Selected messages in Nova-Roma group. Jan 10-23, 2009

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60457 From: nimrodconjuror Date: 2009-01-10
Subject: Re: Nova Roman Ring
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60458 From: M. Lucretius Agricola Date: 2009-01-10
Subject: Re: Nova Roman Ring
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60459 From: Cocceius Spinula Date: 2009-01-10
Subject: S·T·T·L: Postuma Sempronia Graccha Placidia
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60460 From: Tiberius Horatius Barbatus Date: 2009-01-11
Subject: Re: Nova Roman Ring
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60461 From: Stefn Ullerius Venator Piperbarbus Date: 2009-01-11
Subject: Possible name change...thoughts
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60462 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2009-01-11
Subject: Re: Possible name change...thoughts
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60463 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2009-01-11
Subject: Re: Obituary: Postuma Sempronia Graccha Placidia
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60464 From: Gaius Petronius Dexter Date: 2009-01-11
Subject: Re: Obituary: Postuma Sempronia Graccha Placidia
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60465 From: Cn. Cornelius Lentulus Date: 2009-01-11
Subject: Re: Possible name change...thoughts
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60466 From: Publius Memmius Albucius Date: 2009-01-11
Subject: Re: Obituary and web site
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60467 From: Cn. Cornelius Lentulus Date: 2009-01-11
Subject: R: [Nova-Roma] Re: Obituary and web site
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60468 From: Gaius Petronius Dexter Date: 2009-01-11
Subject: Re: Possible name change...thoughts
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60469 From: Cn. Cornelius Lentulus Date: 2009-01-11
Subject: Invitation to Our All Latin Mailing List
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60470 From: Gaius Petronius Dexter Date: 2009-01-11
Subject: Re: Invitation to Our All Latin Mailing List
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60471 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2009-01-11
Subject: a.d. III Eid. Ian. - The Carmentalia
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60472 From: deciusiunius Date: 2009-01-11
Subject: Re: Nova Roman Ring
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60473 From: Bruno Cantermi Date: 2009-01-11
Subject: Re: Possible name change...thoughts
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60474 From: Gallagher Date: 2009-01-11
Subject: Re: Nova Roman Ring
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60475 From: Stefn Ullerius Venator Piperbarbus Date: 2009-01-11
Subject: Re: Possible name change...thoughts
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60476 From: Stefn Ullerius Venator Piperbarbus Date: 2009-01-11
Subject: Re: Possible name change...thoughts
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60477 From: Stefn Ullerius Venator Piperbarbus Date: 2009-01-11
Subject: Re: Possible name change...thoughts
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60478 From: Cn. Cornelius Lentulus Date: 2009-01-11
Subject: Re: Possible name change...thoughts
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60479 From: Stefn Ullerius Venator Piperbarbus Date: 2009-01-11
Subject: Re: Possible name change...thoughts
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60480 From: Stefn Ullerius Venator Piperbarbus Date: 2009-01-11
Subject: Re: Possible name change...thoughts
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60481 From: Cn. Cornelius Lentulus Date: 2009-01-11
Subject: Re: Possible name change...thoughts
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60482 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2009-01-11
Subject: Re: Possible name change...thoughts
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60483 From: Cn. Cornelius Lentulus Date: 2009-01-11
Subject: Re: Possible name change...thoughts
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60484 From: Cn. Cornelius Lentulus Date: 2009-01-11
Subject: Re: Possible name change...thoughts
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60485 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2009-01-11
Subject: Re: Possible name change...thoughts
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60486 From: Sondra Date: 2009-01-11
Subject: Re: Nova Roman Ring
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60487 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2009-01-11
Subject: Re: Nova Roman Ring
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60488 From: Gaius Marcius Crispus Date: 2009-01-11
Subject: Nova Roma ring
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60489 From: Stefn Ullerius Venator Piperbarbus Date: 2009-01-11
Subject: Re: Possible name change...thoughts
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60490 From: segestamilius Date: 2009-01-11
Subject: Re: Nova Roma ring
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60491 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2009-01-11
Subject: Re: Nova Roma ring
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60492 From: Bruno Cantermi Date: 2009-01-11
Subject: Re: Possible name change...thoughts
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60493 From: Gaius Marcius Crispus Date: 2009-01-11
Subject: Nova Roma ring
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60494 From: Lucia Livia Plauta Date: 2009-01-11
Subject: Re: Nova Roma ring
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60495 From: Gallagher Date: 2009-01-11
Subject: Re: Nova Roman Ring
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60496 From: Gallagher Date: 2009-01-11
Subject: Re: Nova Roman Ring
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60497 From: Gaius Petronius Dexter Date: 2009-01-11
Subject: Re: Possible name change...thoughts
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60498 From: Gallagher Date: 2009-01-11
Subject: FW: SPQR ring
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60499 From: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com Date: 2009-01-11
Subject: File - language.txt
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60500 From: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com Date: 2009-01-11
Subject: File - EDICTUM DE SERMONE
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60501 From: Gallagher Date: 2009-01-11
Subject: Re: File - EDICTUM DE SERMONE
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60502 From: Cn. Cornelius Lentulus Date: 2009-01-11
Subject: R: [Nova-Roma] Re: Possible name change...thoughts
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60503 From: Gallagher Date: 2009-01-11
Subject: Re: R: [Nova-Roma] Re: Possible name change...thoughts
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60504 From: fauxrari Date: 2009-01-11
Subject: Re: Possible name change...thoughts
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60505 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2009-01-11
Subject: Re: File - EDICTUM DE SERMONE
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60506 From: Colin Cunningham Date: 2009-01-11
Subject: Re: File - EDICTUM DE SERMONE
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60507 From: Maior Date: 2009-01-11
Subject: Re: a.d. III Eid. Ian. - The Carmentalia
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60508 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2009-01-11
Subject: Re: R: [Nova-Roma] Re: Possible name change...thoughts
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60509 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2009-01-11
Subject: Re: File - EDICTUM DE SERMONE
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60510 From: Colin Cunningham Date: 2009-01-11
Subject: Re: File - EDICTUM DE SERMONE
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60511 From: Titus Arminius Genialis Date: 2009-01-12
Subject: Alguém fala português? / Does anyone speak Portuguese?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60512 From: Gaius Petronius Dexter Date: 2009-01-12
Subject: Re: R: [Nova-Roma] Re: Possible name change...thoughts
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60513 From: marcushoratius Date: 2009-01-12
Subject: Pridie Eidus Ianuarias: Coriolanus, Veturina, and Volumnia
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60514 From: Kristoffer From Date: 2009-01-12
Subject: Re: Possible name change...thoughts
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60515 From: José Bellissimo Date: 2009-01-12
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Alguém fala português? / Does anyone speak Portugu
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60516 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2009-01-12
Subject: Hercules and the Cattle of Geryon
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60517 From: Colin Brodd Date: 2009-01-12
Subject: Internet Problems
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60518 From: Cn. Cornelius Lentulus Date: 2009-01-12
Subject: Re: R: [Nova-Roma] Re: Possible name change...thoughts
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60519 From: Cn. Cornelius Lentulus Date: 2009-01-12
Subject: Re: R: [Nova-Roma] Re: Possible name change...thoughts
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60520 From: Complutensis Date: 2009-01-12
Subject: EDICTUM CONSULAREM CURIATI IULI III: DE CREATIONE ACCENSORUM
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60521 From: Cocceius Spinula Date: 2009-01-12
Subject: Re: EDICTUM CONSULAREM CURIATI IULI III: DE CREATIONE ACCENSORUM
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60522 From: Titus Flavius Aquila Date: 2009-01-12
Subject: EDICTUM CONSULAREM CURIATI IULI III: DE CREATIONE ACCENSORUM
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60523 From: Complutensis Date: 2009-01-12
Subject: EDCTUM CONSULARE IV: Call for governors
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60524 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2009-01-12
Subject: Re: R: [Nova-Roma] Re: Possible name change...thoughts
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60525 From: Stefn Ullerius Venator Piperbarbus Date: 2009-01-12
Subject: Request submitted, was Re: Possible name change...thoughts
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60526 From: Q. Valerius Poplicola Date: 2009-01-12
Subject: R: [Nova-Roma] Re: Possible name change...thoughts
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60527 From: Titus Arminius Genialis Date: 2009-01-12
Subject: EDICTUM CONSULARE IV: Convocação para governadores
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60528 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2009-01-12
Subject: Re: R: [Nova-Roma] Re: Possible name change...thoughts
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60529 From: Gnaeus Iulius Caesar Date: 2009-01-12
Subject: CURULE AEDILE EDICT 62-01: APPOINTMENT OF SCRIBAE
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60530 From: Gaius Petronius Dexter Date: 2009-01-13
Subject: Re: EDICTUM CONSULAREM CURIATI IULI III: DE CREATIONE ACCENSORUM
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60531 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2009-01-13
Subject: Re: Possible name change...thoughts
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60532 From: MCC Date: 2009-01-13
Subject: EDICTO CONSULAR IV: Candidatos para governadores
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60533 From: marcushoratius Date: 2009-01-13
Subject: EIDUS IANUARIAE: feriae Iove; Caesar advances on Rome
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60534 From: Nabarz Date: 2009-01-13
Subject: Review: An Academic and Religious Journal of Greek, Roman and Persia
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60535 From: Q. Caecilius Metellus Date: 2009-01-13
Subject: Eidibus Ianuariis
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60536 From: Bruno Cantermi Date: 2009-01-13
Subject: Re: CURULE AEDILE EDICT 62-01: APPOINTMENT OF SCRIBAE
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60537 From: Tiberius Horatius Barbatus Date: 2009-01-13
Subject: Updates to the "CURRENT EVENTS" on the Main NR Site
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60538 From: Gnaeus Caelius Ahenobarbus Date: 2009-01-13
Subject: Re: R: [Nova-Roma] Re: Possible name change...thoughts
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60539 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2009-01-13
Subject: Re: Updates to the "CURRENT EVENTS" on the Main NR Site
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60540 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2009-01-13
Subject: Re: R: [Nova-Roma] Re: Possible name change...thoughts
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60541 From: Marcus Arminius Maior Date: 2009-01-13
Subject: Official NR Calendar
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60542 From: Annia Minucia Marcella Date: 2009-01-13
Subject: Re: Roman Calendar
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60543 From: Q. Caecilius Metellus Date: 2009-01-13
Subject: Re: Roman Calendar
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60544 From: Charlie Collins Date: 2009-01-13
Subject: Re: Roman Calendar
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60545 From: Charlie Collins Date: 2009-01-13
Subject: Rome by Segway
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60546 From: Annia Minucia Marcella Date: 2009-01-13
Subject: Re: Roman Calendar
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60547 From: Tiberius Horatius Barbatus Date: 2009-01-14
Subject: MithraCon
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60548 From: Q. Valerius Poplicola Date: 2009-01-14
Subject: Ancient Roman Theme Park
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60549 From: L Julia Aquila Date: 2009-01-14
Subject: Re: Ancient Roman Theme Park
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60550 From: Maior Date: 2009-01-14
Subject: Carmentalia is tomorrow
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60551 From: M. Lucretius Agricola Date: 2009-01-15
Subject: Re: Updates to the "CURRENT EVENTS" on the Main NR Site
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60552 From: Tiberius Horatius Barbatus Date: 2009-01-15
Subject: Re: Updates to the "CURRENT EVENTS" on the Main NR Site
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60553 From: M•IVL•SEVERVS Date: 2009-01-15
Subject: PLVRIMAS GRATIAS, NOVI ROMANI!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60554 From: Cocceius Spinula Date: 2009-01-15
Subject: PLVRIMAS GRATIAS, NOVI ROMANI! | Português/ Portuguese
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60555 From: M•IVL•SEVERVS Date: 2009-01-15
Subject: PLVRIMAS GRATIAS, NOVI ROMANI!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60556 From: Lucia Livia Plauta Date: 2009-01-15
Subject: Re: Ancient Roman Theme Park
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60557 From: M•IVL•SEVERVS Date: 2009-01-15
Subject: PLVRIMAS GRATIAS, NOVI ROMANI!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60558 From: Maior Date: 2009-01-15
Subject: Carmentalia
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60559 From: iulius sabinus Date: 2009-01-15
Subject: Re: Carmentalia
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60560 From: titus.aquila Date: 2009-01-16
Subject: PLVRIMAS GRATIAS, NOVI ROMANI!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60561 From: Gnaeus Caelius Ahenobarbus Date: 2009-01-16
Subject: Another Nova Roma?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60562 From: Cn. Cornelius Lentulus Date: 2009-01-16
Subject: R: [Nova-Roma] Another Nova Roma?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60563 From: philippe cardon Date: 2009-01-16
Subject: Re: Another Nova Roma?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60564 From: Cocceius Spinula Date: 2009-01-16
Subject: Another Nova Roma?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60565 From: Amelie Zapf Date: 2009-01-16
Subject: Introductory posting
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60566 From: L Julia Aquila Date: 2009-01-16
Subject: Re: Introductory posting
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60567 From: L Julia Aquila Date: 2009-01-16
Subject: Re: Another Nova Roma?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60568 From: Gnaeus Caelius Ahenobarbus Date: 2009-01-16
Subject: Re: R: [Nova-Roma] Another Nova Roma?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60569 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2009-01-16
Subject: Re: Introductory posting
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60570 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2009-01-16
Subject: Re: Introductory posting
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60571 From: Cn. Cornelius Lentulus Date: 2009-01-17
Subject: Re: Introductory posting
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60572 From: Amelie Zapf Date: 2009-01-17
Subject: Re: Introductory posting
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60573 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2009-01-17
Subject: Re: Introductory posting
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60574 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2009-01-17
Subject: a.d. XVI kal. Feb. - Aquarius
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60575 From: Complutensis Date: 2009-01-17
Subject: Re: Another Nova Roma?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60576 From: Appius Galerius Aurelianus Date: 2009-01-17
Subject: Re: Another Nova Roma?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60577 From: dan mcelwain Date: 2009-01-18
Subject: Re: R: [Nova-Roma] Another Nova Roma?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60578 From: Gnaeus Caelius Ahenobarbus Date: 2009-01-18
Subject: Average Age Of Cives?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60579 From: Stefn Ullerius Venator Piperbarbus Date: 2009-01-18
Subject: Re: R: [Nova-Roma] Another Nova Roma?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60580 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2009-01-18
Subject: Re: Average Age Of Cives?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60581 From: Stefn Ullerius Venator Piperbarbus Date: 2009-01-18
Subject: Re: Average Age Of Cives?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60582 From: Gnaeus Caelius Ahenobarbus Date: 2009-01-18
Subject: Re: Average Age Of Cives?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60583 From: Charlie Collins Date: 2009-01-18
Subject: Re: R: [Nova-Roma] Another Nova Roma?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60584 From: Lyn Date: 2009-01-18
Subject: Re: R: [Nova-Roma] Another Nova Roma?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60585 From: Colin Brodd Date: 2009-01-18
Subject: returning to internet
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60586 From: Chantal Gaudiano Date: 2009-01-18
Subject: (no subject)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60587 From: Stefn Ullerius Venator Piperbarbus Date: 2009-01-18
Subject: Re: R: [Nova-Roma] Another Nova Roma?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60588 From: Cocceius Spinula Date: 2009-01-18
Subject: Re: Another Nova Roma?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60589 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2009-01-18
Subject: a.d. XV kal. Feb. - Iuno
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60590 From: Amelie Zapf Date: 2009-01-18
Subject: Re: (unknown)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60591 From: Gnaeus Iulius Caesar Date: 2009-01-18
Subject: CURULE AEDILE EDICT 62-02: APPOINTMENT OF SCRIBA
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60592 From: viraj kamath Date: 2009-01-19
Subject: (no subject)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60593 From: CARLOS ALBERTO GUIMARAES CREDE Date: 2009-01-19
Subject: Re: (unknown)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60594 From: Cocceius Spinula Date: 2009-01-19
Subject: Re: Roman Number
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60595 From: yoshiyuki hiramoto Date: 2009-01-19
Subject: Transition of Roman History
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60596 From: Gaius Petronius Dexter Date: 2009-01-19
Subject: Re: Transition of Roman History
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60597 From: Gaius Petronius Dexter Date: 2009-01-19
Subject: Re: (unknown)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60598 From: Q. Valerius Poplicola Date: 2009-01-20
Subject: Re: (unknown)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60599 From: QFabiusMaxmi@aol.com Date: 2009-01-20
Subject: Re: Transition of Roman History
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60600 From: M. Sempronia Pulla Date: 2009-01-20
Subject: Archaeology News
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60601 From: yoshiyuki hiramoto Date: 2009-01-20
Subject: Re: Transition of Roman History
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60602 From: yoshiyuki hiramoto Date: 2009-01-21
Subject: Re: Transition of Roman History
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60603 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2009-01-21
Subject: Edictum Praetorium - Prorogation of edicts
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60604 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2009-01-21
Subject: Edictum Praetorium - Prorogation of edicts
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60605 From: M. Sempronia Pulla Date: 2009-01-21
Subject: Ancient History/Rome Lovers Jokes
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60606 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2009-01-21
Subject: Re: Ancient History/Rome Lovers Jokes
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60607 From: QFabiusMaxmi@aol.com Date: 2009-01-21
Subject: Re: Transition of Roman History
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60608 From: Maxima Valeria Messallina Date: 2009-01-21
Subject: Re: Obituary: Postuma Sempronia Graccha Placidia
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60609 From: Juan A. Garcia-Fuertes Date: 2009-01-21
Subject: Re: Transition of Roman History
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60611 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2009-01-22
Subject: a.d. XI kal. Feb. - the Lyre
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60612 From: phoenixfyre17 Date: 2009-01-22
Subject: Religio Hellenica?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60613 From: dan mcelwain Date: 2009-01-22
Subject: Re: Religio Hellenica?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60614 From: dan mcelwain Date: 2009-01-22
Subject: Re: Religio Hellenica?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60615 From: Numero 2 Date: 2009-01-23
Subject: Re: Religio Hellenica?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60616 From: QFabiusMaxmi@aol.com Date: 2009-01-23
Subject: Re: Transition of Roman History
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60617 From: philippe cardon Date: 2009-01-23
Subject: Re: Transition of Roman History
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60618 From: Lucia Livia Plauta Date: 2009-01-23
Subject: Re: Religio Hellenica?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60619 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2009-01-23
Subject: Re: Religio Hellenica?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60620 From: Daniel M Date: 2009-01-23
Subject: Re: Religio Hellenica?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60621 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2009-01-23
Subject: Re: Religio Hellenica?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60622 From: M•IVL•SEVERVS Date: 2009-01-23
Subject: EDICTVM CONSVLARE V - DE FERIAE SEMENTIVAE
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60623 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2009-01-23
Subject: a.d. X kal. Feb.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60624 From: M•IVL•SEVERVS Date: 2009-01-23
Subject: EDICTVM CONSVLARE V - DE FERIAE SEMENTIVAE
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60625 From: Lucia Livia Plauta Date: 2009-01-23
Subject: Re: Religio Hellenica?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60626 From: Complutensis Date: 2009-01-23
Subject: EDICTUM CONSULARE VI: De creatione accensi
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60627 From: Numero 2 Date: 2009-01-23
Subject: Re: Religio Hellenica?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60628 From: Lucia Livia Plauta Date: 2009-01-23
Subject: Re: Religio Hellenica?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60629 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2009-01-23
Subject: Re: Religio Hellenica?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60630 From: yoshiyuki hiramoto Date: 2009-01-23
Subject: Re: Transition of Roman History
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60631 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2009-01-23
Subject: Re: Religio Hellenica?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60632 From: C. Maria Caeca Date: 2009-01-23
Subject: Re: Religio Hellenica?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60633 From: Ellen Catalina Date: 2009-01-23
Subject: Re: EDICTVM CONSVLARE V - DE FERIAE SEMENTIVAE



Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60457 From: nimrodconjuror Date: 2009-01-10
Subject: Re: Nova Roman Ring
--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Lucia Livia Plauta" <cases@...> wrote:
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Annia Minucia Marcella <annia@>
> wrote:
> >
> Salve Minucia,
> how much could you afford to pay for such a ring?
>
> I don't have anything like that for sale at the moment, but I have
> bronze and brass reproductions of original legionary signet rings,
> one with an eagle, and one with a pegasus. Unfortunately the photos
> are on my home computer 1100 kms away from where I am now, but I
> might be able to dig them out of my Gmail account if anyone's
> interested. The inside diametre is 2 cms for the pegasus, and 19 mm
> for the eagle one.
> I sell the brass reproductions for 10 euros, and the bronze ones for
> 15.
> When I go back to Budapest in february I can have some made in
> silver, if anyone is interested. The rings are heavy, but the final
> sale price should still be well under 50 dollars.
>
> Optime vale,
> Livia
>
> > Salve,
> >
> > It looks pretty awesome. Too bad I can't afford it.
> >
> > Vale
> > - Annia Minucia Marcella
> >
> > http://minucia.ciarin.com
> >
> >
> >
> > Gallagher wrote:
> > >
> > > Salvete Nova Romans
> > >
> > > Just a reminder that you can buy a very nice ring to commemorate
> your
> > > citizenship and love
> > > of all things Roman.
> > >
> > > http://www.carrollcollection.com/SPQR_Ring.htm
> > > <http://www.carrollcollection.com/SPQR_Ring.htm>
> > >
> > > I wear mine everywhere!!!
> > >
> > > Valete
> > >
> > > Tiberius Galerius Paulinus
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
>

Salve Livae,

How would one go about ordering one of the brass or bronze legionary
signet rings you mention? Are they available for sale online, or are
they custom made?

Optime Vale

Lucius Aquillius Albinus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60458 From: M. Lucretius Agricola Date: 2009-01-10
Subject: Re: Nova Roman Ring
--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Gallagher <spqr753@...> wrote:
>
>
>
> Salvete Nova Romans
>
> Just a reminder that you can buy a very nice ring to commemorate
your citizenship and love
> of all things Roman.
>
> http://www.carrollcollection.com/SPQR_Ring.htm
>
> I wear mine everywhere!!!
>
> Valete
>
> Tiberius Galerius Paulinus
>

I do the same with mine. It is a really beautiful ring and very well
made. If there is enough interest, why not see if there is the
possibility to get a discount on a bulk purchase? A buying group could
be set up.


MLA
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60459 From: Cocceius Spinula Date: 2009-01-10
Subject: S·T·T·L: Postuma Sempronia Graccha Placidia
Avete,

As Romans did,  the same shall we:

S·T·T·L Postuma Sempronia Graccha Placidia

Valete,
C. Cocceius Spinula
Provincia Hispania, Lusitania
Accensus Consulum et Procurator Regionis Lusitaniae




P.S.: S·T·T·L - Sit tibi terra leuis* (Latim for "May the earth rest lightly on you")
*leuis > levis

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60460 From: Tiberius Horatius Barbatus Date: 2009-01-11
Subject: Re: Nova Roman Ring
Salve Plauta,
I would be very interested in your rings. Please contact me off line with any pictures you
have when you get the change.

Gratias

Vale

Barbatus
--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Lucia Livia Plauta" <cases@...> wrote:
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Annia Minucia Marcella <annia@>
> wrote:
> >
> Salve Minucia,
> how much could you afford to pay for such a ring?
>
> I don't have anything like that for sale at the moment, but I have
> bronze and brass reproductions of original legionary signet rings,
> one with an eagle, and one with a pegasus. Unfortunately the photos
> are on my home computer 1100 kms away from where I am now, but I
> might be able to dig them out of my Gmail account if anyone's
> interested. The inside diametre is 2 cms for the pegasus, and 19 mm
> for the eagle one.
> I sell the brass reproductions for 10 euros, and the bronze ones for
> 15.
> When I go back to Budapest in february I can have some made in
> silver, if anyone is interested. The rings are heavy, but the final
> sale price should still be well under 50 dollars.
>
> Optime vale,
> Livia
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60461 From: Stefn Ullerius Venator Piperbarbus Date: 2009-01-11
Subject: Possible name change...thoughts
Avete Omnes;

My wife Annia Uleria and I are considering a change of names to better
reflect proper Roman Usage.

I have been having private discussions with some folk of my
acquaintance about this.

Looking at the information gained, a name struck A Ulleria's fancy as
being more properly Roman, in light of the advice we've received:

Mania Annia Megas Machinatrix (Praenomen being the feminine of Manius,
Nomen being the feminine of Annius, Cognomen being the Romanized Greek
of her actual family name [Megas] and Machinatrix coming from her
education and experience as an engineer).

For myself, Publius Ullerius Stephanus Venator...preserving much of my
current name, with a proper Roman praenomen.

Piperbarbatus (Piperbarbus) going away because, frankly, my beard is
so much more salt than pepper these days ,-)

If we do decide to change, the request goes to the Censors?

=========================================
In amicitia et fides -
Stephanus Ullerius Venator Piperbarbatus
Senator et Lictor
Civis circa Quintilis MMDCCLI a.u.c.
Patrician, Paterfamilias
Religio Septentrionalis - Poeta

Dominus Sodalitas Coquuorum et Cerevisiae Coctorum
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Sodalis_Coq_et_Coq/

http://www.myspace.com/venator_poetus
http://anheathenreader.blogspot.com/
http://www.catamount-grange-hearth.org/
http://www.cafepress.com/catamountgrange
--
May the Holy Powers smile on our efforts.
May the Spirits of our family lines nod in approval.
May we be of Worth to our fellow Nova Romans.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60462 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2009-01-11
Subject: Re: Possible name change...thoughts
Re: [Nova-Roma] Possible name change...thoughts

 A. Tullia Scholastica Stephano Ullerio Venatori quiritibus bonae voluntatis S.P.D.

Avete Omnes;

My wife Annia Uleria and I are considering a change of names to better
reflect proper Roman Usage.

    ATS:  I had gotten wind of something of this sort.  I congratulate you on your efforts in this direction.  

I have been having private discussions with some folk of my
acquaintance about this.

Looking at the information gained, a name struck A Ulleria's fancy as
being more properly Roman, in light of the advice we've received:

Mania Annia Megas Machinatrix (Praenomen being the feminine of Manius,
Nomen being the feminine of Annius, Cognomen being the Romanized Greek
of her actual family name [Megas] and Machinatrix coming from her
education and experience as an engineer).

    ATS:  We do try to stick with three rather than four names as a rule, but some have taken two cognomina/cognomen+ agnomen.  To my ears, this one does not have a good ring; Mania and Annia sound too sing-song for the Roman ear.  Even Mania and Annaea would likely strike the Roman ear better, for the medial vocalization was different.  

For myself, Publius Ullerius Stephanus Venator...preserving much of my
current name, with a proper Roman praenomen.

    ATS:  This sounds good to me, though typical practice would be to choose either Stephanus or Venator.  Almost certainly this can be accommodated as is, however.

Piperbarbatus (Piperbarbus) going away because, frankly, my beard is
so much more salt than pepper these days ,-)

    ATS:  And piper can also be red...though the Romans may not have known about those.  They may have known about white pepper, however.  You’re the expert on Roman dining...inasmuch as there is a Latin word for pepper, I assume they did know about at least one variety thereof.    

If we do decide to change, the request goes to the Censors?

    ATS:  Yes, and the rogatores can forward these, too.  I think all concerned parties are on this list.  

=========================================
In amicitia et fides -
Stephanus Ullerius Venator Piperbarbatus
Senator et Lictor
Civis circa Quintilis MMDCCLI a.u.c.
Patrician, Paterfamilias
Religio Septentrionalis - Poeta

Dominus Sodalitas Coquuorum et Cerevisiae Coctorum
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Sodalis_Coq_et_Coq/

http://www.myspace.com/venator_poetus
http://anheathenreader.blogspot.com/
http://www.catamount-grange-hearth.org/
http://www.cafepress.com/catamountgrange


Vale, et valete.  

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60463 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2009-01-11
Subject: Re: Obituary: Postuma Sempronia Graccha Placidia
Re: [Nova-Roma] Obituary: Postuma Sempronia Graccha Placidia
A. Tullia Scholastica Cn.  Cornelio Lentulo quiritibus bonae voluntatis S.P.D.
 

FROM THE CENSORIAL OFFICE

Cn. Lentulus scriba censorius, pontifex, Quiritibus s. p. d.

It is my sad duty to inform you, Quirites, that our fellow citizen

Postuma Sempronia Graccha Placidia

of Provincia Britannia, passed away. We offer our condolences to her friends and family. We keep her memory with us.

Rest in peace!

D. M.

    ATS:  I was sorry to learn (a bit earlier) of Placidia’s passing, though it was not entirely unexpected from what I had known about her some time ago.  She was with me in the original run of Avitus’ Assimil class, later to be known as Sermo Latinus (combined), but left due to incompatibilities with our difficult instructor.  I had had some personal correspondence with her, and knew she was seriously ill.   One can hope to overcome even the worst nature can bring, but it was not to be.      

    My sincere condolences to her family and friends.  STTL, et requiescas in pace, Placidia, fautrix linguae Latinae.  

Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus,
P O N T I F E X
SCRIBA CENSORIUS

 Vale, et valete.  
      
   Messages in this topic           <http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma/message/60446
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60464 From: Gaius Petronius Dexter Date: 2009-01-11
Subject: Re: Obituary: Postuma Sempronia Graccha Placidia
C. Petronius A. Tulliae Scholasticae S.P.D.,

> > ATS: I was sorry to learn (a bit earlier) of Placidia¹s
passing, though
> > it was not entirely unexpected from what I had known about her
some time ago.
> > She was with me in the original run of Avitus¹ Assimil class,
later to be
> > known as Sermo Latinus (combined), but left due to
incompatibilities with our
> > difficult instructor. I had had some personal correspondence
with her, and
> > knew she was seriously ill. One can hope to overcome even the
worst nature
> > can bring, but it was not to be.

Perhaps my idea is not good, but because we have a civium album, I
wonder if we can have on our website a place for our civis which pass
into a current year, with our public prayers and the testimony as you
do above on Placidia?

Optime vale.

C. Petronius Dexter
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60465 From: Cn. Cornelius Lentulus Date: 2009-01-11
Subject: Re: Possible name change...thoughts
Lentulus Tulliae et Venatori sal.


Venator: >>> My wife Annia Uleria and I are considering a change of names to better
reflect proper Roman Usage<<<


Tullia: >>> I had gotten wind of something of this sort.  I congratulate you on your efforts in this direction. <<<


I, too, do congratulate! Venator and Machinatrix should be an example for all those who have "strange" names in Nova Roma! They are, however, fewer and fewer. They are among our oldest citizens, because since 5 years we have to clear onomastic policy that secures that newcomers take absolutely correct classic Roman names. This is both a way to honour our ancestors and a necessary element of taking Roman citizenship because in the ancient times a foreigner who wanted to get Roman citizenship was in the same time taking a Roman name.


Tullia:  >>> We do try to stick with three rather than four names as a rule, but some have taken two cognomina/cognomen+ agnomen. <<<


Yes, you are right, but older citizens with strange names who want to Romanize their name are an example from that rule. We want to let them feel most comfortable with their new name, so we try to keep the most part of their old name while rearranging it in a classical Roman form. Also, it was not too rare for noble Romans to have 4 or 5 names, or even more, right in the early and middle republican period. And a second cognomen is not definitely an agnomen.


Tullia: >>> To my ears, this one does not have a good ring; Mania and Annia sound too sing-song for the Roman ear.  Even Mania and Annaea would likely strike the Roman ear better, for the medial vocalization was different. <<<


It is up to Machinatrix to decide it whether she likes this ring or not, it's not our business. "Mania Annia" sounds not quite good to my ear, either, but it doesn't have to reflect to our preferences, but to that of the owner. I don't see really any problem in this name, however. Perhaps instead of Mania she will want another praenomen, but I like it as it is.


Tullia:  >>> This sounds good to me, though typical practice would be to choose either Stephanus or Venator.  Almost certainly this can be accommodated as is, however. <<<


I think it is a good practice to have the most possible elements of the old names being incorporated to the new name, so that we can keep the identity of the person.

I encourage those who don't have the classical Roman name structure to follow the example this nice couple, wife Machinatrix and husband Venator.

Curate, ut valeatis!

LENTVLVS

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60466 From: Publius Memmius Albucius Date: 2009-01-11
Subject: Re: Obituary and web site
Petronio s.d.

Excellent idea. I think that our Collegium Pontificum, like every
other Power or magistracy, can open pages in our web site.

Such a "dis manibus" page could be a part of them.

In this case, the CP could act in due collaboration with the
censorship.

Vale,


P. Memmius Albucius



--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Gaius Petronius Dexter"
<jfarnoud94@...> wrote:
>
> C. Petronius A. Tulliae Scholasticae S.P.D.,
>
> > > ATS: I was sorry to learn (a bit earlier) of Placidia¹s
> passing, though
> > > it was not entirely unexpected from what I had known about her
> some time ago.
> > > She was with me in the original run of Avitus¹ Assimil class,
> later to be
> > > known as Sermo Latinus (combined), but left due to
> incompatibilities with our
> > > difficult instructor. I had had some personal correspondence
> with her, and
> > > knew she was seriously ill. One can hope to overcome even the
> worst nature
> > > can bring, but it was not to be.
>
> Perhaps my idea is not good, but because we have a civium album, I
> wonder if we can have on our website a place for our civis which
pass
> into a current year, with our public prayers and the testimony as
you
> do above on Placidia?
>
> Optime vale.
>
> C. Petronius Dexter
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60467 From: Cn. Cornelius Lentulus Date: 2009-01-11
Subject: R: [Nova-Roma] Re: Obituary and web site

Lentulus Petronio et Memmio sal.

There is a similar page:

http://novaroma.org/nr/Category:Deceased_citizens




--- Dom 11/1/09, Publius Memmius Albucius <albucius_aoe@...> ha scritto:
Da: Publius Memmius Albucius <albucius_aoe@...>
Oggetto: [Nova-Roma] Re: Obituary and web site
A: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Data: Domenica 11 gennaio 2009, 11:21

Petronio s.d.

Excellent idea. I think that our Collegium Pontificum, like every
other Power or magistracy, can open pages in our web site.

Such a "dis manibus" page could be a part of them.

In this case, the CP could act in due collaboration with the
censorship.

Vale,

P. Memmius Albucius

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com, "Gaius Petronius Dexter"
<jfarnoud94@ ...> wrote:
>
> C. Petronius A. Tulliae Scholasticae S.P.D.,
>
> > > ATS: I was sorry to learn (a bit earlier) of Placidia¹s
> passing, though
> > > it was not entirely unexpected from what I had known about her
> some time ago.
> > > She was with me in the original run of Avitus¹ Assimil class,
> later to be
> > > known as Sermo Latinus (combined), but left due to
> incompatibilities with our
> > > difficult instructor. I had had some personal correspondence
> with her, and
> > > knew she was seriously ill. One can hope to overcome even the
> worst nature
> > > can bring, but it was not to be.
>
> Perhaps my idea is not good, but because we have a civium album, I
> wonder if we can have on our website a place for our civis which
pass
> into a current year, with our public prayers and the testimony as
you
> do above on Placidia?
>
> Optime vale.
>
> C. Petronius Dexter
>


Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60468 From: Gaius Petronius Dexter Date: 2009-01-11
Subject: Re: Possible name change...thoughts
C. Petronius

> My wife Annia Uleria and I are considering a change of names to
better
> reflect proper Roman Usage.

Yes it is a good thing. The Roman wife did not wear the gentilicium
name of her husband, except if they are cousins or of the same gens.

The woman always keeps the name of her father at the feminine
declension. Terentia was the wife of Tullius Cicero and their
daughter was named Tullia. When Tullia married Sempronius Piso, she
always was Tullia, and so when later she married Cornelius Dolabella.

> Looking at the information gained, a name struck A Ulleria's fancy
as
> being more properly Roman, in light of the advice we've received:
>
> Mania Annia Megas Machinatrix (Praenomen being the feminine of
Manius,
> Nomen being the feminine of Annius, Cognomen being the Romanized
Greek
> of her actual family name [Megas] and Machinatrix coming from her
> education and experience as an engineer).

Warning: Machinatrix seldom has this meaning in Latin. A machinatrix,
is rather an intriguing or scheming woman.


Optime vale.

C. Petronius Dexter
Flamen Portunalis
Quaestor praetorianus Cn. Equitii Marini.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60469 From: Cn. Cornelius Lentulus Date: 2009-01-11
Subject: Invitation to Our All Latin Mailing List
Citizens and foreigners who love Latin!


- Novum forum adhuc privatum mox publicum Novae Romae Latinum vobis creatum est! Lingua tantum Latina ibi adhibetur.

ENG.: There is a new all Latin mailing list where you can exercise your Latin without being blamed for your mistakes, where you can feel totally Roman.

- Omnes vos quaeso huc veniatis, Latinitatem Novae Romae hic colatis:

ENG.: I ask you to subscribe to this list to promote the Latinity of Nova Roma, to demonstrate to the world that we are true Romans using Latin and that the Latin language is NOT DEAD:

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma-Latina/

- Vos jam multi expectamus vivá delectati linguae Latinae voluptate. Venite vos quoque apud nos: majora fortiora facta apud nos fiunt! :-)

ENG.: We are waiting for you. Join us to enjoy living Latin together: it's gonna be legendary! :-)



Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus,
P O N T I F E X
SACERDOS CONCORDIAE
------------------------------------------
Legatus Pro Praetore Provinciae Pannoniae
Sacerdos Provinciae Pannoniae
Interpres Linguae Hungaricae
Accensus Consulum M. Curiatii Complutensis et M. Iulii Severi
Scriba Praetoris P. Memmii Albucii
Scriba Censorum Ti. Galerii Paulini et C. Popillii Laenatis
Scriba Interpretis Linguae Latinae A. Tulliae Scholasticae
-------------------------------------------
Magister Sodalitatis Latinitatis
Dominus Factionis Russatae
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60470 From: Gaius Petronius Dexter Date: 2009-01-11
Subject: Re: Invitation to Our All Latin Mailing List
C. Petronius Cn. Lentulo suo s.p.d.,


> ENG.: I ask you to subscribe to this list to promote the Latinity
of Nova Roma, to demonstrate to the world that we are true Romans
using Latin and that the Latin language is NOT DEAD:<

Did you read the book of the German Wilfried Stroh :
Latein ist tot, es lebe Latein.

Translated in French by Sylvain Bluntz : Le latin est mort, vive le
latin! (This title is a parody of the sentence said at the dead of
French king to salute his successor:
Le roi est mort, vive le roi!)

In his book Stroh shows us that the Latin is dead since Cicero and
Vergil, and is always reborn through the generations, in saecula
saeculorum.

Of course, he makes the difference between the spoken Latin which
became all the roman languages changing with the times with the
eternal written Latin.

For example, the medieval French people had spoken a French language
that the modern French people can not understand, but the same
medieval French people had written in the same Latin that use modern
French Latin writers. So it is the evidence that the Latin is dead
but always living.

