Selected messages in Nova-Roma group. Jun 8-11, 2009

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66491 From: Maior Date: 2009-06-08
Subject: Re: Intercessio:
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66493 From: PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@aol.com Date: 2009-06-08
Subject: Re: Intercessio:
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66494 From: Maior Date: 2009-06-08
Subject: ad. VI id. Iun. DIes Natalis , foundation day, of the temple to Men
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66495 From: Maior Date: 2009-06-08
Subject: Re: Intercessio:
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66496 From: Jesse Corradino Date: 2009-06-08
Subject: Re: Following in my Pater's footsteps
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66497 From: Maior Date: 2009-06-08
Subject: Re: Ad VI Id. Iun. Sacrifice to Mens Bona
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66498 From: PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@aol.com Date: 2009-06-08
Subject: Re: Following in my Pater's footsteps
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66499 From: D.O.A. Date: 2009-06-08
Subject: Re: Following in my Pater's footsteps
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66500 From: QFabiusMaxmi@aol.com Date: 2009-06-08
Subject: Re: Intercessio
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66501 From: Kirsteen Wright Date: 2009-06-08
Subject: Re: Following in my Pater's footsteps
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66502 From: Publius Ullerius Stephanus Venator Date: 2009-06-08
Subject: Re: Diribitoris Suffecti
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66503 From: Publius Ullerius Stephanus Venator Date: 2009-06-08
Subject: Another little brag. . .
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66504 From: L Julia Aquila Date: 2009-06-08
Subject: Re: Another little brag. . .
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66505 From: Maior Date: 2009-06-08
Subject: Re: Another little brag. . .
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66506 From: James Hooper Date: 2009-06-08
Subject: Re: Intercessio
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66507 From: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com Date: 2009-06-08
Subject: Posting rules in this Forum, 6/8/2009, 11:45 pm
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66508 From: Publius Ullerius Stephanus Venator Date: 2009-06-08
Subject: Re: Another little brag. . .
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66509 From: livia_plauta Date: 2009-06-08
Subject: Re: Another little brag. . .
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66510 From: livia_plauta Date: 2009-06-08
Subject: Re: Another little brag. . .
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66511 From: Publius Ullerius Stephanus Venator Date: 2009-06-08
Subject: Hearty Chicken Soup
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66512 From: Publius Ullerius Stephanus Venator Date: 2009-06-08
Subject: Re: Another little brag. . .
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66513 From: Publius Ullerius Stephanus Venator Date: 2009-06-08
Subject: Re: Another little brag. . .
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66514 From: Robert Levee Date: 2009-06-08
Subject: Intercessio!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66515 From: Steve Moore Date: 2009-06-08
Subject: Best Wishes on the Vestalia
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66516 From: Shoshana Hathaway Date: 2009-06-09
Subject: Re: Best Wishes on the Vestalia
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66517 From: Jesse Corradino Date: 2009-06-09
Subject: Re: Another little brag. . .
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66518 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2009-06-09
Subject: Re: Intercessio!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66520 From: Lucius Coruncanius Cato Date: 2009-06-09
Subject: Re: Following in my Pater's footsteps
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66521 From: Lucius Coruncanius Cato Date: 2009-06-09
Subject: Re: Intercessio
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66522 From: marcushoratius Date: 2009-06-09
Subject: a. d. V Eidus Iuniae: VESTALIA; Vacuna; Carrhae
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66523 From: Publius Ullerius Stephanus Venator Date: 2009-06-09
Subject: Re: Another little brag. . .
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66524 From: marcushoratius Date: 2009-06-09
Subject: Re: Intercessio!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66525 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2009-06-09
Subject: Re: Intercessio!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66526 From: L Julia Aquila Date: 2009-06-09
Subject: Re: Another little brag. . .
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66527 From: Jesse Corradino Date: 2009-06-09
Subject: Re: Intercessio!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66528 From: Jesse Corradino Date: 2009-06-09
Subject: Re: Another little brag. . .
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66529 From: Robert Levee Date: 2009-06-09
Subject: Intercessio!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66530 From: livia_plauta Date: 2009-06-09
Subject: Re: Another little brag. . .
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66531 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2009-06-09
Subject: Re: Another little brag. . .
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66532 From: Lyn Dowling Date: 2009-06-09
Subject: Re: Another little brag. . .
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66533 From: L Julia Aquila Date: 2009-06-09
Subject: Re: Another little brag. . .
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66534 From: L Julia Aquila Date: 2009-06-09
Subject: Re: Another little brag. . .
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66535 From: livia_plauta Date: 2009-06-09
Subject: Re: Another little brag. . .
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66536 From: livia_plauta Date: 2009-06-09
Subject: Re: Another little brag. . .
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66537 From: L Julia Aquila Date: 2009-06-09
Subject: Re: Another little brag. . .
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66538 From: Lyn Dowling Date: 2009-06-09
Subject: Re: Another little brag. . .
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66539 From: livia_plauta Date: 2009-06-09
Subject: Re: Another little brag. . .
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66540 From: Lyn Dowling Date: 2009-06-09
Subject: Re: Another little brag. . .
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66541 From: L Julia Aquila Date: 2009-06-09
Subject: Re: Another little brag. . .
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66542 From: livia_plauta Date: 2009-06-09
Subject: Re: Another little brag. . .
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66543 From: Lyn Dowling Date: 2009-06-09
Subject: Re: Another little brag. . .
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66544 From: Lyn Dowling Date: 2009-06-09
Subject: Re: Another little brag. . .
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66545 From: QFabiusMaxmi@aol.com Date: 2009-06-09
Subject: Re: Intercessio!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66546 From: livia_plauta Date: 2009-06-09
Subject: Re: Another little brag. . .
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66547 From: livia_plauta Date: 2009-06-09
Subject: Re: Another little brag. . .
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66548 From: livia_plauta Date: 2009-06-09
Subject: Re: Another little brag. . .
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66549 From: Lyn Dowling Date: 2009-06-09
Subject: Re: Another little brag. . .
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66550 From: Maior Date: 2009-06-09
Subject: Re: Intercessio!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66551 From: L Julia Aquila Date: 2009-06-09
Subject: Re: Another little brag. . .
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66552 From: l.coruncanius_cato@yahoo.com Date: 2009-06-09
Subject: Re: Intercessio
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66553 From: L Julia Aquila Date: 2009-06-09
Subject: Re: Another little brag. . .
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66554 From: Lyn Dowling Date: 2009-06-09
Subject: Re: Another little brag. . .
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66555 From: L Julia Aquila Date: 2009-06-09
Subject: Re: Another little brag. . .
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66556 From: marcushoratius Date: 2009-06-09
Subject: Re: Intercessio!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66557 From: L Julia Aquila Date: 2009-06-09
Subject: Re: Another little brag. . .
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66558 From: Lyn Dowling Date: 2009-06-09
Subject: Re: Another little brag. . .
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66559 From: aerdensrw Date: 2009-06-09
Subject: Re: Another little brag. . .
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66560 From: Jesse Corradino Date: 2009-06-09
Subject: Re: Another little brag. . .
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66561 From: aerdensrw Date: 2009-06-09
Subject: Re: Another little brag. . .
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66562 From: Jesse Corradino Date: 2009-06-09
Subject: Re: Another little brag. . .
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66563 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2009-06-09
Subject: Re: Intercessio!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66564 From: L Julia Aquila Date: 2009-06-09
Subject: Re: Another little brag. . .
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66565 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2009-06-09
Subject: Fwd: Yahoo! Groups downtime this Thursday (June 11, 2009)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66566 From: L Julia Aquila Date: 2009-06-09
Subject: Re: Another little brag. . .
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66567 From: L Julia Aquila Date: 2009-06-09
Subject: Re: Another little brag. . .
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66568 From: L Julia Aquila Date: 2009-06-09
Subject: Re: Another little brag. . .
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66569 From: Publius Ullerius Stephanus Venator Date: 2009-06-09
Subject: Re: Another little brag. . .
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66570 From: L Julia Aquila Date: 2009-06-09
Subject: Re: Classic Poetry, Prose, Proems
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66571 From: marcushoratius Date: 2009-06-09
Subject: Re: Intercessio!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66572 From: marcushoratius Date: 2009-06-09
Subject: Re: Another little brag. . .
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66573 From: L Julia Aquila Date: 2009-06-09
Subject: Re: Roman cookery
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66574 From: L Julia Aquila Date: 2009-06-09
Subject: Re: Another little brag. . .
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66575 From: L Julia Aquila Date: 2009-06-09
Subject: Re: Another little brag. . .
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66576 From: Publius Ullerius Stephanus Venator Date: 2009-06-09
Subject: Charlie Lucky, was Re: Another little brag. . .
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66577 From: Publius Ullerius Stephanus Venator Date: 2009-06-09
Subject: Re: Another little brag. . .
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66578 From: violetphearsen@yahoo.com Date: 2009-06-09
Subject: Happy Vestalia to all!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66579 From: L Julia Aquila Date: 2009-06-09
Subject: Re: Classic Poetry, Prose, Proems
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66580 From: Timothy or Stephen Gallagher Date: 2009-06-09
Subject: Ellis Island (OT)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66581 From: M•IVL• SEVERVS Date: 2009-06-09
Subject: Re: Happy Vestalia to all!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66582 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2009-06-09
Subject: Re: Intercessio!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66583 From: Maior Date: 2009-06-09
Subject: Re: Intercessio!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66584 From: L Julia Aquila Date: 2009-06-10
Subject: Re: Classic Poetry, Prose, Proems
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66585 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2009-06-10
Subject: Re: Intercessio!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66586 From: Maior Date: 2009-06-10
Subject: Re: Intercessio!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66587 From: marcushoratius Date: 2009-06-10
Subject: a. d. IV Eidus Iuniae: VESTALIA
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66588 From: lichtbroeder Date: 2009-06-10
Subject: LARARIUM, STATUES AND OIL LAMPS
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66589 From: PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@aol.com Date: 2009-06-10
Subject: Re: Intercessio
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66590 From: PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@aol.com Date: 2009-06-10
Subject: Re: Intercessio!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66591 From: PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@aol.com Date: 2009-06-10
Subject: Re: Intercessio!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66592 From: PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@aol.com Date: 2009-06-10
Subject: Intercessio - End of the period allotted for tribuni plebis to state
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66593 From: Jesse Corradino Date: 2009-06-10
Subject: Re: Another little brag. . .
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66594 From: M.C.C. Date: 2009-06-10
Subject: Re: Intercessio - End of the period allotted for tribuni plebis to s
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66595 From: Jesse Corradino Date: 2009-06-10
Subject: Re: Roman cookery
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66596 From: Roger Date: 2009-06-10
Subject: Re: Intercessio - End of the period allotted for tribuni plebis to s
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66597 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2009-06-10
Subject: Re: Intercessio!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66598 From: PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@aol.com Date: 2009-06-10
Subject: Re: Intercessio - End of the period allotted for tribuni plebis to s
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66599 From: PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@aol.com Date: 2009-06-10
Subject: Re: Intercessio - End of the period allotted for tribuni plebis to s
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66600 From: Robert Levee Date: 2009-06-10
Subject: intercessio!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66601 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2009-06-10
Subject: Re: Intercessio - End of the period allotted for tribuni plebis to s
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66602 From: M.C.C. Date: 2009-06-10
Subject: Re: Intercessio - End of the period allotted for tribuni plebis to s
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66603 From: M.C.C. Date: 2009-06-10
Subject: Re: Intercessio - End of the period allotted for tribuni plebis to s
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66604 From: PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@aol.com Date: 2009-06-10
Subject: Re: Intercessio - End of the period allotted for tribuni plebis to s
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66605 From: marcushoratius Date: 2009-06-10
Subject: Re: Intercessio!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66606 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2009-06-10
Subject: Re: Intercessio!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66607 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2009-06-10
Subject: Re: Intercessio - End of the period allotted for tribuni plebis to s
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66608 From: politicog Date: 2009-06-10
Subject: Re: Intercessio - End of the period allotted for tribuni plebis to s
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66609 From: Maior Date: 2009-06-10
Subject: Re: Intercessio!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66610 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2009-06-10
Subject: Re: Intercessio - End of the period allotted for tribuni plebis to s
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66611 From: marcushoratius Date: 2009-06-10
Subject: Re: Intercessio!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66612 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2009-06-10
Subject: Re: Intercessio!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66613 From: fauxrari Date: 2009-06-10
Subject: Re: Roman cookery
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66614 From: Publius Ullerius Stephanus Venator Date: 2009-06-10
Subject: Re: Another little brag. . .
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66615 From: M.C.C. Date: 2009-06-10
Subject: Re: Intercessio - End of the period allotted for tribuni plebis to s
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66616 From: l.coruncanius_cato@yahoo.com Date: 2009-06-10
Subject: Re: Intercessio
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66617 From: Maior Date: 2009-06-10
Subject: Re: Intercessio
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66618 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2009-06-10
Subject: Re: Intercessio
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66619 From: L Julia Aquila Date: 2009-06-10
Subject: Classic Poetry, Prose, Proems, Literature Excerpts
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66620 From: PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@aol.com Date: 2009-06-10
Subject: Re: Intercessio
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66621 From: Maior Date: 2009-06-10
Subject: Re: Intercessio
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66622 From: Maior Date: 2009-06-10
Subject: Re: Intercessio
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66623 From: Steve Moore Date: 2009-06-10
Subject: Vesta in the Stars
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66624 From: Gaius Petronius Dexter Date: 2009-06-10
Subject: Re: Intercessio
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66625 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2009-06-10
Subject: Re: Intercessio
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66626 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2009-06-10
Subject: Re: Intercessio
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66628 From: Shoshana Hathaway Date: 2009-06-11
Subject: Re: Classic Poetry, Prose, Proems
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66630 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2009-06-11
Subject: Re: Intercessio
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66631 From: Maior Date: 2009-06-11
Subject: Re: Intercessio
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66632 From: Gaius Aurelius Vindex Date: 2009-06-11
Subject: [NR_Urbs] Nova Roma Italia al Festival Occidente - 26-28 giugno 209,
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66633 From: marcushoratius Date: 2009-06-11
Subject: a. d. III Eidus Iuniae: Matralia; Mater Matuta
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66634 From: Paco Benitez Aguilar Date: 2009-06-11
Subject: Re: [NR_Urbs] Nova Roma Italia al Festival Occidente - 26-28 giugno
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66635 From: Solomon Johri Date: 2009-06-11
Subject: Re: Intercessio - End of the period allotted for tribuni plebis to s
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66636 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2009-06-11
Subject: Re: Intercessio - End of the period allotted for tribuni plebis to s
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66637 From: Lucius Coruncanius Cato Date: 2009-06-11
Subject: Re: Intercessio - End of the period allotted for tribuni plebis to s
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66638 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2009-06-11
Subject: Re: Intercessio - End of the period allotted for tribuni plebis to s
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66639 From: Jesse Corradino Date: 2009-06-11
Subject: Re: Another little brag. . .
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66640 From: L Julia Aquila Date: 2009-06-11
Subject: Re: Another little brag. . .
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66641 From: L Julia Aquila Date: 2009-06-11
Subject: Re: Classic Poetry, Prose, Proems, Literature Excerpts
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66642 From: L Julia Aquila Date: 2009-06-11
Subject: Re: Roman cookery
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66643 From: wuffa2001 Date: 2009-06-11
Subject: Roman cookery II Request for Help
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66644 From: Titus Flavius Aquila Date: 2009-06-11
Subject: AW: [Nova-Roma] Intercessio - End of the period allotted for tribuni
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66645 From: livia_plauta Date: 2009-06-11
Subject: Cato's law proposal (Was: Re: Intercessio - )
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66646 From: Shoshana Hathaway Date: 2009-06-11
Subject: Re: Roman cookery II Request for Help
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66647 From: L Julia Aquila Date: 2009-06-11
Subject: Re: Roman cookery II Request for Help
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66648 From: L Julia Aquila Date: 2009-06-11
Subject: Re: Roman cookery II Request for Help
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66649 From: Q. Valerius Poplicola Date: 2009-06-11
Subject: Cato's law proposal (Was: Re: Intercessio - )
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66650 From: L Julia Aquila Date: 2009-06-11
Subject: Re: Roman cookery
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66651 From: livia_plauta Date: 2009-06-11
Subject: Cato's law proposal (Was: Re: Intercessio - )
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66652 From: Q. Valerius Poplicola Date: 2009-06-11
Subject: Valid Intercessio
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66653 From: iulius sabinus Date: 2009-06-11
Subject: Re: Cato's law proposal (Was: Re: Intercessio - )
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66654 From: Q. Valerius Poplicola Date: 2009-06-11
Subject: Re: Cato's law proposal (Was: Re: Intercessio - )
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66655 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2009-06-11
Subject: Cato's law proposal (Was: Re: Intercessio - )
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66656 From: Gaius Petronius Dexter Date: 2009-06-11
Subject: Re: Valid Intercessio
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66657 From: Titus Flavius Aquila Date: 2009-06-11
Subject: AW: [Nova-Roma] Re: Intercessio not valid
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66658 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2009-06-11
Subject: Re: Valid Intercessio
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66659 From: livia_plauta Date: 2009-06-11
Subject: Cato's law proposal (Was: Re: Intercessio - )
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66660 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2009-06-11
Subject: Re: Intercessio not valid
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66661 From: Q. Valerius Poplicola Date: 2009-06-11
Subject: Re: Valid Intercessio
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66662 From: Gaius Petronius Dexter Date: 2009-06-11
Subject: Re: Valid Intercessio
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66663 From: QFabiusMaxmi@aol.com Date: 2009-06-11
Subject: Re: Valid Intercessio
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66664 From: Q. Valerius Poplicola Date: 2009-06-11
Subject: Re: Valid Intercessio
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66665 From: Gnaeus Iulius Caesar Date: 2009-06-11
Subject: Re: Cato's law proposal (Was: Re: Intercessio - )
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66666 From: Q. Valerius Poplicola Date: 2009-06-11
Subject: Poplicola's Law Proposal (Not Cato's)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66667 From: Q. Valerius Poplicola Date: 2009-06-11
Subject: Re: Intercessio not valid
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66668 From: iulius sabinus Date: 2009-06-11
Subject: Re: Cato's law proposal (Was: Re: Intercessio - )
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66669 From: QFabiusMaxmi@aol.com Date: 2009-06-11
Subject: Re: Valid Intercessio
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66670 From: Gnaeus Iulius Caesar Date: 2009-06-11
Subject: Re: Cato's law proposal (Was: Re: Intercessio - )



Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66491 From: Maior Date: 2009-06-08
Subject: Re: Intercessio:
M. Hortensia Fl. Galerio L. Coruncanioque spd;
Let us take a moment to look back to Rome to see what it is we are talking about: the tribunes of the plebs.

The tribunes of the plebs, historically, came into existance to protect the rights of the plebeians. That was their function and that was why their person was sacrosanct.

Our tribunes are here to protect the rights of the people, an election is the ultimate will of the people.

The people did not object to Modianus' candidacy during the legal time: the contio, thereby giving their approval. The people interpreted the law! The people decided Modianus was the one they wanted as censor; so they voted for him. The people made their will known.

So let us understand the the point of the tribunes in Nova Roma is to respect and enforce the people's rights, that is the meaning of their power.

As I pointed out, a tribune of the plebs never in the entire history of Rome vetoed an election, never interfered in an election.

All you will find in Roman history is that the tribunes would issue vetos during the contio, a pratice we have maintained.

Let us follow our mos, our values our beliefs. Republican Rome is our model, the gods of Rome our gods. The people of Nova Roma the masters.
bene valete in sapientam Mentis
Marca Hortensia Maior
sacerdos Mentis






>
> Fl. Galerius Aurelianus Tribunus Plebis L. Coruncanio Cato. sal.
>
> Your message comes dangerously close to violating certain sections of the Consitution and the lex Dida Genima de potestate tribunicia could be applied.  I recommend that you withdraw the statement and rephrase it with terms such as "in your opinion."  If you continue to interfere with the official action of a Tribunus Plebis, I will bring the weight of the Summa Coercendi Potestas against you.  The same applies to any other citizen who interferes with the official action of a Tribunus Plebis.
>
> Vale.
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Lucius Coruncanius Cato <l.coruncanius_cato@...>
> To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Mon, 8 Jun 2009 4:56 am
> Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Intercessio
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> L. Coruncanius Cato omn. spd,
>
> I am with you, Venator, in this statement. Time for vetoing the candidacy ended with the contio. Now it is time to move forward. This intercesio is not only unlawful, as it comes long past the 72h period, but a very dangerous movement, as it is a long step backwards and sets up a precedent for those who doesn't like the results of an election. One might not like the results, but trying to overturn them by veto is really antidemocratic, and those gestures are only seen in places where the voice of citizens or members means less than wet paper.
>
> I also agree with the needing of rewriting some of the laws involved in this election, to make them pristine clear, with words stating what they intend
> to mean, and permitting no interpretation. I sent a proposal to the Law Review commitee on those leges, which has been ignored by most of those who complain about the meaning and interpretation of those laws.
>
> This shows, to me, that these actions and wills from those persons are not for the better of NR, but an intent to bring down all what has been accomplished for the last 11 years. I know coexistence is hard sometimes, but we have to carry on with it. And Venator shows this spirit by not resigning when he does not like something, and by the will to be part of the solution, and not of the problem.
>
> I too ask for the tribunes to block this intercessio, even when it is not legal and should not be placed, and I humbly ask you, tribune Agrippa, to think about what you are doing, why yo do it, and what are the effects.
>
> Di vos incolumem custodiant.
>
> --
> L. Coruncanius Cato
> Aedilis Curulis
> Scriba Consulis Hispaniae
>
> --- El dom, 7/6/09, Publius Ullerius Stephanus Venator <famila.ulleria.venii@...> escribió:
>
>
> De: Publius Ullerius Stephanus Venator <famila.ulleria.venii@...>
> Asunto: Re: [Nova-Roma] Intercessio
> Para: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> Fecha: domingo, 7 junio, 2009 7:11
>
>
>
>
> Avete Omnes;
>
> I ask the other tribunes, as a long time Cives Nova Roma, to help
> things move along by opposing this Intercession.
>
> I was a voice, albeit a fairly quiet one, in opposition to the
> candidacy of Modianus for Censor.
>
> I still believe the Law under which his candidacy was touted as legal=0
> Aand opposed as illegal is poorly written and too open to
> interpretation. Our Laws need clarity, brevity and simplicity. Law
> must not only be for the lawyers, it must be primarily for the
> understanding by and protection of the People.
>
> We must needs not try and cover every situation; having macronational
> law, statute and regulation, which supersedes what we do here.
>
> However, the Vox Populi has been heard, and is that not the true
> foundation of any Res Publica? If the People do not contest the
> legitimacy of a Law, it stands.
>
> The majority of the People, by their resounding silence, also lent
> tacit approval to the candidacy of Modianus. This intercession is, in
> my opinion, an ex post facto attempt at what should have been resolved
> during the discussion before the Cista opened.
>
> By the vote count and tally, Modianus has the confidence of a majority
> of the members of the Centuries.
>
> Yes, this note has an air of resignation about it; what's done is
> done, que sera, sera.
>
> There are problems, which need to be addressed, and I will try better
> to be a part of the solution. I am not considering leaving, neither
> the Senate, the Lictorship nor Nova Roma, though I will step back from
> committee and scribal appointments to ponder things. (...and, yes, I
> realize I'd already been a bit withdrawn in those arenas already.) I
> need time to think.
>
> To my friends herein, I know this is unexpected, but did you really
> see something different coming, in light of my nature?
>
> I have made no enemies in Nova20Roma, though there are a few who I find
> useless to the future of our endeavor. I shall no longer respond to
> them, neither directly nor indirectly, neither here nor elsewhere.
>
> In closing, I ask again that the other Tribunes block this
> Intercession and be more proactive in the future.
>
> ============ ========= ========= ========= ==
> In amicitia et fides -
> Publius Ullerius Stephanus Venator
> Civis circa Quintilis MMDCCLI a.u.c.
> Senator et Lictor
>
> Religio Septentrionalis - Poeta
> ------------ --------- --------- ---
> May the Holy Powers smile on our efforts.
> May the Spirits of our family lines nod in approval.
> May we be of Worth to our fellow Nova Romans.
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66493 From: PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@aol.com Date: 2009-06-08
Subject: Re: Intercessio:
Aureliane Maior sal.

You are entitled to your opinion of the duties of the Tribuni and I certainly respect that right considering your past service to the Res Publica.  However, since our opinions do not agree and I am currently a sitting Tribunus, you must allow me to act as my conscience and interpretation of the Constitution and leges dictate.  I would like to point out that I have not yet either agreed or disagreed with the current intercessio of my colleague Agrippa.

Vale.


-----Original Message-----
From: Maior <rory12001@...>
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Mon, 8 Jun 2009 1:55 pm
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Intercessio:



M. Hortensia Fl. Galerio L. Coruncanioque spd;
Let us take a moment to look back to Rome to see what it is we are talking about: the tribunes of the plebs.

The tribunes of the plebs, historically, came into existance to protect the rights of the plebeians. That was their function and that was why their person was sacrosanct.

Our tribunes are here to protect the rights of the people, an election is the ultimate will of the people.

The people did not object to Modianus' candidacy during the legal time: the contio, thereby giving their approval. The people interpreted the law! The people decided Modianus was the one they wanted as censor; so they voted for him. The people made their will known.

So let us understand the the point of the tribunes in Nova Roma is to respect and enforce the people's rights, that is the meaning of their power.

As I pointed out, a tribune of the plebs never in the entire history of Rome vetoed an election, never interfered in an election.

All you will find in Roman history is that the tribunes would issue vetos during the contio, a pratice we have maintained.

Let us follow our mos, our values our beliefs. Republican Rome is our model, the gods of Rome our gods. The people of Nova Roma the masters.
bene valete in sapientam Mentis
Marca Hortensia Maior
sacerdos Mentis

>
> Fl. Galerius Aurelianus Tribunus Plebis L. Coruncanio Cato. sal.
>
> Your message comes dangerously close to violating certain sections of the Consitution and the lex Dida Genima de potestate tribunicia could be applied.  I recommend that you withdraw the statement and rephrase it with terms such as "in your opinion."  If you continue to interfere with the official action of a Tribunus Plebis, I will bring the weight of the Summa Coercendi Potestas against you.  The same applies to any other citizen who interferes with the official action of a Tribunus Plebis.
>
> Val
e.
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Lucius Coruncanius Cato <l.coruncanius_ cato@...>
> To: Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com
> Sent: Mon, 8 Jun 2009 4:56 am
> Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Intercessio
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> L. Coruncanius Cato omn. spd,
>
> I am with you, Venator, in this statement. Time for vetoing the candidacy ended with the contio. Now it is time to move forward. This intercesio is not only unlawful, as it comes long past the 72h period, but a very dangerous movement, as it is a long step backwards and sets up a precedent for those who doesn't like the results of an election. One might not like the results, but trying to overturn them by veto is really antidemocratic, and those gestures are only seen in places where the voice of citizens or members means less than wet paper.
>
> I also agree with the needing of rewriting some of the laws involved in this election, to make them pristine clear, with words stating what they intend
> to mean, and permitting no interpretation. I sent a proposal to the Law Review commitee on those leges, which has been ignored by most of those who complain about the meaning and interpretation of those laws.
>
> This shows, to me, that these actions and wills from those persons are not for the=2
0better of NR, but an intent to bring down all what has been accomplished for the last 11 years. I know coexistence is hard sometimes, but we have to carry on with it. And Venator shows this spirit by not resigning when he does not like something, and by the will to be part of the solution, and not of the problem.
>
> I too ask for the tribunes to block this intercessio, even when it is not legal and should not be placed, and I humbly ask you, tribune Agrippa, to think about what you are doing, why yo do it, and what are the effects.
>
> Di vos incolumem custodiant.
>
> --
> L. Coruncanius Cato
> Aedilis Curulis
> Scriba Consulis Hispaniae
>
> --- El dom, 7/6/09, Publius Ullerius Stephanus Venator <famila.ulleria. venii@... > escribió:
>
>
> De: Publius Ullerius Stephanus Venator <famila.ulleria. venii@... >
> Asunto: Re: [Nova-Roma] Intercessio
> Para: Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com
> Fecha: domingo, 7 junio, 2009 7:11
>
>
>
>
> Avete Omnes;
>
> I ask the other tribunes, as a long time Cives Nova Roma, to help
> things move along by opposing this Intercession.
>
> I was a voice, albeit a fairly quiet one, in opposition to the
> candidacy of Modianus for Censor.
>
> I still believe the Law under which his candidacy was touted=2
0as legal=0
> Aand opposed as illegal is poorly written and too open to
> interpretation. Our Laws need clarity, brevity and simplicity. Law
> must not only be for the lawyers, it must be primarily for the
> understanding by and protection of the People.
>
> We must needs not try and cover every situation; having macronational
> law, statute and regulation, which supersedes what we do here.
>
> However, the Vox Populi has been heard, and is that not the true
> foundation of any Res Publica? If the People do not contest the
> legitimacy of a Law, it stands.
>
> The majority of the People, by their resounding silence, also lent
> tacit approval to the candidacy of Modianus. This intercession is, in
> my opinion, an ex post facto attempt at what should have been resolved
> during the discussion before the Cista opened.
>
> By the vote count and tally, Modianus has the confidence of a majority
> of the members of the Centuries.
>
> Yes, this note has an air of resignation about it; what's done is
> done, que sera, sera.
>
> There are problems, which need to be addressed, and I will try better
> to be a part of the solution. I am not considering leaving, neither
> the Senate, the Lictorship nor Nova Roma, though I will step back from
> committee and scribal appointments to ponder things. (...and, yes, I
> realize I
'd already been a bit withdrawn in those arenas already.) I
> need time to think.
>
> To my friends herein, I know this is unexpected, but did you really
> see something different coming, in light of my nature?
>
> I have made no enemies in Nova20Roma, though there are a few who I find
> useless to the future of our endeavor. I shall no longer respond to
> them, neither directly nor indirectly, neither here nor elsewhere.
>
> In closing, I ask again that the other Tribunes block this
> Intercession and be more proactive in the future.
>
> ============ ========= ========= ========= ==
> In amicitia et fides -
> Publius Ullerius Stephanus Venator
> Civis circa Quintilis MMDCCLI a.u.c.
> Senator et Lictor
>
> Religio Septentrionalis - Poeta
> ------------ --------- --------- ---
> May the Holy Powers smile on our efforts.
> May the Spirits of our family lines nod in approval.
> May we be of Worth to our fellow Nova Romans.
>

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66494 From: Maior Date: 2009-06-08
Subject: ad. VI id. Iun. DIes Natalis , foundation day, of the temple to Men
M. Hortensia Maior Quiritibus spd;

Mens usually called Mens Bona is a Roman goddess. Her temple was on
the Capitoline in Rome and June 8th the dies natalis, celebrated.

for the Romans a concept could be so great that it could only come
from a god. They might not know the name of the god so the concept
itself became the god's name.

Mens is an attribute, without which the Roman people and the state
could not prosper: call it practical wisdom and prudence in
government and affairs. The military disaster of Trasimene resulted
in the Libri Sibyllini being consulted. The result was a temple to
Mens, vowed by the praetor T. Otacilius Crassus in 217 B.C.E. It was
built on the Capitoline. The foundation day, dies natalis, is June
8th.

From coinage and finds in Paestum, the cult statue was that of a
seated women reading a scroll in her lap.

Robert Schilling in his excellent study on the cults of Venus,
discusses the 2 vowed temples; one to Venus Eryx and the other to
Mens, they were separated only by a drainage ditch. He contends that
Dea Mens really is an aspect of Venus, and this has been accepted by
scholars.

So Quirites; let us honour dea Mens today, to receive wisdom and
prudence, these Roman virtues that come from the goddess!
bene valete in Mente Bona!
Marca Hortensia Maior
sacerdos Mentis
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66495 From: Maior Date: 2009-06-08
Subject: Re: Intercessio:
Salve Aureliane;
you know I hold you in great respect. We can and always will have a thoughtful fair discusssion, because we both love Nova Roma and the gods.

In this case it is historical fact, not my opinion at all, please refer to Livy, the Struggle for the Orders, the objection of the tribunes during the contio preceding the vote to the Lex Ogulnia.

Your conscience and I absolutely respect it; doesn't apply as tribune.[let's both ask Cordus] Romans revered the Mos, the ways of their ancestors. Why not have both of us write to A. Apollonius Cordus, who is so knowledgabe on Roman history and Roman law, and impartial and devoted to Rome, romanitas and the mos and discuss it with us both.


But whatever occurs, I know you act with Fides, and I respect you and your actions.
bene vale in sapientam deorum
Marca Hortensia Maior
> Aureliane Maior sal.
>
> You are entitled to your opinion of the duties of the Tribuni and I certainly respect that right considering your past service to the Res Publica.  However, since our opinions do not agree and I am currently a sitting Tribunus, you must allow me to act as my conscience and interpretation of the Constitution and leges dictate.  I would like to point out that I have not yet either agreed or disagreed with the current intercessio of my colleague Agrippa.
>
> Vale.
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Maior <rory12001@...>
> To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Mon, 8 Jun 2009 1:55 pm
> Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Intercessio:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> M. Hortensia Fl. Galerio L. Coruncanioque spd;
> Let us take a moment to look back to Rome to see what it is we are talking about: the tribunes of the plebs.
>
> The tribunes of the plebs, historically, came into existance to protect the rights of the plebeians. That was their function and that was why their person was sacrosanct.
>
> Our tribunes are here to protect the rights of the people, an election is the ultimate will of the people.
>
> The people did not object to Modianus' candidacy during the legal time: the contio, thereby giving their approval. The people interpreted the law! The people decided Modianus was the one they wanted as censor; so they voted for him. The people made their will known.
>
> So let us understand the the point of the tribunes in Nova Roma is to respect and enforce the people's rights, that is the meaning of their
> power.
>
> As I pointed out, a tribune of the plebs never in the entire history of Rome vetoed an election, never interfered in an election.
>
> All you will find in Roman history is that the tribunes would issue vetos during the contio, a pratice we have maintained.
>
> Let us follow our mos, our values our beliefs. Republican Rome is our model, the gods of Rome our gods. The people of Nova Roma the masters.
> bene valete in sapientam Mentis
> Marca Hortensia Maior
> sacerdos Mentis
>
> >
> > Fl. Galerius Aurelianus Tribunus Plebis L. Coruncanio Cato. sal.
> >
> > Your message comes dangerously close to violating certain sections of the Consitution and the lex Dida Genima de potestate tribunicia could be applied.  I recommend that you withdraw the statement and rephrase it with terms such as "in your opinion."  If you continue to interfere with the official action of a Tribunus Plebis, I will bring the weight of the Summa Coercendi Potestas against you.  The same applies to any other citizen who interferes with the official action of a Tribunus Plebis.
> >
> > Vale.
> >
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Lucius Coruncanius Cato <l.coruncanius_cato@>
> > To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> > Sent: Mon, 8 Jun 2009 4:56 am
> > Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Intercessio
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > L. Coruncanius Cato omn. spd,
> >
> > I am with you, Venator, in this statement. Time for vetoing the candidacy ended with the contio. Now it is time to move
> forward. This intercesio is not only unlawful, as it comes long past the 72h period, but a very dangerous movement, as it is a long step backwards and sets up a precedent for those who doesn't like the results of an election. One might not like the results, but trying to overturn them by veto is really antidemocratic, and those gestures are only seen in places where the voice of citizens or members means less than wet paper.
> >
> > I also agree with the needing of rewriting some of the laws involved in this election, to make them pristine clear, with words stating what they intend
> > to mean, and permitting no interpretation. I sent a proposal to the Law Review commitee on those leges, which has been ignored by most of those who complain about the meaning and interpretation of those laws.
> >
> > This shows, to me, that these actions and wills from those persons are not for the better of NR, but an intent to bring down all what has been accomplished for the last 11 years. I know coexistence is hard sometimes, but we have to carry on with it. And Venator shows this spirit by not resigning when he does not like something, and by the will to be part of the solution, and not of the problem.
> >
> > I too ask for the tribunes to block this intercessio, even when it is not legal and should not be placed, and I humbly ask you, tribune Agrippa, to think about what you are doing, why yo do it, and what are the effects.
> >
> > Di vos incolumem custodiant.
> >
> > --
> > L.
> Coruncanius Cato
> > Aedilis Curulis
> > Scriba Consulis Hispaniae
> >
> > --- El dom, 7/6/09, Publius Ullerius Stephanus Venator <famila.ulleria.venii@> escribió:
> >
> >
> > De: Publius Ullerius Stephanus Venator <famila.ulleria.venii@>
> > Asunto: Re: [Nova-Roma] Intercessio
> > Para: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> > Fecha: domingo, 7 junio, 2009 7:11
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Avete Omnes;
> >
> > I ask the other tribunes, as a long time Cives Nova Roma, to help
> > things move along by opposing this Intercession.
> >
> > I was a voice, albeit a fairly quiet one, in opposition to the
> > candidacy of Modianus for Censor.
> >
> > I still believe the Law under which his candidacy was touted as legal=0
> > Aand opposed as illegal is poorly written and too open to
> > interpretation. Our Laws need clarity, brevity and simplicity. Law
> > must not only be for the lawyers, it must be primarily for the
> > understanding by and protection of the People.
> >
> > We must needs not try and cover every situation; having macronational
> > law, statute and regulation, which supersedes what we do here.
> >
> > However, the Vox Populi has been heard, and is that not the true
> > foundation of any Res Publica? If the People do not contest the
> > legitimacy of a Law, it stands.
> >
> > The majority of the People, by their resounding silence, also lent
> > tacit approval to the candidacy of Modianus. This intercession is, in
> > my opinion, an ex post facto attempt at what should have been resolved
> > during the discussion before the Cista op
> ened.
> >
> > By the vote count and tally, Modianus has the confidence of a majority
> > of the members of the Centuries.
> >
> > Yes, this note has an air of resignation about it; what's done is
> > done, que sera, sera.
> >
> > There are problems, which need to be addressed, and I will try better
> > to be a part of the solution. I am not considering leaving, neither
> > the Senate, the Lictorship nor Nova Roma, though I will step back from
> > committee and scribal appointments to ponder things. (...and, yes, I
> > realize I'd already been a bit withdrawn in those arenas already.) I
> > need time to think.
> >
> > To my friends herein, I know this is unexpected, but did you really
> > see something different coming, in light of my nature?
> >
> > I have made no enemies in Nova20Roma, though there are a few who I find
> > useless to the future of our endeavor. I shall no longer respond to
> > them, neither directly nor indirectly, neither here nor elsewhere.
> >
> > In closing, I ask again that the other Tribunes block this
> > Intercession and be more proactive in the future.
> >
> > ============ ========= ========= ========= ==
> > In amicitia et fides -
> > Publius Ullerius Stephanus Venator
> > Civis circa Quintilis MMDCCLI a.u.c.
> > Senator et Lictor
> >
> > Religio Septentrionalis - Poeta
> > ------------ --------- --------- ---
> > May the Holy Powers smile on our efforts.
> > May the Spirits of our family lines nod in approval.
> > May we be of
> Worth to our fellow Nova Romans.
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66496 From: Jesse Corradino Date: 2009-06-08
Subject: Re: Following in my Pater's footsteps
Is the irony of your response at all apparent to you?
 

To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
From: PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@...
Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2009 13:22:36 -0400
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Following in my Pater's footsteps



Diana,

I am going to write to you the same way I wrote to Marcus Octavius.  Do not let a temper tantrum make you quit NR.  If you change your mind later, as you have done in the past, I will do everything possible to prevent your return to Nova Roma.  The time for our founders and early citizens to act all outraged over what happened to the organization when you went away is past.  You can stay and try to fix this mess we are in or you can quit.  I would consider it a great personal loss if you do.  Please reconsider.

Fl. Galerius Aurelianus


-----Original Message-----
From: Diana Octavia Aventina <roman.babe@...>
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Sun, 7 Jun 2009 3:18 pm
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Following in my Pater's footsteps



Salvete all,

Following the footsteps of my Paterfamilias, Marcus Octavius, I hereby
renouce my citizenship in Nova Roma. He was my favorite person in NR for the
last 10 years and now he is gone too. This is the straw that has broken the
camels back.
I first found this mailing list in May of 1999 and we had fun then and a
goal. Now the only goal is to argue about who will have control of a group
that only argues. We are a joke amongst other Roman groups and yet the
people here keep arguing, now more than ever since Sulla is back. I want no
part of it anymore.

Sulla, I wish that you never come back. Send me all the hate mail that you
want, and call me a back stabber because I don't give a crap what you say. I
was never a freind of yours anyway. Our Vesta was right when she said that
you were a cancer. You and Poplicola and a few others are intent on killing
NR and you are doing a good job of it.

Vale,
Joanne Agate
formerly Diana Octavia Aventina





Windows Liveâ„¢: Keep your life in sync. Check it out.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66497 From: Maior Date: 2009-06-08
Subject: Re: Ad VI Id. Iun. Sacrifice to Mens Bona
:
>
> SACRIFICIUM MENTI ante diem SEXTUM IDIBUS IUNIIS
>
>
> Favete linguis!
>
> (Beginning of the sacrifice.)
>
> PRAEFATIO
>
> Mens Bona Populi Novi Romani Quiritium,
> te hoc ture commovendo
> bonas preces precor,
> uti sies volens propitia
> Populo Novo Romano Quiritibus,
> Reique Publicae Populi Novi Romani Quiritium,
> mihi, domo, familiae!
>
> (Incense is placed in the focus of the altar.)
>
>
> Mens Bona Populi Novi Romani Quiritium,
> uti te ture commovendo
> bonas preces precatus sum,
> eiusdem rei ergo
> macte vino inferio esto!"
>
> (Libation of wine is made.)
>
>
> PRECATIO
>
> Mens Bona Populi Novi Romani Quiritium,
> huic diei natalis
> te precor quaesoque:
> uti sapientam mensam bonam
> societati Novae Romae tribuas;
> utique Rem Publicam Populi Novi Romani Quiritium
> confirmes, augeas, adiuves,
> omnibusque mentibus malis liberes;
> utique Res Publica Populi Novi Romani Quiritium semper floreat,
> atque hoc anno anniversario undecimo Novae Romae conditae
> convalescat,
> atque pax et concordia, salus et mens bona Novae Romae omni tempore
> crescat,
> et futura clarissima ac beatissima et gloriosissima Nova Roma habeat;
> utique Populo Novo Romano Quiritibus,
> Reique Publicae Populi Novi Romani Quiritium,
> mihi, domo, familiae
> omnes in hoc anno undecimo Novae Romae eventus bonos faustosque esse
> siris;
> utique sies volens propitia Populo Novo Romano Quiritibus,
> Reique Publicae Populi Novi Romani Quiritium,
> magistratibus, consulibus, praetoribus Populi Novi Romani
> Quiritium,
> tribunis Plebis Novae Romanae,
> Senatui Novo Romano,
> omnibus civibus, viris et mulieribus, pueris et puellabus Novis
> Romanis,
>
> mihi, domo, familiae!
>
> SACRIFICIUM
>
> Sicut verba nuncupavi,
> quaeque ita faxis, uti ego me sentio dicere:
> harum rerum ergo macte
> hoc vino libando,
> hoc ture ommovendo
> esto fito volens propitia
> hoc anno anniversario undecimo Novae Romae conditae,
> huic diei natalis Menti templi
> Populo Novo Romano Quiritibus,
> Reique Publicae Populi Novi Romani Quiritium,
> magistratibus, consulibus, praetoribus Populi Novi Romani
> Quiritium,
> tribunis Plebis Novae Romanae,
> Senatui Novo Romano,
> omnibus civibus, viris et mulierbus, pueris et puellabus Novis
> Romanis,
>
> mihi, domo, familiae!
>
>
> (Libation is made and incense is sacrificed.)
>
>
> REDDITIO
>
> Mens Populi Novi Romani Quiritium,
>
> uti te ture commovendo
> et vino libando
> bonas preces precatus sum,
> earundem rerum ergo
> macte vino inferio esto!
>
>
> (Libation of wine is made)
>
>
>
> Ilicet!
>
> (End of the sacrifice.)
>
>
> PIACULUM
>
> Iane,
> Mens Bona Populi Novi Romani Quiritium,
> Iuppiter Optime Maxmime, Iuno, Minerva,
> Omnes Di Immortales quocumque nomine:
> si quidquam vobis in hac caerimonia displicet,
> hoc vino inferio
> veniam peto
> et vitium meum expio.
>
> (Libation of wine is made.)
>
>
>
>
> Valete in Mente!
> May Mens be with us!
>
> Marca Hortensia Maior
> sacerdos Mentis
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66498 From: PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@aol.com Date: 2009-06-08
Subject: Re: Following in my Pater's footsteps
I was wondering if anyone would catch the irony in my posts.  I was aware of it as I was writing it but I still felt it necessary to go ahead since I am getting a little tired of all the resignations in protest rather than staying in NR to protest in order to fix the problems.  Irony, sarcasm, exasperation, resignation, regret . . . all part of the emotional ride in Nova Roma.

Aureliane


-----Original Message-----
From: Jesse Corradino <woden66@...>
To: nova-roma@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Mon, 8 Jun 2009 2:46 pm
Subject: RE: [Nova-Roma] Following in my Pater's footsteps



Is the irony of your response at all apparent to you?
 

To: Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com
From: PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@ aol.com
Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2009 13:22:36 -0400
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Following in my Pater's footsteps



Diana,

I am going to write to you the same way I wrote to Marcus Octavius.  Do not let a temper tantrum make you quit NR.  If you change your mind later, as you have done in the past, I will do everything possible to prevent your return to Nova Roma.  The time for our founders20and early citizens to act all outraged over what happened to the organization when you went away is past.  You can stay and try to fix this mess we are in or you can quit.  I would consider it a great personal loss if you do.  Please reconsider.

Fl. Galerius Aurelianus


-----Original Message-----
From: Diana Octavia Aventina <roman.babe@yahoo. com>
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com
Sent: Sun, 7 Jun 2009 3:18 pm
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Following in my Pater's footsteps



Salvete all,

Following the footsteps of my Paterfamilias, Marcus Octavius, I hereby
renouce my citizenship in Nova Roma. He was my favorite person in NR for the
last 10 years and now he is gone too. This is the straw that has broken the
camels back.
I first found this mailing list in May of 1999 and we had fun then and a
goal. Now the only goal is to argue about who will have control of a group
that only argues. We are a joke amongst other Roman groups and yet the
people here keep arguing, now more than ever since Sulla is back. I want no
part of it anymore.

Sulla, I wish that you never come back. Send me all the hate mail that you
want, and call me a back stabber because I don't give a crap what you say. I
was never a freind of yours anyway . Our Vesta was right when she said that
you were a cancer. You and Poplicola and a few others are intent on killing
NR and you are doing a good job of it.

Vale,
Joanne Agate
formerly Diana Octavia Aventina





Windows Liveâ„¢: Keep your life in sync. Check it out.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66499 From: D.O.A. Date: 2009-06-08
Subject: Re: Following in my Pater's footsteps
Salve Uncle,
Thanks for your email. It's nice to know you care. :-)

<If you change your mind later, as you have done in the past, I will do
everything possible to prevent your return to Nova Roma.?

Actually, I have never resigned and then changed my mind. I have never quit
anything in NR and then changed my mind. I'm just tired of the fighting and
am bowing out of it.

<You can stay and try to fix this mess we are in or you can quit.?
No one wants me to stay and help fix this mess, considering the negative
reaction to me being appointed Senator. That was embarrassing.

Vale,
Diana
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66500 From: QFabiusMaxmi@aol.com Date: 2009-06-08
Subject: Re: Intercessio
In a message dated 6/8/2009 3:32:24 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time, l.coruncanius_cato@... writes:
Of course! Now the issue is that "the important centuries were occupied by government friends". Sorry sir, but this is NOT the issue here.
The issue is you do not accept the results of an election. The issue is you ignored a proposal on the Law Review Comitee to rewrite this vague and open to interpretation law, stating that "the writer of the law was to mean that" ...
Of course.  I wish the government would stop saying the "people" when they mean "the government"
 
And per usual you miss the point.  The rule author is still alive and communicated his intention, which you disregarded since it was what not what you wanted to hear.   In the military history simulation biz we have a term for that.  Its called "cheaters..."
 
Q. Fabius Maximus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66501 From: Kirsteen Wright Date: 2009-06-08
Subject: Re: Following in my Pater's footsteps
On 6/8/09, D.O.A. <roman.babe@...> wrote:

No one wants me to stay and help fix this mess,

Don't ever think that. I remember voting for you years ago. I've emailed you privately for advice when I had decisions to make regarding the Religio and was very grateful for the advice you gave me. I, for one, really wish you would stay and genuinely believe you have a lot to offer Nova Roma and have the integrity and intelligence to be ideal to help fix this mess. I really wish you would reconsider.

Flavia Lucilla Merula


Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66502 From: Publius Ullerius Stephanus Venator Date: 2009-06-08
Subject: Re: Diribitoris Suffecti
Ave honored Consul;

Glad to have been of service, and pleased with the company I had.

=====================================
In amicitia et fide
Publius Ullerius Stephanus Venator
Civis circa Quintilis MMDCCLI a.u.c.
Diribitor Suffectus Emeritus, et alia =)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66503 From: Publius Ullerius Stephanus Venator Date: 2009-06-08
Subject: Another little brag. . .
Avete Omnes;

There is a dish I like to make, which I learnt from my Nonnie
D'Orazio: Bracciola, or Rolled Beef Steak with Filling.

My recipe card went missing, so I did a Google search. My article at
the Nova Roma website on this delight was #3 out of 2070 hits.

Woohoo!

Methink this means that recipes are a good way to generate traffic for
Nova Roma.

I'll work up more Nova Roman foodstuffs =)

=====================================
In amicitia et fide
Publius Ullerius Stephanus Venator
Civis circa Quintilis MMDCCLI a.u.c.
Religio Septentrionalis - Poeta

Dominus Sodalitas Coquuorum et Cerevisiae Coctorum
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Sodalis_Coq_et_Coq/

(sites subject to sporadic updates)
http://www.myspace.com/venator_poetus
http://anheathenreader.blogspot.com/
http://www.catamount-grange-hearth.org/
http://www.cafepress.com/catamountgrange
--
May the Holy Powers smile on our efforts.
May the Spirits of our family lines nod in approval.
May we be of Worth to our fellow Nova Romans.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66504 From: L Julia Aquila Date: 2009-06-08
Subject: Re: Another little brag. . .
Salve Venator!!!!!

Bracciole always simmered in a huge pot of sauce at holiday time. I made it myself a time or two, without a recipe card and the main thing I remembered is to tenderize the thin slices of steak before filling them. Mine were never good as my Mother's and my Nonny's so I would love to see your recipe!
Thank you for this!
And congratulations on your hits, you are about to get another one!

Now do you have a recipe for the small veal spedini, the little rolled veal scallopini's on the skewer seperated by bay leaves and grilled or broiled? If you do i will start saving now so I can make some;)

Vale,
Julia


--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Publius Ullerius Stephanus Venator <famila.ulleria.venii@...> wrote:
>
> Avete Omnes;
>
> There is a dish I like to make, which I learnt from my Nonnie
> D'Orazio: Bracciola, or Rolled Beef Steak with Filling.
>
> My recipe card went missing, so I did a Google search. My article at
> the Nova Roma website on this delight was #3 out of 2070 hits.
>
> Woohoo!
>
> Methink this means that recipes are a good way to generate traffic for
> Nova Roma.
>
> I'll work up more Nova Roman foodstuffs =)
>
> =====================================
> In amicitia et fide
> Publius Ullerius Stephanus Venator
> Civis circa Quintilis MMDCCLI a.u.c.
> Religio Septentrionalis - Poeta
>
> Dominus Sodalitas Coquuorum et Cerevisiae Coctorum
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Sodalis_Coq_et_Coq/
>
> (sites subject to sporadic updates)
> http://www.myspace.com/venator_poetus
> http://anheathenreader.blogspot.com/
> http://www.catamount-grange-hearth.org/
> http://www.cafepress.com/catamountgrange
> --
> May the Holy Powers smile on our efforts.
> May the Spirits of our family lines nod in approval.
> May we be of Worth to our fellow Nova Romans.
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66505 From: Maior Date: 2009-06-08
Subject: Re: Another little brag. . .
Salvete Venator Juliaque;
ecastor I'm hungry, I had no nonna and instead got chicken soup a poor second in my opinion to Italian cuisine;-) So thank you for sharing and I'd love more recipes from our cives. Food definitely is something we should be discussing in the forum!
bene vale
Maior

here is the link to the NRwiki! add more recipes omnes:)
http://www.novaroma.org/nr/Bracciola
>
> Salve Venator!!!!!
>
> Bracciole always simmered in a huge pot of sauce at holiday time. I made it myself a time or two, without a recipe card and the main thing I remembered is to tenderize the thin slices of steak before filling them. Mine were never good as my Mother's and my Nonny's so I would love to see your recipe!
> Thank you for this!
> And congratulations on your hits, you are about to get another one!
>
> Now do you have a recipe for the small veal spedini, the little rolled veal scallopini's on the skewer seperated by bay leaves and grilled or broiled? If you do i will start saving now so I can make some;)
>
> Vale,
> Julia
>
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Publius Ullerius Stephanus Venator <famila.ulleria.venii@> wrote:
> >
> > Avete Omnes;
> >
> > There is a dish I like to make, which I learnt from my Nonnie
> > D'Orazio: Bracciola, or Rolled Beef Steak with Filling.
> >
> > My recipe card went missing, so I did a Google search. My article at
> > the Nova Roma website on this delight was #3 out of 2070 hits.
> >
> > Woohoo!
> >
> > Methink this means that recipes are a good way to generate traffic for
> > Nova Roma.
> >
> > I'll work up more Nova Roman foodstuffs =)
> >
> > =====================================
> > In amicitia et fide
> > Publius Ullerius Stephanus Venator
> > Civis circa Quintilis MMDCCLI a.u.c.
> > Religio Septentrionalis - Poeta
> >
> > Dominus Sodalitas Coquuorum et Cerevisiae Coctorum
> > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Sodalis_Coq_et_Coq/
> >
> > (sites subject to sporadic updates)
> > http://www.myspace.com/venator_poetus
> > http://anheathenreader.blogspot.com/
> > http://www.catamount-grange-hearth.org/
> > http://www.cafepress.com/catamountgrange
> > --
> > May the Holy Powers smile on our efforts.
> > May the Spirits of our family lines nod in approval.
> > May we be of Worth to our fellow Nova Romans.
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66506 From: James Hooper Date: 2009-06-08
Subject: Re: Intercessio
Salve,
Sorry, but I was out of town and could not connect with my internet
service when this intersessio was called for. I have not read all the
paerticulars and will not decide without doing so. I ask that I be noted as
abstaining at this time.
Vale,
Gaius Pompeius Marcellus, Tribune of Plebs
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66507 From: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com Date: 2009-06-08
Subject: Posting rules in this Forum, 6/8/2009, 11:45 pm
Reminder from:   Nova-Roma Yahoo! Group
 
Title:   Posting rules in this Forum
 
Date:   Monday June 8, 2009
Time:   11:45 pm - 12:00 am
Repeats:   This event repeats every week until Friday January 1, 2010.
Location:   Rome
Notes:   Praetores omnibus s.d.

Please keep on mind the posting rules defined in the current Edictum de sermone Apr. 24, 2762 GEM-PMA, that you find in the Files section of this Forum, at:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma/files/Edicta%20de%20sermone/

Valete omnes,


Praetores G.E.Marinus and P.M.Albucius
 
Copyright © 2009  Yahoo! Inc. All Rights Reserved | Terms of Service | Privacy Policy
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66508 From: Publius Ullerius Stephanus Venator Date: 2009-06-08
Subject: Re: Another little brag. . .
Ave Maior;

On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 6:06 PM, Maior<rory12001@...> wrote:
>
> Salvete Venator Juliaque;
> ecastor I'm hungry, I had no nonna and instead got chicken soup a poor
> second in my opinion to Italian cuisine;-) So thank you for sharing and I'd
> love more recipes from our cives. Food definitely is something we should be
> discussing in the forum!
> bene vale
> Maior
>
> here is the link to the NRwiki! add more recipes omnes:)
> http://www.novaroma.org/nr/Bracciola
>

I think if you and I can keep discussions to matters of plate and cup,
we might just have common ground after all ,-)

Just for you then, Nonnie D'Orazio's Zuppa Jennie (named after her
mother, Giovannia Mastroianni, nee Riciardelli), know elsewhere as
Italian Wedding Soup. . .a term I had not heard until after I'd moved
to Illinois in 1996, 39 years after I'd been born .-)

Foodstuffs: 4 qt home made chicken stock, 1# ea ground chicken and
veal, 1/2 c dried bread - finely grated, 2 lg chicken eggs - beaten, 1
t ea dried oregano, basil and parsley - rubbed to small particles, 6
cloves garlic - crushed, 1 t ea salt and fresh-ground black pepper, 2
c long grain rice, 2 c ea spinach, escarole, endive and leek - coarse
chopped and a bowl of freshly shredded Asiago d'allevo or
Parmigiano-Reggiano for garnishing

Method: While bringing the stock to a boil, mix well the ground
meats, bread crumbs, eggs, herbs, garlic, salt and pepper. Shape mix
into small balls, about the size of chestnuts. Drop a few at a time
into the boiling stock, so as to not reduce the temperature; cook
about 10 minutes. Stir in the rice and cook an additional 15 minutes.
Stir in the greens and cook 15 more minutes.

Serve in a wide, shallow soup bowl with a libel sprinkling of cheese.

Side dishes, if this is the main course; fresh baked bread with butter
and a mix of string beans and summer squash - steamed and dressed with
balsamic vinegar mixed with a bit of brown mustard.

Vale - Venator
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66509 From: livia_plauta Date: 2009-06-08
Subject: Re: Another little brag. . .
Salve Venator,
I'm not intervening on recipes, but I couldn't help going to the Wiki page and correcting "Bracciola" to "Braciola".
Blame it on the 15 years spent teaching Italian, but I just can't stand spelling mistakes.

Vale,
Livia
>
> Ave Maior;
>
> On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 6:06 PM, Maior<rory12001@...> wrote:
> >
> > Salvete Venator Juliaque;
> > ecastor I'm hungry, I had no nonna and instead got chicken soup a poor
> > second in my opinion to Italian cuisine;-) So thank you for sharing and I'd
> > love more recipes from our cives. Food definitely is something we should be
> > discussing in the forum!
> > bene vale
> > Maior
> >
> > here is the link to the NRwiki! add more recipes omnes:)
> > http://www.novaroma.org/nr/Bracciola
> >
>
> I think if you and I can keep discussions to matters of plate and cup,
> we might just have common ground after all ,-)
>
> Just for you then, Nonnie D'Orazio's Zuppa Jennie (named after her
> mother, Giovannia Mastroianni, nee Riciardelli), know elsewhere as
> Italian Wedding Soup. . .a term I had not heard until after I'd moved
> to Illinois in 1996, 39 years after I'd been born .-)
>
> Foodstuffs: 4 qt home made chicken stock, 1# ea ground chicken and
> veal, 1/2 c dried bread - finely grated, 2 lg chicken eggs - beaten, 1
> t ea dried oregano, basil and parsley - rubbed to small particles, 6
> cloves garlic - crushed, 1 t ea salt and fresh-ground black pepper, 2
> c long grain rice, 2 c ea spinach, escarole, endive and leek - coarse
> chopped and a bowl of freshly shredded Asiago d'allevo or
> Parmigiano-Reggiano for garnishing
>
> Method: While bringing the stock to a boil, mix well the ground
> meats, bread crumbs, eggs, herbs, garlic, salt and pepper. Shape mix
> into small balls, about the size of chestnuts. Drop a few at a time
> into the boiling stock, so as to not reduce the temperature; cook
> about 10 minutes. Stir in the rice and cook an additional 15 minutes.
> Stir in the greens and cook 15 more minutes.
>
> Serve in a wide, shallow soup bowl with a libel sprinkling of cheese.
>
> Side dishes, if this is the main course; fresh baked bread with butter
> and a mix of string beans and summer squash - steamed and dressed with
> balsamic vinegar mixed with a bit of brown mustard.
>
> Vale - Venator
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66510 From: livia_plauta Date: 2009-06-08
Subject: Re: Another little brag. . .
Oh, and now I'm deperate, because I realized the "Roman cooking" category has other spelling mistakes, and I can't figure out how to fix them.

>
> Salve Venator,
> I'm not intervening on recipes, but I couldn't help going to the Wiki page and correcting "Bracciola" to "Braciola".
> Blame it on the 15 years spent teaching Italian, but I just can't stand spelling mistakes.
>
> Vale,
> Livia
> >
> > Ave Maior;
> >
> > On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 6:06 PM, Maior<rory12001@> wrote:
> > >
> > > Salvete Venator Juliaque;
> > > ecastor I'm hungry, I had no nonna and instead got chicken soup a poor
> > > second in my opinion to Italian cuisine;-) So thank you for sharing and I'd
> > > love more recipes from our cives. Food definitely is something we should be
> > > discussing in the forum!
> > > bene vale
> > > Maior
> > >
> > > here is the link to the NRwiki! add more recipes omnes:)
> > > http://www.novaroma.org/nr/Bracciola
> > >
> >
> > I think if you and I can keep discussions to matters of plate and cup,
> > we might just have common ground after all ,-)
> >
> > Just for you then, Nonnie D'Orazio's Zuppa Jennie (named after her
> > mother, Giovannia Mastroianni, nee Riciardelli), know elsewhere as
> > Italian Wedding Soup. . .a term I had not heard until after I'd moved
> > to Illinois in 1996, 39 years after I'd been born .-)
> >
> > Foodstuffs: 4 qt home made chicken stock, 1# ea ground chicken and
> > veal, 1/2 c dried bread - finely grated, 2 lg chicken eggs - beaten, 1
> > t ea dried oregano, basil and parsley - rubbed to small particles, 6
> > cloves garlic - crushed, 1 t ea salt and fresh-ground black pepper, 2
> > c long grain rice, 2 c ea spinach, escarole, endive and leek - coarse
> > chopped and a bowl of freshly shredded Asiago d'allevo or
> > Parmigiano-Reggiano for garnishing
> >
> > Method: While bringing the stock to a boil, mix well the ground
> > meats, bread crumbs, eggs, herbs, garlic, salt and pepper. Shape mix
> > into small balls, about the size of chestnuts. Drop a few at a time
> > into the boiling stock, so as to not reduce the temperature; cook
> > about 10 minutes. Stir in the rice and cook an additional 15 minutes.
> > Stir in the greens and cook 15 more minutes.
> >
> > Serve in a wide, shallow soup bowl with a libel sprinkling of cheese.
> >
> > Side dishes, if this is the main course; fresh baked bread with butter
> > and a mix of string beans and summer squash - steamed and dressed with
> > balsamic vinegar mixed with a bit of brown mustard.
> >
> > Vale - Venator
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66511 From: Publius Ullerius Stephanus Venator Date: 2009-06-08
Subject: Hearty Chicken Soup
Avete omnes;

One of our Cives bemoaned the fact that she had to "do" with chicken soup.

This need not be so; chicken soup is not only good for the soul, but
also the body =)

Foodstuffs to make stock: 4 # chicken parts (backs, necks, wingtips,
trimmings. . .) or a 4# fryer - fully dismembered - lightly roasted
for 45 minute in an open pan (seasoned with a light sprinkling of sage
and black pepper), including drippings, 4 med yellow onions - coarse
chopped, 8 lg cloves garlic - halved, 4 stalks celery - coarse chopped
(onion, garlic and celery roasted with the chicken for 20 minutes), 1
T rubbed sage, 8 Bay laurel leaves and 1/4 c whole peppercorns (Mix
Royale: black, green and white) in a mulling spice bag, water
sufficient for the task. . .

Method: put all the solids and pan drippings into a large stockpot
and add in enough water to cover them, plus 2 inches. Bring to a boil
and simmer for at least 3 hours on low-med heat. Turn on low and
retrieve chicken pieces with a slotted spoon. Discard bone, skin and
gristle; return diced meat to stock, make up volume to 4 quarts with
boiling water, continue simmering on low. Remove the Bay leaves and
peppercorns after 1 more hour.

If you would like this to be a lower fat meal, prepare the stock at
least a day in advance. Refrigerate it and before reheating, spoon
off the chicken fat layer from the top of the congealed stock.

Foodstuff for Noodles: 4 c all-purpose flour, 1/2 t salt, 1/2 teaspoon
baking powder, yolks of 8 lg eggs - beaten (whites can be made into
meringue for topping a chocolate pie ,-), water and extra flour as
needed. . .

