Selected messages in Nova-Roma group. May 25-28, 2009

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66012 From: L Julia Aquila Date: 2009-05-25
Subject: Re: Classic Poetry, Prose, Proems
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66013 From: L Julia Aquila Date: 2009-05-25
Subject: Re: A dream come true
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66014 From: MCC Date: 2009-05-25
Subject: De assignatione quaestorum (II)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66015 From: C. Maria Caeca Date: 2009-05-25
Subject: Re: A dream come true
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66016 From: Maxima Valeria Messallina Date: 2009-05-25
Subject: Re: our untapped resource
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66017 From: C. Maria Caeca Date: 2009-05-25
Subject: Re: our untapped resource
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66018 From: aerdensrw Date: 2009-05-25
Subject: Re: A dream come true
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66019 From: Maxima Valeria Messallina Date: 2009-05-25
Subject: Re: Post-Cannes Reaction to "AGORA"
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66020 From: Timothy or Stephen Gallagher Date: 2009-05-25
Subject: chat
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66021 From: Maxima Valeria Messallina Date: 2009-05-25
Subject: Re: A dream come true
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66022 From: livia_plauta Date: 2009-05-25
Subject: Re: Videos about Ancient Rome
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66023 From: livia_plauta Date: 2009-05-25
Subject: Re: Videos about Ancient Rome
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66024 From: L Julia Aquila Date: 2009-05-25
Subject: Re: our untapped resource
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66025 From: L Julia Aquila Date: 2009-05-25
Subject: Re: Videos about Ancient Rome
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66026 From: Maxima Valeria Messallina Date: 2009-05-25
Subject: Re: Latin achievement
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66027 From: L Julia Aquila Date: 2009-05-25
Subject: Re: Classic Poetry, Prose, Proems
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66028 From: Matt Hucke Date: 2009-05-25
Subject: Re: chat
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66029 From: violetphearsen@yahoo.com Date: 2009-05-25
Subject: Oath of Office
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66030 From: Timothy or Stephen Gallagher Date: 2009-05-25
Subject: Pericles Funeral Oration
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66031 From: C. Maria Caeca Date: 2009-05-25
Subject: Re: Pericles Funeral Oration
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66032 From: livia_plauta Date: 2009-05-25
Subject: Re: Sulla's Teaching Skills
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66033 From: David Kling Date: 2009-05-25
Subject: Re: Sulla's Teaching Skills
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66034 From: Publius Ullerius Stephanus Venator Date: 2009-05-25
Subject: Re: Pericles Funeral Oration
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66035 From: Maior Date: 2009-05-25
Subject: Re: A dream come true
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66036 From: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com Date: 2009-05-25
Subject: Comitia Centuriata Election, 5/25/2009, 11:00 pm
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66037 From: livia_plauta Date: 2009-05-25
Subject: Re: our untapped resource
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66038 From: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com Date: 2009-05-25
Subject: Comitia Centuriata Election, 5/25/2009, 11:00 pm
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66039 From: livia_plauta Date: 2009-05-25
Subject: Re: our untapped resource
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66040 From: Gaius Petronius Dexter Date: 2009-05-25
Subject: Sulla's rebuttal - Re: Nova-Roma is life
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66041 From: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com Date: 2009-05-25
Subject: Posting rules in this Forum, 5/25/2009, 11:45 pm
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66042 From: galerius_of_rome Date: 2009-05-25
Subject: Âñïîìèíàþù óïàäåííîå
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66043 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2009-05-25
Subject: Re: A dream come true
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66044 From: Lucius Cornelius Cicero Date: 2009-05-25
Subject: Re: MY SUPPORT FOR K. FABIUS BUTEO MODIANUS
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66045 From: Q. Valerius Poplicola Date: 2009-05-25
Subject: Re: our untapped resource
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66046 From: Charlie Collins Date: 2009-05-25
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Âñïîìèíàþù óïàäåííîå
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66047 From: C. Maria Caeca Date: 2009-05-25
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Âñïîìèíàþù óïàäåííîå
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66048 From: Q. Valerius Poplicola Date: 2009-05-25
Subject: Re: MY SUPPORT FOR K. FABIUS BUTEO MODIANUS
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66049 From: Q. Valerius Poplicola Date: 2009-05-25
Subject: Re: our untapped resource
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66050 From: lathyrus77 Date: 2009-05-25
Subject: Re: our untapped resource
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66051 From: Robert Levee Date: 2009-05-25
Subject: Remembering The Fallen!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66052 From: C. Maria Caeca Date: 2009-05-25
Subject: Re: Remembering The Fallen!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66053 From: Q. Valerius Poplicola Date: 2009-05-25
Subject: Re: our untapped resource
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66054 From: lathyrus77 Date: 2009-05-25
Subject: Re: our untapped resource
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66055 From: M. Lucretius Agricola Date: 2009-05-25
Subject: Voting procedures reminder
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66056 From: Q. Valerius Poplicola Date: 2009-05-25
Subject: Re: our untapped resource
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66057 From: lathyrus77 Date: 2009-05-25
Subject: Re: our untapped resource
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66058 From: C. Maria Caeca Date: 2009-05-25
Subject: Re: our untapped resource
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66059 From: lathyrus77 Date: 2009-05-25
Subject: Re: our untapped resource
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66060 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2009-05-25
Subject: Rusticatio Virginiana (et al.) Latin immersion(s)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66061 From: David Kling Date: 2009-05-25
Subject: Re: Sulla's rebuttal - Re: Nova-Roma is life
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66062 From: David Kling Date: 2009-05-25
Subject: Re: MY SUPPORT FOR K. FABIUS BUTEO MODIANUS
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66063 From: David Kling Date: 2009-05-25
Subject: Re: MY SUPPORT FOR K. FABIUS BUTEO MODIANUS
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66064 From: Maior Date: 2009-05-25
Subject: Re: MY SUPPORT FOR K. FABIUS BUTEO MODIANUS
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66065 From: Steve Moore Date: 2009-05-26
Subject: Re: Sulla's rebuttal - Re: Nova-Roma is life
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66066 From: David Kling Date: 2009-05-26
Subject: Re: Sulla's rebuttal - Re: Nova-Roma is life
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66067 From: Maior Date: 2009-05-26
Subject: Sulla's rebuttal - Re: Nova-Roma is life
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66068 From: Q. Valerius Poplicola Date: 2009-05-26
Subject: Re: our untapped resource
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66069 From: QFabiusMaxmi@aol.com Date: 2009-05-26
Subject: Re: MY SUPPORT FOR K. FABIUS BUTEO MODIANUS
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66070 From: MCC Date: 2009-05-26
Subject: Re: COMITIA CENTURIATA: Election for Censor
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66071 From: lathyrus77 Date: 2009-05-26
Subject: Re: our untapped resource
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66072 From: violetphearsen@yahoo.com Date: 2009-05-26
Subject: Re: MY SUPPORT FOR K. FABIUS BUTEO MODIANUS
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66073 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2009-05-26
Subject: Re: MY SUPPORT FOR K. FABIUS BUTEO MODIANUS
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66074 From: Q. Valerius Poplicola Date: 2009-05-26
Subject: Re: MY SUPPORT FOR K. FABIUS BUTEO MODIANUS
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66075 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2009-05-26
Subject: Sulla's rebuttal - Re: Nova-Roma is life
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66076 From: Lucius Cornelius Cicero Date: 2009-05-26
Subject: Re: MY SUPPORT FOR K. FABIUS BUTEO MODIANUS
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66077 From: Q. Valerius Poplicola Date: 2009-05-26
Subject: Sulla's rebuttal - Re: Nova-Roma is life
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66078 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2009-05-26
Subject: Re: our untapped resource
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66079 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2009-05-26
Subject: Re: our untapped resource
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66080 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2009-05-26
Subject: A vote for NR is a vote for Cato
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66081 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2009-05-26
Subject: MY SUPPORT FOR C. EQUITIUS CATO FOR CENSOR
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66082 From: Titus Flavius Aquila Date: 2009-05-26
Subject: AW: [Nova-Roma] Re: our untapped resource
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66083 From: David Kling Date: 2009-05-26
Subject: Re: MY SUPPORT FOR C. EQUITIUS CATO FOR CENSOR
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66084 From: Titus Iulius Sabinus Date: 2009-05-26
Subject: My vote is for K. Fabius Buteo Modianus.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66085 From: L Julia Aquila Date: 2009-05-26
Subject: Re: MY SUPPORT FOR K. FABIUS BUTEO MODIANUS
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66086 From: L Julia Aquila Date: 2009-05-26
Subject: Re: Voting procedures reminder
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66087 From: Lucius Cornelius Cicero Date: 2009-05-26
Subject: Re: MY SUPPORT FOR K. FABIUS BUTEO MODIANUS
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66088 From: Lucius Cornelius Cicero Date: 2009-05-26
Subject: Re: MY SUPPORT FOR K. FABIUS BUTEO MODIANUS
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66089 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2009-05-26
Subject: Re: MY SUPPORT FOR C. EQUITIUS CATO FOR CENSOR
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66090 From: L Julia Aquila Date: 2009-05-26
Subject: Re: Classic Poetry, Prose, Proems
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66091 From: deciusiunius Date: 2009-05-26
Subject: Re: Two reasonable people should not fight, even if they don't share
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66092 From: PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@aol.com Date: 2009-05-26
Subject: Re: Candidacy!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66093 From: PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@aol.com Date: 2009-05-26
Subject: Re: procedural question
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66094 From: PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@aol.com Date: 2009-05-26
Subject: Re: MY SUPPORT FOR K. FABIUS BUTEO MODIANUS
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66095 From: lathyrus77 Date: 2009-05-26
Subject: Re: A vote for NR is a vote for Cato
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66096 From: PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@aol.com Date: 2009-05-26
Subject: Re: MY SUPPORT FOR K. FABIUS BUTEO MODIANUS
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66097 From: Timothy or Stephen Gallagher Date: 2009-05-26
Subject: Edictum Censor Tiberius Galerius Paulinus Census of Nova Roma 2762
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66098 From: PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@aol.com Date: 2009-05-26
Subject: Re: MY SUPPORT FOR K. FABIUS BUTEO MODIANUS
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66099 From: PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@aol.com Date: 2009-05-26
Subject: Re: A vote for NR is a vote for Cato
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66100 From: Timothy or Stephen Gallagher Date: 2009-05-26
Subject: JOKES
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66101 From: Timothy or Stephen Gallagher Date: 2009-05-26
Subject: Bad Roman Jokes
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66102 From: L Julia Aquila Date: 2009-05-26
Subject: Re: Bad Roman Jokes
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66103 From: enodia2002 Date: 2009-05-26
Subject: Rosetta Stone Latin
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66104 From: L Julia Aquila Date: 2009-05-26
Subject: Re: Classic Poetry, Prose, Proems
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66105 From: Lucius Cornelius Cicero Date: 2009-05-26
Subject: Re: A vote for NR is a vote for Cato
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66106 From: M.C.C. Date: 2009-05-26
Subject: Edicto censorio: Censo de Nova Roma año 2762 AUC
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66107 From: Maior Date: 2009-05-26
Subject: Re: MY SUPPORT FOR K. FABIUS BUTEO MODIANUS
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66108 From: C. Maria Caeca Date: 2009-05-26
Subject: Re: procedural question
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66109 From: QFabiusMaxmi@aol.com Date: 2009-05-26
Subject: Re: Roman political campaigning
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66110 From: Maior Date: 2009-05-26
Subject: Re: MY SUPPORT FOR K. FABIUS BUTEO MODIANUS
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66111 From: David .C Date: 2009-05-26
Subject: Re: Remembering The Fallen!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66112 From: livia_plauta Date: 2009-05-26
Subject: Re: A dream come true
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66113 From: livia_plauta Date: 2009-05-26
Subject: Re: A dream come true
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66114 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2009-05-26
Subject: Re: A dream come true
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66115 From: David Kling Date: 2009-05-26
Subject: Re: A dream come true
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66116 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2009-05-26
Subject: Re: A dream come true
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66117 From: Maior Date: 2009-05-26
Subject: Re: A dream come true
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66118 From: M. Lucretius Agricola Date: 2009-05-26
Subject: Re: Voting procedures reminder
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66119 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2009-05-26
Subject: Re: A dream come true
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66120 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2009-05-26
Subject: Re: A dream come true
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66121 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2009-05-26
Subject: Re: A dream come true
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66122 From: Terry Boyle Date: 2009-05-26
Subject: Re: A dream come true
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66123 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2009-05-26
Subject: Re: A dream come true
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66124 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2009-05-26
Subject: Re: A dream come true
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66125 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2009-05-26
Subject: Re: Sulla's Teaching Skills
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66126 From: Maior Date: 2009-05-26
Subject: Re: A dream come true
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66127 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2009-05-26
Subject: Re: A dream come true
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66128 From: Terry Boyle Date: 2009-05-26
Subject: Re: A dream come true
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66129 From: C. Maria Caeca Date: 2009-05-26
Subject: A modest suggestion
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66130 From: Lucius Cornelius Cicero Date: 2009-05-26
Subject: Re: Roman political campaigning
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66131 From: Timothy or Stephen Gallagher Date: 2009-05-26
Subject: Re: A dream come true
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66132 From: Terry Boyle Date: 2009-05-26
Subject: Re: A dream come true
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66133 From: Gnaeus Iulius Caesar Date: 2009-05-27
Subject: Re: A dream come true
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66134 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2009-05-27
Subject: Re: A dream come true
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66135 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2009-05-27
Subject: Re: A modest suggestion
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66136 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2009-05-27
Subject: Re: Remembering The Fallen!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66137 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2009-05-27
Subject: Re: A vote for NR is a vote for Cato
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66138 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2009-05-27
Subject: Re: A dream come true
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66139 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2009-05-27
Subject: Re: our untapped resource
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66140 From: MCC Date: 2009-05-27
Subject: COMITIA CENTURIATA: Election for Censor
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66141 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2009-05-27
Subject: Re: Latin achievement
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66142 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2009-05-27
Subject: Re: Pericles Funeral Oration
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66143 From: M. Lucretius Agricola Date: 2009-05-27
Subject: Re: Voting procedures reminder
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66144 From: David Kling Date: 2009-05-27
Subject: Re: A dream come true
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66145 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2009-05-27
Subject: Re: A dream come true
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66146 From: A. Sempronius Regulus Date: 2009-05-27
Subject: Re: A modest suggestion
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66147 From: QFabiusMaxmi@aol.com Date: 2009-05-27
Subject: Re: Roman political campaigning
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66148 From: PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@aol.com Date: 2009-05-27
Subject: Re: A dream come true
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66149 From: PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@aol.com Date: 2009-05-27
Subject: Re: A dream come true
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66150 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2009-05-27
Subject: Re: A dream come true
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66151 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2009-05-27
Subject: Re: A modest suggestion
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66152 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2009-05-27
Subject: Re: A dream come true
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66153 From: M•IVL• SEVERVS Date: 2009-05-27
Subject: EDICTVM CONSVLARE X DE DESIGNATIONE SENATORVM DELECTIS QVIBVS ALIQVI
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66154 From: M•IVL• SEVERVS Date: 2009-05-27
Subject: EDICTVM CONSVLARE X -CORRECTED VERSION
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66155 From: r mills Date: 2009-05-27
Subject: Citizenship Test
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66156 From: Roger Date: 2009-05-27
Subject: Article from This Month's Biblical Archaeology Review (BAR): Ancient
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66157 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2009-05-27
Subject: De censura
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66159 From: Maior Date: 2009-05-27
Subject: Re: legal discussions (was a dream come true)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66160 From: C. Maria Caeca Date: 2009-05-27
Subject: Re: A modest suggestion
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66161 From: gualterus_graecus Date: 2009-05-27
Subject: Re: A modest suggestion
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66162 From: A. Sempronius Regulus Date: 2009-05-27
Subject: Re: A modest suggestion and Moderators.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66163 From: C. Maria Caeca Date: 2009-05-27
Subject: Re: A modest suggestion
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66164 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2009-05-27
Subject: Re: A modest suggestion and Moderators.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66165 From: Timothy or Stephen Gallagher Date: 2009-05-27
Subject: Our Fourm
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66166 From: Maior Date: 2009-05-27
Subject: Re: Our Fourm
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66167 From: Robert Levee Date: 2009-05-27
Subject: Re: Our Fourm
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66168 From: C. Maria Caeca Date: 2009-05-27
Subject: chit chat
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66169 From: Timothy or Stephen Gallagher Date: 2009-05-27
Subject: Re: Our Fourm
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66170 From: Timothy or Stephen Gallagher Date: 2009-05-27
Subject: Re: chit chat
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66171 From: C. Maria Caeca Date: 2009-05-27
Subject: wine!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66172 From: Robert Levee Date: 2009-05-27
Subject: Conversation!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66173 From: Robert Levee Date: 2009-05-27
Subject: Conversation!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66174 From: Robin Marquardt Date: 2009-05-27
Subject: Re: Rosetta Stone Latin
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66175 From: C. Maria Caeca Date: 2009-05-27
Subject: private labeled products random thoughts
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66176 From: Kirsteen Wright Date: 2009-05-28
Subject: Re: Our Fourm
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66177 From: MCC Date: 2009-05-28
Subject: COMITIA CENTURIATA: Election for Censor
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66178 From: Timothy or Stephen Gallagher Date: 2009-05-28
Subject: Re: private labeled products random thoughts
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66179 From: Lucius Coruncanius Cato Date: 2009-05-28
Subject: Re: Conversation!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66180 From: Chantal Gaudiano Date: 2009-05-28
Subject: C. Centuriata Election: Phase 1 Results
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66181 From: marcushoratius Date: 2009-05-28
Subject: Re: A dream come true
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66182 From: aerdensrw Date: 2009-05-28
Subject: Invalid Votes from Phase 1
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66183 From: Robert Levee Date: 2009-05-28
Subject: Re: Conversation!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66184 From: Diana Octavia Aventina Date: 2009-05-28
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Âñïîìèíàþù óïàäåííîå
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66185 From: David Kling Date: 2009-05-28
Subject: Re: A dream come true
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66186 From: Ugo Coppola Date: 2009-05-28
Subject: Re: Invalid Votes from Phase 1
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66187 From: Robert Levee Date: 2009-05-28
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Âñïîìèíàþù óïàäåííîå
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66188 From: q_caelia_laeta Date: 2009-05-28
Subject: Conversation: Conventus!



Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66012 From: L Julia Aquila Date: 2009-05-25
Subject: Re: Classic Poetry, Prose, Proems
Salvete omnes,

For this hours selection I offer from Petronius:
THE SATYRICON
Petronius CH 1
[II ] Under such a training it is no more possible to acquire good taste than it is not to stink, if you live in a kitchen. Give me leave to tell you that you rhetoricians are chiefly to blame for the ruin of Oratory, for with your silly, idle phrases, meant only to tickle the ears of an audience, you have enervated and deboshed the very substance of true eloquence.
Young men were not bound down to declamations in the days when Sophocles and Euripides found the very words they wanted to best express their meaning. No cloistered professor had as yet darkened men's intellects, when Pindar and the nine Lyric bards shrank from emulating the Homeric note. And not to cite poets exclusively,--I cannot see that either Plato or Demosthenes ever practised this sort of mental exercise. A noble, and so to say chaste, style is not overloaded with ornament, not turgid; its own natural beauty gives it elevation.
Then after a while this windy, extravagant deluge of words invaded Athens from Asia, and like a malignant star, blasting the minds of young men aiming at lofty ideals, instantly broke up all rules of art and struck eloquence dumb. Since that day who has reached the perfection of Thucydides, the glory of Hyperides? Nay! not a poem has been written of bright and wholesome complexion; but all, as if fed on the same unhealthy diet, have lacked stamina to attain old age. Painting moreover shared the same fate, after Egypt presumptuously invented a compendious method for that noble Art.

[II] "Qui inter haec nutriuntur, non magis sapere possunt quam bene olere qui in culina habitant. Pace vestra liceat dixisse, primi omnium eloquentiam perdidistis. Levibus enim atque inanibus sonis ludibria quaedam excitando, effecistis ut corpus orationis enervaretur et caderet. Nondum iuvenes declamationibus continebantur, cum Sophocles aut Euripides invenerunt verba quibus deberent loqui. Nondum umbraticus doctor ingenia deleverat, cum Pindarus novemque lyrici Homericis versibus canere timuerunt. Et ne poetas quidem ad testimonium citem, certe neque Platona neque Demosthenen ad hoc genus exercitationis accessisse video. Grandis et, ut ita dicam, pudica oratio non est maculosa nec turgida, sed naturali pulchritudine exsurgit. Nuper ventosa istaec et enormis loquacitas Athenas ex Asia commigravit animosque iuvenum ad magna surgentes veluti pestilenti quodam sidere adflavit, semelque corrupta regula eloquentia stetit et obmutuit. Ad summam, quis postea Thucydidis, quis Hyperidis ad famam processit? Ac ne carmen quidem sani coloris enituit, sed omnia quasi eodem cibo pasta non potuerunt usque ad senectutem canescere. Pictura quoque non alium exitum fecit, postquam Aegyptiorum audacia tam magnae artis compendiariam invenit."

Valete,

Julia

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "L Julia Aquila" <dis_pensible@...> wrote:
>
> Salvete Omnes,
>
> This hours selections are from Disticha Catonis translated by J. Marchand:
> BK1 Distich 3
> I think the first virtue to be keeping your tongue;
> He is close to God who knows how to keep quiet properly.
>
> Virtutem primam esse puto compescere linguam:
> Proximus ille deo est, qui scit ratione tacere.
>
>
> BK1 Distich 7
> Be constant and kind, as the case demands;
> The wise man changes his ways as time demands without fault.
>
> Constans et lenis, ut res expostulat, esto:
> Temporibus mores sapiens sine crimine mutat.
>
>
> BK1 Distich 15
> Remember to tell publicly of favors by others;
> And you yourself, when you do good to others, be silent about it
>
> Officium alterius multis narrare memento,
> Atque aliis cum tu bene feceris ipse, sileto.
>
>
> Bk2 Districh 14
> Be of strong mind when you are wrongly accused;
> No one is happy for long who wins with an injust judgment.
>
> Esto animo forti, cum sis damnatus inique;
> Nemo diu gaudet, qui iudice vincit iniquo.
>
>
> BK2 Districh 18
> Be stupid when the time or situation demands;
> To fake stupidity is at times the highest prudence.
>
> Insipiens esto, cum tempus postulat aut res;
> Stultitiam simulare loco prudentia summa est.
>
>
> Bk2 Districh 20
> Do not always believe someone who tells things;
> Little credence is to be paid (to them), because they talk a lot.
>
> Noli tu quaedam referenti credere semper;
> Exigua est tribuenda fides, quia multa loquuntur.
>
>
> BK2 Distich 27
> Look at what has happened, and see that which is coming;
> Imitate that god who looks in both directions (Janus).
>
> Quod sequitur specta, quodque imminet ante videto;
> Illum imitare deum, partem qui spectat utramque.
>
>
> BK2 Distich 29
> Never spurn public opinion alone,
> Lest you please no one when you want to spurn many.
>
> Iudicium populi numquam contempseris unus,
> Ne nulli placeas, dum vis contemnere multos.
>
>
> Bk3 Distich 13
> Learn from the examples of many what deeds you should emulate
> And which to avoid; the life of others is a mistress (teacher) to us.
>
> Multorum disce exemplis, quae facta sequaris,
> Quae fugias; vita est nobis aliena magistra.
>
>
> Bk3 Distich 15
> That which you know to be wrongly done, do not conceal,
> Lest by keeping silence you seem to be willing to imitate wrongdoers.
>
> Quod nosti haud recte factum, nolito tacere,
> Ne videare malos imitari velle tacendo.
>
>
> Bk3 Distich 17
> That which you bear by right, remember to bear patiently,
> And when you stand guilty before yourself, judge yourself strictly.
>
> Quod merito pateris, patienter ferre memento,
> Cumque reus tibi sis, ipsum te iudice damna.
>
>
> Bk4 Distich 9
> Whatever is suspect to you, immediately test what it is;
> For those things which are at first ignored often harm.
>
> Quod tibi suspectum est, confestim discute, quid sit;
> Namque solent, primo quae sunt neglecta, nocere.
>
>
> Bk4 Distich 13
> Ask for aid from your associates when you are in travail;
> No one is a better doctor than a faithful friend.
>
> Auxilium a notis petito, si forte labores;
> Nec quisquam melior medicus quam fidus amicus.
>
>
> BK 4 Distich 20
> Look quietly upon all things that people say;
> The speech of men hides their ways and reveals them also.
>
> Prospicito cuncta tacitus, quid quisque loquatur;
> Sermo hominum mores celat et indicat idem.
>
>
> Bk4 Distich 26
> In peaceful times always be on the lookout for adverse things,
> And again, in bad times, remember always to hope for better.
>
> Tranquillis rebus semper adversa timeto,
> Rursus in adversis melius sperare memento.
>
>
> Valete,
> Julia
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66013 From: L Julia Aquila Date: 2009-05-25
Subject: Re: A dream come true
Salve Livia!

That is wonderful news! I am very happy for you...and a little envious. That is an experience that is truly a gift.

Vale,

Julia


--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "livia_plauta" <livia.plauta@...> wrote:
>
> I posted this in the Latinitas list, but then I realized that I'd better post it here too, because at least one good friend of mine is still banned from that list.
> More reports about Floralia are forthcoming.
>
> L. Livia Plauta omnibus sodalibus S.P:D.
>
> Over the weekend, as we announced on many lists already, we Novi Romani from Pannonia had a big role in the Floralia festival at the Aquincum Museum here in Budapest.
> We held a big sacrifice to various gods in honour of the two-thousandth anniversary of the creation of Pannonia, we held a roman fashion show, we demonstrated how a roman marriage by confarreatio and a trial took place.
>
> We had guests from three countries: Sex. Lucilius Tutor and his girlfriend from the Czech Republic, A. Apollonius Cordus from London, and C. Petronius Dexter from Paris.
>
> The good news is that four of us: A. Apollonius Cordus, C. Petronius Dexter, Cn. Cornelius Lentulus and myself were able to speak Latin for hours on end, at the festival location, at the restaurant, and at my place.
> I knew the three men I mentioned are all excellent latinists, and I had no doubt they could speak Latin fluently, but the biggest surprise for me came from myself. I didn't consider myself latine loquens, so I was quite surprised when I found myself speaking Latin, with mistakes, of course, and having to ask help for words or phrases, but for hours, and on every sort of topic.
> I think the biggest merit goes to Cordus, who is so dedicated to living latin that he answers in latin even when addressed in English.
>
> Anyway one of my biggest dreams came true this weekend, the dream of being able to learn Latin the way living languages are usually learned, by interaction with a community of speakers, by trial and error, in connection with everyday situations.
>
> This demonstrates that the goals Avitus and Scholastica pursue, of having a community that speaks Latin naturally, as a means of communication, is actually reachable in reality and within Nova Roma.
>
> All of us (the four people mentioned above) made a vow to meet again as soon as possible in the future and continue speaking Latin, as we had such a wonderful time together.
>
> I now have to consider myself latine loquens, but unfortunately I'm not latine scribens yet.
> That's why I'm writing this here and not to the Nova Roma latina mailing list.
> I realized I'm much more shy in writing, and I don't dare see my mistakes in black on white, so for the moment the situation with my Latin is similar to that of my French: I can talk but not write.
> So far, my spoken French is still way better than my Latin, but I hope that will change soon.
>
> Optime valete,
> Livia
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66014 From: MCC Date: 2009-05-25
Subject: De assignatione quaestorum (II)


Quaestors assignment for 2762 AVC



  • Quaestor P. Annaeus Placidus Constantinus is assigned to Praetor P. Memmius Albucius
  • Quaestor Titus Flavius Aquila is assigned to the Aedile Curule L. Coruncanius Cato
  • Quaestor Lucius Gratius Nerva is assigned to the Aedile Plebis M. Arminius Maior


Given under our hands this 25th day of May 2762 a.u.c. (AD 2009 ) in the consulship of M. Curiatio and M. Iulio

M. Curiatius Complutensis

M. Iulius Severus

Consules

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66015 From: C. Maria Caeca Date: 2009-05-25
Subject: Re: A dream come true
Salve Livia, et salvete omnes,

How absolutely delightful for you! Of course, immersion is always the best
way to learn a language, and it is also a wonderful experience. I give you
great joy of it ... now practice, practice, practice! (big smile).

Vale et valete bene,
C. Maria Caeca
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66016 From: Maxima Valeria Messallina Date: 2009-05-25
Subject: Re: our untapped resource
I have been told the same thing and that is the one reason I have never participated in the market day chats.
 
Maxima Valeria Messallina


--- On Sat, 5/23/09, lathyrus77 <lathyrus77@...> wrote:

From: lathyrus77 <lathyrus77@...>
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: our untapped resource
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Date: Saturday, May 23, 2009, 11:52 AM

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com, "C. Maria Caeca" <shoshanahathaway@ ...> wrote:
>

> You can find and download the IRC software which is called Mirc by simply
> doing a Google search on the term Mirc. Once you have done so and installed
> it, simply go to IRC.freenode. net and then type /join #NovaRoma. That's it.
> Believe me, if *I* could do it, anyone on this list (or a 4 year old who has
> never touched a computer before, can).
>
> Valete Bene,
> C. Maria Caeca
>

Except it's run by the BA rats, so unless you're on good terms with those trolls, they'll stop you from participating.

I was muted within 3 minutes.

-Anna


Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66017 From: C. Maria Caeca Date: 2009-05-25
Subject: Re: our untapped resource
salvete omnes,
 
OK, I inadvertently provided some incorrect information, which I will now correct, with apologies.
 
The chat room is private, however, the owner of it allows the Aedils to operate it.  any citizen can use it, at any time, and I have many totally apolitical, enjoyable, informal conversations there.  It will be what the people who use it make of it, but if citizens would feel more comfortable, perhaps NR could set up it's own official room where everyone would feel comfortable.
 
Valete,
C. Maria Caeca
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66018 From: aerdensrw Date: 2009-05-25
Subject: Re: A dream come true
P. Corva gaudialis L. Liviae Plautae s.p.d.

Wow, that is marvelous!!!

It speaks of much time and study. That is wonderful, to actually be with other Latin speakers and to spend enough time with them to get in some good practice!

The Floralia festival sounds like it was a great succsss. I would have loved to have been there. :)

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "livia_plauta" <livia.plauta@...> wrote:
>
> I posted this in the Latinitas list, but then I realized that I'd better post it here too, because at least one good friend of mine is still banned from that list.
> More reports about Floralia are forthcoming.
>
> L. Livia Plauta omnibus sodalibus S.P:D.
>
> Over the weekend, as we announced on many lists already, we Novi Romani from Pannonia had a big role in the Floralia festival at the Aquincum Museum here in Budapest.
> We held a big sacrifice to various gods in honour of the two-thousandth anniversary of the creation of Pannonia, we held a roman fashion show, we demonstrated how a roman marriage by confarreatio and a trial took place.
>
> We had guests from three countries: Sex. Lucilius Tutor and his girlfriend from the Czech Republic, A. Apollonius Cordus from London, and C. Petronius Dexter from Paris.
>
> The good news is that four of us: A. Apollonius Cordus, C. Petronius Dexter, Cn. Cornelius Lentulus and myself were able to speak Latin for hours on end, at the festival location, at the restaurant, and at my place.
> I knew the three men I mentioned are all excellent latinists, and I had no doubt they could speak Latin fluently, but the biggest surprise for me came from myself. I didn't consider myself latine loquens, so I was quite surprised when I found myself speaking Latin, with mistakes, of course, and having to ask help for words or phrases, but for hours, and on every sort of topic.
> I think the biggest merit goes to Cordus, who is so dedicated to living latin that he answers in latin even when addressed in English.
>
> Anyway one of my biggest dreams came true this weekend, the dream of being able to learn Latin the way living languages are usually learned, by interaction with a community of speakers, by trial and error, in connection with everyday situations.
>
> This demonstrates that the goals Avitus and Scholastica pursue, of having a community that speaks Latin naturally, as a means of communication, is actually reachable in reality and within Nova Roma.
>
> All of us (the four people mentioned above) made a vow to meet again as soon as possible in the future and continue speaking Latin, as we had such a wonderful time together.
>
> I now have to consider myself latine loquens, but unfortunately I'm not latine scribens yet.
> That's why I'm writing this here and not to the Nova Roma latina mailing list.
> I realized I'm much more shy in writing, and I don't dare see my mistakes in black on white, so for the moment the situation with my Latin is similar to that of my French: I can talk but not write.
> So far, my spoken French is still way better than my Latin, but I hope that will change soon.
>
> Optime valete,
> Livia
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66019 From: Maxima Valeria Messallina Date: 2009-05-25
Subject: Re: Post-Cannes Reaction to "AGORA"
Thank you for sharing all of this with us. I eagerly await this movie. I so seldom go to the movies anymore, but I am really looking forward to this one.
 
Vale bene in pace Deorum,
 
Maxima Valeria Messallina


--- On Sun, 5/24/09, enodia2002 <walkyr@...> wrote:

From: enodia2002 <walkyr@...>
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Post-Cannes Reaction to "AGORA"
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Date: Sunday, May 24, 2009, 11:16 AM

Post-Cannes Reaction to “Agora�

The movie “Agora�, which centers on the life of Neoplatonist pagan philosopher Hypatia, had its first official screening at the Cannes Film Festival and initial reviews are trickling in from the entertainment press. While some thought the epic overreached and fell a bit flat, others, like Variety’s Todd McCarthy, thinks the film succeeds with its handling of difficult subjects despite some “dramaturgical� shortcomings.

Director Alejandro Amenábar with Rachel Weisz

“…there is much in the picture to sustain sympathetic interest, including its dedicated historical perspective, intellectual seriousness and credible presentation of epic film elements that have often tripped up filmmakers in the past. Then there is the physical side of the production, which is genuinely impressive. Lensing entirely in Malta, Amenabar has fleshed out real locations with extensive sets and helpful (and largely undetectable) CGI extensions to provide a striking impression of a legendary ancient city. Production designer Guy Hendrix Dyas has mixed traditional Greco-Roman style buildings with Egyptian motifs and various interior decorative influences to palpably evoke a Mediterranean port city where many cultures convened. Gabriella Pescucci’s costumes colorfully support this approach, and Xavi Gimenez’s widescreen lensing captures it all with colorful mobility. Dario Marianelli’s score is rich, with occasional swells into the bombastic.�

Also speaking positively about the film are the Hollywood Reporter’s Natasha Senjanovic, who says that Rachel Weisz gives an “unfaltering� performance as Hypatia, and Patrick Goldstein of the Los Angeles Times who calls the film rich in “visual imagination�. As for the historical accuracy buffs, The Guardian’s Charlotte Higgins calls “Agora� a “gift to classicists�.

“Classicists are going to have a field day with Alejandro Amenábar’s Agora, which premiered yesterday at the Cannes film festival. Starring Rachel Weisz as Hypatia, the 4th- to 5th-century Alexandrian astronomer, philosopher and mathematician, who was brutally killed by an angry Christian mob, it avoids some of the pitfalls of movies set in the ancient world. The characters behave naturally and speak normally, without either jolting archaisms or ridiculous anachronisms, and the world that has been created to stand in for Alexandria â€" a huge set on Malta â€" works well, with minimum CGI nastiness and an obvious attention to historical detail. The costumes and the “lookâ€� of the characters was based on Romano-Egyptian mummy portraits, said Amenábar at his press conference, and that was deftly done.â€�

Even better, Higgins assures us that the film manages to “deftly� include the famous tale of Hypatia repelling a suitor by showing him her menstrual rags. Also reassuring to those worried that Hypatia the virgin philosopher would be thrust into romance is this comment by director Alejandro Amenabar when counselling Rachel Weisz in the role.

“Rachel had accepted the part, but then she grew worried about that solitude, so she called me one day to talk,â€� Amenabar recalls. “I told her, ‘Remember, I’m not offering you the part of the scientist’s wife. You are the scientist. And you are very much in love â€" you’re just in love with the sky.’ â€�

So it looks like “Agora� really will be a treat for Pagan film-goers once it sees wide release in December. Prepare to ramp up your expectations! I can’t wait to see this one on the big screen.

Tags: Agora, Christianity, film, Hypatia, movies, Paganism


Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66020 From: Timothy or Stephen Gallagher Date: 2009-05-25
Subject: chat

Salvete

FYI

From the NR Wiki

IRC chat

Each Market Day, all citizens are invited to the IRC chat sessions. While this service is available at any time, it is hoped that by choosing a particular time, more people will participate then, and a large number of people can be encountered at once.
There are two recommended times to participate on Market Days:
To join the chat, download an IRC client and go to the URL irc://irc.novaroma.org/NovaRoma . Further details about the software, the channel, and setting your name can be found at the IRC (Nova Roma) article.
 
 
Valete
 
Paulinus
 

To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
From: shoshanahathaway@...
Date: Mon, 25 May 2009 12:02:00 -0400
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: our untapped resource



salvete omnes,
 
OK, I inadvertently provided some incorrect information, which I will now correct, with apologies.
 
The chat room is private, however, the owner of it allows the Aedils to operate it.  any citizen can use it, at any time, and I have many totally apolitical, enjoyable, informal conversations there.  It will be what the people who use it make of it, but if citizens would feel more comfortable, perhaps NR could set up it's own official room where everyone would feel comfortable.
 
Valete,
C. Maria Caeca


Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66021 From: Maxima Valeria Messallina Date: 2009-05-25
Subject: Re: A dream come true
Wow, sounds like an awesome experience for all. I am so impressed with how much you did in just one weekend. I am looking forward to any videos of the events. How I wish I could have gone. I'm so happy for you and you have given me even more incentive to improve my Latin. That should put a smile on Scholastica's face :)
 
Vale bene in pace Deorum,
 
Maxima Valeria Messallina


--- On Mon, 5/25/09, livia_plauta <livia.plauta@...> wrote:

From: livia_plauta <livia.plauta@...>
Subject: [Nova-Roma] A dream come true
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Date: Monday, May 25, 2009, 7:52 AM

I posted this in the Latinitas list, but then I realized that I'd better post it here too, because at least one good friend of mine is still banned from that list.
More reports about Floralia are forthcoming.

L. Livia Plauta omnibus sodalibus S.P:D.

Over the weekend, as we announced on many lists already, we Novi Romani from Pannonia had a big role in the Floralia festival at the Aquincum Museum here in Budapest.
We held a big sacrifice to various gods in honour of the two-thousandth anniversary of the creation of Pannonia, we held a roman fashion show, we demonstrated how a roman marriage by confarreatio and a trial took place.

We had guests from three countries: Sex. Lucilius Tutor and his girlfriend from the Czech Republic, A. Apollonius Cordus from London, and C. Petronius Dexter from Paris.

The good news is that four of us: A. Apollonius Cordus, C. Petronius Dexter, Cn. Cornelius Lentulus and myself were able to speak Latin for hours on end, at the festival location, at the restaurant, and at my place.
I knew the three men I mentioned are all excellent latinists, and I had no doubt they could speak Latin fluently, but the biggest surprise for me came from myself. I didn't consider myself latine loquens, so I was quite surprised when I found myself speaking Latin, with mistakes, of course, and having to ask help for words or phrases, but for hours, and on every sort of topic.
I think the biggest merit goes to Cordus, who is so dedicated to living latin that he answers in latin even when addressed in English.

Anyway one of my biggest dreams came true this weekend, the dream of being able to learn Latin the way living languages are usually learned, by interaction with a community of speakers, by trial and error, in connection with everyday situations.

This demonstrates that the goals Avitus and Scholastica pursue, of having a community that speaks Latin naturally, as a means of communication, is actually reachable in reality and within Nova Roma.

All of us (the four people mentioned above) made a vow to meet again as soon as possible in the future and continue speaking Latin, as we had such a wonderful time together.

I now have to consider myself latine loquens, but unfortunately I'm not latine scribens yet.
That's why I'm writing this here and not to the Nova Roma latina mailing list.
I realized I'm much more shy in writing, and I don't dare see my mistakes in black on white, so for the moment the situation with my Latin is similar to that of my French: I can talk but not write.
So far, my spoken French is still way better than my Latin, but I hope that will change soon.

Optime valete,
Livia


Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66022 From: livia_plauta Date: 2009-05-25
Subject: Re: Videos about Ancient Rome
Salvete,
oohh! Julia Aquila had to post a flood of interesting posts and links just when I was unable to read email because of real-life occupation with Floralia!

But now I had time to watch these. I have to say the Beatles video was totally incomprehensible, unlike the video on Theseus and Ariadne.
It's worth seeing the last part too of the latter:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=thya22SNCcg&feature=related
True, it has the credits, but also the end of the story.

Judging from the credits this is a school project by first-year Catalonian high-school students.
Congratulations to them! They have a beautiful and clear pronunciation and everything is perfectly understandable. They used very basic vocabulary, which is almost totally the same in modern Greek too. The plus is that Spanish and Greek accents are really very similar, so it makes their project more credible. What a little jewel!

