Selected messages in Nova-Roma group. May 22-25, 2009

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65835 From: Charlie Collins Date: 2009-05-22
Subject: History of Rome Podcast
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65836 From: Q. Valerius Poplicola Date: 2009-05-22
Subject: Re: Candidacy - Opinion of Fl. Galerius Aurelianus Tribunus Plebis
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65837 From: Jesse Corradino Date: 2009-05-22
Subject: Re: Sulla's rebuttal - Re: Nova-Roma is my life (Was:The Cancer of N
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65838 From: C. Maria Caeca Date: 2009-05-22
Subject: procedural question
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65839 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2009-05-23
Subject: Sulla's Teaching Skills
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65840 From: Timothy or Stephen Gallagher Date: 2009-05-23
Subject: Re: procedural question
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65841 From: C. Maria Caeca Date: 2009-05-23
Subject: Re: procedural question
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65842 From: Timothy or Stephen Gallagher Date: 2009-05-23
Subject: Re: procedural question
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65843 From: Q. Valerius Poplicola Date: 2009-05-23
Subject: Sulla's rebuttal - Re: Nova-Roma is my life (Was:The Cancer of Nova
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65844 From: Q. Valerius Poplicola Date: 2009-05-23
Subject: Re: [BackAlley] Re: (unknown)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65845 From: D. Boyle Date: 2009-05-23
Subject: Re: 3 Reasons to Not Vote
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65846 From: marcushoratius Date: 2009-05-23
Subject: a. d. X Kalendas Iunias: TUBILUSTRIUM; Volcanus; dies Rosarium
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65847 From: D. Boyle Date: 2009-05-23
Subject: Re: Sulla's Teaching Skills
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65848 From: Robert Levee Date: 2009-05-23
Subject: Re: 3 Reasons to Not Vote
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65849 From: David Kling Date: 2009-05-23
Subject: Re: Sulla's rebuttal - Re: Nova-Roma is my life (Was:The Cancer of N
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65850 From: David Kling Date: 2009-05-23
Subject: Re: [BackAlley] Re: (unknown)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65851 From: deciusiunius Date: 2009-05-23
Subject: Re: Re Modianus: a candidacy of certain legality.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65852 From: Publius Ullerius Stephanus Venator Date: 2009-05-23
Subject: Nova Roman Statesmen, was Re: Candidacy - Opinion of . . .
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65853 From: deciusiunius Date: 2009-05-23
Subject: Re: Candidacy!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65854 From: deciusiunius Date: 2009-05-23
Subject: Re: Candidacy - Opinion of Fl. Galerius Aurelianus Tribunus Plebis
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65855 From: politicog Date: 2009-05-23
Subject: Re: Candidacy - Opinion of Fl. Galerius Aurelianus Tribunus Plebis
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65856 From: Jesse Corradino Date: 2009-05-23
Subject: Re: Sulla's rebuttal - Re: Nova-Roma is my life (Was:The Cancer of
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65857 From: Roger Date: 2009-05-23
Subject: Open Letter to the Praetors: Possible Solution for Election Mess
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65858 From: David Kling Date: 2009-05-23
Subject: Re: Open Letter to the Praetors: Possible Solution for Election Mess
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65859 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2009-05-23
Subject: Re: Candidacy - Opinion of Fl. Galerius Aurelianus Tribunus Plebis
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65860 From: D. Boyle Date: 2009-05-23
Subject: Re: Open Letter to the Praetors: NO Election Mess
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65861 From: L Julia Aquila Date: 2009-05-23
Subject: Re: Candidacy!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65862 From: Titus Flavius Aquila Date: 2009-05-23
Subject: Both candidates for Censor Suffectus are valid candidates (AW: [Nova
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65864 From: Roger Date: 2009-05-23
Subject: Re: Open Letter to the Praetors: NO Election Mess
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65865 From: L Julia Aquila Date: 2009-05-23
Subject: Re: Classic Poetry, Prose, Proems
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65866 From: David Kling Date: 2009-05-23
Subject: Re: Open Letter to the Praetors: NO Election Mess
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65867 From: D. Boyle Date: 2009-05-23
Subject: Re: Open Letter to the Praetors: NO Election Mess
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65868 From: L Julia Aquila Date: 2009-05-23
Subject: Re: Sulla's Teaching Skills
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65869 From: Roger Date: 2009-05-23
Subject: Re: Open Letter to the Praetors: Possible Solution for Election Mess
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65870 From: David Kling Date: 2009-05-23
Subject: Re: Open Letter to the Praetors: Possible Solution for Election Mess
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65871 From: Steve Moore Date: 2009-05-23
Subject: Best Wishes to Members of the Armed Forces on the Tubilustrium
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65872 From: David Kling Date: 2009-05-23
Subject: Re: Best Wishes to Members of the Armed Forces on the Tubilustrium
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65873 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2009-05-23
Subject: Re: Sulla's Teaching Skills
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65874 From: Timothy or Stephen Gallagher Date: 2009-05-23
Subject: The Senate Session that Cato presided over as Praetor
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65875 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2009-05-23
Subject: Sulla's rebuttal - Re: Nova-Roma is my life (Was:The Cancer of Nova
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65876 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2009-05-23
Subject: Re: Sulla's Teaching Skills
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65877 From: Jennifer Harris Date: 2009-05-23
Subject: Re: Sulla's Teaching Skills
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65878 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2009-05-23
Subject: Tink's moderation
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65879 From: L Julia Aquila Date: 2009-05-23
Subject: Re: Classic Poetry, Prose, Proems
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65880 From: David Kling Date: 2009-05-23
Subject: Re: Tink's moderation
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65881 From: L Julia Aquila Date: 2009-05-23
Subject: Re: Tink's moderation
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65882 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2009-05-23
Subject: Re: Tink's moderation
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65883 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2009-05-23
Subject: Re: Tink's moderation
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65884 From: Jennifer Harris Date: 2009-05-23
Subject: Re: Tink's moderation
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65885 From: Matt Hucke Date: 2009-05-23
Subject: Re: Open Letter to the Praetors: Possible Solution for Election Mess
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65886 From: C. Maria Caeca Date: 2009-05-23
Subject: our untapped resource
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65887 From: L Julia Aquila Date: 2009-05-23
Subject: Re: R. Cornelia Aeternia aka Tink's moderation
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65888 From: Matt Hucke Date: 2009-05-23
Subject: Re: Sulla's Teaching Skills
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65889 From: L Julia Aquila Date: 2009-05-23
Subject: Re: our untapped resource
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65890 From: L Julia Aquila Date: 2009-05-23
Subject: Re: Classic Poetry, Prose, Proems
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65891 From: lathyrus77 Date: 2009-05-23
Subject: Re: our untapped resource
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65892 From: L Julia Aquila Date: 2009-05-23
Subject: Re: Sulla's Teaching Skills
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65893 From: L Julia Aquila Date: 2009-05-23
Subject: Re: our untapped resource
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65894 From: David Kling Date: 2009-05-23
Subject: Re: Tink's moderation
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65895 From: C. Maria Caeca Date: 2009-05-23
Subject: Re: our untapped resource
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65896 From: David Kling Date: 2009-05-23
Subject: Re: Sulla's Teaching Skills
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65897 From: L Julia Aquila Date: 2009-05-23
Subject: Re: our untapped resource
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65898 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2009-05-23
Subject: Re: Open Letter to the Praetors: NO Election Mess
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65899 From: Maior Date: 2009-05-23
Subject: Re: Open Letter to the Praetors: NO Election Mess
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65900 From: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com Date: 2009-05-23
Subject: Comitia Centuriata Election, 5/23/2009, 11:00 pm
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65901 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2009-05-23
Subject: Re: Open Letter to the Praetors: NO Election Mess
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65902 From: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com Date: 2009-05-23
Subject: Comitia Centuriata Election, 5/23/2009, 11:00 pm
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65903 From: Roger Date: 2009-05-23
Subject: Re: Open Letter to the Praetors: NO Election Mess
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65904 From: Publius Memmius Albucius Date: 2009-05-23
Subject: Re: Open Letter to the Praetors: Possible Solution for Election Mess
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65905 From: politicog Date: 2009-05-23
Subject: Re: Open Letter to the Praetors: Possible Solution for Election Mess
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65906 From: A. Sempronius Regulus Date: 2009-05-23
Subject: May and Mothers
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65907 From: Maior Date: 2009-05-23
Subject: Re: Open Letter to the Praetors: NO Election Mess
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65908 From: Terry Boyle Date: 2009-05-23
Subject: Re: Open Letter to the Praetors: NO Election Mess
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65909 From: Q. Valerius Poplicola Date: 2009-05-23
Subject: Re: Open Letter to the Praetors: Possible Solution for Election Mess
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65910 From: Timothy or Stephen Gallagher Date: 2009-05-23
Subject: Election Mess
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65911 From: Q. Valerius Poplicola Date: 2009-05-23
Subject: Re: Open Letter to the Praetors: NO Election Mess
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65912 From: Q. Valerius Poplicola Date: 2009-05-23
Subject: Consecutive Terms
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65913 From: Timothy or Stephen Gallagher Date: 2009-05-23
Subject: Election Mess
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65914 From: pompeia_minucia_tiberia Date: 2009-05-23
Subject: Test
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65915 From: Terry Boyle Date: 2009-05-23
Subject: Re: Election Mess
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65916 From: pompeia_minucia_tiberia Date: 2009-05-23
Subject: Consecutive Terms
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65917 From: deciusiunius Date: 2009-05-23
Subject: Re: Candidacy!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65918 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2009-05-23
Subject: Re: Open Letter to the Praetors: NO Election Mess
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65919 From: deciusiunius Date: 2009-05-23
Subject: Re: Consecutive Terms
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65920 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2009-05-23
Subject: Re: Consecutive Terms
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65921 From: pompeia_minucia_tiberia Date: 2009-05-24
Subject: Re: Consecutive Terms
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65922 From: Terry Boyle Date: 2009-05-24
Subject: Re: Consecutive Terms
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65923 From: pompeia_minucia_tiberia Date: 2009-05-24
Subject: Re: Consecutive Terms
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65924 From: QFabiusMaxmi@aol.com Date: 2009-05-24
Subject: Re: Both candidates for Censor Suffectus are valid candidates (AW: [
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65926 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2009-05-24
Subject: Re: Consecutive Terms
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65927 From: Gnaeus Iulius Caesar Date: 2009-05-24
Subject: Re: Consecutive Terms
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65928 From: pompeia_minucia_tiberia Date: 2009-05-24
Subject: Re: Consecutive Terms
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65929 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2009-05-24
Subject: Re: Candidacy!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65930 From: Jennifer Harris Date: 2009-05-24
Subject: Re: R. Cornelia Aeternia aka Tink's moderation
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65931 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2009-05-24
Subject: Re: Sulla's rebuttal - Re: Nova-Roma is my life (Was:The Cancer of
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65932 From: Jennifer Harris Date: 2009-05-24
Subject: Re: Tink's moderation
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65933 From: Christer Edling Date: 2009-05-24
Subject: Re: NR Floralia updates
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65934 From: Christer Edling Date: 2009-05-24
Subject: Some are trying to set up a one candidate race
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65935 From: Timothy or Stephen Gallagher Date: 2009-05-24
Subject: Re: Some are trying to set up a one candidate race NOT
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65936 From: marcushoratius Date: 2009-05-24
Subject: a. d. IX Kalendas Iunias: Q. R. C. F.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65937 From: David Kling Date: 2009-05-24
Subject: Re: Open Letter to the Praetors: Possible Solution for Election Mess
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65938 From: deciusiunius Date: 2009-05-24
Subject: Re: Consecutive Terms
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65939 From: David Kling Date: 2009-05-24
Subject: Re: Some are trying to set up a one candidate race
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65940 From: David Kling Date: 2009-05-24
Subject: Re: Some are trying to set up a one candidate race NOT
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65941 From: David Kling Date: 2009-05-24
Subject: Re: Consecutive Terms
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65942 From: L Julia Aquila Date: 2009-05-24
Subject: Re: R. Cornelia Aeternia aka Tink's moderation
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65943 From: Publius Ullerius Stephanus Venator Date: 2009-05-24
Subject: Latin Mass to Vernacular, was Re: Consecutive Terms
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65944 From: David Kling Date: 2009-05-24
Subject: Re: Latin Mass to Vernacular, was Re: Consecutive Terms
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65945 From: Christer Edling Date: 2009-05-24
Subject: Re: Some are trying to set up a one candidate race NOT
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65946 From: L Julia Aquila Date: 2009-05-24
Subject: Re: Candidacy!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65947 From: Publius Ullerius Stephanus Venator Date: 2009-05-24
Subject: Re: Latin Mass to Vernacular, was Re: Consecutive Terms
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65948 From: Drusilla Date: 2009-05-24
Subject: MY SUPPORT FOR K. FABIUS BUTEO MODIANUS
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65949 From: Timothy or Stephen Gallagher Date: 2009-05-24
Subject: FW: [Explorator] explorator 12.05
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65950 From: Gnaeus Iulius Caesar Date: 2009-05-24
Subject: Re: Some are trying to set up a one candidate race
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65951 From: Christer Edling Date: 2009-05-24
Subject: Two reasonable people should not fight, even if they don't share opi
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65952 From: Jesse Corradino Date: 2009-05-24
Subject: Re: Some are trying to set up a one candidate race NOT
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65953 From: A. Sempronius Regulus Date: 2009-05-24
Subject: Re: our untapped resource
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65954 From: Christer Edling Date: 2009-05-24
Subject: Re: Some are trying to set up a one candidate race
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65955 From: Maior Date: 2009-05-24
Subject: Re: NR Floralia updates
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65956 From: L Julia Aquila Date: 2009-05-24
Subject: Re: Two reasonable people should not fight, even if they don't share
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65957 From: enodia2002 Date: 2009-05-24
Subject: Post-Cannes Reaction to "AGORA"
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65958 From: C. Maria Caeca Date: 2009-05-24
Subject: Re: our untapped resource
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65959 From: Gnaeus Iulius Caesar Date: 2009-05-24
Subject: Re: Some are trying to set up a one candidate race
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65960 From: C. Maria Caeca Date: 2009-05-24
Subject: Re: Post-Cannes Reaction to "AGORA"
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65961 From: Maior Date: 2009-05-24
Subject: Re: Some are trying to set up a one candidate race
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65962 From: Gnaeus Iulius Caesar Date: 2009-05-24
Subject: Re: Some are trying to set up a one candidate race
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65963 From: Christer Edling Date: 2009-05-24
Subject: Re: Some are trying to set up a one candidate race
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65964 From: L Julia Aquila Date: 2009-05-24
Subject: Re: our untapped resource
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65965 From: C. Maria Caeca Date: 2009-05-24
Subject: Re: our untapped resource
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65966 From: Gnaeus Iulius Caesar Date: 2009-05-24
Subject: Re: Some are trying to set up a one candidate race
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65967 From: L Julia Aquila Date: 2009-05-24
Subject: Re: our untapped resource
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65968 From: David Kling Date: 2009-05-24
Subject: Re: Latin Mass to Vernacular, was Re: Consecutive Terms
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65969 From: David Kling Date: 2009-05-24
Subject: Re: MY SUPPORT FOR K. FABIUS BUTEO MODIANUS
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65970 From: David Kling Date: 2009-05-24
Subject: Re: NR Floralia updates
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65971 From: Publius Ullerius Stephanus Venator Date: 2009-05-24
Subject: Re: Latin Mass to Vernacular, was Re: Consecutive Terms
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65972 From: C. Maria Caeca Date: 2009-05-24
Subject: Re: our untapped resource
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65973 From: David Kling Date: 2009-05-24
Subject: Re: Latin Mass to Vernacular, was Re: Consecutive Terms
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65974 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2009-05-24
Subject: Re: consecutive
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65975 From: L Julia Aquila Date: 2009-05-24
Subject: Re: Classic Poetry, Prose, Proems
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65976 From: Gnaeus Iulius Caesar Date: 2009-05-24
Subject: Re: consecutive
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65977 From: Publius Ullerius Stephanus Venator Date: 2009-05-24
Subject: US Memorial Day approaches. . .
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65978 From: L Julia Aquila Date: 2009-05-24
Subject: Re: US Memorial Day approaches. . .
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65979 From: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com Date: 2009-05-24
Subject: Comitia Centuriata Election, 5/24/2009, 11:00 pm
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65980 From: C. Maria Caeca Date: 2009-05-24
Subject: Re: US Memorial Day approaches. . .
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65981 From: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com Date: 2009-05-24
Subject: Comitia Centuriata Election, 5/24/2009, 11:00 pm
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65982 From: L Julia Aquila Date: 2009-05-24
Subject: Re: NR Floralia updates
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65983 From: C. Maria Caeca Date: 2009-05-24
Subject: Re: NR Floralia updates
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65984 From: L Julia Aquila Date: 2009-05-24
Subject: Re: US Memorial Day approaches. . .
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65985 From: C. Maria Caeca Date: 2009-05-24
Subject: Dover Beach by Matthew Arnold
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65986 From: Publius Ullerius Stephanus Venator Date: 2009-05-24
Subject: Re: US Memorial Day approaches. . .
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65987 From: Publius Ullerius Stephanus Venator Date: 2009-05-24
Subject: Re: Dover Beach by Matthew Arnold
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65988 From: C. Maria Caeca Date: 2009-05-24
Subject: Re: Dover Beach by Matthew Arnold
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65989 From: Publius Ullerius Stephanus Venator Date: 2009-05-24
Subject: Re: Dover Beach by Matthew Arnold
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65990 From: C. Maria Caeca Date: 2009-05-24
Subject: Re: Dover Beach by Matthew Arnold
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65991 From: Roger Date: 2009-05-24
Subject: Idea for New NR Project: Recognition to Solemnize Marriages in Ontar
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65992 From: Maior Date: 2009-05-24
Subject: Re: Some are trying to set up a one candidate race
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65993 From: Gnaeus Iulius Caesar Date: 2009-05-24
Subject: Re: Some are trying to set up a one candidate race
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65994 From: Vaughn Date: 2009-05-24
Subject: Re: Idea for New NR Project: Recognition to Solemnize Marriages in O
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65995 From: Maior Date: 2009-05-25
Subject: Re: Some are trying to set up a one candidate race
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65996 From: Gnaeus Iulius Caesar Date: 2009-05-25
Subject: Re: Some are trying to set up a one candidate race
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65997 From: MCC Date: 2009-05-25
Subject: COMITIA CENTURIATA: Election for Censor
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65998 From: Maior Date: 2009-05-25
Subject: Re: Some are trying to set up a one candidate race
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65999 From: Gnaeus Iulius Caesar Date: 2009-05-25
Subject: Re: Some are trying to set up a one candidate race
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66000 From: MCC Date: 2009-05-25
Subject: Re: COMITIA CENTURIATA: Election for Censor
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66001 From: QFabiusMaxmi@aol.com Date: 2009-05-25
Subject: Re: MY SUPPORT FOR K. FABIUS BUTEO MODIANUS
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66002 From: fabiadrusilla Date: 2009-05-25
Subject: Re: MY SUPPORT FOR K. FABIUS BUTEO MODIANUS
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66003 From: David Kling Date: 2009-05-25
Subject: Re: MY SUPPORT FOR K. FABIUS BUTEO MODIANUS
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66004 From: A. Sempronius Regulus Date: 2009-05-25
Subject: Re: our untapped resource
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66005 From: A. Sempronius Regulus Date: 2009-05-25
Subject: Re: our untapped resource
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66006 From: A. Sempronius Regulus Date: 2009-05-25
Subject: Re: our untapped resource
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66007 From: livia_plauta Date: 2009-05-25
Subject: Re: Help with trip to Rome
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66008 From: livia_plauta Date: 2009-05-25
Subject: Re: Help with trip to Rome
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66009 From: L Julia Aquila Date: 2009-05-25
Subject: Re: our untapped resource
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66010 From: L Julia Aquila Date: 2009-05-25
Subject: Re: our untapped resource
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66011 From: livia_plauta Date: 2009-05-25
Subject: A dream come true
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66012 From: L Julia Aquila Date: 2009-05-25
Subject: Re: Classic Poetry, Prose, Proems



Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65835 From: Charlie Collins Date: 2009-05-22
Subject: History of Rome Podcast
Salve,

I found this Podcast while looking on iTunes for stuff to put on my
new iPod Touch. I haven't listened to any of it yet, but I thought I
would pass it on.

http://thehistoryofrome.typepad.com/the_history_of_rome/

Vale,
Quintus Servilius Priscus

--
Deism: A Non-Prophet Religion
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65836 From: Q. Valerius Poplicola Date: 2009-05-22
Subject: Re: Candidacy - Opinion of Fl. Galerius Aurelianus Tribunus Plebis
Both Audens and Venator would be excellent censors.

AUDENS OR VENATOR FOR CENSOR!

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, QFabiusMaxmi@... wrote:
>
>
> In a message dated 5/22/2009 12:39:08 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
> PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@... writes:
>
> When it was announced that the candidacy of Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus
> had been accepted by the proper authority, several of the Tribunes expected
> some immediate appeals from the People to pronounce intercessio against it.
> However, no one . . . let me repeat . . . NO ONE contacted myself or any
> of the other Tribunes (to the best of my knowledge) with a request that it
> was illegal under the existing laws and should be vetoed. As such, the thee
> day window to pronounce the intercessio came and went with nary a whisper.
>
>
>
>
> OK, so what you are saying here, had Cato claimed that Modianus as Censor
> would cause Cato as a citizen to be harmed, you'd done something? What an
> ridiculous statement. You are not Roman Tribunes, you are Nova Roma
> Tribunes. Your job is to keep magistrates from abusing the Constitution, that
> means you observe and react to such abuse. You don't sit around and sigh:
> "Oh too bad. No one objected to that law breaker. And its too late."
> At the very least you should have protested the term violation either to
> the Senate or the Consuls. Aureliane your own Gensmate made an appeal to
> the Tribunes. For you to ignore him, was not cool.
>
> I remember Tribunes of the 1999-2003 period. Now those were Tribunes!
> They stuck their nose into everything, asked or unasked. They acted much
> like Spartan Ephors. NR ran much better because of it.
>
> I believe the only way out of this mess, is that the Consuls void both
> candidates, the Senate appoints a neutral player like Audens or Venator to
> serve out the remaining year as a an replacement.
>
> Otherwise, I see NR paralyzed for the rest of the year.
>
> Q. Fabius Maximus
> **************Stay connected and tighten your budget with a great mobile
> device for under $50. Take a Peek!
> (http://pr.atwola.com/promoclk/100122638x1221845911x1201401556/aol?redir=http://www.getpeek.com/aol)
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65837 From: Jesse Corradino Date: 2009-05-22
Subject: Re: Sulla's rebuttal - Re: Nova-Roma is my life (Was:The Cancer of N
Six to eight college classes at a time?  That's laughable...  What are the subjects in these "classes" pray tell?  Yarn Observation?  Pen Collecting?  I'm a doctoral student in mathematics and have attended several schools and have never in my life encountered a single individual that teaches that many different classes; I'm fairly sure that this is impossible unless one teaches courses with the above fatuous topics.
 

To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
From: PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@...
Date: Fri, 22 May 2009 15:57:28 -0400
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Sulla's rebuttal - Re: Nova-Roma is my life (Was:The Cancer of Nova Roma)



Sulla,

Much like Germanicus and Drusus, your best days are behind you.  All that is left are the bitter dregs of a once good vintage.  I like fruit wine as much as the next man but when all that is left is sour crab apples and muscadines, it is time to give it up.

Aureliane


-----Original Message-----
From: Robert Woolwine <l_cornelius_sulla@...>
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thu, 21 May 2009 9:37 pm
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Sulla's rebuttal - Re: Nova-Roma is my life (Was:The Cancer of Nova Roma)



Vestal,

Interesting post.

NR is your life? Seriously? NR is your life? So what would happen if NR ceased to exist? Would the purpose of your life be snuffed out and you would have no reason to live?

Is that point of view really healthy? This is a voluntary internet corporation and you place it with such importance that it is YOUR LIFE?

I did find it interesting that you and I have more in common than I thought - in regards to suing former employers. One would think that given your experience you would have more respect for following the law.

Overall an interesting post. Good luck with20your college education.

And, respect and dignity are earned they are not freely given. This is not a dominate. I have taken oaths too. If we want to play the NR pointy hat comparison game I think my experience and time devoted to NR trumps yours. Having been Consul twice, Censor twice, Preator Urbanus, Quaestor, the first Nova Roman to complete the Cursus Honorum, the first Jewish Consul. First Nova Roman to complete the Lustrum of the Censorship. But, as Aurelianus says my absence for 4 years negates all that previous experience (see Aurelianus I jumped the gun on you). Nevertheless, NR is not the sum of my life. My family, my sister's family and my friends are just as important. As are my cats. As is my upcoming aliyah. The point is keeping a balance between REAL world and NR.

Do you not think that I have received the positions and respect in my jobs without having integrity and respect? Do you think I would have been Consul twice without having integrity and respect? If I did not have those things I would not be the threat that TPTB think that I am. (Well that and my name). You're problem with me is that I am blunt, abrasive, conservative to the hilt, reconstructionist, emotional and extremely vocal. Despite all of those flaws I speak what I believe to be the truth and do so adamantly and will not cease to do so.

Saying NR is your life sounds honestly, very RPGish to me. And, nice job trying to add words to my post - I am the LAST person to=2 0tell anyone that opinions do not count - You are obviously confusing me with the Praetors.

Vale,

Sulla

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com, violetphearsen@ ... wrote:
>
>
>
>
> You have no right to tell me, nor any other Nova Roman, that our opinions do not count. Every person here is entitled to his or her opinion, whether you like it or not.
> You speak of material things. I speak of integrity and honesty.
> If you are a man of such accomplishments as you claim, then why do you not treat others here in Nova Roma with dignity and respect? Here among us you act like a loud-mouth bully, throwing tantrums whenever you don't get your way. You always have. Those are not the actions of a distinguished  and honorable man.
> As always, Sulla, your actions belie your words.
>  
> You want my CV, do you? All right.
>  
>
> I have, over the past seventeen years, developed my devotion to Vesta and to all the Gods and Goddesses of Roma. Then four and a half years ago, I discover Nova Roma. I spent about ten minutes reading everything on our website and then I applied for citizenship without any hesitation because I knew right then and there that Nova Roma was where I wanted to be for the rest of my life.
>  
> When my citizenship was granted to me, I was so very happy, but that happiness did not last long. In my first month as a new citizen in Nova Roma, I became the target of a flame war aimed directly at me by the Boni, of which you were part of, over the topic of animal sacrifice. I was almost kicked out, but cooler heads prevailed. Despite this tumultous beginning, I stayed dedicated to Nova Roma, made some good friends and kept to my studies of the Religio Romana.
>  
> After a year and a half, I submitted my application to join the College of Vestals. At the time, Nova Roma had just one Vestal, my friend, Lucia Modia Lupa. The happiest day I have ever experienced in Nova Roma was January 11, 2006 when Quintus Caecilius Metellus issued the Decreta Pontificum that announced that I was accepted as Sacerdos Vestalis. The saddest day in Nova Roma, for me, was when Lucia Modia Lupa had to retire as a Vestal, as her real life struggles to recover from the havoc Katrina had brought into her life took all her time and energy.
>  
> Then changes began to be made and there was progress going on with the Collegium Pontificum, which admitted me as a member; and a time thereafter, I became the Virgo Maxima. That was the greatest honor I have ever received.
>  
> Now, to become a Vestal in more than just name meant changing my life in big ways, from embracing celibacy and striving for chastity in thought, word and deed, to always speaking the truth or saying nothing at all, to prayin g twice daily to Vesta, to building my own special altar to hold a continuously lit candle, to learning how to start a fire by rubbing two sticks together, to creating rituals for the various festivals of the Roman calendar in which the ancient Vestals participated in, to building an outdoor hearth. All this while still dealing with real life problems that came with caring for elderly parents, maintaining a house and a full time job; and eventually, two jobs. Added to this was my involvement in a lawsuit against my former employer, who had unjustly fired me, along with fourteen other fellow employees, for reporting illegal practices the company was involved in. We won the lawsuit, but it took years.
>  
> Even with all these changes, when I was made the Vestale Maxima, I felt I had to do more. I began working at creating a website to honor Vesta which I wanted to have not only a virtual Temple of Vesta, but a virtual Forum, too. A young woman who had once subscribed to the ML (but after witnessing flame war after flame war, she unsubscribed) offered to help me. We became good friends and she expressed a strong desire to serve Vesta, too.
>  
> I had been very active in some local pagan groups and every chance I got, I brought up my new devotion to Vesta. From these groups came forth another young woman who told me she shared a strong desire to serve Vesta as well. I decided to open up my house to these two women and tr ain them as Vestals, passing on to them all I had learned in my studies and helping them to initiate studies of their own, and so they moved in with me. 
>  
> Then, through some real life changes that happened to all three of us, which included the passing away of my father, we moved to a house which came with a big fireplace and I had it converted into an indoor hearth. We brought the outdoor hearth built at the old house with us to the new house (and that was no easy feat). Now, with an indoor hearth, we could keep a small fire continuously lit, which we began doing on the first of this year. We have set up a schedule wherein we each take turns watching over the fire in shifts. We use the outdoor hearth for public rituals, of which we have had three so far, with a small group of pagan friends in attendance. Nothing big yet, but it's a start.
>  
> I still have two jobs. One of my apprentices also has a full time job while the other is half way through college and has a part time job. Our ultimate goal is to one day move to Rome to live there permanently. However, I would like to built a Temple to Vesta here in the US. I have no idea if I will succeed in either of these goals, but I am determined and trying as best I can. 
>  
> I have no desire to attain high status in the world or to achieve fame or be given positions of authority or to accumulate vast amounts of wealth.20My goal in life is to serve Vesta, and all the Gods and Goddesses of Roma, and to bring to fruition our noble goal - to recreate the greatness that was Rome in our own respublica - Nova Roma. I have committed my life to it.
>  
> And I will defend Nova Roma against any I perceive who threaten her present existence and future success. Nova Roma is here and now, already an actuality and growing every day. You may find all that I have said hard to understand, but that may be because this is not a game to me. Nova Roma is my life.
>  
> Maxima Valeria Messallina
> Sacerdos Vestalis
>  
>
> "Nihil apud Romanos Templo Vestae sanctius habetur."
> "Among the Romans nothing is held more holy than the Temple of Vesta."
>  
>  
>
> --- On Thu, 5/21/09, Robert Woolwine <l_cornelius_ sulla@... > wrote:
>
>
> From: Robert Woolwine <l_cornelius_ sulla@... >
> Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: The Cancer of Nova Roma
> To: Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com
> Date: Thursday, May 21, 2009, 1:14 PM
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> LOL!!!!
>
> How awesome is this! This is almost as good as making Aurelianus (virtually) vomit.
>
> Let me educate you about me.
>
> In my 37 years of life I have been very pleased with w hat I have accomplished. I have two Masters Degrees (MBA and Education). I have a Bachelors Degree in Political Science and a Paralegal's Degree.
>
> Most of my 20s were spent in college.
>
> Over 4 years ago I moved to AZ, in that time I went from having nothing of value, living with my sister, after my apartment break-ins and the death of my kitten. In a dramatic two years I bought a home, purchased the furnishings of my home AND spend $20k on my dream vacation to Israel.
>
> I have positions of responsibility and authority in both of the jobs that I own. Comptroller of a construction company in Phoenix and a college professor. I am authorized to sign for contracts, waivers, accounting, payroll, benefits and am a notary public for the state of Arizona. I have passed checks and investigations. I have been the President of a conglomerate (Taurus Communications) .
>
> You might think I am a cancer, but I have been nominated for Who's Who in Phoenix. You might think I am a cancer, but I am responsible for running a multi-million dollar business. You might think I am a cancer, but I regularly teach 6-8 COLLEGE classes at a time.
>
> In other words, to say it politely, your opinion means nothing. Especially compared to what I have accomplished in my life.
>
> Now, Vestal, lets see your CV?
>
> Vale,
>
> Sulla
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com, vi oletphearsen@ ... wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > Do you not know what a metaphor is, Sulla? I shall explain it to you: "a figure of speech in which a term or phrase is applied to something to which it is not literally applicable in order to suggest a resemblance. "
> > �
> > You do indeed�resemble a creeping cancer eagerly tearing away at the very fabric of Nova Roma. By every word you write, you pollute the main list with vile and negativity. Your every act, or threatened action, creates a miasma of noxious fumes and the stench sickens all. Yes, like a cancer that once disappeared, you have returned again and your goal, it would seem, is to kill Nova Roma. Who else has threatened our Nova Roma with a lawsuit and parades email after email supposedly from an attorney general on this list, with no less an intention that to disband Nova Roma?
> > Sulla, you are a sad specimen of a man.
> > If you want to threaten me, insult me, make jokes at my expense, go right ahead. Please, continue to show all Nova Romans the true caliber of your person. Don't stop on my account.
> > �
> > Yes, Citizens, I am a Vestal and the Virgo Maxima, too. As such, I have sworn to always speak the truth and I have. This man engages in tactics of divisiveness, spewing animosity, displaying utter contemptuousness for any citizen, even the Virgo Maxima, for daring to tell the truth of what he really is. With his doublespeak, he tries to ensnare and mislead. Fortunately for us,�the Gods know what he really�is. You can pretend before men, Sulla, but Vesta knows the truth of my words.
> > �
> > Maxima Valeria Messallina
> > Sacerdos Vestalis
> > �
> >
> > --- On Thu, 5/21/09, Robert Woolwine <l_cornelius_ sulla@ > wrote:
> >
> >
> > From: Robert Woolwine <l_cornelius_ sulla@ >
> > Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: All those who endorsed Modianus - Question for you?
> > To: Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com
> > Date: Thursday, May 21, 2009, 11:33 AM
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Better to be a cancer than a law breaker!
> >
> > Better to be a cancer than a friend of a law breaker
> >
> > Better to be a cancer than a friend to a neo-nazi and who appointed a neo-nazi to the Senate of Nova Roma!
> >
> > Better to be a cancer than a panderer.
> >
> > Better to be a cancer - than to show a complete lack of dignitas and judgement (azresident. mee.nu/warning) .
> >
> > And, this ladies and gentlemen is our Vestal! Are you a medical professional that has personally diagnosed me with some type of cancer that my Dr. has missed? Or is this just an opinion?
> >
> > Vale,
> >
> > Sulla
> >
> > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com, Maxima Valeria Messallina <violetphearsen@ ...> wrote:
> > >
> > > I said it before and I will say it again - Sulla is a cancer on Nova Roma.
> > > �
> > > �
> > > Maxima Valeria Messallina
> > > Sacerdos Vestalis
> > >
> > >
> > > --- On Thu, 5/21/09, PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@ ... <PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@ ...> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > From: PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@ ... <PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@ ...>
> > > Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: All those who endorsed Modianus - Question for you?
> > > To: Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com
> > > Date: Thursday, May 21, 2009, 8:04 AM
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > The opinion of someone who quit NR for nearly five years with no communication.
> > > When he returned he posted numerous posts that were aggravating, insulting, and useless.
> > > The first person in the history of NR to begin a lawsuit when he did not get his way.
> > > Someone who contnues to use the threat of legal action to accomplish his goals; whatever the hell they are.
> > > Someone who doesn't contribute to the Sacra et Religio but feels he is qualified to criticize the members of the�CP.
> > > An empty wine sack full of fumes and dregs of better days.
> > > Put them all together it spells S-U-L-L-A, a word that means excrement to me.
> > >
> > > Fl. Galerius Aurelianus
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Robert Woolwine <l_cornelius_ sulla@yahoo. com>
> > > To: Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com
> > > Sent: Wed, 20 May 2009 8:53 am
> > > Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: All those who endorsed Modianus - Question for you?
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > You know the answer to that, already.
> > >
> > > Xtian pontiffs.
> > > near lawsuit before - most likely to happen again if Modianus because censor
> > > Declining NR organization.
> > > Magistrates and their subordinates who have no respect for the law
> > >
> > > Need I go on?
> > >
> > > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com, Matt Hucke <hucke@> wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > >20Are you truly willing to join up with someone who has tried to create other
> > > > > organizations that competed and tried to subvert Nova Roma? If so, why?
> > > >
> > > > Uh, you yourself are *currently* involved in an effort to create another
> > > > organization that competes with Nova Roma.
> > > >
> > > > Not that there's anything wrong with that (I'm involved too, peripherally) .
> > > >
> > > > But how can you criticize someone else for doing a thing in the past while
> > > > you're doing exactly the same right now?
> > > >
> > > > O.
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Matt Hucke (hucke@), programmer.
> > > > author, Graveyards of Illinois - http://graveyards. com/
> > > > CYNICO.NET - hosting from $8.33/month; domains $13 - http://cynico. net/
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Huge savings on HDTVs from Dell.com!
> > >
> >
>





Windows Liveâ„¢: Keep your life in sync. Check it out.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65838 From: C. Maria Caeca Date: 2009-05-22
Subject: procedural question
Salvete Omnes,

A procedural question, if I may. Must the tribunes receive a r4equest,
either from a citizen or a magistrate to evaluate and pronounce on a legal
action, or can they act independently upon the published action, edict,
candidacy or proposed legislation?

Respectfully,
C. Maria Caeca
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65839 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2009-05-23
Subject: Sulla's Teaching Skills
Ave,

I have been teaching college for over 3 years - and was confirmed full time faculty.

You basically want a list of classes I teach? Sure here you go:

Foundations of Business
Critical Thinking
Cultural Diversity
Skills in an Information Age
Introduction to World Cultures and Social Environments
Supervision and Leadership
Organizational Theory and Behavior
Political, Legal and Ethical Environments of Business
Introduction to Marketing
Financial Accounting 1

This are the classes I have been approved to teach. I, on average teach between 6-8 classes at a time.

This job paid for my trip to Israel. Nice try whoever you are.

Vale,

Sulla

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Jesse Corradino <woden66@...> wrote:
>
>
> Six to eight college classes at a time? That's laughable... What are the subjects in these "classes" pray tell? Yarn Observation? Pen Collecting? I'm a doctoral student in mathematics and have attended several schools and have never in my life encountered a single individual that teaches that many different classes; I'm fairly sure that this is impossible unless one teaches courses with the above fatuous topics.
>
>
>
> To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> From: PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@...
> Date: Fri, 22 May 2009 15:57:28 -0400
> Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Sulla's rebuttal - Re: Nova-Roma is my life (Was:The Cancer of Nova Roma)
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Sulla,
>
> Much like Germanicus and Drusus, your best days are behind you. All that is left are the bitter dregs of a once good vintage. I like fruit wine as much as the next man but when all that is left is sour crab apples and muscadines, it is time to give it up.
>
> Aureliane
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Robert Woolwine <l_cornelius_sulla@...>
> To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Thu, 21 May 2009 9:37 pm
> Subject: [Nova-Roma] Sulla's rebuttal - Re: Nova-Roma is my life (Was:The Cancer of Nova Roma)
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Vestal,
>
> Interesting post.
>
> NR is your life? Seriously? NR is your life? So what would happen if NR ceased to exist? Would the purpose of your life be snuffed out and you would have no reason to live?
>
> Is that point of view really healthy? This is a voluntary internet corporation and you place it with such importance that it is YOUR LIFE?
>
> I did find it interesting that you and I have more in common than I thought - in regards to suing former employers. One would think that given your experience you would have more respect for following the law.
>
> Overall an interesting post. Good luck with20your college education.
>
> And, respect and dignity are earned they are not freely given. This is not a dominate. I have taken oaths too. If we want to play the NR pointy hat comparison game I think my experience and time devoted to NR trumps yours. Having been Consul twice, Censor twice, Preator Urbanus, Quaestor, the first Nova Roman to complete the Cursus Honorum, the first Jewish Consul. First Nova Roman to complete the Lustrum of the Censorship. But, as Aurelianus says my absence for 4 years negates all that previous experience (see Aurelianus I jumped the gun on you). Nevertheless, NR is not the sum of my life. My family, my sister's family and my friends are just as important. As are my cats. As is my upcoming aliyah. The point is keeping a balance between REAL world and NR.
>
> Do you not think that I have received the positions and respect in my jobs without having integrity and respect? Do you think I would have been Consul twice without having integrity and respect? If I did not have those things I would not be the threat that TPTB think that I am. (Well that and my name). You're problem with me is that I am blunt, abrasive, conservative to the hilt, reconstructionist, emotional and extremely vocal. Despite all of those flaws I speak what I believe to be the truth and do so adamantly and will not cease to do so.
>
> Saying NR is your life sounds honestly, very RPGish to me. And, nice job trying to add words to my post - I am the LAST person to=2 0tell anyone that opinions do not count - You are obviously confusing me with the Praetors.
>
> Vale,
>
> Sulla
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, violetphearsen@ wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > You have no right to tell me, nor any other Nova Roman, that our opinions do not count. Every person here is entitled to his or her opinion, whether you like it or not.
> > You speak of material things. I speak of integrity and honesty.
> > If you are a man of such accomplishments as you claim, then why do you not treat others here in Nova Roma with dignity and respect? Here among us you act like a loud-mouth bully, throwing tantrums whenever you don't get your way. You always have. Those are not the actions of a distinguished and honorable man.
> > As always, Sulla, your actions belie your words.
> >
> > You want my CV, do you? All right.
> >
> >
> > I have, over the past seventeen years, developed my devotion to Vesta and to all the Gods and Goddesses of Roma. Then four and a half years ago, I discover Nova Roma. I spent about ten minutes reading everything on our website and then I applied for citizenship without any hesitation because I knew right then and there that Nova Roma was where I wanted to be for the rest of my life.
> >
> > When my citizenship was granted to me, I was so very happy, but that happiness did not last long. In my first month as a new citizen in Nova Roma, I became the target of a flame war aimed directly at me by the Boni, of which you were part of, over the topic of animal sacrifice. I was almost kicked out, but cooler heads prevailed. Despite this tumultous beginning, I stayed dedicated to Nova Roma, made some good friends and kept to my studies of the Religio Romana.
> >
> > After a year and a half, I submitted my application to join the College of Vestals. At the time, Nova Roma had just one Vestal, my friend, Lucia Modia Lupa. The happiest day I have ever experienced in Nova Roma was January 11, 2006 when Quintus Caecilius Metellus issued the Decreta Pontificum that announced that I was accepted as Sacerdos Vestalis. The saddest day in Nova Roma, for me, was when Lucia Modia Lupa had to retire as a Vestal, as her real life struggles to recover from the havoc Katrina had brought into her life took all her time and energy.
> >
> > Then changes began to be made and there was progress going on with the Collegium Pontificum, which admitted me as a member; and a time thereafter, I became the Virgo Maxima. That was the greatest honor I have ever received.
> >
> > Now, to become a Vestal in more than just name meant changing my life in big ways, from embracing celibacy and striving for chastity in thought, word and deed, to always speaking the truth or saying nothing at all, to prayin g twice daily to Vesta, to building my own special altar to hold a continuously lit candle, to learning how to start a fire by rubbing two sticks together, to creating rituals for the various festivals of the Roman calendar in which the ancient Vestals participated in, to building an outdoor hearth. All this while still dealing with real life problems that came with caring for elderly parents, maintaining a house and a full time job; and eventually, two jobs. Added to this was my involvement in a lawsuit against my former employer, who had unjustly fired me, along with fourteen other fellow employees, for reporting illegal practices the company was involved in. We won the lawsuit, but it took years.
> >
> > Even with all these changes, when I was made the Vestale Maxima, I felt I had to do more. I began working at creating a website to honor Vesta which I wanted to have not only a virtual Temple of Vesta, but a virtual Forum, too. A young woman who had once subscribed to the ML (but after witnessing flame war after flame war, she unsubscribed) offered to help me. We became good friends and she expressed a strong desire to serve Vesta, too.
> >
> > I had been very active in some local pagan groups and every chance I got, I brought up my new devotion to Vesta. From these groups came forth another young woman who told me she shared a strong desire to serve Vesta as well. I decided to open up my house to these two women and tr ain them as Vestals, passing on to them all I had learned in my studies and helping them to initiate studies of their own, and so they moved in with me.
> >
> > Then, through some real life changes that happened to all three of us, which included the passing away of my father, we moved to a house which came with a big fireplace and I had it converted into an indoor hearth. We brought the outdoor hearth built at the old house with us to the new house (and that was no easy feat). Now, with an indoor hearth, we could keep a small fire continuously lit, which we began doing on the first of this year. We have set up a schedule wherein we each take turns watching over the fire in shifts. We use the outdoor hearth for public rituals, of which we have had three so far, with a small group of pagan friends in attendance. Nothing big yet, but it's a start.
> >
> > I still have two jobs. One of my apprentices also has a full time job while the other is half way through college and has a part time job. Our ultimate goal is to one day move to Rome to live there permanently. However, I would like to built a Temple to Vesta here in the US. I have no idea if I will succeed in either of these goals, but I am determined and trying as best I can.
> >
> > I have no desire to attain high status in the world or to achieve fame or be given positions of authority or to accumulate vast amounts of wealth.20My goal in life is to serve Vesta, and all the Gods and Goddesses of Roma, and to bring to fruition our noble goal - to recreate the greatness that was Rome in our own respublica - Nova Roma. I have committed my life to it.
> >
> > And I will defend Nova Roma against any I perceive who threaten her present existence and future success. Nova Roma is here and now, already an actuality and growing every day. You may find all that I have said hard to understand, but that may be because this is not a game to me. Nova Roma is my life.
> >
> > Maxima Valeria Messallina
> > Sacerdos Vestalis
> >
> >
> > "Nihil apud Romanos Templo Vestae sanctius habetur."
> > "Among the Romans nothing is held more holy than the Temple of Vesta."
> >
> >
> >
> > --- On Thu, 5/21/09, Robert Woolwine <l_cornelius_sulla@> wrote:
> >
> >
> > From: Robert Woolwine <l_cornelius_sulla@>
> > Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: The Cancer of Nova Roma
> > To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> > Date: Thursday, May 21, 2009, 1:14 PM
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > LOL!!!!
> >
> > How awesome is this! This is almost as good as making Aurelianus (virtually) vomit.
> >
> > Let me educate you about me.
> >
> > In my 37 years of life I have been very pleased with w hat I have accomplished. I have two Masters Degrees (MBA and Education). I have a Bachelors Degree in Political Science and a Paralegal's Degree.
> >
> > Most of my 20s were spent in college.
> >
> > Over 4 years ago I moved to AZ, in that time I went from having nothing of value, living with my sister, after my apartment break-ins and the death of my kitten. In a dramatic two years I bought a home, purchased the furnishings of my home AND spend $20k on my dream vacation to Israel.
> >
> > I have positions of responsibility and authority in both of the jobs that I own. Comptroller of a construction company in Phoenix and a college professor. I am authorized to sign for contracts, waivers, accounting, payroll, benefits and am a notary public for the state of Arizona. I have passed checks and investigations. I have been the President of a conglomerate (Taurus Communications) .
> >
> > You might think I am a cancer, but I have been nominated for Who's Who in Phoenix. You might think I am a cancer, but I am responsible for running a multi-million dollar business. You might think I am a cancer, but I regularly teach 6-8 COLLEGE classes at a time.
> >
> > In other words, to say it politely, your opinion means nothing. Especially compared to what I have accomplished in my life.
> >
> > Now, Vestal, lets see your CV?
> >
> > Vale,
> >
> > Sulla
> >
> > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com, vi oletphearsen@ ... wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Do you not know what a metaphor is, Sulla? I shall explain it to you: "a figure of speech in which a term or phrase is applied to something to which it is not literally applicable in order to suggest a resemblance. "
> > > �
> > > You do indeed�resemble a creeping cancer eagerly tearing away at the very fabric of Nova Roma. By every word you write, you pollute the main list with vile and negativity. Your every act, or threatened action, creates a miasma of noxious fumes and the stench sickens all. Yes, like a cancer that once disappeared, you have returned again and your goal, it would seem, is to kill Nova Roma. Who else has threatened our Nova Roma with a lawsuit and parades email after email supposedly from an attorney general on this list, with no less an intention that to disband Nova Roma?
> > > Sulla, you are a sad specimen of a man.
> > > If you want to threaten me, insult me, make jokes at my expense, go right ahead. Please, continue to show all Nova Romans the true caliber of your person. Don't stop on my account.
> > > �
> > > Yes, Citizens, I am a Vestal and the Virgo Maxima, too. As such, I have sworn to always speak the truth and I have. This man engages in tactics of divisiveness, spewing animosity, displaying utter contemptuousness for any citizen, even the Virgo Maxima, for daring to tell the truth of what he really is. With his doublespeak, he tries to ensnare and mislead. Fortunately for us,�the Gods know what he really�is. You can pretend before men, Sulla, but Vesta knows the truth of my words.
> > > �
> > > Maxima Valeria Messallina
> > > Sacerdos Vestalis
> > > �
> > >
> > > --- On Thu, 5/21/09, Robert Woolwine <l_cornelius_ sulla@ > wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > From: Robert Woolwine <l_cornelius_ sulla@ >
> > > Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: All those who endorsed Modianus - Question for you?
> > > To: Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com
> > > Date: Thursday, May 21, 2009, 11:33 AM
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Better to be a cancer than a law breaker!
> > >
> > > Better to be a cancer than a friend of a law breaker
> > >
> > > Better to be a cancer than a friend to a neo-nazi and who appointed a neo-nazi to the Senate of Nova Roma!
> > >
> > > Better to be a cancer than a panderer.
> > >
> > > Better to be a cancer - than to show a complete lack of dignitas and judgement (azresident. mee.nu/warning) .
> > >
> > > And, this ladies and gentlemen is our Vestal! Are you a medical professional that has personally diagnosed me with some type of cancer that my Dr. has missed? Or is this just an opinion?
> > >
> > > Vale,
> > >
> > > Sulla
> > >
> > > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com, Maxima Valeria Messallina <violetphearsen@ ...> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > I said it before and I will say it again - Sulla is a cancer on Nova Roma.
> > > > �
> > > > �
> > > > Maxima Valeria Messallina
> > > > Sacerdos Vestalis
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --- On Thu, 5/21/09, PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@ ... <PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@ ...> wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > From: PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@ ... <PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@ ...>
> > > > Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: All those who endorsed Modianus - Question for you?
> > > > To: Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com
> > > > Date: Thursday, May 21, 2009, 8:04 AM
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > The opinion of someone who quit NR for nearly five years with no communication.
> > > > When he returned he posted numerous posts that were aggravating, insulting, and useless.
> > > > The first person in the history of NR to begin a lawsuit when he did not get his way.
> > > > Someone who contnues to use the threat of legal action to accomplish his goals; whatever the hell they are.
> > > > Someone who doesn't contribute to the Sacra et Religio but feels he is qualified to criticize the members of the�CP.
> > > > An empty wine sack full of fumes and dregs of better days.
> > > > Put them all together it spells S-U-L-L-A, a word that means excrement to me.
> > > >
> > > > Fl. Galerius Aurelianus
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Robert Woolwine <l_cornelius_ sulla@yahoo. com>
> > > > To: Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com
> > > > Sent: Wed, 20 May 2009 8:53 am
> > > > Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: All those who endorsed Modianus - Question for you?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > You know the answer to that, already.
> > > >
> > > > Xtian pontiffs.
> > > > near lawsuit before - most likely to happen again if Modianus because censor
> > > > Declining NR organization.
> > > > Magistrates and their subordinates who have no respect for the law
> > > >
> > > > Need I go on?
> > > >
> > > > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com, Matt Hucke <hucke@> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > >20Are you truly willing to join up with someone who has tried to create other
> > > > > > organizations that competed and tried to subvert Nova Roma? If so, why?
> > > > >
> > > > > Uh, you yourself are *currently* involved in an effort to create another
> > > > > organization that competes with Nova Roma.
> > > > >
> > > > > Not that there's anything wrong with that (I'm involved too, peripherally) .
> > > > >
> > > > > But how can you criticize someone else for doing a thing in the past while
> > > > > you're doing exactly the same right now?
> > > > >
> > > > > O.
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > Matt Hucke (hucke@), programmer.
> > > > > author, Graveyards of Illinois - http://graveyards. com/
> > > > > CYNICO.NET - hosting from $8.33/month; domains $13 - http://cynico. net/
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Huge savings on HDTVs from Dell.com!
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Gadget of the Year: Peek. Unlimited email on the go & no contracts.
>
>
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Windows Live™: Keep your life in sync.
> http://windowslive.com/explore?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_BR_life_in_synch_052009
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65840 From: Timothy or Stephen Gallagher Date: 2009-05-23
Subject: Re: procedural question
Salve Maria Caeca 

I am glad you asked
 
Fl. Galerius Aurelianus Tribunus Plebis said in part:

"When it was announced that the candidacy of Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus 
had been accepted by the proper authority, several of the Tribunes expected 
some immediate appeals from the People to pronounce intercession against it."
 