Method: mix the dry ingredients well and slowly cut in the eggs with
a pastry knife. Add a little water if the noodle dough is too stiff.
Add a little flour if it is to wet. Roll out on a floured board to a
little thicker than a hard bound book cover, let set about 20 minutes.
Cut into strips of about a finger's width and about a handspan long.
Dry for about an hour before cooking.

Drop the noodles one-by-one into 4 qt boiling stock, cook at least 15
minute or until the noodles are done to taste.

To further enhance this soup add in 2 c shredded carrots, 1 c finely
chopped parsnips and 1 c thinly sliced tan mushrooms 15 minutes before
the noodles.

A few tablespoons of Worcestershire sauce is nice, too.

=====================================
In amicitia et fide
Publius Ullerius Stephanus Venator
Civis circa Quintilis MMDCCLI a.u.c.
Coquuor et Cerevisiae Coctor
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66512 From: Publius Ullerius Stephanus Venator Date: 2009-06-08
Subject: Re: Another little brag. . .
Ave Livia;

On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 7:25 PM, livia_plauta wrote:
>
> Salve Venator,
> I'm not intervening on recipes, but I couldn't help going to the Wiki page
> and correcting "Bracciola" to "Braciola".
> Blame it on the 15 years spent teaching Italian, but I just can't stand
> spelling mistakes.
>
> Vale,
> Livia
>

Null problem; I usually don't have an issue with being shown proper words ,-)

Nonnie had a US high school education, but little to none in Italian.
Papa D'Orazio had a 5th grade education in Italy (his last 2 years
being under the beginning of Fascist rule in Italia), and just a few
night classes in America. One of his regrets is not letting us learn
at least some Italian, mainly because he's lost most of his. He
hasn't really had anyone to talk to in Italian for almost 30 years
now.

So, I'm grateful when someone can show me the proper Italian, versus
my grandparents' self-admitted "peasant Italian. ,-)

gratias tibi ago - Venator
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66513 From: Publius Ullerius Stephanus Venator Date: 2009-06-08
Subject: Re: Another little brag. . .
Livia;

Follow the words of that great American philosopher, Charlie Papazian:
Relax, don't worry, have a home brew.

Language is, as are people, a living thing that does change over time.

Venii
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66514 From: Robert Levee Date: 2009-06-08
Subject: Intercessio!
Salve et salvete,

"I, Appius Galerius Aurelianus, tribune of the Plebs,

In application of the paragraph IV.A.7b.of the Constitution of Nova Roma,

Considering the Constitution of Nova Roma and of the laws which applies it and
define the powers of the tribunes of the Plebs, especially in case of an intercessio,

Considering the message nb 66421 issued in the Forum last Jun 7, 2009 4:32 pm by which
Tribune G. Vipsanius Agrippa has pronounced "intercessio against the custodes Marcus Lucretius Agricola and
Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus in certifying the election of Caeso Fabius Buteo
Modianus as censor and against the consuls Marcus Iulius Severus and Marcus
Cornelius Complutensis in accepting the election results",

Considering that this intercessio violates the Constitution, and especially its
article II, B, 3,

Hereby veto the intercession thrown by Tribune G. Vipsanius Agrippa last Jun 7, 2009 4:32 pm."

I have quoted the article II, B, 3 of the constitution. There may be other arguments, but this one (the right of Novaromans to take part in elections) is one of the good grounds here, for a tribune should never be eager to make his own voice prevailing on the People's one.

Vale et valete,
Ap.Galerius Aurelianus
Tribune of the Plebs
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66515 From: Steve Moore Date: 2009-06-08
Subject: Best Wishes on the Vestalia

M. Valerius Potitus Maxima Valeria Messallina SPD.

 

On the occasion of the Vestalia, I want to extend best wishes to my honored cousin, the Chief Vestal of Nova Roma. May Vesta, Custos Flammae, bless you in your endeavors to restore her worship.

 

Vale,

Potitus

 

I offer the following from Ovid’s “Fasti”, Book VI. Vesta Mater, fave me.

 

Vesta, favour me! I’ll open my lips now in your service,

     If I’m indeed allowed to attend your sacred rites.

I was rapt in prayer: I felt the heavenly deity,

     And the happy earth shone with radiant light.

Not that I saw you, goddess (away with poets’ lies!)

     Nor were you to be looked on by any man:

But I knew what I’d not known, and the errors

     I’d held to were corrected without instruction.

They say Rome had celebrated the Parilia forty times,

     When the goddess, the Guardian of the Flame, was received

In her shrine, the work of Numa, that peace-loving king,

     (None more god-fearing was ever born in Sabine lands.)

The roofs you see of bronze were roofs of straw then,

     And its walls were made of wickerwork.

This meagre spot that supports the Hall of Vesta

     Was then the mighty palace of unshorn Numa.

Yet the form of the temple, that remains, they say,

     Is as before, and is shaped so for good reason.

Vesta’s identified with Earth: in them both’s unsleeping fire:

     Earth and the hearth are both symbols of home.

The Earth’s a ball not resting on any support,

     Its great weight hangs in the ether around it.

Its own revolutions keep its orb balanced,

     It has no sharp angles to press on anything,

And it’s placed in the midst of the heavens,

     And isn’t nearer or further from any side,

For if it weren’t convex, it would be nearer somewhere,

     And the universe wouldn’t have Earth’s weight at its centre.

There’s a globe suspended, enclosed by Syracusan art,

     That’s a small replica of the vast heavens,

And the Earth’s equidistant from top and bottom.

     Which is achieved by its spherical shape.

The form of this temple’s the same: there’s no angle

     Projecting from it: a rotunda saves it from the rain.

You ask why the goddess is served by virgins?

     I’ll reveal the true reason for that as well.

They say that Juno and Ceres were born of Ops

     By Saturn’s seed, Vesta was the third daughter:

The others married, both bore children they say,

     The third was always unable to tolerate men.

What wonder if a virgin delights in virgin servants,

     And only allows chaste hands to touch her sacred relics?

Realize that Vesta is nothing but living flame,

     And you’ll see that no bodies are born from her.

She’s truly a virgin, who neither accepts seed

     Nor yields it, and she loves virgin companions.

I foolishly thought for ages that there were statues

     Of Vesta, later I learnt there were none beneath her dome:

An undying fire is concealed with the shrine,

     But there’s no image of Vesta or of fire.

The earth’s supported by its energy: Vesta’s so called from ‘depending

     On energy’ (vi stando), and that could be the reason for her Greek name.

But the hearth (focus) is named from its fire that warms (fovet) all things:

     Formerly it stood in the most important room.

I think the vestibule was so called from Vesta too:

     In praying we address Vesta first, who holds first place.

It was once the custom to sit on long benches by the fire,

     And believe the gods were present at the meal:

Even now in sacrificing to ancient Vacuna,

     They sit and stand in front of her altar hearths.

Something of ancient custom has passed to us:

     A clean dish contains the food offered to Vesta.

See, loaves are hung from garlanded mules,

     And flowery wreaths veil the rough millstones.

Once farmers only used to parch wheat in their ovens,

     (And the goddess of ovens has her sacred rites):

The hearth baked the bread, set under the embers,

     On a broken tile placed there on the heated floor.

So the baker honours the hearth, and the lady of hearths,

     And the she-ass that turns the pumice millstones.

 

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66516 From: Shoshana Hathaway Date: 2009-06-09
Subject: Re: Best Wishes on the Vestalia
Salve Maxima Valeria Messallina,
 
To you, Virgo Maxima, I offer my great respect and deep esteem.  I honor you, and your apprentices, and here, publicly, express my gratitude for what you do on our behalf.
 
To Vesta, my deepest reverence, humble prayers, and joyous praise, as ever.
Most Respectfully,
C. Maria Caeca
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Monday, June 08, 2009 11:15 PM
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Best Wishes on the Vestalia

M. Valerius Potitus Maxima Valeria Messallina SPD.

 

On the occasion of the Vestalia, I want to extend best wishes to my honored cousin, the Chief Vestal of Nova Roma. May Vesta, Custos Flammae, bless you in your endeavors to restore her worship.

 

Vale,

Potitus

 

I offer the following from Ovid’s “Fasti”, Book VI. Vesta Mater, fave me.

 

Vesta, favour me! IÂ’ll open my lips now in your service,

     If IÂ’m indeed allowed to attend your sacred rites.

I was rapt in prayer: I felt the heavenly deity,

     And the happy earth shone with radiant light.

Not that I saw you, goddess (away with poetsÂ’ lies!)

     Nor were you to be looked on by any man:

But I knew what IÂ’d not known, and the errors

     IÂ’d held to were corrected without instruction.

They say Rome had celebrated the Parilia forty times,

     When the goddess, the Guardian of the Flame, was received

In her shrine, the work of Numa, that peace-loving king,

     (None more god-fearing was ever born in Sabine lands.)

The roofs you see of bronze were roofs of straw then,

     And its walls were made of wickerwork.

This meagre spot that supports the Hall of Vesta

     Was then the mighty palace of unshorn Numa.

Yet the form of the temple, that remains, they say,

     Is as before, and is shaped so for good reason.

VestaÂ’s identified with Earth: in them bothÂ’s unsleeping fire:

     Earth and the hearth are both symbols of home.

The EarthÂ’s a ball not resting on any support,

     Its great weight hangs in the ether around it.

Its own revolutions keep its orb balanced,

     It has no sharp angles to press on anything,

And itÂ’s placed in the midst of the heavens,

     And isnÂ’t nearer or further from any side,

For if it werenÂ’t convex, it would be nearer somewhere,

     And the universe wouldnÂ’t have EarthÂ’s weight at its centre.

ThereÂ’s a globe suspended, enclosed by Syracusan art,

     ThatÂ’s a small replica of the vast heavens,

And the EarthÂ’s equidistant from top and bottom.

     Which is achieved by its spherical shape.

The form of this templeÂ’s the same: thereÂ’s no angle

     Projecting from it: a rotunda saves it from the rain.

You ask why the goddess is served by virgins?

     IÂ’ll reveal the true reason for that as well.

They say that Juno and Ceres were born of Ops

     By SaturnÂ’s seed, Vesta was the third daughter:

The others married, both bore children they say,

     The third was always unable to tolerate men.

What wonder if a virgin delights in virgin servants,

     And only allows chaste hands to touch her sacred relics?

Realize that Vesta is nothing but living flame,

     And youÂ’ll see that no bodies are born from her.

SheÂ’s truly a virgin, who neither accepts seed

     Nor yields it, and she loves virgin companions.

I foolishly thought for ages that there were statues

     Of Vesta, later I learnt there were none beneath her dome:

An undying fire is concealed with the shrine,

     But thereÂ’s no image of Vesta or of fire.

The earth’s supported by its energy: Vesta’s so called from ‘depending

     On energyÂ’ (vi stando), and that could be the reason for her Greek name.

But the hearth (focus) is named from its fire that warms (fovet) all things:

     Formerly it stood in the most important room.

I think the vestibule was so called from Vesta too:

     In praying we address Vesta first, who holds first place.

It was once the custom to sit on long benches by the fire,

     And believe the gods were present at the meal:

Even now in sacrificing to ancient Vacuna,

     They sit and stand in front of her altar hearths.

Something of ancient custom has passed to us:

     A clean dish contains the food offered to Vesta.

See, loaves are hung from garlanded mules,

     And flowery wreaths veil the rough millstones.

Once farmers only used to parch wheat in their ovens,

     (And the goddess of ovens has her sacred rites):

The hearth baked the bread, set under the embers,

     On a broken tile placed there on the heated floor.

So the baker honours the hearth, and the lady of hearths,

     And the she-ass that turns the pumice millstones.

 



No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 8.5.339 / Virus Database: 270.12.58/2164 - Release Date: 06/08/09 17:59:00

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66517 From: Jesse Corradino Date: 2009-06-09
Subject: Re: Another little brag. . .
The recipe in the link looks weird to me.  My family is from Catanzaro so maybe our recipe isn't properly sicilian (which is where I think the dish comes from) so we make a different version of brazghul (phonetic sp, obviously) that consists of hard boiled eggs, romano cheese, salt, pepper, parsely, and garlic.  Have your butcher tenderize some top round cuts and roll all of the ingredients into the steak.  Tooth pick or butcher tie and simmer in lard or oil in a pan until brown.  I cook it extra with a fresh marinara after the brazghul is already browned for about a half hour or until my sauce is reduced.  My coup de grace is to serve the sauce with spinach ravioli instead of just eating the brazghul by itself.  
 
 
> To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> From: famila.ulleria.venii@...
> Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2009 19:02:34 -0500
> Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: Another little brag. . .
>
> Ave Maior;
>
> On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 6:06 PM, Maior<rory12001@...> wrote:
> >
> > Salvete Venator Juliaque;
> > ecastor I'm hungry, I had no nonna and instead got chicken soup a poor
> > second in my opinion to Italian cuisine;-) So thank you for sharing and I'd
> > love more recipes from our cives. Food definitely is something we should be
> > discussing in the forum!
> > bene vale
> > Maior
> >
> > here is the link to the NRwiki! add more recipes omnes:)
> > http://www.novaroma.org/nr/Bracciola
> >
>
> I think if you and I can keep discussions to matters of plate and cup,
> we might just have common ground after all ,-)
>
> Just for you then, Nonnie D'Orazio's Zuppa Jennie (named after her
> mother, Giovannia Mastroianni, nee Riciardelli), know elsewhere as
> Italian Wedding Soup. . .a term I had not heard until after I'd moved
> to Illinois in 1996, 39 years after I'd been born .-)
>
> Foodstuffs: 4 qt home made chicken stock, 1# ea ground chicken and
> veal, 1/2 c dried bread - finely grated, 2 lg chicken eggs - beaten, 1
> t ea dried oregano, basil and parsley - rubbed to small particles, 6
> cloves garlic - crushed, 1 t ea salt and fresh-ground black pepper, 2
> c long grain rice, 2 c ea spinach, escarole, endive and leek - coarse
> chopped and a bowl of freshly shredded Asiago d'allevo or
> Parmigiano-Reggiano for garnishing
>
> Method: While bringing the stock to a boil, mix well the ground
> meats, bread crumbs, eggs, herbs, garlic, salt and pepper. Shape mix
> into small balls, about the size of chestnuts. Drop a few at a time
> into the boiling stock, so as to not reduce the temperature; cook
> about 10 minutes. Stir in the rice and cook an additional 15 minutes.
> Stir in the greens and cook 15 more minutes.
>
> Serve in a wide, shallow soup bowl with a libel sprinkling of cheese.
>
> Side dishes, if this is the main course; fresh baked bread with butter
> and a mix of string beans and summer squash - steamed and dressed with
> balsamic vinegar mixed with a bit of brown mustard.
>
> Vale - Venator
>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
> <*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma/
>
> <*> Your email settings:
> Individual Email | Traditional
>
> <*> To change settings online go to:
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma/join
> (Yahoo! ID required)
>
> <*> To change settings via email:
> mailto:Nova-Roma-digest@yahoogroups.com
> mailto:Nova-Roma-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com
>
> <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
> <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
> http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>


Windows Liveâ„¢: Keep your life in sync. Check it out.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66518 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2009-06-09
Subject: Re: Intercessio!
Cato Galerio Aureliano sal.

Salve.

Your veto is incorrect, as is most of the argument surrounding this issue. Vipsanius Agrippa has not pronounced intercessio against the right of the People to hold or vote in elections, nor did he veto the results themselves (nor could he, as neither the act of voting nor the results of an election are acts of a magistrate). He has issued a veto against the certification of the results by the custodes and the acceptance of the results by the consuls, which *are* acts of magistrates, based on the fact that he believes the results reflect a violation of the Constitution.

In point of fact a tribune *can* stop a vote or an election from happening in the first place - this is the law under Nova Roma and was actually practiced by the ancient Romans - so stopping an election or a vote on legislation is *not* un-Roman in the least. It is the assumption - and application - of current post-Enlightenment political theory that makes this seem "unfair", but the ancient Romans would have recognized it as perfectly valid.

Those who beat the "be Roman, act Roman, follow the Romans" drum should understand that actual ancient Roman political practice was not really in any way democratic or "fair" by contemporary standards.


Vale.

Cato



--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Robert Levee <galerius_of_rome@...> wrote:
>
>
> Salve et salvete,
>
> "I, Appius Galerius Aurelianus, tribune of the Plebs,
>
> In application of the paragraph IV.A.7b.of the Constitution of Nova Roma,
>
> Considering the Constitution of Nova Roma and of the laws which applies it and
> define the powers of the tribunes of the Plebs, especially in case of an intercessio,
>
> Considering the message nb 66421 issued in the Forum last Jun 7, 2009 4:32 pm by which
> Tribune G. Vipsanius Agrippa has pronounced "intercessio against the custodes Marcus Lucretius Agricola and
> Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus in certifying the election of Caeso Fabius Buteo
> Modianus as censor and against the consuls Marcus Iulius Severus and Marcus
> Cornelius Complutensis in accepting the election results",
>
> Considering that this intercessio violates the Constitution, and especially its
> article II, B, 3,
>
> Hereby veto the intercession thrown by Tribune G. Vipsanius Agrippa last Jun 7, 2009 4:32 pm."
>
> I have quoted the article II, B, 3 of the constitution. There may be other arguments, but this one (the right of Novaromans to take part in elections) is one of the good grounds here, for a tribune should never be eager to make his own voice prevailing on the People's one.
>
> Vale et valete,
> Ap.Galerius Aurelianus
> Tribune of the Plebs
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66520 From: Lucius Coruncanius Cato Date: 2009-06-09
Subject: Re: Following in my Pater's footsteps
Salve Diana!

Please don't mix things. I was one who called for the intercessio, but when I called for the intercessio on the appointment, it was not against you, or those who were appointed. It was against an  appointment made by a single censor, when it must be done by both censors.

The best way to fix things is to stay within, and work togheter. Our Res Publica needs, now more than ever, capable people. And this goes too to your Pater. NR needs you in, not out. Please, reconsider your decision.

Di te incolumem custodiant.
--
L. Coruncanius Cato
Aedilis Curulis
Scriba Consulis Hispaniae

--- El lun, 8/6/09, D.O.A. <roman.babe@...> escribió:

De: D.O.A. <roman.babe@...>
Asunto: Re: [Nova-Roma] Following in my Pater's footsteps
Para: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Fecha: lunes, 8 junio, 2009 11:05

Salve Uncle,
Thanks for your email. It's nice to know you care. :-)

<If you change your mind later, as you have done in the past, I will do
everything possible to prevent your return to Nova Roma.?

Actually, I have never resigned and then changed my mind. I have never quit
anything in NR and then changed my mind. I'm just tired of the fighting and
am bowing out of it.

<You can stay and try to fix this mess we are in or you can quit.?
No one wants me to stay and help fix this mess, considering the negative
reaction to me being appointed Senator. That was embarrassing.

Vale,
Diana
>


Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66521 From: Lucius Coruncanius Cato Date: 2009-06-09
Subject: Re: Intercessio
L. Coruncanius Cato Fabio Maximo SPD

I said that lex, and others, was open to a really huge amounts of interpretation. Laws should be made to ease things. If we must ask the writter in every case which was the intent, then we do not need those laws. Words mean what they mean.
This lex, and others, must be rewritten to avoid this kind of situations where lots of people quarrel about this or that meaning of this or that word. The Law Review commitee was created for that.

You too hear and take only what you want. Then we agree on something.

Di vos incolumem custodiant.
--
L. Coruncanius Cato
Aedilis Curulis
Scriba Consulis Hispaniae

--- El lun, 8/6/09, QFabiusMaxmi@... <QFabiusMaxmi@...> escribió:

De: QFabiusMaxmi@... <QFabiusMaxmi@...>
Asunto: Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: Intercessio
Para: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Fecha: lunes, 8 junio, 2009 11:10

In a message dated 6/8/2009 3:32:24 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time, l.coruncanius_ cato@yahoo. com writes:
Of course! Now the issue is that "the important centuries were occupied by government friends". Sorry sir, but this is NOT the issue here.
The issue is you do not accept the results of an election. The issue is you ignored a proposal on the Law Review Comitee to rewrite this vague and open to interpretation law, stating that "the writer of the law was to mean that" ...
Of course.  I wish the government would stop saying the "people" when they mean "the government"
 
And per usual you miss the point.  The rule author is still alive and communicated his intention, which you disregarded since it was what not what you wanted to hear.   In the military history simulation biz we have a term for that.  Its called "cheaters... "
 
Q. Fabius Maximus

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66522 From: marcushoratius Date: 2009-06-09
Subject: a. d. V Eidus Iuniae: VESTALIA; Vacuna; Carrhae
M. Moravius Piscinus cultoribus Deorum et omnibus salutem plurimam dicit: Vacuna felicitatem in nos impertiat.

Hodie est ante diem V Eidus Iunoniae; haec dies nefastus est: VESTALIA; feriae Vacunae

VESTALIA

Today marks the anniversary of the dedication of the Temple of Vesta founded by King Numa Pompilius. This was the most sacred of all the temples of Rome. Here was kept the sacred and eternal flame of Vesta, and it was also where Rome's most holy relics were stored such as the Palladium.

Since 1885, when J. G. Frazer first published the theory in the 'Journal of Philology,' it has been widely accepted that the sacred fire of Vesta symbolized the hearth of the king and that the Vestales attending the fire must therefore represent the daughters of the king. Frazer had based his ideas on the Vestales from comparisons with other cultures. In one example, the priestess who attended the perpetual fire of the South African tribe in Damaraland was the daughter of the chief. Frazer also cited peasant customs of Calabria in southern Italy: "At the present day the fire in a Calabrian peasant's house is never (except after a death) allowed to die quite out, even in the heat of summer; it is a bad omen if it should chance to be extinguished, and the girls of the house, whose special care it is to keep at least a single brand burning on the hearth, are sadly dismayed at such a mishap."

In another famous study by Mircea Eliade, "Shamanism: Archaic Techniques of Ecstasy" (1964), comparing cultural aspects from societies all over the globe, the hearth represents the Center. It is where the different levels of the greater Universe conjoin in a central axis, the axis mundi. And thus the hearth can represent the Golden Age when Gods and Heroes traversed the planes of existence along this central axis. The Axis Mundi may be symbolized by the Tree of Life, or by Mount Meru, the ziggurat of Babylon, the Temple of the Sun at Chitzen Itza, or the Cathedral of Chartres, but all of these symbols represent a degeneration from the original condition of the Golden Age and a desire for its return.

"The symbolism of the 'Center' is not necessarily a cosmological idea. In the beginning, `Center,' or site of a possible break-through in plane, was applied to any sacred space, that is, any space that had been the scene of a hierophany and so manifested realities (or forces, figures, etc.) that were not of our world, that came from elsewhere and primarily from the sky. The idea of Center followed from experience of a sacred space, impregnated by a transhuman presence: at this particular point something from above (or from below) had manifested itself. Later, it was supposed that manifestation of the sacred in itself implied a break-through in plane."

So long as Vesta's perpetual fire was properly attended, the pact between the People of Rome and the celestial Gods would remain intact. But the temple that housed Her sacred fire also held the most sacred relics that connected the People of Rome to the celestial Gods, to the Di Indiges, and to the Maiores who guarded the City. Today's festival is not about the fire of Vesta. It is about this other aspect of Her temple and what was stored in the inner sanctum. The Palladium and other sacred relics held numina of Gods and Heroes. The Palladium was a statue of Minerva that was carried off by Odysseus and Diomedes from Ilium. Aeneas regained it and brought the Palladium to Latium. Thus was the Palladium thought to be a relic of the hero, perhaps not unlike how the Shroud of Turin is thought to be by some Christians. More so it was said that Minerva had crafted the statue, placing something of Herself into it. The safety of the City depended upon Rome's possession of the Palladium. The other relics to be found here were of a similar nature. Thus when the matrons entered the Temple of Vesta on this day and came into the chamber that held the holiest of relics, thereby did they come into the very presence of the Gods.

We know that the matrons, led by the flamenica Dialis, brought sacrifices to the temple and that through the first half of June they assisted the Vestales in cleaning the Temple of Vesta. But in telling those details something is lost of the significance women played in the religio Romana in maintaining the Pax Deorum with rites that only women could perform.


The Floating Isle of Vacuna

Today also celebrates the feriae Vacunae. Vacuna is the Sabine Goddess of forests, hunting, and victory. The sacred grove of Vacuna was on the shores of Lake Velinus, outside Reate and near the farm of the poet Horace. Horace alluded to the restive country life with his reference to Vacuna's sanctuary, comparing its rustic character as crumbling and moldering, unlike the gilded temples of Rome (Horatius Flaccus, Epistle 1.10.49). From Montenero di Bisaccia, Molise, comes another dedicatory inscription to Vacuna from Samnium in addition to one found at Sabine Reate (AE 1979, 199; ILS 9248). Ancient traditions prevailed at Her sanctuary, where "the different religions of the allies, who had dedicated sacred rites, groves, and altars to the rivers of their country (Tacitus, Annales 1.79)." Still kept there was a custom of men standing while they shared a meal around Vacuna's hearth. As the Goddess Victoria, primarily in hunting, the Romans sometimes confused Vacuna with the Sabine war Goddess Bellona, and with Athene (Minerva) by the Greeks. As a Goddess of hunting, Vacuna protected fields and gardens, and thus is sometimes confused with Venus and Ceres. Perhaps the oddest part of Her cultus was that Her shrine was said to be on a floating island (L. Annaeus Seneca, Naturales Quaestiones 3.25.8).

"Seventy stades from Reate stood Cutilia, a famous city, beside a mountain. Not far from it there is a lake, four hundred feet in diameter, filled by everflowing natural springs and, it is said, bottomless. This lake, as having something divine about p51it, the inhabitants of the country look upon as sacred to Victory (Vacuna); and surrounding it with a palisade, so that no one may approach the water, they keep it inviolate; except that at certain times each year those whose sacred office it is go to the little island in the lake and perform the sacrifices required by custom. 2 This island is about fifty feet in diameter and rises not more than a foot above the water; it is not fixed, and floats about in any direction, according to as the wind gently wafts it from one place to another. An herb grows on the island like the flowering rush and also certain small shrubs, a phenomenon which to those who are unacquainted with the works of Nature seems unaccountable and a marvel second to none." ~ Dionysius of Halicarnassus, Roman Antiquities 1.15


AUC 700 / 53 BCE: Battle of Carrhae, where M. Licinius Crassus is defeated by the Persians under Surenas

After a series of ill-advised maneuvers and plunders, Crassus allowed himself to be lured into the desert away from his garrisons in northern Syria, away from his line of communication along the rivers, and against the advice of his Armenian allies to operate from their mountainous region where he would have some protection from the Parthian light cavalry. Caught out in the open desert with seven legions, four-thousand cavalry, and an assortment of light infantry, Crassus found himself surrounded and he Parthians relying on their missiles to engage Romans.

"Now as long as they had hopes that the enemy would exhaust their missiles and desist from battle or fight at close quarters, the Romans held out; but when they perceived that many camels laden with arrows were at hand, from which the Parthians who first encircled them took a fresh supply, then Crassus, seeing no end to this, began to lose heart....Then the Romans halted, supposing that the enemy would come to close quarters with them, since they were so few in number. But the Parthians stationed their mail-clad horsemen in front of the Romans, and then with the rest of their cavalry in loose array rode round them, tearing up the surface of the ground, and raising from the depths great heaps of sand which fell in limitless showers of dust, so that the Romans could neither see clearly nor speak plainly, but, being crowded into a narrow compass and feeling upon one another, were shot, and died no easy nor even speedy death. For, in the agonies of convulsive pain, and writing about the arrows, they would break them off in their wounds, and then in trying to pull out by force the barbed heads which had pierced their veins and sinews, they tore and disfigured themselves the more. Thus many died, and the survivors also were incapacitated for fighting. And when Publius urged them to charge the enemy's mail-clad horsemen, they showed him that their hands were riveted to their shields and their feet nailed through and through to the ground, so that they were helpless either for flight or for self-defence." ~ Plutarch, Life of Crassus 25

"For if they decided to lock shields for the purpose of avoiding the arrows by the closeness of their array, the pikemen were upon them with a rush, striking down some, and at least scattering the others; and if they extended their ranks to avoid this, they would be struck with the arrows. Hereupon many died from fright at the very charge of the pikemen, and many perished hemmed in by the horsemen. Others were knocked over by the pikes or were carried off transfixed. The missiles falling thick upon them from all sides at once struck down many by a mortal blow, rendered many useless for battle, and caused distress to all. They flew into their eyes and pierced their hands and all the other parts of their body and, penetrating their armour, deprived them of their protection and compelled them to expose themselves to each new missile. Thus, while a man was guarding against arrows or pulling out one that had stuck fast he received more wounds, one after another. Consequently it was impracticable for them to move, and impracticable to remain at rest. Neither course afforded them safety but each was fraught with destruction, the one because it was out of their power, and the other because they were then more easily wounded....Finally, as the enemy continually assaulted them from all sides at once, and they were compelled to protect their exposed parts by the shields of those who stood beside them, they were shut up in so narrow a place that they could no longer move. Indeed, they could not even get a sure footing by reason of the number of corpses, but kept falling over them. The heat and thirst (it was midsummer and this action took place at noon) and the dust, of which the barbarians raised as much as possible by all riding around them, told fearfully up the survivors, and many succumbed from these causes, even though unwounded." ~ Dio Cassius, Roman History 40.22, 23

At least twenty-thousand were lost in battle, with the rest of Crassus' army, roughly ten-thousand, captured. Part of these prisoners are believed to have eventually made their way to China where they served as a mercenary contingent.


AUC 815 / 62 CE: Death of Octavia ordered by Nero. Octavia was Nero's first wife and was on Pandateria where she had been exiled for adultery.

AUC 821 / 68 CE: Death of Nero by suicide.

AUC 946 / 193 CE: Septimus Severus enters Rome and is named pontifex maximus.


Today's thought is from Demophilus 34:

"Be persuaded that those things are not your riches which you do not possess in the penetralia of the reasoning powers."
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66523 From: Publius Ullerius Stephanus Venator Date: 2009-06-09
Subject: Re: Another little brag. . .
Salvete;

On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 12:26 AM, Jesse Corradino wrote:
>
> The recipe in the link looks weird to me.  My family is from Catanzaro so
> maybe our recipe isn't properly sicilian (which is where I think the dish
> comes from) so we make a different version of brazghul (phonetic sp,
> obviously) that consists of hard boiled eggs, romano cheese, salt, pepper,
> parsely, and garlic.  Have your butcher tenderize some top round cuts
> and roll all of the ingredients into the steak.  Tooth pick or butcher tie
> and simmer in lard or oil in a pan until brown.  I cook it extra with a
> fresh marinara after the brazghul is already browned for about a half hour
> or until my sauce is reduced.  My coup de grace is to serve the sauce with
> spinach ravioli instead of just eating the brazghul by itself.
>

Regional difference: Great grandma Mastroianni (nee Riciardelli) was
born in Avellino, Campagna about 1891. Came to America as the result
of an arranged marriage. She refused to wed, as the prospective groom
was too short. She demanded, and got, her dowry back; found her own
husband. 9 of her 10 children made it to adulthood and marriages of
their own.

Both Nonnie and Papa showed me how to cook; she the Camganian style of
her upbringing, him the Abruzzese.

=====================================
In amicitia et fide
Publius Ullerius Stephanus Venator
Civis circa Quintilis MMDCCLI a.u.c.
Patrician, Paterfamilias
Religio Septentrionalis - Poeta

Dominus Sodalitas Coquuorum et Cerevisiae Coctorum
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Sodalis_Coq_et_Coq/

http://www.myspace.com/venator_poetus
http://anheathenreader.blogspot.com/
http://www.catamount-grange-hearth.org/
http://www.cafepress.com/catamountgrange
--
May the Holy Powers smile on our efforts.
May the Spirits of our family lines nod in approval.
May we be of Worth to our fellow Nova Romans.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66524 From: marcushoratius Date: 2009-06-09
Subject: Re: Intercessio!
Salve Cato

The only problem with your reasoning here is the discrepency between Agrippa's veto against the actions of magistrates and the reasoning he gave behind it. The reasoning he gave really concerned the candidacy of Modianus, based on an interpretation by Sulla, Gnaeus Caesar, and Potitius as to the meaning of "consecutive." That was a misinterpretation IMHO. We are nearly six months into the year. The history behind the issue of electing suffecti in Nova Roma, even going back to the time when suffecti were appointed by the Senate, never considered "consecutive" in the way it has been misinterpreted by these few individuals for their own political reasons. The conflict here has nothing to do with the law. None the less...

If the problem was in the candidacy then a Tribunus Plebis should have vetoed the candidacy before the Comitia met. That is, he could have vetoed the Consul's acceptance of the candidacy of someone he thought unqualified. That would allow other candidates to be reviewed and "certified" by the Consuls as eligible and the Tribuni given an opportunity to review the eligibility of all candidates prior to the Comitia assembling.

However, Tribunus Agrippa vetoed the certification process conducted by the Custodes after the election. He gave no reason as to why he thought that process of certification was in error. Once the candidates were set, the Comitia having already concluded its voting, the issue of candidacies was over. To veto the Custodes over a candidacy is a non sequiter. So what, I would like to know, did the Tribunus see in error with the certification process itself to overthrow what the People had decided? If the Custodes found no error in the election process of the Comitia itself and therefore legally certified the results, then Agrippa's intercessio is without basis and should be withdrawn.

Vale
M. Moravius Piscinus

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Gaius Equitius Cato" <mlcinnyc@...> wrote:
>
> Cato Galerio Aureliano sal.
>
> Salve.
>
> Your veto is incorrect, as is most of the argument surrounding this issue. Vipsanius Agrippa has not pronounced intercessio against the right of the People to hold or vote in elections, nor did he veto the results themselves (nor could he, as neither the act of voting nor the results of an election are acts of a magistrate). He has issued a veto against the certification of the results by the custodes and the acceptance of the results by the consuls, which *are* acts of magistrates, based on the fact that he believes the results reflect a violation of the Constitution.
>
> In point of fact a tribune *can* stop a vote or an election from happening in the first place - this is the law under Nova Roma and was actually practiced by the ancient Romans - so stopping an election or a vote on legislation is *not* un-Roman in the least. It is the assumption - and application - of current post-Enlightenment political theory that makes this seem "unfair", but the ancient Romans would have recognized it as perfectly valid.
>
> Those who beat the "be Roman, act Roman, follow the Romans" drum should understand that actual ancient Roman political practice was not really in any way democratic or "fair" by contemporary standards.
>
>
> Vale.
>
> Cato
>
>
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Robert Levee <galerius_of_rome@> wrote:
> >
> >
> > Salve et salvete,
> >
> > "I, Appius Galerius Aurelianus, tribune of the Plebs,
> >
> > In application of the paragraph IV.A.7b.of the Constitution of Nova Roma,
> >
> > Considering the Constitution of Nova Roma and of the laws which applies it and
> > define the powers of the tribunes of the Plebs, especially in case of an intercessio,
> >
> > Considering the message nb 66421 issued in the Forum last Jun 7, 2009 4:32 pm by which
> > Tribune G. Vipsanius Agrippa has pronounced "intercessio against the custodes Marcus Lucretius Agricola and
> > Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus in certifying the election of Caeso Fabius Buteo
> > Modianus as censor and against the consuls Marcus Iulius Severus and Marcus
> > Cornelius Complutensis in accepting the election results",
> >
> > Considering that this intercessio violates the Constitution, and especially its
> > article II, B, 3,
> >
> > Hereby veto the intercession thrown by Tribune G. Vipsanius Agrippa last Jun 7, 2009 4:32 pm."
> >
> > I have quoted the article II, B, 3 of the constitution. There may be other arguments, but this one (the right of Novaromans to take part in elections) is one of the good grounds here, for a tribune should never be eager to make his own voice prevailing on the People's one.
> >
> > Vale et valete,
> > Ap.Galerius Aurelianus
> > Tribune of the Plebs
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66525 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2009-06-09
Subject: Re: Intercessio!
Cato Moravio Piscino sal.

Salve.

Vipsanius' veto says that since the very basis upon which these results are being presented is flawed, and the basis upon which the consuls are accepting them is equally flawed, they cannot be either certified or accepted under our law. The analogy might be drawn between a manufacturer, a parts tester, and an inspector.

Say a car is manufactured, and the brakes are faulty. The parts test results miss the flaw and it is passed. An inspector finds the fault in the brakes and returns the car to the manufacturer, saying that the testers were incorrect and that the car in is inherently flawed and cannot be driven. It doesn't matter if the publicity stills are in magazines already, or the ad campaign is in full swing, or even if the manufacturer has received tens of thousands of orders. If the car is flawed it cannot be driven.

Certification and acceptance of the results are two more opportunities we have to protect the law of the Respublica; where they failed earlier, the tribunes can uphold the law in this instance. In fact, the custodes could have refused to certify the results on the same basis, that they are flawed by virtue of the candidate's inability to stand for the office. The consuls and praetors have the same opportunity, but it is clearly not in their interests (personal/political, that is, as following the law is demonstrably not within their concept of the well-being of the Respublica) to do so.

Right now, by the virtue of the tribune's veto in accordance with our law, we have a sole censor in office, Galerius Paulinus.

Vale,

Cato



--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "marcushoratius" <MHoratius@...> wrote:
>
> Salve Cato
>
> The only problem with your reasoning here is the discrepency between Agrippa's veto against the actions of magistrates and the reasoning he gave behind it. The reasoning he gave really concerned the candidacy of Modianus, based on an interpretation by Sulla, Gnaeus Caesar, and Potitius as to the meaning of "consecutive." That was a misinterpretation IMHO. We are nearly six months into the year. The history behind the issue of electing suffecti in Nova Roma, even going back to the time when suffecti were appointed by the Senate, never considered "consecutive" in the way it has been misinterpreted by these few individuals for their own political reasons. The conflict here has nothing to do with the law. None the less...
>
> If the problem was in the candidacy then a Tribunus Plebis should have vetoed the candidacy before the Comitia met. That is, he could have vetoed the Consul's acceptance of the candidacy of someone he thought unqualified. That would allow other candidates to be reviewed and "certified" by the Consuls as eligible and the Tribuni given an opportunity to review the eligibility of all candidates prior to the Comitia assembling.
>
> However, Tribunus Agrippa vetoed the certification process conducted by the Custodes after the election. He gave no reason as to why he thought that process of certification was in error. Once the candidates were set, the Comitia having already concluded its voting, the issue of candidacies was over. To veto the Custodes over a candidacy is a non sequiter. So what, I would like to know, did the Tribunus see in error with the certification process itself to overthrow what the People had decided? If the Custodes found no error in the election process of the Comitia itself and therefore legally certified the results, then Agrippa's intercessio is without basis and should be withdrawn.
>
> Vale
> M. Moravius Piscinus
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Gaius Equitius Cato" <mlcinnyc@> wrote:
> >
> > Cato Galerio Aureliano sal.
> >
> > Salve.
> >
> > Your veto is incorrect, as is most of the argument surrounding this issue. Vipsanius Agrippa has not pronounced intercessio against the right of the People to hold or vote in elections, nor did he veto the results themselves (nor could he, as neither the act of voting nor the results of an election are acts of a magistrate). He has issued a veto against the certification of the results by the custodes and the acceptance of the results by the consuls, which *are* acts of magistrates, based on the fact that he believes the results reflect a violation of the Constitution.
> >
> > In point of fact a tribune *can* stop a vote or an election from happening in the first place - this is the law under Nova Roma and was actually practiced by the ancient Romans - so stopping an election or a vote on legislation is *not* un-Roman in the least. It is the assumption - and application - of current post-Enlightenment political theory that makes this seem "unfair", but the ancient Romans would have recognized it as perfectly valid.
> >
> > Those who beat the "be Roman, act Roman, follow the Romans" drum should understand that actual ancient Roman political practice was not really in any way democratic or "fair" by contemporary standards.
> >
> >
> > Vale.
> >
> > Cato
> >
> >
> >
> > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Robert Levee <galerius_of_rome@> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > Salve et salvete,
> > >
> > > "I, Appius Galerius Aurelianus, tribune of the Plebs,
> > >
> > > In application of the paragraph IV.A.7b.of the Constitution of Nova Roma,
> > >
> > > Considering the Constitution of Nova Roma and of the laws which applies it and
> > > define the powers of the tribunes of the Plebs, especially in case of an intercessio,
> > >
> > > Considering the message nb 66421 issued in the Forum last Jun 7, 2009 4:32 pm by which
> > > Tribune G. Vipsanius Agrippa has pronounced "intercessio against the custodes Marcus Lucretius Agricola and
> > > Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus in certifying the election of Caeso Fabius Buteo
> > > Modianus as censor and against the consuls Marcus Iulius Severus and Marcus
> > > Cornelius Complutensis in accepting the election results",
> > >
> > > Considering that this intercessio violates the Constitution, and especially its
> > > article II, B, 3,
> > >
> > > Hereby veto the intercession thrown by Tribune G. Vipsanius Agrippa last Jun 7, 2009 4:32 pm."
> > >
> > > I have quoted the article II, B, 3 of the constitution. There may be other arguments, but this one (the right of Novaromans to take part in elections) is one of the good grounds here, for a tribune should never be eager to make his own voice prevailing on the People's one.
> > >
> > > Vale et valete,
> > > Ap.Galerius Aurelianus
> > > Tribune of the Plebs
> > >
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66526 From: L Julia Aquila Date: 2009-06-09
Subject: Re: Another little brag. . .
Salvete,

I think I am going to make Bracciole this weekend, I think I am now *compelled* to make it!
Bracciole is not just Sicilian although I think most Americans are oriented to Sicilian Italian Americans because of the Media and because of the many immigrants from that beautiful area. However, my maternal grandparents from the north, Nonny (or Grandmere as we referred to her respectfully outside of family) was from the Ligurian region and Poppy (Grandpere) was from the foothills of the Italian Alps. My Paternal Grandfather was from the L'Aquila region and my maternal Grandmother was from the seaside not far from Rome. Here are other recipes for Bracciole with a bit of information, also note the different spellings- and the different ingredients:
http://recipegal.com/Italian/Bracciole.htm
http://italianfood.about.com/od/beefbracioleetc/Beef_Veal_Braciole_Involtini_Steaks_Etc.htm
I use about 2 pounds of thinly sliced, enough to make approx six large thin slices, and well beaten, or tenderized round steak, 8 cloves of chopped garlic, one very thinly sliced red onion, one very thinly sliced green bell pepper, about 2/3 cup of Pecorino Romano grated cheese, approx four cups of breadcrumbs, oregano, sweet basil, salt and pepper and four sliced hard boiled eggs. Mix all the ingredients except for the eggs, spread the mixture over the meat, place the eggs on top of the breadcrumb mixture, roll them up, tuck in the ends, tie them with string. Fry them in olive oil until they are nicely browned, then toss them in huge pot of tomato sauce and let them simmer until they are super tender. This makes about six servings, more if you are serving pasta also.
As to the regional differences all I can say is vive la différence!

Valete,
Julia


--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Publius Ullerius Stephanus Venator <famila.ulleria.venii@...> wrote:
>
> Salvete;
>
> On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 12:26 AM, Jesse Corradino wrote:
> >
> > The recipe in the link looks weird to me.  My family is from Catanzaro so
> > maybe our recipe isn't properly sicilian (which is where I think the dish
> > comes from) so we make a different version of brazghul (phonetic sp,
> > obviously) that consists of hard boiled eggs, romano cheese, salt, pepper,
> > parsely, and garlic.  Have your butcher tenderize some top round cuts
> > and roll all of the ingredients into the steak.  Tooth pick or butcher tie
> > and simmer in lard or oil in a pan until brown.  I cook it extra with a
> > fresh marinara after the brazghul is already browned for about a half hour
> > or until my sauce is reduced.  My coup de grace is to serve the sauce with
> > spinach ravioli instead of just eating the brazghul by itself.
> >
>
> Regional difference: Great grandma Mastroianni (nee Riciardelli) was
> born in Avellino, Campagna about 1891. Came to America as the result
> of an arranged marriage. She refused to wed, as the prospective groom
> was too short. She demanded, and got, her dowry back; found her own
> husband. 9 of her 10 children made it to adulthood and marriages of
> their own.
>
> Both Nonnie and Papa showed me how to cook; she the Camganian style of
> her upbringing, him the Abruzzese.
>
> =====================================
> In amicitia et fide
> Publius Ullerius Stephanus Venator
> Civis circa Quintilis MMDCCLI a.u.c.
> Patrician, Paterfamilias
> Religio Septentrionalis - Poeta
>
> Dominus Sodalitas Coquuorum et Cerevisiae Coctorum
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Sodalis_Coq_et_Coq/
>
> http://www.myspace.com/venator_poetus
> http://anheathenreader.blogspot.com/
> http://www.catamount-grange-hearth.org/
> http://www.cafepress.com/catamountgrange
> --
> May the Holy Powers smile on our efforts.
> May the Spirits of our family lines nod in approval.
> May we be of Worth to our fellow Nova Romans.
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66527 From: Jesse Corradino Date: 2009-06-09
Subject: Re: Intercessio!
"Those who beat the "be Roman, act Roman, follow the Romans" drum should understand that actual ancient Roman political practice was not really in any way democratic or "fair" by contemporary standards."
 
If each one of you isn't beating that drum, then what is all of this for?  Just an extended exercise in organized flame wars amongst thirty-somethings?
 


Windows Liveâ„¢: Keep your life in sync. Check it out.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66528 From: Jesse Corradino Date: 2009-06-09
Subject: Re: Another little brag. . .
Sal.
 
That sounds a lot more correct in my opinion, as the hard boiled egg is essential to the recipe :)  Lasagna, too, should have hard boiled egg done properly as well as a few other staple dishes (like pizza rustica).  
 
Just quick because I'm interested in the Italian disaspora, but are you from the mid-west somewhere?  I've read that America has a lot of northern Italians, or at least some, but they settled outside of the NY/New England area (where overwhelmingly most Italians reside.)  Every "paesano" I know is southern Italian like myself (Calarese in my case.)  The farthest north I've ever even seen is Abruzzi.
 
Best
 
> To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> From: dis_pensible@...
> Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2009 14:47:17 +0000
> Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Another little brag. . .
>
> Salvete,
>
> I think I am going to make Bracciole this weekend, I think I am now *compelled* to make it!
> Bracciole is not just Sicilian although I think most Americans are oriented to Sicilian Italian Americans because of the Media and because of the many immigrants from that beautiful area. However, my maternal grandparents from the north, Nonny (or Grandmere as we referred to her respectfully outside of family) was from the Ligurian region and Poppy (Grandpere) was from the foothills of the Italian Alps. My Paternal Grandfather was from the L'Aquila region and my maternal Grandmother was from the seaside not far from Rome. Here are other recipes for Bracciole with a bit of information, also note the different spellings- and the different ingredients:
> http://recipegal.com/Italian/Bracciole.htm
> http://italianfood.about.com/od/beefbracioleetc/Beef_Veal_Braciole_Involtini_Steaks_Etc.htm
> I use about 2 pounds of thinly sliced, enough to make approx six large thin slices, and well beaten, or tenderized round steak, 8 cloves of chopped garlic, one very thinly sliced red onion, one very thinly sliced green bell pepper, about 2/3 cup of Pecorino Romano grated cheese, approx four cups of breadcrumbs, oregano, sweet basil, salt and pepper and four sliced hard boiled eggs. Mix all the ingredients except for the eggs, spread the mixture over the meat, place the eggs on top of the breadcrumb mixture, roll them up, tuck in the ends, tie them with string. Fry them in olive oil until they are nicely browned, then toss them in huge pot of tomato sauce and let them simmer until they are super tender. This makes about six servings, more if you are serving pasta also.
> As to the regional differences all I can say is vive la différence!
>
> Valete,
> Julia
>
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Publius Ullerius Stephanus Venator <famila.ulleria.venii@...> wrote:
> >
> > Salvete;
> >
> > On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 12:26 AM, Jesse Corradino wrote:
> > >
> > > The recipe in the link looks weird to me.  My family is from Catanzaro so
> > > maybe our recipe isn't properly sicilian (which is where I think the dish
> > > comes from) so we make a different version of brazghul (phonetic sp,
> > > obviously) that consists of hard boiled eggs, romano cheese, salt, pepper,
> > > parsely, and garlic.  Have your butcher tenderize some top round cuts
> > > and roll all of the ingredients into the steak.  Tooth pick or butcher tie
> > > and simmer in lard or oil in a pan until brown.  I cook it extra with a
> > > fresh marinara after the brazghul is already browned for about a half hour
> > > or until my sauce is reduced.  My coup de grace is to serve the sauce with
> > > spinach ravioli instead of just eating the brazghul by itself.
> > >
> >
> > Regional difference: Great grandma Mastroianni (nee Riciardelli) was
> > born in Avellino, Campagna about 1891. Came to America as the result
> > of an arranged marriage. She refused to wed, as the prospective groom
> > was too short. She demanded, and got, her dowry back; found her own
> > husband. 9 of her 10 children made it to adulthood and marriages of
> > their own.
> >
> > Both Nonnie and Papa showed me how to cook; she the Camganian style of
> > her upbringing, him the Abruzzese.
> >
> > =====================================
> > In amicitia et fide
> > Publius Ullerius Stephanus Venator
> > Civis circa Quintilis MMDCCLI a.u.c.
> > Patrician, Paterfamilias
> > Religio Septentrionalis - Poeta
> >
> > Dominus Sodalitas Coquuorum et Cerevisiae Coctorum
> > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Sodalis_Coq_et_Coq/
> >
> > http://www.myspace.com/venator_poetus
> > http://anheathenreader.blogspot.com/
> > http://www.catamount-grange-hearth.org/
> > http://www.cafepress.com/catamountgrange
> > --
> > May the Holy Powers smile on our efforts.
> > May the Spirits of our family lines nod in approval.
> > May we be of Worth to our fellow Nova Romans.
> >
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
> <*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma/
>
> <*> Your email settings:
> Individual Email | Traditional
>
> <*> To change settings online go to:
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma/join
> (Yahoo! ID required)
>
> <*> To change settings via email:
> mailto:Nova-Roma-digest@yahoogroups.com
> mailto:Nova-Roma-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com
>
> <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
> <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
> http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>


Windows Liveâ„¢ SkyDriveâ„¢: Get 25 GB of free online storage. Get it on your BlackBerry or iPhone.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66529 From: Robert Levee Date: 2009-06-09
Subject: Intercessio!
Salve et salvete,

I ,Ap.Galerius Aurelianus,Tribune of the Plebs,hereby withdraw my Intercessio dated June 9th, 2009,as it was incorrectly worded.Thank You.

Vale et valete,
Ap.Galerius Aurelianus
Tribune of the Plebs
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66530 From: livia_plauta Date: 2009-06-09
Subject: Re: Another little brag. . .
Salve,
Braciole literally just means (pork) "ribs", so it's natural to find thousands of different recipes for them.
But "brazghul" looks like Turkish to me. Please! "Braciole" is pronounced "bra-cho-lay".

Vale,
Livia
>
>
> The recipe in the link looks weird to me. My family is from Catanzaro so maybe our recipe isn't properly sicilian (which is where I think the dish comes from) so we make a different version of brazghul (phonetic sp, obviously) that consists of hard boiled eggs, romano cheese, salt, pepper, parsely, and garlic. Have your butcher tenderize some top round cuts and roll all of the ingredients into the steak. Tooth pick or butcher tie and simmer in lard or oil in a pan until brown. I cook it extra with a fresh marinara after the brazghul is already browned for about a half hour or until my sauce is reduced. My coup de grace is to serve the sauce with spinach ravioli instead of just eating the brazghul by itself.
>
>
>
>
> > To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> > From: famila.ulleria.venii@...
> > Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2009 19:02:34 -0500
> > Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: Another little brag. . .
> >
> > Ave Maior;
> >
> > On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 6:06 PM, Maior<rory12001@...> wrote:
> > >
> > > Salvete Venator Juliaque;
> > > ecastor I'm hungry, I had no nonna and instead got chicken soup a poor
> > > second in my opinion to Italian cuisine;-) So thank you for sharing and I'd
> > > love more recipes from our cives. Food definitely is something we should be
> > > discussing in the forum!
> > > bene vale
> > > Maior
> > >
> > > here is the link to the NRwiki! add more recipes omnes:)
> > > http://www.novaroma.org/nr/Bracciola
> > >
> >
> > I think if you and I can keep discussions to matters of plate and cup,
> > we might just have common ground after all ,-)
> >
> > Just for you then, Nonnie D'Orazio's Zuppa Jennie (named after her
> > mother, Giovannia Mastroianni, nee Riciardelli), know elsewhere as
> > Italian Wedding Soup. . .a term I had not heard until after I'd moved
> > to Illinois in 1996, 39 years after I'd been born .-)
> >
> > Foodstuffs: 4 qt home made chicken stock, 1# ea ground chicken and
> > veal, 1/2 c dried bread - finely grated, 2 lg chicken eggs - beaten, 1
> > t ea dried oregano, basil and parsley - rubbed to small particles, 6
> > cloves garlic - crushed, 1 t ea salt and fresh-ground black pepper, 2
> > c long grain rice, 2 c ea spinach, escarole, endive and leek - coarse
> > chopped and a bowl of freshly shredded Asiago d'allevo or
> > Parmigiano-Reggiano for garnishing
> >
> > Method: While bringing the stock to a boil, mix well the ground
> > meats, bread crumbs, eggs, herbs, garlic, salt and pepper. Shape mix
> > into small balls, about the size of chestnuts. Drop a few at a time
> > into the boiling stock, so as to not reduce the temperature; cook
> > about 10 minutes. Stir in the rice and cook an additional 15 minutes.
> > Stir in the greens and cook 15 more minutes.
> >
> > Serve in a wide, shallow soup bowl with a libel sprinkling of cheese.
> >
> > Side dishes, if this is the main course; fresh baked bread with butter
> > and a mix of string beans and summer squash - steamed and dressed with
> > balsamic vinegar mixed with a bit of brown mustard.
> >
> > Vale - Venator
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------------
> >
> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Windows Live™: Keep your life in sync.
> http://windowslive.com/explore?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_BR_life_in_synch_062009
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66531 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2009-06-09
Subject: Re: Another little brag. . .
Cato Liviae Plautae sal.

Salve.

Dunno if it's regional, but in our family we always pronounced it "brazhol" with a soft buzzy "z" kind of sound. We're a mix of Avellino and Palermo, though, with a touch of some tiny mountain town in Puglia.

Vale,

Cato



--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "livia_plauta" <livia.plauta@...> wrote:
>
> Salve,
> Braciole literally just means (pork) "ribs", so it's natural to find thousands of different recipes for them.
> But "brazghul" looks like Turkish to me. Please! "Braciole" is pronounced "bra-cho-lay".
>
> Vale,
> Livia
> >
> >
> > The recipe in the link looks weird to me. My family is from Catanzaro so maybe our recipe isn't properly sicilian (which is where I think the dish comes from) so we make a different version of brazghul (phonetic sp, obviously) that consists of hard boiled eggs, romano cheese, salt, pepper, parsely, and garlic. Have your butcher tenderize some top round cuts and roll all of the ingredients into the steak. Tooth pick or butcher tie and simmer in lard or oil in a pan until brown. I cook it extra with a fresh marinara after the brazghul is already browned for about a half hour or until my sauce is reduced. My coup de grace is to serve the sauce with spinach ravioli instead of just eating the brazghul by itself.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > > To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> > > From: famila.ulleria.venii@
> > > Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2009 19:02:34 -0500
> > > Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: Another little brag. . .
> > >
> > > Ave Maior;
> > >
> > > On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 6:06 PM, Maior<rory12001@> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Salvete Venator Juliaque;
> > > > ecastor I'm hungry, I had no nonna and instead got chicken soup a poor
> > > > second in my opinion to Italian cuisine;-) So thank you for sharing and I'd
> > > > love more recipes from our cives. Food definitely is something we should be
> > > > discussing in the forum!
> > > > bene vale
> > > > Maior
> > > >
> > > > here is the link to the NRwiki! add more recipes omnes:)
> > > > http://www.novaroma.org/nr/Bracciola
> > > >
> > >
> > > I think if you and I can keep discussions to matters of plate and cup,
> > > we might just have common ground after all ,-)
> > >
> > > Just for you then, Nonnie D'Orazio's Zuppa Jennie (named after her
> > > mother, Giovannia Mastroianni, nee Riciardelli), know elsewhere as
> > > Italian Wedding Soup. . .a term I had not heard until after I'd moved
> > > to Illinois in 1996, 39 years after I'd been born .-)
> > >
> > > Foodstuffs: 4 qt home made chicken stock, 1# ea ground chicken and
> > > veal, 1/2 c dried bread - finely grated, 2 lg chicken eggs - beaten, 1
> > > t ea dried oregano, basil and parsley - rubbed to small particles, 6
> > > cloves garlic - crushed, 1 t ea salt and fresh-ground black pepper, 2
> > > c long grain rice, 2 c ea spinach, escarole, endive and leek - coarse
> > > chopped and a bowl of freshly shredded Asiago d'allevo or
> > > Parmigiano-Reggiano for garnishing
> > >
> > > Method: While bringing the stock to a boil, mix well the ground
> > > meats, bread crumbs, eggs, herbs, garlic, salt and pepper. Shape mix
> > > into small balls, about the size of chestnuts. Drop a few at a time
> > > into the boiling stock, so as to not reduce the temperature; cook
> > > about 10 minutes. Stir in the rice and cook an additional 15 minutes.
> > > Stir in the greens and cook 15 more minutes.
> > >
> > > Serve in a wide, shallow soup bowl with a libel sprinkling of cheese.
> > >
> > > Side dishes, if this is the main course; fresh baked bread with butter
> > > and a mix of string beans and summer squash - steamed and dressed with
> > > balsamic vinegar mixed with a bit of brown mustard.
> > >
> > > Vale - Venator
> > >
> > >
> > > ------------------------------------
> > >
> > > Yahoo! Groups Links
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> > _________________________________________________________________
> > Windows Live™: Keep your life in sync.
> > http://windowslive.com/explore?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_BR_life_in_synch_062009
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66532 From: Lyn Dowling Date: 2009-06-09
Subject: Re: Another little brag. . .
Salvete omnes,
 
My family eats a lot of brazhol; mannihgowt and sdrahjadel too. We also order brihzhut, mootzadel and mordadel.* ;-)
 
That's because we were raised in Northern New Jersey, with its large number of Sicilian-Americans and their linguistic shortcuts. Order "man-i-cotti" at a restaurant up there and the waiter knows you know nothing; order "mannihgowt" and he knows you're serious.  Here in white-bread-in-plastic-bag Florida, it's the opposite. Italian restaurateurs here hug you if they think you actually know what you're about to eat.
 
Now I'm hungry.
 
vale,
L. Aemilia
 
* Brasciole, manicotti, stracciatella . . . prosciutto, mozzarella and mortadella
 
PS -- Thanks for the etymology, Livia. I always thought the root for "brasciole"/"braciole" was "brasato," as in "braised."


From: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com [mailto:Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of livia_plauta
Sent: Tuesday, June 09, 2009 12:09 PM
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Another little brag. . .

Salve,
Braciole literally just means (pork) "ribs", so it's natural to find thousands of different recipes for them.
But "brazghul" looks like Turkish to me. Please! "Braciole" is pronounced "bra-cho-lay" .

Vale,
Livia
>
>
> The recipe in the link looks weird to me. My family is from Catanzaro so maybe our recipe isn't properly sicilian (which is where I think the dish comes from) so we make a different version of brazghul (phonetic sp, obviously) that consists of hard boiled eggs, romano cheese, salt, pepper, parsely, and garlic. Have your butcher tenderize some top round cuts and roll all of the ingredients into the steak. Tooth pick or butcher tie and simmer in lard or oil in a pan until brown. I cook it extra with a fresh marinara after the brazghul is already browned for about a half hour or until my sauce is reduced. My coup de grace is to serve the sauce with spinach ravioli instead of just eating the brazghul by itself.
>
>
>
>
> > To: Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com
> > From: famila.ulleria. venii@...
> > Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2009 19:02:34 -0500
> > Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: Another little brag. . .
> >
> > Ave Maior;
> >
> > On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 6:06 PM, Maior<rory12001@ ...> wrote:
> > >
> > > Salvete Venator Juliaque;
> > > ecastor I'm hungry, I had no nonna and instead got chicken soup a poor
> > > second in my opinion to Italian cuisine;-) So thank you for sharing and I'd
> > > love more recipes from our cives. Food definitely is something we should be
> > > discussing in the forum!
> > > bene vale
> > > Maior
> > >
> > > here is the link to the NRwiki! add more recipes omnes:)
> > > http://www.novaroma .org/nr/Bracciol a
> > >
> >
> > I think if you and I can keep discussions to matters of plate and cup,
> > we might just have common ground after all ,-)
> >
> > Just for you then, Nonnie D'Orazio's Zuppa Jennie (named after her
> > mother, Giovannia Mastroianni, nee Riciardelli) , know elsewhere as
> > Italian Wedding Soup. . .a term I had not heard until after I'd moved
> > to Illinois in 1996, 39 years after I'd been born .-)
> >
> > Foodstuffs: 4 qt home made chicken stock, 1# ea ground chicken and
> > veal, 1/2 c dried bread - finely grated, 2 lg chicken eggs - beaten, 1
> > t ea dried oregano, basil and parsley - rubbed to small particles, 6
> > cloves garlic - crushed, 1 t ea salt and fresh-ground black pepper, 2
> > c long grain rice, 2 c ea spinach, escarole, endive and leek - coarse
> > chopped and a bowl of freshly shredded Asiago d'allevo or
> > Parmigiano-Reggiano for garnishing
> >
> > Method: While bringing the stock to a boil, mix well the ground
> > meats, bread crumbs, eggs, herbs, garlic, salt and pepper. Shape mix
> > into small balls, about the size of chestnuts. Drop a few at a time
> > into the boiling stock, so as to not reduce the temperature; cook
> > about 10 minutes. Stir in the rice and cook an additional 15 minutes.
> > Stir in the greens and cook 15 more minutes.
> >
> > Serve in a wide, shallow soup bowl with a libel sprinkling of cheese.
> >
> > Side dishes, if this is the main course; fresh baked bread with butter
> > and a mix of string beans and summer squash - steamed and dressed with
> > balsamic vinegar mixed with a bit of brown mustard.
> >
> > Vale - Venator
> >
> >
> > ------------ --------- --------- ------
> >
> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
>
> ____________ _________ _________ _________ _________ _________ _
> Windows Live™: Keep your life in sync.
> http://windowslive. com/explore? ocid=TXT_ TAGLM_WL_ BR_life_in_ synch_062009
>

No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 8.5.339 / Virus Database: 270.12.59/2165 - Release Date: 06/09/09 05:53:00

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66533 From: L Julia Aquila Date: 2009-06-09
Subject: Re: Another little brag. . .
Salve!

I am having a bit of a problem posting, keep getting errors, so I will try this again.
Nonononono, I cannot abide hard boiled eggs in Lasagna*laugh* however I will concede to using eggs in the preparation of the ricotta for the Lasagna. My famiglia makes a very plain Lasagna: Lasagna noodles, Ricotta, Pecorino Roman, lots of Mozzarella, Tomato Meat sauce, garlic, oregano, basil and pepper. Although I have blasphemed and added mushrooms. Our usual cuisine did not include a lot of pasta but well seasoned meats and fresh vegetables that were mostly roasted, broiled or baked.
My Grandfather's settled in NYC when they were very young in the late 1800's then later married and raised their families on Long Island, Nassau County although we do have relatives in Suffolk. We also have relatives out West also. I am, alas, a native New Yorker, one of the many Italoamericani.
Even though many immigrants were from Naples and Sicily, Liguria and Veneto followed in the statistics. Many reasons for immigration including political. I am not so sure why Naples tops Sicily except perhaps this was due to the fact that Naples was the port of departure for many immigrants in other parts of Italy. Others left Italy from France. Not all came through Ellis Island either as was the case with some of my ancestors.
It always so nice to speak with people of similar heritage, we come from such a rich history and culture.

