Selected messages in Nova-Roma group. Dec 11-21, 2008.

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 59886 From: Titus Flavius Aquila Date: 2008-12-11
Subject: Re: ELECTION RESULTS
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 59887 From: fauxrari Date: 2008-12-11
Subject: Re: Semper ubi, sub ubi! Or the great women's undergarments p...
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 59888 From: marcushoratius Date: 2008-12-11
Subject: a. d. III Eidus Decembris: AGONIUM INDIGETI
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 59889 From: Lucia Livia Plauta Date: 2008-12-11
Subject: Re: Semper ubi, sub ubi! Or the great women's undergarments p...
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 59890 From: Lucia Livia Plauta Date: 2008-12-11
Subject: Rome under water
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 59891 From: Publius Memmius Albucius Date: 2008-12-11
Subject: Re: Congratulations and Thanks
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 59892 From: James V Hooper Date: 2008-12-11
Subject: Re: Rome under water
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 59893 From: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com Date: 2008-12-11
Subject: Online Resources for Classics Study and Research, 12/12/2008, 12:00
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 59894 From: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com Date: 2008-12-11
Subject: Nova Roma has Amazon shops!, 12/12/2008, 12:00 am
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 59895 From: hikerbill40 Date: 2008-12-11
Subject: Re: Rome under water
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 59896 From: QFabiusMaxmi@aol.com Date: 2008-12-11
Subject: Re: Semper ubi, sub ubi! Or the great women's undergarments p...
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 59897 From: Gaius Petronius Dexter Date: 2008-12-12
Subject: Re: Rome under water
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 59898 From: fauxrari Date: 2008-12-12
Subject: Re: Semper ubi, sub ubi! Or the great women's undergarments p...
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 59899 From: marcushoratius Date: 2008-12-12
Subject: Pridie Eidus Decembris: feriae Conso in Aventino
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 59900 From: Gaius Petronius Dexter Date: 2008-12-12
Subject: Today in Rome: Dec 12, 2008.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 59901 From: Lucia Livia Plauta Date: 2008-12-12
Subject: Re: Semper ubi, sub ubi! Or the great women's undergarments p...
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 59902 From: sixthcenturykatafractos Date: 2008-12-12
Subject: Re: Semper ubi, sub ubi! Or the great women's undergarments p...
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 59903 From: Lucia Livia Plauta Date: 2008-12-12
Subject: Re: Semper ubi, sub ubi! Or the great women's undergarments p...
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 59904 From: Lucia Livia Plauta Date: 2008-12-12
Subject: Re: Rome under water
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 59905 From: L Julia Aquila Date: 2008-12-12
Subject: Re: Rome under water
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 59906 From: Maxima Valeria Messallina Date: 2008-12-12
Subject: Re: What are we?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 59907 From: QFabiusMaxmi@aol.com Date: 2008-12-13
Subject: Re: Semper ubi, sub ubi! Or the great women's undergarments p...
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 59908 From: QFabiusMaxmi@aol.com Date: 2008-12-13
Subject: Re: Semper ubi, sub ubi! Or the great women's undergarments p...
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 59909 From: Gaius Petronius Dexter Date: 2008-12-13
Subject: Today in Rome: Dec 13, 2008.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 59910 From: marcushoratius Date: 2008-12-13
Subject: EIDUS DECEMBRIS: Telleri Lecisternium Cereri
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 59911 From: Cn. Cornelius Lentulus Date: 2008-12-13
Subject: LAST REGULAR RITUAL: 10th Anniversary of Nova Roma - Sacred Year of
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 59912 From: Cn. Cornelius Lentulus Date: 2008-12-13
Subject: Sending your public prayers to Concordia
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 59913 From: Robert Levee Date: 2008-12-13
Subject: Re: What are we?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 59914 From: Robert Levee Date: 2008-12-13
Subject: Re: What are we?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 59915 From: Gnaeus Caelius Ahenobarbus Date: 2008-12-13
Subject: Re: What are we?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 59916 From: Robert Levee Date: 2008-12-13
Subject: Re: What are we?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 59917 From: Gnaeus Caelius Ahenobarbus Date: 2008-12-13
Subject: Re: What are we?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 59918 From: Robert Levee Date: 2008-12-13
Subject: Re: What are we?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 59919 From: Stefn Ullerius Venator Piperbarbus Date: 2008-12-13
Subject: Challenge
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 59920 From: Steve Moore Date: 2008-12-13
Subject: Re: What are we?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 59921 From: Gnaeus Caelius Ahenobarbus Date: 2008-12-13
Subject: Re: Challenge
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 59922 From: Robert Levee Date: 2008-12-13
Subject: Re: Challenge
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 59923 From: Gaius Petronius Dexter Date: 2008-12-14
Subject: Today in Rome: Dec 14, 2008.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 59924 From: Q. Caecilius Metellus Date: 2008-12-14
Subject: (no subject)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 59925 From: Q. Caecilius Metellus Date: 2008-12-14
Subject: Acta Pontificum, Id. Oct. MMDCCLXI
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 59926 From: Q. Caecilius Metellus Date: 2008-12-14
Subject: A Legal Commentary on the Status of Uisa
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 59927 From: Q. Valerius Poplicola Date: 2008-12-14
Subject: Re: Challenge
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 59928 From: Q. Valerius Poplicola Date: 2008-12-14
Subject: Re: What are we?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 59929 From: marcushoratius Date: 2008-12-14
Subject: a. d. XIX Kalendas Ianuaris: The Nine Muses
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 59930 From: philippe cardon Date: 2008-12-14
Subject: Re: Challenge
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 59931 From: Maxima Valeria Messallina Date: 2008-12-14
Subject: Re: What are we?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 59932 From: Lucia Livia Plauta Date: 2008-12-14
Subject: Re: Challenge
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 59933 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2008-12-14
Subject: Re: The land in Texas
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 59934 From: Maxima Valeria Messallina Date: 2008-12-14
Subject: Re: The land in Texas
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 59935 From: Steve Moore Date: 2008-12-14
Subject: Re: What are we?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 59936 From: Stefn Ullerius Venator Piperbarbus Date: 2008-12-14
Subject: Venator's recent posts...
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 59937 From: Publius Memmius Albucius Date: 2008-12-14
Subject: Re: Last Ludi 2761 : IANUALES
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 59938 From: Publius Memmius Albucius Date: 2008-12-14
Subject: A reminder on oathes of office
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 59939 From: Titus Flavius Aquila Date: 2008-12-14
Subject: AW: [Nova-Roma] Challenge / Land fund
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 59940 From: Gnaeus Caelius Ahenobarbus Date: 2008-12-14
Subject: The Coloniae-Romanae List
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 59941 From: philippe cardon Date: 2008-12-14
Subject: Re: Challenge
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 59942 From: philippe cardon Date: 2008-12-14
Subject: Re: Challenge
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 59943 From: Lucia Livia Plauta Date: 2008-12-14
Subject: Re: Challenge
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 59944 From: Gnaeus Caelius Ahenobarbus Date: 2008-12-14
Subject: The Coloniae Romanae List (attempt 2)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 59945 From: Publius Memmius Albucius Date: 2008-12-14
Subject: Re: Challenge + come back
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 59946 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2008-12-14
Subject: Re: AW: [Nova-Roma] Challenge / Land fund
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 59947 From: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com Date: 2008-12-14
Subject: Nova Roma has Amazon shops!, 12/15/2008, 12:00 am
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 59948 From: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com Date: 2008-12-14
Subject: File - EDICTUM DE SERMONE
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 59949 From: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com Date: 2008-12-14
Subject: File - language.txt
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 59950 From: Maior Date: 2008-12-14
Subject: Saturnalia December 17th & the deleted Calendar
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 59951 From: Gaius Petronius Dexter Date: 2008-12-15
Subject: Today in Rome: Dec 15, 2008.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 59952 From: Gaius Petronius Dexter Date: 2008-12-15
Subject: Precatio Flaminis Portunalis pro decennio exacto et altero decennio
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 59953 From: Titus Flavius Aquila Date: 2008-12-15
Subject: AW: AW: [Nova-Roma] Challenge / Land fund
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 59954 From: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com Date: 2008-12-15
Subject: To all in the Far East, 12/15/2008, 12:00 pm
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 59955 From: marcushoratius Date: 2008-12-15
Subject: a. d. XIIX Kalendas Ianuaris: ara Fortunae Reduci
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 59956 From: Lucius Cornelius Cicero Date: 2008-12-15
Subject: Salvete!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 59957 From: James V Hooper Date: 2008-12-15
Subject: Re: Salvete!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 59958 From: Maior Date: 2008-12-15
Subject: Re: What are we?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 59959 From: Gnaeus Iulius Caesar Date: 2008-12-16
Subject: Formation of Oppidum Laureatum, Provincia Canada Ulterior - Edict 23
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 59960 From: Gaius Petronius Dexter Date: 2008-12-16
Subject: Today in Rome: Dec 16, 2008.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 59961 From: Gnaeus Iulius Caesar Date: 2008-12-16
Subject: Formation of Oppidum Laureatum, Provincia Canada Ulterior - Edict 23
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 59962 From: fauxrari Date: 2008-12-16
Subject: Gladiator school featured in History Channel's "Cities of the Underg
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 59963 From: marcushoratius Date: 2008-12-16
Subject: a. d. XVII Kalendas Ianuaris: Saturnalia Eve
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 59964 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2008-12-16
Subject: Fwd: [moderatorcentral] Join Bug affecting Yahoo! Broadband Partner
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 59965 From: M. OCTAVIVS CORVVS Date: 2008-12-16
Subject: Re: AW: AW: [Nova-Roma] Challenge / Land fund
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 59966 From: iulius sabinus Date: 2008-12-16
Subject: Re: Formation of Oppidum Laureatum, Provincia Canada Ulterior - Edic
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 59967 From: Steve Moore Date: 2008-12-16
Subject: Re: Formation of Oppidum Laureatum, Provincia Canada Ulterior - Edic
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 59968 From: Publius Memmius Albucius Date: 2008-12-16
Subject: Ludi ianuales results
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 59969 From: Complutensis Date: 2008-12-16
Subject: Re: Formation of Oppidum Laureatum, Provincia Canada Ulterior - Edic
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 59970 From: M•IVL•SEVERVS Date: 2008-12-16
Subject: Re: AW: AW: [Nova-Roma] Challenge / Land fund
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 59971 From: Christer Edling Date: 2008-12-16
Subject: Re: Formation of Oppidum Laureatum, Provincia Canada Ulterior - Edic
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 59972 From: Gens Iulia Date: 2008-12-16
Subject: Re: AW: AW: [Nova-Roma] Challenge / Land fund
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 59973 From: Gens Iulia Date: 2008-12-16
Subject: Fw: AW: AW: [Nova-Roma] Challenge / Land fund
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 59974 From: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com Date: 2008-12-16
Subject: SATVRNALIA, 12/17/2008, 12:00 am
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 59975 From: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com Date: 2008-12-16
Subject: ante diem XVI Kalendas Ianuarias - Saturnalia, 12/17/2008, 12:00 am
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 59976 From: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com Date: 2008-12-16
Subject: Nova Roma has Amazon shops!, 12/17/2008, 12:00 am
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 59977 From: Chantal Gaudiano Date: 2008-12-16
Subject: File - EDICTUM DE SERMONE
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 59978 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2008-12-16
Subject: Re: File - EDICTUM DE SERMONE
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 59979 From: Titus Flavius Aquila Date: 2008-12-17
Subject: Join the sodalitas proDIIS A Temple for the Gods in Rome today !
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 59980 From: M. OCTAVIVS CORVVS Date: 2008-12-17
Subject: Re: Fw: AW: AW: [Nova-Roma] Challenge / Land fund
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 59981 From: marcushoratius Date: 2008-12-17
Subject: a. d. XVI Kalendas Ianuaris: SATURNALIA
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 59982 From: Gnaeus Iulius Caesar Date: 2008-12-17
Subject: Formation of Oppidum Laureatum, Provincia Canada Ulterior - Edict 23
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 59983 From: Gaius Petronius Dexter Date: 2008-12-17
Subject: Today in Rome: Dec 17, 2008.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 59984 From: philippe cardon Date: 2008-12-17
Subject: Re: Fw: AW: AW: [Nova-Roma] Challenge / Land fund
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 59985 From: Robert Levee Date: 2008-12-17
Subject: Re: Join the sodalitas proDIIS A Temple for the Gods in Rome today !
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 59986 From: Colin Cunningham Date: 2008-12-17
Subject: Re: Join the sodalitas proDIIS A Temple for the Gods in Rome today !
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 59987 From: Robert Levee Date: 2008-12-17
Subject: Re: Join the sodalitas proDIIS A Temple for the Gods in Rome today !
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 59988 From: L Julia Aquila Date: 2008-12-17
Subject: Re: Saturnalia December 17th
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 59989 From: L Julia Aquila Date: 2008-12-17
Subject: Io Saturnalia!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 59990 From: Titus Flavius Aquila Date: 2008-12-17
Subject: AW: [Nova-Roma] Join the sodalitas proDIIS A Temple for the Gods in
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 59991 From: Lucia Livia Plauta Date: 2008-12-17
Subject: Re: Saturnalia December 17th
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 59992 From: Cn. Cornelius Lentulus Date: 2008-12-17
Subject: Celebrating Saturnalia
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 59993 From: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com Date: 2008-12-17
Subject: a.d. XV Kal. Ian., 12/18/2008, 12:00 am
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 59994 From: Cn. Cornelius Lentulus Date: 2008-12-17
Subject: Your Saturnalia Rites
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 59995 From: Titus Iulius Sabinus Date: 2008-12-17
Subject: Re: Your Saturnalia Rites
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 59996 From: fauxrari Date: 2008-12-17
Subject: Re: Your Saturnalia Rites
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 59997 From: M•IVL•SEVERVS Date: 2008-12-17
Subject: ROMANS IN GERMANIA...
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 59998 From: Titus Flavius Aquila Date: 2008-12-18
Subject: AW: [Nova-Roma] ROMANS IN GERMANIA...
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 59999 From: Titus Flavius Aquila Date: 2008-12-18
Subject: Io Triumphe! Io Saturnalia!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60000 From: Gaius Petronius Dexter Date: 2008-12-18
Subject: Today in Rome: Dec 18, 2008.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60001 From: MCC Date: 2008-12-18
Subject: Edictum Praetorium Curiatio-Iulio de Iurisdictione Praetoris
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60002 From: Cn. Cornelius Lentulus Date: 2008-12-18
Subject: Full Translation of Your Saturnalia Rites
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60003 From: Lyn Dowling Date: 2008-12-18
Subject: Re: Full Translation of Your Saturnalia Rites
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60004 From: Rhonda Mills Date: 2008-12-18
Subject: New Roman
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60005 From: marcushoratius Date: 2008-12-18
Subject: a. d. XV Kalendas Ianuarias: Saturnalia; Epona
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60006 From: Cn. Cornelius Lentulus Date: 2008-12-18
Subject: R: [Nova-Roma] New Roman
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60007 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2008-12-18
Subject: Re: New Roman
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60008 From: Publius Memmius Albucius Date: 2008-12-18
Subject: Io Saturnalia !
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60009 From: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com Date: 2008-12-18
Subject: Nova Roma has Amazon shops!, 12/19/2008, 12:00 am
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60010 From: M. Lucretius Agricola Date: 2008-12-18
Subject: Tribunes
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60011 From: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com Date: 2008-12-18
Subject: Citizens, keep your e-mail information up to date!, 12/19/2008, 12:0
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60012 From: Gaius Petronius Dexter Date: 2008-12-18
Subject: Today in Rome: Dec 19, 2008.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60013 From: marcushoratius Date: 2008-12-19
Subject: a. d. XIIII Kalendas Ianuarias: OPALIA
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60014 From: marcushoratius Date: 2008-12-19
Subject: Battle on the Trebbia
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60015 From: RANDALL HERRERA RIOS Date: 2008-12-19
Subject: ROMANS IN GERMANIA...
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60016 From: Patrick D. Owen Date: 2008-12-19
Subject: Edictum Praetorium Curiatio-Iulio de Iurisdictione Praetoris - Resp
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60017 From: M•IVL•SEVERVS Date: 2008-12-19
Subject: IO SATVRNALIA!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60018 From: Publius Memmius Albucius Date: 2008-12-19
Subject: Re: Battle on the Trebbia
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60019 From: Complutensis Date: 2008-12-19
Subject: Re: Edictum Praetorium Curiatio-Iulio de Iurisdictione Praetoris -
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60020 From: Robert Levee Date: 2008-12-19
Subject: Re: Edictum Praetorium Curiatio-Iulio de Iurisdictione Praetoris -
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60021 From: M•IVL•SEVERVS Date: 2008-12-19
Subject: Re: Edictum Praetorium Curiatio-Iulio de Iurisdictione Praetoris -
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60022 From: Lucia Livia Plauta Date: 2008-12-19
Subject: Re: Edictum Praetorium Curiatio-Iulio de Iurisdictione Praetoris -
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60023 From: Gnaeus Iulius Caesar Date: 2008-12-19
Subject: Re: Edictum Praetorium Curiatio-Iulio de Iurisdictione Praetoris -
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60024 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2008-12-19
Subject: Fwd: [moderatorcentral] Severed Cables Causing Email Delays
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60025 From: M. Lucretius Agricola Date: 2008-12-20
Subject: Re: Tribunes
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60026 From: Marcvs Octavivs Corvvs Date: 2008-12-20
Subject: Revival of gladiatorial tuornaments in Rome
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60027 From: Robert Levee Date: 2008-12-20
Subject: Re: Edictum Praetorium Curiatio-Iulio de Iurisdictione Praetoris -
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60028 From: Gnaeus Iulius Caesar Date: 2008-12-20
Subject: Re: Edictum Praetorium Curiatio-Iulio de Iurisdictione Praetoris -
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60029 From: Gaius Petronius Dexter Date: 2008-12-20
Subject: Today in Rome: Dec 20, 2008.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60030 From: marcushoratius Date: 2008-12-20
Subject: a. d. XIII Kalendas Ianuarias: Vitellius and Vespasian
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60031 From: Gnaeus Iulius Caesar Date: 2008-12-20
Subject: Re: Edictum Praetorium Curiatio-Iulio de Iurisdictione Praetoris -
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60032 From: Cn. Cornelius Lentulus Date: 2008-12-20
Subject: R: [Nova-Roma] Re: Edictum Praetorium Curiatio-Iulio de Iurisdiction
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60033 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2008-12-20
Subject: E-mail delays for Gn. Iulius Caesar
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60034 From: iulius sabinus Date: 2008-12-20
Subject: Re: E-mail delays for Gn. Iulius Caesar
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60035 From: Titus Flavius Aquila Date: 2008-12-20
Subject: AW: R: [Nova-Roma] Re: Edictum Praetorium Curiatio-Iulio de Iurisdic
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60036 From: Titus Flavius Aquila Date: 2008-12-20
Subject: WG: AW: R: [Nova-Roma] Re: Edictum Praetorium Curiatio-Iulio de Iuri
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60037 From: Titus Iulius Sabinus Date: 2008-12-20
Subject: WG: AW: R: [Nova-Roma] Re: For Aquila + more about messages delay.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60038 From: Titus Flavius Aquila Date: 2008-12-20
Subject: AW: WG: AW: R: [Nova-Roma] Re: For Aquila + more about messages dela
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60039 From: Lucia Livia Plauta Date: 2008-12-20
Subject: Re: Revival of gladiatorial tuornaments in Rome
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60040 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2008-12-20
Subject: Re: For Aquila + more about messages delay.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60041 From: Nabarz Date: 2008-12-20
Subject: Merry Solstice
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60042 From: Complutensis Date: 2008-12-20
Subject: Re: Fwd: [moderatorcentral] Severed Cables Causing Email Delays
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60043 From: Gnaeus Caelius Ahenobarbus Date: 2008-12-20
Subject: Re: Fwd: [moderatorcentral] Severed Cables Causing Email Delays
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60044 From: Complutensis Date: 2008-12-20
Subject: Re: Edictum Praetorium Curiatio-Iulio de Iurisdictione Praetoris -
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60045 From: iohannkn Date: 2008-12-20
Subject: Re: Merry Solstice
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60046 From: L Julia Aquila Date: 2008-12-20
Subject: Re: The Coloniae Romanae List (attempt 2)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60047 From: Libero Date: 2008-12-20
Subject: R: [Nova-Roma] Re: Revival of gladiatorial tuornaments in Rome
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60048 From: James V Hooper Date: 2008-12-20
Subject: Re: Merry Solstice
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60049 From: Lucia Livia Plauta Date: 2008-12-20
Subject: R: [Nova-Roma] Re: Revival of gladiatorial tuornaments in Rome
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60050 From: Gnaeus Iulius Caesar Date: 2008-12-20
Subject: R: [Nova-Roma] Re: Edictum Praetorium Curiatio-Iulio de Iurisdiction
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60051 From: Cn. Cornelius Lentulus Date: 2008-12-20
Subject: R: [Nova-Roma] Re: Edictum Praetorium Curiatio-Iulio de Iurisdiction
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60052 From: Gnaeus Iulius Caesar Date: 2008-12-20
Subject: Re: R: [Nova-Roma] Re: Edictum Praetorium Curiatio-Iulio de Iurisdic
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60053 From: Q. Valerius Poplicola Date: 2008-12-20
Subject: R: [Nova-Roma] Re: Revival of gladiatorial tuornaments in Rome
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60054 From: Stefn Ullerius Venator Piperbarbus Date: 2008-12-21
Subject: Carts and Horses...
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60055 From: Robert Levee Date: 2008-12-21
Subject: Re: R: [Nova-Roma] Re: Revival of gladiatorial tuornaments in Rome
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60056 From: Q. Valerius Poplicola Date: 2008-12-21
Subject: R: [Nova-Roma] Re: Revival of gladiatorial tuornaments in Rome
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60057 From: Robert Levee Date: 2008-12-21
Subject: Re: R: [Nova-Roma] Re: Revival of gladiatorial tuornaments in Rome
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60058 From: Q. Valerius Poplicola Date: 2008-12-21
Subject: R: [Nova-Roma] Re: Revival of gladiatorial tuornaments in Rome
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60059 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2008-12-21
Subject: Analemma over the Karyatidai
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60060 From: Gaius Petronius Dexter Date: 2008-12-21
Subject: Today in Rome: Dec 21, 2008.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60061 From: marcushoratius Date: 2008-12-21
Subject: a. d. XII Kalendas Ianuarias: Divalia Angeronae



Group: Nova-Roma Message: 59886 From: Titus Flavius Aquila Date: 2008-12-11
Subject: Re: ELECTION RESULTS

 

Salvete Quirites,

 

I would like to thank all of you who have voted for me as Quaestor, be assured that I will serve the Republic well.

 

I would like to congratulate all elected Magistrates and state my deepest gratitude for the leaving Magistrates.

 

The next year will be a difficult year for Nova Roma and its citizens,especially due to the economic world-wide crisis , but with the

new Magistrate taking over, we have the assurance that Nova Roma will circumnavigate these cliffs.

 

May the eternal Gods protect each citizen from the negative effects of this upcoming recession. 

 

The new Quaestores will have the task to provide the consules, praetores, and aediles with their know how , to serve as financial administrators and as aides.

 

May the state treasury never be empty.  Pecuniae imperae oportet, non servire.

 

Pro Res Publica et pro Patria !

 

Optime valete

Titus Flavius Aquila

Quaestor electus

 

 


Group: Nova-Roma Message: 59887 From: fauxrari Date: 2008-12-11
Subject: Re: Semper ubi, sub ubi! Or the great women's undergarments p...
Thank you very much Maximus! That answered many of my questions and
makes the experiment easier on my hands. I hate the libraries near my
house. Their books are not helpful at all. Being an alumna, I was
thinking of going back to UCLA and seeing if I could find some
information in one or more of their 13 libraries. Perhaps there's
even a professor that could help? I will see.

L. Iunia Bruta

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, QFabiusMaxmi@... wrote:
>
>
> In a message dated 12/10/2008 1:22:55 P.M. Pacific Standard Time,
> cases@... writes:
>
> Don't worry about knitting: it didn't exist in roman times, and
> neither did nalbinding, or at least one of the instruments to do
it
> would have been found. What existed is another technique that's
done
> by hand only, and of which I don't remember the name. Once I found
> the website of a woman who does that, but it's very time
consuming. I
> found it by perusing the Roman Army Talk forum, http://
> www.romanarmy.www.romanarmy.<WBR>com/. This ofrum has at least s
> posting and might prove useful.
>
>
>
>
> Romans did not knit. There was a linen band that went under the
breasts to
> support them, but the usual under garment was a linen loin cloth
> (subligariorum), though Cicero advises against men wearing them
while wearing a toga.
>
> Since women are wearing stolas or tunicas they don't have the same
problem
> as the men.
>
> The famous leather garments (the fascia pectoralis & subligar) on
the Ten
> Girls room in the Piazza Armerina Villa in Sicily are not typical
of Roman
> under garments. The owner or his wife was a Christian, and the
mosaic was dated
> to 4th century CE. The cover up may be because of a Christian
edict.
>
> One of Cassiodorus (490-573) comments quoted in Procopius is how
the Roman
> woman are no longer allowed to bathe naked thanks to some edict
from a Bishop.
> There is no date or edict ever found.
>
> Both Cicero, and Varro tells us that the women bathed naked during
the
> Republic. Women in fact often had their separate baths.
>
> Q. Fabius Maximus
>
> **************Make your life easier with all your friends, email,
and
> favorite sites in one place. Try it now.
> (http://www.aol.com/?optin=new-
dp&icid=aolcom40vanity&ncid=emlcntaolcom00000010)
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 59888 From: marcushoratius Date: 2008-12-11
Subject: a. d. III Eidus Decembris: AGONIUM INDIGETI
M. Moravius Piscinus Horatianus Quiritibus et omnibus salutem
plurimam dicit: Di vos servent cum vester.

Hodie est ante diem III Eidus Decembris; haec dies Septimontium
nefastus principio est: AGONALIA INDIGETI


AGONIUM

Janus must be propitiated on the Agonal day.
The day may take its name from the girded priest
At whose blow the God's sacrifice is felled:
Always, before he stains the naked blade with hot blood,
He asks if he should, "agatne?" and won't unless commanded.
Some believe that the day is called Agonal because
The sheep do not come to the altar but are driven (agantur).
Others think the ancients called this festival Agnalia,
`Of the lambs', dropping a letter from its usual place.
Or because the victim fears the knife mirrored in the water,
The day might be so called from the creature's agony?
It may also be that the day has a Greek name
From the games (agones) that were held in former times.
And in ancient speech agonia meant a sheep,
And this last reason in my judgement is the truth.
Though the meaning is uncertain, Rex Sacrorum,
Must appease the Gods with the mate of a woolly ewe.
~ Ovidius Naso, Fasti 1.318 ff.

While Ovid in his typical fashion offers us a few different
explanations, one that he does not mention is that the name Agonium
refers to a more ancient Latin term for sacrificial victim, rather
than "hostis." It may even be related, as Ovid indicates, to the
sacrificial ram. This sacrifice of a ram to Janus occurred at the
Regia (Varro, L. L. 6.12). Agonius is instead mentioned, but only by
Augustustine (Civ. Dei 4.11.16). His name is related to the
Quirinal, in as much as its traditional name was Collis Agonus, the
Colline Gate was called the "porta agonensis," and the Salii
Agonenses were another sodalitas of Salii priest, headquartered on
the Quirinal Hill. It may be that two sacrifices are indicated. The
one for Janus in the Regia by the Rex Sacrorum, while another
sacerdos, possibly the flamen Quirinalis (?) performs a sacrifice of
a more ancient kind to the deity of the Colline city.


SEPTIMONTIA

This festival only appears in later calendars. "The dies
Septimontium is named for the Seven Hills on which site is the City;
the festival is not pro populi, but instead pro montarrum, just as
the Paganalia is for pagans of the rural districts (Varro, L. L.
6.24)." The montes here are the three divisons of the Palatine hill,
being Palatium, Cermalus and Velia, the three divisions of the
Esquiline Hill, being the Fagutal, Mons Oppius, and Mons Cispius,
together with the low-lying Subura between the hills. The flamen
Palatualis performed the sacrifice on the Palatium, but to which
deity is uncertain. Pales or Palatua has been suggested.

Plutarch, Roman Questions 69:

"Why on the festival called Septimontium were they careful to refrain
from the use of horse-drawn vehicles; and why even to this day are
those who do not contemn ancient customs still careful about this?
The festival Septimontium they observe in commemoration of the
addition to the city of the seventh hill, by which Rome was made a
city of seven hills. Is it, as some of the Roman writers conceive,
because the city had not yet been completely joined together in all
its parts? Or has this 'nothing to do with Dionysus?' But did they
imagine, when their great task of consolidation had been
accomplished, that the city had now ceased from further extension;
and they rested themselves, and gave respite to the pack-animals,
which had helped them in their labors, and afforded the animals an
opportunity to enjoy the general festival with no work to do?
Or did they wish that the presence of the citizens should adorn and
honor every festival always, and, above all, that one which was held
in commemoration of the consolidation of the city? Wherefore in order
that they might not leave the City, in whose honor the festival was
being held, it was not permitted to make use of vehicles on that
day."


AUC 1114 / 361 CE Restoration of Religious Tolerance.

The Emperor Julian the Blessed restored Religious Tolerance, opening
the Temples to the Gods once more and renewing the culti Deorum. At
the same time he forbade harm to Christians.

"I affirm by the Gods that I do not wish the Galilaeans to be either
put to death or unjustly beaten, or to suffer any other injury; but
nevertheless I do assert absolutely that the god-fearing must be
preferred to them. For through the folly of the Galilaeans almost
everything has been overturned, whereas through the grace of the Gods
are we all preserved. Wherefore we ought to honor the Gods and the
god-fearing, both men and cities." ~ Julian the Bless, Letter to
Atarbius

At Jerusalem he also set out to restore the Temple of Israel, writing
in a letter to the Jews, "I too shall build and populate, by my
efforts, after I successfully conclude my war against the Persians,
the holy city of Jerusalem, which for many years you have yearned to
see settled by yourselves, and together with you I shall give glory
to the very great God (Ammianus Marcellinus, Res Gestae Libri XXXI)."


Today's thought is from Julian the Blessed

"The first thing we ought to preach is reverence toward the Gods. For
it is fitting that we should perform our service to the Gods as
though They were Themselves present with us and beheld us, and though
not seen by us could direct Their gaze, which is more powerful than
any light, even as far as our hidden thoughts."
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 59889 From: Lucia Livia Plauta Date: 2008-12-11
Subject: Re: Semper ubi, sub ubi! Or the great women's undergarments p...
Salve Iunia,
be careful, because Fabius Maximus' information is not all that
accurate.
Of course Romans bathed naked (the baths, like turkish baths, were
either separate by sex or opened in different hours for women and
men).

But the Piazza Armerina mosaics have nothing to do with bathing!
The "bikini girls" were participants and winners of sports contests
(in honour of one god that I don't remember, and the website is not
accessible at the moment), as you can well see in the mosaic, and
Romans did not do sports naked, like Greeks. Men would wear a
subligar, or subligaculum (a loincloth), and women, as documented in
Piazza Armerina, might have worn "bikinis".
Women's sports contests where quite common, and in Rome there was
even an yearly race for the daughters of senators.

I don't know why Fabius Maximus assumes the bikinis were made of
leather: I see no way to establish that from the mosaics.

Also, while there's no direct evidence that people went bathing in
the sea, I suspect nothing else could explain the popularity of
summer resorts like Pompeii and Stabiae, so I suppose bikinis might
have also be used for sea bathing and swimming, in public contexts
where men might have been present too.

About swimming itself, some sources will tell you that Romans
couldn't swim, or at least not in modern styles, but the bathhouse
mosaics in Ostia have very clear depictions of men swimming in
"crawl" style.

Vale,
Livia


--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "fauxrari" <drivergirl@...> wrote:
>
> Thank you very much Maximus! That answered many of my questions and
> makes the experiment easier on my hands. I hate the libraries near
my
> house. Their books are not helpful at all. Being an alumna, I was
> thinking of going back to UCLA and seeing if I could find some
> information in one or more of their 13 libraries. Perhaps there's
> even a professor that could help? I will see.
>
> L. Iunia Bruta
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, QFabiusMaxmi@ wrote:
> >
> >
> > In a message dated 12/10/2008 1:22:55 P.M. Pacific Standard
Time,
> > cases@ writes:
> >
> > Don't worry about knitting: it didn't exist in roman times, and
> > neither did nalbinding, or at least one of the instruments to do
> it
> > would have been found. What existed is another technique that's
> done
> > by hand only, and of which I don't remember the name. Once I
found
> > the website of a woman who does that, but it's very time
> consuming. I
> > found it by perusing the Roman Army Talk forum, http://
> > www.romanarmy.www.romanarmy.<WBR>com/. This ofrum has at least s
> > posting and might prove useful.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Romans did not knit. There was a linen band that went under the
> breasts to
> > support them, but the usual under garment was a linen loin cloth
> > (subligariorum), though Cicero advises against men wearing them
> while wearing a toga.
> >
> > Since women are wearing stolas or tunicas they don't have the
same
> problem
> > as the men.
> >
> > The famous leather garments (the fascia pectoralis & subligar)
on
> the Ten
> > Girls room in the Piazza Armerina Villa in Sicily are not typical
> of Roman
> > under garments. The owner or his wife was a Christian, and the
> mosaic was dated
> > to 4th century CE. The cover up may be because of a Christian
> edict.
> >
> > One of Cassiodorus (490-573) comments quoted in Procopius is how
> the Roman
> > woman are no longer allowed to bathe naked thanks to some edict
> from a Bishop.
> > There is no date or edict ever found.
> >
> > Both Cicero, and Varro tells us that the women bathed naked
during
> the
> > Republic. Women in fact often had their separate baths.
> >
> > Q. Fabius Maximus
> >
> > **************Make your life easier with all your friends, email,
> and
> > favorite sites in one place. Try it now.
> > (http://www.aol.com/?optin=new-
> dp&icid=aolcom40vanity&ncid=emlcntaolcom00000010)
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 59890 From: Lucia Livia Plauta Date: 2008-12-11
Subject: Rome under water
L. Livia Plauta omnibus S.P.D.

After exceptional rains yesterday and last night, most of Rome is now
flooded. The Tiberis is reaching critical levels, metro and trains
are blocked.

You can have a look at this video, and also at the other videos and
photos linked from the same page:
http://roma.repubblica.it/multimedia/home/4051507


I guess it's time for the pontifices, flamines and sacerdotes of Nova
Roma to try and do something about it by sacrificing to the gods
responsible.

Optime valete,
Livia
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 59891 From: Publius Memmius Albucius Date: 2008-12-11
Subject: Re: Congratulations and Thanks
Consuli Moravio s.d.

Thanks for your words and wishes, and I hope sincerely that you will
stay at the disposal of our res publica, and both its civil ande
religious institutions, in order to go on working on the tracks that
you have opened this year.

Respectfully, vale bene Consul.



P. Memmius Albucius
pr. el.



--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "marcushoratius" <MHoratius@...>
wrote:
>
> M. Moravius Piscinus, Cons. Pon. Max. Aug. Quiritibus, Tribunibus
> Plebis, Aedili Plebis, et suffectis omnibus salutem plurimam dicit:
>
> Gratulor, et optimam fortunam vos ex opto.
>
> My thanks and congratulations first go out to the Quirites who
> participated in this year's elections.
>
> Congratulations go next to our newly elected Plebeian officers who
> enter office today:
>
> Pontifex Quintus Caecilius Metellus Pius Postumianus as Aedilis
> Plebis, and as Tribuni Plebis my former colleague, the exceptional
> Gaius Vipsanius Agrippa, my colleague Pontifex Flavius Galerius
> Aurelianus, Legatus Tiberius Horatius Barbatus, Gaius Pompeius
> Marcellus, and cultor Veneri Appius Galerius Aurelianus.
>
> Congratulations to a most deserving Gaius Popillius Laenas, mild-
> mannered, capable and knowledable, and ever available to serve the
> interests of the Res Publica. He is an excellent choice to serve
as
> Censor.
>
> Congratulations, too, to Marcus Curiatius Complutensis and M.
Iulius
> Severus who I am proud to call colleagues and friends. They have
> made a good team together this year as Praetores and shall prove to
> be excellent colleagues in the coming year.
>
> Congratulations to Gnaeus Equitius Marinus, who has often stood by
as
> my mentor and teacher; a man for whom I have the greatest respect.
> And of course to mon ami Publius Memmius Albucius, thoughful,
> humorous, and ever loquatious.
>
> Congratulations to Gnaius Iulius Caesar on his election as Aedilis
> Curulis and on his adlection as Senator.
>
> Congratulations to all of the other newly elected magistrates
> suffecti. I regret that I am not familiar with all of you. From
> those I do know, I think we have many capable Quaestores for next
> year, beginning with Tribuna Lucia Livia Plauta whose company I
> enjoyed at this year's Conventus. I am of course familiar with
> Flamines Gaius Petronius Dexter and Quintus Valerius Poplicola, and
I
> have worked with Tribunus Titus Flavius Aquila in different areas.
> All I trust to serve well, and those whom I did not mention by
name,
> I know from reputation that they too will serve well. Of all the
> newly elected Quaestores I would like to single out Gaius Arminius
> Reccanellus who has served before as Tribunus and as Quaestor, as
> well as in many other roles in provincia Brasilia and in noster Res
> Publica Libera. He was a very worthy candidate and I am certain he
> shall serve as a most worthy magistrate. My best to him and to
little
> Gaius as well.
>
> Congratulations, too, to Titus Arminius Genialis, another
magistrate
> from Brasilia who has served in many roles and offices, including
> Quaestor. Likewise his colleague, the former Praetrix, Senatrix
Aula
> Tullia Scholastica who is well experienced and a good choice for
the
> office of Rogator.
>
> As we have seen this year, and in most past years, the office of
> Custos is given little attention and yet fills an important
position
> in our Res Public. This year's lone Custos, Stephanus Ullerius
> Venator Piperbarbus, I believe has set a example for the office,
> persevering with cool deliberation while under pressure that seems
to
> always attend our elections. For the coming year we shall have two
> Custodes, each equal to the task. Luci Salix Cicero, care amice,
> congratulations. Salix is one of my personal friends whom I have
> known for many years. His mild and patient demeanor, and his solid
> character are well suited to the office. And Marcus Lucretius
> Agrícola, I will gladly call friend and swear by the Gods that in
the
> most difficult situations he has been indispensible this year. A
> very big thank you, Agricola, for all the work you've done this
year
> and continue to do. And congratulations on your election as
Custos,
> as this shall be a much deserved vacation for you.
>
> For Diribitores we look for dependablity, integrity, honesty, and
the
> willingness to perform their duties under difficult conditions with
> little recognition. Senatrix Annia Minucia Marcella exemplfies
those
> qualities and much more. Legatus M. Octavius Corvus, sacerdos
Iovis,
> is quickly becoming a model Citizen. Marcus Valerius Traianus and
C.
> Terentius Varro have both been Citizens for many years and are now
> just beginning their public careers. It is a good combination we
have
> for next year Diribitores.
>
> Over all, I think we have received a very fine selection of
officers
> for next year. So congratulations, and thanks, to all Citizens of
> Nova Roma. May next year prove beneficial, prosperous and happy
for
> our Res Publica.
>
>
> Finally, as Consul Maior, I wish to extend special thanks on behalf
> of Nova Roma to this year's Custos and Diribitores.
>
> Gratias magnas Res Publica Populi Novi Romani, Quirites, vos agit,
> Custos Stephane Ulleri Venator Piperbarbe et Ditibitores Marce
> Martiani Lupe, Cai Aemili Crasse, Sexte Postumi Albe, et Gai Iuli
> Adventor.
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 59892 From: James V Hooper Date: 2008-12-11
Subject: Re: Rome under water
Salve,
Never heard of this happening in history but I'm sure it did. I do
remember that one of Julius Caesar' projects was to build a caal to divert
the Tiber, and drain a swampy area as well as control flooding. Does anyone
else have knowledge of this?
Valete,
Gauis Pompeius Marcellus


On Thu, 11 Dec 2008 15:07:45 -0000
"Lucia Livia Plauta" <cases@...> wrote:
> L. Livia Plauta omnibus S.P.D.
>
> After exceptional rains yesterday and last night, most of Rome is now
> flooded. The Tiberis is reaching critical levels, metro and trains
> are blocked.
>
> You can have a look at this video, and also at the other videos and
> photos linked from the same page:
> http://roma.repubblica.it/multimedia/home/4051507
>
>
> I guess it's time for the pontifices, flamines and sacerdotes of Nova
> Roma to try and do something about it by sacrificing to the gods
> responsible.
>
> Optime valete,
> Livia
>

BB,
Warrior
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 59893 From: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com Date: 2008-12-11
Subject: Online Resources for Classics Study and Research, 12/12/2008, 12:00
Reminder from:   Nova-Roma Yahoo! Group
 
Title:   Online Resources for Classics Study and Research
 
Date:   Friday December 12, 2008
Time:   All Day
Repeats:   This event repeats every month.
Notes:   An extensive list of online resources for Classics study is available on our website: http://www.novaroma.org/nr/Library_(Nova_Roma)

 
Copyright © 2008  Yahoo! Inc. All Rights Reserved | Terms of Service | Privacy Policy
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 59894 From: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com Date: 2008-12-11
Subject: Nova Roma has Amazon shops!, 12/12/2008, 12:00 am
Reminder from:   Nova-Roma Yahoo! Group
 
Title:   Nova Roma has Amazon shops!
 
Date:   Friday December 12, 2008
Time:   All Day
Repeats:   This event repeats every Monday, Wednesday, and Friday until Wednesday December 31, 2008.
Notes:   Nova Roma now has Amazon shops! Buy through these shops and a portion of your price is returned to Nova Roma. See http://www.novaroma.org/nr/Amazon_affiliate for links.
 
Copyright © 2008  Yahoo! Inc. All Rights Reserved | Terms of Service | Privacy Policy
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 59895 From: hikerbill40 Date: 2008-12-11
Subject: Re: Rome under water
Salve!
 
See http://roma.freewebpages.org/roma-c4.htm

--- On Thu, 12/11/08, James V Hooper <warrior44_us@...> wrote:
From: James V Hooper <warrior44_us@...>
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Rome under water
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Date: Thursday, December 11, 2008, 6:33 PM

Salve,
Never heard of this happening in history but I'm sure it did. I do
remember that one of Julius Caesar' projects was to build a caal to divert
the Tiber, and drain a swampy area as well as control flooding. Does anyone
else have knowledge of this?
Valete,
Gauis Pompeius Marcellus

On Thu, 11 Dec 2008 15:07:45 -0000
"Lucia Livia Plauta" <cases@freemail. hu> wrote:
> L. Livia Plauta omnibus S.P.D.
>
> After exceptional rains yesterday and last night, most of Rome is now
> flooded. The Tiberis is reaching critical levels, metro and trains
> are blocked.
>
> You can have a look at this video, and also at the other videos and
> photos linked from the same page:
> http://roma. repubblica. it/multimedia/ home/4051507
>
>
> I guess it's time for the pontifices, flamines and sacerdotes of Nova
> Roma to try and do something about it by sacrificing to the gods
> responsible.
>
> Optime valete,
> Livia
>

BB,
Warrior

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 59896 From: QFabiusMaxmi@aol.com Date: 2008-12-11
Subject: Re: Semper ubi, sub ubi! Or the great women's undergarments p...
In a message dated 12/11/2008 6:00:28 A.M. Pacific Standard Time, cases@... writes:
Salve Iunia,
be careful, because Fabius Maximus' information is not all that
accurate.
Of course Romans bathed naked (the baths, like turkish baths, were
either separate by sex or opened in different hours for women and
men).

But the Piazza Armerina mosaics have nothing to do with bathing!
The "bikini girls" were participants and winners of sports contests
(in honour of one god that I don't remember, and the website is not
accessible at the moment), as you can well see in the mosaic, and
Romans did not do sports naked, like Greeks. Men would wear a
subligar, or subligaculum (a loincloth), and women, as documented in
Piazza Armerina, might have worn "bikinis".
Women's sports contests where quite common, and in Rome there was
even an yearly race for the daughters of senators.
 
And what does this have to do with underwear?  And Romans could exercise naked, they were not modest.
 
You said that these pieces were modeled after womens' under wear.  I said they were not. 
If women were competing in sports they would wear the tunica, which was the standard long tunic that came down to the mid thigh.  They would not wear leather bikinis.  The original mosaic was likely designed to be naked, and the Christians covered it.  As for what the Roman women wore in the communal baths in Christian era we don't know, but Ovidus mentions them as naked in the Early Principate.  Early Romans would laugh at the idea of getting clothes wet while bathing!
 
Q. Fabius Maximus       



Group: Nova-Roma Message: 59897 From: Gaius Petronius Dexter Date: 2008-12-12
Subject: Re: Rome under water
C. Petronius C. Pompeio s.p.d.,

The emperor Trajan made a canal to control the Tiber, but on year 105
AD it was a big flooding with many days of famine.

Great floodings during Augustus principate:
27 BC (the Regia and the Vestae Aedes destroyed), 23 BC, Rome
navigable during three days, 22 BC, 13 BC, Balbus goes to his theatre
on boat ! 5 AD Rome navigable during one week...

O Iane pater, O Portune pater,
ambo propitii Romae estote !
Tiberis undas parcitote !
Iovis imbres placate.

Caelum serenum denuo siet.
Roma sub caelo sereno siet.

O Iane pater, O Jupiter Optime Maxime,
O Portune pater,Propitii Romae estote !

Optime vale.

C. Petronius Dexter
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 59898 From: fauxrari Date: 2008-12-12
Subject: Re: Semper ubi, sub ubi! Or the great women's undergarments p...
Thank you Livia, thank you Maximus. I appreciate whatever information
anyone can give me. It seems that there's a lot of conjectures about
how people wore thier undergarments/bikinis and what they were made
out of. I hope that that we can come up with a lot of useful
information about this subject that we can share with others. I'm
really hoping that UCLA has more information. If I can crack into
their scholarly articles, I'm sure there's something there. I just
don't know if I can seeing as I graduated already.

Thanks!
L. Iunia Bruta soon to be known as Lucia Antonia Auriga
(Upon the kind help of my new friend Cornelius Lentulus who steered
me away from convention and made me the most best cognomen ever as
I'm a race car driver! Thank you!)

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Lucia Livia Plauta" <cases@...>
wrote:
>
> Salve Iunia,
> be careful, because Fabius Maximus' information is not all that
> accurate.
> Of course Romans bathed naked (the baths, like turkish baths, were
> either separate by sex or opened in different hours for women and
> men).
>
> But the Piazza Armerina mosaics have nothing to do with bathing!
> The "bikini girls" were participants and winners of sports contests
> (in honour of one god that I don't remember, and the website is not
> accessible at the moment), as you can well see in the mosaic, and
> Romans did not do sports naked, like Greeks. Men would wear a
> subligar, or subligaculum (a loincloth), and women, as documented
in
> Piazza Armerina, might have worn "bikinis".
> Women's sports contests where quite common, and in Rome there was
> even an yearly race for the daughters of senators.
>
> I don't know why Fabius Maximus assumes the bikinis were made of
> leather: I see no way to establish that from the mosaics.
>
> Also, while there's no direct evidence that people went bathing in
> the sea, I suspect nothing else could explain the popularity of
> summer resorts like Pompeii and Stabiae, so I suppose bikinis might
> have also be used for sea bathing and swimming, in public contexts
> where men might have been present too.
>
> About swimming itself, some sources will tell you that Romans
> couldn't swim, or at least not in modern styles, but the bathhouse
> mosaics in Ostia have very clear depictions of men swimming in
> "crawl" style.
>
> Vale,
> Livia
>
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "fauxrari" <drivergirl@> wrote:
> >
> > Thank you very much Maximus! That answered many of my questions
and
> > makes the experiment easier on my hands. I hate the libraries
near
> my
> > house. Their books are not helpful at all. Being an alumna, I was
> > thinking of going back to UCLA and seeing if I could find some
> > information in one or more of their 13 libraries. Perhaps there's
> > even a professor that could help? I will see.
> >
> > L. Iunia Bruta
> >
> > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, QFabiusMaxmi@ wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > In a message dated 12/10/2008 1:22:55 P.M. Pacific Standard
> Time,
> > > cases@ writes:
> > >
> > > Don't worry about knitting: it didn't exist in roman times,
and
> > > neither did nalbinding, or at least one of the instruments to
do
> > it
> > > would have been found. What existed is another technique
that's
> > done
> > > by hand only, and of which I don't remember the name. Once I
> found
> > > the website of a woman who does that, but it's very time
> > consuming. I
> > > found it by perusing the Roman Army Talk forum, http://
> > > www.romanarmy.www.romanarmy.<WBR>com/. This ofrum has at least
s
> > > posting and might prove useful.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Romans did not knit. There was a linen band that went under
the
> > breasts to
> > > support them, but the usual under garment was a linen loin
cloth
> > > (subligariorum), though Cicero advises against men wearing them
> > while wearing a toga.
> > >
> > > Since women are wearing stolas or tunicas they don't have the
> same
> > problem
> > > as the men.
> > >
> > > The famous leather garments (the fascia pectoralis & subligar)
> on
> > the Ten
> > > Girls room in the Piazza Armerina Villa in Sicily are not
typical
> > of Roman
> > > under garments. The owner or his wife was a Christian, and
the
> > mosaic was dated
> > > to 4th century CE. The cover up may be because of a Christian
> > edict.
> > >
> > > One of Cassiodorus (490-573) comments quoted in Procopius is
how
> > the Roman
> > > woman are no longer allowed to bathe naked thanks to some edict
> > from a Bishop.
> > > There is no date or edict ever found.
> > >
> > > Both Cicero, and Varro tells us that the women bathed naked
> during
> > the
> > > Republic. Women in fact often had their separate baths.
> > >
> > > Q. Fabius Maximus
> > >
> > > **************Make your life easier with all your friends,
email,
> > and
> > > favorite sites in one place. Try it now.
> > > (http://www.aol.com/?optin=new-
> > dp&icid=aolcom40vanity&ncid=emlcntaolcom00000010)
> > >
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 59899 From: marcushoratius Date: 2008-12-12
Subject: Pridie Eidus Decembris: feriae Conso in Aventino
M. Moravius Piscinus Horatianus Quiritibus et omnibus salutem
plurimam dicit: Deus Consus vos porrigat.

Hodie est die pristini Eidus Decembris; haec dies endotercisus est:
feriae Conso in Aventino sacrificium. Equi et muli floribus
coronantur quod in eius tutula sunt itaque rex equo vectus

Vindolanda's Portable Roman Calendar

This past July a unique discovery took place along Hadrian's Wall at
Vindolanda. This was the discovery of a piece of a portable, metal,
perpetual calendar used by the Roman army. It is the first of its
kind discovered, and only the third portable calendar found thus
far. The others were a Roman's bronze menologium, or register of
months, found in 1886 at Grand, France, and a Celtic bronze tablet
discovered in 1897 at Coligny, France. The Vindolanda example is a
curved piece showing the month of September, presumably from a
circular or semi-circle calendar. The days were counted by placing a
peg in one of the holes every other day. That is, only the odd-
numbered days were recorded, possibly as these were considered the
fortunate days. An article on the find, with photos, can be found at
http://www.dorset-archaeology.org.uk/newsletters/2008-10.pdf and also
in the Jan/Feb 2009 issue of Archaeology magazine.


The Festival of Consus and Endotercisus Days

Eight days in the calendar year are noted as endotercisus (cut into
parts), today being one, and all of them coming on the day before a
festival or the Ides. "The intercisi dies are those on which legal
business is nefas in the morning hours (mane) and in the evening
hours (vesperi), but are fastus between the slaying of the
sacrificial victim and the offering of the vital organs, as they are
stretched over the altars. (Varro, L. L. 6.31)." The significance
here on 12 December is not particularly known, but some idea may be
offered.

"At the festival of the Vinalia, the flamen Dialis makes an official
commencement of the vintage, and when he has given orders to gather
the grapes, he sacrifices a lamb to Jupiter, and between the cutting
out of the victim's vital organs and offering them up to the God he
himself first plucks a bunch of grapes (Varro, L. L. 6.16)."

In the same fashion, at other festivals, the characteristic action
like harvesting a bunch of grapes at Vinalia or, at other Latin and
Sabine cities, the special priests called Semones ritually sowing the
fields, were performed during the sacrifice, as part of the
sacremental ritual. For the Consualia of December alone there is a
special annotation in the fasti Praeneste of which Mommsen's
reconstruction is given above (CIL 237). Horses and mules were
crowned in wreathes of flowers, and the Rex conveyed through the City
on horseback. It is known from Dionysus and Festus that horse races
and races of mules were held on this day (Dion. 2.3 ff; Festus p.
148).

The reference to the sacrifice being on the Aventine would actually
signify the Circus Maximus beneath the Aventine Hill. The altar of
Consus was located in an underground chamber beneath the Circus
Maximus. It was surrounded, in a later period, by images of His
indigitementa: Seia for sown seeds of grain in the ground; Segetia
for the grain as it ripens above ground; Messor as the grain is
reaped, and then Tutilina for grain as it is stored.

The sacrifice was performed by the flamen Quirinalis in the presence
of the Vestales Virgines, down in this chamber within the Circus
Maximus. That is, the sacrifice was begun in the morning. The races
were then carried out before the sacrifice was completed. A question
remains as to whether the reference to a Rex is intended to mean the
winner of the horse races, or perhaps the Rex Sacrorum, although
there is no indication that either would be found here. The flamen
Quirinalis is found at another rite later in December when he stands
in for Romulus in performing a parentatio for Rhea Silvia. There is,
of course, the close association of Romulus with the Consualia of
August, at which festival occurred the rape of the Sabine women.
Generally this legend is connected with the Consualia of August
rather than either of the two festivals of Consus in December.
However, Romulus and later kings probably conducted these rites
rather than any of the flamines, and thus there is still some
remembrance of this earlier time in the fasti Praeneste, even as late
as this annotation is.


Our thought for today is from Stobaeus, Ethical Sentences 17:

"Neither is it possible to conceal fire in a garment, nor, in time, a
base deviation from rectitude."


Our thought for today is from Epictetus, Enchiridion 46:

"Never proclaim yourself a philosopher; nor make much talk among the
ignorant about your principles, but show them by actions. Thus, at an
entertainment, do not discourse how people ought to eat; but eat as
you ought. For remember that thus Socrates also universally avoided
all ostentation. And when persons came to him, and desired to be
introduced by him to philosophers, he took them and introduced them;
so well did he bear being overlooked. So if ever there should be
among the ignorant any discussion of principles, be for the most part
silent. For there is great danger in hastily throwing out what is
undigested. And if any one tells you that you know nothing, and you
are not nettled at it, then you may be sure that you have really
entered on your work. For sheep do not hastily throw up the grass, to
show the shepherds how much they have eaten; but, inwardly digesting
their food, they produce it outwardly in wool and milk. Thus,
therefore, do you not make an exhibition before the ignorant of your
principles; but of the actions to which their digestion gives rise."
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 59900 From: Gaius Petronius Dexter Date: 2008-12-12
Subject: Today in Rome: Dec 12, 2008.
C. Petronius Dexter omnibus Quiritibus s.p.d.,
 
Today in Rome :
 
(Julian day : 2 454 813).
 
Pridie Idus Decembres
MMDCCLXI anno Vrbis conditae.
Coss. M. Moravio T. Iulio.
 
Day of the week : Veneris dies (Friday).
 
Lunaris dies: XVI.
Nundinal letter : B.
Plena Luna.
 
Hora ortus Solis : 07:28.
Hora occasus Solis : 16:39.
Temp. Min. : 8° C.
Temp. Max. : 12° C.
Wind on Rome : 32 Km/h.
Humidity: 80%.
Weather: Showers. Clouds. Cool.
 
O Iane pater, O Portune pater, 
ambo benigni Romae estote !
Tiberis undas parcitote !
Iovis imbres placate.
 
Caelum serenum denuo siet.
Roma sub caelo sereno siet.
 
O Iane pater, o Portune pater
O Jupiter Optime Maxime
Propitii Romae estote !
 
Horae diei :
 
I: 07:28 - 08:13 Lunae hora.
II: 08:13 - 08:58 Saturni hora.
III: 08:58 - 09:44 Iovis hora.
IV: 09:44 - 10:29 Martis hora.
V: 10:29 - 11:14 Solis hora.
VI: 11:14 - 12:00 Veneris hora.
VII: 12:00 - 12:46 Mercurii hora.
VIII: 12:46 - 13:33 Lunae hora.
IX: 13:33 - 14:19 Saturni hora.
X: 14:19 - 15:06 Iovis hora.
XI: 15:06 - 15:52 Martis hora.
XII: 15:52 - 16:39 Solis hora.
 

Horae noctis :
 
I: 16:39 - 17:52 Veneris hora.
II: 17:52 - 19:06 Mercurii hora.
III: 19:06 - 20:19 Lunae hora.
IV: 20:19 - 21:33 Saturni hora.
V: 21:33 - 22:46 Iovis hora.
VI: 22:46 - 00:00 Martis hora.
VII: 00:00 - 01:14 Solis hora.
VIII: 01:14 - 02:29 Veneris hora.
IX: 02:29 - 03:44 Mercurii hora.
X: 03:44 - 04:59 Lunae hora.
XI: 04:59 - 06:14 Saturni hora.
XII: 06:14 - 07:29 Iovis hora.
 
Valete.
 
C. Petronius Dexter.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 59901 From: Lucia Livia Plauta Date: 2008-12-12
Subject: Re: Semper ubi, sub ubi! Or the great women's undergarments p...
Salve Q. Fabi Maxime,
>
> And what does this have to do with underwear? And Romans could
exercise
> naked, they were not modest.
>
While the could, they didn't. There are plenty of sourges about this.

> You said that these pieces were modeled after womens' under wear.
I said
> they were not.

Who said that what pieces were modeled after women's underwear?

> If women were competing in sports they would wear the tunica, which
was the
> standard long tunic that came down to the mid thigh.


While it's possible, there's no evidence of this. Possibly they would
wear tunics or bikinis, according to the season.


They would not wear
> leather bikinis.

Again, why do you assome the bikinis were leather? From the mosaics
there's no way to assume that.

The only evidence of leather underwear is men's briefs that have been
found in Vindolanda.


The original mosaic was likely designed to be naked, and the
> Christians covered it.

The website of the Piazza Armerina villa (http://
www.villaromanadelcasale.net/) has been redesigned, and now the
mosaic photos are substituted by Flash animations that none of my
browsers will read, but enough of the website is still readable to
see that the villa included a sanctuary for Ceres and Proserpina.
(Now that I think of it I suppose the girls were competing in games
in honour of Proserpina).
There's no evidence at all to suggest that the owner was christian,
or that mosaics were tampered with later by Christians.
There is no evicence at all nowhere of mosaics that have been
tampered with by Christians the way you suggest. Painting fig leaves
over nudes was a practice that started in the 17th century.
In the middle ages Christians would deface statues and paintings by
poking out their eyes or decapitating them.


As for what the Roman women wore in the communal baths
> in Christian era we don't know, but Ovidus mentions them as naked
in the
> Early Principate. Early Romans would laugh at the idea of getting
clothes wet
> while bathing!
>
Logically enough, people continued to bathe naked all along the early
Middle Ages. That's the main reason why the Church made all those
crusades against bathing.


Optime vale,
Livia
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 59902 From: sixthcenturykatafractos Date: 2008-12-12
Subject: Re: Semper ubi, sub ubi! Or the great women's undergarments p...
Ugh people, let's define our terms.
Does "Roman" mean Romulas to Constantine XI ?
Does it mean the republic ending in 27BCE ?

Knitting is found in the Roman Empire ruins in Dura_Europas. I can
cunsult my copy of the Final Dig Report for Textiles and give the ID
#'s if you like.

I know that Knitting, Sprang and Nalbinding were found in 4th, 5th
and 6th century Situations in Egypt. These items were made and used
by people that described themselves as Roman.


My research into clothing of the 1st cent BCE/1st cent CE is just
starting but I would hesitate to rule out these techniques completly.
Since stainless steel wasn't developed, knitting and nalbinding
needles would have been wood or bone; they may not have survived.
Also, the men excavating the Roman sites may not have recognised them
for what they are and they could be sitting , mislabeled, in a drawer
somewhere.
When the Antioch exhibit toured a few years ago the was a photo of
One of the drawers of unaccesioned, unidentified small objects from
the origanl dig in the 30's (if I remember correctly).

Let's keep an open mind about some of the alternative means of
clothing production.

Rufus


--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, QFabiusMaxmi@... wrote:
>
>
> In a message dated 12/10/2008 1:22:55 P.M. Pacific Standard Time,
> cases@... writes:
>
> Don't worry about knitting: it didn't exist in roman times, and
> neither did nalbinding, or at least one of the instruments to do
it
> would have been found. What existed is another technique that's
done
> by hand only, and of which I don't remember the name. Once I found
> the website of a woman who does that, but it's very time
consuming. I
> found it by perusing the Roman Army Talk forum, http://
> www.romanarmy.www.romanarmy.<WBR>com/. This ofrum has at least s
> posting and might prove useful.
>
>
>
>
> Romans did not knit. There was a linen band that went under the
breasts to
> support them, but the usual under garment was a linen loin cloth
> (subligariorum), though Cicero advises against men wearing them
while wearing a toga.
>
> Since women are wearing stolas or tunicas they don't have the same
problem
> as the men.
>
> The famous leather garments (the fascia pectoralis & subligar) on
the Ten
> Girls room in the Piazza Armerina Villa in Sicily are not typical
of Roman
> under garments. The owner or his wife was a Christian, and the
mosaic was dated
> to 4th century CE. The cover up may be because of a Christian
edict.
>
> One of Cassiodorus (490-573) comments quoted in Procopius is how
the Roman
> woman are no longer allowed to bathe naked thanks to some edict
from a Bishop.
> There is no date or edict ever found.
>
> Both Cicero, and Varro tells us that the women bathed naked during
the
> Republic. Women in fact often had their separate baths.
>
> Q. Fabius Maximus
>
> **************Make your life easier with all your friends, email,
and
> favorite sites in one place. Try it now.
> (http://www.aol.com/?optin=new-
dp&icid=aolcom40vanity&ncid=emlcntaolcom00000010)
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 59903 From: Lucia Livia Plauta Date: 2008-12-12
Subject: Re: Semper ubi, sub ubi! Or the great women's undergarments p...
Salve Rufe,

>
> Ugh people, let's define our terms.
> Does "Roman" mean Romulas to Constantine XI ?
> Does it mean the republic ending in 27BCE ?
>
What we are most interested in is republican Rome.

> Knitting is found in the Roman Empire ruins in Dura_Europas. I can
> cunsult my copy of the Final Dig Report for Textiles and give the
ID
> #'s if you like.
>
Please, do!

> I know that Knitting, Sprang and Nalbinding were found in 4th, 5th
> and 6th century Situations in Egypt. These items were made and used
> by people that described themselves as Roman.
>
All of those in all the centuries you mentioned? What you mention are
usually referred to as Coptic textiles. I've seen an exhibition with
a good selection of those, but only woven textiles were displayed.
Textile archaeologists draw a lot on these examples, but they always
warn that there's not evidence that the techniques used in coptic
Egipt were exactly the same as those used earlier and in other
regions.

Hopefully early next year I'll be able to visit a huge exhibition of
Herculaneum finds in Naples, which for the first time displays all
the textiles. These will be much more relevant for the region and
time frame we are iterested in.

If anyone can, it's a good idea to plan a trip to Naples, because the
exhibition has also an incredible number of beautiful bronze
sculptures, and it's only open until April.

>
> My research into clothing of the 1st cent BCE/1st cent CE is just
> starting but I would hesitate to rule out these techniques
completly.

If they were used they were not commonly used (except sprang), so
they can be ruled out for practical purposes.

> Since stainless steel wasn't developed, knitting and nalbinding
> needles would have been wood or bone; they may not have survived.
> Also, the men excavating the Roman sites may not have recognised
them
> for what they are and they could be sitting , mislabeled, in a
drawer
> somewhere.

Needles would have been BRONZE, wood or bone. In Egypt, wood and bone
artifacts have survived with no problems.
Knitting needles would be very hard to recognize, but a nalbinding
needle would be hard to mistake for something else.

Anyway, I'll be prepared to take your hypotheses into account when
you show me a literary source about old ladies knitting by the
fireplace, or a greek vase showing a woman nalbinding.
Unfortunately there are none of those, so far, versus the huge number
of references to weaving and depictions of it on vases and paintings.

Face it: any technique other than weaving was possible, but
irrelevant.

Optime vale,
Livia
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 59904 From: Lucia Livia Plauta Date: 2008-12-12
Subject: Re: Rome under water
L. Livia C. Petronio sal.

Thanks for your prayer! Let's hope it will be useful! The critical
time for Tiber level will be today between 20:00 and midnight.

Between October 28 and today almost as much rain has fallen in Rome
(400,7 mm.) as in the whole year 2007 (443,6 mm.).
What's weird is that the same is happening all over Italy, and
apparently in other parts of the world too (someone mentioned a place
in Brazil where some of our citizens live).

Optime vale,
Livia

>
> C. Petronius C. Pompeio s.p.d.,
>
> The emperor Trajan made a canal to control the Tiber, but on year
105
> AD it was a big flooding with many days of famine.
>
> Great floodings during Augustus principate:
> 27 BC (the Regia and the Vestae Aedes destroyed), 23 BC, Rome
> navigable during three days, 22 BC, 13 BC, Balbus goes to his
theatre
> on boat ! 5 AD Rome navigable during one week...
>
> O Iane pater, O Portune pater,
> ambo propitii Romae estote !
> Tiberis undas parcitote !
> Iovis imbres placate.
>
> Caelum serenum denuo siet.
> Roma sub caelo sereno siet.
>
> O Iane pater, O Jupiter Optime Maxime,
> O Portune pater,Propitii Romae estote !
>
> Optime vale.
>
> C. Petronius Dexter
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 59905 From: L Julia Aquila Date: 2008-12-12
Subject: Re: Rome under water

Salvéte,

 

Thank you Livia for keeping us updated and so far those I know in Italia are well. I have watched a few clips sent to me by a dear friend who lives in Rome and they had quite a visual impact.

 

Dexter, beautiful prayer as always. I have saved it for future reference; I do hope this is ok.

 

These floods combined with other facts give me cause to ponder that the gods themselves have urged the sacred waters to cleanse or purge a mal condition.  The sacred river is scheduled to rise further in Roma coinciding with the rise of the full moon. Prayers to Iuppiter, Father Tiber (Tiberinus) etc. to stop the flooding should be supplemented by prayers to the gods to also protect Roma's citizens and their possessions while this cleansing takes place.

These scourges of the Tiber are recorded from antiquity, with the worst (recorded) on Dies Natalis 1598 as a result of  a hurricane speed wind (Sirocco)from the Mediterranean, and for those who know their history, that was a time of great pollution.

Today the holy waters of the Tiber need purification from the pollution due to the utter disregard many in today's society have for this sacred element (and the others); in order to remain sacred the flood will remove the evil influences from them. Prayers may also be offered to the numina of this sacred water. In addition to our appointed Priests' guidance, offering sacrifices and evocations, every citizen should attend to prayers in their private lararium in the interest of the citizens of our fatherland.

 

Tomorrow is Telluri, for our ancient Terra Mater, and with the Flood and all it signifies on my mind my sacrifice and prayers will have deep significance for the world I live in, for those I love and cherish, for my friends and for my fellow citizens.

"Let Tellus, fertile in fruits and herds, present Ceres with a crown of wheat stalks; let the healthy waters and breezes of Jupiter nourish the offspring." - Horace, Carm. Saec. 29- 32

 

Cúráte ut valeátis optimé,

 

Julia Aquila


Group: Nova-Roma Message: 59906 From: Maxima Valeria Messallina Date: 2008-12-12
Subject: Re: What are we?
And yours are very good thoughts. Please continue to share them with us.
 
Maxima Valeria Messallina
Sacerdos Vestalis


--- On Fri, 12/5/08, Stefn Ullerius Venator Piperbarbus <famila.ulleria.venii@...> wrote:
From: Stefn Ullerius Venator Piperbarbus <famila.ulleria.venii@...>
Subject: [Nova-Roma] What are we?
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Date: Friday, December 5, 2008, 7:39 PM

Salus et fortuna omnes;

I know that the elections are still undecided as yet...but the
strength of the Res Publica is in the People, not the officials.

I have been a Cives Nova Romana since Quinctilis (July) MMDCCLI AUC
so, I've seen all but the very beginning (only 77 men and women signed
on before me).

Our Res Publica IS, in some ways, a world spanning nation; just look
at the number of time zones we cover.

Our actual, taxpaying population, comprises a healthy group of state
(USA) or provincial size.

Our ambitions SHOULD be as big as the future is long.

Our expectations should be as large as we are.

Just a thought or two...

============ ========= ====
In amicitia quod fides -
Stephanus Ullerius Venator Piperbarbus
Senator et Custos
Civis, Patrician, Paterfamilias et Lictor

Religio Septentrionalis - Poetus

Dominus Sodalitas Coquuorum et Cerevisiae Coctorum
http://groups. yahoo.com/ group/Sodalis_ Coq_et_Coq/

http://www.myspace. com/venator_ poetus
http://anheathenrea der.blogspot. com/
http://ullarsskald0 1.Writing. Com/
http://piparskeggrs kald.podbean. com/
http://www.catamoun t-grange- hearth.org/
http://www.cafepres s.com/catamountg range
--
May the Holy Powers smile on our efforts.
May the Spirits of our family lines nod in approval.
May we be of Worth to our fellow Nova Romans.

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 59907 From: QFabiusMaxmi@aol.com Date: 2008-12-13
Subject: Re: Semper ubi, sub ubi! Or the great women's undergarments p...
In a message dated 12/12/2008 2:52:18 A.M. Pacific Standard Time, drivergirl@... writes:
I just
don't know if I can seeing as I graduated already.
Of course you can.  You can get an alumni library card.
 
We don't have a lot on Roman undergarments at UCLA.  Of course I was interested in mostly Ancient military history and the Religio during my stay there.  There was a Roman clothing project at USD, AIR, in the '90s but I have no idea where that info would be.  When we were shooting  History Channel Roman dramatization we got most of our Roman clothing from Western Costume on Van Owen in Burbank.  Western has supplied Roman props for productions from the '60s.  Some of their stuff is good, other just terrible.  It helps to know what you are looking for when you get into their warehouse.  The Roman section alone takes up about 6, 50 foot rows.
 
Q. Fabius Maximus  



Group: Nova-Roma Message: 59908 From: QFabiusMaxmi@aol.com Date: 2008-12-13
Subject: Re: Semper ubi, sub ubi! Or the great women's undergarments p...
In a message dated 12/12/2008 9:04:50 A.M. Pacific Standard Time, barak@... writes:
Ugh people, let's define our terms.
Does "Roman" mean Romulas to Constantine XI ?
Does it mean the republic ending in 27BCE ?

Knitting is found in the Roman Empire ruins in Dura_Europas. I can
cunsult my copy of the Final Dig Report for Textiles and give the ID
#'s if you like.
I'm sorry.  I refer to Roman as things started or brought from Italia.  Knitting is an Egyptian import, it is not Roman.  Dura Europas was occupied by the Parthians, Palmyrenes, Sassanid Persians, and Arabs.  So finding clothes knitted, does not make it Roman.
 
The Republic ends at the Battle of Philippi, November 42 bce.
 
Q. Fabius Maximus  



Group: Nova-Roma Message: 59909 From: Gaius Petronius Dexter Date: 2008-12-13
Subject: Today in Rome: Dec 13, 2008.
C. Petronius Dexter omnibus Quiritibus s.p.d.,
 
Today in Rome :
 
(Julian day : 2 454 814).
 
