--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Publius Memmius Albucius" <albucius_aoe@...> wrote:
>
> Catoni sen. omnibusque s.d.
>
> Sorry for the silence. Normally the praetura is closed today: this is a "nefastus publicus" day, for everybody (see our calendar pls).
>
> I will be at your disposal tomorrow.
>
> Have a good day, and you all.
>
> Vale,
>
>
> P. Memmius Albucius
> praetor
>
>
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Gaius Equitius Cato" <mlcinnyc@> wrote:
> >
> > Cato omnibus in foro SPD
> >
> > Salvete.
> >
> > If the post I directed at the praetor Albucius is not returned to this list within the next 30 minutes, I will begin proceedings to have officers of this corporation removed in accordance with the governing act of this corporation.
> >
> > If I am not removed from moderation in accordance with the Constitution of the res publica within the next 10 minutes, I will begin proceedings to have officers of this corporation removed in accordance with the governing act of this corporation.
> >
> > Valete,
> >
> > Cato
> >
>

> Catoni sen. omnibusque s.d.
>
> Sorry for the silence. Normally the praetura is closed today: this is a "nefastus publicus" day, for everybody (see our calendar pls).
>
> I will be at your disposal tomorrow.
>
> Have a good day, and you all.
>
> Vale,
>
>
> P. Memmius Albucius
> praetor
>
>
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Gaius Equitius Cato" <mlcinnyc@...> wrote:
>
>> Cato omnibus in foro SPD
>>
>> Salvete.
>>
>> If the post I directed at the praetor Albucius is not returned to this list within the next 30 minutes, I will begin proceedings to have officers of this corporation removed in accordance with the governing act of this corporation.
>>
>> If I am not removed from moderation in accordance with the Constitution of the res publica within the next 10 minutes, I will begin proceedings to have officers of this corporation removed in accordance with the governing act of this corporation.
>>
>> Valete,
>>
>> Cato
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>

On Apr 18, 2009, at 1:54 PM, Robert Woolwine wrote:
> Where is Iunia to speak for herself? I want to her her go on the
> record?
>
> Vale,
>
> Sulla
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Maior" <rory12001@...> wrote:
> >
> > M. Hortensia Quiritibus spd
> > I've spoken with our Cheif Financial Officer Equestria Laeca, who
> > is a professional financial analyst and accountant.
> >
> > She told me that last year 2008, to get Nova Roma's affairs in
> order she
> > spoke with all the necessary state and federal agencies that
> govern non-profits to ensure that
> > EVERY single filing of Nova Roma was proper, what liablitity there
> might be from from previous years and also
> > to determine what we need to file in the future when we grow.
> >
> > Equestria devoted hours of her free time to ensure Nova Roma's
> > upstanding status as a non-profit. Feel free to ask her if this is
> so. I certainly did.
> >
> > She told me Gn. Iulius Caesar, Sulla, nor Cato never contacted her.
> >
> >
> > So Quirites, this 'uproar' is manufactured, Nova Roma is totally
> compliant with all state and federal laws that govern non-profits.
> >
> > I am sorry such aggravation was caused when a simple letter to
> Equestria would have answered all questions.
> >
> > I am thankful that last years consuls M. Moravius Piscinus and
> Iulius Sabinus, secured such an excellent ethical person Equestria
> Laeca to protect Nova Roma and the monies of its citizens.
> > bene valete in pacem deorum
> > M. Hortensia Maior

On Apr 18, 2009, at 3:35 PM, Gaius Equitius Cato wrote:
> Cato Maiori sal.
>
> Salve!
>
> More ouright lies, Maior. You know, if you lie it doesn't make the
> Bad Thing go away.
>
> I and Caesar and Sulla and Paulinus and I forget who else have been
> in contact via private email, contact which is ongoing as we speak.
>
> Equestria Laeca is a financial analyst, not an accountant. You will
> no doubt attempt to turn this into an attack on her, but you can
> take that out of your little mind right now.
>
> Nova Roma is *not* in compliance with the law.
>
> Frankly, you are a serious danger legally to the res publica right
> now, as was made abundantly clear yesterday with your manic babbling
> about ancient Roman law and our "right" to violate the law as we saw
> fit.
>
> You are quick to boast, eager to demand everyone's qualifications to
> take a poop, and yet refuse to provide your own credentials. How's
> about it? Where's your law degree from? When did you pass the bar?
> Where are you currently practicing and what type of law is it?
>
> And even if - by some delightfully perverse sense of reality's humor
> - you actually *are* in possession of a degree in law, you *still*
> have no clue what you are talking about.
>
> Vale,
>
> Cato
>

