Selected messages in Nova-Roma group. Apl 7-12, 2009.

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62772 From: Titus Annaeus Regulus Date: 2009-04-07
Subject: Re: CALL FOR CANDIDATES
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62773 From: livia_plauta Date: 2009-04-07
Subject: Earth Quake
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62774 From: Gnaeus Iulius Caesar Date: 2009-04-07
Subject: Ludi quiz - research hints and prizes
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62775 From: L Julia Aquila Date: 2009-04-07
Subject: Re: caligula
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62776 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2009-04-07
Subject: Re: caligula
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62777 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2009-04-07
Subject: Re: CALL FOR CANDIDATES
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62778 From: L Julia Aquila Date: 2009-04-07
Subject: Earth Quake
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62779 From: A. Sempronius Regulus Date: 2009-04-07
Subject: Re: Earth Quake
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62780 From: Titus Annaeus Regulus Date: 2009-04-07
Subject: Re: CALL FOR CANDIDATES
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62781 From: L Julia Aquila Date: 2009-04-07
Subject: Re: caligula
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62782 From: L Julia Aquila Date: 2009-04-07
Subject: Earth Quake
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62783 From: enodia2002 Date: 2009-04-07
Subject: Candidacy for Diribitor
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62784 From: pompeia_minucia_tiberia Date: 2009-04-07
Subject: Earth Quake
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62785 From: Maior Date: 2009-04-07
Subject: Earth Quake
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62786 From: L Julia Aquila Date: 2009-04-07
Subject: Earth Quake
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62787 From: pompeia_minucia_tiberia Date: 2009-04-07
Subject: Earth Quake
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62788 From: enodia2002 Date: 2009-04-08
Subject: Earth Quake
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62789 From: Gaius Petronius Dexter Date: 2009-04-08
Subject: Re: caligula
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62790 From: Titus Flavius Aquila Date: 2009-04-08
Subject: AW: [Nova-Roma] Re:Earth Quake
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62791 From: Numero 2 Date: 2009-04-08
Subject: Re: Earth Quake
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62792 From: Titus Flavius Aquila Date: 2009-04-08
Subject: AW: [Nova-Roma] Re:Earth Quake
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62793 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2009-04-08
Subject: Re: caligula
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62794 From: livia_plauta Date: 2009-04-08
Subject: Earth Quake
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62795 From: Titus Flavius Aquila Date: 2009-04-08
Subject: AW: [Nova-Roma] Re:Earth Quake
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62796 From: Ugo Coppola Date: 2009-04-08
Subject: Cancellation of Aedilis Plebis candidacy
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62797 From: pompeia_minucia_tiberia Date: 2009-04-08
Subject: Earth Quake
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62798 From: L Julia Aquila Date: 2009-04-08
Subject: Earth Quake
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62799 From: L Julia Aquila Date: 2009-04-08
Subject: Re: caligula
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62800 From: c.aqvillivs_rota Date: 2009-04-08
Subject: ROMAN PRIEST/SOLDIERS NEEDED
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62801 From: Cn. Cornelius Lentulus Date: 2009-04-08
Subject: Cn. Lentulus' Candidacy for Custos
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62804 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2009-04-08
Subject: a.d. VI Id. Apr.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62805 From: L Julia Aquila Date: 2009-04-08
Subject: Re: ROMAN PRIEST/SOLDIERS NEEDED
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62806 From: Ellen Catalina Date: 2009-04-08
Subject: Re: caligula
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62807 From: Gaius Petronius Dexter Date: 2009-04-08
Subject: Re: caligula
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62808 From: galerius_of_rome Date: 2009-04-08
Subject: Exposing Senate Acts of Illegality!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62809 From: enodia2002 Date: 2009-04-08
Subject: NR Disaster Relief Fund
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62810 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2009-04-08
Subject: Re: NR Disaster Relief Fund
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62811 From: enodia2002 Date: 2009-04-08
Subject: Re: NR Disaster Relief Fund
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62812 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2009-04-09
Subject: Re: NR Disaster Relief Fund
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62813 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2009-04-09
Subject: Re: ROMAN PRIEST/SOLDIERS NEEDED
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62814 From: Titus Flavius Aquila Date: 2009-04-09
Subject: AW: [Nova-Roma] Re: NR Disaster Relief Fund / Emergency fund
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62815 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2009-04-09
Subject: Re: Exposing Senate Acts of Illegality!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62816 From: Lucius Coruncanius Cato Date: 2009-04-09
Subject: Re: AW: [Nova-Roma] Re: NR Disaster Relief Fund / Emergency fund
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62817 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2009-04-09
Subject: a.d. V Id. Apr.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62818 From: vallenporter Date: 2009-04-09
Subject: Re: NR Disaster Relief Fund / Emergency fund
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62819 From: Lucius Coruncanius Cato Date: 2009-04-09
Subject: Re: Exposing Senate Acts of Illegality!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62820 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2009-04-09
Subject: Re: Exposing Senate Acts of Illegality!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62821 From: gaiuspopilliuslaenas Date: 2009-04-09
Subject: Re: Exposing Senate Acts of Illegality!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62822 From: livia_plauta Date: 2009-04-09
Subject: Re: Exposing Senate Acts of Illegality!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62823 From: Gnaeus Iulius Caesar Date: 2009-04-09
Subject: Ludi Megalenses: Certamen Historicum - Day 4 & 5
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62824 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2009-04-09
Subject: Tribune's Report (WAS Re: Exposing SAR)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62825 From: Q. Valerius Poplicola Date: 2009-04-09
Subject: Re: Exposing Senate Acts of Illegality!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62826 From: D. Aemilus Severus Date: 2009-04-09
Subject: Re: Tribune's Report (WAS Re: Exposing SAR)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62827 From: Q. Valerius Poplicola Date: 2009-04-09
Subject: Re: Tribune's Report (WAS Re: Exposing SAR)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62828 From: enodia2002 Date: 2009-04-09
Subject: Re: NR Disaster Relief Fund / Emergency fund
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62829 From: Vedius Date: 2009-04-09
Subject: Re: Exposing Senate Acts of Illegality!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62830 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2009-04-09
Subject: Re: Exposing Senate Acts of Illegality!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62831 From: D. Aemilus Severus Date: 2009-04-09
Subject: Re: Tribune's Report (WAS Re: Exposing SAR)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62832 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2009-04-09
Subject: Tribune's Report (WAS Re: Exposing SAR)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62833 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2009-04-09
Subject: Re: Tribune's Report (WAS Re: Exposing SAR)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62834 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2009-04-09
Subject: Tribune's Report (WAS Re: Exposing SAR)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62835 From: A. Sempronius Regulus Date: 2009-04-09
Subject: Seal/was Tribune's Report/was Exposing SAR
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62836 From: Titus Annaeus Regulus Date: 2009-04-09
Subject: Re: Tribune's Report (WAS Re: Exposing SAR)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62837 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2009-04-09
Subject: Re: Seal/was Tribune's Report/was Exposing SAR
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62838 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2009-04-09
Subject: Re: Seal/was Tribune's Report/was Exposing SAR
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62839 From: pompeia_minucia_tiberia Date: 2009-04-09
Subject: Tribune's Report (WAS Re: Exposing SAR)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62840 From: Steve Moore Date: 2009-04-09
Subject: Senate Seal
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62841 From: QFabiusMaxmi@aol.com Date: 2009-04-09
Subject: Re: Tribune's Report (WAS Re: Exposing SAR)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62842 From: Stephen Gallagher Date: 2009-04-09
Subject: Re: Senate Seal
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62843 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2009-04-10
Subject: Re: Seal/was Tribune's Report/was Exposing SAR
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62844 From: Steve Moore Date: 2009-04-10
Subject: Resignation of Quaestor
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62845 From: Q. Valerius Poplicola Date: 2009-04-10
Subject: Re: Resignation of Quaestor
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62846 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2009-04-10
Subject: Re: Resignation of Quaestor
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62847 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2009-04-10
Subject: Re: Seal/was Tribune's Report/was Exposing SAR
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62848 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2009-04-10
Subject: a.d. IV Id. Apr.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62849 From: Steve Moore Date: 2009-04-10
Subject: Re: Resignation of Quaestor
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62850 From: Cn. Cornelius Lentulus Date: 2009-04-10
Subject: Reconstruction of Roman Censorship
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62851 From: L Julia Aquila Date: 2009-04-10
Subject: Re: Exposing Senate Acts of Illegality!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62852 From: L Julia Aquila Date: 2009-04-10
Subject: Re: Exposing Senate Acts of Illegality!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62853 From: M.CVR.COMPLVTENSIS Date: 2009-04-10
Subject: Re: Resignation of Quaestor
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62854 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2009-04-10
Subject: A Question of Valid Candidacy
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62855 From: Lucius Coruncanius Cato Date: 2009-04-10
Subject: L. Coruncanius Cato's candidacy for Aedilis Curulis
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62856 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2009-04-10
Subject: Re: Resignation of Quaestor
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62857 From: M.CVR.COMPLVTENSIS Date: 2009-04-10
Subject: Re: Resignation of Quaestor
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62858 From: Kristoffer From Date: 2009-04-10
Subject: Re: No Question of Invalid Candidacy
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62859 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2009-04-10
Subject: Re: Exposing Senate Acts of Illegality!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62860 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2009-04-10
Subject: Re: No Question of Invalid Candidacy
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62861 From: L Julia Aquila Date: 2009-04-10
Subject: Re: Exposing Senate Acts of Illegality!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62862 From: gaius_ambrosius_cunobelinus Date: 2009-04-10
Subject: Re: Exposing Senate Acts of Illegality!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62863 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2009-04-10
Subject: Re: No Question of Invalid Candidacy
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62864 From: Kristoffer From Date: 2009-04-10
Subject: Re: No Question of Invalid Candidacy
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62865 From: gaiuspopilliuslaenas Date: 2009-04-10
Subject: Re: Exposing Senate Acts of Illegality!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62866 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2009-04-10
Subject: Re: No Question of Invalid Candidacy
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62867 From: L Julia Aquila Date: 2009-04-10
Subject: Re: A Question of Valid Candidacy
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62868 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2009-04-10
Subject: Re: Exposing Senate Acts of Illegality!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62869 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2009-04-10
Subject: Re: Exposing Senate Acts of Illegality!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62870 From: Gaius Vipsanius Agrippa Date: 2009-04-10
Subject: Call for candidates
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62871 From: Kristoffer From Date: 2009-04-10
Subject: McCarthyism (Was: Exposing Senate Acts of Illegality!)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62872 From: L Julia Aquila Date: 2009-04-10
Subject: Re: Exposing Senate Acts of Illegality!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62873 From: Gnaeus Iulius Caesar Date: 2009-04-10
Subject: Re: A Question of Valid Candidacy
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62874 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2009-04-10
Subject: Re: Exposing Senate Acts of Illegality!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62875 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2009-04-10
Subject: Totalitarian TPTB Vs Re: McCarthyism (Was: Exposing Senate
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62876 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2009-04-10
Subject: Moderation policy
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62877 From: L Julia Aquila Date: 2009-04-10
Subject: Re: A Question of Valid Candidacy
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62878 From: L Julia Aquila Date: 2009-04-10
Subject: Re: Exposing Senate Acts of Illegality!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62879 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2009-04-10
Subject: Re: A Question of Valid Candidacy
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62880 From: Gnaeus Iulius Caesar Date: 2009-04-10
Subject: Re: A Question of Valid Candidacy
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62881 From: Chantal Gaudiano Date: 2009-04-10
Subject: Re: L. Coruncanius Cato's candidacy for Aedilis Curulis
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62882 From: Lucius Coruncanius Cato Date: 2009-04-10
Subject: Re: NR Disaster Relief Fund / Emergency fund
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62883 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2009-04-10
Subject: Why am I moderated?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62884 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2009-04-10
Subject: Re: Moderation policy
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62885 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2009-04-10
Subject: Re: Exposing Senate Acts of Illegality!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62886 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2009-04-10
Subject: Why am I moderated?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62887 From: gaiuspopilliuslaenas Date: 2009-04-10
Subject: Re: NR Disaster Relief Fund / Emergency fund
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62888 From: L Julia Aquila Date: 2009-04-10
Subject: Re: A Question of Valid Candidacy
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62889 From: Gnaeus Iulius Caesar Date: 2009-04-10
Subject: Re: A Question of Valid Candidacy
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62890 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2009-04-10
Subject: Re: A Question of Valid Candidacy
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62891 From: L Julia Aquila Date: 2009-04-10
Subject: Re: Exposing Senate Acts of Illegality!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62892 From: Stephen Gallagher Date: 2009-04-10
Subject: Re: McCarthyism OFF TOPIC
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62893 From: M.CVR.COMPLVTENSIS Date: 2009-04-10
Subject: SECOND CALL OF CANDIDATES
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62894 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2009-04-10
Subject: Re: Exposing Senate Acts of Illegality!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62895 From: L Julia Aquila Date: 2009-04-10
Subject: Re: A Question of Valid Candidacy
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62896 From: L Julia Aquila Date: 2009-04-10
Subject: Re: Exposing Senate Acts of Illegality!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62897 From: Kristoffer From Date: 2009-04-10
Subject: Re: McCarthyism OFF TOPIC
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62898 From: Stephen Gallagher Date: 2009-04-10
Subject: Re: McCarthyism OFF TOPIC
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62899 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2009-04-10
Subject: Re: A Question of Valid Candidacy
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62900 From: walkyr@aol.com Date: 2009-04-10
Subject: OT: Maior
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62901 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2009-04-10
Subject: Re: A Question of Valid Candidacy
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62902 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2009-04-10
Subject: Re: Exposing Senate Acts of Illegality!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62903 From: Aulus Scribonius Dento Date: 2009-04-10
Subject: Re: McCarthyism OFF TOPIC
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62904 From: Publius Memmius Albucius Date: 2009-04-10
Subject: McCarthyism: OFF TOPIC
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62907 From: deciusiunius Date: 2009-04-10
Subject: Re: Moderation policy
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62908 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2009-04-11
Subject: a.d. III Id. Apr.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62909 From: Cicero Date: 2009-04-11
Subject: Candidacy for Quaestor
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62910 From: c.aqvillivs_rota Date: 2009-04-11
Subject: PRIEST / SOLDIERS NEEDED
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62911 From: c.aqvillivs_rota Date: 2009-04-11
Subject: TO ALL CITIZENS/PRESS RELEASE
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62912 From: vallenporter Date: 2009-04-11
Subject: Re: TO ALL CITIZENS/PRESS RELEASE
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62913 From: Gaius Petronius Dexter Date: 2009-04-11
Subject: Re: Exposing Senate Acts of Illegality!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62914 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2009-04-11
Subject: Re: TO ALL CITIZENS/PRESS RELEASE
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62915 From: Publius Memmius Albucius Date: 2009-04-11
Subject: IMPORTANT : forum to be closed on next Idus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62916 From: Gaius Petronius Dexter Date: 2009-04-11
Subject: Re: IMPORTANT : forum to be closed on next Idus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62917 From: Q. Valerius Poplicola Date: 2009-04-11
Subject: Re: Exposing Senate Acts of Illegality!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62918 From: Steve Moore Date: 2009-04-11
Subject: Declaration of Candidacy for Quaestor
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62919 From: enodia2002 Date: 2009-04-11
Subject: Disaster Relief
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62920 From: Gaius Petronius Dexter Date: 2009-04-11
Subject: Re: Exposing Senate Acts of Illegality!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62921 From: Lucius Cornelius Cicero Date: 2009-04-11
Subject: Re: Exposing Senate Acts of Illegality!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62922 From: Q. Valerius Poplicola Date: 2009-04-11
Subject: Re: Exposing Senate Acts of Illegality!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62923 From: Q. Valerius Poplicola Date: 2009-04-11
Subject: Re: Exposing Senate Acts of Illegality!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62924 From: Gaius Petronius Dexter Date: 2009-04-11
Subject: Re: Exposing Senate Acts of Illegality!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62925 From: Gnaeus Iulius Caesar Date: 2009-04-11
Subject: CURULE AEDILE EDICT 62-08: APPOINTMENT AND DISMISSAL OF SCRIBAE
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62926 From: Gaius Petronius Dexter Date: 2009-04-11
Subject: Re: Exposing Senate Acts of Illegality!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62927 From: Gaius Petronius Dexter Date: 2009-04-11
Subject: Re: Exposing Senate Acts of Illegality!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62928 From: Lucius Cornelius Cicero Date: 2009-04-11
Subject: Re: Exposing Senate Acts of Illegality!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62929 From: Lucius Cornelius Cicero Date: 2009-04-11
Subject: Re: Exposing Senate Acts of Illegality!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62930 From: Gaius Petronius Dexter Date: 2009-04-11
Subject: Re: Exposing Senate Acts of Illegality!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62931 From: Gaius Petronius Dexter Date: 2009-04-11
Subject: Re: Exposing Senate Acts of Illegality!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62932 From: Q. Valerius Poplicola Date: 2009-04-11
Subject: Re: Exposing Senate Acts of Illegality!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62933 From: Q. Valerius Poplicola Date: 2009-04-11
Subject: Re: Exposing Senate Acts of Illegality!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62934 From: Q. Valerius Poplicola Date: 2009-04-11
Subject: Re: Exposing Senate Acts of Illegality!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62935 From: c.aqvillivs_rota Date: 2009-04-11
Subject: A REAL PRIEST
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62936 From: Aqvillivs Rota Date: 2009-04-11
Subject: Re: Exposing Senate Acts of Illegality!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62937 From: Lucius Cornelius Cicero Date: 2009-04-11
Subject: Re: Exposing Senate Acts of Illegality!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62938 From: Lucius Cornelius Cicero Date: 2009-04-11
Subject: Re: Exposing Senate Acts of Illegality!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62939 From: vallenporter Date: 2009-04-11
Subject: Re: For Gens Reform, many Doubts
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62940 From: vallenporter Date: 2009-04-11
Subject: Re: Sea-change?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62941 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2009-04-11
Subject: Re: A REAL PRIEST
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62942 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2009-04-11
Subject: Re: Exposing Senate Acts of Illegality!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62943 From: Gaius Petronius Dexter Date: 2009-04-11
Subject: Re: Exposing Senate Acts of Illegality!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62944 From: PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@aol.com Date: 2009-04-11
Subject: Re: Exposing Senate Acts of Illegality!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62945 From: Maior Date: 2009-04-11
Subject: Re: Exposing Senate Acts of Illegality!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62946 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2009-04-11
Subject: Re: Exposing Senate Acts of Illegality!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62947 From: Kristoffer From Date: 2009-04-11
Subject: Re: Exposing Senate Acts of Illegality!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62948 From: gualterus_graecus Date: 2009-04-11
Subject: Re: Exposing Senate Acts of Illegality!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62949 From: vallenporter Date: 2009-04-11
Subject: Re: Exposing Senate Acts of Illegality!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62950 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2009-04-11
Subject: Re: Exposing Senate Acts of Illegality!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62951 From: Maior Date: 2009-04-12
Subject: Re: Exposing Senate Acts of Illegality!



Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62772 From: Titus Annaeus Regulus Date: 2009-04-07
Subject: Re: CALL FOR CANDIDATES
I will not be 21 years old until May 4, 2009. How close! Perhaps next year I will run. Best of luck to all the candidates, especially the best one! (whoever that proves to be)
 
Valete,
T. Annaeus Regulus

From: MCC
Sent: Tuesday, April 07, 2009 3:11 AM
Subject: [Nova-Roma] CALL FOR CANDIDATES

I hereby call for candidates to stand for election to the ordinary
magistracies of the Comitia Centuriata and the Comitia Populi Tributa.

Anyone wishing to serve in any of these positions must have been a
citizen for at least six months by Kal. Apr. MMDCCLXII (May 1st, 2009)
and be an assiduus (tax-paying) citizen. I will convene the comitia for
the elections at the end of April, but candidates are welcome to
announce themselves and begin campaigning if they wish.

All potential candidates must contact me with their intention to stand
for office directly by sending a message to M.Curiatius. Complutensis at
NovaRoma dot org in order to be placed on the ballot. Please include the
word "candidate" in the subject of the message, and be sure to tell me
your full Nova Roman name and the office for which you will campaign.
Simply announcing your candidacy to one of the lists shall not be
accepted. You must write to me directly.

Candidacies will be accepted until 21 April 2009 (18.00 hrs CET Rome;
12.00 hrs EST Philadelphia) . The contio is tentatively scheduled to
begin on 26 April, with the elections to follow tentatively beginning on
3 May.

On behalf of the Res Publica Libera Senatus Populique Novae Romae I,
Marcus Curiatius Complutensis, Senior Consul, hereby issue this call for
candidates for the following offices:

I CURULE AEDILE: Must be at least 21 years old as of Kal. Mai. 2762 (May
1st, 2009). Must be assiduus.

III DIRIBITORES: Must be at least 21 years old as of Kal. Mai. 2762 (May
1st, 2009). Must be assiduus.

Datum sub manu mea ante diem VIII Id. Aprilis M. Curiatio M. Iulio
consulibus, in anno AUC MMDCCLXII.

M. Curiatius Complutensis
M. Iulius Severus

Consules

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62773 From: livia_plauta Date: 2009-04-07
Subject: Earth Quake
Ah, a wicked thought: maybe we should work like religious organizations everywhere, and only provide help to those who follow our religion (in our case Religio Romana).

Want help? Then you have to take part in a banquet and eat meat of sacrificed animals. Vindex did say (before the event) that he has the possibility to organize an animal sacrifice.

Valete,
Livia


>
> Salve Maria,
> yes, being rather quake-proof is one of the outstanding features of roman architecture.
> I was exactly thinking about that today, wondering what the big difference is between their architecture and the medieval one, which is a bit more subjected to collapse (never as much as modern buildings, though).
>
>
> Flavi Aquila,
> I'm sure we will find some use for the money you will collect, but you should decide the destination. It can't be used directly to help NR cives, because none were affected (today's news is that L. Quirinus Vesta's son survived because the building he was sleeping in didn't collapse).
> In a few days I will be helping take care of the evacuees in Vindex' hotel. Then, if nobody has done so in the meanwhile, I will let you know some options of where to send the money. We can either destinate it to help directly those hosted in Vindex's hotel, or maybe the best solution would be to give it to one of the non-profit organizations working to help the victims.
>
> Optime valete,
> Livia
>
> >
> > Salvete Omnes,
> >
> > Of course, my heart goes out to all who have suffered in that earthquake, and especially to those who have lost their loved ones and/or their homes. I heard a comment on NPR (which I have on in my shop all day) that most of the buildings which collapsed were modern, built in the last 20 or 30 years, although many were severely damaged. Interestingly, they mentioned that those built by the ancient Romans ... withstood everything relatively well. At any rate, I do hope things settle down, geologically, for a good long time, and that people get the help they need.
> >
> > Valete Bene,
> > C. Maria Caeca
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62774 From: Gnaeus Iulius Caesar Date: 2009-04-07
Subject: Ludi quiz - research hints and prizes
Cn. Iulius Caesar aedilis curulis, omnibus Quiritibus sal.

I thought I would point out that the answers to all the questions can be found with a little bit of basic research on the internet in one of the most popular research tools <hint> :)

Remember this ludi you can catch up and answer previous day's questions right up until the close of the competition.

I will give a personal prize of:

5 Issue 2 "Quadriga" Nova Roman Sestertius Signum for 1st place
3 Issue 2 "Quadriga" Nova Roman Sestertius Signum for 2nd place
2 Issue 2 "Quadriga" Nova Roman Sestertius Signum for 3rd place

In the event of a tie for any of the above places tie breaker questions will be used.

Those in first, second or third place who wish to receive the coins will have to supply me, via private email, with their macronational names and a mailing address.

http://novaroma.org/nr/Sestertius_Signum#Issue_2_.22Quadriga.22

Optime valete

Gnaeus Iulius Caesar
Aedilis Curulis
Senator
Legatus pro praetore Canada Ulterioris
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62775 From: L Julia Aquila Date: 2009-04-07
Subject: Re: caligula
Salve Dexter,

Forgive me but I have this head cold and under normal circumstances I would recognize your cadence amici. Worse I posed the question with the same wide-eyed guileness that can often get one mercilessly attacked here on the ML. *laugh* I did see the link with the "joci" but I think my fever kept me from putting two and two together.
Now here is a link that is a very strange link that a friend sent me having to do with Caligula, I will not say anymore but leave it to our readers to read for themselves:
http://www.divineloveministry.org/famouspeople/caligula.htm

Gratias et cura ut valeas,

Julia

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Gaius Petronius Dexter" <jfarnoud94@...> wrote:
>
> C. Dexter Juliae Aquilae s.p.d.,
>
> > You have my attention now. I have heard Caligula called many things, and I know he saw himself as a god, but this is the first time I have heard him referred to as "spiritual." Can you explain please?
>
> I am not sure that my English can develop all the depth of my mind. So I shall be short. But it is manifeste that the "madness" of Caligula was in fact black humour. Many things related by Suetonius are witticism turned into madness.
>
> Albert Camus in his play "Caligula" shows that very well. This witticism actually was not funny, but cruel, because he had around him many cowards.
>
> Cura ut valeas.
> C. Petronius Dexter
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62776 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2009-04-07
Subject: Re: caligula
Cato Iuliae Aquilae sal.

Salve.

What a horrible despicable disgusting

LOL just kidding. That was an...interesting little voyage into the unpredictable!

It's odd one another hand as well because Caligula isn't particularly known for a general persecution of Christians. It seems like it was senators he went after, mostly. And their wives. And daughters. And sons.

And we know the Jews really irritated him because they wouldn't worship him.

Vale,

Cato
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62777 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2009-04-07
Subject: Re: CALL FOR CANDIDATES
Re: [Nova-Roma] CALL FOR CANDIDATES

  A. Tullia Scholastica T. Annaeo Regulo quiritibus bonae voluntatis S.P.D.

  

I will not be 21 years old until May 4, 2009. How close! Perhaps next year I will run.

    ATS:  Sometimes exceptions are made when the 21st (or other qualifying) birthday is so close to the date of assumption of office.  You might want to ask for an exemption.  


Best of luck to all the candidates, especially the best one! (whoever that proves to be)

Valete,
T. Annaeus Regulus


Vale, et valete.  



From: MCC <mailto:complutensis@...>  
Sent: Tuesday, April 07, 2009 3:11 AM
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com ; NovaRoma-Announce@yahoogroups.com ; NRmagistrates@yahoogroups.com ; Senatus <mailto:SenatusRomanus@yahoogroups.com>  
Subject: [Nova-Roma] CALL FOR CANDIDATES

I hereby call for candidates to stand for election to the ordinary
magistracies of the Comitia Centuriata and the Comitia Populi Tributa.

Anyone wishing to serve in any of these positions must have been a
citizen for at least six months by Kal. Apr. MMDCCLXII (May 1st, 2009)
and be an assiduus (tax-paying) citizen. I will convene the comitia for
the elections at the end of April, but candidates are welcome to
announce themselves and begin campaigning if they wish.

All potential candidates must contact me with their intention to stand
for office directly by sending a message to M.Curiatius.Complutensis at
NovaRoma dot org in order to be placed on the ballot. Please include the
word "candidate" in the subject of the message, and be sure to tell me
your full Nova Roman name and the office for which you will campaign.
Simply announcing your candidacy to one of the lists shall not be
accepted. You must write to me directly.

Candidacies will be accepted until 21 April 2009 (18.00 hrs CET Rome;
12.00 hrs EST Philadelphia). The contio is tentatively scheduled to
begin on 26 April, with the elections to follow tentatively beginning on
3 May.

On behalf of the Res Publica Libera Senatus Populique Novae Romae I,
Marcus Curiatius Complutensis, Senior Consul, hereby issue this call for
candidates for the following offices:

I CURULE AEDILE: Must be at least 21 years old as of Kal. Mai. 2762 (May
1st, 2009). Must be assiduus.

III DIRIBITORES: Must be at least 21 years old as of Kal. Mai. 2762 (May
1st, 2009). Must be assiduus.

Datum sub manu mea ante diem VIII Id. Aprilis M. Curiatio M. Iulio
consulibus, in anno AUC MMDCCLXII.

M. Curiatius Complutensis
M. Iulius Severus

Consules

  
    
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62778 From: L Julia Aquila Date: 2009-04-07
Subject: Earth Quake
Aquila Plautae omnibus sal.

I have no problem whatsoever with animal sacrifice because done properly it is more humane than most methods of getting meat ready for the table. I can even recommend some very good resources, training, for sacred animal sacrifice, including haruspicy and the sacred meal, with no part left unused and put to good use.
I am, however, sensitive to those who are opposed to this for whatever reason and would not impose this on anyone.
If my beliefs on the subject are offensive to anyone, I certainly apologize for being offensive to their sensibilities but not for my beliefs on the subject.

I will assist anyone regardless of their beliefs or how they feel about mine.
That is part of my Religio, my philosophy, and is my way.
Only if they refuse my help will I back away but I doubt those suffering in this horrendous tragedy would ask what religion I am.

I only wish I could go to Italy and help out even if it is to serve those in Vindex's hotel or at one of the evacuee camps.
I urge all who cannot go to Italia to donate at your local Red Cross, here in the states, the American Red Cross:
http://www.redcross.org/
For the International Red Cross:
http://www.icrc.org/
Please designate that your donation is for the L'Aquila Earthquake.
So far the Italian Red Cross has not asked for International help but this could change as, I understand, aftershocks continue to shake the region.
I am keeping the victims and their families, the rescue workers, medical personnel and all who are pitching in my thoughts and prayers,

Vale, et valéte,

Julia Aquila


--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "livia_plauta" <livia.plauta@...> wrote:
>
> Ah, a wicked thought: maybe we should work like religious organizations everywhere, and only provide help to those who follow our religion (in our case Religio Romana).
>
> Want help? Then you have to take part in a banquet and eat meat of sacrificed animals. Vindex did say (before the event) that he has the possibility to organize an animal sacrifice.
>
> Valete,
> Livia
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62779 From: A. Sempronius Regulus Date: 2009-04-07
Subject: Re: Earth Quake
Salvete,
Could we change the subject line? I was looking for the latest update of an Aquila on the earthquake. The first thing I read is sacrifice and sacred meal -- shock -- before I realized the topic had changed even though the subject line had not.
 
Valete,
A. Sempronius Regulus

--- On Wed, 4/8/09, L Julia Aquila <dis_pensible@...> wrote:

From: L Julia Aquila <dis_pensible@...>
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re:Earth Quake
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Date: Wednesday, April 8, 2009, 1:19 AM

Aquila Plautae omnibus sal.

I have no problem whatsoever with animal sacrifice because done properly it is more humane than most methods of getting meat ready for the table. I can even recommend some very good resources, training, for sacred animal sacrifice, including haruspicy and the sacred meal, with no part left unused and put to good use.
I am, however, sensitive to those who are opposed to this for whatever reason and would not impose this on anyone.
If my beliefs on the subject are offensive to anyone, I certainly apologize for being offensive to their sensibilities but not for my beliefs on the subject.

I will assist anyone regardless of their beliefs or how they feel about mine.
That is part of my Religio, my philosophy, and is my way.
Only if they refuse my help will I back away but I doubt those suffering in this horrendous tragedy would ask what religion I am.

I only wish I could go to Italy and help out even if it is to serve those in Vindex's hotel or at one of the evacuee camps.
I urge all who cannot go to Italia to donate at your local Red Cross, here in the states, the American Red Cross:
http://www.redcross .org/
For the International Red Cross:
http://www.icrc. org/
Please designate that your donation is for the L'Aquila Earthquake.
So far the Italian Red Cross has not asked for International help but this could change as, I understand, aftershocks continue to shake the region.
I am keeping the victims and their families, the rescue workers, medical personnel and all who are pitching in my thoughts and prayers,

Vale, et valéte,

Julia Aquila

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com, "livia_plauta" <livia.plauta@ ...> wrote:
>
> Ah, a wicked thought: maybe we should work like religious organizations everywhere, and only provide help to those who follow our religion (in our case Religio Romana).
>
> Want help? Then you have to take part in a banquet and eat meat of sacrificed animals. Vindex did say (before the event) that he has the possibility to organize an animal sacrifice.
>
> Valete,
> Livia


Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62780 From: Titus Annaeus Regulus Date: 2009-04-07
Subject: Re: CALL FOR CANDIDATES
If it seems that offices may go empty for lack of candidates perhaps I will consider asking for such an exemption. If there are others who fully fulfill the laws of candidacy then I will simply wait until next year. I am full up with a provincial governorship and a pair of scriba positions at the moment and am quite happy to pass the buck for now. So I will wait and see. So far we have had some excellent candidates step forward, hopefully this continues.
 
Vale,
T. Annaeus Regulus

Sent: Tuesday, April 07, 2009 9:41 PM
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] CALL FOR CANDIDATES


  A. Tullia Scholastica T. Annaeo Regulo quiritibus bonae voluntatis S.P.D.

  

I will not be 21 years old until May 4, 2009. How close! Perhaps next year I will run.

    ATS:  Sometimes exceptions are made when the 21st (or other qualifying) birthday is so close to the date of assumption of office.  You might want to ask for an exemption.  


Best of luck to all the candidates, especially the best one! (whoever that proves to be)

Valete,
T. Annaeus Regulus


Vale, et valete.  



From: MCC <mailto:complutensis @...>  
Sent: Tuesday, April 07, 2009 3:11 AM
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com ; NovaRoma-Announce@ yahoogroups. com ; NRmagistrates@ yahoogroups. com ; Senatus <mailto:SenatusRoman us@yahoogroups. com>  
Subject: [Nova-Roma] CALL FOR CANDIDATES

I hereby call for candidates to stand for election to the ordinary
magistracies of the Comitia Centuriata and the Comitia Populi Tributa.

Anyone wishing to serve in any of these positions must have been a
citizen for at least six months by Kal. Apr. MMDCCLXII (May 1st, 2009)
and be an assiduus (tax-paying) citizen. I will convene the comitia for
the elections at the end of April, but candidates are welcome to
announce themselves and begin campaigning if they wish.

All potential candidates must contact me with their intention to stand
for office directly by sending a message to M.Curiatius. Complutensis at
NovaRoma dot org in order to be placed on the ballot. Please include the
word "candidate" in the subject of the message, and be sure to tell me
your full Nova Roman name and the office for which you will campaign.
Simply announcing your candidacy to one of the lists shall not be
accepted. You must write to me directly.

Candidacies will be accepted until 21 April 2009 (18.00 hrs CET Rome;
12.00 hrs EST Philadelphia) . The contio is tentatively scheduled to
begin on 26 April, with the elections to follow tentatively beginning on
3 May.

On behalf of the Res Publica Libera Senatus Populique Novae Romae I,
Marcus Curiatius Complutensis, Senior Consul, hereby issue this call for
candidates for the following offices:

I CURULE AEDILE: Must be at least 21 years old as of Kal. Mai. 2762 (May
1st, 2009). Must be assiduus.

III DIRIBITORES: Must be at least 21 years old as of Kal. Mai. 2762 (May
1st, 2009). Must be assiduus.

Datum sub manu mea ante diem VIII Id. Aprilis M. Curiatio M. Iulio
consulibus, in anno AUC MMDCCLXII.

M. Curiatius Complutensis
M. Iulius Severus

Consules

  
    

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62781 From: L Julia Aquila Date: 2009-04-07
Subject: Re: caligula
Salve Catoni,

>That was an...interesting little voyage into the
>unpredictable!

At least you found words; I was torn between laughter and not wanting to be disrespectful. I will not say which I indulged. But then I am certain that some of my beliefs, as well as yours, have been viewed as a bit odd and illogical as well. The only retort I would have for that is "that's the way uh huh uh I like it."

>It's odd one another hand as well because Caligula isn't >particularly known for a general persecution of Christians.

The link was odd even without that knowledge ;-)

Now I have to go lay down because my sides hurt, uhm, because I have a URI.

Vale,

Julia Aquila


--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Gaius Equitius Cato" <mlcinnyc@...> wrote:
>
> Cato Iuliae Aquilae sal.
>
> Salve.
>
> What a horrible despicable disgusting
>
> LOL just kidding. That was an...interesting little voyage into the unpredictable!
>
> It's odd one another hand as well because Caligula isn't particularly known for a general persecution of Christians. It seems like it was senators he went after, mostly. And their wives. And daughters. And sons.
>
> And we know the Jews really irritated him because they wouldn't worship him.
>
> Vale,
>
> Cato
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62782 From: L Julia Aquila Date: 2009-04-07
Subject: Earth Quake
Salve Semproni,

I beleive the topic was quided back to the subject line with little fanfare to the subject of L'Aquila

I repeat the information where one can go to donate:

I only wish I could go to Italy and help out even if it is to serve those in Vindex's hotel or at one of the evacuee camps.
I urge all who cannot go to Italia to donate at your local Red Cross, here in the states, the American Red Cross:
http://www.redcross .org/
For the International Red Cross:
http://www.icrc org/
Please designate that your donation is for the L'Aquila Earthquake.
So far the Italian Red Cross has not asked for International help but this could change as, I understand, aftershocks continue to shake the region.
I am keeping the victims and their families, the rescue workers, medical personnel and all who are pitching in my thoughts and prayers,

Vale,

Julia Aquila


--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "A. Sempronius Regulus" <asempronius.regulus@...> wrote:
>
> Salvete,
> Could we change the subject line? I was looking for the latest update of an Aquila on the earthquake. The first thing I read is sacrifice and sacred meal -- shock -- before I realized the topic had changed even though the subject line had not.
>  
> Valete,
> A. Sempronius Regulus
>
> --- On Wed, 4/8/09, L Julia Aquila <dis_pensible@...> wrote:
>
>
> From: L Julia Aquila <dis_pensible@...>
> Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re:Earth Quake
> To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> Date: Wednesday, April 8, 2009, 1:19 AM
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Aquila Plautae omnibus sal.
>
> I have no problem whatsoever with animal sacrifice because done properly it is more humane than most methods of getting meat ready for the table. I can even recommend some very good resources, training, for sacred animal sacrifice, including haruspicy and the sacred meal, with no part left unused and put to good use.
> I am, however, sensitive to those who are opposed to this for whatever reason and would not impose this on anyone.
> If my beliefs on the subject are offensive to anyone, I certainly apologize for being offensive to their sensibilities but not for my beliefs on the subject.
>
> I will assist anyone regardless of their beliefs or how they feel about mine.
> That is part of my Religio, my philosophy, and is my way.
> Only if they refuse my help will I back away but I doubt those suffering in this horrendous tragedy would ask what religion I am.
>
> I only wish I could go to Italy and help out even if it is to serve those in Vindex's hotel or at one of the evacuee camps.
> I urge all who cannot go to Italia to donate at your local Red Cross, here in the states, the American Red Cross:
> http://www.redcross .org/
> For the International Red Cross:
> http://www.icrc org/
> Please designate that your donation is for the L'Aquila Earthquake.
> So far the Italian Red Cross has not asked for International help but this could change as, I understand, aftershocks continue to shake the region.
> I am keeping the victims and their families, the rescue workers, medical personnel and all who are pitching in my thoughts and prayers,
>
> Vale, et valéte,
>
> Julia Aquila
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com, "livia_plauta" <livia.plauta@ ...> wrote:
> >
> > Ah, a wicked thought: maybe we should work like religious organizations everywhere, and only provide help to those who follow our religion (in our case Religio Romana).
> >
> > Want help? Then you have to take part in a banquet and eat meat of sacrificed animals. Vindex did say (before the event) that he has the possibility to organize an animal sacrifice.
> >
> > Valete,
> > Livia
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62783 From: enodia2002 Date: 2009-04-07
Subject: Candidacy for Diribitor
V. Rutilia Enodiaria Omnibus SPD

Salvete,

I, Vibia Rutilia Enodiaria declare my candidacy for the office of Diribitor. I am well over the age of 21 (survived the 80's) and an assidui. I've been a member of Nova Roma since 2004, however I was not active for several years because of illness.

While I have held no previous office in Nova Roma, I have practical experience as a precinct captain and election judge. Our state recently went to run-off voting, which was an exciting educational experience. I am on the executive board of our local neighborhood council as well as a state-wide citizen action organization. Recently I completed a tenure with a national citizen organization.

Volunteer organizations function best when all of the parts are given enthusiastic attention. I look forward to learning more about Nova Roma and citizens from the ground level.

Valete!

V. Rutilia Enodiaria

P.S.: The censors have suggested that I find another cognomen, which I'm working on.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62784 From: pompeia_minucia_tiberia Date: 2009-04-07
Subject: Earth Quake
---Livia:

I doth protest.

Are you trying to be funny? If so, the joke bombed, big time. What would compel you to write what you did below...where did the need to write it come from? I agree with your appraisal of 'wicked thought'.


I come from a small city of approximately 1/3 Italian ancestry, and our Italian people (and their friends and neighbours here) are quite concerned. Money is being sent from other parts of Canada also. Your suggestion that benefactors of any ilk (because they are not of *your* religion) are therefore asking L'Aquila victims to show their 'catholic card' or their 'star of David' 'pentagram' whatever, before they are assisted from the earthquake rubble, borders on sadistic, and demoralizes and degrades the true intentions of many individuals. ...apparently because, as you write below, these benefactors are behaving like 'religious organizations everywhere'


"like religious organizations everywhere" is a stale propaganda tool, employing a blanket, distorted application of the sincere efforts of many many people... unless of course you are indeed aware of the dynamics of 'religious organizations everywhere' and are accurately attuned to the motivations of persons subsribed to them. But I don't think you are quite that *all knowing*.

I imagine you would like people in this forum to see things as you do, because you wouldn't make these statements otherwise. This is a rather poor time to generate religious argument, regardless of your religious persuasion.

Do you really think cultores should behave this way, based on your subjective insistance that 'religious organizations everywhere' do'? I don't. Even in jest, that's bizarre.


I know you enjoy your religious beliefs, and I don't care what 'religion' you choose, but before you decry the spiritual and moral maturity and motivations of individuals and religions you don't even know, you might want to analyze your own.

I normally ignore your petty religious jabs, but this is not the time and place, for sure.

And I appreciate that you are Italian, and are part of relief effort...this doesn't make your remarks any more appropriate. Especially at this time. And it doesn't make the sincere efforts of others unappreciable.

Pompeia


In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "livia_plauta" <livia.plauta@...> wrote:
>
> Ah, a wicked thought: maybe we should work like religious organizations everywhere, and only provide help to those who follow our religion (in our case Religio Romana).
>
> Want help? Then you have to take part in a banquet and eat meat of sacrificed animals. Vindex did say (before the event) that he has the possibility to organize an animal sacrifice.
>
> Valete,
> Livia
>
>
> >
> [...]
> > >
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62785 From: Maior Date: 2009-04-07
Subject: Earth Quake
Salve Pompeia;
it is called humour, the 'wicked thought' is the indication, that what follows will be ironic and mordant.
This saritic wit goes back to Juvenal and Horace, having lived abroad I can tell you Europeans do have an ironic wit, quite different from North Americans.

I thought Livia droll; you didn't, but there is no need to lambaste someone here for having a different view. Otherwise Jonathan Swift would never have written 'A Modest Proposal.'
http://art-bin.com/art/omodest.html

optime vale
Maior



>
> I doth protest.
>
> Are you trying to be funny? If so, the joke bombed, big time. What would compel you to write what you did below...where did the need to write it come from? I agree with your appraisal of 'wicked thought'.
>
>
> I come from a small city of approximately 1/3 Italian ancestry, and our Italian people (and their friends and neighbours here) are quite concerned. Money is being sent from other parts of Canada also. Your suggestion that benefactors of any ilk (because they are not of *your* religion) are therefore asking L'Aquila victims to show their 'catholic card' or their 'star of David' 'pentagram' whatever, before they are assisted from the earthquake rubble, borders on sadistic, and demoralizes and degrades the true intentions of many individuals. ...apparently because, as you write below, these benefactors are behaving like 'religious organizations everywhere'
>
>
> "like religious organizations everywhere" is a stale propaganda tool, employing a blanket, distorted application of the sincere efforts of many many people... unless of course you are indeed aware of the dynamics of 'religious organizations everywhere' and are accurately attuned to the motivations of persons subsribed to them. But I don't think you are quite that *all knowing*.
>
> I imagine you would like people in this forum to see things as you do, because you wouldn't make these statements otherwise. This is a rather poor time to generate religious argument, regardless of your religious persuasion.
>
> Do you really think cultores should behave this way, based on your subjective insistance that 'religious organizations everywhere' do'? I don't. Even in jest, that's bizarre.
>
>
> I know you enjoy your religious beliefs, and I don't care what 'religion' you choose, but before you decry the spiritual and moral maturity and motivations of individuals and religions you don't even know, you might want to analyze your own.
>
> I normally ignore your petty religious jabs, but this is not the time and place, for sure.
>
> And I appreciate that you are Italian, and are part of relief effort...this doesn't make your remarks any more appropriate. Especially at this time. And it doesn't make the sincere efforts of others unappreciable.
>
> Pompeia
>
>
> In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "livia_plauta" <livia.plauta@> wrote:
> >
> > Ah, a wicked thought: maybe we should work like religious organizations everywhere, and only provide help to those who follow our religion (in our case Religio Romana).
> >
> > Want help? Then you have to take part in a banquet and eat meat of sacrificed animals. Vindex did say (before the event) that he has the possibility to organize an animal sacrifice.
> >
> > Valete,
> > Livia
> >
> >
> > >
> > [...]
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62786 From: L Julia Aquila Date: 2009-04-07
Subject: Earth Quake
Salvete Omnes,

I just received a link to an interesting article detailing "variety of factors conspire to make Italy particularly vulnerableÂ…"

http://www.stuff.co.nz/world/2321717/Medieval-buildings-blamed-for-Italian-quake-devastation

Earlier I read in this thread someone mentioned that it was the modern buildings that failed, and yes they did, mostly in Abruzzo, which authorities say:
"modern buildings in Italy - nondescript apartment houses and public buildings - often don't meet current standards in seismic safety. Public works contracts, especially in Italy's south, are vulnerable to infiltration by organised crime, prosecutors say. Builders often don't use the best materials, being pressured by mobsters to rely on suppliers close to organised crime."

However L'Aquila is a Medieval town and it is this fact that attracts tourists, historians, archeologists etc. to the area. This I find this heartbreaking because I know many will never be restored. I was fortunate to see this but my descendants will not be as fortunate.
Still, nothing can compare with the loss of precious life lost in the region:
"The UN International Strategy for Disaster Reduction said Monday that "buildings are the main killers when earthquakes strike." The UN noted that many of the old structures in L'Aquila did not meet modern seismic standards."

I am not certain of all the reasons why but as a rule if a building is slated for reconstruction it is usually of the Ancient Roman era; that is unless it is an important Church or Cathedral.
"Giorgio Croci, a Rome-based engineer and expert on ancient monuments like the Colosseum in the Italian capital, singled out building methods as a key factor in L'Aquila's damage. Ancient Romans used high-quality mortar and stone to put up monuments and buildings that have lasted some 2000 years, and Renaissance construction often boasted high-quality quarried stone and proper proportions, he said."

Medieval buildings are the last to get attention even though people still live in them to this day. The article states that nearly half of Italy is considered seismically dangerous and of that vulnerable area on 14% of the buildings meet seismic safety standards:
"Builders in the impoverished medieval era, however, often skimped on the quality of materials and generally erected less massive buildings, he said. As a result, medieval structures are more likely to sustain substantial damage in a quake."

We often hear on the ML people talking about the culture of this and that, vehemently defending a tenet based on a "culture", and here is another statement about one's "culture":
"We get all worked up after every earthquake, but it's not in our culture to construct buildings the right way in a quake zone - that is, build buildings that can resist (quakes) and retrofit old ones. This has never been done," Boschi said."

Hopefully some of the donation money will go into the much needed and absent, according to this article, anti-seismic protection.

Valete,

Julia Aquila


--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "C. Maria Caeca" <shoshanahathaway@...> wrote:
>
> Salvete Omnes,
>
> Of course, my heart goes out to all who have suffered in that earthquake, and especially to those who have lost their loved ones and/or their homes. I heard a comment on NPR (which I have on in my shop all day) that most of the buildings which collapsed were modern, built in the last 20 or 30 years, although many were severely damaged. Interestingly, they mentioned that those built by the ancient Romans ... withstood everything relatively well. At any rate, I do hope things settle down, geologically, for a good long time, and that people get the help they need.
>
> Valete Bene,
> C. Maria Caeca
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62787 From: pompeia_minucia_tiberia Date: 2009-04-07
Subject: Earth Quake
---Maior:


In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Maior" <rory12001@...> wrote:
>
> Salve Pompeia;
> [...]
>
> I thought Livia droll;

Pompeia: I'm sure you did, but you didn't need to tell me that Maior, really :>)

> you didn't

Pompeia: Nope, not this time. Hardly the time for *jokes* about the motivations of others (world wide at that), or other misplaced agenda. Anyone can pull the humor ticket, you know. Fair enough. But I can call the joke good, or say it groaned. Which is what I did. My opinion.


but there is no need to lambaste someone here for having a different view.

Pompeia: Oh really? I shouldn't tell Livia I don't like her jokes? Why?
Now that you mention it Maior, I find you *lambaste* others at every opportunity when their opinions differ from yours. "No stones unturned" comes to mind.

Something else you seem pretty consistent at Maior, now that I think of it: defending Livia :>). No need. She can speak for herself if she wishes.

I didn't like her misplaced and inappropriate *humor* Maior. I am as entitled to my opinion as you and Livia are to yours. I think you need to realize that you have to live with people disagreeing with you once in a while.


