Selected messages in Nova-Roma group. Feb 1-9, 2009

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60845 From: Gnaeus Iulius Caesar Date: 2009-02-01
Subject: Re: de Romanis
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60846 From: Gaius Petronius Dexter Date: 2009-02-01
Subject: Re: de Romanis
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60847 From: Gaius Petronius Dexter Date: 2009-02-01
Subject: Re: Edictum de Creatione Scribae
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60848 From: marcushoratius Date: 2009-02-01
Subject: KALNDAE FEBRUARIAE: Juno Februa, Juno Sospita, Vesta, and Jupiter To
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60849 From: rexantartida Date: 2009-02-01
Subject: I'm a new Roman citizen
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60850 From: Publius Memmius Albucius Date: 2009-02-01
Subject: Circulum Latin. Lutetiae
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60851 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2009-02-01
Subject: Re: I'm a new Roman citizen
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60852 From: Amelie Zapf Date: 2009-02-01
Subject: Re: de Romanis
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60853 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2009-02-01
Subject: Re: de Romanis
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60854 From: Albert Galceran Vidal Date: 2009-02-01
Subject: Re: I'm a new Roman citizen
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60855 From: Metrobius Date: 2009-02-01
Subject: Re: Newbie Questions Re: de Romanis
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60856 From: Kristoffer From Date: 2009-02-01
Subject: Re: Newbie Questions
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60857 From: Metrobius Date: 2009-02-01
Subject: Re: Newbie Questions
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60858 From: Amelie Zapf Date: 2009-02-01
Subject: Re: de Romanis
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60859 From: mwaldenberger Date: 2009-02-01
Subject: Re: de Romanis
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60860 From: Steve Moore Date: 2009-02-01
Subject: Latin for E-mail
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60861 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2009-02-01
Subject: Re: Latin for E-mail
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60862 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2009-02-01
Subject: Re: Newbie Questions Re: de Romanis
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60863 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2009-02-01
Subject: Re: de Romanis
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60864 From: Metrobius Date: 2009-02-01
Subject: Re: Newbie Questions Re: de Romanis
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60865 From: Metrobius Date: 2009-02-01
Subject: Re: de Romanis
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60866 From: Lucia Livia Plauta Date: 2009-02-01
Subject: Re: de Romanis
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60867 From: Q. Caecilius Metellus Date: 2009-02-01
Subject: Re: de Romanis
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60868 From: Albert Galceran Vidal Date: 2009-02-01
Subject: Re: Newbie Questions Re: de Romanis
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60869 From: Q. Caecilius Metellus Date: 2009-02-01
Subject: Kalendis Februariis Iunoni
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60870 From: Q. Valerius Poplicola Date: 2009-02-01
Subject: Re: de Romanis
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60871 From: Maior Date: 2009-02-01
Subject: Re: Circulum Latin. Lutetiae
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60872 From: Q. Valerius Poplicola Date: 2009-02-01
Subject: Magna Mater
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60873 From: MCC Date: 2009-02-02
Subject: EDICTUM CONSULARE DE TABULA PRETIORUM VECTIGALIUM NOVAE ROMAE ANNO 2
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60874 From: MCC Date: 2009-02-02
Subject: EDICTUM CONSULARE DE TABULA PRETIORUM VECTIGALIUM NOVAE ROMAE ANNO 2
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60875 From: MCC Date: 2009-02-02
Subject: EDICTUM CONSULARE DE TABULA PRETIORUM VECTIGALIUM NOVAE ROMAE ANNO 2
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60876 From: titus.aquila Date: 2009-02-02
Subject: EDICTUM CONSULARE DE TABULA PRETIORUM VECTIGALIUM NOVAE ROMAE ANNO 2
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60877 From: marcushoratius Date: 2009-02-02
Subject: a. d. IV Nonas Februarias: Clodius begins prosecuting Milo
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60878 From: rexantartida Date: 2009-02-02
Subject: Hay un manual para rito romano?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60879 From: MCC Date: 2009-02-02
Subject: Re: Hay un manual para rito romano?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60880 From: gaiuspopilliuslaenas Date: 2009-02-02
Subject: EDICTVM CENSORIVM DE SCRIBIS PROROGANDIS
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60881 From: Tiberius Horatius Barbatus Date: 2009-02-02
Subject: MITHRACON XII IS COMING
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60882 From: D. Aemilus Severus Date: 2009-02-02
Subject: Re: EDICTUM CONSULARE DE TABULA PRETIORUM VECTIGALIUM NOVAE ROMAE AN
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60883 From: Publius Memmius Albucius Date: 2009-02-02
Subject: Re: Circulum Latin. Lutetiae
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60884 From: Maior Date: 2009-02-02
Subject: Re: Circulum Latin. Lutetiae
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60885 From: Maxima Valeria Messallina Date: 2009-02-03
Subject: Re: de Romanis
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60886 From: Maxima Valeria Messallina Date: 2009-02-03
Subject: Re: de Romanis
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60887 From: Maxima Valeria Messallina Date: 2009-02-03
Subject: Re: de Romanis
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60888 From: Maxima Valeria Messallina Date: 2009-02-03
Subject: Re: de Romanis
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60889 From: Maxima Valeria Messallina Date: 2009-02-03
Subject: Re: de Romanis
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60890 From: Gaius Petronius Dexter Date: 2009-02-03
Subject: Re: Circulum Latin. Lutetiae
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60891 From: Maxima Valeria Messallina Date: 2009-02-03
Subject: Re: de Romanis
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60892 From: MCC Date: 2009-02-03
Subject: Re: EDICTUM CONSULARE DE TABULA PRETIORUM VECTIGALIUM NOVAE ROMAE AN
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60893 From: M. Lucretius Agricola Date: 2009-02-03
Subject: Re: Circulum Latin. Lutetiae
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60894 From: Gaius Petronius Dexter Date: 2009-02-03
Subject: Re: EDICTUM CONSULARE DE TABULA PRETIORUM VECTIGALIUM NOVAE ROMAE AN
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60895 From: Cn. Cornelius Lentulus Date: 2009-02-03
Subject: R: [Nova-Roma] Re: EDICTUM CONSULARE DE TABULA PRETIORUM VECTIGALIUM
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60896 From: Cn. Cornelius Lentulus Date: 2009-02-03
Subject: Re: Circulum Latin. Lutetiae
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60897 From: Cn. Cornelius Lentulus Date: 2009-02-03
Subject: Re: de Romanis
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60898 From: MCC Date: 2009-02-03
Subject: EDICTO CONSULAR HISPANIAE LV (Complutensis XXX) SOBRE IMPUESTOS ANUA
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60899 From: Gaius Marcius Crispus Date: 2009-02-03
Subject: Re: Magna Mater
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60900 From: Gnaeus Iulius Caesar Date: 2009-02-03
Subject: CURULE AEDILE EDICT 62-07: APPOINTMENT OF SCRIBAE AND DISMISSAL OF S
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60901 From: marcushoratius Date: 2009-02-03
Subject: a. d. III Nonas Februarias: Purity of mind and ethical conduct
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60902 From: PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@aol.com Date: 2009-02-03
Subject: Re: Religio Hellenica versus Pax et Salus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60903 From: PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@aol.com Date: 2009-02-03
Subject: Re: SOCIAL REFORM AND TWO-TIER TAXATION SYSTEM
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60904 From: Cocceius Spinula Date: 2009-02-03
Subject: ÉDITO CONSULAR HISPANIAE LV (Complutensis XXX) SOBRE OS IMPOSTOS AN
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60905 From: Charlie Collins Date: 2009-02-03
Subject: Latin Dictionary for Mac users
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60906 From: Maior Date: 2009-02-03
Subject: Re: Circulum Latin. Lutetiae
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60907 From: marcushoratius Date: 2009-02-04
Subject: Pridie Nonas Februarias: Funeral of Pertinax, Death of Severus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60908 From: aerdensrw Date: 2009-02-04
Subject: Re: EDICTUM CONSULARE DE TABULA PRETIORUM VECTIGALIUM NOVAE ROMAE AN
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60909 From: aerdensrw Date: 2009-02-04
Subject: Re: SOCIAL REFORM AND TWO-TIER TAXATION SYSTEM
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60910 From: Gnaeus Caelius Ahenobarbus Date: 2009-02-04
Subject: Re: SOCIAL REFORM AND TWO-TIER TAXATION SYSTEM
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60911 From: Gaius Petronius Dexter Date: 2009-02-04
Subject: Re: Circulum Latin. Lutetiae
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60912 From: Gnaeus Iulius Caesar Date: 2009-02-04
Subject: Re: EDICTUM CONSULARE DE TABULA PRETIORUM VECTIGALIUM NOVAE ROMAE AN
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60913 From: Gaius Petronius Dexter Date: 2009-02-05
Subject: Re: Circulum Latin. Lutetiae
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60914 From: Q. Ovidius Sabinus Date: 2009-02-05
Subject: Re: EDICTUM CONSULARE DE TABULA PRETIORUM VECTIGALIUM NOVAE ROMAE AN
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60915 From: MCC Date: 2009-02-05
Subject: Re: EDICTUM CONSULARE DE TABULA PRETIORUM VECTIGALIUM NOVAE ROMAE AN
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60916 From: QFabiusMaxmi@aol.com Date: 2009-02-05
Subject: Re: SOCIAL REFORM AND TWO-TIER TAXATION SYSTEM
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60917 From: marcushoratius Date: 2009-02-05
Subject: NONAE FEBRUARIAE: Concordia
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60918 From: Cn. Cornelius Lentulus Date: 2009-02-05
Subject: Concordia Ritual on the Day of the Temple of Concordia
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60919 From: Rich Date: 2009-02-06
Subject: Curious non-member with some questions.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60920 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2009-02-06
Subject: Re: Curious non-member with some questions.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60921 From: Rich Date: 2009-02-06
Subject: Re: Curious non-member with some questions.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60922 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2009-02-06
Subject: Re: Curious non-member with some questions.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60923 From: Titus Annaeus Regulus Date: 2009-02-06
Subject: Re: Curious non-member with some questions.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60924 From: Rich Date: 2009-02-06
Subject: Re: Curious non-member with some questions.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60925 From: Rich Date: 2009-02-06
Subject: Re: Curious non-member with some questions.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60926 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2009-02-07
Subject: Re: Curious non-member with some questions.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60927 From: Rich Date: 2009-02-07
Subject: Re: Curious non-member with some questions.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60928 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2009-02-07
Subject: Re: Curious non-member with some questions.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60929 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2009-02-07
Subject: Re: Curious non-member with some questions.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60930 From: marcushoratius Date: 2009-02-07
Subject: a. d. VII Eidus Februariae: The Trial of Milo
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60931 From: Rich Date: 2009-02-07
Subject: Re: Curious non-member with some questions.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60932 From: Publia Aemilia Scaeva Date: 2009-02-07
Subject: OT to ATS: did this work? was: Re: [Nova-Roma] Curious non-member wi
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60933 From: Maior Date: 2009-02-07
Subject: Re: Curious non-member with some questions.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60934 From: D. Aemilus Severus Date: 2009-02-07
Subject: Re: Curious non-member with some questions.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60935 From: Maior Date: 2009-02-07
Subject: Re: Curious non-member with some questions.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60936 From: Titus Annaeus Regulus Date: 2009-02-07
Subject: Re: Curious non-member with some questions.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60937 From: Rich Date: 2009-02-07
Subject: Re: Curious non-member with some questions.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60938 From: Maior Date: 2009-02-07
Subject: Re: Curious non-member with some questions.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60939 From: Rich Date: 2009-02-07
Subject: Re: Curious non-member with some questions.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60940 From: Steve Moore Date: 2009-02-07
Subject: Re: Curious non-member with some questions.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60941 From: Titus Annaeus Regulus Date: 2009-02-07
Subject: Re: Curious non-member with some questions.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60942 From: Maior Date: 2009-02-07
Subject: Re: Curious non-member with some questions.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60943 From: Rich Date: 2009-02-07
Subject: Re: Curious non-member with some questions.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60944 From: Maior Date: 2009-02-07
Subject: Re: Curious non-member with some questions.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60945 From: Rich Date: 2009-02-07
Subject: Re: Curious non-member with some questions.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60946 From: Maior Date: 2009-02-07
Subject: Re: Curious non-member with some questions.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60947 From: Titus Annaeus Regulus Date: 2009-02-07
Subject: Regulus & Maior Conversation was [ Re: Curious non-member with some
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60948 From: Maior Date: 2009-02-07
Subject: Bona Dea and Roman culture [Regulus & Maior Conversation]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60949 From: t.ovidius_aquila Date: 2009-02-08
Subject: Re: Curious non-member with some questions.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60950 From: Rich Date: 2009-02-08
Subject: Re: Curious non-member with some questions.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60951 From: Annia Minucia Marcella Date: 2009-02-08
Subject: Re: Curious non-member with some questions.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60952 From: Stefn Ullerius Venator Piperbarbus Date: 2009-02-08
Subject: Rich's original questions, was Re: Curious non-member with some ques
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60953 From: Rich Date: 2009-02-08
Subject: Re: Curious non-member with some questions.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60954 From: Annia Minucia Marcella Date: 2009-02-08
Subject: Re: Curious non-member with some questions.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60955 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2009-02-08
Subject: Re: OT to ATS: did this work? was: Re: [Nova-Roma] Curious non-membe
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60956 From: Metrobius Date: 2009-02-08
Subject: Re: Regulus & Maior Conversation was [ Re: Curious non-member with s
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60957 From: belovedmetrobius Date: 2009-02-08
Subject: Clodius Pulcher was RE: Curious non-member with some questions.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60958 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2009-02-08
Subject: Regulus & Maior Conversation was [ Re: Curious non-member with some
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60959 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2009-02-08
Subject: Re: Curious non-member with some questions.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60960 From: Rich Date: 2009-02-08
Subject: Re: Curious non-member with some questions.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60961 From: Metrobius Date: 2009-02-08
Subject: Re: Regulus & Maior Conversation was [ Re: Curious non-member with s
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60962 From: Metrobius Date: 2009-02-08
Subject: Re: Curious non-member with some questions.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60963 From: Metrobius Date: 2009-02-08
Subject: Re: Curious non-member with some questions.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60964 From: marcushoratius Date: 2009-02-08
Subject: a. d. VI Eidus Februariae: Februa; dies natalis Quirini
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60965 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2009-02-08
Subject: A reminder from the praetor
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60966 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2009-02-08
Subject: Re: Curious non-member with some questions.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60967 From: Annia Minucia Marcella Date: 2009-02-08
Subject: Re: Curious non-member with some questions.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60968 From: Metrobius Date: 2009-02-08
Subject: Re: Being Roman was RE: Curious non-member with some questions.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60969 From: Rich Date: 2009-02-08
Subject: Re: A reminder from the praetor
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60970 From: Rich Date: 2009-02-08
Subject: Re: Curious non-member with some questions.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60971 From: Rich Date: 2009-02-08
Subject: Re: Rich's original questions, was Re: Curious non-member with some
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60972 From: Maior Date: 2009-02-08
Subject: Re: A reminder from the praetor
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60973 From: Titus Annaeus Regulus Date: 2009-02-08
Subject: Re: Bona Dea and Roman culture [Regulus & Maior Conversation]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60974 From: Titus Annaeus Regulus Date: 2009-02-08
Subject: Re: Regulus & Maior Conversation was [ Re: Curious non-member with s
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60975 From: nate kingery Date: 2009-02-08
Subject: Re: Curious non-member with some questions.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60976 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2009-02-08
Subject: Re: A reminder from the praetor
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60977 From: philippe cardon Date: 2009-02-08
Subject: Re: Regulus & Maior Conversation was [ Re: Curious non-member with s
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60978 From: Rich Date: 2009-02-08
Subject: Re: A reminder from the praetor
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60979 From: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com Date: 2009-02-08
Subject: File - language.txt
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60980 From: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com Date: 2009-02-08
Subject: File - EDICTUM DE SERMONE
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60981 From: Stefn Ullerius Venator Piperbarbus Date: 2009-02-08
Subject: Re: Rich's original questions, was Re: Curious non-member with some
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60982 From: Lucia Livia Plauta Date: 2009-02-08
Subject: Regulus & Maior Conversation was [ Re: Curious non-member with some
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60983 From: Gallagher Date: 2009-02-08
Subject: Crusades question and NOT the start of a flame war
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60984 From: Lucia Livia Plauta Date: 2009-02-08
Subject: Regulus & Maior Conversation was [ Re: Curious non-member with some
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60985 From: Annia Minucia Marcella Date: 2009-02-08
Subject: Re: Crusades question and NOT the start of a flame war
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60986 From: Ellen Catalina Date: 2009-02-08
Subject: Re: Regulus & Maior Conversation was [ Re: Curious non-member with s
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60987 From: Maior Date: 2009-02-08
Subject: Regulus & Maior Conversation was [ Re: Curious non-member with some
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60988 From: ellencatalina Date: 2009-02-08
Subject: Another curious non-member with questions
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60989 From: Ellen Catalina Date: 2009-02-08
Subject: Re: Regulus & Maior Conversation was [ Re: Curious non-member with s
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60990 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2009-02-09
Subject: Re: Another curious non-member with questions
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60991 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2009-02-09
Subject: Regulus & Maior Conversation was [ Re: Curious non-member with some
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60992 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2009-02-09
Subject: Regulus & Maior Conversation was [ Re: Curious non-member with some
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60993 From: philippe cardon Date: 2009-02-09
Subject: Re: Regulus & Maior Conversation was [ Re: Curious non-member with s
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60995 From: Metrobius Date: 2009-02-09
Subject: Re: A reminder from the praetor
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60996 From: Cn. Cornelius Lentulus Date: 2009-02-09
Subject: R: [Nova-Roma] Another curious non-member with questions
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60997 From: marcushoratius Date: 2009-02-09
Subject: a. d. V Eidus Februariae: Cato opposes Pompeius Magnus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60998 From: segestamilius Date: 2009-02-09
Subject: Re: Crusades question and NOT the start of a flame war
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60999 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2009-02-09
Subject: Fwd: Salvete, Roma aeterna vobis salutem dicit .
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 61000 From: Chantal Gaudiano Date: 2009-02-09
Subject: (no subject)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 61001 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2009-02-09
Subject: Regulus & Maior Conversation was [ Re: Curious non-member with some
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 61002 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2009-02-09
Subject: a.d. V kal. Feb. - Apollo
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 61003 From: Q. Caecilius Metellus Date: 2009-02-09
Subject: Re: de Lentulo
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 61004 From: Lucia Livia Plauta Date: 2009-02-09
Subject: Regulus & Maior Conversation was [ Re: Curious non-member with some
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 61005 From: Lucia Livia Plauta Date: 2009-02-09
Subject: Regulus & Maior Conversation was [ Re: Curious non-member with some
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 61006 From: Gnaeus Caelius Ahenobarbus Date: 2009-02-09
Subject: Regulus & Maior Conversation was [ Re: Curious non-member with some
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 61007 From: Maior Date: 2009-02-09
Subject: Regulus & Maior Conversation was [ Re: Curious non-member with some
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 61008 From: Maior Date: 2009-02-09
Subject: Re: de Lentulo
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 61009 From: philippe cardon Date: 2009-02-09
Subject: Re: some OT thoughts was regulus and maioir conversation
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 61010 From: QFabiusMaxmi@aol.com Date: 2009-02-09
Subject: Re: Crusades question and NOT the start of a flame war
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 61011 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2009-02-09
Subject: Regulus & Maior Conversation was [ Re: Curious non-member with some
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 61012 From: fauxrari Date: 2009-02-09
Subject: Looking for info about Roman weddings
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 61013 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2009-02-09
Subject: Re: some OT thoughts was regulus and maioir conversation
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 61014 From: philippe cardon Date: 2009-02-09
Subject: Re: some OT thoughts was regulus and maioir conversation
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 61015 From: QFabiusMaxmi@aol.com Date: 2009-02-09
Subject: Re: Regulus & Maior Conversation was [ Re: Curious non-member wit...
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 61016 From: Maior Date: 2009-02-09
Subject: Re: some OT thoughts was regulus and maioir conversation
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 61017 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2009-02-09
Subject: Regulus & Maior Conversation was [ Re: Curious non-member wit...
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 61018 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2009-02-09
Subject: Re: some OT thoughts was regulus and maioir conversation
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 61019 From: Titus Annaeus Regulus Date: 2009-02-09
Subject: Re: Crusades question and NOT the start of a flame war
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 61020 From: Titus Annaeus Regulus Date: 2009-02-09
Subject: Re: Regulus & Maior Conversation was [ Re: Curious non-member with s
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 61021 From: Titus Annaeus Regulus Date: 2009-02-09
Subject: Re: Crusades question and NOT the start of a flame war



Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60845 From: Gnaeus Iulius Caesar Date: 2009-02-01
Subject: Re: de Romanis
Salve Messallina.
 
I have to say anything other than the current policy on minors makes me very uneasy. I see the merit in your proposal, but I am still left with the feeling that this is one policy best left as it is.
 
Vale bene
Cn. Iulius Caesar

Sent: Saturday, January 31, 2009 9:39 PM
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: de Romanis

Salvete,
 
Well, we could have a separate list for minors only, say from ages 12 to 17. They would not be members, but they could get information from us about ancient Rome and all things roman. That way we fan the flame would out letting the fire consumed us, i.e., keep them interested until they are of age to join us and not be accused of "adopting" them or recruiting them. We simply allow them a place to come and ask their questions. We ask nothing of them. We do not inquire into their own private lives. That comes when they are of age and can join us should they want to. We certainly cannot ask them while they are underage. We just share information and nothing more.
 
Valete in pace Deorum,
 
Maxima Valeria Messallina
Sacerdos Vestalis
 


--- On Sat, 1/31/09, Gnaeus Iulius Caesar <gn_iulius_caesar@...> wrote:

From: Gnaeus Iulius Caesar <gn_iulius_caesar@...>
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: de Romanis
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Date: Saturday, January 31, 2009, 7:36 PM

Salve Marine
 
A very sound position on your part. To do otherwise would certainly also run the risk of Nova Roma being labeled as somehow a whacked out child stealing cult in those parts of the salacious tittle-tattle media. Besides which a republican Roman would have looked very askance at the "state" taking this role upon itself. In respect of the parents of the minor, who could knows if parental permission had been truly granted for the minor to join Nova Roma? If it had been refused and for the parents then to find out that their offspring had defied them and joined Nova Roma and been accepted by us knowing they were a minor and parceled out to new "parents", well I could well imagine a dearth of negative publicity.
 
Vale bene
Cn. Iulius Caesar.

Sent: Saturday, January 31, 2009 6:23 PM
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: de Romanis

Salve Plauta,

Lucia Livia Plauta <cases@freemail. hu> writes:

> I think a solution might be not to reject outright underage
> applicants, but to "put them up for adoption", and allow them to join
> us, but only with an adult NR citizen as their guardian.

This would expose Nova Roma to serious legal problems.  I'm not sure 
how EU countries would view this, but I am sure that a number of 

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60846 From: Gaius Petronius Dexter Date: 2009-02-01
Subject: Re: de Romanis
C. Petronius Valeriae Messalinae s.p.d.,
 
>>> Well, we could have a separate list for minors only, say from
ages 12 to 17. They would not be members, but they could get
information from us about ancient Rome and all things roman.

Minors can not access to the Yahoo main list to question us about
Roman life?

>>> That way we fan the flame would out letting the fire consumed us,
i.e., keep them interested until they are of age to join us and not
be accused of "adopting" them or recruiting them.

Some churches or "religions" are less upright if we look around us,
they for example do not doubt to mutilate little girls or little boys
(even if those mutilations are said traditional) and make them liable
to a real thought control. Some learn all in one book.

But I understand and I share the viewpoint to be cautious against the
accusation of recruiting children because it is easy to say something
devilish when children are in. So they will be not members of Nova
Roma but they will are able to read the main list, I presume.

Optime vale.
C. Petronius Dexter.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60847 From: Gaius Petronius Dexter Date: 2009-02-01
Subject: Re: Edictum de Creatione Scribae
C. Petronius Dexter A. Tulliae Scholasticae rogatrici s.p.d.,

> By this edict, I appoint C. Petronius Dexter as scriba for
Latinity. No oath will be required.<

Thank you very much. It is a great honor to me to be involved in the
Latinity of Nova Roma, I will share my knowledges of Latin language
with everybody which wants.

Today some members of the Latin Circle of Paris and I, we meet a
journalist of France Inter in the café La Méthode rue Descartes, in
the quartier Latin near the Pantheon to discuss and debate about the
living Latin and also about the financial crises in Ancient Rome
(Romans did know the subprimes?). ;o)

I will try to have a word with him about Nova Roma.

Optime vale.

C. Petronius Dexter
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60848 From: marcushoratius Date: 2009-02-01
Subject: KALNDAE FEBRUARIAE: Juno Februa, Juno Sospita, Vesta, and Jupiter To
M. Moravius Piscinus cultoribus Deorum et omnibus salutem plurimam
dicit: Di vos salvas et servatas volunt.

Hodie est Kalendae Februariae; haec dies nefastus est: DIE QUINTI TE
KALO, IUNO COVELLA: dies natalis aedes Vestae in Foro; Iunoni
Sospitae Matri Regioni; natalis aedes Iovis Tonantis

"On the Kalends of February when Sirius begins to set, then arrives,
with hail, Auster, and Eurinus winds." ~ Columella, De Re Rutica 9.2.5


Juno Februa

The month of February is sacred to Juno Februa, whose temple was
located on the Esquiline Hill near the Temple of Juno Lucina. Februa
is a Goddess of purification, and much of the month is devoted to
purification rites in preparation for the coming of the New Year in
March. In the religio Romana purification has mainly to do with
fulfilling one's obligations to your ancestors. Thus we will see in
the month of Februarius a parentalia performed for ancestors, and the
Feralia that is conducted for other Manes, while festivals for
Terminus and Fornicalia, ancient rites, have much to do with the
ancerstral worship of Di parenti, and of course there are the very
special purification rites of Lupercalia and Quirinalia that are
thought by some to extend back to a period when Rome was still
divided among the Latins on the Palatine Hill and Sabines on the
Quirinal Hill.


Juno Sospita

"At the start of the month, they say, that Juno the Saviour (Sospita),
Neighbouring the Phrygian Mother, was honoured with new shrines.
If you ask where those temples, dedicated to the Goddess
On the Kalends, are now, they are fallen with the lapse of time."
~ Ovidius Naso, Fasti 2.55-58


AUC 556 / 197 BCE: Defeat of the Gallic tribes and vow of a Temple
for Juno Sospita

"When they had raised the required force and completed all the
necessary business, both sacred and secular, both the consuls left
for Gaul. Cornelius took the direct road to the Insubres, who in
conjunction with the Cenomani were in arms; Q. Minucius bent his
course to the left side of Italy towards the Adriatic, and marching
his army to Genua began operations in the direction of Liguria. Two
fortified towns, Clastidium and Litubium, both belonging to the
Ligurians, and two of their communities, the Celeiates and the
Cerdiciates, surrendered. All the tribes on this side the Po were now
reduced except the Boii in Gaul and the Ilvates in Liguria. It was
stated that 15 fortified towns and 20,000 men surrendered.

"From there he led his legions into the country of the Boii, whose
army had not long before crossed the Po. They had heard that the
consuls intended to attack with their united legions, and in order
that they too might consolidate their strength by union they had
formed a junction with the Insubres and Cenomani. When a report
reached them that one of the consuls was firing the fields of the
Boii, a sharp difference of opinion arose; the Boii demanded that all
should render assistance to those who were hard pressed, the Insubres
declared that they would not leave their own country defenceless.
Their forces were accordingly divided; the Boii went off to protect
their country, the Insubres and Cenomani took up a position on the
bank of the Mincius. On the same river, two miles lower down,
Cornelius fixed his camp. From there he sent to make enquiries in
Brixia, their capital. and in their villages, and from what he learnt
he was quite satisfied that it was not with the sanction of their
elders that the younger men had taken up arms, nor had the national
council authorised any assistance being given to the revolted
Insubrians. On learning this he invited their chiefs to a conference
and tried to induce them to break with the Insubres and either return
home or go over to the Romans. He was unable to gain their consent to
the latter proposal, but they gave him assurances that they would
take no part in the fighting, unless occasion should arise, in which
case they would assist the Romans. The Insubres were kept in
ignorance of this compact, but they felt somewhat suspicious as to
the intentions of their allies, and in forming their line they did
not venture to entrust them with a position on either wing lest they
should abandon their ground through treachery and involve the whole
army in disaster. They were accordingly stationed in the rear as a
reserve. At the outset of the battle the consul vowed a temple to
Juno Sospita in case the enemy were routed that day, and the shouts
of the soldiers assured their commander that they would enable him to
fulfil his vow. Then they charged, and the Insubres did not stand
against the first shock. Some authors say that the Cenomani attacked
them from behind while the battle was going on and that the twofold
attack threw them into complete disorder, 35,000 men being killed and
5200 made prisoners, including the Carthaginian general Hamilcar, the
prime instigator of the war. 130 standards were taken and numerous
wagons. Those of the Gauls who had followed the Insubres in their
revolt surrendered to the Romans." ~ Titus Livius 32.29;30

AUC 663 /90 CE: Caecilia Metella and the Temple of Juno Sospita

During the time of the Marsian War, Caecilia Metella, daughter of
Quintus, dreamt that since the women of Rome had taken to using the
Temple of Juno Sospita as a public lavatory, and because a bitch had
whelped her pups at the foot of Her statue, the Goddess had abandoned
the temple, and also planned to leave Rome, prophesizing a series of
disasters, all of which came true. Caecilia asked Juno Sospita to
stay. She cleansed the temple and restored it, inviting the Goddess
to remain, and thereby saved Rome. ~ M. Tullius Cicero, De
Divinatione 1.99


Juno Sospita, the Savior, was the main deity of Lanuvium. She is
generally depicted armed with a shield and spear, Her long gown
covered by a goat skin that is drawn up so as its horns appear on Her
head. In 338 BCE Lanuvium was one of the Latin cities defeated by
Rome, but in surrendering its people were granted Roman citizenship
and their temples restored to them, meaning, too, that these became
Roman temples under authority of Roman pontifes (Livy 8.14). The
Temple of Juno Sospita at Lanuvium is mentioned in various instances
by Livy, drawing upon the Libri Pontifici, where the decemviri sacris
faciudis, on the advice of the Sibylline Oracles, recommended
sacrifices be offered to Her during the war with Hannibal (Livy
21.62; 22.1; 24.10; 29.14). After 197 BCE She was given a temple
residence in Rome itself, just as the junones of other Goddesses had
been brought to Rome from Veii, Carthage, and elsewhere, and Her
temple Lanuvium is not heard of again. Ovid says that a temple for
Her once stood near the Temple of Magna Mater, which was on the
Palatine, but that in his day no such temple for Juno, or else Diana,
stood there. There was, however, a Temple of Juno Sospita in the
Forum Holitorium. Perhaps he meant it was the temple of Magna Mater
adjoining Hers. Magna Mater who had a temple next to that of Juno
Sospita in the Forum Holitorium after She, ave tii oeribn, s her g
arrived, Kuvuus tells how Her barge become low in the water, eve
beached on embankment. Like the Vestal Virgins at Rome and Lavinium,
at Lanuvium Juno Seispita Mater Regina was served by maidens. Into
Her sacred grove at Lanuvium at several times in a year, the virgins
Junoni brought Her barley cakes while they remained blindfolded. If
these were accepted and eaten by serpents that lived in Her sacred
grove, it was interpreted as a sign of the maidens being virgins and
the land fertile, both signs of abundance for the coming year (J. G.
Frazer, Publii Ovidii Nasonis Fastorum Libri, 1929; Vol. 1, pp.296-
297).


AUC 40 / 713 BCE: Dedication of the Temple of Vesta in the Forum

On this day too the grove of Alernus is crowded,
Near where Tiber, from afar, meets the ocean waves.
At Numa's sanctuary, and the Thunderer's on the Capitol,
And on the summit of Jove's citadel, a sheep is sacrificed.
~ Ovidius Naso, Fasti 2.67-70

Alernus was an ancient and obscure deity whose sacred grove was near
where the Tiber emptied into the sea. In his grove dwelt the nymph
Cranae, whom Ovid confused with Carna and Cardea (Ovid, Fasti 6.105-
106. Numa's sanctuary refers to the Temple of Vesta.

"Furthermore it is said that Numa built the Temple of Vesta, where
the perpetual fire was kept, of a circular form, not in imitation of
the shape of the earth, believing Vesta to be the earth, but of the
entire universe, at the centre of which the Pythagoreans place the
element of fire and call it Vesta and Monad. And they hold that the
earth is neither motionless nor situated in the centre of surrounding
space, but that it revolves in a circle about the central fire, not
being one of the most important, nor even one of the primary elements
of the universe. This is the conception, we are told, which Plato
also, in his old age, had of the earth, namely that it is established
in a secondary space, and that the central and sovereign space is
reserved for some other and nobler body." ~ Plutarch, Life of Numa
11.1-2

"[Numa] also chose virgin priestesses for Vesta. This priesthood
originated at Alba and was not therefor alien to the founder of
Rome. So that these priestesses should be able to devote their whole
time to temple service, he provided them with an income from public
funds; he conferred a special sanctity on them by ritual obligations,
including the keeping of their virginity." ~ Titus Livius 1.20.3

"At first, they say, Numa consecrated Gegania and Verania, followed
by Canuleia and Tarpeia. Later Servius added two more, making the
number six that has been maintained up to our present time.It was
ordained by the king that the sacred virgins should vow themselves to
chastity for thirty years; during the first decadethey are to learn
their duties, during the second to perform the duties they have
learned, and during the third to teach their duties to others. Then
the thirty years being now passed, any one who wishes has liberty to
marry and adopt a different mode of life, after laying down her
sacred office. We are told however that few have welcomed the
indulgence, and that those who did so were not happy, but were a prey
to repentance and dejection for the rest of their lives, thereby
inspiring the rest with religious fear, so that until old age and
death they remained steadfast in their virginity. Numa gave them
great honors, among which was the right to make a will during the
lifetime of their father and to deal with their other affairs without
the need for a guardian, like mothers of three children. When they
appear in public, the fasces are carried before them, and if they
accidentally meet a criminal on his way to execution, his life is
spared; but the virgin must make oath that the meeting was
involuntary and fortuitous, and not by design. He who passes under
the litter on which they are borne, is put to death." ~ Plutarch,
Life of Numa 10.1-4


"Thunderous Jupiter Tonans, I pray that finally You may spare me"
(Valerius Flaccus Argonautica 4.474-5).

Finally, then, Ovid refers to the Temple for Jupiter Tonans that was
dedicated on the Capitoline Hill by Augustus after he was narrowly
missed by a lightning bolt while campaigning in Hispania. On the
Capitoline Hill, too, Ovid says that a sheep was sacrificed,
referring to the Kalends of each month, but it is not a sacrifice to
Jupiter Tonans to which he refers.

On the Kalends of each month a sheep was sacrificed to Juno by a
Pontifex Minor at the Curia Calabra (Macrobius, Saturnalia 1.15.18).
Then the Pontifices announced the day on which the Nones would fall,
always eight days before the Ides. Thus it would either be called
out, "die quint te kalo, Iuno Covells" or else, "Septimi die te kalo,
Iuno Covella" to mark the Nones falling on the fifth or the seventh
day of the month (Varro, Linga Latina 6.27).


Our thought for today is from Epicurus, Vatican Sayings 71:

"Question each of your desires: 'What will happen to me if that which
this desire seeks is achieved, and what if it is not?"
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60849 From: rexantartida Date: 2009-02-01
Subject: I'm a new Roman citizen
Salve!

The Gods are greatest!

How I met with others romans and celebrate together?

I can perfom a roman rite...


Vale Bene!


Gaius Iullus Triarius
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60850 From: Publius Memmius Albucius Date: 2009-02-01
Subject: Circulum Latin. Lutetiae
Dextro s.d.

>we meet a journalist of France Inter in the café La Méthode rue
>Descartes, (..)
> I will try to have a word with him about Nova Roma.

You have my endorsement as praetor Galliae. Have a good meeting and
please give me info back. :-)

Vale bene,


Albucius
pr. Gal.


--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Gaius Petronius Dexter"
<jfarnoud94@...> wrote:
>
> C. Petronius Dexter A. Tulliae Scholasticae rogatrici s.p.d.,
>
> > By this edict, I appoint C. Petronius Dexter as scriba for
> Latinity. No oath will be required.<
>
> Thank you very much. It is a great honor to me to be involved in
the
> Latinity of Nova Roma, I will share my knowledges of Latin language
> with everybody which wants.
>
> Today some members of the Latin Circle of Paris and I, we meet a
> journalist of France Inter in the café La Méthode rue Descartes, in
> the quartier Latin near the Pantheon to discuss and debate about
the
> living Latin and also about the financial crises in Ancient Rome
> (Romans did know the subprimes?). ;o)
>
> I will try to have a word with him about Nova Roma.
>
> Optime vale.
>
> C. Petronius Dexter
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60851 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2009-02-01
Subject: Re: I'm a new Roman citizen
Salve Triari!

Welcome to Nova Roma. We have many active citizens in Hispania. I
hope they'll get in contact with you soon.

Vale,

CN-EQVIT-MARINVS


rexantartida <rexantartida@...> writes:

> Salve!
>
> The Gods are greatest!
>
> How I met with others romans and celebrate together?
>
> I can perfom a roman rite...
>
>
> Vale Bene!
>
>
> Gaius Iullus Triarius
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60852 From: Amelie Zapf Date: 2009-02-01
Subject: Re: de Romanis
P. Aemilia Scaeva M. Valeriae Messalinae omnibusque in grege s.p.d.

Excuse me, this may be a (quite horrified) newbie question.

> We do not inquire into their own private lives. That comes when
> they are of age and can join us should they want to.

Oh, does Nova Roma do that? That makes me _seriously_ reconsider my
participation in here, since I do consider what's going on in my private life
to be entirely my business.

Valete omnes!

P. Aemilia Scaeva
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60853 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2009-02-01
Subject: Re: de Romanis
Salve Scaevola,

Amelie Zapf <amy@...> writes:

> P. Aemilia Scaeva M. Valeriae Messalinae omnibusque in grege s.p.d.
>
> Excuse me, this may be a (quite horrified) newbie question.
>
>> We do not inquire into their own private lives. That comes when
>> they are of age and can join us should they want to.
>
> Oh, does Nova Roma do that?

No, we do not. We have quite explicit laws against it. While some
religious offices require some self-disclosure about personal
practices, there is absolutely no requirement for private citizens to
tell us anything at all about their private lives.

Vale,

CN-EQVIT-MARINVS
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60854 From: Albert Galceran Vidal Date: 2009-02-01
Subject: Re: I'm a new Roman citizen
Salve!
 
I had gone to change my name "Triarius" for "Postumus", because I'm a latter son. My contact is msn rexantartida@..., principally.
 
Vale Bene Optimus.


De: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus <gawne@...>
Para: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Enviado: domingo, 1 de febrero, 2009 13:46:21
Asunto: Re: [Nova-Roma] I'm a new Roman citizen

Salve Triari!

Welcome to Nova Roma. We have many active citizens in Hispania. I
hope they'll get in contact with you soon.

Vale,

CN-EQVIT-MARINVS

rexantartida <rexantartida@ yahoo.es> writes:

> Salve!
>
> The Gods are greatest!
>
> How I met with others romans and celebrate together?
>
> I can perfom a roman rite...
>
>
> Vale Bene!
>
>
> Gaius Iullus Triarius


Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60855 From: Metrobius Date: 2009-02-01
Subject: Re: Newbie Questions Re: de Romanis
Salvete,

I'm going to jump on top of this newbie question and ask two of my own:

What ramifications does joining Nova Roma have in "the real world," if any? Like things involving citizenship status and all that.

Also, what are the consequences of not paying taxes, if any? This is being asked because of a lack of money, not to get out of it.

Bene Valete,
M. Sempronia Pulla


--- On Sun, 2/1/09, Gnaeus Equitius Marinus <gawne@...> wrote:
From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus <gawne@...>
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: de Romanis
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Date: Sunday, February 1, 2009, 1:08 PM

Salve Scaevola,

Amelie Zapf <amy@ameliezapf. com> writes:

> P. Aemilia Scaeva M. Valeriae Messalinae omnibusque in grege s.p.d.
>
> Excuse me, this may be a (quite horrified) newbie question.
>
>> We do not inquire into their own private lives. That comes when
>> they are of age and can join us should they want to.
>
> Oh, does Nova Roma do that?

No, we do not. We have quite explicit laws against it. While some
religious offices require some self-disclosure about personal
practices, there is absolutely no requirement for private citizens to
tell us anything at all about their private lives.

Vale,

CN-EQVIT-MARINVS


Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60856 From: Kristoffer From Date: 2009-02-01
Subject: Re: Newbie Questions
Salve, Marca Sempronia Pulla.

Metrobius wrote:
> What ramifications does joining Nova Roma have in "the real world," if any? Like things involving citizenship status and all that.
>

Presently, no negative effects of Nova Roman citizenship are known. Of
course, it IS possible that we are being "registered" somewhere, but the
odds are most who do this sort of registering would file us under
"mostly harmless".

Practically, our citizenship is closer to membership in a club than
actual citizenship - we are working on making it mean more, but that's a
long-term goal.

> Also, what are the consequences of not paying taxes, if any? This is being asked because of a lack of money, not to get out of it.
>

Your votes will have less impact in the comitia, due to century and
tribe placement. You will become a "capiti censi", the term for the
"disenfranchised" class in Rome, which means you won't be able to run
for office.

Vale, Titus Octavius Pius.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60857 From: Metrobius Date: 2009-02-01
Subject: Re: Newbie Questions
Salve Titus Octavius Pius!

Thanks for answering my questions. :)

Bene Vale,
M. Sempronia Pulla

--- On Sun, 2/1/09, Kristoffer From <from@...> wrote:
From: Kristoffer From <from@...>
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Newbie Questions
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Date: Sunday, February 1, 2009, 1:28 PM

Salve, Marca Sempronia Pulla.

Metrobius wrote:
> What ramifications does joining Nova Roma have in "the real world," if any? Like things involving citizenship status and all that.
>

Presently, no negative effects of Nova Roman citizenship are known. Of
course, it IS possible that we are being "registered" somewhere, but the
odds are most who do this sort of registering would file us under
"mostly harmless".

Practically, our citizenship is closer to membership in a club than
actual citizenship - we are working on making it mean more, but that's a
long-term goal.

> Also, what are the consequences of not paying taxes, if any? This is being asked because of a lack of money, not to get out of it.
>

Your votes will have less impact in the comitia, due to century and
tribe placement. You will become a "capiti censi", the term for the
"disenfranchised" class in Rome, which means you won't be able to run
for office.

Vale, Titus Octavius Pius.


Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60858 From: Amelie Zapf Date: 2009-02-01
Subject: Re: de Romanis
Salve Marine,

> No, we do not. We have quite explicit laws against it.

Fine then :-)

Vale bene,

Scaeva
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60859 From: mwaldenberger Date: 2009-02-01
Subject: Re: de Romanis
Salvete Omnes,
If I might interject a thought that would seek to accomplish the ends
of educating the youth while including them in a way that does not
pose a problem for Nova Roma. Why not just start a "University"
section on the web where "students" can come, with parental
permission, to learn about ancient Rome. Completion of a course of
instruction would mean a certificate from Nova Roma that the teen
could then hold on to. In this way, you can include them, see that
they have the correct information and open their eyes to the
possibilities and responsibilities of being a citizen in Nova Roma
for when they have attained the correct age to seek membership on
their own.
This negates any "responsibility" of Nova Roma while allowing us to
fulfill an obligation to present facts rather than misconceptions and
wrong impressions. It accomplishes the mission, advances the aims of
Nova Roma while putting forth the real spirit and meaning of being a
Nova Roman citizen. This would also, I believe, do much to dispell
any misgivings parents might have because their children would
actually be learning something and doing it in a fun way without
having to worry about the snares and pitfalls that all kids encounter
today.
As teens become more interested in their studies, we could expand the
courses to include things such as Latin, manners and customs,
religion, etc. As time goes by and a student advances, they become
more interested and can then attend functions accompanied by parent
(s). This leaves the decision to the parents and the child on what to
attend or if to attend. Empowering people goes a long way towards
piquing interest and ensuring success.
As a broad field social studies major myself, if my children showed
an interest in history, I would do all that I could to support and
allow them to learn it, especially if there was an authorative source
for information that I knew could be trusted. It really could be a
win/win scenario that would accomplish all that everyone involved
hopes for.
Thank you for allowing me to once again come before and speak to you
my mind.

Di vos incolumes custodiant,
Marcus Claudius Farlanus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60860 From: Steve Moore Date: 2009-02-01
Subject: Latin for E-mail
M. Valerius Potitus omnibus SPD.

I encourage everyone to follow the Roman practice of placing your name
at the beginning of your e-mails.

Please see "Latin for E-mails" on the Nova Roma website:
http://novaroma.org/nr/Latin_for_e-mail. Another helpful site is:
http://www.cs.utk.edu/~mclennan/OM/CSC.html.

Placing your name at the beginning lets your readers know immediately
who the author of the e-mail is. This is helpful, because many people
(like myself) have something other than their Roman names in the
"From" line.

This is also a good opportunity to practice the dative case!

Valete.

M. Valerius Potitus
Quaestor
Aedilis Oppidi Fluminis Gilae
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60861 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2009-02-01
Subject: Re: Latin for E-mail
Salve Potite,

M. Valerius Potitus <astrobear@...> writes:

> M. Valerius Potitus omnibus SPD.
>
> I encourage everyone to follow the Roman practice of placing your name
> at the beginning of your e-mails.

There's an old saying about old dogs and new tricks. Some of us have
been using Salve and Vale in our letters for ten years, and aren't
likely to change any time soon.

> M. Valerius Potitus
> Quaestor
> Aedilis Oppidi Fluminis Gilae

Also, since you're so concerned with correctness, you might note that
Romans in antiquity didn't list titles after their names.

Vale,

CN-EQVIT-MARINVS
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60862 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2009-02-01
Subject: Re: Newbie Questions Re: de Romanis
Salve Pulla,

M. Sempronia Pulla <belovedmetrobius@...> writes:

> What ramifications does joining Nova Roma have in "the real world,"

I see Pius has already provided a very good answer. I'll just add
that I get asked about Nova Roma every year during security reviews.
We had one former magistrate and pontifex who had to leave NR because
his company's security office told him he wouldn't be able to continue
in his job if he remained in NR.

Vale,

CN-EQVIT-MARINVS
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60863 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2009-02-01
Subject: Re: de Romanis
Salve Farlane,

Marcus Claudius Farlanus <ghosthunter01@...> writes:

> Why not just start a "University"
> section on the web where "students" can come, with parental
> permission, to learn about ancient Rome.

We already have the Academia Thules. While it's officially not a part
of Nova Roma due to legal considerations, it has a lot of overlap with
Nova Roma including faculty and students who are mostly citizens of
NR. The Academia offers many courses dealing with Roma antiqua.

Vale,

CN-EQVIT-MARINVS
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60864 From: Metrobius Date: 2009-02-01
Subject: Re: Newbie Questions Re: de Romanis
Salve Marinus,

Thanks for letting me know about that, especially because I may go back into the government sector. Shame that it affected someone's job.

Bene Vale,
M. Sempronia Pulla

--- On Sun, 2/1/09, Gnaeus Equitius Marinus <gawne@...> wrote:
From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus <gawne@...>
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Newbie Questions Re: de Romanis
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Date: Sunday, February 1, 2009, 3:46 PM

Salve Pulla,

M. Sempronia Pulla <belovedmetrobius@ yahoo.com> writes:

> What ramifications does joining Nova Roma have in "the real world,"

I see Pius has already provided a very good answer. I'll just add
that I get asked about Nova Roma every year during security reviews.
We had one former magistrate and pontifex who had to leave NR because
his company's security office told him he wouldn't be able to continue
in his job if he remained in NR.

Vale,

CN-EQVIT-MARINVS


Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60865 From: Metrobius Date: 2009-02-01
Subject: Re: de Romanis
Salvete Omnes,

Does anyone remember this one website where you could become a person from a given period in ancient history (name and all) and you maintained a relevant page and could join groups and things and even had an avatar? I completely forgot what it was called (Ancient Sites maybe?). I remember being a Roman was particularly popular. If anyone has the means for something like that, it could attract a lot of young people. Like a Nova Roma for minors. I can see problems with that with possible weirdos pretending to be kids and stuff but who knows.

Bene Valete,
M. Sempronia Pulla

--- On Sun, 2/1/09, Gnaeus Equitius Marinus <gawne@...> wrote:
From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus <gawne@...>
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: de Romanis
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Date: Sunday, February 1, 2009, 3:49 PM

Salve Farlane,

Marcus Claudius Farlanus <ghosthunter01@ centurytel. net> writes:

> Why not just start a "University"
> section on the web where "students" can come, with parental
> permission, to learn about ancient Rome.

We already have the Academia Thules. While it's officially not a part
of Nova Roma due to legal considerations, it has a lot of overlap with
Nova Roma including faculty and students who are mostly citizens of
NR. The Academia offers many courses dealing with Roma antiqua.

Vale,

CN-EQVIT-MARINVS


Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60866 From: Lucia Livia Plauta Date: 2009-02-01
Subject: Re: de Romanis
L. Livia Plauta omnibus S.P.D.

Oh, I didn't think my comments on extending citizenship to minors
would raise such a number of issues.

In Europe it's quite common for minors to be members of associations:
they just need a parent's signature. As a child I was member of WWF,
and a local association for the protection of birds. Of course, those
weren't religious associations, but as long as NR isn't a church,
there should be no problems.

Anyway Valeria Messalina's proposal seems sound to me. Actually one
of the arguments brought more often in moderating the main list is
that there are minors on it, so why not let minor applicants in too?
We could tell them: "No, you can't be a citizen yet, but you can join
our mailing lists, where 90% of our social life happens anyway, and
you're welcome, with your parents or with their permission, to join
us at any live provincial activity."

Petroni, the mutilations you talk about are probably an argument
little understood by our American citizens. Ritual mutilation of
little boys is very widespread in North America, and it seems to have
very little to do with religion. In fact, you can bet that most of
the men reading this list have been subjected to it as children.
Some peoples pierce their girl children's ears, and others, oh,
well .... , and neither has to do with religion.
Even the ritual mutilation of little girls has no real connection
with religion.

Oh, sorry: even mentioning this topic is so horrible that I guess
I'll do a sacrifice to Dea Salus, and pray her to preserve every
human being's bodily integrity.

Optime valete omnes,
Livia


--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Gaius Petronius Dexter"
<jfarnoud94@...> wrote:
>
> C. Petronius Valeriae Messalinae s.p.d.,
>  
> >>> Well, we could have a separate list for minors only, say from
> ages 12 to 17. They would not be members, but they could get
> information from us about ancient Rome and all things roman.
>
> Minors can not access to the Yahoo main list to question us about
> Roman life?
>
> >>> That way we fan the flame would out letting the fire consumed
us,
> i.e., keep them interested until they are of age to join us and not
> be accused of "adopting" them or recruiting them.
>
> Some churches or "religions" are less upright if we look around us,
> they for example do not doubt to mutilate little girls or little
boys
> (even if those mutilations are said traditional) and make them
liable
> to a real thought control. Some learn all in one book.
>
> But I understand and I share the viewpoint to be cautious against
the
> accusation of recruiting children because it is easy to say
something
> devilish when children are in. So they will be not members of Nova
> Roma but they will are able to read the main list, I presume.
>
> Optime vale.
> C. Petronius Dexter.
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60867 From: Q. Caecilius Metellus Date: 2009-02-01
Subject: Re: de Romanis
Q Caecilius Metellus L Liuiae Plautae Omnibusque salutem dicit.

Just as much as you didn't suspect the issue of extending citizenship would
raise what it has, I didn't suspect my 'epistle' would raise such issues.

Indeed, in saying that we should welcome all Romans, I didn't necessarily intend
that they should become citizens. I'm not opposed to it, of course, but it
wasn't where I was heading with the comment. Similarly, in my mentioning that
we should educate others, I equally meant nothing of citizenship, though again,
I'm not opposed. I think Q Poplicola got the best of what I intended: Romans,
of whatever organisation they choose, are Romans nonetheless, and we should
treat them as such.

Di nos custodiant!

Quintus Caecilius Metellus Postumianus

http://hiereus.livejournal.com
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60868 From: Albert Galceran Vidal Date: 2009-02-01
Subject: Re: Newbie Questions Re: de Romanis
Salve:

I had to read a lot of messages about the question of citizenship, what is worriest thing?

I'm a student of University of Barcelona, of History degree. ( www.ub.edu ) What are problems to register to Nova Roma?, I always like the Roman culture, and to restore the religion. If not? Thanks for answering.

Vale Bene

De: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus <gawne@...>
Para: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Enviado: domingo, 1 de febrero, 2009 16:46:09
Asunto: Re: [Nova-Roma] Newbie Questions Re: de Romanis

Salve Pulla,

M. Sempronia Pulla <belovedmetrobius@ yahoo.com> writes:

> What ramifications does joining Nova Roma have in "the real world,"

I see Pius has already provided a very good answer. I'll just add
that I get asked about Nova Roma every year during security reviews.
We had one former magistrate and pontifex who had to leave NR because
his company's security office told him he wouldn't be able to continue
in his job if he remained in NR.

Vale,

CN-EQVIT-MARINVS


Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60869 From: Q. Caecilius Metellus Date: 2009-02-01
Subject: Kalendis Februariis Iunoni
Q Caecilius Metellus Romanis Peregrinisque salutem dicit.

Saluete, Fratres Sororesque.

This afternoon I offered to Juno a libation in place of the sacrifice she would
otherwise have received in Antiquity. I have the good fortune of being able to
report that I seem to be having less problems with my toga. Also, I am, I
daresay, elated to report that, though in past offerings I could only report no
ill omens observed, at least one positive sign was received at the conclusion of
this offering.

My usual custom, after the piaculum, is to step backwards away from the altar,
briefly kneel, then clean the area. As I lifted my foot to take the first step,
a cardinal (I'm inclined to believe it specifically a male Northern Cardinal
(cardinalis cardinalis)) passed by, from my left to my right, about 10-15 metres
ahead of me. As it happened, I was facing southwest, the bird then flying from
southeast to northwest. I'm no augur, of course, and the bird was no eagle, but
it's a sign nonetheless. At any rate, I suspect Juno was happy with her
libation today.

Di nos custodiant!

Quintus Caecilius Metellus Postumianus
Pontifex
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60870 From: Q. Valerius Poplicola Date: 2009-02-01
Subject: Re: de Romanis
Valerius Valeriae omnibusque SPD:

I'm in favor of this idea with the exception of it being a list. From
my own experience as a webmaster, youngsters these days respond far
better to forums (especially the classic PHP forums, PHPBB2, SMF,
vBulletin, etc...). An email list like this is actually quite antiquated.

bene ualete!

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Maxima Valeria Messallina
<violetphearsen@...> wrote:
>
> Salvete,
>  
> Well, we could have a separate list for minors only, say from ages
12 to 17. They would not be members, but they could get information
from us about ancient Rome and all things roman. That way we fan the
flame would out letting the fire consumed us, i.e., keep them
interested until they are of age to join us and not be accused of
"adopting" them or recruiting them. We simply allow them a place to
come and ask their questions. We ask nothing of them. We do not
inquire into their own private lives. That comes when they are of age
and can join us should they want to. We certainly cannot ask them
while they are underage. We just share information and nothing more.
>  
> Valete in pace Deorum,
>  
> Maxima Valeria Messallina
> Sacerdos Vestalis
>  
>
>
> --- On Sat, 1/31/09, Gnaeus Iulius Caesar <gn_iulius_caesar@...> wrote:
>
>
> From: Gnaeus Iulius Caesar <gn_iulius_caesar@...>
> Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: de Romanis
> To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> Date: Saturday, January 31, 2009, 7:36 PM
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Salve Marine
>  
> A very sound position on your part. To do otherwise would certainly
also run the risk of Nova Roma being labeled as somehow a whacked out
child stealing cult in those parts of the salacious tittle-tattle
media. Besides which a republican Roman would have looked very askance
at the "state" taking this role upon itself. In respect of the parents
of the minor, who could knows if parental permission had been truly
granted for the minor to join Nova Roma? If it had been refused and
for the parents then to find out that their offspring had defied them
and joined Nova Roma and been accepted by us knowing they were a minor
and parceled out to new "parents", well I could well imagine a dearth
of negative publicity.
>  
> Vale bene
> Cn. Iulius Caesar.
>
>
>
>
> From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus
> Sent: Saturday, January 31, 2009 6:23 PM
> To: Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com
> Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: de Romanis
>
> Salve Plauta,
>
> Lucia Livia Plauta <cases@freemail. hu> writes:
>
> > I think a solution might be not to reject outright underage
> > applicants, but to "put them up for adoption", and allow them to join
> > us, but only with an adult NR citizen as their guardian.
>
> This would expose Nova Roma to serious legal problems.  I'm not sure 
> how EU countries would view this, but I am sure that a number of 
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60871 From: Maior Date: 2009-02-01
Subject: Re: Circulum Latin. Lutetiae
M. Hortensia G. Petronio P. Memmioque spd:
un cercle latin à Lutetia, je pousse des larmes d'angoisse et de
envie;-) Amusez-vous bien O Galles érudits.
bene valete
Maior

>
> Dextro s.d.
>
> >we meet a journalist of France Inter in the café La Méthode rue
> >Descartes, (..)
> > I will try to have a word with him about Nova Roma.
>
> You have my endorsement as praetor Galliae. Have a good meeting and
> please give me info back. :-)
>
> Vale bene,
>
>
> Albucius
> pr. Gal.
>
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Gaius Petronius Dexter"
> <jfarnoud94@> wrote:
> >
> > C. Petronius Dexter A. Tulliae Scholasticae rogatrici s.p.d.,
> >
> > > By this edict, I appoint C. Petronius Dexter as scriba for
> > Latinity. No oath will be required.<
> >
> > Thank you very much. It is a great honor to me to be involved in
> the
> > Latinity of Nova Roma, I will share my knowledges of Latin
language
> > with everybody which wants.
> >
> > Today some members of the Latin Circle of Paris and I, we meet a
> > journalist of France Inter in the café La Méthode rue Descartes,
in
> > the quartier Latin near the Pantheon to discuss and debate about
> the
> > living Latin and also about the financial crises in Ancient Rome
> > (Romans did know the subprimes?). ;o)
> >
> > I will try to have a word with him about Nova Roma.
> >
> > Optime vale.
> >
> > C. Petronius Dexter
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60872 From: Q. Valerius Poplicola Date: 2009-02-01
Subject: Magna Mater
Poplicola omnibus sal.