----- Original Message -----
From: "Gaius Popillius" <gaiuspopillius@...>
To: "SenatusRomanus@yahoogroups. com" <SenatusRomanus@yahoogroups.com>;
<Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Sunday, April 19, 2009 3:43 AM
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Resignation


> Salvete Senatores et Quirites,
> I hereby resign my positions as Senator, Censor, and Lictor in Nova Roma.
> I also resign from the Board of Directors and as Board Secretary of Nova
> Roma, Inc.
> I resign my citizenship in Nova Roma and that of my minor daughter,
> Alexandra Popillia.
> Valete,
> Gaius Popillius Laenas / Keith Sterne

On 4/19/09, Gaius Popillius <gaiuspopillius@...> wrote:

Salvete Senatores et Quirites,

 

I hereby resign my positions as Senator, Censor, and Lictor in Nova Roma.

This is really, really sad. Why do all the good people leave. Leanas will be much missed.

Flavia Lucilla Merula

On Apr 18, 2009, at 3:35 PM, Gaius Equitius Cato wrote:
> Nova Roma is *not* in compliance with the law.
>

Enough with these alarming statements! What are you even talking
about?? All companies have minor legal issues with wording and other
legalities. This is why corporate attorneys and compliance officers
exist! And compliance audits! They happen every single day and I
have conducted MANY of them. It is called the real world.

We ARE in compliance with the law!! Nova Roma is financially and
legally in EXCELLENT health!!!

Stop these games NOW!!

On Apr 18, 2009, at 3:35 PM, Gaius Equitius Cato wrote:
> Equestria Laeca is a financial analyst, not an accountant. You will
> no doubt attempt to turn this into an attack on her, but you can
> take that out of your little mind right now.
>
> Nova Roma is *not* in compliance with the law.
>
> Frankly, you are a serious danger legally to the res publica right
> now, as was made abundantly clear yesterday with your manic babbling
> about ancient Roman law and our "right" to violate the law as we saw
> fit.

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "D. Boyle" <deandreaboyle@...> wrote:
>
> Equestria Catoni sal.
>
> On Apr 18, 2009, at 3:35 PM, Gaius Equitius Cato wrote:
> > Nova Roma is *not* in compliance with the law.
> >
>
> Enough with these alarming statements! What are you even talking
> about?? All companies have minor legal issues with wording and other
> legalities. This is why corporate attorneys and compliance officers
> exist! And compliance audits! They happen every single day and I
> have conducted MANY of them. It is called the real world.
>
> We ARE in compliance with the law!! Nova Roma is financially and
> legally in EXCELLENT health!!!
>
> Stop these games NOW!!
>

Salvete

FYI

As of today  we have 106 Nova Roman taxpayers. This is less than half of what we usually have. 

There are sill 11 days left before the deadline to pay, on time, for this year.

Valete

> I care, and I also could cry seeing Laenas as he leaves Nova Roma. He was a friend.
>
> This is the saddest thing in this year so far in Nova Roma.