Otherwise Jonathan Swift would never have written 'A Modest Proposal.'
> http://art-bin.com/art/omodest.html

Pompeia: I am familiar with this work, thanks!
>
> optime vale
> Maior

Pompeia
>
>
>
> >
> > I doth protest.
> >
> > Are you trying to be funny? If so, the joke bombed, big time. What would compel you to write what you did below...where did the need to write it come from? I agree with your appraisal of 'wicked thought'.
> >
> >
> > I come from a small city of approximately 1/3 Italian ancestry, and our Italian people (and their friends and neighbours here) are quite concerned. Money is being sent from other parts of Canada also. Your suggestion that benefactors of any ilk (because they are not of *your* religion) are therefore asking L'Aquila victims to show their 'catholic card' or their 'star of David' 'pentagram' whatever, before they are assisted from the earthquake rubble, borders on sadistic, and demoralizes and degrades the true intentions of many individuals. ...apparently because, as you write below, these benefactors are behaving like 'religious organizations everywhere'
> >
> >
> > "like religious organizations everywhere" is a stale propaganda tool, employing a blanket, distorted application of the sincere efforts of many many people... unless of course you are indeed aware of the dynamics of 'religious organizations everywhere' and are accurately attuned to the motivations of persons subsribed to them. But I don't think you are quite that *all knowing*.
> >
> > I imagine you would like people in this forum to see things as you do, because you wouldn't make these statements otherwise. This is a rather poor time to generate religious argument, regardless of your religious persuasion.
> >
> > Do you really think cultores should behave this way, based on your subjective insistance that 'religious organizations everywhere' do'? I don't. Even in jest, that's bizarre.
> >
> >
> > I know you enjoy your religious beliefs, and I don't care what 'religion' you choose, but before you decry the spiritual and moral maturity and motivations of individuals and religions you don't even know, you might want to analyze your own.
> >
> > I normally ignore your petty religious jabs, but this is not the time and place, for sure.
> >
> > And I appreciate that you are Italian, and are part of relief effort...this doesn't make your remarks any more appropriate. Especially at this time. And it doesn't make the sincere efforts of others unappreciable.
> >
> > Pompeia
> >
> >
> > In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "livia_plauta" <livia.plauta@> wrote:
> > >
> > > Ah, a wicked thought: maybe we should work like religious organizations everywhere, and only provide help to those who follow our religion (in our case Religio Romana).
> > >
> > > Want help? Then you have to take part in a banquet and eat meat of sacrificed animals. Vindex did say (before the event) that he has the possibility to organize an animal sacrifice.
> > >
> > > Valete,
> > > Livia
> > >
> > >
> > > >
> > > [...]
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62788 From: enodia2002 Date: 2009-04-08
Subject: Earth Quake
As long as Vindex isn't running the Hotel California, things should be ok.

V R E




--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "pompeia_minucia_tiberia" <pompeia_minucia_tiberia@...> wrote:
>
> ---Maior:
>
>
> In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Maior" <rory12001@> wrote:
> >
> > Salve Pompeia;
> > [...]
> >
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62789 From: Gaius Petronius Dexter Date: 2009-04-08
Subject: Re: caligula
Have Julia,

> Now here is a link that is a very strange link that a friend sent me having to do with Caligula, I will not say anymore but leave it to our readers to read for themselves:
> http://www.divineloveministry.org/famouspeople/caligula.htm

I think that the "caligula" of this link is not Caligula but Nero.

Cura ut valeas.
C. Petronius Dexter
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62790 From: Titus Flavius Aquila Date: 2009-04-08
Subject: AW: [Nova-Roma] Re:Earth Quake
Salve Plauta,
 
thank you for the very good news that no citizens of Nova Roma in Italia have been affected.
 
Thanks to the Gods !
 
Concerning the Vindex Hotel, I had thought about this as well , as this is direct help by a Nova Roman citizen to his Italian neighbours.
I will collect the money and as soon as possible I will transfer it toVindex, if he agrees, thus our help is directly coming from Nova Roman citizens
to help his fellow country men.
 
 
Optime vale
Titus Flavius Aquila


Von: livia_plauta <livia.plauta@...>
An: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Gesendet: Dienstag, den 7. April 2009, 23:18:09 Uhr
Betreff: [Nova-Roma] Re:Earth Quake

Salve Maria,
yes, being rather quake-proof is one of the outstanding features of roman architecture.
I was exactly thinking about that today, wondering what the big difference is between their architecture and the medieval one, which is a bit more subjected to collapse (never as much as modern buildings, though).

Flavi Aquila,
I'm sure we will find some use for the money you will collect, but you should decide the destination. It can't be used directly to help NR cives, because none were affected (today's news is that L. Quirinus Vesta's son survived because the building he was sleeping in didn't collapse).
In a few days I will be helping take care of the evacuees in Vindex' hotel. Then, if nobody has done so in the meanwhile, I will let you know some options of where to send the money. We can either destinate it to help directly those hosted in Vindex's hotel, or maybe the best solution would be to give it to one of the non-profit organizations working to help the victims.

Optime valete,
Livia

>
> Salvete Omnes,
>
> Of course, my heart goes out to all who have suffered in that earthquake, and especially to those who have lost their loved ones and/or their homes. I heard a comment on NPR (which I have on in my shop all day) that most of the buildings which collapsed were modern, built in the last 20 or 30 years, although many were severely damaged. Interestingly, they mentioned that those built by the ancient Romans ... withstood everything relatively well. At any rate, I do hope things settle down, geologically, for a good long time, and that people get the help they need.
>
> Valete Bene,
> C. Maria Caeca
>


Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62791 From: Numero 2 Date: 2009-04-08
Subject: Re: Earth Quake
Others earthquakes.
Yesterday evening (magnitudo 4.5) and this this morning in L'Aquila.
Others near Forlì, Udine, Florence, Ravenna, but not so strong (between
2.8 and 3.5)

See photos of the disaster here (earthquake in italian is "terremoto")

http://www.repubblica.it/2006/05/gallerie/cronaca/terremoto-risveglio/terremoto-risveglio.html
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62792 From: Titus Flavius Aquila Date: 2009-04-08
Subject: AW: [Nova-Roma] Re:Earth Quake
Salve Pompeia,
 
I agree with your statement.
 
Although that does not mean, that we have to avoid the idea stating that help is being provided especially from Nova Roma citizens for their fellow
countrymen.
 
I currently collect money in my provincia Germania, and why not state that this help comes directly from Nova Roma.
 
That´s why I came up with the idea to establish an emergency fund of Nova Roma to provide help in catastrophes like this , especially with the
aim to help Nova Roma citizens.
 
Vale bene
Titus Flavius Aquila


Von: pompeia_minucia_tiberia <pompeia_minucia_tiberia@...>
An: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Gesendet: Mittwoch, den 8. April 2009, 04:17:49 Uhr
Betreff: [Nova-Roma] Re:Earth Quake

---Livia:

I doth protest.

Are you trying to be funny? If so, the joke bombed, big time. What would compel you to write what you did below...where did the need to write it come from? I agree with your appraisal of 'wicked thought'.

I come from a small city of approximately 1/3 Italian ancestry, and our Italian people (and their friends and neighbours here) are quite concerned. Money is being sent from other parts of Canada also. Your suggestion that benefactors of any ilk (because they are not of *your* religion) are therefore asking L'Aquila victims to show their 'catholic card' or their 'star of David' 'pentagram' whatever, before they are assisted from the earthquake rubble, borders on sadistic, and demoralizes and degrades the true intentions of many individuals. ...apparently because, as you write below, these benefactors are behaving like 'religious organizations everywhere'

"like religious organizations everywhere" is a stale propaganda tool, employing a blanket, distorted application of the sincere efforts of many many people... unless of course you are indeed aware of the dynamics of 'religious organizations everywhere' and are accurately attuned to the motivations of persons subsribed to them. But I don't think you are quite that *all knowing*.

I imagine you would like people in this forum to see things as you do, because you wouldn't make these statements otherwise. This is a rather poor time to generate religious argument, regardless of your religious persuasion.

Do you really think cultores should behave this way, based on your subjective insistance that 'religious organizations everywhere' do'? I don't. Even in jest, that's bizarre.

I know you enjoy your religious beliefs, and I don't care what 'religion' you choose, but before you decry the spiritual and moral maturity and motivations of individuals and religions you don't even know, you might want to analyze your own.

I normally ignore your petty religious jabs, but this is not the time and place, for sure.

And I appreciate that you are Italian, and are part of relief effort...this doesn't make your remarks any more appropriate. Especially at this time. And it doesn't make the sincere efforts of others unappreciable.

Pompeia

In Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com, "livia_plauta" <livia.plauta@ ...> wrote:

>
> Ah, a wicked thought: maybe we should work like religious organizations everywhere, and only provide help to those who follow our religion (in our case Religio Romana).
>
> Want help? Then you have to take part in a banquet and eat meat of sacrificed animals. Vindex did say (before the event) that he has the possibility to organize an animal
sacrifice.
>
> Valete,
> Livia
>
>
> >
> [...]
> > >
> >
>


Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62793 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2009-04-08
Subject: Re: caligula
Cato Petronio Dextro sal.

Salve Dexter.

That would make more sense vis-a-vis the persecution bit. But to my knowledge only Caligula was caled...uhhh...Caligula; and the name is unusual enough, with its odd little history, that I can't imagine people mistaking the two.

Vale,

Cato

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Gaius Petronius Dexter" <jfarnoud94@...> wrote:
>
> Have Julia,
>
> > Now here is a link that is a very strange link that a friend sent me having to do with Caligula, I will not say anymore but leave it to our readers to read for themselves:
> > http://www.divineloveministry.org/famouspeople/caligula.htm
>
> I think that the "caligula" of this link is not Caligula but Nero.
>
> Cura ut valeas.
> C. Petronius Dexter
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62794 From: livia_plauta Date: 2009-04-08
Subject: Earth Quake
Salvete,
I'm stuck at Budapest airport waiting for my plane to Naples to leave (since 9 hours already) yet I find the time to write.

My joke was prompted by the fact that every day in the metro station in front of my place I see an american charity giving free meals to the homeless, but not before they have to hear religious propaganda and songs. I often feel compassionn for the people who have to stand this in order to get a meal.

So my wicked thought was: what if? What if we behaved like them? But I'm afraid this behaviour is acceptable from christians, but not from other religions, and mine will remain a joke.

To Flavius Aquila:
I'm not sure Vindex wants to handle donations.
Please wait until I get there (a few days still), then I'll let you know.
Evacuees are getting one thousand euros each from the state, so the immediate situatiion is not tragic.
Only there annd in a while it will turn out where help is most needed.

Valete,
Livia


--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Titus Flavius Aquila <titus.aquila@...> wrote:
>
> Salve Pompeia,
>
> I agree with your statement.
>
> Although that does not mean, that we have to avoid the idea stating that help is being provided especially from Nova Roma citizens for their fellow
> countrymen.
>
> I currently collect money�in my provincia Germania, and why not state that this help comes directly from Nova Roma.
>
> That�s why I came up�with the idea to establish an emergency fund of Nova Roma to provide help in catastrophes like this�, especially with the
> aim�to help Nova Roma citizens.
>
> Vale bene
> Titus Flavius Aquila
>
>
>
>
> ________________________________
> Von: pompeia_minucia_tiberia <pompeia_minucia_tiberia@...>
> An: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> Gesendet: Mittwoch, den 8. April 2009, 04:17:49 Uhr
> Betreff: [Nova-Roma] Re:Earth Quake
>
>
> ---Livia:
>
> I doth protest.
>
> Are you trying to be funny? If so, the joke bombed, big time. What would compel you to write what you did below...where did the need to write it come from? I agree with your appraisal of 'wicked thought'.
>
> I come from a small city of approximately 1/3 Italian ancestry, and our Italian people (and their friends and neighbours here) are quite concerned. Money is being sent from other parts of Canada also. Your suggestion that benefactors of any ilk (because they are not of *your* religion) are therefore asking L'Aquila victims to show their 'catholic card' or their 'star of David' 'pentagram' whatever, before they are assisted from the earthquake rubble, borders on sadistic, and demoralizes and degrades the true intentions of many individuals. ...apparently because, as you write below, these benefactors are behaving like 'religious organizations everywhere'
>
> "like religious organizations everywhere" is a stale propaganda tool, employing a blanket, distorted application of the sincere efforts of many many people... unless of course you are indeed aware of the dynamics of 'religious organizations everywhere' and are accurately attuned to the motivations of persons subsribed to them. But I don't think you are quite that *all knowing*.
>
> I imagine you would like people in this forum to see things as you do, because you wouldn't make these statements otherwise. This is a rather poor time to generate religious argument, regardless of your religious persuasion.
>
> Do you really think cultores should behave this way, based on your subjective insistance that 'religious organizations everywhere' do'? I don't. Even in jest, that's bizarre.
>
> I know you enjoy your religious beliefs, and I don't care what 'religion' you choose, but before you decry the spiritual and moral maturity and motivations of individuals and religions you don't even know, you might want to analyze your own.
>
> I normally ignore your petty religious jabs, but this is not the time and place, for sure.
>
> And I appreciate that you are Italian, and are part of relief effort...this doesn't make your remarks any more appropriate. Especially at this time. And it doesn't make the sincere efforts of others unappreciable.
>
> Pompeia
>
> In Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com, "livia_plauta" <livia.plauta@ ...> wrote:
> >
> > Ah, a wicked thought: maybe we should work like religious organizations everywhere, and only provide help to those who follow our religion (in our case Religio Romana).
> >
> > Want help? Then you have to take part in a banquet and eat meat of sacrificed animals. Vindex did say (before the event) that he has the possibility to organize an animal sacrifice.
> >
> > Valete,
> > Livia
> >
> >
> > >
> > [...]
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62795 From: Titus Flavius Aquila Date: 2009-04-08
Subject: AW: [Nova-Roma] Re:Earth Quake
Salve Plauta,
 
thank you very much.
 
I will wait for your notification.
Good luck for your flight to Naples and have a save trip in Italia.
 
Vale bene
Titus Flavius Aquila


Von: livia_plauta <livia.plauta@...>
An: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Gesendet: Mittwoch, den 8. April 2009, 14:12:12 Uhr
Betreff: [Nova-Roma] Re:Earth Quake

Salvete,
I'm stuck at Budapest airport waiting for my plane to Naples to leave (since 9 hours already) yet I find the time to write.

My joke was prompted by the fact that every day in the metro station in front of my place I see an american charity giving free meals to the homeless, but not before they have to hear religious propaganda and songs. I often feel compassionn for the people who have to stand this in order to get a meal.

So my wicked thought was: what if? What if we behaved like them? But I'm afraid this behaviour is acceptable from christians, but not from other religions, and mine will remain a joke.

To Flavius Aquila:
I'm not sure Vindex wants to handle donations.
Please wait until I get there (a few days still), then I'll let you know.
Evacuees are getting one thousand euros each from the state, so the immediate situatiion is not tragic.
Only there annd in a while it will turn out where help is most needed.

Valete,
Livia

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com, Titus Flavius Aquila <titus.aquila@ ...> wrote:
>
> Salve Pompeia,
>
> I agree with your statement.
>
> Although that does not mean, that we have to avoid the idea stating that help is being provided especially from Nova Roma citizens for their fellow
> countrymen.
>
> I currently collect money�in my provincia Germania, and why not state that this help comes directly from Nova Roma.
>
> That�s why I came up�with the idea to establish an emergency fund of Nova Roma to provide help in catastrophes like this�, especially with the
> aim�to help Nova Roma citizens.
>
> Vale bene
> Titus Flavius Aquila
>
>
>
>
> ____________ _________ _________ __
> Von: pompeia_minucia_ tiberia <pompeia_minucia_ tiberia@. ..>
> An: Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com
> Gesendet: Mittwoch, den 8. April 2009, 04:17:49 Uhr
> Betreff: [Nova-Roma] Re:Earth Quake
>
>
> ---Livia:
>
> I doth protest.
>
> Are you trying to be funny? If so, the joke bombed, big time. What would compel you to write what you did below...where did the need to write it come from? I agree with your appraisal of 'wicked thought'.
>
> I come from a small city of approximately 1/3 Italian ancestry, and our Italian people (and their friends and neighbours here) are quite concerned. Money is being sent from other parts of Canada also. Your suggestion that benefactors of any ilk (because they are not of *your* religion) are therefore asking L'Aquila victims to show their 'catholic card' or their 'star of David' 'pentagram' whatever, before they are assisted from the earthquake rubble, borders on sadistic, and demoralizes and degrades the true intentions of many individuals. ...apparently because, as you write below, these benefactors are behaving like 'religious organizations everywhere'
>
> "like religious organizations everywhere" is a stale propaganda tool, employing a blanket, distorted application of the sincere efforts of many many people... unless of course you are indeed aware of the dynamics of 'religious organizations everywhere' and are accurately attuned to the motivations of persons subsribed to them. But I don't think you are quite that *all knowing*.
>
> I imagine you would like people in this forum to see things as you do, because you wouldn't make these statements otherwise. This is a rather poor time to generate religious argument, regardless of your religious persuasion.
>
> Do you really think cultores should behave this way, based on your subjective insistance that 'religious organizations everywhere' do'? I don't. Even in jest, that's bizarre.
>
> I know you enjoy your religious beliefs, and I don't care what 'religion' you choose, but before you decry the spiritual and moral maturity and motivations of individuals and religions you don't even know, you might want to analyze your own.
>
> I normally ignore your petty religious jabs, but this is not the time and place, for sure.
>
> And I appreciate that you are Italian, and are part of relief effort...this doesn't make your remarks any more appropriate. Especially at this time. And it doesn't make the sincere efforts of others unappreciable.
>
> Pompeia
>
> In Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com, "livia_plauta" <livia.plauta@ ...> wrote:
> >
> > Ah, a wicked thought: maybe we should work like religious organizations everywhere, and only provide help to those who follow our religion (in our case Religio Romana).
> >
> > Want help? Then you have to take part in a banquet and eat meat of sacrificed animals. Vindex did say (before the event) that he has the possibility to organize an animal sacrifice.
> >
> > Valete,
> > Livia
> >
> >
> > >
> > [...]
> > > >
> > >
> >
>


Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62796 From: Ugo Coppola Date: 2009-04-08
Subject: Cancellation of Aedilis Plebis candidacy
Publius Constantinus Placidus S.P.D.

Contrary to what I stated in my latest message here, I wish to revoke and cancel my candidacy as Aedilis Plebis since I am now running for Curule Aedile. Indeed, according to the Lex Cornelia Iunia de definitione intervallorum magistratuum, I cannot hold the same office, or run for it, in two consecutive years.

Bene valete,
P. Con. Placidus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62797 From: pompeia_minucia_tiberia Date: 2009-04-08
Subject: Earth Quake
-- Pompeia Aquilo sal


In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Titus Flavius Aquila <titus.aquila@...> wrote:
>
> Salve Pompeia,
>
> I agree with your statement.


Pompeia: Well no, it seems you don't.

Because I, in no way shape or form suggested that NR, or any other organization should keep their donations to this effort a secret. Must be another post from another Pompeia you read.

Nor am I berating the sincere intentions of others who have helped. It was Livia who did that.

Good luck with your excellent initiative, Aquila, BTW.

Pompeia




>
> Although that does not mean, that we have to avoid the idea stating that help is being provided especially from Nova Roma citizens for their fellow
> countrymen.
>
> I currently collect money in my provincia Germania, and why not state that this help comes directly from Nova Roma.
>
> That´s why I came up with the idea to establish an emergency fund of Nova Roma to provide help in catastrophes like this , especially with the
> aim to help Nova Roma citizens.
>
> Vale bene
> Titus Flavius Aquila
>
>
>
>
> ________________________________
> Von: pompeia_minucia_tiberia <pompeia_minucia_tiberia@...>
> An: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> Gesendet: Mittwoch, den 8. April 2009, 04:17:49 Uhr
> Betreff: [Nova-Roma] Re:Earth Quake
>
>
> ---Livia:
>
> I doth protest.
>
> Are you trying to be funny? If so, the joke bombed, big time. What would compel you to write what you did below...where did the need to write it come from? I agree with your appraisal of 'wicked thought'.
>
> I come from a small city of approximately 1/3 Italian ancestry, and our Italian people (and their friends and neighbours here) are quite concerned. Money is being sent from other parts of Canada also. Your suggestion that benefactors of any ilk (because they are not of *your* religion) are therefore asking L'Aquila victims to show their 'catholic card' or their 'star of David' 'pentagram' whatever, before they are assisted from the earthquake rubble, borders on sadistic, and demoralizes and degrades the true intentions of many individuals. ...apparently because, as you write below, these benefactors are behaving like 'religious organizations everywhere'
>
> "like religious organizations everywhere" is a stale propaganda tool, employing a blanket, distorted application of the sincere efforts of many many people... unless of course you are indeed aware of the dynamics of 'religious organizations everywhere' and are accurately attuned to the motivations of persons subsribed to them. But I don't think you are quite that *all knowing*.
>
> I imagine you would like people in this forum to see things as you do, because you wouldn't make these statements otherwise. This is a rather poor time to generate religious argument, regardless of your religious persuasion.
>
> Do you really think cultores should behave this way, based on your subjective insistance that 'religious organizations everywhere' do'? I don't. Even in jest, that's bizarre.
>
> I know you enjoy your religious beliefs, and I don't care what 'religion' you choose, but before you decry the spiritual and moral maturity and motivations of individuals and religions you don't even know, you might want to analyze your own.
>
> I normally ignore your petty religious jabs, but this is not the time and place, for sure.
>
> And I appreciate that you are Italian, and are part of relief effort...this doesn't make your remarks any more appropriate. Especially at this time. And it doesn't make the sincere efforts of others unappreciable.
>
> Pompeia
>
> In Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com, "livia_plauta" <livia.plauta@ ...> wrote:
> >
> > Ah, a wicked thought: maybe we should work like religious organizations everywhere, and only provide help to those who follow our religion (in our case Religio Romana).
> >
> > Want help? Then you have to take part in a banquet and eat meat of sacrificed animals. Vindex did say (before the event) that he has the possibility to organize an animal sacrifice.
> >
> > Valete,
> > Livia
> >
> >
> > >
> > [...]
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62798 From: L Julia Aquila Date: 2009-04-08
Subject: Earth Quake
Salve,

Thank you for this update,

Vale

LJA

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Numero 2 <2@...> wrote:
>
> Others earthquakes.
> Yesterday evening (magnitudo 4.5) and this this morning in L'Aquila.
> Others near Forlì, Udine, Florence, Ravenna, but not so strong (between
> 2.8 and 3.5)
>
> See photos of the disaster here (earthquake in italian is "terremoto")
>
> http://www.repubblica.it/2006/05/gallerie/cronaca/terremoto-risveglio/terremoto-risveglio.html
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62799 From: L Julia Aquila Date: 2009-04-08
Subject: Re: caligula
Aquila Catoni Petroni sal.

I don't think the person "channeling" Caligula had a clear line to the afterlife; the information had interference.
Wonder if if the author was wearing his aluminum foil hat with the right side out?;)
At any rate he obviously does not have his history straight.
Maybe Nero was interrupting and he could not discern between the two.
*smile*

Vale,

Julia
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62800 From: c.aqvillivs_rota Date: 2009-04-08
Subject: ROMAN PRIEST/SOLDIERS NEEDED

Salvete Omnes,

I am currently looking for a NR Priest/s and or Priest/esses as well as soldiers for the performance of a Roman ritual here in South Carolina!

                                (One single one would be fine too)

Who is interested or can help out?

Please respond to my e-mail C.Aqvillivs_ Rota@yahoo. com

Optime vale

C.AQVILLIVS ROTA

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62801 From: Cn. Cornelius Lentulus Date: 2009-04-08
Subject: Cn. Lentulus' Candidacy for Custos
Cn. Cornelius Lentulus custos candidatus: consulibus, praetoribus, tribunis plebis, senatui populoque Novo Romano: salutem plurimam dicit:


Salvete, Quirites!


Seeing the lack of candidates for this office, I offer my candidacy and experience to serve as Custos of Nova Roma. If elected, I will serve with integrity and dutifulness.  This is what I ask your votes for.


I served Nova Roma as quaestor twice, as a consular quaestor and praetorial quaestor. I was rogator. I was accensus and scriba several times and in many offices, and I'm currently, too. My most important offices I currently hold is the pontificate and the governance of Pannonia Provincia.



CN. LENTVLVM CVSTODEM REI PVBLCAE ORO VOS FACIATIS!


Valete, Quirites!



Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus,
P O N T I F E X
SACERDOS CONCORDIAE
------------------------------------------
Legatus Pro Praetore Provinciae Pannoniae
Sacerdos Provinciae Pannoniae
Interpres Linguae Hungaricae
Accensus Consulum M. Curiatii Complutensis et M. Iulii Severi
Scriba Praetoris P. Memmii Albucii
Scriba Censorum Ti. Galerii Paulini et C. Popillii Laenatis
Scriba Aedilis Curulis Cn. Iulii Caesaris
Scriba Rogatricis A. Tulliae Scholasticae
Scriba Interpretis Linguae Latinae A. Tulliae Scholasticae
-------------------------------------------
Magister Sodalitatis Latinitatis
Dominus Factionis Russatae


Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62804 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2009-04-08
Subject: a.d. VI Id. Apr.
Cato omnibus in foro SPD

Salvete!

Hodiernus dies est ante diem VI Idus Aprilis; haec dies nefastus est.

"He could no longer bear great heat or the weight of armour, and therefore wore sleeved tunics fashioned more or less like a breastplate, so that, by creating the impression of armour without his weight, he could be safe from plots and at the same time rouse admiration. Indeed, he often wore this dress when not in battle. His mantle was either of pure purple or of purple with a white stripe
down the centre; though occasionally the stripe only was of purple, as I myself have seen. In Syria, however, and in Mesopotamia he used German clothing and shoes. He also invented a costume of his own, which was made in a rather foreign fashion out of small pieces of cloth sewed together in a kind of cloak; and he not only wore this most of the time himself (in consequence of which he was given the nickname Caracallus), but he also prescribed it as the regular dress
for the soldiers." - Cassius Dio, Roman History, Epitome of Book LXXIX.3

"After this, turning to the war with the Armenians and Parthians, he appointed as military commander a man whose character resembled his own. Then he betook himself to Alexandria, and here he called the people together into the gymnasium and heaped abuse on them; he gave orders, moreover, that those who were physically qualified should be enrolled for military service. But those whom he enrolled he put to death, following the example of Ptolemy Euergetes, the eighth
of those who bore the name Ptolemy. In addition to this he issued an order to his soldiers to slay their hosts and thus caused great slaughter at Alexandria...

"During this time, on the eighth day before the Ides of April, the feast of the Megalensia and his own birthday, while on a journey to Carrhae to do honour to the god Lunus, he stepped aside to satisfy the needs of nature and was thereupon assassinated by the treachery of Macrinus the prefect of the guard, who after his death seized the imperial power. The accomplices in the murder were Nemesianus, his brother Apollinaris, and Triccianus, who was serving as prefect
of the Second Legion, the Parthian, and commanded the irregular cavalry. Marcus Agrippa, too, the commander of the fleet, was privy to it, as well as many members of his staff acting on the instigation of Martialis." - Historia Augusta, Caracalla 6

On this day in AD 217 Marcus Aurelius Severus Antoninus, known as Caracalla, was murdered by his bodyguards at the age of 29, near Carrhae (modern Harran) in Mesopotamia. He is perhaps most famous for the Constitutio Antoniniana, granting Roman citizenship to freemen throughout the Roman Empire; his thermae, the Baths which can still be seen in Rome to this day; and the debasement of the coinage
by about 25% in order (according to Cassius Dio) to pay the legions out of a meagre Imperial Treasury.

Note that here, the Historia Augusta says "on the eighth day before the Ides of April", which would have been two days ago; yet in chapter 5 of Cassius Dio, it reads:

"On the eighth of April, when the emperor had set out from Edessa for Carrhae and had dismounted from his horse to ease himself, Martialis approached as though desiring to say something to him and struck him with a small dagger. Martialis immediately fled and would have escaped detection, had he thrown away his sword; but, as it was, the weapon led to his being recognized by one of the Scythians in attendance upon Antoninus, and he was struck down with a javelin. As for Antoninus, the tribunes, pretending to come to his rescue, slew him. The
Scythian mentioned was in attendance upon Antoninus, not merely as an ally, but also as a kind of body-guard."

and a few lines later:

"Such was the end to which Antoninus came, after living twenty-nine years and four days (for he had been born on the fourth of April), and after ruling six years, two months, and two days."

Scholars have decided that Cassius Dio is the more reliable of the two, and so place Caracalla's death on this day.



On this day in AD 1546, at its fourth session, the Council of Trent adopted Jerome's "Latin Vulgate" as the official Bible of the Roman Catholic Church. (Included in the Vulgate O.T. were the 15 apocryphal books which Protestants reject in their biblical canon.)

Valete!

Cato
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62805 From: L Julia Aquila Date: 2009-04-08
Subject: Re: ROMAN PRIEST/SOLDIERS NEEDED
Salvete omnes,

My very dear friend Gaius Aquillius is a citizen, and brother in blood, a doer who actually built a restaurant from nothing by himself with only his young family to help, pouring everything he had into it. For little over a year and a half I have shared the joys and pains of this project with this industrious citizen and his family as they embraced every small victory and pushed through every large defeat, and there were plenty of those.
He has painted the frescoes himself, jumped through all the many and impossible hoops set before him by city inspectors and other obstacles, prepared and researched the menu and so much more. Of course with his lovely wife, a beloved friend, whose part in this must be mentioned. It was all worth it, rather than talking about it, he did it and he is realizing his part of the Roman dream and he is offering it to us, the citizens of Nova Roma, the fruits of his labor.
For those who truly have the vision of Nova Roma becoming a living breathing entity I humbly suggest emailing Gaius Aquillius and sharing this vision, at least beginning a dialogue with him.
For those living near him or a few hours away, it is worth the trip just to see the magnificent work he has done and to talk with him, a wonderful passionate conversationalist.

Cúráte ut valéatis atque di vos incolumes custodiant,

L. Julia Aquila



--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "c.aqvillivs_rota" <c.aqvillivs_rota@...> wrote:
>
>
> Salvete Omnes,
>
> I am currently looking for a NR Priest/s and or Priest/esses as well as
> soldiers for the performance of a Roman ritual here in South Carolina!
>
> (One single one would be fine too)
>
> Who is interested or can help out?
>
> Please respond to my e-mail C.Aqvillivs_ Rota@yahoo. com
> <mailto:C.Aqvillivs_Rota@...>
>
> Optime vale
>
> C.AQVILLIVS ROTA
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62806 From: Ellen Catalina Date: 2009-04-08
Subject: Re: caligula
She better not try to "channel" my dear Julian in a similar manner or she's going to have to deal with me!- Ellen Catalina

--- On Wed, 4/8/09, L Julia Aquila <dis_pensible@hotmail..com> wrote:

From: L Julia Aquila <dis_pensible@...>
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: caligula
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Date: Wednesday, April 8, 2009, 8:39 AM

Aquila Catoni Petroni sal.

I don't think the person "channeling" Caligula had a clear line to the afterlife; the information had interference.
Wonder if if the author was wearing his aluminum foil hat with the right side out?;)
At any rate he obviously does not have his history straight.
Maybe Nero was interrupting and he could not discern between the two.
*smile*

Vale,

Julia


Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62807 From: Gaius Petronius Dexter Date: 2009-04-08
Subject: Re: caligula
C. Petronius C. Catoni s.p.d.,

> That would make more sense vis-a-vis the persecution bit. But to my knowledge only Caligula was caled...uhhh...Caligula;

Yes of course. But 1)the photo is the face of the young Nero. 2)Caligula did not persecute the christians. [Pontius Pilatus, the governor of Judaea, was back in Rome just when Caligula succeeded Tiberius. And Caligula was emperor four years, and died on 24 january 41. They were not christians in Rome at this time.]

> and the name is unusual enough, with its odd little history, that I can't imagine people mistaking the two.

He made some mix-up.

Vale.
C. Petronius Dexter
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62808 From: galerius_of_rome Date: 2009-04-08
Subject: Exposing Senate Acts of Illegality!
Save et salvete,Greetings and salutations ,Fellow Romans.From time to time it is the duty of the Tribunate of the Plebian Order to post observations on the functioning and the actions of those who have been elected as our representatives in the Senate and upper echelons of our government.Especially now on the eve of a new elections.So therefore I wish to tender a report for the benefit of your knowledge, of the actual goings on, of some of our officials, as I feel my duty to do so.Also, I am not making suggestions as to how you should vote.Only to know your candidates and to choose wisely.As it stands at the present time, there are some very disturbing sounds eminating from the Senate of Nova Roma.Some of these things would threaten the rights of the people and consequently diminish the role, of the individual Roman citizen to be able to have the representation, that is called for in our Constitution.I site for one instance that it
has been discussed, just how to eliminate the Tribunate of the Plebians and to secure the unrivaled power of Consulship.This sounds like an attempted coup attempt, to usurp the rights of the average Roman citizen.Not only are the many debates about subjects which are close to if not downright in total regard for the laws of Nova Roma.Meetings ajourned because no one can agree on anything.With much conduct unbecoming of any official.Profanity and angry indignation among the participants.The questioning of the intelligence of our fine webmaster, who has replaced our last, one run off by the same type of condecending behavior.Making deals and agreements without consulting the people.And the list goes on ad nauseum.A true theatre of the absurd.If it were possible, I would call upon the citizens of our Republic to place a no confidence vote on this group of elected officials, who should be made to explain, these actions to the people or risk re-call.I
hope that others will step forward without fear to tell our citizens their individual experiences.I call upon my colleagues in the Tribunate to speak out knowing full well the truth of this situation.To all citizens who will stand up for their rights for proper representation as provided by our Constitution and our Lex.

Vale et valete,
Ap.Galerius Aurelianus
Tribune of the Plebs
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62809 From: enodia2002 Date: 2009-04-08
Subject: NR Disaster Relief Fund
V. Rutilia SPD

Salvete!

Several people have mentioned disaster relief efforts following the tragic events in Italy. It would be one excellent way to raise NR's profile to be able to make such a donation. Creating a fund to assist our own members in emergency situations, or simply an emergency fund for the organization itself is a wise move for groups that intend to survive.

It's my understanding that at one time funds were raised for an archeological project that later foundered and the funds remain. I believe that the US Tax Code provides a mechanism for 501(c)(3) organizations to deal with these circumstances. While I am not an accountant, I do have the right resource to find out, and would be happy to try. It may be that during the upcoming election we would need a vote of the entire organization for this to be authorized.

I respectfully request that this be taken into consideration.

Valete,

V Rutilia
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62810 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2009-04-08
Subject: Re: NR Disaster Relief Fund
Salve Rutilia,

enodia2002 <walkyr@...> writes:

> V. Rutilia SPD

> It's my understanding that at one time funds were raised for an
> archeological project that later foundered and the funds remain.

If you're thinking about the Magna Mater project, you've been
misinformed. While it has not gone as far as I and many others wish,
it is not dead. Funds raised for the Magna Mater project remain
dedicated to that project, especially since they were donated
explicitly for that project and not to the Nova Roma general fund.

I would not oppose an effort to make a one-time donation from the Nova
Roma treasury to a reputable disaster relief agency in Italy for
earthquake relief. In fact I might well donate to it. But that's a
very different thing from redirecting funds that have already been
designated for another purpose.

Vale,

CN-EQVIT-MARINVS
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62811 From: enodia2002 Date: 2009-04-08
Subject: Re: NR Disaster Relief Fund
Salve,

Thank you, I was indeed misinformed as to the status of the MM project. It would be wonderful to get something like that underway.

In that case we would need to set up an entirely new fund for disaster relief, and I amend my request to that formal effort.

Vale,

Rutilia


--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Gnaeus Equitius Marinus <gawne@...> wrote:
>
> Salve Rutilia,
>
> enodia2002 <walkyr@...> writes:
>
> > V. Rutilia SPD
>
> > It's my understanding that at one time funds were raised for an
> > archeological project that later foundered and the funds remain.
>
> If you're thinking about the Magna Mater project, you've been
> misinformed. While it has not gone as far as I and many others wish,
> it is not dead. Funds raised for the Magna Mater project remain
> dedicated to that project, especially since they were donated
> explicitly for that project and not to the Nova Roma general fund.
>
> I would not oppose an effort to make a one-time donation from the Nova
> Roma treasury to a reputable disaster relief agency in Italy for
> earthquake relief. In fact I might well donate to it. But that's a
> very different thing from redirecting funds that have already been
> designated for another purpose.
>
> Vale,
>
> CN-EQVIT-MARINVS
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62812 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2009-04-09
Subject: Re: NR Disaster Relief Fund
Cato Rutiliae omnibusque in foro SPD

Salve et salvete.

I think that's an excellent idea. I would urge you to write to the consuls so that they can present it to the Senate.

Vale et valete,

Cato



--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "enodia2002" <walkyr@...> wrote:
>
> Salve,
>
> Thank you, I was indeed misinformed as to the status of the MM project. It would be wonderful to get something like that underway.
>
> In that case we would need to set up an entirely new fund for disaster relief, and I amend my request to that formal effort.
>
> Vale,
>
> Rutilia
>
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Gnaeus Equitius Marinus <gawne@> wrote:
> >
> > Salve Rutilia,
> >
> > enodia2002 <walkyr@> writes:
> >
> > > V. Rutilia SPD
> >
> > > It's my understanding that at one time funds were raised for an
> > > archeological project that later foundered and the funds remain.
> >
> > If you're thinking about the Magna Mater project, you've been
> > misinformed. While it has not gone as far as I and many others wish,
> > it is not dead. Funds raised for the Magna Mater project remain
> > dedicated to that project, especially since they were donated
> > explicitly for that project and not to the Nova Roma general fund.
> >
> > I would not oppose an effort to make a one-time donation from the Nova
> > Roma treasury to a reputable disaster relief agency in Italy for
> > earthquake relief. In fact I might well donate to it. But that's a
> > very different thing from redirecting funds that have already been
> > designated for another purpose.
> >
> > Vale,
> >
> > CN-EQVIT-MARINVS
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62813 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2009-04-09
Subject: Re: ROMAN PRIEST/SOLDIERS NEEDED
Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: ROMAN  PRIEST/SOLDIERS NEEDED
A. Tullia Scholastica L. Juliae Aquilae C. Aquillio Rotae quiritibus, sociis, peregrinisque bonae voluntatis S.P.D.
 

Salvete omnes,

My very dear friend Gaius Aquillius is a citizen, and brother in blood, a doer who actually built a restaurant from nothing by himself with only his young family to help, pouring everything he had into it. For little over a year and a half I have shared the joys and pains of this project with this industrious citizen and his family as they embraced every small victory and pushed through every large defeat, and there were plenty of those.

    ATS:  Indeed there were, not least his accident and injuries.
    
He has painted the frescoes himself, jumped through all the many and impossible hoops set before him by city inspectors and other obstacles, prepared and researched the menu and so much more. Of course with his lovely wife, a beloved friend, whose part in this must be mentioned. It was all worth it, rather than talking about it, he did it and he is realizing his part of the Roman dream and he is offering it to us, the citizens of Nova Roma, the fruits of his labor.
For those who truly have the vision of Nova Roma becoming a living breathing entity I humbly suggest emailing Gaius Aquillius and sharing this vision, at least beginning a dialogue with him.
For those living near him or a few hours away, it is worth the trip just to see the magnificent work he has done and to talk with him, a wonderful passionate conversationalist.

    ATS:  I wish I lived nearer.  I have seen photographs of this work in progress, and it is indeed a very beautiful establishment, and Adriano is a wonderful conversationalist...when one can catch him to chat!  Not sure if I can still find his number, though.  Adriano, please let me know.  

    I am so glad that you finally got this up and running.  
    

Cúráte ut valéatis atque di vos incolumes custodiant,

L. Julia Aquila


Valete!


--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com <mailto:Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com> , "c.aqvillivs_rota" <c.aqvillivs_rota@...> wrote:
>
>
> Salvete Omnes,
>
> I am currently looking for a NR Priest/s and or Priest/esses as well as
> soldiers for the performance of a Roman ritual here in South Carolina!
>
>                                  (One single one would be fine too)
>
> Who is interested or can help out?
>
> Please respond to my e-mail C.Aqvillivs_ Rota@yahoo. com
> <mailto:C.Aqvillivs_Rota@...>
>
> Optime vale
>
> C.AQVILLIVS ROTA
>

  
    

   
  
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62814 From: Titus Flavius Aquila Date: 2009-04-09
Subject: AW: [Nova-Roma] Re: NR Disaster Relief Fund / Emergency fund
Salve Rutilia,
 
according to my recommendation for establishing an emergency fund, I have it already on the list I will present to the consules for kindly consideration to adding it to the agenda for the next senate session.
 
Thank you for your support
 
Vale bene
Titus Flavius Aquila


Von: enodia2002 <walkyr@...>
An: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Gesendet: Donnerstag, den 9. April 2009, 05:32:30 Uhr
Betreff: [Nova-Roma] Re: NR Disaster Relief Fund

Salve,

Thank you, I was indeed misinformed as to the status of the MM project. It would be wonderful to get something like that underway.

In that case we would need to set up an entirely new fund for disaster relief, and I amend my request to that formal effort.

Vale,

Rutilia

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com, Gnaeus Equitius Marinus <gawne@...> wrote:
>
> Salve Rutilia,
>
> enodia2002 <walkyr@...> writes:
>
> > V. Rutilia SPD
>
> > It's my understanding that at one time funds were raised for an
> > archeological project that later foundered and the funds remain.
>
> If you're thinking about the Magna Mater project, you've been
> misinformed. While it has not gone as far as I and many others wish,
> it is not dead. Funds raised for the Magna Mater project remain
> dedicated to that project, especially since they were donated
> explicitly for that project and not to the Nova Roma general fund.
>
> I would not oppose an effort to make a one-time donation from the Nova
> Roma treasury to a reputable disaster relief agency in Italy for
> earthquake relief. In fact I might well donate to it. But that's a
> very different thing from redirecting funds that have already been
> designated for another purpose.
>
> Vale,
>
> CN-EQVIT-MARINVS
>


Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62815 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2009-04-09
Subject: Re: Exposing Senate Acts of Illegality!
Ave,

I am extremely glad that some of the information is starting to get reported to the People. I think it is incumbent on the People of Nova Roma to be aware of the words and actions of the Presiding Magistrates of Nova Roma - those that have the power to summon the Senate. I believe it would be beneficial to release specific messages to the review of the People of Nova Roma regarding the now disclosed adjourned Board of Director Meeting earlier this month. Do you know the agenda of the meeting? Do you know why it was adjourned? Do you know what transpired to cause the adjournment? So far to date this has gone completely unreported. Why?

Other issues should also be discussed - not just in the Senate but here where the people can voice their opinions and concerns as well. Where is the transparency? Where is the accountability? Our Consul speaks of Obstructionism and Filibustering. Yet, the ML is totally silent on many issues! Why is that? I hope that more information will be released - either in summary form or in a post by post release. The time for transparency is now!

Those of us on the Back Alley (who the Consuls would call obstructionists/filibusters) have been at the forefront in trying to have more transparency in Nova Roma. I think it is now incumbent for this message to reach the Main List! You are the People of Nova Roma. You have a right to ask your magistrates what is going on! You have a right to demand to know what actions are going on! Speak up Nova Roma! You have no idea what has been going on and you have a a responsibility to know!!!! You should demand your right to know what has been transpiring!

Respectfully,

Lucius Cornelius Sulla Felix

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "galerius_of_rome" <galerius_of_rome@...> wrote:
>
> Save et salvete,Greetings and salutations ,Fellow Romans.From time to time it is the duty of the Tribunate of the Plebian Order to post observations on the functioning and the actions of those who have been elected as our representatives in the Senate and upper echelons of our government.Especially now on the eve of a new elections.So therefore I wish to tender a report for the benefit of your knowledge, of the actual goings on, of some of our officials, as I feel my duty to do so.Also, I am not making suggestions as to how you should vote.Only to know your candidates and to choose wisely.As it stands at the present time, there are some very disturbing sounds eminating from the Senate of Nova Roma.Some of these things would threaten the rights of the people and consequently diminish the role, of the individual Roman citizen to be able to have the representation, that is called for in our Constitution.I site for one instance that it
> has been discussed, just how to eliminate the Tribunate of the Plebians and to secure the unrivaled power of Consulship.This sounds like an attempted coup attempt, to usurp the rights of the average Roman citizen.Not only are the many debates about subjects which are close to if not downright in total regard for the laws of Nova Roma.Meetings ajourned because no one can agree on anything.With much conduct unbecoming of any official.Profanity and angry indignation among the participants.The questioning of the intelligence of our fine webmaster, who has replaced our last, one run off by the same type of condecending behavior.Making deals and agreements without consulting the people.And the list goes on ad nauseum.A true theatre of the absurd.If it were possible, I would call upon the citizens of our Republic to place a no confidence vote on this group of elected officials, who should be made to explain, these actions to the people or risk re-call.I
> hope that others will step forward without fear to tell our citizens their individual experiences.I call upon my colleagues in the Tribunate to speak out knowing full well the truth of this situation.To all citizens who will stand up for their rights for proper representation as provided by our Constitution and our Lex.
>
> Vale et valete,
> Ap.Galerius Aurelianus
> Tribune of the Plebs
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62816 From: Lucius Coruncanius Cato Date: 2009-04-09
Subject: Re: AW: [Nova-Roma] Re: NR Disaster Relief Fund / Emergency fund
Salvete omnes,

in addition to that, if I might, I would suggest a 'quick response' action, for example make a donation to the Italian Red Cross for the actual quake's relief asap (and by this I mean forgetting for a minute all quarrels in the Senate).

About the proposal for establishing an emergency fund, these are my two cents (if they aren't already considered yet by Aquila) for anyone wishing to take them to the Senate:

1.the fund's purpose should be directed to help and relief NR cives in case of a natural disaster.

2. if no NR cives where affected directly, the Senate should decide the best way to use it (international orgs like Red Cross, etc) or not to use it at all.

3. In any case, the use of the fund would be public and well known to the people (not only within NR, but also to the beneficiary/ies and so) in a way that shows clearly that NR is making the action.

4. the fund should be fed by a n% of NR cives taxpaying (individual and those coming directly from province governors), individual donations (public or private), and/or any other way the Senate might find appropriate.

5. for this purpose, at least two accounts should be set up. One within US borders, so NR cives living there can enjoy tax deductions if they want, and another one within EU borders, so NR cives in EU might do the same (I think this last one might require some bureaucracy). Other accounts might be set up, if needed, for other cives in other parts of the world (south america, etc...). This makes available propper tax deduction for donnors anywhere they come from, and quicker responses when a transfer is needed (moving money from one side of an ocean to another is a lot of paperwork and there is the possibility of central banks' kidnapping of the sum under suspect of it being 'dirty money')

As I said, these are my humble five cents.

--
Di te incolumem custodiant.
L. Coruncanius Cato

--- El jue, 9/4/09, Titus Flavius Aquila <titus.aquila@...> escribió:
De: Titus Flavius Aquila <titus.aquila@...>
Asunto: AW: [Nova-Roma] Re: NR Disaster Relief Fund / Emergency fund
Para: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
CC: walkyr@...
Fecha: jueves, 9 abril, 2009 7:56

Salve Rutilia,
 
according to my recommendation for establishing an emergency fund, I have it already on the list I will present to the consules for kindly consideration to adding it to the agenda for the next senate session.
 
Thank you for your support
 
Vale bene
Titus Flavius Aquila


Von: enodia2002 <walkyr@...>
An: Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com
Gesendet: Donnerstag, den 9. April 2009, 05:32:30 Uhr
Betreff: [Nova-Roma] Re: NR Disaster Relief Fund

Salve,

Thank you, I was indeed misinformed as to the status of the MM project. It would be wonderful to get something like that underway.

In that case we would need to set up an entirely new fund for disaster relief, and I amend my request to that formal effort.

Vale,

Rutilia

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com, Gnaeus Equitius Marinus <gawne@...> wrote:
>
> Salve Rutilia,
>
> enodia2002 <walkyr@...> writes:
>
> > V. Rutilia SPD
>
> > It's my understanding that at one time funds were raised for an
> > archeological project that later foundered and the funds remain.
>
> If you're thinking about the Magna Mater project, you've been
> misinformed. While it has not gone as far as I and many others wish,
> it is not dead. Funds raised for the Magna Mater project remain
> dedicated to that project, especially since they were donated
> explicitly for that project and not to the Nova Roma general fund.
>
> I would not oppose an effort to make a one-time donation from the Nova
> Roma treasury to a reputable disaster relief agency in Italy for
> earthquake relief. In fact I might well donate to it. But that's a
> very different thing from redirecting funds that have already been
> designated for another purpose.
>
> Vale,
>
> CN-EQVIT-MARINVS
>



Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62817 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2009-04-09
Subject: a.d. V Id. Apr.
Cato omnibus in foro SPD

Salvete!

Hodiernus dies est ante diem V Idus Aprilis; haec ies nefastus est.

"But before the last day completes the spectacle,
Orion with his sword will have sunk in the sea." - Ovid, Fast IV

"Orion...was the son of Euryale, the daughter of Minos, and of Poseidon, and that there was given him as a gift the power of walking upon the waves as though upon land. When he was come to Khios, he outraged Merope, the daughter of Oinopion, being drunken; but Oinopion when he learned of it was greatly vexed at the outrage and blinded him and cast him out of the country. Then he came to Lemnos as a beggar and there met Hephaistos who took pity on him and gave him Kedalion his own servant to guide him. So Orion took Kedalion upon his shoulders and used to carry him about while he pointed out the roads. Then he came to the east and appears to have met Helios and to have been healed, and so returned back again to Oinopion to punish him; but Oinopion was hidden away by his people underground. Being disappointed, then, in his search for the king, Orion went away to Krete and spent his time hunting in company with Artemis and Leto. It seems that he threatened to kill every beast there was on earth; whereupon, in her anger, the Earth sent up against him a Scorpion of very great size by which he was stung and so perished. After this Zeus, at the prayer of Artemis and Leto, put him among the stars, because of his manliness, and the Scorpion also as a memorial of him and of what had occurred." - Hesiod, Astronomy Fragment IV

Today is the sixth and last day of the Megalesia in honor of the Magna
Mater.