Vale,
Julia

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Jesse Corradino <woden66@...> wrote:
>
>
> Sal.
>
>
>
> That sounds a lot more correct in my opinion, as the hard boiled egg is essential to the recipe :) Lasagna, too, should have hard boiled egg done properly as well as a few other staple dishes (like pizza rustica).
>
>
>
> Just quick because I'm interested in the Italian disaspora, but are you from the mid-west somewhere? I've read that America has a lot of northern Italians, or at least some, but they settled outside of the NY/New England area (where overwhelmingly most Italians reside.) Every "paesano" I know is southern Italian like myself (Calarese in my case.) The farthest north I've ever even seen is Abruzzi.
>
>
>
> Best
>
> > To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> > From: dis_pensible@...
> > Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2009 14:47:17 +0000
> > Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Another little brag. . .
> >
> > Salvete,
> >
> > I think I am going to make Bracciole this weekend, I think I am now *compelled* to make it!
> > Bracciole is not just Sicilian although I think most Americans are oriented to Sicilian Italian Americans because of the Media and because of the many immigrants from that beautiful area. However, my maternal grandparents from the north, Nonny (or Grandmere as we referred to her respectfully outside of family) was from the Ligurian region and Poppy (Grandpere) was from the foothills of the Italian Alps. My Paternal Grandfather was from the L'Aquila region and my maternal Grandmother was from the seaside not far from Rome. Here are other recipes for Bracciole with a bit of information, also note the different spellings- and the different ingredients:
> > http://recipegal.com/Italian/Bracciole.htm
> > http://italianfood.about.com/od/beefbracioleetc/Beef_Veal_Braciole_Involtini_Steaks_Etc.htm
> > I use about 2 pounds of thinly sliced, enough to make approx six large thin slices, and well beaten, or tenderized round steak, 8 cloves of chopped garlic, one very thinly sliced red onion, one very thinly sliced green bell pepper, about 2/3 cup of Pecorino Romano grated cheese, approx four cups of breadcrumbs, oregano, sweet basil, salt and pepper and four sliced hard boiled eggs. Mix all the ingredients except for the eggs, spread the mixture over the meat, place the eggs on top of the breadcrumb mixture, roll them up, tuck in the ends, tie them with string. Fry them in olive oil until they are nicely browned, then toss them in huge pot of tomato sauce and let them simmer until they are super tender. This makes about six servings, more if you are serving pasta also.
> > As to the regional differences all I can say is vive la différence!
> >
> > Valete,
> > Julia
> >
> >
> > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Publius Ullerius Stephanus Venator <famila.ulleria.venii@> wrote:
> > >
> > > Salvete;
> > >
> > > On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 12:26 AM, Jesse Corradino wrote:
> > > >
> > > > The recipe in the link looks weird to me. My family is from Catanzaro so
> > > > maybe our recipe isn't properly sicilian (which is where I think the dish
> > > > comes from) so we make a different version of brazghul (phonetic sp,
> > > > obviously) that consists of hard boiled eggs, romano cheese, salt, pepper,
> > > > parsely, and garlic. Have your butcher tenderize some top round cuts
> > > > and roll all of the ingredients into the steak. Tooth pick or butcher tie
> > > > and simmer in lard or oil in a pan until brown. I cook it extra with a
> > > > fresh marinara after the brazghul is already browned for about a half hour
> > > > or until my sauce is reduced. My coup de grace is to serve the sauce with
> > > > spinach ravioli instead of just eating the brazghul by itself.
> > > >
> > >
> > > Regional difference: Great grandma Mastroianni (nee Riciardelli) was
> > > born in Avellino, Campagna about 1891. Came to America as the result
> > > of an arranged marriage. She refused to wed, as the prospective groom
> > > was too short. She demanded, and got, her dowry back; found her own
> > > husband. 9 of her 10 children made it to adulthood and marriages of
> > > their own.
> > >
> > > Both Nonnie and Papa showed me how to cook; she the Camganian style of
> > > her upbringing, him the Abruzzese.
> > >
> > > =====================================
> > > In amicitia et fide
> > > Publius Ullerius Stephanus Venator
> > > Civis circa Quintilis MMDCCLI a.u.c.
> > > Patrician, Paterfamilias
> > > Religio Septentrionalis - Poeta
> > >
> > > Dominus Sodalitas Coquuorum et Cerevisiae Coctorum
> > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Sodalis_Coq_et_Coq/
> > >
> > > http://www.myspace.com/venator_poetus
> > > http://anheathenreader.blogspot.com/
> > > http://www.catamount-grange-hearth.org/
> > > http://www.cafepress.com/catamountgrange
> > > --
> > > May the Holy Powers smile on our efforts.
> > > May the Spirits of our family lines nod in approval.
> > > May we be of Worth to our fellow Nova Romans.
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------------
> >
> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Windows Live™ SkyDrive™: Get 25 GB of free online storage.
> http://windowslive.com/online/skydrive?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_SD_25GB_062009
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66534 From: L Julia Aquila Date: 2009-06-09
Subject: Re: Another little brag. . .
Salve Amelia,

Ack!!! *laughs* Ok I got most of them but what is "sdrahjadel." Ok how do you say Mozzarella? Matzarella, Mootsarella or Mootsarell?
I am so wishing for a plateful of what you just said;)
If you think Florida is bad, come to Nashville. We have one decent Italian restaurant that has an actual Italian chef. The others are either chains or something resembling Italian. I am not even going to get into the pronunciation...

Vale,
Julia

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Lyn Dowling" <ldowling@...> wrote:
>
> Salvete omnes,
>
> My family eats a lot of brazhol; mannihgowt and sdrahjadel too. We also
> order brihzhut, mootzadel and mordadel.* ;-)
>
> That's because we were raised in Northern New Jersey, with its large number
> of Sicilian-Americans and their linguistic shortcuts. Order "man-i-cotti" at
> a restaurant up there and the waiter knows you know nothing; order
> "mannihgowt" and he knows you're serious. Here in
> white-bread-in-plastic-bag Florida, it's the opposite. Italian restaurateurs
> here hug you if they think you actually know what you're about to eat.
>
> Now I'm hungry.
>
> vale,
> L. Aemilia
>
> * Brasciole, manicotti, stracciatella . . . prosciutto, mozzarella and
> mortadella
>
> PS -- Thanks for the etymology, Livia. I always thought the root for
> "brasciole"/"braciole" was "brasato," as in "braised."
>
>
> _____
>
> From: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com [mailto:Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf
> Of livia_plauta
> Sent: Tuesday, June 09, 2009 12:09 PM
> To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Another little brag. . .
>
>
>
>
>
> Salve,
> Braciole literally just means (pork) "ribs", so it's natural to find
> thousands of different recipes for them.
> But "brazghul" looks like Turkish to me. Please! "Braciole" is pronounced
> "bra-cho-lay".
>
> Vale,
> Livia
> >
> >
> > The recipe in the link looks weird to me. My family is from Catanzaro so
> maybe our recipe isn't properly sicilian (which is where I think the dish
> comes from) so we make a different version of brazghul (phonetic sp,
> obviously) that consists of hard boiled eggs, romano cheese, salt, pepper,
> parsely, and garlic. Have your butcher tenderize some top round cuts and
> roll all of the ingredients into the steak. Tooth pick or butcher tie and
> simmer in lard or oil in a pan until brown. I cook it extra with a fresh
> marinara after the brazghul is already browned for about a half hour or
> until my sauce is reduced. My coup de grace is to serve the sauce with
> spinach ravioli instead of just eating the brazghul by itself.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > > To: Nova-Roma@yahoogrou <mailto:Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com> ps.com
> > > From: famila.ulleria.venii@
> > > Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2009 19:02:34 -0500
> > > Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: Another little brag. . .
> > >
> > > Ave Maior;
> > >
> > > On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 6:06 PM, Maior<rory12001@> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Salvete Venator Juliaque;
> > > > ecastor I'm hungry, I had no nonna and instead got chicken soup a poor
> > > > second in my opinion to Italian cuisine;-) So thank you for sharing
> and I'd
> > > > love more recipes from our cives. Food definitely is something we
> should be
> > > > discussing in the forum!
> > > > bene vale
> > > > Maior
> > > >
> > > > here is the link to the NRwiki! add more recipes omnes:)
> > > > http://www.novaroma <http://www.novaroma.org/nr/Bracciola>
> .org/nr/Bracciola
> > > >
> > >
> > > I think if you and I can keep discussions to matters of plate and cup,
> > > we might just have common ground after all ,-)
> > >
> > > Just for you then, Nonnie D'Orazio's Zuppa Jennie (named after her
> > > mother, Giovannia Mastroianni, nee Riciardelli), know elsewhere as
> > > Italian Wedding Soup. . .a term I had not heard until after I'd moved
> > > to Illinois in 1996, 39 years after I'd been born .-)
> > >
> > > Foodstuffs: 4 qt home made chicken stock, 1# ea ground chicken and
> > > veal, 1/2 c dried bread - finely grated, 2 lg chicken eggs - beaten, 1
> > > t ea dried oregano, basil and parsley - rubbed to small particles, 6
> > > cloves garlic - crushed, 1 t ea salt and fresh-ground black pepper, 2
> > > c long grain rice, 2 c ea spinach, escarole, endive and leek - coarse
> > > chopped and a bowl of freshly shredded Asiago d'allevo or
> > > Parmigiano-Reggiano for garnishing
> > >
> > > Method: While bringing the stock to a boil, mix well the ground
> > > meats, bread crumbs, eggs, herbs, garlic, salt and pepper. Shape mix
> > > into small balls, about the size of chestnuts. Drop a few at a time
> > > into the boiling stock, so as to not reduce the temperature; cook
> > > about 10 minutes. Stir in the rice and cook an additional 15 minutes.
> > > Stir in the greens and cook 15 more minutes.
> > >
> > > Serve in a wide, shallow soup bowl with a libel sprinkling of cheese.
> > >
> > > Side dishes, if this is the main course; fresh baked bread with butter
> > > and a mix of string beans and summer squash - steamed and dressed with
> > > balsamic vinegar mixed with a bit of brown mustard.
> > >
> > > Vale - Venator
> > >
> > >
> > > ------------------------------------
> > >
> > > Yahoo! Groups Links
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> > __________________________________________________________
> > Windows LiveT: Keep your life in sync.
> > http://windowslive.
> <http://windowslive.com/explore?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_BR_life_in_synch_062009>
> com/explore?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_BR_life_in_synch_062009
> >
>
>
>
>
>
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> Version: 8.5.339 / Virus Database: 270.12.59/2165 - Release Date: 06/09/09
> 05:53:00
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66535 From: livia_plauta Date: 2009-06-09
Subject: Re: Another little brag. . .
Salvete,
but which planet do you live on? Lasagna needs hard boiled egg like a fish needs a bicycle!

Valete,
Livia
>
>
> Sal.
>
>
>
> That sounds a lot more correct in my opinion, as the hard boiled egg is essential to the recipe :) Lasagna, too, should have hard boiled egg done properly as well as a few other staple dishes (like pizza rustica).
>
>
>
> Just quick because I'm interested in the Italian disaspora, but are you from the mid-west somewhere? I've read that America has a lot of northern Italians, or at least some, but they settled outside of the NY/New England area (where overwhelmingly most Italians reside.) Every "paesano" I know is southern Italian like myself (Calarese in my case.) The farthest north I've ever even seen is Abruzzi.
>
>
>
> Best
>
> > To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> > From: dis_pensible@...
> > Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2009 14:47:17 +0000
> > Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Another little brag. . .
> >
> > Salvete,
> >
> > I think I am going to make Bracciole this weekend, I think I am now *compelled* to make it!
> > Bracciole is not just Sicilian although I think most Americans are oriented to Sicilian Italian Americans because of the Media and because of the many immigrants from that beautiful area. However, my maternal grandparents from the north, Nonny (or Grandmere as we referred to her respectfully outside of family) was from the Ligurian region and Poppy (Grandpere) was from the foothills of the Italian Alps. My Paternal Grandfather was from the L'Aquila region and my maternal Grandmother was from the seaside not far from Rome. Here are other recipes for Bracciole with a bit of information, also note the different spellings- and the different ingredients:
> > http://recipegal.com/Italian/Bracciole.htm
> > http://italianfood.about.com/od/beefbracioleetc/Beef_Veal_Braciole_Involtini_Steaks_Etc.htm
> > I use about 2 pounds of thinly sliced, enough to make approx six large thin slices, and well beaten, or tenderized round steak, 8 cloves of chopped garlic, one very thinly sliced red onion, one very thinly sliced green bell pepper, about 2/3 cup of Pecorino Romano grated cheese, approx four cups of breadcrumbs, oregano, sweet basil, salt and pepper and four sliced hard boiled eggs. Mix all the ingredients except for the eggs, spread the mixture over the meat, place the eggs on top of the breadcrumb mixture, roll them up, tuck in the ends, tie them with string. Fry them in olive oil until they are nicely browned, then toss them in huge pot of tomato sauce and let them simmer until they are super tender. This makes about six servings, more if you are serving pasta also.
> > As to the regional differences all I can say is vive la différence!
> >
> > Valete,
> > Julia
> >
> >
> > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Publius Ullerius Stephanus Venator <famila.ulleria.venii@> wrote:
> > >
> > > Salvete;
> > >
> > > On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 12:26 AM, Jesse Corradino wrote:
> > > >
> > > > The recipe in the link looks weird to me. My family is from Catanzaro so
> > > > maybe our recipe isn't properly sicilian (which is where I think the dish
> > > > comes from) so we make a different version of brazghul (phonetic sp,
> > > > obviously) that consists of hard boiled eggs, romano cheese, salt, pepper,
> > > > parsely, and garlic. Have your butcher tenderize some top round cuts
> > > > and roll all of the ingredients into the steak. Tooth pick or butcher tie
> > > > and simmer in lard or oil in a pan until brown. I cook it extra with a
> > > > fresh marinara after the brazghul is already browned for about a half hour
> > > > or until my sauce is reduced. My coup de grace is to serve the sauce with
> > > > spinach ravioli instead of just eating the brazghul by itself.
> > > >
> > >
> > > Regional difference: Great grandma Mastroianni (nee Riciardelli) was
> > > born in Avellino, Campagna about 1891. Came to America as the result
> > > of an arranged marriage. She refused to wed, as the prospective groom
> > > was too short. She demanded, and got, her dowry back; found her own
> > > husband. 9 of her 10 children made it to adulthood and marriages of
> > > their own.
> > >
> > > Both Nonnie and Papa showed me how to cook; she the Camganian style of
> > > her upbringing, him the Abruzzese.
> > >
> > > =====================================
> > > In amicitia et fide
> > > Publius Ullerius Stephanus Venator
> > > Civis circa Quintilis MMDCCLI a.u.c.
> > > Patrician, Paterfamilias
> > > Religio Septentrionalis - Poeta
> > >
> > > Dominus Sodalitas Coquuorum et Cerevisiae Coctorum
> > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Sodalis_Coq_et_Coq/
> > >
> > > http://www.myspace.com/venator_poetus
> > > http://anheathenreader.blogspot.com/
> > > http://www.catamount-grange-hearth.org/
> > > http://www.cafepress.com/catamountgrange
> > > --
> > > May the Holy Powers smile on our efforts.
> > > May the Spirits of our family lines nod in approval.
> > > May we be of Worth to our fellow Nova Romans.
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------------
> >
> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Windows Live™ SkyDrive™: Get 25 GB of free online storage.
> http://windowslive.com/online/skydrive?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_SD_25GB_062009
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66536 From: livia_plauta Date: 2009-06-09
Subject: Re: Another little brag. . .
Livia Plauta Catoni sal.
I think you people are mixes of American, American and American. All the Italo-americans here would need a long holiday in the motherland, tied with a language course. I know good and cheap courses in Reggio Calabria.

Vale,
Livia

>
> Cato Liviae Plautae sal.
>
> Salve.
>
> Dunno if it's regional, but in our family we always pronounced it "brazhol" with a soft buzzy "z" kind of sound. We're a mix of Avellino and Palermo, though, with a touch of some tiny mountain town in Puglia.
>
> Vale,
>
> Cato
>
>
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "livia_plauta" <livia.plauta@> wrote:
> >
> > Salve,
> > Braciole literally just means (pork) "ribs", so it's natural to find thousands of different recipes for them.
> > But "brazghul" looks like Turkish to me. Please! "Braciole" is pronounced "bra-cho-lay".
> >
> > Vale,
> > Livia
> > >
> > >
> > > The recipe in the link looks weird to me. My family is from Catanzaro so maybe our recipe isn't properly sicilian (which is where I think the dish comes from) so we make a different version of brazghul (phonetic sp, obviously) that consists of hard boiled eggs, romano cheese, salt, pepper, parsely, and garlic. Have your butcher tenderize some top round cuts and roll all of the ingredients into the steak. Tooth pick or butcher tie and simmer in lard or oil in a pan until brown. I cook it extra with a fresh marinara after the brazghul is already browned for about a half hour or until my sauce is reduced. My coup de grace is to serve the sauce with spinach ravioli instead of just eating the brazghul by itself.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > > To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> > > > From: famila.ulleria.venii@
> > > > Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2009 19:02:34 -0500
> > > > Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: Another little brag. . .
> > > >
> > > > Ave Maior;
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 6:06 PM, Maior<rory12001@> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Salvete Venator Juliaque;
> > > > > ecastor I'm hungry, I had no nonna and instead got chicken soup a poor
> > > > > second in my opinion to Italian cuisine;-) So thank you for sharing and I'd
> > > > > love more recipes from our cives. Food definitely is something we should be
> > > > > discussing in the forum!
> > > > > bene vale
> > > > > Maior
> > > > >
> > > > > here is the link to the NRwiki! add more recipes omnes:)
> > > > > http://www.novaroma.org/nr/Bracciola
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > I think if you and I can keep discussions to matters of plate and cup,
> > > > we might just have common ground after all ,-)
> > > >
> > > > Just for you then, Nonnie D'Orazio's Zuppa Jennie (named after her
> > > > mother, Giovannia Mastroianni, nee Riciardelli), know elsewhere as
> > > > Italian Wedding Soup. . .a term I had not heard until after I'd moved
> > > > to Illinois in 1996, 39 years after I'd been born .-)
> > > >
> > > > Foodstuffs: 4 qt home made chicken stock, 1# ea ground chicken and
> > > > veal, 1/2 c dried bread - finely grated, 2 lg chicken eggs - beaten, 1
> > > > t ea dried oregano, basil and parsley - rubbed to small particles, 6
> > > > cloves garlic - crushed, 1 t ea salt and fresh-ground black pepper, 2
> > > > c long grain rice, 2 c ea spinach, escarole, endive and leek - coarse
> > > > chopped and a bowl of freshly shredded Asiago d'allevo or
> > > > Parmigiano-Reggiano for garnishing
> > > >
> > > > Method: While bringing the stock to a boil, mix well the ground
> > > > meats, bread crumbs, eggs, herbs, garlic, salt and pepper. Shape mix
> > > > into small balls, about the size of chestnuts. Drop a few at a time
> > > > into the boiling stock, so as to not reduce the temperature; cook
> > > > about 10 minutes. Stir in the rice and cook an additional 15 minutes.
> > > > Stir in the greens and cook 15 more minutes.
> > > >
> > > > Serve in a wide, shallow soup bowl with a libel sprinkling of cheese.
> > > >
> > > > Side dishes, if this is the main course; fresh baked bread with butter
> > > > and a mix of string beans and summer squash - steamed and dressed with
> > > > balsamic vinegar mixed with a bit of brown mustard.
> > > >
> > > > Vale - Venator
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > ------------------------------------
> > > >
> > > > Yahoo! Groups Links
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > > _________________________________________________________________
> > > Windows Live™: Keep your life in sync.
> > > http://windowslive.com/explore?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_BR_life_in_synch_062009
> > >
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66537 From: L Julia Aquila Date: 2009-06-09
Subject: Re: Another little brag. . .
Salve Livia,

In America you just might see a fish on bicycle *laugh* Ever hear the phrase "Only in America"?

Vale
Julia

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "livia_plauta" <livia.plauta@...> wrote:
>
> Salvete,
> but which planet do you live on? Lasagna needs hard boiled egg like a fish needs a bicycle!
>
> Valete,
> Livia
> >
> >
> > Sal.
> >
> >
> >
> > That sounds a lot more correct in my opinion, as the hard boiled egg is essential to the recipe :) Lasagna, too, should have hard boiled egg done properly as well as a few other staple dishes (like pizza rustica).
> >
> >
> >
> > Just quick because I'm interested in the Italian disaspora, but are you from the mid-west somewhere? I've read that America has a lot of northern Italians, or at least some, but they settled outside of the NY/New England area (where overwhelmingly most Italians reside.) Every "paesano" I know is southern Italian like myself (Calarese in my case.) The farthest north I've ever even seen is Abruzzi.
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66538 From: Lyn Dowling Date: 2009-06-09
Subject: Re: Another little brag. . .
Ave, Livia, friend and wit.
 
Absolutely!
 
vale,
L.Aemilia


From: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com [mailto:Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of livia_plauta
Sent: Tuesday, June 09, 2009 1:15 PM
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Another little brag. . .

Livia Plauta Catoni sal.
I think you people are mixes of American, American and American. All the Italo-americans here would need a long holiday in the motherland, tied with a language course. I know good and cheap courses in Reggio Calabria.

Vale,
Livia

>
> Cato Liviae Plautae sal.
>
> Salve.
>
> Dunno if it's regional, but in our family we always pronounced it "brazhol" with a soft buzzy "z" kind of sound. We're a mix of Avellino and Palermo, though, with a touch of some tiny mountain town in Puglia.
>
> Vale,
>
> Cato
>
>
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com, "livia_plauta" <livia.plauta@ > wrote:
> >
> > Salve,
> > Braciole literally just means (pork) "ribs", so it's natural to find thousands of different recipes for them.
> > But "brazghul" looks like Turkish to me. Please! "Braciole" is pronounced "bra-cho-lay" .
> >
> > Vale,
> > Livia
> > >
> > >
> > > The recipe in the link looks weird to me. My family is from Catanzaro so maybe our recipe isn't properly sicilian (which is where I think the dish comes from) so we make a different version of brazghul (phonetic sp, obviously) that consists of hard boiled eggs, romano cheese, salt, pepper, parsely, and garlic. Have your butcher tenderize some top round cuts and roll all of the ingredients into the steak. Tooth pick or butcher tie and simmer in lard or oil in a pan until brown. I cook it extra with a fresh marinara after the brazghul is already browned for about a half hour or until my sauce is reduced. My coup de grace is to serve the sauce with spinach ravioli instead of just eating the brazghul by itself.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > > To: Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com
> > > > From: famila.ulleria. venii@
> > > > Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2009 19:02:34 -0500
> > > > Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: Another little brag. . .
> > > >
> > > > Ave Maior;
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 6:06 PM, Maior<rory12001@ > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Salvete Venator Juliaque;
> > > > > ecastor I'm hungry, I had no nonna and instead got chicken soup a poor
> > > > > second in my opinion to Italian cuisine;-) So thank you for sharing and I'd
> > > > > love more recipes from our cives. Food definitely is something we should be
> > > > > discussing in the forum!
> > > > > bene vale
> > > > > Maior
> > > > >
> > > > > here is the link to the NRwiki! add more recipes omnes:)
> > > > > http://www.novaroma .org/nr/Bracciol a
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > I think if you and I can keep discussions to matters of plate and cup,
> > > > we might just have common ground after all ,-)
> > > >
> > > > Just for you then, Nonnie D'Orazio's Zuppa Jennie (named after her
> > > > mother, Giovannia Mastroianni, nee Riciardelli) , know elsewhere as
> > > > Italian Wedding Soup. . .a term I had not heard until after I'd moved
> > > > to Illinois in 1996, 39 years after I'd been born .-)
> > > >
> > > > Foodstuffs: 4 qt home made chicken stock, 1# ea ground chicken and
> > > > veal, 1/2 c dried bread - finely grated, 2 lg chicken eggs - beaten, 1
> > > > t ea dried oregano, basil and parsley - rubbed to small particles, 6
> > > > cloves garlic - crushed, 1 t ea salt and fresh-ground black pepper, 2
> > > > c long grain rice, 2 c ea spinach, escarole, endive and leek - coarse
> > > > chopped and a bowl of freshly shredded Asiago d'allevo or
> > > > Parmigiano-Reggiano for garnishing
> > > >
> > > > Method: While bringing the stock to a boil, mix well the ground
> > > > meats, bread crumbs, eggs, herbs, garlic, salt and pepper. Shape mix
> > > > into small balls, about the size of chestnuts. Drop a few at a time
> > > > into the boiling stock, so as to not reduce the temperature; cook
> > > > about 10 minutes. Stir in the rice and cook an additional 15 minutes.
> > > > Stir in the greens and cook 15 more minutes.
> > > >
> > > > Serve in a wide, shallow soup bowl with a libel sprinkling of cheese.
> > > >
> > > > Side dishes, if this is the main course; fresh baked bread with butter
> > > > and a mix of string beans and summer squash - steamed and dressed with
> > > > balsamic vinegar mixed with a bit of brown mustard.
> > > >
> > > > Vale - Venator
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > ------------ --------- --------- ------
> > > >
> > > > Yahoo! Groups Links
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > > ____________ _________ _________ _________ _________ _________ _
> > > Windows Live™: Keep your life in sync.
> > > http://windowslive. com/explore? ocid=TXT_ TAGLM_WL_ BR_life_in_ synch_062009
> > >
> >
>

No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 8.5.339 / Virus Database: 270.12.59/2165 - Release Date: 06/09/09 05:53:00

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66539 From: livia_plauta Date: 2009-06-09
Subject: Re: Another little brag. . .
Salve Aemilia,
I have to admit I was in panic until I found the translation below. LOL!

Actually I hadn't given an etymology for "braciole", but now that you ask I looked it up, and it comes from "brace" (ash), which in turn comes from Northern Italian "brasa", coming from a germanic word *brasa. Brasato also comes from the same root, but for that the Northern Italian origin is self-evident because of the voiced "s".

Vale,
Livia
>
> Salvete omnes,
>
> My family eats a lot of brazhol; mannihgowt and sdrahjadel too. We also
> order brihzhut, mootzadel and mordadel.* ;-)
>
> That's because we were raised in Northern New Jersey, with its large number
> of Sicilian-Americans and their linguistic shortcuts. Order "man-i-cotti" at
> a restaurant up there and the waiter knows you know nothing; order
> "mannihgowt" and he knows you're serious. Here in
> white-bread-in-plastic-bag Florida, it's the opposite. Italian restaurateurs
> here hug you if they think you actually know what you're about to eat.
>
> Now I'm hungry.
>
> vale,
> L. Aemilia
>
> * Brasciole, manicotti, stracciatella . . . prosciutto, mozzarella and
> mortadella
>
> PS -- Thanks for the etymology, Livia. I always thought the root for
> "brasciole"/"braciole" was "brasato," as in "braised."
>
>
> _____
>
> From: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com [mailto:Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf
> Of livia_plauta
> Sent: Tuesday, June 09, 2009 12:09 PM
> To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Another little brag. . .
>
>
>
>
>
> Salve,
> Braciole literally just means (pork) "ribs", so it's natural to find
> thousands of different recipes for them.
> But "brazghul" looks like Turkish to me. Please! "Braciole" is pronounced
> "bra-cho-lay".
>
> Vale,
> Livia
> >
> >
> > The recipe in the link looks weird to me. My family is from Catanzaro so
> maybe our recipe isn't properly sicilian (which is where I think the dish
> comes from) so we make a different version of brazghul (phonetic sp,
> obviously) that consists of hard boiled eggs, romano cheese, salt, pepper,
> parsely, and garlic. Have your butcher tenderize some top round cuts and
> roll all of the ingredients into the steak. Tooth pick or butcher tie and
> simmer in lard or oil in a pan until brown. I cook it extra with a fresh
> marinara after the brazghul is already browned for about a half hour or
> until my sauce is reduced. My coup de grace is to serve the sauce with
> spinach ravioli instead of just eating the brazghul by itself.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > > To: Nova-Roma@yahoogrou <mailto:Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com> ps.com
> > > From: famila.ulleria.venii@
> > > Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2009 19:02:34 -0500
> > > Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: Another little brag. . .
> > >
> > > Ave Maior;
> > >
> > > On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 6:06 PM, Maior<rory12001@> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Salvete Venator Juliaque;
> > > > ecastor I'm hungry, I had no nonna and instead got chicken soup a poor
> > > > second in my opinion to Italian cuisine;-) So thank you for sharing
> and I'd
> > > > love more recipes from our cives. Food definitely is something we
> should be
> > > > discussing in the forum!
> > > > bene vale
> > > > Maior
> > > >
> > > > here is the link to the NRwiki! add more recipes omnes:)
> > > > http://www.novaroma <http://www.novaroma.org/nr/Bracciola>
> .org/nr/Bracciola
> > > >
> > >
> > > I think if you and I can keep discussions to matters of plate and cup,
> > > we might just have common ground after all ,-)
> > >
> > > Just for you then, Nonnie D'Orazio's Zuppa Jennie (named after her
> > > mother, Giovannia Mastroianni, nee Riciardelli), know elsewhere as
> > > Italian Wedding Soup. . .a term I had not heard until after I'd moved
> > > to Illinois in 1996, 39 years after I'd been born .-)
> > >
> > > Foodstuffs: 4 qt home made chicken stock, 1# ea ground chicken and
> > > veal, 1/2 c dried bread - finely grated, 2 lg chicken eggs - beaten, 1
> > > t ea dried oregano, basil and parsley - rubbed to small particles, 6
> > > cloves garlic - crushed, 1 t ea salt and fresh-ground black pepper, 2
> > > c long grain rice, 2 c ea spinach, escarole, endive and leek - coarse
> > > chopped and a bowl of freshly shredded Asiago d'allevo or
> > > Parmigiano-Reggiano for garnishing
> > >
> > > Method: While bringing the stock to a boil, mix well the ground
> > > meats, bread crumbs, eggs, herbs, garlic, salt and pepper. Shape mix
> > > into small balls, about the size of chestnuts. Drop a few at a time
> > > into the boiling stock, so as to not reduce the temperature; cook
> > > about 10 minutes. Stir in the rice and cook an additional 15 minutes.
> > > Stir in the greens and cook 15 more minutes.
> > >
> > > Serve in a wide, shallow soup bowl with a libel sprinkling of cheese.
> > >
> > > Side dishes, if this is the main course; fresh baked bread with butter
> > > and a mix of string beans and summer squash - steamed and dressed with
> > > balsamic vinegar mixed with a bit of brown mustard.
> > >
> > > Vale - Venator
> > >
> > >
> > > ------------------------------------
> > >
> > > Yahoo! Groups Links
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> > __________________________________________________________
> > Windows LiveT: Keep your life in sync.
> > http://windowslive.
> <http://windowslive.com/explore?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_BR_life_in_synch_062009>
> com/explore?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_BR_life_in_synch_062009
> >
>
>
>
>
>
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> Version: 8.5.339 / Virus Database: 270.12.59/2165 - Release Date: 06/09/09
> 05:53:00
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66540 From: Lyn Dowling Date: 2009-06-09
Subject: Re: Another little brag. . .
Salve, Julia,
 
Stracciatelle/stracciatella is the wonderful Italian version of egg drop soup.
 
I'll grant you, things are not that bad here, culinary wise. We are growing up. But Italian-wise? We transplants would kill for a loaf of good bread.
 
vale,
L. Aemilia
(trying to write a food story this minute)


From: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com [mailto:Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of L Julia Aquila
Sent: Tuesday, June 09, 2009 1:05 PM
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Another little brag. . .

Salve Amelia,

Ack!!! *laughs* Ok I got most of them but what is "sdrahjadel. " Ok how do you say Mozzarella? Matzarella, Mootsarella or Mootsarell?
I am so wishing for a plateful of what you just said;)
If you think Florida is bad, come to Nashville. We have one decent Italian restaurant that has an actual Italian chef. The others are either chains or something resembling Italian. I am not even going to get into the pronunciation. ..

Vale,
Julia

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com, "Lyn Dowling" <ldowling@.. .> wrote:
>
> Salvete omnes,
>
> My family eats a lot of brazhol; mannihgowt and sdrahjadel too. We also
> order brihzhut, mootzadel and mordadel.* ;-)
>
> That's because we were raised in Northern New Jersey, with its large number
> of Sicilian-Americans and their linguistic shortcuts. Order "man-i-cotti" at
> a restaurant up there and the waiter knows you know nothing; order
> "mannihgowt" and he knows you're serious. Here in
> white-bread- in-plastic- bag Florida, it's the opposite. Italian restaurateurs
> here hug you if they think you actually know what you're about to eat.
>
> Now I'm hungry.
>
> vale,
> L. Aemilia
>
> * Brasciole, manicotti, stracciatella . . . prosciutto, mozzarella and
> mortadella
>
> PS -- Thanks for the etymology, Livia. I always thought the root for
> "brasciole"/ "braciole" was "brasato," as in "braised."
>
>
> _____
>
> From: Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com [mailto:Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com] On Behalf
> Of livia_plauta
> Sent: Tuesday, June 09, 2009 12:09 PM
> To: Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com
> Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Another little brag. . .
>
>
>
>
>
> Salve,
> Braciole literally just means (pork) "ribs", so it's natural to find
> thousands of different recipes for them.
> But "brazghul" looks like Turkish to me. Please! "Braciole" is pronounced
> "bra-cho-lay" .
>
> Vale,
> Livia
> >
> >
> > The recipe in the link looks weird to me. My family is from Catanzaro so
> maybe our recipe isn't properly sicilian (which is where I think the dish
> comes from) so we make a different version of brazghul (phonetic sp,
> obviously) that consists of hard boiled eggs, romano cheese, salt, pepper,
> parsely, and garlic. Have your butcher tenderize some top round cuts and
> roll all of the ingredients into the steak. Tooth pick or butcher tie and
> simmer in lard or oil in a pan until brown. I cook it extra with a fresh
> marinara after the brazghul is already browned for about a half hour or
> until my sauce is reduced. My coup de grace is to serve the sauce with
> spinach ravioli instead of just eating the brazghul by itself.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > > To: Nova-Roma@yahoogrou <mailto:Nova- Roma%40yahoogrou ps.com> ps.com
> > > From: famila.ulleria. venii@
> > > Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2009 19:02:34 -0500
> > > Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: Another little brag. . .
> > >
> > > Ave Maior;
> > >
> > > On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 6:06 PM, Maior<rory12001@ > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Salvete Venator Juliaque;
> > > > ecastor I'm hungry, I had no nonna and instead got chicken soup a poor
> > > > second in my opinion to Italian cuisine;-) So thank you for sharing
> and I'd
> > > > love more recipes from our cives. Food definitely is something we
> should be
> > > > discussing in the forum!
> > > > bene vale
> > > > Maior
> > > >
> > > > here is the link to the NRwiki! add more recipes omnes:)
> > > > http://www.novaroma <http://www.novaroma .org/nr/Bracciol a>
> .org/nr/Bracciola
> > > >
> > >
> > > I think if you and I can keep discussions to matters of plate and cup,
> > > we might just have common ground after all ,-)
> > >
> > > Just for you then, Nonnie D'Orazio's Zuppa Jennie (named after her
> > > mother, Giovannia Mastroianni, nee Riciardelli) , know elsewhere as
> > > Italian Wedding Soup. . .a term I had not heard until after I'd moved
> > > to Illinois in 1996, 39 years after I'd been born .-)
> > >
> > > Foodstuffs: 4 qt home made chicken stock, 1# ea ground chicken and
> > > veal, 1/2 c dried bread - finely grated, 2 lg chicken eggs - beaten, 1
> > > t ea dried oregano, basil and parsley - rubbed to small particles, 6
> > > cloves garlic - crushed, 1 t ea salt and fresh-ground black pepper, 2
> > > c long grain rice, 2 c ea spinach, escarole, endive and leek - coarse
> > > chopped and a bowl of freshly shredded Asiago d'allevo or
> > > Parmigiano-Reggiano for garnishing
> > >
> > > Method: While bringing the stock to a boil, mix well the ground
> > > meats, bread crumbs, eggs, herbs, garlic, salt and pepper. Shape mix
> > > into small balls, about the size of chestnuts. Drop a few at a time
> > > into the boiling stock, so as to not reduce the temperature; cook
> > > about 10 minutes. Stir in the rice and cook an additional 15 minutes.
> > > Stir in the greens and cook 15 more minutes.
> > >
> > > Serve in a wide, shallow soup bowl with a libel sprinkling of cheese.
> > >
> > > Side dishes, if this is the main course; fresh baked bread with butter
> > > and a mix of string beans and summer squash - steamed and dressed with
> > > balsamic vinegar mixed with a bit of brown mustard.
> > >
> > > Vale - Venator
> > >
> > >
> > > ------------ --------- --------- ------
> > >
> > > Yahoo! Groups Links
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> > ____________ _________ _________ _________ _________ _________ _
> > Windows LiveT: Keep your life in sync.
> > http://windowslive.
> <http://windowslive. com/explore? ocid=TXT_ TAGLM_WL_ BR_life_in_ synch_062009>
> com/explore? ocid=TXT_ TAGLM_WL_ BR_life_in_ synch_062009
> >
>
>
>
>
>
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> Version: 8.5.339 / Virus Database: 270.12.59/2165 - Release Date: 06/09/09
> 05:53:00
>

No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 8.5.339 / Virus Database: 270.12.59/2165 - Release Date: 06/09/09 05:53:00

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66541 From: L Julia Aquila Date: 2009-06-09
Subject: Re: Another little brag. . .
Salve Livia,

You make a very valid point. We Italoamericani were raised in a mix of Italian dialects and so it would be natural that we would *almost* develop our own. My Grandmother would tell me that some of the dialects she heard in the US from some native Italian speakers were so bad that she had trouble understanding them.
On the other hand, those who do not have English as a first language also have similar problems with English. My Grandfather loved Eenger Rogeeras. We know her as Ginger Rogers;)
An example of Italian influenced English is for the term "backyard" it is, or was, common in NYC and Long Island to hear children talking about playing in the backy-yard. Incorrect and often corrected later on but it comes from a melding of languages.
That said, I do very much appreciated your corrections.
Now the pronunciation of Mozzarella....?*smile*

Vale,
Julia

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "livia_plauta" <livia.plauta@...> wrote:
>
> Livia Plauta Catoni sal.
> I think you people are mixes of American, American and American. All the Italo-americans here would need a long holiday in the motherland, tied with a language course. I know good and cheap courses in Reggio Calabria.
>
> Vale,
> Livia
>
> >
> > Cato Liviae Plautae sal.
> >
> > Salve.
> >
> > Dunno if it's regional, but in our family we always pronounced it "brazhol" with a soft buzzy "z" kind of sound. We're a mix of Avellino and Palermo, though, with a touch of some tiny mountain town in Puglia.
> >
> > Vale,
> >
> > Cato
> >
> >
> >
> > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "livia_plauta" <livia.plauta@> wrote:
> > >
> > > Salve,
> > > Braciole literally just means (pork) "ribs", so it's natural to find thousands of different recipes for them.
> > > But "brazghul" looks like Turkish to me. Please! "Braciole" is pronounced "bra-cho-lay".
> > >
> > > Vale,
> > > Livia
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > The recipe in the link looks weird to me. My family is from Catanzaro so maybe our recipe isn't properly sicilian (which is where I think the dish comes from) so we make a different version of brazghul (phonetic sp, obviously) that consists of hard boiled eggs, romano cheese, salt, pepper, parsely, and garlic. Have your butcher tenderize some top round cuts and roll all of the ingredients into the steak. Tooth pick or butcher tie and simmer in lard or oil in a pan until brown. I cook it extra with a fresh marinara after the brazghul is already browned for about a half hour or until my sauce is reduced. My coup de grace is to serve the sauce with spinach ravioli instead of just eating the brazghul by itself.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> > > > > From: famila.ulleria.venii@
> > > > > Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2009 19:02:34 -0500
> > > > > Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: Another little brag. . .
> > > > >
> > > > > Ave Maior;
> > > > >
> > > > > On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 6:06 PM, Maior<rory12001@> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Salvete Venator Juliaque;
> > > > > > ecastor I'm hungry, I had no nonna and instead got chicken soup a poor
> > > > > > second in my opinion to Italian cuisine;-) So thank you for sharing and I'd
> > > > > > love more recipes from our cives. Food definitely is something we should be
> > > > > > discussing in the forum!
> > > > > > bene vale
> > > > > > Maior
> > > > > >
> > > > > > here is the link to the NRwiki! add more recipes omnes:)
> > > > > > http://www.novaroma.org/nr/Bracciola
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > I think if you and I can keep discussions to matters of plate and cup,
> > > > > we might just have common ground after all ,-)
> > > > >
> > > > > Just for you then, Nonnie D'Orazio's Zuppa Jennie (named after her
> > > > > mother, Giovannia Mastroianni, nee Riciardelli), know elsewhere as
> > > > > Italian Wedding Soup. . .a term I had not heard until after I'd moved
> > > > > to Illinois in 1996, 39 years after I'd been born .-)
> > > > >
> > > > > Foodstuffs: 4 qt home made chicken stock, 1# ea ground chicken and
> > > > > veal, 1/2 c dried bread - finely grated, 2 lg chicken eggs - beaten, 1
> > > > > t ea dried oregano, basil and parsley - rubbed to small particles, 6
> > > > > cloves garlic - crushed, 1 t ea salt and fresh-ground black pepper, 2
> > > > > c long grain rice, 2 c ea spinach, escarole, endive and leek - coarse
> > > > > chopped and a bowl of freshly shredded Asiago d'allevo or
> > > > > Parmigiano-Reggiano for garnishing
> > > > >
> > > > > Method: While bringing the stock to a boil, mix well the ground
> > > > > meats, bread crumbs, eggs, herbs, garlic, salt and pepper. Shape mix
> > > > > into small balls, about the size of chestnuts. Drop a few at a time
> > > > > into the boiling stock, so as to not reduce the temperature; cook
> > > > > about 10 minutes. Stir in the rice and cook an additional 15 minutes.
> > > > > Stir in the greens and cook 15 more minutes.
> > > > >
> > > > > Serve in a wide, shallow soup bowl with a libel sprinkling of cheese.
> > > > >
> > > > > Side dishes, if this is the main course; fresh baked bread with butter
> > > > > and a mix of string beans and summer squash - steamed and dressed with
> > > > > balsamic vinegar mixed with a bit of brown mustard.
> > > > >
> > > > > Vale - Venator
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > ------------------------------------
> > > > >
> > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > _________________________________________________________________
> > > > Windows Live™: Keep your life in sync.
> > > > http://windowslive.com/explore?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_BR_life_in_synch_062009
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66542 From: livia_plauta Date: 2009-06-09
Subject: Re: Another little brag. . .
LOL! I give up!
>
> Salve Livia,
>
> In America you just might see a fish on bicycle *laugh* Ever hear the phrase "Only in America"?
>
> Vale
> Julia
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "livia_plauta" <livia.plauta@> wrote:
> >
> > Salvete,
> > but which planet do you live on? Lasagna needs hard boiled egg like a fish needs a bicycle!
> >
> > Valete,
> > Livia
> > >
> > >
> > > Sal.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > That sounds a lot more correct in my opinion, as the hard boiled egg is essential to the recipe :) Lasagna, too, should have hard boiled egg done properly as well as a few other staple dishes (like pizza rustica).
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Just quick because I'm interested in the Italian disaspora, but are you from the mid-west somewhere? I've read that America has a lot of northern Italians, or at least some, but they settled outside of the NY/New England area (where overwhelmingly most Italians reside.) Every "paesano" I know is southern Italian like myself (Calarese in my case.) The farthest north I've ever even seen is Abruzzi.
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66543 From: Lyn Dowling Date: 2009-06-09
Subject: Re: Another little brag. . .
Salve, Julia,
 
I know, I know. I am not even slightly of Italian heritage, but Dad was raised in an Italian neighborhood and my mother was taught to cook by our friends and neighbors, and so we sound like, and occasionally swear like, Italian-Americans.
 
On Friday nights, Dad still orders "oonabeets" and doesn't give a damn whether the Floridians behind the counter understand him. "Una pizza" is the way it's ordered, period. Oh, and Pizza is not food. It's bread. You want food? Order veal, chicken or pasta. He didn't raise his kids to eat una pizz' for dinner.
 
vale,
L. Aemilia
(now humming "C'è 'na Luna")
 
From: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com [mailto:Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of L Julia Aquila
Sent: Tuesday, June 09, 2009 1:38 PM
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Another little brag. . .

Salve Livia,

You make a very valid point. We Italoamericani were raised in a mix of Italian dialects and so it would be natural that we would *almost* develop our own. My Grandmother would tell me that some of the dialects she heard in the US from some native Italian speakers were so bad that she had trouble understanding them.
On the other hand, those who do not have English as a first language also have similar problems with English. My Grandfather loved Eenger Rogeeras. We know her as Ginger Rogers;)
An example of Italian influenced English is for the term "backyard" it is, or was, common in NYC and Long Island to hear children talking about playing in the backy-yard. Incorrect and often corrected later on but it comes from a melding of languages.
That said, I do very much appreciated your corrections.
Now the pronunciation of Mozzarella.. ..?*smile*

Vale,
Julia

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com, "livia_plauta" <livia.plauta@ ...> wrote:
>
> Livia Plauta Catoni sal.
> I think you people are mixes of American, American and American. All the Italo-americans here would need a long holiday in the motherland, tied with a language course. I know good and cheap courses in Reggio Calabria.
>
> Vale,
> Livia
>
> >
> > Cato Liviae Plautae sal.
> >
> > Salve.
> >
> > Dunno if it's regional, but in our family we always pronounced it "brazhol" with a soft buzzy "z" kind of sound. We're a mix of Avellino and Palermo, though, with a touch of some tiny mountain town in Puglia.
> >
> > Vale,
> >
> > Cato
> >
> >
> >
> > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com, "livia_plauta" <livia.plauta@ > wrote:
> > >
> > > Salve,
> > > Braciole literally just means (pork) "ribs", so it's natural to find thousands of different recipes for them.
> > > But "brazghul" looks like Turkish to me. Please! "Braciole" is pronounced "bra-cho-lay" .
> > >
> > > Vale,
> > > Livia
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > The recipe in the link looks weird to me. My family is from Catanzaro so maybe our recipe isn't properly sicilian (which is where I think the dish comes from) so we make a different version of brazghul (phonetic sp, obviously) that consists of hard boiled eggs, romano cheese, salt, pepper, parsely, and garlic. Have your butcher tenderize some top round cuts and roll all of the ingredients into the steak. Tooth pick or butcher tie and simmer in lard or oil in a pan until brown. I cook it extra with a fresh marinara after the brazghul is already browned for about a half hour or until my sauce is reduced. My coup de grace is to serve the sauce with spinach ravioli instead of just eating the brazghul by itself.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > To: Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com
> > > > > From: famila.ulleria. venii@
> > > > > Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2009 19:02:34 -0500
> > > > > Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: Another little brag. . .
> > > > >
> > > > > Ave Maior;
> > > > >
> > > > > On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 6:06 PM, Maior<rory12001@ > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Salvete Venator Juliaque;
> > > > > > ecastor I'm hungry, I had no nonna and instead got chicken soup a poor
> > > > > > second in my opinion to Italian cuisine;-) So thank you for sharing and I'd
> > > > > > love more recipes from our cives. Food definitely is something we should be
> > > > > > discussing in the forum!
> > > > > > bene vale
> > > > > > Maior
> > > > > >
> > > > > > here is the link to the NRwiki! add more recipes omnes:)
> > > > > > http://www.novaroma .org/nr/Bracciol a
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > I think if you and I can keep discussions to matters of plate and cup,
> > > > > we might just have common ground after all ,-)
> > > > >
> > > > > Just for you then, Nonnie D'Orazio's Zuppa Jennie (named after her
> > > > > mother, Giovannia Mastroianni, nee Riciardelli) , know elsewhere as
> > > > > Italian Wedding Soup. . .a term I had not heard until after I'd moved
> > > > > to Illinois in 1996, 39 years after I'd been born .-)
> > > > >
> > > > > Foodstuffs: 4 qt home made chicken stock, 1# ea ground chicken and
> > > > > veal, 1/2 c dried bread - finely grated, 2 lg chicken eggs - beaten, 1
> > > > > t ea dried oregano, basil and parsley - rubbed to small particles, 6
> > > > > cloves garlic - crushed, 1 t ea salt and fresh-ground black pepper, 2
> > > > > c long grain rice, 2 c ea spinach, escarole, endive and leek - coarse
> > > > > chopped and a bowl of freshly shredded Asiago d'allevo or
> > > > > Parmigiano-Reggiano for garnishing
> > > > >
> > > > > Method: While bringing the stock to a boil, mix well the ground
> > > > > meats, bread crumbs, eggs, herbs, garlic, salt and pepper. Shape mix
> > > > > into small balls, about the size of chestnuts. Drop a few at a time
> > > > > into the boiling stock, so as to not reduce the temperature; cook
> > > > > about 10 minutes. Stir in the rice and cook an additional 15 minutes.
> > > > > Stir in the greens and cook 15 more minutes.
> > > > >
> > > > > Serve in a wide, shallow soup bowl with a libel sprinkling of cheese.
> > > > >
> > > > > Side dishes, if this is the main course; fresh baked bread with butter
> > > > > and a mix of string beans and summer squash - steamed and dressed with
> > > > > balsamic vinegar mixed with a bit of brown mustard.
> > > > >
> > > > > Vale - Venator
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > ------------ --------- --------- ------
> > > > >
> > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > ____________ _________ _________ _________ _________ _________ _
> > > > Windows Live™: Keep your life in sync.
> > > > http://windowslive. com/explore? ocid=TXT_ TAGLM_WL_ BR_life_in_ synch_062009
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 8.5.339 / Virus Database: 270.12.59/2165 - Release Date: 06/09/09 05:53:00

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66544 From: Lyn Dowling Date: 2009-06-09
Subject: Re: Another little brag. . .
Salve, Livia,
 
I'm about to start a story about the lost art of braising, that form of cookery having a comeback of sorts in high-end restaurants.
 
Cooks here don't tend to do a lot of braising because the thought is it makes the kitchen too hot, and many diners don't even realize what good braising is. But with economic conditions being what they are, it may be time to get back to basics, such as what you can do with a less-than-magnificent piece of meat, a splash of decent wine and a good pot or pan. And I fully intend to involve whatever good Italian and French cooks I can find.
 
Vale,
LAM
 

From: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com [mailto:Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of livia_plauta
Sent: Tuesday, June 09, 2009 1:35 PM
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Another little brag. . .

Salve Aemilia,
I have to admit I was in panic until I found the translation below. LOL!

Actually I hadn't given an etymology for "braciole", but now that you ask I looked it up, and it comes from "brace" (ash), which in turn comes from Northern Italian "brasa", coming from a germanic word *brasa. Brasato also comes from the same root, but for that the Northern Italian origin is self-evident because of the voiced "s".

Vale,
Livia
>
> Salvete omnes,
>
> My family eats a lot of brazhol; mannihgowt and sdrahjadel too. We also
> order brihzhut, mootzadel and mordadel.* ;-)
>
> That's because we were raised in Northern New Jersey, with its large number
> of Sicilian-Americans and their linguistic shortcuts. Order "man-i-cotti" at
> a restaurant up there and the waiter knows you know nothing; order
> "mannihgowt" and he knows you're serious. Here in
> white-bread- in-plastic- bag Florida, it's the opposite. Italian restaurateurs
> here hug you if they think you actually know what you're about to eat.
>
> Now I'm hungry.
>
> vale,
> L. Aemilia
>
> * Brasciole, manicotti, stracciatella . . . prosciutto, mozzarella and
> mortadella
>
> PS -- Thanks for the etymology, Livia. I always thought the root for
> "brasciole"/ "braciole" was "brasato," as in "braised."
>
>
> _____
>
> From: Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com [mailto:Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com] On Behalf
> Of livia_plauta
> Sent: Tuesday, June 09, 2009 12:09 PM
> To: Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com
> Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Another little brag. . .
>
>
>
>
>
> Salve,
> Braciole literally just means (pork) "ribs", so it's natural to find
> thousands of different recipes for them.
> But "brazghul" looks like Turkish to me. Please! "Braciole" is pronounced
> "bra-cho-lay" .
>
> Vale,
> Livia
> >
> >
> > The recipe in the link looks weird to me. My family is from Catanzaro so
> maybe our recipe isn't properly sicilian (which is where I think the dish
> comes from) so we make a different version of brazghul (phonetic sp,
> obviously) that consists of hard boiled eggs, romano cheese, salt, pepper,
> parsely, and garlic. Have your butcher tenderize some top round cuts and
> roll all of the ingredients into the steak. Tooth pick or butcher tie and
> simmer in lard or oil in a pan until brown. I cook it extra with a fresh
> marinara after the brazghul is already browned for about a half hour or
> until my sauce is reduced. My coup de grace is to serve the sauce with
> spinach ravioli instead of just eating the brazghul by itself.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > > To: Nova-Roma@yahoogrou <mailto:Nova- Roma%40yahoogrou ps.com> ps.com
> > > From: famila.ulleria. venii@
> > > Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2009 19:02:34 -0500
> > > Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: Another little brag. . .
> > >
> > > Ave Maior;
> > >
> > > On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 6:06 PM, Maior<rory12001@ > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Salvete Venator Juliaque;
> > > > ecastor I'm hungry, I had no nonna and instead got chicken soup a poor
> > > > second in my opinion to Italian cuisine;-) So thank you for sharing
> and I'd
> > > > love more recipes from our cives. Food definitely is something we
> should be
> > > > discussing in the forum!
> > > > bene vale
> > > > Maior
> > > >
> > > > here is the link to the NRwiki! add more recipes omnes:)
> > > > http://www.novaroma <http://www.novaroma .org/nr/Bracciol a>
> .org/nr/Bracciola
> > > >
> > >
> > > I think if you and I can keep discussions to matters of plate and cup,
> > > we might just have common ground after all ,-)
> > >
> > > Just for you then, Nonnie D'Orazio's Zuppa Jennie (named after her
> > > mother, Giovannia Mastroianni, nee Riciardelli) , know elsewhere as
> > > Italian Wedding Soup. . .a term I had not heard until after I'd moved
> > > to Illinois in 1996, 39 years after I'd been born .-)
> > >
> > > Foodstuffs: 4 qt home made chicken stock, 1# ea ground chicken and
> > > veal, 1/2 c dried bread - finely grated, 2 lg chicken eggs - beaten, 1
> > > t ea dried oregano, basil and parsley - rubbed to small particles, 6
> > > cloves garlic - crushed, 1 t ea salt and fresh-ground black pepper, 2
> > > c long grain rice, 2 c ea spinach, escarole, endive and leek - coarse
> > > chopped and a bowl of freshly shredded Asiago d'allevo or
> > > Parmigiano-Reggiano for garnishing
> > >
> > > Method: While bringing the stock to a boil, mix well the ground
> > > meats, bread crumbs, eggs, herbs, garlic, salt and pepper. Shape mix
> > > into small balls, about the size of chestnuts. Drop a few at a time
> > > into the boiling stock, so as to not reduce the temperature; cook
> > > about 10 minutes. Stir in the rice and cook an additional 15 minutes.
> > > Stir in the greens and cook 15 more minutes.
> > >
> > > Serve in a wide, shallow soup bowl with a libel sprinkling of cheese.
> > >
> > > Side dishes, if this is the main course; fresh baked bread with butter
> > > and a mix of string beans and summer squash - steamed and dressed with
> > > balsamic vinegar mixed with a bit of brown mustard.
> > >
> > > Vale - Venator
> > >
> > >
> > > ------------ --------- --------- ------
> > >
> > > Yahoo! Groups Links
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> > ____________ _________ _________ _________ _________ _________ _
> > Windows LiveT: Keep your life in sync.
> > http://windowslive.
> <http://windowslive. com/explore? ocid=TXT_ TAGLM_WL_ BR_life_in_ synch_062009>
> com/explore? ocid=TXT_ TAGLM_WL_ BR_life_in_ synch_062009
> >
>
>
>
>
>
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> Version: 8.5.339 / Virus Database: 270.12.59/2165 - Release Date: 06/09/09
> 05:53:00
>

No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 8.5.339 / Virus Database: 270.12.59/2165 - Release Date: 06/09/09 05:53:00

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66545 From: QFabiusMaxmi@aol.com Date: 2009-06-09
Subject: Re: Intercessio!
In a message dated 6/9/2009 8:16:14 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time, woden66@... writes:
Those who beat the "be Roman, act Roman, follow the Romans" drum should understand that actual ancient Roman political practice was not really in any way democratic or "fair" by contemporary standards."
 
Of course we realize this!  In fact the government is acting very late Republican Roman, in putting their boy into office, by guile and mis direction.
 
But they got caught.  And on other the side, the middle Republican Romans are following their own precepts demanding that the rule of law be upheld.   
 
It is simply two periods of Romans clashing.  Which is a consistent problem here in Nova Roma.
 
Q. Fabius Maximus   
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66546 From: livia_plauta Date: 2009-06-09
Subject: Re: Another little brag. . .
Salvete,
ah bread is a sore topic! I would kill for a loaf of good bread too. Luckily in one week I'm going to Bulgaria, and I should be able to get it there, along with loads of other delicious food.

Hungary is one of the many lands of rubbery bread, and even in Turin (where my mother lives), which used to have some of the best bread in Italy, it's becoming impossible to find edible bread. It's all rubbery and half-raw.

The only place where I had really good bread recently was Naples.
In my desperation, I tried to bake bread the other day, but to my dismay the result was just as rubbery as the bread I can find in shops.

Valete,
Livia


>
> Salve, Julia,
>
> Stracciatelle/stracciatella is the wonderful Italian version of egg drop
> soup.
>
> I'll grant you, things are not that bad here, culinary wise. We are growing
> up. But Italian-wise? We transplants would kill for a loaf of good bread.
>
> vale,
> L. Aemilia
> (trying to write a food story this minute)
>
>
> _____
>
> From: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com [mailto:Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf
> Of L Julia Aquila
> Sent: Tuesday, June 09, 2009 1:05 PM
> To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Another little brag. . .
>
>
>
>
>
> Salve Amelia,
>
> Ack!!! *laughs* Ok I got most of them but what is "sdrahjadel." Ok how do
> you say Mozzarella? Matzarella, Mootsarella or Mootsarell?
> I am so wishing for a plateful of what you just said;)
> If you think Florida is bad, come to Nashville. We have one decent Italian
> restaurant that has an actual Italian chef. The others are either chains or
> something resembling Italian. I am not even going to get into the
> pronunciation...
>
> Vale,
> Julia
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogrou <mailto:Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com> ps.com, "Lyn
> Dowling" <ldowling@> wrote:
> >
> > Salvete omnes,
> >
> > My family eats a lot of brazhol; mannihgowt and sdrahjadel too. We also
> > order brihzhut, mootzadel and mordadel.* ;-)
> >
> > That's because we were raised in Northern New Jersey, with its large
> number
> > of Sicilian-Americans and their linguistic shortcuts. Order "man-i-cotti"
> at
> > a restaurant up there and the waiter knows you know nothing; order
> > "mannihgowt" and he knows you're serious. Here in
> > white-bread-in-plastic-bag Florida, it's the opposite. Italian
> restaurateurs
> > here hug you if they think you actually know what you're about to eat.
> >
> > Now I'm hungry.
> >
> > vale,
> > L. Aemilia
> >
> > * Brasciole, manicotti, stracciatella . . . prosciutto, mozzarella and
> > mortadella
> >
> > PS -- Thanks for the etymology, Livia. I always thought the root for
> > "brasciole"/"braciole" was "brasato," as in "braised."
> >
> >
> > _____
> >
> > From: Nova-Roma@yahoogrou <mailto:Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com> ps.com
> [mailto:Nova-Roma@yahoogrou <mailto:Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com> ps.com] On
> Behalf
> > Of livia_plauta
> > Sent: Tuesday, June 09, 2009 12:09 PM
> > To: Nova-Roma@yahoogrou <mailto:Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com> ps.com
> > Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Another little brag. . .
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Salve,
> > Braciole literally just means (pork) "ribs", so it's natural to find
> > thousands of different recipes for them.
> > But "brazghul" looks like Turkish to me. Please! "Braciole" is pronounced
> > "bra-cho-lay".
> >
> > Vale,
> > Livia
> > >
> > >
> > > The recipe in the link looks weird to me. My family is from Catanzaro so
> > maybe our recipe isn't properly sicilian (which is where I think the dish
> > comes from) so we make a different version of brazghul (phonetic sp,
> > obviously) that consists of hard boiled eggs, romano cheese, salt, pepper,
> > parsely, and garlic. Have your butcher tenderize some top round cuts and
> > roll all of the ingredients into the steak. Tooth pick or butcher tie and
> > simmer in lard or oil in a pan until brown. I cook it extra with a fresh
> > marinara after the brazghul is already browned for about a half hour or
> > until my sauce is reduced. My coup de grace is to serve the sauce with
> > spinach ravioli instead of just eating the brazghul by itself.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > > To: Nova-Roma@yahoogrou <mailto:Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com> ps.com
> > > > From: famila.ulleria.venii@
> > > > Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2009 19:02:34 -0500
> > > > Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: Another little brag. . .
> > > >
> > > > Ave Maior;
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 6:06 PM, Maior<rory12001@> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Salvete Venator Juliaque;
> > > > > ecastor I'm hungry, I had no nonna and instead got chicken soup a
> poor
> > > > > second in my opinion to Italian cuisine;-) So thank you for sharing
> > and I'd
> > > > > love more recipes from our cives. Food definitely is something we
> > should be
> > > > > discussing in the forum!
> > > > > bene vale
> > > > > Maior
> > > > >
> > > > > here is the link to the NRwiki! add more recipes omnes:)
> > > > > http://www.novaroma <http://www.novaroma
> <http://www.novaroma.org/nr/Bracciola> .org/nr/Bracciola>
> > .org/nr/Bracciola
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > I think if you and I can keep discussions to matters of plate and cup,
> > > > we might just have common ground after all ,-)
> > > >
> > > > Just for you then, Nonnie D'Orazio's Zuppa Jennie (named after her
> > > > mother, Giovannia Mastroianni, nee Riciardelli), know elsewhere as
> > > > Italian Wedding Soup. . .a term I had not heard until after I'd moved
> > > > to Illinois in 1996, 39 years after I'd been born .-)
> > > >
> > > > Foodstuffs: 4 qt home made chicken stock, 1# ea ground chicken and
> > > > veal, 1/2 c dried bread - finely grated, 2 lg chicken eggs - beaten, 1
> > > > t ea dried oregano, basil and parsley - rubbed to small particles, 6
> > > > cloves garlic - crushed, 1 t ea salt and fresh-ground black pepper, 2
> > > > c long grain rice, 2 c ea spinach, escarole, endive and leek - coarse
> > > > chopped and a bowl of freshly shredded Asiago d'allevo or
> > > > Parmigiano-Reggiano for garnishing
> > > >
> > > > Method: While bringing the stock to a boil, mix well the ground
> > > > meats, bread crumbs, eggs, herbs, garlic, salt and pepper. Shape mix
> > > > into small balls, about the size of chestnuts. Drop a few at a time
> > > > into the boiling stock, so as to not reduce the temperature; cook
> > > > about 10 minutes. Stir in the rice and cook an additional 15 minutes.
> > > > Stir in the greens and cook 15 more minutes.
> > > >
> > > > Serve in a wide, shallow soup bowl with a libel sprinkling of cheese.
> > > >
> > > > Side dishes, if this is the main course; fresh baked bread with butter
> > > > and a mix of string beans and summer squash - steamed and dressed with
> > > > balsamic vinegar mixed with a bit of brown mustard.
> > > >
> > > > Vale - Venator
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > ------------------------------------
> > > >
> > > > Yahoo! Groups Links
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > > __________________________________________________________
> > > Windows LiveT: Keep your life in sync.
> > > http://windowslive.
> > <http://windowslive.
> <http://windowslive.com/explore?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_BR_life_in_synch_062009>
> com/explore?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_BR_life_in_synch_062009>
> > com/explore?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_BR_life_in_synch_062009
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > No virus found in this incoming message.
> > Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> > Version: 8.5.339 / Virus Database: 270.12.59/2165 - Release Date: 06/09/09
> > 05:53:00
> >
>
>
>
>
>
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> Version: 8.5.339 / Virus Database: 270.12.59/2165 - Release Date: 06/09/09
> 05:53:00
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66547 From: livia_plauta Date: 2009-06-09
Subject: Re: Another little brag. . .
Salve Aemilia,
well, we Italians do tend to assimilate everybody else. You should see the way second-generation Chinese or African immigrants eat in Italy. They can't live without their plate of pasta, just like all the other Italians around them.