>
> This is because of people who think politics, laws and arguments are more important than the spirit: the friendships, the individual souls.
>
> This is what anybody wanted?
>
> Angry people! Do you want to kill Nova Roma?
>
> What do you love *more*? Your anger or your republic? The legal nuances or the people for whom the laws exist?
>
>
> I BEG you guys both as a Pontiff of Nova Roma and as Priest of Concord:
> stop this right now. This is the limit, the moral limit where somebody
> is still a Nova Roman and a Fellow Citizen, but if takes one more step,
> ceases to be an honorable man for our Roman community.
>
> We all are here because we love Rome, the Roman values and the idea of a New Rome. We are a community of people from all over the world who wants the same thing: a "New Rome", a "new renaissance" - of classical values, arts, philosophy, culture and religion.
>
> But now, some ignore our wonderful common dream and focus on what divides us instead of focusing on what unites us into a Spiritual Nation. They do this, and they kill Nova Roma.
>
> This is the time for a dictator. A balanced, peaceful person a hard working citizen whom all trust. A consular who will create peace for Nova Roma.
>
> We have some who could do this job and whom I would support.
>
> CITIZENS!
>
> SAVE NOVA ROMA!
>
> CONCORDIA!
>
> SAVE NOVA ROMA!
>
>
> Cn. Cornelius Lentulus
> Pontifex
> Sacerdos Concordiae
>
>
> --- Dom 19/4/09, Diana Octavia Aventina <roman.babe@...> ha scritto:
> Da: Diana Octavia Aventina <roman.babe@...>
> Oggetto: Re: [Nova-Roma] Resignation
> A: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> Data: Domenica 19 Aprile 2009, 12:00
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> I could really cry.
>
>
>
> Laenas is a great person and quite an even tempered guy. Once again all of
>
> the arguing has driven a good person away. We lost a good one today people.
>
> And as usual, I don't really think too many people care.
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
>
> From: "Gaius Popillius" <gaiuspopillius@ gmail.com>
>
> To: "SenatusRomanus@ yahoogroups. com" <SenatusRomanus@ yahoogroups. com>;
>
> <Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com>
>
> Sent: Sunday, April 19, 2009 3:43 AM
>
> Subject: [Nova-Roma] Resignation
>
>
>
>> Salvete Senatores et Quirites,
>
>> I hereby resign my positions as Senator, Censor, and Lictor in Nova Roma.
>
>> I also resign from the Board of Directors and as Board Secretary of Nova
>
>> Roma, Inc.
>
>> I resign my citizenship in Nova Roma and that of my minor daughter,
>
>> Alexandra Popillia.
>
>> Valete,
>
>> Gaius Popillius Laenas / Keith Sterne
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

> Every citizen owes Eq. Iunia Laeca a debt of gratitude for all of the hard work
> that she has contributed starting with last year.

On Sun, Apr 19, 2009 at 3:02 AM, Gaius Equitius Cato wrote:
>
>
> Cato omnibus in foro SPD
>
> Salvete!
>
> To all of our citizens who celebrate this day as the Feast of The
> Resurrection of Christ, I wish you all the joy of this most holy day.
>
> Valete,
>
> Cato
>

Holy Days should be acknowledged and appreciated in the light of Nova
Roma's modern look at Ancient sensibilities.

Blessings of the Day to all who hold it Holy.

bene

Venii

----- Original Message -----
THE XXth FLORALIA CARNIVAL IN AQUINCUM (Hungary)

We received good credits so that this year Nova Roma has got a request from
the Museum of Aquincum to take part in organizing the 20th Floralia
Carnival, on 23-24th May.

PROGRAMS (MAY 23-24th, Budapest)

>
> Salvete omnes
>
> I have received a request for and hearby grant intercessio against the
> moderation of Quintus Valerius Poplicola. The right to free speech is the
> hallmark of a free republic.
>
> If anyone else has been placed on moderation, please contact the Tribunes.
>
> I also call on the praetors to explain this assault on the rights of the
> people.
>
> Gaius Vipsanius Agrippa
> Tribune of the Plebs
>
>