"Wherefore great mother of gods, and mother of beasts,
And parent of man hath she alone been named.
Her hymned the old and learned bards of Greece.
Seated in chariot o'er the realms of air
To drive her team of lions, teaching thus
That the great earth hangs poised and cannot lie
Resting on other earth. Unto her car
They've yoked the wild beasts, since a progeny,
However savage, must be tamed and chid
By care of parents. They have girt about
With turret-crown the summit of her head,
Since, fortressed in her goodly strongholds high,
'Tis she sustains the cities; now, adorned
With that same token, to-day is carried forth,
With solemn awe through many a mighty land,
The image of that mother, the divine.
Her the wide nations, after antique rite,
Do name Idaean Mother, giving her
Escort of Phrygian bands, since first, they say,
From out those regions 'twas that grain began
Through all the world. To her do they assign
The Galli, the emasculate, since thus
They wish to show that men who violate
The majesty of the mother and have proved
Ingrate to parents are to be adjudged
Unfit to give unto the shores of light
A living progeny. The Galli come:
And hollow cymbals, tight-skinned tambourines
Resound around to bangings of their hands;
The fierce horns threaten with a raucous bray;
The tubed pipe excites their maddened minds
In Phrygian measures; they bear before them knives,
Wild emblems of their frenzy, which have power
The rabble's ingrate heads and impious hearts
To panic with terror of the goddess' might.
And so, when through the mighty cities borne,
She blesses man with salutations mute,
They strew the highway of her journeyings
With coin of brass and silver, gifting her
With alms and largesse, and shower her and shade
With flowers of roses falling like the snow
Upon the Mother and her companion-bands.
Here is an armed troop, the which by Greeks
Are called the Phrygian Curetes. Since
Haply among themselves they use to play
In games of arms and leap in measure round
With bloody mirth and by their nodding shake
The terrorizing crests upon their heads,
This is the armed troop that represents
The arm'd Dictaean Curetes, who, in Crete,
As runs the story, whilom did out-drown
That infant cry of Zeus, what time their band,
Young boys, in a swift dance around the boy,
To measured step beat with the brass on brass,
That Saturn might not get him for his jaws,
And give its mother an eternal wound
Along her heart. And it is on this account
That armed they escort the mighty Mother,
Or else because they signify by this
That she, the goddess, teaches men to be
Eager with armed valour to defend
Their motherland, and ready to stand forth,
The guard and glory of their parents' years." - Lucretius, De Rerum
Naturae

Valete bene,

Cato
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62818 From: vallenporter Date: 2009-04-09
Subject: Re: NR Disaster Relief Fund / Emergency fund
--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Lucius Coruncanius Cato <l.coruncanius_cato@...> wrote:
>
> Salvete omnes,
>
> in addition to that, if I might, I would suggest a 'quick response' action, for example make a donation to the Italian Red Cross for the actual quake's relief asap (and by this I mean forgetting for a minute all quarrels in the Senate).
>
> About the proposal for establishing an emergency fund, these are my two cents (if they aren't already considered yet by Aquila) for anyone wishing to take them to the Senate:
>
> 1.the fund's purpose should be directed to help and relief NR cives in case of a natural disaster.
>
> 2. if no NR cives where affected directly, the Senate should decide the best way to use it (international orgs like Red Cross, etc) or not to use it at all.
>
> 3. In any case, the use of the fund would be public and well known to the people (not only within NR, but also to the beneficiary/ies and so) in a way that shows clearly that NR is making the action.
>
> 4. the fund should be fed by a n% of NR cives taxpaying (individual and
> those coming directly from province governors), individual donations (public or private), and/or any other way the Senate might find appropriate.
>
> 5. for this purpose, at least two accounts should be set up. One within US
> borders, so NR cives living there can enjoy tax deductions if they
> want, and another one within EU borders, so NR cives in EU might do the
> same (I think this last one might require some bureaucracy). Other accounts might be set up, if needed, for other cives in
> other parts of the world (south america, etc...). This makes available
> propper tax deduction for donnors anywhere they come from, and quicker
> responses when a transfer is needed (moving money from one side of an
> ocean to another is a lot of paperwork and there is the possibility of
> central banks' kidnapping of the sum under suspect of it being 'dirty
> money')

Salve

As we are not in the EU as a legal ORG how do we as NR get a bank acct?to get "propper tax deduction for donnors" we as NR INC have to file a lot of paperwork in the EU as far as I know.we shoul;d look into thsi.
I think that to set up a bank acct not in NR names that just sends funds to the red cross NO tax deduction would be much faster.
TPTB should talk with our in house CFO.As that would be the one of the Officer of NR would would under the US Law would have to sign off on this whole things.
mind you I think a NR Disaster Relief Fund would be nice.

Vale
Marcus Cornelius felix

Sacerdos Templi Mercurius









>
> As I said, these are my humble five cents.
>
> --
>
> Di te incolumem custodiant.
>
> L. Coruncanius Cato
>
> --- El jue, 9/4/09, Titus Flavius Aquila <titus.aquila@...> escribió:
> De: Titus Flavius Aquila <titus.aquila@...>
> Asunto: AW: [Nova-Roma] Re: NR Disaster Relief Fund / Emergency fund
> Para: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> CC: walkyr@...
> Fecha: jueves, 9 abril, 2009 7:56
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Salve Rutilia,
>  
> according to my recommendation for establishing an emergency fund, I have it already on the list I will present to the consules for kindly consideration to adding it to the agenda for the next senate session.
>  
> Thank you for your support
>  
> Vale bene
> Titus Flavius Aquila
>
>
>
>
>
> Von: enodia2002 <walkyr@...>
> An: Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com
> Gesendet: Donnerstag, den 9. April 2009, 05:32:30 Uhr
> Betreff: [Nova-Roma] Re: NR Disaster Relief Fund
>
>
>
> Salve,
>
> Thank you, I was indeed misinformed as to the status of the MM project. It would be wonderful to get something like that underway.
>
> In that case we would need to set up an entirely new fund for disaster relief, and I amend my request to that formal effort.
>
> Vale,
>
> Rutilia
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com, Gnaeus Equitius Marinus <gawne@> wrote:
> >
> > Salve Rutilia,
> >
> > enodia2002 <walkyr@> writes:
> >
> > > V. Rutilia SPD
> >
> > > It's my understanding that at one time funds were raised for an
> > > archeological project that later foundered and the funds remain.
> >
> > If you're thinking about the Magna Mater project, you've been
> > misinformed. While it has not gone as far as I and many others wish,
>
> > it is not dead. Funds raised for the Magna Mater project remain
> > dedicated to that project, especially since they were donated
> > explicitly for that project and not to the Nova Roma general fund.
> >
> > I would not oppose an effort to make a one-time donation from the Nova
> > Roma treasury to a reputable disaster relief agency in Italy for
> > earthquake relief. In fact I might well donate to it. But that's a
> > very different thing from redirecting funds that have already been
> > designated for another purpose.
> >
> > Vale,
> >
> > CN-EQVIT-MARINVS
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62819 From: Lucius Coruncanius Cato Date: 2009-04-09
Subject: Re: Exposing Senate Acts of Illegality!
Salvete omnes,

Well, throwing suspicions of this size whilst not saying exactly what the accusations and the responsibles (wow, yes, 'magistrates'. This gives a wide range of people) of them is not precisely a sign of "transparency".
And yes, the list is silent... except for the blind accusations thrown to the list by 5 people acting just like trolls/filibusters: breaking all dialogue first, and then demanding transparency and dialogue but, after that, keeping to throw blind accusations and encouraging the people to ask (by the way, encouraging us to do your work, senators).

First it was about elections. When elections are called, it comes "acts of illegality". What acts are these? By whom exactly? Why keeping this harassment and obstruction to any action taken by the magistrates?
If you know so much of the information, why you are not releasing it? Why a Tribune of Plebs throwns this blind accusation, and after "hopes the other tribunes to tell the truth to the citizens"?

As you requested, I am asking you, senator, and you, tribune.

Speak sense, please.

--

Di te incolumem custodiant.

L. Coruncanius Cato

--- El jue, 9/4/09, Robert Woolwine <l_cornelius_sulla@...> escribió:
 






Ave,



I am extremely glad that some of the information is starting to get reported to the People. I think it is incumbent on the People of Nova Roma to be aware of the words and actions of the Presiding Magistrates of Nova Roma - those that have the power to summon the Senate. I believe it would be beneficial to release specific messages to the review of the People of Nova Roma regarding the now disclosed adjourned Board of Director Meeting earlier this month. Do you know the agenda of the meeting? Do you know why it was adjourned? Do you know what transpired to cause the adjournment? So far to date this has gone completely unreported. Why?



Other issues should also be discussed - not just in the Senate but here where the people can voice their opinions and concerns as well. Where is the transparency? Where is the accountability? Our Consul speaks of Obstructionism and Filibustering. Yet, the ML is totally silent on many issues! Why is that? I hope that more information will be released - either in summary form or in a post by post release. The time for transparency is now!



Those of us on the Back Alley (who the Consuls would call obstructionists/ filibusters) have been at the forefront in trying to have more transparency in Nova Roma. I think it is now incumbent for this message to reach the Main List! You are the People of Nova Roma. You have a right to ask your magistrates what is going on! You have a right to demand to know what actions are going on! Speak up Nova Roma! You have no idea what has been going on and you have a a responsibility to know!!!! You should demand your right to know what has been transpiring!



Respectfully,



Lucius Cornelius Sulla Felix



--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com, "galerius_of_ rome" <galerius_of_ rome@...> wrote:

>

> Save et salvete,Greetings and salutations ,Fellow Romans.From time to time it is the duty of the Tribunate of the Plebian Order to post observations on the functioning and the actions of those who have been elected as our representatives in the Senate and upper echelons of our government.Especial ly now on the eve of a new elections.So therefore I wish to tender a report for the benefit of your knowledge, of the actual goings on, of some of our officials, as I feel my duty to do so.Also, I am not making suggestions as to how you should vote.Only to know your candidates and to choose wisely.As it stands at the present time, there are some very disturbing sounds eminating from the Senate of Nova Roma.Some of these things would threaten the rights of the people and consequently diminish the role, of the individual Roman citizen to be able to have the representation, that is called for in our Constitution. I site for one instance that it

> has been discussed, just how to eliminate the Tribunate of the Plebians and to secure the unrivaled power of Consulship.This sounds like an attempted coup attempt, to usurp the rights of the average Roman citizen.Not only are the many debates about subjects which are close to if not downright in total regard for the laws of Nova Roma.Meetings ajourned because no one can agree on anything.With much conduct unbecoming of any official.Profanity and angry indignation among the participants. The questioning of the intelligence of our fine webmaster, who has replaced our last, one run off by the same type of condecending behavior.Making deals and agreements without consulting the people.And the list goes on ad nauseum.A true theatre of the absurd.If it were possible, I would call upon the citizens of our Republic to place a no confidence vote on this group of elected officials, who should be made to explain, these actions to the people or risk re-call.I

> hope that others will step forward without fear to tell our citizens their individual experiences. I call upon my colleagues in the Tribunate to speak out knowing full well the truth of this situation.To all citizens who will stand up for their rights for proper representation as provided by our Constitution and our Lex.

>

> Vale et valete,

> Ap.Galerius Aurelianus

> Tribune of the Plebs

>



























Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62820 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2009-04-09
Subject: Re: Exposing Senate Acts of Illegality!
Cato Coruncanio Catoni sal.

Salve.

Well, if the tribune feels that the People should be more informed about what he sees going on in the Senate, he is certainly right to express that.

Not even taking into consideration your "Gang of Five", exactly how many people need to exhibit concern before it is a "valid" complaint, in your mind? Do you understand what a filibuster is? Because the consul who posted that article used the term incorrectly; you are doing that now as well.

At any rate, we will soon see what the tribune has to say. I say good for him. Those who have nothing to fear do not care if doors and windows are opened, curtains drawn back to shed light.

Vale,

Cato


--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Lucius Coruncanius Cato <l.coruncanius_cato@...> wrote:
>
> Salvete omnes,
>
> Well, throwing suspicions of this size whilst not saying exactly what the accusations and the responsibles (wow, yes, 'magistrates'. This gives a wide range of people) of them is not precisely a sign of "transparency".
> And yes, the list is silent... except for the blind accusations thrown to the list by 5 people acting just like trolls/filibusters: breaking all dialogue first, and then demanding transparency and dialogue but, after that, keeping to throw blind accusations and encouraging the people to ask (by the way, encouraging us to do your work, senators).
>
> First it was about elections. When elections are called, it comes "acts of illegality". What acts are these? By whom exactly? Why keeping this harassment and obstruction to any action taken by the magistrates?
> If you know so much of the information, why you are not releasing it? Why a Tribune of Plebs throwns this blind accusation, and after "hopes the other tribunes to tell the truth to the citizens"?
>
> As you requested, I am asking you, senator, and you, tribune.
>
> Speak sense, please.
>
> --
>
> Di te incolumem custodiant.
>
> L. Coruncanius Cato
>
> --- El jue, 9/4/09, Robert Woolwine <l_cornelius_sulla@...> escribió:
>  
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Ave,
>
>
>
> I am extremely glad that some of the information is starting to get reported to the People. I think it is incumbent on the People of Nova Roma to be aware of the words and actions of the Presiding Magistrates of Nova Roma - those that have the power to summon the Senate. I believe it would be beneficial to release specific messages to the review of the People of Nova Roma regarding the now disclosed adjourned Board of Director Meeting earlier this month. Do you know the agenda of the meeting? Do you know why it was adjourned? Do you know what transpired to cause the adjournment? So far to date this has gone completely unreported. Why?
>
>
>
> Other issues should also be discussed - not just in the Senate but here where the people can voice their opinions and concerns as well. Where is the transparency? Where is the accountability? Our Consul speaks of Obstructionism and Filibustering. Yet, the ML is totally silent on many issues! Why is that? I hope that more information will be released - either in summary form or in a post by post release. The time for transparency is now!
>
>
>
> Those of us on the Back Alley (who the Consuls would call obstructionists/ filibusters) have been at the forefront in trying to have more transparency in Nova Roma. I think it is now incumbent for this message to reach the Main List! You are the People of Nova Roma. You have a right to ask your magistrates what is going on! You have a right to demand to know what actions are going on! Speak up Nova Roma! You have no idea what has been going on and you have a a responsibility to know!!!! You should demand your right to know what has been transpiring!
>
>
>
> Respectfully,
>
>
>
> Lucius Cornelius Sulla Felix
>
>
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com, "galerius_of_ rome" <galerius_of_ rome@> wrote:
>
> >
>
> > Save et salvete,Greetings and salutations ,Fellow Romans.From time to time it is the duty of the Tribunate of the Plebian Order to post observations on the functioning and the actions of those who have been elected as our representatives in the Senate and upper echelons of our government.Especial ly now on the eve of a new elections.So therefore I wish to tender a report for the benefit of your knowledge, of the actual goings on, of some of our officials, as I feel my duty to do so.Also, I am not making suggestions as to how you should vote.Only to know your candidates and to choose wisely.As it stands at the present time, there are some very disturbing sounds eminating from the Senate of Nova Roma.Some of these things would threaten the rights of the people and consequently diminish the role, of the individual Roman citizen to be able to have the representation, that is called for in our Constitution. I site for one instance that it
>
> > has been discussed, just how to eliminate the Tribunate of the Plebians and to secure the unrivaled power of Consulship.This sounds like an attempted coup attempt, to usurp the rights of the average Roman citizen.Not only are the many debates about subjects which are close to if not downright in total regard for the laws of Nova Roma.Meetings ajourned because no one can agree on anything.With much conduct unbecoming of any official.Profanity and angry indignation among the participants. The questioning of the intelligence of our fine webmaster, who has replaced our last, one run off by the same type of condecending behavior.Making deals and agreements without consulting the people.And the list goes on ad nauseum.A true theatre of the absurd.If it were possible, I would call upon the citizens of our Republic to place a no confidence vote on this group of elected officials, who should be made to explain, these actions to the people or risk re-call.I
>
> > hope that others will step forward without fear to tell our citizens their individual experiences. I call upon my colleagues in the Tribunate to speak out knowing full well the truth of this situation.To all citizens who will stand up for their rights for proper representation as provided by our Constitution and our Lex.
>
> >
>
> > Vale et valete,
>
> > Ap.Galerius Aurelianus
>
> > Tribune of the Plebs
>
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62821 From: gaiuspopilliuslaenas Date: 2009-04-09
Subject: Re: Exposing Senate Acts of Illegality!
Laenas Cato sal.

The Tribune has exceeded his reporting responsibilities and he has done a dsservice to Nova Roma with the title of his post and making accusations without any evidence or specifics.

I expect the Censors to post something on this matter soon.

Vale bene.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62822 From: livia_plauta Date: 2009-04-09
Subject: Re: Exposing Senate Acts of Illegality!
Salvete omnes,
the way things are, I can just join in Coruncanius' plea: please speak sense!

Galerius' post was more obscure than the things he pretended to explain.

Maybe someone will care to report exactly what happened?

Valete,
Livia

>
> Salvete omnes,
>
> Well, throwing suspicions of this size whilst not saying exactly what the accusations and the responsibles (wow, yes, 'magistrates'. This gives a wide range of people) of them is not precisely a sign of "transparency".
> And yes, the list is silent... except for the blind accusations thrown to the list by 5 people acting just like trolls/filibusters: breaking all dialogue first, and then demanding transparency and dialogue but, after that, keeping to throw blind accusations and encouraging the people to ask (by the way, encouraging us to do your work, senators).
>
> First it was about elections. When elections are called, it comes "acts of illegality". What acts are these? By whom exactly? Why keeping this harassment and obstruction to any action taken by the magistrates?
> If you know so much of the information, why you are not releasing it? Why a Tribune of Plebs throwns this blind accusation, and after "hopes the other tribunes to tell the truth to the citizens"?
>
> As you requested, I am asking you, senator, and you, tribune.
>
> Speak sense, please.
>
> --
>
> Di te incolumem custodiant.
>
> L. Coruncanius Cato
>
> --- El jue, 9/4/09, Robert Woolwine <l_cornelius_sulla@...> escribió:
>  
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Ave,
>
>
>
> I am extremely glad that some of the information is starting to get reported to the People. I think it is incumbent on the People of Nova Roma to be aware of the words and actions of the Presiding Magistrates of Nova Roma - those that have the power to summon the Senate. I believe it would be beneficial to release specific messages to the review of the People of Nova Roma regarding the now disclosed adjourned Board of Director Meeting earlier this month. Do you know the agenda of the meeting? Do you know why it was adjourned? Do you know what transpired to cause the adjournment? So far to date this has gone completely unreported. Why?
>
>
>
> Other issues should also be discussed - not just in the Senate but here where the people can voice their opinions and concerns as well. Where is the transparency? Where is the accountability? Our Consul speaks of Obstructionism and Filibustering. Yet, the ML is totally silent on many issues! Why is that? I hope that more information will be released - either in summary form or in a post by post release. The time for transparency is now!
>
>
>
> Those of us on the Back Alley (who the Consuls would call obstructionists/ filibusters) have been at the forefront in trying to have more transparency in Nova Roma. I think it is now incumbent for this message to reach the Main List! You are the People of Nova Roma. You have a right to ask your magistrates what is going on! You have a right to demand to know what actions are going on! Speak up Nova Roma! You have no idea what has been going on and you have a a responsibility to know!!!! You should demand your right to know what has been transpiring!
>
>
>
> Respectfully,
>
>
>
> Lucius Cornelius Sulla Felix
>
>
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com, "galerius_of_ rome" <galerius_of_ rome@> wrote:
>
> >
>
> > Save et salvete,Greetings and salutations ,Fellow Romans.From time to time it is the duty of the Tribunate of the Plebian Order to post observations on the functioning and the actions of those who have been elected as our representatives in the Senate and upper echelons of our government.Especial ly now on the eve of a new elections.So therefore I wish to tender a report for the benefit of your knowledge, of the actual goings on, of some of our officials, as I feel my duty to do so.Also, I am not making suggestions as to how you should vote.Only to know your candidates and to choose wisely.As it stands at the present time, there are some very disturbing sounds eminating from the Senate of Nova Roma.Some of these things would threaten the rights of the people and consequently diminish the role, of the individual Roman citizen to be able to have the representation, that is called for in our Constitution. I site for one instance that it
>
> > has been discussed, just how to eliminate the Tribunate of the Plebians and to secure the unrivaled power of Consulship.This sounds like an attempted coup attempt, to usurp the rights of the average Roman citizen.Not only are the many debates about subjects which are close to if not downright in total regard for the laws of Nova Roma.Meetings ajourned because no one can agree on anything.With much conduct unbecoming of any official.Profanity and angry indignation among the participants. The questioning of the intelligence of our fine webmaster, who has replaced our last, one run off by the same type of condecending behavior.Making deals and agreements without consulting the people.And the list goes on ad nauseum.A true theatre of the absurd.If it were possible, I would call upon the citizens of our Republic to place a no confidence vote on this group of elected officials, who should be made to explain, these actions to the people or risk re-call.I
>
> > hope that others will step forward without fear to tell our citizens their individual experiences. I call upon my colleagues in the Tribunate to speak out knowing full well the truth of this situation.To all citizens who will stand up for their rights for proper representation as provided by our Constitution and our Lex.
>
> >
>
> > Vale et valete,
>
> > Ap.Galerius Aurelianus
>
> > Tribune of the Plebs
>
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62823 From: Gnaeus Iulius Caesar Date: 2009-04-09
Subject: Ludi Megalenses: Certamen Historicum - Day 4 & 5
Cn. Iulius Caesar aedilis curulis, omnibus Quiritibus sal.

Below are the questions for Day 4 (8th April) and today, Day 5 (9th April). Remember in this Ludi contestants can submit answers to previous day's questions right up until the posted close time/date.

Please note I have extended the close date - it is now at midnight Mountain Time on the 10th/11th April, owning to the surge of late entry contestants.

See here for previous day's questions:

http://novaroma.org/nr/Ludi_Megalenses_2762_AUC_%28Nova_Roma%29

Good luck to all contestants!

Optime valete

Gnaeus Iulius Caesar
Aedilis Curulis
Senator
Legatus pro praetore Canada Ulterioris


RULES:

1. Each correct answer is worth 1 point. An extra point may be awarded for an especially detailed and excellent answer.
2. Answers are to be sent to my e-mail address ( gn_iulius_caesar @ yahoo.com )before 12.01 am MT - Mountain Time (GMT -7hrs / CET -8hrs) April 11th.
3. My decision is final in interpreting what is and what isn't a correct answer.

QUESTIONS - DAY 4 (April 8th)

Q31 What name is the rock associated with Niobe known by on Mount Sipylus?

Q32 Two plants were sacred to Attis, ivy and the evergreen pine. What was the significance of the Evergreen Pine?

Q33 Priests of Cybele who mutilated themselves were known in Rome as what?

Q34 What was the other name for these priests?

Q35 In the year 2000, a temple of Isis and Magna Mater was discovered, along with 300 oil lamps. Where was this?

Q36 The Temple of the Magna Mater in Rome was built between which years?

Q37 How many senators were in the embassy sent to Pessinus to secure the Magna Mater?

Q38 What was the name of the Praetor who inaugurated and dedicated the temple of the Magna Mater?

Q39 What was the ancient Greek title for Cybele?

Q40 What did the "moretum" offering consist of?


QUESTIONS - DAY 5 (April 9th)

Q40 What did the "moretum" offering consist of?

Q41 What was the name of the battle that was fought in the spring of 215 BCE between Hasdrubal Barca and Gnaeus Cornelius Scipio Calvus and Publius Cornelius Scipio?

Q42 On a piece of famous armour the tympanon of Cybele lies at the feet of the goddess Tellus. What is that armour?

Q43 A Vestal Virgin welcomed the arrival of Cybele, along with the Consul. What was her name?

Q44 What could the chief priest of Magna Mater be, if he was not something? What was that something?

Q45 What was the name of the Roman poet who lived 99 BCE- ca. 55 BCE who used Cybele as a metaphor?

Q46 The ship carrying the black stone from Pessinus got stuck in the mud of the Tiber. The Vestal sent to welcome it, used an item to free it. What was it?

Q47 In the Hilaria what occurred on the 24th March?

Q48 Who was the head of the embassy sent to Pessinus to secure the Magna Mater?

Q49 Which philosopher was put to death by his countrymen for trying to introduce the cult of Cybele?

Q50 What was the nature of this philosopher's society that made it antagonistic to Cybele?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62824 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2009-04-09
Subject: Tribune's Report (WAS Re: Exposing SAR)
Cato Popillio Laeno Liviae Plautae SPD

Salve.

Perhaps he could have made the subject line a little less...dramatic, yes you are right (that's why I changed it). But he does have the right to express concerns he may have regarding activities he has witnessed in the Senate.

Livia Plauta, the tribune found some things disturbing in the Senate House recently and he apparently wants to share some of his feelings about them, which is I think well within the power given him by the Constitution:

"To be privy to the debates of the Senate, and keep the citizens informed as to the subjects and results thereof, in such manner and subject to such restrictions as may be defined by law;" (Constitution IV.A.7.d)

As I said earlier, we will see what he has to say.

Vale,

Cato
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62825 From: Q. Valerius Poplicola Date: 2009-04-09
Subject: Re: Exposing Senate Acts of Illegality!
Poplicola omnibus SPD

I'm not a Senator, and therefore I cannot see what wrongs have happened in
the Senate. However, a "filibuster" is the endlessly dragging out of debate
in order to prevent the measure from ever reaching a vote. Alerting the
people to magisterial mishaps is hardly even close to a "filibuster". Also,
trying to kill a debate by claiming it is invalid (not that I'm saying that
this is happening, but in general) is also not filibustering.

Bene ualete.

--------------------------------------------------
From: "Gaius Equitius Cato" <mlcinnyc@...>
Sent: Thursday, April 09, 2009 3:25 PM
To: <Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com>
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Exposing Senate Acts of Illegality!

> Cato Coruncanio Catoni sal.
>
> Salve.
>
> Well, if the tribune feels that the People should be more informed about
> what he sees going on in the Senate, he is certainly right to express
> that.
>
> Not even taking into consideration your "Gang of Five", exactly how many
> people need to exhibit concern before it is a "valid" complaint, in your
> mind? Do you understand what a filibuster is? Because the consul who
> posted that article used the term incorrectly; you are doing that now as
> well.
>
> At any rate, we will soon see what the tribune has to say. I say good for
> him. Those who have nothing to fear do not care if doors and windows are
> opened, curtains drawn back to shed light.
>
> Vale,
>
> Cato
>
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Lucius Coruncanius Cato
> <l.coruncanius_cato@...> wrote:
>>
>> Salvete omnes,
>>
>> Well, throwing suspicions of this size whilst not saying exactly what the
>> accusations and the responsibles (wow, yes, 'magistrates'. This gives a
>> wide range of people) of them is not precisely a sign of "transparency".
>> And yes, the list is silent... except for the blind accusations thrown to
>> the list by 5 people acting just like trolls/filibusters: breaking all
>> dialogue first, and then demanding transparency and dialogue but, after
>> that, keeping to throw blind accusations and encouraging the people to
>> ask (by the way, encouraging us to do your work, senators).
>>
>> First it was about elections. When elections are called, it comes "acts
>> of illegality". What acts are these? By whom exactly? Why keeping this
>> harassment and obstruction to any action taken by the magistrates?
>> If you know so much of the information, why you are not releasing it? Why
>> a Tribune of Plebs throwns this blind accusation, and after "hopes the
>> other tribunes to tell the truth to the citizens"?
>>
>> As you requested, I am asking you, senator, and you, tribune.
>>
>> Speak sense, please.
>>
>> --
>>
>> Di te incolumem custodiant.
>>
>> L. Coruncanius Cato
>>
>> --- El jue, 9/4/09, Robert Woolwine <l_cornelius_sulla@...> escribió:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Ave,
>>
>>
>>
>> I am extremely glad that some of the information is starting to get
>> reported to the People. I think it is incumbent on the People of Nova
>> Roma to be aware of the words and actions of the Presiding Magistrates of
>> Nova Roma - those that have the power to summon the Senate. I believe it
>> would be beneficial to release specific messages to the review of the
>> People of Nova Roma regarding the now disclosed adjourned Board of
>> Director Meeting earlier this month. Do you know the agenda of the
>> meeting? Do you know why it was adjourned? Do you know what transpired
>> to cause the adjournment? So far to date this has gone completely
>> unreported. Why?
>>
>>
>>
>> Other issues should also be discussed - not just in the Senate but here
>> where the people can voice their opinions and concerns as well. Where is
>> the transparency? Where is the accountability? Our Consul speaks of
>> Obstructionism and Filibustering. Yet, the ML is totally silent on many
>> issues! Why is that? I hope that more information will be released -
>> either in summary form or in a post by post release. The time for
>> transparency is now!
>>
>>
>>
>> Those of us on the Back Alley (who the Consuls would call
>> obstructionists/ filibusters) have been at the forefront in trying to
>> have more transparency in Nova Roma. I think it is now incumbent for
>> this message to reach the Main List! You are the People of Nova Roma.
>> You have a right to ask your magistrates what is going on! You have a
>> right to demand to know what actions are going on! Speak up Nova Roma!
>> You have no idea what has been going on and you have a a responsibility
>> to know!!!! You should demand your right to know what has been
>> transpiring!
>>
>>
>>
>> Respectfully,
>>
>>
>>
>> Lucius Cornelius Sulla Felix
>>
>>
>>
>> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com, "galerius_of_ rome" <galerius_of_
>> rome@> wrote:
>>
>> >
>>
>> > Save et salvete,Greetings and salutations ,Fellow Romans.From time to
>> > time it is the duty of the Tribunate of the Plebian Order to post
>> > observations on the functioning and the actions of those who have been
>> > elected as our representatives in the Senate and upper echelons of our
>> > government.Especial ly now on the eve of a new elections.So therefore I
>> > wish to tender a report for the benefit of your knowledge, of the
>> > actual goings on, of some of our officials, as I feel my duty to do
>> > so.Also, I am not making suggestions as to how you should vote.Only to
>> > know your candidates and to choose wisely.As it stands at the present
>> > time, there are some very disturbing sounds eminating from the Senate
>> > of Nova Roma.Some of these things would threaten the rights of the
>> > people and consequently diminish the role, of the individual Roman
>> > citizen to be able to have the representation, that is called for in
>> > our Constitution. I site for one instance that it
>>
>> > has been discussed, just how to eliminate the Tribunate of the Plebians
>> > and to secure the unrivaled power of Consulship.This sounds like an
>> > attempted coup attempt, to usurp the rights of the average Roman
>> > citizen.Not only are the many debates about subjects which are close to
>> > if not downright in total regard for the laws of Nova Roma.Meetings
>> > ajourned because no one can agree on anything.With much conduct
>> > unbecoming of any official.Profanity and angry indignation among the
>> > participants. The questioning of the intelligence of our fine
>> > webmaster, who has replaced our last, one run off by the same type of
>> > condecending behavior.Making deals and agreements without consulting
>> > the people.And the list goes on ad nauseum.A true theatre of the
>> > absurd.If it were possible, I would call upon the citizens of our
>> > Republic to place a no confidence vote on this group of elected
>> > officials, who should be made to explain, these actions to the people
>> > or risk re-call.I
>>
>> > hope that others will step forward without fear to tell our citizens
>> > their individual experiences. I call upon my colleagues in the
>> > Tribunate to speak out knowing full well the truth of this situation.To
>> > all citizens who will stand up for their rights for proper
>> > representation as provided by our Constitution and our Lex.
>>
>> >
>>
>> > Vale et valete,
>>
>> > Ap.Galerius Aurelianus
>>
>> > Tribune of the Plebs
>>
>> >
>>
>
>
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62826 From: D. Aemilus Severus Date: 2009-04-09
Subject: Re: Tribune's Report (WAS Re: Exposing SAR)
Yes, it would be nice if he said something and filled in the blanks.  As a regular citizen I rely on others to fill in the blanks for me regarding certain things.  Please stop being abstract and tell us what has upset you so and how it affects the regular citizen.
 
D. Aemilius Severus

On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 5:52 PM, Gaius Equitius Cato <mlcinnyc@...> wrote:


Cato Popillio Laeno Liviae Plautae SPD

Salve.

Perhaps he could have made the subject line a little less...dramatic, yes you are right (that's why I changed it). But he does have the right to express concerns he may have regarding activities he has witnessed in the Senate.

Livia Plauta, the tribune found some things disturbing in the Senate House recently and he apparently wants to share some of his feelings about them, which is I think well within the power given him by the Constitution:

"To be privy to the debates of the Senate, and keep the citizens informed as to the subjects and results thereof, in such manner and subject to such restrictions as may be defined by law;" (Constitution IV.A.7.d)

As I said earlier, we will see what he has to say.

Vale,

Cato


Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62827 From: Q. Valerius Poplicola Date: 2009-04-09
Subject: Re: Tribune's Report (WAS Re: Exposing SAR)
One of the problems, I think, is the what would constitute "breaking the
seal". It would be unfair to demand stuff from the tribune that he cannot
legally share.

--------------------------------------------------
From: "D. Aemilus Severus" <daemilivssevervs@...>
Sent: Thursday, April 09, 2009 5:23 PM
To: <Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com>
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Tribune's Report (WAS Re: Exposing SAR)

> Yes, it would be nice if he said something and filled in the blanks. As a
> regular citizen I rely on others to fill in the blanks for me regarding
> certain things. Please stop being abstract and tell us what has upset you
> so and how it affects the regular citizen.
>
> D. Aemilius Severus
>
> On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 5:52 PM, Gaius Equitius Cato
> <mlcinnyc@...>wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> Cato Popillio Laeno Liviae Plautae SPD
>>
>> Salve.
>>
>> Perhaps he could have made the subject line a little less...dramatic, yes
>> you are right (that's why I changed it). But he does have the right to
>> express concerns he may have regarding activities he has witnessed in the
>> Senate.
>>
>> Livia Plauta, the tribune found some things disturbing in the Senate
>> House
>> recently and he apparently wants to share some of his feelings about
>> them,
>> which is I think well within the power given him by the Constitution:
>>
>> "To be privy to the debates of the Senate, and keep the citizens informed
>> as to the subjects and results thereof, in such manner and subject to
>> such
>> restrictions as may be defined by law;" (Constitution IV.A.7.d)
>>
>> As I said earlier, we will see what he has to say.
>>
>> Vale,
>>
>> Cato
>>
>>
>>
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62828 From: enodia2002 Date: 2009-04-09
Subject: Re: NR Disaster Relief Fund / Emergency fund
In looking at the 2009 budget I see that there already exists an "Emergency Fund" with $2000 in it. Would the earthquake relief not be an appropriate cause to donate some portion of that to?

V Rutilia





--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "vallenporter" <magewuffa@...> wrote:
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Lucius Coruncanius Cato <l.coruncanius_cato@> wrote:
> >
> > Salvete omnes,
> >
> > in addition to that, if I might, I would suggest a 'quick response' action, for example make a donation to the Italian Red Cross for the actual quake's relief asap (and by this I mean forgetting for a minute all quarrels in the Senate).
> >
> > About the proposal for establishing an emergency fund, these are my two cents (if they aren't already considered yet by Aquila) for anyone wishing to take them to the Senate:
> >
> > 1.the fund's purpose should be directed to help and relief NR cives in case of a natural disaster.
> >
> > 2. if no NR cives where affected directly, the Senate should decide the best way to use it (international orgs like Red Cross, etc) or not to use it at all.
> >
> > 3. In any case, the use of the fund would be public and well known to the people (not only within NR, but also to the beneficiary/ies and so) in a way that shows clearly that NR is making the action.
> >
> > 4. the fund should be fed by a n% of NR cives taxpaying (individual and
> > those coming directly from province governors), individual donations (public or private), and/or any other way the Senate might find appropriate.
> >
> > 5. for this purpose, at least two accounts should be set up. One within US
> > borders, so NR cives living there can enjoy tax deductions if they
> > want, and another one within EU borders, so NR cives in EU might do the
> > same (I think this last one might require some bureaucracy). Other accounts might be set up, if needed, for other cives in
> > other parts of the world (south america, etc...). This makes available
> > propper tax deduction for donnors anywhere they come from, and quicker
> > responses when a transfer is needed (moving money from one side of an
> > ocean to another is a lot of paperwork and there is the possibility of
> > central banks' kidnapping of the sum under suspect of it being 'dirty
> > money')
>
> Salve
>
> As we are not in the EU as a legal ORG how do we as NR get a bank acct?to get "propper tax deduction for donnors" we as NR INC have to file a lot of paperwork in the EU as far as I know.we shoul;d look into thsi.
> I think that to set up a bank acct not in NR names that just sends funds to the red cross NO tax deduction would be much faster.
> TPTB should talk with our in house CFO.As that would be the one of the Officer of NR would would under the US Law would have to sign off on this whole things.
> mind you I think a NR Disaster Relief Fund would be nice.
>
> Vale
> Marcus Cornelius felix
>
> Sacerdos Templi Mercurius
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> >
> > As I said, these are my humble five cents.
> >
> > --
> >
> > Di te incolumem custodiant.
> >
> > L. Coruncanius Cato
> >
> > --- El jue, 9/4/09, Titus Flavius Aquila <titus.aquila@> escribió:
> > De: Titus Flavius Aquila <titus.aquila@>
> > Asunto: AW: [Nova-Roma] Re: NR Disaster Relief Fund / Emergency fund
> > Para: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> > CC: walkyr@
> > Fecha: jueves, 9 abril, 2009 7:56
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Salve Rutilia,
> >  
> > according to my recommendation for establishing an emergency fund, I have it already on the list I will present to the consules for kindly consideration to adding it to the agenda for the next senate session.
> >  
> > Thank you for your support
> >  
> > Vale bene
> > Titus Flavius Aquila
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Von: enodia2002 <walkyr@>
> > An: Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com
> > Gesendet: Donnerstag, den 9. April 2009, 05:32:30 Uhr
> > Betreff: [Nova-Roma] Re: NR Disaster Relief Fund
> >
> >
> >
> > Salve,
> >
> > Thank you, I was indeed misinformed as to the status of the MM project. It would be wonderful to get something like that underway.
> >
> > In that case we would need to set up an entirely new fund for disaster relief, and I amend my request to that formal effort.
> >
> > Vale,
> >
> > Rutilia
> >
> > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com, Gnaeus Equitius Marinus <gawne@> wrote:
> > >
> > > Salve Rutilia,
> > >
> > > enodia2002 <walkyr@> writes:
> > >
> > > > V. Rutilia SPD
> > >
> > > > It's my understanding that at one time funds were raised for an
> > > > archeological project that later foundered and the funds remain.
> > >
> > > If you're thinking about the Magna Mater project, you've been
> > > misinformed. While it has not gone as far as I and many others wish,
> >
> > > it is not dead. Funds raised for the Magna Mater project remain
> > > dedicated to that project, especially since they were donated
> > > explicitly for that project and not to the Nova Roma general fund.
> > >
> > > I would not oppose an effort to make a one-time donation from the Nova
> > > Roma treasury to a reputable disaster relief agency in Italy for
> > > earthquake relief. In fact I might well donate to it. But that's a
> > > very different thing from redirecting funds that have already been
> > > designated for another purpose.
> > >
> > > Vale,
> > >
> > > CN-EQVIT-MARINVS
> > >
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62829 From: Vedius Date: 2009-04-09
Subject: Re: Exposing Senate Acts of Illegality!
The Censors need to be removed as a permanent office and restored to
their 18-months-every-5-year role that they held in ancient Rome. This
constant backseat driving is entirely detrimental, as is their
near-stranglehold on the Senate.

The job of registering new cives can easily be transferred to other
lesser magistracies.

FVG

gaiuspopilliuslaenas wrote:
> Laenas Cato sal.
>
> The Tribune has exceeded his reporting responsibilities and he has done a dsservice to Nova Roma with the title of his post and making accusations without any evidence or specifics.
>
> I expect the Censors to post something on this matter soon.
>
> Vale bene.
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62830 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2009-04-09
Subject: Re: Exposing Senate Acts of Illegality!
Ave,

It was not first about elections - this is the entire point! With all due respect, you have no idea what you are talking about - and that is an unfortunate fact.

The election issue is the ONLY ONE of the issues to hit the ML. There have been a plethora of issues that have gone on without the public being given any notification about. For example the adjourned board meeting - which you left out of your response. Every other Senate / Board of Director meeting has been publicly disclosed - yet that meeting has not. Why not? Do you think that the Consuls are your betters and you should be left in the dark? How Roman is that?

The gang of 5. LOL that is quite witty.

Why don't you ask the Tribune to spell out each issue for more careful analysis before you deign to pass judgment. As the Tribune what are the issues? Or are you saying politics has no place on the ML? I am quite unsure of your logic.

Vale,

Sulla



--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Lucius Coruncanius Cato <l.coruncanius_cato@...> wrote:
>
> Salvete omnes,
>
> Well, throwing suspicions of this size whilst not saying exactly what the accusations and the responsibles (wow, yes, 'magistrates'. This gives a wide range of people) of them is not precisely a sign of "transparency".
> And yes, the list is silent... except for the blind accusations thrown to the list by 5 people acting just like trolls/filibusters: breaking all dialogue first, and then demanding transparency and dialogue but, after that, keeping to throw blind accusations and encouraging the people to ask (by the way, encouraging us to do your work, senators).
>
> First it was about elections. When elections are called, it comes "acts of illegality". What acts are these? By whom exactly? Why keeping this harassment and obstruction to any action taken by the magistrates?
> If you know so much of the information, why you are not releasing it? Why a Tribune of Plebs throwns this blind accusation, and after "hopes the other tribunes to tell the truth to the citizens"?
>
> As you requested, I am asking you, senator, and you, tribune.
>
> Speak sense, please.
>
> --
>
> Di te incolumem custodiant.
>
> L. Coruncanius Cato
>
> --- El jue, 9/4/09, Robert Woolwine <l_cornelius_sulla@...> escribió:
>  
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Ave,
>
>
>
> I am extremely glad that some of the information is starting to get reported to the People. I think it is incumbent on the People of Nova Roma to be aware of the words and actions of the Presiding Magistrates of Nova Roma - those that have the power to summon the Senate. I believe it would be beneficial to release specific messages to the review of the People of Nova Roma regarding the now disclosed adjourned Board of Director Meeting earlier this month. Do you know the agenda of the meeting? Do you know why it was adjourned? Do you know what transpired to cause the adjournment? So far to date this has gone completely unreported. Why?
>
>
>
> Other issues should also be discussed - not just in the Senate but here where the people can voice their opinions and concerns as well. Where is the transparency? Where is the accountability? Our Consul speaks of Obstructionism and Filibustering. Yet, the ML is totally silent on many issues! Why is that? I hope that more information will be released - either in summary form or in a post by post release. The time for transparency is now!
>
>
>
> Those of us on the Back Alley (who the Consuls would call obstructionists/ filibusters) have been at the forefront in trying to have more transparency in Nova Roma. I think it is now incumbent for this message to reach the Main List! You are the People of Nova Roma. You have a right to ask your magistrates what is going on! You have a right to demand to know what actions are going on! Speak up Nova Roma! You have no idea what has been going on and you have a a responsibility to know!!!! You should demand your right to know what has been transpiring!
>
>
>
> Respectfully,
>
>
>
> Lucius Cornelius Sulla Felix
>
>
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com, "galerius_of_ rome" <galerius_of_ rome@> wrote:
>
> >
>
> > Save et salvete,Greetings and salutations ,Fellow Romans.From time to time it is the duty of the Tribunate of the Plebian Order to post observations on the functioning and the actions of those who have been elected as our representatives in the Senate and upper echelons of our government.Especial ly now on the eve of a new elections.So therefore I wish to tender a report for the benefit of your knowledge, of the actual goings on, of some of our officials, as I feel my duty to do so.Also, I am not making suggestions as to how you should vote.Only to know your candidates and to choose wisely.As it stands at the present time, there are some very disturbing sounds eminating from the Senate of Nova Roma.Some of these things would threaten the rights of the people and consequently diminish the role, of the individual Roman citizen to be able to have the representation, that is called for in our Constitution. I site for one instance that it
>
> > has been discussed, just how to eliminate the Tribunate of the Plebians and to secure the unrivaled power of Consulship.This sounds like an attempted coup attempt, to usurp the rights of the average Roman citizen.Not only are the many debates about subjects which are close to if not downright in total regard for the laws of Nova Roma.Meetings ajourned because no one can agree on anything.With much conduct unbecoming of any official.Profanity and angry indignation among the participants. The questioning of the intelligence of our fine webmaster, who has replaced our last, one run off by the same type of condecending behavior.Making deals and agreements without consulting the people.And the list goes on ad nauseum.A true theatre of the absurd.If it were possible, I would call upon the citizens of our Republic to place a no confidence vote on this group of elected officials, who should be made to explain, these actions to the people or risk re-call.I
>
> > hope that others will step forward without fear to tell our citizens their individual experiences. I call upon my colleagues in the Tribunate to speak out knowing full well the truth of this situation.To all citizens who will stand up for their rights for proper representation as provided by our Constitution and our Lex.
>
> >
>
> > Vale et valete,
>
> > Ap.Galerius Aurelianus
>
> > Tribune of the Plebs
>
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62831 From: D. Aemilus Severus Date: 2009-04-09
Subject: Re: Tribune's Report (WAS Re: Exposing SAR)
O.k., fair enough.  Just not sure how to find out info on what they are talking about, so I guess I'll just forget it.
 


 
On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 6:35 PM, Q. Valerius Poplicola <q.valerius.poplicola@...> wrote:


One of the problems, I think, is the what would constitute "breaking the
seal". It would be unfair to demand stuff from the tribune that he cannot
legally share.

--------------------------------------------------
From: "D. Aemilus Severus" <daemilivssevervs@...>
Sent: Thursday, April 09, 2009 5:23 PM
To: <Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com>
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Tribune's Report (WAS Re: Exposing SAR)



> Yes, it would be nice if he said something and filled in the blanks. As a
> regular citizen I rely on others to fill in the blanks for me regarding
> certain things. Please stop being abstract and tell us what has upset you
> so and how it affects the regular citizen.
>
> D. Aemilius Severus
>
> On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 5:52 PM, Gaius Equitius Cato
> <mlcinnyc@...>wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> Cato Popillio Laeno Liviae Plautae SPD
>>
>> Salve.
>>
>> Perhaps he could have made the subject line a little less...dramatic, yes
>> you are right (that's why I changed it). But he does have the right to
>> express concerns he may have regarding activities he has witnessed in the
>> Senate.
>>
>> Livia Plauta, the tribune found some things disturbing in the Senate
>> House
>> recently and he apparently wants to share some of his feelings about
>> them,
>> which is I think well within the power given him by the Constitution:
>>
>> "To be privy to the debates of the Senate, and keep the citizens informed
>> as to the subjects and results thereof, in such manner and subject to
>> such
>> restrictions as may be defined by law;" (Constitution IV.A.7.d)
>>
>> As I said earlier, we will see what he has to say.
>>
>> Vale,
>>
>> Cato
>>
>>
>>
>


Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62832 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2009-04-09
Subject: Tribune's Report (WAS Re: Exposing SAR)
Cato Aemilio Severo Valerio Poplicolo omnibusque in foro SPD

Salvete.

As I mentioned earlier, I believe it is well within the tribunes' Constitutional power to discuss any issues that they feel have an impact on the People and the State. This whole concept of their being a legal so-called "seal" on the Senate is entirely fictitious as far as I can tell. But I'm still looking :)

Valete,

Cato




--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "D. Aemilus Severus" <daemilivssevervs@...> wrote:
>
> O.k., fair enough. Just not sure how to find out info on what they are
> talking about, so I guess I'll just forget it.
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 6:35 PM, Q. Valerius Poplicola <
> q.valerius.poplicola@...> wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > One of the problems, I think, is the what would constitute "breaking the
> > seal". It would be unfair to demand stuff from the tribune that he cannot
> > legally share.
> >
> > --------------------------------------------------
> > From: "D. Aemilus Severus" <daemilivssevervs@...<daemilivssevervs%40gmail.com>
> > >
> > Sent: Thursday, April 09, 2009 5:23 PM
> > To: <Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com <Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com>>
> > Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Tribune's Report (WAS Re: Exposing SAR)
> >
> >
> > > Yes, it would be nice if he said something and filled in the blanks. As a
> > > regular citizen I rely on others to fill in the blanks for me regarding
> > > certain things. Please stop being abstract and tell us what has upset you
> > > so and how it affects the regular citizen.
> > >
> > > D. Aemilius Severus
> > >
> > > On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 5:52 PM, Gaius Equitius Cato
> > > <mlcinnyc@... <mlcinnyc%40gmail.com>>wrote:
> > >
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> Cato Popillio Laeno Liviae Plautae SPD
> > >>
> > >> Salve.
> > >>
> > >> Perhaps he could have made the subject line a little less...dramatic,
> > yes
> > >> you are right (that's why I changed it). But he does have the right to
> > >> express concerns he may have regarding activities he has witnessed in
> > the
> > >> Senate.
> > >>
> > >> Livia Plauta, the tribune found some things disturbing in the Senate
> > >> House
> > >> recently and he apparently wants to share some of his feelings about
> > >> them,
> > >> which is I think well within the power given him by the Constitution:
> > >>
> > >> "To be privy to the debates of the Senate, and keep the citizens
> > informed
> > >> as to the subjects and results thereof, in such manner and subject to
> > >> such
> > >> restrictions as may be defined by law;" (Constitution IV.A.7.d)
> > >>
> > >> As I said earlier, we will see what he has to say.
> > >>
> > >> Vale,
> > >>
> > >> Cato
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >
> >
> >
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62833 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2009-04-09
Subject: Re: Tribune's Report (WAS Re: Exposing SAR)
Re: [Nova-Roma] Tribune's Report (WAS Re: Exposing SAR)

  
A. Tullia Scholastica Q. Valerio Poplicolae quiritibus bonae voluntatis S.P.D.
  

One of the problems, I think, is the what would constitute "breaking the
seal". It would be unfair to demand stuff from the tribune that he cannot
legally share.

    ATS:  Indeed, and moreover, virtually all of this is the product of a hyperactive imagination, while the rest may be a matter of interpretation.  It is also not the tribunes’ right to discuss the deliberations in curia, only to report the votes; he has exceeded his mandate here.  Sat sapienti verbum.  

    Poplicola, de avibus mortuis quas vidisti:  cujus color erant?  T. americanus/T. migratorius (robin) est avis mediae magnitudinis; passeres aliaeque multae parvae, et minores T. americanis sunt.  Si omnino nigrae et plumae irides continere videbantur, erant graeculi, quae ova et interdum pullos aliarum avium edunt (et sua invicem corvis eduntur).  Si melius has aves describere depingereve possis, fortasse nomina tibi dare possim.  

Vale, et valete.  

--------------------------------------------------
From: "D. Aemilus Severus" <daemilivssevervs@... <mailto:daemilivssevervs%40gmail.com> >
Sent: Thursday, April 09, 2009 5:23 PM
To: <Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com <mailto:Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com> >
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Tribune's Report (WAS Re: Exposing SAR)

> Yes, it would be nice if he said something and filled in the blanks.  As a
> regular citizen I rely on others to fill in the blanks for me regarding
> certain things.  Please stop being abstract and tell us what has upset you
> so and how it affects the regular citizen.
>
> D. Aemilius Severus
>
> On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 5:52 PM, Gaius Equitius Cato
> <mlcinnyc@... <mailto:mlcinnyc%40gmail.com> >wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> Cato Popillio Laeno Liviae Plautae SPD
>>
>> Salve.
>>
>> Perhaps he could have made the subject line a little less...dramatic, yes
>> you are right (that's why I changed it). But he does have the right to
>> express concerns he may have regarding activities he has witnessed in the
>> Senate.
>>
>> Livia Plauta, the tribune found some things disturbing in the Senate
>> House
>> recently and he apparently wants to share some of his feelings about
>> them,
>> which is I think well within the power given him by the Constitution:
>>
>> "To be privy to the debates of the Senate, and keep the citizens informed
>> as to the subjects and results thereof, in such manner and subject to
>> such
>> restrictions as may be defined by law;" (Constitution IV.A.7.d)
>>
>> As I said earlier, we will see what he has to say.
>>
>> Vale,
>>
>> Cato
>>
>>
>>
>
  
    

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62834 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2009-04-09
Subject: Tribune's Report (WAS Re: Exposing SAR)
Cato Tulliae Scholasticae sal.