This book is odd and funny but very interesting.

As the German poet Josef Eberle said:
O quoties obitum linguae statuere Latinae!
Tot tamen exequiis salua superstes erat.

Optime vale.

C. Petronius Dexter
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60471 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2009-01-11
Subject: a.d. III Eid. Ian. - The Carmentalia
OSD C. Equitius Cato

Salvete omnes!

Hodiernus dies est ante diem III Eidus Ianuarius; haec dies nefastus
publicus est.

"Then stretching out her arm to the right bank,
She stamped three times, wildly, on the pine deck:
Evander barely held her back with his hand,
Barely stopped her leaping swiftly to land.
`Hail, you gods of the land we sought' she cried,
`And you the place that will give heaven new gods,
And you nymphs of the grove, and crowds of Naiads!
May the sight of you be a good omen for me and my son,
And happy be the foot that touches that shore!
Am I wrong, or will those hills raise mighty walls,
And from this earth all the earth receive its laws?
The whole world is one day promised to these hills:
Who could believe the place held such fate in store?
Soon Trojan ships will touch these shores,
And a woman, Lavinia, shall cause fresh war.
Pallas, dear grandson, why put on that fatal armour?
Put it on! No mean champion will avenge you.
Conquered Troy you will conquer, and rise from your fall,
Your very ruin overwhelms your enemy's houses.
Conquering flames consume Neptune's Ilium!
Will that prevent its ashes rising higher than the world?
Soon pious Aeneas will bring the sacred Penates, and his
Sacred father here: Vesta, receive the gods of Troy!" ...
But the felicitous prophetess, as she lived beloved of the gods,
Now a goddess herself, has this day of Janus' month as hers. - Ovid,
"Fasti" I: The Carmentalia

"Of this goddess little is said in historical times, when the
primitive Latin worship was obscured by a crowd of Grecian and
Oriental deities; but she must have held a leading place in early
times, for she had a special priest, the Flamen Carmentalis, and the
gate near which her altar stood just at the foot of the Capitoline,
between it and the river, was called Carmentalis. Plutarch says that
some supposed Carmenta to be one of the Fates who presided over the
birth of men. The Greek title of the goddess was Themis. Into her
chapel it was not permitted to carry any part of a dead animal, for
example, anything made of leather. It is related that the famous
Marcus Popillius, in the time of the Samnite wars, the first plebeian
who ever obtained the honor of a triumph, was flamen of Carmentis.
When one day he was performing a sacrifice, clad in the laena, or
priestly robe, a tumult arose in the city. Popillius then hastily left
the sacrifice, clad as he was, made his way to the assembly, and
calmed the tumult by his authority and eloquence. In memory of this,
from the loena or robe which he wore, the people gave him the name of
Laenas, which was borne by his descendants; for it was quite out of
order to address the people in any robe but the toga, the distinctive
costume of a Roman citizen." - William S. Walsh, "Curiosities of
Popular Customs And of Rites, Ceremonies, Observances, and
Miscellaneous Antiquities" (1925)

Today is the celebration of the Carmentalia, celebrated in honor of
the nymph Carmenta or Carmentis, the mother of Evander. Upon reaching
Latium with her son, she climbed atop a hill and began prophesying
and singing. This festival is celebrated annually on the 11th and the
15th of January, and no other particulars of it are recorded except
that Carmenta was invoked in it as "Postvorta" and "Antevorta",
epithets which had reference to her power of looking back into the
past and forward into the future. Her name comes from the
word "carmen" or "song"; she is said to have invented both the sacred
music of the Romans and the 15-letter alphabet.


"Quitting his couch, Tithonus' bride will witness
The high priest's rite of Arcadian Carmentis.
The same light received you too, Juturna, Turnus' sister,
There where the Aqua Virgo circles the Campus.
Where shall I find the cause and nature of these rites?
Who will steer my vessel in mid-ocean? - Ovid, "Fasti" I; 11 January

Today is also the celebration of the Iuturnalia, in honor of the
goddess Iuturna, in a festival celebrated on the anniversary of the
day on which her temple was erected in the Campus Martius (Field of
Mars, where soldiers trained, a place dedicated to the Roman god of
war, Mars) by Quintus Lutatius Catulus, a great-great-great uncle of
Julius Caesar.

Iuturna is the goddess of fountains, wells, and springs, and the
nymph of the fountain in Latium famous for its reputed healing
powers. She was a sister of Turnus and supported him against
Aeneas. Turnus had been seeking the hand of Lavinia, daughter of
Latinus, the king of the Latins. Iuno, who hated the Trojans,
prompted Turnus to foment war between the Latins and the Trojans, and
although Latinus wsn't happy about it, he allowed Turnus to go to
war. Iuppiter later turned Iuturna into a nymph and gave her a sacred
well in Lavinium in Latium, as well as another one near the temple to
Vesta in the Forum Romanum. The second well was called Lacus
Iuturnae, and was reputed to be the well at which the Dioscuri
refreshed their horses on the way to announce the victory at the
Battle of Lake Regillus (496 B.C.).

On a side note, Iuturna and Iuppiter had an affair that Iuppiter
wanted to keep under wraps from Iuno, for obvious reasons.
Unfortunately, one of Iuturna's closest companions was the nymph
Larunda, whose one great personal characteristic was her inability to
shut up. She inadvertantly gave away Iuppiter's secret, and in anger
he cut out her tongue and banished her to watch over the Avernus
River at the mouth of the Underworld. Mercury, charged with
escorting her there, fell in love with her and as a result of their
brief but fruitful adventure she gave birth to the two Lares, the
household gods.


Valete bene!

Cato
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60472 From: deciusiunius Date: 2009-01-11
Subject: Re: Nova Roman Ring
--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Gallagher <spqr753@...> wrote:
>
>
>
> Salvete Nova Romans
>
> Just a reminder that you can buy a very nice ring to commemorate
>your citizenship and love
> of all things Roman.


Salve Pauline,

I've seen them (you showed me yours in Maryland at the Napoleonic
reenactment in Maryland in October), they *are* nice looking rings but
even the sterling ones are pretty pricey and the gold, well...

Vale,

Palladius

>
> http://www.carrollcollection.com/SPQR_Ring.htm
>
> I wear mine everywhere!!!
>
> Valete
>
> Tiberius Galerius Paulinus
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60473 From: Bruno Cantermi Date: 2009-01-11
Subject: Re: Possible name change...thoughts
Salve Venator!
 
When I entered college, I asked the censors to give me a Cognomen related to my academic achievement, but I wasn't given answer. I can you help me?
 
Vale,
 
LVSITANVS.SPD.
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Sunday, January 11, 2009 3:09 AM
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Possible name change...thoughts

Avete Omnes;

My wife Annia Uleria and I are considering a change of names to better
reflect proper Roman Usage.

I have been having private discussions with some folk of my
acquaintance about this.

Looking at the information gained, a name struck A Ulleria's fancy as
being more properly Roman, in light of the advice we've received:

Mania Annia Megas Machinatrix (Praenomen being the feminine of Manius,
Nomen being the feminine of Annius, Cognomen being the Romanized Greek
of her actual family name [Megas] and Machinatrix coming from her
education and experience as an engineer).

For myself, Publius Ullerius Stephanus Venator...preservin g much of my
current name, with a proper Roman praenomen.

Piperbarbatus (Piperbarbus) going away because, frankly, my beard is
so much more salt than pepper these days ,-)

If we do decide to change, the request goes to the Censors?

============ ========= ========= ========= ==
In amicitia et fides -
Stephanus Ullerius Venator Piperbarbatus
Senator et Lictor
Civis circa Quintilis MMDCCLI a.u.c.
Patrician, Paterfamilias
Religio Septentrionalis - Poeta

Dominus Sodalitas Coquuorum et Cerevisiae Coctorum
http://groups. yahoo.com/ group/Sodalis_ Coq_et_Coq/

http://www.myspace. com/venator_ poetus
http://anheathenrea der.blogspot. com/
http://www.catamoun t-grange- hearth.org/
http://www.cafepres s.com/catamountg range
--
May the Holy Powers smile on our efforts.
May the Spirits of our family lines nod in approval.
May we be of Worth to our fellow Nova Romans.



__________ NOD32 3756 (20090110) Information __________

This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system.
http://www.eset.com
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60474 From: Gallagher Date: 2009-01-11
Subject: Re: Nova Roman Ring
Salve Palladius
 
This just goes to show how Nova Romans "never miss an opportunity to miss an opportunity" *
 
Years ago when this ring was in the planning stages the jeweler agreed to give Nova Romans
a special price. We had to have a minimum number of orders before we could get the
price. We never came close to reaching it.
 
At that time the cost of the silver ring, like mine, cost HALF, of what it does today.
 
If we had a serious number interested in the ring today we might be able to get a reduced
price. Before we ask we would need to see how many would really want one.
 
Vale
 
Paulinus
 
* is was that the Palestinians??
 




To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
From: bcatfd@...
Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 15:19:22 +0000
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Nova Roman Ring


--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com, Gallagher <spqr753@... > wrote:
>
>
>
> Salvete Nova Romans
>
> Just a reminder that you can buy a very nice ring to commemorate
>your citizenship and love
> of all things Roman.

Salve Pauline,

I've seen them (you showed me yours in Maryland at the Napoleonic
reenactment in Maryland in October), they *are* nice looking rings but
even the sterling ones are pretty pricey and the gold, well...

Vale,

Palladius

>
> http://www.carrollc ollection. com/SPQR_ Ring.htm
>
> I wear mine everywhere!! !
>
> Valete
>
> Tiberius Galerius Paulinus
>


Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60475 From: Stefn Ullerius Venator Piperbarbus Date: 2009-01-11
Subject: Re: Possible name change...thoughts
Ave Lusitanus;

On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 9:02 AM, Bruno Cantermi wrote:
> Salve Venator!
>
> When I entered college, I asked the censors to give me a Cognomen related to
> my academic achievement, but I wasn't given answer. I can you help me?
>
> Vale,
>
> LVSITANVS.SPD.
>

As I depend upon others for hammering out what Latin I use, I must
defer to those men and women on this list who rescue me.

I should hope that by asking me, you will receive their assistance,
and further this thread on good, Roman naming practices.

=========================================
In amicitia et fides -
Stephanus Ullerius Venator Piperbarbatus
Civis circa Quintilis MMDCCLI a.u.c.
Senator et Lictor
Patrician et Paterfamilias

Religio Septentrionalis - Poeta

Dominus Sodalitas Coquuorum et Cerevisiae Coctorum
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Sodalis_Coq_et_Coq/

http://www.myspace.com/venator_poetus
http://anheathenreader.blogspot.com/
http://www.catamount-grange-hearth.org/
http://www.cafepress.com/catamountgrange
--
May the Holy Powers smile on our efforts.
May the Spirits of our family lines nod in approval.
May we be of Worth to our fellow Nova Romans.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60476 From: Stefn Ullerius Venator Piperbarbus Date: 2009-01-11
Subject: Re: Possible name change...thoughts
Salve Scholastica;

On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 1:29 AM, A. Tullia Scholastica wrote:
>
> A. Tullia Scholastica Stephano Ullerio Venatori quiritibus bonae voluntatis
> S.P.D.
>
> ATS: I had gotten wind of something of this sort. I congratulate you
> on your efforts in this direction.
>

Venii: Thank you, I guess the Elderly Canine can mend his ways, at
least a little ,-)

>
> ATS: We do try to stick with three rather than four names as a rule,
> but some have taken two cognomina/cognomen+ agnomen. To my ears, this one
> does not have a good ring; Mania and Annia sound too sing-song for the Roman
> ear. Even Mania and Annaea would likely strike the Roman ear better, for
> the medial vocalization was different.
>

Venii: I spoke with my wife about this. She is her parents' first born
(and is of prime importance to me), so:

Prima Annia Megas Machinatrix

>> For myself, Publius Ullerius Stephanus Venator...

>
> ATS: This sounds good to me, though typical practice would be to choose
> either Stephanus or Venator. Almost certainly this can be accommodated as
> is, however.
>

Venii: I have grown accustomed to having an overly long name 8-)

>
> ATS: And piper can also be red...though the Romans may not have known
> about those. They may have known about white pepper, however. You're the
> expert on Roman dining...inasmuch as there is a Latin word for pepper, I
> assume they did know about at least one variety thereof.

Venii: From my research, Piper Nigrum was well known and valued in
Ancient Times; white pepper and black pepper being two different
preparations of the same seed, as are green and red peppecorns.
Though, the green are much more a modern innovation.

>
>> If we do decide to change, the request goes to the Censors?
>
> ATS: Yes, and the rogatores can forward these, too. I think all
> concerned parties are on this list.
>

Ok, once my wife and I are satisfied, we shall make a formal
presentation of our request.

=========================================
In amicitia et fides -
Stephanus Ullerius Venator Piperbarbatus pro tem ,-)
Civis circa Quintilis MMDCCLI a.u.c.
Senator et et Lictor
Patrician et Paterfamilias

Religio Septentrionalis - Poeta

Dominus Sodalitas Coquuorum et Cerevisiae Coctorum
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Sodalis_Coq_et_Coq/

http://www.myspace.com/venator_poetus
http://anheathenreader.blogspot.com/
http://www.catamount-grange-hearth.org/
http://www.cafepress.com/catamountgrange
--
May the Holy Powers smile on our efforts.
May the Spirits of our family lines nod in approval.
May we be of Worth to our fellow Nova Romans.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60477 From: Stefn Ullerius Venator Piperbarbus Date: 2009-01-11
Subject: Re: Possible name change...thoughts
Ave Dexter;

On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 5:41 AM, Gaius Petronius Dexter wrote:
> C. Petronius
>
> Yes it is a good thing. The Roman wife did not wear the gentilicium
> name of her husband, except if they are cousins or of the same gens.
>
> The woman always keeps the name of her father at the feminine
> declension. Terentia was the wife of Tullius Cicero and their
> daughter was named Tullia. When Tullia married Sempronius Piso, she
> always was Tullia, and so when later she married Cornelius Dolabella.

Venii: Thank you for adding to the conversation. This is one of the
points raised in my other conversation as well. The examples help to
clarify the point.

>
> Warning: Machinatrix seldom has this meaning in Latin. A machinatrix,
> is rather an intriguing or scheming woman.
>
> Optime vale.
>
> C. Petronius Dexter
> Flamen Portunalis
> Quaestor praetorianus Cn. Equitii Marini.
>

Ah, I see, similar root to the word machinations?

I cracked open my English-Latin dictionary.

What would be the proper form of Faber to replace Machinatrix?
And, do I understand correctly that Faber is a proper term for an
engineer or artificer?

=================================
In amicitia et fide
Stephanus Ullerius Venator Piperbarbatus (pro tem)
Civis circa Quintilis MMDCCLI a.u.c.
Senator et Lictor
Patrician et Paterfamilias

Religio Septentrionalis - Poeta

Dominus Sodalitas Coquuorum et Cerevisiae Coctorum
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Sodalis_Coq_et_Coq/

http://www.myspace.com/venator_poetus
http://anheathenreader.blogspot.com/
http://www.catamount-grange-hearth.org/
http://www.cafepress.com/catamountgrange
--
May the Holy Powers smile on our efforts.
May the Spirits of our family lines nod in approval.
May we be of Worth to our fellow Nova Romans.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60478 From: Cn. Cornelius Lentulus Date: 2009-01-11
Subject: Re: Possible name change...thoughts
Lentulus Venatori Piperbarbo sal.


>>> Ah, I see, similar root to the word machinations? <<<


Yes, as you say. But "machinatrix" does mean "engeneer", too. What our Caligula (C. Petronius Dexter) said was that machinatrix has a bad connotation too, but not only. The first meaning of "machinatrix" is "a woman working with machines".


>>> What would be the proper form of Faber to replace Machinatrix? <<<


It is not encourage to change a name that works quite well. In my view there is no reason to replace "Machinatrix" that served well 9 years. She would loss her identity in a totally changed name.


>>> And, do I understand correctly that Faber is a proper term for an
engineer or artificer? <<<


"Faber" is simply "smith". I don't recommend this name for her.

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60479 From: Stefn Ullerius Venator Piperbarbus Date: 2009-01-11
Subject: Re: Possible name change...thoughts
Saul et fortuna Lentulus;

On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 4:14 AM, Cn. Cornelius Lentulus wrote:
> Lentulus Tulliae et Venatori sal.
>
> I, too, do congratulate! Venator and Machinatrix should be an example for
> all those who have "strange" names in Nova Roma! They are, however, fewer
> and fewer. They are among our oldest citizens, because since 5 years we have
> to clear onomastic policy that secures that newcomers take absolutely
> correct classic Roman names. This is both a way to honour our ancestors and
> a necessary element of taking Roman citizenship because in the ancient times
> a foreigner who wanted to get Roman citizenship was in the same time taking
> a Roman name.
>

Venii: Thank you, too. We have always been a little different than
the neighbors ,-)
We are grateful for the advice we have received in both proper naming
usage and in methods to preserve some of the "foreignness" of our
names.

> Tullia: >>> We do try to stick with three rather than four names as a rule,
> but some have taken two cognomina/cognomen+ agnomen. <<<
>
>
> Yes, you are right, but older citizens with strange names who want to
> Romanize their name are an example from that rule. We want to let them feel
> most comfortable with their new name, so we try to keep the most part of
> their old name while rearranging it in a classical Roman form. Also, it was
> not too rare for noble Romans to have 4 or 5 names, or even more, right in
> the early and middle republican period. And a second cognomen is not
> definitely an agnomen.
>

Venii: Again, good information on the mechanism of proper naming, and
Roman tolerance for some innovation. Nobilitas of spirit is something
to which we should all strive; to become noble men, not necessarily
Noblemen.

>
> It is up to Machinatrix to decide it whether she likes this ring or not,
> it's not our business. "Mania Annia" sounds not quite good to my ear,
> either, but it doesn't have to reflect to our preferences, but to that of
> the owner. I don't see really any problem in this name, however. Perhaps
> instead of Mania she will want another praenomen, but I like it as it is.
>

Venii: My wife and I did discuss this and on further consideration it
did sound a bit like a chant instead of a name. She decided to use
Prima as her praenomen.

>
> I think it is a good practice to have the most possible elements of the old
> names being incorporated to the new name, so that we can keep the identity
> of the person.
>
> I encourage those who don't have the classical Roman name structure to
> follow the example this nice couple, wife Machinatrix and husband Venator.
>
> Curate, ut valeatis!
>
> LENTVLVS
>

Thank you again Lentulus and all who have been of assistance in this
small, but personally important, endeavor.

=========================================
In amicitia et fide
Stephanus Ullerius Venator Piperbarbatus (pro tem)
Civis circa Quintilis MMDCCLI a.u.c.
Senator et Lictor
Patrician et Paterfamilias

Religio Septentrionalis - Poeta

Dominus Sodalitas Coquuorum et Cerevisiae Coctorum
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Sodalis_Coq_et_Coq/

http://www.myspace.com/venator_poetus
http://anheathenreader.blogspot.com/
http://www.catamount-grange-hearth.org/
http://www.cafepress.com/catamountgrange
--
May the Holy Powers smile on our efforts.
May the Spirits of our family lines nod in approval.
May we be of Worth to our fellow Nova Romans.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60480 From: Stefn Ullerius Venator Piperbarbus Date: 2009-01-11
Subject: Re: Possible name change...thoughts
Ave Lentulus;

On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 10:34 AM, Cn. Cornelius Lentulus
<cn_corn_lent@...> wrote:
> Lentulus Venatori Piperbarbo sal.
>
>>>> Ah, I see, similar root to the word machinations? <<<
>
> Yes, as you say. But "machinatrix" does mean "engeneer", too. What our
> Caligula (C. Petronius Dexter) said was that machinatrix has a bad
> connotation too, but not only. The first meaning of "machinatrix" is "a
> woman working with machines".
>
>>>> What would be the proper form of Faber to replace Machinatrix? <<<
>
> It is not encourage to change a name that works quite well. In my view there
> is no reason to replace "Machinatrix" that served well 9 years. She would
> loss her identity in a totally changed name.
>
>>>> And, do I understand correctly that Faber is a proper term for an
> engineer or artificer? <<<
>
> "Faber" is simply "smith". I don't recommend this name for her.
>

Thank you again, more to contemplate, but it looks like we are in the
final stage of this journey:

Publius Ullerius Stephanus Venator is wed to Prima Annia Megas Machinatrix

A decision tomorrow, I think.

Valete - Venator
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60481 From: Cn. Cornelius Lentulus Date: 2009-01-11
Subject: Re: Possible name change...thoughts
Salve, Piperbarbe!


>>> Prima Annia Megas Machinatrix <<<


Sorry to intervene again, but remember: a praenomen must be chosen from that list:

http://novaroma.org/nr/Praenomen

"Prima" is not on this list, because it can't be a praenomen, only cognomen. Annia has to choose from that list:

http://novaroma.org/nr/Praenomen

Thank you for your understanding.

In amicitia et fide:

Lentulus



Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60482 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2009-01-11
Subject: Re: Possible name change...thoughts
Salve Lusitane,

Bruno Cantermi <brunocantermi@...> writes:

> Salve Venator!
>
> When I entered college, I asked the censors to give me a Cognomen
> related to my academic achievement, but I wasn't given answer. I can
> you help me?

No, he can't. But somebody in the censors office might be able to.

Examining your citizen record, I see that you asked for two names
before the one you now have. It appears from the records that you
understood why you couldn't have the names you requested. If you're
unable to remember then I recommend you contact the censors.

Vale,

CN-EQVIT-MARINVS
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60483 From: Cn. Cornelius Lentulus Date: 2009-01-11
Subject: Re: Possible name change...thoughts
Salvete, Lusitane et Cn. Marine!

I remember Lusitanus indeed asked something about his cognomen change reflecting to his academic achievement but we answered him that it is not possible within the Roman onomastic system.

Honestly, I can't remember on which forum this happened. In the Triage? In the censorial cohors? In this list? I don't know but I remember his question.


Valete!
Lentulus

--- Dom 11/1/09, Gnaeus Equitius Marinus <gawne@...> ha scritto:
Da: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus <gawne@...>
Oggetto: Re: [Nova-Roma] Possible name change...thoughts
A: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Data: Domenica 11 gennaio 2009, 18:18

Salve Lusitane,

Bruno Cantermi <brunocantermi@ terra.com. br> writes:

> Salve Venator!
>
> When I entered college, I asked the censors to give me a Cognomen
> related to my academic achievement, but I wasn't given answer. I can
> you help me?

No, he can't. But somebody in the censors office might be able to.

Examining your citizen record, I see that you asked for two names
before the one you now have. It appears from the records that you
understood why you couldn't have the names you requested. If you're
unable to remember then I recommend you contact the censors.

Vale,

CN-EQVIT-MARINVS


Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60484 From: Cn. Cornelius Lentulus Date: 2009-01-11
Subject: Re: Possible name change...thoughts
Lentulus Lusitano et Cn. Marino Censorio sal.

I'm just answering to myself. I've made a little searching and I found that the question of Lusitanus was asked right here, in January, 2008, and in this main list of NR, in this message:

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma/message/54768

So he was right he asked. I doubt he asked it directly from the censors, though.


Valete!
Cn. Lentulus



--- Dom 11/1/09, Cn. Cornelius Lentulus <cn_corn_lent@...> ha scritto:
Da: Cn. Cornelius Lentulus <cn_corn_lent@...>
Oggetto: Re: [Nova-Roma] Possible name change...thoughts
A: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Data: Domenica 11 gennaio 2009, 18:33

Salvete, Lusitane et Cn. Marine!

I remember Lusitanus indeed asked something about his cognomen change reflecting to his academic achievement but we answered him that it is not possible within the Roman onomastic system.

Honestly, I can't remember on which forum this happened. In the Triage? In the censorial cohors? In this list? I don't know but I remember his question.


Valete!
Lentulus

--- Dom 11/1/09, Gnaeus Equitius Marinus <gawne@cesmail. net> ha scritto:
Da: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus <gawne@cesmail. net>
Oggetto: Re: [Nova-Roma] Possible name change...thoughts
A: Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com
Data: Domenica 11 gennaio 2009, 18:18

Salve Lusitane,

Bruno Cantermi <brunocantermi@ terra.com. br> writes:

> Salve Venator!
>
> When I entered college, I asked the censors to give me a Cognomen
> related to my academic achievement, but I wasn't given answer. I can
> you help me?

No, he can't. But somebody in the censors office might be able to.

Examining your citizen record, I see that you asked for two names
before the one you now have. It appears from the records that you
understood why you couldn't have the names you requested. If you're
unable to remember then I recommend you contact the censors.

Vale,

CN-EQVIT-MARINVS



Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60485 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2009-01-11
Subject: Re: Possible name change...thoughts
Salve Lentule,

Thanks for finding this. It does clear up the questions.

Vale,

CN-EQVIT-MARINVS


"Cn. Cornelius Lentulus" <cn_corn_lent@...> writes:

> Lentulus Lusitano et Cn. Marino Censorio sal.
>
> I'm just answering to myself. I've made a little searching and I
> found that the question of Lusitanus was asked right here, in
> January, 2008, and in this main list of NR, in this message:
>
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma/message/54768
>
> So he was right he asked. I doubt he asked it directly from the
> censors, though.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60486 From: Sondra Date: 2009-01-11
Subject: Re: Nova Roman Ring
Do you make a lighter version for women?

Cicurina


> >
> > Salvete Nova Romans
> >
> > Just a reminder that you can buy a very nice ring to commemorate
> your citizenship and love
> > of all things Roman.
> >
> > http://www.carrollcollection.com/SPQR_Ring.htm
> >
> > I wear mine everywhere!!!
> >
> > Valete
> >
> > Tiberius Galerius Paulinus
> >
>
> I do the same with mine. It is a really beautiful ring and very well
> made. If there is enough interest, why not see if there is the
> possibility to get a discount on a bulk purchase? A buying group
could
> be set up.
>
>
> MLA
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60487 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2009-01-11
Subject: Re: Nova Roman Ring
Cato Ti. Galerio Paulino omnibusque in foro SPD

Salve et Salvete.

Pauline, might it be a thought to look at offering a new ring? I know
that senators wore iron rings as a sign of office; maybe a ring could
be designed in a less precious metal for more general distribution?

Vale et valete,

Cato
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60488 From: Gaius Marcius Crispus Date: 2009-01-11
Subject: Nova Roma ring
Salvete omnes

Cato scripsit:-

Pauline, might it be a thought to look at offering a new ring? I know
that senators wore iron rings as a sign of office; maybe a ring could
be designed in a less precious metal for more general distribution?


I would like to add my vote for an iron ring, as I believe the troops also wore rings made of iron. And a cheaper metal might also produce a more affordable price.

I would certainly like a ring, and perhaps other items that could be sold to raise funds for our projects.
Vale et valete,

Crispus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60489 From: Stefn Ullerius Venator Piperbarbus Date: 2009-01-11
Subject: Re: Possible name change...thoughts
Ave Lentulus;

On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 11:11 AM, Cn. Cornelius Lentulus
<cn_corn_lent@...> wrote:
> Salve, Piperbarbe!
>
>>>> Prima Annia Megas Machinatrix <<<
>
> Sorry to intervene again, but remember: a praenomen must be chosen from that
> list: http://novaroma.org/nr/Praenomen
>
> "Prima" is not on this list, because it can't be a praenomen, only cognomen.
> Annia has to choose from that list:
>
> Thank you for your understanding.
>
> In amicitia et fide:
>
> Lentulus
>

No worries!

Machinatrix and I are looking upon this as an exercise in learning,
which is why we have kept it a public conversation. It is also an
extension of the support she has given me over the years o be involved
with Nova Roma.

Ok, looking again at the lists of names and their proper places, with
clearer heads since we had a nice lunch:

Marca Annia Megas Machinatrix...fits nicely, as my wife is a veteran
like myself, which was the milieu for her engineering work.

gratias tibi ago - Venator (soon to lose the beard ,-)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60490 From: segestamilius Date: 2009-01-11
Subject: Re: Nova Roma ring
--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Gaius Marcius Crispus"
<jbshr1pwa@...> wrote:
>
> Salvete omnes
>
> Cato scripsit:-
>
> Pauline, might it be a thought to look at offering a new ring? I
know
> that senators wore iron rings as a sign of office; maybe a ring
could
> be designed in a less precious metal for more general distribution?
>
> I would like to add my vote for an iron ring, as I believe the
troops
> also wore rings made of iron. And a cheaper metal might also
produce a
> more affordable price.
>
> I would certainly like a ring, and perhaps other items that could
be
> sold to raise funds for our projects.
> Vale et valete,
>
> Crispus
>

yes, a nice Ring, like a class ring, made of bronze, perhaps? . But
i have purchased an SPQR ring on ebay, made in Italy of Gold and
silver, for only $70. A very Beautiful ring.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60491 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2009-01-11
Subject: Re: Nova Roma ring
Cato Crispo omnibusque in foro SPD

Salve et salvete.

Just for general information:

"But at whatever time rings may have become customary at Rome, this
much is certain, that at first they were always of iron, that they
were destined for the same purpose as in Greece, namely, to be used as
seals, and that every free Roman had a right to use such a ring. This
iron ring was used down to the last period of the republic by such men
as loved the simplicity of the good old times." - William Smith, A
Dictionary of Greek and Roman Antiquities, John Murray, London, (1875)

Vale et valete,

Cato
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60492 From: Bruno Cantermi Date: 2009-01-11
Subject: Re: Possible name change...thoughts
Salve!
 
Well, I Hope so!
 
Vale,
 
LVSITANVS. SPD.
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Sunday, January 11, 2009 12:49 PM
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Possible name change...thoughts

Ave Lusitanus;

On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 9:02 AM, Bruno Cantermi wrote:
> Salve Venator!
>
> When I entered college, I asked the censors to give me a Cognomen related to
> my academic achievement, but I wasn't given answer. I can you help me?
>
> Vale,
>
> LVSITANVS.SPD.
>

As I depend upon others for hammering out what Latin I use, I must
defer to those men and women on this list who rescue me.

I should hope that by asking me, you will receive their assistance,
and further this thread on good, Roman naming practices.

============ ========= ========= ========= ==
In amicitia et fides -
Stephanus Ullerius Venator Piperbarbatus
Civis circa Quintilis MMDCCLI a.u.c.
Senator et Lictor
Patrician et Paterfamilias

Religio Septentrionalis - Poeta

Dominus Sodalitas Coquuorum et Cerevisiae Coctorum
http://groups. yahoo.com/ group/Sodalis_ Coq_et_Coq/

http://www.myspace. com/venator_ poetus
http://anheathenrea der.blogspot. com/
http://www.catamoun t-grange- hearth.org/
http://www.cafepres s.com/catamountg range
--
May the Holy Powers smile on our efforts.
May the Spirits of our family lines nod in approval.
May we be of Worth to our fellow Nova Romans.



__________ NOD32 3756 (20090110) Information __________

This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system.
http://www.eset.com
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60493 From: Gaius Marcius Crispus Date: 2009-01-11
Subject: Nova Roma ring
Crispus Cato omnibusque S.P.D.

Many thanks for that information.

You take me back over 50 years, to my favourite childhood book The Eagle of the Ninth by Rosemary Sutcliffe. I always remember my father reading to me the story, and I would wonder which of my favourite pieces he would choose for me.

I especially liked the one where Marcus saw the ring, his father's ring, lost when the Ninth was destroyed. If I may be allowed a quote.:-

"A ring swung on the end of the thong, sparkling faintly with green fire in the torch-light. It was a heavy signet ring, and on the flawed emerald which formed the bezel was engraved the dolphin badge of his own family. He held it for a long moment, held it very gently, as if it were a living thing, watching the torch-light play in the green heart of the stone"

Rings can be magical, and that one started my interest in Rome.

So, in addition to the information, I am also grateful to you for reminding me of that part of my childhood that has remained with me to this day.

Vale, et valete optime.

Crispus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60494 From: Lucia Livia Plauta Date: 2009-01-11
Subject: Re: Nova Roma ring
Salvete omnes,

I know for sure that roman troops wore bronze rings, at least in the
imperial period. I have two of those legionary signet rings myself,
which I used as a base for my reproductions. Those were probably the
cheapest kind of signet rings, because they could be made with the
lost-wax method and required no carving.

I have never seen any roman iron rings. Iron doesn't survive as
easily as bronze, so if they existed, it's not likely many survived.
As far as I know Romans couldn't smelt iron, so any iron ring would
probably have been a plain one made by beating the iron, possibly
with filed decorations, certainly not anything with a pattern or
writing on it.

Nowadays all the cheaper metals that existed in roman times other
than iron (that is, bronze and brass) are almost as expensive as
silver.

Furthermore, the biggest part of the expense involved in producing a
ring is designing the prototype and making the moulds.
However, I doubt that the production cost of the ring that Paulinus
promoted is more than 25 dollars for the silver version, and that's
an excess estimate, assuming that those rings are as heavy as my
bronze ones, and that labour costs are 10 times as high in the U.S.
The rest of the price probably covers taxes, promotion, website
costs, etc.

Optime valete,
Livia

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Gaius Marcius Crispus"
<jbshr1pwa@...> wrote:
>
> Salvete omnes
>
> Cato scripsit:-
>
> Pauline, might it be a thought to look at offering a new ring? I
know
> that senators wore iron rings as a sign of office; maybe a ring
could
> be designed in a less precious metal for more general distribution?
>
> I would like to add my vote for an iron ring, as I believe the
troops
> also wore rings made of iron. And a cheaper metal might also
produce a
> more affordable price.
>
> I would certainly like a ring, and perhaps other items that could be
> sold to raise funds for our projects.
> Vale et valete,
>
> Crispus
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60495 From: Gallagher Date: 2009-01-11
Subject: Re: Nova Roman Ring
Salve Cicurina
 
I believe they only come in one style.  I have very small hands for a man my size
and I do not find it overly heavy. If you would like you can always ask Mike
Carroll the designer.
 
Vale
 
Paulinus  




To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
From: simchajacobs@...
Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 18:13:20 +0000
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Nova Roman Ring


Do you make a lighter version for women?

Cicurina

> >
> > Salvete Nova Romans
> >
> > Just a reminder that you can buy a very nice ring to commemorate
> your citizenship and love
> > of all things Roman.
> >
> > http://www.carrollc ollection. com/SPQR_ Ring.htm
> >
> > I wear mine everywhere!! !
> >
> > Valete
> >
> > Tiberius Galerius Paulinus
> >
>
> I do the same with mine. It is a really beautiful ring and very well
> made. If there is enough interest, why not see if there is the
> possibility to get a discount on a bulk purchase? A buying group
could
> be set up.
>
>
> MLA
>


Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60496 From: Gallagher Date: 2009-01-11
Subject: Re: Nova Roman Ring
Salve Cato
 
Welcome back!
 
I have sent a note to Mike Carroll to see if it can be made out of other material.
 
Vale
 
Paulinus




To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
From: mlcinnyc@...
Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 18:43:21 +0000
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Nova Roman Ring


Cato Ti. Galerio Paulino omnibusque in foro SPD

Salve et Salvete.

Pauline, might it be a thought to look at offering a new ring? I know
that senators wore iron rings as a sign of office; maybe a ring could
be designed in a less precious metal for more general distribution?

Vale et valete,

Cato


Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60497 From: Gaius Petronius Dexter Date: 2009-01-11
Subject: Re: Possible name change...thoughts
C. Petronius Cn. Lentulo suo s.p.d,

> Yes, as you say. But "machinatrix" does mean "engeneer", too. What
our Caligula

What my usenet nickname is coming in here?

> (C. Petronius Dexter)

It is my true name in NR, no need brackets. ;o)

>> said was that machinatrix has a bad connotation too, but not only.
The first meaning of "machinatrix" is "a woman working with machines".

Do you really think that women handled machines in theatres or engine-
siege in the battlefields? In all the Roman litterature we have one
example of machinatrix, it is in the drama Medea composed by Seneca.
And the word indeed comes from the verb machinari, not in its working
meaning (Medea was on stage not on stage machinery.) but in its moral
meaning. Medea was plotting the murder of her sons she had with Jason.

>>> It is not encourage to change a name that works quite well.<<<

He he he... Machinatrix works, indeed.

>>> In my view there is no reason to replace "Machinatrix" that
served well 9 years. She would loss her identity in a totally changed
name.<<<

Even if she wants to change her names?

Optime uale.

C. Petronius Dexter
Flamen Portunalis
Quaestor
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60498 From: Gallagher Date: 2009-01-11
Subject: FW: SPQR ring
Salvete
 
FYI
 
Valete
 
Paulinus

> Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 14:44:49 -0800
> From: mike@...
> Subject: Re: SPQR ring
> To: spqr753@...
>
> Hi  happy new year to you. I'm sorry to report that so far, we only offer the ring in sterling silver and various karats of gold.
>
> We have been exploring the possibility of casting in other less-expensive metals like stainless steel and titanium but because they have such high melting temperatures, it is very difficult to produce the same product. I am continuing to look for other metals and perhaps out-sourcing that casting process but so far, have not found anyone in the U.S.
>
> If you have any other questions, please do not hesitate to call or email. My best. Mike
>
> Mike Carroll
> United States Eagle Rings
> http://www.eaglerings.com
> 847-821-1333
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60499 From: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com Date: 2009-01-11
Subject: File - language.txt
Nova Roma's official business language is English, and its official ceremonial language is Latin. There are other non-official languages that must be considered as common use languages, due to the international nature of the Nova Roman community. To insure timely posting, write your posts in English, French, German, Hungarian, Italian, Latin, Portuguese or Spanish.

---------------------------

El idioma de trabajo de Nova Roma es el Ingl�s, y su lenguaje ceremonial es el Lat�n. Hay otros idiomas no oficiales que deben ser considerados de uso com�n, debido a la naturaleza internacional de la comunidad nova romana. Para asegurar que la publicaci�n inmediata de los mensajes, escriba en Ingl�s, Franc�s, Alem�n, H�ngaro, Italiano, Lat�n, Portugu�s o Espa�ol.

-----------------------------

La lingua ufficiale a Nova Roma � l�Inglese e quella ceremoniale � il Latino. Ci sono altre lingue non ufficiali che devono essere considerate d�uso comune dovuto al carattere internazionale della comunit� nova romana. Per assicurarsi dell�immediata pubblicazione dei messaggi pu� scrivere in Inglese, Francese, Tedesco, Ungherese, Italiano, Latino, Portoghese o Spagnolo.

-----------------------------
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60500 From: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com Date: 2009-01-11
Subject: File - EDICTUM DE SERMONE
Ex officio praetorum:

The Nova-Roma mailing list is the principal forum for Nova Roma.
Citizens of Nova Roma and interested non-citizens alike are welcome. All users, citizen and non-citizen alike, shall abide by these rules when posting to the Nova Roma mailing list. Violations of these rules will result in corrective action, which may include banning from the list for non-citizens and restriction of posting privileges for citizens.