Can anyone explain this a little bit more in detail?

"A: Financial support for a publication and translation of a master's
or doctoral thesis on the "Mater Magna in the Roman Empire" with a
target date of auc 2764 (2011)"

Gratias vobis ago!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60873 From: MCC Date: 2009-02-02
Subject: EDICTUM CONSULARE DE TABULA PRETIORUM VECTIGALIUM NOVAE ROMAE ANNO 2
Ex officio consularis:

Tax payments for this year, 2762 a.U.c (AD 2009), will be accepted until
30th April 2762 a.U.c at 23:59 Roman time.

The Tax Rate Table for 2762 can be found in the Nova Roma web at
http://www.novaroma.org/nr/Tax_rate_MMDCCLXII.

Each provincial governor is required to copy this edict to their
provincial lists (where applicable).

This edict takes effect immediately.

Given under my hand this 2nd day of February 2762 a.U.c (AD 2009), in
the consulship of M. Curiatius and M. Iulius.

M. Curiatius Complutensis
Consul
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60874 From: MCC Date: 2009-02-02
Subject: EDICTUM CONSULARE DE TABULA PRETIORUM VECTIGALIUM NOVAE ROMAE ANNO 2
Ex officio consularis:
El pago de los Impuestos para este año , 2762 a.U.c (AD 2009), será aceptado hasta el 30 de Abril 2762 a.U.c a las 23:59 horas (hora de Roma).

La Tabla con los importes de los Impuestos para 2762 puede ser encontrada en la web de Nova Roma web en http://www.novaroma.org/nr/ES:Tax_rate_MMDCCLXII.

Los gobernadores provinciales son requeridos para copiar y traducir este edicto en sus respectivas listas provinciales (si existen).

Este edicto entra en vigor inmediatamente.

Dado por mi mano en este 2º dia de Febrero de 2762 a.U.c (AD 2009), en el Consulado de M. Curiatius y M.Iulius.


M. Curiatius Complutensis
Consul


Extracto de la tabla de Impuestos para los paises hispano y luso hablantes:
1 Argentina (AR) Argentina 4,83 16,61 Argentine pesos (ARS)
5 Brazil (BR) Brasilia 3,43 10,35 Reals (BRL)
8 Chile (CL) - 5,13 3.106,46 Chilean pesos (CLP)
10 Colombia (CO) - 3,00 6.844,61 Colombian pesos (COP)
11 Costa Rica (CR) - 3,97 2.200,00 Costa Rican colones (CRC)
19 Guatemala (GT) - 1,80 14,03 Quetzales (GTQ)
33 Mexico (MX) Mexico 4,8 67,39 Mexican pesos (MXN)
38 Panama (PA) - 3,97 3,97 Balboas (PAB)
39 Peru (PE) - 3,83 9,01 Nuevo sol (PEN)
41 Portugal (PT) Hispania 7,33 5,64 Euros (EUR)
42 Puerto Rico (PR) - 6,23 6,23 US dollars
51 Spain (ES) Hispania 11,37 8,74 Euros (EUR)
58 Uruguay (UY) - 4,10 93,48 Uruguayan pesos (UYU)
67 Venezuela (VE) - 4,67 10,04 Bolivares (VEB)

 
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60875 From: MCC Date: 2009-02-02
Subject: EDICTUM CONSULARE DE TABULA PRETIORUM VECTIGALIUM NOVAE ROMAE ANNO 2
Ex officio consularis:

Il pagamento  delle Tasse di quest'anno , 2762 a.U.c (AD 2009), sará acettato fino al 30 Aprile 2762 a.U.c alle 23:59 ore (ora di Roma).

La Tabella con le Tasse del  2762 si puó trovare nella web de Nova Roma web en http://www.novaroma.org/nr/Tax_rate_MMDCCLXII.

Si chiede ai governatori provinciali che copino e traducano questo editto nelle loro rispettive liste provinciali.

Questo editto é valido immediatamente.

Dato nel 2º giorno di Febbraio di 2762 a.U.c (AD 2009), nel Consolato di M. Curiatius y M.Iulius.


M. Curiatius Complutensis

Consul


Estratto della tabella:

26 Italy (IT) Italia 10,33 7,94 Euros (EUR)

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60876 From: titus.aquila Date: 2009-02-02
Subject: EDICTUM CONSULARE DE TABULA PRETIORUM VECTIGALIUM NOVAE ROMAE ANNO 2
Ex officio consularis:

Steuerzahlungen fuer das Jahr, 2762 a.U.c. (AD2009), werden bis zum
30.April 2762 a.U.c. , 23:59 Uhr roemischer Zeit akzeptiert.

Die Steuertabelle fuer 2762 a.U.c. kann hier eingesehen werden.

http://www.novaroma.org/nr/ES:Tax_rate_MMDCCLXII

Jeder Provinz Gubernator hat dieses Edikt auf seiner Provinz
Webseite (wo zutreffend) zu veroeffentlichen.

Dieses Edikt tritt mit sofortiger Wirkung in Kraft.

Gegeben unter meiner Hand, den 2.Februar2762 a.U.c (AD 2009), im
Konsulat von M. Curiatius and M. Iulius.

M. Curiatius Complutensis
Consul
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60877 From: marcushoratius Date: 2009-02-02
Subject: a. d. IV Nonas Februarias: Clodius begins prosecuting Milo
M. Moravius Piscinus cultoribus Deorum, Quiritibus et omnibus salutem
plurimam dicit: Di vos inculumes custodiant

Hodie est ante diem IIII Nonas Februarias; haec dies fastus aterque
est: sacra Junonis Februae

On this day, for Juno Februa of the door, Romans place roasted spelt
and salt on their doorsills, outside the door, along with offerings
of milk, honey, and water, perhaps a lighted lamp.


"These are the Principles of Law: to live honestly, to harm no one,
and to give each his due." ~ Gaius, De Institutiones Justiniani 1.2


AUC 696 / 57 BCE: Clodius impeaches Milo for employing gladiators

"On the 2nd of February Milo appeared for trial. Pompey came to
support him. Marcellus spoke on being called upon by me. We came off
with flying colours. The case was adjourned to the 7th." ~ M Tullius
Cicero, Epistulum ad Quintum 2.3

Clodius was running for the office of Aedilis. One of his opponents
was Marcellus, who helped defend Milo in this case. Clodius'
objective was really to lend some embarrassment to Cicero, Pompey,
and Milo, as the case he presented against Milo had little
merit.While he was able to rouse the crowds to his favor, he
apparently got the worst of it in the trial.

"After this Clodius attained the aedileship in the year of Philippus
and Marcellinus; for, being anxious to avoid the lawsuit, he had got
himself elected by a political combination. He immediately instituted
proceedings against Milo for providing himself with gladiators,
actually charging him with the very thing he was doing himself and
for which he was likely to be brought to trial. He did this, not in
the expectation of convicting Milo, inasmuch as the latter had many
strong champions, among them Cicero and Pompey, but in order that
under this pretext he might not only carry on a campaign against Milo
but also insult his backers. For example, the following was one of
his devices. He had instructed his clique that whenever he should ask
them in assemblies: 'Who was it that did or said so-and so?' they
should all cry out: 'Pompey!' Then on several occasions he would
suddenly ask about everything that could be taken amiss in Pompey,
either in the way of physical peculiarities or any other respect,
touching upon such topics individually, one at a time, as if he were
not speaking of him particularly. Thereupon, as usually happens in
such cases, some would start up and others would join in with them,
crying 'Pompey!' and there was much jeering. Now Pompey could not
control himself and keep quiet, nor would he stoop to a trick like
that of Clodius, and so he grew exceedingly angry, yet could not
stir; thus nominally Milo was the defendant, but in reality Pompey
was being convicted without even offering a defence. For Clodius, in
order to embarrass him the more, would not allow the lex curiata to
be introduced; and until that was enacted no other serious business
could be transacted in the state or any suit instituted.

"For a season, then, Milo served as an excuse for their taunts and
assassinations. But about this time some portents occurred: on the
Alban Mount a small temple of Juno, set on a kind of table facing the
east, was turned around toward the north; a blaze of light darted
from the south across to the north; a wolf entered the city; an
earthquake occurred; some of the citizens were killed by
thunderbolts; in the Latin territory a subterranean tumult was heard;
and the soothsayers, being anxious to find a remedy, said that some
divinity was angry with them because some temples or consecrated
sites were being used for residence. Then Clodius substituted Cicero
for Milo and not only attacked him vigorously in a speech because the
site of the house he had built upon was dedicated to Liberty, but
even went to it once, with the intention of razing it to the ground;
but he did not do so, as he was prevented by Milo. Cicero, however,
was as angry with him as if he had actually accomplished his purpose,
and kept making accusations. Finally, taking with him Milo and some
tribunes, he ascended the Capitol and took down the tablets set up by
Clodius to commemorate his exile. This time Clodius came up with his
brother Gaius, a praetor, and took them away from him, but later he
watched for a time when Clodius was out of town, and going up to the
Capitol again, took them and carried them home. After this
occurrence no quarter was shown on either side, but they abused and
slandered each other as much as they could, without refraining from
the basest means. The one declared that the tribuneship of Clodius
had been contrary to the laws and that therefore his official acts
were invalid, and the other that Cicero's exile had been justly
decreed and his return unlawfully voted." ~ Dio Cassius 39.18-21


Our thought for today comes from the Discourses of Epictetus 3.10.2:

Let sleep not come upon thy languid eyes
Before each daily action thou hast scann'd;
What's done amiss, what done, what left undone;
From first to last examine all, and then
Blame what is wrong, in what is right rejoice.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60878 From: rexantartida Date: 2009-02-02
Subject: Hay un manual para rito romano?
Salve!

Quería pedir libros o alguna pagina web, gracias de todos modos.
Que contenga todo, en original de la época romana.

Vale Bene.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60879 From: MCC Date: 2009-02-02
Subject: Re: Hay un manual para rito romano?
Salve

en original y de esta epoca un poco dificil ;-)

En la web de Nova Roma (http://www.novaroma.org/nr/ES:Main_Page) tienes el apartado Religio Romana (Cultus Deorum) donde puedes encontrar almenos una parte de la información que buscas y enlaces a libros.

Vale bene

COMPLVTENSIS

rexantartida escribió:

Salve!

Quería pedir libros o alguna pagina web, gracias de todos modos.
Que contenga todo, en original de la época romana.

Vale Bene.

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60880 From: gaiuspopilliuslaenas Date: 2009-02-02
Subject: EDICTVM CENSORIVM DE SCRIBIS PROROGANDIS
Ex Officio
EDICTVM CENSORIVM DE SCRIBIS PROROGANDIS

Censores Tiberius Galerius Paulinus Gaius Popillius Laenas quiritibus
salutem plurimam dicunt.

Extension of Appointments to the Office of citizenship approval

M. Curiatius Complutensis and Marcus Iulius Severus have been a great
help to the office of the Censores dealing with new citizenship
applications.

As they are willing to continue with this service, their appointments
are hereby extended until they decide to step down or until December
31, 2009, whichever comes sooner.

They have the sincere thanks of the Censores for their willingness to
continue to serve.

The Censors also appoint Lucia Herennia Mento and Cocceius Spinula as
Scriba in the Office of citizenship approval.

No oaths are required.

Given under our hands this 2nd day of February 2762 A.U.C. in the
consulships of M. Curiatius and M. Iulius.


Tiberius Galerius Paulinus
Gaius Popillius Laenas
Censores, Novae Romae
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60881 From: Tiberius Horatius Barbatus Date: 2009-02-02
Subject: MITHRACON XII IS COMING
Tiberius Horatius Barbatus Quiritibus S.P.D.

New England Conference of Mithraic Studies

The subject event, while not a Nova Roma sponsored event, is one which is certainly of
consideration to those who are interested in the different religions and cults of ancient
Rome. It is a long-enduring event and was one of the first events offered in the Provincia
Nova Britannia. The worship of Mithra was a popular one with the officers and men of the
Legions, and it is believed in some quarters that this religion had a significant impact on
ancient Christianity, in regard to the different aspects of the religion and the way the
Religion was honored and celebrated.

This conference is held in New Haven, CT the 17th through 19th of April, and arranged by Sibylla Ambrosia Fulvia. Current plans call for a scholarly raid on the stacks of Yale
University Library followed by a Bull Feast and evening presentations on Mithraism in the
Imperium Romanum and on allied subjects of interest to students of history.

Convention sessions will be held at the New Haven Courtyard-by-Marriott, about four
blocks from Yale Library. The Courtyard has ample parking on site, a marvelous thing for
downtown in a university town.

I therefore urge any citizen or friend of Nova Roma, who may be interested in Mithraism,
ancient Roman Religions and cults, or just in an opportunity to meet others so interested
for discussions and a good time to consider this event.

For more information, or to register go to the web site:

http://www.mithracon.org/index.html

Gratias

Di vos incolumes custodiant
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60882 From: D. Aemilus Severus Date: 2009-02-02
Subject: Re: EDICTUM CONSULARE DE TABULA PRETIORUM VECTIGALIUM NOVAE ROMAE AN
I notice the new tax rate is US$13.40 (Canada Citerior) but when I went to pay I noticed that it is at a different rate of US$12.73 (last year's?).  Not a huge difference, but may be substantial when considering all Nova Roma.  This occurred last year as well, and I can't recall exactly, but I think not much was made of it.  Should we just go ahead and pay the tax being listed?
 
D•ÆMILIVS•SEVERVS

On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 2:36 AM, MCC <complutensis@...> wrote:

Ex officio consularis:

Tax payments for this year, 2762 a.U.c (AD 2009), will be accepted until
30th April 2762 a.U.c at 23:59 Roman time.

The Tax Rate Table for 2762 can be found in the Nova Roma web at
http://www.novaroma.org/nr/Tax_rate_MMDCCLXII.

Each provincial governor is required to copy this edict to their
provincial lists (where applicable).

This edict takes effect immediately.

Given under my hand this 2nd day of February 2762 a.U.c (AD 2009), in
the consulship of M. Curiatius and M. Iulius.

M. Curiatius Complutensis
Consul


Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60883 From: Publius Memmius Albucius Date: 2009-02-02
Subject: Re: Circulum Latin. Lutetiae
Maiori s.d.

What I consider what missed the "Galles", I prefer the
word "Gaulois"... ;-)

Vale bene,


Albucius

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Maior" <rory12001@...> wrote:
>
> M. Hortensia G. Petronio P. Memmioque spd:
> un cercle latin à Lutetia, je pousse des larmes d'angoisse et de
> envie;-) Amusez-vous bien O Galles érudits.
> bene valete
> Maior
>
> >
> > Dextro s.d.
> >
> > >we meet a journalist of France Inter in the café La Méthode rue
> > >Descartes, (..)
> > > I will try to have a word with him about Nova Roma.
> >
> > You have my endorsement as praetor Galliae. Have a good meeting
and
> > please give me info back. :-)
> >
> > Vale bene,
> >
> >
> > Albucius
> > pr. Gal.
> >
> >
> > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Gaius Petronius Dexter"
> > <jfarnoud94@> wrote:
> > >
> > > C. Petronius Dexter A. Tulliae Scholasticae rogatrici s.p.d.,
> > >
> > > > By this edict, I appoint C. Petronius Dexter as scriba for
> > > Latinity. No oath will be required.<
> > >
> > > Thank you very much. It is a great honor to me to be involved
in
> > the
> > > Latinity of Nova Roma, I will share my knowledges of Latin
> language
> > > with everybody which wants.
> > >
> > > Today some members of the Latin Circle of Paris and I, we meet
a
> > > journalist of France Inter in the café La Méthode rue
Descartes,
> in
> > > the quartier Latin near the Pantheon to discuss and debate
about
> > the
> > > living Latin and also about the financial crises in Ancient
Rome
> > > (Romans did know the subprimes?). ;o)
> > >
> > > I will try to have a word with him about Nova Roma.
> > >
> > > Optime vale.
> > >
> > > C. Petronius Dexter
> > >
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60884 From: Maior Date: 2009-02-02
Subject: Re: Circulum Latin. Lutetiae
Maior Albucio spd;
lol, mon cher Albuci, I shall employ Gaulois for sure;-) in your
case is this possible?: optimus vir Caenus.
valeas
Maior

>
> Maiori s.d.
>
> What I consider what missed the "Galles", I prefer the
> word "Gaulois"... ;-)
>
> Vale bene,
>
>
> Albucius
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Maior" <rory12001@> wrote:
> >
> > M. Hortensia G. Petronio P. Memmioque spd:
> > un cercle latin à Lutetia, je pousse des larmes d'angoisse et de
> > envie;-) Amusez-vous bien O Galles érudits.
> > bene valete
> > Maior
> >
> > >
> > > Dextro s.d.
> > >
> > > >we meet a journalist of France Inter in the café La Méthode
rue
> > > >Descartes, (..)
> > > > I will try to have a word with him about Nova Roma.
> > >
> > > You have my endorsement as praetor Galliae. Have a good meeting
> and
> > > please give me info back. :-)
> > >
> > > Vale bene,
> > >
> > >
> > > Albucius
> > > pr. Gal.
> > >
> > >
> > > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Gaius Petronius Dexter"
> > > <jfarnoud94@> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > C. Petronius Dexter A. Tulliae Scholasticae rogatrici s.p.d.,
> > > >
> > > > > By this edict, I appoint C. Petronius Dexter as scriba for
> > > > Latinity. No oath will be required.<
> > > >
> > > > Thank you very much. It is a great honor to me to be involved
> in
> > > the
> > > > Latinity of Nova Roma, I will share my knowledges of Latin
> > language
> > > > with everybody which wants.
> > > >
> > > > Today some members of the Latin Circle of Paris and I, we
meet
> a
> > > > journalist of France Inter in the café La Méthode rue
> Descartes,
> > in
> > > > the quartier Latin near the Pantheon to discuss and debate
> about
> > > the
> > > > living Latin and also about the financial crises in Ancient
> Rome
> > > > (Romans did know the subprimes?). ;o)
> > > >
> > > > I will try to have a word with him about Nova Roma.
> > > >
> > > > Optime vale.
> > > >
> > > > C. Petronius Dexter
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60885 From: Maxima Valeria Messallina Date: 2009-02-03
Subject: Re: de Romanis
I know. One has to thread very carefully where minors are concerned.
 
M. Valeria Messallina

--- On Sat, 1/31/09, Gnaeus Iulius Caesar <gn_iulius_caesar@...> wrote:

From: Gnaeus Iulius Caesar <gn_iulius_caesar@...>
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: de Romanis
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Date: Saturday, January 31, 2009, 9:32 PM

Salve Messallina.
 
I have to say anything other than the current policy on minors makes me very uneasy. I see the merit in your proposal, but I am still left with the feeling that this is one policy best left as it is.
 
Vale bene
Cn. Iulius Caesar

Sent: Saturday, January 31, 2009 9:39 PM
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: de Romanis

Salvete,
 
Well, we could have a separate list for minors only, say from ages 12 to 17. They would not be members, but they could get information from us about ancient Rome and all things roman. That way we fan the flame would out letting the fire consumed us, i.e., keep them interested until they are of age to join us and not be accused of "adopting" them or recruiting them. We simply allow them a place to come and ask their questions. We ask nothing of them. We do not inquire into their own private lives. That comes when they are of age and can join us should they want to. We certainly cannot ask them while they are underage. We just share information and nothing more.
 
Valete in pace Deorum,
 
Maxima Valeria Messallina
Sacerdos Vestalis
 


--- On Sat, 1/31/09, Gnaeus Iulius Caesar <gn_iulius_caesar@ yahoo.com> wrote:

From: Gnaeus Iulius Caesar <gn_iulius_caesar@ yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: de Romanis
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com
Date: Saturday, January 31, 2009, 7:36 PM

Salve Marine
 
A very sound position on your part. To do otherwise would certainly also run the risk of Nova Roma being labeled as somehow a whacked out child stealing cult in those parts of the salacious tittle-tattle media. Besides which a republican Roman would have looked very askance at the "state" taking this role upon itself. In respect of the parents of the minor, who could knows if parental permission had been truly granted for the minor to join Nova Roma? If it had been refused and for the parents then to find out that their offspring had defied them and joined Nova Roma and been accepted by us knowing they were a minor and parceled out to new "parents", well I could well imagine a dearth of negative publicity.
 
Vale bene
Cn. Iulius Caesar.

Sent: Saturday, January 31, 2009 6:23 PM
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: de Romanis

Salve Plauta,

Lucia Livia Plauta <cases@freemail. hu> writes:

> I think a solution might be not to reject outright underage
> applicants, but to "put them up for adoption", and allow them to join
> us, but only with an adult NR citizen as their guardian.

This would expose Nova Roma to serious legal problems.  I'm not sure 
how EU countries would view this, but I am sure that a number of 


Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60886 From: Maxima Valeria Messallina Date: 2009-02-03
Subject: Re: de Romanis
I was told they could not.
 
M. Valeria Messallina

--- On Sat, 1/31/09, Gaius Petronius Dexter <jfarnoud94@...> wrote:

From: Gaius Petronius Dexter <jfarnoud94@...>
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: de Romanis
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Date: Saturday, January 31, 2009, 9:58 PM

C. Petronius Valeriae Messalinae s.p.d.,
 
>>> Well, we could have a separate list for minors only, say from
ages 12 to 17. They would not be members, but they could get
information from us about ancient Rome and all things roman.

Minors can not access to the Yahoo main list to question us about
Roman life?

>>> That way we fan the flame would out letting the fire consumed us,
i.e., keep them interested until they are of age to join us and not
be accused of "adopting" them or recruiting them.

Some churches or "religions" are less upright if we look around us,
they for example do not doubt to mutilate little girls or little boys
(even if those mutilations are said traditional) and make them liable
to a real thought control. Some learn all in one book.

But I understand and I share the viewpoint to be cautious against the
accusation of recruiting children because it is easy to say something
devilish when children are in. So they will be not members of Nova
Roma but they will are able to read the main list, I presume.

Optime vale.
C. Petronius Dexter.



Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60887 From: Maxima Valeria Messallina Date: 2009-02-03
Subject: Re: de Romanis
Ah, you read far too much into what I said. I meant to imply we cannot ask children about their homes, where they go to school, those sorts of things, lest we be accused of less than appropiate attention. Once they are adults, that is no longer an issue.
No one is going to pry into your private life. No one is going to ask you a single question unless you want to enter one of the priesthoods. That is different.
Now please calm down.
 
M. Valeria Messallina


--- On Sun, 2/1/09, Amelie Zapf <amy@...> wrote:

From: Amelie Zapf <amy@...>
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: de Romanis
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Date: Sunday, February 1, 2009, 5:00 AM

P. Aemilia Scaeva M. Valeriae Messalinae omnibusque in grege s.p.d.

Excuse me, this may be a (quite horrified) newbie question.

> We do not inquire into their own private lives. That comes when
> they are of age and can join us should they want to.

Oh, does Nova Roma do that? That makes me _seriously_ reconsider my
participation in here, since I do consider what's going on in my private life
to be entirely my business.

Valete omnes!

P. Aemilia Scaeva

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60888 From: Maxima Valeria Messallina Date: 2009-02-03
Subject: Re: de Romanis
Oh this sounds very promising.
 
M. Valeria Messallina


--- On Sun, 2/1/09, mwaldenberger <ghosthunter01@...> wrote:

From: mwaldenberger <ghosthunter01@...>
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: de Romanis
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Date: Sunday, February 1, 2009, 6:04 AM

Salvete Omnes,
If I might interject a thought that would seek to accomplish the ends
of educating the youth while including them in a way that does not
pose a problem for Nova Roma. Why not just start a "University"
section on the web where "students" can come, with parental
permission, to learn about ancient Rome. Completion of a course of
instruction would mean a certificate from Nova Roma that the teen
could then hold on to. In this way, you can include them, see that
they have the correct information and open their eyes to the
possibilities and responsibilities of being a citizen in Nova Roma
for when they have attained the correct age to seek membership on
their own.
This negates any "responsibility" of Nova Roma while allowing us to
fulfill an obligation to present facts rather than misconceptions and
wrong impressions. It accomplishes the mission, advances the aims of
Nova Roma while putting forth the real spirit and meaning of being a
Nova Roman citizen. This would also, I believe, do much to dispell
any misgivings parents might have because their children would
actually be learning something and doing it in a fun way without
having to worry about the snares and pitfalls that all kids encounter
today.
As teens become more interested in their studies, we could expand the
courses to include things such as Latin, manners and customs,
religion, etc. As time goes by and a student advances, they become
more interested and can then attend functions accompanied by parent
(s). This leaves the decision to the parents and the child on what to
attend or if to attend. Empowering people goes a long way towards
piquing interest and ensuring success.
As a broad field social studies major myself, if my children showed
an interest in history, I would do all that I could to support and
allow them to learn it, especially if there was an authorative source
for information that I knew could be trusted. It really could be a
win/win scenario that would accomplish all that everyone involved
hopes for.
Thank you for allowing me to once again come before and speak to you
my mind.

Di vos incolumes custodiant,
Marcus Claudius Farlanus


Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60889 From: Maxima Valeria Messallina Date: 2009-02-03
Subject: Re: de Romanis
Salve, Marinus
 
I once sent several emails to the Academia and never got a reply. I wanted to take classes but they were completely unresponsive. I finally gave up.
I like the university idea and I think it should be part of Nova Roma so we can monitor it, because if parents have the same problems I had, no one is going to let their child take instruction there.
 
M. Valeria Messallina

--- On Sun, 2/1/09, Gnaeus Equitius Marinus <gawne@...> wrote:

From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus <gawne@...>
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: de Romanis
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Date: Sunday, February 1, 2009, 7:49 AM

Salve Farlane,

Marcus Claudius Farlanus <ghosthunter01@ centurytel. net> writes:

> Why not just start a "University"
> section on the web where "students" can come, with parental
> permission, to learn about ancient Rome.

We already have the Academia Thules. While it's officially not a part
of Nova Roma due to legal considerations, it has a lot of overlap with
Nova Roma including faculty and students who are mostly citizens of
NR. The Academia offers many courses dealing with Roma antiqua.

Vale,

CN-EQVIT-MARINVS

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60890 From: Gaius Petronius Dexter Date: 2009-02-03
Subject: Re: Circulum Latin. Lutetiae
C. Petronius M. Hortensiae s.p.d.,
 
Galles was the priests of Magna Mater and generally emasculated. I am only a whole flamen of Portune with his whirlygigs (I found an old and funny word to say family jewels, but as I do not know the level of the English language I hope that I am fine and polite by using this word). So, as P. Memmius I prefer the people name Gaulois. ;o)
 
So, monday 1st February at 16h30 pm (GMT+1) 3 other members of the Latin circle of Paris and I, we were interviewed by a student in journalism of the journalistical school of Lille, our interview will be broadcoasted on radio France Inter in these two weeks on an afternoon. He will give us the day.
 
We explain our love for the living Latin, for using as common and usual language the Latin. If the chearman of the Circle, Daniel, trully speaks an easy Latin, I am learning to speak and I often hesitate because my practice is recent. By the way, the journalist asked us if we had some experiences of using the living Latin language and, of course, I said that I am a member of Nova Roma and I could speak Latin with a Nova Roman citizen, more especially a Latin teacher of Hungary with Spyke.
 
C. Petronius Dexter
Irus et est subito qui modo Croesus erat.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60891 From: Maxima Valeria Messallina Date: 2009-02-03
Subject: Re: de Romanis
List, site, forums, university, whatever. Just as long as we have something for them.
 
M. Valeria Messallina

--- On Sun, 2/1/09, Q. Valerius Poplicola <catullus.poeta@...> wrote:

From: Q. Valerius Poplicola <catullus.poeta@...>
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: de Romanis
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Date: Sunday, February 1, 2009, 11:54 AM

Valerius Valeriae omnibusque SPD:

I'm in favor of this idea with the exception of it being a list. From
my own experience as a webmaster, youngsters these days respond far
better to forums (especially the classic PHP forums, PHPBB2, SMF,
vBulletin, etc...). An email list like this is actually quite antiquated.

bene ualete!

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com, Maxima Valeria Messallina
<violetphearsen@ ...> wrote:
>
> Salvete,
>  
> Well, we could have a separate list for minors only, say from ages
12 to 17. They would not be members, but they could get information
from us about ancient Rome and all things roman. That way we fan the
flame would out letting the fire consumed us, i.e., keep them
interested until they are of age to join us and not be accused of
"adopting" them or recruiting them. We simply allow them a place to
come and ask their questions. We ask nothing of them. We do not
inquire into their own private lives. That comes when they are of age
and can join us should they want to. We certainly cannot ask them
while they are underage. We just share information and nothing more.
>  
> Valete in pace Deorum,
>  
> Maxima Valeria Messallina
> Sacerdos Vestalis
>  
>
>
> --- On Sat, 1/31/09, Gnaeus Iulius Caesar <gn_iulius_caesar@ ...> wrote:
>
>
> From: Gnaeus Iulius Caesar <gn_iulius_caesar@ ...>
> Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: de Romanis
> To: Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com
> Date: Saturday, January 31, 2009, 7:36 PM
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Salve Marine
>  
> A very sound position on your part. To do otherwise would certainly
also run the risk of Nova Roma being labeled as somehow a whacked out
child stealing cult in those parts of the salacious tittle-tattle
media. Besides which a republican Roman would have looked very askance
at the "state" taking this role upon itself. In respect of the parents
of the minor, who could knows if parental permission had been truly
granted for the minor to join Nova Roma? If it had been refused and
for the parents then to find out that their offspring had defied them
and joined Nova Roma and been accepted by us knowing they were a minor
and parceled out to new "parents", well I could well imagine a dearth
of negative publicity.
>  
> Vale bene
> Cn. Iulius Caesar.
>
>
>
>
> From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus
> Sent: Saturday, January 31, 2009 6:23 PM
> To: Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com
> Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: de Romanis
>
> Salve Plauta,
>
> Lucia Livia Plauta <cases@freemail. hu> writes:
>
> > I think a solution might be not to reject outright underage
> > applicants, but to "put them up for adoption", and allow them to join
> > us, but only with an adult NR citizen as their guardian.
>
> This would expose Nova Roma to serious legal problems.  I'm not sure 
> how EU countries would view this, but I am sure that a number of 
>


Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60892 From: MCC Date: 2009-02-03
Subject: Re: EDICTUM CONSULARE DE TABULA PRETIORUM VECTIGALIUM NOVAE ROMAE AN
Salve et salvete

the payments must be made in US Dollars (Canada Citerior = USD 13.40). The rate in other currencies is only for informative purposes.

Vale et valete

M. Curiatius Complutensis
Consul

D. Aemilus Severus escribió:

I notice the new tax rate is US$13.40 (Canada Citerior) but when I went to pay I noticed that it is at a different rate of US$12.73 (last year's?).  Not a huge difference, but may be substantial when considering all Nova Roma.  This occurred last year as well, and I can't recall exactly, but I think not much was made of it.  Should we just go ahead and pay the tax being listed?
 
D•ÆMILIVS•SEVERVS

On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 2:36 AM, MCC <complutensis@ gmail.com> wrote:

Ex officio consularis:

Tax payments for this year, 2762 a.U.c (AD 2009), will be accepted until
30th April 2762 a.U.c at 23:59 Roman time.

The Tax Rate Table for 2762 can be found in the Nova Roma web at
http://www.novaroma .org/nr/Tax_ rate_MMDCCLXII.

Each provincial governor is required to copy this edict to their
provincial lists (where applicable).

This edict takes effect immediately.

Given under my hand this 2nd day of February 2762 a.U.c (AD 2009), in
the consulship of M. Curiatius and M. Iulius.

M. Curiatius Complutensis
Consul


Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60893 From: M. Lucretius Agricola Date: 2009-02-03
Subject: Re: Circulum Latin. Lutetiae
It would be a big help to the Nova Roma article on Wikipedia if there
would be a published program guide, or even a mention on their web
site (if any) that might include a reference to Nova Roma. We are in
dire need of citations, especially to printed works, but a broadcast
schedule would be good too.

MLA



--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Gaius Petronius Dexter"
<jfarnoud94@...> wrote:
>
> C. Petronius M. Hortensiae s.p.d.,
>
> Galles was the priests of Magna Mater and generally emasculated. I
am only a whole flamen of Portune with his whirlygigs (I found an old
and funny word to say family jewels, but as I do not know the level of
the English language I hope that I am fine and polite by using this
word). So, as P. Memmius I prefer the people name Gaulois. ;o)
>
> So, monday 1st February at 16h30 pm (GMT+1) 3 other members of the
Latin circle of Paris and I, we were interviewed by a student in
journalism of the journalistical school of Lille, our interview will
be broadcoasted on radio France Inter in these two weeks on an
afternoon. He will give us the day.
>
> We explain our love for the living Latin, for using as common and
usual language the Latin. If the chearman of the Circle, Daniel,
trully speaks an easy Latin, I am learning to speak and I often
hesitate because my practice is recent. By the way, the journalist
asked us if we had some experiences of using the living Latin language
and, of course, I said that I am a member of Nova Roma and I could
speak Latin with a Nova Roman citizen, more especially a Latin teacher
of Hungary with Spyke.
>
> C. Petronius Dexter
> Irus et est subito qui modo Croesus erat.
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60894 From: Gaius Petronius Dexter Date: 2009-02-03
Subject: Re: EDICTUM CONSULARE DE TABULA PRETIORUM VECTIGALIUM NOVAE ROMAE AN
C. Petronius Quiritibus s.p.d.,

> The Tax Rate Table for 2762 can be found in the Nova Roma web at
> http://www.novaroma.org/nr/Tax_rate_MMDCCLXII.

We can see that the yearly taxes level is from $ 0,73 in Nigeria to $
33,67 in Qatar.

So the recent proposal to classify citizens in classes by taxes is very
unfair. Because if we propose a taxe at $ 30 to be equestrian, a
Qatarian citizen is already equestrian and a Nigerian would have to
mortgage his house.

Valete.

C. Petronius Dexter
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60895 From: Cn. Cornelius Lentulus Date: 2009-02-03
Subject: R: [Nova-Roma] Re: EDICTUM CONSULARE DE TABULA PRETIORUM VECTIGALIUM
Lentulus Petronio suo sal.


>>> We can see that the yearly taxes level is from $ 0,73 in Nigeria to $
33,67 in Qatar.

So the recent proposal to classify citizens in classes by taxes is very
unfair. Because if we propose a taxe at $ 30 to be equestrian, a
Qatarian citizen is already equestrian and a Nigerian would have to
mortgage his house. <<<


No, no, not at all. This is not what the proposal says. The equestrian would have to pay the double of the assiduus tax. It means two times tax that he would have to pay as a plain assiduus. (The ratio, however, is not fixed in the proposal, I said either duplex or triplex as a moderate suggestion.)

So in this case the Qatarian should have to pay 67,34 $ for equestrian status, the Nigerian 1.46 $.

But as I'm seeing the tax rates and these results, I'm coming nearer and nearer to the opinion of those who think that a minimum level of taxes should be fixed.

I think the minimum tax rate should have to be no less 5 $ even in the poorest countries. (Perhaps a maximum level should equally be set up as 20 or 30 $...)

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60896 From: Cn. Cornelius Lentulus Date: 2009-02-03
Subject: Re: Circulum Latin. Lutetiae
Lentulus Petronio suo optimo sal.


>>> So, monday 1st February at 16h30 pm
(GMT+1) 3 other members of the Latin circle of Paris and I, we were interviewed by a student in journalism of the journalistical school of Lille, our interview will be broadcoasted on radio France Inter in these two weeks on an afternoon. He will give us the day. <<<


Congratulation to this! This is a really great event!
 

>>> We explain our love for the living Latin, for using as common and usual language the Latin. If the chearman of the Circle, Daniel, trully speaks an easy Latin, I am learning to speak and I often hesitate because my practice is recent. By the way, the journalist asked us if we had some experiences of using the living Latin language and, of course, I said that I am a member of Nova Roma and I could speak Latin with a Nova Roman citizen, more especially a Latin teacher of Hungary with Spyke. <<<


That would be me? ;-)


Vale!
Lentulus

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60897 From: Cn. Cornelius Lentulus Date: 2009-02-03
Subject: Re: de Romanis
Cn. Lentulus pontifex Valeriae Mesalinae virgini Vestali maximae sal.


>>> I once sent several emails to the Academia and never got a reply.
I wanted to take classes but they were completely unresponsive. I finally gave up.
I like the university idea and I think it should be part of Nova Roma so we can monitor it, because if parents have the same problems I had, no one is going to let their child take instruction there. <<<


Very much agreed. Nova Roma needs its own university. The cooperation between Nova Roma and Academia Thules is more than wonderful and the members of the Academia did a fantastic job during these years, but they themselves claim that they aren't part of Nova Roma. It implicitly means that we still need a university that is part of Nova Roma.

I'm all for this project, and in fact, last year I wanted to start something with teaching Latin in Nova Roma, I consulted with Avitus and some citizens.

We would need some teachers for Latin, Roman religion, philosophy, history, law etc... This is the problem...

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60898 From: MCC Date: 2009-02-03
Subject: EDICTO CONSULAR HISPANIAE LV (Complutensis XXX) SOBRE IMPUESTOS ANUA
Ex officio consularis Hispaniae:

De acuerdo con el Edicto Consular se ha fijado el pago de las tasas
anuales para España y Portugal en 11,37 y 7,33 Dolares USA
respectivamente. Estas tasas pueden pagarse a partir de ahora y hasta el
día 30 de Abril.

La Tabla oficial con los importes de los Impuestos para 2762 puede ser
encontrada en la web de Nova Roma web en
http://www.novaroma.org/nr/ES:Tax_rate_MMDCCLXII
<http://www.novaroma.org/nr/ES:Tax_rate_MMDCCLXII>

I- Pago directo a Nova Roma

Los pagos han de realizarse exclusivamente en Dolares USA y pueden
realizarse directamente mediante Paypal o Cheque Internacional de
acuerdo con las instrucciones que figuran en la pagina web arriba citada.

II- Pago a través del Gobernador Provincial

El Edicto Consular establece que para facilitar el pago en Euros y
evitar gastos de transferencia los gobernadores provinciales están
autorizados para recaudar dichas tasas y hacer un pago único al Tesoro
de Nova Roma.

Por ello los ciudadanos de la Provincia Hispania de Nova Roma que deseen
pagar sus impuestos a través del gobernador provincial podrán hacerlo
de acuerdo con la siguiente tabla:

*Los ciudadanos residentes en España deberán transferir o ingresar 9 Euros.

*Los ciudadanos residentes en Portugal deberán transferir o ingresar 7
Euros.

Ya que el pago a Nova Roma ha de realizarse única y exclusivamente en
Dolares USA, que los cambios indicados en la Tabla oficial son meramente
orientativos y debido a las fluctuaciones del cambio que experimenta
esta divisa, se ha establecido un redondeo destinado a cubrir posibles
fluctuaciones al alza del cambio de divisa y los gastos de transferencia
internacional.

III- Pago en la Regio Lusitaniae

Por este Edicto se autoriza expresamente al Praefectus Regionis
Lusitaniae Gaius Cocceius Spinula para que recaude los impuestos de la
Regio Lusitaniae y luego los transfiera al Tesoro Provincial. Los
ciudadanos de la Regio Lusitaniae deberán contactar con el Praefectus
Regionis para ultimar los detalles del pago.

IV- Forma de realizar el pago

Todos los ciudadanos que deseen pagar sus impuestos a través del Tesoro
Provincial deberán remitirme un correo privado para poder comunicarles
la forma y detalles de como ha de realizarse el pago.

Este edicto entra en vigor inmediatamente.

Dado por mi mano en este Tercer día de Febrero de 2762 a.U.c (AD 2009),
en el Consulado de M. Curiatius y M.Iulius.


M. Curiatius Complutensis

Cónsul
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60899 From: Gaius Marcius Crispus Date: 2009-02-03
Subject: Re: Magna Mater

C Marcius Crispus Q. Valerius Poplicola omnibusque S.P.D.

- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Q. Valerius Poplicola" wrote:

>
>> Can anyone explain this a little bit more in detail?
>
> "A: Financial support for a publication and translation of a master's
> or doctoral thesis on the "Mater Magna in the Roman Empire" with a
> target date of auc 2764 (2011)"
>
The idea, as I understand it, is to provide financial support for an academic study and published report about Magna Mater. MM is not widely known, even among academics, so the idea is that in addition to the other activities, we should support a scheme to increase awareness amongst academics.

Because this would be a learned thesis, and because Nova Roma sponsored it, NR would gain an amount of credence among the academics. This might encourage academics to look favourably upon NR, perhaps becoming members. And NR would gain acceptance among academics for other projects, so this could be a win- win situation.

Problem is I have no idea who these academics are or how we contact them, or what has already been done. Perhaps we could put a suitable invitation in an academic journal, asking for anyone interested to contact us.

If the thesis could also appear in one of the popular archaelogy magazines, with some mention of NR as the sponsors, this would again increase awareness of NR and encourage applications for membership.

But I don't know of any progress.

Does anyone have any suggestions?

 

Vale et valete optime

 

Crispus

 

 

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60900 From: Gnaeus Iulius Caesar Date: 2009-02-03
Subject: CURULE AEDILE EDICT 62-07: APPOINTMENT OF SCRIBAE AND DISMISSAL OF S
Cn. Iulius Caesar aed. Quiritibus sal.

CURULE AEDILE EDICT 62-07: APPOINTMENT AND DISMISSAL OF SCRIBAE

I hereby appoint the following two citizens as scribes, to be assigned
to one or more of the five work groups within the Cohors Aedilicia. No
oath is required of them. Further appointments may follow.

Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus
Quintus Fabius Labeo

I hereby formally dismiss the following scribe:

Marcus Aelius Severus

This is due to his having had to relinquish his duties owning to an
unexpected new employmemnt opportunity that sadly severely limits his
access to the internet for the next two years. He has my gratitude for
his willingness to serve the res publica.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60901 From: marcushoratius Date: 2009-02-03
Subject: a. d. III Nonas Februarias: Purity of mind and ethical conduct
M. Moravius Piscinus cultoribus Deorum et omnibus salutem plurimam
dicit: Dum tempus habemus operemur bonum

Hodie est ante diem III Nonas Februarias; haec dies nefastus est.

"When half of Leo and all of Canis have set, then Corus, or
Septentrio, sometimes Favonius, begin to arrive." ~ Columella, De Re
Rustica 9.2.13

"During the latter days of this period, whenever the nature of the
weather will allow it, the ground should be turned up with the double
mattock, for planting the rose and the vine – sixty men to a iugerum.
Ditches, too, should be cleared out, or new ones made; and the time
of day-break may be usefully employed in sharpening iron tools,
fitting on handles, repairing such dolia wine vats as may have
been broken, and rubbing and cleaning their staves." ~ Plinius
Secundus, Historia Naturalis 18.64

Purification

"May they approach the Gods and Goddesses while pure and chaste,
bringing piety, and leaving riches behind. Whosoever should do
otherwise, will be avenged upon by the God Himself."

"That is, purity of mind, for everything is included by that. This
does not remove the requirement of bodily purityÂ…for in the former
case impurity is removed by the sprinkling of water or the passage of
a certain number of days, but a mental stain can neither be blotted
out by the passage of time nor washed away by any stream." ~ M.
Tullius Cicero, De Legibus 2.8.19; 2.10.24-25

February is a month of preparation and of purification. March begins
the new year. We are advised to use this month to prepare the tools
needed to work farms, to prepare the soil when we can, as Columella
and Pliny wrote above, and we are also advised to prepare our selves
for a new year spent in service to the Gods. As we progress through
this month we shall come upon different rites and festivals that are
tied into a theme of purification. Of first importance, though, is
purity of mind. Cicero, above, was speaking on his idealized state
and on the religion that he thought would best serve his Republic.
He openly acknowledged that in some ways he modeled his idealized
religion on the religio Romana, stripped down, though, from what he
considered politically dangerous. On this one point that
purification must begin with a purity of mind, he echoed what was
normally thought in the religions of the Mediterranean. A
contemporary of Cicero's, a young poet and playwright who died in the
year following Cicero's consulship, inspired such later poets as
Horace as well as elderly statesmen like Julius Caesar and Cicero.
Persius wrote:

"Rightly, what is proper and just to offer the Gods are holiness of
mind and purity of heart in the deepest recesses of our being." ~
Aules Persius Flaccus, Satura 2.73-75

A little more than a hundred years later we find Pliny the Younger
adding his comments. Today we know of him through his letters, one
in which he described the events of Vesuvius destroying Pompeii,
Herculaneum, and Stabia, and with the death of his uncle, Pliny the
Elder. In his own time, he made his name as a trial lawyer, along
with his friend Tacitus, in a famous case in North Africa, and later
went on to become a Consul and Proconsul in Asia under the emperor
Trajan. In his day it was typical to offer flowery praises. In one
that he wrote we find the sentiment:

"The Gods rejoice more in the innocence of worshippers than in
elaborate prayers; the man who enters their temples with a pure heart
is more agreeable to them than one who recites a carefully prepared
litany." ~ C. Plinius Caecilius Secundus, Panegyricus 3

These ideas on first attaining a pure and guiltless mind were not
solely the expressions of a literary elite. They were ideas that
were fostered by the temples. Every temple had its own lex templi
that described what rites were permitted within their boundaries.
These were written on walls and spoken aloud. Typical lex templi
included rules of conduct, ethics, and moral prohibitions. This was
true in the temple precincts of Rome and in other cities, in the
religio Romana and in the religions of the Greeks and that of
Egyptians. An example of these comes from a Greek temple at
Philadelphia, dated to the first century BCE, with rules denoting
what would make a person impure, rules that are probably familiar to
everyone in one form or another:


"To observe the purification and cleansing rites, and offer the
sacrifices in accordance with ancestral rites and as now practiced.
Those who enter this house [i.e., temple], both men and women, both
bound and free, are to take oath before all the gods that, conscious
of no guile toward man or woman, they will not administer an evil
drug to men, nor will they learn or practice wicked charms, nor give
any philter, or any abortive or contraceptive drug, nor commit
robbery or murder, either carrying it out themselves or advising
another or acting as witness, nor overlook complacently those who rob
[or withhold offerings] in this house; and if anyone shall do any of
these things or advise them, they will not consent or pass over it in
silence, but will bring it out into the open and see that the crime
is punished.

"A man is not to take another woman in addition to his own wife,
either a free woman or a slave who has a husband, nor is he to
corrupt either a child [boy] or virgin, nor is he to counsel another
to do so; but if he should witness anyone doing such, he must not
hide it or keep silent. Woman and man, whoever does any of the
things above written, let them not enter this house. For the gods who
dwell here are mighty and watch over these things and will not hold
back punishment from those who transgress their commandments. A free
woman is to be pure and is not to know bed or intercourse with any
man other than her own husband. If she does she shall not be pure,
but is defiled and full of corruption within her family and is
unworthy to worship this god for whom these rites were established,
or to offer sacrifices, or to . . . [about 12 lines missing] to
stumble upon or to see the mysteries observed above. If anyone does
any of these things with which the commandments here copied have to
do, terrible curses from the gods will come upon those who disregard
them. For God does not by any means will that these things should
come to pass, nor does he desire it, but to obey [i.e., God wants
obedience, not to punish].

"To those who obey the gods will be gracious and will always be
giving them everything good, such as the gods desire to give men they
love. But if any transgress, they will hate such persons and lay
upon them great penalties."


Our thought for day comes from the Vatican Sayings 5, by Epicurus:

"It is not possible to live a pleasant life without living wisely and
honorably and justly, and it is not possible to live wisely and
honorably and justly without living pleasantly. Whenever any one of
these is lacking, when, for instance, the man is not able to live
wisely, though he lives honorably and justly, it is impossible for
him to live a pleasant life."
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60902 From: PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@aol.com Date: 2009-02-03
Subject: Re: Religio Hellenica versus Pax et Salus
Fl. Galerius Aurelianus Pontifex et flamen Cerialis S.P.D.

I would like to interrupt this debate to add my two asses (or obols).  The Dii Immortales, Dii Indigetes, Dii Infernii, et cetera are Italic Gods and have attributes and aspects that are different from the Greek Gods of Olympus.  Of course, as Roma extended its influence over the other cultures of Italia, there was some mixing of ideas.  My own cultus of Ceres was a Roman cultus but there were practices of the Greek ritus that were later attached to it as Roma spread into the south.

Neptunus was the God of hidden springs and irrigation but as time progressed, He became associated with Poseidon's spheres of the sea and horses.  There are altars to Neptunus near the Circus in Roma but I doubt it was for the purpose of irrigation.  Mars was originally a God of Agriculture, then of cavalry and, by the actions of Augustus, righteous warfare.  Mars was never equated with Ares who had only one temple in Greece and whose sphere of influence was all war & in whose train were Discord, Panic, Famine, and Oblivion.  The Greek Ares had more in common with the Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse than with Mars Gravidus or Mars Ulthior.

Now Apollo and the Dioscuri are essentially Greek Gods although the former was introduced to Rome as Apollo Medicus rather than as Apollo Far-shooter.

The beauty of the Sacra et Religio is the syncretic nature of the Dii because They can be associated with many other gods according to their aspects and attributes.

Valete.


-----Original Message-----
From: phoenixfyre17 <phoenixfyre17@...>
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Sat, 24 Jan 2009 12:29 am
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Religio Hellenica?

Salve

>>I would say the opposite: that Rome swallowed up the Greek gods
and gradually made them her own. That they were overwhelmingly the
Greeks' first is undeniable - and the fact that Mars is one of the
VERY few pre-existing Roman gods is an interesting sidenote here. So
what Rome made of them may be something quite different but the
stories, the histories, are the same.<<

Ummm...No. If there only a few handful of "original" Roman deities,
then please use your vast wealth of Greek Mythology to explain the
likes of Pales, Bona Dea, Falacer, Egeria, Vertumnus, Virbius,
Quirinus, Janus, Segetia, Dea Dia, Temepestates, Seia, Laverna,
Larunda, Tiberinus, Vediovis, Summanus, Semo Sancus, Terminus, Fors,
Forculus, Tellumo, Cacus, Caca, Ferentina, Lua Mater, Stata Mater,
Genita Mana, Robigo, Rumina, Carmentis, Inuus, Pomona, Picus,
Canens...need I say more?

Remember I said that the orthopraxy of the two religious traditions
probably differed - the "who stood where and did what when"; but the
foundation of a series of gods with the same basic attributes and
the same histories remains.<<

Please reveal with your wealth of mythology the tale that says how Zeus,
full of lust and desire for fornication, wandered from his native
Greece and indulged himself therewith in Rome? You won't find it. The Gods of Rome (who were not introduced at a later date like Magna Mater, Isis and so
on) do have specific histories that take root in Rome or the greater
extent of Latium in general.

Do yourself a favor and heed the advice of our Flaminica Carmentalis
and read up on the works of John Scheid and Mary Beard, they will
serve you well I promise you that.

Like I said previously, the literature of the Greeks became popular
in Rome, as did the philosophy, mathematics, and more! But as I
said, the way the Romans looked upon the Gods of Rome didn't change
whatsoever, hence the Greek Gods were not adopted or "swallowed" up
by Rome. The use of Roman names in the literature of the Greeks was
not to show that A equals B, but rather the idea that A is being
used to describe B for an audience already familiar with A.

In Pax Deorum Romanorum,
Nero

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60903 From: PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@aol.com Date: 2009-02-03
Subject: Re: SOCIAL REFORM AND TWO-TIER TAXATION SYSTEM
I join my hand to Quintus Fabio and agree with him completely.

Fl. Galerius Aurelianus


-----Original Message-----
From: QFabiusMaxmi@...
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 3:10 pm
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: SOCIAL REFORM AND TWO-TIER TAXATION SYSTEM

In a message dated 1/25/2009 6:31:46 P.M. Pacific Standard Time, aerdensrw@yahoo. com writes:
Election reform: To be blunt, If we truly want to have efficient,
effective elections, I believe we should dispense with using
centuries and tribes for elections and adopt instead a simple
majority wins system that is appropriate for the size of Nova Roma.
The Romans had a large enough voter population to make centuries and
tribes work for their elections. Nova Roma does not. I doubt that
many will agree with me, but hey, I'm for simplicity.
 
You are correct.  I do not agree. No point in doing a Rome reconstruction, if you do not follow the ancient Roman guidelines.
 
Q. Fabius Maximus


From Wall Street to Main Street and everywhere in between, stay up-to-date with the latest news.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60904 From: Cocceius Spinula Date: 2009-02-03
Subject: ÉDITO CONSULAR HISPANIAE LV (Complutensis XXX) SOBRE OS IMPOSTOS AN
Ex officio consularis Hispaniae:

De acordo com o Édito Consular foram afixados os valores dos impostos anuais para Espanha e para Portugal, em 11,37 e 7,33 Dólares USA
respectivamente. Estes impostos podem ser pagos a partir de agora e até ao dia 30 de Abril.

A Tabela oficial com o valor dos Impostos para 2762 pode ser encontrada na página:
http://www.novaroma.org/nr/PT:Tax_rate_ MMDCCLXII,
da Nova Roma web.

I- Pagamento directo a Nova Roma

Os pagamentos têm de ser feitos exclusivamente em Dólares USA e pode ser realizado directamente mediante Paypal ou Cheque Internacional de
acordo com as instruções presentes na página acima mencionada.

II- Pagamento através do Governador Provincial

O Édito Consular estabelece que para facilitar o pagamento em Euros e para evitar gastos de transferência os governadores provinciais estão autorizados a recolher os respectivos impostos e depois fazer um pagamento único ao Tesouro de Nova Roma.

Por isso os cidadãos da província da Hispânia de Nova Roma desejando pagar os seus impostos através do governador provincial poderá fazê-lo de acordo com a seguinte tabela:

*Os cidadãos residentes em Espanha devem transferir ou endereçar 9 Euros.

*Os cidadãos residentes em Portugal devem transferir ou endereçar 7 Euros.

Visto que o pagamento a Nova Roma tem de ser realizado exclusivamente em dólares americanos, as alterações listadas na tabela oficial são meramente formais e devido às flutuações do câmbio desta moeda, foi estabelecido um arredondamento para a cobertura de eventuais flutuações de câmbio e dos custosde transferências internacionais.

III- Pagamento na Regio Lusitaniae

Por este Édito autoriza-se expresamente ao Praefectus Regionis
Lusitaniae Gaius Cocceius Spinula que possa recolher os impostos da Regio Lusitaniae e logo os transfira para o Tesouro Provincial. Os cidadãos da Regio Lusitaniae devem assim contactar o Praefectus Regionis para obter os detelhes para o pagamento.

IV- Forma de realizar o pagamento

Todos os cidadãos que desejem pagar os seus impostos através do Tesouro Provincial deve remitir-me um e-mail em privado para poder comunicar-lhes a forma e os detalhes de como se há de realizar o pagamento.

Este édito entra en vigor imediatamente.

Dado pela minha mão, neste Terceiro dia de Fecereiro de 2762 a.U.c (AD 2009),
no Consulado de M. Curiatius e M.Iulius.

Em nome de M. Curiatius Complutensis, Cônsul

C. Cocceius Spinula
Provincia Hispania, Lusitania
Procurator Regionis Lusitaniae
Accensus Consulum et Scriba Censoris GPL

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60905 From: Charlie Collins Date: 2009-02-03
Subject: Latin Dictionary for Mac users
Salve,

While checking out new Mac software update on MacUpate.com I found this Latin dictionary. It's called Verba and is a simple interface to "A Latin Dictionary, by Lewis and Short".
Here is the link to the webpage it located at (Retinenda, The Lutheran Latin Podcast):


It is Mac only.

Vale,
Quintus Servilius Priscus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60906 From: Maior Date: 2009-02-03
Subject: Re: Circulum Latin. Lutetiae
M. Hortensia G. Petronio spd;
comme vous me faisez rire, cet mot, whirlygigs c'est charmant, badin,
et vous etes au meme temps savant et plien d'espieglerie [je deteste
cet dictionnaire nouvel; ou sont les mots d'antan? I used to know at
least 5 words for wit in French]

But this is really marvellous, the interview. Will it be broadcast
online please tell me Dexter, as I would love to listen to it.

Is this Daniel a classicist? What truly makes me happy is to see Latin
once again become the language of not the specialist but the vir
optimus urbanus around the world, In your case mixed with that
lightness, that witty playfulness that the French are so famous for.

As for our mutual friend in Pannonia, I spoke to him via google chat
and the sound was so pure, much better than skype. It's free, you just
need a google email account and you download the software. Write to me
if you need to know more.

Nova Roma and Latin, on French radio, it's great to see such dreams
coming true....
valeas mon cher gaulois, and forgive the lack of
accents, I'm writing via Linux and have not discovered where they've
hid them;-)

> Galles was the priests of Magna Mater and generally emasculated. I
am only a whole flamen of Portune with his whirlygigs (I found an old
and funny word to say family jewels, but as I do not know the level of
the English language I hope that I am fine and polite by using this
word). So, as P. Memmius I prefer the people name Gaulois. ;o)
>
> So, monday 1st February at 16h30 pm (GMT+1) 3 other members of the
Latin circle of Paris and I, we were interviewed by a student in
journalism of the journalistical school of Lille, our interview will
be broadcoasted on radio France Inter in these two weeks on an
afternoon. He will give us the day.
>
> We explain our love for the living Latin, for using as common and
usual language the Latin. If the chearman of the Circle, Daniel,
trully speaks an easy Latin, I am learning to speak and I often
hesitate because my practice is recent. By the way, the journalist
asked us if we had some experiences of using the living Latin language
and, of course, I said that I am a member of Nova Roma and I could
speak Latin with a Nova Roman citizen, more especially a Latin teacher
of Hungary with Spyke.
>
> C. Petronius Dexter
> Irus et est subito qui modo Croesus erat.
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60907 From: marcushoratius Date: 2009-02-04
Subject: Pridie Nonas Februarias: Funeral of Pertinax, Death of Severus
M. Moravius Piscinus cultoribus Deorum et omnibus salutem plurimam
dicit: Ab alio exspectes alteri quod feceris

Hodie est die pristine Nonas Februarias; haec dies nefastus est:

The Funeral of an Emperor

As a member of the Senate at the time, Dio Cassius participated in
the funeral of Pertinax that was presented by Septimus Severus. He
has left us this account of an emperor's funeral.