Salve Scholastica.

I must disagree with you, supported by the words of the Constitution cited earlier.

You said:

"it is also not the tribunes' right to discuss the deliberations in curia, only to report the votes..."

yet the Constitution clearly states that the tribunes have the power

"To be privy to the debates of the Senate, and keep the citizens informed as to the subjects and results thereof" (IV.A.7.d)

Once more, I believe that this idea of a "seal" on the Senate is a fiction and not law.

Vale,

Cato
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62835 From: A. Sempronius Regulus Date: 2009-04-09
Subject: Seal/was Tribune's Report/was Exposing SAR
Salvete omnes,
For general discussion, -
 
1. where in the NR law is there a concept of a senatorial "seal"?
2. I'm ignorant on this specific matter: rights, obligations, limits of
the Tribune's Office.
 
I am not taking sides. I am just asking. As a philosopher, I've kept
myself mainly to philosopny in Rome, and as a cook, Roman cookery.
 
Those are good pursuits under the two phases of the empire. So, again,
just asking for information solely in terms of my two questions.
 
Offhand, another question,
 
Where is Cordus?
 
Valete omnes,
A. Sempronius Regulus

--- On Fri, 4/10/09, Gaius Equitius Cato <mlcinnyc@...> wrote:

From: Gaius Equitius Cato <mlcinnyc@...>
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Tribune's Report (WAS Re: Exposing SAR)
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Date: Friday, April 10, 2009, 1:16 AM

Cato Tulliae Scholasticae sal.

Salve Scholastica.

I must disagree with you, supported by the words of the Constitution cited earlier.

You said:

"it is also not the tribunes' right to discuss the deliberations in curia, only to report the votes..."

yet the Constitution clearly states that the tribunes have the power

"To be privy to the debates of the Senate, and keep the citizens informed as to the subjects and results thereof" (IV.A.7.d)

Once more, I believe that this idea of a "seal" on the Senate is a fiction and not law.

Vale,

Cato


Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62836 From: Titus Annaeus Regulus Date: 2009-04-09
Subject: Re: Tribune's Report (WAS Re: Exposing SAR)
Salve,
 
A quick snippet from the Constitution.
 
"7. Tribuni Plebis (Tribune of the Plebs). Five tribunes of the plebs shall be elected by the comitia plebis tributa to serve a term lasting one year. They must all be of the plebeian order, and shall have the following honors, powers, and obligations:
 
....(snipped for brevity)...
 
d. To be privy to the debates of the Senate, and keep the citizens informed as to the subjects and results thereof, in such manner and subject to such restrictions as may be defined by law;
1 To call the Senate to order;
2. To call the comitia plebis tributa to order, except when the Patrician order shall constitute more than ten percent (10%) of the total population, in which case the power shall be altered to calling the comitia populi tributa to order;
3. To administer the law;
4. To appoint scribae (clerks) to assist with administrative and other tasks, as they shall see fit.
I would say that he is doing exactly what his duty as Tribune requires he do. I shall wait until I hear specifics before judging the factuality of his claims, but the validity of him bringing such information to the attention of the citizen body I would say is unquestionable. When the Senate is in good working order then reporting the results of its meetings is keeping citizens informed. When, however, the Senate is not functioning correctly, as he claims, then informing citizens of this would become his duty would it not? Surely the purpose of the Tribune is not to sit idly by, gagged by the seal while the rights of the people are abused.
 
As for the topics being under the seal of the Senate, that is a tradition not a law (albeit a powerful one) that he has in any case respected by not mentioning specifics. He disclosed enough to alert citizens that things are perhaps not as they should be. He has done his duty of notifying the people, without releasing any sensitive information. What sort of Tribune would allow the Senate to (in his eyes at least) run amok, disrespecting the rights of citizens and circumventing the laws of NR? He has a fine line to walk between respecting Senate customs and doing his duty as a representative of the plebians, and I personally think he has done a fine job and should be commended for it.
 
Now should it turn out that there is no basis for these claims then perhaps a reprimand is in order, but as we have no evidence for or against at present, I will extend the benefit of the doubt that his actions were justified and in the spirit of his magisterial duty.
 
Vale,
T. Annæus Regulus

Sent: Thursday, April 09, 2009 9:51 PM
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Tribune's Report (WAS Re: Exposing SAR)


  
A. Tullia Scholastica Q. Valerio Poplicolae quiritibus bonae voluntatis S.P.D.
  

One of the problems, I think, is the what would constitute "breaking the
seal". It would be unfair to demand stuff from the tribune that he cannot
legally share.

    ATS:  Indeed, and moreover, virtually all of this is the product of a hyperactive imagination, while the rest may be a matter of interpretation.  It is also not the tribunesÂ’ right to discuss the deliberations in curia, only to report the votes; he has exceeded his mandate here.  Sat sapienti verbum.  

    Poplicola, de avibus mortuis quas vidisti:  cujus color erant?  T. americanus/T. migratorius (robin) est avis mediae magnitudinis; passeres aliaeque multae parvae, et minores T. americanis sunt.  Si omnino nigrae et plumae irides continere videbantur, erant graeculi, quae ova et interdum pullos aliarum avium edunt (et sua invicem corvis eduntur).  Si melius has aves describere depingereve possis, fortasse nomina tibi dare possim.  

Vale, et valete.  

------------ --------- --------- --------- --------- --
From: "D. Aemilus Severus" <daemilivssevervs@ gmail.com <mailto:daemilivssev ervs%40gmail. com> >
Sent: Thursday, April 09, 2009 5:23 PM
To: <Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com <mailto:Nova- Roma%40yahoogrou ps.com> >
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Tribune's Report (WAS Re: Exposing SAR)

> Yes, it would be nice if he said something and filled in the blanks.  As a
> regular citizen I rely on others to fill in the blanks for me regarding
> certain things.  Please stop being abstract and tell us what has upset you
> so and how it affects the regular citizen.
>
> D. Aemilius Severus
>
> On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 5:52 PM, Gaius Equitius Cato
> <mlcinnyc@gmail. com <mailto:mlcinnyc% 40gmail.com> >wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> Cato Popillio Laeno Liviae Plautae SPD
>>
>> Salve.
>>
>> Perhaps he could have made the subject line a little less...dramatic, yes
>> you are right (that's why I changed it). But he does have the right to
>> express concerns he may have regarding activities he has witnessed in the
>> Senate.
>>
>> Livia Plauta, the tribune found some things disturbing in the Senate
>> House
>> recently and he apparently wants to share some of his feelings about
>> them,
>> which is I think well within the power given him by the Constitution:
>>
>> "To be privy to the debates of the Senate, and keep the citizens informed
>> as to the subjects and results thereof, in such manner and subject to
>> such
>> restrictions as may be defined by law;" (Constitution IV.A.7.d)
>>
>> As I said earlier, we will see what he has to say.
>>
>> Vale,
>>
>> Cato
>>
>>
>>
>
  
    

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62837 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2009-04-09
Subject: Re: Seal/was Tribune's Report/was Exposing SAR
Cato Sempronio Regulo sal.

Salve.

Well, the Constitution's section on tribunes is paramount; after that the lex Didia Gemina de potestate tribunicia is a follow-up, as is the Labiena de intercessione.

I disagree with Scholastica regarding the *extent* of a tribune's right to give Senate "news", so to speak; Scholastica and I tend to have a generally different understanding of the "liberty vs. license" discussion, where (perhaps surprisingly) I am more on the side that favors "liberty"; but I am certainly open to a different interpretation as long as it can be based on the law.

As for the "seal" - well, I think it's an idea that someone once tossed out and it became its own self-replicating thing. I have found no support for it in the law. Yet.

Cordus is relaxing on his country estate :)

Vale,

Cato
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62838 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2009-04-09
Subject: Re: Seal/was Tribune's Report/was Exposing SAR
Salve Regule,

"A. Sempronius Regulus" <asempronius.regulus@...> writes:

> 1. where in the NR law is there a concept of a senatorial "seal"?

Nowhere. It's a tradition of the Senate as old as Nova Roma. See
http://novaroma.org/nr/Senate_Handbook_(Nova_Roma)#Senate_Traditions

> 2. I'm ignorant on this specific matter: rights, obligations, limits of
> the Tribune's Office.

http://novaroma.org/nr/Codex_Juris_Novae_Romae#Tribunes.2C_their_powers_and_duties

> Where is Cordus?

Cordus has taken a long term leave of absence from the main list.
He's doing his pupillage in a law office in England, which I
understand is a prerequisite to being admitted to the bar. I
correspond with him from time to time, but he usually takes a few
weeks to answer.

Vale,

CN-EQVIT-MARINVS
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62839 From: pompeia_minucia_tiberia Date: 2009-04-09
Subject: Tribune's Report (WAS Re: Exposing SAR)
---Pompeia Legate Pro Praetore Regule Sal

Ave governor.

I certainly appreciate your analysis.

And, for sure there is no legal aspect to the 'senate seal'; it is a longstanding tradition or pact amongst Senators to keep Senate business within the Senate body, until votes are formalized, and then this information is given to the people via the Tribunes. It's really not a gag per se on the Tribunes.

In pursuit of the constitutional passages regarding Tribune roles you quoted us below (thank you for your time in this) I'll give you the Plebian law which pursues the constitution in the matter at hand.

http://www.novaroma.org/nr/Lex_Moravia_de_renuntiatione_senatus_actorum_%28Nova_Roma%29

To discuss this Moravia Aventina law from 2003, when the Senate formally assembles in session, the Tribune is to report to the people that such assembly has occurred, the agenda, and when the time comes, the votes of the Senators and their respective comments, and anything else he/she feels he needs to say, to clarify the public's understanding. Tribunes are cautioned not to disclose private, sensitive information, such for example, details about the dismissal of a citizen...basically things which in all decency don't need to be made public. They are asked in this law to collaborate with the Senate with regard to sensitive matters.

I do *not* regard a Senate decision to remove the Tribunes as being a 'private' matter.

But here's the rub: If one Senator in the discussion phase of the session said 'maybe we don't need the Tribunes' , this is hardly an official Senate decision to usurp the tribunes. It takes a supermajority vote of the Senate to do that, as well as a vote of the comitia centuriata, as it involves a constitutional change.

I, as you, don't think that Galerius is at fault to disclose things of this nature to the public per se, but unless he finishes what he starts, I can't really judge the situation accurately, not being privy to Senate debates any longer.

A big NB: I don't *buy into* the notion that because the Senate assembles as a Board of Directors as opposed to a Senate, that the Tribune has no business reporting anything. This is convenient Bogus, the ? motive of which naturally worries me a bit, to be honest. The constitution clearly equates the Senate as Board of Directors, so a Board of Directors meeting is a Senate session and the Tribunes should, as I read it, be reporting such a meeting, and the continent agenda. If the meeting is cut short and no vote, the Tribune should report that too. I don't know from where this misinformation originated, but the Tribunes have full rights to report BOD meetings.

I am not sure what the Censors feel they can *do* to the Tribune; if they notarize him, he himself can veto it, and it takes a majority veto of Tribunes to overthrow his actions. In ancient Rome, a nota couldn't be vetoed; here in NR, it is a legally open action.

I think the Tribunes with respect would do well to familiarize themselves with their laws, obligations and responsibilities to the people. Granted the Tabularium is chronological in nature and it is difficult to crossreference. I know there was a Tribune's handbook at one point...is it still in the files section?

Vale





In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Titus Annaeus Regulus" <t.annaevsregvlvs@...> wrote:
>
> Salve,
>
> A quick snippet from the Constitution.
>
> "7. Tribuni Plebis (Tribune of the Plebs). Five tribunes of the plebs shall be elected by the comitia plebis tributa to serve a term lasting one year. They must all be of the plebeian order, and shall have the following honors, powers, and obligations:
>
> ....(snipped for brevity)...
>
> d. To be privy to the debates of the Senate, and keep the citizens informed as to the subjects and results thereof, in such manner and subject to such restrictions as may be defined by law;
> 1 To call the Senate to order;
> 2. To call the comitia plebis tributa to order, except when the Patrician order shall constitute more than ten percent (10%) of the total population, in which case the power shall be altered to calling the comitia populi tributa to order;
> 3. To administer the law;
> 4. To appoint scribae (clerks) to assist with administrative and other tasks, as they shall see fit.
> I would say that he is doing exactly what his duty as Tribune requires he do. I shall wait until I hear specifics before judging the factuality of his claims, but the validity of him bringing such information to the attention of the citizen body I would say is unquestionable. When the Senate is in good working order then reporting the results of its meetings is keeping citizens informed. When, however, the Senate is not functioning correctly, as he claims, then informing citizens of this would become his duty would it not? Surely the purpose of the Tribune is not to sit idly by, gagged by the seal while the rights of the people are abused.
>
> As for the topics being under the seal of the Senate, that is a tradition not a law (albeit a powerful one) that he has in any case respected by not mentioning specifics. He disclosed enough to alert citizens that things are perhaps not as they should be. He has done his duty of notifying the people, without releasing any sensitive information. What sort of Tribune would allow the Senate to (in his eyes at least) run amok, disrespecting the rights of citizens and circumventing the laws of NR? He has a fine line to walk between respecting Senate customs and doing his duty as a representative of the plebians, and I personally think he has done a fine job and should be commended for it.
>
> Now should it turn out that there is no basis for these claims then perhaps a reprimand is in order, but as we have no evidence for or against at present, I will extend the benefit of the doubt that his actions were justified and in the spirit of his magisterial duty.
>
> Vale,
> T. Annæus Regulus
>
>
> From: A. Tullia Scholastica
> Sent: Thursday, April 09, 2009 9:51 PM
> To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Tribune's Report (WAS Re: Exposing SAR)
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> A. Tullia Scholastica Q. Valerio Poplicolae quiritibus bonae voluntatis S.P.D.
>
>
> One of the problems, I think, is the what would constitute "breaking the
> seal". It would be unfair to demand stuff from the tribune that he cannot
> legally share.
>
> ATS: Indeed, and moreover, virtually all of this is the product of a hyperactive imagination, while the rest may be a matter of interpretation. It is also not the tribunes' right to discuss the deliberations in curia, only to report the votes; he has exceeded his mandate here. Sat sapienti verbum.
>
> Poplicola, de avibus mortuis quas vidisti: cujus color erant? T. americanus/T. migratorius (robin) est avis mediae magnitudinis; passeres aliaeque multae parvae, et minores T. americanis sunt. Si omnino nigrae et plumae irides continere videbantur, erant graeculi, quae ova et interdum pullos aliarum avium edunt (et sua invicem corvis eduntur). Si melius has aves describere depingereve possis, fortasse nomina tibi dare possim.
>
> Vale, et valete.
>
> --------------------------------------------------
> From: "D. Aemilus Severus" <daemilivssevervs@... <mailto:daemilivssevervs%40gmail.com> >
> Sent: Thursday, April 09, 2009 5:23 PM
> To: <Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com <mailto:Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com> >
> Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Tribune's Report (WAS Re: Exposing SAR)
>
> > Yes, it would be nice if he said something and filled in the blanks. As a
> > regular citizen I rely on others to fill in the blanks for me regarding
> > certain things. Please stop being abstract and tell us what has upset you
> > so and how it affects the regular citizen.
> >
> > D. Aemilius Severus
> >
> > On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 5:52 PM, Gaius Equitius Cato
> > <mlcinnyc@... <mailto:mlcinnyc%40gmail.com> >wrote:
> >
> >>
> >>
> >> Cato Popillio Laeno Liviae Plautae SPD
> >>
> >> Salve.
> >>
> >> Perhaps he could have made the subject line a little less...dramatic, yes
> >> you are right (that's why I changed it). But he does have the right to
> >> express concerns he may have regarding activities he has witnessed in the
> >> Senate.
> >>
> >> Livia Plauta, the tribune found some things disturbing in the Senate
> >> House
> >> recently and he apparently wants to share some of his feelings about
> >> them,
> >> which is I think well within the power given him by the Constitution:
> >>
> >> "To be privy to the debates of the Senate, and keep the citizens informed
> >> as to the subjects and results thereof, in such manner and subject to
> >> such
> >> restrictions as may be defined by law;" (Constitution IV.A.7.d)
> >>
> >> As I said earlier, we will see what he has to say.
> >>
> >> Vale,
> >>
> >> Cato
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62840 From: Steve Moore Date: 2009-04-09
Subject: Senate Seal
M. Valerius Potitus omnibus SPD.

What's all this about the Senate Seal being part of Nova Roma law? The Senate Handbook, which is available to all citizens on the website, states clearly that the Seal is a "Senate Tradition", NOT a part of the law:

"While a great deal of what the Nova Roman Senate does is required or sanctioned by law or constitutional provision there are a few important conventions that have been established by tradition and consensus.

"The first and most important is the Senate seal. This is an unwritten but mutually agreed to procedure in which the content of Senate discussions are kept within the confines of the Senate. Senators may discuss issues between themselves and other Senators as long as non-Senators are not privy to these discussions."

Whether the Seal is a good idea or not, it is not part of the law--it is nothing more nor less than a tradition.

Valete,
Valerius
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62841 From: QFabiusMaxmi@aol.com Date: 2009-04-09
Subject: Re: Tribune's Report (WAS Re: Exposing SAR)
In a message dated 4/9/2009 6:18:27 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time, mlcinnyc@... writes:
Once more, I believe that this idea of a "seal" on the Senate is a fiction and not law.
I have always believed we had the seal for two reasons.
 
1. For the employees of NR INC when their activities are being discussed by the Senate, so it does not become common knowledge.
 
2. That Senators during house deliberations or debates do not take advantage of speaking opportunities to impress their audience in NR how great they are.   
 
Is it Roman?  The only time the Republican Senate met among the people was twice a year in the Field of Mars.
 
Q. Fabius Maximus
 


Feeling the pinch at the grocery store? Make dinner for $10 or less.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62842 From: Stephen Gallagher Date: 2009-04-09
Subject: Re: Senate Seal
Salvete
 
And the Romans never did anything for tradition.
 
The Constitution of Nova Roma allows the Senate to set its own rules, rules that cannot be overturned by any Lex. We could pass an SC to codify the Senate seal but have not done so as we like the use of tradition. We expect those who are privy to Senate meeting to respect our traditions.
 
Valete
 
Tiberius Galerius Paulinus
 

 

To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
From: astrobear@...
Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2009 02:35:05 +0000
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Senate Seal



M. Valerius Potitus omnibus SPD.

What's all this about the Senate Seal being part of Nova Roma law? The Senate Handbook, which is available to all citizens on the website, states clearly that the Seal is a "Senate Tradition", NOT a part of the law:

"While a great deal of what the Nova Roman Senate does is required or sanctioned by law or constitutional provision there are a few important conventions that have been established by tradition and consensus.

"The first and most important is the Senate seal. This is an unwritten but mutually agreed to procedure in which the content of Senate discussions are kept within the confines of the Senate. Senators may discuss issues between themselves and other Senators as long as non-Senators are not privy to these discussions. "

Whether the Seal is a good idea or not, it is not part of the law--it is nothing more nor less than a tradition.

Valete,
Valerius


Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62843 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2009-04-10
Subject: Re: Seal/was Tribune's Report/was Exposing SAR
Re: [Nova-Roma] Seal/was Tribune's Report/was Exposing SAR

  A. Tullia Scholastica A. Sempronio Regulo C. Equitio Catoni quiritibus bonae voluntatis S.P.D.

  

Salvete omnes,
For general discussion, -
 
  1. where in the NR law is there a concept of a senatorial "seal"?

                    ATS:  Business discussed in all magisterial cohors lists is deemed secret unless and until it is time to publish such matters.  Senate discussions are not to be published.  

2. I'm ignorant on this specific matter: rights, obligations, limits of
the Tribune's Office.

    ATS:  They have several rights, including intercessio, but their reporting rights regarding Senate matters are confined to posting the agenda and the votes.  That allows the citizens to see the subjects and result of discussions, which is plenty for that purpose and all that is meant by the constitution.  The senators (and, for that matter, scribae, accensi, and magistrates) speak freely within their respective lists, as do many others in the outside world, which would not be possible if their deliberations were fully public.   Anyone who thinks that personnel discussions at the local school board or corporate ones in boardrooms or political ones in the proverbial smoke-filled rooms are fully open to the public has been ingesting substances not typically found at Walgreen’s.  
 
I am not taking sides. I am just asking. As a philosopher, I've kept
myself mainly to philosopny in Rome, and as a cook, Roman cookery.

    ATS:  Philosophia biou kybernhths.
 
Those are good pursuits under the two phases of the empire. So, again,
just asking for information solely in terms of my two questions.
 
Offhand, another question,
 
Where is Cordus?

    ATS:  Cordus finished his legal education, and after many months’ absence, has reappeared on his provincial list, but not elsewhere (at least not to my knowledge).  He stated that he has been unusually busy this past year, though he has been missing for longer than that.  
 
Valete omnes,
A. Sempronius Regulus

            Vale, et valete.  



--- On Fri, 4/10/09, Gaius Equitius Cato <mlcinnyc@...> wrote:

From: Gaius Equitius Cato <mlcinnyc@...>
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Tribune's Report (WAS Re: Exposing SAR)
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Date: Friday, April 10, 2009, 1:16 AM

Cato Tulliae Scholasticae sal.

Salve Scholastica.

I must disagree with you, supported by the words of the Constitution cited earlier.

You said:

"it is also not the tribunes' right to discuss the deliberations in curia, only to report the votes..."

yet the Constitution clearly states that the tribunes have the power

"To be privy to the debates of the Senate, and keep the citizens informed as to the subjects and results thereof" (IV.A.7.d)

Once more, I believe that this idea of a "seal" on the Senate is a fiction and not law.

Vale,

Cato


 
  
    
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62844 From: Steve Moore Date: 2009-04-10
Subject: Resignation of Quaestor
M. Valerius Potitus Consulibus omnibusque SPD.

Honored Consuls,

I hereby resign my quaestorship effective immediately. I do not resign my citizenship.

It has become clear that I can no longer tolerate the goals and methods of the praetorial cohort.

I want to go on record as saying that praetor P. Memmius Albucius is an honorable man, and I wish him well.

I will continue to focus on local matters and the building of Nova Roma, especially in the province of America Austroccidentalis.

Valete.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62845 From: Q. Valerius Poplicola Date: 2009-04-10
Subject: Re: Resignation of Quaestor
Q. Valerius M. Valerio SPD

Mi frater, I sent you something privately. I ask you, and the Praetores, to
hold off on accepting this resignation until you have read it. I wish you
would consider.

Cura ut ualeas!

--------------------------------------------------
From: "Steve Moore" <astrobear@...>
Sent: Thursday, April 09, 2009 11:44 PM
To: <Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com>
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Resignation of Quaestor

> M. Valerius Potitus Consulibus omnibusque SPD.
>
> Honored Consuls,
>
> I hereby resign my quaestorship effective immediately. I do not resign my
> citizenship.
>
> It has become clear that I can no longer tolerate the goals and methods of
> the praetorial cohort.
>
> I want to go on record as saying that praetor P. Memmius Albucius is an
> honorable man, and I wish him well.
>
> I will continue to focus on local matters and the building of Nova Roma,
> especially in the province of America Austroccidentalis.
>
> Valete.
>
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62846 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2009-04-10
Subject: Re: Resignation of Quaestor
Cato Valerio Potito quaestore sal.

Salve, quaestor.

I too urge you to rescind your resignation before it becomes official. It is always better to work for improvement from within - I can say this from very personal and recent experience :)

Vale,

Cato



--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Q. Valerius Poplicola" <q.valerius.poplicola@...> wrote:
>
> Q. Valerius M. Valerio SPD
>
> Mi frater, I sent you something privately. I ask you, and the Praetores, to
> hold off on accepting this resignation until you have read it. I wish you
> would consider.
>
> Cura ut ualeas!
>
> --------------------------------------------------
> From: "Steve Moore" <astrobear@...>
> Sent: Thursday, April 09, 2009 11:44 PM
> To: <Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com>
> Subject: [Nova-Roma] Resignation of Quaestor
>
> > M. Valerius Potitus Consulibus omnibusque SPD.
> >
> > Honored Consuls,
> >
> > I hereby resign my quaestorship effective immediately. I do not resign my
> > citizenship.
> >
> > It has become clear that I can no longer tolerate the goals and methods of
> > the praetorial cohort.
> >
> > I want to go on record as saying that praetor P. Memmius Albucius is an
> > honorable man, and I wish him well.
> >
> > I will continue to focus on local matters and the building of Nova Roma,
> > especially in the province of America Austroccidentalis.
> >
> > Valete.
> >
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62847 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2009-04-10
Subject: Re: Seal/was Tribune's Report/was Exposing SAR
Cato omnibus in foro SPD

Salvete.

There are times when, as in any corporation, the Senate should act with the protection of individual privacy in mind. That is well understood. Legally (macronationally speaking), the Senate must declare itself to be in "executive session" for its workings to be held in private.

But, quirites, it is the irresponsible and seemingly uncontrollable addiction to some kind of secrecy that leads to the kinds of fiascos we have seen recently unfolding. If a tribune - or anyone, for that matter - sees something they don't like happening, they have the right to speak about it. They have the right to hold our elected magistrates accountable for their actions.

Magistrates do not receive their authority from some nebulous, hidden, unchallenged source - they receive it from *us*, the People of the res publica. Imperium is not some divine quality inherent in a magistrate; it is a gift, given freely and from one source only - the People. We are a res publica, not a principate. Magistrates may not act with impunity, but must act bound by the laws put in place by the People to safeguard the health and free actions of the State.

Valete,

Cato
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62848 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2009-04-10
Subject: a.d. IV Id. Apr.
Cato omnibus in foro SPD

Salvete omnes!

Hodiernus dies est ante diem IV Idus Aprilis; haec dies nefastus est.

"Next, the Games of Ceres, there's no need to say why:
Obvious: the bounteous promise and gifts of the goddess.
The bread of primitive humans was made of plants,
That the earth produced without being asked:
They sometimes plucked wild grasses from the turf,
Sometimes tender leaves from the treetops made a meal.
Later the acorn was known: its discovery was fine,
Since the sturdy oak offered a rich horde.
Ceres was first to summon men to a better diet,
Replacing their acorns with more nourishing food.
She forced bulls to bow their necks to the yoke:
So the deep-ploughed soil first saw the light.
Copper was prized then, iron was still hidden:
Ah! If only it could have been hidden forever.
Ceres delights in peace: pray, you farmers,
Pray for endless peace and a peace-loving leader.
Honour the goddess with wheat, and dancing salt grains,
And grains of incense offered on the ancient hearths,
And if there's no incense, burn your resinous torches:
Ceres is pleased with little, if it's pure in kind.
You girded attendants lift those knives from the ox:
Let the ox plough, while you sacrifice the lazy sow,
It's not fitting for an axe to strike a neck that's yoked:
Let the ox live, and toil through the stubborn soil." - Ovid, Fasti IV


"And likewise games were held and golden paterae placed at the temple
of Ceres by the plebeian aediles L. Aelius Paetus and C Fulvius Curvus
with the money from fines that they had collected from those convicted
of using public pasture." - Livy, History of Rome 10.23

Today is the first day of the festival of Ceres. Ceres is the Roman
goddess of agriculture, grain, and the love a mother bears for her
child. She is the daughter of Saturn and Ops, the sister of Iuppiter,
and the mother of Proserpine. Ceres is a kind and benevolent goddess
to the Romans and they had a common expression, "fit for Ceres," which
meant splendid.

She was beloved for her service to mankind in giving them the gift of
the harvest, the reward for cultivation of the soil. Also known as the
Greek goddess Demeter, Ceres was the goddess of the harvest and was
credited with teaching humans how to grow, preserve, and prepare grain
and corn. She was thought to be responsible for the fertility of the
land.

Ceres was the only one of the gods who was involved on a day-to-day
basis in the lives of the common folk. While others occasionally
"dabbled" in human affairs when it suited their personal interests, or
came to the aid of "special" mortals they favored, the goddess Ceres
was truly the nurturer of mankind. Ceres was worshipped at her temple
on the Aventine Hill, one of the Seven Hills of ancient Rome. Ceres
is portrayed holding a scepter or farming tool in one hand and a
basket of flowers, fruits, or grain in the other. She may also be
wearing a garland made from ears of corn.

The Romans explained the turning of the seasons with the following
story: Ceres was the sister of Iuppiter, and Proserpine was their
daughter. Proserpine was kidnapped by Pluto, god of the underworld,
to be his bride. By the time Ceres followed her daughter, she was
gone into the earth. Making matters worse, Ceres learned that Pluto
had been given Jupiter's approval to be the husband of his daughter.
Ceres was so angry that she went to live in the world of men,
disguised as an old woman, and stopped all the plants and crops from
growing, causing a famine. Iuppiter and the other gods tried to get
her to change her mind but she was adamant. Iuppiter eventually
realized that he had to get Proserpine back from the underworld, and
sent for her. Unfortunately, Pluto secretly gave her food before she
left, and once one had eaten in the underworld one could not forever
leave. Proserpine was therefore forced to return to the underworld
for four months every year. She comes out in spring and spends the
time until autumn with Ceres, but has to go back to the underworld in
the winter. Her parting from Ceres every fall is why plants lose
their leaves, seeds lie dormant under the ground, and nothing grows
until spring when Proserpine is reunited with her mother.

Valete bene!

Cato
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62849 From: Steve Moore Date: 2009-04-10
Subject: Re: Resignation of Quaestor

Salvete.

 

I sincerely appreciate the wise counsel of my cousin, Poplicola, and Senator Cato. To resign is to break an oath sworn before the fierce gods of my gens and my ancestors on behalf of the People of Nova Roma. It would be an act of impiety to break such an oath. My Valerian ancestors worked and fought and died to create the ancient Republic. I would be an unworthy member of this gens if I gave in to my anger and let petty tyrannies prevent me from fulfilling my duty to the People of Nova Roma.

 

That being said, I am reluctant to go back on my decision, made after many abuses to my dignity. Further, I am unwilling to return to a position in which I am treated as nothing more than a scribe, and in which I cannot even voice my concerns about matters in the praetor’s office without being shouted down.

 

However, wishing to keep my oath and to be of service to the Republic, I ask the Consuls to allow me to rescind my resignation.

 

M. Valerius Potitus

 

 

 

 

 


From: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com [mailto: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com ] On Behalf Of Gaius Equitius Cato
Sent: Thursday, April 09, 2009 10:38 PM
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Resignation of Quaestor

 




Cato Valerio Potito quaestore sal.

Salve, quaestor.

I too urge you to rescind your resignation before it becomes official. It is always better to work for improvement from within - I can say this from very personal and recent experience :)

Vale,

Cato

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com, "Q. Valerius Poplicola" <q.valerius. poplicola@ ...> wrote:

>
> Q. Valerius M. Valerio SPD
>
> Mi frater, I sent you something privately. I ask you, and the Praetores,
to
> hold off on accepting this resignation until you have read it. I wish you
> would consider.
>
> Cura ut ualeas!
>

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62850 From: Cn. Cornelius Lentulus Date: 2009-04-10
Subject: Reconstruction of Roman Censorship
Cn. Lentulus Fl. Glaerio sal.


>>> The Censors need to be removed as a permanent office and restored to
their 18-months-every- 5-year role that they held in ancient Rome. This
constant backseat driving is entirely detrimental, as is their
near-stranglehold on the Senate.

The job of registering new cives can easily be transferred to other
lesser magistracies. <<<<




That's true. This was our plan last year, too. But since we have cenuses in every two years, our censors have to be elected every other year. I also think that though a term of 18 months would be ideal, a 6 months term were a better solution.

We *need* that biannual census, so I don't think it should be changed. What we could change, it's the censors' term. 18 months or fewer, preferably fewer.

Vale!


--- Ven 10/4/09, Vedius <vedius@...> ha scritto:
Da: Vedius <vedius@...>
Oggetto: Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: Exposing Senate Acts of Illegality!
A: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Data: Venerdì 10 Aprile 2009, 01:09



The Censors need to be removed as a permanent office and restored to
their 18-months-every- 5-year role that they held in ancient Rome. This
constant backseat driving is entirely detrimental, as is their
near-stranglehold on the Senate.

The job of registering new cives can easily be transferred to other
lesser magistracies.

FVG

gaiuspopilliuslaena s wrote:
> Laenas Cato sal.
>
> The Tribune has exceeded his reporting responsibilities and he has done a dsservice to Nova Roma with the title of his post and making accusations without any evidence or specifics.
>
> I expect the Censors to post something on this matter soon.
>
> Vale bene.
>
>
>
> ------------ --------- --------- ------
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>


Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62851 From: L Julia Aquila Date: 2009-04-10
Subject: Re: Exposing Senate Acts of Illegality!
Salve Senator Sulla,

This is quite a long speech Senator. Your performance reminds me of old Rome, stool, stage or soapbox and all; an excellent study in Oratory. I will not slight you in the least though and although I have no intention of rewarding your sense of humor by recognizing your use of comedy: a proclivity you appear to value in yourself. Have you ever thought of writing fiction? You demonstrate an innate ability to do so. Had it not been at the expense of Nova Roma, I might have uttered a silent bravo and a one handed applause being that it lacks polish. Perhaps Senator Maximus could help you further improve your game as he boasts of his proficiency in Role Playing Games, and of course his "success" in Hollywood. However this is not a Role Playing Game. Just wanted to remind you in case you have forgotten Senator Sulla.


This does concern a group of notorious Senators, Senator Sulla. Just that you and I may disagree on which group. With the exception of a particular convoluted and ominous and therefore meaningless paragraph from the center of Tribune Aurelianus' statement regarding the Senate and Consulship, from "IÂ… to Consulship."
I will ask specifics on that question of the obvious author as I want to get it from the horse's mouth so to speak.
Thank you Senator Sulla, this was illuminating.

Vale

L. Julia Aquila



--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Robert Woolwine" <l_cornelius_sulla@...> wrote:
>
> Ave,
>
> I am extremely glad that some of the information is starting to get reported to the People. I think it is incumbent on the People of Nova Roma to be aware of the words and actions of the Presiding Magistrates of Nova Roma - those that have the power to summon the Senate. I believe it would be beneficial to release specific messages to the review of the People of Nova Roma regarding the now disclosed adjourned Board of Director Meeting earlier this month. Do you know the agenda of the meeting? Do you know why it was adjourned? Do you know what transpired to cause the adjournment? So far to date this has gone completely unreported. Why?
>
> Other issues should also be discussed - not just in the Senate but here where the people can voice their opinions and concerns as well. Where is the transparency? Where is the accountability? Our Consul speaks of Obstructionism and Filibustering. Yet, the ML is totally silent on many issues! Why is that? I hope that more information will be released - either in summary form or in a post by post release. The time for transparency is now!
>
> Those of us on the Back Alley (who the Consuls would call obstructionists/filibusters) have been at the forefront in trying to have more transparency in Nova Roma. I think it is now incumbent for this message to reach the Main List! You are the People of Nova Roma. You have a right to ask your magistrates what is going on! You have a right to demand to know what actions are going on! Speak up Nova Roma! You have no idea what has been going on and you have a a responsibility to know!!!! You should demand your right to know what has been transpiring!
>
> Respectfully,
>
> Lucius Cornelius Sulla Felix
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62852 From: L Julia Aquila Date: 2009-04-10
Subject: Re: Exposing Senate Acts of Illegality!
L. Julia Aquila Ap. Galerio Aureliano S.P.D.

As a fairly new citizen I have some enquiries for you. In order to serve the respublica, it is of the utmost importance that I ask questions to supplement my education so I can make the best decisions.

Could you please cite your sources for this information? This will assist me in my own research.

This is a very generalized notice, is this your interpretation based on your fact finding and research?

You are a man of courageous opinion, an elected official and representative of the people, and therefore a man we, the citizens, entrusted to have a valid logical opinion. Tribune Galerius Aurelianus is this also your personal opinion?

In a court of law this statement would never stand up, a judge might throw it out with the possibility of being fine citing a frivolous lawsuit. It would never make it to the docket. If you are to hold others to the letter of the law, the accusation must also reflect the law and be in compliance and no amount of oratory skills can change that. You state the purpose of this report is for the benefit Nova Roman citizens "of the actual goings on, of some of our officials", which you also state it is " your duty." You also call for the other tribunes to disclose "the truth of this situation", yet you offer no truths yourself. How can such a statement benefit anyone? The evidence is clear by the response, so please, Tribune, redeem yourself.
As a citizen of Nova Roma, I ask you to explain yourself.

Vale,

L. Julia Aquila


--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "galerius_of_rome" <galerius_of_rome@...> wrote:
>
> Save et salvete,Greetings and salutations ,Fellow Romans.From time to time it is the duty of the Tribunate of the Plebian Order to post observations on the functioning and the actions of those who have been elected as our representatives in the Senate and upper echelons of our government.Especially now on the eve of a new elections.So therefore I wish to tender a report for the benefit of your knowledge, of the actual goings on, of some of our officials, as I feel my duty to do so.Also, I am not making suggestions as to how you should vote.Only to know your candidates and to choose wisely.As it stands at the present time, there are some very disturbing sounds eminating from the Senate of Nova Roma.Some of these things would threaten the rights of the people and consequently diminish the role, of the individual Roman citizen to be able to have the representation, that is called for in our Constitution.I site for one instance that it
> has been discussed, just how to eliminate the Tribunate of the Plebians and to secure the unrivaled power of Consulship.This sounds like an attempted coup attempt, to usurp the rights of the average Roman citizen.Not only are the many debates about subjects which are close to if not downright in total regard for the laws of Nova Roma.Meetings ajourned because no one can agree on anything.With much conduct unbecoming of any official.Profanity and angry indignation among the participants.The questioning of the intelligence of our fine webmaster, who has replaced our last, one run off by the same type of condecending behavior.Making deals and agreements without consulting the people.And the list goes on ad nauseum.A true theatre of the absurd.If it were possible, I would call upon the citizens of our Republic to place a no confidence vote on this group of elected officials, who should be made to explain, these actions to the people or risk re-call.I
> hope that others will step forward without fear to tell our citizens their individual experiences.I call upon my colleagues in the Tribunate to speak out knowing full well the truth of this situation.To all citizens who will stand up for their rights for proper representation as provided by our Constitution and our Lex.
>
> Vale et valete,
> Ap.Galerius Aurelianus
> Tribune of the Plebs
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62853 From: M.CVR.COMPLVTENSIS Date: 2009-04-10
Subject: Re: Resignation of Quaestor
M. Curiatius Complutensis Consul M. Valerio Potito S·P·D·

You have said: "I ask the Consuls to allow me to rescind my resignation."

After consultation with Censors and Praetors I must say that this is not possible: the resignation from office is inmediate, there is no waiting period. You can stand for election to Quaestor in a new election but you cannnot rescind your resignation.

Cura ut valeas

Steve Moore escribió:

Salvete.

 

I sincerely appreciate the wise counsel of my cousin, Poplicola, and Senator Cato. To resign is to break an oath sworn before the fierce gods of my gens and my ancestors on behalf of the People of Nova Roma. It would be an act of impiety to break such an oath. My Valerian ancestors worked and fought and died to create the ancient Republic. I would be an unworthy member of this gens if I gave in to my anger and let petty tyrannies prevent me from fulfilling my duty to the People of Nova Roma.

 

That being said, I am reluctant to go back on my decision, made after many abuses to my dignity. Further, I am unwilling to return to a position in which I am treated as nothing more than a scribe, and in which I cannot even voice my concerns about matters in the praetor’s office without being shouted down.

 

However, wishing to keep my oath and to be of service to the Republic, I ask the Consuls to allow me to rescind my resignation.

 

M. Valerius Potitus

 

 

 

 

 


From: Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com [mailto: Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com ] On Behalf Of Gaius Equitius Cato
Sent: Thursday, April 09, 2009 10:38 PM
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Resignation of Quaestor

 




Cato Valerio Potito quaestore sal.

Salve, quaestor.

I too urge you to rescind your resignation before it becomes official. It is always better to work for improvement from within - I can say this from very personal and recent experience :)

Vale,

Cato

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com, "Q. Valerius Poplicola" <q.valerius. poplicola@ ...> wrote:
>
> Q. Valerius M. Valerio SPD
>
> Mi frater, I sent you something privately. I ask you, and the Praetores, to
> hold off on accepting this resignation until you have read it. I wish you
> would consider.
>
> Cura ut ualeas!
>

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62854 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2009-04-10
Subject: A Question of Valid Candidacy
C. Equitius Cato omnibus in foro SPD

Salvete.

I have been thinking about this.

The Vedia de cursu honorum says, in part: "No individual may assume the office of one of the ordinarii who has not been a registered citizen in good standing for at least six months." (II)

Since I resigned and have returned, less than six months have passed. What does the law say about returning citizens?

The lex Minucia Moravia de civitate eiuranda says, in part:

"All rights and privileges of citizenship are restored in full to a returning Citizen at the time his or her citizenship is reestablished. This lex does not in itself restrict a returning Citizen in any way from lawfully pursuing any entitlements or official positions (via election or appointment) for which he or she would again become eligible." (VIII.A)

A couple of days a go, I received an email from a citizen named Q. Caecilia Laeta asking if I thought that the waiver of the 90-day period was breaking the law. I answered that it could not possibly be, since the Senate's power to do so is *in* the law: The lex Minucia Moravia de civitate eiuranda also says: "At the discretion of the Senate, the normal waiting period of ninety (90) days may be waived." (VIII.B)

My view is, of course, that since I have returned with the 90-day waiting period waived by the Senate in accordance with the law, I have returned "in full" and unrestricted, and since the law specifically says that I "again become eligible" when talking about pursuing an "official position (via election...)", I believe that this allows me to run for office in spite of the six months' time mentioned in the lex Vedia. No magistrate, from censor to consul to praetor, has made any indication publicly that they thought differently.

So I ask you, the People: what do you think? Should I seek office now, as I believe I am entitled to do, or should I wait, because there is the hint of a question? There are two other candidates for the office I seek, so it's not like the vacancy will continue either way.

Valete,

Cato
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62855 From: Lucius Coruncanius Cato Date: 2009-04-10
Subject: L. Coruncanius Cato's candidacy for Aedilis Curulis
Lucius Coruncanius Cato omnibus salutem plurimam dicit

Salvete cives!

I am L.Coruncanius Cato, born 31 years ago near Colonia Iulia Augusta Paterna Faventia Barcino.

I've just got back from a year travelling and exploring around, so most of you don't know me. I have not held any magistracy, and for that I consider myself "new blood" for our Res Publica, to whom I wish to serve.
For now I am member of Keypath and Cultus Deorum task forces, spreading the word of ancient and new Roma both in the internet and in "real" life.

With help and guidance of the Gods, I promise to fullfill the interests of the Republic and of its citizens. I promise to honor the Gods and the Constitution of Nova Roma, enforce the law when required and only when solid evidence has been shown, thus fulfilling the duties of Aedile Curule's office, being one of them the Magna Mater project, which I intend to retake from the inaction for the past year, thus propperly honoring our beloved Great Mother.

For those reasons I demand your vote, fellow cives of Nova Roma, for my candidacy to Curule Aedile.
May mighty Minerva and our Great Mother Cybele help us.

Di vos incolumem custodiant!

--
L. Coruncanius Cato

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62856 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2009-04-10
Subject: Re: Resignation of Quaestor
Cato Curiatio Complutenso M. Valerio Potito omnibusque in foro SPD

Salvete.

Consul, technically that is not true. The lex Minucia eiuratione magistratum says that:

"IV. A tendered resignation from an elected office becomes legal and binding once receipt of same is acknowledged to the resigning Magistrate by an appropriate presiding official (defined below) of the comitia by which he or she was elected."

and

"B.i. Resignations of offices elected in the Comitia Populi Tributa or the Comitia Centuriata are to be tendered in writing to the Consuls, or in the presence of three or more citizens,who shall acknowledge and communicate receipt of the resignation to the Consuls."

and that

"VI. The presiding comitia magistrate who lawfully acknowledges receipt of a resignation of office to the tendering magistrate as detailed in Ai and Bi, shall be responsible for communicating this information to the Censors, the Magister Aranearius and the citizenry via public fora within 48 hours."

so until a magistrate charged with presiding over the comitia (the comitia populi tributa) which elected the quaestor acknowledges it as having been received by the necessary agents, and that magistrate communicates this information, the resignation can be rescinded.

Valete,

Cato





-- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "M.CVR.COMPLVTENSIS" <complutensis@...> wrote:
>
> M. Curiatius Complutensis Consul M. Valerio Potito S·P·D·
>
> You have said: "I ask the Consuls to allow me to rescind my resignation."
>
> After consultation with Censors and Praetors I must say that this is not
> possible: the resignation from office is inmediate, there is no waiting
> period. You can stand for election to Quaestor in a new election but you
> cannnot rescind your resignation.
>
> Cura ut valeas
>
> Steve Moore escribió:
> >
> >
> > Salvete.
> >
> >
> >
> > I sincerely appreciate the wise counsel of my cousin, Poplicola, and
> > Senator Cato. To resign is to break an oath sworn before the fierce
> > gods of my gens and my ancestors on behalf of the People of Nova Roma.
> > It would be an act of impiety to break such an oath. My Valerian
> > ancestors worked and fought and died to create the ancient Republic. I
> > would be an unworthy member of this gens if I gave in to my anger and
> > let petty tyrannies prevent me from fulfilling my duty to the People
> > of Nova Roma.
> >
> >
> >
> > That being said, I am reluctant to go back on my decision, made after
> > many abuses to my dignity. Further, I am unwilling to return to a
> > position in which I am treated as nothing more than a scribe, and in
> > which I cannot even voice my concerns about matters in the praetor's
> > office without being shouted down.
> >
> >
> >
> > However, wishing to keep my oath and to be of service to the Republic,
> > I ask the Consuls to allow me to rescind my resignation.
> >
> >
> >
> > M. Valerius Potitus
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > *From:* Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com [mailto:Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com]
> > *On Behalf Of *Gaius Equitius Cato
> > *Sent:* Thursday, April 09, 2009 10:38 PM
> > *To:* Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> > *Subject:* [Nova-Roma] Re: Resignation of Quaestor
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Cato Valerio Potito quaestore sal.
> >
> > Salve, quaestor.
> >
> > I too urge you to rescind your resignation before it becomes official.
> > It is always better to work for improvement from within - I can say
> > this from very personal and recent experience :)
> >
> > Vale,
> >
> > Cato
> >
> > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com <mailto:Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com>,
> > "Q. Valerius Poplicola" <q.valerius.poplicola@> wrote:
> > >
> > > Q. Valerius M. Valerio SPD
> > >
> > > Mi frater, I sent you something privately. I ask you, and the
> > Praetores, to
> > > hold off on accepting this resignation until you have read it. I wish
> > you
> > > would consider.
> > >
> > > Cura ut ualeas!
> > >
> >
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62857 From: M.CVR.COMPLVTENSIS Date: 2009-04-10
Subject: Re: Resignation of Quaestor
Valerius Poplicola, Equitius Cato, Cornelius Lentulus, the Censores and  myself have read the resignation message.

The Censors have acted and have update the record of Valerius Potitus.

When the Consuls have received the message of Valerius Potitus I have consulted with Censors and Praetores to know if was possible rescind the resignation.

I have replied according the information received from Censores and Praetores.

Vale

M. Curiatius Complutensis
Consul


Gaius Equitius Cato escribió:

Cato Curiatio Complutenso M. Valerio Potito omnibusque in foro SPD

Salvete.

Consul, technically that is not true. The lex Minucia eiuratione magistratum says that:

"IV. A tendered resignation from an elected office becomes legal and binding once receipt of same is acknowledged to the resigning Magistrate by an appropriate presiding official (defined below) of the comitia by which he or she was elected."

and

"B.i. Resignations of offices elected in the Comitia Populi Tributa or the Comitia Centuriata are to be tendered in writing to the Consuls, or in the presence of three or more citizens,who shall acknowledge and communicate receipt of the resignation to the Consuls."

and that

"VI. The presiding comitia magistrate who lawfully acknowledges receipt of a resignation of office to the tendering magistrate as detailed in Ai and Bi, shall be responsible for communicating this information to the Censors, the Magister Aranearius and the citizenry via public fora within 48 hours."

so until a magistrate charged with presiding over the comitia (the comitia populi tributa) which elected the quaestor acknowledges it as having been received by the necessary agents, and that magistrate communicates this information, the resignation can be rescinded.

Valete,

Cato

-- In Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com, "M.CVR.COMPLVTENSIS " <complutensis@ ...> wrote:
>
> M. Curiatius Complutensis Consul M. Valerio Potito S·P·D·
>
> You have said: "I ask the Consuls to allow me to rescind my resignation. "
>
> After consultation with Censors and Praetors I must say that this is not
> possible: the resignation from office is inmediate, there is no waiting
> period. You can stand for election to Quaestor in a new election but you
> cannnot rescind your resignation.
>
> Cura ut valeas
>
> Steve Moore escribió:
> >
> >
> > Salvete.
> >
> >
> >
> > I sincerely appreciate the wise counsel of my cousin, Poplicola, and
> > Senator Cato. To resign is to break an oath sworn before the fierce
> > gods of my gens and my ancestors on behalf of the People of Nova Roma.
> > It would be an act of impiety to break such an oath. My Valerian
> > ancestors worked and fought and died to create the ancient Republic. I
> > would be an unworthy member of this gens if I gave in to my anger and
> > let petty tyrannies prevent me from fulfilling my duty to the People
> > of Nova Roma.
> >
> >
> >
> > That being said, I am reluctant to go back on my decision, made after
> > many abuses to my dignity. Further, I am unwilling to return to a
> > position in which I am treated as nothing more than a scribe, and in
> > which I cannot even voice my concerns about matters in the praetor's
> > office without being shouted down.
> >
> >
> >
> > However, wishing to keep my oath and to be of service to the Republic,
> > I ask the Consuls to allow me to rescind my resignation.
> >
> >
> >
> > M. Valerius Potitus
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ------------ --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- -
> >
> > *From:* Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com [mailto:Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com]
> > *On Behalf Of *Gaius Equitius Cato
> > *Sent:* Thursday, April 09, 2009 10:38 PM
> > *To:* Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com
> > *Subject:* [Nova-Roma] Re: Resignation of Quaestor
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Cato Valerio Potito quaestore sal.
> >
> > Salve, quaestor.
> >
> > I too urge you to rescind your resignation before it becomes official.
> > It is always better to work for improvement from within - I can say
> > this from very personal and recent experience :)
> >
> > Vale,
> >
> > Cato
> >
> > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com <mailto:Nova- Roma%40yahoogrou ps.com>,
> > "Q. Valerius Poplicola" <q.valerius. poplicola@ > wrote:
> > >
> > > Q. Valerius M. Valerio SPD
> > >
> > > Mi frater, I sent you something privately. I ask you, and the
> > Praetores, to
> > > hold off on accepting this resignation until you have read it. I wish
> > you
> > > would consider.
> > >
> > > Cura ut ualeas!
> > >
> >
> >
>

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62858 From: Kristoffer From Date: 2009-04-10
Subject: Re: No Question of Invalid Candidacy
Gaius Equitius Cato wrote:
> My view is, of course, that since I have returned with the 90-day waiting period waived by the Senate in accordance with the law, I have returned "in full" and unrestricted, and since the law specifically says that I "again become eligible" when talking about pursuing an "official position (via election...)", I believe that this allows me to run for office in spite of the six months' time mentioned in the lex Vedia. No magistrate, from censor to consul to praetor, has made any indication publicly that they thought differently.