Idibus Decembribus
MMDCCLXI anno Vrbis conditae.
Coss. M. Moravio T. Iulio.
 
Day of the week : Saturni dies (Saturday).
 
Lunaris dies: XVII.
Nundinal letter : C.
 
Hora ortus Solis : 07:29.
Hora occasus Solis : 16:39.
Temp. Min. : 8° C.
Temp. Max. : 13° C.
Wind on Rome : 18 Km/h.
Humidity: 75%.
Weather: More sun than clouds. Cool.
 
Horae diei :
 
I: 07:29 - 08:14 Martis hora.
II: 08:14 - 08:59 Solis hora.
III: 08:59 - 09:44 Veneris hora.
IV: 09:44 - 10:29 Mercurii hora.
V: 10:29 - 11:14 Lunae hora.
VI: 11:14 - 12:00 Saturni hora.
VII: 12:00 - 12:46 Iovis hora.
VIII: 12:46 - 13:33 Martis hora.
IX: 13:33 - 14:19 Solis hora.
X: 14:19 - 15:06 Veneris hora.
XI: 15:06 - 15:52 Mercurii hora.
XII: 15:52 - 16:39 Lunae hora.
 

Horae noctis :
 
I: 16:39 - 17:52 Saturni hora.
II: 17:52 - 19:06 Iovis hora.
III: 19:06 - 20:19 Martis hora.
IV: 20:19 - 21:33 Solis hora.
V: 21:33 - 22:46 Veneris hora.
VI: 22:46 - 00:00 Mercurii hora.
VII: 00:00 - 01:14 Lunae hora.
VIII: 01:14 - 02:29 Saturni hora.
IX: 02:29 - 03:44 Iovis hora.
X: 03:44 - 04:59 Martis hora.
XI: 04:59 - 06:14 Solis hora.
XII: 06:14 - 07:29 Veneris hora.
 

Valete.
 
C. Petronius Dexter.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 59910 From: marcushoratius Date: 2008-12-13
Subject: EIDUS DECEMBRIS: Telleri Lecisternium Cereri
M. Moravius Piscinus Horatianus Quiritibus et omnibus salutem
plurimam dicit: Bona vos Tellus Ceresque aucent ope

Hodie est Idae Decembrae; haec dies nefastus principio est: Telluri
lecisternium Cereri in Carinis; Sementivae Telluris.

Today is the birthday of our Rogator Lucius Rutilius Minervalis.
Felices natalis! Di Deaeque omnes dent tibi quae velis


To Tellus and Ceres

O Mothers of Fruitfulness, Tellus and Ceres, please,
With salted spelt cakes offered for Your mother's woe,
In kind service have Tellus and Ceres nurtured wheat,
She who gave grain life, She who gave us room to grow.

Pray then before the sheep are shorn their winter's fleece.

Consorts in labour who antiquity reformed,
Oaken acorn have You replaced by useful meal,
With boundless crops satisfy those who fields farmed,
O that they may by their tillage their reward seal.

May You grant tender seed abundant increase.

Let not icy cold enwrap our new shoots with snow,
While we sow let cloudless skies and fair winds blow.

When the seed lies sprouting, sprinkle with gentle rains,
May You ward off the feasting by birds from our grains.

You also, little ants, spare the grain we have sown,
More abundant will be your harvest when 'tis grown.
Meanwhile may our grain not blight by rough mildew,
Nor foul weather our seed blanch to a sickly hue.

Never may our grain be shriveled nor may it swell,
Without eye-stinging cockle, not by wild oats held.

Crops of wheat, of barley, of spelt grow on the farm,
Look now, Good Mothers, guard well the field,
The seasons change, the earth by Your breath grows warm,
With Your gentle touch may You increase our yield.

By Peace Ceres nursed, Her foster-child live in peace.

~ Ovid Fasti I.671-704


AUC 485 / 268 BCE: P. Sempronius Sophus dedicated a Temple to Tellus
in Carina.

On the Ides of December Rome held a lecisternium for Ceres carrying
an image of Her from Her temple on the Aventine to the temple of
Tellus in the district of Carina. An image of Tellus was likewise
drawn from Her temple. Both were placed side by side on a couch
before the doors of the aedes of Tellus, as though Ceres had come to
visit Her mother. In front of Their couch was set a table to
receive offerings. It was at such rare lecisternia that the general
populace were allowed to approach the Goddesses in awe. There are
only three festivals known where Tellus and Ceres were offered
sacrifices together. Besides the Ides of December, the other
festivals were the Paganalia of late January and the Fordicia of
April. The lecisternium of Tellus and Ceres is found at Praeneste,
from which comes a sculpture showing the Goddesses side by side on a
litter. This rite, and the dedication of a temple for Tellus on this
date at Rome, may relate to an earlier rustic ritual of no fixed
date. This was the Sementivae Telluris. Special priests called
Semones, found in the Sabine territory and in certain Latin towns,
ritually sowed grain at this time of year to ensure an abundant
harvest for the community. In the same way that Pliny relates a
farmer sowing rabbia, the Semones probably said a prayer similar
to "Hoc farrem mihi vico sereo." "I sow this grain for me and for my
neighbors (Plinius Secundus, Hist. Nat. 24.116)." It is probable
that at Praeneste the images of the Goddesses were carried out to the
fields for this ritual sowing. But by the time we hear of it, at
Rome, it had become a urban cultus.


AUC 354 / 399 BCE: The First Lectisternium

"Whether on account of the intemperate weather, or by the sudden
change from cold to heat, or by some other cause, the severe winter
was followed by a pestilence in summer, which proved fatal to men and
animals alike. As neither a cause nor a cure could be found for what
had come upon the city, the Senate ordered the Sibylline Books to be
consulted. The Duumviri priests who had charge of the oracles found
that a lectisternium should be performed for the first time in Rome.
For eight days Apollo and Latona, Diana and Hercules, Mercury and
Neptune were propitiated on three couches decked with the most
magnificent coverlets that could be obtained. Sacred celebrations
were also conducted in private houses. It is stated that throughout
the city the front gates of private houses were thrown open and
hospitality extended to all visitors, whether acquaintances or
strangers and men who had been enemies instead held friendly and
sociable conversations with each other and abstained from all
litigation. Even prisoners were allowed free during this period, and
it seemed afterwards as though an act of impiety that they should be
placed in chains once more." ~ Titus Livius 5.13.4-8

AUC 563 / 190 BCE: Founding of Romana Bononia (Bologna)

"On December 13th of this year the colony of Bononia was founded in
pursuance of a senatorial decree, the three commissioners being L.
Valerius Flaccus, M. Atilius Serranus and L. Valerius Tappo. The
colonists numbered 3000; the equites received each seventy jugera,
the other settlers fifty. The land had been taken from the Boii who
had themselves formerly expelled the Etruscans from it." ~ Titus
Livius 37.57


Our thought for today comes from Marcus Aurelius, Meditations 2.11.2:

"But in truth They do exist, and They do care for human concerns, and
They have put all the means in man's power to enable him not to fall
into real evils."
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 59911 From: Cn. Cornelius Lentulus Date: 2008-12-13
Subject: LAST REGULAR RITUAL: 10th Anniversary of Nova Roma - Sacred Year of
Cn. Cornelius Lentulus, pontifex, sacerdos Concordiae, sacerdos Pannoniae,
quaestor, legatus pro praetore: consulibus, praetoribus, tribunis
plebis, senatui populoque Novo Romano, Quiritibus: salutem plurimam:


Salvete, Quirites!

May the Divine Harmony shine upon you all brightly!



IT IS DONE.

I fulfilled my vow about this Sacred Anniversary Year of the Nova Roman Decennalia, as I promised on the last 12th December; it was exactly one year plus a day ago:

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma/message/53489

I vowed to pray and sacrifice to Concordia one every Kalends and Ides of the Sacred Year of 10th Anniversary. I followed my vow and I prayed to Concordia constantly on every Kalends and Ides.

Now I arrived to the last Ides of this year, so this is the last regular sacrifice of the 24 Ides and Kalends ceremonies that had started on this 1st January as the Opening Ceremony of the Sacred Year:

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma/message/54503

Besides the regular Kalends and Ides ceremonies, I conducted ceremonies on the two holidays of the Concordia Temples, and many, many public sacrifices throughout the whole year, in Pannnonia (Hungary), Dacia (Romania) and Bulgaria, among them the Herculanensia 10th Anniversary Holiday at the VI Conventus Novae Romae.

The most important of these, however, and one that I want to remain as an eternal Nova Roman holiday, was the Concordialia on the 1st of March, the Foundation Day of Nova Roma, decreted by the Senate to be an official holiday of Nova Roma.


SODALITAS CONCORDIALIS

I founded the Sodalitas Concordiae on the 1st of March, that will have the duty to continue my efforts to please Dea Concordia and make her to save us from flamewars, hate, discord, and allow us to be friends and comrades fighting for the same cause. The Sodalitas Concordiae, after the sacred Anniversary Year, will continue this mission making an emphasis on Concordia as a patron deity of Nova Roma, as a virtuous standard of behaviour and as the only way that can give unity, strength and cooperative development for our beloved republic.

Any citizen of Nova Roma who wish to be involved into a group that celebrates civil discussion, peace, openness, inclusiveness, friendship and concord, can join the Sodalitas Concordiae here:

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/NR_Concordia/


LAST REGULAR SACRIFICE AND CLOSING THE SACRED YEAR ON 31TH DECEMBER

The end of Concordia's Sacred Year is here, very soon, and this has been the last Idus. This my last regular Kalends and Ides sacrifice about our Tenth Anniversary. Nova Roma has been 10 years old: the last thing that remains to me is to celebrate the closing of the Tenth Anniversary Sacred year of concordia at the last day of this year.

Until that, this year is still 2761 AUC: the year of Goddess Concordance.

This ritual, like the previous one, is focused on the concordance and peace between cultores deorum and Christians. This is a conflict within Nova Roma that should end and be converted into peace and mutual understanding as soon as possible in order to achieve a real and sincere pax deorum.

This has been the ritual for the Ides of December.

Please, citizens of Nova Roma, concentrate now your prayers on the creative cooperation of the citizenry and successful development of Nova Roma!

Help me with your prayers to make more effective my sacrifice!

PLEASE SEND YOUR PRAYERS TO MY E-MAIL ADDRESS!

I especially ask our Magistrates and Senators: send me your prayers to
Concordia and I will allocate them in the Virtual Temple of Concordia of the Nova Roman People:

http://www.novaroma.org/nr/Aedes_Concordiae_Populi_Novi_Romani_%28Nova_Roma%29

Visit the Virtual Temple of Concordia and leave a personal, public prayer!

PLEASE SEND YOUR PRAYERS TO MY E-MAIL ADDRESS!

Today's sacrifice has been done before my home altar. I have worshiped
Concordia for the unity, peace, strengthen and harmony of the New Roman People and I have given Her wine and incense.
The ritual has been this:


+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

SACRIFICIUM CONCORDIAE IDIBUS DECEMBRIBUS ANNIVERSARII SACRI X NOVAE ROMAE CONDITAE



Favete linguis!

(Beginning of the sacrifice.)

PRAEFATIO

Dea Concordia,
Concordia Novae Romae,
Concordia Senatus Populique Novi Romani,
Concordia Populi Novi Romani Quiritium,
Concordia civium Novorum Romanorum,
Concordia deorum et mortalium,
Dea pacis et salutis et gloriae Populi Novi Romani Quiritium,
Dea caritatis et amicitiae et fraternitatis,
te hoc ture commovendo
bonas preces precor,
uti sies volens propitia
Populo Novo Romano Quiritibus,
mihi, domo, familiae!

(Incense is placed in the focus of the altar.)

Dea Concordia,
Concordia Novae Romae,
Concordia Senatus Populique Novi Romani,
Concordia Populi Novi Romani Quiritium,
Concordia civium Novorum Romanorum,
Concordia deorum et mortalium,
Dea pacis et salutis et gloriae Populi Novi Romani Quiritium,
Dea caritatis et amicitiae et fraternitatis,
uti te ture commovendo
bonas preces precatus sum,
eiusdem rei ergo
macte vino inferio esto!

(Libation of wine is made.)

PRECATIO

Dea Concordia,
Concordia Novae Romae,
Concordia Senatus Populique Novi Romani,
Concordia Populi Novi Romani Quiritium,
Concordia civium Novorum Romanorum,
Concordia deorum et mortalium,
Dea pacis et salutis et gloriae Populi Novi Romani Quiritium,
Dea caritatis et amicitiae et fraternitatis,
spes et victoria nostra sempiterna atque aeterna,
hisce Idibus Decembribus anniversarii decimi
annique undecimi Novae Romae conditae,
te precor, veneror, quaesoque obtestorque:
uti pacem concordiamque constantem
societati Novae Romae tribuas;
uti Christianos Novos Romanos et cultores deorum maiorum antiquorum
in pace amicitiaque et fraternitate coniungas,
utique Rem Publicam Populi Novi Romani Quiritium
confirmes, augeas, adiuves,
omnibusque discordiis liberes;
utique Res Publica Populi Novi Romani Quiritium semper floreat;
atque hoc anno anniversarii decimi Novae Romae conditae convalescat;
atque pax et concordia, salus et gloria Novae Romae omni tempore crescat,
utique Populo Novo Romano Quiritibus,
Reique Publicae Populi Novi Romani Quiritium,
mihi, domo, familiae
omnes in hoc anno undecimo Novae Romae eventus bonos faustosque esse siris;
utique sies volens propitia Populo Novo Romano Quiritibus,
Reique Publicae Populi Novi Romani Quiritium,
magistratibus, consulibus, praetoribus Populi Novi Romani Quiritium,
tribunis Plebis Novae Romanae,
Senatui Novo Romano,
omnibus civibus, viris et mulieribus, pueris et puellabus Novis Romanis,
mihi, domo, familiae!

SACRIFICIUM

Sicut verba nuncupavi,
quaeque ita faxis, uti ego me sentio dicere:
harum rerum ergo macte
hoc libo libando,
hoc vino libando,
hoc ture ommovendo
esto fito volens propitia
hoc anno anniversarii decimi Novae Romae conditae
Populo Novo Romano Quiritibus,
Reique Publicae Populi Novi Romani Quiritium,
magistratibus, consulibus, praetoribus Populi Novi Romani Quiritium,
tribunis Plebis Novae Romanae,
Senatui Novo Romano,
Christianis Novis Romanis et cultoribus deorum maiorum antiquorum,
omnibus civibus, viris et mulierbus, pueris et puellabus Novis Romanis,
mihi, domo, familiae!

(Libum is sacrificed, libation is made and incense is sacrificed.)

REDDITIO

Dea Concordia,
Concordia Novae Romae,
Concordia Senatus Populique Novi Romani,
Concordia Populi Novi Romani Quiritium,
Concordia civium Novorum Romanorum,
Concordia deorum et mortalium,
Dea pacis et salutis et gloriae Populi Novi Romani Quiritium,
Dea caritatis et amicitiae et fraternitatis,
uti te ture commovendo
et vino libando
bonas preces precatus sum,
earundem rerum ergo
macte vino inferio esto!

(Libation of wine is made)

Ilicet!

(End of the sacrifice.)

PIACULUM

Iane,
Concordia Populi Novi Romani Quiritium,
Iuppiter Optime Maxmime, Iuno, Minerva,
Omnes Di Immortales quocumque nomine:
si quidquam vobis in hac caerimonia displicet,
hoc vino inferio
veniam peto
et vitium meum expio.

(Libation of wine is made.)


VALETE SEMPER IN CONCORDIA!

VIVAT NOVA ROMA!

VIVAT NOVA ROMA ANNORUM X!


Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus,
Q U A E S T O R
P O N T I F E X
SACERDOS CONCORDIAE
------------------------------------------
Legatus Pro Praetore Provinciae Pannoniae
Sacerdos Provinciae Pannoniae
Interpres Linguae Hungaricae
Accensus Consulum T. Iulii Sabini et M. Moravii Piscini
Scriba Praetorum M. Curiatii Complutensis et M. Iulii Severi
Scriba Aedilis Curulis P. Memmii Albucii
Scriba Rogatoris Cn. Equitii Marini
Scriba Interpretis Linguae Latinae A. Tulliae Scholasticae
-------------------------------------------
Magister Sodalitatis Latinitatis
Dominus Factionis Russatae
Latinista, Classicus Philologus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 59912 From: Cn. Cornelius Lentulus Date: 2008-12-13
Subject: Sending your public prayers to Concordia
Cn. Lentulus pontifex, sacerdos Concordialis omnibus Quiritibus s. p. d.


I officially thank all citizens and foreigners who have sent their personal public prayers to Concordia for the cooperative and creative develepment and growth of the Nova Roman people and republic.

Thank you very much and may Concordia bless you:

Cn. Equitius Marinus Censorius rogator, senator (two prayers)
M. Hortensia Maior quaestrix, senatrix, flaminica
L. Vitellius Triarius quaestor
T. Popillia Laenas Pannonica
Decius Iunius Palladius Invictus senator
M. Valerius Traianus
Rebecca Melendez (peregrina)
C. Tullius Structus
M. Iulius Severus praetor, senator
C. Pompeius Marcellus
C. Marius Basilius
Gerard Dempsey (peregrinus)
M. Moravius Piscinus Horatianus consul, pontifex maximus, flamen, augur, senator
Annia Minucia Marcella legata pro praetore, senatrix

I invite you all to join the sodalitas of worshippers of Dea Concordia:

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/NR_Concordia/


CITIZENS! ESPECIALLY PRIESTS, MAGISTRATES AND SENATORS!


The Sacred 10th Anniversary Year is still ongoing, it is not finished until 31st December.

You still have time to join the group of these illustrous citizens whom I've listed above and to send a prayer to the "Virtual Temple Of The Quiritial Nova Roman People's Concordia":

http://novaroma.org/nr/Aedes_Concordiae_Populi_Novi_Romani_%28Nova_Roma%29

It is still time to join with your prayer and to add your name to the Virtual Temple's website. Nova Roma needs these prayers and we must please and placate Goddess Concordia in order to have a cooperative and peaceful society of strength, success and unity.

Send your prayers to my e-mail address and I place them to the Virtual Temple, among the official ceremonies' texts and prayers of our most illustrous leaders and citizens.

Help me with your prayers to make more effective my sacrifice!

PLEASE SEND YOUR PRAYERS TO MY E-MAIL ADDRESS!

I especially ask our Magistrates and Senators: send me your prayers to
Concordia and I will allocate them in the Virtual Temple of Concordia of the Nova Roman People:

http://www.novaroma .org/nr/Aedes_ Concordiae_ Populi_Novi_ Romani_%28Nova_ Roma%29

Visit the Virtual Temple of Concordia and leave a personal, public prayer!

PLEASE SEND YOUR PRAYERS TO MY E-MAIL ADDRESS!


VALETE IN CONCORDIA BEATISSIMA!


Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus,
Q U A E S T O R
P O N T I F E X
SACERDOS CONCORDIAE
------------------------------------------
Legatus Pro Praetore Provinciae Pannoniae
Sacerdos Provinciae Pannoniae
Interpres Linguae Hungaricae
Accensus Consulum T. Iulii Sabini et M. Moravii Piscini
Scriba Praetorum M. Curiatii Complutensis et M. Iulii Severi
Scriba Aedilis Curulis P. Memmii Albucii
Scriba Rogatoris Cn. Equitii Marini
Scriba Interpretis Linguae Latinae A. Tulliae Scholasticae
-------------------------------------------
Magister Sodalitatis Latinitatis
Dominus Factionis Russatae
Latinista, Classicus Philologus


Group: Nova-Roma Message: 59913 From: Robert Levee Date: 2008-12-13
Subject: Re: What are we?
Salve,

Considering some of your thoughts, makes me wonder why we do not promote the aquisition of land, such as thst in Texas and wonder how many of us crave to be a true micro nation.Just a thought.


--- On Fri, 12/12/08, Maxima Valeria Messallina <violetphearsen@...> wrote:

> From: Maxima Valeria Messallina <violetphearsen@...>
> Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] What are we?
> To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> Date: Friday, December 12, 2008, 10:24 PM
> And yours are very good thoughts. Please continue to share
> them with us.
>  
> Maxima Valeria Messallina
> Sacerdos Vestalis
>
>
> --- On Fri, 12/5/08, Stefn Ullerius Venator Piperbarbus
> <famila.ulleria.venii@...> wrote:
>
> From: Stefn Ullerius Venator Piperbarbus
> <famila.ulleria.venii@...>
> Subject: [Nova-Roma] What are we?
> To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> Date: Friday, December 5, 2008, 7:39 PM
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Salus et fortuna omnes;
>
> I know that the elections are still undecided as yet...but
> the
> strength of the Res Publica is in the People, not the
> officials.
>
> I have been a Cives Nova Romana since Quinctilis (July)
> MMDCCLI AUC
> so, I've seen all but the very beginning (only 77 men
> and women signed
> on before me).
>
> Our Res Publica IS, in some ways, a world spanning nation;
> just look
> at the number of time zones we cover.
>
> Our actual, taxpaying population, comprises a healthy group
> of state
> (USA) or provincial size.
>
> Our ambitions SHOULD be as big as the future is long.
>
> Our expectations should be as large as we are.
>
> Just a thought or two...
>
> ============ ========= ====
> In amicitia quod fides -
> Stephanus Ullerius Venator Piperbarbus
> Senator et Custos
> Civis, Patrician, Paterfamilias et Lictor
>
> Religio Septentrionalis - Poetus
>
> Dominus Sodalitas Coquuorum et Cerevisiae Coctorum
> http://groups. yahoo.com/ group/Sodalis_ Coq_et_Coq/
>
> http://www.myspace. com/venator_ poetus
> http://anheathenrea der.blogspot. com/
> http://ullarsskald0 1.Writing. Com/
> http://piparskeggrs kald.podbean. com/
> http://www.catamoun t-grange- hearth.org/
> http://www.cafepres s.com/catamountg range
> --
> May the Holy Powers smile on our efforts.
> May the Spirits of our family lines nod in approval.
> May we be of Worth to our fellow Nova Romans.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 59914 From: Robert Levee Date: 2008-12-13
Subject: Re: What are we?
Salve,

Considering some of your thoughts, makes me wonder why we do not promote the aquisition of land, such as thst in Texas and wonder how many of us crave to be a true micro nation.Just a thought.

Salve,
Ap.Galerius Aurelianus
Tribune


--- On Fri, 12/12/08, Maxima Valeria Messallina <violetphearsen@...> wrote:

> From: Maxima Valeria Messallina <violetphearsen@...>
> Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] What are we?
> To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> Date: Friday, December 12, 2008, 10:24 PM
> And yours are very good thoughts. Please continue to share
> them with us.
>  
> Maxima Valeria Messallina
> Sacerdos Vestalis
>
>
> --- On Fri, 12/5/08, Stefn Ullerius Venator Piperbarbus
> <famila.ulleria.venii@...> wrote:
>
> From: Stefn Ullerius Venator Piperbarbus
> <famila.ulleria.venii@...>
> Subject: [Nova-Roma] What are we?
> To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> Date: Friday, December 5, 2008, 7:39 PM
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Salus et fortuna omnes;
>
> I know that the elections are still undecided as yet...but
> the
> strength of the Res Publica is in the People, not the
> officials.
>
> I have been a Cives Nova Romana since Quinctilis (July)
> MMDCCLI AUC
> so, I've seen all but the very beginning (only 77 men
> and women signed
> on before me).
>
> Our Res Publica IS, in some ways, a world spanning nation;
> just look
> at the number of time zones we cover.
>
> Our actual, taxpaying population, comprises a healthy group
> of state
> (USA) or provincial size.
>
> Our ambitions SHOULD be as big as the future is long.
>
> Our expectations should be as large as we are.
>
> Just a thought or two...
>
> ============ ========= ====
> In amicitia quod fides -
> Stephanus Ullerius Venator Piperbarbus
> Senator et Custos
> Civis, Patrician, Paterfamilias et Lictor
>
> Religio Septentrionalis - Poetus
>
> Dominus Sodalitas Coquuorum et Cerevisiae Coctorum
> http://groups. yahoo.com/ group/Sodalis_ Coq_et_Coq/
>
> http://www.myspace. com/venator_ poetus
> http://anheathenrea der.blogspot. com/
> http://ullarsskald0 1.Writing. Com/
> http://piparskeggrs kald.podbean. com/
> http://www.catamoun t-grange- hearth.org/
> http://www.cafepres s.com/catamountg range
> --
> May the Holy Powers smile on our efforts.
> May the Spirits of our family lines nod in approval.
> May we be of Worth to our fellow Nova Romans.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 59915 From: Gnaeus Caelius Ahenobarbus Date: 2008-12-13
Subject: Re: What are we?
Cn. Caelius Ahenobarbus omnibus s.p.d.

    I am in the camp that dislikes the word "micronation" due to its connotations of a lack of seriousness. We are a corporation of people dedicated to restoring Roman values. If we had land, that land could be used for a center to do that, with temples, a "historical village", and even living quarters for those who wished to espouse those values through their lives whether part-time or full-time.
    Without at least one physical location like that, Nova Roma will remain a collection of mailing lists and people doing occasional events. If we have any hope of doing any more than that, we must become more focused and, yes, more serious. We should have land, regular religious rituals, classes for the general public, and many other things. This past year has seen Nova Roma and Novi Romani involved in some amazing events, and that is a great thing. Let us not lose the momentum that has been generated. Let us push forward with zeal and energy. Let us be Romans.

Optime valete!
 
--
Gnaeus Caelius Ahenobarbus
Aedilis Oppidi, Oppidum Fluminis Gilae, America Austroccidentalis
Accensus, cos. M. Moravius Piscinus Horatianus et T. Iulius Sabinus
http://becomingnewthroughtheold.blogspot.com



Group: Nova-Roma Message: 59916 From: Robert Levee Date: 2008-12-13
Subject: Re: What are we?
Ap.Galerius Gnaeus Ahenobarbus S.P.D.,

Very well said sir.Perhaps you could suggest some ways we could come up with some concrete plans to do just that.

Vale,
Ap.Galerius Aurelianus


--- On Sat, 12/13/08, Gnaeus Caelius Ahenobarbus <cn.caelius@...> wrote:

> From: Gnaeus Caelius Ahenobarbus <cn.caelius@...>
> Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] What are we?
> To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> Date: Saturday, December 13, 2008, 3:56 PM
> Cn. Caelius Ahenobarbus omnibus s.p.d.
>
> I am in the camp that dislikes the word
> "micronation" due to its connotations of a lack of
> seriousness. We are a corporation of people dedicated to
> restoring Roman values. If we had land, that land could be
> used for a center to do that, with temples, a
> "historical village", and even living quarters for
> those who wished to espouse those values through their lives
> whether part-time or full-time.
>
> Without at least one physical location like that, Nova
> Roma will remain a collection of mailing lists and people
> doing occasional events. If we have any hope of doing any
> more than that, we must become more focused and, yes, more
> serious. We should have land, regular religious rituals,
> classes for the general public, and many other things. This
> past year has seen Nova Roma and Novi Romani involved in
> some amazing events, and that is a great thing. Let us not
> lose the momentum that has been generated. Let us push
> forward with zeal and energy. Let us be Romans.
>
> Optime valete!
>
> --
> Gnaeus Caelius Ahenobarbus
> Aedilis Oppidi, Oppidum Fluminis Gilae, America
> Austroccidentalis
> Accensus, cos. M. Moravius Piscinus Horatianus et T. Iulius
> Sabinus
> http://becomingnewthroughtheold.blogspot.com
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 59917 From: Gnaeus Caelius Ahenobarbus Date: 2008-12-13
Subject: Re: What are we?
Cn. Caelius Ahenobarbus Ap. Galerio Aureliano omnibusque s.p.d.
 
    We must rent or buy land or another facility. Many things come to mind: a small church building in a city, a parcel of land just outside a city, or any number of other options. We could rent a small place and create a temple to the gods, similar to the way little Protestant Christian churches start up all the time. The land option, while giving us more freedom, may or may not be preferable. We could definitely do something with a little bit of land, say 5 to 10 acres. Such parcels are not hard to find, are not expensive, and can be bought via owner-financing in many cases. These things would take not only the physical aspects of money, time, and energy on the part of individual cives and the Republic, but may also involve abstract changes to how the organization itself functions so that such a physical property would be under the control of the appropriate parts of the organization.
    Nova Roma needs a full-time physical presence. That's pretty much all there is to it. Otherwise, we are an academic organization at best and a bunch of role players/fanatics/weirdos/Internet junkies at worst. I know we all want more than either of those things. We want Rome. Rome must be built.

Optime vale, et valete!
 
--
Gnaeus Caelius Ahenobarbus
Aedilis Oppidi, Oppidum Fluminis Gilae, America Austroccidentalis
Accensus, cos. M. Moravius Piscinus Horatianus et T. Iulius Sabinus
http://becomingnewthroughtheold.blogspot.com



From: Robert Levee <galerius_of_rome@...>
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Saturday, December 13, 2008 2:06:05 PM
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] What are we?

Ap.Galerius Gnaeus Ahenobarbus S.P.D.,

Very well said sir.Perhaps you could suggest some ways we could come up with some concrete plans to do just that.

Vale,
Ap.Galerius Aurelianus

--- On Sat, 12/13/08, Gnaeus Caelius Ahenobarbus <cn.caelius@yahoo. com> wrote:

> From: Gnaeus Caelius Ahenobarbus <cn.caelius@yahoo. com>
> Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] What are we?
> To: Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com
> Date: Saturday, December 13, 2008, 3:56 PM
> Cn. Caelius Ahenobarbus omnibus s.p.d.
>
> I am in the camp that dislikes the word
> "micronation" due to its connotations of a lack of
> seriousness. We are a corporation of people dedicated to
> restoring Roman values. If we had land, that land could be
> used for a center to do that, with temples, a
> "historical village", and even living quarters for
> those who wished to espouse those values through their lives
> whether part-time or full-time.
>
> Without at least one physical location like that, Nova
> Roma will remain a collection of mailing lists and people
> doing occasional events. If we have any hope of doing any
> more than that, we must become more focused and, yes, more
> serious. We should have land, regular religious rituals,
> classes for the general public, and many other things. This
> past year has seen Nova Roma and Novi Romani involved in
> some amazing events, and that is a great thing. Let us not
> lose the momentum that has been generated. Let us push
> forward with zeal and energy. Let us be Romans.
>
> Optime valete!
>
> --
> Gnaeus Caelius Ahenobarbus
> Aedilis Oppidi, Oppidum Fluminis Gilae, America
> Austroccidentalis
> Accensus, cos. M. Moravius Piscinus Horatianus et T. Iulius
> Sabinus
> http://becomingnewt hroughtheold. blogspot. com


Group: Nova-Roma Message: 59918 From: Robert Levee Date: 2008-12-13
Subject: Re: What are we?
Ap.Galerius Gnaeus Caelius Ahenobarbus S.P.D.

Great ideas.I remember a time many years ago, when I had a piece of land.Five acres it was all forest.A number of clearings would have been ideal sites, for alters to different dieties.Buildings could have been buit as well, with the utmost privacy.Of course where to purchase would be raised.There are a few very active provinces here in America.

Anyway one idea might be to start a solidatis, for this express purpose and attach a paypal, for donations to begin with.I would really like to help develop this idea further and hope you will help.

Vale Omnes
Ap.Galerius Aurelianus


--- On Sat, 12/13/08, Gnaeus Caelius Ahenobarbus <cn.caelius@...> wrote:

> From: Gnaeus Caelius Ahenobarbus <cn.caelius@...>
> Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] What are we?
> To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> Date: Saturday, December 13, 2008, 4:14 PM
> Cn. Caelius Ahenobarbus Ap. Galerio Aureliano omnibusque
> s.p.d.
>
>
> We must rent or buy land or another facility. Many
> things come to mind: a small church building in a city, a
> parcel of land just outside a city, or any number of other
> options. We could rent a small place and create a temple to
> the gods, similar to the way little Protestant Christian
> churches start up all the time. The land option, while
> giving us more freedom, may or may not be preferable. We
> could definitely do something with a little bit of land, say
> 5 to 10 acres. Such parcels are not hard to find, are not
> expensive, and can be bought via owner-financing in many
> cases. These things would take not only the physical aspects
> of money, time, and energy on the part of individual cives
> and the Republic, but may also involve abstract changes to
> how the organization itself functions so that such a
> physical property would be under the control of the
> appropriate parts of the organization.
> Nova Roma needs a full-time physical presence.
> That's pretty much all there is to it. Otherwise, we are
> an academic organization at best and a bunch of role
> players/fanatics/weirdos/Internet junkies at worst. I know
> we all want more than either of those things. We want Rome.
> Rome must be built.
>
> Optime vale, et valete!
>
> --
> Gnaeus Caelius Ahenobarbus
> Aedilis Oppidi, Oppidum Fluminis Gilae, America
> Austroccidentalis
> Accensus, cos. M. Moravius Piscinus Horatianus et T. Iulius
> Sabinus
> http://becomingnewthroughtheold.blogspot.com
>
>
>
>
> ________________________________
> From: Robert Levee <galerius_of_rome@...>
> To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Saturday, December 13, 2008 2:06:05 PM
> Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] What are we?
>
>
> Ap.Galerius Gnaeus Ahenobarbus S.P.D.,
>
> Very well said sir.Perhaps you could suggest some ways we
> could come up with some concrete plans to do just that.
>
> Vale,
> Ap.Galerius Aurelianus
>
> --- On Sat, 12/13/08, Gnaeus Caelius Ahenobarbus
> <cn.caelius@yahoo. com> wrote:
>
> > From: Gnaeus Caelius Ahenobarbus <cn.caelius@yahoo.
> com>
> > Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] What are we?
> > To: Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com
> > Date: Saturday, December 13, 2008, 3:56 PM
> > Cn. Caelius Ahenobarbus omnibus s.p.d.
> >
> > I am in the camp that dislikes the word
> > "micronation" due to its connotations of a
> lack of
> > seriousness. We are a corporation of people dedicated
> to
> > restoring Roman values. If we had land, that land
> could be
> > used for a center to do that, with temples, a
> > "historical village", and even living
> quarters for
> > those who wished to espouse those values through their
> lives
> > whether part-time or full-time.
> >
> > Without at least one physical location like that,
> Nova
> > Roma will remain a collection of mailing lists and
> people
> > doing occasional events. If we have any hope of doing
> any
> > more than that, we must become more focused and, yes,
> more
> > serious. We should have land, regular religious
> rituals,
> > classes for the general public, and many other things.
> This
> > past year has seen Nova Roma and Novi Romani involved
> in
> > some amazing events, and that is a great thing. Let us
> not
> > lose the momentum that has been generated. Let us push
> > forward with zeal and energy. Let us be Romans.
> >
> > Optime valete!
> >
> > --
> > Gnaeus Caelius Ahenobarbus
> > Aedilis Oppidi, Oppidum Fluminis Gilae, America
> > Austroccidentalis
> > Accensus, cos. M. Moravius Piscinus Horatianus et T.
> Iulius
> > Sabinus
> > http://becomingnewt hroughtheold. blogspot. com
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 59919 From: Stefn Ullerius Venator Piperbarbus Date: 2008-12-13
Subject: Challenge
Avete Omnes;

I am, this day, sending one day's wages (US$ 110.00 before taxes) to
the Nova Roma treasury as a beginning to a Land Fund.

Can the other Cives do the same?

Although Nova Roma is a "US" phenomena; I will support a land purchase anywhere.

=========================================
In amicitia quod fides -
Stephanus Ullerius Venator Piperbarbus
Senator et Custode
Civis, Patrician, Paterfamilias et Lictor

Religio Septentrionalis - Poetus

Dominus Sodalitas Coquuorum et Cerevisiae Coctorum
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Sodalis_Coq_et_Coq/

http://www.myspace.com/venator_poetus
http://anheathenreader.blogspot.com/
http://ullarsskald01.Writing.Com/
http://www.catamount-grange-hearth.org/
http://www.cafepress.com/catamountgrange
--
May the Holy Powers smile on our efforts.
May the Spirits of our family lines nod in approval.
May we be of Worth to our fellow Nova Romans.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 59920 From: Steve Moore Date: 2008-12-13
Subject: Re: What are we?
M. Valerius Potitus Ap. Galerio Aureliano Cn. Caelio Ahenobarbo SPD.

I totally agree with my amice, Caelius. Nova Roma needs local chapters
(oppida) and more face-to-face time.

I believe it should be the responsibility of all provincial governors
to establish oppida in their areas. Regular monthly meetings should be
held. New citizens should have to resources to contact and join these
oppida. All these things do not cost anything but time and initiative.

From these local chapters will come our future magistrates. The local
chapters will work out (in the real world) what it means to be a
Roman: the practice of the virtues (civic and personal), worship of
the Gods, auguries, Latin, the military, clothing, etc.

I think our goal for 2762 should be to have at least one
up-and-running oppidum in every province.

Valete.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 59921 From: Gnaeus Caelius Ahenobarbus Date: 2008-12-13
Subject: Re: Challenge
Cn. Caelius Ahenobarbus St. Ullerio Venatori Piperbarbo omnibusque s.p.d.

    This is an excellent idea! I will contribute some, as well, but it will be next month. If everyone did this, the land fund would reach thousands of dollars very quickly. With that resource at our disposal, we could start down the road to a full-time, real-world presence.
    My greatest respect and admiration to you! You are a true Roman!
 
--
Gnaeus Caelius Ahenobarbus
Aedilis Oppidi, Oppidum Fluminis Gilae, America Austroccidentalis
Accensus, cos. M. Moravius Piscinus Horatianus et T. Iulius Sabinus
http://becomingnewthroughtheold.blogspot.com



From: Stefn Ullerius Venator Piperbarbus <famila.ulleria.venii@...>
To: NR-Main List <Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Saturday, December 13, 2008 5:41:25 PM
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Challenge

Avete Omnes;

I am, this day, sending one day's wages (US$ 110.00 before taxes) to
the Nova Roma treasury as a beginning to a Land Fund.

Can the other Cives do the same?

Although Nova Roma is a "US" phenomena; I will support a land purchase anywhere.

============ ========= ========= ========= ==
In amicitia quod fides -
Stephanus Ullerius Venator Piperbarbus
Senator et Custode
Civis, Patrician, Paterfamilias et Lictor

Religio Septentrionalis - Poetus

Dominus Sodalitas Coquuorum et Cerevisiae Coctorum
http://groups. yahoo.com/ group/Sodalis_ Coq_et_Coq/

http://www.myspace. com/venator_ poetus
http://anheathenrea der.blogspot. com/
http://ullarsskald0 1.Writing. Com/
http://www.catamoun t-grange- hearth.org/
http://www.cafepres s.com/catamountg range
--
May the Holy Powers smile on our efforts.
May the Spirits of our family lines nod in approval.
May we be of Worth to our fellow Nova Romans.


Group: Nova-Roma Message: 59922 From: Robert Levee Date: 2008-12-13
Subject: Re: Challenge
Ap.Galerius Aurelianus Stefen Ullerius Venator Piperbus S.P.D.

Salve,

What a generous challenge you have set before us.I shall follow your lead as well and donate at the first of next month when I recieve my retirement.I am glad to see this string has become so productive.We must get the word out to all concerned in the respublica.You are a true Roman.

Vale,
For The Gods!
Ap.Galerius Aurelianus


--- On Sat, 12/13/08, Stefn Ullerius Venator Piperbarbus <famila.ulleria.venii@...> wrote:

> From: Stefn Ullerius Venator Piperbarbus <famila.ulleria.venii@...>
> Subject: [Nova-Roma] Challenge
> To: "NR-Main List" <Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com>
> Date: Saturday, December 13, 2008, 7:41 PM
> Avete Omnes;
>
> I am, this day, sending one day's wages (US$ 110.00
> before taxes) to
> the Nova Roma treasury as a beginning to a Land Fund.
>
> Can the other Cives do the same?
>
> Although Nova Roma is a "US" phenomena; I will
> support a land purchase anywhere.
>
> =========================================
> In amicitia quod fides -
> Stephanus Ullerius Venator Piperbarbus
> Senator et Custode
> Civis, Patrician, Paterfamilias et Lictor
>
> Religio Septentrionalis - Poetus
>
> Dominus Sodalitas Coquuorum et Cerevisiae Coctorum
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Sodalis_Coq_et_Coq/
>
> http://www.myspace.com/venator_poetus
> http://anheathenreader.blogspot.com/
> http://ullarsskald01.Writing.Com/
> http://www.catamount-grange-hearth.org/
> http://www.cafepress.com/catamountgrange
> --
> May the Holy Powers smile on our efforts.
> May the Spirits of our family lines nod in approval.
> May we be of Worth to our fellow Nova Romans.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 59923 From: Gaius Petronius Dexter Date: 2008-12-14
Subject: Today in Rome: Dec 14, 2008.
C. Petronius Dexter omnibus Quiritibus s.p.d.,
 
Today in Rome :
 
(Julian day : 2 454 815).
 
A. d. XIX Kalendas Ianuarias
MMDCCLXII anno Vrbis conditae.
Coss. M. Moravio T. Iulio.
 
Day of the week : Solis dies (Sunday).
 
Lunaris dies: XVIII.
Nundinal letter : D.
 
Hora ortus Solis : 07:29.
Hora occasus Solis : 16:39.
Temp. Min. : 8° C.
Temp. Max. : 14° C.
Wind on Rome : 40 Km/h.
Humidity: 72%.
Weather: Few showers. Clouds. Cool.
 
Horae diei :
 
I: 07:29 - 08:14 Mercurii hora.
II: 08:14 - 08:59 Lunae hora.
III: 08:59 - 09:44 Saturni hora.
IV: 09:44 - 10:29 Iovis hora.
V: 10:29 - 11:14 Martis hora.
VI: 11:14 - 12:00 Solis hora.
VII: 12:00 - 12:46 Veneris hora.
VIII: 12:46 - 13:33 Mercurii hora.
IX: 13:33 - 14:19 Lunae hora.
X: 14:19 - 15:06 Saturni hora.
XI: 15:06 - 15:52 Iovis hora.
XII: 15:52 - 16:39 Martis hora.
 

Horae noctis :
 
I: 16:39 - 17:52 Solis hora.
II: 17:52 - 19:06 Veneris hora.
III: 19:06 - 20:19 Mercurii hora.
IV: 20:19 - 21:33 Lunae hora.
V: 21:33 - 22:46 Saturni hora.
VI: 22:46 - 00:00 Iovis hora.
VII: 00:00 - 01:15 Martis hora.
VIII: 01:15 - 02:30 Solis hora.
IX: 02:30 - 03:45 Veneris hora.
X: 03:45 - 05:00 Mercurii hora.
XI: 05:00 - 06:15 Lunae hora.
XII: 06:15 - 07:30 Saturni hora.
 

Valete.
 
C. Petronius Dexter.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 59924 From: Q. Caecilius Metellus Date: 2008-12-14
Subject: (no subject)
Q Caecilius Metellus SPQR salutem dicit.

Saluete, Quirites.

With the Collegium Pontificum having finished its most recent session, I
announce the issuance of the Uisum Pontificum de Membrorum Terminis,
amendments to the composition of the Comitia Curiata, and one appointment. I
thank those members of the Collegium who presented their opinions on the
matters discussed, and I pray that these measures will bring us closer to
restoring the pax Deorum.

Ualete Bene,

Quintus Caecilius Metellus Postumianus
Pontifex

====

=VISVM PONTIFICVM DE MEMBRORVM TERMINIS=

QVOD BONVM FAVSTVM FELIX FORTVNATVM SIT

Pontifices Novae Romae, officiis nostris agendis per legem constitutiuam, ad
Senatum Consulesque designatos uidemus:

quin officia nostra agiamus, lex constitutiua Collegium inhibet, ut per pacem
deorum restituendam non potest Collegium de collegiorum membris et numeris
sacrorum decernere.

statum uisum, pontifices Senatui Consulibusque petamus statum corregendum.

=DECRETVM PONTIFICVM DE LICTORIBVS CVRIATIS=

QVOD BONVM FAVSTVM FELIX FORTVNATVM SIT

Collegio Pontificum per legem constitutiuam designare lictores comitiorum
curiatorum potente, de lictoribus curiatis Collegium designat:

Marcus Bianchius Antonius, Gnaeus Salvius Astur, Gaius Geminus Germanus,
Lucius Equitius Cincinnatus, Titus Labienus Fortunatus, Lucius Fabius
Metellus, Marcus Cornelius Felix, et Marcus Cassius Iulianus lictores ex
comitiis remouentur.

Titus Arminius Genialis, Gnaeus Caelius Ahenobarbus, Caius Curius Saturninus,
Paulla Corva Gaudialis, Caeso Fabius Buteo Quintilianus, Marca Hortensia
Maior, Lucia Livia Plauta, Annia Minucia Marcella, Arnamentia Moravia Aurelia,
Lucius Salix Cicero, Julilla Sempronia Magna, Gaius Tullius Valerianus
Germanicus, et Gaius Vipsanius Agrippa lictores ad comitia addiuntur.

=DECRETVM PONTIFICVM PONTIFICIS MINORIS DESIGNANDO=

QVOD BONVM FAVSTVM FELIX FORTVNATVM SIT

Collegio Pontificum per prius decretum in toto pontifices minores tres
designare potente, Caius Tullius Valerianus Germanicus pontifex minor a
Collegio designatur.

==

=An Observation of the Pontiffs on the Limitations of Members=

The Pontiffs of Nova Roma, in executing our duties under the Constitution,
make the following observation to the Senate and the Consules designati:

From executing our duties, the Constitution inhibits the Collegium,
such that in restoring the pax Deorum the Collegium is not able to make
decisions regarding the members and numbers thereof of the sacred colleges.

With this situation observed, we pontifices ask of the Senate and the Consuls
for the correction of this situation.

=A Decree of the Pontiffs on the Curiate Lictors=

Whereas the Collegium Pontificum is empowered by the Constitution to designate
the lictors of the Comitia Curiata, regarding the lictores curiati the
Collegium designates thus:

Marcus Bianchius Antonius, Gnaeus Salvius Astur, Gaius Geminus Germanus,
Lucius Equitius Cincinnatus, Titus Labienus Fortunatus, Lucius Fabius
Metellus, Marcus Cornelius Felix, and Marcus Cassius Iulianus are removed as
lictores from the comitia.

Titus Arminius Genialis, Gnaeus Caelius Ahenobarbus, Caius Curius Saturninus,
Paulla Corva Gaudialis, Caeso Fabius Buteo Quintilianus, Marca Hortensia
Maior, Lucia Livia Plauta, Annia Minucia Marcella, Arnamentia Moravia Aurelia,
Lucius Salix Cicero, Julilla Sempronia Magna, Gaius Tullius Valerianus
Germanicus, and Gaius Vipsanius Agrippa are added as lictores to the comitia.

=A Decree of the Pontiffs on the Designation of a Pontifex Minor=

Whereas the Collegium Pontificum is empowered by a previous decree to
designate a total of three pontiffs minor, C Tullius Valerianus Germanicus is
designated by the Collegium as pontifex minor.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 59925 From: Q. Caecilius Metellus Date: 2008-12-14
Subject: Acta Pontificum, Id. Oct. MMDCCLXI
[My apologies for missing the subject line the first time around. Just
another sign that we're working to get things done quickly!]

Q Caecilius Metellus SPQR salutem dicit.

Saluete, Quirites.

With the Collegium Pontificum having finished its most recent session, I
announce the issuance of the Uisum Pontificum de Membrorum Terminis,
amendments to the composition of the Comitia Curiata, and one appointment. I
thank those members of the Collegium who presented their opinions on the
matters discussed, and I pray that these measures will bring us closer to
restoring the pax Deorum.

Ualete Bene,

Quintus Caecilius Metellus Postumianus
Pontifex

====

=VISVM PONTIFICVM DE MEMBRORVM TERMINIS=

QVOD BONVM FAVSTVM FELIX FORTVNATVM SIT

Pontifices Novae Romae, officiis nostris agendis per legem constitutiuam, ad
Senatum Consulesque designatos uidemus:

quin officia nostra agiamus, lex constitutiua Collegium inhibet, ut per pacem
deorum restituendam non potest Collegium de collegiorum membris et numeris
sacrorum decernere.

statum uisum, pontifices Senatui Consulibusque petamus statum corregendum.

=DECRETVM PONTIFICVM DE LICTORIBVS CVRIATIS=

QVOD BONVM FAVSTVM FELIX FORTVNATVM SIT

Collegio Pontificum per legem constitutiuam designare lictores comitiorum
curiatorum potente, de lictoribus curiatis Collegium designat:

Marcus Bianchius Antonius, Gnaeus Salvius Astur, Gaius Geminus Germanus,
Lucius Equitius Cincinnatus, Titus Labienus Fortunatus, Lucius Fabius
Metellus, Marcus Cornelius Felix, et Marcus Cassius Iulianus lictores ex
comitiis remouentur.

Titus Arminius Genialis, Gnaeus Caelius Ahenobarbus, Caius Curius Saturninus,
Paulla Corva Gaudialis, Caeso Fabius Buteo Quintilianus, Marca Hortensia
Maior, Lucia Livia Plauta, Annia Minucia Marcella, Arnamentia Moravia Aurelia,
Lucius Salix Cicero, Julilla Sempronia Magna, Gaius Tullius Valerianus
Germanicus, et Gaius Vipsanius Agrippa lictores ad comitia addiuntur.

=DECRETVM PONTIFICVM PONTIFICIS MINORIS DESIGNANDO=

QVOD BONVM FAVSTVM FELIX FORTVNATVM SIT

Collegio Pontificum per prius decretum in toto pontifices minores tres
designare potente, Caius Tullius Valerianus Germanicus pontifex minor a
Collegio designatur.

==

=An Observation of the Pontiffs on the Limitations of Members=

The Pontiffs of Nova Roma, in executing our duties under the Constitution,
make the following observation to the Senate and the Consules designati:

From executing our duties, the Constitution inhibits the Collegium, such that
in restoring the pax Deorum the Collegium is not able to make decisions
regarding the members and numbers thereof of the sacred colleges.

With this situation observed, we pontifices ask of the Senate and the Consuls
for the correction of this situation.

=A Decree of the Pontiffs on the Curiate Lictors=

Whereas the Collegium Pontificum is empowered by the Constitution to designate
the lictors of the Comitia Curiata, regarding the lictores curiati the
Collegium designates thus:

Marcus Bianchius Antonius, Gnaeus Salvius Astur, Gaius Geminus Germanus,
Lucius Equitius Cincinnatus, Titus Labienus Fortunatus, Lucius Fabius
Metellus, Marcus Cornelius Felix, and Marcus Cassius Iulianus are removed as
lictores from the comitia.

Titus Arminius Genialis, Gnaeus Caelius Ahenobarbus, Caius Curius Saturninus,
Paulla Corva Gaudialis, Caeso Fabius Buteo Quintilianus, Marca Hortensia
Maior, Lucia Livia Plauta, Annia Minucia Marcella, Arnamentia Moravia Aurelia,
Lucius Salix Cicero, Julilla Sempronia Magna, Gaius Tullius Valerianus
Germanicus, and Gaius Vipsanius Agrippa are added as lictores to the comitia.

=A Decree of the Pontiffs on the Designation of a Pontifex Minor=

Whereas the Collegium Pontificum is empowered by a previous decree to
designate a total of three pontiffs minor, C Tullius Valerianus Germanicus is
designated by the Collegium as pontifex minor.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 59926 From: Q. Caecilius Metellus Date: 2008-12-14
Subject: A Legal Commentary on the Status of Uisa
Q Caecilius Metellus Quiritibus salutem dicit.

Saluete, Quirites.

(And at least I remembered the subject line this time!)

I thought it might be good of me, as the convening pontiff, to give a bit of
an explanation on what, really, a visum (or uisum, as I prefer) is, its
status, and why and how it's used. So I hope that my commentary below is
helpful, and if I'm anything less than crystal clear anywhere in it, please
don't hesitate to let me know, and I'll be glad to clarify. That's part of my
job, isn't it? Or did I miss another memo?

So, let me begin by stating what a uisum is. As you may note from my original
announcement, in the English version, I posted it as "Observation", which I
chose because the word best captures what 'uisum' means. A uisum is very
similar to a responsum, in that it has no legal force, but where a responsum
is a response to an inquiry from outside the issuing authority, a uisum
originates from the issuing authority, not having been prompted to answer
something brought to it. One could look at it in such a way that, if an
"outsider" (let's say, the Senate) recongised a problem, and referred the
matter to the Collegium Augurum for information on how to handle the problem,
then the augurs would collectively issue a responsum. But if the augurs
recognised the situation, and wanted to tell the Senate, "Hey, you, old guys,
handle it this way...", then a uisum would be issued. (I probably shouldn't
call them 'old guys'; I have a brother older than at least a third of the
senators.)

Next, the status of uisa. As I put into the preceding paragraph, uisa
currently have no legal force (nor should they). Uisa are observations of a
College (or, in some cases, individual members), directed toward other bodies,
when the issuer recognises a situation on which the issuer itself is unable to
act. To refer back to my previous example with respect to responsa, in that
case, the Senate had the ability to act, but asked the augurs for information
on how to act. And had the augurs recognised it first, their uisum would be
directed to the Senate. That, I think, actually explains its method of use
too. But onto the reasoning behind it!

Why are uisa issued? Well, as we all know (and sometimes hate), history
repeats itself. And when it does, it can save a little trouble when there's
already a uisum (or a responsum, for that matter) that has been issued.
Rather than having to pull sources all over again, either party might simply
look back on the earlier precedent, and drive straight from that (assuming
they're licensed for it).

So that's about the gist of uisa and responsa. Again, I hope it helps explain
things. And if not, well, um... don't know what to tell you. (No, not
really. I know what to tell you, but you might not like it. (No, really, I'm
not that mean. My sense of humour's a little off though. But if you have any
questions, send me a message, and I'll be glad to answer.))

Ualete Optime,

Quintus Caecilius Metellus Postumianus
Pontifex
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 59927 From: Q. Valerius Poplicola Date: 2008-12-14
Subject: Re: Challenge
Q. Valerius Poplicola omnibus S. P. D.

I simply am unable to pay that much, but if I get a good enough stipend for grad school this year I'm positive I can donate. However, a person in my shoes wouldn't be expected to divvy out anything even in ancient Rome! Someone should be funding my academic pursuits first, then when I am a success I'll pay a good wholesome amount.

Personally I'd like to see a committee formed to recreate ancient Italy in some way over in Italy, or perhaps a realistic frontier in England or perhaps Gaul. Something authentic and not touristy, and preferably actually over there, though I'm not too adverse to seeing something in the States either.

Di uos incolumes custodiant, ualete!

On Sat, Dec 13, 2008 at 7:55 PM, Robert Levee <galerius_of_rome@...> wrote:

Ap.Galerius Aurelianus Stefen Ullerius Venator Piperbus S.P.D.

Salve,

What a generous challenge you have set before us.I shall follow your lead as well and donate at the first of next month when I recieve my retirement.I am glad to see this string has become so productive.We must get the word out to all concerned in the respublica.You are a true Roman.

Vale,
For The Gods!
Ap.Galerius Aurelianus



--- On Sat, 12/13/08, Stefn Ullerius Venator Piperbarbus <famila.ulleria.venii@...> wrote:

> From: Stefn Ullerius Venator Piperbarbus <famila.ulleria.venii@...>
> Subject: [Nova-Roma] Challenge

> To: "NR-Main List" <Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com>
> Date: Saturday, December 13, 2008, 7:41 PM

> Avete Omnes;
>
> I am, this day, sending one day's wages (US$ 110.00
> before taxes) to
> the Nova Roma treasury as a beginning to a Land Fund.
>
> Can the other Cives do the same?
>
> Although Nova Roma is a "US" phenomena; I will
> support a land purchase anywhere.
>
> =========================================
> In amicitia quod fides -
> Stephanus Ullerius Venator Piperbarbus
> Senator et Custode
> Civis, Patrician, Paterfamilias et Lictor
>
> Religio Septentrionalis - Poetus
>
> Dominus Sodalitas Coquuorum et Cerevisiae Coctorum
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Sodalis_Coq_et_Coq/
>
> http://www.myspace.com/venator_poetus
> http://anheathenreader.blogspot.com/
> http://ullarsskald01.Writing.Com/
> http://www.catamount-grange-hearth.org/
> http://www.cafepress.com/catamountgrange
> --
> May the Holy Powers smile on our efforts.
> May the Spirits of our family lines nod in approval.
> May we be of Worth to our fellow Nova Romans.


Group: Nova-Roma Message: 59928 From: Q. Valerius Poplicola Date: 2008-12-14
Subject: Re: What are we?
Q. Valerius Poplicola omnibus sal.

I believe we're doing something like that here. As of January 1, the governor of Austrorientalis will also be a tribunus plebis, and both ciues of Memphis will be magistrates, one (Laenas) censor and the other (myself) quaestor.

Local temples/farmland would also be ideal.

On Sat, Dec 13, 2008 at 6:44 PM, Steve Moore <astrobear@...> wrote:

M. Valerius Potitus Ap. Galerio Aureliano Cn. Caelio Ahenobarbo SPD.

I totally agree with my amice, Caelius. Nova Roma needs local chapters
(oppida) and more face-to-face time.

I believe it should be the responsibility of all provincial governors
to establish oppida in their areas. Regular monthly meetings should be
held. New citizens should have to resources to contact and join these
oppida. All these things do not cost anything but time and initiative.

From these local chapters will come our future magistrates. The local
chapters will work out (in the real world) what it means to be a
Roman: the practice of the virtues (civic and personal), worship of
the Gods, auguries, Latin, the military, clothing, etc.

I think our goal for 2762 should be to have at least one
up-and-running oppidum in every province.

Valete.


Group: Nova-Roma Message: 59929 From: marcushoratius Date: 2008-12-14
Subject: a. d. XIX Kalendas Ianuaris: The Nine Muses
M. Moravius Piscinus Horatianus Quiritibus et omnibus salutem
plurimam dicit: Diis bene iuvantibus simus.

Hodie est ante diem XIX Kalendas Ianuaris; haec dies fastus aterque
est:

"By several days will bad and wintry weather often precede the proper
date to begin that season, as the Greeks say, 'to be an early
winter'." ~ C. Plinius Secundus, Historia Naturalis 18.57).


The Nine Muses, by Florus

Clio records past ages in her prose.
Euterpe's hollow reed makes double sound.
Voice-famed Thalia revelling loves the soccus.
Melpomene's notes in tragic iambs seethe.
Terpsichore's golden lyre thrills all the sky.
Strings touched by Erato sweet love-songs make.
Polymnia sways her body in easy and in varied movements.
Urania scans the stars of heaven in verse.
Calliope crowns epic bards with bays.


AUC 389 / 364 BCE: Third Lectisterium and the Introduction of Games

"Now let me recall from the beginning the reason why games were
instituted. In the Consulship of C. Sulpicius Peticus and C.
Licinius Stolo a pestilence broke out with insupportable violence,
calling our community away from military activities and crushing it
with care for an internal mischief. And now it appeared that more
help was to be found in a carefully chosen new religious practice
than in any human device. So that people, who hitherto had been
content with the circus show first put on by Romulus under the name
of Consualia after the rape of the Sabine virgins, now lent vacant
ears to poems composed to placate celestial power. But as it is the
way of mankind to follow up small beginnings with zealous
persistence, the young men added to the worshipping words addressed
to the Gods playful gestures with rude and clumsy body movements, and
that gave rise to the summoning of a dancer from Etruria. His
graceful agility, after the ancient manner of Curetes and Lydians
from whom the Tuscans drew their origin, charmed the eyes of Romans
with its welcome novelty; and because a dancer was called 'ister' in
Etrurian, the name of 'historiones' was given to actors. Gradually
the mimic art made its slow way to the rhythm of saturae, from which
the poet Livius (Andronicus) was the first to draw the minds of
spectators to the themes of plays. He acted his own work and being
frequently recalled by the audience made his voice hoarse, so he
brought a boy and a flute player to make music while he silently went
through the miming. Atellans were introduced from the Oscans. That
form of entertainment was tempered with Italian austerity and so it
is free from censure, the actor being neither expelled from his tribe
nor repulsed from military service." ~ Valerius Maximus 2.4.1-4


"Grant me the strength, Goddess, to whom I ask, to whom I pray;
extend your assistance to me." ~ Livius Andronicus, fr. Equos Troianos

Da mihi hasce opes, quas peto, quas precor porrige opitula


Our thought for today is from Epictetus, Enchiridion 48:

"The condition and characteristic of a vulgar person is that he never
looks for either help or harm from himself, but only from externals.
The condition and characteristic of a philosopher is that he looks to
himself for all help or harm. The marks of a proficient are that he
censures no one, praises no one, blames no one, accuses no one; says
nothing concerning himself as being anybody, or knowing anything.
When he is in any instance hindered or restrained, he accuses
himself; and if he is praised, he smiles to himself at the person who
praises him; and if he is censured, he makes no defense. But he goes
about with the caution of a convalescent, careful of interference
with anything that is doing well, but not yet quite secure. He
restrains desire; he transfers his aversion to those things only
which thwart the proper use of our own will; he employs his energies
moderately in all directions; if he appears stupid or ignorant, he
does not care; and, in a word, he keeps watch over himself as over an
enemy and one in ambush."
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 59930 From: philippe cardon Date: 2008-12-14
Subject: Re: Challenge

i will sent 100€ for the nexte anniversary of Roma in april
 
if some want to help me i have the project to create a center here in gaul
we can buy a old farm with land and built temple therms and circus or amphitheater
 
i have already the place i will wait for money we need so o 150 OOO€ that is 200 000$
 
naturralyy that is for NR
varro
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Sunday, December 14, 2008 6:58 AM
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Challenge

Q. Valerius Poplicola omnibus S. P. D.

I simply am unable to pay that much, but if I get a good enough stipend for grad school this year I'm positive I can donate. However, a person in my shoes wouldn't be expected to divvy out anything even in ancient Rome! Someone should be funding my academic pursuits first, then when I am a success I'll pay a good wholesome amount.

Personally I'd like to see a committee formed to recreate ancient Italy in some way over in Italy, or perhaps a realistic frontier in England or perhaps Gaul. Something authentic and not touristy, and preferably actually over there, though I'm not too adverse to seeing something in the States either.

Di uos incolumes custodiant, ualete!

On Sat, Dec 13, 2008 at 7:55 PM, Robert Levee <galerius_of_ rome@yahoo. com> wrote:

Ap.Galerius Aurelianus Stefen Ullerius Venator Piperbus S.P.D.

Salve,

What a generous challenge you have set before us.I shall follow your lead as well and donate at the first of next month when I recieve my retirement.I am glad to see this string has become so productive.We must get the word out to all concerned in the respublica.You are a true Roman.

Vale,
For The Gods!
Ap.Galerius Aurelianus



--- On Sat, 12/13/08, Stefn Ullerius Venator Piperbarbus <famila.ulleria. venii@gmail. com> wrote:

> From: Stefn Ullerius Venator Piperbarbus <famila.ulleria. venii@gmail. com>
> Subject: [Nova-Roma] Challenge

> To: "NR-Main List" <Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com>
> Date: Saturday, December 13, 2008, 7:41 PM

> Avete Omnes;
>
> I am, this day, sending one day's wages (US$ 110.00
> before taxes) to
> the Nova Roma treasury as a beginning to a Land Fund.
>
> Can the other Cives do the same?
>
> Although Nova Roma is a "US" phenomena; I will
> support a land purchase anywhere.
>
> ============ ========= ========= ========= ==
> In amicitia quod fides -
> Stephanus Ullerius Venator Piperbarbus
> Senator et Custode
> Civis, Patrician, Paterfamilias et Lictor
>
> Religio Septentrionalis - Poetus
>
> Dominus Sodalitas Coquuorum et Cerevisiae Coctorum
> http://groups. yahoo.com/ group/Sodalis_ Coq_et_Coq/
>
> http://www.myspace. com/venator_ poetus
> http://anheathenrea der.blogspot. com/
> http://ullarsskald0 1.Writing. Com/
> http://www.catamoun t-grange- hearth.org/
> http://www.cafepres s.com/catamountg range
> --
> May the Holy Powers smile on our efforts.
> May the Spirits of our family lines nod in approval.
> May we be of Worth to our fellow Nova Romans.



---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Orange vous informe que cet e-mail a été contrôlé par l'anti-virus mail.
Aucun virus connu à ce jour par nos services n'a été détecté.


Group: Nova-Roma Message: 59931 From: Maxima Valeria Messallina Date: 2008-12-14
Subject: Re: What are we?
Salvete,
 
Well said, sir, but Rome was not built in a day and neither will Nova Roma. However, I agree with you that an actual physical presence is needed. Now, someone correct me please if I am wrong, but does not Nova Roma already own land in Texas?
Also, I do remember someone telling me that a group of Nova Romans somewhere in Europe are getting together to live together as Nova Romans; I distinctly remember this because I was asked if I would be willing to join them. So it seems to me that the first steps towards establishing a physical presence are already being taken by some Nova Romans somewhere. Perhaps they could discuss their efforts in more detail here on the ML for the benefit of all of us?
 
Valete bene in pace Deorum,
 
Maxima Valeria Messallina
Sacerdos Vestalis
 

--- On Sat, 12/13/08, Gnaeus Caelius Ahenobarbus <cn.caelius@...> wrote:
From: Gnaeus Caelius Ahenobarbus <cn.caelius@...>
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] What are we?
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Date: Saturday, December 13, 2008, 1:14 PM

Cn. Caelius Ahenobarbus Ap. Galerio Aureliano omnibusque s.p.d.
 
    We must rent or buy land or another facility. Many things come to mind: a small church building in a city, a parcel of land just outside a city, or any number of other options. We could rent a small place and create a temple to the gods, similar to the way little Protestant Christian churches start up all the time. The land option, while giving us more freedom, may or may not be preferable. We could definitely do something with a little bit of land, say 5 to 10 acres. Such parcels are not hard to find, are not expensive, and can be bought via owner-financing in many cases. These things would take not only the physical aspects of money, time, and energy on the part of individual cives and the Republic, but may also involve abstract changes to how the organization itself functions so that such a physical property would be under the control of the appropriate parts of the organization.
    Nova Roma needs a full-time physical presence. That's pretty much all there is to it. Otherwise, we are an academic organization at best and a bunch of role players/fanatics/ weirdos/Internet junkies at worst. I know we all want more than either of those things. We want Rome. Rome must be built.

Optime vale, et valete!
 
--
Gnaeus Caelius Ahenobarbus
Aedilis Oppidi, Oppidum Fluminis Gilae, America Austroccidentalis
Accensus, cos. M. Moravius Piscinus Horatianus et T. Iulius Sabinus
http://becomingnewt hroughtheold. blogspot. com



From: Robert Levee <galerius_of_ rome@yahoo. com>
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com
Sent: Saturday, December 13, 2008 2:06:05 PM
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] What are we?

Ap.Galerius Gnaeus Ahenobarbus S.P.D.,

Very well said sir.Perhaps you could suggest some ways we could come up with some concrete plans to do just that.

Vale,
Ap.Galerius Aurelianus

--- On Sat, 12/13/08, Gnaeus Caelius Ahenobarbus <cn.caelius@yahoo. com> wrote:

> From: Gnaeus Caelius Ahenobarbus <cn.caelius@yahoo. com>
> Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] What are we?
> To: Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com
> Date: Saturday, December 13, 2008, 3:56 PM
> Cn. Caelius Ahenobarbus omnibus s.p.d.
>
> I am in the camp that dislikes the word
> "micronation" due to its connotations of a lack of
> seriousness. We are a corporation of people dedicated to
> restoring Roman values. If we had land, that land could be
> used for a center to do that, with temples, a
> "historical village", and even living quarters for
> those who wished to espouse those values through their lives
> whether part-time or full-time.
>
> Without at least one physical location like that, Nova
> Roma will remain a collection of mailing lists and people
> doing occasional events. If we have any hope of doing any
> more than that, we must become more focused and, yes, more
> serious. We should have land, regular religious rituals,
> classes for the general public, and many other things. This
> past year has seen Nova Roma and Novi Romani involved in
> some amazing events, and that is a great thing. Let us not
> lose the momentum that has been generated. Let us push
> forward with zeal and energy. Let us be Romans.
>
> Optime valete!
>
> --
> Gnaeus Caelius Ahenobarbus
> Aedilis Oppidi, Oppidum Fluminis Gilae, America
> Austroccidentalis
> Accensus, cos. M. Moravius Piscinus Horatianus et T. Iulius
> Sabinus
> http://becomingnewt hroughtheold. blogspot. com



Group: Nova-Roma Message: 59932 From: Lucia Livia Plauta Date: 2008-12-14
Subject: Re: Challenge
Salve Varro,
in Pannonia you can buy a farm for 5000 (five thousand) euros. For
fifteen thousand you can buy one that has electricity and running
water too.

Maybe you should visit us and have a look. We would all be willing to
help, but we don't have capitals at the moment.

Optime vale,
Livia

-- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "philippe cardon"
<philippe.cardon01@...> wrote:
>
> i will sent 100€ for the nexte anniversary of Roma in april
>
> if some want to help me i have the project to create a center here
in gaul
> we can buy a old farm with land and built temple therms and circus
or amphitheater
>
> i have already the place i will wait for money we need so o 150 OOO
€ that is 200 000$
>
> naturralyy that is for NR
> varro
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Q. Valerius Poplicola
> To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Sunday, December 14, 2008 6:58 AM
> Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Challenge
>
>
> Q. Valerius Poplicola omnibus S. P. D.
>
> I simply am unable to pay that much, but if I get a good enough
stipend for grad school this year I'm positive I can donate. However,
a person in my shoes wouldn't be expected to divvy out anything even
in ancient Rome! Someone should be funding my academic pursuits
first, then when I am a success I'll pay a good wholesome amount.
>
> Personally I'd like to see a committee formed to recreate ancient
Italy in some way over in Italy, or perhaps a realistic frontier in
England or perhaps Gaul. Something authentic and not touristy, and
preferably actually over there, though I'm not too adverse to seeing
something in the States either.
>
> Di uos incolumes custodiant, ualete!
>
>
>
> On Sat, Dec 13, 2008 at 7:55 PM, Robert Levee
<galerius_of_rome@...> wrote:
>
> Ap.Galerius Aurelianus Stefen Ullerius Venator Piperbus S.P.D.
>
> Salve,
>
> What a generous challenge you have set before us.I shall follow
your lead as well and donate at the first of next month when I
recieve my retirement.I am glad to see this string has become so
productive.We must get the word out to all concerned in the
respublica.You are a true Roman.
>
> Vale,
> For The Gods!
> Ap.Galerius Aurelianus
>
>
>
> --- On Sat, 12/13/08, Stefn Ullerius Venator Piperbarbus
<famila.ulleria.venii@...> wrote:
>
> > From: Stefn Ullerius Venator Piperbarbus
<famila.ulleria.venii@...>
>
> > Subject: [Nova-Roma] Challenge
>
> > To: "NR-Main List" <Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com>
>
> > Date: Saturday, December 13, 2008, 7:41 PM
>
> > Avete Omnes;
> >
> > I am, this day, sending one day's wages (US$ 110.00
> > before taxes) to
> > the Nova Roma treasury as a beginning to a Land Fund.
> >
> > Can the other Cives do the same?
> >
> > Although Nova Roma is a "US" phenomena; I will
> > support a land purchase anywhere.
> >
> > =========================================
> > In amicitia quod fides -
> > Stephanus Ullerius Venator Piperbarbus
> > Senator et Custode
> > Civis, Patrician, Paterfamilias et Lictor
> >
> > Religio Septentrionalis - Poetus
> >
> > Dominus Sodalitas Coquuorum et Cerevisiae Coctorum
> > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Sodalis_Coq_et_Coq/
> >
> > http://www.myspace.com/venator_poetus
> > http://anheathenreader.blogspot.com/
> > http://ullarsskald01.Writing.Com/
> > http://www.catamount-grange-hearth.org/
> > http://www.cafepress.com/catamountgrange
> > --
> > May the Holy Powers smile on our efforts.
> > May the Spirits of our family lines nod in approval.
> > May we be of Worth to our fellow Nova Romans.
>
>
> Messages in this topic (3) Reply (via web post) | Start a new
topic
> Messages | Members | Calendar
>
>
>
>
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Orange vous informe que cet e-mail a été contrôlé par l'anti-
virus mail.
> Aucun virus connu à ce jour par nos services n'a été détecté.
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 59933 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2008-12-14
Subject: Re: The land in Texas
Salve Maxima Valeria,

Maxima Valeria Messallina <violetphearsen@...> writes:

> does not Nova Roma already own land in Texas?