"Upon establishing himself in power he erected a shrine to Pertinax,
and commanded that his name should be mentioned at the close of all
prayers and all oaths; he also ordered that a golden image of
Pertinax should be carried into the Circus on a car drawn by
elephants, and that three gilded thrones should be borne into the
other amphitheatres in his honour. His funeral, in spite of the time
that had elapsed since his death, was carried out as follows. In the
Roman Forum a wooden platform was constructed hard by the marble
rostra, upon which was set a shrine, without walls, but surrounded by
columns, cunningly wrought of both ivory and gold. In it there was
placed a bier of the same materials, surrounded by heads of both land
and sea animals and adorned with coverlets of purple and gold. Upon
this rested an effigy of Pertinax in wax, laid out in triumphal garb;
and a comely youth was keeping the flies away from it with peacock
feathers, as though it were really a person sleeping. 4 While the
body lay in state, Severus as well as we senators and our wives
approached, wearing mourning; the women sat in the porticos, and we
men under the open sky. After this there moved past, first, images of
all the famous Romans of old, then choruses of boys and men, singing
a dirge-like hymn to Pertinax; there followed all the subject
nations, represented by bronze figures attired in native dress, and
the guilds of the City itself — those of the lictors, the scribes,
the heralds, and all the rest. Then came images of other men who had
been distinguished for some exploit or invention or manner of life.
Behind these were the cavalry and infantry in armour, the race-
horses, and all the funeral offerings that the emperor and we
senators and our wives, and the corporations of the City, had sent.
Following them came an altar gilded all over and adorned with ivory
and gems of India. When these had passed by, Severus mounted the
rostra and read a eulogy of Pertinax. We shouted our approval many
times in the course of his address, now praising and now lamenting
Pertinax, but our shouts were loudest when he concluded. Finally,
when the bier was about to be moved, we all lamented and wept
together. It was brought down from the platform by the high priests
and the magistrates, not only those who were actually in office at
the time by also those who had been elected for the ensuing year; and
they gave it to certain knights to carry. All the rest of us, now,
marched ahead of the bier, some beating our breasts and others
playing a dirge on the flute, but the emperor followed behind all the
rest; and in this order we arrived at the Campus Martius. There a
pyre had been built in the form of a tower having three stories and
adorned with ivory and gold as well as a number of statues, while on
its very summit was placed a gilded chariot that Pertinax had been
wont to drive. Inside this pyre the funeral offerings were cast and
the bier was placed in it, and then Severus and the relatives of
Pertinax kissed the effigy. The emperor then ascended a tribunal,
while we, the senate, except the magistrates, took our places on
wooden stands in order to view the ceremonies both safely and
conveniently. The magistrates and the equestrian order, arrayed in a
manner befitting their station, and likewise the cavalry and the
infantry, passed in and out around the pyre performing intricate
evolutions, both those of peace and those of war. Then at last the
consuls applied fire to the structure, and when this had been done,
an eagle flew aloft from it. Thus was Pertinax made immortal." ~ Dio
Cassius 75.4-5


AUC 964 / 211 CE: Death of Septimus Severus at York; ascension of
Caracalla and Geta. Caracella assumed the title of pontifex maximus
on this day.

"When this had been done, and the Caledonians had joined the revolt
of the Maeatae, he began preparing to make war upon them in person.
While he was thus engaged, his sickness carried him off on the fourth
of February, not without some help, they say, from Antoninus. At all
events, before Severus died, he is reported to have spoken thus to
his sons (I give his exact words without embellishment): 'Be
harmonious, enrich the soldiers, and scorn all other men.' After
this his body, arrayed in military garb, was placed upon a pyre, and
as a mark of honour the soldiers and his sons ran about it; and as
for the soldiers' gifts, those who had things at hand to offer as
gifts threw them upon it, and his sons applied the fire. Afterwards
his bones were put in an urn of purple stone, carried to Rome, and
deposited in the tomb of the Antonines. It is said that Severus sent
for the urn shortly before his death, and after feeling of it,
remarked: 'Thou shalt hold a man that the world could not hold.'" ~
Dio Cassius 77.15.2-4


Our thought for today is one that is common to many traditions. This
time it expressed byLaberius Decimus (107-43 BCE)

"As you behave towards others, expect that others will behave to
you."
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60908 From: aerdensrw Date: 2009-02-04
Subject: Re: EDICTUM CONSULARE DE TABULA PRETIORUM VECTIGALIUM NOVAE ROMAE AN
When I click on the link, I see only a message stating that "There is
currently no text on this page."

Paulla Corva

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, MCC <complutensis@...> wrote:
>
> Ex officio consularis:
>
> Tax payments for this year, 2762 a.U.c (AD 2009), will be accepted
until
> 30th April 2762 a.U.c at 23:59 Roman time.
>
> The Tax Rate Table for 2762 can be found in the Nova Roma web at
> http://www.novaroma.org/nr/Tax_rate_MMDCCLXII.
>
> Each provincial governor is required to copy this edict to their
> provincial lists (where applicable).
>
> This edict takes effect immediately.
>
> Given under my hand this 2nd day of February 2762 a.U.c (AD 2009),
in
> the consulship of M. Curiatius and M. Iulius.
>
> M. Curiatius Complutensis
> Consul
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60909 From: aerdensrw Date: 2009-02-04
Subject: Re: SOCIAL REFORM AND TWO-TIER TAXATION SYSTEM
P. Corva Fl. Galerio Aureliano Q. Fabio Maximo s.p.d.

*nods* As I said, I didn't expect anyone to agree with my views on
this subject. :)

My point, though, is that, when Rome was a town of approximately 1000
people, it would not have used a system of centuries and tribes for
voting (if it even had elections back then) because it would not have
needed that kind of system for so small a population.

During Julius Caesar's time, when the Republic had a far larger
population than 1000, the system of centuries and tribes enabled
voting to be efficient and orderly. With staggered voting, votes
could be counted slowly, according to century or tribe, instead of
overwhelming the Roman diribitores with a torrent of ballots all at
once.

Nova Roma's current citizenry numbers slightly over 1000 people. All
I am saying is, if we are dissatisfied with the way our NR elections
proceed, we can resolve that dissatisfaction by using a system that
is better suited to our smaller population.

Once NR's population reaches the point at which the ancient Romans
instituted tribes and centuries, then it would make perfect sense for
Nova Roma to use them. But, to me, it doesn't make sense right now.

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@... wrote:
>
> I join my hand to Quintus Fabio and agree with him completely.
>
> Fl. Galerius Aurelianus
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: QFabiusMaxmi@...
> To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 3:10 pm
> Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: SOCIAL REFORM AND TWO-TIER TAXATION
SYSTEM
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> In a message dated 1/25/2009 6:31:46 P.M. Pacific Standard Time,
aerdensrw@... writes:
>
> Election reform: To be blunt, If we truly want to have efficient,
> effective elections, I believe we should dispense with using
> centuries and tribes for elections and adopt instead a simple
> majority wins system that is appropriate for the size of Nova Roma.
> The Romans had a large enough voter population to make centuries
and
> tribes work for their elections. Nova Roma does not. I doubt that
> many will agree with me, but hey, I'm for simplicity.
>
>
>
>
>
> ?
>
> You are correct.? I do not agree. No point in doing a Rome
reconstruction, if you do not follow the ancient Roman guidelines.
>
> ?
>
> Q. Fabius Maximus
>
>
>
> In a message dated 1/25/2009 6:31:46 P.M. Pacific Standard Time,
aerdensrw@... writes:
>
> Election reform: To be blunt, If we truly want to have efficient,
> effective elections, I believe we should dispense with using
> centuries and tribes for elections and adopt instead a simple
> majority wins system that is appropriate for the size of Nova Roma.
> The Romans had a large enough voter population to make centuries
and
> tribes work for their elections. Nova Roma does not. I doubt that
> many will agree with me, but hey, I'm for simplicity.
>
>
>
>
>
> ?
>
> You are correct.? I do not agree. No point in doing a Rome
reconstruction, if you do not follow the ancient Roman guidelines.
>
> ?
>
> Q. Fabius Maximus
>
> From Wall Street to Main Street and everywhere in between, stay up-
to-date with the latest news.
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60910 From: Gnaeus Caelius Ahenobarbus Date: 2009-02-04
Subject: Re: SOCIAL REFORM AND TWO-TIER TAXATION SYSTEM
Caelius Corvae s.p.d.

    You know, you have a good point. Since Nova Roma is so small, tribes and centuries don't make sense. There are two solutions:

1) Remove tribes and centuries, and revert to a flat voting structure which does not imitate Roma antiqua
2) Increase Nova Roma's size

    I like the latter option the best. Of course, we could apply the reductionism to religion, too. Why do we worship all these gods. Heck, we don't even have clergy for most of them! Let's just reduce it to one or two, so we can focus on them. Screw the rest for now! We'll get to them when we have the people!
    Audi te. Vale!
 
--
Gnaeus Caelius Ahenobarbus
Lictor Curiatus, Accensus Consulum, et Scriba Aedilis Curulis
http://becomingnewthroughtheold.blogspot.com


Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60911 From: Gaius Petronius Dexter Date: 2009-02-04
Subject: Re: Circulum Latin. Lutetiae
C. Petronius Cn. Lentulo suo s.p.d.,

> That would be me? ;-)

Yes that is you. And also I said some words about your good
pronuntiation of the Latin language, short and long vowels...

The journalist recorded an interview of 1h30, with no moment of
silence, because we four were very passionate and ablaze. But only 20
mns will be broadcast (thanks Maior for your tactful correcting) on the
radio.

I hope the passage about Nova Roma will be broadcast but many other
interesting things were said in that 1h30.

Optime vale.
C. Petronius Dexter
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60912 From: Gnaeus Iulius Caesar Date: 2009-02-04
Subject: Re: EDICTUM CONSULARE DE TABULA PRETIORUM VECTIGALIUM NOVAE ROMAE AN

Caesar Corvae sal.

http://www.novaroma.org/nr/Tax_rate_MMDCCLXII

The previous link had a period at the end in error.

Optime vale.


--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "aerdensrw" <aerdensrw@...> wrote:
>
> When I click on the link, I see only a message stating that "There is
> currently no text on this page."
>
> Paulla Corva

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60913 From: Gaius Petronius Dexter Date: 2009-02-05
Subject: Re: Circulum Latin. Lutetiae
C. Petronius M. Hortensiae s.p.d.,

> comme vous me faisez rire, cet mot, whirlygigs c'est charmant,
badin,
> et vous etes au meme temps savant et plien d'espieglerie [je deteste
> cet dictionnaire nouvel; ou sont les mots d'antan? I used to know at
> least 5 words for wit in French]

Ouf! I was afraid to seem rude with these "whirlygigs", but this word
sound so funny that I liked to use it.

> Is this Daniel a classicist?

He is a young classic singer, son of a Sorbonne professor (La
Sorbonne is the older college of the university of Paris.)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sorbonne

His father spoke with him in Latin, since Daniel was 6 years old. In
fact, he is a truly bilingual French-Latin.

The circle has a website:
http://www.circulus.fr

Our next meeting is on Sunday.


Optime vale.

C. Petronius Dexter
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60914 From: Q. Ovidius Sabinus Date: 2009-02-05
Subject: Re: EDICTUM CONSULARE DE TABULA PRETIORUM VECTIGALIUM NOVAE ROMAE AN
Salve --

Somehow the period (.) got caught in the link. Remove that and then try. The same thing happened to me.

Bona fortuna (gr?)
- Q. O. Sabinus


aerdensrw wrote:

When I click on the link, I see only a message stating that "There is
currently no text on this page."

Paulla Corva

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com, MCC <complutensis@ ...> wrote:
>
> Ex officio consularis:
>
> Tax payments for this year, 2762 a.U.c (AD 2009), will be accepted
until
> 30th April 2762 a.U.c at 23:59 Roman time.
>
> The Tax Rate Table for 2762 can be found in the Nova Roma web at
> http://www.novaroma .org/nr/Tax_ rate_MMDCCLXII.
>
> Each provincial governor is required to copy this edict to their
> provincial lists (where applicable).
>
> This edict takes effect immediately.
>
> Given under my hand this 2nd day of February 2762 a.U.c (AD 2009),
in
> the consulship of M. Curiatius and M. Iulius.
>
> M. Curiatius Complutensis
> Consul
>



-- 
"Quid fine laboramus," asked the soldier building the road to the border.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60915 From: MCC Date: 2009-02-05
Subject: Re: EDICTUM CONSULARE DE TABULA PRETIORUM VECTIGALIUM NOVAE ROMAE AN
The conversion to HTML of the message has included a final dot in the link, delete it

http://www.novaroma .org/nr/Tax_ rate_MMDCCLXII

Vale

MCC


aerdensrw escribió:

When I click on the link, I see only a message stating that "There is
currently no text on this page."

Paulla Corva

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com, MCC <complutensis@ ...> wrote:
>
> Ex officio consularis:
>
> Tax payments for this year, 2762 a.U.c (AD 2009), will be accepted
until
> 30th April 2762 a.U.c at 23:59 Roman time.
>
> The Tax Rate Table for 2762 can be found in the Nova Roma web at
> http://www.novaroma .org/nr/Tax_ rate_MMDCCLXII.
>
> Each provincial governor is required to copy this edict to their
> provincial lists (where applicable).
>
> This edict takes effect immediately.
>
> Given under my hand this 2nd day of February 2762 a.U.c (AD 2009),
in
> the consulship of M. Curiatius and M. Iulius.
>
> M. Curiatius Complutensis
> Consul
>

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60916 From: QFabiusMaxmi@aol.com Date: 2009-02-05
Subject: Re: SOCIAL REFORM AND TWO-TIER TAXATION SYSTEM
In a message dated 2/4/2009 8:25:08 P.M. Pacific Standard Time, aerdensrw@... writes:
My point, though, is that, when Rome was a town of approximately 1000
people, it would not have used a system of centuries and tribes for
voting (if it even had elections back then) because it would not have
needed that kind of system for so small a population.

 
Paulla Corva
If we go back to such a time, we only have gens or clans, acting in concert.  Dio of Halic. in "Antiquities" seems to indicate that voting was done by acclimation in each clan.  The Tribes, likely are the "modern" represenitive of these Clans.  The Centuries of course are the 100 men units of ten tent groups (files) ten ranks deep.  The early Roman moblizations are based on this.
 
If you are drawing the comparison of our 1000 with Dios' 1000, there is none.
They were all together, we are scattered around the world.  One man, one vote was not the Roman way, and as cumbersome as our procedure is, I'd rather keep it.
 
Q. Fabius Maximus


Stay up to date on the latest news - from sports scores to stocks and so much more.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60917 From: marcushoratius Date: 2009-02-05
Subject: NONAE FEBRUARIAE: Concordia
M. Moravius Piscinus Quiritibus et omnibus salutem plurimam dicit:
Diis bene iuvantibus sumus.

Hodie est Nonae Februariae; haec dies nefastus est: Faunalia rustica
et Concordiae

"When the middle parts of Aquarius begin to rise, windy weather
begins." ~ Columella, De Re Rustica 9.2.14

AUC 535 / 218 BCE: L. Manilius, who vowed the temple earlier this
year while putting down a mutiny in Cisalpine Gaul, dedicated the
Temple of Concordia.


AUC 707 / 46 BCE: Following the victory of Caesar at Thapsus, M.
Porcius Cato Uticensis took his own life, a martyr for his Republican
ideals.

"The battle was long, severe, and doubtful in all parts of the field
until toward evening, when victory declared itself on the side of
Caesar, who went straight on and captured Scipio's camp and did not
desist, even in the night, from reaping the fruits of his victory
until he had made a clean sweep. The enemy scattered in small bodies
wherever they could. Scipio himself, abandoning everything to
Afranius, fled by sea with twelve open ships.

"When these facts became known at Utica some three days later, and as
Caesar was marching right against that place, a general flight began.
Cato did not detain anybody. He gave ships to all the nobility who
asked for them, but himself adhered firmly to his post. When the
inhabitants of Utica promised to intercede for him before doing so
for themselves, he answered with a smile that he did not need any
intercessors with Caesar, and that Caesar knew it very well. Then he
placed his seal on all the public property and gave the accounts of
each kind to the magistrates of Utica. Toward evening he bathed and
dined. He ate in a sitting posture,39 as had been his custom since
Pompey's p409death. He changed his habits in no respect. He partook
of the dinner, neither more nor less than usual. He conversed with
the others present concerning those who had sailed away and
inquiredwhether the wind was favourable and whether they would make
sufficient distance before Caesar should arrive the next morning. Nor
did he alter any of his habits when he retired to rest, except that
he embraced his son rather more affectionately than usual. As he did
not find his dirk in its accustomed place by his couch, he exclaimed
that he had been betrayed by his servants to the enemy. "What
weapon," he asked, "shall I use if I am attacked in the night?" When
they besought him to do no violence to himself but to go to sleep
without his dirk, he replied still more plausibly, "Could I not
strangle myself with my clothing if I wished to, or knock my brains
out against the wall, or throw myself headlong to the ground, or
destroy myself by holding my breath?" Much more he said to the same
purport until he persuaded them to bring back his dirk. When it had
been put in its place he called for Plato's treatise on the soul and
began to read.

"When Plato's dialogue had come to an end and when he thought that
those who were stationed at the doors were asleep, he stabbed himself
under the breast. His intestines protruded and the attendants heard a
groan and rushed in. Physicians replaced his intestines, which were
still uninjured, in his body, and after sewing up the wound tied a
bandage around it. When Cato came to himself he dissembled again.
Although he blamed himself for the insufficiency of the wound, he
expressed thanks p411to those who had saved him and said that he only
needed sleep. The attendants then retired, taking the dirk with them,
and closed the door, thinking that he had become quiet. Cato after
feigning sleep, tore off the bandage with his hands without making
any noise, opened the suture of the wound, enlarged it with his nails
like a wild beast, plunged his fingers into his stomach, and tore out
his entrails until he died, being then about fifty years of age. He
was considered the most steadfast of all men in upholding any opinion
that he had once espoused and in adhering to justice, rectitude, and
morality, not as a matter of custom merely, but rather from a high-
souled philosophy." ~ Appian, The Civil Wars, Excerpts 2.97-99


AUC 751 / 2 BCE: Augustus received the title Pater Patria:

"Sacred Father of the Fatherland, this title has been conferred on
you, (Augustus), by the Senate, by the people, and by we Equites.
Events had already granted it. Tardily you received your true title,
you had long been Father of the World." ~ Ovidius Naso, Fasti 2.127-
128

"In my thirtieth consulship the Senate, the equestrian order, and the
whole of the People of Rome titled me Pater Patriae. [Furthermore the
title was to be] inscribed in the vestibule of my house and in the
Curia Julia and in the Forum Augustum beneath the chariot which has
been put there in my honor by decree of the Senate." ~ Augustus, Res
Gestae 35.1


AUC 965 / 212 CE: Failure to bring Concord between Caracella and his
brother Geta

"As for his own brother, Antoninus (Caracella) had wished to slay
(Geta) even while his father (Septimus Severus) was yet alive, but
had been unable to do so at the time because of Severus, or later, on
the march, because of the legions; for the troops felt very kindly
toward the younger brother, especially as he resembled his father
very closely in appearance. But when Antoninus got back to Rome, he
made away with him also. The two pretended to love and commend each
other, but in all that they did they were diametrically opposed, and
anyone could see that omething terrible was bound to result from the
situation. This was foreseen even before they reached Rome. For when
the senate had voted that sacrifices should be offered on behalf of
their concord both to the other Gods and to Concord herself, and the
assistants had got ready the victim to be sacrificed to Concord and
the consul had arrived to superintend the sacrifice, neither he could
find them nor they him, but they spent nearly the entire night in
searching for one another, so that the sacrifice could not be
performed then. And on the next day two wolves went up on the
Capitol, but were chased away from there; one of them was found and
slain somewhere in the Forum and the other was killed later outside
the pomerium. This incident also had reference to the brothers." ~
Dio Cassius 78.1.3-6


Our thought for today is from Democritus, The Golden Sayings 28:

"It is good not only to refrain from doing an injury, but even from
the very wish."
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60918 From: Cn. Cornelius Lentulus Date: 2009-02-05
Subject: Concordia Ritual on the Day of the Temple of Concordia
Cn. Lentulus sacerdos Concordiae et pontifex Quiritibus sal.


This has been the sacrifice to Concordia on Her Temple's dedication day.

I offered milk and incense.


Favete linguis!

(beginning of the sacrifice.)

PRAEFATIO

Dea Concordia Populi Novi Romani Quiritium, te hoc ture commovendo bonas preces precor, uti sies volens propitia Populo Novo Romano Quiritibus, Reique Publicae Populi Novi Romani Quiritium, mihi, domo, familiae!

(Incense is placed in the focus of the altar.)

Dea Concordia Populi Novi Romani Quiritium, uti te ture commovendo bonas preces bene precatus sum, eiusdem rei ergo macte lacte esto!"

(Libation of milk is made.)

PRECATIO

Dea Concordia Populi Novi Romani Quiritium, hoc die templi Concordiae Augustae dedicationis te precor, veneror, quaeso, obtestor: uti pacem concordiamque constantem societati Novae Romae tribuas; utique Rem Publicam Populi Novi Romani Quiritium confirmes, augeas, adiuves, omnibusque discordiis liberes; utique Res Publica Populi Novi Romani Quiritium semper floreat, atque pax et concordia et gloria Novae Romae omni tempore crescat, utique Populo Novo Romano Quiritibus, Reique Publicae Populi Novi Romani Quiritium, mihi, domo, familiae omnes eventus bonos faustosque esse siris; utique sies volens propitia Populo Novo Romano Quiritibus, Reique Publicae Populi Novi Romani Quiritium, magistratibus, consulibus, praetoribus Populi Novi Romani Quiritium, tribunis Plebei Novae Romanae, Senatui Novo Romano, mihi, domo, familiae!

SACRIFICIUM

Sicut verba nuncupavi, quaeque ita faxis, uti ego me sentio dicere: harum rerum ergo macte hoc lacte libando, hoc ture ommovendo esto fito volens propitia Populo Novo Romano Quiritibus, Reique Publicae Populi Novi Romani Quiritium, magistratibus, consulibus, praetoribus Populi Novi Romani Quiritium, tribunis Plebei Novae Romanae, Senatui Novo Romano, mihi, domo, familiae!

(Libation of milk is made and incense is sacrificed.)

REDDITIO

Dea Concordia Populi Novi Romani Quiritium, uti te ture commovendo et lacte libando bonas preces bene precatus sum, earundem rerum ergo macte lacte esto!

(Libation of milk is made)

Ilicet!

(End of the sacrifice.)

PIACULUM

Iane, Dea Concordia Populi Novi Romani Quiritium, Concordia Novae Romae, Iuppiter Optime Maxmime, Iuno, Minerva, Omnes Di Immortales quocumque nomine: si quidquam vobis in hac caerimonia displicet, hoc vino inferio veniam peto et vitium meum expio.

(Libation of wine is made.)


Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus,
P O N T I F E X
SACERDOS CONCORDIAE
------------------------------------------
Legatus Pro Praetore Provinciae Pannoniae
Sacerdos Provinciae Pannoniae
Interpres Linguae Hungaricae
Accensus Consulum M. Curiatii Complutensis et M. Iulii Severi
Scriba Praetoris P. Memmii Albucii
Scriba Censorum Ti. Galerii Paulini et C. Popillii Laenatis
Scriba Aedilis Curulis Cn. Iulii Caesaris
Scriba Rogatricis A. Tulliae Scholasticae
Scriba Interpretis Linguae Latinae A. Tulliae Scholasticae
-------------------------------------------
Magister Sodalitatis Latinitatis
Dominus Factionis Russatae


Passa a Yahoo! Mail.

La webmail che ti offre GRATIS spazio illimitato,
antispam e messenger integrato.
http://it.mail.yahoo.com/%c2%a0%c2%a0%c2%a0%c2%a0%c2%a0%c2%a0%c2%a0%c2%a0%c2%a0%c2%a0%c2%a0%c2%a0%c2%a0%c2%a0
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60919 From: Rich Date: 2009-02-06
Subject: Curious non-member with some questions.
Greetings,

I have been considering joining Nova Roma for some time now, have been
observing this list for a while (more than a year, maybe two) and have
some questions:

1) I have noticed one or two references from people who are in both the
SCA, and Nova Roma. I once considered joining the SCA, but alas did
not. Is Nova Roma like the SCA in that there are local chapters and
occasional meetings? Although I have little interest in joining the
SCA, they do have a local Barony, and they do have local meetings.

2) When you talk of "Taxes" on this list, are you referring to a
membership fee for joining Nova Roma?

3) What are the benefits of membership? Is there anything other than
being a member of a community with fellow people who appreciate Roman
history and culture? Is there at the very least a membership
card? :-)

I'm sure more questions will come to me, but these are the obvious
ones.

Best Regards,
Rich...

P.S.
I already own a well made Toga.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60920 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2009-02-06
Subject: Re: Curious non-member with some questions.
Salve Rich,

Rich <wielgosz@...> asked:

> Is Nova Roma like the SCA in that there are local chapters and
> occasional meetings?

It varies quite a bit depending on where you are. We have places
where several Nova Romans live within driving distance of each other,
and there you'll find a pretty robust local community. In other
places we have lone people who are hundreds of miles from the next
nearest Nova Roman. In those places there isn't a whole lot of local
activity.

> When you talk of "Taxes" on this list, are you referring to a
> membership fee for joining Nova Roma?

Kind of. We're actually talking about a "premium membership fee."
Basic membership costs nothing, but if you want to participate in the
religio or the government, you need to be an assiduus, which is our
fancy latin name for a dues paying premium member.

> 3) What are the benefits of membership?

You get to participate in more stuff.

> Is there anything other than
> being a member of a community with fellow people who appreciate Roman
> history and culture?

Yes, there is. You also get to be a member of a community of people
who are dedicated to the resurgence of classical Roman virtues in the
modern world, and who are actively practicing the polytheistic
religion of the Romans. You don't have to be a polytheist yourself,
but you'll be joining a community of people who have created this
republic in order for it to be the state of our state religion.

> Is there at the very least a membership card? :-)

We can stick your name into a .pdf file of a fancy membership card and
send it to you, if you want one. You'll have to print it. As you may
have noticed, our taxes are very low. The way we keep them low is by
not spending tax revenues on things like postage.

Vale,

CN-EQVIT-MARINVS
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60921 From: Rich Date: 2009-02-06
Subject: Re: Curious non-member with some questions.
On Fri, 2009-02-06 at 16:40 -0500, Gnaeus Equitius Marinus wrote:

Greetings, and thank you for your response. As I suspected, I have
more questions. :-)

> It varies quite a bit depending on where you are. We have places
> where several Nova Romans live within driving distance of each other,
> and there you'll find a pretty robust local community. In other
> places we have lone people who are hundreds of miles from the next
> nearest Nova Roman. In those places there isn't a whole lot of local
> activity.

How would one find other local (to me) members, and what is the
population of Nova Roma?

> > When you talk of "Taxes" on this list, are you referring to a
> > membership fee for joining Nova Roma?
>
> Kind of. We're actually talking about a "premium membership fee."
> Basic membership costs nothing, but if you want to participate in the
> religio or the government, you need to be an assiduus, which is our
> fancy latin name for a dues paying premium member.

I see. And what are those taxes?

> > 3) What are the benefits of membership?
>
> You get to participate in more stuff.

Got it. To be honest participating in religio and government doesn't
interest me that much. I am more into learning more about Roman history
and culture.

> > Is there anything other than
> > being a member of a community with fellow people who appreciate
> Roman
> > history and culture?
>
> Yes, there is. You also get to be a member of a community of people
> who are dedicated to the resurgence of classical Roman virtues in the
> modern world, and who are actively practicing the polytheistic
> religion of the Romans. You don't have to be a polytheist yourself,
> but you'll be joining a community of people who have created this
> republic in order for it to be the state of our state religion.

That to me sounds like what I had imagined. It sounds as if Nova Roma
is a bit more loose-knit than the SCA, for example. They seem to have
more structure in terms of the social aspect. I would have interest in
social events with other Nova Romans. If I am wrong about this please
let me know.

I certainly like the idea of (some!) classical roman values, and try to
practice my life accordingly. But one needn't be a part of Nova Roma to
do that. I am actually an agnostic, so monotheism, polytheism... it's
all the same to me. Religion doesn't play much of a part in my real
life, so it probably wouldn't play much of a part in my Nova Roman life.

> > Is there at the very least a membership card? :-)
>
> We can stick your name into a .pdf file of a fancy membership card
> and
> send it to you, if you want one. You'll have to print it. As you may
> have noticed, our taxes are very low. The way we keep them low is by
> not spending tax revenues on things like postage.

Understood.

So there's no printed newsletter, either? ;-)

I guess at the end of the day, for myself, I am trying to see the
point in being a part of a community where due to where I live, there
might not be another member within proximity to me. In other words, if
I am isolated and far from other members, and there are no social
activities to attend, it probably doesn't hold that much interest for
me. If it is a community, I want it to feel like a community to me.

I know email is a bad way to communicate since you can't hear
inflection, or see body language, so please don't read this as being
negative. I'm just trying to understand where something like Nova Roma
would fit in for me.

Rich...
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60922 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2009-02-06
Subject: Re: Curious non-member with some questions.
Salve Rich,

Rich <wielgosz@...> asked:

> How would one find other local (to me) members,

You could look up our provinces on our website at
http://www.novaroma.org or you could just tell me where you live and I
could give you a rough estimate of how many of our people live near you.

> and what is the population of Nova Roma?

Around 2000 total. About 250 or so of those are assidui.

> And what are those taxes?

Depends on where you live. The tax rate is 1/3000 per capita GDP for
the country you live in. If you're in the United States, that works
out to $16 this year.

> To be honest participating in religio and government doesn't
> interest me that much. I am more into learning more about Roman history
> and culture.

OK. You might want to look into our various sodalites (those are
interest groups). You can read about them at the website too.

> So there's no printed newsletter, either? ;-)

Not at the moment. We used to have one, and the cost of producing it
ate up a lot of our funds. So now we have an electronic newsletter
that gets posted as a .pdf.

Please let me know if there's anything else you'd like to know about
Nova Roma.

Vale,

CN-EQVIT-MARINVS
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60923 From: Titus Annaeus Regulus Date: 2009-02-06
Subject: Re: Curious non-member with some questions.
On Fri, 2009-02-06 at 16:40 -0500, Gnaeus Equitius Marinus wrote:

Greetings, and thank you for your response. As I suspected, I have
more questions. :-)
 
Regulus: This is good. We love people who are interested in Rome or Nova Roma.

> It varies quite a bit
depending on where you are. We have places
> where several Nova Romans
live within driving distance of each other,
> and there you'll find a
pretty robust local community. In other
> places we have lone people who
are hundreds of miles from the next
> nearest Nova Roman. In those places
there isn't a whole lot of local
> activity.

How would one find other local (to me) members, and what is the
population of Nova Roma?
Regulus: Nova Roma is divided into provinces. Provinces have their own page on the Nova Roma website as well as provincial mailing lists and provincial governors. I suggest you go to the province relevant to you and get in touch with the provincial group. The list of provinces can be found here.
 

> > When you talk of "Taxes" on this list, are you referring to
a
> > membership fee for joining Nova Roma?
>
> Kind of.
We're actually talking about a "premium membership fee."
> Basic
membership costs nothing, but if you want to participate in the
> religio
or the government, you need to be an assiduus, which is our
> fancy latin
name for a dues paying premium member.

I see. And what are those taxes?
 
Regulus: It varies from province to province depending on average income in that area, however they are typically quite low. A full list can be found here.

> > 3) What are the benefits of membership?
>
> You get to
participate in more stuff.

Got it. To be honest participating in religio and government doesn't
interest me that much. I am more into learning more about Roman history
and culture.
 
Regulus: While it is by no means required, the modest amount required to become assiduus is worth consideration. At the very least it helps support Nova Roma offer the things that you are interested in participating in.

> > Is there anything other
than
> > being a member of a community with fellow people who
appreciate
> Roman
> > history and culture?
>
> Yes,
there is. You also get to be a member of a community of people
> who are
dedicated to the resurgence of classical Roman virtues in the
> modern
world, and who are actively practicing the polytheistic
> religion of the
Romans. You don't have to be a polytheist yourself,
> but you'll be
joining a community of people who have created this
> republic in order
for it to be the state of our state religion.

That to me sounds like what I had imagined. It sounds as if Nova Roma
is a bit more loose-knit than the SCA, for example. They seem to have
more structure in terms of the social aspect. I would have interest in
social events with other Nova Romans. If I am wrong about this please
let me know.

I certainly like the idea of (some!) classical roman values, and try to
practice my life accordingly. But one needn't be a part of Nova Roma to
do that. I am actually an agnostic, so monotheism, polytheism.. . it's
all the same to me. Religion doesn't play much of a part in my real
life, so it probably wouldn't play much of a part in my Nova Roman life.
 
Regulus: I also am not a practitioner of the state cult. All the same, I enjoy the cultural aspects of Ancient Rome and find this is an excellent place to meet likeminded individuals. In terms of social activities, we do have a conventus regularly (though this is not a casual event), but these can involve a fair amount of travel. It really depends on the presence of other citizens in your area. If there are many neighboring citizens, you will have more social events.

> > Is there at the very
least a membership card? :-)
>
> We can stick your name into a .pdf
file of a fancy membership card
> and
> send it to you, if you want
one. You'll have to print it. As you may
> have noticed, our taxes are
very low. The way we keep them low is by
> not spending tax revenues on
things like postage.

Understood.

So there's no printed newsletter, either? ;-)
 
Regulus: Have a look at this list for some information on Nova Roma's publications.

I guess at the end of the day, for myself, I am trying to see the
point in being a part of a community where due to where I live, there
might not be another member within proximity to me. In other words, if
I am isolated and far from other members, and there are no social
activities to attend, it probably doesn't hold that much interest for
me. If it is a community, I want it to feel like a community to me.
 
Regulus: I am also in a fairly remote location (look up Newfoundland on Google Maps and you will see what I mean) but I can guarantee that if you are interested in getting involved there are plenty of opportunities to participate. Due to the fact that Nova Roma is a Republic, many citizens feel not only entitled but obliged to share their opinion on a wide range of things. Also we have several initiatives in the works to increase face-to-face interactions between citizens. A search around the Nova Roma website would provide you with more details if you are curious to know more.

I know email is a bad way to communicate since you can't hear
inflection, or see body language, so please don't read this as being
negative. I'm just trying to understand where something like Nova Roma
would fit in for me.
 
Regulus: It is free to join. You need not participate anymore than you wish. There is nothing to be lost should you not find Nova Roma something you're interested in being involved with. I suggest you get involved and give it a try. If not, feel free to continue to hang around. =)

Rich...
 
Vale,
Titus Annaeus Regulus

From: Rich
Sent: Friday, February 06, 2009 6:46 PM
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Curious non-member with some questions.

On Fri, 2009-02-06 at 16:40 -0500, Gnaeus Equitius Marinus wrote:

Greetings, and thank you for your response. As I suspected, I have
more questions. :-)

> It varies quite a bit depending on where
you are. We have places
> where several Nova Romans live within driving
distance of each other,
> and there you'll find a pretty robust local
community. In other
> places we have lone people who are hundreds of
miles from the next
> nearest Nova Roman. In those places there isn't a
whole lot of local
> activity.

How would one find other local (to me) members, and what is the
population of Nova Roma?

> > When
you talk of "Taxes" on this list, are you referring to a
> > membership
fee for joining Nova Roma?
>
> Kind of. We're actually talking
about a "premium membership fee."
> Basic membership costs nothing, but
if you want to participate in the
> religio or the government, you need
to be an assiduus, which is our
> fancy latin name for a dues paying
premium member.

I see. And what are those taxes?

> > 3) What
are the benefits of membership?
>
> You get to participate in more
stuff.

Got it. To be honest participating in religio and government doesn't
interest me that much. I am more into learning more about Roman history
and culture.

> > Is there anything other than
> > being a member of a community with fellow people who appreciate
>
Roman
> > history and culture?
>
> Yes, there is. You also
get to be a member of a community of people
> who are dedicated to the
resurgence of classical Roman virtues in the
> modern world, and who are
actively practicing the polytheistic
> religion of the Romans. You don't
have to be a polytheist yourself,
> but you'll be joining a community of
people who have created this
> republic in order for it to be the state
of our state religion.

That to me sounds like what I had imagined. It sounds as if Nova Roma
is a bit more loose-knit than the SCA, for example. They seem to have
more structure in terms of the social aspect. I would have interest in
social events with other Nova Romans. If I am wrong about this please
let me know.

I certainly like the idea of (some!) classical roman values, and try to
practice my life accordingly. But one needn't be a part of Nova Roma to
do that. I am actually an agnostic, so monotheism, polytheism.. . it's
all the same to me. Religion doesn't play much of a part in my real
life, so it probably wouldn't play much of a part in my Nova Roman life.

> > Is there at the very least a membership card?
:-)
>
> We can stick your name into a .pdf file of a fancy
membership card
> and
> send it to you, if you want one. You'll
have to print it. As you may
> have noticed, our taxes are very low. The
way we keep them low is by
> not spending tax revenues on things like
postage.

Understood.

So there's no printed newsletter, either? ;-)

I guess at the end of the day, for myself, I am trying to see the
point in being a part of a community where due to where I live, there
might not be another member within proximity to me. In other words, if
I am isolated and far from other members, and there are no social
activities to attend, it probably doesn't hold that much interest for
me. If it is a community, I want it to feel like a community to me.

I know email is a bad way to communicate since you can't hear
inflection, or see body language, so please don't read this as being
negative. I'm just trying to understand where something like Nova Roma
would fit in for me.

Rich...

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60924 From: Rich Date: 2009-02-06
Subject: Re: Curious non-member with some questions.
On Fri, 2009-02-06 at 19:46 -0330, Titus Annaeus Regulus wrote:

> On Fri, 2009-02-06 at 16:40 -0500, Gnaeus Equitius Marinus wrote:
>
> Greetings, and thank you for your response. As I suspected, I have
> more questions. :-)
>
> Regulus: This is good. We love people who are interested in Rome or
> Nova Roma.

Excellent.

> How would one find other local (to me) members, and what is the
> population of Nova Roma?
>
> Regulus: Nova Roma is divided into provinces. Provinces have their own
> page on the Nova Roma website as well as provincial mailing lists and
> provincial governors. I suggest you go to the province relevant to you
> and get in touch with the provincial group. The list of provinces can
> be found here.

It doesn't look like there are is a province that includes NY State.
I live near Syracuse.

> I see. And what are those taxes?
>
> Regulus: It varies from province to province depending on average
> income in that area, however they are typically quite low. A full list
> can be found here.

Reasonable.

> Got it. To be honest participating in religio and government doesn't
> interest me that much. I am more into learning more about Roman
> history and culture.
>
> Regulus: While it is by no means required, the modest amount required
> to become assiduus is worth consideration. At the very least it helps
> support Nova Roma offer the things that you are interested in
> participating in.

That is a fair response. I agree completely.

> That to me sounds like what I had imagined. It sounds as if Nova Roma
> is a bit more loose-knit than the SCA, for example. They seem to have
> more structure in terms of the social aspect. I would have interest in
> social events with other Nova Romans. If I am wrong about this please
> let me know.
>
> I certainly like the idea of (some!) classical roman values, and try
> to
> practice my life accordingly. But one needn't be a part of Nova Roma
> to
> do that. I am actually an agnostic, so monotheism, polytheism... it's
> all the same to me. Religion doesn't play much of a part in my real
> life, so it probably wouldn't play much of a part in my Nova Roman
> life.
>
> Regulus: I also am not a practitioner of the state cult. All the same,
> I enjoy the cultural aspects of Ancient Rome and find this is an
> excellent place to meet likeminded individuals. In terms of social
> activities, we do have a conventus regularly (though this is not a
> casual event), but these can involve a fair amount of travel. It
> really depends on the presence of other citizens in your area. If
> there are many neighboring citizens, you will have more social events.

I fear there are no citizens near to me.

> Understood.
>
> So there's no printed newsletter, either? ;-)
>
> Regulus: Have a look at this list for some information on Nova Roma's
> publications.
>
> I guess at the end of the day, for myself, I am trying to see the
> point in being a part of a community where due to where I live, there
> might not be another member within proximity to me. In other words, if
> I am isolated and far from other members, and there are no social
> activities to attend, it probably doesn't hold that much interest for
> me. If it is a community, I want it to feel like a community to me.
>
> Regulus: I am also in a fairly remote location (look up Newfoundland
> on Google Maps and you will see what I mean) but I can guarantee that
> if you are interested in getting involved there are plenty of
> opportunities to participate. Due to the fact that Nova Roma is a
> Republic, many citizens feel not only entitled but obliged to share
> their opinion on a wide range of things. Also we have several
> initiatives in the works to increase face-to-face interactions between
> citizens. A search around the Nova Roma website would provide you with
> more details if you are curious to know more.

I have found the website to be less than intuitive.

As for Newfoundland, I have been there. Back in the 90's my friends
and I spent two weeks visiting. We got off the ferry in Port Aux Basque
and drove up to a little town called Rocky Harbor, and rented a cabin
and spent some time in Gros Morne National Park, then we drove around to
various places. I remember Gander and Cornerbrook quite well, as well
as a little town in the north called Twilingate, and of course the
capital, St. Johns , as well.

Would love to go back.

> I know email is a bad way to communicate since you can't hear
> inflection, or see body language, so please don't read this as being
> negative. I'm just trying to understand where something like Nova Roma
> would fit in for me.
>
> Regulus: It is free to join. You need not participate anymore than you
> wish. There is nothing to be lost should you not find Nova Roma
> something you're interested in being involved with. I suggest you get
> involved and give it a try. If not, feel free to continue to hang
> around. =)

Yes, thank you. I've been trying to choose a good name. I'm still
undecided on that.

Rich...
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60925 From: Rich Date: 2009-02-06
Subject: Re: Curious non-member with some questions.
On Fri, 2009-02-06 at 18:10 -0500, Gnaeus Equitius Marinus wrote:

Salve,

> > How would one find other local (to me) members,
>
> You could look up our provinces on our website at
> http://www.novaroma.org or you could just tell me where you live and
> I
> could give you a rough estimate of how many of our people live near
> you.

I live east of Syracuse NY. That's the biggest population center
nearest to me.

> > and what is the population of Nova Roma?
>
> Around 2000 total. About 250 or so of those are assidui.

Wow. I had thought it would have been more people. I was expecting
10,000 or so, world wide.

> > And what are those taxes?
>
> Depends on where you live. The tax rate is 1/3000 per capita GDP for
> the country you live in. If you're in the United States, that works
> out to $16 this year.

A pittance.

> OK. You might want to look into our various sodalites (those are
> interest groups). You can read about them at the website too.

Sounds good.

I have communicated with a few people off list, actually. I produce a
podcast and thought I might like to get involved with a podcast produced
by Nova Romans. That collaboration hasn't happened yet.

> > So there's no printed newsletter, either? ;-)
>
> Not at the moment. We used to have one, and the cost of producing it
> ate up a lot of our funds. So now we have an electronic newsletter
> that gets posted as a .pdf.
>
> Please let me know if there's anything else you'd like to know about
> Nova Roma.

Thank you so much for answering the questions I've had.

Best,
Rich....
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60926 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2009-02-07
Subject: Re: Curious non-member with some questions.
Salve Rich,

Rich <wielgosz@...> writes:

> I live east of Syracuse NY. That's the biggest population center
> nearest to me.

Yeah, we're a bit thin on the ground up that way. I think our closest
active citizen to you would be A. Tullia Scholastica, who lives over
near Buffalo. I know that's a few hours to the west from Syracuse.
New York is part of our Mediatlantica provincia, which extends from
the Canadian border south through Virginia to the northern border of
North Carolina. I was the provincial governor for several years, and
it is indeed huge. We have a pretty big concentration of people in
the greater Washington DC area, and another fairly good sized bunch in
the greater NYC area, but not many in upstate New York.

Vale,

CN-EQVIT-MARINVS
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60927 From: Rich Date: 2009-02-07
Subject: Re: Curious non-member with some questions.
On Sat, 2009-02-07 at 00:08 -0500, Gnaeus Equitius Marinus wrote:

Salve,

I have definitely seen A. Tullia Scholastica's name on this list, many
times. Buffalo is about three hours west of me. Not a short trip at
all.

I'm actually surprised that it's thin up this way. We have a lot of
people who are involved in many things like this (SCA, Civil War
re-enactors, etc...), so it's a bit disappointing.

Although I will be visiting a friend in Washington DC in the
not-too-distant future. Maybe I could hook up with some of them when
I'm down there.

Time for bed.

Best,
Rich...

> > I live east of Syracuse NY. That's the biggest population center
> > nearest to me.
>
> Yeah, we're a bit thin on the ground up that way. I think our closest
> active citizen to you would be A. Tullia Scholastica, who lives over
> near Buffalo. I know that's a few hours to the west from Syracuse.
> New York is part of our Mediatlantica provincia, which extends from
> the Canadian border south through Virginia to the northern border of
> North Carolina. I was the provincial governor for several years, and
> it is indeed huge. We have a pretty big concentration of people in
> the greater Washington DC area, and another fairly good sized bunch
> in
> the greater NYC area, but not many in upstate New York.
>
> Vale,
>
> CN-EQVIT-MARINVS
>
>
>
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60928 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2009-02-07
Subject: Re: Curious non-member with some questions.
Re: [Nova-Roma] Curious non-member with some questions.
A. Tullia Scholastica Richardo quiritibus, sociis, peregrinisque bonae voluntatis S.P.D.
 

On Fri, 2009-02-06 at 19:46 -0330, Titus Annaeus Regulus wrote:

> On Fri, 2009-02-06 at 16:40 -0500, Gnaeus Equitius Marinus wrote:
>
> Greetings, and thank you for your response. As I suspected, I have
> more questions. :-)
>  
> Regulus: This is good. We love people who are interested in Rome or
> Nova Roma.

Excellent.

> How would one find other local (to me) members, and what is the
> population of Nova Roma?
>
> Regulus: Nova Roma is divided into provinces. Provinces have their own
> page on the Nova Roma website as well as provincial mailing lists and
> provincial governors. I suggest you go to the province relevant to you
> and get in touch with the provincial group. The list of provinces can
> be found here.

It doesn't look like there are is a province that includes NY State.
I live near Syracuse.

    ATS:  NY State is in Mediatlantica Province, which is numerically one of our largest provinces.  I live about 130 miles [?] west of you down the Thruway, NE of Buffalo.   I am the only active citizen in my immediate area, but it hasn’t stopped me from participating...or running for office, or teaching Latin, all of which I do.  There are a good many NR citizens in the NYC/Newark area (the latter includes one of our best cooks of Roman and other foods).  There are also many NR citizens in the DC metropolitan area (in Mediatlantica as well), some of whom more or less host a huge reenactment event every year.  This year we are looking at late September at George Mason University in Virginia.  I think there were around six legions present last year, as well as our civilian contingent and others.  Sometimes we also have provincial dinners; a recent one was held in Maryland, and we have had them in NYC.  The southern contingent is also plotting (sort of) a trip to a museum to view a/the Pompeii exhibit.  Sound interesting to you?  

> I see. And what are those taxes?
>  
> Regulus: It varies from province to province depending on average
> income in that area, however they are typically quite low. A full list
> can be found here.

Reasonable.

> Got it. To be honest participating in religio and government doesn't
> interest me that much. I am more into learning more about Roman
> history and culture.

    ATS:  We have SIGs, called sodalities, which deal with Latin, cooking, the Roman military, and the arts, to name a few.  There are also other mailing lists for assorted interests.  
>  
> Regulus: While it is by no means required, the modest amount required
> to become assiduus is worth consideration. At the very least it helps
> support Nova Roma offer the things that you are interested in
> participating in.

That is a fair response.  I agree completely.

> That to me sounds like what I had imagined. It sounds as if Nova Roma
> is a bit more loose-knit than the SCA, for example. They seem to have
> more structure in terms of the social aspect. I would have interest in
> social events with other Nova Romans. If I am wrong about this please
> let me know.
>
> I certainly like the idea of (some!) classical roman values, and try
> to
> practice my life accordingly. But one needn't be a part of Nova Roma
> to
> do that. I am actually an agnostic, so monotheism, polytheism... it's
> all the same to me. Religion doesn't play much of a part in my real
> life, so it probably wouldn't play much of a part in my Nova Roman
> life.
>  
> Regulus: I also am not a practitioner of the state cult. All the same,
> I enjoy the cultural aspects of Ancient Rome and find this is an
> excellent place to meet likeminded individuals. In terms of social
> activities, we do have a conventus regularly (though this is not a
> casual event), but these can involve a fair amount of travel. It
> really depends on the presence of other citizens in your area. If
> there are many neighboring citizens, you will have more social events.

I fear there are no citizens near to me.

    ATS:  There used to be a legionary vexillation somewhere near Syracuse.  In any case, I’m just down the T-way.  There are/were a couple of other citizens here, but they are inactive, and I think there are/were some in the southern tier.  Some areas have what we call municipia and/or oppida, that is, local groups of specified sizes which have their own government within NR.  Recently one was established in the Phoenix area, and another around Edmonton, if memory serves.  Some of us are contemplating establishing a colony, and central NY has some advantages for that.  We may look into this later...you know, when the snow melts.  

    I am more interested in philosophy than religion; there is a list for the Roman virtues, in case you are interested.  It’s quiet most of the time, but does have bursts of activity.  

> Understood.
>
> So there's no printed newsletter, either? ;-)
>  
> Regulus: Have a look at this list for some information on Nova Roma's
> publications.
>
> I guess at the end of the day, for myself, I am trying to see the
> point in being a part of a community where due to where I live, there
> might not be another member within proximity to me. In other words, if
> I am isolated and far from other members, and there are no social
> activities to attend, it probably doesn't hold that much interest for
> me. If it is a community, I want it to feel like a community to me.
>  
> Regulus: I am also in a fairly remote location (look up Newfoundland
> on Google Maps and you will see what I mean) but I can guarantee that
> if you are interested in getting involved there are plenty of
> opportunities to participate. Due to the fact that Nova Roma is a
> Republic, many citizens feel not only entitled but obliged to share
> their opinion on a wide range of things. Also we have several
> initiatives in the works to increase face-to-face interactions between
> citizens. A search around the Nova Roma website would provide you with
> more details if you are curious to know more.

I have found the website to be less than intuitive.

    ATS:  It might be intuitive to some; we have citizens from all over the world and all walks of life.  Russia, Australia, Japan, Singapore, Romania, Hungary, Canada, Mexico, India, the US, several countries in South America, some in Africa, just about all of them in Western Europe (England, Ireland, France, Germany, Spain, Portugal, Italy)...
    

As for Newfoundland, I have been there.  Back in the 90's my friends
and I spent two weeks visiting.  We got off the ferry in Port Aux Basque
and drove up to a little town called Rocky Harbor, and rented a cabin
and spent some time in Gros Morne National Park, then we drove around to
various places.  I remember Gander and Cornerbrook quite well, as well
as a little town in the north called Twilingate, and of course the
capital, St. Johns , as well.

Would love to go back.

> I know email is a bad way to communicate since you can't hear
> inflection, or see body language, so please don't read this as being
> negative. I'm just trying to understand where something like Nova Roma
> would fit in for me.
>  
> Regulus: It is free to join. You need not participate anymore than you
> wish. There is nothing to be lost should you not find Nova Roma
> something you're interested in being involved with. I suggest you get
> involved and give it a try. If not, feel free to continue to hang
> around. =)

Yes, thank you.  I've been trying to choose a good name.  I'm still
undecided on that.

    ATS:  There is this page on Roman nomenclature on our website, and any of us in the censorial office would be glad to help.  

Rich...

  Vale, et valete.
      

  
  Messages in this topic           <http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma/message/60919
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60929 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2009-02-07
Subject: Re: Curious non-member with some questions.
Re: [Nova-Roma] Curious non-member with some questions.
A. Tullia Scholastica iterum Richardo quiritibus, sociis, peregrinisque bonae voluntatis S.P.D.
 

On Fri, 2009-02-06 at 18:10 -0500, Gnaeus Equitius Marinus wrote:

Salve,

> > How would one find other local (to me) members,
>
> You could look up our provinces on our website at
> http://www.novaroma.org or you could just tell me where you live and
> I
> could give you a rough estimate of how many of our people live near
> you.

I live east of Syracuse NY.  That's the biggest population center
nearest to me.

    Scholastica:  and there may be some citizens around there, too, though NYC is a better bet.  As earlier, I’m here too, not ALL that far away.  

> > and what is the population of Nova Roma?
>
> Around 2000 total. About 250 or so of those are assidui.

Wow. I had thought it would have been more people.  I was expecting
10,000 or so, world wide.

    Scholastica:  We have been in existence for just over ten years.  The SCA has been around longer, and   seems to appeal to a larger audience.  We feel that it is better to have more members who are at least marginally active than a lot of them who are there in name only, and don’t even respond to our biennial census.  

> > And what are those taxes?
>
> Depends on where you live. The tax rate is 1/3000 per capita GDP for
> the country you live in. If you're in the United States, that works
> out to $16 this year.

A pittance.

> OK. You might want to look into our various sodalites (those are
> interest groups). You can read about them at the website too.

Sounds good.

I have communicated with a few people off list, actually.  I produce a
podcast and thought I might like to get involved with a podcast produced
by Nova Romans.  That collaboration hasn't happened yet.

    Scholastica:  Nor is it likely.  The producer is in grad school, and the technical person is busy with two little preschool kids and a lot of other things, including a broken server for the Academia Thules, which has been our educational arm, so to speak, though it is technically unrelated to NR.  There are other issues there as well.  

> > So there's no printed newsletter, either? ;-)
>
> Not at the moment. We used to have one, and the cost of producing it
> ate up a lot of our funds. So now we have an electronic newsletter
> that gets posted as a .pdf.
>
> Please let me know if there's anything else you'd like to know about
> Nova Roma.

Thank you so much for answering the questions I've had.

Best,
 Rich....

Vale, et valete.  

  
      

  
   Messages in this topic           <http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma/message/60919
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60930 From: marcushoratius Date: 2009-02-07
Subject: a. d. VII Eidus Februariae: The Trial of Milo
M. Moravius Piscinus Quiritibus et omnibus salutem plurimam dicit:
Diis bene iuvantibus simus.

Hodie est ante diem VII Eidus Februariae; haec dies nefastus est:

"The star of Callisto sets, and Favonius winds begin to blow,
bringing warmer weather." ~ Columella 9.2.15

"Arrival of Favonius, the westerly winds, that begins the spring and
opens the earth; it is moderately cool, but healthy." ~ Pliny Nat.
Hist. 18.77

AUC 696 / 57 BCE: Trial of Milo continues.

"On the 7th of February Milo appeared. Pompey spoke, or rather wished
to speak. For as soon as he got up Clodius's ruffians raised a shout,
and throughout his whole speech he was interrupted, not only by
hostile cries, but by personal abuse and insulting remarks. However,
when he had finished his speech--for he shewed great courage in these
circumstances, he was not cowed, he said all he had to say, and at
times had by his Commanding presence even secured silence for his
words --well, when he had finished, up got Clodius. Our party
received him with such a shout--for they had determined to pay him
out--that he lost all presence of mind, power of speech, or control
over his countenance. This went on up to two o'clock-Pompey having
finished his speech at noon --and every kind of abuse, and finally
epigrams of the most outspoken indecency were uttered against Clodius
and Clodia. Mad and livid with rage Clodius, in the very midst of the
shouting, kept putting questions to his claque: "Who was it who was
starving the commons to death?" His ruffians answered, "Pompey." "Who
wanted to be sent to Alexandria?" They answered, "Pompey." "Who did
they wish to go?" They answered, "Crassus." The latter was present at
the time with no friendly feelings to Milo. About three o'clock, as
though at a given signal, the Clodians began spitting at our men.
There was an outburst of rage. They began a movement for forcing us
from our ground. Our men charged: his ruffians turned tail. Clodius
was pushed off the rostra: and then we too made our escape for fear
of mischief in the riot. The senate was summoned into the Curia:
Pompey went home. However, I did not myself enter the senate-house,
lest I should be obliged either to refrain from speaking on matters
of such gravity, or in defending Pompey (for he was being attacked by
Bibulus, Curio, Favonius, and Servilius the younger) should give
offence to the loyalists. The business was adjourned to the next day.
Clodius fixed the Quirinalia (17th of February) for his prosecution."
~ M. Tullius Cicero, Epist. Ad Quintum, 2.3


Today's thought comes from Marcus Aureliaus, Meditations 5.18

"Nothing happens to any man which he is not formed by nature to bear.
The same things happen to another, and either because he does not see
that they have happened or because he would show a great spirit he is
firm and remains unharmed. It is a shame then that ignorance and
conceit should be stronger than wisdom."
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60931 From: Rich Date: 2009-02-07
Subject: Re: Curious non-member with some questions.
On Sat, 2009-02-07 at 00:57 -0500, A. Tullia Scholastica wrote:

> I live east of Syracuse NY. That's the biggest population
> center
> nearest to me.
>
> Scholastica: and there may be some citizens around there,
> too, though NYC is a better bet. As earlier, I’m here too,
> not ALL that far away.

Absolutely. But two people do not exactly make for the kind of social
event I was imagining. :-)

> I have communicated with a few people off list, actually. I
> produce a
> podcast and thought I might like to get involved with a
> podcast produced
> by Nova Romans. That collaboration hasn't happened yet.
>
> Scholastica: Nor is it likely. The producer is in grad
> school, and the technical person is busy with two little
> preschool kids and a lot of other things, including a broken
> server for the Academia Thules, which has been our educational
> arm, so to speak, though it is technically unrelated to NR.
> There are other issues there as well.

Well, I'm too busy with my podcast to get involved in the production
of another at this time, anyway. Although an OFFICIAL Nova Roma podcast
sounds like a great way to increase membership.

Regards,
Rich...
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60932 From: Publia Aemilia Scaeva Date: 2009-02-07
Subject: OT to ATS: did this work? was: Re: [Nova-Roma] Curious non-member wi
Salve Scholastica,

good to read your message on this list! I dropped you a private email on Jan
22 to which you never responded. Did you receive it?

Vale bene!

P. Aemilia Scaeva
--
SOLES·OCCIDERE·ET·REDIRE·POSSVNT
NOBIS·CVM·SEMEL·OCCIDIT·BREVIS·LVX
NOX·EST·PERPETVA·VNA·DORMIENDA
C·VALERIVS·CATVLLVS
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60933 From: Maior Date: 2009-02-07
Subject: Re: Curious non-member with some questions.
SaIve Ricarde;
I'm M. Hortensia Maior producer of Vox Romana podcast, actually
Saturninus wrote to me not too long ago about the next podcast, but I
was super busy. If you are interested please write to me. I would like
to see another one go out.