It would be nice to know it these "several ...Tribunes equaled at least three and if they believed that Modianus candidacy was illegal. If they did, the law expects them to act without being asked.
 
Tribunes do not act only when asked to do so. They also need to act if in their own opinion the constitution or laws are being violated. Even if only one Tibune felt the candidacy was illegal that one Tribune need to act
 
The Tribunes had a legal obligation to act.
 
 
"A. Since the Ius Auxili Ferendi is a fundamental prerogative of a Tribunus Plebis as set forth in IV. 7. A of our Constitution, in order for an act of intercessio to be valid the following procedure must be followed whether it is requested by a citizen or performed in his official capacity.

1. When a Tribunus Plebis issues an intercessio, it must include the following elements in a reasoned exposition in which the Tribunus shall note whether the auxilium was requested or ex-officio:
  • a. The official name(s) of the citizen(s) who has requested the Tribunus Plebis to issue the intercessio, or the official name(s) of the citizen(s) on whose behalf the Tribunus has provided auxilium ex officio.
  • b. The official name and office of the magistrate(s) against whose act or acts the intercessio or auxilium has been interposed.
  • c. The article(s) of the Constitution or the leges violated by the magistrate's act(s).
 
Vale
 
Tiberius Galerius Paulinus  


 

To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
From: shoshanahathaway@...
Date: Fri, 22 May 2009 23:16:15 -0400
Subject: [Nova-Roma] procedural question



Salvete Omnes,

A procedural question, if I may. Must the tribunes receive a r4equest,
either from a citizen or a magistrate to evaluate and pronounce on a legal
action, or can they act independently upon the published action, edict,
candidacy or proposed legislation?

Respectfully,
C. Maria Caeca


Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65841 From: C. Maria Caeca Date: 2009-05-23
Subject: Re: procedural question
Salve Censor, et salvete omnes,
 
I ask the indulgence of your patience while I clarify this in my own mind.  If the tribune(s) are acting ex officio. then in the necessary explication, item the tribune or tribunes would include the information that the action is ex officio, hence negating the need to address item 1a?
 
Thank you for your time,
 
C. Maria Caeca
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65842 From: Timothy or Stephen Gallagher Date: 2009-05-23
Subject: Re: procedural question
Salve Maria Caeca
 
Yes that is right. If they are acting on their own and not at the request of a citizen they would not need to include a citizens name, as required in 1a, but would indicate that the action was ex officio.
 
Vale
 
Tiberius Galerius Paulinus

 

To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
From: shoshanahathaway@...
Date: Sat, 23 May 2009 01:15:08 -0400
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] procedural question



Salve Censor, et salvete omnes,
 
I ask the indulgence of your patience while I clarify this in my own mind.  If the tribune(s) are acting ex officio. then in the necessary explication, item the tribune or tribunes would include the information that the action is ex officio, hence negating the need to address item 1a?
 
Thank you for your time,
 
C. Maria Caeca


Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65843 From: Q. Valerius Poplicola Date: 2009-05-23
Subject: Sulla's rebuttal - Re: Nova-Roma is my life (Was:The Cancer of Nova
I received my BA from a program with at most four people at one time, and each professor was expected to teach a multitude of classes. That's 2 introduction and 2 intermediate courses, and about 4-6 revolving upper division courses, Greek and Latin, which actually made the total number of classes for each 16-20.

Cheers,

Poplicola

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Jesse Corradino <woden66@...> wrote:
>
>
> Six to eight college classes at a time? That's laughable... What are the subjects in these "classes" pray tell? Yarn Observation? Pen Collecting? I'm a doctoral student in mathematics and have attended several schools and have never in my life encountered a single individual that teaches that many different classes; I'm fairly sure that this is impossible unless one teaches courses with the above fatuous topics.
>
>
>
> To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> From: PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@...
> Date: Fri, 22 May 2009 15:57:28 -0400
> Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Sulla's rebuttal - Re: Nova-Roma is my life (Was:The Cancer of Nova Roma)
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Sulla,
>
> Much like Germanicus and Drusus, your best days are behind you. All that is left are the bitter dregs of a once good vintage. I like fruit wine as much as the next man but when all that is left is sour crab apples and muscadines, it is time to give it up.
>
> Aureliane
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Robert Woolwine <l_cornelius_sulla@...>
> To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Thu, 21 May 2009 9:37 pm
> Subject: [Nova-Roma] Sulla's rebuttal - Re: Nova-Roma is my life (Was:The Cancer of Nova Roma)
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Vestal,
>
> Interesting post.
>
> NR is your life? Seriously? NR is your life? So what would happen if NR ceased to exist? Would the purpose of your life be snuffed out and you would have no reason to live?
>
> Is that point of view really healthy? This is a voluntary internet corporation and you place it with such importance that it is YOUR LIFE?
>
> I did find it interesting that you and I have more in common than I thought - in regards to suing former employers. One would think that given your experience you would have more respect for following the law.
>
> Overall an interesting post. Good luck with20your college education.
>
> And, respect and dignity are earned they are not freely given. This is not a dominate. I have taken oaths too. If we want to play the NR pointy hat comparison game I think my experience and time devoted to NR trumps yours. Having been Consul twice, Censor twice, Preator Urbanus, Quaestor, the first Nova Roman to complete the Cursus Honorum, the first Jewish Consul. First Nova Roman to complete the Lustrum of the Censorship. But, as Aurelianus says my absence for 4 years negates all that previous experience (see Aurelianus I jumped the gun on you). Nevertheless, NR is not the sum of my life. My family, my sister's family and my friends are just as important. As are my cats. As is my upcoming aliyah. The point is keeping a balance between REAL world and NR.
>
> Do you not think that I have received the positions and respect in my jobs without having integrity and respect? Do you think I would have been Consul twice without having integrity and respect? If I did not have those things I would not be the threat that TPTB think that I am. (Well that and my name). You're problem with me is that I am blunt, abrasive, conservative to the hilt, reconstructionist, emotional and extremely vocal. Despite all of those flaws I speak what I believe to be the truth and do so adamantly and will not cease to do so.
>
> Saying NR is your life sounds honestly, very RPGish to me. And, nice job trying to add words to my post - I am the LAST person to=2 0tell anyone that opinions do not count - You are obviously confusing me with the Praetors.
>
> Vale,
>
> Sulla
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, violetphearsen@ wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > You have no right to tell me, nor any other Nova Roman, that our opinions do not count. Every person here is entitled to his or her opinion, whether you like it or not.
> > You speak of material things. I speak of integrity and honesty.
> > If you are a man of such accomplishments as you claim, then why do you not treat others here in Nova Roma with dignity and respect? Here among us you act like a loud-mouth bully, throwing tantrums whenever you don't get your way. You always have. Those are not the actions of a distinguished and honorable man.
> > As always, Sulla, your actions belie your words.
> >
> > You want my CV, do you? All right.
> >
> >
> > I have, over the past seventeen years, developed my devotion to Vesta and to all the Gods and Goddesses of Roma. Then four and a half years ago, I discover Nova Roma. I spent about ten minutes reading everything on our website and then I applied for citizenship without any hesitation because I knew right then and there that Nova Roma was where I wanted to be for the rest of my life.
> >
> > When my citizenship was granted to me, I was so very happy, but that happiness did not last long. In my first month as a new citizen in Nova Roma, I became the target of a flame war aimed directly at me by the Boni, of which you were part of, over the topic of animal sacrifice. I was almost kicked out, but cooler heads prevailed. Despite this tumultous beginning, I stayed dedicated to Nova Roma, made some good friends and kept to my studies of the Religio Romana.
> >
> > After a year and a half, I submitted my application to join the College of Vestals. At the time, Nova Roma had just one Vestal, my friend, Lucia Modia Lupa. The happiest day I have ever experienced in Nova Roma was January 11, 2006 when Quintus Caecilius Metellus issued the Decreta Pontificum that announced that I was accepted as Sacerdos Vestalis. The saddest day in Nova Roma, for me, was when Lucia Modia Lupa had to retire as a Vestal, as her real life struggles to recover from the havoc Katrina had brought into her life took all her time and energy.
> >
> > Then changes began to be made and there was progress going on with the Collegium Pontificum, which admitted me as a member; and a time thereafter, I became the Virgo Maxima. That was the greatest honor I have ever received.
> >
> > Now, to become a Vestal in more than just name meant changing my life in big ways, from embracing celibacy and striving for chastity in thought, word and deed, to always speaking the truth or saying nothing at all, to prayin g twice daily to Vesta, to building my own special altar to hold a continuously lit candle, to learning how to start a fire by rubbing two sticks together, to creating rituals for the various festivals of the Roman calendar in which the ancient Vestals participated in, to building an outdoor hearth. All this while still dealing with real life problems that came with caring for elderly parents, maintaining a house and a full time job; and eventually, two jobs. Added to this was my involvement in a lawsuit against my former employer, who had unjustly fired me, along with fourteen other fellow employees, for reporting illegal practices the company was involved in. We won the lawsuit, but it took years.
> >
> > Even with all these changes, when I was made the Vestale Maxima, I felt I had to do more. I began working at creating a website to honor Vesta which I wanted to have not only a virtual Temple of Vesta, but a virtual Forum, too. A young woman who had once subscribed to the ML (but after witnessing flame war after flame war, she unsubscribed) offered to help me. We became good friends and she expressed a strong desire to serve Vesta, too.
> >
> > I had been very active in some local pagan groups and every chance I got, I brought up my new devotion to Vesta. From these groups came forth another young woman who told me she shared a strong desire to serve Vesta as well. I decided to open up my house to these two women and tr ain them as Vestals, passing on to them all I had learned in my studies and helping them to initiate studies of their own, and so they moved in with me.
> >
> > Then, through some real life changes that happened to all three of us, which included the passing away of my father, we moved to a house which came with a big fireplace and I had it converted into an indoor hearth. We brought the outdoor hearth built at the old house with us to the new house (and that was no easy feat). Now, with an indoor hearth, we could keep a small fire continuously lit, which we began doing on the first of this year. We have set up a schedule wherein we each take turns watching over the fire in shifts. We use the outdoor hearth for public rituals, of which we have had three so far, with a small group of pagan friends in attendance. Nothing big yet, but it's a start.
> >
> > I still have two jobs. One of my apprentices also has a full time job while the other is half way through college and has a part time job. Our ultimate goal is to one day move to Rome to live there permanently. However, I would like to built a Temple to Vesta here in the US. I have no idea if I will succeed in either of these goals, but I am determined and trying as best I can.
> >
> > I have no desire to attain high status in the world or to achieve fame or be given positions of authority or to accumulate vast amounts of wealth.20My goal in life is to serve Vesta, and all the Gods and Goddesses of Roma, and to bring to fruition our noble goal - to recreate the greatness that was Rome in our own respublica - Nova Roma. I have committed my life to it.
> >
> > And I will defend Nova Roma against any I perceive who threaten her present existence and future success. Nova Roma is here and now, already an actuality and growing every day. You may find all that I have said hard to understand, but that may be because this is not a game to me. Nova Roma is my life.
> >
> > Maxima Valeria Messallina
> > Sacerdos Vestalis
> >
> >
> > "Nihil apud Romanos Templo Vestae sanctius habetur."
> > "Among the Romans nothing is held more holy than the Temple of Vesta."
> >
> >
> >
> > --- On Thu, 5/21/09, Robert Woolwine <l_cornelius_sulla@> wrote:
> >
> >
> > From: Robert Woolwine <l_cornelius_sulla@>
> > Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: The Cancer of Nova Roma
> > To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> > Date: Thursday, May 21, 2009, 1:14 PM
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > LOL!!!!
> >
> > How awesome is this! This is almost as good as making Aurelianus (virtually) vomit.
> >
> > Let me educate you about me.
> >
> > In my 37 years of life I have been very pleased with w hat I have accomplished. I have two Masters Degrees (MBA and Education). I have a Bachelors Degree in Political Science and a Paralegal's Degree.
> >
> > Most of my 20s were spent in college.
> >
> > Over 4 years ago I moved to AZ, in that time I went from having nothing of value, living with my sister, after my apartment break-ins and the death of my kitten. In a dramatic two years I bought a home, purchased the furnishings of my home AND spend $20k on my dream vacation to Israel.
> >
> > I have positions of responsibility and authority in both of the jobs that I own. Comptroller of a construction company in Phoenix and a college professor. I am authorized to sign for contracts, waivers, accounting, payroll, benefits and am a notary public for the state of Arizona. I have passed checks and investigations. I have been the President of a conglomerate (Taurus Communications) .
> >
> > You might think I am a cancer, but I have been nominated for Who's Who in Phoenix. You might think I am a cancer, but I am responsible for running a multi-million dollar business. You might think I am a cancer, but I regularly teach 6-8 COLLEGE classes at a time.
> >
> > In other words, to say it politely, your opinion means nothing. Especially compared to what I have accomplished in my life.
> >
> > Now, Vestal, lets see your CV?
> >
> > Vale,
> >
> > Sulla
> >
> > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com, vi oletphearsen@ ... wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Do you not know what a metaphor is, Sulla? I shall explain it to you: "a figure of speech in which a term or phrase is applied to something to which it is not literally applicable in order to suggest a resemblance. "
> > > �
> > > You do indeed�resemble a creeping cancer eagerly tearing away at the very fabric of Nova Roma. By every word you write, you pollute the main list with vile and negativity. Your every act, or threatened action, creates a miasma of noxious fumes and the stench sickens all. Yes, like a cancer that once disappeared, you have returned again and your goal, it would seem, is to kill Nova Roma. Who else has threatened our Nova Roma with a lawsuit and parades email after email supposedly from an attorney general on this list, with no less an intention that to disband Nova Roma?
> > > Sulla, you are a sad specimen of a man.
> > > If you want to threaten me, insult me, make jokes at my expense, go right ahead. Please, continue to show all Nova Romans the true caliber of your person. Don't stop on my account.
> > > �
> > > Yes, Citizens, I am a Vestal and the Virgo Maxima, too. As such, I have sworn to always speak the truth and I have. This man engages in tactics of divisiveness, spewing animosity, displaying utter contemptuousness for any citizen, even the Virgo Maxima, for daring to tell the truth of what he really is. With his doublespeak, he tries to ensnare and mislead. Fortunately for us,�the Gods know what he really�is. You can pretend before men, Sulla, but Vesta knows the truth of my words.
> > > �
> > > Maxima Valeria Messallina
> > > Sacerdos Vestalis
> > > �
> > >
> > > --- On Thu, 5/21/09, Robert Woolwine <l_cornelius_ sulla@ > wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > From: Robert Woolwine <l_cornelius_ sulla@ >
> > > Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: All those who endorsed Modianus - Question for you?
> > > To: Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com
> > > Date: Thursday, May 21, 2009, 11:33 AM
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Better to be a cancer than a law breaker!
> > >
> > > Better to be a cancer than a friend of a law breaker
> > >
> > > Better to be a cancer than a friend to a neo-nazi and who appointed a neo-nazi to the Senate of Nova Roma!
> > >
> > > Better to be a cancer than a panderer.
> > >
> > > Better to be a cancer - than to show a complete lack of dignitas and judgement (azresident. mee.nu/warning) .
> > >
> > > And, this ladies and gentlemen is our Vestal! Are you a medical professional that has personally diagnosed me with some type of cancer that my Dr. has missed? Or is this just an opinion?
> > >
> > > Vale,
> > >
> > > Sulla
> > >
> > > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com, Maxima Valeria Messallina <violetphearsen@ ...> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > I said it before and I will say it again - Sulla is a cancer on Nova Roma.
> > > > �
> > > > �
> > > > Maxima Valeria Messallina
> > > > Sacerdos Vestalis
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --- On Thu, 5/21/09, PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@ ... <PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@ ...> wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > From: PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@ ... <PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@ ...>
> > > > Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: All those who endorsed Modianus - Question for you?
> > > > To: Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com
> > > > Date: Thursday, May 21, 2009, 8:04 AM
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > The opinion of someone who quit NR for nearly five years with no communication.
> > > > When he returned he posted numerous posts that were aggravating, insulting, and useless.
> > > > The first person in the history of NR to begin a lawsuit when he did not get his way.
> > > > Someone who contnues to use the threat of legal action to accomplish his goals; whatever the hell they are.
> > > > Someone who doesn't contribute to the Sacra et Religio but feels he is qualified to criticize the members of the�CP.
> > > > An empty wine sack full of fumes and dregs of better days.
> > > > Put them all together it spells S-U-L-L-A, a word that means excrement to me.
> > > >
> > > > Fl. Galerius Aurelianus
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Robert Woolwine <l_cornelius_ sulla@yahoo. com>
> > > > To: Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com
> > > > Sent: Wed, 20 May 2009 8:53 am
> > > > Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: All those who endorsed Modianus - Question for you?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > You know the answer to that, already.
> > > >
> > > > Xtian pontiffs.
> > > > near lawsuit before - most likely to happen again if Modianus because censor
> > > > Declining NR organization.
> > > > Magistrates and their subordinates who have no respect for the law
> > > >
> > > > Need I go on?
> > > >
> > > > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com, Matt Hucke <hucke@> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > >20Are you truly willing to join up with someone who has tried to create other
> > > > > > organizations that competed and tried to subvert Nova Roma? If so, why?
> > > > >
> > > > > Uh, you yourself are *currently* involved in an effort to create another
> > > > > organization that competes with Nova Roma.
> > > > >
> > > > > Not that there's anything wrong with that (I'm involved too, peripherally) .
> > > > >
> > > > > But how can you criticize someone else for doing a thing in the past while
> > > > > you're doing exactly the same right now?
> > > > >
> > > > > O.
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > Matt Hucke (hucke@), programmer.
> > > > > author, Graveyards of Illinois - http://graveyards. com/
> > > > > CYNICO.NET - hosting from $8.33/month; domains $13 - http://cynico. net/
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Huge savings on HDTVs from Dell.com!
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Gadget of the Year: Peek. Unlimited email on the go & no contracts.
>
>
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Windows Live™: Keep your life in sync.
> http://windowslive.com/explore?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_BR_life_in_synch_052009
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65844 From: Q. Valerius Poplicola Date: 2009-05-23
Subject: Re: [BackAlley] Re: (unknown)
Sorry, it was made partly in jest. Modianus would never take up such an
offer, therefore what incentive would Cato do the same? I'd vote for a ass
before I'd vote for Modianus (although a compelling argument via a famous
internet picture can be made that Modianus is an ass).

Poplicola

--------------------------------------------------
From: "Gaius Equitius Cato" <mlcinnyc@...>
Sent: Friday, May 22, 2009 10:43 PM
To: <BackAlley@yahoogroups.com>
Subject: [BackAlley] Re: (unknown)

> LOL no Poplicola posted this in the Forum
>
> --- In BackAlley@yahoogroups.com, Robert Woolwine <robert.woolwine@...>
> wrote:
>>
>> What did Modianus finally decide to follow the law?
>>
>> On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 8:27 PM, Gaius Equitius Cato <mlcinnyc@...>wrote:
>>
>> >
>> >
>> > Both Audens and Venator would be excellent censors.
>> >
>> > AUDENS OR VENATOR FOR CENSOR!
>> >
>> > ???
>> >
>> >
>> >
>>
>
>
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65845 From: D. Boyle Date: 2009-05-23
Subject: Re: 3 Reasons to Not Vote
Equestria Sullae sal.

You are confused. Nova Roma is not publicly traded on any stock
exchange. It is a small nonprofit organization incorporated in the
State of Maine. Our Annual Report only requires a listing of the
Board of Directors and Officers. It is a standard form which you
could have easily found with a minimum amount of research. This is
reviewed by me and forwarded to our Registered Agent. Our Registered
Agent reviews it and forwards it to the Secretary of State. The
Secretary of State reviews it and if everything is in order, accepts
it. Let me ask you, is everyone wrong and you right?

What exactly do you get out of constantly spreading misinformation?

Vale.


On May 22, 2009, at 1:17 PM, Robert Woolwine wrote:
> Actually,
>
> I can explain it. You want to know the difference between Congruence
> and compliance?
>
> Every year Nova Roma has to file an annual report (Title 13 Maine
> Not Profit Act Section B and Section C). Now, what does that mean?
> In the simplest base terms an annual report:
>
> An Annual report is a comprehensive report on a company's activities
> throughout the preceding year. Annual reports are intended to give
> shareholders and other interested persons information about the
> company's activities and financial performance. Most jurisdictions
> require companies to prepare and disclose annual reports, and many
> require the annual report to be filed at the company's registry.
> Companies listed on a stock exchange are also required to report at
> more frequent intervals (depending upon the rules of the stock
> exchange involved). (this is taken from Wikipediahttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Annual_report)
>
> An annual report generally consists of:
>
> Typically annual reports will include:
>
> * Chairman's report
> * CEO's report
> * Auditor's report on corporate governance
> * Mission statement
> * Corporate governance statement of compliance
> * Statement of directors' responsibilities
> * Invitation to the company's AGM
>
> as well as financial statements including:
>
> * Auditor's report on the financial statements
> * Balance sheet
> * Statement of retained earnings
> * Income statement
> * Cash flow statement
> * Notes to the financial statements
> * Accounting policies
> _____
>
> Now with that in mind - for $3.xx US anyone can download Nova Roma's
> annual report
>
> http://icrs.informe.org/nei-sos-icrs/ICRS?CorpSumm=20010268ND - just
> click LIST ALL FILING. It is public record.
>
> Now, when you spend the 3 bucks. What does our annual report say?
> Nothing of substance. What it does have is the address and legal
> names of each member of the board of directors.
>
> Letter from the Officers? Nope
> Letter from the CFO? Nope
> Accounting Information? Nope
> Mission Statement? Nope
> Corporate Governance and statement of compliance? Nope
> Financial Statements? Nope.
>
> So, the difference between Congruence and compliance - is simple. We
> have a report that we have to file with Maine - we call it an annual
> report - thought it has nothing of substance on it - and congruence
> is met. Compliance on the other hand? Well that is a different story.
>
> And, for those who automatically will not believe what I say - I
> challenge you - download the annual report and see for yourselves.
>
> Vale,
>
> Lucius Cornelius Sulla Felix
> Also an Accountant
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65846 From: marcushoratius Date: 2009-05-23
Subject: a. d. X Kalendas Iunias: TUBILUSTRIUM; Volcanus; dies Rosarium
M. Moravius Piscinus Horatianus Quiritibus cultoribus Deorum et omnibus salutem plurimam dicit: Deus Volcanus vos porrigat.

Hodie est ante diem X Kalendas Iunonias; haec dies nefastus piaculum est: TUBILUSTRIUM; feriae Volcano; dies Rosarium


Tubilustrium

As on 23 March, the Tubilustrium of 23 May was a purification of the tubae by which the Comitia Curiata was called to assemble in the comitia calata on the following day. This Comitia witnessed the proclamation of wills, and some forms of adoptions. The following day in March is marked Q. R. C. F. That is, Quando Rex comitiavit fas, Other comitia could not meet as tribunals until the Rex would dismiss the Comitia Curiata.


Festival of Volcanus and Maia

"Holy Vulcanus, foremost of those who cherish this place, to You we pray for peace. Grant Your ultimate assistance to the tired and worn, and, if no one here merits punishment for some noxious crime, may You have mercy on all their souls and allow them to reach Your purifying fountains. Three times they invoke Your name, three times they pour rich incense upon the focal fire, and strewn the altar with auspicious boughs in Your honour." ~ Grattius Faliscus, Cynegetica 437-442

"Soon, I pray, Vulcan, memories of whispered rumors of disgrace and loud quarrels of complaint You will no longer hold against the children of Mars; we are also the children of Your sweet wife Venus, spare us, Father." ~ Marcus Valerius Martialis, Epigrammata 5.7.5

"Why did Romulus build a temple of Volcanus outside the City? Was it in consequence of Volcanus' fabled jealousy of Mars because of Venus that Romulus, the reputed son of Mars, did not give Volcanus a share in his home or City? Or is this a foolish explanation, and was the temple originally built as a secret place of assembly and council chamber for himself and his colleague Tatius,that here they might convene with senators and take counsel concerning public affairs in quiet without being disturbed? Or was it that since Rome, from the very beginning, has been in great danger from conflagrations, they decided to show honor to this God, but to place His temple outside the City?" ~ Plutarch, Roman Questions 47

In Greek myth Hephaestus was married to Aphrodite. Maia was a nymph identified with the largest star among the Pleiades as the rising of that group of stars in spring signified rain. And Maia was said to be the mother of Hernes by Zeus. Among the Romans Maia is instead associated with Volcanus. She is an Earth Goddess related to the Bona Dea. On 1 May sacrifices were offered to Maia, and to the Bona Dea by the flamen Volcanalis. Originally Volcanus was probably a Latin version of Italic Vertumnus, who was later reintroduced. Volcanus was thus the God of inner warmth that 'ripened' the Earth Mother in spring in the same way that we'll later see Vertumnus 'ripen' Flora. As Cicero said, there are numerous deities but only a few names found in the Libri Pontifici for them all. The layers upon layers of Roman polytheism, although confusing at times, also explains some of these divers entries about the Gods.


AUC 690 / 63 BCE: Pompeius Magnus takes Jerusalem


Dies Rosarium

On this day wreathes of roses were laid as offerings on the tombs and monuments of the Manes that, like the Temple of Volcanus, lay outside the City of Rome.


Our thought for today is from Sextus, 10:

"God, indeed, is not in want of anything, but the wise man is in want of God alone. He, therefore, who is in want but of few things, and those necessary, emulates Him who is in want of nothing."
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65847 From: D. Boyle Date: 2009-05-23
Subject: Re: Sulla's Teaching Skills
Equestria Sullae sal.

That is a remarkably diverse mix of classes and quite impressive. You
must have at least a few degrees and certificates (PhD, MBA, CPA,
etc.) especially to be a confirmed full-time faculty in this job market.

Vale.



On May 23, 2009, at 12:23 AM, Robert Woolwine wrote:
> Ave,
>
> I have been teaching college for over 3 years - and was confirmed
> full time faculty.
>
> You basically want a list of classes I teach? Sure here you go:
>
> Foundations of Business
> Critical Thinking
> Cultural Diversity
> Skills in an Information Age
> Introduction to World Cultures and Social Environments
> Supervision and Leadership
> Organizational Theory and Behavior
> Political, Legal and Ethical Environments of Business
> Introduction to Marketing
> Financial Accounting 1
>
> This are the classes I have been approved to teach. I, on average
> teach between 6-8 classes at a time.
>
> This job paid for my trip to Israel. Nice try whoever you are.
>
> Vale,
>
> Sulla
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65848 From: Robert Levee Date: 2009-05-23
Subject: Re: 3 Reasons to Not Vote
So now we are a company?And are we all stockholders.Would that be common or preferred?Who is our CEO?What renumeration does she/he recieve?

--- On Sat, 5/23/09, D. Boyle <deandreaboyle@...> wrote:

> From: D. Boyle <deandreaboyle@...>
> Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: 3 Reasons to Not Vote
> To: "Nova Roma" <Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com>
> Date: Saturday, May 23, 2009, 5:23 AM
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Equestria Sullae sal.
>
>
>
> You are confused. Nova Roma is not publicly traded on any
> stock
>
> exchange. It is a small nonprofit organization
> incorporated in the
>
> State of Maine. Our Annual Report only requires a listing
> of the
>
> Board of Directors and Officers. It is a standard form
> which you
>
> could have easily found with a minimum amount of research.
> This is
>
> reviewed by me and forwarded to our Registered Agent. Our
> Registered
>
> Agent reviews it and forwards it to the Secretary of State.
> The
>
> Secretary of State reviews it and if everything is in
> order, accepts
>
> it. Let me ask you, is everyone wrong and you right?
>
>
>
> What exactly do you get out of constantly spreading
> misinformation?
>
>
>
> Vale.
>
>
>
> On May 22, 2009, at 1:17 PM, Robert Woolwine wrote:
>
> > Actually,
>
> >
>
> > I can explain it. You want to know the difference
> between Congruence
>
> > and compliance?
>
> >
>
> > Every year Nova Roma has to file an annual report
> (Title 13 Maine
>
> > Not Profit Act Section B and Section C). Now, what
> does that mean?
>
> > In the simplest base terms an annual report:
>
> >
>
> > An Annual report is a comprehensive report on a
> company's activities
>
> > throughout the preceding year. Annual reports are
> intended to give
>
> > shareholders and other interested persons information
> about the
>
> > company's activities and financial performance.
> Most jurisdictions
>
> > require companies to prepare and disclose annual
> reports, and many
>
> > require the annual report to be filed at the
> company's registry.
>
> > Companies listed on a stock exchange are also required
> to report at
>
> > more frequent intervals (depending upon the rules of
> the stock
>
> > exchange involved). (this is taken from Wikipediahttp: //en.wikipedia. org/wiki/
> Annual_report)
>
> >
>
> > An annual report generally consists of:
>
> >
>
> > Typically annual reports will include:
>
> >
>
> > * Chairman's report
>
> > * CEO's report
>
> > * Auditor's report on corporate governance
>
> > * Mission statement
>
> > * Corporate governance statement of compliance
>
> > * Statement of directors' responsibilities
>
> > * Invitation to the company's AGM
>
> >
>
> > as well as financial statements including:
>
> >
>
> > * Auditor's report on the financial statements
>
> > * Balance sheet
>
> > * Statement of retained earnings
>
> > * Income statement
>
> > * Cash flow statement
>
> > * Notes to the financial statements
>
> > * Accounting policies
>
> > _____
>
> >
>
> > Now with that in mind - for $3.xx US anyone can
> download Nova Roma's
>
> > annual report
>
> >
>
> > http://icrs.
> informe.org/ nei-sos-icrs/ ICRS?CorpSumm= 20010268ND -
> just
>
> > click LIST ALL FILING. It is public record.
>
> >
>
> > Now, when you spend the 3 bucks. What does our annual
> report say?
>
> > Nothing of substance. What it does have is the address
> and legal
>
> > names of each member of the board of directors.
>
> >
>
> > Letter from the Officers? Nope
>
> > Letter from the CFO? Nope
>
> > Accounting Information? Nope
>
> > Mission Statement? Nope
>
> > Corporate Governance and statement of compliance?
> Nope
>
> > Financial Statements? Nope.
>
> >
>
> > So, the difference between Congruence and compliance -
> is simple. We
>
> > have a report that we have to file with Maine - we
> call it an annual
>
> > report - thought it has nothing of substance on it -
> and congruence
>
> > is met. Compliance on the other hand? Well that is a
> different story.
>
> >
>
> > And, for those who automatically will not believe what
> I say - I
>
> > challenge you - download the annual report and see for
> yourselves.
>
> >
>
> > Vale,
>
> >
>
> > Lucius Cornelius Sulla Felix
>
> > Also an Accountant
>
> >
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65849 From: David Kling Date: 2009-05-23
Subject: Re: Sulla's rebuttal - Re: Nova-Roma is my life (Was:The Cancer of N
I have a friend who teaches philosophy at a community college and adjuncts at another college.  Between the two he teaches probably 5 courses a quarter; however, at the two institutions I'm most familiar with tenured faculty teach no more than 3 courses a quarter/semester and typically only teach 2 at a time.  At the school I am at now it alternates one semester 2 courses and then in the following 3.  I too am baffled by the idea of teaching 6 to 8 courses at a time.  How can a single person teach that much/often and still work someplace else.  I suppose if some of those were taught on-line you could teach that many.  Also, I've never considered the faculty at institutions I've been a student "professors" unless they were doctorate possessing tenured faculty; those with masters degrees teaching I've always considered instructors.  Not that I give any more or less respect, it does remain an issue of academic status.

Valete;

Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus

On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 10:53 PM, Jesse Corradino <woden66@...> wrote:


Six to eight college classes at a time?  That's laughable...  What are the subjects in these "classes" pray tell?  Yarn Observation?  Pen Collecting?  I'm a doctoral student in mathematics and have attended several schools and have never in my life encountered a single individual that teaches that many different classes; I'm fairly sure that this is impossible unless one teaches courses with the above fatuous topics.




Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65850 From: David Kling Date: 2009-05-23
Subject: Re: [BackAlley] Re: (unknown)
Always a bundle of joy and pleasantries.  I am so glad I don't live in your gloomy and depressive world.

Vale;

Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus

On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 12:20 AM, Q. Valerius Poplicola <q.valerius.poplicola@...> wrote:


Sorry, it was made partly in jest. Modianus would never take up such an
offer, therefore what incentive would Cato do the same? I'd vote for a ass
before I'd vote for Modianus (although a compelling argument via a famous
internet picture can be made that Modianus is an ass).

Poplicola




Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65851 From: deciusiunius Date: 2009-05-23
Subject: Re: Re Modianus: a candidacy of certain legality.
--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Roger" <politicog@...> wrote:
>
> So, in other words, it's like every election in NR since the >beginning of time. :)

Pretty much, yeah. :-) There's a bit more of a cloud than usual because of the divisive nature of the two candidates but you're right, it's business as usual.

Palladius
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65852 From: Publius Ullerius Stephanus Venator Date: 2009-05-23
Subject: Nova Roman Statesmen, was Re: Candidacy - Opinion of . . .
Salve et salvete;

On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 7:30 PM, Q. Valerius Poplicola wrote:
>
> Both Audens and Venator would be excellent censors.
>
> AUDENS OR VENATOR FOR CENSOR!
>

Thank you for thinking so highly of me. Save for occasional lapses in
my verbiage (and ability to participate due to personal circumstance),
I have tried hard to uphold the Virtues both Civic and Private, and to
further the building of Nova Roma.

For myself, I must demur, and beg off consideration at this time, or
in the foreseeable future; having neither the time nor talent that
this office deserves.

M Minucius Audens would have my support, if he is so inclined.

As I have written before, I stay with Nova Roma because the goal is
worthy of pursuit and will help as circumstance allows.

To my subject line. . .Roma Antiqua was known for her politicians, and
for her Statesmen.

Nova Roma is awash in politicians; who amongst us, could be considered
(man or woman) as a Statesman by a wide variety of folks herein?

Think, please, who has worked long and hard. Who has not engaged in
the "more energetic" debates. Who has done their best to advance the
creation of our culture? Think both inside and outside the realm of
our governance.

. . .and, I am not necessarily looking for on-list replies, just
asking that my fellow cives take a good look around, and think.

Again, I recuse myself from consideration, but am grateful that many
have expressed positive opinions about me in the past.

=====================================
In amicitia et fide
Publius Ullerius Stephanus Venator
Civis circa Quintilis MMDCCLI a.u.c.
Poeta, Coquuor et Cerevisiae Coctor

(all sites subject to sporadic updates =)
http://www.myspace.com/venator_poetus
http://anheathenreader.blogspot.com/
http://www.catamount-grange-hearth.org/
http://www.cafepress.com/catamountgrange
--
May the Holy Powers smile on our efforts.
May the Spirits of our family lines nod in approval.
May we be of Worth to our fellow Nova Romans.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65853 From: deciusiunius Date: 2009-05-23
Subject: Re: Candidacy!
--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "L Julia Aquila" <dis_pensible@...> wrote:
>
> Salve Palladio,


Salve Iulia,

BTW, it's Palladi if you're addressing me in the vocative.
>
> > I was pointing out for you the absurdity in the connection you made >between Aurelianus' an appointment as scriba and Aurelianus' posting >in favor of Paulinus' position, as if the offer of a this position >could influence anyone to do anything.
>
> I repeat: You should take a course in logic although you may be very well defying logic in a very poor effort to discredit my sound enquiry.

Your repetition makes no more sense than it did the first time. Why you think I should try to discredit your "inquiry" is beyond me. I was trying to get you lighten up and see the humor here. All of us would get along better if we didn't take ourselves quite so seriously.

> > Now that you mention it though, diribitor is supposed to be a non->political position whose job is to be objective and count votes. >Taking partisan positions might call that into question and you >should avoid them. Just friendly advice.
>
> I did not mention it, you did.
> Doesn't sound very friendly.
> You appear to be threatening me Senator Palladius.

Lighten up, if that is possible, please. Damned email blows things all out of proportion. Are you able to have a conversation without going to the extremes? I am not "threatening" you. What "threat" could I possibly make? This is a mailing list for Gods' sake. I apologize if you think that is the case.

> It appears just like a threat designed to instill fear to keep >citizens from expressing her/his opinions.

Instill fear???? Please keep things in perspective. You scare easily if reading an email about Nova Roman politics can possibly scare you. Hit the delete button if something scares you.

> It also sounds like an insult to citizens of the respublica when >you infer a citizen cannot vote or campaign for the candidate they >choose based on their own independent thought processes yet hold a >non-partisan, non-political position.

Ideally that is true, when you are diribitor you should not. When I was custos I studiously avoided making partisan statements, that's the nature of these positions (it's also why you can't run for office until 2010). It's like a moderator at a town meeting or a justice of the peace who counts votes (examples from the macro world); anyone anywhere who handles ballots has to avoid overt signs of partisanship, it's the nature of the beast.

> You also demonstrate that you have no confidence in our voting >process; a process you, Senator, were instrumental in implementing.

I'll only accept partial blame. :-) It's been a long time since I held any position that had any influence over our system. It has changed over the years.

Vale,

Palladius
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65854 From: deciusiunius Date: 2009-05-23
Subject: Re: Candidacy - Opinion of Fl. Galerius Aurelianus Tribunus Plebis
--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Gaius Equitius Cato" <mlcinnyc@...> wrote:
>
> Cato Fabio Maximo Galerio Aureliano SPD


Salve Cato,


> So you're saying that because one candidate is disliked by some and >the other candidate is violating the law by his candidacy, the >election itself should be voided - contrary to the law? The consuls >do not have the power to cancel an election because they - or anyone >- may not personally like what may be the only valid candidate.

Yes, if they wished they could cancel the election and start over by virtue of their imperium. Once the election is over they couldn't but right now, yeah, they could pull the election if they wanted.

I see nothing that could prevent that legally. Do you?

Vale,

Palladius
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65855 From: politicog Date: 2009-05-23
Subject: Re: Candidacy - Opinion of Fl. Galerius Aurelianus Tribunus Plebis
I believe that the following are possible:

1. The issuing Consul could withdraw the edict.

2. The issuing Consul's colleague in the Consulship could veto the edict.

3. Both candidates could withdraw, thus allowing the Consuls to call a new election.

4. Asuming Contio has not yet begun, or is not yet over, a Tribune could issue an edict cancelling the entire election, or any candidacy therein, but this is allowable only during Contio, and only effective if a majority of the Tribunes agree.

5. One of the Comitia could pass a lex revoking magisterial edicts regarding the election. I just sent a message a few minutes ago (using the Yahoo Groups website, rather than my e-mail client), that proposes this method to do precisely that. I got a message on the site that it was "awaiting approval". Hopefully it will be posted soon. Of course, this would have to be done before the election is held, because were it to pass after an election, it would then an invalid "ex post facto" lex.


Lucius Quintis Constantius




--- On Sat, 5/23/09, deciusiunius <bcatfd@...> wrote:

> From: deciusiunius <bcatfd@...>
> Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Candidacy - Opinion of Fl. Galerius Aurelianus Tribunus Plebis
> To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> Date: Saturday, May 23, 2009, 10:29 AM
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com,
> "Gaius Equitius Cato" <mlcinnyc@...> wrote:
> >
> > Cato Fabio Maximo Galerio Aureliano SPD
>
>
> Salve Cato,
>
>
> > So you're saying that because one candidate is
> disliked by some and >the other candidate is violating
> the law by his candidacy, the >election itself should be
> voided - contrary to the law? The consuls >do not have
> the power to cancel an election because they - or anyone
> >- may not personally like what may be the only valid
> candidate.
>
> Yes, if they wished they could cancel the election and
> start over by virtue of their imperium. Once the election is
> over they couldn't but right now, yeah, they could pull the
> election if they wanted.
>
> I see nothing that could prevent that legally. Do you?
>
> Vale,
>
> Palladius
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>     mailto:Nova-Roma-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com
>
>
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65856 From: Jesse Corradino Date: 2009-05-23
Subject: Re: Sulla's rebuttal - Re: Nova-Roma is my life (Was:The Cancer of
Apparently listing the imaginary courses he teaches demonstrates that he teaches eight classes simultaneously.  Also, don't forget that mentioning a trip he took to Israel also should convince you that this impossible thing happens; I mean, if he says it happened, then I guess that erases any doubt!  QED? 
 