We own an "undivided portion" of a plot in Culbertson county, Texas,
that we're trying right now to get rid of. It has cost us a
considerable amount of money in taxes and because it's undevided, we
couldn't put up anything of our own if we wanted to. Unfortunately it
appears that M. Cassius Julianus was scammed when he purchased this.

So it's basically useless to us, and we want to rid ourselves of it.
If you look at the Senate Voting Results from July, at
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma/message/57034

You'll see that Item V says: The Senate hereby revokes the senatus
consultum of 26 November MMDCCLVI to classify the land in Texas as
ager publicus.

Vale,

CN-EQVIT-MARINVS
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 59934 From: Maxima Valeria Messallina Date: 2008-12-14
Subject: Re: The land in Texas
Ah, crap. Well, let that be a lesson to us all on the perils of purchasing property.
 
MVM


--- On Sun, 12/14/08, Gnaeus Equitius Marinus <gawne@...> wrote:
From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus <gawne@...>
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: The land in Texas
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Date: Sunday, December 14, 2008, 6:25 AM

Salve Maxima Valeria,

Maxima Valeria Messallina <violetphearsen@ yahoo.com> writes:

> does not Nova Roma already own land in Texas?

We own an "undivided portion" of a plot in Culbertson county, Texas,
that we're trying right now to get rid of. It has cost us a
considerable amount of money in taxes and because it's undevided, we
couldn't put up anything of our own if we wanted to. Unfortunately it
appears that M. Cassius Julianus was scammed when he purchased this.

So it's basically useless to us, and we want to rid ourselves of it.
If you look at the Senate Voting Results from July, at
http://groups. yahoo.com/ group/Nova- Roma/message/ 57034

You'll see that Item V says: The Senate hereby revokes the senatus
consultum of 26 November MMDCCLVI to classify the land in Texas as
ager publicus.

Vale,

CN-EQVIT-MARINVS

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 59935 From: Steve Moore Date: 2008-12-14
Subject: Re: What are we?
M. Valerius Potitus Q. Valerio Poplicola SPD.

I'm very glad to hear about this. I think we're going to see some
great things come out of the Southeast. (Now, if we could only get
some manageable names for our mutual provinces!)

Vale.


--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Q. Valerius Poplicola"
<catullus.poeta@...> wrote:
>
> Q. Valerius Poplicola omnibus sal.
>
> I believe we're doing something like that here. As of January 1, the
> governor of Austrorientalis will also be a tribunus plebis, and both
ciues
> of Memphis will be magistrates, one (Laenas) censor and the other
(myself)
> quaestor.
>
> Local temples/farmland would also be ideal.
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 59936 From: Stefn Ullerius Venator Piperbarbus Date: 2008-12-14
Subject: Venator's recent posts...
Avete Omnes;

Ah, my nefarious purpose is being achieved...cogent, mutually
respectable discussions being undertaken...mwa ha ha ha....

================
In felicitas - Venator
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 59937 From: Publius Memmius Albucius Date: 2008-12-14
Subject: Re: Last Ludi 2761 : IANUALES
Omnibus s.d.

Six hours left to enter your gladiators and athlets in the Ianualia
contests !!

Sign up Quirites!


P. Memmius Albucius
aed. cur.


--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Publius Memmius Albucius"
<albucius_aoe@...> wrote:
>
> Aed. cur. Albucius omnibus s.d.
>
> After the traditional Ludi Plebeii that have been perfectly
organized
> by Aed. Plebis Constantinus and his team, here are coming our last
> Ludi for this year.
>
> These are the last Games of our 10th Birthday year: ludi Ianuales,
> the games of the threshold that will open with this end of
December,
> making a bridge with the beginning of January. They are thus
> dedicated, as a whole, to Ianus, the god of doors and gates, and
his
> cousin Portunus.
>
> These will be modest games, with just a Munera and an Athletica
> contest, in order to end the year with a balanced number of types
of
> competitions (curule and plebeian ones included), and to allow us
at
> the same time to go to Circus Maximus (which will shelter both
> competitions) and to share our time in the celebrations of
Consualia,
> Saturnalia and Opalia.
>
> Our Ianuales will thus be given from coming Mo. Dec. 15 to Dec. 19..
>
> Gladiators and Athlets entries are welcome until Mo. 15th 0 h Rome
> time, at my personal address, or simply on this Forum.
>
> Have good Ludi and good Ianuales events, Quirites!
>
> Valete omnes,
>
>
> P. Memmius Albucius
> aed. cur.
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 59938 From: Publius Memmius Albucius Date: 2008-12-14
Subject: A reminder on oathes of office
Salvete omnes,

As elected praetor, I feel necessary to remind all the elected
magistrates that the oath of office is organized by Lex Iunia de
iusiurando 19 Oct 52, modified by lex Cassia de iusiurando 04 Dec 54.

Lex Iunia provides:

"The Lex Iunia Iusiurando is hereby enacted to put in place an Oath
of Office for any citizen assuming any magistracy of Nova Roma,
whether elected or appointed.

The following oath must be taken publicly in the major public fora of
Nova Roma before someone elected or appointed to any magistracy can
assume his or her office. It must be taken on the day, or as soon as
possible afterwards, that the office is to be assumed. The office
shall be considered vacant until the oath is taken.

"I, (enter the legal and Roman names here) do hereby solemnly swear
to uphold the honor of Nova Roma, and to act always in the best
interests of the people and the Senate of Nova Roma.

As a magistrate of Nova Roma, I, (enter the Roman name here) swear to
honor the Gods and Goddesses of Rome in my public dealings, and to
pursue the Roman Virtues in my public and private life.

I, (enter the Roman name here) swear to uphold and defend the Religio
Romana as the State Religion of Nova Roma and swear never to act in a
way that would threaten its status as the State Religion.

I, (enter the Roman name here) swear to protect and defend the
Constitution of Nova Roma.

I, (enter the Roman name here) further swear to fulfill the
obligations and responsibilities of the office of (enter the title of
the office here) to the best of my abilities.

On my honor as a Citizen of Nova Roma, and in the presence of the
Gods and Goddesses of the Roman people and by their will and favor,
do I accept the position of (enter title of office here) and all the
rights, privileges, obligations, and responsibilities attendant
thereto."

Every concerned civis has just to copy the above oath and fill it
with his name(s). Every other oathes have no legal value, even if
written in the best intents and good faith. :-)

Please also note that the oath is to be pronounced from Jan. 1st on,
and "as soon as possible" after this day, except for our tribunes who
have entered in office last Dec. 10.

Valete omnes,


P. Memmius Albucius
pr. el.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 59939 From: Titus Flavius Aquila Date: 2008-12-14
Subject: AW: [Nova-Roma] Challenge / Land fund
T.Flavius Aquila Ap.Galerio Aureliano Tribunus Plebis salutem plurimam dicit 
I have always supported the idea of a Land Fund and I always will. After all, that is why we are here for, to build up Nova Roma,
a sovereign Republic and thus we need Land, at least for constituting this claim. 
 
Could our money be better, nobler invested , than in the right land for our res publica ? 
 
I fully support the idea of a Land fund and thus I would like to see a sodalitas being formed, with a Charter and a clear direction concerning
this Land fund.I am willing to join the sodalitas as soon as it has been formed.
 
Optime vale
Titus Flavius Aquila
Quaestor electus

Von: Robert Levee <galerius_of_rome@...>
An: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Gesendet: Sonntag, den 14. Dezember 2008, 02:55:51 Uhr
Betreff: Re: [Nova-Roma] Challenge

Ap.Galerius Aurelianus Stefen Ullerius Venator Piperbus S.P.D.

Salve,

What a generous challenge you have set before us.I shall follow your lead as well and donate at the first of next month when I recieve my retirement.I am glad to see this string has become so productive.We must get the word out to all concerned in the respublica.You are a true Roman.

Vale,
For The Gods!
Ap.Galerius Aurelianus

--- On Sat, 12/13/08, Stefn Ullerius Venator Piperbarbus <famila.ulleria. venii@gmail. com> wrote:

> From: Stefn Ullerius Venator Piperbarbus <famila.ulleria. venii@gmail. com>
> Subject: [Nova-Roma] Challenge
> To: "NR-Main List" <Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com>
> Date: Saturday, December 13, 2008, 7:41 PM
> Avete Omnes;
>
> I am, this day, sending one day's wages (US$ 110.00
> before taxes) to
> the Nova Roma treasury as a beginning to a Land Fund.
>
> Can the other Cives do the same?
>
> Although Nova Roma is a "US" phenomena; I will
> support a land purchase anywhere.
>
> ============ ========= ========= ========= ==
> In amicitia quod fides -
> Stephanus Ullerius Venator Piperbarbus
> Senator et Custode
> Civis, Patrician, Paterfamilias et Lictor
>
> Religio Septentrionalis - Poetus
>
> Dominus Sodalitas Coquuorum et Cerevisiae Coctorum
> http://groups. yahoo.com/ group/Sodalis_ Coq_et_Coq/
>
> http://www.myspace. com/venator_ poetus
> http://anheathenrea der.blogspot. com/
> http://ullarsskald0 1.Writing. Com/
> http://www.catamoun t-grange- hearth.org/
> http://www.cafepres s.com/catamountg range
> --
> May the Holy Powers smile on our efforts.
> May the Spirits of our family lines nod in approval.
> May we be of Worth to our fellow Nova Romans.


Group: Nova-Roma Message: 59940 From: Gnaeus Caelius Ahenobarbus Date: 2008-12-14
Subject: The Coloniae-Romanae List
Cn. Caelius Ahenobarbus omnibus salutem plurimam dicit

With all the discussion about the land fund and such, I feel this is the right time to announce a list. A little while back, I started discussing this subject with other Novi Romani. To facilitate discussion, we created a list: Coloniae-Romanae. Its goal is to give us a place to dicuss, in detail, the discovery of land and the purchase thereof, and to create real Roman communities. There are already some good messages there. If you're interested, go to the URL below and request membership. The list is currently moderated, but you should be approved quickly.

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Coloniae-Romanae/

To the dream of a Roman settlement! Optime valete!

--
Gnaeus Caelius Ahenobarbus
Aedilis Oppidi, Oppidum Fluminis Gilae, America Austroccidentalis
Accensus, cos. M. Moravius Piscinus Horatianus et T. Iulius Sabinus
http://becomingnewthroughtheold.blogspot.com
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 59941 From: philippe cardon Date: 2008-12-14
Subject: Re: Challenge
well coming from you I don' know how i must take it
 
but if it costs so less what do you wait to buy... with electricity and water please
 
for me i don't wait what will happen in pannonia
I announce i have the place farm with land possibility to sleepand camp for many people eating made by my wife meeting room fr discussion and woship
t will be open for all soon in France near switzerland and italy so easy for people from theese countries to join, NR or pagan otherwise
i don't buy it I take foer some money by month but it is possible to buy it and build what we what
challenge is opne you're all welcome
Varro
 
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Sunday, December 14, 2008 3:01 PM
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Challenge

Salve Varro,
in Pannonia you can buy a farm for 5000 (five thousand) euros. For
fifteen thousand you can buy one that has electricity and running
water too.

Maybe you should visit us and have a look. We would all be willing to
help, but we don't have capitals at the moment.

Optime vale,
Livia

-- In Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com, "philippe cardon"
<philippe.cardon01@ ...> wrote:
>
> i will sent 100€ for the nexte anniversary of Roma in april
>
> if some want to help me i have the project to create a center here
in gaul
> we can buy a old farm with land and built temple therms and circus
or amphitheater
>
> i have already the place i will wait for money we need so o 150 OOO
€ that is 200 000$
>
> naturralyy that is for NR
> varro
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Q. Valerius Poplicola
> To: Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com
> Sent: Sunday, December 14, 2008 6:58 AM
> Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Challenge
>
>
> Q. Valerius Poplicola omnibus S. P. D.
>
> I simply am unable to pay that much, but if I get a good enough
stipend for grad school this year I'm positive I can donate. However,
a person in my shoes wouldn't be expected to divvy out anything even
in ancient Rome! Someone should be funding my academic pursuits
first, then when I am a success I'll pay a good wholesome amount.
>
> Personally I'd like to see a committee formed to recreate ancient
Italy in some way over in Italy, or perhaps a realistic frontier in
England or perhaps Gaul. Something authentic and not touristy, and
preferably actually over there, though I'm not too adverse to seeing
something in the States either.
>
> Di uos incolumes custodiant, ualete!
>
>
>
> On Sat, Dec 13, 2008 at 7:55 PM, Robert Levee
<galerius_of_ rome@...> wrote:
>
> Ap.Galerius Aurelianus Stefen Ullerius Venator Piperbus S.P.D.
>
> Salve,
>
> What a generous challenge you have set before us.I shall follow
your lead as well and donate at the first of next month when I
recieve my retirement.I am glad to see this string has become so
productive.We must get the word out to all concerned in the
respublica.You are a true Roman.
>
> Vale,
> For The Gods!
> Ap.Galerius Aurelianus
>
>
>
> --- On Sat, 12/13/08, Stefn Ullerius Venator Piperbarbus
<famila.ulleria. venii@... > wrote:
>
> > From: Stefn Ullerius Venator Piperbarbus
<famila.ulleria. venii@... >
>
> > Subject: [Nova-Roma] Challenge
>
> > To: "NR-Main List" <Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com>
>
> > Date: Saturday, December 13, 2008, 7:41 PM
>
> > Avete Omnes;
> >
> > I am, this day, sending one day's wages (US$ 110.00
> > before taxes) to
> > the Nova Roma treasury as a beginning to a Land Fund.
> >
> > Can the other Cives do the same?
> >
> > Although Nova Roma is a "US" phenomena; I will
> > support a land purchase anywhere.
> >
> > ============ ========= ========= ========= ==
> > In amicitia quod fides -
> > Stephanus Ullerius Venator Piperbarbus
> > Senator et Custode
> > Civis, Patrician, Paterfamilias et Lictor
> >
> > Religio Septentrionalis - Poetus
> >
> > Dominus Sodalitas Coquuorum et Cerevisiae Coctorum
> > http://groups. yahoo.com/ group/Sodalis_ Coq_et_Coq/
> >
> > http://www.myspace. com/venator_ poetus
> > http://anheathenrea der.blogspot. com/
> > http://ullarsskald0 1.Writing. Com/
> > http://www.catamoun t-grange- hearth.org/
> > http://www.cafepres s.com/catamountg range
> > --
> > May the Holy Powers smile on our efforts.
> > May the Spirits of our family lines nod in approval.
> > May we be of Worth to our fellow Nova Romans.
>
>
> Messages in this topic (3) Reply (via web post) | Start a new
topic
> Messages | Members | Calendar
>
>
>
>
>
>
------------ --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- -
> Orange vous informe que cet e-mail a été contrôlé par l'anti-
virus mail.
> Aucun virus connu à ce jour par nos services n'a été détecté.
>


---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Orange vous informe que cet e-mail a été contrôlé par l'anti-virus mail.
Aucun virus connu à ce jour par nos services n'a été détecté.


Group: Nova-Roma Message: 59942 From: philippe cardon Date: 2008-12-14
Subject: Re: Challenge
i add if som people want tocometo live here you're also welcome
Varro
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Sunday, December 14, 2008 3:01 PM
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Challenge

Salve Varro,
in Pannonia you can buy a farm for 5000 (five thousand) euros. For
fifteen thousand you can buy one that has electricity and running
water too.

Maybe you should visit us and have a look. We would all be willing to
help, but we don't have capitals at the moment.

Optime vale,
Livia

-- In Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com, "philippe cardon"
<philippe.cardon01@ ...> wrote:
>
> i will sent 100€ for the nexte anniversary of Roma in april
>
> if some want to help me i have the project to create a center here
in gaul
> we can buy a old farm with land and built temple therms and circus
or amphitheater
>
> i have already the place i will wait for money we need so o 150 OOO
€ that is 200 000$
>
> naturralyy that is for NR
> varro
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Q. Valerius Poplicola
> To: Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com
> Sent: Sunday, December 14, 2008 6:58 AM
> Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Challenge
>
>
> Q. Valerius Poplicola omnibus S. P. D.
>
> I simply am unable to pay that much, but if I get a good enough
stipend for grad school this year I'm positive I can donate. However,
a person in my shoes wouldn't be expected to divvy out anything even
in ancient Rome! Someone should be funding my academic pursuits
first, then when I am a success I'll pay a good wholesome amount.
>
> Personally I'd like to see a committee formed to recreate ancient
Italy in some way over in Italy, or perhaps a realistic frontier in
England or perhaps Gaul. Something authentic and not touristy, and
preferably actually over there, though I'm not too adverse to seeing
something in the States either.
>
> Di uos incolumes custodiant, ualete!
>
>
>
> On Sat, Dec 13, 2008 at 7:55 PM, Robert Levee
<galerius_of_ rome@...> wrote:
>
> Ap.Galerius Aurelianus Stefen Ullerius Venator Piperbus S.P.D.
>
> Salve,
>
> What a generous challenge you have set before us.I shall follow
your lead as well and donate at the first of next month when I
recieve my retirement.I am glad to see this string has become so
productive.We must get the word out to all concerned in the
respublica.You are a true Roman.
>
> Vale,
> For The Gods!
> Ap.Galerius Aurelianus
>
>
>
> --- On Sat, 12/13/08, Stefn Ullerius Venator Piperbarbus
<famila.ulleria. venii@... > wrote:
>
> > From: Stefn Ullerius Venator Piperbarbus
<famila.ulleria. venii@... >
>
> > Subject: [Nova-Roma] Challenge
>
> > To: "NR-Main List" <Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com>
>
> > Date: Saturday, December 13, 2008, 7:41 PM
>
> > Avete Omnes;
> >
> > I am, this day, sending one day's wages (US$ 110.00
> > before taxes) to
> > the Nova Roma treasury as a beginning to a Land Fund.
> >
> > Can the other Cives do the same?
> >
> > Although Nova Roma is a "US" phenomena; I will
> > support a land purchase anywhere.
> >
> > ============ ========= ========= ========= ==
> > In amicitia quod fides -
> > Stephanus Ullerius Venator Piperbarbus
> > Senator et Custode
> > Civis, Patrician, Paterfamilias et Lictor
> >
> > Religio Septentrionalis - Poetus
> >
> > Dominus Sodalitas Coquuorum et Cerevisiae Coctorum
> > http://groups. yahoo.com/ group/Sodalis_ Coq_et_Coq/
> >
> > http://www.myspace. com/venator_ poetus
> > http://anheathenrea der.blogspot. com/
> > http://ullarsskald0 1.Writing. Com/
> > http://www.catamoun t-grange- hearth.org/
> > http://www.cafepres s.com/catamountg range
> > --
> > May the Holy Powers smile on our efforts.
> > May the Spirits of our family lines nod in approval.
> > May we be of Worth to our fellow Nova Romans.
>
>
> Messages in this topic (3) Reply (via web post) | Start a new
topic
> Messages | Members | Calendar
>
>
>
>
>
>
------------ --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- -
> Orange vous informe que cet e-mail a été contrôlé par l'anti-
virus mail.
> Aucun virus connu à ce jour par nos services n'a été détecté.
>


---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Orange vous informe que cet e-mail a été contrôlé par l'anti-virus mail.
Aucun virus connu à ce jour par nos services n'a été détecté.


Group: Nova-Roma Message: 59943 From: Lucia Livia Plauta Date: 2008-12-14
Subject: Re: Challenge
Salve Varro,
I wait to buy because money doesn't grow on trees ...
Maybe in two or three years I will have been able to save that much.

Yours is very good news, though coming from you, I don't know how I
should take it ... But it looks as if you are near enough to visit.
You should make arrangements with Albucius, maybe it would be a good
side program after the Gallia conventus this summer.

Anyway you, and other people, might be interested in knowing that
there's a Yahoo list for people interested in creating Nova Roma
colonies:

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Coloniae-Romanae/

I just joined, because its existence so far had been a well-kept
secret, but it is "a forum for those seriously interested in
fulfilling the Declaration of Nova Roma in the following two regards:
a) the acquisition of ever larger areas of official land for Nova
Roma in various locations, and b) the use of such land either through
periodical activities carried out on it or through full colonisation
by the establishment of permanent living communities."

Optime vale,
Livia


--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "philippe cardon"
<philippe.cardon01@...> wrote:
>
> well coming from you I don' know how i must take it
>
> but if it costs so less what do you wait to buy... with electricity
and water please
>
> for me i don't wait what will happen in pannonia
> I announce i have the place farm with land possibility to sleepand
camp for many people eating made by my wife meeting room fr
discussion and woship
> t will be open for all soon in France near switzerland and italy so
easy for people from theese countries to join, NR or pagan otherwise
> i don't buy it I take foer some money by month but it is possible
to buy it and build what we what
> challenge is opne you're all welcome
> Varro
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Lucia Livia Plauta
> To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Sunday, December 14, 2008 3:01 PM
> Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Challenge
>
>
> Salve Varro,
> in Pannonia you can buy a farm for 5000 (five thousand) euros.
For
> fifteen thousand you can buy one that has electricity and running
> water too.
>
> Maybe you should visit us and have a look. We would all be
willing to
> help, but we don't have capitals at the moment.
>
> Optime vale,
> Livia
>
> -- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "philippe cardon"
> <philippe.cardon01@> wrote:
> >
> > i will sent 100â,¬ for the nexte anniversary of Roma in april
> >
> > if some want to help me i have the project to create a center
here
> in gaul
> > we can buy a old farm with land and built temple therms and
circus
> or amphitheater
> >
> > i have already the place i will wait for money we need so o 150
OOO
> â,¬ that is 200 000$
> >
> > naturralyy that is for NR
> > varro
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: Q. Valerius Poplicola
> > To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> > Sent: Sunday, December 14, 2008 6:58 AM
> > Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Challenge
> >
> >
> > Q. Valerius Poplicola omnibus S. P. D.
> >
> > I simply am unable to pay that much, but if I get a good enough
> stipend for grad school this year I'm positive I can donate.
However,
> a person in my shoes wouldn't be expected to divvy out anything
even
> in ancient Rome! Someone should be funding my academic pursuits
> first, then when I am a success I'll pay a good wholesome amount.
> >
> > Personally I'd like to see a committee formed to recreate
ancient
> Italy in some way over in Italy, or perhaps a realistic frontier
in
> England or perhaps Gaul. Something authentic and not touristy,
and
> preferably actually over there, though I'm not too adverse to
seeing
> something in the States either.
> >
> > Di uos incolumes custodiant, ualete!
> >
> >
> >
> > On Sat, Dec 13, 2008 at 7:55 PM, Robert Levee
> <galerius_of_rome@> wrote:
> >
> > Ap.Galerius Aurelianus Stefen Ullerius Venator Piperbus S.P.D.
> >
> > Salve,
> >
> > What a generous challenge you have set before us.I shall follow
> your lead as well and donate at the first of next month when I
> recieve my retirement.I am glad to see this string has become so
> productive.We must get the word out to all concerned in the
> respublica.You are a true Roman.
> >
> > Vale,
> > For The Gods!
> > Ap.Galerius Aurelianus
> >
> >
> >
> > --- On Sat, 12/13/08, Stefn Ullerius Venator Piperbarbus
> <famila.ulleria.venii@> wrote:
> >
> > > From: Stefn Ullerius Venator Piperbarbus
> <famila.ulleria.venii@>
> >
> > > Subject: [Nova-Roma] Challenge
> >
> > > To: "NR-Main List" <Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com>
> >
> > > Date: Saturday, December 13, 2008, 7:41 PM
> >
> > > Avete Omnes;
> > >
> > > I am, this day, sending one day's wages (US$ 110.00
> > > before taxes) to
> > > the Nova Roma treasury as a beginning to a Land Fund.
> > >
> > > Can the other Cives do the same?
> > >
> > > Although Nova Roma is a "US" phenomena; I will
> > > support a land purchase anywhere.
> > >
> > > =========================================
> > > In amicitia quod fides -
> > > Stephanus Ullerius Venator Piperbarbus
> > > Senator et Custode
> > > Civis, Patrician, Paterfamilias et Lictor
> > >
> > > Religio Septentrionalis - Poetus
> > >
> > > Dominus Sodalitas Coquuorum et Cerevisiae Coctorum
> > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Sodalis_Coq_et_Coq/
> > >
> > > http://www.myspace.com/venator_poetus
> > > http://anheathenreader.blogspot.com/
> > > http://ullarsskald01.Writing.Com/
> > > http://www.catamount-grange-hearth.org/
> > > http://www.cafepress.com/catamountgrange
> > > --
> > > May the Holy Powers smile on our efforts.
> > > May the Spirits of our family lines nod in approval.
> > > May we be of Worth to our fellow Nova Romans.
> >
> >
> > Messages in this topic (3) Reply (via web post) | Start a new
> topic
> > Messages | Members | Calendar
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> ----------------------------------------------------------
> > Orange vous informe que cet e-mail a été contrôlé par
l'anti-
> virus mail.
> > Aucun virus connu à ce jour par nos services n'a été
détecté.
> >
>
>
>
>
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Orange vous informe que cet e-mail a été contrôlé par l'anti-
virus mail.
> Aucun virus connu à ce jour par nos services n'a été détecté.
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 59944 From: Gnaeus Caelius Ahenobarbus Date: 2008-12-14
Subject: The Coloniae Romanae List (attempt 2)
(This is the second attempt at posting to the list. The first message never came through. -- GCA)

Cn. Caelius Ahenobarbus omnibus salutem plurimam dicit

With
all the discussion about the land fund and such, I feel this is the
right time to announce a list. A little while back, I started
discussing this subject with other Novi Romani. To facilitate
discussion, we created a list: Coloniae-Romanae. Its goal is to give us
a place to dicuss, in detail, the discovery of land and the purchase
thereof, and to create real Roman communities. There are already some
good messages there. If you're interested, go to the URL below and
request membership. The list is currently moderated, but you should be
approved quickly.

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Coloniae-Romanae/

To the dream of a Roman settlement! Optime valete!
--
Gnaeus Caelius Ahenobarbus
Aedilis Oppidi, Oppidum Fluminis Gilae, America Austroccidentalis
Accensus, cos. M. Moravius Piscinus Horatianus et T. Iulius Sabinus
http://becomingnewthroughtheold.blogspot.com
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 59945 From: Publius Memmius Albucius Date: 2008-12-14
Subject: Re: Challenge + come back
Varroni s.d.

Bienvenue à nouveau, Varro !
Welcome back Varro !

On the project of buying a land in Gaul for NR this is a wonderful
project, but keep in mind first to promote your project and show that
you can handle it, specially in these times of economic crisis.
Such a project must also inter alia - in order to be successful - get
the support of the Senate and of provincia Gallia. Good luck! I
remain at your disposal as governor Galliae.

Sur ton projet d'achat d'un terrain en Gaule pour NR, c'est un projet
merveilleux, mais garde à l'esprit qu'il te sera nécessaire de le
promouvoir et de montrer que tu peux l'assumer, notamment dans le
contexte actuel de crise économique.
Un tel projet doit aussi, inter alia, et afin d'être une réussite,
recevoir le soutien du Sénat et de la province de Gaule.
Bonne chance ! Je reste à ta disposition comme gouverneur de Gaule.

Vale bene,


P. Memmius Albucius
leg. pp. Galliae





--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "philippe cardon"
<philippe.cardon01@...> wrote:
>
> i add if som people want tocometo live here you're also welcome
> Varro
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Lucia Livia Plauta
> To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Sunday, December 14, 2008 3:01 PM
> Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Challenge
>
>
> Salve Varro,
> in Pannonia you can buy a farm for 5000 (five thousand) euros.
For
> fifteen thousand you can buy one that has electricity and running
> water too.
>
> Maybe you should visit us and have a look. We would all be
willing to
> help, but we don't have capitals at the moment.
>
> Optime vale,
> Livia
>
> -- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "philippe cardon"
> <philippe.cardon01@> wrote:
> >
> > i will sent 100â,¬ for the nexte anniversary of Roma in april
> >
> > if some want to help me i have the project to create a center
here
> in gaul
> > we can buy a old farm with land and built temple therms and
circus
> or amphitheater
> >
> > i have already the place i will wait for money we need so o 150
OOO
> â,¬ that is 200 000$
> >
> > naturralyy that is for NR
> > varro
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: Q. Valerius Poplicola
> > To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> > Sent: Sunday, December 14, 2008 6:58 AM
> > Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Challenge
> >
> >
> > Q. Valerius Poplicola omnibus S. P. D.
> >
> > I simply am unable to pay that much, but if I get a good enough
> stipend for grad school this year I'm positive I can donate.
However,
> a person in my shoes wouldn't be expected to divvy out anything
even
> in ancient Rome! Someone should be funding my academic pursuits
> first, then when I am a success I'll pay a good wholesome amount.
> >
> > Personally I'd like to see a committee formed to recreate
ancient
> Italy in some way over in Italy, or perhaps a realistic frontier
in
> England or perhaps Gaul. Something authentic and not touristy,
and
> preferably actually over there, though I'm not too adverse to
seeing
> something in the States either.
> >
> > Di uos incolumes custodiant, ualete!
> >
> >
> >
> > On Sat, Dec 13, 2008 at 7:55 PM, Robert Levee
> <galerius_of_rome@> wrote:
> >
> > Ap.Galerius Aurelianus Stefen Ullerius Venator Piperbus S.P.D.
> >
> > Salve,
> >
> > What a generous challenge you have set before us.I shall follow
> your lead as well and donate at the first of next month when I
> recieve my retirement.I am glad to see this string has become so
> productive.We must get the word out to all concerned in the
> respublica.You are a true Roman.
> >
> > Vale,
> > For The Gods!
> > Ap.Galerius Aurelianus
> >
> >
> >
> > --- On Sat, 12/13/08, Stefn Ullerius Venator Piperbarbus
> <famila.ulleria.venii@> wrote:
> >
> > > From: Stefn Ullerius Venator Piperbarbus
> <famila.ulleria.venii@>
> >
> > > Subject: [Nova-Roma] Challenge
> >
> > > To: "NR-Main List" <Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com>
> >
> > > Date: Saturday, December 13, 2008, 7:41 PM
> >
> > > Avete Omnes;
> > >
> > > I am, this day, sending one day's wages (US$ 110.00
> > > before taxes) to
> > > the Nova Roma treasury as a beginning to a Land Fund.
> > >
> > > Can the other Cives do the same?
> > >
> > > Although Nova Roma is a "US" phenomena; I will
> > > support a land purchase anywhere.
> > >
> > > =========================================
> > > In amicitia quod fides -
> > > Stephanus Ullerius Venator Piperbarbus
> > > Senator et Custode
> > > Civis, Patrician, Paterfamilias et Lictor
> > >
> > > Religio Septentrionalis - Poetus
> > >
> > > Dominus Sodalitas Coquuorum et Cerevisiae Coctorum
> > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Sodalis_Coq_et_Coq/
> > >
> > > http://www.myspace.com/venator_poetus
> > > http://anheathenreader.blogspot.com/
> > > http://ullarsskald01.Writing.Com/
> > > http://www.catamount-grange-hearth.org/
> > > http://www.cafepress.com/catamountgrange
> > > --
> > > May the Holy Powers smile on our efforts.
> > > May the Spirits of our family lines nod in approval.
> > > May we be of Worth to our fellow Nova Romans.
> >
> >
> > Messages in this topic (3) Reply (via web post) | Start a new
> topic
> > Messages | Members | Calendar
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> ----------------------------------------------------------
> > Orange vous informe que cet e-mail a été contrôlé par
l'anti-
> virus mail.
> > Aucun virus connu à ce jour par nos services n'a été
détecté.
> >
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------
> Orange vous informe que cet e-mail a été contrôlé par l'anti-
virus mail.
> Aucun virus connu à ce jour par nos services n'a été détecté.
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 59946 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2008-12-14
Subject: Re: AW: [Nova-Roma] Challenge / Land fund
Titus Flavius Aquila <titus.aquila@...> writes:

> I fully support the idea of a Land fund

We already have one. If anybody wants to donate money to it, just
send it as you would a tax payment, specifying that the money is for
the land fund.

Vale,

CN-EQVIT-MARINVS
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 59947 From: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com Date: 2008-12-14
Subject: Nova Roma has Amazon shops!, 12/15/2008, 12:00 am
Reminder from:   Nova-Roma Yahoo! Group
 
Title:   Nova Roma has Amazon shops!
 
Date:   Monday December 15, 2008
Time:   All Day
Repeats:   This event repeats every Monday, Wednesday, and Friday until Wednesday December 31, 2008.
Notes:   Nova Roma now has Amazon shops! Buy through these shops and a portion of your price is returned to Nova Roma. See http://www.novaroma.org/nr/Amazon_affiliate for links.
 
Copyright © 2008  Yahoo! Inc. All Rights Reserved | Terms of Service | Privacy Policy
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 59948 From: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com Date: 2008-12-14
Subject: File - EDICTUM DE SERMONE
Ex officio praetorum:

The Nova-Roma mailing list is the principal forum for Nova Roma.
Citizens of Nova Roma and interested non-citizens alike are welcome. All users, citizen and non-citizen alike, shall abide by these rules when posting to the Nova Roma mailing list. Violations of these rules will result in corrective action, which may include banning from the list for non-citizens and restriction of posting privileges for citizens.


---

I. Language

Nova Roma's official business language is English, and its official ceremonial language is Latin. There are other non-official languages that must be considered as common use languages, due to the international nature of the Nova Roman community. To insure timely posting, write your posts in English, French, German, Hungarian, Italian, Latin, Portuguese or Spanish. If you write your posts in languages other than the above mentioned, they may be delayed for some time until the moderators can obtain a translation.



All official government documents must appear in English/Latin as well as whatever vernacular languages are relevant.



---


II. Topics of discussion

Nova Roman business, community, governmental, religious, and other state activities

The culture, religion, sociology, politics, history, archaeology, and philosophy of Roma Antiqua, ancient Greece, the ancient Near East, and other cultures with which the ancient Romans interacted.

Discussions may sometimes go into subjects beyond these topics, but such digressions should be brief and related to the listed topics. Messages of this kind must be clearly marked as �off topic�.



---

III. Civil Discourse

All on-list exchanges between users of the Nova-Roma mailing list will follow these rules of civil discourse:

Show respect for others.

Recognize a person�s right to advocate ideas that are different from your own.

Discuss policies and ideas without attacking people.

Use helpful, not hurtful language.

Write as you would like to be written to.

Restate ideas when asked.

Write in good faith.

Treat what others have to say as written in good faith.

Respectfully read and consider differing points of view.

When unsure, clarify what you think you have read.

Realize that what you wrote and what people understand you to have written may be different.

Recognize that people can agree to disagree.

Speak and write for yourself, not others.



---

IV. Forbidden

The following are forbidden:

Unsolicited commercial e-mail (UCE or spam)

References or discussions to material of a sexual nature that are not strictly within the context of a historical discussion, with citations given, unless the material is a matter of common knowledge

Links to external websites or files which contain material that might reasonably be deemed obscene or pornographic.



Insulting the religious beliefs of others, and the historical basis for those beliefs, is off limits.



This edict takes effect immediately.



Given under our hands this 20th day of January 2761 from the founding of Roma



M. Curiatius Complutensis

M.Iulius Severus



Praetores Novae Romae
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 59949 From: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com Date: 2008-12-14
Subject: File - language.txt
Nova Roma's official business language is English, and its official ceremonial language is Latin. There are other non-official languages that must be considered as common use languages, due to the international nature of the Nova Roman community. To insure timely posting, write your posts in English, French, German, Hungarian, Italian, Latin, Portuguese or Spanish.

---------------------------

El idioma de trabajo de Nova Roma es el Ingl�s, y su lenguaje ceremonial es el Lat�n. Hay otros idiomas no oficiales que deben ser considerados de uso com�n, debido a la naturaleza internacional de la comunidad nova romana. Para asegurar que la publicaci�n inmediata de los mensajes, escriba en Ingl�s, Franc�s, Alem�n, H�ngaro, Italiano, Lat�n, Portugu�s o Espa�ol.

-----------------------------

La lingua ufficiale a Nova Roma � l�Inglese e quella ceremoniale � il Latino. Ci sono altre lingue non ufficiali che devono essere considerate d�uso comune dovuto al carattere internazionale della comunit� nova romana. Per assicurarsi dell�immediata pubblicazione dei messaggi pu� scrivere in Inglese, Francese, Tedesco, Ungherese, Italiano, Latino, Portoghese o Spagnolo.

-----------------------------
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 59950 From: Maior Date: 2008-12-14
Subject: Saturnalia December 17th & the deleted Calendar
Maior omnibus spd;
Saturnalia will start in two days, the Main List had calendar
postings to remind us of our best holiday, historical reference,poems -
a lot of work was put into it. And it has all been deleted. By whom...?
I don't know, but it's the act of a weakling.
This person isn't going to stop me from celebrating in Mons
Capella with my friends and NRcives. And it won't stop Nova Roma from
being the fully pagan org it is.

So amici here is a link to Martial's epigrams:
http://www.txclassics.org/saturnaliamartial.htm

let's post an epigram in Latin and have the provincial language
translation: French, Italian, Russian, German, English.
Celebrate Saturnalia Novi Romani!
optime valete
M. Hortensia Maior
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 59951 From: Gaius Petronius Dexter Date: 2008-12-15
Subject: Today in Rome: Dec 15, 2008.
C. Petronius Dexter omnibus Quiritibus s.p.d.,
 
Today in Rome :
 
(Julian day : 2 454 816).
 
A. d. XVIII Kalendas Ianuarias
MMDCCLXII anno Vrbis conditae.
Coss. M. Moravio T. Iulio.
 
Day of the week : Lunae dies (Monday).
 
Lunaris dies: XIX.
Nundinal letter : E.
 
Hora ortus Solis : 07:30.
Hora occasus Solis : 16:39.
Temp. Min. : 10° C.
Temp. Max. : 14° C.
Wind on Rome : 53 Km/h.
Humidity: 77%.
Weather: Showers. Clouds. Cool.
 
Horae diei :
 
I: 07:30 - 08:15 Iovis hora.
II: 08:15 - 09:00 Martis hora.
III: 09:00 - 09:45 Solis hora.
IV: 09:45 - 10:30 Veneris hora.
V: 10:30 - 11:15 Mercurii hora.
VI: 11:15 - 12:00 Lunae hora.
VII: 12:00 - 12:46 Saturni hora.
VIII: 12:46 - 13:33 Iovis hora.
IX: 13:33 - 14:19 Martis hora.
X: 14:19 - 15:06 Solis hora.
XI: 15:06 - 15:52 Veneris hora.
XII: 15:52 - 16:39 Mercurii hora.
 

Horae noctis :
 
I: 16:39 - 17:52 Lunae hora.
II: 17:52 - 19:06 Saturni hora.
III: 19:06 - 20:19 Iovis hora.
IV: 20:19 - 21:33 Martis hora.
V: 21:33 - 22:46 Solis hora.
VI: 22:46 - 00:00 Veneris hora.
VII: 00:00 - 01:15 Mercurii hora.
VIII: 01:15 - 02:30 Lunae hora.
IX: 02:30 - 03:45 Saturni hora.
X: 03:45 - 05:00 Iovis hora.
XI: 05:00 - 06:15 Martis hora.
XII: 06:15 - 07:31 Solis hora.
 

Valete.
 
C. Petronius Dexter.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 59952 From: Gaius Petronius Dexter Date: 2008-12-15
Subject: Precatio Flaminis Portunalis pro decennio exacto et altero decennio
Acta Flaminis Portunalis.
 
Ante diem octavum decimum Kalendas Ianuarias, consulibus M. Moravio Piscino Horatiano T. Iulio Sabino, in Foro Boario, in pronao Portuni, flamen Portunalis ritu Gabinio celebrans hoc pronuntiat :
 
" His decem annis exactis, nunc ad alterum decennium Novae Romae his Ianualibus celebrandis, P. Memmio Albucio Aedili curuli auctore,
intramus. Anno bis millesimo septingentesimo sexagesimo primo exeunte primum decennium Romae Novae exegit et secundum decennium
incipit, tum flaminem Portunalem, C. Petronium Dextrum, vetera vota exsolvere novaque iterare decet ut Portunus pater volens propitius Novis
Romanis in alterum decennium siet tamquam primo decennio fuit.
 
Nova vota sient pro salute et custodia Novae Romae, civium assiduorum, capite censorum, magistratuum, collegii pontificum, collegii augurum,
collegii XVvirorum sacris faciundis, collegii VIIvirorum epulonum, collegii fetialium, sodalitatis Fratrum Arvalium, sodalitatis Lupercorum,
sodalitatis Saliorum, sodalitatis Palatinorum, sodalitatis Agonensium, omnium sacerdotumque."
 
Flamen Portunalis, C. Petronius Dexter, dexteram manum in ara Portuni ponit et manus interluit.
 
Dicit flamen Portunalis:
"Haec aqua a corpore impuritates eluat, ut pluvia aera purgat."
 
Contra aram Portuni flamen Portunalis dicit:
"Iane pater, te hoc ture commovendo bonas preces precor
uti sies volens propitius Romae Novae
decennio secundo."
 
Tus profanatum est.
 
Flamen Portunalis dicit a dextra versus:
"Iuppiter Optime Maxime, huius primae horae tutor,
te hoc ture obmovendo bonas preces precor
uti sies volens propitius Romae Novae
decennio secundo."
 
Tus profanatum est.
 
Flamen Portunalis dicit a sinistra versus:
"Portune pater, o Matris Matutae fili,
clavium custos, portarum portuumque tutor,
te hoc ture ommovendo bonas preces precor
uti sies volens propitius Romae Novae
decennio secundo."
 
Tus profanatum est.
 
Flamen Portunalis dicit solem orientem spectans:
"Vesta mater, ignis aeterni tutela,
te hoc ture obmovendo bonas preces precor
uti sies volens propitia Romae Novae
decennio secundo."
 
Tus profanatum est.
 
Flamen Portunalis C. Petronius Dexter dexteram manum in ara Portuni ponit et manus interluit.
 
Dicit flamen Portunalis:
"Haec aqua a corpore impuritates eluat,
ut pluvia aera purgat."
 
Contra aram Portuni flamen Portunalis dicit:
"Iane pater, uti te ture obmovendo
bonas preces precatus sum,
quoius rei ergo macte vino inferio esto!
Vinum profatum est.
 
Flamen Portunalis dicit:
"Iuppiter Optime Maxime, huius primae horae tutor,
uti te ture ommovendo bonas preces precatus sum,
quoius rei ergo macte vino inferio esto!"
Vinum profatum est.
 
Flamen Portunalis C. Petronius Dexter dexteram manum in ara Portuni ponit et manus interluit.
 
Flamen Portunalis dicit:
"Portune pater, o Matris Matutae fili,
clavium custos, portarum portuumque tutor,
uti te ture ommovendo bonas preces precatus sum,
quoius rei ergo macte vino inferio esto!"
 
Vinum libatum est.
 
Flamen Portunalis dicit:
"Huc ades, Portune pater, huc ades, o Matris Matutae fili,
clavium custos, portarum portuumque tutor,
te ture ommovendo bonas preces quaeso
precorque uti sies volens propitius Novae Romae,
civibus assiduis, capite censis, magistratibus,
collegio pontificum, collegio augurum,
collegio XVvirorum sacris faciundis,
collegio VIIvirorum epulonum, collegio fetialium,
sodalitati Fratrum Arvalium, sodalitati Lupercorum,
sodalitati Saliorum, sodalitati Palatinorum,
sodalitati Agonensium,
omnibusque sacerdotibus in decennium venturum,
quoius rei ergo tu macte ture
pollicito et combusto vinoque inferio esto!"
 
Flamen Portunalis dicit:
"Portune pater, o Matris Matutae fili,
clavium custos, portarum portuumque tutor,
si quid tibi in illis libationibus et illis Iuanalibus
neque satisfactum est, te hoc ture, hoc vino
et his Ianualibus piaculo."
 
Omnes valete in decennium secundum.
 
C. Petronius Dexter.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 59953 From: Titus Flavius Aquila Date: 2008-12-15
Subject: AW: AW: [Nova-Roma] Challenge / Land fund
Salve Senator Marinus,
 
Yes, I know, thank you and I fully support the idea behind it.
 
Vale bene
Titus Flavius Aquila


Von: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus <gawne@...>
An: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Gesendet: Sonntag, den 14. Dezember 2008, 23:55:35 Uhr
Betreff: Re: AW: [Nova-Roma] Challenge / Land fund

Titus Flavius Aquila <titus.aquila@ yahoo.de> writes:

> I fully support the idea of a Land fund

We already have one. If anybody wants to donate money to it, just
send it as you would a tax payment, specifying that the money is for
the land fund.

Vale,

CN-EQVIT-MARINVS


Group: Nova-Roma Message: 59954 From: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com Date: 2008-12-15
Subject: To all in the Far East, 12/15/2008, 12:00 pm
Reminder from:   Nova-Roma Yahoo! Group
 
Title:   To all in the Far East
 
Date:   Monday December 15, 2008
Time:   12:00 pm - 1:00 pm
Repeats:   This event repeats every month.
Location:   http://groups.yahoo.com/group/prov_asia_orientalis/
Notes:   If you live in the Far East, why not join your provincial mailing list? Meet fellow citizens and get active locally. Don't just lurk! Send a message, introduce yourself and get involved! http://groups.yahoo.com/group/prov_asia_orientalis/

Provincial mailing lists are listed in the wiki. Go to http://novaroma.org/nr/Provincia_%28Nova_Roma%29
 
Copyright © 2008  Yahoo! Inc. All Rights Reserved | Terms of Service | Privacy Policy
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 59955 From: marcushoratius Date: 2008-12-15
Subject: a. d. XIIX Kalendas Ianuaris: ara Fortunae Reduci
M. Moravius Piscinus Horatianus Quiritibus et omnibus salutem
plurimam dicit: Curate ut valeatis, et Di vos servent.

Hodie est ante diem XIIX Kalendas Ianuaris; haec dies nefastus est:
ara Fortunae Reduci dedicata

Praeneste celebrated Consualia on 15 Dec., which Rome celebrated two
days earlier on the Ides.


AUC 734 / 19 BCE: Dedication of the Temple of Fortuna Redux

The Senate dedicated an Altar of Fortuna Redux upon the fortunate
return of Augustus to Rome. The Altar was by the Porta Capena, near
the sacred grove of Carmentis. Sacerdotes Augustales were joined by
Vestales Virgines to celebrate the Augustalia, paying tribute to the
Genius of Caesar Augustus.

"For all over the world, in all places, and at all times, Fortuna is
the only Goddess whom every one invokes; She alone is spoken of, She
alone is accused and is supposed to be guilty; She alone is in our
thoughts, is praised and blamed, and is loathed with reproaches;
wavering as She is, conceived by the generality of mankind to be
blind, wandering, inconstant, uncertain, variable, and often
favouring the unworthy. To Her are referred all our losses and all
our gains, and in casting up the accounts of mortals She alone
balances the two pages of our sheet. We are so much in the power of
chance that change itself is considered as a God, and the existence
of God becomes doubtful." ~ Plinius Secundus, Historia Naturalis 2.5

AUC 540 / 213 BCE: Fire at Rome and the marvel in the Temple of
Fortuna

"At Rome there was a dreadful fire that lasted for two nights and a
day. All the buildings between the Salinae and the Porta Carmentalis,
including the Aequimaelium, the Vicus Jugarius, and the temples of
Fortune and Mater Matuta were burnt to the ground. The fire traveled
for a considerable distance outside the gate and destroyed much
property and many sacred objects." ~ Titus Livius 24.47.15

"When the shrine of the Salii was burned, nothing was found in it
intact except for the augural lituus of Romulus. The Statue of
Servius Tullius remained undamaged when the Temple of Fortuna was
destroyed by fire." ~ Valerius Maximus 1.8.11 (see also Cicero, Div.
1.30; Dionysius Halicarnassus 4.40.7)

There was a statue enthroned, an image of Servius:
They say it put a hand to its eyes,
And a voice was heard: `Hide my face,
Lest it view my own wicked daughter.'
It was veiled by cloth, Fortune refused to let the robe
Be removed, and She Herself spoke from her temple:
`The day when the face of Servius is next revealed,
Will be a day when modesty is cast aside.'
...
The temple once burned: but the fire spared
The statue: Volcanus Mulciber preserved His son.
~ Ovid, Fast 6.12-26


AUC 790 / 37 CE: Birth of Nero

Nero was born at Antium nine months after the death of Tiberius, on
the eighteenth day before the Kalends of January, just as the sun
rose, so that he was touched by its rays almost before he could be
laid upon the ground. Many people at once made many direful
predictions from his horoscope, and a remark of his father Domitius
was also regarded as an omen; for while receiving the congratulations
of his friends, he said that "nothing that was not abominable and a
public bane could be born of Agrippina and himself." ~ A. Suetonius
Tranquillus, Life of Nero 6.1


AUC 883 / 130 CE: Birth of Lucius Verus

Lucius Ceionius Aelius Commodus Verus Antoninus, "in character he was
utterly ingenuous and unable to conceal a thing." His father, Lucius
Aelius Verus, was adopted by Hadrian and raised to the rank of
Caesar, but had died before becoming an Augustus. Young Verus
remained a private citizen but in the imperial household. Hadrian
had Marcus Aurelius adopt Verus, and an arrangement provided that
Verus should marry the daughter of Antonius Pius. However it was
Marcus Aurelius who married Faustina, and Verus, being a much
younger man, was instead married to Lucilla, Marcus Aurelius'
daughter. Eventually Marcus Aurelius raised Verus to co-emperor.
Everything that Marcus Aurelius was, Verus was the opposite. He was
fond of chariot races, preferring the Greens too publicly, and
gladiatorial contests, gambling with dice, brawling in taverns,
chasing young boys, other men's wives, hunting, and gluttony, all to
the neglect of his duties. Marcus Aurelius sent him to Syria for the
Parthian War, either to reform him or at least to get him away from
Rome. His failures there brought Lucilla and Marcus Aurelius to
Syria to repair the damage. A pestilence that first began at Babylon
was carried back through the provinces by Verus and his army,
eventually to Rome itself. When war later broke out in Germania, and
then in Panonnia, Marcus Aurelius brought both Verus and Lucilla
along with him. On the return from these wars Verus became seriously
ill, bleeding, and died. Rumors alternated between his having been
poisoned by his mother-in-law Faustina, or by his wife Lucilla. More
likely his gluttony finally got the best of him, much to the benefit
of the Empire.


Today's thought is from Seneca, Epistles 102

"As the mother's womb holds us for ten months, making us ready, not
for the womb itself, but for the existence into which we seem to be
sent forth when at last we are fitted to draw breath and live in the
open; just so, throughout the years extending between infancy and old
age, we are making ourselves ready for another birth. A different
beginning, a different condition, awaits us. We cannot yet, except at
rare intervals, endure the light of heaven; therefore, look forward
without fear to that appointed hour - the last hour of the body but
not of the soul."
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 59956 From: Lucius Cornelius Cicero Date: 2008-12-15
Subject: Salvete!
Salvete omnes

I've been inactive in NR for quite a while but I'm back and looking
forward to actively participating in the Nova Roma and assisting where
I can in achieving the goals and aspirations of the Republic.

I'll be following the list closely and I look forward to corresponding
with all of you.

Bene valete,

Lucius Cornelius Cicero
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 59957 From: James V Hooper Date: 2008-12-15
Subject: Re: Salvete!
Salve, Cicero Amici
May your voice be as elequent as the Cicero of old.
Vale,
Gaius Pompeius Marcellus


On Mon, 15 Dec 2008 14:27:58 -0000
"Lucius Cornelius Cicero" <Cicero@...> wrote:
> Salvete omnes
>
> I've been inactive in NR for quite a while but I'm back and looking
> forward to actively participating in the Nova Roma and assisting where
> I can in achieving the goals and aspirations of the Republic.
>
> I'll be following the list closely and I look forward to corresponding
> with all of you.
>
> Bene valete,
>
> Lucius Cornelius Cicero
>

BB,
Warrior
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 59958 From: Maior Date: 2008-12-15
Subject: Re: What are we?
M. Hortensia M. Valerio Q. Valerioque spd;
I live in this wonderfully active province,America Austrorientalis
too and I'm very proud of our governor Aurelianus and our cives. I am
questrix for 2008 and will take 2009 off as was traditional. With
this time I'm working on organizing the North American Conventus. We
need to meet in real life and honor the gods. Reminds me must write
to Gn. Iulius Caesar the 2009 curule aedile.
valete
Maior
>
> M. Valerius Potitus Q. Valerio Poplicola SPD.
>
> I'm very glad to hear about this. I think we're going to see some
> great things come out of the Southeast. (Now, if we could only get
> some manageable names for our mutual provinces!)
>
> Vale.
>
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Q. Valerius Poplicola"
> <catullus.poeta@> wrote:
> >
> > Q. Valerius Poplicola omnibus sal.
> >
> > I believe we're doing something like that here. As of January 1,
the
> > governor of Austrorientalis will also be a tribunus plebis, and
both
> ciues
> > of Memphis will be magistrates, one (Laenas) censor and the other
> (myself)
> > quaestor.
> >
> > Local temples/farmland would also be ideal.
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 59959 From: Gnaeus Iulius Caesar Date: 2008-12-16
Subject: Formation of Oppidum Laureatum, Provincia Canada Ulterior - Edict 23
Edictum Twenty Three

CANADA ULTERIOR EDICT NUMBER TWENTY THREE EX OFFICIO LEGATUS PRO
PROPRAETORIS CANADA ULTERIOR

I, Gnaeus Iulius Caesar, legatus pro praetore of Provincia Canada
Ulterior, in accordance with Section 3.1.1 of the Lex Fabia de
Oppidis et Municipiis, having received a foedus from the following
citizens,

Gaius Vipsanius Agrippa
Quintus Suetonius Paulinus
Vibia Lucretia Camilla
Sexta Iunia Palladia
Publius Aemilius Lepidus

requesting official approval for the formation of an oppidum in the
City of Edmonton, Alberta have examined this request. I find that it
meets the requirements of Section 3.1.2 of the Lex Fabia de Oppidis
et Municipiis. Accordingly by virtue and authority of this edict I
approve their request.

The official name of this community shall be Oppidum Laureatum and
the geographical limits of the Oppidum shall include the cities of
Edmonton, St. Albert, Spruce Grove, Leduc, Fort Saskatchewan and the
surrounding counties of Parkland, Sturgeon, Strathcona and Leduce.

Further, in accordance with Section 3.1.3 of the Lex Fabia de Oppidis
et Municipiis I appoint Gaius Vipsanius Agrippa and Quintus Suetonius
Paulinus to serve as provisional aediles. They are instructed to call
the comitia oppidana of the Oppidum Laureatum and conduct therein an
election for the appointment of two aediles. This election shall be
held within sixty days from today. The appointment of the provisional
aediles shall expire immediately upon the election of the new
aediles.

This edict is effective immediately.

Given under my hand, this 16th day of December, 2008 in the City of
Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.

Cn. Iulius Caesar
Legatus pro praetore
Provincia Canada Ulterior
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 59960 From: Gaius Petronius Dexter Date: 2008-12-16
Subject: Today in Rome: Dec 16, 2008.
C. Petronius Dexter omnibus Quiritibus s.p.d.,
 
Today in Rome :
 
(Julian day : 2 454 817).
 
A. d. XVII Kalendas Ianuarias
MMDCCLXII anno Vrbis conditae.
Coss. M. Moravio T. Iulio.
 
Day of the week : Martis dies (Tuesday).
 
Lunaris dies: XX.
Nundinal letter : F.
 
Hora ortus Solis : 07:31.
Hora occasus Solis : 16:40.
Temp. Min. : 9° C.
Temp. Max. : 13° C.
Wind on Rome : 30 Km/h.
Humidity: 80%.
Weather: Numerous Showers. Clouds. Cool.
 
Horae diei :
 
I: 07:31 - 08:15 Veneris hora.
II: 08:15 - 09:00 Mercurii hora.
III: 09:00 - 09:45 Lunae hora.
IV: 09:45 - 10:30 Saturni hora.
V: 10:30 - 11:15 Iovis hora.
VI: 11:15 - 12:00 Martis hora.
VII: 12:00 - 12:46 Solis hora.
VIII: 12:46 - 13:33 Veneris hora.
IX: 13:33 - 14:20 Mercurii hora.
X: 14:20 - 15:06 Lunae hora.
XI: 15:06 - 15:53 Saturni hora.
XII: 15:53 - 16:40 Iovis hora.
 

Horae noctis :
 
I: 16:40 - 17:53 Martis hora.
II: 17:53 - 19:06 Solis hora.
III: 19:06 - 20:20 Veneris hora.
IV: 20:20 - 21:33 Mercurii hora.
V: 21:33 - 22:46 Lunae hora.
VI: 22:46 - 00:00 Saturni hora.
VII: 00:00 - 01:15 Iovis hora.
VIII: 01:15 - 02:30 Martis hora.
IX: 02:30 - 03:45 Solis hora.
X: 03:45 - 05:00 Veneris hora.
XI: 05:00 - 06:15 Mercurii hora.
XII: 06:15 - 07:31 Lunae hora.
 

Valete.
 
C. Petronius Dexter.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 59961 From: Gnaeus Iulius Caesar Date: 2008-12-16
Subject: Formation of Oppidum Laureatum, Provincia Canada Ulterior - Edict 23
Edictum Twenty Three

CANADA ULTERIOR EDICT NUMBER TWENTY THREE EX OFFICIO LEGATUS PRO
PROPRAETORIS CANADA ULTERIOR

I, Gnaeus Iulius Caesar, legatus pro praetore of Provincia Canada
Ulterior, in accordance with Section 3.1.1 of the Lex Fabia de
Oppidis et Municipiis, having received a foedus from the following
citizens,

Gaius Vipsanius Agrippa
Quintus Suetonius Paulinus
Vibia Lucretia Camilla
Sexta Iunia Palladia
Publius Aemilius Lepidus

requesting official approval for the formation of an oppidum in the
City of Edmonton, Alberta have examined this request. I find that it
meets the requirements of Section 3.1.2 of the Lex Fabia de Oppidis
et Municipiis. Accordingly by virtue and authority of this edict I
approve their request.

The official name of this community shall be Oppidum Laureatum and
the geographical limits of the Oppidum shall include the cities of
Edmonton, St. Albert, Spruce Grove, Leduc, Fort Saskatchewan and the
surrounding counties of Parkland, Sturgeon, Strathcona and Leduce.

Further, in accordance with Section 3.1.3 of the Lex Fabia de Oppidis
et Municipiis I appoint Gaius Vipsanius Agrippa and Quintus Suetonius
Paulinus to serve as provisional aediles. They are instructed to call
the comitia oppidana of the Oppidum Laureatum and conduct therein an
election for the appointment of two aediles. This election shall be
held within sixty days from today. The appointment of the provisional
aediles shall expire immediately upon the election of the new
aediles.

This edict is effective immediately.

Given under my hand, this 16th day of December, 2008 in the City of
Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.

Cn. Iulius Caesar
Legatus pro praetore
Provincia Canada Ulterior
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 59962 From: fauxrari Date: 2008-12-16
Subject: Gladiator school featured in History Channel's "Cities of the Underg
Salve!
I was just watching television in the US tonight and one of my favorite
shows "Cities of the Underground" had a really interesting episode on
called "Gladiators: Blood Sport" about the huge gladiator school in
Rome (Ludi Magnus) and the facilities in Puteoli. It said on their
website that there's also going to be an episode about Pompeii, too. It
was a pretty intersting tour, even though they called Caesar an
emperor. It always interesting to see how Romans lived and where they
lived.

Here's their summary. You can look at it on their website-
http://www.history.com/minisite.do?
content_type=Minisite_Episodes&content_type_id=53966&display_order=2&min
i_id=53900

Cities Of The Underworld : Gladiators: Blood Sport
Airs on Thursday December 18 10:00 PM

The gladiators of ancient Rome were the ultimate fighting machines.
They waged bloody battles to the death for the entertainment of the
masses--and to earn their freedom. From the depths of the vicious and
magnificent Flavian amphitheater, to the buried brothel where they
lived their last days, these are the secret lives of Rome's famed slave
warriors. Peel back the layers to uncover the origin of these fierce
fighters, as host Don Wildman heads into ancient crypts, subterranean
chambers used for pagan worship, and to the school that taught the
gladiators how survive... and how to kill.

Vale,
L. Antonia Auriga
Master of the Horsepower
(formerly known as L. Junia Bruta)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 59963 From: marcushoratius Date: 2008-12-16
Subject: a. d. XVII Kalendas Ianuaris: Saturnalia Eve
M. Moravius Piscinus Horatianus Quiritibus et omnibus salutem
plurimam dicit: Io Saturnalia! Io Triumphe!

Hodie est ante diem XVII Kalendas Ianuaris; haec dies nefastus est:

"Who knows not of the Golden Age of the care-free King? when no man
subdued fields to his will or sowed grain in them or fended harmful
weeds from the crops which were to come; when plentious harvests
filled the barns to last the year; when, with no tread but his own,
Bacchus ran into wine; when honies dripped from clinging leaves, and
Pallas made flow her own special streams of rich olive-oil: then had
the country graciousness. To none was it e'er vouchsafed to know more
joyously his own times." ~ Anonymous, Aetna

"Saturnus, when once He was entertained by a farmer who had a fair
daughter named Entoria, seduced her and begat Janus, Hymnus, Faustus,
and Felix. He then taught Icarius the use of wine and viniculture,
and told him that he should share his knowledge with his neighbors
also. When the neighbors did so and drank more than is customary,
they fell into an unusually deep sleep. Imagining that they had been
poisoned, they pelted Icarius with stones and killed him; and his
grandchildren in despair ended their lives by hanging themselves.
When a plague had gained a wide hold among the Romans, Apollo gave an
oracle that it would cease if they should appease the wrath of
Saturnus and the spirits of those who had perished unlawfully.
Lutatius Catulus, one of the nobles, built for the God the precinct
which lies near the Tarpeian Rock. He made the upper altar with four
faces, either because of Icarius' grandchildren or because the year
has four parts; and he designated a month January. Saturnus placed
them all among the stars. The others are called the Harbingers of
the Vintage, but Janus rises before them. His star is to be seen
just in front of the feet of Virgo. So Critolaus in the fourth book
of his Phaenomena." ~ Pseudo-Plutarch, Parallela Minora 9


The Toga

"Varro informs us, he himself having been an eye-witness, that in the
temple of Sancus, the wool was still preserved on the distaff and
spindle of Tanaquil, who was also called Caia Cæcilia; and he says
that the royal waved toga, formerly worn by Servius Tullius, and now
in the temple of Fortune, was made by her. Hence was derived the
custom, on the marriage of a young woman, of carrying in the
procession a dressed distaff and a spindle, with the thread arranged
upon it. Tanaquil was the first who wove the straight Tunica Recta,
such as our young people wear with the white Toga Pura; newly-married
women also. Waved garments were at first the most esteemed of all:
after which came into vogue those composed of various colours, the
Tunica Sororiculata. Fenestella informs us, that togae with a smooth
surface, as well as the Phryxian togae, began to be used in the
latter part of the reign of Augustus. Thick stuffs, in the
preparation of which the poppy was used, are of more ancient date,
being mentioned by the poet Lucilius, in his lines on Torquatus. The
Toga Prætexta had its origin among the Etrurians. I find that the
kings first wore the trabea of purple stripes; embroidered garments
are mentioned by Homer, and in this class originated the triumphal
robes." ~ C. Plinius Secundus Maior, Historia Naturalis 8.74


Our thought for today is taken from Seneca, To Nero on Clemency, 1.1

"Today, if the immortal Gods should require a reckoning from me, I am
ready to report the human race intact."
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 59964 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2008-12-16
Subject: Fwd: [moderatorcentral] Join Bug affecting Yahoo! Broadband Partner
Forwarded FYI

----- Forwarded message from gordonst@... -----
Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 18:54:32 -0800
From: Gordon Strause <gordonst@...>
Reply-To: moderatorcentral-owner@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [moderatorcentral] Join Bug affecting Yahoo! Broadband
Partner Users (AT&T, Rogers, BT, and more)
To: moderatorcentral@yahoogroups.com

http://tinyurl.com/partnerjoinbug

There is currently a bug that is preventing Yahoo! Broadband partner
users (which include AT&T/SBCGlobal, Rogers, Verizon, British Telecom,
Telecom New Zealand) from being able to join (or create) groups on the
web. This bug has the same root cause as the similar problem affecting
YMail and Rocketmail users (and the experience for the user is a similar
loop), but the work around to solve the problem is slightly different.

For the moment, these users must first create an alias before they can
create a group. To do so, they should:
- Go to http://manage.members.yahoo.com/FULLEMAILADDRESSHERE
(replacing "FULLEMAILADDRESSHERE" with their full email address. So, for
example, if the user's email address was jerry313@..., they would
enter http://manage.members.yahoo.com/jerry313@... )
- Click on the "View My Profiles" link in the navigation at the top of
the page
- Click the "Create New Public Profile" button
- Once finished, click the "Finished Editing" button

Now these users should be able to join (or create) groups. Meanwhile,
we're working on a fix to make this work around unnecessary. And these
users can also be added to a group (or can subscribe via email by
sending email to GROUPNAME-subscribe@yahoogroups.com) without going
through this process either.

Sorry for the extra hassle for these folks.


CN-EQVIT-MARINVS
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 59965 From: M. OCTAVIVS CORVVS Date: 2008-12-16
Subject: Re: AW: AW: [Nova-Roma] Challenge / Land fund
Salvete omnes,
 
I am proud to inform that we in Sarmatia already purchased the land lot (3000 sq. m) for building the Temple IOM.
 
Valete bene,
 
CRVVS

--- On Sun, 12/14/08, Titus Flavius Aquila <titus.aquila@...> wrote:
From: Titus Flavius Aquila <titus.aquila@...>
Subject: AW: AW: [Nova-Roma] Challenge / Land fund
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Date: Sunday, December 14, 2008, 10:49 PM

Salve Senator Marinus,
 
Yes, I know, thank you and I fully support the idea behind it.
 
Vale bene
Titus Flavius Aquila


Von: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus <gawne@cesmail. net>
An: Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com
Gesendet: Sonntag, den 14. Dezember 2008, 23:55:35 Uhr
Betreff: Re: AW: [Nova-Roma] Challenge / Land fund

Titus Flavius Aquila <titus.aquila@ yahoo.de> writes:

> I fully support the idea of a Land fund

We already have one. If anybody wants to donate money to it, just
send it as you would a tax payment, specifying that the money is for
the land fund.

Vale,

CN-EQVIT-MARINVS


Group: Nova-Roma Message: 59966 From: iulius sabinus Date: 2008-12-16
Subject: Re: Formation of Oppidum Laureatum, Provincia Canada Ulterior - Edic
SALVE ET SALVETE!
 
Excellent news! Congratulations and success to the new oppidum members in their future activities.
I'm glad to see that new addition to an important area of Nova Roma how the local communities development is.
 
VALE ET VALETE,
IVL SABINVS
Oppidum Bucurestium.

"Every individual is the architect of his own fortune" - Appius Claudius


--- On Tue, 12/16/08, Gnaeus Iulius Caesar <gn_iulius_caesar@...> wrote:
From: Gnaeus Iulius Caesar <gn_iulius_caesar@...>
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Formation of Oppidum Laureatum, Provincia Canada Ulterior - Edict 23
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Date: Tuesday, December 16, 2008, 11:02 AM

Edictum Twenty Three

CANADA ULTERIOR EDICT NUMBER TWENTY THREE EX OFFICIO LEGATUS PRO
PROPRAETORIS CANADA ULTERIOR

I, Gnaeus Iulius Caesar, legatus pro praetore of Provincia Canada
Ulterior, in accordance with Section 3.1.1 of the Lex Fabia de
Oppidis et Municipiis, having received a foedus from the following
citizens,

Gaius Vipsanius Agrippa
Quintus Suetonius Paulinus
Vibia Lucretia Camilla
Sexta Iunia Palladia
Publius Aemilius Lepidus

requesting official approval for the formation of an oppidum in the
City of Edmonton, Alberta have examined this request. I find that it
meets the requirements of Section 3.1.2 of the Lex Fabia de Oppidis
et Municipiis. Accordingly by virtue and authority of this edict I
approve their request.

The official name of this community shall be Oppidum Laureatum and
the geographical limits of the Oppidum shall include the cities of
Edmonton, St. Albert, Spruce Grove, Leduc, Fort Saskatchewan and the
surrounding counties of Parkland, Sturgeon, Strathcona and Leduce.

Further, in accordance with Section 3.1.3 of the Lex Fabia de Oppidis
et Municipiis I appoint Gaius Vipsanius Agrippa and Quintus Suetonius
Paulinus to serve as provisional aediles. They are instructed to call
the comitia oppidana of the Oppidum Laureatum and conduct therein an
election for the appointment of two aediles. This election shall be
held within sixty days from today. The appointment of the provisional
aediles shall expire immediately upon the election of the new
aediles.

This edict is effective immediately.

Given under my hand, this 16th day of December, 2008 in the City of
Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.

Cn. Iulius Caesar
Legatus pro praetore
Provincia Canada Ulterior


Group: Nova-Roma Message: 59967 From: Steve Moore Date: 2008-12-16
Subject: Re: Formation of Oppidum Laureatum, Provincia Canada Ulterior - Edic
M. Valerius Potitus omnibus SPD.

On behalf of the citizens and amici of Oppidum Fluminis Gilae, I
extend my warmest congratulations to our fellow citizens to the north
on forming Oppidum Laureatum. This is exciting news, and I wish you
all the best.

So, here's a challenge to the rest of the Republic: if five citizens
in Arizona and five citizens in Alberta can form an oppidum, what's
holding everybody else back?

Io Saturnalia.

Valete.

M. Valerius Potitus
Aedilis, Oppidum Fluminis Gilae
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 59968 From: Publius Memmius Albucius Date: 2008-12-16
Subject: Ludi ianuales results
Aed. Memmius omnibus s.d.

As I lack time and posting from a different pc, please allow me just
giving to you the raw results of our Munera and Athletics given in
the frame of our last curule games, the Ianuales.

Athletics

1. Aoife (GEM owner)- Albata
2. Lucanus (CPDexter owner) - Veneta

Munera

1. Hierocles (CPD) - Veneta
2. Lucanus (CPD) - Veneta

I will give further details next week-end.

The opening ceremony has met no problem, and the Flamen Portunalis
has placed the whole period under good mood.

Valete omnes,


P. Memmius Albucius
aed. cur.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 59969 From: Complutensis Date: 2008-12-16
Subject: Re: Formation of Oppidum Laureatum, Provincia Canada Ulterior - Edic

Comgratulations!

 

M·CVR·COMPLVTENSIS
Oppidum Complutum

Provincia Hispania

-----Mensaje original-----
De: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com [mailto:Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com] En nombre de iulius sabinus
Enviado el: martes, 16 de diciembre de 2008 16:10
Para: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Asunto: Re: [Nova-Roma] Formation of Oppidum Laureatum, Provincia Canada Ulterior - Edict 23

 

SALVE ET SALVETE!

 

Excellent news! Congratulations and success to the new oppidum members in their future activities.

I'm glad to see that new addition to an important area of Nova Roma how the local communities development is.

 

VALE ET VALETE,

IVL SABINVS

Oppidum Bucurestium.

