Selected messages in Nova-Roma group. Jun 1-8, 2009

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66313 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2009-06-01
Subject: Re: A question of scholarship
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66314 From: gualterus_graecus Date: 2009-06-01
Subject: Re: A question of scholarship
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66315 From: M. Lucretius Agricola Date: 2009-06-01
Subject: Re: A question of scholarship
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66316 From: M. Lucretius Agricola Date: 2009-06-01
Subject: Re: A question of scholarship
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66317 From: David Kling Date: 2009-06-01
Subject: Re: A question of scholarship
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66318 From: Cn. Cornelius Lentulus Date: 2009-06-01
Subject: OATH OF OFFICE
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66319 From: marcushoratius Date: 2009-06-01
Subject: KALEDAE IUNIAE: Carna, Juno Regina, Juno Moneta, Mars, Mars Ultor, T
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66320 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2009-06-01
Subject: Re: A question of scholarship
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66321 From: Gaius Petronius Dexter Date: 2009-06-01
Subject: Re: KALEDAE IUNIAE: Carna, Juno Regina, Juno Moneta, Mars, Mars Ulto
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66322 From: Lucius Cornelius Cicero Date: 2009-06-01
Subject: Re: A question of scholarship
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66323 From: marcushoratius Date: 2009-06-01
Subject: Re: Question for the P.M.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66324 From: David Kling Date: 2009-06-01
Subject: Re: A question of scholarship
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66325 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2009-06-01
Subject: Re: Question for the P.M.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66326 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2009-06-01
Subject: Re: A question of scholarship
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66327 From: Maior Date: 2009-06-01
Subject: Re: Question for the P.M.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66328 From: enodia2002 Date: 2009-06-01
Subject: Re: A question of scholarship
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66329 From: PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@aol.com Date: 2009-06-01
Subject: Re: Conversation: Conventus!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66330 From: David Kling Date: 2009-06-01
Subject: Re: Question for the P.M.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66331 From: PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@aol.com Date: 2009-06-01
Subject: Re: Around and around we go...
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66332 From: PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@aol.com Date: 2009-06-01
Subject: Re: Around and around we go...
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66333 From: PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@aol.com Date: 2009-06-01
Subject: Re: Intelligent debate (was Vote)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66334 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2009-06-01
Subject: Re: Intelligent debate (was Vote)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66335 From: C. Maria Caeca Date: 2009-06-01
Subject: Re: A question of scholarship
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66336 From: livia_plauta Date: 2009-06-01
Subject: Fava beans and death (Was:Re: KALEDAE IUNIAE ...)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66337 From: C. Maria Caeca Date: 2009-06-01
Subject: Re: Fava beans and death (Was:Re: KALEDAE IUNIAE ...)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66338 From: Maior Date: 2009-06-01
Subject: Fava beans and death (Was:Re: KALEDAE IUNIAE ...)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66339 From: L Julia Aquila Date: 2009-06-01
Subject: Fava beans and death (Was:Re: KALEDAE IUNIAE ...)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66340 From: livia_plauta Date: 2009-06-01
Subject: Fava beans and death (Was:Re: KALEDAE IUNIAE ...)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66341 From: livia_plauta Date: 2009-06-01
Subject: Fava beans and death (Was:Re: KALEDAE IUNIAE ...)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66342 From: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com Date: 2009-06-01
Subject: Posting rules in this Forum, 6/1/2009, 11:45 pm
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66343 From: Maior Date: 2009-06-01
Subject: Fava beans and death (Was:Re: KALEDAE IUNIAE ...)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66344 From: marcushoratius Date: 2009-06-02
Subject: a. d. IV Nonas Iunias: Ludi Saeculares day two
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66345 From: marcushoratius Date: 2009-06-02
Subject: Re: KALEDAE IUNIAE: Carna, Juno Regina, Juno Moneta, Mars, Mars Ulto
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66346 From: marcushoratius Date: 2009-06-02
Subject: Fava beans and death (Was:Re: KALEDAE IUNIAE ...)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66347 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2009-06-02
Subject: Fava beans and death (Was:Re: KALEDAE IUNIAE ...)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66348 From: Lucius Coruncanius Cato Date: 2009-06-02
Subject: Re: KALEDAE IUNIAE: Carna, Juno Regina, Juno Moneta, Mars, Mars Ulto
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66349 From: livia_plauta Date: 2009-06-02
Subject: Fava beans and death (Was:Re: KALEDAE IUNIAE ...)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66350 From: kzaikov Date: 2009-06-02
Subject: In attention of all nova romans from Bulgaria
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66351 From: livia_plauta Date: 2009-06-02
Subject: Fava beans and death (Was:Re: KALEDAE IUNIAE ...)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66352 From: Maior Date: 2009-06-02
Subject: Fava beans and death (Was:Re: KALEDAE IUNIAE ...)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66353 From: M.C.C. Date: 2009-06-03
Subject: END OF VOTATION TIME
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66354 From: Gaius Petronius Dexter Date: 2009-06-03
Subject: Re: KALEDAE IUNIAE: Carna, Juno Regina, Juno Moneta, Mars, Mars Ulto
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66355 From: Gaius Petronius Dexter Date: 2009-06-03
Subject: Re: KALEDAE IUNIAE: Carna, Juno Regina, Juno Moneta, Mars, Mars Ulto
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66356 From: marcushoratius Date: 2009-06-03
Subject: a. d. III Nonas Iunias: Bellona; Ludi Saeculares day three
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66357 From: Maior Date: 2009-06-03
Subject: Re: KALEDAE IUNIAE: Carna, Juno Regina, Juno Moneta, Mars, Mars Ulto
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66358 From: marcushoratius Date: 2009-06-04
Subject: Pridie Nonas Iunias: Hercules; Ludi Saeculares day four
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66359 From: Kirsteen Wright Date: 2009-06-04
Subject: The 2,000-year-old gladiator's helmet discovered in Pompeii's ruins
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66360 From: Chantal Gaudiano Date: 2009-06-04
Subject: Re: 2000 year-old gladiator helmet from Pompee
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66361 From: David .C Date: 2009-06-04
Subject: Re: The 2,000-year-old gladiator's helmet discovered in Pompeii's ru
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66362 From: marcushoratius Date: 2009-06-05
Subject: NONAE IUNIAE: Dius Fidius
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66363 From: marcushoratius Date: 2009-06-05
Subject: The Comitia Curiata is Called to Assemble
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66364 From: M.C.C. Date: 2009-06-05
Subject: [Fwd: Report on election results in the Comitia Centuriata.]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66365 From: Titus Flavius Aquila Date: 2009-06-05
Subject: AW: [Nova-Roma] [Fwd: Report on election results in the Comitia Cent
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66366 From: Timothy or Stephen Gallagher Date: 2009-06-05
Subject: Commodum ex iniuria sua nemo habere debet
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66367 From: Matt Hucke Date: 2009-06-05
Subject: Re: Commodum ex iniuria sua nemo habere debet
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66368 From: David Kling Date: 2009-06-05
Subject: Oath of Office - Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66369 From: Titus Flavius Aquila Date: 2009-06-05
Subject: AW: [Nova-Roma] Commodum ex iniuria sua nemo habere debet
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66370 From: David Kling Date: 2009-06-05
Subject: Re: Commodum ex iniuria sua nemo habere debet
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66371 From: Timothy or Stephen Gallagher Date: 2009-06-05
Subject: Re: Commodum ex iniuria sua nemo habere debet
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66372 From: Matt Hucke Date: 2009-06-05
Subject: Re: Commodum ex iniuria sua nemo habere debet
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66374 From: Q. Valerius Poplicola Date: 2009-06-05
Subject: Re: Commodum ex iniuria sua nemo habere debet
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66376 From: Maior Date: 2009-06-05
Subject: Re: Commodum ex iniuria sua nemo habere debet
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66377 From: David Kling Date: 2009-06-05
Subject: Re: Commodum ex iniuria sua nemo habere debet
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66378 From: Lucius Cornelius Cicero Date: 2009-06-05
Subject: Re: Commodum ex iniuria sua nemo habere debet
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66379 From: Maior Date: 2009-06-05
Subject: Re: Commodum ex iniuria sua nemo habere debet
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66380 From: Matt Hucke Date: 2009-06-05
Subject: Re: Commodum ex iniuria sua nemo habere debet
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66381 From: Lucius Coruncanius Cato Date: 2009-06-05
Subject: Re: Commodum ex iniuria sua nemo habere debet
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66382 From: Timothy or Stephen Gallagher Date: 2009-06-05
Subject: Marx Rules!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66383 From: geranioj@aol.com Date: 2009-06-05
Subject: Re: Commodum ex iniuria sua nemo habere debet
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66384 From: Publius Ullerius Stephanus Venator Date: 2009-06-05
Subject: Venator - quick note - election just past
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66385 From: C. Maria Caeca Date: 2009-06-05
Subject: Re: Venator - quick note - election just past
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66386 From: marcushoratius Date: 2009-06-06
Subject: a. d. VIII Eidus Iuniae: Ludi Capitolini
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66387 From: marcushoratius Date: 2009-06-06
Subject: Re: Commodum ex iniuria sua nemo habere debet
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66388 From: marcushoratius Date: 2009-06-06
Subject: Sacrum Iunonis Covellae
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66389 From: Titus Flavius Aquila Date: 2009-06-06
Subject: AW: [Nova-Roma] Re: Commodum ex iniuria sua nemo habere debet
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66390 From: Titus Flavius Aquila Date: 2009-06-06
Subject: AW: [Nova-Roma] Venator - quick note - election just past
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66391 From: Gnaeus Iulius Caesar Date: 2009-06-06
Subject: Re: Commodum ex iniuria sua nemo habere debet
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66392 From: deciusiunius Date: 2009-06-06
Subject: Re: Commodum ex iniuria sua nemo habere debet
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66393 From: Gnaeus Iulius Caesar Date: 2009-06-06
Subject: Request for Tribuncian intercessio
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66394 From: Titus Iulius Sabinus Date: 2009-06-06
Subject: Re: Commodum ex iniuria sua nemo habere debet
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66395 From: David Kling Date: 2009-06-06
Subject: Re: Request for Tribuncian intercessio
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66396 From: Gnaeus Iulius Caesar Date: 2009-06-06
Subject: Re: Request for Tribuncian intercessio
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66397 From: David Kling Date: 2009-06-06
Subject: Re: Request for Tribuncian intercessio
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66398 From: Gaius Petronius Dexter Date: 2009-06-06
Subject: Re: Request for Tribunician intercessio
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66399 From: Steve Moore Date: 2009-06-06
Subject: Petition to the Tribunes
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66400 From: Gnaeus Iulius Caesar Date: 2009-06-06
Subject: Re: Request for Tribunician intercessio
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66401 From: David Kling Date: 2009-06-06
Subject: Re: Petition to the Tribunes
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66402 From: Gnaeus Iulius Caesar Date: 2009-06-06
Subject: Re: Petition to the Tribunes
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66403 From: Maior Date: 2009-06-06
Subject: Reminder monday VI Id. Iun: Mens Bona
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66404 From: Cn. Cornelius Lentulus Date: 2009-06-06
Subject: R: [Nova-Roma] Re: Commodum ex iniuria sua nemo habere debet
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66405 From: Steve Moore Date: 2009-06-06
Subject: Re: Commodum ex iniuria sua nemo habere debet
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66406 From: Q. Valerius Poplicola Date: 2009-06-06
Subject: Re: Commodum ex iniuria sua nemo habere debet
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66407 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2009-06-06
Subject: Re: Request for Tribunician intercessio
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66409 From: Gnaeus Iulius Caesar Date: 2009-06-06
Subject: Re: Request for Tribunician intercessio
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66410 From: Timothy or Stephen Gallagher Date: 2009-06-06
Subject: Senate appointments
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66411 From: Maior Date: 2009-06-06
Subject: Apollonius of Tyana
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66412 From: gualterus_graecus Date: 2009-06-07
Subject: Re: Apollonius of Tyana
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66413 From: Maior Date: 2009-06-07
Subject: Re: Apollonius of Tyana
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66414 From: gualterus_graecus Date: 2009-06-07
Subject: Re: Apollonius of Tyana
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66415 From: Maior Date: 2009-06-07
Subject: Re: Apollonius of Tyana
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66416 From: gualterus_graecus Date: 2009-06-07
Subject: Re: Apollonius of Tyana
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66417 From: Cn. Cornelius Lentulus Date: 2009-06-07
Subject: R: [Nova-Roma] Re: Commodum ex iniuria sua nemo habere debet
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66418 From: Q. Valerius Poplicola Date: 2009-06-07
Subject: R: [Nova-Roma] Re: Commodum ex iniuria sua nemo habere debet
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66419 From: Kirsteen Wright Date: 2009-06-07
Subject: Classical education
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66420 From: marcushoratius Date: 2009-06-07
Subject: a. d. VII Eidus Iuniae: Temple of Vesta is Opened
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66421 From: canadaoccidentalis@yahoo.ca Date: 2009-06-07
Subject: Intercessio
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66422 From: violetphearsen@yahoo.com Date: 2009-06-07
Subject: Re: kitten report?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66423 From: Steve Moore Date: 2009-06-07
Subject: Re: Commodum ex iniuria sua nemo habere debet
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66424 From: Matt Hucke Date: 2009-06-07
Subject: Re: Intercessio
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66425 From: Titus Iulius Sabinus Date: 2009-06-07
Subject: Re: Intercessio
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66426 From: Publius Ullerius Stephanus Venator Date: 2009-06-07
Subject: Re: Intercessio
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66427 From: Titus Iulius Sabinus Date: 2009-06-07
Subject: Re: to Octavius.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66428 From: Steve Moore Date: 2009-06-07
Subject: Re: Intercessio
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66429 From: Publius Ullerius Stephanus Venator Date: 2009-06-07
Subject: Re: Intercessio
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66430 From: Gnaeus Iulius Caesar Date: 2009-06-07
Subject: Re: Intercessio
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66431 From: Maxima Valeria Messallina Date: 2009-06-07
Subject: Re: Intercessio
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66432 From: violetphearsen@yahoo.com Date: 2009-06-07
Subject: Speaking of Mockingbirds
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66433 From: C. Maria Caeca Date: 2009-06-07
Subject: Re: Speaking of Mockingbirds
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66434 From: C. Maria Caeca Date: 2009-06-07
Subject: Re: kitten report?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66435 From: wuffa2001 Date: 2009-06-07
Subject: Re: kitten report?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66436 From: Maxima Valeria Messallina Date: 2009-06-07
Subject: Re: kitten report?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66437 From: Maxima Valeria Messallina Date: 2009-06-07
Subject: Re: Speaking of Mockingbirds
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66438 From: Diana Octavia Aventina Date: 2009-06-07
Subject: Re: kitten report?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66439 From: Diana Octavia Aventina Date: 2009-06-07
Subject: Following in my Pater's footsteps
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66440 From: aerdensrw Date: 2009-06-07
Subject: Re: Intercessio
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66441 From: Titus Iulius Sabinus Date: 2009-06-07
Subject: Re: Intercessio
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66442 From: David Kling Date: 2009-06-07
Subject: Re: Intercessio
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66443 From: Gaius Petronius Dexter Date: 2009-06-07
Subject: Re: Request for Tribunician intercessio
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66444 From: Gnaeus Iulius Caesar Date: 2009-06-07
Subject: Re: Intercessio
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66445 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2009-06-07
Subject: Re: Request for Tribunician intercessio
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66446 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2009-06-07
Subject: Re: Request for Tribunician intercessio
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66447 From: Gnaeus Iulius Caesar Date: 2009-06-07
Subject: Re: Intercessio
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66448 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2009-06-07
Subject: Re: Intercessio
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66449 From: Charlie Collins Date: 2009-06-07
Subject: The Recent Election and Other Events
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66450 From: C. Maria Caeca Date: 2009-06-07
Subject: thank you!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66451 From: Q. Valerius Poplicola Date: 2009-06-07
Subject: Re: thank you!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66452 From: Gnaeus Iulius Caesar Date: 2009-06-07
Subject: Re: Intercessio
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66453 From: C. Maria Caeca Date: 2009-06-07
Subject: Re: thank you!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66454 From: C. Maria Caeca Date: 2009-06-07
Subject: a little something ...
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66455 From: Q. Caecilius Metellus Date: 2009-06-07
Subject: Re: Intercessio
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66456 From: QFabiusMaxmi@aol.com Date: 2009-06-07
Subject: Re: Intercessio
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66457 From: Titus Iulius Sabinus Date: 2009-06-07
Subject: Re: Intercessio
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66458 From: Q. Valerius Poplicola Date: 2009-06-07
Subject: Re: Intercessio
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66459 From: Gnaeus Iulius Caesar Date: 2009-06-07
Subject: Re: Intercessio
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66460 From: Titus Iulius Sabinus Date: 2009-06-07
Subject: Re: Intercessio
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66461 From: Gnaeus Iulius Caesar Date: 2009-06-07
Subject: Re: Intercessio
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66462 From: Maior Date: 2009-06-07
Subject: Re: Intercessio
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66463 From: Q. Valerius Poplicola Date: 2009-06-07
Subject: Re: Intercessio
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66464 From: Robert Levee Date: 2009-06-07
Subject: Intercessio!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66465 From: M. Lucretius Agricola Date: 2009-06-07
Subject: Re: Intercessio
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66466 From: M•IVL• SEVERVS Date: 2009-06-07
Subject: ELECTIONS, INTERCESSIO AND THE WILL OF THE PEOPLE
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66467 From: M•IVL• SEVERVS Date: 2009-06-07
Subject: ELECCIONES, INTERCESSIO Y LA VOLUNTAD DEL PUEBLO
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66468 From: aerdensrw Date: 2009-06-07
Subject: Re: a little something ...
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66469 From: Q. Valerius Poplicola Date: 2009-06-07
Subject: Re: Intercessio
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66470 From: Maior Date: 2009-06-07
Subject: Re: Apollonius of Tyana
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66471 From: deciusiunius Date: 2009-06-08
Subject: Re: Intercessio
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66472 From: Gnaeus Iulius Caesar Date: 2009-06-08
Subject: Re: Intercessio
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66473 From: Jennifer Harris Date: 2009-06-08
Subject: Re: kitten report?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66474 From: Lucius Coruncanius Cato Date: 2009-06-08
Subject: Re: Intercessio
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66475 From: Lucius Coruncanius Cato Date: 2009-06-08
Subject: Re: Intercessio
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66476 From: QFabiusMaxmi@aol.com Date: 2009-06-08
Subject: Re: Intercessio
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66477 From: Lucius Coruncanius Cato Date: 2009-06-08
Subject: Re: Intercessio
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66478 From: Francesco Valenzano Date: 2009-06-08
Subject: Nova Roma Italia al Festival Occidente - 26-28 giugno 209, Marzabott
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66479 From: marcushoratius Date: 2009-06-08
Subject: a. d. VI Eidus Iuniae: Dedication of the Temple of Mens on the Capit
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66480 From: Rusty Myers Date: 2009-06-08
Subject: Castra Romana 2009, Givhans SC
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66481 From: PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@aol.com Date: 2009-06-08
Subject: Re: Intercessio
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66482 From: PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@aol.com Date: 2009-06-08
Subject: Re: Following in my Pater's footsteps
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66483 From: PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@aol.com Date: 2009-06-08
Subject: Re: Intercessio
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66484 From: livia_plauta Date: 2009-06-08
Subject: Re: Intercessio
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66485 From: PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@aol.com Date: 2009-06-08
Subject: Re: Intercessio!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66486 From: PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@aol.com Date: 2009-06-08
Subject: Re: Intercessio
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66487 From: PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@aol.com Date: 2009-06-08
Subject: Re: Intercessio
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66488 From: PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@aol.com Date: 2009-06-08
Subject: Re: Intercessio - Point of order
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66489 From: PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@aol.com Date: 2009-06-08
Subject: Re: Intercessio - Point of order
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66490 From: M.C.C. Date: 2009-06-08
Subject: Diribitoris Suffecti
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66491 From: Maior Date: 2009-06-08
Subject: Re: Intercessio:



Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66313 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2009-06-01
Subject: Re: A question of scholarship
Cato Agricolae Graecae SPD

Salvete.

True enough, there is a conditional applied and a conditional is hard to argue with.

I take offense at words like "I would have to conclude that the Jesus of the Gospels is pure myth", and "Christianity has become, IMHO, a religion of ignorance" coming from the religious leader of the Respublica's State cultus while at the same time he argues in favor of striking from our Constitution the one phrase that actually shows tolerance towards non-practitioners who want to serve as magistrates or in the Senate.

It's like putting someone who says "I really don't see the purpose of having a dog or a cat as a pet" in charge of making pet adoption rules at a chapter of the ASPCA.

Valete,

Cato
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66314 From: gualterus_graecus Date: 2009-06-01
Subject: Re: A question of scholarship
Salve Agricola,

Yes, point taken on the "if"; however, it seems to me he was reacting to more than a conditional clause; or, at least, more seemed to be at stake. I admit that I didn't read the debate until you started this thread, but looking back at Maior's post, I see a more serious claim than just a generic "if Jesus existed..." statement.

Aside from the parallelomania arguments, Maior asserts that Apollonius of Tyana was certainly a real person. Well, Philostratus' biography of Apollonius is separated by a greater time span than the Gospels are from Jesus (3rd century from 1st century, versus about 50-70 years for the gospels from Jesus); moreover, there actually is an academic debate over whether Apollonius really existed. I recommend the short discussion of the issue (and copious footnotes) in Reimer, _Miracle and Magic: A Study in the Acts of the Apostles and the Life of Apollonius of Tyana_ (JSNTSupp. 235) 19-23, which in general is an excellent monograph.

There are other things I could point to, but I want to keep this post short. Altogether, it seems to me Maior's post made some bold statements that reflected a particular bias that deserved a skeptical response. In this light, I don't think Cato's response was an overreaction. At the same time, since he is party to some strong biases on the subject as well, I can see why his easy dismissal of the "Jesus Myth" position may not be convincing at first blush.

Vale,

Gualterus

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "M. Lucretius Agricola" <marcus.lucretius@...> wrote:
>
> Salve Graece,
>
> I didn't say he was wrong, just not exactly correct, and not to put too fine a point on it, not absolutely correct enough to take issue with someone saying "If...", particularly when the "if" wasn't the main point. The majority in the field may accept something as a given, or at least a working proposition, but that does not exclude doubt or issues of, for example, one man versus several. Looking at the textual issues I tend to see a central figure around which there was a lot of elaboration, but this isn't what I call one of my main concerns, nor is it the point.
>
> When it becomes reasonable to object to an "if" (and I mean in history in general) is an interesting thing, and since there is so much judgment and interpretation (again, in general) there is likely to be a grey area in which people disagree. And then there are hot button issues where the disagreement can be strong. I didn't think the language used to object to Maior's "if" was needed. We of all communities should be used to people saying "if".
>
> vale
>
> Agricola
>
>
>
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "gualterus_graecus" <waltms1@> wrote:
> >
> > Salve,
> >
> > I have to say that Cato is correct. The "Jesus Myth" position is long dead within the field of biblical studies. If you look at the bib list on the page you cited, it contains only one academic journal citation--and that is one outside biblical studies (where are the JBL, JSNT, JSOT, NTS, Biblica etc references?), and numerous books by people not only outside biblical studies (as in, not having a degree in related to the field), but even Earl Doherty, who not only barely has any credentials (merely a BA), but his scholarship is a pitiful wreck. He's somewhat of a joke among academics. The question is not even a "debate" in the field.
> >
> > Vale,
> >
> > Gualterus
> >
> > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "M. Lucretius Agricola" <marcus.lucretius@> wrote:
> > >
> > > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Gaius Equitius Cato" <mlcinnyc@> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Cato Fabio Modiano sal.
> > > >
> > > > Salve!
> > > >
> > > > And your surety would be incorrect. The "Jesus Myth" theory has been put to rest for decades by any serious scholarship.
> > >
> > > Agricola Catoni Omnibusque sal.
> > >
> > > This is not exactly true. A nice summary of the debate, including citations within the last decade, is at religioustolerance.org: http://www.religioustolerance.org/chr_jcno.htm
> > >
> > > Note that all hinges on textual analysis, so while "Almost everyone believes that Jesus walked the land of Palestine in the 1st century CE." we cannot say that this is proved beyond a shadow of a doubt, and alternative interpretations of the texts we have are possible. Therefore the use of the conditional may not be the majority preference, but it is not insupportable.
> > >
> > > vale et valete
> > >
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66315 From: M. Lucretius Agricola Date: 2009-06-01
Subject: Re: A question of scholarship
--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Gaius Equitius Cato" <mlcinnyc@...> wrote:
>
> Cato Agricolae Graecae SPD
>
> Salvete.
>
> True enough, there is a conditional applied and a conditional is hard to argue with.
>


Your message replied to one of Maior's in the thread, and it didn't quote any message at all, so I assumed you were responding to the message that yours followed, and I tried to link them up. I'm sorry if it was something else intended.

Agricola
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66316 From: M. Lucretius Agricola Date: 2009-06-01
Subject: Re: A question of scholarship
Thank you for the thoughtful reply, included below, and especially for the citation to Reimer.

The main thing I would like to get across is that we in Nova Roma live in a world of "if", except of course when we live in a world of faith, which permits no "if". Many of us live in both worlds, at varying times, and we have to, or at least should, navigate the crossing, always being mindful of which world we stand in when we speak. If we always assume good faith in these circumstances, even when it is hard to do so, we will shed more light, less heat and profit ourselves and our community more.

I think the phrase "dog and pony show" was used, and I don't think it is proper to characterize anything that has consumed the hours of so many scholars in this way, regardless of how one feels about it. Still, I think that there is nothing left to say on this point and everyone has made themselves clear. In the end I'm glad that it was the opportunity to start this little discussion, which I hope will not be without value for others in this community.

optime vale

Agricola



--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "gualterus_graecus" <waltms1@...> wrote:
>
> Salve Agricola,
>
> Yes, point taken on the "if"; however, it seems to me he was reacting to more than a conditional clause; or, at least, more seemed to be at stake. I admit that I didn't read the debate until you started this thread, but looking back at Maior's post, I see a more serious claim than just a generic "if Jesus existed..." statement.
>
> Aside from the parallelomania arguments, Maior asserts that Apollonius of Tyana was certainly a real person. Well, Philostratus' biography of Apollonius is separated by a greater time span than the Gospels are from Jesus (3rd century from 1st century, versus about 50-70 years for the gospels from Jesus); moreover, there actually is an academic debate over whether Apollonius really existed. I recommend the short discussion of the issue (and copious footnotes) in Reimer, _Miracle and Magic: A Study in the Acts of the Apostles and the Life of Apollonius of Tyana_ (JSNTSupp. 235) 19-23, which in general is an excellent monograph.
>
> There are other things I could point to, but I want to keep this post short. Altogether, it seems to me Maior's post made some bold statements that reflected a particular bias that deserved a skeptical response. In this light, I don't think Cato's response was an overreaction. At the same time, since he is party to some strong biases on the subject as well, I can see why his easy dismissal of the "Jesus Myth" position may not be convincing at first blush.
>
> Vale,
>
> Gualterus
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66317 From: David Kling Date: 2009-06-01
Subject: Re: A question of scholarship
Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus M. Lucretio Agricolae salutem dicit

The irony here, at least for me, is that when "scholarship" is used against G. Equitius Cato he will dismiss it -- claiming of course that his faith supersedes any scholarship; however, he is then quick to point of "scholars" to laud to add credence to his own position.  Alright... let us dismiss the "Jesus Myth" and rely upon an historical Jesus.  Then let us look at all available scholarship on Christian origins, which "most scholars" will agree is NOT how Cato wants to portray the origin of Christianity.  You cannot have it both ways.  You cannot have scholarship used to dispell one thing and then ignore it when it advises on another.  Ultimately people will believe what they want to believe, and I'm certainly fine with that, but someone truly interested in scholarship will acknowledge the work being done and respect it.

Vale;

Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus

On Sun, May 31, 2009 at 11:30 PM, M. Lucretius Agricola <marcus.lucretius@...> wrote:


Salve Graece,

I didn't say he was wrong, just not exactly correct, and not to put too fine a point on it, not absolutely correct enough to take issue with someone saying "If...", particularly when the "if" wasn't the main point. The majority in the field may accept something as a given, or at least a working proposition, but that does not exclude doubt or issues of, for example, one man versus several. Looking at the textual issues I tend to see a central figure around which there was a lot of elaboration, but this isn't what I call one of my main concerns, nor is it the point.

When it becomes reasonable to object to an "if" (and I mean in history in general) is an interesting thing, and since there is so much judgment and interpretation (again, in general) there is likely to be a grey area in which people disagree. And then there are hot button issues where the disagreement can be strong. I didn't think the language used to object to Maior's "if" was needed. We of all communities should be used to people saying "if".

vale

Agricola




Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66318 From: Cn. Cornelius Lentulus Date: 2009-06-01
Subject: OATH OF OFFICE
CN. LENTVLVS CVSTOS: QVIRITIBVS: SAL.:

Avete, Novi Romani Qurites!

I have waited to this auspiscious day of the Kalends of June to take my oath of office.

I pronounced the oath aloud in three languages:


- LATIN VERSION

Ego, Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus (Attila Gonda), hac re ipsa decus Novae Romae me defensurum, et semper pro populo senatuque Novae Romae acturum esse sollemniter IVRO.

Ego, Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus, officio Custodis Novae Romae accepto, deos deasque Romae in omnibus meae vitae publicae temporibus culturum, et virtutes Romanas publica privataque vita me persecuturum esse IVRO.

Ego, Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus, Religioni Romanae me fauturum et eam defensurum, et numquam contra eius statum publicum me acturum esse, ne quid detrimenti capiat IVRO.

Ego, Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus, officiis muneris Custodis me quam optime functurum esse praeterea IVRO.

Meo civis Novae Romae honore, coram deis deabusque populi Romani, et voluntate favoreque eorum, ego munus Custodis, una cum iuribus, privilegiis, muneribus et officiis comitantibus ACCIPIO.


- ENGLISH VERSION:

I, Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus (Attila Gonda) do hereby solemnly swear to uphold the honor of Nova Roma, and to act always in the best interests of the people and the Senate of Nova Roma.

As a magistrate of Nova Roma, I, Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus swear to honor the Gods and Goddesses of Rome in my public dealings, and to pursue the Roman Virtues in my public and private life.

I, Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus swear to uphold and defend the Religio Romana as the State Religion of Nova Roma and swear never to act in a way that would threaten its status as the State Religion.

I, Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus swear to protect and defend the Constitution of Nova Roma.

I, Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus further swear to fulfill the obligations and responsibilities of the office of Custos to the best of my abilities.

On my honor as a Citizen of Nova Roma, and in the presence of the Gods and Goddesses of the Roman people and by their will and favor, do I accept the position of Custos and all the rights, privileges, obligations, and responsibilities attendant thereto.


- HUNGARIAN VERSION

Én, Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus (Gonda Attila), ezennel ünnepélyesen esküszöm,hogy Nova Roma becsületét megvédelmezem, és mindenkor a szenátus és Nova Roma népének érdekében cselekszem.

Én, Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus, elfogadván hivatalomat esküszöm, hogy Róma isteneit és istennõit minden közéleti tevékenységem során tisztelettel fogom illetni, és követni fogom a római erényeket mind a magán, mind a közösségi életben.

Én, Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus, esküszöm, hogy a Római Vallást óvni és védelmezni fogom, és nyílvánosan sohasem foglalok el vele ellentétes álláspontot, hogy kárt ne szenvedjen.

Én, Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus, esküszöm továbbá, hogy a Custosi hivatallal járó feladataimat a lehetõ legjobb képességeim szerint látom el.

Én, nova római polgárjogomnál fogva a római nép istenei és istennõi elõtt és azok akarata és tetszése szerint a Custosi hivatalt a velejáró összes joggal, kiváltsággal, kötelezettséggel és feladattal együtt elfogadom.




Valete, Novi Romani Quirites!


Cn. Cornelius Lentulus
CVSTOS NOVAE ROMAE
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66319 From: marcushoratius Date: 2009-06-01
Subject: KALEDAE IUNIAE: Carna, Juno Regina, Juno Moneta, Mars, Mars Ultor, T
M. Moravius Piscinus cultoribus Deorum et omnibus salutem plurimam dicit: Di vos semper servent.

Hodie est Kalendae Fabariae; haec dies nefastus est: DIE QUINTI TE KALO, IUNO COVELLA : Iunoni Monetae in arce; Fabarici circenses missus.

Fabariae

The name for today's date, the Kalendae Fabariae, comes not from a festival, but instead from an ancient tradition. On this day one is to eat a dish prepared from bean-meal and bacon fat (Macrobius, Saturnalia 1.12.22 and 31). This meal was dedicated to the Goddess Carna and was intended to preserve one's good health (Pliny H. N. 18.117). As it happens, this was the time of year when beans were harvested in Central Italy (Columella, 11.2.20).

"Prayers are offered to this Goddess, for the good preservation of liver, heart, and the other internal organs of our bodies. Her sacrifices are bean-meal and lard, because this is the best food for the nourishment of the body." ~ Macrobius, Saturnalia 1.12.32


Today celebrates the dedication of five temples at Rome:

AUC 358 / 395 BCE: Temple of Juno Regina, brought from Veii, dedicated on the Aventine Hill.


AUC 365 / 388 BCE: Temple of Mars dedicated in the Campus Martius.

"Father Mars, You who were not at all deaf to my vows, these men, survivors of the battle, dedicate to You the choicest armour of our victory trophies." ~ Silius Italicus Punica 10.553-54

"This same day is a festival of Mars, whose temple is seen from beyond the Portus Capena." ~Ovidius Naso, Fasti 6.191


AUC 409 / 344 BCE: Temple of Juno Moneta dedicated on the Arx.

"The Dictator (L. Furius Camillus) thought it his duty to secure the help of the Gods, and during the actual fighting he vowed a temple to Juno Moneta. On his victorious return to Rome, he resigned his Dictatorship to discharge his vow. The senate ordered two commissioners to be appointed to carry out the construction of that temple in a style commensurate with the greatness of the Roman people, and a site was marked out in the Citadel where the house of M. Manlius Capitolinus had stood." ~ Titus Livius 7.28


AUC 494 / 259 BCE: Temple of the Tempestes dedicated near the porta Capena.

"You too, Tempests, were considered worthy of a shrine, after our fleet was almost sunk in Corsican waters." ~ Ovidius Naso, Fasti 6.193

"Thanks be to Neptunus and the Tempestates, for returning me safe home again, my venture a success!" ~ Plautus, Stichus 402


AUC 733 / 20 BCE: Temple of Mars Ultor dedicated in the Forum Augusti.

"If, Father, my war is authorized by Vesta's priestess, and whenever I prepare to take divine vengeance, Mars, be by my side and satiate cold steel with guilt's blood, and lend Your favour to the better side. If I am victorious for You I'll build a shrine and call You Ultor, Mars the Avenger." ~ Ovid Fasti 5.573-77


AUC 736 / 17 BCE: Ludi Saeculares led by Augustus and Agrippa

Acta Sacrorum Saecularium

A proclamation was sent out asking the populace of Rome to participate. "All Free Men, you are bid to pray and fast. On the Capitolium, before the Temple of Jupiter, and on the Aventine before the temple of Diana (join with) the crowded populace present and for the Gods gather sweet-smelling herbs to offer."

Those who were 25 or older were to convene on the Capitolium. From among those who were younger, two choruses were selected of male and female voices to sing a hymn specially composed for the occasion by Horace. As some rites of the Ludi Saeculares were reserved for women to conduct, a second decree was issued on the Kalendae Fabariae:

"And the edict was issued: The quindecimviri sacris faciundis decree: Since, insofar as it accords with proper custom, and in like manner has been observed in numerous precedents, whenever there has been a rightful cause for public celebration, it has been decided that the mourning of women should be suspended; and since it seems that it is appropriate both to the honor of the gods and to the remembrance of their worship that that should apply to the time of solemn rites and games and that it should be scrupulously observed –therefore we have decided that it is incumbent on us to issue to women a decree by edict, that they should suspend mourning." ~ CIL 6.32323 Lines 110b-14


The Ludi Saeculares began soon after Midnight with a nighttime sacrifice to the Moirai in the Campus Martius

"On the following night, on the Campus Martius, next to the Tiber, [the emperor Caesar Augustus sacrificed] according to the Greek rite [nine female lambs to the divine Moirai (Fates) as whole burnt offering; and by the same rite he sacrificed nine female goats as a whole burnt offerings and spoke the following prayer: "Moirai, as it is prescribed for you in the Sibylline books - and for this reason may good fortune attend the Roman people, the Quirites – let sacrifice be made to you with nine female lambs and nine female goats burnt whole for you. I beg you and pray that you may increase the power and majesty of the Roman people, the Quirites, in war and peace; and that the Latins may always be obedient; and that you may grant eternal safety, victory and health to the Roman people, the Quirites; and that you may protect the Roman people, the Quirites, and the legions of the Roman people, the Quirites; and that you may keep safe and make greater the state of the Roman people, the Quirites, and that you may be favorable and propitious to the Roman people], the Quirites, to the collegium of the quindecimviri, to me, to my house, to my household; and that you may accept this sacrifice of nine female lambs and nine female goats, to be burnt whole for you in sacrifice. For these reasons be honoured with the sacrifice of this female lamb, become favourable and propitious to the Roman people, the Quirites, to the collegium of the quindecimviri, to myself, to my house, to my household.

"When the sacrifice was completed, games were celebrated by night on a stage, without the additional construction of a theatre and without the erection of seating. One hundred and ten matrons, who had been designated by decree of the quindecimviri, held sellisternia with two seats set out for Juno and Diana.

"Then the games were celebrated with plays in Latin on a wooden theatre which had been erected on the Campus Martius next to the Tiber, and in the same manner women who were mistresses of households held sellisternia, and the games which had begun to take place at night were not interrupted." ~ CIL 6.32323 Lines 90-110

"Juno Regina, we, one hundred and ten the mothers of the families of the people of Rome, the Quirites, pray You allow what is now beneficial to the people of Rome, the Quirites, may then be made better, and we brides implore You to aid and increase the sovereign power and majesty of the people of Rome, the Quirites, in war and peace, and always to watch over the fame of the Latins. And may You favor the people of Rome, the Quirites, and the legions of the people of Rome, the Quirites, and preserve the republic of the people of Rome, the Quirites, and may You willingly favor and prosper us, our homes, and our families. This is what the one hundred and ten mothers of the families of the people of Rome, the Quirites, we brides of our families, pray, entreat, and implore You to grant." ~ CIL 6.32329. 10 sqq. Acta Sacrorum Saecularium addition

"On the Kalends of June, on the Capitoline Hill, the emperor Caesar Augustus sacrificed a bull to Jupiter Optimus Maximus burnt whole for him, and in the same place Marcus Agrippa sacrificed a second. They spoke a prayer, as follows: "Jupiter Optimus Maximus, as it is prescribed for you in those books –and for this [reason] may good fortune attend the Roman people, the Quirites – let sacrifice be made to you with this fine bull. I beg you and pray." The rest as above. At the sacred vessel were Caesar, Agrippa, Scaevola, Sentius, Lollius, Asinius Gallus, and Rabilis (all the members of the quindecimviri).

"Then the games were celebrated with plays in Latin on a wooden theatre which had been erected on the Campus Martius next to the Tiber, and in the same manner women who were mistresses of households held sellisternia, and the games which had begun to take place at night were not interrupted.

"Then by night, next to the Tiber, the emperor Caesar Augustus made sacrifice to the divine Ilythiae with nine cakes, nine popana, nine phthoes; he spoke the following prayer: "Ilythia, as it is prescribed for you in those books –and for this reason [may every good fortune attend] the Roman people, the Quirites – let sacrifice be made to you with nine popana, nine cakes, nine phthoes. I beg and pray. The rest as above." ~ CIL 6.32323 Lines 103-110; 115-118

"Ilythia. You who are compassionate towards women, who suffer with great labor pains, their bodies strained in slow birth of the hidden child, gently attend her, Ilythia, and favor my prayers." ~ Ovidius Naso, Amores II.14.19-24


AUC 790 / 37 CE: Emperor Caligula gives the people a congiarium

AUC 820 / 67 CE: Flavius Vespasianus captures Jotapata

AUC 946 / 193 CE: Eemperor Didius Julianus deposed; Septimius Severus recognized as Emperor at Rome


Our thought for today is from Democritus, the Golden Sayings 64:

"The friendship of one wise man is better than that of every fool."
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66320 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2009-06-01
Subject: Re: A question of scholarship
Cato Fabio Modiano Lucretio Agricolae Gualtero Graecae SPD

Salvete.

Agricola struck an important note, and I think that Modianus actually hit on something in the midst of his dismissal. There may very well be two worlds, the world of "if" and the world of "faith". They would apply to all religious systems, as ultimately any religious belief requires faith - if not in the particulars then at least in the generalities.

Cicero didn't have "faith" in the religio per se, yet he saw the ultimate benefit of the religio in regards to the State, so maybe his "faith" consisted of no more than understanding the importance of public order and sense of well-being for the whole Roman people, and that stood in for religious "faith". His world of "if" was that auguries were basically useless, but his world of "faith" saw them as necessary.

As far as my private cultus goes, I certainly acknowledge that historical development occurred in the outward manifestations of the faith. The "origin" of Christianity is Christ. And Christ is God. Not a World Soul or a Luminous Essence or Great Teacher or any one of any number of interesting but ultimately inadequate terms. The faith itself has always been the same because it cannot change. How we *recognized* it or put it into human terms is quite subject to convolution and development as it grew to understand it and its ramifications. So yes, the outward expression of the cultus developed and changed but the core was, and is, the same.

Scholarship and faith are not enemies; if what my private cultus teaches is true they cannot possibly be, since there is a single source for both - as there is a single source for everything, seen and unseen.

Again, what troubles me is not just the ideas, but that they are promulgated by someone who leads the State cult and advocates a stripping of the sole source of definable, qualitative tolerance within the Respublica. It may be redundant to say that the religio is tolerant, just as it may be to say that Christianity teaches love; we know only too well the results that have come from blind acceptance of either of these tenets.

Valete,

Cato
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66321 From: Gaius Petronius Dexter Date: 2009-06-01
Subject: Re: KALEDAE IUNIAE: Carna, Juno Regina, Juno Moneta, Mars, Mars Ulto
C. Petronius M. Moravio Piscino Pontifici Maximo et omnibus s.p.d.,


> Hodie est Kalendae Fabariae;

Et natalis meus.

(...)

> Today celebrates the dedication of five temples at Rome:

> AUC 358 / 395 BCE: Temple of Juno Regina, brought from Veii, dedicated on the Aventine Hill.(...)
> AUC 365 / 388 BCE: Temple of Mars dedicated in the Campus Martius.
(...)
> AUC 409 / 344 BCE: Temple of Juno Moneta dedicated on the Arx.
(...)
> AUC 494 / 259 BCE: Temple of the Tempestes dedicated near the porta Capena.
(...)
> AUC 733 / 20 BCE: Temple of Mars Ultor dedicated in the Forum Augusti.
(...)
--------

> AUC 736 / 17 BCE: Ludi Saeculares led by Augustus and Agrippa.
(...)
> AUC 790 / 37 CE: Emperor Caligula gives the people a congiarium
(...)
> AUC 820 / 67 CE: Flavius Vespasianus captures Jotapata
(...)
> AUC 946 / 193 CE: Eemperor Didius Julianus deposed; Septimius Severus recognized as Emperor at Rome.
(...)

AUC 2712 / 1959 CE: Birth of C. Petronius Dexter. :o)

"Nupta Jovis potuit dubio dare nomina mensi,
Carnae festa deae datur imae cardinis haec lux,
Lustra, a me nato, Phoebus bis quina cucurrit."
CPD

Vale et valete.
C. Petronius Dexter
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66322 From: Lucius Cornelius Cicero Date: 2009-06-01
Subject: Re: A question of scholarship
What I want to know is, what evidence is there that WE exist?

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "M. Lucretius Agricola" <marcus.lucretius@...> wrote:
>
> Thank you for the thoughtful reply, included below, and especially for the citation to Reimer.
>
> The main thing I would like to get across is that we in Nova Roma live in a world of "if", except of course when we live in a world of faith, which permits no "if". Many of us live in both worlds, at varying times, and we have to, or at least should, navigate the crossing, always being mindful of which world we stand in when we speak. If we always assume good faith in these circumstances, even when it is hard to do so, we will shed more light, less heat and profit ourselves and our community more.
>
> I think the phrase "dog and pony show" was used, and I don't think it is proper to characterize anything that has consumed the hours of so many scholars in this way, regardless of how one feels about it. Still, I think that there is nothing left to say on this point and everyone has made themselves clear. In the end I'm glad that it was the opportunity to start this little discussion, which I hope will not be without value for others in this community.
>
> optime vale
>
> Agricola
>
>
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "gualterus_graecus" <waltms1@> wrote:
> >
> > Salve Agricola,
> >
> > Yes, point taken on the "if"; however, it seems to me he was reacting to more than a conditional clause; or, at least, more seemed to be at stake. I admit that I didn't read the debate until you started this thread, but looking back at Maior's post, I see a more serious claim than just a generic "if Jesus existed..." statement.
> >
> > Aside from the parallelomania arguments, Maior asserts that Apollonius of Tyana was certainly a real person. Well, Philostratus' biography of Apollonius is separated by a greater time span than the Gospels are from Jesus (3rd century from 1st century, versus about 50-70 years for the gospels from Jesus); moreover, there actually is an academic debate over whether Apollonius really existed. I recommend the short discussion of the issue (and copious footnotes) in Reimer, _Miracle and Magic: A Study in the Acts of the Apostles and the Life of Apollonius of Tyana_ (JSNTSupp. 235) 19-23, which in general is an excellent monograph.
> >
> > There are other things I could point to, but I want to keep this post short. Altogether, it seems to me Maior's post made some bold statements that reflected a particular bias that deserved a skeptical response. In this light, I don't think Cato's response was an overreaction. At the same time, since he is party to some strong biases on the subject as well, I can see why his easy dismissal of the "Jesus Myth" position may not be convincing at first blush.
> >
> > Vale,
> >
> > Gualterus
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66323 From: marcushoratius Date: 2009-06-01
Subject: Re: Question for the P.M.
M. Moravius Catoni s. p. d.

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Gaius Equitius Cato" <mlcinnyc@...> wrote:
<snipped>
>
> The Pontifex Maximus is painting a very pretty picture that will allow the dissolution of the protection guaranteed by the Constitution to some of its citizens. It may be "redundant to say" many things, but the specific wording of Section VI.A ("Magistrates, Senators, and citizens need not be practitioners of the Religio Romana") is nowhere else echoed in our law.
>

Nothing in the proposed amendment requires magistrates to practice the religio Romana. OTOH elsewhere in the Constitution the rights of Citizens to practice whatever faith they choose, or no faith, is already guaranteed. You seem to be making out some issue that does not exist.

Let us look at the current Constitution VI. A: "The Religio Romana, the worship of the Gods and Goddesses of Rome, shall be the official religion of Nova Roma. All magistrates and Senators, as officers of the State, shall be required to publicly show respect for the Religio Romana and the Gods and Goddesses that made Rome great. Magistrates, Senators, and citizens need not be practitioners of the Religio Romana, but may not engage in any activity that intentionally blasphemes or defames the Gods, the Religio Romana, or its practitioners."

The first sentence of the current Constitution is retained in the proposed amendent to VI.A: "The Religio Romana, defined as the traditional worship of the Gods and Goddesses of Rome, shall be the official religion of Nova Roma."

The second sentence of the current Constitution has: "All magistrates and Senators, as officers of the State, shall be required to publicly show respect for the Religio Romana and the Gods and Goddesses that made Rome great."

All magistrates and Senators? The Constitution does not say "on public Nova Roma lists" alone, but everywhere that could be considered public. So under this provision of the current Constitution, and with the current Decretum Pontificum on blasphemy, I suppose that Senator Sulla could be prosecuted for his outragous and lewd remarks that so insulted the Virgo Maxima that you publicly apologized for just having read them?

I have been told that non-practitioners of the religio Romana took that provision of VI. A as a potential threat to their holding office. Indeed, it seems that former pontifices intended just that when they passed what in my opinion was an illegal decretum on blasphemy. That is, IMHO the Collegium Pontificum may define terms that could be used in our courts, but it has no authority to legislate or instruct Praetores on their duties. It is also my opinion that such past attempts to "regulate" had only led to a weakening of the religio Romana in Nova Roma. Policies of the former Pontifices caused many good cultores Deorum to leave Nova Roma for other organizations. As a result Nova Roma lost its prominence on the Internet as a place to instruct others in the practice of our tradition. Instead, sacerdotes of Nova Roma were going to such websites as SVR's to find information on the religio Romana. Cultores Deorum were organizing and incorporating their own temples, something that Nova Roma should have done long ago. While inside Nova Roma the religio Romana was neglected, its sacerdotes holding offices only in name and absent. In short, the institutions of the religio in Nova Roma were politicized and abused for political purposes by a few individuals who sat as though they were the Taliban.

Well, a change has occurred in the Collegium Pontificum. Let us make it clear that a change has been wrought within the Collegium Pontificum itself, and among the cultores in Nova Roma, by removing any implied threat, real or imagined, that might be in the wording of the Constitution. I have enough faith in the tradition of the religio Romana and in its appeal to some that we do not need to regulate how magistrates and Senators should behave towards our tradition in Nova Roma.

So, we come to the last sentence of the current Constitution:
"Magistrates, Senators, and citizens need not be practitioners of the Religio Romana, but may not engage in any activity that intentionally blasphemes or defames the Gods, the Religio Romana, or its practitioners."

You are concerned about only one part of that one sentence, neglecting the other part, or the history of Nova Roma in how it has been abused for political ends. It causes confusion. It causes misunderstanding. It leads to political issues in Nova Roma where contentions over the religio Romana, such as this one, do not allow the religio Romana to evolve into a living religious tradition. And this is so because the two parts of that sentence are seen by most people as dependent on one another. You cannot remove half of that sentence and retain the other. Nor can you retain only part and neglect the other half. Disagree with my policies as Pontifex Maximus, as surely some have and will in the future, but we have set course in the Collegium Pontificum to "depoliticize" the religious institutions of Nova Roma so as to further the growth and develoment of the religio Romana itself. That future will be squarely placed within our religious institutions themselves, and no longer rely on the Comitia to legislate protections and guarantees for the religio Romana, its practitioners, and its sacerdotes, for all that is covered by this single, simply line: "The Religio Romana, defined as the traditional worship of the Gods and Goddesses of Rome, shall be the official religion of Nova Roma."
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66324 From: David Kling Date: 2009-06-01
Subject: Re: A question of scholarship
Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus Gaio Equitio Catoni salutem dicit

"The faith itself has always been the same because it cannot change."

This statement is the deciding statement in the differences you and I have in regards to religion/faith.  In my understanding of Roman religion this concept of yours does not work; nor does it work with any religious tradition that is syncretistic.  This line of theological thinking is likely very typical for Orthodox and Catholic theology (in their systematic theology), I've been exploring process theology (based on the philosophy of Whitehead) and find it very refreshing -- which is MUCH more compatible with pluralist environments (such as Nova Roma).

The problem with such an "unchanging" theological position is that the Religio becomes "tokenized," because your version of "truth" is without question and not compatible with the theological understanding of someone who embraces the Gods of Rome.  The Religio becomes an "oh that's nice, let's keep it around."  So while you might be advocating that you support the Religio the question is then do you really?  Really support it?  Let us say, for example, that you came into a large sum of money (millions for example) would you use some of that to finance the construction of a temple?  Would you attend offerings/sacrifice in said temple?  Would you sponsor priests to make offerings/sacrifice in said temple?  This is all rhetorical.  It is easy to sit behind a computer and claim "I support the Religio," and then claim that faith cannot change and is absolute.

Let me throw in a hypothetical.  Religion in the ancient world wasn't "evangelical" in the sense that we have it today; however, there are benefits to being a cultor and it is a good religious tradition to embrace.  If the Collegium Pontificum endorsed proselytizing would it still be easy for you to support the Religio?  I'm not saying we should go door to door like the Mormons or Jehovah's Witnesses but actively proclaimed the "Good News" of the Religio Romana in the hopes that people would embrace it; would that be a problem?

Vale;

Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus

On Mon, Jun 1, 2009 at 8:23 AM, Gaius Equitius Cato <mlcinnyc@...> wrote:


Cato Fabio Modiano Lucretio Agricolae Gualtero Graecae SPD

Salvete.

Agricola struck an important note, and I think that Modianus actually hit on something in the midst of his dismissal. There may very well be two worlds, the world of "if" and the world of "faith". They would apply to all religious systems, as ultimately any religious belief requires faith - if not in the particulars then at least in the generalities.

Cicero didn't have "faith" in the religio per se, yet he saw the ultimate benefit of the religio in regards to the State, so maybe his "faith" consisted of no more than understanding the importance of public order and sense of well-being for the whole Roman people, and that stood in for religious "faith". His world of "if" was that auguries were basically useless, but his world of "faith" saw them as necessary.

As far as my private cultus goes, I certainly acknowledge that historical development occurred in the outward manifestations of the faith. The "origin" of Christianity is Christ. And Christ is God. Not a World Soul or a Luminous Essence or Great Teacher or any one of any number of interesting but ultimately inadequate terms. The faith itself has always been the same because it cannot change. How we *recognized* it or put it into human terms is quite subject to convolution and development as it grew to understand it and its ramifications. So yes, the outward expression of the cultus developed and changed but the core was, and is, the same.

Scholarship and faith are not enemies; if what my private cultus teaches is true they cannot possibly be, since there is a single source for both - as there is a single source for everything, seen and unseen.

Again, what troubles me is not just the ideas, but that they are promulgated by someone who leads the State cult and advocates a stripping of the sole source of definable, qualitative tolerance within the Respublica. It may be redundant to say that the religio is tolerant, just as it may be to say that Christianity teaches love; we know only too well the results that have come from blind acceptance of either of these tenets.

Valete,

Cato




Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66325 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2009-06-01
Subject: Re: Question for the P.M.
Cato Moravio Piscino sal.

Salve.

You wrote:

"Nothing in the proposed amendment requires magistrates to practice the religio Romana. OTOH elsewhere in the Constitution the rights of Citizens to practice whatever faith they choose, or no faith, is already guaranteed."

Nothing else in the Constitution guarantees that magistrates must not be practicers of the religio, only this one sentence. Citizens are free to practice privately as always; this is a diversion.

The clause "Magistrates, Senators, and citizens need not be practitioners of the Religio Romana", if removed, *could* allow senators and magistrates to be removed for *not* being practitioners of the religio Romana.

Your argument about Nova Roma's political history is fine, but has nothing to do with preserving the right of a citizen, if elected magistrate or seated in the Senate to *not* practice the religio. And to blame the non-practitioners for your political fears or your feeling that the College of Pontiffs is unable to function or for the state of the religio itself is nonsense.

If by "de-politicizing" you mean "removing difference of opinion", then you are on the right track, but this does *not* serve the religio or the Respublica. Remember that the religio is an inherent part of the State; the citizens - *all* citizens - have a right to determine the way the State acts.

Vale,

Cato
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66326 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2009-06-01
Subject: Re: A question of scholarship
Cato Fabio Modiano sal.

Salve.

You seem to be forgetting that while *my* faith is absolute for *me*, I do not make any attempt to make it absolute for anyone else. You can believe anything you want, you are completely free to explore your own spirituality. I don't mold my beliefs to whatever the current fancy is to make friends and win political power. It is what it is, and you are free to take it or leave it. But don't then turn and tell me what my faith *should* be because *you* reject Orthodoxy - and orthodoxy - simply because you don't like it for itself.

Yes, there were all kinds of odd ideas floating around for a long time; they all failed because they are not orthodoxy. When a sculptor looks at a piece of marble he knows what he sees within it; there's a lot of extraneous material that gets chipped away but the image is still there, no matter how long it takes to reveal it.

You wrote:

"Would you attend offerings/sacrifice in said temple? Would you sponsor priests to make offerings/sacrifice in said temple? This is all rhetorical."

Not so much rhetorical. I have poured out an offering to Apollo in front of Maior, Marinus, and Scholastica, in fact, at dinner.

You also wrote:

"Let me throw in a hypothetical. Religion in the ancient world wasn't "evangelical" in the sense that we have it today; however, there are benefits to being a cultor and it is a good religious tradition to embrace. If the Collegium Pontificum endorsed proselytizing would it still be easy for you to support the Religio? I'm not saying we should go door to door like the Mormons or Jehovah's Witnesses but actively proclaimed the "Good News" of the Religio Romana in the hopes that people would embrace it; would that be a problem?"

Nope. Maybe you *should* be.

Vale,

Cato
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66327 From: Maior Date: 2009-06-01
Subject: Re: Question for the P.M.
Salvete;
this is why we need to all work at being syncretic. If a cultor, anyone wants to put Jesus in his or her lararium and worship him as a man, hero, daemon, god and wants to say so, that is equally as valid in Nova Roma as Cato's views and of equal importance. No one owns the truth - we see many truths and that's a cornerstone of republican roman culture.

It's also fine not to believe Apollonius of Tyana was a historical figure who lived. I believe he did; but everyone, everyone is free to hold and have differing beliefs. That's tolerant broad Roman syncretism.