Vale,
Livia
>
> Salve, Julia,
>
> I know, I know. I am not even slightly of Italian heritage, but Dad was
> raised in an Italian neighborhood and my mother was taught to cook by our
> friends and neighbors, and so we sound like, and occasionally swear like,
> Italian-Americans.
>
> On Friday nights, Dad still orders "oonabeets" and doesn't give a damn
> whether the Floridians behind the counter understand him. "Una pizza" is the
> way it's ordered, period. Oh, and Pizza is not food. It's bread. You want
> food? Order veal, chicken or pasta. He didn't raise his kids to eat una
> pizz' for dinner.
>
> vale,
> L. Aemilia
> (now humming "C'è 'na Luna")
>
> From: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com [mailto:Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf
> Of L Julia Aquila
> Sent: Tuesday, June 09, 2009 1:38 PM
> To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Another little brag. . .
>
>
>
>
>
> Salve Livia,
>
> You make a very valid point. We Italoamericani were raised in a mix of
> Italian dialects and so it would be natural that we would *almost* develop
> our own. My Grandmother would tell me that some of the dialects she heard in
> the US from some native Italian speakers were so bad that she had trouble
> understanding them.
> On the other hand, those who do not have English as a first language also
> have similar problems with English. My Grandfather loved Eenger Rogeeras. We
> know her as Ginger Rogers;)
> An example of Italian influenced English is for the term "backyard" it is,
> or was, common in NYC and Long Island to hear children talking about playing
> in the backy-yard. Incorrect and often corrected later on but it comes from
> a melding of languages.
> That said, I do very much appreciated your corrections.
> Now the pronunciation of Mozzarella....?*smile*
>
> Vale,
> Julia
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogrou <mailto:Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com> ps.com,
> "livia_plauta" <livia.plauta@> wrote:
> >
> > Livia Plauta Catoni sal.
> > I think you people are mixes of American, American and American. All the
> Italo-americans here would need a long holiday in the motherland, tied with
> a language course. I know good and cheap courses in Reggio Calabria.
> >
> > Vale,
> > Livia
> >
> > >
> > > Cato Liviae Plautae sal.
> > >
> > > Salve.
> > >
> > > Dunno if it's regional, but in our family we always pronounced it
> "brazhol" with a soft buzzy "z" kind of sound. We're a mix of Avellino and
> Palermo, though, with a touch of some tiny mountain town in Puglia.
> > >
> > > Vale,
> > >
> > > Cato
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogrou <mailto:Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com> ps.com,
> "livia_plauta" <livia.plauta@> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Salve,
> > > > Braciole literally just means (pork) "ribs", so it's natural to find
> thousands of different recipes for them.
> > > > But "brazghul" looks like Turkish to me. Please! "Braciole" is
> pronounced "bra-cho-lay".
> > > >
> > > > Vale,
> > > > Livia
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > The recipe in the link looks weird to me. My family is from
> Catanzaro so maybe our recipe isn't properly sicilian (which is where I
> think the dish comes from) so we make a different version of brazghul
> (phonetic sp, obviously) that consists of hard boiled eggs, romano cheese,
> salt, pepper, parsely, and garlic. Have your butcher tenderize some top
> round cuts and roll all of the ingredients into the steak. Tooth pick or
> butcher tie and simmer in lard or oil in a pan until brown. I cook it extra
> with a fresh marinara after the brazghul is already browned for about a half
> hour or until my sauce is reduced. My coup de grace is to serve the sauce
> with spinach ravioli instead of just eating the brazghul by itself.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > > To: Nova-Roma@yahoogrou <mailto:Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com>
> ps.com
> > > > > > From: famila.ulleria.venii@
> > > > > > Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2009 19:02:34 -0500
> > > > > > Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: Another little brag. . .
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Ave Maior;
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 6:06 PM, Maior<rory12001@> wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Salvete Venator Juliaque;
> > > > > > > ecastor I'm hungry, I had no nonna and instead got chicken soup
> a poor
> > > > > > > second in my opinion to Italian cuisine;-) So thank you for
> sharing and I'd
> > > > > > > love more recipes from our cives. Food definitely is something
> we should be
> > > > > > > discussing in the forum!
> > > > > > > bene vale
> > > > > > > Maior
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > here is the link to the NRwiki! add more recipes omnes:)
> > > > > > > http://www.novaroma <http://www.novaroma.org/nr/Bracciola>
> .org/nr/Bracciola
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I think if you and I can keep discussions to matters of plate and
> cup,
> > > > > > we might just have common ground after all ,-)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Just for you then, Nonnie D'Orazio's Zuppa Jennie (named after her
> > > > > > mother, Giovannia Mastroianni, nee Riciardelli), know elsewhere as
> > > > > > Italian Wedding Soup. . .a term I had not heard until after I'd
> moved
> > > > > > to Illinois in 1996, 39 years after I'd been born .-)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Foodstuffs: 4 qt home made chicken stock, 1# ea ground chicken and
> > > > > > veal, 1/2 c dried bread - finely grated, 2 lg chicken eggs -
> beaten, 1
> > > > > > t ea dried oregano, basil and parsley - rubbed to small particles,
> 6
> > > > > > cloves garlic - crushed, 1 t ea salt and fresh-ground black
> pepper, 2
> > > > > > c long grain rice, 2 c ea spinach, escarole, endive and leek -
> coarse
> > > > > > chopped and a bowl of freshly shredded Asiago d'allevo or
> > > > > > Parmigiano-Reggiano for garnishing
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Method: While bringing the stock to a boil, mix well the ground
> > > > > > meats, bread crumbs, eggs, herbs, garlic, salt and pepper. Shape
> mix
> > > > > > into small balls, about the size of chestnuts. Drop a few at a
> time
> > > > > > into the boiling stock, so as to not reduce the temperature; cook
> > > > > > about 10 minutes. Stir in the rice and cook an additional 15
> minutes.
> > > > > > Stir in the greens and cook 15 more minutes.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Serve in a wide, shallow soup bowl with a libel sprinkling of
> cheese.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Side dishes, if this is the main course; fresh baked bread with
> butter
> > > > > > and a mix of string beans and summer squash - steamed and dressed
> with
> > > > > > balsamic vinegar mixed with a bit of brown mustard.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Vale - Venator
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > ------------------------------------
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > __________________________________________________________
> > > > > Windows Live™: Keep your life in sync.
> > > > > http://windowslive.
> <http://windowslive.com/explore?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_BR_life_in_synch_062009>
> com/explore?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_BR_life_in_synch_062009
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
>
>
>
>
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> Version: 8.5.339 / Virus Database: 270.12.59/2165 - Release Date: 06/09/09
> 05:53:00
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66548 From: livia_plauta Date: 2009-06-09
Subject: Re: Another little brag. . .
Come to Hungary! Tha land of braising!

>
> Salve, Livia,
>
> I'm about to start a story about the lost art of braising, that form of
> cookery having a comeback of sorts in high-end restaurants.
>
> Cooks here don't tend to do a lot of braising because the thought is it
> makes the kitchen too hot, and many diners don't even realize what good
> braising is. But with economic conditions being what they are, it may be
> time to get back to basics, such as what you can do with a
> less-than-magnificent piece of meat, a splash of decent wine and a good pot
> or pan. And I fully intend to involve whatever good Italian and French cooks
> I can find.
>
> Vale,
> LAM
>
> _____
>
> From: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com [mailto:Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf
> Of livia_plauta
> Sent: Tuesday, June 09, 2009 1:35 PM
> To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Another little brag. . .
>
>
>
>
>
> Salve Aemilia,
> I have to admit I was in panic until I found the translation below. LOL!
>
> Actually I hadn't given an etymology for "braciole", but now that you ask I
> looked it up, and it comes from "brace" (ash), which in turn comes from
> Northern Italian "brasa", coming from a germanic word *brasa. Brasato also
> comes from the same root, but for that the Northern Italian origin is
> self-evident because of the voiced "s".
>
> Vale,
> Livia
> >
> > Salvete omnes,
> >
> > My family eats a lot of brazhol; mannihgowt and sdrahjadel too. We also
> > order brihzhut, mootzadel and mordadel.* ;-)
> >
> > That's because we were raised in Northern New Jersey, with its large
> number
> > of Sicilian-Americans and their linguistic shortcuts. Order "man-i-cotti"
> at
> > a restaurant up there and the waiter knows you know nothing; order
> > "mannihgowt" and he knows you're serious. Here in
> > white-bread-in-plastic-bag Florida, it's the opposite. Italian
> restaurateurs
> > here hug you if they think you actually know what you're about to eat.
> >
> > Now I'm hungry.
> >
> > vale,
> > L. Aemilia
> >
> > * Brasciole, manicotti, stracciatella . . . prosciutto, mozzarella and
> > mortadella
> >
> > PS -- Thanks for the etymology, Livia. I always thought the root for
> > "brasciole"/"braciole" was "brasato," as in "braised."
> >
> >
> > _____
> >
> > From: Nova-Roma@yahoogrou <mailto:Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com> ps.com
> [mailto:Nova-Roma@yahoogrou <mailto:Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com> ps.com] On
> Behalf
> > Of livia_plauta
> > Sent: Tuesday, June 09, 2009 12:09 PM
> > To: Nova-Roma@yahoogrou <mailto:Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com> ps.com
> > Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Another little brag. . .
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Salve,
> > Braciole literally just means (pork) "ribs", so it's natural to find
> > thousands of different recipes for them.
> > But "brazghul" looks like Turkish to me. Please! "Braciole" is pronounced
> > "bra-cho-lay".
> >
> > Vale,
> > Livia
> > >
> > >
> > > The recipe in the link looks weird to me. My family is from Catanzaro so
> > maybe our recipe isn't properly sicilian (which is where I think the dish
> > comes from) so we make a different version of brazghul (phonetic sp,
> > obviously) that consists of hard boiled eggs, romano cheese, salt, pepper,
> > parsely, and garlic. Have your butcher tenderize some top round cuts and
> > roll all of the ingredients into the steak. Tooth pick or butcher tie and
> > simmer in lard or oil in a pan until brown. I cook it extra with a fresh
> > marinara after the brazghul is already browned for about a half hour or
> > until my sauce is reduced. My coup de grace is to serve the sauce with
> > spinach ravioli instead of just eating the brazghul by itself.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > > To: Nova-Roma@yahoogrou <mailto:Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com> ps.com
> > > > From: famila.ulleria.venii@
> > > > Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2009 19:02:34 -0500
> > > > Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: Another little brag. . .
> > > >
> > > > Ave Maior;
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 6:06 PM, Maior<rory12001@> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Salvete Venator Juliaque;
> > > > > ecastor I'm hungry, I had no nonna and instead got chicken soup a
> poor
> > > > > second in my opinion to Italian cuisine;-) So thank you for sharing
> > and I'd
> > > > > love more recipes from our cives. Food definitely is something we
> > should be
> > > > > discussing in the forum!
> > > > > bene vale
> > > > > Maior
> > > > >
> > > > > here is the link to the NRwiki! add more recipes omnes:)
> > > > > http://www.novaroma <http://www.novaroma
> <http://www.novaroma.org/nr/Bracciola> .org/nr/Bracciola>
> > .org/nr/Bracciola
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > I think if you and I can keep discussions to matters of plate and cup,
> > > > we might just have common ground after all ,-)
> > > >
> > > > Just for you then, Nonnie D'Orazio's Zuppa Jennie (named after her
> > > > mother, Giovannia Mastroianni, nee Riciardelli), know elsewhere as
> > > > Italian Wedding Soup. . .a term I had not heard until after I'd moved
> > > > to Illinois in 1996, 39 years after I'd been born .-)
> > > >
> > > > Foodstuffs: 4 qt home made chicken stock, 1# ea ground chicken and
> > > > veal, 1/2 c dried bread - finely grated, 2 lg chicken eggs - beaten, 1
> > > > t ea dried oregano, basil and parsley - rubbed to small particles, 6
> > > > cloves garlic - crushed, 1 t ea salt and fresh-ground black pepper, 2
> > > > c long grain rice, 2 c ea spinach, escarole, endive and leek - coarse
> > > > chopped and a bowl of freshly shredded Asiago d'allevo or
> > > > Parmigiano-Reggiano for garnishing
> > > >
> > > > Method: While bringing the stock to a boil, mix well the ground
> > > > meats, bread crumbs, eggs, herbs, garlic, salt and pepper. Shape mix
> > > > into small balls, about the size of chestnuts. Drop a few at a time
> > > > into the boiling stock, so as to not reduce the temperature; cook
> > > > about 10 minutes. Stir in the rice and cook an additional 15 minutes.
> > > > Stir in the greens and cook 15 more minutes.
> > > >
> > > > Serve in a wide, shallow soup bowl with a libel sprinkling of cheese.
> > > >
> > > > Side dishes, if this is the main course; fresh baked bread with butter
> > > > and a mix of string beans and summer squash - steamed and dressed with
> > > > balsamic vinegar mixed with a bit of brown mustard.
> > > >
> > > > Vale - Venator
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > ------------------------------------
> > > >
> > > > Yahoo! Groups Links
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > > __________________________________________________________
> > > Windows LiveT: Keep your life in sync.
> > > http://windowslive.
> > <http://windowslive.
> <http://windowslive.com/explore?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_BR_life_in_synch_062009>
> com/explore?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_BR_life_in_synch_062009>
> > com/explore?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_BR_life_in_synch_062009
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > No virus found in this incoming message.
> > Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> > Version: 8.5.339 / Virus Database: 270.12.59/2165 - Release Date: 06/09/09
> > 05:53:00
> >
>
>
>
>
>
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> Version: 8.5.339 / Virus Database: 270.12.59/2165 - Release Date: 06/09/09
> 05:53:00
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66549 From: Lyn Dowling Date: 2009-06-09
Subject: Re: Another little brag. . .
Salvete,
 
The problem here is that bread is expected to last longer than a meal or two, and so it is put into plastic bags. Ugh.
 
Valete,
LAM
 


From: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com [mailto:Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of livia_plauta
Sent: Tuesday, June 09, 2009 2:13 PM
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Another little brag. . .

Salvete,
ah bread is a sore topic! I would kill for a loaf of good bread too. Luckily in one week I'm going to Bulgaria, and I should be able to get it there, along with loads of other delicious food.

Hungary is one of the many lands of rubbery bread, and even in Turin (where my mother lives), which used to have some of the best bread in Italy, it's becoming impossible to find edible bread. It's all rubbery and half-raw.

The only place where I had really good bread recently was Naples.
In my desperation, I tried to bake bread the other day, but to my dismay the result was just as rubbery as the bread I can find in shops.

Valete,
Livia

>
> Salve, Julia,
>
> Stracciatelle/ stracciatella is the wonderful Italian version of egg drop
> soup.
>
> I'll grant you, things are not that bad here, culinary wise. We are growing
> up. But Italian-wise? We transplants would kill for a loaf of good bread.
>
> vale,
> L. Aemilia
> (trying to write a food story this minute)
>
>
> _____
>
> From: Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com [mailto:Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com] On Behalf
> Of L Julia Aquila
> Sent: Tuesday, June 09, 2009 1:05 PM
> To: Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com
> Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Another little brag. . .
>
>
>
>
>
> Salve Amelia,
>
> Ack!!! *laughs* Ok I got most of them but what is "sdrahjadel. " Ok how do
> you say Mozzarella? Matzarella, Mootsarella or Mootsarell?
> I am so wishing for a plateful of what you just said;)
> If you think Florida is bad, come to Nashville. We have one decent Italian
> restaurant that has an actual Italian chef. The others are either chains or
> something resembling Italian. I am not even going to get into the
> pronunciation. ..
>
> Vale,
> Julia
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogrou <mailto:Nova- Roma%40yahoogrou ps.com> ps.com, "Lyn
> Dowling" <ldowling@> wrote:
> >
> > Salvete omnes,
> >
> > My family eats a lot of brazhol; mannihgowt and sdrahjadel too. We also
> > order brihzhut, mootzadel and mordadel.* ;-)
> >
> > That's because we were raised in Northern New Jersey, with its large
> number
> > of Sicilian-Americans and their linguistic shortcuts. Order "man-i-cotti"
> at
> > a restaurant up there and the waiter knows you know nothing; order
> > "mannihgowt" and he knows you're serious. Here in
> > white-bread- in-plastic- bag Florida, it's the opposite. Italian
> restaurateurs
> > here hug you if they think you actually know what you're about to eat.
> >
> > Now I'm hungry.
> >
> > vale,
> > L. Aemilia
> >
> > * Brasciole, manicotti, stracciatella . . . prosciutto, mozzarella and
> > mortadella
> >
> > PS -- Thanks for the etymology, Livia. I always thought the root for
> > "brasciole"/ "braciole" was "brasato," as in "braised."
> >
> >
> > _____
> >
> > From: Nova-Roma@yahoogrou <mailto:Nova- Roma%40yahoogrou ps.com> ps.com
> [mailto:Nova- Roma@yahoogrou <mailto:Nova- Roma%40yahoogrou ps.com> ps.com] On
> Behalf
> > Of livia_plauta
> > Sent: Tuesday, June 09, 2009 12:09 PM
> > To: Nova-Roma@yahoogrou <mailto:Nova- Roma%40yahoogrou ps.com> ps.com
> > Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Another little brag. . .
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Salve,
> > Braciole literally just means (pork) "ribs", so it's natural to find
> > thousands of different recipes for them.
> > But "brazghul" looks like Turkish to me. Please! "Braciole" is pronounced
> > "bra-cho-lay" .
> >
> > Vale,
> > Livia
> > >
> > >
> > > The recipe in the link looks weird to me. My family is from Catanzaro so
> > maybe our recipe isn't properly sicilian (which is where I think the dish
> > comes from) so we make a different version of brazghul (phonetic sp,
> > obviously) that consists of hard boiled eggs, romano cheese, salt, pepper,
> > parsely, and garlic. Have your butcher tenderize some top round cuts and
> > roll all of the ingredients into the steak. Tooth pick or butcher tie and
> > simmer in lard or oil in a pan until brown. I cook it extra with a fresh
> > marinara after the brazghul is already browned for about a half hour or
> > until my sauce is reduced. My coup de grace is to serve the sauce with
> > spinach ravioli instead of just eating the brazghul by itself.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > > To: Nova-Roma@yahoogrou <mailto:Nova- Roma%40yahoogrou ps.com> ps.com
> > > > From: famila.ulleria. venii@
> > > > Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2009 19:02:34 -0500
> > > > Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: Another little brag. . .
> > > >
> > > > Ave Maior;
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 6:06 PM, Maior<rory12001@ > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Salvete Venator Juliaque;
> > > > > ecastor I'm hungry, I had no nonna and instead got chicken soup a
> poor
> > > > > second in my opinion to Italian cuisine;-) So thank you for sharing
> > and I'd
> > > > > love more recipes from our cives. Food definitely is something we
> > should be
> > > > > discussing in the forum!
> > > > > bene vale
> > > > > Maior
> > > > >
> > > > > here is the link to the NRwiki! add more recipes omnes:)
> > > > > http://www.novaroma <http://www.novaroma
> <http://www.novaroma .org/nr/Bracciol a> .org/nr/Bracciola>
> > .org/nr/Bracciola
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > I think if you and I can keep discussions to matters of plate and cup,
> > > > we might just have common ground after all ,-)
> > > >
> > > > Just for you then, Nonnie D'Orazio's Zuppa Jennie (named after her
> > > > mother, Giovannia Mastroianni, nee Riciardelli) , know elsewhere as
> > > > Italian Wedding Soup. . .a term I had not heard until after I'd moved
> > > > to Illinois in 1996, 39 years after I'd been born .-)
> > > >
> > > > Foodstuffs: 4 qt home made chicken stock, 1# ea ground chicken and
> > > > veal, 1/2 c dried bread - finely grated, 2 lg chicken eggs - beaten, 1
> > > > t ea dried oregano, basil and parsley - rubbed to small particles, 6
> > > > cloves garlic - crushed, 1 t ea salt and fresh-ground black pepper, 2
> > > > c long grain rice, 2 c ea spinach, escarole, endive and leek - coarse
> > > > chopped and a bowl of freshly shredded Asiago d'allevo or
> > > > Parmigiano-Reggiano for garnishing
> > > >
> > > > Method: While bringing the stock to a boil, mix well the ground
> > > > meats, bread crumbs, eggs, herbs, garlic, salt and pepper. Shape mix
> > > > into small balls, about the size of chestnuts. Drop a few at a time
> > > > into the boiling stock, so as to not reduce the temperature; cook
> > > > about 10 minutes. Stir in the rice and cook an additional 15 minutes.
> > > > Stir in the greens and cook 15 more minutes.
> > > >
> > > > Serve in a wide, shallow soup bowl with a libel sprinkling of cheese.
> > > >
> > > > Side dishes, if this is the main course; fresh baked bread with butter
> > > > and a mix of string beans and summer squash - steamed and dressed with
> > > > balsamic vinegar mixed with a bit of brown mustard.
> > > >
> > > > Vale - Venator
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > ------------ --------- --------- ------
> > > >
> > > > Yahoo! Groups Links
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > > ____________ _________ _________ _________ _________ _________ _
> > > Windows LiveT: Keep your life in sync.
> > > http://windowslive.
> > <http://windowslive.
> <http://windowslive. com/explore? ocid=TXT_ TAGLM_WL_ BR_life_in_ synch_062009>
> com/explore? ocid=TXT_ TAGLM_WL_ BR_life_in_ synch_062009>
> > com/explore? ocid=TXT_ TAGLM_WL_ BR_life_in_ synch_062009
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > No virus found in this incoming message.
> > Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> > Version: 8.5.339 / Virus Database: 270.12.59/2165 - Release Date: 06/09/09
> > 05:53:00
> >
>
>
>
>
>
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> Version: 8.5.339 / Virus Database: 270.12.59/2165 - Release Date: 06/09/09
> 05:53:00
>

No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 8.5.339 / Virus Database: 270.12.59/2165 - Release Date: 06/09/09 05:53:00

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66550 From: Maior Date: 2009-06-09
Subject: Re: Intercessio!
Salvete;
I'd like to see an example from the Republic of a tribune vetoing an election AFTER voting began.
You won't find it.

Right now it is the Vestalia, when the Temple of Vesta's doors were open to all the women of Rome, it is a very serious time. I find it sad that it is taken up with another sterile poltical-legal argument by the same group that has been doing this for months. And acheiving absolutely nothing.....
Vesta Mater be propitious to us
M. Hortensia Maior


>
>
> In a message dated 6/9/2009 8:16:14 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
> woden66@... writes:
>
> Those who beat the "be Roman, act Roman, follow the Romans" drum should
> understand that actual ancient Roman political practice was not really in any
> way democratic or "fair" by contemporary standards."
>
>
>
>
> Of course we realize this! In fact the government is acting very late
> Republican Roman, in putting their boy into office, by guile and mis direction.
>
> But they got caught. And on other the side, the middle Republican Romans
> are following their own precepts demanding that the rule of law be upheld.
>
>
> It is simply two periods of Romans clashing. Which is a consistent
> problem here in Nova Roma.
>
> Q. Fabius Maximus
> **************A Good Credit Score is 700 or Above. See yours in just 2 easy
> steps!
> (http://pr.atwola.com/promoclk/100126575x1221322977x1201367197/aol?redir=http://www.freecreditreport.com/pm/default.aspx?sc=668072&hmpgID=62&bcd=
> JunestepsfooterNO62)
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66551 From: L Julia Aquila Date: 2009-06-09
Subject: Re: Another little brag. . .
Salve Amelia,

Ok ok...you got me on that one!

Does Progresso make a version? *laugh* You see what you don't know is that I am domestically challenged but I will try and sometimes what i cook comes out great, other times...well;)

When I first moved down south in the early 1980's I could not find a decent grocery store, delis were non-existant and I would have to buy my cheeses and Ricotta, cold cuts etc when I travelled and would bring them back in a cooler on the plane.I was fortunate I travelled internationally with my job, it made it easier to bear, my children didn't know any better;) We have one Jewish Deli now but it is not like a New York Jewish deli, not a decent knish. German deli's are non-existant I am so sad to say. I miss the bagel shop in Great Neck that always had fresh bagels that you could smell for blocks...oh and Mondello's Bakery, going there early in the morning to get fresh Italian bread! They also had what they called Italian Ices, which were like an icy Italian gelato. A fresh loaf of true Italian or French bread is not to be had here in Nashville. They do ok on Bagels...but somehow they are just not the same. We are experiencing an influx of Easterners and Northerners in past few years and there was one fairly good Italian bakery(owners from Brooklyn) who made great cannolis but their pastry was a bit bland as were their Italian cheescake. The worst thing, and they too lamented, is that they are not allowed to use real rum in the rumcakes, and they suffered for it. But he made them for me special. The shop has moved but I do not know where. Ricotta is still a problem, one can get that grainy paste all day long but I can sometimes find Polly-O at Publix and a new one is being built right down the block! Also we are getting a Butcher shop, it would be nice to buy super fresh meats. I miss buying Kosher chickens also, hand chosen blessed by the Rabbi on sight and humanely dressed. *laughs* This lament is your fault ya know!

*laughs* Maybe Cato will host a culinary conventus for transplanted Nova Roma Easterners and sympathizers and we can converge on his hotel in New York and we can pillage all those culinary delights, well in some cases , staples, we so miss!

Ok I have to say one more thing. The south has many many many wonderful delightful foods that I have too often indulged and if i moved to another part of the country I will miss those too, to a lesser degree naturally.

Vale,
Julia

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Lyn Dowling" <ldowling@...> wrote:
>
> Salve, Julia,
>
> Stracciatelle/stracciatella is the wonderful Italian version of egg drop
> soup.
>
> I'll grant you, things are not that bad here, culinary wise. We are growing
> up. But Italian-wise? We transplants would kill for a loaf of good bread.
>
> vale,
> L. Aemilia
> (trying to write a food story this minute)
>
>
> _____
>
> From: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com [mailto:Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf
> Of L Julia Aquila
> Sent: Tuesday, June 09, 2009 1:05 PM
> To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Another little brag. . .
>
>
>
>
>
> Salve Amelia,
>
> Ack!!! *laughs* Ok I got most of them but what is "sdrahjadel." Ok how do
> you say Mozzarella? Matzarella, Mootsarella or Mootsarell?
> I am so wishing for a plateful of what you just said;)
> If you think Florida is bad, come to Nashville. We have one decent Italian
> restaurant that has an actual Italian chef. The others are either chains or
> something resembling Italian. I am not even going to get into the
> pronunciation...
>
> Vale,
> Julia
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogrou <mailto:Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com> ps.com, "Lyn
> Dowling" <ldowling@> wrote:
> >
> > Salvete omnes,
> >
> > My family eats a lot of brazhol; mannihgowt and sdrahjadel too. We also
> > order brihzhut, mootzadel and mordadel.* ;-)
> >
> > That's because we were raised in Northern New Jersey, with its large
> number
> > of Sicilian-Americans and their linguistic shortcuts. Order "man-i-cotti"
> at
> > a restaurant up there and the waiter knows you know nothing; order
> > "mannihgowt" and he knows you're serious. Here in
> > white-bread-in-plastic-bag Florida, it's the opposite. Italian
> restaurateurs
> > here hug you if they think you actually know what you're about to eat.
> >
> > Now I'm hungry.
> >
> > vale,
> > L. Aemilia
> >
> > * Brasciole, manicotti, stracciatella . . . prosciutto, mozzarella and
> > mortadella
> >
> > PS -- Thanks for the etymology, Livia. I always thought the root for
> > "brasciole"/"braciole" was "brasato," as in "braised."
> >
> >
> > _____
> >
> > From: Nova-Roma@yahoogrou <mailto:Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com> ps.com
> [mailto:Nova-Roma@yahoogrou <mailto:Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com> ps.com] On
> Behalf
> > Of livia_plauta
> > Sent: Tuesday, June 09, 2009 12:09 PM
> > To: Nova-Roma@yahoogrou <mailto:Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com> ps.com
> > Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Another little brag. . .
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Salve,
> > Braciole literally just means (pork) "ribs", so it's natural to find
> > thousands of different recipes for them.
> > But "brazghul" looks like Turkish to me. Please! "Braciole" is pronounced
> > "bra-cho-lay".
> >
> > Vale,
> > Livia
> > >
> > >
> > > The recipe in the link looks weird to me. My family is from Catanzaro so
> > maybe our recipe isn't properly sicilian (which is where I think the dish
> > comes from) so we make a different version of brazghul (phonetic sp,
> > obviously) that consists of hard boiled eggs, romano cheese, salt, pepper,
> > parsely, and garlic. Have your butcher tenderize some top round cuts and
> > roll all of the ingredients into the steak. Tooth pick or butcher tie and
> > simmer in lard or oil in a pan until brown. I cook it extra with a fresh
> > marinara after the brazghul is already browned for about a half hour or
> > until my sauce is reduced. My coup de grace is to serve the sauce with
> > spinach ravioli instead of just eating the brazghul by itself.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > > To: Nova-Roma@yahoogrou <mailto:Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com> ps.com
> > > > From: famila.ulleria.venii@
> > > > Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2009 19:02:34 -0500
> > > > Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: Another little brag. . .
> > > >
> > > > Ave Maior;
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 6:06 PM, Maior<rory12001@> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Salvete Venator Juliaque;
> > > > > ecastor I'm hungry, I had no nonna and instead got chicken soup a
> poor
> > > > > second in my opinion to Italian cuisine;-) So thank you for sharing
> > and I'd
> > > > > love more recipes from our cives. Food definitely is something we
> > should be
> > > > > discussing in the forum!
> > > > > bene vale
> > > > > Maior
> > > > >
> > > > > here is the link to the NRwiki! add more recipes omnes:)
> > > > > http://www.novaroma <http://www.novaroma
> <http://www.novaroma.org/nr/Bracciola> .org/nr/Bracciola>
> > .org/nr/Bracciola
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > I think if you and I can keep discussions to matters of plate and cup,
> > > > we might just have common ground after all ,-)
> > > >
> > > > Just for you then, Nonnie D'Orazio's Zuppa Jennie (named after her
> > > > mother, Giovannia Mastroianni, nee Riciardelli), know elsewhere as
> > > > Italian Wedding Soup. . .a term I had not heard until after I'd moved
> > > > to Illinois in 1996, 39 years after I'd been born .-)
> > > >
> > > > Foodstuffs: 4 qt home made chicken stock, 1# ea ground chicken and
> > > > veal, 1/2 c dried bread - finely grated, 2 lg chicken eggs - beaten, 1
> > > > t ea dried oregano, basil and parsley - rubbed to small particles, 6
> > > > cloves garlic - crushed, 1 t ea salt and fresh-ground black pepper, 2
> > > > c long grain rice, 2 c ea spinach, escarole, endive and leek - coarse
> > > > chopped and a bowl of freshly shredded Asiago d'allevo or
> > > > Parmigiano-Reggiano for garnishing
> > > >
> > > > Method: While bringing the stock to a boil, mix well the ground
> > > > meats, bread crumbs, eggs, herbs, garlic, salt and pepper. Shape mix
> > > > into small balls, about the size of chestnuts. Drop a few at a time
> > > > into the boiling stock, so as to not reduce the temperature; cook
> > > > about 10 minutes. Stir in the rice and cook an additional 15 minutes.
> > > > Stir in the greens and cook 15 more minutes.
> > > >
> > > > Serve in a wide, shallow soup bowl with a libel sprinkling of cheese.
> > > >
> > > > Side dishes, if this is the main course; fresh baked bread with butter
> > > > and a mix of string beans and summer squash - steamed and dressed with
> > > > balsamic vinegar mixed with a bit of brown mustard.
> > > >
> > > > Vale - Venator
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > ------------------------------------
> > > >
> > > > Yahoo! Groups Links
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > > __________________________________________________________
> > > Windows LiveT: Keep your life in sync.
> > > http://windowslive.
> > <http://windowslive.
> <http://windowslive.com/explore?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_BR_life_in_synch_062009>
> com/explore?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_BR_life_in_synch_062009>
> > com/explore?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_BR_life_in_synch_062009
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > No virus found in this incoming message.
> > Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> > Version: 8.5.339 / Virus Database: 270.12.59/2165 - Release Date: 06/09/09
> > 05:53:00
> >
>
>
>
>
>
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> Version: 8.5.339 / Virus Database: 270.12.59/2165 - Release Date: 06/09/09
> 05:53:00
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66552 From: l.coruncanius_cato@yahoo.com Date: 2009-06-09
Subject: Re: Intercessio
L. Coruncanius Cato Galerio Aureliano Tribunus Plebis SPD,

Sorry if saying what I think is viewed as "interfering with the official action of a Tribunus Plebis".

I said what I thought, and still think, and I will not step back. I must advise you about the last message from Equitius Cato, who told your cousin and also Tribune his intercessio is not valid, IMHO, it should be considered an interference to a Tribune's action, and sensitive of applying the full wheight of Summa Coercendi Potestas.

I humbly ask you to read some further messages of mine, when I state clearly that all Tribunes have their own mind and must act on their own will. I don't believe this is interfering with a Tribunus action. As I said during the contio in april, I abide the law.
But I ask you too to not place words I have not said in my mouth and after issue a threat like this, because I will defend my self.

Di vos incolumem custodiant.
--
L. Coruncanius Cato
Aedilis Curulis
Scriba Consulis Hispaniae

--- El lun, 8/6/09, PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@... <PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@...> escribió:

De: PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@... <PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@...>
Asunto: Re: [Nova-Roma] Intercessio
Para: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Fecha: lunes, 8 junio, 2009 7:43

Fl. Galerius Aurelianus Tribunus Plebis L. Coruncanio Cato. sal.

Your message comes dangerously close to violating certain sections of the Consitution and the lex Dida Genima de potestate tribunicia could be applied.  I recommend that you withdraw the statement and rephrase it with terms such as "in your opinion."  If you continue to interfere with the official action of a Tribunus Plebis, I will bring the weight of the Summa Coercendi Potestas against you.  The same applies to any other citizen who interferes with the official action of a Tribunus Plebis.

Vale.



-----Original Message-----
From: Lucius Coruncanius Cato <l.coruncanius_ cato@yahoo. com>
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com
Sent: Mon, 8 Jun 2009 4:56 am
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Intercessio



L. Coruncanius Cato omn. spd,

I am with you, Venator, in this statement. Time for vetoing the candidacy ended with the contio. Now it is time to move forward. This intercesio is not only unlawful, as it comes long past the 72h period, but a very dangerous movement, as it is a long step backwards and sets up a preced ent for those who doesn't like the results of an election. One might not like the results, but trying to overturn them by veto is really antidemocratic, and those gestures are only seen in places where the voice of citizens or members means less than wet paper.

I also agree with the needing of rewriting some of the laws involved in this election, to make them pristine clear, with words stating what they intend to mean, and permitting no interpretation. I sent a proposal to the Law Review commitee on those leges, which has been ignored by most of those who complain about the meaning and interpretation of those laws.

This shows, to me, that these actions and wills from those persons are not for the better of NR, but an intent to bring down all what has been accomplished for the last 11 years. I know coexistence is hard sometimes, but we have to carry on with it. And Venator shows this spirit by not resigning when he does not like something, and by the will to be part of the solution, and not of the problem.

I too ask for the tribunes to block this intercessio, even when it is not legal and should not be placed, and I humbly ask you, tribune Agrippa, to think about what you are doing, why yo do it, and what are the effects.

Di vos incolumem custodiant.

--
L. Coruncanius Cato
Aedilis Curulis
Scriba Consulis Hispaniae

--- El dom, 7/6/09, Publius Ullerius Stephanus Venator <famila.ulleria. venii@gmail. com> escri bió:

De: Publius Ullerius Stephanus Venator <famila.ulleria. venii@gmail. com>
Asunto: Re: [Nova-Roma] Intercessio
Para: Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com
Fecha: domingo, 7 junio, 2009 7:11

Avete Omnes;

I ask the other tribunes, as a long time Cives Nova Roma, to help
things move along by opposing this Intercession.

I was a voice, albeit a fairly quiet one, in opposition to the
candidacy of Modianus for Censor.

I still believe the Law under which his candidacy was touted as legal
and opposed as illegal is poorly written and too open to
interpretation. Our Laws need clarity, brevity and simplicity. Law
must not only be for the lawyers, it must be primarily for the
understanding by and protection of the People.

We must needs not try and cover every situation; having macronational
law, statute and regulation, which supersedes what we do here.

However, the Vox Populi has been heard, and is that not the true
foundation of any Res Publica? If the People do not contest the
legitimacy of a Law, it stands.

The majority of the People, by their resounding silence, also lent
tacit approval to the candidacy of Modianus. This intercession is, in
my opinion, an ex post facto attempt at what should have been resolved
during the discussion before the Cista opened.

By the vote count and tally, Modianus has the confidence of a majority
of the members of the Centuries.

Yes, this note has an air of resignation about it; what's done is
done, que sera, sera.

There are problems, which need to be addressed, and I will try better
to be a part of the solution. I am not considering leaving, neither
the Senate, the Lictorship nor Nova Roma, though I will step back from
committee and scribal appointments to ponder things. (...and, yes, I
realize I'd already been a bit withdrawn in those arenas already.) I
need time to think.

To my friends herein, I know this is unexpected, but did you really
see something different coming, in light of my nature?

I have made no enemies in Nova Roma, though there are a few who I find
useless to the future of our endeavor. I shall no longer respond to
them, neither directly nor indirectly, neither here nor elsewhere.

In closing, I ask again that the other Tribunes block this
Intercession and be more proactive in the future.

============ ========= ========= ========= ==
In amicitia et fides -
Publius Ullerius Stephanus Venator
Civis circa Quintilis MMDCCLI a.u.c.
Senator et Lictor

Religio Septentrionalis - Poeta
------------ --------- --------- ---
May the Holy Powers smile on our efforts.
May the Spirits of our family lines nod in approval.
May we be of Worth to our fellow Nova Romans.


Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66553 From: L Julia Aquila Date: 2009-06-09
Subject: Re: Another little brag. . .
Salve Amelia,

Do we really want to go to the great Pizza debate*laughs* ya know the one: Is it or isn't it Italian? Now that is even more heated than the pasta debate;)
Now you really did it! "che la luna menzzamara momma mia maradara, figumia lalalalala" Ok so I have never really known the words and made it up as i went along and it gets worse, way worse, and I will not torture Livia any further;)...
You really were assimilated into the "inner circle" weren't you. You are a "grandfathered" paisana! I can do better on "Quando, Quando."
You wouldn't know "Lazy Mary" would you? *laughs*

Vale,
Julia

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Lyn Dowling" <ldowling@...> wrote:
>
> Salve, Julia,
>
> I know, I know. I am not even slightly of Italian heritage, but Dad was
> raised in an Italian neighborhood and my mother was taught to cook by our
> friends and neighbors, and so we sound like, and occasionally swear like,
> Italian-Americans.
>
> On Friday nights, Dad still orders "oonabeets" and doesn't give a damn
> whether the Floridians behind the counter understand him. "Una pizza" is the
> way it's ordered, period. Oh, and Pizza is not food. It's bread. You want
> food? Order veal, chicken or pasta. He didn't raise his kids to eat una
> pizz' for dinner.
>
> vale,
> L. Aemilia
> (now humming "C'è 'na Luna")
>
> From: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com [mailto:Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf
> Of L Julia Aquila
> Sent: Tuesday, June 09, 2009 1:38 PM
> To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Another little brag. . .
>
>
>
>
>
> Salve Livia,
>
> You make a very valid point. We Italoamericani were raised in a mix of
> Italian dialects and so it would be natural that we would *almost* develop
> our own. My Grandmother would tell me that some of the dialects she heard in
> the US from some native Italian speakers were so bad that she had trouble
> understanding them.
> On the other hand, those who do not have English as a first language also
> have similar problems with English. My Grandfather loved Eenger Rogeeras. We
> know her as Ginger Rogers;)
> An example of Italian influenced English is for the term "backyard" it is,
> or was, common in NYC and Long Island to hear children talking about playing
> in the backy-yard. Incorrect and often corrected later on but it comes from
> a melding of languages.
> That said, I do very much appreciated your corrections.
> Now the pronunciation of Mozzarella....?*smile*
>
> Vale,
> Julia
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogrou <mailto:Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com> ps.com,
> "livia_plauta" <livia.plauta@> wrote:
> >
> > Livia Plauta Catoni sal.
> > I think you people are mixes of American, American and American. All the
> Italo-americans here would need a long holiday in the motherland, tied with
> a language course. I know good and cheap courses in Reggio Calabria.
> >
> > Vale,
> > Livia
> >
> > >
> > > Cato Liviae Plautae sal.
> > >
> > > Salve.
> > >
> > > Dunno if it's regional, but in our family we always pronounced it
> "brazhol" with a soft buzzy "z" kind of sound. We're a mix of Avellino and
> Palermo, though, with a touch of some tiny mountain town in Puglia.
> > >
> > > Vale,
> > >
> > > Cato
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogrou <mailto:Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com> ps.com,
> "livia_plauta" <livia.plauta@> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Salve,
> > > > Braciole literally just means (pork) "ribs", so it's natural to find
> thousands of different recipes for them.
> > > > But "brazghul" looks like Turkish to me. Please! "Braciole" is
> pronounced "bra-cho-lay".
> > > >
> > > > Vale,
> > > > Livia
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > The recipe in the link looks weird to me. My family is from
> Catanzaro so maybe our recipe isn't properly sicilian (which is where I
> think the dish comes from) so we make a different version of brazghul
> (phonetic sp, obviously) that consists of hard boiled eggs, romano cheese,
> salt, pepper, parsely, and garlic. Have your butcher tenderize some top
> round cuts and roll all of the ingredients into the steak. Tooth pick or
> butcher tie and simmer in lard or oil in a pan until brown. I cook it extra
> with a fresh marinara after the brazghul is already browned for about a half
> hour or until my sauce is reduced. My coup de grace is to serve the sauce
> with spinach ravioli instead of just eating the brazghul by itself.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > > To: Nova-Roma@yahoogrou <mailto:Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com>
> ps.com
> > > > > > From: famila.ulleria.venii@
> > > > > > Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2009 19:02:34 -0500
> > > > > > Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: Another little brag. . .
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Ave Maior;
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 6:06 PM, Maior<rory12001@> wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Salvete Venator Juliaque;
> > > > > > > ecastor I'm hungry, I had no nonna and instead got chicken soup
> a poor
> > > > > > > second in my opinion to Italian cuisine;-) So thank you for
> sharing and I'd
> > > > > > > love more recipes from our cives. Food definitely is something
> we should be
> > > > > > > discussing in the forum!
> > > > > > > bene vale
> > > > > > > Maior
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > here is the link to the NRwiki! add more recipes omnes:)
> > > > > > > http://www.novaroma <http://www.novaroma.org/nr/Bracciola>
> .org/nr/Bracciola
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I think if you and I can keep discussions to matters of plate and
> cup,
> > > > > > we might just have common ground after all ,-)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Just for you then, Nonnie D'Orazio's Zuppa Jennie (named after her
> > > > > > mother, Giovannia Mastroianni, nee Riciardelli), know elsewhere as
> > > > > > Italian Wedding Soup. . .a term I had not heard until after I'd
> moved
> > > > > > to Illinois in 1996, 39 years after I'd been born .-)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Foodstuffs: 4 qt home made chicken stock, 1# ea ground chicken and
> > > > > > veal, 1/2 c dried bread - finely grated, 2 lg chicken eggs -
> beaten, 1
> > > > > > t ea dried oregano, basil and parsley - rubbed to small particles,
> 6
> > > > > > cloves garlic - crushed, 1 t ea salt and fresh-ground black
> pepper, 2
> > > > > > c long grain rice, 2 c ea spinach, escarole, endive and leek -
> coarse
> > > > > > chopped and a bowl of freshly shredded Asiago d'allevo or
> > > > > > Parmigiano-Reggiano for garnishing
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Method: While bringing the stock to a boil, mix well the ground
> > > > > > meats, bread crumbs, eggs, herbs, garlic, salt and pepper. Shape
> mix
> > > > > > into small balls, about the size of chestnuts. Drop a few at a
> time
> > > > > > into the boiling stock, so as to not reduce the temperature; cook
> > > > > > about 10 minutes. Stir in the rice and cook an additional 15
> minutes.
> > > > > > Stir in the greens and cook 15 more minutes.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Serve in a wide, shallow soup bowl with a libel sprinkling of
> cheese.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Side dishes, if this is the main course; fresh baked bread with
> butter
> > > > > > and a mix of string beans and summer squash - steamed and dressed
> with
> > > > > > balsamic vinegar mixed with a bit of brown mustard.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Vale - Venator
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > ------------------------------------
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > __________________________________________________________
> > > > > Windows Live™: Keep your life in sync.
> > > > > http://windowslive.
> <http://windowslive.com/explore?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_BR_life_in_synch_062009>
> com/explore?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_BR_life_in_synch_062009
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
>
>
>
>
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> Version: 8.5.339 / Virus Database: 270.12.59/2165 - Release Date: 06/09/09
> 05:53:00
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66554 From: Lyn Dowling Date: 2009-06-09
Subject: Re: Another little brag. . .
Salve, Julia,
 
When I was a kid and Lou Monte was entertaining at local Italian clubs, "Lazy Mary" was considered the bastardized version. But a few months back, I brought my little nephew to one of the local pizzerias, which had on the (Italian-language) recording and I starting singing along to it as a joke, which elicited free arrancini.  I think we got it to shut me up.
 
If they thought that was bad, they should hear me try the language of my ancestors: Gaelic.
 
Vale,
LAM


From: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com [mailto:Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of L Julia Aquila
Sent: Tuesday, June 09, 2009 2:53 PM
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Another little brag. . .

Salve Amelia,

Do we really want to go to the great Pizza debate*laughs* ya know the one: Is it or isn't it Italian? Now that is even more heated than the pasta debate;)
Now you really did it! "che la luna menzzamara momma mia maradara, figumia lalalalala" Ok so I have never really known the words and made it up as i went along and it gets worse, way worse, and I will not torture Livia any further;)...
You really were assimilated into the "inner circle" weren't you. You are a "grandfathered" paisana! I can do better on "Quando, Quando."
You wouldn't know "Lazy Mary" would you? *laughs*

Vale,
Julia

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com, "Lyn Dowling" <ldowling@.. .> wrote:
>
> Salve, Julia,
>
> I know, I know. I am not even slightly of Italian heritage, but Dad was
> raised in an Italian neighborhood and my mother was taught to cook by our
> friends and neighbors, and so we sound like, and occasionally swear like,
> Italian-Americans.
>
> On Friday nights, Dad still orders "oonabeets" and doesn't give a damn
> whether the Floridians behind the counter understand him. "Una pizza" is the
> way it's ordered, period. Oh, and Pizza is not food. It's bread. You want
> food? Order veal, chicken or pasta. He didn't raise his kids to eat una
> pizz' for dinner.
>
> vale,
> L. Aemilia
> (now humming "C'è 'na Luna")
>
> From: Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com [mailto:Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com] On Behalf
> Of L Julia Aquila
> Sent: Tuesday, June 09, 2009 1:38 PM
> To: Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com
> Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Another little brag. . .
>
>
>
>
>
> Salve Livia,
>
> You make a very valid point. We Italoamericani were raised in a mix of
> Italian dialects and so it would be natural that we would *almost* develop
> our own. My Grandmother would tell me that some of the dialects she heard in
> the US from some native Italian speakers were so bad that she had trouble
> understanding them.
> On the other hand, those who do not have English as a first language also
> have similar problems with English. My Grandfather loved Eenger Rogeeras. We
> know her as Ginger Rogers;)
> An example of Italian influenced English is for the term "backyard" it is,
> or was, common in NYC and Long Island to hear children talking about playing
> in the backy-yard. Incorrect and often corrected later on but it comes from
> a melding of languages.
> That said, I do very much appreciated your corrections.
> Now the pronunciation of Mozzarella.. ..?*smile*
>
> Vale,
> Julia
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogrou <mailto:Nova- Roma%40yahoogrou ps.com> ps.com,
> "livia_plauta" <livia.plauta@ > wrote:
> >
> > Livia Plauta Catoni sal.
> > I think you people are mixes of American, American and American. All the
> Italo-americans here would need a long holiday in the motherland, tied with
> a language course. I know good and cheap courses in Reggio Calabria.
> >
> > Vale,
> > Livia
> >
> > >
> > > Cato Liviae Plautae sal.
> > >
> > > Salve.
> > >
> > > Dunno if it's regional, but in our family we always pronounced it
> "brazhol" with a soft buzzy "z" kind of sound. We're a mix of Avellino and
> Palermo, though, with a touch of some tiny mountain town in Puglia.
> > >
> > > Vale,
> > >
> > > Cato
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogrou <mailto:Nova- Roma%40yahoogrou ps.com> ps.com,
> "livia_plauta" <livia.plauta@ > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Salve,
> > > > Braciole literally just means (pork) "ribs", so it's natural to find
> thousands of different recipes for them.
> > > > But "brazghul" looks like Turkish to me. Please! "Braciole" is
> pronounced "bra-cho-lay" .
> > > >
> > > > Vale,
> > > > Livia
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > The recipe in the link looks weird to me. My family is from
> Catanzaro so maybe our recipe isn't properly sicilian (which is where I
> think the dish comes from) so we make a different version of brazghul
> (phonetic sp, obviously) that consists of hard boiled eggs, romano cheese,
> salt, pepper, parsely, and garlic. Have your butcher tenderize some top
> round cuts and roll all of the ingredients into the steak. Tooth pick or
> butcher tie and simmer in lard or oil in a pan until brown. I cook it extra
> with a fresh marinara after the brazghul is already browned for about a half
> hour or until my sauce is reduced. My coup de grace is to serve the sauce
> with spinach ravioli instead of just eating the brazghul by itself.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > > To: Nova-Roma@yahoogrou <mailto:Nova- Roma%40yahoogrou ps.com>
> ps.com
> > > > > > From: famila.ulleria. venii@
> > > > > > Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2009 19:02:34 -0500
> > > > > > Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: Another little brag. . .
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Ave Maior;
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 6:06 PM, Maior<rory12001@ > wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Salvete Venator Juliaque;
> > > > > > > ecastor I'm hungry, I had no nonna and instead got chicken soup
> a poor
> > > > > > > second in my opinion to Italian cuisine;-) So thank you for
> sharing and I'd
> > > > > > > love more recipes from our cives. Food definitely is something
> we should be
> > > > > > > discussing in the forum!
> > > > > > > bene vale
> > > > > > > Maior
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > here is the link to the NRwiki! add more recipes omnes:)
> > > > > > > http://www.novaroma <http://www.novaroma .org/nr/Bracciol a>
> .org/nr/Bracciola
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I think if you and I can keep discussions to matters of plate and
> cup,
> > > > > > we might just have common ground after all ,-)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Just for you then, Nonnie D'Orazio's Zuppa Jennie (named after her
> > > > > > mother, Giovannia Mastroianni, nee Riciardelli) , know elsewhere as
> > > > > > Italian Wedding Soup. . .a term I had not heard until after I'd
> moved
> > > > > > to Illinois in 1996, 39 years after I'd been born .-)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Foodstuffs: 4 qt home made chicken stock, 1# ea ground chicken and
> > > > > > veal, 1/2 c dried bread - finely grated, 2 lg chicken eggs -
> beaten, 1
> > > > > > t ea dried oregano, basil and parsley - rubbed to small particles,
> 6
> > > > > > cloves garlic - crushed, 1 t ea salt and fresh-ground black
> pepper, 2
> > > > > > c long grain rice, 2 c ea spinach, escarole, endive and leek -
> coarse
> > > > > > chopped and a bowl of freshly shredded Asiago d'allevo or
> > > > > > Parmigiano-Reggiano for garnishing
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Method: While bringing the stock to a boil, mix well the ground
> > > > > > meats, bread crumbs, eggs, herbs, garlic, salt and pepper. Shape
> mix
> > > > > > into small balls, about the size of chestnuts. Drop a few at a
> time
> > > > > > into the boiling stock, so as to not reduce the temperature; cook
> > > > > > about 10 minutes. Stir in the rice and cook an additional 15
> minutes.
> > > > > > Stir in the greens and cook 15 more minutes.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Serve in a wide, shallow soup bowl with a libel sprinkling of
> cheese.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Side dishes, if this is the main course; fresh baked bread with
> butter
> > > > > > and a mix of string beans and summer squash - steamed and dressed
> with
> > > > > > balsamic vinegar mixed with a bit of brown mustard.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Vale - Venator
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > ------------ --------- --------- ------
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > ____________ _________ _________ _________ _________ _________ _
> > > > > Windows Live™: Keep your life in sync.
> > > > > http://windowslive.
> <http://windowslive. com/explore? ocid=TXT_ TAGLM_WL_ BR_life_in_ synch_062009>
> com/explore? ocid=TXT_ TAGLM_WL_ BR_life_in_ synch_062009
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
>
>
>
>
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> Version: 8.5.339 / Virus Database: 270.12.59/2165 - Release Date: 06/09/09
> 05:53:00
>

No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 8.5.339 / Virus Database: 270.12.59/2165 - Release Date: 06/09/09 05:53:00

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66555 From: L Julia Aquila Date: 2009-06-09
Subject: Re: Another little brag. . .
Salve Amelia!

So you're Irish! Well then you are an adopted Italian *laughs*. You know a marriage between Irish and Italians make the most beautiful children. I know you have heard that before!
Oh Gaelic is worse than my bad Italian, and for those who have heard my Latin, my Italian is even worse. Actually i do not attempt Gaelic unless I hear it first.
Ok I am convinced... you know Lazy Mary. Yes this song makes Italians cringe and yes, I know the Italian accent version of it, and also I have heard the "drinking song" version which explains why Lazy Mary was sleeping so late and why she smokes in bed;)

Vale,
Julia


--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Lyn Dowling" <ldowling@...> wrote:
>
> Salve, Julia,
>
> When I was a kid and Lou Monte was entertaining at local Italian clubs,
> "Lazy Mary" was considered the bastardized version. But a few months back, I
> brought my little nephew to one of the local pizzerias, which had on the
> (Italian-language) recording and I starting singing along to it as a joke,
> which elicited free arrancini. I think we got it to shut me up.
>
> If they thought that was bad, they should hear me try the language of my
> ancestors: Gaelic.
>
> Vale,
> LAM
>
>
> _____
>
> From: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com [mailto:Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf
> Of L Julia Aquila
> Sent: Tuesday, June 09, 2009 2:53 PM
> To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Another little brag. . .
>
>
>
>
>
> Salve Amelia,
>
> Do we really want to go to the great Pizza debate*laughs* ya know the one:
> Is it or isn't it Italian? Now that is even more heated than the pasta
> debate;)
> Now you really did it! "che la luna menzzamara momma mia maradara, figumia
> lalalalala" Ok so I have never really known the words and made it up as i
> went along and it gets worse, way worse, and I will not torture Livia any
> further;)...
> You really were assimilated into the "inner circle" weren't you. You are a
> "grandfathered" paisana! I can do better on "Quando, Quando."
> You wouldn't know "Lazy Mary" would you? *laughs*
>
> Vale,
> Julia
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66556 From: marcushoratius Date: 2009-06-09
Subject: Re: Intercessio!
M. Moravius C. Cato s. p. d.

What you said below, that either Consul could have rejected Modianus' candidacy is true. The Custodes could have, as you say, refused to certify his election by some flaw. However, neither the Consules nor the Custodes did. And if the argument is thus that by accepting Modianus as a candidate they erred, then the time to do so would have been within seventy-two hours of the Consul announcing who had been accepted as candidates. Do so after the election was already held is contrary to the law. He must give his reason for why the election process itself, and/or the certification process was flawed. The issue over Modianus' candidacy expired before voting began.

Then, too, you forget who else was involved in this process, for tie votes of the Centuriata were decided by casting lots. Sortition is a matter under the prorogative of Jupiter Optimus Maximus. In the end He is the one who really decided the results. Thus it could be argued that the Tribunus defied not only the will of the People but also the will of the Gods, who apparently did not reject Modianus' candidacy or else They might have cast the lots in your favor.

At any rate, I don't agree that we are left with only one Censor really. If the intercessio stands then there will have to be a new election held. You cannot win by default, Cato, as you gained neither a majority of the Centuriata from the votes of the People, nor by the sortition overseen by the Gods.

If asked, I shall perform an augurium on whether the Gods have indeed accepted Modianus as Censor suffectus to confirm whether They approved of the sortition. It is a matter for the Augurs to consider.

Vale et vade in Deo




--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Gaius Equitius Cato" <mlcinnyc@...> wrote:
>
> Cato Moravio Piscino sal.
>
> Salve.
>
> Vipsanius' veto says that since the very basis upon which these results are being presented is flawed, and the basis upon which the consuls are accepting them is equally flawed, they cannot be either certified or accepted under our law. The analogy might be drawn between a manufacturer, a parts tester, and an inspector.
>
> Say a car is manufactured, and the brakes are faulty. The parts test results miss the flaw and it is passed. An inspector finds the fault in the brakes and returns the car to the manufacturer, saying that the testers were incorrect and that the car in is inherently flawed and cannot be driven. It doesn't matter if the publicity stills are in magazines already, or the ad campaign is in full swing, or even if the manufacturer has received tens of thousands of orders. If the car is flawed it cannot be driven.
>
> Certification and acceptance of the results are two more opportunities we have to protect the law of the Respublica; where they failed earlier, the tribunes can uphold the law in this instance. In fact, the custodes could have refused to certify the results on the same basis, that they are flawed by virtue of the candidate's inability to stand for the office. The consuls and praetors have the same opportunity, but it is clearly not in their interests (personal/political, that is, as following the law is demonstrably not within their concept of the well-being of the Respublica) to do so.
>
> Right now, by the virtue of the tribune's veto in accordance with our law, we have a sole censor in office, Galerius Paulinus.
>
> Vale,
>
> Cato
>
>
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "marcushoratius" <MHoratius@> wrote:
> >
> > Salve Cato
> >
> > The only problem with your reasoning here is the discrepency between Agrippa's veto against the actions of magistrates and the reasoning he gave behind it. The reasoning he gave really concerned the candidacy of Modianus, based on an interpretation by Sulla, Gnaeus Caesar, and Potitius as to the meaning of "consecutive." That was a misinterpretation IMHO. We are nearly six months into the year. The history behind the issue of electing suffecti in Nova Roma, even going back to the time when suffecti were appointed by the Senate, never considered "consecutive" in the way it has been misinterpreted by these few individuals for their own political reasons. The conflict here has nothing to do with the law. None the less...
> >
> > If the problem was in the candidacy then a Tribunus Plebis should have vetoed the candidacy before the Comitia met. That is, he could have vetoed the Consul's acceptance of the candidacy of someone he thought unqualified. That would allow other candidates to be reviewed and "certified" by the Consuls as eligible and the Tribuni given an opportunity to review the eligibility of all candidates prior to the Comitia assembling.
> >
> > However, Tribunus Agrippa vetoed the certification process conducted by the Custodes after the election. He gave no reason as to why he thought that process of certification was in error. Once the candidates were set, the Comitia having already concluded its voting, the issue of candidacies was over. To veto the Custodes over a candidacy is a non sequiter. So what, I would like to know, did the Tribunus see in error with the certification process itself to overthrow what the People had decided? If the Custodes found no error in the election process of the Comitia itself and therefore legally certified the results, then Agrippa's intercessio is without basis and should be withdrawn.
> >
> > Vale
> > M. Moravius Piscinus
> >
> > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Gaius Equitius Cato" <mlcinnyc@> wrote:
> > >
> > > Cato Galerio Aureliano sal.
> > >
> > > Salve.
> > >
> > > Your veto is incorrect, as is most of the argument surrounding this issue. Vipsanius Agrippa has not pronounced intercessio against the right of the People to hold or vote in elections, nor did he veto the results themselves (nor could he, as neither the act of voting nor the results of an election are acts of a magistrate). He has issued a veto against the certification of the results by the custodes and the acceptance of the results by the consuls, which *are* acts of magistrates, based on the fact that he believes the results reflect a violation of the Constitution.
> > >
> > > In point of fact a tribune *can* stop a vote or an election from happening in the first place - this is the law under Nova Roma and was actually practiced by the ancient Romans - so stopping an election or a vote on legislation is *not* un-Roman in the least. It is the assumption - and application - of current post-Enlightenment political theory that makes this seem "unfair", but the ancient Romans would have recognized it as perfectly valid.
> > >
> > > Those who beat the "be Roman, act Roman, follow the Romans" drum should understand that actual ancient Roman political practice was not really in any way democratic or "fair" by contemporary standards.
> > >
> > >
> > > Vale.
> > >
> > > Cato
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Robert Levee <galerius_of_rome@> wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Salve et salvete,
> > > >
> > > > "I, Appius Galerius Aurelianus, tribune of the Plebs,
> > > >
> > > > In application of the paragraph IV.A.7b.of the Constitution of Nova Roma,
> > > >
> > > > Considering the Constitution of Nova Roma and of the laws which applies it and
> > > > define the powers of the tribunes of the Plebs, especially in case of an intercessio,
> > > >
> > > > Considering the message nb 66421 issued in the Forum last Jun 7, 2009 4:32 pm by which
> > > > Tribune G. Vipsanius Agrippa has pronounced "intercessio against the custodes Marcus Lucretius Agricola and
> > > > Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus in certifying the election of Caeso Fabius Buteo
> > > > Modianus as censor and against the consuls Marcus Iulius Severus and Marcus
> > > > Cornelius Complutensis in accepting the election results",
> > > >
> > > > Considering that this intercessio violates the Constitution, and especially its
> > > > article II, B, 3,
> > > >
> > > > Hereby veto the intercession thrown by Tribune G. Vipsanius Agrippa last Jun 7, 2009 4:32 pm."
> > > >
> > > > I have quoted the article II, B, 3 of the constitution. There may be other arguments, but this one (the right of Novaromans to take part in elections) is one of the good grounds here, for a tribune should never be eager to make his own voice prevailing on the People's one.
> > > >
> > > > Vale et valete,
> > > > Ap.Galerius Aurelianus
> > > > Tribune of the Plebs
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66557 From: L Julia Aquila Date: 2009-06-09
Subject: Re: Another little brag. . .
Salve Livia,

This might give you a chuckle, and its an easy guess what the video is about:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KTT2-TNuegM

Vale,
Julia

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "livia_plauta" <livia.plauta@...> wrote:
>
> LOL! I give up!
> >
> > Salve Livia,
> >
> > In America you just might see a fish on bicycle *laugh* Ever hear the phrase "Only in America"?
> >
> > Vale
> > Julia
> >
> > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "livia_plauta" <livia.plauta@> wrote:
> > >
> > > Salvete,
> > > but which planet do you live on? Lasagna needs hard boiled egg like a fish needs a bicycle!
> > >
> > > Valete,
> > > Livia
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Sal.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > That sounds a lot more correct in my opinion, as the hard boiled egg is essential to the recipe :) Lasagna, too, should have hard boiled egg done properly as well as a few other staple dishes (like pizza rustica).
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Just quick because I'm interested in the Italian disaspora, but are you from the mid-west somewhere? I've read that America has a lot of northern Italians, or at least some, but they settled outside of the NY/New England area (where overwhelmingly most Italians reside.) Every "paesano" I know is southern Italian like myself (Calarese in my case.) The farthest north I've ever even seen is Abruzzi.
> > >
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66558 From: Lyn Dowling Date: 2009-06-09
Subject: Re: Another little brag. . .
Salve, Julia,
 
You know, songs like "Lazy Mary" are funny as inside jokes, but not too amusing otherwise. Can you imagine a song that goes, "Lazy Mary, will you get up? We need the sheets for the table," being released to a general market in this day and age?
 
Personally, I like the drinking version best too.
 
vale,
LAM


From: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com [mailto:Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of L Julia Aquila
Sent: Tuesday, June 09, 2009 3:23 PM
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Another little brag. . .

Salve Amelia!

So you're Irish! Well then you are an adopted Italian *laughs*. You know a marriage between Irish and Italians make the most beautiful children. I know you have heard that before!
Oh Gaelic is worse than my bad Italian, and for those who have heard my Latin, my Italian is even worse. Actually i do not attempt Gaelic unless I hear it first.
Ok I am convinced... you know Lazy Mary. Yes this song makes Italians cringe and yes, I know the Italian accent version of it, and also I have heard the "drinking song" version which explains why Lazy Mary was sleeping so late and why she smokes in bed;)

Vale,
Julia

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com, "Lyn Dowling" <ldowling@.. .> wrote:
>
> Salve, Julia,
>
> When I was a kid and Lou Monte was entertaining at local Italian clubs,
> "Lazy Mary" was considered the bastardized version. But a few months back, I
> brought my little nephew to one of the local pizzerias, which had on the
> (Italian-language) recording and I starting singing along to it as a joke,
> which elicited free arrancini. I think we got it to shut me up.
>
> If they thought that was bad, they should hear me try the language of my
> ancestors: Gaelic.
>
> Vale,
> LAM
>
>
> _____
>
> From: Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com [mailto:Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com] On Behalf
> Of L Julia Aquila
> Sent: Tuesday, June 09, 2009 2:53 PM
> To: Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com
> Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Another little brag. . .
>
>
>
>
>
> Salve Amelia,
>
> Do we really want to go to the great Pizza debate*laughs* ya know the one:
> Is it or isn't it Italian? Now that is even more heated than the pasta
> debate;)
> Now you really did it! "che la luna menzzamara momma mia maradara, figumia
> lalalalala" Ok so I have never really known the words and made it up as i
> went along and it gets worse, way worse, and I will not torture Livia any
> further;)...
> You really were assimilated into the "inner circle" weren't you. You are a
> "grandfathered" paisana! I can do better on "Quando, Quando."
> You wouldn't know "Lazy Mary" would you? *laughs*
>
> Vale,
> Julia

No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 8.5.339 / Virus Database: 270.12.59/2165 - Release Date: 06/09/09 05:53:00

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66559 From: aerdensrw Date: 2009-06-09
Subject: Re: Another little brag. . .
You guys are making me so hungry!