---

I. Language

Nova Roma's official business language is English, and its official ceremonial language is Latin. There are other non-official languages that must be considered as common use languages, due to the international nature of the Nova Roman community. To insure timely posting, write your posts in English, French, German, Hungarian, Italian, Latin, Portuguese or Spanish. If you write your posts in languages other than the above mentioned, they may be delayed for some time until the moderators can obtain a translation.



All official government documents must appear in English/Latin as well as whatever vernacular languages are relevant.



---


II. Topics of discussion

Nova Roman business, community, governmental, religious, and other state activities

The culture, religion, sociology, politics, history, archaeology, and philosophy of Roma Antiqua, ancient Greece, the ancient Near East, and other cultures with which the ancient Romans interacted.

Discussions may sometimes go into subjects beyond these topics, but such digressions should be brief and related to the listed topics. Messages of this kind must be clearly marked as �off topic�.



---

III. Civil Discourse

All on-list exchanges between users of the Nova-Roma mailing list will follow these rules of civil discourse:

Show respect for others.

Recognize a person�s right to advocate ideas that are different from your own.

Discuss policies and ideas without attacking people.

Use helpful, not hurtful language.

Write as you would like to be written to.

Restate ideas when asked.

Write in good faith.

Treat what others have to say as written in good faith.

Respectfully read and consider differing points of view.

When unsure, clarify what you think you have read.

Realize that what you wrote and what people understand you to have written may be different.

Recognize that people can agree to disagree.

Speak and write for yourself, not others.



---

IV. Forbidden

The following are forbidden:

Unsolicited commercial e-mail (UCE or spam)

References or discussions to material of a sexual nature that are not strictly within the context of a historical discussion, with citations given, unless the material is a matter of common knowledge

Links to external websites or files which contain material that might reasonably be deemed obscene or pornographic.



Insulting the religious beliefs of others, and the historical basis for those beliefs, is off limits.



This edict takes effect immediately.



Given under our hands this 20th day of January 2761 from the founding of Roma



M. Curiatius Complutensis

M.Iulius Severus



Praetores Novae Romae
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60501 From: Gallagher Date: 2009-01-11
Subject: Re: File - EDICTUM DE SERMONE
Salvete
 
I know this is a auto message but could we make sure that the
current Praetors agree with this.
 
If they do could someone please attach our new Praetors names to it?
 
Valete
 
Paulinus
 


> From: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 23:48:18 +0000
> Subject: [Nova-Roma] File - EDICTUM DE SERMONE
>
>
> Ex officio praetorum:
>
> The Nova-Roma mailing list is the principal forum for Nova Roma.
> Citizens of Nova Roma and interested non-citizens alike are welcome. All users, citizen and non-citizen alike, shall abide by these rules when posting to the Nova Roma mailing list. Violations of these rules will result in corrective action, which may include banning from the list for non-citizens and restriction of posting privileges for citizens.
>
>
> ---
>
> I. Language
>
> Nova Roma's official business language is English, and its official ceremonial language is Latin. There are other non-official languages that must be considered as common use languages, due to the international nature of the Nova Roman community. To insure timely posting, write your posts in English, French, German, Hungarian, Italian, Latin, Portuguese or Spanish. If you write your posts in languages other than the above mentioned, they may be delayed for some time until the moderators can obtain a translation.
>
>
>
> All official government documents must appear in English/Latin as well as whatever vernacular languages are relevant.
>
>
>
> ---
>
>
> II. Topics of discussion
>
> Nova Roman business, community, governmental, religious, and other state activities
>
> The culture, religion, sociology, politics, history, archaeology, and philosophy of Roma Antiqua, ancient Greece, the ancient Near East, and other cultures with which the ancient Romans interacted.
>
> Discussions may sometimes go into subjects beyond these topics, but such digressions should be brief and related to the listed topics. Messages of this kind must be clearly marked as ・off topic・.
>
>
>
> ---
>
> III. Civil Discourse
>
> All on-list exchanges between users of the Nova-Roma mailing list will follow these rules of civil discourse:
>
> Show respect for others.
>
> Recognize a person・s right to advocate ideas that are different from your own.
>
> Discuss policies and ideas without attacking people.
>
> Use helpful, not hurtful language.
>
> Write as you would like to be written to.
>
> Restate ideas when asked.
>
> Write in good faith.
>
> Treat what others have to say as written in good faith.
>
> Respectfully read and consider differing points of view.
>
> When unsure, clarify what you think you have read.
>
> Realize that what you wrote and what people understand you to have written may be different.
>
> Recognize that people can agree to disagree.
>
> Speak and write for yourself, not others.
>
>
>
> ---
>
> IV. Forbidden
>
> The following are forbidden:
>
> Unsolicited commercial e-mail (UCE or spam)
>
> References or discussions to material of a sexual nature that are not strictly within the context of a historical discussion, with citations given, unless the material is a matter of common knowledge
>
> Links to external websites or files which contain material that might reasonably be deemed obscene or pornographic.
>
>
>
> Insulting the religious beliefs of others, and the historical basis for those beliefs, is off limits.
>
>
>
> This edict takes effect immediately.
>
>
>
> Given under our hands this 20th day of January 2761 from the founding of Roma
>
>
>
> M. Curiatius Complutensis
>
> M.Iulius Severus
>
>
>
> Praetores Novae Romae
>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
> <*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma/
>
> <*> Your email settings:
> Individual Email | Traditional
>
> <*> To change settings online go to:
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma/join
> (Yahoo! ID required)
>
> <*> To change settings via email:
> mailto:Nova-Roma-digest@yahoogroups.com
> mailto:Nova-Roma-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com
>
> <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
> <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
> http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60502 From: Cn. Cornelius Lentulus Date: 2009-01-11
Subject: R: [Nova-Roma] Re: Possible name change...thoughts
Lentulus Petronio suo sal.


>>> What my usenet nickname is coming in here? <<<


To promote your Latin writer name. You also said you like that name.


>>> Do you really think that women handled machines in theatres or engine-
siege in the battlefields? <<<



No, but today they do. And we live today. Today it is possible.


>>> And the word indeed comes from the verb machinari, not in its working
meaning <<<



The Oxford Latin Dictionary which is the ultimate authority in Classical Latin, gives the first meaning of "machinator" as "one who devises or constructs machines, an engineer". The second meaning is that bad: "a contriver of plots". The female variant of this word is machinatrix, so Annia can use it. It is just because of the patriarchic ancient circumstances that a woman could not be engeneer.


>>> Even if she wants to change her names? <<<


Nova Roma does not allow name changes in general. In Nova Roma one can change his name only if the name incorrect according to the classical Roman naming conventions or bad Latin. Machinatrix fits the requirements so it should not be changed, neither Annia.

Marca Annia Megas Machinatrix is perect, a bit long, but never mind: Quintus Caecilius Metellus Pius Cornelianus Scipio Nasica Serapio would not mind it either. ;-)

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60503 From: Gallagher Date: 2009-01-11
Subject: Re: R: [Nova-Roma] Re: Possible name change...thoughts
Salvete
 
I hope  "Quintus Caecilius Metellus Pius Cornelianus Scipio Nasica Serapio"
is not on any Nova Roma sports team as we could never get that name
on the jersey.
 
Valete
 
Paulinus 




To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
From: cn_corn_lent@...
Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 00:12:10 +0000
Subject: R: [Nova-Roma] Re: Possible name change...thoughts


Lentulus Petronio suo sal.


>>> What my usenet nickname is coming in here? <<<


To promote your Latin writer name. You also said you like that name.


>>> Do you really think that women handled machines in theatres or engine-
siege in the battlefields? <<<


No, but today they do. And we live today. Today it is possible.


>>> And the word indeed comes from the verb machinari, not in its working
meaning <<<


The Oxford Latin Dictionary which is the ultimate authority in Classical Latin, gives the first meaning of "machinator" as "one who devises or constructs machines, an engineer". The second meaning is that bad: "a contriver of plots". The female variant of this word is machinatrix, so Annia can use it. It is just because of the patriarchic ancient circumstances that a woman could not be engeneer.


>>> Even if she wants to change her names? <<<


Nova Roma does not allow name changes in general. In Nova Roma one can change his name only if the name incorrect according to the classical Roman naming conventions or bad Latin. Machinatrix fits the requirements so it should not be changed, neither Annia.

Marca Annia Megas Machinatrix is perect, a bit long, but never mind: Quintus Caecilius Metellus Pius Cornelianus Scipio Nasica Serapio would not mind it either. ;-)


Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60504 From: fauxrari Date: 2009-01-11
Subject: Re: Possible name change...thoughts
Lentulus is a master namer. I remember my first choice which I had
used with other groups was mired in existing familial ties to other
citizens, so I had to start over. I am professional race car driver
so he suggested going with 'Auriga.' I like it so much, I am going to
see if I can get it as a vanity plate for one of my cars!
Vale,
L. Antonia Auriga

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Stefn Ullerius Venator
Piperbarbus" <famila.ulleria.venii@...> wrote:
>
> Ave Lentulus;
>
> On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 11:11 AM, Cn. Cornelius Lentulus
> <cn_corn_lent@...> wrote:
> > Salve, Piperbarbe!
> >
> >>>> Prima Annia Megas Machinatrix <<<
> >
> > Sorry to intervene again, but remember: a praenomen must be
chosen from that
> > list: http://novaroma.org/nr/Praenomen
> >
> > "Prima" is not on this list, because it can't be a praenomen,
only cognomen.
> > Annia has to choose from that list:
> >
> > Thank you for your understanding.
> >
> > In amicitia et fide:
> >
> > Lentulus
> >
>
> No worries!
>
> Machinatrix and I are looking upon this as an exercise in learning,
> which is why we have kept it a public conversation. It is also an
> extension of the support she has given me over the years o be
involved
> with Nova Roma.
>
> Ok, looking again at the lists of names and their proper places,
with
> clearer heads since we had a nice lunch:
>
> Marca Annia Megas Machinatrix...fits nicely, as my wife is a veteran
> like myself, which was the milieu for her engineering work.
>
> gratias tibi ago - Venator (soon to lose the beard ,-)
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60505 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2009-01-11
Subject: Re: File - EDICTUM DE SERMONE
Cato praetores omnibusque in foro SPD

Salvete.

One note. In the edict as it is, it states:

"I. Language

Nova Roma's official business language is English, and its official ceremonial
language is Latin."

but then continues

"All official government documents must appear in English/Latin as well as
whatever vernacular languages are relevant."

The hash mark between "English" and "Latin" in the second section is grammatically
understood to mean "and/or". This conflicts with the statement that the official
government language is English, because it would allow an official government document
to appear in Latin alone ("or") and a vernacular language. Our current praetors might want
to clear that up before issuing the edict officially.

Valete,

Cato
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60506 From: Colin Cunningham Date: 2009-01-11
Subject: Re: File - EDICTUM DE SERMONE
Salvete,

I hate to nitpick, but shouldn't the date be the current date?  It has the current consuls, but not the current date on it, and the date is mentioned as "Given under our hands this 20th  day of January 2761 from the founding of Roma."  If I am mistaken, please ignore this message.  

Valete,

C Fulvius Severus

On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 6:48 PM, <Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

Ex officio praetorum:

The Nova-Roma mailing list is the principal forum for Nova Roma.
Citizens of Nova Roma and interested non-citizens alike are welcome.  All users, citizen and non-citizen alike, shall abide by these rules when posting to the Nova Roma mailing list.  Violations of these rules will result in corrective action, which may include banning from the list for non-citizens and restriction of posting privileges for citizens.


---

I. Language

Nova Roma's official business language is English, and its official ceremonial language is Latin. There are other non-official languages that must be considered as common use languages, due to the international nature of the Nova Roman community. To insure timely posting, write your posts in English, French, German, Hungarian, Italian, Latin, Portuguese or Spanish. If you write your posts in languages other than the above mentioned, they may be delayed for some time until the moderators can obtain a translation.



All official government documents must appear in English/Latin as well as whatever vernacular languages are relevant.



---


II. Topics of discussion

Nova Roman business, community, governmental, religious, and other  state activities

The culture, religion, sociology, politics, history, archaeology, and philosophy of  Roma Antiqua, ancient Greece, the ancient Near East, and other  cultures with which the ancient Romans interacted.

Discussions may sometimes go into subjects beyond these topics, but such digressions should be brief and related to the listed topics. Messages of this kind must be clearly marked as "off topic".



---

III. Civil Discourse

All on-list exchanges between users of the Nova-Roma mailing list will  follow these rules of civil discourse:

Show respect for others.

Recognize a person's right to advocate ideas that are different from your own.

Discuss policies and ideas without attacking people.

Use helpful, not hurtful language.

Write as you would like to be written to.

Restate ideas when asked.

Write in good faith.

Treat what others have to say as written in good faith.

Respectfully read and consider differing points of view.

When unsure, clarify what you think you have read.

Realize that what you wrote and what people understand you to have written may be different.

Recognize that people can agree to disagree.

Speak and write for yourself, not others.



---

IV. Forbidden

The following are forbidden:

Unsolicited commercial e-mail (UCE or spam)

References or discussions to material of a sexual nature that are not strictly within  the context of a historical discussion, with citations given, unless the  material is a matter of common knowledge

Links to external websites or files which contain material that might  reasonably be deemed obscene or pornographic.



Insulting the religious beliefs of others, and the historical basis for those beliefs, is off limits.



This edict takes effect immediately.



Given under our hands this 20th  day of January 2761 from the founding of Roma



M. Curiatius Complutensis

M.Iulius Severus



Praetores Novae Romae


------------------------------------

Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
   http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma/

<*> Your email settings:
   Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
   http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma/join
   (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
   mailto:Nova-Roma-digest@yahoogroups.com
   mailto:Nova-Roma-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
   Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
   http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/


Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60507 From: Maior Date: 2009-01-11
Subject: Re: a.d. III Eid. Ian. - The Carmentalia
M. Hortensia Maior C. Equitio Cantoni Quiritesque spd;
today is the Carmentalia, Carmentis can be read about in our wiki
here:http://www.novaroma.org/nr/Carmentis
I performed the Carmentalia ritual
http://www.novaroma.org/nr/Carmentalia_%28Nova_Roma%29
as written by our Pontifex Maximus M. Moravius Piscinus this sunday
afternoon in the grove behind my house in Mons Capellae, Carolina
My offerings were honeyed milk, a cake made of figs and nuts,
incense and nuts.
I observed no bad signs and finished the ritual praying that dea
Carmentis favour the cives of Nova Roma with many children and those
in childbirth. I asked the gods to favour the magistrates and
citizens of Nova Roma.
The next Carmentalia ritual will be celebrated on Thursday.
May the gods favour Nova Roma forever!
bene vadete in pacem deorum
M. Hortensia Maior
Flaminica Carmentalis


>
> OSD C. Equitius Cato
>
> Salvete omnes!
>
> Hodiernus dies est ante diem III Eidus Ianuarius; haec dies
nefastus
> publicus est.
>
> "Then stretching out her arm to the right bank,
> She stamped three times, wildly, on the pine deck:
> Evander barely held her back with his hand,
> Barely stopped her leaping swiftly to land.
> `Hail, you gods of the land we sought' she cried,
> `And you the place that will give heaven new gods,
> And you nymphs of the grove, and crowds of Naiads!
> May the sight of you be a good omen for me and my son,
> And happy be the foot that touches that shore!
> Am I wrong, or will those hills raise mighty walls,
> And from this earth all the earth receive its laws?
> The whole world is one day promised to these hills:
> Who could believe the place held such fate in store?
> Soon Trojan ships will touch these shores,
> And a woman, Lavinia, shall cause fresh war.
> Pallas, dear grandson, why put on that fatal armour?
> Put it on! No mean champion will avenge you.
> Conquered Troy you will conquer, and rise from your fall,
> Your very ruin overwhelms your enemy's houses.
> Conquering flames consume Neptune's Ilium!
> Will that prevent its ashes rising higher than the world?
> Soon pious Aeneas will bring the sacred Penates, and his
> Sacred father here: Vesta, receive the gods of Troy!" ...
> But the felicitous prophetess, as she lived beloved of the gods,
> Now a goddess herself, has this day of Janus' month as hers. - Ovid,
> "Fasti" I: The Carmentalia
>
> "Of this goddess little is said in historical times, when the
> primitive Latin worship was obscured by a crowd of Grecian and
> Oriental deities; but she must have held a leading place in early
> times, for she had a special priest, the Flamen Carmentalis, and the
> gate near which her altar stood just at the foot of the Capitoline,
> between it and the river, was called Carmentalis. Plutarch says that
> some supposed Carmenta to be one of the Fates who presided over the
> birth of men. The Greek title of the goddess was Themis. Into her
> chapel it was not permitted to carry any part of a dead animal, for
> example, anything made of leather. It is related that the famous
> Marcus Popillius, in the time of the Samnite wars, the first
plebeian
> who ever obtained the honor of a triumph, was flamen of Carmentis.
> When one day he was performing a sacrifice, clad in the laena, or
> priestly robe, a tumult arose in the city. Popillius then hastily
left
> the sacrifice, clad as he was, made his way to the assembly, and
> calmed the tumult by his authority and eloquence. In memory of this,
> from the loena or robe which he wore, the people gave him the name
of
> Laenas, which was borne by his descendants; for it was quite out of
> order to address the people in any robe but the toga, the
distinctive
> costume of a Roman citizen." - William S. Walsh, "Curiosities of
> Popular Customs And of Rites, Ceremonies, Observances, and
> Miscellaneous Antiquities" (1925)
>
> Today is the celebration of the Carmentalia, celebrated in honor of
> the nymph Carmenta or Carmentis, the mother of Evander. Upon
reaching
> Latium with her son, she climbed atop a hill and began prophesying
> and singing. This festival is celebrated annually on the 11th and
the
> 15th of January, and no other particulars of it are recorded except
> that Carmenta was invoked in it as "Postvorta" and "Antevorta",
> epithets which had reference to her power of looking back into the
> past and forward into the future. Her name comes from the
> word "carmen" or "song"; she is said to have invented both the
sacred
> music of the Romans and the 15-letter alphabet.
>
>
> "Quitting his couch, Tithonus' bride will witness
> The high priest's rite of Arcadian Carmentis.
> The same light received you too, Juturna, Turnus' sister,
> There where the Aqua Virgo circles the Campus.
> Where shall I find the cause and nature of these rites?
> Who will steer my vessel in mid-ocean? - Ovid, "Fasti" I; 11 January
>
> Today is also the celebration of the Iuturnalia, in honor of the
> goddess Iuturna, in a festival celebrated on the anniversary of the
> day on which her temple was erected in the Campus Martius (Field of
> Mars, where soldiers trained, a place dedicated to the Roman god of
> war, Mars) by Quintus Lutatius Catulus, a great-great-great uncle of
> Julius Caesar.
>
> Iuturna is the goddess of fountains, wells, and springs, and the
> nymph of the fountain in Latium famous for its reputed healing
> powers. She was a sister of Turnus and supported him against
> Aeneas. Turnus had been seeking the hand of Lavinia, daughter of
> Latinus, the king of the Latins. Iuno, who hated the Trojans,
> prompted Turnus to foment war between the Latins and the Trojans,
and
> although Latinus wsn't happy about it, he allowed Turnus to go to
> war. Iuppiter later turned Iuturna into a nymph and gave her a
sacred
> well in Lavinium in Latium, as well as another one near the temple
to
> Vesta in the Forum Romanum. The second well was called Lacus
> Iuturnae, and was reputed to be the well at which the Dioscuri
> refreshed their horses on the way to announce the victory at the
> Battle of Lake Regillus (496 B.C.).
>
> On a side note, Iuturna and Iuppiter had an affair that Iuppiter
> wanted to keep under wraps from Iuno, for obvious reasons.
> Unfortunately, one of Iuturna's closest companions was the nymph
> Larunda, whose one great personal characteristic was her inability
to
> shut up. She inadvertantly gave away Iuppiter's secret, and in
anger
> he cut out her tongue and banished her to watch over the Avernus
> River at the mouth of the Underworld. Mercury, charged with
> escorting her there, fell in love with her and as a result of their
> brief but fruitful adventure she gave birth to the two Lares, the
> household gods.
>
>
> Valete bene!
>
> Cato
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60508 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2009-01-11
Subject: Re: R: [Nova-Roma] Re: Possible name change...thoughts
Re: R: [Nova-Roma] Re: Possible name change...thoughts
A. Tullia Scholastica Cn. Cornelio Lentulo C. Petronio Dextro Stephano Ullerio Venatori quiritibus bonae voluntatis S.P.D.
 

Lentulus Petronio suo sal.


>>> What my usenet nickname is coming in here? <<<


To promote your Latin writer name. You also said you like that name.


>>> Do you really think that women handled machines in theatres or engine-
siege in the battlefields? <<<


No, but today they do. And we live today. Today it is possible.


>>> And the word indeed comes from the verb machinari, not in its working
meaning <<<


The Oxford Latin Dictionary which is the ultimate authority in Classical Latin, gives the first meaning of "machinator" as "one who devises or constructs machines, an engineer". The second meaning is that bad: "a contriver of plots". The female variant of this word is machinatrix, so Annia can use it. It is just because of the patriarchic ancient circumstances that a woman could not be engeneer.

    ATS:  And the only meaning the OLD gives for the female version is female contriver...  The older Lewis and Short unabridged lists this as an inventress, citing the same passage.  L & S give the meaning machinist for the masculine as well as engineer.


>>> Even if she wants to change her names? <<<


Nova Roma does not allow name changes in general. In Nova Roma one can change his name only if the name incorrect according to the classical Roman naming conventions or bad Latin.

    ATS:  Yes, though we do allow the tirones to change their names.  Some discover that the cognomen is the most commonly used part of the name, and the most distinctive...but there are many, many with the cognomen Lupus, the cognomen Severus, the cognomen Caesar...and then they want to change.  


Machinatrix fits the requirements so it should not be changed, neither Annia.

Marca Annia Megas Machinatrix is perect, a bit long, but never mind: Quintus Caecilius Metellus Pius Cornelianus Scipio Nasica Serapio would not mind it either. ;-)

    ATS:  I hope that all of these do not belong to one person, though I know the first four do...
 

 Valete.
 
      
   Messages in this topic           <http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma/message/60461
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60509 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2009-01-11
Subject: Re: File - EDICTUM DE SERMONE
Re: [Nova-Roma] File - EDICTUM DE SERMONE
A. Tullia Scholastica C. Fulvio Severo quiritibus, sociis, peregrinisque bonae voluntatis S.P.D.
 

Salvete,

I hate to nitpick, but shouldn't the date be the current date?  It has the current consuls,

    ATS:  Edicta regarding behavior on the Main List are the responsibility of the praetores, not the consules.  This is the edictum published by then-praetores Complutensis and Severus.  I don’t know whether or not the current praetores, Marinus and Albucius, have agreed to this.  However, it is sent automatically, and has the date on which it was originally published.  There is a month or so during which magistrates may choose to retain the edicta of their predecessors.  It is early in the year; cohortes are just getting organized.  Please give everyone a chance.  



but not the current date on it, and the date is mentioned as "Given under our hands this 20th  day of January 2761 from the founding of Roma."  If I am mistaken, please ignore this message.  

    ATS:  The previous praetores sent this on the indicated date.  As consules, they do not establish standards for the ML, but may moderate it.  As I said, there is a lag period for (re)organization.  Please let people (including the praetores and their staffs) settle down and get a bit of experience.   

Valete,

C Fulvius Severus

Vale, et valete.  

On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 6:48 PM,  <Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

Ex officio praetorum:

The Nova-Roma mailing list is the principal forum for Nova Roma.
Citizens of Nova Roma and interested non-citizens alike are welcome.  All users, citizen and non-citizen alike, shall abide by these rules when posting to the Nova Roma mailing list.  Violations of these rules will result in corrective action, which may include banning from the list for non-citizens and restriction of posting privileges for citizens.


---

I. Language

Nova Roma's official business language is English, and its official ceremonial language is Latin. There are other non-official languages that must be considered as common use languages, due to the international nature of the Nova Roman community. To insure timely posting, write your posts in English, French, German, Hungarian, Italian, Latin, Portuguese or Spanish. If you write your posts in languages other than the above mentioned, they may be delayed for some time until the moderators can obtain a translation.



All official government documents must appear in English/Latin as well as whatever vernacular languages are relevant.



---


II. Topics of discussion

Nova Roman business, community, governmental, religious, and other  state activities

The culture, religion, sociology, politics, history, archaeology, and philosophy of  Roma Antiqua, ancient Greece, the ancient Near East, and other  cultures with which the ancient Romans interacted.

Discussions may sometimes go into subjects beyond these topics, but such digressions should be brief and related to the listed topics. Messages of this kind must be clearly marked as "off topic".



---

III. Civil Discourse

All on-list exchanges between users of the Nova-Roma mailing list will  follow these rules of civil discourse:

Show respect for others.

Recognize a person's right to advocate ideas that are different from your own.

Discuss policies and ideas without attacking people.

Use helpful, not hurtful language.

Write as you would like to be written to.

Restate ideas when asked.

Write in good faith.

Treat what others have to say as written in good faith.

Respectfully read and consider differing points of view.

When unsure, clarify what you think you have read.

Realize that what you wrote and what people understand you to have written may be different.

Recognize that people can agree to disagree.

Speak and write for yourself, not others.



---

IV. Forbidden

The following are forbidden:

Unsolicited commercial e-mail (UCE or spam)

References or discussions to material of a sexual nature that are not strictly within  the context of a historical discussion, with citations given, unless the  material is a matter of common knowledge

Links to external websites or files which contain material that might  reasonably be deemed obscene or pornographic.



Insulting the religious beliefs of others, and the historical basis for those beliefs, is off limits.



This edict takes effect immediately.



Given under our hands this 20th  day of January 2761 from the founding of Roma



M. Curiatius Complutensis

M.Iulius Severus



Praetores Novae Romae


------------------------------------


Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60510 From: Colin Cunningham Date: 2009-01-11
Subject: Re: File - EDICTUM DE SERMONE

On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 11:07 PM, A. Tullia Scholastica <fororom@...> wrote:

A. Tullia Scholastica C. Fulvio Severo quiritibus, sociis, peregrinisque bonae voluntatis S.P.D.

 

Salvete,

I hate to nitpick, but shouldn't the date be the current date?  It has the current consuls,

    ATS:  Edicta regarding behavior on the Main List are the responsibility of the praetores, not the consules.  This is the edictum published by then-praetores Complutensis and Severus.  I don't know whether or not the current praetores, Marinus and Albucius, have agreed to this.  However, it is sent automatically, and has the date on which it was originally published.  There is a month or so during which magistrates may choose to retain the edicta of their predecessors.  It is early in the year; cohortes are just getting organized.  Please give everyone a chance.  

             CFS:  Thanks for clearing it up for me.  I wanted to make sure, as I am in the praetorian cohort, and I knew it was a the domain of the praetors.  I also know that the Consuls have the highest imperium, and so from my understanding, if they had issued the edict it would still have been binding if they had issued it this year.  My concern was more about the date, making sure it was correct.  And as you said, give everyone a chance, just be sure to include me in that statement ; )


but not the current date on it, and the date is mentioned as "Given under our hands this 20th  day of January 2761 from the founding of Roma."  If I am mistaken, please ignore this message.  

    ATS:  The previous praetores sent this on the indicated date.  As consules, they do not establish standards for the ML, but may moderate it.  As I said, there is a lag period for (re)organization.  Please let people (including the praetores and their staffs) settle down and get a bit of experience.   
 
     CFS: Experience is needed, especially by me.

Valete,

C Fulvius Severus

Vale, et valete.  


On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 6:48 PM,  <Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

Ex officio praetorum:

The Nova-Roma mailing list is the principal forum for Nova Roma.
Citizens of Nova Roma and interested non-citizens alike are welcome.  All users, citizen and non-citizen alike, shall abide by these rules when posting to the Nova Roma mailing list.  Violations of these rules will result in corrective action, which may include banning from the list for non-citizens and restriction of posting privileges for citizens.


---

I. Language

Nova Roma's official business language is English, and its official ceremonial language is Latin. There are other non-official languages that must be considered as common use languages, due to the international nature of the Nova Roman community. To insure timely posting, write your posts in English, French, German, Hungarian, Italian, Latin, Portuguese or Spanish. If you write your posts in languages other than the above mentioned, they may be delayed for some time until the moderators can obtain a translation.



All official government documents must appear in English/Latin as well as whatever vernacular languages are relevant.



---


II. Topics of discussion

Nova Roman business, community, governmental, religious, and other  state activities

The culture, religion, sociology, politics, history, archaeology, and philosophy of  Roma Antiqua, ancient Greece, the ancient Near East, and other  cultures with which the ancient Romans interacted.

Discussions may sometimes go into subjects beyond these topics, but such digressions should be brief and related to the listed topics. Messages of this kind must be clearly marked as "off topic".



---

III. Civil Discourse

All on-list exchanges between users of the Nova-Roma mailing list will  follow these rules of civil discourse:

Show respect for others.

Recognize a person's right to advocate ideas that are different from your own.

Discuss policies and ideas without attacking people.

Use helpful, not hurtful language.

Write as you would like to be written to.

Restate ideas when asked.

Write in good faith.

Treat what others have to say as written in good faith.

Respectfully read and consider differing points of view.

When unsure, clarify what you think you have read.

Realize that what you wrote and what people understand you to have written may be different.

Recognize that people can agree to disagree.

Speak and write for yourself, not others.



---

IV. Forbidden

The following are forbidden:

Unsolicited commercial e-mail (UCE or spam)

References or discussions to material of a sexual nature that are not strictly within  the context of a historical discussion, with citations given, unless the  material is a matter of common knowledge

Links to external websites or files which contain material that might  reasonably be deemed obscene or pornographic.



Insulting the religious beliefs of others, and the historical basis for those beliefs, is off limits.



This edict takes effect immediately.



Given under our hands this 20th  day of January 2761 from the founding of Roma



M. Curiatius Complutensis

M.Iulius Severus



Praetores Novae Romae


------------------------------------



Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60511 From: Titus Arminius Genialis Date: 2009-01-12
Subject: Alguém fala português? / Does anyone speak Portuguese?
LEG. PR. PR. BRASILIAE T. ARMINIUS GENIALIS CIVIBUS NOVAE ROMAE SPD
 
[Versão em português: / Please scroll down for English version]
 
Sou o governador provincial do Brasil, e gostaria de dar as boas-vindas a todos os novos cidadãos de Nova Roma falantes de português!
Se você ainda não entrou para os grupos provinciais, não deixe de fazê-lo, pois esta é a melhor forma de mantermos a comunicação com as pessoas que moram perto de nós...
 
Se você mora no Brasil, o seu grupo é http://groups.yahoo.com/group/NRBrasil
Se você mora em Portugal, o seu grupo é http://groups.yahoo.com/groups/NRHispania
 
De qualquer maneira, em nome da Província do Brasil de Nova Roma, convido a todos os falantes de português, mesmo que não sejam brasileiros, a entrarem para o nosso grupo e participarem de nossas discussões!!
 
E se você, brasileiro, vive próximo a São Paulo, não perca o nosso encontro provincial, que está marcado para o início de fevereiro de 2009!!! Estaremos todos presentes em um restaurante típico romano, usando túnicas, togas e toda a vestimenta tradicional e (tentando) falar em latim!!
 
PARTICIPE!!! APROVEITE O QUE NOVA ROMA TEM A OFERECER!!!
 
 
TITUS ARMINIUS GENIALIS
Lictor Curiatus
Rogator
Legatus Pro Praetore Brasilia
Interpres Lusitanice
Scriba Censoris
tagenialis@...
 
======================================================
 
LEG. PR. PR. BRASILIAE T. ARMINIUS GENIALIS CIVIBUS NOVAE ROMAE SPD
 
[English version]
 
I am provincial governor of Brazil and I would like to welcome all Portuguese-speaking Nova Roma new citizens!
If you did not subscribe to the provincial mailing lists, don't forget doing it, as this is the best way of communicate with people who live nearby...
 
If you live in Brazil, your group is http://groups.yahoo.com/group/NRBrasil
If you live in Portugal, your group is http://groups.yahoo.com/group/NRHispania
 
Anyway, on behalf of Provincia Brasilia, I invite all the Portuguese-speakers, even those who are not Brazilian, to subscribe to our group and take part of our discussions!!
 
And if you, Brazilian, do live near São Paulo city, don't lose our provincial meeting, scheduled for early February, 2009!!! We will all be present at a tipical restaurant, wearing tunics, togas and all the traditional clothes and also (at least trying to) speaking Latin!!
 
PARTICIPATE!!! ENJOY WHAT NOVA ROMA OFFERS YOU!!!
 
 
TITUS ARMINIUS GENIALIS
Lictor Curiatus
Rogator
Legatus Pro Praetore Brasilia
Interpres Lusitanice
Scriba Censoris
tagenialis@...
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60512 From: Gaius Petronius Dexter Date: 2009-01-12
Subject: Re: R: [Nova-Roma] Re: Possible name change...thoughts
C. Petronius Cn. Lentulo suo s.p.d.,
 
>>> To promote your Latin writer name. You also said you like that name.
Thanks very much.

>>>The Oxford Latin Dictionary which is the ultimate authority in Classical Latin, gives the first meaning of "machinator" as "one who devises or constructs machines, an engineer". <<<
 
I agree with machinator, but I desagree with machinatrix.
 
Can I explain my point of view? You know that it is a Latin tradition, I do not know the English tradition, that masculine word of jobs are full of praise, but the same jobs at their feminine version are full of shame. Because, of course, the vulgar tradition knows only one job to the women, and I guess you understand me.
 
So in French :
Entraîneur, entraîneuse,
péripatéticien, péripatéticienne,
courtisan, courtisane,
homme public, femme publique,
gagneur, gagneuse,
abatteur, abatteuse,
allumeur, allumeuse,
galérien, galérienne,
marcheur, marcheuse...
 
All these masculine words are honest, the feminine version of all these words is morally degrading. So you can not, with Latin people, use the masculine version of a verb to explain its feminine version. And as I said, machinatrix, is a hapax found in the Medea of Seneca, and in its unic using it means not "engineer".
 
>>>The second meaning is that bad: "a contriver of plots". The female variant of this word is machinatrix, so Annia can use it. It is just because of the patriarchic ancient circumstances that a woman could not be engeneer.<<<
 
Of course, the honest Roman women did not work. But we can propose other words as Sollers, Ingeniosa...

>>>Marca Annia Megas Machinatrix is perfect, a bit long, but
never mind: Quintus Caecilius Metellus Pius Cornelianus Scipio Nasica Serapio would not mind it either. ;-)<<<
 
Yes, I did not question the number of names but, perhaps because I am from NRGallia, the choice of Moderatrix recalls me Astérix or Vercingetorix. ;o)
 
Optime vale.
 
C. Petronius Dexter
Flamen Portunalis
Quaestor praetorianus

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60513 From: marcushoratius Date: 2009-01-12
Subject: Pridie Eidus Ianuarias: Coriolanus, Veturina, and Volumnia
M. Moravius Piscinus Horatianus Quiritibus et omnibus salutem
plurimam dicit: Bene omnibus nobis

Hodie est die pristini Eidus Ianuarias; haec dies comitialis est:

Coriolanus, Veturina, and Volumnia

The first secession of the Romans, then, terminated as described. Now
many of the neighbouring tribes had taken advantage of the secession
to begin hostilities against them; but the Romans after their
reconciliation conducted vigorously and harmoniously the wars brought
by their enemies and conquered them all. It was at this time that in
the siege of Corioli they came within an ace of being driven from
their very camp; but a patrician, Gnaeus Marcius, showed his prowess
and repelled the assailants. For this he received various marks of
distinction and was given the title of Coriolanus from the people
which he had routed. For the time he was thus exalted, but not long
afterward he was anxious to be made praetor and failed, and therefore
became angry with the populace and evinced displeasure toward the
tribunes. Accordingly, the latter, whose office he was especially
eager to abolish, heaped up accusations against him, fixed upon him a
charge of aiming at tyranny, and exiled him from Rome. So, on being
expelled, he forthwith went over to the Volsci. ~ Cassius Dio 5.16
(Zonaris)

Leading an army of the Volsci and Latins against Rome, the Romans
were divided. The patricians determined to fight, while the plebeian
leaders questioned whether it was not better to give back land that
was wrongfully taken from the Volsci.

But the women, Volumnia, the wife of Coriolanus, and Veturina, his
mother, gathering a company of all the most distinguished matrons,
came to him in camp, bringing his children along with them. And while
the rest wept in silence, Veturina began: "We are not deserters, my
son, but in us the country has sent to you, if you should yield, your
mother and wife and children, but otherwise your spoil. And if even
now you still are angry, kill us first. Be reconciled and harbour no
longer your anger against your countrymen, your friends, your
temples, your tombs; do not take by storm your native place, in which
you were born, were reared, and became Coriolanus, bearer of this
great name. Send me not hence without result, unless you would behold
me dead by my own hand."

At the end of this speech she burst into tears, and tearing open her
clothing, bared her breasts, and touching her belly, exclaimed: "See,
my child, this brought you forth, these reared you up." When she had
thus spoken, his wife and children and the rest of the women joined
in the lament, so that he, too, was overcome with grief. Recovering
himself at length with difficulty, he embraced his mother, and
kissing her the whole, replied: "See, mother, I yield to you. Yours
is the victory, and to you let all the others ascribe this favour.
For I cannot endure even to see those men, who after receiving such
great benefits at my hands have treated me in such a way. Hence I
will never even enter the city. But do you keep your country instead
of me, since you have so wished it; and I will depart out of the way
of you all." With these words he withdrew. For, through fear of the
multitude and shame before his peers, in that he had ever undertaken
an expedition against them, he would not accept even the restoration
offered him, but retired among the Volsci, and there died, either as
the result of a plot or from old age. ~ Cassius Dio 5.18.7-12


Prohibitions on Sacerdotes Eating Beans

"It is not customary for the flamen Dialis to touch, or even to name,
a she-goat, raw flesh, ivy, or beans." ~ Aulus Gellius, Noctes
Atticae 10.15.12

"Why is the customary rule that those who are practicing holy living
must abstain from legumes? Did they, like the followers of
Pythagoras, religiously abstain from beans for the reasons which are
commonly offered, and from which vetch and chickpea suggest Lethe and
Erebus? Or is it rather because one must keep the body clean and
light for purposes of holy living and lustration?" ~ Plutarch,
Questiones Romanae 95

"In our ancient ceremonials, too, bean pottage (fabata) occupies its
place in the religious services of the Gods. Beans are mostly eaten
together with other food, but it is generally thought that they dull
the senses, and cause sleepless nights attended with dreams. Hence it
is that the bean has been condemned by Pythagoras; though, according
to some, the reason for this denunciation was the belief which he
entertained that the souls of the dead are enclosed in the bean: it
is for this reason, too, that beans are used in the funeral banquets
of the Parentalia. According to Varro, it is for a similar cause that
the Flamen abstains from eating beans: in addition to which, on the
blossom of the bean, there are certain letters of ill omen to be
found." ~ C. Plinius Secundus, Historia Naturalis 18.12

Beans were associated with the dead. We see Ovid offering beans to
the Manes at Lemuria, and as Pliny has it above, the meal prepared
for the Manes at Parentalia, and at other times, included beans. In
preparation for ritual one altered his diet, eliminating "heavy"
foods like beans, for those, like fruit, that give one a lighter
feeling."