I wish we had done something like that at high school! True, there weren't the technical means to make videos back then, but our Latin and Greek teacher never thought to make us do a play.

Maybe our new aedilis curulis could go do some recruiting for NR among last year students in that school. Surely we need people like that in NR!

Valete,
Livia

>
> Salvete omnes,
>
> A bit of comedy first:
> Ovid's Pyramus and Thisbe performed by the Beatles
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DOpEZM6OEvI
>
>
> This is the tale of Theseus and Ariadne, and Greek but I thought I would slip it in, I suppose I could say it is Plutarch's version thereby it would be by a Greek who was a Roman citizen... anyway it is very enjoyable despite the language barrier, I was told it was filmed in Greece but it's Spain, and the costumes and scenery are beautiful. Oh and please forgive the occasional use of tennis shoes.:
> Pars 1
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B_5DS4bS3ds&eurl=http%3A%2F%2Feclassics%2Ening%2Ecom2Fvideo2Fo2Dminotayros&feature=player_embedded
> I did not include Par 2 because most of it is credits.
>
> Valete,
> Julia
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66023 From: livia_plauta Date: 2009-05-25
Subject: Re: Videos about Ancient Rome
Ah, and the same person has posted a video called "Verba amatoria". it's a greek folk song, with the text in modern Greek, and the translation into ancient Greek and Latin.

Enjoy: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=thya22SNCcg&feature=related

>
> Salvete,
> oohh! Julia Aquila had to post a flood of interesting posts and links just when I was unable to read email because of real-life occupation with Floralia!
>
> But now I had time to watch these. I have to say the Beatles video was totally incomprehensible, unlike the video on Theseus and Ariadne.
> It's worth seeing the last part too of the latter:
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=thya22SNCcg&feature=related
> True, it has the credits, but also the end of the story.
>
> Judging from the credits this is a school project by first-year Catalonian high-school students.
> Congratulations to them! They have a beautiful and clear pronunciation and everything is perfectly understandable. They used very basic vocabulary, which is almost totally the same in modern Greek too. The plus is that Spanish and Greek accents are really very similar, so it makes their project more credible. What a little jewel!
>
> I wish we had done something like that at high school! True, there weren't the technical means to make videos back then, but our Latin and Greek teacher never thought to make us do a play.
>
> Maybe our new aedilis curulis could go do some recruiting for NR among last year students in that school. Surely we need people like that in NR!
>
> Valete,
> Livia
>
> >
> > Salvete omnes,
> >
> > A bit of comedy first:
> > Ovid's Pyramus and Thisbe performed by the Beatles
> > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DOpEZM6OEvI
> >
> >
> > This is the tale of Theseus and Ariadne, and Greek but I thought I would slip it in, I suppose I could say it is Plutarch's version thereby it would be by a Greek who was a Roman citizen... anyway it is very enjoyable despite the language barrier, I was told it was filmed in Greece but it's Spain, and the costumes and scenery are beautiful. Oh and please forgive the occasional use of tennis shoes.:
> > Pars 1
> > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B_5DS4bS3ds&eurl=http%3A%2F%2Feclassics%2Ening%2Ecom2Fvideo2Fo2Dminotayros&feature=player_embedded
> > I did not include Par 2 because most of it is credits.
> >
> > Valete,
> > Julia
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66024 From: L Julia Aquila Date: 2009-05-25
Subject: Re: our untapped resource
Salve Mariae Caecae,

Thank you for the correction, that was what I thought originally - that the irc chat is private.
Citizens might be more comfortable in an official Nova Roma chatroom so i believe that would be a good option.

Vale,
Julia


--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "C. Maria Caeca" <shoshanahathaway@...> wrote:
>
> salvete omnes,
>
> OK, I inadvertently provided some incorrect information, which I will now correct, with apologies.
>
> The chat room is private, however, the owner of it allows the Aedils to operate it. any citizen can use it, at any time, and I have many totally apolitical, enjoyable, informal conversations there. It will be what the people who use it make of it, but if citizens would feel more comfortable, perhaps NR could set up it's own official room where everyone would feel comfortable.
>
> Valete,
> C. Maria Caeca
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66025 From: L Julia Aquila Date: 2009-05-25
Subject: Re: Videos about Ancient Rome
Salve Livia,

Just wanted to have something waiting for you when you came back!*laughs*
Glad you enjoyed them!

Truthfully I would have rather have been with you and the cives at Floralia though;)

Vale,
Julia

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "livia_plauta" <livia.plauta@...> wrote:
>
> Salvete,
> oohh! Julia Aquila had to post a flood of interesting posts and links just when I was unable to read email because of real-life occupation with Floralia!
>
> But now I had time to watch these. I have to say the Beatles video was totally incomprehensible, unlike the video on Theseus and Ariadne.
> It's worth seeing the last part too of the latter:
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=thya22SNCcg&feature=related
> True, it has the credits, but also the end of the story.
>
> Judging from the credits this is a school project by first-year Catalonian high-school students.
> Congratulations to them! They have a beautiful and clear pronunciation and everything is perfectly understandable. They used very basic vocabulary, which is almost totally the same in modern Greek too. The plus is that Spanish and Greek accents are really very similar, so it makes their project more credible. What a little jewel!
>
> I wish we had done something like that at high school! True, there weren't the technical means to make videos back then, but our Latin and Greek teacher never thought to make us do a play.
>
> Maybe our new aedilis curulis could go do some recruiting for NR among last year students in that school. Surely we need people like that in NR!
>
> Valete,
> Livia
>
> >
> > Salvete omnes,
> >
> > A bit of comedy first:
> > Ovid's Pyramus and Thisbe performed by the Beatles
> > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DOpEZM6OEvI
> >
> >
> > This is the tale of Theseus and Ariadne, and Greek but I thought I would slip it in, I suppose I could say it is Plutarch's version thereby it would be by a Greek who was a Roman citizen... anyway it is very enjoyable despite the language barrier, I was told it was filmed in Greece but it's Spain, and the costumes and scenery are beautiful. Oh and please forgive the occasional use of tennis shoes.:
> > Pars 1
> > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B_5DS4bS3ds&eurl=http%3A%2F%2Feclassics%2Ening%2Ecom2Fvideo2Fo2Dminotayros&feature=player_embedded
> > I did not include Par 2 because most of it is credits.
> >
> > Valete,
> > Julia
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66026 From: Maxima Valeria Messallina Date: 2009-05-25
Subject: Re: Latin achievement
Congratulations to all the students in Latina I for their perseverance and hard work.
 
Vale bene in pace Deorum,
 
Maxima Valeria Messallina
 


--- On Fri, 5/22/09, A. Tullia Scholastica <fororom@...> wrote:

From: A. Tullia Scholastica <fororom@...>
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Latin achievement
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Date: Friday, May 22, 2009, 1:29 AM

A. Tullia Scholastica quiritibus, sociis, peregrinisque bonae voluntatis S.P.D.

    I am pleased to report that all students in Grammatica Latina I have passed their final examination, and will also pass the course, though I have not yet computed the course grades.  They have persevered through a very difficult course and endured the death of the original course server along with the jury-rigged methods we have had to use to conduct our courses, and deserve congratulations for that alone.  

    In this course they have learned all five of the Latin noun declensions, the adjective and pronoun declensions, and the indicative mood of the verb in both the active and passive voices.  They have learned a good bit of vocabulary, and even touched upon idioms and modern vocabulary not included in their text.  They have learned to read simple Latin sentences and even entire paragraphs, and to translate sentences from English into Latin...a greater feat for some as they are not native English speakers.  

    The intermediate Grammatica students have finished their last assignment, and are awaiting their final examination, while the Sermo II students are working on theirs (Hor-ten-si- a, you are working on the exam, now aren’t you?), and the Sermo I class is on its final assignment before facing the ultimate music.  The Grammatica II students have learnt the supposed terrors of the Latin subjunctive and many other joys of syntax, and in early March passed from that to the reading of actual Latin texts from Roman authors:  Caesar, Cicero, and Horace, to name a few, and have been treated to Latin idioms and Latin metrics, neither of which is addressed by their text, while the Sermo students have been learning to read, write, and speak Latin.  If you are interested in doing the same, please let me know.  We expect to offer both intermediate courses and the combined Sermo course next year, though likely only one of the other two introductory courses will run unless we can locate another instructor.   

Vale, et valete.  

 

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66027 From: L Julia Aquila Date: 2009-05-25
Subject: Re: Classic Poetry, Prose, Proems
Salvete Omnes!!!!

This hours selection is:
On a Corrupt Oligarchy.
Delivered by Caius Memmius about 110 BCE (d.100 B.C.) a Tribune of the Plebs to an assembly of the people in Rome. Reported by Sallust. Translated by John S. Watson

XXXI WERE not my zeal for the good of the state, my fellow citizens, superior to every other feeling, there are many considerations which would deter me from appearing in your cause; I allude to the power of the opposite party, your own tameness of spirit, the absence of all justice, and, above all, the fact that integrity is attended with more danger than honor. Indeed, it grieves me to relate, how, during the last fifteen years, you have been a sport to the arrogance of an oligarchy; how dishonorably, and how utterly unavenged, your defenders have perished; and how your spirit has become degenerate by sloth and indolence; for not even now, when your enemies are in your power, will you rouse yourselves to action, but continue still to stand in awe of those to whom you should be a terror. 1
Yet, notwithstanding this state of things, I feel prompted to make an attack on the power of that faction. That liberty of speech, therefore, which has been left me by my father, I shall assuredly exert against them; but whether I shall use it in vain, or for your advantage, must, my fellow citizens, depend upon yourselves. I do not, however, exhort you, as your ancestors have often done, to rise in arms against injustice. There is at present no need of violence, no need of secession; for your tyrants must work their fall by their own misconduct. 2
After the murder of Tiberius Gracchus, whom they accused of aspiring to be king, persecutions were instituted against the common people of Rome; and after the slaughter of Caius Gracchus and Marcus Fulvius, many of your order were put to death in prison. But let us leave these proceedings out of the question; let us admit that to restore their rights to the people, was to aspire to sovereignty; let us allow that what cannot be avenged without shedding the blood of citizens, was done with justice. You have seen with silent indignation, however, in past years, the treasury pillaged; you have seen kings, and free people, paying tribute to a small party of Patricians, in whose hands were both the highest honors and the greatest wealth; but to have carried on such proceedings with impunity, they now deem but a small matter; and, at last, your laws and your honor, with every civil and religious obligation, have been sacrificed for the benefit of your enemies. Nor do they, who have done these things, show either shame or contrition, but parade proudly before your faces, displaying their sacerdotal dignities, their consulships, and some of them their triumphs, as if they regarded them as marks of honor, and not as fruits of their dishonesty. Slaves, purchased with money, will not submit to unjust commands from their masters; yet you, my fellow citizens, who are born to empire, tamely endure oppression. 3
But who are these, that have thus taken the government into their hands? Men of the most abandoned character, of blood-stained hands, of insatiable avarice, of enormous guilt, and of matchless pride; men by whom integrity, reputation, public spirit, and indeed everything, whether honorable or dishonorable, is converted to a means of gain. Some of them make it their defense that they have killed tribunes of the people; others, that they have instituted unjust prosecutions; others, that they have shed your blood; and thus, the more atrocities each has committed, the greater is his security; while your oppressors, whom the same desires, the same aversions, and the same fears, combine in strict union (a union which among good men is friendship, but among the bad confederacy in guilt), have excited in you, through your want of spirit, that terror which they ought to feel for their own crimes. 4
But if your concern to preserve your liberty were as great as their ardor to increase their power of oppression, the state would not be distracted as it is at present; and the marks of favor which proceed from you, would be conferred, not on the most shameless, but on the most deserving. Your forefathers, in order to assert their rights and establish their authority, twice seceded in arms to Mount Aventine; and will not you exert yourselves, to the utmost of your power, in defense of that liberty which you received from them? Will you not display so much the more spirit in the cause, from the reflection that it is a greater disgrace to lose what has been gained, than not to have gained it at all? 5
But some will ask me, "What course of conduct, then, would you advise us to pursue?" I would advise you to inflict punishment on those who have sacrificed the interests of their country to the enemy; not, indeed, by arms or any violence (which would be more unbecoming, however, for you to inflict than for them to suffer), but by prosecutions, and by the evidence of Jugurtha himself, who, if he has really surrendered, will doubtless obey your summons; whereas, if he shows contempt for it, you will at once judge what sort of a peace or surrender it is, from which springs impunity to Jugurtha for his crimes, immense wealth to a few men in power, and loss and infamy to the republic. 6
But perhaps you are not yet weary of the tyranny of these men; perhaps these times please you less than those when kingdoms, provinces, laws, rights the administration of justice, war and peace, and indeed everything civil and religious, was in the hands of an oligarchy; while you—that is, the people of Rome—tho unconquered by foreign enemies, and rulers of all nations around, were content with being allowed to live: for which of you had spirit to throw off your slavery? For myself, indeed, tho I think it most disgraceful to receive an injury without resenting it, yet I could easily allow you to pardon these basest of traitors, because they are your fellow citizens, were it not certain that your indulgence would end in your destruction. For such is their presumption, that to escape punishment for their misdeeds will have but little effect upon them, unless they be deprived, at the same time, of the power of doing mischief; and endless anxiety will remain for you, if you shall have to reflect that you must either be slaves or preserve your liberty by force of arms. 7
Of mutual trust, or concord, what hope is there? They wish to be lords, you desire to be free; they seek to inflict injury, you to repel it; they treat your allies as enemies, your enemies as allies. With feelings so opposite, can peace or friendship subsist between you? I warn, therefore, and exhort you, not to allow such enormous dishonesty to go unpunished. It is not an embezzlement of the public money that has been committed; nor is it a forcible extortion of money from your allies—offenses which, tho great, are now, from their frequency, considered as nothing; but the authority of the senate, and your own power, have been sacrificed to the bitterest of enemies, and the public interest has been betrayed for money, both at home and abroad; and unless these misdeeds be investigated, and punishment be inflicted on the guilty, what remains for us but to live the slaves of those who committed them? For those who do what they will with impunity are undoubtedly kings. 8
I do not, however, wish to encourage you, O Romans, to be better satisfied at finding your fellow citizens guilty than innocent, but merely to warn you not to bring ruin on the good, by suffering the bad to escape. It is far better, in any government, to be unmindful of a service than of an injury; for a good man, if neglected, only becomes less active, but a bad man, more daring. Besides, if the crimes of the wicked are suppressed, the state will seldom need extraordinary support from the virtuous. 9


XXXI. "Multa me dehortantur a vobis, Quirites, ni studium reipublicae omnia superet, opes factionis, vestra patientia, ius nullum, ac maxime, quod innocentiae plus periculi quam honoris est. Nam illa quidem piget dicere, his annis quindecim quam ludibrio fueritis superbiae paucorum; quam foede quamque inulti perierint vestri defensores; ut vobis animus ab ignavia atque socordia corruptus sit, qui ne nunc quidem, obnoxiis inimicis, exsurgitis, atque etiam nunc timetis eos, quibus vos decet terrori esse. Sed quamquam haec talia sunt, tamen obviam ire factionis potentiae animus subigit. Certe ego libertatem, quae mihi a parente tradita est, experiar: verum id frustra an ob rem faciam, in vestra manu situm est, Quirites. Neque ego vos hortor, quod saepe maiores vestri fecere, uti contra iniurias armati eatis. Nihil vi, nihil secessione opus est: necesse est, suomet ipsi more praecipites eant. Occiso Tiberio Graccho, quem regnum parare aiebant, in plebem Romanam quaestiones habitae sunt. Post C. Gracchi et M. Fulvii caedem, item vestri ordinis multi mortales in carcere necati sunt: utriusque cladis non lex, verum libido eorum finem fecit. Sed sane fuerit regni paratio plebi sua restituere: quidquid sine sanguine civium ulcisci nequitur, iure factum sit. Superioribus annis taciti indignabamini aerarium expilari, reges et populos liberos paucis nobilibus vectigal pendere, penes eosdem et summam gloriam, et maximas divitias esse: tamen haec talia facinora impune suscepisse parum habuere, itaque postremo leges, maiestas vestra, divina et humana omnia hostibus tradita sunt. Neque eos, qui ea fecere, pudet aut poenitet, sed incedunt per ora vestra magnifici, sacerdotia et consulatus, pars triumphos suos ostentantes, perinde quasi ea honori, non praedae habeant. Servi aere parati imperia iniusta dominorum non perferunt: vos, Quirites, imperio nati, aequo animo servitutem toleratis? At qui sunt hi, qui rempublicam occupavere? Homines sceleratissimi, cruentis manibus, immani avaritia, nocentissimi iidemque superbissimi; quis fides, decus, pietas, postremo honesta atque inhonesta, omnia quaestui sunt. Pars eorum occidisse tribunos plebis, alii quaestiones iniustas, plerique caedem in vos fecisse pro munimento habent. Ita quam quisque pessime fecit, tam maxime tutus est; metum a scelere suo ad ignaviam vestram transtulere: quos omnes eadem cupere, eadem odisse, eadem metuere in unum coegit: sed haec inter bonos amicitia, inter malos factio est. Quod si tam vos libertatis curam haberetis, quam illi ad dominationem accensi sunt, profecto neque respublica, sicuti nunc, vastaretur, et beneficia vestra penes optimos, non audacissimos forent. Maiores vestri parandi iuris et maiestatis constituendae gratia bis per secessionem armati Aventinum occupavere: vos pro libertate, quam ab illis accepistis, non summa ope nitemini? atque eo vehementius, quod maius dedecus est parta amittere, quam omnino non paravisse. Dicet aliquis: "Quid igitur censes?" Vindicandum in eos, qui hosti prodidere rempublicam; non manu neque vi, quod magis vos fecisse quam illis accidisse indignum est, verum quaestionibus et indicio ipsius Iugurthae, qui si dedititius est, profecto iussis vestris obediens erit; sin ea contemnit, scilicet existimabitis qualis illa pax aut deditio sit, ex qua ad Iugurtham scelerum impunitas, ad paucos potentes maximae divitiae, in rempublicam damna atque dedecora pervenerint. Nisi forte nondum etiam vos dominationis eorum satietas tenet, et illa quam haec tempora magis placent, quum regna, provinciae, leges, iura, iudicia, bella, atque, paces, postremo divina et humana omnia penes paucos erant; vos autem, hoc est populus Romanus, invicti ab hostibus, imperatores omnium gentium, satis habebatis animam retinere; nam servitutem quidem quis vestrum recusare audebat? Atque ego, tametsi flagitiosissimum existimo impune iniuriam accepisse, tamen vos hominibus sceleratissimis ignoscere, quoniam cives sunt, aequo animo paterer, nisi misericordia in perniciem casura esset. Nam et illis, quantum importunitatis habent, parum est impune male fecisse, nisi deinde faciendi licentia eripitur, et vobis aeterna sollicitudo remanebit, quum intelligetis aut serviendum esse, aut per manus libertatem retinendam. Nam fidei quidem aut concordiae quae spes est? Dominari illi volunt, vos liberi esse; facere illi iniurias, vos prohibere; postremo sociis vestris veluti hostibus, hostibus pro sociis utuntur. Potestne in tam diversis mentibus pax aut amicitia esse? Quare moneo hortorque vos, ne tantum scelus impunitum omittatis. Non peculatus aerarii factus est, neque per vim sociis ereptae pecuniae; quae quamquam gravia sunt, tamen consuetudine iam pro nihilo habentur: hosti acerrimo prodita senati auctoritas, proditum imperium vestrum; domi militiaeque respublica venalis fuit. Quae nisi quaesita erunt, ni vindicatum in noxios, quid erit reliquum, nisi ut illis, qui ea fecere, obedientes vivamus? nam impune quaelibet facere, id est regem esse. Neque ego vos, Quirites, hortor, ut malitis cives vestros perperam quam recte fecisse, sed ne ignoscendo malis bonos perditum eatis. Ad hoc in republica multo praestat beneficii quam maleficii immemorem esse; bonus tantummodo segnior fit, ubi negligas, at malus improbior. Ad hoc si iniuriae non sint, haud saepe auxilii egeas."

Caius Memmius (d.100 B.C.)
Born in — B.C., died in 100; Tribune of the Plebs in 111; vigorously opposed the oligarchical party during the war with Jugurtha, and by exposing corruption, opened the way to command of the army by Marius; while a candidate for Consul in 100, slain by a mob armed with bludgeons


Valete,
Julia
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66028 From: Matt Hucke Date: 2009-05-25
Subject: Re: chat
that's obsolete though; I don't run an IRC server on hastur (where
irc.novaroma.org points to) anymore.

>
> Salvete
> FYI
>> From the NR Wiki
> IRC chat
> Each Market Day, all citizens are invited to the IRC chat sessions. While this service is available at any time, it is hoped that by choosing a particular time, more people will participate then, and a large number of people can be encountered at once.
>
> There are two recommended times to participate on Market Days:
>
>
> 7 PM (19:00) Roman Time (GMT + 1) Find your local time
> 7 PM (19:00) US/Central (GMT - 6; 8 PM Eastern, 5 PM Pacific) Find your local time
> To join the chat, download an IRC client and go to the URL irc://irc.novaroma.org/NovaRoma . Further details about the software, the channel, and setting your name can be found at the IRC (Nova Roma) article.
>
>
>
>
>
> Valete
>
>
>
> Paulinus
>
>
>
> To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> From: shoshanahathaway@...
> Date: Mon, 25 May 2009 12:02:00 -0400
> Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: our untapped resource
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> salvete omnes,
>
> OK, I inadvertently provided some incorrect information, which I will now correct, with apologies.
>
> The chat room is private, however, the owner of it allows the Aedils to operate it. any citizen can use it, at any time, and I have many totally apolitical, enjoyable, informal conversations there. It will be what the people who use it make of it, but if citizens would feel more comfortable, perhaps NR could set up it's own official room where everyone would feel comfortable.
>
> Valete,
> C. Maria Caeca
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

--
Matt Hucke (hucke@...), programmer.
author, Graveyards of Illinois - http://graveyards.com/
CYNICO.NET - hosting from $8.33/month; domains $13 - http://cynico.net/
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66029 From: violetphearsen@yahoo.com Date: 2009-05-25
Subject: Oath of Office
"I, Maxima Valeria Messallina (Violet Phearsen), do hereby solemnly swear to uphold the honor of Nova Roma, and to act always in the best interests of the people and the Senate of Nova Roma.
 
As a magistrate of Nova Roma, I, Maxima Valeria Messallina, swear to honor the Gods and Goddesses of Rome in my public dealings, and to pursue the Roman Virtues in my public and private life.
 
I, Maxima Valeria Messallina swear to uphold and defend the Religio Romana as the State Religion of Nova Roma and swear never to act in a way that would threaten its status as the State Religion.
 
I, Maxima Valeria Messallina swear to protect and defend the Constitution of Nova Roma.
 
I, Maxima Valeria Messallina further swear to fulfill the obligations and responsibilities of the office of diribitrix suffecta to the best of my abilities.
 
On my honor as a Citizen of Nova Roma, and in the presence of the Gods and Goddesses of the Roman people and by their will and favor, do I accept the position of diribitrix suffecta with all the rights, privileges, obligations, and responsibilities attendant thereto."

    
Ego, Maxima Valeria Messallina, hac re ipsa decus Novae Romae me defensuram, et semper pro populo senatuque Novae Romae acturam esse sollemniter IVRO.
 
Ego, Maxima Valeria Messallina, officio diribitricis suffectae Novae Romae accepto, deos deasque Romae in omnibus meae vitae publicae temporibus culturam, et virtutes Romanas publica privataque vita me persecuturam esse IVRO.      
 
Ego, Maxima Valeria Messallina, Religioni Romanae me fauturam et eam defensuram, et numquam contra eius statum publicum me acturam esse, ne quid detrimenti capiat IVRO.
 
Ego, Maxima Valeria Messallina, officiis muneris diribitricis suffectae me quam optime functuram esse praeterea IVRO.
 
Meo civis Novae Romae honore, coram deis deabusque populi Romani, et voluntate favoreque eorum, ego munus diribitricis suffectae una cum iuribus, privilegiis, muneribus et officiis comitantibus ACCIPIO. 
 
 
 
Maxima Valeria Messallina
Sacerdos Vestalis 

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66030 From: Timothy or Stephen Gallagher Date: 2009-05-25
Subject: Pericles Funeral Oration
Salvete
 
I thought this would be appropriate for this weekend
 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2UJLXKlkvlM
 
Valete
 
Tiberius Galerius Paulinus
 
 
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66031 From: C. Maria Caeca Date: 2009-05-25
Subject: Re: Pericles Funeral Oration
How very beautiful, thank you.
 
C. Maria Caeca
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66032 From: livia_plauta Date: 2009-05-25
Subject: Re: Sulla's Teaching Skills
Salve Sulla,
forgive my ignorance, but it's the second time you write it this way, so I have to ask. Is a "Comptroller" something different from a controller?
Is it by chance a compound word formed by "computer" and "troll", which means somebody who trolls by use of a computer?

Vale,
Livia

>
> Would you please list my title correctly. I am not JUST an accountant. I am the Comptroller of the construction company. The title on my business card says Comptroller. :)
>
> Essentially I run the office and am empowered to sign contracts, change orders. Deal with retention related issues (construction terminology). I also deal with AR/AP, HR, Benefits analysis, filing the 940s, 941s, 1120s, making sure our annual report is filed yearly. Legal issues ranging from collections, filing and enforcing liens, going after bonds, suing contractors for non-payment. Insurance related matters (workers comp, general liability, commercial umbrella policies) as well as medical, dental and vision insurance for our employees. I also coordinate with our foremen to make sure they conduct safety meetings, prepare billings for our contractors.
>
> Thank you for trying to diminish my duties and responsibilities. I have been at this job just over 4 years. (I was hired on my B-day May 8th). My iPhone and my previous blackberry allows me the ability to be online ANYWHERE. :) Just like when I was in Israel I was in constant contact with my jobs. And, was able to teach and grade papers while I was out of the country.
>
> Vale,
>
> Sulla
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "L Julia Aquila" <dis_pensible@> wrote:
> >
> > Salve Equestria,
> >
> > >That is a remarkably diverse mix of classes and quite impressive. You
> > >must have at least a few degrees and certificates (PhD, MBA, CPA,
> > >etc.) especially to be a confirmed full-time faculty in this job >market.
> >
> > You forgot to mention that Sulla has another job as an accountant for a construction company. He is a jack of all trades, master of none I suppose. However does he have the time with his fingers glued to his i-phone or kb. Wonders never cease!
> > Now that's funnah!
> >
> > Vale,
> > Julia
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66033 From: David Kling Date: 2009-05-25
Subject: Re: Sulla's Teaching Skills
LOL.  I about lost my coffee when reading that.  CompTROLLer.  Too funny.

Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus

On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 3:38 PM, livia_plauta <livia.plauta@...> wrote:


Salve Sulla,
forgive my ignorance, but it's the second time you write it this way, so I have to ask. Is a "Comptroller" something different from a controller?
Is it by chance a compound word formed by "computer" and "troll", which means somebody who trolls by use of a computer?

Vale,
Livia




Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66034 From: Publius Ullerius Stephanus Venator Date: 2009-05-25
Subject: Re: Pericles Funeral Oration
Ave Paulinus;

On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 1:57 PM, Timothy or Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>
> Salvete
>
> I thought this would be appropriate for this weekend
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2UJLXKlkvlM
>
> Valete
>
> Tiberius Galerius Paulinus
>

Thank you for showing this to me, and reminding me of my early
admiration of Pericles.

Here is the full text, in English translation:
http://www.wsu.edu/~dee/GREECE/PERICLES.HTM

Benedicte - Venator
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66035 From: Maior Date: 2009-05-25
Subject: Re: A dream come true
Salve Livia;
I am bowled over, that must have been so amazing! I'm labouring over my Latin final exam and you've cheered me up with this reality of Living Latin. I promise to join you when you next meet!
optime vale,
Maior defatigans;-)
>
> I posted this in the Latinitas list, but then I realized that I'd better post it here too, because at least one good friend of mine is still banned from that list.
> More reports about Floralia are forthcoming.
>
> L. Livia Plauta omnibus sodalibus S.P:D.
>
> Over the weekend, as we announced on many lists already, we Novi Romani from Pannonia had a big role in the Floralia festival at the Aquincum Museum here in Budapest.
> We held a big sacrifice to various gods in honour of the two-thousandth anniversary of the creation of Pannonia, we held a roman fashion show, we demonstrated how a roman marriage by confarreatio and a trial took place.
>
> We had guests from three countries: Sex. Lucilius Tutor and his girlfriend from the Czech Republic, A. Apollonius Cordus from London, and C. Petronius Dexter from Paris.
>
> The good news is that four of us: A. Apollonius Cordus, C. Petronius Dexter, Cn. Cornelius Lentulus and myself were able to speak Latin for hours on end, at the festival location, at the restaurant, and at my place.
> I knew the three men I mentioned are all excellent latinists, and I had no doubt they could speak Latin fluently, but the biggest surprise for me came from myself. I didn't consider myself latine loquens, so I was quite surprised when I found myself speaking Latin, with mistakes, of course, and having to ask help for words or phrases, but for hours, and on every sort of topic.
> I think the biggest merit goes to Cordus, who is so dedicated to living latin that he answers in latin even when addressed in English.
>
> Anyway one of my biggest dreams came true this weekend, the dream of being able to learn Latin the way living languages are usually learned, by interaction with a community of speakers, by trial and error, in connection with everyday situations.
>
> This demonstrates that the goals Avitus and Scholastica pursue, of having a community that speaks Latin naturally, as a means of communication, is actually reachable in reality and within Nova Roma.
>
> All of us (the four people mentioned above) made a vow to meet again as soon as possible in the future and continue speaking Latin, as we had such a wonderful time together.
>
> I now have to consider myself latine loquens, but unfortunately I'm not latine scribens yet.
> That's why I'm writing this here and not to the Nova Roma latina mailing list.
> I realized I'm much more shy in writing, and I don't dare see my mistakes in black on white, so for the moment the situation with my Latin is similar to that of my French: I can talk but not write.
> So far, my spoken French is still way better than my Latin, but I hope that will change soon.
>
> Optime valete,
> Livia
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66036 From: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com Date: 2009-05-25
Subject: Comitia Centuriata Election, 5/25/2009, 11:00 pm
Reminder from:   Nova-Roma Yahoo! Group
 
Title:   Comitia Centuriata Election
 
Date:   Monday May 25, 2009
Time:   11:00 pm - 12:00 am
Repeats:   This event repeats every day until Monday May 25, 2009.
Next reminder:   The next reminder for this event will be sent in 13 minutes.
Notes:   The Comitia Centuriata election will follow this schedule:

* 07:00 hrs CET 25 May: Voting by the Centuria Praerogativa alone begins.
* 07:00 hrs CET 27 May: Diribitores capture tally of Centuria Praerogativa.
* 07:00 hrs CET 27 May: Voting by all First Class centuries now permitted.
* 07:00 hrs CET 30 May: Diribitores capture tally of all First Class centuries.
* 07:00 hrs CET 30 May: Voting by all centuries now permitted.
* 17:00 hrs CET 3 June: All voting ends.
 
Copyright © 2009  Yahoo! Inc. All Rights Reserved | Terms of Service | Privacy Policy
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66037 From: livia_plauta Date: 2009-05-25
Subject: Re: our untapped resource
Salve Semproni,
the bikini has been an object of my researches. I have a dyed piece of wool which will become a roman bikini for this summer, so In a few months I should be able to let everyone know if a wool bikini is viable or whether it should be leather.

The top part should be a mammillare. According to A. T. Croom (Roman Clothing and Fashion, 2000) attempts to recreate this breastband show that it has to be at least 7 metres long in order not to fall off during use.
However, I think a mere wrapped band would still risk falling off during sports, and the top on the "bikini girls" doesn't look as if it was wrapped around multiple times. I have figured a way to make an invisible fastening, that from far away will give the impression that the top is in one piece, while making only one layer necessary.

I'm pretty sure that the roman bikini was not the ancestor to the modern bikini. It took 16-18 centuries before this comfortable bathing attire was reinvented from scratch.

Vale,
Livia



>
> There are Roman mosaics or paintings where women are dressed in swimming and gymn attire. It looks exactly like a bikini. The picture I have in mind has two women dressed in these black bikini things tossing what loooks like a medicine ball. There is other exercise equipment stuff around. Off to one corner, another woman in the same black bikini thing is seating with her legs in a pool-bath?
>  
> At one point, I was actually going to look up whether this Roman "bikini" was actually the ancestor to the modern bikini. But I never got around to it..
>
>
>
>
>  
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66038 From: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com Date: 2009-05-25
Subject: Comitia Centuriata Election, 5/25/2009, 11:00 pm
Reminder from:   Nova-Roma Yahoo! Group
 
Title:   Comitia Centuriata Election
 
Date:   Monday May 25, 2009
Time:   11:00 pm - 12:00 am
Repeats:   This event repeats every day until Monday May 25, 2009.
Notes:   The Comitia Centuriata election will follow this schedule:

* 07:00 hrs CET 25 May: Voting by the Centuria Praerogativa alone begins.
* 07:00 hrs CET 27 May: Diribitores capture tally of Centuria Praerogativa.
* 07:00 hrs CET 27 May: Voting by all First Class centuries now permitted.
* 07:00 hrs CET 30 May: Diribitores capture tally of all First Class centuries.
* 07:00 hrs CET 30 May: Voting by all centuries now permitted.
* 17:00 hrs CET 3 June: All voting ends.
 
Copyright © 2009  Yahoo! Inc. All Rights Reserved | Terms of Service | Privacy Policy
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66039 From: livia_plauta Date: 2009-05-25
Subject: Re: our untapped resource
I didn't see any sex room in the baths of Pompeii and Herculaneum. However they were pretty spartan baths. I guess this sort of room would not be indicated in the archaeological area maps, though. But it needs to be a room with space for a bed.

>
> There were separate baths and some co-ed one of my books claims. The baths were actually like our modern shopping malls -- besides baths, they art shops, art galleries, cafes, and something you would not find in our malls -- rooms for sex. I find it a deep
> source of bemused irony that the basilica, which was the type of bulding these baths-malls-and sex rooms were housed, became the model of the Christian church because they did not want to "contaminate" their buidings by modelling them after a Roman temple.
>
> --- On Sun, 5/24/09, L Julia Aquila <dis_pensible@...> wrote:
>
>
> From: L Julia Aquila <dis_pensible@...>
> Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: our untapped resource
> To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> Date: Sunday, May 24, 2009, 7:05 PM
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Iulia Mariae Semproni S.P.D.
>
> Sounds good to me also.
> But allow me to play the devil's advocate here, something I nevvverrrr do, *laugh* and ask a question.
> This is not going to be historically accurate so it would be a co-ed Roman bath, correct? This I might attend from time to time;)
>
> Valete,
> Julia
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com, "A. Sempronius Regulus" <asempronius. regulus@ ..> wrote:
> >
> > Sigh! Why couldn't it be a Roman Bath?
> >
> > --- On Sat, 5/23/09, L Julia Aquila <dis_pensible@ ...> wrote:
> >
> >
> > From: L Julia Aquila <dis_pensible@ ...>
> > Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: our untapped resource
> > To: Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com
> > Date: Saturday, May 23, 2009, 6:37 PM
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Salve Mariae,
> >
> > Thank you for this information.
> >
> > Vale optime,
> > Julia
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66040 From: Gaius Petronius Dexter Date: 2009-05-25
Subject: Sulla's rebuttal - Re: Nova-Roma is life
C. Petronius L. Sullae s.p.d.,

> NR is your life? Seriously? NR is your life? So what would happen if NR ceased to exist? Would the purpose of your life be snuffed out and you would have no reason to live?
>
> Is that point of view really healthy? This is a voluntary internet corporation and you place it with such importance that it is YOUR LIFE?

It is more than an internet corporation, Sulla. I came back today from Aquincum where I was three days with nova Roman citizens, real and living. I spoke Latin with Lentulus, Cordus and Livia. We made many things for Nova Roma in real life in Budapest/Aquincum.

Above all we performed the sacra of the Floralia with true dutifulness and faith. The audience at the ceremony in this Sunday were certainly most important than the audience at the same time to the mass at Paris in Notre Dame.

Vale.
C. Petronius Dexter
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66041 From: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com Date: 2009-05-25
Subject: Posting rules in this Forum, 5/25/2009, 11:45 pm
Reminder from:   Nova-Roma Yahoo! Group
 
Title:   Posting rules in this Forum
 
Date:   Monday May 25, 2009
Time:   11:45 pm - 12:00 am
Repeats:   This event repeats every week until Friday January 1, 2010.
Location:   Rome
Notes:   Praetores omnibus s.d.

Please keep on mind the posting rules defined in the current Edictum de sermone Apr. 24, 2762 GEM-PMA, that you find in the Files section of this Forum, at:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma/files/Edicta%20de%20sermone/

Valete omnes,


Praetores G.E.Marinus and P.M.Albucius
 
Copyright © 2009  Yahoo! Inc. All Rights Reserved | Terms of Service | Privacy Policy
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66042 From: galerius_of_rome Date: 2009-05-25
Subject: Âñïîìèíàþù óïàäåííîå
Ñåãîäíÿ â Ñîåäèíåííûå Øòàòû ìû óäîñòîèì è âñïîìèíàåì âñå èç íàøèõ âîèñê ñòðàí êîòîðûå ïîæåðòâîâàëè èõ æèçíè äëÿ èõ ñòðàíû. ß æåëàþ ðàñøèðèòü íàøè ìûñëè ê âñåì òåì êîòîðûõ ïîòåðÿéòå èõ æèçíè äëÿ è óïàäèòå äëÿ Sarmatia òàêæå. Ìàé èõ ïîääà÷è íå íàõîäèòüñÿ â òùåòíîì.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66043 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2009-05-25
Subject: Re: A dream come true
Re: [Nova-Roma] A dream come true
A. Tullia Scholastica L. Liviae Plautae quiritibus, sociis, peregrinisque bonae voluntatis S.P.D.
  

  

I posted this in the Latinitas list, but then I realized that I'd better post it here too, because at least one good friend of mine is still banned from that list.

    ATS:  There is very good reason to post this on the ML quite independent of said situation.  This deserves a far wider audience.  Moreover, if said party can behave herself, she might be readmitted.  

More reports about Floralia are forthcoming.

L. Livia Plauta omnibus sodalibus S.P:D.

Over the weekend, as we announced on many lists already, we Novi Romani from Pannonia had a big role in the Floralia festival at the Aquincum Museum here in Budapest.
We held a big sacrifice to various gods in honour of the two-thousandth anniversary of the creation of Pannonia, we held a roman fashion show, we demonstrated how a roman marriage by confarreatio and a trial took place.

We had guests from three countries: Sex. Lucilius Tutor and his girlfriend from the Czech Republic, A. Apollonius Cordus from London, and C. Petronius Dexter from Paris.

The good news is that four of us: A. Apollonius Cordus, C. Petronius Dexter, Cn. Cornelius Lentulus and myself were able to speak Latin for hours on end, at the festival location, at the restaurant, and at my place.
I knew the three men I mentioned are all excellent latinists, and I had no doubt they could speak Latin fluently, but the biggest surprise for me came from myself. I didn't consider myself latine loquens, so I was quite surprised when I found myself speaking Latin, with mistakes, of course, and having to ask help for words or phrases, but for hours, and on every sort of topic.

    ATS: See, you might surprise even yourself on these matters.  Take Sermo next year...


I think the biggest merit goes to Cordus, who is so dedicated to living latin that he answers in latin even when addressed in English.

    ATS:  Indeed, he is a fine Latinist, and it is wonderful to see him becoming a bit more active in NR once again.  

Anyway one of my biggest dreams came true this weekend, the dream of being able to learn Latin the way living languages are usually learned, by interaction with a community of speakers, by trial and error, in connection with everyday situations.

This demonstrates that the goals Avitus and Scholastica pursue, of having a community that speaks Latin naturally, as a means of communication, is actually reachable in reality and within Nova Roma.

    ATS:  Indeed.  I spoke Latin daily with Cordus, Amatius Paulus, and Astur at Conventus V in Britannia, though apparently less extensively than you did.  Cordus should have some recordings, at least some of which were supposed to be included in a podcast which never was produced.  I have also participated in an entire week of spoken Latin at Latin immersion in Seattle.  There are numerous immersion experiences every summer in several European locations and some in the US (Seattle/Wenatchee, Lexington, KY, and Rusticatio Virginiana, which has one week for advanced speakers and one for beginners).  I believe there are some in California and elsewhere as well.  I heartily recommend these to anyone who wishes to learn modern, spoken, living Latin.  There were beginners at the conventiculum I attended, and I understand that there was a 12 or 14 year old the next year, so one should not be afraid that one will make mistakes.  The moderator of the Seattle one is very kind, generous, and tolerant, and never criticized anyone for errors.  