My father's parents' families came from Bisacquino, Sicily. Interestingly, they arrived in America through the port at Galveston instead of through Ellis Island.

I've never heard of putting boiled egg in lasagna. That's different. We make it pretty much the same way as Julia's family makes it, except my Mom puts bell peppers in it (blech!).

Bracciole is a new dish, to me. I grew up eating fenocchi, which is fried fennel, along with fried/breaded cauliflower and fried eggplant. I'm not fond of Italian sausage because of the caraway or fennel seeds. My Dad also makes homemade canoli, but he makes a cream filling instead of using ricotta cheese.

Paulla Corva

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "L Julia Aquila" <dis_pensible@...> wrote:
>
> Salve!
>
> I am having a bit of a problem posting, keep getting errors, so I will try this again.
> Nonononono, I cannot abide hard boiled eggs in Lasagna*laugh* however I will concede to using eggs in the preparation of the ricotta for the Lasagna. My famiglia makes a very plain Lasagna: Lasagna noodles, Ricotta, Pecorino Roman, lots of Mozzarella, Tomato Meat sauce, garlic, oregano, basil and pepper. Although I have blasphemed and added mushrooms. Our usual cuisine did not include a lot of pasta but well seasoned meats and fresh vegetables that were mostly roasted, broiled or baked.
> My Grandfather's settled in NYC when they were very young in the late 1800's then later married and raised their families on Long Island, Nassau County although we do have relatives in Suffolk. We also have relatives out West also. I am, alas, a native New Yorker, one of the many Italoamericani.
> Even though many immigrants were from Naples and Sicily, Liguria and Veneto followed in the statistics. Many reasons for immigration including political. I am not so sure why Naples tops Sicily except perhaps this was due to the fact that Naples was the port of departure for many immigrants in other parts of Italy. Others left Italy from France. Not all came through Ellis Island either as was the case with some of my ancestors.
> It always so nice to speak with people of similar heritage, we come from such a rich history and culture.
>
> Vale,
> Julia
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66560 From: Jesse Corradino Date: 2009-06-09
Subject: Re: Another little brag. . .
That isn't true at all.  Everyone I know makes lasagna with hard boiled eggs crumbled through it.  Maybe they don't make it that way in the Oliver Garden or down south, but I have an entire chunk of Calabria to back me up on this.
 
> To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> From: livia.plauta@...
> Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2009 17:08:56 +0000
> Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Another little brag. . .
>
> Salvete,
> but which planet do you live on? Lasagna needs hard boiled egg like a fish needs a bicycle!
>
> Valete,
> Livia
> >
> >
> > Sal.
> >
> >
> >
> > That sounds a lot more correct in my opinion, as the hard boiled egg is essential to the recipe :) Lasagna, too, should have hard boiled egg done properly as well as a few other staple dishes (like pizza rustica).
> >
> >
> >
> > Just quick because I'm interested in the Italian disaspora, but are you from the mid-west somewhere? I've read that America has a lot of northern Italians, or at least some, but they settled outside of the NY/New England area (where overwhelmingly most Italians reside.) Every "paesano" I know is southern Italian like myself (Calarese in my case.) The farthest north I've ever even seen is Abruzzi.
> >
> >
> >
> > Best
> >
> > > To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> > > From: dis_pensible@...
> > > Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2009 14:47:17 +0000
> > > Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Another little brag. . .
> > >
> > > Salvete,
> > >
> > > I think I am going to make Bracciole this weekend, I think I am now *compelled* to make it!
> > > Bracciole is not just Sicilian although I think most Americans are oriented to Sicilian Italian Americans because of the Media and because of the many immigrants from that beautiful area. However, my maternal grandparents from the north, Nonny (or Grandmere as we referred to her respectfully outside of family) was from the Ligurian region and Poppy (Grandpere) was from the foothills of the Italian Alps. My Paternal Grandfather was from the L'Aquila region and my maternal Grandmother was from the seaside not far from Rome. Here are other recipes for Bracciole with a bit of information, also note the different spellings- and the different ingredients:
> > > http://recipegal.com/Italian/Bracciole.htm
> > > http://italianfood.about.com/od/beefbracioleetc/Beef_Veal_Braciole_Involtini_Steaks_Etc.htm
> > > I use about 2 pounds of thinly sliced, enough to make approx six large thin slices, and well beaten, or tenderized round steak, 8 cloves of chopped garlic, one very thinly sliced red onion, one very thinly sliced green bell pepper, about 2/3 cup of Pecorino Romano grated cheese, approx four cups of breadcrumbs, oregano, sweet basil, salt and pepper and four sliced hard boiled eggs. Mix all the ingredients except for the eggs, spread the mixture over the meat, place the eggs on top of the breadcrumb mixture, roll them up, tuck in the ends, tie them with string. Fry them in olive oil until they are nicely browned, then toss them in huge pot of tomato sauce and let them simmer until they are super tender. This makes about six servings, more if you are serving pasta also.
> > > As to the regional differences all I can say is vive la différence!
> > >
> > > Valete,
> > > Julia
> > >
> > >
> > > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Publius Ullerius Stephanus Venator <famila.ulleria.venii@> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Salvete;
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 12:26 AM, Jesse Corradino wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > The recipe in the link looks weird to me. My family is from Catanzaro so
> > > > > maybe our recipe isn't properly sicilian (which is where I think the dish
> > > > > comes from) so we make a different version of brazghul (phonetic sp,
> > > > > obviously) that consists of hard boiled eggs, romano cheese, salt, pepper,
> > > > > parsely, and garlic. Have your butcher tenderize some top round cuts
> > > > > and roll all of the ingredients into the steak. Tooth pick or butcher tie
> > > > > and simmer in lard or oil in a pan until brown. I cook it extra with a
> > > > > fresh marinara after the brazghul is already browned for about a half hour
> > > > > or until my sauce is reduced. My coup de grace is to serve the sauce with
> > > > > spinach ravioli instead of just eating the brazghul by itself.
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > Regional difference: Great grandma Mastroianni (nee Riciardelli) was
> > > > born in Avellino, Campagna about 1891. Came to America as the result
> > > > of an arranged marriage. She refused to wed, as the prospective groom
> > > > was too short. She demanded, and got, her dowry back; found her own
> > > > husband. 9 of her 10 children made it to adulthood and marriages of
> > > > their own.
> > > >
> > > > Both Nonnie and Papa showed me how to cook; she the Camganian style of
> > > > her upbringing, him the Abruzzese.
> > > >
> > > > =====================================
> > > > In amicitia et fide
> > > > Publius Ullerius Stephanus Venator
> > > > Civis circa Quintilis MMDCCLI a.u.c.
> > > > Patrician, Paterfamilias
> > > > Religio Septentrionalis - Poeta
> > > >
> > > > Dominus Sodalitas Coquuorum et Cerevisiae Coctorum
> > > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Sodalis_Coq_et_Coq/
> > > >
> > > > http://www.myspace.com/venator_poetus
> > > > http://anheathenreader.blogspot.com/
> > > > http://www.catamount-grange-hearth.org/
> > > > http://www.cafepress.com/catamountgrange
> > > > --
> > > > May the Holy Powers smile on our efforts.
> > > > May the Spirits of our family lines nod in approval.
> > > > May we be of Worth to our fellow Nova Romans.
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > ------------------------------------
> > >
> > > Yahoo! Groups Links
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> > _________________________________________________________________
> > Windows Liveâ„¢ SkyDriveâ„¢: Get 25 GB of free online storage.
> > http://windowslive.com/online/skydrive?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_SD_25GB_062009
> >
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
> <*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma/
>
> <*> Your email settings:
> Individual Email | Traditional
>
> <*> To change settings online go to:
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma/join
> (Yahoo! ID required)
>
> <*> To change settings via email:
> mailto:Nova-Roma-digest@yahoogroups.com
> mailto:Nova-Roma-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com
>
> <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
> <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
> http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>


Insert movie times and more without leaving Hotmail®. See how.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66561 From: aerdensrw Date: 2009-06-09
Subject: Re: Another little brag. . .
P. Corva L. Aemiliae sal.

If you want awesome focaccia, come to Collina's Restaurant in Houston on 19th Street. Best focaccia I've ever eaten, and my Dad would come there just for the bread, if his diet would allow that. (g)

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Lyn Dowling" <ldowling@...> wrote:
>
> Salve, Julia,
>
> Stracciatelle/stracciatella is the wonderful Italian version of egg drop
> soup.
>
> I'll grant you, things are not that bad here, culinary wise. We are growing
> up. But Italian-wise? We transplants would kill for a loaf of good bread.
>
> vale,
> L. Aemilia
> (trying to write a food story this minute)
>
>
> _____
>
> From: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com [mailto:Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf
> Of L Julia Aquila
> Sent: Tuesday, June 09, 2009 1:05 PM
> To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Another little brag. . .
>
>
>
>
>
> Salve Amelia,
>
> Ack!!! *laughs* Ok I got most of them but what is "sdrahjadel." Ok how do
> you say Mozzarella? Matzarella, Mootsarella or Mootsarell?
> I am so wishing for a plateful of what you just said;)
> If you think Florida is bad, come to Nashville. We have one decent Italian
> restaurant that has an actual Italian chef. The others are either chains or
> something resembling Italian. I am not even going to get into the
> pronunciation...
>
> Vale,
> Julia
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogrou <mailto:Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com> ps.com, "Lyn
> Dowling" <ldowling@> wrote:
> >
> > Salvete omnes,
> >
> > My family eats a lot of brazhol; mannihgowt and sdrahjadel too. We also
> > order brihzhut, mootzadel and mordadel.* ;-)
> >
> > That's because we were raised in Northern New Jersey, with its large
> number
> > of Sicilian-Americans and their linguistic shortcuts. Order "man-i-cotti"
> at
> > a restaurant up there and the waiter knows you know nothing; order
> > "mannihgowt" and he knows you're serious. Here in
> > white-bread-in-plastic-bag Florida, it's the opposite. Italian
> restaurateurs
> > here hug you if they think you actually know what you're about to eat.
> >
> > Now I'm hungry.
> >
> > vale,
> > L. Aemilia
> >
> > * Brasciole, manicotti, stracciatella . . . prosciutto, mozzarella and
> > mortadella
> >
> > PS -- Thanks for the etymology, Livia. I always thought the root for
> > "brasciole"/"braciole" was "brasato," as in "braised."
> >
> >
> > _____
> >
> > From: Nova-Roma@yahoogrou <mailto:Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com> ps.com
> [mailto:Nova-Roma@yahoogrou <mailto:Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com> ps.com] On
> Behalf
> > Of livia_plauta
> > Sent: Tuesday, June 09, 2009 12:09 PM
> > To: Nova-Roma@yahoogrou <mailto:Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com> ps.com
> > Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Another little brag. . .
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Salve,
> > Braciole literally just means (pork) "ribs", so it's natural to find
> > thousands of different recipes for them.
> > But "brazghul" looks like Turkish to me. Please! "Braciole" is pronounced
> > "bra-cho-lay".
> >
> > Vale,
> > Livia
> > >
> > >
> > > The recipe in the link looks weird to me. My family is from Catanzaro so
> > maybe our recipe isn't properly sicilian (which is where I think the dish
> > comes from) so we make a different version of brazghul (phonetic sp,
> > obviously) that consists of hard boiled eggs, romano cheese, salt, pepper,
> > parsely, and garlic. Have your butcher tenderize some top round cuts and
> > roll all of the ingredients into the steak. Tooth pick or butcher tie and
> > simmer in lard or oil in a pan until brown. I cook it extra with a fresh
> > marinara after the brazghul is already browned for about a half hour or
> > until my sauce is reduced. My coup de grace is to serve the sauce with
> > spinach ravioli instead of just eating the brazghul by itself.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > > To: Nova-Roma@yahoogrou <mailto:Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com> ps.com
> > > > From: famila.ulleria.venii@
> > > > Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2009 19:02:34 -0500
> > > > Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: Another little brag. . .
> > > >
> > > > Ave Maior;
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 6:06 PM, Maior<rory12001@> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Salvete Venator Juliaque;
> > > > > ecastor I'm hungry, I had no nonna and instead got chicken soup a
> poor
> > > > > second in my opinion to Italian cuisine;-) So thank you for sharing
> > and I'd
> > > > > love more recipes from our cives. Food definitely is something we
> > should be
> > > > > discussing in the forum!
> > > > > bene vale
> > > > > Maior
> > > > >
> > > > > here is the link to the NRwiki! add more recipes omnes:)
> > > > > http://www.novaroma <http://www.novaroma
> <http://www.novaroma.org/nr/Bracciola> .org/nr/Bracciola>
> > .org/nr/Bracciola
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > I think if you and I can keep discussions to matters of plate and cup,
> > > > we might just have common ground after all ,-)
> > > >
> > > > Just for you then, Nonnie D'Orazio's Zuppa Jennie (named after her
> > > > mother, Giovannia Mastroianni, nee Riciardelli), know elsewhere as
> > > > Italian Wedding Soup. . .a term I had not heard until after I'd moved
> > > > to Illinois in 1996, 39 years after I'd been born .-)
> > > >
> > > > Foodstuffs: 4 qt home made chicken stock, 1# ea ground chicken and
> > > > veal, 1/2 c dried bread - finely grated, 2 lg chicken eggs - beaten, 1
> > > > t ea dried oregano, basil and parsley - rubbed to small particles, 6
> > > > cloves garlic - crushed, 1 t ea salt and fresh-ground black pepper, 2
> > > > c long grain rice, 2 c ea spinach, escarole, endive and leek - coarse
> > > > chopped and a bowl of freshly shredded Asiago d'allevo or
> > > > Parmigiano-Reggiano for garnishing
> > > >
> > > > Method: While bringing the stock to a boil, mix well the ground
> > > > meats, bread crumbs, eggs, herbs, garlic, salt and pepper. Shape mix
> > > > into small balls, about the size of chestnuts. Drop a few at a time
> > > > into the boiling stock, so as to not reduce the temperature; cook
> > > > about 10 minutes. Stir in the rice and cook an additional 15 minutes.
> > > > Stir in the greens and cook 15 more minutes.
> > > >
> > > > Serve in a wide, shallow soup bowl with a libel sprinkling of cheese.
> > > >
> > > > Side dishes, if this is the main course; fresh baked bread with butter
> > > > and a mix of string beans and summer squash - steamed and dressed with
> > > > balsamic vinegar mixed with a bit of brown mustard.
> > > >
> > > > Vale - Venator
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > ------------------------------------
> > > >
> > > > Yahoo! Groups Links
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > > __________________________________________________________
> > > Windows LiveT: Keep your life in sync.
> > > http://windowslive.
> > <http://windowslive.
> <http://windowslive.com/explore?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_BR_life_in_synch_062009>
> com/explore?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_BR_life_in_synch_062009>
> > com/explore?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_BR_life_in_synch_062009
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > No virus found in this incoming message.
> > Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> > Version: 8.5.339 / Virus Database: 270.12.59/2165 - Release Date: 06/09/09
> > 05:53:00
> >
>
>
>
>
>
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> Version: 8.5.339 / Virus Database: 270.12.59/2165 - Release Date: 06/09/09
> 05:53:00
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66562 From: Jesse Corradino Date: 2009-06-09
Subject: Re: Another little brag. . .
What is with the intermingling of Italians and Irish?  I was born in 1981 and was aware at least of a stereotype that Irish and Italians were enemies, yet everyone in my family now (including me) is married to someone that's Irish.  Moreover, I see this with many other people besides my family.  Is it religious?  Natural attraction?  What :)
 
> To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> From: dis_pensible@...
> Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2009 19:22:40 +0000
> Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Another little brag. . .
>
> Salve Amelia!
>
> So you're Irish! Well then you are an adopted Italian *laughs*. You know a marriage between Irish and Italians make the most beautiful children. I know you have heard that before!
> Oh Gaelic is worse than my bad Italian, and for those who have heard my Latin, my Italian is even worse. Actually i do not attempt Gaelic unless I hear it first.
> Ok I am convinced... you know Lazy Mary. Yes this song makes Italians cringe and yes, I know the Italian accent version of it, and also I have heard the "drinking song" version which explains why Lazy Mary was sleeping so late and why she smokes in bed;)
>
> Vale,
> Julia
>
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Lyn Dowling" <ldowling@...> wrote:
> >
> > Salve, Julia,
> >
> > When I was a kid and Lou Monte was entertaining at local Italian clubs,
> > "Lazy Mary" was considered the bastardized version. But a few months back, I
> > brought my little nephew to one of the local pizzerias, which had on the
> > (Italian-language) recording and I starting singing along to it as a joke,
> > which elicited free arrancini. I think we got it to shut me up.
> >
> > If they thought that was bad, they should hear me try the language of my
> > ancestors: Gaelic.
> >
> > Vale,
> > LAM
> >
> >
> > _____
> >
> > From: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com [mailto:Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf
> > Of L Julia Aquila
> > Sent: Tuesday, June 09, 2009 2:53 PM
> > To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> > Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Another little brag. . .
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Salve Amelia,
> >
> > Do we really want to go to the great Pizza debate*laughs* ya know the one:
> > Is it or isn't it Italian? Now that is even more heated than the pasta
> > debate;)
> > Now you really did it! "che la luna menzzamara momma mia maradara, figumia
> > lalalalala" Ok so I have never really known the words and made it up as i
> > went along and it gets worse, way worse, and I will not torture Livia any
> > further;)...
> > You really were assimilated into the "inner circle" weren't you. You are a
> > "grandfathered" paisana! I can do better on "Quando, Quando."
> > You wouldn't know "Lazy Mary" would you? *laughs*
> >
> > Vale,
> > Julia
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
> <*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma/
>
> <*> Your email settings:
> Individual Email | Traditional
>
> <*> To change settings online go to:
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma/join
> (Yahoo! ID required)
>
> <*> To change settings via email:
> mailto:Nova-Roma-digest@yahoogroups.com
> mailto:Nova-Roma-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com
>
> <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
> <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
> http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>


Lauren found her dream laptop. Find the PC that’s right for you.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66563 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2009-06-09
Subject: Re: Intercessio!
Cato Moravio Piscino sal.

salve.

Interesting points, but I think you're missing the basis of my understanding. The acts of the rogatores (not the custodes) and consuls earlier in the process is, as you point out, at this point a matter of fact. This does not, however, restrict the tribunes from forbidding a later, current act.

The one thread binding the whole argument together is the question of the legitimacy of the candidacy; whether or not it was applied earlier is of no consequence; the tribune is applying it now, as is his right - obligation, even, if he believes that the Constitution has been undermined.

With all due respect, since Modianus is a member of the College of Augurs, having that college contemplate his legitimacy is a little bit ... incestuous.

Iuppiter O.M. is certainly able to take care of Himself; have you considered that the fairly clear argument against Modianus' candidacy might be His way of telling us that He's not pleased with it?

As we stand right now there is, as I said, only one censor; the veto puts us in the position of the election results never having been brought to the consuls and the consuls never having accepted them.

I did *not* say - nor do I say now, nor will I *ever* say - that I win "by default". If the tribunician veto is upheld, we will be required to hold new elections. If that is the case, I will certainly not stand since although a number of centuries supported me it is more important, I think, that we turn to someone against whom there is felt no ill-will for whatever reason, justified or not.

Vale,

Cato


--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "marcushoratius" <MHoratius@...> wrote:
>
> M. Moravius C. Cato s. p. d.
>
> What you said below, that either Consul could have rejected Modianus' candidacy is true. The Custodes could have, as you say, refused to certify his election by some flaw. However, neither the Consules nor the Custodes did. And if the argument is thus that by accepting Modianus as a candidate they erred, then the time to do so would have been within seventy-two hours of the Consul announcing who had been accepted as candidates. Do so after the election was already held is contrary to the law. He must give his reason for why the election process itself, and/or the certification process was flawed. The issue over Modianus' candidacy expired before voting began.
>
> Then, too, you forget who else was involved in this process, for tie votes of the Centuriata were decided by casting lots. Sortition is a matter under the prorogative of Jupiter Optimus Maximus. In the end He is the one who really decided the results. Thus it could be argued that the Tribunus defied not only the will of the People but also the will of the Gods, who apparently did not reject Modianus' candidacy or else They might have cast the lots in your favor.
>
> At any rate, I don't agree that we are left with only one Censor really. If the intercessio stands then there will have to be a new election held. You cannot win by default, Cato, as you gained neither a majority of the Centuriata from the votes of the People, nor by the sortition overseen by the Gods.
>
> If asked, I shall perform an augurium on whether the Gods have indeed accepted Modianus as Censor suffectus to confirm whether They approved of the sortition. It is a matter for the Augurs to consider.
>
> Vale et vade in Deo
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66564 From: L Julia Aquila Date: 2009-06-09
Subject: Re: Another little brag. . .
Salve,

Well, I don't know;) But some of the country songs are pretty misogynistic, actually come to think of it, today's rap and rock are also. The Lou Monte version you mentioned was recorded in 1958, so I think the mindset was different then - but on the cusp of change. Here is something interesting, including a bit about the risque side:
http://www.bobshannon.com/stories/lazymary.html

And..shhh I was not to know about the risque side;)

Vale,
Julia



--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Lyn Dowling" <ldowling@...> wrote:
>
> Salve, Julia,
>
> You know, songs like "Lazy Mary" are funny as inside jokes, but not too
> amusing otherwise. Can you imagine a song that goes, "Lazy Mary, will you
> get up? We need the sheets for the table," being released to a general
> market in this day and age?
>
> Personally, I like the drinking version best too.
>
> vale,
> LAM
>
>
> _____
>
> From: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com [mailto:Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf
> Of L Julia Aquila
> Sent: Tuesday, June 09, 2009 3:23 PM
> To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Another little brag. . .
>
>
>
>
>
> Salve Amelia!
>
> So you're Irish! Well then you are an adopted Italian *laughs*. You know a
> marriage between Irish and Italians make the most beautiful children. I know
> you have heard that before!
> Oh Gaelic is worse than my bad Italian, and for those who have heard my
> Latin, my Italian is even worse. Actually i do not attempt Gaelic unless I
> hear it first.
> Ok I am convinced... you know Lazy Mary. Yes this song makes Italians cringe
> and yes, I know the Italian accent version of it, and also I have heard the
> "drinking song" version which explains why Lazy Mary was sleeping so late
> and why she smokes in bed;)
>
> Vale,
> Julia
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogrou <mailto:Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com> ps.com, "Lyn
> Dowling" <ldowling@> wrote:
> >
> > Salve, Julia,
> >
> > When I was a kid and Lou Monte was entertaining at local Italian clubs,
> > "Lazy Mary" was considered the bastardized version. But a few months back,
> I
> > brought my little nephew to one of the local pizzerias, which had on the
> > (Italian-language) recording and I starting singing along to it as a joke,
> > which elicited free arrancini. I think we got it to shut me up.
> >
> > If they thought that was bad, they should hear me try the language of my
> > ancestors: Gaelic.
> >
> > Vale,
> > LAM
> >
> >
> > _____
> >
> > From: Nova-Roma@yahoogrou <mailto:Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com> ps.com
> [mailto:Nova-Roma@yahoogrou <mailto:Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com> ps.com] On
> Behalf
> > Of L Julia Aquila
> > Sent: Tuesday, June 09, 2009 2:53 PM
> > To: Nova-Roma@yahoogrou <mailto:Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com> ps.com
> > Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Another little brag. . .
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Salve Amelia,
> >
> > Do we really want to go to the great Pizza debate*laughs* ya know the one:
> > Is it or isn't it Italian? Now that is even more heated than the pasta
> > debate;)
> > Now you really did it! "che la luna menzzamara momma mia maradara, figumia
> > lalalalala" Ok so I have never really known the words and made it up as i
> > went along and it gets worse, way worse, and I will not torture Livia any
> > further;)...
> > You really were assimilated into the "inner circle" weren't you. You are a
> > "grandfathered" paisana! I can do better on "Quando, Quando."
> > You wouldn't know "Lazy Mary" would you? *laughs*
> >
> > Vale,
> > Julia
>
>
>
>
>
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> Version: 8.5.339 / Virus Database: 270.12.59/2165 - Release Date: 06/09/09
> 05:53:00
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66565 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2009-06-09
Subject: Fwd: Yahoo! Groups downtime this Thursday (June 11, 2009)
Salvete omnes,

Forwarded FYI.

-- Marinus

----- Forwarded message from gordonst@... -----
Date: Tue, 09 Jun 2009 20:43:13 -0000
From: gordon_groups_pm <gordonst@...>
Reply-To: moderatorcentral-owner@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [moderatorcentral] Yahoo! Groups downtime this Thursday
(June 11, 2009)
To: moderatorcentral@yahoogroups.com

This Thursday (June 11th, 2009) Yahoo! Groups will be undergoing
maintenance. During this time 50% of groups will be unavailable for up
to an hour. The outage is scheduled to begin some time between 2 and 3
pm PT (10-11 pm GMT).

While the maintenance is going on, all features of affected groups,
including messages, photos, attachments, etc. will be completely
unavailable. However, once the outage concludes, any messages that
were posted to these groups via email during this downtime will be
distributed.

For more information (or to comment), see this blog post:
http://tinyurl.com/20090611downtime
http://www.ygroupsblog.com/blog/2009/06/09/planned-outage-thursday-june-11-2009/

Thanks, and our apologies for any inconvenience the downtime may cause.

- Gordon
Yahoo! Groups

P.S. Remember that neither commenting nor replying to this message
will get you help for problems you are experiencing with your group.
The ONLY way to get help from Yahoo! is to contact Customer Care:
http://tinyurl.com/contactCC
http://help.yahoo.com/l/us/yahoo/groups/original/ownmod/forms/forms_index.html
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66566 From: L Julia Aquila Date: 2009-06-09
Subject: Re: Another little brag. . .
Salve Paulla,

For those tracing their families, not coming through Ellis island poses a huge problem. Very interesting, did you have any problems getting their records?

Hey I like bell peppers and eat them raw, sliced, but just as they are;)
I like fried eggplant, another "holiday food" along with Garduna which is fried Burdock, of course I cannot find it here but i do have the recipe and I think it is similar in flavor to fried fennel except it looks like celery:
Garduna
Baby Burdock [before it develops stickers, looks like small celery stocks]
Parboil and cut into 5' pieces
Dip in flour, egg and seasoned breadcrumbs
Fry in Olive Oil until brown then place on kitchen towels to drain excess oil off, serve hot.

I tried to make fried eggplant but it...disintegrated;) But I have made a good Mousakka! Of course that is Greek and maybe the Ouzo made it better;)

I like mild Italian sausage, with onions and peppers! But I rarely eat it anymore.

How about Escarole soup?

Vale,
Julia




--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "aerdensrw" <aerdensrw@...> wrote:
>
> You guys are making me so hungry!
>
> My father's parents' families came from Bisacquino, Sicily. Interestingly, they arrived in America through the port at Galveston instead of through Ellis Island.
>
> I've never heard of putting boiled egg in lasagna. That's different. We make it pretty much the same way as Julia's family makes it, except my Mom puts bell peppers in it (blech!).
>
> Bracciole is a new dish, to me. I grew up eating fenocchi, which is fried fennel, along with fried/breaded cauliflower and fried eggplant. I'm not fond of Italian sausage because of the caraway or fennel seeds. My Dad also makes homemade canoli, but he makes a cream filling instead of using ricotta cheese.
>
> Paulla Corva
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "L Julia Aquila" <dis_pensible@> wrote:
> >
> > Salve!
> >
> > I am having a bit of a problem posting, keep getting errors, so I will try this again.
> > Nonononono, I cannot abide hard boiled eggs in Lasagna*laugh* however I will concede to using eggs in the preparation of the ricotta for the Lasagna. My famiglia makes a very plain Lasagna: Lasagna noodles, Ricotta, Pecorino Roman, lots of Mozzarella, Tomato Meat sauce, garlic, oregano, basil and pepper. Although I have blasphemed and added mushrooms. Our usual cuisine did not include a lot of pasta but well seasoned meats and fresh vegetables that were mostly roasted, broiled or baked.
> > My Grandfather's settled in NYC when they were very young in the late 1800's then later married and raised their families on Long Island, Nassau County although we do have relatives in Suffolk. We also have relatives out West also. I am, alas, a native New Yorker, one of the many Italoamericani.
> > Even though many immigrants were from Naples and Sicily, Liguria and Veneto followed in the statistics. Many reasons for immigration including political. I am not so sure why Naples tops Sicily except perhaps this was due to the fact that Naples was the port of departure for many immigrants in other parts of Italy. Others left Italy from France. Not all came through Ellis Island either as was the case with some of my ancestors.
> > It always so nice to speak with people of similar heritage, we come from such a rich history and culture.
> >
> > Vale,
> > Julia
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66567 From: L Julia Aquila Date: 2009-06-09
Subject: Re: Another little brag. . .
Salve,

I was wondering if anyone would catch that! Now you are a lot younger than I am and I am surprised that stereotype still persists but the line about "the beautiful children", was a positive offering for what old fasioned Italians and Irish often thought was the end of the world;)
As to why, I dunno, my family is the United Nations but this is because my Mother in particular was Americanized and she made a concerted effort to make sure her children were also. I never really gave a thought as to the nationality of anyone I dated or married. But I had a Cousin who was much older and of a previous generation who did marry a lovely Irish woman, and some of the older women on his mother's side always made her feel like an outcast and this is the reason why they had holidays with my branch of the family. We didn't see differences.

The more things change the more things stay the same.

Vale,
Julia

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Jesse Corradino <woden66@...> wrote:
>
>
> What is with the intermingling of Italians and Irish? I was born in 1981 and was aware at least of a stereotype that Irish and Italians were enemies, yet everyone in my family now (including me) is married to someone that's Irish. Moreover, I see this with many other people besides my family. Is it religious? Natural attraction? What :)
>
> > To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> > From: dis_pensible@...
> > Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2009 19:22:40 +0000
> > Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Another little brag. . .
> >
> > Salve Amelia!
> >
> > So you're Irish! Well then you are an adopted Italian *laughs*. You know a marriage between Irish and Italians make the most beautiful children. I know you have heard that before!
> > Oh Gaelic is worse than my bad Italian, and for those who have heard my Latin, my Italian is even worse. Actually i do not attempt Gaelic unless I hear it first.
> > Ok I am convinced... you know Lazy Mary. Yes this song makes Italians cringe and yes, I know the Italian accent version of it, and also I have heard the "drinking song" version which explains why Lazy Mary was sleeping so late and why she smokes in bed;)
> >
> > Vale,
> > Julia
> >
> >
> > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Lyn Dowling" <ldowling@> wrote:
> > >
> > > Salve, Julia,
> > >
> > > When I was a kid and Lou Monte was entertaining at local Italian clubs,
> > > "Lazy Mary" was considered the bastardized version. But a few months back, I
> > > brought my little nephew to one of the local pizzerias, which had on the
> > > (Italian-language) recording and I starting singing along to it as a joke,
> > > which elicited free arrancini. I think we got it to shut me up.
> > >
> > > If they thought that was bad, they should hear me try the language of my
> > > ancestors: Gaelic.
> > >
> > > Vale,
> > > LAM
> > >
> > >
> > > _____
> > >
> > > From: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com [mailto:Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf
> > > Of L Julia Aquila
> > > Sent: Tuesday, June 09, 2009 2:53 PM
> > > To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> > > Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Another little brag. . .
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Salve Amelia,
> > >
> > > Do we really want to go to the great Pizza debate*laughs* ya know the one:
> > > Is it or isn't it Italian? Now that is even more heated than the pasta
> > > debate;)
> > > Now you really did it! "che la luna menzzamara momma mia maradara, figumia
> > > lalalalala" Ok so I have never really known the words and made it up as i
> > > went along and it gets worse, way worse, and I will not torture Livia any
> > > further;)...
> > > You really were assimilated into the "inner circle" weren't you. You are a
> > > "grandfathered" paisana! I can do better on "Quando, Quando."
> > > You wouldn't know "Lazy Mary" would you? *laughs*
> > >
> > > Vale,
> > > Julia
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------------
> >
> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Lauren found her dream laptop. Find the PC that's right for you.
> http://www.microsoft.com/windows/choosepc/?ocid=ftp_val_wl_290
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66568 From: L Julia Aquila Date: 2009-06-09
Subject: Re: Another little brag. . .
Salve Jesse,

I have seen so many different kinds of Lasagna, including "white" Lasagna, which is...well... different. I am not crazy about chicken or meatballs in my Lasagna either.
But hey, if you made Lasagna with crumbled eggs I would probably eat it;)...and like it.
I have enjoyed many dishes in different regions of Italy with the same names but sometimes they differed in ingredients and preparation (Braciole is one of them). I remember sumptuous eggplant and fish dishes in Calabria, but it has been a while.
I think that is one of the wonderful and enriching aspects of living in an area with a diverse population are the differences. I do draw the line at tomato sauce made from Ketchup though.*laugh* Or...cottage cheese in Lasagna rather than Ricotta.
Ok there is theme here. I like Ricotta;) In fact as soon as I build up the courage i am going to try and make my own.

Vale,
Julia



--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Jesse Corradino <woden66@...> wrote:
>
>
> That isn't true at all. Everyone I know makes lasagna with hard boiled eggs crumbled through it. Maybe they don't make it that way in the Oliver Garden or down south, but I have an entire chunk of Calabria to back me up on this.
>
> > To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> > From: livia.plauta@...
> > Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2009 17:08:56 +0000
> > Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Another little brag. . .
> >
> > Salvete,
> > but which planet do you live on? Lasagna needs hard boiled egg like a fish needs a bicycle!
> >
> > Valete,
> > Livia
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66569 From: Publius Ullerius Stephanus Venator Date: 2009-06-09
Subject: Re: Another little brag. . .
Avete;

Wow!

45 posts of positive discussion =)

A few scattershot remarks. . .

My mom is (as I wrote) American of Italian descent.

Papa D'Orazio was born in Castelmauro, Campobasso, Abruzzi-Molise,
Italy. Despite the Italian government splitting his home region off
into Moilse Province in 1964, he considers himself Abruzzese because
that is where his paternal grandparents were born, in Civitella Messer
Raimondo, Chieti, Abruzzo, Italy and his maternal side (LaFratta) are
natives of Castelmauro. Papa is 98 today.

Nonnie D'Orazio, nee Mastroianni, was born here. Her father was born
in Castel di Sasso, Caserta, Campania; my mom's cousin Mike
Mastroianni journeyed back there several years ago and got in touch
with the cousins, who still live in the old family home. Her mother,
Giovanina Riciardelli, was born in Avellino, Avellino, Campania. The
Mastroiannis have been in Castel di Sasso since 1542, when Maestro
Giovanni di Agnone (Agnone being a city in Abruzzi) was hired on as
gold smith to the lord of the manor there in Sasso.

My mom married a half Irish boy, Stewart, whose mother was 100% Irish,
back to Cu Chulainn; if family lore is to be taken as "gospel." When
she first brought him to visit her Nonnie and Papa Mastroianni, great
grandma wouldn't talk to, or see, my mom for 6 months.. "What for you
bring an "Irish boy" into my house?" is the quote my mom gives about
the encounter.

The rest of me, my paternal grandfather was Lithuanian, White Russian,
German and Cossack on his dad's side and French-Canadian, Mohawk and
Miqmaq on his mom's.

I married a nice Greek girl ,-)

Then again, when you look beyond our current ideas of nationality to
the peoples who formed the peoples who became those modern nations,
I'm mostly Germanic, Norse and Celtic.

Good talk about food by the way 8-)

Valete - Venator
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66570 From: L Julia Aquila Date: 2009-06-09
Subject: Re: Classic Poetry, Prose, Proems
Salvete Omnes,

For this hours selection In honor of Sacred Vesta I will begin by departing from the usual poetry, prose of classical literature and offer a scholarly comment this will be followed by classic prose:

"The thing and the power that dwelt in it were inseparably connected. Yet the power was not the thing, nor was the thing the power. Janus was the door and yet not the door; Vesta the hearth and yet not the hearth. Janus was the power that manifested itself in the door. Thus with Janus were associated all the things that had to do with the door both in its physical and in its metaphysical aspects. Janus was the god of all entrances and of all beginnings, and thus also of the dawn as the beginning of the day, and of the New Year as the beginning of the year. Similarly, Vesta who manifested herself in the hearth became the goddess of all the family life which centered about the hearth."

The Religious Life of Ancient Rome by Jesse Benedict Carter 1911(ISBN 0-8154-0429-9/LCCN 72-84817)

*********************************************************************

Here is the Capitol where in the old days a human head was found, and this was declared to be an omen, for in that place would be fixed the head and supreme sovereign power of the world. Here it was that whilst the Capitol was being cleared with augural rites, Juventas and Terminus, to the great delight of your fathers, would not allow themselves to be moved. Here is the Fire of Vesta; here are the Shields sent down from heaven; here are all the gods, who, if you remain, will be gracious to you.'

hic Capitolium est, ubi quondam capite humano inuento responsum est eo loco caput rerum summamque imperii fore; hic cum augurato liberaretur Capitolium, Iuuentas Terminusque maximo gaudio patrum uestrorum moueri se non passi; hic Uestae ignes, hic ancilia caelo demissa, hic omnes propitii manentibus uobis di.

Livy 5.54.7
Titus Livy. Ab urbe condita. Oxford. Oxford University Press. 1914


Valete,
Julia
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66571 From: marcushoratius Date: 2009-06-09
Subject: Re: Intercessio!
M. Moravius C. Cato s. p. d.

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Gaius Equitius Cato" <mlcinnyc@...> wrote:
>
> <snipped>
>
> The one thread binding the whole argument together is the question of the legitimacy of the candidacy; whether or not it was applied earlier is of no consequence; the tribune is applying it now, as is his right - obligation, even, if he believes that the Constitution has been undermined.

If that is the argument, then all of the other Tribuni Plebis should immediately oppose Agrippa's intercessio. The question of the candidacy was before the election and time had since run out to issue an intercessio on that issue. His intercessio would be invalid if that is all he can provide to oppose what the Custodes did in performing their duties. That is why I said earlier that since he gave the basis of his intercessio as the action of the Custodes in certifying the election results, and the Consules accepting the certified results of the Custodes, then I wish to hear a statement on his reasoning as it applies to that action and not to one that happened over a week earlier.


>
> With all due respect, since Modianus is a member of the College of Augurs, having that college contemplate his legitimacy is a little bit ... incestuous.
>

Ah, I see you have read my private email to Palladius. Well, no matter. There is no secret to how I regard that matter to have been an act of incestum and thus that the individual placed himself in sacro Iovis. As Pontifex Q. Fabius Maximus once wrote to the Collegium Pontificum, on 3 Sept. 2005: "As I pointed out, we are not ole Rome, we are surrounded by a sea of unbelievers. Where in old Rome, where a person who was "unclean" could hold a major magistracy? Nowhere." He might have asked too where in Roma antiqua did they ever allow a leno to hold a magistracy?


Your knowledge of religious law, Cato, is apparently as weak as your knowledge of Nova Roma law. Incestum is whatever pollutes. Swearing by Gods in whom you do not believe might be considered to have polluted a sacred oath, and thus some might look at it as an act of incestum. However, words alone never constitutes an obstitum, as I explained to the Collegium Pontificum some years ago when I wrote, "There are four cases from Roma antiqua where such misconduct (i. e. disrespectful words) had led to the lesser charge of incestum. Only three of these cases were ever brought to trial. In two cases, those of Vestal Virgin Postumia and that of Cotta Mesalinus, the defendants were acquitted because it was ruled that the misconduct did not constitute incestum, and also because the penalty required for an adverse decision would have been too severe for the offense committed (Livy 4.44.11; Tacitus Annales 6.5). Et incestum est quaecumque pollutio (Servius Honoratus Ad Aeneis 6.150). Only by an act, not by speech alone, may a person pollute that which is held to be sacred. It is only in the case of Valerius Soranus therefore that his speech was taken to be an act, since by speaking he revealed the secret name of the protective Goddess of Rome. With that verdict Valerius Soranus was therefore rightly executed (Crucified by Pompeius Magnus)."

"Cincius said that obstitum was whatever the Gods and Goddesses would stand against; that is, that which shall have been seen as what may be nefarious (Fest. p. 193a, 4)." Such would be the case if one brought spurcum to a sacrifice as Antistius Labeo explained on spurcum in Liber X of his Commentarii de iure pontificio. And how one would know whether the Gods stand against some thing or some act as obstitum, according to Cloatius and Aelius Stilo, is by "a violent assault sent down from the heavens."

Now, if there were anything that polluted the election, anything that the Gods and Goddesses would stand against, then taking the auspices is the correct manner to have a decision given.


> Iuppiter O.M. is certainly able to take care of Himself; have you considered that the fairly clear argument against Modianus' candidacy might be His way of telling us that He's not pleased with it?
>

A minority factio voicing their disappointment at your defeat is hardly an omen sent from Jupiter. One might consider such an assertion to be a matter of hubris on your part.

I, on the other hand, have faith in Jupiter Optimus Maximus to send auspicia when called upon in a proper manner. I was not asked to perform the auspicia in regard to holding elections in the Centuriata. If Modianus, as the only other Augur publicus, took those auspices, then I might regard that as improper. But certainly not incestum. As for myself, I have spent a good deal of my time outdoors lately, and I have not received any ill omens. Just this morning an omen was sent to me on a minor personal matter, Apollo sending me His birds in a matter regarding my health. But no signs of anything terribly disapproved of by the Gods. No sudden and violent thunder claps or bolts of lightning to warn of the disapproval of the Gods. For as Cicero wrote:

"The only sign considered to vitiate a comitia is lightning."

"Comitiorum solum vitium est fulmen." De Div. 2.18.43



> As we stand right now there is, as I said, only one censor; the veto puts us in the position of the election results never having been brought to the consuls and the consuls never having accepted them.
>

Oh? I saw that at least one Tribunus opposed the intercessio of Agrippa so far, but I have not seen what other Tribuni Plebis may or may not have said yet.


> I did *not* say - nor do I say now, nor will I *ever* say - that I win "by default". If the tribunician veto is upheld, we will be required to hold new elections. If that is the case, I will certainly not stand since although a number of centuries supported me it is more important, I think, that we turn to someone against whom there is felt no ill-will for whatever reason, justified or not.
>
> Vale,
>
> Cato
>
>

Well, if new elections will be required, perhaps through a process of elimination we will soon enough have an indisputable Censor suffectus.


Vale et vade in Deo
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66572 From: marcushoratius Date: 2009-06-09
Subject: Re: Another little brag. . .
Salve Julia

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "L Julia Aquila" <dis_pensible@...> wrote:
>
> Salve,
>
> I was wondering if anyone would catch that! Now you are a lot younger than I am and I am surprised that stereotype still persists but the line about "the beautiful children", was a positive offering for what old fasioned Italians and Irish often thought was the end of the world;)
> As to why, I dunno, ....

Then ask Joe Kennedy what Charlie Luck did when Joe tried to break into the liquor business by hijacking Lucky's trucks.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66573 From: L Julia Aquila Date: 2009-06-09
Subject: Re: Roman cookery
Salve Felix,

I had meant to thank you for this earlier but it got lost, and since we were talking about food today I search for it. I will add some more ancient recipes as time permits;)
Pasta con sarde is one of my favorites and somewhere in here I believe I can recreate the recipe from when I was growing up.
The second recipe looks great but i will add either tomato paste or maybe some Roma tomatoes and omit the breadcrumbs. I will save these and experiment sometime in the future;)

Again thank you!

Salve,
Julia




--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "wuffa2001" <magewuffa@...> wrote:
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "L Julia Aquila" <dis_pensible@> wrote:
> >
> > Salvete
> >
> > Anyone have a good recipe for Pasta Con Sarde? And yes I understand from what we know, pasta was not used in Rome however the traditional base for the sauce does have its roots in Roma. Thanks in advance.
> >
> > Valete,
> > Julia
> >
>
> Salve
> well there this one I like have it 1 to 2 times a year
>
> INGREDIENTS (Nutrition)
>
> * 1 (16 ounce) package spaghetti
> * 3/4 cup olive oil, divided
> * 6 cloves garlic, minced
> * 2 (4 ounce) cans sardines packed in olive oil, drained
> * 1 cup seasoned bread crumbs
> * 1/3 cup freshly grated Parmesan cheese
> * 1/4 cup chopped fresh parsley
> * 1 teaspoon ground black pepper
> * additional Parmesan cheese for serving (optional)
>
> DIRECTIONS
>
> 1. Bring a large pot of lightly salted water to a boil. Add the spaghetti, and cook until al dente, or 8 to 10 minutes. Drain, and rinse under cold water. Toss with 1/4 cup olive oil, cover and keep warm.
> 2. Place another 1/4 cup olive oil in a skillet, and heat over medium heat. Stir in the garlic, and cook just until golden, 2 to 3 minutes. Add the sardines, and cook 1 minute more. Stir in the bread crumbs and 1/3 cup Parmesan cheese. If necessary to give the mixture a crumbly texture, stir in the remaining 1/4 cup of olive oil. Stir in the parsley and pepper, and remove from the heat. If desired, serve with additional Parmesan cheese.
>
> ==================================================================
> and this one is good
>
> Pasta con le Sarde (Pasta with Sardine Sauce)
>
> This is a classic Sicilian dish from Palermo,created when the Saracens ruled Sicily. Sicilians would use the fennel that grows wild in the lava-rich soil which is a more intense taste than the cultivated.
>
> * 2 pounds fresh sardines
> * 1 1/2 pounds bulb fennel, thickly sliced
> * 1/2 cup olive oil
> * 2 onions, finely sliced
> * 4 anchovy filets
> * 1/2 cup pine nuts
> * 1/2 cup golden raisins
> * 1 package saffron
> * Salt and pepper to taste
> * 1 pound bucatini
> * 1 cup breadcrumbs
>
> METHOD
>
> Preheat oven to 350°F.
>
> Remove heads and tails from half the sardines. Cut in 1 inch pieces. Leave second half intact.
>
> Wash and trim fennel. Put into pan with about 8 cups cold, salted water. Bring to a boil and cook until tender, about 5- 8 minutes. Remove with slotted spoon, drain in colander, then gently squeeze out water. Chop roughly. Reserve cooking water.
>
> Heat 1/4 cup oil in frying pan. Sauté onions over medium heat until golden. Add chopped sardines and anchovies. As they cook, crush sardines with back of spoon to make a thick paste. Add pine nuts, raisins, saffron, salt and pepper.
>
> In a separate pan, heat remaining oil and lightly sauté the fennel, removing to a separate bowl. Sauté the remaining whole sardines. Cook until tender, about 10 minutes, turning once gently to not break sardines.
>
> Using fennel water, boil pasta until al dente, about 10 -= 12 minutes. Drain. Put in bowl and dress with half the sardine sauce.
>
> Put a layer of dressed pasta in an ovenproof casserole. On top of that, put a layer of fennel, then a a layer of whole sardines with additional sauce. Continue until ingredients are used up, ending with a layer of bucatini. Cover with breadcrumbs. Sprinkle breadcrumbs over top. Cover and bake in preheated 350°F oven 15 - 20 minutes.
>
> Pasta may be served hot or cold.
>
> Serves: 6
>
> it is very good Cold
> ====================================================================
> and
>
> olive oil
> 1 fennel bulb, trimmed and thinly sliced, fronds reserved for garnish
> 3 fat cloves garlic, thinly sliced
> 3-4 anchovy filets
> 1 28-ounce can whole tomatoes in tomato puree
> 4-5 basil leaves
> dry white wine
> juice of 1 lemon
> red pepper flakes to taste
> 1/3 cup golden raisins
> 1 tin sardines in olive oil
> Italian flat-leaf parsley, for garnish
> 1/2 pound spaghetti or linguine
>
> Heat olive oil in large skillet over medium heat. Add sliced fennel and cook, stirring, until fennel begins to soften. Add garlic slices and cook until fragrant and garlic begins to soften. Add anchovy filets to skillet and crush them into a paste with the back of a spoon, then stir into the fennel and garlic.
>
> Add tomatoes, crushing with the back of the spoon until they're broken up. Throw in the basil leaves, a glug of white wine and and the lemon juice, red pepper flakes, and golden raisins. Stir well, then add sardine filets to the pan and spoon a little sauce over them. Lower heat and simmer for about 30 minutes.
>
> At this point, set a large pot of water over high heat. When water comes to a boil add salt (I used about 1 1/2 tablespoons) and stir in the pasta. Cook until al dente.
>
> When pasta is ready, break up sardines with the spoon and stir them into the sauce. Add pasta to the sauce along with about 1/2 cup of the pasta cooking water, stir, and simmer until pasta has cooked through.
>
> To serve, top with toasted bread crumbs (or a big grating of hard cheese, if you're so inclined), and garnish with fennel fronds or parsley.
>
>
>
>
> Vale
>
> MCF take care
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66574 From: L Julia Aquila Date: 2009-06-09
Subject: Re: Another little brag. . .
Salve Pontiff Piscinus,

Oh... I think that would be traversing into very dark territory. Of course I think you know i will look this up. I do know Joe Kennedy was not a saint, I know nothing about Charlie Luck.(I was a bit sheltered as a child)
Thank you;)

Vale,
Julia

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "marcushoratius" <MHoratius@...> wrote:
>
> Salve Julia
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "L Julia Aquila" <dis_pensible@> wrote:
> >
> > Salve,
> >
> > I was wondering if anyone would catch that! Now you are a lot younger than I am and I am surprised that stereotype still persists but the line about "the beautiful children", was a positive offering for what old fasioned Italians and Irish often thought was the end of the world;)
> > As to why, I dunno, ....
>
> Then ask Joe Kennedy what Charlie Luck did when Joe tried to break into the liquor business by hijacking Lucky's trucks.
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66575 From: L Julia Aquila Date: 2009-06-09
Subject: Re: Another little brag. . .
Salve Pontifex Piscinus,

Ah Luciano, yes i know who he is and now i am enlightened somewhat and know whereabouts this comes from. Not the Joe Kennedy I know of either. Wow.

Vale,
Julia

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "L Julia Aquila" <dis_pensible@...> wrote:
>
> Salve Pontiff Piscinus,
>
> Oh... I think that would be traversing into very dark territory. Of course I think you know i will look this up. I do know Joe Kennedy was not a saint, I know nothing about Charlie Luck.(I was a bit sheltered as a child)
> Thank you;)
>
> Vale,
> Julia
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "marcushoratius" <MHoratius@> wrote:
> >
> > Salve Julia
> >
> > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "L Julia Aquila" <dis_pensible@> wrote:
> > >
> > > Salve,
> > >
> > > I was wondering if anyone would catch that! Now you are a lot younger than I am and I am surprised that stereotype still persists but the line about "the beautiful children", was a positive offering for what old fasioned Italians and Irish often thought was the end of the world;)
> > > As to why, I dunno, ....
> >
> > Then ask Joe Kennedy what Charlie Luck did when Joe tried to break into the liquor business by hijacking Lucky's trucks.
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66576 From: Publius Ullerius Stephanus Venator Date: 2009-06-09
Subject: Charlie Lucky, was Re: Another little brag. . .
Avete;

Salvatore Lucania (Born November, 1897 in Lercara Friddi, Sicily)
alias Charles "Charlie Lucky" Luciano was the boss of the Genovese
Family of the Sicilian-style organized crime in New York and other
environs. He is credited with bringing the "Five Families" together
in the "Commission," which group divvied up territories and rackets
amongst themselves to try and stem the wars amongst them.

Charlie Lucky is looked upon as one of the architects of modern
organized crime, especially the early expansion and control of the
heroin trade after WW II.

The "Wise guys" who met in the back room of Papa D'Orazio's shoe shop
were not even close to this level, just some book making and loan
sharking ,-)

Ah, those were the days. . .

Venathustra
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66577 From: Publius Ullerius Stephanus Venator Date: 2009-06-09
Subject: Re: Another little brag. . .
. . .as for the [expletive deleted] Kennedy clan of High-anus and
Bah-stun. . .(my apologies to the fine folk from these places who are
not this sort of Kennedy).

The Kennedy family trust still receives money on every bottle of
liquor imported into the US from the British Isles. Old Joe, got this
set up when he was ambassador to Britain, before he was recalled for
his pro-German sympathies.

John F Kennedy was the only one worth a damn in my family's
estimation, and was the last Democrat for whom my dad (a life long
union man) voted for in US presidential elections, except for George
Wallace. My dad could be termed a "blue-dog" Democrat.

Fat Teddy, he's a 4th stringer and never should have been.

Venii - a proud son of Danial Shays country.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66578 From: violetphearsen@yahoo.com Date: 2009-06-09
Subject: Happy Vestalia to all!
Happy Vestalia to all, especially the women and girls of Nova Roma!!
 
Our morning ritual went very well despite the fact that we had to move everything indoors on account of the weather and the threat of thunderstorms. Prayers and offerings of Mola Salsa were made on behalf of all Nova Romans, both living and deceased, and their families and pets. We will start the evening ritual around six, to be followed by a feast for all the women present. We have had women visiting with us throughout the day and expect more this evening.
On a side note, the Argei Micine arrived about an hour ago and are running run riot all over the place. They have found of particular interest our curtains, which they keep trying to climb. Also, my floor length dress seems to them like a good place to pop under to hide. I have to watch my step. I will make sure that every kitten is held by someone when the ritual start. Don't want to find a kitten underfoot in the middle of the ritual!
 
To celebrate Vestalia, I share with you the words of Ovid.
 
Valete bene in pace Deorum,
 
Maxima Valeria Messallina
Sacerdos Vestalis
 
"Nihil apud Romanos Templo Vestae sanctius habetur."
"Among the Romans nothing is held more holy than the Temple of Vesta."
 
*******************
 
9 June
 
Vesta, be favorable. To you I now open my lips in devotions,
if I am permitted to come to your ritual.
While absorbed in prayer I felt a divine presence
and the floor shone joyously with purple light.
Of course I didn't see you - so long, poetic license
you are not a Goddess for a man to behold,
but I've learned with no human teacher what I didn't know
while confusion had me in its grip.
When Rome had passed forty anniversaries, people say
that a shrine welcomed the Goddess who keeps the flame,
the project of that peace-loving king, the most God-fearing soul
ever produced by the Sabine territory.
The roofs of bronze you see today were then straw-thatched,
and the walls were plaited from pliant wattles.
This tiny spot, the site of the Vestals' official residence,
was then the palace of King Numa the long-beard.
But the shape of the temple, which survivies to this day, was there before,
they say, and a commendable reason is behind that shape.
Vesta and the Earth are the same; behind both is an unsleeping fire.
The Earth is like a ball, completely unsupported,
its heavy weight hanging in the air beneath it.
Rotation itself balances the sphere and holds it up:
there are no corners to weigh down any side.
Situated as it is in the central region of the universe,
so it doesn't touch any side more than another,
if it were not curved, it would be one side's closer neighbor,
and the universe wouldn't have Earth as its weighty center.
There's a globe suspended in space by Archimedes' know-how,
a tiny model of the measureless heavens,
where the Earth is equidistant from its top and its bottom.
The spherical shape makes such a thing possible.
Vesta's temple looks the same. Not a single corner
sticks out, and the dome protects it from the rain.
Why do virgin attendants minister to the Goddess, you ask?
For this too I'll find the proper explanation.
Juno and Ceres, they say, were sired on Rhea
by Saturn; Vesta was the third daughter.
The first two wed, we hear that the first two gave birth.
Of the three, only one remained inexperienced with men.
No wonder that a virgin is delighted by a virgin attendant
and welcomes chaste hands to her rites.
Don't imagine that Vesta is anything but living flame;
you won't see a single substance born from flame.
And so She's rightly a virgin, She produces nor receives
any seeds, and She loves Her virgin associates.
For quite a while I stupidly thought there were statues of Vesta.
I soon learned there weren't any in the domed rotunda.
A fire that never goes out is hidden in that temple;
neither Vesta nor the fire has a single likeness.
The earth is very stable. From being very stable, Vesta gets Her name,
as in Greek She's Hestia from Her heavy resting.
The hearth is named for its hearty warmth that heartens all,
but it used to be at the front of the house.
From this I believe the "vestibule" derives, and praying
with a preamble to Vesta, who occupies first place.
 
It once was the custom to sit before the hearth on benches
and believe one's Gods were present at the table.
Even today when the rites of ancient Vacuna take place,
one stands and sits before Vacuna's hearth.
A bit of archaic custom has come down to the present age:
a clean little dish brings the food offered to Vesta.
Look at the bread hanging down from garlanded asses,
and wreaths of flowers festooning rough millstones.
The early peasants used ovens only for toasting barley
(the goddess of ovens has rites of her own):
the hearth itself got the bread ready, buried in the ashes,
with a broken roof-tile laid on the warm ground.
And so the baker honors the hearth and our Lady of Hearths
and the ass that turns the volcanic millstones.
Ruddy Priapus, should I bypass your disgrace, or recount it?
It's a little story with a lot of laughs.
With Her turreted crown in place on Her forehead, Cybele
invited the immortal Gods to Her feast.
She invited both the satyrs and those rural spirits, the nymphs;
Silenus was there without an invitation.
It's prohibited and would be protracted to describe divine banquets:
they stayed up all night with lots of wine.
Some were roaming aimlessly in the hollows of shady Ida,
others lay down and relaxed on the soft grass;
some made merry, some were asleep; others linked arms
and stamped a quick three-step on the verdant ground.
Vesta lay down and took a peaceful nap without a care,
just as She was, with Her head pillowed on the turf.
But the ruddy garden scarecrow went prowling for nymphs and goddesses,
directing his roaming steps back and forth.
He glimpsed Vesta: maybe he thought She was a nymph or maybe
he knew She was Vesta, but he says he didn't.
He got a nasty notion, and tried to approach stealthily,
making his way on tiptoe with pounding heart.
Old man Silenus had happened to leave the ass he had ridden
by the banks of a gently babbling stream.
The God of the long Hellespont was making a move to get started
when that creature brayed an untimely blast.
The deep sound frightened the Goddess awake. The whole crowd flocked
together, the villain escaped amidst threatening hands.
At Lampsacus it's the custom to slaughter this beast for Priapus, singing,
"We fittingly offer a tattler's guts to the flames."
But Vesta, You gratefully deck it with necklaces of bread.
Work stops, and the idle mills fall silent.
Now I'll tell the meaning of the altar on the Thunderer's stronghold
for Iupiter the Baker, more notable for its name than its cost.
The Capitoline was hemmed in and hard-pressed by savage Gauls:
a siege of long standing had caused starvation.
Iupiter summoned the celestials to His royal throne and said
"Commence" to Mars, who reported at once:
"Of course the state of their distress is unknown to you
and this heartache of mine needs to voice a complaint.
But if you demand a concise account of their shameful distress,
the Alpine foe has brought Rome to her knees.
This is the city you would put in command of the earth?
Just now she crushed the nearby towns and Etruscan forces;
hope was full speed. Now she's been driven from her home.
I have witnessed old men in their bronze-fitted courtyards meet death
decked in the regalia of their past triumphs.
I have witnessed the talismans of Trojan Vesta moved from Her dwelling
to safety. Romans of course suppose Gods are somebodies.
But if they looked around at the stronghold where you reside
and all your homes hard-pressed by the siege,
they would know that no help is left to repay concern for the Gods
and that incense offered with a careful hand is a waste.
If only a chance to fight would appear. Let them take up arms
and if they can't prevail, let them fall.
But now, without food and afraid of inglorious death, cooped up
on their hill they're hard-pressed by the barbarian horde."
Then Venus, and Quirinus splendid with augur's crook and kingly robe,
and Vesta too said much for their Latium's sake.
Iupiter replied, "Those walls concern every one of us,
and vanquished Gaul will pay the price.
Now Vesta, see that the enemy thinks the grain that's gone
is still left, and don't abandon your dwelling.
Whatever grain is intact, let the hollow machinery grind
and the hearth fire-harden what kneading has softened."
By the time Saturn's virgin daughter had given Her assent
to Her brother's command, the hour was midnight.
Toil had brought sleep to the Roman leaders. Thundering at them,
Iupiter revealed His will through holy lips:
"Get up and from the stronghold's heights into the enemy's midst
let loose the resource you are least willing to lose."
Sleep departed and the strange riddle drove them to seek
to surrender the resource as ordered against their will.
It appeared to be bread, so they threw down the bounty of Ceres.
What they threw clanged on helmets and long shields.
There went the hope of starving them out. When the enemy had been routed,
a splendid altar was out up for Iupiter the Baker.
 
I happened to be heading home on Vesta's holiday by the staircase
that has recently linked New Street to the Roman Forum.
I observed a lady climbing down this way barefooted.
Unable to speak, I stopped in my tracks.
An old woman from the neighborhood noticed, told me to sit down,
and said as her head shook and her voice trembled:
"This area where the fora are today was occupied by sodden swamps;
the storm sewer was soggy with the river's overflow.
Lake Curtius over there, the site of altars high and dry,
now solid ground, was a lake before.
The regular route for the parade to the Circus through the Velabrum
district was nothing but willows and hollow reeds.
Often a reveller heading home by the city's waterway
would sing and make drunken remarks to the boatmen.
Yonder God, Vertumnus, hadn't yet taken a name from averting
the stream, that also fits His versatile shapes.
Here too there was a grove thick with canes and rushes,
and a swamp you wouldn't approach with your shoes still on.
The pools have receded and the banks keep their waters in,
and now it's dry ground, but that custom survives."
That explained that. "Goodbye, my dear old woman," I said.
"May what's left of your life be entirely easy."
 
The rest of the story I learned long ago in the time of my boyhood,
but I mustn't omit it on that account.
Ilus, great-grandson of Dardanus, had just constructed new walls
(Ilus the rich still controlled the East).
People believe a heaven-sent statue of Minerva in arms
landed on the slopes of the city of Ilium.
I was anxious to see it: I saw the temple and its environs;
that's still over there, but Rome has the Palladium.
When the Trojans consulted Apollo, from His shady grove darkly
He gave this response with lips that do not lie:
"Keep safe the Goddess from heaven, and you'll keep your city safe.
Authority over this area goes where She does."
Ilus kept Her safe by shutting Her away atop his stronghold,
and this concern passed on to his heir Laomedon.
In Priam's reign She was not kept safe enough, as was Her will
after Her beauty lost out in that contest.
They say She was stolen. Maybe Adrastus' grandson did it,
or Ulysses, the proficient trickster, or Aeneas.
The culprit is uncertain, the object is at Rome, safeguarded by Vesta
because She sees everything by Her constant light.
 
Oh how frightened the senators were, when Vesta's temple caught
fire, and She almost was buried by her very own roof!
It was a blaze of hallowed fires and fires accursed,
a blend of flames profane and sacred.
The dumbstruck Vestals undid their hair and wept:
fright itself had taken their strength.
Into their midst flew Metellus, who said at the top of his voice,
"Come help; weeping won't do any good.
Pick up the talismans of destiny in your virgin fingers.
Not your prayers but your hands must carry them off.
Woe is me! Why hesitate?" He saw them hesitate
and go down in terror on bended knee.
He scooped up holy water, raised his hands, and said, "Forgive me,
as a man I shall enter where a man must not go.
Let Rome be absolved by the loss of my life."
He spoke and burst in: the Goddess he carried off approved his deed,
and was kept safe by Her chief priest's service.
Now, holy flames, in Augustus' reign you shine as you should:
the fire on the hearth from Troy is here to stay.
There won't be any record in this leader's reign of a priestess
sullying her vows, nor buried alive in the ground.
That's how an unchaste one dies, buried in what she's profaned:
the Earth and Vesta are the same divinity. 
 
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
 
From Ovid's "Fasti - Roman Holidays," translated by Betty Rose Nagle, 1995 ed.

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66579 From: L Julia Aquila Date: 2009-06-09
Subject: Re: Classic Poetry, Prose, Proems
Salvete Omnes,

This hour's offering:

Propertuis Book IV.1:1-70 Rome and its history


Here, whatever you see, stranger, which is now mighty Rome, before Trojan Aeneas was hills and grass: and Evander's fugitive herd lay where the Palatine stands, sacred to Apollo of Ships. These golden temples sprang from earthly gods: there was no disgrace in houses made without art: Tarpeian Jupiter thundered from a bare cliff, and Tiber was foreign to our cattle.