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Cn. Cornelius Lentulus" <cn_corn_lent@...> wrote:
>
> Salvete omnes!
>
>
> I care, and I also could cry seeing Laenas as he leaves Nova Roma. He was a friend.
>
> This is the saddest thing in this year so far in Nova Roma.
>
> This is because of people who think politics, laws and arguments are more important than the spirit: the friendships, the individual souls.
>
> This is what anybody wanted?
>
> Angry people! Do you want to kill Nova Roma?
>
> What do you love *more*? Your anger or your republic? The legal nuances or the people for whom the laws exist?
>
>
> I BEG you guys both as a Pontiff of Nova Roma and as Priest of Concord:
> stop this right now. This is the limit, the moral limit where somebody
> is still a Nova Roman and a Fellow Citizen, but if takes one more step,
> ceases to be an honorable man for our Roman community.
>
> We all are here because we love Rome, the Roman values and the idea of a New Rome. We are a community of people from all over the world who wants the same thing: a "New Rome", a "new renaissance" - of classical values, arts, philosophy, culture and religion.
>
> But now, some ignore our wonderful common dream and focus on what divides us instead of focusing on what unites us into a Spiritual Nation. They do this, and they kill Nova Roma.
>
> This is the time for a dictator. A balanced, peaceful person a hard working citizen whom all trust. A consular who will create peace for Nova Roma.
>
> We have some who could do this job and whom I would support.
>
> CITIZENS!
>
> SAVE NOVA ROMA!
>
> CONCORDIA!
>
> SAVE NOVA ROMA!
>
>
> Cn. Cornelius Lentulus
> Pontifex
> Sacerdos Concordiae
>
>
> --- Dom 19/4/09, Diana Octavia Aventina <roman.babe@...> ha scritto:
> Da: Diana Octavia Aventina <roman.babe@...>
> Oggetto: Re: [Nova-Roma] Resignation
> A: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> Data: Domenica 19 Aprile 2009, 12:00
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> I could really cry.
>
>
>
> Laenas is a great person and quite an even tempered guy. Once again all of
>
> the arguing has driven a good person away. We lost a good one today people.
>
> And as usual, I don't really think too many people care.
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
>
> From: "Gaius Popillius" <gaiuspopillius@ gmail.com>
>
> To: "SenatusRomanus@ yahoogroups. com" <SenatusRomanus@ yahoogroups. com>;
>
> <Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com>
>
> Sent: Sunday, April 19, 2009 3:43 AM
>
> Subject: [Nova-Roma] Resignation
>
>
>
> > Salvete Senatores et Quirites,
>
> > I hereby resign my positions as Senator, Censor, and Lictor in Nova Roma.
>
> > I also resign from the Board of Directors and as Board Secretary of Nova
>
> > Roma, Inc.
>
> > I resign my citizenship in Nova Roma and that of my minor daughter,
>
> > Alexandra Popillia.
>
> > Valete,
>
> > Gaius Popillius Laenas / Keith Sterne
>

On Sun, Apr 19, 2009 at 5:35 AM, Cn. Cornelius Lentulus wrote:
>
>[excision]
>
> This is the time for a dictator.
>
> [excision]

I find that a discordant note just now.

vale - Venator

>>> I find that a discordant note just now. <<<

>
> Lentulus Venatori s. p. d.
>
>
>>>> I find that a discordant note just now. <<<
>
>
> If this is so, I'm sorry. I wished to emphasize concordance.
>
> I should note, however, that a dictator is not a bad word for a Roman,
> unlike it is in modern context. A Roman dictator is part of the system,
> and almost each second year saw a dictator in the early republic, who
> fixed the things, placated the conflicts and saved the state from a
> danger.
>
> A dictator is the Roman solution when the collegial magistrates aren't
> effective enough to solve a problem. To be honest, I would love to see
> such a wise and balanced person like you as dictator of Nova Roma.
>
> I know everyone would trust in such a dictator.
>
>
>
>
>
>

On Sun, Apr 19, 2009 at 12:59 PM, Cn. Cornelius Lentulus wrote:
>
> Lentulus Venatori s. p. d.
>
>>>> I find that a discordant note just now. <<<
>
> If this is so, I'm sorry. I wished to emphasize concordance.
>
> I should note, however, that a dictator is not a bad word for a Roman,
> unlike it is in modern context. A Roman dictator is part of the system, and
> almost each second year saw a dictator in the early republic, who fixed the
> things, placated the conflicts and saved the state from a danger.
>
> A dictator is the Roman solution when the collegial magistrates aren't
> effective enough to solve a problem. To be honest, I would love to see such
> a wise and balanced person like you as dictator of Nova Roma.
>
> I know everyone would trust in such a dictator.
>

I am well aware of just what a Dictator means in our Roman sense,
having been here during the previous use of this extreme measure.

My only choices are likely unacceptable, if such a measure were to be
enacted; invite either Cassius or Vedius back.

vale - Venator

On Sun, Apr 19, 2009 at 1:47 PM, P Ullerius Stephanus Venator wrote:
> Decemvirate?
>

Like the one of 451 BC, not its successor.

Even using his model as a solution, I would want our Paters Patria
involved, as well as others from the founding days who still have an
interest.

=====================================
In amicitia et fide
P Ullerius Stephanus Venator
Civis circa Quintilis MMDCCLI a.u.c.