That is mostly because you are stupid or unwilling to read and
comprehend the laws you yourself quoted.

The "again become eligible" comes from this sentence:

"*THIS LEX* does not *IN ITSELF* restrict a returning Citizen in any way
from lawfully pursuing any entitlements or official positions (via
election or appointment) for which he or she would again become eligible."

I added some subtle emphasis on parts whose significance may have eluded
you. That sentence states that the lex in question does not further
restrict such possibilities. It does NOT repeal or supersede the Lex
Vedia, fully or in part.

/Pius
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62859 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2009-04-10
Subject: Re: Exposing Senate Acts of Illegality!
Interesting - in the post YOU just made...you said as a fellow new citizen - yet in response to my post you act as if you know me. Would you care to enlighten us about how you know about me, since you are a new citizen?

Vale,

Sulla

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "L Julia Aquila" <dis_pensible@...> wrote:
>
> Salve Senator Sulla,
>
> This is quite a long speech Senator. Your performance reminds me of old Rome, stool, stage or soapbox and all; an excellent study in Oratory. I will not slight you in the least though and although I have no intention of rewarding your sense of humor by recognizing your use of comedy: a proclivity you appear to value in yourself. Have you ever thought of writing fiction? You demonstrate an innate ability to do so. Had it not been at the expense of Nova Roma, I might have uttered a silent bravo and a one handed applause being that it lacks polish. Perhaps Senator Maximus could help you further improve your game as he boasts of his proficiency in Role Playing Games, and of course his "success" in Hollywood. However this is not a Role Playing Game. Just wanted to remind you in case you have forgotten Senator Sulla.
>
>
> This does concern a group of notorious Senators, Senator Sulla. Just that you and I may disagree on which group. With the exception of a particular convoluted and ominous and therefore meaningless paragraph from the center of Tribune Aurelianus' statement regarding the Senate and Consulship, from "IÂ… to Consulship."
> I will ask specifics on that question of the obvious author as I want to get it from the horse's mouth so to speak.
> Thank you Senator Sulla, this was illuminating.
>
> Vale
>
> L. Julia Aquila
>
>
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Robert Woolwine" <l_cornelius_sulla@> wrote:
> >
> > Ave,
> >
> > I am extremely glad that some of the information is starting to get reported to the People. I think it is incumbent on the People of Nova Roma to be aware of the words and actions of the Presiding Magistrates of Nova Roma - those that have the power to summon the Senate. I believe it would be beneficial to release specific messages to the review of the People of Nova Roma regarding the now disclosed adjourned Board of Director Meeting earlier this month. Do you know the agenda of the meeting? Do you know why it was adjourned? Do you know what transpired to cause the adjournment? So far to date this has gone completely unreported. Why?
> >
> > Other issues should also be discussed - not just in the Senate but here where the people can voice their opinions and concerns as well. Where is the transparency? Where is the accountability? Our Consul speaks of Obstructionism and Filibustering. Yet, the ML is totally silent on many issues! Why is that? I hope that more information will be released - either in summary form or in a post by post release. The time for transparency is now!
> >
> > Those of us on the Back Alley (who the Consuls would call obstructionists/filibusters) have been at the forefront in trying to have more transparency in Nova Roma. I think it is now incumbent for this message to reach the Main List! You are the People of Nova Roma. You have a right to ask your magistrates what is going on! You have a right to demand to know what actions are going on! Speak up Nova Roma! You have no idea what has been going on and you have a a responsibility to know!!!! You should demand your right to know what has been transpiring!
> >
> > Respectfully,
> >
> > Lucius Cornelius Sulla Felix
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62860 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2009-04-10
Subject: Re: No Question of Invalid Candidacy
Cato Pio sal.

Salve.

Well, apart from the unnecessary reference to my stupidity, thank you for your opinion.

Isn't it odd that I simply ask for opinions *because I fully recognize that I am not quite sure*, and you should take such a nasty little attack stance?

Vale,

Cato



--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Kristoffer From <from@...> wrote:
>
> Gaius Equitius Cato wrote:
> > My view is, of course, that since I have returned with the 90-day waiting period waived by the Senate in accordance with the law, I have returned "in full" and unrestricted, and since the law specifically says that I "again become eligible" when talking about pursuing an "official position (via election...)", I believe that this allows me to run for office in spite of the six months' time mentioned in the lex Vedia. No magistrate, from censor to consul to praetor, has made any indication publicly that they thought differently.
>
> That is mostly because you are stupid or unwilling to read and
> comprehend the laws you yourself quoted.
>
> The "again become eligible" comes from this sentence:
>
> "*THIS LEX* does not *IN ITSELF* restrict a returning Citizen in any way
> from lawfully pursuing any entitlements or official positions (via
> election or appointment) for which he or she would again become eligible."
>
> I added some subtle emphasis on parts whose significance may have eluded
> you. That sentence states that the lex in question does not further
> restrict such possibilities. It does NOT repeal or supersede the Lex
> Vedia, fully or in part.
>
> /Pius
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62861 From: L Julia Aquila Date: 2009-04-10
Subject: Re: Exposing Senate Acts of Illegality!
Salve Senator Sulla,

Interesting that YOU intercept words directed at Tribune Galerius Aurelianus. This too is enlightening. Does this indicate that he speaks for you and those associated with you? One *could* conceivably make that connection. Again as a testament regarding your oratory skills, you neglected to leave out the word "fairly", as in "fairly new".

As for "knowing" you, well thanks to Senator Iulius Caesar and the Ludi of last month, I learned quite a lot about you Senator Sulla. After all don't you take pride in being of a brotherhood who speaks their mind in public Senator Sulla?
How could I not know about you?
This is, after all, your purpose, to be known and to be heard.
I also, as demonstrated here, ask many questions, and many times absence of response is just as significant as an oratory exercise.

Thank you Senator Sulla for your response.

Now I await Tribune Aurelianus own response.

Vale

Julia Aquila


--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Robert Woolwine" <l_cornelius_sulla@...> wrote:
>
> Interesting - in the post YOU just made...you said as a fellow new citizen - yet in response to my post you act as if you know me. Would you care to enlighten us about how you know about me, since you are a new citizen?
>
> Vale,
>
> Sulla
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "L Julia Aquila" <dis_pensible@> wrote:
> >
> > Salve Senator Sulla,
> >
> > This is quite a long speech Senator. Your performance reminds me of old Rome, stool, stage or soapbox and all; an excellent study in Oratory. I will not slight you in the least though and although I have no intention of rewarding your sense of humor by recognizing your use of comedy: a proclivity you appear to value in yourself. Have you ever thought of writing fiction? You demonstrate an innate ability to do so. Had it not been at the expense of Nova Roma, I might have uttered a silent bravo and a one handed applause being that it lacks polish. Perhaps Senator Maximus could help you further improve your game as he boasts of his proficiency in Role Playing Games, and of course his "success" in Hollywood. However this is not a Role Playing Game. Just wanted to remind you in case you have forgotten Senator Sulla.
> >
> >
> > This does concern a group of notorious Senators, Senator Sulla. Just that you and I may disagree on which group. With the exception of a particular convoluted and ominous and therefore meaningless paragraph from the center of Tribune Aurelianus' statement regarding the Senate and Consulship, from "IÂ… to Consulship."
> > I will ask specifics on that question of the obvious author as I want to get it from the horse's mouth so to speak.
> > Thank you Senator Sulla, this was illuminating.
> >
> > Vale
> >
> > L. Julia Aquila
> >
> >
> >
> > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Robert Woolwine" <l_cornelius_sulla@> wrote:
> > >
> > > Ave,
> > >
> > > I am extremely glad that some of the information is starting to get reported to the People. I think it is incumbent on the People of Nova Roma to be aware of the words and actions of the Presiding Magistrates of Nova Roma - those that have the power to summon the Senate. I believe it would be beneficial to release specific messages to the review of the People of Nova Roma regarding the now disclosed adjourned Board of Director Meeting earlier this month. Do you know the agenda of the meeting? Do you know why it was adjourned? Do you know what transpired to cause the adjournment? So far to date this has gone completely unreported. Why?
> > >
> > > Other issues should also be discussed - not just in the Senate but here where the people can voice their opinions and concerns as well. Where is the transparency? Where is the accountability? Our Consul speaks of Obstructionism and Filibustering. Yet, the ML is totally silent on many issues! Why is that? I hope that more information will be released - either in summary form or in a post by post release. The time for transparency is now!
> > >
> > > Those of us on the Back Alley (who the Consuls would call obstructionists/filibusters) have been at the forefront in trying to have more transparency in Nova Roma. I think it is now incumbent for this message to reach the Main List! You are the People of Nova Roma. You have a right to ask your magistrates what is going on! You have a right to demand to know what actions are going on! Speak up Nova Roma! You have no idea what has been going on and you have a a responsibility to know!!!! You should demand your right to know what has been transpiring!
> > >
> > > Respectfully,
> > >
> > > Lucius Cornelius Sulla Felix
> > >
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62862 From: gaius_ambrosius_cunobelinus Date: 2009-04-10
Subject: Re: Exposing Senate Acts of Illegality!
Gaius Ambrosius Cunobelinus Omnibus sal.

As another new (probationary in fact, though I have paid my taxes all the same), I wish to echo L. Julia Aquila's sentiments.

We cannot, as citizens, make good choices and do our duty to the respublica without sufficient information. It's all very dramatic from where I sit, but I see very little substance.

If the Tribune's duty is to inform the citizens, then the Tribune should perhaps look to his duty and inform the citizens clearly and regularly instead of posting vague missives aimed at inciting panic.

If it is traditional for the Tribune to wait to speak until things are in a settled state -- to keep the seal -- he should hold his tongue until it is time to speak rather than speak prematurely.

If the matter is so urgent that it cannot wait, and is so severe that it calls for votes of no confidence, and the sky really is falling as our Tribune says perhaps the circumstances are sufficiently extraordinary that the seal should be broken and concrete details shared.

I too call Tribune Galerius Aurelianus to explain himself.

Vale,
C. Ambrosius Cunobelinus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62863 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2009-04-10
Subject: Re: No Question of Invalid Candidacy
Cato omnibus in foro SPD

Salve.

In re-reading the lex Vedia de cursu honorum which says, in part:

"No individual may assume the office of one of the ordinarii who has not been a registered citizen in good standing for at least six months." (II),

I have just come to the fact that the lex does not say either "consecutive" or "immediately preceding" - only that I would have to be a "citizen in good standing for at least six months." I have long ago fulfilled that requirement. Something to add into the mix.

Valete,

Cato
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62864 From: Kristoffer From Date: 2009-04-10
Subject: Re: No Question of Invalid Candidacy
Gaius Equitius Cato wrote:
> Well, apart from the unnecessary reference to my stupidity, thank you
> for your opinion.

I first typed "unable", but then I decided to just call an apple an
apple. You were either acting stupidly or in a self-serving manner,
refusing to acknowledge what was plainly written.

> I have just come to the fact that the lex does not say either
> "consecutive" or "immediately preceding" - only that I would have to
> be a "citizen in good standing for at least six months."

Guess which of the two possibilities mentioned above this "something"
seems to fall into? To help you further interpret my sometimes vague
speech, I have never believed you to be stupid.

You resigned. Accept the consequences with whatever dignity you have.
Running for a magistracy is not a right - it is a privilege, one that
you scorned and need to, once more, earn.

/Pius
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62865 From: gaiuspopilliuslaenas Date: 2009-04-10
Subject: Re: Exposing Senate Acts of Illegality!
T. Galerius Paulinus C. Popillius Laenas Censores Quirites SPD

As the Censors are responsible for maintaining the roll of the Senate and for the Senate mailing list, we feel it is appropriate to comment on the post by Tribune Ap. Galerius Aurelianus accusing the Senate of illegal acts.

First of all in accordance with our traditions, the Tribunes are present on the Senate list as observers. It is their duty to report to the cives on the agenda put forth by the Consuls and the results of voting and comments of the Senators on such agenda; any disclosure of Senate activities beyond this reporting is inappropriate. It is the prevue of the Consuls to provide additional detail to the cives if they feel it is appropriate to do so.

Specifically, (1) the Tribune states regarding Senate discussions that, "Some of these things would threaten the rights of the people and consequently diminish the role, of the individual Roman citizen to be able to have the representation, that is called for in our Constitution." There have been no such discussions. Even it there had been any such discussions, it would not be illegal. The Senate may debate any matter placed before it by the Consuls. If such an item had been on the Senate agenda, the Tribunes would have reported it. Any change to the Constitution would have to be passed by the people and ratified by two thirds of the Senate.

(2) "I site for one instance that it has been discussed, just how to eliminate the Tribunate of the Plebians and to secure the unrivaled power of Consulship." This is untrue; we know of no such discussions.

(3) There was a meeting of the Board of Directors of Nova Roma, Inc. that was adjourned without a vote because of questions about the procedures under which it was called. Essentially, it was a "non-meeting". It was not adjourned because "no one could agree on anything". The meeting will most likely be reconvened properly at a later date.

(4) There is indeed less than courteous language and sometimes even personal attacks in the Senate. This is to be expected when any group of people are passionate about a subject and yet do not always agree. We, the Censors, believe, this is entirely Roman and historical. While it may be desirable that all Senators always treated each other with politeness and courtesy, it is not a requirement.

(5) "Making deals and agreements without consulting the people". It is the duty of the Senate to do so. The people elect their magistrates and vote laws into effect. The Senate and the magistrates administer the Republic. We invite and expect the cives to vote their consciences in the upcoming and all elections.

Finally, there have been no violations of the law or constitution in the Senate's dealings with or disclosures to the people.

Valete.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62866 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2009-04-10
Subject: Re: No Question of Invalid Candidacy
Cato Pio sal.

Salve.

The question here, Pius, is not one of my stupidity *or* being self-serving. It is a question of the law. If I am going to run, I want it clear that I am within the law to do so. And I want the People from whom I would receive the authority to hold that office to be clear as well.

Again, I think it odd that when someone actually comes forward publicly with a question, seeking the opinion of the People, that you should turn and snipe so mean-spiritedly. It is quite possible to give the opinion you did without being obnoxious. Yet you chose the lower path.

Are we so used to our magistrates acting in huddled secrecy that when a citizen asks a question out in the open it is that alarming?

Vale,

Cato



--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Kristoffer From <from@...> wrote:
>
> Gaius Equitius Cato wrote:
> > Well, apart from the unnecessary reference to my stupidity, thank you
> > for your opinion.
>
> I first typed "unable", but then I decided to just call an apple an
> apple. You were either acting stupidly or in a self-serving manner,
> refusing to acknowledge what was plainly written.
>
> > I have just come to the fact that the lex does not say either
> > "consecutive" or "immediately preceding" - only that I would have to
> > be a "citizen in good standing for at least six months."
>
> Guess which of the two possibilities mentioned above this "something"
> seems to fall into? To help you further interpret my sometimes vague
> speech, I have never believed you to be stupid.
>
> You resigned. Accept the consequences with whatever dignity you have.
> Running for a magistracy is not a right - it is a privilege, one that
> you scorned and need to, once more, earn.
>
> /Pius
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62867 From: L Julia Aquila Date: 2009-04-10
Subject: Re: A Question of Valid Candidacy
Aquila Catoni S.P.D.

Just an observation I find interesting; on one hand you hold others to the strict letter of the Law or Protocol, when you, yourself were relieved of all consequences when you yourself resigned in a dramatic fashion.
This makes me think that you and your brotherhood do exactly what you accuse others of doing in attainment of your own objectives interpreting or reinterpreting the laws to your own ends. Senator Cato I no longer have the confidence in you that I once had, your words hold too many inconsistencies and appear to be in direct opposition to the good of the citizens of the Respublica because they only appear to serve yourself and those you align yourself with.
This is my opinion only.

L. Julia Aquila


--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Gaius Equitius Cato" <mlcinnyc@...> wrote:
>
> C. Equitius Cato omnibus in foro SPD
>
> Salvete.
>
> I have been thinking about this.
>
> The Vedia de cursu honorum says, in part: "No individual may assume the office of one of the ordinarii who has not been a registered citizen in good standing for at least six months." (II)
>
> Since I resigned and have returned, less than six months have passed. What does the law say about returning citizens?
>
> The lex Minucia Moravia de civitate eiuranda says, in part:
>
> "All rights and privileges of citizenship are restored in full to a returning Citizen at the time his or her citizenship is reestablished. This lex does not in itself restrict a returning Citizen in any way from lawfully pursuing any entitlements or official positions (via election or appointment) for which he or she would again become eligible." (VIII.A)
>
> A couple of days a go, I received an email from a citizen named Q. Caecilia Laeta asking if I thought that the waiver of the 90-day period was breaking the law. I answered that it could not possibly be, since the Senate's power to do so is *in* the law: The lex Minucia Moravia de civitate eiuranda also says: "At the discretion of the Senate, the normal waiting period of ninety (90) days may be waived." (VIII.B)
>
> My view is, of course, that since I have returned with the 90-day waiting period waived by the Senate in accordance with the law, I have returned "in full" and unrestricted, and since the law specifically says that I "again become eligible" when talking about pursuing an "official position (via election...)", I believe that this allows me to run for office in spite of the six months' time mentioned in the lex Vedia. No magistrate, from censor to consul to praetor, has made any indication publicly that they thought differently.
>
> So I ask you, the People: what do you think? Should I seek office now, as I believe I am entitled to do, or should I wait, because there is the hint of a question? There are two other candidates for the office I seek, so it's not like the vacancy will continue either way.
>
> Valete,
>
> Cato
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62868 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2009-04-10
Subject: Re: Exposing Senate Acts of Illegality!
Aquilia, you cannot have it both ways - either you are a new citizen who is unfamiliar with NR - or you have been advised by certain individuals about certain other individuals.

In the back alley we had this very discussion with Cornelius Lentulus and he named a slew of names of individuals who have taken it upon themselves to spread rumors and innuendo. Are you one of those who has been informed in such a manner - considering as you said to the Tribune - you are a fairly new member to Nova Roma?

Vale,

Sulla

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "L Julia Aquila" <dis_pensible@...> wrote:
>
> Salve Senator Sulla,
>
> Interesting that YOU intercept words directed at Tribune Galerius Aurelianus. This too is enlightening. Does this indicate that he speaks for you and those associated with you? One *could* conceivably make that connection. Again as a testament regarding your oratory skills, you neglected to leave out the word "fairly", as in "fairly new".
>
> As for "knowing" you, well thanks to Senator Iulius Caesar and the Ludi of last month, I learned quite a lot about you Senator Sulla. After all don't you take pride in being of a brotherhood who speaks their mind in public Senator Sulla?
> How could I not know about you?
> This is, after all, your purpose, to be known and to be heard.
> I also, as demonstrated here, ask many questions, and many times absence of response is just as significant as an oratory exercise.
>
> Thank you Senator Sulla for your response.
>
> Now I await Tribune Aurelianus own response.
>
> Vale
>
> Julia Aquila
>
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Robert Woolwine" <l_cornelius_sulla@> wrote:
> >
> > Interesting - in the post YOU just made...you said as a fellow new citizen - yet in response to my post you act as if you know me. Would you care to enlighten us about how you know about me, since you are a new citizen?
> >
> > Vale,
> >
> > Sulla
> >
> > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "L Julia Aquila" <dis_pensible@> wrote:
> > >
> > > Salve Senator Sulla,
> > >
> > > This is quite a long speech Senator. Your performance reminds me of old Rome, stool, stage or soapbox and all; an excellent study in Oratory. I will not slight you in the least though and although I have no intention of rewarding your sense of humor by recognizing your use of comedy: a proclivity you appear to value in yourself. Have you ever thought of writing fiction? You demonstrate an innate ability to do so. Had it not been at the expense of Nova Roma, I might have uttered a silent bravo and a one handed applause being that it lacks polish. Perhaps Senator Maximus could help you further improve your game as he boasts of his proficiency in Role Playing Games, and of course his "success" in Hollywood. However this is not a Role Playing Game. Just wanted to remind you in case you have forgotten Senator Sulla.
> > >
> > >
> > > This does concern a group of notorious Senators, Senator Sulla. Just that you and I may disagree on which group. With the exception of a particular convoluted and ominous and therefore meaningless paragraph from the center of Tribune Aurelianus' statement regarding the Senate and Consulship, from "IÂ… to Consulship."
> > > I will ask specifics on that question of the obvious author as I want to get it from the horse's mouth so to speak.
> > > Thank you Senator Sulla, this was illuminating.
> > >
> > > Vale
> > >
> > > L. Julia Aquila
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Robert Woolwine" <l_cornelius_sulla@> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Ave,
> > > >
> > > > I am extremely glad that some of the information is starting to get reported to the People. I think it is incumbent on the People of Nova Roma to be aware of the words and actions of the Presiding Magistrates of Nova Roma - those that have the power to summon the Senate. I believe it would be beneficial to release specific messages to the review of the People of Nova Roma regarding the now disclosed adjourned Board of Director Meeting earlier this month. Do you know the agenda of the meeting? Do you know why it was adjourned? Do you know what transpired to cause the adjournment? So far to date this has gone completely unreported. Why?
> > > >
> > > > Other issues should also be discussed - not just in the Senate but here where the people can voice their opinions and concerns as well. Where is the transparency? Where is the accountability? Our Consul speaks of Obstructionism and Filibustering. Yet, the ML is totally silent on many issues! Why is that? I hope that more information will be released - either in summary form or in a post by post release. The time for transparency is now!
> > > >
> > > > Those of us on the Back Alley (who the Consuls would call obstructionists/filibusters) have been at the forefront in trying to have more transparency in Nova Roma. I think it is now incumbent for this message to reach the Main List! You are the People of Nova Roma. You have a right to ask your magistrates what is going on! You have a right to demand to know what actions are going on! Speak up Nova Roma! You have no idea what has been going on and you have a a responsibility to know!!!! You should demand your right to know what has been transpiring!
> > > >
> > > > Respectfully,
> > > >
> > > > Lucius Cornelius Sulla Felix
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62869 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2009-04-10
Subject: Re: Exposing Senate Acts of Illegality!
Censor -

If the board meeting was adjourned - why was it adjourned? If the board meeting that was adjourned - reached the point of voting and completed - as previous senate meetings are - would the board meeting be violating the law? Why?

Vale,

Lucius Cornelius Sulla Felix


--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "gaiuspopilliuslaenas" <gaiuspopillius@...> wrote:
>
> T. Galerius Paulinus C. Popillius Laenas Censores Quirites SPD
>
> As the Censors are responsible for maintaining the roll of the Senate and for the Senate mailing list, we feel it is appropriate to comment on the post by Tribune Ap. Galerius Aurelianus accusing the Senate of illegal acts.
>
> First of all in accordance with our traditions, the Tribunes are present on the Senate list as observers. It is their duty to report to the cives on the agenda put forth by the Consuls and the results of voting and comments of the Senators on such agenda; any disclosure of Senate activities beyond this reporting is inappropriate. It is the prevue of the Consuls to provide additional detail to the cives if they feel it is appropriate to do so.
>
> Specifically, (1) the Tribune states regarding Senate discussions that, "Some of these things would threaten the rights of the people and consequently diminish the role, of the individual Roman citizen to be able to have the representation, that is called for in our Constitution." There have been no such discussions. Even it there had been any such discussions, it would not be illegal. The Senate may debate any matter placed before it by the Consuls. If such an item had been on the Senate agenda, the Tribunes would have reported it. Any change to the Constitution would have to be passed by the people and ratified by two thirds of the Senate.
>
> (2) "I site for one instance that it has been discussed, just how to eliminate the Tribunate of the Plebians and to secure the unrivaled power of Consulship." This is untrue; we know of no such discussions.
>
> (3) There was a meeting of the Board of Directors of Nova Roma, Inc. that was adjourned without a vote because of questions about the procedures under which it was called. Essentially, it was a "non-meeting". It was not adjourned because "no one could agree on anything". The meeting will most likely be reconvened properly at a later date.
>
> (4) There is indeed less than courteous language and sometimes even personal attacks in the Senate. This is to be expected when any group of people are passionate about a subject and yet do not always agree. We, the Censors, believe, this is entirely Roman and historical. While it may be desirable that all Senators always treated each other with politeness and courtesy, it is not a requirement.
>
> (5) "Making deals and agreements without consulting the people". It is the duty of the Senate to do so. The people elect their magistrates and vote laws into effect. The Senate and the magistrates administer the Republic. We invite and expect the cives to vote their consciences in the upcoming and all elections.
>
> Finally, there have been no violations of the law or constitution in the Senate's dealings with or disclosures to the people.
>
> Valete.
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62870 From: Gaius Vipsanius Agrippa Date: 2009-04-10
Subject: Call for candidates
Salvete

This is the second call for candidates for election to the vacant office of plebian aedile.

Candidates for aedilis plebis must be citizens in good standing for at least six full months before taking office. They must be of the plebeian order, assidui, and at least 21 years of age by the date of taking office.

I intend to hold the election from April 26 to April 30.

You may declare your candidacy by posting to the mailing lists
nova-roma@yahoogroups.com AND comitiaplebistributa@yahoogroups.com

May the Gods grant the best of luck to all whom are willing to serve our
Republic!

Gaius Vipsanius Agrippa
Tribune of the Plebs
Senator
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62871 From: Kristoffer From Date: 2009-04-10
Subject: McCarthyism (Was: Exposing Senate Acts of Illegality!)
Robert Woolwine wrote:
> In the back alley we had this very discussion with Cornelius Lentulus and he named a slew of names of individuals who have taken it upon themselves to spread rumors and innuendo. Are you one of those who has been informed in such a manner - considering as you said to the Tribune - you are a fairly new member to Nova Roma?
>

" I have here in my hand a list of names that were made known to the
Secretary of State as being members of the Communist Party and who
nevertheless are still working and shaping policy in the State Department."

"Are you now, or have you ever been, a member of the Communist Party?"

/Pius
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62872 From: L Julia Aquila Date: 2009-04-10
Subject: Re: Exposing Senate Acts of Illegality!
Salve Senator Sulla,

Nice try but latching on to simple words such as "fairly new" is just another oratory skill that even the worst used car salesmen learn without even a sales 101 course.
Thank you to illuminating for us, once again, that you often have very little to go and so you make so much of two little words.
Thank you also for demonstrating that you did not bother to read my response to you as to how I came about my information, apparently ignoring it, to push forward your own agenda.

Is this the way you treat the citizens of Nova Roma?

It appears to me it may not be the citizens of Nova Roma you wish to serve, but possibly, just possibly, the members of the Back Alley as you seem to direct your conversation to that ML quite a bit.

I ask the citizens of Nova Roma to take note.

How enlightening indeed.

Vale,

L. Julia Aquila

P.S. It is Aquila Sir, not Aquilia. I am of the opinion that you pride yourself on paying attention to detail, does this not apply to a regular citizen?


--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Robert Woolwine" <l_cornelius_sulla@...> wrote:
>
> Aquilia, you cannot have it both ways - either you are a new citizen who is unfamiliar with NR - or you have been advised by certain individuals about certain other individuals.
>
> In the back alley we had this very discussion with Cornelius Lentulus and he named a slew of names of individuals who have taken it upon themselves to spread rumors and innuendo. Are you one of those who has been informed in such a manner - considering as you said to the Tribune - you are a fairly new member to Nova Roma?
>
> Vale,
>
> Sulla
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "L Julia Aquila" <dis_pensible@> wrote:
> >
> > Salve Senator Sulla,
> >
> > Interesting that YOU intercept words directed at Tribune Galerius Aurelianus. This too is enlightening. Does this indicate that he speaks for you and those associated with you? One *could* conceivably make that connection. Again as a testament regarding your oratory skills, you neglected to leave out the word "fairly", as in "fairly new".
> >
> > As for "knowing" you, well thanks to Senator Iulius Caesar and the Ludi of last month, I learned quite a lot about you Senator Sulla. After all don't you take pride in being of a brotherhood who speaks their mind in public Senator Sulla?
> > How could I not know about you?
> > This is, after all, your purpose, to be known and to be heard.
> > I also, as demonstrated here, ask many questions, and many times absence of response is just as significant as an oratory exercise.
> >
> > Thank you Senator Sulla for your response.
> >
> > Now I await Tribune Aurelianus own response.
> >
> > Vale
> >
> > Julia Aquila
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62873 From: Gnaeus Iulius Caesar Date: 2009-04-10
Subject: Re: A Question of Valid Candidacy
Attachments :
    Cn. Iulius Caesar L. Iuliae Aquilae SPD
     
    Determining what is or isn't "to the good of the citizens of the Respublica" is a dangerous path to tread. It can lead to assumptions being made about what is good for people and actions are then taken based on those assumptions. Ultimately only the people in comitia can decide what is good for them - or not - by voting on laws or candidates. We can all have opinions on what is best for Nova Roma, but the natural extension of that particular Rubicon can be seen in last year's flawed, illegal and unconstitutional "trials". We go from what we think is best for people, to acts that are in support of that, which can break or bend laws and in defense of that advance the spurious claim that illegality and unconstitutional acts are justified by the greater good. That is never the case, for the law is the law is the law.
     
    Rather than subjective claims about the good of the people, we are far better to concentrate on what the laws, the written laws, of Nova Roma say or don't say. These laws are the extension of the will of the people, who have determined what is good for them. We can campaign to have laws and the constitution changed, but this is an expression of their will - a concrete one. Now of course, we may differ over interpretations of the law, but a far safer foundation to stand on is the law rather than individual subjective judgments as to what is good for people.
     
    Of course, this is just my subjective view too Winking smile emoticon
     
    Optime vale.
     
    Sent: Friday, April 10, 2009 8:39 AM
    Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: A Question of Valid Candidacy

    Aquila Catoni S.P.D.

    Just an observation I find interesting; on one hand you hold others to the strict letter of the Law or Protocol, when you, yourself were relieved of all consequences when you yourself resigned in a dramatic fashion.
    This makes me think that you and your brotherhood do exactly what you accuse others of doing in attainment of your own objectives interpreting or reinterpreting the laws to your own ends. Senator Cato I no longer have the confidence in you that I once had, your words hold too many inconsistencies and appear to be in direct opposition to the good of the citizens of the Respublica because they only appear to serve yourself and those you align yourself with.
    This is my opinion only.

    L. Julia Aquila


    --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Gaius Equitius Cato" <mlcinnyc@...> wrote:
    >
    > C. Equitius Cato
    omnibus in foro SPD
    >
    > Salvete.
    >
    > I have been
    thinking about this. 
    >
    > The Vedia de cursu honorum says, in
    part: "No individual may assume the office of one of the ordinarii who has not been a registered citizen in good standing for at least six months." (II)
    >
    > Since I resigned and have returned, less than six months
    have passed.  What does the law say about returning citizens?
    >
    > The lex Minucia Moravia de civitate eiuranda says, in part:
    >
    > "All rights and privileges of citizenship are restored in full to a
    returning Citizen at the time his or her citizenship is reestablished. This lex does not in itself restrict a returning Citizen in any way from lawfully pursuing any entitlements or official positions (via election or appointment) for which he or she would again become eligible." (VIII.A)
    >
    > A
    couple of days a go, I received an email from a citizen named Q. Caecilia Laeta asking if I thought that the waiver of the 90-day period was breaking the law.  I answered that it could not possibly be, since the Senate's power to do so is *in* the law: The lex Minucia Moravia de civitate eiuranda also says: "At the discretion of the Senate, the normal waiting period of ninety (90) days may be waived." (VIII.B)
    >
    > My view is, of course, that since I
    have returned with the 90-day waiting period waived by the Senate in accordance with the law, I have returned "in full" and unrestricted, and since the law specifically says that I "again become eligible" when talking about pursuing an "official position (via election...)", I believe that this allows me to run for office in spite of the six months' time mentioned in the lex Vedia.  No magistrate, from censor to consul to praetor, has made any indication publicly that they thought differently.
    >
    > So I ask you, the People: what
    do you think?  Should I seek office now, as I believe I am entitled to do, or should I wait, because there is the hint of a question?  There are two other candidates for the office I seek, so it's not like the vacancy will continue either way.
    >
    > Valete,
    >
    >
    Cato
    >




    ------------------------------------

    Yahoo! Groups Links

    <*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
        http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma/

    <*> Your email settings:
        Individual Email | Traditional

    <*> To change settings online go to:
        http://groups.yahoo..com/group/Nova-Roma/join
        (Yahoo! ID required)

    <*> To change settings via email:
        mailto:Nova-Roma-digest@yahoogroups.com
        mailto:Nova-Roma-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com

    <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
        Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

    <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
        http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
    Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62874 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2009-04-10
    Subject: Re: Exposing Senate Acts of Illegality!
    Nice try at deflection - But, it didn't fool me nor do I doubt the people of Nova Roma - but you get a A for effort! ;)

    Vale,

    Sulla


    --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "L Julia Aquila" <dis_pensible@...> wrote:
    >
    > Salve Senator Sulla,
    >
    > Nice try but latching on to simple words such as "fairly new" is just another oratory skill that even the worst used car salesmen learn without even a sales 101 course.
    > Thank you to illuminating for us, once again, that you often have very little to go and so you make so much of two little words.
    > Thank you also for demonstrating that you did not bother to read my response to you as to how I came about my information, apparently ignoring it, to push forward your own agenda.
    >
    > Is this the way you treat the citizens of Nova Roma?
    >
    > It appears to me it may not be the citizens of Nova Roma you wish to serve, but possibly, just possibly, the members of the Back Alley as you seem to direct your conversation to that ML quite a bit.
    >
    > I ask the citizens of Nova Roma to take note.
    >
    > How enlightening indeed.
    >
    > Vale,
    >
    > L. Julia Aquila
    >
    > P.S. It is Aquila Sir, not Aquilia. I am of the opinion that you pride yourself on paying attention to detail, does this not apply to a regular citizen?
    >
    >
    > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Robert Woolwine" <l_cornelius_sulla@> wrote:
    > >
    > > Aquilia, you cannot have it both ways - either you are a new citizen who is unfamiliar with NR - or you have been advised by certain individuals about certain other individuals.
    > >
    > > In the back alley we had this very discussion with Cornelius Lentulus and he named a slew of names of individuals who have taken it upon themselves to spread rumors and innuendo. Are you one of those who has been informed in such a manner - considering as you said to the Tribune - you are a fairly new member to Nova Roma?
    > >
    > > Vale,
    > >
    > > Sulla
    > >
    > > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "L Julia Aquila" <dis_pensible@> wrote:
    > > >
    > > > Salve Senator Sulla,
    > > >
    > > > Interesting that YOU intercept words directed at Tribune Galerius Aurelianus. This too is enlightening. Does this indicate that he speaks for you and those associated with you? One *could* conceivably make that connection. Again as a testament regarding your oratory skills, you neglected to leave out the word "fairly", as in "fairly new".
    > > >
    > > > As for "knowing" you, well thanks to Senator Iulius Caesar and the Ludi of last month, I learned quite a lot about you Senator Sulla. After all don't you take pride in being of a brotherhood who speaks their mind in public Senator Sulla?
    > > > How could I not know about you?
    > > > This is, after all, your purpose, to be known and to be heard.
    > > > I also, as demonstrated here, ask many questions, and many times absence of response is just as significant as an oratory exercise.
    > > >
    > > > Thank you Senator Sulla for your response.
    > > >
    > > > Now I await Tribune Aurelianus own response.
    > > >
    > > > Vale
    > > >
    > > > Julia Aquila
    >
    Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62875 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2009-04-10
    Subject: Totalitarian TPTB Vs Re: McCarthyism (Was: Exposing Senate
    Well it sure seems all the angles are represented in Nova Roma - given my moderation on the ML by the totalitarian clique of the Praetors office. I guess if we need a Communist wing in NR the conservative needs to be just as represented. Don't you think? At least my side doesn't - you know - break the laws and bylaws of Nova Roma or Maine law!

    Vale,

    Sulla


    --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Kristoffer From <from@...> wrote:
    >
    > Robert Woolwine wrote:
    > > In the back alley we had this very discussion with Cornelius Lentulus and he named a slew of names of individuals who have taken it upon themselves to spread rumors and innuendo. Are you one of those who has been informed in such a manner - considering as you said to the Tribune - you are a fairly new member to Nova Roma?
    > >
    >
    > " I have here in my hand a list of names that were made known to the
    > Secretary of State as being members of the Communist Party and who
    > nevertheless are still working and shaping policy in the State Department."
    >
    > "Are you now, or have you ever been, a member of the Communist Party?"
    >
    > /Pius
    >
    Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62876 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2009-04-10
    Subject: Moderation policy
    Robert Woolwine <l_cornelius_sulla@...> writes:

    [...]
    > given my moderation on the ML by the totalitarian clique of the
    > Praetors office.

    You are in a moderated status for the same reason everyone else who
    joins the Nova Roma mailing list joins under moderation. It is the
    stated policy and has been for many years. Given that your posts have
    all been approved thus far, I think our actions speak for themselves.


    CN-EQVIT-MARINVS
    Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62877 From: L Julia Aquila Date: 2009-04-10
    Subject: Re: A Question of Valid Candidacy
    L. Iulia Aquila Cn. Iulius Caesar S.P.D.

    Senator Caesar, Senator Cato asked questions of the citizens of Nova Roma and I obliged as a loyal and obedient citizen to answer him.
    I ask you this then, when you say I am taking a dangerous path, is this a warning designed to silence my opinion?
    How can we know what the good, or otherwise, people of the Respublica want when they cannot express themselves or answer a question posed by a Senator of Nova Roma?
    Perhaps then Senator Caesar, Senator Cato should have been more specific in who may answer his query and what types of answers are accepted.
    Should it not be representative of what is on the minds and hearts of the people to serve the Respublica in the best way possible? The comitia after all are assemblies of the citizens. The Magistrates are therefore elected by the citizens, and the Senators are appointed based on their service to the respublica, ideally working thier way up the cursus honorum being elected by the people as they ascend that ladder.

    I make no claims Senator,for anyone else but myself, my perceptions are based on demonstrable, objective observations and facts. I make statements based on these observations and I ask questions based on such observation. It is not a determination for anyone other than myself, I have the utmost faith that my fellow citizens can make up their own minds.

    Thank you, Senator, for affirming to me and to those readin this that your view on the interpretation of the law is subjective also.

    The fact that you responded to my posts is also indicative that I just may be on the right track Sir. Thank you for that Senator Caesar.

    Vale optimé,

    L. Julia Aquila


    --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Gnaeus Iulius Caesar" <gn_iulius_caesar@...> wrote:
    >
    > Cn. Iulius Caesar L. Iuliae Aquilae SPD
    >
    > Determining what is or isn't "to the good of the citizens of the Respublica" is a dangerous path to tread. It can lead to assumptions being made about what is good for people and actions are then taken based on those assumptions. Ultimately only the people in comitia can decide what is good for them - or not - by voting on laws or candidates. We can all have opinions on what is best for Nova Roma, but the natural extension of that particular Rubicon can be seen in last year's flawed, illegal and unconstitutional "trials". We go from what we think is best for people, to acts that are in support of that, which can break or bend laws and in defense of that advance the spurious claim that illegality and unconstitutional acts are justified by the greater good. That is never the case, for the law is the law is the law.
    >
    > Rather than subjective claims about the good of the people, we are far better to concentrate on what the laws, the written laws, of Nova Roma say or don't say. These laws are the extension of the will of the people, who have determined what is good for them. We can campaign to have laws and the constitution changed, but this is an expression of their will - a concrete one. Now of course, we may differ over interpretations of the law, but a far safer foundation to stand on is the law rather than individual subjective judgments as to what is good for people.
    >
    > Of course, this is just my subjective view too
    >
    > Optime vale.
    >
    > From: L Julia Aquila
    > Sent: Friday, April 10, 2009 8:39 AM
    > To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
    > Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: A Question of Valid Candidacy
    >
    >
    > Aquila Catoni S.P.D.
    >
    > Just an observation I find interesting; on one hand you hold others to the strict letter of the Law or Protocol, when you, yourself were relieved of all consequences when you yourself resigned in a dramatic fashion.
    > This makes me think that you and your brotherhood do exactly what you accuse others of doing in attainment of your own objectives interpreting or reinterpreting the laws to your own ends. Senator Cato I no longer have the confidence in you that I once had, your words hold too many inconsistencies and appear to be in direct opposition to the good of the citizens of the Respublica because they only appear to serve yourself and those you align yourself with.
    > This is my opinion only.
    >
    > L. Julia Aquila
    >
    >
    > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Gaius Equitius Cato" <mlcinnyc@> wrote:
    > >
    > > C. Equitius Cato omnibus in foro SPD
    > >
    > > Salvete.
    > >
    > > I have been thinking about this.
    > >
    > > The Vedia de cursu honorum says, in part: "No individual may assume the office of one of the ordinarii who has not been a registered citizen in good standing for at least six months." (II)
    > >
    > > Since I resigned and have returned, less than six months have passed. What does the law say about returning citizens?
    > >
    > > The lex Minucia Moravia de civitate eiuranda says, in part:
    > >
    > > "All rights and privileges of citizenship are restored in full to a returning Citizen at the time his or her citizenship is reestablished. This lex does not in itself restrict a returning Citizen in any way from lawfully pursuing any entitlements or official positions (via election or appointment) for which he or she would again become eligible." (VIII.A)
    > >
    > > A couple of days a go, I received an email from a citizen named Q. Caecilia Laeta asking if I thought that the waiver of the 90-day period was breaking the law. I answered that it could not possibly be, since the Senate's power to do so is *in* the law: The lex Minucia Moravia de civitate eiuranda also says: "At the discretion of the Senate, the normal waiting period of ninety (90) days may be waived." (VIII.B)
    > >
    > > My view is, of course, that since I have returned with the 90-day waiting period waived by the Senate in accordance with the law, I have returned "in full" and unrestricted, and since the law specifically says that I "again become eligible" when talking about pursuing an "official position (via election...)", I believe that this allows me to run for office in spite of the six months' time mentioned in the lex Vedia. No magistrate, from censor to consul to praetor, has made any indication publicly that they thought differently.
    > >
    > > So I ask you, the People: what do you think? Should I seek office now, as I believe I am entitled to do, or should I wait, because there is the hint of a question? There are two other candidates for the office I seek, so it's not like the vacancy will continue either way.
    > >
    > > Valete,
    > >
    > > Cato
    > >
    >
    >
    >
    >
    > ------------------------------------
    >
    > Yahoo! Groups Links
    >
    Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62878 From: L Julia Aquila Date: 2009-04-10
    Subject: Re: Exposing Senate Acts of Illegality!
    Salve Senator Sulla,

    I agree. I think the citizens see exactly what is going on.
    You once again demonstrated your oratorical skill in the technique of deflection very clearly.
    This is no laughing matter Senator, this is no Role Playing Game, this is serious.

    Again I implore the good citizens of Nova Roma to take note.

    Vale,

    L. Julia Aquila


    --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Robert Woolwine" <l_cornelius_sulla@...> wrote:
    >
    > Nice try at deflection - But, it didn't fool me nor do I doubt the people of Nova Roma - but you get a A for effort! ;)
    >
    > Vale,
    >
    > Sulla
    >
    >
    > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "L Julia Aquila" <dis_pensible@> wrote:
    > >
    > > Salve Senator Sulla,
    > >
    > > Nice try but latching on to simple words such as "fairly new" is just another oratory skill that even the worst used car salesmen learn without even a sales 101 course.
    > > Thank you to illuminating for us, once again, that you often have very little to go and so you make so much of two little words.
    > > Thank you also for demonstrating that you did not bother to read my response to you as to how I came about my information, apparently ignoring it, to push forward your own agenda.
    > >
    > > Is this the way you treat the citizens of Nova Roma?
    > >
    > > It appears to me it may not be the citizens of Nova Roma you wish to serve, but possibly, just possibly, the members of the Back Alley as you seem to direct your conversation to that ML quite a bit.
    > >
    > > I ask the citizens of Nova Roma to take note.
    > >
    > > How enlightening indeed.
    > >
    > > Vale,
    > >
    > > L. Julia Aquila
    > >
    > > P.S. It is Aquila Sir, not Aquilia. I am of the opinion that you pride yourself on paying attention to detail, does this not apply to a regular citizen?
    > >
    > >
    > > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Robert Woolwine" <l_cornelius_sulla@> wrote:
    > > >
    > > > Aquilia, you cannot have it both ways - either you are a new citizen who is unfamiliar with NR - or you have been advised by certain individuals about certain other individuals.
    > > >
    > > > In the back alley we had this very discussion with Cornelius Lentulus and he named a slew of names of individuals who have taken it upon themselves to spread rumors and innuendo. Are you one of those who has been informed in such a manner - considering as you said to the Tribune - you are a fairly new member to Nova Roma?
    > > >
    > > > Vale,
    > > >
    > > > Sulla
    > > >
    > > > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "L Julia Aquila" <dis_pensible@> wrote:
    > > > >
    > > > > Salve Senator Sulla,
    > > > >
    > > > > Interesting that YOU intercept words directed at Tribune Galerius Aurelianus. This too is enlightening. Does this indicate that he speaks for you and those associated with you? One *could* conceivably make that connection. Again as a testament regarding your oratory skills, you neglected to leave out the word "fairly", as in "fairly new".
    > > > >
    > > > > As for "knowing" you, well thanks to Senator Iulius Caesar and the Ludi of last month, I learned quite a lot about you Senator Sulla. After all don't you take pride in being of a brotherhood who speaks their mind in public Senator Sulla?
    > > > > How could I not know about you?
    > > > > This is, after all, your purpose, to be known and to be heard.
    > > > > I also, as demonstrated here, ask many questions, and many times absence of response is just as significant as an oratory exercise.
    > > > >
    > > > > Thank you Senator Sulla for your response.
    > > > >
    > > > > Now I await Tribune Aurelianus own response.
    > > > >
    > > > > Vale
    > > > >
    > > > > Julia Aquila
    > >
    >
    Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62879 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2009-04-10
    Subject: Re: A Question of Valid Candidacy
    Cato Iuliae Aquilae sal.

    Salve.

    Just out of curiosity, Iulia Aquila, in what sense is my bringing this question before the People - you - complete with my own interpretation of the laws of the res publica, "interpreting the laws to [my] own end", somehow a bad thing? If my "end" is to be able to stand for office without a shadow of impropriety attached to my candidacy, why then yes, that's absolutely true. Is this a surprise? Is this wrong?

    I have laid out the law, and supplied how I view it. That I would believe that it is in my favor is natural, I think; that the possibility that it is not is left open. I have asked the People if *they* - you - think my view is a reasonable one. How is this inconsistent with a declared desire to adhere to the law?

    Vale,

    Cato



    --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "L Julia Aquila" <dis_pensible@...> wrote:
    >
    > Aquila Catoni S.P.D.
    >
    > Just an observation I find interesting; on one hand you hold others to the strict letter of the Law or Protocol, when you, yourself were relieved of all consequences when you yourself resigned in a dramatic fashion.
    > This makes me think that you and your brotherhood do exactly what you accuse others of doing in attainment of your own objectives interpreting or reinterpreting the laws to your own ends. Senator Cato I no longer have the confidence in you that I once had, your words hold too many inconsistencies and appear to be in direct opposition to the good of the citizens of the Respublica because they only appear to serve yourself and those you align yourself with.
    > This is my opinion only.
    >
    > L. Julia Aquila
    >
    >
    > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Gaius Equitius Cato" <mlcinnyc@> wrote:
    > >
    > > C. Equitius Cato omnibus in foro SPD
    > >
    > > Salvete.
    > >
    > > I have been thinking about this.
    > >
    > > The Vedia de cursu honorum says, in part: "No individual may assume the office of one of the ordinarii who has not been a registered citizen in good standing for at least six months." (II)
    > >
    > > Since I resigned and have returned, less than six months have passed. What does the law say about returning citizens?
    > >
    > > The lex Minucia Moravia de civitate eiuranda says, in part:
    > >
    > > "All rights and privileges of citizenship are restored in full to a returning Citizen at the time his or her citizenship is reestablished. This lex does not in itself restrict a returning Citizen in any way from lawfully pursuing any entitlements or official positions (via election or appointment) for which he or she would again become eligible." (VIII.A)
    > >
    > > A couple of days a go, I received an email from a citizen named Q. Caecilia Laeta asking if I thought that the waiver of the 90-day period was breaking the law. I answered that it could not possibly be, since the Senate's power to do so is *in* the law: The lex Minucia Moravia de civitate eiuranda also says: "At the discretion of the Senate, the normal waiting period of ninety (90) days may be waived." (VIII.B)
    > >
    > > My view is, of course, that since I have returned with the 90-day waiting period waived by the Senate in accordance with the law, I have returned "in full" and unrestricted, and since the law specifically says that I "again become eligible" when talking about pursuing an "official position (via election...)", I believe that this allows me to run for office in spite of the six months' time mentioned in the lex Vedia. No magistrate, from censor to consul to praetor, has made any indication publicly that they thought differently.
    > >
    > > So I ask you, the People: what do you think? Should I seek office now, as I believe I am entitled to do, or should I wait, because there is the hint of a question? There are two other candidates for the office I seek, so it's not like the vacancy will continue either way.
    > >
    > > Valete,
    > >
    > > Cato
    > >
    >
    Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62880 From: Gnaeus Iulius Caesar Date: 2009-04-10
    Subject: Re: A Question of Valid Candidacy
    Attachments :
      Cn. Iulius Caesar L. Iuliae Aquilae SPD
       
      If I was going to warn you - I would, clearly. No, it is an observation. My caution is simply that it is a very easy step to interpreting the will of the people, to determining actions to take in support of a subjective judgment, and clearly over the last few years it is becoming even easier for people for then to slip into bending and breaking laws to meet the needs of the moment, all in the name of the people.
       