The thought for today comes from L Annaesus Seneca, On Why, though
there is Providence, some Misfortunes befall Good Men 2.6:

"Toward good men God has the mind of a father, he cherishes for them
a manly love, and he says, 'Let them be harassed by toil, by
suffering, by losses, in order that they may gather true strength.'"
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60514 From: Kristoffer From Date: 2009-01-12
Subject: Re: Possible name change...thoughts
A. Tullia Scholastica wrote:
> > Marca Annia Megas Machinatrix is perect, a bit long, but never mind:
> > Quintus Caecilius Metellus Pius Cornelianus Scipio Nasica Serapio
> > would not mind it either. ;-)
>
> ATS: I hope that all of these do not belong to one person, though I
> know the first four do...

Salve,

They do, or at least did. He was Consul of Rome 52 BC.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metellus_Scipio

Wikipedia doesn't list Cornelianus, but it does mention that he was
adopted from gens Cornelia by the first bearer of those first four.

Vale, Titus Octavius Pius.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60515 From: José Bellissimo Date: 2009-01-12
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Alguém fala português? / Does anyone speak Portugu
Titus Arminius Genialis .
Meu nome é José Bellissimo.. Adoro Roma , sou integrante do grupo NOVA ROMA e seria ótimo poder participar do grupo Provincia do Brasil de Nova Roma . Moro em São Paulo e será ótimo poder partcipar do encontro de fevereiro, o problema será falar em latim.
Grato.
--- Em seg, 12/1/09, Titus Arminius Genialis <tagenialis@...> escreveu:
De: Titus Arminius Genialis <tagenialis@...>
Assunto: [Nova-Roma] Alguém fala português? / Does anyone speak Portuguese?
Para: newroman@yahoogroups.com, Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, nrbrasil@yahoogroups.com
Data: Segunda-feira, 12 de Janeiro de 2009, 3:10

LEG. PR. PR. BRASILIAE T. ARMINIUS GENIALIS CIVIBUS NOVAE ROMAE SPD
 
[Versão em português: / Please scroll down for English version]
 
Sou o governador provincial do Brasil, e gostaria de dar as boas-vindas a todos os novos cidadãos de Nova Roma falantes de português!
Se você ainda não entrou para os grupos provinciais, não deixe de fazê-lo, pois esta é a melhor forma de mantermos a comunicação com as pessoas que moram perto de nós...
 
Se você mora no Brasil, o seu grupo é http://groups. yahoo.com/ group/NRBrasil
Se você mora em Portugal, o seu grupo é http://groups. yahoo.com/ groups/NRHispani a
 
De qualquer maneira, em nome da Província do Brasil de Nova Roma, convido a todos os falantes de português, mesmo que não sejam brasileiros, a entrarem para o nosso grupo e participarem de nossas discussões!!
 
E se você, brasileiro, vive próximo a São Paulo, não perca o nosso encontro provincial, que está marcado para o início de fevereiro de 2009!!! Estaremos todos presentes em um restaurante típico romano, usando túnicas, togas e toda a vestimenta tradicional e (tentando) falar em latim!!
 
PARTICIPE!!! APROVEITE O QUE NOVA ROMA TEM A OFERECER!!!
 
 
TITUS ARMINIUS GENIALIS
Lictor Curiatus
Rogator
Legatus Pro Praetore Brasilia
Interpres Lusitanice
Scriba Censoris
tagenialis@yahoo. com.br
 
============ ========= ========= ========= ========= ======
 
LEG. PR. PR. BRASILIAE T. ARMINIUS GENIALIS CIVIBUS NOVAE ROMAE SPD
 
[English version]
 
I am provincial governor of Brazil and I would like to welcome all Portuguese-speaking Nova Roma new citizens!
If you did not subscribe to the provincial mailing lists, don't forget doing it, as this is the best way of communicate with people who live nearby...
 
If you live in Brazil, your group is http://groups. yahoo.com/ group/NRBrasil
If you live in Portugal, your group is http://groups. yahoo.com/ group/NRHispania
 
Anyway, on behalf of Provincia Brasilia, I invite all the Portuguese-speakers , even those who are not Brazilian, to subscribe to our group and take part of our discussions! !
 
And if you, Brazilian, do live near São Paulo city, don't lose our provincial meeting, scheduled for early February, 2009!!! We will all be present at a tipical restaurant, wearing tunics, togas and all the traditional clothes and also (at least trying to) speaking Latin!!
 
PARTICIPATE! !! ENJOY WHAT NOVA ROMA OFFERS YOU!!!
 
 
TITUS ARMINIUS GENIALIS
Lictor Curiatus
Rogator
Legatus Pro Praetore Brasilia
Interpres Lusitanice
Scriba Censoris
tagenialis@yahoo. com.br


Veja quais são os assuntos do momento no Yahoo! + Buscados: Top 10 - Celebridades - Música - Esportes
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60516 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2009-01-12
Subject: Hercules and the Cattle of Geryon
Cato omnes in foro SPD

Salvete!

"See, Hercules drives the Erythean cattle here:
Travelling a long track through the world:
And while he is entertained in the Tegean house,
The untended cattle wander the wide acres.
It was morning: woken from his sleep the Tyrinthian
Saw that two bulls were missing from the herd.
Seeking, he found no trace of the silently stolen beasts:
Fierce Cacus had dragged them backwards into his cave,
Cacus the infamous terror of the Aventine woods,
No slight evil to neighbours and travellers.
His aspect was grim, his body huge, with strength
To match: the monster's father was Mulciber.
He housed in a vast cavern with deep recesses,
So hidden the wild creatures could barely find it.
Over the entrance hung human arms and skulls,
And the ground bristled with whitened bones.
Jupiter's son was leaving, that part of his herd lost,
When the stolen cattle lowed loudly.
`I am recalled" he said, and following the sound,
As avenger, came through the woods to the evil cave,
Cacus had blocked the entrance with a piece of the hill:
Ten yoked oxen could scarcely have moved it.
Hercules leant with his shoulders, on which the world had rested,
And loosened that vast bulk with the pressure.
A crash that troubled the air followed its toppling,
And the ground subsided under the falling weight.
Cacus at first fought hand to hand, and waged war,
Ferociously, with logs and boulders.
When that failed, beaten, he tried his father's tricks
And vomited roaring flames from his mouth:
You'd think Typhoeus breathed at every blast,
And sudden flares were hurled from Etna's fires.
Hercules anticipated him, raised his triple-knotted club,
And swung it three, then four times, in his adversary's face.
Cacus fell, vomiting smoke mingled with blood,
And beat at the ground, in dying, with his chest.
The victor offered one of the bulls to you, Jupiter,
And invited Evander and his countrymen to the feast,
And himself set up an altar, called Maxima, the Mightiest,
Where that part of the city takes its name from an ox." - Ovid, Fasti I

"And the daughter of Ocean, Callirrhoe... bore a son who was the
strongest of all men, Geryones, whom mighty Heracles killed in
sea-girt Erythea for the sake of his shambling oxen." - Hesiod,
Theogony 980

"Answering him the mighty son of immortal Khrysaor and Kallirhoe [Geryon] said, `Do not
with talk of chilling death try to frighten my manly heart, nor (beg me) . . for if I am by
birth immortal and ageless, so that I shall share in life on Olympos, then it is better (to
endure) the reproaches . . and . . to watch my cattle being driven off far from my stalls;
but if, my friend, I must indeed reach hateful old age and spend my life amoing short-
lived mortals far from the blessed gods, then it is much nobler for me to suffer what is
fates than to avoid death and shower disgrace on my dear children and all my race
hereafter-I am Khrysaor's son. May this not be the wish of the blessed gods concerning
my cattle." - Stesichorus, Geryoneis Fragment S11

"It seems the man of those days made it their business to amass wealth of this kind, herds
of horses and cattle, if it is the case that . . . Eurystheus, in view of the reputation of the
Iberian cattle, ordered Herakles to drive off the herd of Geryones. Eryx too, who was
reigning in Sikelia (Sicily), plainly had so violent a desire for the cattle from Erytheia that
he wrestled with Herakles, staking his kingdom on the match against these cattle." - Pausanias, Description of Greece 4. 36. 3

On or about today the Romans celebrated one of the sidebars to the Twelve Labors of
Hercules. Hercules had been ordered to capture the cattle of Geryon, who lived in Erythea
on the westernmost edge of the ocean (Spain). Geryon was the son of Chrysaor, who was
himself born out of the body of the Medusa slain by Perseus, and Callihroe, the daughter
of the titans Tethys and Oceanus. Apparently he had wings, six arms, and six legs, but
still was no match for the hero. After killing Geryon, Hercules had to drag the herd across
Europe back to Greece.

Along the way, at Reghium a bull escaped, swam across the sea to Sicily, then on to the
nearest land. Since the local name for bull was "italus", the peninsula the bull escaped to
was named "Italy".

As Hercules was passing what would be the site of the City of Rome, he was robbed of
two of his cows by Cacus, a fire-breathing, human-eating monster living in a cave under
the Aventine Hill. Cacus, like Mercury before him, walked the two cows backwards into his
cave in an attempt to disguise his crime; it would have worked but as Hercules passed
near the cave the cows began to moo. Hercules killed Cacus (Vergil in Book VIII of the
Aenead says "et angit inhaerens elisos oculos et siccum sanguine guttur" (he squeezed his
head so hard his eyes popped out) and reclaimed his cows - and the site was later to
become the Forum Boarium, the cattle market of Rome.

Valete!

Cato
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60517 From: Colin Brodd Date: 2009-01-12
Subject: Internet Problems
C. Tullius Valerianus Germanicus omnibus S.P.D.
 
Greetings everyone! I am experiencing probolems with my home internet connection, and I'm told it may not be rectified until 1/16/09 or later! I'm going to try to get online at work on occasion, but if anyone is trying to reach me, it's going to be extremely problematic until about the 16th. Apologies to all.
___________________________________________________________________________________________________________
--
C. TVLLIVS VALERIANVS GERMANICVS

* Lictor Curiatus
* Pontifex Minor Sacris Populi Romani Faciundis
* Legatus Regionis Insulae Rhodensis (ab anno A.U.C. MMDCCLXI)
* Scriba ad Latinitatem (A.U.C. MMDCCLXII)
* Scriba Censoris Tiberii Galerii Paulini (A.U.C. MMDCCLXII)
* Ad Templum Diis Immortalibus Romae Aedificandum!

"Qua(e) patres difficillime
adepti sunt nolite
turpiter relinquere" -
Monumentum Bradfordis, Tamaropoli, in civitate Massaciuseta
(Bradford Monument, Plymouth, MA)

Check out my books on Goodreads: <a href="http://www.goodreads.com/profile/Valerianus?utm_source=email_widget">http://www.goodreads.com/profile/Valerianus</a>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60518 From: Cn. Cornelius Lentulus Date: 2009-01-12
Subject: Re: R: [Nova-Roma] Re: Possible name change...thoughts
Lentulus C. Dextro suo sal.


>>> You know that it is a Latin tradition, I do not know the English tradition, that masculine word of jobs are full of praise, but the same jobs at their feminine version are full of shame. Because, of course, the vulgar tradition knows only one job to the women, and I guess you understand me. <<<


Yes, I fully understand you. It is entirely true for the ancient Roman times. But is it a tradition worthy to continue? I think today Latin words should mean some other things (in some cases) than they meant in the antiquity.
 

>>> All these masculine words are honest, the feminine version of all these words is morally degrading. So you can not, with Latin people, use the masculine version of a verb to explain its feminine version. <<<


The verb "machinari" has no gender. It is not a "masculine version of a verb". From "machinari" one can equally form a noun "machinator" (male) and "machinatrix". (female). We also use "praetrix", "quaestrix", "senatrix". All these are our neologisms: I think that same aplies to "machinatrix".

 
>>> Of course, the honest Roman women did not work. But we can propose other words as Sollers, Ingeniosa... <<<


Remember that keeping as much part of Annia's name as possible is also point to observe. If it is possible, a name taken as one's Roman name must remain for life. Changes can be justified if there is adoption, granted agnomen... or if the name is not correct Latin and does not follow any rule. In our case, Machinatrix is within the requirements.

An additional note: Roman cognomina were usually insulting rather than complimentary. So having a cognomen with a *bad* connotation is exactly that kind of thing that we recommand.


>>> Yes, I did not question the number of names but, perhaps because I am from NRGallia, the choice of Moderatrix recalls me Astérix or Vercingetorix. ;o) <<<


I would say it is not even a choice. She has this name since almost 10 years, so it *is* her Roman name and since it is not bad Latin it should not be allowed to be changed. Her name since years was "Annia Ulleria Machinatrix". This was not good according to the classical onomastic rules. She had two nomina gentilicia, and one of them was her husband's name that may suggest incest. "Ulleria" deleted, reamains "Annia Machinatrix". She needs a praenomen: takes "Marca". As she was not obliged to change her name, she does this as a courtesy to our new rules, as a honorification of the ancients, so she is allowed to make additional minor changes in her name, such as adding "Megas" as her other cognomen because it is her macronational name: and we support and encourage taking macronational Latinized names as cognomen.

This is the story of the case.
 


Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60519 From: Cn. Cornelius Lentulus Date: 2009-01-12
Subject: Re: R: [Nova-Roma] Re: Possible name change...thoughts
Lentulus Tulliae suae sal.


>>>> "Marca Annia Megas Machinatrix is perect, a bit long, but never mind:
Quintus Caecilius Metellus Pius Cornelianus Scipio Nasica Serapio would not mind it either. ;-)"


    ATS:  I hope that all of these do not belong to one person, though I know the first four do...<<<


But yes. He was known briefly as Metellus Scipio. A man from the family of the Cornelii Scipiones Nasicae Serapiones, that was a sub-branch of the Scipiones Nasicae ehich was again a sub-branch of the Scipio family. He was later adopted into the Metelli Pii, so hence the lots of cognomina. Some reserved their all previous cognomina after adoption,some none. Yes, there were such a long names.

PS.: I just received again notifications from your mailbox that you can't receive my private messages...

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60520 From: Complutensis Date: 2009-01-12
Subject: EDICTUM CONSULAREM CURIATI IULI III: DE CREATIONE ACCENSORUM
Attachments :
    Ex hoc:
    •Cn. Caelius Ahenobarbus •Fr. Apulus Caesar •T. Flavius Aquila
    accensi creantur.
    Nullum ius iurandum poscetur. Hoc edictum statim valet.
    Datum sub manu nostra pr. Id. Ian. ‡
    <http://www.novaroma.org/nr/Roman_dates> M. Curiatio M. Iulio cos. ‡
    <http://www.novaroma.org/nr/Consular_Years_%28Nova_Roma%29> MMDCCLXII
    <http://www.novaroma.org/nr/MMDCCLXII> a.u.c.
    <http://www.novaroma.org/nr/AUC>


    By this edict, we the consuls both appoint citizens:
    •Cn. Caelius Ahenobarbus •Fr. Apulus Caesar •T. Flavius Aquila
    as accensii of joint Consular Cohort together with all the obligations and
    privileges prescribed by the laws of Nova Roma.
    No oath shall be required. This edict takes effect immediately.
    Given under our hands this twelve day of January 2762 a.U.c (AD 2009) in the
    consulships of M. Curiatius and M. Iulius.


    Por este edicto, nosotros los consules, nombramos a los siguientes
    ciudadanos:
    •Cn. Caelius Ahenobarbus •Fr. Apulus Caesar •T. Flavius Aquila
    accensii de nuestra Cohorte Consular.
    No se requiere juramento. Este edicto será efectivo inmediatamente.
    Dado por nuestras manos en este decimosegunso dia de Enero de 2762 a.U.c (AD
    2009) en el consulado de M. Curiatius and M. Iulius.

    Per questo editto, noi i consoli, nominiamo i seguenti cittadini:
    •Cn. Caelius Ahenobarbus •Fr. Apulus Caesar •T. Flavius Aquila
    accensii della nostra Cohorte Consolare.
    Non é richiesto giuramento. Questo editto sará efettivo inmediatamente.
    Dato il dodicesimo giorno di Gennaio 2762 a.U.c (AD 2009) nel consulato di
    M. Curiatius and M. Iulius.

    M. Curiatius Complutensis
    M. Iulius Severus

    Se certificó que el correo saliente no contiene virus.
    Comprobada por AVG - http://www.avg.es
    Versión: 8.0.176 / Base de datos de virus: 270.10.5/1886 - Fecha de la
    versión: 10/01/2009 18:01
    Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60521 From: Cocceius Spinula Date: 2009-01-12
    Subject: Re: EDICTUM CONSULAREM CURIATI IULI III: DE CREATIONE ACCENSORUM
    Tradução Portuguesa | Portuguese Translation

    "
    Por este édito, nós os cônsules, nomeamos os seguintes
    cidadãos:
    •Cn. Caelius Ahenobarbus •Fr. Apulus Caesar •T. Flavius Aquila
    accensii da nossa Cohorte Consular, juntamente com todas as obrigações e
    privilégios previstos pela legislação de Nova Roma.
    Não é requerido um juramento. Este édito terá efeito imediato.
    Dado pelas nossas mãos neste decimo segundo dia de Janeiro de 2762 a.U.c (AD
    2009) no consulado de M. Curiatius e M. Iulius.
    "

    C. Cocceius Spinula
    Provincia Hispania, Lusitania
    Accensus Consulum et Procurator Regionis Lusitaniae

    --- Complutensis wrote: 

    Ex hoc:
    •Cn. Caelius Ahenobarbus •Fr. Apulus Caesar •T. Flavius Aquila
    accensi creantur.
    Nullum ius iurandum poscetur. Hoc edictum statim valet.
    Datum sub manu nostra pr. Id. Ian. ‡
    <http://www.novaroma .org/nr/Roman_ dates> M. Curiatio M. Iulio cos. ‡
    <http://www.novaroma .org/nr/Consular _Years_%28Nova_ Roma%29> MMDCCLXII
    <http://www.novaroma .org/nr/MMDCCLXI I> a.u.c.
    <http://www.novaroma .org/nr/AUC>

    By this edict, we the consuls both appoint citizens:
    •Cn. Caelius Ahenobarbus •Fr. Apulus Caesar •T. Flavius Aquila
    as accensii of joint Consular Cohort together with all the obligations and
    privileges prescribed by the laws of Nova Roma.
    No oath shall be required. This edict takes effect immediately.
    Given under our hands this twelve day of January 2762 a.U.c (AD 2009) in the
    consulships of M. Curiatius and M. Iulius.

    Por este edicto, nosotros los consules, nombramos a los siguientes
    ciudadanos:
    •Cn. Caelius Ahenobarbus •Fr. Apulus Caesar •T. Flavius Aquila
    accensii de nuestra Cohorte Consular.
    No se requiere juramento. Este edicto será efectivo inmediatamente.
    Dado por nuestras manos en este decimosegunso dia de Enero de 2762 a.U.c (AD
    2009) en el consulado de M. Curiatius and M. Iulius.

    Per questo editto, noi i consoli, nominiamo i seguenti cittadini:
    •Cn. Caelius Ahenobarbus •Fr. Apulus Caesar •T. Flavius Aquila
    accensii della nostra Cohorte Consolare.
    Non é richiesto giuramento. Questo editto sará efettivo inmediatamente.
    Dato il dodicesimo giorno di Gennaio 2762 a.U.c (AD 2009) nel consulato di
    M. Curiatius and M. Iulius.

    M. Curiatius Complutensis
    M. Iulius Severus


    Recent Activity
    Visit Your Group
    Yahoo! News

    Fashion News

    What's the word on

    fashion and style?

    Drive Traffic

    Sponsored Search

    can help increase

    your site traffic.

    Yahoo! Groups

    Going Green Zone

    Learn to go green.

    Save energy. Save the planet.

    .


    Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60522 From: Titus Flavius Aquila Date: 2009-01-12
    Subject: EDICTUM CONSULAREM CURIATI IULI III: DE CREATIONE ACCENSORUM
    Attachments :
      German translation / Deutsche Ãœbersetzung:
      Durch dieses Edikt, ernennen wir, die beiden Konsuln, folgende Bürger:
      •Cn. Caelius Ahenobarbus •Fr. Apulus Caesar •T. Flavius Aquila
      zu accensii der vereinten Consular Cohort mit allen Verpflichtungen und
      Privilegien wie vorgeschrieben durch das Gesetz von Nova Roma.
      Kein Eid ist erforderlich.Dieses Edikt tritt sofort in Kraft.
      Erlassen unter unseren Händen diesen 12. Tag des Januar 2762 a.U.c (AD2009)
      im Konsulat von M.Curiatus und M.Iulius .
       
      T. Flavius Aquila
      Accensus Consulum
       
       
      Ex hoc:
      •Cn.. Caelius Ahenobarbus •Fr. Apulus Caesar •T. Flavius Aquila
      accensi creantur.
      Nullum ius iurandum poscetur. Hoc edictum statim valet.
      Datum sub manu nostra pr. Id. Ian. ‡
      <http://www.novaroma .org/nr/Roman_ dates> M.. Curiatio M. Iulio cos. ‡
      <http://www.novaroma .org/nr/Consular _Years_%28Nova_ Roma%29> MMDCCLXII
      <http://www.novaroma .org/nr/MMDCCLXI I> a.u.c.
      <http://www.novaroma .org/nr/AUC>

      By this edict, we the consuls both appoint citizens:
      •Cn. Caelius Ahenobarbus •Fr. Apulus Caesar •T. Flavius Aquila
      as accensii of joint Consular Cohort together with all the obligations and
      privileges prescribed by the laws of Nova Roma.
      No oath shall be required. This edict takes effect immediately.
      Given under our hands this twelve day of January 2762 a.U.c (AD 2009) in the
      consulships of M. Curiatius and M. Iulius.
      M. Curiatius Complutensis
      M. Iulius Severus
       

      Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60523 From: Complutensis Date: 2009-01-12
      Subject: EDCTUM CONSULARE IV: Call for governors
      Attachments :
        Ex officio consularis.

        I. In conformity with Nova Roma Constitution V. C:

        "The Senate may, by Senatus Consultum, create provinciae for administrative
        purposes and appoint provincial governors therefore, who shall bear such
        titles as the Senate may deem appropriate. The Senate may review each
        governor on a yearly basis and it remains in the discretion of the Senate
        whether or not to prorogue such governors, although this review shall not
        constitute a ban on the authority of the Senate to remove governors from
        office as its discretion. Governors shall have the following honors, powers,
        and obligations:

        1.To hold imperium and have the honor of being preceded by six lictors
        solely within the jurisdiction of their respective provinciae;
        2. To proclaim those edicta (edicts) necessary to engage in those tasks
        which advance the mission and function of Nova Roma, solely within the
        jurisdiction of their provinciae (such edicts being binding upon themselves
        as well as others);
        3. To manage the day-to-day organization and administration of their
        provinciae;
        4. To appoint officers to whom authority may be delegated, subject to those
        restrictions and standards as the Senate shall deem appropriate;
        5. To remove officers whom they have appointed, or make changes to their
        titles and/or delegated authority, subject to those restrictions and
        standards as the Senate shall deem appropriate."

        I call for candidates to stand for the office of governor of Nova Roman
        provinces. The Nova Roman Senate will appoint the governors at its own
        discretion during the Senate session in February.

        II. Candidates should be citizens, assiduii and meet all the requirements
        stipulated by the laws of Nova Roma:

        http://tinyurl.com.au/x.php?ifr
        http://tinyurl.com.au/x.php?6de

        The statement of governors who indicated in the annual report to Senate
        their wish to be prorogued for another term of office is already registered.

        Citizens who apply for governorship for the first time must present in their
        statement of candidacy a brief description of their activities and
        experience within Nova Roma.

        III. Nova Roma provinces list can be found at this address:

        http://www.novaroma.org/nr/Provincia_%28Nova_Roma%29

        I ask if the current governors of the following provinces want to continue
        in office:

        - America Medioccidentalis Superior.
        - Asia Citerior.
        - Australia.
        - Brasilia.
        - Britannia.
        - Italia.
        - Pannonia.


        I encourage citizens from the following provinces without governor to
        contact the consuls for more information. These provinces are:

        - America Austroccidentalis.
        - America Boreoccidentalis.
        - California.
        - Canada Citerior.
        - Venedia.
        - Lacus Magni.
        - Hibernia.

        IV. I accept statements of candidacy beginning today, 12 of January until
        31 of January, 24.00 Roma time, 2762 a.U.c.

        Send your statement of candidacy to this address:

        Consuls@novaroma.org
        <http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma/post?postID=NKJP4XnZ1iM66KmZH1s8Q5J
        0MLs9JCPEVNNd6gUqu9KdpC4SoEX86_UXGeB4FvINrvo_BREdsD_lQbHMMKo>

        The governor of a province is the first person in contact with citizens from
        province. Together with his citizens a governor can transform a province in
        a very active one, organizing real events and meetings, developing local and
        inter-provinces projects, contacting public institutions or organizations
        with roman related
        interest and, of course, raising citizens.




        M·CVR·COMPLVTENSIS
        Consul Novae Romae

        Senator
        Consul Hispaniae
        Se certificó que el correo saliente no contiene virus.
        Comprobada por AVG - http://www.avg.es
        Versión: 8.0.176 / Base de datos de virus: 270.10.6/1888 - Fecha de la
        versión: 12/01/2009 7:04
        Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60524 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2009-01-12
        Subject: Re: R: [Nova-Roma] Re: Possible name change...thoughts
        Re: R: [Nova-Roma] Re: Possible name change...thoughts
        Scholastica Lentulo suo S.P.D.
         

        Lentulus Tulliae suae sal.


        >>>> "Marca Annia Megas Machinatrix is perect, a bit long, but never mind: Quintus Caecilius Metellus Pius Cornelianus Scipio Nasica Serapio would not mind it either. ;-)"

            ATS:  I hope that all of these do not belong to one person, though I know the first four do...<<<


        But yes. He was known briefly as Metellus Scipio. A man from the family of the Cornelii Scipiones Nasicae Serapiones, that was a sub-branch of the Scipiones Nasicae ehich was again a sub-branch of the Scipio family. He was later adopted into the Metelli Pii, so hence the lots of cognomina. Some reserved their all previous cognomina after adoption,some none. Yes, there were such a long names.

            ATS2:  The stonemasons must have appreciated the extra pay they got for carving such long names...

        PS.: I just received again notifications from your mailbox that you can't receive my private messages...

            ATS2:  I did receive a message from a US student using the Yahoo mail (albeit after a bounce), but I guess you Europeans are beyond the pale.  We will have to use the intermediary I suggested, though I must confirm that.  Si Latine scribas, omnia privata sint.  Conor scholas nostras movere propterea quod servitor nondum operatur; per mensem non operatus est, nec nuntius nos quid agatur certiores fecit.  Nec discipuli nec praeceptores eis curae sunt; omnia pessum eunt.  
         

         Vale quam optime!  
         
              
           Messages in this topic           <http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma/message/60461
        Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60525 From: Stefn Ullerius Venator Piperbarbus Date: 2009-01-12
        Subject: Request submitted, was Re: Possible name change...thoughts
        Avete Omnes;

        Thank you all so much for your advice on this matter; public and private.

        This has been, and I hope it continues to be, one of the more
        dignified and informative discussions we have had on the Main List.
        Such conversations are golden moments in our history, I think.

        Please, continue on in this vein.

        My fellow Cives, if you have question about the Roman nature of your
        names, please ask and help this thread to continue.

        As I stated yesterday, my wife and I did send a formal request to the
        Censors about a name change today.

        In spes - - -

        Marca Annia Megas Machinatrix alias Annia Ulleria Machinatrix

        Publius Ullerius Stephanus Venator alias Stephanus Ullerius Venator
        Piperbarbus (Piperbarbatus ,-)
        Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60526 From: Q. Valerius Poplicola Date: 2009-01-12
        Subject: R: [Nova-Roma] Re: Possible name change...thoughts
        Eheu! Omnia non erunt priuata!

        --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "A. Tullia Scholastica"
        <fororom@...> wrote:
        >
        > > Scholastica Lentulo suo S.P.D.
        > >
        > >
        > > Lentulus Tulliae suae sal.
        > >
        > >
        > >>>>> >>>> "Marca Annia Megas Machinatrix is perect, a bit long, but
        never mind:
        > >>>>> Quintus Caecilius Metellus Pius Cornelianus Scipio Nasica
        Serapio would
        > >>>>> not mind it either. ;-)"
        > >
        > > ATS: I hope that all of these do not belong to one person,
        though I know
        > > the first four do...<<<
        > >
        > >
        > > But yes. He was known briefly as Metellus Scipio. A man from the
        family of the
        > > Cornelii Scipiones Nasicae Serapiones, that was a sub-branch of
        the Scipiones
        > > Nasicae ehich was again a sub-branch of the Scipio family. He was
        later
        > > adopted into the Metelli Pii, so hence the lots of cognomina. Some
        reserved
        > > their all previous cognomina after adoption,some none. Yes, there
        were such a
        > > long names.
        > >
        > > ATS2: The stonemasons must have appreciated the extra pay
        they got for
        > > carving such long names...
        > >
        > > PS.: I just received again notifications from your mailbox that
        you can't
        > > receive my private messages...
        > >
        > > ATS2: I did receive a message from a US student using the
        Yahoo mail
        > > (albeit after a bounce), but I guess you Europeans are beyond the
        pale. We
        > > will have to use the intermediary I suggested, though I must
        confirm that. Si
        > > Latine scribas, omnia privata sint. Conor scholas nostras movere
        propterea
        > > quod servitor nondum operatur; per mensem non operatus est, nec
        nuntius nos
        > > quid agatur certiores fecit. Nec discipuli nec praeceptores eis
        curae sunt;
        > > omnia pessum eunt.
        > >>
        > >
        > > Vale quam optime!
        > >
        > >
        > > Messages in this topic
        > > <http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma/message/60461
        >
        Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60527 From: Titus Arminius Genialis Date: 2009-01-12
        Subject: EDICTUM CONSULARE IV: Convocação para governadores
        Attachments :
          >Ex officio consularis.
          >
          >I. Em conformidade com a Constituição de Nova Roma, item V. C:
          >
          >"O Senado pode, por Senatus Consultum, criar províncias para fins
          administrativos e nomear governadores provinciais, que usarão os títulos que
          o Senado considerar apropriados. O Senado poderá analisar cada governador
          anualmente e será responsabilidade unicamente do Senado prorrogar ou não o
          mandato de cada governador. Entretanto, essa revisão anual não constituirá
          uma forma de banimento àqueles governadores que forem removidos de seu
          cargo. Os governadores terão as seguintes honras, poderes e obrigações:
          >
          >1. Possuir imperium e ter a honra de ser precedido por seis lictores
          unicamente na jurisdição de suas respectivas províncias;
          >2. Proclamar os éditos necessários para o desenvolvimento das tarefas que
          farão avançar a missão e a função de Nova Roma, unicamente dentro da
          jurisdição de suas províncias;
          >3. Gerenciar a organização e a administração de suas províncias;
          >4. Nomear funcionários a quem poderão ser delegadas funções sujeitas às
          restrições e aos padrões que o Senado determinar convenientes;
          >5. Remover do cargo funcionários que tenham nomeado, ou modificar seus
          títulos e/ou funções delegadas, sujeitas às restrições e aos padrões que o
          Senado determinar convenientes."
          >
          >Convoco candidatos aos cargos de governadores das províncias de Nova Roma.
          O Senado de Nova Roma nomeará os governadores conforme sua conveniência
          durante a sessão de fevereiro.
          >
          >II. Os candidatos deverão ser cidadãos, assidui e cumprir os pré-requisitos
          estipulados pelas leis de Nova Roma:
          >
          >http://tinyurl.com.au/x.php?ifr
          >http://tinyurl.com.au/x.php?6de
          >
          >A declaração dos governadores que indicaram em seus relatórios anuais ao
          Senado que desejam ser prorrogados no cargo por mais um período, já têm suas
          declarações registradas.
          >
          Os cidadãos que solicitarem candidatura para governos provinciais pela
          primeira vez precisam manifestar suas declarações juntamente com um pequeno
          resumo de sua atividade anterior e experiência em Nova Roma.
          >
          >III. A lista de províncias de Nova Roma pode ser encontrada no seguinte
          endereço:
          >
          >http://www.novaroma.org/nr/Provincia_%28Nova_Roma%29
          >
          Pergunto se os seguintes governadores provinciais desejam permanecer no
          cargo:

          >- America Medioccidentalis Superior.
          >- Asia Citerior.
          >- Australia.
          >- Brasilia.
          >- Britannia.
          >- Italia.
          >- Pannonia.
          >
          >
          Estimulo os cidadãos das seguintes províncias, atualmente sem governadores,
          que entrem em contato com os cônsules para mais informações. As províncias
          são:
          >
          >- America Austroccidentalis.
          >- America Boreoccidentalis.
          >- California.
          >- Canada Citerior.
          >- Venedia.
          >- Lacus Magni.
          >- Hibernia.
          >
          >IV. Aceitarei pedidos de candidatura a partir de hoje, 12 de janeiro, até
          31 de janeiro de 2762 a.u.c., às 24h no horário de RomaI.
          >
          >Envie sua declaração de cidadania para:
          >
          >Consuls@novaroma.org
          <http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma/post?postID=NKJP4XnZ1iM66KmZH1s8Q5J
          0MLs9JCPEVNNd6gUqu9KdpC4SoEX86_UXGeB4FvINrvo_BREdsD_lQbHMMKo>
          >
          >O governador da província é a primeira pessoa em contato com os cidadãos de
          sua província. Junto com os cidadãos, o governador pode tornar a província
          muito ativa, organizando eventos e encontros no mundo real, realizando
          projetos locais e interprovinciais, entrando em contato com instituições
          públicas e organizações relacionadas a cultura romana e, é claro, promovendo
          para conseguir novos cidadãos.
          >
          >
          >
          >
          >M·CVR·COMPLVTENSIS
          >Consul Novae Romae
          >
          >Senator
          >Consul Hispaniae
          >
          >
          [Traduzido pelo Interpres T. Arminius Genialis. O documento oficial é a
          versão original em inglês.]
          [Translated by Interpres T. Arminius Genialis. The official document is the
          original version in English.]

          Internal Virus Database is out of date.
          Checked by AVG.
          Version: 8.0.100 / Virus Database: 270.9.19/1859 - Release Date: 12/20/2008
          2:34 PM
          Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60528 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2009-01-12
          Subject: Re: R: [Nova-Roma] Re: Possible name change...thoughts
          Re: R: [Nova-Roma] Re: Possible name change...thoughts
          Scholastica Poplicolae S.P.D.
           

          Eheu! Omnia non erunt priuata!

              ATS:  Not here, to be sure.  Nulla hoc in foro privata.  Si Sanskritice Siniceve scribamus, aliquis omnia legere possit.  In animo habui amicum ut viam mediam adhibeamus, non forum publicum!  

          Vale.  

          --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com <mailto:Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com> , "A. Tullia Scholastica"
          <fororom@...> wrote:
          >
          > >  Scholastica Lentulo suo S.P.D.
          > >  
          > >
          > > Lentulus Tulliae suae sal.
          > >
          > >
          > >>>>> >>>> "Marca Annia Megas Machinatrix is perect, a bit long, but
          never mind:
          > >>>>> Quintus Caecilius Metellus Pius Cornelianus Scipio Nasica
          Serapio would
          > >>>>> not mind it either. ;-)"
          > >
          > >     ATS:  I hope that all of these do not belong to one person,
          though I know
          > > the first four do...<<<
          > >
          > >
          > > But yes. He was known briefly as Metellus Scipio. A man from the
          family of the
          > > Cornelii Scipiones Nasicae Serapiones, that was a sub-branch of
          the Scipiones
          > > Nasicae ehich was again a sub-branch of the Scipio family. He was
          later
          > > adopted into the Metelli Pii, so hence the lots of cognomina. Some
          reserved
          > > their all previous cognomina after adoption,some none. Yes, there
          were such a
          > > long names.
          > >
          > >     ATS2:  The stonemasons must have appreciated the extra pay
          they got for
          > > carving such long names...
          > >
          > > PS.: I just received again notifications from your mailbox that
          you can't
          > > receive my private messages...
          > >
          > >     ATS2:  I did receive a message from a US student using the
          Yahoo mail
          > > (albeit after a bounce), but I guess you Europeans are beyond the
          pale.  We
          > > will have to use the intermediary I suggested, though I must
          confirm that.  Si
          > > Latine scribas, omnia privata sint.  Conor scholas nostras movere
          propterea
          > > quod servitor nondum operatur; per mensem non operatus est, nec
          nuntius nos
          > > quid agatur certiores fecit.  Nec discipuli nec praeceptores eis
          curae sunt;
          > > omnia pessum eunt.
          > >>   
          > >
          > >  Vale quam optime!
          > >  
          > >       
          > >    Messages in this topic
          > > <http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma/message/60461
          >

           
                
             Messages in this topic           <http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma/message/60461
          Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60529 From: Gnaeus Iulius Caesar Date: 2009-01-12
          Subject: CURULE AEDILE EDICT 62-01: APPOINTMENT OF SCRIBAE
          Cn. Iulius Caesar aed. Quiritibus sal.

          CURULE AEDILE EDICT 62-01: APPOINTMENT OF SCRIBAE

          I hereby appoint the following scribes, to be divided between five
          work groups within the Cohors Aedilicia. No oath is required of them.
          Further appointments may follow.

          Marcus Aelius Severus
          Gaius Aemilius Crassus
          Publius Aemilius Lepidus
          Titus Annaeus Regulus
          Gnaeus Caelius Ahenobarbus
          Gaia Aurelia Falco Silvana
          Lucius Fidelius Lusitanus
          Gaius Flavius Ductoris
          Lucius Iulius Regulus
          Lucia Marcia Ralla
          Gaius Marcius Crispus
          Sextus Postumius Albus
          Decimus Scribonius Severus
          Quintus Servilius Priscus
          Gaius Terentius Varro
          Stephanus Ullerius Venator Piperbarbus
          Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60530 From: Gaius Petronius Dexter Date: 2009-01-13
          Subject: Re: EDICTUM CONSULAREM CURIATI IULI III: DE CREATIONE ACCENSORUM
          
          French version of the edict.
           