Finally Cicero, who gets quoted a lot for not 'believing' in the religio, had his deceased daughter Tullia apotheosized: turned into a goddess. He believed that this happened.

so lets go forward together, into a harmonius community. As Piscinus said, and as began with our great PM Fl.Galerius Aurelianus last year, the reformed CP does not boss or threaten anyone.
the essence of Nova Roma is syncretism, tolerance, liberalism, pluralism.
bene valete in pacem deorum
Marca Hortensia Maior


In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Gaius Equitius Cato" <mlcinnyc@...> wrote:
>
> Cato Moravio Piscino sal.
>
> Salve.
>
> You wrote:
>
> "Nothing in the proposed amendment requires magistrates to practice the religio Romana. OTOH elsewhere in the Constitution the rights of Citizens to practice whatever faith they choose, or no faith, is already guaranteed."
>
> Nothing else in the Constitution guarantees that magistrates must not be practicers of the religio, only this one sentence. Citizens are free to practice privately as always; this is a diversion.
>
> The clause "Magistrates, Senators, and citizens need not be practitioners of the Religio Romana", if removed, *could* allow senators and magistrates to be removed for *not* being practitioners of the religio Romana.
>
> Your argument about Nova Roma's political history is fine, but has nothing to do with preserving the right of a citizen, if elected magistrate or seated in the Senate to *not* practice the religio. And to blame the non-practitioners for your political fears or your feeling that the College of Pontiffs is unable to function or for the state of the religio itself is nonsense.
>
> If by "de-politicizing" you mean "removing difference of opinion", then you are on the right track, but this does *not* serve the religio or the Respublica. Remember that the religio is an inherent part of the State; the citizens - *all* citizens - have a right to determine the way the State acts.
>
> Vale,
>
> Cato
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66328 From: enodia2002 Date: 2009-06-01
Subject: Re: A question of scholarship
My cats periodically acknowledge my existence. Therefore, I am.

V


--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Lucius Cornelius Cicero" <Cicero@...> wrote:
>
> What I want to know is, what evidence is there that WE exist?
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "M. Lucretius Agricola" <marcus.lucretius@> wrote:
> >
> > Thank you for the thoughtful reply, included below, and especially for the citation to Reimer.
> >
> > The main thing I would like to get across is that we in Nova Roma live in a world of "if", except of course when we live in a world of faith, which permits no "if". Many of us live in both worlds, at varying times, and we have to, or at least should, navigate the crossing, always being mindful of which world we stand in when we speak. If we always assume good faith in these circumstances, even when it is hard to do so, we will shed more light, less heat and profit ourselves and our community more.
> >
> > I think the phrase "dog and pony show" was used, and I don't think it is proper to characterize anything that has consumed the hours of so many scholars in this way, regardless of how one feels about it. Still, I think that there is nothing left to say on this point and everyone has made themselves clear. In the end I'm glad that it was the opportunity to start this little discussion, which I hope will not be without value for others in this community.
> >
> > optime vale
> >
> > Agricola
> >
> >
> >
> > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "gualterus_graecus" <waltms1@> wrote:
> > >
> > > Salve Agricola,
> > >
> > > Yes, point taken on the "if"; however, it seems to me he was reacting to more than a conditional clause; or, at least, more seemed to be at stake. I admit that I didn't read the debate until you started this thread, but looking back at Maior's post, I see a more serious claim than just a generic "if Jesus existed..." statement.
> > >
> > > Aside from the parallelomania arguments, Maior asserts that Apollonius of Tyana was certainly a real person. Well, Philostratus' biography of Apollonius is separated by a greater time span than the Gospels are from Jesus (3rd century from 1st century, versus about 50-70 years for the gospels from Jesus); moreover, there actually is an academic debate over whether Apollonius really existed. I recommend the short discussion of the issue (and copious footnotes) in Reimer, _Miracle and Magic: A Study in the Acts of the Apostles and the Life of Apollonius of Tyana_ (JSNTSupp. 235) 19-23, which in general is an excellent monograph.
> > >
> > > There are other things I could point to, but I want to keep this post short. Altogether, it seems to me Maior's post made some bold statements that reflected a particular bias that deserved a skeptical response. In this light, I don't think Cato's response was an overreaction. At the same time, since he is party to some strong biases on the subject as well, I can see why his easy dismissal of the "Jesus Myth" position may not be convincing at first blush.
> > >
> > > Vale,
> > >
> > > Gualterus
> > >
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66329 From: PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@aol.com Date: 2009-06-01
Subject: Re: Conversation: Conventus!
There is a covered pavilion on the edge of Centennial Park that is within sight of the Parthenon that would be good for a luncheon or dinner.  However, Nashville is indeed very uncomfortable during the month of August & I cannot understand why the conventus is being scheduled during this time.

Fl. Galerius Aurelianus


-----Original Message-----
From: L Julia Aquila <dis_pensible@...>
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thu, 28 May 2009 11:49 am
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Conversation: Conventus!



Salvete,

>We can do bread, actually, although a circus might be a bit more >difficult. Would you like a circus? How about a Roman dinner? An >academic talk on ancient Roman sumptuary laws? A 'make your own >tunic' workshop, perhaps prior to a religious ritual, so we can all >look the part?
All sounds good to me. The UU complex would be good for this and similar "circuses" have been done there, but also at the Celebration of Cultures in the shadow of the Parthenon is also very doable, depending upon our budget and it would be done in the first week of October.

Valete,
Julia

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com, "q_caelia_laeta" <q.caelia.laeta@ ...> wrote:
>
> Q. Caelia Laeta, with emphasis on the Laeta, omnibus SPD.
>
>
> Indeed, conventus are afoot (it's 4th declension, right?) and the aedilician cohors is busy plotting. Despite my despotic urges to arrange the North American conventus activity schedule as I see fit, it seems more prudent to actually ask the people what they'd like to do, if only so I can pretend you all had a say in it. Bread and circuses, amici, bread and circuses.
>
> We can do bread, actually, although a circus might be a bit more difficult. Would you like a circus? How about a Roman dinner? An academic talk on ancient Roman sumptuary laws? A 'make your own tunic' workshop, perhaps prior to a religious ritual, so we can all look the part?
>
> Talk, cives, please talk! Tell the cohors what you'd like, or we'll give you what WE want. Do you really want to take that chance?
> (Hint: pedicures at 10, gossip and massages til two, then tea and gin til someone gets inappropriate. )
>
>
> Bene valete!
>

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66330 From: David Kling Date: 2009-06-01
Subject: Re: Question for the P.M.
Salve:

Very good way of looking at things; of which I am in full agreement.

Since my father passed away I find myself "praying" to him a lot, and I've offered libations and other offerings to him.  Very Roman.

Vale;

Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus

On Mon, Jun 1, 2009 at 2:02 PM, Maior <rory12001@...> wrote:


Salvete;
this is why we need to all work at being syncretic. If a cultor, anyone wants to put Jesus in his or her lararium and worship him as a man, hero, daemon, god and wants to say so, that is equally as valid in Nova Roma as Cato's views and of equal importance. No one owns the truth - we see many truths and that's a cornerstone of republican roman culture.

It's also fine not to believe Apollonius of Tyana was a historical figure who lived. I believe he did; but everyone, everyone is free to hold and have differing beliefs. That's tolerant broad Roman syncretism.

Finally Cicero, who gets quoted a lot for not 'believing' in the religio, had his deceased daughter Tullia apotheosized: turned into a goddess. He believed that this happened.

so lets go forward together, into a harmonius community. As Piscinus said, and as began with our great PM Fl.Galerius Aurelianus last year, the reformed CP does not boss or threaten anyone.
the essence of Nova Roma is syncretism, tolerance, liberalism, pluralism.
bene valete in pacem deorum
Marca Hortensia Maior




Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66331 From: PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@aol.com Date: 2009-06-01
Subject: Re: Around and around we go...
This entire argument is moot.  I do wish Modianus, Cato, and all the rest would quit assaulting a deceased equine.  If Modianus is elected, I know that he will be carefully watched by his opponents in Nova Roma to see that he keeps to the law; providing that the Tribunes are not called upon to void the election.  If Cato is elected, I know that he will be carefully watchedby his opponents in Nova Roma to see that he keeps to the law.

HOWEVER, THE TRIBUNES will have the call on whether any censorial edictum is legal or illegal.  The only thing that the Tribunes cannot really touch is a censorial nota but those cannot be used against a Tribune or magistrate who holds the imperium.

Let us just get past the election.

Fl. Galerius Aurelianus,
Tribunus Plebis


-----Original Message-----
From: David Kling <tau.athanasios@...>
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Fri, 29 May 2009 11:29 am
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Around and around we go...



Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus Gaio Equitio Catoni salutem dicit

You know full well that as of last December Sulla was NOT a senator.  As such he did not have the rights of a senator.  He had to use extortion to get his senate appointment, and one of those censors who appointed him (ie., Laenas) felt enough guilt over it to leave Nova Roma.  You have allied yourself in deep with Sulla.  So you will keep parading him as the martyr he wants to be.

Vale;

Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus


On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 12:06 PM, Gaius Equitius Cato <mlcinnyc@gmail. com> wrote:


Cato Petronio Dextero Fabio Modianusque SPD

Salvete.

There is no such thing as a senator who cannot vote AND speak. There are others who may observe, and some are granted the privilege of speaking in the Senate. But to try to create any other kind of senator is a violation of the Constitution and the lex Popillia. To obstruct a senator in the exercize of his or her rightful privileges is breaking the law.

You, Modianus, as censor used the power of your office to break the law. You did so knowingly, willingly, and openly. And you abused your authority as censor - you broke the law - simply to "get back" at someone you dislike. The Senate rightfully condemned your action and Sulla was returned.

Petronius Dexter, this is not conjecture or opinion; this is fact, and is recorded as such in the archives of the Senate.

Valete,

Cato



Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66332 From: PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@aol.com Date: 2009-06-01
Subject: Re: Around and around we go...
Fl. Galerius Aurelianus G. Equitio Cato sal.

Actually Sulla had been removed as a Senator during his absence from 2003 to 2008.  He was restored to the Senate by a unilateral action of one Censor.  Technically, Modianus could remove him without consulting with his colleague because our by-laws are a little weak in that direction.. Should Modianus have removed him by a unilateral decision; I would say it was not prudent but I would not say it was strictly illegal.

Sulla was restored by the legal actions of some magistrates who chose what was best for NR rather than risk facing a legal action in the US courts.  However, Lucius Cornelius Sulla Felix committed a greater assault on Nova Roma by threatening outside legal action rather than trying to work out the problem within the organization.

I also don't think much of you for going outside of NR to state or federal authorities rather than trying to work out your problems here.  You called for removal of officers for dereliction of duty when you were unable to prove to me that there was any dereliction.

Modianus is correct in comparing both you and Sulla because both of you cannot use communication and compromise instead of the threat of outside forces.

I would prefer neither Modianus or you as Censor but if it comes down to a choice, I would prefer you to be elected because I would like to avoid the possibility of the Tribunes overturning an election.  However, be assured that should you be elected, your magisterial actions over the next 6 months will be closely monitored by the current Tribunes an I hope by the next five Tribunes as well.

Vale.

-----Original Message-----
From: Gaius Equitius Cato <mlcinnyc@...>
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Fri, 29 May 2009 11:55 am
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Around and around we go...



Cato Fabio Modiano sal.

Salve.

Did Sulla have the right to be in the Senate House? Yes.

Did he have the right to speak? Yes.

Did you unilaterally take that right away from him? Yes.

Did you acknowlege that what you were doing was against the law? Yes.

Did you even go so far as to dare anyone to bring you up on charges of magisterial abuse once you left office? Yes.

Did you threaten to leave Nova Roma if they did? Yes.

Did the Senate condemn your action? Yes.

Was Sulla restored in accordance with the law? Yes.

Once again, you feel the need to equate emotional/personal opinion as a justification for breaking the law. Galerius Paulinus may not particularly *like* Sulla, but he knew - with the Senate - that what you did was a violation of the law that he was bound to uphold. Laenas' leaving is a shame, but whether or not he felt he *liked* restoring Sulla, he knew that he *had* to, according to the law that he was bound to uphold.

You do not seem to have that same respect for the law, as you have shown repeatedly. Obedience to the law is not a matter of deciding if you like the law or not, of how you "feel" about it, it is the foundation of a rational society... one of the hallmarks, as Cicero said, of a respublica.

If you don't like the law, change it. But you do not have the option of ignoring it or breaking it because it makes you "feel" bad.

Vale.

Cato

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66333 From: PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@aol.com Date: 2009-06-01
Subject: Re: Intelligent debate (was Vote)
Hell, if the conventus does occur in Nashville, I will pay for Modiane's room and the first bottle of wine for Sulla, Cato, Modianus, and I.  It would be worth it just to see whether or not the world would implode.

Fl. Galerius Aurelianus


-----Original Message-----
From: David Kling <tau.athanasios@...>
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Fri, 29 May 2009 5:26 pm
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: Intelligent debate (was Vote)



Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus Lucio Cornelio Sullae salutem dicit

When is this conventus and where is it located?  As a full time graduate student my disposable income is extremely limited; although, I would certainly like to attend a US conventus.  I would gladly accept an opportunity to meet and have a conversation in the attempt to find some common ground.

Vale;

Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus

On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 6:19 PM, Robert Woolwine <l_cornelius_ sulla@yahoo. com> wrote:


Ave,

I think many of the challenges that NR sees on a constant basis are the result of cives rarely, if ever, meeting face to face. It's much easier to relate to someone when you have seen their face and heard their voice for yourself.

In the spirit of Concordia and the greater good of Nova Roma I would like to extend an invitation to Modianus to meet at the conventus and go out for a meal and a conversation. At least this will give us a chance to discuss what we have in common, rather than what divides us.

Vale,

Sulla



Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66334 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2009-06-01
Subject: Re: Intelligent debate (was Vote)
Salvete!

I'll buy the second bottle, assuming that we all live that long :)

Valete!

Cato

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@... wrote:
>
> Hell, if the conventus does occur in Nashville, I will pay for Modiane's room and the first bottle of wine for?Sulla, Cato, Modianus, and I.? It would be worth it just to see whether or not the world would implode.
>
> Fl. Galerius Aurelianus
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: David Kling <tau.athanasios@...>
> To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Fri, 29 May 2009 5:26 pm
> Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: Intelligent debate (was Vote)
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus Lucio Cornelio Sullae salutem dicit
>
> When is this conventus and where is it located?? As a full time graduate student my disposable income is extremely limited; although, I would certainly like to attend a US conventus.? I would gladly accept an opportunity to meet and have a conversation in the attempt to find some common ground.
>
> Vale;
>
> Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus
>
>
>
> On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 6:19 PM, Robert Woolwine <l_cornelius_sulla@...> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Ave,
>
> I think many of the challenges that NR sees on a constant basis are the result of cives rarely, if ever, meeting face to face. It's much easier to relate to someone when you have seen their face and heard their voice for yourself.
>
> In the spirit of Concordia and the greater good of Nova Roma I would like to extend an invitation to Modianus to meet at the conventus and go out for a meal and a conversation. At least this will give us a chance to discuss what we have in common, rather than what divides us.
>
> Vale,
>
> Sulla
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66335 From: C. Maria Caeca Date: 2009-06-01
Subject: Re: A question of scholarship
Salve Enodia, et salvete omnes,

Ah but *are* your cats acknowledging your existence, or are they A. Looking
at that little spirit hovering just over your line of sight? B. Paying
extreme attention to the bowl (filled with cat food) you just happen to have
in your hand, or C. are they giving their staff instructions? (any staff
member will do for this, BTW).

Truly, an existential question!

C. Maria Caeca
----- Original Message -----
From: "enodia2002" <walkyr@...>
To: <Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Monday, June 01, 2009 2:17 PM
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: A question of scholarship


> My cats periodically acknowledge my existence. Therefore, I am.
>
> V
>
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Lucius Cornelius Cicero" <Cicero@...>
> wrote:
>>
>> What I want to know is, what evidence is there that WE exist?
>>
>> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "M. Lucretius Agricola"
>> <marcus.lucretius@> wrote:
>> >
>> > Thank you for the thoughtful reply, included below, and especially for
>> > the citation to Reimer.
>> >
>> > The main thing I would like to get across is that we in Nova Roma live
>> > in a world of "if", except of course when we live in a world of faith,
>> > which permits no "if". Many of us live in both worlds, at varying
>> > times, and we have to, or at least should, navigate the crossing,
>> > always being mindful of which world we stand in when we speak. If we
>> > always assume good faith in these circumstances, even when it is hard
>> > to do so, we will shed more light, less heat and profit ourselves and
>> > our community more.
>> >
>> > I think the phrase "dog and pony show" was used, and I don't think it
>> > is proper to characterize anything that has consumed the hours of so
>> > many scholars in this way, regardless of how one feels about it. Still,
>> > I think that there is nothing left to say on this point and everyone
>> > has made themselves clear. In the end I'm glad that it was the
>> > opportunity to start this little discussion, which I hope will not be
>> > without value for others in this community.
>> >
>> > optime vale
>> >
>> > Agricola
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "gualterus_graecus" <waltms1@> wrote:
>> > >
>> > > Salve Agricola,
>> > >
>> > > Yes, point taken on the "if"; however, it seems to me he was reacting
>> > > to more than a conditional clause; or, at least, more seemed to be at
>> > > stake. I admit that I didn't read the debate until you started this
>> > > thread, but looking back at Maior's post, I see a more serious claim
>> > > than just a generic "if Jesus existed..." statement.
>> > >
>> > > Aside from the parallelomania arguments, Maior asserts that
>> > > Apollonius of Tyana was certainly a real person. Well, Philostratus'
>> > > biography of Apollonius is separated by a greater time span than the
>> > > Gospels are from Jesus (3rd century from 1st century, versus about
>> > > 50-70 years for the gospels from Jesus); moreover, there actually is
>> > > an academic debate over whether Apollonius really existed. I
>> > > recommend the short discussion of the issue (and copious footnotes)
>> > > in Reimer, _Miracle and Magic: A Study in the Acts of the Apostles
>> > > and the Life of Apollonius of Tyana_ (JSNTSupp. 235) 19-23, which in
>> > > general is an excellent monograph.
>> > >
>> > > There are other things I could point to, but I want to keep this post
>> > > short. Altogether, it seems to me Maior's post made some bold
>> > > statements that reflected a particular bias that deserved a skeptical
>> > > response. In this light, I don't think Cato's response was an
>> > > overreaction. At the same time, since he is party to some strong
>> > > biases on the subject as well, I can see why his easy dismissal of
>> > > the "Jesus Myth" position may not be convincing at first blush.
>> > >
>> > > Vale,
>> > >
>> > > Gualterus
>> > >
>> >
>>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 8.5.339 / Virus Database: 270.12.48/2148 - Release Date: 06/01/09
06:09:00
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66336 From: livia_plauta Date: 2009-06-01
Subject: Fava beans and death (Was:Re: KALEDAE IUNIAE ...)
Salvete omnes,
reading about fava beans (which are obstinately called just "beans" by our Pontifex maximus, I suddenly thought of a possible reason why they are so often associated with death and the dead.

The association might be much more concrete than we imagine.

In Sardinia, a genetic disease called favism is quite widespread. It makes the affected person very strongly allergic to fava beans. A fabic person not only cannot eat fava beans, or even be in the same room with them, but they cannot even eat peas which have been grown near fava beans.
For a fabic person, eating fava beans will, quite literally, cause death.

I was wondering if there might have been cases of favism also outside Sardinia in ancient Italy. If so, it might have happened now and then that a person eating fava beans "inexplicably" died, contributing to cement the tie between fava and death.

Optime valete,
Livia


> M. Moravius Piscinus cultoribus Deorum et omnibus salutem plurimam dicit: Di vos semper servent.
>
> Hodie est Kalendae Fabariae; haec dies nefastus est: DIE QUINTI TE KALO, IUNO COVELLA : Iunoni Monetae in arce; Fabarici circenses missus.
>
> Fabariae
>
> The name for today's date, the Kalendae Fabariae, comes not from a festival, but instead from an ancient tradition. On this day one is to eat a dish prepared from bean-meal and bacon fat (Macrobius, Saturnalia 1.12.22 and 31). This meal was dedicated to the Goddess Carna and was intended to preserve one's good health (Pliny H. N. 18.117). As it happens, this was the time of year when beans were harvested in Central Italy (Columella, 11.2.20).
>
> "Prayers are offered to this Goddess, for the good preservation of liver, heart, and the other internal organs of our bodies. Her sacrifices are bean-meal and lard, because this is the best food for the nourishment of the body." ~ Macrobius, Saturnalia 1.12.32
>
>
> Today celebrates the dedication of five temples at Rome:
>
> AUC 358 / 395 BCE: Temple of Juno Regina, brought from Veii, dedicated on the Aventine Hill.
>
>
> AUC 365 / 388 BCE: Temple of Mars dedicated in the Campus Martius.
>
> "Father Mars, You who were not at all deaf to my vows, these men, survivors of the battle, dedicate to You the choicest armour of our victory trophies." ~ Silius Italicus Punica 10.553-54
>
> "This same day is a festival of Mars, whose temple is seen from beyond the Portus Capena." ~Ovidius Naso, Fasti 6.191
>
>
> AUC 409 / 344 BCE: Temple of Juno Moneta dedicated on the Arx.
>
> "The Dictator (L. Furius Camillus) thought it his duty to secure the help of the Gods, and during the actual fighting he vowed a temple to Juno Moneta. On his victorious return to Rome, he resigned his Dictatorship to discharge his vow. The senate ordered two commissioners to be appointed to carry out the construction of that temple in a style commensurate with the greatness of the Roman people, and a site was marked out in the Citadel where the house of M. Manlius Capitolinus had stood." ~ Titus Livius 7.28
>
>
> AUC 494 / 259 BCE: Temple of the Tempestes dedicated near the porta Capena.
>
> "You too, Tempests, were considered worthy of a shrine, after our fleet was almost sunk in Corsican waters." ~ Ovidius Naso, Fasti 6.193
>
> "Thanks be to Neptunus and the Tempestates, for returning me safe home again, my venture a success!" ~ Plautus, Stichus 402
>
>
> AUC 733 / 20 BCE: Temple of Mars Ultor dedicated in the Forum Augusti.
>
> "If, Father, my war is authorized by Vesta's priestess, and whenever I prepare to take divine vengeance, Mars, be by my side and satiate cold steel with guilt's blood, and lend Your favour to the better side. If I am victorious for You I'll build a shrine and call You Ultor, Mars the Avenger." ~ Ovid Fasti 5.573-77
>
>
> AUC 736 / 17 BCE: Ludi Saeculares led by Augustus and Agrippa
>
> Acta Sacrorum Saecularium
>
> A proclamation was sent out asking the populace of Rome to participate. "All Free Men, you are bid to pray and fast. On the Capitolium, before the Temple of Jupiter, and on the Aventine before the temple of Diana (join with) the crowded populace present and for the Gods gather sweet-smelling herbs to offer."
>
> Those who were 25 or older were to convene on the Capitolium. From among those who were younger, two choruses were selected of male and female voices to sing a hymn specially composed for the occasion by Horace. As some rites of the Ludi Saeculares were reserved for women to conduct, a second decree was issued on the Kalendae Fabariae:
>
> "And the edict was issued: The quindecimviri sacris faciundis decree: Since, insofar as it accords with proper custom, and in like manner has been observed in numerous precedents, whenever there has been a rightful cause for public celebration, it has been decided that the mourning of women should be suspended; and since it seems that it is appropriate both to the honor of the gods and to the remembrance of their worship that that should apply to the time of solemn rites and games and that it should be scrupulously observed –therefore we have decided that it is incumbent on us to issue to women a decree by edict, that they should suspend mourning." ~ CIL 6.32323 Lines 110b-14
>
>
> The Ludi Saeculares began soon after Midnight with a nighttime sacrifice to the Moirai in the Campus Martius
>
> "On the following night, on the Campus Martius, next to the Tiber, [the emperor Caesar Augustus sacrificed] according to the Greek rite [nine female lambs to the divine Moirai (Fates) as whole burnt offering; and by the same rite he sacrificed nine female goats as a whole burnt offerings and spoke the following prayer: "Moirai, as it is prescribed for you in the Sibylline books - and for this reason may good fortune attend the Roman people, the Quirites – let sacrifice be made to you with nine female lambs and nine female goats burnt whole for you. I beg you and pray that you may increase the power and majesty of the Roman people, the Quirites, in war and peace; and that the Latins may always be obedient; and that you may grant eternal safety, victory and health to the Roman people, the Quirites; and that you may protect the Roman people, the Quirites, and the legions of the Roman people, the Quirites; and that you may keep safe and make greater the state of the Roman people, the Quirites, and that you may be favorable and propitious to the Roman people], the Quirites, to the collegium of the quindecimviri, to me, to my house, to my household; and that you may accept this sacrifice of nine female lambs and nine female goats, to be burnt whole for you in sacrifice. For these reasons be honoured with the sacrifice of this female lamb, become favourable and propitious to the Roman people, the Quirites, to the collegium of the quindecimviri, to myself, to my house, to my household.
>
> "When the sacrifice was completed, games were celebrated by night on a stage, without the additional construction of a theatre and without the erection of seating. One hundred and ten matrons, who had been designated by decree of the quindecimviri, held sellisternia with two seats set out for Juno and Diana.
>
> "Then the games were celebrated with plays in Latin on a wooden theatre which had been erected on the Campus Martius next to the Tiber, and in the same manner women who were mistresses of households held sellisternia, and the games which had begun to take place at night were not interrupted." ~ CIL 6.32323 Lines 90-110
>
> "Juno Regina, we, one hundred and ten the mothers of the families of the people of Rome, the Quirites, pray You allow what is now beneficial to the people of Rome, the Quirites, may then be made better, and we brides implore You to aid and increase the sovereign power and majesty of the people of Rome, the Quirites, in war and peace, and always to watch over the fame of the Latins. And may You favor the people of Rome, the Quirites, and the legions of the people of Rome, the Quirites, and preserve the republic of the people of Rome, the Quirites, and may You willingly favor and prosper us, our homes, and our families. This is what the one hundred and ten mothers of the families of the people of Rome, the Quirites, we brides of our families, pray, entreat, and implore You to grant." ~ CIL 6.32329. 10 sqq. Acta Sacrorum Saecularium addition
>
> "On the Kalends of June, on the Capitoline Hill, the emperor Caesar Augustus sacrificed a bull to Jupiter Optimus Maximus burnt whole for him, and in the same place Marcus Agrippa sacrificed a second. They spoke a prayer, as follows: "Jupiter Optimus Maximus, as it is prescribed for you in those books –and for this [reason] may good fortune attend the Roman people, the Quirites – let sacrifice be made to you with this fine bull. I beg you and pray." The rest as above. At the sacred vessel were Caesar, Agrippa, Scaevola, Sentius, Lollius, Asinius Gallus, and Rabilis (all the members of the quindecimviri).
>
> "Then the games were celebrated with plays in Latin on a wooden theatre which had been erected on the Campus Martius next to the Tiber, and in the same manner women who were mistresses of households held sellisternia, and the games which had begun to take place at night were not interrupted.
>
> "Then by night, next to the Tiber, the emperor Caesar Augustus made sacrifice to the divine Ilythiae with nine cakes, nine popana, nine phthoes; he spoke the following prayer: "Ilythia, as it is prescribed for you in those books –and for this reason [may every good fortune attend] the Roman people, the Quirites – let sacrifice be made to you with nine popana, nine cakes, nine phthoes. I beg and pray. The rest as above." ~ CIL 6.32323 Lines 103-110; 115-118
>
> "Ilythia. You who are compassionate towards women, who suffer with great labor pains, their bodies strained in slow birth of the hidden child, gently attend her, Ilythia, and favor my prayers." ~ Ovidius Naso, Amores II.14.19-24
>
>
> AUC 790 / 37 CE: Emperor Caligula gives the people a congiarium
>
> AUC 820 / 67 CE: Flavius Vespasianus captures Jotapata
>
> AUC 946 / 193 CE: Eemperor Didius Julianus deposed; Septimius Severus recognized as Emperor at Rome
>
>
> Our thought for today is from Democritus, the Golden Sayings 64:
>
> "The friendship of one wise man is better than that of every fool."
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66337 From: C. Maria Caeca Date: 2009-06-01
Subject: Re: Fava beans and death (Was:Re: KALEDAE IUNIAE ...)
Salve Livia Plauta, et salvete Omnes

That was a very interesting and informative post ... but I must admit that,
before I opened it, and had read only the subject line, that line reminded
me of a rather ... gruesome ... bit of dialog in the book "Silence of the
Lambs" (which actually made a better movie than book, especially the change
in the ending.)

Maria Caeca, *very* glad the sun is shining brightly at the moment!
----- Original Message -----
From: "livia_plauta" <livia.plauta@...>
To: <Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Monday, June 01, 2009 5:24 PM
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Fava beans and death (Was:Re: KALEDAE IUNIAE ...)



Salvete omnes,
reading about fava beans (which are obstinately called just "beans" by our
Pontifex maximus, I suddenly thought of a possible reason why they are so
often associated with death and the dead.

The association might be much more concrete than we imagine.

In Sardinia, a genetic disease called favism is quite widespread. It makes
the affected person very strongly allergic to fava beans. A fabic person not
only cannot eat fava beans, or even be in the same room with them, but they
cannot even eat peas which have been grown near fava beans.
For a fabic person, eating fava beans will, quite literally, cause death.

I was wondering if there might have been cases of favism also outside
Sardinia in ancient Italy. If so, it might have happened now and then that a
person eating fava beans "inexplicably" died, contributing to cement the tie
between fava and death.

Optime valete,
Livia


> M. Moravius Piscinus cultoribus Deorum et omnibus salutem plurimam dicit:
> Di vos semper servent.
>
> Hodie est Kalendae Fabariae; haec dies nefastus est: DIE QUINTI TE KALO,
> IUNO COVELLA : Iunoni Monetae in arce; Fabarici circenses missus.
>
> Fabariae
>
> The name for today's date, the Kalendae Fabariae, comes not from a
> festival, but instead from an ancient tradition. On this day one is to
> eat a dish prepared from bean-meal and bacon fat (Macrobius, Saturnalia
> 1.12.22 and 31). This meal was dedicated to the Goddess Carna and was
> intended to preserve one's good health (Pliny H. N. 18.117). As it
> happens, this was the time of year when beans were harvested in Central
> Italy (Columella, 11.2.20).
>
> "Prayers are offered to this Goddess, for the good preservation of liver,
> heart, and the other internal organs of our bodies. Her sacrifices are
> bean-meal and lard, because this is the best food for the nourishment of
> the body." ~ Macrobius, Saturnalia 1.12.32
>
>
> Today celebrates the dedication of five temples at Rome:
>
> AUC 358 / 395 BCE: Temple of Juno Regina, brought from Veii, dedicated on
> the Aventine Hill.
>
>
> AUC 365 / 388 BCE: Temple of Mars dedicated in the Campus Martius.
>
> "Father Mars, You who were not at all deaf to my vows, these men,
> survivors of the battle, dedicate to You the choicest armour of our
> victory trophies." ~ Silius Italicus Punica 10.553-54
>
> "This same day is a festival of Mars, whose temple is seen from beyond
> the Portus Capena." ~Ovidius Naso, Fasti 6.191
>
>
> AUC 409 / 344 BCE: Temple of Juno Moneta dedicated on the Arx.
>
> "The Dictator (L. Furius Camillus) thought it his duty to secure the help
> of the Gods, and during the actual fighting he vowed a temple to Juno
> Moneta. On his victorious return to Rome, he resigned his Dictatorship to
> discharge his vow. The senate ordered two commissioners to be appointed to
> carry out the construction of that temple in a style commensurate with the
> greatness of the Roman people, and a site was marked out in the Citadel
> where the house of M. Manlius Capitolinus had stood." ~ Titus Livius 7.28
>
>
> AUC 494 / 259 BCE: Temple of the Tempestes dedicated near the porta
> Capena.
>
> "You too, Tempests, were considered worthy of a shrine, after our fleet
> was almost sunk in Corsican waters." ~ Ovidius Naso, Fasti 6.193
>
> "Thanks be to Neptunus and the Tempestates, for returning me safe home
> again, my venture a success!" ~ Plautus, Stichus 402
>
>
> AUC 733 / 20 BCE: Temple of Mars Ultor dedicated in the Forum Augusti.
>
> "If, Father, my war is authorized by Vesta's priestess, and whenever I
> prepare to take divine vengeance, Mars, be by my side and satiate cold
> steel with guilt's blood, and lend Your favour to the better side. If I am
> victorious for You I'll build a shrine and call You Ultor, Mars the
> Avenger." ~ Ovid Fasti 5.573-77
>
>
> AUC 736 / 17 BCE: Ludi Saeculares led by Augustus and Agrippa
>
> Acta Sacrorum Saecularium
>
> A proclamation was sent out asking the populace of Rome to participate.
> "All Free Men, you are bid to pray and fast. On the Capitolium, before
> the Temple of Jupiter, and on the Aventine before the temple of Diana
> (join with) the crowded populace present and for the Gods gather
> sweet-smelling herbs to offer."
>
> Those who were 25 or older were to convene on the Capitolium. From among
> those who were younger, two choruses were selected of male and female
> voices to sing a hymn specially composed for the occasion by Horace. As
> some rites of the Ludi Saeculares were reserved for women to conduct, a
> second decree was issued on the Kalendae Fabariae:
>
> "And the edict was issued: The quindecimviri sacris faciundis decree:
> Since, insofar as it accords with proper custom, and in like manner has
> been observed in numerous precedents, whenever there has been a rightful
> cause for public celebration, it has been decided that the mourning of
> women should be suspended; and since it seems that it is appropriate both
> to the honor of the gods and to the remembrance of their worship that that
> should apply to the time of solemn rites and games and that it should be
> scrupulously observed -therefore we have decided that it is incumbent on
> us to issue to women a decree by edict, that they should suspend
> mourning." ~ CIL 6.32323 Lines 110b-14
>
>
> The Ludi Saeculares began soon after Midnight with a nighttime sacrifice
> to the Moirai in the Campus Martius
>
> "On the following night, on the Campus Martius, next to the Tiber, [the
> emperor Caesar Augustus sacrificed] according to the Greek rite [nine
> female lambs to the divine Moirai (Fates) as whole burnt offering; and by
> the same rite he sacrificed nine female goats as a whole burnt offerings
> and spoke the following prayer: "Moirai, as it is prescribed for you in
> the Sibylline books - and for this reason may good fortune attend the
> Roman people, the Quirites - let sacrifice be made to you with nine female
> lambs and nine female goats burnt whole for you. I beg you and pray that
> you may increase the power and majesty of the Roman people, the Quirites,
> in war and peace; and that the Latins may always be obedient; and that you
> may grant eternal safety, victory and health to the Roman people, the
> Quirites; and that you may protect the Roman people, the Quirites, and the
> legions of the Roman people, the Quirites; and that you may keep safe and
> make greater the state of the Roman people, the Quirites, and that you may
> be favorable and propitious to the Roman people], the Quirites, to the
> collegium of the quindecimviri, to me, to my house, to my household; and
> that you may accept this sacrifice of nine female lambs and nine female
> goats, to be burnt whole for you in sacrifice. For these reasons be
> honoured with the sacrifice of this female lamb, become favourable and
> propitious to the Roman people, the Quirites, to the collegium of the
> quindecimviri, to myself, to my house, to my household.
>
> "When the sacrifice was completed, games were celebrated by night on a
> stage, without the additional construction of a theatre and without the
> erection of seating. One hundred and ten matrons, who had been designated
> by decree of the quindecimviri, held sellisternia with two seats set out
> for Juno and Diana.
>
> "Then the games were celebrated with plays in Latin on a wooden theatre
> which had been erected on the Campus Martius next to the Tiber, and in the
> same manner women who were mistresses of households held sellisternia, and
> the games which had begun to take place at night were not interrupted." ~
> CIL 6.32323 Lines 90-110
>
> "Juno Regina, we, one hundred and ten the mothers of the families of the
> people of Rome, the Quirites, pray You allow what is now beneficial to the
> people of Rome, the Quirites, may then be made better, and we brides
> implore You to aid and increase the sovereign power and majesty of the
> people of Rome, the Quirites, in war and peace, and always to watch over
> the fame of the Latins. And may You favor the people of Rome, the
> Quirites, and the legions of the people of Rome, the Quirites, and
> preserve the republic of the people of Rome, the Quirites, and may You
> willingly favor and prosper us, our homes, and our families. This is what
> the one hundred and ten mothers of the families of the people of Rome, the
> Quirites, we brides of our families, pray, entreat, and implore You to
> grant." ~ CIL 6.32329. 10 sqq. Acta Sacrorum Saecularium addition
>
> "On the Kalends of June, on the Capitoline Hill, the emperor Caesar
> Augustus sacrificed a bull to Jupiter Optimus Maximus burnt whole for him,
> and in the same place Marcus Agrippa sacrificed a second. They spoke a
> prayer, as follows: "Jupiter Optimus Maximus, as it is prescribed for you
> in those books -and for this [reason] may good fortune attend the Roman
> people, the Quirites - let sacrifice be made to you with this fine bull. I
> beg you and pray." The rest as above. At the sacred vessel were Caesar,
> Agrippa, Scaevola, Sentius, Lollius, Asinius Gallus, and Rabilis (all the
> members of the quindecimviri).
>
> "Then the games were celebrated with plays in Latin on a wooden theatre
> which had been erected on the Campus Martius next to the Tiber, and in the
> same manner women who were mistresses of households held sellisternia, and
> the games which had begun to take place at night were not interrupted.
>
> "Then by night, next to the Tiber, the emperor Caesar Augustus made
> sacrifice to the divine Ilythiae with nine cakes, nine popana, nine
> phthoes; he spoke the following prayer: "Ilythia, as it is prescribed for
> you in those books -and for this reason [may every good fortune attend]
> the Roman people, the Quirites - let sacrifice be made to you with nine
> popana, nine cakes, nine phthoes. I beg and pray. The rest as above." ~
> CIL 6.32323 Lines 103-110; 115-118
>
> "Ilythia. You who are compassionate towards women, who suffer with great
> labor pains, their bodies strained in slow birth of the hidden child,
> gently attend her, Ilythia, and favor my prayers." ~ Ovidius Naso, Amores
> II.14.19-24
>
>
> AUC 790 / 37 CE: Emperor Caligula gives the people a congiarium
>
> AUC 820 / 67 CE: Flavius Vespasianus captures Jotapata
>
> AUC 946 / 193 CE: Eemperor Didius Julianus deposed; Septimius Severus
> recognized as Emperor at Rome
>
>
> Our thought for today is from Democritus, the Golden Sayings 64:
>
> "The friendship of one wise man is better than that of every fool."
>




------------------------------------

Yahoo! Groups Links





--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 8.5.339 / Virus Database: 270.12.48/2148 - Release Date: 06/01/09
06:09:00
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66338 From: Maior Date: 2009-06-01
Subject: Fava beans and death (Was:Re: KALEDAE IUNIAE ...)
Salve Livia:
we had this very same exciting discussion (hey we thought so;-) in the CP, and after a bit of research it seems beans were served as funeral food in Greece and Rome. Fava beans were black with cthonic associations and the common bean served, so there it is. It has nothing to do with Favism. If you like I can look through the group and give you the references...
valeas
Maior
>
>
> Salvete omnes,
> reading about fava beans (which are obstinately called just "beans" by our Pontifex maximus, I suddenly thought of a possible reason why they are so often associated with death and the dead.
>
> The association might be much more concrete than we imagine.
>
> In Sardinia, a genetic disease called favism is quite widespread. It makes the affected person very strongly allergic to fava beans. A fabic person not only cannot eat fava beans, or even be in the same room with them, but they cannot even eat peas which have been grown near fava beans.
> For a fabic person, eating fava beans will, quite literally, cause death.
>
> I was wondering if there might have been cases of favism also outside Sardinia in ancient Italy. If so, it might have happened now and then that a person eating fava beans "inexplicably" died, contributing to cement the tie between fava and death.
>
> Optime valete,
> Livia
>
>
> > M. Moravius Piscinus cultoribus Deorum et omnibus salutem plurimam dicit: Di vos semper servent.
> >
> > Hodie est Kalendae Fabariae; haec dies nefastus est: DIE QUINTI TE KALO, IUNO COVELLA : Iunoni Monetae in arce; Fabarici circenses missus.
> >
> > Fabariae
> >
> > The name for today's date, the Kalendae Fabariae, comes not from a festival, but instead from an ancient tradition. On this day one is to eat a dish prepared from bean-meal and bacon fat (Macrobius, Saturnalia 1.12.22 and 31). This meal was dedicated to the Goddess Carna and was intended to preserve one's good health (Pliny H. N. 18.117). As it happens, this was the time of year when beans were harvested in Central Italy (Columella, 11.2.20).
> >
> > "Prayers are offered to this Goddess, for the good preservation of liver, heart, and the other internal organs of our bodies. Her sacrifices are bean-meal and lard, because this is the best food for the nourishment of the body." ~ Macrobius, Saturnalia 1.12.32
> >
> >
> > Today celebrates the dedication of five temples at Rome:
> >
> > AUC 358 / 395 BCE: Temple of Juno Regina, brought from Veii, dedicated on the Aventine Hill.
> >
> >
> > AUC 365 / 388 BCE: Temple of Mars dedicated in the Campus Martius.
> >
> > "Father Mars, You who were not at all deaf to my vows, these men, survivors of the battle, dedicate to You the choicest armour of our victory trophies." ~ Silius Italicus Punica 10.553-54
> >
> > "This same day is a festival of Mars, whose temple is seen from beyond the Portus Capena." ~Ovidius Naso, Fasti 6.191
> >
> >
> > AUC 409 / 344 BCE: Temple of Juno Moneta dedicated on the Arx.
> >
> > "The Dictator (L. Furius Camillus) thought it his duty to secure the help of the Gods, and during the actual fighting he vowed a temple to Juno Moneta. On his victorious return to Rome, he resigned his Dictatorship to discharge his vow. The senate ordered two commissioners to be appointed to carry out the construction of that temple in a style commensurate with the greatness of the Roman people, and a site was marked out in the Citadel where the house of M. Manlius Capitolinus had stood." ~ Titus Livius 7.28
> >
> >
> > AUC 494 / 259 BCE: Temple of the Tempestes dedicated near the porta Capena.
> >
> > "You too, Tempests, were considered worthy of a shrine, after our fleet was almost sunk in Corsican waters." ~ Ovidius Naso, Fasti 6.193
> >
> > "Thanks be to Neptunus and the Tempestates, for returning me safe home again, my venture a success!" ~ Plautus, Stichus 402
> >
> >
> > AUC 733 / 20 BCE: Temple of Mars Ultor dedicated in the Forum Augusti.
> >
> > "If, Father, my war is authorized by Vesta's priestess, and whenever I prepare to take divine vengeance, Mars, be by my side and satiate cold steel with guilt's blood, and lend Your favour to the better side. If I am victorious for You I'll build a shrine and call You Ultor, Mars the Avenger." ~ Ovid Fasti 5.573-77
> >
> >
> > AUC 736 / 17 BCE: Ludi Saeculares led by Augustus and Agrippa
> >
> > Acta Sacrorum Saecularium
> >
> > A proclamation was sent out asking the populace of Rome to participate. "All Free Men, you are bid to pray and fast. On the Capitolium, before the Temple of Jupiter, and on the Aventine before the temple of Diana (join with) the crowded populace present and for the Gods gather sweet-smelling herbs to offer."
> >
> > Those who were 25 or older were to convene on the Capitolium. From among those who were younger, two choruses were selected of male and female voices to sing a hymn specially composed for the occasion by Horace. As some rites of the Ludi Saeculares were reserved for women to conduct, a second decree was issued on the Kalendae Fabariae:
> >
> > "And the edict was issued: The quindecimviri sacris faciundis decree: Since, insofar as it accords with proper custom, and in like manner has been observed in numerous precedents, whenever there has been a rightful cause for public celebration, it has been decided that the mourning of women should be suspended; and since it seems that it is appropriate both to the honor of the gods and to the remembrance of their worship that that should apply to the time of solemn rites and games and that it should be scrupulously observed –therefore we have decided that it is incumbent on us to issue to women a decree by edict, that they should suspend mourning." ~ CIL 6.32323 Lines 110b-14
> >
> >
> > The Ludi Saeculares began soon after Midnight with a nighttime sacrifice to the Moirai in the Campus Martius
> >
> > "On the following night, on the Campus Martius, next to the Tiber, [the emperor Caesar Augustus sacrificed] according to the Greek rite [nine female lambs to the divine Moirai (Fates) as whole burnt offering; and by the same rite he sacrificed nine female goats as a whole burnt offerings and spoke the following prayer: "Moirai, as it is prescribed for you in the Sibylline books - and for this reason may good fortune attend the Roman people, the Quirites – let sacrifice be made to you with nine female lambs and nine female goats burnt whole for you. I beg you and pray that you may increase the power and majesty of the Roman people, the Quirites, in war and peace; and that the Latins may always be obedient; and that you may grant eternal safety, victory and health to the Roman people, the Quirites; and that you may protect the Roman people, the Quirites, and the legions of the Roman people, the Quirites; and that you may keep safe and make greater the state of the Roman people, the Quirites, and that you may be favorable and propitious to the Roman people], the Quirites, to the collegium of the quindecimviri, to me, to my house, to my household; and that you may accept this sacrifice of nine female lambs and nine female goats, to be burnt whole for you in sacrifice. For these reasons be honoured with the sacrifice of this female lamb, become favourable and propitious to the Roman people, the Quirites, to the collegium of the quindecimviri, to myself, to my house, to my household.
> >
> > "When the sacrifice was completed, games were celebrated by night on a stage, without the additional construction of a theatre and without the erection of seating. One hundred and ten matrons, who had been designated by decree of the quindecimviri, held sellisternia with two seats set out for Juno and Diana.
> >
> > "Then the games were celebrated with plays in Latin on a wooden theatre which had been erected on the Campus Martius next to the Tiber, and in the same manner women who were mistresses of households held sellisternia, and the games which had begun to take place at night were not interrupted." ~ CIL 6.32323 Lines 90-110
> >
> > "Juno Regina, we, one hundred and ten the mothers of the families of the people of Rome, the Quirites, pray You allow what is now beneficial to the people of Rome, the Quirites, may then be made better, and we brides implore You to aid and increase the sovereign power and majesty of the people of Rome, the Quirites, in war and peace, and always to watch over the fame of the Latins. And may You favor the people of Rome, the Quirites, and the legions of the people of Rome, the Quirites, and preserve the republic of the people of Rome, the Quirites, and may You willingly favor and prosper us, our homes, and our families. This is what the one hundred and ten mothers of the families of the people of Rome, the Quirites, we brides of our families, pray, entreat, and implore You to grant." ~ CIL 6.32329. 10 sqq. Acta Sacrorum Saecularium addition
> >
> > "On the Kalends of June, on the Capitoline Hill, the emperor Caesar Augustus sacrificed a bull to Jupiter Optimus Maximus burnt whole for him, and in the same place Marcus Agrippa sacrificed a second. They spoke a prayer, as follows: "Jupiter Optimus Maximus, as it is prescribed for you in those books –and for this [reason] may good fortune attend the Roman people, the Quirites – let sacrifice be made to you with this fine bull. I beg you and pray." The rest as above. At the sacred vessel were Caesar, Agrippa, Scaevola, Sentius, Lollius, Asinius Gallus, and Rabilis (all the members of the quindecimviri).
> >
> > "Then the games were celebrated with plays in Latin on a wooden theatre which had been erected on the Campus Martius next to the Tiber, and in the same manner women who were mistresses of households held sellisternia, and the games which had begun to take place at night were not interrupted.
> >
> > "Then by night, next to the Tiber, the emperor Caesar Augustus made sacrifice to the divine Ilythiae with nine cakes, nine popana, nine phthoes; he spoke the following prayer: "Ilythia, as it is prescribed for you in those books –and for this reason [may every good fortune attend] the Roman people, the Quirites – let sacrifice be made to you with nine popana, nine cakes, nine phthoes. I beg and pray. The rest as above." ~ CIL 6.32323 Lines 103-110; 115-118
> >
> > "Ilythia. You who are compassionate towards women, who suffer with great labor pains, their bodies strained in slow birth of the hidden child, gently attend her, Ilythia, and favor my prayers." ~ Ovidius Naso, Amores II.14.19-24
> >
> >
> > AUC 790 / 37 CE: Emperor Caligula gives the people a congiarium
> >
> > AUC 820 / 67 CE: Flavius Vespasianus captures Jotapata
> >
> > AUC 946 / 193 CE: Eemperor Didius Julianus deposed; Septimius Severus recognized as Emperor at Rome
> >
> >
> > Our thought for today is from Democritus, the Golden Sayings 64:
> >
> > "The friendship of one wise man is better than that of every fool."
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66339 From: L Julia Aquila Date: 2009-06-01
Subject: Fava beans and death (Was:Re: KALEDAE IUNIAE ...)
Salvete,

Here is some info from the "American Medical Association Handbook of Poisonous and Injurious Plants:"

"Toxic Part: Seeds, raw or cooked and pollen when inhaled.

Toxin: An antimetabolite, 2,6-diaminopurine; a glycoside, vicine.

Symptoms: In susceptible humans, within a few minutes of inhaling pollen or several hours after eating the beans, an allergic reaction occurs with dizziness, diarrhea, nausea and vomiting, abdominal pain and sheer prostration. Blood appears in the urine, which turns reddish-brown to black. Anemia develops within a few hours or a day. Male children are the most frequently affected and apparently all fatalities have been children."

Favism, the severe hemolytic anemia, occurs only in susceptible individuals who have inherited a deficiency of an enzyme, glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase. This genetic trait occurs among people of the Mediterranean region and among black Africans. Most individuals have this enzyme and are not affected."

Valete,
Julia



--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Maior" <rory12001@...> wrote:
>
> Salve Livia:
> we had this very same exciting discussion (hey we thought so;-) in the CP, and after a bit of research it seems beans were served as funeral food in Greece and Rome. Fava beans were black with cthonic associations and the common bean served, so there it is. It has nothing to do with Favism. If you like I can look through the group and give you the references...
> valeas
> Maior
> >
> >
> > Salvete omnes,
> > reading about fava beans (which are obstinately called just "beans" by our Pontifex maximus, I suddenly thought of a possible reason why they are so often associated with death and the dead.
> >
> > The association might be much more concrete than we imagine.
> >
> > In Sardinia, a genetic disease called favism is quite widespread. It makes the affected person very strongly allergic to fava beans. A fabic person not only cannot eat fava beans, or even be in the same room with them, but they cannot even eat peas which have been grown near fava beans.
> > For a fabic person, eating fava beans will, quite literally, cause death.
> >
> > I was wondering if there might have been cases of favism also outside Sardinia in ancient Italy. If so, it might have happened now and then that a person eating fava beans "inexplicably" died, contributing to cement the tie between fava and death.
> >
> > Optime valete,
> > Livia
> >
> >
> > > M. Moravius Piscinus cultoribus Deorum et omnibus salutem plurimam dicit: Di vos semper servent.
> > >
> > > Hodie est Kalendae Fabariae; haec dies nefastus est: DIE QUINTI TE KALO, IUNO COVELLA : Iunoni Monetae in arce; Fabarici circenses missus.
> > >
> > > Fabariae
> > >
> > > The name for today's date, the Kalendae Fabariae, comes not from a festival, but instead from an ancient tradition. On this day one is to eat a dish prepared from bean-meal and bacon fat (Macrobius, Saturnalia 1.12.22 and 31). This meal was dedicated to the Goddess Carna and was intended to preserve one's good health (Pliny H. N. 18.117). As it happens, this was the time of year when beans were harvested in Central Italy (Columella, 11.2.20).
> > >
> > > "Prayers are offered to this Goddess, for the good preservation of liver, heart, and the other internal organs of our bodies. Her sacrifices are bean-meal and lard, because this is the best food for the nourishment of the body." ~ Macrobius, Saturnalia 1.12.32
> > >
> > >
> > > Today celebrates the dedication of five temples at Rome:
> > >
> > > AUC 358 / 395 BCE: Temple of Juno Regina, brought from Veii, dedicated on the Aventine Hill.
> > >
> > >
> > > AUC 365 / 388 BCE: Temple of Mars dedicated in the Campus Martius.
> > >
> > > "Father Mars, You who were not at all deaf to my vows, these men, survivors of the battle, dedicate to You the choicest armour of our victory trophies." ~ Silius Italicus Punica 10.553-54
> > >
> > > "This same day is a festival of Mars, whose temple is seen from beyond the Portus Capena." ~Ovidius Naso, Fasti 6.191
> > >
> > >
> > > AUC 409 / 344 BCE: Temple of Juno Moneta dedicated on the Arx.
> > >
> > > "The Dictator (L. Furius Camillus) thought it his duty to secure the help of the Gods, and during the actual fighting he vowed a temple to Juno Moneta. On his victorious return to Rome, he resigned his Dictatorship to discharge his vow. The senate ordered two commissioners to be appointed to carry out the construction of that temple in a style commensurate with the greatness of the Roman people, and a site was marked out in the Citadel where the house of M. Manlius Capitolinus had stood." ~ Titus Livius 7.28
> > >
> > >
> > > AUC 494 / 259 BCE: Temple of the Tempestes dedicated near the porta Capena.
> > >
> > > "You too, Tempests, were considered worthy of a shrine, after our fleet was almost sunk in Corsican waters." ~ Ovidius Naso, Fasti 6.193
> > >
> > > "Thanks be to Neptunus and the Tempestates, for returning me safe home again, my venture a success!" ~ Plautus, Stichus 402
> > >
> > >
> > > AUC 733 / 20 BCE: Temple of Mars Ultor dedicated in the Forum Augusti.
> > >
> > > "If, Father, my war is authorized by Vesta's priestess, and whenever I prepare to take divine vengeance, Mars, be by my side and satiate cold steel with guilt's blood, and lend Your favour to the better side. If I am victorious for You I'll build a shrine and call You Ultor, Mars the Avenger." ~ Ovid Fasti 5.573-77
> > >
> > >
> > > AUC 736 / 17 BCE: Ludi Saeculares led by Augustus and Agrippa
> > >
> > > Acta Sacrorum Saecularium
> > >
> > > A proclamation was sent out asking the populace of Rome to participate. "All Free Men, you are bid to pray and fast. On the Capitolium, before the Temple of Jupiter, and on the Aventine before the temple of Diana (join with) the crowded populace present and for the Gods gather sweet-smelling herbs to offer."
> > >
> > > Those who were 25 or older were to convene on the Capitolium. From among those who were younger, two choruses were selected of male and female voices to sing a hymn specially composed for the occasion by Horace. As some rites of the Ludi Saeculares were reserved for women to conduct, a second decree was issued on the Kalendae Fabariae:
> > >
> > > "And the edict was issued: The quindecimviri sacris faciundis decree: Since, insofar as it accords with proper custom, and in like manner has been observed in numerous precedents, whenever there has been a rightful cause for public celebration, it has been decided that the mourning of women should be suspended; and since it seems that it is appropriate both to the honor of the gods and to the remembrance of their worship that that should apply to the time of solemn rites and games and that it should be scrupulously observed –therefore we have decided that it is incumbent on us to issue to women a decree by edict, that they should suspend mourning." ~ CIL 6.32323 Lines 110b-14
> > >
> > >
> > > The Ludi Saeculares began soon after Midnight with a nighttime sacrifice to the Moirai in the Campus Martius
> > >
> > > "On the following night, on the Campus Martius, next to the Tiber, [the emperor Caesar Augustus sacrificed] according to the Greek rite [nine female lambs to the divine Moirai (Fates) as whole burnt offering; and by the same rite he sacrificed nine female goats as a whole burnt offerings and spoke the following prayer: "Moirai, as it is prescribed for you in the Sibylline books - and for this reason may good fortune attend the Roman people, the Quirites – let sacrifice be made to you with nine female lambs and nine female goats burnt whole for you. I beg you and pray that you may increase the power and majesty of the Roman people, the Quirites, in war and peace; and that the Latins may always be obedient; and that you may grant eternal safety, victory and health to the Roman people, the Quirites; and that you may protect the Roman people, the Quirites, and the legions of the Roman people, the Quirites; and that you may keep safe and make greater the state of the Roman people, the Quirites, and that you may be favorable and propitious to the Roman people], the Quirites, to the collegium of the quindecimviri, to me, to my house, to my household; and that you may accept this sacrifice of nine female lambs and nine female goats, to be burnt whole for you in sacrifice. For these reasons be honoured with the sacrifice of this female lamb, become favourable and propitious to the Roman people, the Quirites, to the collegium of the quindecimviri, to myself, to my house, to my household.
> > >
> > > "When the sacrifice was completed, games were celebrated by night on a stage, without the additional construction of a theatre and without the erection of seating. One hundred and ten matrons, who had been designated by decree of the quindecimviri, held sellisternia with two seats set out for Juno and Diana.
> > >
> > > "Then the games were celebrated with plays in Latin on a wooden theatre which had been erected on the Campus Martius next to the Tiber, and in the same manner women who were mistresses of households held sellisternia, and the games which had begun to take place at night were not interrupted." ~ CIL 6.32323 Lines 90-110
> > >
> > > "Juno Regina, we, one hundred and ten the mothers of the families of the people of Rome, the Quirites, pray You allow what is now beneficial to the people of Rome, the Quirites, may then be made better, and we brides implore You to aid and increase the sovereign power and majesty of the people of Rome, the Quirites, in war and peace, and always to watch over the fame of the Latins. And may You favor the people of Rome, the Quirites, and the legions of the people of Rome, the Quirites, and preserve the republic of the people of Rome, the Quirites, and may You willingly favor and prosper us, our homes, and our families. This is what the one hundred and ten mothers of the families of the people of Rome, the Quirites, we brides of our families, pray, entreat, and implore You to grant." ~ CIL 6.32329. 10 sqq. Acta Sacrorum Saecularium addition
> > >
> > > "On the Kalends of June, on the Capitoline Hill, the emperor Caesar Augustus sacrificed a bull to Jupiter Optimus Maximus burnt whole for him, and in the same place Marcus Agrippa sacrificed a second. They spoke a prayer, as follows: "Jupiter Optimus Maximus, as it is prescribed for you in those books –and for this [reason] may good fortune attend the Roman people, the Quirites – let sacrifice be made to you with this fine bull. I beg you and pray." The rest as above. At the sacred vessel were Caesar, Agrippa, Scaevola, Sentius, Lollius, Asinius Gallus, and Rabilis (all the members of the quindecimviri).
> > >
> > > "Then the games were celebrated with plays in Latin on a wooden theatre which had been erected on the Campus Martius next to the Tiber, and in the same manner women who were mistresses of households held sellisternia, and the games which had begun to take place at night were not interrupted.
> > >
> > > "Then by night, next to the Tiber, the emperor Caesar Augustus made sacrifice to the divine Ilythiae with nine cakes, nine popana, nine phthoes; he spoke the following prayer: "Ilythia, as it is prescribed for you in those books –and for this reason [may every good fortune attend] the Roman people, the Quirites – let sacrifice be made to you with nine popana, nine cakes, nine phthoes. I beg and pray. The rest as above." ~ CIL 6.32323 Lines 103-110; 115-118
> > >
> > > "Ilythia. You who are compassionate towards women, who suffer with great labor pains, their bodies strained in slow birth of the hidden child, gently attend her, Ilythia, and favor my prayers." ~ Ovidius Naso, Amores II.14.19-24
> > >
> > >
> > > AUC 790 / 37 CE: Emperor Caligula gives the people a congiarium
> > >
> > > AUC 820 / 67 CE: Flavius Vespasianus captures Jotapata
> > >
> > > AUC 946 / 193 CE: Eemperor Didius Julianus deposed; Septimius Severus recognized as Emperor at Rome
> > >
> > >
> > > Our thought for today is from Democritus, the Golden Sayings 64:
> > >
> > > "The friendship of one wise man is better than that of every fool."
> > >
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66340 From: livia_plauta Date: 2009-06-01
Subject: Fava beans and death (Was:Re: KALEDAE IUNIAE ...)
Salve Maior,
I'm sorry to dissent, but fava beans are green and have always been green (unlike the carrot, that underwent several colour changes in its career).
Apparently there's a dark variety, that's still used for some christian rituals. Don't ask me more about that: I discussed the matter during Lemuria with one guy on Facebook (whom I convinced to join NR), and he's the one who said so. Personally I've only ever seen green fava beans.