Still, I guess emailing people photos of yarn for his Yarn 101 section online would allow him to cut down to seven classes-a schedule managable enough to actually still have time to run several corporate conglomerates-as you point out below.  I'm just coming from the point of view of a difficult subject like mathematics where the professors cannot spread themselves thinner than cellophane so that they can get a check for whatever.  That's why I find this claim so incredible.  
 

To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
From: tau.athanasios@...
Date: Sat, 23 May 2009 08:53:23 -0400
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Sulla's rebuttal - Re: Nova-Roma is my life (Was:The Cancer of Nova Roma)



I have a friend who teaches philosophy at a community college and adjuncts at another college.  Between the two he teaches probably 5 courses a quarter; however, at the two institutions I'm most familiar with tenured faculty teach no more than 3 courses a quarter/semester and typically only teach 2 at a time.  At the school I am at now it alternates one semester 2 courses and then in the following 3.  I too am baffled by the idea of teaching 6 to 8 courses at a time.  How can a single person teach that much/often and still work someplace else.  I suppose if some of those were taught on-line you could teach that many.  Also, I've never considered the faculty at institutions I've been a student "professors" unless they were doctorate possessing tenured faculty; those with masters degrees teaching I've always considered instructors.  Not that I give any more or less respect, it does remain an issue of academic status.

Valete;

Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus

On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 10:53 PM, Jesse Corradino <woden66@...> wrote:


Six to eight college classes at a time?  That's laughable...  What are the subjects in these "classes" pray tell?  Yarn Observation?  Pen Collecting?  I'm a doctoral student in mathematics and have attended several schools and have never in my life encountered a single individual that teaches that many different classes; I'm fairly sure that this is impossible unless one teaches courses with the above fatuous topics.







Windows Liveâ„¢: Keep your life in sync. Check it out.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65857 From: Roger Date: 2009-05-23
Subject: Open Letter to the Praetors: Possible Solution for Election Mess
Considering the issues raised in the current debate on the Censor Suffectus election mess, I propose a possible solution to the issue.

I ask one of the Praetors to call the Comitia Centuriata to consider the proposed lex below. This proposed lex would do the following: revoke the edict calling for candidates for Censor Suffectus and all proceedings held under its authority, i.e. both candidacies are void. It then instructs the Consuls to issue a new edict for the Censor Suffectus election, and requires such an edict to be issued within 72 hours of the approval of the proposed lex. Should the Consuls fail or refuse to do so within the required period, then the Consuls are considered to fall within the meaning of "derelict in his duties" in the NR Constitution, and the office of both Consuls declared vacant. Finally, only in the event of the consulship being declared vacant, the Senate is then instructed to immediately appoint an interrex in the terms of the Constitution, who has the authority to call new elections for the Consulship.

I have no axe to grind against the current Consuls. However, a lex that only proposes something but does not provide penalties, is ineffective. I presume that in the event of this lex being proposed and passed, the Consuls will undoubtedly do their duties and issue the new edictum. However, in case, for whatever reason, that doesn't happen, this lex would then provide the remedy, by declaring the consulship vacant on its own terms, without the necessity of calling the Comitia again.

The reason that I am asking the Praetors to convene the Comiata Centuriata is because this lex expressly deals with the duties of the Consuls and issues instructions to them. Since this could be considered conflict of interest, in the interest of the impartiality of proceedings, then the Praetors should preside over the Comitia during the discussion and vote on this item.

This lex does not directly address the issue of the legality of the candidacies. That is also an issue that needs to be made clear in the law. However, this lex would let us start the process all over again. While we are doing so, I would advise convening magistrates that they should consider proposals to clarify the meaning of "consecutive" in operative legislation.

I think in the current climate, the election of either current candidate is likely to lead to disaster. If we follow this method that I propose, the People will decide the issue before proceeding to the election. If they think it is o.k. to proceed as is, vote against this proposed lex, if they think we need a do-over, vote for it.

My understanding of the naming conventions of the leges in Nova Roma is admittedly deficient. Therefore, I have not given a name to this lex, but appreciate anyone that can give it an appropriate name.


Lucius Quintius Constantius


Proposed new lex:

[Insert name of lex]

1. The Consular Call for candidates for the office of Censor Suffectus, to supply the vacancy caused by the resignation of former Censor Gaius Popillius Laenas, issued by Consul Marcus Curiatius Complutensis, on ante diem X Kal. Mai, A.U.C. MMDCCLXII, in the consulship of Marcus Curiatus Complutensis and Marcus Iulius Severus, is hereby revoked and all proceedings held thereunder are hereby declared null and void.

2. The Consuls are hereby instructed to issue a new edictum calling for qualified candidates for the office of Censor Suffectus for the term ending December 31, MMDCCLXIII, to fill the vacancy caused by the reignation of former Censor Gaius Popillius Laenas.

3. The edictum referred to in paragraph 2 shall be issued within 72 hours of the approval of this lex.

4. If the edictum referred to in paragraph 3 is not issued within the time specified, the consuls are considered to have met the standard of "derelict in his duties" in IV.A. of the Constitution of Nova Roma, and the office of both Consuls is declared vacant.

5. Only if the terms in paragraph 4 are operative, the Senate is instructed to immediately select an interrex in the terms of the provisions of IV.B.2. of the Constitution of Nova Roma.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65858 From: David Kling Date: 2009-05-23
Subject: Re: Open Letter to the Praetors: Possible Solution for Election Mess
Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus S.P.D.

From the constitution:

To call the Senate, the comitia centuriata, and the comitia populi tributa to order when the Consuls are unavailable;

--

Praetores can convene the senate and comitia to order "when the Consuls are unavailable."  They are available; therefore, the praetores cannot convene the Comitia Centuriate.

Valete:

Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus

On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 10:04 AM, Roger <politicog@...> wrote:


Considering the issues raised in the current debate on the Censor Suffectus election mess, I propose a possible solution to the issue.

I ask one of the Praetors to call the Comitia Centuriata to consider the proposed lex below. This proposed lex would do the following: revoke the edict calling for candidates for Censor Suffectus and all proceedings held under its authority, i.e. both candidacies are void. It then instructs the Consuls to issue a new edict for the Censor Suffectus election, and requires such an edict to be issued within 72 hours of the approval of the proposed lex. Should the Consuls fail or refuse to do so within the required period, then the Consuls are considered to fall within the meaning of "derelict in his duties" in the NR Constitution, and the office of both Consuls declared vacant. Finally, only in the event of the consulship being declared vacant, the Senate is then instructed to immediately appoint an interrex in the terms of the Constitution, who has the authority to call new elections for the Consulship. 




Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65859 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2009-05-23
Subject: Re: Candidacy - Opinion of Fl. Galerius Aurelianus Tribunus Plebis
Cato Palladio sal.

Salve!

Yes, of course I do. It would violate the law. An election has been called and at least one viable candidate has declared.

There is no legally-sound reason why an election cannot be held. There seems to be the prevalent feeling that "emotional" is equivalent to "reasonable" or "legal". This is not the case.

Consular imperium does not override the law dictating when elections must be held to fill vacancies in an office.

Vale!

Cato



--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "deciusiunius" <bcatfd@...> wrote:
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Gaius Equitius Cato" <mlcinnyc@> wrote:
> >
> > Cato Fabio Maximo Galerio Aureliano SPD
>
>
> Salve Cato,
>
>
> > So you're saying that because one candidate is disliked by some and >the other candidate is violating the law by his candidacy, the >election itself should be voided - contrary to the law? The consuls >do not have the power to cancel an election because they - or anyone >- may not personally like what may be the only valid candidate.
>
> Yes, if they wished they could cancel the election and start over by virtue of their imperium. Once the election is over they couldn't but right now, yeah, they could pull the election if they wanted.
>
> I see nothing that could prevent that legally. Do you?
>
> Vale,
>
> Palladius
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65860 From: D. Boyle Date: 2009-05-23
Subject: Re: Open Letter to the Praetors: NO Election Mess
Equestria Iunia Laeca L. Quintio Constantio sal.

There is no election mess. We have two perfectly legal candidates for
Censor Suffectus. The Tribunes, Consuls, and Praetors have all
validated this. Now, the power has been given to the people to decide.

Vale.



On May 23, 2009, at 10:04 AM, Roger wrote:
> Considering the issues raised in the current debate on the Censor
> Suffectus election mess
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65861 From: L Julia Aquila Date: 2009-05-23
Subject: Re: Candidacy!
Salve Pallidio,

The back alley bunch always looks for little things. Thank you for the correction but I addressed you in the dative, not vocative, which is correct after "Salve". I've actually had a few courses in Latin, not to mention making continual *enquiries* of the Magistra and others as to Latin form. I have long understood that continual education is imperative. Now either enquiry or inquiry is correct of course you and yours will probably launch an inquisition into one word...have at it. I won't play. However, by starting this game you and your friends may become privy to numerous spelling and usage corrections and the worse offenders are those who brag about their educations but their statements are punctuated with spelling errors. Or those who take a simple concept and compose a five or six paragraph legal composition when it could be done in a quarter of that length. This also strikes me funny because you and your friends have the nerve to call others bureaucrats. Put that in the double standard dictionary.
Now this is funny!*laugh*
One point you do not seem to understand. I belong to no party and have made no partisan statements. Particularly in this thread. Quite frankly you and your friends from the back alley demonstrate behavior of bullies.
I do not plan to run for any candidacy in 2010 or at anytime.
Words are powerful no matter how you like to downplay them.

I have my answer and believe Appius Galerius Aurelianus to be an honorable man.
There is no more need for me to engage in anymore discourse in this thread.

Vale
Julia
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65862 From: Titus Flavius Aquila Date: 2009-05-23
Subject: Both candidates for Censor Suffectus are valid candidates (AW: [Nova
Salvete Quirites,
 
even if I am currently in a health resort, due to my health conditions, I can not refrain from making my statement here
on this request brought forward by Lucius Quintius Constantius.
 
There is no need for such an request .
 
Both candidates are valid to run for the Censor Suffectus position !
 
Let the citizens of Nova Roma vote on both candidates !
 
Whoever will win the election will be be the legal Censor Suffectus and has my support.
 
Personally I endorse and ask my friends to vote for Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus as Censor Suffectus
 
Optime valete
Titus Flavius Aquila


Von: Roger <politicog@...>
An: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Gesendet: Samstag, den 23. Mai 2009, 16:04:08 Uhr
Betreff: [Nova-Roma] Open Letter to the Praetors: Possible Solution for Election Mess

Considering the issues raised in the current debate on the Censor Suffectus election mess, I propose a possible solution to the issue.

I ask one of the Praetors to call the Comitia Centuriata to consider the proposed lex below. This proposed lex would do the following: revoke the edict calling for candidates for Censor Suffectus and all proceedings held under its authority, i.e. both candidacies are void. It then instructs the Consuls to issue a new edict for the Censor Suffectus election, and requires such an edict to be issued within 72 hours of the approval of the proposed lex. Should the Consuls fail or refuse to do so within the required period, then the Consuls are considered to fall within the meaning of "derelict in his duties" in the NR Constitution, and the office of both Consuls declared vacant. Finally, only in the event of the consulship being declared vacant, the Senate is then instructed to immediately appoint an interrex in the terms of the Constitution, who has the authority to call new elections for the Consulship.

I have no axe to grind against the current Consuls. However, a lex that only proposes something but does not provide penalties, is ineffective. I presume that in the event of this lex being proposed and passed, the Consuls will undoubtedly do their duties and issue the new edictum. However, in case, for whatever reason, that doesn't happen, this lex would then provide the remedy, by declaring the consulship vacant on its own terms, without the necessity of calling the Comitia again.

The reason that I am asking the Praetors to convene the Comiata Centuriata is because this lex expressly deals with the duties of the Consuls and issues instructions to them. Since this could be considered conflict of interest, in the interest of the impartiality of proceedings, then the Praetors should preside over the Comitia during the discussion and vote on this item.

This lex does not directly address the issue of the legality of the candidacies. That is also an issue that needs to be made clear in the law. However, this lex would let us start the process all over again. While we are doing so, I would advise convening magistrates that they should consider proposals to clarify the meaning of "consecutive" in operative legislation.

I think in the current climate, the election of either current candidate is likely to lead to disaster. If we follow this method that I propose, the People will decide the issue before proceeding to the election. If they think it is o.k. to proceed as is, vote against this proposed lex, if they think we need a do-over, vote for it.

My understanding of the naming conventions of the leges in Nova Roma is admittedly deficient. Therefore, I have not given a name to this lex, but appreciate anyone that can give it an appropriate name.


Lucius Quintius Constantius

Proposed new lex:

[Insert name of lex]

1. The Consular Call for candidates for the office of Censor Suffectus, to supply the vacancy caused by the resignation of former Censor Gaius Popillius Laenas, issued by Consul Marcus Curiatius Complutensis, on ante diem X Kal. Mai, A.U.C. MMDCCLXII, in the consulship of Marcus Curiatus Complutensis and Marcus Iulius Severus, is hereby revoked and all proceedings held thereunder are hereby declared null and void.

2. The Consuls are hereby instructed to issue a new edictum calling for qualified candidates for the office of Censor Suffectus for the term ending December 31, MMDCCLXIII, to fill the vacancy caused by the reignation of former Censor Gaius Popillius Laenas.

3. The edictum referred to in paragraph 2 shall be issued within 72 hours of the approval of this lex.

4. If the edictum referred to in paragraph 3 is not issued within the time specified, the consuls are considered to have met the standard of "derelict in his duties" in IV.A. of the Constitution of Nova Roma, and the office of both Consuls is declared vacant.

5. Only if the terms in paragraph 4 are operative, the Senate is instructed to immediately select an interrex in the terms of the provisions of IV.B.2. of the Constitution of Nova Roma.



Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65864 From: Roger Date: 2009-05-23
Subject: Re: Open Letter to the Praetors: NO Election Mess
So has Contio closed and the election begun? I may have missed the message stating that. If Contio has closed, then I will withdraw my request to the Praetors for the proposed lex.

If it has closed, could someone please give me the message number. Thanks.

If it has not closed, then the election has not yet started, and it not *yet* in the hands of the people. The whole purpose of using this as a proposed solution, is that is allows the whole NR citizenship to decide whether or not the election in valid.


Lucius Quintius Constantius



--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "D. Boyle" <deandreaboyle@...> wrote:
>
> Equestria Iunia Laeca L. Quintio Constantio sal.
>
> There is no election mess. We have two perfectly legal candidates for
> Censor Suffectus. The Tribunes, Consuls, and Praetors have all
> validated this. Now, the power has been given to the people to decide.
>
> Vale.
>
>
>
> On May 23, 2009, at 10:04 AM, Roger wrote:
> > Considering the issues raised in the current debate on the Censor
> > Suffectus election mess
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65865 From: L Julia Aquila Date: 2009-05-23
Subject: Re: Classic Poetry, Prose, Proems
Salvete Omnes,

This hour's selection is from Martialis' Epigrams BK V:
LI. ON A PRETEND LAWYER.
That person yonder, who has his left arm heavily laden with manuscripts, who is closely pressed by a beardless band of short-hand writers, who fixes a grave look on papers and letters, which people bring him from various quarters, assuming a demeanour like that of Cato, or Cicero, or Brutus, that person, I say, Rufus, even should torture try to compel him, cannot properly utter "good morning," either in Latin or in Greek. If you think I am joking, let us go and address him.

Valete,
Julia

P.S. Thank you Magistra for your contribution to this thread;)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65866 From: David Kling Date: 2009-05-23
Subject: Re: Open Letter to the Praetors: NO Election Mess
Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus Lucio Quntio Constantio salutem dicit

The call of the comitia occurred several days ago.  I was the augur consulted to take the auspices for the comitia call, and the call lists the dates of the contio and the time for elections.  A new edict would be necessary, to my knowledge, to modify the edict that called for the comitia -- and a new augury performed.

Vale;

Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus

On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 11:56 AM, Roger <politicog@...> wrote:



So has Contio closed and the election begun? I may have missed the message stating that. If Contio has closed, then I will withdraw my request to the Praetors for the proposed lex.

If it has closed, could someone please give me the message number. Thanks.

If it has not closed, then the election has not yet started, and it not *yet* in the hands of the people. The whole purpose of using this as a proposed solution, is that is allows the whole NR citizenship to decide whether or not the election in valid.

Lucius Quintius Constantius


Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65867 From: D. Boyle Date: 2009-05-23
Subject: Re: Open Letter to the Praetors: NO Election Mess
Equestria sal.

No, Contio has not closed. Though there is no one left to intercede.
All appropriate magistrates have looked at this issue in detail and
determine the candidates are both legal. When the time comes, the
election will go forward.

Vale.


On May 23, 2009, at 11:56 AM, Roger wrote:
> So has Contio closed and the election begun? I may have missed the
> message stating that. If Contio has closed, then I will withdraw my
> request to the Praetors for the proposed lex.
>
> If it has closed, could someone please give me the message number.
> Thanks.
>
> If it has not closed, then the election has not yet started, and it
> not *yet* in the hands of the people. The whole purpose of using
> this as a proposed solution, is that is allows the whole NR
> citizenship to decide whether or not the election in valid.
>
> Lucius Quintius Constantius
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "D. Boyle" <deandreaboyle@...>
> wrote:
> >
> > Equestria Iunia Laeca L. Quintio Constantio sal.
> >
> > There is no election mess. We have two perfectly legal candidates
> for
> > Censor Suffectus. The Tribunes, Consuls, and Praetors have all
> > validated this. Now, the power has been given to the people to
> decide.
> >
> > Vale.
> >
> >
> >
> > On May 23, 2009, at 10:04 AM, Roger wrote:
> > > Considering the issues raised in the current debate on the Censor
> > > Suffectus election mess
> >
>
>
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65868 From: L Julia Aquila Date: 2009-05-23
Subject: Re: Sulla's Teaching Skills
Salve Equestria,

>That is a remarkably diverse mix of classes and quite impressive. You
>must have at least a few degrees and certificates (PhD, MBA, CPA,
>etc.) especially to be a confirmed full-time faculty in this job >market.

You forgot to mention that Sulla has another job as an accountant for a construction company. He is a jack of all trades, master of none I suppose. However does he have the time with his fingers glued to his i-phone or kb. Wonders never cease!
Now that's funnah!

Vale,
Julia
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65869 From: Roger Date: 2009-05-23
Subject: Re: Open Letter to the Praetors: Possible Solution for Election Mess
--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, David Kling <tau.athanasios@...> wrote:
>
> Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus S.P.D.
>
> From the constitution:
>
> To call the Senate, the *comitia centuriata*, and the *comitia populi
> tributa* to order when the Consuls are unavailable;
>
> --
>
> Praetores can convene the senate and comitia to order "when the Consuls are
> unavailable." They are available; therefore, the praetores cannot convene
> the Comitia Centuriate.
>
> Valete:
>
> Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus
>
>

Neither the Constitution nor the leges define "unavailable", which is obviously a much more fluid term than is "absent". I submit that conflict of interest could be a valid reason for a Consul to be considered "unavailable".

Let us assume a hypothetical situation which I hope will make my meaning clear. In this situation, two Consuls are elected who are members of Ordo Equester and business partners. They decide on forming a new joint venture, the Senate approves of, but the Senate asks for the confirmation of the Comitia Centuriata for the new business. Now presumably in such a case, the conflict of interest would seem to clearly require a presiding magistrate other than one of the Consuls. Therefore, it seems to me, that conflict of interest is a situation in which the Consuls are unavailable.

But this could also be remedied by the proposal being taken up instead by the Comitia Plebis Tributa. However, I would personally prefer that if it is taken up at all, that it be done in a Comitia in which all NR citizens are eligible to vote.

Lucius Quintius Constantius
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65870 From: David Kling Date: 2009-05-23
Subject: Re: Open Letter to the Praetors: Possible Solution for Election Mess
Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus Lucio Quintio Constantio salutem dicit

There are two precedents that already exist in Nova Roma that define "unavailable" as absent.  Both cases involve the convening of the senate.  When Cato was praetor he was asked to convene the senate by a consul; however, the senatores didn't accept his convening.  Likewise, recently Praetor Marinus tried to convene the senate at the request of the consules and several senatores protested this convening claiming the consules were present and that this convening was contrary to our law -- I think there was some threating of calling the Maine Attorney General, but that has become the typical modus operandi for several folks here.

Likewise, even with your scenario listed below the senate can ONLY advise the consules and not command them, the exception of this is an SCU which would require the consules to convene the senate and would negate the need for a comitia call.  Furthermore, even if a praetor convened the comitia a consul would still have the right of intercessio since a praetor is junior to a consul.

Vale;

Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus

On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 12:11 PM, Roger <politicog@...> wrote:


Neither the Constitution nor the leges define "unavailable", which is obviously a much more fluid term than is "absent". I submit that conflict of interest could be a valid reason for a Consul to be considered "unavailable".


Let us assume a hypothetical situation which I hope will make my meaning clear. In this situation, two Consuls are elected who are members of Ordo Equester and business partners. They decide on forming a new joint venture, the Senate approves of, but the Senate asks for the confirmation of the Comitia Centuriata for the new business. Now presumably in such a case, the conflict of interest would seem to clearly require a presiding magistrate other than one of the Consuls. Therefore, it seems to me, that conflict of interest is a situation in which the Consuls are unavailable.

But this could also be remedied by the proposal being taken up instead by the Comitia Plebis Tributa. However, I would personally prefer that if it is taken up at all, that it be done in a Comitia in which all NR citizens are eligible to vote.

Lucius Quintius Constantius 



Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65871 From: Steve Moore Date: 2009-05-23
Subject: Best Wishes to Members of the Armed Forces on the Tubilustrium

M. Valerius Potitus omnibus SPD.

 

I extend best wishes to all members of the armed forces and their on the Tubilustrium and this Memorial Day weekend. Thank you for your service in defense of your countries. We honor your service.

 

I also extend best wishes to the various re-enactment Roman legions, particularly Legio IX Hispana. You are an important part of reviving Roman life, crafts, and values.

 

Valete,

 

M. Valerius Potitus

Governor of America Austroccidentalis

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65872 From: David Kling Date: 2009-05-23
Subject: Re: Best Wishes to Members of the Armed Forces on the Tubilustrium
Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus M. Valerio Potito salutem dicit

As a former US Navy Photographers Mate (having served on the USS Dwight D. Eisenhower) during the first Gulf War I thank you for your kind words to those who serve, and have served, in the US armed forces.

Vale;

Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus

On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 12:38 PM, Steve Moore <astrobear@...> wrote:


M. Valerius Potitus omnibus SPD.

 

I extend best wishes to all members of the armed forces and their on the Tubilustrium and this Memorial Day weekend. Thank you for your service in defense of your countries. We honor your service.

 

I also extend best wishes to the various re-enactment Roman legions, particularly Legio IX Hispana. You are an important part of reviving Roman life, crafts, and values.

 

Valete,

 

M. Valerius Potitus

Governor of America Austroccidentalis


Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65873 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2009-05-23
Subject: Re: Sulla's Teaching Skills
Ave,

Thank you.

Yes, I have a Masters of education - the Emphasis was geared towards teaching High School kids (in the fields of history, social sciences, government)

My MBA has two emphasis one in Accounting and one in Entrepreneurial and Intrapreneural Management.

My Bachelors Degree was in Political Science with an emphasis on Public Administration.

The AAS Degree in paralegal studies.

The only educational goal I have yet to achieve was a JD.

Respectfully,

Sulla

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "D. Boyle" <deandreaboyle@...> wrote:
>
> Equestria Sullae sal.
>
> That is a remarkably diverse mix of classes and quite impressive. You
> must have at least a few degrees and certificates (PhD, MBA, CPA,
> etc.) especially to be a confirmed full-time faculty in this job market.
>
> Vale.
>
>
>
> On May 23, 2009, at 12:23 AM, Robert Woolwine wrote:
> > Ave,
> >
> > I have been teaching college for over 3 years - and was confirmed
> > full time faculty.
> >
> > You basically want a list of classes I teach? Sure here you go:
> >
> > Foundations of Business
> > Critical Thinking
> > Cultural Diversity
> > Skills in an Information Age
> > Introduction to World Cultures and Social Environments
> > Supervision and Leadership
> > Organizational Theory and Behavior
> > Political, Legal and Ethical Environments of Business
> > Introduction to Marketing
> > Financial Accounting 1
> >
> > This are the classes I have been approved to teach. I, on average
> > teach between 6-8 classes at a time.
> >
> > This job paid for my trip to Israel. Nice try whoever you are.
> >
> > Vale,
> >
> > Sulla
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65874 From: Timothy or Stephen Gallagher Date: 2009-05-23
Subject: The Senate Session that Cato presided over as Praetor
Salvete
 
Here is the report of the Senate Session that Cato presided over as Praetor and at my request.  My Consular colleague was AWOL and I  was in Europe for a month with intermittent internet access. 
 
 http://www.novaroma.org/nr/Session_LXXXVIII_4_September_2760
 
Valete
 
Tiberius Galerius Paulinus

To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
From: tau.athanasios@...
Date: Sat, 23 May 2009 12:34:01 -0400
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: Open Letter to the Praetors: Possible Solution for Election Mess



Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus Lucio Quintio Constantio salutem dicit

There are two precedents that already exist in Nova Roma that define "unavailable" as absent.  Both cases involve the convening of the senate.  When Cato was praetor he was asked to convene the senate by a consul; however, the senatores didn't accept his convening.  Likewise, recently Praetor Marinus tried to convene the senate at the request of the consules and several senatores protested this convening claiming the consules were present and that this convening was contrary to our law -- I think there was some threating of calling the Maine Attorney General, but that has become the typical modus operandi for several folks here.

Likewise, even with your scenario listed below the senate can ONLY advise the consules and not command them, the exception of this is an SCU which would require the consules to convene the senate and would negate the need for a comitia call.  Furthermore, even if a praetor convened the comitia a consul would still have the right of intercessio since a praetor is junior to a consul.

Vale;

Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus

On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 12:11 PM, Roger <politicog@yahoo. com> wrote:


Neither the Constitution nor the leges define "unavailable", which is obviously a much more fluid term than is "absent". I submit that conflict of interest could be a valid reason for a Consul to be considered "unavailable".


Let us assume a hypothetical situation which I hope will make my meaning clear. In this situation, two Consuls are elected who are members of Ordo Equester and business partners. They decide on forming a new joint venture, the Senate approves of, but the Senate asks for the confirmation of the Comitia Centuriata for the new business. Now presumably in such a case, the conflict of interest would seem to clearly require a presiding magistrate other than one of the Consuls. Therefore, it seems to me, that conflict of interest is a situation in which the Consuls are unavailable.

But this could also be remedied by the proposal being taken up instead by the Comitia Plebis Tributa. However, I would personally prefer that if it is taken up at all, that it be done in a Comitia in which all NR citizens are eligible to vote.

Lucius Quintius Constantius 





Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65875 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2009-05-23
Subject: Sulla's rebuttal - Re: Nova-Roma is my life (Was:The Cancer of Nova
Universities can hire individuals with Masters Degrees. And, I have two of those. Since my emphasis is in business classes my education and MBA graduate degrees both reinforce each other.

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, David Kling <tau.athanasios@...> wrote:
>
> I have a friend who teaches philosophy at a community college and adjuncts
> at another college. Between the two he teaches probably 5 courses a
> quarter; however, at the two institutions I'm most familiar with tenured
> faculty teach no more than 3 courses a quarter/semester and typically only
> teach 2 at a time. At the school I am at now it alternates one semester 2
> courses and then in the following 3. I too am baffled by the idea of
> teaching 6 to 8 courses at a time. How can a single person teach that
> much/often and still work someplace else. I suppose if some of those were
> taught on-line you could teach that many. Also, I've never considered the
> faculty at institutions I've been a student "professors" unless they were
> doctorate possessing tenured faculty; those with masters degrees teaching
> I've always considered instructors. Not that I give any more or less
> respect, it does remain an issue of academic status.
>
> Valete;
>
> Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus
>
> On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 10:53 PM, Jesse Corradino <woden66@...>wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > Six to eight college classes at a time? That's laughable... What are the
> > subjects in these "classes" pray tell? Yarn Observation? Pen Collecting?
> > I'm a doctoral student in mathematics and have attended several schools and
> > have never in my life encountered a single individual that teaches that many
> > different classes; I'm fairly sure that this is impossible unless one
> > teaches courses with the above fatuous topics.
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65876 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2009-05-23
Subject: Re: Sulla's Teaching Skills
Would you please list my title correctly. I am not JUST an accountant. I am the Comptroller of the construction company. The title on my business card says Comptroller. :)

Essentially I run the office and am empowered to sign contracts, change orders. Deal with retention related issues (construction terminology). I also deal with AR/AP, HR, Benefits analysis, filing the 940s, 941s, 1120s, making sure our annual report is filed yearly. Legal issues ranging from collections, filing and enforcing liens, going after bonds, suing contractors for non-payment. Insurance related matters (workers comp, general liability, commercial umbrella policies) as well as medical, dental and vision insurance for our employees. I also coordinate with our foremen to make sure they conduct safety meetings, prepare billings for our contractors.

Thank you for trying to diminish my duties and responsibilities. I have been at this job just over 4 years. (I was hired on my B-day May 8th). My iPhone and my previous blackberry allows me the ability to be online ANYWHERE. :) Just like when I was in Israel I was in constant contact with my jobs. And, was able to teach and grade papers while I was out of the country.

Vale,

Sulla

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "L Julia Aquila" <dis_pensible@...> wrote:
>
> Salve Equestria,
>
> >That is a remarkably diverse mix of classes and quite impressive. You
> >must have at least a few degrees and certificates (PhD, MBA, CPA,
> >etc.) especially to be a confirmed full-time faculty in this job >market.
>
> You forgot to mention that Sulla has another job as an accountant for a construction company. He is a jack of all trades, master of none I suppose. However does he have the time with his fingers glued to his i-phone or kb. Wonders never cease!
> Now that's funnah!
>
> Vale,
> Julia
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65877 From: Jennifer Harris Date: 2009-05-23
Subject: Re: Sulla's Teaching Skills
Salvete,


No offense to Sulla, but I cannot be the only person who feels these
posts are getting to personal and revealing? Why the nitpicking over
his professions? Yes it's good to know that Sulla is qualified and
capable of all these professions yet this seems to be getting to be a
forced issue...In the future if NR needs any help in the areas of
Sulla's expertise, then we know who to raise the flag to. Otherwise
getting a tad bit unneccessary folks..

Optime Valete,
Aeternia

On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 11:01 AM, Robert Woolwine
<l_cornelius_sulla@...> wrote:
>
>
> Would you please list my title correctly. I am not JUST an accountant. I am
> the Comptroller of the construction company. The title on my business card
> says Comptroller. :)
>
> Essentially I run the office and am empowered to sign contracts, change
> orders. Deal with retention related issues (construction terminology). I
> also deal with AR/AP, HR, Benefits analysis, filing the 940s, 941s, 1120s,
> making sure our annual report is filed yearly. Legal issues ranging from
> collections, filing and enforcing liens, going after bonds, suing
> contractors for non-payment. Insurance related matters (workers comp,
> general liability, commercial umbrella policies) as well as medical, dental
> and vision insurance for our employees. I also coordinate with our foremen
> to make sure they conduct safety meetings, prepare billings for our
> contractors.
>
> Thank you for trying to diminish my duties and responsibilities. I have been
> at this job just over 4 years. (I was hired on my B-day May 8th). My iPhone
> and my previous blackberry allows me the ability to be online ANYWHERE. :)
> Just like when I was in Israel I was in constant contact with my jobs. And,
> was able to teach and grade papers while I was out of the country.
>
> Vale,
>
> Sulla
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "L Julia Aquila" <dis_pensible@...> wrote:
>>
>> Salve Equestria,
>>
>> >That is a remarkably diverse mix of classes and quite impressive. You
>> >must have at least a few degrees and certificates (PhD, MBA, CPA,
>> >etc.) especially to be a confirmed full-time faculty in this job >market.
>>
>> You forgot to mention that Sulla has another job as an accountant for a
>> construction company. He is a jack of all trades, master of none I suppose.
>> However does he have the time with his fingers glued to his i-phone or kb.
>> Wonders never cease!
>> Now that's funnah!
>>
>> Vale,
>> Julia
>>
>
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65878 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2009-05-23
Subject: Tink's moderation
Is there a reason why Tink is still being moderated?

How long has her moderation been going on?

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Jennifer Harris <cyannerose@...> wrote:
>
> Salvete,
>
>
> No offense to Sulla, but I cannot be the only person who feels these
> posts are getting to personal and revealing? Why the nitpicking over
> his professions? Yes it's good to know that Sulla is qualified and
> capable of all these professions yet this seems to be getting to be a
> forced issue...In the future if NR needs any help in the areas of
> Sulla's expertise, then we know who to raise the flag to. Otherwise
> getting a tad bit unneccessary folks..
>
> Optime Valete,
> Aeternia
>
> On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 11:01 AM, Robert Woolwine
> <l_cornelius_sulla@...> wrote:
> >
> >
> > Would you please list my title correctly. I am not JUST an accountant. I am
> > the Comptroller of the construction company. The title on my business card
> > says Comptroller. :)
> >
> > Essentially I run the office and am empowered to sign contracts, change
> > orders. Deal with retention related issues (construction terminology). I
> > also deal with AR/AP, HR, Benefits analysis, filing the 940s, 941s, 1120s,
> > making sure our annual report is filed yearly. Legal issues ranging from
> > collections, filing and enforcing liens, going after bonds, suing
> > contractors for non-payment. Insurance related matters (workers comp,
> > general liability, commercial umbrella policies) as well as medical, dental
> > and vision insurance for our employees. I also coordinate with our foremen
> > to make sure they conduct safety meetings, prepare billings for our
> > contractors.
> >
> > Thank you for trying to diminish my duties and responsibilities. I have been
> > at this job just over 4 years. (I was hired on my B-day May 8th). My iPhone
> > and my previous blackberry allows me the ability to be online ANYWHERE. :)
> > Just like when I was in Israel I was in constant contact with my jobs. And,
> > was able to teach and grade papers while I was out of the country.
> >
> > Vale,
> >
> > Sulla
> >
> > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "L Julia Aquila" <dis_pensible@> wrote:
> >>
> >> Salve Equestria,
> >>
> >> >That is a remarkably diverse mix of classes and quite impressive. You
> >> >must have at least a few degrees and certificates (PhD, MBA, CPA,
> >> >etc.) especially to be a confirmed full-time faculty in this job >market.
> >>
> >> You forgot to mention that Sulla has another job as an accountant for a
> >> construction company. He is a jack of all trades, master of none I suppose.
> >> However does he have the time with his fingers glued to his i-phone or kb.
> >> Wonders never cease!
> >> Now that's funnah!
> >>
> >> Vale,
> >> Julia
> >>
> >
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65879 From: L Julia Aquila Date: 2009-05-23
Subject: Re: Classic Poetry, Prose, Proems
Salvete Omnes,

This hour's selection is an epigram ascribed to Martialis found in manuscripts and old glossaries including editions of Hadrianus Junius (Adrien de Jonghe, 1512-1575).
I.
When asked what are my employments while living in the country, I answer briefly thus: At dawn I address my prayer to the gods; I visit my slaves and my fields, and allot to my people each his due portion of work. Then I read, and invoke Phoebus, and solicit the Muses. Next I anoint myself with olive oil, and take gentle exercise in the palaestra; at peace in mind, and free from interest-bearing debts. Then I dine, drink, sing, play, bathe, sup, and go to bed; while my little lamp consumes its modicum of oil, and furnishes these trifles elaborated by the aid of the muses at night.

Valete,
Julia
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65880 From: David Kling Date: 2009-05-23
Subject: Re: Tink's moderation
Why don't you contact the Maine Attorney General?  Or talk with your lawyer?  Or file a suit against the praetores or their scribae?  Or perhaps you could stop looking for conspiracies at every opportunity!

Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus

On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 1:57 PM, Robert Woolwine <l_cornelius_sulla@...> wrote:


Is there a reason why Tink is still being moderated?

How long has her moderation been going on?

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Jennifer Harris <cyannerose@...> wrote:
>
> Salvete,
>
>
> No offense to Sulla, but I cannot be the only person who feels these
> posts are getting to personal and revealing? Why the nitpicking over
> his professions? Yes it's good to know that Sulla is qualified and
> capable of all these professions yet this seems to be getting to be a
> forced issue...In the future if NR needs any help in the areas of
> Sulla's expertise, then we know who to raise the flag to. Otherwise
> getting a tad bit unneccessary folks..
>
> Optime Valete,
> Aeternia




Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65881 From: L Julia Aquila Date: 2009-05-23
Subject: Re: Tink's moderation
Salve Sulla,

Who is Tink?

Vale optime,
Julia
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65882 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2009-05-23
Subject: Re: Tink's moderation
Salvete,


No offense to Sulla, but I cannot be the only person who feels these
posts are getting to personal and revealing? Why the nitpicking over
his professions? Yes it's good to know that Sulla is qualified and
capable of all these professions yet this seems to be getting to be a
forced issue...In the future if NR needs any help in the areas of
Sulla's expertise, then we know who to raise the flag to. Otherwise
getting a tad bit unneccessary folks..

Optime Valete,
Aeternia

Aeternia Cornelia - her nickname is Tink. :)

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "L Julia Aquila" <dis_pensible@...> wrote:
>
> Salve Sulla,
>
> Who is Tink?
>
> Vale optime,
> Julia
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65883 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2009-05-23
Subject: Re: Tink's moderation
She has been a citizen in good standing in Nova Roma since 2000. Should a citizen in good standing for almost 9 years be moderated on the ML? It sure seems that is acceptable to you.

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, David Kling <tau.athanasios@...> wrote:
>
> Why don't you contact the Maine Attorney General? Or talk with your
> lawyer? Or file a suit against the praetores or their scribae? Or perhaps
> you could stop looking for conspiracies at every opportunity!
>
> Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus
>
> On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 1:57 PM, Robert Woolwine <
> l_cornelius_sulla@...> wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > Is there a reason why Tink is still being moderated?
> >
> > How long has her moderation been going on?
> >
> > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com <Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com>, Jennifer
> > Harris <cyannerose@> wrote:
> > >
> > > Salvete,
> > >
> > >
> > > No offense to Sulla, but I cannot be the only person who feels these
> > > posts are getting to personal and revealing? Why the nitpicking over
> > > his professions? Yes it's good to know that Sulla is qualified and
> > > capable of all these professions yet this seems to be getting to be a
> > > forced issue...In the future if NR needs any help in the areas of
> > > Sulla's expertise, then we know who to raise the flag to. Otherwise
> > > getting a tad bit unneccessary folks..
> > >
> > > Optime Valete,
> > > Aeternia
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65884 From: Jennifer Harris Date: 2009-05-23
Subject: Re: Tink's moderation
Salve Modianus,


Those words were completely unneccesary as well, Syulla was wondering
why I am being moderated considering I have been a member of this
organization since '00..... Is it due to the fact that I usually keep
a low profile perhaps? It was for clarification purposes only and I
again request that this moderation be lifted rectified whatever have
you..


Gents... Take some midol please :-)

Vale,
R. Cornelia Aeternia (That "Tink" person)

On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 12:06 PM, David Kling <tau.athanasios@...> wrote:
>
>
> Why don't you contact the Maine Attorney General?  Or talk with your
> lawyer?  Or file a suit against the praetores or their scribae?  Or perhaps
> you could stop looking for conspiracies at every opportunity!
>
> Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus
>
> On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 1:57 PM, Robert Woolwine
> <l_cornelius_sulla@...> wrote:
>>
>>
>> Is there a reason why Tink is still being moderated?
>>
>> How long has her moderation been going on?
>>
>> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Jennifer Harris <cyannerose@...> wrote:
>> >
>> > Salvete,
>> >
>> >
>> > No offense to Sulla, but I cannot be the only person who feels these
>> > posts are getting to personal and revealing? Why the nitpicking over
>> > his professions? Yes it's good to know that Sulla is qualified and
>> > capable of all these professions yet this seems to be getting to be a
>> > forced issue...In the future if NR needs any help in the areas of
>> > Sulla's expertise, then we know who to raise the flag to. Otherwise
>> > getting a tad bit unneccessary folks..
>> >
>> > Optime Valete,
>> > Aeternia
>>
>
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65885 From: Matt Hucke Date: 2009-05-23
Subject: Re: Open Letter to the Praetors: Possible Solution for Election Mess
> I ask one of the Praetors to call the Comitia Centuriata to consider
> the proposed lex below. This proposed lex would do the following: revoke the
> edict calling for candidates for Censor Suffectus and all proceedings held
> under its authority, i.e. both candidacies are void.

Do the Praetores have a time machine? The election for Censor is already set up;
thus any special election would have to be called for after, and attempting to undo
the results of an election - after it's been decided - would result in a battle of
words even uglier than the one that's happening now.

O.
(oddly amvsed)

--
Matt Hucke (hucke@...), programmer.
author, Graveyards of Illinois - http://graveyards.com/
CYNICO.NET - hosting from $8.33/month; domains $13 - http://cynico.net/
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65886 From: C. Maria Caeca Date: 2009-05-23
Subject: our untapped resource
Salvete Omnes,

It strikes me that we are like a small town, but, geographically scattered
over several continents. I dearly love out International character, but it
is extremely difficult to foster a sense of cohesive community when the
likelihood is that most of us will never meet one another, personally. True,
local organizations and events are the best option for doing this, with
certain limitations, but even that is not always possible. Some Provinces
are just too large, and some citizens, even in relatively small provinces
cannot travel far, for a number of valid reasons. My point is, though, that
human, informal contact is as important to the growth of this community as
are more formal initiatives. It's so very much harder to attack or dismiss
(though some do manage), someone with you have developed a sense of
personality. They become multi-dimensional to you. You know a bit about
their lives, their problems, their sense of humor, and if you don't
understand something they are saying, or why they are saying it, you can
resolve that immediately, and, hopefully, in a friendly way. It is possible
to develop personal correspondences here, as many of us have done, and they
are extremely satisfying. Not as satisfying as sitting around a table, or
doing something together, but if the optimum choices are unavailable, then
the positive steps are to take advantage of those which do exist.

In addition, because of our International nature, we have many citizens who
are using their 2nd or 3rd (or whatever number applies), to communicate,
which creates issues on both sides. Things get a bit tangled in
translation, at times, and takes a deal of patience for someone for whom
English is a learned language to plow through long posts and translate them,
let alone find the nuances of personality which peep through.

I am saying all this because we have an untapped, virtually unused, resource
available to us, 7 days week, 24 hours a day. We have a chat room. The
software to use it is free (I think, though I had to buy mine, because I
have to use special tools with it), it is easy to access, and free to use.
Because it is a private room, we don't have to put up with some of the
negative side effects of chat rooms, and it is a good place to have fun,
brainstorm ideas, get to know one another better, and get a sense of the
personalities behind the names in an informal, person to person manner. Not
the ideal, and yes, I *do* realize that we are still seeing only what wishes
to be seen on both sides, but with a bit of effort, time, and a modicum of
trust, it can work for us. We had a market day chat recently, to which no
one came. I find that a bit sad, but I'm stubborn, if nothing else, so here
is what I'm going to do.

When I am at home, and on the computer, I will be in the chat room. You can
do anything while waiting for folks to drop in, so I won't be sitting idle,
and I invite those of you who have never come in to do so, because I would
very much like to get to know you, as I have a few of our citizens who
already use this resource.

If I mistake the information below, someone *please* correct me!

You can find and download the IRC software which is called Mirc by simply
doing a Google search on the term Mirc. Once you have done so and installed
it, simply go to IRC.freenode.net and then type /join #NovaRoma. That's it.
Believe me, if *I* could do it, anyone on this list (or a 4 year old who has
never touched a computer before, can).

Valete Bene,
C. Maria Caeca
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65887 From: L Julia Aquila Date: 2009-05-23
Subject: Re: R. Cornelia Aeternia aka Tink's moderation
L. Iulia Aquila R. Corneliae Aeterniae S.P.D.

I have notified the Praetores on your behalf. This may take a little while as one of the Praetores is on personal leave.
I thank you for your patience in this matter.

Optime vale,
L. Iulia Aquila
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65888 From: Matt Hucke Date: 2009-05-23
Subject: Re: Sulla's Teaching Skills
> Would you please list my title correctly. I am not JUST an accountant.
> I am the Comptroller of the construction company. The title on my business
> card says Comptroller. :)

Impressive... but *I* am a *Wizard*.

In dimly lit rooms, I craft incantations in mysterious and unspeakable
languages, filled with arcane symbols that make mere mortals tremble.
awk! sed! perl! php!

I bind daemons and issue orders to them, so that they do my bidding, even
as I sleep. These daemons, though physically confined to small metal boxes,
make their influence felt worldwide. When a daemon misbehaves, I slay it
without pity, and summon another servitor that will better implement my
Will.

For mine is the power of the Source.

O.

--
Matt Hucke (hucke@...), programmer.
author, Graveyards of Illinois - http://graveyards.com/
CYNICO.NET - hosting from $8.33/month; domains $13 - http://cynico.net/
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65889 From: L Julia Aquila Date: 2009-05-23
Subject: Re: our untapped resource
Salve Mariae,

Thank you for this information.

Vale optime,
Julia
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65890 From: L Julia Aquila Date: 2009-05-23
Subject: Re: Classic Poetry, Prose, Proems
Salvete Omnes,

Time for a taste of beautiful imagery:
Martialis
III.65
The scent of an apple as a tender girl bites it; the smell which comes from a Corycian saffron; a silvery vineyard blooming with its first clusters; the odour of grasses which a sheep has just grazed; the perfume of myrtle; of an Arabian harvester; of rubbed amber; of a fire pale with Eastern incense; of turf when it has been lightly sprinkled with summer rain; of a garland which has been laid on hair moist with nard - this, cruel boy Diadumenus, is the fragrance of your kisses. What if you were to give them in full, ungrudgingly?

III.65
quod spirat tenera malum mordente puella,
quod de Corycio quae uenit aura croco;
uinea quod primis cum floret cana racemis,
gramina quod redolent, quae modo carpsit ouis;
quod myrtus, quod messor Arabs, quod sucina trita,
pallidus Eoo ture quod ignis olet;
gleba quod aestiuo leuiter cum spargitur imbre,
quod madidas nardo passa corona comas:
hoc tua, saeue puer Diadumene, basia fragrant.
quid si tota dares illa sine inuidia?