          Par cet édit:
          •Cn. Caelius Ahenobarbus •Fr. Apulus Caesar  •T. Flavius Aquila
          sont nommés accensi.
          Ils n'ont pas a prêter serment.
          Cet édit est applicable dès maintenant.
          Fait par nous mêmes le 12 janvier 2762 auc, sous le consulat de M. Curiatius et M. Julius.

          Par cet édit, nous les deux consuls nommons les citoyens :
          •Cn. Caelius Ahenobarbus •Fr. Apulus Caesar  •T. Flavius Aquila
          accensi de la cohorte consulaire avec tous les devoirs et privilèges prévus par les lois de Nova Roma.
          Pas besoin de serment.
          Cet édit prend effet immédiatement.
          Fait le douzième jour de janvier 2762 a.V.c (AD 2009) sous le consulat de M. Curiatius et M. Julius.
           
          C. Petronius Dexter
          French interpreter.
           
          De : Complutensis <complutensis@...>
          À : Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com; novaroma-announce@yahoogroups.com
          Envoyé le : Lundi, 12 Janvier 2009, 19h30mn 20s
          Objet : [Nova-Roma] EDICTUM CONSULAREM CURIATI IULI III: DE CREATIONE ACCENSORUM


          Ex hoc:
          •Cn. Caelius Ahenobarbus •Fr. Apulus Caesar  •T. Flavius Aquila
          accensi creantur.
          Nullum ius iurandum poscetur. Hoc edictum statim valet.
          Datum sub manu nostra pr. Id. Ian. ‡
          <http://www.novaroma.org/nr/Roman_dates>  M. Curiatio M. Iulio cos. ‡
          <http://www.novaroma.org/nr/Consular_Years_%28Nova_Roma%29>  MMDCCLXII
          <http://www.novaroma.org/nr/MMDCCLXII>  a.u.c.
          <http://www.novaroma.org/nr/AUC


          By this edict, we the consuls both appoint citizens:
          •Cn. Caelius Ahenobarbus •Fr. Apulus Caesar  •T. Flavius Aquila
          as accensii of joint Consular Cohort together with all the obligations and
          privileges prescribed by the laws of Nova Roma.
          No oath shall be required. This edict takes effect immediately.
          Given under our hands this twelve day of January 2762 a.U.c (AD 2009) in the
          consulships of M. Curiatius and M. Iulius.



          Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60531 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2009-01-13
          Subject: Re: Possible name change...thoughts
          Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: Possible name change...thoughts
          A. Tullia Scholastica T. Octavio Pio quiritibus, sociis, peregrinisque bonae voluntatis S.P.D.
           

          A. Tullia Scholastica wrote:
          > > Marca Annia Megas Machinatrix is perect, a bit long, but never mind:
          > > Quintus Caecilius Metellus Pius Cornelianus Scipio Nasica Serapio
          > > would not mind it either. ;-)
          >
          >  ATS:  I hope that all of these do not belong to one person, though I
          >  know the first four do...

          Salve,

          They do, or at least did. He was Consul of Rome 52 BC.

          http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metellus_Scipio

          Wikipedia doesn't list Cornelianus, but it does mention that he was
          adopted from gens Cornelia by the first bearer of those first four.

              ATS:  Thank you very much for the reference.  I must say that I am delighted to learn you are alive, and that Thule is apparently not so frozen that all of its inhabitants have perished, as one might conjecture from the lack of response to one’s urgent inquiries regarding the health of a certain bit of hardware.  Do you perchance have any information on this matter?   We have had to scramble to provide substitutes.    

          Vale, Titus Octavius Pius.

           Vale, et valete.
                
             Messages in this topic           <http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma/message/60461
          Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60532 From: MCC Date: 2009-01-13
          Subject: EDICTO CONSULAR IV: Candidatos para governadores
          Los Consules han hecho,  mediante el Edicto Consular nº IV, una llamada a las personas interesadas en ser governadores de las siguientes provincias que aún no tienen un governador designado:

          >- America Austroccidentalis.
          
          >- America Boreoccidentalis. >- California. >- Canada Citerior. >- Venedia. >- Lacus Magni. >- Hibernia.
          Asimismo preguntan a los governadores de las provincias relacionadas a continuación si desean ser prorrogados en el cargo:
          >- America Medioccidentalis Superior. >- Asia Citerior. >- Australia. >- Brasilia. >- Britannia. >- Italia. >- Pannonia.
          Las demás provincias de Nova Roma no relacionadas arriba ya tiene governador que ha solicitado que se les prorrogue en el cargo. Cualquier ciudadano assidui con 21 años de edad o más y más de 9 meses de ciudadanía puede optar a ser governador de su provincia, para ello basta remitir un mail a los consules (consuls@...) declarando su candidatura junto a un breve relato de proyectos y actividades en Nova Roma. La designación de los governadores provinciales es prerrogativa del Senado de Nova Roma, por lo que los candidatos a governador serán propuestos por los Consules en la reunión del Senado que se celebrará en Febrero.

          Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60533 From: marcushoratius Date: 2009-01-13
          Subject: EIDUS IANUARIAE: feriae Iove; Caesar advances on Rome
          M. Moravius Piscinus Horatianus cultoribus Deorum, Quiritibus et
          omnibus salutem plurimam dicit: Di vos semper servent.

          Hodie est Eidus Iamuariae; haec dies nefastus piaculum est: feriae
          Iovi.

          "Lady of Night, bi-horned, lover of nightlong revels, shine, O Moon,
          shine, darting through the latticed windows; shed thy splendour on
          golden Callistion; thine immortality may look down unbidden on the
          deeds of lovers; thou dost bless both her and me, I know, O Moon; for
          thy soul too was fired by Endymion." ~ Philodemus, Moonlight, Greek
          Anthology XL


          "The worship of Juno demands the ausonian calends; on the Ides, a
          white ewe, of good size, falls in honor of Jupiter." ~ Ovidius Naso,
          Fasti 1.55-56

          "Why have they in the month three beginnings or fixed points, and do
          not adopt the same interval of days between them? Is it, as Juba and
          his followers relate, that on the Kalends the officials used to call
          the people and announce the Nones for the fifth day thereafter,
          regarding the Ides as a holy day? Or is it rather because, since they
          measured time by the phases of the moon, they observed that in each
          month the moon undergoes three very important changes: first, when
          she is hidden by her conjunction with the sun; second, when she has
          escaped the sun's rays and becomes visible for the first time at
          sunset; and third, at the full moon, when her orb is completely
          round? The disappearance and concealment of the moon they call
          Kalendae, for everything concealed or secret is clam, and "to be
          concealed" is celari. The first appearance of the moon they call
          Nones, the most accurate since it is the new moon: for their word
          for "new" and "novel" is the same as ours. They name the Ides as they
          do either because of the beauty and form (eidos) of the full-orbed
          moon, or by derivation from a title of Jupiter. But we must not
          follow out the most exact calculation of the number of days nor cast
          aspersions on approximate reckoning; since even now, when astronomy
          has made so much progress, the irregularity of the moon's movements
          is still beyond the skill of mathematicians, and continues to elude
          their calculations." ~ Plutarch, Roman Questions 24


          The calendar of Romulus consisted of ten lunar months, each month
          beginning with the first sliver of the New Moon seen just after
          sunset. On the calends a pontifex would announce from the Curia
          Calabra of the Capitolium on what day the Nones would occur, either
          on the fifth or seventh of each month. The people left their fields
          and came to see the Rex Sacrorum announce from the Arx when the other
          holidays of the month would arrive. The Nones are on the day of the
          First Quarter Moon, and eight days later, on the Ides, appears the
          Full Moon. Its name was said to have come from either Etruscan Itus
          or Sabine Idus, who was identified with Jupiter Fiducia (Varro,
          Lingua Latinae 6.28; Macrobius, Saturnalia 1.15.14). On the Ides of
          each month the flamen Dialis led a white ewe, called an idulis, in
          procession along the Via Sacra to the Capitolium where she was
          sacrificed to Jupiter. Normally it might seem unusual that a female
          victim, in this case an ewe, should be sacrificed to Jupiter.
          However we may come to better understand the sacrifice in the context
          of a confarreatio marriage ceremony. The appearance of the light of
          the Full Moon on mountaintops was thought among the Italic tribes to
          represent the hierogamos of the Sky Father and Mother Earth. These
          were "the First Gods" (principes dei), the Potent Deities of the
          Books of the Augurs (divi potes), Caelum and Terra. They were
          identified alternatively as Saturn and Ops; in Umbria as Fisius and
          Fisia or else as Cerfu and Cerfia:, among the Marrucini as Iove and
          Iovia, where in Rome Sabine Dioue Patir and Kerria Diouia became
          better known as Jupiter and Juno. (Varro, L. L. 5.57-66; Tavole
          Iguvium; Tabula Rapenensis). The special marriage ceremony called a
          confarreatio arrived at its climax when the bride and groom sat on
          two chairs covered by the hide of a single sacrificial ewe and shared
          bread and wine with one another. One of the requirements for being
          the flamen Dialis who performed the sacrifices of the Ides was that
          he be married by a rite of confarreatio, and it may well be because
          each month he and the flaminica Dialis reenacted the hierogamos of
          Jupiter and Juno as a confarreatio at the Capitolium.


          AUC 673 / 80 BCE: Death of Marius

          "On the very day of the beginning of his magistracy, Marius ordered
          that the senator Sextus Licinius was to be thrown from he [Tarpeian]
          rock. After many crimes, Marius died on the Ides of January. When we
          take everything into account, he had been a man about whom it was not
          easy to say whether he was more excellent in times of war than he was
          dangerous in times of peace." ~ Titus Livius, Perioche 80.9


          AUC 704 / 49 BCE: Caesar advances through Picenum and on towards Rome

          "Meantime, being informed that Thermus the pretor had entered
          Iguvium, with five cohorts, and was endeavouring to fortify the town;
          as he knew the inhabitants to be well inclined to his interest, he
          detached Curio thither, with three cohorts, drawn from Lisaurum and
          Rimini. Upon this, Thermus, who could not confide in the townsmen,
          retired with his cohorts, and quitted the place: but his troops
          abandoning him in their march, returned severally to their own homes.
          Curio was received into the place with great demonstrations of joy:
          which being reported to Caesar, as he found he had the good will of
          the colonies and free towns, he drew the cohorts of the thirteenth
          legion out of garrison, and marched to Auximum, which Attius held
          with a body of troops, and whence he had despatched senators to levy
          forces overall Picenum. Caesar's arrival being known, the chief
          citizens of Auximum went in a body to Attius Varus, and told him: "
          That it did not belong to them to determine on which side justice
          lay; but that neither they, nor the other municipal towns, could
          endure to see their gates shut against Caesar, who by his great
          actions had deserved so well of the commonwealth: that therefore he
          would do well to consult his own safety and reputation." Attius,
          moved by this speech, drew off his garrison and fled. But some of
          Caesar's first ranks pursuing him, obliged him to stop; and a battle
          ensuing, he was deserted by his men. Some of the troops returned
          home; the rest went over to Caesar, and brought along with them L.
          Pupius, first centurion of the legion, who had formerly held the same
          rank in Pompey's army. Caesar commended Attius's soldiers: dismissed
          Papius: returned thanks to the inhabitants of Auximum; and promised
          to retain always a grateful remembrance of their attachment.

          "These things being reported at Rome, the consternation was so great
          over the whole city, that when the consul Lentulus came to the
          treasury, to deliver out the money to Pompey, in consequence of the
          decree of the senate, he scarce waited the opening of the inner door,
          but precipitately left the place, upon a false rumour, that Caesar
          was approaching, and some of his cavalry already in view. He was soon
          followed by his colleague Marcellus, and the greater part of the
          magistrates, Pompey had left the town the day before, and was upon
          his way to Apulia, where he had quartered the legions he had received
          from Caesar. The levies were discontinued within the city, and no
          place appeared secure on this side of Capua. Here, at last, they took
          courage and rallied, and began to renew their levies in the colonies
          round about, which had been sent thither by the Julian law. Lentulus
          summoned into the forum the gladiators whom Caesar had ordered to be
          trained up there, gave them their liberty, furnished them with
          horses, and commanded them to follow him. But being afterwards
          admonished by his friends that this step was universally condemned,
          he dispersed them into the neighbouring town of Campania, to keep
          garrison there.

          "Caesar meanwhile leaving Auximum, traversed the whole country of
          Picenum; where he was joyfully received in all parts by the
          inhabitants, who furnished his army with every thing necessary. Even
          Cingulum itself, a town founded by Labienus, and built at his own
          expense, sent deputies to him, with an offer of their submission and
          services. He demanded a certain number of soldiers, which were sent
          immediately. Meantime the twelfth legion joined him; and with these
          two he marched to Asculum, a town of Picenum. Here Lentulus Spinther
          commanded with ten cohorts; who, hearing of Caesar's approach,
          quitted the place with his troops, who almost all deserted him upon
          the march. Being left with only a few, he fell in with Vibullius
          Rufus, whom Pompey had sent into Picenum to encourage his followers
          in those parts. Vibullius understanding from him the state of affairs
          in Picenum, dismissed Lentulus, and took the soldiers under his
          command. He likewise drew together from the neighbouring provinces as
          many as he could meet with of Pompey's levies: among the rest,
          Ulcilles Hirus, who was flying, with six cohorts, from Camerinum,
          where they had been quartered. Out of all these he formed thirteen
          cohorts, with which he posted, by great journeys, to Corfinium, where
          Domitius Ahenobarbus commanded; whom he informed that Caesar was
          approaching with two legions. Domitius had already got together, with
          great expedition, twenty cohorts from Alba, the country of the Marsi,
          Peligni,and the neighbouring provinces." ~ C. Julius Caesar,
          Commentary on the Civil War 1.11-13


          Our thought for today is from Marcus Aurelius, Meditations 11.18

          "If any have offended against thee, consider first: What is my
          relation to men, and that we are made for one another; and in another
          respect, I was made to be set over them, as a ram over the flock or a
          bull over the herd. But examine the matter from first principles,
          from this: If all things are not mere atoms, it is nature which
          orders all things: if this is so, the inferior things exist for the
          sake of the superior, and these for the sake of one another."
          Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60534 From: Nabarz Date: 2009-01-13
          Subject: Review: An Academic and Religious Journal of Greek, Roman and Persia
          Salve,

          There are new reviews of Mithras Reader Volumes I and II An Academic
          and Religious Journal of Greek, Roman and Persian Studies
          at:

          http://ritualmagick.co.uk/reviews/

          "....These readers represent the top end of the publications being
          produced today, exploring as they do the latest academic thought,
          artistic impressions and personal experiences, presented in three
          streams which each offer their own flavour and pleasures. In a field
          where rehashing third hand and lack of originality is all too common,
          these works are a refreshing change and well worth purchasing for
          your bookshelf, to be stored on the shelves for books that actually
          get read!"- reviewed by David Rankine for the Esoteric Book Review

          Regards,
          Nabarz.

          Full review:

          Mithras Reader Volumes I and II
          An Academic and Religious Journal of Greek, Roman and Persian Studies

          edited by Payam Nabarz

          published by Twin Serpents Press

          Vol I, PB, £24.95, 100pp

          Vol II, PB, £15.55, 104pp

          reviewed by David Rankine for the Esoteric Book Review

          As I received these two volumes together I decided to cover them both
          in the same review, though I shall consider the contents of each
          volume in turn to give them the attention they deserve. Both follow
          the same style, being divided into three sections, followed by
          reviews at the end. The sections are Academic Papers, Arts and
          Religious Articles, a template which works well to provide a wide
          range of material with something for most people.

          Volume I begins with Continuity and Change in the Cult of Mithra by
          Dr Israel Campos Mendez, a study of the links and contuinty between
          the Persian (Iranian) god Mithra and Mithras as worshipped by the
          Romans in their mysteries. Exploring in detail both the similarities
          and differences, Dr Mendez presents a step-by-step argument for
          continuity that avoids leaps of faith and relies on solid facts and
          logical deductions to present a substantial and enjoyable argument.
          The second paper is an Introduction to Classes of Manichean.
          Mithraism and Sufiyeh by Dr Saloome Rostampoor. This piece compares
          and contrasts the similarities and differences between the different
          religions, whilst providing background information on the religions,
          such as the appropriate commandments, and makes for a fascinating
          comparison.

          The essay Entheos ho syros, polymathes ho phoinix: Neoplatonist
          approaches to religious practice in Iamblichus and Porphyry by Sergio
          Knipe is for me the highlight of Volume I. This overview of the
          religious approaches of these two key magickal philosophers is
          fascinating and extremely lucid and enjoyable. Particular emphasis
          is given to Porphyry's On Abstinence from Killing Animals and On the
          Mysteries of Egypt by Iamblichus to illustrate their diverging
          approaches, whilst indicating their significance to future schools of
          thought. If you are unfamiliar with these two giants of the past,
          this article provides an ideal introduction to some of their most
          significant ideas.

          The final essay in this first section Mithraism and Alchemy by David
          Livingstone looks at the alchemical connections in the Mithraic
          ladder of initiation, drawing on the writings of figures such as
          Zosimus of Panopolis to explore the connections of these two diverse
          areas through the planetary symbolism inherent in both. The second
          section contains a number of pictures showing exhibits from the For
          example Mithras exhibition by Farangis Yegane, which explore the
          symbolism of the myths contained within Mithraism through her
          paintings and installations.

          Section 3 begins with an article by Guya Vichi on his relationship
          with Mithra, which resulted from a meditation, and includes an Ode.
          This is followed by a Hymn to the Sun by Katherine Sutherland and a
          piece by Payam Nabarz on the Mithras Liturgy with the Orphic Hymns.
          This latter piece is a practical rite of planetary magick, which
          combines the original source material with inspiration to fill in the
          gaps and ensure a flow which makes sense and provides a suitable
          catharsis for the dedicant.

          Volume II follows the same format, and Section 1 starts with the
          essay Factors determining the outside projection of the Mithraic
          Mysteries by Dr Israel Campos Mendes. This paper focuses on the
          social factors within the Mithraic mysteries, including their
          relevance within the Roman legion structure. By concentrating on the
          social dynamic we are reminded of the function of the mystery cult
          beyond the mystery, and this is a thought-provoking paper. The next
          essay is The Mithras Liturgy: cult liturgy, religious ritual, or
          magical theurgy? by Kim Huggens. By studying the evidence Kim
          Huggens argues convincingly and precisely that the ritual may well be
          a rite for use by magicians who had ascended through the seven grades.

          Section 2 includes more images from the For example Mithras
          exhibition by Farangis Yegane, as well as a striking Mithras-Phanes
          image by James Rodriguez, photographs of the Temple of Mithra in
          Garni (Armenia) by Jalil Nozariand a depiction of Mithras by Robert
          Kavjian. Section 3 contains a range of invocations and poetry to
          entrance and delight the reader. These include a Mithras Sol
          Invictus invocation by M. Hajduk, a translation of Sappho's Ode to
          Aphrodite by Harita Meenee, and the poems Norooz Phiroze by Farida
          Bamji, Disappearing Shrines and Moving Shrines by S. David, and The
          Sleeping Lord by Katherine Sutherland. This section reaches a climax
          with Payam Nabarz's article The right handed handshake of the Gods,
          emphasising the significance of this act through the ages, as well as
          Mithra's role as god of contracts and agreements.

          These readers represent the top end of the publications being
          produced today, exploring as they do the latest academic thought,
          artistic impressions and personal experiences, presented in three
          streams which each offer their own flavour and pleasures. In a field
          where rehashing third hand and lack of originality is all too common,
          these works are a refreshing change and well worth purchasing for
          your bookshelf, to be stored on the shelves for books that actually
          get read!

          http://ritualmagick.co.uk/reviews/
          ------------------------------------------------------------
          Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60535 From: Q. Caecilius Metellus Date: 2009-01-13
          Subject: Eidibus Ianuariis
          Q. Caecilius Metellus Quiritibus salutem.

          Saluete,

          The Ides of January, as with every month, were sacred to
          Juppiter, to whom a sheep was offered at the Temple of Juppiter
          Optimus Maximus on the Capitoline Hill by the Flamen Dialis. In
          the archaic calendar, this fell on the day of the full moon, and
          marked the middle of the lunar month. In a number of the Fasti
          found by archaeologists over the years, the day is marked
          "Feriae Iovi", and is a dies nefastus publicus.

          Not having a flamen Dialis, and it being yet very infeasible to
          sacrifice a sheep, I made today a libation to Juppiter, in
          remembrance of his previous offerings and in observation of this
          ritual.

          Today's weather, as predicted, was less than favourable for
          making the offering, being snowy, windy, and of course, bitterly
          cold. Despite that, however, I observed no ill omens or uitia
          which would invalidate the offering. May Jove continue to look
          favourably upon us!

          Di populum custodiant.

          Quintus Caecilius Metellus Postumianus
          Pontifex
          -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
          Send big files for free. Simple steps. No registration.
          Visit now http://www.nawelny.com
          Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60536 From: Bruno Cantermi Date: 2009-01-13
          Subject: Re: CURULE AEDILE EDICT 62-01: APPOINTMENT OF SCRIBAE
          Salve Caesar!
           
          Thanks for the appointment! when do I start working?
           
          Vale,
           
          LVSITANVS.SPD.
          ----- Original Message -----
          Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2009 1:18 AM
          Subject: [Nova-Roma] CURULE AEDILE EDICT 62-01: APPOINTMENT OF SCRIBAE

          Cn. Iulius Caesar aed. Quiritibus sal.

          CURULE AEDILE EDICT 62-01: APPOINTMENT OF SCRIBAE

          I hereby appoint the following scribes, to be divided between five
          work groups within the Cohors Aedilicia. No oath is required of them.
          Further appointments may follow.

          Marcus Aelius Severus
          Gaius Aemilius Crassus
          Publius Aemilius Lepidus
          Titus Annaeus Regulus
          Gnaeus Caelius Ahenobarbus
          Gaia Aurelia Falco Silvana
          Lucius Fidelius Lusitanus
          Gaius Flavius Ductoris
          Lucius Iulius Regulus
          Lucia Marcia Ralla
          Gaius Marcius Crispus
          Sextus Postumius Albus
          Decimus Scribonius Severus
          Quintus Servilius Priscus
          Gaius Terentius Varro
          Stephanus Ullerius Venator Piperbarbus



          __________ NOD32 3760 (20090112) Information __________

          This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system.
          http://www.eset.com
          Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60537 From: Tiberius Horatius Barbatus Date: 2009-01-13
          Subject: Updates to the "CURRENT EVENTS" on the Main NR Site
          Salvete Omnes,

          Recently there was an area to post upcoming Provincial events, but that seems to be gone for
          now. And the "Current Events" area is anything but. The "new" Sesterces isn't and the
          Conventus Novae Romae was last year's event.

          How frequently is this page updated? And can we add Provincial events?

          Gratias

          Optime valete

          Ti. Horatius Barbatus
          Legatus Pro Praetore Provincia Nova Britannia
          Tribunus Plebis, Nova Roma
          Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60538 From: Gnaeus Caelius Ahenobarbus Date: 2009-01-13
          Subject: Re: R: [Nova-Roma] Re: Possible name change...thoughts
          Ahenobarbus Scholasticae s.p.d.

              In hoc foro, Sanskritam scribere possumus? :-P
           
          --
          Gnaeus Caelius Ahenobarbus
          Lictor Curiatus et Accensus Consulis M. Curiatus Complutensis
          http://becomingnewthroughtheold.blogspot.com



          From: A. Tullia Scholastica <fororom@...>
          To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
          Sent: Monday, January 12, 2009 5:27:54 PM
          Subject: Re: R: [Nova-Roma] Re: Possible name change...thoughts

          Scholastica Poplicolae S.P.D.
           

          Eheu! Omnia non erunt priuata!

              ATS:  Not here, to be sure.  Nulla hoc in foro privata.  Si Sanskritice Siniceve scribamus, aliquis omnia legere possit.  In animo habui amicum ut viam mediam adhibeamus, non forum publicum!  

          Vale.  

          --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com <mailto:Nova- Roma%40yahoogrou ps.com> , "A. Tullia Scholastica"
          <fororom@...> wrote:
          >
          > >  Scholastica Lentulo suo S.P.D.
          > >  
          > >
          > > Lentulus Tulliae suae sal.
          > >
          > >
          > >>>>> >>>> "Marca Annia Megas Machinatrix is perect, a bit long, but
          never mind:
          > >>>>> Quintus Caecilius Metellus Pius Cornelianus Scipio Nasica
          Serapio would
          > >>>>> not mind it either. ;-)"
          > >
          > >     ATS:  I hope that all of these do not belong to one person,
          though I know
          > > the first four do...<<<
          > >
          > >
          > > But yes. He was known briefly as Metellus Scipio. A man from the
          family of the
          > > Cornelii Scipiones Nasicae Serapiones, that was a sub-branch of
          the Scipiones
          > > Nasicae ehich was again a sub-branch of the Scipio family. He was
          later
          > > adopted into the Metelli Pii, so hence the lots of cognomina. Some
          reserved
          > > their all previous cognomina after adoption,some none. Yes, there
          were such a
          > > long names.
          > >
          > >     ATS2:  The stonemasons must have appreciated the extra pay
          they got for
          > > carving such long names...
          > >
          > > PS.: I just received again notifications from your mailbox that
          you can't
          > > receive my private messages...
          > >
          > >     ATS2:  I did receive a message from a US student using the
          Yahoo mail
          > > (albeit after a bounce), but I guess you Europeans are beyond the
          pale.  We
          > > will have to use the intermediary I suggested, though I must
          confirm that.  Si
          > > Latine scribas, omnia privata sint.  Conor scholas nostras movere
          propterea
          > > quod servitor nondum operatur; per mensem non operatus est, nec
          nuntius nos
          > > quid agatur certiores fecit.  Nec discipuli nec praeceptores eis
          curae sunt;
          > > omnia pessum eunt.
          > >>   
          > >
          > >  Vale quam optime!
          > >  
          > >       
          > >    Messages in this topic
          > > <http://groups. yahoo.com/ group/Nova- Roma/message/ 60461
          >

           
                
             Messages in this topic           <http://groups. yahoo.com/ group/Nova- Roma/message/ 60461


          Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60539 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2009-01-13
          Subject: Re: Updates to the "CURRENT EVENTS" on the Main NR Site
          Salve Barbate,

          This is really a question for our webmaster(s), but we don't currently
          have any. The consuls are working to fix that problem. Once we have
          at least one webmaster the site will be brought up to date.

          Vale,

          CN-EQVIT-MARINVS

          Tiberius Horatius Barbatus <robbjaxon@...> writes:

          > Salvete Omnes,
          >
          > Recently there was an area to post upcoming Provincial events, but
          > that seems to be gone for
          > now. And the "Current Events" area is anything but. The "new"
          > Sesterces isn't and the
          > Conventus Novae Romae was last year's event.
          >
          > How frequently is this page updated? And can we add Provincial events?
          >
          > Gratias
          >
          > Optime valete
          >
          > Ti. Horatius Barbatus
          > Legatus Pro Praetore Provincia Nova Britannia
          > Tribunus Plebis, Nova Roma
          Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60540 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2009-01-13
          Subject: Re: R: [Nova-Roma] Re: Possible name change...thoughts
          Re: R: [Nova-Roma] Re: Possible name change...thoughts
          Scholastica Ahenobarbo quiritibus bonae voluntatis S.P.D.
           

          Ahenobarbus Scholasticae s.p.d.

              In hoc foro, Sanskritam scribere possumus? :-P

              ATS:  In computatore meo, fontem Devanagari aptum habeo, sed Yahoo tales mutat.  Et linguam Graecam torquet...

              I see your Latin studies are progressing.  Optime!
           
          --
          Gnaeus Caelius Ahenobarbus
          Lictor Curiatus et Accensus Consulis M. Curiatus Complutensis
          http://becomingnewthroughtheold.blogspot.com


          Vale, et valete.  


          From: A. Tullia Scholastica <fororom@...>
          To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
          Sent: Monday, January 12, 2009 5:27:54 PM
          Subject: Re: R: [Nova-Roma] Re: Possible name change...thoughts

           
           

          Scholastica Poplicolae S.P.D.
           

          Eheu! Omnia non erunt priuata!

              ATS:  Not here, to be sure.  Nulla hoc in foro privata.  Si Sanskritice Siniceve scribamus, aliquis omnia legere possit.  In animo habui amicum ut viam mediam adhibeamus, non forum publicum!  

          Vale.  

          --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com <http://ps.com>  <mailto:Nova- Roma%40yahoogrou ps.com> <mailto:Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com>  , "A. Tullia Scholastica"
          <fororom@...> wrote:
          >
          > >  Scholastica Lentulo suo S.P.D.
          > >  
          > >
          > > Lentulus Tulliae suae sal.
          > >
          > >
          > >>>>> >>>> "Marca Annia Megas Machinatrix is perect, a bit long, but
          never mind:
          > >>>>> Quintus Caecilius Metellus Pius Cornelianus Scipio Nasica
          Serapio would
          > >>>>> not mind it either. ;-)"
          > >
          > >     ATS:  I hope that all of these do not belong to one person,
          though I know
          > > the first four do...<<<
          > >
          > >
          > > But yes. He was known briefly as Metellus Scipio. A man from the
          family of the
          > > Cornelii Scipiones Nasicae Serapiones, that was a sub-branch of
          the Scipiones
          > > Nasicae ehich was again a sub-branch of the Scipio family. He was
          later
          > > adopted into the Metelli Pii, so hence the lots of cognomina. Some
          reserved
          > > their all previous cognomina after adoption,some none. Yes, there
          were such a
          > > long names.
          > >
          > >     ATS2:  The stonemasons must have appreciated the extra pay
          they got for
          > > carving such long names...
          > >
          > > PS.: I just received again notifications from your mailbox that
          you can't
          > > receive my private messages...
          > >
          > >     ATS2:  I did receive a message from a US student using the
          Yahoo mail
          > > (albeit after a bounce), but I guess you Europeans are beyond the
          pale.  We
          > > will have to use the intermediary I suggested, though I must
          confirm that.  Si
          > > Latine scribas, omnia privata sint.  Conor scholas nostras movere
          propterea
          > > quod servitor nondum operatur; per mensem non operatus est, nec
          nuntius nos
          > > quid agatur certiores fecit.  Nec discipuli nec praeceptores eis
          curae sunt;
          > > omnia pessum eunt.
          > >>   
          > >
          > >  Vale quam optime!
          > >  
          > >       
          > >    Messages in this topic
          > > <http://groups. yahoo.com/ group/Nova- Roma/message/ 60461 <http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma/message/60461>
          >

           
                
             Messages in this topic           <http://groups. yahoo.com/ group/Nova- Roma/message/ 60461 <http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma/message/60461>

           
            

           
           
                
             Messages in this topic           <http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma/message/60461
          Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60541 From: Marcus Arminius Maior Date: 2009-01-13
          Subject: Official NR Calendar
          Salvete

          I just want to announce that i received the official NR Calendar 2762,
          today (Idus Ianuarius according with the calendar; good omens,
          perhaps?). Very cool, with color pictures and all.
          Thanks to the Curii and Insula Umbra.

          Valete
          Marcus Arminius
          Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60542 From: Annia Minucia Marcella Date: 2009-01-13
          Subject: Re: Roman Calendar
          Salve,

          Anyone?
          Vale
          - Annia Minucia Marcella
          
          http://minucia.ciarin.com


          Annia Minucia Marcella wrote:

          Salvete Omnes!

          Is there a way to have our Roman Calendar for this year to be put in
          .ics format? It would definitely help me out a lot because manually
          inputting all the days would be quite time-consuming and tedious.

          --
          Valete
          - Annia Minucia Marcella

          http://minucia. ciarin.com

          Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60543 From: Q. Caecilius Metellus Date: 2009-01-13
          Subject: Re: Roman Calendar
          Q Caecilius Metellus Anniae Minuciae Marcellae salutem.

          Short of entering each day in manually, I can't say that *I* have any other way.
          I'll see if anything I can find makes life easier.
          Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60544 From: Charlie Collins Date: 2009-01-13
          Subject: Re: Roman Calendar
          Salve,

          If anyone has a Mac they could probably use iCal to due a calendar. I
          have a Mac but have not used iCal to seriously attempt to do a Roman
          calendar(I did try years ago but gave up). If theres a iCal expert out
          there, please try to make one.

          Vale,
          Quintus Servilius Priscus


          On 1/13/09, Q. Caecilius Metellus <postumianus@...> wrote:
          > Q Caecilius Metellus Anniae Minuciae Marcellae salutem.
          >
          > Short of entering each day in manually, I can't say that *I* have any other way.
          > I'll see if anything I can find makes life easier.
          >
          > ------------------------------------
          >
          > Yahoo! Groups Links
          >
          >
          >
          >
          Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60545 From: Charlie Collins Date: 2009-01-13
          Subject: Rome by Segway
          Salve,

          Here's a tour company in Rome that uses Segway's for their tour's in
          Rome. I'm not sure I would want to use a Segway in Italian traffic
          though :-) Here is the link to the company site. It's called iGlide
          Tours.

          http://www.iglidetours.com/rome/tours.asp

          Vale,
          Quintus Servilius Priscus
          Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60546 From: Annia Minucia Marcella Date: 2009-01-13
          Subject: Re: Roman Calendar
          Salve,

          Someone did one last year and it was so nice.
          Vale
          - Annia Minucia Marcella
          
          http://minucia.ciarin.com


          Charlie Collins wrote:

          Salve,

          If anyone has a Mac they could probably use iCal to due a calendar. I
          have a Mac but have not used iCal to seriously attempt to do a Roman
          calendar(I did try years ago but gave up). If theres a iCal expert out
          there, please try to make one.

          Vale,
          Quintus Servilius Priscus

          On 1/13/09, Q. Caecilius Metellus <postumianus@ gmx.net> wrote:
          > Q Caecilius Metellus Anniae Minuciae Marcellae salutem.
          >
          > Short of entering each day in manually, I can't say that *I* have any other way.
          > I'll see if anything I can find makes life easier.
          >
          > ------------ --------- --------- ------
          >
          > Yahoo! Groups Links
          >
          >
          >
          >

          Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60547 From: Tiberius Horatius Barbatus Date: 2009-01-14
          Subject: MithraCon
          Barbatus Omnibus sal.

          Citizens of Nova Roma, I am please to announce MithraCon XII!

          MithraCon - The New England Conference on Mithraic Studies, now entering its 12th year,
          is an informal research convention for people interested in the study of the god Mithras,
          whose popularity reached its height among the Roman legions in about 100 to 400 CE.

          Mithraism touches on many aspects of ancient history — early Christianity, mystery
          religions, philosophy, astrology, symbolism, the Roman provincial system, Zoroastrianism,
          and more. People attending MithraCon bring their individual research interests and ideas,
          and get a chance to try those ideas out on others and discover new ways of looking at
          ancient history.

          MithraCon is held at Yale University, and convention highlights include the chance to do
          research in Yale's world-class libraries

          This is a great opportunity, not only to get a crash course, on Mithras, but support one of
          our own - Sibylla Ambrosia Fulvia - who runs this event.

          I encourage everyone that can to attend. For more information, go to the website:

          http://www.mithracon.org/index.html

          Optime valete

          Ti Horatius Barbatus
          Legatus Pro Praetore Provincia Nova Britannia
          Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60548 From: Q. Valerius Poplicola Date: 2009-01-14
          Subject: Ancient Roman Theme Park
          "The number of visitors to papal audiences has also dropped. Mr
          Alemanno's administration has announced plans for a Disney-style
          ancient Rome theme park to boost tourist numbers in Rome in future. "

          http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/comment/faith/article5517909.ece
          Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60549 From: L Julia Aquila Date: 2009-01-14
          Subject: Re: Ancient Roman Theme Park
          Salvé Paplicola!

          Here is another link that explains a little more detail:
          http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/italy/2562473/Italy-
          plans-Disneyland-style-theme-park-depicting-Ancient-Rome.html

          While I registered my opinion in Coloniae-Romanae that I would not
          want to see anything along these lines in the NR land project, this
          looks like it would be an enjoyable park to visit. Mr Cutrufo,
          Rome's deputy mayor is looking for private investment in the theme
          park as the cost is going to astronomical!

          Grátiás, very interesting!

          Valé

          Julia Aquila

          --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Q. Valerius Poplicola"
          <catullus.poeta@...> wrote:
          >
          > "The number of visitors to papal audiences has also dropped. Mr
          > Alemanno's administration has announced plans for a Disney-style
          > ancient Rome theme park to boost tourist numbers in Rome in
          future. "
          >
          > http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/comment/faith/article5517909.ece
          >
          Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60550 From: Maior Date: 2009-01-14
          Subject: Carmentalia is tomorrow
          M. Hortensia Maior Quiritibus spd;
          tomorrow is the Carmentalia, and I and Q. Caelia Laeta a new civis
          will be celebrating the Carmentalia. I hope to have photos and will
          post them over at the Nova Roma wiki.
          May Carmentis watch over all expectant Nova Romans and see many
          healthy new citizens:)
          bene valete in pacem Carmentis
          M. Hortensia Maior
          Flaminica Carmentalis
          Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60551 From: M. Lucretius Agricola Date: 2009-01-15
          Subject: Re: Updates to the "CURRENT EVENTS" on the Main NR Site
          http://www.novaroma.org/nr/Events

          --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Tiberius Horatius Barbatus"
          <robbjaxon@...> wrote:
          >
          > Salvete Omnes,
          >
          > Recently there was an area to post upcoming Provincial events, but
          that seems to be gone for
          > now. And the "Current Events" area is anything but. The "new"
          Sesterces isn't and the
          > Conventus Novae Romae was last year's event.
          >
          > How frequently is this page updated? And can we add Provincial events?
          >
          > Gratias
          >
          > Optime valete
          >
          > Ti. Horatius Barbatus
          > Legatus Pro Praetore Provincia Nova Britannia
          > Tribunus Plebis, Nova Roma
          >
          Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60552 From: Tiberius Horatius Barbatus Date: 2009-01-15
          Subject: Re: Updates to the "CURRENT EVENTS" on the Main NR Site
          Salvete,

          Yes, the Current Events area, which needs to be updated. So can any citizen post local
          events in this same area, when there use to be a "local events" section of the page?

          Valete

          Barbatus
          --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "M. Lucretius Agricola" <marcus.lucretius@...>
          wrote:
          >
          > http://www.novaroma.org/nr/Events
          >
          > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Tiberius Horatius Barbatus"
          > <robbjaxon@> wrote:
          > >
          > > Salvete Omnes,
          > >
          > > Recently there was an area to post upcoming Provincial events, but
          > that seems to be gone for
          > > now. And the "Current Events" area is anything but. The "new"
          > Sesterces isn't and the
          > > Conventus Novae Romae was last year's event.
          > >
          > > How frequently is this page updated? And can we add Provincial events?
          > >
          > > Gratias
          > >
          > > Optime valete
          > >
          > > Ti. Horatius Barbatus
          > > Legatus Pro Praetore Provincia Nova Britannia
          > > Tribunus Plebis, Nova Roma
          > >
          >
          Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60553 From: M•IVL•SEVERVS Date: 2009-01-15
          Subject: PLVRIMAS GRATIAS, NOVI ROMANI!