As for just 2 people, I live in Chapel Hill, NC near Duke with 2 big
classics dept and I was the only Nova Roman here. But I met new civis
M. Aelia Connonia and then this last summer Q. Caelia Laeta who
joined. Yes we're two but now we meet and study and try to speak Latin
together, discuss NR and we're thinking of celebrating maybe the
Floralia and having a big party making Roman food and putting up a
poster at these departments...So you see you can recruit.

Nova Roma is a culture its not the SCA at all.There is no fantasy in
what we're doing..
If you ignore politics,religio, etc you're missing out on being
fully Roman on interacting as a 21st century Roman. We are not RPG we
re the rebirth the revival of Roman culture, Roman values in the 21st
century. It's a wholistic experience.
I hoped I've cleared things up for you. Do write, epistulum mihi scrivas
valeas
Maior


In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Rich <wielgosz@...> wrote:
>
> On Sat, 2009-02-07 at 00:57 -0500, A. Tullia Scholastica wrote:
>
> > I live east of Syracuse NY. That's the biggest population
> > center
> > nearest to me.
> >
> > Scholastica: and there may be some citizens around there,
> > too, though NYC is a better bet. As earlier, I’m here too,
> > not ALL that far away.
>
> Absolutely. But two people do not exactly make for the kind of social
> event I was imagining. :-)
>
> > I have communicated with a few people off list, actually. I
> > produce a
> > podcast and thought I might like to get involved with a
> > podcast produced
> > by Nova Romans. That collaboration hasn't happened yet.
> >
> > Scholastica: Nor is it likely. The producer is in grad
> > school, and the technical person is busy with two little
> > preschool kids and a lot of other things, including a broken
> > server for the Academia Thules, which has been our educational
> > arm, so to speak, though it is technically unrelated to NR.
> > There are other issues there as well.
>
> Well, I'm too busy with my podcast to get involved in the production
> of another at this time, anyway. Although an OFFICIAL Nova Roma podcast
> sounds like a great way to increase membership.
>
> Regards,
> Rich...
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60934 From: D. Aemilus Severus Date: 2009-02-07
Subject: Re: Curious non-member with some questions.
Salve Ricarde,
 
I live fairly close to you in Kingston, Ontario - which is roughly an hour or so away.  I am really not sure if there are any citizens near me as I too have struggled to find others to meet face-to-face.  I was figuring I would have to go to Toronto.  Like you said, the pair of us getting together over a beverage in Watertown may not be the social highlight of the Nova Roma calendar, but at least it would be a first step towards something not entirely web-based.
 
Vale,
 
D•ÆMILIVS•SEVERVS

On Sat, Feb 7, 2009 at 1:43 PM, Maior <rory12001@...> wrote:

SaIve Ricarde;
I'm M. Hortensia Maior producer of Vox Romana podcast, actually
Saturninus wrote to me not too long ago about the next podcast, but I
was super busy. If you are interested please write to me. I would like
to see another one go out.

As for just 2 people, I live in Chapel Hill, NC near Duke with 2 big
classics dept and I was the only Nova Roman here. But I met new civis
M. Aelia Connonia and then this last summer Q. Caelia Laeta who
joined. Yes we're two but now we meet and study and try to speak Latin
together, discuss NR and we're thinking of celebrating maybe the
Floralia and having a big party making Roman food and putting up a
poster at these departments...So you see you can recruit.

Nova Roma is a culture its not the SCA at all.There is no fantasy in
what we're doing..
If you ignore politics,religio, etc you're missing out on being
fully Roman on interacting as a 21st century Roman. We are not RPG we
re the rebirth the revival of Roman culture, Roman values in the 21st
century. It's a wholistic experience.
I hoped I've cleared things up for you. Do write, epistulum mihi scrivas
valeas
Maior



In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Rich <wielgosz@...> wrote:
>
> On Sat, 2009-02-07 at 00:57 -0500, A. Tullia Scholastica wrote:
>
> > I live east of Syracuse NY. That's the biggest population
> > center
> > nearest to me.
> >
> > Scholastica: and there may be some citizens around there,
> > too, though NYC is a better bet. As earlier, I’m here too,

> > not ALL that far away.
>
> Absolutely. But two people do not exactly make for the kind of social
> event I was imagining. :-)
>
> > I have communicated with a few people off list, actually. I
> > produce a
> > podcast and thought I might like to get involved with a
> > podcast produced
> > by Nova Romans. That collaboration hasn't happened yet.
> >
> > Scholastica: Nor is it likely. The producer is in grad
> > school, and the technical person is busy with two little
> > preschool kids and a lot of other things, including a broken
> > server for the Academia Thules, which has been our educational
> > arm, so to speak, though it is technically unrelated to NR.
> > There are other issues there as well.
>
> Well, I'm too busy with my podcast to get involved in the production
> of another at this time, anyway. Although an OFFICIAL Nova Roma podcast
> sounds like a great way to increase membership.
>
> Regards,
> Rich...
>


Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60935 From: Maior Date: 2009-02-07
Subject: Re: Curious non-member with some questions.
Maior Ricardo quiritibus spd:
this discussion has inspired me to want Vox Romana to do a piece
on Bona Dea and her temple in Rome.
The precincts of this ancient goddess' temple were only open to
women and Bona Dea's priestesses operated a kind of pharmacy where
women could obtain abortificants.

I shocked, really freaked out a lot of people on a latin list with
this knowledge that a common culture existed where abortion was just
fine and pretty easily obtainable (though conservative Romans would
rail against it)

So here is a good example of a huge cultural difference between
Republican polytheistic Rome and moderns with their Judae-Christian
backgrounds. Of course as Nova Roma we follow Republican Rome!
optime vale
M. Hortensia Maior
Flaminica Carmentalis
Producer Vox Romana podcast

>
> SaIve Ricarde;
> I'm M. Hortensia Maior producer of Vox Romana podcast, actually
> Saturninus wrote to me not too long ago about the next podcast, but I
> was super busy. If you are interested please write to me. I would like
> to see another one go out.
>
> As for just 2 people, I live in Chapel Hill, NC near Duke with 2 big
> classics dept and I was the only Nova Roman here. But I met new civis
> M. Aelia Connonia and then this last summer Q. Caelia Laeta who
> joined. Yes we're two but now we meet and study and try to speak Latin
> together, discuss NR and we're thinking of celebrating maybe the
> Floralia and having a big party making Roman food and putting up a
> poster at these departments...So you see you can recruit.
>
> Nova Roma is a culture its not the SCA at all.There is no fantasy in
> what we're doing..
> If you ignore politics,religio, etc you're missing out on being
> fully Roman on interacting as a 21st century Roman. We are not RPG we
> re the rebirth the revival of Roman culture, Roman values in the 21st
> century. It's a wholistic experience.
> I hoped I've cleared things up for you. Do write, epistulum mihi
scrivas
> valeas
> Maior
>
>
> In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Rich <wielgosz@> wrote:
> >
> > On Sat, 2009-02-07 at 00:57 -0500, A. Tullia Scholastica wrote:
> >
> > > I live east of Syracuse NY. That's the biggest population
> > > center
> > > nearest to me.
> > >
> > > Scholastica: and there may be some citizens around
there,
> > > too, though NYC is a better bet. As earlier, I’m here
too,
> > > not ALL that far away.
> >
> > Absolutely. But two people do not exactly make for the kind of
social
> > event I was imagining. :-)
> >
> > > I have communicated with a few people off list, actually. I
> > > produce a
> > > podcast and thought I might like to get involved with a
> > > podcast produced
> > > by Nova Romans. That collaboration hasn't happened yet.
> > >
> > > Scholastica: Nor is it likely. The producer is in grad
> > > school, and the technical person is busy with two little
> > > preschool kids and a lot of other things, including a broken
> > > server for the Academia Thules, which has been our
educational
> > > arm, so to speak, though it is technically unrelated to NR.
> > > There are other issues there as well.
> >
> > Well, I'm too busy with my podcast to get involved in the production
> > of another at this time, anyway. Although an OFFICIAL Nova Roma
podcast
> > sounds like a great way to increase membership.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Rich...
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60936 From: Titus Annaeus Regulus Date: 2009-02-07
Subject: Re: Curious non-member with some questions.
Salve Maior,
 
If conservative Romans railed against it then, and conservatives rail against it now, I don't see why you would make it into a religious matter. Perhaps it has more to do with conservatives than religion? =)
 
I'm sure if you asked a Roman Catholic priest he wouldn't be too smitten with the idea of abortion of course, but I don't think anyone would accuse the Catholic church of being overly progressive. Pretty clear parallels could be drawn between the masses that choose to use the service, and a conservative portion of the population that disagrees with it both then and now. I know here in Canada most people are at least nominally Christian, and yet our public health-care system permits abortions without embracing Republican values.
 
Vale,
Titus Annaeus Regulus

From: Maior
Sent: Saturday, February 07, 2009 4:05 PM
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Curious non-member with some questions.

Maior Ricardo quiritibus spd:
this discussion has inspired me to want Vox Romana to do a piece
on Bona Dea and her temple in Rome.
The precincts of this ancient goddess' temple were only open to
women and Bona Dea's priestesses operated a kind of pharmacy where
women could obtain abortificants.

I shocked, really freaked out a lot of people on a latin list with
this knowledge that a common culture existed where abortion was just
fine and pretty easily obtainable (though conservative Romans would
rail against it)

So here is a good example of a huge cultural difference between
Republican polytheistic Rome and moderns with their Judae-Christian
backgrounds. Of course as Nova Roma we follow Republican Rome!
optime vale
M. Hortensia Maior
Flaminica Carmentalis
Producer Vox Romana podcast

>
> SaIve Ricarde;
> I'm M. Hortensia
Maior producer of Vox Romana podcast, actually
> Saturninus wrote to me
not too long ago about the next podcast, but I
> was super busy. If you
are interested please write to me. I would like
> to see another one go
out.
>
> As for just 2 people, I live in Chapel Hill, NC near Duke
with 2 big
> classics dept and I was the only Nova Roman here. But I met
new civis
> M. Aelia Connonia and then this last summer Q. Caelia Laeta
who
> joined. Yes we're two but now we meet and study and try to speak
Latin
> together, discuss NR and we're thinking of celebrating maybe
the
> Floralia and having a big party making Roman food and putting up
a
> poster at these departments. ..So you see you can recruit.
>
> Nova Roma is a culture its not the SCA at all.There is no fantasy
in
> what we're doing..
> If you ignore politics,religio, etc you're
missing out on being
> fully Roman on interacting as a 21st century Roman.
We are not RPG we
> re the rebirth the revival of Roman culture, Roman
values in the 21st
> century. It's a wholistic experience.
> I hoped
I've cleared things up for you. Do write, epistulum mihi
scrivas
>
valeas
> Maior
>
>
> In
href="mailto:Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com">Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com, Rich <wielgosz@> wrote:
> >
> > On Sat, 2009-02-07 at
00:57 -0500, A. Tullia Scholastica wrote:
> >
> > > I live
east of Syracuse NY. That's the biggest population
> > >
center
> > > nearest to me.
> > >
> > >
Scholastica: and there may be some citizens around
there,
> > >
too, though NYC is a better bet. As earlier, I’m here
too,
> > > not ALL that far away.
> >
> > Absolutely. But two
people do not exactly make for the kind of
social
> > event I was
imagining. :-)
> >
> > > I have communicated with a few
people off list, actually. I
> > > produce a
> > >
podcast and thought I might like to get involved with a
> > >
podcast produced
> > > by Nova Romans. That collaboration hasn't
happened yet.
> > >
> > > Scholastica: Nor is it
likely. The producer is in grad
> > > school, and the technical
person is busy with two little
> > > preschool kids and a lot of
other things, including a broken
> > > server for the Academia
Thules, which has been our
educational
> > > arm, so to speak,
though it is technically unrelated to NR.
> > > There are other
issues there as well.
> >
> > Well, I'm too busy with my
podcast to get involved in the production
> > of another at this time,
anyway. Although an OFFICIAL Nova Roma
podcast
> > sounds like a
great way to increase membership.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Rich...
> >
>

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60937 From: Rich Date: 2009-02-07
Subject: Re: Curious non-member with some questions.
On Sat, 2009-02-07 at 18:43 +0000, Maior wrote:

> SaIve Ricarde;
> I'm M. Hortensia Maior producer of Vox Romana podcast, actually
> Saturninus wrote to me not too long ago about the next podcast, but I
> was super busy. If you are interested please write to me. I would like
> to see another one go out.

I'm on your Vox Roman Yahoo list, I believe. But unfortunately do not
have time to help with another podcast at this time. I produce my own
weekly podcast which takes up a lot of free time. Plus there's that
whole sleep thing.

> As for just 2 people, I live in Chapel Hill, NC near Duke with 2 big
> classics dept and I was the only Nova Roman here. But I met new civis
> M. Aelia Connonia and then this last summer Q. Caelia Laeta who
> joined. Yes we're two but now we meet and study and try to speak Latin
> together, discuss NR and we're thinking of celebrating maybe the
> Floralia and having a big party making Roman food and putting up a
> poster at these departments...So you see you can recruit.

Absolutely.

> Nova Roma is a culture its not the SCA at all.There is no fantasy in
> what we're doing..

Nor was I implying anything negative. I was only drawing comparisons
to what the two groups do have in common. At their simplest, they're
groups of people with a common interest. Clearly there are areas where
they diverge.

However, I think you might be insulting some SCA people by implying
what they're doing is fantasy. Many of them carry the values from the
cultures they admire, into their lives as well.

> If you ignore politics,religio, etc you're missing out on being
> fully Roman on interacting as a 21st century Roman. We are not RPG we
> re the rebirth the revival of Roman culture, Roman values in the 21st
> century. It's a wholistic experience.
> I hoped I've cleared things up for you. Do write, epistulum mihi
> scrivas
> valeas
> Maior

Well you might actually be hitting on the crux of my issues. Despite
my love of most things Roman, NR might not be the group for me.

With regards to religion, polytheism interests me in the sense that
Unix interests me. Long before there were GUI's, there was the unix
command line, and the philosophy was to have one program do ONE thing,
and do it really well. To me it makes more sense to have separate gods
for separate things, but at the end of the day, one god or many gods
just doesn't fit with my world view.

Politics interest me in real life, and I am very active locally. That
being said, I do want Nova Roma to be something of an escape for me. I
don't want politics to destroy my good time. As I said I've been
observing this list for about two years now, and I sometimes see
bickering. I have enough of that in other areas of my life, I don't
need it in an area where I'm trying to enjoy myself.

Best regards,
Rich...
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60938 From: Maior Date: 2009-02-07
Subject: Re: Curious non-member with some questions.
Salve Regule;
you're not asking why Roman conservatives didn't like it:) They
wanted more Roman boys! A very different attitude than today And
that's the big point I'm tying to make about Republican culture.

great discussion to have,
valeas Maior

>
> Salve Maior,
>
> If conservative Romans railed against it then, and conservatives
rail against it now, I don't see why you would make it into a
religious matter. Perhaps it has more to do with conservatives than
religion? =)
>
> I'm sure if you asked a Roman Catholic priest he wouldn't be too
smitten with the idea of abortion of course, but I don't think anyone
would accuse the Catholic church of being overly progressive. Pretty
clear parallels could be drawn between the masses that choose to use
the service, and a conservative portion of the population that
disagrees with it both then and now. I know here in Canada most people
are at least nominally Christian, and yet our public health-care
system permits abortions without embracing Republican values.
>
> Vale,
> Titus Annaeus Regulus
>
>
> From: Maior
> Sent: Saturday, February 07, 2009 4:05 PM
> To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Curious non-member with some questions.
>
>
> Maior Ricardo quiritibus spd:
> this discussion has inspired me to want Vox Romana to do a piece
> on Bona Dea and her temple in Rome.
> The precincts of this ancient goddess' temple were only open to
> women and Bona Dea's priestesses operated a kind of pharmacy where
> women could obtain abortificants.
>
> I shocked, really freaked out a lot of people on a latin list with
> this knowledge that a common culture existed where abortion was just
> fine and pretty easily obtainable (though conservative Romans would
> rail against it)
>
> So here is a good example of a huge cultural difference between
> Republican polytheistic Rome and moderns with their Judae-Christian
> backgrounds. Of course as Nova Roma we follow Republican Rome!
> optime vale
> M. Hortensia Maior
> Flaminica Carmentalis
> Producer Vox Romana podcast
>
> >
> > SaIve Ricarde;
> > I'm M. Hortensia Maior producer of Vox Romana podcast, actually
> > Saturninus wrote to me not too long ago about the next podcast, but I
> > was super busy. If you are interested please write to me. I would like
> > to see another one go out.
> >
> > As for just 2 people, I live in Chapel Hill, NC near Duke with 2 big
> > classics dept and I was the only Nova Roman here. But I met new civis
> > M. Aelia Connonia and then this last summer Q. Caelia Laeta who
> > joined. Yes we're two but now we meet and study and try to speak Latin
> > together, discuss NR and we're thinking of celebrating maybe the
> > Floralia and having a big party making Roman food and putting up a
> > poster at these departments...So you see you can recruit.
> >
> > Nova Roma is a culture its not the SCA at all.There is no fantasy in
> > what we're doing..
> > If you ignore politics,religio, etc you're missing out on being
> > fully Roman on interacting as a 21st century Roman. We are not RPG we
> > re the rebirth the revival of Roman culture, Roman values in the 21st
> > century. It's a wholistic experience.
> > I hoped I've cleared things up for you. Do write, epistulum mihi
> scrivas
> > valeas
> > Maior
> >
> >
> > In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Rich <wielgosz@> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Sat, 2009-02-07 at 00:57 -0500, A. Tullia Scholastica wrote:
> > >
> > > > I live east of Syracuse NY. That's the biggest population
> > > > center
> > > > nearest to me.
> > > >
> > > > Scholastica: and there may be some citizens around
> there,
> > > > too, though NYC is a better bet. As earlier, Iâ?Tm here
> too,
> > > > not ALL that far away.
> > >
> > > Absolutely. But two people do not exactly make for the kind of
> social
> > > event I was imagining. :-)
> > >
> > > > I have communicated with a few people off list, actually. I
> > > > produce a
> > > > podcast and thought I might like to get involved with a
> > > > podcast produced
> > > > by Nova Romans. That collaboration hasn't happened yet.
> > > >
> > > > Scholastica: Nor is it likely. The producer is in grad
> > > > school, and the technical person is busy with two little
> > > > preschool kids and a lot of other things, including a broken
> > > > server for the Academia Thules, which has been our
> educational
> > > > arm, so to speak, though it is technically unrelated to NR.
> > > > There are other issues there as well.
> > >
> > > Well, I'm too busy with my podcast to get involved in the production
> > > of another at this time, anyway. Although an OFFICIAL Nova Roma
> podcast
> > > sounds like a great way to increase membership.
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Rich...
> > >
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60939 From: Rich Date: 2009-02-07
Subject: Re: Curious non-member with some questions.
On Sat, 2009-02-07 at 14:09 -0500, D. Aemilus Severus wrote:

Salve,

Yes, that's my point exactly. I just replied to a message pointing out
to me that NR differs from other groups because it is attempting to be a
new Rome in the 21st century, and that I should experience the whole
enchilada (gov't and religio). I did understand that because I have
spent a lot of time reading the web site. But again, if I am the only
Nova Roman within three hours of me, it would be as you put it, a
largely web-based experience for me. :-)

It reminds me of a headline I saw in The Onion many years ago,
"Yellowstone National Park Website makes Park Obsolete," or something
like that. :-)

I prefer the real world.

I would like to thank you all for replying to me, and helping me with
my questions. I hope I'm not being a downer, and I'm sure that I will
become a part of your community.

Best,
Rich...

> Salve Ricarde,
>
> I live fairly close to you in Kingston, Ontario - which is roughly an
> hour or so away. I am really not sure if there are any citizens near
> me as I too have struggled to find others to meet face-to-face. I was
> figuring I would have to go to Toronto. Like you said, the pair of us
> getting together over a beverage in Watertown may not be the social
> highlight of the Nova Roma calendar, but at least it would be a first
> step towards something not entirely web-based.
>
> Vale,
>
> D•ÆMILIVS•SEVERVS
>
>
> On Sat, Feb 7, 2009 at 1:43 PM, Maior <rory12001@...> wrote:
> SaIve Ricarde;
> I'm M. Hortensia Maior producer of Vox Romana podcast,
> actually
> Saturninus wrote to me not too long ago about the next
> podcast, but I
> was super busy. If you are interested please write to me. I
> would like
> to see another one go out.
>
> As for just 2 people, I live in Chapel Hill, NC near Duke with
> 2 big
> classics dept and I was the only Nova Roman here. But I met
> new civis
> M. Aelia Connonia and then this last summer Q. Caelia Laeta
> who
> joined. Yes we're two but now we meet and study and try to
> speak Latin
> together, discuss NR and we're thinking of celebrating maybe
> the
> Floralia and having a big party making Roman food and putting
> up a
> poster at these departments...So you see you can recruit.
>
> Nova Roma is a culture its not the SCA at all.There is no
> fantasy in
> what we're doing..
> If you ignore politics,religio, etc you're missing out on
> being
> fully Roman on interacting as a 21st century Roman. We are not
> RPG we
> re the rebirth the revival of Roman culture, Roman values in
> the 21st
> century. It's a wholistic experience.
> I hoped I've cleared things up for you. Do write, epistulum
> mihi scrivas
> valeas
> Maior
>
>
>
> In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Rich <wielgosz@...> wrote:
> >
> > On Sat, 2009-02-07 at 00:57 -0500, A. Tullia Scholastica
> wrote:
> >
> > > I live east of Syracuse NY. That's the biggest population
> > > center
> > > nearest to me.
> > >
> > > Scholastica: and there may be some citizens around there,
>
> > > too, though NYC is a better bet. As earlier, I’m here
> too,
>
> > > not ALL that far away.
> >
> > Absolutely. But two people do not exactly make for the kind
> of social
> > event I was imagining. :-)
> >
> > > I have communicated with a few people off list, actually.
> I
> > > produce a
> > > podcast and thought I might like to get involved with a
> > > podcast produced
> > > by Nova Romans. That collaboration hasn't happened yet.
> > >
> > > Scholastica: Nor is it likely. The producer is in grad
> > > school, and the technical person is busy with two little
> > > preschool kids and a lot of other things, including a
> broken
> > > server for the Academia Thules, which has been our
> educational
> > > arm, so to speak, though it is technically unrelated to
> NR.
> > > There are other issues there as well.
> >
> > Well, I'm too busy with my podcast to get involved in the
> production
> > of another at this time, anyway. Although an OFFICIAL Nova
> Roma podcast
> > sounds like a great way to increase membership.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Rich...
> >
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60940 From: Steve Moore Date: 2009-02-07
Subject: Re: Curious non-member with some questions.

M. Valerius Potitus D. Aemilio Severo SPD.

 

Salve!

 

I whole-heartedly encourage you two to meet face-to-face. Here in Arizona , I drive 2 hours each month to meet with at least one other citizen in our Oppidum. I can tell you from experience that it’s worth the effort.

 

Face-to-face meetings are the future of Nova Roma (in my opinion), and any step in that direction is a good one.

 

Vale optime.

 

 


From: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com [mailto:Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of D. Aemilus Severus
Sent: Saturday, February 07, 2009 12:10 PM
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: Curious non-member with some questions.

 

Salve Ricarde,

 

I live fairly close to you in Kingston , Ontario - which is roughly an hour or so away.  I am really not sure if there are any citizens near me as I too have struggled to find others to meet face-to-face.  I was figuring I would have to go to Toronto .  Like you said, the pair of us getting together over a beverage in Watertown may not be the social highlight of the Nova Roma calendar, but at least it would be a first step towards something not entirely web-based.

 

Vale,

 

D•Ã†MILIVS•SEVERVS

 

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60941 From: Titus Annaeus Regulus Date: 2009-02-07
Subject: Re: Curious non-member with some questions.
Salve Maior,
 
You must be looking at a different church than I. =) My mother's family is traditional Irish Catholic. I can think of few families in my grandparents' generation of less than 10 children (my grandmother had 15 siblings), and my mother had 6 siblings. I can't speak to motives, but I can't argue with the results. It is no coincidence that there are over 1,000,000,000 Catholics. Considering the early Church had no laws against abortion (in fact St. Augustine of Hippo Regius wrote that abortion is not a murder since a fetus would have no soul), I can see no reason for later Church leaders to add it (in the face of previous precedent) except for the obvious benefits of increased manpower. Besides, when you consider that the Church generally frowns upon sexual activity, it becomes even more apparent that this frequent sanctimonious shagging belief was more a matter of convenience than conviction. I will also say that the Church has historically provided support for the orphans that this sort of practice inevitably creates, so hats off for supporting their practice, but I do not think that the anti-abortion (pro-life?) movement is anything intrinsically Judaeo-Christian. Just to keep pumping out missionaries, priests, nuns, monks and crusades one needs a large pool of manpower.
 
Vale,
Regulus

From: Maior
Sent: Saturday, February 07, 2009 4:54 PM
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Curious non-member with some questions.

Salve Regule;
you're not asking why Roman conservatives didn't like it:) They
wanted more Roman boys! A very different attitude than today And
that's the big point I'm tying to make about Republican culture.

great discussion to have,
valeas Maior

>
> Salve
Maior,
>
> If conservative Romans railed against it then, and
conservatives
rail against it now, I don't see why you would make it into a
religious matter. Perhaps it has more to do with conservatives than
religion? =)
>
> I'm sure if you asked a Roman Catholic
priest he wouldn't be too
smitten with the idea of abortion of course, but I don't think anyone
would accuse the Catholic church of being overly progressive. Pretty
clear parallels could be drawn between the masses that choose to use
the service, and a conservative portion of the population that
disagrees with it both then and now. I know here in Canada most people
are at least nominally Christian, and yet our public health-care
system permits abortions without embracing Republican values.
>
> Vale,
> Titus Annaeus Regulus
>
>
> From: Maior
> Sent: Saturday, February 07, 2009 4:05 PM
>
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com
> Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Curious non-member with some
questions.
>
>
> Maior Ricardo quiritibus spd:
> this
discussion has inspired me to want Vox Romana to do a piece
> on Bona Dea
and her temple in Rome.
> The precincts of this ancient goddess' temple
were only open to
> women and Bona Dea's priestesses operated a kind of
pharmacy where
> women could obtain abortificants.
>
> I
shocked, really freaked out a lot of people on a latin list with
> this
knowledge that a common culture existed where abortion was just
> fine and
pretty easily obtainable (though conservative Romans would
> rail against
it)
>
> So here is a good example of a huge cultural difference
between
> Republican polytheistic Rome and moderns with their
Judae-Christian
> backgrounds. Of course as Nova Roma we follow Republican
Rome!
> optime vale
> M. Hortensia Maior
> Flaminica
Carmentalis
> Producer Vox Romana podcast
>
> >
> > SaIve Ricarde;
> > I'm M. Hortensia Maior producer of Vox Romana
podcast, actually
> > Saturninus wrote to me not too long ago about the
next podcast, but I
> > was super busy. If you are interested please
write to me. I would like
> > to see another one go out.
> >
> > As for just 2 people, I live in Chapel Hill, NC near Duke with 2
big
> > classics dept and I was the only Nova Roman here. But I met new
civis
> > M. Aelia Connonia and then this last summer Q. Caelia Laeta
who
> > joined. Yes we're two but now we meet and study and try to
speak Latin
> > together, discuss NR and we're thinking of celebrating
maybe the
> > Floralia and having a big party making Roman food and
putting up a
> > poster at these departments. ..So you see you can
recruit.
> >
> > Nova Roma is a culture its not the SCA at
all.There is no fantasy in
> > what we're doing..
> > If you
ignore politics,religio, etc you're missing out on being
> > fully
Roman on interacting as a 21st century Roman. We are not RPG we
> > re
the rebirth the revival of Roman culture, Roman values in the 21st
> >
century. It's a wholistic experience.
> > I hoped I've cleared things
up for you. Do write, epistulum mihi
> scrivas
> > valeas
> > Maior
> >
> >
> > In
href="mailto:Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com">Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com, Rich <wielgosz@> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Sat,
2009-02-07 at 00:57 -0500, A. Tullia Scholastica wrote:
> > >
> > > > I live east of Syracuse NY. That's the biggest
population
> > > > center
> > > > nearest to
me.
> > > >
> > > > Scholastica: and there may be
some citizens around
> there,
> > > > too, though NYC is a
better bet. As earlier, Iâ?Tm here
> too,
> > > > not ALL
that far away.
> > >
> > > Absolutely. But two people
do not exactly make for the kind of
> social
> > > event I was
imagining. :-)
> > >
> > > > I have communicated
with a few people off list, actually. I
> > > > produce a
> > > > podcast and thought I might like to get involved with a
> > > > podcast produced
> > > > by Nova Romans. That
collaboration hasn't happened yet.
> > > >
> > > > Scholastica: Nor is it likely. The producer is in grad
> > > > school, and the technical person is busy with two little
> > > > preschool kids and a lot of other things, including a broken
> > > > server for the Academia Thules, which has been our
>
educational
> > > > arm, so to speak, though it is technically
unrelated to NR.
> > > > There are other issues there as well.
> > >
> > > Well, I'm too busy with my podcast to get
involved in the production
> > > of another at this time, anyway.
Although an OFFICIAL Nova Roma
> podcast
> > > sounds like a
great way to increase membership.
> > >
> > >
Regards,
> > > Rich...
> > >
> >
>

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60942 From: Maior Date: 2009-02-07
Subject: Re: Curious non-member with some questions.
Regule;
frankly I don't care that the RC church was/is against birth
control or was for/against abortion. That's a private cultus with no
interest to me.
What I'm saying is that this is a good example of Roman culture,
where political conservatives might complain that Roman women were not
bearing enough chiidren, What could they do? very little, Except
Augustus who rewarded matrons who had 3 children, you see it's the
state who is involved in this issue in Rome.
optime vale
Maior

>
> Salve Maior,
>
> You must be looking at a different church than I. =) My mother's
family is traditional Irish Catholic. I can think of few families in
my grandparents' generation of less than 10 children (my grandmother
had 15 siblings), and my mother had 6 siblings. I can't speak to
motives, but I can't argue with the results. It is no coincidence that
there are over 1,000,000,000 Catholics. Considering the early Church
had no laws against abortion (in fact St. Augustine of Hippo Regius
wrote that abortion is not a murder since a fetus would have no soul),
I can see no reason for later Church leaders to add it (in the face of
previous precedent) except for the obvious benefits of increased
manpower. Besides, when you consider that the Church generally frowns
upon sexual activity, it becomes even more apparent that this frequent
sanctimonious shagging belief was more a matter of convenience than
conviction. I will also say that the Church has historically provided
support for the orphans that this sort of practice inevitably creates,
so hats off for supporting their practice, but I do not think that the
anti-abortion (pro-life?) movement is anything intrinsically
Judaeo-Christian. Just to keep pumping out missionaries, priests,
nuns, monks and crusades one needs a large pool of manpower.
>
> Vale,
> Regulus
>
>
> From: Maior
> Sent: Saturday, February 07, 2009 4:54 PM
> To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Curious non-member with some questions.
>
>
> Salve Regule;
> you're not asking why Roman conservatives didn't like it:) They
> wanted more Roman boys! A very different attitude than today And
> that's the big point I'm tying to make about Republican culture.
>
> great discussion to have,
> valeas Maior
>
> >
> > Salve Maior,
> >
> > If conservative Romans railed against it then, and conservatives
> rail against it now, I don't see why you would make it into a
> religious matter. Perhaps it has more to do with conservatives than
> religion? =)
> >
> > I'm sure if you asked a Roman Catholic priest he wouldn't be too
> smitten with the idea of abortion of course, but I don't think anyone
> would accuse the Catholic church of being overly progressive. Pretty
> clear parallels could be drawn between the masses that choose to use
> the service, and a conservative portion of the population that
> disagrees with it both then and now. I know here in Canada most people
> are at least nominally Christian, and yet our public health-care
> system permits abortions without embracing Republican values.
> >
> > Vale,
> > Titus Annaeus Regulus
> >
> >
> > From: Maior
> > Sent: Saturday, February 07, 2009 4:05 PM
> > To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> > Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Curious non-member with some questions.
> >
> >
> > Maior Ricardo quiritibus spd:
> > this discussion has inspired me to want Vox Romana to do a piece
> > on Bona Dea and her temple in Rome.
> > The precincts of this ancient goddess' temple were only open to
> > women and Bona Dea's priestesses operated a kind of pharmacy where
> > women could obtain abortificants.
> >
> > I shocked, really freaked out a lot of people on a latin list with
> > this knowledge that a common culture existed where abortion was just
> > fine and pretty easily obtainable (though conservative Romans would
> > rail against it)
> >
> > So here is a good example of a huge cultural difference between
> > Republican polytheistic Rome and moderns with their Judae-Christian
> > backgrounds. Of course as Nova Roma we follow Republican Rome!
> > optime vale
> > M. Hortensia Maior
> > Flaminica Carmentalis
> > Producer Vox Romana podcast
> >
> > >
> > > SaIve Ricarde;
> > > I'm M. Hortensia Maior producer of Vox Romana podcast, actually
> > > Saturninus wrote to me not too long ago about the next podcast,
but I
> > > was super busy. If you are interested please write to me. I
would like
> > > to see another one go out.
> > >
> > > As for just 2 people, I live in Chapel Hill, NC near Duke with 2 big
> > > classics dept and I was the only Nova Roman here. But I met new
civis
> > > M. Aelia Connonia and then this last summer Q. Caelia Laeta who
> > > joined. Yes we're two but now we meet and study and try to speak
Latin
> > > together, discuss NR and we're thinking of celebrating maybe the
> > > Floralia and having a big party making Roman food and putting up a
> > > poster at these departments...So you see you can recruit.
> > >
> > > Nova Roma is a culture its not the SCA at all.There is no fantasy in
> > > what we're doing..
> > > If you ignore politics,religio, etc you're missing out on being
> > > fully Roman on interacting as a 21st century Roman. We are not
RPG we
> > > re the rebirth the revival of Roman culture, Roman values in the
21st
> > > century. It's a wholistic experience.
> > > I hoped I've cleared things up for you. Do write, epistulum mihi
> > scrivas
> > > valeas
> > > Maior
> > >
> > >
> > > In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Rich <wielgosz@> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Sat, 2009-02-07 at 00:57 -0500, A. Tullia Scholastica wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > I live east of Syracuse NY. That's the biggest population
> > > > > center
> > > > > nearest to me.
> > > > >
> > > > > Scholastica: and there may be some citizens around
> > there,
> > > > > too, though NYC is a better bet. As earlier, Iâ?Tm here
> > too,
> > > > > not ALL that far away.
> > > >
> > > > Absolutely. But two people do not exactly make for the kind of
> > social
> > > > event I was imagining. :-)
> > > >
> > > > > I have communicated with a few people off list, actually. I
> > > > > produce a
> > > > > podcast and thought I might like to get involved with a
> > > > > podcast produced
> > > > > by Nova Romans. That collaboration hasn't happened yet.
> > > > >
> > > > > Scholastica: Nor is it likely. The producer is in grad
> > > > > school, and the technical person is busy with two little
> > > > > preschool kids and a lot of other things, including a broken
> > > > > server for the Academia Thules, which has been our
> > educational
> > > > > arm, so to speak, though it is technically unrelated to NR.
> > > > > There are other issues there as well.
> > > >
> > > > Well, I'm too busy with my podcast to get involved in the
production
> > > > of another at this time, anyway. Although an OFFICIAL Nova Roma
> > podcast
> > > > sounds like a great way to increase membership.
> > > >
> > > > Regards,
> > > > Rich...
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60943 From: Rich Date: 2009-02-07
Subject: Re: Curious non-member with some questions.
On Sat, 2009-02-07 at 22:17 +0000, Maior wrote:

I don't suppose you would be willing to change the subject header of
this fork in the thread please, so I can more easily find the thread
that I started?

Best,
Rich...

> Regule;
> frankly I don't care that the RC church was/is against birth
> control or was for/against abortion. That's a private cultus with no
> interest to me.
> What I'm saying is that this is a good example of Roman culture,
> where political conservatives might complain that Roman women were not
> bearing enough chiidren, What could they do? very little, Except
> Augustus who rewarded matrons who had 3 children, you see it's the
> state who is involved in this issue in Rome.
> optime vale
> Maior
>
> >
> > Salve Maior,
> >
> > You must be looking at a different church than I. =) My mother's
> family is traditional Irish Catholic. I can think of few families in
> my grandparents' generation of less than 10 children (my grandmother
> had 15 siblings), and my mother had 6 siblings. I can't speak to
> motives, but I can't argue with the results. It is no coincidence that
> there are over 1,000,000,000 Catholics. Considering the early Church
> had no laws against abortion (in fact St. Augustine of Hippo Regius
> wrote that abortion is not a murder since a fetus would have no soul),
> I can see no reason for later Church leaders to add it (in the face of
> previous precedent) except for the obvious benefits of increased
> manpower. Besides, when you consider that the Church generally frowns
> upon sexual activity, it becomes even more apparent that this frequent
> sanctimonious shagging belief was more a matter of convenience than
> conviction. I will also say that the Church has historically provided
> support for the orphans that this sort of practice inevitably creates,
> so hats off for supporting their practice, but I do not think that the
> anti-abortion (pro-life?) movement is anything intrinsically
> Judaeo-Christian. Just to keep pumping out missionaries, priests,
> nuns, monks and crusades one needs a large pool of manpower.
> >
> > Vale,
> > Regulus
> >
> >
> > From: Maior
> > Sent: Saturday, February 07, 2009 4:54 PM
> > To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> > Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Curious non-member with some questions.
> >
> >
> > Salve Regule;
> > you're not asking why Roman conservatives didn't like it:) They
> > wanted more Roman boys! A very different attitude than today And
> > that's the big point I'm tying to make about Republican culture.
> >
> > great discussion to have,
> > valeas Maior
> >
> > >
> > > Salve Maior,
> > >
> > > If conservative Romans railed against it then, and conservatives
> > rail against it now, I don't see why you would make it into a
> > religious matter. Perhaps it has more to do with conservatives than
> > religion? =)
> > >
> > > I'm sure if you asked a Roman Catholic priest he wouldn't be too
> > smitten with the idea of abortion of course, but I don't think
> anyone
> > would accuse the Catholic church of being overly progressive. Pretty
> > clear parallels could be drawn between the masses that choose to use
> > the service, and a conservative portion of the population that
> > disagrees with it both then and now. I know here in Canada most
> people
> > are at least nominally Christian, and yet our public health-care
> > system permits abortions without embracing Republican values.
> > >
> > > Vale,
> > > Titus Annaeus Regulus
> > >
> > >
> > > From: Maior
> > > Sent: Saturday, February 07, 2009 4:05 PM
> > > To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> > > Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Curious non-member with some questions.
> > >
> > >
> > > Maior Ricardo quiritibus spd:
> > > this discussion has inspired me to want Vox Romana to do a piece
> > > on Bona Dea and her temple in Rome.
> > > The precincts of this ancient goddess' temple were only open to
> > > women and Bona Dea's priestesses operated a kind of pharmacy where
> > > women could obtain abortificants.
> > >
> > > I shocked, really freaked out a lot of people on a latin list with
> > > this knowledge that a common culture existed where abortion was
> just
> > > fine and pretty easily obtainable (though conservative Romans
> would
> > > rail against it)
> > >
> > > So here is a good example of a huge cultural difference between
> > > Republican polytheistic Rome and moderns with their
> Judae-Christian
> > > backgrounds. Of course as Nova Roma we follow Republican Rome!
> > > optime vale
> > > M. Hortensia Maior
> > > Flaminica Carmentalis
> > > Producer Vox Romana podcast
> > >
> > > >
> > > > SaIve Ricarde;
> > > > I'm M. Hortensia Maior producer of Vox Romana podcast, actually
> > > > Saturninus wrote to me not too long ago about the next podcast,
> but I
> > > > was super busy. If you are interested please write to me. I
> would like
> > > > to see another one go out.
> > > >
> > > > As for just 2 people, I live in Chapel Hill, NC near Duke with 2
> big
> > > > classics dept and I was the only Nova Roman here. But I met new
> civis
> > > > M. Aelia Connonia and then this last summer Q. Caelia Laeta who
> > > > joined. Yes we're two but now we meet and study and try to speak
> Latin
> > > > together, discuss NR and we're thinking of celebrating maybe the
> > > > Floralia and having a big party making Roman food and putting up
> a
> > > > poster at these departments...So you see you can recruit.
> > > >
> > > > Nova Roma is a culture its not the SCA at all.There is no
> fantasy in
> > > > what we're doing..
> > > > If you ignore politics,religio, etc you're missing out on being
> > > > fully Roman on interacting as a 21st century Roman. We are not
> RPG we
> > > > re the rebirth the revival of Roman culture, Roman values in the
> 21st
> > > > century. It's a wholistic experience.
> > > > I hoped I've cleared things up for you. Do write, epistulum mihi
> > > scrivas
> > > > valeas
> > > > Maior
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Rich <wielgosz@> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > On Sat, 2009-02-07 at 00:57 -0500, A. Tullia Scholastica
> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > I live east of Syracuse NY. That's the biggest population
> > > > > > center
> > > > > > nearest to me.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Scholastica: and there may be some citizens around
> > > there,
> > > > > > too, though NYC is a better bet. As earlier, Iâ?Tm here
> > > too,
> > > > > > not ALL that far away.
> > > > >
> > > > > Absolutely. But two people do not exactly make for the kind of
> > > social
> > > > > event I was imagining. :-)
> > > > >
> > > > > > I have communicated with a few people off list, actually. I
> > > > > > produce a
> > > > > > podcast and thought I might like to get involved with a
> > > > > > podcast produced
> > > > > > by Nova Romans. That collaboration hasn't happened yet.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Scholastica: Nor is it likely. The producer is in grad
> > > > > > school, and the technical person is busy with two little
> > > > > > preschool kids and a lot of other things, including a broken
> > > > > > server for the Academia Thules, which has been our
> > > educational
> > > > > > arm, so to speak, though it is technically unrelated to NR.
> > > > > > There are other issues there as well.
> > > > >
> > > > > Well, I'm too busy with my podcast to get involved in the
> production
> > > > > of another at this time, anyway. Although an OFFICIAL Nova
> Roma
> > > podcast
> > > > > sounds like a great way to increase membership.
> > > > >
> > > > > Regards,
> > > > > Rich...
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
>
>
>
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60944 From: Maior Date: 2009-02-07
Subject: Re: Curious non-member with some questions.
Salve Ricarde;
I'd considered it, but actually wanted you to read the discussion.
This is Rome, Roman history; you know the story of Clodius Pulcher and
how he breached the festivities of Bona Dea....
Maior

>
> I don't suppose you would be willing to change the subject header of
> this fork in the thread please, so I can more easily find the thread
> that I started?
>
> Best,
> Rich...
>
> > Regule;
> > frankly I don't care that the RC church was/is against birth
> > control or was for/against abortion. That's a private cultus with no
> > interest to me.
> > What I'm saying is that this is a good example of Roman culture,
> > where political conservatives might complain that Roman women were not
> > bearing enough chiidren, What could they do? very little, Except
> > Augustus who rewarded matrons who had 3 children, you see it's the
> > state who is involved in this issue in Rome.
> > optime vale
> > Maior
> >
> > >
> > > Salve Maior,
> > >
> > > You must be looking at a different church than I. =) My mother's
> > family is traditional Irish Catholic. I can think of few families in
> > my grandparents' generation of less than 10 children (my grandmother
> > had 15 siblings), and my mother had 6 siblings. I can't speak to
> > motives, but I can't argue with the results. It is no coincidence that
> > there are over 1,000,000,000 Catholics. Considering the early Church
> > had no laws against abortion (in fact St. Augustine of Hippo Regius
> > wrote that abortion is not a murder since a fetus would have no soul),
> > I can see no reason for later Church leaders to add it (in the face of
> > previous precedent) except for the obvious benefits of increased
> > manpower. Besides, when you consider that the Church generally frowns
> > upon sexual activity, it becomes even more apparent that this frequent
> > sanctimonious shagging belief was more a matter of convenience than
> > conviction. I will also say that the Church has historically provided
> > support for the orphans that this sort of practice inevitably creates,
> > so hats off for supporting their practice, but I do not think that the
> > anti-abortion (pro-life?) movement is anything intrinsically
> > Judaeo-Christian. Just to keep pumping out missionaries, priests,
> > nuns, monks and crusades one needs a large pool of manpower.
> > >
> > > Vale,
> > > Regulus
> > >
> > >
> > > From: Maior
> > > Sent: Saturday, February 07, 2009 4:54 PM
> > > To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> > > Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Curious non-member with some questions.
> > >
> > >
> > > Salve Regule;
> > > you're not asking why Roman conservatives didn't like it:) They
> > > wanted more Roman boys! A very different attitude than today And
> > > that's the big point I'm tying to make about Republican culture.
> > >
> > > great discussion to have,
> > > valeas Maior
> > >
> > > >
> > > > Salve Maior,
> > > >
> > > > If conservative Romans railed against it then, and conservatives
> > > rail against it now, I don't see why you would make it into a
> > > religious matter. Perhaps it has more to do with conservatives than
> > > religion? =)
> > > >
> > > > I'm sure if you asked a Roman Catholic priest he wouldn't be too
> > > smitten with the idea of abortion of course, but I don't think
> > anyone
> > > would accuse the Catholic church of being overly progressive. Pretty
> > > clear parallels could be drawn between the masses that choose to use
> > > the service, and a conservative portion of the population that
> > > disagrees with it both then and now. I know here in Canada most
> > people
> > > are at least nominally Christian, and yet our public health-care
> > > system permits abortions without embracing Republican values.
> > > >
> > > > Vale,
> > > > Titus Annaeus Regulus
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > From: Maior
> > > > Sent: Saturday, February 07, 2009 4:05 PM
> > > > To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> > > > Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Curious non-member with some questions.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Maior Ricardo quiritibus spd:
> > > > this discussion has inspired me to want Vox Romana to do a piece
> > > > on Bona Dea and her temple in Rome.
> > > > The precincts of this ancient goddess' temple were only open to
> > > > women and Bona Dea's priestesses operated a kind of pharmacy where
> > > > women could obtain abortificants.
> > > >
> > > > I shocked, really freaked out a lot of people on a latin list with
> > > > this knowledge that a common culture existed where abortion was
> > just
> > > > fine and pretty easily obtainable (though conservative Romans
> > would
> > > > rail against it)
> > > >
> > > > So here is a good example of a huge cultural difference between
> > > > Republican polytheistic Rome and moderns with their
> > Judae-Christian
> > > > backgrounds. Of course as Nova Roma we follow Republican Rome!
> > > > optime vale
> > > > M. Hortensia Maior
> > > > Flaminica Carmentalis
> > > > Producer Vox Romana podcast
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > SaIve Ricarde;
> > > > > I'm M. Hortensia Maior producer of Vox Romana podcast, actually
> > > > > Saturninus wrote to me not too long ago about the next podcast,
> > but I
> > > > > was super busy. If you are interested please write to me. I
> > would like
> > > > > to see another one go out.
> > > > >
> > > > > As for just 2 people, I live in Chapel Hill, NC near Duke with 2
> > big
> > > > > classics dept and I was the only Nova Roman here. But I met new
> > civis
> > > > > M. Aelia Connonia and then this last summer Q. Caelia Laeta who
> > > > > joined. Yes we're two but now we meet and study and try to speak
> > Latin
> > > > > together, discuss NR and we're thinking of celebrating maybe the
> > > > > Floralia and having a big party making Roman food and putting up
> > a
> > > > > poster at these departments...So you see you can recruit.
> > > > >
> > > > > Nova Roma is a culture its not the SCA at all.There is no
> > fantasy in
> > > > > what we're doing..
> > > > > If you ignore politics,religio, etc you're missing out on being
> > > > > fully Roman on interacting as a 21st century Roman. We are not
> > RPG we
> > > > > re the rebirth the revival of Roman culture, Roman values in the
> > 21st
> > > > > century. It's a wholistic experience.
> > > > > I hoped I've cleared things up for you. Do write, epistulum mihi
> > > > scrivas
> > > > > valeas
> > > > > Maior
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Rich <wielgosz@> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Sat, 2009-02-07 at 00:57 -0500, A. Tullia Scholastica
> > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > I live east of Syracuse NY. That's the biggest population
> > > > > > > center
> > > > > > > nearest to me.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Scholastica: and there may be some citizens around
> > > > there,
> > > > > > > too, though NYC is a better bet. As earlier, Iâ?Tm here
> > > > too,
> > > > > > > not ALL that far away.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Absolutely. But two people do not exactly make for the kind of
> > > > social
> > > > > > event I was imagining. :-)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > I have communicated with a few people off list, actually. I
> > > > > > > produce a
> > > > > > > podcast and thought I might like to get involved with a
> > > > > > > podcast produced
> > > > > > > by Nova Romans. That collaboration hasn't happened yet.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Scholastica: Nor is it likely. The producer is in grad
> > > > > > > school, and the technical person is busy with two little
> > > > > > > preschool kids and a lot of other things, including a broken
> > > > > > > server for the Academia Thules, which has been our
> > > > educational
> > > > > > > arm, so to speak, though it is technically unrelated to NR.
> > > > > > > There are other issues there as well.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Well, I'm too busy with my podcast to get involved in the
> > production
> > > > > > of another at this time, anyway. Although an OFFICIAL Nova
> > Roma
> > > > podcast
> > > > > > sounds like a great way to increase membership.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Regards,
> > > > > > Rich...
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60945 From: Rich Date: 2009-02-07
Subject: Re: Curious non-member with some questions.
On Sat, 2009-02-07 at 22:33 +0000, Maior wrote:

I get all of the messages. I would have seen it with a different
subject header, as well.

Best,
Rich...

>
> Salve Ricarde;
> I'd considered it, but actually wanted you to read the discussion.
> This is Rome, Roman history; you know the story of Clodius Pulcher and
> how he breached the festivities of Bona Dea....
> Maior
>
> >
> > I don't suppose you would be willing to change the subject header of
> > this fork in the thread please, so I can more easily find the thread
> > that I started?
> >
> > Best,
> > Rich...
> >
> > > Regule;
> > > frankly I don't care that the RC church was/is against birth
> > > control or was for/against abortion. That's a private cultus with
> no
> > > interest to me.
> > > What I'm saying is that this is a good example of Roman culture,
> > > where political conservatives might complain that Roman women were
> not
> > > bearing enough chiidren, What could they do? very little, Except
> > > Augustus who rewarded matrons who had 3 children, you see it's the
> > > state who is involved in this issue in Rome.
> > > optime vale
> > > Maior
> > >
> > > >
> > > > Salve Maior,
> > > >
> > > > You must be looking at a different church than I. =) My mother's
> > > family is traditional Irish Catholic. I can think of few families
> in
> > > my grandparents' generation of less than 10 children (my
> grandmother
> > > had 15 siblings), and my mother had 6 siblings. I can't speak to
> > > motives, but I can't argue with the results. It is no coincidence
> that
> > > there are over 1,000,000,000 Catholics. Considering the early
> Church
> > > had no laws against abortion (in fact St. Augustine of Hippo
> Regius
> > > wrote that abortion is not a murder since a fetus would have no
> soul),
> > > I can see no reason for later Church leaders to add it (in the
> face of
> > > previous precedent) except for the obvious benefits of increased
> > > manpower. Besides, when you consider that the Church generally
> frowns
> > > upon sexual activity, it becomes even more apparent that this
> frequent
> > > sanctimonious shagging belief was more a matter of convenience
> than
> > > conviction. I will also say that the Church has historically
> provided
> > > support for the orphans that this sort of practice inevitably
> creates,
> > > so hats off for supporting their practice, but I do not think that
> the
> > > anti-abortion (pro-life?) movement is anything intrinsically
> > > Judaeo-Christian. Just to keep pumping out missionaries, priests,
> > > nuns, monks and crusades one needs a large pool of manpower.
> > > >
> > > > Vale,
> > > > Regulus
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > From: Maior
> > > > Sent: Saturday, February 07, 2009 4:54 PM
> > > > To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> > > > Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Curious non-member with some questions.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Salve Regule;
> > > > you're not asking why Roman conservatives didn't like it:) They
> > > > wanted more Roman boys! A very different attitude than today And
> > > > that's the big point I'm tying to make about Republican
> culture.
> > > >
> > > > great discussion to have,
> > > > valeas Maior
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Salve Maior,
> > > > >
> > > > > If conservative Romans railed against it then, and
> conservatives
> > > > rail against it now, I don't see why you would make it into a
> > > > religious matter. Perhaps it has more to do with conservatives
> than
> > > > religion? =)
> > > > >
> > > > > I'm sure if you asked a Roman Catholic priest he wouldn't be
> too
> > > > smitten with the idea of abortion of course, but I don't think
> > > anyone
> > > > would accuse the Catholic church of being overly progressive.
> Pretty
> > > > clear parallels could be drawn between the masses that choose to
> use
> > > > the service, and a conservative portion of the population that
> > > > disagrees with it both then and now. I know here in Canada most
> > > people
> > > > are at least nominally Christian, and yet our public health-care
> > > > system permits abortions without embracing Republican values.
> > > > >
> > > > > Vale,
> > > > > Titus Annaeus Regulus
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > From: Maior
> > > > > Sent: Saturday, February 07, 2009 4:05 PM
> > > > > To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> > > > > Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Curious non-member with some
> questions.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Maior Ricardo quiritibus spd:
> > > > > this discussion has inspired me to want Vox Romana to do a
> piece
> > > > > on Bona Dea and her temple in Rome.
> > > > > The precincts of this ancient goddess' temple were only open
> to
> > > > > women and Bona Dea's priestesses operated a kind of pharmacy
> where
> > > > > women could obtain abortificants.
> > > > >
> > > > > I shocked, really freaked out a lot of people on a latin list
> with
> > > > > this knowledge that a common culture existed where abortion
> was
> > > just
> > > > > fine and pretty easily obtainable (though conservative Romans
> > > would
> > > > > rail against it)
> > > > >
> > > > > So here is a good example of a huge cultural difference
> between
> > > > > Republican polytheistic Rome and moderns with their
> > > Judae-Christian
> > > > > backgrounds. Of course as Nova Roma we follow Republican Rome!
> > > > > optime vale
> > > > > M. Hortensia Maior
> > > > > Flaminica Carmentalis
> > > > > Producer Vox Romana podcast
> > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > SaIve Ricarde;
> > > > > > I'm M. Hortensia Maior producer of Vox Romana podcast,
> actually
> > > > > > Saturninus wrote to me not too long ago about the next
> podcast,
> > > but I
> > > > > > was super busy. If you are interested please write to me. I
> > > would like
> > > > > > to see another one go out.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > As for just 2 people, I live in Chapel Hill, NC near Duke
> with 2
> > > big
> > > > > > classics dept and I was the only Nova Roman here. But I met
> new
> > > civis
> > > > > > M. Aelia Connonia and then this last summer Q. Caelia Laeta
> who
> > > > > > joined. Yes we're two but now we meet and study and try to
> speak
> > > Latin
> > > > > > together, discuss NR and we're thinking of celebrating maybe
> the
> > > > > > Floralia and having a big party making Roman food and
> putting up
> > > a
> > > > > > poster at these departments...So you see you can recruit.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Nova Roma is a culture its not the SCA at all.There is no
> > > fantasy in
> > > > > > what we're doing..
> > > > > > If you ignore politics,religio, etc you're missing out on
> being
> > > > > > fully Roman on interacting as a 21st century Roman. We are
> not
> > > RPG we
> > > > > > re the rebirth the revival of Roman culture, Roman values in
> the
> > > 21st
> > > > > > century. It's a wholistic experience.
> > > > > > I hoped I've cleared things up for you. Do write, epistulum
> mihi
> > > > > scrivas
> > > > > > valeas
> > > > > > Maior
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Rich <wielgosz@> wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Sat, 2009-02-07 at 00:57 -0500, A. Tullia Scholastica
> > > wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > I live east of Syracuse NY. That's the biggest
> population
> > > > > > > > center
> > > > > > > > nearest to me.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Scholastica: and there may be some citizens around
> > > > > there,
> > > > > > > > too, though NYC is a better bet. As earlier, Iâ?Tm here
> > > > > too,
> > > > > > > > not ALL that far away.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Absolutely. But two people do not exactly make for the
> kind of
> > > > > social
> > > > > > > event I was imagining. :-)
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > I have communicated with a few people off list,
> actually. I
> > > > > > > > produce a
> > > > > > > > podcast and thought I might like to get involved with a
> > > > > > > > podcast produced
> > > > > > > > by Nova Romans. That collaboration hasn't happened yet.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Scholastica: Nor is it likely. The producer is in grad
> > > > > > > > school, and the technical person is busy with two little
> > > > > > > > preschool kids and a lot of other things, including a
> broken
> > > > > > > > server for the Academia Thules, which has been our
> > > > > educational
> > > > > > > > arm, so to speak, though it is technically unrelated to
> NR.
> > > > > > > > There are other issues there as well.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Well, I'm too busy with my podcast to get involved in the
> > > production
> > > > > > > of another at this time, anyway. Although an OFFICIAL Nova
> > > Roma
> > > > > podcast
> > > > > > > sounds like a great way to increase membership.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Regards,
> > > > > > > Rich...
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
>
>
>
>
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60946 From: Maior Date: 2009-02-07
Subject: Re: Curious non-member with some questions.
Salve sis:
so do you know about Clodius Pulcher?