--- On Sun, 4/19/09, Gaius Vipsanius Agrippa <canadaoccidentalis@...> wrote:

> From: Gaius Vipsanius Agrippa <canadaoccidentalis@...>
> Subject: [Nova-Roma] Censorship
> To: "Nova Roma" <nova-roma@yahoogroups.com>
> Date: Sunday, April 19, 2009, 11:36 AM
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Salvete omnes
>
>
>
> It now appears that the praetors are moderating the posts
> of two additional Senators. They have also deleted a
> posting made by Senator Equitius Cato. I pronounce
> intercessio against these actions and again call on the
> praetors to explain their assault on the rights of free
> citizens.
>
>
>
> Sic semper tyrannus
>
>
>
> Gaius Vipsanius Agrippa
>
> Tribune of the Plebs
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

> I have receive a request for and hearby grant intercessio against the moderation of Senator Lucius Cornelius Sulla Felix.

> [...] Cornelius Sulla Felix is no threat to Nova Roma.

--- On Sun, 4/19/09, Lucius Cornelius Cicero <Cicero@...> wrote:

> From: Lucius Cornelius Cicero <Cicero@...>
> Subject: Censored Post
> To: "Gaius Vipsanius Agrippa" <canadaoccidentalis@...>
> Received: Sunday, April 19, 2009, 1:59 PM
> Dear Tribune Agrippa
>
> I made a post to the ML yesterday that never appeared. The
> text of the message was: "Congratulations, Maior and
> co. Another casualty in your efforts to destroy NR."
>
> Today I received the below message from a Praetor.
>
> I am apparently no longer under moderation but I wanted to
> let you know about my post that was prevented from
> appearing.
>
> Vale,
>
> Lucius Cornelius Cicero
>
>
>
>
> >Salve, Cicero!
>
> >Your post is rejected because it contains factual error
> that would >harm citizen M. Hortensia Maior's name
> and also would cause even >more fervent debate and hatred
> based on this factual misstatement of >yours.
>
> >I confirm you that Censor Laenas' resignation was
> not because of >"Maior and co." but because of
> "Sulla and co." as he himself >explained it -
> I'm sure you're innocent but there are manipulative
> >citizens who may use Laenas' resignation as a tool.
>
> >You are off moderation, so you can voice your opinion
> in a new post >anytime: just please try to adhere to
> facts instead of misinformed >accusation.
>
> >Vale optime!
> >Lentulus, scribe
>
>
>
>
> > Congratulations, Maior and co. Another casualty in
> your efforts to destroy NR.
> >
> > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Gaius Popillius
> <gaiuspopillius@...> wrote:
> > >
> > > Salvete Senatores et Quirites,
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > I hereby resign my positions as Senator, Censor,
> and Lictor in Nova Roma.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > I also resign from the Board of Directors and as
> Board Secretary of Nova
> > > Roma, Inc.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > I resign my citizenship in Nova Roma and that of
> my minor daughter,
> > > Alexandra Popillia.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Valete,
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Gaius Popillius Laenas / Keith Sterne
> > >

>
>
>
> Salvete omne
>
> --- On Sun, 4/19/09, Lucius Cornelius Cicero <Cicero@...> wrote:
>
>> From: Lucius Cornelius Cicero <Cicero@...>
>> Subject: Censored Post
>> To: "Gaius Vipsanius Agrippa" <canadaoccidentalis@...>
>> Received: Sunday, April 19, 2009, 1:59 PM
>> Dear Tribune Agrippa
>>
>> I made a post to the ML yesterday that never appeared. The
>> text of the message was: "Congratulations, Maior and
>> co. Another casualty in your efforts to destroy NR."
>>
>> Today I received the below message from a Praetor.
>>
>> I am apparently no longer under moderation but I wanted to
>> let you know about my post that was prevented from
>> appearing.
>>
>> Vale,
>>
>> Lucius Cornelius Cicero
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> >Salve, Cicero!
>>
>> >Your post is rejected because it contains factual error
>> that would >harm citizen M. Hortensia Maior's name
>> and also would cause even >more fervent debate and hatred
>> based on this factual misstatement of >yours.
>>
>> >I confirm you that Censor Laenas' resignation was
>> not because of >"Maior and co." but because of
>> "Sulla and co." as he himself >explained it -
>> I'm sure you're innocent but there are manipulative
>> >citizens who may use Laenas' resignation as a tool.
>>
>> >You are off moderation, so you can voice your opinion
>> in a new post >anytime: just please try to adhere to
>> facts instead of misinformed >accusation.
>>
>> >Vale optime!
>> >Lentulus, scribe
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> > Congratulations, Maior and co. Another casualty in
>> your efforts to destroy NR.
>> >
>> > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Gaius Popillius
>> <gaiuspopillius@...> wrote:
>> > >
>> > > Salvete Senatores et Quirites,
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > I hereby resign my positions as Senator, Censor,
>> and Lictor in Nova Roma.
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > I also resign from the Board of Directors and as
>> Board Secretary of Nova
>> > > Roma, Inc.
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > I resign my citizenship in Nova Roma and that of
>> my minor daughter,
>> > > Alexandra Popillia.
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > Valete,
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > Gaius Popillius Laenas / Keith Sterne
>> > >
>
>