          M. Iulius Severus Consul: M. Curiatio Complutensi Consuli collegae Quiritibus, et omnibus: salutem plurimam dicunt:

          The final reports for 2761 a.U.c (AD 2008) have been completed.  Citizens expressed their support in many ways during the year.  Whether it was by volunteering time and skills, participating in lively debates, paying taxes, or individual donations, your contributions have made the past year a great success.

          We would especially like to recognize the extraordinary generosity of the following individuals who donated directly to Nova Roma and its projects:

          Donations to the Land Fund

          -  Stephanus Ullerius Venator Piperbarbus

          Donations to the Magna Mater Project

          -  Annia Minucia Marcella -  Tiberius Antonius Romulus -  Marcus Martianius Lupus -  Equestria Iunia Laeca -  Gaius Marcius Crispus -  Christopher Volpe

          Donations to Nova Roma

          -  Gaius Iulius Verus -  Tiberius Galerius Paulinus -  Gaius Aemilius Crassus -  Marcus Apuleius Maritimus -  Equestria Iunia Laeca -  Quintus Iunius Dominicus -  Tiberius Decius Marcellus -  Crispus Julius Pompeius -  Marcus Iulius Cicero -  Gaius Sertorius Baeticus -  Lucius Sentius Saturninus

          Donations In-Kind

          -  Tiberius Galerius Paulinus -  Marcus Minucius Audens

          Thank you to everyone involved in making 2761 a.U.c. a wonderful year!

          Valete optime,

           

          M•IVL•SEVERVS
          CONSVL•NOVÆ•ROMÆ

          SENATOR
          CONSVL•PROVINCIÆ•MEXICO


          Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60554 From: Cocceius Spinula Date: 2009-01-15
          Subject: PLVRIMAS GRATIAS, NOVI ROMANI! | Português/ Portuguese

          M•IVL•SEVERVS wrote:

          M. Iulius Severus Consul: M. Curiatio Complutensi Consuli collegae Quiritibus, et omnibus: salutem plurimam dicunt:

          Os relatórios finais para 2761 a.U.c (AD 2008) foram concluídos.  Os cidadãos manifestaram o seu apoio de diversas formas ao longos do ano. Quer tenha sido por tempo voluntário e habilidade, por participação nos debates, por pagar os impostos, ou pelas doações individuais, as vossas contribuições fizeram do ano passado um grande sucesso.

          Nós gostariamos de especialmente reconhecer a extraordinária generosidade dos seguintes indivíduos que doaram directamente à Nova Roma e aos seus projectos:

          Doações para o Fundo do Terreno

          -  Stephanus Ullerius Venator Piperbarbus

          Doações para o projecto Magna Mater

          -  Annia Minucia Marcella -  Tiberius Antonius Romulus -  Marcus Martianius Lupus -  Equestria Iunia Laeca -  Gaius Marcius Crispus -  Christopher Volpe

          Doações para a Nova Roma

          -  Gaius Iulius Verus -  Tiberius Galerius Paulinus -  Gaius Aemilius Crassus -  Marcus Apuleius Maritimus -  Equestria Iunia Laeca -  Quintus Iunius Dominicus -  Tiberius Decius Marcellus -  Crispus Julius Pompeius -  Marcus Iulius Cicero -  Gaius Sertorius Baeticus -  Lucius Sentius Saturninus

          Doações em espécie

          -  Tiberius Galerius Paulinus -  Marcus Minucius Audens

          Obrigado a todos os interessados em tornar 2761 a.U.c. um ano maravilhoso!

          Valete optime,

           

          M•IVL•SEVERVS
          CONSVL•NOVƕROMÆ

          SENATOR
          CONSVL•PROVINCIƕMEXICO



          Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60555 From: M•IVL•SEVERVS Date: 2009-01-15
          Subject: PLVRIMAS GRATIAS, NOVI ROMANI!

          M. Iulius Severus Consul: M. Curiatio Complutensi Consuli collegae Quiritibus, et omnibus: salutem plurimam dicunt:

          Los informes finales para el año MMDCCLXI a.V.c. (2008 de n.e.) están completes. Los ciudadanos manifestaron su apoyo de diferente manera durante este año. Bien sea mediante una aportación voluntaria de tiempo y capacidades, su participación en animados debates, el pago de impuestos o los donativos individuales, sus contribuciones han permitido que el año pasado haya sido sumamente exitoso.

          Deseamos hacer público un reconocimiento especial a la extraordinaria generosidad de las siguientes personas, que aportaron donativos directos a Nova Roma y sus proyectos:

          Donativos al Fondo Territorial

          -  Stephanus Ullerius Venator Piperbarbus

          Donativos al Proyecto Magna Mater

          -  Annia Minucia Marcella -  Tiberius Antonius Romulus -  Marcus Martianius Lupus -  Equestria Iunia Laeca -  Gaius Marcius Crispus -  Christopher Volpe

          Donativos a Nova Roma

          -  Gaius Iulius Verus -  Tiberius Galerius Paulinus -  Gaius Aemilius Crassus -  Marcus Apuleius Maritimus -  Equestria Iunia Laeca -  Quintus Iunius Dominicus -  Tiberius Decius Marcellus -  Crispus Julius Pompeius -  Marcus Iulius Cicero -  Gaius Sertorius Baeticus -  Lucius Sentius Saturninus

          Donativos en especie

          -  Tiberius Galerius Paulinus -  Marcus Minucius Audens

          ¡Muchas gracias a todos los que contribuyeron para que MMDCCLXI fuese un año magnífico!

          Valete optime,

           

          M•IVL•SEVERVS
          CONSVL•NOVÆ•ROMÆ

          SENATOR
          CONSVL•PROVINCIÆ•MEXICO


          Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60556 From: Lucia Livia Plauta Date: 2009-01-15
          Subject: Re: Ancient Roman Theme Park
          Salvete omnes,
          actually Italians are a bit skeptical about this project.
          The first objection opposed is why don't they try to promote more
          some real archaeological sites, like Ostia antica, which are not
          completely visitable?

          The second is that the proposed area is one of the few left nature
          preserves, with a very nice pine forest, and on the way to Ostia,
          which already have huge traffic problems due to the undersizing of
          roads.

          Optime valete,
          Livia

          --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "L Julia Aquila" <dis_pensible@...>
          wrote:
          >
          > Salvé Paplicola!
          >
          > Here is another link that explains a little more detail:
          > http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/italy/2562473/
          Italy-
          > plans-Disneyland-style-theme-park-depicting-Ancient-Rome.html
          >
          > While I registered my opinion in Coloniae-Romanae that I would not
          > want to see anything along these lines in the NR land project, this
          > looks like it would be an enjoyable park to visit. Mr Cutrufo,
          > Rome's deputy mayor is looking for private investment in the theme
          > park as the cost is going to astronomical!
          >
          > Grátiás, very interesting!
          >
          > Valé
          >
          > Julia Aquila
          >
          > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Q. Valerius Poplicola"
          > <catullus.poeta@> wrote:
          > >
          > > "The number of visitors to papal audiences has also dropped. Mr
          > > Alemanno's administration has announced plans for a Disney-style
          > > ancient Rome theme park to boost tourist numbers in Rome in
          > future. "
          > >
          > > http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/comment/faith/article5517909.ece
          > >
          >
          Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60557 From: M•IVL•SEVERVS Date: 2009-01-15
          Subject: PLVRIMAS GRATIAS, NOVI ROMANI!

          M. Iulius Severus Consul: M. Curiatio Complutensi Consuli collegae Quiritibus, et omnibus: salutem plurimam dicunt:

          Sono stati completati i rapporti finali per l'anno 2761 a.U.c (AD 2008). I cittadini hanno espresso il loro appoggio in molti modi durante l'anno. I vostri contributi, consistiti nel mettere a disposizione tempo e competenze, partecipare a accesi dibattiti, pagare le tasse, o in donazioni individuali, hanno reso l'anno passato un grande successo. Vorremmo ringraziare specialmente la straordinaria generosità dei seguenti individui, che hanno donato direttamente a Nova Roma e ai suoi progetti:

          Donazioni al fondo per l'aquisto di un terreno:

          - Stephanus Ullerius Venator Piperbarbus

          Donazioni per il progetto Magna Mater:

          - Annia Minucia Marcella - Tiberius Antonius Romulus – Marcus Martianius Lupus - Equestria Iunia Laeca - Gaius Marcius Crispus - Christopher Volpe

          Donazioni a Nova Roma

          - Gaius Iulius Verus - Tiberius Galerius Paulinus - Gaius Aemilius Crassus - Marcus Apuleius Maritimus - Equestria Iunia Laeca – Quintus Iunius Dominicus - Tiberius Decius Marcellus - Crispus Julius Pompeius - Marcus Iulius Cicero - Gaius Sertorius Baeticus – Lucius Sentius Saturninus

          Donazioni in natura

          - Tiberius Galerius Paulinus - Marcus Minucius Audens

          Grazie a tutti quelli che hanno contribuito a rendere il 2761 a.U.c.un anno meraviglioso!

          Valete optime,

          M•IVL•SEVERVS

          CONSVL•NOVÆ•ROMÆ

          SENATOR

          CONSVL•PROVINCIÆ•MEXICO


          Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60558 From: Maior Date: 2009-01-15
          Subject: Carmentalia
          M. Hortensia Quiritibus spd;
          today the 2nd celebration of the Carmentalia, Q. Caelia Laeta and I
          performed the ceremony. It was freezing, Caelia played the harp and I
          made the appropriate sacrifices to Carmentis, neither of us heard or
          observed any bad signs, in fact Caelia's harp was plucked by the wind
          and made rippling music, and she noticed how pervasive the incense was.
          We attempted a video, which is just a moment with no sound, but
          next feria we'll have both:)I prayed for the matrons of Nova Roma and
          their offspring, may the gods favour us!
          http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8biUbmu91gk
          di deasque vos ament
          M. Hortensia Maior
          Flaminica Carmentalis
          Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60559 From: iulius sabinus Date: 2009-01-15
          Subject: Re: Carmentalia
          SALVE FLAMINICA CARMENTALIS!
           
          Thank you very much for this post and for your fine dedication.
           
          VALE BENE,
          IVL SABINVS

          "Every individual is the architect of his own fortune" - Appius Claudius


          --- On Fri, 1/16/09, Maior <rory12001@...> wrote:

          From: Maior <rory12001@...>
          Subject: [Nova-Roma] Carmentalia
          To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
          Date: Friday, January 16, 2009, 4:18 AM

          M. Hortensia Quiritibus spd;
          today the 2nd celebration of the Carmentalia, Q. Caelia Laeta and I
          performed the ceremony. It was freezing, Caelia played the harp and I
          made the appropriate sacrifices to Carmentis, neither of us heard or
          observed any bad signs, in fact Caelia's harp was plucked by the wind
          and made rippling music, and she noticed how pervasive the incense was.
          We attempted a video, which is just a moment with no sound, but
          next feria we'll have both:)I prayed for the matrons of Nova Roma and
          their offspring, may the gods favour us!
          http://www.youtube. com/watch? v=8biUbmu91gk
          di deasque vos ament
          M. Hortensia Maior
          Flaminica Carmentalis


          Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60560 From: titus.aquila Date: 2009-01-16
          Subject: PLVRIMAS GRATIAS, NOVI ROMANI!
          M. Iulius Severus Consul: M. Curiatio Complutensi Consuli collegae
          Quiritibus, et omnibus: salutem plurimam dicunt:

          Die endgültigen Berichte für 2761 a.U.c. (AD2008) sind
          fertiggestellt. Buerger haben ihre Unterstuetzung in vielen
          verschiedenen Wegen durch das Jahr ausgedrueckt.

          Sowohl durch Bereitstellung von Zeit und Faehigkeiten, durch ihre
          Teilnahme an lebhaften Debatten, durch die Bezahlung von Steuern,
          oder durch individuelle Spenden.

          Eurere Beitraege Buerger, haben das letzte Jahr zu einem sehr
          erfolgreichen Jahr gemacht.

          Wir anerkennen besonders die aussergewoehnliche Grosszuegigkeit der
          folgenden Personen, welche direkt Nova Roma oder den Projekten
          gespendet haben:

          Spenden fuer den Land Fonds:
          - Stephanus Ullerius Venator Piperbarbus

          Spenden fuer das Magna Mater Projekt
          - Annia Minucia Marcella - Tiberius Antonius Romulus - Marcus
          Martianius Lupus - Equestria Iunia Laeca - Gaius Marcius Crispus -
          Christopher Volpe

          Spenden fuer Nova Roma
          - Gaius Iulius Verus - Tiberius Galerius Paulinus - Gaius
          Aemilius Crassus - Marcus Apuleius Maritimus - Equestria Iunia
          Laeca - Quintus Iunius Dominicus - Tiberius Decius Marcellus -
          Crispus Julius Pompeius - Marcus Iulius Cicero - Gaius Sertorius
          Baeticus - Lucius Sentius Saturninus

          Spenden in Sachleistungen:
          - Tiberius Galerius Paulinus - Marcus Minucius Audens

          Ein Dankeschoen an alle die 2761 a.U.c.. zu einem wunderbaren Jahr
          gemacht haben !

          Valete optime,

          M•IVL•SEVERVS
          CONSVL•NOVƕROMÆ
          SENATOR
          CONSVL•PROVINCIƕMEXICO
          Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60561 From: Gnaeus Caelius Ahenobarbus Date: 2009-01-16
          Subject: Another Nova Roma?
          Cn. Caelius Ahenobarbus omnibus s.p.d.

          This is interesting:

          http://novaroma.weebly.com/index.html

          --
          Gnaeus Caelius Ahenobarbus
          Lictor Curiatus et Accensus Consulibus
          http://becomingnewthroughtheold.blogspot.com
          Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60562 From: Cn. Cornelius Lentulus Date: 2009-01-16
          Subject: R: [Nova-Roma] Another Nova Roma?
          Lentulus Caelio sal.

          Yes, yeasterday I also found them! An interesting and nice RPG, that combines the Marxist movements, the socialism, Roman history, tsarian Russia, Roman empire and republic. Interesting  (and a bit pathetic...). That other Nova Roma is founded by one of our underage applicant, Raul Ausa, L. Martianius Corvus.

          Presumably he found Nova Roma on the internet, became enthusiastic and wants an "own" Nova Roma.

          I see however a copyright problem at the bottom of this page:

          http://novaroma.weebly.com/gallery.html

          The NR flag is used there without the permission of NR Inc...




          --- Ven 16/1/09, Gnaeus Caelius Ahenobarbus <cn.caelius@...> ha scritto:


          Cn. Caelius Ahenobarbus omnibus s.p.d.

          This is interesting:

          http://novaroma. weebly.com/ index.html

          --
          Gnaeus Caelius Ahenobarbus
          Lictor Curiatus et Accensus Consulibus
          http://becomingnewt hroughtheold. blogspot. com


          Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60563 From: philippe cardon Date: 2009-01-16
          Subject: Re: Another Nova Roma?
          the last self proclamed emperor i know was Bokasa in centre-Afrique
          that is a good company
           
          Varro
          ----- Original Message -----
          Sent: Friday, January 16, 2009 11:20 PM
          Subject: [Nova-Roma] Another Nova Roma?

          Cn. Caelius Ahenobarbus omnibus s.p.d.

          This is interesting:

          http://novaroma. weebly.com/ index.html

          --
          Gnaeus Caelius Ahenobarbus
          Lictor Curiatus et Accensus Consulibus
          http://becomingnewt hroughtheold. blogspot. com


          ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
          Orange vous informe que cet e-mail a été contrôlé par l'anti-virus mail.
          Aucun virus connu à ce jour par nos services n'a été détecté.


          Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60564 From: Cocceius Spinula Date: 2009-01-16
          Subject: Another Nova Roma?
          Salvete omnes,

          When I research, for the first time, Roma Nova (Iike Cartago Nova) I found at least three Nova Roma's.
          (In 2005)

          I think this was one...
          I think it looks the same as three years ago...

          Valete,
          C. Cocceius Spinula
          Provincia Hispania, Lusitania
          Accensus Consulum et Procurator Regionis Lusitaniae

          Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60565 From: Amelie Zapf Date: 2009-01-16
          Subject: Introductory posting
          Amelia omnibus s.p.d.,

          (from the postings I got so far, it seems like it's the custom here to write
          the address in Latin, but the posting in English. So I'll stick to that.)

          Well, this is my first posting on this list. I've surfed past the Nova Roma
          web site quite often, and finally had the time and initiative to join. Just
          to introduce myself very quickly, I'm a musician (piano/vocal/guitar/bass)
          from Berlin, Germany, who studied something else entirely (physical
          chemistry), and who's got a penchant for everything to do with classical
          antiquity.

          Well, I hope you don't mind me looking around here a bit, maybe jumping into
          one conversation or the other, and generally getting a feel of the place.

          As an avid Catullus lover, I'll use the nomen Valeria on this list, and Scaeva
          is what I am, so here goes: P. Valeria Scaeva. So all follow-up postings will
          have this name in the header. (Of course, I'd love to keep my real-world
          praenomen Amelia, but it's not historical :-( )

          Valete omnes quam optime,

          P. Valeria Scaeva
          Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60566 From: L Julia Aquila Date: 2009-01-16
          Subject: Re: Introductory posting
          Salve Amelia,

          Welcome to Nova Roma!
          Most posts are in English because there are a lot of members who do
          not speak Latin or not well enough to read and write it with any
          proficiency. However feel free to supplement your English post with a
          Latin translation, the Latinists might enjoy it and it gives me some
          practice;)

          Vale
          Julia Aquila

          --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Amelie Zapf <amy@...> wrote:
          >
          > Amelia omnibus s.p.d.,
          >
          > (from the postings I got so far, it seems like it's the custom here
          to write
          > the address in Latin, but the posting in English. So I'll stick to
          that.)
          >
          > Well, this is my first posting on this list. I've surfed past the
          Nova Roma
          > web site quite often, and finally had the time and initiative to
          join. Just
          > to introduce myself very quickly, I'm a musician
          (piano/vocal/guitar/bass)
          > from Berlin, Germany, who studied something else entirely (physical
          > chemistry), and who's got a penchant for everything to do with
          classical
          > antiquity.
          >
          > Well, I hope you don't mind me looking around here a bit, maybe
          jumping into
          > one conversation or the other, and generally getting a feel of the
          place.
          >
          > As an avid Catullus lover, I'll use the nomen Valeria on this list,
          and Scaeva
          > is what I am, so here goes: P. Valeria Scaeva. So all follow-up
          postings will
          > have this name in the header. (Of course, I'd love to keep my real-
          world
          > praenomen Amelia, but it's not historical :-( )
          >
          > Valete omnes quam optime,
          >
          > P. Valeria Scaeva
          >
          Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60567 From: L Julia Aquila Date: 2009-01-16
          Subject: Re: Another Nova Roma?
          Salve,

          Of course there is the Hotel, with dot com instead of dot org;) I think
          it is in Spain..

          Vale

          Julia Aquila
          Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60568 From: Gnaeus Caelius Ahenobarbus Date: 2009-01-16
          Subject: Re: R: [Nova-Roma] Another Nova Roma?
          Caelius Lentulo omnibusque s.p.d.

              Not only is there an image copyright issue, but doesn't "Nova Roma, Inc." own the "Nova Roma" service mark? That must be pursued or else we look as if we don't care about it. They must not be able to use that name.
           
          --
          Gnaeus Caelius Ahenobarbus
          Lictor Curiatus et Accensus Consulibus
          http://becomingnewthroughtheold.blogspot.com



          Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60569 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2009-01-16
          Subject: Re: Introductory posting
          Re: [Nova-Roma] Introductory posting
          A. Tullia Scholastica P. Valeriae Scaevae quiritibus, sociis, peregrinisque bonae voluntatis S.P.D.  
           

          Amelia omnibus s.p.d.,

          (from the postings I got so far, it seems like it's the custom here to write
          the address in Latin, but the posting in English. So I'll stick to that.)

              ATS:  Yes, but all languages which can be read by any of the scribae, praetorian quaestores, or praetores are acceptable.  Yahoo does things to those not written in the Latin alphabet, however, or we could do Greek, or maybe even Sanskrit here.  If you can write in Latin, feel free to do so here.  Other lists are less welcoming, but there is one specifically for Latin, and another where Latin and other languages are welcome even when untranslated.  We have sodalitates, or SIGs, where one can find Latin, the arts, and many other things (cooking, the military, Greek, etc.).  

          Well, this is my first posting on this list. I've surfed past the Nova Roma
          web site quite often, and finally had the time and initiative to join. Just
          to introduce myself very quickly, I'm a musician (piano/vocal/guitar/bass)
          from Berlin, Germany, who studied something else entirely (physical
          chemistry), and who's got a penchant for everything to do with classical
          antiquity.

              ATS:  Sounds like a good mix to me.  One of us is a professional astronomer (Marinus), who also sings and plays guitar, and a couple of my Latin students are in the hard sciences as well.  We have poets and musicians, lawyers and law enforcement officers, and about anything you could name in Nova Roma.  

          Well, I hope you don't mind me looking around here a bit, maybe jumping into
          one conversation or the other, and generally getting a feel of the place.

              ATS:  We certainly don’t.  Welcome to Nova Roma!  Willkommen!  (T. Flavius Aquila will tell me if I spelled that wrong...it’s been a long time since I took German).  

          As an avid Catullus lover, I'll use the nomen Valeria on this list,

              ATS:  Have you applied for citizenship?  


          and Scaeva
          is what I am, so here goes: P. Valeria Scaeva. So all follow-up postings will
          have this name in the header. (Of course, I'd love to keep my real-world
          praenomen Amelia, but it's not historical :-( )

              ATS:  Valeria is a lovely name, one I used to have in NR...but Latinists who moreover are censorial scribae should set a good example and have proper Roman names, not those with three nomina, as my original one did.  That was allowed back when I joined, but is no longer permitted.  If you applied for citizenship and had wanted Aemilia as a nomen or possibly as a cognomen, however, it should have been allowed.  As for scaeva, there are several of us around, and at least one Scaevola; like most members of one of my grad school Greek courses, I am also scaeva.  

          Valete omnes quam optime,



          P. Valeria Scaeva

          Vale et valete quam optime.  
           
                
             Messages in this topic           <http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma/message/60565


          Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60570 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2009-01-16
          Subject: Re: Introductory posting
          Salve Scaeva!

          Welcome to Nova Roma!

          P. Valeria Scaeva <amy@...> writes:

          > I'm a musician (piano/vocal/guitar/bass)

          That's quite a good range of ability right there.

          > from Berlin, Germany, who studied something else entirely (physical
          > chemistry),

          *nod* A very challenging field. Do you work as a physical chemist?

          > As an avid Catullus lover, I'll use the nomen Valeria on this list,
          > and Scaeva
          > is what I am, so here goes: P. Valeria Scaeva. So all follow-up postings will
          > have this name in the header. (Of course, I'd love to keep my real-world
          > praenomen Amelia, but it's not historical :-( )

          Have you applied for Nova Roman citizenship? I ask because you could
          also consider the name P. Aemilia Scaeva. That would preserve
          something very close to your given name in your Nova Roman name.

          In any case, welcome again.

          Vale,

          CN-EQVIT-MARINVS
          Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60571 From: Cn. Cornelius Lentulus Date: 2009-01-17
          Subject: Re: Introductory posting
          Cn. Lentulus Valeriae Scaevae sal.


          Welcome to Nova Roma!

          As our Cn. Marinus writes:


          >>> Have you applied for Nova Roman citizenship? I ask because you could
          also consider the name P. Aemilia Scaeva. That would preserve
          something very close to your given name in your Nova Roman name. <<<


          Indeed, you can think about your name as long as you in the probationary status. You can choose the gens Aemilia, but there is also a possibility to have your given name as a cognomen, so you can be P. Valeria Amelia, too!



          --- Sab 17/1/09, Gnaeus Equitius Marinus <gawne@...> ha scritto:

          Salve Scaeva!

          Welcome to Nova Roma!

          P. Valeria Scaeva <amy@ameliezapf. com> writes:

          > I'm a musician (piano/vocal/ guitar/bass)

          That's quite a good range of ability right there.

          > from Berlin, Germany, who studied something else entirely (physical
          > chemistry),

          *nod* A very challenging field. Do you work as a physical chemist?

          > As an avid Catullus lover, I'll use the nomen Valeria on this list,
          > and Scaeva
          > is what I am, so here goes: P. Valeria Scaeva. So all follow-up postings will
          > have this name in the header. (Of course, I'd love to keep my real-world
          > praenomen Amelia, but it's not historical :-( )

          Have you applied for Nova Roman citizenship? I ask because you could
          also consider the name P. Aemilia Scaeva. That would preserve
          something very close to your given name in your Nova Roman name.

          In any case, welcome again.

          Vale,

          CN-EQVIT-MARINVS


          Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60572 From: Amelie Zapf Date: 2009-01-17
          Subject: Re: Introductory posting
          P. Aemilia Scaeva Cn. Equitio Marino, A. Tulliae Scholasticae, Cn. Cornelio
          Lentulo omnibus sodalibusque s.p.d.

          Thank you all for the warm welcome. I hope I can answer all of your questions
          in a halfway legible manner.

          > > I'm a musician (piano/vocal/guitar/bass)
          > That's quite a good range of ability right there.

          Somehow learning instruments becomes easier as you go. If you know one in
          reasonable depth, it is comparatively easy to add another, because the
          underlying concepts remain the same, it's just the handling that has to be
          relearnt.

          > *nod* A very challenging field. Do you work as a physical chemist?

          Yes and no. On December 2, I defended my PhD thesis that I wrote "on the
          side". For three years now, I have lived exclusively off of being a
          self-employed musician. So I'm still sort-of "in the field" (which, in my
          case, was lyotropic liquid crystals, if that rings a bell for you), but
          actually, I love my artistic lifestyle. Maybe I'll take on some postdoctoral
          position at university again, but I'd love to have a little change of focus,
          so I'd rather do that in a different field -- I've set my sight on two
          institutes I'd love to join, let's see what develops.

          > Have you applied for Nova Roman citizenship? I ask because you could
          > also consider the name P. Aemilia Scaeva. That would preserve
          > something very close to your given name in your Nova Roman name.

          Which was my initial thought, but I discarded it, because the gens Aemilia
          historically was patrician. Later I read on the NR website that the gens in
          Nova Roma has been re-cast to be plebeian. So I'll be using this one from now
          on. And no, I've not yet applied for citizenship.

          > Yahoo does things to
          > those not written in the Latin alphabet, however, or we could do Greek,
          > or maybe even Sanskrit here.

          I don't know enough Greek (and I'm a total Sanskrit dunce) for this to be an
          issue for me.

          > If you can write in Latin, feel free to do so here.

          For the sake of clarity, I'll probably keep the Latin to SIG postings. I'll
          have to have a look around what SIGs there are (more on that in private
          email).

          > > ATS: We certainly don¹t. Welcome to Nova Roma! Willkommen! (T.
          > > Flavius Aquila will tell me if I spelled that wrong...it¹s been a long
          > > time since I took German).

          Perfectly right!

          Valete!

          P. Aemilia Scaeva

          --
          Amelie Zapf (amy@...)
          Jazz Pianist, Bassist, Composer, Weichselstr. 17, 12045 Berlin, Germany
          Don't forget to check out http://www.ameliezapf.com/

          "When the power of love overcomes the love of power, the world will know
          peace." - Jimi Hendrix
          Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60573 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2009-01-17
          Subject: Re: Introductory posting
          Salve Scaeva,

          [...]
          >> *nod* A very challenging field. Do you work as a physical chemist?
          >
          > Yes and no. On December 2, I defended my PhD thesis that I wrote "on the
          > side".

          Congratulations Doctor! That's quite an accomplishment.

          > For three years now, I have lived exclusively off of being a
          > self-employed musician.

          If you can do that, you must be good. It's a tough way to make a living.

          > So I'm still sort-of "in the field" (which, in my
          > case, was lyotropic liquid crystals, if that rings a bell for you),

          It doesn't, though I'm sure I could look it up. I've known and worked
          with physical chemists over the years, and I know the work you people
          do is challenging and demanding.

          > but actually, I love my artistic lifestyle.

          It's something I've noticed with a lot of scientists. Many are very
          good musicians, playing in bands on weekends or in community
          orchestras. If nothing else it's a good way to have a social life and
          keep from being a complete nerd.

          Vale,

          CN-EQVIT-MARINVS
          Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60574 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2009-01-17
          Subject: a.d. XVI kal. Feb. - Aquarius
          Hodiernus dies ante diem XVI kalendas Februarius; haec dies
          comitialis est.


          "When this day is over, Phoebus, you will leave Capricorn,
          And take your course through the sign of the Water-Bearer." - Ovid,
          Fasti I

          "Here the Phrygian hunter is borne aloft on tawny wings, Gargara's
          range sinks downwards as he rises, and Troy grows dim beneath him;
          sadly stand his comrades; vainly the hounds weary their throats with
          barking, pursue his shadow or bay at the clouds." - Statius, Thebaid
          1.549

          "The King of Gods once felt the burning joy,
          And sigh'd for lovely Ganymede of Troy:
          Long was he puzzled to assume a shape
          Most fit, and expeditious for the rape;
          A bird's was proper, yet he scorns to wear
          Any but that which might his thunder bear.
          Down with his masquerading wings he flies,
          And bears the little Trojan to the skies;
          Where now, in robes of heav'nly purple drest,
          He serves the nectar at th' Almighty's feast,
          To slighted Juno an unwelcome guest." - Ovid, Metamorphosis X.152-161

          Today is the beginning of the cusp from Capricorn to Aquarius in the
          Zodiac. Aquarius is the Cup-Bearer of the gods, and got the job by
          being another victim of Iuppiter's amorous inclinations. He started
          out as Ganymede, prince of Troy, son of Tros of Dardania, and
          reportedly the most beautiful man ever to walk the face of the
          earth - the male counterpart to Helen of Troy. Iuppiter was passing
          by one day and, immediately upon seeing him, became overcome with
          lust, and determined to have the boy. Iuppiter transformed himself
          into a giant eagle, swooped down and grabbed Ganymede, carrying him
          off to Mount Olympus. All the gods - except Iuno, naturally -
          thought it was a great idea, and as a reward Ganymede replaced Hebe
          as the gods' cup-bearer.

          Tros, his father, was pretty upset, but Iuppiter bought him off with
          a pair of the swiftest horses ever to exist - so fast they could run
          over water: "They are of the stock that great Jove gave to Tros in
          payment for his son Ganymede, and are the finest that live and move
          under the sun." (Homer, Iliad 5.265) Apparently a couple of horses
          and the position of servant on Olympus was enought to satisfy Tros
          that his son was, so to speak, in good hands.

          Later, Iuppiter popped Ganymede into the constellation Aquarius for
          eternity.

          Valete bene!

          Cato
          Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60575 From: Complutensis Date: 2009-01-17
          Subject: Re: Another Nova Roma?

          Salve

           

          Yes a nice hotel in the ancient Emerita Augusta (today Mérida) in Spain .

           

          Valete

           

          M·CVR·COMPLVTENSIS
          Consul Novae Romae

          Senator
          Consul Hispaniae


          De: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com [mailto:Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com] En nombre de L Julia Aquila
          Enviado el: sábado, 17 de enero de 2009 0:51
          Para: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
          Asunto: [Nova-Roma] Re: Another Nova Roma?

           

          Salve,

          Of course there is the Hotel, with dot com instead of dot org;) I think
          it is in Spain..

          Vale

          Julia Aquila

          Se certificó que el correo entrante no contiene virus.
          Comprobada por AVG - http://www.avg.es
          Versión: 8.0.176 / Base de datos de virus: 270.10.8/1898 - Fecha de la versión: 16/01/2009 15:09

          Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60576 From: Appius Galerius Aurelianus Date: 2009-01-17
          Subject: Re: Another Nova Roma?
          Salvete,

          If you look in their gallery section you will see they have stolen our flag.

          Valete omnes,
          Ap.Galerius Aurelianus


          --- On Fri, 1/16/09, Gnaeus Caelius Ahenobarbus <cn.caelius@...> wrote:

          > From: Gnaeus Caelius Ahenobarbus <cn.caelius@...>
          > Subject: [Nova-Roma] Another Nova Roma?
          > To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
          > Date: Friday, January 16, 2009, 2:20 PM
          > Cn. Caelius Ahenobarbus omnibus s.p.d.
          >
          > This is interesting:
          >
          > http://novaroma.weebly.com/index.html
          >
          > --
          > Gnaeus Caelius Ahenobarbus
          > Lictor Curiatus et Accensus Consulibus
          > http://becomingnewthroughtheold.blogspot.com
          Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60577 From: dan mcelwain Date: 2009-01-18
          Subject: Re: R: [Nova-Roma] Another Nova Roma?
          Is he really for real? Combining the Roman Empire/Republic/and the USSR????

          --- On Fri, 1/16/09, Cn. Cornelius Lentulus <cn_corn_lent@...> wrote:
          From: Cn. Cornelius Lentulus <cn_corn_lent@...>
          Subject: R: [Nova-Roma] Another Nova Roma?
          To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
          Date: Friday, January 16, 2009, 5:48 PM

          Lentulus Caelio sal.

          Yes, yeasterday I also found them! An interesting and nice RPG, that combines the Marxist movements, the socialism, Roman history, tsarian Russia, Roman empire and republic. Interesting  (and a bit pathetic...) . That other Nova Roma is founded by one of our underage applicant, Raul Ausa, L. Martianius Corvus.

          Presumably he found Nova Roma on the internet, became enthusiastic and wants an "own" Nova Roma.

          I see however a copyright problem at the bottom of this page:

          http://novaroma. weebly.com/ gallery.html

          The NR flag is used there without the permission of NR Inc...




          --- Ven 16/1/09, Gnaeus Caelius Ahenobarbus <cn.caelius@yahoo. com> ha scritto:


          Cn. Caelius Ahenobarbus omnibus s.p.d.

          This is interesting:

          http://novaroma. weebly.com/ index.html

          --
          Gnaeus Caelius Ahenobarbus
          Lictor Curiatus et Accensus Consulibus
          http://becomingnewt hroughtheold. blogspot. com



          Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60578 From: Gnaeus Caelius Ahenobarbus Date: 2009-01-18
          Subject: Average Age Of Cives?
          Cn. Caelius Ahenobarbus omnibus s.p.d.

          Does anyone know the average age of cives of Nova Roma? Is that data available in our membership database so that a report could be run? Or has it been run already? If no to all the above, does anyone have any guesses? It seems like it could be in the 40s or 50s to me, but then I see many younger people, too.

          Optime valete!

          --
          Gnaeus Caelius Ahenobarbus
          Lictor Curiatus et Accensus Consulibus
          http://becomingnewthroughtheold.blogspot.com
          Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60579 From: Stefn Ullerius Venator Piperbarbus Date: 2009-01-18
          Subject: Re: R: [Nova-Roma] Another Nova Roma?
          Avete;

          On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 11:36 PM, dan mcelwain wrote:
          > Is he really for real? Combining the Roman Empire/Republic/and the USSR????
          >

          ...plus a skewed idea of constitutional monarchy.

          I think this is not for real (8 members listed as active IIRC), after
          having read over their entire site.

          This looks like a bunch of crack-pate, bored teenagers (even if they
          are older ,-) playing scatter-shot with some grandiose ideas to give
          themselves a sense of some signficance: ref. the revolutionary
          takeover of their "Grand Senate " by their version of the
          Comintern...plus their claimed territory is New Jersey and Jamaica.

          (Today West Orange, tomorrow the World!)

          =====================================
          In amicitia et fide
          Stephanus Ullerius Venator Piperbarbatus (pro tem)
          [Publius Ullerius Stephanus Venator]
          Civis circa Quintilis MMDCCLI a.u.c.
          Senator et Lictor
          Patrician, Paterfamilias
          Religio Septentrionalis - Poeta

          Dominus Sodalitas Coquuorum et Cerevisiae Coctorum
          http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Sodalis_Coq_et_Coq/

          http://www.myspace.com/venator_poetus
          http://anheathenreader.blogspot.com/
          http://www.catamount-grange-hearth.org/
          http://www.cafepress.com/catamountgrange
          --
          May the Holy Powers smile on our efforts.
          May the Spirits of our family lines nod in approval.
          May we be of Worth to our fellow Nova Romans.
          Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60580 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2009-01-18
          Subject: Re: Average Age Of Cives?
          Salve Ahenobarbe,

          The census database does have the date of birth of each citizen in it,
          so in principle we could calculate the average age. However, the
          average age of *all* citizens wouldn't tell us much about the average
          age of those who participate the most in our discussions. So I guess
          I'm wondering what it is you're looking for.

          Vale,

          CN-EQVIT-MARINVS

          Gnaeus Caelius Ahenobarbus <cn.caelius@...> writes:

          > Cn. Caelius Ahenobarbus omnibus s.p.d.
          >
          > Does anyone know the average age of cives of Nova Roma? Is that
          > data available in our membership database so that a report could be
          > run? Or has it been run already? If no to all the above, does anyone
          > have any guesses? It seems like it could be in the 40s or 50s to
          > me, but then I see many younger people, too.
          >
          > Optime valete!
          >
          > --
          > Gnaeus Caelius Ahenobarbus
          > Lictor Curiatus et Accensus Consulibus
          > http://becomingnewthroughtheold.blogspot.com
          >
          >
          >
          >
          >
          >
          > ------------------------------------
          >
          > Yahoo! Groups Links
          >
          >
          >
          >
          Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60581 From: Stefn Ullerius Venator Piperbarbus Date: 2009-01-18
          Subject: Re: Average Age Of Cives?
          Ave;

          On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 10:09 AM, Gnaeus Caelius Ahenobarbus wrote:
          >
          > Does anyone know the average age of cives of Nova Roma? [excision]
          >
          > Optime valete!
          >

          My average age is approximately 25 years 5 months and 1 week ,-)

          Machinatrix, well, a gentleman never tells what he knows about a lady.

          vale - Venii

          PS: The Censors may be able to put together such a demographic report.
          Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60582 From: Gnaeus Caelius Ahenobarbus Date: 2009-01-18
          Subject: Re: Average Age Of Cives?
          Caelius Marine s.p.d.

              I am curious about the raw average, not limited by other variables like posting frequency. After more thought, it would be interesting to have the following numbers:

          * Average age of all cives
          * Average age of all magistrates
          * Average age of all senatores

          Maximas gratias, et optime vale.
           
          --
          Gnaeus Caelius Ahenobarbus
          Lictor Curiatus et Accensus Consulibus
          http://becomingnewthroughtheold.blogspot.com



          Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60583 From: Charlie Collins Date: 2009-01-18
          Subject: Re: R: [Nova-Roma] Another Nova Roma?
          Salve,

          It looks like somebody was very bored while sitting at his computer in
          his bedroom on a weekend. Also, their Roman Names are terrible and is
          anyone planning to contact them about the use of the NR Flag on their
          site.