Maior
>
> I get all of the messages. I would have seen it with a different
> subject header, as well.
>
> Best,
> Rich...
>
> >
> > Salve Ricarde;
> > I'd considered it, but actually wanted you to read the discussion.
> > This is Rome, Roman history; you know the story of Clodius
Pulcher and
> > how he breached the festivities of Bona Dea....
> > Maior
> >
> > >
> > > I don't suppose you would be willing to change the subject
header of
> > > this fork in the thread please, so I can more easily find the
thread
> > > that I started?
> > >
> > > Best,
> > > Rich...
> > >
> > > > Regule;
> > > > frankly I don't care that the RC church was/is against birth
> > > > control or was for/against abortion. That's a private cultus
with
> > no
> > > > interest to me.
> > > > What I'm saying is that this is a good example of Roman
culture,
> > > > where political conservatives might complain that Roman women
were
> > not
> > > > bearing enough chiidren, What could they do? very little,
Except
> > > > Augustus who rewarded matrons who had 3 children, you see
it's the
> > > > state who is involved in this issue in Rome.
> > > > optime vale
> > > > Maior
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Salve Maior,
> > > > >
> > > > > You must be looking at a different church than I. =) My
mother's
> > > > family is traditional Irish Catholic. I can think of few
families
> > in
> > > > my grandparents' generation of less than 10 children (my
> > grandmother
> > > > had 15 siblings), and my mother had 6 siblings. I can't speak
to
> > > > motives, but I can't argue with the results. It is no
coincidence
> > that
> > > > there are over 1,000,000,000 Catholics. Considering the early
> > Church
> > > > had no laws against abortion (in fact St. Augustine of Hippo
> > Regius
> > > > wrote that abortion is not a murder since a fetus would have
no
> > soul),
> > > > I can see no reason for later Church leaders to add it (in the
> > face of
> > > > previous precedent) except for the obvious benefits of
increased
> > > > manpower. Besides, when you consider that the Church generally
> > frowns
> > > > upon sexual activity, it becomes even more apparent that this
> > frequent
> > > > sanctimonious shagging belief was more a matter of convenience
> > than
> > > > conviction. I will also say that the Church has historically
> > provided
> > > > support for the orphans that this sort of practice inevitably
> > creates,
> > > > so hats off for supporting their practice, but I do not think
that
> > the
> > > > anti-abortion (pro-life?) movement is anything intrinsically
> > > > Judaeo-Christian. Just to keep pumping out missionaries,
priests,
> > > > nuns, monks and crusades one needs a large pool of manpower.
> > > > >
> > > > > Vale,
> > > > > Regulus
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > From: Maior
> > > > > Sent: Saturday, February 07, 2009 4:54 PM
> > > > > To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> > > > > Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Curious non-member with some
questions.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Salve Regule;
> > > > > you're not asking why Roman conservatives didn't like it:)
They
> > > > > wanted more Roman boys! A very different attitude than
today And
> > > > > that's the big point I'm tying to make about Republican
> > culture.
> > > > >
> > > > > great discussion to have,
> > > > > valeas Maior
> > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Salve Maior,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > If conservative Romans railed against it then, and
> > conservatives
> > > > > rail against it now, I don't see why you would make it into
a
> > > > > religious matter. Perhaps it has more to do with
conservatives
> > than
> > > > > religion? =)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I'm sure if you asked a Roman Catholic priest he wouldn't
be
> > too
> > > > > smitten with the idea of abortion of course, but I don't
think
> > > > anyone
> > > > > would accuse the Catholic church of being overly
progressive.
> > Pretty
> > > > > clear parallels could be drawn between the masses that
choose to
> > use
> > > > > the service, and a conservative portion of the population
that
> > > > > disagrees with it both then and now. I know here in Canada
most
> > > > people
> > > > > are at least nominally Christian, and yet our public health-
care
> > > > > system permits abortions without embracing Republican
values.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Vale,
> > > > > > Titus Annaeus Regulus
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > From: Maior
> > > > > > Sent: Saturday, February 07, 2009 4:05 PM
> > > > > > To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> > > > > > Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Curious non-member with some
> > questions.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Maior Ricardo quiritibus spd:
> > > > > > this discussion has inspired me to want Vox Romana to do a
> > piece
> > > > > > on Bona Dea and her temple in Rome.
> > > > > > The precincts of this ancient goddess' temple were only
open
> > to
> > > > > > women and Bona Dea's priestesses operated a kind of
pharmacy
> > where
> > > > > > women could obtain abortificants.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I shocked, really freaked out a lot of people on a latin
list
> > with
> > > > > > this knowledge that a common culture existed where
abortion
> > was
> > > > just
> > > > > > fine and pretty easily obtainable (though conservative
Romans
> > > > would
> > > > > > rail against it)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > So here is a good example of a huge cultural difference
> > between
> > > > > > Republican polytheistic Rome and moderns with their
> > > > Judae-Christian
> > > > > > backgrounds. Of course as Nova Roma we follow Republican
Rome!
> > > > > > optime vale
> > > > > > M. Hortensia Maior
> > > > > > Flaminica Carmentalis
> > > > > > Producer Vox Romana podcast
> > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > SaIve Ricarde;
> > > > > > > I'm M. Hortensia Maior producer of Vox Romana podcast,
> > actually
> > > > > > > Saturninus wrote to me not too long ago about the next
> > podcast,
> > > > but I
> > > > > > > was super busy. If you are interested please write to
me. I
> > > > would like
> > > > > > > to see another one go out.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > As for just 2 people, I live in Chapel Hill, NC near
Duke
> > with 2
> > > > big
> > > > > > > classics dept and I was the only Nova Roman here. But I
met
> > new
> > > > civis
> > > > > > > M. Aelia Connonia and then this last summer Q. Caelia
Laeta
> > who
> > > > > > > joined. Yes we're two but now we meet and study and try
to
> > speak
> > > > Latin
> > > > > > > together, discuss NR and we're thinking of celebrating
maybe
> > the
> > > > > > > Floralia and having a big party making Roman food and
> > putting up
> > > > a
> > > > > > > poster at these departments...So you see you can
recruit.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Nova Roma is a culture its not the SCA at all.There is
no
> > > > fantasy in
> > > > > > > what we're doing..
> > > > > > > If you ignore politics,religio, etc you're missing out
on
> > being
> > > > > > > fully Roman on interacting as a 21st century Roman. We
are
> > not
> > > > RPG we
> > > > > > > re the rebirth the revival of Roman culture, Roman
values in
> > the
> > > > 21st
> > > > > > > century. It's a wholistic experience.
> > > > > > > I hoped I've cleared things up for you. Do write,
epistulum
> > mihi
> > > > > > scrivas
> > > > > > > valeas
> > > > > > > Maior
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Rich <wielgosz@> wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On Sat, 2009-02-07 at 00:57 -0500, A. Tullia
Scholastica
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > I live east of Syracuse NY. That's the biggest
> > population
> > > > > > > > > center
> > > > > > > > > nearest to me.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Scholastica: and there may be some citizens around
> > > > > > there,
> > > > > > > > > too, though NYC is a better bet. As earlier, Iâ?
Tm here
> > > > > > too,
> > > > > > > > > not ALL that far away.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Absolutely. But two people do not exactly make for the
> > kind of
> > > > > > social
> > > > > > > > event I was imagining. :-)
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > I have communicated with a few people off list,
> > actually. I
> > > > > > > > > produce a
> > > > > > > > > podcast and thought I might like to get involved
with a
> > > > > > > > > podcast produced
> > > > > > > > > by Nova Romans. That collaboration hasn't happened
yet.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Scholastica: Nor is it likely. The producer is in
grad
> > > > > > > > > school, and the technical person is busy with two
little
> > > > > > > > > preschool kids and a lot of other things, including
a
> > broken
> > > > > > > > > server for the Academia Thules, which has been our
> > > > > > educational
> > > > > > > > > arm, so to speak, though it is technically
unrelated to
> > NR.
> > > > > > > > > There are other issues there as well.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Well, I'm too busy with my podcast to get involved in
the
> > > > production
> > > > > > > > of another at this time, anyway. Although an OFFICIAL
Nova
> > > > Roma
> > > > > > podcast
> > > > > > > > sounds like a great way to increase membership.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Regards,
> > > > > > > > Rich...
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60947 From: Titus Annaeus Regulus Date: 2009-02-07
Subject: Regulus & Maior Conversation was [ Re: Curious non-member with some
Salve Maior,
 
Haha, well it started out as depicting the 'huge difference between Judaeo-Christian and Republican Roman' views on abortion (regardless of what you are saying now, because I agree it is an interesting tidbit of Roman culture) and the RC church represents the majority of Judaeo-Christians (in a numerical sense) so I hardly think we can have a decent discussion if you refuse to consider the majority of the people you made the comment about. My point was simply that it is not a matter of religious necessity for the Christian world either, but of princes and bishops having the same desire as Roman aristocracy; more hands to hold plows and swords. The fact that they managed to get it introduced as part of religion (which is much harder to change than rational decisions) makes it all the more effective, but doesn't represent anything other than the exact same motives as Roman aristocrats and different circumstances. Besides, as I'm constantly told, the Roman State and Religion were inextricably intertwined and so if you say the State controlled it, then I assume the Religio would have had much influence as well.
 
Regulus

From: Maior
Sent: Saturday, February 07, 2009 6:47 PM
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Curious non-member with some questions.

Regule;
frankly I don't care that the RC church was/is against birth
control or was for/against abortion. That's a private cultus with no
interest to me.
What I'm saying is that this is a good example of Roman culture,
where political conservatives might complain that Roman women were not
bearing enough chiidren, What could they do? very little, Except
Augustus who rewarded matrons who had 3 children, you see it's the
state who is involved in this issue in Rome.
optime vale
Maior

>
> Salve Maior,
>
> You must be
looking at a different church than I. =) My mother's
family is traditional Irish Catholic. I can think of few families in
my grandparents' generation of less than 10 children (my grandmother
had 15 siblings), and my mother had 6 siblings. I can't speak to
motives, but I can't argue with the results. It is no coincidence that
there are over 1,000,000,000 Catholics. Considering the early Church
had no laws against abortion (in fact St. Augustine of Hippo Regius
wrote that abortion is not a murder since a fetus would have no soul),
I can see no reason for later Church leaders to add it (in the face of
previous precedent) except for the obvious benefits of increased
manpower. Besides, when you consider that the Church generally frowns
upon sexual activity, it becomes even more apparent that this frequent
sanctimonious shagging belief was more a matter of convenience than
conviction. I will also say that the Church has historically provided
support for the orphans that this sort of practice inevitably creates,
so hats off for supporting their practice, but I do not think that the
anti-abortion (pro-life?) movement is anything intrinsically
Judaeo-Christian. Just to keep pumping out missionaries, priests,
nuns, monks and crusades one needs a large pool of manpower.
>
> Vale,
> Regulus
>
>
> From: Maior
>
Sent: Saturday, February 07, 2009 4:54 PM
> To:
href="mailto:Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com">Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com
> Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Curious non-member with some
questions.
>
>
> Salve Regule;
> you're not asking why
Roman conservatives didn't like it:) They
> wanted more Roman boys! A very
different attitude than today And
> that's the big point I'm tying to make
about Republican culture.
>
> great discussion to have,
>
valeas Maior
>
> >
> > Salve Maior,
> >
> > If conservative Romans railed against it then, and
conservatives
> rail against it now, I don't see why you would make it
into a
> religious matter. Perhaps it has more to do with conservatives
than
> religion? =)
> >
> > I'm sure if you asked a
Roman Catholic priest he wouldn't be too
> smitten with the idea of
abortion of course, but I don't think anyone
> would accuse the Catholic
church of being overly progressive. Pretty
> clear parallels could be
drawn between the masses that choose to use
> the service, and a
conservative portion of the population that
> disagrees with it both then
and now. I know here in Canada most people
> are at least nominally
Christian, and yet our public health-care
> system permits abortions
without embracing Republican values.
> >
> > Vale,
> > Titus Annaeus Regulus
> >
> >
> > From: Maior
> > Sent: Saturday, February 07, 2009 4:05 PM
> > To:
href="mailto:Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com">Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com
> > Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Curious non-member with some
questions.
> >
> >
> > Maior Ricardo quiritibus
spd:
> > this discussion has inspired me to want Vox Romana to do a
piece
> > on Bona Dea and her temple in Rome.
> > The
precincts of this ancient goddess' temple were only open to
> > women
and Bona Dea's priestesses operated a kind of pharmacy where
> > women
could obtain abortificants.
> >
> > I shocked, really freaked
out a lot of people on a latin list with
> > this knowledge that a
common culture existed where abortion was just
> > fine and pretty
easily obtainable (though conservative Romans would
> > rail against
it)
> >
> > So here is a good example of a huge cultural
difference between
> > Republican polytheistic Rome and moderns with
their Judae-Christian
> > backgrounds. Of course as Nova Roma we follow
Republican Rome!
> > optime vale
> > M. Hortensia
Maior
> > Flaminica Carmentalis
> > Producer Vox Romana
podcast
> >
> > >
> > > SaIve Ricarde;
> > > I'm M. Hortensia Maior producer of Vox Romana podcast,
actually
> > > Saturninus wrote to me not too long ago about the
next podcast,
but I
> > > was super busy. If you are interested
please write to me. I
would like
> > > to see another one go
out.
> > >
> > > As for just 2 people, I live in Chapel
Hill, NC near Duke with 2 big
> > > classics dept and I was the only
Nova Roman here. But I met new
civis
> > > M. Aelia Connonia and
then this last summer Q. Caelia Laeta who
> > > joined. Yes we're
two but now we meet and study and try to speak
Latin
> > >
together, discuss NR and we're thinking of celebrating maybe the
> > > Floralia and having a big party making Roman food and putting up a
> > > poster at these departments. ..So you see you can recruit.
> > >
> > > Nova Roma is a culture its not the SCA at all.There
is no fantasy in
> > > what we're doing..
> > > If you
ignore politics,religio, etc you're missing out on being
> > > fully
Roman on interacting as a 21st century Roman. We are not
RPG we
> > > re the rebirth the revival of Roman culture, Roman values in
the
21st
> > > century. It's a wholistic experience.
> > > I hoped I've cleared things up for you. Do write, epistulum mihi
> > scrivas
> > > valeas
> > > Maior
> > >
> > >
> > > In
href="mailto:Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com">Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com, Rich <wielgosz@> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On
Sat, 2009-02-07 at 00:57 -0500, A. Tullia Scholastica wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > I live east of Syracuse NY. That's the biggest
population
> > > > > center
> > > > >
nearest to me.
> > > > >
> > > > >
Scholastica: and there may be some citizens around
> > there,
> > > > > too, though NYC is a better bet. As earlier, Iâ?Tm
here
> > too,
> > > > > not ALL that far away.
> > > >
> > > > Absolutely. But two people do
not exactly make for the kind of
> > social
> > > >
event I was imagining. :-)
> > > >
> > > > > I
have communicated with a few people off list, actually. I
> > > > > produce a
> > > > > podcast and thought I might like to
get involved with a
> > > > > podcast produced
> > > > > by Nova Romans. That collaboration hasn't happened yet.
> > > > >
> > > > > Scholastica: Nor is it likely.
The producer is in grad
> > > > > school, and the technical
person is busy with two little
> > > > > preschool kids and a
lot of other things, including a broken
> > > > > server for
the Academia Thules, which has been our
> > educational
> > > > > arm, so to speak, though it is technically unrelated to
NR.
> > > > > There are other issues there as well.
> > > >
> > > > Well, I'm too busy with my podcast to get
involved in the
production
> > > > of another at this time,
anyway. Although an OFFICIAL Nova Roma
> > podcast
> > > > sounds like a great way to increase membership.
> > > >
> > > > Regards,
> > > > Rich...
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60948 From: Maior Date: 2009-02-07
Subject: Bona Dea and Roman culture [Regulus & Maior Conversation]
Salve Regule;
Republican Rome wasn't a secular society like France nor was it a
theocracy. It's true senators were pontifexes and augurs but old
cults could not be changed, Romans had a deep reverence for ancient
practice. So not even the Senate would not, could not interfere with
the priestesses of Bona Dea.
In your discussion of your family cultus, I'm at a total cultural
loss and an intellectual one. I do know until fairly recently Western
culture equated sexuality with evil, forbid birth control and
abortion as well as divorce. If it was that calculated it was deeply
shrewd.
It only came around 1998 to Ireland! perhaps Livia Plauta or Albucius
or Dexter will be able to further the conversation; I've retitled it
to invite further discussion. Fascinating topic.
optime vale
Maior

> Salve Maior,
>
> Haha, well it started out as depicting the 'huge difference between
Judaeo-Christian and Republican Roman' views on abortion (regardless
of what you are saying now, because I agree it is an interesting
tidbit of Roman culture) and the RC church represents the majority of
Judaeo-Christians (in a numerical sense) so I hardly think we can
have a decent discussion if you refuse to consider the majority of
the people you made the comment about. My point was simply that it is
not a matter of religious necessity for the Christian world either,
but of princes and bishops having the same desire as Roman
aristocracy; more hands to hold plows and swords. The fact that they
managed to get it introduced as part of religion (which is much
harder to change than rational decisions) makes it all the more
effective, but doesn't represent anything other than the exact same
motives as Roman aristocrats and different circumstances. Besides, as
I'm constantly told, the Roman State and Religion were inextricably
intertwined and so if you say the State controlled it, then I assume
the Religio would have had much influence as well.
>
> Regulus
>
>
> From: Maior
> Sent: Saturday, February 07, 2009 6:47 PM
> To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Curious non-member with some questions.
>
>
> Regule;
> frankly I don't care that the RC church was/is against birth
> control or was for/against abortion. That's a private cultus with no
> interest to me.
> What I'm saying is that this is a good example of Roman culture,
> where political conservatives might complain that Roman women were
not
> bearing enough chiidren, What could they do? very little, Except
> Augustus who rewarded matrons who had 3 children, you see it's the
> state who is involved in this issue in Rome.
> optime vale
> Maior
>
> >
> > Salve Maior,
> >
> > You must be looking at a different church than I. =) My mother's
> family is traditional Irish Catholic. I can think of few families in
> my grandparents' generation of less than 10 children (my grandmother
> had 15 siblings), and my mother had 6 siblings. I can't speak to
> motives, but I can't argue with the results. It is no coincidence
that
> there are over 1,000,000,000 Catholics. Considering the early Church
> had no laws against abortion (in fact St. Augustine of Hippo Regius
> wrote that abortion is not a murder since a fetus would have no
soul),
> I can see no reason for later Church leaders to add it (in the face
of
> previous precedent) except for the obvious benefits of increased
> manpower. Besides, when you consider that the Church generally
frowns
> upon sexual activity, it becomes even more apparent that this
frequent
> sanctimonious shagging belief was more a matter of convenience than
> conviction. I will also say that the Church has historically
provided
> support for the orphans that this sort of practice inevitably
creates,
> so hats off for supporting their practice, but I do not think that
the
> anti-abortion (pro-life?) movement is anything intrinsically
> Judaeo-Christian. Just to keep pumping out missionaries, priests,
> nuns, monks and crusades one needs a large pool of manpower.
> >
> > Vale,
> > Regulus
> >
> >
> > From: Maior
> > Sent: Saturday, February 07, 2009 4:54 PM
> > To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> > Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Curious non-member with some questions.
> >
> >
> > Salve Regule;
> > you're not asking why Roman conservatives didn't like it:) They
> > wanted more Roman boys! A very different attitude than today And
> > that's the big point I'm tying to make about Republican culture.
> >
> > great discussion to have,
> > valeas Maior
> >
> > >
> > > Salve Maior,
> > >
> > > If conservative Romans railed against it then, and conservatives
> > rail against it now, I don't see why you would make it into a
> > religious matter. Perhaps it has more to do with conservatives
than
> > religion? =)
> > >
> > > I'm sure if you asked a Roman Catholic priest he wouldn't be too
> > smitten with the idea of abortion of course, but I don't think
anyone
> > would accuse the Catholic church of being overly progressive.
Pretty
> > clear parallels could be drawn between the masses that choose to
use
> > the service, and a conservative portion of the population that
> > disagrees with it both then and now. I know here in Canada most
people
> > are at least nominally Christian, and yet our public health-care
> > system permits abortions without embracing Republican values.
> > >
> > > Vale,
> > > Titus Annaeus Regulus
> > >
> > >
> > > From: Maior
> > > Sent: Saturday, February 07, 2009 4:05 PM
> > > To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> > > Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Curious non-member with some questions.
> > >
> > >
> > > Maior Ricardo quiritibus spd:
> > > this discussion has inspired me to want Vox Romana to do a piece
> > > on Bona Dea and her temple in Rome.
> > > The precincts of this ancient goddess' temple were only open to
> > > women and Bona Dea's priestesses operated a kind of pharmacy
where
> > > women could obtain abortificants.
> > >
> > > I shocked, really freaked out a lot of people on a latin list
with
> > > this knowledge that a common culture existed where abortion was
just
> > > fine and pretty easily obtainable (though conservative Romans
would
> > > rail against it)
> > >
> > > So here is a good example of a huge cultural difference between
> > > Republican polytheistic Rome and moderns with their Judae-
Christian
> > > backgrounds. Of course as Nova Roma we follow Republican Rome!
> > > optime vale
> > > M. Hortensia Maior
> > > Flaminica Carmentalis
> > > Producer Vox Romana podcast
> > >
> > > >
> > > > SaIve Ricarde;
> > > > I'm M. Hortensia Maior producer of Vox Romana podcast,
actually
> > > > Saturninus wrote to me not too long ago about the next
podcast,
> but I
> > > > was super busy. If you are interested please write to me. I
> would like
> > > > to see another one go out.
> > > >
> > > > As for just 2 people, I live in Chapel Hill, NC near Duke
with 2 big
> > > > classics dept and I was the only Nova Roman here. But I met
new
> civis
> > > > M. Aelia Connonia and then this last summer Q. Caelia Laeta
who
> > > > joined. Yes we're two but now we meet and study and try to
speak
> Latin
> > > > together, discuss NR and we're thinking of celebrating maybe
the
> > > > Floralia and having a big party making Roman food and putting
up a
> > > > poster at these departments...So you see you can recruit.
> > > >
> > > > Nova Roma is a culture its not the SCA at all.There is no
fantasy in
> > > > what we're doing..
> > > > If you ignore politics,religio, etc you're missing out on
being
> > > > fully Roman on interacting as a 21st century Roman. We are not
> RPG we
> > > > re the rebirth the revival of Roman culture, Roman values in
the
> 21st
> > > > century. It's a wholistic experience.
> > > > I hoped I've cleared things up for you. Do write, epistulum
mihi
> > > scrivas
> > > > valeas
> > > > Maior
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Rich <wielgosz@> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > On Sat, 2009-02-07 at 00:57 -0500, A. Tullia Scholastica
wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > I live east of Syracuse NY. That's the biggest population
> > > > > > center
> > > > > > nearest to me.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Scholastica: and there may be some citizens around
> > > there,
> > > > > > too, though NYC is a better bet. As earlier, Iâ?Tm here
> > > too,
> > > > > > not ALL that far away.
> > > > >
> > > > > Absolutely. But two people do not exactly make for the kind
of
> > > social
> > > > > event I was imagining. :-)
> > > > >
> > > > > > I have communicated with a few people off list, actually.
I
> > > > > > produce a
> > > > > > podcast and thought I might like to get involved with a
> > > > > > podcast produced
> > > > > > by Nova Romans. That collaboration hasn't happened yet.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Scholastica: Nor is it likely. The producer is in grad
> > > > > > school, and the technical person is busy with two little
> > > > > > preschool kids and a lot of other things, including a
broken
> > > > > > server for the Academia Thules, which has been our
> > > educational
> > > > > > arm, so to speak, though it is technically unrelated to
NR.
> > > > > > There are other issues there as well.
> > > > >
> > > > > Well, I'm too busy with my podcast to get involved in the
> production
> > > > > of another at this time, anyway. Although an OFFICIAL Nova
Roma
> > > podcast
> > > > > sounds like a great way to increase membership.
> > > > >
> > > > > Regards,
> > > > > Rich...
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60949 From: t.ovidius_aquila Date: 2009-02-08
Subject: Re: Curious non-member with some questions.
>
> Politics interest me in real life, and I am very active locally. That
> being said, I do want Nova Roma to be something of an escape for me.
>

Salve


Maybe you are looking for a RPG type society or group. Nova Roma is
more of a lifestyle to me. It isn't an escape at all nor do I feel it
should be.

A passion to live 'like a Roman', maybe but escape? No. I suppose it
can be whatever you make it or want it to be however.

I think you will find most of the people here are fairly serious about
our ideals and do not look at it as roleplay.


Vale -

T. Ovidius Aquila
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60950 From: Rich Date: 2009-02-08
Subject: Re: Curious non-member with some questions.
On Sun, 2009-02-08 at 05:04 +0000, t.ovidius_aquila wrote:

You're the second person to assign the words "role-play" or "RPG" to
me, when I never used them.

I'll thank you to not put words in my mouth. :-)

Best,
Rich...


> >
> > Politics interest me in real life, and I am very active locally.
> That
> > being said, I do want Nova Roma to be something of an escape for
> me.
> >
>
> Salve
>
> Maybe you are looking for a RPG type society or group. Nova Roma is
> more of a lifestyle to me. It isn't an escape at all nor do I feel it
> should be.
>
> A passion to live 'like a Roman', maybe but escape? No. I suppose it
> can be whatever you make it or want it to be however.
>
> I think you will find most of the people here are fairly serious about
> our ideals and do not look at it as roleplay.
>
> Vale -
>
> T. Ovidius Aquila
>
>
>
>
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60951 From: Annia Minucia Marcella Date: 2009-02-08
Subject: Re: Curious non-member with some questions.
Salve,

Except you referenced the SCA(a lot) which is most definitely a role-playing organization.


I'll thank you not to compare us to renfaire characters like Lord Seamus of the Kingdom of Caid.
Vale
- Annia Minucia Marcella

http://minucia.ciarin.com


Rich wrote:

On Sun, 2009-02-08 at 05:04 +0000, t.ovidius_aquila wrote:

You're the second person to assign the words "role-play" or "RPG" to
me, when I never used them.

I'll thank you to not put words in my mouth. :-)

Best,
Rich...


Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60952 From: Stefn Ullerius Venator Piperbarbus Date: 2009-02-08
Subject: Rich's original questions, was Re: Curious non-member with some ques
Ave Rich;

Long time citizen here, who is sometimes slow to enter conversations.

On Fri, Feb 6, 2009 at 2:01 PM, Rich wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> I have been considering joining Nova Roma for some time now, have been
> observing this list for a while (more than a year, maybe two) and have
> some questions:

Venii: I quite respect someone who observes for awhile and then
"enters a hall" with questions.

> 1) I have noticed one or two references from people who are in both the
> SCA, and Nova Roma. I once considered joining the SCA, but alas did
> not. Is Nova Roma like the SCA in that there are local chapters and
> occasional meetings? Although I have little interest in joining the
> SCA, they do have a local Barony, and they do have local meetings.

Venii: I have been a member or participant in SCA activities since
the middle of 1978. In fact, I started out in '68 or '69 in American
Revolution re-creation and have participated in Fur-Trade Era,
American Civil War and WW II re-creations, also.

I have been a Cives Nova Roma since July, 1998.

There is quite a bit of difference between the two.

The SCA is not so much a re-creation of the period of time
pre-midnight 31 December 1600 as it is a recreational society, which
has education about pre-17th century western Europe and societies,
which could have come into contact therewith, as a main goal. Just
look at the SCA Corpora, in paraphrase, make some good attempt at
pre-17th century appearance and behavior.

Nova Roma is much more striving to be a re-creation of that Rome,
which speaks to our better nature: republican ideals, civic and
private virtues, duty to the community, an accurate revival of the
Cultus Romana and so forth.

Cives Nova Roma are pretty well dispersed, I think the closest to me
are at least 1 1/2 - 2 hours away. This will change as we build the
New City.

> 2) When you talk of "Taxes" on this list, are you referring to a
> membership fee for joining Nova Roma?

Venii: As others have answered, our "taxes" are membership fees.

> 3) What are the benefits of membership? Is there anything other than
> being a member of a community with fellow people who appreciate Roman
> history and culture? Is there at the very least a membership
> card? :-)
>
> I'm sure more questions will come to me, but these are the obvious
> ones.
>
> Best Regards,
> Rich...

Venii: Well, becoming a paid up Citizen entitles you to take up more
of the burden of building Nova Roma into something much more engaging
in our everyday lives. If you want to hold office, you must be a
paid-up Citizen.

As for a membership card, almost 11 years and I do not have one, nor
do I need one. I do have a Nova Roma flag (the small one created
several years ago), quite a few of both sesterces issued thus far,
printed at my own expense 200 copies of a book I wrote on making mead
and donated the proceeds to Nova Roma from selling them (late 1998 -
early 2000)...the sodality I founded is the oldest in continuous
operation (see my sig block).

> P.S.
> I already own a well made Toga.
>

One item of apparel I have not yet made for myself, though I do have a
nifty, fully-lined, parti-coloured bliaut that I sewed up 50 pounds
ago ,-)

By the way, welcome to Nova Roma.

=====================================
In amicitia et fide
Publius Ullerius Stephanus Venator
Civis circa Quintilis MMDCCLI a.u.c.
Senator et Lictor
Scriba - Aedilican Cohors
Patrician, Paterfamilias
Religio Septentrionalis - Poeta

Dominus Sodalitas Coquuorum et Cerevisiae Coctorum
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Sodalis_Coq_et_Coq/

http://www.myspace.com/venator_poetus
http://anheathenreader.blogspot.com/
http://www.catamount-grange-hearth.org/
http://www.cafepress.com/catamountgrange
--
May the Holy Powers smile on our efforts.
May the Spirits of our family lines nod in approval.
May we be of Worth to our fellow Nova Romans.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60953 From: Rich Date: 2009-02-08
Subject: Re: Curious non-member with some questions.
On Sun, 2009-02-08 at 00:44 -0500, Annia Minucia Marcella wrote:

> Salve,
>
> Except you referenced the SCA(a lot) which is most definitely a
> role-playing organization.

Perhaps.

> I'll thank you not to compare us to renfaire characters like Lord
> Seamus of the Kingdom of Caid.

I don't recall comparing you to any characters at all.

Best,
Rich...
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60954 From: Annia Minucia Marcella Date: 2009-02-08
Subject: Re: Curious non-member with some questions.
Salve,

Then perhaps you should reread your OP. Is there a reason you wanted to use the SCA to compare this organization rather than organizations like the ODOB, or The Troth, or other reconstructionist groups? If we were a reenactor org, your comparison would fit, we're not so it doesn't. Furthermore many of us dislike attempts at claiming this is all just pretend, and your SCA comparison implies exactly that(hence the replies that clearly state we are not an rpg).


Vale
- Annia Minucia Marcella

http://minucia.ciarin.com


Rich wrote:

On Sun, 2009-02-08 at 00:44 -0500, Annia Minucia Marcella wrote:

> Salve,
>
> Except you referenced the SCA(a lot) which is most definitely a
> role-playing organization.

Perhaps.

> I'll thank you not to compare us to renfaire characters like Lord
> Seamus of the Kingdom of Caid.

I don't recall comparing you to any characters at all.

Best,
Rich...

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60955 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2009-02-08
Subject: Re: OT to ATS: did this work? was: Re: [Nova-Roma] Curious non-membe
Re: OT to ATS: did this work? was: Re: [Nova-Roma] Curious non-member with some questions.
Scholastica Scaevae optimae suae S.P.D.
 

Salve Scholastica,

good to read your message on this list! I dropped you a private email on Jan
22 to which you never responded. Did you receive it?

    Ignoscas, quaeso; accepi, sed respondere nequivi.  Obruta acervo pensorum corrigendorum nivium removendarum sum.  Spero me mox responsuram.  

Vale bene!

P. Aemilia Scaeva

Et tu!

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60956 From: Metrobius Date: 2009-02-08
Subject: Re: Regulus & Maior Conversation was [ Re: Curious non-member with s
Sempronia Pulla Regulo Omnibusque

--- On Sun, 2/8/09, Titus Annaeus Regulus <t.annaevsregvlvs@...> wrote:
From: Titus Annaeus Regulus <t.annaevsregvlvs@...>
Besides, as I'm constantly told, the Roman State and Religion were inextricably intertwined and so if you say the State controlled it, then I assume the Religio would have had much influence as well.


In general, abortion was sometimes used as a point to differentiate between "true religion" and paganism in the early days of Christianity and Islam. You will read things like, "What crime did the female child commit for her to have been buried?" (in the Qur'an...before Islam Abu Bakr had buried one of his daughters and remarked how she had grabbed onto his finger while he was doing it) What that means is that it was seen in the sphere of religion, although it is not a religious act. It's probably along the lines that Christianity and Islam were trying to influence how one practices their life, while that realm for many pagans was personal--them exposing/burying their daughters because it became other people did it not because religion dictated it. So, I suppose it depends on one's perspective.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60957 From: belovedmetrobius Date: 2009-02-08
Subject: Clodius Pulcher was RE: Curious non-member with some questions.
Sempronia Pulla Maori Omnibusque

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Maior" <rory12001@...> wrote:
> This is Rome, Roman history; you know the story of Clodius Pulcher and
> how he breached the festivities of Bona Dea....
> Maior

No resisting the blood of Sulla...or women's clothing. ;)

(sorry, it was too easy for me to say ^_^)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60958 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2009-02-08
Subject: Regulus & Maior Conversation was [ Re: Curious non-member with some
Cato omnes in foro SPD

Salvete.

Remember that the Romans and Greeks thought that exposing a newborn
child to the elements and allowing it to die was perfectly
acceptable, even if its only crime was to be born female; just
because an activity was in fact practiced does *not* make it
acceptable or moral. I would not, if I were Maior, go trumpeting
the fact that an activity that many find morally unacceptable was a
big selling point in the worship of the Bona Dea. I am not
surprised that some on the Latin List were ... "shocked".

Regulus, you'll have to get used to Maior. Every single ill that
could possibly befall the human race - or has ever already befallen
it - will, in her experience, find its root cause in Christianity; I
think she throws the "Judeo" bit on the front to appear more
moderate than she actually is. What she seems to forget is that,
like Satanists celebrating a "Black Mass" in mockery of the real
one, her railings only give proof to the power inherent in the thing
mocked.

Like Dan Brown, she also consistently forgets that the Roman
Catholic church is a relative newbie - the Eastern Orthodox Church
was around and running for a couple of centuries before the Roman
church stuck its toe in the authority-figure waters. True that it
was some early Fathers and a couple of bishops of Rome that gave
traction to the idea of sex being somehow unclean, but the general
subjugation of women in society is an incredibly far older practice
than that, spanning across the arc of recorded history. This
doesn't mean it's acceptable, just that it is a fact of history.

Valete,

Cato
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60959 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2009-02-08
Subject: Re: Curious non-member with some questions.
Cato Rich omnibusque in foro SPD

Salve Rich et salvete omnes.

The questions you ask are reasonable, and they go through all of our
minds at one time or another over the course of time. The most
basic one of course is: what does it mean to be a citizen of this
Respublica while living in the... "outside" world?

You are getting a lot of answers. From the wildly inappropriate
(being a Roman means we get to worship the Bona Dea which is
excellent because that way you can feel historically justified in
getting an abortion) to the relatively dry (you don't get a
membership card because we don't want to pay for postage) - you are
seeing a community at work. We have had occasions to meet face to
face, but these are relatively few and far between.

Those occasions are, however, absolutely worth it. As a citizen, I
have learned an incredible amount about Roman law and government,
about political theory and practice, about bigotry and narrow-
mindedness, and about polytheism and my own faith. I have worn a
toga on several occasions with other citizens - not as a costume but
as a Roman would, as a mark of my citizenship. I have eaten and
drunk with citizens, argued constitutional law, and helped design a
coin.

In the end, of course, nothing can replace the actual physical
interaction that takes place in normal human communities. It is a
matter of putting yourself into the mental space that fills the gap
between what is and what could be that makes the difference, and
will ultimately impress upon you whether or not you wish to join.

Vale et valete,

Cato
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60960 From: Rich Date: 2009-02-08
Subject: Re: Curious non-member with some questions.
On Sun, 2009-02-08 at 01:34 -0500, Annia Minucia Marcella wrote:

There was no direct comparison, other than to show that you were two
groups that have people with a common interest, so please stop putting
words in my mouth.

In my "OP" I only asked if you had branches or local chapters like the
SCA. So perhaps it is you who needs to look at that message.

I have not even heard of the other groups you mentioned.

I must confess that I am completely baffled. In my attempts to learn
more about NR, I have gotten two posts from people whose apparent only
intent was to create drama where there was none. Except for perhaps in
their own imaginings.

Best,
Rich...

> Salve,
>
> Then perhaps you should reread your OP. Is there a reason you wanted
> to use the SCA to compare this organization rather than organizations
> like the ODOB, or The Troth, or other reconstructionist groups? If we
> were a reenactor org, your comparison would fit, we're not so it
> doesn't. Furthermore many of us dislike attempts at claiming this is
> all just pretend, and your SCA comparison implies exactly that(hence
> the replies that clearly state we are not an rpg).
>
>
>
>
> Vale
> - Annia Minucia Marcella
>
> http://minucia.ciarin.com
>
>
> Rich wrote:
> > On Sun, 2009-02-08 at 00:44 -0500, Annia Minucia Marcella wrote:
> >
> > > Salve,
> > >
> > > Except you referenced the SCA(a lot) which is most definitely a
> > > role-playing organization.
> >
> > Perhaps.
> >
> > > I'll thank you not to compare us to renfaire characters like Lord
> > > Seamus of the Kingdom of Caid.
> >
> > I don't recall comparing you to any characters at all.
> >
> > Best,
> > Rich...
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60961 From: Metrobius Date: 2009-02-08
Subject: Re: Regulus & Maior Conversation was [ Re: Curious non-member with s
Salve Cato et Omnes,

--- On Sun, 2/8/09, Gaius Equitius Cato <mlcinnyc@...> wrote:
From: Gaius Equitius Cato <mlcinnyc@...>
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Regulus & Maior Conversation was [ Re: Curious

Every single ill that could possibly befall the human race - or has ever already befallen it - will, in her experience, find its root cause in Christianity; I think she throws the "Judeo" bit on the front to appear more moderate than she actually is.

I'm not Christian and I don't know Maior and have no interest in slamming others or any religion or lack thereof, but whether she does it or not, in my short time on earth I've noticed that a lot of people in general do fall into that mentality. It's frustrating. I guess having a scapegoat makes things easier to explain.

Bene Valete,
M Sempronia Pulla
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60962 From: Metrobius Date: 2009-02-08
Subject: Re: Curious non-member with some questions.
Salve Rich,

--- On Sun, 2/8/09, Rich <wielgosz@...> wrote:
From: Rich <wielgosz@...>
I must confess that I am completely baffled. In my attempts to learn
more about NR, I have gotten two posts from people whose apparent only
intent was to create drama where there was none. Except for perhaps in
their own imaginings.

That's the internet for you, which is why I stand with you in preferring real world things. I'm also in your province, though I'm one of those in the DC area. But, I can say this: I've already been to one event and it was a lot of fun and the people were real nice. It was like any other kind of meeting...no snark or drama that is commonplace when you're dealing with all types of people in forums or groups.

Bene Vale,
M Sempronia Pulla
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60963 From: Metrobius Date: 2009-02-08
Subject: Re: Curious non-member with some questions.
Salvete,

--- On Sun, 2/8/09, Gaius Equitius Cato <mlcinnyc@...> wrote:
From: Gaius Equitius Cato <mlcinnyc@...>
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Curious non-member with some questions.
>(being a Roman means we get to worship the Bona Dea which is
>excellent because that way you can feel historically justified in
>getting an abortion)

....or committing suicide as I was introduced to heh *ducks*

Bene Valete,
Sempronia Pulla
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60964 From: marcushoratius Date: 2009-02-08
Subject: a. d. VI Eidus Februariae: Februa; dies natalis Quirini
M. Moravius Piscinus Quiritibus et omnibus salutem plurimam dicit:
Bene omnibus nobis

Hodie est ante diem VI Eidus Februariae; haec dies nefastus est: dies
natalis Quirini

"Windy tempests (this way comes)." ~ Columella, De Re Rustica 9.2.16

"The fathers of Rome called purification februa. Many things still
indicate that meaning for the word. The pontifices ask the Rex and
the Flamen for woollen fillets, called februa in the ancient tongue.
When houses are cleansed, the roasted grain and salt, the lictor
receives, are called by the same name. The same name too is given to
the branch, cut from a pure tree, whose leaves wreathe the
sacerdotes' holy brows. I've seen the Flaminica (Dialis) ask for
februa, and at her request she was given a branch of pine. In short
anything used to purify our bodies, had that title in the days of our
unshaven ancestors." ~ P. Ovidius Naso, Fasti 2.19-30

February is the month of purification. Varro offers two reasons for
the name of the month, both related to purification, and both
probably correct.

"[According to Servius Fulvius Flaccus, cons. 135 BCE] 'February'
(comes) from the Di inferi, gods of the Underworld, because at that
time expiatory sacrifices are made to them, but I think that it was
called February rather from the dies februatus (Purification Days),
because then the people are purified (februator)." ~ M. Terentius
Varro Reatinus, De Lingua Latina 6.34

Varro also said that februa was a Sabine word. The bough of
the "arbor pura" to which Ovid referred above was laurel. Another
arbor pura is called the Sabine herb. This was savin juniper used
for purification rites by women and offered at wedding ceremonies as
an incense of purification. The Picea (pitch pine, fir, or faux
sapin) is another kind of februa. Pliny mentioned its use in
embalming and as a funereal tree (arbor feralis). It was, and still
is, used instead of frankincense as a cheap substitute. Ovid says
that the flamenica Dialis instead received pinea virga as her
februa. This tree, the pinus pinea, was sacred to Juno, and thus
used in the rites performed by the flamenica Dialis. The The woolen
fillets that Ovid said were received by the pontifices from the Rex
Sacrorum and the flamen Dialis were traditionally made by the virgin
daughters of the latter two sacerdotes. The wooolen fillets were
wound around altars, and worn by sacerdotes, tied around their brows,
to signify a state of ritual purity. Whenever someone died in his or
her house, and most Romans did, the lictores who were assigned to the
flamen Dialis, Vestales, or other sacerdotes, were sent to purify the
house. They did so by casting "mica far" that was similar to the
mola salsa prepared by the Vestales. That is, it was a salted grain
meal, used as a dusting powder and probably then swept up to take
away the impurities. What that really meant was that with the
approach of death, as one lay in his death bed, Manes might gather in
the house. So, like the ceremony that Ovid described for Lemuria, an
offering is first made to the unwanted Manes, then it is swept up and
buried in some appropriate place as an offering to the Di inferni,
and any others who still remained might be chased away with gongs.
Finally, the straps of skin cut from the sacrificial goat and worn by
the lurperci were also called februa. As the luperci ran at
Lupercalia, the februa tied at their wastes, anyone touched by these
straps were purified. And for women, if purified before the Gods,
they would receive divine assistance in becoming fertile. Often the
Lupercalia is misperceived as a fertility ritual, but the only reason
that it be so construed is how the Romans believed, even into the
Christian era, that female purity related to her ability to bear
children. In a sense, it was thought that bearing children was a
proof of a woman's chastity and purity. The purification ritual of
Lupercali, as Varro tells us, was another reason for the name given
to this month. "In short, anything used to purify our bodies" is
called februa.


AUC 328 /325 BCE: The dictator L. Papirius Cursor defeats the
Samnites in the Second Samnite War

"When the health of the army was completely restored he gave battle
to the enemy, both he and his men feeling quite confident of victory,
and he so completely defeated and routed the Samnites that this was
the last occasion on which they ventured on a regular engagement with
the Dictator. After this the victorious army advanced in every
direction where there was any prospect of plunder, but wherever they
marched they found no armed force; they were nowhere openly attacked
or surprised from ambush. They showed all the greater alertness
because the Dictator had issued an order that the whole of the spoil
was to be given to the soldiers; the chance of private gain
stimulated their warlike spirit quite as much as the consciousness
that they were avenging the wrongs of their country. Cowed by these
defeats, the Samnites made overtures for peace and gave the Dictator
an undertaking to supply each of the soldiers with a set of garments
and a year's pay. On his referring them to the senate they replied
that they would follow him to Rome and trust their cause solely to
his honour and rectitude. The army was thereupon withdrawn from
Samnium." ~ Titus Livius 8.36


AUC 460 / 293 BCE: L. Papirius Cursor, son of the dictator, holds a
triumph and dedicates the Temple of Quirinus, vowed by his father,
during the Third Samnite War.

"Everything was now deep in snow, and it was impossible to remain any
longer in the open, so the consul withdrew his army from Samnium. On
his approach to Rome a triumph was granted to him by universal
consent. This triumph, which he celebrated while still in office, was
a very brilliant one for those days. The infantry and cavalry who
marched in the procession were conspicuous with their decorations,
many were wearing civic, mural, and vallarian crowns. The spoils of
the Samnites attracted much attention; their splendour and beauty
were compared with those which the consul's father had won, and which
were familiar to all through their being used as decorations of
public places. Amongst those in the victor's train were some
prisoners of high rank distinguished for their own or their fathers'
military services; there were also carried in the procession
2,533,000 bronze ases, stated to be the proceeds of the sale of the
prisoners, and 1830 pounds of silver taken from the cities. All the
silver and bronze was stored in the treasury, none of this was given
to the soldiers. This created dissatisfaction amongst the plebs,
which was aggravated by the collection of the war tax to provide the
soldiers' pay, for if Papirius had not been so anxious to get the
credit of paying the price of the prisoners into the treasury there
would have been enough to make a gift to the soldiers and also to
furnish their pay. He dedicated the temple of Quirinus. I do not find
in any ancient author that it was he who vowed this temple in the
crisis of a battle, and certainly he could not have completed it in
so short a time; it was vowed by his father when Dictator, and the
son dedicated it when consul. and adorned it with the spoils of the
enemy. There was such a vast quantity of these that not only were the
temple and the Forum adorned with them, but they were distributed
amongst the allied peoples and the nearest colonies to decorate their
public spaces and temples. After his triumph Papirius led his army
into the neighbourhood of Vescia, as that district was still infested
by the Samnites, and there he wintered." ~ Titus Livius 10.46


Our thought for today comes from Epicurus, Vatican 23

"Every friendship in itself is to be desired; but the initial cause
of friendship is from its advantages."
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60965 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2009-02-08
Subject: A reminder from the praetor
Salvete quirites,

We have a guest among us. Many who have responded to his queries have
been courteous and welcoming. Others seem to have forgotten their
manners. I recommend that anyone considering sending a remark that
seems snarky or cutting review the Edictum Sermone, which is
conveniently found in our files section and also appears here every
two weeks.

In particular, since some seem unable to recognize this, the term
"role playing game" or RPG is perceived by many as a dismissive insult
when applied to activities such as reenactment and living history
organizations. It is not for you to compartmentalize or diminish the
activity that someone else engages in.

Valete,

CN-EQVIT-MARINVS
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60966 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2009-02-08
Subject: Re: Curious non-member with some questions.
Cato Semproniae Pullae sal.

HA! very true, I'd forgotten about that little activity.

You bring up something that has plagued the Respublica for at least as
long as I've been around: the balance between doing what the ancient
Romans did and what society has developed into since then.

How far do we go? Where do we draw the line? There are some obvious
ones (slavery, women as chattel, that kind of thing), but what is an
acceptable practice for one citizen may be abhorrent to another, even
if the ancient Romans did it.

It's all very good and easy for someone to stand here and say "be
Roman! Do what the Romans did!" but some of the things the Romans did
were, quite frankly, reprehensible. That's where our ability to use
our noggins comes in.
Vale,

Cato
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60967 From: Annia Minucia Marcella Date: 2009-02-08
Subject: Re: Curious non-member with some questions.
Salve,

No one is putting words in your mouth. I was merely explaining to you why you were receiving replies that said this org is not a role-playing org like the SCA.  You needn't have brought up the SCA at all if you just wanted to ask if we had local chapters and meetings(and since you were lurking on this list for more than a year it's odd that you didn't know the answer already). In fact, by lurking as long as you have I'm surprised you haven't gone to the website which would've answered pretty much all of your questions a long time ago.

In your time spent lurking here, what did you learn exactly?
Vale
- Annia Minucia Marcella

http://minucia.ciarin.com


Rich wrote:

On Sun, 2009-02-08 at 01:34 -0500, Annia Minucia Marcella wrote:

There was no direct comparison, other than to show that you were two
groups that have people with a common interest, so please stop putting
words in my mouth.

In my "OP" I only asked if you had branches or local chapters like the
SCA. So perhaps it is you who needs to look at that message.

I have not even heard of the other groups you mentioned.

I must confess that I am completely baffled. In my attempts to learn
more about NR, I have gotten two posts from people whose apparent only
intent was to create drama where there was none. Except for perhaps in
their own imaginings.

Best,
Rich...

> Salve,
>
> Then perhaps you should reread your OP. Is there a reason you wanted
> to use the SCA to compare this organization rather than organizations
> like the ODOB, or The Troth, or other reconstructionist groups? If we
> were a reenactor org, your comparison would fit, we're not so it
> doesn't. Furthermore many of us dislike attempts at claiming this is
> all just pretend, and your SCA comparison implies exactly that(hence
> the replies that clearly state we are not an rpg).
>
>
>
>
> Vale
> - Annia Minucia Marcella
>
> http://minucia. ciarin.com
>
>
> Rich wrote:
> > On Sun, 2009-02-08 at 00:44 -0500, Annia Minucia Marcella wrote:
> >
> > > Salve,
> > >
> > > Except you referenced the SCA(a lot) which is most definitely a
> > > role-playing organization.
> >
> > Perhaps.
> >
> > > I'll thank you not to compare us to renfaire characters like Lord
> > > Seamus of the Kingdom of Caid.
> >
> > I don't recall comparing you to any characters at all.
> >
> > Best,
> > Rich...
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60968 From: Metrobius Date: 2009-02-08
Subject: Re: Being Roman was RE: Curious non-member with some questions.

And in my opinion part of using one's noggin is to understand context and practice. Why was such and such activity or opinion popular back then? Can it be said that no Roman ever did whatever practice or held whatever opinion?

Bene Vale,
M. Sempronia Pulla

--- On Sun, 2/8/09, Gaius Equitius Cato <mlcinnyc@...> wrote:
From: Gaius Equitius Cato <mlcinnyc@...>
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Curious non-member with some questions.
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Date: Sunday, February 8, 2009, 4:05 PM

Cato Semproniae Pullae sal.

HA! very true, I'd forgotten about that little activity.

You bring up something that has plagued the Respublica for at least as
long as I've been around: the balance between doing what the ancient
Romans did and what society has developed into since then.

How far do we go? Where do we draw the line? There are some obvious
ones (slavery, women as chattel, that kind of thing), but what is an
acceptable practice for one citizen may be abhorrent to another, even
if the ancient Romans did it.

It's all very good and easy for someone to stand here and say "be
Roman! Do what the Romans did!" but some of the things the Romans did
were, quite frankly, reprehensible. That's where our ability to use
our noggins comes in.
Vale,

Cato


Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60969 From: Rich Date: 2009-02-08
Subject: Re: A reminder from the praetor
On Sun, 2009-02-08 at 10:47 -0500, Gnaeus Equitius Marinus wrote:

Salve,

Thank you.

Best,
Rich...


> Salvete quirites,
>
> We have a guest among us. Many who have responded to his queries have
> been courteous and welcoming. Others seem to have forgotten their
> manners. I recommend that anyone considering sending a remark that
> seems snarky or cutting review the Edictum Sermone, which is
> conveniently found in our files section and also appears here every
> two weeks.
>
> In particular, since some seem unable to recognize this, the term
> "role playing game" or RPG is perceived by many as a dismissive
> insult
> when applied to activities such as reenactment and living history
> organizations. It is not for you to compartmentalize or diminish the
> activity that someone else engages in.
>
> Valete,
>
> CN-EQVIT-MARINVS
>
>
>
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60970 From: Rich Date: 2009-02-08
Subject: Re: Curious non-member with some questions.
On Sun, 2009-02-08 at 14:38 +0000, Gaius Equitius Cato wrote:


Salve,

Thank you for your thoughtful reply.

I welcome all reasonable replies to my queries.

I have enjoyed my interactions with all of you in my brief time posting
to this list.

I still want a membership card, however. Leather bound, gilded
edges. ;-)

Best,
Rich...

> Cato Rich omnibusque in foro SPD
>
> Salve Rich et salvete omnes.
>
> The questions you ask are reasonable, and they go through all of our
> minds at one time or another over the course of time. The most
> basic one of course is: what does it mean to be a citizen of this
> Respublica while living in the... "outside" world?
>
> You are getting a lot of answers. From the wildly inappropriate
> (being a Roman means we get to worship the Bona Dea which is
> excellent because that way you can feel historically justified in
> getting an abortion) to the relatively dry (you don't get a
> membership card because we don't want to pay for postage) - you are
> seeing a community at work. We have had occasions to meet face to
> face, but these are relatively few and far between.
>
> Those occasions are, however, absolutely worth it. As a citizen, I
> have learned an incredible amount about Roman law and government,
> about political theory and practice, about bigotry and narrow-
> mindedness, and about polytheism and my own faith. I have worn a
> toga on several occasions with other citizens - not as a costume but
> as a Roman would, as a mark of my citizenship. I have eaten and
> drunk with citizens, argued constitutional law, and helped design a
> coin.
>
> In the end, of course, nothing can replace the actual physical
> interaction that takes place in normal human communities. It is a
> matter of putting yourself into the mental space that fills the gap
> between what is and what could be that makes the difference, and
> will ultimately impress upon you whether or not you wish to join.
>
> Vale et valete,
>
> Cato
>
>
>
>
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60971 From: Rich Date: 2009-02-08
Subject: Re: Rich's original questions, was Re: Curious non-member with some
On Sat, 2009-02-07 at 23:48 -0600, Stefn Ullerius Venator Piperbarbus
wrote:

Greetings,


> Venii: I quite respect someone who observes for awhile and then
> "enters a hall" with questions.

Thanks. Sometimes it's because I fear the words, "RTFM." :-)

> Venii: I have been a member or participant in SCA activities since
> the middle of 1978. In fact, I started out in '68 or '69 in American
> Revolution re-creation and have participated in Fur-Trade Era,
> American Civil War and WW II re-creations, also.
>
> I have been a Cives Nova Roma since July, 1998.
>
> There is quite a bit of difference between the two.
>
> The SCA is not so much a re-creation of the period of time
> pre-midnight 31 December 1600 as it is a recreational society, which
> has education about pre-17th century western Europe and societies,
> which could have come into contact therewith, as a main goal. Just
> look at the SCA Corpora, in paraphrase, make some good attempt at
> pre-17th century appearance and behavior.
>
> Nova Roma is much more striving to be a re-creation of that Rome,
> which speaks to our better nature: republican ideals, civic and
> private virtues, duty to the community, an accurate revival of the
> Cultus Romana and so forth.
>
> Cives Nova Roma are pretty well dispersed, I think the closest to me
> are at least 1 1/2 - 2 hours away. This will change as we build the
> New City.

The new City?

> Venii: Well, becoming a paid up Citizen entitles you to take up more
> of the burden of building Nova Roma into something much more engaging
> in our everyday lives. If you want to hold office, you must be a
> paid-up Citizen.
>
> As for a membership card, almost 11 years and I do not have one, nor
> do I need one. I do have a Nova Roma flag (the small one created
> several years ago), quite a few of both sesterces issued thus far,
> printed at my own expense 200 copies of a book I wrote on making mead
> and donated the proceeds to Nova Roma from selling them (late 1998 -
> early 2000)...the sodality I founded is the oldest in continuous
> operation (see my sig block).

I look forward to participating.

> > I already own a well made Toga.
> >
>
> One item of apparel I have not yet made for myself, though I do have a
> nifty, fully-lined, parti-coloured bliaut that I sewed up 50 pounds
> ago ,-)

I've put on some weight since thanksgiving. Fortunately my tunic is
large enough for my new girth!

> By the way, welcome to Nova Roma.

Thanks.

Best,
Rich...
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60972 From: Maior Date: 2009-02-08
Subject: Re: A reminder from the praetor
Salve;
he's not a 'guest' this isnt a Victorian tea party; it's the forum of
Nova Roma, where cives meet and exchange ideas with vigor, a very
Roman thing to do...
Let him go to New Romans if he's sensitive!
M. Hortensia Maior--



- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Rich <wielgosz@...> wrote:
>
> On Sun, 2009-02-08 at 10:47 -0500, Gnaeus Equitius Marinus wrote:
>
> Salve,
>
> Thank you.
>
> Best,
> Rich...
>
>
> > Salvete quirites,
> >
> > We have a guest among us. Many who have responded to his queries have
> > been courteous and welcoming. Others seem to have forgotten their
> > manners. I recommend that anyone considering sending a remark that
> > seems snarky or cutting review the Edictum Sermone, which is
> > conveniently found in our files section and also appears here every
> > two weeks.
> >
> > In particular, since some seem unable to recognize this, the term
> > "role playing game" or RPG is perceived by many as a dismissive
> > insult
> > when applied to activities such as reenactment and living history
> > organizations. It is not for you to compartmentalize or diminish the
> > activity that someone else engages in.
> >
> > Valete,
> >
> > CN-EQVIT-MARINVS
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60973 From: Titus Annaeus Regulus Date: 2009-02-08
Subject: Re: Bona Dea and Roman culture [Regulus & Maior Conversation]
Salve Maior,
 
I agree it was not a theocracy. I am merely saying that power is power and that in different eras, there were different forms of power, but it was always closely controlled by the influential people of the time. If one is even passingly acquainted with Mediaeval history, the number of 'nullifications' of marriages that were awarded to influential persons is quite surprising even while 'divorce' remained immoral for the common people (as a case in point of convenience vs. conviction). Roman Catholicism is my faith, but I am aware that the Church has been a highly political body throughout its history. The discussion now is purely academic, so by no means feel that I may become offended.
 
Your point on the sanctity of the Bona Dea cult is what caused me to comment earlier that introducing the suppression of abortion as part of religion was a very shrewd maneuver in later ages. Religion has always been a very powerful moral force and can often defy reasoned argument. The main difference being (imo) that in the Republican era, there were many deities and so it would be difficult to affect the moral landscape of the entire culture. In later eras, there was only one large religious institution that dominated the entire Western World. If a Pope decided to ban or suppress a certain practice, it was so. Thus it was that powerful men of the time could approach the Church and request these measures be implemented. It is basically the exact same situation as Augustus rewarding fertile matrons, except for the different time and circumstances. But, as I have said earlier, power is power, and the pragmatism of rulers has been a common theme throughout Western history.
 
I would have to say the Church has been thoroughly influenced by secular concerns throughout its existence. Even the briefest acquaintance with Jesus and His teachings in the Bible would illustrate a complete rejection of violence towards anyone. However the Church has not only condoned war, but instigated them (I.e. the Crusades). You will find that the demands of the present often have had massive influence on the Church' position on its tenets. Thus while I cannot speak with certainty on why a Pope would ban abortion, considering the previous Church's acceptance of the practice, I would say it is most probable that it was through the influence of current events more so than a deep conviction that caused it to be implemented.
 
The differences of era and religion do play a part, especially in the actors present, but I like to see the commonalities between Roman culture and modern culture (since that is what we are all about) rather than the differences. Very interesting topic indeed, excellent conversation.
 