Where Remus' house raises itself from that stairway, a single hearth was a whole kingdom to the brothers. The Curia that shines up there, adorned with the purple hem of the Senate, held the Fathers, clothed in animal skins to its rustic heart. A shepherd's horn called the citizens to speak in ancient times: often the Senate was a hundred of them in a field.

No billowing awnings hung over the theatre's space: no scent on stage of its customary saffron. No man cared to seek out alien gods: while the awed people trembled at their father's rites. But, they celebrated the Parilia, annually, with bonfires of straw, and such purification as we repeat now with the docked horse's blood.

Vesta, poor, delighted in garlanded donkeys, and skinny cattle dragged along cheap emblems. At the Compitalia the narrow crossroads were purified with the blood of fatted pigs, and the shepherd offered sheep's guts to the sound of reed pipes. The ploughman, dressed in skins, flourished his hairy scourge, from which lawless Fabius Lupercus took the Lupercalia's sacred rite.

Their raw soldiers did not gleam with threatening armour: they joined in battle naked, with fire-hardened pikes. Lycmon, the countryman, pitched the first general's tent, and the greater part of Tatius's wealth was in sheep. Such were the Titienses, heroic Ramnes, and the Luceres of Solonium, such Romulus who drove four white triumphal horses.

Indeed, Bovillae was hardly a suburb of the tiny city, and Gabii greatly crowded, that now is nothing. And Alba stood, powerful, founded through the omen of a white sow, when it was far from there to Fidenae. The Roman child has nothing of his fathers save the name, nor reflects that a she-wolf was his race's foster-mother.

Here, Troy, for the best, you sent your exiled household gods. Here, at such auguries, the Trojan vessel sailed! Even then the omens were good, since the open womb of the Wooden Horse did not fatally wound her, when the trembling father clung to his son's back, and the flames were afraid to scorch those pious shoulders.

Then came the spirited Decii, and the consulship of Brutus, and Venus herself carried Caesar's arms here, bore the victorious arms of a resurgent Troy. Iulus, a fortunate country received your gods, since the tripod of Avernus's quivering Sybil told Remus on the Aventine to purify the fields. And Cassandra, the prophetess of Troy's ravings proved truthful in time, concerning ancient Priam: `Wheel your horses, Greeks! You win in vain! Troy's earth will live, and Jupiter grant arms to her ashes!'

Wolf of Mars, the best of nurses to our State, what towers have sprung from your milk! Now to try and portray those towers in patriotic verse, ah me, how puny the sound that rises from my mouth! But however thin the streams that flow from my chest, it is all in the service of my country. Let Ennius crown his verse with a shaggy garland: Bacchus, hold out to me leaves of your ivy, so that my books might make Umbria swell with pride, Umbria fatherland of the Roman Callimachus! Whoever sees the towers of Assisi climbing from the valley, honour those walls according to my genius! Rome favour me, the work soars up for you: citizens grant me good omens, and let a bird on the right sing at my inception! I will cry: `Fall Troy, and Trojan Rome arise!' and I'll sing lengthy perils on sea and land. I will sing rites and days, and the ancient names of places: my horses need to strain towards that goal.


I

"hoc, quodcumque uides, hospes, qua maxima Roma est,
ante Phrygem Aenean collis et herba fuit;
atque ubi Nauali stant sacra Palatia Phoebo,
Euandri profugae concubuere boues.
fictilibus creuere deis haec aurea templa,
nec fuit opprobrio facta sine arte casa;
Tarpeiusque pater nuda de rupe tonabat,
et Tiberis nostris aduena bubus erat.
qua gradibus domus ista Remi se sustulit, olim
unus erat fratrum maxima regna focus.
curia, praetexto quae nunc nitet alta senatu,
pellitos habuit, rustica corda, Patres.
bucina cogebat priscos ad uerba Quiritis:
centum illi in prato saepe senatus erat.
nec sinuosa cauo pendebant uela theatro,
pulpita sollemnis non oluere crocos.
nulli cura fuit externos quaerere diuos,
cum tremeret patrio pendula turba sacro,
annuaque accenso celebrante Parilia faeno,
qualia nunc curto lustra nouantur equo.
Vesta coronatis pauper gaudebat asellis,
ducebant macrae uilia sacra boues.
parua saginati lustrabant compita porci,
pastor et ad calamos exta litabat ouis.
uerbera pellitus saetosa mouebat arator,
unde licens Fabius sacra Lupercus habet.
nec rudis infestis miles radiabat in armis:
miscebant usta proelia nuda sude.
prima galeritus posuit praetoria Lycmon,
magnaque pars Tatio rerum erat inter ouis.
hinc Tities Ramnesque uiri Luceresque Soloni,
quattuor hinc albos Romulus egit equos.
quippe suburbanae parua minus urbe Bouillae
et, qui nunc nulli, maxima turba Gabi.
et stetit Alba potens, albae suis omine nata,
ac tibi Fidenas longa erat isse uia.
nil patrium nisi nomen habet Romanus alumnus:
sanguinis altricem non pudet esse lupam.
huc melius profugos misisti, Troia, Penatis;
heu quali uecta est Dardana puppis aue!
iam bene spondebant tunc omina, quod nihil illam
laeserat abiegni uenter apertus equi,
cum pater in nati trepidus ceruice pependit,
et uerita est umeros urere flamma pios.
tunc animi uenere Deci Brutique secures,
uexit et ipsa sui Caesaris arma Venus,
arma resurgentis portans uictricia Troiae:
felix terra tuos cepit, Iule, deos,
si modo Auernalis tremulae cortina Sibyllae
dixit Auentino rura pianda Remo,
aut si Pergameae sero rata carmina uatis
longaeuum ad Priami uera fuere caput:
"uertite equum, Danai! male uincitis! Ilia tellus
uiuet, et huic cineri Iuppiter arma dabit."
optima nutricum nostris lupa Martia rebus,
qualia creuerunt moenia lacte tuo!
moenia namque pio coner disponere uersu:
ei mihi, quod nostro est paruus in ore sonus!
sed tamen exiguo quodcumque e pectore riui
fluxerit, hoc patriae seruiet omne meae.
Ennius hirsuta cingat sua dicta corona:
mi folia ex hedera porrige, Bacche, tua,
ut nostris tumefacta superbiat Vmbria libris,
Vmbria Romani patria Callimachi!
scandentis quisquis cernit de uallibus arces,
ingenio muros aestimet ille meo!
Roma, faue, tibi surgit opus, date candida ciues
omina, et inceptis dextera cantet auis!
sacra diesque canam et cognomina prisca locorum:
has meus ad metas sudet oportet equus."

Valete,
Julia
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66580 From: Timothy or Stephen Gallagher Date: 2009-06-09
Subject: Ellis Island (OT)
Salve Paulla,
 
Genealogy is such a great avocation.
 
Ellis Island was not in operation until 1890. I would bet most Americans have relatives
that came well before this date. The problem I have is finding out where they left the old country from.
 
While finding is great the looking is even better.
 
Vale
 
Paulinus
 

 



To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
From: dis_pensible@...
Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2009 21:16:17 +0000
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Another little brag. . .




Salve Paulla,

For those tracing their families, not coming through Ellis island poses a huge problem. Very interesting, did you have any problems getting their records?

Hey I like bell peppers and eat them raw, sliced, but just as they are;)
I like fried eggplant, another "holiday food" along with Garduna which is fried Burdock, of course I cannot find it here but i do have the recipe and I think it is similar in flavor to fried fennel except it looks like celery:
Garduna
Baby Burdock [before it develops stickers, looks like small celery stocks]
Parboil and cut into 5' pieces
Dip in flour, egg and seasoned breadcrumbs
Fry in Olive Oil until brown then place on kitchen towels to drain excess oil off, serve hot.

I tried to make fried eggplant but it...disintegrated; ) But I have made a good Mousakka! Of course that is Greek and maybe the Ouzo made it better;)

I like mild Italian sausage, with onions and peppers! But I rarely eat it anymore.

How about Escarole soup?

Vale,
Julia

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com, "aerdensrw" <aerdensrw@. ..> wrote:
>
> You guys are making me so hungry!
>
> My father's parents' families came from Bisacquino, Sicily. Interestingly, they arrived in America through the port at Galveston instead of through Ellis Island.
>
> I've never heard of putting boiled egg in lasagna. That's different. We make it pretty much the same way as Julia's family makes it, except my Mom puts bell peppers in it (blech!).
>
> Bracciole is a new dish, to me. I grew up eating fenocchi, which is fried fennel, along with fried/breaded cauliflower and fried eggplant. I'm not fond of Italian sausage because of the caraway or fennel seeds. My Dad also makes homemade canoli, but he makes a cream filling instead of using ricotta cheese.
>
> Paulla Corva
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com, "L Julia Aquila" <dis_pensible@ > wrote:
> >
> > Salve!
> >
> > I am having a bit of a problem posting, keep getting errors, so I will try this again.
> > Nonononono, I cannot abide hard boiled eggs in Lasagna*laugh* however I will concede to using eggs in the preparation of the ricotta for the Lasagna. My famiglia makes a very plain Lasagna: Lasagna noodles, Ricotta, Pecorino Roman, lots of Mozzarella, Tomato Meat sauce, garlic, oregano, basil and pepper. Although I have blasphemed and added mushrooms. Our usual cuisine did not include a lot of pasta but well seasoned meats and fresh vegetables that were mostly roasted, broiled or baked.
> > My Grandfather' s settled in NYC when they were very young in the late 1800's then later married and raised their families on Long Island, Nassau County although we do have relatives in Suffolk. We also have relatives out West also. I am, alas, a native New Yorker, one of the many Italoamericani.
> > Even though many immigrants were from Naples and Sicily, Liguria and Veneto followed in the statistics. Many reasons for immigration including political. I am not so sure why Naples tops Sicily except perhaps this was due to the fact that Naples was the port of departure for many immigrants in other parts of Italy. Others left Italy from France. Not all came through Ellis Island either as was the case with some of my ancestors.
> > It always so nice to speak with people of similar heritage, we come from such a rich history and culture.
> >
> > Vale,
> > Julia
>


Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66581 From: M•IVL• SEVERVS Date: 2009-06-09
Subject: Re: Happy Vestalia to all!
Salve Maxima Valeria Messallina, Sacerdos Vestalis,
 
Happy Vestalia to you, Virgo Maxima, example of Romanitas, jewel of the Res publica!
I honor you in our main forum, and it is a great honor for me to be a citizen of Nova Roma, where such women like you are to be found.
 
Optime vale,

M•IVL•SEVERVS
CONSVL•NOVÆ•ROMÆ

SENATOR
CONSVL•PROVINCIÆ•MEXICI
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66582 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2009-06-09
Subject: Re: Intercessio!
Cato Moravio Piscino sal.

Salve.

You are being - and this is a kind way to put it - disingenuous. Would we be having this discussion if, for example, Venator had run and won? No. In your own words, there is a dispute, and the dispute is based on the law. Vipsanius Agrippa believes, as do others, that the letter and the spirit of the Constitution and law of Nova Roma is being violated; a tribune may pronounce intercessio against any act of any magistrate that he or she believes is doing so.

You continue to focus on the contio part of the process and I will continue to point out that you are making a grave error in doing so, because I have specifically and directly explained why this is *not* the part of the process that concerns us now. Note that I - unlike you - do not make comments about your intelligence or knowledge, which is why it is becoming obvious that you are more interested in making very large posts showing the depth of your ability to quote sources than looking at what I have said.

What the ancients may or may not have one means little or nothing to many of the people involved in this, as has been only too well demonstrated, so trying to pretend that those involved are holding themselves to some kind of standard set by the ancients is amusing, to say the least.

And since no other tribune has issued a proper dissension, the veto stands.

"Realizing, then, that these phenomena are due to natural causes, and happen without regularity and at no certain time, shall we look to them for signs of future events? It is passing strange, if Jupiter warns us by means of thunderbolts, that he sends so many to no purpose! What, for example, is his object in hurling them into the middle of the sea? or, as he so often does, on to the tops of lofty mountains? Why, pray, does he waste them in solitary deserts? And why does he fling them on the shores of peoples who do not take any notice of them?" - Cicero, On Divination 2.19.44-45

Vale,

Cato
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66583 From: Maior Date: 2009-06-09
Subject: Re: Intercessio!
Maior Cato sd;
it is now obvious that by your own words and deeds you care nothing for the mos of Rome or for our gods and those words you quote look below. Piety, fides, authority in our most ancient traditions are found in the example of those great Romans we seek to emulate. -

--Primus locus sumitur ab auctoritate cure commemoramus quantae curae res ea fuit iis quorum auctoritas gravissima debeat esse: diis immortalibus qui locus sumetur ex sortibus, ex oraculis, vatibus, ostentis, prodigiis, responsis, similibus rebus.
Cicero De Inventione

You and your friends, belong anywhere and nowhere having no faith, no values, no honour.
Ave Vesta Mater! Be propitious to Nova Roma
and may those who seek to destroy the state
be defeated and forgotten
Marca Hortensia Maior


> Cato Moravio Piscino sal.
>
> What the ancients may or may not have one means little or nothing to many of the people involved in this, stands.
>
> "Realizing, then, that these phenomena are due to natural causes, and happen without regularity and at no certain time, shall we look to them for signs of future events? It is passing strange, if Jupiter warns us by means of thunderbolts, that he sends so many to no purpose! What, for example, is his object in hurling them into the middle of the sea? or, as he so often does, on to the tops of lofty mountains? Why, pray, does he waste them in solitary deserts? And why does he fling them on the shores of peoples who do not take any notice of them?" - Cicero, On Divination 2.19.44-45
>
> Vale,
>
> Cato
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66584 From: L Julia Aquila Date: 2009-06-10
Subject: Re: Classic Poetry, Prose, Proems
Salvete,

Ode To Sleep
Publius Papinius Statius (c.A.D. 45–c.A.D. 96)

Gentle divinity, how have I merited?
Whither, unfortunate wretch, have I strayed,
Thus of thy bounty to lie disenherited -
I alone whilst every other is paid?
Sleeping are cattle and birds without number,
Beasts of the wilderness rest in their lair;
Even the hills, as if weary, feign slumber,
Even the torment sighs soft in the air.

Lulled are the shuttering waves of the ocean,
Seas in the lap of the land lie at peace.
Only for me in monotonous motion
Day follows day, and there comes no release.

Moonlight & starlight & light of the morning
Seven times flit o'er my feverish cheek.
Once again Dawn's chilly hand offers warning.
Whither, oh whither for rest shall I seek?

Had I the eyes of an Argus, nor heeded
Ever to keep my whole body awake -
Half of the sentries alone being needed -
Still I could never my slumber-thirst slake.

Yet - if there's one in the arms of a lover
Scornful of sleep and the joy that sleep brings,
Come thou to me! I'll not ask thee to cover
My eyes with the fullest extant of thy wings

Happier suitors may sue for such blessing,
I'll beg a touch, be it ever so slight,
Of thy wand, or a whisk of thy garment caressing
My eyelids to droop as it crosses the night.




CRIMINE quo merui, iuuenis, placidissime diuum,
quoue errore miser, donis ut solus egerem,
Somne, tuis? tacet omne pecus uolucresque feraeque
et simulant fessos curuata cacumina somnos,
nec trucibus fluuiis idem sonus; occidit horror
aequoris, et terris maria acclinata quiescunt.
septima iam rediens Phoebe mihi respicit aegras
stare genas; totidem Oetaeae Paphiaeque reuisunt
lampades et totiens nostros Tithonia questus
praeterit et gelido parcit miserata flagello.
unde ego sufficiam? non si mihi lumina mille
quae uafer alterna tantum statione tenebat
Argus et haud umquam uigilabat corpore toto.
at nunc heu! si aliquis longa sub nocte puellae
bracchia nexa tenens ultro te, Somne, repellit,
inde ueni. nec te totas infundere pennas
luminibus compello meis (hoc turba precetur
laetior): extremo me tange cacumine uirgae
(sufficit) aut leuiter suspenso poplite transi.

Valete,
Julia
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66585 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2009-06-10
Subject: Re: Intercessio!
Cato Maior sal.

Salve.

Oh, please. Piscinus quoted Cicero on lightning; so did I.

We can quote Roman authors back and forth on just about anything until we both pass out. So please don't try to pull this "you're against the religio" business again.

If the Gods are displeased with me They can certainly take care of Themselves. They don't need you hooting about protecting Them. The same goes for Piscinus, who for all the "it is redundant to say" business keeps hinting that I have blasphemed the Gods by publicly swearing an oath by Them even though my private cultus differs from the State cult.

I would like him to say the same thing to *every single magistrate in the Respublica* who has ever taken the oath of office.

Vale,

Cato
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66586 From: Maior Date: 2009-06-10
Subject: Re: Intercessio!
M. Hortensia Quiritibus spd;

"Let men approach the gods with purity---let men appear before them in the spirit of devotion---let men remove riches from their temples; whoever does otherwise shall suffer the vengeance of heaven---let no one have private gods---neither new gods nor strange gods, unless publicly acknowledged, are to be worshiped privately---let the temples which our fathers have constructed in the cities, be upheld---let the people maintain the groves in the country, and the abodes of the Lares---let men preserve the customs of their fathers and of their family---let the gods who have been accounted celestial be worshiped, and those likewise who have merited celestial honors by their illustrious actions, such as Hercules, Bacchus, Aesculapius, Castor, Pollux, and Quirinus. Let due honor be likewise paid to those virtues, by which man is exalted to heaven---as Intelligence, Valor, Piety, Fidelity; and let temples be consecrated to their honor-

Let the public Augurs, who are the interpreters of the all-good and all-great Jupiter, likewise examine the presages and the auspices, according to the discipline of their art. Let the priests who are conversant in auguries implore prosperity for the vineyards and gardens, and pray for the general welfare of the people. Let those who give counsel in military or civic affairs attend to the auspices, and be guided by them. Let them guard against the anger of heaven, and appease it; and observe from what part of heaven the lightnings burst forth. Let them declare what lands, cities, and temples, are to be held free and consecrated. Whatever things the augur declares to be unjust, ill-omened, vicious, and accursed, let them be forsaken as prohibited and disastrous, and whoever will not obey these divine indications, let him suffer capital punishment."
Cicero, De Legibus, On the Laws, 8

"But what shall I say with respect to religion and the auspices; the affront and injury offered to which reflect immediately on the immortal gods. That this city was founded under auspices; that all business, civil, and military,foreign and domestic, is conducted under them " Livy History of Rome 6, 15

"And when the people approved, he [Romulus] appointed a day on which he proposed to consult the auspices concerning the sovereignty; and when the time was come, he rose at break of day and went forth from his tent. Then, taking his stand under the open sky in a clear space and first offering the customary sacrifice, he prayed to King Jupiter and to the other gods whom he had chosen for the patrons of the colony, that, if it was their pleasure he should be king of the city, some favourable signs might appear in the sky."

Dionysius of Halicarnassus, Roman Antiquities,

" One of the greatest advantages of the Roman constitution stems from its conception of divinity. The strength of Roman domination comes from a thing considered a flaw among other men, and by that I mean the reverential fear of the gods."
Polybius Histories 6.56

may the gods be propitious to us!
M. Hortensia Maior

>Cato Maior sal.
>
> Salve.
>
> Oh, please. Piscinus quoted Cicero on lightning; so did I.
>
> We can quote Roman authors back and forth on just about anything until we both pass out. So please don't try to pull this "you're against the religio" business again.
>
> If the Gods are displeased with me They can certainly take care of Themselves. They don't need you hooting about protecting Them. The same goes for Piscinus, who for all the "it is redundant to say" business keeps hinting that I have blasphemed the Gods by publicly swearing an oath by Them even though my private cultus differs from the State cult.
>
> I would like him to say the same thing to *every single magistrate in the Respublica* who has ever taken the oath of office.
>
> Vale,
>
> Cato
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66587 From: marcushoratius Date: 2009-06-10
Subject: a. d. IV Eidus Iuniae: VESTALIA
M. Moravius Piscinus cultoribus Deorum et omnibus salutem plurimam dicit: Optime vos omnes

Hodie est ante diem IV Eidus Iuniae; haec dies nefastus est: Vestalia

AUC 523 / 230 BCE: Vestal Virgin Tuccia

"Through the same sort of aid, the chastity of the Vestal Virgin Tuccia, charged with impurity, emerged from an obscuring cloud of ill fame. In the certain knowledge of her innocence shae dared to seek hope of salvation with an argument of doubtful issue. Seixing hold of a sieve, 'Vesta', she prayed, 'if I have always brought pure hands to your sacred service, make it so that with this Idraw water from the Tiber and bring it to Your temple.' To the prayer of the priestess thrown out boldly and rashly the Nature of Things gave way." ~ Valerius Maximus 8.1.5 absolved


AUC 791 / 38 CE: Death of Drusilla and the apotheosis of women

The sister of Caligula, Drusilla was the first Roman woman to receive apotheosis. After her death 10 June, she was deified by Senate decree on 23 Sept. when a senator and former praetor swore he had seen her ascension. From Forum Vibii Caburrum (Cavorre) near Turin an inscription erected by Marcia Secunda identified her as a flaminica diva Drusilla (CIL 5.7345). Afterward Claudius had his grandmother Livia become the second woman to be deified as Julia Augusta, placed her statue in the Temple of Augustus, and made the Vestales Virgines her priestesses. The others who would be deified were Claudia Augusta, the infant daughter of Nero by Poppaea (Tacitus, Annales 15.23.4; 16.6.3); Poppaea (Tacitus, Annales 16.21.2); Flavia Domitilla, the daughter of Vespasianus; Trajan's wife Plotina, his sister Marciana, and his niece Matilda; Hadrianus' wife Sabina; Faustina, the wife of Antonius Pius; and Faustina, the wife of Marcus Aurelius.


The Ficus Ruminalis

"In the Forum even, and in the very midst of the Comitium of Rome, a fig-tree is carefully cultivated, in memory of the consecration which took place on the occasion of a thunderbolt5 which once fell on that spot; and still more, as a memorial of the fig-tree which in former days overshadowed Romulus and Remus, the founders of our empire, in the Lupercal Cave. This tree received the name of 'ruminalis,' from the circumstance that under it the wolf was found giving the breast--rumis it was called in those days--to the two infants. A group in bronze was afterwards erected to consecrate the remembrance of this miraculous event, as, through the agency of Attus Navius the augur, the tree itself had passed spontaneously from its original locality to the Comitium in the Forum. And not without some direful presage is it that that tree has withered away, though, thanks to the care of the priesthood, it has been since replaced. There was another fig-tree also, before the temple of Saturn, which was removed on the occasion of a sacrifice made by the Vestal Virgins, it being found that its roots were gradually undermining the statue of the God Silvanus." ~ Plinius Secundus, Historia Naturalis 15.20 (77)


Our thought for today is from the Golden Sayings of Epicurus 47:

"I have anticipated you, Fortune, and entrenched myself against all your secret attacks. And we will not give ourselves up as captives to you or to any other circumstance; but when it is time for us to go, spitting contempt on life and on those who here vainly cling to it, we will leave life crying aloud in a glorious triumph-song that we have lived well."
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66588 From: lichtbroeder Date: 2009-06-10
Subject: LARARIUM, STATUES AND OIL LAMPS
Would any one be interested in a full size home lararium? It stands 6' tall and was built in two sections: a rectangular lower half about 40" tall or so, upon which statues and offerings may be placed, with this being surmounted by an upper half consisting of a pediment roof supported by columns. The lararium is made of wood, and is painted to look like black and red marble, with gold embellishments. A large plaque (bronze finish) of Dionysus sharing wine with Eros (a copy of a bar relief by Thorvaldsen) is set into the base. This lararium isn't a copy of anything in particular, but it does have a "period" look to it and was lovingly crafted - doesn't look like a cheap theater prop.

I also have several statues and busts, if interested: a 12 inch bust of Zeus-Amon, a 12 inch bust of Neptune, (both plaster with a bronze/marble finish), a statue of a dancing faun playing cymbals (about 24" tall) and a large statue of Marcellus (original in the Louvre), depicted as Mercurius Orator, this being about 40" tall with a bronze/marble finish. IIn addition, I have metal olive oil lamps!

I am asking just $100 for EVERYTHING, mainly because I need the space. Will send photos upon request. I am not a dealer - I built the lararium and used these things at one time in religious context. I live in Cambridge, Mass. Contact me at: jaegerstatter@...
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66589 From: PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@aol.com Date: 2009-06-10
Subject: Re: Intercessio
Fl. Galerius Aurelianus Tribunus Plebis L.Coruncanius Cato sal.

It is one thing to point out that a Tribune has not followed the specifics of a law about the proper application of the Lex Labiena de intercessione and/or the Lex Didia Gemina de potestate tribunicia so as to insure that an intercessio will stand.  However, it is quite another thing when you state that a properly applied intercessio is illegal.  Every citizen has the right to state that they do not agree with an intercessio and ask that the Tribune withdraw it.  Every citizen has the right to point out their opinion about why an intercessio is not worded well or why they believe it is not in accordance with a specific law.  NO ONE has the right to interfere with the official action of a Tribunus Plebis, do violence to a Tribunus Plebis in the course of his or her official duties, or refuse to abide by the legal exercise of intercessio.

If you want to continue to act and think and say what you will, do so.  I stated that you were dangerously close to violating a certain portion of the Lex Didia Gemina de potestate tribunicia.    

I supported you in the last election because I felt that you had a decent grasp of our Constitution and by-laws.  I recommend that you study the laws that are specific to the office of tribune to avoid any unfortunate results.

Vale.


-----Original Message-----
From: l.coruncanius_cato@...
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups. com
Sent: Tue, 9 Jun 2009 1:48 pm
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Intercessio



L. Coruncanius Cato Galerio Aureliano Tribunus Plebis SPD,

Sorry if saying what I think is viewed as "interfering with the official action of a Tribunus Plebis".

I said what I thought, and still think, and I will not step back. I must advise you about the last message from Equitius Cato, who told your cousin and also Tribune his intercessio is not valid, IMHO, it should be considered an interference to a Tribune's action, and sensitive of applying the full wheight of Summa Coercendi Potestas.

I humbly ask you to read some further messages of mine, when I state clearly that all Tribunes have their own mind and must act on their own will. I don't believe this is interfering with a Tribunus action. As I said during the contio in april, I abide the law.
But I ask you too to not place words I have not said in my mouth and after issue a threat like this, because I will defend my self.

Di vos incolumem custodiant.
--
L. Coruncanius Ca to
Aedilis Curulis
Scriba Consulis Hispaniae

--- El lun, 8/6/09, PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@ aol.com <PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@ aol.com> escribió:

De: PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@ aol.com <PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@ aol.com>
Asunto: Re: [Nova-Roma] Intercessio
Para: Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com
Fecha: lunes, 8 junio, 2009 7:43

Fl. Galerius Aurelianus Tribunus Plebis L. Coruncanio Cato. sal.

Your message comes dangerously close to violating certain sections of the Consitution and the lex Dida Genima de potestate tribunicia could be applied.  I recommend that you withdraw the statement and rephrase it with terms such as "in your opinion."  If you continue to interfere with the official action of a Tribunus Plebis, I will bring the weight of the Summa Coercendi Potestas against you.  The same applies to any other citizen who interferes with the official action of a Tribunus Plebis.

Vale.



-----Original Message-----
From: Lucius Coruncanius Cato <l.coruncanius_ cato@yahoo. com>
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com
Sent: Mon, 8 Jun 2009 4:56 am
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Intercessio



L. Coruncanius Cato omn. spd,

I am with you, Venator, in this statement. Time for vetoing the candidacy ended with the contio. Now it is time to move forward. This intercesio is not only unlawful, as it comes long past the 72h period, but a very dangerous movement, as it is a long step backwards and sets up a preced ent for those who doesn't like the results of an election. One might not like the results, but trying to overturn them by veto is really antidemocratic, and those gestures are only seen in places where the voice of citizens or members means less than wet paper.

I also agree with the needing of rewriting some of the laws involved in this election, to make them pristine clear, with words stating what they intend to mean, and permitting no interpretation. I sent a proposal to the Law Review commitee on those leges, which has been ignored by most of those who complain about the meaning and interpretation of those laws.

This shows, to me, that these actions and wills from those persons are not for the better of NR, but an intent to bring down all what has been accomplished for the last 11 years. I know coexistence is hard sometimes, but we have to carry on with it. And Venator shows this spirit by not resigning when he does not like something, and by the will to be part of the solution, and not of the problem.

I too ask for the tribunes to block this intercessio, even when it is not legal and should not be placed, and I humbly ask you, tribune Agrippa, to think about20what you are doing, why yo do it, and what are the effects.

Di vos incolumem custodiant.

--
L. Coruncanius Cato
Aedilis Curulis
Scriba Consulis Hispaniae

--- El dom, 7/6/09, Publius Ullerius Stephanus Venator <famila.ulleria. venii@gmail. com> escri bió:

De: Publius Ullerius Stephanus Venator <famila.ulleria. venii@gmail. com>
Asunto: Re: [Nova-Roma] Intercessio
Para: Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com
Fecha: domingo, 7 junio, 2009 7:11

Avete Omnes;

I ask the other tribunes, as a long time Cives Nova Roma, to help
things move along by opposing this Intercession.

I was a voice, albeit a fairly quiet one, in opposition to the
candidacy of Modianus for Censor.

I still believe the Law under which his candidacy was touted as legal
and opposed as illegal is poorly written and too open to
interpretation. Our Laws need clarity, brevity and simplicity. Law
must not only be for the lawyers, it must be primarily for the
understanding by and protection of the People.

We must needs not try and cover every situation; having macronational
law, statute and regulation, which supersedes what we do here.

However, the Vox Populi has been heard, and is that not the true
foundation of any Res Publica? If the People do not contest the
legitimacy of a Law, it stands.

The majo rity of the People, by their resounding silence, also lent
tacit approval to the candidacy of Modianus. This intercession is, in
my opinion, an ex post facto attempt at what should have been resolved
during the discussion before the Cista opened.

By the vote count and tally, Modianus has the confidence of a majority
of the members of the Centuries.

Yes, this note has an air of resignation about it; what's done is
done, que sera, sera.

There are problems, which need to be addressed, and I will try better
to be a part of the solution. I am not considering leaving, neither
the Senate, the Lictorship nor Nova Roma, though I will step back from
committee and scribal appointments to ponder things. (...and, yes, I
realize I'd already been a bit withdrawn in those arenas already.) I
need time to think.

To my friends herein, I know this is unexpected, but did you really
see something different coming, in light of my nature?

I have made no enemies in Nova Roma, though there are a few who I find
useless to the future of our endeavor. I shall no longer respond to
them, neither directly nor indirectly, neither here nor elsewhere.

In closing, I ask again that the other Tribunes block this
Intercession and be more proactive in the future.

============ ========= ========= ========= ==
In amicitia et fides -
Publius Ullerius Stephanus Venator
Ci vis circa Quintilis MMDCCLI a.u.c.
Senator et Lictor

Religio Septentrionalis - Poeta
------------ --------- --------- ---
May the Holy Powers smile on our efforts.
May the Spirits of our family lines nod in approval.
May we be of Worth to our fellow Nova Romans.


Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66590 From: PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@aol.com Date: 2009-06-10
Subject: Re: Intercessio!
Sortilege is not under the sphere of Iuppiter Optimus Maximus because it was not a method that was used by the augurs.  Sortilege was found in a number of temples throughout the Roman world (especially Venus nd Fortuna) but I am not sure it was ever used in a temple dedicated to IOM.  Now if the ties in the election had been decided by the auspices being taken according to the signs of heaven, the flight of raptor birds, the sound of birds, and by the quadrapeds (horses, dogs, and wolves); then IOM would have been the one to decide the election.

Please be accurate in your posts, Pontifex Maximo, because more than Dii Immortales are watching.

Fl. Galerius Aurelianus
Pontifex


-----Original Message-----
From: marcushoratius <MHoratius@...>
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tue, 9 Jun 2009 2:38 pm
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Intercessio!



M. Moravius C. Cato s. p. d.

What you said below, that either Consul could have rejected Modianus' candidacy is true. The Custodes could have, as you say, refused to certify his election by some flaw. However, neither the Consules nor the Custodes did. And if the argument is thus that by accepting Modianus as a candidate they erred, then the time to do so would have been within seventy-two hours of the Consul announcing who had been accepted as candidates. Do so after the election was already held is contrary to the law. He must give his reason for why the election process itself, and/or the certification process was flawed. The issue over Modianus' candidacy expired before voting began.

Then, too, you forget who else was involved in this process, for tie votes of the Centuriata were decided by casting lots. Sortition is a matter under the prorogative of Jupiter Optimus Maximus. In the end He is the one who really decided the results. Thus it could be argued that the Tribunus defied not only the will of the People but also the will of the Gods, who apparently did not reject Modianus' candidacy or else They might have cast the lots in your favor.

At any rate, I don't agree that we are left with only one Censor really. If the intercessio stands then there will have to be a new election held. You cannot win by default, Cato, as you gained neither a majority of the Centuriata from the votes of the People, nor by the sortition overseen by the Gods.

If asked, I shall perform an augurium on whether the Gods have indeed accepted Modianus as Censor suffectus to confirm whether They approved of the sortition. It is a matter for the Augurs to consider.

Vale et vade in Deo

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com, "Gaius Equitius Cato" <mlcinnyc@.. .> wrote:
>
> Cato Moravio Piscino sal.
>
> Salve.
>
> Vipsanius' veto says that since the very basis upon which these results are being presented is flawed, and the basis upon which the consuls are accepting them is equally flawed, they cannot be either certified or accepted under our law. The analogy might be drawn between a manufacturer, a parts tester, and an inspector.
>
> Say a car is manufactured, and the brakes are faulty. The parts test results miss the flaw and it is passed. An inspector finds the fault in the brakes and returns the car to the manufacturer, saying that the testers were incorrect and that the car in is inherently flawed and cannot be driven. It doesn't matter if the publicity stills are in magazines already, or the ad campaign is in full swing, or even if the manufacturer has received tens of thousands of orders. If the car is flawed it cannot be driven.
>
> Certification and acceptance of the results are two more opportunities we have to protect the law of the Respublica; where they failed earlier, the tribunes can uphold the law in this instance. In fact, the custodes could have refused to certify the results on the same basis, that they are flawed by virtue of the candidate's inability to stand for the office. The consuls and praetors have the same opportunity, but it is clearly not in their interests (personal/political , that is, as following the law is demonstrably not within their concept of the well-being of the Respublica) to do so.
>
> Right now, by the virtue of the tribune's veto in accordance with our law, we have a sole censor in office, Galerius Paulinus.
>
> Vale,
>
> Cato
>
>
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com, "marcushoratius" <MHoratius@> wrote:
> >
> > Salve Cato
> >
> > The only problem with your reasoning here is the discrepency between Agrippa's veto against the actions of magistrates and the reasoning he gave behind it. The reasoning he gave really concerned the candidacy of Modianus, based on an interpretation by Sulla, Gnaeus Caesar, and Potitius as to the meaning of "consecutive. " That was a misinterpretation IMHO. We are nearly six months into the year. The history behind the issue of electing suffecti in Nova Roma, even going back to the time when suffecti were appointed by the Senate, never considered "consecutive" in the way it has been misinterpreted by these few individuals for their own political reasons. The conflict here has nothing to do with the law. None the less...
> >
> > If the problem was in the candidacy then a Tribunus Plebis should have vetoed the candidacy before the Comitia met. That is, he could have vetoed the Consul's acceptance of the candidacy of someone he thought unqualified. That would allow other candidates to be reviewed and "certified" by the Consuls as eligible and the Tribuni given an opportunity to review the eligibility of all candidates prior to the Comitia assembling.
> >
> > However, Tribunus Agrippa vetoed the certification process conducted by the Custodes after the election. He gave no reason as to why he thought that process of certification was in error. Once the candidates were set, the Comitia having already concluded its voting, the issue of candidacies was over. To veto the Custodes over a candidacy is a non sequiter. So what, I would like to know, did the Tribunus see in error with the certification process itself to overthrow what the People had decided? If the Custodes found no error in the election process of the Comitia itself and therefore legally certified the results, then Agrippa's intercessio is without basis and should be withdrawn.
> >
> > Vale
> > M. Moravius Piscinus
> >
> > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com, "Gaius Equitius Cato" <mlcinnyc@> wrote:
> > >
> > > Cato Galerio Aureliano sal.
> > >
> > > Salve.
> > >
> > > Your veto is incorrect, as is most of the argument surrounding this issue. Vipsanius Agrippa has not pronounced intercessio against the right of the People to hold or vote in elections, nor did he veto the results themselves (nor could he, as neither the act of voting nor the results of an election are acts of a magistrate). He has issued a veto against the certification of the results by the custodes and the acceptance of the results by the consuls, which *are* acts of magistrates, based on the fact that he believes the results reflect a violation of the Constitution.
> > >
> > > In point of fact a tribune *can* stop a vote or an election from happening in the first place - this is the law under Nova Roma and was actually practiced by the ancient Romans - so stopping an election or a vote on legislation is *not* un-Roman in the least. It is the assumption - and application - of current post-Enlightenment political theory that makes this seem "unfair", but the ancient Romans would have recognized it as perfectly valid.
> > >
> > > Those who beat the "be Roman, act Roman, follow the Romans" drum should understand that actual ancient Roman political practice was not really in any way democratic or "fair" by contemporary standards.
> > >
> > >
> > > Vale.
> > >
> > > Cato
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com, Robert Levee <galerius_of_ rome@> wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Salve et salvete,
> > > >
> > > > "I, Appius Galerius Aurelianus, tribune of the Plebs,
> > > >
> > > > In application of the paragraph IV.A.7b.of the Constitution of Nova Roma,
> > > >
> > > > Considering the Constitution of Nova Roma and of the laws which applies it and
> > > > define the powers of the tribunes of the Plebs, especially in case of an intercessio,
> > > >
> > > > Considering the message nb 66421 issued in the Forum last Jun 7, 2009 4:32 pm by which
> > > > Tribune G. Vipsanius Agrippa has pronounced "intercessio against the custodes Marcus Lucretius Agricola and
> > > > Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus in certifying the election of Caeso Fabius Buteo
> > > > Modianus as censor and against the consuls Marcus Iulius Severus and Marcus
> > > > Cornelius Complutensis in accepting the election results",
> > > >
> > > > Considering that this intercessio violates the Constitution, and especially its
> > > > article II, B, 3,
> > > >
> > > > Hereby veto the intercession thrown by Tribune G. Vipsanius Agrippa last Jun 7, 2009 4:32 pm."
> > > >
> > > > I have quoted the article II, B, 3 of the constitution. There may be other arguments, but this one (the right of Novaromans to take part in elections) is one of the good grounds here, for a tribune should never be eager to make his own voice prevailing on the People's one.
> > > >
> > > > Vale et valete,
> > > > Ap.Galerius Aurelianus
> > > > Tribune of the Plebs
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66591 From: PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@aol.com Date: 2009-06-10
Subject: Re: Intercessio!
Fl. Galerius Aurelianus Tribunus Plebis.

I agree with the intercessio pronounced by Agrippa.

Valete.


-----Original Message-----
From: PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@...
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 9:27 am
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: Intercessio!



Sortilege is not under the sphere of Iuppiter Optimus Maximus because it was not a method that was used by the augurs.  Sortilege was found in a number of temples throughout the Roman world (especially Venus nd Fortuna) but I am not sure it was ever used in a temple dedicated to IOM.  Now if the ties in the election had been decided by the auspices being taken according to the signs of heaven, the flight of raptor birds, the sound of birds, and by the quadrapeds (horses, dogs, and wolves); then IOM would have been the one to decide the election.

Please be accurate in your posts, Pontifex Maximo, because more than Dii Immortales are watching.

Fl. Galerius Aurelianus
Pontifex


-----Original Message-----
From: marcushoratius <MHoratius@hotmail. com>
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com
Sent: Tue, 9 Jun 2009 2:38 pm
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Intercessio!



M. Moravius C. Cato s. p. d.

What you said below, that either Consul could have rejected Modianus' candidacy is true. The Custodes could have, as you say, refused to certify his election by some flaw. However, neither the Consules nor the Custodes did. And if the argument is thus that by accepting Modianus as a candidate they erred, then the time to do so would have been within seventy-two hours of the Consul announcing who had been accepted as candidates. Do so after the election was already held is contrary to the law. He must give his reason for why the election process itself, and/or the certification process was flawed. The issue over Modianus' candidacy expired before voting began.

Then, too, you forget who else was involved in this process, for tie votes of the Centuriata were decided by casting lots. Sortition is a matter under the prorogative of Jupiter Optimus Maximus. In the end He is the one who really decided the results. Thus it could be argued that the Tribunus defied not only the will of the People but also the will of the Gods, who apparently did not reject Modianus' candidacy or else They might have cast the lots in your favor.

At any rate, I don't agree that we are left with only one Censor really. If the intercessio stands then there will have to be a new election held. You cannot win by default, Cato, as you gained neither a majority of the Centuriata from the votes of the People, nor by the sortition overseen by the Gods.

If asked, I shall perform an augurium on whether the Gods have indeed accepted Modianus as Censor suffectus to confirm whether They approved of the sortition. It is a matter for the Augurs to consider.

Vale et vade in Deo

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com, "Gaius Equitius Cato" <mlcinnyc@.. .> wrote:
>
> Cato Moravio Piscino sal.
>
> Salve.
>
> Vipsanius' veto says that since the very basis upon which these results are being presented is flawed, and the basis upon which the consuls are accepting them is equally flawed, they cannot be either certified or accepted under our law. The analogy might be drawn between a manufacturer, a parts tester, and an inspector.
>
> Say a car is manufactured, and the brakes are faulty. The parts test results miss the flaw and it is passed. An inspector finds the fault in the brakes and returns the car to the manufacturer, saying that the testers were incorrect and that the car in is inherently flawed and cannot be driven. It doesn't matter if the publicity stills are in magazines already, or the ad campaign is in full swing, or even if the manufacturer has received tens of thousands of orders. If the car is flawed it cannot be driven.
>
> Certification and acceptance of the results are two more opportunities we have to protect the law of the Respublica; where they failed earlier, the tribunes can uphold the law in this instance. In fact, the custodes could have refused to certify the results on the same basis, that they are flawed by virtue of the candidate's inability to stand for the office. The consuls and praetors have the same opportunity, but it is clearly not in their interests (personal/political , that is, as following the law is demonstrably not within their concept of the well-being of the Respublica) to do so.
>
> Right now, by the virtue of the tribune's veto in accordance with our law, we have a sole censor in office, Galerius Paulinus.
>
> Vale,
>
> Cato
>
>
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com, "marcushoratius" <MHoratius@> wrote:
> >
> > Salve Cato
> >
> > The only problem with your reasoning here is the discrepency between Agrippa's veto against the actions of magistrates and the reasoning he gave behind it. The reasoning he gave really concerned the candidacy of Modianus, based on an interpretation by Sulla, Gnaeus Caesar, and Potitius as to the meaning of "consecutive. " That was a misinterpretation IMHO. We are nearly six months into the year. The history behind the issue of electing suffecti in Nova Roma, even going back to the time when suffecti were appointed by the Senate, never considered "consecutive" in the way it has been misinterpreted by these few individuals for their own political reasons. The conflict here has nothing to do with the law. None the less...
> >
> > If the problem was in the candidacy then a Tribunus Plebis should have vetoed the candidacy before the Comitia met. That is, he could have vetoed the Consul's acceptance of the candidacy of someone he thought unqualified. That would allow other candidates to be reviewed and "certified" by the Consuls as eligible and the Tribuni given an opportunity to review the eligibility of all candidates prior to the Comitia assembling.
> >
> > However, Tribunus Agrippa vetoed the certification process conducted by the Custodes after the election. He gave no reason as to why he thought that process of certification was in error. Once the candidates were set, the Comitia having already concluded its voting, the issue of candidacies was over. To veto the Custodes over a candidacy is a non sequiter. So what, I would like to know, did the Tribunus see in error with the certification process itself to overthrow what the People had decided? If the Custodes found no error in the election process of the Comitia itself and therefore legally certified the results, then Agrippa's intercessio is without basis and should be withdrawn.
> >
> > Vale
> > M. Moravius Piscinus
> >
> > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com, "Gaius Equitius Cato" <mlcinnyc@> wrote:
> > >
> > > Cato Galerio Aureliano sal.
> > >
> > > Salve.
> > >
> > > Your veto is incorrect, as is most of the argument surrounding this issue. Vipsanius Agrippa has not pronounced intercessio against the right of the People to hold or vote in elections, nor did he veto the results themselves (nor could he, as neither the act of voting nor the results of an election are acts of a magistrate). He has issued a veto against the certification of the results by the custodes and the acceptance of the results by the consuls, which *are* acts of magistrates, based on the fact that he believes the results reflect a violation of the Constitution.
> > >
> > > In point of fact a tribune *can* stop a vote or an election from happening in the first place - this is the law under Nova Roma and was actually practiced by the ancient Romans - so stopping an election or a vote on legislation is *not* un-Roman in the least. It is the assumption - and application - of current post-Enlightenment political theory that makes this seem "unfair", but the ancient Romans would have recognized it as perfectly valid.
> > >
> > > Those who beat the "be Roman, act Roman, follow the Romans" drum should understand that actual ancient Roman political practice was not really in any way democratic or "fair" by contemporary standards.
> > >
> > >
> > > Vale.
> > >
> > > Cato
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com, Robert Levee <galerius_of_ rome@> wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Salve et salvete,
> > > >
> > > > "I, Appius Galerius Aurelianus, tribune of the Plebs,
> > > >
> > > > In application of the paragraph IV.A.7b.of the Constitution of Nova Roma,
> > > >
> > > > Considering the Constitution of Nova Roma and of the laws which applies it and
> > > > define the powers of the tribunes of the Plebs, especially in case of an intercessio,
> > > >
> > > > Considering the message nb 66421 issued in the Forum last Jun 7, 2009 4:32 pm by which
> > > > Tribune G. Vipsanius Agrippa has pronounced "intercessio against the custodes Marcus Lucretius Agricola and
> > > > Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus in certifying the election of Caeso Fabius Buteo
> > > > Modianus as censor and against the consuls Marcus Iulius Severus and Marcus
> > > > Cornelius Complutensis in accepting the election results",
> > > >
> > > > Considering that this intercessio violates the Constitution, and especially its
> > > > article II, B, 3,
> > > >
> > > > Hereby veto the intercession thrown by Tribune G. Vipsanius Agrippa last Jun 7, 2009 4:32 pm."
> > > >
> > > > I have quoted the article II, B, 3 of the constitution. There may be other arguments, but this one (the right of Novaromans to take part in elections) is one of the good grounds here, for a tribune should never be eager to make his own voice prevailing on the People's one.
> > > >
> > > > Vale et valete,
> > > > Ap.Galerius Aurelianus
> > > > Tribune of the Plebs
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66592 From: PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@aol.com Date: 2009-06-10
Subject: Intercessio - End of the period allotted for tribuni plebis to state
Fl. Galerius Aurelianus Tribunus Plebis s.p.d.

Under the Constitution, the lex Labiena de intercessione, and the lex Didia Gemina de poteste tribunicia--

It has been 72 hours since the following intercessio was issued: 

"Tribunus Plebis Gaius Vipsanius Agrippa SPD

I pronounce intercessio against the custodes Marcus Lucretius Agricola and Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus in certifying the election of Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus as censor and against the consuls Marcus Iulius Severus and Marcus Cornelius Complutensis in accepting the election results. 

This action was requested by Senator Gnaeus Iulius Caesar, Senator Lucius Cornelius Sulla Felix, Quintus Valerius Poplicola, and Marcus Valerius Potitus.

Modianus cannot hold the office of censor. This would violate Section 1 of the Lex Cornelia Iunia de definitione intervallorum magistratuum; "no person shall hold the office of censor consecutively" with Section IV A of the constitution as the definition of the term 'office of censor'.

As the Lex Cornelia Iunia de definitione intervallorum magistratuum does not define the term 'office of censor', the Constitution is used by virtue of Section I B, giving precedence to the constitution as the highest legal authority.

The censorship is measured in a 2 year term and cannot be subdivided. Modianus cannot hold the office consecutively.

Gaius Vipsanius Agrippa
Tribunus Plebis"

Of the remaining four Tribunes, one has agreed with the intercessio, one has withdrawn his disagreement & thus abstained, and the remaining two have also abstained.

As such, the action which was vetoed shall be allowed to take effect starting immediately.

I call for a new election for Censor to begin within thirty days of this date.

Valete



-----Original Message-----
From: PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@...
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 9:33 am
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: Intercessio!



Fl. Galerius Aurelianus Tribunus Plebis.

I agree with the intercessio pronounced by Agrippa.

Valete.


-----Original Message-----
From: PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@ aol.com
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com
Sent: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 9:27 am
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: Intercessio!



Sortilege is not under the sphere of Iuppiter Optimus Maximus because it was not a method that was used by the augurs.  Sortilege was found in a number of temples throughout the Roman world (especially Venus nd Fortuna) but I am not sure it was ever used in a temple dedicated to IOM.  Now if the ties in the election had been decided by the auspices being taken according to the signs of heaven, the flight of raptor birds, the sound of birds, and by the quadrapeds (horses, dogs, and wolves); then IOM would have been the one to decide the election.

Please be accurate in your posts, Pontifex Maximo, because more than Dii Immortales are watching.

Fl. Galerius Aurelianus
Pontifex


-----Original Message-----
From: marcushoratius <MHoratius@hotmail. com>
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com
Sent: Tue, 9 Jun 2009 2:38 pm
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Intercessio!



M. Moravius C. Cato s. p. d.

What you said below, that either Consul could have rejected Modianus' candidacy is true. The Custodes could have, as you say, refused to certify his election by some flaw. However, neither the Consules nor the Custodes did. And if the argument is thus that by accepting Modianus as a candidate they erred, then the time to do so would have been within seventy-two hours of the Consul announcing who had been accepted as candidates. Do so after the election was already held is contrary to the law. He must give his reason for why the election process itself, and/or the certification process was flawed. The issue over Modianus' candidacy expired before voting began.

Then, too, you forget who else was involved in this process, for tie votes of the Centuriata were decided by casting lots. Sortition is a matter under the prorogative of Jupiter Optimus Maximus. In the end He is the one who really decided the results. Thus it could be argued that the Tribunus defied not only the will of the People but also the will of the Gods, who apparently did not reject Modianus' candidacy or else They might have cast the lots in your favor.

At any rate, I don't agree that we are left with only one Censor really. If the intercessio stands then there will have to be a new election held. You cannot win by default, Cato, as you gained neither a majority of the Centuriata from the votes of the People, nor by the sortition overseen by the Gods.

If asked, I shall perform an augurium on whether the Gods have indeed accepted Modianus as Censor suffectus to confirm whether They approved of the sortition. It is a matter for the Augurs to consider.

Vale et vade in Deo

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com, "Gaius Equitius Cato" <mlcinnyc@.. .> wrote:
>
> Cato Moravio Piscino sal.
>
> Salve.
>
> Vipsanius' veto says that since the very basis upon which these results are being presented is flawed, and the basis upon which the consuls are accepting them is equally flawed, they cannot be either certified or accepted under our law. The analogy might be drawn between a manufacturer, a parts tester, and an inspector.
>
> Say a car is manufactured, and the brakes are faulty. The parts test results miss the flaw and it is passed. An inspector finds the fault in the brakes and returns the car to the manufacturer, saying that the testers were incorrect and that the car in is inherently flawed and cannot be driven. It doesn't matter if the publicity stills are in magazines already, or the ad campaign is in full swing, or even if the manufacturer has received tens of thousands of orders. If the car is flawed it cannot be driven.
>
> Certification and acceptance of the results are two more opportunities we have to protect the law of the Respublica; where they failed earlier, the tribunes can uphold the law in this instance. In fact, the custodes could have refused to certify the results on the same basis, that they are flawed by virtue of the candidate's inability to stand for the office. The consuls and praetors have the same opportunity, but it is clearly not in their interests (personal/political , that is, as following the law is demonstrably not within their concept of the well-being of the Respublica) to do so.
>
> Right now, by the virtue of the tribune's veto in accordance with our law, we have a sole censor in office, Galerius Paulinus.
>
> Vale,
>
> Cato
>
>
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com, "marcushoratius" <MHoratius@> wrote:
> >
> > Salve Cato
> >
> > The only problem with your reasoning here is the discrepency between Agrippa's veto against the actions of magistrates and the reasoning he gave behind it. The reasoning he gave really concerned the candidacy of Modianus, based on an interpretation by Sulla, Gnaeus Caesar, and Potitius as to the meaning of "consecutive. " That was a misinterpretation IMHO. We are nearly six months into the year. The history behind the issue of electing suffecti in Nova Roma, even going back to the time when suffecti were appointed by the Senate, never considered "consecutive" in the way it has been misinterpreted by these few individuals for their own political reasons. The conflict here has nothing to do with the law. None the less...
> >
> > If the problem was in the candidacy then a Tribunus Plebis should have vetoed the candidacy before the Comitia met. That is, he could have vetoed the Consul's acceptance of the candidacy of someone he thought unqualified. That would allow other candidates to be reviewed and "certified" by the Consuls as eligible and the Tribuni given an opportunity to review the eligibility of all candidates prior to the Comitia assembling.
> >
> > However, Tribunus Agrippa vetoed the certification process conducted by the Custodes after the election. He gave no reason as to why he thought that process of certification was in error. Once the candidates were set, the Comitia having already concluded its voting, the issue of candidacies was over. To veto the Custodes over a candidacy is a non sequiter. So what, I would like to know, did the Tribunus see in error with the certification process itself to overthrow what the People had decided? If the Custodes found no error in the election process of the Comitia itself and therefore legally certified the results, then Agrippa's intercessio is without basis and should be withdrawn.
> >
> > Vale
> > M. Moravius Piscinus
> >
> > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com, "Gaius Equitius Cato" <mlcinnyc@> wrote:
> > >
> > > Cato Galerio Aureliano sal.
> > >
> > > Salve.
> > >
> > > Your veto is incorrect, as is most of the argument surrounding this issue. Vipsanius Agrippa has not pronounced intercessio against the right of the People to hold or vote in elections, nor did he veto the results themselves (nor could he, as neither the act of voting nor the results of an election are acts of a magistrate). He has issued a veto against the certification of the results by the custodes and the acceptance of the results by the consuls, which *are* acts of magistrates, based on the fact that he believes the results reflect a violation of the Constitution.
> > >
> > > In point of fact a tribune *can* stop a vote or an election from happening in the first place - this is the law under Nova Roma and was actually practiced by the ancient Romans - so stopping an election or a vote on legislation is *not* un-Roman in the least. It is the assumption - and application - of current post-Enlightenment political theory that makes this seem "unfair", but the ancient Romans would have recognized it as perfectly valid.
> > >
> > > Those who beat the "be Roman, act Roman, follow the Romans" drum should understand that actual ancient Roman political practice was not really in any way democratic or "fair" by contemporary standards.
> > >
> > >
> > > Vale.
> > >
> > > Cato
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com, Robert Levee <galerius_of_ rome@> wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Salve et salvete,
> > > >
> > > > "I, Appius Galerius Aurelianus, tribune of the Plebs,
> > > >
> > > > In application of the paragraph IV.A.7b.of the Constitution of Nova Roma,
> > > >
> > > > Considering the Constitution of Nova Roma and of the laws which applies it and
> > > > define the powers of the tribunes of the Plebs, especially in case of an intercessio,
> > > >
> > > > Considering the message nb 66421 issued in the Forum last Jun 7, 2009 4:32 pm by which
> > > > Tribune G. Vipsanius Agrippa has pronounced "intercessio against the custodes Marcus Lucretius Agricola and
> > > > Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus in certifying the election of Caeso Fabius Buteo
> > > > Modianus as censor and against the consuls Marcus Iulius Severus and Marcus
> > > > Cornelius Complutensis in accepting the election results",
> > > >
> > > > Considering that this intercessio violates the Constitution, and especially its
> > > > article II, B, 3,
> > > >
> > > > Hereby veto the intercession thrown by Tribune G. Vipsanius Agrippa last Jun 7, 2009 4:32 pm."
> > > >
> > > > I have quoted the article II, B, 3 of the constitution. There may be other arguments, but this one (the right of Novaromans to take part in elections) is one of the good grounds here, for a tribune should never be eager to make his own voice prevailing on the People's one.
> > > >
> > > > Vale et valete,
> > > > Ap.Galerius Aurelianus
> > > > Tribune of the Plebs
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66593 From: Jesse Corradino Date: 2009-06-10
Subject: Re: Another little brag. . .
There aren't seriously people who make sauce with ketchup, are there?  I'm crying blood!
 
> To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> From: dis_pensible@...
> Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2009 21:48:12 +0000
> Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Another little brag. . .
>
> Salve Jesse,
>
> I have seen so many different kinds of Lasagna, including "white" Lasagna, which is...well... different. I am not crazy about chicken or meatballs in my Lasagna either.
> But hey, if you made Lasagna with crumbled eggs I would probably eat it;)...and like it.
> I have enjoyed many dishes in different regions of Italy with the same names but sometimes they differed in ingredients and preparation (Braciole is one of them). I remember sumptuous eggplant and fish dishes in Calabria, but it has been a while.
> I think that is one of the wonderful and enriching aspects of living in an area with a diverse population are the differences. I do draw the line at tomato sauce made from Ketchup though.*laugh* Or...cottage cheese in Lasagna rather than Ricotta.
> Ok there is theme here. I like Ricotta;) In fact as soon as I build up the courage i am going to try and make my own.
>
> Vale,
> Julia
>
>
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Jesse Corradino <woden66@...> wrote:
> >
> >
> > That isn't true at all. Everyone I know makes lasagna with hard boiled eggs crumbled through it. Maybe they don't make it that way in the Oliver Garden or down south, but I have an entire chunk of Calabria to back me up on this.
> >
> > > To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> > > From: livia.plauta@...
> > > Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2009 17:08:56 +0000
> > > Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Another little brag. . .
> > >
> > > Salvete,
> > > but which planet do you live on? Lasagna needs hard boiled egg like a fish needs a bicycle!
> > >
> > > Valete,
> > > Livia
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
> <*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma/
>
> <*> Your email settings:
> Individual Email | Traditional
>
> <*> To change settings online go to:
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma/join
> (Yahoo! ID required)
>
> <*> To change settings via email:
> mailto:Nova-Roma-digest@yahoogroups.com
> mailto:Nova-Roma-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com
>
> <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
> <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
> http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>


Lauren found her dream laptop. Find the PC that’s right for you.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66594 From: M.C.C. Date: 2009-06-10
Subject: Re: Intercessio - End of the period allotted for tribuni plebis to s
Marcus Curiatius Complutensis Consul Tribunibus Plebis omnes civibusque SPD


Tribunus Plebis Gaius Vipsanius Agrippa has pronounced intercessio in name of the following citizens: Senator Gnaeus Iulius Caesar, Senator Lucius Cornelius Sulla Felix, Quintus Valerius Poplicola, and Marcus Valerius Potitus.

This pronouncement is according with the Lex Didia Gemina de potestate tribunicia II.A.1.a

Tribunus Plebis Gaius Vipsanius Agrippa has pronounced intercessio "against custodes Marcus Lucretius Agricola and Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus and against the consuls Marcus Iulius Severus and Marcus Cornelius Complutensis". 

In accordance with the Lex Didia Gemina de potestate tribunicia II.A.1.b the intercessio of the Tribuni must include the official name and office of the magistrate(s) against whose act or acts the intercessio or auxilium has been interposed. The intercessio is invalid because one of the consuls is not member of Gens Cornelia.

In accordance with the Lex Didia Gemina de potestate tribunicia II.A.1.c the intercessio of the Tribuni must include the article(s) of the Constitution or the leges violated by the magistrate's act(s).

In accordance with the Lex Didia Gemina de potestate tribunicia II.A.2. if the intercessio of a Tribunus Plebis does not include these three elements, the intercessio shall be invalid.

The intercessio of  the Tribuni Plebis is invalid.

Curate ut valeatis

M. Curiatius Complutensis
Consul

PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@... escribió:

Fl. Galerius Aurelianus Tribunus Plebis s.p.d.

Under the Constitution, the lex Labiena de intercessione, and the lex Didia Gemina de poteste tribunicia--

It has been 72 hours since the following intercessio was issued: 

"Tribunus Plebis Gaius Vipsanius Agrippa SPD

I pronounce intercessio against the custodes Marcus Lucretius Agricola and Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus in certifying the election of Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus as censor and against the consuls Marcus Iulius Severus and Marcus Cornelius Complutensis in accepting the election results. 

This action was requested by Senator Gnaeus Iulius Caesar, Senator Lucius Cornelius Sulla Felix, Quintus Valerius Poplicola, and Marcus Valerius Potitus.

Modianus cannot hold the office of censor. This would violate Section 1 of the Lex Cornelia Iunia de definitione intervallorum magistratuum; "no person shall hold the office of censor consecutively" with Section IV A of the constitution as the definition of the term 'office of censor'.

As the Lex Cornelia Iunia de definitione intervallorum magistratuum does not define the term 'office of censor', the Constitution is used by virtue of Section I B, giving precedence to the constitution as the highest legal authority.

The censorship is measured in a 2 year term and cannot be subdivided. Modianus cannot hold the office consecutively.

Gaius Vipsanius Agrippa
Tribunus Plebis"

Of the remaining four Tribunes, one has agreed with the intercessio, one has withdrawn his disagreement & thus abstained, and the remaining two have also abstained.

As such, the action which was vetoed shall be allowed to take effect starting immediately.

I call for a new election for Censor to begin within thirty days of this date.

Valete



-----Original Message-----
From: PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@ aol.com
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com
Sent: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 9:33 am
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: Intercessio!



Fl. Galerius Aurelianus Tribunus Plebis.

I agree with the intercessio pronounced by Agrippa.

Valete.


-----Original Message-----
From: PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@ aol.com
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com
Sent: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 9:27 am
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: Intercessio!



Sortilege is not under the sphere of Iuppiter Optimus Maximus because it was not a method that was used by the augurs.  Sortilege was found in a number of temples throughout the Roman world (especially Venus nd Fortuna) but I am not sure it was ever used in a temple dedicated to IOM.  Now if the ties in the election had been decided by the auspices being taken according to the signs of heaven, the flight of raptor birds, the sound of birds, and by the quadrapeds (horses, dogs, and wolves); then IOM would have been the one to decide the election.

Please be accurate in your posts, Pontifex Maximo, because more than Dii Immortales are watching.

Fl. Galerius Aurelianus
Pontifex


-----Original Message-----
From: marcushoratius <MHoratius@hotmail. com>
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com
Sent: Tue, 9 Jun 2009 2:38 pm
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Intercessio!



M. Moravius C. Cato s. p. d.

What you said below, that either Consul could have rejected Modianus' candidacy is true. The Custodes could have, as you say, refused to certify his election by some flaw. However, neither the Consules nor the Custodes did. And if the argument is thus that by accepting Modianus as a candidate they erred, then the time to do so would have been within seventy-two hours of the Consul announcing who had been accepted as candidates. Do so after the election was already held is contrary to the law. He must give his reason for why the election process itself, and/or the certification process was flawed. The issue over Modianus' candidacy expired before voting began.

Then, too, you forget who else was involved in this process, for tie votes of the Centuriata were decided by casting lots. Sortition is a matter under the prorogative of Jupiter Optimus Maximus. In the end He is the one who really decided the results. Thus it could be argued that the Tribunus defied not only the will of the People but also the will of the Gods, who apparently did not reject Modianus' candidacy or else They might have cast the lots in your favor.

At any rate, I don't agree that we are left with only one Censor really. If the intercessio stands then there will have to be a new election held. You cannot win by default, Cato, as you gained neither a majority of the Centuriata from the votes of the People, nor by the sortition overseen by the Gods.

If asked, I shall perform an augurium on whether the Gods have indeed accepted Modianus as Censor suffectus to confirm whether They approved of the sortition. It is a matter for the Augurs to consider.