So the chtonic association is certainly not due to the colour.

Optime vale,
Livia

>
> Salve Livia:
> we had this very same exciting discussion (hey we thought so;-) in the CP, and after a bit of research it seems beans were served as funeral food in Greece and Rome. Fava beans were black with cthonic associations and the common bean served, so there it is. It has nothing to do with Favism. If you like I can look through the group and give you the references...
> valeas
> Maior
> >
> >
> > Salvete omnes,
> > reading about fava beans (which are obstinately called just "beans" by our Pontifex maximus, I suddenly thought of a possible reason why they are so often associated with death and the dead.
> >
> > The association might be much more concrete than we imagine.
> >
> > In Sardinia, a genetic disease called favism is quite widespread. It makes the affected person very strongly allergic to fava beans. A fabic person not only cannot eat fava beans, or even be in the same room with them, but they cannot even eat peas which have been grown near fava beans.
> > For a fabic person, eating fava beans will, quite literally, cause death.
> >
> > I was wondering if there might have been cases of favism also outside Sardinia in ancient Italy. If so, it might have happened now and then that a person eating fava beans "inexplicably" died, contributing to cement the tie between fava and death.
> >
> > Optime valete,
> > Livia
> >
> >
> > > M. Moravius Piscinus cultoribus Deorum et omnibus salutem plurimam dicit: Di vos semper servent.
> > >
> > > Hodie est Kalendae Fabariae; haec dies nefastus est: DIE QUINTI TE KALO, IUNO COVELLA : Iunoni Monetae in arce; Fabarici circenses missus.
> > >
> > > Fabariae
> > >
> > > The name for today's date, the Kalendae Fabariae, comes not from a festival, but instead from an ancient tradition. On this day one is to eat a dish prepared from bean-meal and bacon fat (Macrobius, Saturnalia 1.12.22 and 31). This meal was dedicated to the Goddess Carna and was intended to preserve one's good health (Pliny H. N. 18.117). As it happens, this was the time of year when beans were harvested in Central Italy (Columella, 11.2.20).
> > >
> > > "Prayers are offered to this Goddess, for the good preservation of liver, heart, and the other internal organs of our bodies. Her sacrifices are bean-meal and lard, because this is the best food for the nourishment of the body." ~ Macrobius, Saturnalia 1.12.32
> > >
> > >
> > > Today celebrates the dedication of five temples at Rome:
> > >
> > > AUC 358 / 395 BCE: Temple of Juno Regina, brought from Veii, dedicated on the Aventine Hill.
> > >
> > >
> > > AUC 365 / 388 BCE: Temple of Mars dedicated in the Campus Martius.
> > >
> > > "Father Mars, You who were not at all deaf to my vows, these men, survivors of the battle, dedicate to You the choicest armour of our victory trophies." ~ Silius Italicus Punica 10.553-54
> > >
> > > "This same day is a festival of Mars, whose temple is seen from beyond the Portus Capena." ~Ovidius Naso, Fasti 6.191
> > >
> > >
> > > AUC 409 / 344 BCE: Temple of Juno Moneta dedicated on the Arx.
> > >
> > > "The Dictator (L. Furius Camillus) thought it his duty to secure the help of the Gods, and during the actual fighting he vowed a temple to Juno Moneta. On his victorious return to Rome, he resigned his Dictatorship to discharge his vow. The senate ordered two commissioners to be appointed to carry out the construction of that temple in a style commensurate with the greatness of the Roman people, and a site was marked out in the Citadel where the house of M. Manlius Capitolinus had stood." ~ Titus Livius 7.28
> > >
> > >
> > > AUC 494 / 259 BCE: Temple of the Tempestes dedicated near the porta Capena.
> > >
> > > "You too, Tempests, were considered worthy of a shrine, after our fleet was almost sunk in Corsican waters." ~ Ovidius Naso, Fasti 6.193
> > >
> > > "Thanks be to Neptunus and the Tempestates, for returning me safe home again, my venture a success!" ~ Plautus, Stichus 402
> > >
> > >
> > > AUC 733 / 20 BCE: Temple of Mars Ultor dedicated in the Forum Augusti.
> > >
> > > "If, Father, my war is authorized by Vesta's priestess, and whenever I prepare to take divine vengeance, Mars, be by my side and satiate cold steel with guilt's blood, and lend Your favour to the better side. If I am victorious for You I'll build a shrine and call You Ultor, Mars the Avenger." ~ Ovid Fasti 5.573-77
> > >
> > >
> > > AUC 736 / 17 BCE: Ludi Saeculares led by Augustus and Agrippa
> > >
> > > Acta Sacrorum Saecularium
> > >
> > > A proclamation was sent out asking the populace of Rome to participate. "All Free Men, you are bid to pray and fast. On the Capitolium, before the Temple of Jupiter, and on the Aventine before the temple of Diana (join with) the crowded populace present and for the Gods gather sweet-smelling herbs to offer."
> > >
> > > Those who were 25 or older were to convene on the Capitolium. From among those who were younger, two choruses were selected of male and female voices to sing a hymn specially composed for the occasion by Horace. As some rites of the Ludi Saeculares were reserved for women to conduct, a second decree was issued on the Kalendae Fabariae:
> > >
> > > "And the edict was issued: The quindecimviri sacris faciundis decree: Since, insofar as it accords with proper custom, and in like manner has been observed in numerous precedents, whenever there has been a rightful cause for public celebration, it has been decided that the mourning of women should be suspended; and since it seems that it is appropriate both to the honor of the gods and to the remembrance of their worship that that should apply to the time of solemn rites and games and that it should be scrupulously observed –therefore we have decided that it is incumbent on us to issue to women a decree by edict, that they should suspend mourning." ~ CIL 6.32323 Lines 110b-14
> > >
> > >
> > > The Ludi Saeculares began soon after Midnight with a nighttime sacrifice to the Moirai in the Campus Martius
> > >
> > > "On the following night, on the Campus Martius, next to the Tiber, [the emperor Caesar Augustus sacrificed] according to the Greek rite [nine female lambs to the divine Moirai (Fates) as whole burnt offering; and by the same rite he sacrificed nine female goats as a whole burnt offerings and spoke the following prayer: "Moirai, as it is prescribed for you in the Sibylline books - and for this reason may good fortune attend the Roman people, the Quirites – let sacrifice be made to you with nine female lambs and nine female goats burnt whole for you. I beg you and pray that you may increase the power and majesty of the Roman people, the Quirites, in war and peace; and that the Latins may always be obedient; and that you may grant eternal safety, victory and health to the Roman people, the Quirites; and that you may protect the Roman people, the Quirites, and the legions of the Roman people, the Quirites; and that you may keep safe and make greater the state of the Roman people, the Quirites, and that you may be favorable and propitious to the Roman people], the Quirites, to the collegium of the quindecimviri, to me, to my house, to my household; and that you may accept this sacrifice of nine female lambs and nine female goats, to be burnt whole for you in sacrifice. For these reasons be honoured with the sacrifice of this female lamb, become favourable and propitious to the Roman people, the Quirites, to the collegium of the quindecimviri, to myself, to my house, to my household.
> > >
> > > "When the sacrifice was completed, games were celebrated by night on a stage, without the additional construction of a theatre and without the erection of seating. One hundred and ten matrons, who had been designated by decree of the quindecimviri, held sellisternia with two seats set out for Juno and Diana.
> > >
> > > "Then the games were celebrated with plays in Latin on a wooden theatre which had been erected on the Campus Martius next to the Tiber, and in the same manner women who were mistresses of households held sellisternia, and the games which had begun to take place at night were not interrupted." ~ CIL 6.32323 Lines 90-110
> > >
> > > "Juno Regina, we, one hundred and ten the mothers of the families of the people of Rome, the Quirites, pray You allow what is now beneficial to the people of Rome, the Quirites, may then be made better, and we brides implore You to aid and increase the sovereign power and majesty of the people of Rome, the Quirites, in war and peace, and always to watch over the fame of the Latins. And may You favor the people of Rome, the Quirites, and the legions of the people of Rome, the Quirites, and preserve the republic of the people of Rome, the Quirites, and may You willingly favor and prosper us, our homes, and our families. This is what the one hundred and ten mothers of the families of the people of Rome, the Quirites, we brides of our families, pray, entreat, and implore You to grant." ~ CIL 6.32329. 10 sqq. Acta Sacrorum Saecularium addition
> > >
> > > "On the Kalends of June, on the Capitoline Hill, the emperor Caesar Augustus sacrificed a bull to Jupiter Optimus Maximus burnt whole for him, and in the same place Marcus Agrippa sacrificed a second. They spoke a prayer, as follows: "Jupiter Optimus Maximus, as it is prescribed for you in those books –and for this [reason] may good fortune attend the Roman people, the Quirites – let sacrifice be made to you with this fine bull. I beg you and pray." The rest as above. At the sacred vessel were Caesar, Agrippa, Scaevola, Sentius, Lollius, Asinius Gallus, and Rabilis (all the members of the quindecimviri).
> > >
> > > "Then the games were celebrated with plays in Latin on a wooden theatre which had been erected on the Campus Martius next to the Tiber, and in the same manner women who were mistresses of households held sellisternia, and the games which had begun to take place at night were not interrupted.
> > >
> > > "Then by night, next to the Tiber, the emperor Caesar Augustus made sacrifice to the divine Ilythiae with nine cakes, nine popana, nine phthoes; he spoke the following prayer: "Ilythia, as it is prescribed for you in those books –and for this reason [may every good fortune attend] the Roman people, the Quirites – let sacrifice be made to you with nine popana, nine cakes, nine phthoes. I beg and pray. The rest as above." ~ CIL 6.32323 Lines 103-110; 115-118
> > >
> > > "Ilythia. You who are compassionate towards women, who suffer with great labor pains, their bodies strained in slow birth of the hidden child, gently attend her, Ilythia, and favor my prayers." ~ Ovidius Naso, Amores II.14.19-24
> > >
> > >
> > > AUC 790 / 37 CE: Emperor Caligula gives the people a congiarium
> > >
> > > AUC 820 / 67 CE: Flavius Vespasianus captures Jotapata
> > >
> > > AUC 946 / 193 CE: Eemperor Didius Julianus deposed; Septimius Severus recognized as Emperor at Rome
> > >
> > >
> > > Our thought for today is from Democritus, the Golden Sayings 64:
> > >
> > > "The friendship of one wise man is better than that of every fool."
> > >
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66341 From: livia_plauta Date: 2009-06-01
Subject: Fava beans and death (Was:Re: KALEDAE IUNIAE ...)
Salve Julia,
thanks a lot for the info. It seems that favism is indeed not confined to Sardinia. That makes my scenario of occasional deaths linked to fava beans all the more likely.
Literally, the bean of death.

Vale,
Livia

>
> Salvete,
>
> Here is some info from the "American Medical Association Handbook of Poisonous and Injurious Plants:"
>
> "Toxic Part: Seeds, raw or cooked and pollen when inhaled.
>
> Toxin: An antimetabolite, 2,6-diaminopurine; a glycoside, vicine.
>
> Symptoms: In susceptible humans, within a few minutes of inhaling pollen or several hours after eating the beans, an allergic reaction occurs with dizziness, diarrhea, nausea and vomiting, abdominal pain and sheer prostration. Blood appears in the urine, which turns reddish-brown to black. Anemia develops within a few hours or a day. Male children are the most frequently affected and apparently all fatalities have been children."
>
> Favism, the severe hemolytic anemia, occurs only in susceptible individuals who have inherited a deficiency of an enzyme, glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase. This genetic trait occurs among people of the Mediterranean region and among black Africans. Most individuals have this enzyme and are not affected."
>
> Valete,
> Julia
>
>
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Maior" <rory12001@> wrote:
> >
> > Salve Livia:
> > we had this very same exciting discussion (hey we thought so;-) in the CP, and after a bit of research it seems beans were served as funeral food in Greece and Rome. Fava beans were black with cthonic associations and the common bean served, so there it is. It has nothing to do with Favism. If you like I can look through the group and give you the references...
> > valeas
> > Maior
> > >
> > >
> > > Salvete omnes,
> > > reading about fava beans (which are obstinately called just "beans" by our Pontifex maximus, I suddenly thought of a possible reason why they are so often associated with death and the dead.
> > >
> > > The association might be much more concrete than we imagine.
> > >
> > > In Sardinia, a genetic disease called favism is quite widespread. It makes the affected person very strongly allergic to fava beans. A fabic person not only cannot eat fava beans, or even be in the same room with them, but they cannot even eat peas which have been grown near fava beans.
> > > For a fabic person, eating fava beans will, quite literally, cause death.
> > >
> > > I was wondering if there might have been cases of favism also outside Sardinia in ancient Italy. If so, it might have happened now and then that a person eating fava beans "inexplicably" died, contributing to cement the tie between fava and death.
> > >
> > > Optime valete,
> > > Livia
> > >
> > >
> > > > M. Moravius Piscinus cultoribus Deorum et omnibus salutem plurimam dicit: Di vos semper servent.
> > > >
> > > > Hodie est Kalendae Fabariae; haec dies nefastus est: DIE QUINTI TE KALO, IUNO COVELLA : Iunoni Monetae in arce; Fabarici circenses missus.
> > > >
> > > > Fabariae
> > > >
> > > > The name for today's date, the Kalendae Fabariae, comes not from a festival, but instead from an ancient tradition. On this day one is to eat a dish prepared from bean-meal and bacon fat (Macrobius, Saturnalia 1.12.22 and 31). This meal was dedicated to the Goddess Carna and was intended to preserve one's good health (Pliny H. N. 18.117). As it happens, this was the time of year when beans were harvested in Central Italy (Columella, 11.2.20).
> > > >
> > > > "Prayers are offered to this Goddess, for the good preservation of liver, heart, and the other internal organs of our bodies. Her sacrifices are bean-meal and lard, because this is the best food for the nourishment of the body." ~ Macrobius, Saturnalia 1.12.32
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Today celebrates the dedication of five temples at Rome:
> > > >
> > > > AUC 358 / 395 BCE: Temple of Juno Regina, brought from Veii, dedicated on the Aventine Hill.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > AUC 365 / 388 BCE: Temple of Mars dedicated in the Campus Martius.
> > > >
> > > > "Father Mars, You who were not at all deaf to my vows, these men, survivors of the battle, dedicate to You the choicest armour of our victory trophies." ~ Silius Italicus Punica 10.553-54
> > > >
> > > > "This same day is a festival of Mars, whose temple is seen from beyond the Portus Capena." ~Ovidius Naso, Fasti 6.191
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > AUC 409 / 344 BCE: Temple of Juno Moneta dedicated on the Arx.
> > > >
> > > > "The Dictator (L. Furius Camillus) thought it his duty to secure the help of the Gods, and during the actual fighting he vowed a temple to Juno Moneta. On his victorious return to Rome, he resigned his Dictatorship to discharge his vow. The senate ordered two commissioners to be appointed to carry out the construction of that temple in a style commensurate with the greatness of the Roman people, and a site was marked out in the Citadel where the house of M. Manlius Capitolinus had stood." ~ Titus Livius 7.28
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > AUC 494 / 259 BCE: Temple of the Tempestes dedicated near the porta Capena.
> > > >
> > > > "You too, Tempests, were considered worthy of a shrine, after our fleet was almost sunk in Corsican waters." ~ Ovidius Naso, Fasti 6.193
> > > >
> > > > "Thanks be to Neptunus and the Tempestates, for returning me safe home again, my venture a success!" ~ Plautus, Stichus 402
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > AUC 733 / 20 BCE: Temple of Mars Ultor dedicated in the Forum Augusti.
> > > >
> > > > "If, Father, my war is authorized by Vesta's priestess, and whenever I prepare to take divine vengeance, Mars, be by my side and satiate cold steel with guilt's blood, and lend Your favour to the better side. If I am victorious for You I'll build a shrine and call You Ultor, Mars the Avenger." ~ Ovid Fasti 5.573-77
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > AUC 736 / 17 BCE: Ludi Saeculares led by Augustus and Agrippa
> > > >
> > > > Acta Sacrorum Saecularium
> > > >
> > > > A proclamation was sent out asking the populace of Rome to participate. "All Free Men, you are bid to pray and fast. On the Capitolium, before the Temple of Jupiter, and on the Aventine before the temple of Diana (join with) the crowded populace present and for the Gods gather sweet-smelling herbs to offer."
> > > >
> > > > Those who were 25 or older were to convene on the Capitolium. From among those who were younger, two choruses were selected of male and female voices to sing a hymn specially composed for the occasion by Horace. As some rites of the Ludi Saeculares were reserved for women to conduct, a second decree was issued on the Kalendae Fabariae:
> > > >
> > > > "And the edict was issued: The quindecimviri sacris faciundis decree: Since, insofar as it accords with proper custom, and in like manner has been observed in numerous precedents, whenever there has been a rightful cause for public celebration, it has been decided that the mourning of women should be suspended; and since it seems that it is appropriate both to the honor of the gods and to the remembrance of their worship that that should apply to the time of solemn rites and games and that it should be scrupulously observed –therefore we have decided that it is incumbent on us to issue to women a decree by edict, that they should suspend mourning." ~ CIL 6.32323 Lines 110b-14
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > The Ludi Saeculares began soon after Midnight with a nighttime sacrifice to the Moirai in the Campus Martius
> > > >
> > > > "On the following night, on the Campus Martius, next to the Tiber, [the emperor Caesar Augustus sacrificed] according to the Greek rite [nine female lambs to the divine Moirai (Fates) as whole burnt offering; and by the same rite he sacrificed nine female goats as a whole burnt offerings and spoke the following prayer: "Moirai, as it is prescribed for you in the Sibylline books - and for this reason may good fortune attend the Roman people, the Quirites – let sacrifice be made to you with nine female lambs and nine female goats burnt whole for you. I beg you and pray that you may increase the power and majesty of the Roman people, the Quirites, in war and peace; and that the Latins may always be obedient; and that you may grant eternal safety, victory and health to the Roman people, the Quirites; and that you may protect the Roman people, the Quirites, and the legions of the Roman people, the Quirites; and that you may keep safe and make greater the state of the Roman people, the Quirites, and that you may be favorable and propitious to the Roman people], the Quirites, to the collegium of the quindecimviri, to me, to my house, to my household; and that you may accept this sacrifice of nine female lambs and nine female goats, to be burnt whole for you in sacrifice. For these reasons be honoured with the sacrifice of this female lamb, become favourable and propitious to the Roman people, the Quirites, to the collegium of the quindecimviri, to myself, to my house, to my household.
> > > >
> > > > "When the sacrifice was completed, games were celebrated by night on a stage, without the additional construction of a theatre and without the erection of seating. One hundred and ten matrons, who had been designated by decree of the quindecimviri, held sellisternia with two seats set out for Juno and Diana.
> > > >
> > > > "Then the games were celebrated with plays in Latin on a wooden theatre which had been erected on the Campus Martius next to the Tiber, and in the same manner women who were mistresses of households held sellisternia, and the games which had begun to take place at night were not interrupted." ~ CIL 6.32323 Lines 90-110
> > > >
> > > > "Juno Regina, we, one hundred and ten the mothers of the families of the people of Rome, the Quirites, pray You allow what is now beneficial to the people of Rome, the Quirites, may then be made better, and we brides implore You to aid and increase the sovereign power and majesty of the people of Rome, the Quirites, in war and peace, and always to watch over the fame of the Latins. And may You favor the people of Rome, the Quirites, and the legions of the people of Rome, the Quirites, and preserve the republic of the people of Rome, the Quirites, and may You willingly favor and prosper us, our homes, and our families. This is what the one hundred and ten mothers of the families of the people of Rome, the Quirites, we brides of our families, pray, entreat, and implore You to grant." ~ CIL 6.32329. 10 sqq. Acta Sacrorum Saecularium addition
> > > >
> > > > "On the Kalends of June, on the Capitoline Hill, the emperor Caesar Augustus sacrificed a bull to Jupiter Optimus Maximus burnt whole for him, and in the same place Marcus Agrippa sacrificed a second. They spoke a prayer, as follows: "Jupiter Optimus Maximus, as it is prescribed for you in those books –and for this [reason] may good fortune attend the Roman people, the Quirites – let sacrifice be made to you with this fine bull. I beg you and pray." The rest as above. At the sacred vessel were Caesar, Agrippa, Scaevola, Sentius, Lollius, Asinius Gallus, and Rabilis (all the members of the quindecimviri).
> > > >
> > > > "Then the games were celebrated with plays in Latin on a wooden theatre which had been erected on the Campus Martius next to the Tiber, and in the same manner women who were mistresses of households held sellisternia, and the games which had begun to take place at night were not interrupted.
> > > >
> > > > "Then by night, next to the Tiber, the emperor Caesar Augustus made sacrifice to the divine Ilythiae with nine cakes, nine popana, nine phthoes; he spoke the following prayer: "Ilythia, as it is prescribed for you in those books –and for this reason [may every good fortune attend] the Roman people, the Quirites – let sacrifice be made to you with nine popana, nine cakes, nine phthoes. I beg and pray. The rest as above." ~ CIL 6.32323 Lines 103-110; 115-118
> > > >
> > > > "Ilythia. You who are compassionate towards women, who suffer with great labor pains, their bodies strained in slow birth of the hidden child, gently attend her, Ilythia, and favor my prayers." ~ Ovidius Naso, Amores II.14.19-24
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > AUC 790 / 37 CE: Emperor Caligula gives the people a congiarium
> > > >
> > > > AUC 820 / 67 CE: Flavius Vespasianus captures Jotapata
> > > >
> > > > AUC 946 / 193 CE: Eemperor Didius Julianus deposed; Septimius Severus recognized as Emperor at Rome
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Our thought for today is from Democritus, the Golden Sayings 64:
> > > >
> > > > "The friendship of one wise man is better than that of every fool."
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66342 From: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com Date: 2009-06-01
Subject: Posting rules in this Forum, 6/1/2009, 11:45 pm
Reminder from:   Nova-Roma Yahoo! Group
 
Title:   Posting rules in this Forum
 
Date:   Monday June 1, 2009
Time:   11:45 pm - 12:00 am
Repeats:   This event repeats every week until Friday January 1, 2010.
Location:   Rome
Notes:   Praetores omnibus s.d.

Please keep on mind the posting rules defined in the current Edictum de sermone Apr. 24, 2762 GEM-PMA, that you find in the Files section of this Forum, at:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma/files/Edicta%20de%20sermone/

Valete omnes,


Praetores G.E.Marinus and P.M.Albucius
 
Copyright © 2009  Yahoo! Inc. All Rights Reserved | Terms of Service | Privacy Policy
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66343 From: Maior Date: 2009-06-01
Subject: Fava beans and death (Was:Re: KALEDAE IUNIAE ...)
Salvete Livia Juliaque ;
here we go, I've brought my post forward, you can read just about the entire chapter in Google Books, for quick access just type -pythagorean vicia faba - in the Google books search engine. I was mixed up as I believe the flower is black-spotted, anyway the book discusses it in detail, which you and Julia Aquila will enjoy.

"and vicia faba and there is an excellent exerpt from a book: "Plants of Life;Plants of Death" Frederick J.Simoons, University of Wisconsin Press. p.192 begins a chapter called "The color black in the Pythagorean ban" There is adiscussion of the faba, in toto there.
.. The gist seems that the black-spotted vicia
faba minor had chthonic associations, but I don't think lentils, L. culinaris or chickpeas, cicer, or peas, pisum did. And the lima bean Phaesolus lunatus, and P. vulgaris came much later from the Americas."

it's a great discussion in that book, all about beans as funeral food. optime valete
Marca Hortensia Maior

- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "livia_plauta" <livia.plauta@...> wrote:
>
> Salve Maior,
> I'm sorry to dissent, but fava beans are green and have always been green (unlike the carrot, that underwent several colour changes in its career).
> Apparently there's a dark variety, that's still used for some christian rituals. Don't ask me more about that: I discussed the matter during Lemuria with one guy on Facebook (whom I convinced to join NR), and he's the one who said so. Personally I've only ever seen green fava beans.
>
> So the chtonic association is certainly not due to the colour.
>
> Optime vale,
> Livia
>
> >
> > Salve Livia:
> > we had this very same exciting discussion (hey we thought so;-) in the CP, and after a bit of research it seems beans were served as funeral food in Greece and Rome. Fava beans were black with cthonic associations and the common bean served, so there it is. It has nothing to do with Favism. If you like I can look through the group and give you the references...
> > valeas
> > Maior
> > >
> > >
> > > Salvete omnes,
> > > reading about fava beans (which are obstinately called just "beans" by our Pontifex maximus, I suddenly thought of a possible reason why they are so often associated with death and the dead.
> > >
> > > The association might be much more concrete than we imagine.
> > >
> > > In Sardinia, a genetic disease called favism is quite widespread. It makes the affected person very strongly allergic to fava beans. A fabic person not only cannot eat fava beans, or even be in the same room with them, but they cannot even eat peas which have been grown near fava beans.
> > > For a fabic person, eating fava beans will, quite literally, cause death.
> > >
> > > I was wondering if there might have been cases of favism also outside Sardinia in ancient Italy. If so, it might have happened now and then that a person eating fava beans "inexplicably" died, contributing to cement the tie between fava and death.
> > >
> > > Optime valete,
> > > Livia
> > >
> > >
> > > > M. Moravius Piscinus cultoribus Deorum et omnibus salutem plurimam dicit: Di vos semper servent.
> > > >
> > > > Hodie est Kalendae Fabariae; haec dies nefastus est: DIE QUINTI TE KALO, IUNO COVELLA : Iunoni Monetae in arce; Fabarici circenses missus.
> > > >
> > > > Fabariae
> > > >
> > > > The name for today's date, the Kalendae Fabariae, comes not from a festival, but instead from an ancient tradition. On this day one is to eat a dish prepared from bean-meal and bacon fat (Macrobius, Saturnalia 1.12.22 and 31). This meal was dedicated to the Goddess Carna and was intended to preserve one's good health (Pliny H. N. 18.117). As it happens, this was the time of year when beans were harvested in Central Italy (Columella, 11.2.20).
> > > >
> > > > "Prayers are offered to this Goddess, for the good preservation of liver, heart, and the other internal organs of our bodies. Her sacrifices are bean-meal and lard, because this is the best food for the nourishment of the body." ~ Macrobius, Saturnalia 1.12.32
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Today celebrates the dedication of five temples at Rome:
> > > >
> > > > AUC 358 / 395 BCE: Temple of Juno Regina, brought from Veii, dedicated on the Aventine Hill.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > AUC 365 / 388 BCE: Temple of Mars dedicated in the Campus Martius.
> > > >
> > > > "Father Mars, You who were not at all deaf to my vows, these men, survivors of the battle, dedicate to You the choicest armour of our victory trophies." ~ Silius Italicus Punica 10.553-54
> > > >
> > > > "This same day is a festival of Mars, whose temple is seen from beyond the Portus Capena." ~Ovidius Naso, Fasti 6.191
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > AUC 409 / 344 BCE: Temple of Juno Moneta dedicated on the Arx.
> > > >
> > > > "The Dictator (L. Furius Camillus) thought it his duty to secure the help of the Gods, and during the actual fighting he vowed a temple to Juno Moneta. On his victorious return to Rome, he resigned his Dictatorship to discharge his vow. The senate ordered two commissioners to be appointed to carry out the construction of that temple in a style commensurate with the greatness of the Roman people, and a site was marked out in the Citadel where the house of M. Manlius Capitolinus had stood." ~ Titus Livius 7.28
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > AUC 494 / 259 BCE: Temple of the Tempestes dedicated near the porta Capena.
> > > >
> > > > "You too, Tempests, were considered worthy of a shrine, after our fleet was almost sunk in Corsican waters." ~ Ovidius Naso, Fasti 6.193
> > > >
> > > > "Thanks be to Neptunus and the Tempestates, for returning me safe home again, my venture a success!" ~ Plautus, Stichus 402
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > AUC 733 / 20 BCE: Temple of Mars Ultor dedicated in the Forum Augusti.
> > > >
> > > > "If, Father, my war is authorized by Vesta's priestess, and whenever I prepare to take divine vengeance, Mars, be by my side and satiate cold steel with guilt's blood, and lend Your favour to the better side. If I am victorious for You I'll build a shrine and call You Ultor, Mars the Avenger." ~ Ovid Fasti 5.573-77
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > AUC 736 / 17 BCE: Ludi Saeculares led by Augustus and Agrippa
> > > >
> > > > Acta Sacrorum Saecularium
> > > >
> > > > A proclamation was sent out asking the populace of Rome to participate. "All Free Men, you are bid to pray and fast. On the Capitolium, before the Temple of Jupiter, and on the Aventine before the temple of Diana (join with) the crowded populace present and for the Gods gather sweet-smelling herbs to offer."
> > > >
> > > > Those who were 25 or older were to convene on the Capitolium. From among those who were younger, two choruses were selected of male and female voices to sing a hymn specially composed for the occasion by Horace. As some rites of the Ludi Saeculares were reserved for women to conduct, a second decree was issued on the Kalendae Fabariae:
> > > >
> > > > "And the edict was issued: The quindecimviri sacris faciundis decree: Since, insofar as it accords with proper custom, and in like manner has been observed in numerous precedents, whenever there has been a rightful cause for public celebration, it has been decided that the mourning of women should be suspended; and since it seems that it is appropriate both to the honor of the gods and to the remembrance of their worship that that should apply to the time of solemn rites and games and that it should be scrupulously observed –therefore we have decided that it is incumbent on us to issue to women a decree by edict, that they should suspend mourning." ~ CIL 6.32323 Lines 110b-14
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > The Ludi Saeculares began soon after Midnight with a nighttime sacrifice to the Moirai in the Campus Martius
> > > >
> > > > "On the following night, on the Campus Martius, next to the Tiber, [the emperor Caesar Augustus sacrificed] according to the Greek rite [nine female lambs to the divine Moirai (Fates) as whole burnt offering; and by the same rite he sacrificed nine female goats as a whole burnt offerings and spoke the following prayer: "Moirai, as it is prescribed for you in the Sibylline books - and for this reason may good fortune attend the Roman people, the Quirites – let sacrifice be made to you with nine female lambs and nine female goats burnt whole for you. I beg you and pray that you may increase the power and majesty of the Roman people, the Quirites, in war and peace; and that the Latins may always be obedient; and that you may grant eternal safety, victory and health to the Roman people, the Quirites; and that you may protect the Roman people, the Quirites, and the legions of the Roman people, the Quirites; and that you may keep safe and make greater the state of the Roman people, the Quirites, and that you may be favorable and propitious to the Roman people], the Quirites, to the collegium of the quindecimviri, to me, to my house, to my household; and that you may accept this sacrifice of nine female lambs and nine female goats, to be burnt whole for you in sacrifice. For these reasons be honoured with the sacrifice of this female lamb, become favourable and propitious to the Roman people, the Quirites, to the collegium of the quindecimviri, to myself, to my house, to my household.
> > > >
> > > > "When the sacrifice was completed, games were celebrated by night on a stage, without the additional construction of a theatre and without the erection of seating. One hundred and ten matrons, who had been designated by decree of the quindecimviri, held sellisternia with two seats set out for Juno and Diana.
> > > >
> > > > "Then the games were celebrated with plays in Latin on a wooden theatre which had been erected on the Campus Martius next to the Tiber, and in the same manner women who were mistresses of households held sellisternia, and the games which had begun to take place at night were not interrupted." ~ CIL 6.32323 Lines 90-110
> > > >
> > > > "Juno Regina, we, one hundred and ten the mothers of the families of the people of Rome, the Quirites, pray You allow what is now beneficial to the people of Rome, the Quirites, may then be made better, and we brides implore You to aid and increase the sovereign power and majesty of the people of Rome, the Quirites, in war and peace, and always to watch over the fame of the Latins. And may You favor the people of Rome, the Quirites, and the legions of the people of Rome, the Quirites, and preserve the republic of the people of Rome, the Quirites, and may You willingly favor and prosper us, our homes, and our families. This is what the one hundred and ten mothers of the families of the people of Rome, the Quirites, we brides of our families, pray, entreat, and implore You to grant." ~ CIL 6.32329. 10 sqq. Acta Sacrorum Saecularium addition
> > > >
> > > > "On the Kalends of June, on the Capitoline Hill, the emperor Caesar Augustus sacrificed a bull to Jupiter Optimus Maximus burnt whole for him, and in the same place Marcus Agrippa sacrificed a second. They spoke a prayer, as follows: "Jupiter Optimus Maximus, as it is prescribed for you in those books –and for this [reason] may good fortune attend the Roman people, the Quirites – let sacrifice be made to you with this fine bull. I beg you and pray." The rest as above. At the sacred vessel were Caesar, Agrippa, Scaevola, Sentius, Lollius, Asinius Gallus, and Rabilis (all the members of the quindecimviri).
> > > >
> > > > "Then the games were celebrated with plays in Latin on a wooden theatre which had been erected on the Campus Martius next to the Tiber, and in the same manner women who were mistresses of households held sellisternia, and the games which had begun to take place at night were not interrupted.
> > > >
> > > > "Then by night, next to the Tiber, the emperor Caesar Augustus made sacrifice to the divine Ilythiae with nine cakes, nine popana, nine phthoes; he spoke the following prayer: "Ilythia, as it is prescribed for you in those books –and for this reason [may every good fortune attend] the Roman people, the Quirites – let sacrifice be made to you with nine popana, nine cakes, nine phthoes. I beg and pray. The rest as above." ~ CIL 6.32323 Lines 103-110; 115-118
> > > >
> > > > "Ilythia. You who are compassionate towards women, who suffer with great labor pains, their bodies strained in slow birth of the hidden child, gently attend her, Ilythia, and favor my prayers." ~ Ovidius Naso, Amores II.14.19-24
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > AUC 790 / 37 CE: Emperor Caligula gives the people a congiarium
> > > >
> > > > AUC 820 / 67 CE: Flavius Vespasianus captures Jotapata
> > > >
> > > > AUC 946 / 193 CE: Eemperor Didius Julianus deposed; Septimius Severus recognized as Emperor at Rome
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Our thought for today is from Democritus, the Golden Sayings 64:
> > > >
> > > > "The friendship of one wise man is better than that of every fool."
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66344 From: marcushoratius Date: 2009-06-02
Subject: a. d. IV Nonas Iunias: Ludi Saeculares day two
M. Moravius Piscinus cultoribus Deorum et omnibus salutem plurimam dicit: Di vos servent cum vester.

Hodie est ante diem IV Nonas Iuninias; haec dies fastus aterque est: Ludi Saecilares

AUC 736 / 17 BCE: The Ludi Saeculares continue into the second day.

"Four days before the Nones of June (2 June), on the Capitoline Hill, the emperor Caesar Augustus sacrificed a cow to Juno Regina burnt whole for her, and in the same place Marcus Agrippa sacrificed a second, and spoke a prayer as follows: 'Juno Regina, as it is prescribed for you in those books – and for this reason may every good fortune attend the Roman people, the Quirites – let sacrifice be made to you with a fine cow. I beg and pray:[that you may increase the power and majesty of the Roman people, the Quirites, in war and peace; and that the Latins may always be obedient; and that you may grant eternal safety, victory and health to the Roman people, the Quirites; and that you may protect the Roman people, the Quirites, and the legions of the Roman people, the Quirites; and that you may keep safe and make greater the state of the Roman people, the Quirites, and that you may be favorable and propitious to the Roman people], the Quirites, to the collegium of the quindecimviri, to me, to my house, to my household; and that you may accept this sacrifice of nine female lambs and nine female goats, to be burnt whole for you in sacrifice. For these reasons be honoured with the sacrifice of this female lamb, become favourable and propitious to the Roman people, the Quirites, to the collegium of the quindecimviri, to myself, to my house, to my household.']

"Then Marcus Agrippa dictated to the one hundred and ten married women, mistresses of households, who had been commanded to assemble on the Capitoline Hill, the formula of prayer as follows: 'Juno Regina, if there is any better fortune that may attend the Roman people, the Quirites, we one hundred and ten mistresses of households of the Roman people, the Quirites, married women on bended knee, pray that you[bring it about, we beg and beseech that you increase the power and majesty of the Roman people, the Quirites in war and peace; and that the Latins may always be obedient; and that you may grant eternal safety, victory and health to the Roman people, the Quirites; and that you may protect the Roman people, the Quirites, and the legions of the Roman people, the Quirites; and [that you may keep safe and make greater] the state of the Roman people, the Quirites; and that you may be favourable and propitious to the Roman people, the Quirites, to the quindecimviri sacris faciundis, to us, [to our houses, to our households. These are the things that we one hundred and ten mistresses of households of the Roman people, the Quirites, married women on bended knee, pray, beg, and beseech.' At the sacred vessel were Marcus Agrippa...

"Games were held on the previous day [...]

"Then by night, next to the Tiber, the emperor Caesar Augustus sacrificed a pregnant sow, as a whole burnt offering, to Terra Mater, and spoke the following prayer: 'Terra Mater, as it is prescribed for you in those books –and for this reason may every good fortune attend the Roman people, the Quirites – let sacrifice be made to you with a pregnant sow of your own, as a whole burnt offering. I beg and pray.' The rest as above.

"The matrons held a sellsternia on this day in the same manner as on the previous day." ~ CIL 6.32323 Lines 119-138

Id est:

"Juno Regina, we, one hundred and ten the mothers of the families of the people of Rome, the Quirites, pray You allow what is now beneficial to the people of Rome, the Quirites, may then be made better, and we brides implore You to aid and increase the sovereign power and majesty of the people of Rome, the Quirites, in war and peace, and always to watch over the fame of the Latins. And may You favor the people of Rome, the Quirites, and the legions of the people of Rome, the Quirites, and preserve the republic of the people of Rome, the Quirites, and may You willingly favor and prosper us, our homes, and our families. This is what the one hundred and ten mothers of the families of the people of Rome, the Quirites, we brides of our families, pray, entreat, and implore You to grant." ~ CIL 6.32329. 10 sqq. Acta Sacrorum Saecularium addition


AUC 946 / 193 CE: Death of Emperor Didius Julianus

"In a short time Julianus was deserted by all and left alone in the Palace with one of his prefects, Genialis, and with Repentinus, his son-in law. Finally, it was proposed that the imperial power be taken away from Julianus by order of the senate. This was done, and Severus was forthwith acclaimed emperor, while it was given out that Julianus had taken poison. Nevertheless, the senate dispatched a delegation and through their efforts Julianus was slain in the Palace by a common soldier, while beseeching the protection of Caesar, that is to say, Severus."

"He lived fifty-six years and four months. He ruled two months and five days." ~ Historia Augusta, Didius Iulianus 8.6-8; 9.3


Today's thought is from Epictetus, Discourses 1.30.1:

"When you appear before some man of authority, remember that there is another who looks down from above on what passes here, and that it is Him whom you must please rather than this man."
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66345 From: marcushoratius Date: 2009-06-02
Subject: Re: KALEDAE IUNIAE: Carna, Juno Regina, Juno Moneta, Mars, Mars Ulto
M. Moravius C. Petronio s. p. d.

Bonam fortunam; excusationes!

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Gaius Petronius Dexter" <jfarnoud94@...> wrote:
>
> AUC 2712 / 1959 CE: Birth of C. Petronius Dexter. :o)
>
> "Nupta Jovis potuit dubio dare nomina mensi,
> Carnae festa deae datur imae cardinis haec lux,
> Lustra, a me nato, Phoebus bis quina cucurrit."
> CPD
>
> Vale et valete.
> C. Petronius Dexter
>

Edepol, I missed your birthday??? Felices Natalis, Dexter. Hmph, and you are so much younger than I had thought.

Cura ut valeas, Amice
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66346 From: marcushoratius Date: 2009-06-02
Subject: Fava beans and death (Was:Re: KALEDAE IUNIAE ...)
--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "livia_plauta" <livia.plauta@...> wrote:
>
Salua sis, Liuia

I obstinately insist that you are speaking of a different bean than what it would be called in the USA. I recall some nasty, hairy string beans nonna grew that we would call green beans. Then there are the lima beans which can be either green or yellow, but those we called lupini. Fava beans, as we call them in the USA, are similar in shape to lima beans though usually larger, they are a deep brown, towards reddish, with an earthy, meaty flavor. They are not red beans or kidney beans. And "fava" or "fave" we took to mean simply "beans" but used it most often to mean white beans, or what are also called canelli.

Cura ut ualeas et favas gaude

Piscinus


> Salve Maior,
> I'm sorry to dissent, but fava beans are green and have always been green (unlike the carrot, that underwent several colour changes in its career).
> Apparently there's a dark variety, that's still used for some christian rituals. Don't ask me more about that: I discussed the matter during Lemuria with one guy on Facebook (whom I convinced to join NR), and he's the one who said so. Personally I've only ever seen green fava beans.
>
> So the chtonic association is certainly not due to the colour.
>
> Optime vale,
> Livia
>
> >
> > Salve Livia:
> > we had this very same exciting discussion (hey we thought so;-) in the CP, and after a bit of research it seems beans were served as funeral food in Greece and Rome. Fava beans were black with cthonic associations and the common bean served, so there it is. It has nothing to do with Favism. If you like I can look through the group and give you the references...
> > valeas
> > Maior
> > >
> > >
> > > Salvete omnes,
> > > reading about fava beans (which are obstinately called just "beans" by our Pontifex maximus, I suddenly thought of a possible reason why they are so often associated with death and the dead.
> > >
> > > The association might be much more concrete than we imagine.
> > >
> > > In Sardinia, a genetic disease called favism is quite widespread. It makes the affected person very strongly allergic to fava beans. A fabic person not only cannot eat fava beans, or even be in the same room with them, but they cannot even eat peas which have been grown near fava beans.
> > > For a fabic person, eating fava beans will, quite literally, cause death.
> > >
> > > I was wondering if there might have been cases of favism also outside Sardinia in ancient Italy. If so, it might have happened now and then that a person eating fava beans "inexplicably" died, contributing to cement the tie between fava and death.
> > >
> > > Optime valete,
> > > Livia
> > >
> > >
> > > > M. Moravius Piscinus cultoribus Deorum et omnibus salutem plurimam dicit: Di vos semper servent.
> > > >
> > > > Hodie est Kalendae Fabariae; haec dies nefastus est: DIE QUINTI TE KALO, IUNO COVELLA : Iunoni Monetae in arce; Fabarici circenses missus.
> > > >
> > > > Fabariae
> > > >
> > > > The name for today's date, the Kalendae Fabariae, comes not from a festival, but instead from an ancient tradition. On this day one is to eat a dish prepared from bean-meal and bacon fat (Macrobius, Saturnalia 1.12.22 and 31). This meal was dedicated to the Goddess Carna and was intended to preserve one's good health (Pliny H. N. 18.117). As it happens, this was the time of year when beans were harvested in Central Italy (Columella, 11.2.20).
> > > >
> > > > "Prayers are offered to this Goddess, for the good preservation of liver, heart, and the other internal organs of our bodies. Her sacrifices are bean-meal and lard, because this is the best food for the nourishment of the body." ~ Macrobius, Saturnalia 1.12.32
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Today celebrates the dedication of five temples at Rome:
> > > >
> > > > AUC 358 / 395 BCE: Temple of Juno Regina, brought from Veii, dedicated on the Aventine Hill.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > AUC 365 / 388 BCE: Temple of Mars dedicated in the Campus Martius.
> > > >
> > > > "Father Mars, You who were not at all deaf to my vows, these men, survivors of the battle, dedicate to You the choicest armour of our victory trophies." ~ Silius Italicus Punica 10.553-54
> > > >
> > > > "This same day is a festival of Mars, whose temple is seen from beyond the Portus Capena." ~Ovidius Naso, Fasti 6.191
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > AUC 409 / 344 BCE: Temple of Juno Moneta dedicated on the Arx.
> > > >
> > > > "The Dictator (L. Furius Camillus) thought it his duty to secure the help of the Gods, and during the actual fighting he vowed a temple to Juno Moneta. On his victorious return to Rome, he resigned his Dictatorship to discharge his vow. The senate ordered two commissioners to be appointed to carry out the construction of that temple in a style commensurate with the greatness of the Roman people, and a site was marked out in the Citadel where the house of M. Manlius Capitolinus had stood." ~ Titus Livius 7.28
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > AUC 494 / 259 BCE: Temple of the Tempestes dedicated near the porta Capena.
> > > >
> > > > "You too, Tempests, were considered worthy of a shrine, after our fleet was almost sunk in Corsican waters." ~ Ovidius Naso, Fasti 6.193
> > > >
> > > > "Thanks be to Neptunus and the Tempestates, for returning me safe home again, my venture a success!" ~ Plautus, Stichus 402
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > AUC 733 / 20 BCE: Temple of Mars Ultor dedicated in the Forum Augusti.
> > > >
> > > > "If, Father, my war is authorized by Vesta's priestess, and whenever I prepare to take divine vengeance, Mars, be by my side and satiate cold steel with guilt's blood, and lend Your favour to the better side. If I am victorious for You I'll build a shrine and call You Ultor, Mars the Avenger." ~ Ovid Fasti 5.573-77
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > AUC 736 / 17 BCE: Ludi Saeculares led by Augustus and Agrippa
> > > >
> > > > Acta Sacrorum Saecularium
> > > >
> > > > A proclamation was sent out asking the populace of Rome to participate. "All Free Men, you are bid to pray and fast. On the Capitolium, before the Temple of Jupiter, and on the Aventine before the temple of Diana (join with) the crowded populace present and for the Gods gather sweet-smelling herbs to offer."
> > > >
> > > > Those who were 25 or older were to convene on the Capitolium. From among those who were younger, two choruses were selected of male and female voices to sing a hymn specially composed for the occasion by Horace. As some rites of the Ludi Saeculares were reserved for women to conduct, a second decree was issued on the Kalendae Fabariae:
> > > >
> > > > "And the edict was issued: The quindecimviri sacris faciundis decree: Since, insofar as it accords with proper custom, and in like manner has been observed in numerous precedents, whenever there has been a rightful cause for public celebration, it has been decided that the mourning of women should be suspended; and since it seems that it is appropriate both to the honor of the gods and to the remembrance of their worship that that should apply to the time of solemn rites and games and that it should be scrupulously observed –therefore we have decided that it is incumbent on us to issue to women a decree by edict, that they should suspend mourning." ~ CIL 6.32323 Lines 110b-14
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > The Ludi Saeculares began soon after Midnight with a nighttime sacrifice to the Moirai in the Campus Martius
> > > >
> > > > "On the following night, on the Campus Martius, next to the Tiber, [the emperor Caesar Augustus sacrificed] according to the Greek rite [nine female lambs to the divine Moirai (Fates) as whole burnt offering; and by the same rite he sacrificed nine female goats as a whole burnt offerings and spoke the following prayer: "Moirai, as it is prescribed for you in the Sibylline books - and for this reason may good fortune attend the Roman people, the Quirites – let sacrifice be made to you with nine female lambs and nine female goats burnt whole for you. I beg you and pray that you may increase the power and majesty of the Roman people, the Quirites, in war and peace; and that the Latins may always be obedient; and that you may grant eternal safety, victory and health to the Roman people, the Quirites; and that you may protect the Roman people, the Quirites, and the legions of the Roman people, the Quirites; and that you may keep safe and make greater the state of the Roman people, the Quirites, and that you may be favorable and propitious to the Roman people], the Quirites, to the collegium of the quindecimviri, to me, to my house, to my household; and that you may accept this sacrifice of nine female lambs and nine female goats, to be burnt whole for you in sacrifice. For these reasons be honoured with the sacrifice of this female lamb, become favourable and propitious to the Roman people, the Quirites, to the collegium of the quindecimviri, to myself, to my house, to my household.
> > > >
> > > > "When the sacrifice was completed, games were celebrated by night on a stage, without the additional construction of a theatre and without the erection of seating. One hundred and ten matrons, who had been designated by decree of the quindecimviri, held sellisternia with two seats set out for Juno and Diana.
> > > >
> > > > "Then the games were celebrated with plays in Latin on a wooden theatre which had been erected on the Campus Martius next to the Tiber, and in the same manner women who were mistresses of households held sellisternia, and the games which had begun to take place at night were not interrupted." ~ CIL 6.32323 Lines 90-110
> > > >
> > > > "Juno Regina, we, one hundred and ten the mothers of the families of the people of Rome, the Quirites, pray You allow what is now beneficial to the people of Rome, the Quirites, may then be made better, and we brides implore You to aid and increase the sovereign power and majesty of the people of Rome, the Quirites, in war and peace, and always to watch over the fame of the Latins. And may You favor the people of Rome, the Quirites, and the legions of the people of Rome, the Quirites, and preserve the republic of the people of Rome, the Quirites, and may You willingly favor and prosper us, our homes, and our families. This is what the one hundred and ten mothers of the families of the people of Rome, the Quirites, we brides of our families, pray, entreat, and implore You to grant." ~ CIL 6.32329. 10 sqq. Acta Sacrorum Saecularium addition
> > > >
> > > > "On the Kalends of June, on the Capitoline Hill, the emperor Caesar Augustus sacrificed a bull to Jupiter Optimus Maximus burnt whole for him, and in the same place Marcus Agrippa sacrificed a second. They spoke a prayer, as follows: "Jupiter Optimus Maximus, as it is prescribed for you in those books –and for this [reason] may good fortune attend the Roman people, the Quirites – let sacrifice be made to you with this fine bull. I beg you and pray." The rest as above. At the sacred vessel were Caesar, Agrippa, Scaevola, Sentius, Lollius, Asinius Gallus, and Rabilis (all the members of the quindecimviri).
> > > >
> > > > "Then the games were celebrated with plays in Latin on a wooden theatre which had been erected on the Campus Martius next to the Tiber, and in the same manner women who were mistresses of households held sellisternia, and the games which had begun to take place at night were not interrupted.
> > > >
> > > > "Then by night, next to the Tiber, the emperor Caesar Augustus made sacrifice to the divine Ilythiae with nine cakes, nine popana, nine phthoes; he spoke the following prayer: "Ilythia, as it is prescribed for you in those books –and for this reason [may every good fortune attend] the Roman people, the Quirites – let sacrifice be made to you with nine popana, nine cakes, nine phthoes. I beg and pray. The rest as above." ~ CIL 6.32323 Lines 103-110; 115-118
> > > >
> > > > "Ilythia. You who are compassionate towards women, who suffer with great labor pains, their bodies strained in slow birth of the hidden child, gently attend her, Ilythia, and favor my prayers." ~ Ovidius Naso, Amores II.14.19-24
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > AUC 790 / 37 CE: Emperor Caligula gives the people a congiarium
> > > >
> > > > AUC 820 / 67 CE: Flavius Vespasianus captures Jotapata
> > > >
> > > > AUC 946 / 193 CE: Eemperor Didius Julianus deposed; Septimius Severus recognized as Emperor at Rome
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Our thought for today is from Democritus, the Golden Sayings 64:
> > > >
> > > > "The friendship of one wise man is better than that of every fool."
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66347 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2009-06-02
Subject: Fava beans and death (Was:Re: KALEDAE IUNIAE ...)
Cato Moravio Piscino Liviae Plautae SPD

Salvete.

"Nonna"? You're of Italian descent, Piscinus? You learn something new every day...

Livia, the Christian thingy you mentioned may be that on St. Joseph's day we used to put beans on the altar for some reason, but they weren't black beans they were greenish-whitish...pale green? I don't know why they were put at the altar, but everyone took one and carried it around for good luck after the Mass - my zio Bunny used to have one in his pocket all the time. I *think* these were the same beans nonna used in pasta fazool (pasta e fagioli). This was about a million years ago when I was a kid, and we thought they were the same beans from "Jack and the Beanstalk".


Valete!

Cato


--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "marcushoratius" <MHoratius@...> wrote:
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "livia_plauta" <livia.plauta@> wrote:
> >
> Salua sis, Liuia
>
> I obstinately insist that you are speaking of a different bean than what it would be called in the USA. I recall some nasty, hairy string beans nonna grew that we would call green beans. Then there are the lima beans which can be either green or yellow, but those we called lupini. Fava beans, as we call them in the USA, are similar in shape to lima beans though usually larger, they are a deep brown, towards reddish, with an earthy, meaty flavor. They are not red beans or kidney beans. And "fava" or "fave" we took to mean simply "beans" but used it most often to mean white beans, or what are also called canelli.
>
> Cura ut ualeas et favas gaude
>
> Piscinus
>
>
> > Salve Maior,
> > I'm sorry to dissent, but fava beans are green and have always been green (unlike the carrot, that underwent several colour changes in its career).
> > Apparently there's a dark variety, that's still used for some christian rituals. Don't ask me more about that: I discussed the matter during Lemuria with one guy on Facebook (whom I convinced to join NR), and he's the one who said so. Personally I've only ever seen green fava beans.
> >
> > So the chtonic association is certainly not due to the colour.
> >
> > Optime vale,
> > Livia
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66348 From: Lucius Coruncanius Cato Date: 2009-06-02
Subject: Re: KALEDAE IUNIAE: Carna, Juno Regina, Juno Moneta, Mars, Mars Ulto
L. Coruncanius Cato Petronio Dexter SPD

Felices natalis!!

Di te incolumem custodiant.

--
L. Coruncanius Cato
Aedilis Curulis
Scriba Consulis Hispaniae

--- El lun, 1/6/09, Gaius Petronius Dexter <jfarnoud94@...> escribió:

De: Gaius Petronius Dexter <jfarnoud94@...>
Asunto: [Nova-Roma] Re: KALEDAE IUNIAE: Carna, Juno Regina, Juno Moneta, Mars, Mars Ultor, Tempestes
Para: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Fecha: lunes, 1 junio, 2009 2:55

C. Petronius M. Moravio Piscino Pontifici Maximo et omnibus s.p.d.,

> Hodie est Kalendae Fabariae;

Et natalis meus.

(...)

> Today celebrates the dedication of five temples at Rome:

> AUC 358 / 395 BCE: Temple of Juno Regina, brought from Veii, dedicated on the Aventine Hill.(...)
> AUC 365 / 388 BCE: Temple of Mars dedicated in the Campus Martius.
(...)
> AUC 409 / 344 BCE: Temple of Juno Moneta dedicated on the Arx.
(...)
> AUC 494 / 259 BCE: Temple of the Tempestes dedicated near the porta Capena.
(...)
> AUC 733 / 20 BCE: Temple of Mars Ultor dedicated in the Forum Augusti.
(...)
--------

> AUC 736 / 17 BCE: Ludi Saeculares led by Augustus and Agrippa.
(...)
> AUC 790 / 37 CE: Emperor Caligula gives the people a congiarium
(...)
> AUC 820 / 67 CE: Flavius Vespasianus captures Jotapata
(...)
> AUC 946 / 193 CE: Eemperor Didius Julianus deposed; Septimius Severus recognized as Emperor at Rome.
(...)