Vale,
Regulus

From: Maior
Sent: Sunday, February 08, 2009 1:02 AM
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Bona Dea and Roman culture [Regulus & Maior Conversation]

Salve Regule;
Republican Rome wasn't a secular society like France nor was it a
theocracy. It's true senators were pontifexes and augurs but old
cults could not be changed, Romans had a deep reverence for ancient
practice. So not even the Senate would not, could not interfere with
the priestesses of Bona Dea.
In your discussion of your family cultus, I'm at a total cultural
loss and an intellectual one. I do know until fairly recently Western
culture equated sexuality with evil, forbid birth control and
abortion as well as divorce. If it was that calculated it was deeply
shrewd.
It only came around 1998 to Ireland! perhaps Livia Plauta or Albucius
or Dexter will be able to further the conversation; I've retitled it
to invite further discussion. Fascinating topic.
optime vale
Maior

> Salve Maior,
>
> Haha, well it started
out as depicting the 'huge difference between
Judaeo-Christian and Republican Roman' views on abortion (regardless
of what you are saying now, because I agree it is an interesting
tidbit of Roman culture) and the RC church represents the majority of
Judaeo-Christians (in a numerical sense) so I hardly think we can
have a decent discussion if you refuse to consider the majority of
the people you made the comment about. My point was simply that it is
not a matter of religious necessity for the Christian world either,
but of princes and bishops having the same desire as Roman
aristocracy; more hands to hold plows and swords. The fact that they
managed to get it introduced as part of religion (which is much
harder to change than rational decisions) makes it all the more
effective, but doesn't represent anything other than the exact same
motives as Roman aristocrats and different circumstances. Besides, as
I'm constantly told, the Roman State and Religion were inextricably
intertwined and so if you say the State controlled it, then I assume
the Religio would have had much influence as well.
>
> Regulus
>
>
> From:
Maior
> Sent: Saturday, February 07, 2009 6:47 PM
> To:
href="mailto:Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com">Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com
> Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Curious non-member with some
questions.
>
>
> Regule;
> frankly I don't care that
the RC church was/is against birth
> control or was for/against abortion.
That's a private cultus with no
> interest to me.
> What I'm saying
is that this is a good example of Roman culture,
> where political
conservatives might complain that Roman women were
not
> bearing
enough chiidren, What could they do? very little, Except
> Augustus who
rewarded matrons who had 3 children, you see it's the
> state who is
involved in this issue in Rome.
> optime vale
> Maior
>
> >
> > Salve Maior,
> >
> > You must be
looking at a different church than I. =) My mother's
> family is
traditional Irish Catholic. I can think of few families in
> my
grandparents' generation of less than 10 children (my grandmother
> had 15
siblings), and my mother had 6 siblings. I can't speak to
> motives, but I
can't argue with the results. It is no coincidence
that
> there are
over 1,000,000,000 Catholics. Considering the early Church
> had no laws
against abortion (in fact St. Augustine of Hippo Regius
> wrote that
abortion is not a murder since a fetus would have no
soul),
> I can
see no reason for later Church leaders to add it (in the face
of
>
previous precedent) except for the obvious benefits of increased
>
manpower. Besides, when you consider that the Church generally
frowns
> upon sexual activity, it becomes even more apparent that this
frequent
> sanctimonious shagging belief was more a matter of
convenience than
> conviction. I will also say that the Church has
historically
provided
> support for the orphans that this sort of
practice inevitably
creates,
> so hats off for supporting their
practice, but I do not think that
the
> anti-abortion (pro-life?)
movement is anything intrinsically
> Judaeo-Christian. Just to keep
pumping out missionaries, priests,
> nuns, monks and crusades one needs a
large pool of manpower.
> >
> > Vale,
> >
Regulus
> >
> >
> > From: Maior
> > Sent:
Saturday, February 07, 2009 4:54 PM
> > To:
href="mailto:Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com">Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com
> > Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Curious non-member with some
questions.
> >
> >
> > Salve Regule;
> >
you're not asking why Roman conservatives didn't like it:) They
> >
wanted more Roman boys! A very different attitude than today And
> >
that's the big point I'm tying to make about Republican culture.
> >
> > great discussion to have,
> > valeas Maior
> >
> > >
> > > Salve Maior,
> > >
> > > If conservative Romans railed against it then, and
conservatives
> > rail against it now, I don't see why you would make
it into a
> > religious matter. Perhaps it has more to do with
conservatives
than
> > religion? =)
> > >
> > > I'm sure if you asked a Roman Catholic priest he wouldn't be
too
> > smitten with the idea of abortion of course, but I don't think
anyone
> > would accuse the Catholic church of being overly
progressive.
Pretty
> > clear parallels could be drawn between the
masses that choose to
use
> > the service, and a conservative
portion of the population that
> > disagrees with it both then and now.
I know here in Canada most
people
> > are at least nominally
Christian, and yet our public health-care
> > system permits abortions
without embracing Republican values.
> > >
> > >
Vale,
> > > Titus Annaeus Regulus
> > >
> > >
> > > From: Maior
> > > Sent: Saturday, February
07, 2009 4:05 PM
> > > To:
href="mailto:Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com">Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com
> > > Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Curious non-member with some
questions.
> > >
> > >
> > > Maior Ricardo
quiritibus spd:
> > > this discussion has inspired me to want Vox
Romana to do a piece
> > > on Bona Dea and her temple in
Rome.
> > > The precincts of this ancient goddess' temple were only
open to
> > > women and Bona Dea's priestesses operated a kind of
pharmacy
where
> > > women could obtain abortificants.
> > >
> > > I shocked, really freaked out a lot of people on a
latin list
with
> > > this knowledge that a common culture
existed where abortion was
just
> > > fine and pretty easily
obtainable (though conservative Romans
would
> > > rail against
it)
> > >
> > > So here is a good example of a huge
cultural difference between
> > > Republican polytheistic Rome and
moderns with their Judae-
Christian
> > > backgrounds. Of course
as Nova Roma we follow Republican Rome!
> > > optime vale
> > > M. Hortensia Maior
> > > Flaminica Carmentalis
> > > Producer Vox Romana podcast
> > >
> > > >
> > > > SaIve Ricarde;
> > > > I'm M.
Hortensia Maior producer of Vox Romana podcast,
actually
> > > > Saturninus wrote to me not too long ago about the next
podcast,
>
but I
> > > > was super busy. If you are interested please write
to me. I
> would like
> > > > to see another one go
out.
> > > >
> > > > As for just 2 people, I live
in Chapel Hill, NC near Duke
with 2 big
> > > > classics dept
and I was the only Nova Roman here. But I met
new
> civis
> > > > M. Aelia Connonia and then this last summer Q. Caelia Laeta
who
> > > > joined. Yes we're two but now we meet and study
and try to
speak
> Latin
> > > > together, discuss NR
and we're thinking of celebrating maybe
the
> > > > Floralia
and having a big party making Roman food and putting
up a
> > > > poster at these departments. ..So you see you can recruit.
> > > >
> > > > Nova Roma is a culture its not the SCA at
all.There is no
fantasy in
> > > > what we're doing..
> > > > If you ignore politics,religio, etc you're missing out on
being
> > > > fully Roman on interacting as a 21st century
Roman. We are not
> RPG we
> > > > re the rebirth the
revival of Roman culture, Roman values in
the
> 21st
> > > > century. It's a wholistic experience.
> > > > I hoped I've
cleared things up for you. Do write, epistulum
mihi
> > >
scrivas
> > > > valeas
> > > > Maior
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > In
href="mailto:Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com">Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com, Rich <wielgosz@> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > On Sat, 2009-02-07 at 00:57 -0500, A. Tullia Scholastica
wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > I live east of Syracuse
NY. That's the biggest population
> > > > > >
center
> > > > > > nearest to me.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Scholastica: and there may be some
citizens around
> > > there,
> > > > > > too,
though NYC is a better bet. As earlier, Iâ?Tm here
> > >
too,
> > > > > > not ALL that far away.
> > > > >
> > > > > Absolutely. But two people do not exactly
make for the kind
of
> > > social
> > > > >
event I was imagining. :-)
> > > > >
> > > > > > I have communicated with a few people off list, actually.
I
> > > > > > produce a
> > > > > > podcast and thought I might like to get involved with a
> > > > > > podcast produced
> > > > > > by Nova Romans.
That collaboration hasn't happened yet.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Scholastica: Nor is it likely. The producer is
in grad
> > > > > > school, and the technical person is
busy with two little
> > > > > > preschool kids and a lot
of other things, including a
broken
> > > > > > server
for the Academia Thules, which has been our
> > >
educational
> > > > > > arm, so to speak, though it is
technically unrelated to
NR.
> > > > > > There are
other issues there as well.
> > > > >
> > > > > Well, I'm too busy with my podcast to get involved in the
>
production
> > > > > of another at this time, anyway. Although
an OFFICIAL Nova
Roma
> > > podcast
> > > > >
sounds like a great way to increase membership.
> > > > >
> > > > > Regards,
> > > > >
Rich...
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60974 From: Titus Annaeus Regulus Date: 2009-02-08
Subject: Re: Regulus & Maior Conversation was [ Re: Curious non-member with s
Salve Cato,
 
I was not offended by her comment, merely in disagreement. I have not known her long enough to be sure whether you are kidding me or serious; but if people choose to believe that something is true regardless of logic demanding that it is not.. well I can hardly fault her for that if I choose to believe in Immaculate Conception can I? lol
 
It is most definitely an older tradition. Which is probably what I should have pointed out earlier. The Christian churches (particularly in the West) were so far separated from original Christianity, and so influenced by secular powers in the Roman Empire, that inevitably the RC church absorbed huge amounts of beliefs and practices from existing Roman ones. Even the Latin title of the Pope, Pontifex Maximus, is rooted in pagan Roman religion. To say that Christianity displaced Roman culture seems erroneous to me and I prefer to see an evolution of two traditions towards one that was acceptable to the common people who were Romans. The early church was spread with words and deeds and so the church needed to make itself as attractive as possible to gain converts. Being seen as foreign and alien would hardly have helped. In fact, using your example of the subjugation of women, I recall that there were female equivalents of all religious positions (priests, deacons, etc) in the early eastern church and that it was the later, Roman-influenced church that was male-only, more in line with patriarchal Roman society. Very interesting point of view on this Cato, I have found it highly enlightening.
 
Vale,
Regulus
 
 

Sent: Sunday, February 08, 2009 10:27 AM
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Regulus & Maior Conversation was [ Re: Curious non-member with some questions.]

Cato omnes in foro SPD

Salvete.

Remember that the Romans and Greeks thought that exposing a newborn
child to the elements and allowing it to die was perfectly
acceptable, even if its only crime was to be born female; just
because an activity was in fact practiced does *not* make it
acceptable or moral. I would not, if I were Maior, go trumpeting
the fact that an activity that many find morally unacceptable was a
big selling point in the worship of the Bona Dea. I am not
surprised that some on the Latin List were ... "shocked".

Regulus, you'll have to get used to Maior. Every single ill that
could possibly befall the human race - or has ever already befallen
it - will, in her experience, find its root cause in Christianity; I
think she throws the "Judeo" bit on the front to appear more
moderate than she actually is. What she seems to forget is that,
like Satanists celebrating a "Black Mass" in mockery of the real
one, her railings only give proof to the power inherent in the thing
mocked.

Like Dan Brown, she also consistently forgets that the Roman
Catholic church is a relative newbie - the Eastern Orthodox Church
was around and running for a couple of centuries before the Roman
church stuck its toe in the authority-figure waters. True that it
was some early Fathers and a couple of bishops of Rome that gave
traction to the idea of sex being somehow unclean, but the general
subjugation of women in society is an incredibly far older practice
than that, spanning across the arc of recorded history. This
doesn't mean it's acceptable, just that it is a fact of history.

Valete,

Cato

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60975 From: nate kingery Date: 2009-02-08
Subject: Re: Curious non-member with some questions.
I live in Batavia NY, am in the SCA and also just became a member of Nova Roma, feel free to contact me off list
 
M. D. Aggripa


Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60976 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2009-02-08
Subject: Re: A reminder from the praetor
Cato Maiori omnibusque in foro SPD

Salve et salvete.

Well, this is certainly a Sign of the End Times; pack up your
traveling bag and get ready for the Rapture, because...I agree with
Maior (except for the telling him to go somewhere else part).

While some of the replies may be snarky, cutting, idiotic or just
plain mean, we are free citizens of a free Respublica. I'm sure Rich
is old enough and intelligent enough to separate the wheat from the
chaff.

Vale et valete,

Cato


--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Maior" <rory12001@...> wrote:
>
> Salve;
> he's not a 'guest' this isnt a Victorian tea party; it's the forum
of
> Nova Roma, where cives meet and exchange ideas with vigor, a very
> Roman thing to do...
> Let him go to New Romans if he's sensitive!
> M. Hortensia Maior--
>
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60977 From: philippe cardon Date: 2009-02-08
Subject: Re: Regulus & Maior Conversation was [ Re: Curious non-member with s
Just curious...
what is the link between the worship of Bona Dea and abortion?
 
and i don't understant this sentence "the Roman
Catholic church is a relative newbie - the Eastern Orthodox Church
was around and running for a couple of centuries before the Roman
church stuck its toe in the authority-figure waters"
each church is so ancient as the others... and we can't spaak of eastern and western churches as 2 separate entities before 1054
so i don't see what you mean
in fact you could say the church began to speak latin in Africa in the IInd century (with tertullianus and others)before she spoke Greek even in Italy
 
Varo
 
 
 
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Sunday, February 08, 2009 7:39 PM
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Regulus & Maior Conversation was [ Re: Curious non-member with some questions.]

Salve Cato,
 
I was not offended by her comment, merely in disagreement. I have not known her long enough to be sure whether you are kidding me or serious; but if people choose to believe that something is true regardless of logic demanding that it is not.. well I can hardly fault her for that if I choose to believe in Immaculate Conception can I? lol
 
It is most definitely an older tradition. Which is probably what I should have pointed out earlier. The Christian churches (particularly in the West) were so far separated from original Christianity, and so influenced by secular powers in the Roman Empire, that inevitably the RC church absorbed huge amounts of beliefs and practices from existing Roman ones. Even the Latin title of the Pope, Pontifex Maximus, is rooted in pagan Roman religion. To say that Christianity displaced Roman culture seems erroneous to me and I prefer to see an evolution of two traditions towards one that was acceptable to the common people who were Romans. The early church was spread with words and deeds and so the church needed to make itself as attractive as possible to gain converts. Being seen as foreign and alien would hardly have helped. In fact, using your example of the subjugation of women, I recall that there were female equivalents of all religious positions (priests, deacons, etc) in the early eastern church and that it was the later, Roman-influenced church that was male-only, more in line with patriarchal Roman society. Very interesting point of view on this Cato, I have found it highly enlightening.
 
Vale,
Regulus
 
 

Sent: Sunday, February 08, 2009 10:27 AM
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Regulus & Maior Conversation was [ Re: Curious non-member with some questions.]

Cato omnes in foro SPD

Salvete.

Remember that the Romans and Greeks thought that exposing a newborn
child to the elements and allowing it to die was perfectly
acceptable, even if its only crime was to be born female; just
because an activity was in fact practiced does *not* make it
acceptable or moral. I would not, if I were Maior, go trumpeting
the fact that an activity that many find morally unacceptable was a
big selling point in the worship of the Bona Dea. I am not
surprised that some on the Latin List were ... "shocked".

Regulus, you'll have to get used to Maior. Every single ill that
could possibly befall the human race - or has ever already befallen
it - will, in her experience, find its root cause in Christianity; I
think she throws the "Judeo" bit on the front to appear more
moderate than she actually is. What she seems to forget is that,
like Satanists celebrating a "Black Mass" in mockery of the real
one, her railings only give proof to the power inherent in the thing
mocked.

Like Dan Brown, she also consistently forgets that the Roman
Catholic church is a relative newbie - the Eastern Orthodox Church
was around and running for a couple of centuries before the Roman
church stuck its toe in the authority-figure waters. True that it
was some early Fathers and a couple of bishops of Rome that gave
traction to the idea of sex being somehow unclean, but the general
subjugation of women in society is an incredibly far older practice
than that, spanning across the arc of recorded history. This
doesn't mean it's acceptable, just that it is a fact of history.

Valete,

Cato


---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Orange vous informe que cet e-mail a été contrôlé par l'anti-virus mail.
Aucun virus connu à ce jour par nos services n'a été détecté.


Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60978 From: Rich Date: 2009-02-08
Subject: Re: A reminder from the praetor
On Sun, 2009-02-08 at 21:32 +0000, Gaius Equitius Cato wrote:

> I'm sure Rich
> is old enough and intelligent enough to separate the wheat from the
> chaff.

Let's not go overboard. :-)

Rich...
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60979 From: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com Date: 2009-02-08
Subject: File - language.txt
Nova Roma's official business language is English, and its official ceremonial language is Latin. There are other non-official languages that must be considered as common use languages, due to the international nature of the Nova Roman community. To insure timely posting, write your posts in English, French, German, Hungarian, Italian, Latin, Portuguese or Spanish.

---------------------------

El idioma de trabajo de Nova Roma es el Ingl�s, y su lenguaje ceremonial es el Lat�n. Hay otros idiomas no oficiales que deben ser considerados de uso com�n, debido a la naturaleza internacional de la comunidad nova romana. Para asegurar que la publicaci�n inmediata de los mensajes, escriba en Ingl�s, Franc�s, Alem�n, H�ngaro, Italiano, Lat�n, Portugu�s o Espa�ol.

-----------------------------

La lingua ufficiale a Nova Roma � l�Inglese e quella ceremoniale � il Latino. Ci sono altre lingue non ufficiali che devono essere considerate d�uso comune dovuto al carattere internazionale della comunit� nova romana. Per assicurarsi dell�immediata pubblicazione dei messaggi pu� scrivere in Inglese, Francese, Tedesco, Ungherese, Italiano, Latino, Portoghese o Spagnolo.

-----------------------------
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60980 From: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com Date: 2009-02-08
Subject: File - EDICTUM DE SERMONE
Ex officio praetorum:

The Nova-Roma mailing list is the principal forum for Nova Roma.
Citizens of Nova Roma and interested non-citizens alike are welcome. All users, citizen and non-citizen alike, shall abide by these rules when posting to the Nova Roma mailing list. Violations of these rules will result in corrective action, which may include banning from the list for non-citizens and restriction of posting privileges for citizens.


---

I. Language

Nova Roma's official business language is English, and its official ceremonial language is Latin. There are other non-official languages that must be considered as common use languages, due to the international nature of the Nova Roman community. To insure timely posting, write your posts in English, French, German, Hungarian, Italian, Latin, Portuguese or Spanish. If you write your posts in languages other than the above mentioned, they may be delayed for some time until the moderators can obtain a translation.



All official government documents must appear in English/Latin as well as whatever vernacular languages are relevant.



---


II. Topics of discussion

Nova Roman business, community, governmental, religious, and other state activities

The culture, religion, sociology, politics, history, archaeology, and philosophy of Roma Antiqua, ancient Greece, the ancient Near East, and other cultures with which the ancient Romans interacted.

Discussions may sometimes go into subjects beyond these topics, but such digressions should be brief and related to the listed topics. Messages of this kind must be clearly marked as �off topic�.



---

III. Civil Discourse

All on-list exchanges between users of the Nova-Roma mailing list will follow these rules of civil discourse:

Show respect for others.

Recognize a person�s right to advocate ideas that are different from your own.

Discuss policies and ideas without attacking people.

Use helpful, not hurtful language.

Write as you would like to be written to.

Restate ideas when asked.

Write in good faith.

Treat what others have to say as written in good faith.

Respectfully read and consider differing points of view.

When unsure, clarify what you think you have read.

Realize that what you wrote and what people understand you to have written may be different.

Recognize that people can agree to disagree.

Speak and write for yourself, not others.



---

IV. Forbidden

The following are forbidden:

Unsolicited commercial e-mail (UCE or spam)

References or discussions to material of a sexual nature that are not strictly within the context of a historical discussion, with citations given, unless the material is a matter of common knowledge

Links to external websites or files which contain material that might reasonably be deemed obscene or pornographic.



Insulting the religious beliefs of others, and the historical basis for those beliefs, is off limits.



This edict takes effect immediately.


Continued in effect by Edictum Praetorium 2762-02,
Prorogation of praetorian edicts issued by the praetors for 2761 auc
a.d. XV Kal. Feb. MMDCCLXII a.u.c. (19 Ian. 2009 c.c.)
M. Curiatius Complutensis M. Iulius Severus coss.

CN-EQVIT-MARINVS--PUB-MEMM-ALBUCIVS
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60981 From: Stefn Ullerius Venator Piperbarbus Date: 2009-02-08
Subject: Re: Rich's original questions, was Re: Curious non-member with some
Ave Rich;

On Sun, Feb 8, 2009 at 12:02 PM, Rich wrote:
>
>> This will change as we build the New City.
>
> The new City?
>

Just a way I've referred to Nova Roma this past almost 11 years.

We seek to build a New Rome, a City as it were, based upon that which was.

I write a lot of poetry, so many times my prose takes poetic turn.

Vale - Venator
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60982 From: Lucia Livia Plauta Date: 2009-02-08
Subject: Regulus & Maior Conversation was [ Re: Curious non-member with some
Plauta Catoni omnibusque S.P.D.


>Remember that the Romans and Greeks thought that exposing a newborn
>child to the elements and allowing it to die was perfectly
>acceptable, even if its only crime was to be born female;

Of course they thought it was acceptable. Those were times when there
was no really effective contraception, and abortion (despite the
services of Bona Dea) was a very risky business.
So the only effective method of birth control was exposing children.
The effects of uncontrolled breeding would have included the
excessive fractioning of properties, creating social upheaval.
In some cultures, like the egyptian one, the fractioning of
properties was partly prevented by encouraging marriages between
siblings, but, with a modern eye, that doesn't seem a better solution
either.

Abortion is considered acceptable by millions and millions of people
in the world, and even exposing children is considered acceptable in
some communities that don't have access to abortion or contraception.

>just
>because an activity was in fact practiced does *not* make it
>acceptable or moral.

No? Why not? If it is accepted by a big enough community, an activity
is by definition acceptable.
Morals evolve along with technology and civilization. For example we
can now afford not to find exposure of children acceptable, because
we have better alternatives, and we can even afford to consider
abortion acceptable only in emergencies, because we have
contraception.
So these things are no longer necessary evils, as they were very
likely thought of in antiquity, just like slavery was.

>Regulus, you'll have to get used to Maior. Every single ill that
>could possibly befall the human race - or has ever already befallen
>it - will, in her experience, find its root cause in Christianity; I
>think she throws the "Judeo" bit on the front to appear more
>moderate than she actually is.

Cato, you know that's not true. Maior for example never accused
Christians of having invented gunpowder, or the atom bomb, or of
having spread HIV.
She never even accused Christianity of having started the general
subjugation of women.
Her problems with Christianity are much more specific and limited
than that, and I'll try to explain them.

She, along with me and a few billion other people in the world,
thinks that some of the principles and ideas Christianity has
promoted are innatural, detrimental to the personal well-being and
happiness of people, and generally dangerous.

These ideas can be roughly divided into two spheres:
1. the attitude to sex and the human body, and
2. religious intolerance.

In order not to stray too much off-topic, let me explain these issues
in terms of differences between the roman conception and the
christian one.

1. For the Romans, as well as for the Greeks, the body was the
expression and mirror of the mind. Hence the saying "mens sana in
corpore sano". This implied a balance between body and mind in
education and in life, an equal attention to the development of both,
and a full enjoyment of the capabilities of both.
In Roman society, at least from the time of Augustus, but probably
even before, this was valid also for women, who played sports and
went to bathhouses just like men.
A beautiful body was considered a sign of favour by the Gods, and
usually associated with a beautiful mind too. Discrepancies, cases
when somebody was very ugly but intelligent, or beautiful and stupid,
were considered interesting exceptions, rather than the rule.
Sex was considered a fact of life, to be enjoyed when one could, or
joked about. Moral restrictions applied to the circumstances of sex,
not to the act itself. So it was deemed appropriate for a woman to be
faithful to her husband, and so on. Virginity was a trait of some
priestesses (the vestal virgins), but definitely not because sex was
considered an evil in itself.

For Christians (for all of them, right from the origins) the human
body was just a filthy temporary receptacle for the soul, which would
be "freed" from it in death.
From this, according to some Christians (not all: some have been
burnt alive for thinking differently) it followed that all the
natural needs of the body had to be mortified. The details varied
according to the era and geographical region, but these
mortifications included fasting, abstaining from sex, and self-
torture.
These mortifications were not imposed on all Christians, but the
underlying conception that all the natural needs of the body are evil
was constant and has remained today, creating a lot of hipocrisy,
problems and complexes along the centuries.
Really, it shouldn't be that surprising that lots of people blame
Christians for this.

On this theme, however, I understand Cato's need to distinguish the
Orthodox Church from the others, because I can testify that modern-
day Orthodox Church really has a much healthier attitude about sex. I
have no idea if it's due to doctrinal differences, or if hipocrisy
has simply settled better in the East than the West, but the fact is
that there really seem to be less inhibitions and problems there. The
fact that the lower clergy is usually married is surely a powerful
factor in keeping priests in touch with the mentality and needs of
the common people, and a guy who has spiritual needs not renounce
sex: he just has to make a choice between marriage and career, but
that's not worse than the choice women have in a lot of countries.
However (Cato can enlighten me if I'm wrong), I think it's safe to
assume that sex is still considered "dirty" or "evil" in all
christian denominations (if not, Cato, please indicate when the
Orthodox Church stopped saying that, because this aspect was there in
the beginning).

2. Religious intolerance is the aspect of Christianity that provedly
led to the deaths of thousands of people, so it can't really be all
that weird that people blame Christianity for it.

Romans never persecuted anyone for their religion. For polytheists it
was normal to accept the worship of different gods, and some more
didn't make a huge difference.
When there were "religious" persecutions, they were always for some
reason other than people's beliefs. Druids were persecuted because
they made human sacrifices.
Christians were persecuted because they were intolerant toward the
traditional religion: they went around offending people by saying
that their gods were evil demons, sometimes even trying to destroy
statues, causing brawls and unrest.

Even the hardest persecutory measures (in late roman times, when
local populations were requesting measures against Christians) never
forbade christian cult, but rather they prescribed that everybody
perform sacrifices to the traditional gods, and punished those who
refused.
In reality in most cases of "martyrdom" what would have been required
in order to escape the persecution was not even any sacrifice, but
just being prepared to swear on the "health" of the Emperor (source:
Robin Lane Fox, "Pagans and Christians", London, 1986, chapter IX - a
very unbiased book, interesting read).
In any case "martyrs" were never condemned without a regular trial.

After Christians came to power, however, they were not content to ask
people to worship their God alongside the others, but they forbade
the worship of every other god. Everybody in the Christian states was
forbidden to have a religion other than the official Christian one
(except the Jews). So if this isn't the definition of religious
intolerance I don't know what is.
Under Theodosius anyone who was caught sacrificing to gods, lares, or
any other entities, was put to death and their goods (house, land)
confiscated. The pagan priests who resisted the destruction of their
temples were often burned alive inside.
The wrath of Christians against "heretics" was exactly as sanguinary,
and it lasted for centuries.

The principle of religious intolerance was then appropriated by the
newly invented Muslim religion too, and it kept (and keeps) causing
(or at least giving pretexts to) endless wars.

Now, sorry for bringing up these matters, that always cause a wave of
denial and indignation by people who don't want to admit these
negative sides of Christianity, but, Cato, you brought this upon
yourself by your vehemency against Maior.

Even if I have spent a lot of words on these two areas, they by no
means encompass "Every single ill that could possibly befall the
human race".

Optime vale et valete,
Livia
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60983 From: Gallagher Date: 2009-02-08
Subject: Crusades question and NOT the start of a flame war
Salve Regulus who said in part
 
"but instigated them (I.e. the Crusades). "
 
I have been wondering for some time what the public view is of the nature of the Crusades.
Could you please inform me what you believe them to have been. This is not an invitation
for a flame war and before anyone yells OT , we are Romans of the 28th century and are adult
enough to talk about anything that has occurred since  one  A.U C.
 
Vale
 
Tiberius Galerius Paulinus

 


To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
From: t.annaevsregvlvs@...
Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2009 14:53:54 -0330
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Bona Dea and Roman culture [Regulus & Maior Conversation]


Salve Maior,
 
I agree it was not a theocracy. I am merely saying that power is power and that in different eras, there were different forms of power, but it was always closely controlled by the influential people of the time. If one is even passingly acquainted with Mediaeval history, the number of 'nullifications' of marriages that were awarded to influential persons is quite surprising even while 'divorce' remained immoral for the common people (as a case in point of convenience vs. conviction). Roman Catholicism is my faith, but I am aware that the Church has been a highly political body throughout its history. The discussion now is purely academic, so by no means feel that I may become offended.
 
Your point on the sanctity of the Bona Dea cult is what caused me to comment earlier that introducing the suppression of abortion as part of religion was a very shrewd maneuver in later ages. Religion has always been a very powerful moral force and can often defy reasoned argument. The main difference being (imo) that in the Republican era, there were many deities and so it would be difficult to affect the moral landscape of the entire culture. In later eras, there was only one large religious institution that dominated the entire Western World. If a Pope decided to ban or suppress a certain practice, it was so. Thus it was that powerful men of the time could approach the Church and request these measures be implemented. It is basically the exact same situation as Augustus rewarding fertile matrons, except for the different time and circumstances. But, as I have said earlier, power is power, and the pragmatism of rulers has been a common theme throughout Western history.
 
I would have to say the Church has been thoroughly influenced by secular concerns throughout its existence. Even the briefest acquaintance with Jesus and His teachings in the Bible would illustrate a complete rejection of violence towards anyone. However the Church has not only condoned war, but instigated them (I.e. the Crusades). You will find that the demands of the present often have had massive influence on the Church' position on its tenets. Thus while I cannot speak with certainty on why a Pope would ban abortion, considering the previous Church's acceptance of the practice, I would say it is most probable that it was through the influence of current events more so than a deep conviction that caused it to be implemented.
 
The differences of era and religion do play a part, especially in the actors present, but I like to see the commonalities between Roman culture and modern culture (since that is what we are all about) rather than the differences. Very interesting topic indeed, excellent conversation.
 
Vale,
Regulus

From: Maior
Sent: Sunday, February 08, 2009 1:02 AM
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Bona Dea and Roman culture [Regulus & Maior Conversation]

Salve Regule;
Republican Rome wasn't a secular society like France nor was it a
theocracy. It's true senators were pontifexes and augurs but old
cults could not be changed, Romans had a deep reverence for ancient
practice. So not even the Senate would not, could not interfere with
the priestesses of Bona Dea.
In your discussion of your family cultus, I'm at a total cultural
loss and an intellectual one. I do know until fairly recently Western
culture equated sexuality with evil, forbid birth control and
abortion as well as divorce. If it was that calculated it was deeply
shrewd.
It only came around 1998 to Ireland! perhaps Livia Plauta or Albucius
or Dexter will be able to further the conversation; I've retitled it
to invite further discussion. Fascinating topic.
optime vale
Maior

> Salve Maior,
>
> Haha, well it started out as depicting the 'huge difference between
Judaeo-Christian and Republican Roman' views on abortion (regardless
of what you are saying now, because I agree it is an interesting
tidbit of Roman culture) and the RC church represents the majority of
Judaeo-Christians (in a numerical sense) so I hardly think we can
have a decent discussion if you refuse to consider the majority of
the people you made the comment about. My point was simply that it is
not a matter of religious necessity for the Christian world either,
but of princes and bishops having the same desire as Roman
aristocracy; more hands to hold plows and swords. The fact that they
managed to get it introduced as part of religion (which is much
harder to change than rational decisions) makes it all the more
effective, but doesn't represent anything other than the exact same
motives as Roman aristocrats and different circumstances. Besides, as
I'm constantly told, the Roman State and Religion were inextricably
intertwined and so if you say the State controlled it, then I assume
the Religio would have had much influence as well.
>
> Regulus
>
>
> From: Maior
> Sent: Saturday, February 07, 2009 6:47 PM
> To: Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com
> Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Curious non-member with some questions.
>
>
> Regule;
> frankly I don't care that the RC church was/is against birth
> control or was for/against abortion. That's a private cultus with no
> interest to me.
> What I'm saying is that this is a good example of Roman culture,
> where political conservatives might complain that Roman women were
not
> bearing enough chiidren, What could they do? very little, Except
> Augustus who rewarded matrons who had 3 children, you see it's the
> state who is involved in this issue in Rome.
> optime vale
> Maior
>
> >
> > Salve Maior,
> >
> > You must be looking at a different church than I. =) My mother's
> family is traditional Irish Catholic. I can think of few families in
> my grandparents' generation of less than 10 children (my grandmother
> had 15 siblings), and my mother had 6 siblings. I can't speak to
> motives, but I can't argue with the results. It is no coincidence
that
> there are over 1,000,000,000 Catholics. Considering the early Church
> had no laws against abortion (in fact St. Augustine of Hippo Regius
> wrote that abortion is not a murder since a fetus would have no
soul),
> I can see no reason for later Church leaders to add it (in the face
of
> previous precedent) except for the obvious benefits of increased
> manpower. Besides, when you consider that the Church generally
frowns
> upon sexual activity, it becomes even more apparent that this
frequent
> sanctimonious shagging belief was more a matter of convenience than
> conviction. I will also say that the Church has historically
provided
> support for the orphans that this sort of practice inevitably
creates,
> so hats off for supporting their practice, but I do not think that
the
> anti-abortion (pro-life?) movement is anything intrinsically
> Judaeo-Christian. Just to keep pumping out missionaries, priests,
> nuns, monks and crusades one needs a large pool of manpower.
> >
> > Vale,
> > Regulus
> >
> >
> > From: Maior
> > Sent: Saturday, February 07, 2009 4:54 PM
> > To: Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com
> > Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Curious non-member with some questions.
> >
> >
> > Salve Regule;
> > you're not asking why Roman conservatives didn't like it:) They
> > wanted more Roman boys! A very different attitude than today And
> > that's the big point I'm tying to make about Republican culture.
> >
> > great discussion to have,
> > valeas Maior
> >
> > >
> > > Salve Maior,
> > >
> > > If conservative Romans railed against it then, and conservatives
> > rail against it now, I don't see why you would make it into a
> > religious matter. Perhaps it has more to do with conservatives
than
> > religion? =)
> > >
> > > I'm sure if you asked a Roman Catholic priest he wouldn't be too
> > smitten with the idea of abortion of course, but I don't think
anyone
> > would accuse the Catholic church of being overly progressive.
Pretty
> > clear parallels could be drawn between the masses that choose to
use
> > the service, and a conservative portion of the population that
> > disagrees with it both then and now. I know here in Canada most
people
> > are at least nominally Christian, and yet our public health-care
> > system permits abortions without embracing Republican values.
> > >
> > > Vale,
> > > Titus Annaeus Regulus
> > >
> > >
> > > From: Maior
> > > Sent: Saturday, February 07, 2009 4:05 PM
> > > To: Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com
> > > Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Curious non-member with some questions.
> > >
> > >
> > > Maior Ricardo quiritibus spd:
> > > this discussion has inspired me to want Vox Romana to do a piece
> > > on Bona Dea and her temple in Rome.
> > > The precincts of this ancient goddess' temple were only open to
> > > women and Bona Dea's priestesses operated a kind of pharmacy
where
> > > women could obtain abortificants.
> > >
> > > I shocked, really freaked out a lot of people on a latin list
with
> > > this knowledge that a common culture existed where abortion was
just
> > > fine and pretty easily obtainable (though conservative Romans
would
> > > rail against it)
> > >
> > > So here is a good example of a huge cultural difference between
> > > Republican polytheistic Rome and moderns with their Judae-
Christian
> > > backgrounds. Of course as Nova Roma we follow Republican Rome!
> > > optime vale
> > > M. Hortensia Maior
> > > Flaminica Carmentalis
> > > Producer Vox Romana podcast
> > >
> > > >
> > > > SaIve Ricarde;
> > > > I'm M. Hortensia Maior producer of Vox Romana podcast,
actually
> > > > Saturninus wrote to me not too long ago about the next
podcast,
> but I
> > > > was super busy. If you are interested please write to me. I
> would like
> > > > to see another one go out.
> > > >
> > > > As for just 2 people, I live in Chapel Hill, NC near Duke
with 2 big
> > > > classics dept and I was the only Nova Roman here. But I met
new
> civis
> > > > M. Aelia Connonia and then this last summer Q. Caelia Laeta
who
> > > > joined. Yes we're two but now we meet and study and try to
speak
> Latin
> > > > together, discuss NR and we're thinking of celebrating maybe
the
> > > > Floralia and having a big party making Roman food and putting
up a
> > > > poster at these departments. ..So you see you can recruit.
> > > >
> > > > Nova Roma is a culture its not the SCA at all.There is no
fantasy in
> > > > what we're doing..
> > > > If you ignore politics,religio, etc you're missing out on
being
> > > > fully Roman on interacting as a 21st century Roman. We are not
> RPG we
> > > > re the rebirth the revival of Roman culture, Roman values in
the
> 21st
> > > > century. It's a wholistic experience.
> > > > I hoped I've cleared things up for you. Do write, epistulum
mihi
> > > scrivas
> > > > valeas
> > > > Maior
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > In Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com, Rich <wielgosz@> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > On Sat, 2009-02-07 at 00:57 -0500, A. Tullia Scholastica
wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > I live east of Syracuse NY. That's the biggest population
> > > > > > center
> > > > > > nearest to me.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Scholastica: and there may be some citizens around
> > > there,
> > > > > > too, though NYC is a better bet. As earlier, Iâ?Tm here
> > > too,
> > > > > > not ALL that far away.
> > > > >
> > > > > Absolutely. But two people do not exactly make for the kind
of
> > > social
> > > > > event I was imagining. :-)
> > > > >
> > > > > > I have communicated with a few people off list, actually.
I
> > > > > > produce a
> > > > > > podcast and thought I might like to get involved with a
> > > > > > podcast produced
> > > > > > by Nova Romans. That collaboration hasn't happened yet.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Scholastica: Nor is it likely. The producer is in grad
> > > > > > school, and the technical person is busy with two little
> > > > > > preschool kids and a lot of other things, including a
broken
> > > > > > server for the Academia Thules, which has been our
> > > educational
> > > > > > arm, so to speak, though it is technically unrelated to
NR.
> > > > > > There are other issues there as well.
> > > > >
> > > > > Well, I'm too busy with my podcast to get involved in the
> production
> > > > > of another at this time, anyway. Although an OFFICIAL Nova
Roma
> > > podcast
> > > > > sounds like a great way to increase membership.
> > > > >
> > > > > Regards,
> > > > > Rich...
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>



Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60984 From: Lucia Livia Plauta Date: 2009-02-08
Subject: Regulus & Maior Conversation was [ Re: Curious non-member with some
Salve Regule,
just some quick comments.

>
> To say that Christianity displaced Roman culture seems erroneous to
me and I prefer to see an evolution of two traditions towards one
that was acceptable to the common people who were Romans. The early
church was spread with words and deeds and so the church needed to
make itself as attractive as possible to gain converts.

LLP: You forget that Christianity never spread to a relevant
percentage of the population before it was imposed by law. It was by
no means acceptable to Romans in general.
There was no such thing as an evolution of two traditions towards
one. There was a religion that was spread with violence and edicts,
but later realized that even these means would never be enough, so
tried to assimilate as many aspects of the previous tradition as it
could.

Being seen as foreign and alien would hardly have helped.

LLP: No, it didn't help. Making it a compulsory State religion did.

In fact, using your example of the subjugation of women, I recall
that there were female equivalents of all religious positions
(priests, deacons, etc) in the early eastern church and that it was
the later, Roman-influenced church that was male-only, more in line
with patriarchal Roman society. Very interesting point of view on
this Cato, I have found it highly enlightening.

LLP: This was, in fact one point of attraction of Christianity for
women, so was the possibility of not having to marry and have
children.

Optime vale,
Livia
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60985 From: Annia Minucia Marcella Date: 2009-02-08
Subject: Re: Crusades question and NOT the start of a flame war
Well basically two years had passed since the founding of Durotar, the Horde and Alliance start fighting each other more than ever despite an armistice, specifically in Warsong Gulch, Arathi Basin, Alterac Valley, etc(the Alliance have an unfair advantage in WSG, imo). So in Blackrock Spire, Nefarian decides to breed a bunch of dragon hybrids, with the help of his sister Onyxia. Meanwhile some Priests decide to summon Hakkar the Soulflayer, a blood god, in the ruins of Zul'Gurub. Also some green dragons run amok, and some huge bug infestation threatened world wide assault.  You've got ghosts in Kharazan, and saboteurs in the Caverns of Time. Not to mention Lord Kazzak decided to open the Dark Portal to Outland. The Orcs loved this cause it brought them back to their ancestral lands. And the Draenei and Blood Elves have decided to join the Alliance and Horde(respectively) in order to fight Illidan.

oh wait, were we talking about the Burning Crusade?
Vale
- Annia Minucia Marcella

http://minucia.ciarin.com


Gallagher wrote:

Salve Regulus who said in part
 
"but instigated them (I.e. the Crusades). "
 
I have been wondering for some time what the public view is of the nature of the Crusades.
Could you please inform me what you believe them to have been. This is not an invitation
for a flame war and before anyone yells OT , we are Romans of the 28th century and are adult
enough to talk about anything that has occurred since  one  A.U C.
 
Vale
 
Tiberius Galerius Paulinus

 



To: Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com
From: t.annaevsregvlvs@ ymail.com
Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2009 14:53:54 -0330
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Bona Dea and Roman culture [Regulus & Maior Conversation]


Salve Maior,
 
I agree it was not a theocracy. I am merely saying that power is power and that in different eras, there were different forms of power, but it was always closely controlled by the influential people of the time. If one is even passingly acquainted with Mediaeval history, the number of 'nullifications' of marriages that were awarded to influential persons is quite surprising even while 'divorce' remained immoral for the common people (as a case in point of convenience vs. conviction). Roman Catholicism is my faith, but I am aware that the Church has been a highly political body throughout its history. The discussion now is purely academic, so by no means feel that I may become offended.
 
Your point on the sanctity of the Bona Dea cult is what caused me to comment earlier that introducing the suppression of abortion as part of religion was a very shrewd maneuver in later ages. Religion has always been a very powerful moral force and can often defy reasoned argument. The main difference being (imo) that in the Republican era, there were many deities and so it would be difficult to affect the moral landscape of the entire culture. In later eras, there was only one large religious institution that dominated the entire Western World. If a Pope decided to ban or suppress a certain practice, it was so. Thus it was that powerful men of the time could approach the Church and request these measures be implemented. It is basically the exact same situation as Augustus rewarding fertile matrons, except for the different time and circumstances. But, as I have said earlier, power is power, and the pragmatism of rulers has been a common theme throughout Western history.
 
I would have to say the Church has been thoroughly influenced by secular concerns throughout its existence. Even the briefest acquaintance with Jesus and His teachings in the Bible would illustrate a complete rejection of violence towards anyone. However the Church has not only condoned war, but instigated them (I.e. the Crusades). You will find that the demands of the present often have had massive influence on the Church' position on its tenets. Thus while I cannot speak with certainty on why a Pope would ban abortion, considering the previous Church's acceptance of the practice, I would say it is most probable that it was through the influence of current events more so than a deep conviction that caused it to be implemented.
 
The differences of era and religion do play a part, especially in the actors present, but I like to see the commonalities between Roman culture and modern culture (since that is what we are all about) rather than the differences. Very interesting topic indeed, excellent conversation.
 
Vale,
Regulus

From: Maior
Sent: Sunday, February 08, 2009 1:02 AM
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Bona Dea and Roman culture [Regulus & Maior Conversation]

Salve Regule;
Republican Rome wasn't a secular society like France nor was it a
theocracy. It's true senators were pontifexes and augurs but old
cults could not be changed, Romans had a deep reverence for ancient
practice. So not even the Senate would not, could not interfere with
the priestesses of Bona Dea.
In your discussion of your family cultus, I'm at a total cultural
loss and an intellectual one. I do know until fairly recently Western
culture equated sexuality with evil, forbid birth control and
abortion as well as divorce. If it was that calculated it was deeply
shrewd.
It only came around 1998 to Ireland! perhaps Livia Plauta or Albucius
or Dexter will be able to further the conversation; I've retitled it
to invite further discussion. Fascinating topic.
optime vale
Maior

> Salve Maior,
>
> Haha, well it started out as depicting the 'huge difference between
Judaeo-Christian and Republican Roman' views on abortion (regardless
of what you are saying now, because I agree it is an interesting
tidbit of Roman culture) and the RC church represents the majority of
Judaeo-Christians (in a numerical sense) so I hardly think we can
have a decent discussion if you refuse to consider the majority of
the people you made the comment about. My point was simply that it is
not a matter of religious necessity for the Christian world either,
but of princes and bishops having the same desire as Roman
aristocracy; more hands to hold plows and swords. The fact that they
managed to get it introduced as part of religion (which is much
harder to change than rational decisions) makes it all the more
effective, but doesn't represent anything other than the exact same
motives as Roman aristocrats and different circumstances. Besides, as
I'm constantly told, the Roman State and Religion were inextricably
intertwined and so if you say the State controlled it, then I assume
the Religio would have had much influence as well.
>
> Regulus
>
>
> From: Maior
> Sent: Saturday, February 07, 2009 6:47 PM
> To: Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com
> Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Curious non-member with some questions.
>
>
> Regule;
> frankly I don't care that the RC church was/is against birth
> control or was for/against abortion. That's a private cultus with no
> interest to me.
> What I'm saying is that this is a good example of Roman culture,
> where political conservatives might complain that Roman women were
not
> bearing enough chiidren, What could they do? very little, Except
> Augustus who rewarded matrons who had 3 children, you see it's the
> state who is involved in this issue in Rome.
> optime vale
> Maior
>
> >
> > Salve Maior,
> >
> > You must be looking at a different church than I. =) My mother's
> family is traditional Irish Catholic. I can think of few families in
> my grandparents' generation of less than 10 children (my grandmother
> had 15 siblings), and my mother had 6 siblings. I can't speak to
> motives, but I can't argue with the results. It is no coincidence
that
> there are over 1,000,000,000 Catholics. Considering the early Church
> had no laws against abortion (in fact St. Augustine of Hippo Regius
> wrote that abortion is not a murder since a fetus would have no
soul),
> I can see no reason for later Church leaders to add it (in the face
of
> previous precedent) except for the obvious benefits of increased
> manpower. Besides, when you consider that the Church generally
frowns
> upon sexual activity, it becomes even more apparent that this
frequent
> sanctimonious shagging belief was more a matter of convenience than
> conviction. I will also say that the Church has historically
provided
> support for the orphans that this sort of practice inevitably
creates,
> so hats off for supporting their practice, but I do not think that
the
> anti-abortion (pro-life?) movement is anything intrinsically
> Judaeo-Christian. Just to keep pumping out missionaries, priests,
> nuns, monks and crusades one needs a large pool of manpower.
> >
> > Vale,
> > Regulus
> >
> >
> > From: Maior
> > Sent: Saturday, February 07, 2009 4:54 PM
> > To: Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com
> > Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Curious non-member with some questions.
> >
> >
> > Salve Regule;
> > you're not asking why Roman conservatives didn't like it:) They
> > wanted more Roman boys! A very different attitude than today And
> > that's the big point I'm tying to make about Republican culture.
> >
> > great discussion to have,
> > valeas Maior
> >
> > >
> > > Salve Maior,
> > >
> > > If conservative Romans railed against it then, and conservatives
> > rail against it now, I don't see why you would make it into a
> > religious matter. Perhaps it has more to do with conservatives
than
> > religion? =)
> > >
> > > I'm sure if you asked a Roman Catholic priest he wouldn't be too
> > smitten with the idea of abortion of course, but I don't think
anyone
> > would accuse the Catholic church of being overly progressive.
Pretty
> > clear parallels could be drawn between the masses that choose to
use
> > the service, and a conservative portion of the population that
> > disagrees with it both then and now. I know here in Canada most
people
> > are at least nominally Christian, and yet our public health-care
> > system permits abortions without embracing Republican values.
> > >
> > > Vale,
> > > Titus Annaeus Regulus
> > >
> > >
> > > From: Maior
> > > Sent: Saturday, February 07, 2009 4:05 PM
> > > To: Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com
> > > Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Curious non-member with some questions.
> > >
> > >
> > > Maior Ricardo quiritibus spd:
> > > this discussion has inspired me to want Vox Romana to do a piece
> > > on Bona Dea and her temple in Rome.
> > > The precincts of this ancient goddess' temple were only open to
> > > women and Bona Dea's priestesses operated a kind of pharmacy
where
> > > women could obtain abortificants.
> > >
> > > I shocked, really freaked out a lot of people on a latin list
with
> > > this knowledge that a common culture existed where abortion was
just
> > > fine and pretty easily obtainable (though conservative Romans
would
> > > rail against it)
> > >
> > > So here is a good example of a huge cultural difference between
> > > Republican polytheistic Rome and moderns with their Judae-
Christian
> > > backgrounds. Of course as Nova Roma we follow Republican Rome!
> > > optime vale
> > > M. Hortensia Maior
> > > Flaminica Carmentalis
> > > Producer Vox Romana podcast
> > >
> > > >
> > > > SaIve Ricarde;
> > > > I'm M. Hortensia Maior producer of Vox Romana podcast,
actually
> > > > Saturninus wrote to me not too long ago about the next
podcast,
> but I
> > > > was super busy. If you are interested please write to me. I
> would like
> > > > to see another one go out.
> > > >
> > > > As for just 2 people, I live in Chapel Hill, NC near Duke
with 2 big
> > > > classics dept and I was the only Nova Roman here. But I met
new
> civis
> > > > M. Aelia Connonia and then this last summer Q. Caelia Laeta
who
> > > > joined. Yes we're two but now we meet and study and try to
speak
> Latin
> > > > together, discuss NR and we're thinking of celebrating maybe
the
> > > > Floralia and having a big party making Roman food and putting
up a
> > > > poster at these departments. ..So you see you can recruit.
> > > >
> > > > Nova Roma is a culture its not the SCA at all.There is no
fantasy in
> > > > what we're doing..
> > > > If you ignore politics,religio, etc you're missing out on
being
> > > > fully Roman on interacting as a 21st century Roman. We are not
> RPG we
> > > > re the rebirth the revival of Roman culture, Roman values in
the
> 21st
> > > > century. It's a wholistic experience.
> > > > I hoped I've cleared things up for you. Do write, epistulum
mihi
> > > scrivas
> > > > valeas
> > > > Maior
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > In Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com, Rich <wielgosz@> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > On Sat, 2009-02-07 at 00:57 -0500, A. Tullia Scholastica
wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > I live east of Syracuse NY. That's the biggest population
> > > > > > center
> > > > > > nearest to me.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Scholastica: and there may be some citizens around
> > > there,
> > > > > > too, though NYC is a better bet. As earlier, Iâ?Tm here
> > > too,
> > > > > > not ALL that far away.
> > > > >
> > > > > Absolutely. But two people do not exactly make for the kind
of
> > > social
> > > > > event I was imagining. :-)
> > > > >
> > > > > > I have communicated with a few people off list, actually.
I
> > > > > > produce a
> > > > > > podcast and thought I might like to get involved with a
> > > > > > podcast produced
> > > > > > by Nova Romans. That collaboration hasn't happened yet.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Scholastica: Nor is it likely. The producer is in grad
> > > > > > school, and the technical person is busy with two little
> > > > > > preschool kids and a lot of other things, including a
broken
> > > > > > server for the Academia Thules, which has been our
> > > educational
> > > > > > arm, so to speak, though it is technically unrelated to
NR.
> > > > > > There are other issues there as well.
> > > > >
> > > > > Well, I'm too busy with my podcast to get involved in the
> production
> > > > > of another at this time, anyway. Although an OFFICIAL Nova
Roma
> > > podcast
> > > > > sounds like a great way to increase membership.
> > > > >
> > > > > Regards,
> > > > > Rich...
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>



Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60986 From: Ellen Catalina Date: 2009-02-08
Subject: Re: Regulus & Maior Conversation was [ Re: Curious non-member with s
True- I am reading Barbara Ehrenreich's book about collective joy. She claims that the very early Christians in Rome appealed to women and the poor. Contrary to the perception of the modern "family values Christians" early Christianity was not really a family-focused religion, but more like a hippy experience (my own inference). The early Christians heeded Christ's advice to live as the birds of the air, not putting down roots or neccesarily having families. She writes:

" (Jesus) had preached that the existing social order was soon to give way to the kingdom of heaven, hence the irrelevence of the old social ties of family and tribe. Since the final days were imminent, it was no longer neccesary to have children or even cleave to one's (unbeleiving) spouse or kin"

-Ellen

--- On Sun, 2/8/09, Lucia Livia Plauta <livia.plauta@...> wrote:
From: Lucia Livia Plauta <livia.plauta@...>
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Regulus & Maior Conversation was [ Re: Curious non-member with some questions.]
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Date: Sunday, February 8, 2009, 6:05 PM

Salve Regule,
just some quick comments.

>
> To say that Christianity displaced Roman culture seems erroneous to
me and I prefer to see an evolution of two traditions towards one
that was acceptable to the common people who were Romans. The early
church was spread with words and deeds and so the church needed to
make itself as attractive as possible to gain converts.

LLP: You forget that Christianity never spread to a relevant
percentage of the population before it was imposed by law. It was by
no means acceptable to Romans in general.
There was no such thing as an evolution of two traditions towards
one. There was a religion that was spread with violence and edicts,
but later realized that even these means would never be enough, so
tried to assimilate as many aspects of the previous tradition as it
could.

Being seen as foreign and alien would hardly have helped.

LLP: No, it didn't help. Making it a compulsory State religion did.

In fact, using your example of the subjugation of women, I recall
that there were female equivalents of all religious positions
(priests, deacons, etc) in the early eastern church and that it was
the later, Roman-influenced church that was male-only, more in line
with patriarchal Roman society. Very interesting point of view on
this Cato, I have found it highly enlightening.

LLP: This was, in fact one point of attraction of Christianity for
women, so was the possibility of not having to marry and have
children.

Optime vale,
Livia


Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60987 From: Maior Date: 2009-02-08
Subject: Regulus & Maior Conversation was [ Re: Curious non-member with some
Maior Varroni spd:
my apologies Varro, years ago I'd read that the temple of Bona Dea
on the Aventine was Rome's officila abortion clinic. But I cannot
find the quotation anywhere.
Instead I can tell you that Bona Dea was a goddess of healing and
fertility. Her temple precincts had snakes everywhere and the
priestesses kept a herbarium and dispensed herbal preparations...

Macrobius l.c : quidam Medam putant, quod in aede eius omne genus
herbarum sit ex quibus antistites dant plerumque medicinas

translation (dieux je fais un traduction de Latine, j'espere ce soit
juste. :
they seem like a sort of Medea, becaue in her temple is every type
of herb from which the priestesses give many medicines.

about the other, the differences among Christian culti, I don't
understand a word either:)
optime vale
Maior


> Just curious...
> what is the link between the worship of Bona Dea and abortion?
>
> and i don't understant this sentence "the Roman
> Catholic church is a relative newbie - the Eastern Orthodox Church
> was around and running for a couple of centuries before the Roman
> church stuck its toe in the authority-figure waters"
> each church is so ancient as the others... and we can't spaak of
eastern and western churches as 2 separate entities before 1054
> so i don't see what you mean
> in fact you could say the church began to speak latin in Africa in
the IInd century (with tertullianus and others)before she spoke Greek
even in Italy
>
> Varo
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Titus Annaeus Regulus
> To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Sunday, February 08, 2009 7:39 PM
> Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Regulus & Maior Conversation was [ Re:
Curious non-member with some questions.]
>
>
>
> Salve Cato,
>
> I was not offended by her comment, merely in disagreement. I have
not known her long enough to be sure whether you are kidding me or
serious; but if people choose to believe that something is true
regardless of logic demanding that it is not.. well I can hardly
fault her for that if I choose to believe in Immaculate Conception
can I? lol
>
> It is most definitely an older tradition. Which is probably what
I should have pointed out earlier. The Christian churches
(particularly in the West) were so far separated from original
Christianity, and so influenced by secular powers in the Roman
Empire, that inevitably the RC church absorbed huge amounts of
beliefs and practices from existing Roman ones. Even the Latin title
of the Pope, Pontifex Maximus, is rooted in pagan Roman religion. To
say that Christianity displaced Roman culture seems erroneous to me
and I prefer to see an evolution of two traditions towards one that
was acceptable to the common people who were Romans. The early church
was spread with words and deeds and so the church needed to make
itself as attractive as possible to gain converts. Being seen as
foreign and alien would hardly have helped. In fact, using your
example of the subjugation of women, I recall that there were female
equivalents of all religious positions (priests, deacons, etc) in the
early eastern church and that it was the later, Roman-influenced
church that was male-only, more in line with patriarchal Roman
society. Very interesting point of view on this Cato, I have found it
highly enlightening.
>
> Vale,
> Regulus
>
>
>
>
> From: Gaius Equitius Cato
> Sent: Sunday, February 08, 2009 10:27 AM
> To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [Nova-Roma] Regulus & Maior Conversation was [ Re:
Curious non-member with some questions.]
>
>
> Cato omnes in foro SPD
>
> Salvete.
>
> Remember that the Romans and Greeks thought that exposing a
newborn
> child to the elements and allowing it to die was perfectly
> acceptable, even if its only crime was to be born female; just
> because an activity was in fact practiced does *not* make it
> acceptable or moral. I would not, if I were Maior, go trumpeting
> the fact that an activity that many find morally unacceptable was
a
> big selling point in the worship of the Bona Dea. I am not
> surprised that some on the Latin List were ... "shocked".
>
> Regulus, you'll have to get used to Maior. Every single ill that
> could possibly befall the human race - or has ever already
befallen
> it - will, in her experience, find its root cause in
Christianity; I
> think she throws the "Judeo" bit on the front to appear more
> moderate than she actually is. What she seems to forget is that,
> like Satanists celebrating a "Black Mass" in mockery of the real
> one, her railings only give proof to the power inherent in the
thing
> mocked.
>
> Like Dan Brown, she also consistently forgets that the Roman
> Catholic church is a relative newbie - the Eastern Orthodox
Church
> was around and running for a couple of centuries before the Roman
> church stuck its toe in the authority-figure waters. True that it
> was some early Fathers and a couple of bishops of Rome that gave
> traction to the idea of sex being somehow unclean, but the
general
> subjugation of women in society is an incredibly far older
practice
> than that, spanning across the arc of recorded history. This
> doesn't mean it's acceptable, just that it is a fact of history.
>
> Valete,
>
> Cato
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Orange vous informe que cet e-mail a été contrôlé par l'anti-
virus mail.
> Aucun virus connu à ce jour par nos services n'a été détecté.
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60988 From: ellencatalina Date: 2009-02-08
Subject: Another curious non-member with questions
Salve

I applied for citizenship (or probationary citizenship) via the Nova
Roma site online but I never heard anything back. Is there supposed to
be a confirmation? Am I allowed to use my requested Roman name? Should
I use my Christian name until I get approval for my Roman name? The
gens name I requested is not typical, but it is used by other Nova
Roma members and I provided an explanation as to why I hoped to be
granted that name.