          Vale,
          Quintus Servilius Priscus

          On 1/18/09, Stefn Ullerius Venator Piperbarbus
          <famila.ulleria.venii@...> wrote:
          > Avete;
          >
          > On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 11:36 PM, dan mcelwain wrote:
          > > Is he really for real? Combining the Roman Empire/Republic/and the USSR????
          > >
          >
          > ...plus a skewed idea of constitutional monarchy.
          >
          > I think this is not for real (8 members listed as active IIRC), after
          > having read over their entire site.
          >
          > This looks like a bunch of crack-pate, bored teenagers (even if they
          > are older ,-) playing scatter-shot with some grandiose ideas to give
          > themselves a sense of some signficance: ref. the revolutionary
          > takeover of their "Grand Senate " by their version of the
          > Comintern...plus their claimed territory is New Jersey and Jamaica.
          >
          > (Today West Orange, tomorrow the World!)
          >
          > =====================================
          > In amicitia et fide
          > Stephanus Ullerius Venator Piperbarbatus (pro tem)
          > [Publius Ullerius Stephanus Venator]
          > Civis circa Quintilis MMDCCLI a.u.c.
          > Senator et Lictor
          > Patrician, Paterfamilias
          > Religio Septentrionalis - Poeta
          >
          > Dominus Sodalitas Coquuorum et Cerevisiae Coctorum
          > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Sodalis_Coq_et_Coq/
          >
          > http://www.myspace.com/venator_poetus
          > http://anheathenreader.blogspot.com/
          > http://www.catamount-grange-hearth.org/
          > http://www.cafepress.com/catamountgrange
          > --
          > May the Holy Powers smile on our efforts.
          > May the Spirits of our family lines nod in approval.
          > May we be of Worth to our fellow Nova Romans.
          >
          > ------------------------------------
          >
          > Yahoo! Groups Links
          >
          >
          >
          >
          Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60584 From: Lyn Date: 2009-01-18
          Subject: Re: R: [Nova-Roma] Another Nova Roma?

          Salvete, omnes,

           

          As long as they’re taking West Orange , do you suppose we could get them to take Paterson too?  And Newark ?

           

          Valete,

          Mamerca

           

          (who lived there long enough to know they’re “Paddisin” and “Nork.”)

           


          On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 11:36 PM, dan mcelwain wrote:

          > Is he really for real? Combining the Roman Empire/Republic/ and the
          w:st="on"> USSR ????
          >

          ...plus a skewed idea of constitutional monarchy.

          I think this is not for real (8 members listed as active IIRC), after
          having read over their entire site.

          This looks like a bunch of crack-pate, bored teenagers (even if they
          are older ,-) playing scatter-shot with some grandiose ideas to give
          themselves a sense of some signficance: ref. the revolutionary
          takeover of their "Grand Senate " by their version of the
          Comintern... plus their claimed territory is New Jersey and Jamaica .

          (Today West Orange , tomorrow the World!)

           


          [Lyn]  Maybe they _,_._,___

          No virus found in this incoming message.
          Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com
          Version: 8.0.176 / Virus Database: 270.10.9/1900 - Release Date: 1/18/2009 12:11 PM

          Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60585 From: Colin Brodd Date: 2009-01-18
          Subject: returning to internet
          C. Tullius Valerianus omnibus S.P.D.
           
          Salvete omnes!
           
          I apologize for my unexpected and extended absence to all Nova Romans who have been trying to contact me. My connection to the internet seems to be restored and I expect to be back up and running soon (once I dig myself out of nearly 1000 missed messages!)
          Valete,
          -- _____________________________________________________________
          C. TVLLIVS VALERIANVS GERMANICVS

          * Lictor Curiatus
          * Pontifex Minor Sacris Populi Romani Faciundis
          * Legatus Regionis Insulae Rhodensis (ab anno A.U.C. MMDCCLXI)
          * Scriba ad Latinitatem (A.U.C. MMDCCLXII)
          * Scriba Censoris Tiberii Galerii Paulini (A.U.C. MMDCCLXII)
          * Ad Templum Diis Immortalibus Romae Aedificandum!

          "Qua(e) patres difficillime
          adepti sunt nolite
          turpiter relinquere" -
          Monumentum Bradfordis, Tamaropoli, in civitate Massaciuseta
          (Bradford Monument, Plymouth, MA)

          Check out my books on Goodreads: <a href="http://www.goodreads.com/profile/Valerianus?utm_source=email_widget">http://www.goodreads.com/profile/Valerianus</a>
          Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60586 From: Chantal Gaudiano Date: 2009-01-18
          Subject: (no subject)
          P. Corva Gaudialis P. Valerie Scaevae omnesque s.p.d.

          Welcome, Scaeva! Nice to meet another lefthander and a musician. :) I'm more amateur, though--studying classical voice. I live in Texas and work in blindness rehabilitation. I look forward to becoming better acquainted.
          Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60587 From: Stefn Ullerius Venator Piperbarbus Date: 2009-01-18
          Subject: Re: R: [Nova-Roma] Another Nova Roma?
          Salve;

          On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 10:50 AM, Lyn wrote:
          > Salvete, omnes,
          >
          > As long as they're taking West Orange, do you suppose we could get them to
          > take Paterson too? And Newark?
          >
          > Valete,
          >
          > Mamerca
          >
          > (who lived there long enough to know they're "Paddisin" and "Nork.")
          >

          Much better if we get them to take over Camden, Vineland and Bayonne ,-)

          (Who has close friends in Jersey, around Freehold.)

          Vale - Venii
          Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60588 From: Cocceius Spinula Date: 2009-01-18
          Subject: Re: Another Nova Roma?
          Salve Priscus et Salvete omnes

          Quote:
          "(...)is anyone planning to contact them about the use of the NR Flag on their
          site."

          They have already been contacted by us.

          Vale et Valete bene,
          C. Cocceius Spinula
          Provincia Hispania, Lusitania
          Accensus Consulum et Procurator Regionis Lusitaniae

          --- Charlie Collins wrote:

          Salve,

          It looks like somebody was very bored while sitting at his computer in
          his bedroom on a weekend. Also, their Roman Names are terrible and is
          anyone planning to contact them about the use of the NR Flag on their
          site.

          Vale,
          Quintus Servilius Priscus


          Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60589 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2009-01-18
          Subject: a.d. XV kal. Feb. - Iuno
          Cato omnes in foro SPD

          Salvete!

          Hodiernus dies est ante diem XV kalendas Februarius; haec dies
          comitialis est.

          "I sing of golden-throned Hera whom Rhea bore. Queen of the immortals
          is she, surpassing all in beauty: she is the sister and the wife of
          loud-thundering Zeus, the glorious one whom all the blessed
          throughout high Olympus reverence and honor even as Zeus who
          delights in thunder." - Homeric Hymn to Hera

          "For Hera sent the Sphinx, whose mother was Echidna and her father
          Typhon; and she [the Sphinx] had the face of a woman, the breast and
          feet and tail of a lion, and the wings of a bird. And having learned
          a riddle from the Muses, she sat on Mount Phicium, and propounded it
          to the Thebans. And the riddle was this:-- What is that which has one
          voice and yet becomes four-footed and two-footed and three-footed?
          Now the Thebans were in possession of an oracle which declared that
          they should be rid of the Sphinx whenever they had read her riddle;
          so they often met and discussed the answer, and when they could not
          find it the Sphinx used to snatch away one of them and gobble him
          up." - Apollodorus, Library and Epitome 3.5.8

          "So he [Zeus] sat down there upon his throne; but Hera saw, and
          failed not to note how silver-footed Thetis, daughter of the old man
          of the sea, had taken counsel with him. Forthwith then she spoke to
          Zeus, son of Cronos, with mocking words: Who of the gods, crafty
          one, has now again taken counsel with you? Always is it your
          pleasure to hold aloof from me, and to give judgments which you have
          pondered in secret, nor have you ever brought yourself with a ready
          heart to declare to me the matter which you devise. In answer to her
          spoke the father of men and gods: Hera, do not hope to know all my
          words: hard will they prove for you, though you are my wife.
          Whatever it is fitting for you to hear, this none other shall know
          before you, whether of gods or men; but what I wish to devise apart
          from the gods, of all this do not in any way inquire nor ask. In
          answer to him spoke the ox-eyed lady Hera..." - Homer, Iliad 1.535-
          550

          In Greece today was celebrated in honor of the Queen of the gods,
          Hera - known to the Romans as Iuno. Iuno is often portrayed as the
          long-suffering wife of the hyper-sexual ruler of heaven, Iuppiter,
          subjected to endless embarrassments by Iuppiter's unceasing
          libidinous adventures. In part this is true, but Iuno also has had
          her moments.

          She led a revolt against Iuppiter, tired of his philandering, in the
          course of which Iuppiter was drugged and while comatose bound with a
          rope tied with a hundred knots. Once he had been subdued, the gods
          met and began, of course, to argue, unable to decide what exactly to
          do with the great Thunderer. Briareus, one of the Titans known as
          the Hechatonchires (hundred-handed ones), overheard the bickering
          and snuck up and untied Iuppiter.

          Furious, the king of the gods demanded the absolute future obedience
          of all those who had plotted against him, and they all agreed -
          except for Iuno. Proud and stubborn, she refused, and Iuppiter hung
          her from the heavens bounds with chains of gold. Weeping loudly,
          Iuno kept Iuppiter awake all night, until finally in her misery she
          had no choice but to submit.

          Iuno is revered as the patroness of all marriages - an odd choice
          given her own husband's adventures. Iuno is the mother of Mars,
          Vulcan, and Iuventas; she is both wife and sister to Iuppiter, and
          sister to Neptune. She is the patron goddess of the Roman people,
          and was worshipped together with Minerva and Iuppiter as the great
          trinity of protecting deities for the Roman State. This, too is
          odd, as Vergil portrays Iuno as particularly vicious and relentless
          in her attempts to defeat Aeneas' drive to found a new Troy - the
          city of Rome.

          As Iuno Moneta, she guarded the treasury and Mint of Rome, and as
          Iuno Lucina was guardian of childbirth. Her symbol is the peacock.

          Valete!

          Cato
          Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60590 From: Amelie Zapf Date: 2009-01-18
          Subject: Re: (unknown)
          P. Aemilia Scaeva P. Corvae Gaudiali omnibusque s.p.d.

          > I'm more amateur, though--studying classical voice.

          Ah, I wish I could. But unfortunately, I've got a rough, low alto that's more
          in the "blues belter" ballpark. So vocally, I'm really a one-trick pony
          (jazz/blues), although I work in a greater range of styles as an
          instrumentalist.

          Regarding your nomen "Corva" -- is there a gens Corva, or do you have some
          special affinity to ravens and crows?

          Vale et valete!
          Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60591 From: Gnaeus Iulius Caesar Date: 2009-01-18
          Subject: CURULE AEDILE EDICT 62-02: APPOINTMENT OF SCRIBA
          Cn. Iulius Caesar aed. Quiritibus sal.

          CURULE AEDILE EDICT 62-02: APPOINTMENT OF SCRIBA

          I hereby appoint Decimus Aemilius Severus as scribe. No oath is
          required of him.
          Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60592 From: viraj kamath Date: 2009-01-19
          Subject: (no subject)
          Can you suffix a Roman Numeral with the letters "th" like you do in Arabic numerals e.g. 4th or 5th ?


          Add more friends to your messenger and enjoy! Invite them now.
          Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60593 From: CARLOS ALBERTO GUIMARAES CREDE Date: 2009-01-19
          Subject: Re: (unknown)
           
                    wE HAVE NOT THIS DESIGNATION IN LATIN SO WRITE LIKE THIS primus, secundus, tertius, quartus, quintus, sextus, septimus, octauus, nonus, decimus
          To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
          From: viraj_kamath@...
          Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 18:04:36 +0530
          Subject: [Nova-Roma] (unknown)


          Can you suffix a Roman Numeral with the letters "th" like you do in Arabic numerals e.g. 4th or 5th ?


          Add more friends to your messenger and enjoy! Invite them now.




          É fácil compartilhar suas fotos com o Windows LiveT Arraste e solte
          Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60594 From: Cocceius Spinula Date: 2009-01-19
          Subject: Re: Roman Number
          Salve et Salvete omnes,

          Quote by Kamath:
          "Can you suffix a Roman Numeral with the letters "th" like you do in Arabic numerals e.g. 4th or 5th ?"

          >> Actually no, because the roman numerals are both cardinal and ordinal.
          e.g.
          1 (unus)     =  I  = 1 (primus or prima) > 1st
          2 (duo)       = II  = 2 (secundus) > 2nd
          3 (tres)       = III  = 3 (tertius) > 3rd
          10 (decem) = X = 10 (decimus) > 10th
          (In the nomative case, m, singular)

          It all depends on the context...

          Vale et Valete bene,
          C. Cocceius Spinula
          Provincia Hispania, Lusitania
          Accensus Consulum et Procurator Regionis Lusitaniae

          Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60595 From: yoshiyuki hiramoto Date: 2009-01-19
          Subject: Transition of Roman History
          I 'm now reading a fat book of the history of Rome.
          I got a question.
          Considering the transition of system of reigning Rome since BC 800, it
          could be described as follows;

          BC 753 The birth of legendary Roman nation
          Kings reigned nation throgh the election of kings ------ Democratic ?
          BC 509 Abolishment of Kingdam and Republicanism started ----
          More democratic ?
          BC 88 Roman people got civilian right
          ---------------------------- less democratic , discrimination
          started
          BC 27 Roman Imperialism ( Roman Empire ) started by Augustis ,
          and lasted for 500 years ------- much less democratic,
          Dictator came up,

          In short words, it looks like Democracy ----------> Imperialism (
          Dictatorism ) as the transition of Roman history.

          General speaking, other nations including Japan, Feudalism,
          Imperialism, Dictatorism at first -----------> Democracy .

          Why was Roman history's transition oposite with other nations'
          history in the transition of reign ?

          Please let me know the reason .

          Eddie


          =====================
          Posted through Grouply, the better way
          to access your Yahoo Groups like this one.
          http://www.grouply.com/?code=post



          type_D
          Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60596 From: Gaius Petronius Dexter Date: 2009-01-19
          Subject: Re: Transition of Roman History
          Salve Eddie,

          In my opinion, the Roman transition of way of powers with the similar
          transitions into others nations is perhaps not well-founded.

          The kings in Rome. It is a legendary period, kings are 7 of course,
          and all of them are kings elected. The historians look at the origin
          of these kings, some from Alba (Latin), some Sabins, some Etruscans,
          and think that these kings are more the personification of ancient
          people influences into Rome than real individuals. None king has had
          a dynasty, except the Tarquinii, but a dynasty with a father and a
          son, is a very little dynasty.

          So the Roman monarchy was not sure, the only thing is repeated is the
          Romans hated the kings. See the example of Caesar which wanted being
          king.

          The democracy. The Roman Republic was not a democracy. Less
          democratic than will be Roman Empire. During all the republican
          period, only the gentlemen and the rich men(equites) held the Roman
          republic.

          The "imperialism". It is the reign of the soldiers. It is perhaps the
          most democratic reign in Rome, a single soldier which do not speak a
          very nice Latin could be the emperor and the master of the world,
          generally for a very short reign. He won and lost his reign by his
          armies. There are very little dynasty and the most Romans were the
          first family/dynasty, the julio-claudians.

          Vale.

          C. Petronius Dexter
          Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60597 From: Gaius Petronius Dexter Date: 2009-01-19
          Subject: Re: (unknown)
          C. Petronius omnibus s.p.d.,

          > wE HAVE NOT THIS DESIGNATION IN LATIN SO WRITE LIKE THIS
          primus, secundus, tertius, quartus, quintus, sextus, septimus, octauus,
          nonus, decimus

          I think the question was, in English, can we write IVth. For example
          the IVth century.

          In French we can.

          We write : Nous sommes entrés dans le XXIème siècle.

          Optime vale.

          C. Petronius Dexter
          Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60598 From: Q. Valerius Poplicola Date: 2009-01-20
          Subject: Re: (unknown)
          In English we can also, although in Classics we see Latin more often,
          like s. IV (for saeculum IV, or fourth century).

          --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Gaius Petronius Dexter"
          <jfarnoud94@...> wrote:
          >
          >
          > C. Petronius omnibus s.p.d.,
          >
          > > wE HAVE NOT THIS DESIGNATION IN LATIN SO WRITE LIKE THIS
          > primus, secundus, tertius, quartus, quintus, sextus, septimus, octauus,
          > nonus, decimus
          >
          > I think the question was, in English, can we write IVth. For example
          > the IVth century.
          >
          > In French we can.
          >
          > We write : Nous sommes entrés dans le XXIème siècle.
          >
          > Optime vale.
          >
          > C. Petronius Dexter
          >
          Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60599 From: QFabiusMaxmi@aol.com Date: 2009-01-20
          Subject: Re: Transition of Roman History
          In a message dated 1/19/2009 5:15:48 P.M. Pacific Standard Time, yoshiyukihiramoto@... writes:
          In short words, it looks like Democracy ----------> Imperialism (
          Dictatorism ) as the transition of Roman history.

          General speaking, other nations including Japan, Feudalism,
          Imperialism, Dictatorism at first -----------> Democracy .

          Why was Roman history's transition oposite with other nations'
          history in the transition of reign ?
           
          The Monarchy was more like a military dictatorship, then a true Monarchy.  There was no true Royal House nor Royal Lineage.  The Rex also was not expected to rule alone, he was to use the advice of a group of trusted advisers, drawn from the most powerful clans of Latinum.
           
          Rome was NEVER a democracy.  When Brutus overthrew the last Rex, in 508,  Rome instituted a representative republic.  The voting was controlled by the richest families, who were also expected to contribute money to the State in times of need.  So they had a vested interest in the State.  What made Rome rather unique in the contemporary systems of the period, was that duality in magistrates, and the fact that they had to act in accord.
          Also, the advisory body controlled the chief magistrates' purse strings, which meant in direct contrast of the other Hellenistic nations, that the most powerful people of the State was not independent of it. 
          This meant, that any action the State carried out, most of the elected magistrates, and the advisory body had to be in agreement. 
          The populace itself was also protected from magisterial abuse, and any citizen could demand redress from another citizen if they felt wronged.  This gave a great steadiness to the population, and they in turn supported their leaders.
           
          This state of affairs continued until the end of Carthage.  Rome expanded into the power vacuum, and toppled the Hellenistic kingdoms and Leagues of City states, one by one.  With this came incredible wealth,  which allowed individuals to amass great power by becoming rich..  It also destroyed the backbone of the legiones, since yeoman farmers lost their lands to speculators and moved to the various cities.  By the time of Arausio (105 BC) the once powerful Roman army had no longer the various class of soldiers to make up the four lines, they were dependent on conscripts from the cities and Socii.  When the two hastily raised Consular Armies were defeated by the invading Germans, the old Republican military system was in tatters.
           
          Rome in an attempt to survive, allowed the very rich to run things, since they could afford to outfit armies needed.  The allies of Rome were the common mercenaries bought for such armies raised from the Italians.  They in turn felt that since they were protecting Roman interests they deserved more of a say.  When their champion in the Senate was assassinated, they took up arms against Rome.  The North of Italy stayed loyal, and Rome which always worked best in crisis defeated the South.  But the handwriting was on the wall.  The Romans might not win next time.  And so the Senate granted citizenship to all Italians.
           
          But, the gate was ajar, and the New Romans/Italians: the military leaders were on the rise.  When they clashed 40,000 men per side would march.  This lead to the Civil Wars, which finished the Republic in deed.  The name still remained but it was a sham.  Roman leaders who did not get their way, used brute force instead of honeyed words and bribes.    Brutus killing Caesar only delayed the inevitable. 
          By Philippi (48 BC) the only two Roman leaders which had supporters enough to reconstitute the Republic were killed, and the final clash between the two most powerful Generalissimos of the State clashed at Actium.  This left one man on top of the Roman Empire.
           
          Augustus realized that most Roman Aristocrats were ambitious, so he curbed that.  First, he even though he was an adopted Iulian he became the protector of the people, by consolidating the power of the Tribunes within his office.  Next, he eliminated popularity contests in elections, by assuming control of the Munus, forming State owned gladiator schools rather then allowing them to remain in private hands and allowing no large public shows to be performed without his approval.  Finally, he reduced the terms of the Consulship to six months rather then the full year.  This way he ensured that no one Consul could gather enough power to topple him.
          His greatest failure was to form a stable dynasty to ensure a transition of power from one heir to the next.  The Iulian Claudian dynasty lasted less then 100 years.   And Rome returned to the Civil Wars.
           
          Q. Fabius Maximus                    



          Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60600 From: M. Sempronia Pulla Date: 2009-01-20
          Subject: Archaeology News
          Salvete Omnes,

          Here's a hodge podge of recent articles on archaeological subjects about or somewhat related to ancient Rome or the ancient world during Roman times.

          Roman mosaic floor is uncovered in a Cotswold field
          http://www.thisisgloucestershire.co.uk/cotswolds/cotswoldsnews/Roman-mosaic-floor-uncovered-Cotswold-field/article-626192-detail/article.html

          Ancient tombs and artifacts recovered in Southern Italy
          http://www.stonepages.com/news/archives/003123.html

          Olympus standing tall in seven wonders vote
          http://www.ekathimerini.com/4dcgi/_w_articles_politics_2_19/01/2009_103904

          Ancient Greek vessel docks for Pompey refit
          http://www.independent.co.uk/news/science/ancient-greek-vessel-docks-for-pompey-refit-1418923.html

          Medicine in the Ancient World
          http://www.bib-arch.org/e-features/medicine-in-the-ancient-world.asp

          Tel Aviv University researcher reconstructs ancient Israelite faces
          http://www.israel21c.org/bin/en.jsp?enDispWho=Articles^l2419&enPage=BlankPage&enDisplay=view&enDispWhat=object&enVersion=0&enZone=Culture

          The most known Pan–Hellenic Symbols of the Macedonian Kingdom
          http://www.americanchronicle.com/articles/view/88044

          Bene Valete,
          Sempronia Pulla

          Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60601 From: yoshiyuki hiramoto Date: 2009-01-20
          Subject: Re: Transition of Roman History
          --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, QFabiusMaxmi@... wrote:
          >
          >
          > In a message dated 1/19/2009 5:15:48 P.M. Pacific Standard Time,
          > yoshiyukihiramoto@... writes:
          >
          > In short words, it looks like Democracy ----------> Imperialism (
          > Dictatorism ) as the transition of Roman history.
          >
          > General speaking, other nations including Japan, Feudalism,
          > Imperialism, Dictatorism at first -----------> Democracy .
          >
          > Why was Roman history's transition oposite with other nations'
          > history in the transition of reign ?
          >
          >
          >
          >
          > The Monarchy was more like a military dictatorship, then a true
          Monarchy.
          > There was no true Royal House nor Royal Lineage. The Rex also
          was not
          > expected to rule alone, he was to use the advice of a group of
          trusted advisers,
          > drawn from the most powerful clans of Latinum.
          >
          > Rome was NEVER a democracy. When Brutus overthrew the last Rex,
          in 508,
          > Rome instituted a representative republic. The voting was
          controlled by the
          > richest families, who were also expected to contribute money to
          the State in
          > times of need. So they had a vested interest in the State. What
          made Rome
          > rather unique in the contemporary systems of the period, was that
          duality in
          > magistrates, and the fact that they had to act in accord.
          > Also, the advisory body controlled the chief magistrates' purse
          strings,
          > which meant in direct contrast of the other Hellenistic nations,
          that the most
          > powerful people of the State was not independent of it.
          > This meant, that any action the State carried out, most of the
          elected
          > magistrates, and the advisory body had to be in agreement.
          > The populace itself was also protected from magisterial abuse, and
          any
          > citizen could demand redress from another citizen if they felt
          wronged. This gave
          > a great steadiness to the population, and they in turn supported
          their
          > leaders.
          >
          > This state of affairs continued until the end of Carthage. Rome
          expanded
          > into the power vacuum, and toppled the Hellenistic kingdoms and
          Leagues of City
          > states, one by one. With this came incredible wealth, which
          allowed
          > individuals to amass great power by becoming rich.. It also
          destroyed the backbone
          > of the legiones, since yeoman farmers lost their lands to
          speculators and
          > moved to the various cities. By the time of Arausio (105 BC) the
          once powerful
          > Roman army had no longer the various class of soldiers to make up
          the four
          > lines, they were dependent on conscripts from the cities and
          Socii. When the
          > two hastily raised Consular Armies were defeated by the invading
          Germans, the
          > old Republican military system was in tatters.
          >
          > Rome in an attempt to survive, allowed the very rich to run
          things, since
          > they could afford to outfit armies needed. The allies of Rome
          were the common
          > mercenaries bought for such armies raised from the Italians.
          They in turn
          > felt that since they were protecting Roman interests they
          deserved more of a
          > say. When their champion in the Senate was assassinated, they
          took up arms
          > against Rome. The North of Italy stayed loyal, and Rome which
          always worked
          > best in crisis defeated the South. But the handwriting was on
          the wall. The
          > Romans might not win next time. And so the Senate granted
          citizenship to all
          > Italians.
          >
          > But, the gate was ajar, and the New Romans/Italians: the military
          leaders
          > were on the rise. When they clashed 40,000 men per side would
          march. This
          > lead to the Civil Wars, which finished the Republic in deed. The
          name still
          > remained but it was a sham. Roman leaders who did not get their
          way, used brute
          > force instead of honeyed words and bribes. Brutus killing
          Caesar only
          > delayed the inevitable.
          > By Philippi (48 BC) the only two Roman leaders which had
          supporters enough
          > to reconstitute the Republic were killed, and the final clash
          between the two
          > most powerful Generalissimos of the State clashed at Actium.
          This left one
          > man on top of the Roman Empire.
          >
          > Augustus realized that most Roman Aristocrats were ambitious, so
          he curbed
          > that. First, he even though he was an adopted Iulian he became
          the protector
          > of the people, by consolidating the power of the Tribunes within
          his office.
          > Next, he eliminated popularity contests in elections, by assuming
          control of
          > the Munus, forming State owned gladiator schools rather then
          allowing them
          > to remain in private hands and allowing no large public shows to
          be performed
          > without his approval. Finally, he reduced the terms of the
          Consulship to six
          > months rather then the full year. This way he ensured that no
          one Consul
          > could gather enough power to topple him.
          > His greatest failure was to form a stable dynasty to ensure a
          transition of
          > power from one heir to the next. The Iulian Claudian dynasty
          lasted less
          > then 100 years. And Rome returned to the Civil Wars.
          >
          > Q. Fabius Maximus
          > **************A Good Credit Score is 700 or Above. See yours in
          just 2 easy
          > steps!
          > (http://pr.atwola.com/promoclk/100000075x1215855013x1201028747/aol?
          redir=http://www.freecreditreport.com/pm/default.aspx?sc=668072%
          26hmpgID=62%26bcd=De
          > cemailfooterNO62)


          Hi F. Maximus,

          Thank you for your detail explanation responding my question.

          My next question is why they transited from Republicism, the
          senator reigned system to Empirism , Imperialism ?
          Were there any seeds of problem to maintain Republicism , the
          senator reigned system in those days , before transitting to
          Empire ?
          Maybe, Roman nation became too wide spreaded to manage by
          senators.

          Regards,

          Eddie


          >
          Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60602 From: yoshiyuki hiramoto Date: 2009-01-21
          Subject: Re: Transition of Roman History
          --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Gaius Petronius Dexter"
          <jfarnoud94@...> wrote:
          >
          > Salve Eddie,
          >
          > In my opinion, the Roman transition of way of powers with the
          similar
          > transitions into others nations is perhaps not well-founded.
          >
          > The kings in Rome. It is a legendary period, kings are 7 of
          course,
          > and all of them are kings elected. The historians look at the
          origin
          > of these kings, some from Alba (Latin), some Sabins, some
          Etruscans,
          > and think that these kings are more the personification of ancient
          > people influences into Rome than real individuals. None king has
          had
          > a dynasty, except the Tarquinii, but a dynasty with a father and a
          > son, is a very little dynasty.
          >
          > So the Roman monarchy was not sure, the only thing is repeated is
          the
          > Romans hated the kings. See the example of Caesar which wanted
          being
          > king.
          >
          > The democracy. The Roman Republic was not a democracy. Less
          > democratic than will be Roman Empire. During all the republican
          > period, only the gentlemen and the rich men(equites) held the
          Roman
          > republic.
          >
          > The "imperialism". It is the reign of the soldiers. It is perhaps
          the
          > most democratic reign in Rome, a single soldier which do not speak
          a
          > very nice Latin could be the emperor and the master of the world,
          > generally for a very short reign. He won and lost his reign by his
          > armies. There are very little dynasty and the most Romans were the
          > first family/dynasty, the julio-claudians.
          >
          > Vale.
          >
          > C. Petronius Dexter

          Hi Petronius Dexter,

          Thank you for your comprehensive explanation to me.
          My next question is;

          Why did transit from Roman Republic to Roman Empire ?
          Were there any seeds of problem in Roman Republic days to
          maintain Republicism and grew to transit to Empirism ?
          What were those seeds of problems ?
          I guess Roman Republic nation became too wide spreaded ,like
          invaded into almost all Europe nations to control orderly by
          senators oriented system. So Caeser choosed Empirism system and
          tried to become the first Empire , but was assasinated by others
          including Bruitus as you know . Caeser did not aim dictatorship to
          reign Roman nation , but he thought the Empirism way was the best
          way to reign orderly big Roman nation including ruled nation, or
          ruled areas spreaded to almost all European area in those days.

          Regards,

          Eddie
          >
          Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60603 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2009-01-21
          Subject: Edictum Praetorium - Prorogation of edicts
          Edictum Praetorium 2762-02,
          Prorogation of praetorian edicts issued by the praetors for 2761 auc

          In accordance with the Lex Arminia de ratione edictorum,
          [http://www.novaroma.org/nr/Lex_Arminia_de_ratione_edictorum_(Nova_Roma)]
          which provides magistrates of Nova Roma the authority to continue edicta
          issued by their predecessors, we hereby continue the following edicta
          issued by our predecessors:
          Edictum about posts in Nova Roma Announce List
          [http://groups.yahoo.com/group/NovaRoma-Announce/message/1554%5d

          Edictum de Sermone, as modified by EDICTVM PRAETORIVM DE SERMONE II
          (CVRIATI IVLI IV)
          [http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma/message/55372}.

          Datum sub manibus nostris
          Pasadenae, Terra Maria, Mediatlanticae, et Cadomagi Galliae,
          a.d. XIII Kal. Feb. MMDCCLXII a.u.c. (21 Ian. 2009 c.c.)
          M. Curiatius Complutensis M. Iulius Severus coss.

          CN-EQVIT-MARINVS--PUB-MEMM-ALBUCIVS
          Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60604 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2009-01-21
          Subject: Edictum Praetorium - Prorogation of edicts
          Edictum Praetorium 2762-02,
          Prorogation of praetorian edicts issued by the praetors for 2761 auc

          In accordance with the Lex Arminia de ratione edictorum,
          [http://www.novaroma.org/nr/Lex_Arminia_de_ratione_edictorum_(Nova_Roma)]
          which provides magistrates of Nova Roma the authority to continue edicta
          issued by their predecessors, we hereby continue the following edicta
          issued by our predecessors:
          Edictum about posts in Nova Roma Announce List
          [http://groups.yahoo.com/group/NovaRoma-Announce/message/1554%5d

          Edictum de Sermone, as modified by EDICTVM PRAETORIVM DE SERMONE II
          (CVRIATI IVLI IV)
          [http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma/message/55372}.

          Datum sub manibus nostris
          Pasadenae, Terra Maria, Mediatlanticae, et Cadomagi Galliae,
          a.d. XV Kal. Feb. MMDCCLXII a.u.c. (19 Ian. 2009 c.c.)
          M. Curiatius Complutensis M. Iulius Severus coss.

          CN-EQVIT-MARINVS--PUB-MEMM-ALBUCIVS
          Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60605 From: M. Sempronia Pulla Date: 2009-01-21
          Subject: Ancient History/Rome Lovers Jokes
          Salvete Omnes!

          I just read this on the Facebook group "You Love Ancient History A Little Too Much When..." and cracked up. So, I felt like sharing for those who have not seen it before because everyone needs a laugh once and a while. :) It's mostly Roman-oriented. Enjoy!

          Bene Valete!
          Sempronia Pulla
          =========
          You know you love ancient history a little too much when..

          1) You can't wait until your 30th birthday, because then you get to enter the Senate.

          2) You insult your siblings in Latin, and get away with it, because your parents have no idea what you said.

          3) You know more about forum gossip than what's happening with celebrities today.

          4) You made togas and/or greaves for your Barbies/GI Joes.

          5) You say you're a republican.....and delineate between boni and optimates.

          6) You know who the boni and the optimates were.

          7) You threaten to deny your enemies fire and water within 100 miles, and to throw them off the Tarpeian rock.

          8) You think a toga is dead sexy.

          9) You got excited as a child when you heard the Senate was debating on
          CSPANN, and were depressed when you didn't see the conscript fathers.

          10) You can and do have an informed discussion on whether Caesar killed the
          republic, or whether Sulla and Marius set a precedent for him.

          11) You can't resist pointing out, whenever democracy crops up in
          conversation (assuming you haven't initiated it) that Athens was a
          better example than modern societies.

          12) You think calling someone an oligarch is a deadly insult.

          13) You think that litigation is the answer to most problems, including ridding the world of troublesome politicians.

          14) You can't wait till your 18th birthday, because you get the right to mouth off in public settings.

          15) Mention of the Spartans is bound to provoke a negative reaction. Anyone
          who praises them is clearly an enemy of democracy. TRAITORS!

          16) You know more about the infrastructures of ancient democracies than about the political system of your own country today.

          17) You laugh at topical jokes in Aristophanes, especially ones about Cleon.

          18) You dressed up like a Legionnaire for consecutive Halloweens. Your
          parents may or may not have claimed you were adopted when taking you
          around the neighborhood.

          19) You find yourself identifying with the Greeks in to the point where you say things like "when we beat the Persians at Marathon" or "that damned Alexander".

          20) You have the urge to date all materials as B.C.E.....if only **sigh**

          21) You correct your high school teacher when she claims Octavian was the
          first emperor. You then digress into how Octavian and Augustus were the
          same person. People stare at you weirdly while you do so.

          22) Your "To Do" list includes the item "take out those pesky Parthians - soon!" and yet it never gets done.

          33) You can actually pronounce the names "Gaius Julius Caesar" and
          "Pompeius Magnus" correctly *and* are able to give a recap of why they
          turned from friends to enemies.

          34) When in the voting booth, you write in the name Gracchi. You then complain because you think your tribe should have voted before all the other people standing in line.

          35) You feel the need to conquer new lands, merely to add another descriptor to your name. Africanus, anyone?

          36) You compare your significant other to one of your ancient heroes, and find them lacking.

          37) Paul Cartledge is your GOD.

          38) When you say "It's all Greek to me" it means you completely understand something.

          39) You drop latin phrases into essays, casual conversations...and drunken texts/phone calls.

          and finally......
          You would tap any of the following men:
          Sulla, Marius, Cato, Cicero, Scaurus, Pompey, Caesar, Titus Labenius, Marc
          Antony, Octavian/Augustus, Brutus, Alexander the Great, Phillip,
          Darius, Xerxes, Ptolemy, Crassus, Hannibal, Hamilcar, Hadsdrubal,
          Pliny, Plutarch....

          Or Women:
          Cleopatra, Fulvia, Aurelia, Arsinoe, Barsine, Roxanna, Livia Drusilla...
          Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60606 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2009-01-21
          Subject: Re: Ancient History/Rome Lovers Jokes
          Salve Pulla,

          "M. Sempronia Pulla" <belovedmetrobius@...> writes:

          [snippity snip]

          > 21) You correct your high school teacher when she claims Octavian was the
          > first emperor. You then digress into how Octavian and Augustus were the
          > same person. People stare at you weirdly while you do so.

          That's Gaius Iulius Caesar Octavianus.

          (Hmmph. These kids these days...)

          Vale,

          CN-EQVIT-MARINVS
          Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60607 From: QFabiusMaxmi@aol.com Date: 2009-01-21
          Subject: Re: Transition of Roman History
          In a message dated 1/20/2009 7:02:18 P.M. Pacific Standard Time, yoshiyukihiramoto@... writes:
          Maybe, Roman nation became too wide spreaded to manage by
          senators.
           
          This is exactly what happened.  With the Second Punic War, the Consuls and Praetors were in the field during the Italian Campaign and unavailable to lead.  The Senate governed Rome, rather effectively during this time, but was unable to continue to govern as the Empire spread.  This was because too many Senators has vested interests in the various provinces to be objective, and avarice was the theme of the post Punic War recovery.
           
          Had Rome reverted back to its humble city state after the War who knows how long the Republic would have survived?
           
          Q. Fabius Maximus         


          A Good Credit Score is 700 or Above. See yours in just 2 easy steps!
          Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60608 From: Maxima Valeria Messallina Date: 2009-01-21
          Subject: Re: Obituary: Postuma Sempronia Graccha Placidia
          My condolences to her family and friends. 
          I will add her to my prayers for all deceased Nova Romans.
           
          Maxima Valeria Messallina
          Sacerdos Vestalis


          --- On Sat, 1/10/09, Cn. Cornelius Lentulus <cn_corn_lent@...> wrote:

          From: Cn. Cornelius Lentulus <cn_corn_lent@...>
          Subject: [Nova-Roma] Obituary: Postuma Sempronia Graccha Placidia
          To: "Nova Roma ML" <nova-roma@yahoogroups.com>
          Date: Saturday, January 10, 2009, 2:52 AM

          FROM THE CENSORIAL OFFICE

          Cn. Lentulus scriba censorius, pontifex, Quiritibus s. p. d.

          It is my sad duty to inform you, Quirites, that our fellow citizen

          Postuma Sempronia Graccha Placidia

          of Provincia Britannia, passed away. We offer our condolences to her friends and family. We keep her memory with us.

          Rest in peace!

          D. M.

          Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus,
          P O N T I F E X
          SCRIBA CENSORIUS


          Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60609 From: Juan A. Garcia-Fuertes Date: 2009-01-21
          Subject: Re: Transition of Roman History

          Salve

          The question of what caused the Roman republic to transition to the Principate has been the million dollar question for a long time. What could have caused that an advanced political system such as the Roman republic with its checks and balances (meaning that the minority view could prevail over the majority) superior to the Greek democracy with its majority rule which allowed the abuse of the minority view or individual rights? A system that lasted for over 500 years versus less than 75 for the Greek would simply convert to a type of monarchy? After having read the works of Gibbons, Titus Livius, and the insightful view of Polybius, and others I have come to the conclusion that it was the search for stability since the old republican system did not have the ability to change easily.