All of us (the four people mentioned above) made a vow to meet again as soon as possible in the future and continue speaking Latin, as we had such a wonderful time together.

I now have to consider myself latine loquens, but unfortunately I'm not latine scribens yet.
That's why I'm writing this here and not to the Nova Roma latina mailing list.

    ATS:  Surely you don’t think that everyone there is perfect?  Only our deity approaches that, but he admits to errors and is much more modest than one might assume.  He has also had to leave even that list, as Lentulus may have informed you.  

I realized I'm much more shy in writing, and I don't dare see my mistakes in black on white, so for the moment the situation with my Latin is similar to that of my French: I can talk but not write.

    ATS:  I have seen errors in Latin on another list you frequent, where most do not know Latin...

So far, my spoken French is still way better than my Latin, but I hope that will change soon.

    ATS:  Let us hope that it is not to the detriment of your spoken French!  I would like more practice in that, too.  Perhaps you are too shy on this matter...

Optime valete,
Livia

  Vale, et valete.  
    

     
   Messages in this topic           <http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma/message/66011
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66044 From: Lucius Cornelius Cicero Date: 2009-05-25
Subject: Re: MY SUPPORT FOR K. FABIUS BUTEO MODIANUS
Ever heard of a joke, you two? Guess not. Despicable the way you'll try and turn anything into something that can be used for political advantage.

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, David Kling <tau.athanasios@...> wrote:
>
> Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus Quintae Fabiae Drusillae salutem dicit
>
> I too am now a Fabia and Quintus Fabius Maximus is NOT my pater familias.
> He is not your pater familias either, and his insinuation that he is
> acknowledges he has no understanding of the gens reform of several years
> ago.
>
> Again I appreciate your support.
>
> Vale;
>
> Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus
>
> On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 3:36 AM, fabiadrusilla <fabiadrusilla@...>wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com <Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com>,
> > QFabiusMaxmi@ wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > No he's not. His term would be illegal. Now go to your room!
> > >
> > > Q. Fabius Maximus
> > > Paterfamilius
> > >
> >
> > Why should I go to my room? Go you! What? Just men can say in this list?
> >
> > Is this what Nova Roman women can expect if we allow Equitius Cato is
> > elected?
> >
> > Fabio Maximo, really your message is a sexist insult.
> >
> > Vale
> >
> > Quinta Fabia Drusilla
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66045 From: Q. Valerius Poplicola Date: 2009-05-25
Subject: Re: our untapped resource
You sure do love twisting the truth, don't you? I and other witnesses were there. You were moderated because you joined and immediately started trolling. You were removed from moderation a minute later and have kept your cool for the most part and thus have avoided moderation. You've been there for days and apart from when you first started causing trouble, no one has done anything to you.

Poplicola

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "lathyrus77" <lathyrus77@...> wrote:
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "C. Maria Caeca" <shoshanahathaway@> wrote:
> >
>
> > You can find and download the IRC software which is called Mirc by simply
> > doing a Google search on the term Mirc. Once you have done so and installed
> > it, simply go to IRC.freenode.net and then type /join #NovaRoma. That's it.
> > Believe me, if *I* could do it, anyone on this list (or a 4 year old who has
> > never touched a computer before, can).
> >
> > Valete Bene,
> > C. Maria Caeca
> >
>
>
> Except it's run by the BA rats, so unless you're on good terms with those trolls, they'll stop you from participating.
>
> I was muted within 3 minutes.
>
> -Anna
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66046 From: Charlie Collins Date: 2009-05-25
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Âñïîìèíàþù óïàäåííîå
Salve,

What????

Vale,
Quintus Servilius Priscus

2009/5/25 galerius_of_rome <galerius_of_rome@...>:
> Ñåãîäíÿ â Ñîåäèíåííûå Øòàòû ìû óäîñòîèì è âñïîìèíàåì âñå èç íàøèõ âîèñê ñòðàí êîòîðûå ïîæåðòâîâàëè èõ æèçíè äëÿ èõ ñòðàíû. ß æåëàþ ðàñøèðèòü íàøè ìûñëè ê âñåì òåì êîòîðûõ ïîòåðÿéòå èõ æèçíè äëÿ è óïàäèòå äëÿ Sarmatia òàêæå. Ìàé èõ ïîääà÷è íå íàõîäèòüñÿ â òùåòíîì.
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>



--
Deism: A Non-Prophet Religion
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66047 From: C. Maria Caeca Date: 2009-05-25
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Âñïîìèíàþù óïàäåííîå
Microsoft's version of Cyrillic?

Caeca
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66048 From: Q. Valerius Poplicola Date: 2009-05-25
Subject: Re: MY SUPPORT FOR K. FABIUS BUTEO MODIANUS
On the upside, Modianus let it out that he's a girl now.

I quote:

> > I too am now a Fabia and Quintus Fabius Maximus is NOT my pater familias.

Looks like Aeternia's comment about Modianus, er I mean Modiana needing midol was spot on.

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Lucius Cornelius Cicero" <Cicero@...> wrote:
>
> Ever heard of a joke, you two? Guess not. Despicable the way you'll try and turn anything into something that can be used for political advantage.
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, David Kling <tau.athanasios@> wrote:
> >
> > Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus Quintae Fabiae Drusillae salutem dicit
> >
> > I too am now a Fabia and Quintus Fabius Maximus is NOT my pater familias.
> > He is not your pater familias either, and his insinuation that he is
> > acknowledges he has no understanding of the gens reform of several years
> > ago.
> >
> > Again I appreciate your support.
> >
> > Vale;
> >
> > Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus
> >
> > On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 3:36 AM, fabiadrusilla <fabiadrusilla@>wrote:
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com <Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com>,
> > > QFabiusMaxmi@ wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > No he's not. His term would be illegal. Now go to your room!
> > > >
> > > > Q. Fabius Maximus
> > > > Paterfamilius
> > > >
> > >
> > > Why should I go to my room? Go you! What? Just men can say in this list?
> > >
> > > Is this what Nova Roman women can expect if we allow Equitius Cato is
> > > elected?
> > >
> > > Fabio Maximo, really your message is a sexist insult.
> > >
> > > Vale
> > >
> > > Quinta Fabia Drusilla
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66049 From: Q. Valerius Poplicola Date: 2009-05-25
Subject: Re: our untapped resource
Many different kinds of cives come through, and some non-cives. Maior can attest to how civil the room is when one isn't acting like a troll *cough*Annathenoncivis*cough*.

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "L Julia Aquila" <dis_pensible@...> wrote:
>
> Salve Mariae Caecae,
>
> Thank you for the correction, that was what I thought originally - that the irc chat is private.
> Citizens might be more comfortable in an official Nova Roma chatroom so i believe that would be a good option.
>
> Vale,
> Julia
>
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "C. Maria Caeca" <shoshanahathaway@> wrote:
> >
> > salvete omnes,
> >
> > OK, I inadvertently provided some incorrect information, which I will now correct, with apologies.
> >
> > The chat room is private, however, the owner of it allows the Aedils to operate it. any citizen can use it, at any time, and I have many totally apolitical, enjoyable, informal conversations there. It will be what the people who use it make of it, but if citizens would feel more comfortable, perhaps NR could set up it's own official room where everyone would feel comfortable.
> >
> > Valete,
> > C. Maria Caeca
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66050 From: lathyrus77 Date: 2009-05-25
Subject: Re: our untapped resource
--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Q. Valerius Poplicola" <q.valerius.poplicola@...> wrote:
>
> You sure do love twisting the truth, don't you? I and other witnesses were there. You were moderated because you joined and immediately started trolling. You were removed from moderation a minute later and have kept your cool for the most part and thus have avoided moderation. You've been there for days and apart from when you first started causing trouble, no one has done anything to you.
>


No I was muted by metellus because he thought I was a troll on account of you and sulla telling him I'm a neo-nazi troll. He spoke with me after and realized he made a mistake. I made that post when I got muted.

The only thing I said when I first signed on was "Of course sulla is here". and "I'm not a neo nazi" and "I'm not a troll", etc. I'm praraphrasing of course, I don't have the saved logs from the chat.

So, how is anything I said trolling?

And the fact that I haven't been muted since indicates I'm not a troll at all, despite being called "stupid", "idiot", and "retarded", because I disagree on the "consecutive" issue.

Good job troll.

-Anna
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66051 From: Robert Levee Date: 2009-05-25
Subject: Remembering The Fallen!
Salve,

This message is to extend the rememberance of the fallen military here and in Sarmatia (Russia) on this memorial day.Sorry if I have offended anyone.Thank you.

Ap.Galerius Aurelianus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66052 From: C. Maria Caeca Date: 2009-05-25
Subject: Re: Remembering The Fallen!
No offense, but Microsoft mad gibberish out of your post, if the readers
don't have the ability to read the Cyrillic as I don't, (smile). It just
came as a bit of a surprise.

C. Maria Caeca
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66053 From: Q. Valerius Poplicola Date: 2009-05-25
Subject: Re: our untapped resource
That you haven't been muted yet is solely on account of Metellus and my policy on allowing people to talk despite disagreeing with them...unlike what the Main List went through just recently.

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "lathyrus77" <lathyrus77@...> wrote:
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Q. Valerius Poplicola" <q.valerius.poplicola@> wrote:
> >
> > You sure do love twisting the truth, don't you? I and other witnesses were there. You were moderated because you joined and immediately started trolling. You were removed from moderation a minute later and have kept your cool for the most part and thus have avoided moderation. You've been there for days and apart from when you first started causing trouble, no one has done anything to you.
> >
>
>
> No I was muted by metellus because he thought I was a troll on account of you and sulla telling him I'm a neo-nazi troll. He spoke with me after and realized he made a mistake. I made that post when I got muted.
>
> The only thing I said when I first signed on was "Of course sulla is here". and "I'm not a neo nazi" and "I'm not a troll", etc. I'm praraphrasing of course, I don't have the saved logs from the chat.
>
> So, how is anything I said trolling?
>
> And the fact that I haven't been muted since indicates I'm not a troll at all, despite being called "stupid", "idiot", and "retarded", because I disagree on the "consecutive" issue.
>
> Good job troll.
>
> -Anna
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66054 From: lathyrus77 Date: 2009-05-25
Subject: Re: our untapped resource
--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Q. Valerius Poplicola" <q.valerius.poplicola@...> wrote:
>
> That you haven't been muted yet is solely on account of Metellus and my policy on allowing people to talk despite disagreeing with them...unlike what the Main List went through just recently.
>

People should still be warned what kind of people run the chatroom. I can take the insults, but most don't want to be bothered with that nonsense.

-Anna
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66055 From: M. Lucretius Agricola Date: 2009-05-25
Subject: Voting procedures reminder
Agricola omnibus S.P.D.



I would ask all citizen to read the following message completely.



Our Lex Fabia de ratione comitiorum centuriatorum says in part:

"A century from the first class shall be selected by lot by the diribitores to vote first. No century containing only one member shall be selected for this purpose. For the first 48 hours of the voting period only members of that century shall be permitted to vote."

This is the "centuria praerogativa" and the diribitores selected centuria XIV, that is, century 14, for this honor.

Since we are still within that first 48 hour period, any votes from citizens OTHER THAN centuria XIV cannot be counted.

IF YOU HAVE VOTED ALREADY, YOUR VOTE CANNOT BE COUNTED UNLESS YOU ARE IN CENTURY 14. Anyone who voted too early will be able to re-vote later, at the correct time. Not sure if you are in this century? Check here: http://www.novaroma.org/civitas/album?cmd=show-century¢ury=14

REMEMBER, Your century will have changed just before the election, so you must check your century in the Album Civium http://www.novaroma.org/civitas/album . You can simply search for yourself and read your century from your page.


Our website explains voting by centuries, and here I have added notes and broken this text down to show clearly the three phases of voting:

1. During the first forty-eight hours of voting, only [the chosen] century is permitted to vote. At the end of that time, the diribitores will announce the results of the vote as they stand from that century.

2. Next, the entire first class [that is, centuries 1 through 14, inclusive], becomes eligible to vote. At the end of this second forty-eight hours of voting the diribitores will announce the results of the entire first class.

3. Finally, all the centuries become eligible to vote, for the remainder of the voting period. At no time in this do the centuria praerogativa or the first class become ineligible to vote. They may vote from the beginning of their voting time to the end of voting.

The schedule for these three phases is posted on the election page, here: http://www.novaroma.org/nr/Election_Maius_MMDCCLXII_(Nova_Roma)



Finally, please remember to take note of your BALLOT NUMBER. Problem ballots will be announced by BALLOT NUMBER.


Thank you all for reading this and optime valete!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66056 From: Q. Valerius Poplicola Date: 2009-05-25
Subject: Re: our untapped resource
Q. Poplicola L. Aquilae:

Yes, the chatroom is private. I run it, but allow the aediles to have a hand in moderation. I do welcome differing opinions. You and I have very different political beliefs, but fortunately the same taste in antiquity - Roman! There is one fault of the room, currently it has a bad case known as Anna (lathyrus). I tolerate the outbreak, but only so much. But you can ask Maior who last time she showed up did not engage in trolling and therefore no problems were had. Fierce debate sometimes? Sure, no worse (and actually much better) than here. Anna has the sole distinction of being moderated on account of her trolling, and furthermore because she's not a civis there's much less tolerance for her.

Optime uale.

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "L Julia Aquila" <dis_pensible@...> wrote:
>
> Salve Mariae Caecae,
>
> Thank you for the correction, that was what I thought originally - that the irc chat is private.
> Citizens might be more comfortable in an official Nova Roma chatroom so i believe that would be a good option.
>
> Vale,
> Julia
>
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "C. Maria Caeca" <shoshanahathaway@> wrote:
> >
> > salvete omnes,
> >
> > OK, I inadvertently provided some incorrect information, which I will now correct, with apologies.
> >
> > The chat room is private, however, the owner of it allows the Aediles to operate it. any citizen can use it, at any time, and I have many totally apolitical, enjoyable, informal conversations there. It will be what the people who use it make of it, but if citizens would feel more comfortable, perhaps NR could set up it's own official room where everyone would feel comfortable.
> >
> > Valete,
> > C. Maria Caeca
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66057 From: lathyrus77 Date: 2009-05-25
Subject: Re: our untapped resource
--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Q. Valerius Poplicola" <q.valerius.poplicola@...> wrote:
Anna has the sole distinction of being moderated on account of her trolling, and furthermore because she's not a civis there's much less tolerance for her.
>


I wasn't moderated for trolling. Metellus apologized for muting me and said he had been rash. Funny how I'm not called an idiot or troll or retarded by anyone else but you and sulla.

-Anna
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66058 From: C. Maria Caeca Date: 2009-05-25
Subject: Re: our untapped resource
Salvete Omnes,

Let me say first, that I am not trying to launch any kind of political
campaign. What I am trying to do is to encourage people (whose presence in
this organization presupposes certain common interests) to talk to one
another, informally. I contend that civil, informal conversation is
*always* a positive thing, no matter how or where it takes place, and that
little but can good can come of it. Of course, when we can, meeting is
preferential to anything else, but when we can't, then I submit that we do
what we *can* do, and try to get to know one another, at least a little.

Besides, I do have a somewhat vested interest, I'd very much like to get to
know some of you, on a less formal, more personal basis, and knowing me
might not be altogether unpleasant. Some may think I am silly, some may
think I am naive, and some may thing I am fighting a loosing or irrelevant
battle, which won't stop me or even slow me down. I'm not overly much
concerned with what venue we use (so long as I *can* use it), but I do
assure you, there are no monsters in the current room (well, maybe one or 2,
but we just throw them the occasional gobbets of raw meat, and finish our
sentences.)

Yes, there can be heated debates, though I've seen less vitriol there than
here, frankly, and when it gets too hot for me, I wave bye, and come back
when things calm down.

Please, my dear friends, is it *so* hard to talk together, and maybe have a
bit of fun?

Valete,
C. Maria Caeca
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66059 From: lathyrus77 Date: 2009-05-25
Subject: Re: our untapped resource
And now I'm banned, by the troll poplicola. I guess he wasn't serious about his "tolerating peolpe who disagree".

This untapped resource is probably untapped because of this nonsense.


-Anna
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66060 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2009-05-25
Subject: Rusticatio Virginiana (et al.) Latin immersion(s)
Rusticatio Virginiana (et al.) Latin immersion(s) A. Tullia Scholastica quiritibus, sociis, peregrinisque bonae voluntatis S.P.D.

    Below I have copied a notice about the Rusticatio Virginiana Latin immersion event.  Please note that one week is devoted to more advanced speakers, and one to beginners...but typically the term beginners does not refer to those who have never had Latin.  The living Latin courses (for which this should qualify) formerly offered by the AT, and now by Avitus and yours truly, require at least two years of Latin before embarking on these conventicula and rusticationes, which are total Latin immersion events.  No one is allowed to speak English (or any other vernacular) during the course of the conventiculum except when dealing with non-participants, such as food service employees.   Participants in conventicula held in Europe often find that there is no choice in such matters, for people come from lands where many different languages are spoken, and not all are mutually intelligible to all participants, but in the U.S., the temptation to speak English is great...and must be fought.  ;-)  If anyone is interested, I may be able to provide information about other conventicula in Europe and the U.S.

============

    
LATINA

Please help us spread the word about RUSTICATIO VIRGINIANA.  Even if you cannot attend yourself, and we hope you can, please share this information with people you know who would benefit from this tremendous and fun learning opportunity.
 
SALVI offers two sessions of RUSTICATIO this summer.  Week one from July 13 - 19 does not exclude beginners but is designed primarily for experienced Latin speakers.  Week two is for beginners only and runs from July 20 - 26.
 
Established over ten years ago, RUSTICATIO has a proven track record for creating programs that foster growth in living Latin in a congenial and down to earth atmosphere that is both fun and supportive.
 
The sessions fill up quickly.  So act now to guarantee your place! Complete details are posted on the SALVI web page at http://www.latin. org/
 
Our site is the historic Claymont Estate in scenic Charles Town, WV, just one hour by car from Washington-Dulles International Airport.

==========

Valete.  

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66061 From: David Kling Date: 2009-05-25
Subject: Re: Sulla's rebuttal - Re: Nova-Roma is life
Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus C. Petronio salutem dicit

Exactly.  Nova Roma is NOT simply an on-line thing.  Several years ago I attended a provincial event that included an oratory competition between Marcus Octavius Gracchus and Marcus Bianchius Antonius at a park in Columbus, Ohio.  I now live in Columbus (just north actually) and was at a local park with my girlfriend.  I looked over and said, "Oh.  That was the site of an oratory competition and provincial event in Nova Roma."  I stood there and thought about that occassion pleasantly.  It is memories like that one, and others, that have captivated me -- and drawn me closer to the dream of Nova Roma.

Nova Roma is about people.  Bringing people together who have a common love of Rome and her history and culture.  The mud slinging and the fighting is only ancilliary to what it is all really about!

I'm pleased you had a good time at the Floralia, and I commend Lentulus for organizing such a wonderful event.  It is my hope to eventually come to Europe and connect with Nova Romans there!

Vale;

Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus

On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 7:30 PM, Gaius Petronius Dexter <jfarnoud94@...> wrote:


C. Petronius L. Sullae s.p.d.,

> NR is your life? Seriously? NR is your life? So what would happen if NR ceased to exist? Would the purpose of your life be snuffed out and you would have no reason to live?
>
> Is that point of view really healthy? This is a voluntary internet corporation and you place it with such importance that it is YOUR LIFE?

It is more than an internet corporation, Sulla. I came back today from Aquincum where I was three days with nova Roman citizens, real and living. I spoke Latin with Lentulus, Cordus and Livia. We made many things for Nova Roma in real life in Budapest/Aquincum.

Above all we performed the sacra of the Floralia with true dutifulness and faith. The audience at the ceremony in this Sunday were certainly most important than the audience at the same time to the mass at Paris in Notre Dame.

Vale.
C. Petronius Dexter


Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66062 From: David Kling Date: 2009-05-25
Subject: Re: MY SUPPORT FOR K. FABIUS BUTEO MODIANUS
Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus Q. Valerio Poplicolae salutem dicit

Since you have not been around long you would have understood.  All the gens were listed in the old gens listing, before the gens reform, in the feminine.  For example, I was previously in Gens Modia not Gens Modius.  I was a Modius being male, but the gens was referred to as Gens Modius.  Likewise, all gens were referred to in the feminine for example, Gens Cassia, Fabia, Equitia, et al.  That is how they were listed and that is how they were referred to.

Your attempt at humor simply is not funny, and shows your newness.  You really are a jerk I see.  You're in good complany in the Back Alley.  Your kind of people. 

Vale;

Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus

On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 8:23 PM, Q. Valerius Poplicola <q.valerius.poplicola@...> wrote:


On the upside, Modianus let it out that he's a girl now.

I quote:



> > I too am now a Fabia and Quintus Fabius Maximus is NOT my pater familias.

Looks like Aeternia's comment about Modianus, er I mean Modiana needing midol was spot on.



Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66063 From: David Kling Date: 2009-05-25
Subject: Re: MY SUPPORT FOR K. FABIUS BUTEO MODIANUS
Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus Lucio Cornelio Ciceroni salutem dicit

Sometimes a joke is appropriate and sometimes it is not.  If Quintus Fabius Maximus had known and been friends with Quinta Fabia Drusilla that might have been one thing, but I suspect he is not; therefore, he has not earned the right to joke in the sexist manner in which he did.  He is also NOT the pater familias of Gens Fabia.  He is ONLY the pater familias of ONE -- himself.

Vale;

Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus

On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 12:46 PM, Lucius Cornelius Cicero <Cicero@...> wrote:


Ever heard of a joke, you two? Guess not. Despicable the way you'll try and turn anything into something that can be used for political advantage.


--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, David Kling <tau.athanasios@...> wrote:
>
> Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus Quintae Fabiae Drusillae salutem dicit
>
> I too am now a Fabia and Quintus Fabius Maximus is NOT my pater familias.
> He is not your pater familias either, and his insinuation that he is
> acknowledges he has no understanding of the gens reform of several years
> ago.
>
> Again I appreciate your support.
>
> Vale;
>
> Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus



Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66064 From: Maior Date: 2009-05-25
Subject: Re: MY SUPPORT FOR K. FABIUS BUTEO MODIANUS
Salvete Modiane et omnes:
thanks for that I appreciate it, Poplicola and Maximus aren't very respectful of women and furthermore viri take the sexist talk to Tartarus, the matrones of Nova Roma deserve your respect.
bene valete in pacem deorum
Marca Hortensia Maior




> Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus Lucio Cornelio Ciceroni salutem dicit
>
> Sometimes a joke is appropriate and sometimes it is not. If Quintus Fabius
> Maximus had known and been friends with Quinta Fabia Drusilla that might
> have been one thing, but I suspect he is not; therefore, he has not earned
> the right to joke in the sexist manner in which he did. He is also NOT the
> pater familias of Gens Fabia. He is ONLY the pater familias of ONE --
> himself.
>
> Vale;
>
> Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus
>
> On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 12:46 PM, Lucius Cornelius Cicero
> <Cicero@...>wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > Ever heard of a joke, you two? Guess not. Despicable the way you'll try and
> > turn anything into something that can be used for political advantage.
> >
> > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com <Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com>, David
> > Kling <tau.athanasios@> wrote:
> > >
> > > Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus Quintae Fabiae Drusillae salutem dicit
> > >
> > > I too am now a Fabia and Quintus Fabius Maximus is NOT my pater familias.
> > > He is not your pater familias either, and his insinuation that he is
> > > acknowledges he has no understanding of the gens reform of several years
> > > ago.
> > >
> > > Again I appreciate your support.
> > >
> > > Vale;
> > >
> > > Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66065 From: Steve Moore Date: 2009-05-26
Subject: Re: Sulla's rebuttal - Re: Nova-Roma is life

M. Valerius Potitus Caeso Fabio Buteo Modiano SPD.

 

Today you wrote, “Nova Roma is about people.  Bringing people together who have a common love of Rome and her history and culture.  The mud slinging and the fighting is only ancilliary to what it is all really about!”

 

I hope you remember these words if you are elected Censor.

 

Vale,

Potitus

 

 

 


From: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com [mailto: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com ] On Behalf Of David Kling
Sent: Monday, May 25, 2009 7:41 PM
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Sulla's rebuttal - Re: Nova-Roma is life

 


Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus C. Petronio salutem dicit

Exactly.  Nova Roma is NOT simply an on-line thing.  Several years ago I attended a provincial event that included an oratory competition between Marcus Octavius Gracchus and Marcus Bianchius Antonius at a park in Columbus , Ohio .  I now live in Columbus (just north actually) and was at a local park with my girlfriend.  I looked over and said, "Oh.  That was the site of an oratory competition and provincial event in Nova Roma."  I stood there and thought about that occassion pleasantly.  It is memories like that one, and others, that have captivated me -- and drawn me closer to the dream of Nova Roma.

Nova Roma is about people.  Bringing people together who have a common love of Rome and her history and culture.  The mud slinging and the fighting is only ancilliary to what it is all really about!

I'm pleased you had a good time at the Floralia, and I commend Lentulus for organizing such a wonderful event.  It is my hope to eventually come to Europe and connect with Nova Romans there!

Vale;

Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus

 

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66066 From: David Kling Date: 2009-05-26
Subject: Re: Sulla's rebuttal - Re: Nova-Roma is life
Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus M. Valerio Potio salutem dicit

Of course I'll remember it.  If elected this will not be the first time I've held office.  I've held several offices in Nova Roma and I've never forgotten why I am here.

Vale;

Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus

On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 12:16 AM, Steve Moore <astrobear@...> wrote:


M. Valerius Potitus Caeso Fabio Buteo Modiano SPD.

 

Today you wrote, “Nova Roma is about people.  Bringing people together who have a common love of Rome and her history and culture.  The mud slinging and the fighting is only ancilliary to what it is all really about!”

 

I hope you remember these words if you are elected Censor.

 

Vale,

Potitus




Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66067 From: Maior Date: 2009-05-26
Subject: Sulla's rebuttal - Re: Nova-Roma is life
Salvete;
he's been censor and he conducted himself with impartiality and dignitas.
now please let's not have a hate-Modianus/Cato exercise. Talk about positive aspects of your candidate.
Marca Hortensia Maior
>
>
>
> Today you wrote, "Nova Roma is about people. Bringing people together who
> have a common love of Rome and her history and culture. The mud slinging
> and the fighting is only ancilliary to what it is all really about!"
>
>
>
> I hope you remember these words if you are elected Censor.
>
>
>
> Vale,
>
> Potitus
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _____
>
> From: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com [mailto:Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf
> Of David Kling
> Sent: Monday, May 25, 2009 7:41 PM
> To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Sulla's rebuttal - Re: Nova-Roma is life
>
>
>
>
> Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus C. Petronio salutem dicit
>
> Exactly. Nova Roma is NOT simply an on-line thing. Several years ago I
> attended a provincial event that included an oratory competition between
> Marcus Octavius Gracchus and Marcus Bianchius Antonius at a park in
> Columbus, Ohio. I now live in Columbus (just north actually) and was at a
> local park with my girlfriend. I looked over and said, "Oh. That was the
> site of an oratory competition and provincial event in Nova Roma." I stood
> there and thought about that occassion pleasantly. It is memories like that
> one, and others, that have captivated me -- and drawn me closer to the dream
> of Nova Roma.
>
> Nova Roma is about people. Bringing people together who have a common love
> of Rome and her history and culture. The mud slinging and the fighting is
> only ancilliary to what it is all really about!
>
> I'm pleased you had a good time at the Floralia, and I commend Lentulus for
> organizing such a wonderful event. It is my hope to eventually come to
> Europe and connect with Nova Romans there!
>
> Vale;
>
> Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66068 From: Q. Valerius Poplicola Date: 2009-05-26
Subject: Re: our untapped resource
If anyone wants to know the truth, they may ask me, but I don't suffer trolls.

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "lathyrus77" <lathyrus77@...> wrote:
>
> And now I'm banned, by the troll poplicola. I guess he wasn't serious about his "tolerating peolpe who disagree".
>
> This untapped resource is probably untapped because of this nonsense.
>
>
> -Anna
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66069 From: QFabiusMaxmi@aol.com Date: 2009-05-26
Subject: Re: MY SUPPORT FOR K. FABIUS BUTEO MODIANUS
In a message dated 5/25/2009 5:27:53 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time, q.valerius.poplicola@... writes:
I too am now a Fabia and Quintus Fabius Maximus is NOT my pater familias.
You are a Fabii that is of the Gens of Fabia.  And yes I started the Gens so I'd like for those with Fabian nomen to set a good example of being in tune with being and following Roman practices. 
 
What was your original Gens?  I confess I forget.
 
Q. Fabius Maximus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66070 From: MCC Date: 2009-05-26
Subject: Re: COMITIA CENTURIATA: Election for Censor
Salvete

Memento:

-today only are allowed to vote the members of the Centuria Praerogativa (Centuria XIV)
-from 27 to 29 May only are allowed to vote the members of the First Class centuries (Centuries I to XV)
-from 30 May to 3 June are allowed to vote the members of all centuries.

Please check your own centuria in your profile in the Album Civium (http://www.novaroma.org/civitas/album)

Valete

M. Curiatius Complutensis
Consul



Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66071 From: lathyrus77 Date: 2009-05-26
Subject: Re: our untapped resource
Yea. STill not a troll. And I have the actual chat logs so don't even pretend otherwise.

Amazing how we were able to continue our discussion(for over an hour) in private, without you.

Chatting is so much more pleasant with out you around troll.

-Anna


--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Q. Valerius Poplicola" <q.valerius.poplicola@...> wrote:
>
> If anyone wants to know the truth, they may ask me, but I don't suffer trolls.
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "lathyrus77" <lathyrus77@> wrote:
> >
> > And now I'm banned, by the troll poplicola. I guess he wasn't serious about his "tolerating peolpe who disagree".
> >
> > This untapped resource is probably untapped because of this nonsense.
> >
> >
> > -Anna
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66072 From: violetphearsen@yahoo.com Date: 2009-05-26
Subject: Re: MY SUPPORT FOR K. FABIUS BUTEO MODIANUS
I agree. I have sometimes been appalled by the lack of respect shown to the women of Nova Roma by some of the men. Sexist jokes are never funny.
And Modianus is right. I remember when I joined, all the Gens were listed in the feminine form.
 
Maxima Valeria Messallina


--- On Mon, 5/25/09, Maior <rory12001@...> wrote:

From: Maior <rory12001@...>
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: MY SUPPORT FOR K. FABIUS BUTEO MODIANUS
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Date: Monday, May 25, 2009, 8:42 PM

Salvete Modiane et omnes:
thanks for that I appreciate it, Poplicola and Maximus aren't very respectful of women and furthermore viri take the sexist talk to Tartarus, the matrones of Nova Roma deserve your respect.
bene valete in pacem deorum
Marca Hortensia Maior

> Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus Lucio Cornelio Ciceroni salutem dicit
>
> Sometimes a joke is appropriate and sometimes it is not. If Quintus Fabius
> Maximus had known and been friends with Quinta Fabia Drusilla that might
> have been one thing, but I suspect he is not; therefore, he has not earned
> the right to joke in the sexist manner in which he did. He is also NOT the
> pater familias of Gens Fabia. He is ONLY the pater familias of ONE --
> himself.
>
> Vale;
>
> Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus
>
> On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 12:46 PM, Lucius Cornelius Cicero
> <Cicero@...> wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > Ever heard of a joke, you two? Guess not. Despicable the way you'll try and
> > turn anything into something that can be used for political advantage.
> >
> > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com <Nova-Roma%40yahoog roups.com> , David
> > Kling <tau.athanasios@ > wrote:
> > >
> > > Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus Quintae Fabiae Drusillae salutem dicit
> > >
> > > I too am now a Fabia and Quintus Fabius Maximus is NOT my pater familias.
> > > He is not your pater familias either, and his insinuation that he is
> > > acknowledges he has no understanding of the gens reform of several years
> > > ago.
> > >
> > > Again I appreciate your support.
> > >
> > > Vale;
> > >
> > > Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus
> >
> >
> >
> >
>


Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66073 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2009-05-26
Subject: Re: MY SUPPORT FOR K. FABIUS BUTEO MODIANUS
Actually we are an equal opportunity environment that makes jokes at everyone. It's just low hanging fruit when it comes to you, Maior. Or our resident neo-nazi former senator of NR. Like I said low hanging fruit.

But if you want to see other examples when we poke at the men - lets talk about the Xtian pontiffs of NR?

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Maior" <rory12001@...> wrote:
>
> Salvete Modiane et omnes:
> thanks for that I appreciate it, Poplicola and Maximus aren't very respectful of women and furthermore viri take the sexist talk to Tartarus, the matrones of Nova Roma deserve your respect.
> bene valete in pacem deorum
> Marca Hortensia Maior
>
>
>
>
> > Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus Lucio Cornelio Ciceroni salutem dicit
> >
> > Sometimes a joke is appropriate and sometimes it is not. If Quintus Fabius
> > Maximus had known and been friends with Quinta Fabia Drusilla that might
> > have been one thing, but I suspect he is not; therefore, he has not earned
> > the right to joke in the sexist manner in which he did. He is also NOT the
> > pater familias of Gens Fabia. He is ONLY the pater familias of ONE --
> > himself.
> >
> > Vale;
> >
> > Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus
> >
> > On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 12:46 PM, Lucius Cornelius Cicero
> > <Cicero@>wrote:
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > Ever heard of a joke, you two? Guess not. Despicable the way you'll try and
> > > turn anything into something that can be used for political advantage.
> > >
> > > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com <Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com>, David
> > > Kling <tau.athanasios@> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus Quintae Fabiae Drusillae salutem dicit
> > > >
> > > > I too am now a Fabia and Quintus Fabius Maximus is NOT my pater familias.
> > > > He is not your pater familias either, and his insinuation that he is
> > > > acknowledges he has no understanding of the gens reform of several years
> > > > ago.
> > > >
> > > > Again I appreciate your support.
> > > >
> > > > Vale;
> > > >
> > > > Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66074 From: Q. Valerius Poplicola Date: 2009-05-26
Subject: Re: MY SUPPORT FOR K. FABIUS BUTEO MODIANUS
Q. Valerius Poplicola K. Fabiae Modianae:

You have no idea, Modiana. Calling yourself a "Fabia" is calling yourself a woman. Don't you mean you're a member of the Gens Fabia? Gens is feminine, and thus Fabius agrees with that. But when you call yourself something, you agree with your own gender. So you're a Fabius, or a member of the Gens Fabia, but unless you're a female, you're not a Fabia.

Lighten up, if you can't take jokes about yourself, what kind of a censor would you be? Not a pleasant one that's for sure.

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, David Kling <tau.athanasios@...> wrote:
>
> Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus Q. Valerio Poplicolae salutem dicit
>
> Since you have not been around long you would have understood. All the gens
> were listed in the old gens listing, before the gens reform, in the
> feminine. For example, I was previously in Gens Modia not Gens Modius. I
> was a Modius being male, but the gens was referred to as Gens Modius.
> Likewise, all gens were referred to in the feminine for example, Gens
> Cassia, Fabia, Equitia, et al. That is how they were listed and that is how
> they were referred to.
>
> Your attempt at humor simply is not funny, and shows your newness. You
> really are a jerk I see. You're in good complany in the Back Alley. Your
> kind of people.
>
> Vale;
>
> Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus
>
> On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 8:23 PM, Q. Valerius Poplicola <
> q.valerius.poplicola@...> wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > On the upside, Modianus let it out that he's a girl now.
> >
> > I quote:
> >
> >
> > > > I too am now a Fabia and Quintus Fabius Maximus is NOT my pater
> > familias.
> >
> > Looks like Aeternia's comment about Modianus, er I mean Modiana needing
> > midol was spot on.
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66075 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2009-05-26
Subject: Sulla's rebuttal - Re: Nova-Roma is life
That is the funniest lie I have ever heard. Revisionist history. Gotta love it. Next you will say the shoah (holocaust) never took place!

Vale,

Sulla


--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Maior" <rory12001@...> wrote:
>
> Salvete;
> he's been censor and he conducted himself with impartiality and dignitas.
> now please let's not have a hate-Modianus/Cato exercise. Talk about positive aspects of your candidate.
> Marca Hortensia Maior
> >
> >
> >
> > Today you wrote, "Nova Roma is about people. Bringing people together who
> > have a common love of Rome and her history and culture. The mud slinging
> > and the fighting is only ancilliary to what it is all really about!"
> >
> >
> >
> > I hope you remember these words if you are elected Censor.
> >
> >
> >
> > Vale,
> >
> > Potitus
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > _____
> >
> > From: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com [mailto:Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf
> > Of David Kling
> > Sent: Monday, May 25, 2009 7:41 PM
> > To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> > Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Sulla's rebuttal - Re: Nova-Roma is life
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus C. Petronio salutem dicit
> >
> > Exactly. Nova Roma is NOT simply an on-line thing. Several years ago I
> > attended a provincial event that included an oratory competition between
> > Marcus Octavius Gracchus and Marcus Bianchius Antonius at a park in
> > Columbus, Ohio. I now live in Columbus (just north actually) and was at a
> > local park with my girlfriend. I looked over and said, "Oh. That was the
> > site of an oratory competition and provincial event in Nova Roma." I stood
> > there and thought about that occassion pleasantly. It is memories like that
> > one, and others, that have captivated me -- and drawn me closer to the dream
> > of Nova Roma.
> >
> > Nova Roma is about people. Bringing people together who have a common love
> > of Rome and her history and culture. The mud slinging and the fighting is
> > only ancilliary to what it is all really about!
> >
> > I'm pleased you had a good time at the Floralia, and I commend Lentulus for
> > organizing such a wonderful event. It is my hope to eventually come to
> > Europe and connect with Nova Romans there!
> >
> > Vale;
> >
> > Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66076 From: Lucius Cornelius Cicero Date: 2009-05-26
Subject: Re: MY SUPPORT FOR K. FABIUS BUTEO MODIANUS
There was nothing sexist about that joke. Please, more feigned indignation! Is that the main thing this group exists for? Feigned indignation and faux outrage to try and whip up political support?

Cicero

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, violetphearsen@... wrote:
>
>
> I agree. I have sometimes been appalled by the lack of respect shown to the women of Nova Roma by some of the men. Sexist jokes are never funny.
> And Modianus is right. I remember when I joined, all the Gens were listed in the feminine form.
>
> Maxima Valeria Messallina
>
>
> --- On Mon, 5/25/09, Maior <rory12001@...> wrote:
>
>
> From: Maior <rory12001@...>
> Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: MY SUPPORT FOR K. FABIUS BUTEO MODIANUS
> To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> Date: Monday, May 25, 2009, 8:42 PM
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Salvete Modiane et omnes:
> thanks for that I appreciate it, Poplicola and Maximus aren't very respectful of women and furthermore viri take the sexist talk to Tartarus, the matrones of Nova Roma deserve your respect.
> bene valete in pacem deorum
> Marca Hortensia Maior
>
> > Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus Lucio Cornelio Ciceroni salutem dicit
> >
> > Sometimes a joke is appropriate and sometimes it is not. If Quintus Fabius
> > Maximus had known and been friends with Quinta Fabia Drusilla that might
> > have been one thing, but I suspect he is not; therefore, he has not earned
> > the right to joke in the sexist manner in which he did. He is also NOT the
> > pater familias of Gens Fabia. He is ONLY the pater familias of ONE --
> > himself.
> >
> > Vale;
> >
> > Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus
> >
> > On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 12:46 PM, Lucius Cornelius Cicero
> > <Cicero@> wrote:
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > Ever heard of a joke, you two? Guess not. Despicable the way you'll try and
> > > turn anything into something that can be used for political advantage.
> > >
> > > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com <Nova-Roma%40yahoog roups.com> , David
> > > Kling <tau.athanasios@ > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus Quintae Fabiae Drusillae salutem dicit
> > > >
> > > > I too am now a Fabia and Quintus Fabius Maximus is NOT my pater familias.
> > > > He is not your pater familias either, and his insinuation that he is
> > > > acknowledges he has no understanding of the gens reform of several years
> > > > ago.
> > > >
> > > > Again I appreciate your support.
> > > >
> > > > Vale;
> > > >
> > > > Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66077 From: Q. Valerius Poplicola Date: 2009-05-26
Subject: Sulla's rebuttal - Re: Nova-Roma is life
Cato has not done anything to jeopardize our organization; Modianus broke both Nova Roma and US law. Cato has as a Christian promoted the Religio Romana, Modianus only knows how to bash Christianity. Cato has promoted many ideas about law reform to better our organization; Modianus took a break because life was too hectic for him at the time, and now only is running to spite Cato.

Regardless of whether Modianus' candidacy is legal or illegal, he's clearly the inferior candidate.

GO CATO!