      I encourage you to speak volumes, for you can without the hindrance or impediment of moderation.
       
      My view is of course subjective Smile emoticon None of us are machines, so pure logic is impossible in the areas of political and social development. We can become pretty logical on issues of law, but again ultimately there is a subjective element. As to what track you are on, I have no idea but I hope it leads you to where you want it to go.
       
      Optime vale

      Sent: Friday, April 10, 2009 10:10 AM
      Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: A Question of Valid Candidacy

      L. Iulia Aquila  Cn. Iulius Caesar S.P.D.

      Senator Caesar, Senator Cato asked questions of the citizens of Nova Roma and I obliged as a loyal and obedient citizen to answer him.
      I ask you this then, when you say I am taking a dangerous path, is this a warning designed to silence my opinion?
      How can we know what the good, or otherwise, people of the Respublica want when they cannot express themselves or answer a question posed by a Senator of Nova Roma?
      Perhaps then Senator Caesar, Senator Cato should have been more specific in who may answer his query and what types of answers are accepted.
      Should it not be representative of what is on the minds and hearts of the people to serve the Respublica in the best way possible? The comitia after all are assemblies of the citizens. The Magistrates are therefore elected by the citizens, and the Senators are appointed based on their service to the respublica, ideally working thier way up the cursus honorum being elected by the people as they ascend that ladder.

      I make no claims Senator,for anyone else but myself, my perceptions are based on demonstrable, objective observations and facts. I make statements based on these observations and I ask questions based on such observation.  It is not a determination for anyone other than myself, I have the utmost faith that my fellow citizens can make up their own minds.

      Thank you, Senator, for affirming to me and to those readin this that your view on the interpretation of the law is subjective also.

      The fact that you responded to my posts is also indicative that I just may be on the right track Sir. Thank you for that Senator Caesar.

      Vale optimé,

      L. Julia Aquila


      --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Gnaeus Iulius Caesar" <gn_iulius_caesar@...> wrote:
      >
      > Cn. Iulius
      Caesar L. Iuliae Aquilae SPD
      >
      > Determining what is or isn't "to
      the good of the citizens of the Respublica" is a dangerous path to tread. It can lead to assumptions being made about what is good for people and actions are then taken based on those assumptions. Ultimately only the people in comitia can decide what is good for them - or not - by voting on laws or candidates. We can all have opinions on what is best for Nova Roma, but the natural extension of that particular Rubicon can be seen in last year's flawed, illegal and unconstitutional "trials". We go from what we think is best for people, to acts that are in support of that, which can break or bend laws and in defense of that advance the spurious claim that illegality and unconstitutional acts are justified by the greater good. That is never the case, for the law is the law is the law.
      >
      > Rather than subjective claims about the good of the
      people, we are far better to concentrate on what the laws, the written laws, of Nova Roma say or don't say. These laws are the extension of the will of the people, who have determined what is good for them. We can campaign to have laws and the constitution changed, but this is an expression of their will - a concrete one. Now of course, we may differ over interpretations of the law, but a far safer foundation to stand on is the law rather than individual subjective judgments as to what is good for people.
      >
      > Of course, this is
      just my subjective view too
      >
      > Optime vale.
      >
      >
      From: L Julia Aquila
      > Sent: Friday, April 10, 2009 8:39 AM
      > To:
      Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
      > Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: A Question of Valid Candidacy
      >
      >
      > Aquila Catoni S.P.D.
      >
      > Just an observation I find
      interesting; on one hand you hold others to the strict letter of the Law or Protocol, when you, yourself were relieved of all consequences when you yourself resigned in a dramatic fashion.
      > This makes me think that you and your
      brotherhood do exactly what you accuse others of doing in attainment of your own objectives interpreting or reinterpreting the laws to your own ends. Senator Cato I no longer have the confidence in you that I once had, your words hold too many inconsistencies and appear to be in direct opposition to the good of the citizens of the Respublica because they only appear to serve yourself and those you align yourself with.
      > This is my opinion only.
      >
      > L.
      Julia Aquila
      >
      >
      > --- In
      href="mailto:Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com">Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Gaius Equitius Cato" <mlcinnyc@> wrote:
      > >
      > > C. Equitius
      Cato omnibus in foro SPD
      > >
      > > Salvete.
      > >
      > > I have been thinking about this. 
      > >
      > >
      The Vedia de cursu honorum says, in part: "No individual may assume the office of one of the ordinarii who has not been a registered citizen in good standing for at least six months." (II)
      > >
      > > Since I resigned and
      have returned, less than six months have passed.  What does the law say about returning citizens?
      > >
      > > The lex Minucia Moravia de
      civitate eiuranda says, in part:
      > >
      > > "All rights and
      privileges of citizenship are restored in full to a returning Citizen at the time his or her citizenship is reestablished. This lex does not in itself restrict a returning Citizen in any way from lawfully pursuing any entitlements or official positions (via election or appointment) for which he or she would again become eligible." (VIII.A)
      > >
      > > A couple of days a
      go, I received an email from a citizen named Q. Caecilia Laeta asking if I thought that the waiver of the 90-day period was breaking the law.  I answered that it could not possibly be, since the Senate's power to do so is *in* the law: The lex Minucia Moravia de civitate eiuranda also says: "At the discretion of the Senate, the normal waiting period of ninety (90) days may be waived." (VIII.B)
      > >
      > > My view is, of course, that since I
      have returned with the 90-day waiting period waived by the Senate in accordance with the law, I have returned "in full" and unrestricted, and since the law specifically says that I "again become eligible" when talking about pursuing an "official position (via election...)", I believe that this allows me to run for office in spite of the six months' time mentioned in the lex Vedia.  No magistrate, from censor to consul to praetor, has made any indication publicly that they thought differently.
      > >
      > > So I ask you, the
      People: what do you think?  Should I seek office now, as I believe I am entitled to do, or should I wait, because there is the hint of a question?  There are two other candidates for the office I seek, so it's not like the vacancy will continue either way.
      > >
      > > Valete,
      > >
      > > Cato
      > >
      >
      >
      >
      >
      >
      ------------------------------------
      >
      > Yahoo! Groups
      Links
      >




      ------------------------------------

      Yahoo! Groups Links

      <*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
          http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma/

      <*> Your email settings:
          Individual Email | Traditional

      <*> To change settings online go to:
          http://groups.yahoo..com/group/Nova-Roma/join
          (Yahoo! ID required)

      <*> To change settings via email:
          mailto:Nova-Roma-digest@yahoogroups.com
          mailto:Nova-Roma-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com

      <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
          Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

      <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
          http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
      Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62881 From: Chantal Gaudiano Date: 2009-04-10
      Subject: Re: L. Coruncanius Cato's candidacy for Aedilis Curulis
      *wry look*
       
      A person who *demands* my vote is not likely to receive it.  I prefer to be asked for my vote, after which I will consider giving it.
       
      Paulla Corva
      Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62882 From: Lucius Coruncanius Cato Date: 2009-04-10
      Subject: Re: NR Disaster Relief Fund / Emergency fund
      Salvete omnes,

      I think that "emergency fund" is more adressed to emergencies 'within' Nova Roma. In any case, it's up to the Senate to decide about this.

      --
      Di te incolumem custodiant.
      L. Coruncanius Cato
      Candidate to Aedilis Curulis

      --- El vie, 10/4/09, enodia2002 <walkyr@...> escribió:

      In looking at the 2009 budget I see that there already exists an "Emergency Fund" with $2000 in it. Would the earthquake relief not be an appropriate cause to donate some portion of that to?

      V Rutilia

      --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com, "vallenporter" <magewuffa@. ..> wrote:
      >
      > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com, Lucius Coruncanius Cato <l.coruncanius_ cato@> wrote:
      > >
      > > Salvete omnes,
      > >
      > > in addition to that, if I might, I would suggest a 'quick response' action, for example make a donation to the Italian Red Cross for the actual quake's relief asap (and by this I mean forgetting for a minute all quarrels in the Senate).
      > >
      > > About the proposal for establishing an emergency fund, these are my two cents (if they aren't already considered yet by Aquila) for anyone wishing to take them to the Senate:
      > >
      > > 1.the fund's purpose should be directed to help and relief NR cives in case of a natural disaster.
      > >
      > > 2. if no NR cives where affected directly, the Senate should decide the best way to use it (international orgs like Red Cross, etc) or not to use it at all.
      > >
      > > 3. In any case, the use of the fund would be public and well known to the people (not only within NR, but also to the beneficiary/ ies and so) in a way that shows clearly that NR is making the action.
      > >
      > > 4. the fund should be fed by a n% of NR cives taxpaying (individual and
      > > those coming directly from province governors), individual donations (public or private), and/or any other way the Senate might find appropriate.
      > >
      > > 5. for this purpose, at least two accounts should be set up. One within US
      > > borders, so NR cives living there can enjoy tax deductions if they
      > > want, and another one within EU borders, so NR cives in EU might do the
      > > same (I think this last one might require some bureaucracy) . Other accounts might be set up, if needed, for other cives in
      > > other parts of the world (south america, etc...). This makes available
      > > propper tax deduction for donnors anywhere they come from, and quicker
      > > responses when a transfer is needed (moving money from one side of an
      > > ocean to another is a lot of paperwork and there is the possibility of
      > > central banks' kidnapping of the sum under suspect of it being 'dirty
      > > money')
      >
      > Salve
      >
      > As we are not in the EU as a legal ORG how do we as NR get a bank acct?to get "propper tax deduction for donnors" we as NR INC have to file a lot of paperwork in the EU as far as I know.we shoul;d look into thsi.
      > I think that to set up a bank acct not in NR names that just sends funds to the red cross NO tax deduction would be much faster.
      > TPTB should talk with our in house CFO.As that would be the one of the Officer of NR would would under the US Law would have to sign off on this whole things.
      > mind you I think a NR Disaster Relief Fund would be nice.
      >
      > Vale
      > Marcus Cornelius felix
      >
      > Sacerdos Templi Mercurius
      >
      >
      >
      >
      >
      >
      >
      >
      >
      > >
      > > As I said, these are my humble five cents.
      > >
      > > --
      > >
      > > Di te incolumem custodiant.
      > >
      > > L. Coruncanius Cato
      > >
      > > --- El jue, 9/4/09, Titus Flavius Aquila <titus.aquila@ > escribió:
      > > De: Titus Flavius Aquila <titus.aquila@ >
      > > Asunto: AW: [Nova-Roma] Re: NR Disaster Relief Fund / Emergency fund
      > > Para: Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com
      > > CC: walkyr@
      > > Fecha: jueves, 9 abril, 2009 7:56
      > >
      > >
      > >
      > >
      > >
      > >
      > >
      > >
      > >
      > >
      > >
      > >
      > >
      > >
      > >
      > >
      > >
      > >
      > > Salve Rutilia,
      > >  
      > > according to my recommendation for establishing an emergency fund, I have it already on the list I will present to the consules for kindly consideration to adding it to the agenda for the next senate session.
      > >  
      > > Thank you for your support
      > >  
      > > Vale bene
      > > Titus Flavius Aquila
      > >
      > >
      > >
      > >
      > >
      > > Von: enodia2002 <walkyr@>
      > > An: Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com
      > > Gesendet: Donnerstag, den 9. April 2009, 05:32:30 Uhr
      > > Betreff: [Nova-Roma] Re: NR Disaster Relief Fund
      > >
      > >
      > >
      > > Salve,
      > >
      > > Thank you, I was indeed misinformed as to the status of the MM project. It would be wonderful to get something like that underway.
      > >
      > > In that case we would need to set up an entirely new fund for disaster relief, and I amend my request to that formal effort.
      > >
      > > Vale,
      > >
      > > Rutilia
      > >
      > > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com, Gnaeus Equitius Marinus <gawne@> wrote:
      > > >
      > > > Salve Rutilia,
      > > >
      > > > enodia2002 <walkyr@> writes:
      > > >
      > > > > V. Rutilia SPD
      > > >
      > > > > It's my understanding that at one time funds were raised for an
      > > > > archeological project that later foundered and the funds remain.
      > > >
      > > > If you're thinking about the Magna Mater project, you've been
      > > > misinformed. While it has not gone as far as I and many others wish,
      > >
      > > > it is not dead. Funds raised for the Magna Mater project remain
      > > > dedicated to that project, especially since they were donated
      > > > explicitly for that project and not to the Nova Roma general fund.
      > > >
      > > > I would not oppose an effort to make a one-time donation from the Nova
      > > > Roma treasury to a reputable disaster relief agency in Italy for
      > > > earthquake relief. In fact I might well donate to it. But that's a
      > > > very different thing from redirecting funds that have already been
      > > > designated for another purpose.
      > > >
      > > > Vale,
      > > >
      > > > CN-EQVIT-MARINVS
      > > >
      > >
      >


      Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62883 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2009-04-10
      Subject: Why am I moderated?
      Ave

      When I joined the ML on Feb 25, 2009.

      I am a Senator/member of the Board of Director,
      Consular (twice),
      Censor (once),
      Former Praetor Urbanus,
      Former Quaestor,
      Lictor of Nova Roma.

      Why am I moderated to this very day?

      Vale,

      Lucius Cornelius Sulla Felix
      Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62884 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2009-04-10
      Subject: Re: Moderation policy
      Really?

      First - how many senators are moderated?

      Second - that is clearly not what the Quaestor has suggested in his resignation statement.

      I think you need to open your cohors list to at the very least the senators so we can see exactly what is going on in your list. If what you say is true and accurate you have nothing to hide. Open your list so that we can see some transparency. Because there is a clear conflict between what you say and Potitus.

      Vale,

      Sulla


      --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Gnaeus Equitius Marinus <gawne@...> wrote:
      >
      > Robert Woolwine <l_cornelius_sulla@...> writes:
      >
      > [...]
      > > given my moderation on the ML by the totalitarian clique of the
      > > Praetors office.
      >
      > You are in a moderated status for the same reason everyone else who
      > joins the Nova Roma mailing list joins under moderation. It is the
      > stated policy and has been for many years. Given that your posts have
      > all been approved thus far, I think our actions speak for themselves.
      >
      >
      > CN-EQVIT-MARINVS
      >
      Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62885 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2009-04-10
      Subject: Re: Exposing Senate Acts of Illegality!
      Ave,

      I am glad you agree!

      I am all for removing the Senate seal. As it is noted by political scientists - let the sun shine in the Senate. The more the people see what is going on - the better educated decisions they can make. And what better way to counter innuendo, gossip and hearsay!

      Vale,

      Sulla

      --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "L Julia Aquila" <dis_pensible@...> wrote:
      >
      > Salve Senator Sulla,
      >
      > I agree. I think the citizens see exactly what is going on.
      > You once again demonstrated your oratorical skill in the technique of deflection very clearly.
      > This is no laughing matter Senator, this is no Role Playing Game, this is serious.
      >
      > Again I implore the good citizens of Nova Roma to take note.
      >
      > Vale,
      >
      > L. Julia Aquila
      >
      >
      > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Robert Woolwine" <l_cornelius_sulla@> wrote:
      > >
      > > Nice try at deflection - But, it didn't fool me nor do I doubt the people of Nova Roma - but you get a A for effort! ;)
      > >
      > > Vale,
      > >
      > > Sulla
      > >
      > >
      > > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "L Julia Aquila" <dis_pensible@> wrote:
      > > >
      > > > Salve Senator Sulla,
      > > >
      > > > Nice try but latching on to simple words such as "fairly new" is just another oratory skill that even the worst used car salesmen learn without even a sales 101 course.
      > > > Thank you to illuminating for us, once again, that you often have very little to go and so you make so much of two little words.
      > > > Thank you also for demonstrating that you did not bother to read my response to you as to how I came about my information, apparently ignoring it, to push forward your own agenda.
      > > >
      > > > Is this the way you treat the citizens of Nova Roma?
      > > >
      > > > It appears to me it may not be the citizens of Nova Roma you wish to serve, but possibly, just possibly, the members of the Back Alley as you seem to direct your conversation to that ML quite a bit.
      > > >
      > > > I ask the citizens of Nova Roma to take note.
      > > >
      > > > How enlightening indeed.
      > > >
      > > > Vale,
      > > >
      > > > L. Julia Aquila
      > > >
      > > > P.S. It is Aquila Sir, not Aquilia. I am of the opinion that you pride yourself on paying attention to detail, does this not apply to a regular citizen?
      > > >
      > > >
      > > > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Robert Woolwine" <l_cornelius_sulla@> wrote:
      > > > >
      > > > > Aquilia, you cannot have it both ways - either you are a new citizen who is unfamiliar with NR - or you have been advised by certain individuals about certain other individuals.
      > > > >
      > > > > In the back alley we had this very discussion with Cornelius Lentulus and he named a slew of names of individuals who have taken it upon themselves to spread rumors and innuendo. Are you one of those who has been informed in such a manner - considering as you said to the Tribune - you are a fairly new member to Nova Roma?
      > > > >
      > > > > Vale,
      > > > >
      > > > > Sulla
      > > > >
      > > > > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "L Julia Aquila" <dis_pensible@> wrote:
      > > > > >
      > > > > > Salve Senator Sulla,
      > > > > >
      > > > > > Interesting that YOU intercept words directed at Tribune Galerius Aurelianus. This too is enlightening. Does this indicate that he speaks for you and those associated with you? One *could* conceivably make that connection. Again as a testament regarding your oratory skills, you neglected to leave out the word "fairly", as in "fairly new".
      > > > > >
      > > > > > As for "knowing" you, well thanks to Senator Iulius Caesar and the Ludi of last month, I learned quite a lot about you Senator Sulla. After all don't you take pride in being of a brotherhood who speaks their mind in public Senator Sulla?
      > > > > > How could I not know about you?
      > > > > > This is, after all, your purpose, to be known and to be heard.
      > > > > > I also, as demonstrated here, ask many questions, and many times absence of response is just as significant as an oratory exercise.
      > > > > >
      > > > > > Thank you Senator Sulla for your response.
      > > > > >
      > > > > > Now I await Tribune Aurelianus own response.
      > > > > >
      > > > > > Vale
      > > > > >
      > > > > > Julia Aquila
      > > >
      > >
      >
      Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62886 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2009-04-10
      Subject: Why am I moderated?
      Ave

      When I joined the ML on Feb 25, 2009.

      I am a Senator/member of the Board of Director,
      Consular (twice),
      Censor (once),
      Former Praetor Urbanus,
      Former Quaestor,
      Lictor of Nova Roma.

      Why am I moderated to this very day?

      Vale,

      Lucius Cornelius Sulla Felix
      Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62887 From: gaiuspopilliuslaenas Date: 2009-04-10
      Subject: Re: NR Disaster Relief Fund / Emergency fund
      --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Lucius Coruncanius Cato <l.coruncanius_cato@...> wrote:
      >
      > Salvete omnes,
      >
      > I think that "emergency fund" is more adressed to emergencies 'within' Nova Roma. In any case, it's up to the Senate to decide about this.


      Salvete omnes,

      That is precisely correct; the emergency fund ie earmarked for internal Nova Roma emergencies.

      Valete,

      C. Popillius Laenas
      Senator
      Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62888 From: L Julia Aquila Date: 2009-04-10
      Subject: Re: A Question of Valid Candidacy
      Aquila Caesari S.P.D.

      Senator, it was clear you made me aware of the danger of a path you apparently were of the opinion I was treading.

      Rather than volumes I prefer to make concise and precise statements based on critical thought and logic taking into account the human condition and the all the variables associated with that which I am considering. Thank you for the encouragement Senator Caesar.

      Senator, from your statement I understand that you do consider the human condition as you state none of us are machines.
      Logic is dependant on many variables, so there is no such thing as pure logic as it is a process of reasoning. Nor is logic solely based upon theoretical suppositions whether subjective or objective, if is also based on observable facts and a variety of circumstances, the thought processes, deductive/inductive reasoning, all of which leads us naturally to very human conclusions and to express the resultant premise. This is also known as human judgment and integral to each individual negotiating his/her world and contributing to it.

      Thank you for your time

      Optime vale,

      Julia Aquila



      --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Gnaeus Iulius Caesar" <gn_iulius_caesar@...> wrote:
      >
      > Cn. Iulius Caesar L. Iuliae Aquilae SPD
      >
      > If I was going to warn you - I would, clearly. No, it is an observation. My caution is simply that it is a very easy step to interpreting the will of the people, to determining actions to take in support of a subjective judgment, and clearly over the last few years it is becoming even easier for people for then to slip into bending and breaking laws to meet the needs of the moment, all in the name of the people.
      >
      > I encourage you to speak volumes, for you can without the hindrance or impediment of moderation.
      >
      > My view is of course subjective None of us are machines, so pure logic is impossible in the areas of political and social development. We can become pretty logical on issues of law, but again ultimately there is a subjective element. As to what track you are on, I have no idea but I hope it leads you to where you want it to go.
      >
      > Optime vale
      >
      >
      > From: L Julia Aquila
      > Sent: Friday, April 10, 2009 10:10 AM
      > To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
      > Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: A Question of Valid Candidacy
      >
      >
      > L. Iulia Aquila Cn. Iulius Caesar S.P.D.
      >
      > Senator Caesar, Senator Cato asked questions of the citizens of Nova Roma and I obliged as a loyal and obedient citizen to answer him.
      > I ask you this then, when you say I am taking a dangerous path, is this a warning designed to silence my opinion?
      > How can we know what the good, or otherwise, people of the Respublica want when they cannot express themselves or answer a question posed by a Senator of Nova Roma?
      > Perhaps then Senator Caesar, Senator Cato should have been more specific in who may answer his query and what types of answers are accepted.
      > Should it not be representative of what is on the minds and hearts of the people to serve the Respublica in the best way possible? The comitia after all are assemblies of the citizens. The Magistrates are therefore elected by the citizens, and the Senators are appointed based on their service to the respublica, ideally working thier way up the cursus honorum being elected by the people as they ascend that ladder.
      >
      > I make no claims Senator,for anyone else but myself, my perceptions are based on demonstrable, objective observations and facts. I make statements based on these observations and I ask questions based on such observation. It is not a determination for anyone other than myself, I have the utmost faith that my fellow citizens can make up their own minds.
      >
      > Thank you, Senator, for affirming to me and to those readin this that your view on the interpretation of the law is subjective also.
      >
      > The fact that you responded to my posts is also indicative that I just may be on the right track Sir. Thank you for that Senator Caesar.
      >
      > Vale optimé,
      >
      > L. Julia Aquila
      >
      >
      > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Gnaeus Iulius Caesar" <gn_iulius_caesar@> wrote:
      > >
      > > Cn. Iulius Caesar L. Iuliae Aquilae SPD
      > >
      > > Determining what is or isn't "to the good of the citizens of the Respublica" is a dangerous path to tread. It can lead to assumptions being made about what is good for people and actions are then taken based on those assumptions. Ultimately only the people in comitia can decide what is good for them - or not - by voting on laws or candidates. We can all have opinions on what is best for Nova Roma, but the natural extension of that particular Rubicon can be seen in last year's flawed, illegal and unconstitutional "trials". We go from what we think is best for people, to acts that are in support of that, which can break or bend laws and in defense of that advance the spurious claim that illegality and unconstitutional acts are justified by the greater good. That is never the case, for the law is the law is the law.
      > >
      > > Rather than subjective claims about the good of the people, we are far better to concentrate on what the laws, the written laws, of Nova Roma say or don't say. These laws are the extension of the will of the people, who have determined what is good for them. We can campaign to have laws and the constitution changed, but this is an expression of their will - a concrete one. Now of course, we may differ over interpretations of the law, but a far safer foundation to stand on is the law rather than individual subjective judgments as to what is good for people.
      > >
      > > Of course, this is just my subjective view too
      > >
      > > Optime vale.
      > >
      > > From: L Julia Aquila
      > > Sent: Friday, April 10, 2009 8:39 AM
      > > To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
      > > Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: A Question of Valid Candidacy
      > >
      > >
      > > Aquila Catoni S.P.D.
      > >
      > > Just an observation I find interesting; on one hand you hold others to the strict letter of the Law or Protocol, when you, yourself were relieved of all consequences when you yourself resigned in a dramatic fashion.
      > > This makes me think that you and your brotherhood do exactly what you accuse others of doing in attainment of your own objectives interpreting or reinterpreting the laws to your own ends. Senator Cato I no longer have the confidence in you that I once had, your words hold too many inconsistencies and appear to be in direct opposition to the good of the citizens of the Respublica because they only appear to serve yourself and those you align yourself with.
      > > This is my opinion only.
      > >
      > > L. Julia Aquila
      > >
      > >
      > > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Gaius Equitius Cato" <mlcinnyc@> wrote:
      > > >
      > > > C. Equitius Cato omnibus in foro SPD
      > > >
      > > > Salvete.
      > > >
      > > > I have been thinking about this.
      > > >
      > > > The Vedia de cursu honorum says, in part: "No individual may assume the office of one of the ordinarii who has not been a registered citizen in good standing for at least six months." (II)
      > > >
      > > > Since I resigned and have returned, less than six months have passed. What does the law say about returning citizens?
      > > >
      > > > The lex Minucia Moravia de civitate eiuranda says, in part:
      > > >
      > > > "All rights and privileges of citizenship are restored in full to a returning Citizen at the time his or her citizenship is reestablished. This lex does not in itself restrict a returning Citizen in any way from lawfully pursuing any entitlements or official positions (via election or appointment) for which he or she would again become eligible." (VIII.A)
      > > >
      > > > A couple of days a go, I received an email from a citizen named Q. Caecilia Laeta asking if I thought that the waiver of the 90-day period was breaking the law. I answered that it could not possibly be, since the Senate's power to do so is *in* the law: The lex Minucia Moravia de civitate eiuranda also says: "At the discretion of the Senate, the normal waiting period of ninety (90) days may be waived." (VIII.B)
      > > >
      > > > My view is, of course, that since I have returned with the 90-day waiting period waived by the Senate in accordance with the law, I have returned "in full" and unrestricted, and since the law specifically says that I "again become eligible" when talking about pursuing an "official position (via election...)", I believe that this allows me to run for office in spite of the six months' time mentioned in the lex Vedia. No magistrate, from censor to consul to praetor, has made any indication publicly that they thought differently.
      > > >
      > > > So I ask you, the People: what do you think? Should I seek office now, as I believe I am entitled to do, or should I wait, because there is the hint of a question? There are two other candidates for the office I seek, so it's not like the vacancy will continue either way.
      > > >
      > > > Valete,
      > > >
      > > > Cato
      > > >
      > >
      > >
      > >
      > >
      > > ------------------------------------
      > >
      > > Yahoo! Groups Links
      > >
      >
      >
      >
      >
      > ------------------------------------
      >
      > Yahoo! Groups Links
      >
      Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62889 From: Gnaeus Iulius Caesar Date: 2009-04-10
      Subject: Re: A Question of Valid Candidacy
      Cn. Iulius Caesar L. Iuliae Aquilae SPD
       
      An observation isn't a pejorative warning. I don't think if you review my initial post to you that I warned "you". I wouldn't become as paranoid as some in the circles you work in inside Nova Roma clearly are - it isn't very intellectually healthy. 
       
      My comment was an observation based on observable facts over the last five years. Only time will tell if you personally agree with the premise that for public officials/politicians/magistrates the slippery slope starts with a belief one knows what is good for the people. If and when you seek office here, or even if you spend your time advising magistrates, then you will have an opportunity at some point to confront the parting of the way. At that very point the path splits into two and one branch leads on a level course - one of legality, while the other careens down that slope and end ultimately in abuses and violations of civic rights, all in the name of the people.
       
      I hope you do post volumes. This list could do with some pithy and witty commentary on a regular basis.
       
      Thank you, for your time.
       
      Optime vale
       

      Sent: Friday, April 10, 2009 12:06 PM
      Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: A Question of Valid Candidacy

      Aquila  Caesari S.P.D.

      Senator, it was clear you made me aware of the danger of a path you apparently were of the opinion I was treading.

      Rather than volumes I prefer to make concise and precise statements based on critical thought and logic taking into account the human condition and the all the variables associated with that which I am considering.  Thank you for the encouragement Senator Caesar. 

      Senator, from your statement I understand that you do consider the human condition as you state none of us are machines.
      Logic is dependant on many variables, so there is no such thing as pure logic as it is a process of reasoning. Nor is logic solely based upon theoretical suppositions whether subjective or objective, if is also based on observable facts and a variety of circumstances, the thought processes, deductive/inductive reasoning, all of which leads us naturally to very human conclusions and to express the resultant premise.  This is also known as human judgment and integral to each individual negotiating his/her world and contributing to it.

      Thank you for your time
       
      Optime vale,

      Julia Aquila



      --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Gnaeus Iulius Caesar" <gn_iulius_caesar@...> wrote:
      >
      > Cn.
      Iulius Caesar L. Iuliae Aquilae SPD
      >
      > If I was going to warn you
      - I would, clearly. No, it is an observation. My caution is simply that it is a very easy step to interpreting the will of the people, to determining actions to take in support of a subjective judgment, and clearly over the last few years it is becoming even easier for people for then to slip into bending and breaking laws to meet the needs of the moment, all in the name of the people.
      >
      > I encourage you to speak volumes, for you can without the hindrance or
      impediment of moderation.
      >
      > My view is of course
      subjective  None of us are machines, so pure logic is impossible in the areas of political and social development. We can become pretty logical on issues of law, but again ultimately there is a subjective element. As to what track you are on, I have no idea but I hope it leads you to where you want it to go.
      >
      > Optime vale
      >
      >
      > From: L Julia Aquila
      > Sent: Friday, April 10, 2009 10:10 AM
      > To:
      href="mailto:Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com">Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
      >
      Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: A Question of Valid Candidacy
      >
      >
      >
      L. Iulia Aquila  Cn. Iulius Caesar S.P.D.
      >
      > Senator Caesar,
      Senator Cato asked questions of the citizens of Nova Roma and I obliged as a loyal and obedient citizen to answer him.
      > I ask you this then, when you
      say I am taking a dangerous path, is this a warning designed to silence my opinion?
      > How can we know what the good, or otherwise, people of the
      Respublica want when they cannot express themselves or answer a question posed by a Senator of Nova Roma?
      > Perhaps then Senator Caesar, Senator Cato
      should have been more specific in who may answer his query and what types of answers are accepted.
      > Should it not be representative of what is on the
      minds and hearts of the people to serve the Respublica in the best way possible? The comitia after all are assemblies of the citizens. The Magistrates are therefore elected by the citizens, and the Senators are appointed based on their service to the respublica, ideally working thier way up the cursus honorum being elected by the people as they ascend that ladder.
      >
      > I make no
      claims Senator,for anyone else but myself, my perceptions are based on demonstrable, objective observations and facts. I make statements based on these observations and I ask questions based on such observation.  It is not a determination for anyone other than myself, I have the utmost faith that my fellow citizens can make up their own minds.
      >
      > Thank you,
      Senator, for affirming to me and to those readin this that your view on the interpretation of the law is subjective also.
      >
      > The fact that you
      responded to my posts is also indicative that I just may be on the right track Sir. Thank you for that Senator Caesar.
      >
      > Vale optimé,
      >
      > L. Julia Aquila
      >
      >
      > --- In
      href="mailto:Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com">Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Gnaeus Iulius Caesar" <gn_iulius_caesar@> wrote:
      > >
      > > Cn.
      Iulius Caesar L. Iuliae Aquilae SPD
      > >
      > > Determining what
      is or isn't "to the good of the citizens of the Respublica" is a dangerous path to tread. It can lead to assumptions being made about what is good for people and actions are then taken based on those assumptions. Ultimately only the people in comitia can decide what is good for them - or not - by voting on laws or candidates. We can all have opinions on what is best for Nova Roma, but the natural extension of that particular Rubicon can be seen in last year's flawed, illegal and unconstitutional "trials". We go from what we think is best for people, to acts that are in support of that, which can break or bend laws and in defense of that advance the spurious claim that illegality and unconstitutional acts are justified by the greater good. That is never the case, for the law is the law is the law.
      > >
      > > Rather than subjective claims
      about the good of the people, we are far better to concentrate on what the laws, the written laws, of Nova Roma say or don't say. These laws are the extension of the will of the people, who have determined what is good for them. We can campaign to have laws and the constitution changed, but this is an expression of their will - a concrete one. Now of course, we may differ over interpretations of the law, but a far safer foundation to stand on is the law rather than individual subjective judgments as to what is good for people.
      > >
      > > Of course, this is just my subjective view too
      > >
      > > Optime vale.
      > >
      > > From: L Julia Aquila
      > > Sent: Friday, April 10, 2009 8:39 AM
      > > To:
      href="mailto:Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com">Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
      > > Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: A Question of Valid Candidacy
      > >
      > >
      > > Aquila Catoni S.P.D.
      > >
      > > Just
      an observation I find interesting; on one hand you hold others to the strict letter of the Law or Protocol, when you, yourself were relieved of all consequences when you yourself resigned in a dramatic fashion.
      > > This
      makes me think that you and your brotherhood do exactly what you accuse others of doing in attainment of your own objectives interpreting or reinterpreting the laws to your own ends. Senator Cato I no longer have the confidence in you that I once had, your words hold too many inconsistencies and appear to be in direct opposition to the good of the citizens of the Respublica because they only appear to serve yourself and those you align yourself with.
      > > This is
      my opinion only.
      > >
      > > L. Julia Aquila
      > >
      > >
      > > --- In
      href="mailto:Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com">Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Gaius Equitius Cato" <mlcinnyc@> wrote:
      > > >
      > > > C.
      Equitius Cato omnibus in foro SPD
      > > >
      > > >
      Salvete.
      > > >
      > > > I have been thinking about
      this. 
      > > >
      > > > The Vedia de cursu honorum
      says, in part: "No individual may assume the office of one of the ordinarii who has not been a registered citizen in good standing for at least six months." (II)
      > > >
      > > > Since I resigned and have returned,
      less than six months have passed.  What does the law say about returning citizens?
      > > >
      > > > The lex Minucia Moravia de
      civitate eiuranda says, in part:
      > > >
      > > > "All
      rights and privileges of citizenship are restored in full to a returning Citizen at the time his or her citizenship is reestablished. This lex does not in itself restrict a returning Citizen in any way from lawfully pursuing any entitlements or official positions (via election or appointment) for which he or she would again become eligible." (VIII.A)
      > > >
      > > > A couple
      of days a go, I received an email from a citizen named Q. Caecilia Laeta asking if I thought that the waiver of the 90-day period was breaking the law.  I answered that it could not possibly be, since the Senate's power to do so is *in* the law: The lex Minucia Moravia de civitate eiuranda also says: "At the discretion of the Senate, the normal waiting period of ninety (90) days may be waived." (VIII.B)
      > > >
      > > > My view is, of course,
      that since I have returned with the 90-day waiting period waived by the Senate in accordance with the law, I have returned "in full" and unrestricted, and since the law specifically says that I "again become eligible" when talking about pursuing an "official position (via election...)", I believe that this allows me to run for office in spite of the six months' time mentioned in the lex Vedia.  No magistrate, from censor to consul to praetor, has made any indication publicly that they thought differently.
      > > >
      > > > So I ask you, the People: what do you think?  Should I seek
      office now, as I believe I am entitled to do, or should I wait, because there is the hint of a question?  There are two other candidates for the office I seek, so it's not like the vacancy will continue either way.
      > > >
      > > > Valete,
      > > >
      > > > Cato
      > > >
      > >
      > >
      > >
      > >
      > >
      ------------------------------------
      > >
      > > Yahoo! Groups
      Links
      > >
      >
      >
      >
      >
      >
      ------------------------------------
      >
      > Yahoo! Groups
      Links
      >




      ------------------------------------

      Yahoo! Groups Links

      <*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
          http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma/

      <*> Your email settings:
          Individual Email | Traditional

      <*> To change settings online go to:
          http://groups.yahoo..com/group/Nova-Roma/join
          (Yahoo! ID required)

      <*> To change settings via email:
          mailto:Nova-Roma-digest@yahoogroups.com
          mailto:Nova-Roma-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com

      <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
          Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

      <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
          http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
      Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62890 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2009-04-10
      Subject: Re: A Question of Valid Candidacy
      Either that or we can just expand the exposure of the back alley - as it currently generates 10x as many posts on the ML this month alone! ;)

      Vale,

      Sulla


      --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Gnaeus Iulius Caesar" <gn_iulius_caesar@...> wrote:
      >
      > Cn. Iulius Caesar L. Iuliae Aquilae SPD
      >
      > An observation isn't a pejorative warning. I don't think if you review my initial post to you that I warned "you". I wouldn't become as paranoid as some in the circles you work in inside Nova Roma clearly are - it isn't very intellectually healthy.
      >
      > My comment was an observation based on observable facts over the last five years. Only time will tell if you personally agree with the premise that for public officials/politicians/magistrates the slippery slope starts with a belief one knows what is good for the people. If and when you seek office here, or even if you spend your time advising magistrates, then you will have an opportunity at some point to confront the parting of the way. At that very point the path splits into two and one branch leads on a level course - one of legality, while the other careens down that slope and end ultimately in abuses and violations of civic rights, all in the name of the people.
      >
      > I hope you do post volumes. This list could do with some pithy and witty commentary on a regular basis.
      >
      > Thank you, for your time.
      >
      > Optime vale
      >
      >
      >
      > From: L Julia Aquila
      > Sent: Friday, April 10, 2009 12:06 PM
      > To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
      > Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: A Question of Valid Candidacy
      >
      >
      > Aquila Caesari S.P.D.
      >
      > Senator, it was clear you made me aware of the danger of a path you apparently were of the opinion I was treading.
      >
      > Rather than volumes I prefer to make concise and precise statements based on critical thought and logic taking into account the human condition and the all the variables associated with that which I am considering. Thank you for the encouragement Senator Caesar.
      >
      > Senator, from your statement I understand that you do consider the human condition as you state none of us are machines.
      > Logic is dependant on many variables, so there is no such thing as pure logic as it is a process of reasoning. Nor is logic solely based upon theoretical suppositions whether subjective or objective, if is also based on observable facts and a variety of circumstances, the thought processes, deductive/inductive reasoning, all of which leads us naturally to very human conclusions and to express the resultant premise. This is also known as human judgment and integral to each individual negotiating his/her world and contributing to it.
      >
      > Thank you for your time
      >
      > Optime vale,
      >
      > Julia Aquila
      >
      >
      >
      > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Gnaeus Iulius Caesar" <gn_iulius_caesar@> wrote:
      > >
      > > Cn. Iulius Caesar L. Iuliae Aquilae SPD
      > >
      > > If I was going to warn you - I would, clearly. No, it is an observation. My caution is simply that it is a very easy step to interpreting the will of the people, to determining actions to take in support of a subjective judgment, and clearly over the last few years it is becoming even easier for people for then to slip into bending and breaking laws to meet the needs of the moment, all in the name of the people.
      > >
      > > I encourage you to speak volumes, for you can without the hindrance or impediment of moderation.
      > >
      > > My view is of course subjective None of us are machines, so pure logic is impossible in the areas of political and social development. We can become pretty logical on issues of law, but again ultimately there is a subjective element. As to what track you are on, I have no idea but I hope it leads you to where you want it to go.
      > >
      > > Optime vale
      > >
      > >
      > > From: L Julia Aquila
      > > Sent: Friday, April 10, 2009 10:10 AM
      > > To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
      > > Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: A Question of Valid Candidacy
      > >
      > >
      > > L. Iulia Aquila Cn. Iulius Caesar S.P.D.
      > >
      > > Senator Caesar, Senator Cato asked questions of the citizens of Nova Roma and I obliged as a loyal and obedient citizen to answer him.
      > > I ask you this then, when you say I am taking a dangerous path, is this a warning designed to silence my opinion?
      > > How can we know what the good, or otherwise, people of the Respublica want when they cannot express themselves or answer a question posed by a Senator of Nova Roma?
      > > Perhaps then Senator Caesar, Senator Cato should have been more specific in who may answer his query and what types of answers are accepted.
      > > Should it not be representative of what is on the minds and hearts of the people to serve the Respublica in the best way possible? The comitia after all are assemblies of the citizens. The Magistrates are therefore elected by the citizens, and the Senators are appointed based on their service to the respublica, ideally working thier way up the cursus honorum being elected by the people as they ascend that ladder.
      > >
      > > I make no claims Senator,for anyone else but myself, my perceptions are based on demonstrable, objective observations and facts. I make statements based on these observations and I ask questions based on such observation. It is not a determination for anyone other than myself, I have the utmost faith that my fellow citizens can make up their own minds.
      > >
      > > Thank you, Senator, for affirming to me and to those readin this that your view on the interpretation of the law is subjective also.
      > >
      > > The fact that you responded to my posts is also indicative that I just may be on the right track Sir. Thank you for that Senator Caesar.
      > >
      > > Vale optimé,
      > >
      > > L. Julia Aquila
      > >
      > >
      > > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Gnaeus Iulius Caesar" <gn_iulius_caesar@> wrote:
      > > >
      > > > Cn. Iulius Caesar L. Iuliae Aquilae SPD
      > > >
      > > > Determining what is or isn't "to the good of the citizens of the Respublica" is a dangerous path to tread. It can lead to assumptions being made about what is good for people and actions are then taken based on those assumptions. Ultimately only the people in comitia can decide what is good for them - or not - by voting on laws or candidates. We can all have opinions on what is best for Nova Roma, but the natural extension of that particular Rubicon can be seen in last year's flawed, illegal and unconstitutional "trials". We go from what we think is best for people, to acts that are in support of that, which can break or bend laws and in defense of that advance the spurious claim that illegality and unconstitutional acts are justified by the greater good. That is never the case, for the law is the law is the law.
      > > >
      > > > Rather than subjective claims about the good of the people, we are far better to concentrate on what the laws, the written laws, of Nova Roma say or don't say. These laws are the extension of the will of the people, who have determined what is good for them. We can campaign to have laws and the constitution changed, but this is an expression of their will - a concrete one. Now of course, we may differ over interpretations of the law, but a far safer foundation to stand on is the law rather than individual subjective judgments as to what is good for people.
      > > >
      > > > Of course, this is just my subjective view too
      > > >
      > > > Optime vale.
      > > >
      > > > From: L Julia Aquila
      > > > Sent: Friday, April 10, 2009 8:39 AM
      > > > To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
      > > > Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: A Question of Valid Candidacy
      > > >
      > > >
      > > > Aquila Catoni S.P.D.
      > > >
      > > > Just an observation I find interesting; on one hand you hold others to the strict letter of the Law or Protocol, when you, yourself were relieved of all consequences when you yourself resigned in a dramatic fashion.
      > > > This makes me think that you and your brotherhood do exactly what you accuse others of doing in attainment of your own objectives interpreting or reinterpreting the laws to your own ends. Senator Cato I no longer have the confidence in you that I once had, your words hold too many inconsistencies and appear to be in direct opposition to the good of the citizens of the Respublica because they only appear to serve yourself and those you align yourself with.
      > > > This is my opinion only.
      > > >
      > > > L. Julia Aquila
      > > >
      > > >
      > > > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Gaius Equitius Cato" <mlcinnyc@> wrote:
      > > > >
      > > > > C. Equitius Cato omnibus in foro SPD
      > > > >
      > > > > Salvete.
      > > > >
      > > > > I have been thinking about this.
      > > > >
      > > > > The Vedia de cursu honorum says, in part: "No individual may assume the office of one of the ordinarii who has not been a registered citizen in good standing for at least six months." (II)
      > > > >
      > > > > Since I resigned and have returned, less than six months have passed. What does the law say about returning citizens?
      > > > >
      > > > > The lex Minucia Moravia de civitate eiuranda says, in part:
      > > > >
      > > > > "All rights and privileges of citizenship are restored in full to a returning Citizen at the time his or her citizenship is reestablished. This lex does not in itself restrict a returning Citizen in any way from lawfully pursuing any entitlements or official positions (via election or appointment) for which he or she would again become eligible." (VIII.A)
      > > > >
      > > > > A couple of days a go, I received an email from a citizen named Q. Caecilia Laeta asking if I thought that the waiver of the 90-day period was breaking the law. I answered that it could not possibly be, since the Senate's power to do so is *in* the law: The lex Minucia Moravia de civitate eiuranda also says: "At the discretion of the Senate, the normal waiting period of ninety (90) days may be waived." (VIII.B)
      > > > >
      > > > > My view is, of course, that since I have returned with the 90-day waiting period waived by the Senate in accordance with the law, I have returned "in full" and unrestricted, and since the law specifically says that I "again become eligible" when talking about pursuing an "official position (via election...)", I believe that this allows me to run for office in spite of the six months' time mentioned in the lex Vedia. No magistrate, from censor to consul to praetor, has made any indication publicly that they thought differently.
      > > > >
      > > > > So I ask you, the People: what do you think? Should I seek office now, as I believe I am entitled to do, or should I wait, because there is the hint of a question? There are two other candidates for the office I seek, so it's not like the vacancy will continue either way.
      > > > >
      > > > > Valete,
      > > > >
      > > > > Cato
      > > > >
      > > >
      > > >
      > > >
      > > >
      > > > ------------------------------------
      > > >
      > > > Yahoo! Groups Links
      > > >
      > >
      > >
      > >
      > >
      > > ------------------------------------
      > >
      > > Yahoo! Groups Links
      > >
      >
      >
      >
      >
      > ------------------------------------
      >
      > Yahoo! Groups Links
      >
      Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62891 From: L Julia Aquila Date: 2009-04-10
      Subject: Re: Exposing Senate Acts of Illegality!
      Salve Sulla,

      I never mentioned the Senate Seal.

      Senator Sulla, I do hope you do not mean to insinuate that the citizens of the Respublica are not intelligent enough to recognize how you use, once again, your manipulative oratory skills, i.e. the methods you employ, to once again further your own agenda through innuendo, gossip and hearsay.

      I should hope a Senator of such esteemed standing has better things to do then engage in such matters.

      Senator Sulla, I understand there is a vague aedile law, a problemic lex, Lex Cornelia Iunia de definitione intervallorum magistratuum.
      You did write this law, correct?
      You did, with levity, admit it was a bad law, correct?
      Didn't this law cause problems in the past few days as evidenced on the mailing list with a potential candidate withdrawing his candidacy, correct?

      As you say, the more the people see what is going on, the better educated decisions they can make.

      Thank you for your time Senator.

      Vale,

      Julia Aquila





      --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Robert Woolwine" <l_cornelius_sulla@...> wrote:
      >
      > Ave,
      >
      > I am glad you agree!
      >
      > I am all for removing the Senate seal. As it is noted by political scientists - let the sun shine in the Senate. The more the people see what is going on - the better educated decisions they can make. And what better way to counter innuendo, gossip and hearsay!
      >
      > Vale,
      >
      > Sulla
      >
      > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "L Julia Aquila" <dis_pensible@> wrote:
      > >
      > > Salve Senator Sulla,
      > >
      > > I agree. I think the citizens see exactly what is going on.
      > > You once again demonstrated your oratorical skill in the technique of deflection very clearly.
      > > This is no laughing matter Senator, this is no Role Playing Game, this is serious.
      > >
      > > Again I implore the good citizens of Nova Roma to take note.
      > >
      > > Vale,
      > >
      > > L. Julia Aquila
      > >
      > >
      > > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Robert Woolwine" <l_cornelius_sulla@> wrote:
      > > >
      > > > Nice try at deflection - But, it didn't fool me nor do I doubt the people of Nova Roma - but you get a A for effort! ;)
      > > >
      > > > Vale,
      > > >
      > > > Sulla
      > > >
      > > >
      > > > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "L Julia Aquila" <dis_pensible@> wrote:
      > > > >
      > > > > Salve Senator Sulla,
      > > > >
      > > > > Nice try but latching on to simple words such as "fairly new" is just another oratory skill that even the worst used car salesmen learn without even a sales 101 course.
      > > > > Thank you to illuminating for us, once again, that you often have very little to go and so you make so much of two little words.
      > > > > Thank you also for demonstrating that you did not bother to read my response to you as to how I came about my information, apparently ignoring it, to push forward your own agenda.
      > > > >
      > > > > Is this the way you treat the citizens of Nova Roma?
      > > > >
      > > > > It appears to me it may not be the citizens of Nova Roma you wish to serve, but possibly, just possibly, the members of the Back Alley as you seem to direct your conversation to that ML quite a bit.
      > > > >
      > > > > I ask the citizens of Nova Roma to take note.
      > > > >
      > > > > How enlightening indeed.
      > > > >
      > > > > Vale,
      > > > >
      > > > > L. Julia Aquila
      > > > >
      > > > > P.S. It is Aquila Sir, not Aquilia. I am of the opinion that you pride yourself on paying attention to detail, does this not apply to a regular citizen?
      > > > >
      > > > >
      > > > > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Robert Woolwine" <l_cornelius_sulla@> wrote:
      > > > > >
      > > > > > Aquilia, you cannot have it both ways - either you are a new citizen who is unfamiliar with NR - or you have been advised by certain individuals about certain other individuals.
      > > > > >
      > > > > > In the back alley we had this very discussion with Cornelius Lentulus and he named a slew of names of individuals who have taken it upon themselves to spread rumors and innuendo. Are you one of those who has been informed in such a manner - considering as you said to the Tribune - you are a fairly new member to Nova Roma?
      > > > > >
      > > > > > Vale,
      > > > > >
      > > > > > Sulla
      > > > > >
      > > > > > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "L Julia Aquila" <dis_pensible@> wrote:
      > > > > > >
      > > > > > > Salve Senator Sulla,
      > > > > > >
      > > > > > > Interesting that YOU intercept words directed at Tribune Galerius Aurelianus. This too is enlightening. Does this indicate that he speaks for you and those associated with you? One *could* conceivably make that connection. Again as a testament regarding your oratory skills, you neglected to leave out the word "fairly", as in "fairly new".
      > > > > > >
      > > > > > > As for "knowing" you, well thanks to Senator Iulius Caesar and the Ludi of last month, I learned quite a lot about you Senator Sulla. After all don't you take pride in being of a brotherhood who speaks their mind in public Senator Sulla?
      > > > > > > How could I not know about you?
      > > > > > > This is, after all, your purpose, to be known and to be heard.
      > > > > > > I also, as demonstrated here, ask many questions, and many times absence of response is just as significant as an oratory exercise.
      > > > > > >
      > > > > > > Thank you Senator Sulla for your response.
      > > > > > >
      > > > > > > Now I await Tribune Aurelianus own response.
      > > > > > >
      > > > > > > Vale
      > > > > > >
      > > > > > > Julia Aquila
      > > > >
      > > >
      > >
      >
      Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62892 From: Stephen Gallagher Date: 2009-04-10
      Subject: Re: McCarthyism OFF TOPIC
      Salve Pius
       
      And while Senator McCarthy may not have had all the names or even had some of them wrong  history has shown that there were communists in the US government
      aiding and abetting the Soviet Union and the world wide Communist conspiracy.
       