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Gaius Vipsanius Agrippa <canadaoccidentalis@...> wrote:
>
>
> Salvete omne
>
>
> --- On Sun, 4/19/09, Lucius Cornelius Cicero <Cicero@...> wrote:
>
> > From: Lucius Cornelius Cicero <Cicero@...>
> > Subject: Censored Post
> > To: "Gaius Vipsanius Agrippa" <canadaoccidentalis@...>
> > Received: Sunday, April 19, 2009, 1:59 PM
> > Dear Tribune Agrippa
> >
> > I made a post to the ML yesterday that never appeared. The
> > text of the message was: "Congratulations, Maior and
> > co. Another casualty in your efforts to destroy NR."
> >
> > Today I received the below message from a Praetor.
> >
> > I am apparently no longer under moderation but I wanted to
> > let you know about my post that was prevented from
> > appearing.
> >
> > Vale,
> >
> > Lucius Cornelius Cicero
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > >Salve, Cicero!
> >
> > >Your post is rejected because it contains factual error
> > that would >harm citizen M. Hortensia Maior's name
> > and also would cause even >more fervent debate and hatred
> > based on this factual misstatement of >yours.
> >
> > >I confirm you that Censor Laenas' resignation was
> > not because of >"Maior and co." but because of
> > "Sulla and co." as he himself >explained it -
> > I'm sure you're innocent but there are manipulative
> > >citizens who may use Laenas' resignation as a tool.
> >
> > >You are off moderation, so you can voice your opinion
> > in a new post >anytime: just please try to adhere to
> > facts instead of misinformed >accusation.
> >
> > >Vale optime!
> > >Lentulus, scribe
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > > Congratulations, Maior and co. Another casualty in
> > your efforts to destroy NR.
> > >
> > > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Gaius Popillius
> > <gaiuspopillius@> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Salvete Senatores et Quirites,
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > I hereby resign my positions as Senator, Censor,
> > and Lictor in Nova Roma.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > I also resign from the Board of Directors and as
> > Board Secretary of Nova
> > > > Roma, Inc.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > I resign my citizenship in Nova Roma and that of
> > my minor daughter,
> > > > Alexandra Popillia.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Valete,
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Gaius Popillius Laenas / Keith Sterne
> > > >
>

> Notice Pius' response to the tribune about Sulla being an enemy of the republic, which was, at the very least, inflammatory.
>

> The moderation of citzens beyond a reasonable time frame for new citizens violates the Constitution, specifically Section II B 4
>
> "[...] *Such officially sponsored fora may be expected to be reasonably moderated in the interests of maintaining order and civility*"
>

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Kristoffer From <from@...> wrote:
>
> gualterus_graecus wrote:
> > Notice Pius' response to the tribune about Sulla being an enemy of the republic, which was, at the very least, inflammatory.
> >
>
> Salve, Gualtere.
>
> Hardly - Sulla threatens with lawsuits on an almost continual basis. This is a fact and makes him a very real threat to the res publica. Pointing out FACTUAL truth, as opposed to the highly subjective "personal" truth of some, Cato for instance, is not inflammatory speech.
>
> Cato whom, by the way, is currently threatening with using US laws against the res publica, in this very thread. Which makes him a threat in the same category as Sulla. Use our internal systems or be acknowledged as the traitors of the res publica and dangers to it that you are.
>
> As to why my post was let through, I have been a member on this list since it was created. I am not moderated until my posts make me so.
>
> Vale, Pius.
>