Valete,
Julia
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65891 From: lathyrus77 Date: 2009-05-23
Subject: Re: our untapped resource
--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "C. Maria Caeca" <shoshanahathaway@...> wrote:
>

> You can find and download the IRC software which is called Mirc by simply
> doing a Google search on the term Mirc. Once you have done so and installed
> it, simply go to IRC.freenode.net and then type /join #NovaRoma. That's it.
> Believe me, if *I* could do it, anyone on this list (or a 4 year old who has
> never touched a computer before, can).
>
> Valete Bene,
> C. Maria Caeca
>


Except it's run by the BA rats, so unless you're on good terms with those trolls, they'll stop you from participating.

I was muted within 3 minutes.

-Anna
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65892 From: L Julia Aquila Date: 2009-05-23
Subject: Re: Sulla's Teaching Skills
Salve "O" Arcanus!

> Impressive... but *I* am a *Wizard*.
>
> In dimly lit rooms, I craft incantations in mysterious and unspeakable
> languages, filled with arcane symbols that make mere mortals tremble.
> awk! sed! perl! php!
>
> I bind daemons and issue orders to them, so that they do my bidding, even
> as I sleep. These daemons, though physically confined to small metal boxes,
> make their influence felt worldwide. When a daemon misbehaves, I slay it
> without pity, and summon another servitor that will better implement my
> Will.
>
> For mine is the power of the Source.

Bbbbuttt....you stole my lines!!! Damned peeping daemons will suffer my wrath!
Kind of reminds me of that David Bromberg song "Demon in Disguise";)

Vale,
Julia
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65893 From: L Julia Aquila Date: 2009-05-23
Subject: Re: our untapped resource
Salve Anna,

Thank you as well. I don't participate in chat rooms because I do not have the time however maybe someone could create one for the official Nova Roma mailing list.
I am not sure how that would work but it might be something worth looking into if enough people are interested.

Vale,
Julia
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65894 From: David Kling Date: 2009-05-23
Subject: Re: Tink's moderation
Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus R. Corneliae Aeterniae salutem dicit

There is your answer.  The praetores have not known who you are, and Sulla knows this.  He was simply trying to cause trouble in his efforts to discredit the praetores.

Vale;

Modianus

On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 2:12 PM, Jennifer Harris <cyannerose@...> wrote:


Salve Modianus,

Those words were completely unneccesary as well, Syulla was wondering
why I am being moderated considering I have been a member of this
organization since '00..... Is it due to the fact that I usually keep
a low profile perhaps? It was for clarification purposes only and I
again request that this moderation be lifted rectified whatever have
you..

Gents... Take some midol please :-)

Vale,
R. Cornelia Aeternia (That "Tink" person)




Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65895 From: C. Maria Caeca Date: 2009-05-23
Subject: Re: our untapped resource
Salve, Julia Aquila et salvete omnes,

The chat room we do have is run by the Curule Aedils office, so it an
official NR resource.

C. Maria Caeca
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65896 From: David Kling Date: 2009-05-23
Subject: Re: Sulla's Teaching Skills
Have you seen this:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7Mp7Ikko8SI

Hilarious!

Vale:

Modianus

On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 2:37 PM, Matt Hucke <hucke@...> wrote:



> Would you please list my title correctly. I am not JUST an accountant.
> I am the Comptroller of the construction company. The title on my business
> card says Comptroller. :)

Impressive... but *I* am a *Wizard*.

In dimly lit rooms, I craft incantations in mysterious and unspeakable
languages, filled with arcane symbols that make mere mortals tremble.
awk! sed! perl! php!

I bind daemons and issue orders to them, so that they do my bidding, even
as I sleep. These daemons, though physically confined to small metal boxes,
make their influence felt worldwide. When a daemon misbehaves, I slay it
without pity, and summon another servitor that will better implement my
Will.

For mine is the power of the Source.

O.

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65897 From: L Julia Aquila Date: 2009-05-23
Subject: Re: our untapped resource
Salve Mariae,

Thank you once again;)

Vale,
Julia
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65898 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2009-05-23
Subject: Re: Open Letter to the Praetors: NO Election Mess
Cato Quinto Constantio sal.

Salve!

The election process is legal and valid; that has never been in question. There is some question about the validity of one of the candidates' being able to stand for the office.

Vale!

Cato


--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Roger" <politicog@...> wrote:
>
>
> So has Contio closed and the election begun? I may have missed the message stating that. If Contio has closed, then I will withdraw my request to the Praetors for the proposed lex.
>
> If it has closed, could someone please give me the message number. Thanks.
>
> If it has not closed, then the election has not yet started, and it not *yet* in the hands of the people. The whole purpose of using this as a proposed solution, is that is allows the whole NR citizenship to decide whether or not the election in valid.
>
>
> Lucius Quintius Constantius
>
>
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "D. Boyle" <deandreaboyle@> wrote:
> >
> > Equestria Iunia Laeca L. Quintio Constantio sal.
> >
> > There is no election mess. We have two perfectly legal candidates for
> > Censor Suffectus. The Tribunes, Consuls, and Praetors have all
> > validated this. Now, the power has been given to the people to decide.
> >
> > Vale.
> >
> >
> >
> > On May 23, 2009, at 10:04 AM, Roger wrote:
> > > Considering the issues raised in the current debate on the Censor
> > > Suffectus election mess
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65899 From: Maior Date: 2009-05-23
Subject: Re: Open Letter to the Praetors: NO Election Mess
M. Hortensia G. Equitio sal;
actually there is no question about this whatsoever,the consuls, praetors and tribunes have all certified both candidates.

I suggest you post positive things about yourself Cato to get people to vote for you, than try to create a faux legal fuss.

Now back to my Latin exam!
optime vale
M. Hortensia Maior

>
> Cato Quinto Constantio sal.
>
> Salve!
>
> The election process is legal and valid; that has never been in question. There is some question about the validity of one of the candidates' being able to stand for the office.
>
> Vale!
>
> Cato
>
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Roger" <politicog@> wrote:
> >
> >
> > So has Contio closed and the election begun? I may have missed the message stating that. If Contio has closed, then I will withdraw my request to the Praetors for the proposed lex.
> >
> > If it has closed, could someone please give me the message number. Thanks.
> >
> > If it has not closed, then the election has not yet started, and it not *yet* in the hands of the people. The whole purpose of using this as a proposed solution, is that is allows the whole NR citizenship to decide whether or not the election in valid.
> >
> >
> > Lucius Quintius Constantius
> >
> >
> >
> > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "D. Boyle" <deandreaboyle@> wrote:
> > >
> > > Equestria Iunia Laeca L. Quintio Constantio sal.
> > >
> > > There is no election mess. We have two perfectly legal candidates for
> > > Censor Suffectus. The Tribunes, Consuls, and Praetors have all
> > > validated this. Now, the power has been given to the people to decide.
> > >
> > > Vale.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On May 23, 2009, at 10:04 AM, Roger wrote:
> > > > Considering the issues raised in the current debate on the Censor
> > > > Suffectus election mess
> > >
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65900 From: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com Date: 2009-05-23
Subject: Comitia Centuriata Election, 5/23/2009, 11:00 pm
Reminder from:   Nova-Roma Yahoo! Group
 
Title:   Comitia Centuriata Election
 
Date:   Saturday May 23, 2009
Time:   11:00 pm - 12:00 am
Repeats:   This event repeats every day until Monday May 25, 2009.
Next reminder:   The next reminder for this event will be sent in 14 minutes.
Notes:   The Comitia Centuriata election will follow this schedule:

* 07:00 hrs CET 25 May: Voting by the Centuria Praerogativa alone begins.
* 07:00 hrs CET 27 May: Diribitores capture tally of Centuria Praerogativa.
* 07:00 hrs CET 27 May: Voting by all First Class centuries now permitted.
* 07:00 hrs CET 30 May: Diribitores capture tally of all First Class centuries.
* 07:00 hrs CET 30 May: Voting by all centuries now permitted.
* 17:00 hrs CET 3 June: All voting ends.
 
Copyright © 2009  Yahoo! Inc. All Rights Reserved | Terms of Service | Privacy Policy
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65901 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2009-05-23
Subject: Re: Open Letter to the Praetors: NO Election Mess
Cato Maiori sal.

Salve!

If the President of the United States breaks the law, the law is still broken.

There most certainly *is* a question. Just because you don't like the question doesn't mean it doesn't exist.

Vale,

Cato



--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Maior" <rory12001@...> wrote:
>
> M. Hortensia G. Equitio sal;
> actually there is no question about this whatsoever,the consuls, praetors and tribunes have all certified both candidates.
>
> I suggest you post positive things about yourself Cato to get people to vote for you, than try to create a faux legal fuss.
>
> Now back to my Latin exam!
> optime vale
> M. Hortensia Maior
>
> >
> > Cato Quinto Constantio sal.
> >
> > Salve!
> >
> > The election process is legal and valid; that has never been in question. There is some question about the validity of one of the candidates' being able to stand for the office.
> >
> > Vale!
> >
> > Cato
> >
> >
> > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Roger" <politicog@> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > So has Contio closed and the election begun? I may have missed the message stating that. If Contio has closed, then I will withdraw my request to the Praetors for the proposed lex.
> > >
> > > If it has closed, could someone please give me the message number. Thanks.
> > >
> > > If it has not closed, then the election has not yet started, and it not *yet* in the hands of the people. The whole purpose of using this as a proposed solution, is that is allows the whole NR citizenship to decide whether or not the election in valid.
> > >
> > >
> > > Lucius Quintius Constantius
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "D. Boyle" <deandreaboyle@> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Equestria Iunia Laeca L. Quintio Constantio sal.
> > > >
> > > > There is no election mess. We have two perfectly legal candidates for
> > > > Censor Suffectus. The Tribunes, Consuls, and Praetors have all
> > > > validated this. Now, the power has been given to the people to decide.
> > > >
> > > > Vale.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On May 23, 2009, at 10:04 AM, Roger wrote:
> > > > > Considering the issues raised in the current debate on the Censor
> > > > > Suffectus election mess
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65902 From: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com Date: 2009-05-23
Subject: Comitia Centuriata Election, 5/23/2009, 11:00 pm
Reminder from:   Nova-Roma Yahoo! Group
 
Title:   Comitia Centuriata Election
 
Date:   Saturday May 23, 2009
Time:   11:00 pm - 12:00 am
Repeats:   This event repeats every day until Monday May 25, 2009.
Notes:   The Comitia Centuriata election will follow this schedule:

* 07:00 hrs CET 25 May: Voting by the Centuria Praerogativa alone begins.
* 07:00 hrs CET 27 May: Diribitores capture tally of Centuria Praerogativa.
* 07:00 hrs CET 27 May: Voting by all First Class centuries now permitted.
* 07:00 hrs CET 30 May: Diribitores capture tally of all First Class centuries.
* 07:00 hrs CET 30 May: Voting by all centuries now permitted.
* 17:00 hrs CET 3 June: All voting ends.
 
Copyright © 2009  Yahoo! Inc. All Rights Reserved | Terms of Service | Privacy Policy
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65903 From: Roger Date: 2009-05-23
Subject: Re: Open Letter to the Praetors: NO Election Mess
I see that Contio on this matter is ending, and the vote beginning. Therefore, my request to the Praetors in the Open Letter is hereby withdrawn.

Lucius Quintius Constantius



- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Gaius Equitius Cato" <mlcinnyc@...> wrote:
>
> Cato Quinto Constantio sal.
>
> Salve!
>
> The election process is legal and valid; that has never been in question. There is some question about the validity of one of the candidates' being able to stand for the office.
>
> Vale!
>
> Cato
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65904 From: Publius Memmius Albucius Date: 2009-05-23
Subject: Re: Open Letter to the Praetors: Possible Solution for Election Mess
Lucio Quintio Constantio s.d.

We praetors acknowledge good receipt of your open letter.

Unhappily, without we need to examine the matter of your request, how interesting or grounded it might be, I must inform you that the praetors are authorized, by our constitution, to convene the comitia centuriata in the sole case of the unavaibility of both consuls.
As currently, neither Consul Curiatius nor Consul Iulius are unavailable, the praetors cannot give a positive answer to your request.

Vale Constanti,


P. Memmius Albucius
praetor



--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Roger" <politicog@...> wrote:
>
> Considering the issues raised in the current debate on the Censor Suffectus election mess, I propose a possible solution to the issue.
>
> I ask one of the Praetors to call the Comitia Centuriata to consider the proposed lex below. This proposed lex would do the following: revoke the edict calling for candidates for Censor Suffectus and all proceedings held under its authority, i.e. both candidacies are void. It then instructs the Consuls to issue a new edict for the Censor Suffectus election, and requires such an edict to be issued within 72 hours of the approval of the proposed lex. Should the Consuls fail or refuse to do so within the required period, then the Consuls are considered to fall within the meaning of "derelict in his duties" in the NR Constitution, and the office of both Consuls declared vacant. Finally, only in the event of the consulship being declared vacant, the Senate is then instructed to immediately appoint an interrex in the terms of the Constitution, who has the authority to call new elections for the Consulship.
>
> I have no axe to grind against the current Consuls. However, a lex that only proposes something but does not provide penalties, is ineffective. I presume that in the event of this lex being proposed and passed, the Consuls will undoubtedly do their duties and issue the new edictum. However, in case, for whatever reason, that doesn't happen, this lex would then provide the remedy, by declaring the consulship vacant on its own terms, without the necessity of calling the Comitia again.
>
> The reason that I am asking the Praetors to convene the Comiata Centuriata is because this lex expressly deals with the duties of the Consuls and issues instructions to them. Since this could be considered conflict of interest, in the interest of the impartiality of proceedings, then the Praetors should preside over the Comitia during the discussion and vote on this item.
>
> This lex does not directly address the issue of the legality of the candidacies. That is also an issue that needs to be made clear in the law. However, this lex would let us start the process all over again. While we are doing so, I would advise convening magistrates that they should consider proposals to clarify the meaning of "consecutive" in operative legislation.
>
> I think in the current climate, the election of either current candidate is likely to lead to disaster. If we follow this method that I propose, the People will decide the issue before proceeding to the election. If they think it is o.k. to proceed as is, vote against this proposed lex, if they think we need a do-over, vote for it.
>
> My understanding of the naming conventions of the leges in Nova Roma is admittedly deficient. Therefore, I have not given a name to this lex, but appreciate anyone that can give it an appropriate name.
>
>
> Lucius Quintius Constantius
>
>
> Proposed new lex:
>
> [Insert name of lex]
>
> 1. The Consular Call for candidates for the office of Censor Suffectus, to supply the vacancy caused by the resignation of former Censor Gaius Popillius Laenas, issued by Consul Marcus Curiatius Complutensis, on ante diem X Kal. Mai, A.U.C. MMDCCLXII, in the consulship of Marcus Curiatus Complutensis and Marcus Iulius Severus, is hereby revoked and all proceedings held thereunder are hereby declared null and void.
>
> 2. The Consuls are hereby instructed to issue a new edictum calling for qualified candidates for the office of Censor Suffectus for the term ending December 31, MMDCCLXIII, to fill the vacancy caused by the reignation of former Censor Gaius Popillius Laenas.
>
> 3. The edictum referred to in paragraph 2 shall be issued within 72 hours of the approval of this lex.
>
> 4. If the edictum referred to in paragraph 3 is not issued within the time specified, the consuls are considered to have met the standard of "derelict in his duties" in IV.A. of the Constitution of Nova Roma, and the office of both Consuls is declared vacant.
>
> 5. Only if the terms in paragraph 4 are operative, the Senate is instructed to immediately select an interrex in the terms of the provisions of IV.B.2. of the Constitution of Nova Roma.
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65905 From: politicog Date: 2009-05-23
Subject: Re: Open Letter to the Praetors: Possible Solution for Election Mess
Praetor,

Thanks for the reply. But as I previously stated, since Contio is now over, and the vote has begun, the request was withdrawn.

Lucius Quintius Constantius




--- On Sat, 5/23/09, Publius Memmius Albucius <albucius_aoe@...> wrote:

> From: Publius Memmius Albucius <albucius_aoe@...>
> Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Open Letter to the Praetors: Possible Solution for Election Mess
> To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> Date: Saturday, May 23, 2009, 7:31 PM
> Lucio Quintio Constantio s.d.
>
> We praetors acknowledge good receipt of your open letter.
>
> Unhappily, without we need to examine the matter of your
> request, how interesting or grounded it might be, I must
> inform you that the praetors are authorized, by our
> constitution, to convene the comitia centuriata in the sole
> case of the unavaibility of both consuls.
> As currently, neither Consul Curiatius nor Consul Iulius
> are unavailable, the praetors cannot give a positive answer
> to your request.
>
> Vale Constanti,
>
>
> P. Memmius Albucius
> praetor
>
>
>
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65906 From: A. Sempronius Regulus Date: 2009-05-23
Subject: May and Mothers
Salvete omnes,
 
May must be an extremely difficult mounth for mothers. There is the stress of a possible June wedding or helping a friend through it. It is also the month where Greek, Turkish, Italian, and German mothers mourn the loss of life at the fall of Constantinople (the eastern Roman Empire) in 1453 that is still celebrated in parts of those countries with deeper roots than the US or EU. It is the month of Mother's Day (always a hazardous path between neglect or lets give mom too much attention of the wrong kind vs. will they give me what I need in the right amounts). Mother's Day is the same weekend as WW2 VE Day in Europe. Surely, for at least a couple of generations, that is also a tough day for mothers. My grandmother had six sons. The three oldest were Wehrmacht, the next 2 youngest served US Armed Forces WW2, and the very youngest in Korea: four survived of those in WW2. May, Memorial Day, as far as it connects to my family, honors WW1 veterans (mine were 1 greatuncle US, greatuncles and grandfathers, Imperial and Bavarian German forces) that is also a heavy toll on the mother's and grandmother' s on this day. Separate from my family-traditions, Memorial Day also dates back to American Civil War and is close to the somewhat forgotten holiday of American Civil War Re-unification Day. Still, this must mean May is a bad series of celebrations for mothers. I was recently reminded of this because my mother (dying - Senator Marcus Audens, who I also recommend for Censor, and I shared a bit on this part of life) wanted on her Mother's Day to go to a VE day re-union of WW2 elderly survivors and to visit the US graves of her military dead (she can't travel overseas so it was dead buried in the US). She remembered some 1940s June brides that mothers stressed over getting the wedding right -- that did not happen. So, closure, referring to June at the beginning and closing with June at the end, I repeat, the month of May has to be a very tough month for mothers. May should be the month of mothers and veterans -- sufferers of the delicate mortality of life.
 
Valete omnes,
A. Sempronius Regulus
 
 

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65907 From: Maior Date: 2009-05-23
Subject: Re: Open Letter to the Praetors: NO Election Mess
Maior Catoni sal;
what on earth are you talking about? There is no issue, except what you are trying to make up.As the consuls, praetors and tribunes are just fine with the situation. The entire ML seems to understand the meaning of 'consecutive'. We even had Agricola who is a professor of English with an MA in applied Linguistics post what the Oxford English dictionary says.

This is just another tiresome endless game as you so elegantly put it 'for shits and giggles'. And I, for one, am not playing.

back to my Latin exam.
bene valet in pacem deorum
M. Hortensia Maior
>
> Cato Maiori sal.
>
> Salve!
>
> If the President of the United States breaks the law, the law is still broken.
>
> There most certainly *is* a question. Just because you don't like the question doesn't mean it doesn't exist.
>
> Vale,
>
> Cato
>
>
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Maior" <rory12001@> wrote:
> >
> > M. Hortensia G. Equitio sal;
> > actually there is no question about this whatsoever,the consuls, praetors and tribunes have all certified both candidates.
> >
> > I suggest you post positive things about yourself Cato to get people to vote for you, than try to create a faux legal fuss.
> >
> > Now back to my Latin exam!
> > optime vale
> > M. Hortensia Maior
> >
> > >
> > > Cato Quinto Constantio sal.
> > >
> > > Salve!
> > >
> > > The election process is legal and valid; that has never been in question. There is some question about the validity of one of the candidates' being able to stand for the office.
> > >
> > > Vale!
> > >
> > > Cato
> > >
> > >
> > > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Roger" <politicog@> wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > So has Contio closed and the election begun? I may have missed the message stating that. If Contio has closed, then I will withdraw my request to the Praetors for the proposed lex.
> > > >
> > > > If it has closed, could someone please give me the message number. Thanks.
> > > >
> > > > If it has not closed, then the election has not yet started, and it not *yet* in the hands of the people. The whole purpose of using this as a proposed solution, is that is allows the whole NR citizenship to decide whether or not the election in valid.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Lucius Quintius Constantius
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "D. Boyle" <deandreaboyle@> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Equestria Iunia Laeca L. Quintio Constantio sal.
> > > > >
> > > > > There is no election mess. We have two perfectly legal candidates for
> > > > > Censor Suffectus. The Tribunes, Consuls, and Praetors have all
> > > > > validated this. Now, the power has been given to the people to decide.
> > > > >
> > > > > Vale.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On May 23, 2009, at 10:04 AM, Roger wrote:
> > > > > > Considering the issues raised in the current debate on the Censor
> > > > > > Suffectus election mess
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65908 From: Terry Boyle Date: 2009-05-23
Subject: Re: Open Letter to the Praetors: NO Election Mess
   Salve Maior,
 
If the President of the U.S. dies ie JFK and the VP finnishes his term dose that mean the VP can only run for one more term? I think not.
 
   Vale,
 
    CFOs Hubbie
 
ahh I can't remember my NR name  sorrrry!!
 
 
 
 
----- Original Message -----
From: Maior
Sent: Saturday, May 23, 2009 8:18 PM
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Open Letter to the Praetors: NO Election Mess

Maior Catoni sal;
what on earth are you talking about? There is no issue, except what you are trying to make up.As the consuls, praetors and tribunes are just fine with the situation. The entire ML seems to understand the meaning of 'consecutive' . We even had Agricola who is a professor of English with an MA in applied Linguistics post what the Oxford English dictionary says.

This is just another tiresome endless game as you so elegantly put it 'for shits and giggles'. And I, for one, am not playing.

back to my Latin exam.
bene valet in pacem deorum
M. Hortensia Maior
>
> Cato Maiori sal.
>
> Salve!
>
> If the President of the United States breaks the law, the law is still broken.
>
> There most certainly *is* a question. Just because you don't like the question doesn't mean it doesn't exist.
>
> Vale,
>
> Cato
>
>
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com, "Maior" <rory12001@> wrote:
> >
> > M. Hortensia G. Equitio sal;
> > actually there is no question about this whatsoever,the consuls, praetors and tribunes have all certified both candidates.
> >
> > I suggest you post positive things about yourself Cato to get people to vote for you, than try to create a faux legal fuss.
> >
> > Now back to my Latin exam!
> > optime vale
> > M. Hortensia Maior
> >
> > >
> > > Cato Quinto Constantio sal.
> > >
> > > Salve!
> > >
> > > The election process is legal and valid; that has never been in question. There is some question about the validity of one of the candidates' being able to stand for the office.
> > >
> > > Vale!
> > >
> > > Cato
> > >
> > >
> > > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com, "Roger" <politicog@> wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > So has Contio closed and the election begun? I may have missed the message stating that. If Contio has closed, then I will withdraw my request to the Praetors for the proposed lex.
> > > >
> > > > If it has closed, could someone please give me the message number. Thanks.
> > > >
> > > > If it has not closed, then the election has not yet started, and it not *yet* in the hands of the people. The whole purpose of using this as a proposed solution, is that is allows the whole NR citizenship to decide whether or not the election in valid.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Lucius Quintius Constantius
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com, "D. Boyle" <deandreaboyle@ > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Equestria Iunia Laeca L. Quintio Constantio sal.
> > > > >
> > > > > There is no election mess. We have two perfectly legal candidates for
> > > > > Censor Suffectus. The Tribunes, Consuls, and Praetors have all
> > > > > validated this. Now, the power has been given to the people to decide.
> > > > >
> > > > > Vale.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On May 23, 2009, at 10:04 AM, Roger wrote:
> > > > > > Considering the issues raised in the current debate on the Censor
> > > > > > Suffectus election mess
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65909 From: Q. Valerius Poplicola Date: 2009-05-23
Subject: Re: Open Letter to the Praetors: Possible Solution for Election Mess
So, so sad this didn't get off the ground. Stick around, Constantius, you're a breath of fresh air needed around here.

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Roger" <politicog@...> wrote:
>
> Considering the issues raised in the current debate on the Censor Suffectus election mess, I propose a possible solution to the issue.
>
> I ask one of the Praetors to call the Comitia Centuriata to consider the proposed lex below. This proposed lex would do the following: revoke the edict calling for candidates for Censor Suffectus and all proceedings held under its authority, i.e. both candidacies are void. It then instructs the Consuls to issue a new edict for the Censor Suffectus election, and requires such an edict to be issued within 72 hours of the approval of the proposed lex. Should the Consuls fail or refuse to do so within the required period, then the Consuls are considered to fall within the meaning of "derelict in his duties" in the NR Constitution, and the office of both Consuls declared vacant. Finally, only in the event of the consulship being declared vacant, the Senate is then instructed to immediately appoint an interrex in the terms of the Constitution, who has the authority to call new elections for the Consulship.
>
> I have no axe to grind against the current Consuls. However, a lex that only proposes something but does not provide penalties, is ineffective. I presume that in the event of this lex being proposed and passed, the Consuls will undoubtedly do their duties and issue the new edictum. However, in case, for whatever reason, that doesn't happen, this lex would then provide the remedy, by declaring the consulship vacant on its own terms, without the necessity of calling the Comitia again.
>
> The reason that I am asking the Praetors to convene the Comiata Centuriata is because this lex expressly deals with the duties of the Consuls and issues instructions to them. Since this could be considered conflict of interest, in the interest of the impartiality of proceedings, then the Praetors should preside over the Comitia during the discussion and vote on this item.
>
> This lex does not directly address the issue of the legality of the candidacies. That is also an issue that needs to be made clear in the law. However, this lex would let us start the process all over again. While we are doing so, I would advise convening magistrates that they should consider proposals to clarify the meaning of "consecutive" in operative legislation.
>
> I think in the current climate, the election of either current candidate is likely to lead to disaster. If we follow this method that I propose, the People will decide the issue before proceeding to the election. If they think it is o.k. to proceed as is, vote against this proposed lex, if they think we need a do-over, vote for it.
>
> My understanding of the naming conventions of the leges in Nova Roma is admittedly deficient. Therefore, I have not given a name to this lex, but appreciate anyone that can give it an appropriate name.
>
>
> Lucius Quintius Constantius
>
>
> Proposed new lex:
>
> [Insert name of lex]
>
> 1. The Consular Call for candidates for the office of Censor Suffectus, to supply the vacancy caused by the resignation of former Censor Gaius Popillius Laenas, issued by Consul Marcus Curiatius Complutensis, on ante diem X Kal. Mai, A.U.C. MMDCCLXII, in the consulship of Marcus Curiatus Complutensis and Marcus Iulius Severus, is hereby revoked and all proceedings held thereunder are hereby declared null and void.
>
> 2. The Consuls are hereby instructed to issue a new edictum calling for qualified candidates for the office of Censor Suffectus for the term ending December 31, MMDCCLXIII, to fill the vacancy caused by the reignation of former Censor Gaius Popillius Laenas.
>
> 3. The edictum referred to in paragraph 2 shall be issued within 72 hours of the approval of this lex.
>
> 4. If the edictum referred to in paragraph 3 is not issued within the time specified, the consuls are considered to have met the standard of "derelict in his duties" in IV.A. of the Constitution of Nova Roma, and the office of both Consuls is declared vacant.
>
> 5. Only if the terms in paragraph 4 are operative, the Senate is instructed to immediately select an interrex in the terms of the provisions of IV.B.2. of the Constitution of Nova Roma.
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65910 From: Timothy or Stephen Gallagher Date: 2009-05-23
Subject: Election Mess
Salve  Hubbie : )
 
If the President dies with less than two years of the term left the new President
can be elected to two full terms in his own right. If the President dies with two years or more left in the term the new president can only be elected to one full term in his own right. President Jerry Ford served more than two years of Nixon's second term and therefore could only have been elected one more time.
 
Vale
 
Paulinus
(a friend of the CFO)
 

 

To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
From: twboyle@...
Date: Sat, 23 May 2009 21:45:15 -0400
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: Open Letter to the Praetors: NO Election Mess



   Salve Maior,
 
If the President of the U.S. dies ie JFK and the VP finnishes his term dose that mean the VP can only run for one more term? I think not.
 
   Vale,
 
    CFOs Hubbie
 
ahh I can't remember my NR name  sorrrry!!
 
 
 
 
----- Original Message -----
From: Maior
Sent: Saturday, May 23, 2009 8:18 PM
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Open Letter to the Praetors: NO Election Mess

Maior Catoni sal;
what on earth are you talking about? There is no issue, except what you are trying to make up.As the consuls, praetors and tribunes are just fine with the situation. The entire ML seems to understand the meaning of 'consecutive' . We even had Agricola who is a professor of English with an MA in applied Linguistics post what the Oxford English dictionary says.

This is just another tiresome endless game as you so elegantly put it 'for shits and giggles'. And I, for one, am not playing.

back to my Latin exam.
bene valet in pacem deorum
M. Hortensia Maior
>
> Cato Maiori sal.
>
> Salve!
>
> If the President of the United States breaks the law, the law is still broken.
>
> There most certainly *is* a question. Just because you don't like the question doesn't mean it doesn't exist.
>
> Vale,
>
> Cato
>
>
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com, "Maior" <rory12001@> wrote:
> >
> > M. Hortensia G. Equitio sal;
> > actually there is no question about this whatsoever,the consuls, praetors and tribunes have all certified both candidates.
> >
> > I suggest you post positive things about yourself Cato to get people to vote for you, than try to create a faux legal fuss.
> >
> > Now back to my Latin exam!
> > optime vale
> > M. Hortensia Maior
> >
> > >
> > > Cato Quinto Constantio sal.
> > >
> > > Salve!
> > >
> > > The election process is legal and valid; that has never been in question. There is some question about the validity of one of the candidates' being able to stand for the office.
> > >
> > > Vale!
> > >
> > > Cato
> > >
> > >
> > > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com, "Roger" <politicog@> wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > So has Contio closed and the election begun? I may have missed the message stating that. If Contio has closed, then I will withdraw my request to the Praetors for the proposed lex.
> > > >
> > > > If it has closed, could someone please give me the message number. Thanks.
> > > >
> > > > If it has not closed, then the election has not yet started, and it not *yet* in the hands of the people. The whole purpose of using this as a proposed solution, is that is allows the whole NR citizenship to decide whether or not the election in valid.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Lucius Quintius Constantius
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com, "D. Boyle" <deandreaboyle@ > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Equestria Iunia Laeca L. Quintio Constantio sal.
> > > > >
> > > > > There is no election mess. We have two perfectly legal candidates for
> > > > > Censor Suffectus. The Tribunes, Consuls, and Praetors have all
> > > > > validated this. Now, the power has been given to the people to decide.
> > > > >
> > > > > Vale.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On May 23, 2009, at 10:04 AM, Roger wrote:
> > > > > > Considering the issues raised in the current debate on the Censor
> > > > > > Suffectus election mess
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>



Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65911 From: Q. Valerius Poplicola Date: 2009-05-23
Subject: Re: Open Letter to the Praetors: NO Election Mess
Why are the praetores allowing this post to go unactioned when they denied my post that had the same word in it from even appearing here?

[Moderator's note: Maior is not moderated; there is no way to prevent her from posting these Back Alley expressions unless she exercises the self-control some lack].

And for the sake of all the gods, please, Maior, quit playing. You're so annoying, and I wish you'd actually make good on your word and just leave Nova Roma politics for good.

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Maior" <rory12001@...> wrote:
>
> Maior Catoni sal;
> what on earth are you talking about? There is no issue, except what you are trying to make up.As the consuls, praetors and tribunes are just fine with the situation. The entire ML seems to understand the meaning of 'consecutive'. We even had Agricola who is a professor of English with an MA in applied Linguistics post what the Oxford English dictionary says.
>
> This is just another tiresome endless game as you so elegantly put it 'for ... and giggles'. And I, for one, am not playing.

[ brief excision]
>
> back to my Latin exam.
> bene valet in pacem deorum
> M. Hortensia Maior
> >
> > Cato Maiori sal.
> >
> > Salve!
> >
> > If the President of the United States breaks the law, the law is still broken.
> >
> > There most certainly *is* a question. Just because you don't like the question doesn't mean it doesn't exist.
> >
> > Vale,
> >
> > Cato
> >
> >
> >
> > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Maior" <rory12001@> wrote:
> > >
> > > M. Hortensia G. Equitio sal;
> > > actually there is no question about this whatsoever,the consuls, praetors and tribunes have all certified both candidates.
> > >
> > > I suggest you post positive things about yourself Cato to get people to vote for you, than try to create a faux legal fuss.
> > >
> > > Now back to my Latin exam!
> > > optime vale
> > > M. Hortensia Maior
> > >
> > > >
> > > > Cato Quinto Constantio sal.
> > > >
> > > > Salve!
> > > >
> > > > The election process is legal and valid; that has never been in question. There is some question about the validity of one of the candidates' being able to stand for the office.
> > > >
> > > > Vale!
> > > >
> > > > Cato
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Roger" <politicog@> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > So has Contio closed and the election begun? I may have missed the message stating that. If Contio has closed, then I will withdraw my request to the Praetors for the proposed lex.
> > > > >
> > > > > If it has closed, could someone please give me the message number. Thanks.
> > > > >
> > > > > If it has not closed, then the election has not yet started, and it not *yet* in the hands of the people. The whole purpose of using this as a proposed solution, is that is allows the whole NR citizenship to decide whether or not the election in valid.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Lucius Quintius Constantius
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "D. Boyle" <deandreaboyle@> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Equestria Iunia Laeca L. Quintio Constantio sal.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > There is no election mess. We have two perfectly legal candidates for
> > > > > > Censor Suffectus. The Tribunes, Consuls, and Praetors have all
> > > > > > validated this. Now, the power has been given to the people to decide.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Vale.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On May 23, 2009, at 10:04 AM, Roger wrote:
> > > > > > > Considering the issues raised in the current debate on the Censor
> > > > > > > Suffectus election mess
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65912 From: Q. Valerius Poplicola Date: 2009-05-23
Subject: Consecutive Terms
Q. Poplicola omnibus sal.

Just for illustrative purposes... Let me remind you that I'm on moderation, this is posted at 8:33 PM Eastern Standard Time...

Censores have overlapping terms, so that one person gets elected for two years, and in the middle of his term year another person gets elected to the other censor position.

A1 - Modianus is elected
A2 - Galerius is elected
B1 - Laenas is elected
During B1, Laenas quits. Since A1 cannot equal A2 (he can't get elected to both censor positions), A2 isn't consecutive to A1. So that leaves B1 as what is consecutive to A1. So A1, B1, C1, that's the pattern.

If Modianus is elected to B1, he'd be breaking the law, since he can't serve consecutive terms.

If he continues to act dishonorably and without regard to the law, then may the Gods help this already ill organization.

That is all I have said and that is all I will say about this matter.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65913 From: Timothy or Stephen Gallagher Date: 2009-05-23
Subject: Election Mess
Salvete
 
Voting does not start until the 25th of May.
 
Vale
 
Paulinus
 

To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
From: politicog@...
Date: Sat, 23 May 2009 16:37:00 -0700
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: Open Letter to the Praetors: Possible Solution for Election Mess




Praetor,

Thanks for the reply. But as I previously stated, since Contio is now over, and the vote has begun, the request was withdrawn.

Lucius Quintius Constantius

--- On Sat, 5/23/09, Publius Memmius Albucius <albucius_aoe@ hotmail.com> wrote:

> From: Publius Memmius Albucius <albucius_aoe@ hotmail.com>
> Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Open Letter to the Praetors: Possible Solution for Election Mess
> To: Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com
> Date: Saturday, May 23, 2009, 7:31 PM
> Lucio Quintio Constantio s.d.
>
> We praetors acknowledge good receipt of your open letter.
>
> Unhappily, without we need to examine the matter of your
> request, how interesting or grounded it might be, I must
> inform you that the praetors are authorized, by our
> constitution, to convene the comitia centuriata in the sole
> case of the unavaibility of both consuls.
> As currently, neither Consul Curiatius nor Consul Iulius
> are unavailable, the praetors cannot give a positive answer
> to your request.
>
> Vale Constanti,
>
>
> P. Memmius Albucius
> praetor
>
>
>
>


Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65914 From: pompeia_minucia_tiberia Date: 2009-05-23
Subject: Test
Haven't used this addie in a few years...I unsubbed the other ones because I've been busy with a course, life, etc.

Pompeia
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65915 From: Terry Boyle Date: 2009-05-23
Subject: Re: Election Mess
Salve Paulinus

Thank you that was very helpful. I love to learn new thiings,
and I do not mind being reeducated. Its funny now that you mention it I do
remember this fact.

Vale,

QID (Quintus Iunius Dominicus - Thank you to Equestria for reminding
me)


P.S. NR names are soooo long.


----- Original Message -----
From: Timothy or Stephen Gallagher
To: Nova-Roma
Sent: Saturday, May 23, 2009 10:01 PM
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Election Mess


Salve Hubbie : )

If the President dies with less than two years of the term left the new
President
can be elected to two full terms in his own right. If the President dies
with two years or more left in the term the new president can only be
elected to one full term in his own right. President Jerry Ford served more
than two years of Nixon's second term and therefore could only have been
elected one more time.

Vale

Paulinus
(a friend of the CFO)


To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
From: twboyle@...
Date: Sat, 23 May 2009 21:45:15 -0400
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: Open Letter to the Praetors: NO Election Mess

Salve Maior,

If the President of the U.S. dies ie JFK and the VP finnishes his term dose
that mean the VP can only run for one more term? I think not.

Vale,
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65916 From: pompeia_minucia_tiberia Date: 2009-05-23
Subject: Consecutive Terms
Pompeia Quiritibus S.P.D.

Now, I haven't been a very attentive citizen lately due to other commitments (I see I even missed the deadline for taxes) so I don't have much voting power in this either way, but I'll give my honest opinion, which I'm sure will meet with disagreement (I'm used to this), but anyway:

The law reads:


1. No person shall hold the office of censor *consecutively* OR *more than twice* in a *five-year* period.

My humble take:

The law doesn't mandate a specific interval of time between occasions an individual may hold the office of Censor, it just says 'consecutively'. Was Modianus his own predecessor? No, I'm afraid it was Laenus. So, it cannot be said that Modianus is running 'consecutively', consecutively, meaning 'back to back', 'without interruption'.

The law doesn't say " a period of no less than 12 consecutive months must separate the two terms a Censor may hold office in a five year period" (or other synonymous language) it just says 'consecutively'.
Since Modianus had a predecessor other than himself, and in the absence of any other defining language in the lex, I must default to the meaning of the word 'consecutive' and say that he is not running 'consecutively'


The law continues (with respect to Censors):


"This exception to this provision shall be any censor suffectus who has served 6 months or less of his predecessor's term of office."


Now, given that Modianus would be serving *more* than six months as a suffectus, it stands that this term, if he's elected, will count toward that second term in five years.

And please take note that this quoted clause above, acknowledges a resigned or partial term censor (Laenus) as a "predecessor" to the "suffectus" (Modianus); so it's even harder for me to label Modianus' terms as "consecutive". Twice in five years, yes, but not 'consecutive'. How can one run consecutively with a predecessor?

I'm afraid I don't see a 'cut and dry' opposition to the law on the part of the Consuls here, sorry. I don't like to see people jerked around, and I've been very vocal about saying so, especially last year, but I honestly don't see where Modianus should be disqualified from running on the basis of this law.

And, although I haven't read through all the posts, I am assuming that this issue was raised to the Tribunes a little bit sooner than the last few days or so?

Valete
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65917 From: deciusiunius Date: 2009-05-23
Subject: Re: Candidacy!
--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "L Julia Aquila" <dis_pensible@...> wrote:
>
> Salve Pallidio,

Salve Iulia,

>Thank you for the correction but I addressed you in the dative, not >vocative, which is correct after "Salve".

Sorry. I've always seen the vocative used with "salve" but you may be right it can also be used with the dative. I'll leave that to one of our Latinists.

> Now this is funny!*laugh*
> One point you do not seem to understand. I belong to no party and >have made no partisan statements. Particularly in this thread. Quite >frankly you and your friends from the back alley demonstrate >behavior of bullies.

Frankly I've been quite taken aback by your tone in this entire exchange, as the more I try to moderate it you worse you become. That's why this medium is horrible for true communication, because hopefully in person people wouldn't treat each other like this. Bully? Now that's something I've NEVER been called in Nova Roma. Ask around before you toss such labels, you'll see it doesn't stick.

Yes, I realize you didn't like my laughing at the notion, as I understood you to be implying, of a connection between an appointment as scribe and a public statement. I'm sorry if you were offended but you seem to think I was commenting for political purpose, to affect the censors' race presumably. If you thought that you would be wrong, I have no dog in that fight and like many others in this forum, back neither candidate. My comment is about the general silly tenor of Nova Roman politics.

> I do not plan to run for any candidacy in 2010 or at anytime.
> Words are powerful no matter how you like to downplay them.

They can be, but don't overplay their importance either.

Vale bene,

Palladius
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65918 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2009-05-23
Subject: Re: Open Letter to the Praetors: NO Election Mess
Cato Maiori sal.

Salve!

You are living in a fantasy world, Maior.

Several magistrates, including at least three of the tribunes, and many citizens have voiced their clear opinion that there *is* a very serious question of validity here; in fact that the candidacy is invalid.

You may consider obedience to the law "playing". I do not.

Vale!

Cato


--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Maior" <rory12001@...> wrote:
>
> Maior Catoni sal;
> what on earth are you talking about? There is no issue, except what you are trying to make up.As the consuls, praetors and tribunes are just fine with the situation. The entire ML seems to understand the meaning of 'consecutive'. We even had Agricola who is a professor of English with an MA in applied Linguistics post what the Oxford English dictionary says.
>
> This is just another tiresome endless game as you so elegantly put it 'for shits and giggles'. And I, for one, am not playing.
>
> back to my Latin exam.
> bene valet in pacem deorum
> M. Hortensia Maior
> >
> > Cato Maiori sal.
> >
> > Salve!
> >
> > If the President of the United States breaks the law, the law is still broken.
> >
> > There most certainly *is* a question. Just because you don't like the question doesn't mean it doesn't exist.
> >
> > Vale,
> >
> > Cato
> >
> >
> >
> > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Maior" <rory12001@> wrote:
> > >
> > > M. Hortensia G. Equitio sal;
> > > actually there is no question about this whatsoever,the consuls, praetors and tribunes have all certified both candidates.
> > >
> > > I suggest you post positive things about yourself Cato to get people to vote for you, than try to create a faux legal fuss.
> > >
> > > Now back to my Latin exam!
> > > optime vale
> > > M. Hortensia Maior
> > >
> > > >
> > > > Cato Quinto Constantio sal.
> > > >
> > > > Salve!
> > > >
> > > > The election process is legal and valid; that has never been in question. There is some question about the validity of one of the candidates' being able to stand for the office.
> > > >
> > > > Vale!
> > > >
> > > > Cato
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Roger" <politicog@> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > So has Contio closed and the election begun? I may have missed the message stating that. If Contio has closed, then I will withdraw my request to the Praetors for the proposed lex.
> > > > >
> > > > > If it has closed, could someone please give me the message number. Thanks.
> > > > >
> > > > > If it has not closed, then the election has not yet started, and it not *yet* in the hands of the people. The whole purpose of using this as a proposed solution, is that is allows the whole NR citizenship to decide whether or not the election in valid.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Lucius Quintius Constantius
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "D. Boyle" <deandreaboyle@> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Equestria Iunia Laeca L. Quintio Constantio sal.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > There is no election mess. We have two perfectly legal candidates for
> > > > > > Censor Suffectus. The Tribunes, Consuls, and Praetors have all
> > > > > > validated this. Now, the power has been given to the people to decide.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Vale.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On May 23, 2009, at 10:04 AM, Roger wrote:
> > > > > > > Considering the issues raised in the current debate on the Censor
> > > > > > > Suffectus election mess
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65919 From: deciusiunius Date: 2009-05-23
Subject: Re: Consecutive Terms
Salve Po, glad to see you back (I say on the verge of an extended absence but I'll be back)

After reading your comments, Iunia Laeca's and others, and mulling them over for sometime, I have to agree the law can reasonably be read the way you read it. There is no reference to term, only the person holding the office.

Having written the law I know it was *meant* to prevent just such a situation as Modianus is in, but we must take the law as it is written, not as the author knows it was supposed to do, and I failed to anticipate all situations and write them in there specifically. Mea culpa, mea culpa, mea maxima culpa. The law as read allows Modinaus to run. Whether he should is a different question, but the law allows it.

Vale bene,

Palladius




--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "pompeia_minucia_tiberia" <scriba_forum@...> wrote:
>
> Pompeia Quiritibus S.P.D.
>
> Now, I haven't been a very attentive citizen lately due to other commitments (I see I even missed the deadline for taxes) so I don't have much voting power in this either way, but I'll give my honest opinion, which I'm sure will meet with disagreement (I'm used to this), but anyway:
>
> The law reads:
>
>
> 1. No person shall hold the office of censor *consecutively* OR *more than twice* in a *five-year* period.
>
> My humble take:
>
> The law doesn't mandate a specific interval of time between occasions an individual may hold the office of Censor, it just says 'consecutively'. Was Modianus his own predecessor? No, I'm afraid it was Laenus. So, it cannot be said that Modianus is running 'consecutively', consecutively, meaning 'back to back', 'without interruption'.
>
> The law doesn't say " a period of no less than 12 consecutive months must separate the two terms a Censor may hold office in a five year period" (or other synonymous language) it just says 'consecutively'.
> Since Modianus had a predecessor other than himself, and in the absence of any other defining language in the lex, I must default to the meaning of the word 'consecutive' and say that he is not running 'consecutively'
>
>
> The law continues (with respect to Censors):
>
>
> "This exception to this provision shall be any censor suffectus who has served 6 months or less of his predecessor's term of office."
>
>
> Now, given that Modianus would be serving *more* than six months as a suffectus, it stands that this term, if he's elected, will count toward that second term in five years.
>
> And please take note that this quoted clause above, acknowledges a resigned or partial term censor (Laenus) as a "predecessor" to the "suffectus" (Modianus); so it's even harder for me to label Modianus' terms as "consecutive". Twice in five years, yes, but not 'consecutive'. How can one run consecutively with a predecessor?
>
> I'm afraid I don't see a 'cut and dry' opposition to the law on the part of the Consuls here, sorry. I don't like to see people jerked around, and I've been very vocal about saying so, especially last year, but I honestly don't see where Modianus should be disqualified from running on the basis of this law.
>
> And, although I haven't read through all the posts, I am assuming that this issue was raised to the Tribunes a little bit sooner than the last few days or so?
>
> Valete
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65920 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2009-05-23
Subject: Re: Consecutive Terms
Cato P. Minuciae Straboni sal.