AUC 2712 / 1959 CE: Birth of C. Petronius Dexter. :o)

"Nupta Jovis potuit dubio dare nomina mensi,
Carnae festa deae datur imae cardinis haec lux,
Lustra, a me nato, Phoebus bis quina cucurrit."
CPD

Vale et valete.
C. Petronius Dexter


Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66349 From: livia_plauta Date: 2009-06-02
Subject: Fava beans and death (Was:Re: KALEDAE IUNIAE ...)
Salve Piscine,
I looked up fava beans in Wikipedia. See the difference between the italian page (http://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fave) and the english one (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vicia_faba).
In the italian page you only see green fava beans. I now realize that probably the dark ones are simply dried fava beans, but I've never seen them in that state, because in Italy and Greece (the two places where they are commonly eaten) they are only used in their fresh state.

Optime vale,
Livia

>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "livia_plauta" <livia.plauta@> wrote:
> >
> Salua sis, Liuia
>
> I obstinately insist that you are speaking of a different bean than what it would be called in the USA. I recall some nasty, hairy string beans nonna grew that we would call green beans. Then there are the lima beans which can be either green or yellow, but those we called lupini. Fava beans, as we call them in the USA, are similar in shape to lima beans though usually larger, they are a deep brown, towards reddish, with an earthy, meaty flavor. They are not red beans or kidney beans. And "fava" or "fave" we took to mean simply "beans" but used it most often to mean white beans, or what are also called canelli.
>
> Cura ut ualeas et favas gaude
>
> Piscinus
>
>
> > Salve Maior,
> > I'm sorry to dissent, but fava beans are green and have always been green (unlike the carrot, that underwent several colour changes in its career).
> > Apparently there's a dark variety, that's still used for some christian rituals. Don't ask me more about that: I discussed the matter during Lemuria with one guy on Facebook (whom I convinced to join NR), and he's the one who said so. Personally I've only ever seen green fava beans.
> >
> > So the chtonic association is certainly not due to the colour.
> >
> > Optime vale,
> > Livia
> >
> > >
> > > Salve Livia:
> > > we had this very same exciting discussion (hey we thought so;-) in the CP, and after a bit of research it seems beans were served as funeral food in Greece and Rome. Fava beans were black with cthonic associations and the common bean served, so there it is. It has nothing to do with Favism. If you like I can look through the group and give you the references...
> > > valeas
> > > Maior
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Salvete omnes,
> > > > reading about fava beans (which are obstinately called just "beans" by our Pontifex maximus, I suddenly thought of a possible reason why they are so often associated with death and the dead.
> > > >
> > > > The association might be much more concrete than we imagine.
> > > >
> > > > In Sardinia, a genetic disease called favism is quite widespread. It makes the affected person very strongly allergic to fava beans. A fabic person not only cannot eat fava beans, or even be in the same room with them, but they cannot even eat peas which have been grown near fava beans.
> > > > For a fabic person, eating fava beans will, quite literally, cause death.
> > > >
> > > > I was wondering if there might have been cases of favism also outside Sardinia in ancient Italy. If so, it might have happened now and then that a person eating fava beans "inexplicably" died, contributing to cement the tie between fava and death.
> > > >
> > > > Optime valete,
> > > > Livia
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > M. Moravius Piscinus cultoribus Deorum et omnibus salutem plurimam dicit: Di vos semper servent.
> > > > >
> > > > > Hodie est Kalendae Fabariae; haec dies nefastus est: DIE QUINTI TE KALO, IUNO COVELLA : Iunoni Monetae in arce; Fabarici circenses missus.
> > > > >
> > > > > Fabariae
> > > > >
> > > > > The name for today's date, the Kalendae Fabariae, comes not from a festival, but instead from an ancient tradition. On this day one is to eat a dish prepared from bean-meal and bacon fat (Macrobius, Saturnalia 1.12.22 and 31). This meal was dedicated to the Goddess Carna and was intended to preserve one's good health (Pliny H. N. 18.117). As it happens, this was the time of year when beans were harvested in Central Italy (Columella, 11.2.20).
> > > > >
> > > > > "Prayers are offered to this Goddess, for the good preservation of liver, heart, and the other internal organs of our bodies. Her sacrifices are bean-meal and lard, because this is the best food for the nourishment of the body." ~ Macrobius, Saturnalia 1.12.32
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Today celebrates the dedication of five temples at Rome:
> > > > >
> > > > > AUC 358 / 395 BCE: Temple of Juno Regina, brought from Veii, dedicated on the Aventine Hill.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > AUC 365 / 388 BCE: Temple of Mars dedicated in the Campus Martius.
> > > > >
> > > > > "Father Mars, You who were not at all deaf to my vows, these men, survivors of the battle, dedicate to You the choicest armour of our victory trophies." ~ Silius Italicus Punica 10.553-54
> > > > >
> > > > > "This same day is a festival of Mars, whose temple is seen from beyond the Portus Capena." ~Ovidius Naso, Fasti 6.191
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > AUC 409 / 344 BCE: Temple of Juno Moneta dedicated on the Arx.
> > > > >
> > > > > "The Dictator (L. Furius Camillus) thought it his duty to secure the help of the Gods, and during the actual fighting he vowed a temple to Juno Moneta. On his victorious return to Rome, he resigned his Dictatorship to discharge his vow. The senate ordered two commissioners to be appointed to carry out the construction of that temple in a style commensurate with the greatness of the Roman people, and a site was marked out in the Citadel where the house of M. Manlius Capitolinus had stood." ~ Titus Livius 7.28
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > AUC 494 / 259 BCE: Temple of the Tempestes dedicated near the porta Capena.
> > > > >
> > > > > "You too, Tempests, were considered worthy of a shrine, after our fleet was almost sunk in Corsican waters." ~ Ovidius Naso, Fasti 6.193
> > > > >
> > > > > "Thanks be to Neptunus and the Tempestates, for returning me safe home again, my venture a success!" ~ Plautus, Stichus 402
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > AUC 733 / 20 BCE: Temple of Mars Ultor dedicated in the Forum Augusti.
> > > > >
> > > > > "If, Father, my war is authorized by Vesta's priestess, and whenever I prepare to take divine vengeance, Mars, be by my side and satiate cold steel with guilt's blood, and lend Your favour to the better side. If I am victorious for You I'll build a shrine and call You Ultor, Mars the Avenger." ~ Ovid Fasti 5.573-77
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > AUC 736 / 17 BCE: Ludi Saeculares led by Augustus and Agrippa
> > > > >
> > > > > Acta Sacrorum Saecularium
> > > > >
> > > > > A proclamation was sent out asking the populace of Rome to participate. "All Free Men, you are bid to pray and fast. On the Capitolium, before the Temple of Jupiter, and on the Aventine before the temple of Diana (join with) the crowded populace present and for the Gods gather sweet-smelling herbs to offer."
> > > > >
> > > > > Those who were 25 or older were to convene on the Capitolium. From among those who were younger, two choruses were selected of male and female voices to sing a hymn specially composed for the occasion by Horace. As some rites of the Ludi Saeculares were reserved for women to conduct, a second decree was issued on the Kalendae Fabariae:
> > > > >
> > > > > "And the edict was issued: The quindecimviri sacris faciundis decree: Since, insofar as it accords with proper custom, and in like manner has been observed in numerous precedents, whenever there has been a rightful cause for public celebration, it has been decided that the mourning of women should be suspended; and since it seems that it is appropriate both to the honor of the gods and to the remembrance of their worship that that should apply to the time of solemn rites and games and that it should be scrupulously observed –therefore we have decided that it is incumbent on us to issue to women a decree by edict, that they should suspend mourning." ~ CIL 6.32323 Lines 110b-14
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > The Ludi Saeculares began soon after Midnight with a nighttime sacrifice to the Moirai in the Campus Martius
> > > > >
> > > > > "On the following night, on the Campus Martius, next to the Tiber, [the emperor Caesar Augustus sacrificed] according to the Greek rite [nine female lambs to the divine Moirai (Fates) as whole burnt offering; and by the same rite he sacrificed nine female goats as a whole burnt offerings and spoke the following prayer: "Moirai, as it is prescribed for you in the Sibylline books - and for this reason may good fortune attend the Roman people, the Quirites – let sacrifice be made to you with nine female lambs and nine female goats burnt whole for you. I beg you and pray that you may increase the power and majesty of the Roman people, the Quirites, in war and peace; and that the Latins may always be obedient; and that you may grant eternal safety, victory and health to the Roman people, the Quirites; and that you may protect the Roman people, the Quirites, and the legions of the Roman people, the Quirites; and that you may keep safe and make greater the state of the Roman people, the Quirites, and that you may be favorable and propitious to the Roman people], the Quirites, to the collegium of the quindecimviri, to me, to my house, to my household; and that you may accept this sacrifice of nine female lambs and nine female goats, to be burnt whole for you in sacrifice. For these reasons be honoured with the sacrifice of this female lamb, become favourable and propitious to the Roman people, the Quirites, to the collegium of the quindecimviri, to myself, to my house, to my household.
> > > > >
> > > > > "When the sacrifice was completed, games were celebrated by night on a stage, without the additional construction of a theatre and without the erection of seating. One hundred and ten matrons, who had been designated by decree of the quindecimviri, held sellisternia with two seats set out for Juno and Diana.
> > > > >
> > > > > "Then the games were celebrated with plays in Latin on a wooden theatre which had been erected on the Campus Martius next to the Tiber, and in the same manner women who were mistresses of households held sellisternia, and the games which had begun to take place at night were not interrupted." ~ CIL 6.32323 Lines 90-110
> > > > >
> > > > > "Juno Regina, we, one hundred and ten the mothers of the families of the people of Rome, the Quirites, pray You allow what is now beneficial to the people of Rome, the Quirites, may then be made better, and we brides implore You to aid and increase the sovereign power and majesty of the people of Rome, the Quirites, in war and peace, and always to watch over the fame of the Latins. And may You favor the people of Rome, the Quirites, and the legions of the people of Rome, the Quirites, and preserve the republic of the people of Rome, the Quirites, and may You willingly favor and prosper us, our homes, and our families. This is what the one hundred and ten mothers of the families of the people of Rome, the Quirites, we brides of our families, pray, entreat, and implore You to grant." ~ CIL 6.32329. 10 sqq. Acta Sacrorum Saecularium addition
> > > > >
> > > > > "On the Kalends of June, on the Capitoline Hill, the emperor Caesar Augustus sacrificed a bull to Jupiter Optimus Maximus burnt whole for him, and in the same place Marcus Agrippa sacrificed a second. They spoke a prayer, as follows: "Jupiter Optimus Maximus, as it is prescribed for you in those books –and for this [reason] may good fortune attend the Roman people, the Quirites – let sacrifice be made to you with this fine bull. I beg you and pray." The rest as above. At the sacred vessel were Caesar, Agrippa, Scaevola, Sentius, Lollius, Asinius Gallus, and Rabilis (all the members of the quindecimviri).
> > > > >
> > > > > "Then the games were celebrated with plays in Latin on a wooden theatre which had been erected on the Campus Martius next to the Tiber, and in the same manner women who were mistresses of households held sellisternia, and the games which had begun to take place at night were not interrupted.
> > > > >
> > > > > "Then by night, next to the Tiber, the emperor Caesar Augustus made sacrifice to the divine Ilythiae with nine cakes, nine popana, nine phthoes; he spoke the following prayer: "Ilythia, as it is prescribed for you in those books –and for this reason [may every good fortune attend] the Roman people, the Quirites – let sacrifice be made to you with nine popana, nine cakes, nine phthoes. I beg and pray. The rest as above." ~ CIL 6.32323 Lines 103-110; 115-118
> > > > >
> > > > > "Ilythia. You who are compassionate towards women, who suffer with great labor pains, their bodies strained in slow birth of the hidden child, gently attend her, Ilythia, and favor my prayers." ~ Ovidius Naso, Amores II.14.19-24
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > AUC 790 / 37 CE: Emperor Caligula gives the people a congiarium
> > > > >
> > > > > AUC 820 / 67 CE: Flavius Vespasianus captures Jotapata
> > > > >
> > > > > AUC 946 / 193 CE: Eemperor Didius Julianus deposed; Septimius Severus recognized as Emperor at Rome
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Our thought for today is from Democritus, the Golden Sayings 64:
> > > > >
> > > > > "The friendship of one wise man is better than that of every fool."
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66350 From: kzaikov Date: 2009-06-02
Subject: In attention of all nova romans from Bulgaria
Salve Bulgarians NR! Welcom to http://groups.yahoo.com/group/MoesiaNR/
The Bulgarian chat room in Nova Roma.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66351 From: livia_plauta Date: 2009-06-02
Subject: Fava beans and death (Was:Re: KALEDAE IUNIAE ...)
Livia Catoni sal.
Thanks for the description. This must be the ritual that guy was talking about. Your fava beans sound like the normal ones I know.
They are not the same used in pasta e fagioli (for that one would use american beans). Fava beans are typically quite bitter: it takes great culinary skill to make something edible out of them.

Vale,
Livia

>
> Cato Moravio Piscino Liviae Plautae SPD
>
> Salvete.
>
> "Nonna"? You're of Italian descent, Piscinus? You learn something new every day...
>
> Livia, the Christian thingy you mentioned may be that on St. Joseph's day we used to put beans on the altar for some reason, but they weren't black beans they were greenish-whitish...pale green? I don't know why they were put at the altar, but everyone took one and carried it around for good luck after the Mass - my zio Bunny used to have one in his pocket all the time. I *think* these were the same beans nonna used in pasta fazool (pasta e fagioli). This was about a million years ago when I was a kid, and we thought they were the same beans from "Jack and the Beanstalk".
>
>
> Valete!
>
> Cato
>
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "marcushoratius" <MHoratius@> wrote:
> >
> > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "livia_plauta" <livia.plauta@> wrote:
> > >
> > Salua sis, Liuia
> >
> > I obstinately insist that you are speaking of a different bean than what it would be called in the USA. I recall some nasty, hairy string beans nonna grew that we would call green beans. Then there are the lima beans which can be either green or yellow, but those we called lupini. Fava beans, as we call them in the USA, are similar in shape to lima beans though usually larger, they are a deep brown, towards reddish, with an earthy, meaty flavor. They are not red beans or kidney beans. And "fava" or "fave" we took to mean simply "beans" but used it most often to mean white beans, or what are also called canelli.
> >
> > Cura ut ualeas et favas gaude
> >
> > Piscinus
> >
> >
> > > Salve Maior,
> > > I'm sorry to dissent, but fava beans are green and have always been green (unlike the carrot, that underwent several colour changes in its career).
> > > Apparently there's a dark variety, that's still used for some christian rituals. Don't ask me more about that: I discussed the matter during Lemuria with one guy on Facebook (whom I convinced to join NR), and he's the one who said so. Personally I've only ever seen green fava beans.
> > >
> > > So the chtonic association is certainly not due to the colour.
> > >
> > > Optime vale,
> > > Livia
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66352 From: Maior Date: 2009-06-02
Subject: Fava beans and death (Was:Re: KALEDAE IUNIAE ...)
-Maior Liviae sal;
Simoons says the Bronze age fava bean,, vicia faba, was different, I believe brown and tiny with a blackish seed coat. The flower has black spots on it. And he produces ancient reports that these black spots were seen as marks of ill omen. (p.213)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vicia_faba

try looking up lens escullenta, L. Culinaris (lentils), Pisum Arvense (field peas), Lathyrus Sativus (grass pea) and cicer arietium (chickpeas) all indigenous during Roman times.

the trade with the Americas brought to Italy the Phaeseolus Vulgaris, common green beans and P. lunatus - lima beans

the next chapter in the book is all about favism too.
vale
Maior


> Thanks for the description. This must be the ritual that guy was talking about. Your fava beans sound like the normal ones I know.
> They are not the same used in pasta e fagioli (for that one would use american beans). Fava beans are typically quite bitter: it takes great culinary skill to make something edible out of them.
>
> Vale,
> Livia
>
> >
> > Cato Moravio Piscino Liviae Plautae SPD
> >
> > Salvete.
> >
> > "Nonna"? You're of Italian descent, Piscinus? You learn something new every day...
> >
> > Livia, the Christian thingy you mentioned may be that on St. Joseph's day we used to put beans on the altar for some reason, but they weren't black beans they were greenish-whitish...pale green? I don't know why they were put at the altar, but everyone took one and carried it around for good luck after the Mass - my zio Bunny used to have one in his pocket all the time. I *think* these were the same beans nonna used in pasta fazool (pasta e fagioli). This was about a million years ago when I was a kid, and we thought they were the same beans from "Jack and the Beanstalk".
> >
> >
> > Valete!
> >
> > Cato
> >
> >
> > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "marcushoratius" <MHoratius@> wrote:
> > >
> > > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "livia_plauta" <livia.plauta@> wrote:
> > > >
> > > Salua sis, Liuia
> > >
> > > I obstinately insist that you are speaking of a different bean than what it would be called in the USA. I recall some nasty, hairy string beans nonna grew that we would call green beans. Then there are the lima beans which can be either green or yellow, but those we called lupini. Fava beans, as we call them in the USA, are similar in shape to lima beans though usually larger, they are a deep brown, towards reddish, with an earthy, meaty flavor. They are not red beans or kidney beans. And "fava" or "fave" we took to mean simply "beans" but used it most often to mean white beans, or what are also called canelli.
> > >
> > > Cura ut ualeas et favas gaude
> > >
> > > Piscinus
> > >
> > >
> > > > Salve Maior,
> > > > I'm sorry to dissent, but fava beans are green and have always been green (unlike the carrot, that underwent several colour changes in its career).
> > > > Apparently there's a dark variety, that's still used for some christian rituals. Don't ask me more about that: I discussed the matter during Lemuria with one guy on Facebook (whom I convinced to join NR), and he's the one who said so. Personally I've only ever seen green fava beans.
> > > >
> > > > So the chtonic association is certainly not due to the colour.
> > > >
> > > > Optime vale,
> > > > Livia
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66353 From: M.C.C. Date: 2009-06-03
Subject: END OF VOTATION TIME
M. Curiatius Complutensis Cos omnes civibus Novae Romae S·P·D·

In a few minutes, at 17:00 CET, the votation time ends.

Thanks to all of you who have partecipate in this election.

Curate ut valeatis
--
M. Curiatius Complutensis
Consul

COMMENTARIOLA HISPANIAE

↑ Grab this Headline Animator

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66354 From: Gaius Petronius Dexter Date: 2009-06-03
Subject: Re: KALEDAE IUNIAE: Carna, Juno Regina, Juno Moneta, Mars, Mars Ulto
C. Petronius M. Moravio s. p. d.,

> Bonam fortunam; excusationes!

Maximas gratias!

> Edepol, I missed your birthday??? Felices Natalis, Dexter.

Thank you very much. I had a good day (fortunately it was a public holiday in France) and I honoured my Genius with the Latin poem that I composed. Because of the day I am born, the 1st of June 1959/2712 was also a Monday, like this time... "justus rerum ordo".

> Hmph, and you are so much younger than I had thought.

So kindly. :o)

> Cura ut valeas, Amice

Et tu, amice.

Vale.
C. Petronius Dexter
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66355 From: Gaius Petronius Dexter Date: 2009-06-03
Subject: Re: KALEDAE IUNIAE: Carna, Juno Regina, Juno Moneta, Mars, Mars Ulto
C. Petronius Dexter L. Coruncanio Catoni s.p.d.,

> Felices natalis!!

Maximas gratias! Hae Kalendae Iuniae mihi faustae et felices fuerunt. Nunc alterum dimidium saeculum aetatis meae incipio.

[Thank you very much! Those Kalends of June were auspicious and happy to me. Now I begin the second half a century of my life.]

Vale, Cato optime!

C. Petronius Dexter
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66356 From: marcushoratius Date: 2009-06-03
Subject: a. d. III Nonas Iunias: Bellona; Ludi Saeculares day three
M. Moravius Piscinus cultoribus Deorum et omnibus salutem plurimam dicit: Bellona consilia communicet cum nos.

Hodie est ante diem III Nonas Iunonias; haec dies comitialis est: sacra Bellonae

AUC 457 / 296 BCE: Temple of Bellona vowed; it became the place where declarations of war were posted in the Campus Martius.

"If today, Bellona, You grant us victory, a new temple I vow." ~ Titus Livius 10.19.17-18

Appius Claudius vowed a temple for Bellona during a war with the Etruscans. The date of its dedication is not known. There was a tradition that an earlier Appius Claudius, consul in 495 BCE had dedicated statues of his ancestors in a temple of Bellona (Pliny, H. N. 35.12). At the very least, it would seem that this Sabine Goddess may have been brought to Rome by the Claudii. She was at times explained as sister of Mars. At other times She appears as though She were wife of Mars, and some have suggested She replaced or absorbed the earlier Nerio. In the Imperial era She became assimilated with an Oriental War Goddess of the same name. The Oriental Bellona was sometimes identified with the Magna Mater. Her eastern priests performed a sword dance for Bellona in which they scored one another and flailed their blood about as they whirled.

A legend said that during the war with Pyrrhus of Epirus the fetiales of Rome were unable to perform the traditional ritual for declaring war because Pyrrhus had no land in Italy on which to cast a spear. Thus the Romans captured an Epiroite soldier and forced him to buy a plot of land in front of the Temple of Bellona. From then afterwards a fetialis would cast his iron spear from the columella onto this "foreign" land. (Livy 1.32.12; Ovid, Fasti 6.205 ff) As the Temple lay outside the pomoerium, Bellona's aedes became the preferred location for Roman generals to meet with foreign ambassadors since a Consul still under arms could not enter the City.

Plutarch, Roman Questions 43

"Why do the ambassadors to Rome, from whatever country they come, proceed to the Temple of Saturnus and register with the praefect of the treasury? Is it because Saturnus was a foreigner, and consequently takes pleasure in foreigners, or is the solution of this question also to be found in history? For it seems that in early days the treasurers used to send gifts to ambassadors, which were called lautia, and cared for the ambassadors when they were sick, and buried them at public expense if they died; but now, owing to the great number of embassies that come, this expensive practice has been discontinued; yet there still remains the preliminary meeting with the praefectus of the treasury in the guise of registration."


AUC 736 / 17 BCE: Ludi Saeculares continued into the third day

"Three days before the Nones of June (3 June), on the Palatine, the emperor Caesar Augustus and Marcus Agrippa made sacrifice [to Apollo and Diana with nine cakes,] nine popana, nine phthoes and they spoke a [prayer] as follows: 'Apollo, as it is prescribed for you in those books – and for this reason may every good fortune attend the Roman people, the Quiries – let sacrifice be made to you with nine popana, and nine cakes, and nine phthoes. I beg and pray.' The rest as above. 'Apollo, just as I have offered popana and prayed to you with proper prayer, for this same reason be honoured with these sacrificial cakes. Become favourable and propitious.' The same was said concerning the phthoes. To Diana in the same words.

"When the sacrifice was completed, the twenty-seven boys, who had been commanded, their fathers and mothers still living, and the same number of girls, sang the hymn. And in the same manner on the Capitoline. The hymn was composed by Quintus Horatius Flaccus. The quindecimviri were present: the emperor Caesar, Marcus Agrippa, Quintus Lepidus, Potitus Messalla, Caius Stolo, Caius Scaevola, Caius Sosius, Caius Norbanus, Marcus Cocceius, Marcus Lollius, Caius Sentius, Marcus Strigo, Lucius Arruntius, Caius Asinius, Marcus Marcellus, Decimus Laelius, Quintus Tubero, Caius Rebilus, Messalla Messallinus.

"When the theatrical games had ended at the [Â…] hour, close by that place where sacrifice had been made on the previous nights and a theatre had been set up and a stage, turning posts were set up and chariot racing was presented; Potitus Mesalla presented trick riders." ~ CIL 6.32323 Lines 139-154


Our thought for today is from Sextus 27:

"You should not possess more than the use of the body requires."
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66357 From: Maior Date: 2009-06-03
Subject: Re: KALEDAE IUNIAE: Carna, Juno Regina, Juno Moneta, Mars, Mars Ulto
M. Hortensia G.Petronio spd:
felicem natalis Dextro! naturally it should be a public holiday for
noster arbitor elegantium.

I'll raise a glass of wine to salute your genius tonight and may the gods favour you!
would you post the poem as well?
di te ament!
Maior
>
> C. Petronius M. Moravio s. p. d.,
>
> > Bonam fortunam; excusationes!
>
> Maximas gratias!
>
> > Edepol, I missed your birthday??? Felices Natalis, Dexter.
>
> Thank you very much. I had a good day (fortunately it was a public holiday in France) and I honoured my Genius with the Latin poem that I composed. Because of the day I am born, the 1st of June 1959/2712 was also a Monday, like this time... "justus rerum ordo".
>
> > Hmph, and you are so much younger than I had thought.
>
> So kindly. :o)
>
> > Cura ut valeas, Amice
>
> Et tu, amice.
>
> Vale.
> C. Petronius Dexter
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66358 From: marcushoratius Date: 2009-06-04
Subject: Pridie Nonas Iunias: Hercules; Ludi Saeculares day four
M. Moravius Piscinus cultoribus Deorum et omnibus salutem plurimam dicit: Hercules virtutem in nos addat.

Hodie est die pristine Nonas Iunias; haec dies comitialis est: Herculi Custodi

AUC 283 / 470 BCE: Birth of Socrates

"His (Socrates') formula for prayer was simple: 'Give me that which is best for me,' for, said he, the Gods know best what good things are - to pray for gold or silver or despotic power were no better than to make some particular throw at dice or stake in battle or any such thing the subject of prayer, of which the future consequences are manifestly uncertain." ~ Xenophon, Memorabilia 1.3


AUC 535 / 218 BCE: Dedication of the Temple of Hercules Magnus Custos in the Circus Flaminius

AUC 671 / 82 BCE: Dedication of the Temple of Hercules Custus near the Circus Flaminius.

"Hercules, Founder of our city, You who are called Alcidus, in whose footsteps we now reside on this hallowed earth, avert the threatening storms from our land." ~ Silius Italicus Punica 1.505-7

"Why not arouse yourself, Hercules, to come and to graciously honour these feats of the festival we hold in your name; whether to split the clouds with your discus, or send your javelin speeding more swiftly than Zephyrs, or whether it please you to lock arms in a Libyan wrestling competition, indulge our ceremonies with your divine presence." ~ Statius, Silvae 3.1.154-158

Plutarch, Roman Questions 90:

"Why is it that, when the sacrifice to Hercules takes place, they mention by name no other God, and why is a dog never seen within His enclosure, as Varro recorded? Do they make mention of no other God because they regard Hercules as a demigod? But, as some relate, even while He was still on earth, Evander erected an altar to Him and brought Him sacrifice. And of all animals he contended most with a dog, for it is a fact that this beast always gave Him much trouble, Cerebus, for instance. And, to crown all, when Oeonus, Licymnius' son, had been murdered by the sons of Hippocoon because of a dog, Hercules was compelled to engage in battle with them, and lost many of His friends and His brother Iphicles."


AUC 736 / 17 BCE: The Ludi Saeculares continued into the fourth day.

There is a gap in the Acta Sacrorum Saecularium Celebratorum on what exactly was performed on 4 June. However an edict was issued either on the third or forth extending the Ludi:

"And an edict was issued in the following words: The quindecimviri sacris faciundis decree: We have added seven extra days of games to the holy rites of the games, and we shall commence them on the Nones of June (5 June) with plays in Latin in the wooden theatre which is next to the Tiber at the second hour; Greek shows in the theatre of Pompey at the third hour; Greek stage plays in the theatre which is in the Circus Flaminius at the fourth hour." ~ CIL 6.32323 Lines 155-8:

Emperor Claudius celebrated the Ludi Saeculares again in 47 CE to mark the 800th anniversary of the Founding of Rome. Domitian celebrated them again in 88 CE, roughly one hundred years after they were instituted by Augustus. Then in 204 CE Severus marked the second hundredth years and in 248 CE Philippus again celebrated the Ludi Saeculares.

From the fifth century we get a description of later events.

"Heralds go about summoning everyone to attend a spectacle they have never seen bfore and will never see again. In summer, a few days before it begins, the Quindecemviri sit in the Capitol and in the Palatine temple on a tribunal and distribute purifying agents, such as torches, brimstone and pitch, to the people; slaves do not participate in this, only freemen. When all the people assemble in the above-mentioned places and in the temple of Diana on the Aventine, each one bringing wheat, barley and beans, they keep the all-night vigils to the Fates with great solemnity for [lacuna] nights. Then when the time arrives for the festival, which is celebrated for three days and three nights in the Campus Martius, the victims are dedicated on the bank of the Tiber at Tarentum.

"Therefore, as the [Sibylline] oracle truly says, while all this was observed according to direction, the Roman Empire was safe and Rome remained in control of virtually all the inhabited world, but once this festival was neglected after Diocletian's abdication, the empire gradually collapsed and was imperceptibly barbarized.... From the consulship of Chilo and Libo [204 CE], when Severus celebrated the Secular Games, until Diocletian for the ninth time and Maximian for the eighth were consuls [304 CE], one hundred years elapsed. Maximian wanted to celebrate the festival then, contrary to rule, but next year Diocletian became a private citizen instead of emperor and Maximian followed his example. When Constantine and Licinius were in their third consulship [314 CE], the period of one hundred and ten years had elapsed and they ought to have kept up the traditional festival. By neglecting it, matters were bound to come to their present unhappy state." ~ Zosimus, Historia Nova 2.5.1-2; 2.7.1-2


AUC 957 / 204 CE: The first day of the Ludi Latini et Graeci honorarii


Our thought for today comes from Epicurus, Savran Maxims 5:

"It is impossible to live a pleasant life without living wisely and honorably and justly, and it is impossible to live wisely and honorably and justly without living pleasantly. Whenever any one of these is lacking, when, for instance, the man is not able to live wisely, though he lives honorably and justly, it is impossible for him to live a pleasant life."
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66359 From: Kirsteen Wright Date: 2009-06-04
Subject: The 2,000-year-old gladiator's helmet discovered in Pompeii's ruins
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66360 From: Chantal Gaudiano Date: 2009-06-04
Subject: Re: 2000 year-old gladiator helmet from Pompee
Merule--That helmet is gorgeous! Thank you for sharing the link!

P. Corva
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66361 From: David .C Date: 2009-06-04
Subject: Re: The 2,000-year-old gladiator's helmet discovered in Pompeii's ru
amazing, absalutely beautiful.
 

To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
From: kirsteen.falconsfan@...
Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 18:19:39 +0100
Subject: [Nova-Roma] The 2,000-year-old gladiator's helmet discovered in Pompeii's ruins



Windows Live helps you keep up with all your friends, in one place.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66362 From: marcushoratius Date: 2009-06-05
Subject: NONAE IUNIAE: Dius Fidius
M. Moravius Piscinus cultoribus Deorum et omnibus salutem plurimam dicit: Di vos inculumes custodiant

Hodie est Nonae Iuniae; haec dies nefastus est: Dio Fidio in colle

AUC 287 / 466 BCE: Temple of Semo Sancus dedicated on the Quirinal Hill.

"Because Your hands have purified the Earth, the Sabines of Cures called You Sancus, The Holy One. Hail Father Sancus, whom austere Juno now favors. O Sancus, may You wish to be with me and Your spirit be in my books." ~ Propertius Eligiae 4.9.71-4

The Temple of Semo Sangus (Sancus) was said to have been vowed by Tarquinius Superbus and dedicated by Sp. Postumius on the Quirinal Hill in 466 BCE. However there was an earlier altar within a fanum near this site that had been introduced by Titus Tatius (Dionysius of Halicarnassus 2.49.2; 4.58; 9.60; Varro L. L. 5.74; Livy 8.20.8). His nature was at times described as Dius Fidius; in Greek, Zeus Pistios. The identification of Semo Sancus, a Sabine deity of sowing, as Dius Fidius, a deity of good faith in oaths, would seem to have begun with Aelius Stilo, and was accepted by Verrius (Varro L. L. 5.66; Festus 241). After this identification was well established we find Him called upon in the Imperial Era as Semo Sancus Deus Fidius (CIL 6.568).

Varro tells how a hole pierced the roof of the temple, since, "Some say that it is improper to take an oath by His name when you are under a roof." The same was true of Tutilina and probably other agricultural deities (Plinius Secundus H. N. 18.2). It was in the Temple of Semo Sancus that the Romans stored their oldest treaty, which was between Tarquinius Superbus and the Gabii, made of planks of wood bound by the hide of a sacrificed ox (Dionysius of Halicarnassus 4.58). Also held in His temple was a bronze statue of Gaia Caecilia as she was idealized as the model of "a fair and virtuous woman" (Plutarch, Rom. Ques. 30; i. e.Tanaquil).

Varro also discusses how the name Dius was related to the early name for Jupiter as Diovis, both names referring to the sky. At Iguvium, among the Umbrians, one of their most important deities was Fisiovis Sancius, at times called Fisus. Fisus would seem to be related to Fides, said to have been brought to Rome by Numa Pompilius, if not by Titus Tatius beforehand (Livy 1.21.4). At Iguvium the sacrifice performed for Fisus had his priest don a mandraclo, or double folded white cloth, over his right hand. In similar fashion, for the rite performed for Fides on 1 Oct the flamines maiores bind their right arms from above the elbow to nearly the finger tips. In each case, Umbrian Fisus Sancius, Sabine Semo Sangus, and Roman Dius Fidius there was a strong relation, if not identification, with Jupiter. From Aelius Stilo again there appears an association of Semo Sancus with Hercules as the son of Jupiter (Varro, L. L. 5.66). This was clearly a Greek influence, a syncretism of Heracles with Dius Fidius due to their similar roles as deities by which oaths were sworn and vows made under an open sky. By the time of Tiberius, Ovid was feigning ignorance of Semo Sancus as Hercules was, more and more, taking over His role. Men swore oaths by Semo Sancus, Hercules, Pollux (but not Castor), or by their Genius. Women swore by their Juno (Gellius, Noctes Atticae 11.6.1; Seneca, Epstiles 12.2). Among later Roman scholars therefore Hercules came to be identified as Semo Sancus Dius Fidius.


Plutarch, Roman Questions 28:

"Why do they tell children, whenever they would swear by Hercules, no to do so under a roof, and bid them go out into the open air? Is it, as some relate, because they believe that Hercules had no pleasure in staying in the house, but rejoiced in a life in the open air and a bed under the stars? Or is it rather because Hercules is not one of the native Gods, but a foreigner from afar? For neither do they swear under the roof by Bacchus, since he also is a foreign God if He is from Nysa. Or is this but said in jest to the children and what is done is really a check upon over-readiness and hastiness to swear, as Favorinus stated? For what is done following, as it were, upon preparation produces delay and allows deliberations. Yet one might urge against Favorinus the fact that this custom is not common, but peculiar to Hercules, as may be seen from the legend about him: for it is recorded that he was so circumspect regarding an oath that he swore but once and for Phyleus, the son of Augeas, alone. Wherefore they say that the prophetic priestess also brought up against the Spartans all the oaths they had sworn, saying that it would be better and much more to be desired if they would keep them!"


AUC 736 / 17 BCE: The fifth day of the Ludi Saeculare

"On the Nones of June (5 June), seven extra days of games were commenced: Plays in Latin were given in the wooden theatre; Greek shows in the theatre of Pompey; Greek stage plays in the theatre which is in the Circus Flaminius." ~ CIL 6.32323 Lines 160-161


Our thought for today comes from Marcus Aurelius, Meditations 12.17:

"If it is not right, do not do it: if it is not true, do not say it."
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66363 From: marcushoratius Date: 2009-06-05
Subject: The Comitia Curiata is Called to Assemble
M. Moravius Piscinus Pont. Max. Lictoribus, Curionibus, et omnibus s. p. d.

The Comitia Curiata is called to assemble on dies comitialis XVI Kal. Quin. (16 June) a. AUC MMDCCLXII M. Curiatio M. Iulio consulibus.

The recent elections in the Comitia Populi Tributa chose L. Coruncanius Cato to serve as Aedilis Curulis suffectus. Under the Constitution that office holds imperium. The suffectus shall not be recognized as granted imperium from the Gods until his election can be witnessed in the Comitia Curiata. The Comitia Curiata was unable to meet prior to the conclusion of the assembly of the Comitia Centuriata called by the Consul to elect a Censor suffectus.

Unfortunately, at this time, beginning with the Nones of June, we are in a period of dies nefasti until the end of Vestalia and thus no new assemblies of comitia may meet until the conclusion of feriae Vestalia.

Thus, without imperium, L. Coruncanius Cato cannot yet issue edicta that are binding as law (although he can issue nuntiones to inform the People), and he does not hold a power of veto just yet. He may appoint a staff but he shall be unable to fully take up his duties until his election and imperium are recognized by the Comitia Curiata after 16 June.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66364 From: M.C.C. Date: 2009-06-05
Subject: [Fwd: Report on election results in the Comitia Centuriata.]
M. Curiatius Complutensis Consul omnes civibus Novae Romae SPD

For your knowledge,  Diribitor Suffectus Publius Ullerius Stephanus Venator has sent me this report.

Curate ut valeatis

M. Curiatius Complutensis

-------- Mensaje original --------
Asunto: Report on election results in the Comitia Centuriata.
Fecha: Fri, 5 Jun 2009 06:37:25 -0500
De: P Ullerius Stephanus Venator
Para: M·CVRIATIVS·COMPLVTENSIS, M•IVL• SEVERVS
CC: College of Diribitors and Custodes


Salvete honored Consuls et Avete Colleagues;

Report on election results in the Comitia Centuriata.

Votes were counted according to the procedures set forth in the "Lex
Fabia de ratione comitiorum centuriatorum".

Summary: All three rogationes are approved. Caeso Fabius Buteo
Modianus is chosen as censor suffectus.

Details:

Rogatio Curiatia Iulia de ratione comitiorum centuriatorum:  There
being 5 centuries not voting, 24 centuries are required to win.

30 centuries answer  "Y" ("uti rogas"). 7 centuries answer "N"
("antiquo"). 9 centuries are tied.

Therefore the citizens of Nova Roma, met in the comitia centuriata,
answer "Y" ("uti rogas") to this rogatio at the end of the first
round.

Rogatio Curiatia Iulia de tributo virginum Vestalium:  There being 6
centuries not voting, 23 centuries are required to win.

29 centuries answer "Y" ("uti rogas"). 7 centuries answer "N"
("antiquo"). 9 centuries are tied.

Therefore the citizens of Nova Roma, met in the comitia centuriata,
answer "Y" ("uti rogas") to this rogatio at the end of the first
round.

Rogatio Curiatia Iulia de institutis publicis religiosis:   There
being 5 centuries not voting, 24 centuries are required to win.

Neither position reaching the number 24, ties were broken by lot. As a
result, 28 centuries answer "Y" ("uti rogas"). 18 centuries answer "N"
("antiquo").

Therefore the citizens of Nova Roma, met in the comitia centuriata,
answer "Y" ("uti rogas") to this rogatio at the end of the first
round.

Censor suffectus:  There being 5 centuries not voting, 24 centuries
are required to win.

Neither candidate being the first choice of the required number of
centuries, ties were broken by lot. 17 centuries answered "C. Equitius
Cato", 29 centuries answered "Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus". Therefore
the citizens of Nova Roma, met in the comitia centuriata, select Caeso
Fabius Buteo Modianus as censor suffectus at the end of the first
round.

=========================================
In amicitia et fides -
Publius Ullerius Stephanus Venator
Civis circa Quintilis MMDCCLI a.u.c.
Diribitor Suffectus
(Who with this report had discharged his duties fully.)


--
M. Curiatius Complutensis

COMMENTARIOLA HISPANIAE

↑ Grab this Headline Animator

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66365 From: Titus Flavius Aquila Date: 2009-06-05
Subject: AW: [Nova-Roma] [Fwd: Report on election results in the Comitia Cent
Salvete Quirites,
 
this is excellent news !
 
Congratulations to our Censor Suffectus Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus !

 

Optime valete

Titus Flavius Aquila




Von: M.C.C. <complutensis@gmail.com>
An: "Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com" <Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com>; "NovaRoma-Announce@yahoogroups.com" <NovaRoma-Announce@yahoogroups.com>
Gesendet: Freitag, den 5. Juni 2009, 16:18:24 Uhr
Betreff: [Nova-Roma] [Fwd: Report on election results in the Comitia Centuriata.]

M. Curiatius Complutensis Consul omnes civibus Novae Romae SPD

For your knowledge,  Diribitor Suffectus Publius Ullerius Stephanus Venator has sent me this report.

Curate ut valeatis

M. Curiatius Complutensis

-------- Mensaje original --------
Asunto: Report on election results in the Comitia Centuriata.
Fecha: Fri, 5 Jun 2009 06:37:25 -0500
De: P Ullerius Stephanus Venator
Para: M·CVRIATIVS·COMPLVTENSIS, M•IVL• SEVERVS
CC: College of Diribitors and Custodes


Salvete honored Consuls et Avete Colleagues;

Report on election results in the Comitia Centuriata.

Votes were counted according to the procedures set forth in the "Lex
Fabia de ratione comitiorum centuriatorum".

Summary: All three rogationes are approved. Caeso Fabius Buteo
Modianus is chosen as censor suffectus.

Details:

Rogatio Curiatia Iulia de ratione comitiorum centuriatorum:  There
being 5 centuries not voting, 24 centuries are required to win.

30 centuries answer  "Y" ("uti rogas"). 7 centuries answer "N"
("antiquo"). 9 centuries are tied.

Therefore the citizens of Nova Roma, met in the comitia centuriata,
answer "Y" ("uti rogas") to this rogatio at the end of the first
round.

Rogatio Curiatia Iulia de tributo virginum Vestalium:  There being 6
centuries not voting, 23 centuries are required to win.

29 centuries answer "Y" ("uti rogas"). 7 centuries answer "N"
("antiquo"). 9 centuries are tied.

Therefore the citizens of Nova Roma, met in the comitia centuriata,
answer "Y" ("uti rogas") to this rogatio at the end of the first
round.

Rogatio Curiatia Iulia de institutis publicis religiosis:   There
being 5 centuries not voting, 24 centuries are required to win.

Neither position reaching the number 24, ties were broken by lot. As a
result, 28 centuries answer "Y" ("uti rogas"). 18 centuries answer "N"
("antiquo").

Therefore the citizens of Nova Roma, met in the comitia centuriata,
answer "Y" ("uti rogas") to this rogatio at the end of the first
round.

Censor suffectus:  There being 5 centuries not voting, 24 centuries
are required to win.

Neither candidate being the first choice of the required number of
centuries, ties were broken by lot. 17 centuries answered "C. Equitius
Cato", 29 centuries answered "Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus". Therefore
the citizens of Nova Roma, met in the comitia centuriata, select Caeso
Fabius Buteo Modianus as censor suffectus at the end of the first
round.

=========================================
In amicitia et fides -
Publius Ullerius Stephanus Venator
Civis circa Quintilis MMDCCLI a.u.c.
Diribitor Suffectus
(Who with this report had discharged his duties fully.)


--
M. Curiatius Complutensis

COMMENTARIOLA HISPANIAE

↑ Grab this Headline Animator


Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66366 From: Timothy or Stephen Gallagher Date: 2009-06-05
Subject: Commodum ex iniuria sua nemo habere debet
Salvete  Nova Romans
 
Today is not a good day.
 
It would seem that a majority of voters have chosen to cast a ballot for an individual who can not legally serve as Censor. The electorate can no more change this status as  it could elect me Emperor.
 
I have decided not to allow any illegally elected person to have any of the Censors tools or any shared ownership of the Nova Roman lists which are under the temporary care of the Censors. When my successor is elected in the fall I will turn over all ownership tools and lists to that person who can then decide if they want to share them with a person who can not legally be a Censor. 
 
Come January 1st they can prosecute me until their hearts are content but I will not go quietly.

I will use every legal right I have within Nova Roma to defend my actions as Censor.
 
Each magistrate must conduct themselves according to the laws and the constitution of Nova Roma.  They must also conduct themselves according to the dictates of they own conscience. Allowing  a person to act as Censor, who is ineligible to serve, would be a violation of their Oath of office.

I will not violate mine.

As this is the course I have decided to take any member of the Censors office, who disagrees with it, is free to resign. 
 
Vale
 
Tiberius Galerius Paulinus

Censor
 
Commodum ex iniuria sua nemo habere debet  










Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66367 From: Matt Hucke Date: 2009-06-05
Subject: Re: Commodum ex iniuria sua nemo habere debet
On Fri, 5 Jun 2009, Timothy or Stephen Gallagher wrote:

> I have decided not to allow any illegally elected person to have any of the
> Censors tools

As the hosting provider, I control the password files. I will make any changes to
these that are commanded of me in writing by the consuls.

matt, speaking as sysadmin, not citizen.

--
Matt Hucke (hucke@...), programmer.
author, Graveyards of Illinois - http://graveyards.com/
CYNICO.NET - hosting from $8.33/month; domains $13 - http://cynico.net/
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66368 From: David Kling Date: 2009-06-05
Subject: Oath of Office - Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus
Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus S.P.D.

I, David Oliver Kling - Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus do hereby solemnly swear to uphold the honor of Nova Roma, and to act always in the best interests of the people and the Senate of Nova Roma.

As a magistrate of Nova Roma, I, David Oliver Kling - Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus swear to honor the Gods and Goddesses of Rome in my public dealings, and to pursue the Roman Virtues in my public and private life.

I, David Oliver Kling - Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus swear to uphold and defend the Religio Romana as the State Religion of Nova Roma and swear never to act in a way that would threaten its status as the State Religion.

I, David Oliver Kling - Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus swear to protect and defend the Constitution of Nova Roma.

I, David Oliver Kling - Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus further swear to fulfill the obligations and responsibilities of the office of Censor Suffectus to the best of my abilities.

On my honor as a Citizen of Nova Roma, and in the presence of the Gods and Goddesses of the Roman people and by their will and favor, do I accept the position of Censor Suffectus and all the rights, privileges, obligations, and responsibilities attendant thereto.

Valete:

Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus
Censor - Senator - Pontifex - Augur - Flamen Pomonalis - Lictor
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66369 From: Titus Flavius Aquila Date: 2009-06-05
Subject: AW: [Nova-Roma] Commodum ex iniuria sua nemo habere debet
Salve Censor Paulinus,
 
I deeply regret your decison and ask you to reconsider.
 
It clearly disrespects the majority decision of the citizens of Nova Roma.
 
If you keep your decision up, I will step down as Scriba Censoribus for German applicants.
 
I will wait for Censor Suffectus Modianus taking over his position and will over my service to him.
 
Optime vale
Titus Flavius Aquila
Scriba Censoribus


Von: Timothy or Stephen Gallagher <spqr753@...>
An: Nova-Roma <nova-roma@yahoogroups.com>
Gesendet: Freitag, den 5. Juni 2009, 20:04:02 Uhr
Betreff: [Nova-Roma] Commodum ex iniuria sua nemo habere debet

Salvete  Nova Romans
 
Today is not a good day.
 
It would seem that a majority of voters have chosen to cast a ballot for an individual who can not legally serve as Censor. The electorate can no more change this status as  it could elect me Emperor.
 
I have decided not to allow any illegally elected person to have any of the Censors tools or any shared ownership of the Nova Roman lists which are under the temporary care of the Censors. When my successor is elected in the fall I will turn over all ownership tools and lists to that person who can then decide if they want to share them with a person who can not legally be a Censor. 
 
Come January 1st they can prosecute me until their hearts are content but I will not go quietly.

I will use every legal right I have within Nova Roma to defend my actions as Censor.
 
Each magistrate must conduct themselves according to the laws and the constitution of Nova Roma.  They must also conduct themselves according to the dictates of they own conscience. Allowing  a person to act as Censor, who is ineligible to serve, would be a violation of their Oath of office.

I will not violate mine.

As this is the course I have decided to take any member of the Censors office, who disagrees with it, is free to resign. 
 
Vale
 
Tiberius Galerius Paulinus

Censor
 
Commodum ex iniuria sua nemo habere debet  











Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66370 From: David Kling Date: 2009-06-05
Subject: Re: Commodum ex iniuria sua nemo habere debet
Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus Tiberio Galerio Paulino salutem dicit

It saddens me that you wish to take this course of action.  I am a legally elected censor of Nova Roma, and shall act accordingly.  You might not approve, but in time you will have to come to grips with your decision.  Both the people, through their votes, and Gods, through lots, have given me their blessing.

I am willing to set aside my animosity towards you for the betterment of Nova Roma.

Likewise, any scriba assigned to you who would rather work for me is willing to contact me and I will establish my own cohores and appoint them scriba.

Hopefully, you will reconsider your decision.

Vale:

Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus

On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 2:04 PM, Timothy or Stephen Gallagher <spqr753@...> wrote:


Salvete  Nova Romans
 
Today is not a good day.
 
It would seem that a majority of voters have chosen to cast a ballot for an individual who can not legally serve as Censor. The electorate can no more change this status as  it could elect me Emperor.
 
I have decided not to allow any illegally elected person to have any of the Censors tools or any shared ownership of the Nova Roman lists which are under the temporary care of the Censors. When my successor is elected in the fall I will turn over all ownership tools and lists to that person who can then decide if they want to share them with a person who can not legally be a Censor. 
 
Come January 1st they can prosecute me until their hearts are content but I will not go quietly.

I will use every legal right I have within Nova Roma to defend my actions as Censor.
 
Each magistrate must conduct themselves according to the laws and the constitution of Nova Roma.  They must also conduct themselves according to the dictates of they own conscience. Allowing  a person to act as Censor, who is ineligible to serve, would be a violation of their Oath of office.

I will not violate mine.

As this is the course I have decided to take any member of the Censors office, who disagrees with it, is free to resign. 
 
Vale
 
Tiberius Galerius Paulinus

Censor




Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66371 From: Timothy or Stephen Gallagher Date: 2009-06-05
Subject: Re: Commodum ex iniuria sua nemo habere debet
Salvete Nova Romans
 
It has now been made absurdly clear to me that no matter what a Censor may want or even order it is subject to being over ridden by those who control the "Platform" that Nova Roma uses.
 
The Censors tools are to be given to individuals with the express authorization of the Censor. I guess that applies only to those Censors we agree with.
 
I will now take the weekend to decide what I will do in responce to this turn of events.
 
Valete
 
Tiberius Galerius Paulinus
Censor

 

To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
From: hucke@...
Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2009 13:19:40 -0500
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Commodum ex iniuria sua nemo habere debet



On Fri, 5 Jun 2009, Timothy or Stephen Gallagher wrote:

> I have decided not to allow any illegally elected person to have any of the
> Censors tools

As the hosting provider, I control the password files. I will make any changes to
these that are commanded of me in writing by the consuls.

matt, speaking as sysadmin, not citizen.

--
Matt Hucke (hucke@cynico. net), programmer.
author, Graveyards of Illinois - http://graveyards. com/
CYNICO.NET - hosting from $8.33/month; domains $13 - http://cynico. net/

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66372 From: Matt Hucke Date: 2009-06-05
Subject: Re: Commodum ex iniuria sua nemo habere debet
> It has now been made absurdly clear to me that no matter what a Censor may want
> or even order it is subject to being over ridden by those who control the
> "Platform" that Nova Roma uses.

Those who pay the bills, rather; I won't make any edits of the password file
without the express orders of the consuls.

- matt the server guy

--
Matt Hucke (hucke@...), programmer.
author, Graveyards of Illinois - http://graveyards.com/
CYNICO.NET - hosting from $8.33/month; domains $13 - http://cynico.net/
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66374 From: Q. Valerius Poplicola Date: 2009-06-05
Subject: Re: Commodum ex iniuria sua nemo habere debet
>> I am a legally elected censor of Nova Roma, and shall act accordingly.

See, here's where you're wrong. Your election was not legal, and although you
may act legally as censor, your past actions betray you.

I'm very sorry Nova Roma has brought this upon herself.

Q. Poplicola Flamen Falacer

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Timothy or Stephen Gallagher <spqr753@...> wrote:
>
>
> Salvete Nova Romans
>
>
>
> It has now been made absurdly clear to me that no matter what a Censor may want or even order it is subject to being over ridden by those who control the "Platform" that Nova Roma uses.
>
>
>
> The Censors tools are to be given to individuals with the express authorization of the Censor. I guess that applies only to those Censors we agree with.
>
>
>
> I will now take the weekend to decide what I will do in responce to this turn of events.
>
>
>
> Valete
>
>
>
> Tiberius Galerius Paulinus
>
> Censor
>
>
>
>
>
> To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> From: hucke@...
> Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2009 13:19:40 -0500
> Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Commodum ex iniuria sua nemo habere debet
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Fri, 5 Jun 2009, Timothy or Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>
> > I have decided not to allow any illegally elected person to have any of the
> > Censors tools
>
> As the hosting provider, I control the password files. I will make any changes to
> these that are commanded of me in writing by the consuls.
>
> matt, speaking as sysadmin, not citizen.
>
> --
> Matt Hucke (hucke@...), programmer.
> author, Graveyards of Illinois - http://graveyards.com/
> CYNICO.NET - hosting from $8.33/month; domains $13 - http://cynico.net/
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66376 From: Maior Date: 2009-06-05
Subject: Re: Commodum ex iniuria sua nemo habere debet
M. Hortensia Maior Paulino censoris quiritibus spd;
Pauline, whatever your interpretations or opinions; they are just that - an opinion and not the truth.

This kind of 'I am the possessor of the truth and everyone else is wrong' leads to continuing dysfunctionality. And dictatorship.

We had a full and fair election; the people made their choices and the gods decided the lots. As censor you must respect the gods of Rome and the people. If Cato won it would be exactly the same.

now please, let's stop post election partisan bickering, quarreling and do something real and positive for our community.
bene valete in pacem deorum
M. Hortensia Maior



> >> I am a legally elected censor of Nova Roma, and shall act accordingly.
>
> See, here's where you're wrong. Your election was not legal, and although you
> may act legally as censor, your past actions betray you.
>
> I'm very sorry Nova Roma has brought this upon herself.
>
> Q. Poplicola Flamen Falacer
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Timothy or Stephen Gallagher <spqr753@> wrote:
> >
> >
> > Salvete Nova Romans
> >
> >
> >
> > It has now been made absurdly clear to me that no matter what a Censor may want or even order it is subject to being over ridden by those who control the "Platform" that Nova Roma uses.
> >
> >
> >
> > The Censors tools are to be given to individuals with the express authorization of the Censor. I guess that applies only to those Censors we agree with.
> >
> >
> >
> > I will now take the weekend to decide what I will do in responce to this turn of events.
> >
> >
> >
> > Valete
> >
> >
> >
> > Tiberius Galerius Paulinus
> >
> > Censor
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> > From: hucke@
> > Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2009 13:19:40 -0500
> > Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Commodum ex iniuria sua nemo habere debet
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Fri, 5 Jun 2009, Timothy or Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> >
> > > I have decided not to allow any illegally elected person to have any of the
> > > Censors tools
> >
> > As the hosting provider, I control the password files. I will make any changes to
> > these that are commanded of me in writing by the consuls.
> >
> > matt, speaking as sysadmin, not citizen.
> >
> > --
> > Matt Hucke (hucke@), programmer.
> > author, Graveyards of Illinois - http://graveyards.com/
> > CYNICO.NET - hosting from $8.33/month; domains $13 - http://cynico.net/
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66377 From: David Kling Date: 2009-06-05
Subject: Re: Commodum ex iniuria sua nemo habere debet
Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus Tiberio Galerio Paulino salutem dicit

You wrote:  "The Censors tools are to be given to individuals with the express authorization of the Censor."  You are no longer the sole censor.  You now have a colleague, and you can no longer act alone.  You cannot deny your colleague access to the tools that come with the office.  No more than you could deny access to rogatores, who are also elected by the people to perform censor-like duties.

Vale;

Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus

On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 2:59 PM, Timothy or Stephen Gallagher <spqr753@...> wrote:


Salvete Nova Romans
 
It has now been made absurdly clear to me that no matter what a Censor may want or even order it is subject to being over ridden by those who control the "Platform" that Nova Roma uses.
 
The Censors tools are to be given to individuals with the express authorization of the Censor. I guess that applies only to those Censors we agree with.
 
I will now take the weekend to decide what I will do in responce to this turn of events.
 
Valete
 
Tiberius Galerius Paulinus
Censor




Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66378 From: Lucius Cornelius Cicero Date: 2009-06-05
Subject: Re: Commodum ex iniuria sua nemo habere debet
Ah, but see it's only your opinion that the election was legal.

It's also only your opinion that Pauline's interpretation is only an opinion and not the truth.