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Maior" <rory12001@...> wrote:
>
> Salvete;
> he's been censor and he conducted himself with impartiality and dignitas.
> now please let's not have a hate-Modianus/Cato exercise. Talk about positive aspects of your candidate.
> Marca Hortensia Maior
> >
> >
> >
> > Today you wrote, "Nova Roma is about people. Bringing people together who
> > have a common love of Rome and her history and culture. The mud slinging
> > and the fighting is only ancilliary to what it is all really about!"
> >
> >
> >
> > I hope you remember these words if you are elected Censor.
> >
> >
> >
> > Vale,
> >
> > Potitus
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > _____
> >
> > From: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com [mailto:Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf
> > Of David Kling
> > Sent: Monday, May 25, 2009 7:41 PM
> > To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> > Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Sulla's rebuttal - Re: Nova-Roma is life
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus C. Petronio salutem dicit
> >
> > Exactly. Nova Roma is NOT simply an on-line thing. Several years ago I
> > attended a provincial event that included an oratory competition between
> > Marcus Octavius Gracchus and Marcus Bianchius Antonius at a park in
> > Columbus, Ohio. I now live in Columbus (just north actually) and was at a
> > local park with my girlfriend. I looked over and said, "Oh. That was the
> > site of an oratory competition and provincial event in Nova Roma." I stood
> > there and thought about that occassion pleasantly. It is memories like that
> > one, and others, that have captivated me -- and drawn me closer to the dream
> > of Nova Roma.
> >
> > Nova Roma is about people. Bringing people together who have a common love
> > of Rome and her history and culture. The mud slinging and the fighting is
> > only ancilliary to what it is all really about!
> >
> > I'm pleased you had a good time at the Floralia, and I commend Lentulus for
> > organizing such a wonderful event. It is my hope to eventually come to
> > Europe and connect with Nova Romans there!
> >
> > Vale;
> >
> > Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66078 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2009-05-26
Subject: Re: our untapped resource
Don't bring me into the conversation, you nazi. I have nothing to do with it.

Go back and post on stormfront, your 800+ posts there obviously skewed your brain.

Vale,

Sulla

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "lathyrus77" <lathyrus77@...> wrote:
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Q. Valerius Poplicola" <q.valerius.poplicola@> wrote:
> Anna has the sole distinction of being moderated on account of her trolling, and furthermore because she's not a civis there's much less tolerance for her.
> >
>
>
> I wasn't moderated for trolling. Metellus apologized for muting me and said he had been rash. Funny how I'm not called an idiot or troll or retarded by anyone else but you and sulla.
>
> -Anna
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66079 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2009-05-26
Subject: Re: our untapped resource
Awww so what you are playing the victim? Poor little Stormfront Nazi. Go back to your environment.

Vale,

Sulla

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "lathyrus77" <lathyrus77@...> wrote:
>
> And now I'm banned, by the troll poplicola. I guess he wasn't serious about his "tolerating peolpe who disagree".
>
> This untapped resource is probably untapped because of this nonsense.
>
>
> -Anna
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66080 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2009-05-26
Subject: A vote for NR is a vote for Cato
Let's also keep in mind. Cato will not peruse personal vendettas. Whereas Modianus has ALWAYS done that (Cincinnatus, Cassius, Me). It's just when he comes to try to deal with me. I will fight back. With Modianus as Censor he will take NR into a lawsuit. NR will lose. Modianus will become homeless. Because I will go after him and every single board member who allowed Modianus to break the law and peruse his vendetta. So, unless the board members are willing to put up their own personal funds. Modianus will be the cause of the one thing that can potentially end the organization- a lawsuit.

Vale,

Sulla

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Q. Valerius Poplicola" <q.valerius.poplicola@...> wrote:
>
> Cato has not done anything to jeopardize our organization; Modianus broke both Nova Roma and US law. Cato has as a Christian promoted the Religio Romana, Modianus only knows how to bash Christianity. Cato has promoted many ideas about law reform to better our organization; Modianus took a break because life was too hectic for him at the time, and now only is running to spite Cato.
>
> Regardless of whether Modianus' candidacy is legal or illegal, he's clearly the inferior candidate.
>
> GO CATO!
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Maior" <rory12001@> wrote:
> >
> > Salvete;
> > he's been censor and he conducted himself with impartiality and dignitas.
> > now please let's not have a hate-Modianus/Cato exercise. Talk about positive aspects of your candidate.
> > Marca Hortensia Maior
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Today you wrote, "Nova Roma is about people. Bringing people together who
> > > have a common love of Rome and her history and culture. The mud slinging
> > > and the fighting is only ancilliary to what it is all really about!"
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > I hope you remember these words if you are elected Censor.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Vale,
> > >
> > > Potitus
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > _____
> > >
> > > From: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com [mailto:Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf
> > > Of David Kling
> > > Sent: Monday, May 25, 2009 7:41 PM
> > > To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> > > Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Sulla's rebuttal - Re: Nova-Roma is life
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus C. Petronio salutem dicit
> > >
> > > Exactly. Nova Roma is NOT simply an on-line thing. Several years ago I
> > > attended a provincial event that included an oratory competition between
> > > Marcus Octavius Gracchus and Marcus Bianchius Antonius at a park in
> > > Columbus, Ohio. I now live in Columbus (just north actually) and was at a
> > > local park with my girlfriend. I looked over and said, "Oh. That was the
> > > site of an oratory competition and provincial event in Nova Roma." I stood
> > > there and thought about that occassion pleasantly. It is memories like that
> > > one, and others, that have captivated me -- and drawn me closer to the dream
> > > of Nova Roma.
> > >
> > > Nova Roma is about people. Bringing people together who have a common love
> > > of Rome and her history and culture. The mud slinging and the fighting is
> > > only ancilliary to what it is all really about!
> > >
> > > I'm pleased you had a good time at the Floralia, and I commend Lentulus for
> > > organizing such a wonderful event. It is my hope to eventually come to
> > > Europe and connect with Nova Romans there!
> > >
> > > Vale;
> > >
> > > Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus
> > >
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66081 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2009-05-26
Subject: MY SUPPORT FOR C. EQUITIUS CATO FOR CENSOR
Cato omnibus in foro SPD

Salvete!

Yes, that's right - I support Cato for censor!

Since I have only one private cultus, I don't come at the religio with a set of preformed ideas about how it should run, and have supported whole-heartedly the efforts of those who would make it live and breathe again; I ask questions and will to everything in my power to uphold and foster it on its own terms, not outside influences.

I'm the only magistrate in Nova Roman history to call, by issuing an edict, for a public observance of several festivals in honor of the Gods.

I'm the only magistrate in Nova Roman history who created a plan to subsidize the priests of the religio in their daily worship.

I'm the first magistrate in Nova Roman history to arrange a recreation of a contio, at the Conventus in Rome.

I'm the only magistrate in Nova Roman history who refused to issue an edict restricting the free speech of our citizens in the Forum, believing that if you give people responsibility they will - on the whole - use it wisely. Treat people like adults and they usually do.

I'm the only Nova Roman who has acted as an advocatus for both political "friends" and "opponents" because of my desire to see the law applied equally to *all* citizens (even if I didn't win them all).

I have never used any office I held to discriminate against or take revenge on anyone, no matter how openly or persistently they spoke against me - in fact, I have welcomed several into my cohors in the past.

For over two years I published a public calendar of the feasts and observances of the Gods.

I'm fun, hardworking, intelligent, and not dour at all. And I can play the piano!

Sort of.

So I support me for censor!

Valete!

Cato
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66082 From: Titus Flavius Aquila Date: 2009-05-26
Subject: AW: [Nova-Roma] Re: our untapped resource
If you call somebody a Nazi, you have to be careful that nobody calls you a Zionist.
According to an UN resolution , Zionism is racism.
So you better be careful what you say and refrain from obviously insulting terms.
It seems you are still fighting the old war from the 40s, are you ? Get over it.
Vale
Titus Flavius Aquila

Von: Robert Woolwine <l_cornelius_sulla@...>
An: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Gesendet: Dienstag, den 26. Mai 2009, 15:50:58 Uhr
Betreff: [Nova-Roma] Re: our untapped resource

Don't bring me into the conversation, you nazi. I have nothing to do with it.

Go back and post on stormfront, your 800+ posts there obviously skewed your brain.

Vale,

Sulla

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com, "lathyrus77" <lathyrus77@ ...> wrote:
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com, "Q. Valerius Poplicola" <q.valerius. poplicola@ > wrote:
> Anna has the sole distinction of being moderated on account of her trolling, and furthermore because she's not a civis there's much less tolerance for her.
> >
>
>
> I wasn't moderated for trolling. Metellus apologized for muting me and said he had been rash. Funny how I'm not called an idiot or troll or retarded by anyone else but you and sulla.
>
> -Anna
>


Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66083 From: David Kling Date: 2009-05-26
Subject: Re: MY SUPPORT FOR C. EQUITIUS CATO FOR CENSOR
Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus Gaio Equitio Catoni salutem dicit

Have you ever worked for a censor?  Have you ever helped with the census?

Vale;

Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus

On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 10:00 AM, Gaius Equitius Cato <mlcinnyc@...> wrote:


Cato omnibus in foro SPD

Salvete!

Yes, that's right - I support Cato for censor!

Since I have only one private cultus, I don't come at the religio with a set of preformed ideas about how it should run, and have supported whole-heartedly the efforts of those who would make it live and breathe again; I ask questions and will to everything in my power to uphold and foster it on its own terms, not outside influences.

I'm the only magistrate in Nova Roman history to call, by issuing an edict, for a public observance of several festivals in honor of the Gods.

I'm the only magistrate in Nova Roman history who created a plan to subsidize the priests of the religio in their daily worship.

I'm the first magistrate in Nova Roman history to arrange a recreation of a contio, at the Conventus in Rome.

I'm the only magistrate in Nova Roman history who refused to issue an edict restricting the free speech of our citizens in the Forum, believing that if you give people responsibility they will - on the whole - use it wisely. Treat people like adults and they usually do.

I'm the only Nova Roman who has acted as an advocatus for both political "friends" and "opponents" because of my desire to see the law applied equally to *all* citizens (even if I didn't win them all).

I have never used any office I held to discriminate against or take revenge on anyone, no matter how openly or persistently they spoke against me - in fact, I have welcomed several into my cohors in the past.

For over two years I published a public calendar of the feasts and observances of the Gods.

I'm fun, hardworking, intelligent, and not dour at all. And I can play the piano!

Sort of.

So I support me for censor!

Valete!

Cato




Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66084 From: Titus Iulius Sabinus Date: 2009-05-26
Subject: My vote is for K. Fabius Buteo Modianus.
SALVETE!

In the current election for censor suffectus my vote is going to K. Fabius Buteo Modianus. In the current NR conjuncture I consider him the necessary option to keep the things in equilibrium.
K. Fabius Buteo Modianus is open to discussions. Despite others said he didn't refused discussions based of common sense and collaboration. For discussions or collaborations there are necessary more parts than one. During the time he represented the part open to them.
He has experience in the censorial office. With him and the current censor Galerius Paulinus in office, Nova Roma will benefit of correct balance in all what their duties have relevance and significance.
This moment Nova Rona doesn't need radical movements or movements based of particular interests, vendetta or nepotism.
K. Fabius Buteo Modianus has enough personality to handle various situations including that artificially created.

I urge our people to vote for K. Fabius Buteo Modianus.

VALETE,
T. Iulius Sabinus
Proconsul Daciae.
Pontifex.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66085 From: L Julia Aquila Date: 2009-05-26
Subject: Re: MY SUPPORT FOR K. FABIUS BUTEO MODIANUS
Salvete,

I came across this article about humor and it makes some interesting points:
http://lgbusinesssolutions.typepad.com/solutions_to_grow_your_bu/2009/03/bad-humor-is-usually-tasteless-and-rude.html

A few excerpts that deal with the type of humor we are often assaulted with:
"Most of what passes for humor on Twitter and the blog posts I am familiar with has more to do with what 10-year-old boys do and say, as they learn how to make "buddies." They insult each other using name calling and tell jokes at other's expense. As we mature, most of us realize that stuff just isn't funny."
"In yesterday's effort, before the author shared that it was meant as humorless, comments were made up of personal attacks and silliness to belittle the author's efforts, an obvious statement that the writing failed to convey its purpose. After the author explained that the post was meant as parody, people then thought it was funny and accused those of us who didn't get it as lacking a sense of humor."
"Look, if you need to explain that what you are writing is parody or satire, you are not adept at the style and should practice privately until you perfect the art. And if it wasn't funny before you explain it, it isn't funny afterward. As for those who comment, if you think personal insults and silliness are funny... well, you're right. Folks like me don't get it and I hope I never do."
"The two things I remember most from my childhood humanization and socialization are my teachers and parents reminding me often that:
1. "If you can't say something nice... don't say nothing at all," which was first expressed by Thumper in the 1942 story of Bambi, and to
2. "Mind your Ps and Qs," an English phrase meaning mind your manners.
Good advice, I think. Especially when we now have the tools that allow us to say anything we want from a far away public place of safety, where rudeness has no risk of a punch in the nose, either figuratively or literally. Those who take such shots would be seen as cowardly in another time and place. Today, we call such folks bullies."

Valete,

L. Iulia Aquila
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66086 From: L Julia Aquila Date: 2009-05-26
Subject: Re: Voting procedures reminder
Salvete cives,

Important reminder:

The "centuria praerogativa"the diribitores selected is centuria XIV, that is, century 14, for this honor.

The Comitia Centuriata election will follow this schedule:

07:00 hrs CET 25 May: Voting by the Centuria Praerogativa alone begins.
07:00 hrs CET 27 May: Diribitores capture tally of Centuria Praerogativa.
07:00 hrs CET 27 May: Voting by all First Class centuries now permitted.
07:00 hrs CET 30 May: Diribitores capture tally of all First Class centuries.
07:00 hrs CET 30 May: Voting by all centuries now permitted.
17:00 hrs CET 3 June: All voting ends.

Valete,

L.Iulia Aquila

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "M. Lucretius Agricola" <marcus.lucretius@...> wrote:
>
> Agricola omnibus S.P.D.
>
>
>
> I would ask all citizen to read the following message completely.
>
>
>
> Our Lex Fabia de ratione comitiorum centuriatorum says in part:
>
> "A century from the first class shall be selected by lot by the diribitores to vote first. No century containing only one member shall be selected for this purpose. For the first 48 hours of the voting period only members of that century shall be permitted to vote."
>
> This is the "centuria praerogativa" and the diribitores selected centuria XIV, that is, century 14, for this honor.
>
> Since we are still within that first 48 hour period, any votes from citizens OTHER THAN centuria XIV cannot be counted.
>
> IF YOU HAVE VOTED ALREADY, YOUR VOTE CANNOT BE COUNTED UNLESS YOU ARE IN CENTURY 14. Anyone who voted too early will be able to re-vote later, at the correct time. Not sure if you are in this century? Check here: http://www.novaroma.org/civitas/album?cmd=show-century¢ury=14
>
> REMEMBER, Your century will have changed just before the election, so you must check your century in the Album Civium http://www.novaroma.org/civitas/album . You can simply search for yourself and read your century from your page.
>
>
> Our website explains voting by centuries, and here I have added notes and broken this text down to show clearly the three phases of voting:
>
> 1. During the first forty-eight hours of voting, only [the chosen] century is permitted to vote. At the end of that time, the diribitores will announce the results of the vote as they stand from that century.
>
> 2. Next, the entire first class [that is, centuries 1 through 14, inclusive], becomes eligible to vote. At the end of this second forty-eight hours of voting the diribitores will announce the results of the entire first class.
>
> 3. Finally, all the centuries become eligible to vote, for the remainder of the voting period. At no time in this do the centuria praerogativa or the first class become ineligible to vote. They may vote from the beginning of their voting time to the end of voting.
>
> The schedule for these three phases is posted on the election page, here: http://www.novaroma.org/nr/Election_Maius_MMDCCLXII_(Nova_Roma)
>
>
>
> Finally, please remember to take note of your BALLOT NUMBER. Problem ballots will be announced by BALLOT NUMBER.
>
>
> Thank you all for reading this and optime valete!
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66087 From: Lucius Cornelius Cicero Date: 2009-05-26
Subject: Re: MY SUPPORT FOR K. FABIUS BUTEO MODIANUS
But obviously these men you speak of don't deserve your respect, as you proceed to slander them in an open forum?


--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Maior" <rory12001@...> wrote:
>
> Salvete Modiane et omnes:
> thanks for that I appreciate it, Poplicola and Maximus aren't very respectful of women and furthermore viri take the sexist talk to Tartarus, the matrones of Nova Roma deserve your respect.
> bene valete in pacem deorum
> Marca Hortensia Maior
>
>
>
>
> > Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus Lucio Cornelio Ciceroni salutem dicit
> >
> > Sometimes a joke is appropriate and sometimes it is not. If Quintus Fabius
> > Maximus had known and been friends with Quinta Fabia Drusilla that might
> > have been one thing, but I suspect he is not; therefore, he has not earned
> > the right to joke in the sexist manner in which he did. He is also NOT the
> > pater familias of Gens Fabia. He is ONLY the pater familias of ONE --
> > himself.
> >
> > Vale;
> >
> > Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus
> >
> > On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 12:46 PM, Lucius Cornelius Cicero
> > <Cicero@>wrote:
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > Ever heard of a joke, you two? Guess not. Despicable the way you'll try and
> > > turn anything into something that can be used for political advantage.
> > >
> > > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com <Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com>, David
> > > Kling <tau.athanasios@> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus Quintae Fabiae Drusillae salutem dicit
> > > >
> > > > I too am now a Fabia and Quintus Fabius Maximus is NOT my pater familias.
> > > > He is not your pater familias either, and his insinuation that he is
> > > > acknowledges he has no understanding of the gens reform of several years
> > > > ago.
> > > >
> > > > Again I appreciate your support.
> > > >
> > > > Vale;
> > > >
> > > > Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66088 From: Lucius Cornelius Cicero Date: 2009-05-26
Subject: Re: MY SUPPORT FOR K. FABIUS BUTEO MODIANUS
Oh please. There was nothing sexist about the joke. And you know it.

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, David Kling <tau.athanasios@...> wrote:
>
> Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus Lucio Cornelio Ciceroni salutem dicit
>
> Sometimes a joke is appropriate and sometimes it is not. If Quintus Fabius
> Maximus had known and been friends with Quinta Fabia Drusilla that might
> have been one thing, but I suspect he is not; therefore, he has not earned
> the right to joke in the sexist manner in which he did. He is also NOT the
> pater familias of Gens Fabia. He is ONLY the pater familias of ONE --
> himself.
>
> Vale;
>
> Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus
>
> On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 12:46 PM, Lucius Cornelius Cicero
> <Cicero@...>wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > Ever heard of a joke, you two? Guess not. Despicable the way you'll try and
> > turn anything into something that can be used for political advantage.
> >
> > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com <Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com>, David
> > Kling <tau.athanasios@> wrote:
> > >
> > > Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus Quintae Fabiae Drusillae salutem dicit
> > >
> > > I too am now a Fabia and Quintus Fabius Maximus is NOT my pater familias.
> > > He is not your pater familias either, and his insinuation that he is
> > > acknowledges he has no understanding of the gens reform of several years
> > > ago.
> > >
> > > Again I appreciate your support.
> > >
> > > Vale;
> > >
> > > Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66089 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2009-05-26
Subject: Re: MY SUPPORT FOR C. EQUITIUS CATO FOR CENSOR
Cato Modiano sal.

Nope and yep.

In my line of work, we say that we could train a monkey to use a computer; the trick is getting them to understand why they're doing what they're doing.

The technical aspects of the job are, by everyone's admission, are both learnable and shared among the cohors who, by all evidence, are both hardworking and knowledgeable. Neither of us has real, functional Latin under our belt so let's not play the "technical knowledge" game.

Your attitude seems to be that no-one should ever try anything new; not a very helpful attitude for people who want to start a new project, or bring new life to something. What we need is fresh eyes and ears.

What I have *not* done is use the power of any office to attack an opponent. Have you? If so, when was it?

Vale!

Cato
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66090 From: L Julia Aquila Date: 2009-05-26
Subject: Re: Classic Poetry, Prose, Proems
Salvete Omnes,

This hours selection is from Petronius:
"Contempt is hateful; what I love is power,
To work my will at my own place and hour.
A wise man's scorn bends the most stubborn will,
The noblest victor he who spares to kill"

Contemni turpe est, legem donare superbum;
hoc amo, quod possum qua libet ire via.
Nam sane et sapiens contemptus iurgia nectit,
et qui non iugulat, victor abire solet.

Valete,
Julia
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66091 From: deciusiunius Date: 2009-05-26
Subject: Re: Two reasonable people should not fight, even if they don't share
Salve Iulia,


--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "L Julia Aquila" <dis_pensible@...> wrote:
>
> L. Iulia Aquila C. Fabio Buteoni Quintiliano D. Iunio Palladio S.P.D.
>
>
> Thank you for this post.
> It is not just from the great respect I have for my amící, Caeso >Fabius Buteo Quintilianus, although this is a very positive >influence, which brings me to extending the olive branch to my fellow >esteemed citizen, Decius Iunius Palladius.

I accept your olive branch and agree with my old friend Quintilianus that disagreements do not have to be fights, though I would not call political satire a fight. However, the past is the past and it would be productive to move on.

I shall see you all on my return, a month of no email should be a blessing. ;-)

Vale,

Palladius
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66092 From: PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@aol.com Date: 2009-05-26
Subject: Re: Candidacy!
Actually, I missed that email.  Perhaps someone can give me the number.  I will usually ask someone who makes a first time mistake like this to issue an apology or ask them to withdraw the statement publicly. 

Fl. Galerius Aurelianus


-----Original Message-----
From: Robert Woolwine <l_cornelius_sulla@...>
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Fri, 22 May 2009 6:12 pm
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Candidacy!



Ah, so even better. I thought Iulia Patrican, but Ok. Now the real test.

Let's see if Aurelianus is going to be consistent. She accused the Trib of bribery. And haul her up to the Comita Plebis...or is that reservation for those who he disagrees with?

Vale,

Sulla

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com, David Kling <tau.athanasios@ ...> wrote:
>
> She is a pleb.
>
> Modianus
>
> On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 6:34 PM, Robert Woolwine <
> l_cornelius_ sulla@... > wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > Aurelianus would you haul her up on trial too, if she was a Pleb?
> >
>

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66093 From: PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@aol.com Date: 2009-05-26
Subject: Re: procedural question
The Tribunes may indeed act independently on behalf of the Populi without anyone requesting an action.  However, in this case, I am guilty of letting the candidacy stand without challenge because I was unsure of the exact interpretation of the by-law in question.  I owe the Populi an apology for this error even though I was not absolutely convinced that about the differences and interpretations of the by-law, at the time.

Fl. Galerius Aurelianus


-----Original Message-----
From: C. Maria Caeca <shoshanahathaway@...>
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Fri, 22 May 2009 10:16 pm
Subject: [Nova-Roma] procedural question



Salvete Omnes,

A procedural question, if I may. Must the tribunes receive a r4equest,
either from a citizen or a magistrate to evaluate and pronounce on a legal
action, or can they act independently upon the published action, edict,
candidacy or proposed legislation?

Respectfully,
C. Maria Caeca

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66094 From: PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@aol.com Date: 2009-05-26
Subject: Re: MY SUPPORT FOR K. FABIUS BUTEO MODIANUS
Fl. Galerius Aurelianus Caeso Fabio Buteo Modiano sal.

Be cool.  It is time to let the water pass under the bridge.  The election is upon us and there is no longer a need to address every little barb.  If you are elected, the Populi will rely on you to keep a sure and constant hand, along with your colleague, on the moral and ethical rudder of Nova Roma.  Keep to the Constitution and by-laws.  Admonish privately and praise publicly.  If you are defeated, you should help the Censores by offering good public support and try to make your criticism constructive and (if possible) private.  You have nothing to prove to your friends and those who respect you.  You can keep your critics silent by keeping the Virtues and a tongue of good report.  There is little to be done with those who oppose you for you cannot change their minds by responding in kind.  Remember your Oaths and the duties which you owe to your Gods, your neighbor, and yourself.

Valete.


-----Original Message-----
From: David Kling <tau.athanasios@...>
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Mon, 25 May 2009 9:51 pm
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: MY SUPPORT FOR K. FABIUS BUTEO MODIANUS



Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus Lucio Cornelio Ciceroni salutem dicit

Sometimes a joke is appropriate and sometimes it is not.  If Quintus Fabius Maximus had known and been friends with Quinta Fabia Drusilla that might have been one thing, but I suspect he is not; therefore, he has not earned the right to joke in the sexist manner in which he did.  He is also NOT the pater familias of Gens Fabia.  He is ONLY the pater familias of ONE -- himself.

Vale;

Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus

On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 12:46 PM, Lucius Cornelius Cicero <Cicero@.... za> wrote:


Ever heard of a joke, you two? Guess not. Despicable the way you'll try and turn anything into something that can be used for political advantage.

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com, David Kling <tau.athanasios@ ...> wrote:
>
> Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus Quintae Fabiae Drusillae salutem dicit
>
> I too am now a Fabia and Quintus Fabius Maximus is NOT my pater familias.
> He is not your pater familias either, and his insinuation that he is
> acknowledges he has no understanding of the gens reform of several years
> ago.
>
> Again I appreciate your support.
>
> Vale;
>
> Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus



Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66095 From: lathyrus77 Date: 2009-05-26
Subject: Re: A vote for NR is a vote for Cato
And this is exactly why I left. As soon as the censors have in to sulla's demands when he threatened a lawsuit, I knew that it was going to be standard operating procedure for him from then on. And I was right.

People of NR, you need to protect yourselves from this menace called sulla. Its obvious your leadership can't or won't so the citizens need to be more proactive if they want to keep NR from being sued to death or else remain under the tyranny of sulla and his lawyer.

I quit the senate cause I don't want to be sued. I quit NR because any organization that allows for such a repugnant man to remain is not an org I would want to be associated with.

Good luck Nova Roma, you're gonna need it.

-Anna


--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Robert Woolwine" <l_cornelius_sulla@...> wrote:
>
> Let's also keep in mind. Cato will not peruse personal vendettas. Whereas Modianus has ALWAYS done that (Cincinnatus, Cassius, Me). It's just when he comes to try to deal with me. I will fight back. With Modianus as Censor he will take NR into a lawsuit. NR will lose. Modianus will become homeless. Because I will go after him and every single board member who allowed Modianus to break the law and peruse his vendetta. So, unless the board members are willing to put up their own personal funds. Modianus will be the cause of the one thing that can potentially end the organization- a lawsuit.
>
> Vale,
>
> Sulla
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66096 From: PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@aol.com Date: 2009-05-26
Subject: Re: MY SUPPORT FOR K. FABIUS BUTEO MODIANUS
Aurelianus Maior sal.

I must say to you that I have met Poplicola and I have always found him to be polite and respectful to women; at the very least he was respectful to his fiance and my wife.   I believe that he may have written a few comments in the heat of a discussion on the lists that are questionable but he is usually quick to offer apologies when someone points this out to him.  I regret that he and Modiane have their differences because I think that they could be good colleagues were they to meet face to face. 

I would also request that you consider reserving some of your generalities when comparing one individual to another without having had the opportunity of long communication and private discussion.

Tibi gratias.


-----Original Message-----
From: Maior <rory12001@...>
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Mon, 25 May 2009 10:42 pm
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: MY SUPPORT FOR K. FABIUS BUTEO MODIANUS



Salvete Modiane et omnes:
thanks for that I appreciate it, Poplicola and Maximus aren't very respectful of women and furthermore viri take the sexist talk to Tartarus, the matrones of Nova Roma deserve your respect.
bene valete in pacem deorum
Marca Hortensia Maior

> Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus Lucio Cornelio Ciceroni salutem dicit
>
> Sometimes a joke is appropriate and sometimes it is not. If Quintus Fabius
> Maximus had known and been friends with Quinta Fabia Drusilla that might
> have been one thing, but I suspect he is not; therefore, he has not earned
> the right to joke in the sexist manner in which he did. He is also NOT the
> pater familias of Gens Fabia. He is ONLY the pater familias of ONE --
> himself.
>
> Vale;
>
> Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus
>
> On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 12:46 PM, Lucius Cornelius Cicero
> <Cicero@...> wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > Ever heard of a joke, you two? Guess not. Despicable the way you'll try and
> > turn anything into something that can be used for political advantage.
> >
> > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com <Nova-Roma%40yahoog roups.com> , David
> > Kling <tau.athanasios@ > wrote:
> > >
> > > Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus Quintae Fabiae Drusillae salutem dicit
> > >
> > > I too am now a Fabia and Quintus Fabius Maximus is NOT my pater familias.
> > > He is not your pater familias either, and his insinuation that he is
> > > acknowledges he has no understanding of the gens reform of several years
> > > ago.
> > >
> > > Again I appreciate your support.
> > >
> > > Vale;
> > >
> > > Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus
> >
> >
> >
> >
>

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66097 From: Timothy or Stephen Gallagher Date: 2009-05-26
Subject: Edictum Censor Tiberius Galerius Paulinus Census of Nova Roma 2762
 Ex Officio

Edictum Censor Tiberius Galerius Paulinus Census of Nova Roma 2762

 
I. NOVA ROMA will be conducting its biannual census of citizens
from June 16th to September 7, 2762 (2009).

II. If you have voted, paid your taxes (annual fee) or joined within
the current year, then you have already been counted. If you have
done none of these things, then we request that you now participate
in the Census.
 
III. Those who do respond (which takes only seconds) will be counted
as full-fledged citizens of Nova Roma. Those who do not respond to
email, paper mail, or telephone call will be reclassified as a
"Socius" (Ally) rather than a citizen, and will thereafter be unable
to vote or be a paterfamilias until requesting and regaining citizen
status.
 
IV. To register yourself as a citizen, go to:
 
http://www.novaroma.org/bin/prefs?cmd=census
 
...and log in with your Roman Name and password. (If you've
 forgotten your password you may easily reset it from here).
 
V. OR, you may simply reply to this message and state that you are
registering as a citizen (give your Roman name if you remember it so
we can be sure to credit the right person).
 
VI. To check whether you are already registered, go to the web site's
Album Civium:
 
http://www.novaroma.org/civitas/album
 
..type in your name, and then click on your picture or
your name to load your personal profile page. There, you will see
either "Active" or "Inactive" next to the label "Status"; to instantly
move from Inactive to Active, go to the census page as described above.

VII. All those who are now listed as inactive and prior to the start of
the census were enrolled as citizens having voting rights shall
retain their voter codes, century assignment, tribal assignment until the close of the census.


Those that have not responded to the census and are classified thereafter as inactive shall have their voter codes rescinded.

VIII. This Edictum becomes effective immediately.
 
Given this the 26th of May 2762
 
a.d. VII Kal. lun. MMDCCLXII A.U.C.
 
Tiberius Galerius Paulinus
Censor


Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66098 From: PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@aol.com Date: 2009-05-26
Subject: Re: MY SUPPORT FOR K. FABIUS BUTEO MODIANUS
Actually, sexist jokes can be quite funny.  Take for instance:

Women have many faults,
Men have only two.
Everything we say
And everything we do.

Fl. Galerius Aurelianus


-----Original Message-----
From: violetphearsen@...
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tue, 26 May 2009 7:39 am
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: MY SUPPORT FOR K. FABIUS BUTEO MODIANUS



I agree. I have sometimes been appalled by the lack of respect shown to the women of Nova Roma by some of the men. Sexist jokes are never funny.
And Modianus is right. I remember when I joined, all the Gens were listed in the feminine form.
 
Maxima Valeria Messallina


--- On Mon, 5/25/09, Maior <rory12001@yahoo. com> wrote:

From: Maior <rory12001@yahoo. com>
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: MY SUPPORT FOR K. FABIUS BUTEO MODIANUS
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com
Date: Monday, May 25, 2009, 8:42 PM

Salvete Modiane et omnes:
thanks for that I appreciate it, Poplicola and Maximus aren't very respectful of women and furthermore viri take the sexist talk to Tartarus, the matrones of Nova Roma deserve your respect.
bene valete in pacem deorum
Marca Hortensia Maior

> Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus Lucio Cornelio Ciceroni salutem dicit
>
> Sometimes a joke is appropriate and sometimes it is not. If Quintus Fabius
> Maximus had known and been friends with Quinta Fabia Drusilla that might
> have been one thing, but I suspect he is not; therefore, he has not earned
> the right to joke in the sexist manner in which he did. He is also NOT the
> pater familias of Gens Fabia. He is ONLY the pater familias of ONE --
> himself.
>
> Vale;
>
> Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus
>
> On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 12:46 PM, Lucius Cornelius Cicero
> <Cicero@...> wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > Ever heard of a joke, you two? Guess not. Despicable the way you'll try and
> > turn anything into something that can be used for political advantage.
> >
> > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com <Nova-Roma%40yahoog roups.com> , David
> > Kling <tau.athanasios@ > wrote:
> > >
> > > Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus Quintae Fabiae Drusillae salutem dicit
> > >
> > > I too am now a Fabia and Quintus Fabius Maximus is NOT my pater familias.
> > > He is not your pater familias either, and his insinuation that he is
> > > acknowledges he has no understanding of the gens reform of several years
> > > ago.
> > >
> > > Again I appreciate your support.
> > >
> > > Vale;
> > >
> > > Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus
> >
> >
> >
> >
>


Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66099 From: PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@aol.com Date: 2009-05-26
Subject: Re: A vote for NR is a vote for Cato
Sulla,

SUE AND BE DAMNED.  NR is not going to back down from your threats anymore.

Fl. Galerius Aurelianus


-----Original Message-----
From: Robert Woolwine <l_cornelius_sulla@...>
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tue, 26 May 2009 8:56 am
Subject: [Nova-Roma] A vote for NR is a vote for Cato



Let's also keep in mind. Cato will not peruse personal vendettas. Whereas Modianus has ALWAYS done that (Cincinnatus, Cassius, Me). It's just when he comes to try to deal with me. I will fight back. With Modianus as Censor he will take NR into a lawsuit. NR will lose. Modianus will become homeless. Because I will go after him and every single board member who allowed Modianus to break the law and peruse his vendetta. So, unless the board members are willing to put up their own personal funds. Modianus will be the cause of the one thing that can potentially end the organization- a lawsuit.

Vale,

Sulla

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com, "Q. Valerius Poplicola" <q.valerius. poplicola@ ...> wrote:
>
> Cato has not done anything to jeopardize our organization; Modianus broke both Nova Roma and US law. Cato has as a Christian promoted the Religio Romana, Modianus only knows how to bash Christianity. Cato has promoted many ideas about law reform to better our organization; Modianus took a break because life was too hectic for him at the time, and now only is running to spite Cato.
>
> Regardless of whether Modianus' candidacy is legal or illegal, he's clearly the inferior candidate.
>
> GO CATO!
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com, "Maior" <rory12001@> wrote:
> >
> > Salvete;
> > he's been censor and he conducted himself with impartiality and dignitas.
> > now please let's not have a hate-Modianus/ Cato exercise. Talk about positive aspects of your candidate.
> > Marca Hortensia Maior
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Today you wrote, "Nova Roma is about people. Bringing people together who
> > > have a common love of Rome and her history and culture. The mud slinging
> > > and the fighting is only ancilliary to what it is all really about!"
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > I hope you remember these words if you are elected Censor.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Vale,
> > >
> > > Potitus
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > _____
> > >
> > > From: Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com [mailto:Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com] On Behalf
> > > Of David Kling
> > > Sent: Monday, May 25, 2009 7:41 PM
> > > To: Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com
> > > Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Sulla's rebuttal - Re: Nova-Roma is life
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus C. Petronio salutem dicit
> > >
> > > Exactly. Nova Roma is NOT simply an on-line thing. Several years ago I
> > > attended a provincial event that included an oratory competition between
> > > Marcus Octavius Gracchus and Marcus Bianchius Antonius at a park in
> > > Columbus, Ohio. I now live in Columbus (just north actually) and was at a
> > > local park with my girlfriend. I looked over and said, "Oh. That was the
> > > site of an oratory competition and provincial event in Nova Roma." I stood
> > > there and thought about that occassion pleasantly. It is memories like that
> > > one, and others, that have captivated me -- and drawn me closer to the dream
> > > of Nova Roma.
> > >
> > > Nova Roma is about people. Bringing people together who have a common love
> > > of Rome and her history and culture. The mud slinging and the fighting is
> > > only ancilliary to what it is all really about!
> > >
> > > I'm pleased you had a good time at the Floralia, and I commend Lentulus for
> > > organizing such a wonderful event. It is my hope to eventually come to
> > > Europe and connect with Nova Romans there!
> > >
> > > Vale;
> > >
> > > Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus
> > >
> >
>

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66100 From: Timothy or Stephen Gallagher Date: 2009-05-26
Subject: JOKES
Salve
 
Two Romans walk into a bar...................................................ouch
 
 
Vale
 
Paulinus
 

To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
From: violetphearsen@...
Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 05:39:50 -0700
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: MY SUPPORT FOR K. FABIUS BUTEO MODIANUS



I agree. I have sometimes been appalled by the lack of respect shown to the women of Nova Roma by some of the men. Sexist jokes are never funny.
And Modianus is right. I remember when I joined, all the Gens were listed in the feminine form.
 
Maxima Valeria Messallina


--- On Mon, 5/25/09, Maior <rory12001@yahoo. com> wrote:

From: Maior <rory12001@yahoo. com>
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: MY SUPPORT FOR K. FABIUS BUTEO MODIANUS
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com
Date: Monday, May 25, 2009, 8:42 PM

Salvete Modiane et omnes:
thanks for that I appreciate it, Poplicola and Maximus aren't very respectful of women and furthermore viri take the sexist talk to Tartarus, the matrones of Nova Roma deserve your respect.
bene valete in pacem deorum
Marca Hortensia Maior

> Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus Lucio Cornelio Ciceroni salutem dicit
>
> Sometimes a joke is appropriate and sometimes it is not. If Quintus Fabius
> Maximus had known and been friends with Quinta Fabia Drusilla that might
> have been one thing, but I suspect he is not; therefore, he has not earned
> the right to joke in the sexist manner in which he did. He is also NOT the
> pater familias of Gens Fabia. He is ONLY the pater familias of ONE --
> himself.
>
> Vale;
>
> Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus
>
> On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 12:46 PM, Lucius Cornelius Cicero
> <Cicero@...> wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > Ever heard of a joke, you two? Guess not. Despicable the way you'll try and
> > turn anything into something that can be used for political advantage.
> >
> > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com <Nova-Roma%40yahoog roups.com> , David
> > Kling <tau.athanasios@ > wrote:
> > >
> > > Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus Quintae Fabiae Drusillae salutem dicit
> > >
> > > I too am now a Fabia and Quintus Fabius Maximus is NOT my pater familias.
> > > He is not your pater familias either, and his insinuation that he is
> > > acknowledges he has no understanding of the gens reform of several years
> > > ago.
> > >
> > > Again I appreciate your support.
> > >
> > > Vale;
> > >
> > > Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus
> >
> >
> >
> >
>



Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66101 From: Timothy or Stephen Gallagher Date: 2009-05-26
Subject: Bad Roman Jokes
Salvete
 
Teacher: What was the greatest accomplishment of the early Romans?

 
Pupil: Speaking Latin!
 
Teacher: Why did Julius Caesar buy crayons?
 
Student (?) : He wanted to Mark Antony!
 
Valete
 
Paulinus

 

 

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66102 From: L Julia Aquila Date: 2009-05-26
Subject: Re: Bad Roman Jokes
Salvete,

I like this one:

How was the Roman Empire cut in half?

With a pair of Caesars!

Valete

Julia

P.S. Are these in the same category as "blonde" jokes? *teases*
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66103 From: enodia2002 Date: 2009-05-26
Subject: Rosetta Stone Latin
Salvete, quirites!

Has anyone used or reviewed the Rosetta Stone Latin program? I have a gift certificate and am considering it.

Thanks,

V Rutilia
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66104 From: L Julia Aquila Date: 2009-05-26
Subject: Re: Classic Poetry, Prose, Proems
Salvete omnes!

This hour I would like to post some Ioci Antiqui (Ancient Jokes):
Varro on Philosophers:
Finally no sick man dreams anything so unspeakable that some philosopher would not say it.

postremo nemo aegrotus quicquam somniat tam infandum, quod non aliquis dicat philosophus.

(from his satire Eumenides (Menippea Fr. 122 Buecheler = 155
Cèbe Meter: Senarians.).


Cicero says something quite similar in De Divinatione 2.58.119:
"But somehow or other there is nothing that can be said
so absurdly, which would not be said by some one of the philosophers."

Sed nescio quo modo nihil tam absurde dici potest quod non dicatur ab aliquo philosophorum.

From Horation, Epistle to Augustus II.1:
Seeing that you alone carry the weight of so many great
charges, guarding our Italian state with arms, gracing her with
morals, and reforming her with laws, I should sin against the
public weal if with long talk, Caesar, I were to delay your
busy hours.