Salve!

The argument being made is that the law refers to the terms of office. Think of it like this, instead:

TERM I: Modianus & Paulinus

TERM II: Paulinus & Laeneas, now Paulinus and _______________

Laenas left, needing a person to serve the remainder of TERM II

TERM I and TERM II are in fact consecutive.

Vale!

Cato
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65921 From: pompeia_minucia_tiberia Date: 2009-05-24
Subject: Re: Consecutive Terms
---Salve Palladius Senator, Salve Iuliae Aquilae, Salvete Omnes:

Senator I can certainly understand the rationale and intentions behind the law, both historical and practical, and as far as being able to forsee every potential variable when writing a law...well if we could do that, we'd have the income of Bill Gates:>). But be it your law, or that of another author and promulgant, magistrates reading it years down the road are, for better or worse, obligated to what's written, rather than what was intended.

BTW, I do not believe you deserved such a nasty retort as is copied below.....


You assume and so you are,
essentially, what the first three letters in assume spell. Of course since you
are that, it only follows that you can only percieve from your narrow
experiences and from your own devious way you proceed in the daily activities of
your life.

Vale,
L. Iulia Aquila

Hmmm...

Senator Palladius deviously proceeds in the activities of his daily life? Now who's ASSuming? Can you base this on any fact? 'deviously proceeds in the activities of his daily life?' You have a tail on him, do you? :>)
Julia, with respect you should tone it down a bit. I can't believe you are truly like this in person.

Valete
Pompeia









In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "deciusiunius" <bcatfd@...> wrote:
>
>
> Salve Po, glad to see you back (I say on the verge of an extended absence but I'll be back)
>
> After reading your comments, Iunia Laeca's and others, and mulling them over for sometime, I have to agree the law can reasonably be read the way you read it. There is no reference to term, only the person holding the office.
>
> Having written the law I know it was *meant* to prevent just such a situation as Modianus is in, but we must take the law as it is written, not as the author knows it was supposed to do, and I failed to anticipate all situations and write them in there specifically. Mea culpa, mea culpa, mea maxima culpa. The law as read allows Modinaus to run. Whether he should is a different question, but the law allows it.
>
> Vale bene,
>
> Palladius
>
>
>
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "pompeia_minucia_tiberia" <scriba_forum@> wrote:
> >
> > Pompeia Quiritibus S.P.D.
> >
> > Now, I haven't been a very attentive citizen lately due to other commitments (I see I even missed the deadline for taxes) so I don't have much voting power in this either way, but I'll give my honest opinion, which I'm sure will meet with disagreement (I'm used to this), but anyway:
> >
> > The law reads:
> >
> >
> > 1. No person shall hold the office of censor *consecutively* OR *more than twice* in a *five-year* period.
> >
> > My humble take:
> >
> > The law doesn't mandate a specific interval of time between occasions an individual may hold the office of Censor, it just says 'consecutively'. Was Modianus his own predecessor? No, I'm afraid it was Laenus. So, it cannot be said that Modianus is running 'consecutively', consecutively, meaning 'back to back', 'without interruption'.
> >
> > The law doesn't say " a period of no less than 12 consecutive months must separate the two terms a Censor may hold office in a five year period" (or other synonymous language) it just says 'consecutively'.
> > Since Modianus had a predecessor other than himself, and in the absence of any other defining language in the lex, I must default to the meaning of the word 'consecutive' and say that he is not running 'consecutively'
> >
> >
> > The law continues (with respect to Censors):
> >
> >
> > "This exception to this provision shall be any censor suffectus who has served 6 months or less of his predecessor's term of office."
> >
> >
> > Now, given that Modianus would be serving *more* than six months as a suffectus, it stands that this term, if he's elected, will count toward that second term in five years.
> >
> > And please take note that this quoted clause above, acknowledges a resigned or partial term censor (Laenus) as a "predecessor" to the "suffectus" (Modianus); so it's even harder for me to label Modianus' terms as "consecutive". Twice in five years, yes, but not 'consecutive'. How can one run consecutively with a predecessor?
> >
> > I'm afraid I don't see a 'cut and dry' opposition to the law on the part of the Consuls here, sorry. I don't like to see people jerked around, and I've been very vocal about saying so, especially last year, but I honestly don't see where Modianus should be disqualified from running on the basis of this law.
> >
> > And, although I haven't read through all the posts, I am assuming that this issue was raised to the Tribunes a little bit sooner than the last few days or so?
> >
> > Valete
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65922 From: Terry Boyle Date: 2009-05-24
Subject: Re: Consecutive Terms
   Salve Palladius
 
      This clearly is not your fault. When you write a law you do with all good intentions. The law does not truly get tested until something like this particular situation
 
 
 
      Vale
      
         QID
 
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Saturday, May 23, 2009 11:54 PM
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Consecutive Terms


Salve Po, glad to see you back (I say on the verge of an extended absence but I'll be back)

After reading your comments, Iunia Laeca's and others, and mulling them over for sometime, I have to agree the law can reasonably be read the way you read it. There is no reference to term, only the person holding the office.

Having written the law I know it was *meant* to prevent just such a situation as Modianus is in, but we must take the law as it is written, not as the author knows it was supposed to do, and I failed to anticipate all situations and write them in there specifically. Mea culpa, mea culpa, mea maxima culpa. The law as read allows Modinaus to run. Whether he should is a different question, but the law allows it.

Vale bene,

Palladius

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com, "pompeia_minucia_ tiberia" <scriba_forum@ ...> wrote:
>
> Pompeia Quiritibus S.P.D.
>
> Now, I haven't been a very attentive citizen lately due to other commitments (I see I even missed the deadline for taxes) so I don't have much voting power in this either way, but I'll give my honest opinion, which I'm sure will meet with disagreement (I'm used to this), but anyway:
>
> The law reads:
>
>
> 1. No person shall hold the office of censor *consecutively* OR *more than twice* in a *five-year* period.
>
> My humble take:
>
> The law doesn't mandate a specific interval of time between occasions an individual may hold the office of Censor, it just says 'consecutively' . Was Modianus his own predecessor? No, I'm afraid it was Laenus. So, it cannot be said that Modianus is running 'consecutively' , consecutively, meaning 'back to back', 'without interruption' .
>
> The law doesn't say " a period of no less than 12 consecutive months must separate the two terms a Censor may hold office in a five year period" (or other synonymous language) it just says 'consecutively' .
> Since Modianus had a predecessor other than himself, and in the absence of any other defining language in the lex, I must default to the meaning of the word 'consecutive' and say that he is not running 'consecutively'
>
>
> The law continues (with respect to Censors):
>
>
> "This exception to this provision shall be any censor suffectus who has served 6 months or less of his predecessor' s term of office."
>
>
> Now, given that Modianus would be serving *more* than six months as a suffectus, it stands that this term, if he's elected, will count toward that second term in five years.
>
> And please take note that this quoted clause above, acknowledges a resigned or partial term censor (Laenus) as a "predecessor" to the "suffectus" (Modianus); so it's even harder for me to label Modianus' terms as "consecutive" . Twice in five years, yes, but not 'consecutive' . How can one run consecutively with a predecessor?
>
> I'm afraid I don't see a 'cut and dry' opposition to the law on the part of the Consuls here, sorry. I don't like to see people jerked around, and I've been very vocal about saying so, especially last year, but I honestly don't see where Modianus should be disqualified from running on the basis of this law.
>
> And, although I haven't read through all the posts, I am assuming that this issue was raised to the Tribunes a little bit sooner than the last few days or so?
>
> Valete
>

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65923 From: pompeia_minucia_tiberia Date: 2009-05-24
Subject: Re: Consecutive Terms
---Po Minucia Catoni:



Ok...if you want me to 'think' things in the context of terms of office, ok, I can; let us look at the only clause in the law that assigns the word 'term':


.." exception to this provision shall be any censor suffectus who has served
6 months or less of his predecessor's term of office."

His *predecessor's term of office*. The term in question is assigned to the Predecessor (Laenus), not the Suffectus (Modianus). If you choose to regard the term in question as belonging to Modianus, that's fine, but I'm afraid the law herein, legally assigns it to Laenus.

**By the above law, this year is part of Laenus' term, not Modianus'.
**By the above law, Laenus is called 'predecessor', so Modianus' service in office as Censor is not 'consecutive'.

Vale












In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Gaius Equitius Cato" <mlcinnyc@...> wrote:
>
> Cato P. Minuciae Straboni sal.
>
> Salve!
>
> The argument being made is that the law refers to the terms of office. Think of it like this, instead:
>
> TERM I: Modianus & Paulinus
>
> TERM II: Paulinus & Laeneas, now Paulinus and _______________
>
> Laenas left, needing a person to serve the remainder of TERM II
>
> TERM I and TERM II are in fact consecutive.
>
> Vale!
>
> Cato
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65924 From: QFabiusMaxmi@aol.com Date: 2009-05-24
Subject: Re: Both candidates for Censor Suffectus are valid candidates (AW: [
In a message dated 5/23/2009 8:50:21 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time, titus.aquila@... writes:
Both candidates are valid to run for the Censor Suffectus position !
IN YOUR OPINION!
 
Remember People of Nova Roma, We have proven that only one candidate is viable, the other is in violation of term limits, no matter what the others say.  Just because they are magistrates does not make them right, no matter what they try to do to convince you.  Read the Law.  And decide.
 
The only LEGAL choice available is Iulius Cato.
 
Q. Fabius Maximus     
 
 
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65926 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2009-05-24
Subject: Re: Consecutive Terms
Cato Minuciae Straboni sal.

Salve!

The clause you are referring to has to do with a suffectus who has served the *end* of a *previous* term of office, not a suffectus coming into the beginning of an existent term of office.

Vale!

Cato


--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "pompeia_minucia_tiberia" <scriba_forum@...> wrote:
>
> ---Po Minucia Catoni:
>
>
>
> Ok...if you want me to 'think' things in the context of terms of office, ok, I can; let us look at the only clause in the law that assigns the word 'term':
>
>
> .." exception to this provision shall be any censor suffectus who has served
> 6 months or less of his predecessor's term of office."
>
> His *predecessor's term of office*. The term in question is assigned to the Predecessor (Laenus), not the Suffectus (Modianus). If you choose to regard the term in question as belonging to Modianus, that's fine, but I'm afraid the law herein, legally assigns it to Laenus.
>
> **By the above law, this year is part of Laenus' term, not Modianus'.
> **By the above law, Laenus is called 'predecessor', so Modianus' service in office as Censor is not 'consecutive'.
>
> Vale
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Gaius Equitius Cato" <mlcinnyc@> wrote:
> >
> > Cato P. Minuciae Straboni sal.
> >
> > Salve!
> >
> > The argument being made is that the law refers to the terms of office. Think of it like this, instead:
> >
> > TERM I: Modianus & Paulinus
> >
> > TERM II: Paulinus & Laeneas, now Paulinus and _______________
> >
> > Laenas left, needing a person to serve the remainder of TERM II
> >
> > TERM I and TERM II are in fact consecutive.
> >
> > Vale!
> >
> > Cato
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65927 From: Gnaeus Iulius Caesar Date: 2009-05-24
Subject: Re: Consecutive Terms
Cn. Iulius Caesar SPD.
 
The dictionary definition of the word consecutive can only be read though in the context of what it applies to. Section 1 of the Lex Cornelia Iunia de definitione intervallorum magistratuum states:
 
"No person shall hold the office of censor consecutively"
 
Therefore in order to understand the use of the word consecutive one has to look to what is applies to, namely "the office of censor". Consecutive as a word does not stand on its own, it is applied in the law to "the office of censor"
 
The Constitution commences in Section IV.A. "Should an office in mid-term become vacant and suitable candidates be at hand, an election shall be held in the appropriate comitia to elect a successor to serve out the remainder of the term within thirty days of the vacancy". Therefore the Constitution, our highest legal authority defines office in relation to term.
 
Section IV.A.1 of the Constitution states "Censor. Two censors shall be elected by the comitia centuriata to serve a term lasting two years, to be elected in alternate years so as to have a one-year overlap of terms".
 
Note the Constitution says "a term", it does not say 'terms". Therefore the Constitution only speaks to one term for each Censor.
 
In IV.A the suffectus or successor as defined in the Constitution is elected to fill the "remainder of the term". That means the remainder of the term of his or her predecessor who has vacated the office of censor. 
 
Therefore the office of censor is linked to ONE term of that office, and that office is specified by the Constitution as being for a period of 2 years.
 
Section 1.B of the Constitution states "Should a lower authority conflict with a higher authority, the higher authority shall take precedence".
 
The Constitution is higher in the chain of legal authority than a lex. Therefore even though the Lex Cornelia Iunia de definitione intervallorum magistratuum does not specify a definition of what the "office of censor" means, the Constitution does, and therefore the definition provided by the constitution takes precedence over the absence of a definition in the lex. That also means a pure application of the dictionary definition is no longer possible, as the Constitution provides guidance.
 
Therefore ""No person shall hold the office of censor consecutively" by virtue of the Constitution means that no person shall hold the office of censor, which is defined as being a SINGLE term regardless of whether some resigns or not, consecutively.
 
Therefore you apply consecutively to the single term of office that has been vacated by the predecessor.
 
Therefore the assertion that Laenas' term breaks the consecutive chain is not only wrong, it is unconstitutional.
 
Therefore Modianus cannot serve as Censor for the remainder of Laenas' term, for to do so would be illegal by virtue of the law and the Constitution.
 
Optime valete
 
 

Sent: Saturday, May 23, 2009 10:23 PM
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Consecutive Terms

---Po Minucia Catoni:



Ok...if you want me  to 'think' things in the context of terms of office, ok, I can;  let us look at the only clause in the law that assigns the word 'term':


 .." exception to this provision shall be any censor suffectus who has served
6 months or less of his predecessor's term of office."

His *predecessor's term of office*.  The term in question is assigned to the Predecessor (Laenus), not the Suffectus (Modianus).  If you choose to regard the term in question as belonging to Modianus, that's fine, but I'm afraid the law herein, legally assigns it to Laenus.

**By the above law, this year is part of Laenus' term, not Modianus'.
**By the above law, Laenus is called 'predecessor', so Modianus' service in office as Censor is not 'consecutive'.

Vale












 In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Gaius Equitius Cato" <mlcinnyc@...> wrote:
>
> Cato P. Minuciae
Straboni sal.
>
> Salve!
>
> The argument being made
is that the law refers to the terms of office. Think of it like this, instead:
>
> TERM I: Modianus & Paulinus
>
> TERM
II: Paulinus & Laeneas, now Paulinus and _______________
>
>
Laenas left, needing a person to serve the remainder of TERM II
>
>
TERM I and TERM II are in fact consecutive.
>
> Vale!
>
>
Cato
>




------------------------------------

Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo..com/group/Nova-Roma/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    mailto:Nova-Roma-digest@yahoogroups.com
    mailto:Nova-Roma-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65928 From: pompeia_minucia_tiberia Date: 2009-05-24
Subject: Re: Consecutive Terms
---Salve Cato, Salvete Omnes:

I do grasp the central theme of the clause, but thank you.

Cato, you asked me to examine the law in context of 'terms of office' and upon looking at the lex again, that's the best I could do. One admittedly subordinate, but nonetheless present reference to the incompleted term of office belonging to the predecessor, not the suffectus.

I think we are actually in agreement in light of the above: It would seem that any legal dispute concerning terms of office 'per se' might be platformed on rather thin ice.

Valete
Pompeia

In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Gaius Equitius Cato" <mlcinnyc@...> wrote:
>
> Cato Minuciae Straboni sal.
>
> Salve!
>
> The clause you are referring to has to do with a suffectus who has served the *end* of a *previous* term of office, not a suffectus coming into the beginning of an existent term of office.
>
> Vale!
>
> Cato
>
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "pompeia_minucia_tiberia" <scriba_forum@> wrote:
> >
> > ---Po Minucia Catoni:
> >
> >
> >
> > Ok...if you want me to 'think' things in the context of terms of office, ok, I can; let us look at the only clause in the law that assigns the word 'term':
> >
> >
> > .." exception to this provision shall be any censor suffectus who has served
> > 6 months or less of his predecessor's term of office."
> >
> > His *predecessor's term of office*. The term in question is assigned to the Predecessor (Laenus), not the Suffectus (Modianus). If you choose to regard the term in question as belonging to Modianus, that's fine, but I'm afraid the law herein, legally assigns it to Laenus.
> >
> > **By the above law, this year is part of Laenus' term, not Modianus'.
> > **By the above law, Laenus is called 'predecessor', so Modianus' service in office as Censor is not 'consecutive'.
> >
> > Vale
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Gaius Equitius Cato" <mlcinnyc@> wrote:
> > >
> > > Cato P. Minuciae Straboni sal.
> > >
> > > Salve!
> > >
> > > The argument being made is that the law refers to the terms of office. Think of it like this, instead:
> > >
> > > TERM I: Modianus & Paulinus
> > >
> > > TERM II: Paulinus & Laeneas, now Paulinus and _______________
> > >
> > > Laenas left, needing a person to serve the remainder of TERM II
> > >
> > > TERM I and TERM II are in fact consecutive.
> > >
> > > Vale!
> > >
> > > Cato
> > >
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65929 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2009-05-24
Subject: Re: Candidacy!
Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: Candidacy!

  A. Tullia Scholastica D. Iunio Palladio Invicto quiritibus, sociis, peregrinisque bonae voluntatis S.P.D.

  

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com <mailto:Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com> , "L Julia Aquila" <dis_pensible@...> wrote:
>
> Salve Pallidio,

Salve Iulia,

>Thank you for the correction but I addressed you in the dative, not >vocative, which is correct after "Salve".

Sorry. I've always seen the vocative used with "salve" but you may be right it can also be used with the dative. I'll leave that to one of our Latinists.

    ATS:  You are absolutely correct, Palladi.  The dative is used with the formal SPD salutation (and variations), as the indirect object of the verb dicit, represented by the letter D; salutem, represented by the letter S, is the direct object.  The dative is used for the indirect object in Latin, as well as the complement of certain adjectives and as the direct object of some verbs.  The vocative is used with the less formal Salve(te)/ave(te) greetings, as I informed Aquila privatim.  However, the vocative is, as you probably are aware, identical with the nominative in most Latin substantives, but differs in the masculine ones ending in -us and -ius.  There the common -us termination becomes -e, and the nomen marker -ius becomes -i.

> Now this is funny!*laugh*
> One point you do not seem to understand. I belong to no party and >have made no partisan statements. Particularly in this thread. Quite >frankly you and your friends from the back alley demonstrate >behavior of bullies.

Frankly I've been quite taken aback by your tone in this entire exchange, as the more I try to moderate it you worse you become. That's why this medium is horrible for true communication, because hopefully in person people wouldn't treat each other like this. Bully? Now that's something I've NEVER been called in Nova Roma. Ask around before you toss such labels, you'll see it doesn't stick.

    ATS:  I would point out that I have met Palladius, who is a tall and dignified New Englander.    He does not impress me as a bully, though some of his political pals on the BA might bear that label more deservedly.  

Yes, I realize you didn't like my laughing at the notion, as I understood you to be implying, of a connection between an appointment as scribe and a public statement.

    ATS:  While I don’t recall who said what here, it is unfortunately true that there are cases where one is punished for speaking one’s mind, even when insubordination and the like are not involved.    

I'm sorry if you were offended but you seem to think I was commenting for political purpose, to affect the censors' race presumably. If you thought that you would be wrong, I have no dog in that fight and like many others in this forum, back neither candidate. My comment is about the general silly tenor of Nova Roman politics.

> I do not plan to run for any candidacy in 2010 or at anytime.
> Words are powerful no matter how you like to downplay them.

They can be, but don't overplay their importance either.

Vale bene,

Palladius

  Vale, et valete.  
    
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65930 From: Jennifer Harris Date: 2009-05-24
Subject: Re: R. Cornelia Aeternia aka Tink's moderation
Salve Julia,

Thank you for your promptness in the matter it is appreciated....

Vale,
R.Cornelia Aeternia



On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 12:34 PM, L Julia Aquila
<dis_pensible@...> wrote:
>
>
> L. Iulia Aquila R. Corneliae Aeterniae S.P.D.
>
> I have notified the Praetores on your behalf. This may take a little while
> as one of the Praetores is on personal leave.
> I thank you for your patience in this matter.
>
> Optime vale,
> L. Iulia Aquila
>
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65931 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2009-05-24
Subject: Re: Sulla's rebuttal - Re: Nova-Roma is my life (Was:The Cancer of
Re: [Nova-Roma] Sulla's rebuttal - Re: Nova-Roma is my life (Was:The  Cancer of Nova Roma)

  
A. Tullia Scholastica K. Fabio Buteoni Modiano Jesse Corradino quiritibus, sociis, peregrinisque bonae voluntatis S.P.D.
  

I have a friend who teaches philosophy at a community college and adjuncts at another college.  Between the two he teaches probably 5 courses a quarter; however, at the two institutions I'm most familiar with tenured faculty teach no more than 3 courses a quarter/semester and typically only teach 2 at a time.  At the school I am at now it alternates one semester 2 courses and then in the following 3. 

    ATS:  Generally speaking, in my experience it seems to have been three courses per semester, but then I, too, am in a very challenging academic field.  Perhaps things are different in the B-school; they have to give the students there a heavy course load to keep them out of trouble.   We classicists have enough to do that we don’t have to be given busy work to keep us out of the gin mills and such...or at least that was the case when I was in school.  Things may be different in the Poplicola generation.   Certainly the vocabulary and behavior of some classicists, even those decades the senior of this young man, has become unrecognizable as such to the generation of my professors, who would never have dreamt that anyone in this field would speak like a drunken sailor and/or behave in a similar fashion.  Sadly, even in my field, things have gone downhill.


I too am baffled by the idea of teaching 6 to 8 courses at a time.  How can a single person teach that much/often and still work someplace else.  I suppose if some of those were taught on-line you could teach that many. 

    ATS:  Not if they were foreign language classes, just to speak from my experience.  My Grammatica classes have weekly homework, which yours truly has to correct.  I don’t have the option of walking into class and having the students write sentences on the board for my instant correction in class; I have to correct every single sentence on every paper and return them to the students by e-mail, and those corrections are not confined to pluses and check marks; every error is noted and explained.  The Sermo classes have homework which is a bit less frequent, and not individually corrected, though corrections are provided to the class.  In both cases, especially the latter, it is like pulling teeth to get the students to do the work.  Some won’t even listen to the sound files we have prepared for them to allow them to hear the correct pronunciation of Latin.  


Also, I've never considered the faculty at institutions I've been a student "professors" unless they were doctorate possessing tenured faculty; those with masters degrees teaching I've always considered instructors.  Not that I give any more or less respect, it does remain an issue of academic status.

    ATS:  I have taught at an institution of higher learning where one adjunct in the FL dept. had only a baccalaureate.  However, most have at least one masters’, and deserve respect for that.  I would not be so strict with terminology for the higher ranks; whether or not one has tenure, one is a professor, and only those who do not hold the master’s may be termed instructors.  Those with masters’ degrees are lecturers, not instructors...and at least some may know a great deal more than freshly-minted PhDs.  

Valete;

Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus

Valete.  

On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 10:53 PM, Jesse Corradino <woden66@...> wrote:

  

  

Six to eight college classes at a time?  That's laughable...  What are the subjects in these "classes" pray tell?  Yarn Observation?  Pen Collecting?  I'm a doctoral student in mathematics and have attended several schools and have never in my life encountered a single individual that teaches that many different classes; I'm fairly sure that this is impossible unless one teaches courses with the above fatuous topics.

    

  
    
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65932 From: Jennifer Harris Date: 2009-05-24
Subject: Re: Tink's moderation
Salve Iterum Modianus,

You may see it as rabble rousing,and I see it as Sulla being his
usual sometimes overly protective (but in a good way) of me and my
intrests, for we've been good friends for quite a long time.. Our
viewpoints of Sulla and his sometimes over zealousness are opposite
sides of the same denarii....So guess what in the end the matter has
been solved the Praetors respected my request and now I go back
hopefully into obscurity...Meanwhile though you may want to consider
your reactions this one was a bit explosive :-)


Optime Vale,
Aeternia (going back under the radar)

On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 1:14 PM, David Kling <tau.athanasios@...> wrote:
>
>
> Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus R. Corneliae Aeterniae salutem dicit
>
> There is your answer.  The praetores have not known who you are, and Sulla
> knows this.  He was simply trying to cause trouble in his efforts to
> discredit the praetores.
>
> Vale;
>
> Modianus
>
> On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 2:12 PM, Jennifer Harris <cyannerose@...>
> wrote:
>>
>>
>> Salve Modianus,
>>
>> Those words were completely unneccesary as well, Syulla was wondering
>> why I am being moderated considering I have been a member of this
>> organization since '00..... Is it due to the fact that I usually keep
>> a low profile perhaps? It was for clarification purposes only and I
>> again request that this moderation be lifted rectified whatever have
>> you..
>>
>> Gents... Take some midol please :-)
>>
>> Vale,
>> R. Cornelia Aeternia (That "Tink" person)
>>
>
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65933 From: Christer Edling Date: 2009-05-24
Subject: Re: NR Floralia updates
Salve Amice et Pontifex!

I am impressed of your hard work for the Res Pubica and the Religio! Please continue your fine work! Also send my heartfelt greetings to your Nova Roma companions! It was a long time since I met Cordus, so please send him my warmest greetings! To all others, including yourself that I haven't met, please say that I look forward to meet for the first time.

I will include You in my prayers to Palatua! May she protect You all in the name of the old city!

*****

23 maj 2009 kl. 00.10 skrev Cn. Cornelius Lentulus:



Cn. Lentulus leg. pr. pr. Quiritibus sal.


Just a very quick information, that our guests, A. Apollonius Cordus, C. Petronius Dexter, Sex. Lucilius Tutor and Martina arrived well and we've spent a wonderful afternoon together, visiting historical and famous sites of Budapest, and ending with a dinner.

I must say that talking with Codus in person and listening to his deep thoughts about modern Romanitas and how to approach our most important questions was a wonderful experience, and I've also recieved a wonderful gift from him (a Roman denarius from the republican period, with a Cornelius on it!!). I waited 5 years for this day: to meet my friend!

C. Petronius is a wonderfully nice, polite and humourous person, I highly enjoyed our conversations in Latin with him and Cordus, and I found Petronius a very modest person with a huge knowledge and education. It is gift from Gods to spend this time with Flamen Portunalis Petronius.

Sex. Lucilius Tutor and Matina are just sleeping at my home, very tired of the visiting all the city. They were so warm and nice that I wish to call them my brother and sister. They make me know what the best and most important part of Nova Roma is: friendship without boundaries.

Now, I return to write the coreography texts to the performances, and I prepare to the real Nova Roman ceremony for honouring the 2000th year of Roman presence in Pannonia, and for praying for the future of Nova Roma.

This will be my first public sacrifice as a pontifex, so I will consider it as some kind of ritual investiture to the office. (Your payers are welcome!)

My Roman greetings from Aquincum, in the name Livia, Cordus, Petronius, Tutor and Martina, as well as other Pannonians, Porcius, Vestricius, Lucretia, Popillia, Arrius and everyone! Together with our allied organizations, Nova Roma will be present with at leat 30 people!!











*****************
Vale

Caeso Fabius Buteo Quintilianus

Princeps Senatus et Flamen Palatualis
Civis Romanus sum
************************************************
Aut inveniam viam aut faciam
"I'll either find a way or make one"
************************************************
Dignitas, Iustitia, Fidelitas et Pietas
Dignity, Justice, Loyalty and Dutifulness
************************************************
Mons Palatinus, Clivus Victoriae 
Palatine Hill, Incline of Victoriae 





Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65934 From: Christer Edling Date: 2009-05-24
Subject: Some are trying to set up a one candidate race
Salvete Quirites!

There are arguments for and against the legality of Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus running for Censor. Both sides think that their arguments are complete and correct. 

But one side has a hidden agenda that has been brought up a few times, but always has been drowned in arguments. Their purpose with arguing that Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus can't stand for the Censura is that they want NO COUNTER-CANDIADATE AGAINST GAIUS EQUITIUS CATO.

I can't come to any other conclusion than that they fear that Cato will not be elected if he doesn't stand without competition. How can I say that? Well, those who oppose Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus now could have taken up this issue before the end date for candidates to announce for the Censura, either by bring it up here on the ML or with the Consuls. They could of course have done so with the Tribunes too. Why didn't they do so?

Honestly not _all_ that question the candidature of Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus has any veiled purposes. Most honest citizens admit that it is possible to interpret the law the way that allows Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus to stand, even though they don't support him. They also admit that it is too late to try to hinder any of the candidates from standing. 

But the core of the small group that has been formed around Sulla just want _one_ candidate. They _don't_ want to give the people a choice at all. Please observe that these are the same people who are obstructing all constructive work in the Res Publica, using foul language and threatening the  Res Publica and Nova Roma Inc. in every way they can. If one issue isn't enough they invent a new one. Cato is one of their spokesmen, do we need such people in such an important position as the Censura? No, we need people who want the Res Publica to thrive, develop and grow. We need people that want the Res Publica to organize public worship of the Gods and set up RL projects. 

Quirites, please don't let this shady group get their way. I say, let us vote for Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus as Censor Suffectus, he will actively support the Religio and work for the Res Publica to thrive, develop and grow! 

*****************
Vale

Caeso Fabius Buteo Quintilianus

Princeps Senatus et Flamen Palatualis
Civis Romanus sum
************************************************
Aut inveniam viam aut faciam
"I'll either find a way or make one"
************************************************
Dignitas, Iustitia, Fidelitas et Pietas
Dignity, Justice, Loyalty and Dutifulness
************************************************
Mons Palatinus, Clivus Victoriae 
Palatine Hill, Incline of Victoriae 





Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65935 From: Timothy or Stephen Gallagher Date: 2009-05-24
Subject: Re: Some are trying to set up a one candidate race NOT
Salvete 
 
"They want NO COUNTER-CANDIDATE AGAINST GAIUS EQUITIUS CATO."
 
"Great Caesar's ghost"!!!
 
It would take the Consuls five minutes to issue a new edict changing the time of the elections and open the call for candidates again. They could have it open for 48 to 96 hours. Then hold the election in accordance with the time requirements of the law.
 
This is not rocket science, but if were the Marine could help : )
 
Valete
 
Paulinus

 

To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
From: christer.edling@...
Date: Sun, 24 May 2009 11:31:02 +0200
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Some are trying to set up a one candidate race



Salvete Quirites!

There are arguments for and against the legality of Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus running for Censor. Both sides think that their arguments are complete and correct. 

But one side has a hidden agenda that has been brought up a few times, but always has been drowned in arguments. Their purpose with arguing that Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus can't stand for the Censura is that they want NO COUNTER-CANDIADATE AGAINST GAIUS EQUITIUS CATO.

I can't come to any other conclusion than that they fear that Cato will not be elected if he doesn't stand without competition. How can I say that? Well, those who oppose Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus now could have taken up this issue before the end date for candidates to announce for the Censura, either by bring it up here on the ML or with the Consuls. They could of course have done so with the Tribunes too. Why didn't they do so?

Honestly not _all_ that question the candidature of Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus has any veiled purposes. Most honest citizens admit that it is possible to interpret the law the way that allows Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus to stand, even though they don't support him. They also admit that it is too late to try to hinder any of the candidates from standing. 

But the core of the small group that has been formed around Sulla just want _one_ candidate. They _don't_ want to give the people a choice at all. Please observe that these are the same people who are obstructing all constructive work in the Res Publica, using foul language and threatening the  Res Publica and Nova Roma Inc. in every way they can. If one issue isn't enough they invent a new one. Cato is one of their spokesmen, do we need such people in such an important position as the Censura? No, we need people who want the Res Publica to thrive, develop and grow. We need people that want the Res Publica to organize public worship of the Gods and set up RL projects. 

Quirites, please don't let this shady group get their way. I say, let us vote for Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus as Censor Suffectus, he will actively support the Religio and work for the Res Publica to thrive, develop and grow! 

************ *****
Vale

Caeso Fabius Buteo Quintilianus

Princeps Senatus et Flamen Palatualis
Civis Romanus sum
************ ********* ********* ********* *********
Aut inveniam viam aut faciam
"I'll either find a way or make one"
************ ********* ********* ********* *********
Dignitas, Iustitia, Fidelitas et Pietas
Dignity, Justice, Loyalty and Dutifulness
************ ********* ********* ********* *********
Mons Palatinus, Clivus Victoriae 
Palatine Hill, Incline of Victoriae 






Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65936 From: marcushoratius Date: 2009-05-24
Subject: a. d. IX Kalendas Iunias: Q. R. C. F.
M. Moravius Piscinus Horatianus Quiritibus cultoribus Deorum et omnibus salutem plurimam dicit: Di vos salvas et servatas volunt. .

Hodie est ante diem IX Kalendas Iunonias; haec dies comitialis est: Q. R. C. F; supplicatio Vestae; feriae ex senatus consulto quod eo die Caesar triumphans in urbem invictus est.

Quando Rex Comitiavit Fas: "When it is proper and right for the Rex (Sacrorum) to convoke the Comitia (Curiata)."

This was the day, as in March, when the Rex, and later the Rex Sacrorum, was permitted to call the comitia curiata that it might hear the proclamation of wills and certain types of adoptions. While we might think of this as an exception to the Republican prosciption on the Rex Sacrorum from holding any political office, the one remaining role of the comitia curiata had a religious significance. Roman wills, and often times adoptions as well, were more concerned with the transfer of the family cultus and its shrines than with the transference of property. Today is about maintaining the ius Manibus and the family culti to the Lares. Although today is dies comitialis, no other comitia may assemble until the Rex Sacrorum dismisses the Curiata from the Comitia Calata. A suplicatio for Vesta is also noted for today.

"Vesta, favor me. To You now our voices lift in praise as by this rite it is allowed that we may approach You." ~ P. Ovid Naso, Fasti 6.249-50


AUC 541 / 212 BCE: Superstition engulfs the City as the war with Hannibal drags on

"The longer the war continued, and the more men's minds as well as their fortunes were affected by the alternations of success and failure, so much the more did the citizens become the victims of superstitions, and those for the most part foreign ones. It seemed as though either the characters of men or the nature of the Gods had undergone a sudden change. The Roman ritual was growing into disuse not only in secret and in private houses; even in public places, in the Forum and the Capitol, crowds of women were to be seen who were offering neither sacrifices nor prayers in accordance with ancient usage. Unauthorised sacrificers and diviners had got possession of men's minds and the numbers of their dupes were swelled by the crowds of country people whom poverty or fear had driven into the City, and whose fields had lain untilled owing to the length of the war or had been desolated by the enemy. These impostors found their profit in trading upon the ignorance of others, and they practiced their calling with as much effrontery as if they had been duly authorised by the State. Respectable citizens protested in private against the state of things, and ultimately the matter became a public scandal and formal complaint was made to the senate. The aediles and commissioners of police were severely reprimanded by the senate for not preventing these abuses, but when they attempted to remove the crowds from the Forum and destroy the altars and other preparations for their rites they narrowly escaped being roughly handled. As the mischief appeared to be too much for the inferior magistrates to deal with, M. Aemilius, the praetor urbanus, was entrusted with the task of delivering the people from these superstitions. He read the resolution of the senate before the Assembly and gave notice that all those who had in their possession any manuals of divination or forms of prayers or sacrificial ritual in writing were to bring all their books and writings to him before the first of April, and no one was to use any strange or foreign form of sacrifice in any public or consecrated place." ~ Titus Livius 25.1.6 ff


AUC 738 / 15 BCE: Birth of Germanicus Caesar.

The popular heir apparent and grandson of Augustus, Germanicus died under what was regarded as suspicious circumstances. He was later recognized as a divus, and thus appears on the military calendar of Dura Europus (227 CE). A supplication is noted as held in his memory.


AUC 719 / 34 BCE: Anthony as Pater Liber

"Then as his love for Cleopatra became more ardent and his vices grew upon him — for these are always nourished by power and license and flattery — he resolved to make war upon his country. He had previously given orders that he should be called the new Father Liber, and indeed in a procession at Alexandria he had impersonated Father Liber, his head bound with the ivy wreath, his person enveloped in the saffron robe of gold, holding in his hand the thyrsus, wearing the buskins, and riding in the Bacchic chariot." ~ Velleius Paterculus, Historia 82.4

"Why do they call Bacchus Pater Liber? Is it because He is the Father of Freedom to drinkers? For most people become bold snd are abounding in frank speech when they are in their cups. Or is it because He has provided the means for libations? Or is it derived, as Alexander asserts, from Dionysus Eleutherens, so named from Eleutherae in Boeotia?" ~ Plutarch, Roman Questions 104


Our thought for today is from Democritus, Golden Sentences 16.

"He who is perfectly vanquished by riches, can never be just."
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65937 From: David Kling Date: 2009-05-24
Subject: Re: Open Letter to the Praetors: Possible Solution for Election Mess
He has been around since 2003 or 2004. 

Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus

On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 9:08 PM, Q. Valerius Poplicola <q.valerius.poplicola@...> wrote:


So, so sad this didn't get off the ground. Stick around, Constantius, you're a breath of fresh air needed around here.




Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65938 From: deciusiunius Date: 2009-05-24
Subject: Re: Consecutive Terms
--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Terry Boyle" <twboyle@...> wrote:
>
> Salve Palladius

Salve Iuni Dominice,

> This clearly is not your fault. When you write a law you do >with all good intentions. The law does not truly get tested until >something like this particular situation

You're right, I guess I shouldn't worry too much about it, it is 10 years old after all and held up during all that time.

Maybe I've just been looking for a place to use that phrase from the old Catholic Mass. :-) It has its own poetry. The RC Church lost a lot when they moved to the vernacular.


Vale,


Palladius




> Salve Po, glad to see you back (I say on the verge of an extended absence but I'll be back)
>
> After reading your comments, Iunia Laeca's and others, and mulling them over for sometime, I have to agree the law can reasonably be read the way you read it. There is no reference to term, only the person holding the office.
>
> Having written the law I know it was *meant* to prevent just such a situation as Modianus is in, but we must take the law as it is written, not as the author knows it was supposed to do, and I failed to anticipate all situations and write them in there specifically. Mea culpa, mea culpa, mea maxima culpa. The law as read allows Modinaus to run. Whether he should is a different question, but the law allows it.
>
> Vale bene,
>
> Palladius
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "pompeia_minucia_tiberia" <scriba_forum@> wrote:
> >
> > Pompeia Quiritibus S.P.D.
> >
> > Now, I haven't been a very attentive citizen lately due to other commitments (I see I even missed the deadline for taxes) so I don't have much voting power in this either way, but I'll give my honest opinion, which I'm sure will meet with disagreement (I'm used to this), but anyway:
> >
> > The law reads:
> >
> >
> > 1. No person shall hold the office of censor *consecutively* OR *more than twice* in a *five-year* period.
> >
> > My humble take:
> >
> > The law doesn't mandate a specific interval of time between occasions an individual may hold the office of Censor, it just says 'consecutively'. Was Modianus his own predecessor? No, I'm afraid it was Laenus. So, it cannot be said that Modianus is running 'consecutively', consecutively, meaning 'back to back', 'without interruption'.
> >
> > The law doesn't say " a period of no less than 12 consecutive months must separate the two terms a Censor may hold office in a five year period" (or other synonymous language) it just says 'consecutively'.
> > Since Modianus had a predecessor other than himself, and in the absence of any other defining language in the lex, I must default to the meaning of the word 'consecutive' and say that he is not running 'consecutively'
> >
> >
> > The law continues (with respect to Censors):
> >
> >
> > "This exception to this provision shall be any censor suffectus who has served 6 months or less of his predecessor's term of office."
> >
> >
> > Now, given that Modianus would be serving *more* than six months as a suffectus, it stands that this term, if he's elected, will count toward that second term in five years.
> >
> > And please take note that this quoted clause above, acknowledges a resigned or partial term censor (Laenus) as a "predecessor" to the "suffectus" (Modianus); so it's even harder for me to label Modianus' terms as "consecutive". Twice in five years, yes, but not 'consecutive'. How can one run consecutively with a predecessor?
> >
> > I'm afraid I don't see a 'cut and dry' opposition to the law on the part of the Consuls here, sorry. I don't like to see people jerked around, and I've been very vocal about saying so, especially last year, but I honestly don't see where Modianus should be disqualified from running on the basis of this law.
> >
> > And, although I haven't read through all the posts, I am assuming that this issue was raised to the Tribunes a little bit sooner than the last few days or so?
> >
> > Valete
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65939 From: David Kling Date: 2009-05-24
Subject: Re: Some are trying to set up a one candidate race
Salve;

Thank you for your support and kind words on my candidacy.  Your support means a great deal to me and I am thankful.

Vale;

Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus

On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 5:31 AM, Christer Edling <christer.edling@...> wrote:


Salvete Quirites!

There are arguments for and against the legality of Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus running for Censor. Both sides think that their arguments are complete and correct. 

But one side has a hidden agenda that has been brought up a few times, but always has been drowned in arguments. Their purpose with arguing that Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus can't stand for the Censura is that they want NO COUNTER-CANDIADATE AGAINST GAIUS EQUITIUS CATO.

I can't come to any other conclusion than that they fear that Cato will not be elected if he doesn't stand without competition. How can I say that? Well, those who oppose Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus now could have taken up this issue before the end date for candidates to announce for the Censura, either by bring it up here on the ML or with the Consuls. They could of course have done so with the Tribunes too. Why didn't they do so?

Honestly not _all_ that question the candidature of Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus has any veiled purposes. Most honest citizens admit that it is possible to interpret the law the way that allows Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus to stand, even though they don't support him. They also admit that it is too late to try to hinder any of the candidates from standing. 

But the core of the small group that has been formed around Sulla just want _one_ candidate. They _don't_ want to give the people a choice at all. Please observe that these are the same people who are obstructing all constructive work in the Res Publica, using foul language and threatening the  Res Publica and Nova Roma Inc. in every way they can. If one issue isn't enough they invent a new one. Cato is one of their spokesmen, do we need such people in such an important position as the Censura? No, we need people who want the Res Publica to thrive, develop and grow. We need people that want the Res Publica to organize public worship of the Gods and set up RL projects. 

Quirites, please don't let this shady group get their way. I say, let us vote for Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus as Censor Suffectus, he will actively support the Religio and work for the Res Publica to thrive, develop and grow! 

*****************
Vale

Caeso Fabius Buteo Quintilianus

Princeps Senatus et Flamen Palatualis
Civis Romanus sum

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65940 From: David Kling Date: 2009-05-24
Subject: Re: Some are trying to set up a one candidate race NOT
Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus Tiberio Galerio Paulino salutem dicit

I am running for censor.  You need to get used to that fact.

Also, if things were so easy with calling the comitia.  If the edict is changed then a new augury would need taken under the new comitia call.

Vale;

Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus

On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 6:04 AM, Timothy or Stephen Gallagher <spqr753@...> wrote:


Salvete 
 
"They want NO COUNTER-CANDIDATE AGAINST GAIUS EQUITIUS CATO."
 
"Great Caesar's ghost"!!!
 
It would take the Consuls five minutes to issue a new edict changing the time of the elections and open the call for candidates again. They could have it open for 48 to 96 hours. Then hold the election in accordance with the time requirements of the law.
 
This is not rocket science, but if were the Marine could help : )
 
Valete
 
Paulinus




Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65941 From: David Kling Date: 2009-05-24
Subject: Re: Consecutive Terms
Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus Decio Iunio Palladio Invicto salutem dicit

There is an interesting website:  http://www.newliturgicalmovement.org/

Thought you might be interested in it since you seem interested in the Tridentine Liturgy -- which is making a come-back in the Roman Church.

Vale;

Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus

On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 10:28 AM, deciusiunius <bcatfd@...> wrote:


--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Terry Boyle" <twboyle@...> wrote:
>
> Salve Palladius

Salve Iuni Dominice,


> This clearly is not your fault. When you write a law you do >with all good intentions. The law does not truly get tested until >something like this particular situation

You're right, I guess I shouldn't worry too much about it, it is 10 years old after all and held up during all that time.

Maybe I've just been looking for a place to use that phrase from the old Catholic Mass. :-) It has its own poetry. The RC Church lost a lot when they moved to the vernacular.

Vale,

Palladius



Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65942 From: L Julia Aquila Date: 2009-05-24
Subject: Re: R. Cornelia Aeternia aka Tink's moderation
L. Iulia Aquila R. Corneliae Aeterniae S.P.D.

You are very welcome.
And off moderation;)

Vale,
L. Iulia Aquila
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65943 From: Publius Ullerius Stephanus Venator Date: 2009-05-24
Subject: Latin Mass to Vernacular, was Re: Consecutive Terms
Ave Palladius;

On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 9:28 AM, deciusiunius wrote:
>
> [excision]
>
> Maybe I've just been looking for a place to use that phrase from the old
> Catholic Mass. :-) It has its own poetry. The RC Church lost a lot when they
> moved to the vernacular.
>
> Vale,
>
> Palladius
>

This I agree with completely. The Latin Mass has a certain majesty
and mystery, which is wholly lacking in Modern English (being why I
use many Old Norse and Anglo-Saxon terms in my poetry ;-)

I don't believe that retention of the Latin Mass would have kept me a
faithful son of the Church, though =)

=====================================
In amicitia et fide
Publius Ullerius Stephanus Venator
Civis circa Quintilis MMDCCLI a.u.c.
Religio Septentrionalis - Poeta

(all sites subject to sporadic updates)
http://www.myspace.com/venator_poetus
http://anheathenreader.blogspot.com/
http://www.catamount-grange-hearth.org/
http://www.cafepress.com/catamountgrange
--
May the Holy Powers smile on our efforts.
May the Spirits of our family lines nod in approval.
May we be of Worth to our fellow Nova Romans.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65944 From: David Kling Date: 2009-05-24
Subject: Re: Latin Mass to Vernacular, was Re: Consecutive Terms
Salvete:

The Tridentine Mass, aka Latin Mass, was/is a beautiful rite.  The Novus Ordo Missae was a complete re-write of the liturgy and took away much of the solemnity of the mass.  If they would have simply translated the Tridentine mass into English that would have been one thing, but the total change of the liturgy radically changed the feel and charism of the mass.  Essentially was made Protestant.  If you compare the Novus Order with Lutheran "Lord's Supper" there is a stricking similarity.  This is unfortunate both theologically and towards Catholic identity.