"Every individual is the architect of his own fortune" - Appius Claudius



--- On Tue, 12/16/08, Gnaeus Iulius Caesar <gn_iulius_caesar@ yahoo.com> wrote:

From: Gnaeus Iulius Caesar <gn_iulius_caesar@ yahoo.com>
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Formation of Oppidum Laureatum, Provincia Canada Ulterior - Edict 23
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com
Date: Tuesday, December 16, 2008, 11:02 AM

Edictum Twenty Three

CANADA ULTERIOR EDICT NUMBER TWENTY THREE EX OFFICIO LEGATUS PRO
PROPRAETORIS CANADA ULTERIOR

I, Gnaeus Iulius Caesar, legatus pro praetore of Provincia Canada
Ulterior, in accordance with Section 3.1.1 of the Lex Fabia de
Oppidis et Municipiis, having received a foedus from the following
citizens,

Gaius Vipsanius Agrippa
Quintus Suetonius Paulinus
Vibia Lucretia Camilla
Sexta Iunia Palladia
Publius Aemilius Lepidus

requesting official approval for the formation of an oppidum in the
City of Edmonton, Alberta have examined this request. I find that it
meets the requirements of Section 3.1.2 of the Lex Fabia de Oppidis
et Municipiis. Accordingly by virtue and authority of this edict I
approve their request.

The official name of this community shall be Oppidum Laureatum and
the geographical limits of the Oppidum shall include the cities of
Edmonton, St. Albert, Spruce Grove, Leduc, Fort Saskatchewan and the
surrounding counties of Parkland, Sturgeon, Strathcona and Leduce.

Further, in accordance with Section 3.1.3 of the Lex Fabia de Oppidis
et Municipiis I appoint Gaius Vipsanius Agrippa and Quintus Suetonius
Paulinus to serve as provisional aediles. They are instructed to call
the comitia oppidana of the Oppidum Laureatum and conduct therein an
election for the appointment of two aediles. This election shall be
held within sixty days from today. The appointment of the provisional
aediles shall expire immediately upon the election of the new
aediles.

This edict is effective immediately.

Given under my hand, this 16th day of December, 2008 in the City of
Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.

Cn. Iulius Caesar
Legatus pro praetore
Provincia Canada Ulterior

 

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 59970 From: M•IVL•SEVERVS Date: 2008-12-16
Subject: Re: AW: AW: [Nova-Roma] Challenge / Land fund
Severus Corvo omnibusque sal.
 
Congratulations, amice!
As I have always said, here and in other forums: Sarmatia Provincia is a bright example for all Nova Romans!
 
Optime vale et tibi gratulor!

M•IVL•SEVERVS

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 59971 From: Christer Edling Date: 2008-12-16
Subject: Re: Formation of Oppidum Laureatum, Provincia Canada Ulterior - Edic
Salvete all citizens in Canada Ulterior and Oppidum Laureatum!

It is agreat joy for me as the Consul who lead the work on "Lex Fabia
de Oppidis et Municipiis" to see it used once again. AS I am a great
supporter of building local chapters in Nova roma I enjoy this step
even more. Congratulations!

****************

16 dec 2008 kl. 11.02 skrev Gnaeus Iulius Caesar:

Edictum Twenty Three

CANADA ULTERIOR EDICT NUMBER TWENTY THREE EX OFFICIO LEGATUS PRO
PROPRAETORIS CANADA ULTERIOR

I, Gnaeus Iulius Caesar, legatus pro praetore of Provincia Canada
Ulterior, in accordance with Section 3.1.1 of the Lex Fabia de
Oppidis et Municipiis, having received a foedus from the following
citizens,

Gaius Vipsanius Agrippa
Quintus Suetonius Paulinus
Vibia Lucretia Camilla
Sexta Iunia Palladia
Publius Aemilius Lepidus

requesting official approval for the formation of an oppidum in the
City of Edmonton, Alberta have examined this request. I find that it
meets the requirements of Section 3.1.2 of the Lex Fabia de Oppidis
et Municipiis. Accordingly by virtue and authority of this edict I
approve their request.

The official name of this community shall be Oppidum Laureatum and
the geographical limits of the Oppidum shall include the cities of
Edmonton, St. Albert, Spruce Grove, Leduc, Fort Saskatchewan and the
surrounding counties of Parkland, Sturgeon, Strathcona and Leduce.

Further, in accordance with Section 3.1.3 of the Lex Fabia de Oppidis
et Municipiis I appoint Gaius Vipsanius Agrippa and Quintus Suetonius
Paulinus to serve as provisional aediles. They are instructed to call
the comitia oppidana of the Oppidum Laureatum and conduct therein an
election for the appointment of two aediles. This election shall be
held within sixty days from today. The appointment of the provisional
aediles shall expire immediately upon the election of the new
aediles.

This edict is effective immediately.

Given under my hand, this 16th day of December, 2008 in the City of
Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.

Cn. Iulius Caesar
Legatus pro praetore
Provincia Canada Ulterior



------------------------------------

Yahoo! Groups Links




*****************
Vale

Caeso Fabius Buteo Quintilianus

Princeps Senatus et Flamen Palatualis
Civis Romanus sum
http://www.novaroma.org/nr/Main_Page
************************************************
Aut inveniam viam aut faciam
"I'll either find a way or make one"
************************************************
Dignitas, Iustitia, Fidelitas et Pietas
Dignity, Justice, Loyalty and Dutifulness
************************************************
Mons Palatinus, Clivus Victoriae
Palatine Hill, Incline of Victoriae
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 59972 From: Gens Iulia Date: 2008-12-16
Subject: Re: AW: AW: [Nova-Roma] Challenge / Land fund
Severus Corvo omnibusque sal
Hear! Hear!.
We cannot but echoe these words!!.
Optima Vale!.
Gaia Iulia Agrippa.
Decimus Cassius Lupus.
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2008 4:57 PM
Subject: Re: AW: AW: [Nova-Roma] Challenge / Land fund

Severus Corvo omnibusque sal.
 
Congratulations, amice!
As I have always said, here and in other forums: Sarmatia Provincia is a bright example for all Nova Romans!
 
Optime vale et tibi gratulor!

M•IVL•SEVERVS


No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG.
Version: 7.5.552 / Virus Database: 270.9.18/1851 - Release Date: 16/12/08 08:53 a.m.

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 59973 From: Gens Iulia Date: 2008-12-16
Subject: Fw: AW: AW: [Nova-Roma] Challenge / Land fund
Sorry: just in a hurry.
Here it goes as it should
 
Agrippa et Lupus Severo Corvo Omnibusque sal
Hear! Hear!.
We cannot but echoe these words!!.
Optima Vale!.
Gaia Iulia Agrippa.
Decimus Cassius Lupus
 
----- Original Message -----
From: Gens Iulia
Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2008 6:23 PM
Subject: Re: AW: AW: [Nova-Roma] Challenge / Land fund

Severus Corvo omnibusque sal
Hear! Hear!.
We cannot but echoe these words!!.
Optima Vale!.
Gaia Iulia Agrippa.
Decimus Cassius Lupus.
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2008 4:57 PM
Subject: Re: AW: AW: [Nova-Roma] Challenge / Land fund

Severus Corvo omnibusque sal.
 
Congratulations, amice!
As I have always said, here and in other forums: Sarmatia Provincia is a bright example for all Nova Romans!
 
Optime vale et tibi gratulor!

M•IVL•SEVERVS


No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG.
Version: 7.5.552 / Virus Database: 270.9.18/1851 - Release Date: 16/12/08 08:53 a.m.

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 59974 From: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com Date: 2008-12-16
Subject: SATVRNALIA, 12/17/2008, 12:00 am
Reminder from:   Nova-Roma Yahoo! Group
 
Title:   SATVRNALIA
 
Date:   Wednesday December 17, 2008
Time:   All Day
Repeats:   This event repeats every year.
Notes:   Io Saturnalia!!

"...but suddenly shouted with one accord the well-known cry, 'Io Saturnalia'... " Cassius Dio LX.19.3

Today is the first day of Saturnalia!
 
Copyright © 2008  Yahoo! Inc. All Rights Reserved | Terms of Service | Privacy Policy
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 59975 From: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com Date: 2008-12-16
Subject: ante diem XVI Kalendas Ianuarias - Saturnalia, 12/17/2008, 12:00 am
Reminder from:   Nova-Roma Yahoo! Group
 
Title:   ante diem XVI Kalendas Ianuarias - Saturnalia
 
Date:   Wednesday December 17, 2008
Time:   All Day
Repeats:   This event repeats every year.
Notes:   http://novaroma.org/nr/Saturnalia

http://novaroma.org/nr/Saturnalia_(Nova_Roma)
 
Copyright © 2008  Yahoo! Inc. All Rights Reserved | Terms of Service | Privacy Policy
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 59976 From: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com Date: 2008-12-16
Subject: Nova Roma has Amazon shops!, 12/17/2008, 12:00 am
Reminder from:   Nova-Roma Yahoo! Group
 
Title:   Nova Roma has Amazon shops!
 
Date:   Wednesday December 17, 2008
Time:   All Day
Repeats:   This event repeats every Monday, Wednesday, and Friday until Wednesday December 31, 2008.
Notes:   Nova Roma now has Amazon shops! Buy through these shops and a portion of your price is returned to Nova Roma. See http://www.novaroma.org/nr/Amazon_affiliate for links.
 
Copyright © 2008  Yahoo! Inc. All Rights Reserved | Terms of Service | Privacy Policy
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 59977 From: Chantal Gaudiano Date: 2008-12-16
Subject: File - EDICTUM DE SERMONE
P. Corva omnibus--

If I spot a grammatical error in an official pronouncement or in a lex on the website, to whose attention should it be brought?

And can minor grammatical corrections to things be made without causing a lot of difficulty, or is it more trouble than it's worth?

I would like to volunteer to proofread English official text for NR, but I don't want to be an annoyance. (g)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 59978 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2008-12-16
Subject: Re: File - EDICTUM DE SERMONE
Salve Paulla Corva,

You should bring the matter to the attention of the Praetors, who are
the owners of the Nova-Roma list. For anything posted to the
Nova-Roma list, you can write to Nova-Roma-owner at yahoogroups dot com.

Vale,

CN-EQVIT-MARINVS

Chantal Gaudiano <aerdensrw@...> writes:

> P. Corva omnibus--
>
> If I spot a grammatical error in an official pronouncement or in a
> lex on the website, to whose attention should it be brought?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 59979 From: Titus Flavius Aquila Date: 2008-12-17
Subject: Join the sodalitas proDIIS A Temple for the Gods in Rome today !

 Salvete Quirites !

 

Up to date 18 citizens - among them the most noble and honourable ones - have joined the sodalitas to work on a project the world has not seen for over 1600 years. To build a Temple for the Roman Gods in Rome .

 

A Temple every citizen will be able to visit, where to participate or watch the religious rites, thus to see and to feel the results of a project fully owned by Nova Roma , if approved by the Senate in February 2762 AUC. The Collegium is currently working on the business & project plan for presenting it to the patres conscripti and hopefully receive the official approval.

 

Thus providing a real benefit to all citizens ! To all of Nova Roma !

 

As we have received this question already several times, this temple will be a republican Temple only Roman Gods will be worshipped , no foreign cults.

 

All members will be actively involved in the project and in the decision making.Very soon we will discuss the temple baseline and the promoting of the project.

 

For joining the sodalitas please send a short statement with your Roman name, the provincia you are residing in, and your email contact address to the Collegium of the sodalitas.

 

If you would like to donate please find below the necessary information.

 

The following PayPal account has been set-up for donations to the sodalitas proDIIS.

 

If you would like to donate to the sodalitas account please transfer your money via PayPal to the following account:

 

prodiis@...

 

Please state as keyword Donation for the Temple

 

Thank you very much

 

May the eternal Gods guard you all !

 

Titus Flavius Aquila

Collegium sodalitas proDIIS

 

 


Group: Nova-Roma Message: 59980 From: M. OCTAVIVS CORVVS Date: 2008-12-17
Subject: Re: Fw: AW: AW: [Nova-Roma] Challenge / Land fund
Salvete omnes,
 
thank you for your warm words, my fellow new romans. You are too kind for us, Sarmatians.
Sarmatia was one of the latest provinces of Nova Roma to formate, so all the provinces of New Rome will be like elder sisters for Sarmatia.
Like you, dear friend Sevrus, are and will always be a tutor and a guide for me.
Purchasing of a lot is the only first step on the long path of reviving Religio Romana here, in Sarmatia, and throughout all the New Rome. And the main feelings we have - concern and responsibility.
For They are watching... :)
 
Valete optime,
 
CORVVS

--- On Tue, 12/16/08, Gens Iulia <maite_cat@...> wrote:
From: Gens Iulia <maite_cat@...>
Subject: Fw: AW: AW: [Nova-Roma] Challenge / Land fund
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Date: Tuesday, December 16, 2008, 1:26 PM

Sorry: just in a hurry.
Here it goes as it should
 
Agrippa et Lupus Severo Corvo Omnibusque sal
Hear! Hear!.
We cannot but echoe these words!!.
Optima Vale!.
Gaia Iulia Agrippa.
Decimus Cassius Lupus
 
----- Original Message -----
From: Gens Iulia
Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2008 6:23 PM
Subject: Re: AW: AW: [Nova-Roma] Challenge / Land fund

Severus Corvo omnibusque sal
Hear! Hear!.
We cannot but echoe these words!!.
Optima Vale!.
Gaia Iulia Agrippa.
Decimus Cassius Lupus.
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2008 4:57 PM
Subject: Re: AW: AW: [Nova-Roma] Challenge / Land fund

Severus Corvo omnibusque sal.
 
Congratulations, amice!
As I have always said, here and in other forums: Sarmatia Provincia is a bright example for all Nova Romans!
 
Optime vale et tibi gratulor!

M•IVL•SEVERVS


No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG.
Version: 7.5.552 / Virus Database: 270.9.18/1851 - Release Date: 16/12/08 08:53 a.m.

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 59981 From: marcushoratius Date: 2008-12-17
Subject: a. d. XVI Kalendas Ianuaris: SATURNALIA
M. Moravius Piscinus Horatianus Quiritibus et omnibus salutem
plurimam dicit: Io Saturnalia! Io Triumphe!

Hodie est ante diem XVI Kalendas Ianuaras; haec dies nefastus est:
Saturnalia: feriae Saturno ad forum

"How well lived folk in olden days when Saturn was the King, before
the earth was opened out for distant travel! Not as yet had the pine-
tree learned to scorn the blue sea wave or offered the spreading sail
to belly before the wind; nor seeking gain in unlnown lands, had the
vagrant seaman loaded his bark with foreign wares. That was a time
when the sturdy bull had not bent his neck to the yoke, nor the tamed
hores champed the bit. No house had doors; no stone was planted on
the land to set fixed boundaries to men's estates. The very oaks
gave honey; and with milky udders came the ewes unbidden to meet the
carefree swain. Then were no marshaled hosts, no lust for blood, no
battles, no swords had been forged by the cruel armourer's ruthless
skill." ~ Albius Tibullus 1.3.35-48

AUC 256 / 497 BCE: Origin of Saturnalia

"During the consulship of A. Sempronius and M. Minucius an altar was
dedicated to Saturn and the festival of the Saturnalia instituted." ~
Titus Livius 2.21

AUC 536 / 217 BCE: Origin of the lecisternium of Saturnus and the
convivium

"A decree was passed that to avert the evils which portents forebode,
sacrifices should be offered, the victims to be both full-grown
animals and sucklings, and also that special intercessions should be
made at all the shrines for three days. What other ceremonial was
necessary was to be carried out in accordance with the instructions
of the decemvirs after they had inspected the Sibylline Oracles and
ascertained the will of the Gods. On their advice it was decreed that
the first votive offering should be made to Jupiter in the shape of a
golden thunderbolt weighing fifty pounds, gifts of silver to Juno and
Minerva, and sacrifices of full-grown victims to Queen Juno on the
Aventine and Juno Sospita at Lanuvium, whilst the matrons were to
contribute according to their means and bear their gift to Queen Juno
on the Aventine. A lectisternium was to be held, and even the
freedwomen were to contribute what they could for a gift to the
temple of Feronia. When these instructions had been carried out the
decemvirs sacrificed full-grown victims in the forum at Ardea, and
finally in the middle of December there was a sacrifice at the temple
precinct of Saturn, a lectisternium was ordered, the senators
prepared the couch, and a public banquet (convivium) held. For a day
and a night the cry of the Saturnalia resounded through the City, and
the people were ordered to make that day a festival and observe it as
such forever." ~ Titus Livius 22.1.19

Plutarch, Roman Questions 11: "Why do they sacrifice to Saturnus with
the head uncovered?

"Is it because Aeneas instituted the custom of covering the head, and
the sacrifice to Saturnus dates from long before that time? Or is it
that they cover the head before the heavenly deities, but they
consider Saturnus a God whose realm is beneath the earth? Or is it
that no part of Truth is covered or overshadowed, and the Romans
consider Saturnus Father of Truth?"

The first day of Saturnalia begins as a solemn religious occasion
with a morning sacrifice followed later in the day with a sacramental
meal. The sacrifice, possibly a pig, was performed in ritus Graecus
(Festus-Paul. Lindsay p.274.29-32). Violets, storax, and costus
were used as incense for Him. Senators and the Equites wore togae
during the lectisternium and the sacrifice that followed, but laid
these aside during the public convivium. In donning their special
togae praetexta for Senators, and the red cloaks of those Equites
given public horses, they displayed the echelons of Roman society. In
putting aside their togae they removed the symbols of their rank, all
Roman citizens joined together in equality as was assumed was their
condition during the rule of Saturnus in the Golden Age. From the
banquet tables they would then go throughout the City with shouts:

IO TRIUMPHE! IO SATURNALIA!


AUC 822 / 69 CE: The Army of Vitellius at Narnia in Etruria,
survivors of the Second Battle of Cremona, went over to the Flavians.


A thought for today comes to us from L. Annaeus Seneca, Epistle 19:

"Apply this maxim of the wise: consider that it is more important who
receives a thing, than what it is he receives."
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 59982 From: Gnaeus Iulius Caesar Date: 2008-12-17
Subject: Formation of Oppidum Laureatum, Provincia Canada Ulterior - Edict 23
Edictum Twenty Three

CANADA ULTERIOR EDICT NUMBER TWENTY THREE
EX OFFICIO LEGATUS PRO PRAETORIS CANADA ULTERIOR

I, Gnaeus Iulius Caesar, legatus pro praetore of Provincia Canada
Ulterior, in accordance with Section 3.1.1 of the Lex Fabia de
Oppidis et Municipiis, having received a foedus from the following
citizens,

Gaius Vipsanius Agrippa
Quintus Suetonius Paulinus
Vibia Lucretia Camilla
Sexta Iunia Palladia
Publius Aemilius Lepidus

requesting official approval for the formation of an oppidum in the
City of Edmonton, Alberta have examined this request. I find that it
meets the requirements of Section 3.1.2 of the Lex Fabia de Oppidis
et Municipiis. Accordingly by virtue and authority of this edict I
approve their request.

The official name of this community shall be Oppidum Laureatum and
the geographical limits of the Oppidum shall include the cities of
Edmonton, St. Albert, Spruce Grove, Leduc, Fort Saskatchewan and the
surrounding counties of Parkland, Sturgeon, Strathcona and Leduce.

Further, in accordance with Section 3.1.3 of the Lex Fabia de Oppidis
et Municipiis I appoint Gaius Vipsanius Agrippa and Quintus Suetonius
Paulinus to serve as provisional aediles. They are instructed to call
the comitia oppidana of the Oppidum Laureatum and conduct therein an
election for the appointment of two aediles. This election shall be
held within sixty days from today. The appointment of the provisional
aediles shall expire immediately upon the election of the new
aediles.

This edict is effective immediately.

Given under my hand, this 16th day of December, 2008 in the City of
Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.

Cn. Iulius Caesar
Legatus pro praetore
Provincia Canada Ulterior
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 59983 From: Gaius Petronius Dexter Date: 2008-12-17
Subject: Today in Rome: Dec 17, 2008.
C. Petronius Dexter omnibus Quiritibus s.p.d.,
 
Today in Rome :
 
(Julian day : 2 454 818).
 
A. d. XVI Kalendas Ianuarias
MMDCCLXII anno Vrbis conditae.
Coss. M. Moravio T. Iulio.
 
Day of the week : Mercurii dies (Wednesday).
 
Lunaris dies: XXI.
Nundinal letter : G.
 
Hora ortus Solis : 07:31.
Hora occasus Solis : 16:40.
Temp. Min. : 5° C.
Temp. Max. : 13° C.
Wind on Rome : 21 Km/h.
Humidity: 60%.
Weather: More sun than clouds. Cool.
 
Horae diei :
 
I: 07:31 - 08:15 Saturni hora.
II: 08:15 - 09:00 Iovis hora.
III: 09:00 - 09:45 Martis hora.
IV: 09:45 - 10:30 Solis hora.
V: 10:30 - 11:15 Veneris hora.
VI: 11:15 - 12:00 Mercurii hora.
VII: 12:00 - 12:46 Lunae hora.
VIII: 12:46 - 13:33 Saturni hora.
IX: 13:33 - 14:20 Iovis hora.
X: 14:20 - 15:06 Martis hora.
XI: 15:06 - 15:53 Solis hora.
XII: 15:53 - 16:40 Veneris hora.
 

Horae noctis :
 
I: 16:40 - 17:53 Mercurii hora.
II: 17:53 - 19:06 Lunae hora.
III: 19:06 - 20:20 Saturni hora.
IV: 20:20 - 21:33 Iovis hora.
V: 21:33 - 22:46 Martis hora.
VI: 22:46 - 00:00 Solis hora.
VII: 00:00 - 01:15 Veneris hora.
VIII: 01:15 - 02:30 Mercurii hora.
IX: 02:30 - 03:46 Lunae hora.
X: 03:46 - 05:01 Saturni hora.
XI: 05:01 - 06:16 Iovis hora.
XII: 06:16 - 07:32 Martis hora.
 

Valete.
 
C. Petronius Dexter.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 59984 From: philippe cardon Date: 2008-12-17
Subject: Re: Fw: AW: AW: [Nova-Roma] Challenge / Land fund
as I previousy announced I shall be ready from 1st of april on to offer th possibility for groups of new Romans or other pagans to come by me and camp; eat, meet andworship (sleeping habilities another way than camping are for later)
 
breakfasts and meals are made by us
 
price 20€ per da and per personn
 
Varro
 
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 59985 From: Robert Levee Date: 2008-12-17
Subject: Re: Join the sodalitas proDIIS A Temple for the Gods in Rome today !
Salve et Salvete,

Fellow citizens,I think the latest string of conversation is wonderful with many possibilities coming to light, from many areas of the Republic.

I am very much in support of the idea of citizens joining together in their districts, to work on projects in their area, if not just for the sake of Roman fellowship but. to gather ideas together on expanding efforts, to promote Roman values in the community.

Beyond this, we have a great organization that has been established within Nova Roma to promote a Temple for The Roman Gods et Goddessess in the confines of Rome itself.This will be a great boon to Nova Roma as no other one project could accomplish,That being the placing of the Religeo Romana on the world stage once again.

We have here a great opportunity to bring forth the greatest message of religious statement to the people of the world to have occured in 2,000 years, in our lifetimes.

Much talk in recent days has been given to change and historical change at that.Let us practice carpe diem,to sieze the day now to enbrace these ideals, for not only a better future for Nova Roma, but also all of humankind.

I call on all who can support in any way you can, whether it be a dollar or a Euro to help build the Temple For The Gods in Rome.

Vale et Valete,
For The Gods!
Ap.Galerius Aurelianus
Tribune of the Plebs

--- On Wed, 12/17/08, Titus Flavius Aquila <titus.aquila@...> wrote:

> From: Titus Flavius Aquila <titus.aquila@...>
> Subject: [Nova-Roma] Join the sodalitas proDIIS A Temple for the Gods in Rome today !
> To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> Date: Wednesday, December 17, 2008, 4:37 AM
>  Salvete Quirites !
>  
> Up to date 18 citizens - among them the most noble and
> honourable ones - have joined the sodalitas to work on a
> project the world has not seen for over 1600 years. To build
> a Temple for the Roman Gods in Rome.
>  
> A Temple every citizen will be able to visit, where to
> participate or watch the religious rites, thus to see and
> to feel the results of a project fully owned by Nova Roma ,
> if approved by the Senate in February 2762 AUC. The
> Collegium is currently working on the business & project
> plan for presenting it to the patres conscripti and
> hopefully receive the official approval.
>  
> Thus providing a real benefit to all citizens ! To all of
> Nova Roma !
>  
> As we have received this question already several times,
> this temple will be a republican Temple only Roman Gods
> will be worshipped , no foreign cults.
>  
> All members will be actively involved in the project and in
> the decision making.Very soon we will discuss the temple
> baseline and the promoting of the project.
>  
> For joining the sodalitas please send a short statement
> with your Roman name, the provincia you are residing in, and
> your email contact address to the Collegium of the
> sodalitas.
>  
> If you would like to donate please find below the necessary
> information.
>  
> The following PayPal account has been set-up for donations
> to the sodalitas proDIIS.
>  
> If you would like to donate to the sodalitas account please
> transfer your money via PayPal to the following account:
>  
> prodiis@...
>  
> Please state as keyword Donation for the Temple
>  
> Thank you very much
>  
> May the eternal Gods guard you all !
>  
> Titus Flavius Aquila
> Collegium sodalitas proDIIS
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 59986 From: Colin Cunningham Date: 2008-12-17
Subject: Re: Join the sodalitas proDIIS A Temple for the Gods in Rome today !
Salvete!

I am pleased by this and would like to join, but I do not know where to request to join!  If someone could post a link or an email address, that would be great!

Valete,

C Fulvius Severus

On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 9:37 AM, Robert Levee <galerius_of_rome@...> wrote:

Salve et Salvete,

Fellow citizens,I think the latest string of conversation is wonderful with many possibilities coming to light, from many areas of the Republic.

I am very much in support of the idea of citizens joining together in their districts, to work on projects in their area, if not just for the sake of Roman fellowship but. to gather ideas together on expanding efforts, to promote Roman values in the community.

Beyond this, we have a great organization that has been established within Nova Roma to promote a Temple for The Roman Gods et Goddessess in the confines of Rome itself.This will be a great boon to Nova Roma as no other one project could accomplish,That being the placing of the Religeo Romana on the world stage once again.

We have here a great opportunity to bring forth the greatest message of religious statement to the people of the world to have occured in 2,000 years, in our lifetimes.

Much talk in recent days has been given to change and historical change at that.Let us practice carpe diem,to sieze the day now to enbrace these ideals, for not only a better future for Nova Roma, but also all of humankind.

I call on all who can support in any way you can, whether it be a dollar or a Euro to help build the Temple For The Gods in Rome.

Vale et Valete,
For The Gods!
Ap.Galerius Aurelianus
Tribune of the Plebs

--- On Wed, 12/17/08, Titus Flavius Aquila <titus.aquila@...> wrote:

> From: Titus Flavius Aquila <titus.aquila@...>
> Subject: [Nova-Roma] Join the sodalitas proDIIS A Temple for the Gods in Rome today !
> To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> Date: Wednesday, December 17, 2008, 4:37 AM


>  Salvete Quirites !
>  
> Up to date 18 citizens - among them the most noble and
> honourable ones - have joined the sodalitas to work on a
> project the world has not seen for over 1600 years. To build
> a Temple for the Roman Gods in Rome.
>  
> A Temple every citizen will be able to visit, where to
> participate or watch the religious rites, thus to see and
> to feel the results of a project fully owned by Nova Roma ,
> if approved by the Senate in February 2762 AUC. The
> Collegium is currently working on the business & project
> plan for presenting it to the patres conscripti and
> hopefully receive the official approval.
>  
> Thus providing a real benefit to all citizens ! To all of
> Nova Roma !
>  
> As we have received this question already several times,
> this temple will be a republican Temple only Roman Gods
> will be worshipped , no foreign cults.
>  
> All members will be actively involved in the project and in
> the decision making.Very soon we will discuss the temple
> baseline and the promoting of the project.
>  
> For joining the sodalitas please send a short statement
> with your Roman name, the provincia you are residing in, and
> your email contact address to the Collegium of the
> sodalitas.
>  
> If you would like to donate please find below the necessary
> information.
>  
> The following PayPal account has been set-up for donations
> to the sodalitas proDIIS.
>  
> If you would like to donate to the sodalitas account please
> transfer your money via PayPal to the following account:
>  
> prodiis@...
>  
> Please state as keyword Donation for the Temple
>  
> Thank you very much
>  
> May the eternal Gods guard you all !
>  
> Titus Flavius Aquila
> Collegium sodalitas proDIIS


Group: Nova-Roma Message: 59987 From: Robert Levee Date: 2008-12-17
Subject: Re: Join the sodalitas proDIIS A Temple for the Gods in Rome today !
Salve,To subscribe please try this address.
Subscribe: SodalitasPRODIIS-NR-subscribe@yahoogroups.com



Vale,
Ap.Galerius Aurelianus
Tribune of The Plebs


--- On Wed, 12/17/08, Colin Cunningham <talimar1@...> wrote:

> From: Colin Cunningham <talimar1@...>
> Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Join the sodalitas proDIIS A Temple for the Gods in Rome today !
> To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> Date: Wednesday, December 17, 2008, 11:37 AM
> Salvete!
> I am pleased by this and would like to join, but I do not
> know where to
> request to join! If someone could post a link or an email
> address, that
> would be great!
>
> Valete,
>
> C Fulvius Severus
>
> On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 9:37 AM, Robert Levee
> <galerius_of_rome@...>wrote:
>
> > Salve et Salvete,
> >
> > Fellow citizens,I think the latest string of
> conversation is wonderful with
> > many possibilities coming to light, from many areas of
> the Republic.
> >
> > I am very much in support of the idea of citizens
> joining together in their
> > districts, to work on projects in their area, if not
> just for the sake of
> > Roman fellowship but. to gather ideas together on
> expanding efforts, to
> > promote Roman values in the community.
> >
> > Beyond this, we have a great organization that has
> been established within
> > Nova Roma to promote a Temple for The Roman Gods et
> Goddessess in the
> > confines of Rome itself.This will be a great boon to
> Nova Roma as no other
> > one project could accomplish,That being the placing of
> the Religeo Romana on
> > the world stage once again.
> >
> > We have here a great opportunity to bring forth the
> greatest message of
> > religious statement to the people of the world to have
> occured in 2,000
> > years, in our lifetimes.
> >
> > Much talk in recent days has been given to change and
> historical change at
> > that.Let us practice carpe diem,to sieze the day now
> to enbrace these
> > ideals, for not only a better future for Nova Roma,
> but also all of
> > humankind.
> >
> > I call on all who can support in any way you can,
> whether it be a dollar or
> > a Euro to help build the Temple For The Gods in Rome.
> >
> > Vale et Valete,
> > For The Gods!
> > Ap.Galerius Aurelianus
> > Tribune of the Plebs
> >
> > --- On Wed, 12/17/08, Titus Flavius Aquila
> <titus.aquila@...<titus.aquila%40yahoo.de>>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > From: Titus Flavius Aquila
> <titus.aquila@...<titus.aquila%40yahoo.de>
> > >
> > > Subject: [Nova-Roma] Join the sodalitas proDIIS A
> Temple for the Gods in
> > Rome today !
> > > To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> <Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com>
> > > Date: Wednesday, December 17, 2008, 4:37 AM
> >
> > > Salvete Quirites !
> > >
> > > Up to date 18 citizens - among them the most
> noble and
> > > honourable ones - have joined the sodalitas to
> work on a
> > > project the world has not seen for over 1600
> years. To build
> > > a Temple for the Roman Gods in Rome.
> > >
> > > A Temple every citizen will be able to visit,
> where to
> > > participate or watch the religious rites, thus to
> see and
> > > to feel the results of a project fully owned by
> Nova Roma ,
> > > if approved by the Senate in February 2762 AUC.
> The
> > > Collegium is currently working on the business
> & project
> > > plan for presenting it to the patres conscripti
> and
> > > hopefully receive the official approval.
> > >
> > > Thus providing a real benefit to all citizens !
> To all of
> > > Nova Roma !
> > >
> > > As we have received this question already several
> times,
> > > this temple will be a republican Temple only
> Roman Gods
> > > will be worshipped , no foreign cults.
> > >
> > > All members will be actively involved in the
> project and in
> > > the decision making.Very soon we will discuss the
> temple
> > > baseline and the promoting of the project.
> > >
> > > For joining the sodalitas please send a short
> statement
> > > with your Roman name, the provincia you are
> residing in, and
> > > your email contact address to the Collegium of
> the
> > > sodalitas.
> > >
> > > If you would like to donate please find below the
> necessary
> > > information.
> > >
> > > The following PayPal account has been set-up for
> donations
> > > to the sodalitas proDIIS.
> > >
> > > If you would like to donate to the sodalitas
> account please
> > > transfer your money via PayPal to the following
> account:
> > >
> > > prodiis@... <prodiis%40yahoo.de>
> > >
> > > Please state as keyword Donation for the Temple
> > >
> > > Thank you very much
> > >
> > > May the eternal Gods guard you all !
> > >
> > > Titus Flavius Aquila
> > > Collegium sodalitas proDIIS
> >
> >
> >
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 59988 From: L Julia Aquila Date: 2008-12-17
Subject: Re: Saturnalia December 17th
Aquila Maiori Omnibusque

Io Saturnalia!

A wonderful idea to share an epigram in Latin and one's native
language!

2.85
Vimine clausa levi niveae custodia coctae,
Hoc tibi Saturni tempore munus erit.
Dona quod aestatis misi tibi mense Decembri,
Si quereris, rasam tu mihi mitte togam.

A flask, enclosed in light wickerwork for water that's been boiled
then iced - this will be my gift to you at the time of Saturnalia. If
you complain that I've sent you a summer gift in the month of
December, then, for your part, send me a shorn toga.

Valete!

Julia Aquila



-- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Maior" <rory12001@...> wrote:
>
> Maior omnibus spd;
>
>
> So amici here is a link to Martial's epigrams:
> http://www.txclassics.org/saturnaliamartial.htm
>
> let's post an epigram in Latin and have the provincial language
> translation: French, Italian, Russian, German, English.
> Celebrate Saturnalia Novi Romani!
> optime valete
> M. Hortensia Maior
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 59989 From: L Julia Aquila Date: 2008-12-17
Subject: Io Saturnalia!

 

L Julia Aquila Omnibus S.P.D

 

Gaudéte!    Io Saturnalia!

 

Sit Saturnalia laeta! Sint tibi omnia felicia et fausta. 

Fortuna tecum sit per Annum Novum!

 

Rejoice! Io Saturnalia!

 

May it be a happy Saturnalia! May you have everything lucky & auspicious.

May Fortune be with you through the New Year!

 

My family, like those of yours, has its own traditions for the festival. The daily gifting of one small thoughtful and useful present each day is a loving reminder of the season culminating with a few extra on the last day. This holiday has many variations because the traditions handed down are dependant on so many variables and often are reminiscent of many eras. In addition, in the past, they blended in to some degree on the surface with other Holidays, for example Chanukah (a little later this year) and Christmas. This only served to make our Saturnalia even richer as we shared with our friends of different religions the merriment and joy but also the great sense of the sacred and this we all have in common no matter what our beliefs are. And the tales and lore of different cultures and religions enriched us all. The games, the decorations, the lights and candles delighted us all. Every evening meal was a little special and often attended by guests of our brotherhood and those in their employ with special feasts on such days as the bacchanalia of the Solstice; 20th century Roman feasts. The feasts extended to the eve of the 24th and day of the 25th; on the 25th we awoke just knowing this great elf called Santa Claus brought gifts to us in celebration of Dies Natalis Solis Invicti, the birth of the unconquered sun, brought forward from my strong paternal military lineage.

Meus Amicus, this is my small and humble offering for you enjoyment and it is my sincerest wish that this season brings you peace, prosperity and love for you and your family.

Oh Saturn, oldest and noblest king, hear my sincerest prayer for your Nova Roman people for peace, prosperity and love but also sow your generative seed for the strength, fortitude and understanding to make great strides in progress for growth within the Res publica.

 

Pax hominibus bonae voluntátis!

Optimé valéte in cúráte deorum

 

Julia Aquila

 

 

 

 

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 59990 From: Titus Flavius Aquila Date: 2008-12-17
Subject: AW: [Nova-Roma] Join the sodalitas proDIIS A Temple for the Gods in
Salvete Quirites,
 
to join the sodalitas proDIIS , you will need to send currently an email to an Collegium member - for example myself - and state :
 
  • your wish to join the sodalitas,
  • your full Roman name,
  • your provincia you are residing in,
  • your email address where you could be contacted at.
 
The Collegium will then take care of your application and after reviewing it , will sent you an invite to the Sodalitas proDIIS Main List.
 
-----
 
As soon as our Website has been finalized and officially published , you will find a Join us button on the Home page to request membership.
 
Optime valete
Titus Flavius Aquila


Von: Robert Levee <galerius_of_rome@...>
An: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Gesendet: Mittwoch, den 17. Dezember 2008, 20:22:05 Uhr
Betreff: Re: [Nova-Roma] Join the sodalitas proDIIS A Temple for the Gods in Rome today !

Salve,To subscribe please try this address.
Subscribe: SodalitasPRODIIS- NR-subscribe@ yahoogroups. com


Vale,
Ap.Galerius Aurelianus
Tribune of The Plebs

--- On Wed, 12/17/08, Colin Cunningham <talimar1@gmail. com> wrote:

> From: Colin Cunningham <talimar1@gmail. com>
> Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Join the sodalitas proDIIS A Temple for the Gods in Rome today !
> To: Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com
> Date: Wednesday, December 17, 2008, 11:37 AM
> Salvete!
> I am pleased by this and would like to join, but I do not
> know where to
> request to join! If someone could post a link or an email
> address, that
> would be great!
>
> Valete,
>
> C Fulvius Severus
>
> On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 9:37 AM, Robert Levee
> <galerius_of_ rome@yahoo. com>wrote:
>
> > Salve et Salvete,
> >
> > Fellow citizens,I think the latest string of
> conversation is wonderful with
> > many possibilities coming to light, from many areas of
> the Republic.
> >
> > I am very much in support of the idea of citizens
> joining together in their
> > districts, to work on projects in their area, if not
> just for the sake of
> > Roman fellowship but. to gather ideas together on
> expanding efforts, to
> > promote Roman values in the community.
> >
> > Beyond this, we have a great organization that has
> been established within
> > Nova Roma to promote a Temple for The Roman Gods et
> Goddessess in the
> > confines of Rome itself.This will be a great boon to
> Nova Roma as no other
> > one project could accomplish,That being the placing of
> the Religeo Romana on
> > the world stage once again.
> >
> > We have here a great opportunity to bring forth the
> greatest message of
> > religious statement to the people of the world to have
> occured in 2,000
> > years, in our lifetimes.
> >
> > Much talk in recent days has been given to change and
> historical change at
> > that.Let us practice carpe diem,to sieze the day now
> to enbrace these
> > ideals, for not only a better future for Nova Roma,
> but also all of
> > humankind.
> >
> > I call on all who can support in any way you can,
> whether it be a dollar or
> > a Euro to help build the Temple For The Gods in Rome.
> >
> > Vale et Valete,
> > For The Gods!
> > Ap.Galerius Aurelianus
> > Tribune of the Plebs
> >
> > --- On Wed, 12/17/08, Titus Flavius Aquila
> <titus.aquila@ yahoo.de<titus.aquila% 40yahoo.de> >
> > wrote:
> >
> > > From: Titus Flavius Aquila
> <titus.aquila@ yahoo.de<titus.aquila% 40yahoo.de>
> > >
> > > Subject: [Nova-Roma] Join the sodalitas proDIIS A
> Temple for the Gods in
> > Rome today !
> > > To: Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com
> <Nova-Roma%40yahoog roups.com>
> > > Date: Wednesday, December 17, 2008, 4:37 AM
> >
> > > Salvete Quirites !
> > >
> > > Up to date 18 citizens - among them the most
> noble and
> > > honourable ones - have joined the sodalitas to
> work on a
> > > project the world has not seen for over 1600
> years. To build
> > > a Temple for the Roman Gods in Rome.
> > >
> > > A Temple every citizen will be able to visit,
> where to
> > > participate or watch the religious rites, thus to
> see and
> > > to feel the results of a project fully owned by
> Nova Roma ,
> > > if approved by the Senate in February 2762 AUC.
> The
> > > Collegium is currently working on the business
> & project
> > > plan for presenting it to the patres conscripti
> and
> > > hopefully receive the official approval.
> > >
> > > Thus providing a real benefit to all citizens !
> To all of
> > > Nova Roma !
> > >
> > > As we have received this question already several
> times,
> > > this temple will be a republican Temple only
> Roman Gods
> > > will be worshipped , no foreign cults.
> > >
> > > All members will be actively involved in the
> project and in
> > > the decision making.Very soon we will discuss the
> temple
> > > baseline and the promoting of the project..
> > >
> > > For joining the sodalitas please send a short
> statement
> > > with your Roman name, the provincia you are
> residing in, and
> > > your email contact address to the Collegium of
> the
> > > sodalitas.
> > >
> > > If you would like to donate please find below the
> necessary
> > > information.
> > >
> > > The following PayPal account has been set-up for
> donations
> > > to the sodalitas proDIIS.
> > >
> > > If you would like to donate to the sodalitas
> account please
> > > transfer your money via PayPal to the following
> account:
> > >
> > > prodiis@yahoo. de <prodiis%40yahoo. de>
> > >
> > > Please state as keyword Donation for the Temple
> > >
> > > Thank you very much
> > >
> > > May the eternal Gods guard you all !
> > >
> > > Titus Flavius Aquila
> > > Collegium sodalitas proDIIS
> >
> >
> >


Group: Nova-Roma Message: 59991 From: Lucia Livia Plauta Date: 2008-12-17
Subject: Re: Saturnalia December 17th
Salvete omnes,
this is a very interesting epigram. First, I wonder exactly what this
kind of flask looked like and whether any like this has been found.

Second, the "toga rasa" is very interesting. It suggests that they
would "shear" togas for summer wear.

Valete,
L. Livia Plauta
>
> Aquila Maiori Omnibusque
>
> Io Saturnalia!
>
> A wonderful idea to share an epigram in Latin and one's native
> language!
>
> 2.85
> Vimine clausa levi niveae custodia coctae,
> Hoc tibi Saturni tempore munus erit.
> Dona quod aestatis misi tibi mense Decembri,
> Si quereris, rasam tu mihi mitte togam.
>
> A flask, enclosed in light wickerwork for water that's been boiled
> then iced - this will be my gift to you at the time of Saturnalia.
If
> you complain that I've sent you a summer gift in the month of
> December, then, for your part, send me a shorn toga.
>
> Valete!
>
> Julia Aquila
>
>
>
> -- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Maior" <rory12001@> wrote:
> >
> > Maior omnibus spd;
> >
> >
> > So amici here is a link to Martial's epigrams:
> > http://www.txclassics.org/saturnaliamartial.htm
> >
> > let's post an epigram in Latin and have the provincial language
> > translation: French, Italian, Russian, German, English.
> > Celebrate Saturnalia Novi Romani!
> > optime valete
> > M. Hortensia Maior
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 59992 From: Cn. Cornelius Lentulus Date: 2008-12-17
Subject: Celebrating Saturnalia
Cn. Cornelius Lentulus pontifex, quaestor etc. consulibus, praetoribus, tribunis plebis et omnibus Quiritibus et peregrinis, s. p. d.

IO SATURNALIA!

IO SATURNALIA!!

IO SATURNALIA!!!

The holidays of the 11th Nova Roman Saturnalia, in the Year of the 10th Anniversary, have begun today! I wish my fellow citizens a very happy and sacred Saturnalia, celebrations of humanity, friendship and peace. May Father Saturnus bless you all, together with Goddess Concordia who has a special significance and importance in these sacred days.

SATURNUS AND CONCORDIA

This is a time to show your fellow citizens that you love and respect them, you want peace, friendship and concord. This is still the Year of the Tenth Anniversary and Sacred Year of Concordia. Honour the Goddess and Her values in this Saturnalia and remember of the ten years of our republic.

You will find a ritual to Father Saturnus I as pontifex conducted before my home altar, including the name of Concordia. In my next message you will find a shorter version, too, for every Nova Roman citizen: you can use that prayer at your lararium during the following days of Saturnalia.

SATURNALIA GIFTS

Enjoy the celebrations! Make peace with your enemies and opponents! Be you the wiser and nicer - at least this time of the year. And present a nice gift to your friends (I've jus got my own from Livia Plauta -- an edition of Quintilian from 1736): Nova Roma has bookshops at Amazon USA, Canada and UK and if you buy through these shops, part of your purchase prices goes to support Nova Roma. Look at these:

http://astore.amazon.com/novrom-20
http://astore.amazon.ca/novrom08-20
http://astore.amazon.co.uk/novrom-21

Join the community of the friends and worshippers of the Nova Roman Concord:

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/NR_Concordia/


FESTIVE RITUALS AND SACRIFICES

I send you two rituals, but here below you'll find one ritual. One of the two rituals is that I've conducted before my home altar as a pontifex; you, too, can use this one if you are another pontifex or flamen or higher magistrate. But I've created another, shorter and simpler one, for ordinary citizens of Nova Roma. I wish as many of you as possible use that in your regular daily lararium prayers during the Saturnalia. That other one will be posted in my next message.


SACRIFICE TO FATHER SATURNUS FOR THE 11TH SATURNALIA AND 10TH NR ANNIVERSARY


Favete linguis!

(Beginning of the sacrifice.)

PRAEFATIO

Saturne, pater sanctissime,
te hoc ture commovendo
bonas preces precor,
uti sies volens propitius
Populo Novo Romano Quiritibus,
mihi, domo, familiae!

(Incense is placed in the focus of the altar.)

Concordia Populi Novi Romani Quiritium,
te hoc ture commovendo
bonas preces precor,
uti sies volens propitia
Populo Novo Romano Quiritibus,
mihi, domo, familiae!

(Incense is placed in the focus of the altar.)

Saturne, pater sanctissime,
uti te ture commovendo
bonas preces precatus sum,
eiusdem rei ergo
macte vino inferio esto!

(Libation of wine is made.)

Concordia Populi Novi Romani Quiritium,
uti te ture commovendo
bonas preces precatus sum,
eiusdem rei ergo
macte vino inferio esto!

(Libation of wine is made.)

PRECATIO

Saturne, pater sanctissime atque amatissime,
hocce die Saturnaliorum festivorum, anno anniversarii decimi Novae Romae,
te precor, quaesoque:
uti pacem concordiamque constantem
societati Novae Romae tribuas;
utique Rem Publicam Populi Novi Romani Quiritium
confirmes, augeas, adiuves,
atque pax et concordia, salus et gloria Novae Romae omni tempore crescat,
utique sies volens propitius Populo Novo Romano Quiritibus,
omnibus civibus, viris et mulieribus, pueris et puellabus Novis Romanis,
mihi, domo, familiae!

SACRIFICIUM

Quarum rerum ergo macte
hoc vino libando,
hoc ture ommovendo
esto fito volens propitius
Populo Novo Romano Quiritibus,
omnibus civibus, viris et mulierbus, pueris et puellabus Novis Romanis,
mihi, domo, familiae!

(Libation is made and incense is sacrificed.)

REDDITIO

Saturne, pater sanctissime,
uti te ture commovendo
et vino libando
bonas preces precatus sum,
earundem rerum ergo
macte vino inferio esto!

(Libation of wine is made)

Ilicet!

(End of the sacrifice.)

PIACULUM

Iane,
Saturne, pater sanctissime,
Concordia Populi Novi Romani Quiritium,
Iuppiter Optime Maxmime, Iuno, Minerva,
Omnes Di Immortales quocumque nomine:
si quidquam vobis in hac caerimonia displicet,
hoc vino inferio
veniam peto
et vitium meum expio.

(Libation of wine is made.)


HAPPY SATURNALIA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus,
Q U A E S T O R
P O N T I F E X
SACERDOS CONCORDIAE
------------------------------------------
Legatus Pro Praetore Provinciae Pannoniae
Sacerdos Provinciae Pannoniae
Interpres Linguae Hungaricae
Accensus Consulum T. Iulii Sabini et M. Moravii Piscini
Scriba Praetorum M. Curiatii Complutensis et M. Iulii Severi
Scriba Aedilis Curulis P. Memmii Albucii
Scriba Rogatoris Cn. Equitii Marini
Scriba Interpretis Linguae Latinae A. Tulliae Scholasticae
-------------------------------------------
Magister Sodalitatis Latinitatis
Dominus Factionis Russatae
Latinista, Classicus Philologus


Group: Nova-Roma Message: 59993 From: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com Date: 2008-12-17
Subject: a.d. XV Kal. Ian., 12/18/2008, 12:00 am
Reminder from:   Nova-Roma Yahoo! Group
 
Title:   a.d. XV Kal. Ian.
 
Date:   Thursday December 18, 2008
Time:   All Day
Repeats:   This event repeats every year.
Notes:   "At the end of the first century AD, Statius still could proclaim: "For how many years shall this festival abide! Never shall age destroy so holy a day! While the hills of Latium remain and father Tiber, while thy Rome stands and the Capitol thou hast restored to the world, it shall continue" (Silvae, I.6.98ff). And the Saturnalia did continue to be celebrated as Brumalia (from bruma, winter solstice) down to the Christian era, when, by the middle of the fourth century AD, its rituals had become absorbed in the celebration of Christmas." http://penelope.uchicago.edu/~grout/encyclopaedia_romana/calendar/saturnalia.html
 
Copyright © 2008  Yahoo! Inc. All Rights Reserved | Terms of Service | Privacy Policy
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 59994 From: Cn. Cornelius Lentulus Date: 2008-12-17
Subject: Your Saturnalia Rites
Cn. Cornelius Lentulus pontifex amicis et Quiritibus et peregrinis s. p. d.


IO SATURNALIA!


As I've said in my previous message, you will find your ritual to Father Saturnus, including the name of Concordia, in this message. It is written for every Nova Roman citizen: you can use this prayer at your lararium during the following days of Saturnalia.

This prayer here is a shorter and simpler one, for ordinary citizens of Nova Roma. I wish as many of you as possible use this in your regular daily lararium prayers during the days of Saturnalia.



SACRIFICE TO FATHER SATURNUS FOR THE 11TH SATURNALIA AND 10TH NR ANNIVERSARY

(After your regular rites at your lararium, say...)

PRAEFATIO

Saturne, pater sanctissime,
te hoc ture commovendo
bonas preces precor,
uti sis volens propitius
Novis Romanis, amicis meis,
mihi, domo, familiae!

(Incense is placed in the focus of the altar.)

Concordia,
te hoc ture commovendo
bonas preces precor,
uti sis volens propitia
Novis Romanis, amicis meis,
mihi, domo, familiae!!

(Incense is placed in the focus of the altar.)

Saturne, pater sanctissime,
uti te ture commovendo
bonas preces precatus sum,
eiusdem rei ergo
macte vino inferio esto!

(Libation of wine is made.)

Concordia,
uti te ture commovendo
bonas preces precatus sum,
eiusdem rei ergo
macte vino inferio esto!

(Libation of wine is made.)

PRECATIO

Saturne, pater sanctissime atque amatissime,
hoc die Saturnaliorum,
te precor, quaesoque:
uti pacem concordiamque
societati Novae Romae
familiaeque meae tribuas;
utique sis volens propitius
Novis Romanis, amicis meis,
mihi, domo, familiae!

SACRIFICIUM

Cuius rei ergo macte
hoc vino libando,
hoc ture ommovendo
esto fito volens propitius
Novis Romanis, amicis meis,
mihi, domo, familiae!

(Libation is made and incense is sacrificed.)

PIACULUM

Iane,
Saturne, pater sanctissime,
Concordia,
Lares, Manes, Penates,
Iuppiter, Iuno, Minerva,
Omnes Di Immortales quocumque nomine:
si quidquam vobis in hac caerimonia displicet,
hoc vino inferio
veniam peto
et vitium meum expio.

(Libation of wine is made.)



I wish my fellow citizens a very happy and sacred Saturnalia, celebrations of humanity, friendship and peace. May Father Saturnus bless you all, together with Goddess Concordia who has a special significance and importance in these sacred days. This is a time to show your fellow citizens that you love and respect them, you want peace, friendship and concord. This is still the Year of the Tenth Anniversary and Sacred Year of Concordia. Honour the Goddess and Her values in this Saturnalia and remember of the ten years of our republic.


HAPPY SATURNALIA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus,
Q U A E S T O R
P O N T I F E X
SACERDOS CONCORDIAE
------------------------------------------
Legatus Pro Praetore Provinciae Pannoniae
Sacerdos Provinciae Pannoniae
Interpres Linguae Hungaricae
Accensus Consulum T. Iulii Sabini et M. Moravii Piscini
Scriba Praetorum M. Curiatii Complutensis et M. Iulii Severi
Scriba Aedilis Curulis P. Memmii Albucii
Scriba Rogatoris Cn. Equitii Marini
Scriba Interpretis Linguae Latinae A. Tulliae Scholasticae
-------------------------------------------
Magister Sodalitatis Latinitatis
Dominus Factionis Russatae
Latinista, Classicus Philologus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 59995 From: Titus Iulius Sabinus Date: 2008-12-17
Subject: Re: Your Saturnalia Rites
SALVE ET SALVETE!

Thank you Pontifex Corneli Lentule for the nice rituals you conducted
and presented for the benefit of our entire Nova Roman community.
Your fine dedication is exemplary.

Thank you.

IO SATURNALIA!

VALE ET VALETE,
IVL SABINVS


--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Cn. Cornelius Lentulus"
<cn_corn_lent@...> wrote:
> IO SATURNALIA!
> As I've said in my previous message, you will find your ritual to
Father Saturnus, including the name of Concordia, in this message. It
is written for every Nova Roman citizen: you can use this prayer at
your lararium during the following days of Saturnalia.

> This prayer here is a shorter and simpler one, for ordinary
citizens of Nova Roma. I wish as many of you as possible use this in
your regular daily lararium prayers during the days of Saturnalia.
> SACRIFICE TO FATHER SATURNUS FOR THE 11TH SATURNALIA AND 10TH NR
ANNIVERSARY
> (After your regular rites at your lararium, say...)

> PRAEFATIO
> Saturne, pater sanctissime,
> te hoc ture commovendo
> bonas preces precor,
> uti sis volens propitius
> Novis Romanis, amicis meis,
> mihi, domo, familiae!
> (Incense is placed in the focus of the altar.)
> Concordia,
> te hoc ture commovendo
> bonas preces precor,
> uti sis volens propitia
> Novis Romanis, amicis meis,
> mihi, domo, familiae!!
> (Incense is placed in the focus of the altar.)
> Saturne, pater sanctissime,
> uti te ture commovendo
> bonas preces precatus sum,
> eiusdem rei ergo
> macte vino inferio esto!
> (Libation of wine is made.)
> Concordia,
> uti te ture commovendo
> bonas preces precatus sum,
> eiusdem rei ergo
> macte vino inferio esto!
> (Libation of wine is made.)
> PRECATIO
> Saturne, pater sanctissime atque amatissime,
> hoc die Saturnaliorum,
> te precor, quaesoque:
> uti pacem concordiamque
> societati Novae Romae
> familiaeque meae tribuas;
> utique sis volens propitius
> Novis Romanis, amicis meis,
> mihi, domo, familiae!
> SACRIFICIUM
> Cuius rei ergo macte
> hoc vino libando,
> hoc ture ommovendo
> esto fito volens propitius
> Novis Romanis, amicis meis,
> mihi, domo, familiae!
> (Libation is made and incense is sacrificed.)
> PIACULUM
> Iane,
> Saturne, pater sanctissime,
> Concordia,
> Lares, Manes, Penates,
> Iuppiter, Iuno, Minerva,
> Omnes Di Immortales quocumque nomine:
> si quidquam vobis in hac caerimonia displicet,
> hoc vino inferio
> veniam peto
> et vitium meum expio.
> (Libation of wine is made.)

> I wish my fellow citizens a very happy and sacred Saturnalia,
celebrations of humanity, friendship and peace. May Father Saturnus
bless you all, together with Goddess Concordia who has a special
significance and importance in these sacred days. This is a time to
show your fellow citizens that you love and respect them, you want
peace, friendship and concord. This is still the Year of the Tenth
Anniversary and Sacred Year of Concordia. Honour the Goddess and Her
values in this Saturnalia and remember of the ten years of our
republic.
> HAPPY SATURNALIA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
> Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus,
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 59996 From: fauxrari Date: 2008-12-17
Subject: Re: Your Saturnalia Rites
My kind friend Lentulus-
Thank you for your Saturnalia prayers. Forgive me of my (temporary)
ignorance of Latin, but do you have an English version or could you
suggest something appropriate in English? I am having a Saturnalia
party on Saturday and I really want to get everyone involved with my
lararium, but I just get my tongue around the prayers you gave us. I
am sincerely hoping to improve my knowledge of Latin in the future.
Many thanks,
L. Antonia Auriga
Master of the Horsepower
www.rallyestar.com

> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Cn. Cornelius Lentulus"
> <cn_corn_lent@> wrote:
> > IO SATURNALIA!
> > As I've said in my previous message, you will find your ritual to
> Father Saturnus, including the name of Concordia, in this message.
It
> is written for every Nova Roman citizen: you can use this prayer at
> your lararium during the following days of Saturnalia.
>
> > This prayer here is a shorter and simpler one, for ordinary
> citizens of Nova Roma. I wish as many of you as possible use this
in
> your regular daily lararium prayers during the days of Saturnalia.
> > SACRIFICE TO FATHER SATURNUS FOR THE 11TH SATURNALIA AND 10TH NR
> ANNIVERSARY
> > (After your regular rites at your lararium, say...)
>
> > PRAEFATIO
> > Saturne, pater sanctissime,
> > te hoc ture commovendo
> > bonas preces precor,
> > uti sis volens propitius
> > Novis Romanis, amicis meis,
> > mihi, domo, familiae!
> > (Incense is placed in the focus of the altar.)
> > Concordia,
> > te hoc ture commovendo
> > bonas preces precor,
> > uti sis volens propitia
> > Novis Romanis, amicis meis,
> > mihi, domo, familiae!!
> > (Incense is placed in the focus of the altar.)
> > Saturne, pater sanctissime,
> > uti te ture commovendo
> > bonas preces precatus sum,
> > eiusdem rei ergo
> > macte vino inferio esto!
> > (Libation of wine is made.)
> > Concordia,
> > uti te ture commovendo
> > bonas preces precatus sum,
> > eiusdem rei ergo
> > macte vino inferio esto!
> > (Libation of wine is made.)
> > PRECATIO
> > Saturne, pater sanctissime atque amatissime,
> > hoc die Saturnaliorum,
> > te precor, quaesoque:
> > uti pacem concordiamque
> > societati Novae Romae
> > familiaeque meae tribuas;
> > utique sis volens propitius
> > Novis Romanis, amicis meis,
> > mihi, domo, familiae!
> > SACRIFICIUM
> > Cuius rei ergo macte
> > hoc vino libando,
> > hoc ture ommovendo
> > esto fito volens propitius
> > Novis Romanis, amicis meis,
> > mihi, domo, familiae!
> > (Libation is made and incense is sacrificed.)
> > PIACULUM
> > Iane,
> > Saturne, pater sanctissime,
> > Concordia,
> > Lares, Manes, Penates,
> > Iuppiter, Iuno, Minerva,
> > Omnes Di Immortales quocumque nomine:
> > si quidquam vobis in hac caerimonia displicet,
> > hoc vino inferio
> > veniam peto
> > et vitium meum expio.
> > (Libation of wine is made.)
>
> > I wish my fellow citizens a very happy and sacred Saturnalia,
> celebrations of humanity, friendship and peace. May Father Saturnus
> bless you all, together with Goddess Concordia who has a special
> significance and importance in these sacred days. This is a time to
> show your fellow citizens that you love and respect them, you want
> peace, friendship and concord. This is still the Year of the Tenth
> Anniversary and Sacred Year of Concordia. Honour the Goddess and
Her
> values in this Saturnalia and remember of the ten years of our
> republic.
> > HAPPY SATURNALIA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
> > Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus,
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 59997 From: M•IVL•SEVERVS Date: 2008-12-17
Subject: ROMANS IN GERMANIA...
Salvete omnes,
 
I found this on Der Spiegel's web site. Hope you'll also find it interesting...
 
Valetye.

M•IVL•SEVERVS
 

GERMAN ARCHAEOLOGISTS HAIL NEW FIND

Discovery of Roman Battlefield Poses Historical Riddle

By Andrew Curry in Kalefeld, Germany

Archaeologists in Germany say they have found an ancient battlefield strewn with Roman weapons. The find is significant because it indicates that Romans were fighting battles in north Germany at a far later stage than previously assumed.

The wilds of Germany may not have been off-limits to Roman legions, archaeologists announced on Monday. At a press conference in the woods near the town of Kalefeld, about 100 kilometers south of Hanover, researchers announced the discovery of a battlefield strewn with hundreds of Roman artifacts dating from the 3rd century A.D.

Finding evidence of Roman fighting forces so far north is surprising, the archaeologists say. Germany was once considered prime territory for Roman conquest. But in A.D. 9, thousands of Roman legionaries were slaughtered in a forest near modern-day Bremen.

"We thought that with the Battle of the Teutoburg Forest, the Romans gave up on this region and pulled back behind the limes," or frontier fortifications further south, says Henning Hassmann, the Lower Saxony Conservation Department's lead archaeologist.

But evidence found in woods outside the small town of Kalefeld may force historians to take a new look at the Roman presence in Germany. More than 600 artifacts, ranging from axe heads and wagon parts to coins and arrowheads, have been found on a forested hill called the Harzhorn. So far, the artifacts indicate that Roman soldiers fought a battle on top of the hill.

The site first came to light in the summer of 2000, when local metal detector hobbyists found some pieces of metal while looking for a medieval fort. The fragments languished for years, until the men finally decided to turn them in to Petra Loenne, the Northeim area archaeologist.

Clustered Arrowheads Amid Towering Pines

Loenne immediately recognized an unusual tangle of metal. Called a "hippo-sandal," it was a sort of early horseshoe that was wrapped around the hoof of a horse or draft animal. "It definitely wasn't medieval," she says. In fact, it was Roman – but as far as Loenne knew it had no place in Lower Saxony, hundreds of miles north of the Roman frontier.

Loenne quickly assembled a team of archaeologists and historians – and local metal detector hobbyists with good connections to the archaeological authorities. Her priority was to locate any more artifacts close to the surface as quickly as possible. "We had to hurry and excavate before word got out and looters arrived," Loenne says.

Over the course of three months, they found a Roman-era battlefield spread over more than a mile of dense German forest. Standing under towering pines on Monday, Loenne said the battlefield may be one of the largest ever discovered intact from that era.

Metal detector hobbyists working under the watchful eye of Loenne and her team located over 600 metal objects, from Roman sandal nails to arrowheads and six-inch long iron spear points that once capped javelins fired from ballistae, a sort of giant crossbow.

After the press conference on Monday, the local fire department ferried visitors up a muddy dirt road to the hilltop. Snow still clung to the forest floor, which was pocked with tiny craters where archaeologists had dug holes.

The steep face of the hill was studded with tennis balls on spikes, each one marking where an artifact had been found. The center of the hill was covered with neon-green balls, each one marking where a ballista's javelin had landed; a few balls painted blue and green marked spear and arrow points. Archaeologists found eighty percent of the points were found oriented in the same direction. The rest may have bounced off of trees – or barbarians – and landed pointing in a different direction.

Battle Action Frozen in Time

Along the ridge on either side of the hilltop, dozens of tennis balls painted red support the argument. The red balls mark where Roman sandal nails came loose. After archers and artillery launched their weapons towards the defenders on top of the hill, the archaeologists think Roman legionaries may have swept in from either side to finish the job.

"It took half an hour or an hour at most, but it's preserved like it was frozen in time," said Michael Geschwinde, an archaeologist at the Lower Saxony Conservation Department who participated in the dig. "For an archaeologist, it's amazing to be able to explore this moment."

The layout of the battlefield contains yet another tantalizing clue: The Romans attacked the hill from the north, suggesting that they were on their way home from a mission even further into German territory. Geschwinde said there may have been about a thousand men on the Roman side, perhaps including auxiliary archers and spear-throwers from the empire's provinces in Africa and the Middle East.

At least one arrowhead still contained enough of the original wooden shaft to provide organic material for radiocarbon dating, which place it some time in the 3rd century A.D. Coins and other objects support the idea that the battle may have been fought some time between 200 and 250 A .D.

There is sketchy evidence in the histories for some sort of Roman push into German territory in the 3rd century. Historians like Herodian say the Emperor Maximinus Thrax declared war on the Germans, but this is the first evidence he may have actually carried out his threats. "From what sources say, he did push into Germany," says Eric de Sena, an archaeologist at John Cabot University in Rome. "In a way it seems to correspond with the histories."

The specialized artillery and hundreds of Roman sandal nails found atop Harzhorn Hill is a good indication the combatants were Romans, not barbarians using Roman weapons. Roman artifacts have been found as far north as the Baltic Sea, but have usually been dismissed as trade goods. "Roman sandals on German feet doesn't make sense, at least not in that amount," says Friedrich Lueth, head of the German Archaeological Institute's Roman German Commission. "At this late stage, it's quite surprising to see them so far north."

The site was under wraps until Monday to protect it from looters, but Loenne says full-scale excavations will commence in March to dig deeper into the mystery of Harzhorn Hill.

URL: http://www.spiegel.de/international/germany/0,1518,596720,00.html

RELATED SPIEGEL ONLINE LINKS: Photo Gallery: Archaeologists Find Roman Battlefield in Germany http://www.spiegel.de/fotostrecke/fotostrecke-38058.html


Group: Nova-Roma Message: 59998 From: Titus Flavius Aquila Date: 2008-12-18
Subject: AW: [Nova-Roma] ROMANS IN GERMANIA...
Salve Severus,amice
 
Thank you very much for sharing this information with all of us.
 
Optime vale
Titus Flavius Aquila


Von: M•IVL•SEVERVS <marcusiuliusseverus@...>
An: Nova Roma <nova-roma@yahoogroups.com>
Gesendet: Donnerstag, den 18. Dezember 2008, 04:38:02 Uhr
Betreff: [Nova-Roma] ROMANS IN GERMANIA...

Salvete omnes,
 
I found this on Der Spiegel's web site. Hope you'll also find it interesting. ..
 
Valetye.

M•IVL•SEVERVS
 

GERMAN ARCHAEOLOGISTS HAIL NEW FIND

Discovery of Roman Battlefield Poses Historical Riddle

By Andrew Curry in Kalefeld, Germany

Archaeologists in Germany say they have found an ancient battlefield strewn with Roman weapons. The find is significant because it indicates that Romans were fighting battles in north Germany at a far later stage than previously assumed.

The wilds of Germany may not have been off-limits to Roman legions, archaeologists announced on Monday. At a press conference in the woods near the town of Kalefeld, about 100 kilometers south of Hanover, researchers announced the discovery of a battlefield strewn with hundreds of Roman artifacts dating from the 3rd century A.D.

Finding evidence of Roman fighting forces so far north is surprising, the archaeologists say. Germany was once considered prime territory for Roman conquest. But in A.D. 9, thousands of Roman legionaries were slaughtered in a forest near modern-day Bremen.

"We thought that with the Battle of the Teutoburg Forest, the Romans gave up on this region and pulled back behind the limes," or frontier fortifications further south, says Henning Hassmann, the Lower Saxony Conservation Department's lead archaeologist.

But evidence found in woods outside the small town of Kalefeld may force historians to take a new look at the Roman presence in Germany. More than 600 artifacts, ranging from axe heads and wagon parts to coins and arrowheads, have been found on a forested hill called the Harzhorn. So far, the artifacts indicate that Roman soldiers fought a battle on top of the hill.

The site first came to light in the summer of 2000, when local metal detector hobbyists found some pieces of metal while looking for a medieval fort. The fragments languished for years, until the men finally decided to turn them in to Petra Loenne, the Northeim area archaeologist.

Clustered Arrowheads Amid Towering Pines

Loenne immediately recognized an unusual tangle of metal. Called a "hippo-sandal, " it was a sort of early horseshoe that was wrapped around the hoof of a horse or draft animal. "It definitely wasn't medieval," she says. In fact, it was Roman – but as far as Loenne knew it had no place in Lower Saxony, hundreds of miles north of the Roman frontier.

Loenne quickly assembled a team of archaeologists and historians – and local metal detector hobbyists with good connections to the archaeological authorities. Her priority was to locate any more artifacts close to the surface as quickly as possible. "We had to hurry and excavate before word got out and looters arrived," Loenne says.

Over the course of three months, they found a Roman-era battlefield spread over more than a mile of dense German forest. Standing under towering pines on Monday, Loenne said the battlefield may be one of the largest ever discovered intact from that era.

Metal detector hobbyists working under the watchful eye of Loenne and her team located over 600 metal objects, from Roman sandal nails to arrowheads and six-inch long iron spear points that once capped javelins fired from ballistae, a sort of giant crossbow.

After the press conference on Monday, the local fire department ferried visitors up a muddy dirt road to the hilltop. Snow still clung to the forest floor, which was pocked with tiny craters where archaeologists had dug holes.

The steep face of the hill was studded with tennis balls on spikes, each one marking where an artifact had been found. The center of the hill was covered with neon-green balls, each one marking where a ballista's javelin had landed; a few balls painted blue and green marked spear and arrow points. Archaeologists found eighty percent of the points were found oriented in the same direction. The rest may have bounced off of trees – or barbarians – and landed pointing in a different direction.

Battle Action Frozen in Time

Along the ridge on either side of the hilltop, dozens of tennis balls painted red support the argument. The red balls mark where Roman sandal nails came loose. After archers and artillery launched their weapons towards the defenders on top of the hill, the archaeologists think Roman legionaries may have swept in from either side to finish the job.

"It took half an hour or an hour at most, but it's preserved like it was frozen in time," said Michael Geschwinde, an archaeologist at the Lower Saxony Conservation Department who participated in the dig. "For an archaeologist, it's amazing to be able to explore this moment."

The layout of the battlefield contains yet another tantalizing clue: The Romans attacked the hill from the north, suggesting that they were on their way home from a mission even further into German territory. Geschwinde said there may have been about a thousand men on the Roman side, perhaps including auxiliary archers and spear-throwers from the empire's provinces in Africa and the Middle East.

At least one arrowhead still contained enough of the original wooden shaft to provide organic material for radiocarbon dating, which place it some time in the 3rd century A.D. Coins and other objects support the idea that the battle may have been fought some time between 200 and 250 A .D.

There is sketchy evidence in the histories for some sort of Roman push into German territory in the 3rd century. Historians like Herodian say the Emperor Maximinus Thrax declared war on the Germans, but this is the first evidence he may have actually carried out his threats. "From what sources say, he did push into Germany," says Eric de Sena, an archaeologist at John Cabot University in Rome. "In a way it seems to correspond with the histories."

The specialized artillery and hundreds of Roman sandal nails found atop Harzhorn Hill is a good indication the combatants were Romans, not barbarians using Roman weapons. Roman artifacts have been found as far north as the Baltic Sea, but have usually been dismissed as trade goods. "Roman sandals on German feet doesn't make sense, at least not in that amount," says Friedrich Lueth, head of the German Archaeological Institute's Roman German Commission. "At this late stage, it's quite surprising to see them so far north."

The site was under wraps until Monday to protect it from looters, but Loenne says full-scale excavations will commence in March to dig deeper into the mystery of Harzhorn Hill.

URL: http://www.spiegel. de/international /germany/ 0,1518,596720, 00.html

RELATED SPIEGEL ONLINE LINKS: Photo Gallery: Archaeologists Find Roman Battlefield in Germany http://www.spiegel. de/fotostrecke/ fotostrecke- 38058.html



Group: Nova-Roma Message: 59999 From: Titus Flavius Aquila Date: 2008-12-18
Subject: Io Triumphe! Io Saturnalia!

Salvete Quirites,

 

IO SATURNALIA !

IO SATURNALIA !!

IO SATURNALIA !!!