Vale et vade in Deo

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com, "Gaius Equitius Cato" <mlcinnyc@.. .> wrote:
>
> Cato Moravio Piscino sal.
>
> Salve.
>
> Vipsanius' veto says that since the very basis upon which these results are being presented is flawed, and the basis upon which the consuls are accepting them is equally flawed, they cannot be either certified or accepted under our law. The analogy might be drawn between a manufacturer, a parts tester, and an inspector.
>
> Say a car is manufactured, and the brakes are faulty. The parts test results miss the flaw and it is passed. An inspector finds the fault in the brakes and returns the car to the manufacturer, saying that the testers were incorrect and that the car in is inherently flawed and cannot be driven. It doesn't matter if the publicity stills are in magazines already, or the ad campaign is in full swing, or even if the manufacturer has received tens of thousands of orders. If the car is flawed it cannot be driven.
>
> Certification and acceptance of the results are two more opportunities we have to protect the law of the Respublica; where they failed earlier, the tribunes can uphold the law in this instance. In fact, the custodes could have refused to certify the results on the same basis, that they are flawed by virtue of the candidate's inability to stand for the office. The consuls and praetors have the same opportunity, but it is clearly not in their interests (personal/political , that is, as following the law is demonstrably not within their concept of the well-being of the Respublica) to do so.
>
> Right now, by the virtue of the tribune's veto in accordance with our law, we have a sole censor in office, Galerius Paulinus.
>
> Vale,
>
> Cato
>
>
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com, "marcushoratius" <MHoratius@> wrote:
> >
> > Salve Cato
> >
> > The only problem with your reasoning here is the discrepency between Agrippa's veto against the actions of magistrates and the reasoning he gave behind it. The reasoning he gave really concerned the candidacy of Modianus, based on an interpretation by Sulla, Gnaeus Caesar, and Potitius as to the meaning of "consecutive. " That was a misinterpretation IMHO. We are nearly six months into the year. The history behind the issue of electing suffecti in Nova Roma, even going back to the time when suffecti were appointed by the Senate, never considered "consecutive" in the way it has been misinterpreted by these few individuals for their own political reasons. The conflict here has nothing to do with the law. None the less...
> >
> > If the problem was in the candidacy then a Tribunus Plebis should have vetoed the candidacy before the Comitia met. That is, he could have vetoed the Consul's acceptance of the candidacy of someone he thought unqualified. That would allow other candidates to be reviewed and "certified" by the Consuls as eligible and the Tribuni given an opportunity to review the eligibility of all candidates prior to the Comitia assembling.
> >
> > However, Tribunus Agrippa vetoed the certification process conducted by the Custodes after the election. He gave no reason as to why he thought that process of certification was in error. Once the candidates were set, the Comitia having already concluded its voting, the issue of candidacies was over. To veto the Custodes over a candidacy is a non sequiter. So what, I would like to know, did the Tribunus see in error with the certification process itself to overthrow what the People had decided? If the Custodes found no error in the election process of the Comitia itself and therefore legally certified the results, then Agrippa's intercessio is without basis and should be withdrawn.
> >
> > Vale
> > M. Moravius Piscinus
> >
> > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com, "Gaius Equitius Cato" <mlcinnyc@> wrote:
> > >
> > > Cato Galerio Aureliano sal.
> > >
> > > Salve.
> > >
> > > Your veto is incorrect, as is most of the argument surrounding this issue. Vipsanius Agrippa has not pronounced intercessio against the right of the People to hold or vote in elections, nor did he veto the results themselves (nor could he, as neither the act of voting nor the results of an election are acts of a magistrate). He has issued a veto against the certification of the results by the custodes and the acceptance of the results by the consuls, which *are* acts of magistrates, based on the fact that he believes the results reflect a violation of the Constitution.
> > >
> > > In point of fact a tribune *can* stop a vote or an election from happening in the first place - this is the law under Nova Roma and was actually practiced by the ancient Romans - so stopping an election or a vote on legislation is *not* un-Roman in the least. It is the assumption - and application - of current post-Enlightenment political theory that makes this seem "unfair", but the ancient Romans would have recognized it as perfectly valid.
> > >
> > > Those who beat the "be Roman, act Roman, follow the Romans" drum should understand that actual ancient Roman political practice was not really in any way democratic or "fair" by contemporary standards.
> > >
> > >
> > > Vale.
> > >
> > > Cato
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com, Robert Levee <galerius_of_ rome@> wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Salve et salvete,
> > > >
> > > > "I, Appius Galerius Aurelianus, tribune of the Plebs,
> > > >
> > > > In application of the paragraph IV.A.7b.of the Constitution of Nova Roma,
> > > >
> > > > Considering the Constitution of Nova Roma and of the laws which applies it and
> > > > define the powers of the tribunes of the Plebs, especially in case of an intercessio,
> > > >
> > > > Considering the message nb 66421 issued in the Forum last Jun 7, 2009 4:32 pm by which
> > > > Tribune G. Vipsanius Agrippa has pronounced "intercessio against the custodes Marcus Lucretius Agricola and
> > > > Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus in certifying the election of Caeso Fabius Buteo
> > > > Modianus as censor and against the consuls Marcus Iulius Severus and Marcus
> > > > Cornelius Complutensis in accepting the election results",
> > > >
> > > > Considering that this intercessio violates the Constitution, and especially its
> > > > article II, B, 3,
> > > >
> > > > Hereby veto the intercession thrown by Tribune G. Vipsanius Agrippa last Jun 7, 2009 4:32 pm."
> > > >
> > > > I have quoted the article II, B, 3 of the constitution. There may be other arguments, but this one (the right of Novaromans to take part in elections) is one of the good grounds here, for a tribune should never be eager to make his own voice prevailing on the People's one.
> > > >
> > > > Vale et valete,
> > > > Ap.Galerius Aurelianus
> > > > Tribune of the Plebs
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66595 From: Jesse Corradino Date: 2009-06-10
Subject: Re: Roman cookery
Are there any genuinely tastey roman dishes?  In the last year or so of my life I've committed myself to learn how to cook for two reasons: one, I'm pretty much the last member of my family to keep a lot of our recipes alive and two, I've recently had a daughter (Claudia) who I don't want to see grow up eating frozen food from a grocery store.  Anyway, I really love the hobby and so now I'm always looking meals I can brag about.  One of the reasons I was drawn to Nova Roma was to find out more about this topic, so I'm curious if anyone has some feedback :)
 

 
> To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> From: dis_pensible@...
> Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2009 22:42:25 +0000
> Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Roman cookery
>
> Salve Felix,
>
> I had meant to thank you for this earlier but it got lost, and since we were talking about food today I search for it. I will add some more ancient recipes as time permits;)
> Pasta con sarde is one of my favorites and somewhere in here I believe I can recreate the recipe from when I was growing up.
> The second recipe looks great but i will add either tomato paste or maybe some Roma tomatoes and omit the breadcrumbs. I will save these and experiment sometime in the future;)
>
> Again thank you!
>
> Salve,
> Julia
>
>
>
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "wuffa2001" <magewuffa@...> wrote:
> >
> > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "L Julia Aquila" <dis_pensible@> wrote:
> > >
> > > Salvete
> > >
> > > Anyone have a good recipe for Pasta Con Sarde? And yes I understand from what we know, pasta was not used in Rome however the traditional base for the sauce does have its roots in Roma. Thanks in advance.
> > >
> > > Valete,
> > > Julia
> > >
> >
> > Salve
> > well there this one I like have it 1 to 2 times a year
> >
> > INGREDIENTS (Nutrition)
> >
> > * 1 (16 ounce) package spaghetti
> > * 3/4 cup olive oil, divided
> > * 6 cloves garlic, minced
> > * 2 (4 ounce) cans sardines packed in olive oil, drained
> > * 1 cup seasoned bread crumbs
> > * 1/3 cup freshly grated Parmesan cheese
> > * 1/4 cup chopped fresh parsley
> > * 1 teaspoon ground black pepper
> > * additional Parmesan cheese for serving (optional)
> >
> > DIRECTIONS
> >
> > 1. Bring a large pot of lightly salted water to a boil. Add the spaghetti, and cook until al dente, or 8 to 10 minutes. Drain, and rinse under cold water. Toss with 1/4 cup olive oil, cover and keep warm.
> > 2. Place another 1/4 cup olive oil in a skillet, and heat over medium heat. Stir in the garlic, and cook just until golden, 2 to 3 minutes. Add the sardines, and cook 1 minute more. Stir in the bread crumbs and 1/3 cup Parmesan cheese. If necessary to give the mixture a crumbly texture, stir in the remaining 1/4 cup of olive oil. Stir in the parsley and pepper, and remove from the heat. If desired, serve with additional Parmesan cheese.
> >
> > ==================================================================
> > and this one is good
> >
> > Pasta con le Sarde (Pasta with Sardine Sauce)
> >
> > This is a classic Sicilian dish from Palermo,created when the Saracens ruled Sicily. Sicilians would use the fennel that grows wild in the lava-rich soil which is a more intense taste than the cultivated.
> >
> > * 2 pounds fresh sardines
> > * 1 1/2 pounds bulb fennel, thickly sliced
> > * 1/2 cup olive oil
> > * 2 onions, finely sliced
> > * 4 anchovy filets
> > * 1/2 cup pine nuts
> > * 1/2 cup golden raisins
> > * 1 package saffron
> > * Salt and pepper to taste
> > * 1 pound bucatini
> > * 1 cup breadcrumbs
> >
> > METHOD
> >
> > Preheat oven to 350°F.
> >
> > Remove heads and tails from half the sardines. Cut in 1 inch pieces. Leave second half intact.
> >
> > Wash and trim fennel. Put into pan with about 8 cups cold, salted water. Bring to a boil and cook until tender, about 5- 8 minutes. Remove with slotted spoon, drain in colander, then gently squeeze out water. Chop roughly. Reserve cooking water.
> >
> > Heat 1/4 cup oil in frying pan. Sauté onions over medium heat until golden. Add chopped sardines and anchovies. As they cook, crush sardines with back of spoon to make a thick paste. Add pine nuts, raisins, saffron, salt and pepper.
> >
> > In a separate pan, heat remaining oil and lightly sauté the fennel, removing to a separate bowl. Sauté the remaining whole sardines. Cook until tender, about 10 minutes, turning once gently to not break sardines.
> >
> > Using fennel water, boil pasta until al dente, about 10 -= 12 minutes. Drain. Put in bowl and dress with half the sardine sauce.
> >
> > Put a layer of dressed pasta in an ovenproof casserole. On top of that, put a layer of fennel, then a a layer of whole sardines with additional sauce. Continue until ingredients are used up, ending with a layer of bucatini. Cover with breadcrumbs. Sprinkle breadcrumbs over top. Cover and bake in preheated 350°F oven 15 - 20 minutes.
> >
> > Pasta may be served hot or cold.
> >
> > Serves: 6
> >
> > it is very good Cold
> > ====================================================================
> > and
> >
> > olive oil
> > 1 fennel bulb, trimmed and thinly sliced, fronds reserved for garnish
> > 3 fat cloves garlic, thinly sliced
> > 3-4 anchovy filets
> > 1 28-ounce can whole tomatoes in tomato puree
> > 4-5 basil leaves
> > dry white wine
> > juice of 1 lemon
> > red pepper flakes to taste
> > 1/3 cup golden raisins
> > 1 tin sardines in olive oil
> > Italian flat-leaf parsley, for garnish
> > 1/2 pound spaghetti or linguine
> >
> > Heat olive oil in large skillet over medium heat. Add sliced fennel and cook, stirring, until fennel begins to soften. Add garlic slices and cook until fragrant and garlic begins to soften. Add anchovy filets to skillet and crush them into a paste with the back of a spoon, then stir into the fennel and garlic.
> >
> > Add tomatoes, crushing with the back of the spoon until they're broken up. Throw in the basil leaves, a glug of white wine and and the lemon juice, red pepper flakes, and golden raisins. Stir well, then add sardine filets to the pan and spoon a little sauce over them. Lower heat and simmer for about 30 minutes.
> >
> > At this point, set a large pot of water over high heat. When water comes to a boil add salt (I used about 1 1/2 tablespoons) and stir in the pasta. Cook until al dente.
> >
> > When pasta is ready, break up sardines with the spoon and stir them into the sauce. Add pasta to the sauce along with about 1/2 cup of the pasta cooking water, stir, and simmer until pasta has cooked through.
> >
> > To serve, top with toasted bread crumbs (or a big grating of hard cheese, if you're so inclined), and garnish with fennel fronds or parsley.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Vale
> >
> > MCF take care
> >
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
> <*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma/
>
> <*> Your email settings:
> Individual Email | Traditional
>
> <*> To change settings online go to:
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma/join
> (Yahoo! ID required)
>
> <*> To change settings via email:
> mailto:Nova-Roma-digest@yahoogroups.com
> mailto:Nova-Roma-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com
>
> <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
> <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
> http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>


Windows Liveâ„¢ SkyDriveâ„¢: Get 25 GB of free online storage. Get it on your BlackBerry or iPhone.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66596 From: Roger Date: 2009-06-10
Subject: Re: Intercessio - End of the period allotted for tribuni plebis to s
By "call for a new election", I assume that you mean you request the Consuls to call a new election within 30 days, as I do not believe the Tribunes have authority to call for elections except in the Comitia Plebis Tributa, and, in exceptional circumstances, the Comitia Populi Tributa.

I accept your other statements regarding the intercessio, but I belive the Tribunes authority can only extend to annoucing the effectiveness of the intercessio, but not to calling a new election.

While we're on the subject, had I been a Tribune, I would have disagreed with this particular intercessio (BTW, I voted for Cato, with significant reservations). However, it seems to me that intercessio against individual candidacies cannot be placed after Contio has ended.

Lucius Quintius Constantius

- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@... wrote:
>
> > > Of the remaining four Tribunes, one has agreed with the intercessio, one has withdrawn his disagreement & thus abstained, and the remaining two have also abstained.
>
> As such, the action which was vetoed shall be allowed to take effect starting immediately.
>
> I call for a new election for Censor to begin within thirty days of this date.
>
> Valete
>
>
>
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66597 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2009-06-10
Subject: Re: Intercessio!
Cato Maiori sal.

Salve!

Q.E.D.

Vale!

Cato

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Maior" <rory12001@...> wrote:
>
> M. Hortensia Quiritibus spd;
>
> "Let men approach the gods with purity---let men appear before them in the spirit of devotion---let men remove riches from their temples; whoever does otherwise shall suffer the vengeance of heaven---let no one have private gods---neither new gods nor strange gods, unless publicly acknowledged, are to be worshiped privately---let the temples which our fathers have constructed in the cities, be upheld---let the people maintain the groves in the country, and the abodes of the Lares---let men preserve the customs of their fathers and of their family---let the gods who have been accounted celestial be worshiped, and those likewise who have merited celestial honors by their illustrious actions, such as Hercules, Bacchus, Aesculapius, Castor, Pollux, and Quirinus. Let due honor be likewise paid to those virtues, by which man is exalted to heaven---as Intelligence, Valor, Piety, Fidelity; and let temples be consecrated to their honor-
>
> Let the public Augurs, who are the interpreters of the all-good and all-great Jupiter, likewise examine the presages and the auspices, according to the discipline of their art. Let the priests who are conversant in auguries implore prosperity for the vineyards and gardens, and pray for the general welfare of the people. Let those who give counsel in military or civic affairs attend to the auspices, and be guided by them. Let them guard against the anger of heaven, and appease it; and observe from what part of heaven the lightnings burst forth. Let them declare what lands, cities, and temples, are to be held free and consecrated. Whatever things the augur declares to be unjust, ill-omened, vicious, and accursed, let them be forsaken as prohibited and disastrous, and whoever will not obey these divine indications, let him suffer capital punishment."
> Cicero, De Legibus, On the Laws, 8
>
> "But what shall I say with respect to religion and the auspices; the affront and injury offered to which reflect immediately on the immortal gods. That this city was founded under auspices; that all business, civil, and military,foreign and domestic, is conducted under them " Livy History of Rome 6, 15
>
> "And when the people approved, he [Romulus] appointed a day on which he proposed to consult the auspices concerning the sovereignty; and when the time was come, he rose at break of day and went forth from his tent. Then, taking his stand under the open sky in a clear space and first offering the customary sacrifice, he prayed to King Jupiter and to the other gods whom he had chosen for the patrons of the colony, that, if it was their pleasure he should be king of the city, some favourable signs might appear in the sky."
>
> Dionysius of Halicarnassus, Roman Antiquities,
>
> " One of the greatest advantages of the Roman constitution stems from its conception of divinity. The strength of Roman domination comes from a thing considered a flaw among other men, and by that I mean the reverential fear of the gods."
> Polybius Histories 6.56
>
> may the gods be propitious to us!
> M. Hortensia Maior
>
> >Cato Maior sal.
> >
> > Salve.
> >
> > Oh, please. Piscinus quoted Cicero on lightning; so did I.
> >
> > We can quote Roman authors back and forth on just about anything until we both pass out. So please don't try to pull this "you're against the religio" business again.
> >
> > If the Gods are displeased with me They can certainly take care of Themselves. They don't need you hooting about protecting Them. The same goes for Piscinus, who for all the "it is redundant to say" business keeps hinting that I have blasphemed the Gods by publicly swearing an oath by Them even though my private cultus differs from the State cult.
> >
> > I would like him to say the same thing to *every single magistrate in the Respublica* who has ever taken the oath of office.
> >
> > Vale,
> >
> > Cato
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66598 From: PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@aol.com Date: 2009-06-10
Subject: Re: Intercessio - End of the period allotted for tribuni plebis to s
Fl. Galerius Aurelianus Tribunus Plebis M. Curiatius  Complutensis Consul sal.

I do not find that your post has validity since you could have raised the objection of the nomen at the time it was issued.  However, I recognize who was meant since we only have two consuls in NR.  Only the Tribunes have the authority to agree or disagree with the intercessio of one of their colleagues; or a dictator or interrex.

The Consuls do not have the authority to overturn the intercessio of a Tribunus Plebis after the end of the 72 hours.  If you do not abide by the intercessio, I shall be forced to fine you under the Lex Didia Gemina de potestate tribunica, Section III, A in the amount of thirty U.S. dollars ($30.00) paid to the treasure of Nova Roma and devoted to Ceres.  Such a penalty cannot be suspended or revoked except by intercessio of another Tribunus Plebis or a Praetorian appraisal which should permit the fined citizen further recourse at law under the Lex Salicia Iudiciaria.  The right of provocatio will be respect as Article II.B.5 of the Consitution.

Vale.


-----Original Message-----
From: M.C.C. <complutensis@...>
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 10:21 am
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Intercessio - End of the period allotted for tribuni plebis to state agreement or disagreement.



Marcus Curiatius Complutensis Consul Tribunibus Plebis omnes civibusque SPD


Tribunus Plebis Gaius Vipsanius Agrippa has pronounced intercessio in name of the following citizens: Senator Gnaeus Iulius Caesar, Senator Lucius Cornelius Sulla Felix, Quintus Valerius Poplicola, and Marcus Valerius Potitus.

This pronouncement is according with the Lex Didia Gemina de potestate tribunicia II.A.1.a

Tribunus Plebis Gaius Vipsanius Agrippa has pronounced intercessio "against custodes Marcus Lucretius Agricola and Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus and against the consuls Marcus Iulius Severus and Marcus Cornelius Complutensis" . 

In accordance with the Lex Didia Gemina de potestate tribunicia II.A.1.b the intercessio of the Tribuni must include the official name and office of the magistrate(s) against whose act or acts the intercessio or auxilium has been interposed. The intercessio is invalid because one of the consuls is not member of Gens Cornelia.

In accordance with the Lex Didia Gemina de potestate tribunicia II.A.1.c the intercessio of the Tribuni must include the article(s) of the Constitution or the leges violated by the magistrate's act(s).

In accordance with the Lex Didia Gemina de potestate tribunicia II. A.2. if the intercessio of a Tribunus Plebis does not include these three elements, the intercessio shall be invalid.

The intercessio of  the Tribuni Plebis is invalid.

Curate ut valeatis

M. Curiatius Complutensis
Consul

PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@ aol.com escribió:
Fl. Galerius Aurelianus Tribunus Plebis s.p.d.

Under the Constitution, the lex Labiena de intercessione, and the lex Didia Gemina de poteste tribunicia--

It has been 72 hours since the following intercessio was issued: 

"Tribunus Plebis Gaius Vipsanius Agrippa SPD

I pronounce intercessio against the custodes Marcus Lucretius Agricola and Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus in certifying the election of Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus as censor and against the consuls Marcus Iulius Severus and Marcus Cornelius Complutensis in accepting the election results. 

This action was requested by Senator Gnaeus Iulius Caesar, Senator Lucius Cornelius Sulla Felix, Quintus Valerius Poplicola, and Marcus Valerius Potitus.

Modianus cannot hold the office of censor. This would violate Section 1 of the Lex Cornelia Iunia de definitione intervallorum magistratuum; "no person shall hold the office of censor consecutively" with Section IV A of the constitution as the definition of the term 'office of censor'.

As the Lex Cornelia Iunia de de finitione intervallorum magistratuum does not define the term 'office of censor', the Constitution is used by virtue of Section I B, giving precedence to the constitution as the highest legal authority.

The censorship is measured in a 2 year term and cannot be subdivided. Modianus cannot hold the office consecutively.

Gaius Vipsanius Agrippa
Tribunus Plebis"

Of the remaining four Tribunes, one has agreed with the intercessio, one has withdrawn his disagreement & thus abstained, and the remaining two have also abstained.

As such, the action which was vetoed shall be allowed to take effect starting immediately.

I call for a new election for Censor to begin within thirty days of this date.

Valete



-----Original Message-----
From: PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@ aol.com
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com
Sent: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 9:33 am
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: Intercessio!



Fl. Galerius Aurelianus Tribunus Plebis.

I agree with the intercessio pronounced by Agrippa.

Valete.


-----Original Message-----
From: PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@ aol.com
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com
Sent: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 9:27 am
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: Intercessio!



=0 A
Sortilege is not under the sphere of Iuppiter Optimus Maximus because it was not a method that was used by the augurs.  Sortilege was found in a number of temples throughout the Roman world (especially Venus nd Fortuna) but I am not sure it was ever used in a temple dedicated to IOM.  Now if the ties in the election had been decided by the auspices being taken according to the signs of heaven, the flight of raptor birds, the sound of birds, and by the quadrapeds (horses, dogs, and wolves); then IOM would have been the one to decide the election.

Please be accurate in your posts, Pontifex Maximo, because more than Dii Immortales are watching.

Fl. Galerius Aurelianus
Pontifex


-----Original Message-----
From: marcushoratius <MHoratius@hotmail. com>
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com
Sent: Tue, 9 Jun 2009 2:38 pm
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Intercessio!



M. Moravius C. Cato s. p. d.

What you said below, that either Consul could have rejected Modianus' candidacy is true. The Custodes could have, as you say, refused to certify his election by some flaw. However, neither the Consules nor the Custodes did. And if the argument is thus that by accepting Modianus as a candidate they erred, then the time to do so would have been within seventy-two hours of the Consul announcing who had been accepted as candidates. Do so after the election was already held is contrary to the law. He must give his reason for why the election process itself, and/or the certification process was flawed. The issue over Modianus' candidacy expired before voting began.

Then, too, you forget who else was involved in this process, for tie votes of the Centuriata were decided by casting lots. Sortition is a matter under the prorogative of Jupiter Optimus Maximus. In the end He is the one who really decided the results. Thus it could be argued that the Tribunus defied not only the will of the People but also the will of the Gods, who apparently did not reject Modianus' candidacy or else They might have cast the lots in your favor.

At any rate, I don't agree that we are left with only one Censor really. If the intercessio stands then there will have to be a new election held. You cannot win by default, Cato, as you gained neither a majority of the Centuriata from the votes of the People, nor by the sortition overseen by the Gods.

If asked, I shall perform an augurium on whether the Gods have indeed accepted Modianus as Censor suffectus to confirm whether They approved of the sortition. It is a matter for the Augurs to consider.

Vale et vade in Deo

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com, "Gaius Equitius Cato" <mlcinnyc@.. .> wrote:
>
> Cato Moravio Piscino sal.
>
> Salve.
>
> Vipsanius'20veto says that since the very basis upon which these results are being presented is flawed, and the basis upon which the consuls are accepting them is equally flawed, they cannot be either certified or accepted under our law. The analogy might be drawn between a manufacturer, a parts tester, and an inspector.
>
> Say a car is manufactured, and the brakes are faulty. The parts test results miss the flaw and it is passed. An inspector finds the fault in the brakes and returns the car to the manufacturer, saying that the testers were incorrect and that the car in is inherently flawed and cannot be driven. It doesn't matter if the publicity stills are in magazines already, or the ad campaign is in full swing, or even if the manufacturer has received tens of thousands of orders. If the car is flawed it cannot be driven.
>
> Certification and acceptance of the results are two more opportunities we have to protect the law of the Respublica; where they failed earlier, the tribunes can uphold the law in this instance. In fact, the custodes could have refused to certify the results on the same basis, that they are flawed by virtue of the candidate's inability to stand for the office. The consuls and praetors have the same opportunity, but it is clearly not in their interests (personal/political , that is, as following the law is demonstrably not within their concept of the well-being of the Respublica) to do so.
>
> Right now, by the virtue of the tribune' s veto in accordance with our law, we have a sole censor in office, Galerius Paulinus.
>
> Vale,
>
> Cato
>
>
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com, "marcushoratius" <MHoratius@> wrote:
> >
> > Salve Cato
> >
> > The only problem with your reasoning here is the discrepency between Agrippa's veto against the actions of magistrates and the reasoning he gave behind it. The reasoning he gave really concerned the candidacy of Modianus, based on an interpretation by Sulla, Gnaeus Caesar, and Potitius as to the meaning of "consecutive. " That was a misinterpretation IMHO. We are nearly six months into the year. The history behind the issue of electing suffecti in Nova Roma, even going back to the time when suffecti were appointed by the Senate, never considered "consecutive" in the way it has been misinterpreted by these few individuals for their own political reasons. The conflict here has nothing to do with the law. None the less...
> >
> > If the problem was in the candidacy then a Tribunus Plebis should have vetoed the candidacy before the Comitia met. That is, he could have vetoed the Consul's acceptance of the candidacy of someone he thought unqualified. That would allow other candidates to be reviewed and "certified" by the Consuls as eligible and the Tribuni given an opportunity to review the eligibility of all candidates prior to the Comitia assembl ing.
> >
> > However, Tribunus Agrippa vetoed the certification process conducted by the Custodes after the election. He gave no reason as to why he thought that process of certification was in error. Once the candidates were set, the Comitia having already concluded its voting, the issue of candidacies was over. To veto the Custodes over a candidacy is a non sequiter. So what, I would like to know, did the Tribunus see in error with the certification process itself to overthrow what the People had decided? If the Custodes found no error in the election process of the Comitia itself and therefore legally certified the results, then Agrippa's intercessio is without basis and should be withdrawn.
> >
> > Vale
> > M. Moravius Piscinus
> >
> > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com, "Gaius Equitius Cato" <mlcinnyc@> wrote:
> > >
> > > Cato Galerio Aureliano sal.
> > >
> > > Salve.
> > >
> > > Your veto is incorrect, as is most of the argument surrounding this issue. Vipsanius Agrippa has not pronounced intercessio against the right of the People to hold or vote in elections, nor did he veto the results themselves (nor could he, as neither the act of voting nor the results of an election are acts of a magistrate). He has issued a veto against the certification of the results by the custodes and the acceptance of the results b y the consuls, which *are* acts of magistrates, based on the fact that he believes the results reflect a violation of the Constitution.
> > >
> > > In point of fact a tribune *can* stop a vote or an election from happening in the first place - this is the law under Nova Roma and was actually practiced by the ancient Romans - so stopping an election or a vote on legislation is *not* un-Roman in the least. It is the assumption - and application - of current post-Enlightenment political theory that makes this seem "unfair", but the ancient Romans would have recognized it as perfectly valid.
> > >
> > > Those who beat the "be Roman, act Roman, follow the Romans" drum should understand that actual ancient Roman political practice was not really in any way democratic or "fair" by contemporary standards.
> > >
> > >
> > > Vale.
> > >
> > > Cato
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com, Robert Levee <galerius_of_ rome@> wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Salve et salvete,
> > > >
> > > > "I, Appius Galerius Aurelianus, tribune of the Plebs,
> > > >
> > > > In application of the paragraph IV.A.7b.of the Constitution of Nova Roma,
> > > >
> &g t; > > Considering the Constitution of Nova Roma and of the laws which applies it and
> > > > define the powers of the tribunes of the Plebs, especially in case of an intercessio,
> > > >
> > > > Considering the message nb 66421 issued in the Forum last Jun 7, 2009 4:32 pm by which
> > > > Tribune G. Vipsanius Agrippa has pronounced "intercessio against the custodes Marcus Lucretius Agricola and
> > > > Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus in certifying the election of Caeso Fabius Buteo
> > > > Modianus as censor and against the consuls Marcus Iulius Severus and Marcus
> > > > Cornelius Complutensis in accepting the election results",
> > > >
> > > > Considering that this intercessio violates the Constitution, and especially its
> > > > article II, B, 3,
> > > >
> > > > Hereby veto the intercession thrown by Tribune G. Vipsanius Agrippa last Jun 7, 2009 4:32 pm."
> > > >
> > > > I have quoted the article II, B, 3 of the constitution. There may be other arguments, but this one (the right of Novaromans to take part in elections) is one of the good grounds here, for a tribune should never be eager to make his own voice prevailing on the People's one.
> > > >
> > > > Vale et valete,
> > > > Ap.Galerius Aurelianus
> > > >20Tribune of the Plebs
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66599 From: PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@aol.com Date: 2009-06-10
Subject: Re: Intercessio - End of the period allotted for tribuni plebis to s
The intercessio of Agrippa was not against the election process but against the actions of the custodes and the consuls. 

You are however correct that as a Tribunus Plebis, I do not have the authority to call for a new election except through the action of the Consuls.  I appreciate you pointing this out to me in such a TIMELY MANNER, as opposed to others I could name but that would be redundant.

Fl. Galerius Aurelianus,
Tribunus Plebis


-----Original Message-----
From: Roger <politicog@...>
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 10:28 am
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Intercessio - End of the period allotted for tribuni plebis to state agreement or disagreement.




By "call for a new election", I assume that you mean you request the Consuls to call a new election within 30 days, as I do not believe the Tribunes have authority to call for elections except in the Comitia Plebis Tributa, and, in exceptional circumstances, the Comitia Populi Tributa.

I accept your other statements regarding the intercessio, but I belive the Tribunes authority can only extend to annoucing the effectiveness of the intercessio, but not to calling a new election.

While we're on the subject, had I been a Tribune, I would have disagreed with this particular intercessio (BTW, I voted for Cato, with significant reservations) . However, it seems to me that intercessio against individual candidacies cannot be placed after Contio has ended.

Lucius Quintius Constantius

- In Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com, PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@ ... wrote:
>
> > > Of the remaining four Tribunes, one has agreed with the intercessio, one has withdrawn his disagreement & thus abstained, and the remaining two have also abstained.
>
> As such, the action which was vetoed shall be allowed to take effect starting immediately.
>
> I call for a new election for Censor to begin within thirty days of this date.
>
> Valete
>
>
>
>

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66600 From: Robert Levee Date: 2009-06-10
Subject: intercessio!
Salve et salvete Fellow Nova Romans s.p.d.

It is my duty to inform you that the 72 hours allotted for the Tribunate to dispute the intercessio of Guius Vispanius Agippa has ended and I report to you that the intercessio stands.

Vale et Valete,
Ap.Galerius Aurelianus
Tribunis Plebis
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66601 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2009-06-10
Subject: Re: Intercessio - End of the period allotted for tribuni plebis to s
Cato Quintio Constantio sal.

Salve.

First, thanks for your vote :)

Second, I urge you to realize that the tribunes do have the right to veto any action of any magistrate if they believe the "letter and / or the spirit" of the Constitution is being violated.

It was called against the certification and acceptance of election results which in and of themselves are flawed because the candidacy violated both the letter and the spirit of the law and the Constitution.

Without putting words in his mouth, I think that Galerius Aurelianus was simply generally calling for an election in accordance with our law, not attempting to make a call of the comitia per se.

Again, if a piece of machinery is flawed, it does not matter when the flaw is corrected; the important thing is that it *is* corrected so that the whole machine can work properly.

Vale,

Cato

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Roger" <politicog@...> wrote:
>
>
> By "call for a new election", I assume that you mean you request the Consuls to call a new election within 30 days, as I do not believe the Tribunes have authority to call for elections except in the Comitia Plebis Tributa, and, in exceptional circumstances, the Comitia Populi Tributa.
>
> I accept your other statements regarding the intercessio, but I belive the Tribunes authority can only extend to annoucing the effectiveness of the intercessio, but not to calling a new election.
>
> While we're on the subject, had I been a Tribune, I would have disagreed with this particular intercessio (BTW, I voted for Cato, with significant reservations). However, it seems to me that intercessio against individual candidacies cannot be placed after Contio has ended.
>
> Lucius Quintius Constantius
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66602 From: M.C.C. Date: 2009-06-10
Subject: Re: Intercessio - End of the period allotted for tribuni plebis to s
M. Curiatius Complutensis Consul Tribunibus Plebis sal

I have sent in private the test of the invalidity of the veto to the tribuni, but the tribuni have preferred to break the law instead to accept a private advise.

I have quoted the law in my messages, the tribuni were advised, but they preferred to break the law.

The law is clear the intercessio is invalid. And item plus: the intercessio is invalid according the law.

Valete

COMPLVTENSIS

And now

PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@... escribió:

Fl. Galerius Aurelianus Tribunus Plebis M. Curiatius  Complutensis Consul sal.

I do not find that your post has validity since you could have raised the objection of the nomen at the time it was issued.  However, I recognize who was meant since we only have two consuls in NR.  Only the Tribunes have the authority to agree or disagree with the intercessio of one of their colleagues; or a dictator or interrex.

The Consuls do not have the authority to overturn the intercessio of a Tribunus Plebis after the end of the 72 hours.  If you do not abide by the intercessio, I shall be forced to fine you under the Lex Didia Gemina de potestate tribunica, Section III, A in the amount of thirty U.S. dollars ($30.00) paid to the treasure of Nova Roma and devoted to Ceres.  Such a penalty cannot be suspended or revoked except by intercessio of another Tribunus Plebis or a Praetorian appraisal which should permit the fined citizen further recourse at law under the Lex Salicia Iudiciaria.  The right of provocatio will be respect as Article II.B.5 of the Consitution.

Vale.


-----Original Message-----
From: M.C.C. <complutensis@ gmail.com>
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com
Sent: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 10:21 am
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Intercessio - End of the period allotted for tribuni plebis to state agreement or disagreement.



Marcus Curiatius Complutensis Consul Tribunibus Plebis omnes civibusque SPD


Tribunus Plebis Gaius Vipsanius Agrippa has pronounced intercessio in name of the following citizens: Senator Gnaeus Iulius Caesar, Senator Lucius Cornelius Sulla Felix, Quintus Valerius Poplicola, and Marcus Valerius Potitus.

This pronouncement is according with the Lex Didia Gemina de potestate tribunicia II.A.1.a

Tribunus Plebis Gaius Vipsanius Agrippa has pronounced intercessio "against custodes Marcus Lucretius Agricola and Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus and against the consuls Marcus Iulius Severus and Marcus Cornelius Complutensis" . 

In accordance with the Lex Didia Gemina de potestate tribunicia II.A.1.b the intercessio of the Tribuni must include the official name and office of the magistrate(s) against whose act or acts the intercessio or auxilium has been interposed. The intercessio is invalid because one of the consuls is not member of Gens Cornelia.

In accordance with the Lex Didia Gemina de potestate tribunicia II.A.1.c the intercessio of the Tribuni must include the article(s) of the Constitution or the leges violated by the magistrate's act(s).

In accordance with the Lex Didia Gemina de potestate tribunicia II. A.2. if the intercessio of a Tribunus Plebis does not include these three elements, the intercessio shall be invalid.

The intercessio of  the Tribuni Plebis is invalid.

Curate ut valeatis

M. Curiatius Complutensis
Consul

PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@ aol.com escribió:
Fl. Galerius Aurelianus Tribunus Plebis s.p.d.

Under the Constitution, the lex Labiena de intercessione, and the lex Didia Gemina de poteste tribunicia--

It has been 72 hours since the following intercessio was issued: 

"Tribunus Plebis Gaius Vipsanius Agrippa SPD

I pronounce intercessio against the custodes Marcus Lucretius Agricola and Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus in certifying the election of Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus as censor and against the consuls Marcus Iulius Severus and Marcus Cornelius Complutensis in accepting the election results. 

This action was requested by Senator Gnaeus Iulius Caesar, Senator Lucius Cornelius Sulla Felix, Quintus Valerius Poplicola, and Marcus Valerius Potitus.

Modianus cannot hold the office of censor. This would violate Section 1 of the Lex Cornelia Iunia de definitione intervallorum magistratuum; "no person shall hold the office of censor consecutively" with Section IV A of the constitution as the definition of the term 'office of censor'.

As the Lex Cornelia Iunia de de finitione intervallorum magistratuum does not define the term 'office of censor', the Constitution is used by virtue of Section I B, giving precedence to the constitution as the highest legal authority.

The censorship is measured in a 2 year term and cannot be subdivided. Modianus cannot hold the office consecutively.

Gaius Vipsanius Agrippa
Tribunus Plebis"

Of the remaining four Tribunes, one has agreed with the intercessio, one has withdrawn his disagreement & thus abstained, and the remaining two have also abstained.

As such, the action which was vetoed shall be allowed to take effect starting immediately.

I call for a new election for Censor to begin within thirty days of this date.

Valete



-----Original Message-----
From: PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@ aol.com
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com
Sent: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 9:33 am
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: Intercessio!



Fl. Galerius Aurelianus Tribunus Plebis.

I agree with the intercessio pronounced by Agrippa.

Valete.


-----Original Message-----
From: PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@ aol.com
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com
Sent: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 9:27 am
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: Intercessio!



=0 A
Sortilege is not under the sphere of Iuppiter Optimus Maximus because it was not a method that was used by the augurs.  Sortilege was found in a number of temples throughout the Roman world (especially Venus nd Fortuna) but I am not sure it was ever used in a temple dedicated to IOM.  Now if the ties in the election had been decided by the auspices being taken according to the signs of heaven, the flight of raptor birds, the sound of birds, and by the quadrapeds (horses, dogs, and wolves); then IOM would have been the one to decide the election.

Please be accurate in your posts, Pontifex Maximo, because more than Dii Immortales are watching.

Fl. Galerius Aurelianus
Pontifex


-----Original Message-----
From: marcushoratius <MHoratius@hotmail. com>
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com
Sent: Tue, 9 Jun 2009 2:38 pm
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Intercessio!



M. Moravius C. Cato s. p. d.

What you said below, that either Consul could have rejected Modianus' candidacy is true. The Custodes could have, as you say, refused to certify his election by some flaw. However, neither the Consules nor the Custodes did. And if the argument is thus that by accepting Modianus as a candidate they erred, then the time to do so would have been within seventy-two hours of the Consul announcing who had been accepted as candidates. Do so after the election was already held is contrary to the law. He must give his reason for why the election process itself, and/or the certification process was flawed. The issue over Modianus' candidacy expired before voting began.

Then, too, you forget who else was involved in this process, for tie votes of the Centuriata were decided by casting lots. Sortition is a matter under the prorogative of Jupiter Optimus Maximus. In the end He is the one who really decided the results. Thus it could be argued that the Tribunus defied not only the will of the People but also the will of the Gods, who apparently did not reject Modianus' candidacy or else They might have cast the lots in your favor.

At any rate, I don't agree that we are left with only one Censor really. If the intercessio stands then there will have to be a new election held. You cannot win by default, Cato, as you gained neither a majority of the Centuriata from the votes of the People, nor by the sortition overseen by the Gods.

If asked, I shall perform an augurium on whether the Gods have indeed accepted Modianus as Censor suffectus to confirm whether They approved of the sortition. It is a matter for the Augurs to consider.

Vale et vade in Deo

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com, "Gaius Equitius Cato" <mlcinnyc@.. .> wrote:
>
> Cato Moravio Piscino sal.
>
> Salve.
>
> Vipsanius'20veto says that since the very basis upon which these results are being presented is flawed, and the basis upon which the consuls are accepting them is equally flawed, they cannot be either certified or accepted under our law. The analogy might be drawn between a manufacturer, a parts tester, and an inspector.
>
> Say a car is manufactured, and the brakes are faulty. The parts test results miss the flaw and it is passed. An inspector finds the fault in the brakes and returns the car to the manufacturer, saying that the testers were incorrect and that the car in is inherently flawed and cannot be driven. It doesn't matter if the publicity stills are in magazines already, or the ad campaign is in full swing, or even if the manufacturer has received tens of thousands of orders. If the car is flawed it cannot be driven.
>
> Certification and acceptance of the results are two more opportunities we have to protect the law of the Respublica; where they failed earlier, the tribunes can uphold the law in this instance. In fact, the custodes could have refused to certify the results on the same basis, that they are flawed by virtue of the candidate's inability to stand for the office. The consuls and praetors have the same opportunity, but it is clearly not in their interests (personal/political , that is, as following the law is demonstrably not within their concept of the well-being of the Respublica) to do so.
>
> Right now, by the virtue of the tribune' s veto in accordance with our law, we have a sole censor in office, Galerius Paulinus.
>
> Vale,
>
> Cato
>
>
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com, "marcushoratius" <MHoratius@> wrote:
> >
> > Salve Cato
> >
> > The only problem with your reasoning here is the discrepency between Agrippa's veto against the actions of magistrates and the reasoning he gave behind it. The reasoning he gave really concerned the candidacy of Modianus, based on an interpretation by Sulla, Gnaeus Caesar, and Potitius as to the meaning of "consecutive. " That was a misinterpretation IMHO. We are nearly six months into the year. The history behind the issue of electing suffecti in Nova Roma, even going back to the time when suffecti were appointed by the Senate, never considered "consecutive" in the way it has been misinterpreted by these few individuals for their own political reasons. The conflict here has nothing to do with the law. None the less...
> >
> > If the problem was in the candidacy then a Tribunus Plebis should have vetoed the candidacy before the Comitia met. That is, he could have vetoed the Consul's acceptance of the candidacy of someone he thought unqualified. That would allow other candidates to be reviewed and "certified" by the Consuls as eligible and the Tribuni given an opportunity to review the eligibility of all candidates prior to the Comitia assembl ing.
> >
> > However, Tribunus Agrippa vetoed the certification process conducted by the Custodes after the election. He gave no reason as to why he thought that process of certification was in error. Once the candidates were set, the Comitia having already concluded its voting, the issue of candidacies was over. To veto the Custodes over a candidacy is a non sequiter. So what, I would like to know, did the Tribunus see in error with the certification process itself to overthrow what the People had decided? If the Custodes found no error in the election process of the Comitia itself and therefore legally certified the results, then Agrippa's intercessio is without basis and should be withdrawn.
> >
> > Vale
> > M. Moravius Piscinus
> >
> > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com, "Gaius Equitius Cato" <mlcinnyc@> wrote:
> > >
> > > Cato Galerio Aureliano sal.
> > >
> > > Salve.
> > >
> > > Your veto is incorrect, as is most of the argument surrounding this issue. Vipsanius Agrippa has not pronounced intercessio against the right of the People to hold or vote in elections, nor did he veto the results themselves (nor could he, as neither the act of voting nor the results of an election are acts of a magistrate). He has issued a veto against the certification of the results by the custodes and the acceptance of the results b y the consuls, which *are* acts of magistrates, based on the fact that he believes the results reflect a violation of the Constitution.
> > >
> > > In point of fact a tribune *can* stop a vote or an election from happening in the first place - this is the law under Nova Roma and was actually practiced by the ancient Romans - so stopping an election or a vote on legislation is *not* un-Roman in the least. It is the assumption - and application - of current post-Enlightenment political theory that makes this seem "unfair", but the ancient Romans would have recognized it as perfectly valid.
> > >
> > > Those who beat the "be Roman, act Roman, follow the Romans" drum should understand that actual ancient Roman political practice was not really in any way democratic or "fair" by contemporary standards.
> > >
> > >
> > > Vale.
> > >
> > > Cato
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com, Robert Levee <galerius_of_ rome@> wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Salve et salvete,
> > > >
> > > > "I, Appius Galerius Aurelianus, tribune of the Plebs,
> > > >
> > > > In application of the paragraph IV.A.7b.of the Constitution of Nova Roma,
> > > >
> &g t; > > Considering the Constitution of Nova Roma and of the laws which applies it and
> > > > define the powers of the tribunes of the Plebs, especially in case of an intercessio,
> > > >
> > > > Considering the message nb 66421 issued in the Forum last Jun 7, 2009 4:32 pm by which
> > > > Tribune G. Vipsanius Agrippa has pronounced "intercessio against the custodes Marcus Lucretius Agricola and
> > > > Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus in certifying the election of Caeso Fabius Buteo
> > > > Modianus as censor and against the consuls Marcus Iulius Severus and Marcus
> > > > Cornelius Complutensis in accepting the election results",
> > > >
> > > > Considering that this intercessio violates the Constitution, and especially its
> > > > article II, B, 3,
> > > >
> > > > Hereby veto the intercession thrown by Tribune G. Vipsanius Agrippa last Jun 7, 2009 4:32 pm."
> > > >
> > > > I have quoted the article II, B, 3 of the constitution. There may be other arguments, but this one (the right of Novaromans to take part in elections) is one of the good grounds here, for a tribune should never be eager to make his own voice prevailing on the People's one.
> > > >
> > > > Vale et valete,
> > > > Ap.Galerius Aurelianus
> > > >20Tribune of the Plebs
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66603 From: M.C.C. Date: 2009-06-10
Subject: Re: Intercessio - End of the period allotted for tribuni plebis to s
What are the actions of the Consuls? Please quote the message in which is included the edictum.

What are the actions of the Custodes? Please quote the message.

The tribuni have 72 hours to veto leges, edicta, etc. but the citizens have not limit time to say that your veto is invalid.

I, as plebeian citizen,  wrote you, the tribuni, to advise you that the veto is invalid, but you preferred to ignore my messages.

I have posted the message in the public ML after having found that the tribuni have ignored the law, the law that they must defend.

Valete

Curiatius Complutensis




PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@... escribió:

The intercessio of Agrippa was not against the election process but against the actions of the custodes and the consuls. 

You are however correct that as a Tribunus Plebis, I do not have the authority to call for a new election except through the action of the Consuls.  I appreciate you pointing this out to me in such a TIMELY MANNER, as opposed to others I could name but that would be redundant.

Fl. Galerius Aurelianus,
Tribunus Plebis


-----Original Message-----
From: Roger <politicog@yahoo. com>
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com
Sent: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 10:28 am
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Intercessio - End of the period allotted for tribuni plebis to state agreement or disagreement.




By "call for a new election", I assume that you mean you request the Consuls to call a new election within 30 days, as I do not believe the Tribunes have authority to call for elections except in the Comitia Plebis Tributa, and, in exceptional circumstances, the Comitia Populi Tributa.

I accept your other statements regarding the intercessio, but I belive the Tribunes authority can only extend to annoucing the effectiveness of the intercessio, but not to calling a new election.

While we're on the subject, had I been a Tribune, I would have disagreed with this particular intercessio (BTW, I voted for Cato, with significant reservations) . However, it seems to me that intercessio against individual candidacies cannot be placed after Contio has ended.

Lucius Quintius Constantius

- In Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com, PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@ ... wrote:
>
> > > Of the remaining four Tribunes, one has agreed with the intercessio, one has withdrawn his disagreement & thus abstained, and the remaining two have also abstained.
>
> As such, the action which was vetoed shall be allowed to take effect starting immediately.
>
> I call for a new election for Censor to begin within thirty days of this date.
>
> Valete
>
>
>
>

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66604 From: PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@aol.com Date: 2009-06-10
Subject: Re: Intercessio - End of the period allotted for tribuni plebis to s
It is not for the consuls to interpret the law but the Tribunes.  We, the Tribunes, have accepted the intercessio of Agrippa as legitimate.  It is now your duty and that of your colleague to accept that decision and begin the process of a new election.  Failure to accept the intercessio of the Tribunes by any citizen or magistrate will bring the consequence of the Summa Coercendi Potestas and, if necessary, the Potestas Sacrosancta down upon the head of the offender.

Fiat, fiat, fiat lux.

Fl. Galerius Aurelianus
Tribunus Plebis
flamen Cerealis


-----Original Message-----
From: M.C.C. <complutensis@...>
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 10:58 am
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Intercessio - End of the period allotted for tribuni plebis to state agreement or disagreement.



M. Curiatius Complutensis Consul Tribunibus Plebis sal

I have sent in private the test of the invalidity of the veto to the tribuni, but the tribuni have preferred to break the law instead to accept a private advise.

I have quoted the law in my messages, the tribuni were advised, but they preferred to break the law .

The law is clear the intercessio is invalid. And item plus: the intercessio is invalid according the law.

Valete

COMPLVTENSIS

And now

PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@ aol.com escribió:
Fl. Galerius Aurelianus Tribunus Plebis M. Curiatius  Complutensis Consul sal.

I do not find that your post has validity since you could have raised the objection of the nomen at the time it was issued.  However, I recognize who was meant since we only have two consuls in NR.  Only the Tribunes have the authority to agree or disagree with the intercessio of one of their colleagues; or a dictator or interrex.

The Consuls do not have the authority to overturn the intercessio of a Tribunus Plebis after the end of the 72 hours.  If you do not abide by the intercessio, I shall be forced to fine you under the Lex Didia Gemina de potestate tribunica, Section III, A in the amount of thirty U.S. dollars ($30.00) paid to the treasure of Nova Roma and devoted to Ceres.  Such a penalty cannot be suspended or revoked except by intercessio of another Tribunus Plebis or a Praetorian appraisal which should permit the fined citizen further recourse at law under the Lex Salicia Iudiciaria.  The right of provocatio will be respect as Article II.B.5 of the Consitution.

Vale.


-----Original Message-----
From: M.C.C. <com plutensis@ gmail.com>
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com
Sent: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 10:21 am
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Intercessio - End of the period allotted for tribuni plebis to state agreement or disagreement.



Marcus Curiatius Complutensis Consul Tribunibus Plebis omnes civibusque SPD


Tribunus Plebis Gaius Vipsanius Agrippa has pronounced intercessio in name of the following citizens: Senator Gnaeus Iulius Caesar, Senator Lucius Cornelius Sulla Felix, Quintus Valerius Poplicola, and Marcus Valerius Potitus.

This pronouncement is according with the Lex Didia Gemina de potestate tribunicia II.A.1.a

Tribunus Plebis Gaius Vipsanius Agrippa has pronounced intercessio "against custodes Marcus Lucretius Agricola and Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus and against the consuls Marcus Iulius Severus and Marcus Cornelius Complutensis" . 

In accordance with the Lex Didia Gemina de potestate tribunicia II.A.1.b the intercessio of the Tribuni must include the official name and office of the magistrate(s) against whose act or acts the intercessio or auxilium has been interposed. The intercessio is invalid because one of the consuls is not member of Gens Cornelia.

In accordance with the Lex Didia Gemina de potestate tribunicia II.A.1.c the interce ssio of the Tribuni must include the article(s) of the Constitution or the leges violated by the magistrate's act(s).

In accordance with the Lex Didia Gemina de potestate tribunicia II. A.2. if the intercessio of a Tribunus Plebis does not include these three elements, the intercessio shall be invalid.

The intercessio of  the Tribuni Plebis is invalid.

Curate ut valeatis

M. Curiatius Complutensis
Consul

PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@ aol.com escribió:
Fl. Galerius Aurelianus Tribunus Plebis s.p.d.

Under the Constitution, the lex Labiena de intercessione, and the lex Didia Gemina de poteste tribunicia--

It has been 72 hours since the following intercessio was issued: 

"Tribunus Plebis Gaius Vipsanius Agrippa SPD

I pronounce intercessio against the custodes Marcus Lucretius Agricola and Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus in certifying the election of Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus as censor and against the consuls Marcus Iulius Severus and Marcus Cornelius Complutensis in accepting the election results. 

This action was requested by Senator Gnaeus Iulius Caesar, Senator Lucius Cornelius Sulla Felix, Quintus Valerius Poplicola, and Marcus Valerius Potitus.

Modianus cannot hold the office of censor. This would violate Section 1 of the Lex Cornelia Iunia de definitione intervallorum magistrat uum; "no person shall hold the office of censor consecutively" with Section IV A of the constitution as the definition of the term 'office of censor'.

As the Lex Cornelia Iunia de de finitione intervallorum magistratuum does not define the term 'office of censor', the Constitution is used by virtue of Section I B, giving precedence to the constitution as the highest legal authority.

The censorship is measured in a 2 year term and cannot be subdivided. Modianus cannot hold the office consecutively.

Gaius Vipsanius Agrippa
Tribunus Plebis"

Of the remaining four Tribunes, one has agreed with the intercessio, one has withdrawn his disagreement & thus abstained, and the remaining two have also abstained.

As such, the action which was vetoed shall be allowed to take effect starting immediately.

I call for a new election for Censor to begin within thirty days of this date.

Valete



-----Original Message-----
From: PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@ aol.com
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com
Sent: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 9:33 am
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: Intercessio!



Fl. Galerius Aurelianus Tribunus Plebis.

I agree with the intercessio pronounced by Agrippa.

Valete.


-----Original Message-----
From: PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@ aol.com
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com
Sent: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 9: 27 am
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: Intercessio!



=0 A
Sortilege is not under the sphere of Iuppiter Optimus Maximus because it was not a method that was used by the augurs.  Sortilege was found in a number of temples throughout the Roman world (especially Venus nd Fortuna) but I am not sure it was ever used in a temple dedicated to IOM.  Now if the ties in the election had been decided by the auspices being taken according to the signs of heaven, the flight of raptor birds, the sound of birds, and by the quadrapeds (horses, dogs, and wolves); then IOM would have been the one to decide the election.

Please be accurate in your posts, Pontifex Maximo, because more than Dii Immortales are watching.

Fl. Galerius Aurelianus
Pontifex


-----Original Message-----
From: marcushoratius <MHoratius@hotmail. com>
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com
Sent: Tue, 9 Jun 2009 2:38 pm
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Intercessio!



M. Moravius C. Cato s. p. d.

What you said below, that either Consul could have rejected Modianus' candidacy is true. The Custodes could have, as you say, refused to certify his election by some flaw. However, neither the Consules nor the Custode s did. And if the argument is thus that by accepting Modianus as a candidate they erred, then the time to do so would have been within seventy-two hours of the Consul announcing who had been accepted as candidates. Do so after the election was already held is contrary to the law. He must give his reason for why the election process itself, and/or the certification process was flawed. The issue over Modianus' candidacy expired before voting began.

Then, too, you forget who else was involved in this process, for tie votes of the Centuriata were decided by casting lots. Sortition is a matter under the prorogative of Jupiter Optimus Maximus. In the end He is the one who really decided the results. Thus it could be argued that the Tribunus defied not only the will of the People but also the will of the Gods, who apparently did not reject Modianus' candidacy or else They might have cast the lots in your favor.

At any rate, I don't agree that we are left with only one Censor really. If the intercessio stands then there will have to be a new election held. You cannot win by default, Cato, as you gained neither a majority of the Centuriata from the votes of the People, nor by the sortition overseen by the Gods.

If asked, I shall perform an augurium on whether the Gods have indeed accepted Modianus as Censor suffectus to confirm whether They approved of the sortition. It is a matter for the Augurs to consider.

Vale et vade in Deo

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com, "Gaius Equitius Cato" <mlcinnyc@.. .> wrote:
>
> Cato Moravio Piscino sal.
>
> Salve.
>
> Vipsanius'20veto says that since the very basis upon which these results are being presented is flawed, and the basis upon which the consuls are accepting them is equally flawed, they cannot be either certified or accepted under our law. The analogy might be drawn between a manufacturer, a parts tester, and an inspector.
>
> Say a car is manufactured, and the brakes are faulty. The parts test results miss the flaw and it is passed. An inspector finds the fault in the brakes and returns the car to the manufacturer, saying that the testers were incorrect and that the car in is inherently flawed and cannot be driven. It doesn't matter if the publicity stills are in magazines already, or the ad campaign is in full swing, or even if the manufacturer has received tens of thousands of orders. If the car is flawed it cannot be driven.
>
> Certification and acceptance of the results are two more opportunities we have to protect the law of the Respublica; where they failed earlier, the tribunes can uphold the law in this instance. In fact, the custodes could have refused to certify the results on the same basis, that they are flawed by virtue of the candidate's inability to stand for the office. The consuls and praetors have the same opportunity, but it is clearly not in their interests (personal/political , that is, as following the law is demonstrably not within their concept of the well-being of the Respublica) to do so.
>
> Right now, by the virtue of the tribune' s veto in accordance with our law, we have a sole censor in office, Galerius Paulinus.
>
> Vale,
>
> Cato
>
>
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com, "marcushoratius" <MHoratius@> wrote:
> >
> > Salve Cato
> >
> > The only problem with your reasoning here is the discrepency between Agrippa's veto against the actions of magistrates and the reasoning he gave behind it. The reasoning he gave really concerned the candidacy of Modianus, based on an interpretation by Sulla, Gnaeus Caesar, and Potitius as to the meaning of "consecutive. " That was a misinterpretation IMHO. We are nearly six months into the year. The history behind the issue of electing suffecti in Nova Roma, even going back to the time when suffecti were appointed by the Senate, never considered "consecutive" in the way it has been misinterpreted by these few individuals for their own political reasons. The conflict here has nothing to do with the law. None the less...
> >
> > If the problem was in the candidacy then a Tribunus Plebis should have vetoed the candidacy before the Comitia met. That is, he could have vetoed the Consul's acceptance of the candidacy of someone he thought unquali fied. That would allow other candidates to be reviewed and "certified" by the Consuls as eligible and the Tribuni given an opportunity to review the eligibility of all candidates prior to the Comitia assembl ing.
> >
> > However, Tribunus Agrippa vetoed the certification process conducted by the Custodes after the election. He gave no reason as to why he thought that process of certification was in error. Once the candidates were set, the Comitia having already concluded its voting, the issue of candidacies was over. To veto the Custodes over a candidacy is a non sequiter. So what, I would like to know, did the Tribunus see in error with the certification process itself to overthrow what the People had decided? If the Custodes found no error in the election process of the Comitia itself and therefore legally certified the results, then Agrippa's intercessio is without basis and should be withdrawn.
> >
> > Vale
> > M. Moravius Piscinus
> >
> > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com, "Gaius Equitius Cato" <mlcinnyc@> wrote:
> > >
> > > Cato Galerio Aureliano sal.
> > >
> > > Salve.
> > >
> > > Your veto is incorrect, as is most of the argument surrounding this issue. Vipsanius Agrippa has not pronounced intercessio against the right of the People to hold or vote in elections, nor did he veto the results themselves (nor could he,20as neither the act of voting nor the results of an election are acts of a magistrate). He has issued a veto against the certification of the results by the custodes and the acceptance of the results b y the consuls, which *are* acts of magistrates, based on the fact that he believes the results reflect a violation of the Constitution.
> > >
> > > In point of fact a tribune *can* stop a vote or an election from happening in the first place - this is the law under Nova Roma and was actually practiced by the ancient Romans - so stopping an election or a vote on legislation is *not* un-Roman in the least. It is the assumption - and application - of current post-Enlightenment political theory that makes this seem "unfair", but the ancient Romans would have recognized it as perfectly valid.
> > >
> > > Those who beat the "be Roman, act Roman, follow the Romans" drum should understand that actual ancient Roman political practice was not really in any way democratic or "fair" by contemporary standards.
> > >
> > >
> > > Vale.
> > >
> > > Cato
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com, Robert Levee <galerius_of_ rome@> wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Salve et salvete,
> > > >
> > > > "I , Appius Galerius Aurelianus, tribune of the Plebs,
> > > >
> > > > In application of the paragraph IV.A.7b.of the Constitution of Nova Roma,
> > > >
> &g t; > > Considering the Constitution of Nova Roma and of the laws which applies it and
> > > > define the powers of the tribunes of the Plebs, especially in case of an intercessio,
> > > >
> > > > Considering the message nb 66421 issued in the Forum last Jun 7, 2009 4:32 pm by which
> > > > Tribune G. Vipsanius Agrippa has pronounced "intercessio against the custodes Marcus Lucretius Agricola and
> > > > Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus in certifying the election of Caeso Fabius Buteo
> > > > Modianus as censor and against the consuls Marcus Iulius Severus and Marcus
> > > > Cornelius Complutensis in accepting the election results",
> > > >
> > > > Considering that this intercessio violates the Constitution, and especially its
> > > > article II, B, 3,
> > > >
> > > > Hereby veto the intercession thrown by Tribune G. Vipsanius Agrippa last Jun 7, 2009 4:32 pm."
> > > >
> > > > I have quoted the article II, B, 3 of the constitution. There may be other arguments, but this one (the right of Novaromans to take part in elections) is one of the good grounds here, for a tribun e should never be eager to make his own voice prevailing on the People's one.
> > > >
> > > > Vale et valete,
> > > > Ap.Galerius Aurelianus
> > > >20Tribune of the Plebs
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66605 From: marcushoratius Date: 2009-06-10
Subject: Re: Intercessio!
M. Moravius Pont. Max. Fl. Galerio Pont. s. p. d.

The question is not whether the augures employed sortilege as they only oversaw that procedures followed augural law. Sortilege was used to detemine the centuria prerogativa. Sortilege was used to assign provincia to magistrates, and Jupiter Optimus Maximus was called upon in both instances. The convening magistrate would conduct the one and the Senate conducting the procedure between magistrate's provinciae. Augures were present in both cases to see that everything was done properly, even if they were not the ones who cast the lots. And of course you do realize that these sortitions were conducted in the templum of the Capitolium under the guidence of Jupiter Optimus Maximus and the Di Capitolini.

With elections, I am sure that you are also aware that the results could be voided if it was determined by the augures that any part of the procedure was vitiated. There are examples of such things cited by Livy, Valerius Maximus, and so forth. Sortition may not have been used in Roma antiqua to break ties in the centuriata, but sortition was used for selecting the one centuriata to vote first, and it was regarded as an auspicium. In the one case when the centuria prorogativa was selected by lot and and it was found to be the same centuria that had been selected when the consuls were elected who led the Roman army to defeat on the Allia, the Consul halted the election. And as sortition is used in our own election procedures, and those procedures include calling upon Jupiter Optimus Maximus, then the augural aspects of our elections also come under the review of the Augures, including the use and method employed for sortilege.



--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@... wrote:
>
> Sortilege is not under the sphere of Iuppiter Optimus Maximus because it was not a method that was used by the augurs.? Sortilege was found in a number of temples throughout the Roman world (especially Venus nd Fortuna)?but I am not sure it was ever used in a temple dedicated to IOM.? Now if the ties in the election had been decided by the auspices being taken according to the signs of heaven, the flight of raptor birds, the sound of birds, and by the quadrapeds (horses, dogs, and wolves); then IOM would have been the one to decide the election.
>
> Please be accurate in your posts, Pontifex Maximo, because more than Dii Immortales are watching.
>
> Fl. Galerius Aurelianus
> Pontifex
>
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66606 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2009-06-10
Subject: Re: Intercessio!
Cato Moravio Piscino sal.

Salve.

Interestingly, regarding the drawing of lots:

"This sort of divining, however, has now been discarded by general usage. The beauty and age of the temple still preserve the name of the lots of Praeneste — that is, among the common people, for no magistrate and no man of any reputation ever consults them; but in all other places lots have gone entirely out of use. And this explains the remark which, according to Clitomachus, Carneades used to make that he had at no other place seen Fortune more fortunate than at Praeneste. Then let us dismiss this branch of divination." - Cicero, On Divination 2.41.86-87

Valete,

Cato
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66607 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2009-06-10
Subject: Re: Intercessio - End of the period allotted for tribuni plebis to s
Cato Galerio Aureliano sal.

Salve.

Actually, under the lex Arminia Equitia de imperio, the consuls are given the power to interpret the law; they have "full iurisdictio, the power to interpret the law, on all levels on all Nova Roma subjects." (lex Arm. de imp. 2.E)

However, they may not interfere with the tribunes' right to pronounce intercessio, as follows:

"The holder of Tribunicia Potestas is not subject to any Potestas or Imperium when acting ex officio within his Tribunicia Potestas." (op.cit.3.B)

So consular imperium has no effect whatsoever on a tribune's intercessio.