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Kristoffer From <from@...> wrote:
>
> gualterus_graecus wrote:
> > Notice Pius' response to the tribune about Sulla being an enemy of the republic, which was, at the very least, inflammatory.
> >
>
> Salve, Gualtere.
>
> Hardly - Sulla threatens with lawsuits on an almost continual basis. This is a fact and makes him a very real threat to the res publica. Pointing out FACTUAL truth, as opposed to the highly subjective "personal" truth of some, Cato for instance, is not inflammatory speech.
>
> Cato whom, by the way, is currently threatening with using US laws against the res publica, in this very thread. Which makes him a threat in the same category as Sulla. Use our internal systems or be acknowledged as the traitors of the res publica and dangers to it that you are.
>
> As to why my post was let through, I have been a member on this list since it was created. I am not moderated until my posts make me so.
>
> Vale, Pius.
>

P. MEMMIUS ALBUCIUS praetor edict PR 62-03 concerning the application of lex Salicia iudicaria (de lege agenda Salicia iudicaria)

I, Publius Memmius Albucius, praetor, by the authority vested by the constitution, the laws and
the Senate of Nova Roma, and in view of the existing rules ;

In view of :

• the Constitution of Nova Roma, especially its article IV, A.3;

• the laws of Nova Roma, especially lex Arminia Equitia de imperio and lex Salicia iudicaria, and especially of its pars secunda, VI, B, which provides that “Iurisprudentia: in those cases where the laws do not present an explicit treatment of a certain situation, a praetor shall create iurisprudentia (jurisprudence) applicable to all similar situations. Iurisprudentia is an expression of the imperium of the praetor, and it has the same legislative power as a praetorial edictum. Because of this, laws approved by the Comitia shall always supersede iurisprudentia, and a certain praetor can alter previous iurisprudentia through an official edictum whenever common sense dictates that such a course of action is necessary.” ;

•  

Considering that the Roman magistrates are allowed the ius edicendi on dies nefasti;

Considering that the imperative necessity to guarantee every citizen of Nova Roma, whatever their status, order or qualities, an equal and transparent access to Novaroman justice;

edict :

Article 1

The previous iurisprudentiae which may having been created or developed by former praetors of Nova Roma are replaced, as whole body of rules, by the rules defined by the present edictum or by the rules that Praetor Memmius may issue in the frame of a judicial action led in year 2762 a.u.c..

Article 2

In case of the silence or lack of precision of Nova Roma penal laws, Pr. Memmius will, in the frame of his imperium, apply, in the interpretation and implementation of the Nova Roma legal system, the:

- mos maiorum, including custom laws and roman virtues

- general principles of law ('GPL') and the general principles of proceeding law, as currently shared by the States members of the United Nations and taught in Law schools, as common rules derived from the Ancient Roman law;

- ancient Roman republican laws as well as ancient proceedings or custom rules.

No hierarchy will, ab initio and a priori, be set between these rules, that Pr. Memmius will use according the cases and the GPL of “useful effect”, which consists in using the most appropriate rules in order to issue the most appropriate conclusion through the most appropriate reasoning.

Article 3

The legal questions escaping the scope of the article 2 above will be treated in the frame of the hierarchy of legal norms which currently rules Nova Roma legal system, and which defined in the paragraph I, B of the Constitution.

Article 4

In the case of the admissibility of a petitio actionis according Nova Roma penal laws, Memmius praetorian edicts will specify, as much as necessary and in the frame of the lines defined in the article 2 above, the rules which will apply to the proceedings of the trial, from the notification of the admissible petitio to the enforcement of the sententia, included the case of proceedings in absentia.

Article 5

Every novaroman public officer must, as far as they are concerned, enforce the present edict, which will be published in the Tabularium Novae Romae and in Nova Roma relevant internet discussion lists.

Issued in Condate, Gallia, a.d. XII Kal. Maias MMDCCLXII a.u.c. (20th January 2009 c.c.) during the consulate of M. Curiatius Complutensis and M. Iulius Severus.