Valete;

Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus

On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 11:17 AM, Publius Ullerius Stephanus Venator <famila.ulleria.venii@...> wrote:


Ave Palladius;

On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 9:28 AM, deciusiunius wrote:
>
> [excision]
>
> Maybe I've just been looking for a place to use that phrase from the old
> Catholic Mass. :-) It has its own poetry. The RC Church lost a lot when they
> moved to the vernacular.
>
> Vale,
>
> Palladius
>

This I agree with completely. The Latin Mass has a certain majesty
and mystery, which is wholly lacking in Modern English (being why I
use many Old Norse and Anglo-Saxon terms in my poetry ;-)

I don't believe that retention of the Latin Mass would have kept me a
faithful son of the Church, though =)




Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65945 From: Christer Edling Date: 2009-05-24
Subject: Re: Some are trying to set up a one candidate race NOT
Salve Censor!

24 maj 2009 kl. 12.04 skrev Timothy or Stephen Gallagher:

Salvete 
 
"They want NO COUNTER-CANDIDATE AGAINST GAIUS EQUITIUS CATO."
 
"Great Caesar's ghost"!!!
 
It would take the Consuls five minutes to issue a new edict changing the time of the elections and open the call for candidates again. 

CFBQ: Why should they, they have already determined that the partipation of both candidates in the election is legal.

They could have it open for 48 to 96 hours. Then hold the election in accordance with the time requirements of the law.
 
CFBQ: I was not discussing technicalities, but the bad impression some citizen give when they with any possible arguments ty to get the election to become a one candidate race. The rules are already set and to try to convince one and all that we should only have one candidate is quite schocking.

This is not rocket science, but if were the Marine could help : )

CFBQ: I am a Swede and I know very little about the US Marine Corps, but I didn't think they were involved in rocket _science_, except perhaps Censorius Gnaeus Equitius Marinus. ;-)
 
Valete
 
Paulinus



*****************
Vale

Caeso Fabius Buteo Quintilianus

Princeps Senatus et Flamen Palatualis
Civis Romanus sum
************************************************
Aut inveniam viam aut faciam
"I'll either find a way or make one"
************************************************
Dignitas, Iustitia, Fidelitas et Pietas
Dignity, Justice, Loyalty and Dutifulness
************************************************
Mons Palatinus, Clivus Victoriae 
Palatine Hill, Incline of Victoriae 





Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65946 From: L Julia Aquila Date: 2009-05-24
Subject: Re: Candidacy!
L. Iulia Aquila A. Tulliae Scholasticae S.P.D.

Thank you for your reply; they are always welcome, as are your Latin corrections because they only serve to make my own feeble use of Latin stronger ;)

Perhaps in person DIP may have been tall and dignified when you met him; however I have come to find people sometimes behave differently on the ML. His very words speak for themselves and it is typical for those he associates with to disparage one's demeanor when they disagree with them, for example insinuating that it was "worse" if I display an instance of humor when it was he who demonstrated behavior that was not dignified, and in my mind inappropriate, particularly his first post to me. It was I who was very taken aback by his tone and his insinuations and see I would only be in for more of the same if I reply any further. There is no reason to continue with a conversation with him as my original query has been satisfied.

>ATS: He does not impress me as a bully, though some of his political pals on the BA might >bear that label more deservedly.

There is an old axiom: "He who lies down with dogs, will rise with fleas."

>ATS: While I don't recall who said what here, it is unfortunately true that there are >cases where one is punished for speaking one's mind, even when insubordination and >the like are not involved.

That comment speaks for itself.

Bene vale amica,

L. Julia Aquila
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65947 From: Publius Ullerius Stephanus Venator Date: 2009-05-24
Subject: Re: Latin Mass to Vernacular, was Re: Consecutive Terms
Ave Modianus;

Another thing the modernization of the Mass (and Church) gave my home
parish was a "renovation" of the sanctuary due to the greater say the
laity had in running the parish.

We had a beautiful Carerra marble High Altar with complementary side
altars (one to Saint Anne, patroness of our parish and one to the Holy
Family) at the northern end of the church. Lovely, traditional
Stations of the Cross around the periphery, murals on the ceiling,
marble Baptismal font and so forth.

The barbarian modernists convinced the folk of the parish that a more
modern, "pop-culture" altar with a wooden, wall-mounted statue of
Jesus mounted on a new wall, which covered the stained glass windows
in the center third of the western wall would be better.

A lot of the younger people of my peer group began questioning; if the
"one, true Holy Mother Church" had to change so much, was it worth
staying?

Only things of the "old-fashioned church" left were the ceiling,
stained glass windows the frontspiece of the original altar, mounted
on the "crying room" they built where the high altar used to stand.

Now, about 35 years later, my home parish is gone. 4 generations of
my family were baptized, married and laid to rest there. RIP Saint
Anne's Church, W Springfield, MA.

Vale - Venator
(who does have a sentimental view of his upbringing and respect for
his forebears)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65948 From: Drusilla Date: 2009-05-24
Subject: MY SUPPORT FOR K. FABIUS BUTEO MODIANUS
Salvete
 
I was undecided who to vote in this election to the censorship.
 
The arguments about the validity of the candidacies seem futile and just election propaganda.

What I really decided to choose one candidate is the impression that one candidate is a fan (I do not know that) and the other looks like a reasonable person,
one of the candidates said to be in possession of the truth,  the other dialogue.
 
I have decided to vote K. Fabius Buteo Modianus because I'm tired of reading messages from Equitius Cato saying: I am right, the truth is mine, everything is done in Nova Roma is illegal, I am going to complain you.  (I'm also tired of reading messages from Cornelius Sulla and others with the same arguments)
 
Please citizens, vote to K. Fabius Buteo Modianus for Censor. He has proven to be the best choice for this office.
 
Valete
 
Quinta Fabia Drusilla
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65949 From: Timothy or Stephen Gallagher Date: 2009-05-24
Subject: FW: [Explorator] explorator 12.05
Salvete 
 
FYI
 
Vale
 
Paulinus
 

To: explorator@yahoogroups.com; BRITARCH@...
From: rogueclassicist@...
Date: Sun, 24 May 2009 10:33:44 -0400
Subject: [Explorator] explorator 12.05



============ ========= ========= ========= ========= ========= =======
explorator 12.05 May 24, 2009
============ ========= ========= ========= ========= ========= =======
Editor's note: Most urls should be active for at least eight
hours from the time of publication.

For your computer's protection, Explorator is sent in plain text
and NEVER has attachments. Be suspicious of any Explorator which
arrives otherwise!!!
============ ========= ========= ========= ========= ========= =======
============ ========= ========= ========= ========= ========= =======
Thanks to Arthur Shippee, Dave Sowdon, Adrienne Mayor, "Duke Jason",
Hernan Astudillo, John McMahon, Joseph Lauer, Mata Kimasitayo,
Kurt Theis, Mike Ruggeri, Richard C. Griffiths, Bob Heuman,
Richard Campbell, Towse Harrison, Mike Bishop, and Ross W. Sargent
for headses upses this week (as always hoping I have left no one out).

n.b. Thunderbird did one of its patented 'losing profile' things
this week, and despite the claims, a good chunk of my email did
vanish from my hard drive; I've recovered as much as I could from
my online account, but I may have missed some items; I also suspect
I went back a bit too far and have a few duplicates from last week ...
apologies if this sort of thing bothers you ...

============ ========= ========= ========= ========= ========= =======
EARLY HUMANS
============ ========= ========= ========= ========= ========= =======
I think we mentioned this 'missing link' (now dubbed 'Ida') in
passing last week ... a veritable flood this week:

http://www.nytimes. com/2009/ 05/16/science/ 16fossil. html
http://www.timesonl ine.co.uk/ tol/news/ uk/science/ article6320891. ece (video)
http://www.nbcchica go.com/news/ us_world/ Fossil-Discovery -Hailed-as- Link-Between- Monkey-and- Man.html
http://www.cnn. com/2009/ TECH/science/ 05/19/human. ancestor/ index.html? section=cnn_ latest
http://www.guardian .co.uk/science/ 2009/may/ 19/ida-fossil- missing-link
http://online. wsj.com/article/ SB12423563293612 2739.html
http://news. bbc.co.uk/ 2/low/science/ nature/8057465. stm
http://www.scienced aily.com/ releases/ 2009/05/09051910 4643.htm

Early hominids were primarily right-handed, apparently:

http://www.newscien tist.com/ article/dn17184- teeth-hint- that-righthanded ness-is-an- ancient-trait. html

The Laetoli footprints are going to get a 'facelift':

http://allafrica. com/stories/ 200905181099. html

More coverage of the humans-chowing- down-on-Neandert hals claim:

http://www.nbcphila delphia.com/ news/us_world/ Humans-Ate- Nanderthals. html
http://www.guardian .co.uk/science/ 2009/may/ 17/neanderthals- cannibalism- anthropological- sciences- journal

============ ========= ========= ========= ========= ========= =======
AFRICA
============ ========= ========= ========= ========= ========= =======
More on the ancient 'superglue' found in a Kwazulu-Natal cave:

http://www.iol. co.za/widgets/ rss_redirect. php?artid= vn20090521055312 218C651677& setid=1&sectid= 79&url=iol& vne=0&csect= News

============ ========= ========= ========= ========= ========= =======
ANCIENT NEAR EAST AND EGYPT
============ ========= ========= ========= ========= ========= =======
Not sure if we've had this traces-of-herbs- in-Egyptian- wine
story yet:

http://www.ldnews. com/ci_12133696? source=most_ emailed

Recent finds from Egypt:

http://weekly. ahram.org. eg/2009/948/ he2.htm

Zahi Hawass explains what he does:

http://weekly. ahram.org. eg/2009/948/ he1.htm

The 'Menachem-handle- inscription' is the latest interesting find
from Jerusalem:

http://www.haaretz. com/hasen/ pages/ShArt. jhtml?itemNo= 1086601
http://www.haaretz. co.il/hasite/ images/daily/ D190509/245stone .jpg (photo)
http://news. yahoo.com/ s/ap/20090520/ ap_on_re_ mi_ea/ml_ israel_ancient_ inscription_ 5
http://www.msnbc. msn.com/id/ 30844981/ ns/technology_ and_science- science/
http://www.huffingt onpost.com/ 2009/05/20/ ancient-hebrew- artifact- f_n_206085. html
http://www.azstarne t.com/sn/ news/293782. php
http://jta.org/ news/article/ 2009/05/20/ 1005303/first- temple-remains- discovered- in-jerusalem
http://www.haaretz. com/hasen/ spages/1086817. html
http://www.israelna tionalnews. com/News/ News.aspx/ 131460
http://www.latimes. com/news/ nationworld/ wire/sns- ap-ml-israel- ancient-inscript ion%2C1%2C404412 9.story
http://www.emol. com/noticias/ internacional/ detalle/detallen oticias.asp? idnoticia= 359044

... and then there's the bone seal with the name 'Shaul' on it
(the first link will expire soon, I suspect):

http://www.antiquit ies.org.il/ about_eng. asp?Modul_ id=14
http://www.mfa. gov.il/MFA/ Israel+beyond+ politics/ First-Temple- period-bone- seal-found- 19-May-2009. htm

Arutz Sheva covers both of the previous very nicely (with photos):

http://www.israelna tionalnews. com/News/ News.aspx/ 131460
cf:
http://www.google. com/hostednews/ ap/article/ ALeqM5iJfa- QD2MQYwlFeOwLk5h ERiUkOAD98A5OT00

Feature on "Israel's Atlantis":

http://www.jpost. com/servlet/ Satellite? cid=124221243554 0&pagename= JPost%2FJPArticl e%2FShowFull

A dig in Israel is endangering daffodils (?!?):

http://www.haaretz. com/hasen/ spages/1087724. html

Finds from various periods at Umm Al Quwain:

http://www.khaleejt imes.com/ DisplayArticle08 .asp?xfile= /data/theuae/ 2009/May/ theuae_May428. xml&section= theuae

We're hearing of another plan to send a robot into the Great Pyramid:

http://www.sis. gov.eg/En/ EgyptOnline/ Culture/000002/ 0203000000000000 001151.htm

Some interesting Egypt-related youtube items (check sidebar as well):

http://www.youtube. com/watch? v=Izh8cc8VkP0& eurl=http% 3A%2F%2Fwww. bloglines. com%2Fmyblogs_ display%3Ffolder %3D190209& feature=player_ embedded

More on Nefertiti:

http://www.spiegel. de/international /zeitgeist/ 0,1518,625719, 00.html

Egyptology News Blog:

http://egyptology. blogspot. com/

Egyptology Blog:

http://www.egyptolo gyblog.co. uk/

Dr Leen Ritmeyer's Blog:

http://blog. ritmeyer. com/

Paleojudaica:

http://paleojudaica .blogspot. com/

Persepolis Fortification Archives:

http://persepolista blets.blogspot. com/

Archaeologist at Large:

http://spaces. msn.com/members/ ArchaeologyinEgy pt/
============ ========= ========= ========= ========= ========= =======
ANCIENT GREECE AND ROME (AND CLASSICS)
============ ========= ========= ========= ========= ========= =======
Interesting account of the find of some letters written by
a schoolboy who discovered a Roman villa in Lawrence Weston
in 1947:

http://www.thisisbr istol.co. uk/homepage/ Roman-villa- finder-s- thoughts- revealed/ article-999252- detail/article. html

A Hellenistic statue (which probably isn't Alexander) from Alexandria:

http://www.ana- mpa.gr/anaweb/ user/showplain? maindoc=7597593& service=142

Rome has opened up a pile of underground sites (including the
Ludus Magnus) to the public:

http://www.timesonl ine.co.uk/ tol/news/ world/europe/ article6345753. ece
http://www.stuff. co.nz/travel/ international/ 2432346/Undergro und-Rome- sites-open- to-visitors

Latin is returning to state schools in the UK:

http://www.guardian .co.uk/education /2009/may/ 22/latin- funding-state- schools

Vague press release on finds from an unmentioned period at Berenike:

http://en.naukawpol sce.pl/palio/ html.run? _Instance= cms_naukapl. pap.pl&_PageID= 1&s=szablon. depesza&dz= archeology& dep=361511& data=&lang= EN&_CheckSum= 2050323395

Interesting project to 'digitally' unroll scrolls from Herculaneum:

http://www.tmcnet. com/usubmit/ 2009/05/19/ 4186088.htm

A project to save ancient temples on Malta:

http://news. bbc.co.uk/ 2/hi/europe/ 8054873.stm

They'll be digging at Peperikon again:

http://www.focus- fen.net/index. php?id=n181507

An online atlas of the Saxon Shore:

http://inlitoresaxo nico.org. uk/

An online atlas of Hadrian's Wall:

http://perlineamval li.org.uk/

Nice profile of Ruth Padel:

http://www.guardian .co.uk/books/ 2009/may/ 17/ruth-padel- profile
cf: http://www.nytimes. com/2009/ 05/18/books/ 18arts-301YEARME NON_BRF.html

... and one on John Hale:

http://www.courier- journal.com/ article/20090517 /FEATURES/ 905170301/ 1010/rss04

More coverage of the 'dig' at Pavlopetri:

http://www.nature. com/news/ 2009/090518/ full/news. 2009.484. html

More coverage of that reconstructed millefiore/i bowl:

http://www.guardian .co.uk/artanddes ign/2009/ apr/30/glass- bowl-roman- london-grave- heritage
http://www.sundayob server.lk/ 2009/05/17/ jun02.asp

Review of Barry Strauss, *The Spartacus War*:

http://www.news. cornell.edu/ stories/May09/ Spartacus. da.html

Recent reviews from BMCR:

http://ccat. sas.upenn. edu/bmcr/ recent.html

Recent reviews from Scholia:

http://www.classics .ukzn.ac. za/reviews/ 2009.htm

Visit our blog:

http://rogueclassic ism.com/

Mediterranean Archaeology:

http://medarch. blogspot. com/
============ ========= ========= ========= ========= ========= =======
EUROPE AND THE UK (+ Ireland)
============ ========= ========= ========= ========= ========= =======
West Dorset's oldest human settlement:

http://news. bbc.co.uk/ 2/hi/uk_news/ england/dorset/ 8062513.stm

They've been repairing Cadiz' walls pretty much the same way for
300 years:

http://www.scienced aily.com/ releases/ 2009/05/09051109 1534.htm

A gardener in Herefordshire keeps finding interesting things:

http://www.iol. co.za/index. php?from= rss_A%20Step% 20Beyond& set_id=1& click_id= 29&art_id= vn20090522054429 856C685385

A medieval necropolis from Novgorod:

http://www.russia- ic.com/news/ show/8246/

Interesting hype for a television program about the HMS Victory:

http://news. bbc.co.uk/ 2/hi/programmes/ newsnight/ 8058449.stm
http://www.timesonl ine.co.uk/ tol/news/ environment/ article6322407. ece

A survey in West Kent prior to pipeline construction:

http://news. bbc.co.uk/ 2/hi/uk_news/ england/kent/ 8065206.stm

Nice APOD photo of moon rays over Thurso Castle:

http://antwrp. gsfc.nasa. gov/apod/ ap090518. html

Archaeology in Europe Blog:

http://www.archaeol ogy.eu.com/ weblog/index. html
============ ========= ========= ========= ========= ========= =======
ASIA AND THE SOUTH PACIFIC
============ ========= ========= ========= ========= ========= =======
Finds from various periods from China's Hunan province:

http://news. xinhuanet. com/english/ 2009-05/15/ content_11378574 .htm

A 2000 b.p. megalith from Tam Dao:

http://english. vietnamnet. vn/tech/2009/ 05/848883/

Footprints from 2000 years ago are shedding light on some ancient
war scene:

http://www.china. org.cn/culture/ 2009-05/22/ content_17819389 .htm

A European skull found in a New Zealand riverbed may have come
from a Dutch shipwreck victim:

http://www.stuff. co.nz/science/ 2424675/Skull- riddle-may- be-solved

The mystery of the inscription on the Calatagan Pot:

http://newsinfo. inquirer. net/inquirerhead lines/regions/ view/20090523- 206657/The- mystery-of- the-ancient- inscription

Did 'fish poisoning' lead to the colonization of New Zealand etc.?:

http://www.scienced aily.com/ releases/ 2009/05/09051811 1717.htm

Conference on the 'Bamboo Annals':

http://news. stanford. edu/news/ 2009/may20/ china-052009. html

Southeast Asian Archaeology Newsblog:

http://www.southeas tasianarchaeolog y.com/

New Zealand Archaeology eNews:

http://www.nzarchae ology.org/ netsubnews. htm
============ ========= ========= ========= ========= ========= =======
NORTH AMERICA
============ ========= ========= ========= ========= ========= =======
Feature on a vaguely-identified site in Granite Falls (?):

http://www.granitef allsnews. com/articles/ 2009/05/17/ news/news02. txt

Global warming apparently did not wipe out the Pueblo/Anasazi civilization:

http://www.newkeral a.com/nkfullnews -1-42443. html
http://media- newswire. com/release_ 1091672.html

Finds from various periods at a condo construction site in Orillia:

http://www.timminsp ress.com/ ArticleDisplay. aspx?e=1577340

An interesting item on a Union soldier who was actually a woman:

http://www.npr. org/templates/ story/story. php?storyId= 104452266

... and the "Plantation that Moved Away":

http://www.npr. org/templates/ story/story. php?storyId= 104494296

The search is on for some Civil War cannons in SC:

http://www.goupstat e.com/article/ 20090521/ ARTICLES/ 905219966/ 1083/ARTICLES? Title=SC- state-archaeolog ist-looks- for-Civil- War-cannons-

They've wrapped up the dig at the Magruder House (Va):

http://www.gazette. net/stories/ 05212009/ hyatnew171957_ 32523.shtml

Trying to confirm a skull's link to the 1857 massacre in Utah:

http://www.idahopre ss.com/?id= 23435

On learning from revisiting old digs:

http://www.dispatch .com/live/ content/science/ stories/2009/ 05/17/digs. html

Hype for a return-to-digging at a Rhode Island slave trader's home:

http://www.google. com/hostednews/ canadianpress/ article/ALeqM5io D9pwp0v2cZqx9gxj gU32tTFJ4Q

Feature on John Dewberry's house (Charleston, S.C.):

http://www.nytimes. com/2009/ 05/22/greathomes anddestinations/ 22Away.html

Review of Eric W. Sanderson, *Mannahatta* :

http://www.nytimes. com/2009/ 05/24/books/ review/Sullivan- t.html

Review of Gail Fenske,*The Skyscraper and the City*:

http://www.nytimes. com/2009/ 05/17/realestate /17scapes. html

More on Navajo smoke signals:

http://www.redorbit .com/news/ science/1690171/ ancient_navajo_ smoke_signals_ getting_a_ second_look/ index.html? source=r_ science
http://news. yahoo.com/ s/ap/20090516/ ap_on_sc/ us_smoke_ signals_3
============ ========= ========= ========= ========= ========= =======
CENTRAL AND SOUTH AMERICA
============ ========= ========= ========= ========= ========= =======
Interesting coverage of some 'gem-studded- teeth' evidence from
Mexico and environs:

http://news. nationalgeograph ic.com/news/ 2009/05/090518- jeweled-teeth- picture.html
http://www.fijitime s.com/story. aspx?id=122109
http://www.newkeral a.com/nkfullnews -1-41270. html

Evidence of pre-industrial mercury pollution in the Andes:

http://www.physorg. com/news16188587 2.html
http://www.eurekale rt.org/pub_ releases/ 2009-05/uoa- tfe051509. php
http://news. nationalgeograph ic.com/news/ 2009/05/photogal leries/andes- ancient-metalwor king-mercury/ index.html
http://www.scienced aily.com/ releases/ 2009/05/09051817 2644.htm

Not sure if we mentioned this Mayan Creation Myth feature before:

http://discovermaga zine.com/ 2009/jun/ 05-unearthing- the-mayan- creation- myth

Mike Ruggeri's Ancient Americas Breaking News:

http://web.mac. com/michaelrugge ri

Ancient MesoAmerica News:

http://ancient- mesoamerica- news-updates. blogspot. com/
============ ========= ========= ========= ========= ========= =======
OTHER ITEMS OF INTEREST
============ ========= ========= ========= ========= ========= =======
I don't think we mentioned this new dating method last week:

http://news. bbc.co.uk/ 2/hi/uk_news/ scotland/ edinburgh_ and_east/ 8058185.stm
http://rspa. royalsocietypubl ishing.org/ site/misc/ rehydroxylation. xhtml

What ancient structures can teach modern engineers:

http://www.archaeol ogy.org/0905/ etc/conversation .html

What we can learn from ancient medical stuff:

http://www.timesdis patch.com/ rtd/lifestyles/ health_med_ fit/article/ I-DRUG0427_ 20090514- 185634/267755/

... not sure if this is related to the above or not (on medicinal
properties of Jordan's soil):

http://www.scienced aily.com/ releases/ 2009/05/09051822 2202.htm

They've found Louis XVI's pre-execution testament:

http://www.telegrap h.co.uk/news/ worldnews/ europe/france/ 5356698/Louis- XVIs-final- testament- discovered. html

More on the possible origins of the sardonic grin:

http://www.telegrap h.co.uk/sciencea ndtechnology/ science/sciencen ews/5344257/ Mystery-of- the-sardonic- grin-solved. html
http://dsc.discover y.com/news/ 2009/05/20/ sardonic- smile-toxin. html

More on those Thomas Becket paintings from Spain:

http://news. bbc.co.uk/ 1/hi/world/ europe/8029320. stm

Shakespeare' s Sonnets are 400:

http://papercuts. blogs.nytimes. com/2009/ 05/20/the- sonnets-at- 400/

Review of John Caroll, *The Wreck of Western Culture*:

http://www.weeklyst andard.com/ Content/Public/ Articles/ 000/000/016/ 548zvlpc. asp

Oxford Dictionary of National Biography Lives of the Week:

http://www.oxforddn b.com/public/ lotw/

Arts and Letters Daily:

http://aldaily. com/

Past Preservers:

http://pastpreserve rs.blogspot. com/
============ ========= ========= ========= ========= ========= =======
TOURISTY THINGS
============ ========= ========= ========= ========= ========= =======
Israel (with the kids!):

http://travel. nytimes.com/ 2009/05/17/ travel/17kids. html

Patmos:

http://www.nytimes. com/indexes/ 2009/05/17/ style/t/index. html

Phrygia:

http://www.timesonl ine.co.uk/ tol/travel/ destinations/ turkey/article63 43096.ece

Turkey:

http://www.dailymai l.co.uk/travel/ article-1187071/ Six-things- Turkey.html

Ten Pilgrimage sites:

http://online. wsj.com/article/ SB12424243452502 5093.html? mod=googlenews_ wsj

Roman France:

http://travel. nytimes.com/ 2009/05/17/ travel/17romfran ce.html?

Touristy slideshow of Rome:

http://www.cnn. com/2009/ TRAVEL/getaways/ 05/13/travel. snaps.rome/ index.html
============ ========= ========= ========= ========= ========= =======
DIG DIARIES/BLOGS
============ ========= ========= ========= ========= ========= =======
[please send in suggestions! current digs only please!]

Norton Community Archaeological Group:

http://nortoncommar ch.wordpress. com/

Tel Kadesh:

http://sitemaker. umich.edu/ kelseymuseum. digdiary/ read_our_ blog

Tel Dan:

http://teldan. wordpress. com/

Hopkins in Egypt Today:

http://www.jhu. edu/egypttoday/ index.html

============ ========= ========= ========= ========= ========= =======
GENERAL MAGAZINES AND JOURNALS
============ ========= ========= ========= ========= ========= =======
About.com Archaeology:

http://archaeology. about.com/

Archaeorama:

http://blogs. discovery. com/news_ archaeorama/

Archaeoblog:

http://archaeoblog. blogspot. com/

Archaeology Briefs:

http://archaeologyb riefs.blogspot. com/
============ ========= ========= ========= ========= ========= =======
CRIME BEAT
============ ========= ========= ========= ========= ========= =======
Frescoes (and other items) found in that bust on Schoinoussa a
couple of years ago have been returned to Italy:

http://www.google. com/hostednews/ ap/article/ ALeqM5ieF6zwJhG7 nYx0bFa6CN2UH2so NQD989HI0O1
http://www.ansa. it/site/notizie/ awnplus/english/ news/2009- 05-19_119370057. html

... not sure if this one's related:

http://www.bloomber g.com/apps/ news?pid= 20601088& sid=a1km7Oa1Z2SU &refer=muse

Looting Matters:

http://lootingmatte rs.blogspot. com/
============ ========= ========= ========= ========= ========= =======
NUMISMATICA
============ ========= ========= ========= ========= ========= =======
Money Talks:

http://americanhist ory.si.edu/ news/pressreleas e.cfm?key= 29&newskey= 999

Ancient Coin Collecting:

http://ancientcoinc ollecting. blogspot. com/

Ancient Coins:

http://classicalcoi ns.blogspot. com/
============ ========= ========= ========= ========= ========= =======
EXHIBITIONS, AUCTIONS, AND MUSEUM-RELATED
============ ========= ========= ========= ========= ========= =======
Dilettanti:

http://www.nytimes. com/2008/ 08/22/arts/ design/22anti. html

Doors of Heaven:

http://www.nytimes. com/2009/ 05/23/arts/ 23iht-melik23. html

Homer in Papyri:

http://www.ana- mpa.gr/anaweb/ user/showplain? maindoc=7626685& maindocimg= 6239301&service= 144

Skin and Bones:

http://www.nytimes. com/2009/ 05/23/arts/ design/23tatt. html

Developments in the Louvre/Guggenheim project in Abu Dhabi:

http://www.nytimes. com/aponline/ 2009/05/19/ world/AP- ML-Emirates- Museum-Labor. html

The Met's new American wing is reviewed:

http://www.nytimes. com/2009/ 05/22/arts/ design/22amer. html

The Brera Gallery (Milan) is celebrating its 200th anniversary:

http://www.nytimes. com/2009/ 05/23/arts/ 23iht-conway. html

Feature on the director of the Vatican Museums:

http://www.thebosto npilot.com/ article.asp? ID=10416

More hype for the opening of the Acropolis Museum

http://www.nytimes. com/2009/ 05/21/arts/ design/21arts- NEWACROPOLIS_ BRF.html
http://www.ana- mpa.gr/anaweb/ user/showplain? maindoc=7620148& maindocimg= 6484989&service= 102
http://www.independ ent.co.uk/ travel/europe/ elgin-marbles- question- renewed-as- athens-museum- opens-1689481. html
http://www.ekathime rini.com/ 4dcgi/_w_ articles_ politics_ 100006_21/ 05/2009_107367

... and admission is going to be cheap:

http://www.google. com/hostednews/ ap/article/ ALeqM5jV- NVZV8UFR6OU5x4iV mD9lNZVogD98A290 O0

... and of course, the Elgin business is being brought up again:

http://www.independ ent.co.uk/ travel/europe/ elgin-marbles- question- renewed-as- athens-museum- opens-1689481. html

... and the Elgin heirs aren't welcome (!):

http://www.artinfo. com/news/ story/31487/ greeks-to- elgin-heirs- dont-come- to-museum- party/

The Rose is (temporarily? ) closed at Brandeis:

http://www.boston. com/news/ local/massachuse tts/articles/ 2009/05/18/ rose_closes_ __temporarily_ __but_art_ lovers_express_ anguish
>

A number of items were returned to Greece from various sources:

http://www.physorg. com/news16195595 0.html
http://uk.news. yahoo.com/ 18/20090519/ tsc-fifth- century-bc- objects-returned -to-c2ff8aa. html
http://www.dose. ca/news/story. html?id=1609118
http://www.cbc. ca/arts/artdesig n/story/2009/ 05/19/greece- antiquities. html
http://www.canada. com/Ancient+ artifacts+ return+home+ Greece/1609118/ story.html
http://uk.news. yahoo.com/ 18/20090519/ tsc-fifth- century-bc- objects-returned -to-c2ff8aa. html
============ ========= ========= ========= ========= ========= =======
PERFORMANCES AND THEATRE-RELATED
============ ========= ========= ========= ========= ========= =======
Agora:

http://www.guardian .co.uk/film/ 2009/may/ 17/agora- rachel-weisz- cannes-amenabar- minghella
http://www.startrib une.com/entertai nment/movies/ 45254397. html
http://www.screenda ily.com/reviews/ cannes-reviews/ agora/5001280. article
http://latimesblogs .latimes. com/the_big_ picture/2009/ 05/from-cannes- agora-alejandro- amenabars- provocative- new-historical- thriller. html

Night at the Museum II:

http://movies. nytimes.com/ 2009/05/22/ movies/22nigh. html

Ben Hur:

http://www.dailymai l.co.uk/news/ article-1186730/ Like-strapped- pneumatic- drill-Robert- Hardman-goes- spin-chariot- Ben-Hur-hits- Britain.html

Athalia:

http://www.nytimes. com/2009/ 05/19/arts/ music/19hand. html

An Oresteia:

http://timescolumns .typepad. com/stothard/ 2009/05/anne- carson-or- another-sudan- seminar.html
============ ========= ========= ========= ========= ========= =======
ON THE WEB
============ ========= ========= ========= ========= ========= =======
A clickable map of Claudius' harbour at Ostia:

http://www.ostia- antica.org/ portus/plan- claudius. htm
============ ========= ========= ========= ========= ========= =======
OBITUARIES
============ ========= ========= ========= ========= ========= =======
David Herbert Donald:

http://www.nytimes. com/2009/ 05/19/books/ 19donald. html

John Michell:

http://www.independ ent.co.uk/ news/obituaries/ john-michell- expert-on- ancient-knowledg e-and-pioneer- of-the-new- age-1688481. html

Linda Gaskin:

http://www.jacksonv ille.com/ news/metro/ 2009-05-17/ story/linda_ gaskin_1945- 2009_0
============ ========= ========= ========= ========= ========= =======
PODCASTS
============ ========= ========= ========= ========= ========= =======
Naked Archaeology Podcast:

http://www.thenaked scientists. com/HTML/ podcasts/ archaeology/

The Book and the Spade:

http://www.radioscr ibe.com/bknspade .htm

The Dig:

http://www.thedigra dio.com/

Stone Pages Archaeology News:

http://news. stonepages. com/

Archaeologica Audio News:

http://www.archaeol ogychannel. org/AudioNews. asp
============ ========= ========= ========= ========= ========= =======
EXPLORATOR is a weekly newsletter representing the fruits of
the labours of 'media research division' of The Atrium. Various
on-line news and magazine sources are scoured for news of the
ancient world (broadly construed: practically anything relating
to archaeology or history prior to about 1700 or so is fair
game) and every Sunday they are delivered to your mailbox free of
charge!
============ ========= ========= ========= ========= ========= =======
Useful Addresses
============ ========= ========= ========= ========= ========= =======
Past issues of Explorator are available on the web via our
Yahoo site:

http://tech. groups.yahoo. com/group/ Explorator/

To subscribe to Explorator, send a blank email message to:

Explorator-subscrib e@yahoogroups. com

To unsubscribe, send a blank email message to:

Explorator-unsubscr ibe@yahoogroups. com

To send a 'heads up' to the editor or contact him for other
reasons:

rogueclassicist@ gmail.com
============ ========= ========= ========= ========= ========= =======
Explorator is Copyright (c) 2009 David Meadows. Feel free to
distribute these listings via email to your pals, students,
teachers, etc., but please include this copyright notice. These
links are not to be posted to any website by any means (whether
by direct posting or snagging from a usenet group or some other
email source) without my express written permission. I think it
is only right that I be made aware of public fora which are
making use of content gathered in Explorator. Thanks!
============ ========= ========= ========= ========= ========= =======

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]


Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65950 From: Gnaeus Iulius Caesar Date: 2009-05-24
Subject: Re: Some are trying to set up a one candidate race
Cn. Iulius Caesar Caesoni Fabio Buteoni Quintiliano SPD

If this had been researched properly we wouldn't be at a point where we have a candidate, Modianus, on the ballot who even if elected according to the law and the Constitution cannot serve.

The case for Modianus standing rests on the what "No person shall hold the office of censor consecutively" means. The case has been made for just defining "consecutively", however that is applied to "the office of censor".

The Constitution, our highest legal document, supplies the answer. The office of Censor is a two year term that exists regardless of who fills the position. If a person resigns the office of censor remains the same. One office, different holders of the office. So says the Constitution and that definition is the one that must be applied when deciding what "consecutively" means in the Lex Cornelia Iunia de definitione intervallorum magistratuum, by virtue of Section 1.B of the Constitution.

So regardless of whether this proceeds to a vote, the Constitution and the law are clear, Modianus cannot hold the office of Censor. So again there exist two choices:

1. Follow the Constitution and the law

or

2. Break the Constitution and the law.

However unpalatable option (1) maybe to some people, it is better than the pointless exercise of possibly proceeding to elect a person whom the Constitution and law says can never hold that office.

If Modianus were elected and magistrates then ignored the Constitution and the law and allowed him to serve, then clearly everything Modianus would do as Censor on his own would be illegal and null and void and liekwise everything he and any colleague of his did that required collegiate action would also be illegal and null and void.

Optime vale


--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Christer Edling <christer.edling@...> wrote:
>
> Salvete Quirites!
>
> There are arguments for and against the legality of Caeso Fabius Buteo
> Modianus running for Censor. Both sides think that their arguments are
> complete and correct.
>
> But one side has a hidden agenda that has been brought up a few times,
> but always has been drowned in arguments. Their purpose with arguing
> that Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus can't stand for the Censura is that
> they want NO COUNTER-CANDIADATE AGAINST GAIUS EQUITIUS CATO.
>
> I can't come to any other conclusion than that they fear that Cato
> will not be elected if he doesn't stand without competition. How can I
> say that? Well, those who oppose Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus now could
> have taken up this issue before the end date for candidates to
> announce for the Censura, either by bring it up here on the ML or with
> the Consuls. They could of course have done so with the Tribunes too.
> Why didn't they do so?
>
> Honestly not _all_ that question the candidature of Caeso Fabius Buteo
> Modianus has any veiled purposes. Most honest citizens admit that it
> is possible to interpret the law the way that allows Caeso Fabius
> Buteo Modianus to stand, even though they don't support him. They also
> admit that it is too late to try to hinder any of the candidates from
> standing.
>
> But the core of the small group that has been formed around Sulla just
> want _one_ candidate. They _don't_ want to give the people a choice at
> all. Please observe that these are the same people who are obstructing
> all constructive work in the Res Publica, using foul language and
> threatening the Res Publica and Nova Roma Inc. in every way they can.
> If one issue isn't enough they invent a new one. Cato is one of their
> spokesmen, do we need such people in such an important position as the
> Censura? No, we need people who want the Res Publica to thrive,
> develop and grow. We need people that want the Res Publica to organize
> public worship of the Gods and set up RL projects.
>
> Quirites, please don't let this shady group get their way. I say, let
> us vote for Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus as Censor Suffectus, he will
> actively support the Religio and work for the Res Publica to thrive,
> develop and grow!
>
> *****************
> Vale
>
> Caeso Fabius Buteo Quintilianus
>
> Princeps Senatus et Flamen Palatualis
> Civis Romanus sum
> http://www.novaroma.org/nr/Main_Page
> ************************************************
> Aut inveniam viam aut faciam
> "I'll either find a way or make one"
> ************************************************
> Dignitas, Iustitia, Fidelitas et Pietas
> Dignity, Justice, Loyalty and Dutifulness
> ************************************************
> Mons Palatinus, Clivus Victoriae
> Palatine Hill, Incline of Victoriae
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65951 From: Christer Edling Date: 2009-05-24
Subject: Two reasonable people should not fight, even if they don't share opi
Salvete Amici!

I know Decius Junius Palladius to be reasonable person, we two know
each other since many years back and have always been able to talk to
each other, even when we haven't agreed. Decius Junius Palladius has
served as my Accensus during my Consulship, even though he didn't agre
with me in all things and many of his his party-friends didn't want to
talk att all. Both of us are also great fans of the Napoleonic era and
have exchanged thoughts on that subject. .

Lucia Julia Aquila has become a friend during the last 12 to 15
months, I have learnt to respect her and her judgement. I hav every
hope to develop a friendship with her which will be as warm and
friendly as it is with my old opponent, Decius Junius Palladius. She
now stood up to be elected to one of the less glorious positions in
Nova Roma, that of a Diribitor. I think she should be respected and
thanked for that. We all ned to remember that we often need each other
now and inthe future.

Now I am disappointed because I see that Lucia Julia Aquila think that
Decius Junius Palladius is hinting that she will not deal with the
tasks of her Diribitorship fairly and she on her side use a defence
tactic that probaly will close some doors. Both seem to have come to a
state were they risk stop talking to each other.

Let me assure both of You that the other person is an honest and fair
person, worthy of a fair and honest disussion without any indication
of bad intentions. The Internet may at times divide good people and I
am sure that is what is happening in this case. I fear we will never
agree about everything, but as many as possible among us should try to
get to know each other and not always assume the worst from each
other. We have enough problems without good people getting at each
others throats. Please agree to disagree and see if You can't exchange
friendly words on this subjcet or others. The Res Publica needs You
both!

*****************
Vale

Caeso Fabius Buteo Quintilianus

Princeps Senatus et Flamen Palatualis
Civis Romanus sum
http://www.novaroma.org/nr/Main_Page
************************************************
Aut inveniam viam aut faciam
"I'll either find a way or make one"
************************************************
Dignitas, Iustitia, Fidelitas et Pietas
Dignity, Justice, Loyalty and Dutifulness
************************************************
Mons Palatinus, Clivus Victoriae
Palatine Hill, Incline of Victoriae
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65952 From: Jesse Corradino Date: 2009-05-24
Subject: Re: Some are trying to set up a one candidate race NOT
After what Gaius put all of you through recently with his law suit threats only for them to turn out to be groundless I think would ruin any chance he had of winning...  I can't believe your organization even still countenances his presence!  If I was a member, I'd be very upset at what happened after he spent so many days it seemed condescending to people's understanding of the law and their perspectives in general only for it to be revealed that he was wrong entirely by an actual lawyer.  You're bigger people than most if you'd elect him to represent you all in anything after that.
 

To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
From: christer.edling@...
Date: Sun, 24 May 2009 17:29:43 +0200
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Some are trying to set up a one candidate race NOT



Salve Censor!

24 maj 2009 kl. 12.04 skrev Timothy or Stephen Gallagher:

Salvete 
 
"They want NO COUNTER-CANDIDATE AGAINST GAIUS EQUITIUS CATO."
 
"Great Caesar's ghost"!!!
 
It would take the Consuls five minutes to issue a new edict changing the time of the elections and open the call for candidates again. 

CFBQ: Why should they, they have already determined that the partipation of both candidates in the election is legal.

They could have it open for 48 to 96 hours. Then hold the election in accordance with the time requirements of the law.
 
CFBQ: I was not discussing technicalities, but the bad impression some citizen give when they with any possible arguments ty to get the election to become a one candidate race. The rules are already set and to try to convince one and all that we should only have one candidate is quite schocking.

This is not rocket science, but if were the Marine could help : )

CFBQ: I am a Swede and I know very little about the US Marine Corps, but I didn't think they were involved in rocket _science_, except perhaps Censorius Gnaeus Equitius Marinus. ;-)
 
Valete
 
Paulinus



*****************
Vale

Caeso Fabius Buteo Quintilianus

Princeps Senatus et Flamen Palatualis
Civis Romanus sum
************************************************
Aut inveniam viam aut faciam
"I'll either find a way or make one"
************************************************
Dignitas, Iustitia, Fidelitas et Pietas
Dignity, Justice, Loyalty and Dutifulness
************************************************
Mons Palatinus, Clivus Victoriae 
Palatine Hill, Incline of Victoriae 









Windows Liveâ„¢: Keep your life in sync. Check it out.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65953 From: A. Sempronius Regulus Date: 2009-05-24
Subject: Re: our untapped resource
Sigh! Why couldn't it be a Roman Bath?

--- On Sat, 5/23/09, L Julia Aquila <dis_pensible@...> wrote:

From: L Julia Aquila <dis_pensible@...>
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: our untapped resource
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Date: Saturday, May 23, 2009, 6:37 PM

Salve Mariae,

Thank you for this information.

Vale optime,
Julia


Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65954 From: Christer Edling Date: 2009-05-24
Subject: Re: Some are trying to set up a one candidate race
Salve Senatoir!

You know that I think You are a reasonable person, but in this case
your opinion isn't THE truth.

Others has argued for the opposite position and your position is just
your opinion and nothing else. The arguments of the other side are as
valid as yours and I prefer to accept the arguments of your opponents.
They claim them to be as legally correct as You claim yours to be. In
the end the people will decide and You can do nothing about that.

I really don't want to believe that You is trying to push a "one
candiate race "on us all. That would really damage my good opinion
about You.

*********

24 maj 2009 kl. 19.28 skrev Gnaeus Iulius Caesar:

Cn. Iulius Caesar Caesoni Fabio Buteoni Quintiliano SPD

If this had been researched properly we wouldn't be at a point where
we have a candidate, Modianus, on the ballot who even if elected
according to the law and the Constitution cannot serve.

The case for Modianus standing rests on the what "No person shall hold
the office of censor consecutively" means. The case has been made for
just defining "consecutively", however that is applied to "the office
of censor".

The Constitution, our highest legal document, supplies the answer. The
office of Censor is a two year term that exists regardless of who
fills the position. If a person resigns the office of censor remains
the same. One office, different holders of the office. So says the
Constitution and that definition is the one that must be applied when
deciding what "consecutively" means in the Lex Cornelia Iunia de
definitione intervallorum magistratuum, by virtue of Section 1.B of
the Constitution.

So regardless of whether this proceeds to a vote, the Constitution and
the law are clear, Modianus cannot hold the office of Censor. So again
there exist two choices:

1. Follow the Constitution and the law

or

2. Break the Constitution and the law.

However unpalatable option (1) maybe to some people, it is better than
the pointless exercise of possibly proceeding to elect a person whom
the Constitution and law says can never hold that office.

If Modianus were elected and magistrates then ignored the Constitution
and the law and allowed him to serve, then clearly everything Modianus
would do as Censor on his own would be illegal and null and void and
liekwise everything he and any colleague of his did that required
collegiate action would also be illegal and null and void.