      Some of the Soviet Spies are well know and other still remain unmasked.
      Alger Hiss was a Soviet spy and the left can never acknowledge that fact.
       
      Try reading the history of the Verona intercepts.
      Try reading Whitaker Chambers book Witness
       
       
      Vale
       
      Paulinus
       
       
       

       

      To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
      From: from@...
      Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2009 17:02:33 +0200
      Subject: [Nova-Roma] McCarthyism (Was: Exposing Senate Acts of Illegality!)



      Robert Woolwine wrote:
      > In the back alley we had this very discussion with Cornelius Lentulus and he named a slew of names of individuals who have taken it upon themselves to spread rumors and innuendo. Are you one of those who has been informed in such a manner - considering as you said to the Tribune - you are a fairly new member to Nova Roma?
      >

      " I have here in my hand a list of names that were made known to the
      Secretary of State as being members of the Communist Party and who
      nevertheless are still working and shaping policy in the State Department."

      "Are you now, or have you ever been, a member of the Communist Party?"

      /Pius

      Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62893 From: M.CVR.COMPLVTENSIS Date: 2009-04-10
      Subject: SECOND CALL OF CANDIDATES
      I hereby call for candidates to stand for election to the ordinary
      magistracies of the Comitia Centuriata and the Comitia Populi Tributa.

      Anyone wishing to serve in any of these positions must have been a
      citizen for at least six months by Kal. Apr. MMDCCLXII (May 1st, 2009)
      and be an assiduus (tax-paying) citizen. I will convene the comitia for
      the elections at the end of April, but candidates are welcome to
      announce themselves and begin campaigning if they wish.

      All potential candidates must contact me with their intention to stand
      for office directly by sending a message to M.Curiatius.Complutensis at
      NovaRoma dot org in order to be placed on the ballot. Please include the
      word "candidate" in the subject of the message, and be sure to tell me
      your full Nova Roman name and the office for which you will campaign.
      Simply announcing your candidacy to one of the lists shall not be
      accepted. You must write to me directly.

      Candidacies will be accepted until 21 April 2009 (18.00 hrs CET Rome;
      12.00 hrs EST Philadelphia). The contio is tentatively scheduled to
      begin on 26 April, with the elections to follow tentatively beginning on
      3 May.

      On behalf of the Res Publica Libera Senatus Populique Novae Romae I,
      Marcus Curiatius Complutensis, Senior Consul, hereby issue this call for
      candidates for the following offices:

      I CURULE AEDILE: Must be at least 21 years old as of Kal. Mai. 2762 (May
      1st, 2009). Must be assiduus.

      I QUAESTOR: Must be at least 21 years old as of Kal. Mai. 2762 (May 1st,
      2009). Must be assiduus.

      II DIRIBITORES: Must be at least 21 years old as of Kal. Mai. 2762 (May
      1st, 2009). Must be assiduus.

      I CUSTOS: Must be at least 21 years old as of Kal. Mai. 2762 (May 1st,
      2009). Must be assiduus.



      Datum sub manu mea ante diem IV Id. Aprilis M. Curiatio M. Iulio
      consulibus, in anno AUC MMDCCLXII.

      M. Curiatius Complutensis
      M. Iulius Severus

      Consules
      Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62894 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2009-04-10
      Subject: Re: Exposing Senate Acts of Illegality!
      Ave,

      You hope you do not mean to insinuate - but that is precisely what you just did! Nice job! ;)

      Again, you are not correct, in the back alley (BackAlley-subscribe@yahoogroups.com) - I said it is a vague law - not a bad law - if anything it needs to be expanded to prevent magistrates who hold a current position from running for any other position for at least a year. More of the Mos Maiorum is needed in NR.

      If the consuls wish to propose a law that would bring more of the Mos Maiorum to NR - I would support it.

      Vale,

      Sulla




      --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "L Julia Aquila" <dis_pensible@...> wrote:
      >
      > Salve Sulla,
      >
      > I never mentioned the Senate Seal.
      >
      > Senator Sulla, I do hope you do not mean to insinuate that the citizens of the Respublica are not intelligent enough to recognize how you use, once again, your manipulative oratory skills, i.e. the methods you employ, to once again further your own agenda through innuendo, gossip and hearsay.
      >
      > I should hope a Senator of such esteemed standing has better things to do then engage in such matters.
      >
      > Senator Sulla, I understand there is a vague aedile law, a problemic lex, Lex Cornelia Iunia de definitione intervallorum magistratuum.
      > You did write this law, correct?
      > You did, with levity, admit it was a bad law, correct?
      > Didn't this law cause problems in the past few days as evidenced on the mailing list with a potential candidate withdrawing his candidacy, correct?
      >
      > As you say, the more the people see what is going on, the better educated decisions they can make.
      >
      > Thank you for your time Senator.
      >
      > Vale,
      >
      > Julia Aquila
      >
      >
      >
      >
      >
      > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Robert Woolwine" <l_cornelius_sulla@> wrote:
      > >
      > > Ave,
      > >
      > > I am glad you agree!
      > >
      > > I am all for removing the Senate seal. As it is noted by political scientists - let the sun shine in the Senate. The more the people see what is going on - the better educated decisions they can make. And what better way to counter innuendo, gossip and hearsay!
      > >
      > > Vale,
      > >
      > > Sulla
      > >
      > > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "L Julia Aquila" <dis_pensible@> wrote:
      > > >
      > > > Salve Senator Sulla,
      > > >
      > > > I agree. I think the citizens see exactly what is going on.
      > > > You once again demonstrated your oratorical skill in the technique of deflection very clearly.
      > > > This is no laughing matter Senator, this is no Role Playing Game, this is serious.
      > > >
      > > > Again I implore the good citizens of Nova Roma to take note.
      > > >
      > > > Vale,
      > > >
      > > > L. Julia Aquila
      > > >
      > > >
      > > > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Robert Woolwine" <l_cornelius_sulla@> wrote:
      > > > >
      > > > > Nice try at deflection - But, it didn't fool me nor do I doubt the people of Nova Roma - but you get a A for effort! ;)
      > > > >
      > > > > Vale,
      > > > >
      > > > > Sulla
      > > > >
      > > > >
      > > > > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "L Julia Aquila" <dis_pensible@> wrote:
      > > > > >
      > > > > > Salve Senator Sulla,
      > > > > >
      > > > > > Nice try but latching on to simple words such as "fairly new" is just another oratory skill that even the worst used car salesmen learn without even a sales 101 course.
      > > > > > Thank you to illuminating for us, once again, that you often have very little to go and so you make so much of two little words.
      > > > > > Thank you also for demonstrating that you did not bother to read my response to you as to how I came about my information, apparently ignoring it, to push forward your own agenda.
      > > > > >
      > > > > > Is this the way you treat the citizens of Nova Roma?
      > > > > >
      > > > > > It appears to me it may not be the citizens of Nova Roma you wish to serve, but possibly, just possibly, the members of the Back Alley as you seem to direct your conversation to that ML quite a bit.
      > > > > >
      > > > > > I ask the citizens of Nova Roma to take note.
      > > > > >
      > > > > > How enlightening indeed.
      > > > > >
      > > > > > Vale,
      > > > > >
      > > > > > L. Julia Aquila
      > > > > >
      > > > > > P.S. It is Aquila Sir, not Aquilia. I am of the opinion that you pride yourself on paying attention to detail, does this not apply to a regular citizen?
      > > > > >
      > > > > >
      > > > > > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Robert Woolwine" <l_cornelius_sulla@> wrote:
      > > > > > >
      > > > > > > Aquilia, you cannot have it both ways - either you are a new citizen who is unfamiliar with NR - or you have been advised by certain individuals about certain other individuals.
      > > > > > >
      > > > > > > In the back alley we had this very discussion with Cornelius Lentulus and he named a slew of names of individuals who have taken it upon themselves to spread rumors and innuendo. Are you one of those who has been informed in such a manner - considering as you said to the Tribune - you are a fairly new member to Nova Roma?
      > > > > > >
      > > > > > > Vale,
      > > > > > >
      > > > > > > Sulla
      > > > > > >
      > > > > > > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "L Julia Aquila" <dis_pensible@> wrote:
      > > > > > > >
      > > > > > > > Salve Senator Sulla,
      > > > > > > >
      > > > > > > > Interesting that YOU intercept words directed at Tribune Galerius Aurelianus. This too is enlightening. Does this indicate that he speaks for you and those associated with you? One *could* conceivably make that connection. Again as a testament regarding your oratory skills, you neglected to leave out the word "fairly", as in "fairly new".
      > > > > > > >
      > > > > > > > As for "knowing" you, well thanks to Senator Iulius Caesar and the Ludi of last month, I learned quite a lot about you Senator Sulla. After all don't you take pride in being of a brotherhood who speaks their mind in public Senator Sulla?
      > > > > > > > How could I not know about you?
      > > > > > > > This is, after all, your purpose, to be known and to be heard.
      > > > > > > > I also, as demonstrated here, ask many questions, and many times absence of response is just as significant as an oratory exercise.
      > > > > > > >
      > > > > > > > Thank you Senator Sulla for your response.
      > > > > > > >
      > > > > > > > Now I await Tribune Aurelianus own response.
      > > > > > > >
      > > > > > > > Vale
      > > > > > > >
      > > > > > > > Julia Aquila
      > > > > >
      > > > >
      > > >
      > >
      >
      Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62895 From: L Julia Aquila Date: 2009-04-10
      Subject: Re: A Question of Valid Candidacy
      L. Iulia Aquila Cn. Iulio Caesari S.P.D.

      Thank you Senator Caesar.

      One must also consider the subjective interpretation of an observation, as you so indicated, and so it may very well be perceived as pejorative.

      Sir, the concern I have regarding your assertion of possible paranoia is that often that same element is present in the person, and possibly the associations, of the actor initially mentioning it. Insinuating someone's intellectual health may be at risk could be perceived as an insult towards a citizen.

      My intent was not to elicit an untoward tone.

      Thank you Senator for your time

      Cúrá ut valéas atque di vos incolumes custodiant

      L. Julia Aquila




      --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Gnaeus Iulius Caesar" <gn_iulius_caesar@...> wrote:
      >
      > Cn. Iulius Caesar L. Iuliae Aquilae SPD
      >
      > An observation isn't a pejorative warning. I don't think if you review my initial post to you that I warned "you". I wouldn't become as paranoid as some in the circles you work in inside Nova Roma clearly are - it isn't very intellectually healthy.
      >
      > My comment was an observation based on observable facts over the last five years. Only time will tell if you personally agree with the premise that for public officials/politicians/magistrates the slippery slope starts with a belief one knows what is good for the people. If and when you seek office here, or even if you spend your time advising magistrates, then you will have an opportunity at some point to confront the parting of the way. At that very point the path splits into two and one branch leads on a level course - one of legality, while the other careens down that slope and end ultimately in abuses and violations of civic rights, all in the name of the people.
      >
      > I hope you do post volumes. This list could do with some pithy and witty commentary on a regular basis.
      >
      > Thank you, for your time.
      >
      > Optime vale
      >
      >
      >
      > From: L Julia Aquila
      > Sent: Friday, April 10, 2009 12:06 PM
      > To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
      > Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: A Question of Valid Candidacy
      >
      >
      > Aquila Caesari S.P.D.
      >
      > Senator, it was clear you made me aware of the danger of a path you apparently were of the opinion I was treading.
      >
      > Rather than volumes I prefer to make concise and precise statements based on critical thought and logic taking into account the human condition and the all the variables associated with that which I am considering. Thank you for the encouragement Senator Caesar.
      >
      > Senator, from your statement I understand that you do consider the human condition as you state none of us are machines.
      > Logic is dependant on many variables, so there is no such thing as pure logic as it is a process of reasoning. Nor is logic solely based upon theoretical suppositions whether subjective or objective, if is also based on observable facts and a variety of circumstances, the thought processes, deductive/inductive reasoning, all of which leads us naturally to very human conclusions and to express the resultant premise. This is also known as human judgment and integral to each individual negotiating his/her world and contributing to it.
      >
      > Thank you for your time
      >
      > Optime vale,
      >
      > Julia Aquila
      >
      >
      >
      > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Gnaeus Iulius Caesar" <gn_iulius_caesar@> wrote:
      > >
      > > Cn. Iulius Caesar L. Iuliae Aquilae SPD
      > >
      > > If I was going to warn you - I would, clearly. No, it is an observation. My caution is simply that it is a very easy step to interpreting the will of the people, to determining actions to take in support of a subjective judgment, and clearly over the last few years it is becoming even easier for people for then to slip into bending and breaking laws to meet the needs of the moment, all in the name of the people.
      > >
      > > I encourage you to speak volumes, for you can without the hindrance or impediment of moderation.
      > >
      > > My view is of course subjective None of us are machines, so pure logic is impossible in the areas of political and social development. We can become pretty logical on issues of law, but again ultimately there is a subjective element. As to what track you are on, I have no idea but I hope it leads you to where you want it to go.
      > >
      > > Optime vale
      > >
      > >
      > > From: L Julia Aquila
      > > Sent: Friday, April 10, 2009 10:10 AM
      > > To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
      > > Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: A Question of Valid Candidacy
      > >
      > >
      > > L. Iulia Aquila Cn. Iulius Caesar S.P.D.
      > >
      > > Senator Caesar, Senator Cato asked questions of the citizens of Nova Roma and I obliged as a loyal and obedient citizen to answer him.
      > > I ask you this then, when you say I am taking a dangerous path, is this a warning designed to silence my opinion?
      > > How can we know what the good, or otherwise, people of the Respublica want when they cannot express themselves or answer a question posed by a Senator of Nova Roma?
      > > Perhaps then Senator Caesar, Senator Cato should have been more specific in who may answer his query and what types of answers are accepted.
      > > Should it not be representative of what is on the minds and hearts of the people to serve the Respublica in the best way possible? The comitia after all are assemblies of the citizens. The Magistrates are therefore elected by the citizens, and the Senators are appointed based on their service to the respublica, ideally working thier way up the cursus honorum being elected by the people as they ascend that ladder.
      > >
      > > I make no claims Senator,for anyone else but myself, my perceptions are based on demonstrable, objective observations and facts. I make statements based on these observations and I ask questions based on such observation. It is not a determination for anyone other than myself, I have the utmost faith that my fellow citizens can make up their own minds.
      > >
      > > Thank you, Senator, for affirming to me and to those readin this that your view on the interpretation of the law is subjective also.
      > >
      > > The fact that you responded to my posts is also indicative that I just may be on the right track Sir. Thank you for that Senator Caesar.
      > >
      > > Vale optimé,
      > >
      > > L. Julia Aquila
      > >
      > >
      > > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Gnaeus Iulius Caesar" <gn_iulius_caesar@> wrote:
      > > >
      > > > Cn. Iulius Caesar L. Iuliae Aquilae SPD
      > > >
      > > > Determining what is or isn't "to the good of the citizens of the Respublica" is a dangerous path to tread. It can lead to assumptions being made about what is good for people and actions are then taken based on those assumptions. Ultimately only the people in comitia can decide what is good for them - or not - by voting on laws or candidates. We can all have opinions on what is best for Nova Roma, but the natural extension of that particular Rubicon can be seen in last year's flawed, illegal and unconstitutional "trials". We go from what we think is best for people, to acts that are in support of that, which can break or bend laws and in defense of that advance the spurious claim that illegality and unconstitutional acts are justified by the greater good. That is never the case, for the law is the law is the law.
      > > >
      > > > Rather than subjective claims about the good of the people, we are far better to concentrate on what the laws, the written laws, of Nova Roma say or don't say. These laws are the extension of the will of the people, who have determined what is good for them. We can campaign to have laws and the constitution changed, but this is an expression of their will - a concrete one. Now of course, we may differ over interpretations of the law, but a far safer foundation to stand on is the law rather than individual subjective judgments as to what is good for people.
      > > >
      > > > Of course, this is just my subjective view too
      > > >
      > > > Optime vale.
      > > >
      > > > From: L Julia Aquila
      > > > Sent: Friday, April 10, 2009 8:39 AM
      > > > To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
      > > > Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: A Question of Valid Candidacy
      > > >
      > > >
      > > > Aquila Catoni S.P.D.
      > > >
      > > > Just an observation I find interesting; on one hand you hold others to the strict letter of the Law or Protocol, when you, yourself were relieved of all consequences when you yourself resigned in a dramatic fashion.
      > > > This makes me think that you and your brotherhood do exactly what you accuse others of doing in attainment of your own objectives interpreting or reinterpreting the laws to your own ends. Senator Cato I no longer have the confidence in you that I once had, your words hold too many inconsistencies and appear to be in direct opposition to the good of the citizens of the Respublica because they only appear to serve yourself and those you align yourself with.
      > > > This is my opinion only.
      > > >
      > > > L. Julia Aquila
      > > >
      > > >
      > > > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Gaius Equitius Cato" <mlcinnyc@> wrote:
      > > > >
      > > > > C. Equitius Cato omnibus in foro SPD
      > > > >
      > > > > Salvete.
      > > > >
      > > > > I have been thinking about this.
      > > > >
      > > > > The Vedia de cursu honorum says, in part: "No individual may assume the office of one of the ordinarii who has not been a registered citizen in good standing for at least six months." (II)
      > > > >
      > > > > Since I resigned and have returned, less than six months have passed. What does the law say about returning citizens?
      > > > >
      > > > > The lex Minucia Moravia de civitate eiuranda says, in part:
      > > > >
      > > > > "All rights and privileges of citizenship are restored in full to a returning Citizen at the time his or her citizenship is reestablished. This lex does not in itself restrict a returning Citizen in any way from lawfully pursuing any entitlements or official positions (via election or appointment) for which he or she would again become eligible." (VIII.A)
      > > > >
      > > > > A couple of days a go, I received an email from a citizen named Q. Caecilia Laeta asking if I thought that the waiver of the 90-day period was breaking the law. I answered that it could not possibly be, since the Senate's power to do so is *in* the law: The lex Minucia Moravia de civitate eiuranda also says: "At the discretion of the Senate, the normal waiting period of ninety (90) days may be waived." (VIII.B)
      > > > >
      > > > > My view is, of course, that since I have returned with the 90-day waiting period waived by the Senate in accordance with the law, I have returned "in full" and unrestricted, and since the law specifically says that I "again become eligible" when talking about pursuing an "official position (via election...)", I believe that this allows me to run for office in spite of the six months' time mentioned in the lex Vedia. No magistrate, from censor to consul to praetor, has made any indication publicly that they thought differently.
      > > > >
      > > > > So I ask you, the People: what do you think? Should I seek office now, as I believe I am entitled to do, or should I wait, because there is the hint of a question? There are two other candidates for the office I seek, so it's not like the vacancy will continue either way.
      > > > >
      > > > > Valete,
      > > > >
      > > > > Cato
      > > > >
      > > >
      > > >
      > > >
      > > >
      > > > ------------------------------------
      > > >
      > > > Yahoo! Groups Links
      > > >
      > >
      > >
      > >
      > >
      > > ------------------------------------
      > >
      > > Yahoo! Groups Links
      > >
      >
      >
      >
      >
      > ------------------------------------
      >
      > Yahoo! Groups Links
      >
      Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62896 From: L Julia Aquila Date: 2009-04-10
      Subject: Re: Exposing Senate Acts of Illegality!
      Salve Senator Sulla,

      I did not insinuate. I state my questions and statement clearly.

      In my opinion your tactics are transparent, your accusations are reflections of your intent and you have no one but yourself to blame.

      Thank you for answering my questions Sir.

      Vale,

      L. Julia Aquila



      --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Robert Woolwine" <l_cornelius_sulla@...> wrote:
      >
      > Ave,
      >
      > You hope you do not mean to insinuate - but that is precisely what you just did! Nice job! ;)
      >
      > Again, you are not correct, in the back alley (BackAlley-subscribe@yahoogroups.com) - I said it is a vague law - not a bad law - if anything it needs to be expanded to prevent magistrates who hold a current position from running for any other position for at least a year. More of the Mos Maiorum is needed in NR.
      >
      > If the consuls wish to propose a law that would bring more of the Mos Maiorum to NR - I would support it.
      >
      > Vale,
      >
      > Sulla
      >
      >
      >
      >
      > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "L Julia Aquila" <dis_pensible@> wrote:
      > >
      > > Salve Sulla,
      > >
      > > I never mentioned the Senate Seal.
      > >
      > > Senator Sulla, I do hope you do not mean to insinuate that the citizens of the Respublica are not intelligent enough to recognize how you use, once again, your manipulative oratory skills, i.e. the methods you employ, to once again further your own agenda through innuendo, gossip and hearsay.
      > >
      > > I should hope a Senator of such esteemed standing has better things to do then engage in such matters.
      > >
      > > Senator Sulla, I understand there is a vague aedile law, a problemic lex, Lex Cornelia Iunia de definitione intervallorum magistratuum.
      > > You did write this law, correct?
      > > You did, with levity, admit it was a bad law, correct?
      > > Didn't this law cause problems in the past few days as evidenced on the mailing list with a potential candidate withdrawing his candidacy, correct?
      > >
      > > As you say, the more the people see what is going on, the better educated decisions they can make.
      > >
      > > Thank you for your time Senator.
      > >
      > > Vale,
      > >
      > > Julia Aquila
      > >
      > >
      > >
      > >
      > >
      > > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Robert Woolwine" <l_cornelius_sulla@> wrote:
      > > >
      > > > Ave,
      > > >
      > > > I am glad you agree!
      > > >
      > > > I am all for removing the Senate seal. As it is noted by political scientists - let the sun shine in the Senate. The more the people see what is going on - the better educated decisions they can make. And what better way to counter innuendo, gossip and hearsay!
      > > >
      > > > Vale,
      > > >
      > > > Sulla
      > > >
      > > > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "L Julia Aquila" <dis_pensible@> wrote:
      > > > >
      > > > > Salve Senator Sulla,
      > > > >
      > > > > I agree. I think the citizens see exactly what is going on.
      > > > > You once again demonstrated your oratorical skill in the technique of deflection very clearly.
      > > > > This is no laughing matter Senator, this is no Role Playing Game, this is serious.
      > > > >
      > > > > Again I implore the good citizens of Nova Roma to take note.
      > > > >
      > > > > Vale,
      > > > >
      > > > > L. Julia Aquila
      > > > >
      > > > >
      > > > > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Robert Woolwine" <l_cornelius_sulla@> wrote:
      > > > > >
      > > > > > Nice try at deflection - But, it didn't fool me nor do I doubt the people of Nova Roma - but you get a A for effort! ;)
      > > > > >
      > > > > > Vale,
      > > > > >
      > > > > > Sulla
      > > > > >
      > > > > >
      > > > > > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "L Julia Aquila" <dis_pensible@> wrote:
      > > > > > >
      > > > > > > Salve Senator Sulla,
      > > > > > >
      > > > > > > Nice try but latching on to simple words such as "fairly new" is just another oratory skill that even the worst used car salesmen learn without even a sales 101 course.
      > > > > > > Thank you to illuminating for us, once again, that you often have very little to go and so you make so much of two little words.
      > > > > > > Thank you also for demonstrating that you did not bother to read my response to you as to how I came about my information, apparently ignoring it, to push forward your own agenda.
      > > > > > >
      > > > > > > Is this the way you treat the citizens of Nova Roma?
      > > > > > >
      > > > > > > It appears to me it may not be the citizens of Nova Roma you wish to serve, but possibly, just possibly, the members of the Back Alley as you seem to direct your conversation to that ML quite a bit.
      > > > > > >
      > > > > > > I ask the citizens of Nova Roma to take note.
      > > > > > >
      > > > > > > How enlightening indeed.
      > > > > > >
      > > > > > > Vale,
      > > > > > >
      > > > > > > L. Julia Aquila
      > > > > > >
      > > > > > > P.S. It is Aquila Sir, not Aquilia. I am of the opinion that you pride yourself on paying attention to detail, does this not apply to a regular citizen?
      > > > > > >
      > > > > > >
      > > > > > > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Robert Woolwine" <l_cornelius_sulla@> wrote:
      > > > > > > >
      > > > > > > > Aquilia, you cannot have it both ways - either you are a new citizen who is unfamiliar with NR - or you have been advised by certain individuals about certain other individuals.
      > > > > > > >
      > > > > > > > In the back alley we had this very discussion with Cornelius Lentulus and he named a slew of names of individuals who have taken it upon themselves to spread rumors and innuendo. Are you one of those who has been informed in such a manner - considering as you said to the Tribune - you are a fairly new member to Nova Roma?
      > > > > > > >
      > > > > > > > Vale,
      > > > > > > >
      > > > > > > > Sulla
      > > > > > > >
      > > > > > > > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "L Julia Aquila" <dis_pensible@> wrote:
      > > > > > > > >
      > > > > > > > > Salve Senator Sulla,
      > > > > > > > >
      > > > > > > > > Interesting that YOU intercept words directed at Tribune Galerius Aurelianus. This too is enlightening. Does this indicate that he speaks for you and those associated with you? One *could* conceivably make that connection. Again as a testament regarding your oratory skills, you neglected to leave out the word "fairly", as in "fairly new".
      > > > > > > > >
      > > > > > > > > As for "knowing" you, well thanks to Senator Iulius Caesar and the Ludi of last month, I learned quite a lot about you Senator Sulla. After all don't you take pride in being of a brotherhood who speaks their mind in public Senator Sulla?
      > > > > > > > > How could I not know about you?
      > > > > > > > > This is, after all, your purpose, to be known and to be heard.
      > > > > > > > > I also, as demonstrated here, ask many questions, and many times absence of response is just as significant as an oratory exercise.
      > > > > > > > >
      > > > > > > > > Thank you Senator Sulla for your response.
      > > > > > > > >
      > > > > > > > > Now I await Tribune Aurelianus own response.
      > > > > > > > >
      > > > > > > > > Vale
      > > > > > > > >
      > > > > > > > > Julia Aquila
      > > > > > >
      > > > > >
      > > > >
      > > >
      > >
      >
      Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62897 From: Kristoffer From Date: 2009-04-10
      Subject: Re: McCarthyism OFF TOPIC
      Stephen Gallagher wrote:
      > And while Senator McCarthy may not have had all the names or even had some of them wrong history has shown that there were communists in the US government aiding and abetting the Soviet Union and the world wide Communist conspiracy.
      >

      Salve, Tiberi Galeri Pauline.

      I must point out that I'm frightened by how the two responses to my
      observation embraced and defended McCarthyism, respectively. The ends
      does not justify the means, as McCarthy's contemporaries pointed out and
      just about every sane person must agree with.

      One person's necessary evil is another's pogrom.

      Vale, Pius.
      Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62898 From: Stephen Gallagher Date: 2009-04-10
      Subject: Re: McCarthyism OFF TOPIC
      Salve, Pius
       
      McCarthyism is a pejorative invented by those who were aiding and abetting a criminal conspiracy to destroy the government of the USA by any means necessary
       
      I do not approve how Joe McCarthy managed most of his affairs and I will admit that some innocent people were damaged at that time.
       
      But those on the left never apologize for the atrocities committed in their names. Just his past week liberal/socialist members of the US Congress meet with the leader of the Gulag called Cuba.
       
      All they had was praise for this two bit dictator.
       
      Vale
       
      Paulinus
       
       
       

      To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
      From: from@...
      Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2009 21:33:25 +0200
      Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: McCarthyism OFF TOPIC



      Stephen Gallagher wrote:
      > And while Senator McCarthy may not have had all the names or even had some of them wrong history has shown that there were communists in the US government aiding and abetting the Soviet Union and the world wide Communist conspiracy.
      >

      Salve, Tiberi Galeri Pauline.

      I must point out that I'm frightened by how the two responses to my
      observation embraced and defended McCarthyism, respectively. The ends
      does not justify the means, as McCarthy's contemporaries pointed out and
      just about every sane person must agree with.

      One person's necessary evil is another's pogrom.

      Vale, Pius.


      Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62899 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2009-04-10
      Subject: Re: A Question of Valid Candidacy
      Cato Iuliae Aquilae sal.

      Salve.

      Iulia Aquila, I am still interested in knowing if you still think my approach is inconsistent with a desire for adherence to the law.

      Vale,

      Cato
      Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62900 From: walkyr@aol.com Date: 2009-04-10
      Subject: OT: Maior
      Sorry everyone.

      Maior, may I write to you privately about the JSTOR project?

      Gratias,

      V Rutilia
      Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62901 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2009-04-10
      Subject: Re: A Question of Valid Candidacy
      Your response to Caesar is that if one mentions paranoia one must be paranoid?

      Does that work with being a Genius? If I say your a genius does that mean I am one as well? KEWL! I like that logic!

      Vale,

      Sulla



      --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "L Julia Aquila" <dis_pensible@...> wrote:
      >
      > L. Iulia Aquila Cn. Iulio Caesari S.P.D.
      >
      > Thank you Senator Caesar.
      >
      > One must also consider the subjective interpretation of an observation, as you so indicated, and so it may very well be perceived as pejorative.
      >
      > Sir, the concern I have regarding your assertion of possible paranoia is that often that same element is present in the person, and possibly the associations, of the actor initially mentioning it. Insinuating someone's intellectual health may be at risk could be perceived as an insult towards a citizen.
      >
      > My intent was not to elicit an untoward tone.
      >
      > Thank you Senator for your time
      >
      > Cúrá ut valéas atque di vos incolumes custodiant
      >
      > L. Julia Aquila
      >
      >
      >
      >
      > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Gnaeus Iulius Caesar" <gn_iulius_caesar@> wrote:
      > >
      > > Cn. Iulius Caesar L. Iuliae Aquilae SPD
      > >
      > > An observation isn't a pejorative warning. I don't think if you review my initial post to you that I warned "you". I wouldn't become as paranoid as some in the circles you work in inside Nova Roma clearly are - it isn't very intellectually healthy.
      > >
      > > My comment was an observation based on observable facts over the last five years. Only time will tell if you personally agree with the premise that for public officials/politicians/magistrates the slippery slope starts with a belief one knows what is good for the people. If and when you seek office here, or even if you spend your time advising magistrates, then you will have an opportunity at some point to confront the parting of the way. At that very point the path splits into two and one branch leads on a level course - one of legality, while the other careens down that slope and end ultimately in abuses and violations of civic rights, all in the name of the people.
      > >
      > > I hope you do post volumes. This list could do with some pithy and witty commentary on a regular basis.
      > >
      > > Thank you, for your time.
      > >
      > > Optime vale
      > >
      > >
      > >
      > > From: L Julia Aquila
      > > Sent: Friday, April 10, 2009 12:06 PM
      > > To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
      > > Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: A Question of Valid Candidacy
      > >
      > >
      > > Aquila Caesari S.P.D.
      > >
      > > Senator, it was clear you made me aware of the danger of a path you apparently were of the opinion I was treading.
      > >
      > > Rather than volumes I prefer to make concise and precise statements based on critical thought and logic taking into account the human condition and the all the variables associated with that which I am considering. Thank you for the encouragement Senator Caesar.
      > >
      > > Senator, from your statement I understand that you do consider the human condition as you state none of us are machines.
      > > Logic is dependant on many variables, so there is no such thing as pure logic as it is a process of reasoning. Nor is logic solely based upon theoretical suppositions whether subjective or objective, if is also based on observable facts and a variety of circumstances, the thought processes, deductive/inductive reasoning, all of which leads us naturally to very human conclusions and to express the resultant premise. This is also known as human judgment and integral to each individual negotiating his/her world and contributing to it.
      > >
      > > Thank you for your time
      > >
      > > Optime vale,
      > >
      > > Julia Aquila
      > >
      > >
      > >
      > > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Gnaeus Iulius Caesar" <gn_iulius_caesar@> wrote:
      > > >
      > > > Cn. Iulius Caesar L. Iuliae Aquilae SPD
      > > >
      > > > If I was going to warn you - I would, clearly. No, it is an observation. My caution is simply that it is a very easy step to interpreting the will of the people, to determining actions to take in support of a subjective judgment, and clearly over the last few years it is becoming even easier for people for then to slip into bending and breaking laws to meet the needs of the moment, all in the name of the people.
      > > >
      > > > I encourage you to speak volumes, for you can without the hindrance or impediment of moderation.
      > > >
      > > > My view is of course subjective None of us are machines, so pure logic is impossible in the areas of political and social development. We can become pretty logical on issues of law, but again ultimately there is a subjective element. As to what track you are on, I have no idea but I hope it leads you to where you want it to go.
      > > >
      > > > Optime vale
      > > >
      > > >
      > > > From: L Julia Aquila
      > > > Sent: Friday, April 10, 2009 10:10 AM
      > > > To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
      > > > Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: A Question of Valid Candidacy
      > > >
      > > >
      > > > L. Iulia Aquila Cn. Iulius Caesar S.P.D.
      > > >
      > > > Senator Caesar, Senator Cato asked questions of the citizens of Nova Roma and I obliged as a loyal and obedient citizen to answer him.
      > > > I ask you this then, when you say I am taking a dangerous path, is this a warning designed to silence my opinion?
      > > > How can we know what the good, or otherwise, people of the Respublica want when they cannot express themselves or answer a question posed by a Senator of Nova Roma?
      > > > Perhaps then Senator Caesar, Senator Cato should have been more specific in who may answer his query and what types of answers are accepted.
      > > > Should it not be representative of what is on the minds and hearts of the people to serve the Respublica in the best way possible? The comitia after all are assemblies of the citizens. The Magistrates are therefore elected by the citizens, and the Senators are appointed based on their service to the respublica, ideally working thier way up the cursus honorum being elected by the people as they ascend that ladder.
      > > >
      > > > I make no claims Senator,for anyone else but myself, my perceptions are based on demonstrable, objective observations and facts. I make statements based on these observations and I ask questions based on such observation. It is not a determination for anyone other than myself, I have the utmost faith that my fellow citizens can make up their own minds.
      > > >
      > > > Thank you, Senator, for affirming to me and to those readin this that your view on the interpretation of the law is subjective also.
      > > >
      > > > The fact that you responded to my posts is also indicative that I just may be on the right track Sir. Thank you for that Senator Caesar.
      > > >
      > > > Vale optimé,
      > > >
      > > > L. Julia Aquila
      > > >
      > > >
      > > > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Gnaeus Iulius Caesar" <gn_iulius_caesar@> wrote:
      > > > >
      > > > > Cn. Iulius Caesar L. Iuliae Aquilae SPD
      > > > >
      > > > > Determining what is or isn't "to the good of the citizens of the Respublica" is a dangerous path to tread. It can lead to assumptions being made about what is good for people and actions are then taken based on those assumptions. Ultimately only the people in comitia can decide what is good for them - or not - by voting on laws or candidates. We can all have opinions on what is best for Nova Roma, but the natural extension of that particular Rubicon can be seen in last year's flawed, illegal and unconstitutional "trials". We go from what we think is best for people, to acts that are in support of that, which can break or bend laws and in defense of that advance the spurious claim that illegality and unconstitutional acts are justified by the greater good. That is never the case, for the law is the law is the law.
      > > > >
      > > > > Rather than subjective claims about the good of the people, we are far better to concentrate on what the laws, the written laws, of Nova Roma say or don't say. These laws are the extension of the will of the people, who have determined what is good for them. We can campaign to have laws and the constitution changed, but this is an expression of their will - a concrete one. Now of course, we may differ over interpretations of the law, but a far safer foundation to stand on is the law rather than individual subjective judgments as to what is good for people.
      > > > >
      > > > > Of course, this is just my subjective view too
      > > > >
      > > > > Optime vale.
      > > > >
      > > > > From: L Julia Aquila
      > > > > Sent: Friday, April 10, 2009 8:39 AM
      > > > > To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
      > > > > Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: A Question of Valid Candidacy
      > > > >
      > > > >
      > > > > Aquila Catoni S.P.D.
      > > > >
      > > > > Just an observation I find interesting; on one hand you hold others to the strict letter of the Law or Protocol, when you, yourself were relieved of all consequences when you yourself resigned in a dramatic fashion.
      > > > > This makes me think that you and your brotherhood do exactly what you accuse others of doing in attainment of your own objectives interpreting or reinterpreting the laws to your own ends. Senator Cato I no longer have the confidence in you that I once had, your words hold too many inconsistencies and appear to be in direct opposition to the good of the citizens of the Respublica because they only appear to serve yourself and those you align yourself with.
      > > > > This is my opinion only.
      > > > >
      > > > > L. Julia Aquila
      > > > >
      > > > >
      > > > > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Gaius Equitius Cato" <mlcinnyc@> wrote:
      > > > > >
      > > > > > C. Equitius Cato omnibus in foro SPD
      > > > > >
      > > > > > Salvete.
      > > > > >
      > > > > > I have been thinking about this.
      > > > > >
      > > > > > The Vedia de cursu honorum says, in part: "No individual may assume the office of one of the ordinarii who has not been a registered citizen in good standing for at least six months." (II)
      > > > > >
      > > > > > Since I resigned and have returned, less than six months have passed. What does the law say about returning citizens?
      > > > > >
      > > > > > The lex Minucia Moravia de civitate eiuranda says, in part:
      > > > > >
      > > > > > "All rights and privileges of citizenship are restored in full to a returning Citizen at the time his or her citizenship is reestablished. This lex does not in itself restrict a returning Citizen in any way from lawfully pursuing any entitlements or official positions (via election or appointment) for which he or she would again become eligible." (VIII.A)
      > > > > >
      > > > > > A couple of days a go, I received an email from a citizen named Q. Caecilia Laeta asking if I thought that the waiver of the 90-day period was breaking the law. I answered that it could not possibly be, since the Senate's power to do so is *in* the law: The lex Minucia Moravia de civitate eiuranda also says: "At the discretion of the Senate, the normal waiting period of ninety (90) days may be waived." (VIII.B)
      > > > > >
      > > > > > My view is, of course, that since I have returned with the 90-day waiting period waived by the Senate in accordance with the law, I have returned "in full" and unrestricted, and since the law specifically says that I "again become eligible" when talking about pursuing an "official position (via election...)", I believe that this allows me to run for office in spite of the six months' time mentioned in the lex Vedia. No magistrate, from censor to consul to praetor, has made any indication publicly that they thought differently.
      > > > > >
      > > > > > So I ask you, the People: what do you think? Should I seek office now, as I believe I am entitled to do, or should I wait, because there is the hint of a question? There are two other candidates for the office I seek, so it's not like the vacancy will continue either way.
      > > > > >
      > > > > > Valete,
      > > > > >
      > > > > > Cato
      > > > > >
      > > > >
      > > > >
      > > > >
      > > > >
      > > > > ------------------------------------
      > > > >
      > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links
      > > > >
      > > >
      > > >
      > > >
      > > >
      > > > ------------------------------------
      > > >
      > > > Yahoo! Groups Links
      > > >
      > >
      > >
      > >
      > >
      > > ------------------------------------
      > >
      > > Yahoo! Groups Links
      > >
      >
      Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62902 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2009-04-10
      Subject: Re: Exposing Senate Acts of Illegality!
      Ave,

      Interesting again, I did not ask for your opinion, but hey, opinions vary. Given your loaded questions - completely understandable how you would come to that conclusion.

      Have a good day!

      Sulla

      --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "L Julia Aquila" <dis_pensible@...> wrote:
      >
      > Salve Senator Sulla,
      >
      > I did not insinuate. I state my questions and statement clearly.
      >
      > In my opinion your tactics are transparent, your accusations are reflections of your intent and you have no one but yourself to blame.
      >
      > Thank you for answering my questions Sir.
      >
      > Vale,
      >
      > L. Julia Aquila
      >
      >
      >
      > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Robert Woolwine" <l_cornelius_sulla@> wrote:
      > >
      > > Ave,
      > >
      > > You hope you do not mean to insinuate - but that is precisely what you just did! Nice job! ;)
      > >
      > > Again, you are not correct, in the back alley (BackAlley-subscribe@yahoogroups.com) - I said it is a vague law - not a bad law - if anything it needs to be expanded to prevent magistrates who hold a current position from running for any other position for at least a year. More of the Mos Maiorum is needed in NR.
      > >
      > > If the consuls wish to propose a law that would bring more of the Mos Maiorum to NR - I would support it.
      > >
      > > Vale,
      > >
      > > Sulla
      > >
      > >
      > >
      > >
      > > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "L Julia Aquila" <dis_pensible@> wrote:
      > > >
      > > > Salve Sulla,
      > > >
      > > > I never mentioned the Senate Seal.
      > > >
      > > > Senator Sulla, I do hope you do not mean to insinuate that the citizens of the Respublica are not intelligent enough to recognize how you use, once again, your manipulative oratory skills, i.e. the methods you employ, to once again further your own agenda through innuendo, gossip and hearsay.
      > > >
      > > > I should hope a Senator of such esteemed standing has better things to do then engage in such matters.
      > > >
      > > > Senator Sulla, I understand there is a vague aedile law, a problemic lex, Lex Cornelia Iunia de definitione intervallorum magistratuum.
      > > > You did write this law, correct?
      > > > You did, with levity, admit it was a bad law, correct?
      > > > Didn't this law cause problems in the past few days as evidenced on the mailing list with a potential candidate withdrawing his candidacy, correct?
      > > >
      > > > As you say, the more the people see what is going on, the better educated decisions they can make.
      > > >
      > > > Thank you for your time Senator.
      > > >
      > > > Vale,
      > > >
      > > > Julia Aquila
      > > >
      > > >
      > > >
      > > >
      > > >
      > > > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Robert Woolwine" <l_cornelius_sulla@> wrote:
      > > > >
      > > > > Ave,
      > > > >
      > > > > I am glad you agree!
      > > > >
      > > > > I am all for removing the Senate seal. As it is noted by political scientists - let the sun shine in the Senate. The more the people see what is going on - the better educated decisions they can make. And what better way to counter innuendo, gossip and hearsay!
      > > > >
      > > > > Vale,
      > > > >
      > > > > Sulla
      > > > >
      > > > > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "L Julia Aquila" <dis_pensible@> wrote:
      > > > > >
      > > > > > Salve Senator Sulla,
      > > > > >
      > > > > > I agree. I think the citizens see exactly what is going on.
      > > > > > You once again demonstrated your oratorical skill in the technique of deflection very clearly.
      > > > > > This is no laughing matter Senator, this is no Role Playing Game, this is serious.
      > > > > >
      > > > > > Again I implore the good citizens of Nova Roma to take note.
      > > > > >
      > > > > > Vale,
      > > > > >
      > > > > > L. Julia Aquila
      > > > > >
      > > > > >
      > > > > > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Robert Woolwine" <l_cornelius_sulla@> wrote:
      > > > > > >
      > > > > > > Nice try at deflection - But, it didn't fool me nor do I doubt the people of Nova Roma - but you get a A for effort! ;)
      > > > > > >
      > > > > > > Vale,
      > > > > > >
      > > > > > > Sulla
      > > > > > >
      > > > > > >
      > > > > > > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "L Julia Aquila" <dis_pensible@> wrote:
      > > > > > > >
      > > > > > > > Salve Senator Sulla,
      > > > > > > >
      > > > > > > > Nice try but latching on to simple words such as "fairly new" is just another oratory skill that even the worst used car salesmen learn without even a sales 101 course.
      > > > > > > > Thank you to illuminating for us, once again, that you often have very little to go and so you make so much of two little words.
      > > > > > > > Thank you also for demonstrating that you did not bother to read my response to you as to how I came about my information, apparently ignoring it, to push forward your own agenda.
      > > > > > > >
      > > > > > > > Is this the way you treat the citizens of Nova Roma?
      > > > > > > >
      > > > > > > > It appears to me it may not be the citizens of Nova Roma you wish to serve, but possibly, just possibly, the members of the Back Alley as you seem to direct your conversation to that ML quite a bit.
      > > > > > > >
      > > > > > > > I ask the citizens of Nova Roma to take note.
      > > > > > > >
      > > > > > > > How enlightening indeed.
      > > > > > > >
      > > > > > > > Vale,
      > > > > > > >
      > > > > > > > L. Julia Aquila
      > > > > > > >
      > > > > > > > P.S. It is Aquila Sir, not Aquilia. I am of the opinion that you pride yourself on paying attention to detail, does this not apply to a regular citizen?
      > > > > > > >
      > > > > > > >
      > > > > > > > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Robert Woolwine" <l_cornelius_sulla@> wrote:
      > > > > > > > >
      > > > > > > > > Aquilia, you cannot have it both ways - either you are a new citizen who is unfamiliar with NR - or you have been advised by certain individuals about certain other individuals.
      > > > > > > > >
      > > > > > > > > In the back alley we had this very discussion with Cornelius Lentulus and he named a slew of names of individuals who have taken it upon themselves to spread rumors and innuendo. Are you one of those who has been informed in such a manner - considering as you said to the Tribune - you are a fairly new member to Nova Roma?
      > > > > > > > >
      > > > > > > > > Vale,
      > > > > > > > >
      > > > > > > > > Sulla
      > > > > > > > >
      > > > > > > > > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "L Julia Aquila" <dis_pensible@> wrote:
      > > > > > > > > >
      > > > > > > > > > Salve Senator Sulla,
      > > > > > > > > >
      > > > > > > > > > Interesting that YOU intercept words directed at Tribune Galerius Aurelianus. This too is enlightening. Does this indicate that he speaks for you and those associated with you? One *could* conceivably make that connection. Again as a testament regarding your oratory skills, you neglected to leave out the word "fairly", as in "fairly new".
      > > > > > > > > >
      > > > > > > > > > As for "knowing" you, well thanks to Senator Iulius Caesar and the Ludi of last month, I learned quite a lot about you Senator Sulla. After all don't you take pride in being of a brotherhood who speaks their mind in public Senator Sulla?
      > > > > > > > > > How could I not know about you?
      > > > > > > > > > This is, after all, your purpose, to be known and to be heard.
      > > > > > > > > > I also, as demonstrated here, ask many questions, and many times absence of response is just as significant as an oratory exercise.
      > > > > > > > > >
      > > > > > > > > > Thank you Senator Sulla for your response.
      > > > > > > > > >
      > > > > > > > > > Now I await Tribune Aurelianus own response.
      > > > > > > > > >
      > > > > > > > > > Vale
      > > > > > > > > >
      > > > > > > > > > Julia Aquila
      > > > > > > >
      > > > > > >
      > > > > >
      > > > >
      > > >
      > >
      >
      Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62903 From: Aulus Scribonius Dento Date: 2009-04-10
      Subject: Re: McCarthyism OFF TOPIC
      "The Soviet Union and something called communism per se had not been the object of Washington 's global attacks. There had never been an International Communist Conspiracy. The enemy was, and remains, any government or movement, or even individual, that stands in the way of the expansion of the American Empire, by whatever name the US gives to the enemy - communist, rogue state, drug trafficker, terrorist." - William Blum, Killing Hope

      From: Stephen Gallagher <spqr753@...>
      To: Nova-Roma <nova-roma@yahoogroups.com>
      Sent: Friday, April 10, 2009 12:43:17 PM
      Subject: RE: [Nova-Roma] McCarthyism OFF TOPIC

      Salve Pius
       
      And while Senator McCarthy may not have had all the names or even had some of them wrong  history has shown that there were communists in the US government
      aiding and abetting the Soviet Union and the world wide Communist conspiracy.
       
      Some of the Soviet Spies are well know and other still remain unmasked.
      Alger Hiss was a Soviet spy and the left can never acknowledge that fact.
       
      Try reading the history of the Verona intercepts.
      Try reading Whitaker Chambers book Witness
       
       
      Vale
       
      Paulinus
       
       
       

       


      To: Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com
      From: from@darkeye. net
      Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2009 17:02:33 +0200
      Subject: [Nova-Roma] McCarthyism (Was: Exposing Senate Acts of Illegality!)



      Robert Woolwine wrote:
      > In the back alley we had this very discussion with Cornelius Lentulus and he named a slew of names of individuals who have taken it upon themselves to spread rumors and innuendo. Are you one of those who has been informed in such a manner - considering as you said to the Tribune - you are a fairly new member to Nova Roma?
      >

      " I have here in my hand a list of names that were made known to the
      Secretary of State as being members of the Communist Party and who
      nevertheless are still working and shaping policy in the State Department."

      "Are you now, or have you ever been, a member of the Communist Party?"

      /Pius



      Yahoo! Canada Toolbar : Search from anywhere on the web and bookmark your favourite sites. Download it now!

      Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62904 From: Publius Memmius Albucius Date: 2009-04-10
      Subject: McCarthyism: OFF TOPIC
      Praetor Albucius omnibus s.d.

      Please everyone close this chapter on Mac Carthysm, communism and U.S. policy.

      As every contributor has identified it, this matter is off topic and have no (more) place in our forum.

      If you are interested in, feel naturally free carrying on this discussion privately (in the "post message page", field "to", just click on on the arrow to let appear the address of the sender who you want to answer to, instead of "Nova-Roma@...".

      Thanks for your understanding. :-)

      Valete omnes,


      P. Memmius Albucius
      praetor


      --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Aulus Scribonius Dento <aulusscriboniusdento@...> wrote:
      >
      > "The Soviet Union and
      > something called communism per se had not been the object of Washington's global attacks. There had never
      > been an International Communist Conspiracy. The enemy was, and remains, any
      > government or movement, or even individual, that stands in the way of the
      > expansion of the American Empire, by whatever name the US gives to the
      > enemy - communist, rogue state, drug trafficker, terrorist." - William Blum, Killing Hope
      >
      > ________________________________
      > From: Stephen Gallagher <spqr753@...>
      > To: Nova-Roma <nova-roma@yahoogroups.com>
      > Sent: Friday, April 10, 2009 12:43:17 PM
      > Subject: RE: [Nova-Roma] McCarthyism OFF TOPIC
      >
      >
      >
      >
      >
      > Salve Pius
      >
      > And while Senator McCarthy may not have had all the names or even had some of them wrong history has shown that there were communists in the US government
      > aiding and abetting the Soviet Union and the world wide Communist conspiracy.
      >
      > Some of the Soviet Spies are well know and other still remain unmasked.
      > Alger Hiss was a Soviet spy and the left can never acknowledge that fact.
      >
      > Try reading the history of the Verona intercepts.
      > Try reading Whitaker Chambers book Witness
      >
      >
      > Vale
      >
      > Paulinus
      >
      >
      >
      >
      >
      >
      > ________________________________
      > To: Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com
      > From: from@darkeye. net
      > Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2009 17:02:33 +0200
      > Subject: [Nova-Roma] McCarthyism (Was: Exposing Senate Acts of Illegality!)
      >
      >
      >
      >
      > Robert Woolwine wrote:
      > > In the back alley we had this very discussion with Cornelius Lentulus and he named a slew of names of individuals who have taken it upon themselves to spread rumors and innuendo. Are you one of those who has been informed in such a manner - considering as you said to the Tribune - you are a fairly new member to Nova Roma?
      > >
      >
      > " I have here in my hand a list of names that were made known to the
      > Secretary of State as being members of the Communist Party and who
      > nevertheless are still working and shaping policy in the State Department."
      >
      > "Are you now, or have you ever been, a member of the Communist Party?"
      >
      > /Pius
      >
      >
      >
      >
      >
      > __________________________________________________________________
      > Yahoo! Canada Toolbar: Search from anywhere on the web, and bookmark your favourite sites. Download it now
      > http://ca.toolbar.yahoo.com
      >
      Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62907 From: deciusiunius Date: 2009-04-10
      Subject: Re: Moderation policy
      Salve Marine,

      As a former praetor I'll point out that you have more than a little discretion in how you apply that policy, which was never meant to cover new email addresses by old citizens but meant to be a review period for new citizens.