The most joyful time of the year has been reached .


 

A very happy , healthy and prosperous New Year to all of you !

 

Di vos incolumes custodiant !
 
Titus Flavius Aquila

Quaestor electus

Legatus Pro Praetore Provincia Germania

Scriba Censoris KFBM

Collegium sodalitas proDIIS

 

 

 


 

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60000 From: Gaius Petronius Dexter Date: 2008-12-18
Subject: Today in Rome: Dec 18, 2008.
C. Petronius Dexter omnibus Quiritibus s.p.d.,
 
Today in Rome :
 
(Julian day : 2 454 819).
 
A. d. XV Kalendas Ianuarias
MMDCCLXII anno Vrbis conditae.
Coss. M. Moravio T. Iulio.
 
Day of the week : Iovis dies (Thuesday).
 
Lunaris dies: XXII.
Nundinal letter : H.
Nundina.
 
Hora ortus Solis : 07:31.
Hora occasus Solis : 16:40.
Temp. Min. : 2° C.
Temp. Max. : 12° C.
Wind on Rome : 11 Km/h.
Humidity: 65%.
Weather: More sun than clouds. Cool.
 
Horae diei :
 
I: 07:32 - 08:16 Solis hora.
II: 08:16 - 09:01 Veneris hora.
III: 09:01 - 09:46 Mercurii hora.
IV: 09:46 - 10:30 Lunae hora.
V: 10:30 - 11:15 Saturni hora.
VI: 11:15 - 12:00 Iovis hora.
VII: 12:00 - 12:46 Martis hora.
VIII: 12:46 - 13:33 Solis hora.
IX: 13:33 - 14:20 Veneris hora.
X: 14:20 - 15:06 Mercurii hora.
XI: 15:06 - 15:53 Lunae hora.
XII: 15:53 - 16:40 Saturni hora.
 

Horae noctis :
 
I: 16:40 - 17:53 Iovis hora.
II: 17:53 - 19:06 Martis hora.
III: 19:06 - 20:20 Solis hora.
IV: 20:20 - 21:33 Veneris hora.
V: 21:33 - 22:46 Mercurii hora.
VI: 22:46 - 00:00 Lunae hora.
VII: 00:00 - 01:15 Saturni hora.
VIII: 01:15 - 02:31 Iovis hora.
IX: 02:31 - 03:46 Martis hora.
X: 03:46 - 05:02 Solis hora.
XI: 05:02 - 06:17 Veneris hora.
XII: 06:17 - 07:33 Mercurii hora.
 

Valete.
 
C. Petronius Dexter.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60001 From: MCC Date: 2008-12-18
Subject: Edictum Praetorium Curiatio-Iulio de Iurisdictione Praetoris

Praefatio

 

Praetores

 

Two praetors are elected by the Comitia Centuriata to serve a term lasting one year. They shall have the following honors, powers, and obligations:

  a. To hold Imperium and have the honor of being preceded by six lictors;

  b. To issue those edicta (edicts) necessary to engage in those tasks which advance the mission and function of Nova Roma and to administer the law (such edicts being binding upon themselves as well as others);

  c. To call the Senate, the comitia centuriata, and the comitia populi tributa to order when the Consuls are unavailable;

  d. To pronounce intercessio against another praetor or magistrate of lesser authority;

  e. To appoint scribae (clerks) to assist with administrative and other tasks, as they shall see fit.

  (Extract from Constitution of Nova Roma IV.A.3)

 

 Imperium

  The Comitia Curiatia invest elected Praetores with Imperium , which is necessary to employ Coercitio, interpret and execute law

  (Extract from Constitution of Nova Roma III.A)

 
In Nova Roma, we understand Imperium as:

  A. Having all the rights of potestas

  B. Ius agendi cum populo, calling the People to vote in any of their legislative Comitia.

  C. Ius agendi cum senatu, calling to Senate to vote or placing a proposed senatus consultum on the Senate agenda.

  D. Ius coercendi maior, the power to compel obedience using major force, on all Nova Roma subjects. In Nova Roma, this explicitly excludes physical force, and includes the force of law.

  E. Full iurisdictio, the power to interpret the law, on all levels on all Nova Roma subjects.

  (Extract from Lex Arminia de Imperio)

 

Coercitio

 
The power of coercitio is the power of the Praetores to impose sanctions on those who (by their conduct) hinder and/or  jeopardize the purposes of administration of justice.

 
I. Intent of this Edictum

 

1.     The intent of this edict, based on the Republican  Roman Law, is to complement our Leges Saliciae Iudiciaria et Poenalis for cases not covered explicitly in them, and is based in the Imperium of the Praetores, thus intending to fulfill article IV.A.3.b. of the Constitution of Nova Roma.

2.     Procedures and cases not covered explicitly in this Edictum or in the Leges of Nova Roma shall be solved at the discretion of the Praetor.

 

II. Entitlement to action, formal requirements, scope of a civil suit

 

A. Opposing parties

 

1.     Each citizen of Nova Roma has the right, without discrimination as regards status, reputation or duration of citizenship, to seek a remedy at the Praetor´s court as plaintiff  in civil suits. According the Lex Salicia Iudiciaria the plaintiff shall be addressed in this edictum as "actor". The defendant shall be addressed as "reus".

 

2.     Actor and Reus may be represented by another citizen (advocate). To appoint an advocate a party has to submit a written notice to the Praetor. This notice may be part of the statement of claim. The notice has to relate to all hearings and procedures.

 

B. Editio Actionis

 

 The actor must announce the action he is intending to exert to one of the praetores ("editio actionis"), and then the actor must ask the praetor to start the procedure ("petitio actionis"). The written statement of claim has to be transmitted to the Praetor directly, via e-mail or other suitable ways, with the following formal requirements:

 

1.     Actor, Reus, advocates and witnesses have to be identified with full legal Roman name.

2.  The statement of claim must consist of the facts of the case, the offering of available proof, the applicable law, supporting arguments for the application of law on the facts of the case.

 

 

III. Admissibility of claim

 

A. The Praetor acknowledges the receipt of the claim to the Actor.

 

B. The praetor shall decide, within 72 hours, if the petitio actionis shall be presented to a court or if it shall be dismissed. A praetor can dismiss a petitio actionis if and only if one of the following situations applies:

  B.a. The praetor has no competence in the issue.

  Example: a praetor can not mediate between two foreign parties, for his competence is limited to the citizens of Nova Roma.

 

B.b. The parties are not sui iuris in Nova Roma.

  Example: a minor can not play the part of an actor.

 

B.c. The claim is incongruent.

  Example: "Ticius must be expelled from Nova Roma because he is bearded" is an incongruent claim, for it is not supported by law, precedent or common sense.

 

C. If the claim is dismissed by the praetores, the actor shall be able to present his case again to the praetores in the future, waiting for two new praetores to be elected by the Comitia if necessary.

 

D. If the claim is approved by the praetores, it shall be presented to a court of justice defined according to this law. The reus shall be informed of the nature of the claim presented against him and of the identity of the actor within thirty-six (36) hours after the claim's approval. The Reus is then obliged to "make an appearance". To comply with this obligation the Reus has to transmit an answering statement with the same formal requirements as for the Actor's statement to the Praetor within one week after its receipt. If the Reus so applies, the Praetor may prolong the time limit for the transmission of the statement. By failing to transmit a statement within the prescribed time limit the Reus automatically loses the case. The Praetor will then render a judgement confirming the claim of the Actor without first appointing a Iudex or iudices.

 

E. The Reus may acknowledge the claim. In this case the Praetor confirms it by a publicly certified settlement. The settlement has to be announced to the parties and both parties then have to swear a written oath on the settlement. The publically certified settlement and the written oath will be entered into a public record.

 

F. If the Actor withdraws his claim before judgement, he or she loses the right to address the Praetor's Court with the same case in perpetuity. If the Actor presents new evidence, which is material to the claim itself, the Praetor decides, by his discretion, if the presented evidence are sufficient enough to approve the claim again.

 

 IV. Formula

 

According the Lex Salicia Iudiciaria:

 

1.     Once a claim has been accepted by a praetor, that same praetor shall prepare a formula to present to the iudices. The formula shall consist of a logical statement that instructs the iudices on the decision they must take. The formula shall be structured into four parts: institutio iudicis, intentio, demonstratio and condemnatio. An explanation of each part follows:

 

A.    INSTITVTIO IVDICIS: This clause appoints a certain iudex to judge the case (see below).

 

B.    INTENTIO: This part expresses the claim of the actor; i.e., it shall express what the actor seeks by petitioning the praetor. There are two kinds of intentio: intentio certa, when the facts that lead to the actor's claim are so obvious that they do not need to be proved, and intentio incerta, when the actor must prove the facts that justify his claim. Example: Intentio Certa: "According to the contract signed by Titius..." Intentio Incerta: "If it is proved that Ticius owes Gaius 1,000 sestertii, Gaius shall pay Ticius that same amount".

 

C.    DEMONSTRATIO: This is the clause that further defines an intentio incerta.

 

D.   CONDEMNATIO: This is the clause that allows the iudices to condemn or absolve.

 

Example: a formula could be something like this: "Let Sulpicius be the iudex. If it is proved that Ticius owes Gaius 1,000 sestertii, you, iudex, shall condemn Ticius to pay 1,000 sestertii to Gaius; else, you shall acquit Ticius."

 

The clauses would be: Institutio Iudicis: "Let Sulpicius be the iudex." Demonstratio: "If it is proved that ..." Intentio: "... Ticius owes Gaius 1,000 sestertii ..." Condemnatio: "... you, iudex, shall condemn Ticius to pay 1,000 sestertii to Gaius; otherwise, you shall acquit Ticius."

 

2.      To write down a formula, a praetor shall use one of these sources as a basis:

 

A. Lex: the intentio and the condemnatio shall never be in disagreement with the current laws of Nova Roma. They must follow these laws when the situation is explicitly treated by them.

 

B. Iurisprudentia: in those cases where the laws do not present an explicit treatment of a certain situation, a praetor shall create iurisprudentia (jurisprudence) applicable to all similar situations. Iurisprudentia is an expression of the Imperium of the praetor, and it has the same legislative power as a praetorial edictum. Because of this, laws approved by the Comitia shall always supersede iurisprudentia, and a certain praetor can alter previous iurisprudentia through an official edictum whenever common sense dictates that such a course of action is necessary.

 

 

V. The Iudices

 

According the Lex Salicia Iudiciaria:

 

1.     Once the formula is ready, iudices (judges) shall be appointed from the album iudicum, a list of all the citizens that can legally judge a case. The album iudicum shall include the names of all the assidui citizens that have been citizens of Nova Roma for over a year.

 

2.     The number of iudices that shall make up the tribunalis (court of justice) for a certain case shall be decided by the praetor according to the following guidelines:

 

A. The tribunalis shall be composed of ten (10) iudices whenever the intentio includes accusations of laesa patria (seriously threatening the well-being of the Republic), bribery, embezzlement of public funds, prevarication, electoral fraud, attacks to dignitas, slander or libel, or all the crimes defined by the Lex Salicia Poenalis or whenever the sententia might imply the loss of citizenship for one of the parties.

 

B. In all other occasions, the tribunalis shall be composed of a single iudex.

 

3.     The praetor shall aleatorily take a number of names equal to the number of iudices from the album iudicum. The following considerations apply:

 

A. If the praetor considers that some of the iudices thus appointed are obviously related by ties of interest to one of the parties, then the praetor shall, at his own discretion, dismiss those iudices and cast lots to appoint different iudices from the album iudicum.

 

B. A citizen thus appointed to a court shall be able to ask for an exemption from that judicial work if there are factors that do not allow him to serve in that position. The praetor must be asked for that exemption within thirty-six (36) hours of the official announcement of that appointment; the praetor shall grant that exemption at his own discretion, or he shall deny it, thus forcing the appointed iudex to serve or face an accusation of contempt.

 

C. Each party shall be able to dismiss a maximum of three (3) iudices, forcing a new iudex to be aleatorily taken from the album iudicum with each veto. Once both parties agree with a certain group of iudices, or both have already used their three vetoes, the remaining iudices shall be the final iudices, unless one of the preceding paragraphs applies.

 

D. If both parties can agree on a certain citizen(s) of Nova Roma to judge their case before a definitive group of legal iudices has been appointed, then the praetor shall include that citizen (or those citizens) among the iudices for the current case.

 

VI. Iudicium

 

1.     SI IN IUS VOCAT, ITO.

 

Both parties must be present at the trial on the date set by the Praetor. Any of the parties can choose to appoint an advocatus (advocate or barrister) to speak for them in front of the iudices, or they can choose to speak by themselves. An advocatus shall not receive a fee for his services.

 

2.     COM PERORANTO AMBO PRAESENTES:

Both Actor and Reus must be present in the court to speak; they shall plead together in person.

 

3.     POST MERIDIEM PRAESENTI LITEM ADDICITO

 

3.a If one of the parties does not appear on the date set by the Praetor the Praetor shall adjudge the case, in favour of the one present.

 

3.b If the Actor is not present at the trial on the date set by the Praetor means that he or she renounces litigate and he or she loses the right to address the Praetor's Court with the same case in perpetuity and face an accusation of contempt.

 

3.c If the Reus is not present at the trial he or she automatically loses the case because if the Reus does not offer a defense, then it is non contendere and left to the Praetor to decide his sentence because he has acquiesced to a verdict of guilt, and face an accusation of contempt.

 

3.d If both parties do not appear on the date set by the Praetor the Praetor they face an accusation of contempt.

 

3.e If one or both parties, for a justified and certified reason, cannot appear on the date set by the Praetor, shall notify it in advance at least 24 hours.

 

Having studied the causes, the Praetor may postpone the date of the trial up to a month, setting a new date for holding in agreement with the parties.

 

3.f The Praetor may, at his discretion, defer the trial if a guarantor or vindex guarantees that the cause of non-appearance, by the actor or Reus, is justified by unforeseen circumstances.

 

 This vindex or guarantor will be fined if his sponsored party is not present at trial on the new date set by Praetor.

 

4.     PROCEDURES

 

A.    A Once a tribunal has been appointed, the praetor shall inform the iudices of the formula that they shall apply. The praetor shall decide if the trial is going to be conducted under the public scrutiny or, should the dignitas of innocents be at stake, declare a secret summary and move the trial away from public scrutiny.

 

B.    The actor shall present evidence to back his demands, and then the reus shall present evidence to back his defense. Evidence shall consist of anything that is relevant to the case, including written texts, visual evidence, and the statements of witnesses or experts. In the case of statements, each party shall have the right to ask questions of the witnesses and experts presented by the other party.

 

C.    If the Reus does not offer a defense, then it is non contendere and left to the Praetor to decide his sentence because he has acquiesced to a verdict of guilt.

 

D.   The praetor shall be the final judge to determine what pieces of evidence are relevant to the case.

 

E.    Once both parties have presented their evidence, each party shall have the opportunity to make one final statement in front of the iudices, with the actor speaking in the first place. Then the praetor shall call for a sententia (sentence) from the iudices, according to Pars V of this Edict, reminding the iudices that, in case of doubt, they must *not* condemn the reus.

 

 VII. Sententia

 

1.     Once the praetor has called for a sententia, the iudices shall have seventy-two (72) hours to deliberate; within those seventy-two (72) hours, the iudices shall individually issue one of the following sentences:

 

a.     ABSOLVO: if the tribunal's majority decision is "absolvo", the reus shall be acquitted.

 

b.     CONDEMNO: if the tribunal's majority decision is "condemno", the reus shall be condemned according to the formula previously established by the praetor.

 

c.      Should there be a draw in the tribunal's votes, the reus shall be acquitted.

 
2.     Once all the iudices have issued their sententiae, the praetor shall immediately inform the parties of the sententia, and shall enforce any penalties through his imperium.


VIII. De Criminibus Poenisque

 

1.     The crimes and the penalties are listed in the Lex Salicia Poenalis Pars Altera.

2.     Iurisprudentia: in those cases where the laws do not present an explicit treatment of a certain situation, a praetor shall create iurisprudentia (jurisprudence) applicable to all similar situations. Iurisprudentia is an expression of the Imperium of the praetor, and it has the same legislative power as a praetorial edictum. Because of this, laws approved by the Comitia shall always supersede iurisprudentia, and a certain praetor can alter previous iurisprudentia through an official edictum whenever common sense dictates that such a course of action is necessary.

3.     Breach of warranty provided by the Vindex: the Vindex may be fined with no small amount equal to the taxes of one year and not over US $ 30.00. The Vindex shall be counted among the capite censi until the fine has been paid.

4.     Contempt:  The citizen accused  of contempt may be fined with no small amount equal to the taxes of two years and not over US $ 100.00 and shall be counted among the capite censi until the fine has been paid.

 

 
 

IX. Appeal and Reduction of fines

 

1.     The sentenced citizen can appeal the fines for contempt before the Praetores.

2.     The fines for contempt may be reduced by up to 90%, at discretion of the Praetores,  in the case that the fined citizen carry out the mandate or of the Praetores or of the Court

 

X. Provocatione ad Populum

 

1.     In those cases where a sententia implies a loss of citizenship, the reus shall have the right to publicly claim a confirmation vote from the Comitia Centuriata within fifteen (15) days after the issue of the sentence. Once the reus claims this right, the consules shall call the Comitia Centuriata within fifteen (15) days to vote upon the reus's expulsion. Should the Comitia Centuriata confirm the sententia, the sententia shall be applied. Should the Comitia Centuriata vote against the sententia, the sententia shall be nullified.

 

2.     In those cases where a sententia does not imply a loss of citizenship, the reus shall have the right to publicly claim a confirmation vote from the Comitia Populi Tributa within fifteen (15) days after the issue of the sentence. Once the reus claims this right, the consules shall call the Comitia Populi Tributa . Should the Comitia Populi Tributa confirm the sententia, the sententia shall be applied. Should the Comitia Populi Tributa  vote against the sententia, the sententia shall be nullified.

 

XI. Execution of Judgements

 

To execute an incontestable judgement or a publicly certified settlement, the Praetor may, on application of a party, call on all legal expedients available to him. He may also call on the help of all Magistrates of Nova Roma, who shall render such assistance as they are reasonably able to do so. The violation of an oath falls under the jusrisdiction of the collegia of the priesthood.

 

XII. Effective Date of this Edictum

 

This Edictum becomes effective immediately and will be in effect until formal legislation is enacted by the Comitia.

 

 

Hoc edictum ilico valet.

Datum sub manibus nostris a.d. XV Kal. Ian. MMDCCLXI A.V.C.

M.Moravio T.Iulio cos.

 

 

M.Curiatius Complutensis

M. Iulius Severus

Praetores Novae Romae

 

 

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60002 From: Cn. Cornelius Lentulus Date: 2008-12-18
Subject: Full Translation of Your Saturnalia Rites
Cn. Lentulus pontifex amicis et Quiritibus sal.

Io Saturnalia!

This is the translation of the Saturnalia daily ritual, as I've promised. After each Latin section there is the English translation, with a Hungarian accent :-) Please feel free to correct publicly my English, and then we will find together solutions to have a religious and sacral Roman English text.

Roman prayers were generally rhythmized, composed as verse of the rhythme of thoughts, repetions, alliterations, number of words and accents.

This is how my prayers are composed, and I tryed to make the English one so that it recall the Latin verses.

To use this prayer, you might consult the following articles about rites on our website:

http://novaroma. org/nr/Guide_ to_Sacrifice
http://novaroma. org/nr/Adoratio
http://novaroma. org/nr/Daily_ Rituals_( Nova_Roma)


YOUR TRANSLATED SATURNALIA DAILY RITUAL

(After your regular rites at your lararium, say...)

PRAEFATIO - PREFACE TO THE PRAYER

"Saturne, pater sanctissime,
te hoc ture commovendo
bonas preces precor,
uti sis volens propitius
Novis Romanis, amicis meis,
mihi, domo, familiae!
"

Saturnus, our most sacred father,
by offering you this incense
I pray good prayers so
that you be benevolent and propitious
to the Nova Romans, to my friends,
to me, to my household and to my family.

(Incense is placed in the focus of the altar.)

"Concordia,
te hoc ture commovendo
bonas preces precor,
uti sis volens propitia
Novis Romanis, amicis meis,
mihi, domo, familiae!!"


Concordia,
by offering you this incense
I pray good prayers so
that you be benevolent and propitious
to the Nova Romans, to my friends,
to me, to my household and to my family.

(Incense is placed in the focus of the altar.)

"Saturne, pater sanctissime,
uti te ture commovendo
bonas preces precatus sum,
eiusdem rei ergo
macte vino inferio esto!"


Saturnus, our most sacred father,
as by offering incense
I have prayed good prayers,
for the very same reason
be thou blessed by this wine.

(Libation of wine is made.)

"Concordia,
uti te ture commovendo
bonas preces precatus sum,
eiusdem rei ergo
macte vino inferio esto!"


Concordia,
as by offering incense
I have prayed good prayers,
for the very same reason
be thou blessed by this wine.

(Libation of wine is made.)

PRECATIO - THE PRAYER

"Saturne, pater sanctissime atque amatissime,
hoc die Saturnalium
te precor, quaesoque:
uti pacem concordiamque
societati Novae Romae
familiaeque meae tribuas;
utique sis volens propitius
Novis Romanis, amicis meis,
mihi, domo, familiae!"

Saturnus, our most sacred and beloved father,
on this day of the Saturnalia
I pray and ask you so
that you give peace and concord
to the society of Nova Roma
and to my own family;
and that you be benevolent and propitious
to the Nova Romans, to my friends,
to me, to my household and to my family.

SACRIFICIUM - THE SACRIFICE

"Cuius rei ergo macte
hoc vino libando,
hoc ture ommovendo
esto fito volens propitius
Novis Romanis, amicis meis,
mihi, domo, familiae!"

For this reason, thou blessed
by offering this wine,
by offering this incense
be benevolent and propitious
to the Nova Romans, to my friends,
to me, to my household and to my family.

(Libation is made and incense is sacrificed.)

PIACULUM - THE EXPIATION OF MISTAKES DURING THE RITUAL

"Iane,
Saturne, pater sanctissime,
Concordia,
Lares, Manes, Penates,
Iuppiter, Iuno, Minerva,
Omnes Di Immortales quocumque nomine:
si quidquam vobis in hac caerimonia displiceat,
hoc vino inferio
veniam peto
et vitium meum expio."

Ianus,
Saturnus, our most sacred father,
Concordia,
Lares, Manes, Penates,
Iuppiter, Iuno, Minerva,
All Gods Immortal, by whichever name:
if something in this cermony was unpleasant to you,
by this wine
I do apoligize
and expiate my mistake.

(Libation of wine is made.)

I wish my fellow citizens a very happy and sacred Saturnalia, celebrations of humanity, friendship and peace. May Father Saturnus bless you all, together with Goddess Concordia who has a special significance and importance in these sacred days. This is a time to show your fellow citizens that you love and respect them, you want peace, friendship and concord. This is still the Year of the Tenth Anniversary and Sacred Year of Concordia. Honour the Goddess and Her values in this Saturnalia and remember of the ten years of our republic.

HAPPY SATURNALIA!! !!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!


CN. CORNELIVS LENTVLVS
PONTIFEX

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60003 From: Lyn Dowling Date: 2008-12-18
Subject: Re: Full Translation of Your Saturnalia Rites
Avete omnes.
 
Thank you so much, Cn. Lentule, good priest and poet.
 
Io Saturnalia, everyone!
 
Valete,
L. Aemilia


From: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com [mailto:Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Cn. Cornelius Lentulus
Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2008 7:17 AM
To: Nova Roma ML
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Full Translation of Your Saturnalia Rites

Cn. Lentulus pontifex amicis et Quiritibus sal.

Io Saturnalia!

This is the translation of the Saturnalia daily ritual, as I've promised. After each Latin section there is the English translation, with a Hungarian accent :-) Please feel free to correct publicly my English, and then we will find together solutions to have a religious and sacral Roman English text.

Roman prayers were generally rhythmized, composed as verse of the rhythme of thoughts, repetions, alliterations, number of words and accents.

This is how my prayers are composed, and I tryed to make the English one so that it recall the Latin verses.

To use this prayer, you might consult the following articles about rites on our website:

http://novaroma. org/nr/Guide_ to_Sacrifice
http://novaroma. org/nr/Adoratio
http://novaroma. org/nr/Daily_ Rituals_( Nova_Roma)


YOUR TRANSLATED SATURNALIA DAILY RITUAL

(After your regular rites at your lararium, say...)

PRAEFATIO - PREFACE TO THE PRAYER

"Saturne, pater sanctissime,
te hoc ture commovendo
bonas preces precor,
uti sis volens propitius
Novis Romanis, amicis meis,
mihi, domo, familiae!
"

Saturnus, our most sacred father,
by offering you this incense
I pray good prayers so
that you be benevolent and propitious
to the Nova Romans, to my friends,
to me, to my household and to my family.

(Incense is placed in the focus of the altar.)

"Concordia,
te hoc ture commovendo
bonas preces precor,
uti sis volens propitia
Novis Romanis, amicis meis,
mihi, domo, familiae!!"


Concordia,
by offering you this incense
I pray good prayers so
that you be benevolent and propitious
to the Nova Romans, to my friends,
to me, to my household and to my family.

(Incense is placed in the focus of the altar.)

"Saturne, pater sanctissime,
uti te ture commovendo
bonas preces precatus sum,
eiusdem rei ergo
macte vino inferio esto!"


Saturnus, our most sacred father,
as by offering incense
I have prayed good prayers,
for the very same reason
be thou blessed by this wine.

(Libation of wine is made.)

"Concordia,
uti te ture commovendo
bonas preces precatus sum,
eiusdem rei ergo
macte vino inferio esto!"


Concordia,
as by offering incense
I have prayed good prayers,
for the very same reason
be thou blessed by this wine.

(Libation of wine is made.)

PRECATIO - THE PRAYER

"Saturne, pater sanctissime atque amatissime,
hoc die Saturnalium
te precor, quaesoque:
uti pacem concordiamque
societati Novae Romae
familiaeque meae tribuas;
utique sis volens propitius
Novis Romanis, amicis meis,
mihi, domo, familiae!"

Saturnus, our most sacred and beloved father,
on this day of the Saturnalia
I pray and ask you so
that you give peace and concord
to the society of Nova Roma
and to my own family;
and that you be benevolent and propitious
to the Nova Romans, to my friends,
to me, to my household and to my family.

SACRIFICIUM - THE SACRIFICE

"Cuius rei ergo macte
hoc vino libando,
hoc ture ommovendo
esto fito volens propitius
Novis Romanis, amicis meis,
mihi, domo, familiae!"

For this reason, thou blessed
by offering this wine,
by offering this incense
be benevolent and propitious
to the Nova Romans, to my friends,
to me, to my household and to my family.

(Libation is made and incense is sacrificed.)

PIACULUM - THE EXPIATION OF MISTAKES DURING THE RITUAL

"Iane,
Saturne, pater sanctissime,
Concordia,
Lares, Manes, Penates,
Iuppiter, Iuno, Minerva,
Omnes Di Immortales quocumque nomine:
si quidquam vobis in hac caerimonia displiceat,
hoc vino inferio
veniam peto
et vitium meum expio."

Ianus,
Saturnus, our most sacred father,
Concordia,
Lares, Manes, Penates,
Iuppiter, Iuno, Minerva,
All Gods Immortal, by whichever name:
if something in this cermony was unpleasant to you,
by this wine
I do apoligize
and expiate my mistake.

(Libation of wine is made.)

I wish my fellow citizens a very happy and sacred Saturnalia, celebrations of humanity, friendship and peace. May Father Saturnus bless you all, together with Goddess Concordia who has a special significance and importance in these sacred days. This is a time to show your fellow citizens that you love and respect them, you want peace, friendship and concord. This is still the Year of the Tenth Anniversary and Sacred Year of Concordia. Honour the Goddess and Her values in this Saturnalia and remember of the ten years of our republic.

HAPPY SATURNALIA!! !!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!


CN. CORNELIVS LENTVLVS
PONTIFEX

No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com
Version: 8.0.176 / Virus Database: 270.9.19/1855 - Release Date: 12/18/2008 10:16 AM

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60004 From: Rhonda Mills Date: 2008-12-18
Subject: New Roman
Salvete,

As a new Roman I would like to find the link for the New Roman list.
I would appreciate it very much if someone would provide me with that
information.

Valete,
Appia Flavia Lupa
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60005 From: marcushoratius Date: 2008-12-18
Subject: a. d. XV Kalendas Ianuarias: Saturnalia; Epona
M. Moravius Piscinus Horatianus cultoribus Deorum, Quiritibus et
omnibus salutem plurimam dicit: Io Saturnalia! Io Triumphe!

Hodie est ante diem XV Kalendas Ianuarias; haec dies comitialis est:
Saturnalia; Eponae

"It is the month of December, and yet the City is at this very moment
in a sweat. License is given to the general merrymaking. Everything
resounds with mighty preparations, - as if the Saturnalia differed at
all from the usual business day! So true it is that the difference
is nil, that I regard as correct the remark of the man who
said: 'Once December was a month; now it is a year.'" ~ L. Annaeus
Seneca, Epistle 1.1

The second day of Saturnalia began with an early morning bath
(Tertullian, Apol. 42). Then came the family's sacrifice of a
piglet. Generally such a sacrifice would indicate that it was
intended for the family's Lares.

Gather, while 'tis fine,
Your wood; tomorrow shall be gay
With smoking pig and streaming wine,
And lord and slave keep holyday.
~ Q. Horatius Flaccus, Carmina 3.17.13-16

The family then gathered, along with their household servants in a
shared meal, one shared as well with the Lares. It was during this
meal that the family members served their servants in a reversal of
roles (Macrobius, Saturnalia 1.7.37).

"The first inhabitants of Italy were the Aborigines, whose king,
Saturn, is said to have been a man of such extraordinary justice,
that no one was a slave in his reign, or had any private property,
but all things were common to all, and undivided, as one estate for
the use of every one; in memory of which way of life, it has been
ordered that at the Saturnalia slaves should everywhere sit down with
their masters at the entertainments, the rank of all being made
equal. Italy was accordingly called, from the name of that king,
Saturnia; and the hill on which he dwelt Saturnius, on which now
stands the Capitol, as if Saturn had been dislodged from his seat by
Jupiter." ~ M. Iunianus Iustinus, history 43.1

Later in the day, and into the night, Romans then went to one
another's homes for dinner, games, exchanges of gifts, and the
general merriment of the season. The popular gifts were writing
materials so that friends would be able to keep in touch, and the red
candles called cerei that symbolized the return of the sun following
the winter solstice. Days before the festival began, merchants sold
sigillaria as gifts for family and friends to exchange. These were
images made of paste or earthenware. A family used sigillaria as
votives to make "a piaculum to Dis Pater and Saturnus for themselves
and theirs (Macrobius, Saturnalia 1.10; 11.49)." In some of the
earliest deposits at Rome, in the favisse on Mount Saturno, later
called the Capitoline Hill, are found bronze figurines of humans.
These are sometimes misinterpreted to represent deities. Similar
deposits are found among the Sabines, where animals as well as people
are represented. They can be compared to the drawings in the Val
Camonica dating from the Bronze Age and Early Iron Age where figures
represent worshippers rather than deities. They may also compare
with votives found at shrines known for their healing properties.
Giving these out as gifts signified a blessing as the sigillarium
would be deposited in offering to Saturnus, to Dis Pater, to Janus,
and probably to other deities as well. Associated with Saturnus is
the fig tree (Plinius, H. N. 15.77), from which wood images of the
terrestrial deities were carved.

Epona

A sacrifice for Epona is mentioned in one fasti for today. A Goddess
of horses and horsemen, She is the only Celtic Goddess to have
entered in the religious calendar of Rome, but one of many to be
worshipped by Romans in other parts of the Empire.

"Fulvius Stellus hated women and used to consort with a mare and in
due time the mare gave birth to a beautiful girl and they named her
Epona. She is the Goddess that is concerned with the protection of
horses. So Agesilaus in the third book of his Italian History." ~
Pseudo-Plutarch, Paralllela Minora 29


AUC 822 / 69 CE: Death of Titus Sabinus

Titus Flavius Sabinus, the brother of Vespasianus, had been holding
the Capitoline Hill against Vitellius. The Capitolium itself was
burned to the ground; Sabinus was captured and executed.


Today's thought is from Epicurus, Vatican Sayings 52:

"Friendship dances around the world bidding us all to awaken to the
recognition of happiness."
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60006 From: Cn. Cornelius Lentulus Date: 2008-12-18
Subject: R: [Nova-Roma] New Roman
Cn. Lentulus Flaviae Lupae sal.


>>> As a new Roman I would like to find the link for the New Roman list.
I would appreciate it very much if someone would provide me with that

information. <<<


This is the link to the New Roman List:

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/newroman/



Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus,
Q U A E S T O R
P O N T I F E X
SACERDOS CONCORDIAE
------------------------------------------
Legatus Pro Praetore Provinciae Pannoniae
Sacerdos Provinciae Pannoniae
Interpres, Accensus, Scriba
-------------------------------------------
Magister Sodalitatis Latinitatis




Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60007 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2008-12-18
Subject: Re: New Roman
Salve Appia Flavia,

Appia Flavia Lupa <wolfmills@...> writes:

> Salvete,
>
> As a new Roman I would like to find the link for the New Roman list.
> I would appreciate it very much if someone would provide me with that
> information.

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/newroman

Vale,

CN-EQVIT-MARINVS
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60008 From: Publius Memmius Albucius Date: 2008-12-18
Subject: Io Saturnalia !
Salvete omnes !

Have all good time with your families, parents and friends !

And do not forget leaving your slaves have fun till midnight (they do
not work on Saturnalia) ! ;-)


Valete omnes,


P. Memmius Albucius
pr. el.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60009 From: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com Date: 2008-12-18
Subject: Nova Roma has Amazon shops!, 12/19/2008, 12:00 am
Reminder from:   Nova-Roma Yahoo! Group
 
Title:   Nova Roma has Amazon shops!
 
Date:   Friday December 19, 2008
Time:   All Day
Repeats:   This event repeats every Monday, Wednesday, and Friday until Wednesday December 31, 2008.
Notes:   Nova Roma now has Amazon shops! Buy through these shops and a portion of your price is returned to Nova Roma. See http://www.novaroma.org/nr/Amazon_affiliate for links.
 
Copyright © 2008  Yahoo! Inc. All Rights Reserved | Terms of Service | Privacy Policy
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60010 From: M. Lucretius Agricola Date: 2008-12-18
Subject: Tribunes
Would the new tribunes contact the IT staff at
http://www.novaroma.org/bin/contact?target=webmaster with the e-mail
addresses they would like to use to receive mail from the tribunes@
address?

Thanks

MLA
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60011 From: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com Date: 2008-12-18
Subject: Citizens, keep your e-mail information up to date!, 12/19/2008, 12:0
Reminder from:   Nova-Roma Yahoo! Group
 
Title:   Citizens, keep your e-mail information up to date!
 
Date:   Friday December 19, 2008
Time:   All Day
Repeats:   This event repeats every month.
Notes:   If you have changed your e-mail address recently, don't forget to update your Album Civium and wiki accounts. Our password recovery tools cannot work if they do not have your correct address.

Multas gratias vobis agimus.

Magistri aranearii
 
Copyright © 2008  Yahoo! Inc. All Rights Reserved | Terms of Service | Privacy Policy
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60012 From: Gaius Petronius Dexter Date: 2008-12-18
Subject: Today in Rome: Dec 19, 2008.
C. Petronius Dexter omnibus Quiritibus s.p.d.,
 
Today in Rome :
 
(Julian day : 2 454 820).
 
A. d. XIV Kalendas Ianuarias
MMDCCLXII anno Vrbis conditae.
Coss. M. Moravio T. Iulio.
 
Day of the week : Veneris dies (Friday).
 
Lunaris dies: XXIII.
Nundinal letter : A.
Luna decrescens.
 
Hora ortus Solis : 07:33.
Hora occasus Solis : 16:41.
Temp. Min. : 3° C.
Temp. Max. : 11° C.
Wind on Rome : 23 Km/h.
Humidity: 70%.
Weather: Clouds. Sun. Cool.
 
Horae diei :
 
I: 07:33 - 08:17 Lunae hora.
II: 08:17 - 09:02 Saturni hora.
III: 09:02 - 09:46 Iovis hora.
IV: 09:46 - 10:31 Martis hora.
V: 10:31 - 11:15 Solis hora.
VI: 11:15 - 12:00 Veneris hora.
VII: 12:00 - 12:46 Mercurii hora.
VIII: 12:46 - 13:33 Lunae hora.
IX: 13:33 - 14:20 Saturni hora.
X: 14:20 - 15:07 Iovis hora.
XI: 15:07 - 15:54 Martis hora.
XII: 15:54 - 16:41 Solis hora.
 

Horae noctis :
 
I: 16:41 - 17:54 Veneris hora.
II: 17:54 - 19:07 Mercurii hora.
III: 19:07 - 20:20 Lunae hora.
IV: 20:20 - 21:33 Saturni hora.
V: 21:33 - 22:46 Iovis hora.
VI: 22:46 - 00:00 Martis hora.
VII: 00:00 - 01:15 Solis hora.
VIII: 01:15 - 02:31 Veneris hora.
IX: 02:31 - 03:46 Mercurii hora.
X: 03:46 - 05:02 Lunae hora.
XI: 05:02 - 06:17 Saturni hora.
XII: 06:17 - 07:33 Iovis hora.
 

Valete.
 
C. Petronius Dexter.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60013 From: marcushoratius Date: 2008-12-19
Subject: a. d. XIIII Kalendas Ianuarias: OPALIA
M. Moravius Piscinus Horatianus cultoribus Deorum, Quiritibus et
omnibus salutem plurimam dicit: Io Saturnalia! Io Triumphe!

Hodie est ante diem XIIII Kalendas Ianuaras; haec dies nefastus est:
Opalia feriae

"Saturnus, Great King of ancient starry skies and earth primeval,
under Your peaceful reign never was anyone's tranquility disturbed by
labor. ~ M. Valerius Martialis 12.62.1

Principes Dei Caelum et Terra. Idem principes in Latio Saturnus et
Ops.

"The first Gods were Sky and Earth. These Gods are the same as those
who in Egypt are called Serapis and Isis, though Harpocrates with his
finger makes a sign bidding me to be silent. In Latium the same
first Gods were Saturnus and Ops. For Terra and Caelum, as the
mysteries of Samothrace teach, are Great Gods, Â… but these are those
whom the Augurum Libri mention in writing as the Potent Gods, Divi
Potes, for what the Samothracians call Theoi Dynatoi." ~ Varro,
Lingua Latinae 5.57-58

Plutarch, Roman Questions 12: "And why do they consider Saturnus
Father of Truth? Is it that they think, as do certain philosophers
that Saturnus (Kronos) is Time (Chronos), and Time discovers the
truth? Or because it is likely that the fabled Golden Age of
Saturnus, if it was an age of the greatest righteousness,
participated most largely in truth?"

To Mother Earth

"Holy Goddess, Ops, Mother of all Nature, engendering all things and
regenerating them each day, as You alone bring forth from Your womb
all things into life.

"Heavenly Goddess, overseeing all things on earth and throughout the
seas, in whatever by silent nature is restored in sleep and in death,
in the same way that You put to flight the Night with the Light You
restore each day.

"Earth, Enricher of Life, You dispel the dark shadow of death and the
disorder of vast endless Chaos. You hold back the winds and storms,
the rain showers and tempests. You alone regulate the weather cycles,
either bestirring or putting to flight the storm, interspersing them
with cheerful days.

"You give the Food of Life unfailingly, in fidelity, and when the
soul by necessity departs, in You alone do we find refuge. Thus,
whatever You give, in You all will be returned. Deservedly are You
called Great Mother of the Gods. Piously then are all the celestial
powers distilled in You. The One and True parent of all living
things, human and divine. Without You nothing could be born, nothing
could grow, and nothing mature.

"You are the Great Goddess, the Queen of Heaven, You, Goddess, I
adore. I call upon Your power, come. Make what I ask to be readily
and easily accomplished, and draw my thanks, Mother Earth, that, in
fidelity, You do rightly merit." ~ Antonius Musa, Precatio Terrae


Rites for Ops, like those for Saturnus, Tellus, and Ceres, should be
performed ritus Graecus. Ops probably received the same offerings as
did Tellus and Ceres at the Ides, these being a sow, spelt cakes,
milk and honey, with violets or orris root offered to Her as incense.


AUC 562 / 191 BCE: Dedication of the Temple of Iuventas in the Circus
Maximus.

Our thought for today is from Epictetus, Enchiridion 50:

"Whatever rules you have adopted, abide by them as laws, and as if
you would be impious to transgress them; and do not regard what any
one says of you, for this, after all, is no concern of yours."
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60014 From: marcushoratius Date: 2008-12-19
Subject: Battle on the Trebbia
M. Moravius Piscinus salutem:

Yesterday I forgot to mention that it was the anniversary of the
Battle of Trebbia. It was the first major battle of the Second Punic
War. There had been skirmishes before this. It was the only battle
in which Hannible had elephants to deploy. All of the elephants that
crossed the Alps, save for the bull elephant Sura, died in the days
following this battle, due to cold and disease.

The Roman commander, T. Sempronius Longus, was anxious to win himself
glory in the final days of his term of office. And thus he pushed
his troops forward, when he should probably have taken a defensive
position. He sent his four legions forward, across the freezing
waters of the channels of the Trebbia, before they were able to have
their breakfast. Snow and sleet came down from the slopes of the
Alps right in the faces of the Romans, and from behind the
Carthaginians. Then it began to rain, so that the Roman army of
heavy infantry became bogged down as the Carthaginian light infantry
and Numidian cavalry were able to engage them with missles. All
around it was a very bad day for Sempronius and his army. This is
the account given by Livy:

a. d. XV Kal. Ian. AUC 535 / 18 Dec. 218 BCE: Battle of Trebbia

"After sending Mago with his 1000 infantry and 1000 cavalry to take
up his position, Hannibal gave orders for the Numidian cavalry to
cross the Trebia in the early dawn and ride up to the gates of the
Roman camp; then they were to discharge their missiles on the
outposts and so goad the enemy on to battle. When the fighting had
once started they were gradually to give ground and draw their
pursuers to their own side of the river. These were the instructions
to the Numidians; the other commanders, both infantry and cavalry,
were ordered to see that all their men had breakfast, after which
they were to wait for the signal, the men fully armed, the horses
saddled and ready. Eager for battle, and having already made up his
mind to fight, Sempronius (Longus) led out the whole of his cavalry
to meet the Numidian attack, for it was in his cavalry that he placed
most confidence; these were followed by 6000 infantry and at last the
whole of his force marched on to the field. It happened to be the
season of winter, a snowstorm was raging, and the district, situated
between the Alps and the Apennines, was rendered especially cold by
the vicinity of rivers and marshes. To make matters worse, men and
horses alike had been hurriedly sent forward, without any food,
without any protection against the cold, so they had no heat in them
and the chilling blasts from the river made the cold still more
severe as they approached it in their pursuit of the Numidians. But
when they entered the water which had been swollen by the night's
rain and was then breast high, their limbs became stiff with cold,
and when they emerged on the other side they had hardly strength to
hold their weapons; they began to grow faint from fatigue and as the
day wore on, from hunger.

"Hannibal's men, meanwhile, had made fires in front of their tents,
oil had been distributed amongst the maniples for them to make their
joints and limbs supple and they had time for an ample repast. When
it was announced that the enemy had crossed the river they took their
arms, feeling alert and active in mind and body, and marched to
battle. The Balearic and light-armed infantry were posted in front of
the standards; they numbered about 8000; behind them the heavy-armed
infantry, the mainstay and backbone of the army; on the flanks
Hannibal distributed the cavalry, and outside them, again, the
elephants. When the consul saw his cavalry, who had lost their order
in the pursuit, suddenly meeting with an unsuspected resistance from
the Numidians, he recalled them by signal and received them within
his infantry. There were 18,000 Romans, 20,000 Latin allies, and an
auxiliary force of Cenomani, the only Gallic tribe which had remained
faithful. These were the forces engaged. The Balearics and light
infantry opened the battle, but on being met by the heavier legions
they were rapidly withdrawn to the wings, an evolution which at once
threw the Roman horse into difficulties, for the 4000 wearied
troopers had been unable to offer an effective resistance to 10,000
who were fresh and vigorous, and now in addition they were
overwhelmed by what seemed a cloud of missiles from the light
infantry. Moreover, the elephants, towering aloft at the ends of the
line, terrified the horses not only by their appearance but by their
unaccustomed smell, and created widespread panic. The infantry
battle, as far as the Romans were concerned, was maintained more by
courage than by physical strength, for the Carthaginians, who had
shortly before been getting themselves into trim, brought their
powers fresh and unimpaired into action, whilst the Romans were
fatigued and hungry and stiff with cold. Still, their courage would
have kept them up had it been only infantry that they were fighting
against. But the light infantry, after repulsing the cavalry, were
hurling their missiles on the flanks of the legions; the elephants
had now come up against the centre of the Roman line, and Mago and
his Numidians, as soon as it had passed their ambuscade, rose up in
the rear and created a terrible disorder and panic. Yet in spite of
all the dangers which surrounded them, the ranks stood firm and
immovable for some time, even, contrary to all expectation, against
the elephants. Some skirmishers who had been placed where they could
attack these animals flung darts at them and drove them off, and
rushed after them, stabbing them under their tails, where the skin is
soft and easily penetrated.

"Maddened with pain and terror, they were beginning to rush wildly on
their own men, when Hannibal ordered them to be driven away to the
left wing against the auxiliary Gauls on the Roman right. There they
instantly produced unmistakable panic and flight, and the Romans had
fresh cause for .alarm when they saw their auxiliaries routed. They
now stood fighting in a square, and about 10,000 of them, unable to
escape in any other direction, forced their way through the centre of
the African troops and the auxiliary Gauls who supported them and
inflicted an immense loss on the enemy. They were prevented by the
river from returning to their camp, and the rain made it impossible
for them to judge where they could best go to the assistance of their
comrades, so they marched away straight to Placentia. Then desperate
attempts to escape were made on all sides; some who made for the
river were swept away by the current or caught by the enemy while
hesitating to cross; others, scattered over the fields in flight,
followed the track of the main retreat and sought Placentia; others,
fearing the enemy more than the river, crossed it and reached their
camp. The driving sleet and the intolerable cold caused the death of
many men and baggage animals, and nearly all the elephants perished.
The Carthaginians stopped their pursuit at the banks of the Trebia
and returned to their camp so benumbed with cold that they hardly
felt any joy in their victory." ~ Titus Livius 21.54-56
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60015 From: RANDALL HERRERA RIOS Date: 2008-12-19
Subject: ROMANS IN GERMANIA...
What a beautiful article!!! The Roman name will always shake our souls with new amazing discoveries such as these ones!!! This is why with deep respect we, lovers of Roman Culture, still approach today with almost religious fear to the old forgotten  monuments and
battlefields. This is why our lives are hopelessly intertwined with the those lives of the times of old that still beat in our hearts, that still flow through our veins.

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60016 From: Patrick D. Owen Date: 2008-12-19
Subject: Edictum Praetorium Curiatio-Iulio de Iurisdictione Praetoris - Resp
Edictum Praetorium Curiatio-Iulio de Iurisdictione Praetoris -
Opinion of Fl. Galerius Aurelianus Tribunus Plebis

Fl. Galerius Aurelianus S.P.D.

I have made a number of comments in response to this edictum. I
encourage the praetores to withdraw it until they can demonstrate the
basis for some of their points to the satisfaction of myself and my
fellow Tribunes. If this edictum stands as written, I will consider
the pronouncement of intercessio on the basis that it is not in
agreement with several specific points of the NR Constitution and the
by-laws of Nova Roma.

Several comments that I have made are my personal opinion and should
not be considered to be legal objections. The Leges Saliciae
Iudiciaria et Poenalis are legally in force and I must defend them by
my oath of office; however much I believe that they should be
eliminated or moderated by new actions in the Senate and the
Assemblies.

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, MCC <complutensis@...> wrote:
>
> *Praefatio*

Praetores

Two praetors are elected by the Comitia Centuriata to serve a term
lasting one year. They shall have the following honors, powers, and
obligations:

a. To hold Imperium and have the honor of being preceded by six
lictors;

b. To issue those edicta (edicts) necessary to engage in those tasks
which advance the mission and function of Nova Roma and to administer
the law (such edicts being binding upon themselves as well as others);

FlGA: I believe that "...the law.." should be changed to "NR law"
and/or that an addendum be included that states, beyond any doubt,
that NR law cannot infringe upon the macronational laws & protections
of a member. I bring this up since the SC that made privately owned
lists the legal property of NR was blantantly illegal and violated
the spirit and letter of the Yahoo Groups rules as well as the U.S.
laws/international laws regarding ownership of a website unless that
website or list was established ex officio.

c. To call the Senate, the comitia centuriata, and the comitia populi
tributa to order when the Consuls are unavailable;

d. To pronounce intercessio against another praetor or magistrate of
lesser authority;

FlGA: Providing that the Praetores also quote the appropriate legal
basis for their intercessio.

e. To appoint scribae (clerks) to assist with administrative and
other tasks, as they shall see fit.

(Extract from Constitution of Nova Roma IV.A.3)


*Imperium*

The Comitia Curiatia invest elected Praetores with Imperium , which
is necessary to employ Coercitio, interpret and execute law

FlGA: Again it needs to be insured that "law" means that
macronational law cannot be violated by an NR law.

(Extract from Constitution of Nova Roma III.A)

In Nova Roma, we understand Imperium as:

A. Having all the rights of potestas

B. Ius agendi cum populo, calling the People to vote in any of their
legislative Comitia.

C. Ius agendi cum senatu, calling to Senate to vote or placing a
proposed senatus consultum on the Senate agenda.

D. Ius coercendi maior, the power to compel obedience using major
force, on all Nova Roma subjects. In Nova Roma, this explicitly
excludes physical force, and includes the force of law.

FlGA: Considering the debacle that occurred in the case of LECA, I
believe that this subject should be discussed by all appropriate
parties. I believe that the Praetores should have the legal power to
moderate an offending citizen but I fail to understand where their
power to impose monetary penalties upon a citizen is derived or how
such penalties are to be calculated.

E. Full iurisdictio, the power to interpret the law, on all levels on
all Nova Roma subjects.

(Extract from Lex Arminia de Imperio)


*Coercitio*

The power of coercitio is the power of the Praetores to impose
sanctions on those who (by their conduct) hinder and/or jeopardize
the purposes of administration of justice.

FlGA: Again I must say that I have always interpreted praetorial
sanctions to be limited to moderation of the lists. I do not believe
that other penalties are clearly provided for in the collective
Constitution & by-laws of our corporation.

> *
> I. Intent of this Edictum*

1. The intent of this edict, based on the Republican Roman Law, is
to complement our Leges Saliciae Iudiciaria et Poenalis for cases not
covered explicitly in them, and is based in the Imperium of the
Praetores, thus intending to fulfill article IV.A.3.b. of the
Constitution of Nova Roma.

2. Procedures and cases not covered explicitly in this Edictum or in
the Leges of Nova Roma shall be solved at the discretion of the
Praetor.

FlGA: I definitely oppose this statement since I do not believe
that "discretion" should be a basis for by-laws, since such legal by-
laws would prevent the need for discretion except as spelled out in a
by-law.

*II. Entitlement to action, formal requirements, scope of a civil
suit*

A. Opposing parties

1. Each citizen of Nova Roma has the right, without discrimination
as regards status, reputation or duration of citizenship, to seek a
remedy at the Praetor´s court as plaintiff in civil suits. According
the Lex Salicia Iudiciaria the plaintiff shall be addressed in this
edictum as "actor". The defendant shall be addressed as "reus".

2. Actor and Reus may be represented by another citizen (advocate).
To appoint an advocate a party has to submit a written notice to the
Praetor. This notice may be part of the statement of claim. The
notice has to relate to all hearings and procedures.

B. Editio Actionis

The actor must announce the action he is intending to exert to one of
the praetores ("editio actionis"), and then the actor must ask the
praetor to start the procedure ("petitio actionis"). The written
statement of claim has to be transmitted to the Praetor directly, via
e-mail or other suitable ways, with the following formal requirements:

1. Actor, Reus, advocates and witnesses have to be identified with
full legal Roman name.

2. The statement of claim must consist of the facts of the case, the
offering of available proof, the applicable law, supporting arguments
for the application of law on the facts of the case.

*III. Admissibility of claim*

A. The Praetor acknowledges the receipt of the claim to the Actor.

B. The praetor shall decide, within 72 hours, if the petitio actionis
shall be presented to a court or if it shall be dismissed. A praetor
can dismiss a petitio actionis if and only if one of the following
situations applies:

B.a. The praetor has no competence in the issue.

Example: a praetor can not mediate between two foreign parties, for
his competence is limited to the citizens of Nova Roma.

B.b. The parties are not sui iuris in Nova Roma.

Example: a minor can not play the part of an actor.

B.c. The claim is incongruent.

Example: "Ticius must be expelled from Nova Roma because he is
bearded" is an incongruent claim, for it is not supported by law,
precedent or common sense.

C. If the claim is dismissed by the praetores, the actor shall be
able to present his case again to the praetores in the future,
waiting for two new praetores to be elected by the Comitia if
necessary.

D. If the claim is approved by the praetores, it shall be presented
to a court of justice defined according to this law. The reus shall
be informed of the nature of the claim presented against him and of
the identity of the actor within thirty-six (36) hours after the
claim's approval. The Reus is then obliged to "make an appearance".
To comply with this obligation the Reus has to transmit an answering
statement with the same formal requirements as for the Actor's
statement to the Praetor within one week after its receipt. If the
Reus so applies, the Praetor may prolong the time limit for the
transmission of the statement. By failing to transmit a statement
within the prescribed time limit the Reus automatically loses the
case. The Praetor will then render a judgement confirming the claim
of the Actor without first appointing a Iudex or iudices.

E. The Reus may acknowledge the claim. In this case the Praetor
confirms it by a publicly certified settlement. The settlement has to
be announced to the parties and both parties then have to swear a
written oath on the settlement. The publically certified settlement
and the written oath will be entered into a public record.

F. If the Actor withdraws his claim before judgement, he or she loses
the right to address the Praetor's Court with the same case in
perpetuity. If the Actor presents new evidence, which is material to
the claim itself, the Praetor decides, by his discretion, if the
presented evidence are sufficient enough to approve the claim again.

*IV. Formula*

According the Lex Salicia Iudiciaria:

1. Once a claim has been accepted by a praetor, that same praetor
shall prepare a formula to present to the iudices. The formula shall
consist of a logical statement that instructs the iudices on the
decision they must take. The formula shall be structured into four
parts: institutio iudicis, intentio, demonstratio and condemnatio. An
explanation of each part follows:

A. INSTITVTIO IVDICIS: This clause appoints a certain iudex to
judge the case (see below).

B. INTENTIO: This part expresses the claim of the actor; i.e., it
shall express what the actor seeks by petitioning the praetor. There
are two kinds of intentio: intentio certa, when the facts that lead
to the actor's claim are so obvious that they do not need to be
proved, and intentio incerta, when the actor must prove the facts
that justify his claim. Example: Intentio Certa: "According to the
contract signed by Titius..." Intentio Incerta: "If it is proved that
Ticius owes Gaius 1,000 sestertii, Gaius shall pay Ticius that same
amount".

C. DEMONSTRATIO: This is the clause that further defines an
intentio incerta.

D. CONDEMNATIO: This is the clause that allows the iudices to
condemn or absolve.

Example: a formula could be something like this: "Let Sulpicius be
the iudex. If it is proved that Ticius owes Gaius 1,000 sestertii,
you, iudex, shall condemn Ticius to pay 1,000 sestertii to Gaius;
else, you shall acquit Ticius."

The clauses would be: Institutio Iudicis: "Let Sulpicius be the
iudex."
Demonstratio: "If it is proved that ..." Intentio: "... Ticius owes
Gaius 1,000 sestertii ..." Condemnatio: "... you, iudex, shall
condemn Ticius to pay 1,000 sestertii to Gaius; otherwise, you shall
acquit Ticius."

2. To write down a formula, a praetor shall use one of these
sources as a basis:

A. Lex: the intentio and the condemnatio shall never be in
disagreement with the current laws of Nova Roma. They must follow
these laws when the situation is explicitly treated by them.

B. Iurisprudentia: in those cases where the laws do not present an
explicit treatment of a certain situation, a praetor shall create
iurisprudentia (jurisprudence) applicable to all similar situations.
Iurisprudentia is an expression of the Imperium of the praetor, and
it has the same legislative power as a praetorial edictum. Because of
this, laws approved by the Comitia shall always supersede
iurisprudentia, and a certain praetor can alter previous
iurisprudentia through an official edictum whenever common sense
dictates that such a course of action is necessary.

FlGA: Is there anyone in NR besides myself who believes that the
Leges Saliciae Iudiciaria et Poenalis is just too much for a
primarily internet organization? I believe the time has come for NR
to rid itself of these cumbersome leges and replace them with
something that limits such "legal" cases to moderation of those who
by insulting language or inappropriate posts AND actions involving
the Macellum. Personally, I believe that since the penalties of a
legal judicial system in NR cannot be legally enforced. The only
genuine penalties that can be enforced is moderation on all NR lists,
permanent banning from one or more lists, and expulsion from Nova
Roma "for the good of the organization."

*V. The Iudices*

According the Lex Salicia Iudiciaria:

1. Once the formula is ready, iudices (judges) shall be appointed
from the album iudicum, a list of all the citizens that can legally
judge a case. The album iudicum shall include the names of all the
assidui citizens that have been citizens of Nova Roma for over a year.

2. The number of iudices that shall make up the tribunalis (court of
justice) for a certain case shall be decided by the praetor according
to the following guidelines:

A. The tribunalis shall be composed of ten (10) iudices whenever the
intentio includes accusations of laesa patria (seriously threatening
the well-being of the Republic), bribery, embezzlement of public
funds, prevarication, electoral fraud, attacks to dignitas, slander
or libel, or all the crimes defined by the Lex Salicia Poenalis or
whenever the sententia might imply the loss of citizenship for one of
the parties.

FlGA: Apart from embezzlement of public funds which should be
pursued by the appropriate legal system in the country in which the
offender resides, I cannot see any reason to suspect that NR has much
to worry about with bribery and prevarication seems a bit vague
without specific examples. While it is possible to slander a fellow
citizen or make libelous remarks, it should be the job of the
Praetores to impose a penalty of moderation on the offending party.
That is one instance where "common sense" and "discretion" might be
appropriate.

B. In all other occasions, the tribunalis shall be composed of a
single iudex.

3. The praetor shall aleatorily take a number of names equal to the
number of iudices from the album iudicum. The following considera-
tions apply:

A. If the praetor considers that some of the iudices thus appointed
are obviously related by ties of interest to one of the parties, then
the praetor shall, at his own discretion, dismiss those iudices and
cast lots to appoint different iudices from the album iudicum.

B. A citizen thus appointed to a court shall be able to ask for an
exemption from that judicial work if there are factors that do not
allow him to serve in that position. The praetor must be asked for
that exemption within thirty-six (36) hours of the official
announcement of that appointment; the praetor shall grant that
exemption at his own discretion, or he shall deny it, thus forcing
the appointed iudex to serve or face an accusation of contempt.

C. Each party shall be able to dismiss a maximum of three (3)
iudices, forcing a new iudex to be aleatorily taken from the album
iudicum with each veto. Once both parties agree with a certain group
of iudices, or both have already used their three vetoes, the
remaining iudices shall be the final iudices, unless one of the
preceding paragraphs applies.

D. If both parties can agree on a certain citizen(s) of Nova Roma to
judge their case before a definitive group of legal iudices has been
appointed, then the praetor shall include that citizen (or those
citizens) among the iudices for the current case.

*VI. Iudicium*

1. SI IN IUS VOCAT, ITO.

Both parties must be present at the trial on the date set by the
Praetor. Any of the parties can choose to appoint an advocatus
(advocate or barrister) to speak for them in front of the iudices, or
they can choose to speak by themselves. An advocatus shall not
receive a fee for his services.


2. COM PERORANTO AMBO PRAESENTES:

Both Actor and Reus must be present in the court to speak; they shall
plead together in person.

3. POST MERIDIEM PRAESENTI LITEM ADDICITO

3.a If one of the parties does not appear on the date set by the
Praetor the Praetor shall adjudge the case, in favour of the one
present.

3.b If the Actor is not present at the trial on the date set by the
Praetor means that he or she renounces litigate and he or she loses
the right to address the Praetor's Court with the same case in
perpetuity and face an accusation of contempt.

FlGA: I regret to say that I find all this pseudo-legal balderdash
to be subject to my personal contempt. Fellow citizens, there has to
be a better way to resolve our disagreements other than edicta such
as this example.

3.c If the Reus is not present at the trial he or she automatically
loses the case because if the Reus does not offer a defense, then it
is non contendere and left to the Praetor to decide his sentence
because he has acquiesced to a verdict of guilt, and face an
accusation of contempt.

3.d If both parties do not appear on the date set by the Praetor the
Praetor they face an accusation of contempt.

3.e If one or both parties, for a justified and certified reason,
cannot appear on the date set by the Praetor, shall notify it in
advance at least 24 hours.

Having studied the causes, the Praetor may postpone the date of the
trial up to a month, setting a new date for holding in agreement with
the parties.

3.f The Praetor may, at his discretion, defer the trial if a
guarantor or vindex guarantees that the cause of non-appearance, by
the actor or Reus, is justified by unforeseen circumstances.

This vindex or guarantor will be fined if his sponsored party is not
present at trial on the new date set by Praetor.

4. PROCEDURES

A. A Once a tribunal has been appointed, the praetor shall inform
the iudices of the formula that they shall apply. The praetor shall
decide if the trial is going to be conducted under the public
scrutiny or, should the dignitas of innocents be at stake, declare a
secret summary and move the trial away from public scrutiny.

B. The actor shall present evidence to back his demands, and then
the reus shall present evidence to back his defense. Evidence shall
consist of anything that is relevant to the case, including written
texts, visual evidence, and the statements of witnesses or experts.
In the case of statements, each party shall have the right to ask
questions of the witnesses and experts presented by the other party.

C. If the Reus does not offer a defense, then it is non contendere
and left to the Praetor to decide his sentence because he has
acquiesced to a verdict of guilt.

D. The praetor shall be the final judge to determine what pieces of
evidence are relevant to the case.

E. Once both parties have presented their evidence, each party
shall have the opportunity to make one final statement in front of
the iudices, with the actor speaking in the first place. Then the
praetor shall call for a sententia (sentence) from the iudices,
according to Pars V of this Edict, reminding the iudices that, in
case of doubt, they must *not* condemn the reus.

*VII. Sententia*

1. Once the praetor has called for a sententia, the iudices shall
have seventy-two (72) hours to deliberate; within those seventy-two
(72) hours, the iudices shall individually issue one of the following
sentences:

a. ABSOLVO: if the tribunal's majority decision is "absolvo", the
reus shall be acquitted.

b. CONDEMNO: if the tribunal's majority decision is "condemno",
the reus shall be condemned according to the formula previously
established by the praetor.

c. Should there be a draw in the tribunal's votes, the reus
shall be acquitted.

2. Once all the iudices have issued their sententiae, the praetor
shall immediately inform the parties of the sententia, and shall
enforce any penalties through his imperium.

> *
> VIII. De Criminibus Poenisque*

1. The crimes and the penalties are listed in the Lex Salicia
Poenalis Pars Altera.

2. Iurisprudentia: in those cases where the laws do not present
an explicit treatment of a certain situation, a praetor shall create
iurisprudentia (jurisprudence) applicable to all similar situations.
Iurisprudentia is an expression of the Imperium of the praetor, and
it has the same legislative power as a praetorial edictum. Because of
this, laws approved by the Comitia shall always supersede
iurisprudentia, and a certain praetor can alter previous
iurisprudentia through an official edictum whenever common sense
dictates that such a course of action is necessary.

3. Breach of warranty provided by the Vindex: the Vindex may be
fined with no small amount equal to the taxes of one year and not
over US $ 30.00. The Vindex shall be counted among the capite censi
until the fine has been paid.

4. Contempt: The citizen accused of contempt may be fined with
no small amount equal to the taxes of two years and not over US $
100.00 and shall be counted among the capite censi until the fine has
been paid.

FlGA: I find again that such penalties as outline in this edictum to
be unenforcible and I believe that based upon the possibility of
violation of current national laws in the multiple jurisdictions that
compose Nova Roma, Inc., that the Tribunes should consider
intercessio against this edictum. Furthermore, I have yet to be
given a specific example of where the Constitution or our by-laws
gives the praetores the legal basis for assessing a financial penalty
upon any member of Nova Roma. This lack of evidence would also be
the basis for intercessio.


*IX. Appeal and Reduction of fines*

1. The sentenced citizen can appeal the fines for contempt before
the Praetores.

2. The fines for contempt may be reduced by up to 90%, at
discretion of the Praetores, in the case that the fined citizen
carry out the mandate or of the Praetores or of the Court

*X. Provocatione ad Populum*

1. In those cases where a sententia implies a loss of
citizenship, the reus shall have the right to publicly claim a
confirmation vote from the Comitia Centuriata within fifteen (15)
days after the issue of the sentence. Once the reus claims this
right, the consules shall call the Comitia Centuriata within fifteen
(15) days to vote upon the reus's expulsion. Should the Comitia
Centuriata confirm the sententia, the sententia shall be applied.
Should the Comitia Centuriata vote against the sententia, the
sententia shall be nullified.


2. In those cases where a sententia does not imply a loss of
citizenship, the reus shall have the right to publicly claim a
confirmation vote from the Comitia Populi Tributa within fifteen (15)
days after the issue of the sentence. Once the reus claims this
right, the consules shall call the Comitia Populi Tributa . Should
the Comitia Populi Tributa confirm the sententia, the sententia shall
be applied.
Should the Comitia Populi Tributa vote against the sententia, the
sententia shall be nullified.

*XI. Execution of Judgements*

To execute an incontestable judgement or a publicly certified
settlement, the Praetor may, on application of a party, call on all
legal expedients available to him. He may also call on the help of
all Magistrates of Nova Roma, who shall render such assistance as
they are reasonably able to do so. The violation of an oath falls
under the jusrisdiction of the collegia of the priesthood.

FlGA: The praetores have no legal right to call upon the Tribunes
since imperium is not superior to our sancrosanctus nor is an
praetorial edictum superior to the power of the Tribunes of the
People.


*XII. Effective Date of this Edictum*

This Edictum becomes effective immediately and will be in effect
until formal legislation is enacted by the Comitia.

Hoc edictum ilico valet.

Datum sub manibus nostris a.d. XV Kal. Ian. MMDCCLXI A.V.C.
M.Moravio T.Iulio cos.

M.Curiatius Complutensis
M. Iulius Severus
Praetores Novae Romae
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60017 From: M•IVL•SEVERVS Date: 2008-12-19
Subject: IO SATVRNALIA!
M. Iulius Severus quiritibus et omnibus: salutem plurimam dicunt:
 
Io Triumphe! Io Saturnalia!
 
Valete optime,

M•IVL•SEVERVS

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60018 From: Publius Memmius Albucius Date: 2008-12-19
Subject: Re: Battle on the Trebbia
Salve Consul et omnes !

Just a reminder of the article issued by Gallia webzine "Quirinus" on
the battle of Trebbia, at:

http://www.quirites.org/quirinus03A08.htm

and which gives several tracks on the battle, the location of the
camps, the amount of the troops, Hannibal's tactics, etc..

Vale bene, et omnes,


P. Memmius Albucius
leg. pp. Galliae


--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "marcushoratius" <MHoratius@...>
wrote:
>
> M. Moravius Piscinus salutem:
>
> Yesterday I forgot to mention that it was the anniversary of the
> Battle of Trebbia. It was the first major battle of the Second
Punic
> War. There had been skirmishes before this. It was the only
battle
> in which Hannible had elephants to deploy. All of the elephants
that
> crossed the Alps, save for the bull elephant Sura, died in the days
> following this battle, due to cold and disease.
>
> The Roman commander, T. Sempronius Longus, was anxious to win
himself
> glory in the final days of his term of office. And thus he pushed
> his troops forward, when he should probably have taken a defensive
> position. He sent his four legions forward, across the freezing
> waters of the channels of the Trebbia, before they were able to
have
> their breakfast. Snow and sleet came down from the slopes of the
> Alps right in the faces of the Romans, and from behind the
> Carthaginians. Then it began to rain, so that the Roman army of
> heavy infantry became bogged down as the Carthaginian light
infantry
> and Numidian cavalry were able to engage them with missles. All
> around it was a very bad day for Sempronius and his army. This is
> the account given by Livy:
>
> a. d. XV Kal. Ian. AUC 535 / 18 Dec. 218 BCE: Battle of Trebbia
>
> "After sending Mago with his 1000 infantry and 1000 cavalry to take
> up his position, Hannibal gave orders for the Numidian cavalry to
> cross the Trebia in the early dawn and ride up to the gates of the
> Roman camp; then they were to discharge their missiles on the
> outposts and so goad the enemy on to battle. When the fighting had
> once started they were gradually to give ground and draw their
> pursuers to their own side of the river. These were the
instructions
> to the Numidians; the other commanders, both infantry and cavalry,
> were ordered to see that all their men had breakfast, after which
> they were to wait for the signal, the men fully armed, the horses
> saddled and ready. Eager for battle, and having already made up his
> mind to fight, Sempronius (Longus) led out the whole of his cavalry
> to meet the Numidian attack, for it was in his cavalry that he
placed
> most confidence; these were followed by 6000 infantry and at last
the
> whole of his force marched on to the field. It happened to be the
> season of winter, a snowstorm was raging, and the district,
situated
> between the Alps and the Apennines, was rendered especially cold by
> the vicinity of rivers and marshes. To make matters worse, men and
> horses alike had been hurriedly sent forward, without any food,
> without any protection against the cold, so they had no heat in
them
> and the chilling blasts from the river made the cold still more
> severe as they approached it in their pursuit of the Numidians. But
> when they entered the water which had been swollen by the night's
> rain and was then breast high, their limbs became stiff with cold,
> and when they emerged on the other side they had hardly strength to
> hold their weapons; they began to grow faint from fatigue and as
the
> day wore on, from hunger.
>
> "Hannibal's men, meanwhile, had made fires in front of their tents,
> oil had been distributed amongst the maniples for them to make
their
> joints and limbs supple and they had time for an ample repast. When
> it was announced that the enemy had crossed the river they took
their
> arms, feeling alert and active in mind and body, and marched to
> battle. The Balearic and light-armed infantry were posted in front
of
> the standards; they numbered about 8000; behind them the heavy-
armed
> infantry, the mainstay and backbone of the army; on the flanks
> Hannibal distributed the cavalry, and outside them, again, the
> elephants. When the consul saw his cavalry, who had lost their
order
> in the pursuit, suddenly meeting with an unsuspected resistance
from
> the Numidians, he recalled them by signal and received them within
> his infantry. There were 18,000 Romans, 20,000 Latin allies, and an
> auxiliary force of Cenomani, the only Gallic tribe which had
remained
> faithful. These were the forces engaged. The Balearics and light
> infantry opened the battle, but on being met by the heavier legions
> they were rapidly withdrawn to the wings, an evolution which at
once
> threw the Roman horse into difficulties, for the 4000 wearied
> troopers had been unable to offer an effective resistance to 10,000
> who were fresh and vigorous, and now in addition they were
> overwhelmed by what seemed a cloud of missiles from the light
> infantry. Moreover, the elephants, towering aloft at the ends of
the
> line, terrified the horses not only by their appearance but by
their
> unaccustomed smell, and created widespread panic. The infantry
> battle, as far as the Romans were concerned, was maintained more by
> courage than by physical strength, for the Carthaginians, who had
> shortly before been getting themselves into trim, brought their
> powers fresh and unimpaired into action, whilst the Romans were
> fatigued and hungry and stiff with cold. Still, their courage would
> have kept them up had it been only infantry that they were fighting
> against. But the light infantry, after repulsing the cavalry, were
> hurling their missiles on the flanks of the legions; the elephants
> had now come up against the centre of the Roman line, and Mago and
> his Numidians, as soon as it had passed their ambuscade, rose up in
> the rear and created a terrible disorder and panic. Yet in spite of
> all the dangers which surrounded them, the ranks stood firm and
> immovable for some time, even, contrary to all expectation, against
> the elephants. Some skirmishers who had been placed where they
could
> attack these animals flung darts at them and drove them off, and
> rushed after them, stabbing them under their tails, where the skin
is
> soft and easily penetrated.
>
> "Maddened with pain and terror, they were beginning to rush wildly
on
> their own men, when Hannibal ordered them to be driven away to the
> left wing against the auxiliary Gauls on the Roman right. There
they
> instantly produced unmistakable panic and flight, and the Romans
had
> fresh cause for .alarm when they saw their auxiliaries routed. They
> now stood fighting in a square, and about 10,000 of them, unable to
> escape in any other direction, forced their way through the centre
of
> the African troops and the auxiliary Gauls who supported them and
> inflicted an immense loss on the enemy. They were prevented by the
> river from returning to their camp, and the rain made it impossible
> for them to judge where they could best go to the assistance of
their
> comrades, so they marched away straight to Placentia. Then
desperate
> attempts to escape were made on all sides; some who made for the
> river were swept away by the current or caught by the enemy while
> hesitating to cross; others, scattered over the fields in flight,
> followed the track of the main retreat and sought Placentia;
others,
> fearing the enemy more than the river, crossed it and reached their
> camp. The driving sleet and the intolerable cold caused the death
of
> many men and baggage animals, and nearly all the elephants
perished.
> The Carthaginians stopped their pursuit at the banks of the Trebia
> and returned to their camp so benumbed with cold that they hardly
> felt any joy in their victory." ~ Titus Livius 21.54-56
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60019 From: Complutensis Date: 2008-12-19
Subject: Re: Edictum Praetorium Curiatio-Iulio de Iurisdictione Praetoris -

Curiatius Complutensis Praetor Galerio Aureliano Tribuno civibusque SPD

 

FlGA: I believe that "...the law.." should be changed to "NR law"  and/or that an addendum be included that states, beyond any doubt,  that NR law cannot infringe upon the macronational laws ………

MCC: Really are you saying that  that I should change the letter of the Constitution? The entire paragraph commented by you is a copy-paste of the text of our Constitution. If you wish change the Constitution you know what are the ways to do it.