Cum tot sustineas et tanta negotia solus,
res Italas armis tuteris, moribus ornes,
legibus emendes, in publica commoda peccem,
si longo sermone morer tua tempora, Caesar.


This is funny although not succinct from Aulus Gellius,
Noctes Atticae 1.23.5-13:
17
4It was formerly the custom at Rome for senators to enter the
House with their sons under age. 5In those days, when a
matter of considerable importance had been discussed and
was postponed to the following day, it was voted that no one
should mention the subject of the debate until the matter was
decided. The mother of the young Papirius, who had been in
the House with his father, asked her son what the Fathers had
taken up in the senate. 6The boy replied that it was a secret
and that he could not tell. 7The woman became all the more
eager to hear about it; the secrecy of the matter and the boy's
silence piqued her curiosity; she therefore questioned him
more pressingly and urgently. 8Then the boy, because of his
mother's insistence, resorted to a witty and amusing falsehood.
He said that the senate had discussed the question
whether it seemed more expedient, and to the advantage of
the State, for one man to have two wives or one woman to
have two husbands. 9On hearing this, she is panic-stricken,
rushes excitedly from the house, and carries the news to the
other matrons. 10Next day a crowd of matrons came to the
senate, imploring with tears and entreaties that one woman
might have two husbands rather than one man two wives.
11The senators, as they entered the House, were wondering at
this strange madness of the women and the meaning of such a
demand, 11when young Papirius, stepping forward to the
middle of the House, told in detail what his mother had
insisted on hearing, what he himself had said to her, in fact,
the whole story exactly as it had happened. 13The senate paid
homage to the boy's cleverness and loyalty, but voted that
thereafter boys should not enter the House with their fathers,
save only this Papirius; and the boy was henceforth honoured
with the surname Praetextatus, because of his discretion in
keeping silent and in speaking, while he was still young
enough to wear the purple-bordered gown.

4Mos antea senatoribus Romae fuit in curiam cum praetextatis
filiis introire. 5Tum, cum in senatu res maior quaepiam
consultata eaque in diem posterum prolata est, placuitque,
ut eam rem, super qua tractavissent, ne quis enuntiaret,
priusquam decreta esset, mater Papirii pueri, qui cum
parente suo in curia fuerat, percontata est filium, quidnam
in senatu patres egissent. 6Puer respondit tacendum esse
neque id dici licere. 7Mulier fit audiendi cupidior; secretum
rei et silentium pueri animum eius ad inquirendum everberat:
quaerit igitur compressius violentiusque. 8Tum puer
matre urgente lepidi atque festivi mendacii consilium capit.
Actum in senatu dixit, utrum videretur utilius exque
republica esse, unusne ut duas uxores haberet, an ut una
apud duos nupta esset. 9Hoc illa ubi audivit, animus
compavescit, domo trepidans egreditur ad ceteras matronas.
10Pervenit ad senatum postridie matrum familias caterva;
lacrimantes atque obsecrantes orant, una potius ut duobus
nupta fieret, quam ut uni duae. 11Senatores ingredientes in
curiam, quae illa mulierum intemperies et quid sibi postulatio
istaec vellet, mirabantur. 12Puer Papirius in medium
curiae progressus, quid mater audire institisset, quid ipse
matri dixisset, rem, sicut fuerat, denarrat. 13Senatus fidem
atque ingenium pueri exosculatur, consultum facit, uti posthac
pueri cum patribus in curiam ne introeant, praeter ille
unus Papirius, atque puero postea cognomentum honoris
gratia inditum "Praetextatus" ob tacendi loquendique in
aetate praetextae prudentiam.

Translations by © Michael Hendry 2000-2006

Valete,

Julia
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66105 From: Lucius Cornelius Cicero Date: 2009-05-26
Subject: Re: A vote for NR is a vote for Cato
You do realise that a lawsuit would only succeed if NR is breaking the law? And that the sure way to prevent it from losing or being dissolved is the simply follow the law?

But no, some people here seem to think it's better to close ranks when the law is being broken to protect the organisation. How can it possibly serve the interests of the organisation to keep breaking the law? How can it possibly be in the interests of the organisation to oppose legal efforts at rectifying that? Do you have the great desire to be accessories to lawbreaking?

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "lathyrus77" <lathyrus77@...> wrote:
>
> And this is exactly why I left. As soon as the censors have in to sulla's demands when he threatened a lawsuit, I knew that it was going to be standard operating procedure for him from then on. And I was right.
>
> People of NR, you need to protect yourselves from this menace called sulla. Its obvious your leadership can't or won't so the citizens need to be more proactive if they want to keep NR from being sued to death or else remain under the tyranny of sulla and his lawyer.
>
> I quit the senate cause I don't want to be sued. I quit NR because any organization that allows for such a repugnant man to remain is not an org I would want to be associated with.
>
> Good luck Nova Roma, you're gonna need it.
>
> -Anna
>
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Robert Woolwine" <l_cornelius_sulla@> wrote:
> >
> > Let's also keep in mind. Cato will not peruse personal vendettas. Whereas Modianus has ALWAYS done that (Cincinnatus, Cassius, Me). It's just when he comes to try to deal with me. I will fight back. With Modianus as Censor he will take NR into a lawsuit. NR will lose. Modianus will become homeless. Because I will go after him and every single board member who allowed Modianus to break the law and peruse his vendetta. So, unless the board members are willing to put up their own personal funds. Modianus will be the cause of the one thing that can potentially end the organization- a lawsuit.
> >
> > Vale,
> >
> > Sulla
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66106 From: M.C.C. Date: 2009-05-26
Subject: Edicto censorio: Censo de Nova Roma año 2762 AUC
Ex Officio

Edictum Censor Tiberius Galerius Paulinus: Censo de Nova Roma 2762 AUC

 
I. NOVA ROMA reallizará su censo bianual desde el 16 de junio al 7 de septiembre de 2762 AUC (2009).

II. Quien haya votado, pagado sus impuestos o haya obtenido la ciudadanía durante el presente año está automáticamente incluido en el censo. Los no incluidos en las categorias anteriores deberán participar en el censo.

III. Los que respondan (llevará solo pocos segundos hacerlo) serán contados como ciudadanos de pleno derecho en Nova Roma. Los que no respondan a los correos electronicos, a las cartas en papel o a las llamadas telefónicas serán clasificados como "Socius" (aliados) y por lo tanto n podrán votar o ser paterfamilias hasta que no soliciten su reinclusión como ciudadanos.
 
IV. Para registrase como ciudadanos hay que visitar la web:
 
http://www.novaroma .org/bin/ prefs?cmd= census
 
loguearse con el nobre nova romano y la contraseña (que puede ser facilmente reseteada de esta misma pagina).
 
V. O, podeis sencillamente responder a este mensaje declarando que deseais ser incluidos en el Censo, indicando claramente vuestro nombre nova romano para que no haya problemas de identidad.
 
VI. Para comprobar si ya estais registrados visitad vuestra pagina en el 'Album Civium en la web:
 
http://www.novarom a .org/civitas/ album
 
.introducid vuestro nombre y pinchad sobre vuestra foto o nombre para cargar la pagina de perfil. Vuestro estatus está marcado como"Active" o "Inactive" en el apartado "Status"; para cambiar el estatus seguid las instrucciones del punto IV.


VII. Tutti coloro che al momento sono elencati come inattivi e che prima dell'inizio del censo sono stati registrati come cittadini con diritto di voto, manterranno i loro codici di voto, le loro assegnazioni alle centurie ed alle tribù fino alla fine del censo..


Los que no respondan al censo serán reclasificados como inactivos y se anulará su codigo de votante.

VIII. Este edicto entra en vigor inmediatamente.
 
Dado a 26 de mayo de  2762 AUC
 
a.d. VII Kal. lun. MMDCCLXII A.U.C.
 
Tiberius Galerius Paulinus
Censore
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66107 From: Maior Date: 2009-05-26
Subject: Re: MY SUPPORT FOR K. FABIUS BUTEO MODIANUS
Maior Aureliano spd;
I have known you and respected you for a long time Aureliene and if you say Poplicola isn't like that; I apologize to him. The internet can be a difficult medium.

Being called 'a woman' in my book is the highest compliment there is:)!
bene vale in pacem deorum
Marca Hortensia Maior

>
> I must say to you that I have met Poplicola and I have always found him to be polite and respectful to women; at the very least he was respectful to his fiance and my wife.?? I believe that he may have written a few comments in the heat of a discussion on the lists that are questionable but he is usually quick to offer apologies when someone points this out to him.? I regret that he and Modiane have their differences because I think that they could be good colleagues were they to meet face to face.?
>
> I would also request that you consider reserving some of your generalities when comparing one individual to another without having had the opportunity of long communication and private discussion.
>
> Tibi gratias.
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Maior <rory12001@...>
> To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Mon, 25 May 2009 10:42 pm
> Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: MY SUPPORT FOR K. FABIUS BUTEO MODIANUS
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Salvete Modiane et omnes:
> thanks for that I appreciate it, Poplicola and Maximus aren't very respectful of women and furthermore viri take the sexist talk to Tartarus, the matrones of Nova Roma deserve your respect.
> bene valete in pacem deorum
> Marca Hortensia Maior
>
> > Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus Lucio Cornelio Ciceroni salutem dicit
> >
> > Sometimes a joke is appropriate and sometimes it is not. If Quintus Fabius
> > Maximus had known and been friends with Quinta Fabia Drusilla that might
> > have been one thing, but I suspect he is not; therefore, he has not earned
> > the right to joke in the sexist manner in which he did. He is also NOT the
> > pater familias of Gens Fabia. He is ONLY the pater familias of ONE --
> > himself.
> >
> > Vale;
> >
> > Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus
> >
> > On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 12:46 PM, Lucius Cornelius Cicero
> > <Cicero@>wrote:
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > Ever heard of a joke, you two? Guess not. Despicable the way you'll try and
> > > turn anything into something that can be used for political advantage.
> > >
> > > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com <Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com>, David
> > > Kling <tau.athanasios@> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus Quintae Fabiae Drusillae salutem dicit
> > > >
> > > > I too am now a Fabia and Quintus Fabius Maximus is NOT my pater familias.
> > > > He is not your pater familias either, and his insinuation that he is
> > > > acknowledges he has no understanding of the gens reform of several years
> > > > ago.
> > > >
> > > > Again I appreciate your support.
> > > >
> > > > Vale;
> > > >
> > > > Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66108 From: C. Maria Caeca Date: 2009-05-26
Subject: Re: procedural question
Salve Dominus, et salvete omnes,
 
I assure you, Sir, that I wasn't casting aspersions of any sort.  I just was asking something about which I did not, and should, know.  Thank you, however, for your kind explication.
 
Respectfully,
C. Maria Caeca
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2009 12:21 PM
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] procedural question

The Tribunes may indeed act independently on behalf of the Populi without anyone requesting an action.  However, in this case, I am guilty of letting the candidacy stand without challenge because I was unsure of the exact interpretation of the by-law in question.  I owe the Populi an apology for this error even though I was not absolutely convinced that about the differences and interpretations of the by-law, at the time.

Fl. Galerius Aurelianus


-----Original Message-----
From: C. Maria Caeca <shoshanahathaway@...>
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Fri, 22 May 2009 10:16 pm
Subject: [Nova-Roma] procedural question



Salvete Omnes,

A procedural question, if I may. Must the tribunes receive a r4equest,
either from a citizen or a magistrate to evaluate and pronounce on a legal
action, or can they act independently upon the published action, edict,
candidacy or proposed legislation?

Respectfully,
C. Maria Caeca



No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 8.5.339 / Virus Database: 270.12.40/2135 - Release Date: 05/26/09 08:53:00

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66109 From: QFabiusMaxmi@aol.com Date: 2009-05-26
Subject: Re: Roman political campaigning
In a message dated 5/26/2009 6:49:35 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time, Cicero@... writes:
Feigned indignation and faux outrage to try and whip up political support?
But of course.  We are Roman after all.  It is one feeble effort.
 
Our political campaigns are laughable when compared to the slander, bribery, threats, supporter riots of the Republican Romans.  They'd probably be ashamed of us.
 
Q. Fabius Maximus  
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66110 From: Maior Date: 2009-05-26
Subject: Re: MY SUPPORT FOR K. FABIUS BUTEO MODIANUS
M. Hortensia Maior Quiritibus spd;
frankly I think the quirites are able able to determine K. Fabius Modianus' character and abilities for themselves, without any word from me.

But I would not do my friend justice if I did not write about his character and devotion to Nova Roma; when he was consul and his father was dying he faithfully performed his duties as magistrate. He has true pietas and I respect him deeply. He is also a peacemaker and Nova Roma needs pax.
bene valete in pacem deorum
Marca Hortensia Maior



-- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Maior" <rory12001@...> wrote:
>
> Maior Aureliano spd;
> I have known you and respected you for a long time Aureliene and if you say Poplicola isn't like that; I apologize to him. The internet can be a difficult medium.
>
> Being called 'a woman' in my book is the highest compliment there is:)!
> bene vale in pacem deorum
> Marca Hortensia Maior
>
> >
> > I must say to you that I have met Poplicola and I have always found him to be polite and respectful to women; at the very least he was respectful to his fiance and my wife.?? I believe that he may have written a few comments in the heat of a discussion on the lists that are questionable but he is usually quick to offer apologies when someone points this out to him.? I regret that he and Modiane have their differences because I think that they could be good colleagues were they to meet face to face.?
> >
> > I would also request that you consider reserving some of your generalities when comparing one individual to another without having had the opportunity of long communication and private discussion.
> >
> > Tibi gratias.
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Maior <rory12001@>
> > To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> > Sent: Mon, 25 May 2009 10:42 pm
> > Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: MY SUPPORT FOR K. FABIUS BUTEO MODIANUS
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Salvete Modiane et omnes:
> > thanks for that I appreciate it, Poplicola and Maximus aren't very respectful of women and furthermore viri take the sexist talk to Tartarus, the matrones of Nova Roma deserve your respect.
> > bene valete in pacem deorum
> > Marca Hortensia Maior
> >
> > > Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus Lucio Cornelio Ciceroni salutem dicit
> > >
> > > Sometimes a joke is appropriate and sometimes it is not. If Quintus Fabius
> > > Maximus had known and been friends with Quinta Fabia Drusilla that might
> > > have been one thing, but I suspect he is not; therefore, he has not earned
> > > the right to joke in the sexist manner in which he did. He is also NOT the
> > > pater familias of Gens Fabia. He is ONLY the pater familias of ONE --
> > > himself.
> > >
> > > Vale;
> > >
> > > Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus
> > >
> > > On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 12:46 PM, Lucius Cornelius Cicero
> > > <Cicero@>wrote:
> > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Ever heard of a joke, you two? Guess not. Despicable the way you'll try and
> > > > turn anything into something that can be used for political advantage.
> > > >
> > > > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com <Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com>, David
> > > > Kling <tau.athanasios@> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus Quintae Fabiae Drusillae salutem dicit
> > > > >
> > > > > I too am now a Fabia and Quintus Fabius Maximus is NOT my pater familias.
> > > > > He is not your pater familias either, and his insinuation that he is
> > > > > acknowledges he has no understanding of the gens reform of several years
> > > > > ago.
> > > > >
> > > > > Again I appreciate your support.
> > > > >
> > > > > Vale;
> > > > >
> > > > > Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66111 From: David .C Date: 2009-05-26
Subject: Re: Remembering The Fallen!
Salve
No offence taken. When I celebrate rememberance day here in Canada I personaly think and remember of much more then my fellow canadian soldiers, but all soldiers who have fought and died for what they believed in wether they were in the right or wrong. I know Russia and Canada may not be allies such as canada is with the usa but i'd like to believe that we are friends. Though I was unaware that today was a day of rememberance for the soldiers of russia, but tonight I will have a drink to their memory and the bravery they have shown in many instances such as world war 2 and other large scale wars.
Lucius Julius Julianus
 

To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
From: galerius_of_rome@...
Date: Mon, 25 May 2009 17:33:59 -0700
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Remembering The Fallen!




Salve,

This message is to extend the rememberance of the fallen military here and in Sarmatia (Russia) on this memorial day.Sorry if I have offended anyone.Thank you.

Ap.Galerius Aurelianus




Internet Explorer 8 makes surfing easier. Get it now!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66112 From: livia_plauta Date: 2009-05-26
Subject: Re: A dream come true
L. Livia Plauta A. Tulliae Scholasticae S.P.D.

> >
> > ATS: Surely you don¹t think that everyone there is perfect? Only our
> > deity approaches that, but he admits to errors and is much more modest than
> > one might assume. He has also had to leave even that list, as Lentulus may
> > have informed you.

Excuse me? Avitus is certainly not my deity. I believe you are the only person who considers him such.
Anyway I'm not waiting until I'm perfect to write latin: I'm waiting untils I reach a level that allows an optimal ratio between effort spent in writing and result.


> >
> > ATS: Let us hope that it is not to the detriment of your spoken French!
> > I would like more practice in that, too. Perhaps you are too shy on this
> > matter...

No, I meant that I hope my Latin will get better, not my French worse! Actually my French improved a lot recently due to talking with Dexter.

I wouldn't like a Latin-speaking meeting where one is not allowed to speak even one word in another language.
At my level, I had to ask often about words or expressions, in one of the languages known by the others. However, this did not really disturb the flow of the conversation, while it provided a chance to learn much more efficiently than usual.

I think it's a mistake to plan a meeting with strict selection based on language level. It can be very useful to have mixed levels in this sort of situation.

Optime vale,
Livia
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66113 From: livia_plauta Date: 2009-05-26
Subject: Re: A dream come true
L. Livia Plauta P. Corvae Gaudiali S.P.D.

Actually there was very little time and study involved. These days I'm too busy reading about lawsuit threats on NR mailing lists to have time to study Latin, and my Sermo I course was interrupted, leaving me with a bitter taste.

I'm exlusively living off the high school years (more than 20 years ago), and my Latin knowledge is gradually emerging from the mists of the past.

Vale,
Livia

>
> P. Corva gaudialis L. Liviae Plautae s.p.d.
>
> Wow, that is marvelous!!!
>
> It speaks of much time and study. That is wonderful, to actually be with other Latin speakers and to spend enough time with them to get in some good practice!
>
> The Floralia festival sounds like it was a great succsss. I would have loved to have been there. :)
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "livia_plauta" <livia.plauta@> wrote:
> >
> > I posted this in the Latinitas list, but then I realized that I'd better post it here too, because at least one good friend of mine is still banned from that list.
> > More reports about Floralia are forthcoming.
> >
> > L. Livia Plauta omnibus sodalibus S.P:D.
> >
> > Over the weekend, as we announced on many lists already, we Novi Romani from Pannonia had a big role in the Floralia festival at the Aquincum Museum here in Budapest.
> > We held a big sacrifice to various gods in honour of the two-thousandth anniversary of the creation of Pannonia, we held a roman fashion show, we demonstrated how a roman marriage by confarreatio and a trial took place.
> >
> > We had guests from three countries: Sex. Lucilius Tutor and his girlfriend from the Czech Republic, A. Apollonius Cordus from London, and C. Petronius Dexter from Paris.
> >
> > The good news is that four of us: A. Apollonius Cordus, C. Petronius Dexter, Cn. Cornelius Lentulus and myself were able to speak Latin for hours on end, at the festival location, at the restaurant, and at my place.
> > I knew the three men I mentioned are all excellent latinists, and I had no doubt they could speak Latin fluently, but the biggest surprise for me came from myself. I didn't consider myself latine loquens, so I was quite surprised when I found myself speaking Latin, with mistakes, of course, and having to ask help for words or phrases, but for hours, and on every sort of topic.
> > I think the biggest merit goes to Cordus, who is so dedicated to living latin that he answers in latin even when addressed in English.
> >
> > Anyway one of my biggest dreams came true this weekend, the dream of being able to learn Latin the way living languages are usually learned, by interaction with a community of speakers, by trial and error, in connection with everyday situations.
> >
> > This demonstrates that the goals Avitus and Scholastica pursue, of having a community that speaks Latin naturally, as a means of communication, is actually reachable in reality and within Nova Roma.
> >
> > All of us (the four people mentioned above) made a vow to meet again as soon as possible in the future and continue speaking Latin, as we had such a wonderful time together.
> >
> > I now have to consider myself latine loquens, but unfortunately I'm not latine scribens yet.
> > That's why I'm writing this here and not to the Nova Roma latina mailing list.
> > I realized I'm much more shy in writing, and I don't dare see my mistakes in black on white, so for the moment the situation with my Latin is similar to that of my French: I can talk but not write.
> > So far, my spoken French is still way better than my Latin, but I hope that will change soon.
> >
> > Optime valete,
> > Livia
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66114 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2009-05-26
Subject: Re: A dream come true
Cato Liviae Plautae omnibusque in foro SPD

Salvete!

Livia Plauta's off-the-cuff remark struck me, and I began to think. "Hah! Something new and different!" I hear some of you thinking. But Livia Plauta says something that has faint echoes in several citizens' words.

Now I ask myself - and all of you, my fellow citizens - a couple of questions: should we, in fact, care about the law? Should it take up any of our time? Does it enhance or detract from a vision we may have of a restored Respublica? Is it possible to have a restoration of the Respublica *without* the law? Is it possible to be *Roman* without law?

Forget, for a moment, our incorporation as a legal entity in the United States. Imagine that we have no legal responsibilities to anyone other than ourselves - and only if we choose to have them. Forget, as we brushed on a while ago, any ideas of government based on post-Enlightenment political thought to the greatest extent possible. How would we function?

Cicero defined a respublica as a community which shared a common interest and a common law. What would we be left with if we were, in our Respublica, connected only by a common interest? No law, and no government (because government by its very definition requires the application of authority based on law). Would a common interest serve to act as the foundation of a Respublica, or would it create simply another online interest group that inspires a few people to meet up every now and then? Would we be any more than a delayed-action chat room?

(By the way, I think the Floralia gathering was an extraordinary event and applaud all of you who took part)

So while some express their severe disgust for the law, and others are merely irritated by it, without it what do we have - and do we really want what would be left without it?

Valete!

Cato
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66115 From: David Kling Date: 2009-05-26
Subject: Re: A dream come true
"Forget, for a moment, our incorporation as a legal entity in the United States."

How can we forget when we have citizens, like yourself, who call the attorney general's office?  Issue complaints, and cause all sorts of mayhem while spouting accusations and calling for new elections of our consules!

You cannot have it both ways.

Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus

On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 8:54 PM, Gaius Equitius Cato <mlcinnyc@...> wrote:


Cato Liviae Plautae omnibusque in foro SPD

Salvete!

Livia Plauta's off-the-cuff remark struck me, and I began to think. "Hah! Something new and different!" I hear some of you thinking. But Livia Plauta says something that has faint echoes in several citizens' words.

Now I ask myself - and all of you, my fellow citizens - a couple of questions: should we, in fact, care about the law? Should it take up any of our time? Does it enhance or detract from a vision we may have of a restored Respublica? Is it possible to have a restoration of the Respublica *without* the law? Is it possible to be *Roman* without law?

Forget, for a moment, our incorporation as a legal entity in the United States. Imagine that we have no legal responsibilities to anyone other than ourselves - and only if we choose to have them. Forget, as we brushed on a while ago, any ideas of government based on post-Enlightenment political thought to the greatest extent possible. How would we function?

Cicero defined a respublica as a community which shared a common interest and a common law. What would we be left with if we were, in our Respublica, connected only by a common interest? No law, and no government (because government by its very definition requires the application of authority based on law). Would a common interest serve to act as the foundation of a Respublica, or would it create simply another online interest group that inspires a few people to meet up every now and then? Would we be any more than a delayed-action chat room?

(By the way, I think the Floralia gathering was an extraordinary event and applaud all of you who took part)

So while some express their severe disgust for the law, and others are merely irritated by it, without it what do we have - and do we really want what would be left without it?

Valete!

Cato


Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66116 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2009-05-26
Subject: Re: A dream come true
Cato Fabio Modiano sal.

Salve!

Step back for just a moment and read very carefully what I wrote.

I am asking our citizens to imagine a clean slate - a tabula rasa, if you will - and going from there.

You need to chill out a little.

Don't forget that your rash action - as censor last term, which you knew was illegal and which was overturned by the Senate - was the primary reason for that whole chain of events.

Vale!

Cato



--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, David Kling <tau.athanasios@...> wrote:
>
> "Forget, for a moment, our incorporation as a legal entity in the United
> States."
>
> How can we forget when we have citizens, like yourself, who call the
> attorney general's office? Issue complaints, and cause all sorts of mayhem
> while spouting accusations and calling for new elections of our consules!
>
> You cannot have it both ways.
>
> Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus
>
> On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 8:54 PM, Gaius Equitius Cato <mlcinnyc@...>wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > Cato Liviae Plautae omnibusque in foro SPD
> >
> > Salvete!
> >
> > Livia Plauta's off-the-cuff remark struck me, and I began to think. "Hah!
> > Something new and different!" I hear some of you thinking. But Livia Plauta
> > says something that has faint echoes in several citizens' words.
> >
> > Now I ask myself - and all of you, my fellow citizens - a couple of
> > questions: should we, in fact, care about the law? Should it take up any of
> > our time? Does it enhance or detract from a vision we may have of a restored
> > Respublica? Is it possible to have a restoration of the Respublica *without*
> > the law? Is it possible to be *Roman* without law?
> >
> > Forget, for a moment, our incorporation as a legal entity in the United
> > States. Imagine that we have no legal responsibilities to anyone other than
> > ourselves - and only if we choose to have them. Forget, as we brushed on a
> > while ago, any ideas of government based on post-Enlightenment political
> > thought to the greatest extent possible. How would we function?
> >
> > Cicero defined a respublica as a community which shared a common interest
> > and a common law. What would we be left with if we were, in our Respublica,
> > connected only by a common interest? No law, and no government (because
> > government by its very definition requires the application of authority
> > based on law). Would a common interest serve to act as the foundation of a
> > Respublica, or would it create simply another online interest group that
> > inspires a few people to meet up every now and then? Would we be any more
> > than a delayed-action chat room?
> >
> > (By the way, I think the Floralia gathering was an extraordinary event and
> > applaud all of you who took part)
> >
> > So while some express their severe disgust for the law, and others are
> > merely irritated by it, without it what do we have - and do we really want
> > what would be left without it?
> >
> > Valete!
> >
> > Cato
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66117 From: Maior Date: 2009-05-26
Subject: Re: A dream come true
Salve Cato:
I'm not disgusted by the law, I find Roman law interesting, but when it occupies the main part of Nova Roman life, then something is seriously out of proportion.

As for Modianus, when he removed Sulla from the Senate, he didn't have the power and it was wrong. But it was Sulla who served attorney's papers to the Senate threatening us with a lawsuit.

Any other NR citizen would have demanded to get back via the praetors or the consuls. That's the way it should be - internal.

bene vale
M. Hortensia Maior
here is an article Agricola and I started on Roman Law over at the NRwiki, I suggest the law lovers work on that rather than ML strife.
http://www.novaroma.org/nr/Roman_laws
>
> Cato Fabio Modiano sal.
>
> Salve!
>
> Step back for just a moment and read very carefully what I wrote.
>
> I am asking our citizens to imagine a clean slate - a tabula rasa, if you will - and going from there.
>
> You need to chill out a little.
>
> Don't forget that your rash action - as censor last term, which you knew was illegal and which was overturned by the Senate - was the primary reason for that whole chain of events.
>
> Vale!
>
> Cato
>
>
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, David Kling <tau.athanasios@> wrote:
> >
> > "Forget, for a moment, our incorporation as a legal entity in the United
> > States."
> >
> > How can we forget when we have citizens, like yourself, who call the
> > attorney general's office? Issue complaints, and cause all sorts of mayhem
> > while spouting accusations and calling for new elections of our consules!
> >
> > You cannot have it both ways.
> >
> > Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus
> >
> > On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 8:54 PM, Gaius Equitius Cato <mlcinnyc@>wrote:
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > Cato Liviae Plautae omnibusque in foro SPD
> > >
> > > Salvete!
> > >
> > > Livia Plauta's off-the-cuff remark struck me, and I began to think. "Hah!
> > > Something new and different!" I hear some of you thinking. But Livia Plauta
> > > says something that has faint echoes in several citizens' words.
> > >
> > > Now I ask myself - and all of you, my fellow citizens - a couple of
> > > questions: should we, in fact, care about the law? Should it take up any of
> > > our time? Does it enhance or detract from a vision we may have of a restored
> > > Respublica? Is it possible to have a restoration of the Respublica *without*
> > > the law? Is it possible to be *Roman* without law?
> > >
> > > Forget, for a moment, our incorporation as a legal entity in the United
> > > States. Imagine that we have no legal responsibilities to anyone other than
> > > ourselves - and only if we choose to have them. Forget, as we brushed on a
> > > while ago, any ideas of government based on post-Enlightenment political
> > > thought to the greatest extent possible. How would we function?
> > >
> > > Cicero defined a respublica as a community which shared a common interest
> > > and a common law. What would we be left with if we were, in our Respublica,
> > > connected only by a common interest? No law, and no government (because
> > > government by its very definition requires the application of authority
> > > based on law). Would a common interest serve to act as the foundation of a
> > > Respublica, or would it create simply another online interest group that
> > > inspires a few people to meet up every now and then? Would we be any more
> > > than a delayed-action chat room?
> > >
> > > (By the way, I think the Floralia gathering was an extraordinary event and
> > > applaud all of you who took part)
> > >
> > > So while some express their severe disgust for the law, and others are
> > > merely irritated by it, without it what do we have - and do we really want
> > > what would be left without it?
> > >
> > > Valete!
> > >
> > > Cato
> > >
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66118 From: M. Lucretius Agricola Date: 2009-05-26
Subject: Re: Voting procedures reminder
Agricola Omnibus S.P.D.

As I write I see just over 3 hours remaining in the first phase of our election.

In the first phase, only the "centuria praerogativa" is allowed to vote. This time it is century 14.

Some citizens from other centuries have cast ballots as well, but the Lex Fabia de ratione comitiorum centuriatorum prohibits those from being counted. Those citizens WILL be able to vote again, in either phase 2 or phase 3 of the process, as outlined below.

Citizens may check their currently assigned century by looking in the Album Civium http://www.novaroma.org/civitas/album Please note that the century assignments were changed just before the election, so citizens are advised to re-check their centuries.

All magistrates extend their thanks to all who have voted thus far, but we would ask that those who have voted outside of the proper time to re-vote at the correct time.

Thus far ballots 7003, 7004, 7005, 7006, 7008, 7009, 7010 have been reported by the diribitores as cast at the wrong time.

Note that anyone in century 14 who has not yet voted may vote at any time before the final closing of the cista at the end of phase 3.


I add my personal note of thanks to all the diribitores and to my colleague, Cn. Lentulus, for their work thus far, and to all those who have thus far shown their community spirit by voting.


Valete






--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "M. Lucretius Agricola" <marcus.lucretius@...> wrote:
>
> Agricola omnibus S.P.D.
>
>
>
> I would ask all citizen to read the following message completely.
>
>
>
> Our Lex Fabia de ratione comitiorum centuriatorum says in part:
>
> "A century from the first class shall be selected by lot by the diribitores to vote first. No century containing only one member shall be selected for this purpose. For the first 48 hours of the voting period only members of that century shall be permitted to vote."
>
> This is the "centuria praerogativa" and the diribitores selected centuria XIV, that is, century 14, for this honor.
>
> Since we are still within that first 48 hour period, any votes from citizens OTHER THAN centuria XIV cannot be counted.
>
> IF YOU HAVE VOTED ALREADY, YOUR VOTE CANNOT BE COUNTED UNLESS YOU ARE IN CENTURY 14. Anyone who voted too early will be able to re-vote later, at the correct time. Not sure if you are in this century? Check here: http://www.novaroma.org/civitas/album?cmd=show-century¢ury=14
>
> REMEMBER, Your century will have changed just before the election, so you must check your century in the Album Civium http://www.novaroma.org/civitas/album . You can simply search for yourself and read your century from your page.
>
>
> Our website explains voting by centuries, and here I have added notes and broken this text down to show clearly the three phases of voting:
>
> 1. During the first forty-eight hours of voting, only [the chosen] century is permitted to vote. At the end of that time, the diribitores will announce the results of the vote as they stand from that century.
>
> 2. Next, the entire first class [that is, centuries 1 through 14, inclusive], becomes eligible to vote. At the end of this second forty-eight hours of voting the diribitores will announce the results of the entire first class.
>
> 3. Finally, all the centuries become eligible to vote, for the remainder of the voting period. At no time in this do the centuria praerogativa or the first class become ineligible to vote. They may vote from the beginning of their voting time to the end of voting.
>
> The schedule for these three phases is posted on the election page, here: http://www.novaroma.org/nr/Election_Maius_MMDCCLXII_(Nova_Roma)
>
>
>
> Finally, please remember to take note of your BALLOT NUMBER. Problem ballots will be announced by BALLOT NUMBER.
>
>
> Thank you all for reading this and optime valete!
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66119 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2009-05-26
Subject: Re: A dream come true
Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: A dream come true

  A. Tullia Scholastica L. Liviae Plautae quiritibus, sociis, peregrinisque bonae voluntatis S.P.D.

  

L. Livia Plauta A. Tulliae Scholasticae S.P.D.

> >
> >     ATS:  Surely you don’t think that everyone there is perfect?  Only our
> > deity approaches that, but he admits to errors and is much more modest than
> > one might assume.  He has also had to leave even that list, as Lentulus may
> > have informed you.

Excuse me? Avitus is certainly not my deity. I believe you are the only person who considers him such.

    ATS2:  Are you humor-impaired, too?  Or is it this nasty election?  Avitus is highly regarded by everyone who knows his abilities.  He is well-known for his fluency in Latin, and for his advocacy of living Latin.  He is the best among us, and as the fellow chess players of a young man of my acquaintance used to refer to him as deity (he then had a high ranking, something like 2000 points, in chess tournaments), so, too, I refer to Avitus as deity.  I do not offer him wine, incense, mola salsa, or assorted barnyard animals, even if I could afford them and knew what to do.  Consult Lentulus on that.  


Anyway I'm not waiting until I'm perfect to write latin: I'm waiting untils I reach a level that allows an optimal ratio between effort spent in writing and result.

    ATS2:  Yes, that is a goal, and a wise way to reach it.  

> >
> >     ATS:  Let us hope that it is not to the detriment of your spoken French!
> > I would like more practice in that, too.  Perhaps you are too shy on this
> > matter...

No, I meant that I hope my Latin will get better, not my French worse! Actually my French improved a lot recently due to talking with Dexter.

    ATS2:  Of course.  It helps to be with a native speaker.  

I wouldn't like a Latin-speaking meeting where one is not allowed to speak even one word in another language.

    ATS2:  The Conventicula and Rusticationes are not meetings; they are week-long Latin immersion seminars, specifically designed for that purpose.  Everyone enters with that understanding.  Moreover, one is allowed to ask for meanings, and there are some events, such as the final banquet, where the vernacular is allowed.  English speakers may need stricter rules than Europeans, for we live in a huge continent with two languages, English and Quebecois French, near a host of countries speaking a third language, Spanish, and can travel for thousands of miles without having to speak another language.  That is not the case in Europe, unless it has either expanded greatly since I checked the map or adopted one single language.  Europeans are pretty well forced to learn other languages; Americans tend to regard mandatory junior-high Spanish (or any other language) as a form of academic torture.  

At my level, I had to ask often about words or expressions, in one of the languages known by the others.

    ATS2:  As above, one is allowed to ask the moderators, or more advanced participants, for meanings.  We would be rather tongue-tied if we did not.  Note, too, that vocabulary lists were provided in advance, and so were homework exercises.

However, this did not really disturb the flow of the conversation, while it provided a chance to learn much more efficiently than usual.

    ATS2:  Indeed.  

I think it's a mistake to plan a meeting with strict selection based on language level. It can be very useful to have mixed levels in this sort of situation.

    ATS2:  You misunderstand.  My group had everything from undergraduates with maybe two years of Latin to very advanced speakers who attended several such conventicula every year, and were very fluent.  Last year that group had a high school student.  The Rusticatio Virginiana and some of the other ones have special sessions for the less advanced participants precisely so that they are not intimidated by more advanced speakers in their midst, and so that the moderators can adjust their level of instruction.  Sounds good to me. The more advanced group simply is just that, more advanced, not necessarily all very advanced speakers, though the ALF in Europe probably is comprised entirely of rather advanced Latin speakers.  I might add that the local, non-immersion conventiculum I attended last summer was little help to me, for it was attended almost exclusively by local Latin teachers who had never ventured into any spoken Latin beyond Salve(te) and were less able than the rawest beginner in the immersion conventiculum.  The one-room schoolhouse does not work well; some tracking is a good idea. It was painful to see colleagues I have known for years, if not decades, struggling to utter a few words in a language they have taught for many long years.  In one year of Sermo Latinus, I learned to out-talk them, and I am still not as fluent as I would like.

Optime vale,
Livia

Optime vale et valete.  

  
    
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66120 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2009-05-26
Subject: Re: A dream come true
Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: A dream come true

  
A. Tullia Scholastica iterum L. Liviae Plautae et P. Corvae Gaudiali quiritibus, sociis, peregrinisque bonae voluntatis S.P.D.
  

L. Livia Plauta P. Corvae Gaudiali S.P.D.

Actually there was very little time and study involved. These days I'm too busy reading about lawsuit threats on NR mailing lists to have time to study Latin,

    ATS:  LOL!  Which is worse on this topic, the ML or the BA?  


and my Sermo I course was interrupted, leaving me with a bitter taste.

    ATS:  Your Sermo I course was interrupted because...guess what?  The server broke, and Saturninus said he did not have time to fix it!  Several students vanished over the winter break, as always, and several quit outright, but some of your group will finish Sermo I if they take and pass the examination.  The majority of the survivors have submitted the last assignment a bit belatedly, and will soon receive the corrections for that.  Your onsite attack on Avitus, too, did not endear you to us, but if you can hold your tongue, you will be welcome to rejoin the class in its next run.  

    In spite of the server problems, ALL intermediate students in both Sermo and Grammatica stand to finish the courses (they must complete and pass the final examination), and most of the Grammatica I students have already completed the course.   One did not receive my e-mails with the lessons, and will take the course again next year.  No one else griped about this situation; you are the only one who did not bear this situation with equanimity.  It has not been easy for any of us, especially for Avitus and me.  

I'm exlusively living off the high school years (more than 20 years ago), and my Latin knowledge is gradually emerging from the mists of the past.

Vale,
Livia

Vale, et valete.  



>
> P. Corva gaudialis L. Liviae Plautae s.p.d.
>
> Wow, that is marvelous!!!
>
> It speaks of much time and study.  That is wonderful, to actually be with other Latin speakers and to spend enough time with them to get in some good practice!
>
> The Floralia festival sounds like it was a great succsss.  I would have loved to have been there.  :)
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com <mailto:Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com> , "livia_plauta" <livia.plauta@> wrote:
> >
> > I posted this in the Latinitas list, but then I realized that I'd better post it here too, because at least one good friend of mine is still banned from that list.
> > More reports about Floralia are forthcoming.
> >
> > L. Livia Plauta omnibus sodalibus S.P:D.
> >
> > Over the weekend, as we announced on many lists already, we Novi Romani from Pannonia had a big role in the Floralia festival at the Aquincum Museum here in Budapest.
> > We held a big sacrifice to various gods in honour of the two-thousandth anniversary of the creation of Pannonia, we held a roman fashion show, we demonstrated how a roman marriage by confarreatio and a trial took place.
> >
> > We had guests from three countries: Sex. Lucilius Tutor and his girlfriend from the Czech Republic, A. Apollonius Cordus from London, and C. Petronius Dexter from Paris.
> >
> > The good news is that four of us: A. Apollonius Cordus, C. Petronius Dexter, Cn. Cornelius Lentulus and myself were able to speak Latin for hours on end, at the festival location, at the restaurant, and at my place.
> > I knew the three men I mentioned are all excellent latinists, and I had no doubt they could speak Latin fluently, but the biggest surprise for me came from myself. I didn't consider myself latine loquens, so I was quite surprised when I found myself speaking Latin, with mistakes, of course, and having to ask help for words or phrases, but for hours, and on every sort of topic.
> > I think the biggest merit goes to Cordus, who is so dedicated to living latin that he answers in latin even when addressed in English.
> >
> > Anyway one of my biggest dreams came true this weekend, the dream of being able to learn Latin the way living languages are usually learned, by interaction with a community of speakers, by trial and error, in connection with everyday situations.
> >
> > This demonstrates that the goals Avitus and Scholastica pursue, of having a community that speaks Latin naturally, as a means of communication, is actually reachable in reality and within Nova Roma.
> >
> > All of us (the four people mentioned above) made a vow to meet again as soon as possible in the future and continue speaking Latin, as we had such a wonderful time together.
> >
> > I now have to consider myself latine loquens, but unfortunately I'm not latine scribens yet.
> > That's why I'm writing this here and not to the Nova Roma latina mailing list.
> > I realized I'm much more shy in writing, and I don't dare see my mistakes in black on white, so for the moment the situation with my Latin is similar to that of my French: I can talk but not write.
> > So far, my spoken French is still way better than my Latin, but I hope that will change soon.
> >
> > Optime valete,
> > Livia
> >
>

  
    
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66121 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2009-05-26
Subject: Re: A dream come true
Re: [Nova-Roma] A dream come true

  
A. Tullia Scholastica Maximae Valeriae Messallinae quiritibus, sociis, peregrinisque bonae voluntatis S.P.D.
  

Wow, sounds like an awesome experience for all. I am so impressed with how much you did in just one weekend. I am looking forward to any videos of the events. How I wish I could have gone.