--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Maior" <rory12001@...> wrote:
>
> M. Hortensia Maior Paulino censoris quiritibus spd;
> Pauline, whatever your interpretations or opinions; they are just that - an opinion and not the truth.
>
> This kind of 'I am the possessor of the truth and everyone else is wrong' leads to continuing dysfunctionality. And dictatorship.
>
> We had a full and fair election; the people made their choices and the gods decided the lots. As censor you must respect the gods of Rome and the people. If Cato won it would be exactly the same.
>
> now please, let's stop post election partisan bickering, quarreling and do something real and positive for our community.
> bene valete in pacem deorum
> M. Hortensia Maior
>
>
>
> > >> I am a legally elected censor of Nova Roma, and shall act accordingly.
> >
> > See, here's where you're wrong. Your election was not legal, and although you
> > may act legally as censor, your past actions betray you.
> >
> > I'm very sorry Nova Roma has brought this upon herself.
> >
> > Q. Poplicola Flamen Falacer
> >
> > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Timothy or Stephen Gallagher <spqr753@> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > Salvete Nova Romans
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > It has now been made absurdly clear to me that no matter what a Censor may want or even order it is subject to being over ridden by those who control the "Platform" that Nova Roma uses.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > The Censors tools are to be given to individuals with the express authorization of the Censor. I guess that applies only to those Censors we agree with.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > I will now take the weekend to decide what I will do in responce to this turn of events.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Valete
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Tiberius Galerius Paulinus
> > >
> > > Censor
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> > > From: hucke@
> > > Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2009 13:19:40 -0500
> > > Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Commodum ex iniuria sua nemo habere debet
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Fri, 5 Jun 2009, Timothy or Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> > >
> > > > I have decided not to allow any illegally elected person to have any of the
> > > > Censors tools
> > >
> > > As the hosting provider, I control the password files. I will make any changes to
> > > these that are commanded of me in writing by the consuls.
> > >
> > > matt, speaking as sysadmin, not citizen.
> > >
> > > --
> > > Matt Hucke (hucke@), programmer.
> > > author, Graveyards of Illinois - http://graveyards.com/
> > > CYNICO.NET - hosting from $8.33/month; domains $13 - http://cynico.net/
> > >
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66379 From: Maior Date: 2009-06-05
Subject: Re: Commodum ex iniuria sua nemo habere debet
Salve;
not at all. The candidates were approved by the magistrates, the people and the tribunes had plenty of opportunity to legally object. They didn't.

And the people then, and remember, the first centuries composed of Senators voted for Modianus.

So yes, the power lies with the people. If they didn't want K. Fabius Buteo Modianus they would not have voted for him. And the gods decided the ties.
Paulinus is a censor with no imperium. Censors during the Republic made the effort to work with their political enemies for the good of the res publica. I posted it here during the election.
bene vale in pacem deorum
M. Hortensia Maior

>
> Ah, but see it's only your opinion that the election was legal.
>
> It's also only your opinion that Pauline's interpretation is only an opinion and not the truth.
>
>
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Maior" <rory12001@> wrote:
> >
> > M. Hortensia Maior Paulino censoris quiritibus spd;
> > Pauline, whatever your interpretations or opinions; they are just that - an opinion and not the truth.
> >
> > This kind of 'I am the possessor of the truth and everyone else is wrong' leads to continuing dysfunctionality. And dictatorship.
> >
> > We had a full and fair election; the people made their choices and the gods decided the lots. As censor you must respect the gods of Rome and the people. If Cato won it would be exactly the same.
> >
> > now please, let's stop post election partisan bickering, quarreling and do something real and positive for our community.
> > bene valete in pacem deorum
> > M. Hortensia Maior
> >
> >
> >
> > > >> I am a legally elected censor of Nova Roma, and shall act accordingly.
> > >
> > > See, here's where you're wrong. Your election was not legal, and although you
> > > may act legally as censor, your past actions betray you.
> > >
> > > I'm very sorry Nova Roma has brought this upon herself.
> > >
> > > Q. Poplicola Flamen Falacer
> > >
> > > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Timothy or Stephen Gallagher <spqr753@> wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Salvete Nova Romans
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > It has now been made absurdly clear to me that no matter what a Censor may want or even order it is subject to being over ridden by those who control the "Platform" that Nova Roma uses.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > The Censors tools are to be given to individuals with the express authorization of the Censor. I guess that applies only to those Censors we agree with.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > I will now take the weekend to decide what I will do in responce to this turn of events.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Valete
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Tiberius Galerius Paulinus
> > > >
> > > > Censor
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> > > > From: hucke@
> > > > Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2009 13:19:40 -0500
> > > > Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Commodum ex iniuria sua nemo habere debet
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, 5 Jun 2009, Timothy or Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > I have decided not to allow any illegally elected person to have any of the
> > > > > Censors tools
> > > >
> > > > As the hosting provider, I control the password files. I will make any changes to
> > > > these that are commanded of me in writing by the consuls.
> > > >
> > > > matt, speaking as sysadmin, not citizen.
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Matt Hucke (hucke@), programmer.
> > > > author, Graveyards of Illinois - http://graveyards.com/
> > > > CYNICO.NET - hosting from $8.33/month; domains $13 - http://cynico.net/
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66380 From: Matt Hucke Date: 2009-06-05
Subject: Re: Commodum ex iniuria sua nemo habere debet
> It's also only your opinion that Pauline's interpretation is only an opinion and not the truth.

That's only your opinion.

--
Matt Hucke (hucke@...), programmer.
author, Graveyards of Illinois - http://graveyards.com/
CYNICO.NET - hosting from $8.33/month; domains $13 - http://cynico.net/
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66381 From: Lucius Coruncanius Cato Date: 2009-06-05
Subject: Re: Commodum ex iniuria sua nemo habere debet
L. Coruncanius Cato omn. spd.

Welcome to the Marx brothers cabin!

Di vos incolumem custodiant.
--
L. Coruncanius Cato
Aedilis Curulis
Scriba Consulis Hispaniae

--- El sáb, 6/6/09, Matt Hucke <hucke@...> escribió:

De: Matt Hucke <hucke@...>
Asunto: Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: Commodum ex iniuria sua nemo habere debet
Para: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Fecha: sábado, 6 junio, 2009 1:51


> It's also only your opinion that Pauline's interpretation is only an opinion and not the truth.

That's only your opinion.

--
Matt Hucke (hucke@cynico. net), programmer.
author, Graveyards of Illinois - http://graveyards. com/
CYNICO.NET - hosting from $8.33/month; domains $13 - http://cynico. net/


Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66382 From: Timothy or Stephen Gallagher Date: 2009-06-05
Subject: Marx Rules!
Salve Coruncanius cato
 
"Outside of a dog, a book is a man's best friend. Inside of a dog, it is too dark to read." - 
Grouchus Marxus 
 
Vale
 
Paulinus
 

To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
From: l.coruncanius_cato@...
Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2009 23:54:18 +0000
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: Commodum ex iniuria sua nemo habere debet



L. Coruncanius Cato omn. spd.

Welcome to the Marx brothers cabin!

Di vos incolumem custodiant.
--
L. Coruncanius Cato
Aedilis Curulis
Scriba Consulis Hispaniae

--- El sáb, 6/6/09, Matt Hucke <hucke@cynico. net> escribió:

De: Matt Hucke <hucke@cynico. net>
Asunto: Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: Commodum ex iniuria sua nemo habere debet
Para: Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com
Fecha: sábado, 6 junio, 2009 1:51


> It's also only your opinion that Pauline's interpretation is only an opinion and not the truth.

That's only your opinion.

--
Matt Hucke (hucke@cynico. net), programmer.
author, Graveyards of Illinois - http://graveyards. com/
CYNICO.NET - hosting from $8.33/month; domains $13 - http://cynico. net/


Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66383 From: geranioj@aol.com Date: 2009-06-05
Subject: Re: Commodum ex iniuria sua nemo habere debet
quod scripsi, scripsi


-----Original Message-----
From: Lucius Coruncanius Cato <l.coruncanius_cato@...>
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Fri, 5 Jun 2009 4:54 pm
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: Commodum ex iniuria sua nemo habere debet



L. Coruncanius Cato omn. spd.

Welcome to the Marx brothers cabin!

Di vos incolumem custodiant.
--
L. Coruncanius Cato
Aedilis Curulis
Scriba Consulis Hispaniae

--- El sáb, 6/6/09, Matt Hucke <hucke@cynico. net> escribió:

De: Matt Hucke <hucke@cynico. net>
Asunto: Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: Commodum ex iniuria sua nemo habere debet
Para: Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com
Fecha: sábado, 6 junio, 2009 1:51


> It's also only your opinion that Pauline's interpretation is only an opinion and not the truth.

That's only your opinion.

--
Matt Hucke (hucke@cynico. net), programmer.
author, Graveyards of Illinois - http://graveyards. com/
CYNICO.NET - hosting from $8.33/month; domains $13 - http://cynico. net/

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66384 From: Publius Ullerius Stephanus Venator Date: 2009-06-05
Subject: Venator - quick note - election just past
Avete Omnes;

I should like to thank my colleagues with whom I worked on the
election within the Comitia Centuriata.

Custos - M. Lucretius Agricola, senator
Custos suffectus - Cn. Cornelius Lentulus, pontifex
Diribitor - M. Valerius Traianus
Diribitor - M. Octavius Corvus
Diribitrix suffecta - P Corva Gaudialis
Diribitor suffectus - M Cornelius Gualterus Graecus
Diribitrix suffecta - M Valeria Messallina, Virgo Vestalis Maxima
Diribitrix suffecta - L Iulia Aquila

These men and women were all personable, professional, courteous and diligent.

I think that future elections are in good hands, insofar as the
collection, reconciliation, tallying and reporting of votes is
concerned.

This is my last act as Diribitor Suffectus, with the official
announcement of the results, my term of service is over.

=====================================
In amicitia et fide
Publius Ullerius Stephanus Venator
Civis circa Quintilis MMDCCLI a.u.c.
Custos Emeritus, Diribitor Emeritus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66385 From: C. Maria Caeca Date: 2009-06-05
Subject: Re: Venator - quick note - election just past
Salvete Omnes,

Please allow me to also express my gratitude to, and appreciation of, those
who worked behind the scenes to make this election run as smoothly as it
apparently (from my outside vantage point) did. All of you did an excellent
job, and I'm sure everyone appreciates your hard work. I *know* I do, so
thank you!

Respectfully,
C. Maria Caeca
----- Original Message -----
From: "Publius Ullerius Stephanus Venator" <famila.ulleria.venii@...>
To: "NR-Main List" <Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Friday, June 05, 2009 9:01 PM
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Venator - quick note - election just past


> Avete Omnes;
>
> I should like to thank my colleagues with whom I worked on the
> election within the Comitia Centuriata.
>
> Custos - M. Lucretius Agricola, senator
> Custos suffectus - Cn. Cornelius Lentulus, pontifex
> Diribitor - M. Valerius Traianus
> Diribitor - M. Octavius Corvus
> Diribitrix suffecta - P Corva Gaudialis
> Diribitor suffectus - M Cornelius Gualterus Graecus
> Diribitrix suffecta - M Valeria Messallina, Virgo Vestalis Maxima
> Diribitrix suffecta - L Iulia Aquila
>
> These men and women were all personable, professional, courteous and
> diligent.
>
> I think that future elections are in good hands, insofar as the
> collection, reconciliation, tallying and reporting of votes is
> concerned.
>
> This is my last act as Diribitor Suffectus, with the official
> announcement of the results, my term of service is over.
>
> =====================================
> In amicitia et fide
> Publius Ullerius Stephanus Venator
> Civis circa Quintilis MMDCCLI a.u.c.
> Custos Emeritus, Diribitor Emeritus
>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66386 From: marcushoratius Date: 2009-06-06
Subject: a. d. VIII Eidus Iuniae: Ludi Capitolini
M. Moravius Piscinus cultoribus Deorum et omnibus salutem plurimam dicit: Di Deaeque vos ament.

Hodie est ante diem VIII Eidus Iunoniae; haec dies nefastus aterque est: Ludi Capitolini

AUC 397 / 356 BCE: Birth of Alexander the Great

"As for the lineage of Alexander, on his father's side he was a descendant of Heracles through Caranus, and on his mother's side a descendant of Aeacus through Neoptolemus; this is accepted without any question. And we are told that Philip, after being initiated into the mysteries of Samothrace at the same time with Olympias, he himself being still a youth and she an orphan child, fell in love with her and betrothed himself to her at once with the consent of her brother, Arymbas. Well, then, the night before that on which the marriage was consummated, the bride dreamed that there was a peal of thunder and that a thunder-bolt fell upon her womb, and that thereby much fire was kindled, which broke into flames that travelled all about, and then was extinguished. At a later time, too, after the marriage, Philip dreamed that he was putting a seal upon his wife's womb; and the device of the seal, as he thought, was the figure of a lion. The other seers, now, were led by the vision to suspect that Philip needed to put a closer watch upon his marriage relations; but Aristander of Telmessus said that the woman was pregnant, since no seal was put upon what was empty, and pregnant of a son whose nature would be bold and lion-like. Moreover, a serpent was once seen lying stretched out by the side of Olympias as she slept, and we are told that this, more than anything else, dulled the ardour of Philip's attentions to his wife, so that he no longer came often to sleep by her side, either because he feared that some spells and enchantments might be practised upon him by her, or because he shrank for her embraces in the conviction that she was the partner of a superior being." ~ Plutarch, Life of Alexander


AUC 736 / 17 BCE: Ludi Saeculares continue as ludi Latini et Graecii honoraria

AUC 839 / 86 CE: Ludi Capitolini

These Ludi Capitolini were begun by Domitian. They were modeled after the Olympic games, intended to be held once every four years. Competitors were invited from all parts of the Empire, with the emperor paying for their travel and prizes. These ludi consisted of athletic competitions, as well as competitions in oratory, plays, poetry and music, together with chariot races. A curious features of these ludi Capitolini, rather than the former Ludi Capitolini of October, are mentioned by Plutarch.

Plutarch, Roman Questions 53:

"Why do they even now, at the Ludi Capitolini, proclaim `Sardinians for sale!' and why is an old man led forth in derision wearing around his neck a child's amult that they call a bulla? Is it because the Etruscans called Veians fought against Romulus for a long time, and he took this city last of all and sold at auction many captives together with their king, taunting him for his stupidity and folly? But since the Etruscans were originally Lydians, and Sardis was the capital city of the Lydians, they offered the Veians for sale under this name; and even to this day they preserve the custom in sport."


Flamenica Dialis and Vestalia

Beginning today, in preparation for Vestalia, and lasting through 15 June, the flamenica Dialis does not comb her hair, but instead has it hang down as though in mourning, nor does she trim her nails, nor have sexual relations with her husband. No marriages are to be performed before the closing of the Temple of Vesta on 15 June.


Vesta and the Sacrifice of Metella

"When the Carthaginians and Siceliots were negotiating an alliance against the Romans, Vesta was the only divinity to whom Metellus, the general, did not sacrifice. She, accordingly, sent a contrary wind against his ships. Gaius Julius, the augur, said that it would abate if Metellus should sacrifice his daughter. Forced by necessity, he brought forward his daughter Metella. But Vesta took pity, substituted a heifer, and transported the maiden to Lanuvium, where She appointed her a priestess of the serpent that is worshipped by the people there. So said Pythocles in the third book of his Italian History." ~ Pseudo-Plutarch, Parallela Minora 14


Caecilia Metella and the Temple of Juno Sospita

"During the time of the Marsian War, Caecilia Metella, daughter of Quintus, dreamt that since the women of Rome had taken to using the Temple of Juno Sospita as a public lavatory, and because a bitch had whelped her pups at the foot of Her statue, the Goddess had abandoned the temple, and also planned to leave Rome, prophesizing a series of disasters, all of which came true. Caecilia asked Juno Sospita to stay. She cleansed the temple and restored it, inviting the Goddess to remain, and thereby saved Rome." ~ M. Tullius Cicero, De Divinatione 1.99


Today's thought is from Stobaeus 14-15:

"It is better to live lying on the grass, confiding in Divinity and yourself, than to lie on a golden bed with perturbation. Then will you not be in want of anything, which it is in the power of fortune to give and take away."
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66387 From: marcushoratius Date: 2009-06-06
Subject: Re: Commodum ex iniuria sua nemo habere debet
M. Moravius Horatianus Pont. Max. Ti. Galerio Censori, Quiritibus et omnibus s. p. d.

"Quod bonum, faustum felixque sit, Quirites"

Consider the mos Maioram, as it is told by Titus Livius.

In AUC 544 an ojection was raised to the candidacy of a plebeian for Curio Maximus.

"While the public attention was fixed on more important matters an old controversy was revived on the occasion of the election of a Curio Maximus, in place of M. Aemilius. There was one candidate, a plebeian, C. Mamilius Atellus, and the patricians contended that no votes ought to be counted for him, as none but a patrician had ever yet held that dignity. The tribunes, on being appealed to, referred the matter to the senate, the senate left it to the decision of the people." ~ T. Livius 27.8

Later, in AUC 554, a delay was then raised over the candidacy of T. Flaminius to stand for consul.

"These were delayed by two of the tribunes of the plebs, M. Fulvius and Manius Curius, who would not allow T. Quinctius Flamininus to be a candidate for the consulship as he was only quaestor at the time. They alleged that the offices of aedile and praetor were now looked down upon, the nobility did not rise through the successive posts of honour before trying for the consulship and so give proof of their efficiency, but passing over the intermediate steps made the highest immediately follow the lowest. The question passed from the Campus Martius to the senate, who passed a resolution to the effect that when any one was a candidate for an office of dignity which he might lawfully hold, it was right in such a case that the people should have the power to elect whom they would." ~ T. Livius 32.7

In these and in other examples the ruling principle was always maintained that the People have the right and the power to elect whomever they wish. A prime example of this principle would have to be that of the election of Valerius Corvus as consul even though he had never held office before and was far too young to stand for office. But he had been chosen by the Gods, and as the People recognized this they elected him, and three more times did they elect Valerius Corvus who proved to be one of the best Republican consuls.

The principle that the People have the ultimate power to decide on any question was first established with the selection of a new Rex after the ascension of Romulus into the heavens as Quirinus.

"When the senators became aware of this growing determination, they thought it better to offer spontaneously what they were bound to part with, so, as an act of grace, they committed the supreme power into the hands of the people." ~ T. Livius 1.17

This right and this power was handed over to the People with the words:

"Quod bonum, faustum felixque sit, Quirites."

These very words we use to this day when presenting proposals to the Senate or to the Collegium Pontificum, because, ultimately, it is for the People to decide, and not any single magistrate lest he seek to make himself a king.

The People have decided and that is the end of the matter.


--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Timothy or Stephen Gallagher <spqr753@...> wrote:
>
>
> Salvete Nova Romans
>
> Today is not a good day.
>
>
>
> It would seem that a majority of voters have chosen to cast a ballot for an individual who can not legally serve as Censor. The electorate can no more change this status as it could elect me Emperor.
>
> I have decided not to allow any illegally elected person to have any of the Censors tools or any shared ownership of the Nova Roman lists which are under the temporary care of the Censors. When my successor is elected in the fall I will turn over all ownership tools and lists to that person who can then decide if they want to share them with a person who can not legally be a Censor.
>
> Come January 1st they can prosecute me until their hearts are content but I will not go quietly.
> I will use every legal right I have within Nova Roma to defend my actions as Censor.
>
> Each magistrate must conduct themselves according to the laws and the constitution of Nova Roma. They must also conduct themselves according to the dictates of they own conscience. Allowing a person to act as Censor, who is ineligible to serve, would be a violation of their Oath of office.
>
> I will not violate mine.
>
> As this is the course I have decided to take any member of the Censors office, who disagrees with it, is free to resign.
>
> Vale
>
> Tiberius Galerius Paulinus
> Censor
>
> Commodum ex iniuria sua nemo habere debet
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66388 From: marcushoratius Date: 2009-06-06
Subject: Sacrum Iunonis Covellae
M. Moravius Piscinus Pontifex Maximus: Quiritibus, cultoribus Deorum ex patriae et omnibus: salutem plurimam dicit:

HOC AGETE !

A sacrificial ritual for Juno Covella was performed yesterday, the Nonae Iuniae:

Hail, Juno Covella, eternal Goddess, You who dwells in ancient temples, shining gloriously upon the Arx, most chaste Mother, whose sanctity is pleasing to the hearts of the Gods, You are the brilliant lily whom Jupiter cherished before all others. You are the Great Goddess, Queen of the Gods. You, Goddess, we adore. We invoke Your presence among us. Come. Make what we ask to be readily and easily
accomplished, and draw our thanks, Goddess Juno, that, in fidelity, You do rightly merit. Juno, as it is prescribed for you in those books – and for this reason may every good fortune attend the Roman people, the Quirites – let sacrifice be made to you. I beg and pray that in making this offering to you, I pray with good prayers, that You look favorably on us and our household and our homes; may this offering strengthen and honor You.

To you, Juno Covella, I offer blue irises and incense of orris root.

Juno Covella, in offering to You this incense I pray good prayers that You will look kindly and favorably upon our children and upon us, on our homes and on our households.

Come, most chaste Queen of Heaven, in offering You this libum and strues bread I pray good prayers in order that, pleased with this offering of libum bread, You may be favorable toward us and to our children, to our houses and our households. May You be honored in this.


The festivals to be celebrated in the month of Iunius, tutela Mercuri, shall be:

IUNIUS

KAL Fabariae IUNONI MONETAE
NON Iun (5 Jun.) Iunone Coellone, Iano
(8 Jun.) Mens Bona
(9 – 15 Jun.) VESTALIA
(11 Jun.) MATRALIA
IDUS Iun FERIAE IOVI INVICTO


I pour a libation of honeyed milk for You, Juno Covello.

Juno Covella, may You be strengthened by this libation, may You be honored by this portion of milk.

Then in silence I sit to await signs that my offerings on behalf of the Cives of Nova Roma have been accepted. When these are seen I rise and turn about.

Thus is it done; may the immortal Gods make it so, as fortunate as it is pious.

No more, Gods on High, do I ask of You today; it is enough.



____________

Hoc Agete!

Sacrum Iunonis Covellae

Ave Iuno Covella, Dea aeterna, tenes vetusta delubra, gloriosa in Arce, castissima Mater, cuius sanctitas cordi Diis est, tu candidum lilium quod Juppiter ante omnes coluit. Tu es Magna tuque deorum regina es, dea. Te, Dea, adoramus tuumque nos numen invocamus, facilisque praestes hoc nos quod te rogamus; referemusque grates, Dea Iuno, tibi merita fide. Iuno, uti tibi in illis libris scriptum est quarumque rerum ergo quodque melius sit populo Romano Quiritibus tibi sacrum fiat te quaeso precorque te his donis obmovendis bonas preces precor uti sis volens propitia nobis, domo familaeque nostrae. Macte his donis.

Iuno Covella, te hoc ture ommovendo bonas preces praecor ut sis volens propitius nobis liberisque notris domis familisque nostris.

Huc ades, castissima Regina, te hoc libo strueque obmovendo bonas preces precor ut sis volens propitius nobis liberisque notris domis familisque nostris. mactus hoc ferto.

Iuno Covella macte ista libatione pollicenda sint, macte lacti inferio sint.

Illicet. Di immortales faciant, tam felix quam pia.

Nil amplius vos hodie posco, superi, satis est.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66389 From: Titus Flavius Aquila Date: 2009-06-06
Subject: AW: [Nova-Roma] Re: Commodum ex iniuria sua nemo habere debet
Salve,
 

Censors during the Republic made the effort to work with their political enemies for the good of the res publica.
 
That´s exactly the spirit I would like to see in our Republic of Nova Roma
 
Sure we have heavy political fights, even political enemies, but Nova Roma the res publica should prevail.
 
Vale bene
Titus Flavius Aquila
Quaestor


Von: Maior <rory12001@...>
An: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Gesendet: Samstag, den 6. Juni 2009, 01:47:10 Uhr
Betreff: [Nova-Roma] Re: Commodum ex iniuria sua nemo habere debet

Salve;
not at all. The candidates were approved by the magistrates, the people and the tribunes had plenty of opportunity to legally object. They didn't.

And the people then, and remember, the first centuries composed of Senators voted for Modianus.

So yes, the power lies with the people. If they didn't want K. Fabius Buteo Modianus they would not have voted for him. And the gods decided the ties.
Paulinus is a censor with no imperium. Censors during the Republic made the effort to work with their political enemies for the good of the res publica. I posted it here during the election.
bene vale in pacem deorum
M. Hortensia Maior

>
> Ah, but see it's only your opinion that the election was legal.
>
> It's also only your opinion that Pauline's interpretation is only an opinion and not the truth.
>
>
>
> --- In
rel=nofollow ymailto="mailto:Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com">Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com, "Maior" <rory12001@> wrote:
> >
> > M. Hortensia Maior Paulino censoris quiritibus spd;
> > Pauline, whatever your interpretations or opinions; they are just that - an opinion and not the truth.
> >
> > This kind of 'I am the possessor of the truth and everyone else is wrong' leads to continuing dysfunctionality. And dictatorship.
> >
> > We had a full and fair election; the people made their choices and the gods decided the lots. As censor you must respect the gods of Rome and the people. If Cato won it would be exactly the same.
> >
> > now please, let's stop post election partisan bickering, quarreling and do something real and positive for our community.
> > bene valete in pacem deorum
> > M. Hortensia Maior
> >
> >
> >
> > > >> I am a legally elected censor of Nova Roma, and shall act accordingly.
> > >
> > > See, here's where you're wrong. Your election was not legal, and although you
> > > may act legally as censor, your past actions betray you.
> > >
> > > I'm very sorry Nova Roma has brought this upon herself.
> > >
> > > Q. Poplicola Flamen Falacer
> > >
> > > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com, Timothy or Stephen Gallagher <spqr753@> wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Salvete Nova Romans
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > It has now been made absurdly clear to me that no matter what a Censor may want or even
order it is subject to being over ridden by those who control the "Platform" that Nova Roma uses.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > The Censors tools are to be given to individuals with the express authorization of the Censor. I guess that applies only to those Censors we agree with.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > I will now take the weekend to decide what I will do in responce to this turn of events.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Valete
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Tiberius Galerius Paulinus
> > > >
> > > > Censor
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > To:
href="mailto:Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com" target=_blank rel=nofollow ymailto="mailto:Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com">Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com
> > > > From: hucke@
> > > > Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2009 13:19:40 -0500
> > > > Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Commodum ex iniuria sua nemo habere debet
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, 5 Jun 2009, Timothy or Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > I have decided not to allow any illegally elected person to have any of the
> > > > > Censors tools
> > > >
> > > > As the hosting provider, I control the password files. I will make any changes to
> > > > these that are commanded of me in writing by the consuls.
> > > >
> > > > matt, speaking as sysadmin, not citizen.
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Matt Hucke (hucke@), programmer.
> > > > author, Graveyards of Illinois - http://graveyards. com/
> > > > CYNICO.NET - hosting from $8.33/month; domains $13 - http://cynico. net/
> > > >
> > >
> >
>


Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66390 From: Titus Flavius Aquila Date: 2009-06-06
Subject: AW: [Nova-Roma] Venator - quick note - election just past
Salvete,
 
plurimas gratias to all for a job well done !
 
Optime valete
Titus Flavius Aquila
Quaestor


Von: Publius Ullerius Stephanus Venator <famila.ulleria.venii@...>
An: NR-Main List <Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com>
Gesendet: Samstag, den 6. Juni 2009, 03:01:02 Uhr
Betreff: [Nova-Roma] Venator - quick note - election just past

Avete Omnes;

I should like to thank my colleagues with whom I worked on the
election within the Comitia Centuriata.

Custos - M. Lucretius Agricola, senator
Custos suffectus - Cn. Cornelius Lentulus, pontifex
Diribitor - M. Valerius Traianus
Diribitor - M. Octavius Corvus
Diribitrix suffecta - P Corva Gaudialis
Diribitor suffectus - M Cornelius Gualterus Graecus
Diribitrix suffecta - M Valeria Messallina, Virgo Vestalis Maxima
Diribitrix suffecta - L Iulia Aquila

These men and women were all personable, professional, courteous and diligent.

I think that future elections are in good hands, insofar as the
collection, reconciliation, tallying and reporting of votes is
concerned.

This is my last act as Diribitor Suffectus, with the official
announcement of the results, my term of service is over.

============ ========= ========= =======
In amicitia et fide
Publius Ullerius Stephanus Venator
Civis circa Quintilis MMDCCLI a.u.c.
Custos Emeritus, Diribitor Emeritus


Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66391 From: Gnaeus Iulius Caesar Date: 2009-06-06
Subject: Re: Commodum ex iniuria sua nemo habere debet
Cn. Iulius Caesar M. Moravio Piscino SPD
 
That is an interesting story, but of no relevance because we operate under Nova Roman law. The lex in this matter and the Constitution cannot be nullified by a vote for a candidate.
 
Optime vale

Sent: Saturday, June 06, 2009 5:19 AM
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Commodum ex iniuria sua nemo habere debet

M. Moravius Horatianus Pont. Max. Ti. Galerio Censori, Quiritibus et omnibus s. p. d.

"Quod bonum, faustum felixque sit, Quirites"

Consider the mos Maioram, as it is told by Titus Livius.

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66392 From: deciusiunius Date: 2009-06-06
Subject: Re: Commodum ex iniuria sua nemo habere debet
Salve Pauline,

(returning briefly from my leave of absence to comment and to save time I am essentially reposting what I wrote to you on the BackAlley on this issue. And before people start screaming about forwarding posts from other lists, it's my own post and I can do with it what I wish)


You said you *believe* Nova Roma loses by the election of Modianus. I'm glad you emphasize the word believe, as there is enough ambiguity even with Caesar's excellent analysis of the legality of the situation to allow both interpretations. People are running around speaking in absolutes. You have to ask yourself even if you believe Nova Roma loses from Modianus' election, how will it benefit from such a public challenge by one of its censors to the election of a disagreeable colleague? I think it does neither you nor the republic any good. It looks like sour grapes rather than a stand based on principle.

Nova Roma's method of determining constitutionality is crude but it's the only system we have. The tribunes are the guardians of the constitution. They had an opportunity to veto Modianus' candidacy--they did not. Likely they should have and Modianus should have had the sense and concern for the Republic not to run or withdraw his candidacy but neither happened. Since the tribunes chose not to veto then this is a done deal Constitutionally and you should accept, with as good graces as possible, your new colleague. View this as if the U.S. Supreme Court issued a ruling you disagreed with. I see no other reasonable alternative for you.

Vale,

Palladius





--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Timothy or Stephen Gallagher <spqr753@...> wrote:
>
>
> Salvete Nova Romans
>
> Today is not a good day.
>
>
>
> It would seem that a majority of voters have chosen to cast a ballot for an individual who can not legally serve as Censor. The electorate can no more change this status as it could elect me Emperor.
>
> I have decided not to allow any illegally elected person to have any of the Censors tools or any shared ownership of the Nova Roman lists which are under the temporary care of the Censors. When my successor is elected in the fall I will turn over all ownership tools and lists to that person who can then decide if they want to share them with a person who can not legally be a Censor.
>
> Come January 1st they can prosecute me until their hearts are content but I will not go quietly.
> I will use every legal right I have within Nova Roma to defend my actions as Censor.
>
> Each magistrate must conduct themselves according to the laws and the constitution of Nova Roma. They must also conduct themselves according to the dictates of they own conscience. Allowing a person to act as Censor, who is ineligible to serve, would be a violation of their Oath of office.
>
> I will not violate mine.
>
> As this is the course I have decided to take any member of the Censors office, who disagrees with it, is free to resign.
>
> Vale
>
> Tiberius Galerius Paulinus
> Censor
>
> Commodum ex iniuria sua nemo habere debet
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66393 From: Gnaeus Iulius Caesar Date: 2009-06-06
Subject: Request for Tribuncian intercessio
Cn. Iulius Caesar Tribunibus Plebis SPD.

Not being certain if you will all receive the message I sent via the Nova Roman webmail tool, I repeat and clarify my request.

I believe Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus cannot hold the office of Censor. It violates Section 1 of the Lex Cornelia Iunia de definitione intervallorum magistratuum "No person shall hold the office of censor consecutively" as defined for the purpose of deciding on what "the office of censor" means by Section IV.A of the Constitution.

The Constitution clearly states "Should an office in mid-term become vacant and suitable candidates be at hand, an election shall be held in the appropriate comitia to elect a successor to serve out the remainder of the term within thirty days of the vacancy."

Therefore the Constitution which overrides the absence of a definition in the lex of "office of censor", by virtue of Section I.B of the Constitution - order of legal precedence, provides a definition as being a term of office.

The Censorship is measured in a 24 month term and cannot be sub-divided into smaller separate terms. The term is what is measured, not who sits in the office. Additionally he constitution clearly allows for an election of a suffectus to fill "the remainder of the term".

Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus cannot hold office by virtue of the law and the Constitution, for he held the preceding term of office of Censor.

I request Tribunician intercessio based on the above, against the actions of the Custodes in certifying Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus as the winner of the election, in defiance of the Constitution and the law, and against the Consuls for accepting that certification, which I contend has no legal basis.

Optime valete
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66394 From: Titus Iulius Sabinus Date: 2009-06-06
Subject: Re: Commodum ex iniuria sua nemo habere debet
SALVETE!

I agree with every word of Paladius. More than that, I want to remind to both censors, Galerius Paulinus and Fabius Buteo Modianus, that the censorial office include a sensitive section, that of handling the citizenship applications.
That section is not political; don't serve to other questionable purposes or interests but the only one of Nova Roma interest in increasing the citizens' number.
This moment the priority is to keep united and active the Cohors Censoris, the section which deal with citizenship applications. Modianus already did the right step in this direction.

VALETE,
T. Iulius Sabinus

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "deciusiunius" <bcatfd@...> wrote:
>
>
> Salve Pauline,
>
> (returning briefly from my leave of absence to comment and to save time I am essentially reposting what I wrote to you on the BackAlley on this issue. And before people start screaming about forwarding posts from other lists, it's my own post and I can do with it what I wish)
>
>
> You said you *believe* Nova Roma loses by the election of Modianus. I'm glad you emphasize the word believe, as there is enough ambiguity even with Caesar's excellent analysis of the legality of the situation to allow both interpretations. People are running around speaking in absolutes. You have to ask yourself even if you believe Nova Roma loses from Modianus' election, how will it benefit from such a public challenge by one of its censors to the election of a disagreeable colleague? I think it does neither you nor the republic any good. It looks like sour grapes rather than a stand based on principle.
>
> Nova Roma's method of determining constitutionality is crude but it's the only system we have. The tribunes are the guardians of the constitution. They had an opportunity to veto Modianus' candidacy--they did not. Likely they should have and Modianus should have had the sense and concern for the Republic not to run or withdraw his candidacy but neither happened. Since the tribunes chose not to veto then this is a done deal Constitutionally and you should accept, with as good graces as possible, your new colleague. View this as if the U.S. Supreme Court issued a ruling you disagreed with. I see no other reasonable alternative for you.
>
> Vale,
>
> Palladius
>
>
>
>
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Timothy or Stephen Gallagher <spqr753@> wrote:
> >
> >
> > Salvete Nova Romans
> >
> > Today is not a good day.
> >
> >
> >
> > It would seem that a majority of voters have chosen to cast a ballot for an individual who can not legally serve as Censor. The electorate can no more change this status as it could elect me Emperor.
> >
> > I have decided not to allow any illegally elected person to have any of the Censors tools or any shared ownership of the Nova Roman lists which are under the temporary care of the Censors. When my successor is elected in the fall I will turn over all ownership tools and lists to that person who can then decide if they want to share them with a person who can not legally be a Censor.
> >
> > Come January 1st they can prosecute me until their hearts are content but I will not go quietly.
> > I will use every legal right I have within Nova Roma to defend my actions as Censor.
> >
> > Each magistrate must conduct themselves according to the laws and the constitution of Nova Roma. They must also conduct themselves according to the dictates of they own conscience. Allowing a person to act as Censor, who is ineligible to serve, would be a violation of their Oath of office.
> >
> > I will not violate mine.
> >
> > As this is the course I have decided to take any member of the Censors office, who disagrees with it, is free to resign.
> >
> > Vale
> >
> > Tiberius Galerius Paulinus
> > Censor
> >
> > Commodum ex iniuria sua nemo habere debet
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66395 From: David Kling Date: 2009-06-06
Subject: Re: Request for Tribuncian intercessio
Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus Cn. Iulio salutem dicit

Now you're starting to sound like a dead horse.  We have heard this argument of yours before many times.

The time to veto a part of a comitia centuriata call is during the contio per Lex Fabia de ratione comitiorum centuriatorum.  That did not happen.  It is time that you, Paulinus, and the rest of the Back Alley regulars move on.

The people have spoken.

Valete;

Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus
Censor

On Sat, Jun 6, 2009 at 12:26 PM, Gnaeus Iulius Caesar <gn_iulius_caesar@...> wrote:


Cn. Iulius Caesar Tribunibus Plebis SPD.

Not being certain if you will all receive the message I sent via the Nova Roman webmail tool, I repeat and clarify my request.

I believe Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus cannot hold the office of Censor. It violates Section 1 of the Lex Cornelia Iunia de definitione intervallorum magistratuum "No person shall hold the office of censor consecutively" as defined for the purpose of deciding on what "the office of censor" means by Section IV.A of the Constitution.

The Constitution clearly states "Should an office in mid-term become vacant and suitable candidates be at hand, an election shall be held in the appropriate comitia to elect a successor to serve out the remainder of the term within thirty days of the vacancy."

Therefore the Constitution which overrides the absence of a definition in the lex of "office of censor", by virtue of Section I.B of the Constitution - order of legal precedence, provides a definition as being a term of office.

The Censorship is measured in a 24 month term and cannot be sub-divided into smaller separate terms. The term is what is measured, not who sits in the office. Additionally he constitution clearly allows for an election of a suffectus to fill "the remainder of the term".

Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus cannot hold office by virtue of the law and the Constitution, for he held the preceding term of office of Censor.

I request Tribunician intercessio based on the above, against the actions of the Custodes in certifying Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus as the winner of the election, in defiance of the Constitution and the law, and against the Consuls for accepting that certification, which I contend has no legal basis.

Optime valete




Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66396 From: Gnaeus Iulius Caesar Date: 2009-06-06
Subject: Re: Request for Tribuncian intercessio
Caesar Modiano SPD.
 
Under the Constitution nothing precludes the Tribunes from pronouncing intercessio now.
 
Better a dead horse than a donkey masquerading as one ;>
 
Optime vale
 

Sent: Saturday, June 06, 2009 10:50 AM
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Request for Tribuncian intercessio

Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus Cn. Iulio salutem dicit

Now you're starting to sound like a dead horse.  We have heard this argument of yours before many times.

The time to veto a part of a comitia centuriata call is during the contio per Lex Fabia de ratione comitiorum centuriatorum.  That did not happen.  It is time that you, Paulinus, and the rest of the Back Alley regulars move on.

The people have spoken.

Valete;

Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus
Censor

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66397 From: David Kling Date: 2009-06-06
Subject: Re: Request for Tribuncian intercessio
You are certainly a piece of work Caesar.  I have much better things to do today than to argue with you the same argument that has been beat to death for the past two weeks.

Vale;

Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus

On Sat, Jun 6, 2009 at 12:59 PM, Gnaeus Iulius Caesar <gn_iulius_caesar@...> wrote:


Caesar Modiano SPD.
 
Under the Constitution nothing precludes the Tribunes from pronouncing intercessio now.
 
Better a dead horse than a donkey masquerading as one ;>
 
Optime vale



Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66398 From: Gaius Petronius Dexter Date: 2009-06-06
Subject: Re: Request for Tribunician intercessio
C. Petronius Cn. Caesari s.p.d.,

> Better a dead horse than a donkey masquerading as one

Better the choice of the people than the resentment of a bad loser.

Vale.
C. Petronius Dexter
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66399 From: Steve Moore Date: 2009-06-06
Subject: Petition to the Tribunes

M. Valerius Potitus omnibus SPD.

 

I have also petitioned the Tribunes to pronounce intercessio. Besides the legal arguments, I added what I have said here before—that it is not in the best interest of NR to have anyone serve two terms as Censor. Why? Because the Censors have the power to add and remove Senators based on the biannual census. If the same person is Censor for two censuses in a row, he or she has the opportunity to “stack” the Senate with political allies.

 

Furthermore, the election of Modianus, in violation of the law, sets a precedent for future Censors—now it’s OK for a Censor to serve two consecutive terms, as long as someone serves a short “term” between the “terms”. (No one has answered the question of how short a time that intervening “term” must be. One day? One hour?)

 

Valete,

M. Valerius Potitus

Governor America Austroccidentalis

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66400 From: Gnaeus Iulius Caesar Date: 2009-06-06
Subject: Re: Request for Tribunician intercessio
Caesar Dextro SPD
 
Better the law were followed and the Constitution preserved, than the election of a candidate who cannot serve.
 
Optime vale

Sent: Saturday, June 06, 2009 12:34 PM
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Request for Tribunician intercessio

C. Petronius Cn. Caesari s.p.d.,
 
> Better a dead
horse than a donkey masquerading as one

Better the choice of the people than the resentment of a bad loser.

Vale.
C. Petronius Dexter






------------------------------------

Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo..com/group/Nova-Roma/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    mailto:Nova-Roma-digest@yahoogroups.com
    mailto:Nova-Roma-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66401 From: David Kling Date: 2009-06-06
Subject: Re: Petition to the Tribunes
Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus S.P.D.

This is an absurd accusation.  I was the censor who appointed, for example, Cn. Iulius Caesar to the senate -- knowing full well his thoughts of me.  I took a non-partisan perspective and worked with my colleague to come up with an agreeable list of senate appointments.  No one can accuse me of "stacking" the senate.  I appointed several people who do not agree with me.

Valete:

Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus

On Sat, Jun 6, 2009 at 2:37 PM, Steve Moore <astrobear@...> wrote:


M. Valerius Potitus omnibus SPD.

 

I have also petitioned the Tribunes to pronounce intercessio. Besides the legal arguments, I added what I have said here before—that it is not in the best interest of NR to have anyone serve two terms as Censor. Why? Because the Censors have the power to add and remove Senators based on the biannual census. If the same person is Censor for two censuses in a row, he or she has the opportunity to “stack” the Senate with political allies.

 

Furthermore, the election of Modianus, in violation of the law, sets a precedent for future Censors—now it’s OK for a Censor to serve two consecutive terms, as long as someone serves a short “term” between the “terms”. (No one has answered the question of how short a time that intervening “term” must be. One day? One hour?)

 

Valete,

M. Valerius Potitus

Governor America Austroccidentalis


Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66402 From: Gnaeus Iulius Caesar Date: 2009-06-06
Subject: Re: Petition to the Tribunes
Caesar Modiano SPD
 
Well you did charge two senators for the price of one on my appointment :> The other two you appointed were far more to your taste.
 
Optime vale

Sent: Saturday, June 06, 2009 12:41 PM
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Petition to the Tribunes

Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus S.P.D.

This is an absurd accusation.  I was the censor who appointed, for example, Cn. Iulius Caesar to the senate -- knowing full well his thoughts of me.  I took a non-partisan perspective and worked with my colleague to come up with an agreeable list of senate appointments.  No one can accuse me of "stacking" the senate.  I appointed several people who do not agree with me.

Valete:

Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus

On Sat, Jun 6, 2009 at 2:37 PM, Steve Moore <astrobear@...> wrote:


M. Valerius Potitus omnibus SPD.

 

I have also petitioned the Tribunes to pronounce intercessio. Besides the legal arguments, I added what I have said here before—that it is not in the best interest of NR to have anyone serve two terms as Censor. Why? Because the Censors have the power to add and remove Senators based on the biannual census. If the same person is Censor for two censuses in a row, he or she has the opportunity to “stack” the Senate with political allies.

 

Furthermore, the election of Modianus, in violation of the law, sets a precedent for future Censors—now it’s OK for a Censor to serve two consecutive terms, as long as someone serves a short “term” between the “terms”. (No one has answered the question of how short a time that intervening “term” must be. One day? One hour?)

 

Valete,

M. Valerius Potitus

Governor America Austroccidentalis


Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66403 From: Maior Date: 2009-06-06
Subject: Reminder monday VI Id. Iun: Mens Bona
M. Hortensia Quiritibus spd;
a reminder to all the quirites that Monday the VI. Id. Iun. is the dies natalis, the foundation day of the temple to the goddess Mens Bona.

Mens is an attribute, without which the Roman people and the state could not prosper: call it practical wisdom and prudence in government and affairs. The military disaster of Trasimene resulted in the Libri Sibyllini being consulted. The result was a temple to Mens, vowed by the praetor T. Otacilius Crassus in 217 B.C.E. It was built on the Capitoline. The foundation day, dies natalis, is June 8th.

Dea Mens is not an abstract concept, for the Romans a concept could be so great that it could only come from a god. They might not know the name of the god so the concept itself became the god's name

Well scholarship has concluded that Dea Mens is Venus.

As sacerdos Mentis I will make an offering to Mens and I encourage all Nova Romans to make offerings to her, for ourselves, that we may all contribute to the prosperity of Nova Roma!
bene valete in sapientam Mentis Bonae!
Marca Hortensia Maior
sacerdos Mentis

http://www.novaroma.org/nr/Mens
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66404 From: Cn. Cornelius Lentulus Date: 2009-06-06
Subject: R: [Nova-Roma] Re: Commodum ex iniuria sua nemo habere debet
Cn. Lentulus senior scriba censorius T. Sabino seniori scribae censorio, collegae suo, et Ti. Paulino CES. et Dec. Iunio Palladio sal.


I want to express my agreement with my colleague Sabinus, Senior Censorial Scribe of CES. Ti. Galerius Paulinus.

Unity, unity, unity.

Let it be our mantra. The Censura is much more important as an office than that. If the TWO CENSORS can not make an agreement, Nova Roma will cease to accept new citizens, which would be absurd.

The Tribunes of the Plebs, who are our Constitutional Court, accepted Modianus as a legal censor. The vaste majority of the Nova Roman citizenry accepted Modianus as a legal Censor.

Vox populi, vox Dei.

Paulinus and Modianus are now the Censors of the Nova Roman Republic.

Long live Nova Roma!







--- Sab 6/6/09, Titus Iulius Sabinus <iulius_sabinus@...> ha scritto:

SALVETE!

I agree with every word of Paladius. More than that, I want to remind to both censors, Galerius Paulinus and Fabius Buteo Modianus, that the censorial office include a sensitive section, that of handling the citizenship applications.
That section is not political; don't serve to other questionable purposes or interests but the only one of Nova Roma interest in increasing the citizens' number.
This moment the priority is to keep united and active the Cohors Censoris, the section which deal with citizenship applications. Modianus already did the right step in this direction.

VALETE,
T. Iulius Sabinus

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com, "deciusiunius" <bcatfd@...> wrote:
>
>
> Salve Pauline,
>
> (returning briefly from my leave of absence to comment and to save time I am essentially reposting what I wrote to you on the BackAlley on this issue. And before people start screaming about forwarding posts from other lists, it's my own post and I can do with it what I wish)
>
>
> You said you *believe* Nova Roma loses by the election of Modianus. I'm glad you emphasize the word believe, as there is enough ambiguity even with Caesar's excellent analysis of the legality of the situation to allow both interpretations. People are running around speaking in absolutes. You have to ask yourself even if you believe Nova Roma loses from Modianus' election, how will it benefit from such a public challenge by one of its censors to the election of a disagreeable colleague? I think it does neither you nor the republic any good. It looks like sour grapes rather than a stand based on principle.
>
> Nova Roma's method of determining constitutionality is crude but it's the only system we have. The tribunes are the guardians of the constitution. They had an opportunity to veto Modianus' candidacy--they did not. Likely they should have and Modianus should have had the sense and concern for the Republic not to run or withdraw his candidacy but neither happened. Since the tribunes chose not to veto then this is a done deal Constitutionally and you should accept, with as good graces as possible, your new colleague. View this as if the U.S. Supreme Court issued a ruling you disagreed with. I see no other reasonable alternative for you.
>
> Vale,
>
> Palladius
>
>
>
>
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com, Timothy or Stephen Gallagher <spqr753@> wrote:
> >
> >
> > Salvete Nova Romans
> >
> > Today is not a good day.
> >
> >
> >
> > It would seem that a majority of voters have chosen to cast a ballot for an individual who can not legally serve as Censor. The electorate can no more change this status as it could elect me Emperor.
> >
> > I have decided not to allow any illegally elected person to have any of the Censors tools or any shared ownership of the Nova Roman lists which are under the temporary care of the Censors. When my successor is elected in the fall I will turn over all ownership tools and lists to that person who can then decide if they want to share them with a person who can not legally be a Censor.
> >
> > Come January 1st they can prosecute me until their hearts are content but I will not go quietly.
> > I will use every legal right I have within Nova Roma to defend my actions as Censor.
> >
> > Each magistrate must conduct themselves according to the laws and the constitution of Nova Roma. They must also conduct themselves according to the dictates of they own conscience. Allowing a person to act as Censor, who is ineligible to serve, would be a violation of their Oath of office.
> >
> > I will not violate mine.
> >
> > As this is the course I have decided to take any member of the Censors office, who disagrees with it, is free to resign.
> >
> > Vale
> >
> > Tiberius Galerius Paulinus
> > Censor
> >
> > Commodum ex iniuria sua nemo habere debet
> >
>


Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66405 From: Steve Moore Date: 2009-06-06
Subject: Re: Commodum ex iniuria sua nemo habere debet

Potitus Lentulo SPD.

 

It appears that the new meme in support of Modianus is that we MUST have him as Censor in order to continue to accept new citizens.

 

This is not the case for two reasons:

 

  1. If it is true that we MUST have two Censors in order to continue accepting new citizens, it does NOT follow that the second Censor MUST be Modianus.
  2. It is not true that we MUST have two Censors in order to continue accepting new citizens. This day-to-day work could easily be carried on by one Censor, except that certain leaders of NR decided to tie Censor Paulinus’ hands so that he could not even sneeze without a colleague. So it is these leaders who are preventing the Censor from accepting new citizens.

 

Furthermore, as long as there is reasonable doubt as to Modianus’ eligibilty for running for Censor, ALL his actions in that office will be of questionable validity.

 

Vale,

Potitus

 

 

Cn. Lentulus senior scriba censorius T. Sabino seniori scribae censorio, collegae suo, et Ti. Paulino CES. et Dec. Iunio Palladio sal.


I want to express my agreement with my colleague Sabinus, Senior Censorial Scribe of CES. Ti. Galerius Paulinus.

Unity, unity, unity.

Let it be our mantra. The Censura is much more important as an office than that. If the TWO CENSORS can not make an agreement, Nova Roma will cease to accept new citizens, which would be absurd.

The Tribunes of the Plebs, who are our Constitutional Court , accepted Modianus as a legal censor. The vaste majority of the Nova Roman citizenry accepted Modianus as a legal Censor.

Vox populi, vox Dei.

Paulinus and Modianus are now the Censors of the Nova Roman Republic .

Long live Nova Roma!



 

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66406 From: Q. Valerius Poplicola Date: 2009-06-06
Subject: Re: Commodum ex iniuria sua nemo habere debet
As members of the Censorial Cohort, both Lentulus and I *know* that applications have continually been accepted despite Paulinus being the one and only Censor.

It's unhealthy that people say "unity, unity, unity" for the sake of allowing an evil (running for censor two terms in a row) into the organization.

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Steve Moore" <astrobear@...> wrote:
>
> Potitus Lentulo SPD.
>
>
>
> It appears that the new meme in support of Modianus is that we MUST have him
> as Censor in order to continue to accept new citizens.
>
>
>
> This is not the case for two reasons:
>
>
>
> 1. If it is true that we MUST have two Censors in order to continue
> accepting new citizens, it does NOT follow that the second Censor MUST be
> Modianus.
> 2. It is not true that we MUST have two Censors in order to continue
> accepting new citizens. This day-to-day work could easily be carried on by
> one Censor, except that certain leaders of NR decided to tie Censor
> Paulinus' hands so that he could not even sneeze without a colleague. So it
> is these leaders who are preventing the Censor from accepting new citizens.
>
>
>
> Furthermore, as long as there is reasonable doubt as to Modianus' eligibilty
> for running for Censor, ALL his actions in that office will be of
> questionable validity.
>
>
>
> Vale,
>
> Potitus
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Cn. Lentulus senior scriba censorius T. Sabino seniori scribae censorio,
> collegae suo, et Ti. Paulino CES. et Dec. Iunio Palladio sal.
>
>
> I want to express my agreement with my colleague Sabinus, Senior Censorial
> Scribe of CES. Ti. Galerius Paulinus.
>
> Unity, unity, unity.
>
> Let it be our mantra. The Censura is much more important as an office than
> that. If the TWO CENSORS can not make an agreement, Nova Roma will cease to
> accept new citizens, which would be absurd.
>
> The Tribunes of the Plebs, who are our Constitutional Court, accepted
> Modianus as a legal censor. The vaste majority of the Nova Roman citizenry
> accepted Modianus as a legal Censor.
>
> Vox populi, vox Dei.
>
> Paulinus and Modianus are now the Censors of the Nova Roman Republic.
>
> Long live Nova Roma!
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66407 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2009-06-06
Subject: Re: Request for Tribunician intercessio
Cato Petronio Dextero sal.

Salve.

For the record, Petronius Dexter, I have not said a word regarding this since the results were announced; I would ask you to either withdraw or restate your declaration.

Vale,

Cato



--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Gaius Petronius Dexter" <jfarnoud94@...> wrote:
>
> C. Petronius Cn. Caesari s.p.d.,
>
> > Better a dead horse than a donkey masquerading as one
>
> Better the choice of the people than the resentment of a bad loser.
>
> Vale.
> C. Petronius Dexter
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66409 From: Gnaeus Iulius Caesar Date: 2009-06-06
Subject: Re: Request for Tribunician intercessio
Caesar Maori SPD.

Whatever Cato may elect to say or not say will not alter the fact that I have requested the Tribunes to pronounce intercessio and I certainly have no intention of withdrawing that request.
 
Optime vale
 

From: Maior
Sent: Saturday, June 06, 2009 5:48 PM
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Request for Tribunician intercessio

Salve Cato;
 then kindly tell your friends and supporters that you lost and to end the ML drama.

When Sabinus ran against Laenas last year I voted for Sabinus. I thought he was the better candidate. Sabinus lost, Laenas won. We
accepted that.

Now that the elections are over let's move on to something productive. Monday I hope all the cives in Nova Roma make an offering to Dea Mens, we need her!
               bene vale in sapientam Mentis Bonae
                 Marca Hortensia Maior

http://www.novaroma.org/nr/Mens

>
> Salve.
>
> For the record, Petronius Dexter, I have not
said a word regarding this since the results were announced; I would ask you to either withdraw or restate your declaration.
>
> Vale,
>
> Cato
>
>
>
> --- In
href="mailto:Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com">Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Gaius Petronius Dexter" <jfarnoud94@> wrote:
> >
> > C.
Petronius Cn. Caesari s.p.d.,
> > 
> > > Better a
dead horse than a donkey masquerading as one
> >
> > Better
the choice of the people than the resentment of a bad loser.
> >
> > Vale.
> > C. Petronius Dexter
> >
>




------------------------------------

Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo..com/group/Nova-Roma/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    mailto:Nova-Roma-digest@yahoogroups.com
    mailto:Nova-Roma-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66410 From: Timothy or Stephen Gallagher Date: 2009-06-06
Subject: Senate appointments
Salvete
 
"No one can accuse me of "stacking" the senate.  I appointed several people who do not agree with me."

 
As did I.   When I had a colleague and when I did not.
 
Valete
 
Paulinus
 

To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
From: tau.athanasios@...
Date: Sat, 6 Jun 2009 14:41:19 -0400
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Petition to the Tribunes



Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus S.P.D.

This is an absurd accusation.  I was the censor who appointed, for example, Cn. Iulius Caesar to the senate -- knowing full well his thoughts of me.  I took a non-partisan perspective and worked with my colleague to come up with an agreeable list of senate appointments.  No one can accuse me of "stacking" the senate.  I appointed several people who do not agree with me.

Valete:

Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus

On Sat, Jun 6, 2009 at 2:37 PM, Steve Moore <astrobear@cox. net> wrote:



M. Valerius Potitus omnibus SPD.
 
I have also petitioned the Tribunes to pronounce intercessio. Besides the legal arguments, I added what I have said here before—that it is not in the best interest of NR to have anyone serve two terms as Censor. Why? Because the Censors have the power to add and remove Senators based on the biannual census. If the same person is Censor for two censuses in a row, he or she has the opportunity to “stack” the Senate with political allies.
 
Furthermore, the election of Modianus, in violation of the law, sets a precedent for future Censors—now it’s OK for a Censor to serve two consecutive terms, as long as someone serves a short “term” between the “terms”. (No one has answered the question of how short a time that intervening “term” must be. One day? One hour?)
 
Valete,
M. Valerius Potitus
Governor America Austroccidentalis


Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66411 From: Maior Date: 2009-06-06
Subject: Apollonius of Tyana
M. Hortensia quiritibus spd;
I remember Graecus Agicola and I having a little discussion about this eminent man.
When I looked in the book he mentioned which was about magicians, I was thinking that this is a typical prejudice nowdays in the West, that wise men philosophers don't and should not have any kind of powers. But of course in India one finds godmen and godwomen, heroes possessing powers all the time. Some are indeed charlatans and some authentic.

In ancient Rome, we'd fine the same spread...
Maior
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66412 From: gualterus_graecus Date: 2009-06-07
Subject: Re: Apollonius of Tyana
Salve Maior,

Is this in reference to the discussion in chapter 2, pp 51-56, about Apollonius as philosopher?

Vale,

Gualterus

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Maior" <rory12001@...> wrote:
>
> M. Hortensia quiritibus spd;
> I remember Graecus Agicola and I having a little discussion about this eminent man.
> When I looked in the book he mentioned which was about magicians, I was thinking that this is a typical prejudice nowdays in the West, that wise men philosophers don't and should not have any kind of powers. But of course in India one finds godmen and godwomen, heroes possessing powers all the time. Some are indeed charlatans and some authentic.
>
> In ancient Rome, we'd fine the same spread...
> Maior
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66413 From: Maior Date: 2009-06-07
Subject: Re: Apollonius of Tyana
Salve Gualtere;
yes, I'd been leafing through Reimer at the library,and reading an essay in "Theios Sophistes" and thinking about Kingsley's excellent "Ancient Philosophy Mystery and Magic" D. Ogden's "Greek and Roman Necromancy." Pythagoreansim is an interest of mine.