Optime vale


--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Christer Edling
<christer.edling@...> wrote:
>
> Salvete Quirites!
>
> There are arguments for and against the legality of Caeso Fabius Buteo
> Modianus running for Censor. Both sides think that their arguments are
> complete and correct.
>
> But one side has a hidden agenda that has been brought up a few times,
> but always has been drowned in arguments. Their purpose with arguing
> that Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus can't stand for the Censura is that
> they want NO COUNTER-CANDIADATE AGAINST GAIUS EQUITIUS CATO.
>
> I can't come to any other conclusion than that they fear that Cato
> will not be elected if he doesn't stand without competition. How can I
> say that? Well, those who oppose Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus now could
> have taken up this issue before the end date for candidates to
> announce for the Censura, either by bring it up here on the ML or with
> the Consuls. They could of course have done so with the Tribunes too.
> Why didn't they do so?
>
> Honestly not _all_ that question the candidature of Caeso Fabius Buteo
> Modianus has any veiled purposes. Most honest citizens admit that it
> is possible to interpret the law the way that allows Caeso Fabius
> Buteo Modianus to stand, even though they don't support him. They also
> admit that it is too late to try to hinder any of the candidates from
> standing.
>
> But the core of the small group that has been formed around Sulla just
> want _one_ candidate. They _don't_ want to give the people a choice at
> all. Please observe that these are the same people who are obstructing
> all constructive work in the Res Publica, using foul language and
> threatening the Res Publica and Nova Roma Inc. in every way they can.
> If one issue isn't enough they invent a new one. Cato is one of their
> spokesmen, do we need such people in such an important position as the
> Censura? No, we need people who want the Res Publica to thrive,
> develop and grow. We need people that want the Res Publica to organize
> public worship of the Gods and set up RL projects.
>
> Quirites, please don't let this shady group get their way. I say, let
> us vote for Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus as Censor Suffectus, he will
> actively support the Religio and work for the Res Publica to thrive,
> develop and grow!
>
> *****************
> Vale
>
> Caeso Fabius Buteo Quintilianus
>
> Princeps Senatus et Flamen Palatualis
> Civis Romanus sum
> http://www.novaroma.org/nr/Main_Page
> ************************************************
> Aut inveniam viam aut faciam
> "I'll either find a way or make one"
> ************************************************
> Dignitas, Iustitia, Fidelitas et Pietas
> Dignity, Justice, Loyalty and Dutifulness
> ************************************************
> Mons Palatinus, Clivus Victoriae
> Palatine Hill, Incline of Victoriae
>




------------------------------------

Yahoo! Groups Links
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65955 From: Maior Date: 2009-05-24
Subject: Re: NR Floralia updates
M. Hortensia Gn Cornelio Lentulo spd;
agh! I am filled with the best kind of envy, Lentulus amice. I wish I were there to see you and Corde and Livia, Dexter. ..etc It would absolutely fantastic. Please send a big 'salvete' to everyone,

I hope you are taking lots of pics and videos of rituals. I'm sure the gods love you for all you are doing for them; especially at a genuine Roman altar!
bene vale in pacem deorum
M. Hortensia Maior
>
> I am impressed of your hard work for the Res Pubica and the Religio!
> Please continue your fine work! Also send my heartfelt greetings to
> your Nova Roma companions! It was a long time since I met Cordus, so
> please send him my warmest greetings! To all others, including
> yourself that I haven't met, please say that I look forward to meet
> for the first time.
>
> I will include You in my prayers to Palatua! May she protect You all
> in the name of the old city!
>
> *****
>
> 23 maj 2009 kl. 00.10 skrev Cn. Cornelius Lentulus:
>
>
>
> Cn. Lentulus leg. pr. pr. Quiritibus sal.
>
>
> Just a very quick information, that our guests, A. Apollonius Cordus,
> C. Petronius Dexter, Sex. Lucilius Tutor and Martina arrived well and
> we've spent a wonderful afternoon together, visiting historical and
> famous sites of Budapest, and ending with a dinner.
>
> I must say that talking with Codus in person and listening to his deep
> thoughts about modern Romanitas and how to approach our most important
> questions was a wonderful experience, and I've also recieved a
> wonderful gift from him (a Roman denarius from the republican period,
> with a Cornelius on it!!). I waited 5 years for this day: to meet my
> friend!
>
> C. Petronius is a wonderfully nice, polite and humourous person, I
> highly enjoyed our conversations in Latin with him and Cordus, and I
> found Petronius a very modest person with a huge knowledge and
> education. It is gift from Gods to spend this time with Flamen
> Portunalis Petronius.
>
> Sex. Lucilius Tutor and Matina are just sleeping at my home, very
> tired of the visiting all the city. They were so warm and nice that I
> wish to call them my brother and sister. They make me know what the
> best and most important part of Nova Roma is: friendship without
> boundaries.
>
> Now, I return to write the coreography texts to the performances, and
> I prepare to the real Nova Roman ceremony for honouring the 2000th
> year of Roman presence in Pannonia, and for praying for the future of
> Nova Roma.
>
> This will be my first public sacrifice as a pontifex, so I will
> consider it as some kind of ritual investiture to the office. (Your
> payers are welcome!)
>
> My Roman greetings from Aquincum, in the name Livia, Cordus,
> Petronius, Tutor and Martina, as well as other Pannonians, Porcius,
> Vestricius, Lucretia, Popillia, Arrius and everyone! Together with our
> allied organizations, Nova Roma will be present with at leat 30 people!!
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *****************
> Vale
>
> Caeso Fabius Buteo Quintilianus
>
> Princeps Senatus et Flamen Palatualis
> Civis Romanus sum
> http://www.novaroma.org/nr/Main_Page
> ************************************************
> Aut inveniam viam aut faciam
> "I'll either find a way or make one"
> ************************************************
> Dignitas, Iustitia, Fidelitas et Pietas
> Dignity, Justice, Loyalty and Dutifulness
> ************************************************
> Mons Palatinus, Clivus Victoriae
> Palatine Hill, Incline of Victoriae
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65956 From: L Julia Aquila Date: 2009-05-24
Subject: Re: Two reasonable people should not fight, even if they don't share
L. Iulia Aquila C. Fabio Buteoni Quintiliano D. Iunio Palladio S.P.D.


Thank you for this post.
It is not just from the great respect I have for my amící, Caeso Fabius Buteo Quintilianus, although this is a very positive influence, which brings me to extending the olive branch to my fellow esteemed citizen, Decius Iunius Palladius.
I believe that we can work together for the Respublica and respect each other even more for the courage to voice our opinions even if they differ. Differences in opinions often lead to a quality end result that represents the best of differing opinions. I believe we both agree that we will both work hard towards the progress and success of Nova Roma and that unites us in a unique way.
And so I offer an olive branch to Decius Iunius Palladius and look forward to working with him in the future towards our common goal.

Valete,
L. Julia Aquila



--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Christer Edling <christer.edling@...> wrote:
>
> Salvete Amici!
>
> I know Decius Junius Palladius to be reasonable person, we two know
> each other since many years back and have always been able to talk to
> each other, even when we haven't agreed. Decius Junius Palladius has
> served as my Accensus during my Consulship, even though he didn't agre
> with me in all things and many of his his party-friends didn't want to
> talk att all. Both of us are also great fans of the Napoleonic era and
> have exchanged thoughts on that subject. .
>
> Lucia Julia Aquila has become a friend during the last 12 to 15
> months, I have learnt to respect her and her judgement. I hav every
> hope to develop a friendship with her which will be as warm and
> friendly as it is with my old opponent, Decius Junius Palladius. She
> now stood up to be elected to one of the less glorious positions in
> Nova Roma, that of a Diribitor. I think she should be respected and
> thanked for that. We all ned to remember that we often need each other
> now and inthe future.
>
> Now I am disappointed because I see that Lucia Julia Aquila think that
> Decius Junius Palladius is hinting that she will not deal with the
> tasks of her Diribitorship fairly and she on her side use a defence
> tactic that probaly will close some doors. Both seem to have come to a
> state were they risk stop talking to each other.
>
> Let me assure both of You that the other person is an honest and fair
> person, worthy of a fair and honest disussion without any indication
> of bad intentions. The Internet may at times divide good people and I
> am sure that is what is happening in this case. I fear we will never
> agree about everything, but as many as possible among us should try to
> get to know each other and not always assume the worst from each
> other. We have enough problems without good people getting at each
> others throats. Please agree to disagree and see if You can't exchange
> friendly words on this subjcet or others. The Res Publica needs You
> both!
>
> *****************
> Vale
>
> Caeso Fabius Buteo Quintilianus
>
> Princeps Senatus et Flamen Palatualis
> Civis Romanus sum
> http://www.novaroma.org/nr/Main_Page
> ************************************************
> Aut inveniam viam aut faciam
> "I'll either find a way or make one"
> ************************************************
> Dignitas, Iustitia, Fidelitas et Pietas
> Dignity, Justice, Loyalty and Dutifulness
> ************************************************
> Mons Palatinus, Clivus Victoriae
> Palatine Hill, Incline of Victoriae
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65957 From: enodia2002 Date: 2009-05-24
Subject: Post-Cannes Reaction to "AGORA"
Post-Cannes Reaction to “Agora”

The movie “Agora”, which centers on the life of Neoplatonist pagan philosopher Hypatia, had its first official screening at the Cannes Film Festival and initial reviews are trickling in from the entertainment press. While some thought the epic overreached and fell a bit flat, others, like Variety’s Todd McCarthy, thinks the film succeeds with its handling of difficult subjects despite some “dramaturgical” shortcomings.


Director Alejandro Amenábar with Rachel Weisz

“…there is much in the picture to sustain sympathetic interest, including its dedicated historical perspective, intellectual seriousness and credible presentation of epic film elements that have often tripped up filmmakers in the past. Then there is the physical side of the production, which is genuinely impressive. Lensing entirely in Malta, Amenabar has fleshed out real locations with extensive sets and helpful (and largely undetectable) CGI extensions to provide a striking impression of a legendary ancient city. Production designer Guy Hendrix Dyas has mixed traditional Greco-Roman style buildings with Egyptian motifs and various interior decorative influences to palpably evoke a Mediterranean port city where many cultures convened. Gabriella Pescucci’s costumes colorfully support this approach, and Xavi Gimenez’s widescreen lensing captures it all with colorful mobility. Dario Marianelli’s score is rich, with occasional swells into the bombastic.”

Also speaking positively about the film are the Hollywood Reporter’s Natasha Senjanovic, who says that Rachel Weisz gives an “unfaltering” performance as Hypatia, and Patrick Goldstein of the Los Angeles Times who calls the film rich in “visual imagination”. As for the historical accuracy buffs, The Guardian’s Charlotte Higgins calls “Agora” a “gift to classicists”.

“Classicists are going to have a field day with Alejandro Amenábar’s Agora, which premiered yesterday at the Cannes film festival. Starring Rachel Weisz as Hypatia, the 4th- to 5th-century Alexandrian astronomer, philosopher and mathematician, who was brutally killed by an angry Christian mob, it avoids some of the pitfalls of movies set in the ancient world. The characters behave naturally and speak normally, without either jolting archaisms or ridiculous anachronisms, and the world that has been created to stand in for Alexandria â€" a huge set on Malta â€" works well, with minimum CGI nastiness and an obvious attention to historical detail. The costumes and the “look” of the characters was based on Romano-Egyptian mummy portraits, said Amenábar at his press conference, and that was deftly done.”

Even better, Higgins assures us that the film manages to “deftly” include the famous tale of Hypatia repelling a suitor by showing him her menstrual rags. Also reassuring to those worried that Hypatia the virgin philosopher would be thrust into romance is this comment by director Alejandro Amenabar when counselling Rachel Weisz in the role.

“Rachel had accepted the part, but then she grew worried about that solitude, so she called me one day to talk,” Amenabar recalls. “I told her, ‘Remember, I’m not offering you the part of the scientist’s wife. You are the scientist. And you are very much in love â€" you’re just in love with the sky.’ ”

So it looks like “Agora” really will be a treat for Pagan film-goers once it sees wide release in December. Prepare to ramp up your expectations! I can’t wait to see this one on the big screen.

Tags: Agora, Christianity, film, Hypatia, movies, Paganism
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65958 From: C. Maria Caeca Date: 2009-05-24
Subject: Re: our untapped resource
I'd be up for a Roman bath ... or a really good taberna, or even a lovely atrium ... but what we have is what we have, and the chat room is available and open, and I'm there.  Come on in, the water is fine, and the slaves attentive, LOL!
 
C. Maria Caeca
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65959 From: Gnaeus Iulius Caesar Date: 2009-05-24
Subject: Re: Some are trying to set up a one candidate race
Cn. Iulius Caesar Caesoni Fabio Buteoni Quintiliano SPD
I can't push anything. On the Consuls can "push" on this matter, or not as the case maybe. I have pointed out what the Constitution says and the law says. That isn't a question of my opinion, but rather of reading the Constitution and applying it to the Lex Cornelia Iunia de definitione intervallorum magistratuum. Ultimately if the Consuls elect not to act then the circumstances will unfold as I have outlined.
 
If your opinion of me is damaged by my pointing out what the Constitution and law says, and providing the Constitutional definition of what "office of censor means" and applying "consecutively" to that, well there isn't anything I can do to prevent you thinking what you will, but the words of the Constitution and the law will not change whether or not I say anything, you do, or the Consuls. Unpalatable facts remain facts. 
 
Optime valete
 

Sent: Sunday, May 24, 2009 12:07 PM
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: Some are trying to set up a one candidate race

Salve Senatoir!

You know that I think You are a reasonable person, but in this case 
your opinion isn't THE truth.

Others has argued for the opposite position and your position is just 
your opinion and nothing else. The arguments of the other side are as 
valid as yours and I prefer to accept the arguments of your opponents. 
They claim them to be as legally correct as You claim yours to be. In 
the end the people will decide and You can do nothing about that.

I really don't want to believe that You is trying to push a "one 
candiate race "on us all. That would really damage my good opinion 
about You.

*********

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65960 From: C. Maria Caeca Date: 2009-05-24
Subject: Re: Post-Cannes Reaction to "AGORA"
Salve Enodia et salvete omnes,

Now *that* is 1 movie I will make every effort to see, and before it comes
out on DVD, too, LOL!

Caeca
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65961 From: Maior Date: 2009-05-24
Subject: Re: Some are trying to set up a one candidate race
Salve Caesar;
no you pointed out 'your opinion' of the law and 'your opinion' of what the law says. And that's all it is and of course you are certainly entitled to it: but it's just your opinion.

Now leave the rest of the cives to make up their own minds and form their own opinions; they are equally valid.
optime vale
Marca Hortensia Maior


I have pointed out what the Constitution says and the law says. That isn't a question of my opinion, but rather of reading the Constitution and applying it to the Lex Cornelia Iunia de definitione intervallorum magistratuum. Ultimately if the Consuls elect not to act then the circumstances will unfold as I have outlined.
>
> If your opinion of me is damaged by my pointing out what the Constitution and law says, and providing the Constitutional definition of what "office of censor means" and applying "consecutively" to that, well there isn't anything I can do to prevent you thinking what you will, but the words of the Constitution and the law will not change whether or not I say anything, you do, or the Consuls. Unpalatable facts remain facts.
>
> Optime valete
>
>
>
> From: Christer Edling
> Sent: Sunday, May 24, 2009 12:07 PM
> To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: Some are trying to set up a one candidate race
>
>
> Salve Senatoir!
>
> You know that I think You are a reasonable person, but in this case
> your opinion isn't THE truth.
>
> Others has argued for the opposite position and your position is just
> your opinion and nothing else. The arguments of the other side are as
> valid as yours and I prefer to accept the arguments of your opponents.
> They claim them to be as legally correct as You claim yours to be. In
> the end the people will decide and You can do nothing about that.
>
> I really don't want to believe that You is trying to push a "one
> candiate race "on us all. That would really damage my good opinion
> about You.
>
> *********
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65962 From: Gnaeus Iulius Caesar Date: 2009-05-24
Subject: Re: Some are trying to set up a one candidate race
Caesar Maori SPD.
 
Then provide me with a credible alternative to the what the Constitution says, for if my repeating those words becomes an "opinion", then I would be interested to see how you change their very clear meaning in your "opinion".
 
I know some people are trying to promulgate the view that a vote electing Modianus will somehow invalidate the stipulation of the law that he cannot hold the office of Censor, but it won't, nor would it invalidate the Constitution.
 
Optime vale.

From: Maior
Sent: Sunday, May 24, 2009 12:46 PM
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Some are trying to set up a one candidate race

Salve Caesar;
 no you pointed out 'your opinion' of the law and 'your opinion' of what the law says. And that's all it is and  of course you are certainly entitled to it: but it's just your opinion.
     
Now leave the rest of the cives to make up their own minds and form their own opinions; they are equally valid.
                        optime vale
                        Marca Hortensia Maior


 I have pointed out what the Constitution says and the law says. That isn't a question of my opinion, but rather of reading the Constitution and applying it to the Lex Cornelia Iunia de definitione intervallorum magistratuum. Ultimately if the Consuls elect not to act then the circumstances will unfold as I have outlined.
>
> If
your opinion of me is damaged by my pointing out what the Constitution and law says, and providing the Constitutional definition of what "office of censor means" and applying "consecutively" to that, well there isn't anything I can do to prevent you thinking what you will, but the words of the Constitution and the law will not change whether or not I say anything, you do, or the Consuls. Unpalatable facts remain facts. 
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65963 From: Christer Edling Date: 2009-05-24
Subject: Re: Some are trying to set up a one candidate race
Salve Senator!

That You stand for your _opinion_ just make me respect You more, but when some argue the same as You do they, including Cato himself, also want Cato to be the only candidate. This is what worries me. 

If You want a "one candidate race" my respect for You sadly will diminish, but still this is not the only position on which I will base my impression of You.

 
If your opinion of me is damaged by my pointing out what the Constitution and law says, and providing the Constitutional definition of what "office of censor means" and applying "consecutively" to that, well there isn't anything I can do to prevent you thinking what you will, but the words of the Constitution and the law will not change whether or not I say anything, you do, or the Consuls. Unpalatable facts remain facts. 
 
Optime valete
 



*****************
Vale

Caeso Fabius Buteo Quintilianus

Princeps Senatus et Flamen Palatualis
Civis Romanus sum
************************************************
Aut inveniam viam aut faciam
"I'll either find a way or make one"
************************************************
Dignitas, Iustitia, Fidelitas et Pietas
Dignity, Justice, Loyalty and Dutifulness
************************************************
Mons Palatinus, Clivus Victoriae 
Palatine Hill, Incline of Victoriae 





Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65964 From: L Julia Aquila Date: 2009-05-24
Subject: Re: our untapped resource
Iulia Mariae Semproni S.P.D.

Sounds good to me also.
But allow me to play the devil's advocate here, something I nevvverrrr do, *laugh* and ask a question.
This is not going to be historically accurate so it would be a co-ed Roman bath, correct? This I might attend from time to time;)

Valete,
Julia

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "A. Sempronius Regulus" <asempronius.regulus@...> wrote:
>
> Sigh! Why couldn't it be a Roman Bath?
>
> --- On Sat, 5/23/09, L Julia Aquila <dis_pensible@...> wrote:
>
>
> From: L Julia Aquila <dis_pensible@...>
> Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: our untapped resource
> To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> Date: Saturday, May 23, 2009, 6:37 PM
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Salve Mariae,
>
> Thank you for this information.
>
> Vale optime,
> Julia
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65965 From: C. Maria Caeca Date: 2009-05-24
Subject: Re: our untapped resource
Um ...curtains for modesty's sake?

Caeca
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65966 From: Gnaeus Iulius Caesar Date: 2009-05-24
Subject: Re: Some are trying to set up a one candidate race
Cn. Iulius Caesar Caesoni Fabio Buteoni Quintiliano SPD

I am well used to standing up for holding to the Constitution and the law, regardless of popularity issues.

What I want or don't want is not the issue. The issue is the Constitution provides the definition of "office of censor". What follows from that can be ignored, the Constitution can be ignored, the can be law ignored, and the consequences of electing someone who cannot legally serve can be ignored too. None of that makes it right or prudent to do so. None of that makes the consequences go away.

Ultimately as the Consuls are running the election it is what they want. If I wanted a fifty canddiate race or a one candidate race, it wouldn't be the issue. The issue is what the constitution and law clearly says, and it says Modianus cannot serve as Censor.

If you dispute that, provide me with a credible alternative to the definition of office of censor as provided in the Constitution and show why that definition doesn't apply to the Lex Cornelia Iunia de definitione intervallorum magistratuum and how Section 1.B of the Constitution doesn't apply. If you or others cannot, then the law and constitution are clear, he cannot serve as Censor.

There are people today who believe the earth is flat despite having the evidence to the contrary pointed out, or those creationists who dismiss fossil evidence and insist the earth is only thousands of years old. I have given the evidence that shows Modianus even if elected, cannot serve and people are ignoring it. That doesn't invalidate the facts and words of the Constitution.

Optime valete



--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Christer Edling <christer.edling@...> wrote:
>
> Salve Senator!
>
> That You stand for your _opinion_ just make me respect You more, but
> when some argue the same as You do they, including Cato himself, also
> want Cato to be the only candidate. This is what worries me.
>
> If You want a "one candidate race" my respect for You sadly will
> diminish, but still this is not the only position on which I will base
> my impression of You.
>
>
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65967 From: L Julia Aquila Date: 2009-05-24
Subject: Re: our untapped resource
Well I was thinking more along the lines of a swimsuit with a tunic over it... *laughs*
~Julia

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "C. Maria Caeca" <shoshanahathaway@...> wrote:
>
> Um ...curtains for modesty's sake?
>
> Caeca
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65968 From: David Kling Date: 2009-05-24
Subject: Re: Latin Mass to Vernacular, was Re: Consecutive Terms
Salve:

Agreed!  Many of the reform of Vatican II radically changed the beauty of Catholicism and that is very unfortunate.  Architecture and church make-up was, as you say, a part of the "renovation" plans of Vatican II and most were very dreadful.  I know many Protestant churches that are horribly decorated and arranged, and after Vatican II it seems Catholicism wanted to cash in on ugly!  Thankfully, the Orthodox still have beautiful churches and liturgy.

Vale;

Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus

On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 12:25 PM, Publius Ullerius Stephanus Venator <famila.ulleria.venii@...> wrote:


Ave Modianus;

Another thing the modernization of the Mass (and Church) gave my home
parish was a "renovation" of the sanctuary due to the greater say the
laity had in running the parish.

We had a beautiful Carerra marble High Altar with complementary side
altars (one to Saint Anne, patroness of our parish and one to the Holy
Family) at the northern end of the church. Lovely, traditional
Stations of the Cross around the periphery, murals on the ceiling,
marble Baptismal font and so forth.

The barbarian modernists convinced the folk of the parish that a more
modern, "pop-culture" altar with a wooden, wall-mounted statue of
Jesus mounted on a new wall, which covered the stained glass windows
in the center third of the western wall would be better.

A lot of the younger people of my peer group began questioning; if the
"one, true Holy Mother Church" had to change so much, was it worth
staying?

Only things of the "old-fashioned church" left were the ceiling,
stained glass windows the frontspiece of the original altar, mounted
on the "crying room" they built where the high altar used to stand.

Now, about 35 years later, my home parish is gone. 4 generations of
my family were baptized, married and laid to rest there. RIP Saint
Anne's Church, W Springfield, MA.

Vale - Venator
(who does have a sentimental view of his upbringing and respect for
his forebears)




Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65969 From: David Kling Date: 2009-05-24
Subject: Re: MY SUPPORT FOR K. FABIUS BUTEO MODIANUS
Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus Quintae Fabiae Drusillae salutem dicit

Thank you for your kind words.  Much appreciated.

Vale;

Modianus

On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 6:06 AM, Drusilla <fabiadrusilla@...> wrote:


Salvete
 
I was undecided who to vote in this election to the censorship.
 
The arguments about the validity of the candidacies seem futile and just election propaganda.

What I really decided to choose one candidate is the impression that one candidate is a fan (I do not know that) and the other looks like a reasonable person,
one of the candidates said to be in possession of the truth,  the other dialogue.
 
I have decided to vote K. Fabius Buteo Modianus because I'm tired of reading messages from Equitius Cato saying: I am right, the truth is mine, everything is done in Nova Roma is illegal, I am going to complain you.  (I'm also tired of reading messages from Cornelius Sulla and others with the same arguments)
 
Please citizens, vote to K. Fabius Buteo Modianus for Censor. He has proven to be the best choice for this office.
 
Valete
 
Quinta Fabia Drusilla



Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65970 From: David Kling Date: 2009-05-24
Subject: Re: NR Floralia updates
Wouldn't it!  Fantastic to see so many Nova Romans together in ritual and ceremony.  Now if we Americans can stop fighting maybe we too could get together in ritual and ceremony and show our piety to the Gods.

Vale;

Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus

On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 2:12 PM, Maior <rory12001@...> wrote:


M. Hortensia Gn Cornelio Lentulo spd;
agh! I am filled with the best kind of envy, Lentulus amice. I wish I were there to see you and Corde and Livia, Dexter. ..etc It would absolutely fantastic. Please send a big 'salvete' to everyone,

I hope you are taking lots of pics and videos of rituals. I'm sure the gods love you for all you are doing for them; especially at a genuine Roman altar!
bene vale in pacem deorum
M. Hortensia Maior




Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65971 From: Publius Ullerius Stephanus Venator Date: 2009-05-24
Subject: Re: Latin Mass to Vernacular, was Re: Consecutive Terms
Salve;

On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 2:50 PM, David Kling wrote:
>
> Salve:
>
> Agreed!  Many of the reform of Vatican II radically changed the beauty of
> Catholicism and that is very unfortunate.  Architecture and church make-up
> was, as you say, a part of the "renovation" plans of Vatican II and most
> were very dreadful.  I know many Protestant churches that are horribly
> decorated and arranged, and after Vatican II it seems Catholicism wanted to
> cash in on ugly!  Thankfully, the Orthodox still have beautiful churches and
> liturgy.
>
> Vale;
>

The biggest Greek church back home has been located in an old
Episcopal, Gothic style church for several decades. They have kept it
up quite nicely.

When they split into two factions, the younger, more suburban crowd
built a new church, which is much more post Vatican II in style.

The Russian and Ukrainian church back there are both that "onion top"
basilican style.

After Gothic churches and cathedrals, the style of architecture I like
best is the New England meeting house; plain, sturdy, comfortable, a
community building.

The tackiest one I've ever seen; a small, old-line New England
evangelical group that took over a HoJo's and kept the orange roof for
a few years. They had one of those "Jesus Saves" signs out front,
which looked like they had reconditioned an "S&H Green Stamps"
marquee.

Ah well, to each their own.

Vale - Venator
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65972 From: C. Maria Caeca Date: 2009-05-24
Subject: Re: our untapped resource
Yeah, bathing attire would work :)

Caeca
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65973 From: David Kling Date: 2009-05-24
Subject: Re: Latin Mass to Vernacular, was Re: Consecutive Terms
Salve:

There is a Greek Orthodox cathedral here in Columbus Ohio that is very nice.  I've been in several Orthodox and a few Byzantine Rite churches and they have been nice.  I went to one several years ago that was a part of the Russian Orthodox Church Outside of Russia, a very conservative branch of Orthodoxy, and it was more of a chapel on the property of the priest who was also a dermatologist during the week.  Very small, but felt like walking into the "old country" right in the middle of Ohio.  I was at a Melkite Greek Catholic church once in New Jersey that had four deacons, and two would chant in Arabic -- which was very beautiful juxtaposed with English.

On a different topic, but still focusing on religion, there is a Vedic Temple just a few miles from me now that I've never visited but am hoping to do so more of this summer.  I used to attend the Hindu Temple at Beavercreek Ohio several years ago and liked attending the puja rituals.  I find most forms of liturgical prayer relaxing, and certainly have my favorites.

Vale;

Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus

On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 4:05 PM, Publius Ullerius Stephanus Venator <famila.ulleria.venii@...> wrote:


Salve;



On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 2:50 PM, David Kling wrote:
>
> Salve:
>
> Agreed!  Many of the reform of Vatican II radically changed the beauty of
> Catholicism and that is very unfortunate.  Architecture and church make-up
> was, as you say, a part of the "renovation" plans of Vatican II and most
> were very dreadful.  I know many Protestant churches that are horribly
> decorated and arranged, and after Vatican II it seems Catholicism wanted to
> cash in on ugly!  Thankfully, the Orthodox still have beautiful churches and
> liturgy.
>
> Vale;
>

The biggest Greek church back home has been located in an old
Episcopal, Gothic style church for several decades. They have kept it
up quite nicely.

When they split into two factions, the younger, more suburban crowd
built a new church, which is much more post Vatican II in style.

The Russian and Ukrainian church back there are both that "onion top"
basilican style.

After Gothic churches and cathedrals, the style of architecture I like
best is the New England meeting house; plain, sturdy, comfortable, a
community building.

The tackiest one I've ever seen; a small, old-line New England
evangelical group that took over a HoJo's and kept the orange roof for
a few years. They had one of those "Jesus Saves" signs out front,
which looked like they had reconditioned an "S&H Green Stamps"
marquee.

Ah well, to each their own.

Vale - Venator



Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65974 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2009-05-24
Subject: Re: consecutive
Re: [Nova-Roma] consecutive

  

  A. Tullia Scholastica M. Lucretio Agricolae quiritibus bonae voluntatis S.P.D.

From the Oxford English Dictionary:

CONSECUTIVE

1. Following continuously; following each its predecessor in uninterrupted succession.

    ATS:  Though its Latin source, consequor, is, as you, Agricola, probably know, a bit more liberal in its interpretation.  We are, however, speaking English here, not Latin (though we ought to be...).  

---

The OED gives the above as the first definition of "consecutive". The first recorded use of the word with this meaning is dated 1611. "Consecutive" does not simply mean "following", it means following in a specific manner, that is, "continuously", without interruption.

Since the censorship of Laenas intervenes, no law stands in the way of Modianus to candidate for or hold the office of censor.

    ATS:  I would like to point out that when I became a citizen, Marinus was both my provincial governor and curule aedile.  He told me that he had served as aedilis curulis the preceding year, and that there was a hue and cry about that.  One term was suffectus, but I am not sure which one it was (probably, however, the preceding year).  The case of Placidus is rather different (if memory serves), as he wanted two full terms served consecutively, but the intervening portion of the term served by Laenas would seem to indicate that we cannot interpret the candidacy of Modianus as being consecutive.  Unwise, perhaps; irregular, perhaps, but not strictly consecutive.  The first adjective might also be applied to that of the other candidate, who said that the censura seemed like fun, but to date has never served in the officium censorum either as rogator or scriba, or participated in the nomenclature research, and has drafted legislation preventing the assumption of the censura by someone who has not held the consulatus, as he has not.  

    As some have noted, it might be better to start this all over again.  Surely attacks on the candidacy of one candidate which began AFTER the period for acceptance was over bear more than a hint of a desire for an uncontested election, followed by the installation of a convert to their faction.  The proper time for such questions preceded that deadline, and should not follow it.  

MLA:  The meaning of "consecutive" has remained stable in standard English usage for five centuries. No other interpretation is possible of the English words used.

For those who may not know, I am by training and trade an applied linguist, and as such I hold a university faculty position.

The Oxford English Dictionary is the largest and most comprehensive dictionary of English and it is the gold standard for the denotation of English words.

    ATS:  Indeed, and the OLD is its Latin equivalent.  

Agricola

  Vale, et valete.
    

     
   Messages in this topic           <http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma/message/65736
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65975 From: L Julia Aquila Date: 2009-05-24
Subject: Re: Classic Poetry, Prose, Proems
Salvete Omnes,

This hours selections are from Disticha Catonis translated by J. Marchand:
BK1 Distich 3
I think the first virtue to be keeping your tongue;
He is close to God who knows how to keep quiet properly.

Virtutem primam esse puto compescere linguam:
Proximus ille deo est, qui scit ratione tacere.


BK1 Distich 7
Be constant and kind, as the case demands;
The wise man changes his ways as time demands without fault.

Constans et lenis, ut res expostulat, esto:
Temporibus mores sapiens sine crimine mutat.


BK1 Distich 15
Remember to tell publicly of favors by others;
And you yourself, when you do good to others, be silent about it

Officium alterius multis narrare memento,
Atque aliis cum tu bene feceris ipse, sileto.


Bk2 Districh 14
Be of strong mind when you are wrongly accused;
No one is happy for long who wins with an injust judgment.

Esto animo forti, cum sis damnatus inique;
Nemo diu gaudet, qui iudice vincit iniquo.


BK2 Districh 18
Be stupid when the time or situation demands;
To fake stupidity is at times the highest prudence.

Insipiens esto, cum tempus postulat aut res;
Stultitiam simulare loco prudentia summa est.


Bk2 Districh 20
Do not always believe someone who tells things;
Little credence is to be paid (to them), because they talk a lot.

Noli tu quaedam referenti credere semper;
Exigua est tribuenda fides, quia multa loquuntur.


BK2 Distich 27
Look at what has happened, and see that which is coming;
Imitate that god who looks in both directions (Janus).

Quod sequitur specta, quodque imminet ante videto;
Illum imitare deum, partem qui spectat utramque.


BK2 Distich 29
Never spurn public opinion alone,
Lest you please no one when you want to spurn many.

Iudicium populi numquam contempseris unus,
Ne nulli placeas, dum vis contemnere multos.


Bk3 Distich 13
Learn from the examples of many what deeds you should emulate
And which to avoid; the life of others is a mistress (teacher) to us.

Multorum disce exemplis, quae facta sequaris,
Quae fugias; vita est nobis aliena magistra.


Bk3 Distich 15
That which you know to be wrongly done, do not conceal,
Lest by keeping silence you seem to be willing to imitate wrongdoers.

Quod nosti haud recte factum, nolito tacere,
Ne videare malos imitari velle tacendo.


Bk3 Distich 17
That which you bear by right, remember to bear patiently,
And when you stand guilty before yourself, judge yourself strictly.

Quod merito pateris, patienter ferre memento,
Cumque reus tibi sis, ipsum te iudice damna.


Bk4 Distich 9
Whatever is suspect to you, immediately test what it is;
For those things which are at first ignored often harm.

Quod tibi suspectum est, confestim discute, quid sit;
Namque solent, primo quae sunt neglecta, nocere.


Bk4 Distich 13
Ask for aid from your associates when you are in travail;
No one is a better doctor than a faithful friend.

Auxilium a notis petito, si forte labores;
Nec quisquam melior medicus quam fidus amicus.


BK 4 Distich 20
Look quietly upon all things that people say;
The speech of men hides their ways and reveals them also.

Prospicito cuncta tacitus, quid quisque loquatur;
Sermo hominum mores celat et indicat idem.


Bk4 Distich 26
In peaceful times always be on the lookout for adverse things,
And again, in bad times, remember always to hope for better.

Tranquillis rebus semper adversa timeto,
Rursus in adversis melius sperare memento.


Valete,
Julia
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65976 From: Gnaeus Iulius Caesar Date: 2009-05-24
Subject: Re: consecutive
Re: [Nova-Roma] consecutive
Cn. Iulius Caesar A. Tulliae Scholasticae SPD
 
You said: " but the intervening portion of the term served by Laenas would seem to indicate that we cannot interpret the candidacy of Modianus as being consecutive"
 
The Constitution provides the definition of what "the office of Censor" means. Consecutively is applied to that definition. As the "office of Censor" is defined in the Constitution as being the term of two years regardless of whether someone steps down, Laenas' time in office doesn't become a term in its own right. It is a slice of the same cake, not a cake in its own right. Consecutively is applied to the whole cake, the whole term. Therefore Modianus' own term is consecutive to the one he is seeking election to. Therefore the situation with Placidus is not different. Even if there had been someone in the office of the Curule Aedile who resigned and who Placidus sought to replace, the Constitution would apply. Whether the office is empty or filled, it is just a slice of the same pie. This fact is reinforced (as an aside) by the fact that in the case of a suffectus, Century Points are awarded for the whole term and split between who ever holds the office. There are not multiple terms, just one term for one office, with different people in that office. Whichever way you turn, the Constitution and the laws point to a term as being the whole term of 12 months or in the case of the Censor of 24 months. The Constitution and the law do not allow for that term to be sub-divided amongst the people who hold that office and separate terms created, and thereby claim that it isn't consecutive. It is consecutive.
 
As to starting again, well we do have a law that requires the election of the Censorial suffectus to happen within a set period of time.
 
Optime vale.
 

 
Sent: Sunday, May 24, 2009 2:28 PM
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] consecutive



  A. Tullia Scholastica M. Lucretio Agricolae quiritibus bonae voluntatis S.P.D.

From the Oxford English Dictionary:

CONSECUTIVE
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65977 From: Publius Ullerius Stephanus Venator Date: 2009-05-24
Subject: US Memorial Day approaches. . .
Avete omnes;

Tomorrow is a holiday known in the US as Memorial Day.

It is a time to reflect upon those who have died in the service of
their country and people.

I'd like to extend that to all those who sacrificed themselves across
the broad swath of our globe in doing that duty, regardless of
reasons, the ultimate sacrifice has the same result.

An older poem of mine.

An Ode to Mars
(1st stanza is repeated as the chorus)

Mars, I greet thee, as a soldier
Mars, I greet thee, as one who served
Took the burden, of my people
Did my duty, as all men should

At Beginning, of all the Worlds
Primal Chaos, had coalesced
In the Order, from this Making
The Gods were formed, in eldest days

Mother Gaia, Father Heaven
Came together, quickened all life
Titans, Furies, Other Daemons
Gods, Men and Beasts, Birds, Fish and Plants
- Chorus -

In the Roman, heart and spirit
Divinities, did become known
Alike and not, to other Gods
Were called by them, by Man Found Names

Mars is one such, Holy Being
Keeper, Warder, and Warrior
Took the Burden, of his God Clan
Did His Duty, and tales were told
- Chorus -

In eldest days, of Latin tribes
Mars became known, as Flock Warder
And the shepherds, in the meadows
Knew His guidance, gave Him their thanks

As Wealth and name, of Rome did grow
And other folk, became aware
Warding broadened, become warlike
Shepherd's long staff, became spear shaft
- Chorus -

As pastures green, were left behind
And Militia, became Legions
Mars marched with men, across the world
With grim purpose, He blessed their arms

And at the heart, of warrior
There lies a truth, embodied by
The life of Mars, His progression
From Flock Warder, to Battle God
- Chorus -
- Chorus -

=====================================
In amicitia et fide
Publius Ullerius Stephanus Venator
Civis circa Quintilis MMDCCLI a.u.c.
Senator et Lictor
Scriba - Aedilican Cohors
Patrician, Paterfamilias
Religio Septentrionalis - Poeta

Dominus Sodalitas Coquuorum et Cerevisiae Coctorum
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Sodalis_Coq_et_Coq/

http://www.myspace.com/venator_poetus
http://anheathenreader.blogspot.com/
http://www.catamount-grange-hearth.org/
http://www.cafepress.com/catamountgrange
--
May the Holy Powers smile on our efforts.
May the Spirits of our family lines nod in approval.
May we be of Worth to our fellow Nova Romans.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65978 From: L Julia Aquila Date: 2009-05-24
Subject: Re: US Memorial Day approaches. . .
Salve, et Salvete,

Splendid poem. Memorial Day was always a solemn holiday for my famiglia and always included an early morning trip to the cemetery and a supper with relatives reminiscing about those they have known and tales of those that have been passed down. Today I am enjoying a quiet day with only the sounds of the birds outside my window and a book in my lap, an anthology of Irish poetry. I would like to share this poem; it is not Roman but it reminds us that those who have transitioned live on through our memories and so we are the keepers of what went before.

How Oft Has the Banshee Cried
By Thomas Moore


HOW oft has the Banshee cried!
How oft has death untied
Bright links that Glory wove,
Sweet bonds entwined by Love!
Peace to each manly soul that sleepeth
Rest to each faithful eye that weepeth;
Long may the fair and brave
Sigh o'er the hero's grave!

We're fallen on evil days!
Star after star decays,
Every bright name that shed
Light o'er the land is fled.
Dark falls the tear of him that mourneth
Lost joy, or hope that ne'er returneth:
But brightly flows the tear
Wept o'er a hero's bier.

Quenched are our beacon lights—
Thou, of the Hundred Fights!
Thou, on whose burning tongue
Truth, peace and freedom hung!
Both mute—but long as valor shineth,
Or mercy's soul at war repineth,
So long shall Erin's pride
Tell how they lived and died.

Vale, et Valete,
Julia




--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Publius Ullerius Stephanus Venator <famila.ulleria.venii@...> wrote:
>
> Avete omnes;
>
> Tomorrow is a holiday known in the US as Memorial Day.
>
> It is a time to reflect upon those who have died in the service of
> their country and people.
>
> I'd like to extend that to all those who sacrificed themselves across
> the broad swath of our globe in doing that duty, regardless of
> reasons, the ultimate sacrifice has the same result.
>
> An older poem of mine.
>
> An Ode to Mars
> (1st stanza is repeated as the chorus)
>
> Mars, I greet thee, as a soldier
> Mars, I greet thee, as one who served
> Took the burden, of my people
> Did my duty, as all men should
>
> At Beginning, of all the Worlds
> Primal Chaos, had coalesced
> In the Order, from this Making
> The Gods were formed, in eldest days
>
> Mother Gaia, Father Heaven
> Came together, quickened all life
> Titans, Furies, Other Daemons
> Gods, Men and Beasts, Birds, Fish and Plants
> - Chorus -
>
> In the Roman, heart and spirit
> Divinities, did become known
> Alike and not, to other Gods
> Were called by them, by Man Found Names
>
> Mars is one such, Holy Being
> Keeper, Warder, and Warrior
> Took the Burden, of his God Clan
> Did His Duty, and tales were told
> - Chorus -
>
> In eldest days, of Latin tribes
> Mars became known, as Flock Warder
> And the shepherds, in the meadows
> Knew His guidance, gave Him their thanks
>
> As Wealth and name, of Rome did grow
> And other folk, became aware
> Warding broadened, become warlike
> Shepherd's long staff, became spear shaft
> - Chorus -
>
> As pastures green, were left behind
> And Militia, became Legions
> Mars marched with men, across the world
> With grim purpose, He blessed their arms
>
> And at the heart, of warrior
> There lies a truth, embodied by
> The life of Mars, His progression
> From Flock Warder, to Battle God
> - Chorus -
> - Chorus -
>
> =====================================
> In amicitia et fide
> Publius Ullerius Stephanus Venator
> Civis circa Quintilis MMDCCLI a.u.c.
> Senator et Lictor
> Scriba - Aedilican Cohors
> Patrician, Paterfamilias
> Religio Septentrionalis - Poeta
>
> Dominus Sodalitas Coquuorum et Cerevisiae Coctorum
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Sodalis_Coq_et_Coq/
>
> http://www.myspace.com/venator_poetus
> http://anheathenreader.blogspot.com/
> http://www.catamount-grange-hearth.org/
> http://www.cafepress.com/catamountgrange
> --
> May the Holy Powers smile on our efforts.
> May the Spirits of our family lines nod in approval.
> May we be of Worth to our fellow Nova Romans.
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65979 From: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com Date: 2009-05-24
Subject: Comitia Centuriata Election, 5/24/2009, 11:00 pm
Reminder from:   Nova-Roma Yahoo! Group
 
Title:   Comitia Centuriata Election
 
Date:   Sunday May 24, 2009
Time:   11:00 pm - 12:00 am
Repeats:   This event repeats every day until Monday May 25, 2009.
Next reminder:   The next reminder for this event will be sent in 13 minutes.
Notes:   The Comitia Centuriata election will follow this schedule:

* 07:00 hrs CET 25 May: Voting by the Centuria Praerogativa alone begins.
* 07:00 hrs CET 27 May: Diribitores capture tally of Centuria Praerogativa.
* 07:00 hrs CET 27 May: Voting by all First Class centuries now permitted.
* 07:00 hrs CET 30 May: Diribitores capture tally of all First Class centuries.
* 07:00 hrs CET 30 May: Voting by all centuries now permitted.
* 17:00 hrs CET 3 June: All voting ends.
 
Copyright © 2009  Yahoo! Inc. All Rights Reserved | Terms of Service | Privacy Policy
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65980 From: C. Maria Caeca Date: 2009-05-24
Subject: Re: US Memorial Day approaches. . .
Salve Julia Aquila, et salvete omnes,

Thank you and Venator for posting those wonderful poems. When I read the
one you posted, Julia Aquila, I was reminded, for some unknown reason, of
Matthew Arnold's Dover Beach. I should do a search to find that, and post
it, although it is extremely easily available to anyone with a decent
anthology of English poetry.

Vale et Valete,
C Maria Caeca
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65981 From: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com Date: 2009-05-24
Subject: Comitia Centuriata Election, 5/24/2009, 11:00 pm
Reminder from:   Nova-Roma Yahoo! Group
 
Title:   Comitia Centuriata Election
 
Date:   Sunday May 24, 2009
Time:   11:00 pm - 12:00 am
Repeats:   This event repeats every day until Monday May 25, 2009.
Notes:   The Comitia Centuriata election will follow this schedule:

* 07:00 hrs CET 25 May: Voting by the Centuria Praerogativa alone begins.
* 07:00 hrs CET 27 May: Diribitores capture tally of Centuria Praerogativa.
* 07:00 hrs CET 27 May: Voting by all First Class centuries now permitted.
* 07:00 hrs CET 30 May: Diribitores capture tally of all First Class centuries.
* 07:00 hrs CET 30 May: Voting by all centuries now permitted.
* 17:00 hrs CET 3 June: All voting ends.
 
Copyright © 2009  Yahoo! Inc. All Rights Reserved | Terms of Service | Privacy Policy
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65982 From: L Julia Aquila Date: 2009-05-24
Subject: Re: NR Floralia updates
Salve Lentule amici!

I sooo wish I was there too! Would be wonderful to meet everyone and to attend the ceremony but I shall look forward to the photos and videos!
Be well and be safe and give everyone my best regards!

Optimé valé in cúrá deorum

Julia


--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Cn. Cornelius Lentulus" <cn_corn_lent@...> wrote:
>
> Cn. Lentulus leg. pr. pr. Quiritibus sal.
>
>
> Just a very quick information, that our guests, A. Apollonius Cordus, C. Petronius Dexter, Sex. Lucilius Tutor and Martina arrived well and we've spent a wonderful afternoon together, visiting historical and famous sites of Budapest, and ending with a dinner.
>
> I must say that talking with Codus in person and listening to his deep thoughts about modern Romanitas and how to approach our most important questions was a wonderful experience, and I've also recieved a wonderful gift from him (a Roman denarius from the republican period, with a Cornelius on it!!). I waited 5 years for this day: to meet my friend!
>
> C. Petronius is a wonderfully nice, polite and humourous person, I highly enjoyed our conversations in Latin with him and Cordus, and I found Petronius a very modest person with a huge knowledge and education. It is gift from Gods to spend this time with Flamen Portunalis Petronius.
>
> Sex. Lucilius Tutor and Matina are just sleeping at my home, very tired of the visiting all the city. They were so warm and nice that I wish to call them my brother and sister. They make me know what the best and most important part of Nova Roma is: friendship without boundaries.
>
> Now, I return to write the coreography texts to the performances, and I prepare to the real Nova Roman ceremony for honouring the 2000th year of Roman presence in Pannonia, and for praying for the future of Nova Roma.
>
> This will be my first public sacrifice as a pontifex, so I will consider it as some kind of ritual investiture to the office. (Your payers are welcome!)
>
> My Roman greetings from Aquincum, in the name Livia, Cordus, Petronius, Tutor and Martina, as well as other Pannonians, Porcius, Vestricius, Lucretia, Popillia, Arrius and everyone! Together with our allied organizations, Nova Roma will be present with at leat 30 people!!
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65983 From: C. Maria Caeca Date: 2009-05-24
Subject: Re: NR Floralia updates
I heartily echo Julia Aquila's good wishes, which will have to suffice,
since I can't (pout) be there.

C. Maria Caeca
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65984 From: L Julia Aquila Date: 2009-05-24
Subject: Re: US Memorial Day approaches. . .
Salve Maria Caeca,

Thank you;) Arnold's Dover Beach, you should post it.