      Vale,

      Palladius


      --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Gnaeus Equitius Marinus <gawne@...> wrote:
      >
      > Robert Woolwine <l_cornelius_sulla@...> writes:
      >
      > [...]
      > > given my moderation on the ML by the totalitarian clique of the
      > > Praetors office.
      >
      > You are in a moderated status for the same reason everyone else who
      > joins the Nova Roma mailing list joins under moderation. It is the
      > stated policy and has been for many years. Given that your posts have
      > all been approved thus far, I think our actions speak for themselves.
      >
      >
      > CN-EQVIT-MARINVS
      >
      Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62908 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2009-04-11
      Subject: a.d. III Id. Apr.
      Cato omnibus in foro SPD

      Salvete omnes!

      Hodiernus dies est ante diem III Idus Aprilis; haec dies nefastus est.

      "Greeting the mother (who was called Metanira)
      The goddess deigned to join her lips to the child's.
      His pallor fled, his body suddenly seemed healthier:
      Such power flowed out of the goddess' mouth.
      There was joy in the house, in the father, mother
      And daughter: those three were the whole house.
      They soon set out a meal, curds in whey,
      Apples, and golden honey on the comb.
      Kind Ceres abstained, and gave to the boy
      Poppy seeds in warm milk to make him sleep.
      It was midnight: silent in peaceful slumber,
      The goddess took Triptolemus on her lap,
      Caressed him with her hand three times, and spoke
      Three spells, not to be sounded by mortal tongue,
      And she covered the boy's body with live embers
      On the hearth, so the fire would purge his mortal burden.
      His good, fond, foolish mother, waking from sleep,
      Crying: `What are you doing?' snatched him from the coals,
      To her the goddess said: `Though sinless, you've sinned:
      My gift's been thwarted by a mother's fear.
      He will still be mortal, but first to plough,
      And sow, and reap a harvest from the soil.'" - Ovid, Fasti IV

      "Are we to believe, then, that vines, not previously existing,
      appeared at a certain stage; and olives, likewise, and the gifts of
      Demeter [Ceres] and Core [Persephone]? And that some Triptolemus was
      the minister of such fruits?" - Plato, Laws 782b

      "For Triptolemos, the elder of Metaniera's sons, Demeter prepared a
      chariot of winged Drakones, and she gave him wheat, which he scattered
      all over the populated earth as he was carried along through the sky.
      Panyasis says that Triptolemos was the son of Eleusis, which is why
      Demeter came to him; but Pherekydes says that he was born of Okeanos
      and Gaia." - Apollodorus, The Library 1.32

      "When Ceres was hunting for her daughter, she came to King Eleusinus,
      whose wife Cothonea had borne the boy Triptolemus...On Triptolemus she
      conferred everlasting honour, for she gave him her chariot yoked with
      Serpents to spread the cultivation of grain. Riding in it he sowed
      grain throughout the earth. When he returned, Celeus bade him be
      killed for his benefactions, but when this was known, by Ceres' order
      he gave the kingdom to Triptolemus, who called it Eleusis from his
      father's name. He also established sacred rites in honour of Ceres,
      which hare called in Greek Thesmophoria." - Hyginus, Fabulae 147

      "[Ceres] taught her foster-son Triptolemus to sow grain. When he had
      sown it, and a pig rooted up what he had planted, he seized the pig,
      took it to the altar of Ceres, and putting grain on its head,
      sacrificed it to Ceres. From this cam the custom of putting salted
      meal on the victim." - Hyginus, Fabulae 277

      Today is held in ghonor of Triptolemus. According to the Homeric Hymn
      to Demeter (anonymous text of the 7th century B.C.) Triptolemos was
      one of the men who had great power and honor in Eleusis and was one of
      the chiefs among the people, protecting the city by their wisdom and
      true judgements. The Hymn also gives us the information that
      Triptolemos together with Diocles, Eumolpos, Keleus and Polyxeinus
      learned the mysteries and rites of the goddess Demeter.

      The later tradition, spread out by the Athenians, connected
      Triptolemos with the first civilization in Eleusis, cultivating the
      grain, a gift of Demeter. Triptolemos is described as a son of Keleus,
      the Eleusinian king and his wife Metaneira, who welcomed in their
      palace the goddess Demeter, when she was mourning for her daughter
      Kore. Demeter equited for their kindness, so she gave to Triptolemos
      the ears of a corn and she taught him to cultivate the fields.
      Triptolemos became a teacher of agriculture over the whole world. He
      was bringing this knowledge on his winged chariot from one place to
      the other, while Demeter and Persephone took care of him during this
      mission. In the later myths Triptolemos became after his death the
      judge in the underworld.

      The representation of Triptolemos became very popular and he was
      depicted on many Greek vases and inside reliefs, mainly during the
      Classical period. The oldest image of Triptolemos (dated from the 6th
      century B.C.) exists on the black-figured amphora from Les Musées
      Royaux in Brussels. Triptolemos is sitting on his wheeled throne,
      keeping the ears of a corn, while one of his companions is following
      him and an other man is thanking him for his mission.

      Valete bene!

      Cato
      Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62909 From: Cicero Date: 2009-04-11
      Subject: Candidacy for Quaestor
      Nova-Roma
      Salvete fellow citizens of Nova Roma
       
      I hereby officially announce my candidacy for the position of Quaestor in the upcoming elections.
       
      I have been a citizen of Nova Roma since 2003, and am currently a scriba of the Cohors Aedilicia. I have served the res publica in the capacity of Quaestor once before, in MDCCLVIII.
       
      In my macro life I work as a journalist and writer, and study classical culture, pagan religions and English literature.
       
      Should I be elected, I look forward to serving the citizens and Gods as a Queastor of Nova Roma. I humbly ask for you your support in the upcoming elections. 
       
      Bene Valete,
       
      Lucius Cornelius Cicero
       
       
      Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62910 From: c.aqvillivs_rota Date: 2009-04-11
      Subject: PRIEST / SOLDIERS NEEDED

      Salvete Omnes,

      I am currently looking for a NR Priest/s and or Priest/esses as well as soldiers for the performance of a Roman ritual here in South Carolina!

                                      (One single one would be fine too)

      Who is interested or can help out?

      Please respond to my e-mail C.Aqvillivs_ Rota@yahoo. com

      Optime vale

      C.AQVILLIVS ROTA

      Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62911 From: c.aqvillivs_rota Date: 2009-04-11
      Subject: TO ALL CITIZENS/PRESS RELEASE

      Salve Omnes,
       
       
      This is an official Press Release of Aquillius Rota, proud member of NR.
       
       
       
      I have great News
      from the Province of America Austrorientalis
      for all citizens
      of our Republic!
       
      An appropriate place, dedicated to our Republic, a place to meet and practice is soon available.
       
      The Grand Opening of the first Roman Event Bistro Inn
      on the Continent is close!
       
      Roman Life and Culture - Located in lovely South Carolina
       
      COMING SOON
      Just days away
       
       
       
      For Questions and Information please contact
      Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62912 From: vallenporter Date: 2009-04-11
      Subject: Re: TO ALL CITIZENS/PRESS RELEASE
      --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "c.aqvillivs_rota" <c.aqvillivs_rota@...> wrote:
      >
      >
      > Salve Omnes, This is an official Press Release of Aquillius Rota,
      > proud member of NR. I have great News from the Province of America
      > Austrorientalis for all citizens of our Republic! An appropriate
      > place, dedicated to our Republic, a place to meet and practice is soon
      > available. The Grand Opening of the first Roman Event Bistro Inn on
      > the Continent is close! Roman Life and Culture - Located in lovely
      > South Carolina COMING SOON Just days away For Questions and
      > Information please contact C.AQVILLIVS_ ROTA@Yahoo. com
      > <mailto:C.AQVILLIVS_ROTA@...>
      >
      Your e-mail does not work.
      Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62913 From: Gaius Petronius Dexter Date: 2009-04-11
      Subject: Re: Exposing Senate Acts of Illegality!
      C. Petronius L. Sullae s.p.d.,

      Why did you choose as NR citizen names the detestable names of L. Cornelius Sulla "Felix"? Do you dream about dictature and lists of proscription?

      Salve.
      C. Petronius Dexter
      Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62914 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2009-04-11
      Subject: Re: TO ALL CITIZENS/PRESS RELEASE
      Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: TO ALL CITIZENS/PRESS RELEASE

        A. Tullia Scholastica M. Cornelio Felici quiritibus, sociis, peregrinisque bonae voluntatis S.D.

          Generally it is a good idea to address one’s intended recipient and to sign one’s posts.  

      --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com <mailto:Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com> , "c.aqvillivs_rota" <c.aqvillivs_rota@...> wrote:
      >
      >
      > Salve Omnes,     This is an official Press Release of Aquillius Rota,
      > proud member of NR.       I have great News from the Province of America
      > Austrorientalis for all citizens of our Republic!   An appropriate
      > place, dedicated to our Republic, a place to meet and practice is soon
      > available.   The Grand Opening of the first Roman Event Bistro Inn on
      > the Continent is close!   Roman Life and Culture - Located in lovely
      > South Carolina   COMING SOON Just days away       For Questions and
      > Information please contact C.AQVILLIVS_ ROTA@Yahoo. com
      > <mailto:C.AQVILLIVS_ROTA@...>
      >
      Your e-mail does not work.


          ATS:  The e-mail does not work because there is an extra space between dot and com.  The other version is concealed by Yahoo; generally, it is not wise to post one’s e-mail address to a list as spammers and other demons will find it.  

      Vale, et valete.  

        
          
      Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62915 From: Publius Memmius Albucius Date: 2009-04-11
      Subject: IMPORTANT : forum to be closed on next Idus
      Praetores omnibus s.d.

      Care all : due to maintenance operations, our forum will be closed around 30 minutes, on this coming Monday 13th (Idus Apr.), on a time range from 9 pm Rome time (8 pm GMT) to 1 am Rome time (midnight GMT).

      See for more informations the message below, and check your local time.

      Thanks for your understanding. :-)

      Valete,


      For the praetura,
      P. Memmius Albucius pr.


      ----- Forwarded message from y_groups_team@... -----
      Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2009 20:07:33 -0000
      From: y_groups_team <y_groups_team@...>
      Reply-To: moderatorcentral-owner@yahoogroups.com
      Subject: [moderatorcentral] Planned Outage: Monday, April 13, 2009
      To: moderatorcentral@yahoogroups.com

      On Monday, April 13th, 2009 Yahoo! Groups will undergo scheduled
      maintenance. During this time your group will be unavailable for 30-60 minutes.

      The outage is currently scheduled to begin at 1 pm PT, 8 pm GMT. At
      this time, 1/4 of all Yahoo! Groups will become unavailable while the
      team services these groups. Once maintenance is complete on that 1/4
      of Groups, they will be made available again, and the next 1/4 will
      become unavailable until all of the groups have been serviced.

      In total the maintenance period should last around 5 hours, with the
      maintenance concluding around 6 pm PT, midnight GMT.

      While your group is being serviced, all features of your group,
      including messages, photos, attachments, etc. will be completely
      unavailable. However, once your outage time concludes, your group and
      all of its features should return and any messages that were posted to
      the group via email during this downtime will be sent out. Please note
      that your group's outage should only last around an hour.

      In an effort to better communicate to all of you, a blast message will
      be posted to all groups starting today and continuing on through April
      13th, 2009, linking to this message on the blog. This blast message is
      visible on all groups to all members and moderators.

      Thank you for your patience—during the outage, the blog
      (http://www.ygroupsblog.com) will remain up (and comments will remain
      open) and we will update you all as information becomes available.

      Melissa Daniels
      Yahoo! Community Manager
      Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62916 From: Gaius Petronius Dexter Date: 2009-04-11
      Subject: Re: IMPORTANT : forum to be closed on next Idus
      Dexter Albucio sal,

      > Care all : due to maintenance operations, our forum will be closed around 30 minutes, on this coming Monday 13th (Idus Apr.), on a time range from 9 pm Rome time (8 pm GMT) to 1 am Rome time (midnight GMT).

      Rome Time (on "summer time" id est since 29/march/2009 untill 25/October/2009) is GMT + 2 hours.

      Vale.
      C. Petronius Dexter
      Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62917 From: Q. Valerius Poplicola Date: 2009-04-11
      Subject: Re: Exposing Senate Acts of Illegality!
      Q. Valerius C. Petronio SPD

      That's really an unfair question no matter whence it comes. I call upon
      everyone to condemn such petty ad hominem attacks that are totally
      unwarranted and have no grounding in any facts.

      --------------------------------------------------
      From: "Gaius Petronius Dexter" <jfarnoud94@...>
      Sent: Saturday, April 11, 2009 2:49 AM
      To: <Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com>
      Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Exposing Senate Acts of Illegality!

      > C. Petronius L. Sullae s.p.d.,
      >
      > Why did you choose as NR citizen names the detestable names of L.
      > Cornelius Sulla "Felix"? Do you dream about dictature and lists of
      > proscription?
      >
      > Salve.
      > C. Petronius Dexter
      >
      >
      >
      >
      >
      Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62918 From: Steve Moore Date: 2009-04-11
      Subject: Declaration of Candidacy for Quaestor
      M. Valerius Potitus omnibus SPD.

      I hereby declare my candidacy for the position of Quaestor.

      I have been a citizen for two years. I am currently Aedilis of the Oppidum Fluminis Gilae. By profession, I am an accountant.

      Valete optime.
      Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62919 From: enodia2002 Date: 2009-04-11
      Subject: Disaster Relief
      Salvete Omnes


      Have any further steps been taken towards providing disaster relief for the victims in Italy?

      V Rutilia
      Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62920 From: Gaius Petronius Dexter Date: 2009-04-11
      Subject: Re: Exposing Senate Acts of Illegality!
      Q. Valerio suo C. Petronius s.p.d.,

      > That's really an unfair question no matter whence it comes.

      I like to know the depth of the choices. This name was not choosing by chance.

      > I call upon
      > everyone to condemn such petty ad hominem attacks that are totally
      > unwarranted and have no grounding in any facts.

      Where are attacks? If someone choose as names the names of a very detestable man for the Roman Republic, I want to know more. What is it behind this kind of choice?

      Apparently, you do not have the answer.


      Vale.
      C. Petronius Dexter
      Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62921 From: Lucius Cornelius Cicero Date: 2009-04-11
      Subject: Re: Exposing Senate Acts of Illegality!
      Salve

      The historical Sulla may be a detestable figure to you, but not to others.

      Certainly he did many things that were considered laudable by many even in his own time, just as he was then also hated by others for his other actions.

      If we decide that some names are "detestable" where will it end? What about Iulius Caesar? This is a name that has also obviously inspired the names of many citizens of NR. You can either hate Caesar as an enemy of the Republic or as a great ruler that tried to restore order. But he certainly did more to bring an end to the Republic than did Sulla, even if he could not have done what he did if it was not for Sulla. Do we declare Octavian to be evil because he officially brought an end to the republic, or do we hold Divus Augustus in high esteem for ushering in a golden age of peace and cultural expression in Rome? Was Brutus a hero or a villain?

      With Rome's history it is natural that depending on one's own sympathies and inclinations some figures will be considered "bad" and others "good". But we can't impose our own views of these figures on others to the point of deciding that their choice of name is inappropriate or that it says something about their own motives.

      I don't think Gnaeus Iulius Caesar is planning on having himself declared dictator for life nor do I think that anybody whose name was inspired by Cato the Younger is planning on committing suicide.

      In short, your argument is silly at best and ill-intentioned sniping at worst.

      Vale,

      L Cornelius Cicero

      --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Gaius Petronius Dexter" <jfarnoud94@...> wrote:
      >
      > C. Petronius L. Sullae s.p.d.,
      >
      > Why did you choose as NR citizen names the detestable names of L. Cornelius Sulla "Felix"? Do you dream about dictature and lists of proscription?
      >
      > Salve.
      > C. Petronius Dexter
      >
      Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62922 From: Q. Valerius Poplicola Date: 2009-04-11
      Subject: Re: Exposing Senate Acts of Illegality!
      And backfiring! Petronius Arbiter took his own life for plotting against
      Nero. Perhaps this Petronius wishes to do the same?

      Surely oh cives you see how ridiculous this is.

      --------------------------------------------------
      From: "Lucius Cornelius Cicero" <Cicero@...>
      Sent: Saturday, April 11, 2009 10:06 AM
      To: <Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com>
      Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Exposing Senate Acts of Illegality!

      > Salve
      >
      > The historical Sulla may be a detestable figure to you, but not to others.
      >
      > Certainly he did many things that were considered laudable by many even in
      > his own time, just as he was then also hated by others for his other
      > actions.
      >
      > If we decide that some names are "detestable" where will it end? What
      > about Iulius Caesar? This is a name that has also obviously inspired the
      > names of many citizens of NR. You can either hate Caesar as an enemy of
      > the Republic or as a great ruler that tried to restore order. But he
      > certainly did more to bring an end to the Republic than did Sulla, even if
      > he could not have done what he did if it was not for Sulla. Do we declare
      > Octavian to be evil because he officially brought an end to the republic,
      > or do we hold Divus Augustus in high esteem for ushering in a golden age
      > of peace and cultural expression in Rome? Was Brutus a hero or a villain?
      >
      > With Rome's history it is natural that depending on one's own sympathies
      > and inclinations some figures will be considered "bad" and others "good".
      > But we can't impose our own views of these figures on others to the point
      > of deciding that their choice of name is inappropriate or that it says
      > something about their own motives.
      >
      > I don't think Gnaeus Iulius Caesar is planning on having himself declared
      > dictator for life nor do I think that anybody whose name was inspired by
      > Cato the Younger is planning on committing suicide.
      >
      > In short, your argument is silly at best and ill-intentioned sniping at
      > worst.
      >
      > Vale,
      >
      > L Cornelius Cicero
      >
      > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Gaius Petronius Dexter"
      > <jfarnoud94@...> wrote:
      >>
      >> C. Petronius L. Sullae s.p.d.,
      >>
      >> Why did you choose as NR citizen names the detestable names of L.
      >> Cornelius Sulla "Felix"? Do you dream about dictature and lists of
      >> proscription?
      >>
      >> Salve.
      >> C. Petronius Dexter
      >>
      >
      >
      >
      Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62923 From: Q. Valerius Poplicola Date: 2009-04-11
      Subject: Re: Exposing Senate Acts of Illegality!
      Q. Valerius C. Petronio sal.

      No, I do not have an answer, because I am not Sulla. I do however object to
      your characterization, and it is both despicable and dishonorable. Asking if
      someone has murderous or dictatorial tendencies just because their namesake
      did is tantamount to accusing you of harboring anti-Roman sympathies because
      your Gallic ancestors did! Why are you French? Don't you hate Rome, Galle?
      It is the mark of a coward who tries to smear his opponent by irrelevant
      facts rather than coming out in the fore and assessing his deeds in an
      honest fashion. With your style, I might as well say, When will you quit
      plotting against Rome, Petroni (you're not the only Petronius, you know).

      Moreover, it's a sign of willful ignorance to think that Sulla is famous for
      one and only one terrible thing: proscription lists in his extensive
      dictatorship. This is ignoring his long and active life, first capturing
      Juba with Marius, then successfully putting down Italian rebels, subduing
      Mithridates, and then putting an end to C. Marius' faction who had before
      Sulla begun the proscription lists. Not to mention that Sulla as dictator is
      by far more legal than Marius' 7 terms as consul.

      And before you again try to plead innocent, do familiarize yourself with
      Plurimum Interrogationum:
      http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plurium_interrogationum and Leading Question:
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leading_question

      Vale.
      --------------------------------------------------
      From: "Gaius Petronius Dexter" <jfarnoud94@...>
      Sent: Saturday, April 11, 2009 11:53 AM
      To: <Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com>
      Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Exposing Senate Acts of Illegality!

      > Q. Valerio suo C. Petronius s.p.d.,
      >
      >> That's really an unfair question no matter whence it comes.
      >
      > I like to know the depth of the choices. This name was not choosing by
      > chance.
      >
      >> I call upon
      >> everyone to condemn such petty ad hominem attacks that are totally
      >> unwarranted and have no grounding in any facts.
      >
      > Where are attacks? If someone choose as names the names of a very
      > detestable man for the Roman Republic, I want to know more. What is it
      > behind this kind of choice?
      >
      > Apparently, you do not have the answer.
      >
      >
      > Vale.
      > C. Petronius Dexter
      >
      >
      Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62924 From: Gaius Petronius Dexter Date: 2009-04-11
      Subject: Re: Exposing Senate Acts of Illegality!
      C. Petronius L. Ciceroni s.p.d.,

      > The historical Sulla may be a detestable figure to you, but not to others.

      He was not detestable for me, because I was not born when he lived, but he was very detestable for the Roman republic.

      > Certainly he did many things that were considered laudable by many even in his own time, just as he was then also hated by others for his other actions.

      Nobody can like the lists of proscription.

      > If we decide that some names are "detestable" where will it end?

      I can ask why a name like that is chosen.

      > What about Iulius Caesar?

      It was not my question. I asked for the name of Sulla. Comparison is not reason.

      Sulla was detestable for the Roman Republic, the first he drew up lists of proscription. I wanted to know why our NR Sulla "Felix" chose a so branded name.

      [...]

      > In short, your argument is silly at best and ill-intentioned sniping at worst.

      It was not an argument but a question, whose apparently you do not have the answer.

      Vale.
      C. Petronius Dexter
      Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62925 From: Gnaeus Iulius Caesar Date: 2009-04-11
      Subject: CURULE AEDILE EDICT 62-08: APPOINTMENT AND DISMISSAL OF SCRIBAE
      Cn. Iulius Caesar aed. Quiritibus sal.

      CURULE AEDILE EDICT 62-08: APPOINTMENT AND DISMISSAL OF SCRIBAE

      I hereby appoint the following citizen as scribe, to be assigned
      to one or more of the five work groups within the Cohors Aedilicia. No
      oath is required of her.

      Quinta Caelia Laeta

      I hereby formally dismiss the following scribes:

      Gnaeus Caelius Ahenobarbus - due to resignation
      Gaius Terentius Varro - due to resignation
      Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62926 From: Gaius Petronius Dexter Date: 2009-04-11
      Subject: Re: Exposing Senate Acts of Illegality!
      C. Petronius Valerio s.p.d.,

      > No, I do not have an answer, because I am not Sulla.

      Ok.

      > Asking if someone has murderous or dictatorial tendencies just because their namesake did is tantamount to accusing you of harboring anti-Roman sympathies because your Gallic ancestors did! Why are you French? Don't you hate Rome, Galle?

      I did not choose my ancestors, and my Aedui ancestors were pro-Romans, but in NR we choose our names.

      And a choice, in my opinion, is always motived.

      Vale.
      C. Petronius Dexter
      Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62927 From: Gaius Petronius Dexter Date: 2009-04-11
      Subject: Re: Exposing Senate Acts of Illegality!
      C.Petronius Q. Valerio s.p.d.,

      >> And backfiring! Petronius Arbiter took his own life for plotting against Nero. Perhaps this Petronius wishes to do the same?<<

      Petronius Arbiter is not the same name than C. Petronius Dexter.

      > Surely oh cives you see how ridiculous this is.

      Yes it is. But that does not answer to the question.

      Vale.
      C. Petronius Dexter
      Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62928 From: Lucius Cornelius Cicero Date: 2009-04-11
      Subject: Re: Exposing Senate Acts of Illegality!
      Salve

      >He was not detestable for me, because I was not born when he lived, >but he was very detestable for the Roman republic.

      Who is "the Roman republic"? And when did it tell you this?

      <It was not an argument but a question, whose apparently you do not <
      <have the answer.

      It was not just "a question". You attempted to answer it yourself when you asked it by implying that he chose it because he liked the idea of proscriptions and harbored desires to be a dictator. It was a leading question, and for all intents and purposes, you used it almost as a rhetorical question.

      You could have asked it in a much less ad hominem manner, by simply asking why he chose this name, or if you wanted to go further, asking why he chose it considering that Sulla was a controversial figure, instead of impugning the latter-day Sulla's character by the very way the question was framed.

      Here's my question for you: What problem do you have with the NR Sulla? Why attempt to cast aspersions on his character in public and then attempt to hide your intent by claiming it was simply "a question"? What is your game?

      You know what, our Roma Antiqua forefathers weren't averse to public insults and attacking the characters of their opponents, but at least they were honest in doing so and didn't attempt to hide their intentions. If you think Sulla is a murder-loving megalomaniac, why not just come out and say it directly?

      Cicero


      --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Gaius Petronius Dexter" <jfarnoud94@...> wrote:
      >
      > C. Petronius L. Ciceroni s.p.d.,

      >
      > Nobody can like the lists of proscription.
      >
      > > If we decide that some names are "detestable" where will it end?
      >
      > I can ask why a name like that is chosen.
      >
      > > What about Iulius Caesar?
      >
      > It was not my question. I asked for the name of Sulla. Comparison is not reason.
      >
      > Sulla was detestable for the Roman Republic, the first he drew up lists of proscription. I wanted to know why our NR Sulla "Felix" chose a so branded name.
      >
      > [...]
      >
      > > In short, your argument is silly at best and ill-intentioned sniping at worst.
      >
      > It was not an argument but a question, whose apparently you do not have the answer.
      >
      > Vale.
      > C. Petronius Dexter
      >
      Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62929 From: Lucius Cornelius Cicero Date: 2009-04-11
      Subject: Re: Exposing Senate Acts of Illegality!
      Salve

      > > Surely oh cives you see how ridiculous this is.
      >
      > Yes it is. But that does not answer to the question.

      So if you admit it's ridiculous why do you ask it? Why do you still demand an answer to an admittedly ridiculous question? Ulterior motives perhaps?

      Cicero
      Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62930 From: Gaius Petronius Dexter Date: 2009-04-11
      Subject: Re: Exposing Senate Acts of Illegality!
      C. Petronius L. Ciceroni s.p.d.,

      >> So if you admit it's ridiculous why do you ask it?

      It is ridiculous to compare Petronius Arbiter with C. Petronius Dexter

      >> Why do you still demand an answer to an admittedly ridiculous question?<<

      My question is not ridiculous. And you do not seem able to give an answer to it.

      Though it is mentally interesting for me to know why a NR citizen choose as names the names of a dictator so harmful to the Roman Republic.


      Vale.
      C. Petronius Dexter
      Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62931 From: Gaius Petronius Dexter Date: 2009-04-11
      Subject: Re: Exposing Senate Acts of Illegality!
      C. Petronius L. Ciceroni s.p.d.,

      > It was not just "a question". You attempted to answer it yourself when you asked it by implying that he chose it because he liked the idea of proscriptions and harbored desires to be a dictator. It was a leading question, and for all intents and purposes, you used it almost as a rhetorical question.

      But why do you want to answer instead of Sulla himself when you do not know the answer of his naming choices. I read on this forum that Sulla likes the good choice of the words and, so, I am sure that he can reply by himself to my question.

      Vale.
      C. Petronius Dexter
      Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62932 From: Q. Valerius Poplicola Date: 2009-04-11
      Subject: Re: Exposing Senate Acts of Illegality!
      Your ridiculous question deserves no answer at all.

      --------------------------------------------------
      From: "Gaius Petronius Dexter" <jfarnoud94@...>
      Sent: Saturday, April 11, 2009 6:46 PM
      To: <Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com>
      Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Exposing Senate Acts of Illegality!

      > C.Petronius Q. Valerio s.p.d.,
      >
      >>> And backfiring! Petronius Arbiter took his own life for plotting against
      >>> Nero. Perhaps this Petronius wishes to do the same?<<
      >
      > Petronius Arbiter is not the same name than C. Petronius Dexter.
      >
      >> Surely oh cives you see how ridiculous this is.
      >
      > Yes it is. But that does not answer to the question.
      >
      > Vale.
      > C. Petronius Dexter
      >
      >
      >
      Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62933 From: Q. Valerius Poplicola Date: 2009-04-11
      Subject: Re: Exposing Senate Acts of Illegality!
      Here he continues! I think Sulla could have an NR lawsuit on his hand,
      considering that Petronius here just implicitly labeled him a murderous
      dictator-wannabe.

      --------------------------------------------------
      From: "Gaius Petronius Dexter" <jfarnoud94@...>
      Sent: Saturday, April 11, 2009 7:20 PM
      To: <Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com>
      Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Exposing Senate Acts of Illegality!

      > C. Petronius L. Ciceroni s.p.d.,
      >
      >>> So if you admit it's ridiculous why do you ask it?
      >
      > It is ridiculous to compare Petronius Arbiter with C. Petronius Dexter
      >
      >>> Why do you still demand an answer to an admittedly ridiculous
      >>> question?<<
      >
      > My question is not ridiculous. And you do not seem able to give an answer
      > to it.
      >
      > Though it is mentally interesting for me to know why a NR citizen choose
      > as names the names of a dictator so harmful to the Roman Republic.
      >
      >
      > Vale.
      > C. Petronius Dexter
      >
      >
      >
      >
      >
      >
      Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62934 From: Q. Valerius Poplicola Date: 2009-04-11
      Subject: Re: Exposing Senate Acts of Illegality!
      Since it is a fact (and now a well-known fact) that the praetores are
      purposefully keeping Sulla under close moderation, and since the fact that
      your question is invalid and ridiculous, why should Sulla attempt to respond
      to your slander?

      --------------------------------------------------
      From: "Gaius Petronius Dexter" <jfarnoud94@...>
      Sent: Saturday, April 11, 2009 7:28 PM
      To: <Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com>
      Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Exposing Senate Acts of Illegality!

      > C. Petronius L. Ciceroni s.p.d.,
      >
      >> It was not just "a question". You attempted to answer it yourself when
      >> you asked it by implying that he chose it because he liked the idea of
      >> proscriptions and harbored desires to be a dictator. It was a leading
      >> question, and for all intents and purposes, you used it almost as a
      >> rhetorical question.
      >
      > But why do you want to answer instead of Sulla himself when you do not
      > know the answer of his naming choices. I read on this forum that Sulla
      > likes the good choice of the words and, so, I am sure that he can reply by
      > himself to my question.
      >
      > Vale.
      > C. Petronius Dexter
      >
      >
      >
      >
      >
      >
      Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62935 From: c.aqvillivs_rota Date: 2009-04-11
      Subject: A REAL PRIEST
      Salvete,

      is there really no one out there???


      Vale

      Rota
      Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62936 From: Aqvillivs Rota Date: 2009-04-11
      Subject: Re: Exposing Senate Acts of Illegality!
      Salvete,
       
      "Nomen est omen"
      (Though it is mentally interesting for me to know why a NR citizen choose as names the names of a dictator so harmful to the Roman Republic.)
       
      Indeed interesting how our names come up! Some have even real Roman blood in their veines, some don't.
       
      It always comes down to the fact that theory's biggest enemy is reality. And not to forget that reality can produce virtuality - But Virtuality can not produce reality.
       
      What follows is......A virtual Sulla or Caesar can only exist virtual. So do not worry. every thing else beyond that remains a pink teenage dream.
       
      NR needs to stay focused on reality.  And luckily virtual Sulla's and Caesar's remain without value.
       
      Dear citizens, choose reality concerning all matters of our Republic and it might turn out that the one or the other among us will turn from Lion or Snake to Mouse or even Micky Mouse.
       
      Vale
      Real Roman Blood
       
       
       
       
       
       

       


      From: Gaius Petronius Dexter <jfarnoud94@...>
      To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
      Sent: Saturday, April 11, 2009 8:20:10 PM
      Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Exposing Senate Acts of Illegality!

      C. Petronius L. Ciceroni s.p.d.,

      >> So if you admit it's ridiculous why do you ask it?

      It is ridiculous to compare Petronius Arbiter with C. Petronius Dexter

      >> Why do you still demand an answer to an admittedly ridiculous question?<<

      My question is not ridiculous. And you do not seem able to give an answer to it.

      Though it is mentally interesting for me to know why a NR citizen choose as names the names of a dictator so harmful to the Roman Republic.

      Vale.
      C. Petronius Dexter


      Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62937 From: Lucius Cornelius Cicero Date: 2009-04-11
      Subject: Re: Exposing Senate Acts of Illegality!
      Salve

      >But why do you want to answer instead of Sulla himself

      Sulla is being illegally censored here on the ML. You are of course free and have been since the beginning to e-mail or PM him privately to get an answer to your question. Alternatively, you can join the Back Alley board at http://groups.yahoo.com/group/BackAlley and pose the question to Sulla there, where there is no moderation.

      I sincerely hope you take one of these options, since it would go some way towards proving that your question was honest and not merely a political stunt. Otherwise, if this is what it appears to be by virtue of the question being asked in public and in the manner that it was, the whole event says more about your character than it does about Sulla's.

      Vale,

      Cicero
      Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62938 From: Lucius Cornelius Cicero Date: 2009-04-11
      Subject: Re: Exposing Senate Acts of Illegality!
      You're just going to keep on singing the same song aren't you? Good luck with that.

      --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Gaius Petronius Dexter" <jfarnoud94@...> wrote:
      >
      > C. Petronius L. Ciceroni s.p.d.,
      >
      > >> So if you admit it's ridiculous why do you ask it?
      >
      > It is ridiculous to compare Petronius Arbiter with C. Petronius Dexter
      >
      > >> Why do you still demand an answer to an admittedly ridiculous question?<<
      >
      > My question is not ridiculous. And you do not seem able to give an answer to it.
      >
      > Though it is mentally interesting for me to know why a NR citizen choose as names the names of a dictator so harmful to the Roman Republic.
      >
      >
      > Vale.
      > C. Petronius Dexter
      >
      Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62939 From: vallenporter Date: 2009-04-11
      Subject: Re: For Gens Reform, many Doubts
      --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "L. Sicinius Drusus" <lsicinius@...> wrote:
      >
      > Well I can certainly see problems with this lex.
      >
      > First of all the 10% minimum quota for Patricians is
      > absurdly high. By the Late Republic there were roughly
      > 55 Patricain families in a city with a population of
      > between 600,000 and 1,000,000.
      >
      > I Prefer my Proposed maxium of 5% of the population
      > with no new Patrician families beyond that figure, and
      > truefully even that 5% is far too high to be historic.
      >
      > This section is by far the worst part.
      >
      > "1. Each physically separate household led by a
      > Citizen of legal age shall be considered a separate
      > and independent familia of 'sui iuris' status. Each
      > Citizen of Nova Roma must be a member (or leader) of a
      > familia.
      >
      > The Roman family was what is now called an extended
      > family. It didn't just consist of two adults and some
      > children. It was multi-generational. If you define a
      > modern household as a family this law has the same
      > effect as the present system. It creates legal
      > roadblocks for those who wish to set up a true Roman
      > family.
      >
      > This is just replacing one ahistoric model that
      > citizens are locked into with another ahistoric model
      > that citizens are locked into.
      >
      > --- Marcus Octavius Germanicus <hucke@...>
      > wrote:
      > > Salve Luci Sicini,
      > >
      > > > DRUSUS: It's fairly easy to suport the secrective
      > > > Cassius/Labienus proposal since no one outside the
      > > > Senate has the slightest idea exactly what is in
      > > that
      > > > proposal.
      > >
      > > Actually, it was posted here:
      > >
      > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma/message/2599
      > >
      > > > For all any of us know the Junior Consul
      > > > vetoed it over a clause that the Paterfamilis of
      > > > Cornelia have a steak driven through his heart.
      > > ;o)
      > >
      > > That part was eliminated in committee.
      > >
      > > Vale, Octavius.
      > >
      > > --
      > > Marcus Octavius Germanicus, Consul of Nova Roma
      > > Candidate for Censor 2756:
      > > http://romanrepublic.org/octavius/censor/
      > >
      > >
      >
      >
      > =====
      > L. Sicinius Drusus
      >
      > "Quemadmodum gladius neminem occidit, occidentis telum est."
      > (A sword never kills anybody; it is a tool in the killer's hand.)
      > Seneca, Letters to Lucilius
      >
      > __________________________________________________
      > Do you Yahoo!?
      > Yahoo! Web Hosting - Let the expert host your site
      > http://webhosting.yahoo.com
      >
      Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62940 From: vallenporter Date: 2009-04-11
      Subject: Re: Sea-change?
      from nov 17 2002

      all that was old is new again. can we call this all old hat now and move on?

      Marcus Conrelius Felix---

      In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "danedwardsuk" <danedwardsuk@...> wrote:
      >
      > Salvete Omnes,
      >
      > Maybe it's just me, but all of a sudden I am becoming aware of an ever increasing factionalisation and political polarisation within Nova Roma. Concepts and ideologies defined by new terminologies such as 'modernist' and 'reconstructionist' are being banded about with some ferocity, and, at first sight it seems evident that the 'modernists' are holding sway.
      >
      > I rather thought that I was detecting a sea-change in Nova Roman politics, prompted by a quite dramatic groundswell of support for candidates who espouse this more modernist point of view. This perception has rather been encouraged by the heavy traffic of post generated on this list endorsing these very same candidates. On closer observation, however, it seems that these endorsements mostly emanate from those who hold this point of view most dear to their hearts. All well and good, of course, but it seems to me that this only serves to exacerbate the factionalism that exists within Nova Roma.
      >
      > Of course, who am I to judge. It's only natural I suppose, the nature of endorsements being what they are, but it does all rather appear self congratulating. Further, I do wonder if this heavy traffic of endorsements actually translates into support at the polls. Are the 'modernists' really as prevailing as these posts lead us to believe. A week to go till we find out, I suppose.
      >
      > Just a sunday morning reflection that I thought I'd share with you. With just three hours to go before voting commences I'd like to personally wish all candidates the best of luck in these elections.
      >
      > Valete
      >
      > Decimus Iunius Silanus.
      >
      >
      > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
      >
      Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62941 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2009-04-11
      Subject: Re: A REAL PRIEST
      Cato Aquillio Rotae sal.

      Salve.

      You're looking for someone who can perform the rites of the religio Romana in So. Carolina, yes? Have you contacted Fl. Galerius Aurelianus?

      Vale,

      Cato

      --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "c.aqvillivs_rota" <c.aqvillivs_rota@...> wrote:
      >
      >
      > Salvete,
      >
      > is there really no one out there???
      >
      >
      > Vale
      >
      > Rota
      >
      Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62942 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2009-04-11
      Subject: Re: Exposing Senate Acts of Illegality!
      Cato omnibus in foro SPD

      Salvete!

      It's too bad no-one has given me grief about my name; "Cato" is a word indicating that practical wisdom which is the result of natural sagacity, combined with experience of civil and political affairs.

      That's me! :)

      Valete,

      Cato

      --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Lucius Cornelius Cicero" <Cicero@...> wrote:
      >
      > You're just going to keep on singing the same song aren't you? Good luck with that.
      >
      > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Gaius Petronius Dexter" <jfarnoud94@> wrote:
      > >
      > > C. Petronius L. Ciceroni s.p.d.,
      > >
      > > >> So if you admit it's ridiculous why do you ask it?
      > >
      > > It is ridiculous to compare Petronius Arbiter with C. Petronius Dexter
      > >
      > > >> Why do you still demand an answer to an admittedly ridiculous question?<<
      > >
      > > My question is not ridiculous. And you do not seem able to give an answer to it.
      > >
      > > Though it is mentally interesting for me to know why a NR citizen choose as names the names of a dictator so harmful to the Roman Republic.
      > >
      > >
      > > Vale.
      > > C. Petronius Dexter
      > >
      >
      Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62943 From: Gaius Petronius Dexter Date: 2009-04-11
      Subject: Re: Exposing Senate Acts of Illegality!
      C. Petronius Q. Valerio s.p.d.,

      > Here he continues!

      You too, I see.

      > I think Sulla could have an NR lawsuit on his hand,

      I think that you present him not in his best side.

      > considering that Petronius here just implicitly labeled him a
      > murderous dictator-wannabe.

      It would be a very ridiculous case. A law against a question? Where are you living?

      Do not worry, Socrates also, relatively speaking, had many ridiculous questions. But as he knew the main thing are the answers.

      But, unlike him, I shall not drink the hemlock.:o)

      Vale.
      C. Petronius Dexter
      Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62944 From: PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@aol.com Date: 2009-04-11
      Subject: Re: Exposing Senate Acts of Illegality!
      Fl. Galerius Aurelianus sal.

      I wrote to my cousin, Appius Galerius, and discussed his post.  I feel that he has been admonished sufficiently and I doubt that he will act in such a precipitous fashion again.  All magistrates have a tendency to act passionately during their first time in public office and have been known to overstep the bounds of either tradition or law.  I hope that my fellow citizens will treat his post as an honest mistake and keep in mind that we all make mistakes; some of which are posted.

      Valete.


      -----Original Message-----
      From: gaiuspopilliuslaenas <gaiuspopillius@...>
      To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
      Sent: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 4:18 pm
      Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Exposing Senate Acts of Illegality!



      Laenas Cato sal.

      The Tribune has exceeded his reporting responsibilities and he has done a dsservice to Nova Roma with the title of his post and making accusations without any evidence or specifics.

      I expect the Censors to post something on this matter soon.

      Vale bene.

      Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62945 From: Maior Date: 2009-04-11
      Subject: Re: Exposing Senate Acts of Illegality!
      M. Hortensia G. Petronio spd;
      you are very astute. As so far there is a lot of argument against you but no answer yet to your question.

      Now as for me, I chose to revive gens Hortensia for this remarkable woman who protested the Oppian law. I made sure though, that I was not Quinta Hortensia, after the historical Q. Hortensius Hortalus, as indeed this would be roleplaying, having the exact name of a historical person.

      Who we regard and why when we take a name is indeed significant.
      For those who don't know about this great Hortensia please read here:
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hortensia_(orator)
      able oratrix, univir, Illustra Hortensia
      optime valete
      Marca Hortensia Maior

      > It would be a very ridiculous case. A law against a question? Where are you living?
      >
      > Do not worry, Socrates also, relatively speaking, had many ridiculous questions. But as he knew the main thing are the answers.
      >
      > But, unlike him, I shall not drink the hemlock.:o)
      >
      > Vale.
      > C. Petronius Dexter
      >
      Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62946 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2009-04-11
      Subject: Re: Exposing Senate Acts of Illegality!
      Cato Fl. Galerio Aureliano sal.

      Salve.

      Now, I think you may actually, as kind as you are, have even been a little too hard on your cousin. Yes, his expressions were a little over-the-top, but in basics he certainly did not overstep his bounds or do a "disservice" to the State or the Senate.

      We have already seen it definitively shown that there is no legal "seal" on the Senate; it is part of the tribunes' duties to report what he sees in a way that makes him feel that the People know what is being discussed in the Senate.

      At least one part of his post reflected a very real and very serious error on the part of the Senate, with regards to the "calling" of a so-called "meeting" of the "Board of Directors".

      So I would not be so hasty to chastise him for reacting to what may have been a rather disturbing chain of events within the Senate House.

      Vale,

      Cato



      --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@... wrote:
      >
      >
      > Fl. Galerius Aurelianus sal.
      >
      > I wrote to my cousin, Appius Galerius, and discussed his post.? I feel that he has been admonished sufficiently and I doubt that he will act in such a precipitous fashion again.? All magistrates have a tendency to act passionately during their first time in public office and have been known to overstep the bounds of either tradition or law.? I hope that my fellow citizens will treat his post as an honest mistake and keep in mind that we all make mistakes; some of which are posted.
      >
      > Valete.
      Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62947 From: Kristoffer From Date: 2009-04-11
      Subject: Re: Exposing Senate Acts of Illegality!
      Lucius Cornelius Cicero wrote:
      > Sulla is being illegally censored here on the ML.

      Salve,

      According to the words of the praetor, whom I trust, Sulla has not been
      censored on the main list. He is on moderated status, but every single
      one of his e-mails has been allowed through without any changes. He is
      being watched, not censored.

      And certainly not illegally so. The praetors are performing their duties
      to the best of their abilities in adherence to laws and guidelines.

      Vale, Pius.
      Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62948 From: gualterus_graecus Date: 2009-04-11
      Subject: Re: Exposing Senate Acts of Illegality!
      Salve Maior,

      Whatever the actual motivation(s) behind Sulla's name choice, I think we can both agree that Dexter's question could have been phrased in a more friendly manner and that in how it actually was phrased it much more resembled troll bait than a sincere desire for communucation.

      Vale,

      Gualterus Graecus

      --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Maior" <rory12001@...> wrote:
      >
      > M. Hortensia G. Petronio spd;
      > you are very astute. As so far there is a lot of argument against you but no answer yet to your question.
      >
      > Now as for me, I chose to revive gens Hortensia for this remarkable woman who protested the Oppian law. I made sure though, that I was not Quinta Hortensia, after the historical Q. Hortensius Hortalus, as indeed this would be roleplaying, having the exact name of a historical person.
      >
      > Who we regard and why when we take a name is indeed significant.
      > For those who don't know about this great Hortensia please read here:
      > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hortensia_(orator)
      > able oratrix, univir, Illustra Hortensia
      > optime valete
      > Marca Hortensia Maior
      >
      > > It would be a very ridiculous case. A law against a question? Where are you living?
      > >
      > > Do not worry, Socrates also, relatively speaking, had many ridiculous questions. But as he knew the main thing are the answers.
      > >
      > > But, unlike him, I shall not drink the hemlock.:o)
      > >
      > > Vale.
      > > C. Petronius Dexter
      > >
      >
      Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62949 From: vallenporter Date: 2009-04-11
      Subject: Re: Exposing Senate Acts of Illegality!
      --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Kristoffer From <from@...> wrote:
      >
      > Lucius Cornelius Cicero wrote:
      > > Sulla is being illegally censored here on the ML.
      >
      > Salve,
      >
      > According to the words of the praetor, whom I trust, Sulla has not been
      > censored on the main list. He is on moderated status, but every single
      > one of his e-mails has been allowed through without any changes. He is
      > being watched, not censored.
      >
      > And certainly not illegally so. The praetors are performing their duties
      > to the best of their abilities in adherence to laws and guidelines.
      >
      > Vale, Pius.


      Salve
      Why should a Officer of the Corp NR inc. be moderating a person who is on the BOD of said corp.
      that is very close to braking the state of maine law on corp where " no-one even a another officer of a corp can stop a person on the Bod from finding out info for the good of the corp etc"

      senators should never be moderated

      Vale Marcus Conrelius Felix
      >
      Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62950 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2009-04-11
      Subject: Re: Exposing Senate Acts of Illegality!
      Cato omnibus in foro SPD

      Salvete.

      I had to read Pius' post a couple of times because I wasn't sure that someone, reporting the words of an elected magistrate of this res publica, would actually use a Cold War term like "watched".

      Is this the type of government we want - one that will "watch" us - and actually have the temerity to allow someone to announce this as if it is a good thing - if they don't like what we say?

      Who will be "watched" next?

      This arrogance, this raw abuse of the power given to our magistrates, is stunning. The moderation of anyone simply because they are speaking in ways that the magistrate may not like - without notice or warning and for no legally-valid reason - is unconstitutional; it is yet another violation of the law, the law which these magistrates swore an oath by the Gods and Goddesses of Rome to uphold and protect.

      It's that simple.

      Valete,

      Cato


      --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Kristoffer From <from@...> wrote:
      >
      > Lucius Cornelius Cicero wrote:
      > > Sulla is being illegally censored here on the ML.
      >
      > Salve,
      >
      > According to the words of the praetor, whom I trust, Sulla has not been
      > censored on the main list. He is on moderated status, but every single
      > one of his e-mails has been allowed through without any changes. He is
      > being watched, not censored.
      >
      > And certainly not illegally so. The praetors are performing their duties
      > to the best of their abilities in adherence to laws and guidelines.
      >
      > Vale, Pius.
      >
      Group: Nova-Roma Message: 62951 From: Maior Date: 2009-04-12
      Subject: Re: Exposing Senate Acts of Illegality!
      Salve Graece;
      I know Petronius Dexter, he's a wonderful latinist, and is one of the rare Nova Romans who has made the transition from knowing the Classics into living Romanitas.

      So I can assure you, when he asks a question, he is doing it from his Romanitas. Dexter is a doer, he is part of the Circulus Latinus Lutetiensis (Latin Circle of Paris}, a Flamen Portunalis, one of the erudite Gaulois.
      Galli nolunt appellari; as you can imagine;-)
      [ they don't like being called Galli, shades of the eunuch priests of Magna Mater! so I call them Gauls]

      optime vale
      Maior




      >
      > Salve Maior,
      >
      > Whatever the actual motivation(s) behind Sulla's name choice, I think we can both agree that Dexter's question could have been phrased in a more friendly manner and that in how it actually was phrased it much more resembled troll bait than a sincere desire for communucation.
      >
      > Vale,
      >
      > Gualterus Graecus
      >
      > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Maior" <rory12001@> wrote:
      > >
      > > M. Hortensia G. Petronio spd;
      > > you are very astute. As so far there is a lot of argument against you but no answer yet to your question.
      > >
      > > Now as for me, I chose to revive gens Hortensia for this remarkable woman who protested the Oppian law. I made sure though, that I was not Quinta Hortensia, after the historical Q. Hortensius Hortalus, as indeed this would be roleplaying, having the exact name of a historical person.
      > >
      > > Who we regard and why when we take a name is indeed significant.
      > > For those who don't know about this great Hortensia please read here:
      > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hortensia_(orator)
      > > able oratrix, univir, Illustra Hortensia
      > > optime valete
      > > Marca Hortensia Maior
      > >
      > > > It would be a very ridiculous case. A law against a question? Where are you living?
      > > >
      > > > Do not worry, Socrates also, relatively speaking, had many ridiculous questions. But as he knew the main thing are the answers.
      > > >
      > > > But, unlike him, I shall not drink the hemlock.:o)
      > > >
      > > > Vale.
      > > > C. Petronius Dexter
      > > >
      > >
      >