Thanks- Ellen Catalina

aka S. Agoria Cornuta (?)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60989 From: Ellen Catalina Date: 2009-02-08
Subject: Re: Regulus & Maior Conversation was [ Re: Curious non-member with s
Salve

Livia said :

"For Christians (for all of them, right from the origins) the human
body was just a filthy temporary receptacle for the soul, which would
be "freed" from it in death."

Livia- one could make the same case for the way the Christians' regard the earth itself (it is merely a way station on the way to eternal salvation in heaven) and the resulting lack of stewardship over nature resulting in devestation of the land.

Would the Roman pagans have taken better care of forests, water, and so forth? It certainly seems that many pagan cults (especially the more animist ones) would have taken greater care with the environment. -Ellen

--- On Sun, 2/8/09, Lucia Livia Plauta <livia.plauta@...> wrote:
From: Lucia Livia Plauta <livia.plauta@...>
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Regulus & Maior Conversation was [ Re: Curious non-member with some questions.]
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Date: Sunday, February 8, 2009, 5:54 PM

Plauta Catoni omnibusque S.P.D.

>Remember that the Romans and Greeks thought that exposing a newborn
>child to the elements and allowing it to die was perfectly
>acceptable, even if its only crime was to be born female;

Of course they thought it was acceptable. Those were times when there
was no really effective contraception, and abortion (despite the
services of Bona Dea) was a very risky business.
So the only effective method of birth control was exposing children.
The effects of uncontrolled breeding would have included the
excessive fractioning of properties, creating social upheaval.
In some cultures, like the egyptian one, the fractioning of
properties was partly prevented by encouraging marriages between
siblings, but, with a modern eye, that doesn't seem a better solution
either.

Abortion is considered acceptable by millions and millions of people
in the world, and even exposing children is considered acceptable in
some communities that don't have access to abortion or contraception.

>just
>because an activity was in fact practiced does *not* make it
>acceptable or moral.

No? Why not? If it is accepted by a big enough community, an activity
is by definition acceptable.
Morals evolve along with technology and civilization. For example we
can now afford not to find exposure of children acceptable, because
we have better alternatives, and we can even afford to consider
abortion acceptable only in emergencies, because we have
contraception.
So these things are no longer necessary evils, as they were very
likely thought of in antiquity, just like slavery was.

>Regulus, you'll have to get used to Maior. Every single ill that
>could possibly befall the human race - or has ever already befallen
>it - will, in her experience, find its root cause in Christianity; I
>think she throws the "Judeo" bit on the front to appear more
>moderate than she actually is.

Cato, you know that's not true. Maior for example never accused
Christians of having invented gunpowder, or the atom bomb, or of
having spread HIV.
She never even accused Christianity of having started the general
subjugation of women.
Her problems with Christianity are much more specific and limited
than that, and I'll try to explain them.

She, along with me and a few billion other people in the world,
thinks that some of the principles and ideas Christianity has
promoted are innatural, detrimental to the personal well-being and
happiness of people, and generally dangerous.

These ideas can be roughly divided into two spheres:
1. the attitude to sex and the human body, and
2. religious intolerance.

In order not to stray too much off-topic, let me explain these issues
in terms of differences between the roman conception and the
christian one.

1. For the Romans, as well as for the Greeks, the body was the
expression and mirror of the mind. Hence the saying "mens sana in
corpore sano". This implied a balance between body and mind in
education and in life, an equal attention to the development of both,
and a full enjoyment of the capabilities of both.
In Roman society, at least from the time of Augustus, but probably
even before, this was valid also for women, who played sports and
went to bathhouses just like men.
A beautiful body was considered a sign of favour by the Gods, and
usually associated with a beautiful mind too. Discrepancies, cases
when somebody was very ugly but intelligent, or beautiful and stupid,
were considered interesting exceptions, rather than the rule.
Sex was considered a fact of life, to be enjoyed when one could, or
joked about. Moral restrictions applied to the circumstances of sex,
not to the act itself. So it was deemed appropriate for a woman to be
faithful to her husband, and so on. Virginity was a trait of some
priestesses (the vestal virgins), but definitely not because sex was
considered an evil in itself.

For Christians (for all of them, right from the origins) the human
body was just a filthy temporary receptacle for the soul, which would
be "freed" from it in death.
From this, according to some Christians (not all: some have been
burnt alive for thinking differently) it followed that all the
natural needs of the body had to be mortified. The details varied
according to the era and geographical region, but these
mortifications included fasting, abstaining from sex, and self-
torture.
These mortifications were not imposed on all Christians, but the
underlying conception that all the natural needs of the body are evil
was constant and has remained today, creating a lot of hipocrisy,
problems and complexes along the centuries.
Really, it shouldn't be that surprising that lots of people blame
Christians for this.

On this theme, however, I understand Cato's need to distinguish the
Orthodox Church from the others, because I can testify that modern-
day Orthodox Church really has a much healthier attitude about sex. I
have no idea if it's due to doctrinal differences, or if hipocrisy
has simply settled better in the East than the West, but the fact is
that there really seem to be less inhibitions and problems there. The
fact that the lower clergy is usually married is surely a powerful
factor in keeping priests in touch with the mentality and needs of
the common people, and a guy who has spiritual needs not renounce
sex: he just has to make a choice between marriage and career, but
that's not worse than the choice women have in a lot of countries.
However (Cato can enlighten me if I'm wrong), I think it's safe to
assume that sex is still considered "dirty" or "evil" in all
christian denominations (if not, Cato, please indicate when the
Orthodox Church stopped saying that, because this aspect was there in
the beginning).

2. Religious intolerance is the aspect of Christianity that provedly
led to the deaths of thousands of people, so it can't really be all
that weird that people blame Christianity for it.

Romans never persecuted anyone for their religion. For polytheists it
was normal to accept the worship of different gods, and some more
didn't make a huge difference.
When there were "religious" persecutions, they were always for some
reason other than people's beliefs. Druids were persecuted because
they made human sacrifices.
Christians were persecuted because they were intolerant toward the
traditional religion: they went around offending people by saying
that their gods were evil demons, sometimes even trying to destroy
statues, causing brawls and unrest.

Even the hardest persecutory measures (in late roman times, when
local populations were requesting measures against Christians) never
forbade christian cult, but rather they prescribed that everybody
perform sacrifices to the traditional gods, and punished those who
refused.
In reality in most cases of "martyrdom" what would have been required
in order to escape the persecution was not even any sacrifice, but
just being prepared to swear on the "health" of the Emperor (source:
Robin Lane Fox, "Pagans and Christians", London, 1986, chapter IX - a
very unbiased book, interesting read).
In any case "martyrs" were never condemned without a regular trial.

After Christians came to power, however, they were not content to ask
people to worship their God alongside the others, but they forbade
the worship of every other god. Everybody in the Christian states was
forbidden to have a religion other than the official Christian one
(except the Jews). So if this isn't the definition of religious
intolerance I don't know what is.
Under Theodosius anyone who was caught sacrificing to gods, lares, or
any other entities, was put to death and their goods (house, land)
confiscated. The pagan priests who resisted the destruction of their
temples were often burned alive inside.
The wrath of Christians against "heretics" was exactly as sanguinary,
and it lasted for centuries.

The principle of religious intolerance was then appropriated by the
newly invented Muslim religion too, and it kept (and keeps) causing
(or at least giving pretexts to) endless wars.

Now, sorry for bringing up these matters, that always cause a wave of
denial and indignation by people who don't want to admit these
negative sides of Christianity, but, Cato, you brought this upon
yourself by your vehemency against Maior.

Even if I have spent a lot of words on these two areas, they by no
means encompass "Every single ill that could possibly befall the
human race".

Optime vale et valete,
Livia


Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60990 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2009-02-09
Subject: Re: Another curious non-member with questions
Re: [Nova-Roma] Another curious non-member with questions

 A. Tullia Scholastica S. Agoriae Cornutae quiritibus, sociis, peregrinisque bonae voluntatis S.P.D.

Salve

I applied for citizenship (or probationary citizenship) via the Nova
Roma site online but I never heard anything back. Is there supposed to
be a confirmation?

    ATS:  Usually one should receive something, but the censores box is largely infested with spam.  How long ago did you apply?  Remember, too, not all mail gets delivered, and there is a process of assignment to a scriba, etc., within the censorial cohors, which may take a while.  


Am I allowed to use my requested Roman name?

    ATS:  Reenactors use assumed names without benefit of Roman citizenship.  No reason why you can’t.  


Should
I use my Christian name until I get approval for my Roman name? The
gens name I requested is not typical, but it is used by other Nova
Roma members and I provided an explanation as to why I hoped to be
granted that name.

    ATS:  Cornuta is perfectly fine; we have at least a couple of Cornuti.  What praenomen did you request?  Only about 17 are acceptable, and any other choice (not that there are many) must be justified.    There is one female active member of the gens Agoria, as well as several of both sexes who apparently did not respond to the census.  Thus your nomen and cognomen should be fine unless they belong to an existing domus.  The question is the praenomen; you listed the initial S, which might mean Septima (not normal) or Sexta (correct abbreviation:  Sex., with a period after it), Servia or Spuria, respectively abbreviated as Ser. and Sp.  The praenomina allow very little variation, and it is best to choose one of the standard ones.  They did not perform the same functions as do our first names; they were abbreviated, and used alone only within the family and among close friends.  

Thanks- Ellen Catalina

    You’re welcome.  

 

aka S. Agoria Cornuta (?)

  Vale, et valete.  
      

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60991 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2009-02-09
Subject: Regulus & Maior Conversation was [ Re: Curious non-member with some
Cato Liviae Plautae sal.

There is much here, and I apologize for the snipping, but I'd like to get to the meat of the
discussion.

You wrote:

"Of course they thought it was acceptable. Those were times when there was no really
effective contraception, and abortion (despite the services of Bona Dea) was a very risky
business. So the only effective method of birth control was exposing children."

Here, I must accept your words, because I myself fully acknowledge that an historian
cannot judge a society by the norms or values of his/her own. I would only say that
neither practice was - or is - universally accepted in any society now or in the past.
Tertullian wrote: "You abandon your children in the street!" (Apologeticus IX), accusing the
Romans of immorality.

You wrote:

"No? Why not? If it is accepted by a big enough community, an activity
is by definition acceptable."

The classic response is, of course, Nazi Germany. What happened in that society was evil,
and no matter how many people either actively supported it or allowed it to continue by
passively accepting it, it is still evil.


You wrote:

"She, along with me and a few billion other people in the world, thinks that some of the
principles and ideas Christianity has promoted are innatural [sic], detrimental to the
personal well-being and happiness of people, and generally dangerous.

These ideas can be roughly divided into two spheres:
1. the attitude to sex and the human body, and
2. religious intolerance."


What did some Early Fathers write about the human condition - were they truly
detrimental?

Regarding women, Gregory Nanzianus wrote: "Why did they punish the woman but
considered the man innocent? The wife is considered sinful while the unfaithful man does
not suffer. I don't accept this legislation. I don't accept this tradition. Men are legislators
and all the laws are against women." (Sermon XXXVII).

Regarding slavery, John Chrysostomus wrote: "slavery is a fruit of covetousness, of
degradation, of savagery, since NoahÂ…had no servant, nor had Abel, nor Seth..." (Homily
XXII on the Ephesians);

Clement of Alexandria wrote: "Take away the robes and the jewellery of the masters and
you'll see, they are not different from their slaves, they are not superior at all." (The
Pedagogue I.12, III.6,11)


Maior, unfortunately, takes every chance she can get to ridicule and condescend to
Christians, an almost invariably can bring any discussion whatsoever into a "they think
this, the fools, while *we* can think *this*".


I appreciate your discrimination between Western thought and Orthodox thought; the
differences are enormous and the one theological point that strikes to the heart of this
matter is the difference in the teachings about the very nature of mankind itself.

The Roman/Western Church teaches that man is wholly sinful and degraded since the Fall
and cannot possibly do or be good in any way without the salvific Grace of God; we are
evil through and through and the corruption taints every aspect of our being, including
our sexuality.

The Orthodox Church teaches that man, as a creation of God and declared to be "very
good" by God Himself after his creation, cannot possibly do anything that can taint God's
own creation. We are inherently good, and the Fall affected our ability, not our nature.
The Greek word that has been translated as "sin" is "hamartia", which literally means "to
miss the mark", as in archery. Our goodness makes us want to hit the mark, we aim, and
sometimes we are unable to hit it. The saving Grace of God allows us to aim properly and
breach the gap separating us from the divine Nature; Christ's sacrifice allows us to enter
once again into our natural state of union with God - our natural state of goodness. Not
only that but our eventual goal is union with God - apotheosis.

Regarding sex, here are the words of St Maximus The Confessor:

"Â…he [St. Dionysuis] calls God the Bestower and Parent of benevolence (agapes) and of
love (erotos). For having these within Himself, He extended them outward, i.e., into the
realm of creation. And therefore it is said that God is love (I John 4:16), and in the Song of
Songs He is called love (Song 2:4), and sweetness and desire (Song 5:16), which is love."
(ON THE DIVINE NAMES, ch. 4.14)

The Early Fathers do, in fact, almost universally espouse virginity as the purest expression
of devotion to God; they do not condemn sexuality out of hand, however. It is an
obsession with sexuality as the ultimate expression of our being which is considered
incorrect, as with any passion or desire - food, clothing, etc. - which can be made to stand
between ourselves and the divine.

On the subject of religious intolerance, once again I concede the point, as I always have in
these discussions. Christianity is an ultimately EXclusive religion; no-one outside the
Faith is considered capable of a true relationship or union with God.

I think we'd best stop, though, before I find myself clothed in flames from angry
respondents.

Vale,

Cato
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60992 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2009-02-09
Subject: Regulus & Maior Conversation was [ Re: Curious non-member with some
Cato Varroni sal.

Salve!

The Church itself began, of course, in Jerusalem (the first Council of the Church was held
there in c. AD 49), then after the first great persecution (led by Saul, later Paul) spread to
Alexandria and Antioch; Greek-speaking, Hellenistic cities.

The earliest text of the New Testament was written in common or "koine" Greek. The many
texts in the dialects of the Old Testament had all been translated into a single language,
Greek, in the time of Ptolemy II Philadelphus in 200 BC; in c. AD 150, Justin Martyr wrote
the first exposition of Church liturgy, also in Greek.

All the first great Ecumenical Councils of the Church were held in Greek-speaking cities,
between AD 325 and AD 787. Of the Five Patriarchates of the Early Church - Jerusalem,
Antioch, Rome, Alexandria, and Constantinople - only Rome spoke Latin liturgically, and it
was a Latin translation of the Divine Liturgy from Greek.

Vale,

Cato
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60993 From: philippe cardon Date: 2009-02-09
Subject: Re: Regulus & Maior Conversation was [ Re: Curious non-member with s
i know all that very well (sorry)
but the calim that the eastern churches (orthodoxy) iare older than roman one (catholicism) is a bit tendencious because can we say that the pope broke th eunity of he church as Luther did for the catholics,
or are we obliged to believe the true christianity is orthodoxy? that is only an opinion
it is like to say Augstine was protestant, and yes he had a big influence upon the reformation theology but he was neither catholic in modern sense nor protestant
 
all christian cults can use the bible to prove its own theology
 
as someone else said in a previous mail, jeus cam to preach the Kingdom of heaven and the end of all earthly things, beginning by family so all try to build a christain theology for an established church, something earthly, is a little bold and daring... but so is life
 
if i were christain, i should have only one ideal Simeon Stylites
(and i don't say that in a bad way)
vale
Varo
 
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Monday, February 09, 2009 7:58 AM
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Regulus & Maior Conversation was [ Re: Curious non-member with some questions.]

Cato Varroni sal.

Salve!

The Church itself began, of course, in Jerusalem (the first Council of the Church was held
there in c. AD 49), then after the first great persecution (led by Saul, later Paul) spread to
Alexandria and Antioch; Greek-speaking, Hellenistic cities.

The earliest text of the New Testament was written in common or "koine" Greek. The many
texts in the dialects of the Old Testament had all been translated into a single language,
Greek, in the time of Ptolemy II Philadelphus in 200 BC; in c. AD 150, Justin Martyr wrote
the first exposition of Church liturgy, also in Greek.

All the first great Ecumenical Councils of the Church were held in Greek-speaking cities,
between AD 325 and AD 787. Of the Five Patriarchates of the Early Church - Jerusalem,
Antioch, Rome, Alexandria, and Constantinople - only Rome spoke Latin liturgically, and it
was a Latin translation of the Divine Liturgy from Greek.

Vale,

Cato


---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Orange vous informe que cet e-mail a été contrôlé par l'anti-virus mail.
Aucun virus connu à ce jour par nos services n'a été détecté.


Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60995 From: Metrobius Date: 2009-02-09
Subject: Re: A reminder from the praetor
Whoa, being a Roman doesn't mean you have an excuse to be a jerk. If being a New Roman means not feeling the need to flex your I-have-bad-social-skills-in-real-life-so-I-have-to-be-somebody-on-the-net muscles then to hell with joining. Everyone go there! Who wants to be a part of that? You're not even ethnically Roman and you're going to get on a high horse?

M. Sempronia Pulla

--- On Sun, 2/8/09, Maior <rory12001@...> wrote:
From: Maior <rory12001@...>
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: A reminder from the praetor
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Date: Sunday, February 8, 2009, 6:22 PM

Salve;
he's not a 'guest' this isnt a Victorian tea party; it's the forum of
Nova Roma, where cives meet and exchange ideas with vigor, a very
Roman thing to do...
Let him go to New Romans if he's sensitive!
M. Hortensia Maior--

- In Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com, Rich <wielgosz@.. .> wrote:
>
> On Sun, 2009-02-08 at 10:47 -0500, Gnaeus Equitius Marinus wrote:
>
> Salve,
>
> Thank you.
>
> Best,
> Rich...
>
>
> > Salvete quirites,
> >
> > We have a guest among us. Many who have responded to his queries have
> > been courteous and welcoming. Others seem to have forgotten their
> > manners. I recommend that anyone considering sending a remark that
> > seems snarky or cutting review the Edictum Sermone, which is
> > conveniently found in our files section and also appears here every
> > two weeks.
> >
> > In particular, since some seem unable to recognize this, the term
> > "role playing game" or RPG is perceived by many as a dismissive
> > insult
> > when applied to activities such as reenactment and living history
> > organizations. It is not for you to compartmentalize or diminish the
> > activity that someone else engages in.
> >
> > Valete,
> >
> > CN-EQVIT-MARINVS
> >
> >
> >
> >
>


Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60996 From: Cn. Cornelius Lentulus Date: 2009-02-09
Subject: R: [Nova-Roma] Another curious non-member with questions
Salve, Catalina!

The Censorial Office has taken care of your application, some technical problems might happen.

Now we will deal with your request for citizenship and sorry for the delay. A. Tullia Scholastica will be your assigned scribe, please wait for her e-mail.

Some suggestions for your Roman name.

Since your native name (Catalina) is perfectly able to be Latinized as a Roman cognomen, I encourage you to request Catalina instead of Cornuta.

Agoria is not an original Roman gens. We accept it, but perhaps you will find a more Roman nomen gentile.


Cura, ut valeas!
Cn. Lentulus
Co-Leader of the Censorial Office of Approbations





--- Lun 9/2/09, ellencatalina <ellencatalina@...> ha scritto:

Salve

I applied for citizenship (or probationary citizenship) via the Nova
Roma site online but I never heard anything back. Is there supposed to
be a confirmation? Am I allowed to use my requested Roman name? Should
I use my Christian name until I get approval for my Roman name? The
gens name I requested is not typical, but it is used by other Nova
Roma members and I provided an explanation as to why I hoped to be
granted that name.

Thanks- Ellen Catalina

aka S. Agoria Cornuta (?)



Passa a Yahoo! Mail.
La webmail che ti offre GRATIS spazio illimitato, antispam e messenger integrato.            
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60997 From: marcushoratius Date: 2009-02-09
Subject: a. d. V Eidus Februariae: Cato opposes Pompeius Magnus
M. Moravius Piscinus Quiritibus et omnibus salutem plurimam dicit:

Hodie est ante diem V Eidus Februariae; haec dies nefastus est:

"Five days after the Nones, when Venus, the Morning Star, has lifted
its brightness from the ocean waves, these are the first days of
spring. But don't be misled: cold days are still in wait for you,
departing winter leaves sharp traces behind." ~ Ovidius Naso, Fasti
2.149-152

"As soon as (Favonius) begins to prevail, it indicates that the time
has arrived for pruning the vine, weeding the corn, planting trees,
grafting fruit-trees, and trimming the olive, for its breezes are
productive of the most nutritious effects." ~ Pliny NH 18.77


AUC 696 / 57 BCE: Cato inveighs against Pompeius Magnus

"On the 9th of February, the Senate, meeting in the temple of Apollo,
passed a decree "that what had taken place on the 7th of February was
treasonable." On this day Cato warmly inveighed against Pompey, and
throughout his speech arraigned him as though he were at the bar. He
said a great deal about me, to my disgust, though it was in very
laudatory terms. When he attacked Pompey's perfidy to me, he was
listened to in profound silence on the part of my enemies. Pompey
answered him boldly with a palpable allusion to Crassus, and said
outright that 'he would take better precautions to protect his life
than Africanus (Scipio Aemilianus) had done, whom C. Carbo had
assassinated (129 BCE).' Accordingly, important events appear to me
to be in the wind. For Pompey understands what is going on, and
imparts to me that plots are being formed against his life, that
Gaius Cato is being supported by Crassus, that money is being
supplied to Clodius, that both are backed by Crassus and Curio, as
well as by Bibulus and his other detractors: that he must take
extraordinary precautions to prevent being overpowered by that
demagogue - with a people all but wholly alienated, a nobility
hostile, a senate ill-affected, and the younger men corrupt. So he is
making his preparations and summoning men from the country. On his
part, Clodius is rallying his gangs: a body of men is being got
together for the Quirinalia. For that occasion we are considerably in
a majority, owing to the forces brought up by Pompey himself: and a
large contingent is expected from Picenum and Gallia, to enable us to
throw out Cato's bills also about Milo and Lentulus." ~ M. Tullius
Cicero, Epist. Ad Quint. 2.3

Just months earlier Pompeius had entered Rome in triumph. It was
then that the crowds first hailed him as Magnus and when he was at
the height of his popularity. In 57 BCE he was given commission over
Rome's food supply for five years and had Cicero returned from exile.
Caesar would be away campaigning in Belgica this year. This left
Crassus and Pompeius to wrestle each other for control of the City.
Politically it became a tumultuous year. The one person opposing the
schemes of both Pompeius and Crassus was Cato. A rather clever
maneuver sent Cato away.

"A law was carried that Cyprus should be organized as a province and
the royal funds should be confiscated, and Marcus [Porcius] Cato was
sent to administer the matter." ~ Titus Livius, Perioche 104.6

However, Cato still had friends and family even while he was away.
Gaius Cato was elected tribune and would veto the elections. Marcus
Cato would return to run for the praetorship, but was defeated by
Vatinius. In the following year (55 BCE), "When this same man [Gaius
Cato] tried to obstruct a law in which provinces were allotted to the
consuls for five years (Hispania to Pompey, Syria and the Parthian
war to Crassus), he was put into irons by tribune Gaius Trebonius,
who had proposed the law (Perioche 105.3)." Cicero returned in 57 BCE
supported by Pompeius, and he in turn supporting Pompeius, thinking
that all would soon be set right at Rome with the ascendancy of his
patron Pomeius Magnus. In hindsight it is now seen how in its 450th
year the seeds were planted that would unravel the Republic.


Our thought for today is from the Emperor Marcus Aurelius,
Meditations 5.22:

"That which does no harm to the state, does no harm to the citizen.
In the case of every appearance of harm apply this rule: if the state
is not harmed by this, neither am I harmed. But if the state is
harmed, you must not be angry with him who does harm to the state.
Instead show him where his error is."
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60998 From: segestamilius Date: 2009-02-09
Subject: Re: Crusades question and NOT the start of a flame war
"State of the World at the epoch of the crusades, from 1096 to 1273

Rome and Germany were the dominating powers of the west; both
assumed the right of creating kings , to which the former added that
of deposing them. The quarrel of investitures , begun by Henry IV
and Gregory VII , set Europe in flames. The nobles took this
opportunity of securing their independence ; anarchy reigned in the
cities; and the fields were ravaged by undisciplined bands of armed
men.
France began to assume a more tranquil position , the number of
states being greatly diminished ; but there still remained several
powerful vassals. The Dukes of Normandy , become more formidable
since the conquest of England , had subjected sovereigns of
Brittany ; and the Duke of Aquitaine reigned over the vast territory
lying between the Loire and the Pyrenees, the Cevennes and the
ocean. The greater part of Languedoc obeyed the Counts of Toulouse ;
those of Flanders added to their possession of that fertile country
the submission of their neighbors ; and the Counts of Champagne
enjoyed that rich part of France which still bears the name. The
Dukes of Burgundy , attached to the monarchy by the closet ties of
blood , governed from the banks of the Loire to the Straits of
Dover.
In Spain two Kings were the terror of the Moors : Sancho , who
united Navarre to Aragon; and Alphonso of Castile, who gradually
extended his southern frontier . Meanwhile, the new Count of
Portugal planted the banner of Christianity on the banks of the
Tagus.
England , under the resolute conqueror William , was at once
oppressed by his actions and strengthened by his prudence.
Bohemia... increased by the conquest of Poland , became a
remarkable power and sided with the Emperor , who had conferred the
regal title on its chiefs .
Hungary.. In a weaker state , supported the interests of the pope ,
who had given its princes a crown. Poland was one wide scene of
confusion, under dukes without talent and without authority. Sweden,
Denmark , and Russia were still in obscurity. Apulia , Calabria and
Sicily, reunited under the warlike Normans, were respected in the
west, being at once the terror of the Greek Empire , and the
protectors of Italy.
The Greek Empire , long tending towards its fall, and undermined by
all the evils which can destroy a state , was still preserved by the
extreme prudence and sagacity Alexius Comnenus.
Venice and Genoa were the only maritime powers in the West; but
being , rivals in navigation and commerce , they began to view each
other with jealousy , and to nourish in secret the seeds of those
quarrels which eventually proved fatal to both.
The Caliphs of Bagdad were deprived of all but their sacerdotal
power; their Empire was under the dominion of the Turks. Five
thrones in Asia were filled by these warriors: 1. Persia, whose
Sultan reigned supreme from Armenia to the Indus. 2. Antioch and
Syria . 3. Damascus and Palestine , 4. Cilicia and the adjacent
provinces , 5. Nice, the seat of Soliman , governor of Bithynia .
The Caliphs of Cairo with difficulty maintained themselves upon the
throne of Egypt : the Miramolians of Africa were subdued by the
Kings of Morocco , who protected the Saracen power in Spain, and
were the greatest obstacle to the Castilian monarchs.

The Crusades..............Peter the Hermit.

during many centuries the devout Christians of all countries had
gratified their curiosity or excited their piety by laborious
pilgrimages to the Holy Land , the theatre of the mission and
sufferings of their blessed Lord. When at length Palestine fell
under the dominion of the Saracens — and still later , when the
Turkish hordes overran it, these visits became more dangerous , and
perhaps , on that very account , more numerous. The humble and
defenseless palmers were treated with great contumely; and, becoming
victims of private rapine or public oppression , they often sank
within sight of the object for which they had encountered
innumerable perils. Their piteous tale of suffering excited the
sympathy of Christendom , when the letters of Alexius and the
eloquence of Peter the Hermit set fire " to that inflammable mass of
enthusiasm that pervaded Europe". The zealous apostle of the Holy
War had been himself an eyewitness of the suffering of the natives
and pilgrims of Palestine."


The Crusades where the acts of those persons with a Faith in
Christ , who were really just victims of their own sense of piety,
as well as geo-political tools of the many warlords in Europe and
Asia, , all caught between the vise of piety and the anvil of greed.
This is what happens when civilizations collide.












--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Gallagher <spqr753@...> wrote:
>
>
> Salve Regulus who said in part
>
> "but instigated them (I.e. the Crusades). "
>
> I have been wondering for some time what the public view is of the
nature of the Crusades.
> Could you please inform me what you believe them to have been.
This is not an invitation
> for a flame war and before anyone yells OT , we are Romans of the
28th century and are adult
> enough to talk about anything that has occurred since one A.U C.
>
> Vale
>
> Tiberius Galerius Paulinus
>
>
>
>
> To: Nova-Roma@...: t.annaevsregvlvs@...: Sun, 8 Feb 2009 14:53:54 -
0330Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Bona Dea and Roman culture [Regulus &
Maior Conversation]
>
>
>
>
> Salve Maior,
>
> I agree it was not a theocracy. I am merely saying that power is
power and that in different eras, there were different forms of
power, but it was always closely controlled by the influential
people of the time. If one is even passingly acquainted with
Mediaeval history, the number of 'nullifications' of marriages that
were awarded to influential persons is quite surprising even
while 'divorce' remained immoral for the common people (as a case in
point of convenience vs. conviction). Roman Catholicism is my faith,
but I am aware that the Church has been a highly political body
throughout its history. The discussion now is purely academic, so by
no means feel that I may become offended.
>
> Your point on the sanctity of the Bona Dea cult is what caused me
to comment earlier that introducing the suppression of abortion as
part of religion was a very shrewd maneuver in later ages. Religion
has always been a very powerful moral force and can often defy
reasoned argument. The main difference being (imo) that in the
Republican era, there were many deities and so it would be difficult
to affect the moral landscape of the entire culture. In later eras,
there was only one large religious institution that dominated the
entire Western World. If a Pope decided to ban or suppress a certain
practice, it was so. Thus it was that powerful men of the time could
approach the Church and request these measures be implemented. It is
basically the exact same situation as Augustus rewarding fertile
matrons, except for the different time and circumstances. But, as I
have said earlier, power is power, and the pragmatism of rulers has
been a common theme throughout Western history.
>
> I would have to say the Church has been thoroughly influenced by
secular concerns throughout its existence. Even the briefest
acquaintance with Jesus and His teachings in the Bible would
illustrate a complete rejection of violence towards anyone. However
the Church has not only condoned war, but instigated them (I.e. the
Crusades). You will find that the demands of the present often have
had massive influence on the Church' position on its tenets. Thus
while I cannot speak with certainty on why a Pope would ban
abortion, considering the previous Church's acceptance of the
practice, I would say it is most probable that it was through the
influence of current events more so than a deep conviction that
caused it to be implemented.
>
> The differences of era and religion do play a part, especially in
the actors present, but I like to see the commonalities between
Roman culture and modern culture (since that is what we are all
about) rather than the differences. Very interesting topic indeed,
excellent conversation.
>
> Vale,
> Regulus
>
>
>
> From: Maior
> Sent: Sunday, February 08, 2009 1:02 AM
> To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [Nova-Roma] Bona Dea and Roman culture [Regulus & Maior
Conversation]
>
>
> Salve Regule;Republican Rome wasn't a secular society like France
nor was it a theocracy. It's true senators were pontifexes and
augurs but old cults could not be changed, Romans had a deep
reverence for ancient practice. So not even the Senate would not,
could not interfere with the priestesses of Bona Dea.In your
discussion of your family cultus, I'm at a total cultural loss and
an intellectual one. I do know until fairly recently Western culture
equated sexuality with evil, forbid birth control and abortion as
well as divorce. If it was that calculated it was deeply shrewd. It
only came around 1998 to Ireland! perhaps Livia Plauta or Albucius
or Dexter will be able to further the conversation; I've retitled it
to invite further discussion. Fascinating topic. optime valeMaior>
Salve Maior,> > Haha, well it started out as depicting the 'huge
difference between Judaeo-Christian and Republican Roman' views on
abortion (regardless of what you are saying now, because I agree it
is an interesting tidbit of Roman culture) and the RC church
represents the majority of Judaeo-Christians (in a numerical sense)
so I hardly think we can have a decent discussion if you refuse to
consider the majority of the people you made the comment about. My
point was simply that it is not a matter of religious necessity for
the Christian world either, but of princes and bishops having the
same desire as Roman aristocracy; more hands to hold plows and
swords. The fact that they managed to get it introduced as part of
religion (which is much harder to change than rational decisions)
makes it all the more effective, but doesn't represent anything
other than the exact same motives as Roman aristocrats and different
circumstances. Besides, as I'm constantly told, the Roman State and
Religion were inextricably intertwined and so if you say the State
controlled it, then I assume the Religio would have had much
influence as well.> > Regulus> > > From: Maior > Sent: Saturday,
February 07, 2009 6:47 PM> To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com > Subject:
[Nova-Roma] Re: Curious non-member with some questions.> > >
Regule;> frankly I don't care that the RC church was/is against
birth> control or was for/against abortion. That's a private cultus
with no> interest to me.> What I'm saying is that this is a good
example of Roman culture,> where political conservatives might
complain that Roman women were not> bearing enough chiidren, What
could they do? very little, Except> Augustus who rewarded matrons
who had 3 children, you see it's the> state who is involved in this
issue in Rome.> optime vale> Maior> > >> > Salve Maior,> > > > You
must be looking at a different church than I. =) My mother's> family
is traditional Irish Catholic. I can think of few families in> my
grandparents' generation of less than 10 children (my grandmother>
had 15 siblings), and my mother had 6 siblings. I can't speak to>
motives, but I can't argue with the results. It is no coincidence
that> there are over 1,000,000,000 Catholics. Considering the early
Church> had no laws against abortion (in fact St. Augustine of Hippo
Regius> wrote that abortion is not a murder since a fetus would have
no soul),> I can see no reason for later Church leaders to add it
(in the face of> previous precedent) except for the obvious benefits
of increased> manpower. Besides, when you consider that the Church
generally frowns> upon sexual activity, it becomes even more
apparent that this frequent> sanctimonious shagging belief was more
a matter of convenience than> conviction. I will also say that the
Church has historically provided> support for the orphans that this
sort of practice inevitably creates,> so hats off for supporting
their practice, but I do not think that the> anti-abortion (pro-
life?) movement is anything intrinsically> Judaeo-Christian. Just to
keep pumping out missionaries, priests,> nuns, monks and crusades
one needs a large pool of manpower.> > > > Vale,> > Regulus> > > > >
> From: Maior > > Sent: Saturday, February 07, 2009 4:54 PM> > To:
Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com > > Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Curious non-
member with some questions.> > > > > > Salve Regule;> > you're not
asking why Roman conservatives didn't like it:) They> > wanted more
Roman boys! A very different attitude than today And> > that's the
big point I'm tying to make about Republican culture. > > > > great
discussion to have,> > valeas Maior> > > > >> > > Salve Maior,> > >
> > > If conservative Romans railed against it then, and
conservatives> > rail against it now, I don't see why you would make
it into a> > religious matter. Perhaps it has more to do with
conservatives than> > religion? =) > > > > > > I'm sure if you asked
a Roman Catholic priest he wouldn't be too> > smitten with the idea
of abortion of course, but I don't think anyone> > would accuse the
Catholic church of being overly progressive. Pretty> > clear
parallels could be drawn between the masses that choose to use> >
the service, and a conservative portion of the population that> >
disagrees with it both then and now. I know here in Canada most
people> > are at least nominally Christian, and yet our public
health-care> > system permits abortions without embracing Republican
values.> > > > > > Vale,> > > Titus Annaeus Regulus> > > > > > > > >
From: Maior > > > Sent: Saturday, February 07, 2009 4:05 PM> > > To:
Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com > > > Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Curious non-
member with some questions.> > > > > > > > > Maior Ricardo
quiritibus spd:> > > this discussion has inspired me to want Vox
Romana to do a piece> > > on Bona Dea and her temple in Rome.> > >
The precincts of this ancient goddess' temple were only open to> > >
women and Bona Dea's priestesses operated a kind of pharmacy where>
> > women could obtain abortificants.> > > > > > I shocked, really
freaked out a lot of people on a latin list with> > > this knowledge
that a common culture existed where abortion was just> > > fine and
pretty easily obtainable (though conservative Romans would> > > rail
against it)> > > > > > So here is a good example of a huge cultural
difference between> > > Republican polytheistic Rome and moderns
with their Judae-Christian> > > backgrounds. Of course as Nova Roma
we follow Republican Rome!> > > optime vale> > > M. Hortensia Maior>
> > Flaminica Carmentalis> > > Producer Vox Romana podcast> > > > >
> >> > > > SaIve Ricarde;> > > > I'm M. Hortensia Maior producer of
Vox Romana podcast, actually> > > > Saturninus wrote to me not too
long ago about the next podcast,> but I> > > > was super busy. If
you are interested please write to me. I> would like> > > > to see
another one go out.> > > > > > > > As for just 2 people, I live in
Chapel Hill, NC near Duke with 2 big> > > > classics dept and I was
the only Nova Roman here. But I met new> civis> > > > M. Aelia
Connonia and then this last summer Q. Caelia Laeta who> > > >
joined. Yes we're two but now we meet and study and try to speak>
Latin> > > > together, discuss NR and we're thinking of celebrating
maybe the> > > > Floralia and having a big party making Roman food
and putting up a> > > > poster at these departments...So you see you
can recruit.> > > > > > > > Nova Roma is a culture its not the SCA
at all.There is no fantasy in> > > > what we're doing..> > > > If
you ignore politics,religio, etc you're missing out on being> > > >
fully Roman on interacting as a 21st century Roman. We are not> RPG
we> > > > re the rebirth the revival of Roman culture, Roman values
in the> 21st> > > > century. It's a wholistic experience.> > > > I
hoped I've cleared things up for you. Do write, epistulum mihi> > >
scrivas> > > > valeas> > > > Maior> > > > > > > > > > > > In Nova-
Roma@yahoogroups.com, Rich <wielgosz@> wrote:> > > > >> > > > > On
Sat, 2009-02-07 at 00:57 -0500, A. Tullia Scholastica wrote:> > > >
> > > > > > > I live east of Syracuse NY. That's the biggest
population> > > > > > center> > > > > > nearest to me.> > > > > > >
> > > > > Scholastica: and there may be some citizens around> > >
there,> > > > > > too, though NYC is a better bet. As earlier, Iâ?Tm
here> > > too,> > > > > > not ALL that far away. > > > > > > > > > >
Absolutely. But two people do not exactly make for the kind of> > >
social> > > > > event I was imagining. :-)> > > > > > > > > > > I
have communicated with a few people off list, actually. I> > > > > >
produce a> > > > > > podcast and thought I might like to get
involved with a> > > > > > podcast produced> > > > > > by Nova
Romans. That collaboration hasn't happened yet.> > > > > > > > > > >
> Scholastica: Nor is it likely. The producer is in grad> > > > > >
school, and the technical person is busy with two little> > > > > >
preschool kids and a lot of other things, including a broken> > > >
> > server for the Academia Thules, which has been our> > >
educational> > > > > > arm, so to speak, though it is technically
unrelated to NR.> > > > > > There are other issues there as well. >
> > > > > > > > > Well, I'm too busy with my podcast to get involved
in the> production> > > > > of another at this time, anyway.
Although an OFFICIAL Nova Roma> > > podcast> > > > > sounds like a
great way to increase membership.> > > > > > > > > > Regards,> > > >
> Rich...> > > > >> > > >> > >> >>
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 60999 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2009-02-09
Subject: Fwd: Salvete, Roma aeterna vobis salutem dicit .
Attachments :

    Salvete, Roma aeterna   vobis salutem dicit .

    We have the pleasure to inform you that another day has been added to the VADIS AL MAXIMO  revival of the Roman Empire. The event that will be held in Rome, Italy, will take place the days 15, 16, 17, 18 October 2009. The calendar of the event is still not complete but we can anticipate that will have an opening ceremony Thursday October 15 evening, followed by on Friday morning quadriga’s training sessions, races and war displays in the afternoon, gladiators and races again at night. With finals on Sunday the event will arrive at the closing of the games in the evening.

    To complement the First Gladiator Maximus Trophy, we have added the Legionis Romane competition where the participant legions will show marching and battle techniques. Best show and costumes will gain substantial cash prices.
    In order to participate at this event and their benefit packages, the participating legionnaires  and gladiators groups will have to submit us  a short video of their performance for evaluation purposes. Videos and pictures to be sent to:  trofei@... . A group of experts in Roman History will analyze them in order to establish the programming.

    It is imperative that we receive the material before the end of March 2009.

    A Castrum Romanum will be prepared for those legionnaires and families that they do not want to go to hotels.  This accommodation will be considerably less expensive but we do need an early reservation.  The Castrum will have also a Roman Taberna with restaurant service.

    We are still  working with travel agencies in order to present you discount packages including  airfare, hotel and tickets.

    Our web site  www.vadisalmaximo.com, will reflect all this information in the next few days.

    Thank You

    Roma  adventum vostrum plauso maximo expectat .

    Mauritius Comellus Carliis
    mauritius@...

     

    ATTENTION: We are aware that an unknown group is trying to divert some legions out of Vadis Al  Maximo event and are contacting them: this people has nothing to do with Vadis Al Maximo team and its organization. Vadis Al Maximo srl is the only entity that will bring you in the heart of Rome and the Cesar’s Forum.

     

    Group: Nova-Roma Message: 61000 From: Chantal Gaudiano Date: 2009-02-09
    Subject: (no subject)
    Maior dicit:

    "...I would say all this concord is due to Gn. Cornelius Lentulus sacerdos Concordiae. Isn't he effective! Vales"

    Hehe! I couldn't agree more! Yea, Lentulus!

    Paulla Corva
    Group: Nova-Roma Message: 61001 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2009-02-09
    Subject: Regulus & Maior Conversation was [ Re: Curious non-member with some
    Cato Varroni sal.

    Salve!

    Varro, you wrote (in part):

    "but the calim that the eastern churches (orthodoxy) iare older than roman one
    (catholicism) is a bit tendencious...or are we obliged to believe the true christianity is
    orthodoxy? that is only an opinion..."

    Precisely - and that is exactly the claim that the Orthodox Church makes :)

    You also wrote:

    "if i were christain, i should have only one ideal Simeon Stylites (and i don't say that in a
    bad way)"

    and the vast majority - the overwhelming majority - of the Early Fathers would agree with
    you; celibate monasticism was (and to some extent, still is) looked upon as the ultimate
    expression of devotion to God. It is balanced to some extent by the command "go ye into
    all the world and preach My gospel to every creature, baptizing them in the Name of the
    Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit."

    One thing which I believe that Orthodoxy and the Religio have in common is the idea that,
    ultimately, the divine Nature(s) is/are ineffable; we cannot possibly truly understand the
    nature(s) of the God(s), and it is not necessarily the most important thing that we do so,
    but we are bound to obedience to Their will in order to bring peace and balance to the
    world. Who the Gods are is less important than what They do.

    In the Religio, the divine says, "make this sacrifice on this day and do it in such-and-such
    a manner, and you will have fulfilled a contractual obligation with Me and I will probably
    reward you according to our contract"; the Religio is inextricably bound to the very being
    of the State. In exactly the same way, the Eastern Empire saw the emperor as Vice-Gerent
    of God on earth, the Equal to the Apostles, and the health and well-being of the State
    depended upon the Church (with the emperor at its head) obeying the commands of God.

    Vale!

    Cato
    Group: Nova-Roma Message: 61002 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2009-02-09
    Subject: a.d. V kal. Feb. - Apollo
    Cato omnes in foro SPD

    Salvete!

    "I will remember and not be unmindful of Apollo who shoots afar. As he goes through the
    house of Zeus, the gods tremble before him and all spring up from their seats when he
    draws near, as he bends his bright bow. But Leto alone stays by the side of Zeus who
    delights in thunder; and then she unstrings his bow, and closes his quiver, and takes his
    archery from his strong shoulders in her hands and hangs them on a golden peg against a
    pillar of his father's house. Then she leads him to a seat and makes him sit: and the Father
    gives him nectar in a golden cup welcoming his dear son, while the other gods make him
    sit down there, and queenly Leto rejoices because she bare a mighty son and an archer.
    Rejoice, blessed Leto, for you bare glorious children, the lord Apollo and Artemis who
    delights in arrows; her in Ortygia, and him in rocky Delos, as you rested against the great
    mass of the Cynthian hill hard by a palm-tree by the streams of Inopus." - Homer,
    Hymn to the Delian Apollo

    In ancient Greece, today was dedicated to Apollo. The son of Zeus and Leto, and the twin
    brother of Artemis. Apollo was the god of music (principally the lyre, and he directed the
    choir of the Muses) and also of prophecy, colonization, medicine, archery (but not for war
    or hunting), poetry, dance, intellectual inquiry and the carer of herds and flocks. He was
    also a god of light, known as "Phoebus" (radiant or beaming, and he was sometimes
    identified with Helios the sun god). He was also the god of plague and was worshiped as
    Smintheus (from sminthos, rat) and as Parnopius (from "parnops", grasshopper) and was
    known as the destroyer of rats and locust, and according to Homer's Iliad, Apollo shot
    arrows of plague into the Greek camp. Apollo being the god of religious healing would
    give those guilty of murder and other immoral deeds a ritual purification. Sacred to Apollo
    are the swan (one legend says that Apollo flew on the back of a swan to the land of the
    Hyperboreans, he would spend the winter months among them), the wolf and the dolphin.
    His attributes are the bow and arrows, on his head a laurel crown, and the cithara (or lyre)
    and plectrum. But his most famous attribute is the tripod, the symbol of his prophetic
    powers.

    When the goddesss Hera, the wife of Zeus (it was he who had coupled with Leto) found out
    about Leto's pregnancy, she was outraged with jealousy. Seeking revenge Hera forced Leto
    to roam the earth in search of a place to give birth. Sicne Hera had forbidden Leto to stay
    anywhere on earth, either on terra-ferma or an island at sea, the only place to seek shelter
    was Delos, being in the center of the Aegean, and also difficult to reach, as there were
    strong under-currents, because it was said to be a floating island. Because it was a
    floating island, it was not considered either of Hera's prohibitions, and so Leto was able to
    give birth to the divine twins Apollo and Artemis (before Leto gave birth to Apollo, the
    island was encircled by a flock of swans, this is why the swan was sacred to him). As a
    gesture of thanks Delos was secured to the sea-bed by four columns to give it
    stability, and from then on it became one of the most important sanctuaries to Apollo. (A
    variation of Apollo's birth was that the jealous Hera had incarcerated Ilithyia, the goddess
    of childbirth, but the other gods intervened forcing Hera to release Ilithyia, which
    allowed Leto to give birth).

    "I sprang upon the ship in the form of a dolphin, pray to me as Apollo Delphinius; also the
    altar itself shall be called Delphinius ..." - Homer, Hymn to the Pythian Apollo 493

    Apollo's first achievement was to rid Pytho (Delphi) of the serpent (or dragon) Python. This
    monstrous beast protected the sanctuary of Pytho from its lair beside the Castalian Spring.
    There it stood guard while the "Sibyl" gave out her prophecies as she inhaled the trance
    inducing vapors from an open chasm. Apollo killed Python with his bow and arrows
    (Homer wrote "he killed the fearsome dragon Python, piercing it with his darts"). Apollo
    not only took charge of the oracle but rid the neighboring countryside of widespread
    destruction, as Python had destroyed crops, sacked villages and polluted streams
    and springs. However, to make amends for killing Python, as the fearsome beast was the
    son of Gaia, Apollo had to serve king Admetus for nine years (in some versions eight) as a
    cowherd. This he did, and when he returned to Pytho he came in the guise of a dolphin
    bringing with him priests from Crete (Apollo's cult title "Delphinios" meaning
    dolphin or porpoise, is probably how Delphi was so named). After killing Python and
    taking possession of the oracle, the god of light (Phobus) became known as "Pythian
    Apollo". He dedicated a bronze tripod to the sanctuary and bestowed divine powers on
    one of the priestesses, and she became known as the "Pythia". It was she who
    inhaled the hallucinating vapors from the fissure in the temple floor, while she sat on a
    tripod chewing laurel leaves. After she mumbled her answer, a male priest would translate
    it for the supplicant. Delphi became the most important oracle center of Apollo.

    Apollo, as with Zeus his father, had many love affairs with goddesses and mortals. Apollo's
    infatuation for the nymph Daphne, which had been invoked by the young god of love Eros,
    because Apollo had mocked him, saying his archery skills were pathetic, and Apollo's
    singing had also irritated him. Daphne was the beautiful daughter of the river god
    Ladon, and she was constantly pursued by Apollo. To escape from Apollo's insistent
    behavior, she fled to the mountains, but the persistent Apollo followed her. Annoyed by
    this, she asked the river god Peneus for help, which he did. As soon as Apollo approached
    Daphne, he tried to embrace her, but when he stretched out his arms she transformed into
    a laurel tree. Apollo, distraught by what had happened, made the laurel his sacred tree.

    Apollo also loved Cyrene, another nymph, and she bore Apollo a son: Aristaeus, a
    demi-god, who became a protector of cattle and fruit trees, and a deity of hunting,
    husbandry and bee-keeping. He taught men dairy skills and the use of nets and traps in
    hunting.

    The most famous mortal loves of Apollo was Hecuba, she was the wife of Priam, the king
    of Troy. She bore him Troilius. Foretold by an oracle, as long as Troilius reached the age of
    twenty, Troy could not be defeated. But the hero Achilles ambushed and killed him, when
    the young prince and his sister Polyxena secretly visited a spring. Apollo also fell in love
    with Cassandra, the sister of Troilius, and daughter of Hecuba and Priam. He seduced
    Cassandra on the promise that he would teach her the art of prophecy, but having learnt
    the prophetic art she rejected him. Apollo, being angry of her rejection punished her, by
    declaring her prophecies never to be accepted or believed.

    Asclepius, the god of healing, was also Apollo's offspring, after his union with Coronis,
    who was daughter of Phlegyas, king of the Lapiths. While she was pregnant by Apollo,
    Coronis fell in love with Ischys, son of Elatus, but a crow informed Apollo of the affair.
    Apollo sent his twin sister Artemis to kill Coronis, and Artemis carried out he brothers
    wishes. While her body was burning on the funeral pyre, Apollo removed the unborn child,
    and took him to Chiron, who raised the child Asclepius.

    Apollo also, fell in love with Hyacinthus, a Spartan prince. He was very handsome and
    athletic, which inflamed the passions of Apollo. One day while Apollo and Hyacinthus were
    practicing throwing the discus, Zephyrus, the god of the west wind, who was also
    attracted to the young prince, and jealous of Apollo's amorous affection towards the boy,
    made the discus veer off course by blowing an ill wind. The discus, which Apollo had
    thrown, hit Hyacinthus, smashing his skull. Apollo rushed to him, but he was dead. The
    god was overcome with grief, but to immortalize the love he had for the beautiful youth,
    he had a flower grow were his blood had stained the earth.

    Apollo also loved the young boy Cyparissus, a descendant of Heracles. The impassioned
    Apollo gave Cyparissus a sacred deer, as a love token. The young deer became tame,
    and was the constant companion of the boy, until a tragic accident occurred. As the young
    deer lay sleeping in the shade of the undergrowth, Cyparissus threw his javelin, which by
    chance hit, and killed the deer. Grief-stricken by what had happened, Cyparissus
    wanted to die. He asked Apollo to let his tears fall for all eternity. With apprehension
    Apollo transformed the boy into a tree, the cypress, which became the symbol of sorrow,
    as the sap on its trunk forms droplets, like tears.

    Apollo could also be ruthless when he was angered. The mortal Niobe, boasted to Apollo's
    mother Leto, that she had fourteen children (in some versions six or seven), which must
    make her more superior than Leto, who had only bore two. Apollo greatly angered by this
    slew her sons, and Artemis killed Niobe's daughters. Niobe wept so much that she turned
    into a pillar of stone. Apollo was infuriated when the satyr Marsyas challenged Apollo to
    music contest. After winning the competition, Apollo had Marsyas flayed alive, for being
    so presumptuous, as to challenge a god.


    Valete bene!

    Cato
    Group: Nova-Roma Message: 61003 From: Q. Caecilius Metellus Date: 2009-02-09
    Subject: Re: de Lentulo
    Metellus Coruae salutem.

    > Maior dicit:
    >
    > "...I would say all this concord is due to Gn. Cornelius Lentulus sacerdos Concordiae. Isn't he effective! Vales"
    >
    > Hehe! I couldn't agree more! Yea, Lentulus!
    >
    > Paulla Corva

    Indeed, that Lentulus is a good man. Sometimes the quiet sort (and those are
    the ones to worry about most! :)), but a good man. Quite a fine Roman specimen,
    wouldn't you say?
    Group: Nova-Roma Message: 61004 From: Lucia Livia Plauta Date: 2009-02-09
    Subject: Regulus & Maior Conversation was [ Re: Curious non-member with some
    Plauta Catoni sal.

    I snipped a lot too.

    >Tertullian wrote: "You abandon your children in the
    street!" (Apologeticus IX), >accusing the Romans of immorality.

    The contrast between the two moral systems existed before
    Christianity, because Jews and Egiptians didn't expose children.
    Christians probably mutuated this from Jews.

    >The classic response is, of course, Nazi Germany. What happened in
    that >society was evil,
    >and no matter how many people either actively supported it or
    allowed it to >continue by
    >passively accepting it, it is still evil.

    This would require a long discussion on the power of propaganda,
    which might not be appropriate here.
    It's not precise to suggest that everybody in Germany either
    supported or allowed the holocaust. Many people didn't know. Among
    those who knew, a surprising percentage committed suicide in guilt
    later.
    Anyway, if your point is that moral relativism has a limit, point
    taken.


    >What did some Early Fathers write about the human condition - were
    they truly
    >detrimental?

    Cato, remember I said that some points of christian doctrine were
    detrimental, not that all of them were.

    >Regarding women, Gregory Nanzianus wrote: "Why did they punish the
    woman >but considered the man innocent? The wife is considered sinful
    while the >unfaithful man does not suffer. I don't accept this
    legislation. I don't accept this >tradition. Men are legislators and
    all the laws are against women." (Sermon >XXXVII).

    Well, unfortunately it seems this Gregory didn't gain a large
    following.

    >Regarding slavery, John Chrysostomus wrote: "slavery is a fruit of
    >covetousness, of degradation, of savagery, since Noah.had no
    servant, nor had >Abel, nor Seth..." (Homily XXII on the Ephesians);

    Slavery was considered a necessary evil before Christianism, and
    Christians took no steps to abolish it (and never even considered
    doing so). It continued well into the Middle Ages. Slavs were the
    main objects of slavery then, so much that the very name of their
    ethnic group substituted the previous word for "slave", "servus".

    >Clement of Alexandria wrote: "Take away the robes and the jewellery
    of the >masters and you'll see, they are not different from their
    slaves, they are not >superior at all." (The Pedagogue I.12, III.6,11)

    So did several pagan philosophers before him. In fact, this was a
    widely accepted view in antiquity.
    And Rome was one of the societies where slaves had the best
    perspectives of being freed.


    >Maior, unfortunately, takes every chance she can get to ridicule and
    >condescend to Christians, an almost invariably can bring any
    discussion >whatsoever into a "they think this, the fools, while *we*
    can think *this*".

    Cato, that's the same thing I do. I just try to be more subtle about
    it.
    For me this has a lot to do with being brought up as an atheist,
    thinking organized religions were a relic of the past, rooted in
    ignorance, that would be eventually swept away by progress and
    rationality. A few million Italians of my generation had the same
    education, and I'm not the only one who keeps being surprised and
    shocked at the things some people can believe.
    Sorry, it really can't be helped.


    Thank you for the precise exposition of the differences between
    Eastern and Western Church (snipped). It seems that it's really a big
    difference in doctrine that explains the difference in attitude
    toward the human body and sex.
    The Orthodox attitude really seems to be a lot more positive, and not
    damaging at all.

    Optime vale,
    Livia
    Group: Nova-Roma Message: 61005 From: Lucia Livia Plauta Date: 2009-02-09
    Subject: Regulus & Maior Conversation was [ Re: Curious non-member with some
    Salve Catalina,
    no, in general Romans did not take particular care of the
    environment. Their exploitation led to the extintion of afium, a
    plant relative of assafoetida, and to the extintion of various animal
    species in North Africa.

    The notable exceptions were sacred groves and grounds. Those enjoyed
    a protection equivalent to that of national parks today (and much
    more effective).

    Apparently also the long strips of pine forests on Italy's coastlines
    were planted by the Romans. And we are definitely thankful for that,
    because there's nothing better than these natural providers of shade
    (and pine seeds) when going to the seaside. Unfortunately a lot of
    them were ruined in the last 50 years, when environmental destruction
    took on an unprecedented scale.

    Anyway, while environmental awareness was not necessarirly a trait of
    Religio in ancient times, that doesn't mean that it can't be for us
    in the present. In fact, I suspect this is, consciously or
    unconsciously, an important part of the attraction neopagan cults
    hold on people these days.

    Optime vale,
    Livia

    PS: On another theme, I would join Lentulus in recommending you to
    use Catalina, and not Cornuta, as your cognomen (or anything but
    Cornuta). You see, in Italian "cornuta" means, as in Latin, someone
    with horns, but the secondary meaning is "someone who's being
    betrayed by their spouse". In all neolatin languages it's quite a
    heavy insult, and it's something I would consider ill-omened for a
    nickname. I have a sneaking suspiction that this meaning was already
    present in the original Latin.



    Salve
    > Salve
    >
    > Livia said :
    >
    > "For Christians (for all of them, right from the origins) the human
    >
    > body was just a filthy temporary receptacle for the soul, which
    would
    >
    > be "freed" from it in death."
    >
    > Livia- one could make the same case for the way the Christians'
    regard the earth itself (it is merely a way station on the way to
    eternal salvation in heaven) and the resulting lack of stewardship
    over nature resulting in devestation of the land.
    >
    > Would the Roman pagans have taken better care of forests, water,
    and so forth? It certainly seems that many pagan cults (especially
    the more animist ones) would have taken greater care with the
    environment. -Ellen
    >
    Group: Nova-Roma Message: 61006 From: Gnaeus Caelius Ahenobarbus Date: 2009-02-09
    Subject: Regulus & Maior Conversation was [ Re: Curious non-member with some
    Cn. Caelius Ahenobarbus C. Equitio Catoni s.p.d.

    --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Gaius Equitius Cato" <mlcinnyc@...>
    wrote:
    > The classic response is, of course, Nazi Germany.
    >What happened in that society was evil,
    >and no matter how many people either actively supported it or
    >allowed it to continue by passively accepting it, it is still evil.