 

FlGA: Providing that the Praetores also quote the appropriate legal  basis for their intercessio.

 

MCC: According the Constitution IV.3.d

 

FlGA: Again it needs to be insured that "law" means that macronational law cannot be violated by an NR law.

 

MCC: The paragrah is:

 

“The Comitia Curiatia invest elected Praetores with Imperium , which  is necessary to employ Coercitio, interpret and execute law” extrated from the Constitution III.A

 

Another time I should say that the Praetores cannot change the Constitution. Patres Patriae and Senate drafted the laws of Nova Roma so they do no conflict with any macronational law. If you think that we, the Nova Romans,  should modify the NR Constitution this ML is not the correct way.

 

FlGA: ………………….I believe that this subject should be discussed by all appropriate parties. I believe that the Praetores should have the legal power to moderate an offending citizen but I fail to understand where their power to impose monetary penalties upon a citizen is derived or how such penalties are to be calculated.

 

MCC: Well this is your opinion. But please explain me: what penalties are appropiate to moderate an offending citizen?  A verbal reprimand? There are moments when we must demonstrate that this is not a game and that all must respect the existing rules and that is why in these moments we must impose penalties that go beyond mere verbal reprimand.

 

FlGA: Again I must say that I have always interpreted praetorial  sanctions to be limited to moderation of the lists. I do not believe that other penalties are clearly provided for in the collective Constitution & by-laws of our corporation.

 

MCC: Again is your personal interpretation. The Constitution and the leges are clear on this point: the praetorial sanctions are not limited to moderation of the list.

 

FlGA: I definitely oppose this statement since I do not believe that "discretion" should be a basis for by-laws, since such legal by-laws would prevent the need for discretion except as spelled out in a by-law.

 

MCC: Why you oppose that  “Procedures and cases not covered explicitly in this Edictum or in the Leges of Nova Roma shall be solved at the discretion of the
Praetor?   The discretion of magistrates to solve procedures and cases not covered explicitly in the laws (macro and micronational laws)  is legally recognized in almost all countries of the world,  is one of the basis of the ancient Roman Law and was recognized by the Nova Roman iurisprudentia.

 

I am used to propose alternatives when I object to something and I think that you should propose an alternative to this wording.

 

I do not want to bore all citizens, refuting point by point each and every one of your words, it can only lead to a sterile discussion.

The power of law without coercitio is not law: it is nothing.

The law needs to be voluntarily respected, but we all know that not all voluntarily comply with the law, therefore the law must be reinforced with action and possible sanctions to compel compliance.

 

It's just my personal opinion as citizen, as plebeian and as former Tribunus Plebis: if Tribuni decide to veto this edict they will make a poor service to our community.

 

I really hope and trust that the Tribuni will understand that this may be a first step in making a better Nova Roma without differences between us with nobody above the law.

 

Curate ut valete

 

M·CVR·COMPLVTENSIS
Praetor Novae Romae

Senator
Praetor Hispaniae
Scriba Censoris K·F·B·M

 

 

P.S.:

 

EDICT: To execute an incontestable judgement or a publicly certified settlement, the Praetor may, on application of a party, call on all legal expedients available to him. He may also call on the help of  all Magistrates of Nova Roma, who shall render such assistance as they are reasonably able to do so.


FlGA: The praetores have no legal right to call upon the Tribunes since imperium is not superior to our sancrosanctus nor is an praetorial edictum superior to the power of the Tribunes of the People.

MCC:  Yes, the Praetor may also call on the help of all Magistrates of Nova Roma except the Tribunes.

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60020 From: Robert Levee Date: 2008-12-19
Subject: Re: Edictum Praetorium Curiatio-Iulio de Iurisdictione Praetoris -
Salve,Honorable Fl.Galerius Aurelianus S.P.D.

As a Tribunis Plebis I find this Edictum is in contradiction of the NR Constitution, and also feel that this matter needs to be addressed in a more detailed manner, and demonstrated to be in line with the Constitution and by-laws of Nova Roma

If it stands as written, I will join you in a pronouncement of intercessio.

Vale,
Ap. Galerius Aurelianus


--- On Fri, 12/19/08, Patrick D. Owen <Patrick.Owen@...> wrote:

> From: Patrick D. Owen <Patrick.Owen@...>
> Subject: [Nova-Roma] Edictum Praetorium Curiatio-Iulio de Iurisdictione Praetoris - Responsum Fl.GA
> To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> Date: Friday, December 19, 2008, 11:39 AM
> Edictum Praetorium Curiatio-Iulio de Iurisdictione Praetoris
> -
> Opinion of Fl. Galerius Aurelianus Tribunus Plebis
>
> Fl. Galerius Aurelianus S.P.D.
>
> I have made a number of comments in response to this
> edictum. I
> encourage the praetores to withdraw it until they can
> demonstrate the
> basis for some of their points to the satisfaction of
> myself and my
> fellow Tribunes. If this edictum stands as written, I will
> consider
> the pronouncement of intercessio on the basis that it is
> not in
> agreement with several specific points of the NR
> Constitution and the
> by-laws of Nova Roma.
>
> Several comments that I have made are my personal opinion
> and should
> not be considered to be legal objections. The Leges
> Saliciae
> Iudiciaria et Poenalis are legally in force and I must
> defend them by
> my oath of office; however much I believe that they should
> be
> eliminated or moderated by new actions in the Senate and
> the
> Assemblies.
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, MCC
> <complutensis@...> wrote:
> >
> > *Praefatio*
>
> Praetores
>
> Two praetors are elected by the Comitia Centuriata to serve
> a term
> lasting one year. They shall have the following honors,
> powers, and
> obligations:
>
> a. To hold Imperium and have the honor of being preceded by
> six
> lictors;
>
> b. To issue those edicta (edicts) necessary to engage in
> those tasks
> which advance the mission and function of Nova Roma and to
> administer
> the law (such edicts being binding upon themselves as well
> as others);
>
> FlGA: I believe that "...the law.." should be
> changed to "NR law"
> and/or that an addendum be included that states, beyond any
> doubt,
> that NR law cannot infringe upon the macronational laws
> & protections
> of a member. I bring this up since the SC that made
> privately owned
> lists the legal property of NR was blantantly illegal and
> violated
> the spirit and letter of the Yahoo Groups rules as well as
> the U.S.
> laws/international laws regarding ownership of a website
> unless that
> website or list was established ex officio.
>
> c. To call the Senate, the comitia centuriata, and the
> comitia populi
> tributa to order when the Consuls are unavailable;
>
> d. To pronounce intercessio against another praetor or
> magistrate of
> lesser authority;
>
> FlGA: Providing that the Praetores also quote the
> appropriate legal
> basis for their intercessio.
>
> e. To appoint scribae (clerks) to assist with
> administrative and
> other tasks, as they shall see fit.
>
> (Extract from Constitution of Nova Roma IV.A.3)
>
>
> *Imperium*
>
> The Comitia Curiatia invest elected Praetores with Imperium
> , which
> is necessary to employ Coercitio, interpret and execute law
>
> FlGA: Again it needs to be insured that "law"
> means that
> macronational law cannot be violated by an NR law.
>
> (Extract from Constitution of Nova Roma III.A)
>
> In Nova Roma, we understand Imperium as:
>
> A. Having all the rights of potestas
>
> B. Ius agendi cum populo, calling the People to vote in any
> of their
> legislative Comitia.
>
> C. Ius agendi cum senatu, calling to Senate to vote or
> placing a
> proposed senatus consultum on the Senate agenda.
>
> D. Ius coercendi maior, the power to compel obedience using
> major
> force, on all Nova Roma subjects. In Nova Roma, this
> explicitly
> excludes physical force, and includes the force of law.
>
> FlGA: Considering the debacle that occurred in the case of
> LECA, I
> believe that this subject should be discussed by all
> appropriate
> parties. I believe that the Praetores should have the
> legal power to
> moderate an offending citizen but I fail to understand
> where their
> power to impose monetary penalties upon a citizen is
> derived or how
> such penalties are to be calculated.
>
> E. Full iurisdictio, the power to interpret the law, on all
> levels on
> all Nova Roma subjects.
>
> (Extract from Lex Arminia de Imperio)
>
>
> *Coercitio*
>
> The power of coercitio is the power of the Praetores to
> impose
> sanctions on those who (by their conduct) hinder and/or
> jeopardize
> the purposes of administration of justice.
>
> FlGA: Again I must say that I have always interpreted
> praetorial
> sanctions to be limited to moderation of the lists. I do
> not believe
> that other penalties are clearly provided for in the
> collective
> Constitution & by-laws of our corporation.
>
> > *
> > I. Intent of this Edictum*
>
> 1. The intent of this edict, based on the Republican Roman
> Law, is
> to complement our Leges Saliciae Iudiciaria et Poenalis for
> cases not
> covered explicitly in them, and is based in the Imperium of
> the
> Praetores, thus intending to fulfill article IV.A.3.b. of
> the
> Constitution of Nova Roma.
>
> 2. Procedures and cases not covered explicitly in this
> Edictum or in
> the Leges of Nova Roma shall be solved at the discretion of
> the
> Praetor.
>
> FlGA: I definitely oppose this statement since I do not
> believe
> that "discretion" should be a basis for by-laws,
> since such legal by-
> laws would prevent the need for discretion except as
> spelled out in a
> by-law.
>
> *II. Entitlement to action, formal requirements, scope of a
> civil
> suit*
>
> A. Opposing parties
>
> 1. Each citizen of Nova Roma has the right, without
> discrimination
> as regards status, reputation or duration of citizenship,
> to seek a
> remedy at the Praetor´s court as plaintiff in civil
> suits. According
> the Lex Salicia Iudiciaria the plaintiff shall be addressed
> in this
> edictum as "actor". The defendant shall be
> addressed as "reus".
>
> 2. Actor and Reus may be represented by another citizen
> (advocate).
> To appoint an advocate a party has to submit a written
> notice to the
> Praetor. This notice may be part of the statement of claim.
> The
> notice has to relate to all hearings and procedures.
>
> B. Editio Actionis
>
> The actor must announce the action he is intending to exert
> to one of
> the praetores ("editio actionis"), and then the
> actor must ask the
> praetor to start the procedure ("petitio
> actionis"). The written
> statement of claim has to be transmitted to the Praetor
> directly, via
> e-mail or other suitable ways, with the following formal
> requirements:
>
> 1. Actor, Reus, advocates and witnesses have to be
> identified with
> full legal Roman name.
>
> 2. The statement of claim must consist of the facts of the
> case, the
> offering of available proof, the applicable law, supporting
> arguments
> for the application of law on the facts of the case.
>
> *III. Admissibility of claim*
>
> A. The Praetor acknowledges the receipt of the claim to the
> Actor.
>
> B. The praetor shall decide, within 72 hours, if the
> petitio actionis
> shall be presented to a court or if it shall be dismissed.
> A praetor
> can dismiss a petitio actionis if and only if one of the
> following
> situations applies:
>
> B.a. The praetor has no competence in the issue.
>
> Example: a praetor can not mediate between two foreign
> parties, for
> his competence is limited to the citizens of Nova Roma.
>
> B.b. The parties are not sui iuris in Nova Roma.
>
> Example: a minor can not play the part of an actor.
>
> B.c. The claim is incongruent.
>
> Example: "Ticius must be expelled from Nova Roma
> because he is
> bearded" is an incongruent claim, for it is not
> supported by law,
> precedent or common sense.
>
> C. If the claim is dismissed by the praetores, the actor
> shall be
> able to present his case again to the praetores in the
> future,
> waiting for two new praetores to be elected by the Comitia
> if
> necessary.
>
> D. If the claim is approved by the praetores, it shall be
> presented
> to a court of justice defined according to this law. The
> reus shall
> be informed of the nature of the claim presented against
> him and of
> the identity of the actor within thirty-six (36) hours
> after the
> claim's approval. The Reus is then obliged to
> "make an appearance".
> To comply with this obligation the Reus has to transmit an
> answering
> statement with the same formal requirements as for the
> Actor's
> statement to the Praetor within one week after its receipt.
> If the
> Reus so applies, the Praetor may prolong the time limit for
> the
> transmission of the statement. By failing to transmit a
> statement
> within the prescribed time limit the Reus automatically
> loses the
> case. The Praetor will then render a judgement confirming
> the claim
> of the Actor without first appointing a Iudex or iudices.
>
> E. The Reus may acknowledge the claim. In this case the
> Praetor
> confirms it by a publicly certified settlement. The
> settlement has to
> be announced to the parties and both parties then have to
> swear a
> written oath on the settlement. The publically certified
> settlement
> and the written oath will be entered into a public record.
>
> F. If the Actor withdraws his claim before judgement, he or
> she loses
> the right to address the Praetor's Court with the same
> case in
> perpetuity. If the Actor presents new evidence, which is
> material to
> the claim itself, the Praetor decides, by his discretion,
> if the
> presented evidence are sufficient enough to approve the
> claim again.
>
> *IV. Formula*
>
> According the Lex Salicia Iudiciaria:
>
> 1. Once a claim has been accepted by a praetor, that same
> praetor
> shall prepare a formula to present to the iudices. The
> formula shall
> consist of a logical statement that instructs the iudices
> on the
> decision they must take. The formula shall be structured
> into four
> parts: institutio iudicis, intentio, demonstratio and
> condemnatio. An
> explanation of each part follows:
>
> A. INSTITVTIO IVDICIS: This clause appoints a certain
> iudex to
> judge the case (see below).
>
> B. INTENTIO: This part expresses the claim of the actor;
> i.e., it
> shall express what the actor seeks by petitioning the
> praetor. There
> are two kinds of intentio: intentio certa, when the facts
> that lead
> to the actor's claim are so obvious that they do not
> need to be
> proved, and intentio incerta, when the actor must prove the
> facts
> that justify his claim. Example: Intentio Certa:
> "According to the
> contract signed by Titius..." Intentio Incerta:
> "If it is proved that
> Ticius owes Gaius 1,000 sestertii, Gaius shall pay Ticius
> that same
> amount".
>
> C. DEMONSTRATIO: This is the clause that further defines
> an
> intentio incerta.
>
> D. CONDEMNATIO: This is the clause that allows the
> iudices to
> condemn or absolve.
>
> Example: a formula could be something like this: "Let
> Sulpicius be
> the iudex. If it is proved that Ticius owes Gaius 1,000
> sestertii,
> you, iudex, shall condemn Ticius to pay 1,000 sestertii to
> Gaius;
> else, you shall acquit Ticius."
>
> The clauses would be: Institutio Iudicis: "Let
> Sulpicius be the
> iudex."
> Demonstratio: "If it is proved that ..."
> Intentio: "... Ticius owes
> Gaius 1,000 sestertii ..." Condemnatio: "... you,
> iudex, shall
> condemn Ticius to pay 1,000 sestertii to Gaius; otherwise,
> you shall
> acquit Ticius."
>
> 2. To write down a formula, a praetor shall use one of
> these
> sources as a basis:
>
> A. Lex: the intentio and the condemnatio shall never be in
> disagreement with the current laws of Nova Roma. They must
> follow
> these laws when the situation is explicitly treated by
> them.
>
> B. Iurisprudentia: in those cases where the laws do not
> present an
> explicit treatment of a certain situation, a praetor shall
> create
> iurisprudentia (jurisprudence) applicable to all similar
> situations.
> Iurisprudentia is an expression of the Imperium of the
> praetor, and
> it has the same legislative power as a praetorial edictum.
> Because of
> this, laws approved by the Comitia shall always supersede
> iurisprudentia, and a certain praetor can alter previous
> iurisprudentia through an official edictum whenever common
> sense
> dictates that such a course of action is necessary.
>
> FlGA: Is there anyone in NR besides myself who believes
> that the
> Leges Saliciae Iudiciaria et Poenalis is just too much for
> a
> primarily internet organization? I believe the time has
> come for NR
> to rid itself of these cumbersome leges and replace them
> with
> something that limits such "legal" cases to
> moderation of those who
> by insulting language or inappropriate posts AND actions
> involving
> the Macellum. Personally, I believe that since the
> penalties of a
> legal judicial system in NR cannot be legally enforced.
> The only
> genuine penalties that can be enforced is moderation on all
> NR lists,
> permanent banning from one or more lists, and expulsion
> from Nova
> Roma "for the good of the organization."
>
> *V. The Iudices*
>
> According the Lex Salicia Iudiciaria:
>
> 1. Once the formula is ready, iudices (judges) shall be
> appointed
> from the album iudicum, a list of all the citizens that can
> legally
> judge a case. The album iudicum shall include the names of
> all the
> assidui citizens that have been citizens of Nova Roma for
> over a year.
>
> 2. The number of iudices that shall make up the tribunalis
> (court of
> justice) for a certain case shall be decided by the praetor
> according
> to the following guidelines:
>
> A. The tribunalis shall be composed of ten (10) iudices
> whenever the
> intentio includes accusations of laesa patria (seriously
> threatening
> the well-being of the Republic), bribery, embezzlement of
> public
> funds, prevarication, electoral fraud, attacks to dignitas,
> slander
> or libel, or all the crimes defined by the Lex Salicia
> Poenalis or
> whenever the sententia might imply the loss of citizenship
> for one of
> the parties.
>
> FlGA: Apart from embezzlement of public funds which should
> be
> pursued by the appropriate legal system in the country in
> which the
> offender resides, I cannot see any reason to suspect that
> NR has much
> to worry about with bribery and prevarication seems a bit
> vague
> without specific examples. While it is possible to slander
> a fellow
> citizen or make libelous remarks, it should be the job of
> the
> Praetores to impose a penalty of moderation on the
> offending party.
> That is one instance where "common sense" and
> "discretion" might be
> appropriate.
>
> B. In all other occasions, the tribunalis shall be composed
> of a
> single iudex.
>
> 3. The praetor shall aleatorily take a number of names
> equal to the
> number of iudices from the album iudicum. The following
> considera-
> tions apply:
>
> A. If the praetor considers that some of the iudices thus
> appointed
> are obviously related by ties of interest to one of the
> parties, then
> the praetor shall, at his own discretion, dismiss those
> iudices and
> cast lots to appoint different iudices from the album
> iudicum.
>
> B. A citizen thus appointed to a court shall be able to ask
> for an
> exemption from that judicial work if there are factors that
> do not
> allow him to serve in that position. The praetor must be
> asked for
> that exemption within thirty-six (36) hours of the official
>
> announcement of that appointment; the praetor shall grant
> that
> exemption at his own discretion, or he shall deny it, thus
> forcing
> the appointed iudex to serve or face an accusation of
> contempt.
>
> C. Each party shall be able to dismiss a maximum of three
> (3)
> iudices, forcing a new iudex to be aleatorily taken from
> the album
> iudicum with each veto. Once both parties agree with a
> certain group
> of iudices, or both have already used their three vetoes,
> the
> remaining iudices shall be the final iudices, unless one of
> the
> preceding paragraphs applies.
>
> D. If both parties can agree on a certain citizen(s) of
> Nova Roma to
> judge their case before a definitive group of legal iudices
> has been
> appointed, then the praetor shall include that citizen (or
> those
> citizens) among the iudices for the current case.
>
> *VI. Iudicium*
>
> 1. SI IN IUS VOCAT, ITO.
>
> Both parties must be present at the trial on the date set
> by the
> Praetor. Any of the parties can choose to appoint an
> advocatus
> (advocate or barrister) to speak for them in front of the
> iudices, or
> they can choose to speak by themselves. An advocatus shall
> not
> receive a fee for his services.
>
>
> 2. COM PERORANTO AMBO PRAESENTES:
>
> Both Actor and Reus must be present in the court to speak;
> they shall
> plead together in person.
>
> 3. POST MERIDIEM PRAESENTI LITEM ADDICITO
>
> 3.a If one of the parties does not appear on the date set
> by the
> Praetor the Praetor shall adjudge the case, in favour of
> the one
> present.
>
> 3.b If the Actor is not present at the trial on the date
> set by the
> Praetor means that he or she renounces litigate and he or
> she loses
> the right to address the Praetor's Court with the same
> case in
> perpetuity and face an accusation of contempt.
>
> FlGA: I regret to say that I find all this pseudo-legal
> balderdash
> to be subject to my personal contempt. Fellow citizens,
> there has to
> be a better way to resolve our disagreements other than
> edicta such
> as this example.
>
> 3.c If the Reus is not present at the trial he or she
> automatically
> loses the case because if the Reus does not offer a
> defense, then it
> is non contendere and left to the Praetor to decide his
> sentence
> because he has acquiesced to a verdict of guilt, and face
> an
> accusation of contempt.
>
> 3.d If both parties do not appear on the date set by the
> Praetor the
> Praetor they face an accusation of contempt.
>
> 3.e If one or both parties, for a justified and certified
> reason,
> cannot appear on the date set by the Praetor, shall notify
> it in
> advance at least 24 hours.
>
> Having studied the causes, the Praetor may postpone the
> date of the
> trial up to a month, setting a new date for holding in
> agreement with
> the parties.
>
> 3.f The Praetor may, at his discretion, defer the trial if
> a
> guarantor or vindex guarantees that the cause of
> non-appearance, by
> the actor or Reus, is justified by unforeseen
> circumstances.
>
> This vindex or guarantor will be fined if his sponsored
> party is not
> present at trial on the new date set by Praetor.
>
> 4. PROCEDURES
>
> A. A Once a tribunal has been appointed, the praetor
> shall inform
> the iudices of the formula that they shall apply. The
> praetor shall
> decide if the trial is going to be conducted under the
> public
> scrutiny or, should the dignitas of innocents be at stake,
> declare a
> secret summary and move the trial away from public
> scrutiny.
>
> B. The actor shall present evidence to back his demands,
> and then
> the reus shall present evidence to back his defense.
> Evidence shall
> consist of anything that is relevant to the case, including
> written
> texts, visual evidence, and the statements of witnesses or
> experts.
> In the case of statements, each party shall have the right
> to ask
> questions of the witnesses and experts presented by the
> other party.
>
> C. If the Reus does not offer a defense, then it is non
> contendere
> and left to the Praetor to decide his sentence because he
> has
> acquiesced to a verdict of guilt.
>
> D. The praetor shall be the final judge to determine what
> pieces of
> evidence are relevant to the case.
>
> E. Once both parties have presented their evidence, each
> party
> shall have the opportunity to make one final statement in
> front of
> the iudices, with the actor speaking in the first place.
> Then the
> praetor shall call for a sententia (sentence) from the
> iudices,
> according to Pars V of this Edict, reminding the iudices
> that, in
> case of doubt, they must *not* condemn the reus.
>
> *VII. Sententia*
>
> 1. Once the praetor has called for a sententia, the
> iudices shall
> have seventy-two (72) hours to deliberate; within those
> seventy-two
> (72) hours, the iudices shall individually issue one of the
> following
> sentences:
>
> a. ABSOLVO: if the tribunal's majority decision is
> "absolvo", the
> reus shall be acquitted.
>
> b. CONDEMNO: if the tribunal's majority decision is
> "condemno",
> the reus shall be condemned according to the formula
> previously
> established by the praetor.
>
> c. Should there be a draw in the tribunal's votes,
> the reus
> shall be acquitted.
>
> 2. Once all the iudices have issued their sententiae,
> the praetor
> shall immediately inform the parties of the sententia, and
> shall
> enforce any penalties through his imperium.
>
> > *
> > VIII. De Criminibus Poenisque*
>
> 1. The crimes and the penalties are listed in the Lex
> Salicia
> Poenalis Pars Altera.
>
> 2. Iurisprudentia: in those cases where the laws do not
> present
> an explicit treatment of a certain situation, a praetor
> shall create
> iurisprudentia (jurisprudence) applicable to all similar
> situations.
> Iurisprudentia is an expression of the Imperium of the
> praetor, and
> it has the same legislative power as a praetorial edictum.
> Because of
> this, laws approved by the Comitia shall always supersede
> iurisprudentia, and a certain praetor can alter previous
> iurisprudentia through an official edictum whenever common
> sense
> dictates that such a course of action is necessary.
>
> 3. Breach of warranty provided by the Vindex: the
> Vindex may be
> fined with no small amount equal to the taxes of one year
> and not
> over US $ 30.00. The Vindex shall be counted among the
> capite censi
> until the fine has been paid.
>
> 4. Contempt: The citizen accused of contempt may be
> fined with
> no small amount equal to the taxes of two years and not
> over US $
> 100.00 and shall be counted among the capite censi until
> the fine has
> been paid.
>
> FlGA: I find again that such penalties as outline in this
> edictum to
> be unenforcible and I believe that based upon the
> possibility of
> violation of current national laws in the multiple
> jurisdictions that
> compose Nova Roma, Inc., that the Tribunes should consider
> intercessio against this edictum. Furthermore, I have yet
> to be
> given a specific example of where the Constitution or our
> by-laws
> gives the praetores the legal basis for assessing a
> financial penalty
> upon any member of Nova Roma. This lack of evidence would
> also be
> the basis for intercessio.
>
>
> *IX. Appeal and Reduction of fines*
>
> 1. The sentenced citizen can appeal the fines for
> contempt before
> the Praetores.
>
> 2. The fines for contempt may be reduced by up to 90%,
> at
> discretion of the Praetores, in the case that the fined
> citizen
> carry out the mandate or of the Praetores or of the Court
>
> *X. Provocatione ad Populum*
>
> 1. In those cases where a sententia implies a loss of
> citizenship, the reus shall have the right to publicly
> claim a
> confirmation vote from the Comitia Centuriata within
> fifteen (15)
> days after the issue of the sentence. Once the reus claims
> this
> right, the consules shall call the Comitia Centuriata
> within fifteen
> (15) days to vote upon the reus's expulsion. Should the
> Comitia
> Centuriata confirm the sententia, the sententia shall be
> applied.
> Should the Comitia Centuriata vote against the sententia,
> the
> sententia shall be nullified.
>
>
> 2. In those cases where a sententia does not imply a
> loss of
> citizenship, the reus shall have the right to publicly
> claim a
> confirmation vote from the Comitia Populi Tributa within
> fifteen (15)
> days after the issue of the sentence. Once the reus claims
> this
> right, the consules shall call the Comitia Populi Tributa .
> Should
> the Comitia Populi Tributa confirm the sententia, the
> sententia shall
> be applied.
> Should the Comitia Populi Tributa vote against the
> sententia, the
> sententia shall be nullified.
>
> *XI. Execution of Judgements*
>
> To execute an incontestable judgement or a publicly
> certified
> settlement, the Praetor may, on application of a party,
> call on all
> legal expedients available to him. He may also call on the
> help of
> all Magistrates of Nova Roma, who shall render such
> assistance as
> they are reasonably able to do so. The violation of an oath
> falls
> under the jusrisdiction of the collegia of the priesthood.
>
> FlGA: The praetores have no legal right to call upon the
> Tribunes
> since imperium is not superior to our sancrosanctus nor is
> an
> praetorial edictum superior to the power of the Tribunes of
> the
> People.
>
>
> *XII. Effective Date of this Edictum*
>
> This Edictum becomes effective immediately and will be in
> effect
> until formal legislation is enacted by the Comitia.
>
> Hoc edictum ilico valet.
>
> Datum sub manibus nostris a.d. XV Kal. Ian. MMDCCLXI A.V.C.
> M.Moravio T.Iulio cos.
>
> M.Curiatius Complutensis
> M. Iulius Severus
> Praetores Novae Romae
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60021 From: M•IVL•SEVERVS Date: 2008-12-19
Subject: Re: Edictum Praetorium Curiatio-Iulio de Iurisdictione Praetoris -
M. Iulius Severus Ap. Galerio Aureliano omnibusque sal.
 
You could start by offering real legal proof and evidence that our Edictum "is in contradiction of the NR Constitution", as you put it.
But we are ready to follow all the legal proceedings needed to stand by our Edictum.
 
Vale, et valete,

M•IVL•SEVERVS
PRÆTOR•NOVÆ•ROMÆ

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60022 From: Lucia Livia Plauta Date: 2008-12-19
Subject: Re: Edictum Praetorium Curiatio-Iulio de Iurisdictione Praetoris -
L. Livia Plauta Fl. Galerio Aureliano et Ap. Galerio Aureliano S.P.D.

Will please someone explain to me exactly where an edict half of
which consist in quotations from the Constitution is against the
Constitution?
Please provide the offending paragraph of the edict and the relevant
paragraph of the Constitution that's being offended.

Don't all edicts expire at the end of the year anyway?

I agree that the leges saliciae need to be abolished or at least
deeply reformed, as I said at the very beginning of this year, but
this is not a matter to be discussed in the last few weeks of the
year. It will take time to deal with it properly after the new
magistrates are in office.

Valete,
Livia

>
> Salve,Honorable Fl.Galerius Aurelianus S.P.D.
>
> As a Tribunis Plebis I find this Edictum is in contradiction of the
NR Constitution, and also feel that this matter needs to be addressed
in a more detailed manner, and demonstrated to be in line with the
Constitution and by-laws of Nova Roma
>
> If it stands as written, I will join you in a pronouncement of
intercessio.
>
> Vale,
> Ap. Galerius Aurelianus
>
>
> --- On Fri, 12/19/08, Patrick D. Owen <Patrick.Owen@...> wrote:
>
> > From: Patrick D. Owen <Patrick.Owen@...>
> > Subject: [Nova-Roma] Edictum Praetorium Curiatio-Iulio de
Iurisdictione Praetoris - Responsum Fl.GA
> > To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> > Date: Friday, December 19, 2008, 11:39 AM
> > Edictum Praetorium Curiatio-Iulio de Iurisdictione Praetoris
> > -
> > Opinion of Fl. Galerius Aurelianus Tribunus Plebis
> >
> > Fl. Galerius Aurelianus S.P.D.
> >
> > I have made a number of comments in response to this
> > edictum. I
> > encourage the praetores to withdraw it until they can
> > demonstrate the
> > basis for some of their points to the satisfaction of
> > myself and my
> > fellow Tribunes. If this edictum stands as written, I will
> > consider
> > the pronouncement of intercessio on the basis that it is
> > not in
> > agreement with several specific points of the NR
> > Constitution and the
> > by-laws of Nova Roma.
> >
> > Several comments that I have made are my personal opinion
> > and should
> > not be considered to be legal objections. The Leges
> > Saliciae
> > Iudiciaria et Poenalis are legally in force and I must
> > defend them by
> > my oath of office; however much I believe that they should
> > be
> > eliminated or moderated by new actions in the Senate and
> > the
> > Assemblies.
> >
> > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, MCC
> > <complutensis@> wrote:
> > >
> > > *Praefatio*
> >
> > Praetores
> >
> > Two praetors are elected by the Comitia Centuriata to serve
> > a term
> > lasting one year. They shall have the following honors,
> > powers, and
> > obligations:
> >
> > a. To hold Imperium and have the honor of being preceded by
> > six
> > lictors;
> >
> > b. To issue those edicta (edicts) necessary to engage in
> > those tasks
> > which advance the mission and function of Nova Roma and to
> > administer
> > the law (such edicts being binding upon themselves as well
> > as others);
> >
> > FlGA: I believe that "...the law.." should be
> > changed to "NR law"
> > and/or that an addendum be included that states, beyond any
> > doubt,
> > that NR law cannot infringe upon the macronational laws
> > & protections
> > of a member. I bring this up since the SC that made
> > privately owned
> > lists the legal property of NR was blantantly illegal and
> > violated
> > the spirit and letter of the Yahoo Groups rules as well as
> > the U.S.
> > laws/international laws regarding ownership of a website
> > unless that
> > website or list was established ex officio.
> >
> > c. To call the Senate, the comitia centuriata, and the
> > comitia populi
> > tributa to order when the Consuls are unavailable;
> >
> > d. To pronounce intercessio against another praetor or
> > magistrate of
> > lesser authority;
> >
> > FlGA: Providing that the Praetores also quote the
> > appropriate legal
> > basis for their intercessio.
> >
> > e. To appoint scribae (clerks) to assist with
> > administrative and
> > other tasks, as they shall see fit.
> >
> > (Extract from Constitution of Nova Roma IV.A.3)
> >
> >
> > *Imperium*
> >
> > The Comitia Curiatia invest elected Praetores with Imperium
> > , which
> > is necessary to employ Coercitio, interpret and execute law
> >
> > FlGA: Again it needs to be insured that "law"
> > means that
> > macronational law cannot be violated by an NR law.
> >
> > (Extract from Constitution of Nova Roma III.A)
> >
> > In Nova Roma, we understand Imperium as:
> >
> > A. Having all the rights of potestas
> >
> > B. Ius agendi cum populo, calling the People to vote in any
> > of their
> > legislative Comitia.
> >
> > C. Ius agendi cum senatu, calling to Senate to vote or
> > placing a
> > proposed senatus consultum on the Senate agenda.
> >
> > D. Ius coercendi maior, the power to compel obedience using
> > major
> > force, on all Nova Roma subjects. In Nova Roma, this
> > explicitly
> > excludes physical force, and includes the force of law.
> >
> > FlGA: Considering the debacle that occurred in the case of
> > LECA, I
> > believe that this subject should be discussed by all
> > appropriate
> > parties. I believe that the Praetores should have the
> > legal power to
> > moderate an offending citizen but I fail to understand
> > where their
> > power to impose monetary penalties upon a citizen is
> > derived or how
> > such penalties are to be calculated.
> >
> > E. Full iurisdictio, the power to interpret the law, on all
> > levels on
> > all Nova Roma subjects.
> >
> > (Extract from Lex Arminia de Imperio)
> >
> >
> > *Coercitio*
> >
> > The power of coercitio is the power of the Praetores to
> > impose
> > sanctions on those who (by their conduct) hinder and/or
> > jeopardize
> > the purposes of administration of justice.
> >
> > FlGA: Again I must say that I have always interpreted
> > praetorial
> > sanctions to be limited to moderation of the lists. I do
> > not believe
> > that other penalties are clearly provided for in the
> > collective
> > Constitution & by-laws of our corporation.
> >
> > > *
> > > I. Intent of this Edictum*
> >
> > 1. The intent of this edict, based on the Republican Roman
> > Law, is
> > to complement our Leges Saliciae Iudiciaria et Poenalis for
> > cases not
> > covered explicitly in them, and is based in the Imperium of
> > the
> > Praetores, thus intending to fulfill article IV.A.3.b. of
> > the
> > Constitution of Nova Roma.
> >
> > 2. Procedures and cases not covered explicitly in this
> > Edictum or in
> > the Leges of Nova Roma shall be solved at the discretion of
> > the
> > Praetor.
> >
> > FlGA: I definitely oppose this statement since I do not
> > believe
> > that "discretion" should be a basis for by-laws,
> > since such legal by-
> > laws would prevent the need for discretion except as
> > spelled out in a
> > by-law.
> >
> > *II. Entitlement to action, formal requirements, scope of a
> > civil
> > suit*
> >
> > A. Opposing parties
> >
> > 1. Each citizen of Nova Roma has the right, without
> > discrimination
> > as regards status, reputation or duration of citizenship,
> > to seek a
> > remedy at the Praetor´s court as plaintiff in civil
> > suits. According
> > the Lex Salicia Iudiciaria the plaintiff shall be addressed
> > in this
> > edictum as "actor". The defendant shall be
> > addressed as "reus".
> >
> > 2. Actor and Reus may be represented by another citizen
> > (advocate).
> > To appoint an advocate a party has to submit a written
> > notice to the
> > Praetor. This notice may be part of the statement of claim.
> > The
> > notice has to relate to all hearings and procedures.
> >
> > B. Editio Actionis
> >
> > The actor must announce the action he is intending to exert
> > to one of
> > the praetores ("editio actionis"), and then the
> > actor must ask the
> > praetor to start the procedure ("petitio
> > actionis"). The written
> > statement of claim has to be transmitted to the Praetor
> > directly, via
> > e-mail or other suitable ways, with the following formal
> > requirements:
> >
> > 1. Actor, Reus, advocates and witnesses have to be
> > identified with
> > full legal Roman name.
> >
> > 2. The statement of claim must consist of the facts of the
> > case, the
> > offering of available proof, the applicable law, supporting
> > arguments
> > for the application of law on the facts of the case.
> >
> > *III. Admissibility of claim*
> >
> > A. The Praetor acknowledges the receipt of the claim to the
> > Actor.
> >
> > B. The praetor shall decide, within 72 hours, if the
> > petitio actionis
> > shall be presented to a court or if it shall be dismissed.
> > A praetor
> > can dismiss a petitio actionis if and only if one of the
> > following
> > situations applies:
> >
> > B.a. The praetor has no competence in the issue.
> >
> > Example: a praetor can not mediate between two foreign
> > parties, for
> > his competence is limited to the citizens of Nova Roma.
> >
> > B.b. The parties are not sui iuris in Nova Roma.
> >
> > Example: a minor can not play the part of an actor.
> >
> > B.c. The claim is incongruent.
> >
> > Example: "Ticius must be expelled from Nova Roma
> > because he is
> > bearded" is an incongruent claim, for it is not
> > supported by law,
> > precedent or common sense.
> >
> > C. If the claim is dismissed by the praetores, the actor
> > shall be
> > able to present his case again to the praetores in the
> > future,
> > waiting for two new praetores to be elected by the Comitia
> > if
> > necessary.
> >
> > D. If the claim is approved by the praetores, it shall be
> > presented
> > to a court of justice defined according to this law. The
> > reus shall
> > be informed of the nature of the claim presented against
> > him and of
> > the identity of the actor within thirty-six (36) hours
> > after the
> > claim's approval. The Reus is then obliged to
> > "make an appearance".
> > To comply with this obligation the Reus has to transmit an
> > answering
> > statement with the same formal requirements as for the
> > Actor's
> > statement to the Praetor within one week after its receipt.
> > If the
> > Reus so applies, the Praetor may prolong the time limit for
> > the
> > transmission of the statement. By failing to transmit a
> > statement
> > within the prescribed time limit the Reus automatically
> > loses the
> > case. The Praetor will then render a judgement confirming
> > the claim
> > of the Actor without first appointing a Iudex or iudices.
> >
> > E. The Reus may acknowledge the claim. In this case the
> > Praetor
> > confirms it by a publicly certified settlement. The
> > settlement has to
> > be announced to the parties and both parties then have to
> > swear a
> > written oath on the settlement. The publically certified
> > settlement
> > and the written oath will be entered into a public record.
> >
> > F. If the Actor withdraws his claim before judgement, he or
> > she loses
> > the right to address the Praetor's Court with the same
> > case in
> > perpetuity. If the Actor presents new evidence, which is
> > material to
> > the claim itself, the Praetor decides, by his discretion,
> > if the
> > presented evidence are sufficient enough to approve the
> > claim again.
> >
> > *IV. Formula*
> >
> > According the Lex Salicia Iudiciaria:
> >
> > 1. Once a claim has been accepted by a praetor, that same
> > praetor
> > shall prepare a formula to present to the iudices. The
> > formula shall
> > consist of a logical statement that instructs the iudices
> > on the
> > decision they must take. The formula shall be structured
> > into four
> > parts: institutio iudicis, intentio, demonstratio and
> > condemnatio. An
> > explanation of each part follows:
> >
> > A. INSTITVTIO IVDICIS: This clause appoints a certain
> > iudex to
> > judge the case (see below).
> >
> > B. INTENTIO: This part expresses the claim of the actor;
> > i.e., it
> > shall express what the actor seeks by petitioning the
> > praetor. There
> > are two kinds of intentio: intentio certa, when the facts
> > that lead
> > to the actor's claim are so obvious that they do not
> > need to be
> > proved, and intentio incerta, when the actor must prove the
> > facts
> > that justify his claim. Example: Intentio Certa:
> > "According to the
> > contract signed by Titius..." Intentio Incerta:
> > "If it is proved that
> > Ticius owes Gaius 1,000 sestertii, Gaius shall pay Ticius
> > that same
> > amount".
> >
> > C. DEMONSTRATIO: This is the clause that further defines
> > an
> > intentio incerta.
> >
> > D. CONDEMNATIO: This is the clause that allows the
> > iudices to
> > condemn or absolve.
> >
> > Example: a formula could be something like this: "Let
> > Sulpicius be
> > the iudex. If it is proved that Ticius owes Gaius 1,000
> > sestertii,
> > you, iudex, shall condemn Ticius to pay 1,000 sestertii to
> > Gaius;
> > else, you shall acquit Ticius."
> >
> > The clauses would be: Institutio Iudicis: "Let
> > Sulpicius be the
> > iudex."
> > Demonstratio: "If it is proved that ..."
> > Intentio: "... Ticius owes
> > Gaius 1,000 sestertii ..." Condemnatio: "... you,
> > iudex, shall
> > condemn Ticius to pay 1,000 sestertii to Gaius; otherwise,
> > you shall
> > acquit Ticius."
> >
> > 2. To write down a formula, a praetor shall use one of
> > these
> > sources as a basis:
> >
> > A. Lex: the intentio and the condemnatio shall never be in
> > disagreement with the current laws of Nova Roma. They must
> > follow
> > these laws when the situation is explicitly treated by
> > them.
> >
> > B. Iurisprudentia: in those cases where the laws do not
> > present an
> > explicit treatment of a certain situation, a praetor shall
> > create
> > iurisprudentia (jurisprudence) applicable to all similar
> > situations.
> > Iurisprudentia is an expression of the Imperium of the
> > praetor, and
> > it has the same legislative power as a praetorial edictum.
> > Because of
> > this, laws approved by the Comitia shall always supersede
> > iurisprudentia, and a certain praetor can alter previous
> > iurisprudentia through an official edictum whenever common
> > sense
> > dictates that such a course of action is necessary.
> >
> > FlGA: Is there anyone in NR besides myself who believes
> > that the
> > Leges Saliciae Iudiciaria et Poenalis is just too much for
> > a
> > primarily internet organization? I believe the time has
> > come for NR
> > to rid itself of these cumbersome leges and replace them
> > with
> > something that limits such "legal" cases to
> > moderation of those who
> > by insulting language or inappropriate posts AND actions
> > involving
> > the Macellum. Personally, I believe that since the
> > penalties of a
> > legal judicial system in NR cannot be legally enforced.
> > The only
> > genuine penalties that can be enforced is moderation on all
> > NR lists,
> > permanent banning from one or more lists, and expulsion
> > from Nova
> > Roma "for the good of the organization."
> >
> > *V. The Iudices*
> >
> > According the Lex Salicia Iudiciaria:
> >
> > 1. Once the formula is ready, iudices (judges) shall be
> > appointed
> > from the album iudicum, a list of all the citizens that can
> > legally
> > judge a case. The album iudicum shall include the names of
> > all the
> > assidui citizens that have been citizens of Nova Roma for
> > over a year.
> >
> > 2. The number of iudices that shall make up the tribunalis
> > (court of
> > justice) for a certain case shall be decided by the praetor
> > according
> > to the following guidelines:
> >
> > A. The tribunalis shall be composed of ten (10) iudices
> > whenever the
> > intentio includes accusations of laesa patria (seriously
> > threatening
> > the well-being of the Republic), bribery, embezzlement of
> > public
> > funds, prevarication, electoral fraud, attacks to dignitas,
> > slander
> > or libel, or all the crimes defined by the Lex Salicia
> > Poenalis or
> > whenever the sententia might imply the loss of citizenship
> > for one of
> > the parties.
> >
> > FlGA: Apart from embezzlement of public funds which should
> > be
> > pursued by the appropriate legal system in the country in
> > which the
> > offender resides, I cannot see any reason to suspect that
> > NR has much
> > to worry about with bribery and prevarication seems a bit
> > vague
> > without specific examples. While it is possible to slander
> > a fellow
> > citizen or make libelous remarks, it should be the job of
> > the
> > Praetores to impose a penalty of moderation on the
> > offending party.
> > That is one instance where "common sense" and
> > "discretion" might be
> > appropriate.
> >
> > B. In all other occasions, the tribunalis shall be composed
> > of a
> > single iudex.
> >
> > 3. The praetor shall aleatorily take a number of names
> > equal to the
> > number of iudices from the album iudicum. The following
> > considera-
> > tions apply:
> >
> > A. If the praetor considers that some of the iudices thus
> > appointed
> > are obviously related by ties of interest to one of the
> > parties, then
> > the praetor shall, at his own discretion, dismiss those
> > iudices and
> > cast lots to appoint different iudices from the album
> > iudicum.
> >
> > B. A citizen thus appointed to a court shall be able to ask
> > for an
> > exemption from that judicial work if there are factors that
> > do not
> > allow him to serve in that position. The praetor must be
> > asked for
> > that exemption within thirty-six (36) hours of the official
> >
> > announcement of that appointment; the praetor shall grant
> > that
> > exemption at his own discretion, or he shall deny it, thus
> > forcing
> > the appointed iudex to serve or face an accusation of
> > contempt.
> >
> > C. Each party shall be able to dismiss a maximum of three
> > (3)
> > iudices, forcing a new iudex to be aleatorily taken from
> > the album
> > iudicum with each veto. Once both parties agree with a
> > certain group
> > of iudices, or both have already used their three vetoes,
> > the
> > remaining iudices shall be the final iudices, unless one of
> > the
> > preceding paragraphs applies.
> >
> > D. If both parties can agree on a certain citizen(s) of
> > Nova Roma to
> > judge their case before a definitive group of legal iudices
> > has been
> > appointed, then the praetor shall include that citizen (or
> > those
> > citizens) among the iudices for the current case.
> >
> > *VI. Iudicium*
> >
> > 1. SI IN IUS VOCAT, ITO.
> >
> > Both parties must be present at the trial on the date set
> > by the
> > Praetor. Any of the parties can choose to appoint an
> > advocatus
> > (advocate or barrister) to speak for them in front of the
> > iudices, or
> > they can choose to speak by themselves. An advocatus shall
> > not
> > receive a fee for his services.
> >
> >
> > 2. COM PERORANTO AMBO PRAESENTES:
> >
> > Both Actor and Reus must be present in the court to speak;
> > they shall
> > plead together in person.
> >
> > 3. POST MERIDIEM PRAESENTI LITEM ADDICITO
> >
> > 3.a If one of the parties does not appear on the date set
> > by the
> > Praetor the Praetor shall adjudge the case, in favour of
> > the one
> > present.
> >
> > 3.b If the Actor is not present at the trial on the date
> > set by the
> > Praetor means that he or she renounces litigate and he or
> > she loses
> > the right to address the Praetor's Court with the same
> > case in
> > perpetuity and face an accusation of contempt.
> >
> > FlGA: I regret to say that I find all this pseudo-legal
> > balderdash
> > to be subject to my personal contempt. Fellow citizens,
> > there has to
> > be a better way to resolve our disagreements other than
> > edicta such
> > as this example.
> >
> > 3.c If the Reus is not present at the trial he or she
> > automatically
> > loses the case because if the Reus does not offer a
> > defense, then it
> > is non contendere and left to the Praetor to decide his
> > sentence
> > because he has acquiesced to a verdict of guilt, and face
> > an
> > accusation of contempt.
> >
> > 3.d If both parties do not appear on the date set by the
> > Praetor the
> > Praetor they face an accusation of contempt.
> >
> > 3.e If one or both parties, for a justified and certified
> > reason,
> > cannot appear on the date set by the Praetor, shall notify
> > it in
> > advance at least 24 hours.
> >
> > Having studied the causes, the Praetor may postpone the
> > date of the
> > trial up to a month, setting a new date for holding in
> > agreement with
> > the parties.
> >
> > 3.f The Praetor may, at his discretion, defer the trial if
> > a
> > guarantor or vindex guarantees that the cause of
> > non-appearance, by
> > the actor or Reus, is justified by unforeseen
> > circumstances.
> >
> > This vindex or guarantor will be fined if his sponsored
> > party is not
> > present at trial on the new date set by Praetor.
> >
> > 4. PROCEDURES
> >
> > A. A Once a tribunal has been appointed, the praetor
> > shall inform
> > the iudices of the formula that they shall apply. The
> > praetor shall
> > decide if the trial is going to be conducted under the
> > public
> > scrutiny or, should the dignitas of innocents be at stake,
> > declare a
> > secret summary and move the trial away from public
> > scrutiny.
> >
> > B. The actor shall present evidence to back his demands,
> > and then
> > the reus shall present evidence to back his defense.
> > Evidence shall
> > consist of anything that is relevant to the case, including
> > written
> > texts, visual evidence, and the statements of witnesses or
> > experts.
> > In the case of statements, each party shall have the right
> > to ask
> > questions of the witnesses and experts presented by the
> > other party.
> >
> > C. If the Reus does not offer a defense, then it is non
> > contendere
> > and left to the Praetor to decide his sentence because he
> > has
> > acquiesced to a verdict of guilt.
> >
> > D. The praetor shall be the final judge to determine what
> > pieces of
> > evidence are relevant to the case.
> >
> > E. Once both parties have presented their evidence, each
> > party
> > shall have the opportunity to make one final statement in
> > front of
> > the iudices, with the actor speaking in the first place.
> > Then the
> > praetor shall call for a sententia (sentence) from the
> > iudices,
> > according to Pars V of this Edict, reminding the iudices
> > that, in
> > case of doubt, they must *not* condemn the reus.
> >
> > *VII. Sententia*
> >
> > 1. Once the praetor has called for a sententia, the
> > iudices shall
> > have seventy-two (72) hours to deliberate; within those
> > seventy-two
> > (72) hours, the iudices shall individually issue one of the
> > following
> > sentences:
> >
> > a. ABSOLVO: if the tribunal's majority decision is
> > "absolvo", the
> > reus shall be acquitted.
> >
> > b. CONDEMNO: if the tribunal's majority decision is
> > "condemno",
> > the reus shall be condemned according to the formula
> > previously
> > established by the praetor.
> >
> > c. Should there be a draw in the tribunal's votes,
> > the reus
> > shall be acquitted.
> >
> > 2. Once all the iudices have issued their sententiae,
> > the praetor
> > shall immediately inform the parties of the sententia, and
> > shall
> > enforce any penalties through his imperium.
> >
> > > *
> > > VIII. De Criminibus Poenisque*
> >
> > 1. The crimes and the penalties are listed in the Lex
> > Salicia
> > Poenalis Pars Altera.
> >
> > 2. Iurisprudentia: in those cases where the laws do not
> > present
> > an explicit treatment of a certain situation, a praetor
> > shall create
> > iurisprudentia (jurisprudence) applicable to all similar
> > situations.
> > Iurisprudentia is an expression of the Imperium of the
> > praetor, and
> > it has the same legislative power as a praetorial edictum.
> > Because of
> > this, laws approved by the Comitia shall always supersede
> > iurisprudentia, and a certain praetor can alter previous
> > iurisprudentia through an official edictum whenever common
> > sense
> > dictates that such a course of action is necessary.
> >
> > 3. Breach of warranty provided by the Vindex: the
> > Vindex may be
> > fined with no small amount equal to the taxes of one year
> > and not
> > over US $ 30.00. The Vindex shall be counted among the
> > capite censi
> > until the fine has been paid.
> >
> > 4. Contempt: The citizen accused of contempt may be
> > fined with
> > no small amount equal to the taxes of two years and not
> > over US $
> > 100.00 and shall be counted among the capite censi until
> > the fine has
> > been paid.
> >
> > FlGA: I find again that such penalties as outline in this
> > edictum to
> > be unenforcible and I believe that based upon the
> > possibility of
> > violation of current national laws in the multiple
> > jurisdictions that
> > compose Nova Roma, Inc., that the Tribunes should consider
> > intercessio against this edictum. Furthermore, I have yet
> > to be
> > given a specific example of where the Constitution or our
> > by-laws
> > gives the praetores the legal basis for assessing a
> > financial penalty
> > upon any member of Nova Roma. This lack of evidence would
> > also be
> > the basis for intercessio.
> >
> >
> > *IX. Appeal and Reduction of fines*
> >
> > 1. The sentenced citizen can appeal the fines for
> > contempt before
> > the Praetores.
> >
> > 2. The fines for contempt may be reduced by up to 90%,
> > at
> > discretion of the Praetores, in the case that the fined
> > citizen
> > carry out the mandate or of the Praetores or of the Court
> >
> > *X. Provocatione ad Populum*
> >
> > 1. In those cases where a sententia implies a loss of
> > citizenship, the reus shall have the right to publicly
> > claim a
> > confirmation vote from the Comitia Centuriata within
> > fifteen (15)
> > days after the issue of the sentence. Once the reus claims
> > this
> > right, the consules shall call the Comitia Centuriata
> > within fifteen
> > (15) days to vote upon the reus's expulsion. Should the
> > Comitia
> > Centuriata confirm the sententia, the sententia shall be
> > applied.
> > Should the Comitia Centuriata vote against the sententia,
> > the
> > sententia shall be nullified.
> >
> >
> > 2. In those cases where a sententia does not imply a
> > loss of
> > citizenship, the reus shall have the right to publicly
> > claim a
> > confirmation vote from the Comitia Populi Tributa within
> > fifteen (15)
> > days after the issue of the sentence. Once the reus claims
> > this
> > right, the consules shall call the Comitia Populi Tributa .
> > Should
> > the Comitia Populi Tributa confirm the sententia, the
> > sententia shall
> > be applied.
> > Should the Comitia Populi Tributa vote against the
> > sententia, the
> > sententia shall be nullified.
> >
> > *XI. Execution of Judgements*
> >
> > To execute an incontestable judgement or a publicly
> > certified
> > settlement, the Praetor may, on application of a party,
> > call on all
> > legal expedients available to him. He may also call on the
> > help of
> > all Magistrates of Nova Roma, who shall render such
> > assistance as
> > they are reasonably able to do so. The violation of an oath
> > falls
> > under the jusrisdiction of the collegia of the priesthood.
> >
> > FlGA: The praetores have no legal right to call upon the
> > Tribunes
> > since imperium is not superior to our sancrosanctus nor is
> > an
> > praetorial edictum superior to the power of the Tribunes of
> > the
> > People.
> >
> >
> > *XII. Effective Date of this Edictum*
> >
> > This Edictum becomes effective immediately and will be in
> > effect
> > until formal legislation is enacted by the Comitia.
> >
> > Hoc edictum ilico valet.
> >
> > Datum sub manibus nostris a.d. XV Kal. Ian. MMDCCLXI A.V.C.
> > M.Moravio T.Iulio cos.
> >
> > M.Curiatius Complutensis
> > M. Iulius Severus
> > Praetores Novae Romae
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60023 From: Gnaeus Iulius Caesar Date: 2008-12-19
Subject: Re: Edictum Praetorium Curiatio-Iulio de Iurisdictione Praetoris -
Cn. Iulius Caesar Praetori M. Iulio Severo

Allow me to oblige you. Let us start with Section VIII. De Criminibus
Poenisque of your edict.

This year you and your colleague used the principle of iurisprudentia
to create a hitherto unknown, and thus I contend illegal (and
therefore unconstitutional) offence of contempt for failing to
appear. The Lex Salicia iudiciaria only references contempt in
respect of an iudex who fails to appear. Your relied on Section V1.B
of the Lex Salicia iudiciaria, the creation of iurisprudentia, to
justify extending this to the Reus, amongst other spurious reasons
such as the good of the state etc.

However, Section VI.B relates to the PARS SECVNDA: DE FORMVLA stage.
The PARS PRIMA: DE PETITIONE ACTIONIS stage of the Lex Salicia
iudiciaria is where a prateor is required to establish if there is a
valid claim. As a requisite part of this stage the laws must be
examined to first of all identify that there is an ACTUAL EXISTING
offence which can be applied to the circumstances that are claimed to
have occurred. Only once a claim has been judged to be valid under
the laws as THEY EXIST, can the matter proceed to the PARS SECVNDA:
DE FORMVLA stage. So what does Nova Roman law, note I say that not
Roman law for we are ruled by the constitution and our own laws here -
not what once was or what someone makes up as they go along - say
iurisprudentia can be used for?

Iurisprudentia is referenced in the PARS SECVNDA: DE FORMVLA where
the praetor has to "prepare a formula to present to the iudices"
based on the now established claim, which in turn is based on the
laws THAT EXIST. In other words, it is a procedural device to allow
an existing law to be adapted to meet circumstances not specifically
addressed in the existing law that created the offence. What you and
your colleague did was hijack this power and use it to create an
offence totally unrelated to the claim of the Actor addressed in the
PARS PRIMA: DE PETITIONE ACTIONIS stage.

You used the power of iurisprudentia, intended to be used in respect
of the claim of the Actor, in other words the complainant,
the "victim", to instead enhance the power and reach of the court.
This was a flagrant breach of the law. You abrogated to yourself the
power of the people, not to make sense of, in this case, the existing
offence of INIVRIA, created under Section 22 of the Lex Salicia
poenalis and allow for a formula to be constructed in circumstances
that were not specifically covered, but instead to actually extend
the scope and power of the Lex Salicia iudiciaria, the very lex that
created the right of iurisprudentia. You took a provision designed to
ensure that the claims of an Actor could be put before a court under
circumstances that the Lex Salicia poenalis had not anticipated and
instead created a power for yourself to condemn a man for failing to
attend.

Iurisprudentia in Nova Roma, so stop relying on Rome of antiquity for
our laws come from the Constitution and the Nova Roman people, was
clearly by its placement in the PARS SECVNDA: DE FORMVLA satge not
designed to be used either in the validation of the claim stage, nor
most certainly to extend the power of a magistrate to be able to
claim an offence had been committed when it was never before your
pronouncement an offence. If the Lex Salicia iudiciaria was worded
ineptly, as it was, then your duty was to stop the trial, for you had
no grounds to compel attendance, nor to convict for contempt for the
same. The Nova Roman people never granted that right in comitia
deciding on law to a magistrate. You and your colleague acted ultra
vires, and you did so because you were determined that the trial
would proceed at all costs - even if you were reduced as you were to
abusing the Constitution and the law in order to do so. I won't even
bother to add that what you did flew in the face of basic fairness
and was an unpleasant reminder that even in our little community such
arrant nonsense as the "needs of the state", the 'good of the
majority" can be peddled to deny an accused the right to be treated
fairly. This was a political trial, of no ultimate value to Nova
Roma, with no hope of compelling the Reus to alter his behavior
conducted under false law.

As to the Constitution, Section 1.A.3 prohibits anyone from being
punished for an action that at the time it was committed was not an
offence. From the moment that Lucius Equitius Cincinnatus failed to
present himself for your show trial your ability to subsequently
punish him for that ceased. You created this bogus offence of
contempt AFTER he had failed to appear, in a manner that was itself
as I have addressed above illegal. Thus not only was the creation of
the offence of contempt illegal, your act of punishing him for that
was unconstitutional and a breach of your oath of office to protect
the Constitution. There other points which I could cover but will
save for a later event, where you too can have your say.

So in respect of your past actions you and your colleague have shown
yourselves to be utterly incapable in following the laws of this
community as they exist, and utterly trustworthy in effectively
trying to run a man out of Nova Roma on spurious legal precedents.
This edict of yours attempts to provide feeble justification for
actions earlier this year, which were unconstitutional, illegal and
of course thus utterly unfair. This edict is an abuser's charter,
designed to provide tenuous legal grounds to justify usurping the
power of the people to make law. Your role and that of your colleague
was to administer the law - as it EXISTED - and not to abrogate
legislative powers to yourselves to fill in the blanks, enabling this
rushed show trial to be hustled through.

Simply put it should be struck down as it is an affront to the rights
of the people to decide their own fate and the fate of their co-
citizens, and a recipe for future like minded magistrates to
wrongfully and shamefully convict.


Cn. Iulius Caesar

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, M•IVL•SEVERVS
<marcusiuliusseverus@...> wrote:
>
> M. Iulius Severus Ap. Galerio Aureliano omnibusque sal.
>  
> You could start by offering real legal proof and evidence that our
Edictum "is in contradiction of the NR Constitution", as you put it.
> But we are ready to follow all the legal proceedings needed to
stand by our Edictum.
>  
> Vale, et valete,
>
> M•IVL•SEVERVS
> PRÆTOR•NOVÆ•ROMÆ
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60024 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2008-12-19
Subject: Fwd: [moderatorcentral] Severed Cables Causing Email Delays
Forwarded FYI. Especially pertinent to citizens in southern Europe.

Valete,

-- Marinus

----- Forwarded message from gordonst@... -----
Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 15:54:47 -0800
From: Gordon Strause <gordonst@...>
Reply-To: moderatorcentral-owner@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [moderatorcentral] Severed Cables Causing Email Delays
To: moderatorcentral@yahoogroups.com

http://tinyurl.com/severedcable
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601085&sid=ayPbWf_7l17w&refer=europe

The severed cables described in the article above are affecting
Yahoo!'s data connections. One consequence is that group members may
find the delivery of some messages to their inbox delayed until this
problem is resolved (which could be days or weeks).

This problem is likely to primarily affect Yahoo! Groups users in
India but will not be limited to them. So if you suspect you're not
receiving all messages that have been posted to a group, we highly
encourage you to visit the group's message archive.

Thank you,

- Gordon
Yahoo! Groups Team

P.S. Unrelated to this issue, beginning at 3 pm (PST) yesterday there
was a problem with some of the "Contact Us" links in Groups
Help.

Clicking those links is supposed to bring a user to this page:
http://tinyurl.com/groupshelp
http://help.yahoo.com/l/us/yahoo/groups/original/members/forms/forms_index.html

But some of the "Contact Us" links were not working correctly
yesterday afternoon through earlier today. However, that issue has now
been fully resolved.

P.P.S. As always, if you have follow up question, please contact
Customer Care at the address above. Replies to this message will NOT
get a response. Thank you.

------------------------------------

Visit the Groups Blog at: http://www.ygroupsblog.com/blog/Yahoo! Groups Links





----- End forwarded message -----


CN-EQVIT-MARINVS
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60025 From: M. Lucretius Agricola Date: 2008-12-20
Subject: Re: Tribunes
The following (partly covered to prevent scooping) are now set as
forwarding addresses for the tribunes@ address:

warriXXXXXXX@XXXXXXXXXXX

galerXXXXXXXXXXX@XXXXXXXXX

canadXXXXXXXXXXXXX@XXXXXXXXX

brothXXXXXXXXX@XXXXXXXXX

MLA


--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "M. Lucretius Agricola"
<marcus.lucretius@...> wrote:
>
> Would the new tribunes contact the IT staff at
> http://www.novaroma.org/bin/contact?target=webmaster with the e-mail
> addresses they would like to use to receive mail from the tribunes@
> address?
>
> Thanks
>
> MLA
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60026 From: Marcvs Octavivs Corvvs Date: 2008-12-20
Subject: Revival of gladiatorial tuornaments in Rome
La Reppublica has posted the article abour the attempt to revive
gladiatorial combats in Colosseum:
http://ricerca.repubblica.it/repubblica/archivio/repubblica/2008/12/19/t
ornino-al-colosseo-combattimenti-tra-gladiatori.html
this is an initiative of Member of City council Umberto Broccoli.
Perhaps this information signifies the positive shift in opinions which
can use for PRO DIIS project?

Merry Saturnalia to all Novaromans! :)

CORVVS
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60027 From: Robert Levee Date: 2008-12-20
Subject: Re: Edictum Praetorium Curiatio-Iulio de Iurisdictione Praetoris -
Ap.Galerio Aureliano Honorable PraetoriM.Iulio Severo S.P.D.

I must tell you, that I could not have rendered my case more eloquently, than has been done by the Honorable Cn.Iulius Caesar.I would however, also contest the amounts that you would impose, upon those who would be offenders under this leges.By that I mean, that the monetary penalty imposed, does not take into consideration the economic levels of civies, not as fortunate to be living, in the more affluent areas of the Republic.
Just to take for example, let us consider, the fact that the average Mexican factory worker makes five dollars a day, and in Guatemala two dollars.This in my opinion, may be a violation of macronational law.Without a fair scale, upon which to base these penalties and without taking these facts into consideration, once again in my opinion, is unjust.

You have said,"But we are ready to follow all the legal proceedings needed to stand by our Edictum".

I will with all due respect, do the same Sir, to defend the interests of the Order of the Plebs.

Vale,
Ap.Galerio Aureliano


--- On Fri, 12/19/08, Gnaeus Iulius Caesar <gn_iulius_caesar@...> wrote:

> From: Gnaeus Iulius Caesar <gn_iulius_caesar@...>
> Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Edictum Praetorium Curiatio-Iulio de Iurisdictione Praetoris - Responsum Fl.GA
> To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> Date: Friday, December 19, 2008, 8:15 PM
> Cn. Iulius Caesar Praetori M. Iulio Severo
>
> Allow me to oblige you. Let us start with Section VIII. De
> Criminibus
> Poenisque of your edict.
>
> This year you and your colleague used the principle of
> iurisprudentia
> to create a hitherto unknown, and thus I contend illegal
> (and
> therefore unconstitutional) offence of contempt for failing
> to
> appear. The Lex Salicia iudiciaria only references contempt
> in
> respect of an iudex who fails to appear. Your relied on
> Section V1.B
> of the Lex Salicia iudiciaria, the creation of
> iurisprudentia, to
> justify extending this to the Reus, amongst other spurious
> reasons
> such as the good of the state etc.
>
> However, Section VI.B relates to the PARS SECVNDA: DE
> FORMVLA stage.
> The PARS PRIMA: DE PETITIONE ACTIONIS stage of the Lex
> Salicia
> iudiciaria is where a prateor is required to establish if
> there is a
> valid claim. As a requisite part of this stage the laws
> must be
> examined to first of all identify that there is an ACTUAL
> EXISTING
> offence which can be applied to the circumstances that are
> claimed to
> have occurred. Only once a claim has been judged to be
> valid under
> the laws as THEY EXIST, can the matter proceed to the PARS
> SECVNDA:
> DE FORMVLA stage. So what does Nova Roman law, note I say
> that not
> Roman law for we are ruled by the constitution and our own
> laws here -
> not what once was or what someone makes up as they go
> along - say
> iurisprudentia can be used for?
>
> Iurisprudentia is referenced in the PARS SECVNDA: DE
> FORMVLA where
> the praetor has to "prepare a formula to present to
> the iudices"
> based on the now established claim, which in turn is based
> on the
> laws THAT EXIST. In other words, it is a procedural device
> to allow
> an existing law to be adapted to meet circumstances not
> specifically
> addressed in the existing law that created the offence.
> What you and
> your colleague did was hijack this power and use it to
> create an
> offence totally unrelated to the claim of the Actor
> addressed in the
> PARS PRIMA: DE PETITIONE ACTIONIS stage.
>
> You used the power of iurisprudentia, intended to be used
> in respect
> of the claim of the Actor, in other words the complainant,
> the "victim", to instead enhance the power and
> reach of the court.
> This was a flagrant breach of the law. You abrogated to
> yourself the
> power of the people, not to make sense of, in this case,
> the existing
> offence of INIVRIA, created under Section 22 of the Lex
> Salicia
> poenalis and allow for a formula to be constructed in
> circumstances
> that were not specifically covered, but instead to actually
> extend
> the scope and power of the Lex Salicia iudiciaria, the very
> lex that
> created the right of iurisprudentia. You took a provision
> designed to
> ensure that the claims of an Actor could be put before a
> court under
> circumstances that the Lex Salicia poenalis had not
> anticipated and
> instead created a power for yourself to condemn a man for
> failing to
> attend.
>
> Iurisprudentia in Nova Roma, so stop relying on Rome of
> antiquity for
> our laws come from the Constitution and the Nova Roman
> people, was
> clearly by its placement in the PARS SECVNDA: DE FORMVLA
> satge not
> designed to be used either in the validation of the claim
> stage, nor
> most certainly to extend the power of a magistrate to be
> able to
> claim an offence had been committed when it was never
> before your
> pronouncement an offence. If the Lex Salicia iudiciaria was
> worded
> ineptly, as it was, then your duty was to stop the trial,
> for you had
> no grounds to compel attendance, nor to convict for
> contempt for the
> same. The Nova Roman people never granted that right in
> comitia
> deciding on law to a magistrate. You and your colleague
> acted ultra
> vires, and you did so because you were determined that the
> trial
> would proceed at all costs - even if you were reduced as
> you were to
> abusing the Constitution and the law in order to do so. I
> won't even
> bother to add that what you did flew in the face of basic
> fairness
> and was an unpleasant reminder that even in our little
> community such
> arrant nonsense as the "needs of the state", the
> 'good of the
> majority" can be peddled to deny an accused the right
> to be treated
> fairly. This was a political trial, of no ultimate value to
> Nova
> Roma, with no hope of compelling the Reus to alter his
> behavior
> conducted under false law.
>
> As to the Constitution, Section 1.A.3 prohibits anyone from
> being
> punished for an action that at the time it was committed
> was not an
> offence. From the moment that Lucius Equitius Cincinnatus
> failed to
> present himself for your show trial your ability to
> subsequently
> punish him for that ceased. You created this bogus offence
> of
> contempt AFTER he had failed to appear, in a manner that
> was itself
> as I have addressed above illegal. Thus not only was the
> creation of
> the offence of contempt illegal, your act of punishing him
> for that
> was unconstitutional and a breach of your oath of office to
> protect
> the Constitution. There other points which I could cover
> but will
> save for a later event, where you too can have your say.
>
> So in respect of your past actions you and your colleague
> have shown
> yourselves to be utterly incapable in following the laws of
> this
> community as they exist, and utterly trustworthy in
> effectively
> trying to run a man out of Nova Roma on spurious legal
> precedents.
> This edict of yours attempts to provide feeble
> justification for
> actions earlier this year, which were unconstitutional,
> illegal and
> of course thus utterly unfair. This edict is an
> abuser's charter,
> designed to provide tenuous legal grounds to justify
> usurping the
> power of the people to make law. Your role and that of your
> colleague
> was to administer the law - as it EXISTED - and not to
> abrogate
> legislative powers to yourselves to fill in the blanks,
> enabling this
> rushed show trial to be hustled through.
>
> Simply put it should be struck down as it is an affront to
> the rights
> of the people to decide their own fate and the fate of
> their co-
> citizens, and a recipe for future like minded magistrates
> to
> wrongfully and shamefully convict.
>
>
> Cn. Iulius Caesar
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, M•IVL•SEVERVS
>
> <marcusiuliusseverus@...> wrote:
> >
> > M. Iulius Severus Ap. Galerio Aureliano omnibusque
> sal.
> >  
> > You could start by offering real legal proof and
> evidence that our
> Edictum "is in contradiction of the NR
> Constitution", as you put it.
> > But we are ready to follow all the legal proceedings
> needed to
> stand by our Edictum.
> >  
> > Vale, et valete,
> >
> > M•IVL•SEVERVS
> > PRÆTOR•NOVÆ•ROMÆ
> >
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60028 From: Gnaeus Iulius Caesar Date: 2008-12-20
Subject: Re: Edictum Praetorium Curiatio-Iulio de Iurisdictione Praetoris -
Cn. Iulius Caesar L. Liviae Plautae sal.