Those books are quite good on pythagoreans and neo-pythagoreans. Kingsley before he went new agey did a good job in dissecting them and the shamanic aspects of pythagoras and pythagoreanism. It didn't seem so different to me from that Indian ideal. Plato split mind and body and ever after the philosopher who had powers seems to have disappeared from the West. Not magic but that type...it's a matter of interest to me.
vale
Maior

>
> Is this in reference to the discussion in chapter 2, pp 51-56, about Apollonius as philosopher?
>
> Vale,
>
> Gualterus
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Maior" <rory12001@> wrote:
> >
> > M. Hortensia quiritibus spd;
> > I remember Graecus Agicola and I having a little discussion about this eminent man.
> > When I looked in the book he mentioned which was about magicians, I was thinking that this is a typical prejudice nowdays in the West, that wise men philosophers don't and should not have any kind of powers. But of course in India one finds godmen and godwomen, heroes possessing powers all the time. Some are indeed charlatans and some authentic.
> >
> > In ancient Rome, we'd fine the same spread...
> > Maior
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66414 From: gualterus_graecus Date: 2009-06-07
Subject: Re: Apollonius of Tyana
Salve Maior,

I've not read Kingsley's book, but Ogden's book is decent, although, I'd say better as a compendium of references and interesting individual discussions than presenting a coherent overall theory and understanding of the nature of magic and necromancy.

I wouldn't put so much emphasis on Plato "splitting mind and body"-- Radical monism wasn't common before Plato. And, as you may gather from Reimer's discussion, in late antiquity some could associate philosophy with power as well. Philostratus isn't the only example; you have Galen calling Jesus a philosopher (of course, the one mention of "philosophy" in the New Testament, Col 2:8, is not at all positive). Linking "philosophy" with religious views can happen in other ways too, such as in Asclepius 14, where to adore the godhead without "curious thinking" is pure philosophy.

Those examples aside, I wonder whether whatever Sanskrit or other term Indian gurus have for "philosophy" really doesn't correspond to the Greek term. I have no knowledge of Sanskrit or other Indic languages, so someone else would have to step in at this point, but perhaps the problem is that "theologian" better fits whatever Indian terminology and that to invoke "philosophy/philosopher" is inappropriate?

Vale,

Gualterus

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Maior" <rory12001@...> wrote:
>
> Salve Gualtere;
> yes, I'd been leafing through Reimer at the library,and reading an essay in "Theios Sophistes" and thinking about Kingsley's excellent "Ancient Philosophy Mystery and Magic" D. Ogden's "Greek and Roman Necromancy." Pythagoreansim is an interest of mine.
>
> Those books are quite good on pythagoreans and neo-pythagoreans. Kingsley before he went new agey did a good job in dissecting them and the shamanic aspects of pythagoras and pythagoreanism. It didn't seem so different to me from that Indian ideal. Plato split mind and body and ever after the philosopher who had powers seems to have disappeared from the West. Not magic but that type...it's a matter of interest to me.
> vale
> Maior
>
> >
> > Is this in reference to the discussion in chapter 2, pp 51-56, about Apollonius as philosopher?
> >
> > Vale,
> >
> > Gualterus
> >
> > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Maior" <rory12001@> wrote:
> > >
> > > M. Hortensia quiritibus spd;
> > > I remember Graecus Agicola and I having a little discussion about this eminent man.
> > > When I looked in the book he mentioned which was about magicians, I was thinking that this is a typical prejudice nowdays in the West, that wise men philosophers don't and should not have any kind of powers. But of course in India one finds godmen and godwomen, heroes possessing powers all the time. Some are indeed charlatans and some authentic.
> > >
> > > In ancient Rome, we'd fine the same spread...
> > > Maior
> > >
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66415 From: Maior Date: 2009-06-07
Subject: Re: Apollonius of Tyana
Salve Gualtere;
ecastor, you're entirely right he's is just decent, I'd meant Matthew Dickie's excellent "Magic and Magicians in the Greco-Roman Empire." I read it in Ireland at dark Trinity Library ages ago. Kingsley throws out lots of ideas, some thinly supported but he is an exciting read, very stimulating.
I have to be out tomorrow but I will reply to you later, your post is very thought-provoking and I need to think a bit for a proper reply. A very stimulating discussion!
bene vale
Maior
>
> Salve Maior,
>
> I've not read Kingsley's book, but Ogden's book is decent, although, I'd say better as a compendium of references and interesting individual discussions than presenting a coherent overall theory and understanding of the nature of magic and necromancy.
>
> I wouldn't put so much emphasis on Plato "splitting mind and body"-- Radical monism wasn't common before Plato. And, as you may gather from Reimer's discussion, in late antiquity some could associate philosophy with power as well. Philostratus isn't the only example; you have Galen calling Jesus a philosopher (of course, the one mention of "philosophy" in the New Testament, Col 2:8, is not at all positive). Linking "philosophy" with religious views can happen in other ways too, such as in Asclepius 14, where to adore the godhead without "curious thinking" is pure philosophy.
>
> Those examples aside, I wonder whether whatever Sanskrit or other term Indian gurus have for "philosophy" really doesn't correspond to the Greek term. I have no knowledge of Sanskrit or other Indic languages, so someone else would have to step in at this point, but perhaps the problem is that "theologian" better fits whatever Indian terminology and that to invoke "philosophy/philosopher" is inappropriate?
>
> Vale,
>
> Gualterus
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Maior" <rory12001@> wrote:
> >
> > Salve Gualtere;
> > yes, I'd been leafing through Reimer at the library,and reading an essay in "Theios Sophistes" and thinking about Kingsley's excellent "Ancient Philosophy Mystery and Magic" D. Ogden's "Greek and Roman Necromancy." Pythagoreansim is an interest of mine.
> >
> > Those books are quite good on pythagoreans and neo-pythagoreans. Kingsley before he went new agey did a good job in dissecting them and the shamanic aspects of pythagoras and pythagoreanism. It didn't seem so different to me from that Indian ideal. Plato split mind and body and ever after the philosopher who had powers seems to have disappeared from the West. Not magic but that type...it's a matter of interest to me.
> > vale
> > Maior
> >
> > >
> > > Is this in reference to the discussion in chapter 2, pp 51-56, about Apollonius as philosopher?
> > >
> > > Vale,
> > >
> > > Gualterus
> > >
> > > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Maior" <rory12001@> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > M. Hortensia quiritibus spd;
> > > > I remember Graecus Agicola and I having a little discussion about this eminent man.
> > > > When I looked in the book he mentioned which was about magicians, I was thinking that this is a typical prejudice nowdays in the West, that wise men philosophers don't and should not have any kind of powers. But of course in India one finds godmen and godwomen, heroes possessing powers all the time. Some are indeed charlatans and some authentic.
> > > >
> > > > In ancient Rome, we'd fine the same spread...
> > > > Maior
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66416 From: gualterus_graecus Date: 2009-06-07
Subject: Re: Apollonius of Tyana
Salve Maior,

Yes, you're right that Dickie's survey is much better. I think everyone studying Roman history should read it! Btw, it's "World" not "Empire". :)

Vale,

Gualterus

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Maior" <rory12001@...> wrote:
>
> Salve Gualtere;
> ecastor, you're entirely right he's is just decent, I'd meant Matthew Dickie's excellent "Magic and Magicians in the Greco-Roman Empire." I read it in Ireland at dark Trinity Library ages ago. Kingsley throws out lots of ideas, some thinly supported but he is an exciting read, very stimulating.
> I have to be out tomorrow but I will reply to you later, your post is very thought-provoking and I need to think a bit for a proper reply. A very stimulating discussion!
> bene vale
> Maior
> >
> > Salve Maior,
> >
> > I've not read Kingsley's book, but Ogden's book is decent, although, I'd say better as a compendium of references and interesting individual discussions than presenting a coherent overall theory and understanding of the nature of magic and necromancy.
> >
> > I wouldn't put so much emphasis on Plato "splitting mind and body"-- Radical monism wasn't common before Plato. And, as you may gather from Reimer's discussion, in late antiquity some could associate philosophy with power as well. Philostratus isn't the only example; you have Galen calling Jesus a philosopher (of course, the one mention of "philosophy" in the New Testament, Col 2:8, is not at all positive). Linking "philosophy" with religious views can happen in other ways too, such as in Asclepius 14, where to adore the godhead without "curious thinking" is pure philosophy.
> >
> > Those examples aside, I wonder whether whatever Sanskrit or other term Indian gurus have for "philosophy" really doesn't correspond to the Greek term. I have no knowledge of Sanskrit or other Indic languages, so someone else would have to step in at this point, but perhaps the problem is that "theologian" better fits whatever Indian terminology and that to invoke "philosophy/philosopher" is inappropriate?
> >
> > Vale,
> >
> > Gualterus
> >
> > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Maior" <rory12001@> wrote:
> > >
> > > Salve Gualtere;
> > > yes, I'd been leafing through Reimer at the library,and reading an essay in "Theios Sophistes" and thinking about Kingsley's excellent "Ancient Philosophy Mystery and Magic" D. Ogden's "Greek and Roman Necromancy." Pythagoreansim is an interest of mine.
> > >
> > > Those books are quite good on pythagoreans and neo-pythagoreans. Kingsley before he went new agey did a good job in dissecting them and the shamanic aspects of pythagoras and pythagoreanism. It didn't seem so different to me from that Indian ideal. Plato split mind and body and ever after the philosopher who had powers seems to have disappeared from the West. Not magic but that type...it's a matter of interest to me.
> > > vale
> > > Maior
> > >
> > > >
> > > > Is this in reference to the discussion in chapter 2, pp 51-56, about Apollonius as philosopher?
> > > >
> > > > Vale,
> > > >
> > > > Gualterus
> > > >
> > > > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Maior" <rory12001@> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > M. Hortensia quiritibus spd;
> > > > > I remember Graecus Agicola and I having a little discussion about this eminent man.
> > > > > When I looked in the book he mentioned which was about magicians, I was thinking that this is a typical prejudice nowdays in the West, that wise men philosophers don't and should not have any kind of powers. But of course in India one finds godmen and godwomen, heroes possessing powers all the time. Some are indeed charlatans and some authentic.
> > > > >
> > > > > In ancient Rome, we'd fine the same spread...
> > > > > Maior
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66417 From: Cn. Cornelius Lentulus Date: 2009-06-07
Subject: R: [Nova-Roma] Re: Commodum ex iniuria sua nemo habere debet
Policola and Potitus;

The censors can veto each other, two hostile censors can distruct the smooth working of the cohors. One censor can say "XY is my applicant, I decide over him", the other say, "no it's my appicant": what will then happen?

Modianus is not yet in the Cohors and he did not yet start to deal with citizenship applications. This is why there was no conflict so far. And I hope a reconciliation between the two censors will be why there will be no conflict later.

Two censors actively working on citizenship applications WITHOUT agreement is impossible. Either acknowledge each other's acts, or continuously fight about who decides what.

Both Potitus and Poplicola is right that we don't have to have two censors for processing citizenship application, in fact, we don't need even one, since the job is done by scribes. What Poplicola and Potitus doesn't know or understand it's that if once there are censors they CAN order their scribes to do anything, and if censor A says "I reject this application", censor B says "No, I approve": or, A: "I approve this name", B: "No I don't". A: "I place all applicant with surnames beginning with letters A - M under my authority" B: "No, I don't allow them to you etc etc"...

So, if BOTH censors want authority over citizenship application, it is not possible without an agreement.

This is what I am talking about.




--- Sab 6/6/09, Q. Valerius Poplicola <q.valerius.poplicola@...> ha scritto:

Da: Q. Valerius Poplicola <q.valerius.poplicola@...>
Oggetto: [Nova-Roma] Re: Commodum ex iniuria sua nemo habere debet
A: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Data: Sabato 6 giugno 2009, 23:01



As members of the Censorial Cohort, both Lentulus and I *know* that applications have continually been accepted despite Paulinus being the one and only Censor.

It's unhealthy that people say "unity, unity, unity" for the sake of allowing an evil (running for censor two terms in a row) into the organization.

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com, "Steve Moore" <astrobear@. ..> wrote:
>
> Potitus Lentulo SPD.
>
>
>
> It appears that the new meme in support of Modianus is that we MUST have him
> as Censor in order to continue to accept new citizens.
>
>
>
> This is not the case for two reasons:
>
>
>
> 1. If it is true that we MUST have two Censors in order to continue
> accepting new citizens, it does NOT follow that the second Censor MUST be
> Modianus.
> 2. It is not true that we MUST have two Censors in order to continue
> accepting new citizens. This day-to-day work could easily be carried on by
> one Censor, except that certain leaders of NR decided to tie Censor
> Paulinus' hands so that he could not even sneeze without a colleague. So it
> is these leaders who are preventing the Censor from accepting new citizens.
>
>
>
> Furthermore, as long as there is reasonable doubt as to Modianus' eligibilty
> for running for Censor, ALL his actions in that office will be of
> questionable validity.
>
>
>
> Vale,
>
> Potitus
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Cn. Lentulus senior scriba censorius T. Sabino seniori scribae censorio,
> collegae suo, et Ti. Paulino CES. et Dec. Iunio Palladio sal.
>
>
> I want to express my agreement with my colleague Sabinus, Senior Censorial
> Scribe of CES. Ti. Galerius Paulinus.
>
> Unity, unity, unity.
>
> Let it be our mantra. The Censura is much more important as an office than
> that. If the TWO CENSORS can not make an agreement, Nova Roma will cease to
> accept new citizens, which would be absurd.
>
> The Tribunes of the Plebs, who are our Constitutional Court, accepted
> Modianus as a legal censor. The vaste majority of the Nova Roman citizenry
> accepted Modianus as a legal Censor.
>
> Vox populi, vox Dei.
>
> Paulinus and Modianus are now the Censors of the Nova Roman Republic.
>
> Long live Nova Roma!
>


Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66418 From: Q. Valerius Poplicola Date: 2009-06-07
Subject: R: [Nova-Roma] Re: Commodum ex iniuria sua nemo habere debet
"What Poplicola and Potitus doesn't know or understand"

Highly arrogant of you, don't you think?

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Cn. Cornelius Lentulus" <cn_corn_lent@...> wrote:
>
> Policola and Potitus;
>
> The censors can veto each other, two hostile censors can distruct the smooth working of the cohors. One censor can say "XY is my applicant, I decide over him", the other say, "no it's my appicant": what will then happen?
>
> Modianus is not yet in the Cohors and he did not yet start to deal with citizenship applications. This is why there was no conflict so far. And I hope a reconciliation between the two censors will be why there will be no conflict later.
>
> Two censors actively working on citizenship applications WITHOUT agreement is impossible. Either acknowledge each other's acts, or continuously fight about who decides what.
>
> Both Potitus and Poplicola is right that we don't have to have two censors for processing citizenship application, in fact, we don't need even one, since the job is done by scribes. What Poplicola and Potitus doesn't know or understand it's that if once there are censors they CAN order their scribes to do anything, and if censor A says "I reject this application", censor B says "No, I approve": or, A: "I approve this name", B: "No I don't". A: "I place all applicant with surnames beginning with letters A - M under my authority" B: "No, I don't allow them to you etc etc"...
>
> So, if BOTH censors want authority over citizenship application, it is not possible without an agreement.
>
> This is what I am talking about.
>
>
>
>
> --- Sab 6/6/09, Q. Valerius Poplicola <q.valerius.poplicola@...> ha scritto:
>
> Da: Q. Valerius Poplicola <q.valerius.poplicola@...>
> Oggetto: [Nova-Roma] Re: Commodum ex iniuria sua nemo habere debet
> A: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> Data: Sabato 6 giugno 2009, 23:01
>
>
>
> As members of the Censorial Cohort, both Lentulus and I *know* that applications have continually been accepted despite Paulinus being the one and only Censor.
>
> It's unhealthy that people say "unity, unity, unity" for the sake of allowing an evil (running for censor two terms in a row) into the organization.
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com, "Steve Moore" <astrobear@ ..> wrote:
> >
> > Potitus Lentulo SPD.
> >
> >
> >
> > It appears that the new meme in support of Modianus is that we MUST have him
> > as Censor in order to continue to accept new citizens.
> >
> >
> >
> > This is not the case for two reasons:
> >
> >
> >
> > 1. If it is true that we MUST have two Censors in order to continue
> > accepting new citizens, it does NOT follow that the second Censor MUST be
> > Modianus.
> > 2. It is not true that we MUST have two Censors in order to continue
> > accepting new citizens. This day-to-day work could easily be carried on by
> > one Censor, except that certain leaders of NR decided to tie Censor
> > Paulinus' hands so that he could not even sneeze without a colleague. So it
> > is these leaders who are preventing the Censor from accepting new citizens.
> >
> >
> >
> > Furthermore, as long as there is reasonable doubt as to Modianus' eligibilty
> > for running for Censor, ALL his actions in that office will be of
> > questionable validity.
> >
> >
> >
> > Vale,
> >
> > Potitus
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Cn. Lentulus senior scriba censorius T. Sabino seniori scribae censorio,
> > collegae suo, et Ti. Paulino CES. et Dec. Iunio Palladio sal.
> >
> >
> > I want to express my agreement with my colleague Sabinus, Senior Censorial
> > Scribe of CES. Ti. Galerius Paulinus.
> >
> > Unity, unity, unity.
> >
> > Let it be our mantra. The Censura is much more important as an office than
> > that. If the TWO CENSORS can not make an agreement, Nova Roma will cease to
> > accept new citizens, which would be absurd.
> >
> > The Tribunes of the Plebs, who are our Constitutional Court, accepted
> > Modianus as a legal censor. The vaste majority of the Nova Roman citizenry
> > accepted Modianus as a legal Censor.
> >
> > Vox populi, vox Dei.
> >
> > Paulinus and Modianus are now the Censors of the Nova Roman Republic.
> >
> > Long live Nova Roma!
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66419 From: Kirsteen Wright Date: 2009-06-07
Subject: Classical education
As part of a series on Britain's education system a short quiz on 'Do you need a classical education' i have to say it is quite easy.

http://timesonline.typepad.com/schoolgate/2009/06/do-you-need-a-better-classical-education-take-our-quiz.html

Flavia Lucilla Merula
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66420 From: marcushoratius Date: 2009-06-07
Subject: a. d. VII Eidus Iuniae: Temple of Vesta is Opened
M. Moravius Piscinus cultoribus Deorum et omnibus salutem plurimam dicit: Curate ut valeatis, et Di vos servent.

Hodie est ante diem VII Eidus Iuniae; haec dies religiosus est: Vesta apertit; Ludi Piscatorii.

Temple of Vesta opened.

Two days before the Vestalia, the inner most chamber of the Temple of Vesta was opened. This inner sanctum, called the penus, remained opened until 15 June when the temple was again purified. These days are dies religiosi (Festus s. v. penus). "For those days are called religiosi which are ill-famed and hampered by an evil omen, so that on them one must refrain from offering sacrifice or beginning any new business whatever; they are, namely, the days that the ignorant multitude falsely and improperly call nefasti (Gellius, Noctes Atticae 4.9.5)." Religiosum refers to acts or to things "made by men without permission, that is, without the expressed will of the Gods (C. Aelius Gallus, De Significatione Verborum Quae ad Ius Civile Pertinent; GRF Aelius 18; Fest. p.278b.15)." In one sense religiosum refers to whatever is prohibited because it exceeds the norms of Roman religious practices, and is thus superstition, and thus pollutes or vitiates sacred rites. In another connotation, religiosum is distinguished from what is held to be sacrum. "Sacra are those things consecrated to the (celestial) Gods; things that are religiosum are dedicated to the Di Inferi (Gaius, Institutiones Iustiniani II. 1-11)."

First we may note that on these days the flamenica Dialis was not permitted to have sexual relations with her husband, but instead took on mourning dress, and since both were needed to be present at confarreationes, her absence on these days, being in the Temple of Vesta with other matrons, meant that marriages in general were not performed at this time. Marriages were nefas, not permitted, during the festival of the Virgin Vesta. That is one aspect of religiosum.

Only matrons were permitted to come to the temple, and only on these days. No men were ever permitted into the Temple of Vesta, except the Pontifex Maximus, and there is some question as to whether even he was prohibited from the penus. No men, no women, other than matrons, at this time; this also is religiosum.

"As Pontifex Maximus Metellus was on his way to the district of Tusculum, two ravens two ravens flew at his face as though to stop his progress. However he took no notice of this augury and kept going. The birds started to tear at each other with their claws and peck with their beaks. Wondering then, Metellus returned home. That night the Temple of Vesta caught fire. In the conflagration Metellus seized the Palladium from the midst of the flames and saved it intact." ~ Valerius Maximus 1.4.5

However, the other part of this story is that Metellus was blinded for having entered Vesta's inner sanctum where no man is allowed, in spite of his having been Pontifex Maximus.

The matrons came barefoot to the Temple of Vesta. Each day of the festival they brought offerings of simple food on plain, old-fashioned ware to the temple. The Vestales offered sacred cakes and may have also been those who sacrificed the offerings brought by the matrons, if not by the women themselves.

This time also saw millers and bakers celebrating. Part of the festival saw donkeys decorated with wreathes made of loaves of bread. Donkeys are the sacred animal of Vesta. Ovid tells a tale where, during a banquet of the Gods, Vesta went off to sleep. Priapus tried to rape Her, but She was warned by the braying of a donkey.

The penus held the most sacred articles of Rome. Among them was the Palladium said to have been brought by Aeneas from Ilium. This may relate to these days being held religiosum in another way. First, although we associate Vesta with the sacred fire of the hearth, this hearth, as the center of the house, relates to the axis mundi, and Vesta is at times identified as Earth. As fire and as earth She receives the bodies of the dead, and through this relates to the Di inferni. Also the items stored in Her temple, some brought by Aeneas, as it was thought, would mean that She was the guardian of the Penates, who would be identified with Di inferni. Lastly, the penus in the Temple of Vesta was possibly an underground chamber, as with Ops and Consus, for we see in a story told by Livy how some of these sacred objects were otherwise hidden underground during the Gallic sack of Rome. This, too, would relate Vesta to the Di inferni, and thus to what is religiosum.

"While all this was going on, the Flamen of Quirinus and the Vestal virgins, without giving a thought to their own property, were deliberating as to which of the sacred things they ought to take with them, and which to leave behind, since they had not strength enough to carry all, and also what place would be the safest for their custody. They thought best to conceal what they could not take in earthen jars and bury them under the chapel next to the Flamen's house, where spitting is now forbidden. The rest they divided amongst them and carried off, taking the road which leads by the Pons Sublicius to the Janiculum. Whilst ascending that hill they were seen by L. Albinius, a Roman plebeian who with the rest of the crowd who were unfit for war was leaving the City. Even in that critical hour the distinction between sacred and profane was not forgotten. He had his wife and children with him in a wagon, and it seemed to him an act of impiety for him and his family to be seen in a vehicle whilst the national priests should be trudging along on foot, bearing the sacred vessels of Rome. He ordered his wife and children to get down, put the virgins and their sacred burden in the wagon, and drove them to Caere, their destination." ~ Titus Livius 5.40.7-10


Ludi Piscatorii

Today also saw a celebration for the genius of the River Tiber, Tiberius. Games were held in the river itself, near the Temple of Volcanus in the Campus Martius (Festus p. 238M; Ovid, Fasti 6.237-240). The Praetor urbanus conducted the games, which were sponsored by the guilds of fishermen and urine collectors (CIL 6.1872: corporis piscatorum et / urinatorum). The catch of the fisherman were brought to the Temple of Volcanus where the fish were sacrificed to Volcanus (Festus p. 345L). These games were related to the Tibernalia held on 17 August by the same two guilds. For the Volcanalia, 23 August, Varro said that the people would bless their animals by having them pass over the sacred fire of Volcanus, in similar fashion as occurred at Palilia (Lingua Latinae 6.20). This has been misinterpreted to mean that sacrificial animals were led into the fire of Volcanus and burned alive. It has been further interpreted as though the fish caught at the Ludi Piscatorii and at Tibernalia were likewise tossed into the flames alive as a sacrifice. These are two very different rituals and thus they should not be confused with one another. Fish, representing water, would seem as natural to offer Volcanus as pigs for Ceres was explained by Ovid because they uprooted Her crops, or as goats were to Liber because they destroyed His vines.

While the matrons were away at the Temple of Vesta, and the fishermen were busy in their games on the river, spectators in the Campus Martius were busy in their own entertainment, as Ovid relates. "Often revelers, returning on the City's waters, sang and attacked boatmen with drunken words" (Ovid, Fasti 6.407-408). They must have made it a profitable day for the urine collectors. Urine was an important commodity for the cloth industry; it was used in making dyes, and in bleaching cloth, especially the toga candida worn by candidates for political office.


Our thought for today is from the Vatican Sayings of Epicurus 21.

"We must not force Nature but persuade her. We shall persuade her if we satisfy the necessary desires and also those bodily desires that do not harm us while sternly rejecting those that are harmful."
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66421 From: canadaoccidentalis@yahoo.ca Date: 2009-06-07
Subject: Intercessio
Tribunus Plebis Gaius Vipsanius Agrippa SPD

I pronounce intercessio against the custodes Marcus Lucretius Agricola and Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus in certifying the election of Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus as censor and against the consuls Marcus Iulius Severus and Marcus Cornelius Complutensis in accepting the election results. 

This action was requested by Senator Gnaeus Iulius Caesar, Senator Lucius Cornelius Sulla Felix, Quintus Valerius Poplicola, and Marcus Valerius Potitus.

Modianus cannot hold the office of censor. This would violate Section 1 of the Lex Cornelia Iunia de definitione intervallorum magistratuum; "no person shall hold the office of censor consecutively" with Section IV A of the constitution as the definition of the term 'office of censor'.

As the Lex Cornelia Iunia de definitione intervallorum magistratuum does not define the term 'office of censor', the Constitution is used by virtue of Section I B, giving precedence to the constitution as the highest legal authority.

The censorship is measured in a 2 year term and cannot be subdivided. Modianus cannot hold the office consecutively.

Gaius Vipsanius Agrippa
Tribunus Plebis
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66422 From: violetphearsen@yahoo.com Date: 2009-06-07
Subject: Re: kitten report?
The kittens are doing very well. I spoke with our friend who is caring for them and she reports the kittens have been weaned and are eating kitten food like it's going out of style. Naturally, being babies still, they make a mess sliding the dishes all over the place. I haven't been given any pictures yet, but they have been given their Roman names.
The boy kittens have been named Caelius, Felix and Numa.
The girl kittens have been named Diana, Palatina and Tullia.
We've nicknamed them the Argei Micine.
I'll ask our friend for pictures when I see her at our Vestalia ritual on Tuesday. I told her to bring the kittens so they can be present at the ritual and we can visit with them afterwards. Should make for a fun day. :)
 
Vale bene in pace Deorum,
 
Maxima Valeria Messallina
 

--- On Sun, 5/31/09, C. Maria Caeca <shoshanahathaway@...> wrote:

From: C. Maria Caeca <shoshanahathaway@...>
Subject: [Nova-Roma] kitten report?
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Date: Sunday, May 31, 2009, 3:05 PM

Salve, Valeria Messalina, et salvete omnes,

Speaking of the lighter side ... I haven't seen a kitten report in way too
long! I trust they are thriving, treating their human "staff" with the
appropriate high handedness, and ruling their environment with steel claws
beneath velvet paws?

Have their tiny majesties (all cats are, by their very nature, royalty, you
know), deigned to allow themselves to be photographed? Do we have pictures?
Are their personalities starting to develop? Report, *please?* :).

C. Maria Caeca


Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66423 From: Steve Moore Date: 2009-06-07
Subject: Re: Commodum ex iniuria sua nemo habere debet

Salve, Lentule.

 

In your post below, you discuss how Censor A and Censor B might disagree. But this is really a truism, a statement of the obvious—it is the nature of collegial magistracies. All collegial magistrates (including myself, as Aedilis of an oppidum) have to work with their colleagues or nothing will get accomplished.

 

More importantly, this has nothing to do with whether Modianus was legally able to run for Censor—which is the real issue.

 

Vale,

Potitus

 


From: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com [mailto: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com ] On Behalf Of Cn. Cornelius Lentulus
Sent: Sunday, June 07, 2009 12:52 AM
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Subject: R: [Nova-Roma] Re: Commodum ex iniuria sua nemo habere debet

 




Policola and Potitus;

The censors can veto each other, two hostile censors can distruct the smooth working of the cohors. One censor can say "XY is my applicant, I decide over him", the other say, "no it's my appicant": what will then happen?

Modianus is not yet in the Cohors and he did not yet start to deal with citizenship applications. This is why there was no conflict so far. And I hope a reconciliation between the two censors will be why there will be no conflict later.

Two censors actively working on citizenship applications WITHOUT agreement is impossible. Either acknowledge each other's acts, or continuously fight about who decides what.

Both Potitus and Poplicola is right that we don't have to have two censors for processing citizenship application, in fact, we don't need even one, since the job is done by scribes. What Poplicola and Potitus doesn't know or understand it's that if once there are censors they CAN order their scribes to do anything, and if censor A says "I reject this application" , censor B says "No, I approve": or, A: "I approve this name", B: "No I don't". A: "I place all applicant with surnames beginning with letters A - M under my authority" B: "No, I don't allow them to you etc etc"...

So, if BOTH censors want authority over citizenship application, it is not possible without an agreement.

This is what I am talking about.




 

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66424 From: Matt Hucke Date: 2009-06-07
Subject: Re: Intercessio
In 1998, I became one of the first persons to join Nova Roma, aside from that
now-vanished core group who had known each other before the founding, and who
had envisioned a Republic.

In those days, the web site was a handful of pages, with no interactive features.
I printed an application and dropped it into a mailbox, then waited weeks for
confirmation.

According to a list posted by the now-departed L Equitius Cincinnatus AUGUR,
Gens Octavia was the sixth gens to be founded; thus I might be the sixth most
senior citizen, or the eighth (some gentes had more than one member at first,
and the early records are incomplete).

In the early days, there was a real sense of camaraderie and friendship. You can
see this in the photos from Roman Days 2002 and earlier, and in the mailing list
archives. We had plans, plans to build something that people would enjoy, something
that would be truly great. The future looked bright; Nova Roma would grow, and would
unite people, not divide them.

All of that is gone now; destroyed by politics and by an obsession with silly
made-up "laws", to the exclusion of all else.

Three years ago, my friend C. Minucius Scaevola was driven away by the wretched
Leges Saliciae, after someone humiliated and defeated in one of the routine battles
of words that plague this list decided to get even, and "sue" his adversary in
kangaroo court.

One year ago, those same ridiculous leges were used to drive away another of my
friends, L. Equitius Cincinnatus, on absurd trumped-up charges of "treason" -
something to do with not sharing the archives of a mailing list with a few dozen
messages from years ago.

Those evil bastards even stripped him of his name.

At about the same time, Pater Patriae M. Cassius Iulianus was removed from office
as Pontifex Maximus - a LIFETIME position - because he had been intermittently
out of contact for a few years. He was tossed aside like a used kleenex -
but NOT ONE OF YOU WOULD BE HERE IF NOT FOR HIM. Those who schemed to remove him
then appointed one of themselves to his title - but he is a pretender, an Antipope,
an abomination.

I left the Senate while this was happening. The title of "Senator" held no meaning,
no honour, no dignity; and I would not work for an organization that perpetrated
such injustice, such vendetta, and such endless, useless, fighting.

Today, things are worse than ever before. You now have a Tribune trying to
overturn the results of an election. You have a cabal of people who threaten
"lawsuit" at the drop of a hat, and who constantly mention their imaginary
sock-puppet attorneys who agree with everything they say.

The Leges Salicia still exist, though only the ruling class seems to care for
them; they're a useful tool for prosecuting "traitors".

Your web site is an unmaintained wreck. Nobody knows how to fix or upgrade
anything.

A permanent, self-nurturing, self-sustaining bureaucracy rotates its members in and
out of every top position. Gone are the men of vision; they were too independent
for the hivemind to tolerate.

Nova Roma is dead, naked and humiliated, found dangling in a closet from a noose
of its own devising; the noose of excessive "law" and endless arguments the minutiae
of that "law". Nova Roma has strangled itself in an masturbatory act of
auto-litigious asphyxiation.

Today, a tribune attempts to void an election result, because a small number of
people continue to insist on one particular interpretation of yet another badly
written law. Rathern than doing something useful with their lives, they'll
endlessly scream "illegal! everything you do is illegal!", as if the entire body
of Nova Roma law was actually more worthwhile, more meaningful, more important
than a bucket of warm piss. They threaten to involve real-world lawyers at the
drop of a hat.

Now, with the Tribune's act, even the pretense of democracy is gone. NR is
nothing more than a battle ground for these two factions, neither of which
has any morals, any restraint, any empathy for persons who are not 100%
in agreement with them.

Both factions are equally appalling.

I, the founder of the sixth gens on 1 March 1998, hereby renounce my citizenship.

No one cares, of course; I stopped being an active member long ago, and took a
long break from this list (in retrospect, I should not have returned).

Today I make it official, and I ask the two Censores to mark my status as "resigned".

Matt Hucke,
formerly M. Octavius Gracchus,
Twice Censor, once Consul,
Aedile, Senator, Propraetor,
Magister Araneum longer than anyone,
founder of the sixth gens,
citizen March 1998 - June 2009.


--
Matt Hucke (hucke@...), programmer.
author, Graveyards of Illinois - http://graveyards.com/
CYNICO.NET - hosting from $8.33/month; domains $13 - http://cynico.net/
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66425 From: Titus Iulius Sabinus Date: 2009-06-07
Subject: Re: Intercessio
SALVE AGRIPPA!

Frankly, I can not understand how you, a man with honor, was able to accept to destroy your reputation and to subordinate yourself acting this way!
Opinions were divided. Palladius who wrote the law confirmed that both opinions are valid. Voting, people decided.
Unbelievable! What a shame!

VALE,
T. Iulius Sabinus

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, canadaoccidentalis@... wrote:
>
>
> Tribunus Plebis Gaius Vipsanius Agrippa SPD
>
> I pronounce intercessio against the custodes Marcus Lucretius Agricola and Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus in certifying the election of Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus as censor and against the consuls Marcus Iulius Severus and Marcus Cornelius Complutensis in accepting the election results. 
>
> This action was requested by Senator Gnaeus Iulius Caesar, Senator Lucius Cornelius Sulla Felix, Quintus Valerius Poplicola, and Marcus Valerius Potitus.
>
> Modianus cannot hold the office of censor. This would violate Section 1 of the Lex Cornelia Iunia de definitione intervallorum magistratuum; "no person shall hold the office of censor consecutively" with Section IV A of the constitution as the definition of the term 'office of censor'.
>
> As the Lex Cornelia Iunia de definitione intervallorum magistratuum does not define the term 'office of censor', the Constitution is used by virtue of Section I B, giving precedence to the constitution as the highest legal authority.
>
> The censorship is measured in a 2 year term and cannot be subdivided. Modianus cannot hold the office consecutively.
>
> Gaius Vipsanius Agrippa
> Tribunus Plebis
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66426 From: Publius Ullerius Stephanus Venator Date: 2009-06-07
Subject: Re: Intercessio
Avete Omnes;

I ask the other tribunes, as a long time Cives Nova Roma, to help
things move along by opposing this Intercession.

I was a voice, albeit a fairly quiet one, in opposition to the
candidacy of Modianus for Censor.

I still believe the Law under which his candidacy was touted as legal
and opposed as illegal is poorly written and too open to
interpretation. Our Laws need clarity, brevity and simplicity. Law
must not only be for the lawyers, it must be primarily for the
understanding by and protection of the People.

We must needs not try and cover every situation; having macronational
law, statute and regulation, which supersedes what we do here.

However, the Vox Populi has been heard, and is that not the true
foundation of any Res Publica? If the People do not contest the
legitimacy of a Law, it stands.

The majority of the People, by their resounding silence, also lent
tacit approval to the candidacy of Modianus. This intercession is, in
my opinion, an ex post facto attempt at what should have been resolved
during the discussion before the Cista opened.

By the vote count and tally, Modianus has the confidence of a majority
of the members of the Centuries.

Yes, this note has an air of resignation about it; what's done is
done, que sera, sera.

There are problems, which need to be addressed, and I will try better
to be a part of the solution. I am not considering leaving, neither
the Senate, the Lictorship nor Nova Roma, though I will step back from
committee and scribal appointments to ponder things. (...and, yes, I
realize I'd already been a bit withdrawn in those arenas already.) I
need time to think.

To my friends herein, I know this is unexpected, but did you really
see something different coming, in light of my nature?

I have made no enemies in Nova Roma, though there are a few who I find
useless to the future of our endeavor. I shall no longer respond to
them, neither directly nor indirectly, neither here nor elsewhere.

In closing, I ask again that the other Tribunes block this
Intercession and be more proactive in the future.

=========================================
In amicitia et fides -
Publius Ullerius Stephanus Venator
Civis circa Quintilis MMDCCLI a.u.c.
Senator et Lictor

Religio Septentrionalis - Poeta
---------------------------------
May the Holy Powers smile on our efforts.
May the Spirits of our family lines nod in approval.
May we be of Worth to our fellow Nova Romans.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66427 From: Titus Iulius Sabinus Date: 2009-06-07
Subject: Re: to Octavius.
SALVE!

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Matt Hucke <hucke@...> wrote:

> I, the founder of the sixth gens on 1 March 1998, hereby renounce my citizenship.
>
> No one cares, of course; I stopped being an active member long ago, and took a long break from this list (in retrospect, I should not have returned).>>>

Well, I care. Your decision is your decision, I can't do anything here, but you have my respect. I'm very able to understand how much time and excellent work you dedicated to NR benefit. My personal thanks for that and you are welcome anytime in Romania as my guest. Nova Roma is the occasion but not the cause of the friendship among people.

VALE BENE,
T. Iulius Sabinus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66428 From: Steve Moore Date: 2009-06-07
Subject: Re: Intercessio

M. Valerius Potitus omnibus SPD.

 

I want to publicly thank Tribune Agrippa for pronouncing intercessio as requested by two Senators and two citizens.

 

I have written to each of the remaining Tribunes to ask them to pronounce intercessio as well.

 

I would like to make it clear that the intercessio is NOT saying that the election was illegal or mishandled, etc. The intercessio is NOT trying to silence the vox populi. Instead, the intercessio is saying that Modinaus was not eligible to run for Censor.

 

To some people, this is a battle about words in an allegedly poorly written law. But no matter how poorly the law may be written, the intent of the law is clear—it is not in the best interest of Nova Roma to have one person serve two terms in a row as Censor. If the law is poorly written, then the answer is to amend or replace the law—the answer is NOT to ignore the law’s intent and use the (alleged) poor wording to violate the intent.

 

Take this example. We have laws that regulate the minimum ages for various offices. Why? Because it is in the best interest of Nova Roma. No doubt there are some 20 year olds who would be much better magistrates than some 40 year olds. But, by and large, it is better to have magistrates who are older and (presumably) more mature. That’s why we have the laws.

 

So, let’s say that a 21 year old citizen wants to run for Censor. She clearly is not eligible. Now let’s say that a group of citizens says that the laws about minimum age requirements are poorly written and can be interpreted as menaing that a 21 year old can run, even without the exemption allowed by the law. Further, let’s say the Consuls accept her candidacy and the People elect her. Despite all this, she is still ineligible and cannot serve.

 

Valete,

Potitus

 

 


From: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com [mailto: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com ] On Behalf Of canadaoccidentalis@...
Sent: Sunday, June 07, 2009 7:32 AM
To: Nova Roma; novaroma-announce@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Intercessio

 





Tribunus Plebis Gaius Vipsanius Agrippa SPD

I pronounce intercessio against the custodes Marcus Lucretius Agricola and Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus in certifying the election of Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus as censor and against the consuls Marcus Iulius Severus and Marcus Cornelius Complutensis in accepting the election results. 

This action was requested by Senator Gnaeus Iulius Caesar, Senator Lucius Cornelius Sulla Felix, Quintus Valerius Poplicola, and Marcus Valerius Potitus.

Modianus cannot hold the office of censor. This would violate Section 1 of the Lex Cornelia Iunia de definitione intervallorum magistratuum; "no person shall hold the office of censor consecutively" with Section IV A of the constitution as the definition of the term 'office of censor'.

As the Lex Cornelia Iunia de definitione intervallorum magistratuum does not define the term 'office of censor', the Constitution is used by virtue of Section I B, giving precedence to the constitution as the highest legal authority.

The censorship is measured in a 2 year term and cannot be subdivided. Modianus cannot hold the office consecutively.

Gaius Vipsanius Agrippa
Tribunus Plebis

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66429 From: Publius Ullerius Stephanus Venator Date: 2009-06-07
Subject: Re: Intercessio
Ave Potitus;

Unfortunately, we are presented with a fait accompli and a remedy
after the fact is no remedy at all.

Valete - Venator
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66430 From: Gnaeus Iulius Caesar Date: 2009-06-07
Subject: Re: Intercessio
Cn. Iulius Caesar T. Iulio Sabino SPD
 
If you believe both opinions are valid, not a view I share, but as you advance that position, then Tribune Agrippa is entitled to his view as well, isn't he? Palladius I think said his intention was to prevent a candidacy like this but he could see how the law could be interpreted to mean what the adherents of Modianus said it meant. None the less his intention was to prevent it and one Tribune has acted according to his constitutional right. The system is working exactly how it was meant to work.
 
To talk of him having his reputation destroyed because as Tribune he exercised that right is a little excessive. Its rather similar to a man whose friends encourage him to break the window in a jewelry store and run off with a necklace. He breaks the window and runs off with it. The alarm on the shop sounds. Pedestrians shout "Police!" The police arrive and arrest the robber. Then a friend of the robber steps forward and tells the police that they have no honour because they arrested him, as all his friends and associates and people standing nearby said it was ok to break the window. No, it wasn't ok. Public approbation for law breaking doesn't validate the act. An illegal act is an illegal act.
 
Sometimes Tribunes agree with requests for intercessio, sometimes they don't. If the intercessio stands, look not to blame the Tribunes or the people that called for the intercessio, which is our right to do so, but blame the decision making process that allowed this candidacy in the first place.
 
Optime vale.

Sent: Sunday, June 07, 2009 10:56 AM
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Intercessio

SALVE AGRIPPA!

Frankly, I can not understand how you, a man with honor, was able to accept to destroy your reputation and to subordinate yourself acting this way!
Opinions were divided. Palladius who wrote the law confirmed that both opinions are valid. Voting, people decided.
Unbelievable! What a shame!

VALE,
T. Iulius Sabinus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66431 From: Maxima Valeria Messallina Date: 2009-06-07
Subject: Re: Intercessio
Salve, Venator
 
As always, you offer us words of wisdom. Thank you.
 
Maxima Valeria Messallina
Sacerdos Vestalis


--- On Sun, 6/7/09, Publius Ullerius Stephanus Venator <famila.ulleria.venii@...> wrote:

From: Publius Ullerius Stephanus Venator <famila.ulleria.venii@...>
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Intercessio
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Date: Sunday, June 7, 2009, 10:34 AM

Ave Potitus;

Unfortunately, we are presented with a fait accompli and a remedy
after the fact is no remedy at all.

Valete - Venator

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66432 From: violetphearsen@yahoo.com Date: 2009-06-07
Subject: Speaking of Mockingbirds
And we were speaking of mockingbirds at one point on the ML. I found this interesting article about mockingbirds. I always knew they were smart birds as well as clean ones.
 
Maxima Valeria Messallina

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66433 From: C. Maria Caeca Date: 2009-06-07
Subject: Re: Speaking of Mockingbirds
Salve Valeria Messalina, et salvete omnes,
 
Thanks for posting that article.  Um, I thought, though (not that it matters) that our discussion was on the RR list?  At any rate, nice article!  I do enjoy my mockingbird, and I think there might be mockingbird families in the area that I wasn't aware of.  This interests me because I live in an extremely urban area, where good trees are scarce, where traffic is noisy and ubiquitous, and where sirens seem to pass every few minutes.  Hearing them always brings me back into balance, and makes me smile, no matter what is besetting me.
 
So again, gratias tibi ago,
 
Maria Caeca
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Sunday, June 07, 2009 3:03 PM
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Speaking of Mockingbirds

And we were speaking of mockingbirds at one point on the ML. I found this interesting article about mockingbirds. I always knew they were smart birds as well as clean ones.
 
Maxima Valeria Messallina

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66434 From: C. Maria Caeca Date: 2009-06-07
Subject: Re: kitten report?
Salve Maxima Valeria Messelina et salvete omnes,
 
Um, you do realize, yes, that, if kittens come to a ritual ... they *will* take it over? Kittens have their ways, you know!  Of course, the up side to that is ... that whatever they do, it will be absolutely perfect, especially since these are NovRomanae kittens!
 
Vale et valete,
C. Maria Caeca
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Sunday, June 07, 2009 11:40 AM
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] kitten report?

The kittens are doing very well. I spoke with our friend who is caring for them and she reports the kittens have been weaned and are eating kitten food like it's going out of style. Naturally, being babies still, they make a mess sliding the dishes all over the place. I haven't been given any pictures yet, but they have been given their Roman names.
The boy kittens have been named Caelius, Felix and Numa.
The girl kittens have been named Diana, Palatina and Tullia.
We've nicknamed them the Argei Micine.
I'll ask our friend for pictures when I see her at our Vestalia ritual on Tuesday. I told her to bring the kittens so they can be present at the ritual and we can visit with them afterwards. Should make for a fun day. :)
 
Vale bene in pace Deorum,
 
Maxima Valeria Messallina


--- On Sun, 5/31/09, C. Maria Caeca <shoshanahathaway@...> wrote:

From: C. Maria Caeca <shoshanahathaway@...>
Subject: [Nova-Roma] kitten report?
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Date: Sunday, May 31, 2009, 3:05 PM

Salve, Valeria Messalina, et salvete omnes,

Speaking of the lighter side ... I haven't seen a kitten report in way too
long! I trust they are thriving, treating their human "staff" with the
appropriate high handedness, and ruling their environment with steel claws
beneath velvet paws?

Have their tiny majesties (all cats are, by their very nature, royalty, you
know), deigned to allow themselves to be photographed? Do we have pictures?
Are their personalities starting to develop? Report, *please?* :).

C. Maria Caeca




No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 8.5.339 / Virus Database: 270.12.55/2160 - Release Date: 06/07/09 05:53:00

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66435 From: wuffa2001 Date: 2009-06-07
Subject: Re: kitten report?
Salve

and is there somwhere we can send funds for the support of the kittens?

Vale Marcus Cornelius Felix





--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, violetphearsen@... wrote:
>
>
> The kittens are doing very well. I spoke with our friend who is caring for them and she reports the kittens have been weaned and are eating kitten food like it's going out of style. Naturally, being babies still, they make a mess sliding the dishes all over the place. I haven't been given any pictures yet, but they have been given their Roman names.
> The boy kittens have been named Caelius, Felix and Numa.
> The girl kittens have been named Diana, Palatina and Tullia.
> We've nicknamed them the Argei Micine.
> I'll ask our friend for pictures when I see her at our Vestalia ritual on Tuesday. I told her to bring the kittens so they can be present at the ritual and we can visit with them afterwards. Should make for a fun day. :)
>  
> Vale bene in pace Deorum,
>  
> Maxima Valeria Messallina
>  
>
> --- On Sun, 5/31/09, C. Maria Caeca <shoshanahathaway@...> wrote:
>
>
> From: C. Maria Caeca <shoshanahathaway@...>
> Subject: [Nova-Roma] kitten report?
> To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> Date: Sunday, May 31, 2009, 3:05 PM
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Salve, Valeria Messalina, et salvete omnes,
>
> Speaking of the lighter side ... I haven't seen a kitten report in way too
> long! I trust they are thriving, treating their human "staff" with the
> appropriate high handedness, and ruling their environment with steel claws
> beneath velvet paws?
>
> Have their tiny majesties (all cats are, by their very nature, royalty, you
> know), deigned to allow themselves to be photographed? Do we have pictures?
> Are their personalities starting to develop? Report, *please?* :).
>
> C. Maria Caeca
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66436 From: Maxima Valeria Messallina Date: 2009-06-07
Subject: Re: kitten report?
I'll ask. Thank you.
 
MVM

--- On Sun, 6/7/09, wuffa2001 <magewuffa@...> wrote:

From: wuffa2001 <magewuffa@...>
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: kitten report?
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Date: Sunday, June 7, 2009, 12:04 PM

Salve

and is there somwhere we can send funds for the support of the kittens?

Vale Marcus Cornelius Felix

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com, violetphearsen@ ... wrote:
>
>
> The kittens are doing very well. I spoke with our friend who is caring for them and she reports the kittens have been weaned and are eating kitten food like it's going out of style. Naturally, being babies still, they make a mess sliding the dishes all over the place. I haven't been given any pictures yet, but they have been given their Roman names.
> The boy kittens have been named Caelius, Felix and Numa.
> The girl kittens have been named Diana, Palatina and Tullia.
> We've nicknamed them the Argei Micine.
> I'll ask our friend for pictures when I see her at our Vestalia ritual on Tuesday. I told her to bring the kittens so they can be present at the ritual and we can visit with them afterwards. Should make for a fun day. :)
>  
> Vale bene in pace Deorum,
>  
> Maxima Valeria Messallina
>  
>
> --- On Sun, 5/31/09, C. Maria Caeca <shoshanahathaway@ ...> wrote:
>
>
> From: C. Maria Caeca <shoshanahathaway@ ...>
> Subject: [Nova-Roma] kitten report?
> To: Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com
> Date: Sunday, May 31, 2009, 3:05 PM
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Salve, Valeria Messalina, et salvete omnes,
>
> Speaking of the lighter side ... I haven't seen a kitten report in way too
> long! I trust they are thriving, treating their human "staff" with the
> appropriate high handedness, and ruling their environment with steel claws
> beneath velvet paws?
>
> Have their tiny majesties (all cats are, by their very nature, royalty, you
> know), deigned to allow themselves to be photographed? Do we have pictures?
> Are their personalities starting to develop? Report, *please?* :).
>
> C. Maria Caeca
>


Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66437 From: Maxima Valeria Messallina Date: 2009-06-07
Subject: Re: Speaking of Mockingbirds
Oh! I think you are right. We were over on that list discussing mockingbirds. My goof! LOL (I shall copy this over onto the RR list, for those interested.)
I love all our birds, but I have noticed over the years the decrease in the bird population here in southern California. Gone are the Blue Jays, the Bluebirds, the Goldfinches, at least where I live; not to mention the Garter Snakes, which are really a type of legless lizard, all the frogs, possums, raccoons, moles and our beautiful gray owls, which were only about as big as my hand, roughly 7 to 8 inches in height. Even our sparrows, once so populous, are few in number these days. What do seem to survive are the mockingbirds. They must have amazing tenacity. I hope they can survive our urban sprawl, because the day there are no more mockingbirds will be a very sad day indeed.
 
Maxima Valeria Messallina 
 
 

--- On Sun, 6/7/09, C. Maria Caeca <shoshanahathaway@...> wrote:

From: C. Maria Caeca <shoshanahathaway@...>
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Speaking of Mockingbirds
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Date: Sunday, June 7, 2009, 12:15 PM

Salve Valeria Messalina, et salvete omnes,
 
Thanks for posting that article.  Um, I thought, though (not that it matters) that our discussion was on the RR list?  At any rate, nice article!  I do enjoy my mockingbird, and I think there might be mockingbird families in the area that I wasn't aware of.  This interests me because I live in an extremely urban area, where good trees are scarce, where traffic is noisy and ubiquitous, and where sirens seem to pass every few minutes.  Hearing them always brings me back into balance, and makes me smile, no matter what is besetting me.
 
So again, gratias tibi ago,
 
Maria Caeca
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Sunday, June 07, 2009 3:03 PM
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Speaking of Mockingbirds

And we were speaking of mockingbirds at one point on the ML. I found this interesting article about mockingbirds. I always knew they were smart birds as well as clean ones.
 
Maxima Valeria Messallina


Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66438 From: Diana Octavia Aventina Date: 2009-06-07
Subject: Re: kitten report?
Salve Maxima Valeria,

Thanks for the update!
And a nice choice of names too.

>Naturally, being babies still, they make a mess sliding the dishes all over
>the place.
I have always fed my kittens in paper plates so that the dish would not be
too high for them, but then they stand right in the middle of the dish.
Messy, but cute....

Vale,
Diana
----- Original Message -----
From: <violetphearsen@...>
To: <Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Sunday, June 07, 2009 5:40 PM
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] kitten report?



The kittens are doing very well. I spoke with our friend who is caring for
them and she reports the kittens have been weaned and are eating kitten food
like it's going out of style. Naturally, being babies still, they make a
mess sliding the dishes all over the place. I haven't been given any
pictures yet, but they have been given their Roman names.
The boy kittens have been named Caelius, Felix and Numa.
The girl kittens have been named Diana, Palatina and Tullia.
We've nicknamed them the Argei Micine.
I'll ask our friend for pictures when I see her at our Vestalia ritual on
Tuesday. I told her to bring the kittens so they can be present at the
ritual and we can visit with them afterwards. Should make for a fun day. :)

Vale bene in pace Deorum,

Maxima Valeria Messallina


--- On Sun, 5/31/09, C. Maria Caeca <shoshanahathaway@...> wrote:


From: C. Maria Caeca <shoshanahathaway@...>
Subject: [Nova-Roma] kitten report?
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Date: Sunday, May 31, 2009, 3:05 PM








Salve, Valeria Messalina, et salvete omnes,

Speaking of the lighter side ... I haven't seen a kitten report in way too
long! I trust they are thriving, treating their human "staff" with the
appropriate high handedness, and ruling their environment with steel claws
beneath velvet paws?

Have their tiny majesties (all cats are, by their very nature, royalty, you
know), deigned to allow themselves to be photographed? Do we have pictures?
Are their personalities starting to develop? Report, *please?* :).

C. Maria Caeca
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66439 From: Diana Octavia Aventina Date: 2009-06-07
Subject: Following in my Pater's footsteps
Salvete all,

Following the footsteps of my Paterfamilias, Marcus Octavius, I hereby
renouce my citizenship in Nova Roma. He was my favorite person in NR for the
last 10 years and now he is gone too. This is the straw that has broken the
camels back.
I first found this mailing list in May of 1999 and we had fun then and a
goal. Now the only goal is to argue about who will have control of a group
that only argues. We are a joke amongst other Roman groups and yet the
people here keep arguing, now more than ever since Sulla is back. I want no
part of it anymore.

Sulla, I wish that you never come back. Send me all the hate mail that you
want, and call me a back stabber because I don't give a crap what you say. I
was never a freind of yours anyway. Our Vesta was right when she said that
you were a cancer. You and Poplicola and a few others are intent on killing
NR and you are doing a good job of it.

Vale,
Joanne Agate
formerly Diana Octavia Aventina
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66440 From: aerdensrw Date: 2009-06-07
Subject: Re: Intercessio
I could be wrong, as I am not a lawyer, but I believe that, in general, one must judge a law's meaning by what is explicit in it, not by what is implicit.

If the law applicable to determining Modianu' candidacy needs to be changed, let it be changed in the proper way so that the requirements for censorship candidacy will be clear and precise for future candidates.

We should not attempt to correct poorly-written legislation by overturning an election by the people. The people made their choice known; that choice should be allowed to stand.

The Comitia Centuriata election was supposed to settle this matter. If the election did not settle the matter, I begin to question why we have elections in Nova Roma, if their clear results can be endlessly disputed. Can the people's voice be so easily made irrelevant by those who disagree with the majority?

Trying to correct a law by backtracking after the people have already spoken is bad form, and it is more harmful to us than simply working with the results and forging ahead productively would be.

I ask the remaining tribuns to oppose this intercession.

