6:21:16 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
> adriano.rota@... writes:
>
>
>
>
> Salvete omnes,
>
> At first I want to state:
> It is not my intention to hurt anybodies feelings here!
>
> As you are romans, don't you think you are exagerating these
religious
> matters a little bit?
> Sorry to say that, but this news group gives the impression, that
NR is
> a bunch of religious fanatics who look for an extravagant way of
> warshiping in order to be different out of frustration!wa
> What is wrong with you. If our Roman ancestors would see the
> discussions here... !!! They would start a civil war imediately
because
> almost nothing which brings the Repubic on in the future is
seriously
> discussed here.
> In the meantime, "the Roman Empire" displays an artificial
Togaparty
> Stile way of living with a website that NR has to be ebmarassed!
> And the real historically inerested and educated people of NR
present
> themself like "Jehova's Whitnesses".
> Come on Romans, get real!!! What would have happened to Rome if
they
> had been so far away. NR has to be build up. What is it today.
First
> one has to build up Rome and then maybe there is enough space to
get
> spheric.
> Don't get me wrong though, I do agree it is important factor to
have a
> strong religio in the backgound. But I do think NR is flegmatic.
> It rather scares potetial new citizens off than anyting else if
one
> reads the News Group.
> And me,... I think it is soooo boring to read all this religious
blah
> blah every day. Create a new sodalitas for these matters but do
not
> make people believe NR is a Church !!! Please
>
> valete
>
> C.Aqu.Rota
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> **************Looking for simple solutions to your real-life
financial
> challenges? Check out WalletPop for the latest news and
information, tips and
> calculators. (http://www.walletpop.com/?
NCID=emlcntuswall00000001)
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 57845 From: adriano.rota Date: 2008-09-30
Subject: Re: Question about Taxes/Donations
Salve,

and as a proud Roman and an Acadmic of a European Elite University,
my friend, I give a .... if you think I made a bad Impression.

What a Roman are You ? Of the feudal Tyrant sort?

optime vale amice

C.Auq. Rota


--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@... wrote:
>
> Try reading more than a few messages and you could probably find
out
> yourself. Try going to the main website for Nova Roma. In one
message, you have
> likely pissed off a whole bunch of cultores deorum but I can
definitely assure
> you that you have made a tragically bad impression on me.
>
> Aurelianus
>
>
>
>
> In a message dated 9/30/2008 7:41:31 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
> adriano.rota@... writes:
>
>
>
>
> Salvete,
>
> By the way can somebody tell me real quick how I can pay taxes or
how I
> can send money to NR?
>
> valete
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> **************Looking for simple solutions to your real-life
financial
> challenges? Check out WalletPop for the latest news and
information, tips and
> calculators. (http://www.walletpop.com/?
NCID=emlcntuswall00000001)
>