Either this edict is the most useless one ever produced, repeating as
it does sections of the constitution and laws, or, it is a pernicious
one. As I don't believe either of this year's praetors are prone to
produce irrelevant edicts, I have to assume there was some point in
repeating the extant elements.

As I said in my earlier post, I believe as others do that the
praetors over extended themselves and abrogated rights and powers
they never had, do not have and more importantly never should have.
If we are to have laws here in Nova Roma amongst many other
considerations, such as enforceability and relevance, also comes the
issue of knowledge of the law.

It is the hallmark of a nascent petty oligarchy that would allow for
a magistrate to invent offences after the fact. Drawing on historical
precedents is no defense to such behavior for to be able to simply
pluck an offence or legal precedent out of the pages of history,
circumvent the comitia who are the bodies who should decide matters
such as criminal offences or civil liabilities at law, and worse
still apply them retroactively is inherently unfair and unjust.
Citizens here should, if we are to have any form of rules, laws -
call them what you will - be able to look to a written record of law
in existence when they perform "x" act or "y" behavior. It is
patently dangerous and absurd to allow magistrates the right to
pencil in offences after the fact. No citizen could ever feel safe.

The praetors did just that this year, relying on amongst other
rationale the necessity of making the trial process work. Now in this
edict what is the purpose? How does it link to the farce of the show
trials earlier this year? Look to the placement of the section on
iurisprudentia. It lies in a section dedicated to crimes and
penalties. Since this year's praetors took the right of
iurisprudentia and created a totally new offence, then this should
not surprise us. So what is the point of doing this? what is the gain?

The gain I strongly believe is to validate their actions in the show
trials, provide some form of retroactive legal justification and more
importantly set the stage for the future. This edict can be used as
justification by future Praetors to create other offences. It will be
cited as precedent, not simply the trial processes but now those
processes enshrined in an edict.

So here is how it will work. A citizen could find himself subject of
a claim that he had committed an iniuria. A praetor examining such a
claim could find that the offence of iniuria as written in law does
not apply to the facts presented. That praetor could decide
maliciously, for any number of reasons - personal friendship with the
Actor, political allegiance etc. - that he was not prepared to
dismiss the claim as it should be, but instead would create a new
law - a form of iniuria with a different wording applicable to the
facts presented to his tribunal.

But what justification could he use? "Ah ha!" he says, scrabbling to
find this wretched edict, "look here - I have found this edict which
in itself established the iurisprudentia of a praetor being able to
create a criminal offence or civil liability! Look to the placement
of the section on iurisprudentia in the edict, for it lies in the
section on crimes and penalties. Further this was based on actual
trials! well there is all the justification I need."

This edict is not simply a restatement of extant law, it is actually
a very clever way to establish a precedent that would allow
magistrates - specifically though not exclusively the praetors - to
by-pass the comitia and invent offences to meet the needs of the
moment. The people would become redundant at such times. Powers
normally only granted to a dictator would be enshrined in legal
precedent here in Nova Roma, the precedent of a praetor abrogating
the power to create fresh, new offences at will.

The very fact that this year's praetors have already demonstrated
they are capable and willing to do this makes it all the more
important that the dangers of this edict, when read in conjunction
with that illegal and unconstitutional behavior, are exposed to the
light of day. This is not just some banal edict with no relevance.
This edict could be used to hijack the legislative function of the
people. It provides a precedent for illegality and abuse of power. It
codifies the mismanagement of our judicial system. It is dangerous
because it can be used to ill-effect, to deny rights and freedoms and
to usurp the power of the citizens.

Yes edicts expire at the end of a year, unless ratified by the
incoming magistrates. Even if the edict does die, the very fact that
it existed can be used to lay claim to it having created
iurisprudentia, which does NOT die. That just sits there as precedent
and can be invoked in the future. To ensure that this does not happen
requires that this edict be killed, now. If that does not happen,
while it would hopefully be challenged we have seen how if the
praetors are determined to run their court in a certain manner and
the consuls will not veto (hardly likely this year was it?) that
behavior, then the protests will simply be ignored. Illegality will
be converted into regular usage.

Look past this just being a pointless edict quoting extant law, for
nothing this year's praetor's do is without purpose, and look to the
illegality of using iurisprudentia in this way. Only the people
should decide on the creation of offences and liabilities.

When would edict be used nefariously? When in the future its suits
the consuls and praetors of that time to convict a person in order to
effectively remove him or her from Nova Roma. Why would they do that?
Because we have seen it done once this year and it worked and it is
often easier to dispose of someone with the cloak of legality thrown
over an illegal act, than it is to debate and endure an opponent.
Because some magistrate wants to get his own way at whatever cost.
The reasons are myriad.

This is far from a simple inoffensive little edict.

Vale bene


--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Lucia Livia Plauta" <cases@...>
wrote:
>
> L. Livia Plauta Fl. Galerio Aureliano et Ap. Galerio Aureliano
S.P.D.
>
> Will please someone explain to me exactly where an edict half of
> which consist in quotations from the Constitution is against the
> Constitution?
> Please provide the offending paragraph of the edict and the
relevant
> paragraph of the Constitution that's being offended.
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60029 From: Gaius Petronius Dexter Date: 2008-12-20
Subject: Today in Rome: Dec 20, 2008.
C. Petronius Dexter omnibus Quiritibus s.p.d.,
 
Today in Rome :
 
(Julian day : 2 454 821).
 
A. d. XIII Kalendas Ianuarias
MMDCCLXII anno Vrbis conditae.
Coss. M. Moravio T. Iulio.
 
Day of the week : Saturni dies (Saturday).
 
Lunaris dies: XXIV.
Nundinal letter : B.
 
Hora ortus Solis : 07:33.
Hora occasus Solis : 16:41.
Temp. Min. : 3° C.
Temp. Max. : 12° C.
Wind on Rome : 15 Km/h.
Humidity: 65%.
Weather: More sun than clouds. Cool.
 
Horae diei :
 
I: 07:33 - 08:17 Martis hora.
II: 08:17 - 09:02 Solis hora.
III: 09:02 - 09:46 Veneris hora.
IV: 09:46 - 10:31 Mercurii hora.
V: 10:31 - 11:15 Lunae hora.
VI: 11:15 - 12:00 Saturni hora.
VII: 12:00 - 12:46 Iovis hora.
VIII: 12:46 - 13:33 Martis hora.
IX: 13:33 - 14:20 Solis hora.
X: 14:20 - 15:07 Veneris hora.
XI: 15:07 - 15:54 Mercurii hora.
XII: 15:54 - 16:41 Lunae hora.
 

Horae noctis :
 
I: 16:41 - 17:54 Saturni hora.
II: 17:54 - 19:07 Iovis hora.
III: 19:07 - 20:20 Martis hora.
IV: 20:20 - 21:33 Solis hora.
V: 21:33 - 22:46 Veneris hora.
VI: 22:46 - 00:00 Mercurii hora.
VII: 00:00 - 01:15 Lunae hora.
VIII: 01:15 - 02:31 Saturni hora.
IX: 02:31 - 03:47 Iovis hora.
X: 03:47 - 05:02 Martis hora.
XI: 05:02 - 06:18 Solis hora.
XII: 06:18 - 07:34 Veneris hora.
 

Valete.
 
C. Petronius Dexter.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60030 From: marcushoratius Date: 2008-12-20
Subject: a. d. XIII Kalendas Ianuarias: Vitellius and Vespasian
M. Moravius Piscinus Horatianus Quiritibus et omnibus salutem
plurimam dicit: Io Saturnalia! Io Triumphe!

Hodie est ante diem XIII Kalendas Ianuarias; haec dies comitialis
est: feriae Opi ad forum

Ay, ere the reign of Dicte's king, ere men,
Waxed godless, banqueted on slaughtered bulls,
Such life on earth did golden Saturn lead.
Nor ear of man had heard the war-trump's blast,
Nor clang of sword on stubborn anvil set.

~ Vergil, Georgic 2.536-540


Bisaltia saves Calpurnius

"Calpurnius Crassus, one of the noblemen who had campaqigned with
Regulus, was dispatched against the Massylians to sack a certain
stronghold by name Garaetium, a place difficult to capture. He was
taken captive and was destined to be sacrificed to Saturnus; but
Bisaltia, daughter of the king, fell in love with him, betrayed her
father, and gave her lover the victory. But when he returned home,
the maiden slew herself. So Hesianax in the third book of his Libyan
History." ~ Pseudo-Plutarch, Parallela Minora 23


AUC 822 / 69 CE: Death of Vitellius

"Vitellius in his fear put on a ragged and filthy tunic and concealed
himself in a dark room where dogs were kept, intending to escape
during the night to Tarracina and there join his brother. But the
soldiers sought and found him; for naturally he could not go entirely
unrecognized very long after having been emperor. They seized him,
covered as he was with rubbish and blood (for he had been bitten by
the dogs), and tearing off his tunic they bound his hands behind his
back and put a rope round his neck. And thus they led down from the
palace the Caesar who had reveled there; along the Sacred Way they
dragged the emperor who had often paraded past in his chair of state,
and they conducted the Augustus to the Forum, where he had often
addressed the people. Some buffeted him, some plucked at his beard;
all mocked him, all insulted him, making comments especially upon his
riotous living, since he had a protuberant belly. When, in shame at
this treatment, he lowered his gaze, the soldiers would prick him
under the chin with their daggers, in order to make him look up even
against his will. A German who witnessed this could not endure it,
but taking pity on him cried: "I will help you in the only way that I
can." Thereupon he wounded Vitellius and slew himself. How,
Vitellius did not die of the wound, but was dragged to the prison, as
were also his statues, while many jests and many opprobrious remarks
were made about them. Finally, grieved to the heart at what he had
suffered and what he had been hearing, he cried: "And yet I was once
our emperor." At that the soldiers became enraged and led him to the
Stairway, where they struck him down. Then they cut off his head and
carried it about all over the city." ~ Dio Cassius 64.20-21


AUC 822 / 69 CE: Vespasianus declared Emperor

"Such was the course of these events; and following them Vespasian
was declared emperor by the senate also, and Titus and Domitian were
given the title of Caesars. The consular office was assumed by
Vespasian and Titus while the former was in Egypt and the latter in
Palestine. Now portents and dreams had come to Vespasian pointing to
the sovereignty long beforehand. Thus, as he was eating dinner on his
country estate, where most of his time was spent, an ox approached
him, knelt down and placed his head beneath his feet. On another
occasion, when he was also eating, a dog dropped a human hand under
the table. And a conspicuous cypress tree, which had been uprooted
and overthrown by a violent wind, stood upright again on the
following day by its own power and continued to flourish. From a
dream he learned that when Nero Caesar should lose a tooth, he
himself should be emperor. This prophecy about the tooth became a
reality on the following day; and Nero himself in his dreams once
thought that he had brought the car of Jupiter to Vespasian's house.
These portents needed interpretation; but not so the saying of a Jew
named Josephus: he, having earlier been captured by Vespasian and
imprisoned, laughed and said: 'You may imprison me now, but a year
from now, when you have become emperor, you will release me.'" ~ Dio
Cassius 65.1

Our thought for today comes from Sextus, Selected Sentences 5:

"You have in yourself some thing similar to God, and therefore use
yourself as the temple of God, on account of that which in you
resembles God."
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60031 From: Gnaeus Iulius Caesar Date: 2008-12-20
Subject: Re: Edictum Praetorium Curiatio-Iulio de Iurisdictione Praetoris -
Cn. Iulius Caesar Ap.Galerio Aureliano Quiritibusque sal.

My thanks for your comments. As you are no doubt aware by now, I have
discovered that at least two of my posts to this list appear to have
been moderated.

Thus I have been placed on moderation, without my knowledge and for
some reason as yet unknown and unstated. This was not due to my
messages being spam, for such would have shown up on the message
headers when viewing the source header code.

I have yet to receive an explanation for this, so if I don't reply in
my normal prompt fashion, it may well be due to what appears to be an
outrageous and disgraceful act that potentially curtails my free and
unfettered speech.

Vale et valete bene
Caesar

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Robert Levee <galerius_of_rome@...>
wrote:
>
> Ap.Galerio Aureliano Honorable PraetoriM.Iulio Severo S.P.D.
>
> I must tell you, that I could not have rendered my case more
eloquently, than has been done by the Honorable Cn.Iulius Caesar.I
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60032 From: Cn. Cornelius Lentulus Date: 2008-12-20
Subject: R: [Nova-Roma] Re: Edictum Praetorium Curiatio-Iulio de Iurisdiction
Cn. Lentulus Cn. Caesari s. p. d.


In a peaceful and respectable way, please let me argue against your opinion, Cn. Caesar.


>>> Either this edict is the most useless one ever produced, repeating as
it does sections of the constitution and laws, or, it is a pernicious
one. <<<


I think this edict is a good starting point to have a really Roman judicial system in Nova Roma, though much improvement is still needed. You are right that it is pernicious: every judicial system that has real power is pernicious, but if a jurisdiction has not real power, then it is not efficacious either.


>>> As I said in my earlier post, I believe as others do that the
praetors over extended themselves and abrogated rights and powers
they never had, do not have and more importantly never should have. <<<


I believe that the praetors started to be what they always should have to be, what they were in in the old republic, and what they always should be in Nova Roma. The living law - as the Romans referred to them.


>>> It is the hallmark of a nascent petty oligarchy that would allow for
a magistrate to invent offences after the fact. <<<


Please allow me to say, Cn. Caesar, that you are totally wrong: this edict does not invent anything. The lex Salicia iudiciaria introduced the iurisprudentia and created the full right and possibility for the praetors to accommodate new situations, crimes, legal requests to and under existing categories, listed by the lex Salicia (it should be called "lex Salvia").

The lex Salicia iudiciaria, Pars Secunda VI.B says:

"B. Iurisprudentia: in those cases where the laws do not present an explicit treatment of a certain situation, a praetor shall create iurisprudentia (jurisprudence) applicable to all similar situations. Iurisprudentia is an expression of the Imperium of the praetor, and it has the same legislative power as a praetorial edictum. Because of this, laws approved by the Comitia shall always supersede iurisprudentia, and a certain praetor can alter previous iurisprudentia through an official edictum whenever common sense dictates that such a course of action is necessary."

The lex Salicia created iurisprudentia, and now this edict does nothing else just quotes it word by word, and applies it. And this is good, since this is the role of the praetors from antiquity.


>>> It is patently dangerous and absurd to allow magistrates the right to
pencil in offences after the fact. No citizen could ever feel safe. <<<


It would be indeed dangerous but fortunately this is not allowed in the lex Salicia, neither is this edict, because the other lex Salicia, the lex Salicia poenalis states, in Pars Prima 1.1.: "All crimes and their associated penalties shall be defined by the laws that are in force at the time of the commission of the crime." 

What the praetors can do is iurisprudentia, ie. interpreting the facts and accomodate them to stated crimes if they can do it by common sense. If they can't, then they can't accept a petitio actionis.

The praetors are amenable to law if they abused their power or they don't follow common sense.


>>>>
Look to the placement of the section on iurisprudentia. It lies in a section dedicated to crimes and penalties. <<<


Dear Cn. Caesar, you are now in the uncomfortable mistake of not checking the sources you are talking about. The ENTIRE section - like the next one - is COPIED from the text of the lex Salicia iudiciaria. It lies in that section because it lies in that section of the law, as well as the next section.


>>> Since this year's praetors took
the right of iurisprudentia and created a totally new offence, then this should not surprise us. <<<


I did not see any new offense created. They, however, applied iurisprudentia, and that was their duty, too.


>>>>This
edict can be used as justification by future Praetors to create other offences. It will be cited as precedent, not simply the trial processes but now those processes enshrined in an edict.<<<


The justification was made in 2002 by the comitia tributa of the Nova Roman people. It's called lex Salicia. And I firmly hope that we, as a revival of the Roman republic, will be lucky enough to have such future praetors who will continue issuing this edict and will improve it from year to year so that it become our own Nova Roman praetorial "edictum perpetuum", a revival of what was indeed the jewel on the crown of the Roman law.


>>> So here is how it will work. A citizen could find himself subject of
a claim that he had committed an iniuria. A praetor examining such a
claim could find that the offence of iniuria as written in law does
not apply to the facts presented. That praetor could decide
maliciously, for any number of reasons - personal friendship with the
Actor, political allegiance etc. - that he was not prepared to
dismiss the claim as it should be,
but instead would create a new
law - a form of iniuria with a different wording applicable to the
facts presented to his tribunal. <<<


Again, what you are arguing against is a law enacted more than 6 years ago, and not this edict. And the problem with what you say is that you take the "iurisprudentia" out of the context of NR legal system, old Roman legal system we revive, and common sense any legal system follows. The lex Salicia poenalis explicitly states that "All crimes and their associated penalties shall be defined by the laws", so iurisprudentia can mean under no circumstances inventing crimes and punishments. On the other hand, any magistrate can in fact abuse his potestas or imperium and decide maliciously, but after his term of office ends, he can be called to account, and sued if necessary. And what is factual mistake in your example is that no praetor can create a new law or a new crime. They can use their iurisprudentia to recognize whether a certain claim that does not apply "word by word" to the crimes listed in law is a subcategory of the crimes listed or not, relying on
common sense, on "prudence".


>>>..."look here - I have found this edict which
in itself established the iurisprudentia of a praetor <<<<


No. The iurisprudentia of the praetor was established under the Consuls M. Octavius and L. Sulla, that was 2002.


>>> being able to create a criminal offence or civil liability! <<<


No. Iurisprudentia can't create a criminal offense or civil liability, but can diagnose that a certain claim comes under an existing legal case, respecting impartially common sense and justice. For that the praetor can be called to account.


>>>> Look to the
placement of the section on iurisprudentia in the edict, for it lies in the section on crimes and penalties. <<<


No. Again, the placement of that section is not a *thing* in this edict. It is simply a copy of the law, from article to article. You did not check the sources.


>>> Even if the edict does die, the
very fact that it existed can be used to lay claim to it having created iurisprudentia, which does NOT die. That just sits there as precedent and can be invoked in the future. To ensure that this does not happen requires that this edict be killed, now. <<<


Again, I'm sorry to say that you are complaining over a fact that was decided by the people 6 years ago, and codified into a lex. This is a quite good edict and follows that law.


>>> When would edict be used nefariously? When in the future its suits
the consuls and praetors of that time to convict a person in order to
effectively remove him or her from Nova Roma. <<<


With all due respect to the great name of L. Cincinnatus, consular, censorial, former augur and flamen, he had all the possibility to avoid the condemnation. He chose not to avoid out of pride. And, so that I can show some positive in the heart of the praetor whom you think to be a monster, M. Curiatius decided not to follow the sentence of the judges that would be exilium, but offered him several ways to reduce the punishment. In view of this, I think it is unlikely that any reus who attends the court, respects the praetor and uses his right to provocatio, or just accepts the ways offered to reduce the punishments, that person, if condemned, will have a just, fair-minded, mild and supportable punishment.


Thank you for listening to my arguments.


Cura, ut valeas, et io Saturnalia!

Cn. Lentulus

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60033 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2008-12-20
Subject: E-mail delays for Gn. Iulius Caesar
Salve Gnae Iuli,

Gnaeus Iulius Caesar <gn_iulius_caesar@...> writes:

> [...] I have
> discovered that at least two of my posts to this list appear to have
> been moderated.

You are not at this moment on moderation. Nor could I find a record
in the Management log of the Nova Roma mailing list of anybody placing
you into moderated status. However, I am sure that this post I'm
replying to, at least, got put into the Yahoo spam trap. I know
because I found it there and approved it earlier this morning. You
can check the headers and you'll see

X-Yahoo-Marked-Not-Spam:
X-eGroups-Approved-By: equitius_marinus <gawne@...> via web;
20 Dec 2008 14:19:50 -0000

I'm the one who marked it "Not Spam" and then approved it for posting.

There's a problem with the spam trap in that messages placed into the
spam trap don't get forwarded to the moderators. So we have to
remember to check the spam trap. Currently it gets checked about once
a day, so anything that goes in there might sit for almost 24 hours at
the worst before being dealt with.

> Thus I have been placed on moderation,

No, you have not.

> I have yet to receive an explanation for this,

It's always difficult to guess what's going on in the depths of Yahoo.
If you look at the message I forwarded last night from the moderator
central group, you'll see that Yahoo is experiencing e-mail delays
that run up to several days. The sites worst affected are in Asia and
southern Europe, but the problems are worldwide. My guess is that
this is the root of the problem concerning your messages.

Vale,

CN-EQVIT-MARINVS
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60034 From: iulius sabinus Date: 2008-12-20
Subject: Re: E-mail delays for Gn. Iulius Caesar
Attachments :
    SALVETE!

    --- On Sat, 12/20/08, Gnaeus Equitius Marinus <gawne@cesmail.net> wrote:


    You are not at this moment on moderation. Nor could I find a record
    in the Management log of the Nova Roma mailing list of anybody placing  you into moderated status. However, I am sure that this post I'm replying to, at least, got put into the Yahoo spam trap. >>>
     
    I confirm that through the screen shoot I took for record .  See it in attach, is exactly about what Marinus talk.
     VALETE,
    IVL SABINVS
     
     
    I know because I found it there and approved it earlier this morning. You can check the headers and you'll see

    X-Yahoo-Marked- Not-Spam:
    X-eGroups-Approved- By: equitius_marinus <gawne@cesmail. net> via web;
    20 Dec 2008 14:19:50 -0000
    I'm the one who marked it "Not Spam" and then approved it for posting.

    There's a problem with the spam trap in that messages placed into the
    spam trap don't get forwarded to the moderators. So we have to
    remember to check the spam trap. Currently it gets checked about once
    a day, so anything that goes in there might sit for almost 24 hours at
    the worst before being dealt with.

    > Thus I have been placed on moderation,

    No, you have not.

    > I have yet to receive an explanation for this,

    It's always difficult to guess what's going on in the depths of Yahoo.
    If you look at the message I forwarded last night from the moderator
    central group, you'll see that Yahoo is experiencing e-mail delays
    that run up to several days. The sites worst affected are in Asia and
    southern Europe, but the problems are worldwide. My guess is that
    this is the root of the problem concerning your messages.

    Vale,

    CN-EQVIT-MARINVS

    Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60035 From: Titus Flavius Aquila Date: 2008-12-20
    Subject: AW: R: [Nova-Roma] Re: Edictum Praetorium Curiatio-Iulio de Iurisdic
    Salvete omnes,
     
    I support the statement of Cn.Cornelius Lentulus and thus the Edictum Preatorium Curiatio-Iulio de Iurisdictione Praetoris.
     
    My position has not changed during this year, the Praetors need to be placed in a position where they could defend, pursue and develop the law within our res publica Nova Roma, otherwise they would be no more than toothless tigers.
     
    This edictum will bring us closer to the living law of Roma Antiqua and will thus benfit our Republic.
     
    Optime vale
    Titus Flavius Aquila


    Von: Cn. Cornelius Lentulus <cn_corn_lent@...>
    An: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
    Gesendet: Samstag, den 20. Dezember 2008, 15:35:42 Uhr
    Betreff: R: [Nova-Roma] Re: Edictum Praetorium Curiatio-Iulio de Iurisdictione Praetoris - Responsum Fl.GA

    Cn. Lentulus Cn. Caesari s. p. d.


    In a peaceful and respectable way, please let me argue against your opinion, Cn. Caesar.


    >>> Either this edict is the most useless one ever produced, repeating as
    it does sections of the constitution and laws, or, it is a pernicious
    one. <<<


    I think this edict is a good starting point to have a really Roman judicial system in Nova Roma, though much improvement is still needed. You are right that it is pernicious: every judicial system that has real power is pernicious, but if a jurisdiction has not real power, then it is not efficacious either.


    >>> As I said in my earlier post, I believe as others
    do that the
    praetors over extended themselves and abrogated rights and powers
    they never had, do not have and more importantly never should have. <<<


    I believe that the praetors started to be what they always should have to be, what they were in in the old republic, and what they always should be in Nova Roma. The living law - as the Romans referred to them.


    >>> It is the hallmark of a nascent petty oligarchy that would allow for
    a magistrate to invent offences after the fact. <<<


    Please allow me to say, Cn. Caesar, that you are totally wrong: this edict does not invent anything. The lex Salicia iudiciaria introduced the iurisprudentia and created the full right and possibility for the praetors to accommodate new situations, crimes, legal requests to and under existing categories, listed by the lex Salicia (it should be called "lex Salvia").

    The lex Salicia iudiciaria, Pars Secunda VI.B says:

    "B. Iurisprudentia: in those cases where the laws do not present an explicit treatment of a certain situation, a praetor shall create iurisprudentia (jurisprudence) applicable to all similar situations. Iurisprudentia is an expression of the Imperium of the praetor, and it has the same legislative power as a praetorial edictum. Because of this, laws approved by the Comitia shall always supersede iurisprudentia, and a certain praetor can alter previous iurisprudentia through an official edictum whenever common sense dictates that such a course of action is necessary."

    The lex Salicia created iurisprudentia, and now this edict does nothing else just quotes it word by word, and applies it. And this is good, since this is the role of the praetors from antiquity.


    >>> It is patently dangerous and absurd to allow magistrates the right to
    pencil in offences after the fact. No citizen could ever feel safe. <<<


    It would be indeed dangerous but fortunately this is not allowed in the lex Salicia, neither is this edict, because the other lex Salicia, the lex Salicia poenalis states, in Pars Prima 1.1.: "All crimes and their associated penalties shall be defined by the laws that are in force at the time of the commission of the crime.." 

    What the praetors can do is iurisprudentia, ie. interpreting the facts and accomodate them to stated crimes if they can do it by common sense. If they can't, then they can't accept a petitio actionis.

    The praetors are amenable to law if they abused their power or they don't follow common sense.


    >>>> Look to the placement of the section on iurisprudentia. It lies in a section dedicated to crimes and penalties. <<<


    Dear Cn. Caesar, you are now in the uncomfortable mistake of not checking the sources you are talking about. The ENTIRE section - like the next one - is COPIED from the text of the lex Salicia iudiciaria. It lies in that section because it lies in that section of the law, as well as the next section.


    >>> Since this year's praetors took the right of
    iurisprudentia and created a totally new offence, then this should not surprise us. <<<


    I did not see any new offense created. They, however, applied iurisprudentia, and that was their duty, too.


    >>>>This edict can be used as justification by future Praetors to create other offences. It will be cited as precedent, not simply the trial processes but now those processes enshrined in an edict.<<<


    The justification was made in 2002 by the comitia tributa of the Nova Roman people. It's called lex Salicia. And I firmly hope that we, as a revival of the Roman republic, will be lucky enough to have such future praetors who will continue issuing this edict and will improve it from year to year so that it become our own Nova Roman praetorial "edictum perpetuum", a revival of what was indeed the jewel on the crown of the Roman law.


    >>> So here is how it will work. A citizen could find himself subject of
    a claim that he had committed an iniuria. A praetor examining such a
    claim could find that the offence of iniuria as written in law does
    not apply to the facts presented. That praetor could decide
    maliciously, for any number of reasons - personal friendship with the
    Actor, political allegiance etc. - that he was not prepared to
    dismiss the claim as it should be, but instead would create a new
    law - a form of iniuria with a different wording applicable to the
    facts presented to his tribunal. <<<


    Again, what you are arguing against is a law enacted more than 6 years ago, and not this edict.. And the problem with what you say is that you take the "iurisprudentia" out of the context of NR legal system, old Roman legal system we revive, and common sense any legal system follows. The lex Salicia poenalis explicitly states that "All crimes and their associated penalties shall be defined by the laws", so iurisprudentia can mean under no circumstances inventing crimes and punishments. On the other hand, any magistrate can in fact abuse his potestas or imperium and decide maliciously, but after his term of office ends, he can be called to account, and sued if necessary. And what is factual mistake in your example is that no praetor can create a new law or a new crime. They can use their iurisprudentia to recognize whether a certain claim that does not apply "word by word" to the crimes listed in law is a subcategory of the crimes listed or not, relying on
    common sense, on "prudence".


    >>>..."look here - I have found this edict which
    in itself established the iurisprudentia of a praetor <<<<


    No. The iurisprudentia of the praetor was established under the Consuls M. Octavius and L. Sulla, that was 2002.


    >>> being able to create a criminal offence or civil liability!
    <<<



    No. Iurisprudentia can't create a criminal offense or civil liability, but can diagnose that a certain claim comes under an existing legal case, respecting impartially common sense and justice. For that the praetor can be called to account..


    >>>> Look to the placement of the section on iurisprudentia in the edict, for it lies in the section on crimes and penalties. <<<


    No. Again, the placement of that section is not a *thing* in this edict. It is simply a copy of the law, from article to article. You did not check the sources.


    >>> Even if the edict does die, the very fact that it existed can be used to lay claim to it having created iurisprudentia, which does NOT die. That just sits there as precedent and can
    be invoked in the future. To ensure that this does not happen requires that this edict be killed, now. <<<


    Again, I'm sorry to say that you are complaining over a fact that was decided by the people 6 years ago, and codified into a lex. This is a quite good edict and follows that law.


    >>> When would edict be used nefariously? When in the future its suits
    the consuls and praetors of that time to convict a person in order to
    effectively remove him or her from Nova Roma. <<<


    With all due respect to the great name of L. Cincinnatus, consular, censorial, former augur and flamen, he had all the possibility to avoid the condemnation. He chose not to avoid out of pride. And, so that I can show some positive in the heart of the praetor whom you think to be a monster, M. Curiatius decided not to follow the sentence of the judges that would be exilium, but offered him several ways to reduce the punishment. In view of this, I think it is unlikely that any reus who attends the court, respects the praetor and uses his right to provocatio, or just accepts the ways offered to reduce the punishments, that person, if condemned, will have a just, fair-minded, mild and supportable punishment.


    Thank you for listening to my arguments.


    Cura, ut valeas, et io Saturnalia!

    Cn. Lentulus


    Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60036 From: Titus Flavius Aquila Date: 2008-12-20
    Subject: WG: AW: R: [Nova-Roma] Re: Edictum Praetorium Curiatio-Iulio de Iuri
    Salvete omnes,
     
    I need to resend my email, as it has not been published yet by Yahoo, after nearly 2 hours !
     
    Optime valete
    Titus Flavius Aquil

    ----- Weitergeleitete Mail ----
    Von: Titus Flavius Aquila <titus.aquila@...>
    An: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
    Gesendet: Samstag, den 20. Dezember 2008, 16:32:44 Uhr
    Betreff: AW: R: [Nova-Roma] Re: Edictum Praetorium Curiatio-Iulio de Iurisdictione Praetoris - Responsum Fl.GA

    Salvete omnes,
     
    I support the statement of Cn.Cornelius Lentulus and thus the Edictum Preatorium Curiatio-Iulio de Iurisdictione Praetoris.
     
    My position has not changed during this year, the Praetors need to be placed in a position where they could defend, pursue and develop the law within our res publica Nova Roma, otherwise they would be no more than toothless tigers.
     
    This edictum will bring us closer to the living law of Roma Antiqua and will thus benfit our Republic.
     
    Optime vale
    Titus Flavius Aquila


    Von: Cn. Cornelius Lentulus <cn_corn_lent@...>
    An: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
    Gesendet: Samstag, den 20. Dezember 2008, 15:35:42 Uhr
    Betreff: R: [Nova-Roma] Re: Edictum Praetorium Curiatio-Iulio de Iurisdictione Praetoris - Responsum Fl.GA

    Cn. Lentulus Cn. Caesari s. p. d.


    In a peaceful and respectable way, please let me argue against your opinion, Cn. Caesar.


    >>> Either this edict is the most useless one ever produced, repeating as
    it does sections of the constitution and laws, or, it is a pernicious
    one. <<<


    I think this edict is a good starting point to have a really Roman judicial system in Nova Roma, though much improvement is still needed. You are right that it is pernicious: every judicial system that has real power is pernicious, but if a jurisdiction has not real power, then it is not efficacious either.


    >>> As I said in my earlier post, I believe as others
    do that the
    praetors over extended themselves and abrogated rights and powers
    they never had, do not have and more importantly never should have. <<<


    I believe that the praetors started to be what they always should have to be, what they were in in the old republic, and what they always should be in Nova Roma. The living law - as the Romans referred to them.


    >>> It is the hallmark of a nascent petty oligarchy that would allow for
    a magistrate to invent offences after the fact. <<<


    Please allow me to say, Cn. Caesar, that you are totally wrong: this edict does not invent anything. The lex Salicia iudiciaria introduced the iurisprudentia and created the full right and possibility for the praetors to accommodate new situations, crimes, legal requests to and under existing categories, listed by the lex Salicia (it should be called "lex Salvia").

    The lex Salicia iudiciaria, Pars Secunda VI.B says:

    "B. Iurisprudentia: in those cases where the laws do not present an explicit treatment of a certain situation, a praetor shall create iurisprudentia (jurisprudence) applicable to all similar situations. Iurisprudentia is an expression of the Imperium of the praetor, and it has the same legislative power as a praetorial edictum. Because of this, laws approved by the Comitia shall always supersede iurisprudentia, and a certain praetor can alter previous iurisprudentia through an official edictum whenever common sense dictates that such a course of action is necessary."

    The lex Salicia created iurisprudentia, and now this edict does nothing else just quotes it word by word, and applies it. And this is good, since this is the role of the praetors from antiquity.


    >>> It is patently dangerous and absurd to allow magistrates the right to
    pencil in offences after the fact. No citizen could ever feel safe. <<<


    It would be indeed dangerous but fortunately this is not allowed in the lex Salicia, neither is this edict, because the other lex Salicia, the lex Salicia poenalis states, in Pars Prima 1.1.: "All crimes and their associated penalties shall be defined by the laws that are in force at the time of the commission of the crime.." 

    What the praetors can do is iurisprudentia, ie. interpreting the facts and accomodate them to stated crimes if they can do it by common sense. If they can't, then they can't accept a petitio actionis.

    The praetors are amenable to law if they abused their power or they don't follow common sense.


    >>>> Look to the placement of the section on iurisprudentia. It lies in a section dedicated to crimes and penalties. <<<


    Dear Cn. Caesar, you are now in the uncomfortable mistake of not checking the sources you are talking about. The ENTIRE section - like the next one - is COPIED from the text of the lex Salicia iudiciaria. It lies in that section because it lies in that section of the law, as well as the next section.


    >>> Since this year's praetors took the right of
    iurisprudentia and created a totally new offence, then this should not surprise us. <<<


    I did not see any new offense created. They, however, applied iurisprudentia, and that was their duty, too.


    >>>>This edict can be used as justification by future Praetors to create other offences. It will be cited as precedent, not simply the trial processes but now those processes enshrined in an edict.<<<


    The justification was made in 2002 by the comitia tributa of the Nova Roman people. It's called lex Salicia. And I firmly hope that we, as a revival of the Roman republic, will be lucky enough to have such future praetors who will continue issuing this edict and will improve it from year to year so that it become our own Nova Roman praetorial "edictum perpetuum", a revival of what was indeed the jewel on the crown of the Roman law.


    >>> So here is how it will work. A citizen could find himself subject of
    a claim that he had committed an iniuria. A praetor examining such a
    claim could find that the offence of iniuria as written in law does
    not apply to the facts presented. That praetor could decide
    maliciously, for any number of reasons - personal friendship with the
    Actor, political allegiance etc. - that he was not prepared to
    dismiss the claim as it should be, but instead would create a new
    law - a form of iniuria with a different wording applicable to the
    facts presented to his tribunal. <<<


    Again, what you are arguing against is a law enacted more than 6 years ago, and not this edict.. And the problem with what you say is that you take the "iurisprudentia" out of the context of NR legal system, old Roman legal system we revive, and common sense any legal system follows. The lex Salicia poenalis explicitly states that "All crimes and their associated penalties shall be defined by the laws", so iurisprudentia can mean under no circumstances inventing crimes and punishments. On the other hand, any magistrate can in fact abuse his potestas or imperium and decide maliciously, but after his term of office ends, he can be called to account, and sued if necessary. And what is factual mistake in your example is that no praetor can create a new law or a new crime. They can use their iurisprudentia to recognize whether a certain claim that does not apply "word by word" to the crimes listed in law is a subcategory of the crimes listed or not, relying on
    common sense, on "prudence".


    >>>..."look here - I have found this edict which
    in itself established the iurisprudentia of a praetor <<<<


    No. The iurisprudentia of the praetor was established under the Consuls M. Octavius and L. Sulla, that was 2002.


    >>> being able to create a criminal offence or civil liability!
    <<<



    No. Iurisprudentia can't create a criminal offense or civil liability, but can diagnose that a certain claim comes under an existing legal case, respecting impartially common sense and justice. For that the praetor can be called to account..


    >>>> Look to the placement of the section on iurisprudentia in the edict, for it lies in the section on crimes and penalties. <<<


    No. Again, the placement of that section is not a *thing* in this edict. It is simply a copy of the law, from article to article. You did not check the sources.


    >>> Even if the edict does die, the very fact that it existed can be used to lay claim to it having created iurisprudentia, which does NOT die. That just sits there as precedent and can
    be invoked in the future. To ensure that this does not happen requires that this edict be killed, now. <<<


    Again, I'm sorry to say that you are complaining over a fact that was decided by the people 6 years ago, and codified into a lex. This is a quite good edict and follows that law.


    >>> When would edict be used nefariously? When in the future its suits
    the consuls and praetors of that time to convict a person in order to
    effectively remove him or her from Nova Roma. <<<


    With all due respect to the great name of L. Cincinnatus, consular, censorial, former augur and flamen, he had all the possibility to avoid the condemnation. He chose not to avoid out of pride. And, so that I can show some positive in the heart of the praetor whom you think to be a monster, M. Curiatius decided not to follow the sentence of the judges that would be exilium, but offered him several ways to reduce the punishment. In view of this, I think it is unlikely that any reus who attends the court, respects the praetor and uses his right to provocatio, or just accepts the ways offered to reduce the punishments, that person, if condemned, will have a just, fair-minded, mild and supportable punishment.


    Thank you for listening to my arguments.


    Cura, ut valeas, et io Saturnalia!

    Cn. Lentulus



    Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60037 From: Titus Iulius Sabinus Date: 2008-12-20
    Subject: WG: AW: R: [Nova-Roma] Re: For Aquila + more about messages delay.
    SALVE AMICE ET SALVETE!

    --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Titus Flavius Aquila
    <titus.aquila@...> wrote:

    > I need to resend my email, as it has not been published yet by
    Yahoo, after nearly 2 hours !>>>

    I just approved them because arrived in the Spam trap.

    In the last time it seems that more and more messages arrive in the
    Spam trap. Under my experience, I think that is happen because an
    increase of anti-spam protection decided by the providers for this
    period of the year. We are in a period when all who deals with e-
    commerce try in any possible way to advertise their businesses and to
    take the advantage of the forthcoming winter holydays. The entire
    network is full of these offers and is possible as sometime the anti-
    spam to make not differences among messages.

    In our specific case the situation is happen for those who send
    messages to this list using computers from their working place and
    via mobile network. Probably more causes are but I want to announce
    our people that moderators were advertised by Marinus who keep in
    connection very close with the Yahoo service and they are at duty.
    Some delays can occur because the time zone differences but is not a
    major problem. People can check directly the groups lists because, as
    Marinus pointed out, in some area of the world are delays in the mail
    box arrivals.

    Thank you.

    VALETE,
    IVL SABINVS
    Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60038 From: Titus Flavius Aquila Date: 2008-12-20
    Subject: AW: WG: AW: R: [Nova-Roma] Re: For Aquila + more about messages dela
    Salve Amice et salvete !
     
    Thank you for your explanation. I was sending the mail from my own PC, from home. You have stated ,that this is occuring more often , maybe we should really consider how we can improve our mail transfer and to safeguard the delivery of our mail, with or without Yahoo.
     
    Optime valete
    Titus Flavius Aquila


    Von: Titus Iulius Sabinus <iulius_sabinus@...>
    An: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
    Gesendet: Samstag, den 20. Dezember 2008, 18:43:37 Uhr
    Betreff: WG: AW: R: [Nova-Roma] Re: For Aquila + more about messages delay.

    SALVE AMICE ET SALVETE!

    --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com, Titus Flavius Aquila
    <titus.aquila@ ...> wrote:

    > I need to resend my email, as it has not been published yet by
    Yahoo, after nearly 2 hours !>>>

    I just approved them because arrived in the Spam trap.

    In the last time it seems that more and more messages arrive in the
    Spam trap. Under my experience, I think that is happen because an
    increase of anti-spam protection decided by the providers for this
    period of the year. We are in a period when all who deals with e-
    commerce try in any possible way to advertise their businesses and to
    take the advantage of the forthcoming winter holydays. The entire
    network is full of these offers and is possible as sometime the anti-
    spam to make not differences among messages.

    In our specific case the situation is happen for those who send
    messages to this list using computers from their working place and
    via mobile network. Probably more causes are but I want to announce
    our people that moderators were advertised by Marinus who keep in
    connection very close with the Yahoo service and they are at duty.
    Some delays can occur because the time zone differences but is not a
    major problem. People can check directly the groups lists because, as
    Marinus pointed out, in some area of the world are delays in the mail
    box arrivals.

    Thank you.

    VALETE,
    IVL SABINVS


    Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60039 From: Lucia Livia Plauta Date: 2008-12-20
    Subject: Re: Revival of gladiatorial tuornaments in Rome
    L. Livia Plauta M. Octavio Corvo S.P.D.

    First, my compliments for your Italian, which must be good if you
    could read this article.

    There has been a shift in the way italian public opinion considers
    ancient Rome, because it seems that finally enough time has passed
    for it to lose its psychological association with fascism.

    Initiatives like this fit into Berlusconi's policy of making museums
    more spectacular and more "american", a policy which should be
    welcome, if it will mean "easier to read" museums, with multilingual
    information boards, and maybe even that museums will be open in the
    afternoon!

    But this does not mean that the attitude to Cultus Deorum has changed
    in any way.
    What the majority of Italians would think of it if they had ever
    heard about it, is that its followers must be satanists or mental
    patients. The biggest organization that tries to revive religio
    Romana in Italy (and the only one in Rome) is still the MTR
    (Movimento Tradizionale Romano), a barely disguised neofascist
    organization.

    So I'm afraid there is no positive shift that we can use for the PRO
    DIIS project.

    Optime vale,
    Livia

    --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Marcvs Octavivs Corvvs"
    <mcorvvs@...> wrote:
    >
    > La Reppublica has posted the article abour the attempt to revive
    > gladiatorial combats in Colosseum:
    > http://ricerca.repubblica.it/repubblica/archivio/
    repubblica/2008/12/19/t
    > ornino-al-colosseo-combattimenti-tra-gladiatori.html
    > this is an initiative of Member of City council Umberto Broccoli.
    > Perhaps this information signifies the positive shift in opinions
    which
    > can use for PRO DIIS project?
    >
    > Merry Saturnalia to all Novaromans! :)
    >
    > CORVVS
    >
    Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60040 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2008-12-20
    Subject: Re: For Aquila + more about messages delay.
    Titus Flavius Aquila <titus.aquila@...> writes:

    > maybe we should really consider how we can improve our mail transfer
    > and to safeguard the delivery of our mail, with or without Yahoo.

    In the short term, if you or any other citizen reading this sends a
    message to the main list or any other list under praetorian
    supervision, and that message does not appear within a reasonable
    time, you're welcome to write directly to me about it. I don't stay
    logged in all the time, but I will look into any issues brought to my
    attention and provide a quick response to whomever brings a matter to
    my attention.

    Vale,

    CN-EQVIT-MARINVS
    Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60041 From: Nabarz Date: 2008-12-20
    Subject: Merry Solstice
    Salve,

    Wishing you all a great Dies Natalis Solis Invicti / Winter Solstice/
    Shabe Yalda/ Yule.


    Yule
    The sun is setting low on the western horizon.
    Sky serpent swallowing him once more
    Yule night has arrived; sun's longest slumber.

    We eat and drink all that is red
    Wine, pomegranate and watermelon,
    The colour of dawn, a reminder of what we eagerly wait for.

    Shamash, Marduk, Sekhmet,
    Descending immortals, you'll rise again
    Apollo, Ra salutations to you.

    Good night Osiris, weak and tired lying in your coffin,
    Enclosed by darkness, tricked by Seth again!
    An infant sun is born, Horus soaring up onto the sky.

    Mithras born of a rock and out from the cave,
    Becoming sol invictus and turning the wheel
    Darkness, now a fading memory.

    Oak king sings outside, as the Holly king lays slain
    Dawn has arrived, Yule has ended.
    Drink up your wine

    -by Nabarz.
    Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60042 From: Complutensis Date: 2008-12-20
    Subject: Re: Fwd: [moderatorcentral] Severed Cables Causing Email Delays

    Salve Marine et salvete omnes

     

    Probably this problem was the cause that I was without internet connection today.

     

    Now I am receiving the messages.

     

    Valete

     

    M·CVR·COMPLVTENSIS
    Praetor Novae Romae

    Senator
    Praetor Hispaniae
    Scriba Censoris K·F·B·M

    -----Mensaje original-----
    De: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com [mailto:Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com] En nombre de Gnaeus Equitius Marinus
    Enviado el: sábado, 20 de diciembre de 2008 3:00
    Para: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
    Asunto: [Nova-Roma] Fwd: [moderatorcentral] Severed Cables Causing Email Delays

     

    Forwarded FYI. Especially pertinent to citizens in southern Europe.

    Valete,

    -- Marinus

    ----- Forwarded message from gordonst@yahoo- inc.com -----
    Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 15:54:47 -0800
    From: Gordon Strause <gordonst@yahoo- inc.com>
    Reply-To: moderatorcentral- owner@yahoogroup s.com
    Subject: [moderatorcentral] Severed Cables Causing Email Delays
    To: moderatorcentral@ yahoogroups. com

    http://tinyurl. com/severedcable
    http://www.bloomber g.com/apps/ news?pid= 20601085& sid=ayPbWf_ 7l17w&refer= europe

    The severed cables described in the article above are affecting
    Yahoo!'s data connections. One consequence is that group members may
    find the delivery of some messages to their inbox delayed until this
    problem is resolved (which could be days or weeks).

    This problem is likely to primarily affect Yahoo! Groups users in
    India but will not be limited to them. So if you suspect you're not
    receiving all messages that have been posted to a group, we highly
    encourage you to visit the group's message archive.

    Thank you,

    - Gordon
    Yahoo! Groups Team

    P.S. Unrelated to this issue, beginning at 3 pm (PST) yesterday there
    was a problem with some of the "Contact Us" links in Groups
    Help.

    Clicking those links is supposed to bring a user to this page:
    http://tinyurl. com/groupshelp
    http://help. yahoo.com/ l/us/yahoo/ groups/original/ members/forms/ forms_index. html

    But some of the "Contact Us" links were not working correctly
    yesterday afternoon through earlier today. However, that issue has now
    been fully resolved.

    P.P.S. As always, if you have follow up question, please contact
    Customer Care at the address above. Replies to this message will NOT
    get a response. Thank you.

    ------------ --------- --------- ------

    Visit the Groups Blog at: http://www.ygroupsb log.com/blog/ Yahoo! Groups Links

    ----- End forwarded message -----

    CN-EQVIT-MARINVS

    Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60043 From: Gnaeus Caelius Ahenobarbus Date: 2008-12-20
    Subject: Re: Fwd: [moderatorcentral] Severed Cables Causing Email Delays
    I highly doubt it. Those cables affect traffic going from Europe to Middle Eastern, African, and South Asian nations. Unless you're trying to get to a website in India or Afghanistan, your Internet problems stem from elsewhere.
     
    --
    Gnaeus Caelius Ahenobarbus
    Aedilis Oppidi, Oppidum Fluminis Gilae, America Austroccidentalis
    Accensus, cos. M. Moravius Piscinus Horatianus et T. Iulius Sabinus
    http://becomingnewthroughtheold.blogspot.com



    From: Complutensis <complutensis@...>
    To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
    Sent: Saturday, December 20, 2008 12:55:59 PM
    Subject: RE: [Nova-Roma] Fwd: [moderatorcentral] Severed Cables Causing Email Delays

    Salve Marine et salvete omnes

     

    Probably this problem was the cause that I was without internet connection today.

     

    Now I am receiving the messages.

     

    Valete

     

    M·CVR·COMPLVTENSIS
    Praetor Novae Romae

    Senator
    Praetor Hispaniae
    Scriba Censoris K·F·B·M

    -----Mensaje original---- -
    De: Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com [mailto:Nova- Roma@yahoogroups .com] En nombre de Gnaeus Equitius Marinus
    Enviado el: sábado, 20 de diciembre de 2008 3:00
    Para: Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com
    Asunto: [Nova-Roma] Fwd: [moderatorcentral] Severed Cables Causing Email Delays

     

    Forwarded FYI. Especially pertinent to citizens in southern Europe.

    Valete,

    -- Marinus

    ----- Forwarded message from gordonst@yahoo- inc.com -----
    Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 15:54:47 -0800
    From: Gordon Strause <gordonst@yahoo- inc.com>
    Reply-To: moderatorcentral- owner@yahoogroup s.com
    Subject: [moderatorcentral] Severed Cables Causing Email Delays
    To: moderatorcentral@ yahoogroups. com

    http://tinyurl. com/severedcable
    http://www.bloomber g.com/apps/ news?pid= 20601085& sid=ayPbWf_ 7l17w&refer= europe

    The severed cables described in the article above are affecting
    Yahoo!'s data connections.. One consequence is that group members may
    find the delivery of some messages to their inbox delayed until this
    problem is resolved (which could be days or weeks).

    This problem is likely to primarily affect Yahoo! Groups users in
    India but will not be limited to them. So if you suspect you're not
    receiving all messages that have been posted to a group, we highly
    encourage you to visit the group's message archive.

    Thank you,

    - Gordon
    Yahoo! Groups Team

    P.S. Unrelated to this issue, beginning at 3 pm (PST) yesterday there
    was a problem with some of the "Contact Us" links in Groups
    Help.

    Clicking those links is supposed to bring a user to this page:
    http://tinyurl. com/groupshelp
    http://help. yahoo.com/ l/us/yahoo/ groups/original/ members/forms/ forms_index. html

    But some of the "Contact Us" links were not working correctly
    yesterday afternoon through earlier today. However, that issue has now
    been fully resolved.

    P.P.S. As always, if you have follow up question, please contact
    Customer Care at the address above. Replies to this message will NOT
    get a response. Thank you.

    ------------ --------- --------- ------

    Visit the Groups Blog at: http://www.ygroupsb log.com/blog/ Yahoo! Groups Links

    ----- End forwarded message -----

    CN-EQVIT-MARINVS


    Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60044 From: Complutensis Date: 2008-12-20
    Subject: Re: Edictum Praetorium Curiatio-Iulio de Iurisdictione Praetoris -

    Salve Lentule

     

    Gratias plurimas for your words, you have explain very well the sense and the intentio of the Edict.

     

    Cura ut valeas

     

    M·CVR·COMPLVTENSIS
    Praetor Novae Romae

    Senator
    Praetor Hispaniae
    Scriba Censoris K·F·B·M

    -----Mensaje original-----
    De: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com [mailto:Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com] En nombre de Cn. Cornelius Lentulus
    Enviado el: sábado, 20 de diciembre de 2008 15:36
    Para: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
    Asunto: R: [Nova-Roma] Re: Edictum Praetorium Curiatio-Iulio de Iurisdictione Praetoris - Responsum Fl.GA

     

    Cn. Lentulus Cn. Caesari s. p. d.


    In a peaceful and respectable way, please let me argue against your opinion, Cn. Caesar.


    >>> Either this edict is the most useless one ever produced,
    repeating as
    it does sections of the constitution and laws, or, it is a pernicious
    one. <<<



    I think this edict is a good starting point to have a really Roman judicial system in Nova Roma, though much improvement is still needed. You are right that it is pernicious: every judicial system that has real power is pernicious, but if a jurisdiction has not real power, then it is not efficacious either.


    >>> As I said in my earlier post, I believe as others do that the
    praetors over extended themselves and abrogated rights and powers
    they never had, do not have and more importantly never should have. <<<


    I believe that the praetors started to be what they always should have to be, what they were in in the old republic, and what they always should be in Nova Roma. The living law - as the Romans referred to them.


    >>> It is the hallmark of a nascent petty oligarchy that would allow
    for
    a magistrate to invent offences after the fact. <<<


    Please allow me to say, Cn. Caesar, that you are totally wrong: this edict does not invent anything. The lex Salicia iudiciaria introduced the iurisprudentia and created the full right and possibility for the praetors to accommodate new situations, crimes, legal requests to and under existing categories, listed by the lex Salicia (it should be called "lex Salvia").

    The lex Salicia iudiciaria, Pars Secunda VI.B says:

    "B. Iurisprudentia: in those cases where the laws do not present an explicit treatment of a certain situation, a praetor shall create iurisprudentia (jurisprudence) applicable to all similar situations. Iurisprudentia is an expression of the Imperium of the praetor, and it has the same legislative power as a praetorial edictum. Because of this, laws approved by the Comitia shall always supersede iurisprudentia, and a certain praetor can alter previous iurisprudentia through an official edictum whenever common sense dictates that such a course of action is necessary."

    The lex Salicia created iurisprudentia, and now this edict does nothing else just quotes it word by word, and applies it. And this is good, since this is the role of the praetors from antiquity.


    >>> It is patently dangerous and absurd to allow magistrates the
    right to
    pencil in offences after the fact. No citizen could ever feel safe. <<<


    It would be indeed dangerous but fortunately this is not allowed in the lex Salicia, neither is this edict, because the other lex Salicia, the lex Salicia poenalis states, in Pars Prima 1.1.: "All crimes and their associated penalties shall be defined by the laws that are in force at the time of the commission of the crime." 

    What the praetors can do is iurisprudentia, ie. interpreting the facts and accomodate them to stated crimes if they can do it by common sense. If they can't, then they can't accept a petitio actionis.

    The praetors are amenable to law if they abused their power or they don't follow common sense.


    >>>> Look to the placement of the section on iurisprudentia. It
    lies in a section dedicated to crimes and penalties. <<<



    Dear Cn. Caesar, you are now in the uncomfortable mistake of not checking the sources you are talking about. The ENTIRE section - like the next one - is COPIED from the text of the lex Salicia iudiciaria. It lies in that section because it lies in that section of the law, as well as the next section.


    >>> Since this year's praetors took the right of iurisprudentia and
    created a totally new offence, then this should not surprise us. <<<



    I did not see any new offense created. They, however, applied iurisprudentia, and that was their duty, too.


    >>>>This edict can be used as justification by future Praetors to
    create other offences. It will be cited as precedent, not simply the trial processes but now those processes enshrined in an edict.<<<


    The justification was made in 2002 by the comitia tributa of the Nova Roman people. It's called lex Salicia. And I firmly hope that we, as a revival of the Roman republic, will be lucky enough to have such future praetors who will continue issuing this edict and will improve it from year to year so that it become our own Nova Roman praetorial "edictum perpetuum", a revival of what was indeed the jewel on the crown of the Roman law.


    >>> So here is how it will work. A citizen could find himself
    subject of
    a claim that he had committed an iniuria. A praetor examining such a
    claim could find that the offence of iniuria as written in law does
    not apply to the facts presented. That praetor could decide
    maliciously, for any number of reasons - personal friendship with the
    Actor, political allegiance etc. - that he was not prepared to
    dismiss the claim as it should be, but instead would create a new
    law - a form of iniuria with a different wording applicable to the
    facts presented to his tribunal. <<<



    Again, what you are arguing against is a law enacted more than 6 years ago, and not this edict. And the problem with what you say is that you take the "iurisprudentia" out of the context of NR legal system, old Roman legal system we revive, and common sense any legal system follows. The lex Salicia poenalis explicitly states that "All crimes and their associated penalties shall be defined by the laws", so iurisprudentia can mean under no circumstances inventing crimes and punishments. On the other hand, any magistrate can in fact abuse his potestas or imperium and decide maliciously, but after his term of office ends, he can be called to account, and sued if necessary. And what is factual mistake in your example is that no praetor can create a new law or a new crime. They can use their iurisprudentia to recognize whether a certain claim that does not apply "word by word" to the crimes listed in law is a subcategory of the crimes listed or not, relying on
    common sense, on "prudence".


    >>>..."look here - I have found this edict which
    in itself established the iurisprudentia of a praetor <<<<



    No. The iurisprudentia of the praetor was established under the Consuls M. Octavius and L. Sulla, that was 2002.


    >>> being able to create a criminal offence or civil liability!
    <<<


    No. Iurisprudentia can't create a criminal offense or civil liability, but can diagnose that a certain claim comes under an existing legal case, respecting impartially common sense and justice. For that the praetor can be called to account.


    >>>> Look to the placement of the section on iurisprudentia in
    the edict, for it lies in the section on crimes and penalties. <<<



    No. Again, the placement of that section is not a *thing* in this edict. It is simply a copy of the law, from article to article. You did not check the sources.


    >>> Even if the edict does die, the very fact that it existed can be used to lay claim to it having created iurisprudentia, which does NOT die. That just sits there as precedent and can be invoked in the future. To ensure that this does not happen requires that this edict be killed, now. <<<


    Again, I'm sorry to say that you are complaining over a fact that was decided by the people 6 years ago, and codified into a lex. This is a quite good edict and follows that law.


    >>> When would edict be used nefariously? When in the future its
    suits
    the consuls and praetors of that time to convict a person in order to
    effectively remove him or her from Nova Roma. <<<



    With all due respect to the great name of L. Cincinnatus, consular, censorial, former augur and flamen, he had all the possibility to avoid the condemnation. He chose not to avoid out of pride. And, so that I can show some positive in the heart of the praetor whom you think to be a monster, M. Curiatius decided not to follow the sentence of the judges that would be exilium, but offered him several ways to reduce the punishment. In view of this, I think it is unlikely that any reus who attends the court, respects the praetor and uses his right to provocatio, or just accepts the ways offered to reduce the punishments, that person, if condemned, will have a just, fair-minded, mild and supportable punishment.


    Thank you for listening to my arguments.


    Cura, ut valeas, et io Saturnalia!

    Cn. Lentulus

     

    Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60045 From: iohannkn Date: 2008-12-20
    Subject: Re: Merry Solstice

    Dulcissime mihi lectu sensuque tuum carmen, Nabarz! Valde hac in Hieme vale.


    --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Nabarz" <nabarz@...> wrote:
    >
    > Salve,
    >
    > Wishing you all a great Dies Natalis Solis Invicti / Winter Solstice/
    > Shabe Yalda/ Yule.
    >
    >
    > Yule
    > The sun is setting low on the western horizon.
    > Sky serpent swallowing him once more
    > Yule night has arrived; sun's longest slumber.
    >
    > We eat and drink all that is red
    > Wine, pomegranate and watermelon,
    > The colour of dawn, a reminder of what we eagerly wait for.
    >
    > Shamash, Marduk, Sekhmet,
    > Descending immortals, you'll rise again
    > Apollo, Ra salutations to you.
    >
    > Good night Osiris, weak and tired lying in your coffin,
    > Enclosed by darkness, tricked by Seth again!
    > An infant sun is born, Horus soaring up onto the sky.
    >
    > Mithras born of a rock and out from the cave,
    > Becoming sol invictus and turning the wheel
    > Darkness, now a fading memory.
    >
    > Oak king sings outside, as the Holly king lays slain
    > Dawn has arrived, Yule has ended.
    > Drink up your wine
    >
    > -by Nabarz.
    >

    Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60046 From: L Julia Aquila Date: 2008-12-20
    Subject: Re: The Coloniae Romanae List (attempt 2)

     Salvéte,

     

    Before we purchase land we have to raise money, create a business plan with short and long term goals, implement public relations and a lot of other ground work to build a strong foundation.

    This is an opportunity for us to come together as New Romans with a unified purpose with a clear focus. Many good things could come from this even before the actual acquisition of land, which is our ultimate goal.

    Everyone can participate, even if you only a little time to give, even if cives scout for possibilities in their own areas while going about their own business.

    We have committees being formed and citizens volunteering but we need more volunteers to co-chair committees and to pitch in.

    This is an opportunity for every citizen to truly get involved and put forth an effort. We need co-chairs, people to help with business plans, finance, law, suggestions for fund raising and people to implement them.

    We need citizens from all walks of life to work together.

    This is your project and there is a lot of work to do before we buy land in Europe and in the US.

    I want to make mention regarding the honorable work that has been done on this project in the past, even before Coloniae-Roma was formed. We honor those citizens and the work they have done to date.

     

    Valéte,

    Julia Aquila

     

    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Coloniae-Romanae/

     

     


    --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Gnaeus Caelius Ahenobarbus <cn.caelius@...> wrote:
    >
    > (This is the second attempt at posting to the list. The first message never came through. -- GCA)
    >
    > Cn. Caelius Ahenobarbus omnibus salutem plurimam dicit
    >
    > With
    > all the discussion about the land fund and such, I feel this is the
    > right time to announce a list. A little while back, I started
    > discussing this subject with other Novi Romani. To facilitate
    > discussion, we created a list: Coloniae-Romanae. Its goal is to give us
    > a place to dicuss, in detail, the discovery of land and the purchase
    > thereof, and to create real Roman communities. There are already some
    > good messages there. If you're interested, go to the URL below and
    > request membership. The list is currently moderated, but you should be
    > approved quickly.
    >
    > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Coloniae-Romanae/
    >
    > To the dream of a Roman settlement! Optime valete!
    > --
    > Gnaeus Caelius Ahenobarbus
    > Aedilis Oppidi, Oppidum Fluminis Gilae, America Austroccidentalis
    > Accensus, cos. M. Moravius Piscinus Horatianus et T. Iulius Sabinus
    > http://becomingnewthroughtheold.blogspot.com
    >
    Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60047 From: Libero Date: 2008-12-20
    Subject: R: [Nova-Roma] Re: Revival of gladiatorial tuornaments in Rome

     

    Spectata Livia Plauta,

     

    I hope you won’t mind letting me give a few information “first hand”, given that I am Italian.





    There has been a shift in the way italian public opinion considers
    ancient Rome , because it seems that finally enough time has passed
    for it to lose its psychological association with fascism.

     

    Nobody in Italy have seen Rome psychologically associated with Fascism for the last 40 years, at least.

    Well, if not nobody, just very very few associated Rome and Fascism after World War II. The vast majority thought that the love for Rome fascists had, was abusive. No shifts, then.



    Initiatives like this fit into Berlusconi's policy of making museums
    more spectacular and more "american", a policy which should be
    welcome, if it will mean "easier to read" museums, with multilingual
    information boards, and maybe even that museums will be open in the
    afternoon!

    I have never been in America , so I do not know how an American museum looks like.

    It is widely claimed in Italy that yes, Italian museums are getting more American.

    What I know is that our museums are getting worse. Childish explanation, comics, large useless boards filled with sillynesses.

    “Slyppery surface”, “mind the gap”, “mind your head” boars every where; shops selling useless ugly toys: that’s what we in more American museum.

    At the same time, less objects on display.



    But this does not mean that the attitude to Cultus Deorum has changed
    in any way.
    What the majority of Italians would think of it if they had ever
    heard about it, is that its followers must be satanists or mental
    patients.

     

    Obviously  few Italians ever heard about Cultus Deorum.

    But no, that idea is not linked with Satanism, and it wouldn’t. Rome , in Italy , is at the same time our history and…..”ourselves”.

    Even the Church is…….Roman!

    Mental patients, yeah…..maybe….more probably simply dreamers.

     The biggest organization that tries to revive religio
    Romana in Italy (and the only one in Rome ) is still the MTR
    (Movimento Tradizionale Romano), a barely disguised neofascist
    organization.

     

    I perfectly know MTR, I regularly read their papers, I know first hand many members and, to give an example, two hours ago I received an sms about Dies Natalis Solis  by one of the chairmans. I sometimes participate in their activities.

    BARELY DISGUISED NEOFASCIST ORGANIZATION.

    My Englisg is poor, but I understand that you are stating that MTR is made by fascists that try to disguise, to cover , the fact that they are fascists. Moreover, the word “barely” gives the idea that they would like to hide better than they can do.

    Sorry, Plauta. MTR is not a fascist or neofascist organizations.

    I have no idea if people in America is able or apt to understand what Fascism was: I think it is impossible for you, but it is only an opinion.

    Well, we have to choose one: either you don’t know what Fascism really is; or you do not know what MTR is. Tertium non datur.

    Moreover, “neofascist” is surely derogatory in Italian, I suppose it be derogatory in English too. Let’s avoid derogatory words.

    Yes, I understand you would call fascists some of them. I can even admit that some of them would not dislike some specific aspects of Fascism. So what?

    This is not enough for calling an organization FASCIST. Most of all if the intention is to offend.

    Anyway, you know, I don’t want to be impolite towards people in the Usa , but if criticism of Italian history and Italian culture comes from the USA ….well…..we find it a bit difficult to accept lessons.

    We might discuss what Fascism did for the renaissasnce of Roman culture and civilization in Italy . And I am speaking of diggings, opening of museum (without multilingual boards), money spent in creating universities and so on. And they did something of paramount importance. Unrivalled until today, like it or not.

    I think it would be best to avoid “philosophical” discussion. I don’t mind, though….

    Or you could give us some hints stating what aspects of MTR are fascist. That would be to me of great interest.

     

    Reverenter

     

    Gallus Solaris Alexander

    Bononiae

    ITALIA!




    Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60048 From: James V Hooper Date: 2008-12-20
    Subject: Re: Merry Solstice
    Hail to the Sun God
    We greet thee this bright morn!
    We welcome you into this world,
    New from the Lady born.

    Our dreams, like you, begin to grow
    With the melt of winter snow
    Our strength increases with your light
    For now has passed the longest night.

    Blessed Yule to all.

    Valete,
    Gaius Pompeius Marcellus








    On Sat, 20 Dec 2008 19:14:55 -0000
    "Nabarz" <nabarz@...> wrote:
    > Salve,
    >
    > Wishing you all a great Dies Natalis Solis Invicti / Winter Solstice/
    > Shabe Yalda/ Yule.
    >
    >
    > Yule
    > The sun is setting low on the western horizon.
    > Sky serpent swallowing him once more
    > Yule night has arrived; sun's longest slumber.
    >
    > We eat and drink all that is red
    > Wine, pomegranate and watermelon,
    > The colour of dawn, a reminder of what we eagerly wait for.
    >
    > Shamash, Marduk, Sekhmet,
    > Descending immortals, you'll rise again
    > Apollo, Ra salutations to you.
    >
    > Good night Osiris, weak and tired lying in your coffin,
    > Enclosed by darkness, tricked by Seth again!
    > An infant sun is born, Horus soaring up onto the sky.
    >
    > Mithras born of a rock and out from the cave,
    > Becoming sol invictus and turning the wheel
    > Darkness, now a fading memory.
    >
    > Oak king sings outside, as the Holly king lays slain
    > Dawn has arrived, Yule has ended.
    > Drink up your wine
    >
    > -by Nabarz.
    >
    >
    >

    BB,
    Warrior
    Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60049 From: Lucia Livia Plauta Date: 2008-12-20
    Subject: R: [Nova-Roma] Re: Revival of gladiatorial tuornaments in Rome
    L. Livia Plauta Gallo Solari Alexandro S,P.D.

    (English translation follows)
    Caro Alexander, si vede che non frequenti molto la lista italiana di
    NR (Pomerium), se mi prendi per americana.
    Purtroppo so di quello che parlo, infatti appena ho raccontato a
    parenti a amici di essermi unita a Nova Roma, la prima domanda di
    tutti è stata: "ma non sono fascisti?"

    Forse sei molto giovane, oppure frequenti gente priva di coscienza
    storica, tutte ragioni per cui potresti non esserti accorto che nella
    mente di molta gente Roma e il fascismo sono ancora indissolubilmente
    legati.

    Per quanto riguarda l'"americanizzazione" dei musei capisco le tue
    preoccupazioni, e queste cose danno fastidio anche a me, sono però un
    piccolo prezzo da pagare se poi ci sono anche ricostruzioni virtuali,
    pannelli esplicativi in varie lingue, ecc.

    Per quanto riguarda il MTR, se non vuoi chiamarli neofascisti, li
    chiamerò criptofascisti.
    Adesso è molto di moda riproporre le ideologie fasciste pur negando
    di essere fascisti. Io però, come sanno quelli che mi conoscono, sono
    una che chiama le cose con il loro nome, quindi quelli li chiamo
    fascisti, fascisti, fascisti.

    Ho avuto occasione di vedere parecchi di loro il 21 aprile scorso a
    Roma, durante una visita dei fori da loro organizzata. Li ho visti in
    faccia, li ho sentiti parlare, e ti assicuro che io i fascisti li so
    riconoscere. Per non parlare del loro modo di fare l'osculatio, che
    finisce in saluto fascista ...

    Ah, visto che sei di Bononia, salutami Marullinus, che ho avuto
    occasione di incontrare molto meno di quanto sperassi.


    Dear Alexander, it shows that you are not very present on the italian
    NR list (Pomerium), if you think I'm american.
    Unfortunately I know what I'm talking about. In fact, when I told
    relatives and friends that I joined Nova Roma, their first question
    was invariably: "but aren't they fascists?"

    Maybe you are very young, or you only have friends without
    historical conscience, so you might not have realized that in the
    minds of many people ancient Rome is still stronlgy linked with
    fascism.

    I understand your worries about the "americanization" of museums, and
    these things disturb me as well, but they are a small price to pay,
    if there are also virtual reconstructions, multilingual panels, etc.

    As to MTR, if you don't want to call them neofascists, I'll call them
    cryptofascists.
    Nowadays it's very fashionable to repropose fascist ideologies, even
    while negating being fascist. But, as the people who know me know, I
    call things with their name, so I call those people fascists,
    fascists, fascists.

    I have had the chance to meet a lot of them last April 21 in Rome,
    during a visit of the Imperial fora they organized. I saw their
    faces, I heard them talk, and I assure you that I can recognize
    fascists. Not to talk about their way of doing osculatio, ending with
    a fascist salute ...

    Ah, and since you are from Bononia, please say hello for me to
    Marullinus, whom I had the chance to meet less times than I wished.