Paulla Corva Gaudialis
Diribitrix suffecta
Lictrix curiata


--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Steve Moore" <astrobear@...> wrote:
>
> M. Valerius Potitus omnibus SPD.
>
>
>
> I want to publicly thank Tribune Agrippa for pronouncing intercessio as
> requested by two Senators and two citizens.
>
>
>
> I have written to each of the remaining Tribunes to ask them to pronounce
> intercessio as well.
>
>
>
> I would like to make it clear that the intercessio is NOT saying that the
> election was illegal or mishandled, etc. The intercessio is NOT trying to
> silence the vox populi. Instead, the intercessio is saying that Modinaus was
> not eligible to run for Censor.
>
>
>
> To some people, this is a battle about words in an allegedly poorly written
> law. But no matter how poorly the law may be written, the intent of the law
> is clear-it is not in the best interest of Nova Roma to have one person
> serve two terms in a row as Censor. If the law is poorly written, then the
> answer is to amend or replace the law-the answer is NOT to ignore the law's
> intent and use the (alleged) poor wording to violate the intent.
>
>
>
> Take this example. We have laws that regulate the minimum ages for various
> offices. Why? Because it is in the best interest of Nova Roma. No doubt
> there are some 20 year olds who would be much better magistrates than some
> 40 year olds. But, by and large, it is better to have magistrates who are
> older and (presumably) more mature. That's why we have the laws.
>
>
>
> So, let's say that a 21 year old citizen wants to run for Censor. She
> clearly is not eligible. Now let's say that a group of citizens says that
> the laws about minimum age requirements are poorly written and can be
> interpreted as menaing that a 21 year old can run, even without the
> exemption allowed by the law. Further, let's say the Consuls accept her
> candidacy and the People elect her. Despite all this, she is still
> ineligible and cannot serve.
>
>
>
> Valete,
>
> Potitus
>
>
>
>
>
> _____
>
> From: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com [mailto:Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf
> Of canadaoccidentalis@...
> Sent: Sunday, June 07, 2009 7:32 AM
> To: Nova Roma; novaroma-announce@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [Nova-Roma] Intercessio
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Tribunus Plebis Gaius Vipsanius Agrippa SPD
>
> I pronounce intercessio against the custodes Marcus Lucretius Agricola and
> Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus in certifying the election of Caeso Fabius Buteo
> Modianus as censor and against the consuls Marcus Iulius Severus and Marcus
> Cornelius Complutensis in accepting the election results.
>
> This action was requested by Senator Gnaeus Iulius Caesar, Senator Lucius
> Cornelius Sulla Felix, Quintus Valerius Poplicola, and Marcus Valerius
> Potitus.
>
> Modianus cannot hold the office of censor. This would violate Section 1 of
> the Lex Cornelia Iunia de definitione intervallorum magistratuum; "no person
> shall hold the office of censor consecutively" with Section IV A of the
> constitution as the definition of the term 'office of censor'.
>
> As the Lex Cornelia Iunia de definitione intervallorum magistratuum does not
> define the term 'office of censor', the Constitution is used by virtue of
> Section I B, giving precedence to the constitution as the highest legal
> authority.
>
> The censorship is measured in a 2 year term and cannot be subdivided.
> Modianus cannot hold the office consecutively.
>
> Gaius Vipsanius Agrippa
> Tribunus Plebis
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66441 From: Titus Iulius Sabinus Date: 2009-06-07
Subject: Re: Intercessio
T. Iulius Sabinus Cn. Iulio Caesari SPD

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Gnaeus Iulius Caesar" <gn_iulius_caesar@...> wrote:

> If you believe both opinions are valid, not a view I share, but as you advance that position, then Tribune Agrippa is entitled to his view as well, isn't he?>>>

General speaking, yes, he is entitled to his view anytime and anywhere. Views are views.
Here we have a view + an action, so:
In our specific case no, because the view is followed by an action. He is tribunus and under the Fabia centuriata there was a clear determinate time for his opinion and action.

Palladius I think said his intention was to prevent a candidacy like this but he could see how the law could be interpreted to mean what the adherents of Modianus said it meant. None the less his intention was to prevent it and one Tribune has acted according to his constitutional right. The system is working exactly how it was meant to work.>>>

Here we enter again in the law interpretation. Personaly I don't have the same view with you about consecutive terms. That's all, different opinions.

> To talk of him having his reputation destroyed because as Tribune he exercised that right is a little excessive.>>>

He had the right at one moment. Trying to do now what was possible then, is, as many other pointed out, the equivalent of repairing the damage (but I don't believe it was a damage) with another one. Octavius presented in a very lucid way the consequences.
Nobody, but nobody can imagine how much it hurts me to say something about Agrippa. Nobody!!!!!

>Its rather similar to a man whose friends encourage him to break the window in a jewelry store and run off with a necklace. He breaks the window and runs off with it. The alarm on the shop sounds. Pedestrians shout "Police!" The police arrive and arrest the robber. Then a friend of the robber steps forward and tells the police that they have no honour because they arrested him, as all his friends and associates and people standing nearby said it was ok to break the window. No, it wasn't ok. Public approbation for law breaking doesn't validate the act. An illegal act is an illegal act.>>>

Your example is well and logical structured based of your perception where all outside the system are potential offenders. I know the feeling and I observed it maybe in more amplified versions because other specific conditions. If some of our nova roman co-fellows, because a different opinion, are categorized as the offender accomplices (that is the logical deduction of your example), well, my friend, believe me that there is a problem. Try to think to that and you will understand what I want to say.

> Sometimes Tribunes agree with requests for intercessio, sometimes they don't. If the intercessio stands, look not to blame the Tribunes or the people that called for the intercessio, which is our right to do so, but blame the decision making process that allowed this candidacy in the first place.>>>

I'm sorry to say, but I will blame them.

VALE ET VALETE,
T. Iulius Sabinus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66442 From: David Kling Date: 2009-06-07
Subject: Re: Intercessio
Salvete:

The results of a comita cannot be vetoed after a vote.  They must, according to law, be vetoed during the contio.  The other tribunes should understand this and correct their colleague.  The custodes do not issue edicts, they simply certify the results that are sent out by the diribitores.  There are a few people calling for "intercessio" but the majority of Nova Roma (ie., the centuries) are opposed to that.

Some will claim "follow the law" "follow the law" but only when it works for them.  The law states veto can happen during a contio. 

Valete:

Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus

On Sun, Jun 7, 2009 at 4:17 PM, aerdensrw <aerdensrw@...> wrote:


I could be wrong, as I am not a lawyer, but I believe that, in general, one must judge a law's meaning by what is explicit in it, not by what is implicit.

If the law applicable to determining Modianu' candidacy needs to be changed, let it be changed in the proper way so that the requirements for censorship candidacy will be clear and precise for future candidates.

We should not attempt to correct poorly-written legislation by overturning an election by the people. The people made their choice known; that choice should be allowed to stand.

The Comitia Centuriata election was supposed to settle this matter. If the election did not settle the matter, I begin to question why we have elections in Nova Roma, if their clear results can be endlessly disputed. Can the people's voice be so easily made irrelevant by those who disagree with the majority?

Trying to correct a law by backtracking after the people have already spoken is bad form, and it is more harmful to us than simply working with the results and forging ahead productively would be.

I ask the remaining tribuns to oppose this intercession.

Paulla Corva Gaudialis
Diribitrix suffecta
Lictrix curiata




Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66443 From: Gaius Petronius Dexter Date: 2009-06-07
Subject: Re: Request for Tribunician intercessio
C. Petronius C. Catoni salutem dicit,

>>> For the record, Petronius Dexter, I have not said a word regarding this since the results were announced; I would ask you to either withdraw or restate your declaration.<<<

When I said "the resentment of a bad loser", I spoke about Cn. Caesar not about you. Cn. Caesar indeed is not fair play with the result of the election nor with the choice of the centuries.

He is a "bad loser".

You, Cato, you are only the loser of this election.

Vale.

C. Petronius Dexter
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66444 From: Gnaeus Iulius Caesar Date: 2009-06-07
Subject: Re: Intercessio
Cn. Iulius Caesar T. Iulio Sabino SPD.
 
One of the purposes of the Tribunate in Nova Roma is to be a watchdog for the Constitution and the law. They are in many cases the final arbiters of issues pertaining to what is constitutional or unconstitutional, illegal or illegal. In Nova Roma the supreme legal authority is the Constitution. The people can vote to change it, through the approved process, but until they do it stands, or should do, over everything and everyone. It isn't Roman, and we all know that, but this is what we have.
 
As to my example - the offender analogy was meant to draw attention to the principle that those charged with oversight and enforcement often have a job to do that many may disagree with, but that is why we have tribunes, to police the constitution. In our system it doesn't matter if 1 of 10 or 100 or even 1000 people disagree with them, that is their job. Sometimes we all wish they had made different decisions, but that doesn't invalidate their right to make them, nor your right to feel as you do, or mine to feel as I do.
 
Optime vale
 

Sent: Sunday, June 07, 2009 2:28 PM
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Intercessio

T. Iulius Sabinus Cn. Iulio Caesari SPD

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Gnaeus Iulius Caesar" <gn_iulius_caesar@...> wrote:

> If you believe
both opinions are valid, not a view I share, but as you advance that position, then Tribune Agrippa is entitled to his view as well, isn't he?>>>

General speaking, yes, he is entitled to his view anytime and anywhere. Views are views.
Here we have a view + an action, so:
In our specific case no, because the view is followed by an action. He is tribunus and under the Fabia centuriata there was a clear determinate time for his opinion and action.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66445 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2009-06-07
Subject: Re: Request for Tribunician intercessio
Cato Petronio Dextero sal.

Salve!

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Gaius Petronius Dexter" <jfarnoud94@...> wrote:

> You, Cato, you are only the loser of this election.


Well...that makes me feel much better LOL

Vale!

Cato
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66446 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2009-06-07
Subject: Re: Request for Tribunician intercessio
Actually, I think the consuls are the big losers in this election. They haven't been able to do a senate call correctly. They have not done this election correctly. They have continually screwed the pooch on everything they have done. Even the illegal board of directors summons by Marinus was illegal, per Maine law. This situation could have been resolved if the consuls followed the Lex Fabia and properly vetted Modianus. Instead, they let the waves drift and chose inaction instead of leadership. It is their fault.

Vale,

Sulla

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Gaius Petronius Dexter" <jfarnoud94@...> wrote:
>
> C. Petronius C. Catoni salutem dicit,
>
> >>> For the record, Petronius Dexter, I have not said a word regarding this since the results were announced; I would ask you to either withdraw or restate your declaration.<<<
>
> When I said "the resentment of a bad loser", I spoke about Cn. Caesar not about you. Cn. Caesar indeed is not fair play with the result of the election nor with the choice of the centuries.
>
> He is a "bad loser".
>
> You, Cato, you are only the loser of this election.
>
> Vale.
>
> C. Petronius Dexter
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66447 From: Gnaeus Iulius Caesar Date: 2009-06-07
Subject: Re: Intercessio
Cn. Iulius Caesar SPD.
 
The rights of the Tribunes are enshrined in the Constitution. The law does NOT state that the results MUST be vetoed during contio only. Its says:
 
"During the Contio, the following conditions shall apply: ....Those constitutionally empowered to do so may exercise their powers of intercessio or obnuntiatio."
 
That is all it says. It does not bind the Tribunes to ONLY veto during contio. It states they 'may", which is redundant anyway as they have that right under the Constitution which states:
 
" To pronounce intercessio (intercession; a veto) against the actions of any other magistrate"
 
Their sweeping right to pronounce intercessio cannot be restricted unless the constitution were to allow a lex to curtail their rights. It does not. No lex can restrict that right by virtue of Section I.B of the Constitution, which makes the Constitution and its provisions supreme over any lex. In this case anyway the lex does not even attempt to restrict the Tribunes to pronouncing intercessio only during contio.
 
The Tribunes can pronounce intercessio at any time.
 
Optime vale
 

Sent: Sunday, June 07, 2009 2:37 PM
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: Intercessio

Salvete:

The results of a comita cannot be vetoed after a vote.  They must, according to law, be vetoed during the contio.  The other tribunes should understand this and correct their colleague.  The custodes do not issue edicts, they simply certify the results that are sent out by the diribitores.  There are a few people calling for "intercessio" but the majority of Nova Roma (ie., the centuries) are opposed to that.

Some will claim "follow the law" "follow the law" but only when it works for them.  The law states veto can happen during a contio. 

Valete:

Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66448 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2009-06-07
Subject: Re: Intercessio
Salvete omnes,

While I appreciate that Tribune Agrippa is acting according to his conscience here, I can not bring myself to accept a Tribune interposing his tribunician veto against the certified will of the electorate in *any* election held within Nova Roma. It is especially inappropriate for a Tribune to attempt to interfere with the results of the Comitia Centuriata, but it would also be wrong if a Tribune attempted to veto the results of an election in the Comitia Plebis Tributa or the Comitia Populi Tributa.

I ask the other tribunes of the plebs to act decisively and overturn this intercessio. Furthermore, I ask those senators and citizens who thought it was a good idea to seek our Tribune Agrippa's help to reconsider their reasoning, and withdraw their request to him. The time to veto a candidate is before an election, not after one. There was ample time during the contio for action, and the questions about Modianus' candidacy that were raised then were answered. Seeking to prolong the division within our community by arguing the definition of the word "consecutive" does nothing to improve Nova Roma or the Pax Deorum. Overturn this unfortunate intercessio and let's move forward.

Valete,

Gn. Equit. Marinus


--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, canadaoccidentalis@... wrote:
>
>
> Tribunus Plebis Gaius Vipsanius Agrippa SPD
>
> I pronounce intercessio against the custodes Marcus Lucretius Agricola and Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus in certifying the election of Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus as censor and against the consuls Marcus Iulius Severus and Marcus Cornelius Complutensis in accepting the election results. 
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66449 From: Charlie Collins Date: 2009-06-07
Subject: The Recent Election and Other Events
Priscus Omnibus sal.

While I did vote for Cato I find that there is way TOO MUCH acrimony
going on between certain individuals (you know who you are). The
election is over and like it or not the people have spoken. Modianus
IS our Censor (again like it or not). Illegal or Legal, the people
have again spoken (all of the acrimony that was going on changed a lot
of peoples minds). With the departure of Marcus Octavius and Diana
Octavia Aventina, I think this whole affair
has gone way TOO far. I ask everyone involved to step back and calm
down. Again, I say like it or not the People have spoken and Modianus
is our Censor and should be treated as such. I know I am not going to
make some happy with this stance but I see too much anger on this list
and if some comes my way so be it.

Optime Valete,
Quintus Servilius Priscus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66450 From: C. Maria Caeca Date: 2009-06-07
Subject: thank you!
Salvete omnes,

It seems that I owe a debt of gratitude to someone, but I don't know who.
So, to someone very kind, thank you for finishing the job of uploading my
photo to the Album Civium! I do apologize for messing up the job, though.

C. Maria Caeca
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66451 From: Q. Valerius Poplicola Date: 2009-06-07
Subject: Re: thank you!
That would be M. Agricola who did that for you.

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "C. Maria Caeca" <shoshanahathaway@...> wrote:
>
> Salvete omnes,
>
> It seems that I owe a debt of gratitude to someone, but I don't know who.
> So, to someone very kind, thank you for finishing the job of uploading my
> photo to the Album Civium! I do apologize for messing up the job, though.
>
> C. Maria Caeca
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66452 From: Gnaeus Iulius Caesar Date: 2009-06-07
Subject: Re: Intercessio
Cn. Iulius Caesar Cn. Equitio Marino SPD
 
I beg to differ. Yes there are two differing views on "consecutive". The authors of the law both agreed this was exactly the sort of situation they had tried to prevent. The wording allows at face value for two viewpoints. However it hinged on the definition of "office of censor". The lex provided no definition. I have pointed out the Constitution defines office of Censor as ONE term of 24 months, and by its wording clearly does not divide that 24 month period into separate sections.
 
To date no one has countered that interpretation of the Constitution, nor its power under Section 1.B to thus provide the missing definition in the lex. Nothing was decided Marine, the views to the contrary were ignored. Fine. So we ploughed on with an election. Unless you can refute the above, then the law is clear, he cannot stand and regardless of any vote in Comitia the law stands, for that is our system in Nova Roma. Inconvenient? Sure. A mess? Sure. That is not justification for ignoring the Constitution and the law. If the intercessio is over turned, fine. I'll live with that, but it won't make Modianus legally Censor. A vote in Comitia does not invalidate the law.
 
As to the timing, well the Tribunes were not asked in time from the 72 hour period, but I think one made his views clear on both candidates and the whole election. The fact a veto did not happen at that time cannot therefore be taken to imply consent of the Tribunes at this mess, just that they were not approached in time. Now that option has been taken. As for the best time to veto, well perhaps the Consuls should have stepped back and de-registered him when the issue was raised to prevent this. I suspect that everyone thought that as the 72 hours had passed and the Tribunes couldn't veto, it was a done deal and we could all proceed merrily along regardless. Modianus may yet get to parade around claiming to be Censor, but this process is still a right that can be exercised. Better that than dutifully sign my name to something I believe to be illegal.
 
The process of intercessio as laid down will take its course, and that is perfectly constitutional. 
 
Optime vale.

Sent: Sunday, June 07, 2009 3:15 PM
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Intercessio

Salvete omnes,

While I appreciate that Tribune Agrippa is acting according to his conscience here, I can not bring myself to accept a Tribune interposing his tribunician veto against the certified will of the electorate in *any* election held within Nova Roma.  It is especially inappropriate for a Tribune to attempt to interfere with the results of the Comitia Centuriata, but it would also be wrong if a Tribune attempted to veto the results of an election in the Comitia Plebis Tributa or the Comitia Populi Tributa.

I ask the other tribunes of the plebs to act decisively and overturn this intercessio.  Furthermore, I ask those senators and citizens who thought it was a good idea to seek our Tribune Agrippa's help to reconsider their reasoning, and withdraw their request to him.  The time to veto a candidate is before an election, not after one.  There was ample time during the contio for action, and the questions about Modianus' candidacy that were raised then were answered.  Seeking to prolong the division within our community by arguing the definition of the word "consecutive" does nothing to improve Nova Roma or the Pax Deorum.  Overturn this unfortunate intercessio and let's move forward.

Valete,

Gn. Equit. Marinus


--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, canadaoccidentalis@... wrote:
>
>
> Tribunus Plebis Gaius
Vipsanius Agrippa SPD
>
> I pronounce intercessio against the
custodes Marcus Lucretius Agricola and Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus in certifying the election of Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus as censor and against the consuls Marcus Iulius Severus and Marcus Cornelius Complutensis in accepting the election results. 




------------------------------------

Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo..com/group/Nova-Roma/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    mailto:Nova-Roma-digest@yahoogroups.com
    mailto:Nova-Roma-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66453 From: C. Maria Caeca Date: 2009-06-07
Subject: Re: thank you!
Yes, I now know that, and have expressed my gratitude to him privately, and
now publicly. Thank you.
C. Maria Caeca
----- Original Message -----
From: "Q. Valerius Poplicola" <q.valerius.poplicola@...>
To: <Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Sunday, June 07, 2009 5:44 PM
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: thank you!


> That would be M. Agricola who did that for you.
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "C. Maria Caeca" <shoshanahathaway@...>
> wrote:
>>
>> Salvete omnes,
>>
>> It seems that I owe a debt of gratitude to someone, but I don't know who.
>> So, to someone very kind, thank you for finishing the job of uploading my
>> photo to the Album Civium! I do apologize for messing up the job,
>> though.
>>
>> C. Maria Caeca
>>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 8.5.339 / Virus Database: 270.12.55/2160 - Release Date: 06/07/09
05:53:00
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66454 From: C. Maria Caeca Date: 2009-06-07
Subject: a little something ...
Since, if I understand the calendar post, the Vestalia begins about now, I
would like to take the liberty of posting this.

Respectfully,
C. Maria Caeca

Hymn to Vesta



At the center of my home:

At the center of my hearth:

At the center of my heart .

Your immaculate flame burns, white hot

Pure, bright, eternal;

Lighting my heartspace;

Guarding my hearthspace;

Warming my homespace.



Vesta, Mistress of virtue,

Guide my willing hands

That I might make of my home

A fit sanctuary in which to honor you.



Mighty Vesta, you who

Guard and bless the home,

Let the brilliant heat

Of your eternal flame keep safe my hearth

That nothing may invade, infect or despoil

My dwelling, from without or within.



Loving Vesta, gentle keeper of trusts and secrets

Fill my heart with your life giving, ever vigilant fire

That I may,

By my thoughts words, and deeds

Reflect, however dimly, Your great glory

For You are beacon and lodestone,

Guiding my steps and drawing me back to my center

You, Vesta, are my joy, my security, my inspiration .

And I, who adore You

Entreat Your blessing.





--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66455 From: Q. Caecilius Metellus Date: 2009-06-07
Subject: Re: Intercessio
Q Caecilius Metellus Quiritibus salutem plurimam dicit.

Saluete, Quirites.

Tribune Vipsanius Agrippa has, in accordance with his rights, abilities, and
duties, pronounced intercessio against the results of the recent vote of the
Comitia Centuriata. There are some -- T. Sabinus and Cn. Marinus, among others
-- who have called for his colleagues to stand against his intercessio. There
are others who would wish his colleagues to stand with his intercessio. For my
own part, I shall not be airing in this Forum my opinion on the candidacy of K.
Buteo Modianus, nor on the intercessio of Agrippa. My opinion is not pertinent
to the issue at hand.

The question at hand, presently, is whether it is permissible for a tribune to
pronounce intercessio against the results of an election. Again, that is not a
question for me to answer. The crux of the matter is the question of what it is
for which we have elected the tribunes to do. In my humble opinion, I argue
that we have elected them to act in, as their conscience and interpretation of
the law dictates, the interests of Nova Roma and to use the abilities of their
office to that end.

All that said, for as much as I find the voice of the People a factor of supreme
importance, it serves no purpose for us to inundate the Tribunes with our
interpretations of the law, as it rests with their interpretations, and, of
equal importance, their consciences. Therefore, I ask my plebeian brethren to
do one thing, and one thing alone with respect to the intercessio pronounced by
C. Vipsanius: act as your conscience, and your interpretation of the appropriate
laws, dictate.

Di nos Romanos incolumes custodiant.

Quintus Caecilius Metellus Postumianus
Aedilis Plebis
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66456 From: QFabiusMaxmi@aol.com Date: 2009-06-07
Subject: Re: Intercessio
In a message dated 6/7/2009 1:19:09 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time, aerdensrw@... writes:
We should not attempt to correct poorly-written legislation by overturning an election by the people. The people made their choice known; that choice should be allowed to stand.

The Comitia Centuriata election was supposed to settle this matter. If the election did not settle the matter, I begin to question why we have elections in Nova Roma, if their clear results can be endlessly disputed. Can the people's voice be so easily made irrelevant by those who disagree with the majority?

Trying to correct a law by backtracking after the people have already spoken is bad form, and it is more harmful to us than simply working with the results and forging ahead productively would be.

I ask the remaining tribuns to oppose this intercession.
 
Sorry.  That doesn't fly.  If indeed the People had made an intelligent decision that's one thing, but from what I can tell, the important I-XVIII centuries were occupied by the government's friends, who had no wish to see Cato in the Censorship.  Hence, they voted in direct opposition to rule, using the famous "vague and uncertain" language to justify their choice. 
 
Except there is no "vague and uncertain" language involved here as we had the rule's author still alive, still with us, and telling us exactly what his intentions were!  That is to keep the Same magistrate from carrying out two consecutive Censor Terms.  There was no break!  Censor Laenus did not complete 24 months as the Constitution stipulates.  He completed 4 1/2.  
This was not a case a long dead law writer's whose intentions were uncertain, and subject to interpretation.
 
But let's assume he is dead.  A term in Roman government and as defined in our Constitution as a  annual thing.  Censors get a double annual term.  Plain and simple.
 
It would appear the government is trying to hoodwink the people, by saying "You wanted this!"
 
A Strong Tribunate was constituted by Flavius Vedius to make sure that magistrates did not abuse the Constitution and bring the NR People to harm.  It is now up to them to do their jobs.
 
Q. Fabius Maximus      
 
Now, had indeed the Centuries been balanced       
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66457 From: Titus Iulius Sabinus Date: 2009-06-07
Subject: Re: Intercessio
T. Iulius Sabinus Cn. Iulio Caesari SPD

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Gnaeus Iulius Caesar" <gn_iulius_caesar@...> wrote:

> One of the purposes of the Tribunate in Nova Roma is to be a watchdog for the Constitution and the law. They are in many cases the final arbiters of issues pertaining to what is constitutional or unconstitutional, illegal or illegal. In Nova Roma the supreme legal authority is the Constitution. The people can vote to change it, through the approved process, but until they do it stands, or should do, over everything and everyone. It isn't Roman, and we all know that, but this is what we have.>>>

Under the law (Didia Gemina) tribunes serve the interests of the Plebs and citizens of Nova Roma, too.
The Plebs and citizens of Nova Roma voted. Through the vote the majority of Plebs and citizens of Nova Roma showed which their interest is. Their interest is in the current elected person. That is the decision of the majority.
Acting against the majority interest, the tribunes don't serve the interest of the Plebs and citizens of Nova Roma but a few. A few is not similar with majority. Serving a few against the majority transforms the tribunes in partisans and they are not in the best position in front of those who trusted them.

Caesar, there always will be "Senatus Populusque Romanus" and not "Senatus Paucique Romanus".

> As to my example - the offender analogy was meant to draw attention to the principle that those charged with oversight and enforcement often have a job to do that many may disagree with>>>

The example was not good. You portrayed from the beginning the person used in example as offender for sure. That I don't understand. Why all the time do you think that people wants to broke windows?

>but that is why we have tribunes, to police the constitution. In our system it doesn't matter if 1 of 10 or 100 or even 1000 people disagree with them, that is their job. Sometimes we all wish they had made different decisions, but that doesn't invalidate their right to make them, nor your right to feel as you do, or mine to feel as I do.>>>

There are laws which complete the Constitution: Fabia centuriata and Didia Gemina.

VALE ET VALETE,
T. Iulius Sabinus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66458 From: Q. Valerius Poplicola Date: 2009-06-07
Subject: Re: Intercessio
Thank you for this good post, amice Metelle. When the tribunes vetoed Censor Ti. Paulinus' appointments, they were applauded by the same people who now decry their actions. Yet nevertheless, we all accepted their votes as final.

I say let the tribunes have their peace. We can offer them our interpretation (as Marinus did), but they have the right to decide these things.

Poplicola, Quaestor and Flamen Falacer

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Q. Caecilius Metellus" <q.caecilius.metellus@...> wrote:
>
> Q Caecilius Metellus Quiritibus salutem plurimam dicit.
>
> Saluete, Quirites.
>
> Tribune Vipsanius Agrippa has, in accordance with his rights, abilities, and
> duties, pronounced intercessio against the results of the recent vote of the
> Comitia Centuriata. There are some -- T. Sabinus and Cn. Marinus, among others
> -- who have called for his colleagues to stand against his intercessio. There
> are others who would wish his colleagues to stand with his intercessio. For my
> own part, I shall not be airing in this Forum my opinion on the candidacy of K.
> Buteo Modianus, nor on the intercessio of Agrippa. My opinion is not pertinent
> to the issue at hand.
>
> The question at hand, presently, is whether it is permissible for a tribune to
> pronounce intercessio against the results of an election. Again, that is not a
> question for me to answer. The crux of the matter is the question of what it is
> for which we have elected the tribunes to do. In my humble opinion, I argue
> that we have elected them to act in, as their conscience and interpretation of
> the law dictates, the interests of Nova Roma and to use the abilities of their
> office to that end.
>
> All that said, for as much as I find the voice of the People a factor of supreme
> importance, it serves no purpose for us to inundate the Tribunes with our
> interpretations of the law, as it rests with their interpretations, and, of
> equal importance, their consciences. Therefore, I ask my plebeian brethren to
> do one thing, and one thing alone with respect to the intercessio pronounced by
> C. Vipsanius: act as your conscience, and your interpretation of the appropriate
> laws, dictate.
>
> Di nos Romanos incolumes custodiant.
>
> Quintus Caecilius Metellus Postumianus
> Aedilis Plebis
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66459 From: Gnaeus Iulius Caesar Date: 2009-06-07
Subject: Re: Intercessio
Cn. Iulius Caesar T. Iulio Sabino SPD
 
In Nova Roma the constitution is the ultimate authority unless it delegates that - which it doesn't regarding the power of intercessio - to a lex to define. The Tribunes are the watchdogs of the Constitution.
 
Why do I think all the time some people in Nova Roma want to break windows? Because some people over the last few years have used their positions to do just that, frequently. When the examples of constitutional window breaking stop I will stop thinking that. Starve me of examples of such window breaking by stopping breaking the windows.
 
The laws do not complete the Constitution. The Constitution stands alone and supreme in Nova Roma, unless the Constitution says otherwise.
 
Optime vale

Sent: Sunday, June 07, 2009 5:25 PM
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Intercessio

T. Iulius Sabinus Cn. Iulio Caesari SPD

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Gnaeus Iulius Caesar" <gn_iulius_caesar@...> wrote:

> One of the
purposes of the Tribunate in Nova Roma is to be a watchdog for the Constitution and the law. They are in many cases the final arbiters of issues pertaining to what is constitutional or unconstitutional, illegal or illegal. In Nova Roma the supreme legal authority is the Constitution. The people can vote to change it, through the approved process, but until they do it stands, or should do, over everything and everyone. It isn't Roman, and we all know that, but this is what we have.>>>

Under the law (Didia Gemina) tribunes serve the interests of the Plebs and citizens of Nova Roma, too.
The Plebs and citizens of Nova Roma voted. Through the vote the majority of Plebs and citizens of Nova Roma showed which their interest is. Their interest is in the current elected person. That is the
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66460 From: Titus Iulius Sabinus Date: 2009-06-07
Subject: Re: Intercessio
T. Iulius Sabinus Cn. Iulio Caesaris SPD

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Gnaeus Iulius Caesar" <gn_iulius_caesar@...> wrote:

> In Nova Roma the constitution is the ultimate authority unless it delegates that - which it doesn't regarding the power of intercessio - to a lex to define. The Tribunes are the watchdogs of the Constitution.>>>

Following this course: Labiena de intercessione, mod. by Didia Gemina, mod. by Arminia Equitia.

> Why do I think all the time some people in Nova Roma want to break windows? Because some people over the last few years have used their positions to do just that, frequently.>>>

It was not frequently but you as aedilis done one, too. You know which is but let's don't bring again the subject in forum. I prefer to wait the questores report.

>When the examples of constitutional window breaking stop I will stop thinking that. Starve me of examples of such window breaking by stopping breaking the windows.>>>

I can't starve you with something significant. I had an occasion but I voted in your favor of that item. I regret that. It was a good occasion to starve you now.
I think you will not stop thinking that. Your future consular year will prove that because one can not be Iulius Caesar and his own Brutus in the same time.

> The laws do not complete the Constitution. The Constitution stands alone and supreme in Nova Roma, unless the Constitution says otherwise.>>>

Sure, we wrote them, we voted them as Agricola, I and other to practice uploading texts on the wiki. Free practice on free support, thanks for opportunity!

VALE ET VALETE,
T. Iulius Sabinus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66461 From: Gnaeus Iulius Caesar Date: 2009-06-07
Subject: Re: Intercessio
Cn. Iulius Caesar T. Iulio Sabino SPD
 
The Constitution has a power of intercessio. The leges you quote does not detract from that all encompassing right. Were there to be a conflict section I.B of the Constitution decides it in favour of the Constitution and its definition.
 
As to the rest - your example isn't valid as there was no provision of the Constitution, lex or Senatus Consultum that prevented it. The current issue is considerably different. As to you regretting what you voted for or didn't, well that's up to you Sabine. One would hope you'd vote on the issue, but if you prefer other motivators - so be it.
 
Optime vale

Sent: Sunday, June 07, 2009 6:35 PM
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Intercessio

T. Iulius Sabinus Cn. Iulio Caesaris SPD

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Gnaeus Iulius Caesar" <gn_iulius_caesar@...> wrote:

> In Nova Roma the
constitution is the ultimate authority unless it delegates that - which it doesn't regarding the power of intercessio - to a lex to define. The Tribunes are the watchdogs of the Constitution.>>>

Following this course: Labiena de intercessione, mod. by Didia Gemina, mod. by Arminia Equitia.

>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66462 From: Maior Date: 2009-06-07
Subject: Re: Intercessio
M. Hortensia Quriribus spd;
Eheu
if anyone needed Mens Bona it is for this. If you comb through Livy or any history of Rome, you will never find an election vetoed by the tribunes of the plebs, for the very reason that the tribunes protected the rights of the people and an election is the ultimate voice of the people.

Vox Populi; Vox Dei.
Not Vox Gn. Iulius Caesar and his friends. and their tyranny

The time for legal objection - the contio passed; the election has occured the people elected the censor of their choice. Tribunes cannot veto elections it is not within their power. Agrippa's action has simply no meaning whatsoever.

optime vale
M. Hortensia Maior

PS; don't tell me about 'obeying the law' ie the Constituion. In Rome and Nova Roma the People are the ultimate authority. Your contempt for the People is quite obvious.

-- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Titus Iulius Sabinus" <iulius_sabinus@...> wrote:
>
> T. Iulius Sabinus Cn. Iulio Caesaris SPD
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Gnaeus Iulius Caesar" <gn_iulius_caesar@> wrote:
>
> > In Nova Roma the constitution is the ultimate authority unless it delegates that - which it doesn't regarding the power of intercessio - to a lex to define. The Tribunes are the watchdogs of the Constitution.>>>
>
> Following this course: Labiena de intercessione, mod. by Didia Gemina, mod. by Arminia Equitia.
>
> > Why do I think all the time some people in Nova Roma want to break windows? Because some people over the last few years have used their positions to do just that, frequently.>>>
>
> It was not frequently but you as aedilis done one, too. You know which is but let's don't bring again the subject in forum. I prefer to wait the questores report.
>
> >When the examples of constitutional window breaking stop I will stop thinking that. Starve me of examples of such window breaking by stopping breaking the windows.>>>
>
> I can't starve you with something significant. I had an occasion but I voted in your favor of that item. I regret that. It was a good occasion to starve you now.
> I think you will not stop thinking that. Your future consular year will prove that because one can not be Iulius Caesar and his own Brutus in the same time.
>
> > The laws do not complete the Constitution. The Constitution stands alone and supreme in Nova Roma, unless the Constitution says otherwise.>>>
>
> Sure, we wrote them, we voted them as Agricola, I and other to practice uploading texts on the wiki. Free practice on free support, thanks for opportunity!
>
> VALE ET VALETE,
> T. Iulius Sabinus
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66463 From: Q. Valerius Poplicola Date: 2009-06-07
Subject: Re: Intercessio
Ancient Rome also was not a 401c3 non-profit organization. Disband the NPO status, and do as you please.

> PS; don't tell me about 'obeying the law' ie the Constituion. In Rome and Nova Roma the People are the ultimate authority. Your contempt for the People is quite obvious.

No wonder no law firm would hire you.

Cheers.

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Maior" <rory12001@...> wrote:
>
> M. Hortensia Quriribus spd;
> Eheu
> if anyone needed Mens Bona it is for this. If you comb through Livy or any history of Rome, you will never find an election vetoed by the tribunes of the plebs, for the very reason that the tribunes protected the rights of the people and an election is the ultimate voice of the people.
>
> Vox Populi; Vox Dei.
> Not Vox Gn. Iulius Caesar and his friends. and their tyranny
>
> The time for legal objection - the contio passed; the election has occured the people elected the censor of their choice. Tribunes cannot veto elections it is not within their power. Agrippa's action has simply no meaning whatsoever.
>
> optime vale
> M. Hortensia Maior
>
> PS; don't tell me about 'obeying the law' ie the Constituion. In Rome and Nova Roma the People are the ultimate authority. Your contempt for the People is quite obvious.
>
> -- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Titus Iulius Sabinus" <iulius_sabinus@> wrote:
> >
> > T. Iulius Sabinus Cn. Iulio Caesaris SPD
> >
> > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Gnaeus Iulius Caesar" <gn_iulius_caesar@> wrote:
> >
> > > In Nova Roma the constitution is the ultimate authority unless it delegates that - which it doesn't regarding the power of intercessio - to a lex to define. The Tribunes are the watchdogs of the Constitution.>>>
> >
> > Following this course: Labiena de intercessione, mod. by Didia Gemina, mod. by Arminia Equitia.
> >
> > > Why do I think all the time some people in Nova Roma want to break windows? Because some people over the last few years have used their positions to do just that, frequently.>>>
> >
> > It was not frequently but you as aedilis done one, too. You know which is but let's don't bring again the subject in forum. I prefer to wait the questores report.
> >
> > >When the examples of constitutional window breaking stop I will stop thinking that. Starve me of examples of such window breaking by stopping breaking the windows.>>>
> >
> > I can't starve you with something significant. I had an occasion but I voted in your favor of that item. I regret that. It was a good occasion to starve you now.
> > I think you will not stop thinking that. Your future consular year will prove that because one can not be Iulius Caesar and his own Brutus in the same time.
> >
> > > The laws do not complete the Constitution. The Constitution stands alone and supreme in Nova Roma, unless the Constitution says otherwise.>>>
> >
> > Sure, we wrote them, we voted them as Agricola, I and other to practice uploading texts on the wiki. Free practice on free support, thanks for opportunity!
> >
> > VALE ET VALETE,
> > T. Iulius Sabinus
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66464 From: Robert Levee Date: 2009-06-07
Subject: Intercessio!
Tribunis Plebis Ap.Galerius Aurelianus SPD

I the case of the intercessio ,against the outcome of the recent election and those who lift their voices in it's support ,are in my opinion laboring under a false premise.

Simply stated, is the fact that any such intercessio ,should have been raised during the contio,in that alloted time before the election took place,as stated in the Lex Fabia de ratione Comitiorum Centuriatorum (Nova Roma).So it is also my opinion that said action has no basis in the Lex(Nova Roma).

Vale et valete,
Ap.Galerius Aurelianus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66465 From: M. Lucretius Agricola Date: 2009-06-07
Subject: Re: Intercessio
--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Q. Valerius Poplicola" <q.valerius.poplicola@...> wrote:
>

>
> No wonder no law firm would hire you.
>


Typical of the distorted, untruthful, ad hominem bullying that we have come to expect from you.

MLA
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66466 From: M•IVL• SEVERVS Date: 2009-06-07
Subject: ELECTIONS, INTERCESSIO AND THE WILL OF THE PEOPLE
Salvete Quirites, People of Nova Roma!
 
Comitia results cannot be vetoed; only during the contio can items up for a vote be vetoed.  What the Tribunus Plebis G. Vipsanius Agrippa is trying to do has no legal basis and is not valid. K. Fabius Buteo Modianus was legally elected by you, the People, as Censor suffectus of Nova Roma.

The intercessio attempt by Tribunus Agrippa makes reference to things that did not happen. The procedures followed by Custodes M. Lucretius Agricola and Cn Cornelius Lentulus, followed the laws even in the most minor points. It cannot be shown that they left out something that they were required to do, or that they did things that were not permitted for them to do.

Additionally, there is no provision in the law for Custodes, (or Diribitores) to do other than what was done, or to exercise judgment in what is a good or bad thing to vote on. The legal duty of the Custodes is to watch and to break ties. The legal duty of the Diribitores is to count votes according to the law and to report results. Exercise of other powers is outside their legal duties.

Your will, People of Nova Roma, cannot be twisted or disrespected by any magistrate or citizen.

As for the attacks ad hominem from the same pathetic characters that are trying to destroy our Res publica, I will not respond. They desperately need to find anything to feed their egos and ambitions. I won’t contribute.
 
Valete,
M•IVL•SEVERVS
CONSVL•NOVÆ•ROMÆ

SENATOR
CONSVL•PROVINCIÆ•MEXICI
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66467 From: M•IVL• SEVERVS Date: 2009-06-07
Subject: ELECCIONES, INTERCESSIO Y LA VOLUNTAD DEL PUEBLO
Salvete Quirites, Pueblo de Nova Roma:
 
Los resultados de las votaciones en los Comitia no pueden ser vetados. Únicamente durante el contio, es posible que los temas sometidos a votación reciban algún veto autorizado. Lo que intenta hacer el Tribuno de la Plebe G. Vipsanius Agrippa, carece de fundamento legal y de validez. K. Fabius Buteo Modianus fue legalmente electo por ustedes, el Pueblo, como Censor suffectus de Nova Roma.

El intento de intercessio del Tribuno Agrippa se refiere a hechos que no ocurrieron. Los procedimientos seguidos por los Custodes M. Lucretius Agricola y Cn. Cornelius Lentulus, se apegaron a la ley incluso en los aspectos menos relevantes. Nadie puede demostrar que dejaron de hacer algo a lo que estuvieran legalmente obligados, o que tomaran decisiones más allá de sus facultades legales.

Adicionalmente, no existe disposición legal alguna para que los Custodes o los Diribitores hagan algo más de lo que hicieron en las pasadas elecciones en los Comitia Centuriata, o para que juzguen sobre la viabilidad de los temas sujetos a votación. La obligación legal de los Custodes es supervisar el proceso electoral y resolver los empates. La obligación legal de los Diribitores es contar los votos conforme a la ley, e informar de los resultados.

El ejercicio de cualesquier otros poderes o atribuciones, cae fuera de sus facultades legales.

La voluntad de ustedes, Quirites, Pueblo de Nova Roma, no puede ser torcida o violada por ningún magistrado o ciudadano.

En cuanto a los ataques ad hominem provenientes de los mismos personajes patéticos que tratan de destruís a nuestra Res publica, no tengo respuesta alguna. Pretenden desesperadamente encontrar alimento, el que sea, para sus egos y ambiciones. No pienso contribuir.
 
Valete,
M•IVL•SEVERVS
CONSVL•NOVÆ•ROMÆ

SENATOR
CONSVL•PROVINCIÆ•MEXICI
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66468 From: aerdensrw Date: 2009-06-07
Subject: Re: a little something ...
P. Corva Gaudialis C. Mariae Caecae s.p.d.

That is a _beautiful_ prayer! Would you mind if I share it with my coven?

Vale in pace Deorum

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "C. Maria Caeca" <shoshanahathaway@...> wrote:
>
> Since, if I understand the calendar post, the Vestalia begins about now, I
> would like to take the liberty of posting this.
>
> Respectfully,
> C. Maria Caeca
>
> Hymn to Vesta
>
>
>
> At the center of my home:
>
> At the center of my hearth:
>
> At the center of my heart .
>
> Your immaculate flame burns, white hot
>
> Pure, bright, eternal;
>
> Lighting my heartspace;
>
> Guarding my hearthspace;
>
> Warming my homespace.
>
>
>
> Vesta, Mistress of virtue,
>
> Guide my willing hands
>
> That I might make of my home
>
> A fit sanctuary in which to honor you.
>
>
>
> Mighty Vesta, you who
>
> Guard and bless the home,
>
> Let the brilliant heat
>
> Of your eternal flame keep safe my hearth
>
> That nothing may invade, infect or despoil
>
> My dwelling, from without or within.
>
>
>
> Loving Vesta, gentle keeper of trusts and secrets
>
> Fill my heart with your life giving, ever vigilant fire
>
> That I may,
>
> By my thoughts words, and deeds
>
> Reflect, however dimly, Your great glory
>
> For You are beacon and lodestone,
>
> Guiding my steps and drawing me back to my center
>
> You, Vesta, are my joy, my security, my inspiration .
>
> And I, who adore You
>
> Entreat Your blessing.
>
>
>
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66469 From: Q. Valerius Poplicola Date: 2009-06-07
Subject: Re: Intercessio
And as usual, you have nothing to say.

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "M. Lucretius Agricola" <marcus.lucretius@...> wrote:
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Q. Valerius Poplicola" <q.valerius.poplicola@> wrote:
> >
>
> >
> > No wonder no law firm would hire you.
> >
>
>
> Typical of the distorted, untruthful, ad hominem bullying that we have come to expect from you.
>
> MLA
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66470 From: Maior Date: 2009-06-07
Subject: Re: Apollonius of Tyana
Salve Graece;
back with time for some thought. Yes, sorry about mixing up Ogden with Dickie. I'm quite interested in Pythagoreanism during the Republic so his material on Nigidius Figulus and a bit on Vatinus was quite interesting.
I'd say that Pythagoras and his followers who embodied kingship, philosophy, governance, in Croton were unique.
. In the Kinsgley he has a chapter 'The Magus' and discusses Empedocles and the Egyptian magical papyri. I leave that to you, as it is beyond my area of knowledge. And he does quite a good job on the outright denial by modern scholars when dealing with Pythagoras' and Empedocles' claims to magical powers.

Hmm, I know that the term 'Vidya' is used in Hinduism for knowledge, but I think that is esoteric knowledge, such as in the tantras. The root of vid - is 'know' but I've just a Sanskrit dictionary, Scholastica would know as she studied the language. I'd agree with you, in the Greek and Roman understanding, morality and religion were separate, morality belonged to philosophers, in India religion and morality are tied.
thanks for the correction of the Dickie title;-)
vale
Maior
>
> Salve Maior,
>
> I've not read Kingsley's book, but Ogden's book is decent, although, I'd say better as a compendium of references and interesting individual discussions than presenting a coherent overall theory and understanding of the nature of magic and necromancy.
>
> I wouldn't put so much emphasis on Plato "splitting mind and body"-- Radical monism wasn't common before Plato. And, as you may gather from Reimer's discussion, in late antiquity some could associate philosophy with power as well. Philostratus isn't the only example; you have Galen calling Jesus a philosopher (of course, the one mention of "philosophy" in the New Testament, Col 2:8, is not at all positive). Linking "philosophy" with religious views can happen in other ways too, such as in Asclepius 14, where to adore the godhead without "curious thinking" is pure philosophy.
>
> Those examples aside, I wonder whether whatever Sanskrit or other term Indian gurus have for "philosophy" really doesn't correspond to the Greek term. I have no knowledge of Sanskrit or other Indic languages, so someone else would have to step in at this point, but perhaps the problem is that "theologian" better fits whatever Indian terminology and that to invoke "philosophy/philosopher" is inappropriate?
>
> Vale,
>
> Gualterus
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Maior" <rory12001@> wrote:
> >
> > Salve Gualtere;
> > yes, I'd been leafing through Reimer at the library,and reading an essay in "Theios Sophistes" and thinking about Kingsley's excellent "Ancient Philosophy Mystery and Magic" D. Ogden's "Greek and Roman Necromancy." Pythagoreansim is an interest of mine.
> >
> > Those books are quite good on pythagoreans and neo-pythagoreans. Kingsley before he went new agey did a good job in dissecting them and the shamanic aspects of pythagoras and pythagoreanism. It didn't seem so different to me from that Indian ideal. Plato split mind and body and ever after the philosopher who had powers seems to have disappeared from the West. Not magic but that type...it's a matter of interest to me.
> > vale
> > Maior
> >
> > >
> > > Is this in reference to the discussion in chapter 2, pp 51-56, about Apollonius as philosopher?
> > >
> > > Vale,
> > >
> > > Gualterus
> > >
> > > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Maior" <rory12001@> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > M. Hortensia quiritibus spd;
> > > > I remember Graecus Agicola and I having a little discussion about this eminent man.
> > > > When I looked in the book he mentioned which was about magicians, I was thinking that this is a typical prejudice nowdays in the West, that wise men philosophers don't and should not have any kind of powers. But of course in India one finds godmen and godwomen, heroes possessing powers all the time. Some are indeed charlatans and some authentic.
> > > >
> > > > In ancient Rome, we'd fine the same spread...
> > > > Maior
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66471 From: deciusiunius Date: 2009-06-08
Subject: Re: Intercessio
--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Gnaeus Iulius Caesar" <gn_iulius_caesar@...> wrote:
>
> Cn. Iulius Caesar T. Iulio Sabino SPD

Salve amice,
>
> If you believe both opinions are valid, not a view I share, but as >you advance that position, then Tribune Agrippa is entitled to his >view as well, isn't he? Palladius I think said his intention was to >prevent a candidacy like this but he could see how the law could be >interpreted to mean what the adherents of Modianus said it meant.

Yes, that is exactly what I said. There is enough ambiguity in the law to allow both interpretations, though your analysis linking term of office to the section defining censor in the Constitution is a strong one.

Even though I believe this to be the correct interpretation, I also believe the time to challenge Constitutionally is past. There is blame enough to go around that can be laid in many places: primarily on the consules and rogatores for not doing due diligence in properly vetting candidates. Also blame can rest on Modianus for not withdrawing when the cloud covered his candidacy; on me for not speaking out earlier, you for not speaking our earlier; anyone else who suspected all was not right in this election but who didn't speak out earlier. But what is done is done and this has past Constitutional muster. Let this be a lesson to us all.

You have to ask yourself what good it does Nova Roma to seek intercessio at this point and continue to challenge this election. Do you feel that shaking? That is Nova Roma's foundation, already on damaged after last year's praetores (ironically enough this years consules) trampled over the law during Cincinnatus' trial. Now it is trembling even more.

I often wonder what it is about this place that makes generally normal, nice, reasonable people into raving lunatics foaming at the mouth when our petty politics comes to the fore (I'm not calling you a lunatic but you know what I mean). Octavius is right, all factions are insane in Nova Roma, though not the people in them taken as individuals. Maybe he proved today he was the only sane person among us. I don't know, all I know is that challenging this election does no one any good, least of all Nova Roma. I for one don't let my politics or disagreements dictate my friendships, so I offer this commentary for what it's worth. I know you are doing this because you believe it is the right thing to do, and you Sulla as well. I don't question that, but I do question its wisdom.

Vale,

Palladius






None the less his intention was to prevent it and one Tribune has acted according to his constitutional right. The system is working exactly how it was meant to work.
>
> To talk of him having his reputation destroyed because as Tribune he exercised that right is a little excessive. Its rather similar to a man whose friends encourage him to break the window in a jewelry store and run off with a necklace. He breaks the window and runs off with it. The alarm on the shop sounds. Pedestrians shout "Police!" The police arrive and arrest the robber. Then a friend of the robber steps forward and tells the police that they have no honour because they arrested him, as all his friends and associates and people standing nearby said it was ok to break the window. No, it wasn't ok. Public approbation for law breaking doesn't validate the act. An illegal act is an illegal act.
>
> Sometimes Tribunes agree with requests for intercessio, sometimes they don't. If the intercessio stands, look not to blame the Tribunes or the people that called for the intercessio, which is our right to do so, but blame the decision making process that allowed this candidacy in the first place.
>
> Optime vale.
>
>
> From: Titus Iulius Sabinus
> Sent: Sunday, June 07, 2009 10:56 AM
> To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Intercessio
>
>
> SALVE AGRIPPA!
>
> Frankly, I can not understand how you, a man with honor, was able to accept to destroy your reputation and to subordinate yourself acting this way!
> Opinions were divided. Palladius who wrote the law confirmed that both opinions are valid. Voting, people decided.
> Unbelievable! What a shame!
>
> VALE,
> T. Iulius Sabinus
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66472 From: Gnaeus Iulius Caesar Date: 2009-06-08
Subject: Re: Intercessio
Salve amice.
 
It really is very simple from my perspective. We go to the trouble of enacting laws and having a constitution that we all swear allegiance to. Then we reach a cross roads like this, You are correct about my point on the definition and indeed no one can counter it. So what is being implicitly said is "its too later". I disagree, for it is never too late to prevent an abuse of the law, or should never be. Our laws and Constitution do not allow a law to be disregarded just because magistrates put a bag on their heads and refused to consider alternatives and refused to take the prudent course of action and de-register him. If we simply say "ooops - oh well done deal" then our laws mean nothing, or even less than they do even now and all we are doing is rubber stamping the right to trample over the inconvenient ones and use the ones that benefit us, depending on the influence you have. That doesn't create a community where anyone can have any faith in anything in a law, or the Constitution, because someone will find a way to circumvent them and as we saw last year that now translates into vindictive prosecutions.  
 
From my perspective the good it does is to point out that the law means something. Maybe if we had all been alert to what was being enacted under our noses prior to the trials last year, a carefully planned exercise obviously from the passing of the Senatus Consulta to the passing of the sentence, Cincinnatus would still be among us. I am not convinced that we should quietly fold our tents and shrug and chalk up yet another exercise in illegality. All the fatuous claims that a vote in comitia nullify a law are of course legal hog wash and just cooked up to try to nullify the intercessio.
 
I am quite sure at the end of the day they will all get their way, somehow, and Modianus will end up illegally as Censor, and if they don't what is the worst case scenario? Is Nova Roma going to implode? Nope. Life will go on as always. We will have to differ on what is the right and wrong time, for the Constitution allows this and the intercessio doesn't invalidate the election process, just the winner. If Modianus wins then as you and I know the law loses. Do the people really win if the law is flouted and the Constitution trampled yet again? Even that is irrelevant, for in Nova Roma the paramount authority is the Constitution so we should still be in the business of protecting that, for without that and no other constraints, then all that will matter is who has the biggest hat of power on, for they will be able to do whatever they want whenever they want to whoever they want. That is a singularly unappealing idea of a community.
 
As I said, I am sure they will manage to wheedle their way around the law and Constitution again so I wouldn't be that concerned.
 
Trust to their ability to bend, twist and break everything. I do.
 
Vale bene
Caesar
 
Sent: Sunday, June 07, 2009 10:30 PM
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Intercessio

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Gnaeus Iulius Caesar" <gn_iulius_caesar@...> wrote:
>
> Cn. Iulius
Caesar T. Iulio Sabino SPD

Salve amice,
>
> If you believe
both opinions are valid, not a view I share, but as >you advance that position, then Tribune Agrippa is entitled to his >view as well, isn't he? Palladius I think said his intention was to >prevent a candidacy like this but he could see how the law could be >interpreted to mean what the adherents of Modianus said it meant.

Yes, that is exactly what I said. There is enough ambiguity in the law to allow both interpretations, though your analysis linking term of office to the section defining censor in the Constitution is a strong one.

Even though I believe this to be the correct interpretation, I also believe the time to challenge Constitutionally is past. There is blame enough to go around that can be laid in many places: primarily on the consules and rogatores for not doing due diligence in properly vetting candidates. Also blame can rest on Modianus for not withdrawing when the cloud covered his candidacy; on me for not speaking out earlier, you for not speaking our earlier; anyone else who suspected all was not right in this election but who didn't speak out earlier. But what is done is done and this has past Constitutional muster. Let this be a lesson to us all.

You have to ask yourself what good it does Nova Roma to seek intercessio at this point and continue to challenge this election. Do you feel that shaking? That is Nova Roma's foundation, already on damaged after last year's praetores (ironically enough this years consules) trampled over the law during Cincinnatus' trial. Now it is trembling even more.

I often wonder what it is about this place that makes generally normal, nice, reasonable people into raving lunatics foaming at the mouth when our petty politics comes to the fore (I'm not calling you a lunatic but you know what I mean). Octavius is right, all factions are insane in Nova Roma, though not the people in them taken as individuals. Maybe he proved today he was the only sane person among us. I don't know, all I know is that challenging this election does no one any good, least of all Nova Roma. I for one don't let my politics or disagreements dictate my friendships, so I offer this commentary for what it's worth. I know you are doing this because you believe it is the right thing to do, and you Sulla as well. I don't question that, but I do question its wisdom.

Vale,

Palladius




 

None the less his intention was to prevent it and one Tribune has acted according to his constitutional right. The system is working exactly how it was meant to work.
>
>
To talk of him having his reputation destroyed because as Tribune he exercised that right is a little excessive. Its rather similar to a man whose friends encourage him to break the window in a jewelry store and run off with a necklace. He breaks the window and runs off with it. The alarm on the shop sounds. Pedestrians shout "Police!" The police arrive and arrest the robber. Then a friend of the robber steps forward and tells the police that they have no honour because they arrested him, as all his friends and associates and people standing nearby said it was ok to break the window. No, it wasn't ok. Public approbation for law breaking doesn't validate the act. An illegal act is an illegal act.
>
> Sometimes Tribunes agree with requests for
intercessio, sometimes they don't. If the intercessio stands, look not to blame the Tribunes or the people that called for the intercessio, which is our right to do so, but blame the decision making process that allowed this candidacy in the first place.
>
> Optime vale.
>
>
> From:
Titus Iulius Sabinus
> Sent: Sunday, June 07, 2009 10:56 AM
> To:
Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Intercessio
>
>
> SALVE
AGRIPPA!
>
> Frankly, I can not understand how you, a man with
honor, was able to accept to destroy your reputation and to subordinate yourself acting this way!
> Opinions were divided. Palladius who wrote the law
confirmed that both opinions are valid. Voting, people decided.
>
Unbelievable! What a shame!
>
> VALE,
> T. Iulius
Sabinus
>




------------------------------------

Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo..com/group/Nova-Roma/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    mailto:Nova-Roma-digest@yahoogroups.com
    mailto:Nova-Roma-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66473 From: Jennifer Harris Date: 2009-06-08
Subject: Re: kitten report?
This is the part where we all go "awwww"......


Glad to know that kittens are doing okay....


Vale,
Aeternia

On Sun, Jun 7, 2009 at 2:06 PM, Diana Octavia
Aventina<roman.babe@...> wrote:
>
>
> Salve Maxima Valeria,
>
> Thanks for the update!
> And a nice choice of names too.
>
>>Naturally, being babies still, they make a mess sliding the dishes all over
>>the place.
> I have always fed my kittens in paper plates so that the dish would not be
> too high for them, but then they stand right in the middle of the dish.
> Messy, but cute....
>
> Vale,
> Diana
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: <violetphearsen@...>
> To: <Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com>
> Sent: Sunday, June 07, 2009 5:40 PM
> Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] kitten report?
>
> The kittens are doing very well. I spoke with our friend who is caring for
> them and she reports the kittens have been weaned and are eating kitten food
> like it's going out of style. Naturally, being babies still, they make a
> mess sliding the dishes all over the place. I haven't been given any
> pictures yet, but they have been given their Roman names.
> The boy kittens have been named Caelius, Felix and Numa.
> The girl kittens have been named Diana, Palatina and Tullia.
> We've nicknamed them the Argei Micine.
> I'll ask our friend for pictures when I see her at our Vestalia ritual on
> Tuesday. I told her to bring the kittens so they can be present at the
> ritual and we can visit with them afterwards. Should make for a fun day. :)
>
> Vale bene in pace Deorum,
>
> Maxima Valeria Messallina
>
> --- On Sun, 5/31/09, C. Maria Caeca <shoshanahathaway@...> wrote:
>
> From: C. Maria Caeca <shoshanahathaway@...>
> Subject: [Nova-Roma] kitten report?
> To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> Date: Sunday, May 31, 2009, 3:05 PM
>
> Salve, Valeria Messalina, et salvete omnes,
>
> Speaking of the lighter side ... I haven't seen a kitten report in way too
> long! I trust they are thriving, treating their human "staff" with the
> appropriate high handedness, and ruling their environment with steel claws
> beneath velvet paws?
>
> Have their tiny majesties (all cats are, by their very nature, royalty, you
> know), deigned to allow themselves to be photographed? Do we have pictures?
> Are their personalities starting to develop? Report, *please?* :).
>
> C. Maria Caeca
>
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66474 From: Lucius Coruncanius Cato Date: 2009-06-08
Subject: Re: Intercessio
L. Coruncanius Cato omn. spd,

I am with you, Venator, in this statement. Time for vetoing the candidacy ended with the contio. Now it is time to move forward. This intercesio is not only unlawful, as it comes long past the 72h period, but a very dangerous movement, as it is a long step backwards and sets up a precedent for those who doesn't like the results of an election. One might not like the results, but trying to overturn them by veto is really antidemocratic, and those gestures are only seen in places where the voice of citizens or members means less than wet paper.