    I call "Godwin's Law" due to the reductio ad Nazium (
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Godwin%27s_law ); you lose the argument
    by default.
    "Evil" is a value judgment. To you, it was evil; to others, it was
    not. For example, I consider fast food restaurants "evil". Do actions
    have inherent ethical considerations, or are they only actions? Do
    words have inherent values, or are they just packets of meaning? Ah,
    philosophy. :-)
    Oh, why am I dragging out this silliness?
    Group: Nova-Roma Message: 61007 From: Maior Date: 2009-02-09
    Subject: Regulus & Maior Conversation was [ Re: Curious non-member with some
    Maior Varroni sal;
    If you admire pillar-sitting you have the earlier example of the
    pillar sitters at the temple of Atagartis in Hierapolis. Read about
    it here in Lucian's 'De Syria Dea' ch 29 "the holy pillar sitters'
    http://www.geocities.com/SoHo/lofts/2938/deasyria1.html#nav

    and here is a scholar from Corpus Christi College,Oxford making the
    connection
    http://ccat.sas.upenn.edu/bmcr/2000/2000-10-07.html#t3

    The study of Middle Easter paganism during the Roman Empire is well
    worth one's trouble. When you look on so-called Islamic flags today
    with their star and crescent, they are the mark of the Middle Eastern
    Goddess: Astarte.

    The ancient Judaeans had the idea of a contract with their god YHWH,
    we all know where that led;-) Ideas may seem superficially similar
    but are different. T

    The problem with Universalist Exclusive religions [note I say
    universalist, genuinely exclusive religions don't want outiders and
    are happy to leave them alone to their fate.]
    is that they force all persons to bend to their 'unique' vision and
    so-called 'truth.' and need to erase all challenges to their 'truth'
    I don't understand why,I really don't care, Many such as I find this
    idea truly silly.
    valeas
    Maior



    ti were christain, i should have only one ideal Simeon Stylites (and
    i don't say that in a
    > bad way)"
    >
    > and the vast majority - the overwhelming majority - of the Early
    Fathers would agree with
    > you; celibate monasticism was (and to some extent, still is) looked
    upon as the ultimate
    > expression of devotion to God. It is balanced to some extent by
    the command "go ye into
    > all the world and preach My gospel to every creature, baptizing
    them in the Name of the
    > Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit."
    >
    > One thing which I believe that Orthodoxy and the Religio have in
    common is the idea that,
    > ultimately, the divine Nature(s) is/are ineffable; we cannot
    possibly truly understand the
    > nature(s) of the God(s), and it is not necessarily the most
    important thing that we do so,
    > but we are bound to obedience to Their will in order to bring peace
    and balance to the
    > world. Who the Gods are is less important than what They do.
    >
    > In the Religio, the divine says, "make this sacrifice on this day
    and do it in such-and-such
    > a manner, and you will have fulfilled a contractual obligation with
    Me and I will probably
    > reward you according to our contract"; the Religio is inextricably
    bound to the very being
    > of the State. In exactly the same way, the Eastern Empire saw the
    emperor as Vice-Gerent
    > of God on earth, the Equal to the Apostles, and the health and well-
    being of the State
    > depended upon the Church (with the emperor at its head) obeying the
    commands of God.
    >
    > Vale!
    >
    > Cato
    >
    Group: Nova-Roma Message: 61008 From: Maior Date: 2009-02-09
    Subject: Re: de Lentulo
    --Maior Metello Covae spd;
    I removed the post late last night to reword it. But it's too late
    so let me say plainly that I believe our concord in Nova Roma is due
    not to some imminent Apocolypse but rather - to our wonderful
    sacerdos Concordiae Gn. Cornelius Lentulus, I admire and respect him
    and Dea Concordia is certainly pleased with him:)
    valete
    Maior

    > Metellus Coruae salutem.
    >
    > > Maior dicit:
    > >
    > > "...I would say all this concord is due to Gn. Cornelius Lentulus
    sacerdos Concordiae. Isn't he effective! Vales"
    > >
    > > Hehe! I couldn't agree more! Yea, Lentulus!
    > >
    > > Paulla Corva
    >
    > Indeed, that Lentulus is a good man. Sometimes the quiet sort (and
    those are
    > the ones to worry about most! :)), but a good man. Quite a fine
    Roman specimen,
    > wouldn't you say?
    >
    Group: Nova-Roma Message: 61009 From: philippe cardon Date: 2009-02-09
    Subject: Re: some OT thoughts was regulus and maioir conversation
    The biblical theology of the covenant and the "do ut des " idea are not in fact the same concept
     
    in regards to ascetism it is something which attracts me and  i feel very uncomfortable at the same time with the concept, i have some problem with it because
    I am a hedonist not totally happy with my way, I feell I lose something but why exactly? I see ascetic men as supermen and i am not one of them
     
    for orthodoxy, some westerners see it as the most "paganized" church, a protestant theologian like harnack around 1900 said it is nothing in common between russian and greek churches and the "simple'" all "ethical" message of jesus in the gospels, contrary to the rather metaphysical and ritualist views of the eastern churches
     
    but the same harnak thought the greek philosphy made considerable dammages to the "simple' message of jesus because greek philosphy distort it in the  Church fathers' times
     
    so all point of view about true christianity is tenable, all doctrines lies in the Bible and if we wantedd to build a "pagan" roman theology all doctrines would be tenable according which philosophy we should use to explain the myths and the rites
     
    but have you seen? romans lost all indigenous  myths, beside historical ones, so we have nothing to interpret ans so no theology to build
     
    varo
     
     
     
     
    ----- Original Message -----
    From: Maior
    Sent: Monday, February 09, 2009 7:37 PM
    Subject: [Nova-Roma] Regulus & Maior Conversation was [ Re: Curious non-member with some questions.]

    Maior Varroni sal;
    If you admire pillar-sitting you have the earlier example of the
    pillar sitters at the temple of Atagartis in Hierapolis. Read about
    it here in Lucian's 'De Syria Dea' ch 29 "the holy pillar sitters'
    http://www.geocitie s.com/SoHo/ lofts/2938/ deasyria1. html#nav

    and here is a scholar from Corpus Christi College,Oxford making the
    connection
    http://ccat. sas.upenn. edu/bmcr/ 2000/2000- 10-07.html# t3

    The study of Middle Easter paganism during the Roman Empire is well
    worth one's trouble. When you look on so-called Islamic flags today
    with their star and crescent, they are the mark of the Middle Eastern
    Goddess: Astarte.

    The ancient Judaeans had the idea of a contract with their god YHWH,
    we all know where that led;-) Ideas may seem superficially similar
    but are different. T

    The problem with Universalist Exclusive religions [note I say
    universalist, genuinely exclusive religions don't want outiders and
    are happy to leave them alone to their fate.]
    is that they force all persons to bend to their 'unique' vision and
    so-called 'truth.' and need to erase all challenges to their 'truth'
    I don't understand why,I really don't care, Many such as I find this
    idea truly silly.
    valeas
    Maior

    ti were christain, i should have only one ideal Simeon Stylites (and
    i don't say that in a
    > bad way)"
    >
    > and the vast majority - the overwhelming majority - of the Early
    Fathers would agree with
    > you; celibate monasticism was (and to some extent, still is) looked
    upon as the ultimate
    > expression of devotion to God. It is balanced to some extent by
    the command "go ye into
    > all the world and preach My gospel to every creature, baptizing
    them in the Name of the
    > Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit."
    >
    > One thing which I believe that Orthodoxy and the Religio have in
    common is the idea that,
    > ultimately, the divine Nature(s) is/are ineffable; we cannot
    possibly truly understand the
    > nature(s) of the God(s), and it is not necessarily the most
    important thing that we do so,
    > but we are bound to obedience to Their will in order to bring peace
    and balance to the
    > world. Who the Gods are is less important than what They do.
    >
    > In the Religio, the divine says, "make this sacrifice on this day
    and do it in such-and-such
    > a manner, and you will have fulfilled a contractual obligation with
    Me and I will probably
    > reward you according to our contract"; the Religio is inextricably
    bound to the very being
    > of the State. In exactly the same way, the Eastern Empire saw the
    emperor as Vice-Gerent
    > of God on earth, the Equal to the Apostles, and the health and well-
    being of the State
    > depended upon the Church (with the emperor at its head) obeying the
    commands of God.
    >
    > Vale!
    >
    > Cato
    >


    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Orange vous informe que cet e-mail a été contrôlé par l'anti-virus mail.
    Aucun virus connu à ce jour par nos services n'a été détecté.


    Group: Nova-Roma Message: 61010 From: QFabiusMaxmi@aol.com Date: 2009-02-09
    Subject: Re: Crusades question and NOT the start of a flame war
    In a message dated 2/8/2009 6:01:16 P.M. Pacific Standard Time, spqr753@... writes:
    I have been wondering for some time what the public view is of the nature of the Crusades.
    I can tell you the historian's view of the Crusades. 
    1. Seljuck Turk advancement 
    2. The Empire fails to contain them
    3. The destruction of the Tagmata at Manzikert
    4.  The Emperor Alexis requests mercenaries from the West to replace his losses.
    5.  The Turks occupy the Holy Land, and mistreat pilgrams.
    6.   Pope Urban II preaches a Crusade to free the Holy Land.
    7.   Because of primogenitor many third and forth son landless Knights take up the cross.
    They will carve new fiefs in the middle East.
     
    After a year of campaigning  in 1099 the Christian Kingdom of Jerusalem is declared.
     
    Q. Fabius Maximus  
     
    .        


    The year's hottest artists on the red carpet at the Grammy Awards. AOL Music takes you there.
    Group: Nova-Roma Message: 61011 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2009-02-09
    Subject: Regulus & Maior Conversation was [ Re: Curious non-member with some
    Cato Cn. Caelio Ahenobarbo sal.

    Salve!

    I guess it depends on whether you are a moral relativist or a moral
    objectivist. The great school of moral objectivism would say that
    certain acts are inherently *understood* to be evil; hence the
    existence of what we call the "golden rule" in pretty much every
    society that has left written records.

    Murder - not killing, but murder - has always had a spot on that very
    special list of activities that were considered taboo for whatever
    reason. If you feel that fast food enterprises are, in fact,
    committing murder by what they are offering for our consumption, then
    yes, they are evil! :)

    Vale,

    Cato



    --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Gnaeus Caelius Ahenobarbus"
    <cn.caelius@...> wrote:
    >
    > Cn. Caelius Ahenobarbus C. Equitio Catoni s.p.d.
    >
    > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Gaius Equitius Cato" <mlcinnyc@>
    > wrote:
    > > The classic response is, of course, Nazi Germany.
    > >What happened in that society was evil,
    > >and no matter how many people either actively supported it or
    > >allowed it to continue by passively accepting it, it is still evil.
    >
    > I call "Godwin's Law" due to the reductio ad Nazium (
    > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Godwin%27s_law ); you lose the argument
    > by default.
    > "Evil" is a value judgment. To you, it was evil; to others, it
    was
    > not. For example, I consider fast food restaurants "evil". Do
    actions
    > have inherent ethical considerations, or are they only actions? Do
    > words have inherent values, or are they just packets of meaning? Ah,
    > philosophy. :-)
    > Oh, why am I dragging out this silliness?
    >
    Group: Nova-Roma Message: 61012 From: fauxrari Date: 2009-02-09
    Subject: Looking for info about Roman weddings
    Salve, friends!

    I had a few questions that I was hoping someone could help me answer
    about Roman weddings. My friend and I have decided to get 'married' as
    a way of incorporating a new educational experiences into one of our re-
    enactment group's events this coming July. We portray the Roman
    soldiers, auxiliaries and civilians around the city of Eburacum in the
    province of Britannia around the years AD 122-138 during the reign of
    Hadrian.

    I have have a decent amount of information about what I (the bride)
    should wear, but not the groom. I am also in desperate need of any
    information about rituals, incantations, prayers, etc. that might have
    been used during a wedding ceremony or simply any pertinent information.

    I appreciate any help that anyone can offer. I would also really
    appreciate whatever references or citations you might have as I am
    expected to write a college-level research paper to fulfill our group's
    educational goals. Luckily this and the sewing will be the easiest part
    as I have a BA in English.

    Vale friends with many thanks,

    L. Antonia Auriga
    Group: Nova-Roma Message: 61013 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2009-02-09
    Subject: Re: some OT thoughts was regulus and maioir conversation
    Cato Varroni sal.

    Your view regarding the idea that "doctrines lies in the bible" is a
    quite Protestant one, and had no real place in the understanding of
    the Church from the time it was founded until the time of Luther's
    break with the Roman Church. The Orthodox teach that the book was
    written *for us*, we are not slaves to it. While it cannot lead to
    error, it contains just a part of the machinery of salvation and
    grace.

    The Early Church followed the practices of the Apostles themselves
    and the writings of the Fathers as well as the canon of the New
    Testament as a means of understanding the fullness of the Faith,
    revealed to the Church by the Paraclete. These all together
    constitute what we understand to be Holy Tradition.


    Votre idée que "se trouve toutes les doctrines de la Bible" est un
    idée très protestante, et n'avait pas de véritable place dans la
    compréhension de l'Eglise à partir du moment où elle a été fondée à
    l'époque de Luther de rompre avec l'Eglise Catholique Romaine. Les
    orthodoxes enseignent que le livre a été écrit *pour nous*, nous ne
    sommes pas esclaves de celui-ci. Si elle ne peut pas induire en
    erreur, il contient une partie de la machine de salut et de grâce.

    L'Eglise a suivi les pratiques des Apôtres eux-mêmes et les écrits
    des Pères de l'Eglise, ainsi que le canon du Nouveau Testament comme
    un moyen de comprendre la plénitude de la foi, a révélé à l'Église
    par le Paraclet. Ces toutes ensemble, constituent ce que nous
    comprenons à Sainte Tradition.

    Vale,

    Cato
    Group: Nova-Roma Message: 61014 From: philippe cardon Date: 2009-02-09
    Subject: Re: some OT thoughts was regulus and maioir conversation
    sorry you have misunderstood me because I explained myself wrong
    i meant: take whatever christian doctrine you want, from whatever church you think abot and with the bible i can justify this doctrine, and say: oh yes it is the true christian doctrine
     
    so i did' mean the absolute autorithy of the Bible upon the churches (because the churches created the Bible) but the absolute authority of the churches upon the Bible because the bible serves whatever direction one church will.
    and  why so? because the Bible is not a doctrinal book but a mythical one, very impotant one, i must not be explained by philosphy but listened by spirituals persons
     
    it is like the Greek myths all philosphical schools claimed to find its own doctrine in Homer but they used homer they didn't listen to im
     
    Varo
    ----- Original Message -----
    Sent: Monday, February 09, 2009 10:57 PM
    Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: some OT thoughts was regulus and maioir conversation

    Cato Varroni sal.

    Your view regarding the idea that "doctrines lies in the bible" is a
    quite Protestant one, and had no real place in the understanding of
    the Church from the time it was founded until the time of Luther's
    break with the Roman Church. The Orthodox teach that the book was
    written *for us*, we are not slaves to it. While it cannot lead to
    error, it contains just a part of the machinery of salvation and
    grace.

    The Early Church followed the practices of the Apostles themselves
    and the writings of the Fathers as well as the canon of the New
    Testament as a means of understanding the fullness of the Faith,
    revealed to the Church by the Paraclete. These all together
    constitute what we understand to be Holy Tradition.

    Votre idée que "se trouve toutes les doctrines de la Bible" est un
    idée très protestante, et n'avait pas de véritable place dans la
    compréhension de l'Eglise à partir du moment où elle a été fondée à
    l'époque de Luther de rompre avec l'Eglise Catholique Romaine. Les
    orthodoxes enseignent que le livre a été écrit *pour nous*, nous ne
    sommes pas esclaves de celui-ci. Si elle ne peut pas induire en
    erreur, il contient une partie de la machine de salut et de grâce.

    L'Eglise a suivi les pratiques des Apôtres eux-mêmes et les écrits
    des Pères de l'Eglise, ainsi que le canon du Nouveau Testament comme
    un moyen de comprendre la plénitude de la foi, a révélé à l'Église
    par le Paraclet. Ces toutes ensemble, constituent ce que nous
    comprenons à Sainte Tradition.

    Vale,

    Cato


    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Orange vous informe que cet e-mail a été contrôlé par l'anti-virus mail.
    Aucun virus connu à ce jour par nos services n'a été détecté.


    Group: Nova-Roma Message: 61015 From: QFabiusMaxmi@aol.com Date: 2009-02-09
    Subject: Re: Regulus & Maior Conversation was [ Re: Curious non-member wit...
    >The classic response is, of course, Nazi Germany. What happened in
    that >society was evil,
    >and no matter how many people either actively supported it or
    allowed it to >continue by
    >passively accepting it, it is still evil.
    You know what Cato?  I get really tired of you trying to say what's evil and what's not.
     
    Had Germany won the war, the ethnic cleansing phase would have looked a lot different then
    it looks today.   When the Crusaders slaughtered the 20,000 Muslims and 5,000 Jews of Jerusalem in 1099, the Pope forgave them publicly.  Why?  Because it was necessary.  They were told what would happen if they did not surrender to the besiegers, and once the city was stormed and taken the Crusaders made good on their threat.   
     
    Exposure was a fact of life in the ancient world.  It wasn't evil, it wasn't good, it was necessary.
    The Hebrews and the Egyptians did not practice it, because the Egyptians needed all the population
    they could get, as did the Hebrews.
     
    Using hindsight to superimpose a moral structure on 21st century Romans is un workable.  Depending on where they were born, and how they were raised, colors the view a man takes of their fellow man.  You may deplore it, but there it is.
     
    Q. Fabius Maximus     
         


    The year's hottest artists on the red carpet at the Grammy Awards. AOL Music takes you there.
    Group: Nova-Roma Message: 61016 From: Maior Date: 2009-02-09
    Subject: Re: some OT thoughts was regulus and maioir conversation
    Salve Varro;
    yes, I know and you know but Cato doesn't understand the
    differences between religio or his cult.

    I see myself as somewhat of an Epicurean-Cyrenaic too. But I
    understand your admiration of the ascetic superman as I did this in
    2005. I trained in a very old Japanese Buddhist traditon (Tendai) as
    a priestess. For 10 days we rose at 3:30 am poured cold water over
    ourselves, meditated did a thousand full prostrations a day, work, a
    4O kilometer hike, sleep at 9 pm. And yes I did feel like a superman.

    I'm glad I did it as I know how strong I am...but it doesn't make
    you spiritual or superior. I used to enjoy looking at the handsome
    male priests in their swimsuits during water purification;-)and
    another priestess I knew dreamt of food all day...

    Romans were different than Greeks, they weren't interested in
    theology really, knowledge of such deities such as Pales, faded
    because they didn't really care. They were interested and developed
    the complex pontifical and augural law. This really shows the
    difference in their mindsets.

    There is an epicurean viewpoint of the religio that I subscribe to
    and existed, a pythagorean one: theurgy. Emperor Julian had a very
    Greek view of the Religio.
    optime vale
    Maior



    > The biblical theology of the covenant and the "do ut des " idea are
    not in fact the same concept
    >
    > in regards to ascetism it is something which attracts me and i
    feel very uncomfortable at the same time with the concept, i have
    some problem with it because
    > I am a hedonist not totally happy with my way, I feell I lose
    something but why exactly? I see ascetic men as supermen and i am not
    one of them
    >
    > for orthodoxy, some westerners see it as the most "paganized"
    church, a protestant theologian like harnack around 1900 said it is
    nothing in common between russian and greek churches and the
    "simple'" all "ethical" message of jesus in the gospels, contrary to
    the rather metaphysical and ritualist views of the eastern churches
    >
    > but the same harnak thought the greek philosphy made considerable
    dammages to the "simple' message of jesus because greek philosphy
    distort it in the Church fathers' times
    >
    > so all point of view about true christianity is tenable, all
    doctrines lies in the Bible and if we wantedd to build a "pagan"
    roman theology all doctrines would be tenable according which
    philosophy we should use to explain the myths and the rites
    >
    > but have you seen? romans lost all indigenous myths, beside
    historical ones, so we have nothing to interpret ans so no theology
    to build
    >
    > varo
    >
    >
    >
    >
    > ----- Original Message -----
    > From: Maior
    > To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
    > Sent: Monday, February 09, 2009 7:37 PM
    > Subject: [Nova-Roma] Regulus & Maior Conversation was [ Re:
    Curious non-member with some questions.]
    >
    >
    > Maior Varroni sal;
    > If you admire pillar-sitting you have the earlier example of the
    > pillar sitters at the temple of Atagartis in Hierapolis. Read
    about
    > it here in Lucian's 'De Syria Dea' ch 29 "the holy pillar sitters'
    > http://www.geocities.com/SoHo/lofts/2938/deasyria1.html#nav
    >
    > and here is a scholar from Corpus Christi College,Oxford making
    the
    > connection
    > http://ccat.sas.upenn.edu/bmcr/2000/2000-10-07.html#t3
    >
    > The study of Middle Easter paganism during the Roman Empire is
    well
    > worth one's trouble. When you look on so-called Islamic flags
    today
    > with their star and crescent, they are the mark of the Middle
    Eastern
    > Goddess: Astarte.
    >
    > The ancient Judaeans had the idea of a contract with their god
    YHWH,
    > we all know where that led;-) Ideas may seem superficially
    similar
    > but are different. T
    >
    > The problem with Universalist Exclusive religions [note I say
    > universalist, genuinely exclusive religions don't want outiders
    and
    > are happy to leave them alone to their fate.]
    > is that they force all persons to bend to their 'unique' vision
    and
    > so-called 'truth.' and need to erase all challenges to their
    'truth'
    > I don't understand why,I really don't care, Many such as I find
    this
    > idea truly silly.
    > valeas
    > Maior
    >
    > ti were christain, i should have only one ideal Simeon Stylites
    (and
    > i don't say that in a
    > > bad way)"
    > >
    > > and the vast majority - the overwhelming majority - of the
    Early
    > Fathers would agree with
    > > you; celibate monasticism was (and to some extent, still is)
    looked
    > upon as the ultimate
    > > expression of devotion to God. It is balanced to some extent by
    > the command "go ye into
    > > all the world and preach My gospel to every creature, baptizing
    > them in the Name of the
    > > Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit."
    > >
    > > One thing which I believe that Orthodoxy and the Religio have
    in
    > common is the idea that,
    > > ultimately, the divine Nature(s) is/are ineffable; we cannot
    > possibly truly understand the
    > > nature(s) of the God(s), and it is not necessarily the most
    > important thing that we do so,
    > > but we are bound to obedience to Their will in order to bring
    peace
    > and balance to the
    > > world. Who the Gods are is less important than what They do.
    > >
    > > In the Religio, the divine says, "make this sacrifice on this
    day
    > and do it in such-and-such
    > > a manner, and you will have fulfilled a contractual obligation
    with
    > Me and I will probably
    > > reward you according to our contract"; the Religio is
    inextricably
    > bound to the very being
    > > of the State. In exactly the same way, the Eastern Empire saw
    the
    > emperor as Vice-Gerent
    > > of God on earth, the Equal to the Apostles, and the health and
    well-
    > being of the State
    > > depended upon the Church (with the emperor at its head) obeying
    the
    > commands of God.
    > >
    > > Vale!
    > >
    > > Cato
    > >
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    > Orange vous informe que cet e-mail a été contrôlé par l'anti-
    virus mail.
    > Aucun virus connu à ce jour par nos services n'a été détecté.
    >
    Group: Nova-Roma Message: 61017 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2009-02-09
    Subject: Regulus & Maior Conversation was [ Re: Curious non-member wit...
    Cato Q. Fabio Maximo sal.

    Salve.

    Fabius Maximus, if you can find a way to make the wholesale
    destruction of 13 million people - your "ethnic cleansing phase", a
    term the Nazis themselves might have found eminently reasonable -
    morally acceptable, more power to you. Fortunately, we do *not* live
    in a world in which Nazi Germany was victorious, and the morality of
    murder has not changed so much since the Second World War that Nazi
    ideology can be afforded the separation applied to an ancient culture.

    Now, in the framework of the mentality of war at the time of the
    Crusades, you offered surrender, and if it was accepted you usually -
    though not always - allowed the inhabitants of a city to take their
    stuff and leave. If they did not surrender, it was open season on
    anyone left in the city. Traditionally three days was the period of
    time a victorious army was allowed to do whatever they wanted. So
    no, it is not a surprise that it happened.

    You do realize of course that the Muslims were not just hanging
    around eatig figs and dates just happening accidentally to peacefully
    conquer cities in the 400 years that led up to the Crusades, right?
    That they didn't sweep across the Middle East and North Africa until
    they had crossed the Pyrenees by smiling and handing out Qu'rans?
    There is such an obsession with making sure everyone knows exactly
    how horrifying the Christians acted that it seems only natural to
    pretend that the Muslims were quiet, peaceful, loving, nurturing and
    gentle in this scenario, creating an empire with hugs and bunny
    slippers.

    Vale,

    Cato
    Group: Nova-Roma Message: 61018 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2009-02-09
    Subject: Re: some OT thoughts was regulus and maioir conversation
    Cato Varroni Maiorisque SPD

    Salvete.

    Perhaps one of you could explain how the Religio is so different from
    Orthodoxy with regards to the reliance on orthopraxy I described,
    rather than Maior simply saying that it is not "understood"? I
    pointed out ways in which they *might* be similar; I made it very
    clear that I am not talking about the beliefs themselves, but the
    expression of those beliefs and the expected outcome.

    Valete,

    Cato
    Group: Nova-Roma Message: 61019 From: Titus Annaeus Regulus Date: 2009-02-09
    Subject: Re: Crusades question and NOT the start of a flame war
    Salve Paulinus,
     
    Well, before I begin, be of the understanding that I represent only a Christian viewpoint on the Crusades, my own, I have no idea how this would fall with others and I would like to think I'm rather impartial and that my personal religion doesn't cloud my ability to view the events that led up to, and continued, the Crusades.
     
    I don't think there can be any question that the Church called for the Crusades. The Muslim rulers of the Levant at the time were much more tolerant of fellow "People of the Book" than the Roman Church of the time, for the most part being reasonably accommodating to Christian pilgrims and residents as well as those of Jewish descent. There was not really any plausible cause to declare war after the Muslims having been occupying Jerusalem for centuries. The real motive behind the First Crusade was the Byzantine Emperor's request for aid to fight the 'infidel' Turks that had been encroaching on Byzantine territory for years. Considering the Church had recently supported the Iberian kingdoms in the Reconquista of the Iberian peninsula from Muslims, this was essentially the same thing. As I said to Maior earlier, the Church was a highly political body in addition to its spiritual purpose. The more people that recognized the spiritual suzerainty of the Pope, the more his secular influence grew. Thus the Pope was presented with an opportunity to hopefully bring the errant (in his view) Orthodox Church back into the fold, while at the same time conquering swathes of new territory that was completely beyond his sphere of influence.
     
    The cause was most important because of the symbolic importance of Jerusalem to Christians, but there were other Crusades as well which have absolutely no purpose other than spreading Christian influence. Look at the Teutonic Knights in Northern Europe and their persecution of Lithuanian pagans (and Orthodox Novgorod for that matter). Even before that Holy Roman Emperor Charlemagne with his forced conversion of the pagan Saxons. The common theme between all of these is the increased influence that accrues to the Church. The only reason that 'the Crusades' (I.e. The Crusades in the Levant) were (and are) more popular is that for the common soldier/history enthusiast, the idea of freeing Jerusalem from 'heathen devils' or something equally derogatory was much more glamorous than slaying Lithuanian peasants in a Northern European forest.
     
    Now it could be (and was) argued that this spreading of Christianity was for the good of the non-believers as well since Christianity is the only true religion but considering the wanton way the Crusaders would often kill non-Christians (or even non-Roman Christians) in great numbers, I think that idea is pretty well disproved.
     
    For those of you who are puzzled that I seem to be portraying the Church as a 'bad' organization, please don't misunderstand me. The Church had a vision of good things for the common people, but this was more the domain of the priest or bishop; the Pope did not hold Mass or Confession for everyone obviously. For the Pope, He had to look at the well-being of all of (Roman) Christianity. While it may seem highly unlikely today after a relatively short separation from Western European colonialism of much of the world, Christian Europe was by no means secure at the time. The other groups that surrounded this pocket of (nominally) friendly states were very powerful and had an interest in spreading their influence as well. On a macro-view, uniting Orthodox and Catholic policies to form one agenda would have been a great coup, as well as striking a blow at the Muslim states that dominated North Africa and the Middle and Near East. That's what I see in the Crusades. A chance to rally the common people, and a chance to unite Christianity to face its competitor religions and maybe add new lands to Christendom, but not of a real spiritual importance. Augustine of Hippo wrote centuries before on the "City of God" that was far more important than any temporal city. At the time he was trying to comfort Christians on the impending destruction of the "City of Man" (I.e. Rome) but his writing clearing establish that no physical location is of real importance in Roman Christian tradition.
     
    What about yourself Paulinus? Would love to hear some other views on the subject.
     
    Vale,
    Regulus

    From: Gallagher
    Sent: Sunday, February 08, 2009 10:30 PM
    Subject: [Nova-Roma] Crusades question and NOT the start of a flame war

    Salve Regulus who said in part
     
    "but instigated them (I.e. the Crusades). "
     
    I have been wondering for some time what the public view is of the nature of the Crusades.
    Could you please inform me what you believe them to have been. This is not an invitation
    for a flame war and before anyone yells OT , we are Romans of the 28th century and are adult
    enough to talk about anything that has occurred since  one  A.U C.
     
    Vale
     
    Tiberius Galerius Paulinus

     



    To: Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com
    From: t.annaevsregvlvs@ ymail.com
    Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2009 14:53:54 -0330
    Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Bona Dea and Roman culture [Regulus & Maior Conversation]


    Salve Maior,
     
    I agree it was not a theocracy. I am merely saying that power is power and that in different eras, there were different forms of power, but it was always closely controlled by the influential people of the time. If one is even passingly acquainted with Mediaeval history, the number of 'nullifications' of marriages that were awarded to influential persons is quite surprising even while 'divorce' remained immoral for the common people (as a case in point of convenience vs. conviction). Roman Catholicism is my faith, but I am aware that the Church has been a highly political body throughout its history. The discussion now is purely academic, so by no means feel that I may become offended.
     
    Your point on the sanctity of the Bona Dea cult is what caused me to comment earlier that introducing the suppression of abortion as part of religion was a very shrewd maneuver in later ages. Religion has always been a very powerful moral force and can often defy reasoned argument. The main difference being (imo) that in the Republican era, there were many deities and so it would be difficult to affect the moral landscape of the entire culture. In later eras, there was only one large religious institution that dominated the entire Western World. If a Pope decided to ban or suppress a certain practice, it was so. Thus it was that powerful men of the time could approach the Church and request these measures be implemented. It is basically the exact same situation as Augustus rewarding fertile matrons, except for the different time and circumstances. But, as I have said earlier, power is power, and the pragmatism of rulers has been a common theme throughout Western history.
     
    I would have to say the Church has been thoroughly influenced by secular concerns throughout its existence. Even the briefest acquaintance with Jesus and His teachings in the Bible would illustrate a complete rejection of violence towards anyone. However the Church has not only condoned war, but instigated them (I.e. the Crusades). You will find that the demands of the present often have had massive influence on the Church' position on its tenets. Thus while I cannot speak with certainty on why a Pope would ban abortion, considering the previous Church's acceptance of the practice, I would say it is most probable that it was through the influence of current events more so than a deep conviction that caused it to be implemented.
     
    The differences of era and religion do play a part, especially in the actors present, but I like to see the commonalities between Roman culture and modern culture (since that is what we are all about) rather than the differences. Very interesting topic indeed, excellent conversation.
     
    Vale,
    Regulus

    From: Maior
    Sent: Sunday, February 08, 2009 1:02 AM
    Subject: [Nova-Roma] Bona Dea and Roman culture [Regulus & Maior Conversation]

    Salve Regule;
    Republican Rome wasn't a secular society like France nor was it a
    theocracy. It's true senators were pontifexes and augurs but old
    cults could not be changed, Romans had a deep reverence for ancient
    practice. So not even the Senate would not, could not interfere with
    the priestesses of Bona Dea.
    In your discussion of your family cultus, I'm at a total cultural
    loss and an intellectual one. I do know until fairly recently Western
    culture equated sexuality with evil, forbid birth control and
    abortion as well as divorce. If it was that calculated it was deeply
    shrewd.
    It only came around 1998 to Ireland! perhaps Livia Plauta or Albucius
    or Dexter will be able to further the conversation; I've retitled it
    to invite further discussion. Fascinating topic.
    optime vale
    Maior

    > Salve Maior,
    >
    > Haha, well it started
    out as depicting the 'huge difference between
    Judaeo-Christian and Republican Roman' views on abortion (regardless
    of what you are saying now, because I agree it is an interesting
    tidbit of Roman culture) and the RC church represents the majority of
    Judaeo-Christians (in a numerical sense) so I hardly think we can
    have a decent discussion if you refuse to consider the majority of
    the people you made the comment about. My point was simply that it is
    not a matter of religious necessity for the Christian world either,
    but of princes and bishops having the same desire as Roman
    aristocracy; more hands to hold plows and swords. The fact that they
    managed to get it introduced as part of religion (which is much
    harder to change than rational decisions) makes it all the more
    effective, but doesn't represent anything other than the exact same
    motives as Roman aristocrats and different circumstances. Besides, as
    I'm constantly told, the Roman State and Religion were inextricably
    intertwined and so if you say the State controlled it, then I assume
    the Religio would have had much influence as well.
    >
    > Regulus
    >
    >
    > From:
    Maior
    > Sent: Saturday, February 07, 2009 6:47 PM
    > To:
    href="mailto:Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com">Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com
    > Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Curious non-member with some
    questions.
    >
    >
    > Regule;
    > frankly I don't care that
    the RC church was/is against birth
    > control or was for/against abortion.
    That's a private cultus with no
    > interest to me.
    > What I'm saying
    is that this is a good example of Roman culture,
    > where political
    conservatives might complain that Roman women were
    not
    > bearing
    enough chiidren, What could they do? very little, Except
    > Augustus who
    rewarded matrons who had 3 children, you see it's the
    > state who is
    involved in this issue in Rome.
    > optime vale
    > Maior
    >
    > >
    > > Salve Maior,
    > >
    > > You must be
    looking at a different church than I. =) My mother's
    > family is
    traditional Irish Catholic. I can think of few families in
    > my
    grandparents' generation of less than 10 children (my grandmother
    > had 15
    siblings), and my mother had 6 siblings. I can't speak to
    > motives, but I
    can't argue with the results. It is no coincidence
    that
    > there are
    over 1,000,000,000 Catholics. Considering the early Church
    > had no laws
    against abortion (in fact St. Augustine of Hippo Regius
    > wrote that
    abortion is not a murder since a fetus would have no
    soul),
    > I can
    see no reason for later Church leaders to add it (in the face
    of
    >
    previous precedent) except for the obvious benefits of increased
    >
    manpower. Besides, when you consider that the Church generally
    frowns
    > upon sexual activity, it becomes even more apparent that this
    frequent
    > sanctimonious shagging belief was more a matter of
    convenience than
    > conviction. I will also say that the Church has
    historically
    provided
    > support for the orphans that this sort of
    practice inevitably
    creates,
    > so hats off for supporting their
    practice, but I do not think that
    the
    > anti-abortion (pro-life?)
    movement is anything intrinsically
    > Judaeo-Christian. Just to keep
    pumping out missionaries, priests,
    > nuns, monks and crusades one needs a
    large pool of manpower.
    > >
    > > Vale,
    > >
    Regulus
    > >
    > >
    > > From: Maior
    > > Sent:
    Saturday, February 07, 2009 4:54 PM
    > > To:
    href="mailto:Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com">Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com
    > > Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Curious non-member with some
    questions.
    > >
    > >
    > > Salve Regule;
    > >
    you're not asking why Roman conservatives didn't like it:) They
    > >
    wanted more Roman boys! A very different attitude than today And
    > >
    that's the big point I'm tying to make about Republican culture.
    > >
    > > great discussion to have,
    > > valeas Maior
    > >
    > > >
    > > > Salve Maior,
    > > >
    > > > If conservative Romans railed against it then, and
    conservatives
    > > rail against it now, I don't see why you would make
    it into a
    > > religious matter. Perhaps it has more to do with
    conservatives
    than
    > > religion? =)
    > > >
    > > > I'm sure if you asked a Roman Catholic priest he wouldn't be
    too
    > > smitten with the idea of abortion of course, but I don't think
    anyone
    > > would accuse the Catholic church of being overly
    progressive.
    Pretty
    > > clear parallels could be drawn between the
    masses that choose to
    use
    > > the service, and a conservative
    portion of the population that
    > > disagrees with it both then and now.
    I know here in Canada most
    people
    > > are at least nominally
    Christian, and yet our public health-care
    > > system permits abortions
    without embracing Republican values.
    > > >
    > > >
    Vale,
    > > > Titus Annaeus Regulus
    > > >
    > > >
    > > > From: Maior
    > > > Sent: Saturday, February
    07, 2009 4:05 PM
    > > > To:
    href="mailto:Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com">Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com
    > > > Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Curious non-member with some
    questions.
    > > >
    > > >
    > > > Maior Ricardo
    quiritibus spd:
    > > > this discussion has inspired me to want Vox
    Romana to do a piece
    > > > on Bona Dea and her temple in
    Rome.
    > > > The precincts of this ancient goddess' temple were only
    open to
    > > > women and Bona Dea's priestesses operated a kind of
    pharmacy
    where
    > > > women could obtain abortificants.
    > > >
    > > > I shocked, really freaked out a lot of people on a
    latin list
    with
    > > > this knowledge that a common culture
    existed where abortion was
    just
    > > > fine and pretty easily
    obtainable (though conservative Romans
    would
    > > > rail against
    it)
    > > >
    > > > So here is a good example of a huge
    cultural difference between
    > > > Republican polytheistic Rome and
    moderns with their Judae-
    Christian
    > > > backgrounds. Of course
    as Nova Roma we follow Republican Rome!
    > > > optime vale
    > > > M. Hortensia Maior
    > > > Flaminica Carmentalis
    > > > Producer Vox Romana podcast
    > > >
    > > > >
    > > > > SaIve Ricarde;
    > > > > I'm M.
    Hortensia Maior producer of Vox Romana podcast,
    actually
    > > > > Saturninus wrote to me not too long ago about the next
    podcast,
    >
    but I
    > > > > was super busy. If you are interested please write
    to me. I
    > would like
    > > > > to see another one go
    out.
    > > > >
    > > > > As for just 2 people, I live
    in Chapel Hill, NC near Duke
    with 2 big
    > > > > classics dept
    and I was the only Nova Roman here. But I met
    new
    > civis
    > > > > M. Aelia Connonia and then this last summer Q. Caelia Laeta
    who
    > > > > joined. Yes we're two but now we meet and study
    and try to
    speak
    > Latin
    > > > > together, discuss NR
    and we're thinking of celebrating maybe
    the
    > > > > Floralia
    and having a big party making Roman food and putting
    up a
    > > > > poster at these departments. ..So you see you can recruit.
    > > > >
    > > > > Nova Roma is a culture its not the SCA at
    all.There is no
    fantasy in
    > > > > what we're doing..
    > > > > If you ignore politics,religio, etc you're missing out on
    being
    > > > > fully Roman on interacting as a 21st century
    Roman. We are not
    > RPG we
    > > > > re the rebirth the
    revival of Roman culture, Roman values in
    the
    > 21st
    > > > > century. It's a wholistic experience.
    > > > > I hoped I've
    cleared things up for you. Do write, epistulum
    mihi
    > > >
    scrivas
    > > > > valeas
    > > > > Maior
    > > > >
    > > > >
    > > > > In
    href="mailto:Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com">Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com, Rich <wielgosz@> wrote:
    > > > > >
    > > > > >
    On Sat, 2009-02-07 at 00:57 -0500, A. Tullia Scholastica
    wrote:
    > > > > >
    > > > > > > I live east of Syracuse NY.
    That's the biggest population
    > > > > > > center
    > > > > > > nearest to me.
    > > > > > >
    > > > > > > Scholastica: and there may be some citizens
    around
    > > > there,
    > > > > > > too, though NYC
    is a better bet. As earlier, Iâ?Tm here
    > > > too,
    > > > > > > not ALL that far away.
    > > > > >
    > > > > > Absolutely. But two people do not exactly make for the kind
    of
    > > > social
    > > > > > event I was
    imagining. :-)
    > > > > >
    > > > > > > I
    have communicated with a few people off list, actually.
    I
    > > > > > > produce a
    > > > > > > podcast and thought I
    might like to get involved with a
    > > > > > > podcast
    produced
    > > > > > > by Nova Romans. That collaboration
    hasn't happened yet.
    > > > > > >
    > > > > > > Scholastica: Nor is it likely. The producer is in grad
    > > > > > > school, and the technical person is busy with two
    little
    > > > > > > preschool kids and a lot of other
    things, including a
    broken
    > > > > > > server for the
    Academia Thules, which has been our
    > > > educational
    > > > > > > arm, so to speak, though it is technically unrelated to
    NR.
    > > > > > > There are other issues there as well.
    > > > > >
    > > > > > Well, I'm too busy
    with my podcast to get involved in the
    > production
    > > > > > of another at this time, anyway. Although an OFFICIAL Nova
    Roma
    > > > podcast
    > > > > > sounds like a great way to
    increase membership.
    > > > > >
    > > > > >
    Regards,
    > > > > > Rich...
    > > > > >
    > > > >
    > > >
    > >
    >



    Group: Nova-Roma Message: 61020 From: Titus Annaeus Regulus Date: 2009-02-09
    Subject: Re: Regulus & Maior Conversation was [ Re: Curious non-member with s
    Salve Regule,
    Regulus: Salve Livia,
    just some quick comments.

    >
    > To say that Christianity displaced Roman culture seems erroneous to
    me and I prefer to see an evolution of two traditions towards one
    that was acceptable to the common people who were Romans. The early
    church was spread with words and deeds and so the church needed to
    make itself as attractive as possible to gain converts.

    LLP: You forget that Christianity never spread to a relevant
    percentage of the population before it was imposed by law. It was by
    no means acceptable to Romans in general.
    There was no such thing as an evolution of two traditions towards
    one. There was a religion that was spread with violence and edicts,
    but later realized that even these means would never be enough, so
    tried to assimilate as many aspects of the previous tradition as it
    could.
     
    Regulus: I think here you give early Christians far too much credit. If, as you say, Christians were a small minority of the population, and most Romans were very much against Christianity, how exactly did Christianity manage to become the state religion? The emperors made it so, not Christians themselves. In these early times, the Church was not even a truly unified organization, so common goals would have been difficult in the extreme. So, in my mind, the emperor must have had good reason to make it so. Since the Roman elite were famously pagan even in later times, I would discount personal conviction. Thus being popular amongst the masses must be the reason. Which means a significant portion of the population must actually be Christian. Unless you have another theory? I am always open to other ideas. =)

    Being seen as foreign and alien would hardly have helped.

    LLP: No, it didn't help. Making it a compulsory State religion did.
     
    Regulus: Once again, you seem to assume that the Christian God actually took control over the Roman state and imposed His will on everyone. This did not happen, Roman Emperors made the decrees, not Christian bishops.

    In fact, using your example of the subjugation of women, I recall
    that there were female equivalents of all religious positions
    (priests, deacons, etc) in the early eastern church and that it was
    the later, Roman-influenced church that was male-only, more in line
    with patriarchal Roman society. Very interesting point of view on
    this Cato, I have found it highly enlightening.

    LLP: This was, in fact one point of attraction of Christianity for
    women, so was the possibility of not having to marry and have
    children.
     
    Regulus: It was definitely one of the few avenues open to women who were not interested in the typical home-maker role.

    Optime vale,
    Livia
     
    Optime Vale,
    Regulus

    Sent: Sunday, February 08, 2009 10:35 PM
    Subject: [Nova-Roma] Regulus & Maior Conversation was [ Re: Curious non-member with some questions.]

    Salve Regule,
    just some quick comments.

    >
    > To say that
    Christianity displaced Roman culture seems erroneous to
    me and I prefer to see an evolution of two traditions towards one
    that was acceptable to the common people who were Romans. The early
    church was spread with words and deeds and so the church needed to
    make itself as attractive as possible to gain converts.

    LLP: You forget that Christianity never spread to a relevant
    percentage of the population before it was imposed by law. It was by
    no means acceptable to Romans in general.
    There was no such thing as an evolution of two traditions towards
    one. There was a religion that was spread with violence and edicts,
    but later realized that even these means would never be enough, so
    tried to assimilate as many aspects of the previous tradition as it
    could.

    Being seen as foreign and alien would hardly have helped.

    LLP: No, it didn't help. Making it a compulsory State religion did.

    In fact, using your example of the subjugation of women, I recall
    that there were female equivalents of all religious positions
    (priests, deacons, etc) in the early eastern church and that it was
    the later, Roman-influenced church that was male-only, more in line
    with patriarchal Roman society. Very interesting point of view on
    this Cato, I have found it highly enlightening.

    LLP: This was, in fact one point of attraction of Christianity for
    women, so was the possibility of not having to marry and have
    children.

    Optime vale,
    Livia

    Group: Nova-Roma Message: 61021 From: Titus Annaeus Regulus Date: 2009-02-09
    Subject: Re: Crusades question and NOT the start of a flame war
    lol Topical as always Marcella. I must admit I got a good laugh. =)
     
    Is this WoW? It seems pretty complex for a fantasy universe.
     
    Vale,
    Regulus

    Sent: Sunday, February 08, 2009 10:50 PM
    Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Crusades question and NOT the start of a flame war

    Well basically two years had passed since the founding of Durotar, the Horde and Alliance start fighting each other more than ever despite an armistice, specifically in Warsong Gulch, Arathi Basin, Alterac Valley, etc(the Alliance have an unfair advantage in WSG, imo). So in Blackrock Spire, Nefarian decides to breed a bunch of dragon hybrids, with the help of his sister Onyxia. Meanwhile some Priests decide to summon Hakkar the Soulflayer, a blood god, in the ruins of Zul'Gurub. Also some green dragons run amok, and some huge bug infestation threatened world wide assault.  You've got ghosts in Kharazan, and saboteurs in the Caverns of Time. Not to mention Lord Kazzak decided to open the Dark Portal to Outland. The Orcs loved this cause it brought them back to their ancestral lands. And the Draenei and Blood Elves have decided to join the Alliance and Horde(respectively) in order to fight Illidan.

    oh wait, were we talking about the Burning Crusade?

    Vale
    - Annia Minucia Marcella
    
    http://minucia. ciarin.com


    Gallagher wrote:

    Salve Regulus who said in part
     
    "but instigated them (I.e. the Crusades). "
     
    I have been wondering for some time what the public view is of the nature of the Crusades.
    Could you please inform me what you believe them to have been. This is not an invitation
    for a flame war and before anyone yells OT , we are Romans of the 28th century and are adult
    enough to talk about anything that has occurred since  one  A.U C.
     
    Vale
     
    Tiberius Galerius Paulinus

     



    To: Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com
    From: t.annaevsregvlvs@ ymail.com
    Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2009 14:53:54 -0330
    Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Bona Dea and Roman culture [Regulus & Maior Conversation]


    Salve Maior,
     
    I agree it was not a theocracy. I am merely saying that power is power and that in different eras, there were different forms of power, but it was always closely controlled by the influential people of the time. If one is even passingly acquainted with Mediaeval history, the number of 'nullifications' of marriages that were awarded to influential persons is quite surprising even while 'divorce' remained immoral for the common people (as a case in point of convenience vs. conviction). Roman Catholicism is my faith, but I am aware that the Church has been a highly political body throughout its history. The discussion now is purely academic, so by no means feel that I may become offended.
     
    Your point on the sanctity of the Bona Dea cult is what caused me to comment earlier that introducing the suppression of abortion as part of religion was a very shrewd maneuver in later ages. Religion has always been a very powerful moral force and can often defy reasoned argument. The main difference being (imo) that in the Republican era, there were many deities and so it would be difficult to affect the moral landscape of the entire culture. In later eras, there was only one large religious institution that dominated the entire Western World. If a Pope decided to ban or suppress a certain practice, it was so. Thus it was that powerful men of the time could approach the Church and request these measures be implemented. It is basically the exact same situation as Augustus rewarding fertile matrons, except for the different time and circumstances. But, as I have said earlier, power is power, and the pragmatism of rulers has been a common theme throughout Western history.
     
    I would have to say the Church has been thoroughly influenced by secular concerns throughout its existence. Even the briefest acquaintance with Jesus and His teachings in the Bible would illustrate a complete rejection of violence towards anyone. However the Church has not only condoned war, but instigated them (I.e. the Crusades). You will find that the demands of the present often have had massive influence on the Church' position on its tenets. Thus while I cannot speak with certainty on why a Pope would ban abortion, considering the previous Church's acceptance of the practice, I would say it is most probable that it was through the influence of current events more so than a deep conviction that caused it to be implemented.
     
    The differences of era and religion do play a part, especially in the actors present, but I like to see the commonalities between Roman culture and modern culture (since that is what we are all about) rather than the differences. Very interesting topic indeed, excellent conversation.
     
    Vale,
    Regulus

    From: Maior
    Sent: Sunday, February 08, 2009 1:02 AM
    Subject: [Nova-Roma] Bona Dea and Roman culture [Regulus & Maior Conversation]

    Salve Regule;
    Republican Rome wasn't a secular society like France nor was it a
    theocracy. It's true senators were pontifexes and augurs but old
    cults could not be changed, Romans had a deep reverence for ancient
    practice. So not even the Senate would not, could not interfere with
    the priestesses of Bona Dea.
    In your discussion of your family cultus, I'm at a total cultural
    loss and an intellectual one. I do know until fairly recently Western
    culture equated sexuality with evil, forbid birth control and
    abortion as well as divorce. If it was that calculated it was deeply
    shrewd.
    It only came around 1998 to Ireland! perhaps Livia Plauta or Albucius
    or Dexter will be able to further the conversation; I've retitled it
    to invite further discussion. Fascinating topic.
    optime vale
    Maior

    > Salve Maior,
    >
    > Haha, well it started out as depicting the 'huge difference between
    Judaeo-Christian and Republican Roman' views on abortion (regardless
    of what you are saying now, because I agree it is an interesting
    tidbit of Roman culture) and the RC church represents the majority of
    Judaeo-Christians (in a numerical sense) so I hardly think we can
    have a decent discussion if you refuse to consider the majority of
    the people you made the comment about. My point was simply that it is
    not a matter of religious necessity for the Christian world either,
    but of princes and bishops having the same desire as Roman
    aristocracy; more hands to hold plows and swords. The fact that they
    managed to get it introduced as part of religion (which is much
    harder to change than rational decisions) makes it all the more
    effective, but doesn't represent anything other than the exact same
    motives as Roman aristocrats and different circumstances. Besides, as
    I'm constantly told, the Roman State and Religion were inextricably
    intertwined and so if you say the State controlled it, then I assume
    the Religio would have had much influence as well.
    >
    > Regulus
    >
    >
    > From: Maior
    > Sent: Saturday, February 07, 2009 6:47 PM
    > To: Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com
    > Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Curious non-member with some questions.
    >
    >
    > Regule;
    > frankly I don't care that the RC church was/is against birth
    > control or was for/against abortion. That's a private cultus with no
    > interest to me.
    > What I'm saying is that this is a good example of Roman culture,
    > where political conservatives might complain that Roman women were
    not
    > bearing enough chiidren, What could they do? very little, Except
    > Augustus who rewarded matrons who had 3 children, you see it's the
    > state who is involved in this issue in Rome.
    > optime vale
    > Maior
    >
    > >
    > > Salve Maior,
    > >
    > > You must be looking at a different church than I. =) My mother's
    > family is traditional Irish Catholic. I can think of few families in
    > my grandparents' generation of less than 10 children (my grandmother
    > had 15 siblings), and my mother had 6 siblings. I can't speak to
    > motives, but I can't argue with the results. It is no coincidence
    that
    > there are over 1,000,000,000 Catholics. Considering the early Church
    > had no laws against abortion (in fact St. Augustine of Hippo Regius
    > wrote that abortion is not a murder since a fetus would have no
    soul),
    > I can see no reason for later Church leaders to add it (in the face
    of
    > previous precedent) except for the obvious benefits of increased
    > manpower. Besides, when you consider that the Church generally
    frowns
    > upon sexual activity, it becomes even more apparent that this
    frequent
    > sanctimonious shagging belief was more a matter of convenience than
    > conviction. I will also say that the Church has historically
    provided
    > support for the orphans that this sort of practice inevitably
    creates,
    > so hats off for supporting their practice, but I do not think that
    the
    > anti-abortion (pro-life?) movement is anything intrinsically
    > Judaeo-Christian. Just to keep pumping out missionaries, priests,
    > nuns, monks and crusades one needs a large pool of manpower.
    > >
    > > Vale,
    > > Regulus
    > >
    > >
    > > From: Maior
    > > Sent: Saturday, February 07, 2009 4:54 PM
    > > To: Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com
    > > Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Curious non-member with some questions.
    > >
    > >
    > > Salve Regule;
    > > you're not asking why Roman conservatives didn't like it:) They
    > > wanted more Roman boys! A very different attitude than today And
    > > that's the big point I'm tying to make about Republican culture.
    > >
    > > great discussion to have,
    > > valeas Maior
    > >
    > > >
    > > > Salve Maior,
    > > >
    > > > If conservative Romans railed against it then, and conservatives
    > > rail against it now, I don't see why you would make it into a
    > > religious matter. Perhaps it has more to do with conservatives
    than
    > > religion? =)
    > > >
    > > > I'm sure if you asked a Roman Catholic priest he wouldn't be too
    > > smitten with the idea of abortion of course, but I don't think
    anyone
    > > would accuse the Catholic church of being overly progressive.
    Pretty
    > > clear parallels could be drawn between the masses that choose to
    use
    > > the service, and a conservative portion of the population that
    > > disagrees with it both then and now. I know here in Canada most
    people
    > > are at least nominally Christian, and yet our public health-care
    > > system permits abortions without embracing Republican values.
    > > >
    > > > Vale,
    > > > Titus Annaeus Regulus
    > > >
    > > >
    > > > From: Maior
    > > > Sent: Saturday, February 07, 2009 4:05 PM
    > > > To: Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com
    > > > Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Curious non-member with some questions.
    > > >
    > > >
    > > > Maior Ricardo quiritibus spd:
    > > > this discussion has inspired me to want Vox Romana to do a piece
    > > > on Bona Dea and her temple in Rome.
    > > > The precincts of this ancient goddess' temple were only open to
    > > > women and Bona Dea's priestesses operated a kind of pharmacy
    where
    > > > women could obtain abortificants.
    > > >
    > > > I shocked, really freaked out a lot of people on a latin list
    with
    > > > this knowledge that a common culture existed where abortion was
    just
    > > > fine and pretty easily obtainable (though conservative Romans
    would
    > > > rail against it)
    > > >
    > > > So here is a good example of a huge cultural difference between
    > > > Republican polytheistic Rome and moderns with their Judae-
    Christian
    > > > backgrounds. Of course as Nova Roma we follow Republican Rome!
    > > > optime vale
    > > > M. Hortensia Maior
    > > > Flaminica Carmentalis
    > > > Producer Vox Romana podcast
    > > >
    > > > >
    > > > > SaIve Ricarde;
    > > > > I'm M. Hortensia Maior producer of Vox Romana podcast,
    actually
    > > > > Saturninus wrote to me not too long ago about the next
    podcast,
    > but I
    > > > > was super busy. If you are interested please write to me. I
    > would like
    > > > > to see another one go out.
    > > > >
    > > > > As for just 2 people, I live in Chapel Hill, NC near Duke
    with 2 big
    > > > > classics dept and I was the only Nova Roman here. But I met
    new
    > civis
    > > > > M. Aelia Connonia and then this last summer Q. Caelia Laeta
    who
    > > > > joined. Yes we're two but now we meet and study and try to
    speak
    > Latin
    > > > > together, discuss NR and we're thinking of celebrating maybe
    the
    > > > > Floralia and having a big party making Roman food and putting
    up a
    > > > > poster at these departments. ..So you see you can recruit.
    > > > >
    > > > > Nova Roma is a culture its not the SCA at all.There is no
    fantasy in
    > > > > what we're doing..
    > > > > If you ignore politics,religio, etc you're missing out on
    being
    > > > > fully Roman on interacting as a 21st century Roman. We are not
    > RPG we
    > > > > re the rebirth the revival of Roman culture, Roman values in
    the
    > 21st
    > > > > century. It's a wholistic experience.
    > > > > I hoped I've cleared things up for you. Do write, epistulum
    mihi
    > > > scrivas
    > > > > valeas
    > > > > Maior
    > > > >
    > > > >
    > > > > In Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com, Rich <wielgosz@> wrote:
    > > > > >
    > > > > > On Sat, 2009-02-07 at 00:57 -0500, A. Tullia Scholastica
    wrote:
    > > > > >
    > > > > > > I live east of Syracuse NY. That's the biggest population
    > > > > > > center
    > > > > > > nearest to me.
    > > > > > >
    > > > > > > Scholastica: and there may be some citizens around
    > > > there,
    > > > > > > too, though NYC is a better bet. As earlier, Iâ?Tm here
    > > > too,
    > > > > > > not ALL that far away.
    > > > > >
    > > > > > Absolutely. But two people do not exactly make for the kind
    of
    > > > social
    > > > > > event I was imagining. :-)
    > > > > >
    > > > > > > I have communicated with a few people off list, actually.
    I
    > > > > > > produce a
    > > > > > > podcast and thought I might like to get involved with a
    > > > > > > podcast produced
    > > > > > > by Nova Romans. That collaboration hasn't happened yet.
    > > > > > >
    > > > > > > Scholastica: Nor is it likely. The producer is in grad
    > > > > > > school, and the technical person is busy with two little
    > > > > > > preschool kids and a lot of other things, including a
    broken
    > > > > > > server for the Academia Thules, which has been our
    > > > educational
    > > > > > > arm, so to speak, though it is technically unrelated to
    NR.
    > > > > > > There are other issues there as well.
    > > > > >
    > > > > > Well, I'm too busy with my podcast to get involved in the
    > production
    > > > > > of another at this time, anyway. Although an OFFICIAL Nova
    Roma
    > > > podcast
    > > > > > sounds like a great way to increase membership.
    > > > > >
    > > > > > Regards,
    > > > > > Rich...
    > > > > >
    > > > >
    > > >
    > >
    >