    ATS:  So do I, but Europe is a tad far for a weekend jaunt...Scotty, when ARE you gonna get that damn transporter fixed?  

I'm so happy for you and you have given me even more incentive to improve my Latin. That should put a smile on Scholastica's face :)

    ATS:  Indeed.  Believe me, there is no comparison to these events, or to Latin immersion, even to the Greges Latini/Circuli Latini, which are Latin-speaking groups which meet periodically for a meal and Latin conversation.  I think there are at least two immersion sessions in California; possibly one also does Roman cooking.  When you get some Latin under your belt, you should look into attending one of them.  There is nothing to be afraid of; with one known exception, the moderators are very tolerant, and kind to the rankest beginners.  

Vale bene in pace Deorum,

Maxima Valeria Messallina

Vale(te) bene in pace deorum.  


--- On Mon, 5/25/09, livia_plauta <livia.plauta@...> wrote:

From: livia_plauta <livia.plauta@...>
Subject: [Nova-Roma] A dream come true
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Date: Monday, May 25, 2009, 7:52 AM

I posted this in the Latinitas list, but then I realized that I'd better post it here too, because at least one good friend of mine is still banned from that list.
More reports about Floralia are forthcoming.

L. Livia Plauta omnibus sodalibus S.P:D.

Over the weekend, as we announced on many lists already, we Novi Romani from Pannonia had a big role in the Floralia festival at the Aquincum Museum here in Budapest.
We held a big sacrifice to various gods in honour of the two-thousandth anniversary of the creation of Pannonia, we held a roman fashion show, we demonstrated how a roman marriage by confarreatio and a trial took place.

We had guests from three countries: Sex. Lucilius Tutor and his girlfriend from the Czech Republic, A. Apollonius Cordus from London, and C. Petronius Dexter from Paris.

The good news is that four of us: A. Apollonius Cordus, C. Petronius Dexter, Cn. Cornelius Lentulus and myself were able to speak Latin for hours on end, at the festival location, at the restaurant, and at my place.
I knew the three men I mentioned are all excellent latinists, and I had no doubt they could speak Latin fluently, but the biggest surprise for me came from myself. I didn't consider myself latine loquens, so I was quite surprised when I found myself speaking Latin, with mistakes, of course, and having to ask help for words or phrases, but for hours, and on every sort of topic.
I think the biggest merit goes to Cordus, who is so dedicated to living latin that he answers in latin even when addressed in English.

Anyway one of my biggest dreams came true this weekend, the dream of being able to learn Latin the way living languages are usually learned, by interaction with a community of speakers, by trial and error, in connection with everyday situations.

This demonstrates that the goals Avitus and Scholastica pursue, of having a community that speaks Latin naturally, as a means of communication, is actually reachable in reality and within Nova Roma.

All of us (the four people mentioned above) made a vow to meet again as soon as possible in the future and continue speaking Latin, as we had such a wonderful time together.

I now have to consider myself latine loquens, but unfortunately I'm not latine scribens yet.
That's why I'm writing this here and not to the Nova Roma latina mailing list.
I realized I'm much more shy in writing, and I don't dare see my mistakes in black on white, so for the moment the situation with my Latin is similar to that of my French: I can talk but not write.
So far, my spoken French is still way better than my Latin, but I hope that will change soon.

Optime valete,
Livia


 
  
    
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66122 From: Terry Boyle Date: 2009-05-26
Subject: Re: A dream come true
     Salve Cato,
 
        I have to say that you have chutzpah. I don't know if I've ever seen anyone endorse themselves before.  Comparing resumes, your candidate is the less qualified one.  I also have a problem with your candidate abruptly quitting the Senate.  What type of guarantee do we have that your candidate will not jump ship once things get too hot in the kitchen next time?
 
        Vale,
 
             QID
 
 
 
 
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2009 9:25 PM
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: A dream come true

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66123 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2009-05-26
Subject: Re: A dream come true
Cato Maiori sal.

Salve!

OK, I understand your point.

The question is then how do you decide what is "too much" law talk? What proportion is ... "correct"? What about people whose primary interest is government and law and politics?

As we've said earlier, the Romans had lots and lots of laws; of course they had several million people to work with, too, but the *idea* of having a lot of laws isn't un-Roman by any stretch of the imagination.

Remember that we are restoring the Respublica - a living mirror of Roman life, and the forum is at the heart of that life.

The reason I asked you to imagine that we are in a place *before* incorporation is that Sulla, whether you like it or not, took the existence of our position under the law - all of the law - to a realistic, logical, if unfortunate conclusion; while we *have* the law we are bound by it, in its entirety, not just the happy feel-like-a-Roman parts.

So do we want the law? If we don't what do we replace it with? If we do, how far do we want it to go?

Vale!

Cato



--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Maior" <rory12001@...> wrote:
>
> Salve Cato:
> I'm not disgusted by the law, I find Roman law interesting, but when it occupies the main part of Nova Roman life, then something is seriously out of proportion.
>
> As for Modianus, when he removed Sulla from the Senate, he didn't have the power and it was wrong. But it was Sulla who served attorney's papers to the Senate threatening us with a lawsuit.
>
> Any other NR citizen would have demanded to get back via the praetors or the consuls. That's the way it should be - internal.
>
> bene vale
> M. Hortensia Maior
> here is an article Agricola and I started on Roman Law over at the NRwiki, I suggest the law lovers work on that rather than ML strife.
> http://www.novaroma.org/nr/Roman_laws
> >
> > Cato Fabio Modiano sal.
> >
> > Salve!
> >
> > Step back for just a moment and read very carefully what I wrote.
> >
> > I am asking our citizens to imagine a clean slate - a tabula rasa, if you will - and going from there.
> >
> > You need to chill out a little.
> >
> > Don't forget that your rash action - as censor last term, which you knew was illegal and which was overturned by the Senate - was the primary reason for that whole chain of events.
> >
> > Vale!
> >
> > Cato
> >
> >
> >
> > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, David Kling <tau.athanasios@> wrote:
> > >
> > > "Forget, for a moment, our incorporation as a legal entity in the United
> > > States."
> > >
> > > How can we forget when we have citizens, like yourself, who call the
> > > attorney general's office? Issue complaints, and cause all sorts of mayhem
> > > while spouting accusations and calling for new elections of our consules!
> > >
> > > You cannot have it both ways.
> > >
> > > Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus
> > >
> > > On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 8:54 PM, Gaius Equitius Cato <mlcinnyc@>wrote:
> > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Cato Liviae Plautae omnibusque in foro SPD
> > > >
> > > > Salvete!
> > > >
> > > > Livia Plauta's off-the-cuff remark struck me, and I began to think. "Hah!
> > > > Something new and different!" I hear some of you thinking. But Livia Plauta
> > > > says something that has faint echoes in several citizens' words.
> > > >
> > > > Now I ask myself - and all of you, my fellow citizens - a couple of
> > > > questions: should we, in fact, care about the law? Should it take up any of
> > > > our time? Does it enhance or detract from a vision we may have of a restored
> > > > Respublica? Is it possible to have a restoration of the Respublica *without*
> > > > the law? Is it possible to be *Roman* without law?
> > > >
> > > > Forget, for a moment, our incorporation as a legal entity in the United
> > > > States. Imagine that we have no legal responsibilities to anyone other than
> > > > ourselves - and only if we choose to have them. Forget, as we brushed on a
> > > > while ago, any ideas of government based on post-Enlightenment political
> > > > thought to the greatest extent possible. How would we function?
> > > >
> > > > Cicero defined a respublica as a community which shared a common interest
> > > > and a common law. What would we be left with if we were, in our Respublica,
> > > > connected only by a common interest? No law, and no government (because
> > > > government by its very definition requires the application of authority
> > > > based on law). Would a common interest serve to act as the foundation of a
> > > > Respublica, or would it create simply another online interest group that
> > > > inspires a few people to meet up every now and then? Would we be any more
> > > > than a delayed-action chat room?
> > > >
> > > > (By the way, I think the Floralia gathering was an extraordinary event and
> > > > applaud all of you who took part)
> > > >
> > > > So while some express their severe disgust for the law, and others are
> > > > merely irritated by it, without it what do we have - and do we really want
> > > > what would be left without it?
> > > >
> > > > Valete!
> > > >
> > > > Cato
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66124 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2009-05-26
Subject: Re: A dream come true
Cato QID sal.

Salve!

Of course you've seen candidates endorse themselves! Whenever they declare a candidacy for something they are saying, "I have what it takes to get this job done - and more!"

Perhaps I have more to learn, technical-minded, than the other gentleman.

But there is a huge, vast, yawning chasm of a difference between learning technical stuff and a commitment to doing what is best regardless of who may have (or may not have) a particular interest in the outcome.

As for resigning - yep, I did it! And yep, it was a mistake. How can we guarantee that the other candidate won't abuse his power in office again if he's elected? There are no guarantees in this world - ever - but there you go.


You just don't.

Vale!

Cato



--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Terry Boyle" <twboyle@...> wrote:
>
> Salve Cato,
>
> I have to say that you have chutzpah. I don't know if I've ever seen anyone endorse themselves before. Comparing resumes, your candidate is the less qualified one. I also have a problem with your candidate abruptly quitting the Senate. What type of guarantee do we have that your candidate will not jump ship once things get too hot in the kitchen next time?
>
> Vale,
>
> QID
>
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Gaius Equitius Cato
> To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2009 9:25 PM
> Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: A dream come true
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66125 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2009-05-26
Subject: Re: Sulla's Teaching Skills
Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: Sulla's Teaching Skills

  
A. Tullia Scholastica M. Octavio Graccho quiritibus, sociis, peregrinisque bonae voluntatis S.P.D.
  


> Would you please list my title correctly.  I am not JUST an accountant.
> I am the Comptroller of the construction company.  The title on my business
> card says Comptroller. :)

    ATS:  For Livia, et al., who are not native English speakers:  comptroller is indeed a different word from controller, though both might contain trolls.  

Impressive... but *I* am a *Wizard*.

In dimly lit rooms, I craft incantations in mysterious and unspeakable
languages, filled with arcane symbols that make mere mortals tremble.
awk! sed! perl! php!

    ATS:  Knit one, perl two?  Sed is Latin for but...parrots might say awk...  ;-)

I bind daemons and issue orders to them, so that they do my bidding, even
as I sleep.  These daemons, though physically confined to small metal boxes,
make their influence felt worldwide.  When a daemon misbehaves, I slay it
without pity,

    ATS:  Or at the very least, in the darkness bind them.  


and summon another servitor that will better implement my
Will.

    ATS:  More seriously:  Sometime when you get a chance, Octavi, would you please enlighten us as to just what a daemon is, and how these diabolical entities differ from servers.  Can many daemones inhabit a single server?  Why do they hate our e-mail so much that they keep spitting it back at us?  Why are they so dumb that they can’t figure out what we meant instead of what we wrote?  ;-))  Inquiring minds want to know...even those which can answer some of these queries.  

   

For mine is the power of the Source.

    ATS: And mine is of the Source Language...without which many would never have been, and English would have been more like Frisian.  

O.

--
Matt Hucke (hucke@... <mailto:hucke%40cynico.net> ), programmer.
author, Graveyards of Illinois - http://graveyards.com/
CYNICO.NET - hosting from $8.33/month; domains $13 - http://cynico.net/

    Vale, et valete.  
  
    

     
   Messages in this topic           <http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma/message/65737
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66126 From: Maior Date: 2009-05-26
Subject: Re: A dream come true
Salve Cato;
I think the issue is you and Caesar and Sulla should just enroll in Law School night school and get the training. You all love to play lawyer, but %90 of the time you're wrong. And create unecessary angst.

Sulla's going to the Maine Attorney General is not 'realistic or logical' he wanted Nova Roma to be disbanded. If you really knew the law Cato you'd know that Directors of a Corporation have a duty to the corporation, and behavior like Sulla's and yours is actionable.

That's the real law; just ask Iuniua Equestria Laeca our Chief Fincancial Officer.


See, and I don't really want to go on. Let's talk about poetry, Roman food, cultus deorum, archeology, Latin, Roman life was rich and diverse.
optime vale
Marca Hortensia Maior



is that Sulla, whether you like it or not, took the existence of our position under the law - all of the law - to a realistic, logical, if unfortunate conclusion; while we *have* the law we are bound by it, in its entirety, not just the happy feel-like-a-Roman parts.
>
> So do we want the law? If we don't what do we replace it with? If we do, how far do we want it to go?
>
> Vale!
>
> Cato
>
>
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Maior" <rory12001@> wrote:
> >
> > Salve Cato:
> > I'm not disgusted by the law, I find Roman law interesting, but when it occupies the main part of Nova Roman life, then something is seriously out of proportion.
> >
> > As for Modianus, when he removed Sulla from the Senate, he didn't have the power and it was wrong. But it was Sulla who served attorney's papers to the Senate threatening us with a lawsuit.
> >
> > Any other NR citizen would have demanded to get back via the praetors or the consuls. That's the way it should be - internal.
> >
> > bene vale
> > M. Hortensia Maior
> > here is an article Agricola and I started on Roman Law over at the NRwiki, I suggest the law lovers work on that rather than ML strife.
> > http://www.novaroma.org/nr/Roman_laws
> > >
> > > Cato Fabio Modiano sal.
> > >
> > > Salve!
> > >
> > > Step back for just a moment and read very carefully what I wrote.
> > >
> > > I am asking our citizens to imagine a clean slate - a tabula rasa, if you will - and going from there.
> > >
> > > You need to chill out a little.
> > >
> > > Don't forget that your rash action - as censor last term, which you knew was illegal and which was overturned by the Senate - was the primary reason for that whole chain of events.
> > >
> > > Vale!
> > >
> > > Cato
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, David Kling <tau.athanasios@> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > "Forget, for a moment, our incorporation as a legal entity in the United
> > > > States."
> > > >
> > > > How can we forget when we have citizens, like yourself, who call the
> > > > attorney general's office? Issue complaints, and cause all sorts of mayhem
> > > > while spouting accusations and calling for new elections of our consules!
> > > >
> > > > You cannot have it both ways.
> > > >
> > > > Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 8:54 PM, Gaius Equitius Cato <mlcinnyc@>wrote:
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Cato Liviae Plautae omnibusque in foro SPD
> > > > >
> > > > > Salvete!
> > > > >
> > > > > Livia Plauta's off-the-cuff remark struck me, and I began to think. "Hah!
> > > > > Something new and different!" I hear some of you thinking. But Livia Plauta
> > > > > says something that has faint echoes in several citizens' words.
> > > > >
> > > > > Now I ask myself - and all of you, my fellow citizens - a couple of
> > > > > questions: should we, in fact, care about the law? Should it take up any of
> > > > > our time? Does it enhance or detract from a vision we may have of a restored
> > > > > Respublica? Is it possible to have a restoration of the Respublica *without*
> > > > > the law? Is it possible to be *Roman* without law?
> > > > >
> > > > > Forget, for a moment, our incorporation as a legal entity in the United
> > > > > States. Imagine that we have no legal responsibilities to anyone other than
> > > > > ourselves - and only if we choose to have them. Forget, as we brushed on a
> > > > > while ago, any ideas of government based on post-Enlightenment political
> > > > > thought to the greatest extent possible. How would we function?
> > > > >
> > > > > Cicero defined a respublica as a community which shared a common interest
> > > > > and a common law. What would we be left with if we were, in our Respublica,
> > > > > connected only by a common interest? No law, and no government (because
> > > > > government by its very definition requires the application of authority
> > > > > based on law). Would a common interest serve to act as the foundation of a
> > > > > Respublica, or would it create simply another online interest group that
> > > > > inspires a few people to meet up every now and then? Would we be any more
> > > > > than a delayed-action chat room?
> > > > >
> > > > > (By the way, I think the Floralia gathering was an extraordinary event and
> > > > > applaud all of you who took part)
> > > > >
> > > > > So while some express their severe disgust for the law, and others are
> > > > > merely irritated by it, without it what do we have - and do we really want
> > > > > what would be left without it?
> > > > >
> > > > > Valete!
> > > > >
> > > > > Cato
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66127 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2009-05-26
Subject: Re: A dream come true
Cato Maiori sal.

Salve.

And this kind of answer is *precisely* why so few discussions here go anywhere; the attitude dripping with condescension - even though you are absolutely incorrect in each and every single legal particular.

Every. single. one. Just so you know, I had a long, live discussion tonight about this whole exact range of questions with a New York State Court judge *and* an actual, practicing corporate lawyer.

So you aren't really a useful part of the discussion any longer, and since you've stated that you don't want to be that works out well.

Maybe the citizens who want to give serious thought to my questions might do so, and we can create a useful discussion. The issue I raise has plagued Nova Roma for years and not a single useful resolution has been brought about. Rather than just go blithely along, repeating the same errors over and over again, we might want to actually put some creative thought into this.

Vale,

Cato
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66128 From: Terry Boyle Date: 2009-05-26
Subject: Re: A dream come true
     Salve Cato,
 
        I see two concerns with your response.  The first being that we cannot get any level of guarantee that you won't abruptly quit if elected censor when the pressure gets too be to much.  The second is, I feel you abused your power as a senator by calling for the removal of the consuls without cause on the ML and bellyaching about laws being broken.  The general populace believes a Senator has inside knowledge.  This was a blatant abuse of power for political reasons.  If it wasn't than you wouldn't have suddenly dropped the charges.
 
     Vale,
 
        QID
 
 
 
 
 
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2009 10:48 PM
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: A dream come true

Cato QID sal.

Salve!

Of course you've seen candidates endorse themselves! Whenever they declare a candidacy for something they are saying, "I have what it takes to get this job done - and more!"

Perhaps I have more to learn, technical-minded, than the other gentleman.

But there is a huge, vast, yawning chasm of a difference between learning technical stuff and a commitment to doing what is best regardless of who may have (or may not have) a particular interest in the outcome.

As for resigning - yep, I did it! And yep, it was a mistake. How can we guarantee that the other candidate won't abuse his power in office again if he's elected? There are no guarantees in this world - ever - but there you go.

You just don't.

Vale!

Cato

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com, "Terry Boyle" <twboyle@... > wrote:
>
> Salve Cato,
>
> I have to say that you have chutzpah. I don't know if I've ever seen anyone endorse themselves before. Comparing resumes, your candidate is the less qualified one. I also have a problem with your candidate abruptly quitting the Senate. What type of guarantee do we have that your candidate will not jump ship once things get too hot in the kitchen next time?
>
> Vale,
>
> QID
>
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Gaius Equitius Cato
> To: Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com
> Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2009 9:25 PM
> Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: A dream come true
>

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66129 From: C. Maria Caeca Date: 2009-05-26
Subject: A modest suggestion
You know, I don't mind cogent, logical posts on law or anything else. If I
understand them, that's great. If I don't, I ask. Rome was a city built on
law, and if we are going to reconstruct it, I don't see how we can ignore
that. Since we are incorporated in a State (Maine) of the United States, we
are bound by certain Maine laws which are applicable, and w should
understand them, as responsible citizens. Since Maine is in the United
States, we are bound by applicable United States laws, and, as responsible
citizens, we should understand them, also.

However, I woule rather see this list contain discussions of law *and*
discussions of other cultural aspects of NR and Roma Antiqua. Let's not
*stop* discussion, let's add more!

And yes ... I do know the literary illustion in the title of my post, and it
was said tongue in cheek.

C. Maria Caeca, who thinks our virtual forum can be as big and as busy as
*we* make it.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66130 From: Lucius Cornelius Cicero Date: 2009-05-26
Subject: Re: Roman political campaigning
Which is exactly why faux outrage and feigned indignation are so stupid in a group who claims to be a continuation of Rome.

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, QFabiusMaxmi@... wrote:
>
>
> In a message dated 5/26/2009 6:49:35 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
> Cicero@... writes:
>
> Feigned indignation and faux outrage to try and whip up political support?
>
>
>
> But of course. We are Roman after all. It is one feeble effort.
>
> Our political campaigns are laughable when compared to the slander,
> bribery, threats, supporter riots of the Republican Romans. They'd probably be
> ashamed of us.
>
> Q. Fabius Maximus
> **************A Good Credit Score is 700 or Above. See yours in just 2 easy
> steps!
> (http://pr.atwola.com/promoclk/100126575x1222377034x1201454326/aol?redir=http://www.freecreditreport.com/pm/default.aspx?sc=668072&hmpgID=62&bcd=
> MaystepsfooterNO62)
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66131 From: Timothy or Stephen Gallagher Date: 2009-05-26
Subject: Re: A dream come true
Salve Quintus Iunius Dominicus
 
I can assure you that if Cato wins the election and even thinks of resigning someone will find him with my fingerprints around his neck.  : )
 
Vale
 
Paulinus

 

To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
From: twboyle@...
Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 23:29:54 -0400
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: A dream come true



     Salve Cato,
 
        I see two concerns with your response.  The first being that we cannot get any level of guarantee that you won't abruptly quit if elected censor when the pressure gets too be to much.  The second is, I feel you abused your power as a senator by calling for the removal of the consuls without cause on the ML and bellyaching about laws being broken.  The general populace believes a Senator has inside knowledge.  This was a blatant abuse of power for political reasons.  If it wasn't than you wouldn't have suddenly dropped the charges.
 
     Vale,
 
        QID
 
 
 
 
 
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2009 10:48 PM
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: A dream come true

Cato QID sal.

Salve!

Of course you've seen candidates endorse themselves! Whenever they declare a candidacy for something they are saying, "I have what it takes to get this job done - and more!"

Perhaps I have more to learn, technical-minded, than the other gentleman.

But there is a huge, vast, yawning chasm of a difference between learning technical stuff and a commitment to doing what is best regardless of who may have (or may not have) a particular interest in the outcome.

As for resigning - yep, I did it! And yep, it was a mistake. How can we guarantee that the other candidate won't abuse his power in office again if he's elected? There are no guarantees in this world - ever - but there you go.

You just don't.

Vale!

Cato

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com, "Terry Boyle" <twboyle@... > wrote:
>
> Salve Cato,
>
> I have to say that you have chutzpah. I don't know if I've ever seen anyone endorse themselves before. Comparing resumes, your candidate is the less qualified one. I also have a problem with your candidate abruptly quitting the Senate. What type of guarantee do we have that your candidate will not jump ship once things get too hot in the kitchen next time?
>
> Vale,
>
> QID
>
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Gaius Equitius Cato
> To: Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com
> Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2009 9:25 PM
> Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: A dream come true
>



Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66132 From: Terry Boyle Date: 2009-05-26
Subject: Re: A dream come true
    Salve Paulinus
 
       That's a good guarantee!  :)   
 
 
       Vale,
 
            QID
 
   p.s.  Equestria mentioned your woodworking project.  I'm looking into it for you.
 
 
 
 
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2009 11:45 PM
Subject: RE: [Nova-Roma] Re: A dream come true

Salve Quintus Iunius Dominicus
 
I can assure you that if Cato wins the election and even thinks of resigning someone will find him with my fingerprints around his neck.  : )
 
Vale
 
Paulinus

 


To: Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com
From: twboyle@gmail. com
Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 23:29:54 -0400
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: A dream come true



     Salve Cato,
 
        I see two concerns with your response.  The first being that we cannot get any level of guarantee that you won't abruptly quit if elected censor when the pressure gets too be to much.  The second is, I feel you abused your power as a senator by calling for the removal of the consuls without cause on the ML and bellyaching about laws being broken.  The general populace believes a Senator has inside knowledge.  This was a blatant abuse of power for political reasons.  If it wasn't than you wouldn't have suddenly dropped the charges.
 
     Vale,
 
        QID
 
 
 
 
 
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2009 10:48 PM
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: A dream come true

Cato QID sal.

Salve!

Of course you've seen candidates endorse themselves! Whenever they declare a candidacy for something they are saying, "I have what it takes to get this job done - and more!"

Perhaps I have more to learn, technical-minded, than the other gentleman.

But there is a huge, vast, yawning chasm of a difference between learning technical stuff and a commitment to doing what is best regardless of who may have (or may not have) a particular interest in the outcome.

As for resigning - yep, I did it! And yep, it was a mistake. How can we guarantee that the other candidate won't abuse his power in office again if he's elected? There are no guarantees in this world - ever - but there you go.

You just don't.

Vale!

Cato

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com, "Terry Boyle" <twboyle@... > wrote:
>
> Salve Cato,
>
> I have to say that you have chutzpah. I don't know if I've ever seen anyone endorse themselves before. Comparing resumes, your candidate is the less qualified one. I also have a problem with your candidate abruptly quitting the Senate. What type of guarantee do we have that your candidate will not jump ship once things get too hot in the kitchen next time?
>
> Vale,
>
> QID
>
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Gaius Equitius Cato
> To: Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com
> Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2009 9:25 PM
> Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: A dream come true
>



Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66133 From: Gnaeus Iulius Caesar Date: 2009-05-27
Subject: Re: A dream come true
Caesar Maori SPD
 
Apart from your JD when was the last time you wrote or interpreted a court order, or crafted legislation in the real world? Given the quality and shallow depth of knowledge of many lawyers I deal with I would rather saw my leg off and eat it than join that bloated and largely unimpressive profession.
 
 
From: Maior
Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2009 9:07 PM
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: A dream come true

Salve Cato;
  I think the issue is you and Caesar and Sulla should just enroll in Law School night school and get the training. You all love to play lawyer, but %90 of the time you're wrong. And create unecessary angst.

Sulla's going to the Maine Attorney General is not 'realistic or logical' he wanted Nova Roma to be disbanded. If you really knew the law Cato you'd know that Directors of a Corporation have a duty to the corporation, and behavior like Sulla's and yours is actionable.
 
That's the real law; just ask Iuniua Equestria Laeca our Chief Fincancial Officer.
 

See, and I don't really want to go on. Let's talk about poetry, Roman food, cultus deorum,  archeology, Latin, Roman life was rich and diverse.
                         optime vale
                       Marca Hortensia Maior

 

 is that Sulla, whether you like it or not, took the existence of our position under the law - all of the law - to a realistic, logical, if unfortunate conclusion; while we *have* the law we are bound by it, in its entirety, not just the happy feel-like-a-Roman parts.
>
> So do we want the law?  If we don't what do we
replace it with?  If we do, how far do we want it to go?
>
>
Vale!
>
> Cato
>
>
>
> --- In
href="mailto:Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com">Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Maior" <rory12001@> wrote:
> >
> > Salve Cato:
> >  I'm not disgusted by the law, I find Roman law interesting, but when
it occupies the main part of Nova Roman life, then something is seriously out of proportion.
> >
> > As for Modianus, when he removed Sulla
from the Senate, he didn't have the power and it was wrong. But it was Sulla who served attorney's papers to the Senate threatening us with a lawsuit.
> >
> > Any other NR citizen would have demanded to get back via the
praetors or the consuls. That's the way it should be - internal.
> >
> >                         
bene vale
> >                         
M. Hortensia Maior
> > here is an article Agricola and I started on
Roman Law over at the NRwiki, I suggest the law lovers work on that rather than ML strife.
> >
href="http://www.novaroma.org/nr/Roman_laws">http://www.novaroma.org/nr/Roman_laws
> > >
> > > Cato Fabio Modiano sal.
> > >
> > > Salve!
> > >
> > > Step back for just a
moment and read very carefully what I wrote. 
> > >
> > > I am asking our citizens to imagine a clean slate - a tabula rasa, if
you will - and going from there.
> > >
> > > You need
to chill out a little. 
> > >
> > > Don't forget
that your rash action - as censor last term, which you knew was illegal and which was overturned by the Senate - was the primary reason for that whole chain of events.
> > >
> > > Vale!
> > >
> > > Cato
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --- In
href="mailto:Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com">Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, David Kling <tau.athanasios@> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > "Forget, for a moment, our incorporation as a legal entity in the
United
> > > > States."
> > > >
> > > > How can we forget when we have citizens, like yourself, who call
the
> > > > attorney general's office?  Issue complaints,
and cause all sorts of mayhem
> > > > while spouting accusations
and calling for new elections of our consules!
> > > >
> > > > You cannot have it both ways.
> > > >
> > > > Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 8:54 PM, Gaius Equitius Cato <
href="mailto:mlcinnyc@>wrote">mlcinnyc@>wrote:
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Cato Liviae Plautae omnibusque in foro SPD
> > > > >
> > > > > Salvete!
> > > > >
> > > > > Livia Plauta's off-the-cuff remark struck me, and I began to
think. "Hah!
> > > > > Something new and different!" I hear
some of you thinking. But Livia Plauta
> > > > > says
something that has faint echoes in several citizens' words.
> > > > >
> > > > > Now I ask myself - and all of you, my
fellow citizens - a couple of
> > > > > questions: should we,
in fact, care about the law? Should it take up any of
> > > > > our time? Does it enhance or detract from a vision we may have of a
restored
> > > > > Respublica? Is it possible to have a
restoration of the Respublica *without*
> > > > > the law? Is
it possible to be *Roman* without law?
> > > > >
> > > > > Forget, for a moment, our incorporation as a legal entity in the
United
> > > > > States. Imagine that we have no legal
responsibilities to anyone other than
> > > > > ourselves -
and only if we choose to have them. Forget, as we brushed on a
> > > > > while ago, any ideas of government based on post-Enlightenment
political
> > > > > thought to the greatest extent possible.
How would we function?
> > > > >
> > > > >
Cicero defined a respublica as a community which shared a common interest
> > > > > and a common law. What would we be left
with if we were, in our Respublica,
> > > > > connected only
by a common interest? No law, and no government (because
> > > > > government by its very definition requires the application of
authority
> > > > > based on law). Would a common interest
serve to act as the foundation of a
> > > > > Respublica, or
would it create simply another online interest group that
> > > > > inspires a few people to meet up every now and then? Would we be any
more
> > > > > than a delayed-action chat room?
> > > > >
> > > > > (By the way, I think the Floralia
gathering was an extraordinary event and
> > > > > applaud all
of you who took part)
> > > > >
> > > > > So
while some express their severe disgust for the law, and others are
> > > > > merely irritated by it, without it what do we have - and do we
really want
> > > > > what would be left without it?
> > > > >
> > > > > Valete!
> > > > >
> > > > > Cato
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>




------------------------------------

Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo..com/group/Nova-Roma/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    mailto:Nova-Roma-digest@yahoogroups.com
    mailto:Nova-Roma-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66134 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2009-05-27
Subject: Re: A dream come true
Cato QID sal.

Salve!

The key words here are "without cause".

There was - and is - quite a large body of evidence that the consuls and others have abused their power, and broken the law to a serious extent on several occasions. Those still remain. However, the decision I made was to stop all action involving any outside party, as I realized that if I am going to continually argue the use of Nova Roman law in the manner in which it is intended, then I should act accordingly.

When the time comes, Nova Roman law can be called upon to serve its purpose.

If you think that following a path that has obviously led some here to detest me was useful for "political purposes", you must have a very different idea of what is useful politically than is generally accepted. A senator has very little actual political "power", so in real terms there is nothing that infers "blatant abuse" about a citizen attempting to bring to account those who they feel are violating our law.

I can give you my solemn word here that I will serve out the term of censor faithfully and fully. That is the word of a Roman. I don't think that will suddenly make you want to vote for me, but that's what I can give.

Vale!

Cato
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66135 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2009-05-27
Subject: Re: A modest suggestion
Cato Mariae Caecae sal.

Salve!

Well said. One of the main objectives (as I see it) for incorporation was to give the religio Romana some sort of "official" place to call home. A serious question to consider is whether or not that has actually happened to any degree.

Another may be our ability to act as a supporter of things like a scholarship fund, or projects in the outside world that will give some strength to our goals of restoration and reconstruction.

But if incorporation brings along with it the heavy weight of a legal burden that we have found obstructive and unhelpful, perhaps we should consider either un-incorporating *or* molding our incorporation to fit our particular needs better.

Is either one a desirable or useful direction to take? Is either one possible? This goes to the heart of our existence, as either self-determining or subject to outside directive.

I do think that a very important first step is the ideas I have suggested for a while and have put out in the Consular Committee on Law:

1. The leges Salicia poenalis and iudiciaria are repealed
2. The lex Equitia de iurisdiction is repealed
3. The lex Arminia Equitia de imperio is repealed
4. The lex Minucia eiuratione magistratum is repealed

And revamp the entire legal "system" we have, and make it more in line with ancient practice.

Vale!

Cato



--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "C. Maria Caeca" <shoshanahathaway@...> wrote:
>
> You know, I don't mind cogent, logical posts on law or anything else. If I
> understand them, that's great. If I don't, I ask. Rome was a city built on
> law, and if we are going to reconstruct it, I don't see how we can ignore
> that. Since we are incorporated in a State (Maine) of the United States, we
> are bound by certain Maine laws which are applicable, and w should
> understand them, as responsible citizens. Since Maine is in the United
> States, we are bound by applicable United States laws, and, as responsible
> citizens, we should understand them, also.
>
> However, I woule rather see this list contain discussions of law *and*
> discussions of other cultural aspects of NR and Roma Antiqua. Let's not
> *stop* discussion, let's add more!
>
> And yes ... I do know the literary illustion in the title of my post, and it
> was said tongue in cheek.
>
> C. Maria Caeca, who thinks our virtual forum can be as big and as busy as
> *we* make it.
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66136 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2009-05-27
Subject: Re: Remembering The Fallen!
Re: [Nova-Roma] Remembering The Fallen!

  
A. Tullia Scholastica Ap. Galerio Aureliano quiritibus, sociis, peregrinisque bonae voluntatis S.P.D.
  


Salve,

This message is to extend the rememberance of the fallen military here and in Sarmatia (Russia) on this memorial day.Sorry if I have offended anyone.Thank you.

    ATS: The problem is that Yahoo, or my mail system, turned this into gibberish composed of vowels with assorted diacritics, not that it was offensive...in any case, I doubt that most of us know Russian, if that’s what it is.  

Ap.Galerius Aurelianus

Vale, et valete.  

  
    
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66137 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2009-05-27
Subject: Re: A vote for NR is a vote for Cato
No rebuttal eh? :)

Thought so!

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@... wrote:
>
> Sulla,
>
> SUE AND BE DAMNED.? NR is not going to back down from your threats anymore.
>
> Fl. Galerius Aurelianus
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Robert Woolwine <l_cornelius_sulla@...>
> To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Tue, 26 May 2009 8:56 am
> Subject: [Nova-Roma] A vote for NR is a vote for Cato
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Let's also keep in mind. Cato will not peruse personal vendettas. Whereas Modianus has ALWAYS done that (Cincinnatus, Cassius, Me). It's just when he comes to try to deal with me. I will fight back. With Modianus as Censor he will take NR into a lawsuit. NR will lose. Modianus will become homeless. Because I will go after him and every single board member who allowed Modianus to break the law and peruse his vendetta. So, unless the board members are willing to put up their own personal funds. Modianus will be the cause of the one thing that can potentially end the organization- a lawsuit.
>
> Vale,
>
> Sulla
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Q. Valerius Poplicola" <q.valerius.poplicola@> wrote:
> >
> > Cato has not done anything to jeopardize our organization; Modianus broke both Nova Roma and US law. Cato has as a Christian promoted the Religio Romana, Modianus only knows how to bash Christianity. Cato has promoted many ideas about law reform to better our organization; Modianus took a break because life was too hectic for him at the time, and now only is running to spite Cato.
> >
> > Regardless of whether Modianus' candidacy is legal or illegal, he's clearly the inferior candidate.
> >
> > GO CATO!
> >
> > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Maior" <rory12001@> wrote:
> > >
> > > Salvete;
> > > he's been censor and he conducted himself with impartiality and dignitas.
> > > now please let's not have a hate-Modianus/Cato exercise. Talk about positive aspects of your candidate.
> > > Marca Hortensia Maior
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Today you wrote, "Nova Roma is about people. Bringing people together who
> > > > have a common love of Rome and her history and culture. The mud slinging
> > > > and the fighting is only ancilliary to what it is all really about!"
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > I hope you remember these words if you are elected Censor.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Vale,
> > > >
> > > > Potitus
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > _____
> > > >
> > > > From: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com [mailto:Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf
> > > > Of David Kling
> > > > Sent: Monday, May 25, 2009 7:41 PM
> > > > To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> > > > Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Sulla's rebuttal - Re: Nova-Roma is life
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus C. Petronio salutem dicit
> > > >
> > > > Exactly. Nova Roma is NOT simply an on-line thing. Several years ago I
> > > > attended a provincial event that included an oratory competition between
> > > > Marcus Octavius Gracchus and Marcus Bianchius Antonius at a park in
> > > > Columbus, Ohio. I now live in Columbus (just north actually) and was at a
> > > > local park with my girlfriend. I looked over and said, "Oh. That was the
> > > > site of an oratory competition and provincial event in Nova Roma." I stood
> > > > there and thought about that occassion pleasantly. It is memories like that
> > > > one, and others, that have captivated me -- and drawn me closer to the dream
> > > > of Nova Roma.
> > > >
> > > > Nova Roma is about people. Bringing people together who have a common love
> > > > of Rome and her history and culture. The mud slinging and the fighting is
> > > > only ancilliary to what it is all really about!
> > > >
> > > > I'm pleased you had a good time at the Floralia, and I commend Lentulus for
> > > > organizing such a wonderful event. It is my hope to eventually come to
> > > > Europe and connect with Nova Romans there!
> > > >
> > > > Vale;
> > > >
> > > > Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66138 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2009-05-27
Subject: Re: A dream come true
So you have a choice to make - 1 a lawbreaker. 2 someone you think might quite. Interesting choice.

I think its easy - Cato for censor.

Vale,

Sulla


--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Terry Boyle" <twboyle@...> wrote:
>
> Salve Cato,
>
> I see two concerns with your response. The first being that we cannot get any level of guarantee that you won't abruptly quit if elected censor when the pressure gets too be to much. The second is, I feel you abused your power as a senator by calling for the removal of the consuls without cause on the ML and bellyaching about laws being broken. The general populace believes a Senator has inside knowledge. This was a blatant abuse of power for political reasons. If it wasn't than you wouldn't have suddenly dropped the charges.
>
> Vale,
>
> QID
>
>
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Gaius Equitius Cato
> To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2009 10:48 PM
> Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: A dream come true
>
>
>
>
>
> Cato QID sal.
>
> Salve!
>
> Of course you've seen candidates endorse themselves! Whenever they declare a candidacy for something they are saying, "I have what it takes to get this job done - and more!"
>
> Perhaps I have more to learn, technical-minded, than the other gentleman.
>
> But there is a huge, vast, yawning chasm of a difference between learning technical stuff and a commitment to doing what is best regardless of who may have (or may not have) a particular interest in the outcome.
>
> As for resigning - yep, I did it! And yep, it was a mistake. How can we guarantee that the other candidate won't abuse his power in office again if he's elected? There are no guarantees in this world - ever - but there you go.
>
> You just don't.
>
> Vale!
>
> Cato
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Terry Boyle" <twboyle@> wrote:
> >
> > Salve Cato,
> >
> > I have to say that you have chutzpah. I don't know if I've ever seen anyone endorse themselves before. Comparing resumes, your candidate is the less qualified one. I also have a problem with your candidate abruptly quitting the Senate. What type of guarantee do we have that your candidate will not jump ship once things get too hot in the kitchen next time?
> >
> > Vale,
> >
> > QID
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: Gaius Equitius Cato
> > To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> > Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2009 9:25 PM
> > Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: A dream come true
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66139 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2009-05-27
Subject: Re: our untapped resource
Of course I am a zionist!

Do you think I care a second what the UN thinks? Ever heard of Druban II? The UN is run by petty thugs. Look who has headed the UN council of human rights:

Egypt
China
Indonesia
Pakistan
Saudia Arabia - where women cannot drive at all.
Russia - Hey forget about their invasion of Georgia
Cuba

And, if that isn't enough:
http://littlegreenfootballs.com/article/30372_The_UNs_9-11_Truther
http://littlegreenfootballs.com/article/30287_UNICEF_Partners_with_Terrorist_Group
http://littlegreenfootballs.com/article/29559_UN_Hits_Bottom_Digs
http://littlegreenfootballs.com/article/26965_UN_Human_Rights_Head_Joins_Thugfest_in_Tehran

And no the war in 1948 has never really ended. Remember there was this little thing that happened right after my vacation there in a place called Gaza. Oh yeah...they kept bombing Sederot - where my friends attend college in Saphir college.