I also agree with the needing of rewriting some of the laws involved in this election, to make them pristine clear, with words stating what they intend to mean, and permitting no interpretation. I sent a proposal to the Law Review commitee on those leges, which has been ignored by most of those who complain about the meaning and interpretation of those laws.

This shows, to me, that these actions and wills from those persons are not for the better of NR, but an intent to bring down all what has been accomplished for the last 11 years. I know coexistence is hard sometimes, but we have to carry on with it. And Venator shows this spirit by not resigning when he does not like something, and by the will to be part of the solution, and not of the problem.

I too ask for the tribunes to block this intercessio, even when it is not legal and should not be placed, and I humbly ask you, tribune Agrippa, to think about what you are doing, why yo do it, and what are the effects.

Di vos incolumem custodiant.

--
L. Coruncanius Cato
Aedilis Curulis
Scriba Consulis Hispaniae

--- El dom, 7/6/09, Publius Ullerius Stephanus Venator <famila.ulleria.venii@...> escribió:

De: Publius Ullerius Stephanus Venator <famila.ulleria.venii@...>
Asunto: Re: [Nova-Roma] Intercessio
Para: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Fecha: domingo, 7 junio, 2009 7:11

Avete Omnes;

I ask the other tribunes, as a long time Cives Nova Roma, to help
things move along by opposing this Intercession.

I was a voice, albeit a fairly quiet one, in opposition to the
candidacy of Modianus for Censor.

I still believe the Law under which his candidacy was touted as legal
and opposed as illegal is poorly written and too open to
interpretation. Our Laws need clarity, brevity and simplicity. Law
must not only be for the lawyers, it must be primarily for the
understanding by and protection of the People.

We must needs not try and cover every situation; having macronational
law, statute and regulation, which supersedes what we do here.

However, the Vox Populi has been heard, and is that not the true
foundation of any Res Publica? If the People do not contest the
legitimacy of a Law, it stands.

The majority of the People, by their resounding silence, also lent
tacit approval to the candidacy of Modianus. This intercession is, in
my opinion, an ex post facto attempt at what should have been resolved
during the discussion before the Cista opened.

By the vote count and tally, Modianus has the confidence of a majority
of the members of the Centuries.

Yes, this note has an air of resignation about it; what's done is
done, que sera, sera.

There are problems, which need to be addressed, and I will try better
to be a part of the solution. I am not considering leaving, neither
the Senate, the Lictorship nor Nova Roma, though I will step back from
committee and scribal appointments to ponder things. (...and, yes, I
realize I'd already been a bit withdrawn in those arenas already.) I
need time to think.

To my friends herein, I know this is unexpected, but did you really
see something different coming, in light of my nature?

I have made no enemies in Nova Roma, though there are a few who I find
useless to the future of our endeavor. I shall no longer respond to
them, neither directly nor indirectly, neither here nor elsewhere.

In closing, I ask again that the other Tribunes block this
Intercession and be more proactive in the future.

============ ========= ========= ========= ==
In amicitia et fides -
Publius Ullerius Stephanus Venator
Civis circa Quintilis MMDCCLI a.u.c.
Senator et Lictor

Religio Septentrionalis - Poeta
------------ --------- --------- ---
May the Holy Powers smile on our efforts.
May the Spirits of our family lines nod in approval.
May we be of Worth to our fellow Nova Romans.


Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66475 From: Lucius Coruncanius Cato Date: 2009-06-08
Subject: Re: Intercessio
L. Coruncanius Cato Valerio Poplicolae SPD

Indeed! I was glad that the Tribunes placed a veto on an illegal senate appointment. And indeed I am sad that a tribune tries to place a veto on the results of an election.
These are two different things, and trying to link them like a partisan issue shows disrespect both to the people and to the tribunes.
Of course the tribunes have their own mind. It's implicit. Having to state this is disrespect.

Di vos incolumem custodiant.

--
L. Coruncanius Cato
Aedilis Curulis
Scriba Consulis Hispaniae

--- El lun, 8/6/09, Q. Valerius Poplicola <q.valerius.poplicola@...> escribió:

De: Q. Valerius Poplicola <q.valerius.poplicola@...>
Asunto: [Nova-Roma] Re: Intercessio
Para: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Fecha: lunes, 8 junio, 2009 1:00

Thank you for this good post, amice Metelle. When the tribunes vetoed Censor Ti. Paulinus' appointments, they were applauded by the same people who now decry their actions. Yet nevertheless, we all accepted their votes as final.

I say let the tribunes have their peace. We can offer them our interpretation (as Marinus did), but they have the right to decide these things.

Poplicola, Quaestor and Flamen Falacer

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com, "Q. Caecilius Metellus" <q.caecilius. metellus@ ...> wrote:
>
> Q Caecilius Metellus Quiritibus salutem plurimam dicit.
>
> Saluete, Quirites.
>
> Tribune Vipsanius Agrippa has, in accordance with his rights, abilities, and
> duties, pronounced intercessio against the results of the recent vote of the
> Comitia Centuriata. There are some -- T. Sabinus and Cn. Marinus, among others
> -- who have called for his colleagues to stand against his intercessio. There
> are others who would wish his colleagues to stand with his intercessio. For my
> own part, I shall not be airing in this Forum my opinion on the candidacy of K.
> Buteo Modianus, nor on the intercessio of Agrippa. My opinion is not pertinent
> to the issue at hand.
>
> The question at hand, presently, is whether it is permissible for a tribune to
> pronounce intercessio against the results of an election. Again, that is not a
> question for me to answer. The crux of the matter is the question of what it is
> for which we have elected the tribunes to do. In my humble opinion, I argue
> that we have elected them to act in, as their conscience and interpretation of
> the law dictates, the interests of Nova Roma and to use the abilities of their
> office to that end.
>
> All that said, for as much as I find the voice of the People a factor of supreme
> importance, it serves no purpose for us to inundate the Tribunes with our
> interpretations of the law, as it rests with their interpretations, and, of
> equal importance, their consciences. Therefore, I ask my plebeian brethren to
> do one thing, and one thing alone with respect to the intercessio pronounced by
> C. Vipsanius: act as your conscience, and your interpretation of the appropriate
> laws, dictate.
>
> Di nos Romanos incolumes custodiant.
>
> Quintus Caecilius Metellus Postumianus
> Aedilis Plebis
>


Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66476 From: QFabiusMaxmi@aol.com Date: 2009-06-08
Subject: Re: Intercessio
In a message dated 6/7/2009 9:31:54 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time, bcatfd@... writes:
You have to ask yourself what good it does Nova Roma to seek intercessio at this point and continue to challenge this election. Do you feel that shaking? That is Nova Roma's foundation, already on damaged after last year's praetores (ironically enough this years consules) trampled over the law during Cincinnatus' trial. Now it is trembling even more.
Did we not have this discussion at Roman Days many years before?
 
Why have laws or rules if they will not be followed?  Why was Rome's greatest strength her laws?
 
Because they were obeyed by all.  As Cornelius said.  The law is the last shield before chaos.
 
Q. Fabius Maximus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66477 From: Lucius Coruncanius Cato Date: 2009-06-08
Subject: Re: Intercessio
L. Coruncanius Cato Fabio Maximo SPD

Of course! Now the issue is that "the important centuries were occupied by government friends". Sorry sir, but this is NOT the issue here.
The issue is you do not accept the results of an election. The issue is you ignored a proposal on the Law Review Comitee to rewrite this vague and open to interpretation law, stating that "the writer of the law was to mean that" ...

The writter of the law wrote the law. Thank him. Laws are written to avoid personal interpretations. This law permits a really huge interpretation on any side you want, so it is badly written, so we need to state CLEARLY what every word means, instead of "what intends to mean on behalf of the law writer".

The simplest way to mean "4" is to say "4/four", not "you take 2, add it 6 and then take 4, divide the result by 2 and add the result 2". Or in a rude way: the simplest way to say "shit" is to say "shit". Even if it is bullshit, cowshit or horseshit and divage about the properties and benefits of any of them. It is shit indeed.


Di vos incolumem custodiant.

--
L. Coruncanius Cato
Aedilis Curulis
Scriba Consulis Hispaniae

--- El lun, 8/6/09, QFabiusMaxmi@... <QFabiusMaxmi@...> escribió:

De: QFabiusMaxmi@... <QFabiusMaxmi@...>
Asunto: Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: Intercessio
Para: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Fecha: lunes, 8 junio, 2009 1:21

In a message dated 6/7/2009 1:19:09 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time, aerdensrw@yahoo. com writes:
We should not attempt to correct poorly-written legislation by overturning an election by the people. The people made their choice known; that choice should be allowed to stand.

The Comitia Centuriata election was supposed to settle this matter. If the election did not settle the matter, I begin to question why we have elections in Nova Roma, if their clear results can be endlessly disputed. Can the people's voice be so easily made irrelevant by those who disagree with the majority?

Trying to correct a law by backtracking after the people have already spoken is bad form, and it is more harmful to us than simply working with the results and forging ahead productively would be.

I ask the remaining tribuns to oppose this intercession.
 
Sorry.  That doesn't fly.  If indeed the People had made an intelligent decision that's one thing, but from what I can tell, the important I-XVIII centuries were occupied by the government's friends, who had no wish to see Cato in the Censorship.  Hence, they voted in direct opposition to rule, using the famous "vague and uncertain" language to justify their choice. 
 
Except there is no "vague and uncertain" language involved here as we had the rule's author still alive, still with us, and telling us exactly what his intentions were!  That is to keep the Same magistrate from carrying out two consecutive Censor Terms.  There was no break!  Censor Laenus did not complete 24 months as the Constitution stipulates.  He completed 4 1/2.  
This was not a case a long dead law writer's whose intentions were uncertain, and subject to interpretation.
 
But let's assume he is dead.  A term in Roman government and as defined in our Constitution as a  annual thing.  Censors get a double annual term.  Plain and simple.
 
It would appear the government is trying to hoodwink the people, by saying "You wanted this!"
 
A Strong Tribunate was constituted by Flavius Vedius to make sure that magistrates did not abuse the Constitution and bring the NR People to harm.  It is now up to them to do their jobs.
 
Q. Fabius Maximus      
 
Now, had indeed the Centuries been balanced       

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66478 From: Francesco Valenzano Date: 2009-06-08
Subject: Nova Roma Italia al Festival Occidente - 26-28 giugno 209, Marzabott

www.novaroma.org.gif


NOVA ROMA

Italia



KAINUA
Festival Occidente
26 - 28 Giugno 2009, Marzabotto

p024_1_02.jpg  p024_1_23.jpg  p024_1_21.jpg


Siamo lieti di annunciarvi che la sezione italiana di Nova Roma parteciperà ufficialmente alla prossima edizione di KAINUA, Festival Occidente che si terrà a Marzabotto (BO) dal 26 al  28 giugno 2009.

Occidente nasce dall’esigenza di evidenziare i più interessanti e preziosi segni delle civiltà italiche ed occidentali consentendo di leggere il territorio con occhi nuovi e facendo soffermare davanti a particolari che spesso ci sfuggono.
Tema portante di questa edizione di Occidente a Marzabotto è 
“Le Radici della Nostra Terra”, che, oltre a permette di comprendere meglio la storia dell’integrazione tra l’uomo e l’ambiente nel suo contesto storico e conoscere le evoluzioni e le trasformazioni che si sono susseguite durante i secoli nella vita quotidiana, affronterà i temi della visione del mondo e di ciò che sta oltre tra gli antichi.
Per permettere di vivere al meglio a tutti gli appassionati e i curiosi queste giornate, il lato della manifestazione più prettamente scientifico sarà affiancato da eventi di carattere divulgativo e ludico, come visite guidate ai musei ed aree archeologiche, giochi, riedizione degli sport antichi, concerti, ecc. Durante il festival sarà possibile visitare scavi ancora in esecuzione e cantieri archeologici, per consentire ai più esperti di capire il valore scientifico del sito. Un’intera sezione sarà dedicata ai viaggi nei sapori dell’antichità con degustazioni dei prodotti locali ed i particolari pranzi etruschi, mai rappresentati in un contesto di rievocazione storica utilizzando i piatti dell’età antica riprodotti per l'occasione. Eventi clou di Occidente saranno le serate intrise di spettacoli che coinvolgeranno i visitatori, mentre a chiudere ci saranno gli appuntamenti notturni. Occidente organizzerà una mercato dei mestieri antichi con attività artigianali in loco e vendita dei prodotti.

Nova Roma sarà presente con un banchetto storico, in collaborazione con l'Associazione Pomerium, dove saranno esposti il nuovo materiale di comunicazione e i nostri progetti per il futuro. 

Chiunque voglia aiutarci nell'organizzazione del presidio novaromano al Festival Occidente con la propria presenza o con ulteriori approfondimenti da esporre, è invitato a contattare al più presto Gaius Aurelius Vindex all'indirizzo e-mail g_a_vindex@... (g_a_vindex @ yahoo.it)

Per tutti gli altri l'invito è a venirci a trovare a Marzabotto l'ultimo week-end di giugno, per bere insieme un bicchiere di vino e discutere amabilmente del nostro amore per Roma Antica. Per ulteriori informazioni sul festival visitate www.festivaloccidente.it

Vi aspettiamo numerosi!!!


Nova Roma Italia



Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66479 From: marcushoratius Date: 2009-06-08
Subject: a. d. VI Eidus Iuniae: Dedication of the Temple of Mens on the Capit
M. Moravius Piscinus cultoribus Deorum et omnibus salutem plurimam dicit: Iubeo bono animo esse.

Hodie est ante diem VI Eidus Iuniae; haec dies nefastus est: Menti in Capitolino

AUC 536 /217 BCE: Vow of the Temple of Mens in the wake of Flaminius' defeat to Hannibal at Lake Trasimene

"Q. Fabius Maximus was now Dictator for the second time. On the very day of his entrance upon office he summoned a meeting of the senate, and commenced by discussing matters of religion. He made it quite clear to the senators that C. Flaminius' fault lay much more in his neglect of the auspices and of his religious duties than in bad generalship and foolhardiness. The Gods Themselves, he maintained, must be consulted as to the necessary measures to avert Their displeasure, and he succeeded in getting a decree passed that the decemvirs should be ordered to consult the Sibylline Books, a course which is only adopted when the most alarming portents have been reported. After inspecting the Books of Fate they informed the senate that the vow which had been made to Mars in view of that war had not been duly discharged, and that it must be discharged afresh and on a much greater scale. The Great Games must be vowed to Jupiter, a temple to Venus Erycina and one to Mens; a lectisternium must be held and solemn intercessions made; a Sacred Spring must also be vowed. All these things must be done if the war was to be a successful one and the republic remain in the same position in which it was at the beginning of the war. As Fabius would be wholly occupied with the necessary arrangements for the war, the senate with the full approval of the pontifical college ordered the praetor, M. Aemilius, to take care that all these orders were carried out in good time." ~ Titus Livius 22.9

"Meanwhile the two commissioners were appointed for the dedication of temples: T. Otacilius Crassus dedicated the temple to Mens, Q. Fabius Maximus the one to Venus Erycina. Both are on the Capitol, separated only by a water channel." ~ Titus Livius 23.31

Nearly two centuries later Cicero felt compelled to explain temples that had been dedicated to abstract divinities like Honos, Virtus, and Mens during the Punic Wars.

"The wisest men of Greece as well as our own ancestors defined and named many other kinds of Gods after the great benefits they bestow, and with good reason. For the believed that whatever brought great advantage to the human race could come about only through divine benevolence towards men. So sometimes they called what was produced by a God by the name of the deity itself, as when we refer to wheat as Ceres or to wine as Liber. This explains the line in Terence, 'without Ceres, and without Liber, Venus is cold.' Or sometimes, conversely, a deity is named after a particular quality that contains some powerful force, like Fides and Mens... (Virtus, Honos, Ops, Salus, Concordia, Libertas, and Victoria). In the case of all these, because They have such force that they could not possibly be controlled except by a God, the quality itself has been designated divine. Â…Accordingly, those deities who gave rise to various benefits owed their deification to the size of the benefits they bestowed, and indeed those names that I just mentioned make clear the power that resides in each God." ~ M. Tullius Cicero, De Natura Deorum 2.60-62

"Let them worship as deities ... those qualities through which men may gain access to Heaven – Mens, Virtus, Pietas, Fides; of these virtues let there be shrines, but none for any of the vices." ~ M. Tullius Cicero, De Legibus 2.19

This idea that such qualities and virtues bring us closer to the Gods comes, perhaps, from the epicurean philosopher Philodemus In the third book of 'On Piety' Philodemus discusses how the Gods live Their lives together in Heaven. All are Equal; all are Self-Sufficient, and yet They choose to live together in Friendship. Philodemus also follows the guidelines of Epicurus on participating in the culti Deorum ex partria of others, even onto initiations, because, by meditating on Their Happiness and Virtue, it helps us to become as much as the Gods as is possible.

However, these are later ideas, a redaction by philosophers. It is fairly clear that the dedication of a temple to Mens had nothing to do with philosophy. It was a practical decision of the civil authorities for the civil authorities, as a public cultus to remind future magistrates to attend on all of their duties, especially their religious duties. It was a politico-religious message that Fabius Maximus wished to project , and yet, perhaps more, it projected a cynicism towards the religio Romana with which Cicero, in the following centuries, had to struggle.


AUC 818 / 65 CE: The Antonia in Jerusalem was captured by rebels at the beginning of the Jewish Revolt

AUC 821 / 68 CE: Galba recognized as emperor in Rome.

AUC 839 / 86 CE: Day three of the ludi Capitolini.

AUC 957 / 204 CE: Day five of the ludi Latini et Graeci honorarii

AUC 971 / 218 CE: Victory of Legio III Gallica on behalf of Elagabalus over the emperorMacrinus near Antioch

"Macrinus, then encamped near Antioch, marvelling at the audacity of the women and at the same time regarding them with contempt, he sent Julianus the prefect with the legions to lay siege to them. But when Antoninus was shown to these troops, all turned to him in wonderful affection, and, killing Julianus the prefect, they all went over to him. Then, having a part of the army on his side, Antoninus marched against Macrinus, who was hastening to meet him. A battle was then fought, in which, as a result of the soldiers' treachery to him and their love for Antoninus, Macrinus was defeated. He did, indeed, escape from the battle together with his son and a few others, but he and Diadumenianus were afterwards slain in a certain village of Bithynia." ~ Historia Augusta, Macrinus 10


The Magical Powers of the Vestales Virgines

"At the present day, too, it is a general belief, that our Vestal virgins have the power, by uttering a certain prayer, to arrest the flight of runaway slaves, and to rivet them to the spot, provided they have not gone beyond the precincts of the City. If then these opinions be once received as truth, and if it be admitted that the gods do listen to certain prayers, or are influenced by set forms of words, we are bound to conclude in the affirmative upon the whole question. Our ancestors, no doubt, always entertained such a belief, and have even assured us, a thing by far the most difficult of all, that it is possible by such means to bring down lightning from heaven, as already14 mentioned on a more appropriate occasion." ~ Plinius Secundus, Historia Naturalis 28.3 (13)


Our thought for today is from L. Annaeus Seneca, Epistle 61:

"Virtue needs nothing to set it off; it is its own great glory, and it hallows the body in which it dwells."
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66480 From: Rusty Myers Date: 2009-06-08
Subject: Castra Romana 2009, Givhans SC
Castra Romana is looking great for 2009!

November 12-16 (13-15 event, 12, 16 setup/takedown)
www.castraromana.com

If you would like to vend, set up a table and show stuff off, do a display of a certain type of equipment (soldier or civilian) or set up and sort of display at all, please email me ASAP as I am working on the site plan in the Next few weeks.

James Mace, author and re-enactor, will be returning to sign his books and tell us of a possible movie!

Martin Keeley will be doing the Gladiator games (and I have a great spot for your demo table to... better "FLOW" this year... a lesson learned from Roman Days!).

I suspect we will have great attendance at Castra 09, so start letting me know as soon as possible if you are coming for sure. Setup starts Thursday November 12, and of course, the more, the merrier! Last year was awesome... and I cannot thank you gents who stayed (LEG V, XI, VI and others) to help dry us out and pack us up. As before we will feed the setup crew (and we ate good last year!)

The event is saturday the 14th. Friday the 13th (not a bad number for Rome...) will be finishing set up and introducing the new School of the Soldier drill and info that is underway now. Sunday the 15th is takedown (and again the more, the MUCH merrier!)

Domina Michelle Stewart has consented to once again grace us with her Roman Cooking for our Feast Saturday night. Again this will be $5 per person to be paid to Michelle in appreciation for the work she does. (SOTW buys the food as a thanks for you guys dealing with us!) Kids will have a seperate feast this year (they can hot dog themselves to death and not waste our pork roast, mussels, shrimp, duck, chicken, veal, lamb... etc etc etc etc.)

Paul Silva is working on a Medical impression, and I think we will have enought to debut it at Castra.

Kent Nilsson (The ROMAN ENGINEER MASTER of Leg VI) has yet another surprise up his sleeve for Castra too... Not giving it away...

The BEAST will of course be back, as will the TRIPASTOS.

Love to have someone set up the blacksmith/metal working display if you can. We can run a forge onsite.

Basket weavers, Photo takers, book vendors, Roman sellers, and anyone that is Roman/Ancients related is invited to attend, just let us know you are coming so we can plan space.

Preafectus Julianus has assured me that the slave who provided an ill chicken for last year's auspices has himself been sacrificed to assure us beautiful weather.

Barbarians are welcome to! We will have the little Barbarian camp, but we need BARBARIAN bodies for the arena... I mean, to display the alternative to Rome.

We will be doing more advertising than ever this year, so the crowd should be good too!

Rusty Myers
www.castraromana.com
info@...
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66481 From: PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@aol.com Date: 2009-06-08
Subject: Re: Intercessio
You might want to reconsider this action.  If you leave this time, I will do my very best to see that you do not come back.  I am getting very tired of many of our "founding citizens" being such cry-babies because they abrogated their authority by becoming inactive for long periods of time and then complain about how NR turned out in their absence.  If you want to go, GO, but don't expect to be able to weasel your way back in when your temper tantrum runs out.

Fl. Galerius Aurelianus


-----Original Message-----
From: Matt Hucke <hucke@...>
To: Nova Roma <Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com>
Cc: novaroma-announce@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Sun, 7 Jun 2009 11:28 am
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Intercessio




In 1998, I became one of the first persons to join Nova Roma, aside from that
now-vanished core group who had known each other before the founding, and who
had envisioned a Republic.

In those days, the web site was a handful of pages, with no interactive features.
I printed an application and dropped it into a mailbox, then waited weeks for
confirmation.

According to a list posted by the now-departed L Equitius Cincinnatus AUGUR,
Gens Octavia was the sixth gens to be founded; thus I might be the sixth most
senior citizen, or the eighth (some gentes had more than one member at first,
and the early records are incomplete).

In the early days, there was a real sense of camaraderie and friendship. You can
see this in the photos from Roman Days 2002 and earlier, and in the mailing list
archives. We had plans, plans to build something that people would enjoy, something
that would be truly great. The future looked bright; Nova Roma would grow, and would
unite people, not divide them.

All of that is gone now; destroyed by politics and by an obsession with silly
made-up "laws", to the exclusion of all else.

Three years ago, my friend C. Minucius Scaevola was driven away by the wretched
Leges Saliciae, after someone humiliated and defeated in one of the routine battles
of words that plague this list decided to get even, and "sue" his adversary in
kangaroo court.

One year ago, those same ridiculous leges were used to drive away another of my
friends, L. Equitius Cincinnatus, on absurd trumped-up charges of "treason" -
something to do with not sharing the archives of a mailing list with a few dozen
messages from years ago.

Those evil bastards even stripped him of his name.

At about the same time, Pater Patriae M. Cassius Iulianus was removed from office
as Pontifex Maximus - a LIFETIME position - because he had been intermittently
out of contact for a few years. He was tossed aside like a used kleenex -
but NOT ONE OF YOU WOULD BE HERE IF NOT FOR HIM. Those who schemed to remove him
then appointed one of themselves to his title - but he is a pretender, an Antipope,
an abomination.

I left the Senate while this was happening. The title of "Senator" held no meaning,
no honour, no dignity; and I would not work for an organization that perpetrated
such injustice, such vendetta, and such endless, useless, fighting.

Today, things are worse than ever before. You now have a Tribune trying to
overturn the results of an election. You have a cabal of people who threaten
"lawsuit" at the drop of a hat, and who constantly mention their imaginary
sock-puppet attorneys who agree with everything they say.

The Leges Salicia still exist, though only the ruling class seems to care for
them; they're a useful tool for prosecuting "traitors".

Your web site is an unmaintained wreck. Nobody knows how to fix or upgrade
anything.

A permanent, self-nurturing, self-sustaining bureaucracy rotates its members in and
out of every top position. Gone are the men of vision; they were too independent
for the hivemind to tolerate.

Nova Roma is dead, naked and humiliated, found dangling in a closet from a noose
of its own devising; the noose of excessive "law" and endless arguments the minutiae
of that "law". Nova Roma has strangled itself in an masturbatory act of
auto-litigious asphyxiation.

Today, a tribune attempts to void an election result, because a small number of
people continue to insist on one particular interpretation of yet another badly
written law. Rathern than doing something useful with their lives, they'll
endlessly scream "illegal! everything you do is illegal!", as if the entire body
of Nova Roma law was actually more worthwhile, more meaningful, more important
than a bucket of warm piss. They threaten to involve real-world lawyers at the
drop of a hat.

Now, with the Tribune's act, even the pretense of democracy is gone. NR is
nothing more than a battle ground for these two factions, neither of which
has any morals, any restraint, any empathy for persons who are not 100%
in agreement with them.

Both factions are equally appalling.

I, the founder of the sixth gens on 1 March 1998, hereby renounce my citizenship.

No one cares, of course; I stopped being an active member long ago, and took a
long break from this list (in retrospect, I should not have returned).

Today I make it official, and I ask the two Censores to mark my status as "resigned".

Matt Hucke,
formerly M. Octavius Gracchus,
Twice Censor, once Consul,
Aedile, Senator, Propraetor,
Magister Araneum longer than anyone,
founder of the sixth gens,
citizen March 1998 - June 2009.

--
Matt Hucke (hucke@cynico. net), programmer.
author, Graveyards of Illinois - http://graveyards. com/
CYNICO.NET - hosting from $8.33/month; domains $13 - http://cynico. net/
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66482 From: PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@aol.com Date: 2009-06-08
Subject: Re: Following in my Pater's footsteps
Diana,

I am going to write to you the same way I wrote to Marcus Octavius.  Do not let a temper tantrum make you quit NR.  If you change your mind later, as you have done in the past, I will do everything possible to prevent your return to Nova Roma.  The time for our founders and early citizens to act all outraged over what happened to the organization when you went away is past.  You can stay and try to fix this mess we are in or you can quit.  I would consider it a great personal loss if you do.  Please reconsider.

Fl. Galerius Aurelianus


-----Original Message-----
From: Diana Octavia Aventina <roman.babe@...>
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Sun, 7 Jun 2009 3:18 pm
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Following in my Pater's footsteps



Salvete all,

Following the footsteps of my Paterfamilias, Marcus Octavius, I hereby
renouce my citizenship in Nova Roma. He was my favorite person in NR for the
last 10 years and now he is gone too. This is the straw that has broken the
camels back.
I first found this mailing list in May of 1999 and we had fun then and a
goal. Now the only goal is to argue about who will have control of a group
that only argues. We are a joke amongst other Roman groups and yet the
people here keep arguing, now more than ever since Sulla is back. I want no
part of it anymore.

Sulla, I wish that you never come back. Send me all the hate mail that you
want, and call me a back stabber because I don't give a crap what you say. I
was never a freind of yours anyway. Our Vesta was right when she said that
you were a cancer. You and Poplicola and a few others are intent on killing
NR and you are doing a good job of it.

Vale,
Joanne Agate
formerly Diana Octavia Aventina

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66483 From: PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@aol.com Date: 2009-06-08
Subject: Re: Intercessio
Actually, old friend, the Tribunes can pronounce intercessio against the actions of any magistrate if they feel it violates the Constitution.  While I feel terrible that I did not pronounce intercessio against your candidacy during the intercessio, I cannot disagree with the action taken by my colleague Agrippa with his intercessio.  As it stands, you are not censor unless his intercessio is overruled by the majority of the Tribunes.  You must learn accept adversity with stoic resolve.

Fl. Galerius Aurelianus


-----Original Message-----
From: David Kling <tau.athanasios@...>
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Sun, 7 Jun 2009 3:37 pm
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: Intercessio



Salvete:

The results of a comita cannot be vetoed after a vote.  They must, according to law, be vetoed during the contio.  The other tribunes should understand this and correct their colleague.  The custodes do not issue edicts, they simply certify the results that are sent out by the diribitores.  There are a few people calling for "intercessio" but the majority of Nova Roma (ie., the centuries) are opposed to that.

Some will claim "follow the law" "follow the law" but only when it works for them.  The law states veto can happen during a contio. 

Valete:

Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus

On Sun, Jun 7, 2009 at 4:17 PM, aerdensrw <aerdensrw@yahoo. com> wrote:


I could be wrong, as I am not a lawyer, but I believe that, in general, one must judge a law's meaning by what is explicit in it, not by what is implicit.

If the law applicable to determining Modianu' candidacy needs to be changed, let it be changed in the proper way so that the requirements for censorship candidacy will be clear and precise for future candidates.

We should not attempt to correct poorly-written legislation by overturning an election by the people. The people made their choice known; that choice should be allowed to stand.

The Comitia Centuriata election was supposed to settle this matter. If the election did not settle the matter, I begin to question why we have elections in Nova Roma, if their clear results can be endlessly disputed. Can the people's voice be so easily made irrelevant by those who disagree with the majority?

Trying to correct a law by backtracking after the people have already spoken is bad form, and it is more harmful to us than simply working with the results and forging ahead productively would be.

I ask the remaining tribuns to oppose this intercession.

Paulla Corva Gaudialis
Diribitrix suffecta
Lictrix curiata



Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66484 From: livia_plauta Date: 2009-06-08
Subject: Re: Intercessio
Salve Aureliane,
actually you are directing your rightful rage at the wrong target.
Octavius is one of those who never went away. He has been our webmaster for ages, and he's still hosting our site. I don't think he can be accused of inactivity.
He has always been correct and honest, and never abused the huge power derived from being webmaster and hosting our site.
Out of the BA crowd he's one of the most reasonable people and he has never joined anyone's outcries for lawsuits, or retaliations of any kind.
Believe me: this one is a citizen we want back, if it will ever be possible.

Optime vale,
Livia



>
> You might want to reconsider this action.? If you leave this time, I will do my very best to see that you do not come back.? I am getting very tired of many of our "founding citizens" being such cry-babies because they abrogated their authority by becoming inactive for long periods of time and then complain about how NR turned out in their absence.? If you want to go, GO, but don't expect to be able to weasel your way back in when your temper tantrum runs out.
>
> Fl. Galerius Aurelianus
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Matt Hucke <hucke@...>
> To: Nova Roma <Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com>
> Cc: novaroma-announce@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Sun, 7 Jun 2009 11:28 am
> Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Intercessio
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> In 1998, I became one of the first persons to join Nova Roma, aside from that
> now-vanished core group who had known each other before the founding, and who
> had envisioned a Republic.
>
> In those days, the web site was a handful of pages, with no interactive features.
> I printed an application and dropped it into a mailbox, then waited weeks for
> confirmation.
>
> According to a list posted by the now-departed L Equitius Cincinnatus AUGUR,
> Gens Octavia was the sixth gens to be founded; thus I might be the sixth most
> senior citizen, or the eighth (some gentes had more than one member at first,
> and the early records are incomplete).
>
> In the early days, there was a real sense of camaraderie and friendship. You can
> see this in the photos from Roman Days 2002 and earlier, and in the mailing list
> archives. We had plans, plans to build something that people would enjoy, something
> that would be truly great. The future looked bright; Nova Roma would grow, and would
> unite people, not divide them.
>
> All of that is gone now; destroyed by politics and by an obsession with silly
> made-up "laws", to the exclusion of all else.
>
> Three years ago, my friend C. Minucius Scaevola was driven away by the wretched
> Leges Saliciae, after someone humiliated and defeated in one of the routine battles
> of words that plague this list decided to get even, and "sue" his adversary in
> kangaroo court.
>
> One year ago, those same ridiculous leges were used to drive away another of my
> friends, L. Equitius Cincinnatus, on absurd trumped-up charges of "treason" -
> something to do with not sharing the archives of a mailing list with a few dozen
> messages from years ago.
>
> Those evil bastards even stripped him of his name.
>
> At about the same time, Pater Patriae M. Cassius Iulianus was removed from office
> as Pontifex Maximus - a LIFETIME position - because he had been intermittently
> out of contact for a few years. He was tossed aside like a used kleenex -
> but NOT ONE OF YOU WOULD BE HERE IF NOT FOR HIM. Those who schemed to remove him
> then appointed one of themselves to his title - but he is a pretender, an Antipope,
> an abomination.
>
> I left the Senate while this was happening. The title of "Senator" held no meaning,
> no honour, no dignity; and I would not work for an organization that perpetrated
> such injustice, such vendetta, and such endless, useless, fighting.
>
> Today, things are worse than ever before. You now have a Tribune trying to
> overturn the results of an election. You have a cabal of people who threaten
> "lawsuit" at the drop of a hat, and who constantly mention their imaginary
> sock-puppet attorneys who agree with everything they say.
>
> The Leges Salicia still exist, though only the ruling class seems to care for
> them; they're a useful tool for prosecuting "traitors".
>
> Your web site is an unmaintained wreck. Nobody knows how to fix or upgrade
> anything.
>
> A permanent, self-nurturing, self-sustaining bureaucracy rotates its members in and
> out of every top position. Gone are the men of vision; they were too independent
> for the hivemind to tolerate.
>
> Nova Roma is dead, naked and humiliated, found dangling in a closet from a noose
> of its own devising; the noose of excessive "law" and endless arguments the minutiae
> of that "law". Nova Roma has strangled itself in an masturbatory act of
> auto-litigious asphyxiation.
>
> Today, a tribune attempts to void an election result, because a small number of
> people continue to insist on one particular interpretation of yet another badly
> written law. Rathern than doing something useful with their lives, they'll
> endlessly scream "illegal! everything you do is illegal!", as if the entire body
> of Nova Roma law was actually more worthwhile, more meaningful, more important
> than a bucket of warm piss. They threaten to involve real-world lawyers at the
> drop of a hat.
>
> Now, with the Tribune's act, even the pretense of democracy is gone. NR is
> nothing more than a battle ground for these two factions, neither of which
> has any morals, any restraint, any empathy for persons who are not 100%
> in agreement with them.
>
> Both factions are equally appalling.
>
> I, the founder of the sixth gens on 1 March 1998, hereby renounce my citizenship.
>
> No one cares, of course; I stopped being an active member long ago, and took a
> long break from this list (in retrospect, I should not have returned).
>
> Today I make it official, and I ask the two Censores to mark my status as "resigned".
>
> Matt Hucke,
> formerly M. Octavius Gracchus,
> Twice Censor, once Consul,
> Aedile, Senator, Propraetor,
> Magister Araneum longer than anyone,
> founder of the sixth gens,
> citizen March 1998 - June 2009.
>
> --
> Matt Hucke (hucke@...), programmer.
> author, Graveyards of Illinois - http://graveyards.com/
> CYNICO.NET - hosting from $8.33/month; domains $13 - http://cynico.net/
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66485 From: PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@aol.com Date: 2009-06-08
Subject: Re: Intercessio!
Fl. Galerius Aurelianus Tribunus Plebis Ap. Galerio Aureliano Tribunus Plebis sal.

Please be aware, cousin, that if you are pronouncing an intercessio against the intercessio of Agrippa, you must follow the Lex Labiena de intercessione as modified by the later lex. 

The message you posted to the NR ML and the Tribunes List doesn't constitute an official action.

Vale.


-----Original Message-----
From: Robert Levee <galerius_of_rome@...>
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Sun, 7 Jun 2009 9:04 pm
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Intercessio!




Tribunis Plebis Ap.Galerius Aurelianus SPD

I the case of the intercessio ,against the outcome of the recent election and those who lift their voices in it's support ,are in my opinion laboring under a false premise.

Simply stated, is the fact that any such intercessio ,should have been raised during the contio,in that alloted time before the election took place,as stated in the Lex Fabia de ratione Comitiorum Centuriatorum (Nova Roma).So it is also my opinion that said action has no basis in the Lex(Nova Roma).

Vale et valete,
Ap.Galerius Aurelianus

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66486 From: PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@aol.com Date: 2009-06-08
Subject: Re: Intercessio
Fl. Galerius Aurelianus Tribunus Plebis L. Coruncanio Cato. sal.

Your message comes dangerously close to violating certain sections of the Consitution and the lex Dida Genima de potestate tribunicia could be applied.  I recommend that you withdraw the statement and rephrase it with terms such as "in your opinion."  If you continue to interfere with the official action of a Tribunus Plebis, I will bring the weight of the Summa Coercendi Potestas against you.  The same applies to any other citizen who interferes with the official action of a Tribunus Plebis.

Vale.



-----Original Message-----
From: Lucius Coruncanius Cato <l.coruncanius_cato@...>
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Mon, 8 Jun 2009 4:56 am
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Intercessio



L. Coruncanius Cato omn. spd,

I am with you, Venator, in this statement. Time for vetoing the candidacy ended with the contio. Now it is time to move forward. This intercesio is not only unlawful, as it comes long past the 72h period, but a very dangerous movement, as it is a long step backwards and sets up a preced ent for those who doesn't like the results of an election. One might not like the results, but trying to overturn them by veto is really antidemocratic, and those gestures are only seen in places where the voice of citizens or members means less than wet paper.

I also agree with the needing of rewriting some of the laws involved in this election, to make them pristine clear, with words stating what they intend to mean, and permitting no interpretation. I sent a proposal to the Law Review commitee on those leges, which has been ignored by most of those who complain about the meaning and interpretation of those laws.

This shows, to me, that these actions and wills from those persons are not for the better of NR, but an intent to bring down all what has been accomplished for the last 11 years. I know coexistence is hard sometimes, but we have to carry on with it. And Venator shows this spirit by not resigning when he does not like something, and by the will to be part of the solution, and not of the problem.

I too ask for the tribunes to block this intercessio, even when it is not legal and should not be placed, and I humbly ask you, tribune Agrippa, to think about what you are doing, why yo do it, and what are the effects.

Di vos incolumem custodiant.

--
L. Coruncanius Cato
Aedilis Curulis
Scriba Consulis Hispaniae

--- El dom, 7/6/09, Publius Ullerius Stephanus Venator <famila.ulleria. venii@gmail. com> escri bió:

De: Publius Ullerius Stephanus Venator <famila.ulleria. venii@gmail. com>
Asunto: Re: [Nova-Roma] Intercessio
Para: Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com
Fecha: domingo, 7 junio, 2009 7:11

Avete Omnes;

I ask the other tribunes, as a long time Cives Nova Roma, to help
things move along by opposing this Intercession.

I was a voice, albeit a fairly quiet one, in opposition to the
candidacy of Modianus for Censor.

I still believe the Law under which his candidacy was touted as legal
and opposed as illegal is poorly written and too open to
interpretation. Our Laws need clarity, brevity and simplicity. Law
must not only be for the lawyers, it must be primarily for the
understanding by and protection of the People.

We must needs not try and cover every situation; having macronational
law, statute and regulation, which supersedes what we do here.

However, the Vox Populi has been heard, and is that not the true
foundation of any Res Publica? If the People do not contest the
legitimacy of a Law, it stands.

The majority of the People, by their resounding silence, also lent
tacit approval to the candidacy of Modianus. This intercession is, in
my opinion, an ex post facto attempt at what should have been resolved
during the discussion before the Cista opened.

By the vote count and tally, Modianus has the confidence of a majority
of the members of the Centuries.

Yes, this note has an air of resignation about it; what's done is
done, que sera, sera.

There are problems, which need to be addressed, and I will try better
to be a part of the solution. I am not considering leaving, neither
the Senate, the Lictorship nor Nova Roma, though I will step back from
committee and scribal appointments to ponder things. (...and, yes, I
realize I'd already been a bit withdrawn in those arenas already.) I
need time to think.

To my friends herein, I know this is unexpected, but did you really
see something different coming, in light of my nature?

I have made no enemies in Nova Roma, though there are a few who I find
useless to the future of our endeavor. I shall no longer respond to
them, neither directly nor indirectly, neither here nor elsewhere.

In closing, I ask again that the other Tribunes block this
Intercession and be more proactive in the future.

============ ========= ========= ========= ==
In amicitia et fides -
Publius Ullerius Stephanus Venator
Civis circa Quintilis MMDCCLI a.u.c.
Senator et Lictor

Religio Septentrionalis - Poeta
------------ --------- --------- ---
May the Holy Powers smile on our efforts.
May the Spirits of our family lines nod in approval.
May we be of Worth to our fellow Nova Romans.

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66487 From: PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@aol.com Date: 2009-06-08
Subject: Re: Intercessio
Aureliane Livia sal.

Inactivity constitutes abrogation of authority and action.  There have been long periods of time that Marcus Octavius did not exercise his authority and reputation to prevent or support actions that could have helped NR toward its stated and original goals.  He could still stay and help fix the problems that he is pissing about rather than resign.  The problem is that he has always been, in my opinion, way too thin skinned.

Vale.


-----Original Message-----
From: livia_plauta <livia.plauta@...>
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Mon, 8 Jun 2009 12:34 pm
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Intercessio



Salve Aureliane,
actually you are directing your rightful rage at the wrong target.
Octavius is one of those who never went away. He has been our webmaster for ages, and he's still hosting our site. I don't think he can be accused of inactivity.
He has always been correct and honest, and never abused the huge power derived from being webmaster and hosting our site.
Out of the BA crowd he's one of the most reasonable people and he has never joined anyone's outcries for lawsuits, or retaliations of any kind.
Believe me: this one is a citizen we want back, if it will ever be possible.

Optime vale,
Livia

>
> You might want to reconsider this action.? If you leave this time, I will do my very best to see that you do not come back.? I am getting very tired of many of our "founding citizens" being such cry-babies because they abrogated their authority by becoming inactive for long periods of time and then complain about how NR turned out in their absence.? If you want to go, GO, but don't expect to be able to weasel your way back in when your temper tantrum runs out.
>
> Fl. Galerius Aurelianus
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Matt Hucke <hucke@...>
> To: Nova Roma <Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com>
> Cc: novaroma-announce@ yahoogroups. com
> Sent: Sun, 7 Jun 2009 11:28 am
> Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Intercessio
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> In 1998, I became one of the first persons to join Nova Roma, aside from that
> now-vanished core group who had known each other before the founding, and who
> had envisioned a Republic.
>
> In those days, the web site was a handful of pages, with no interactive features.
> I printed an application and dropped it into a mailbox, then waited weeks for
> confirmation.
>
> According to a list posted by the now-departed L Equitius Cincinnatus AUGUR,
> Gens Octavia was the sixth gens to be founded; thus I might be the sixth most
> senior citizen, or the eighth (some gentes had more than one member at first,
> and the early records are incomplete).
>
> In the early days, there was a real sense of camaraderie and friendship. You can
> see this in the photos from Roman Days 2002 and earlier, and in the mailing list
> archives. We had plans, plans to build something that people would enjoy, something
> that would be truly great. The future looked bright; Nova Roma would grow, and would
> unite people, not divide them.
>
> All of that is gone now; destroyed by politics and by an obsession with silly
> made-up "laws", to the exclusion of all else.
>
> Three years ago, my friend C. Minucius Scaevola was driven away by the wretched
> Leges Saliciae, after someone humiliated and defeated in one of the routine battles
> of words that plague this list decided to get even, and "sue" his adversary in
> kangaroo court.
>
> One year ago, those same ridiculous leges were used to drive away another of my
> friends, L. Equitius Cincinnatus, on absurd trumped-up charges of "treason" -
> something to do with not sharing the archives of a mailing list with a few dozen
> messages from years ago.
>
> Those evil bastards even stripped him of his name.
>
> At about the same time, Pater Patriae M. Cassius Iulianus was removed from office
> as Pontifex Maximus - a LIFETIME position - because he had been intermittently
> out of contact for a few years. He was tossed aside like a used kleenex -
> but NOT ONE OF YOU WOULD BE HERE IF NOT FOR HIM. Those who schemed to remove him
> then appointed one of themselves to his title - but he is a pretender, an Antipope,
> an abomination.
>
> I left the Senate while this was happening. The title of "Senator" held no meaning,
> no honour, no dignity; and I would not work for an organization that perpetrated
> such injustice, such vendetta, and such endless, useless, fighting.
>
> Today, things are worse than ever before. You now have a Tribune trying to
> overturn the results of an election. You have a cabal of people who threaten
> "lawsuit" at the drop of a hat, and who constantly mention their imaginary
> sock-puppet attorneys who agree with everything they say.
>
> The Leges Salicia still exist, though only the ruling class seems to care for
> them; they're a useful tool for prosecuting "traitors".
>
> Your web site is an unmaintained wreck. Nobody knows how to fix or upgrade
> anything.
>
> A permanent, self-nurturing, self-sustaining bureaucracy rotates its members in and
> out of every top position. Gone are the men of vision; they were too independent
> for the hivemind to tolerate.
>
> Nova Roma is dead, naked and humiliated, found dangling in a closet from a noose
> of its own devising; the noose of excessive "law" and endless arguments the minutiae
> of that "law". Nova Roma has strangled itself in an masturbatory act of
> auto-litigious asphyxiation.
>
> Today, a tribune attempts to void an election result, because a small number of
> people continue to insist on one particular interpretation of yet another badly
> written law. Rathern than doing something useful with their lives, they'll
> endlessly scream "illegal! everything you do is illegal!", as if the entire body
> of Nova Roma law was actually more worthwhile, more meaningful, more important
> than a bucket of warm piss. They threaten to involve real-world lawyers at the
> drop of a hat.
>
> Now, with the Tribune's act, even the pretense of democracy is gone. NR is
> nothing more than a battle ground for these two factions, neither of which
> has any morals, any restraint, any empathy for persons who are not 100%
> in agreement with them.
>
> Both factions are equally appalling.
>
> I, the founder of the sixth gens on 1 March 1998, hereby renounce my citizenship.
>
> No one cares, of course; I stopped being an active member long ago, and took a
> long break from this list (in retrospect, I should not have returned).
>
> Today I make it official, and I ask the two Censores to mark my status as "resigned".
>
> Matt Hucke,
> formerly M. Octavius Gracchus,
> Twice Censor, once Consul,
> Aedile, Senator, Propraetor,
> Magister Araneum longer than anyone,
> founder of the sixth gens,
> citizen March 1998 - June 2009.
>
> --
> Matt Hucke (hucke@...), programmer.
> author, Graveyards of Illinois - http://graveyards. com/
> CYNICO.NET - hosting from $8.33/month; domains $13 - http://cynico. net/
>

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66488 From: PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@aol.com Date: 2009-06-08
Subject: Re: Intercessio - Point of order
Fl. Galerius Aurelianus Tribunus Plebis s.p.d.

The intercessio of Gaius Vipsanius Agrippa against the custodes M. Lucretius Agricola, Gn. Cornelius Lentulus, M. Iulius Severus, and M. Cornelius Complutensis does NOT mean that Cato will be censor if the intercessio is allowed to stand unopposed for 72 hours.  It means that there will have to be another election.

Valete.


-----Original Message-----
From: canadaoccidentalis@...
To: Nova Roma <nova-roma@yahoogroups.com>; novaroma-announce@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Sun, 7 Jun 2009 9:31 am
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Intercessio




Tribunus Plebis Gaius Vipsanius Agrippa SPD

I pronounce intercessio against the custodes Marcus Lucretius Agricola and Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus in certifying the election of Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus as censor and against the consuls Marcus Iulius Severus and Marcus Cornelius Complutensis in accepting the election results. 

This action was requested by Senator Gnaeus Iulius Caesar, Senator Lucius Cornelius Sulla Felix, Quintus Valerius Poplicola, and Marcus Valerius Potitus.

Modianus cannot hold the office of censor. This would violate Section 1 of the Lex Cornelia Iunia de definitione intervallorum magistratuum; "no person shall hold the office of censor consecutively" with Section IV A of the constitution as the definition of the term 'office of censor'.

As the Lex Cornelia Iunia de definitione intervallorum magistratuum does not define the term 'office of censor', the Constitution is used by virtue of Section I B, giving precedence to the constitution as the highest legal authority.

The censorship is measured in a 2 year term and cannot be subdivided. Modianus cannot hold the office consecutively.

Gaius Vipsanius Agrippa
Tribunus Plebis
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66489 From: PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@aol.com Date: 2009-06-08
Subject: Re: Intercessio - Point of order
I should have posted "the custodes M. Lucretius Agricola &Gn. Cornelius Lentulus and the consuls M. Iulius Severus & M. Cornelius Complutensis."  I apologize for this.

Aureliane


-----Original Message-----
From: PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@...
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Mon, 8 Jun 2009 12:55 pm
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Intercessio - Point of order



Fl. Galerius Aurelianus Tribunus Plebis s.p.d.

The intercessio of Gaius Vipsanius Agrippa against the custodes M. Lucretius Agricola, Gn. Cornelius Lentulus, M. Iulius Severus, and M. Cornelius Complutensis does NOT mean that Cato will be censor if the intercessio is allowed to stand unopposed for 72 hours.  It means that there will have to be another election.

Valete.


-----Original Message-----
From: canadaoccidentalis@ yahoo.ca
To: Nova Roma <nova-roma@yahoogrou ps.com>; novaroma-announce@ yahoogroups. com
Sent: Sun, 7 Jun 2009 9:31 am
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Intercessio




Tribunus Plebis Gaius Vipsanius Agrippa SPD

I pronounce intercessio against the custodes Marcus Lucretius Agricola and Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus in certifying the election of Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus as censor and against the consuls Marcus Iulius Severus and Marcus Cornelius Complutensis in accepting the election results. 

This action was requested by Senator Gnaeus Iulius Caesar, Senator Lucius Cornelius Sulla Felix, Quintus Valerius Poplicola, and Marcus Valerius Potitus.

Modianus cannot hold the office of censor. This would violate Section 1 of the Lex Cornelia Iunia de definitione intervallorum magistratuum; "no person shall hold the office of censor consecutively" with Section IV A of the constitution as the definition of the term 'office of censor'.

As the Lex Cornelia Iunia de definitione intervallorum magistratuum does not define the term 'office of censor', the Constitution is used by virtue of Section I B, giving precedence to the constitution as the highest legal authority.

The censorship is measured in a 2 year term and cannot be subdivided. Modianus cannot hold the office consecutively.

Gaius Vipsanius Agrippa
Tribunus Plebis
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66490 From: M.C.C. Date: 2009-06-08
Subject: Diribitoris Suffecti

The Consuls, M. Curiatius Compultensis and M. Iulius Severus, extend their great appreciation and gratitude to Maxima Valeria Messallina, Publius Ullerius Stephanus Venator and Lucia Iulia Aquila who were appointed as diribitoris suffecti for the Censor Suffectus election.

We thank you for your selfless service to our beloved Res publica, our Nova Roma. We are grateful to your honest dedication to this difficult task and dismiss you with great honor.


Curate ut valeatis

--
M. Curiatius Complutensis


Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66491 From: Maior Date: 2009-06-08
Subject: Re: Intercessio:
M. Hortensia Fl. Galerio L. Coruncanioque spd;
Let us take a moment to look back to Rome to see what it is we are talking about: the tribunes of the plebs.

The tribunes of the plebs, historically, came into existance to protect the rights of the plebeians. That was their function and that was why their person was sacrosanct.

Our tribunes are here to protect the rights of the people, an election is the ultimate will of the people.

The people did not object to Modianus' candidacy during the legal time: the contio, thereby giving their approval. The people interpreted the law! The people decided Modianus was the one they wanted as censor; so they voted for him. The people made their will known.

So let us understand the the point of the tribunes in Nova Roma is to respect and enforce the people's rights, that is the meaning of their power.

As I pointed out, a tribune of the plebs never in the entire history of Rome vetoed an election, never interfered in an election.

All you will find in Roman history is that the tribunes would issue vetos during the contio, a pratice we have maintained.

Let us follow our mos, our values our beliefs. Republican Rome is our model, the gods of Rome our gods. The people of Nova Roma the masters.
bene valete in sapientam Mentis
Marca Hortensia Maior
sacerdos Mentis






>
> Fl. Galerius Aurelianus Tribunus Plebis L. Coruncanio Cato. sal.
>
> Your message comes dangerously close to violating certain sections of the Consitution and the lex Dida Genima de potestate tribunicia could be applied.  I recommend that you withdraw the statement and rephrase it with terms such as "in your opinion."  If you continue to interfere with the official action of a Tribunus Plebis, I will bring the weight of the Summa Coercendi Potestas against you.  The same applies to any other citizen who interferes with the official action of a Tribunus Plebis.
>
> Vale.
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Lucius Coruncanius Cato <l.coruncanius_cato@...>
> To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Mon, 8 Jun 2009 4:56 am
> Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Intercessio
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> L. Coruncanius Cato omn. spd,
>
> I am with you, Venator, in this statement. Time for vetoing the candidacy ended with the contio. Now it is time to move forward. This intercesio is not only unlawful, as it comes long past the 72h period, but a very dangerous movement, as it is a long step backwards and sets up a precedent for those who doesn't like the results of an election. One might not like the results, but trying to overturn them by veto is really antidemocratic, and those gestures are only seen in places where the voice of citizens or members means less than wet paper.
>
> I also agree with the needing of rewriting some of the laws involved in this election, to make them pristine clear, with words stating what they intend
> to mean, and permitting no interpretation. I sent a proposal to the Law Review commitee on those leges, which has been ignored by most of those who complain about the meaning and interpretation of those laws.
>
> This shows, to me, that these actions and wills from those persons are not for the better of NR, but an intent to bring down all what has been accomplished for the last 11 years. I know coexistence is hard sometimes, but we have to carry on with it. And Venator shows this spirit by not resigning when he does not like something, and by the will to be part of the solution, and not of the problem.
>
> I too ask for the tribunes to block this intercessio, even when it is not legal and should not be placed, and I humbly ask you, tribune Agrippa, to think about what you are doing, why yo do it, and what are the effects.
>
> Di vos incolumem custodiant.
>
> --
> L. Coruncanius Cato
> Aedilis Curulis
> Scriba Consulis Hispaniae
>
> --- El dom, 7/6/09, Publius Ullerius Stephanus Venator <famila.ulleria.venii@...> escribió:
>
>
> De: Publius Ullerius Stephanus Venator <famila.ulleria.venii@...>
> Asunto: Re: [Nova-Roma] Intercessio
> Para: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> Fecha: domingo, 7 junio, 2009 7:11
>
>
>
>
> Avete Omnes;
>
> I ask the other tribunes, as a long time Cives Nova Roma, to help
> things move along by opposing this Intercession.
>
> I was a voice, albeit a fairly quiet one, in opposition to the
> candidacy of Modianus for Censor.
>
> I still believe the Law under which his candidacy was touted as legal=0
> Aand opposed as illegal is poorly written and too open to
> interpretation. Our Laws need clarity, brevity and simplicity. Law
> must not only be for the lawyers, it must be primarily for the
> understanding by and protection of the People.
>
> We must needs not try and cover every situation; having macronational
> law, statute and regulation, which supersedes what we do here.
>
> However, the Vox Populi has been heard, and is that not the true
> foundation of any Res Publica? If the People do not contest the
> legitimacy of a Law, it stands.
>
> The majority of the People, by their resounding silence, also lent
> tacit approval to the candidacy of Modianus. This intercession is, in
> my opinion, an ex post facto attempt at what should have been resolved
> during the discussion before the Cista opened.
>
> By the vote count and tally, Modianus has the confidence of a majority
> of the members of the Centuries.
>
> Yes, this note has an air of resignation about it; what's done is
> done, que sera, sera.
>
> There are problems, which need to be addressed, and I will try better
> to be a part of the solution. I am not considering leaving, neither
> the Senate, the Lictorship nor Nova Roma, though I will step back from
> committee and scribal appointments to ponder things. (...and, yes, I
> realize I'd already been a bit withdrawn in those arenas already.) I
> need time to think.
>
> To my friends herein, I know this is unexpected, but did you really
> see something different coming, in light of my nature?
>
> I have made no enemies in Nova20Roma, though there are a few who I find
> useless to the future of our endeavor. I shall no longer respond to
> them, neither directly nor indirectly, neither here nor elsewhere.
>
> In closing, I ask again that the other Tribunes block this
> Intercession and be more proactive in the future.
>
> ============ ========= ========= ========= ==
> In amicitia et fides -
> Publius Ullerius Stephanus Venator
> Civis circa Quintilis MMDCCLI a.u.c.
> Senator et Lictor
>
> Religio Septentrionalis - Poeta
> ------------ --------- --------- ---
> May the Holy Powers smile on our efforts.
> May the Spirits of our family lines nod in approval.
> May we be of Worth to our fellow Nova Romans.
>