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Lucius Coruncanius Cato <l.coruncanius_cato@...> wrote:
>
> Lucius Coruncanius Cato omn. SPD.
>
> I, Lucius Coruncanius Cato, ask all five Tribunis Plebis not to take this proposal and veto it. This proposal by Sen. Equitius Cato (who does not explain why he charges the magistrates neither what are the charges) is nothing more than an intent to blackmail the Consuls, the Praetores, the Tribunis Plebis and the cives of Nova Roma.
>
> --
>
> Di te incolumem custodiant.
>
> Lucius Coruncanius Cato
>
> Candidate to Aedilis Curulis

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Kristoffer From <from@...> wrote:
>
> Gaius Vipsanius Agrippa wrote:
> > The moderation of citzens beyond a reasonable time frame for new citizens violates the Constitution, specifically Section II B 4
> >
> > "[...] *Such officially sponsored fora may be expected to be reasonably moderated in the interests of maintaining order and civility*"
> >
>
> Salve, Gaius Vipsanius Agrippa
>
> Your idiotic intercessio doesn't hold water. The paragraph of the
> constitution you quoted mandates moderation - and you cannot pronounce
> intercessio against the constitution.
>
> Your intercessio is illegal and hence invalid. Please refrain from
> further embarrassing yourself and the office of tribune.
>
> Vale, Pius.
>

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Kristoffer From <from@...> wrote:
>
> Gaius Vipsanius Agrippa wrote:
> > The moderation of citzens beyond a reasonable time frame for new citizens violates the Constitution, specifically Section II B 4
> >
> > "[...] *Such officially sponsored fora may be expected to be reasonably moderated in the interests of maintaining order and civility*"
> >
>
> Salve, Gaius Vipsanius Agrippa
>
> Your idiotic intercessio doesn't hold water. The paragraph of the
> constitution you quoted mandates moderation - and you cannot pronounce
> intercessio against the constitution.
>
> Your intercessio is illegal and hence invalid. Please refrain from
> further embarrassing yourself and the office of tribune.
>
> Vale, Pius.
>

--- On Sun, 4/19/09, Yahoo! Groups <notify@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

> From: Yahoo! Groups <notify@yahoogroups.com>
> Subject: Unable to deliver your message
> To: galerius_of_rome@...
> Date: Sunday, April 19, 2009, 6:34 PM
> We are unable to deliver the message from
> <galerius_of_rome@...>
> to <nove-roma@yahoogroups.com>.
>
> Your message was sent to a group that does not exist.
> Please check
> to make sure you spelled the group name correctly.
>
> For further assistance, please visit
> http://help.yahoo.com/l/us/yahoo/groups/original/members/web/index.html

> [...] [Lots of stuff] [...]

> gualterus_graecus wrote:
>> Notice Pius' response to the tribune about Sulla being an enemy of the
>> republic, which was, at the very least, inflammatory.
>>
>
> Salve, Gualtere.
>
> Hardly - Sulla threatens with lawsuits on an almost continual basis. This
> is a fact and makes him a very real threat to the res publica. Pointing
> out FACTUAL truth, as opposed to the highly subjective "personal" truth of
> some, Cato for instance, is not inflammatory speech.
>
> Cato whom, by the way, is currently threatening with using US laws against
> the res publica, in this very thread. Which makes him a threat in the same
> category as Sulla. Use our internal systems or be acknowledged as the
> traitors of the res publica and dangers to it that you are.
>
> As to why my post was let through, I have been a member on this list since
> it was created. I am not moderated until my posts make me so.
>
> Vale, Pius.
>
>
>

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Lucius Coruncanius Cato <l.coruncanius_cato@...> wrote:
>
> Lucius Coruncanius Cato omn. SPD.
>
> It is not "choice". It is an utter blackmail:
> "
> If I hear nothing from you, I will begin the legal process of forcing a vote."
>
> 1st. You are asking the Tribunis Plebis to gather the people to vote.
> 2nd. If they don't, you will force it.
>
> This is blackmail, anywhere you go, anyone you ask.
>
> --
>
> Di te incolumem custodiant.
>
> L. Coruncanius Cato
>
> Candidate to Aedilis Curulis