Citing the UN as a source in ANYTHING is not going to score points wit me.

Vale,

Sulla

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Titus Flavius Aquila <titus.aquila@...> wrote:
>
> If you call somebody a Nazi, you have to be careful that nobody calls you a Zionist.
> According to an UN resolution , Zionism is racism.
> So you better be careful what you say and refrain from obviously insulting terms.
> It seems you are still fighting the old war from the 40s, are you ? Get over it.
>
> Vale
> Titus Flavius Aquila
>
>
> ________________________________
> Von: Robert Woolwine <l_cornelius_sulla@...>
> An: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> Gesendet: Dienstag, den 26. Mai 2009, 15:50:58 Uhr
> Betreff: [Nova-Roma] Re: our untapped resource
>
>
>
>
>
> Don't bring me into the conversation, you nazi. I have nothing to do with it.
>
> Go back and post on stormfront, your 800+ posts there obviously skewed your brain.
>
> Vale,
>
> Sulla
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com, "lathyrus77" <lathyrus77@ ...> wrote:
> >
> > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com, "Q. Valerius Poplicola" <q.valerius. poplicola@ > wrote:
> > Anna has the sole distinction of being moderated on account of her trolling, and furthermore because she's not a civis there's much less tolerance for her.
> > >
> >
> >
> > I wasn't moderated for trolling. Metellus apologized for muting me and said he had been rash. Funny how I'm not called an idiot or troll or retarded by anyone else but you and sulla.
> >
> > -Anna
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66140 From: MCC Date: 2009-05-27
Subject: COMITIA CENTURIATA: Election for Censor
Salvete

Memento:

- from today 27 to 29 May only are allowed to vote the members of the First Class centuries (Centuries I to XV)
-from 30 May to 3 June are allowed to vote the members of all centuries.

Please check your own centuria in your profile in the Album Civium (http://www.novaroma.org/civitas/album)

Valete

M. Curiatius Complutensis
Consul

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66141 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2009-05-27
Subject: Re: Latin achievement
Re: [Nova-Roma] Latin achievement

  
A. Tullia Scholastica Maximae Valeriae Messallinae quiritibus, sociis, peregrinisque bonae voluntatis S.P.D.

  

Congratulations to all the students in Latina I for their perseverance and hard work.

    ATS:  Thank you on behalf of the students.  They deserve a great deal of praise for both perseverance and hard work, especially in a year beset by severe and unanticipated technical problems.  All of them have in fact passed the course; the marks have been posted, and all are raring to move to their more upscale digs for the intermediate course, but must wait for the intermediate class to face and surpass their final examination.  

Vale bene in pace Deorum,

Maxima Valeria Messallina

Vale bene in pace deorum,

A. Tullia Scholastica



--- On Fri, 5/22/09, A. Tullia Scholastica <fororom@...> wrote:

From: A. Tullia Scholastica <fororom@...>
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Latin achievement
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Date: Friday, May 22, 2009, 1:29 AM

A. Tullia Scholastica quiritibus, sociis, peregrinisque bonae voluntatis S.P.D.

    I am pleased to report that all students in Grammatica Latina I have passed their final examination, and will also pass the course, though I have not yet computed the course grades.  They have persevered through a very difficult course and endured the death of the original course server along with the jury-rigged methods we have had to use to conduct our courses, and deserve congratulations for that alone.  

    In this course they have learned all five of the Latin noun declensions, the adjective and pronoun declensions, and the indicative mood of the verb in both the active and passive voices.  They have learned a good bit of vocabulary, and even touched upon idioms and modern vocabulary not included in their text.  They have learned to read simple Latin sentences and even entire paragraphs, and to translate sentences from English into Latin...a greater feat for some as they are not native English speakers.  

    The intermediate Grammatica students have finished their last assignment, and are awaiting their final examination, while the Sermo II students are working on theirs (Hor-ten-si- a, you are working on the exam, now aren’t you?), and the Sermo I class is on its final assignment before facing the ultimate music.  The Grammatica II students have learnt the supposed terrors of the Latin subjunctive and many other joys of syntax, and in early March passed from that to the reading of actual Latin texts from Roman authors:  Caesar, Cicero, and Horace, to name a few, and have been treated to Latin idioms and Latin metrics, neither of which is addressed by their text, while the Sermo students have been learning to read, write, and speak Latin.  If you are interested in doing the same, please let me know.  We expect to offer both intermediate courses and the combined Sermo course next year, though likely only one of the other two introductory courses will run unless we can locate another instructor.   

Vale, et valete.  

 


 
  
    

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66142 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2009-05-27
Subject: Re: Pericles Funeral Oration
Re: [Nova-Roma] Pericles Funeral Oration

  

  A. Tullia Scholastica P. Ullerio Venatori Ti. Galerio Paulino quiritibus, sociis, peregrinisque bonae voluntatis S.P.D.

Ave Paulinus;

On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 1:57 PM, Timothy or Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>
> Salvete
>
> I thought this would be appropriate for this weekend
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2UJLXKlkvlM
>
> Valete
>
> Tiberius Galerius Paulinus
>

Thank you for showing this to me, and reminding me of my early
admiration of Pericles.

Here is the full text, in English translation:
http://www.wsu.edu/~dee/GREECE/PERICLES.HTM


    ATS:  Thanks to both of you for posting these.  I share your admiration for Perikles, and the culture of his time.  For those who don’t know Greek, I should mention that Thucydides [properly, Thoukydides] is often regarded as the most difficult Greek author, as Tacitus is the most difficult classical Latin one, so one might be wise to check more than one translation.

Benedicte – Venator

Te  (et vos) benedico.  

Vale, et valete.  
  
    
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66143 From: M. Lucretius Agricola Date: 2009-05-27
Subject: Re: Voting procedures reminder
Agricola Omnibus S.P.D.

The election in the centuriate assembly has entered the second phase. All citizens who are in "first class" centuries, that is, centuries 1 through 14 inclusive, may now vote.

The diribitores are comparing their tallies and shall soon report the results of phase 1.

valete



--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "M. Lucretius Agricola" <marcus.lucretius@...> wrote:
>
> Agricola Omnibus S.P.D.
>
> As I write I see just over 3 hours remaining in the first phase of our election.
>
> In the first phase, only the "centuria praerogativa" is allowed to vote. This time it is century 14.
>
> Some citizens from other centuries have cast ballots as well, but the Lex Fabia de ratione comitiorum centuriatorum prohibits those from being counted. Those citizens WILL be able to vote again, in either phase 2 or phase 3 of the process, as outlined below.
>
> Citizens may check their currently assigned century by looking in the Album Civium http://www.novaroma.org/civitas/album Please note that the century assignments were changed just before the election, so citizens are advised to re-check their centuries.
>
> All magistrates extend their thanks to all who have voted thus far, but we would ask that those who have voted outside of the proper time to re-vote at the correct time.
>
> Thus far ballots 7003, 7004, 7005, 7006, 7008, 7009, 7010 have been reported by the diribitores as cast at the wrong time.
>
> Note that anyone in century 14 who has not yet voted may vote at any time before the final closing of the cista at the end of phase 3.
>
>
> I add my personal note of thanks to all the diribitores and to my colleague, Cn. Lentulus, for their work thus far, and to all those who have thus far shown their community spirit by voting.
>
>
> Valete
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "M. Lucretius Agricola" <marcus.lucretius@> wrote:
> >
> > Agricola omnibus S.P.D.
> >
> >
> >
> > I would ask all citizen to read the following message completely.
> >
> >
> >
> > Our Lex Fabia de ratione comitiorum centuriatorum says in part:
> >
> > "A century from the first class shall be selected by lot by the diribitores to vote first. No century containing only one member shall be selected for this purpose. For the first 48 hours of the voting period only members of that century shall be permitted to vote."
> >
> > This is the "centuria praerogativa" and the diribitores selected centuria XIV, that is, century 14, for this honor.
> >
> > Since we are still within that first 48 hour period, any votes from citizens OTHER THAN centuria XIV cannot be counted.
> >
> > IF YOU HAVE VOTED ALREADY, YOUR VOTE CANNOT BE COUNTED UNLESS YOU ARE IN CENTURY 14. Anyone who voted too early will be able to re-vote later, at the correct time. Not sure if you are in this century? Check here: http://www.novaroma.org/civitas/album?cmd=show-century¢ury=14
> >
> > REMEMBER, Your century will have changed just before the election, so you must check your century in the Album Civium http://www.novaroma.org/civitas/album . You can simply search for yourself and read your century from your page.
> >
> >
> > Our website explains voting by centuries, and here I have added notes and broken this text down to show clearly the three phases of voting:
> >
> > 1. During the first forty-eight hours of voting, only [the chosen] century is permitted to vote. At the end of that time, the diribitores will announce the results of the vote as they stand from that century.
> >
> > 2. Next, the entire first class [that is, centuries 1 through 14, inclusive], becomes eligible to vote. At the end of this second forty-eight hours of voting the diribitores will announce the results of the entire first class.
> >
> > 3. Finally, all the centuries become eligible to vote, for the remainder of the voting period. At no time in this do the centuria praerogativa or the first class become ineligible to vote. They may vote from the beginning of their voting time to the end of voting.
> >
> > The schedule for these three phases is posted on the election page, here: http://www.novaroma.org/nr/Election_Maius_MMDCCLXII_(Nova_Roma)
> >
> >
> >
> > Finally, please remember to take note of your BALLOT NUMBER. Problem ballots will be announced by BALLOT NUMBER.
> >
> >
> > Thank you all for reading this and optime valete!
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66144 From: David Kling Date: 2009-05-27
Subject: Re: A dream come true
Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus Gaio Equitio Catoni salutem dicit

Now you want to discuss law.  Not long ago you were calling for consular elections, calling Attorney Generals, and perpetuating the idea that Nova Roma was out of compliance.  What has plagued Nova Roma is your agenda to create chaos, combined with Sulla's desire to get Nova Roma "disbanded."  And so you talked with a judge and an attorney.  That doesn't make you one.  Maior might not be a practicing attorney, but she did go to law school.  That gives her an edge that you do not have. 

Vale;

Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus

On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 11:26 PM, Gaius Equitius Cato <mlcinnyc@...> wrote:


Cato Maiori sal.

Salve.

And this kind of answer is *precisely* why so few discussions here go anywhere; the attitude dripping with condescension - even though you are absolutely incorrect in each and every single legal particular.

Every. single. one. Just so you know, I had a long, live discussion tonight about this whole exact range of questions with a New York State Court judge *and* an actual, practicing corporate lawyer.

So you aren't really a useful part of the discussion any longer, and since you've stated that you don't want to be that works out well.

Maybe the citizens who want to give serious thought to my questions might do so, and we can create a useful discussion. The issue I raise has plagued Nova Roma for years and not a single useful resolution has been brought about. Rather than just go blithely along, repeating the same errors over and over again, we might want to actually put some creative thought into this.

Vale,

Cato




Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66145 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2009-05-27
Subject: Re: A dream come true
Don't simplify my complaint, oh pantless one.

What NR is plagued with is with lawbreakers serving in positions that can get NR sued and those who want to repeat the same vendetta's.

Face the fact, pantless one - you came across someone who will fight back. That is the fundamental difference between your vendetta against Cincinnatus. He left. And Cassius - he would only take macronational action if NR started it first. Whereas I will do it the moment you move against me.

Vale,

Sulla

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, David Kling <tau.athanasios@...> wrote:
>
> Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus Gaio Equitio Catoni salutem dicit
>
> Now you want to discuss law. Not long ago you were calling for consular
> elections, calling Attorney Generals, and perpetuating the idea that Nova
> Roma was out of compliance. What has plagued Nova Roma is your agenda to
> create chaos, combined with Sulla's desire to get Nova Roma "disbanded."
> And so you talked with a judge and an attorney. That doesn't make you one.
> Maior might not be a practicing attorney, but she did go to law school.
> That gives her an edge that you do not have.
>
> Vale;
>
> Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus
>
> On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 11:26 PM, Gaius Equitius Cato <mlcinnyc@...>wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > Cato Maiori sal.
> >
> > Salve.
> >
> > And this kind of answer is *precisely* why so few discussions here go
> > anywhere; the attitude dripping with condescension - even though you are
> > absolutely incorrect in each and every single legal particular.
> >
> > Every. single. one. Just so you know, I had a long, live discussion tonight
> > about this whole exact range of questions with a New York State Court judge
> > *and* an actual, practicing corporate lawyer.
> >
> > So you aren't really a useful part of the discussion any longer, and since
> > you've stated that you don't want to be that works out well.
> >
> > Maybe the citizens who want to give serious thought to my questions might
> > do so, and we can create a useful discussion. The issue I raise has plagued
> > Nova Roma for years and not a single useful resolution has been brought
> > about. Rather than just go blithely along, repeating the same errors over
> > and over again, we might want to actually put some creative thought into
> > this.
> >
> > Vale,
> >
> > Cato
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66146 From: A. Sempronius Regulus Date: 2009-05-27
Subject: Re: A modest suggestion
There used to be a list devoted to the discussion of law and NR law so it would not flood the main list.

--- On Wed, 5/27/09, C. Maria Caeca <shoshanahathaway@...> wrote:

From: C. Maria Caeca <shoshanahathaway@comcast..net>
Subject: [Nova-Roma] A modest suggestion
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Date: Wednesday, May 27, 2009, 3:33 AM

You know, I don't mind cogent, logical posts on law or anything else. If I
understand them, that's great. If I don't, I ask. Rome was a city built on
law, and if we are going to reconstruct it, I don't see how we can ignore
that. Since we are incorporated in a State (Maine) of the United States, we
are bound by certain Maine laws which are applicable, and w should
understand them, as responsible citizens. Since Maine is in the United
States, we are bound by applicable United States laws, and, as responsible
citizens, we should understand them, also.

However, I woule rather see this list contain discussions of law *and*
discussions of other cultural aspects of NR and Roma Antiqua. Let's not
*stop* discussion, let's add more!

And yes ... I do know the literary illustion in the title of my post, and it
was said tongue in cheek.

C. Maria Caeca, who thinks our virtual forum can be as big and as busy as
*we* make it.


Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66147 From: QFabiusMaxmi@aol.com Date: 2009-05-27
Subject: Re: Roman political campaigning
In a message dated 5/26/2009 8:41:03 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time, Cicero@... writes:
Which is exactly why faux outrage and feigned indignation are so stupid in a group who claims to be a continuation of Rome.
 
 
<Sigh>  I know
 
Q. Fabius Maximus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66148 From: PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@aol.com Date: 2009-05-27
Subject: Re: A dream come true
Aurelianus Cato sal.

You could give your oath before your Gods and the Dii Immortales that should you resign from your office (if elected), you will also resign your citizenship or swear never to run for any magistracy in Nova Roma ever again.  An oath sworn before one's Gods is the most sacred of promises and I would expect every magistrate to be willing to swear an oath when actvely seeking a public office that only a deep or major personal crisis or some sign from the Gods would prevent them from completing their term of office.  This goes doubly for those that actively sought an office and then given the oath to fulfill that term of office.

I was elected to the office of plebeian aedile on a write-in ballot.  I did not seek the office and events in Nova Roma called me to question whether it was proper for me to take it.  I took the auspices on three occasions but they were never better than neutral and were mostly negative, so I did not take the office.  As it turned out, the auspices were right because I was chosen to serve as Senator, pontiff, and interim Pontifex Maximus that year. 

An individual who insists that they will not give their public oath then they are faithless in their pledges and motivated solely by fear, personal gain, or animosity.  A person who has sworn oaths not to harm Nova Roma and then threatens to damage or destroy it by any means to accomplish their personal goals is beneath contempt and no right thinking person should have any trust in anything that they promise or say.   

If you keep your oath, you will be honored by the the Gods and the People of Nova Roma.  If you fail to keep your oath, you will be forever dishonored within Nova Roma and before the Gods.

Vale.


-----Original Message-----
From: Gaius Equitius Cato <mlcinnyc@...>
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tue, 26 May 2009 9:48 pm
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: A dream come true



Cato QID sal.

Salve!

Of course you've seen candidates endorse themselves! Whenever they declare a candidacy for something they are saying, "I have what it takes to get this job done - and more!"

Perhaps I have more to learn, technical-minded, than the other gentleman.

But there is a huge, vast, yawning chasm of a difference between learning technical stuff and a commitment to doing what is best regardless of who may have (or may not have) a particular interest in the outcome.

As for resigning - yep, I did it! And yep, it was a mistake. How can we guarantee that the other candidate won't abuse his power in office again if he's elected? There are no guarantees in this world - ever - but there you go.

You just don't.

Vale!

Cato

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com, "Terry Boyle" <twboyle@... > wrote:
>
> Salve Cato,
>
> I have to say that you have chutzpah. I don't know if I've ever seen anyone endorse themselves before. Comparing resumes, your candidate is the less qualified one. I also have a problem with your candidate abruptly quitting the Senate. What type of guarantee do we have that your candidate will not jump ship once things get too hot in the kitchen next time?
>
> Vale,
>
> QID
>
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Gaius Equitius Cato
> To: Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com
> Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2009 9:25 PM
> Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: A dream come true
>

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66149 From: PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@aol.com Date: 2009-05-27
Subject: Re: A dream come true
Aurelianus Sulla sal.

The moment that you begin any macronational action against Nova Roma is when I will begin action within Nova Roma to have you brought before on charges of treason for harming the Republic.  I used to be for getting rid of the system of jurisprudence in NR but now I will use it against you if you act to harm our organization.  If you want to be a Nova Roman then you should use the internal system here to attempt to resolve problems.  If you cannot work within the organization, then get out of it and quit pretending that you are suing for the good of the Res Publica.  You would only be demonstrating that you are doing it to satisfy personal vendettas and your own sad, sick disappointment that no one respects you.

Vale.


-----Original Message-----
From: Robert Woolwine <l_cornelius_sulla@...>
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wed, 27 May 2009 8:38 am
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: A dream come true



Don't simplify my complaint, oh pantless one.

What NR is plagued with is with lawbreakers serving in positions that can get NR sued and those who want to repeat the same vendetta's.

Face the fact, pantless one - you came across someone who will fight back. That is the fundamental difference between your vendetta against Cincinnatus. He left. And Cassius - he would only take macronational action if NR started it first. Whereas I will do it the moment you move against me.

Vale,

Sulla

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com, David Kling <tau.athanasios@ ...> wrote:
>
> Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus Gaio Equitio Catoni salutem dicit
>
> Now you want to discuss law. Not long ago you were calling for consular
> elections, calling Attorney Generals, and perpetuating the idea that Nova
> Roma was out of compliance. What has plagued Nova Roma is your agenda to
> create chaos, combined with Sulla's desire to get Nova Roma "disbanded."
> And so you talked with a judge and an attorney. That doesn't make you one.
> Maior might not be a practicing attorney, but she did go to law school.
> That gives her an edge that you do not have.
>
> Vale;
>
> Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus
>
> On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 11:26 PM, Gaius Equitius Cato <mlcinnyc@.. .>wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > Cato Maiori sal.
> >
> > Salve.
> >
> > And this kind of answer is *precisely* why so few discussions here go
> > anywhere; the attitude dripping with condescension - even though you are
> > absolutely incorrect in each and every single legal particular.
> >
> > Every. single. one. Just so you know, I had a long, live discussion tonight
> > about this whole exact range of questions with a New York State Court judge
> > *and* an actual, practicing corporate lawyer.
> >
> > So you aren't really a useful part of the discussion any longer, and since
> > you've stated that you don't want to be that works out well.
> >
> > Maybe the citizens who want to give serious thought to my questions might
> > do so, and we can create a useful discussion. The issue I raise has plagued
> > Nova Roma for years and not a single useful resolution has been brought
> > about. Rather than just go blithely along, repeating the same errors over
> > and over again, we might want to actually put some creative thought into
> > this.
> >
> > Vale,
> >
> > Cato
> >
> >
> >
> >
>

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66150 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2009-05-27
Subject: Re: A dream come true
Cato Galerio Aureliano pontifice omnibusque in foro SPD

Salve et salvete.

I hereby swear by that God for Whom I hold place in my private cultus and by the Gods upon Whom the Respublica relies for its well-being that if I am elected censor I will not resign, but will fulfill its obligations.

Vale et valete.

Cato
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66151 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2009-05-27
Subject: Re: A modest suggestion
Cato Mariae Caecae sal.

Salve!

There may still be one. But its existence has not helped so far, and the persistence of the problems that we face is such that I think it's time we looked at it squarely in the face in the Forum, with all citizens being present.

Vale!

Cato


--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "A. Sempronius Regulus" <asempronius.regulus@...> wrote:
>
> There used to be a list devoted to the discussion of law and NR law so it would not flood the main list.
>
> --- On Wed, 5/27/09, C. Maria Caeca <shoshanahathaway@...> wrote:
>
>
> From: C. Maria Caeca <shoshanahathaway@...>
> Subject: [Nova-Roma] A modest suggestion
> To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> Date: Wednesday, May 27, 2009, 3:33 AM
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> You know, I don't mind cogent, logical posts on law or anything else. If I
> understand them, that's great. If I don't, I ask. Rome was a city built on
> law, and if we are going to reconstruct it, I don't see how we can ignore
> that. Since we are incorporated in a State (Maine) of the United States, we
> are bound by certain Maine laws which are applicable, and w should
> understand them, as responsible citizens. Since Maine is in the United
> States, we are bound by applicable United States laws, and, as responsible
> citizens, we should understand them, also.
>
> However, I woule rather see this list contain discussions of law *and*
> discussions of other cultural aspects of NR and Roma Antiqua. Let's not
> *stop* discussion, let's add more!
>
> And yes ... I do know the literary illustion in the title of my post, and it
> was said tongue in cheek.
>
> C. Maria Caeca, who thinks our virtual forum can be as big and as busy as
> *we* make it.
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66152 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2009-05-27
Subject: Re: A dream come true
Cato Galerio Aureliano pontifice sal.

Salve!

Just curious: will you also be requesting that Modianus, if elected, swear that he will not break the law knowingly and willingly again while in office - which he did the last time he held this office?

Vale!

Cato
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66153 From: M•IVL• SEVERVS Date: 2009-05-27
Subject: EDICTVM CONSVLARE X DE DESIGNATIONE SENATORVM DELECTIS QVIBVS ALIQVI

Ex officio consulari:

The following Senators are hereby appointed to complete the membership of the Senate Committees:

Senate Committee on Rules, L. Cornelius Sulla Felix

Senate Budget and Finance Committee, K. Fabius Buteo Quintilianus

Senate Scholarship Committee, C. Equitius Cato

Senate External Relations Committee, Cn. Iulius Cæsar

Senate Committee on Incorporation, Cn. Equitius Marinus, T. Iulius Sabinus, T. Galerius Paulinus, C. Equitius Cato

 
Ex hoc, hi senatores designantur ut numerum aliquorum delectorum Senatús compleant:

Delectis senatús de Regulis, L. Cornelius Sulla Felix

Delectis senatús de Rationibus et Aerario, K. Fabius Buteo Modianus

Delectis senatús de scholaribus alendis, C. Equitius Cato

Delectis senatús de conjunctionibus externis, Cn. Iulius Cæsar

Delectis senatús de rebus constituendis, Cn. Equitius Marinus, T. Iulius Sabinus, T. Galerius Paulinus, C. Equitius Cato

 
Los siguientes senadores son designados para completar el número de integrantes de los comités senatoriales:

Comité de Normas, L. Cornelius Sulla Felix

Comité de Presupuesto y Finanzas, K. Fabius Buteo Quintilianus

Comité de Becas, C. Equitius Cato

Comité de Relaciones Exteriores, Cn. Iulius Cæsar

Comité de Registro Legal , Cn. Equitius Marinus, T. Iulius Sabinus, T. Galerius Paulinus, C. Equitius Cato
 
M•CVR•COMPLVTENSIS
CONSVL•NOVÆ•ROMÆ
M•IVL•SEVERVS
CONSVL•NOVÆ•ROMÆ
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66154 From: M•IVL• SEVERVS Date: 2009-05-27
Subject: EDICTVM CONSVLARE X -CORRECTED VERSION

Edictum consulare de designatione Senatorum delectis quibus aliquid curandum Senatui committitur.

Ex officio consulari:

The following Senators are hereby appointed to complete the membership of the Senate Committees:

Senate Committee on Rules, L. Cornelius Sulla Felix

Senate Budget and Finance Committee, K. Fabius Buteo Quintilianus

Senate Scholarship Committee, C. Equitius Cato

Senate External Relations Committee, Cn. Iulius Cæsar

Senate Committee on Incorporation, Cn. Equitius Marinus, T. Iulius Sabinus, T. Galerius Paulinus, C. Equitius Cato

Given under our hands this 27th day of May 2762 a.V.c (AD 2009) in the consulship of M. Curiatius and M. Iulius.

 

Ex hoc, hi senatores designantur ut numerum aliquorum delectorum Senatús compleant:

Delectis senatús de Regulis, L. Cornelius Sulla Felix

Delectis senatús de Rationibus et Aerario, K. Fabius Buteo Modianus

Delectis senatús de scholaribus alendis, C. Equitius Cato

Delectis senatús de conjunctionibus externis, Cn. Iulius Cæsar

Delectis senatús de rebus constituendis, Cn. Equitius Marinus, T. Iulius Sabinus, T. Galerius Paulinus, C. Equitius Cato

Datum sub manu nostra a.d. VI Kal. Iun. ‡

M. Curiatio M. Iulio cos. ‡ MMDCCLXII a.V.c.

 

Los siguientes senadores son designados para completar el número de integrantes de los comités senatoriales:

Comité de Normas, L. Cornelius Sulla Felix

Comité de Presupuesto y Finanzas, K. Fabius Buteo Quintilianus

Comité de Becas, C. Equitius Cato

Comité de Relaciones Exteriores, Cn. Iulius Cæsar

Comité de Registro Legal , Cn. Equitius Marinus, T. Iulius Sabinus, T. Galerius Paulinus, C. Equitius Cato

Dado por nuestras manos el día 27 de mayo de 2762 (2009 d.n.e.), en el Consulado de M. Curiatius y M. Iulius.

 

M•CVR•COMPLVTENSIS
CONSVL•NOVÆ•ROMÆ
M•IVL•SEVERVS
CONSVL•NOVÆ•ROMÆ
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66155 From: r mills Date: 2009-05-27
Subject: Citizenship Test
Salve Censores,

I would like to re-request the citizenship test.I was unable to access the first one that you sent me.

Appia Flavia Lupa
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66156 From: Roger Date: 2009-05-27
Subject: Article from This Month's Biblical Archaeology Review (BAR): Ancient
[Note: This is an article from this month's BAR (Biblical Archaeology Review) regarding ancient graffiti. Note especially the information regarding Pompeii. -- Lucius Quintius Constantius]

Biblical Views: The Writing on the Wall

By Ben Witherington III

[Copyright 2009 Ben Witherington III and/or Biblical Archaeology Society

Reprinted from BAR 35:03, May/June 2009

www.bib-arch.org]

A fascinating session at last year's annual meeting of the Society of Biblical Literature (SBL) in Boston was dedicated to graffiti, especially early Christian graffiti in Izmir (ancient Smyrna), Turkey.

But what counts as graffiti? Does the word "graffito" imply something clandestine, something possibly illegal, like the defacing of a building by modern graffiti artists in major American cities?

Ancient graffiti were basically of two types: (1) advertisements for politicians or for various sorts of businesses -- often for sex or for the sale of property; (2) religious comments, usually about and for minority or illegal religions or philosophies. We can also distinguish between graffiti that were meant to be timely and were therefore put up only in a semi-permanent way (e.g., painted on a wall) and graffiti that were meant to have a longer shelf life (inscribed into stucco, stone or brick).

The amount of ancient graffiti is surprising, if not shocking. For example, scholars have identified some 10,000 political advertisements in Pompeii! One wonders if the ancient Pompeiians lamented as we do the "billboards" besmirching the beauty of their landscape. If we count up all the graffiti in Pompeii, there seem to have been more writings on the walls than inhabitants within them! Considering the amount of graffiti evidence (usually not the work of the upper classes) plus the evidence on ostraca (pottery sherds with writing on them), this suggests a higher level of literacy in the Greco-Roman world than previously suspected. Usually estimates are that between 10 and 15 percent of the population could read and write. This is likely a very conservative estimate.

In my judgment there is a difference between the ability to read and the ability to write. Reading seems to have been a more widespread skill than writing in the first century. Writing was more of a specialized art, especially when it involved engraving texts into hard surfaces, which would require a skilled scribe or partisan. Propaganda graffiti surely assumed that a significant segment of the population could read the inscriptions.

One of the most enlightening lectures at the SBL session was Roger Bagnall's "New Graffiti from Smyrna in the context of early Christianity." He concentrated on what was found in a basilica basement in the vast Smyrna agora. (In the Roman world a basilica was a type of public building, often a hall of justice; only later was its architectural pattern taken over by the church and used as a design for churches.) The basilica had collapsed in 178 A.D. due to a massive earthquake but was later reconstructed. The part of the basilica Bagnall focused on comes from the late first and early second centuries. Plaster or stucco covered the walls that had graffiti on them. The assortment of graffiti was considerable, focusing on sex, love, civic pride, politics and religion, all jumbled together.

One of the most interesting of Bagnall's examples reads [Greek font] ("the one who has given the Spirit" -- namely Kyrios, the Lord Jesus). Bagnall claims that this is probably the earliest evidence of Christian graffiti ever discovered. What was the function of this graffito, inscribed in a public place? It does not seem to have been an advertisment to bring in outsiders, but rather for insiders (Christians), who knew the key cliches, phrases and code words to make sense of the graffito. To insiders it announced that there were Christians in the city with whom other Christians could socialize and worship.

The reason for coded communication is obvious. It could be dangerous to be an early Christian in ancient Smyrna. Polycarp, a bishop of Smyrna in the first and second centuries, after surviving an attempt by the authorities to burn him at the stake, was stabbed to death.

Christianity was categorized as a superstitio in the Roman Empire before Constantine legalized it in the fourth century, and as such Christians were subject to persecution, prosecution and occasionally execution. The Christian graffiti in Izmir are significant because they confirm both the early presence of Christians in that city and their need to communicate in code.

The papers at the SBL session also help us to understand the level of literacy in the early Christian world. That world was by no means populated only by "womens, slaves and minors" (i.e., the illiterate) as we might assume from the polemics of Greco-Romans who despised early Christianity. On the contrary, Christians left their mark not only through espistles and gospels, but also through graffiti.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66157 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2009-05-27
Subject: De censura
De censura

  A. Tullia Scholastic Ti. Galerio Paulino Q. Iunio Dominico quiritibus bonae voluntatis S.P.D.

  

Salve Quintus Iunius Dominicus
 
I can assure you that if Cato wins the election and even thinks of resigning someone will find him with my fingerprints around his neck.  : )

    ATS:  I hope a certain Mr. Cuomo is not on this list, lest you find yourself a guest of NYS...  ;-)
 
Vale
 
Paulinus

Valete.  
 

To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
From: twboyle@...
Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 23:29:54 -0400
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: A dream come true



    Salve Cato,

       I see two concerns with your response.  The first being that we cannot get any level of guarantee that you won't abruptly quit if elected censor when the pressure gets too be to much.  The second is, I feel you abused your power as a senator by calling for the removal of the consuls without cause on the ML and bellyaching about laws being broken.  The general populace believes a Senator has inside knowledge.  This was a blatant abuse of power for political reasons.  If it wasn't than you wouldn't have suddenly dropped the charges.

    Vale,
  
        QID

 
 
 
 
----- Original Message -----
From: Gaius Equitius Cato <mailto:mlcinnyc@...>  
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2009 10:48 PM
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: A dream come true

Cato QID sal.

Salve!

Of course you've seen candidates endorse themselves! Whenever they declare a candidacy for something they are saying, "I have what it takes to get this job done - and more!"

Perhaps I have more to learn, technical-minded, than the other gentleman.

But there is a huge, vast, yawning chasm of a difference between learning technical stuff and a commitment to doing what is best regardless of who may have (or may not have) a particular interest in the outcome.

As for resigning - yep, I did it! And yep, it was a mistake. How can we guarantee that the other candidate won't abuse his power in office again if he's elected? There are no guarantees in this world - ever - but there you go.

You just don't.

Vale!

Cato

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Terry Boyle" <twboyle@...> wrote:
>
> Salve Cato,
>
> I have to say that you have chutzpah. I don't know if I've ever seen anyone endorse themselves before. Comparing resumes, your candidate is the less qualified one. I also have a problem with your candidate abruptly quitting the Senate. What type of guarantee do we have that your candidate will not jump ship once things get too hot in the kitchen next time?
>
> Vale,
>
> QID
>
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Gaius Equitius Cato
> To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2009 9:25 PM
> Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: A dream come true
>



  
    

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66159 From: Maior Date: 2009-05-27
Subject: Re: legal discussions (was a dream come true)
Salve Cato;
I agree with Sempronius Regulus, let's take the legal discussions to the group created for law, it occupies a lot of bandwith for so few citizens. And there is tepid interest.

I don't practice the law, I went to law school and can read a statute properly. And when I am not sure I ask Equestria Laeca our CFO as she has up-to-date knowledge of corporation law. You should turn to her if you have legal questions, not an outside person, we need to be on the same page: cooperating,productive.

bene vale in pacem deorum
Marca Hortensia Maior



>
> Cato Galerio Aureliano pontifice sal.
>
> Salve!
>
> Just curious: will you also be requesting that Modianus, if elected, swear that he will not break the law knowingly and willingly again while in office - which he did the last time he held this office?
>
> Vale!
>
> Cato
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66160 From: C. Maria Caeca Date: 2009-05-27
Subject: Re: A modest suggestion
Salve Gualtere et salvete omnes,
 
Let me say this again, in a different way.  It is my firm belief that *all* topics of discussion having to do with *any* aspect of our organization, or with Roma Antiqua are valid, and that most of them are pertinent, and worthy of being pursued on this, our main forum.  True, some topics will interest some citizens less than other topics, but we are a very broad ranging group.  By compartmentalizing discussion, and shunting it off on to specialized lists, we are, in essence, dividing our citizens into what can become relatively isolated "pigeonholes" and robbing ourselves of a sense of community that I feel will do far more than any amount of oratory to help us determine how we want to grow, and in which directions we want to go, and then to help take us there.
 
I do realize that this can be an extremely busy list (especially during fights and political campaigns), and I realize we are all busy, have outside lives, and may not have time to read everything all the time.  That's fine, but there are 2 excellent alternatives one can use to save time.  The first is to read the list on the web, and the 2nd is to subscribe to the NR-announce list, where only official and important information is sent.  I hate to harp, but until we start really communicating, and I don't think that can be done through a narrow range of official topics, it will be hard, and become harder and harder to actually work together as a community.
 
And before I am chastised, yes, I am keenly, and gratefully, aware of the work that goes on behind the scenes, and of the many Cives who seek nothing but to be allowed to contribute their time and effort and to do a good job for an organization they care about deeply.
 
Respectfully,
C. Maria Caeca
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Wednesday, May 27, 2009 9:41 AM
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] A modest suggestion

There used to be a list devoted to the discussion of law and NR law so it would not flood the main list.

--- On Wed, 5/27/09, C. Maria Caeca <shoshanahathaway@...> wrote:

From: C. Maria Caeca <shoshanahathaway@comcast..net>
Subject: [Nova-Roma] A modest suggestion
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Date: Wednesday, May 27, 2009, 3:33 AM

You know, I don't mind cogent, logical posts on law or anything else. If I
understand them, that's great. If I don't, I ask. Rome was a city built on
law, and if we are going to reconstruct it, I don't see how we can ignore
that. Since we are incorporated in a State (Maine) of the United States, we
are bound by certain Maine laws which are applicable, and w should
understand them, as responsible citizens. Since Maine is in the United
States, we are bound by applicable United States laws, and, as responsible
citizens, we should understand them, also.

However, I woule rather see this list contain discussions of law *and*
discussions of other cultural aspects of NR and Roma Antiqua. Let's not
*stop* discussion, let's add more!

And yes ... I do know the literary illustion in the title of my post, and it
was said tongue in cheek.

C. Maria Caeca, who thinks our virtual forum can be as big and as busy as
*we* make it.




No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 8.5.339 / Virus Database: 270.12.42/2137 - Release Date: 05/27/09 07:50:00

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66161 From: gualterus_graecus Date: 2009-05-27
Subject: Re: A modest suggestion
Salve Caeca,

Hmmm, I'm not sure why you addressed me since I didn't get into this particular debate. :)

Vale,

Gualterus

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "C. Maria Caeca" <shoshanahathaway@...> wrote:
>
> Salve Gualtere et salvete omnes,
>
> Let me say this again, in a different way. It is my firm belief that *all* topics of discussion having to do with *any* aspect of our organization, or with Roma Antiqua are valid, and that most of them are pertinent, and worthy of being pursued on this, our main forum. True, some topics will interest some citizens less than other topics, but we are a very broad ranging group. By compartmentalizing discussion, and shunting it off on to specialized lists, we are, in essence, dividing our citizens into what can become relatively isolated "pigeonholes" and robbing ourselves of a sense of community that I feel will do far more than any amount of oratory to help us determine how we want to grow, and in which directions we want to go, and then to help take us there.
>
> I do realize that this can be an extremely busy list (especially during fights and political campaigns), and I realize we are all busy, have outside lives, and may not have time to read everything all the time. That's fine, but there are 2 excellent alternatives one can use to save time. The first is to read the list on the web, and the 2nd is to subscribe to the NR-announce list, where only official and important information is sent. I hate to harp, but until we start really communicating, and I don't think that can be done through a narrow range of official topics, it will be hard, and become harder and harder to actually work together as a community.
>
> And before I am chastised, yes, I am keenly, and gratefully, aware of the work that goes on behind the scenes, and of the many Cives who seek nothing but to be allowed to contribute their time and effort and to do a good job for an organization they care about deeply.
>
> Respectfully,
> C. Maria Caeca
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: A. Sempronius Regulus
> To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Wednesday, May 27, 2009 9:41 AM
> Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] A modest suggestion
>
>
>
>
> There used to be a list devoted to the discussion of law and NR law so it would not flood the main list.
>
> --- On Wed, 5/27/09, C. Maria Caeca <shoshanahathaway@...> wrote:
>
>
> From: C. Maria Caeca <shoshanahathaway@...>
> Subject: [Nova-Roma] A modest suggestion
> To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> Date: Wednesday, May 27, 2009, 3:33 AM
>
>
> You know, I don't mind cogent, logical posts on law or anything else. If I
> understand them, that's great. If I don't, I ask. Rome was a city built on
> law, and if we are going to reconstruct it, I don't see how we can ignore
> that. Since we are incorporated in a State (Maine) of the United States, we
> are bound by certain Maine laws which are applicable, and w should
> understand them, as responsible citizens. Since Maine is in the United
> States, we are bound by applicable United States laws, and, as responsible
> citizens, we should understand them, also.
>
> However, I woule rather see this list contain discussions of law *and*
> discussions of other cultural aspects of NR and Roma Antiqua. Let's not
> *stop* discussion, let's add more!
>
> And yes ... I do know the literary illustion in the title of my post, and it
> was said tongue in cheek.
>
> C. Maria Caeca, who thinks our virtual forum can be as big and as busy as
> *we* make it.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> Version: 8.5.339 / Virus Database: 270.12.42/2137 - Release Date: 05/27/09 07:50:00
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66162 From: A. Sempronius Regulus Date: 2009-05-27
Subject: Re: A modest suggestion and Moderators.
Salve,
The problem with the discussion about law, compliance, Maine, Sulla's insistence on being correctly addressed while he floats inflated or fake titles (e.g., "college professor" with two masters, right -- only at one of those nationally accredited - for profit - papermills), Cato''s elusiveness about whether he will offer public sacrifice to the gods (a question that came up on the Religio list where a vow to respect and honor was not enough because it was primarily the magistrates (not priests) that offered public sacrifice) and so on being on the mail list is that the threads go way off topic and spill over into other threads. A Dream come true was about Livia happy she could speak Latin. Then the Cato, law, and Sulla crap spins into it.
 
I've taken to just deleting posts from the main list, except for a select few, because the individuals who are embrioled in this debate won't keep it in the threads of the debate but will take over the other threads as well where people NOT interested in it tried starting a separate conversation to have it invaded.. Perhaps the moderators should reject any post that is about this law, maine, breaking law, which magistrates broke the law and who is going to sue whom that does not stay within a clearly identified topic thread. 
 