    Optime vale,
    Livia
    >
    >
    > Spectata Livia Plauta,
    >
    >
    >
    > I hope you won't mind letting me give a few information "first
    hand", given
    > that I am Italian.
    >
    > _____
    >
    >
    >
    >
    > There has been a shift in the way italian public opinion considers
    > ancient Rome, because it seems that finally enough time has passed
    > for it to lose its psychological association with fascism.
    >
    >
    >
    > Nobody in Italy have seen Rome psychologically associated with
    Fascism for
    > the last 40 years, at least.
    >
    > Well, if not nobody, just very very few associated Rome and Fascism
    after
    > World War II. The vast majority thought that the love for Rome
    fascists had,
    > was abusive. No shifts, then.
    >
    >
    >
    > Initiatives like this fit into Berlusconi's policy of making
    museums
    > more spectacular and more "american", a policy which should be
    > welcome, if it will mean "easier to read" museums, with
    multilingual
    > information boards, and maybe even that museums will be open in the
    > afternoon!
    >
    > I have never been in America, so I do not know how an American
    museum looks
    > like.
    >
    > It is widely claimed in Italy that yes, Italian museums are getting
    more
    > American.
    >
    > What I know is that our museums are getting worse. Childish
    explanation,
    > comics, large useless boards filled with sillynesses.
    >
    > "Slyppery surface", "mind the gap", "mind your head" boars every
    where;
    > shops selling useless ugly toys: that's what we in more American
    museum.
    >
    > At the same time, less objects on display.
    >
    >
    >
    > But this does not mean that the attitude to Cultus Deorum has
    changed
    > in any way.
    > What the majority of Italians would think of it if they had ever
    > heard about it, is that its followers must be satanists or mental
    > patients.
    >
    >
    >
    > Obviously few Italians ever heard about Cultus Deorum.
    >
    > But no, that idea is not linked with Satanism, and it wouldn't.
    Rome, in
    > Italy, is at the same time our history and..."ourselves".
    >
    > Even the Church is...Roman!
    >
    > Mental patients, yeah...maybe..more probably simply dreamers.
    >
    > The biggest organization that tries to revive religio
    > Romana in Italy (and the only one in Rome) is still the MTR
    > (Movimento Tradizionale Romano), a barely disguised neofascist
    > organization.
    >
    >
    >
    > I perfectly know MTR, I regularly read their papers, I know first
    hand many
    > members and, to give an example, two hours ago I received an sms
    about Dies
    > Natalis Solis by one of the chairmans. I sometimes participate in
    their
    > activities.
    >
    > BARELY DISGUISED NEOFASCIST ORGANIZATION.
    >
    > My Englisg is poor, but I understand that you are stating that MTR
    is made
    > by fascists that try to disguise, to cover , the fact that they are
    > fascists. Moreover, the word "barely" gives the idea that they
    would like to
    > hide better than they can do.
    >
    > Sorry, Plauta. MTR is not a fascist or neofascist organizations.
    >
    > I have no idea if people in America is able or apt to understand
    what
    > Fascism was: I think it is impossible for you, but it is only an
    opinion.
    >
    > Well, we have to choose one: either you don't know what Fascism
    really is;
    > or you do not know what MTR is. Tertium non datur.
    >
    > Moreover, "neofascist" is surely derogatory in Italian, I suppose
    it be
    > derogatory in English too. Let's avoid derogatory words.
    >
    > Yes, I understand you would call fascists some of them. I can even
    admit
    > that some of them would not dislike some specific aspects of
    Fascism. So
    > what?
    >
    > This is not enough for calling an organization FASCIST. Most of all
    if the
    > intention is to offend.
    >
    > Anyway, you know, I don't want to be impolite towards people in the
    Usa, but
    > if criticism of Italian history and Italian culture comes from the
    > USA..well...we find it a bit difficult to accept lessons.
    >
    > We might discuss what Fascism did for the renaissasnce of Roman
    culture and
    > civilization in Italy. And I am speaking of diggings, opening of
    museum
    > (without multilingual boards), money spent in creating universities
    and so
    > on. And they did something of paramount importance. Unrivalled
    until today,
    > like it or not.
    >
    > I think it would be best to avoid "philosophical" discussion. I
    don't mind,
    > though..
    >
    > Or you could give us some hints stating what aspects of MTR are
    fascist.
    > That would be to me of great interest.
    >
    >
    >
    > Reverenter
    >
    >
    >
    > Gallus Solaris Alexander
    >
    > Bononiae
    >
    > ITALIA!
    >
    Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60050 From: Gnaeus Iulius Caesar Date: 2008-12-20
    Subject: R: [Nova-Roma] Re: Edictum Praetorium Curiatio-Iulio de Iurisdiction
    Cn. Iulius Caesar Cn. Cornelio Lentulo sal.

    In respect of this edict, Section VI. Iudicium contains elements that
    are unconstitutional. section 3.c creates an offence of contempt for
    the Reus. That is the perogative of the comitia to do so, not a
    magistrate in an edict. Clearly this usurps the chain of authority
    laid out in Section 1.B of the Constitution. This edict creates law,
    whereas the right of iurisprudentia should be limited to filling in
    the blanks on what already exists. Section VI.3 contains again a
    power to fine, which is a gross assault again of the right of the
    comitia to create law. Again this is unconstitutional.

    Sections VI.3.a-c of the edict run contrary to the provisions of the
    Lex Salicia iudiciaria. It is this lex that creates the judicial
    process in Nova Roma, and it states in its PREFATIO "The intent of
    this law is to establish a judicial system in Nova Roma, setting the
    legal procedures that must be followed to present a case to a court
    and to constitute that court." An edict can never overrule a lex -
    vis a vis Section 1.B of the Constitution, for it is a lesser
    authority. The PREFATIO above clearly lays out that what is contained
    in the Lex Salicia iudiciaria is the model to be followed, not the
    model with bits added on by two praetors. The law is the law is the
    law. They cannot alter the framework for trials for to do so strikes
    at the heart of the chain of legal authority stated in the
    Constitution (Section 1.B). If changes in the trial process are
    required, it should be put to the people in comitia in the form of a
    lex.

    Section VI.4.3 of the edict removes the right to litigate for ever -
    which this edict cannot do as that conflicts with Section 3.1.1.3 of
    the Lex Salicia poenalis which states that a citizen has "The rights
    to bring actions under leges poenales and to give evidence therein.
    The right to bring actions under leges poenales may not be impaired
    or abrogated by conviction except by exactio for life." Nothing can
    restrict a citizen from mounting an action at law, unless it is over
    the time limitation of 5 years as stipulated in that lex. Nothing
    else can affect that right at law, least of all the lesser authority
    of an edict.

    Section VI.4.C of the edict also contains an element that conflicts
    with the Lex Salicia iudiciaria and the Lex Salicia poenalis. It does
    so in respect of the former for the reasons above - the edict
    assaults the authority of the people in comitia to include a
    provision that fundamentally changes the nature of trials in Nova
    Roma. Now the Reus (defendant) will be required to defend himself,
    rather than just the Actor (accuser) prove his or her case.
    Essentially the right to silence has been removed from a defendant.
    This is utterly outrageous. It conflicts with Section 3.1.1.4 of the
    Lex Salicia poenalis because this enshrines "The right to fair trial
    by law for offence". Clearly the removal of the right to silence and
    forcing someone to offer a defense rather than sit and wait for the
    Actor to prove the case is a total assault on this right.

    There other a few other points regarding this edict, but suffice it
    to say it gives magistrates excessive power over citizens, is
    unconstitutional and conflicts with the higher authority of leges.

    It is a pernicious document that can be put to great ill use by
    persons so minded.

    As to your comments, of course the prateors can use this right of
    iurisprudentia to create offences out of thin air, and punishments to
    boot. They already have done so during the show trials. Additionally
    I haven't misread anything, least of all the law. I am aware, fully,
    that the description of iurisprudentia is a straight copy from the
    lex. That isn't the issue.

    What is the issue to my mind is that this section, by placing the
    quote on iurisprudentia clearly in the section of the edict on crimes
    and penalties indicates to me that the intention is to use
    iurisprudentia to fill in the gaps in our legislation, and not by way
    of simply slightly extending existing laws to cover highly unusual
    circumstances, but by way of plucking out of thin air new crimes and
    punishments (as was already done this year), instead of promulgating
    law in the normal way in the comitia.

    This no doubt is all in aid of efficiency, and compelling the
    citizens to obediance as you noted in a post I think on the Back
    Alley. This is still a volunteer organization despite all the
    delusions to the contrary, this edict assists in taking us further
    from a place of volunteers to a place of compulsion and one where
    citizens find themselves "compelled" to do "x", "y" or "z". That in a
    volunteeer group usually ends one way, people leave. But then since
    they don't share the "vision" I am sure that adherents of this shift
    in mentality in Nova Roma wouldn't shed any tears over their passing.

    This edict serves only to demonstrate that some of you have a total
    disconnect from reality and a complete lack of understanding about
    how to run volunteer based groups. That we have sunk to the level of
    breaking our own constitution with impunity simply because it
    isn't "Roman" enough - despite it being our highest legal authority,
    igmoring rights granted by the people/members in laws (here in thsi
    edict and in the trials), and now bolstering up the lurch
    to "compulsion" rather than debate, and acceptance of disagreement,
    in this edict - this is a telling sign where some of you want to take
    Nova Roma.

    Your vision of a society/community of volunteers being ordered and
    compelled around like cattle, isn't one I share.

    Vale.


    --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Cn. Cornelius Lentulus"
    <cn_corn_lent@...> wrote:
    >
    > Cn. Lentulus Cn. Caesari s. p. d.
    >
    >
    > In a peaceful and respectable way, please let me argue against your
    opinion, Cn. Caesar.
    >
    >
    > >>> Either this edict is the most useless one ever produced,
    repeating as
    > it does sections of the constitution and laws, or, it is a
    pernicious
    > one. <<<
    >
    Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60051 From: Cn. Cornelius Lentulus Date: 2008-12-20
    Subject: R: [Nova-Roma] Re: Edictum Praetorium Curiatio-Iulio de Iurisdiction
    Cn. Lentulus Cn. Caesari sal.


    Thank you for your answer and comments. You have made some very good observations that avoided my attention. You might consider to join the team of next year's praetores and help them to work out a perfect edictum perpetuum.

    Vale!

    Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60052 From: Gnaeus Iulius Caesar Date: 2008-12-20
    Subject: Re: R: [Nova-Roma] Re: Edictum Praetorium Curiatio-Iulio de Iurisdic
    Cn. Iulius Caesar Cn. Cornelio Lentulo sal.

    I fear I must decline your suggestion, since firstly I think it inappropriate one curule magistrate serve on the team of another, albeit higher in the cursus. Secondly of course, given my views on the shift in attitude from volunteer to compulsion I think I would prefer to insert red hot needles under my fingernails, than provide the mechanism for a more "perfect" set of trials.
     
    Vale bene
     
    Sent: Saturday, December 20, 2008 6:36 PM
    Subject: R: [Nova-Roma] Re: Edictum Praetorium Curiatio-Iulio de Iurisdictione Praetoris - Responsum Fl.GA

    Cn. Lentulus Cn. Caesari sal.


    Thank you for your answer and comments. You have made some very good observations that avoided my attention. You might consider to join the team of next year's praetores and help them to work out a perfect edictum perpetuum.

    Vale!

    Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60053 From: Q. Valerius Poplicola Date: 2008-12-20
    Subject: R: [Nova-Roma] Re: Revival of gladiatorial tuornaments in Rome
    Poplicola Alexandro sal.

    Hoc dico ut scias: Plauta est Italiana quae iam Pannoniam incolit.

    bene uale.

    --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Libero" <sa-mann@...> wrote:
    >
    >
    >
    > Spectata Livia Plauta,
    >
    >
    >
    > I hope you won't mind letting me give a few information "first
    hand", given
    > that I am Italian.
    >
    > _____
    >
    >
    >
    >
    > There has been a shift in the way italian public opinion considers
    > ancient Rome, because it seems that finally enough time has passed
    > for it to lose its psychological association with fascism.
    >
    >
    >
    > Nobody in Italy have seen Rome psychologically associated with
    Fascism for
    > the last 40 years, at least.
    >
    > Well, if not nobody, just very very few associated Rome and Fascism
    after
    > World War II. The vast majority thought that the love for Rome
    fascists had,
    > was abusive. No shifts, then.
    >
    >
    >
    > Initiatives like this fit into Berlusconi's policy of making museums
    > more spectacular and more "american", a policy which should be
    > welcome, if it will mean "easier to read" museums, with multilingual
    > information boards, and maybe even that museums will be open in the
    > afternoon!
    >
    > I have never been in America, so I do not know how an American
    museum looks
    > like.
    >
    > It is widely claimed in Italy that yes, Italian museums are getting more
    > American.
    >
    > What I know is that our museums are getting worse. Childish explanation,
    > comics, large useless boards filled with sillynesses.
    >
    > "Slyppery surface", "mind the gap", "mind your head" boars every where;
    > shops selling useless ugly toys: that's what we in more American museum.
    >
    > At the same time, less objects on display.
    >
    >
    >
    > But this does not mean that the attitude to Cultus Deorum has changed
    > in any way.
    > What the majority of Italians would think of it if they had ever
    > heard about it, is that its followers must be satanists or mental
    > patients.
    >
    >
    >
    > Obviously few Italians ever heard about Cultus Deorum.
    >
    > But no, that idea is not linked with Satanism, and it wouldn't. Rome, in
    > Italy, is at the same time our history and..."ourselves".
    >
    > Even the Church is...Roman!
    >
    > Mental patients, yeah...maybe..more probably simply dreamers.
    >
    > The biggest organization that tries to revive religio
    > Romana in Italy (and the only one in Rome) is still the MTR
    > (Movimento Tradizionale Romano), a barely disguised neofascist
    > organization.
    >
    >
    >
    > I perfectly know MTR, I regularly read their papers, I know first
    hand many
    > members and, to give an example, two hours ago I received an sms
    about Dies
    > Natalis Solis by one of the chairmans. I sometimes participate in their
    > activities.
    >
    > BARELY DISGUISED NEOFASCIST ORGANIZATION.
    >
    > My Englisg is poor, but I understand that you are stating that MTR
    is made
    > by fascists that try to disguise, to cover , the fact that they are
    > fascists. Moreover, the word "barely" gives the idea that they would
    like to
    > hide better than they can do.
    >
    > Sorry, Plauta. MTR is not a fascist or neofascist organizations.
    >
    > I have no idea if people in America is able or apt to understand what
    > Fascism was: I think it is impossible for you, but it is only an
    opinion.
    >
    > Well, we have to choose one: either you don't know what Fascism
    really is;
    > or you do not know what MTR is. Tertium non datur.
    >
    > Moreover, "neofascist" is surely derogatory in Italian, I suppose it be
    > derogatory in English too. Let's avoid derogatory words.
    >
    > Yes, I understand you would call fascists some of them. I can even admit
    > that some of them would not dislike some specific aspects of Fascism. So
    > what?
    >
    > This is not enough for calling an organization FASCIST. Most of all
    if the
    > intention is to offend.
    >
    > Anyway, you know, I don't want to be impolite towards people in the
    Usa, but
    > if criticism of Italian history and Italian culture comes from the
    > USA..well...we find it a bit difficult to accept lessons.
    >
    > We might discuss what Fascism did for the renaissasnce of Roman
    culture and
    > civilization in Italy. And I am speaking of diggings, opening of museum
    > (without multilingual boards), money spent in creating universities
    and so
    > on. And they did something of paramount importance. Unrivalled until
    today,
    > like it or not.
    >
    > I think it would be best to avoid "philosophical" discussion. I
    don't mind,
    > though..
    >
    > Or you could give us some hints stating what aspects of MTR are fascist.
    > That would be to me of great interest.
    >
    >
    >
    > Reverenter
    >
    >
    >
    > Gallus Solaris Alexander
    >
    > Bononiae
    >
    > ITALIA!
    >
    Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60054 From: Stefn Ullerius Venator Piperbarbus Date: 2008-12-21
    Subject: Carts and Horses...
    Avete omnes;

    I have been a member of the Senate for a short while and a Cives Nova
    Roma for most of our history.
    I have been called, by many, a good Roman; kind of ironic for one who
    is a Germanic Pagan, who should be a sworn enemy of all things Roman.
    I have justified my presence by stating my love of ancestry, including
    those who were, most certainly, Cives Roma Antiqua.
    I have declared, in times of factional flareup, that I am a party of
    one; my polity and policy is the growth of our Res Publica.

    I do not need Nova Roma; Heathenry supplies me with a larger
    community, which is in accord with the Worship I give.
    I do not need Nova Roma; Heathenry supplies me with a worldview and
    ethos, which is in accord with the Beliefs I have.
    I do not need Nova Roma; Heathenry supplies me with a sensibility and
    comfort, which is in accord with the Faith I feel.
    I do not need Nova Roma; Heathenry supplies me with a fullness of
    heart, which is accord with the way my parents taught me to live.

    I do, however, WANT Nova Roma.

    My acceptance of the seat in the Senate, and my service in elective
    office (6 years out of just over 10 in our history) should be a small
    indication of my idealism hereabouts.

    My illnesses have heretofore interfered with my thinking and
    commentary, I will admit; no more.

    As I have written before, Nova Roma has an overall population worthy
    of a healthy village, which is spread across more time zones than I
    have fingers and toes.

    What the hell are we doing???

    Right now, we are a voluntary association of (at least partially)
    like-minded individuals. This is who we are.

    What we are (historically) trying to do is bring the BEST of the
    middle Republic back to life in this modern world. From having
    observed, as a Citizen and Iudice, our "court system," I am astounded
    that such has run, in my view, amok; NO best there.

    When will we come to our senses and build a good cart, before we start
    breeding horses??? Or, when will we train a good pack horse before we
    get into full-blown cargo carriage???

    I support our Constitution, fewer Laws and more Justice.

    I support a Land Fund, as we should have a center where Cives can
    visit and our Senate and other Magistrates can meet, where ever in the
    world such might be feasible. Colonia; those should be undertaken by
    groups of Cives within the bounds of their Macronational borders.
    Intentional communities can work.

    I support a scholarship fund, as sound research will lead to discovery
    of more and better knowledge. As an adjunct to this, I would support
    Nova Roma gaining access to research data bases for use by our
    citizens.

    Other projects...well, if they do not bring gain to the central
    mission of establishing Our Res Publica, then I am for reduced or
    nonexistent funding; individual cults should be supported by their
    adherents.

    We MUST bring the focus on re-establishing, re-invigorating Republic,
    Religio and Romanitas - nothing else, nothing less.

    A few sesterces...

    =========================================
    In amicitia quod fides -
    Stephanus Ullerius Venator Piperbarbus
    Civis
    --
    May the Holy Powers smile on our efforts.
    May the Spirits of our family lines nod in approval.
    May we be of Worth to our fellow Nova Romans.
    Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60055 From: Robert Levee Date: 2008-12-21
    Subject: Re: R: [Nova-Roma] Re: Revival of gladiatorial tuornaments in Rome
    Ap.Galerius Aurelianus L.Livia Plauta S.P.D.

    I must agree with you.If it walks like a duck and looks like a duck.....
    Besides the facist salute is a dead giveaway.

    Io Saturnalia
    Ap.Galerius Aurelianus


    --- On Sat, 12/20/08, Lucia Livia Plauta <cases@...> wrote:

    > From: Lucia Livia Plauta <cases@...>
    > Subject: R: [Nova-Roma] Re: Revival of gladiatorial tuornaments in Rome
    > To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
    > Date: Saturday, December 20, 2008, 7:13 PM
    > L. Livia Plauta Gallo Solari Alexandro S,P.D.
    >
    > (English translation follows)
    > Caro Alexander, si vede che non frequenti molto la lista
    > italiana di
    > NR (Pomerium), se mi prendi per americana.
    > Purtroppo so di quello che parlo, infatti appena ho
    > raccontato a
    > parenti a amici di essermi unita a Nova Roma, la prima
    > domanda di
    > tutti è stata: "ma non sono fascisti?"
    >
    > Forse sei molto giovane, oppure frequenti gente priva di
    > coscienza
    > storica, tutte ragioni per cui potresti non esserti accorto
    > che nella
    > mente di molta gente Roma e il fascismo sono ancora
    > indissolubilmente
    > legati.
    >
    > Per quanto riguarda l'"americanizzazione" dei
    > musei capisco le tue
    > preoccupazioni, e queste cose danno fastidio anche a me,
    > sono però un
    > piccolo prezzo da pagare se poi ci sono anche ricostruzioni
    > virtuali,
    > pannelli esplicativi in varie lingue, ecc.
    >
    > Per quanto riguarda il MTR, se non vuoi chiamarli
    > neofascisti, li
    > chiamerò criptofascisti.
    > Adesso è molto di moda riproporre le ideologie fasciste
    > pur negando
    > di essere fascisti. Io però, come sanno quelli che mi
    > conoscono, sono
    > una che chiama le cose con il loro nome, quindi quelli li
    > chiamo
    > fascisti, fascisti, fascisti.
    >
    > Ho avuto occasione di vedere parecchi di loro il 21 aprile
    > scorso a
    > Roma, durante una visita dei fori da loro organizzata. Li
    > ho visti in
    > faccia, li ho sentiti parlare, e ti assicuro che io i
    > fascisti li so
    > riconoscere. Per non parlare del loro modo di fare
    > l'osculatio, che
    > finisce in saluto fascista ...
    >
    > Ah, visto che sei di Bononia, salutami Marullinus, che ho
    > avuto
    > occasione di incontrare molto meno di quanto sperassi.
    >
    >
    > Dear Alexander, it shows that you are not very present on
    > the italian
    > NR list (Pomerium), if you think I'm american.
    > Unfortunately I know what I'm talking about. In fact,
    > when I told
    > relatives and friends that I joined Nova Roma, their first
    > question
    > was invariably: "but aren't they fascists?"
    >
    > Maybe you are very young, or you only have friends without
    >
    > historical conscience, so you might not have realized that
    > in the
    > minds of many people ancient Rome is still stronlgy linked
    > with
    > fascism.
    >
    > I understand your worries about the
    > "americanization" of museums, and
    > these things disturb me as well, but they are a small price
    > to pay,
    > if there are also virtual reconstructions, multilingual
    > panels, etc.
    >
    > As to MTR, if you don't want to call them neofascists,
    > I'll call them
    > cryptofascists.
    > Nowadays it's very fashionable to repropose fascist
    > ideologies, even
    > while negating being fascist. But, as the people who know
    > me know, I
    > call things with their name, so I call those people
    > fascists,
    > fascists, fascists.
    >
    > I have had the chance to meet a lot of them last April 21
    > in Rome,
    > during a visit of the Imperial fora they organized. I saw
    > their
    > faces, I heard them talk, and I assure you that I can
    > recognize
    > fascists. Not to talk about their way of doing osculatio,
    > ending with
    > a fascist salute ...
    >
    > Ah, and since you are from Bononia, please say hello for me
    > to
    > Marullinus, whom I had the chance to meet less times than I
    > wished.
    >
    > Optime vale,
    > Livia
    > >
    > >
    > > Spectata Livia Plauta,
    > >
    > >
    > >
    > > I hope you won't mind letting me give a few
    > information "first
    > hand", given
    > > that I am Italian.
    > >
    > > _____
    > >
    > >
    > >
    > >
    > > There has been a shift in the way italian public
    > opinion considers
    > > ancient Rome, because it seems that finally enough
    > time has passed
    > > for it to lose its psychological association with
    > fascism.
    > >
    > >
    > >
    > > Nobody in Italy have seen Rome psychologically
    > associated with
    > Fascism for
    > > the last 40 years, at least.
    > >
    > > Well, if not nobody, just very very few associated
    > Rome and Fascism
    > after
    > > World War II. The vast majority thought that the love
    > for Rome
    > fascists had,
    > > was abusive. No shifts, then.
    > >
    > >
    > >
    > > Initiatives like this fit into Berlusconi's policy
    > of making
    > museums
    > > more spectacular and more "american", a
    > policy which should be
    > > welcome, if it will mean "easier to read"
    > museums, with
    > multilingual
    > > information boards, and maybe even that museums will
    > be open in the
    > > afternoon!
    > >
    > > I have never been in America, so I do not know how an
    > American
    > museum looks
    > > like.
    > >
    > > It is widely claimed in Italy that yes, Italian
    > museums are getting
    > more
    > > American.
    > >
    > > What I know is that our museums are getting worse.
    > Childish
    > explanation,
    > > comics, large useless boards filled with sillynesses.
    > >
    > > "Slyppery surface", "mind the
    > gap", "mind your head" boars every
    > where;
    > > shops selling useless ugly toys: that's what we in
    > more American
    > museum.
    > >
    > > At the same time, less objects on display.
    > >
    > >
    > >
    > > But this does not mean that the attitude to Cultus
    > Deorum has
    > changed
    > > in any way.
    > > What the majority of Italians would think of it if
    > they had ever
    > > heard about it, is that its followers must be
    > satanists or mental
    > > patients.
    > >
    > >
    > >
    > > Obviously few Italians ever heard about Cultus
    > Deorum.
    > >
    > > But no, that idea is not linked with Satanism, and it
    > wouldn't.
    > Rome, in
    > > Italy, is at the same time our history
    > and..."ourselves".
    > >
    > > Even the Church is...Roman!
    > >
    > > Mental patients, yeah...maybe..more probably simply
    > dreamers.
    > >
    > > The biggest organization that tries to revive religio
    >
    > > Romana in Italy (and the only one in Rome) is still
    > the MTR
    > > (Movimento Tradizionale Romano), a barely disguised
    > neofascist
    > > organization.
    > >
    > >
    > >
    > > I perfectly know MTR, I regularly read their papers, I
    > know first
    > hand many
    > > members and, to give an example, two hours ago I
    > received an sms
    > about Dies
    > > Natalis Solis by one of the chairmans. I sometimes
    > participate in
    > their
    > > activities.
    > >
    > > BARELY DISGUISED NEOFASCIST ORGANIZATION.
    > >
    > > My Englisg is poor, but I understand that you are
    > stating that MTR
    > is made
    > > by fascists that try to disguise, to cover , the fact
    > that they are
    > > fascists. Moreover, the word "barely" gives
    > the idea that they
    > would like to
    > > hide better than they can do.
    > >
    > > Sorry, Plauta. MTR is not a fascist or neofascist
    > organizations.
    > >
    > > I have no idea if people in America is able or apt to
    > understand
    > what
    > > Fascism was: I think it is impossible for you, but it
    > is only an
    > opinion.
    > >
    > > Well, we have to choose one: either you don't know
    > what Fascism
    > really is;
    > > or you do not know what MTR is. Tertium non datur.
    > >
    > > Moreover, "neofascist" is surely derogatory
    > in Italian, I suppose
    > it be
    > > derogatory in English too. Let's avoid derogatory
    > words.
    > >
    > > Yes, I understand you would call fascists some of
    > them. I can even
    > admit
    > > that some of them would not dislike some specific
    > aspects of
    > Fascism. So
    > > what?
    > >
    > > This is not enough for calling an organization
    > FASCIST. Most of all
    > if the
    > > intention is to offend.
    > >
    > > Anyway, you know, I don't want to be impolite
    > towards people in the
    > Usa, but
    > > if criticism of Italian history and Italian culture
    > comes from the
    > > USA..well...we find it a bit difficult to accept
    > lessons.
    > >
    > > We might discuss what Fascism did for the renaissasnce
    > of Roman
    > culture and
    > > civilization in Italy. And I am speaking of diggings,
    > opening of
    > museum
    > > (without multilingual boards), money spent in creating
    > universities
    > and so
    > > on. And they did something of paramount importance.
    > Unrivalled
    > until today,
    > > like it or not.
    > >
    > > I think it would be best to avoid
    > "philosophical" discussion. I
    > don't mind,
    > > though..
    > >
    > > Or you could give us some hints stating what aspects
    > of MTR are
    > fascist.
    > > That would be to me of great interest.
    > >
    > >
    > >
    > > Reverenter
    > >
    > >
    > >
    > > Gallus Solaris Alexander
    > >
    > > Bononiae
    > >
    > > ITALIA!
    > >
    Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60056 From: Q. Valerius Poplicola Date: 2008-12-21
    Subject: R: [Nova-Roma] Re: Revival of gladiatorial tuornaments in Rome
    Even the British HBO series "Rome" uses the salute as a normal Roman
    salute. Using the salute in no way makes it "fascist".

    QVP

    --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Robert Levee <galerius_of_rome@...>
    wrote:
    >
    > Ap.Galerius Aurelianus L.Livia Plauta S.P.D.
    >
    > I must agree with you.If it walks like a duck and looks like a duck.....
    > Besides the facist salute is a dead giveaway.
    >
    > Io Saturnalia
    > Ap.Galerius Aurelianus
    >
    >
    > --- On Sat, 12/20/08, Lucia Livia Plauta <cases@...> wrote:
    >
    > > From: Lucia Livia Plauta <cases@...>
    > > Subject: R: [Nova-Roma] Re: Revival of gladiatorial tuornaments in
    Rome
    > > To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
    > > Date: Saturday, December 20, 2008, 7:13 PM
    > > L. Livia Plauta Gallo Solari Alexandro S,P.D.
    > >
    > > (English translation follows)
    > > Caro Alexander, si vede che non frequenti molto la lista
    > > italiana di
    > > NR (Pomerium), se mi prendi per americana.
    > > Purtroppo so di quello che parlo, infatti appena ho
    > > raccontato a
    > > parenti a amici di essermi unita a Nova Roma, la prima
    > > domanda di
    > > tutti è stata: "ma non sono fascisti?"
    > >
    > > Forse sei molto giovane, oppure frequenti gente priva di
    > > coscienza
    > > storica, tutte ragioni per cui potresti non esserti accorto
    > > che nella
    > > mente di molta gente Roma e il fascismo sono ancora
    > > indissolubilmente
    > > legati.
    > >
    > > Per quanto riguarda l'"americanizzazione" dei
    > > musei capisco le tue
    > > preoccupazioni, e queste cose danno fastidio anche a me,
    > > sono però un
    > > piccolo prezzo da pagare se poi ci sono anche ricostruzioni
    > > virtuali,
    > > pannelli esplicativi in varie lingue, ecc.
    > >
    > > Per quanto riguarda il MTR, se non vuoi chiamarli
    > > neofascisti, li
    > > chiamerò criptofascisti.
    > > Adesso è molto di moda riproporre le ideologie fasciste
    > > pur negando
    > > di essere fascisti. Io però, come sanno quelli che mi
    > > conoscono, sono
    > > una che chiama le cose con il loro nome, quindi quelli li
    > > chiamo
    > > fascisti, fascisti, fascisti.
    > >
    > > Ho avuto occasione di vedere parecchi di loro il 21 aprile
    > > scorso a
    > > Roma, durante una visita dei fori da loro organizzata. Li
    > > ho visti in
    > > faccia, li ho sentiti parlare, e ti assicuro che io i
    > > fascisti li so
    > > riconoscere. Per non parlare del loro modo di fare
    > > l'osculatio, che
    > > finisce in saluto fascista ...
    > >
    > > Ah, visto che sei di Bononia, salutami Marullinus, che ho
    > > avuto
    > > occasione di incontrare molto meno di quanto sperassi.
    > >
    > >
    > > Dear Alexander, it shows that you are not very present on
    > > the italian
    > > NR list (Pomerium), if you think I'm american.
    > > Unfortunately I know what I'm talking about. In fact,
    > > when I told
    > > relatives and friends that I joined Nova Roma, their first
    > > question
    > > was invariably: "but aren't they fascists?"
    > >
    > > Maybe you are very young, or you only have friends without
    > >
    > > historical conscience, so you might not have realized that
    > > in the
    > > minds of many people ancient Rome is still stronlgy linked
    > > with
    > > fascism.
    > >
    > > I understand your worries about the
    > > "americanization" of museums, and
    > > these things disturb me as well, but they are a small price
    > > to pay,
    > > if there are also virtual reconstructions, multilingual
    > > panels, etc.
    > >
    > > As to MTR, if you don't want to call them neofascists,
    > > I'll call them
    > > cryptofascists.
    > > Nowadays it's very fashionable to repropose fascist
    > > ideologies, even
    > > while negating being fascist. But, as the people who know
    > > me know, I
    > > call things with their name, so I call those people
    > > fascists,
    > > fascists, fascists.
    > >
    > > I have had the chance to meet a lot of them last April 21
    > > in Rome,
    > > during a visit of the Imperial fora they organized. I saw
    > > their
    > > faces, I heard them talk, and I assure you that I can
    > > recognize
    > > fascists. Not to talk about their way of doing osculatio,
    > > ending with
    > > a fascist salute ...
    > >
    > > Ah, and since you are from Bononia, please say hello for me
    > > to
    > > Marullinus, whom I had the chance to meet less times than I
    > > wished.
    > >
    > > Optime vale,
    > > Livia
    > > >
    > > >
    > > > Spectata Livia Plauta,
    > > >
    > > >
    > > >
    > > > I hope you won't mind letting me give a few
    > > information "first
    > > hand", given
    > > > that I am Italian.
    > > >
    > > > _____
    > > >
    > > >
    > > >
    > > >
    > > > There has been a shift in the way italian public
    > > opinion considers
    > > > ancient Rome, because it seems that finally enough
    > > time has passed
    > > > for it to lose its psychological association with
    > > fascism.
    > > >
    > > >
    > > >
    > > > Nobody in Italy have seen Rome psychologically
    > > associated with
    > > Fascism for
    > > > the last 40 years, at least.
    > > >
    > > > Well, if not nobody, just very very few associated
    > > Rome and Fascism
    > > after
    > > > World War II. The vast majority thought that the love
    > > for Rome
    > > fascists had,
    > > > was abusive. No shifts, then.
    > > >
    > > >
    > > >
    > > > Initiatives like this fit into Berlusconi's policy
    > > of making
    > > museums
    > > > more spectacular and more "american", a
    > > policy which should be
    > > > welcome, if it will mean "easier to read"
    > > museums, with
    > > multilingual
    > > > information boards, and maybe even that museums will
    > > be open in the
    > > > afternoon!
    > > >
    > > > I have never been in America, so I do not know how an
    > > American
    > > museum looks
    > > > like.
    > > >
    > > > It is widely claimed in Italy that yes, Italian
    > > museums are getting
    > > more
    > > > American.
    > > >
    > > > What I know is that our museums are getting worse.
    > > Childish
    > > explanation,
    > > > comics, large useless boards filled with sillynesses.
    > > >
    > > > "Slyppery surface", "mind the
    > > gap", "mind your head" boars every
    > > where;
    > > > shops selling useless ugly toys: that's what we in
    > > more American
    > > museum.
    > > >
    > > > At the same time, less objects on display.
    > > >
    > > >
    > > >
    > > > But this does not mean that the attitude to Cultus
    > > Deorum has
    > > changed
    > > > in any way.
    > > > What the majority of Italians would think of it if
    > > they had ever
    > > > heard about it, is that its followers must be
    > > satanists or mental
    > > > patients.
    > > >
    > > >
    > > >
    > > > Obviously few Italians ever heard about Cultus
    > > Deorum.
    > > >
    > > > But no, that idea is not linked with Satanism, and it
    > > wouldn't.
    > > Rome, in
    > > > Italy, is at the same time our history
    > > and..."ourselves".
    > > >
    > > > Even the Church is...Roman!
    > > >
    > > > Mental patients, yeah...maybe..more probably simply
    > > dreamers.
    > > >
    > > > The biggest organization that tries to revive religio
    > >
    > > > Romana in Italy (and the only one in Rome) is still
    > > the MTR
    > > > (Movimento Tradizionale Romano), a barely disguised
    > > neofascist
    > > > organization.
    > > >
    > > >
    > > >
    > > > I perfectly know MTR, I regularly read their papers, I
    > > know first
    > > hand many
    > > > members and, to give an example, two hours ago I
    > > received an sms
    > > about Dies
    > > > Natalis Solis by one of the chairmans. I sometimes
    > > participate in
    > > their
    > > > activities.
    > > >
    > > > BARELY DISGUISED NEOFASCIST ORGANIZATION.
    > > >
    > > > My Englisg is poor, but I understand that you are
    > > stating that MTR
    > > is made
    > > > by fascists that try to disguise, to cover , the fact
    > > that they are
    > > > fascists. Moreover, the word "barely" gives
    > > the idea that they
    > > would like to
    > > > hide better than they can do.
    > > >
    > > > Sorry, Plauta. MTR is not a fascist or neofascist
    > > organizations.
    > > >
    > > > I have no idea if people in America is able or apt to
    > > understand
    > > what
    > > > Fascism was: I think it is impossible for you, but it
    > > is only an
    > > opinion.
    > > >
    > > > Well, we have to choose one: either you don't know
    > > what Fascism
    > > really is;
    > > > or you do not know what MTR is. Tertium non datur.
    > > >
    > > > Moreover, "neofascist" is surely derogatory
    > > in Italian, I suppose
    > > it be
    > > > derogatory in English too. Let's avoid derogatory
    > > words.
    > > >
    > > > Yes, I understand you would call fascists some of
    > > them. I can even
    > > admit
    > > > that some of them would not dislike some specific
    > > aspects of
    > > Fascism. So
    > > > what?
    > > >
    > > > This is not enough for calling an organization
    > > FASCIST. Most of all
    > > if the
    > > > intention is to offend.
    > > >
    > > > Anyway, you know, I don't want to be impolite
    > > towards people in the
    > > Usa, but
    > > > if criticism of Italian history and Italian culture
    > > comes from the
    > > > USA..well...we find it a bit difficult to accept
    > > lessons.
    > > >
    > > > We might discuss what Fascism did for the renaissasnce
    > > of Roman
    > > culture and
    > > > civilization in Italy. And I am speaking of diggings,
    > > opening of
    > > museum
    > > > (without multilingual boards), money spent in creating
    > > universities
    > > and so
    > > > on. And they did something of paramount importance.
    > > Unrivalled
    > > until today,
    > > > like it or not.
    > > >
    > > > I think it would be best to avoid
    > > "philosophical" discussion. I
    > > don't mind,
    > > > though..
    > > >
    > > > Or you could give us some hints stating what aspects
    > > of MTR are
    > > fascist.
    > > > That would be to me of great interest.
    > > >
    > > >
    > > >
    > > > Reverenter
    > > >
    > > >
    > > >
    > > > Gallus Solaris Alexander
    > > >
    > > > Bononiae
    > > >
    > > > ITALIA!
    > > >
    >
    Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60057 From: Robert Levee Date: 2008-12-21
    Subject: Re: R: [Nova-Roma] Re: Revival of gladiatorial tuornaments in Rome
    Salve et salvete,

    So then in your opinion this is just a throwback to a normal Roman custom, to use that salute.Perhaps I am a little faciophobic.After the events of WWII, I seem to have a hard time understanding how certain segments of cerrent era group,s would care to be associated with such a symbol of modern day tyrany and genocide, irregardless of the fact it was a practice of Roma Antigua.Slavery was also an acceptable practice then, but I would hardly think that the majority of reasonable people today would accept that practice, or vomitarianism either.I'm sure we could even debate the pros and cons of those, but it is not what I intended when this conversation began.I only stated my opinion on such matters and did not intend to insult the sensibilities, of anyone facist or not.Bear in mind once again it is only an opinion of mine, erroneous or not.

    Io Saturnalia
    Ap.Galerius Aurelianus






    --- On Sun, 12/21/08, Q. Valerius Poplicola <catullus.poeta@...> wrote:

    > From: Q. Valerius Poplicola <catullus.poeta@...>
    > Subject: R: [Nova-Roma] Re: Revival of gladiatorial tuornaments in Rome
    > To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
    > Date: Sunday, December 21, 2008, 2:50 AM
    > Even the British HBO series "Rome" uses the salute
    > as a normal Roman
    > salute. Using the salute in no way makes it
    > "fascist".
    >
    > QVP
    >
    > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Robert Levee
    > <galerius_of_rome@...>
    > wrote:
    > >
    > > Ap.Galerius Aurelianus L.Livia Plauta S.P.D.
    > >
    > > I must agree with you.If it walks like a duck and
    > looks like a duck.....
    > > Besides the facist salute is a dead giveaway.
    > >
    > > Io Saturnalia
    > > Ap.Galerius Aurelianus
    > >
    > >
    > > --- On Sat, 12/20/08, Lucia Livia Plauta
    > <cases@...> wrote:
    > >
    > > > From: Lucia Livia Plauta <cases@...>
    > > > Subject: R: [Nova-Roma] Re: Revival of
    > gladiatorial tuornaments in
    > Rome
    > > > To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
    > > > Date: Saturday, December 20, 2008, 7:13 PM
    > > > L. Livia Plauta Gallo Solari Alexandro S,P.D.
    > > >
    > > > (English translation follows)
    > > > Caro Alexander, si vede che non frequenti molto
    > la lista
    > > > italiana di
    > > > NR (Pomerium), se mi prendi per americana.
    > > > Purtroppo so di quello che parlo, infatti appena
    > ho
    > > > raccontato a
    > > > parenti a amici di essermi unita a Nova Roma, la
    > prima
    > > > domanda di
    > > > tutti è stata: "ma non sono fascisti?"
    > > >
    > > > Forse sei molto giovane, oppure frequenti gente
    > priva di
    > > > coscienza
    > > > storica, tutte ragioni per cui potresti non
    > esserti accorto
    > > > che nella
    > > > mente di molta gente Roma e il fascismo sono
    > ancora
    > > > indissolubilmente
    > > > legati.
    > > >
    > > > Per quanto riguarda
    > l'"americanizzazione" dei
    > > > musei capisco le tue
    > > > preoccupazioni, e queste cose danno fastidio
    > anche a me,
    > > > sono però un
    > > > piccolo prezzo da pagare se poi ci sono anche
    > ricostruzioni
    > > > virtuali,
    > > > pannelli esplicativi in varie lingue, ecc.
    > > >
    > > > Per quanto riguarda il MTR, se non vuoi chiamarli
    > > > neofascisti, li
    > > > chiamerò criptofascisti.
    > > > Adesso è molto di moda riproporre le ideologie
    > fasciste
    > > > pur negando
    > > > di essere fascisti. Io però, come sanno quelli
    > che mi
    > > > conoscono, sono
    > > > una che chiama le cose con il loro nome, quindi
    > quelli li
    > > > chiamo
    > > > fascisti, fascisti, fascisti.
    > > >
    > > > Ho avuto occasione di vedere parecchi di loro il
    > 21 aprile
    > > > scorso a
    > > > Roma, durante una visita dei fori da loro
    > organizzata. Li
    > > > ho visti in
    > > > faccia, li ho sentiti parlare, e ti assicuro che
    > io i
    > > > fascisti li so
    > > > riconoscere. Per non parlare del loro modo di
    > fare
    > > > l'osculatio, che
    > > > finisce in saluto fascista ...
    > > >
    > > > Ah, visto che sei di Bononia, salutami
    > Marullinus, che ho
    > > > avuto
    > > > occasione di incontrare molto meno di quanto
    > sperassi.
    > > >
    > > >
    > > > Dear Alexander, it shows that you are not very
    > present on
    > > > the italian
    > > > NR list (Pomerium), if you think I'm
    > american.
    > > > Unfortunately I know what I'm talking about.
    > In fact,
    > > > when I told
    > > > relatives and friends that I joined Nova Roma,
    > their first
    > > > question
    > > > was invariably: "but aren't they
    > fascists?"
    > > >
    > > > Maybe you are very young, or you only have
    > friends without
    > > >
    > > > historical conscience, so you might not have
    > realized that
    > > > in the
    > > > minds of many people ancient Rome is still
    > stronlgy linked
    > > > with
    > > > fascism.
    > > >
    > > > I understand your worries about the
    > > > "americanization" of museums, and
    > > > these things disturb me as well, but they are a
    > small price
    > > > to pay,
    > > > if there are also virtual reconstructions,
    > multilingual
    > > > panels, etc.
    > > >
    > > > As to MTR, if you don't want to call them
    > neofascists,
    > > > I'll call them
    > > > cryptofascists.
    > > > Nowadays it's very fashionable to repropose
    > fascist
    > > > ideologies, even
    > > > while negating being fascist. But, as the people
    > who know
    > > > me know, I
    > > > call things with their name, so I call those
    > people
    > > > fascists,
    > > > fascists, fascists.
    > > >
    > > > I have had the chance to meet a lot of them last
    > April 21
    > > > in Rome,
    > > > during a visit of the Imperial fora they
    > organized. I saw
    > > > their
    > > > faces, I heard them talk, and I assure you that I
    > can
    > > > recognize
    > > > fascists. Not to talk about their way of doing
    > osculatio,
    > > > ending with
    > > > a fascist salute ...
    > > >
    > > > Ah, and since you are from Bononia, please say
    > hello for me
    > > > to
    > > > Marullinus, whom I had the chance to meet less
    > times than I
    > > > wished.
    > > >
    > > > Optime vale,
    > > > Livia
    > > > >
    > > > >
    > > > > Spectata Livia Plauta,
    > > > >
    > > > >
    > > > >
    > > > > I hope you won't mind letting me give a
    > few
    > > > information "first
    > > > hand", given
    > > > > that I am Italian.
    > > > >
    > > > > _____
    > > > >
    > > > >
    > > > >
    > > > >
    > > > > There has been a shift in the way italian
    > public
    > > > opinion considers
    > > > > ancient Rome, because it seems that finally
    > enough
    > > > time has passed
    > > > > for it to lose its psychological association
    > with
    > > > fascism.
    > > > >
    > > > >
    > > > >
    > > > > Nobody in Italy have seen Rome
    > psychologically
    > > > associated with
    > > > Fascism for
    > > > > the last 40 years, at least.
    > > > >
    > > > > Well, if not nobody, just very very few
    > associated
    > > > Rome and Fascism
    > > > after
    > > > > World War II. The vast majority thought that
    > the love
    > > > for Rome
    > > > fascists had,
    > > > > was abusive. No shifts, then.
    > > > >
    > > > >
    > > > >
    > > > > Initiatives like this fit into
    > Berlusconi's policy
    > > > of making
    > > > museums
    > > > > more spectacular and more
    > "american", a
    > > > policy which should be
    > > > > welcome, if it will mean "easier to
    > read"
    > > > museums, with
    > > > multilingual
    > > > > information boards, and maybe even that
    > museums will
    > > > be open in the
    > > > > afternoon!
    > > > >
    > > > > I have never been in America, so I do not
    > know how an
    > > > American
    > > > museum looks
    > > > > like.
    > > > >
    > > > > It is widely claimed in Italy that yes,
    > Italian
    > > > museums are getting
    > > > more
    > > > > American.
    > > > >
    > > > > What I know is that our museums are getting
    > worse.
    > > > Childish
    > > > explanation,
    > > > > comics, large useless boards filled with
    > sillynesses.
    > > > >
    > > > > "Slyppery surface", "mind the
    > > > gap", "mind your head" boars every
    >
    > > > where;
    > > > > shops selling useless ugly toys: that's
    > what we in
    > > > more American
    > > > museum.
    > > > >
    > > > > At the same time, less objects on display.
    > > > >
    > > > >
    > > > >
    > > > > But this does not mean that the attitude to
    > Cultus
    > > > Deorum has
    > > > changed
    > > > > in any way.
    > > > > What the majority of Italians would think of
    > it if
    > > > they had ever
    > > > > heard about it, is that its followers must
    > be
    > > > satanists or mental
    > > > > patients.
    > > > >
    > > > >
    > > > >
    > > > > Obviously few Italians ever heard about
    > Cultus
    > > > Deorum.
    > > > >
    > > > > But no, that idea is not linked with
    > Satanism, and it
    > > > wouldn't.
    > > > Rome, in
    > > > > Italy, is at the same time our history
    > > > and..."ourselves".
    > > > >
    > > > > Even the Church is...Roman!
    > > > >
    > > > > Mental patients, yeah...maybe..more probably
    > simply
    > > > dreamers.
    > > > >
    > > > > The biggest organization that tries to
    > revive religio
    > > >
    > > > > Romana in Italy (and the only one in Rome)
    > is still
    > > > the MTR
    > > > > (Movimento Tradizionale Romano), a barely
    > disguised
    > > > neofascist
    > > > > organization.
    > > > >
    > > > >
    > > > >
    > > > > I perfectly know MTR, I regularly read their
    > papers, I
    > > > know first
    > > > hand many
    > > > > members and, to give an example, two hours
    > ago I
    > > > received an sms
    > > > about Dies
    > > > > Natalis Solis by one of the chairmans. I
    > sometimes
    > > > participate in
    > > > their
    > > > > activities.
    > > > >
    > > > > BARELY DISGUISED NEOFASCIST ORGANIZATION.
    > > > >
    > > > > My Englisg is poor, but I understand that
    > you are
    > > > stating that MTR
    > > > is made
    > > > > by fascists that try to disguise, to cover ,
    > the fact
    > > > that they are
    > > > > fascists. Moreover, the word
    > "barely" gives
    > > > the idea that they
    > > > would like to
    > > > > hide better than they can do.
    > > > >
    > > > > Sorry, Plauta. MTR is not a fascist or
    > neofascist
    > > > organizations.
    > > > >
    > > > > I have no idea if people in America is able
    > or apt to
    > > > understand
    > > > what
    > > > > Fascism was: I think it is impossible for
    > you, but it
    > > > is only an
    > > > opinion.
    > > > >
    > > > > Well, we have to choose one: either you
    > don't know
    > > > what Fascism
    > > > really is;
    > > > > or you do not know what MTR is. Tertium non
    > datur.
    > > > >
    > > > > Moreover, "neofascist" is surely
    > derogatory
    > > > in Italian, I suppose
    > > > it be
    > > > > derogatory in English too. Let's avoid
    > derogatory
    > > > words.
    > > > >
    > > > > Yes, I understand you would call fascists
    > some of
    > > > them. I can even
    > > > admit
    > > > > that some of them would not dislike some
    > specific
    > > > aspects of
    > > > Fascism. So
    > > > > what?
    > > > >
    > > > > This is not enough for calling an
    > organization
    > > > FASCIST. Most of all
    > > > if the
    > > > > intention is to offend.
    > > > >
    > > > > Anyway, you know, I don't want to be
    > impolite
    > > > towards people in the
    > > > Usa, but
    > > > > if criticism of Italian history and Italian
    > culture
    > > > comes from the
    > > > > USA..well...we find it a bit difficult to
    > accept
    > > > lessons.
    > > > >
    > > > > We might discuss what Fascism did for the
    > renaissasnce
    > > > of Roman
    > > > culture and
    > > > > civilization in Italy. And I am speaking of
    > diggings,
    > > > opening of
    > > > museum
    > > > > (without multilingual boards), money spent
    > in creating
    > > > universities
    > > > and so
    > > > > on. And they did something of paramount
    > importance.
    > > > Unrivalled
    > > > until today,
    > > > > like it or not.
    > > > >
    > > > > I think it would be best to avoid
    > > > "philosophical" discussion. I
    > > > don't mind,
    > > > > though..
    > > > >
    > > > > Or you could give us some hints stating what
    > aspects
    > > > of MTR are
    > > > fascist.
    > > > > That would be to me of great interest.
    > > > >
    > > > >
    > > > >
    > > > > Reverenter
    > > > >
    > > > >
    > > > >
    > > > > Gallus Solaris Alexander
    > > > >
    > > > > Bononiae
    > > > >
    > > > > ITALIA!
    > > > >
    > >
    Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60058 From: Q. Valerius Poplicola Date: 2008-12-21
    Subject: R: [Nova-Roma] Re: Revival of gladiatorial tuornaments in Rome
    Q. Valerius Ap. Galerio:

    This isn't the first time you've gone off on something as "fascist"
    when it in fact isn't related to fascism. I for one am not going to
    let some morons 70-80 years ago ruin a symbol of ancient Rome just
    because they happened to take a liking to it. Hitler also used the
    eagle as a standard, but no one, not Nova Roma, not America, is going
    to give that up. If MTR is fascist, they are not because of any
    salute. If they are fascist, then they want a despotic leader or
    authoritarian oligarchy running the nation, including but not limited
    to the abolition of capitalism.

    I think perhaps your perhaps statement is a bit of an understatement.
    And I do mean this not at all spiteful, and not as a defense of MTR,
    which I do not know enough about personally (though I never saw
    anything fascist from what I little I did see).

    pro amore deorum.

    --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Robert Levee <galerius_of_rome@...>
    wrote:
    >
    > Salve et salvete,
    >
    > So then in your opinion this is just a throwback to a normal Roman
    custom, to use that salute.Perhaps I am a little faciophobic.After the
    events of WWII, I seem to have a hard time understanding how certain
    segments of cerrent era group,s would care to be associated with such
    a symbol of modern day tyrany and genocide, irregardless of the fact
    it was a practice of Roma Antigua.Slavery was also an acceptable
    practice then, but I would hardly think that the majority of
    reasonable people today would accept that practice, or vomitarianism
    either.I'm sure we could even debate the pros and cons of those, but
    it is not what I intended when this conversation began.I only stated
    my opinion on such matters and did not intend to insult the
    sensibilities, of anyone facist or not.Bear in mind once again it is
    only an opinion of mine, erroneous or not.
    >
    > Io Saturnalia
    > Ap.Galerius Aurelianus
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >
    > --- On Sun, 12/21/08, Q. Valerius Poplicola <catullus.poeta@...> wrote:
    >
    > > From: Q. Valerius Poplicola <catullus.poeta@...>
    > > Subject: R: [Nova-Roma] Re: Revival of gladiatorial tuornaments in
    Rome
    > > To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
    > > Date: Sunday, December 21, 2008, 2:50 AM
    > > Even the British HBO series "Rome" uses the salute
    > > as a normal Roman
    > > salute. Using the salute in no way makes it
    > > "fascist".
    > >
    > > QVP
    > >
    > > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Robert Levee
    > > <galerius_of_rome@>
    > > wrote:
    > > >
    > > > Ap.Galerius Aurelianus L.Livia Plauta S.P.D.
    > > >
    > > > I must agree with you.If it walks like a duck and
    > > looks like a duck.....
    > > > Besides the facist salute is a dead giveaway.
    > > >
    > > > Io Saturnalia
    > > > Ap.Galerius Aurelianus
    > > >
    > > >
    > > > --- On Sat, 12/20/08, Lucia Livia Plauta
    > > <cases@> wrote:
    > > >
    > > > > From: Lucia Livia Plauta <cases@>
    > > > > Subject: R: [Nova-Roma] Re: Revival of
    > > gladiatorial tuornaments in
    > > Rome
    > > > > To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
    > > > > Date: Saturday, December 20, 2008, 7:13 PM
    > > > > L. Livia Plauta Gallo Solari Alexandro S,P.D.
    > > > >
    > > > > (English translation follows)
    > > > > Caro Alexander, si vede che non frequenti molto
    > > la lista
    > > > > italiana di
    > > > > NR (Pomerium), se mi prendi per americana.
    > > > > Purtroppo so di quello che parlo, infatti appena
    > > ho
    > > > > raccontato a
    > > > > parenti a amici di essermi unita a Nova Roma, la
    > > prima
    > > > > domanda di
    > > > > tutti è stata: "ma non sono fascisti?"
    > > > >
    > > > > Forse sei molto giovane, oppure frequenti gente
    > > priva di
    > > > > coscienza
    > > > > storica, tutte ragioni per cui potresti non
    > > esserti accorto
    > > > > che nella
    > > > > mente di molta gente Roma e il fascismo sono
    > > ancora
    > > > > indissolubilmente
    > > > > legati.
    > > > >
    > > > > Per quanto riguarda
    > > l'"americanizzazione" dei
    > > > > musei capisco le tue
    > > > > preoccupazioni, e queste cose danno fastidio
    > > anche a me,
    > > > > sono però un
    > > > > piccolo prezzo da pagare se poi ci sono anche
    > > ricostruzioni
    > > > > virtuali,
    > > > > pannelli esplicativi in varie lingue, ecc.
    > > > >
    > > > > Per quanto riguarda il MTR, se non vuoi chiamarli
    > > > > neofascisti, li
    > > > > chiamerò criptofascisti.
    > > > > Adesso è molto di moda riproporre le ideologie
    > > fasciste
    > > > > pur negando
    > > > > di essere fascisti. Io però, come sanno quelli
    > > che mi
    > > > > conoscono, sono
    > > > > una che chiama le cose con il loro nome, quindi
    > > quelli li
    > > > > chiamo
    > > > > fascisti, fascisti, fascisti.
    > > > >
    > > > > Ho avuto occasione di vedere parecchi di loro il
    > > 21 aprile
    > > > > scorso a
    > > > > Roma, durante una visita dei fori da loro
    > > organizzata. Li
    > > > > ho visti in
    > > > > faccia, li ho sentiti parlare, e ti assicuro che
    > > io i
    > > > > fascisti li so
    > > > > riconoscere. Per non parlare del loro modo di
    > > fare
    > > > > l'osculatio, che
    > > > > finisce in saluto fascista ...
    > > > >
    > > > > Ah, visto che sei di Bononia, salutami
    > > Marullinus, che ho
    > > > > avuto
    > > > > occasione di incontrare molto meno di quanto
    > > sperassi.
    > > > >
    > > > >
    > > > > Dear Alexander, it shows that you are not very
    > > present on
    > > > > the italian
    > > > > NR list (Pomerium), if you think I'm
    > > american.
    > > > > Unfortunately I know what I'm talking about.
    > > In fact,
    > > > > when I told
    > > > > relatives and friends that I joined Nova Roma,
    > > their first
    > > > > question
    > > > > was invariably: "but aren't they
    > > fascists?"
    > > > >
    > > > > Maybe you are very young, or you only have
    > > friends without
    > > > >
    > > > > historical conscience, so you might not have
    > > realized that
    > > > > in the
    > > > > minds of many people ancient Rome is still
    > > stronlgy linked
    > > > > with
    > > > > fascism.
    > > > >
    > > > > I understand your worries about the
    > > > > "americanization" of museums, and
    > > > > these things disturb me as well, but they are a
    > > small price
    > > > > to pay,
    > > > > if there are also virtual reconstructions,
    > > multilingual
    > > > > panels, etc.
    > > > >
    > > > > As to MTR, if you don't want to call them
    > > neofascists,
    > > > > I'll call them
    > > > > cryptofascists.
    > > > > Nowadays it's very fashionable to repropose
    > > fascist
    > > > > ideologies, even
    > > > > while negating being fascist. But, as the people
    > > who know
    > > > > me know, I
    > > > > call things with their name, so I call those
    > > people
    > > > > fascists,
    > > > > fascists, fascists.
    > > > >
    > > > > I have had the chance to meet a lot of them last
    > > April 21
    > > > > in Rome,
    > > > > during a visit of the Imperial fora they
    > > organized. I saw
    > > > > their
    > > > > faces, I heard them talk, and I assure you that I
    > > can
    > > > > recognize
    > > > > fascists. Not to talk about their way of doing
    > > osculatio,
    > > > > ending with
    > > > > a fascist salute ...
    > > > >
    > > > > Ah, and since you are from Bononia, please say
    > > hello for me
    > > > > to
    > > > > Marullinus, whom I had the chance to meet less
    > > times than I
    > > > > wished.
    > > > >
    > > > > Optime vale,
    > > > > Livia
    > > > > >
    > > > > >
    > > > > > Spectata Livia Plauta,
    > > > > >
    > > > > >
    > > > > >
    > > > > > I hope you won't mind letting me give a
    > > few
    > > > > information "first
    > > > > hand", given
    > > > > > that I am Italian.
    > > > > >
    > > > > > _____
    > > > > >
    > > > > >
    > > > > >
    > > > > >
    > > > > > There has been a shift in the way italian
    > > public
    > > > > opinion considers
    > > > > > ancient Rome, because it seems that finally
    > > enough
    > > > > time has passed
    > > > > > for it to lose its psychological association
    > > with
    > > > > fascism.
    > > > > >
    > > > > >
    > > > > >
    > > > > > Nobody in Italy have seen Rome
    > > psychologically
    > > > > associated with
    > > > > Fascism for
    > > > > > the last 40 years, at least.
    > > > > >
    > > > > > Well, if not nobody, just very very few
    > > associated
    > > > > Rome and Fascism
    > > > > after
    > > > > > World War II. The vast majority thought that
    > > the love
    > > > > for Rome
    > > > > fascists had,
    > > > > > was abusive. No shifts, then.
    > > > > >
    > > > > >
    > > > > >
    > > > > > Initiatives like this fit into
    > > Berlusconi's policy
    > > > > of making
    > > > > museums
    > > > > > more spectacular and more
    > > "american", a
    > > > > policy which should be
    > > > > > welcome, if it will mean "easier to
    > > read"
    > > > > museums, with
    > > > > multilingual
    > > > > > information boards, and maybe even that
    > > museums will
    > > > > be open in the
    > > > > > afternoon!
    > > > > >
    > > > > > I have never been in America, so I do not
    > > know how an
    > > > > American
    > > > > museum looks
    > > > > > like.
    > > > > >
    > > > > > It is widely claimed in Italy that yes,
    > > Italian
    > > > > museums are getting
    > > > > more
    > > > > > American.
    > > > > >
    > > > > > What I know is that our museums are getting
    > > worse.
    > > > > Childish
    > > > > explanation,
    > > > > > comics, large useless boards filled with
    > > sillynesses.
    > > > > >
    > > > > > "Slyppery surface", "mind the
    > > > > gap", "mind your head" boars every
    > >
    > > > > where;
    > > > > > shops selling useless ugly toys: that's
    > > what we in
    > > > > more American
    > > > > museum.
    > > > > >
    > > > > > At the same time, less objects on display.
    > > > > >
    > > > > >
    > > > > >
    > > > > > But this does not mean that the attitude to
    > > Cultus
    > > > > Deorum has
    > > > > changed
    > > > > > in any way.
    > > > > > What the majority of Italians would think of
    > > it if
    > > > > they had ever
    > > > > > heard about it, is that its followers must
    > > be
    > > > > satanists or mental
    > > > > > patients.
    > > > > >
    > > > > >
    > > > > >
    > > > > > Obviously few Italians ever heard about
    > > Cultus
    > > > > Deorum.
    > > > > >
    > > > > > But no, that idea is not linked with
    > > Satanism, and it
    > > > > wouldn't.
    > > > > Rome, in
    > > > > > Italy, is at the same time our history
    > > > > and..."ourselves".
    > > > > >
    > > > > > Even the Church is...Roman!
    > > > > >
    > > > > > Mental patients, yeah...maybe..more probably
    > > simply
    > > > > dreamers.
    > > > > >
    > > > > > The biggest organization that tries to
    > > revive religio
    > > > >
    > > > > > Romana in Italy (and the only one in Rome)
    > > is still
    > > > > the MTR
    > > > > > (Movimento Tradizionale Romano), a barely
    > > disguised
    > > > > neofascist
    > > > > > organization.
    > > > > >
    > > > > >
    > > > > >
    > > > > > I perfectly know MTR, I regularly read their
    > > papers, I
    > > > > know first
    > > > > hand many
    > > > > > members and, to give an example, two hours
    > > ago I
    > > > > received an sms
    > > > > about Dies
    > > > > > Natalis Solis by one of the chairmans. I
    > > sometimes
    > > > > participate in
    > > > > their
    > > > > > activities.
    > > > > >
    > > > > > BARELY DISGUISED NEOFASCIST ORGANIZATION.
    > > > > >
    > > > > > My Englisg is poor, but I understand that
    > > you are
    > > > > stating that MTR
    > > > > is made
    > > > > > by fascists that try to disguise, to cover ,
    > > the fact
    > > > > that they are
    > > > > > fascists. Moreover, the word
    > > "barely" gives
    > > > > the idea that they
    > > > > would like to
    > > > > > hide better than they can do.
    > > > > >
    > > > > > Sorry, Plauta. MTR is not a fascist or
    > > neofascist
    > > > > organizations.
    > > > > >
    > > > > > I have no idea if people in America is able
    > > or apt to
    > > > > understand
    > > > > what
    > > > > > Fascism was: I think it is impossible for
    > > you, but it
    > > > > is only an
    > > > > opinion.
    > > > > >
    > > > > > Well, we have to choose one: either you
    > > don't know
    > > > > what Fascism
    > > > > really is;
    > > > > > or you do not know what MTR is. Tertium non
    > > datur.
    > > > > >
    > > > > > Moreover, "neofascist" is surely
    > > derogatory
    > > > > in Italian, I suppose
    > > > > it be
    > > > > > derogatory in English too. Let's avoid
    > > derogatory
    > > > > words.
    > > > > >
    > > > > > Yes, I understand you would call fascists
    > > some of
    > > > > them. I can even
    > > > > admit
    > > > > > that some of them would not dislike some
    > > specific
    > > > > aspects of
    > > > > Fascism. So
    > > > > > what?
    > > > > >
    > > > > > This is not enough for calling an
    > > organization
    > > > > FASCIST. Most of all
    > > > > if the
    > > > > > intention is to offend.
    > > > > >
    > > > > > Anyway, you know, I don't want to be
    > > impolite
    > > > > towards people in the
    > > > > Usa, but
    > > > > > if criticism of Italian history and Italian
    > > culture
    > > > > comes from the
    > > > > > USA..well...we find it a bit difficult to
    > > accept
    > > > > lessons.
    > > > > >
    > > > > > We might discuss what Fascism did for the
    > > renaissasnce
    > > > > of Roman
    > > > > culture and
    > > > > > civilization in Italy. And I am speaking of
    > > diggings,
    > > > > opening of
    > > > > museum
    > > > > > (without multilingual boards), money spent
    > > in creating
    > > > > universities
    > > > > and so
    > > > > > on. And they did something of paramount
    > > importance.
    > > > > Unrivalled
    > > > > until today,
    > > > > > like it or not.
    > > > > >
    > > > > > I think it would be best to avoid
    > > > > "philosophical" discussion. I
    > > > > don't mind,
    > > > > > though..
    > > > > >
    > > > > > Or you could give us some hints stating what
    > > aspects
    > > > > of MTR are
    > > > > fascist.
    > > > > > That would be to me of great interest.
    > > > > >
    > > > > >
    > > > > >
    > > > > > Reverenter
    > > > > >
    > > > > >
    > > > > >
    > > > > > Gallus Solaris Alexander
    > > > > >
    > > > > > Bononiae
    > > > > >
    > > > > > ITALIA!
    > > > > >
    > > >
    >
    Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60059 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2008-12-21
    Subject: Analemma over the Karyatidai
    Analemma over the Karyatidai A. Tullia Scholastica quiritibus, sociis, peregrinisque bonae voluntatis S.P.D.

        Today’s Astronomy Picture of the Day shows the analemma over the Karyatid Porch of the Erekhtheion in Athens.  It’s quite pretty.  

            <http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/astropix.html>

        Valete.  
    Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60060 From: Gaius Petronius Dexter Date: 2008-12-21
    Subject: Today in Rome: Dec 21, 2008.
    C. Petronius Dexter omnibus Quiritibus s.p.d.,
     
    Today in Rome :
     
    (Julian day : 2 454 822).
     
    A. d. XII Kalendas Ianuarias
    MMDCCLXII anno Vrbis conditae.
    Coss. M. Moravio T. Iulio.
     
    Day of the week : Solis dies (Sunday).
     
    Lunaris dies: XXV.
    Nundinal letter : C.
     
    Hora ortus Solis : 07:34.
    Hora occasus Solis : 16:42.
    Temp. Min. : 2° C.
    Temp. Max. : 15° C.
    Wind on Rome : 20 Km/h.
    Humidity: 60%.
    Weather: More sun than clouds. Cool.
     
    Horae diei :
     
    I: 07:34 - 08:18 Mercurii hora.
    II: 08:18 - 09:02 Lunae hora.
    III: 09:02 - 09:47 Saturni hora.
    IV: 09:47 - 10:31 Iovis hora.
    V: 10:31 - 11:15 Martis hora.
    VI: 11:15 - 12:00 Solis hora.
    VII: 12:00 - 12:47 Veneris hora.
    VIII: 12:47 - 13:34 Mercurii hora.
    IX: 13:34 - 14:21 Lunae hora.
    X: 14:21 - 15:08 Saturni hora.
    XI: 15:08 - 15:55 Iovis hora.
    XII: 15:55 - 16:42 Martis hora.
     

    Horae noctis :
     
    I: 16:42 - 17:55 Solis hora.
    II: 17:55 - 19:08 Veneris hora.
    III: 19:08 - 20:21 Mercurii hora.
    IV: 20:21 - 21:34 Lunae hora.
    V: 21:34 - 22:47 Saturni hora.
    VI: 22:47 - 00:00 Iovis hora.
    VII: 00:00 - 01:15 Martis hora.
    VIII: 01:15 - 02:31 Solis hora.
    IX: 02:31 - 03:47 Veneris hora.
    X: 03:47 - 05:02 Mercurii hora.
    XI: 05:02 - 06:18 Lunae hora.
    XII: 06:18 - 07:34 Saturni hora.
     
     
     
    Valete.
     
    C. Petronius Dexter.
    Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60061 From: marcushoratius Date: 2008-12-21
    Subject: a. d. XII Kalendas Ianuarias: Divalia Angeronae
    M. Moravius Piscinus Horatianus cultoribus Deorum, Quiritibus et
    omnibus salutem plurimam dicit: Io Saturnalia! Io Triumphe!

    Hodie est ante diem XII Kalendas Ianuarias; haec dies nefastus est:
    Divalia Angeronae.

    Felices natalis P. Constantine Placide!


    "Saturn is thought to have come first into Italy; so also the
    Virgilian muse testifies in these verses:

    First from the Olympian aether came Saturn,
    Fleeing the weapons of Jupiter, etc.

    "So much simplicity of the men of old had been handed down to that
    time, that when foreigners came to them, who indeed they were able
    with their counsel and wisdom to instruct them in how to live and
    form their customs, these not knowing their parents and origin, they
    not only believed them born from Sky and Earth, indeed also they so
    informed their descendants concerning this Saturn, whom they said was
    the son of Sky and Earth." ~ Sextus Aurelius Victor, De Origines
    genti Romanae 1.1-2


    Divalia:

    "The Angeronalia, from Angerona, to whom a sacrifice is made in the
    Curia Acculeia and for whom this day is a public festival." ~ M.
    Terrentius Varro, Lingua Latinae 6.23

    "A festival for the Goddesses Angeronae to whom the pontifices make
    sacrifice in the Temple of Volupa; from which, according to Verrius
    Flaccus, it receives the name Angeronia, in propitiation for
    expelling anguish and anxiety." ~ Macrobius, Saturnalia 1.10

    "Last and greater than all, Rome herself, whose other name the
    hallowed mysteries of the sacred rites forbid us to mention without
    being guilty of the greatest impiety. After it had been long kept
    buried in secrecy with the strictest fidelity and in respectful and
    salutary silence, Valerius Soranus dared to divulge it, but soon did
    he pay the penalty of his rashness.

    "It will not perhaps be altogether foreign to the purpose, if I here
    make mention of one peculiar institution of our forefathers which
    bears especial reference to the inculcation of silence on religious
    matters. The Goddess Angerona, to whom sacrifice is offered on the
    twelfth day before the calends of January [21st December], is
    represented in Her statue as having Her mouth bound with a sealed
    fillet." ~ C. Plinius Secundus, Historia Naturalis 3.9.65-67

    Angerona was thought by some to be a Goddess who both brought on and
    relieved anguish and fear. She was associated with Bona Dea Angitia,
    who had lived along the shores of Lake Fucinus among the Marrubians
    and the Marsi. Her sacred grove in the Silva Angitia lay towards Alba
    (Orelli, nos. 115; 116; 1846). Myth identified Angitia with Medea,
    coming from Colchis to Italy with Jason, where she taught on how to
    heal with herbs (Silius Italicus, Punica 8.498, etc.). But She was
    also identified with Muta or Tacita, the Goddess whose name must
    never be revealed.

    "Verrius Flaccus cites authors whom he deems worthy of credit, to
    show that on the occasion of a siege, it was the usage, the first
    thing of all, for the Roman priests to summon forth the tutelary
    divinity of that particular town, and to promise him the same rites,
    or even a more extended worship, at Rome; and at the present day
    even, this ritual still forms part of the discipline of our pontiffs.
    Hence it is, no doubt, that the name of the tutelary deity of Rome
    has been so strictly kept concealed, lest any of our enemies should
    act in a similar manner." ~ C. Plinius Secundus, Historia Naturalis
    28.4

    Many have speculated on what Her true name may have been. Some of
    these have thought Angerona to be Favra or Fona, Acca, Flora, or
    Valesia, Valentia, Sorana, or Hirpa, any of which could also be
    identified with Feronia or Vibia.


    AUC 822 / 69 CE: The Senate officially recognized Vespasianus as
    emperor.


    Our thought for today is from Epicurus, Vatican Sayings 34:

    "We do not so much need the assistance of our friends as we do the
    confidence of their assistance in need."