Vale,

Julia

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "C. Maria Caeca" <shoshanahathaway@...> wrote:
>
> Salve Julia Aquila, et salvete omnes,
>
> Thank you and Venator for posting those wonderful poems. When I read the
> one you posted, Julia Aquila, I was reminded, for some unknown reason, of
> Matthew Arnold's Dover Beach. I should do a search to find that, and post
> it, although it is extremely easily available to anyone with a decent
> anthology of English poetry.
>
> Vale et Valete,
> C Maria Caeca
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65985 From: C. Maria Caeca Date: 2009-05-24
Subject: Dover Beach by Matthew Arnold
Salvete Omnes,

This is not, I freely admit, a Latin poem, but it *is* a great piece of
literature, and I think it appropriate for this Holiday.

Therefore, I offer it, with great thanks and enduring and deepest respect to
those who gave, and give their lives to fight the battles so that we will
not have to.

Respectfully,
C. Maria Caeca

"Dover Beach"
The sea is calm to-night.
The tide is full, the moon lies fair
Upon the straits;--on the French coast, the light
Gleams and is gone; the cliffs of England stand,
Glimmering and vast, out in the tranquil bay.
Come to the window, sweet is the night-air!
Only, from the long line of spray
Where the ebb meets the moon-blanch'd sand,
Listen! you hear the grating roar
Of pebbles which the waves suck back, and fling,
At their return, up the high strand,
Begin, and cease, and then again begin,
With tremulous cadence slow, and bring
The eternal note of sadness in.

Sophocles long ago
Heard it on the Ægean, and it brought
Into his mind the turbid ebb and flow
Of human misery; we
Find also in the sound a thought,
Hearing it by this distant northern sea.
The Sea of Faith
Was once, too, at the full, and round earth's shore
Lay like the folds of a bright girdle furl'd.
But now I only hear
Its melancholy, long, withdrawing roar,
Retreating, to the breath
Of the night-wind, down the vast edges drear
And naked shingles of the world.


Ah, love, let us be true
To one another! for the world, which seems
To lie before us like a land of dreams,
So various, so beautiful, so new,
Hath really neither joy, nor love, nor light,
Nor certitude, nor peace, nor help for pain;
And we are here as on a darkling plain
Swept with confused alarms of struggle and flight,
Where ignorant armies clash by night.

By Matthew Arnold (1822-88).
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65986 From: Publius Ullerius Stephanus Venator Date: 2009-05-24
Subject: Re: US Memorial Day approaches. . .
Matthew Arnold - Dover Beach - 1867

The sea is calm to-night.
The tide is full, the moon lies fair
Upon the straits; on the French coast the light
Gleams and is gone; the cliffs of England stand;
Glimmering and vast, out in the tranquil bay.
Come to the window, sweet is the night-air!
Only, from the long line of spray
Where the sea meets the moon-blanched land,
Listen! you hear the grating roar
Of pebbles which the waves draw back, and fling,
At their return, up the high strand,
Begin, and cease, and then again begin,
With tremulous cadence slow, and bring
The eternal note of sadness in.

Sophocles long ago
Heard it on the Aegean, and it brought
Into his mind the turbid ebb and flow
Of human misery; we
Find also in the sound a thought,
Hearing it by this distant northern sea.

The Sea of Faith
Was once, too, at the full, and round earth's shore
Lay like the folds of a bright girdle furled.
But now I only hear
Its melancholy, long, withdrawing roar,
Retreating, to the breath
Of the night-wind, down the vast edges drear
And naked shingles of the world.

Ah, love, let us be true
To one another! for the world, which seems
To lie before us like a land of dreams,
So various, so beautiful, so new,
Hath really neither joy, nor love, nor light,
Nor certitude, nor peace, nor help for pain;
And we are here as on a darkling plain
Swept with confused alarms of struggle and flight,
Where ignorant armies clash by night.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65987 From: Publius Ullerius Stephanus Venator Date: 2009-05-24
Subject: Re: Dover Beach by Matthew Arnold
Ave Caeca;

Looks like we had the same thought at about the same time =)

Gratias tibi ago - Venator
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65988 From: C. Maria Caeca Date: 2009-05-24
Subject: Re: Dover Beach by Matthew Arnold
Salve Venator,

Glad to know that my thoughts weren't wandering *too* far, LOL!

Maria Caeca
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65989 From: Publius Ullerius Stephanus Venator Date: 2009-05-24
Subject: Re: Dover Beach by Matthew Arnold
Ave C Maria =)

On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 7:18 PM, C. Maria Caeca wrote:
>
> Salve Venator,
>
> Glad to know that my thoughts weren't wandering *too* far, LOL!
>
> Maria Caeca
>

Also good to see conversational posts once again!!!

benedicte - Venii
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65990 From: C. Maria Caeca Date: 2009-05-24
Subject: Re: Dover Beach by Matthew Arnold
Salve Venator,

I think that a bit of chat does the community a great deal of good. of
course, you do remember the old proverb about cats and mice, yes?

speak, squeak, scoot!

Vale Bene,

Maria Caeca, safe under her big leaf on that bush beside the column over
yonder, muttering about claws, fangs, bells ...
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65991 From: Roger Date: 2009-05-24
Subject: Idea for New NR Project: Recognition to Solemnize Marriages in Ontar
All,

I have been contemplating a new idea for a NR to consider. Basically, this would be official recognition of the Religio Romana as a denomination in the Canadian Province of Ontario, which would give NR Pontiffs in Ontario the right to solemnize marriages.

There are several things to keep in mind, if NR decides to do this:

1. The entire application process takes about 2 years to complete.

2. We would need at least one Pontiff to reside in Ontario, in order to keep our registration current.

3. We will probably need a worshipping congregation in Ontario, at leats during the application process.

4. We would need consider whether to officiallly incorporate the Collegium Pontificum as a subsidiary corporation to Nova Roma, and also look into whether we need to be incorporated at the Federal or provincial level in Ontario.

Why Ontario? First, it is one of those jurisdictions in which clergy must be officially granted recognition in order to solemnize marriage (unlike Michigan, where I live). Second, Ontario now officially has authorized same-sex marriage, so if we are granted recognition there, and the RR decides to perform same-sex marriages (I don't know if they have), they will be perfectly valid and legal marriages. Third, unlike many other jurisdictions, Ontario has no requirement that either of the contracting parties be residents in Ontario.

If we can get this official recognition in Ontario, then we can attract people who want to use a Religio Romana ceremony for their marriage to be married there. My guess is that some would also decide to stay there permanently, thus contributing to growth in Province Canada Citerior and to NR as a whole.

If we decide to do this, the following are the supporting documentation that we will have to supply to the Registrar General:

1. Appointment and Dismissal of Clergy: Please supply us with the by-laws or rules of your denomination, which clearly sets out how your clergy members are appointed and dismissed.

2. A copy of your denomination's rites and usages respecting solemnization of marriage. An actual copy of your marriage ceremony is required.

3. A copy of the form of worship, namely actions or practices of displaying reverence or veneration paid to a being or power regarded as supernatural or divine displayed by appropriate acts, rites and ceremonies.

4. A registration package for each clergy is required to include:

(i) a completed application;
(ii) a copy of your ordination or proof of appointment;
(iii) a letter of authorization from the governing official of your denomination permitting you to solemnize marriages according to that denomination's rights and usages.

5. A letter signed by three board members stating who will be the governing official for the denomination. The governing official will be responsible for keeping the records of all clergy registered under the denomination and report to the Registrar General any changes in status or addresses of clergy registered under their denomination.

6. A certified copy of the incorporation papers for your denomination is required. This will reflect the date and place of incorporation or founding of your religious body. A copy of your registration as a charity with Revenue Canada is also required.

7. A statement is required which reflects information about the congregation you will be serving. Please show the name and location of the church, and the number of members and adherents showing the extent and continuous growth. Include evidence that would indicate the length of time the denomination has been functioning inside or outside of Ontario.

8. A statement showing the organizational structure of your denomination explaining the procedure by which your governing official would be appointed or relieved of jurisdictional authority.

9. Signatures and addresses of at least 25 members of the denomination, excluding clergy and their families, petitioning us to register the denomination.

I am willing to be the point man on this project, if we decide to go ahead with it. There is no cost for the application itself, though there may well be other costs that would be incurred in the process, for example, if incorporation is necessary in Canada, or whatever the filing fees for Revenue Caanda (the Canadian IRS) would be.

And I reiterate that for this to work, we will need at least one pontifex in Ontario, otherwise any other work that goes into this will be useless.

I am also willing to entertain trying this is any other State or Province that would allow us to officially register the RR as a denomination.

What do you think?

Lucius Quintius Constantius
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65992 From: Maior Date: 2009-05-24
Subject: Re: Some are trying to set up a one candidate race
M. Hortensia G. Iulio Caesari spd;
Caesar as someone who has gone to law school let me explain to you:
when you say 'cannot legally serve' you are simply stating one person, Gn. Iulius Caesar's opinion. All laws have varying interpretations, which is why nations have High Courts and Supreme Courts.

So kindly stop, we all get your point. Simply repeating it won't make people more inclined to believe you.

The consuls, praetors and tribunes construed the law and all certified the candidates. They are the ones charged with the responsability.

I appreciate differing opinions, but after a while it can look like bullying. The issue has been decided; you didn't object within the 3 day period. Now accept it and move on.
let's have the election and let the people decide;
now that is Roman
bene vale in pacem deorum
Marca Hortensia Maior





>
> I am well used to standing up for holding to the Constitution and the law, regardless of popularity issues.
>
> What I want or don't want is not the issue. The issue is the Constitution provides the definition of "office of censor". What follows from that can be ignored, the Constitution can be ignored, the can be law ignored, and the consequences of electing someone who cannot legally serve can be ignored too. None of that makes it right or prudent to do so. None of that makes the consequences go away.
>
> Ultimately as the Consuls are running the election it is what they want. If I wanted a fifty canddiate race or a one candidate race, it wouldn't be the issue. The issue is what the constitution and law clearly says, and it says Modianus cannot serve as Censor.
>
> If you dispute that, provide me with a credible alternative to the definition of office of censor as provided in the Constitution and show why that definition doesn't apply to the Lex Cornelia Iunia de definitione intervallorum magistratuum and how Section 1.B of the Constitution doesn't apply. If you or others cannot, then the law and constitution are clear, he cannot serve as Censor.
>
> There are people today who believe the earth is flat despite having the evidence to the contrary pointed out, or those creationists who dismiss fossil evidence and insist the earth is only thousands of years old. I have given the evidence that shows Modianus even if elected, cannot serve and people are ignoring it. That doesn't invalidate the facts and words of the Constitution.
>
> Optime valete
>
>
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Christer Edling <christer.edling@> wrote:
> >
> > Salve Senator!
> >
> > That You stand for your _opinion_ just make me respect You more, but
> > when some argue the same as You do they, including Cato himself, also
> > want Cato to be the only candidate. This is what worries me.
> >
> > If You want a "one candidate race" my respect for You sadly will
> > diminish, but still this is not the only position on which I will base
> > my impression of You.
> >
> >
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65993 From: Gnaeus Iulius Caesar Date: 2009-05-24
Subject: Re: Some are trying to set up a one candidate race
Caesar Maori SPD.
 
Certification doesn't imply infallibility. I note you didn't counter the definition of office of the censor in the Constitution or the effect that now has on the use of consecutive in the lex. In fact all you did was tell me what someone else said about the issue.
 
Optime vale. 

From: Maior
Sent: Sunday, May 24, 2009 7:40 PM
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Some are trying to set up a one candidate race

M. Hortensia G. Iulio Caesari spd;
    Caesar as someone who has gone to law school let me explain to you:   
 when you say 'cannot legally serve' you are simply stating one person, Gn. Iulius Caesar's opinion. All laws have varying interpretations, which is why nations have High Courts and Supreme Courts.

 So  kindly stop, we all get your point. Simply repeating it won't make people  more inclined to believe you.

The consuls, praetors and tribunes construed the law and all certified the candidates. They are the ones charged with the responsability.

I appreciate differing opinions, but after a while it can look like bullying. The issue has been decided; you didn't object within the 3 day period. Now accept it and move on.
      let's have the election and let the people decide;
          now that is Roman
                      bene vale in pacem deorum
                     Marca Hortensia Maior
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65994 From: Vaughn Date: 2009-05-24
Subject: Re: Idea for New NR Project: Recognition to Solemnize Marriages in O
Salve,
I think this is an amazing idea and if the process does take two years we should get on it right away.
However there are a few things that we as a group would have to settle out.
For instance, the diffrent types of weddings.
Confarreatio, Coemptio, Usus, and Free Marriage.
Which ones would we use and if we decided to use them all then would the same ancient laws apply? Would we allow only patricians to marry under Confarreatio?
These are the only things I see that could possibly hinder and those things could be fixed with a vote.
Other then that, marvelous idea.:)
Di Vos Incolumes Custodiant.
RGIN
GAIVS IVNIVS NERO.




--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Roger" <politicog@...> wrote:
>
> All,
>
> I have been contemplating a new idea for a NR to consider. Basically, this would be official recognition of the Religio Romana as a denomination in the Canadian Province of Ontario, which would give NR Pontiffs in Ontario the right to solemnize marriages.
>
> There are several things to keep in mind, if NR decides to do this:
>
> 1. The entire application process takes about 2 years to complete.
>
> 2. We would need at least one Pontiff to reside in Ontario, in order to keep our registration current.
>
> 3. We will probably need a worshipping congregation in Ontario, at leats during the application process.
>
> 4. We would need consider whether to officiallly incorporate the Collegium Pontificum as a subsidiary corporation to Nova Roma, and also look into whether we need to be incorporated at the Federal or provincial level in Ontario.
>
> Why Ontario? First, it is one of those jurisdictions in which clergy must be officially granted recognition in order to solemnize marriage (unlike Michigan, where I live). Second, Ontario now officially has authorized same-sex marriage, so if we are granted recognition there, and the RR decides to perform same-sex marriages (I don't know if they have), they will be perfectly valid and legal marriages. Third, unlike many other jurisdictions, Ontario has no requirement that either of the contracting parties be residents in Ontario.
>
> If we can get this official recognition in Ontario, then we can attract people who want to use a Religio Romana ceremony for their marriage to be married there. My guess is that some would also decide to stay there permanently, thus contributing to growth in Province Canada Citerior and to NR as a whole.
>
> If we decide to do this, the following are the supporting documentation that we will have to supply to the Registrar General:
>
> 1. Appointment and Dismissal of Clergy: Please supply us with the by-laws or rules of your denomination, which clearly sets out how your clergy members are appointed and dismissed.
>
> 2. A copy of your denomination's rites and usages respecting solemnization of marriage. An actual copy of your marriage ceremony is required.
>
> 3. A copy of the form of worship, namely actions or practices of displaying reverence or veneration paid to a being or power regarded as supernatural or divine displayed by appropriate acts, rites and ceremonies.
>
> 4. A registration package for each clergy is required to include:
>
> (i) a completed application;
> (ii) a copy of your ordination or proof of appointment;
> (iii) a letter of authorization from the governing official of your denomination permitting you to solemnize marriages according to that denomination's rights and usages.
>
> 5. A letter signed by three board members stating who will be the governing official for the denomination. The governing official will be responsible for keeping the records of all clergy registered under the denomination and report to the Registrar General any changes in status or addresses of clergy registered under their denomination.
>
> 6. A certified copy of the incorporation papers for your denomination is required. This will reflect the date and place of incorporation or founding of your religious body. A copy of your registration as a charity with Revenue Canada is also required.
>
> 7. A statement is required which reflects information about the congregation you will be serving. Please show the name and location of the church, and the number of members and adherents showing the extent and continuous growth. Include evidence that would indicate the length of time the denomination has been functioning inside or outside of Ontario.
>
> 8. A statement showing the organizational structure of your denomination explaining the procedure by which your governing official would be appointed or relieved of jurisdictional authority.
>
> 9. Signatures and addresses of at least 25 members of the denomination, excluding clergy and their families, petitioning us to register the denomination.
>
> I am willing to be the point man on this project, if we decide to go ahead with it. There is no cost for the application itself, though there may well be other costs that would be incurred in the process, for example, if incorporation is necessary in Canada, or whatever the filing fees for Revenue Caanda (the Canadian IRS) would be.
>
> And I reiterate that for this to work, we will need at least one pontifex in Ontario, otherwise any other work that goes into this will be useless.
>
> I am also willing to entertain trying this is any other State or Province that would allow us to officially register the RR as a denomination.
>
> What do you think?
>
> Lucius Quintius Constantius
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65995 From: Maior Date: 2009-05-25
Subject: Re: Some are trying to set up a one candidate race
Maior Caesari spd;
that's the point, the issue has been ajudicated. That you don't care for the interpretation means nothing legally.

The people elected the magistrates, they acted and analysed, the people had an opportunity to object.

As for 'infallibility.' No lawyer would ever use such a term. It doesn't exist in Republican Roman law nor Modern public law. It exists in Roman Catholic theology, which you are confusing with Roman law.
bene vale
Marca Hortensia Maior


>
> Caesar Maori SPD.
>
> Certification doesn't imply infallibility. I note you didn't counter the definition of office of the censor in the Constitution or the effect that now has on the use of consecutive in the lex. In fact all you did was tell me what someone else said about the issue.
>
> Optime vale.
>
>
> From: Maior
> Sent: Sunday, May 24, 2009 7:40 PM
> To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Some are trying to set up a one candidate race
>
>
> M. Hortensia G. Iulio Caesari spd;
> Caesar as someone who has gone to law school let me explain to you:
> when you say 'cannot legally serve' you are simply stating one person, Gn. Iulius Caesar's opinion. All laws have varying interpretations, which is why nations have High Courts and Supreme Courts.
>
> So kindly stop, we all get your point. Simply repeating it won't make people more inclined to believe you.
>
> The consuls, praetors and tribunes construed the law and all certified the candidates. They are the ones charged with the responsability.
>
> I appreciate differing opinions, but after a while it can look like bullying. The issue has been decided; you didn't object within the 3 day period. Now accept it and move on.
> let's have the election and let the people decide;
> now that is Roman
> bene vale in pacem deorum
> Marca Hortensia Maior
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65996 From: Gnaeus Iulius Caesar Date: 2009-05-25
Subject: Re: Some are trying to set up a one candidate race
Caesar Maiori SPD
 
Of course it means nothing legally Maior anymore than it does concerning the "adjudication", for the Constitution trumps all. As for the opportunity to object, that too is irrelevant in the face of the words of the Constitution. That doesn't become invalid or null just because someone didn't object at some specified or preferred time. As for infallibility, I know full well that it doesn't exist in any Roman or modern law, only in Nova Roma when people stick a bag on their heads and wish away the Constitution and the law, and say things like "that's the point, the issue has been ajudicated. That you don't care for the interpretation means nothing legally".
 
Optime vale

From: Maior
Sent: Sunday, May 24, 2009 10:13 PM
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Some are trying to set up a one candidate race

Maior Caesari spd;
 that's the point, the issue has been ajudicated. That you don't care for the interpretation means nothing legally.

The people elected the magistrates, they acted and analysed, the people had an opportunity to object.

As for 'infallibility.' No lawyer would ever use such a term. It doesn't exist in Republican Roman law nor Modern public law. It exists in Roman Catholic theology, which you are confusing with Roman law.
                       bene vale
                      Marca Hortensia Maior
            

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65997 From: MCC Date: 2009-05-25
Subject: COMITIA CENTURIATA: Election for Censor
M. Curiatius Complutensis Consul omnes civibus Novae Romae SPD

The Cista for the election of Censor Suffectus is open.

The schedule of the election is:

  • 07:00 hrs CET 25 May: Voting by the Centuria Praerogativa alone begins.
  • 07:00 hrs CET 27 May: Diribitores capture tally of Centuria Praerogativa.
  • 07:00 hrs CET 27 May: Voting by all First Class centuries now permitted.
  • 07:00 hrs CET 30 May: Diribitores capture tally of all First Class centuries.
  • 07:00 hrs CET 30 May: Voting by all centuries now permitted.
  • 17:00 hrs CET 3 June: All voting ends.
The Centuria XIV is the Centuria Praerogativa.

For more information on this election go to http://www.novaroma.org/nr/Election_Maius_MMDCCLXII_(Nova_Roma)

To vote go to the Cista at http://www.novaroma.org/civitas/vote

Valete

M. Curiatius Complutensis
Consul

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65998 From: Maior Date: 2009-05-25
Subject: Re: Some are trying to set up a one candidate race
Salve Caesari;
lol...I think you mean Gn. Iulius Caesar's interpretation of the Constitution trumps all!

And that is the point. It is only your opinion and you are entitled to it but it is only an opinion not the truth.
bene vale in pacem deorum
Marca Hortensia Maior

>
> , for the Constitution trumps all. As for the opportunity to object, that too is irrelevant in the face of the words of the Constitution. That doesn't become invalid or null just because someone didn't object at some specified or preferred time. As for infallibility, I know full well that it doesn't exist in any Roman or modern law, only in Nova Roma when people stick a bag on their heads and wish away the Constitution and the law, and say things like "that's the point, the issue has been ajudicated. That you don't care for the interpretation means nothing legally".
>
> Optime vale
>
>
> From: Maior
> Sent: Sunday, May 24, 2009 10:13 PM
> To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Some are trying to set up a one candidate race
>
>
> Maior Caesari spd;
> that's the point, the issue has been ajudicated. That you don't care for the interpretation means nothing legally.
>
> The people elected the magistrates, they acted and analysed, the people had an opportunity to object.
>
> As for 'infallibility.' No lawyer would ever use such a term. It doesn't exist in Republican Roman law nor Modern public law. It exists in Roman Catholic theology, which you are confusing with Roman law.
> bene vale
> Marca Hortensia Maior
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 65999 From: Gnaeus Iulius Caesar Date: 2009-05-25
Subject: Re: Some are trying to set up a one candidate race
Caesar Maori SPD
 
You have yet to provide me yours :>
 
Optime vale

From: Maior
Sent: Monday, May 25, 2009 12:15 AM
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Some are trying to set up a one candidate race

Salve Caesari;
  lol...I think you mean Gn. Iulius Caesar's interpretation of the Constitution trumps all!

And that is the point. It is only your opinion and you are entitled to it but it is only an opinion not the truth.
                      bene vale in pacem deorum
                       Marca Hortensia Maior

>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66000 From: MCC Date: 2009-05-25
Subject: Re: COMITIA CENTURIATA: Election for Censor
Salvete

Only a memento

-today and tomorrow only are allowed to vote the members of the Centuria Praerogativa (Centuria XIV)
-from 27 to 29 May only are allowed to vote the members of the First Class centuries (Centuries I to XIV)
-from 30 May to 3 June are allowed to vote the members of all centuries.

Please check your own centuria in your profile in the Album Civium (http://www.novaroma.org/civitas/album)

If you have any doubt about the procedures do not hesitate to ask.

Valete

M.Curiatius Complutensis
Consul

MCC escribió:
M. Curiatius Complutensis Consul omnes civibus Novae Romae SPD

The Cista for the election of Censor Suffectus is open.

The schedule of the election is:

  • 07:00 hrs CET 25 May: Voting by the Centuria Praerogativa alone begins.
  • 07:00 hrs CET 27 May: Diribitores capture tally of Centuria Praerogativa.
  • 07:00 hrs CET 27 May: Voting by all First Class centuries now permitted.
  • 07:00 hrs CET 30 May: Diribitores capture tally of all First Class centuries.
  • 07:00 hrs CET 30 May: Voting by all centuries now permitted.
  • 17:00 hrs CET 3 June: All voting ends.
The Centuria XIV is the Centuria Praerogativa.

For more information on this election go to http://www.novaroma.org/nr/Election_Maius_MMDCCLXII_(Nova_Roma)

To vote go to the Cista at http://www.novaroma.org/civitas/vote

Valete

M. Curiatius Complutensis
Consul

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66001 From: QFabiusMaxmi@aol.com Date: 2009-05-25
Subject: Re: MY SUPPORT FOR K. FABIUS BUTEO MODIANUS
In a message dated 5/24/2009 10:15:52 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time, fabiadrusilla@... writes:
I have decided to vote K. Fabius Buteo Modianus because I'm tired of reading messages from Equitius Cato saying: I am right, the truth is mine, everything is done in Nova Roma is illegal, I am going to complain you.  (I'm also tired of reading messages from Cornelius Sulla and others with the same arguments)
 
Please citizens, vote to K. Fabius Buteo Modianus for Censor. He has proven to be the best choice for this office.
No he's not.  His term would be illegal.   Now go to your room!
 
Q. Fabius Maximus
Paterfamilius
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66002 From: fabiadrusilla Date: 2009-05-25
Subject: Re: MY SUPPORT FOR K. FABIUS BUTEO MODIANUS
--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, QFabiusMaxmi@... wrote:
>
>
> No he's not. His term would be illegal. Now go to your room!
>
> Q. Fabius Maximus
> Paterfamilius
>

Why should I go to my room? Go you! What? Just men can say in this list?

Is this what Nova Roman women can expect if we allow Equitius Cato is elected?


Fabio Maximo, really your message is a sexist insult.

Vale

Quinta Fabia Drusilla
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66003 From: David Kling Date: 2009-05-25
Subject: Re: MY SUPPORT FOR K. FABIUS BUTEO MODIANUS
Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus Quintae Fabiae Drusillae salutem dicit

I too am now a Fabia and Quintus Fabius Maximus is NOT my pater familias.  He is not your pater familias either, and his insinuation that he is acknowledges he has no understanding of the gens reform of several years ago.

Again I appreciate your support.

Vale;

Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus

On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 3:36 AM, fabiadrusilla <fabiadrusilla@...> wrote:


--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, QFabiusMaxmi@... wrote:
>
>
> No he's not. His term would be illegal. Now go to your room!
>
> Q. Fabius Maximus
> Paterfamilius
>

Why should I go to my room? Go you! What? Just men can say in this list?

Is this what Nova Roman women can expect if we allow Equitius Cato is elected?

Fabio Maximo, really your message is a sexist insult.

Vale

Quinta Fabia Drusilla



Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66004 From: A. Sempronius Regulus Date: 2009-05-25
Subject: Re: our untapped resource
There were separate baths and some co-ed one of my books claims. The baths were actually like our modern shopping malls -- besides baths, they art shops, art galleries, cafes, and something you would not find in our malls -- rooms for sex. I find it a deep
source of bemused irony that the basilica, which was the type of bulding these baths-malls-and sex rooms were housed, became the model of the Christian church because they did not want to "contaminate" their buidings by modelling them after a Roman temple.

--- On Sun, 5/24/09, L Julia Aquila <dis_pensible@...> wrote:

From: L Julia Aquila <dis_pensible@...>
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: our untapped resource
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Date: Sunday, May 24, 2009, 7:05 PM

Iulia Mariae Semproni S.P.D.

Sounds good to me also.
But allow me to play the devil's advocate here, something I nevvverrrr do, *laugh* and ask a question.
This is not going to be historically accurate so it would be a co-ed Roman bath, correct? This I might attend from time to time;)

Valete,
Julia

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com, "A. Sempronius Regulus" <asempronius. regulus@. ..> wrote:
>
> Sigh! Why couldn't it be a Roman Bath?
>
> --- On Sat, 5/23/09, L Julia Aquila <dis_pensible@ ...> wrote:
>
>
> From: L Julia Aquila <dis_pensible@ ...>
> Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: our untapped resource
> To: Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com
> Date: Saturday, May 23, 2009, 6:37 PM
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Salve Mariae,
>
> Thank you for this information.
>
> Vale optime,
> Julia
>


Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66005 From: A. Sempronius Regulus Date: 2009-05-25
Subject: Re: our untapped resource
There are Roman mosaics or paintings where women are dressed in swimming and gymn attire. It looks exactly like a bikini. The picture I have in mind has two women dressed in these black bikini things tossing what loooks like a medicine ball. There is other exercise equipment stuff around. Off to one corner, another woman in the same black bikini thing is seating with her legs in a pool-bath?
 
At one point, I was actually going to look up whether this Roman "bikini" was actually the ancestor to the modern bikini. But I never got around to it.

 

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66006 From: A. Sempronius Regulus Date: 2009-05-25
Subject: Re: our untapped resource
Well, what do you know! And leather too! The bikini is a Graco-Roman invention.
 
 
 
 
There was another link but it was kind of gross. It Troy Donohue painted in gold and posing as Sol Invictus.
 
--- On Mon, 5/25/09, A. Sempronius Regulus <asempronius.regulus@...> wrote:

From: A. Sempronius Regulus <asempronius.regulus@...>
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: our untapped resource
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Date: Monday, May 25, 2009, 1:29 PM

There are Roman mosaics or paintings where women are dressed in swimming and gymn attire. It looks exactly like a bikini. The picture I have in mind has two women dressed in these black bikini things tossing what loooks like a medicine ball. There is other exercise equipment stuff around. Off to one corner, another woman in the same black bikini thing is seating with her legs in a pool-bath?
 
At one point, I was actually going to look up whether this Roman "bikini" was actually the ancestor to the modern bikini. But I never got around to it.

 


Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66007 From: livia_plauta Date: 2009-05-25
Subject: Re: Help with trip to Rome
Salve Cicurina,
as Julia Aquila suggested, you should contact NR citizens in Rome and Italy. I'm not able to help you concretely (unless you want to rent an apartment, because I have a contact), but the person who can help you most is C. Aurelius Vindex. As a hotel owner he has the most experience in the field, he has a lot of contacts in the tourist industry, and apparently from November this year he is going to run a B&B in Rome itself.

I'm sure he would be able to find accomodation and guides for you, and he will probably obtain much better prices than you could get on your own.

As for the tour program, it depends very much on how you want to travel. If you are going to organize everything on your own, and rely on public transport, I suggest you don't try to squeeze more than two cities into the two weeks you have, otherwise your experience will be more about time spent in search for information, on trains and buses or waiting for them (and pain in your feet), than about time spent seeing the actual sights.

If the focus is on ancient Rome only, then I suggest Rome, Ostia antica (near Rome), then staying a few days in Naples and visiting Herculaneum, Poppeia's villa at Oplontis (short visit - great experience), and maybe dedicate two days to Pompeii (you can visit in one day, but it requires athletic fitness).

If you think this is a once in a lifetime chance and you will never go back to Italy, and you would like the "five cities in ten days" -type tour, then your best option is a package tour, however uncool it may seem.

Experienced travel agencies will cut down the "dead" times in a trip in a manner which is impossible to do for the individual traveller, and by providing bus transport will also cut down on the amount of walking you have to do.
I'm sure there must be some agency offering the kind of tour you are interested in.

Either way, don't make the same mistake I did and leave without doing at least some physical training first (hiking or walking).
In April I went to Naples, after not doing any sports for at least one year, and after five days of hard walking my legs were so sore that I had to put in two days of almost total rest. And I had brought along a cream for soothing sore muscles, but even that couldn't work miracles.

If you need further advice please feel free to contact me privately. If you contact Vindex please try to keep your sentences simple because his English isn't good.

Optime vale,
Livia


>
> Salve cousin!
>
> May I suggest that you write to Gaius Aurelius Vindex, L. Livia Plauta and Fr. Apulus Caesar. You can contact them through the Album Civium on the Nova Roma website.
> They have a mailing list but it is not yahoo and most of it is in Italian: http://italia.novaroma.org
> Hope this helps and enjoy your trip to Italy!
>
> Optime vale,
> L. Iulia Aquila
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Sondra Jacobs <simchajacobs@> wrote:
> >
> > Salvete Omnes,
> >  
> > I'm resending this e-mail under a different subject.  I only got two responses and I think it might be because I had it under the wrong heading.  Thanks.
> >  
> > Cicurina
> >
> > --- On Thu, 5/21/09, Sondra Jacobs <simchajacobs@> wrote:
> >
> >
> > From: Sondra Jacobs <simchajacobs@>
> > Subject: Anything but politics
> > To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> > Date: Thursday, May 21, 2009, 7:30 AM
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Salvete Omnes,
> >  
> > I just finished reading the article by Caseo Fabius Bueteo Quintilianus called "The Serouisness of Our Res Publica - We need to have a Base in Rome" and I agree 100 percent in RTQ.   
> >  
> > On that end, I am planning to visit Rome this coming March (in 2010)  I probably will only go there once in my lifetime and would like some information about what tour companies to use (in English) and what to definately see when there.  My brother and I are going for about 2 weeks.  (but we will be wanting to see other places in Italy, like Pompeii.  We want to concentrate on ancient Rome, not modern.  We want to feel what you were talking about in the article, to experience the glory of Ancient Rome!
> >  
> > We are planning to just go stay at a hotel and book tours there (in English), but we've never done this before.  Do you have any ideas that will help?  About what sights to see in the City and also in other parts of Italy.  Also, any websites to visit to book tours and location of the hotels that would be most convenient to touring. 
> >  
> > I am so excited to have Rome actually become part of my life!  I am taking Teaching Company courses and reading (and listing on tape) to as much information as I can get my hands on. 
> >  
> > Thank you so much for your help in this matter.
> >  
> > Valete,
> >  
> > Gaia Iulia Cicurina
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66008 From: livia_plauta Date: 2009-05-25
Subject: Re: Help with trip to Rome
I forgot to mention that the link Julia Aquila gave is to the italian NR website, not to the mailing list, which is
http://it.groups.yahoo.com/group/pomerium/

Most people write in Italian, but the official languages are also English and Latin.



>
> Salve cousin!
>
> May I suggest that you write to Gaius Aurelius Vindex, L. Livia Plauta and Fr. Apulus Caesar. You can contact them through the Album Civium on the Nova Roma website.
> They have a mailing list but it is not yahoo and most of it is in Italian: http://italia.novaroma.org
> Hope this helps and enjoy your trip to Italy!
>
> Optime vale,
> L. Iulia Aquila
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Sondra Jacobs <simchajacobs@> wrote:
> >
> > Salvete Omnes,
> >  
> > I'm resending this e-mail under a different subject.  I only got two responses and I think it might be because I had it under the wrong heading.  Thanks.
> >  
> > Cicurina
> >
> > --- On Thu, 5/21/09, Sondra Jacobs <simchajacobs@> wrote:
> >
> >
> > From: Sondra Jacobs <simchajacobs@>
> > Subject: Anything but politics
> > To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> > Date: Thursday, May 21, 2009, 7:30 AM
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Salvete Omnes,
> >  
> > I just finished reading the article by Caseo Fabius Bueteo Quintilianus called "The Serouisness of Our Res Publica - We need to have a Base in Rome" and I agree 100 percent in RTQ.   
> >  
> > On that end, I am planning to visit Rome this coming March (in 2010)  I probably will only go there once in my lifetime and would like some information about what tour companies to use (in English) and what to definately see when there.  My brother and I are going for about 2 weeks.  (but we will be wanting to see other places in Italy, like Pompeii.  We want to concentrate on ancient Rome, not modern.  We want to feel what you were talking about in the article, to experience the glory of Ancient Rome!
> >  
> > We are planning to just go stay at a hotel and book tours there (in English), but we've never done this before.  Do you have any ideas that will help?  About what sights to see in the City and also in other parts of Italy.  Also, any websites to visit to book tours and location of the hotels that would be most convenient to touring. 
> >  
> > I am so excited to have Rome actually become part of my life!  I am taking Teaching Company courses and reading (and listing on tape) to as much information as I can get my hands on. 
> >  
> > Thank you so much for your help in this matter.
> >  
> > Valete,
> >  
> > Gaia Iulia Cicurina
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66009 From: L Julia Aquila Date: 2009-05-25
Subject: Re: our untapped resource
Salve Semproni,

I believe the Bikini originated in Greece around 1000BCE for sporting events but the photo you are referring to may be this one:
http://www.internationalliving.com/Countries/Italy/Country-Archive/09-15-05
I remember an interesting discussion regarding that a while ago on the ML.
Anyway I do not think I would want to wear leather bikini;)

Vale
Julia

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "A. Sempronius Regulus" <asempronius.regulus@...> wrote:
>
> There are Roman mosaics or paintings where women are dressed in swimming and gymn attire. It looks exactly like a bikini. The picture I have in mind has two women dressed in these black bikini things tossing what loooks like a medicine ball. There is other exercise equipment stuff around. Off to one corner, another woman in the same black bikini thing is seating with her legs in a pool-bath?
>  
> At one point, I was actually going to look up whether this Roman "bikini" was actually the ancestor to the modern bikini. But I never got around to it..
>
>
>
>
>  
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66010 From: L Julia Aquila Date: 2009-05-25
Subject: Re: our untapped resource
And there you go! I should have read all the emails before responding!
;)
Vale~

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "A. Sempronius Regulus" <asempronius.regulus@...> wrote:
>
> Well, what do you know! And leather too! The bikini is a Graco-Roman invention.
>  
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bikini
>  
>
> http://www.internationalliving.com/Countries/Italy/Country-Archive/09-15-05
>  
>
> http://www.galenfrysinger.com/bakini_girl_mosaics_sicily.htm
>  
> There was another link but it was kind of gross. It Troy Donohue painted in gold and posing as Sol Invictus.
>  
> --- On Mon, 5/25/09, A. Sempronius Regulus <asempronius.regulus@...> wrote:
>
>
> From: A. Sempronius Regulus <asempronius.regulus@...>
> Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: our untapped resource
> To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> Date: Monday, May 25, 2009, 1:29 PM
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> There are Roman mosaics or paintings where women are dressed in swimming and gymn attire. It looks exactly like a bikini. The picture I have in mind has two women dressed in these black bikini things tossing what loooks like a medicine ball. There is other exercise equipment stuff around. Off to one corner, another woman in the same black bikini thing is seating with her legs in a pool-bath?
>  
> At one point, I was actually going to look up whether this Roman "bikini" was actually the ancestor to the modern bikini. But I never got around to it.
>
>
>
>
>  
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66011 From: livia_plauta Date: 2009-05-25
Subject: A dream come true
I posted this in the Latinitas list, but then I realized that I'd better post it here too, because at least one good friend of mine is still banned from that list.
More reports about Floralia are forthcoming.

L. Livia Plauta omnibus sodalibus S.P:D.

Over the weekend, as we announced on many lists already, we Novi Romani from Pannonia had a big role in the Floralia festival at the Aquincum Museum here in Budapest.
We held a big sacrifice to various gods in honour of the two-thousandth anniversary of the creation of Pannonia, we held a roman fashion show, we demonstrated how a roman marriage by confarreatio and a trial took place.

We had guests from three countries: Sex. Lucilius Tutor and his girlfriend from the Czech Republic, A. Apollonius Cordus from London, and C. Petronius Dexter from Paris.

The good news is that four of us: A. Apollonius Cordus, C. Petronius Dexter, Cn. Cornelius Lentulus and myself were able to speak Latin for hours on end, at the festival location, at the restaurant, and at my place.
I knew the three men I mentioned are all excellent latinists, and I had no doubt they could speak Latin fluently, but the biggest surprise for me came from myself. I didn't consider myself latine loquens, so I was quite surprised when I found myself speaking Latin, with mistakes, of course, and having to ask help for words or phrases, but for hours, and on every sort of topic.
I think the biggest merit goes to Cordus, who is so dedicated to living latin that he answers in latin even when addressed in English.

Anyway one of my biggest dreams came true this weekend, the dream of being able to learn Latin the way living languages are usually learned, by interaction with a community of speakers, by trial and error, in connection with everyday situations.

This demonstrates that the goals Avitus and Scholastica pursue, of having a community that speaks Latin naturally, as a means of communication, is actually reachable in reality and within Nova Roma.

All of us (the four people mentioned above) made a vow to meet again as soon as possible in the future and continue speaking Latin, as we had such a wonderful time together.

I now have to consider myself latine loquens, but unfortunately I'm not latine scribens yet.
That's why I'm writing this here and not to the Nova Roma latina mailing list.
I realized I'm much more shy in writing, and I don't dare see my mistakes in black on white, so for the moment the situation with my Latin is similar to that of my French: I can talk but not write.
So far, my spoken French is still way better than my Latin, but I hope that will change soon.

Optime valete,
Livia
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66012 From: L Julia Aquila Date: 2009-05-25
Subject: Re: Classic Poetry, Prose, Proems
Salvete omnes,

For this hours selection I offer from Petronius:
THE SATYRICON
Petronius CH 1
[II ] Under such a training it is no more possible to acquire good taste than it is not to stink, if you live in a kitchen. Give me leave to tell you that you rhetoricians are chiefly to blame for the ruin of Oratory, for with your silly, idle phrases, meant only to tickle the ears of an audience, you have enervated and deboshed the very substance of true eloquence.
Young men were not bound down to declamations in the days when Sophocles and Euripides found the very words they wanted to best express their meaning. No cloistered professor had as yet darkened men's intellects, when Pindar and the nine Lyric bards shrank from emulating the Homeric note. And not to cite poets exclusively,--I cannot see that either Plato or Demosthenes ever practised this sort of mental exercise. A noble, and so to say chaste, style is not overloaded with ornament, not turgid; its own natural beauty gives it elevation.
Then after a while this windy, extravagant deluge of words invaded Athens from Asia, and like a malignant star, blasting the minds of young men aiming at lofty ideals, instantly broke up all rules of art and struck eloquence dumb. Since that day who has reached the perfection of Thucydides, the glory of Hyperides? Nay! not a poem has been written of bright and wholesome complexion; but all, as if fed on the same unhealthy diet, have lacked stamina to attain old age. Painting moreover shared the same fate, after Egypt presumptuously invented a compendious method for that noble Art.

[II] "Qui inter haec nutriuntur, non magis sapere possunt quam bene olere qui in culina habitant. Pace vestra liceat dixisse, primi omnium eloquentiam perdidistis. Levibus enim atque inanibus sonis ludibria quaedam excitando, effecistis ut corpus orationis enervaretur et caderet. Nondum iuvenes declamationibus continebantur, cum Sophocles aut Euripides invenerunt verba quibus deberent loqui. Nondum umbraticus doctor ingenia deleverat, cum Pindarus novemque lyrici Homericis versibus canere timuerunt. Et ne poetas quidem ad testimonium citem, certe neque Platona neque Demosthenen ad hoc genus exercitationis accessisse video. Grandis et, ut ita dicam, pudica oratio non est maculosa nec turgida, sed naturali pulchritudine exsurgit. Nuper ventosa istaec et enormis loquacitas Athenas ex Asia commigravit animosque iuvenum ad magna surgentes veluti pestilenti quodam sidere adflavit, semelque corrupta regula eloquentia stetit et obmutuit. Ad summam, quis postea Thucydidis, quis Hyperidis ad famam processit? Ac ne carmen quidem sani coloris enituit, sed omnia quasi eodem cibo pasta non potuerunt usque ad senectutem canescere. Pictura quoque non alium exitum fecit, postquam Aegyptiorum audacia tam magnae artis compendiariam invenit."

Valete,

Julia

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "L Julia Aquila" <dis_pensible@...> wrote:
>
> Salvete Omnes,
>
> This hours selections are from Disticha Catonis translated by J. Marchand:
> BK1 Distich 3
> I think the first virtue to be keeping your tongue;
> He is close to God who knows how to keep quiet properly.
>
> Virtutem primam esse puto compescere linguam:
> Proximus ille deo est, qui scit ratione tacere.
>
>
> BK1 Distich 7
> Be constant and kind, as the case demands;
> The wise man changes his ways as time demands without fault.
>
> Constans et lenis, ut res expostulat, esto:
> Temporibus mores sapiens sine crimine mutat.
>
>
> BK1 Distich 15
> Remember to tell publicly of favors by others;
> And you yourself, when you do good to others, be silent about it
>
> Officium alterius multis narrare memento,
> Atque aliis cum tu bene feceris ipse, sileto.
>
>
> Bk2 Districh 14
> Be of strong mind when you are wrongly accused;
> No one is happy for long who wins with an injust judgment.
>
> Esto animo forti, cum sis damnatus inique;
> Nemo diu gaudet, qui iudice vincit iniquo.
>
>
> BK2 Districh 18
> Be stupid when the time or situation demands;
> To fake stupidity is at times the highest prudence.
>
> Insipiens esto, cum tempus postulat aut res;
> Stultitiam simulare loco prudentia summa est.
>
>
> Bk2 Districh 20
> Do not always believe someone who tells things;
> Little credence is to be paid (to them), because they talk a lot.
>
> Noli tu quaedam referenti credere semper;
> Exigua est tribuenda fides, quia multa loquuntur.
>
>
> BK2 Distich 27
> Look at what has happened, and see that which is coming;
> Imitate that god who looks in both directions (Janus).
>
> Quod sequitur specta, quodque imminet ante videto;
> Illum imitare deum, partem qui spectat utramque.
>
>
> BK2 Distich 29
> Never spurn public opinion alone,
> Lest you please no one when you want to spurn many.
>
> Iudicium populi numquam contempseris unus,
> Ne nulli placeas, dum vis contemnere multos.
>
>
> Bk3 Distich 13
> Learn from the examples of many what deeds you should emulate
> And which to avoid; the life of others is a mistress (teacher) to us.
>
> Multorum disce exemplis, quae facta sequaris,
> Quae fugias; vita est nobis aliena magistra.
>
>
> Bk3 Distich 15
> That which you know to be wrongly done, do not conceal,
> Lest by keeping silence you seem to be willing to imitate wrongdoers.
>
> Quod nosti haud recte factum, nolito tacere,
> Ne videare malos imitari velle tacendo.
>
>
> Bk3 Distich 17
> That which you bear by right, remember to bear patiently,
> And when you stand guilty before yourself, judge yourself strictly.
>
> Quod merito pateris, patienter ferre memento,
> Cumque reus tibi sis, ipsum te iudice damna.
>
>
> Bk4 Distich 9
> Whatever is suspect to you, immediately test what it is;
> For those things which are at first ignored often harm.
>
> Quod tibi suspectum est, confestim discute, quid sit;
> Namque solent, primo quae sunt neglecta, nocere.
>
>
> Bk4 Distich 13
> Ask for aid from your associates when you are in travail;
> No one is a better doctor than a faithful friend.
>
> Auxilium a notis petito, si forte labores;
> Nec quisquam melior medicus quam fidus amicus.
>
>
> BK 4 Distich 20
> Look quietly upon all things that people say;
> The speech of men hides their ways and reveals them also.
>
> Prospicito cuncta tacitus, quid quisque loquatur;
> Sermo hominum mores celat et indicat idem.
>
>
> Bk4 Distich 26
> In peaceful times always be on the lookout for adverse things,
> And again, in bad times, remember always to hope for better.
>
> Tranquillis rebus semper adversa timeto,
> Rursus in adversis melius sperare memento.
>
>
> Valete,
> Julia
>