Vale,
A. Sempronius Regulus
 
 

--- On Wed, 5/27/09, C. Maria Caeca <shoshanahathaway@...> wrote:

From: C. Maria Caeca <shoshanahathaway@comcast..net>
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] A modest suggestion
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Date: Wednesday, May 27, 2009, 8:37 PM

Salve Gualtere et salvete omnes,
 
Let me say this again, in a different way.  It is my firm belief that *all* topics of discussion having to do with *any* aspect of our organization, or with Roma Antiqua are valid, and that most of them are pertinent, and worthy of being pursued on this, our main forum.  True, some topics will interest some citizens less than other topics, but we are a very broad ranging group.  By compartmentalizing discussion, and shunting it off on to specialized lists, we are, in essence, dividing our citizens into what can become relatively isolated "pigeonholes" and robbing ourselves of a sense of community that I feel will do far more than any amount of oratory to help us determine how we want to grow, and in which directions we want to go, and then to help take us there.
 
I do realize that this can be an extremely busy list (especially during fights and political campaigns), and I realize we are all busy, have outside lives, and may not have time to read everything all the time.  That's fine, but there are 2 excellent alternatives one can use to save time.  The first is to read the list on the web, and the 2nd is to subscribe to the NR-announce list, where only official and important information is sent.  I hate to harp, but until we start really communicating, and I don't think that can be done through a narrow range of official topics, it will be hard, and become harder and harder to actually work together as a community.
 
And before I am chastised, yes, I am keenly, and gratefully, aware of the work that goes on behind the scenes, and of the many Cives who seek nothing but to be allowed to contribute their time and effort and to do a good job for an organization they care about deeply.
 
Respectfully,
C. Maria Caeca
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Wednesday, May 27, 2009 9:41 AM
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] A modest suggestion

There used to be a list devoted to the discussion of law and NR law so it would not flood the main list.

--- On Wed, 5/27/09, C. Maria Caeca <shoshanahathaway@ comcast.net> wrote:

From: C. Maria Caeca <shoshanahathaway@ comcast.. net>
Subject: [Nova-Roma] A modest suggestion
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com
Date: Wednesday, May 27, 2009, 3:33 AM

You know, I don't mind cogent, logical posts on law or anything else. If I
understand them, that's great. If I don't, I ask. Rome was a city built on
law, and if we are going to reconstruct it, I don't see how we can ignore
that. Since we are incorporated in a State (Maine) of the United States, we
are bound by certain Maine laws which are applicable, and w should
understand them, as responsible citizens. Since Maine is in the United
States, we are bound by applicable United States laws, and, as responsible
citizens, we should understand them, also.

However, I woule rather see this list contain discussions of law *and*
discussions of other cultural aspects of NR and Roma Antiqua. Let's not
*stop* discussion, let's add more!

And yes ... I do know the literary illustion in the title of my post, and it
was said tongue in cheek.

C. Maria Caeca, who thinks our virtual forum can be as big and as busy as
*we* make it.




No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 8.5.339 / Virus Database: 270.12.42/2137 - Release Date: 05/27/09 07:50:00

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66163 From: C. Maria Caeca Date: 2009-05-27
Subject: Re: A modest suggestion
Oops! My apologies, Gualterus! I thought you wrote a post to which I was
responding. Since you didn't, again my apologies.

Caeca
----- Original Message -----
From: "gualterus_graecus" <waltms1@...>
To: <Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Wednesday, May 27, 2009 7:03 PM
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: A modest suggestion


> Salve Caeca,
>
> Hmmm, I'm not sure why you addressed me since I didn't get into this
> particular debate. :)
>
> Vale,
>
> Gualterus
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "C. Maria Caeca" <shoshanahathaway@...>
> wrote:
>>
>> Salve Gualtere et salvete omnes,
>>
>> Let me say this again, in a different way. It is my firm belief that
>> *all* topics of discussion having to do with *any* aspect of our
>> organization, or with Roma Antiqua are valid, and that most of them are
>> pertinent, and worthy of being pursued on this, our main forum. True,
>> some topics will interest some citizens less than other topics, but we
>> are a very broad ranging group. By compartmentalizing discussion, and
>> shunting it off on to specialized lists, we are, in essence, dividing our
>> citizens into what can become relatively isolated "pigeonholes" and
>> robbing ourselves of a sense of community that I feel will do far more
>> than any amount of oratory to help us determine how we want to grow, and
>> in which directions we want to go, and then to help take us there.
>>
>> I do realize that this can be an extremely busy list (especially during
>> fights and political campaigns), and I realize we are all busy, have
>> outside lives, and may not have time to read everything all the time.
>> That's fine, but there are 2 excellent alternatives one can use to save
>> time. The first is to read the list on the web, and the 2nd is to
>> subscribe to the NR-announce list, where only official and important
>> information is sent. I hate to harp, but until we start really
>> communicating, and I don't think that can be done through a narrow range
>> of official topics, it will be hard, and become harder and harder to
>> actually work together as a community.
>>
>> And before I am chastised, yes, I am keenly, and gratefully, aware of the
>> work that goes on behind the scenes, and of the many Cives who seek
>> nothing but to be allowed to contribute their time and effort and to do a
>> good job for an organization they care about deeply.
>>
>> Respectfully,
>> C. Maria Caeca
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: A. Sempronius Regulus
>> To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
>> Sent: Wednesday, May 27, 2009 9:41 AM
>> Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] A modest suggestion
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> There used to be a list devoted to the discussion of law and NR
>> law so it would not flood the main list.
>>
>> --- On Wed, 5/27/09, C. Maria Caeca <shoshanahathaway@...> wrote:
>>
>>
>> From: C. Maria Caeca <shoshanahathaway@...>
>> Subject: [Nova-Roma] A modest suggestion
>> To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
>> Date: Wednesday, May 27, 2009, 3:33 AM
>>
>>
>> You know, I don't mind cogent, logical posts on law or anything
>> else. If I
>> understand them, that's great. If I don't, I ask. Rome was a
>> city built on
>> law, and if we are going to reconstruct it, I don't see how we
>> can ignore
>> that. Since we are incorporated in a State (Maine) of the
>> United States, we
>> are bound by certain Maine laws which are applicable, and w
>> should
>> understand them, as responsible citizens. Since Maine is in the
>> United
>> States, we are bound by applicable United States laws, and, as
>> responsible
>> citizens, we should understand them, also.
>>
>> However, I woule rather see this list contain discussions of
>> law *and*
>> discussions of other cultural aspects of NR and Roma Antiqua.
>> Let's not
>> *stop* discussion, let's add more!
>>
>> And yes ... I do know the literary illustion in the title of my
>> post, and it
>> was said tongue in cheek.
>>
>> C. Maria Caeca, who thinks our virtual forum can be as big and
>> as busy as
>> *we* make it.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>>
>>
>> No virus found in this incoming message.
>> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
>> Version: 8.5.339 / Virus Database: 270.12.42/2137 - Release Date:
>> 05/27/09 07:50:00
>>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 8.5.339 / Virus Database: 270.12.42/2137 - Release Date: 05/27/09
07:50:00
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66164 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2009-05-27
Subject: Re: A modest suggestion and Moderators.
Cato Sempronio Regulo sal.

Salve!

Well, you certainly haven't followed the thread very well. First of all, I was not the one who brought up the legal business in the thread, Livia Plauta was.

Second, I have not said a word about offering public "sacrifice" to the Gods so your imagined "elusiveness" is precisely that - imagined.

Trying to control the connections people make in open conversation is ridiculous; it doesn't happen in real speech so why try to force it on our Respublica?

Delete what you want, read what you want, say what you want.

Vale,

Cato
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66165 From: Timothy or Stephen Gallagher Date: 2009-05-27
Subject: Our Fourm
Salvete

From time to time there have been calls to move the discussion of law or politics to another list. It was a stupid idea then and it remains a stupid idea now. It would also be a stupid idea not to talk about other things as well.

This is the forum of Nova Roma. Get engaged in the conversations you like,ignore the ones you don't and for Pete's sake or Titus's sake take the time to start one on a topic you do care about.

2000 years ago Titus, Felix and hundreds of other Romans simply waked into the forum and what do you know, they met other Romans and conversations started. The talked about the weather, the newest horse in the Circus. Who was sleeping with whom. They talked about the price of candles and sandals.

The discussed the on going war in__________________( fill in the blank). The asked each other about their kids and their kids kids. The wanted the skinny on the new neighbors and on why so and so left town so quickly.

The talked politics, religion, food, the price of slaves, the cost of a decent meal out, and the rise in rents.

Everyday or almost every day two Nova Roman have posted , over the years, a daily digest for the enlightenment of all of us. In all of that time how many of those posts have led to a conversation or even a question. Very few it would seem.

In stead of Xitching   We could discuss:

Roman Summer camps ( ours)
The two pending Conventus
The best Roman recipe for chicken
Should Nova Roma offer its own wine for sale?
Any of the 210 reasons given for the fall of Rome.
We could ask, Why did Rome last as long as it did?
Steve Saylor and historic Roman fiction.
Religion
How can Nova Roma raise a million dollars?
Roman pluming
Roman city planning
Rome's apparent lack of scientific or geographic interest
The Nova Roman tax system and the need to increase the annual tax amount.
Roman ship building
Nova Roma laws
How to edit the Wiki.
How to upload photos to the Wiki.
Coke or Pepsi?
Medium rare or medium well? 

For Titus's sake pick something and start a conversation.

Valete

Paulinus 


Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66166 From: Maior Date: 2009-05-27
Subject: Re: Our Fourm
Salve Pauline;
there are sub lists for people with a passion for a particular topic/

Not every wants to talk about the cultus deorum 24/7 or is keen to discuss minutiae. So we go to the religio romana list to discuss the religio in detail; lares compitales, ritual fires, all fascinating topics to me but maybe not to everyone on the ML so we don't bore the pants off people.

I've posted on the cultus deorum here on the ML, fine, topics of general interest. Talk about Roman law during the republic, fine.

But we are basically sick to death of endless posts on NR and Maine corporate law, corporate compliance, the Maine AG, Sulla etc it's worse than Tartarus:) So be considerate and take that fascinating topic (only to you) to the laws sub list.
bene vale in pacem deorum
Maior
>
> Salvete
>
> From time to time there have been calls to move the discussion of law or politics to another list. It was a stupid idea then and it remains a stupid idea now. It would also be a stupid idea not to talk about other things as well.
>
> This is the forum of Nova Roma. Get engaged in the conversations you like,ignore the ones you don't and for Pete's sake or Titus's sake take the time to start one on a topic you do care about.
>
> 2000 years ago Titus, Felix and hundreds of other Romans simply waked into the forum and what do you know, they met other Romans and conversations started. The talked about the weather, the newest horse in the Circus. Who was sleeping with whom. They talked about the price of candles and sandals.
>
>
> The discussed the on going war in__________________( fill in the blank). The asked each other about their kids and their kids kids. The wanted the skinny on the new neighbors and on why so and so left town so quickly.
>
> The talked politics, religion, food, the price of slaves, the cost of a decent meal out, and the rise in rents.
>
> Everyday or almost every day two Nova Roman have posted , over the years, a daily digest for the enlightenment of all of us. In all of that time how many of those posts have led to a conversation or even a question. Very few it would seem.
>
> In stead of Xitching We could discuss:
>
> Roman Summer camps ( ours)
> The two pending Conventus
> The best Roman recipe for chicken
> Should Nova Roma offer its own wine for sale?
> Any of the 210 reasons given for the fall of Rome.
> We could ask, Why did Rome last as long as it did?
> Steve Saylor and historic Roman fiction.
> Religion
>
> How can Nova Roma raise a million dollars?
> Roman pluming
> Roman city planning
> Rome's apparent lack of scientific or geographic interest
> The Nova Roman tax system and the need to increase the annual tax amount.
> Roman ship building
> Nova Roma laws
> How to edit the Wiki.
> How to upload photos to the Wiki.
> Coke or Pepsi?
> Medium rare or medium well?
>
>
> For Titus's sake pick something and start a conversation.
>
> Valete
>
> Paulinus
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66167 From: Robert Levee Date: 2009-05-27
Subject: Re: Our Fourm
Salve et salvete,

I would like to know some things related to Nova Roma offering it's own wine selection.For instance has this been a subject that has been discussed in the past?If so what were the ideas and conclusions if any?How would Nova Roma seek to break into this market?Any ideas?

Vale et valete,
Ap.Galerius Aurelianus

--- On Wed, 5/27/09, Timothy or Stephen Gallagher <spqr753@...> wrote:

> From: Timothy or Stephen Gallagher <spqr753@...>
> Subject: [Nova-Roma] Our Fourm
> To: "Nova-Roma" <nova-roma@yahoogroups.com>
> Date: Wednesday, May 27, 2009, 8:51 PM
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Salvete
>
> From time to time there have been calls to move the
> discussion of law or politics to another list. It was a
> stupid idea then and it remains a stupid idea now. It would
> also be a stupid idea not to talk about other things as
> well.
>
> This is the forum of Nova Roma. Get engaged in the
> conversations you like,ignore the ones you don't and for
> Pete's sake or Titus's sake take the time to start
> one on a topic you do care about.
>
> 2000 years ago Titus, Felix and hundreds of other Romans
> simply waked into the forum and what do you know, they met
> other Romans and conversations started. The talked about the
> weather, the newest horse in the Circus. Who was sleeping
> with whom. They talked about the price of candles and
> sandals.
>
>
> The discussed the on going war in__________ ________( fill
> in the blank). The asked each other about their kids and
> their kids kids. The wanted the skinny on the new neighbors
> and on why so and so left town so quickly.
>
> The talked politics, religion, food, the price of slaves,
> the cost of a decent meal out, and the rise in rents.
>
> Everyday or almost every day two Nova Roman have posted ,
> over the years, a daily digest for the enlightenment of all
> of us. In all of that time how many of those posts have led
> to a conversation or even a question. Very few it would
> seem.
>
> In stead of Xitching   We could discuss:
>
> Roman Summer camps ( ours)
> The two pending Conventus
> The best Roman recipe for chicken
> Should Nova Roma offer its own wine for sale?
> Any of the 210 reasons given for the fall of Rome.
> We could ask, Why did Rome last as long as it did?
> Steve Saylor and historic Roman fiction.
> Religion
>
> How can Nova Roma raise a million dollars?
> Roman pluming
> Roman city planning
> Rome's apparent lack of scientific or geographic
> interest
> The Nova Roman tax system and the need to increase the
> annual tax amount.
> Roman ship building
> Nova Roma laws
> How to edit the Wiki.
> How to upload photos to the Wiki.
> Coke or Pepsi?
> Medium rare or medium well? 
>
>
> For Titus's sake pick something and start a
> conversation.
>
> Valete
>
> Paulinus 
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66168 From: C. Maria Caeca Date: 2009-05-27
Subject: chit chat
Salvete omnes,
 
On the question of wine ... wouldn't we need to get all sorts of beaurocratic permissions to sell wine, not to mention learning (very carefully) which U.S. States do not permit wine to be shipped  to residents? (to my Non U.S. Amici, if I have any) Yes, that *can* be a problem here, and stop laughing! (big smile).  But, once the administrivia was dealt with, would we just make provide selections from vendors (hopefully on the Macellum) or ... what about producing our own?  I know of 1 brewer, who has also made Mead (waves to Venator), do we have any vintners among us?
 
Side note:  I just got Antony and Cleopatra in audible format, by Colleen McCullough!  (guess what *I'll* be doing most of this weekend? I have to wait, lest I do my usual irresponsible thing when confronted with the choices of sleep or a good book).
 
And, finally ... Pepsi :).
 
Caeca, who was almost ready to throw up her hands and wish you all joy of your anger and vitriol. (not that I could have done it), so, thank you, Censor.  You even got a grin out of me, not that *that* matters in the least.
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Wednesday, May 27, 2009 8:51 PM
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Our Fourm

Salvete

From time to time there have been calls to move the discussion of law or politics to another list. It was a stupid idea then and it remains a stupid idea now. It would also be a stupid idea not to talk about other things as well.

This is the forum of Nova Roma. Get engaged in the conversations you like,ignore the ones you don't and for Pete's sake or Titus's sake take the time to start one on a topic you do care about.

2000 years ago Titus, Felix and hundreds of other Romans simply waked into the forum and what do you know, they met other Romans and conversations started. The talked about the weather, the newest horse in the Circus. Who was sleeping with whom. They talked about the price of candles and sandals.

The discussed the on going war in__________________( fill in the blank). The asked each other about their kids and their kids kids. The wanted the skinny on the new neighbors and on why so and so left town so quickly.

The talked politics, religion, food, the price of slaves, the cost of a decent meal out, and the rise in rents.

Everyday or almost every day two Nova Roman have posted , over the years, a daily digest for the enlightenment of all of us. In all of that time how many of those posts have led to a conversation or even a question. Very few it would seem.

In stead of Xitching   We could discuss:

Roman Summer camps ( ours)
The two pending Conventus
The best Roman recipe for chicken
Should Nova Roma offer its own wine for sale?
Any of the 210 reasons given for the fall of Rome.
We could ask, Why did Rome last as long as it did?
Steve Saylor and historic Roman fiction.
Religion
How can Nova Roma raise a million dollars?
Roman pluming
Roman city planning
Rome's apparent lack of scientific or geographic interest
The Nova Roman tax system and the need to increase the annual tax amount.
Roman ship building
Nova Roma laws
How to edit the Wiki.
How to upload photos to the Wiki.
Coke or Pepsi?
Medium rare or medium well? 

For Titus's sake pick something and start a conversation.

Valete

Paulinus 




No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 8.5.339 / Virus Database: 270.12.42/2137 - Release Date: 05/27/09 07:50:00

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66169 From: Timothy or Stephen Gallagher Date: 2009-05-27
Subject: Re: Our Fourm
Salvete Cousin
 
I am glad you asked. I live near a winery in Terra Maria and we can select a wine/s and have our own label put on it.
 
I am sure others live new other wineries as well. So this could be a great way to make money and increase our public view. We could also do bottled water.
 
While "aquafina" is taken I am sure our Latinist can come up with a great name. 
 
Valete
 
Paulinus
 

To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
From: galerius_of_rome@...
Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 18:09:25 -0700
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Our Fourm




Salve et salvete,

I would like to know some things related to Nova Roma offering it's own wine selection.For instance has this been a subject that has been discussed in the past?If so what were the ideas and conclusions if any?How would Nova Roma seek to break into this market?Any ideas?

Vale et valete,
Ap.Galerius Aurelianus

--- On Wed, 5/27/09, Timothy or Stephen Gallagher <spqr753@msn. com> wrote:

> From: Timothy or Stephen Gallagher <spqr753@msn. com>
> Subject: [Nova-Roma] Our Fourm
> To: "Nova-Roma" <nova-roma@yahoogrou ps.com>
> Date: Wednesday, May 27, 2009, 8:51 PM
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Salvete
>
> From time to time there have been calls to move the
> discussion of law or politics to another list. It was a
> stupid idea then and it remains a stupid idea now. It would
> also be a stupid idea not to talk about other things as
> well.
>
> This is the forum of Nova Roma. Get engaged in the
> conversations you like,ignore the ones you don't and for
> Pete's sake or Titus's sake take the time to start
> one on a topic you do care about.
>
> 2000 years ago Titus, Felix and hundreds of other Romans
> simply waked into the forum and what do you know, they met
> other Romans and conversations started. The talked about the
> weather, the newest horse in the Circus. Who was sleeping
> with whom. They talked about the price of candles and
> sandals.
>
>
> The discussed the on going war in__________ ________( fill
> in the blank). The asked each other about their kids and
> their kids kids. The wanted the skinny on the new neighbors
> and on why so and so left town so quickly.
>
> The talked politics, religion, food, the price of slaves,
> the cost of a decent meal out, and the rise in rents.
>
> Everyday or almost every day two Nova Roman have posted ,
> over the years, a daily digest for the enlightenment of all
> of us. In all of that time how many of those posts have led
> to a conversation or even a question. Very few it would
> seem.
>
> In stead of Xitching   We could discuss:
>
> Roman Summer camps ( ours)
> The two pending Conventus
> The best Roman recipe for chicken
> Should Nova Roma offer its own wine for sale?
> Any of the 210 reasons given for the fall of Rome.
> We could ask, Why did Rome last as long as it did?
> Steve Saylor and historic Roman fiction.
> Religion
>
> How can Nova Roma raise a million dollars?
> Roman pluming
> Roman city planning
> Rome's apparent lack of scientific or geographic
> interest
> The Nova Roman tax system and the need to increase the
> annual tax amount.
> Roman ship building
> Nova Roma laws
> How to edit the Wiki.
> How to upload photos to the Wiki.
> Coke or Pepsi?
> Medium rare or medium well? 
>
>
> For Titus's sake pick something and start a
> conversation.
>
> Valete
>
> Paulinus 
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>


Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66170 From: Timothy or Stephen Gallagher Date: 2009-05-27
Subject: Re: chit chat
Salve Caeca
 
Thanks
 
And, finally ... Pepsi :).  me too.
 
Vale
 
Paulinus
 
 

 

To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
From: shoshanahathaway@...
Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 21:24:33 -0400
Subject: [Nova-Roma] chit chat



Salvete omnes,
 
On the question of wine ... wouldn't we need to get all sorts of beaurocratic permissions to sell wine, not to mention learning (very carefully) which U.S. States do not permit wine to be shipped  to residents? (to my Non U.S. Amici, if I have any) Yes, that *can* be a problem here, and stop laughing! (big smile).  But, once the administrivia was dealt with, would we just make provide selections from vendors (hopefully on the Macellum) or ... what about producing our own?  I know of 1 brewer, who has also made Mead (waves to Venator), do we have any vintners among us?
 
Side note:  I just got Antony and Cleopatra in audible format, by Colleen McCullough!  (guess what *I'll* be doing most of this weekend? I have to wait, lest I do my usual irresponsible thing when confronted with the choices of sleep or a good book).
 
And, finally ... Pepsi :).
 
Caeca, who was almost ready to throw up her hands and wish you all joy of your anger and vitriol. (not that I could have done it), so, thank you, Censor.  You even got a grin out of me, not that *that* matters in the least.
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Wednesday, May 27, 2009 8:51 PM
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Our Fourm

Salvete

From time to time there have been calls to move the discussion of law or politics to another list. It was a stupid idea then and it remains a stupid idea now. It would also be a stupid idea not to talk about other things as well.

This is the forum of Nova Roma. Get engaged in the conversations you like,ignore the ones you don't and for Pete's sake or Titus's sake take the time to start one on a topic you do care about.

2000 years ago Titus, Felix and hundreds of other Romans simply waked into the forum and what do you know, they met other Romans and conversations started. The talked about the weather, the newest horse in the Circus. Who was sleeping with whom. They talked about the price of candles and sandals.

The discussed the on going war in__________ ________( fill in the blank). The asked each other about their kids and their kids kids. The wanted the skinny on the new neighbors and on why so and so left town so quickly.

The talked politics, religion, food, the price of slaves, the cost of a decent meal out, and the rise in rents.

Everyday or almost every day two Nova Roman have posted , over the years, a daily digest for the enlightenment of all of us. In all of that time how many of those posts have led to a conversation or even a question. Very few it would seem.

In stead of Xitching   We could discuss:

Roman Summer camps ( ours)
The two pending Conventus
The best Roman recipe for chicken
Should Nova Roma offer its own wine for sale?
Any of the 210 reasons given for the fall of Rome.
We could ask, Why did Rome last as long as it did?
Steve Saylor and historic Roman fiction.
Religion
How can Nova Roma raise a million dollars?
Roman pluming
Roman city planning
Rome's apparent lack of scientific or geographic interest
The Nova Roman tax system and the need to increase the annual tax amount.
Roman ship building
Nova Roma laws
How to edit the Wiki.
How to upload photos to the Wiki.
Coke or Pepsi?
Medium rare or medium well? 

For Titus's sake pick something and start a conversation.

Valete

Paulinus 





No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 8.5.339 / Virus Database: 270.12.42/2137 - Release Date: 05/27/09 07:50:00


Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66171 From: C. Maria Caeca Date: 2009-05-27
Subject: wine!
Salve Censor, et salvete omnes
 
Sorry, Appius, I'm not ignoring you ... I just don't know how to specifically greet 2 people in Latin, yet. :).  The advantages of using a winery and getting wine private labeled (hmmm ...do I foresee a label design contest?) is that it would be available immediately, and winery knows all the bureahcratic administrivia, so we won't have to worry about it, just that *they* know and follow it, which, of course, is a given, or they wouldn't stay in business.
 
However ... I'd like to see that as a relatively short term goal.  I'd still love to see us, at some point, produce and sell our own!
 
Vale et valete bene,
C. Maria Caeca
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Wednesday, May 27, 2009 9:34 PM
Subject: RE: [Nova-Roma] Our Fourm

Salvete Cousin
 
I am glad you asked. I live near a winery in Terra Maria and we can select a wine/s and have our own label put on it.
 
I am sure others live new other wineries as well. So this could be a great way to make money and increase our public view. We could also do bottled water.
 
While "aquafina" is taken I am sure our Latinist can come up with a great name. 
 
Valete
 
Paulinus
 

To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
From: galerius_of_rome@...
Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 18:09:25 -0700
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Our Fourm




Salve et salvete,

I would like to know some things related to Nova Roma offering it's own wine selection.For instance has this been a subject that has been discussed in the past?If so what were the ideas and conclusions if any?How would Nova Roma seek to break into this market?Any ideas?

Vale et valete,
Ap.Galerius Aurelianus

--- On Wed, 5/27/09, Timothy or Stephen Gallagher <spqr753@msn. com> wrote:

> From: Timothy or Stephen Gallagher <spqr753@msn. com>
> Subject: [Nova-Roma] Our Fourm
> To: "Nova-Roma" <nova-roma@yahoogrou ps.com>
> Date: Wednesday, May 27, 2009, 8:51 PM
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Salvete
>
> From time to time there have been calls to move the
> discussion of law or politics to another list. It was a
> stupid idea then and it remains a stupid idea now. It would
> also be a stupid idea not to talk about other things as
> well.
>
> This is the forum of Nova Roma. Get engaged in the
> conversations you like,ignore the ones you don't and for
> Pete's sake or Titus's sake take the time to start
> one on a topic you do care about.
>
> 2000 years ago Titus, Felix and hundreds of other Romans
> simply waked into the forum and what do you know, they met
> other Romans and conversations started. The talked about the
> weather, the newest horse in the Circus. Who was sleeping
> with whom. They talked about the price of candles and
> sandals.
>
>
> The discussed the on going war in__________ ________( fill
> in the blank). The asked each other about their kids and
> their kids kids. The wanted the skinny on the new neighbors
> and on why so and so left town so quickly.
>
> The talked politics, religion, food, the price of slaves,
> the cost of a decent meal out, and the rise in rents.
>
> Everyday or almost every day two Nova Roman have posted ,
> over the years, a daily digest for the enlightenment of all
> of us. In all of that time how many of those posts have led
> to a conversation or even a question. Very few it would
> seem.
>
> In stead of Xitching   We could discuss:
>
> Roman Summer camps ( ours)
> The two pending Conventus
> The best Roman recipe for chicken
> Should Nova Roma offer its own wine for sale?
> Any of the 210 reasons given for the fall of Rome.
> We could ask, Why did Rome last as long as it did?
> Steve Saylor and historic Roman fiction.
> Religion
>
> How can Nova Roma raise a million dollars?
> Roman pluming
> Roman city planning
> Rome's apparent lack of scientific or geographic
> interest
> The Nova Roman tax system and the need to increase the
> annual tax amount.
> Roman ship building
> Nova Roma laws
> How to edit the Wiki.
> How to upload photos to the Wiki.
> Coke or Pepsi?
> Medium rare or medium well? 
>
>
> For Titus's sake pick something and start a
> conversation.
>
> Valete
>
> Paulinus 
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>




No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 8.5.339 / Virus Database: 270.12.43/2138 - Release Date: 05/27/09 18:21:00

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66172 From: Robert Levee Date: 2009-05-27
Subject: Conversation!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66173 From: Robert Levee Date: 2009-05-27
Subject: Conversation!
Salve et salvete,

I will re-join the conversation as soon as I can I am having difficulty loading my mail.

Vale et valete
Ap.Galerius Aurelianus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66174 From: Robin Marquardt Date: 2009-05-27
Subject: Re: Rosetta Stone Latin
Salve V. Rutilia,
I got the Rosetta Stone language program in Italian. Considering, like anything else you got to put in time. Most important is to have someone who shares the passion you can practice phrases. Also, RS is a bit costly, $300 to $400 but worth it, if you use it. The more you use it the less each session costs.
T. Marci Quadra


From: enodia2002 <walkyr@...>
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, May 27, 2009 4:07:21 AM
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Rosetta Stone Latin

Salvete, quirites!

Has anyone used or reviewed the Rosetta Stone Latin program? I have a gift certificate and am considering it.

Thanks,

V Rutilia


Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66175 From: C. Maria Caeca Date: 2009-05-27
Subject: private labeled products random thoughts
Salvete omnes,

Our discussion of wine got me to thinking. Using companies that produce and
private label items makes excellent sense, especially when those products
involve food items. I know a little (a very little) about food preparation
for sale, and the hoops one must jump through are *truly* awesome, and for
good reason.

However. It occurred to me that, if we could find the right producers, and
find someone who could create or has available the right packaging ... what
about honey and, say olives, in amphorae? Not antique ones, of course, but
made to *look* like the real thing, with our label attached. I bet we could
come up with other goodies, too, and, whatever the economy does, people like
to eat. Thoughts? Suggestions? Do we want to pursue this in some form,
and if so, how? From my reading of our forum, I know that there are several
Cives who can lay claim to an extremely high level of business acumen and
competency, so ... ?

Valete Bene,
C. Maria Caeca
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66176 From: Kirsteen Wright Date: 2009-05-28
Subject: Re: Our Fourm
On 5/28/09, Maior <rory12001@...> wrote:
  there are sub lists for people with a passion for a particular topic/

Not every wants to talk about the cultus deorum 24/7  or is keen to discuss minutiae.

But we are basically sick to death of endless posts on NR and Maine corporate law,....

That's why we have a delete button :-)  I, too have always compared the ML to the Forum. You take a stroll through it. You see people you recognise, some you like listening to what they say, so you gravitate towards them and listen, maybe adding your own comments. You hear several conversations going on and join in the ones that interest you. You see old so-and-so and think 'Ye gods, he never stops droning about his gout, lawsuits, slaves, whatever' and so you hurriedly avoid him and seek out someone more pleasant.

If you walked through the forum you would not be interested in every conversation going on. In any gathering of people today you will not be interested in every conversation going on. Exactly the same in the ML and the delete button is the virtual equivalent of moving along quickly and at least it's a lot easier to do virtually :-)

Flavia Lucilla Merula


Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66177 From: MCC Date: 2009-05-28
Subject: COMITIA CENTURIATA: Election for Censor
Salvete

Memento:

- from 27 to 29 May only are allowed to vote the members of the First Class centuries (Centuries I to XV)
-from 30 May to 3 June are allowed to vote the members of all centuries.

Please check your own centuria in your profile in the Album Civium (http://www.novaroma.org/civitas/album)

Valete

M. Curiatius Complutensis
Consul
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66178 From: Timothy or Stephen Gallagher Date: 2009-05-28
Subject: Re: private labeled products random thoughts
Salvete
 
Yes  Yes  
 
honey and, say olives, in amphorae

dates, pine nuts, NR spices, NR Cookbook ,vinegar, mustard, and liquamen
 
 Vale
 
Paulinus



To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
From: shoshanahathaway@...
Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 23:24:28 -0400
Subject: [Nova-Roma] private labeled products random thoughts




Salvete omnes,

Our discussion of wine got me to thinking. Using companies that produce and
private label items makes excellent sense, especially when those products
involve food items. I know a little (a very little) about food preparation
for sale, and the hoops one must jump through are *truly* awesome, and for
good reason.

However. It occurred to me that, if we could find the right producers, and
find someone who could create or has available the right packaging ... what
about honey and, say olives, in amphorae? Not antique ones, of course, but
made to *look* like the real thing, with our label attached. I bet we could
come up with other goodies, too, and, whatever the economy does, people like
to eat. Thoughts? Suggestions? Do we want to pursue this in some form,
and if so, how? From my reading of our forum, I know that there are several
Cives who can lay claim to an extremely high level of business acumen and
competency, so ... ?

Valete Bene,
C. Maria Caeca


Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66179 From: Lucius Coruncanius Cato Date: 2009-05-28
Subject: Re: Conversation!
Salve,

Blank message...

Di vos incolumem custodiant.

--
L. Coruncanius Cato
Aedilis Curulis
Scriba Consulis Hispaniae

--- El jue, 28/5/09, Robert Levee <galerius_of_rome@...> escribió:

De: Robert Levee <galerius_of_rome@...>
Asunto: [Nova-Roma] Conversation!
Para: nova-roma@yahoogroups.com
Fecha: jueves, 28 mayo, 2009 4:09




Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66180 From: Chantal Gaudiano Date: 2009-05-28
Subject: C. Centuriata Election: Phase 1 Results
P. Corva Gaudialis diribitrix omnibus s.p.d.
 
These are the results of the votes cast in the Century Praerogative (Century 14) in the current election.
 
Please note that these are preliminary results, only.  Some cives in Century 14 have not yet voted, so the final results for this century might change before the end of the election.
 
The results are as follows:
 
CENTURIA PRAEROGATIVA VOTES:
Censor: K. Fabius Buteo Modianus
Lex Curiatia Iulia de institutis publicis religiosis: Yes
Lex Curiatia Iulia de ratione comitiorum centuriatorum: NO
Lex Curiatia Iulia de tributo virginum Vestalium: NO
 
A tie occurred in the vote for the Lex Curiata Iulia de tributo virginum Vestalium, which was settled by lot.
 
Currently, members of the First Class may vote.  This includes citizens in centuries 1-14. 
 
Valete omnes, in pace Deorum.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66181 From: marcushoratius Date: 2009-05-28
Subject: Re: A dream come true
M. Moravius Horatianus Pontifex Maximus: C. Equitio Catoni candidato s. p. d.

The very fact that you have to make such a public statement is very telling.

Did not this god for whom you hold private teach: Ego de lego 'ymin ME OMOSAI'OLOS? Or if you haven't read his words in Greek, "But I say unto you: DO NOT SWEAR AT ALL, not by heaven because it is God's throne, nor by earth for it is the footstool of His feet, nor by Jerusalem because it is the city of the great king, nor by your own head must you swear because you are unable to turn one hair white or black. Just let your word yes mean yes, your no, no; for what is in excess of these is from the wicked one." Matthew 5:34-37

Thus it appears to me that you are either ignorant of your own religion or that you do not abide with the very words of your god. Swearing by him who told you never to do so is thereby a false promise.

As for you swearing by the Di immortales, since you pay Them no cultus, why should I think any oath you swear by Them holds any meaning to you. All I can go on is your past performance when you swore by them on this list after taking earlier offices, and I am not impressed by your performance. Invoking the Gods falsely is a crime against the Gods.

Hollow words and false promises may make a candidate, Cato, but I look for a magistrate who has a proven record of performing his duties.

This is why Modianus is the only worthy candidate in this election. And why I support Modianus to be our next Censor.


--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Gaius Equitius Cato" <mlcinnyc@...> wrote:
>
> Cato Galerio Aureliano pontifice omnibusque in foro SPD
>
> Salve et salvete.
>
> I hereby swear by that God for Whom I hold place in my private cultus and by the Gods upon Whom the Respublica relies for its well-being that if I am elected censor I will not resign, but will fulfill its obligations.
>
> Vale et valete.
>
> Cato
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66182 From: aerdensrw Date: 2009-05-28
Subject: Invalid Votes from Phase 1
P. Corva Gaudialis diribitrix omnibus s.p.d.

The following ballots were cast too early, when only cives in Century 14 could vote.

If your ballot number matches any of the numbers below, please revote at the correct time. Currently, only cives in centuries 1-14 may vote.

7003 7004 7005 7006
7006 7008 7009
7010

Valete in pace Deorum.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66183 From: Robert Levee Date: 2009-05-28
Subject: Re: Conversation!
Salve,
Yes as I mentioned in my next post, I was having problems with my computer.My browser went screwy and I changed to another browser and corrected the problem.Thank you.

Vale,
Aurelianus

--- On Thu, 5/28/09, Lucius Coruncanius Cato <l.coruncanius_cato@...> wrote:

> From: Lucius Coruncanius Cato <l.coruncanius_cato@...>
> Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Conversation!
> To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> Date: Thursday, May 28, 2009, 6:37 AM
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Salve,
>
> Blank message...
>
> Di vos incolumem custodiant.
>
>
>
> --
>
> L. Coruncanius Cato
>
> Aedilis Curulis
>
> Scriba Consulis Hispaniae
>
> --- El jue, 28/5/09, Robert Levee <galerius_of_
> rome@yahoo. com> escribió:
>
> De: Robert Levee <galerius_of_ rome@yahoo. com>
> Asunto: [Nova-Roma] Conversation!
> Para: nova-roma@yahoogrou ps.com
> Fecha: jueves, 28 mayo, 2009 4:09
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66184 From: Diana Octavia Aventina Date: 2009-05-28
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Âñïîìèíàþù óïàäåííîå
<Ñåãîäíÿ â Ñîåäèíåííûå Øòàòû ìû óäîñòîèì è âñïîìèíàåì âñå èç íàøèõ âîèñê ñòðàí êîòîðûå ïîæåðòâîâàëè èõ æèçíè äëÿ èõ ñòðàíû. ß æåëàþ <ðàñøèðèòü íàøè ìûñëè ê âñåì òåì êîòîðûõ ïîòåðÿéòå èõ æèçíè äëÿ è óïàäèòå äëÿ Sarmatia òàêæå. Ìàé èõ ïîääà÷è íå íàõîäèòüñÿ â òùåòíîì.

I agree! That's the most sensible idea I've heard in a long time.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66185 From: David Kling Date: 2009-05-28
Subject: Re: A dream come true
Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus M. Moravio Horatiano salutem dicit

Thank you for your support.  It is much appreciated.

Vale;

Modianus

On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 8:58 AM, marcushoratius <MHoratius@...> wrote:


M. Moravius Horatianus Pontifex Maximus: C. Equitio Catoni candidato s. p. d.

...

This is why Modianus is the only worthy candidate in this election. And why I support Modianus to be our next Censor. 




Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66186 From: Ugo Coppola Date: 2009-05-28
Subject: Re: Invalid Votes from Phase 1
P. Annæus Constasntinus Placidus P. Corvæ s.d.

P. Corva Gaudialis diribitrix omnibus s.p.d.

The following ballots were cast too early, when only cives in Century 14 could vote.

If your ballot number matches any of the numbers below, please revote at the correct time. Currently, only cives in centuries 1-14 may vote.

7003 7004 7005 7006
7006 7008 7009
7010
















I'm very sorry about this - #7004 is mine. Apparently I misunderstood the directions when I voted, on Monday morning - I thought that everyone up to 14 could vote, not only the people in Century 14 (I'm in 6).
However, I voted again one minute ago and I got #7034. I hope this time it's valid. :-)

Bene vale,
P. Ann. Con. Placidus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66187 From: Robert Levee Date: 2009-05-28
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Âñïîìèíàþù óïàäåííîå
Ah the joys of ethnocentricity.


--- On Thu, 5/28/09, Diana Octavia Aventina <roman.babe@...> wrote:

> From: Diana Octavia Aventina <roman.babe@...>
> Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Âñïîìèíàþù óïàäåííîå
> To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> Date: Thursday, May 28, 2009, 9:34 AM
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> <Ñåãîäíÿ â Ñîåäèíåííûå Øòàòû
> ìû óäîñòîèì è âñïîìèíàåì âñå èç
> íàøèõ âîèñê ñòðàí êîòîðûå
> ïîæåðòâîâàëè èõ æèçíè äëÿ èõ
> ñòðàíû. ß æåëàþ <ðàñøèðèòü íàøè
> ìûñëè ê âñåì òåì êîòîðûõ
> ïîòåðÿéòå èõ æèçíè äëÿ è óïàäèòå
> äëÿ Sarmatia òàêæå. Ìàé èõ ïîääà÷è íå
> íàõîäèòüñÿ â òùåòíîì.
>
>
>
> I agree! That's the most sensible idea I've heard
> in a long time.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66188 From: q_caelia_laeta Date: 2009-05-28
Subject: Conversation: Conventus!
Q. Caelia Laeta, with emphasis on the Laeta, omnibus SPD.


Indeed, conventus are afoot (it's 4th declension, right?) and the aedilician cohors is busy plotting. Despite my despotic urges to arrange the North American conventus activity schedule as I see fit, it seems more prudent to actually ask the people what they'd like to do, if only so I can pretend you all had a say in it. Bread and circuses, amici, bread and circuses.

We can do bread, actually, although a circus might be a bit more difficult. Would you like a circus? How about a Roman dinner? An academic talk on ancient Roman sumptuary laws? A 'make your own tunic' workshop, perhaps prior to a religious ritual, so we can all look the part?

Talk, cives, please talk! Tell the cohors what you'd like, or we'll give you what WE want. Do you really want to take that chance?
(Hint: pedicures at 10, gossip and massages til two, then tea and gin til someone gets inappropriate.)


Bene valete!