          I believe that Caesar was trying from its Populare point of view to look for the required design changes, which he thought that some of it had to be done with the powers of dictator (a legal position within the system). There is some credibility to this point although he did not explicitly said so. It is also found in the US Founding Fathers who also were looking for those changes when selecting a redesigned republic: changes to the old republic including to allow changes to the constitution when required. Some of those were: elected Senate, longer term for the Executive but keeping its proportional election, democratic elections for the House of representatives and senators, reduction of the houses of the people from 3 to 1, the constitution change process, etc.

          Europe (England, Spain, Belgium and, without monarchs, the others except France), on the other hand, kept a variation of the Principate (parliamentary) system. Specially England: Senate or Upper House mainly hereditary and for life, without checks and balances rules (filibuster, etc.) against the executive held by a prime minister but with the consent of the monarch, etc. This view is generally expressed by Gibbons.

          It is difficult to compare the Roman system and its transition to the modern era to other countries’. Although some, like India, have a class system none that I know of have had an express hatred for the monarchy, or the specific goal of people’s rights as the Roman republic had and which it set in the constitution, which they invented, early in its history. For example, speaking  of Japan, or South American countries so called democracies one has to identify which type of system they actually have. Japan has a system close to the English parliamentary system (or Principate like) while the Latin American countries have republics US style but heavily underused – senate does not have its peculiar rules or the executive veto used rarely or not used.

          The second version of the Roman republic, - the US model - has resulted in a more stable, so far, system which allows for constitutional changes, and includes some level of democracy although totally superseded by the checks and balances. This seems, at least to me, to have been the objective from the beginning.

          Vale      

           

          Gaius Sertorius Baeticus

           



          __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 3782 (20090121) __________

          The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.

          http://www.eset.com
          Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60611 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2009-01-22
          Subject: a.d. XI kal. Feb. - the Lyre
          OSD C. Equitius Cato

          Salvete omnes!

          Hodiernus dies est ante diem XI Kalendas Februarius; haec dies fastus est.


          "The Lyre sets in the evening: it is a rainy day." - Columella

          "Outside the cave he [Hermes] found a tortoise feeding. He cleaned it
          out, and stretched across the shell strings made from the cattle he
          had sacrificed, and when he had thus devised a lyre he also invented a
          plectrum ... When Apollon heard the lyre, he exchanged the cattle for
          that. And as Hermes was tending the cattle, this time he fashioned a
          shepherd's pipe which he proceeded to play. Covetous also of this,
          Apollon offered him the golden staff which he held when he herded
          cattle. But Hermes wanted both the staff and proficiency in the art of
          prophecy in return for the pipe. So he was taught how to prophesy by
          means of pebbles, and gave Apollon the pipe." - Apollodorus, The
          Library 3.112-115

          "Within the temple of Apollon Lykios in Argos is a statue of ...
          Hermes with a tortoise which he has caught to make a lyre." -
          Pausanias, Guide to Greece 2.19.6-7

          "Constellation Lyre: Others say that when Mercury [Hermes] first made
          the lyre on Mount Cyllene in Arcadia, he made it with seven strings to
          correspond to the number of Atlantides, since Maia, his mother, was of
          their company. Later, when he had driven away the cattle of Apollo and
          had been caught in the act, to win pardon more easily, at Apollo's
          request he gave him permission to claim the invention of the lyre, and
          received from him a certain staff as reward ... Apollo took the lyre,
          and is said to have taught Orpheus on it, and after he himself had
          invented the cithara, he gave the lyre to Orpheus." - Hyginus,
          Astronomica 2.7

          "The clever device of the lyre, it is said, was invented by Hermes,
          who constructed it of two horns and a crossbar and a tortoise-shell;
          and he presented it first to Apollon and the Mousai, then to Amphion
          of Thebes." - Philostratus the Elder, Imagines 1.10

          The lyre was invented by the god Mercury (Hermes). The youngest of the gods, as
          a baby Mercury tried to steal Apollo's cattle, first using the trick of driving them
          backwards so that their hoofprints would not give their location away; upon discovering
          the theft, Apollo was enraged until Mercury distracted him by creating the first lyre and
          teaching him how to use it.

          The most famous episode involving the lyre is most likely that of Orpheus
          attempting to bring his wife Eurydice back from the dead. The son of the muse Calliope
          and either Oeagrus of Thrace or Apollo, Apollo gave him a golden lyre when he was a child
          and taught him how to play it; his mother taught him how to sing with it. Such was
          his skill that Orpheus could calm any beast, still any storm, bring peace and serenity to
          Nature itself when he played the lyre.

          When his wife Eurydice died (Aristaeus - another son of Apollo - was chasing her
          and ran her into a nest of snakes which promptly bit her), Orpheus was a mess and
          couldn't play anything but songs so sad that the gods themselves could not stop crying.
          Exhausted and miserable, Iuppiter told Orpheus to go away and try to persuade Pluto to
          release Eurydice from Hades. Orpheus descended to the Underworld and there his playing
          softened the heart of even Pluto, and that god allowed him to walk Euryidice back to the
          land of the living with (surprise!) one proviso - that Orpheus not look upon his wife until
          they had left the Underworld. You know, of course, how that ended.*

          Orpheus himself had a rather gruesome end: when Dionysis invaded Thrace, his
          female followers the Maenads tore Orpheus into pieces. His head floated down the river
          Hebrus and out to the island of Lesbos, along with the lyre; the lyre ends up near the
          temple of Apollo on Lesbos and Apollo asks Iuppiter to immortalize it. Iuppiter agreed
          and flung the lyre into the heavens, where it hangs now between Hercules and Cygnus.

          Valete bene!

          Cato

          *hint: not well
          Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60612 From: phoenixfyre17 Date: 2009-01-22
          Subject: Religio Hellenica?
          Salvete omnes,

          Not to be rude or anything, but whats with the daily calendar postings
          being solely composed of Greek-related material? Last I knew, we are
          Nova *Roma* and worship the Gods of *Rome*, who are certainly not
          alternate names for Greek deities.

          The postings are interesting, but are quite off topic in my opinion.

          In Pax Deorum,
          Nero
          Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60613 From: dan mcelwain Date: 2009-01-22
          Subject: Re: Religio Hellenica?
          Salvete,
           
          True we are Nova Roma and it does have it's own unique root culture and many Gods and Goddesses who are uniqe to Roma (Like Roma herself!), but still Roma does owe alot of it's culture, Democracy and the Republic itself! To the Greeks.
           
          Would you say Apollo is Apollo?
           
          -Soon to be Tiberius Apollonius Taurus
           


          --- On Thu, 1/22/09, phoenixfyre17 <phoenixfyre17@...> wrote:
          From: phoenixfyre17 <phoenixfyre17@...>
          Subject: [Nova-Roma] Religio Hellenica?
          To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
          Date: Thursday, January 22, 2009, 9:12 PM

          Salvete omnes,

          Not to be rude or anything, but whats with the daily calendar postings
          being solely composed of Greek-related material? Last I knew, we are
          Nova *Roma* and worship the Gods of *Rome*, who are certainly not
          alternate names for Greek deities.

          The postings are interesting, but are quite off topic in my opinion.

          In Pax Deorum,
          Nero


          Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60614 From: dan mcelwain Date: 2009-01-22
          Subject: Re: Religio Hellenica?
          Ah and Roma, the Republic and Empire, were host to a myriad of cultures and religions. Their was the Roman culture, the Greek Culture, Egyptian Culture, Gaulish, Mesopotamian, and so forth. Each spreading within the Roma Republic and Empire without any discrimination or seclusion generally. The Mystery Religions are a interesting testament to this. Anyway, all of these cultures were accepted into the Roman Empire, despite having different cultures they were united under common reasons within the fabric of Rome itself. Of course, the Roman culture spread out as well and people did not exclude it.
           The Hellenist culture was the largest and strongest, as I mentioned beforem painting Roman culture as well.

          --- On Thu, 1/22/09, phoenixfyre17 <phoenixfyre17@...> wrote:
          From: phoenixfyre17 <phoenixfyre17@...>
          Subject: [Nova-Roma] Religio Hellenica?
          To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
          Date: Thursday, January 22, 2009, 9:12 PM

          Salvete omnes,

          Not to be rude or anything, but whats with the daily calendar postings
          being solely composed of Greek-related material? Last I knew, we are
          Nova *Roma* and worship the Gods of *Rome*, who are certainly not
          alternate names for Greek deities.

          The postings are interesting, but are quite off topic in my opinion.

          In Pax Deorum,
          Nero


          Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60615 From: Numero 2 Date: 2009-01-23
          Subject: Re: Religio Hellenica?
          Culture is not religion. The religio romana is different from greek
          religion, even if they are both indoeuropean and are very similar.
          It's uncorrect tell about religion and use exemple of culture and politics.
          The religio romana is the connection of the italics religions (etruscan,
          sannitica, umbra, venetica, etc.)
          The culture is another thing.
          You can find the differences also in ritual tipology.

          dan mcelwain ha scritto:
          >
          > Ah and Roma, the Republic and Empire, were host to a myriad of
          > cultures and religions. Their was the Roman culture, the Greek
          > Culture, Egyptian Culture, Gaulish, Mesopotamian, and so forth. Each
          > spreading within the Roma Republic and Empire without any
          > discrimination or seclusion generally. The Mystery Religions are a
          > interesting testament to this. Anyway, all of these cultures were
          > accepted into the Roman Empire, despite having different cultures they
          > were united under common reasons within the fabric of Rome itself. Of
          > course, the Roman culture spread out as well and people did not
          > exclude it.
          > The Hellenist culture was the largest and strongest, as I mentioned
          > beforem painting Roman culture as well.
          >
          > --- On *Thu, 1/22/09, phoenixfyre17 /<phoenixfyre17@...>/* wrote:
          >
          > From: phoenixfyre17 <phoenixfyre17@...>
          > Subject: [Nova-Roma] Religio Hellenica?
          > To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
          > Date: Thursday, January 22, 2009, 9:12 PM
          >
          > Salvete omnes,
          >
          > Not to be rude or anything, but whats with the daily calendar
          > postings
          > being solely composed of Greek-related material? Last I knew, we are
          > Nova *Roma* and worship the Gods of *Rome*, who are certainly not
          > alternate names for Greek deities.
          >
          > The postings are interesting, but are quite off topic in my opinion.
          >
          > In Pax Deorum,
          > Nero
          >
          >
          >
          Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60616 From: QFabiusMaxmi@aol.com Date: 2009-01-23
          Subject: Re: Transition of Roman History
          In a message dated 1/21/2009 6:45:56 P.M. Pacific Standard Time, jagf1@... writes:
          I believe that Caesar was trying from its Populare point of view to look for the required design changes, which he thought that some of it had to be done with the powers of dictator (a legal position within the system). There is some credibility to this point although he did not explicitly said so.
          And I believe you don't have the evidence to back up such a claim.  Or do you believe that "First Man of Rome" is Roman History?
           
          Q. Fabius Maximus


          From Wall Street to Main Street and everywhere in between, stay up-to-date with the latest news.
          Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60617 From: philippe cardon Date: 2009-01-23
          Subject: Re: Transition of Roman History
          Right or wrong, all people seek for a chief
          that the first reason of the end of the republic
          second: the hellenistic ideology of the King-savior, of the chief leaded by Tyche who must be worshipped as a god
          thrid the incapacity of republics in antiquity to create a house of representatives
          direct democraty was possible only in little state
          in rome, most of the citizens lived too far to come to comicia nd take part in politics
          Varro
          ----- Original Message -----
          Sent: Friday, January 23, 2009 12:21 PM
          Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: Transition of Roman History

          In a message dated 1/21/2009 6:45:56 P.M. Pacific Standard Time, jagf1@verizon. net writes:
          I believe that Caesar was trying from its Populare point of view to look for the required design changes, which he thought that some of it had to be done with the powers of dictator (a legal position within the system). There is some credibility to this point although he did not explicitly said so.
          And I believe you don't have the evidence to back up such a claim.  Or do you believe that "First Man of Rome" is Roman History?
           
          Q. Fabius Maximus


          From Wall Street to Main Street and everywhere in between, stay up-to-date with the latest news.


          ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
          Orange vous informe que cet e-mail a été contrôlé par l'anti-virus mail.
          Aucun virus connu à ce jour par nos services n'a été détecté.


          Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60618 From: Lucia Livia Plauta Date: 2009-01-23
          Subject: Re: Religio Hellenica?
          L. Livia Plauta "numero duobus" sal.

          Who are you, numero 2? Do I know you from the Pomerium list?
          It would be nice if everyone who posts would sign their posts with
          their roman name, specially if it's not identifiable by the Yahoo
          account name.

          That said, I think the "greek" calendar posts are due to the fact
          that Pontifex Maximus Piscinus has stopped posting, so all that's
          left it Cato's calendar posts.
          I hope Piscinus is all right.

          Optime vale,
          Livia


          --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Numero 2 <2@...> wrote:
          >
          > Culture is not religion. The religio romana is different from greek
          > religion, even if they are both indoeuropean and are very similar.
          > It's uncorrect tell about religion and use exemple of culture and
          politics.
          > The religio romana is the connection of the italics religions
          (etruscan,
          > sannitica, umbra, venetica, etc.)
          > The culture is another thing.
          > You can find the differences also in ritual tipology.
          >
          > dan mcelwain ha scritto:
          > >
          > > Ah and Roma, the Republic and Empire, were host to a myriad of
          > > cultures and religions. Their was the Roman culture, the Greek
          > > Culture, Egyptian Culture, Gaulish, Mesopotamian, and so forth.
          Each
          > > spreading within the Roma Republic and Empire without any
          > > discrimination or seclusion generally. The Mystery Religions are
          a
          > > interesting testament to this. Anyway, all of these cultures were
          > > accepted into the Roman Empire, despite having different cultures
          they
          > > were united under common reasons within the fabric of Rome
          itself. Of
          > > course, the Roman culture spread out as well and people did not
          > > exclude it.
          > > The Hellenist culture was the largest and strongest, as I
          mentioned
          > > beforem painting Roman culture as well.
          > >
          > > --- On *Thu, 1/22/09, phoenixfyre17 /<phoenixfyre17@...>/* wrote:
          > >
          > > From: phoenixfyre17 <phoenixfyre17@...>
          > > Subject: [Nova-Roma] Religio Hellenica?
          > > To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
          > > Date: Thursday, January 22, 2009, 9:12 PM
          > >
          > > Salvete omnes,
          > >
          > > Not to be rude or anything, but whats with the daily calendar
          > > postings
          > > being solely composed of Greek-related material? Last I knew,
          we are
          > > Nova *Roma* and worship the Gods of *Rome*, who are certainly
          not
          > > alternate names for Greek deities.
          > >
          > > The postings are interesting, but are quite off topic in my
          opinion.
          > >
          > > In Pax Deorum,
          > > Nero
          > >
          > >
          > >
          >
          Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60619 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2009-01-23
          Subject: Re: Religio Hellenica?
          Cato Neroni omnibusque in foro SPD

          Salve Nero et salvete omnes.

          Actually, they are overwhelmingly almost exactly alternate names for the gods of the
          Greeks. This does not diminish them in any way.

          Vale et valete,

          Cato



          --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "phoenixfyre17" <phoenixfyre17@...> wrote:
          >
          > Salvete omnes,
          >
          > Not to be rude or anything, but whats with the daily calendar postings
          > being solely composed of Greek-related material? Last I knew, we are
          > Nova *Roma* and worship the Gods of *Rome*, who are certainly not
          > alternate names for Greek deities.
          >
          > The postings are interesting, but are quite off topic in my opinion.
          >
          > In Pax Deorum,
          > Nero
          >
          Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60620 From: Daniel M Date: 2009-01-23
          Subject: Re: Religio Hellenica?
          Culture may not be religion but the two are very intertwined.

          Personally in my view, more then one God or Goddess of Greece is a
          God or Goddess in Roma.

          Ah, but remember the Etruscans were heavily influenced by none other
          then the Greeks. As Roma expanded, it absorbed culutre and religions
          of Hellenist origin yet still.

          I am not saying that Religio and Hellenism are exactly the same, I am
          just pointing out that the Religio and Roman Culture HAS been
          influenced by Hellenism. That their is a reason to have Hellenica
          realted material and not to be removed.

          --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Numero 2 <2@...> wrote:
          >
          > Culture is not religion. The religio romana is different from greek
          > religion, even if they are both indoeuropean and are very similar.
          > It's uncorrect tell about religion and use exemple of culture and
          politics.
          > The religio romana is the connection of the italics religions
          (etruscan,
          > sannitica, umbra, venetica, etc.)
          > The culture is another thing.
          > You can find the differences also in ritual tipology.
          >
          > dan mcelwain ha scritto:
          > >
          > > Ah and Roma, the Republic and Empire, were host to a myriad of
          > > cultures and religions. Their was the Roman culture, the Greek
          > > Culture, Egyptian Culture, Gaulish, Mesopotamian, and so forth.
          Each
          > > spreading within the Roma Republic and Empire without any
          > > discrimination or seclusion generally. The Mystery Religions are
          a
          > > interesting testament to this. Anyway, all of these cultures were
          > > accepted into the Roman Empire, despite having different cultures
          they
          > > were united under common reasons within the fabric of Rome
          itself. Of
          > > course, the Roman culture spread out as well and people did not
          > > exclude it.
          > > The Hellenist culture was the largest and strongest, as I
          mentioned
          > > beforem painting Roman culture as well.
          > >
          > > --- On *Thu, 1/22/09, phoenixfyre17 /<phoenixfyre17@...>/* wrote:
          > >
          > > From: phoenixfyre17 <phoenixfyre17@...>
          > > Subject: [Nova-Roma] Religio Hellenica?
          > > To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
          > > Date: Thursday, January 22, 2009, 9:12 PM
          > >
          > > Salvete omnes,
          > >
          > > Not to be rude or anything, but whats with the daily calendar
          > > postings
          > > being solely composed of Greek-related material? Last I knew,
          we are
          > > Nova *Roma* and worship the Gods of *Rome*, who are certainly
          not
          > > alternate names for Greek deities.
          > >
          > > The postings are interesting, but are quite off topic in my
          opinion.
          > >
          > > In Pax Deorum,
          > > Nero
          > >
          > >
          > >
          >
          Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60621 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2009-01-23
          Subject: Re: Religio Hellenica?
          Cato Liviae Plautae omnibusque in foro SPD

          Salve Livia et salvete omnes!

          I got a kick out the throwaway line "all that's left..." :)

          Just a reminder: during the two and a half years I did the calendar
          postings, I included a great deal of material from many cultures,
          trying to focus on the ancient world. The Romans would certainly
          know the stories of the Greek and Egyptian gods, just as a Christian
          in New York City cannot help but know when certain Jewish or Muslim
          holidays are taking place.

          If a Roman and a Greek were in a bar, and an Egyptian came up and
          asked, "Which one of the gods is the squinty hunch-backed one that
          was tossed out of the heavens, married the goddess of love, and
          makes the armor for the god of war?", the Greek would
          say, "Hephaeistos!" and the Roman would say, "Vulcan!"

          They would both be right.

          Vale et valete,

          Cato



          --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Lucia Livia Plauta" <cases@...>
          wrote:
          >
          > L. Livia Plauta "numero duobus" sal.
          [snip]

          > That said, I think the "greek" calendar posts are due to the fact
          > that Pontifex Maximus Piscinus has stopped posting, so all that's
          > left it Cato's calendar posts.
          > I hope Piscinus is all right.
          >
          > Optime vale,
          > Livia
          Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60622 From: M•IVL•SEVERVS Date: 2009-01-23
          Subject: EDICTVM CONSVLARE V - DE FERIAE SEMENTIVAE

          M. Curiatius Complutensis M. Iulius Severus consules: Senatui Populoque Novo Romano, Quiritibus et omnibus: salutem plurimam dicunt:

          Iubemus vos omnes bono animo esse!

          Ante diem VII Idus Februarias, populo Novo Romano Quiritibus feriae Sementivae erunt; quando concepta fuerint, dies nefastus esto.

          Consules edicunt, ut omnia sacella sacra aperiantur, supplicationesque pro =
          re publica populi Novi Romani Quiritium fiant.

          Datum est a. d. XI Kalendas Februarias, M. Curiatio Complutense M. Iulio Se=
          vero consulibus, anno MMDCCLXII AVC.

          The Consuls M. Curiatius Complutensis and M. Iulius Severus sends Salutations to the Conscript Fathers and Mothers of the Senate, to the People of Nova Roma, the Quirites, and to All others:

          We wish you to be of Good Cheer.

          On the seventh day of February (Gregorian; 24 January Julian), seven days before the Ides of February, the Roman people, the Quirites, will celebrate the feriae Sementivae (Paganalia); when they shall have begun, legal business ceases.

          The Consuls proclaim that on that day, all shrines are to be opened and thanksgivings offered for the Republic of the Nova Roman people, the Quirites.

          Issued in the Consulship of M. Curiatius Complutensis and M. Iulius Severus, 23 January 2009 CE


          Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60623 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2009-01-23
          Subject: a.d. X kal. Feb.
          Cato omnes in foro SPD

          Salvete omnes!

          Hodiernus dies est ante diem X kalendas Februarius; haec dies
          comitialis est.

          "I should state, however, that all those rites which he found
          established by Romulus, either in custom or in law, he left
          untouched, looking upon them all as established in the best
          possible manner. But whatever he thought had been overlooked by his
          predecessor, he added, consecrating many precincts to those gods who
          had hitherto received no honours, erecting many altars and temples,
          instituting festivals in honour of each, and appointing priests to
          have charge of their sanctuaries and rites, and enacting laws
          concerning purifications, ceremonies, expiations and many other
          observances and honours in greater number than are to be found in any
          other city, either Greek or barbarian, even in those that have prided
          themselves the most at one time or another upon their piety. He also
          ordered that Romulus himself, as one who had shown a greatness beyond
          mortal nature, should be honoured, under the name of Quirinus, by the
          erection of a temple and by sacrifices throughout the year.

          For while the Romans were yet in doubt whether divine providence or
          human treachery had been the cause of his disappearance, a certain
          man, named Iulius, descended from Ascanius, who was a husbandman and
          of such a blameless life that he would never have told an untruth
          for his private advantage, arrived in the Forum and said that, as he
          was coming in from the country, he saw Romulus departing from the
          city fully armed and that, as he drew near to him, he heard him say
          these words: 'Iulius, announce to the Romans from me, that the
          genius to whom I was allotted at my birth is conducting me to the
          gods, now that I have finished my mortal life, and that I am
          Quirinus.'

          Numa, having reduced his whole system of religious laws to writing,
          divided them into eight parts, that being the number of the
          different classes of religious ceremonies." - Dionysius of
          Halicarnassus, "Roman Antiquities" 2.63


          "Then she [Sekhmet] laughed with joy, and her laughter was like the
          roar of a lioness hungry for the kill. Thinking that it was indeed
          blood, she stooped and drank. Again and yet again she drank, laughing
          with delight; and the strength of the beer mounted to her brain, so
          that she could no longer slay. At last she came reeling back to where
          Ra was waiting; that day she had not killed even a single man. Then
          Ra said: 'You come in peace, sweet one.' And her name was changed to
          Hathor, and her nature was changed also to the sweetness of love and
          the strength of desire. And henceforth Hathor laid low men and women
          only with the great power of love. But for ever after her priestesses
          drank in her honour of the beer of Heliopolis coloured with the red
          ochre of Elephantine when they celebrated her festival each New
          Year." - from the Egyptian Book of The Dead

          "The beauty of your face
          Glitters when you rise
          Oh come in peace.
          One is drunk
          At your beautiful face,
          O Gold, Hathor." - 18th Dynasty Hymn to Hathor

          In ancient Egypt, today was celebrated in honor of the goddess
          Hathor. Hathor was originally a goddess of destruction, as
          Sekhmet; she was so violent and intent on the slaughter of human
          beings that Ra had to figure a way of making her stop before mankind
          was utterly destroyed. He poured enormous quantities of red-colored
          beer across the fertile Nile delta; Sekhmet, thinking it was human
          blood, drank it and became docile (i.e., drunk). She then became a
          gentle and loving mother-goddess symbolized by the cow. Hathor was
          associated with erotic music and dancing, patron of sexual love, the
          sky, the sun, the queen, music, dance and the arts, and the
          Egyptian's cognate of the Romans' Venus, while the Greeks identified
          her with Aphrodite. Egyptian women prayed to Hathor for assistance
          during childbirth (as the Romans did to Iuno Licina), and as a cow
          deity she was envisioned as suckling infants. She was often depicted
          as a woman with the sun-disc between two cow's horns.


          Valete bene!

          Cato
          Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60624 From: M•IVL•SEVERVS Date: 2009-01-23
          Subject: EDICTVM CONSVLARE V - DE FERIAE SEMENTIVAE

          M. Curiatius Complutensis M. Iulius Severus consules: Senatui Populoque Novo Romano, Quiritibus et omnibus: salutem plurimam dicunt:

          Iubemus vos omnes bono animo esse!

          Ante diem VII Idus Februarias, populo Novo Romano Quiritibus feriae Sementivae erunt; quando concepta fuerint, dies nefastus esto.

          Consules edicunt, ut omnia sacella sacra aperiantur, supplicationesque pro re publica populi Novi Romani Quiritium fiant.

          Datum est a. d. XI Kalendas Februarias, M. Curiatio Complutense M. Iulio Severo consulibus, anno MMDCCLXII AVC.

           

          Los Cónsules M. Curiatius Complutensis y M. Iulius Severus saludan a las Madres y a los Padres Conscriptos del Senado, al Pueblo de Nova Ropma, los Quirites, y a todos los demás:

          Les deseamos alegría y felicidad.

          El séptimo día de febrero (calendario gregoriano; 24 de enero, calendario juliano), siete días antes de los Idus de febrero, el Pueblo romano, los Quirites, celebrarán las feriae Seámentivae (Paganalia); en cuanto comiencen, todos los asuntos legales dejarán de ser tramitados.

          Los Cónsules proclaman que ese día, todos los santuarios serán abiertos y se ofrecerán acciones de gracias por la República del Pueblo de Nova Roma, los Quirites.

          Dado en el Consulado de M. Curiatius Complutensis y M. Iulius Severus, 23 de enero de 2009 d.n.e.

          Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60625 From: Lucia Livia Plauta Date: 2009-01-23
          Subject: Re: Religio Hellenica?
          Salve Cato,
          >
          > I got a kick out the throwaway line "all that's left..." :)
          >
          Sorry, I think it's no secret that I like Piscinus' posts more than
          yours.

          >
          > If a Roman and a Greek were in a bar, and an Egyptian came up and
          > asked, "Which one of the gods is the squinty hunch-backed one that
          > was tossed out of the heavens, married the goddess of love, and
          > makes the armor for the god of war?", the Greek would
          > say, "Hephaeistos!" and the Roman would say, "Vulcan!"
          >
          > They would both be right.
          >
          I totally agree with you on this, but the same is true in present
          times. That's why I find your posts not too informative.
          Piscinus' posts mostly concentrate on the differences, on what makes
          the roman religion roman, on the little titbits that not everybody
          knows (plus the historical and battle descriptions, which I often
          skip, but I'm sure find a lot of appreciation among men).

          Optime vale,
          Livia
          Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60626 From: Complutensis Date: 2009-01-23
          Subject: EDICTUM CONSULARE VI: De creatione accensi
          EDICTUM CONSULARE VI: De creatione accensi

          By this edict, we the consuls both appoint citizen:

          Ti. Horatius Barbatus as accensus of joint Consular Cohort together with all the obligations and privileges prescribed by the laws of Nova Roma.

          No oath shall be required. This edict takes effect immediately.

          Given under our hands this 23 day of January 2762 a.U.c (AD 2009) in the consulships of M. Curiatius and M. Iulius.


          Por este edicto, nosotros los consules, nombramos a los siguientes ciudadanos:

          • Ti. Horatius Barbatus

          accensus de nuestra Cohorte Consular.

          No se requiere juramento. Este edicto será efectivo inmediatamente.

          Dado por nuestras manos en este 23 dia de Enero de 2762 a.U.c (AD 2009) en el consulado de M. Curiatius and M. Iulius.


          Per questo editto, noi i consoli, nominiamo i seguenti cittadini:

          • Ti. Horatius Barbatus accensus della nostra Cohorte Consolare.

          Non é richiesto giuramento. Questo editto sará efettivo inmediatamente.

          Dato il giorno 23 di Gennaio 2762 a.U.c (AD 2009) nel consulato di M. Curiatius and M. Iulius.


          M. Curiatius Complutensis

          M. Iulius Severus

          Se certificó que el correo saliente no contiene virus.
          Comprobada por AVG - http://www.avg.es
          Versión: 8.0.176 / Base de datos de virus: 270.10.12/1911 - Fecha de la versión: 23/01/2009 7:28

          Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60627 From: Numero 2 Date: 2009-01-23
          Subject: Re: Religio Hellenica?
          i thought that my name was on the mail, i didn't know why not.
          I'm Sempronia Solaria Messalina. But i don't understand why don't you
          ask just "sorry, but there isn't your name on the message, could you
          tell us who you are?".
          Too difficult. It's better as you did. Ok, i'll remember it for the future.

          If you think that roman and greek religions are "the same", free to do it.
          But please, explain who is the same of Janus in greek religion.
          Demonstrateb that the ritual were the same.

          I repeat what i said: culture (art philosophy, licteracture, ecc) is not
          religion.
          The greek influence is mostly on culture. About the religion you can
          remind me the rite to Saturnus, but in Saturnalia (the book) is
          specified that was with greek ceremony and not roman.
          If they are the same, why this difference?
          And if they are the same, why Janus is only roman in Fasti (Ovidio)?
          And Mars Quirinus is not ares, but there is a typology of Mars similar
          to an aspect of Ares.

          For the "roman" name... i have two. My real name and the nova roman one.
          Which one do you want?

          Vale

          Sempronia Solaria Messalina (is it enough?)


          ___________________________________

          Lucia Livia Plauta ha scritto:
          >
          > L. Livia Plauta "numero duobus" sal.
          >
          > Who are you, numero 2? Do I know you from the Pomerium list?
          > It would be nice if everyone who posts would sign their posts with
          > their roman name, specially if it's not identifiable by the Yahoo
          > account name.
          >
          > That said, I think the "greek" calendar posts are due to the fact
          > that Pontifex Maximus Piscinus has stopped posting, so all that's
          > left it Cato's calendar posts.
          > I hope Piscinus is all right.
          >
          > Optime vale,
          > Livia
          >
          Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60628 From: Lucia Livia Plauta Date: 2009-01-23
          Subject: Re: Religio Hellenica?
          Salve Messalina,
          >
          > i thought that my name was on the mail, i didn't know why not.
          > I'm Sempronia Solaria Messalina. But i don't understand why don't
          you
          > ask just "sorry, but there isn't your name on the message, could
          you
          > tell us who you are?".
          > Too difficult. It's better as you did. Ok, i'll remember it for the
          future.

          Non è solo a te che mi rivolgevo.
          >
          > If you think that roman and greek religions are "the same", free to
          do it.
          > But please, explain who is the same of Janus in greek religion.
          > Demonstrateb that the ritual were the same.
          >
          Erano altri che lo dicevano, non io. L'argomento comunque è
          complicato e non ho voglia di occuparmene adesso.

          > Sempronia Solaria Messalina (is it enough?)
          >
          Mi basta questo. Il mio vero nome comunque è incluso in quello
          romano. Ma come mai continuano a venire fuori dei Solarii italiani
          che io non ho mai visto nella lista italiana? Non sarai anche tu di
          Bologna?

          Optime vale,
          Livia

          >
          > ___________________________________
          >
          > Lucia Livia Plauta ha scritto:
          > >
          > > L. Livia Plauta "numero duobus" sal.
          > >
          > > Who are you, numero 2? Do I know you from the Pomerium list?
          > > It would be nice if everyone who posts would sign their posts with
          > > their roman name, specially if it's not identifiable by the Yahoo
          > > account name.
          > >
          > > That said, I think the "greek" calendar posts are due to the fact
          > > that Pontifex Maximus Piscinus has stopped posting, so all that's
          > > left it Cato's calendar posts.
          > > I hope Piscinus is all right.
          > >
          > > Optime vale,
          > > Livia
          > >
          >
          Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60629 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2009-01-23
          Subject: Re: Religio Hellenica?
          Cato Liviae Plautae omnibusque in foro SPD

          Salve et salvete!

          Livia Plauta, I didn't think you weren't being mean or anything so
          it's cool, just thought it was funny :)

          Anyway, I've always loved the stories about the gods and heroes and
          was just sort of filling in time because Piscinus hadn't posted. If
          nothing else, when I post you'll get the date. You can always just
          skip over the rest...

          Vale et valete!

          Cato
          Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60630 From: yoshiyuki hiramoto Date: 2009-01-23
          Subject: Re: Transition of Roman History
          --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "philippe cardon"
          <philippe.cardon01@...> wrote:
          >
          > Right or wrong, all people seek for a chief
          > that the first reason of the end of the republic
          > second: the hellenistic ideology of the King-savior, of the chief
          leaded by Tyche who must be worshipped as a god
          > thrid the incapacity of republics in antiquity to create a house
          of representatives
          > direct democraty was possible only in little state
          > in rome, most of the citizens lived too far to come to comicia nd
          take part in politics
          > Varro


          Hi Varro,

          You are right. As you described , the citizens who lived in
          other placed than Italy were too far to come to join the meeting of
          senators in Rome at that time. And Caeser tried to convice that
          to senators at that time , but they misunderstood Caeser's intention
          to solve the problem by constructing new system , which is Empier,
          then they killed him because they thought Caeser liked to become
          Dictator and got worse for Roman Republic.
          However, Antonius and later Augustinus inherited Caeser's
          intention to change Roman Republic to Roman Empier as the best
          way to manage in politics.

          Eddie
          > ----- Original Message -----
          > From: QFabiusMaxmi@...
          > To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
          > Sent: Friday, January 23, 2009 12:21 PM
          > Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: Transition of Roman History
          >
          >
          >
          > In a message dated 1/21/2009 6:45:56 P.M. Pacific Standard Time,
          jagf1@... writes:
          > I believe that Caesar was trying from its Populare point of
          view to look for the required design changes, which he thought that
          some of it had to be done with the powers of dictator (a legal
          position within the system). There is some credibility to this point
          although he did not explicitly said so.
          > And I believe you don't have the evidence to back up such a
          claim. Or do you believe that "First Man of Rome" is Roman History?
          >
          > Q. Fabius Maximus
          >
          >
          > -------------------------------------------------------------------
          -----------
          > From Wall Street to Main Street and everywhere in between, stay
          up-to-date with the latest news.
          >
          >
          >
          > -----------------------------------------------------------------
          ----------------------
          > Orange vous informe que cet e-mail a $BqU!&(Bcontr$B‡M!&(Bpar l'anti-
          virus mail.
          > Aucun virus connu $B!&(Bce jour par nos services n'a $BqU!&(Bd$BqU(Bect$B!&(B
          >
          Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60631 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2009-01-23
          Subject: Re: Religio Hellenica?
          C. Equitius Cato Semproniae Solariae Messalinae sal.

          Solaria Messalina, I don't think the assertion is that the Greek and
          Roman religions were the same, but that the Romans took the vast
          majority of the attributes and designations of their gods from the
          Greeks, simply changing their names (in most cases). The stories of
          the gods and heroes are basically the same and there is nothing wrong
          with that; the Romans were singularly adept at molding foreign ideas
          of all sorts into useful tools for the benefit of Roman society, and
          they weren't embarrassed to examine them or talk about them. Ovid,
          for example, speaks repeatedly in the "Fasti" of various
          interpretations of place-names and the meanings behind different
          rituals, anmd even when he dismisses a belief as unlikely, it is not
          with disdain or condescension, but more a feeling of "well, some
          people think it's this, but it's probably more like this..."


          The actual *mechanics* of worship, the bits about who stands where and
          says what when were probably different, although history shows that
          humans are always adapting things they have already seen or heard -
          consciously or unconsciously.

          Vale bene,

          Cato
          Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60632 From: C. Maria Caeca Date: 2009-01-23
          Subject: Re: Religio Hellenica?
          Salvete Omnes, et Salve Cato,

          Cato, I have enjoyed your calendar postings for a very long time, and,
          frankly, I had rather figured that the 2 postings were in concert, as they
          emphasized different, but mutually interesting, things. While the Religio
          Romana is not the same as, or a clone of, the religion of ancient Greece,
          the Greek culture, including it's extensive body of religious legend, its
          history and its literature were inextricably wound with the Roman culture.
          Not only do I find this material very interesting, but I also think (for
          whatever that's worth) that it is appropriate here.

          Valete et Vale,
          C. Maria Caeca
          Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60633 From: Ellen Catalina Date: 2009-01-23
          Subject: Re: EDICTVM CONSVLARE V - DE FERIAE SEMENTIVAE
          How does one properly celebrate paganalia?

          --- On Fri, 1/23/09, M•IVL•SEVERVS <marcusiuliusseverus@...> wrote:
          From: M•IVL•SEVERVS <marcusiuliusseverus@...>
          Subject: [Nova-Roma] EDICTVM CONSVLARE V - DE FERIAE SEMENTIVAE
          To: "Nova Roma" <nova-roma@yahoogroups.com>, nrprovinciamexico@yahoogroups.com, "Nova Roma Announce" <novaroma-announce@yahoogroups.com>
          Date: Friday, January 23, 2009, 12:50 PM

          M. Curiatius Complutensis M. Iulius Severus consules: Senatui Populoque Novo Romano, Quiritibus et omnibus: salutem plurimam dicunt:

          Iubemus vos omnes bono animo esse!

          Ante diem VII Idus Februarias, populo Novo Romano Quiritibus feriae Sementivae erunt; quando concepta fuerint, dies nefastus esto.

          Consules edicunt, ut omnia sacella sacra aperiantur, supplicationesque pro re publica populi Novi Romani Quiritium fiant.

          Datum est a. d. XI Kalendas Februarias, M. Curiatio Complutense M. Iulio Severo consulibus, anno MMDCCLXII AVC.

           

          Los Cónsules M. Curiatius Complutensis y M. Iulius Severus saludan a las Madres y a los Padres Conscriptos del Senado, al Pueblo de Nova Ropma, los Quirites, y a todos los demás:

          Les deseamos alegría y felicidad.

          El séptimo día de febrero (calendario gregoriano; 24 de enero, calendario juliano), siete días antes de los Idus de febrero, el Pueblo romano, los Quirites, celebrarán las feriae Seámentivae (Paganalia); en cuanto comiencen, todos los asuntos legales dejarán de ser tramitados.

          Los Cónsules proclaman que ese día, todos los santuarios serán abiertos y se ofrecerán acciones de gracias por la República del Pueblo de Nova Roma, los Quirites.

          Dado en el Consulado de M. Curiatius Complutensis y M. Iulius Severus, 23 de enero de 2009 d.n.e.