Vale,

Cato



--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@... wrote:
>
> It is not for the consuls to interpret the law but the Tribunes.  We, the Tribunes, have accepted the intercessio of Agrippa as legitimate.  It is now your duty and that of your colleague to accept that decision and begin the process of a new election.  Failure to accept the intercessio of the Tribunes by any citizen or magistrate will bring the consequence of the Summa Coercendi Potestas and, if necessary, the Potestas Sacrosancta down upon the head of the offender.
>
> Fiat, fiat, fiat lux.
>
> Fl. Galerius Aurelianus
> Tribunus Plebis
> flamen Cerealis
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: M.C.C. <complutensis@...>
> To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 10:58 am
> Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Intercessio - End of the period allotted for tribuni plebis to state agreement or disagreement.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> M. Curiatius Complutensis Consul Tribunibus Plebis sal
>
> I have sent in private the test of the invalidity of the veto to the tribuni, but the tribuni have preferred to break the law instead to accept a private advise.
>
> I have quoted the law in my messages, the tribuni were advised, but they preferred to break the law.
>
> The law is clear the intercessio is invalid. And item plus: the intercessio is invalid according the law.
>
> Valete
>
> COMPLVTENSIS
>
> And now
>
> PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@... escribió:
>
>
>
> Fl. Galerius Aurelianus Tribunus Plebis M. Curiatius  Complutensis Consul sal.
>
> I do not find that your post has validity since you could have raised the objection of the nomen at the time20it was issued.  However, I recognize who was meant since we only have two consuls in NR.  Only the Tribunes have the authority to agree or disagree with the intercessio of one of their colleagues; or a dictator or interrex.
>
> The Consuls do not have the authority to overturn the intercessio of a Tribunus Plebis after the end of the 72 hours.  If you do not abide by the intercessio, I shall be forced to fine you under the Lex Didia Gemina de potestate tribunica, Section III, A in the amount of thirty U.S. dollars ($30.00) paid to the treasure of Nova Roma and devoted to Ceres.  Such a penalty cannot be suspended or revoked except by intercessio of another Tribunus Plebis or a Praetorian appraisal which should permit the fined citizen further recourse at law under the Lex Salicia Iudiciaria.  The right of provocatio will be respect as Article II.B.5 of the Consitution.
>
> Vale.
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: M.C.C. <complutensis@...>
> To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 10:21 am
> Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Intercessio - End of the period allotted for tribuni plebis to state agreement or disagreement.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Marcus Curiatius Complutensis Consul Tribunibus Plebis omnes civibusque SPD
>
>
> Tribunus Plebis Gaius Vipsanius Agrippa has pronounced intercessio in name of the following citizens: Senator Gnaeus Iulius Caesar, Senator Lucius Cornelius Sulla Felix, Quintus Valerius Poplicola, and Marcus Valerius Potitus.
>
> This pronouncement is according with the Lex Didia Gemina de p
> otestate tribunicia II.A.1.a
>
> Tribunus Plebis Gaius Vipsanius Agrippa has pronounced intercessio "against custodes Marcus Lucretius Agricola and Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus and against the consuls Marcus Iulius Severus and Marcus Cornelius Complutensis". 
>
> In accordance with the Lex Didia Gemina de potestate tribunicia II.A.1.b the intercessio of the Tribuni must include the official name and office of the magistrate(s) against whose act or acts the intercessio or auxilium has been interposed. The intercessio is invalid because one of the consuls is not member of Gens Cornelia.
>
> In accordance with the Lex Didia Gemina de potestate tribunicia II.A.1.c the intercessio of the Tribuni must include the article(s) of the Constitution or the leges violated by the magistrate's act(s).
>
> In accordance with the Lex Didia Gemina de potestate tribunicia II. A.2. if the intercessio of a Tribunus Plebis does not include these three elements, the intercessio shall be invalid.
>
> The intercessio of  the Tribuni Plebis is invalid.
>
> Curate ut valeatis
>
> M. Curiatius Complutensis
> Consul
>
> PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@... escribió:
>
>
> Fl. Galerius Aurelianus Tribunus Plebis s.p.d.
>
> Under the Constitution, the lex Labiena de intercessione, and the lex Didia Gemina de poteste tribunicia--
>
> It has been 72 hours since the following intercessio was issued: 
>
> "Tribunus Plebis Gaius Vipsanius Agrippa SPD
>
> I pronounce intercessio against the custodes Marcus Lucretius Agricola and Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus in certifying the election of Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus
> as censor and against the consuls Marcus Iulius Severus and Marcus Cornelius Complutensis in accepting the election results. 
>
> This action was requested by Senator Gnaeus Iulius Caesar, Senator Lucius Cornelius Sulla Felix, Quintus Valerius Poplicola, and Marcus Valerius Potitus.
>
> Modianus cannot hold the office of censor. This would violate Section 1 of the Lex Cornelia Iunia de definitione intervallorum magistratuum; "no person shall hold the office of censor consecutively" with Section IV A of the constitution as the definition of the term 'office of censor'.
>
> As the Lex Cornelia Iunia de de finitione intervallorum magistratuum does not define the term 'office of censor', the Constitution is used by virtue of Section I B, giving precedence to the constitution as the highest legal authority.
>
> The censorship is measured in a 2 year term and cannot be subdivided. Modianus cannot hold the office consecutively.
>
> Gaius Vipsanius Agrippa
> Tribunus Plebis"
>
> Of the remaining four Tribunes, one has agreed with the intercessio, one has withdrawn his disagreement & thus abstained, and the remaining two have also abstained.
>
> As such, the action which was vetoed shall be allowed to take effect starting immediately.
>
> I call for a new election for Censor to begin within thirty days of this date.
>
> Valete
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@...
> To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 9:33 am
> Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: Intercessio!
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Fl. Galerius Aurelianus Tribunus Plebis.
>
> I agree=2
> 0with the intercessio pronounced by Agrippa.
>
> Valete.
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@...
> To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 9:27 am
> Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: Intercessio!
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> =0 A
> Sortilege is not under the sphere of Iuppiter Optimus Maximus because it was not a method that was used by the augurs.  Sortilege was found in a number of temples throughout the Roman world (especially Venus nd Fortuna) but I am not sure it was ever used in a temple dedicated to IOM.  Now if the ties in the election had been decided by the auspices being taken according to the signs of heaven, the flight of raptor birds, the sound of birds, and by the quadrapeds (horses, dogs, and wolves); then IOM would have been the one to decide the election.
>
> Please be accurate in your posts, Pontifex Maximo, because more than Dii Immortales are watching.
>
> Fl. Galerius Aurelianus
> Pontifex
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: marcushoratius <MHoratius@...>
> To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Tue, 9 Jun 2009 2:38 pm
> Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Intercessio!
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> M. Moravius C. Cato s. p. d.
>
> What you said below, that either Consul could have rejected Modianus' candidacy is true. The Custodes could have, as you say, refused to certify his election by some flaw. However, neither the Consules nor the Custodes did. And if the argument is thus that by accepting Modianus as a candidate they erred, then the time to do so would have been within seventy-two hours of the Co
> nsul announcing who had been accepted as candidates. Do so after the election was already held is contrary to the law. He must give his reason for why the election process itself, and/or the certification process was flawed. The issue over Modianus' candidacy expired before voting began.
>
> Then, too, you forget who else was involved in this process, for tie votes of the Centuriata were decided by casting lots. Sortition is a matter under the prorogative of Jupiter Optimus Maximus. In the end He is the one who really decided the results. Thus it could be argued that the Tribunus defied not only the will of the People but also the will of the Gods, who apparently did not reject Modianus' candidacy or else They might have cast the lots in your favor.
>
> At any rate, I don't agree that we are left with only one Censor really. If the intercessio stands then there will have to be a new election held. You cannot win by default, Cato, as you gained neither a majority of the Centuriata from the votes of the People, nor by the sortition overseen by the Gods.
>
> If asked, I shall perform an augurium on whether the Gods have indeed accepted Modianus as Censor suffectus to confirm whether They approved of the sortition. It is a matter for the Augurs to consider.
>
> Vale et vade in Deo
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Gaius Equitius Cato" <mlcinnyc@> wrote:
> >
> > Cato Moravio Piscino sal.
> >
> > Salve.
> >
> > Vipsanius'20veto says that since the very basis upon which these results are being presen
> ted is flawed, and the basis upon which the consuls are accepting them is equally flawed, they cannot be either certified or accepted under our law. The analogy might be drawn between a manufacturer, a parts tester, and an inspector.
> >
> > Say a car is manufactured, and the brakes are faulty. The parts test results miss the flaw and it is passed. An inspector finds the fault in the brakes and returns the car to the manufacturer, saying that the testers were incorrect and that the car in is inherently flawed and cannot be driven. It doesn't matter if the publicity stills are in magazines already, or the ad campaign is in full swing, or even if the manufacturer has received tens of thousands of orders. If the car is flawed it cannot be driven.
> >
> > Certification and acceptance of the results are two more opportunities we have to protect the law of the Respublica; where they failed earlier, the tribunes can uphold the law in this instance. In fact, the custodes could have refused to certify the results on the same basis, that they are flawed by virtue of the candidate's inability to stand for the office. The consuls and praetors have the same opportunity, but it is clearly not in their interests (personal/political, that is, as following the law is demonstrably not within their concept of the well-being of the Respublica) to do so.
> >
> > Right now, by the virtue of the tribune' s veto in accordance with our law, we have a sole censor in office, Galerius Paulinus.
> >
> > Vale,
> >
> >
> Cato
> >
> >
> >
> > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "marcushoratius" <MHoratius@> wrote:
> > >
> > > Salve Cato
> > >
> > > The only problem with your reasoning here is the discrepency between Agrippa's veto against the actions of magistrates and the reasoning he gave behind it. The reasoning he gave really concerned the candidacy of Modianus, based on an interpretation by Sulla, Gnaeus Caesar, and Potitius as to the meaning of "consecutive." That was a misinterpretation IMHO. We are nearly six months into the year. The history behind the issue of electing suffecti in Nova Roma, even going back to the time when suffecti were appointed by the Senate, never considered "consecutive" in the way it has been misinterpreted by these few individuals for their own political reasons. The conflict here has nothing to do with the law. None the less...
> > >
> > > If the problem was in the candidacy then a Tribunus Plebis should have vetoed the candidacy before the Comitia met. That is, he could have vetoed the Consul's acceptance of the candidacy of someone he thought unqualified. That would allow other candidates to be reviewed and "certified" by the Consuls as eligible and the Tribuni given an opportunity to review the eligibility of all candidates prior to the Comitia assembl ing.
> > >
> > > However, Tribunus Agrippa vetoed the certification process conducted by the Custodes after the election. He gave no reason as to why he thought that process of certification was in error. Once the candidates were set, the Comitia h
> aving already concluded its voting, the issue of candidacies was over. To veto the Custodes over a candidacy is a non sequiter. So what, I would like to know, did the Tribunus see in error with the certification process itself to overthrow what the People had decided? If the Custodes found no error in the election process of the Comitia itself and therefore legally certified the results, then Agrippa's intercessio is without basis and should be withdrawn.
> > >
> > > Vale
> > > M. Moravius Piscinus
> > >
> > > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Gaius Equitius Cato" <mlcinnyc@> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Cato Galerio Aureliano sal.
> > > >
> > > > Salve.
> > > >
> > > > Your veto is incorrect, as is most of the argument surrounding this issue. Vipsanius Agrippa has not pronounced intercessio against the right of the People to hold or vote in elections, nor did he veto the results themselves (nor could he, as neither the act of voting nor the results of an election are acts of a magistrate). He has issued a veto against the certification of the results by the custodes and the acceptance of the results b y the consuls, which *are* acts of magistrates, based on the fact that he believes the results reflect a violation of the Constitution.
> > > >
> > > > In point of fact a tribune *can* stop a vote or an election from happening in the first place - this is the law under Nova Roma and was actually practiced by the ancient Romans - so stopping an election or a vote on legislation is *not*
> un-Roman in the least. It is the assumption - and application - of current post-Enlightenment political theory that makes this seem "unfair", but the ancient Romans would have recognized it as perfectly valid.
> > > >
> > > > Those who beat the "be Roman, act Roman, follow the Romans" drum should understand that actual ancient Roman political practice was not really in any way democratic or "fair" by contemporary standards.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Vale.
> > > >
> > > > Cato
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Robert Levee <galerius_of_rome@> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Salve et salvete,
> > > > >
> > > > > "I, Appius Galerius Aurelianus, tribune of the Plebs,
> > > > >
> > > > > In application of the paragraph IV.A.7b.of the Constitution of Nova Roma,
> > > > >
> > &g t; > > Considering the Constitution of Nova Roma and of the laws which applies it and
> > > > > define the powers of the tribunes of the Plebs, especially in case of an intercessio,
> > > > >
> > > > > Considering the message nb 66421 issued in the Forum last Jun 7, 2009 4:32 pm by which
> > > > > Tribune G. Vipsanius Agrippa has pronounced "intercessio against the custodes Marcus Lucretius Agricola and
> > > > > Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus in certifying the election of Caeso Fabius Buteo
> > > > > Modianus as censor and against the consuls Marcus Iulius Severus and Marcus
> > > > > Cornelius Complutensis in accepting the election results",
> > > > >
> > >=2
> 0> > Considering that this intercessio violates the Constitution, and especially its
> > > > > article II, B, 3,
> > > > >
> > > > > Hereby veto the intercession thrown by Tribune G. Vipsanius Agrippa last Jun 7, 2009 4:32 pm."
> > > > >
> > > > > I have quoted the article II, B, 3 of the constitution. There may be other arguments, but this one (the right of Novaromans to take part in elections) is one of the good grounds here, for a tribune should never be eager to make his own voice prevailing on the People's one.
> > > > >
> > > > > Vale et valete,
> > > > > Ap.Galerius Aurelianus
> > > > >20Tribune of the Plebs
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Dell Inspiron 15 Laptop: Now in 6 vibrant colors! Shop Dell's full line of laptops.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Dell Inspiron 15 Laptop: Now in 6 vibrant colors! Shop Dell's full line of laptops.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Dell Inspiron 15 Laptop: Now in 6 vibrant colors! Shop Dell's full lin e of laptops.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Dell Inspiron 15 Laptop: Now in 6 vibrant colors! Shop Dell's full line of laptops.
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66608 From: politicog Date: 2009-06-10
Subject: Re: Intercessio - End of the period allotted for tribuni plebis to s
--- On Wed, 6/10/09, Gaius Equitius Cato <mlcinnyc@...> wrote:

> From: Gaius Equitius Cato <mlcinnyc@...>
> Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Intercessio - End of the period allotted for tribuni plebis to state agreeme
> To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> Date: Wednesday, June 10, 2009, 11:54 AM
> Cato Quintio Constantio sal.
>
> Salve.
>
> First, thanks for your vote  :)

You're welcome. Don't get too big a head, I said it was with considerable reservations.


>
> Second, I urge you to realize that the tribunes do have the
> right to veto any action of any magistrate if they believe
> the "letter and / or the spirit" of the Constitution is
> being violated.

I realize that. That's not the point.

>
> It was called against the certification and acceptance of
> election results which in and of themselves are flawed
> because the candidacy violated both the letter and the
> spirit of the law and the Constitution.

Here's where the issue arises. The Tribunes do exercise the right to intercessio. But that intercessio, according to the Constitution, "the issuance and function of intercessio shall be defined according to procedures described by legislation passed by Comitia."

The lex Fabia de ratione comitorum centuriatorum provides that intercessio may be pronounced an entire election or vote, or one or more individual items on the ballot. It allows this during Contio, implying that such action is not allowed after Contio has closed. The Tribunes were called on to pronounce on the legality of the candidacy during Contio, they chose not to.

Having said that, do I accept this as a legal intercessio? Yes, the time limit has expired for Tribunes to pronounce their acceptance or disagreement, and it has been accepted. If the objection is to legality of Modianius holding the office, the better course of action would be an intercessio against Modianius as a magistrate, rather than attempting to overturn the election results.

In case, I find it doubtful that there will be any resolution of this issue without a new election, or some sort of judicial procedure. If Modianius remains, I think the Censors will veto each other ad nauseum, leading to complete inaction.

BTW, I also sent a request for intercessio to one of the Tribunes, asking intercessio against Paulinus' decision to withhold Censor's tool from Modianius, however, that got no response.
>
> Without putting words in his mouth, I think that Galerius
> Aurelianus was simply generally calling for an election in
> accordance with our law, not attempting to make a call of
> the comitia per se.

I wanted to be clear on what he was asking.

Lucius Quintius Constantius
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66609 From: Maior Date: 2009-06-10
Subject: Re: Intercessio!
M. Hortensia Fl. Galerio spd;
I will be more than happy to foward an article and book review concerning sortition in the Republic. It is considered an auspice. I will be reading in its entirety "Public Office in Early Rome" by Roberta Stewart, you can leaf through it via Google books.

I wrote to Cordus about this historical matter, he said the last possible time for a tribunian veto was after the sors for the perogativa had been called.
bene vale
M. Hortensia Maior
>
> Sortilege is not under the sphere of Iuppiter Optimus Maximus because it was not a method that was used by the augurs.? Sortilege was found in a number of temples throughout the Roman world (especially Venus nd Fortuna)?but I am not sure it was ever used in a temple dedicated to IOM.? Now if the ties in the election had been decided by the auspices being taken according to the signs of heaven, the flight of raptor birds, the sound of birds, and by the quadrapeds (horses, dogs, and wolves); then IOM would have been the one to decide the election.
>
> Please be accurate in your posts, Pontifex Maximo, because more than Dii Immortales are watching.
>
> Fl. Galerius Aurelianus
> Pontifex
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: marcushoratius <MHoratius@...>
> To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Tue, 9 Jun 2009 2:38 pm
> Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Intercessio!
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> M. Moravius C. Cato s. p. d.
>
> What you said below, that either Consul could have rejected Modianus' candidacy is true. The Custodes could have, as you say, refused to certify his election by some flaw. However, neither the Consules nor the Custodes did. And if the argument is thus that by accepting Modianus as a candidate they erred, then the time to do so would have been within seventy-two hours of the Consul announcing who had been accepted as candidates. Do so after the election was already held is contrary to the law. He must give his reason for why the election process itself, and/or the certification process was flawed. The issue over Modianus' candidacy expired before voting began.
>
> Then, too, you forget who else was involved in this process, for tie votes of the Centuriata were decided by casting lots. Sortition is a matter under the prorogative of Jupiter Optimus Maximus. In the end He is the one who really decided the results. Thus it could be argued that the Tribunus defied not only the will of the People but also the will of the Gods, who apparently did not reject Modianus' candidacy or else They might have cast the lots in your favor.
>
> At any rate, I don't agree that we are left with only one Censor really. If the intercessio stands then there will have to be a new election held. You cannot win by default, Cato, as you gained neither a majority of the Centuriata from the votes of the People, nor by the sortition overseen by the Gods.
>
> If asked, I shall perform an augurium on whether the Gods have indeed accepted Modianus as Censor suffectus to confirm whether They approved of the sortition. It is a matter for the Augurs to consider.
>
> Vale et vade in Deo
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Gaius Equitius Cato" <mlcinnyc@> wrote:
> >
> > Cato Moravio Piscino sal.
> >
> > Salve.
> >
> > Vipsanius' veto says that since the very basis upon which these results are being presented is flawed, and the basis upon which the consuls are accepting them is equally flawed, they cannot be either certified or accepted under our law. The analogy might be drawn between a manufacturer, a parts tester, and an inspector.
> >
> > Say a car is manufactured, and the brakes are faulty. The parts test results miss the flaw and it is passed. An inspector finds the fault in the brakes and returns the car to the manufacturer, saying that the testers were incorrect and that the car in is inherently flawed and cannot be driven. It doesn't matter if the publicity stills are in magazines already, or the ad campaign is in full swing, or even if the manufacturer has received tens of thousands of orders. If the car is flawed it cannot be driven.
> >
> > Certification and acceptance of the results are two more opportunities we have to protect the law of the Respublica; where they failed earlier, the tribunes can uphold the law in this instance. In fact, the custodes could have refused to certify the results on the same basis, that they are flawed by virtue of the candidate's inability to stand for the office. The consuls and praetors have the same opportunity, but it is clearly not in their interests (personal/political, that is, as following the law is demonstrably not within their concept of the well-being of the Respublica) to do so.
> >
> > Right now, by the virtue of the tribune's veto in accordance with our law, we have a sole censor in office, Galerius Paulinus.
> >
> > Vale,
> >
> > Cato
> >
> >
> >
> > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "marcushoratius" <MHoratius@> wrote:
> > >
> > > Salve Cato
> > >
> > > The only problem with your reasoning here is the discrepency between Agrippa's veto against the actions of magistrates and the reasoning he gave behind it. The reasoning he gave really concerned the candidacy of Modianus, based on an interpretation by Sulla, Gnaeus Caesar, and Potitius as to the meaning of "consecutive." That was a misinterpretation IMHO. We are nearly six months into the year. The history behind the issue of electing suffecti in Nova Roma, even going back to the time when suffecti were appointed by the Senate, never considered "consecutive" in the way it has been misinterpreted by these few individuals for their own political reasons. The conflict here has nothing to do with the law. None the less...
> > >
> > > If the problem was in the candidacy then a Tribunus Plebis should have vetoed the candidacy before the Comitia met. That is, he could have vetoed the Consul's acceptance of the candidacy of someone he thought unqualified. That would allow other candidates to be reviewed and "certified" by the Consuls as eligible and the Tribuni given an opportunity to review the eligibility of all candidates prior to the Comitia assembling.
> > >
> > > However, Tribunus Agrippa vetoed the certification process conducted by the Custodes after the election. He gave no reason as to why he thought that process of certification was in error. Once the candidates were set, the Comitia having already concluded its voting, the issue of candidacies was over. To veto the Custodes over a candidacy is a non sequiter. So what, I would like to know, did the Tribunus see in error with the certification process itself to overthrow what the People had decided? If the Custodes found no error in the election process of the Comitia itself and therefore legally certified the results, then Agrippa's intercessio is without basis and should be withdrawn.
> > >
> > > Vale
> > > M. Moravius Piscinus
> > >
> > > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Gaius Equitius Cato" <mlcinnyc@> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Cato Galerio Aureliano sal.
> > > >
> > > > Salve.
> > > >
> > > > Your veto is incorrect, as is most of the argument surrounding this issue. Vipsanius Agrippa has not pronounced intercessio against the right of the People to hold or vote in elections, nor did he veto the results themselves (nor could he, as neither the act of voting nor the results of an election are acts of a magistrate). He has issued a veto against the certification of the results by the custodes and the acceptance of the results by the consuls, which *are* acts of magistrates, based on the fact that he believes the results reflect a violation of the Constitution.
> > > >
> > > > In point of fact a tribune *can* stop a vote or an election from happening in the first place - this is the law under Nova Roma and was actually practiced by the ancient Romans - so stopping an election or a vote on legislation is *not* un-Roman in the least. It is the assumption - and application - of current post-Enlightenment political theory that makes this seem "unfair", but the ancient Romans would have recognized it as perfectly valid.
> > > >
> > > > Those who beat the "be Roman, act Roman, follow the Romans" drum should understand that actual ancient Roman political practice was not really in any way democratic or "fair" by contemporary standards.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Vale.
> > > >
> > > > Cato
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Robert Levee <galerius_of_rome@> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Salve et salvete,
> > > > >
> > > > > "I, Appius Galerius Aurelianus, tribune of the Plebs,
> > > > >
> > > > > In application of the paragraph IV.A.7b.of the Constitution of Nova Roma,
> > > > >
> > > > > Considering the Constitution of Nova Roma and of the laws which applies it and
> > > > > define the powers of the tribunes of the Plebs, especially in case of an intercessio,
> > > > >
> > > > > Considering the message nb 66421 issued in the Forum last Jun 7, 2009 4:32 pm by which
> > > > > Tribune G. Vipsanius Agrippa has pronounced "intercessio against the custodes Marcus Lucretius Agricola and
> > > > > Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus in certifying the election of Caeso Fabius Buteo
> > > > > Modianus as censor and against the consuls Marcus Iulius Severus and Marcus
> > > > > Cornelius Complutensis in accepting the election results",
> > > > >
> > > > > Considering that this intercessio violates the Constitution, and especially its
> > > > > article II, B, 3,
> > > > >
> > > > > Hereby veto the intercession thrown by Tribune G. Vipsanius Agrippa last Jun 7, 2009 4:32 pm."
> > > > >
> > > > > I have quoted the article II, B, 3 of the constitution. There may be other arguments, but this one (the right of Novaromans to take part in elections) is one of the good grounds here, for a tribune should never be eager to make his own voice prevailing on the People's one.
> > > > >
> > > > > Vale et valete,
> > > > > Ap.Galerius Aurelianus
> > > > > Tribune of the Plebs
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66610 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2009-06-10
Subject: Re: Intercessio - End of the period allotted for tribuni plebis to s
Cato Quintio Constantio sal.

Salve.

"You're welcome. Don't get too big a head, I said it was with considerable reservations."

<sigh>

Can no-one simply accept a statement for exactly what it says? I was brought up in such a way that if someone does something for you, you thank them. It's that simple.


Anyway, to the real discussion, you wrote:

"The lex Fabia de ratione comitorum centuriatorum provides that intercessio may be pronounced..."

Note carefully: the lex Fabia says "Intercessio may be exercised against either the entire election or vote, or against one or more individual items on the ballot." (III.B.1.a)

Now, in the next line, the lex says "The exercise of nuntiatio shall extend the Contio..." (III.B.1.b)

The difference is "may" and "shall". One is an imperative, the other is not. The tribunes may pronounce intercessio if they want to, but it does not say they may *only* pronounce it at that point. The lex itself makes a marked difference between the two concepts.

But above all, the Constitution guarantees the tribunes the right

"To pronounce intercessio (intercession; a veto) against the actions of any other magistrate...when the spirit and / or letter of this Constitution...are being violated thereby" (Const. N.R. IV.7.A)

And the leges Labiena de intercessione and Didia Gemina de potestate tribunicia then fulfill the Constitution's reference to legislation which defines the exercise of the power.

If any other lex appears to conflict or restrict these powers, the Constitutional language overrides them, and the authority granted by it and the two leges above hold.

Vale,

Cato
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66611 From: marcushoratius Date: 2009-06-10
Subject: Re: Intercessio!
M. Moravius C. Cato salutem

They are however employed in Nova Roma and thus must be reviewed by proper authority as to whether they were conducted correctly. The Tribuni Plebis would be interested to see if any partiality was allowed in using lots. No one has ever misused the method and I am certain with our current Custodes that neither of them would ever have done so. Being that sortition is a form of augury, the casting of lots also falls under the review of the Augures under the authority of the Constitution VI.B.2.a.2 to ensure that the procedures followed complied with augural prescriptions and that nothing would vitiate the results.



--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Gaius Equitius Cato" <mlcinnyc@...> wrote:
>
> Cato Moravio Piscino sal.
>
> Salve.
>
> Interestingly, regarding the drawing of lots:
>
> "This sort of divining, however, has now been discarded by general usage. The beauty and age of the temple still preserve the name of the lots of Praeneste — that is, among the common people, for no magistrate and no man of any reputation ever consults them; but in all other places lots have gone entirely out of use. And this explains the remark which, according to Clitomachus, Carneades used to make that he had at no other place seen Fortune more fortunate than at Praeneste. Then let us dismiss this branch of divination." - Cicero, On Divination 2.41.86-87
>
> Valete,
>
> Cato
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66612 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2009-06-10
Subject: Re: Intercessio!
Cato Moravio Piscino sal.

Salve!

Good enough.

Vale,

Cato


--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "marcushoratius" <MHoratius@...> wrote:
>
> M. Moravius C. Cato salutem
>
> They are however employed in Nova Roma and thus must be reviewed by proper authority as to whether they were conducted correctly. The Tribuni Plebis would be interested to see if any partiality was allowed in using lots. No one has ever misused the method and I am certain with our current Custodes that neither of them would ever have done so. Being that sortition is a form of augury, the casting of lots also falls under the review of the Augures under the authority of the Constitution VI.B.2.a.2 to ensure that the procedures followed complied with augural prescriptions and that nothing would vitiate the results.
>
>
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Gaius Equitius Cato" <mlcinnyc@> wrote:
> >
> > Cato Moravio Piscino sal.
> >
> > Salve.
> >
> > Interestingly, regarding the drawing of lots:
> >
> > "This sort of divining, however, has now been discarded by general usage. The beauty and age of the temple still preserve the name of the lots of Praeneste — that is, among the common people, for no magistrate and no man of any reputation ever consults them; but in all other places lots have gone entirely out of use. And this explains the remark which, according to Clitomachus, Carneades used to make that he had at no other place seen Fortune more fortunate than at Praeneste. Then let us dismiss this branch of divination." - Cicero, On Divination 2.41.86-87
> >
> > Valete,
> >
> > Cato
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66613 From: fauxrari Date: 2009-06-10
Subject: Re: Roman cookery
Salve!
I had a Saturnalia party last December and cooked a truely Roman meal with recipies I'd found on the internet from Cato and Apicius. Some of it was very exotic while most of it was very delicious. I would desribe it as a variation on 'California' cuisine- light and flavorful. Most of the recipies were easy. The hardest part was figuring out how much to use since no amounts were given as that would be considered common knowledge to any cook of the period. I can email the recipies to anyone interested. Good luck!
Vale,
L. Antonia Auriga

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Jesse Corradino <woden66@...> wrote:
>
>
> Are there any genuinely tastey roman dishes? In the last year or so of my life I've committed myself to learn how to cook for two reasons: one, I'm pretty much the last member of my family to keep a lot of our recipes alive and two, I've recently had a daughter (Claudia) who I don't want to see grow up eating frozen food from a grocery store. Anyway, I really love the hobby and so now I'm always looking meals I can brag about. One of the reasons I was drawn to Nova Roma was to find out more about this topic, so I'm curious if anyone has some feedback :)
>
>
>
>
>
> > To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> > From: dis_pensible@...
> > Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2009 22:42:25 +0000
> > Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Roman cookery
> >
> > Salve Felix,
> >
> > I had meant to thank you for this earlier but it got lost, and since we were talking about food today I search for it. I will add some more ancient recipes as time permits;)
> > Pasta con sarde is one of my favorites and somewhere in here I believe I can recreate the recipe from when I was growing up.
> > The second recipe looks great but i will add either tomato paste or maybe some Roma tomatoes and omit the breadcrumbs. I will save these and experiment sometime in the future;)
> >
> > Again thank you!
> >
> > Salve,
> > Julia
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "wuffa2001" <magewuffa@> wrote:
> > >
> > > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "L Julia Aquila" <dis_pensible@> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Salvete
> > > >
> > > > Anyone have a good recipe for Pasta Con Sarde? And yes I understand from what we know, pasta was not used in Rome however the traditional base for the sauce does have its roots in Roma. Thanks in advance.
> > > >
> > > > Valete,
> > > > Julia
> > > >
> > >
> > > Salve
> > > well there this one I like have it 1 to 2 times a year
> > >
> > > INGREDIENTS (Nutrition)
> > >
> > > * 1 (16 ounce) package spaghetti
> > > * 3/4 cup olive oil, divided
> > > * 6 cloves garlic, minced
> > > * 2 (4 ounce) cans sardines packed in olive oil, drained
> > > * 1 cup seasoned bread crumbs
> > > * 1/3 cup freshly grated Parmesan cheese
> > > * 1/4 cup chopped fresh parsley
> > > * 1 teaspoon ground black pepper
> > > * additional Parmesan cheese for serving (optional)
> > >
> > > DIRECTIONS
> > >
> > > 1. Bring a large pot of lightly salted water to a boil. Add the spaghetti, and cook until al dente, or 8 to 10 minutes. Drain, and rinse under cold water. Toss with 1/4 cup olive oil, cover and keep warm.
> > > 2. Place another 1/4 cup olive oil in a skillet, and heat over medium heat. Stir in the garlic, and cook just until golden, 2 to 3 minutes. Add the sardines, and cook 1 minute more. Stir in the bread crumbs and 1/3 cup Parmesan cheese. If necessary to give the mixture a crumbly texture, stir in the remaining 1/4 cup of olive oil. Stir in the parsley and pepper, and remove from the heat. If desired, serve with additional Parmesan cheese.
> > >
> > > ==================================================================
> > > and this one is good
> > >
> > > Pasta con le Sarde (Pasta with Sardine Sauce)
> > >
> > > This is a classic Sicilian dish from Palermo,created when the Saracens ruled Sicily. Sicilians would use the fennel that grows wild in the lava-rich soil which is a more intense taste than the cultivated.
> > >
> > > * 2 pounds fresh sardines
> > > * 1 1/2 pounds bulb fennel, thickly sliced
> > > * 1/2 cup olive oil
> > > * 2 onions, finely sliced
> > > * 4 anchovy filets
> > > * 1/2 cup pine nuts
> > > * 1/2 cup golden raisins
> > > * 1 package saffron
> > > * Salt and pepper to taste
> > > * 1 pound bucatini
> > > * 1 cup breadcrumbs
> > >
> > > METHOD
> > >
> > > Preheat oven to 350°F.
> > >
> > > Remove heads and tails from half the sardines. Cut in 1 inch pieces. Leave second half intact.
> > >
> > > Wash and trim fennel. Put into pan with about 8 cups cold, salted water. Bring to a boil and cook until tender, about 5- 8 minutes. Remove with slotted spoon, drain in colander, then gently squeeze out water. Chop roughly. Reserve cooking water.
> > >
> > > Heat 1/4 cup oil in frying pan. Sauté onions over medium heat until golden. Add chopped sardines and anchovies. As they cook, crush sardines with back of spoon to make a thick paste. Add pine nuts, raisins, saffron, salt and pepper.
> > >
> > > In a separate pan, heat remaining oil and lightly sauté the fennel, removing to a separate bowl. Sauté the remaining whole sardines. Cook until tender, about 10 minutes, turning once gently to not break sardines.
> > >
> > > Using fennel water, boil pasta until al dente, about 10 -= 12 minutes. Drain. Put in bowl and dress with half the sardine sauce.
> > >
> > > Put a layer of dressed pasta in an ovenproof casserole. On top of that, put a layer of fennel, then a a layer of whole sardines with additional sauce. Continue until ingredients are used up, ending with a layer of bucatini. Cover with breadcrumbs. Sprinkle breadcrumbs over top. Cover and bake in preheated 350°F oven 15 - 20 minutes.
> > >
> > > Pasta may be served hot or cold.
> > >
> > > Serves: 6
> > >
> > > it is very good Cold
> > > ====================================================================
> > > and
> > >
> > > olive oil
> > > 1 fennel bulb, trimmed and thinly sliced, fronds reserved for garnish
> > > 3 fat cloves garlic, thinly sliced
> > > 3-4 anchovy filets
> > > 1 28-ounce can whole tomatoes in tomato puree
> > > 4-5 basil leaves
> > > dry white wine
> > > juice of 1 lemon
> > > red pepper flakes to taste
> > > 1/3 cup golden raisins
> > > 1 tin sardines in olive oil
> > > Italian flat-leaf parsley, for garnish
> > > 1/2 pound spaghetti or linguine
> > >
> > > Heat olive oil in large skillet over medium heat. Add sliced fennel and cook, stirring, until fennel begins to soften. Add garlic slices and cook until fragrant and garlic begins to soften. Add anchovy filets to skillet and crush them into a paste with the back of a spoon, then stir into the fennel and garlic.
> > >
> > > Add tomatoes, crushing with the back of the spoon until they're broken up. Throw in the basil leaves, a glug of white wine and and the lemon juice, red pepper flakes, and golden raisins. Stir well, then add sardine filets to the pan and spoon a little sauce over them. Lower heat and simmer for about 30 minutes.
> > >
> > > At this point, set a large pot of water over high heat. When water comes to a boil add salt (I used about 1 1/2 tablespoons) and stir in the pasta. Cook until al dente.
> > >
> > > When pasta is ready, break up sardines with the spoon and stir them into the sauce. Add pasta to the sauce along with about 1/2 cup of the pasta cooking water, stir, and simmer until pasta has cooked through.
> > >
> > > To serve, top with toasted bread crumbs (or a big grating of hard cheese, if you're so inclined), and garnish with fennel fronds or parsley.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Vale
> > >
> > > MCF take care
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------------
> >
> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Windows Live™ SkyDrive™: Get 25 GB of free online storage.
> http://windowslive.com/online/skydrive?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_SD_25GB_062009
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66614 From: Publius Ullerius Stephanus Venator Date: 2009-06-10
Subject: Re: Another little brag. . .
heya;

On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 10:13 AM, Jesse Corradino wrote
>
> There aren't seriously people who make sauce with ketchup, are there?  I'm
> crying blood!
>

Actually, my wife has a recipe from her mom, which is an
"Americanized" version of a Greek meat sauce that does use catsup as
one of the flavoring components. It is mighty tasty.

Venathustra
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66615 From: M.C.C. Date: 2009-06-10
Subject: Re: Intercessio - End of the period allotted for tribuni plebis to s
Galerius Aurelianus dixit> Only the Tribunes have the authority to agree
or disagree with the intercessio of one of their colleagues; or a
dictator or interrex.

MCC> Sorry, but I'm free to disagree with your invalid intercessio

Galerius Aurelianus dixit> The Consuls do not have the authority to
overturn the intercessio of a Tribunus Plebis after the end of the 72 hours.

MCC> What intercessio? Your invalid intercessio? Your fake intercessio?
Your illegal intercessio? Nobody can overturn a valid intercessio. But
this intercessio does not exist it is invalid.

First because you can not veto the normal activity of the Custodes,

2nd because the Custodes have not certify nothing in this elections: the
work was made by the Diribitores and the final report was issued by the
diribitores,

3rd because the Consuls have not said that they accept the result of the
election, only, one of the consuls forwarded the final report of the
Diribitores,

4th because the author of the intercessio had not wrote my official name

5th because according the Lex Didia Gemina de potestate tribunicia
II.A.1.b the intercessio of the Tribuni must include the official name
and office of the magistrate(s) against whose act or acts the
intercessio or auxilium has been interposed.

6th because in accordance with the Lex Didia Gemina de potestate
tribunicia II.A.1.c the intercessio of the Tribuni must include the
article(s) of the Constitution or the leges violated by the magistrate's
act(s), and the author of the intercessio have not quoted nothing,
because nor the diribitores nor the consuls have violated the
Constitution or the leges.

7th because the Lex Didia Gemina de potestate tribunicia explicly said
that the intercessio must include three elements and the author of the
intercessio only have fullfilled one.

8th because the Tribuni Plebis are not over the law and they, also they,
must follow the law and in this case the Tribuni must follow the Lex
Didia Gemina de potestate tribunicia

Galerius Aurelianus dixit> Every citizen has the right to state that
they do not agree with an intercessio and ask that the Tribune withdraw
it. Every citizen has the right to point out their opinion about why an
intercessio is not worded well or why they believe it is not in
accordance with a specific law.

MCC> I did it, but my messages were ignored, but you the Tribuni can not
ignore the law, and if you wish issue an intercessio you must follow the
Lex Didia Gemina de potestate tribunicia to write it.

Galerius Aurelianus dixit> .......I shall be forced to fine you under
the Lex Didia Gemina de potestate tribunica, Section III, A in the
amount of thirty U.S. dollars ($30.00) paid to the treasure........

MCC> The Lex Didia Gemina de potestate tribunica, Section III, A says:
".....any citizen or magistrate who interferes with the official
action(s) of a Tribunus Plebis shall be fined......." and according the
law you first must to demostrate that I have interfere with your
official action as I have demostrate that the veto of Tribunus Agrippa
is invalid according the law. Your words show you want to impose your
will and you're disparaging the office of tribune.


No one, in Nova Roma, can accept your invalid veto, no one should
accept your invalid veto.

And make it clear that I am not say that the veto is invalid, the law
says that the veto is invalid.

Curate ut valeatis

M. Curiatius Complutensis
Consul

P.S.: the tribuni are not exempted from the law
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66616 From: l.coruncanius_cato@yahoo.com Date: 2009-06-10
Subject: Re: Intercessio
L. Coruncanius Cato Fl. Galerio Aureliano Tribunus Plebis SPD

With all due respect:

My point of view is that placing an intercessio on an electoral result, after the election is decided, is something against the will of the people assembled on the Comitia Centuriata, so it is unlawful and illegal. You (all tribunes) had plenty of time to veto one of the candidacies, but you choose not to say nothing, and now you make a movement that can be seen as a try to overturn a decision taken by all citizens of NR. And Tribunes are not a figure for overturning a decision taken by all cives of NR. They are suposed to defend them! That's the reason for my post.

And now I see you take this very reasoning, doing things within time, to avoid an invalid intercessio being rejected. Sorry, but what is written is written and means what it means, and you can not lecture anybody to read and understand a law and a constitution when you seem not to be aware of and not willing to comply with them. Even when the Tribunes are sacrosanct, they are not beyond the law.

Agrippa was wrong earlier, you are wrong now. Again, I don't think these words are an interference to a Tribune official action, neither harming any Tribune, and much less refusing to abide by the legal exercise of intercessio.

As a plebeian citizen, and Magistrate of NR, I must speak to those suposed to defend my rights and those of all cives of NR. I said that in my election statements, and this is what I am doing, and will keep doing. If now you consider that you must apply Summa Coercendi Potestas, it's up to you, I will accept your decision. But I will not be silent when I see things getting done in the wrong way.

Despite all, I am glad to know about your support on the past election, and I thank you. I also hope that disagreeing on this point does not stop any posible relation in the future.

Di te incolumem custodiant.
--
L. Coruncanius Cato
Aedilis Curulis
Scriba Consulis Hispaniae

--- El mié, 10/6/09, PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@... <PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@...> escribió:

De: PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@... <PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@...>
Asunto: Re: [Nova-Roma] Intercessio
Para: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Fecha: miércoles, 10 junio, 2009 4:20

Fl. Galerius Aurelianus Tribunus Plebis L.Coruncanius Cato sal.

It is one thing to point out that a Tribune has not followed the specifics of a law about the proper application of the Lex Labiena de intercessione and/or the Lex Didia Gemina de potestate tribunicia so as to insure that an intercessio will stand.  However, it is quite another thing when you state that a properly applied intercessio is illegal.  Every citizen has the right to state that they do not agree with an intercessio and ask that the Tribune withdraw it.  Every citizen has the right to point out their opinion about why an intercessio is not worded well or why they believe it is not in accordance with a specific law.  NO ONE has the right to interfere with the official action of a Tribunus Plebis, do violence to a Tribunus Plebis in the course of his or her official duties, or refuse to abide by the legal exercise of intercessio.

If you want to continue to act and think and say what you will, do so.  I stated that you were dangerously close to violating a certain portion of the Lex Didia Gemina de potestate tribunicia.    

I supported you in the last election because I felt that you had a decent grasp of our Constitution and by-laws.  I recommend that you study the laws that are specific to the office of tribune to avoid any unfortunate results.

Vale.


-----Original Message-----
From: l.coruncanius_ cato@yahoo. com
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps. com
Sent: Tue, 9 Jun 2009 1:48 pm
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Intercessio



L. Coruncanius Cato Galerio Aureliano Tribunus Plebis SPD,

Sorry if saying what I think is viewed as "interfering with the official action of a Tribunus Plebis".

I said what I thought, and still think, and I will not step back. I must advise you about the last message from Equitius Cato, who told your cousin and also Tribune his intercessio is not valid, IMHO, it should be considered an interference to a Tribune's action, and sensitive of applying the full wheight of Summa Coercendi Potestas.

I humbly ask you to read some further messages of mine, when I state clearly that all Tribunes have their own mind and must act on their own will. I don't believe this is interfering with a Tribunus action. As I said during the contio in april, I abide the law.
But I ask you too to not place words I have not said in my mouth and after issue a threat like this, because I will defend my self.

Di vos incolumem custodiant.
--
L. Coruncanius Ca to
Aedilis Curulis
Scriba Consulis Hispaniae

--- El lun, 8/6/09, PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@ aol.com <PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@ aol.com> escribió:

De: PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@ aol.com <PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@ aol.com>
Asunto: Re: [Nova-Roma] Intercessio
Para: Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com
Fecha: lunes, 8 junio, 2009 7:43

Fl. Galerius Aurelianus Tribunus Plebis L. Coruncanio Cato. sal.

Your message comes dangerously close to violating certain sections of the Consitution and the lex Dida Genima de potestate tribunicia could be applied.  I recommend that you withdraw the statement and rephrase it with terms such as "in your opinion."  If you continue to interfere with the official action of a Tribunus Plebis, I will bring the weight of the Summa Coercendi Potestas against you.  The same applies to any other citizen who interferes with the official action of a Tribunus Plebis.

Vale.



-----Original Message-----
From: Lucius Coruncanius Cato <l.coruncanius_ cato@yahoo. com>
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com
Sent: Mon, 8 Jun 2009 4:56 am
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Intercessio



L. Coruncanius Cato omn. spd,

I am with you, Venator, in this statement. Time for vetoing the candidacy ended with the contio. Now it is time to move forward. This intercesio is not only unlawful, as it comes long past the 72h period, but a very dangerous movement, as it is a long step backwards and sets up a preced ent for those who doesn't like the results of an election. One might not like the results, but trying to overturn them by veto is really antidemocratic, and those gestures are only seen in places where the voice of citizens or members means less than wet paper.

I also agree with the needing of rewriting some of the laws involved in this election, to make them pristine clear, with words stating what they intend to mean, and permitting no interpretation. I sent a proposal to the Law Review commitee on those leges, which has been ignored by most of those who complain about the meaning and interpretation of those laws.

This shows, to me, that these actions and wills from those persons are not for the better of NR, but an intent to bring down all what has been accomplished for the last 11 years. I know coexistence is hard sometimes, but we have to carry on with it. And Venator shows this spirit by not resigning when he does not like something, and by the will to be part of the solution, and not of the problem.

I too ask for the tribunes to block this intercessio, even when it is not legal and should not be placed, and I humbly ask you, tribune Agrippa, to think about20what you are doing, why yo do it, and what are the effects.

Di vos incolumem custodiant.

--
L. Coruncanius Cato
Aedilis Curulis
Scriba Consulis Hispaniae

--- El dom, 7/6/09, Publius Ullerius Stephanus Venator <famila.ulleria. venii@gmail. com> escri bió:

De: Publius Ullerius Stephanus Venator <famila.ulleria. venii@gmail. com>
Asunto: Re: [Nova-Roma] Intercessio
Para: Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com
Fecha: domingo, 7 junio, 2009 7:11

Avete Omnes;

I ask the other tribunes, as a long time Cives Nova Roma, to help
things move along by opposing this Intercession.

I was a voice, albeit a fairly quiet one, in opposition to the
candidacy of Modianus for Censor.

I still believe the Law under which his candidacy was touted as legal
and opposed as illegal is poorly written and too open to
interpretation. Our Laws need clarity, brevity and simplicity. Law
must not only be for the lawyers, it must be primarily for the
understanding by and protection of the People.

We must needs not try and cover every situation; having macronational
law, statute and regulation, which supersedes what we do here.

However, the Vox Populi has been heard, and is that not the true
foundation of any Res Publica? If the People do not contest the
legitimacy of a Law, it stands.

The majo rity of the People, by their resounding silence, also lent
tacit approval to the candidacy of Modianus. This intercession is, in
my opinion, an ex post facto attempt at what should have been resolved
during the discussion before the Cista opened.

By the vote count and tally, Modianus has the confidence of a majority
of the members of the Centuries.

Yes, this note has an air of resignation about it; what's done is
done, que sera, sera.

There are problems, which need to be addressed, and I will try better
to be a part of the solution. I am not considering leaving, neither
the Senate, the Lictorship nor Nova Roma, though I will step back from
committee and scribal appointments to ponder things. (...and, yes, I
realize I'd already been a bit withdrawn in those arenas already.) I
need time to think.

To my friends herein, I know this is unexpected, but did you really
see something different coming, in light of my nature?

I have made no enemies in Nova Roma, though there are a few who I find
useless to the future of our endeavor. I shall no longer respond to
them, neither directly nor indirectly, neither here nor elsewhere.

In closing, I ask again that the other Tribunes block this
Intercession and be more proactive in the future.

============ ========= ========= ========= ==
In amicitia et fides -
Publius Ullerius Stephanus Venator
Ci vis circa Quintilis MMDCCLI a.u.c.
Senator et Lictor

Religio Septentrionalis - Poeta
------------ --------- --------- ---
May the Holy Powers smile on our efforts.
May the Spirits of our family lines nod in approval.
May we be of Worth to our fellow Nova Romans.



Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66617 From: Maior Date: 2009-06-10
Subject: Re: Intercessio
M. Hortensia Quiritibus spd;
I wrote to A.Apollonius Cordus, about the historical issue, being concerned to act with the mos of the Republic. Here is his reply about the tribunes of the plebs veto:

"as to do with the comitial process itself: it was forbidden to veto the comitial process after voting had actually been set in motion. This being so, it was of course totally out of the question to veto the result of a vote after the voting had finished."

You are free to contact him about Roman history and what was done in the res publica, he won't answer any questions about modern made up legal issue.
bene valete
Marca Hortensia Maior


In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, l.coruncanius_cato@... wrote:
>
> L. Coruncanius Cato Fl. Galerio Aureliano Tribunus Plebis SPD
>
> With all due respect:
>
> My point of view is that placing an intercessio on an electoral result, after the election is decided, is something against the will of the people assembled on the Comitia Centuriata, so it is unlawful and illegal. You (all tribunes) had plenty of time to veto one of the candidacies, but you choose not to say nothing, and now you make a movement that can be seen as a try to overturn a decision taken by all citizens of NR. And Tribunes are not a figure for overturning a decision taken by all cives of NR. They are suposed to defend them! That's the
> reason for my post.
>
> And now I see you take this very reasoning, doing things within time, to avoid an invalid intercessio being rejected. Sorry, but what is written is written and means what it means, and you can not lecture anybody to read and understand a law and a constitution when you seem not to be aware of and not willing to comply with them. Even when the Tribunes are sacrosanct, they are not beyond the law.
>
> Agrippa was wrong earlier, you are wrong now. Again, I don't think these words are an interference to a Tribune official action, neither harming any Tribune, and much less refusing to abide by the legal exercise of intercessio.
>
> As a plebeian citizen, and Magistrate of NR, I must speak to those suposed to defend my rights and those of all cives of NR. I said that in my election statements, and this is what I am doing, and will keep doing. If now you consider that you must apply Summa Coercendi Potestas, it's
> up to you, I will accept your decision. But I will not be silent when I see
> things getting done in the wrong way.
>
> Despite all, I am glad to know about your support on the past election, and I thank you. I also hope that disagreeing on this point does not stop any posible relation in the future.
>
> Di te incolumem custodiant.
>
> --
>
> L. Coruncanius Cato
>
> Aedilis Curulis
>
> Scriba Consulis Hispaniae
>
> --- El mié, 10/6/09, PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@... <PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@...> escribió:
>
> De: PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@... <PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@...>
> Asunto: Re: [Nova-Roma] Intercessio
> Para: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> Fecha: miércoles, 10 junio, 2009 4:20
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Fl. Galerius Aurelianus Tribunus Plebis L.Coruncanius Cato sal.
>
>
>
> It is one thing to point out that a Tribune has not followed the specifics of a law about the proper application of the Lex Labiena de intercessione and/or the Lex Didia Gemina de potestate tribunicia so as to insure that an intercessio will stand.  However, it is quite another thing when you state that a properly applied intercessio is illegal.  Every citizen has the right to state that they do not agree with an intercessio and ask that the Tribune withdraw it.  Every citizen has the right to point out their opinion about why an intercessio is not worded well or why they believe it is not in accordance with a specific law.  NO ONE has the right to interfere with the official action of a Tribunus Plebis, do violence to a Tribunus Plebis in the course of his or her official duties, or refuse to abide by the legal exercise of intercessio.
>
>
>
> If you want to continue to act and think and say what you will, do so.  I stated that you were dangerously close to violating a certain portion of the Lex Didia Gemina de potestate tribunicia.    
>
>
>
> I supported you in the last election because I felt that you had a decent grasp of our Constitution and by-laws.  I recommend that you study the laws that are specific to the office of tribune to avoid any unfortunate results.
>
>
>
> Vale.
>
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
>
> From: l.coruncanius_ cato@yahoo. com
>
> To: Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.
> com
>
> Sent: Tue, 9 Jun 2009 1:48 pm
>
> Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Intercessio
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> L. Coruncanius Cato Galerio Aureliano Tribunus Plebis SPD,
>
>
>
> Sorry if saying what I think is viewed as "interfering with the official action of a Tribunus Plebis".
>
>
>
> I said what I thought, and still think, and I will not step back. I must advise you about the last message from Equitius Cato, who told your cousin and also Tribune his intercessio is not valid, IMHO, it should be considered an interference to a Tribune's action, and sensitive of applying the full wheight of Summa Coercendi Potestas.
>
>
>
> I humbly ask you to read some further messages of mine, when I state clearly that all Tribunes have their own mind and must act on their own will. I don't believe this is interfering with a Tribunus action. As I said during the contio in april, I abide the law.
>
> But I ask you too to not place words I have not said in my mouth and after issue a threat like this, because I will defend my self.
>
>
>
> Di vos incolumem custodiant.
>
> --
>
> L. Coruncanius Ca
> to
>
> Aedilis Curulis
>
> Scriba Consulis Hispaniae
>
>
>
> --- El lun, 8/6/09, PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@ aol.com <PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@ aol.com> escribió:
>
>
>
>
> De: PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@ aol.com <PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@ aol.com>
>
> Asunto: Re: [Nova-Roma] Intercessio
>
> Para: Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com
>
> Fecha: lunes, 8 junio, 2009 7:43
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Fl. Galerius Aurelianus Tribunus Plebis L. Coruncanio Cato. sal.
>
>
>
> Your message comes dangerously close to violating certain sections of the Consitution and the lex Dida Genima de potestate tribunicia could be applied.  I recommend that you withdraw the statement and rephrase it with terms such as "in your opinion."  If you continue to interfere with the official action of a Tribunus Plebis, I will bring the weight of the Summa Coercendi Potestas against you.  The same applies to any other citizen who interferes with the official action of a Tribunus Plebis.
>
>
>
> Vale.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
>
> From: Lucius Coruncanius Cato <l.coruncanius_ cato@yahoo. com>
>
> To: Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com
>
> Sent: Mon, 8 Jun 2009 4:56 am
>
> Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Intercessio
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> L. Coruncanius Cato omn. spd,
>
>
>
> I
> am with you, Venator, in this statement. Time for vetoing the candidacy ended with the contio. Now it is time to move forward. This intercesio is not only unlawful, as it comes long past the 72h period, but a very dangerous movement, as it is a long step backwards and sets up a preced ent for those who doesn't like the results of an election. One might not like the results, but trying to overturn them by veto is really antidemocratic, and those gestures are only seen in places where the voice of citizens or members means less than wet paper.
>
>
>
> I also agree with the needing of rewriting some of the laws involved in this election, to make them pristine clear, with words stating what they intend to mean, and permitting no interpretation. I sent a proposal to the Law Review commitee on those leges, which has been ignored by most of those who complain about the meaning and interpretation of those laws.
>
>
>
> This shows, to me, that these actions and wills from those persons are not for the better of NR, but an intent to bring down all what has been accomplished for the last 11 years. I know coexistence is hard sometimes, but we have to carry on with it. And Venator shows this spirit by not resigning when he does not like something, and by the will to be part of the solution, and not of the problem.
>
>
>
> I too ask for the tribunes to block this intercessio, even when it is not legal and should not be placed, and I humbly ask you, tribune Agrippa, to think about20what you are doing, why yo do it, and what are the effects.
>
>
>
> Di vos incolumem custodiant.
>
>
>
> --
>
> L. Coruncanius Cato
>
> Aedilis Curulis
>
> Scriba Consulis Hispaniae
>
>
>
> --- El dom, 7/6/09, Publius Ullerius Stephanus Venator <famila.ulleria. venii@gmail. com> escri bió:
>
>
>
>
> De: Publius Ullerius Stephanus Venator <famila.ulleria. venii@gmail. com>
>
> Asunto: Re: [Nova-Roma] Intercessio
>
> Para: Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com
>
> Fecha: domingo, 7 junio, 2009 7:11
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Avete Omnes;
>
>
>
> I ask the other tribunes, as a long time Cives Nova Roma, to help
>
> things move along by opposing this Intercession.
>
>
>
> I was a voice, albeit a fairly quiet one, in opposition to the
>
> candidacy of Modianus for Censor.
>
>
>
> I still believe the Law under which his candidacy was touted as legal
>
> and opposed as illegal is poorly written and too open to
>
> interpretation. Our Laws need clarity, brevity and simplicity. Law
>
> must not only be for the lawyers, it must be primarily for the
>
> understanding by and protection of the People.
>
>
>
> We must needs not try and cover every situation; having macronational
>
> law, statute and regulation, which supersedes what we do here.
>
>
>
> However, the Vox Populi has been heard, and is that not the true
>
> foundation of any Res Publica? If the People do not contest the
>
> legitimacy of a Law, it stands.
>
>
>
> The majo
> rity of the People, by their resounding silence, also lent
>
> tacit approval to the candidacy of Modianus. This intercession is, in
>
> my opinion, an ex post facto attempt at what should have been resolved
>
> during the discussion before the Cista opened.
>
>
>
> By the vote count and tally, Modianus has the confidence of a majority
>
> of the members of the Centuries.
>
>
>
> Yes, this note has an air of resignation about it; what's done is
>
> done, que sera, sera.
>
>
>
> There are problems, which need to be addressed, and I will try better
>
> to be a part of the solution. I am not considering leaving, neither
>
> the Senate, the Lictorship nor Nova Roma, though I will step back from
>
> committee and scribal appointments to ponder things. (...and, yes, I
>
> realize I'd already been a bit withdrawn in those arenas already.) I
>
> need time to think.
>
>
>
> To my friends herein, I know this is unexpected, but did you really
>
> see something different coming, in light of my nature?
>
>
>
> I have made no enemies in Nova Roma, though there are a few who I find
>
> useless to the future of our endeavor. I shall no longer respond to
>
> them, neither directly nor indirectly, neither here nor elsewhere.
>
>
>
> In closing, I ask again that the other Tribunes block this
>
> Intercession and be more proactive in the future.
>
>
>
> ============ ========= ========= ========= ==
>
> In amicitia et fides -
>
> Publius Ullerius Stephanus Venator
>
> Ci
> vis circa Quintilis MMDCCLI a.u.c.
>
> Senator et Lictor
>
>
>
> Religio Septentrionalis - Poeta
>
> ------------ --------- --------- ---
>
> May the Holy Powers smile on our efforts.
>
> May the Spirits of our family lines nod in approval.
>
> May we be of Worth to our fellow Nova Romans.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> An Excellent Credit Score is 750. See Yours in Just 2 Easy Steps!
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Dell Inspiron 15 Laptop: Now in 6 vibrant colors! Shop Dell's full line of laptops.
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66618 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2009-06-10
Subject: Re: Intercessio
Cato Coruncanio Catoni sal.

Salve.

Our law says nothing about the tribunes being unable to veto election results; it does, however, say very clearly that the tribunes have the power

"To pronounce intercessio (intercession; a veto) against the actions of any other magistrate (with the exception of the dictator and the interrex), Senatus consulta, magisterial edicta, religious decreta, and leges passed by the comitia when the spirit and / or letter of this Constitution or legally-enacted edicta or decreta, Senatus Consulta or leges are being violated thereby" (Const. N.R. IV.A.7.a)

So they do have the power to veto laws passed in the comitia - which is the voice of the will of the People.

As to Cordus' information, I once again remind us that we operate not under ancient Roman law but under Nova Roman law. The ancient Romans did not even have a written, supreme constitutional document; does this mean we should ignore our Constitution? If we do not like this, we need to change the law - our law. Until we do so, we abide by our law.

Vale,

Cato
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66619 From: L Julia Aquila Date: 2009-06-10
Subject: Classic Poetry, Prose, Proems, Literature Excerpts
Salvete Omnes,

I am beginning a new thread because the old title still shows up and not every day is Dies Nefastus Publicus. This is a continuation of the old thread, some of which I may recycle from time to time:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma/post?act=reply&messageNum=66584
Please remember this is a thread for every Nova Roma Citizen and guest, so please feel free to post your choice of Classic Poetry, Prose, Proems, Literature ~


For this hour's selection -

Let us remember Vesta today, Her Eternal Fire, Her Fairness and Her Mercy. Let's turn away for a time from strife and politics and adore Her, ask for Her Blessings, to bestow us with Strength and pledge to keep Her in our hearts and support Her Vestals who make sacrifices to keep Her Eternal Flame burning for the benefit of our Respublica, of our fellow citizens of Nova Roma.

Fasti IV, 291-328 Ovidus

She'd arrived at the mouth (ostia) where the Tiber divides
To meet the deep, and flows with a wider sweep:
All the Knights, grave Senators, and commoners,
Came to meet her at the mouth of the Tuscan river.
[295] With them walked mothers, daughters, and brides,
And all those virgins who tend the sacred fires.
The men wearied their arms hauling hard on the ropes:
The foreign vessel barely made way against the stream.
For a long time there'd been a drought: the grass was dry
[300] And scorched: the boat stuck fast in the muddy shallows.
Every man, hauling, laboured beyond his strength,
And encouraged their toiling hands with his cries.
Yet the ship lodged there, like an island fixed in mid-ocean:
And astonished at the portent, men stood and quaked.
[305] Claudia Quinta traced her descent from noble Clausus,
And her beauty was in no way unequal to her nobility:
She was chaste, but not believed so: hostile rumour
Had wounded her, false charges were levelled at her:
Her elegance, promenading around in various hairstyles,
[310] And her ready tongue, with stiff old men, counted against her.
Conscious of virtue, she laughed at the rumoured lies,
But we're always ready to credit others with faults.
Now, when she'd stepped from the line of chaste women,
Taking pure river water in her hands, she wetted her head
[315] Three times, three times lifted her palms to the sky,
(Everyone watching her thought she'd lost her mind)
Then, kneeling, fixed her eyes on the goddess's statue,
And, with loosened hair, uttered these words:
" Kind and fruitful Mother of the Gods, accept
[320] A suppliant's prayers, on this one condition:
They deny I'm chaste: let me be guilty if you condemn me:
Convicted by a goddess I'll pay for it with my life.
But if I'm free of guilt, grant a pledge of my innocence
By your action: and, chaste, give way to my chaste hands."
[325] She spoke: then gave a slight pull at the rope,
(A wonder, but the sacred drama attests what I say):
The goddess stirred, followed, and, following, approved her:
Witness the sound of jubilation carried to the stars.
They came to a bend in the river (called of old
[330] The Halls of Tiber): there the stream turns left, ascending.
Night fell: they tied the rope to an oak stump,
And, having eaten, settled to a tranquil sleep.
Dawn rose: they loosed the rope from the oak stump,
After first laying a fire and offering incense,
[335] And crowned the stern, and sacrificed a heifer
Free of blemish, that had never known yoke or bull.
There's a place where smooth-flowing Almo joins the Tiber,
And the lesser flow loses its name in the greater:
There, a white-headed priest in purple robes
[340] Washed the Lady, and sacred relics, in Almo's water.
The attendants howled, and the mad flutes blew,
And soft hands beat at the bull's-hide drums.
Claudia walked in front with a joyful face,
Her chastity proven by the goddess's testimony:
[345] The goddess herself, sitting in a cart, entered the Capene Gate:
Fresh flowers were scattered over the yoked oxen.
Nasica received her. The name of her temple's founder is lost:
Augustus has re-dedicated it, and, before him, Metellus.

Translation: A.S. Kline, © 2004.

ostia contigerat, qua se Tiberinus in altum
dividit et campo liberiore natat:
omnis eques mixtaque gravis cum plebe senatus
obvius ad Tusci fluminis ora venit.
[295] procedunt pariter matres nataeque nurusque
quaeque colunt sanctos virginitate focos.
sedula fune viri contento bracchia lassant:
vix subit adversas hospita navis aquas.
sicca diu fuerat tellus, sitis usserat herbas:
[300] sedit limoso pressa carina vado.
quisquis adest operi, plus quam pro parte laborat,
adiuvat et fortes voce sonante manus:
illa velut medio stabilis sedet insula ponto;
attoniti monstro stantque paventque viri.
[305] Claudia Quinta genus Clauso referebat ab alto
(nec facies impar nobilitate fuit),
casta quidem, sed non et credita: rumor iniquus
laeserat, et falsi criminis acta rea est.
cultus et ornatis varie prodisse capillis
[310] obfuit ad rigidos promptaque lingua senes.
conscia mens recti famae mendacia risit,
sed nos in vitium credula turba sumus.
haec ubi castarum processit ab agmine matrum
et manibus puram fluminis hausit aquam,
[315] ter caput inrorat, ter tollit in aethera palmas
(quicumque aspiciunt, mente carere putant),
summissoque genu voltus in imagine divae
figit, et hos edit crine iacente sonos:
"supplicis, alma, tuae, genetrix fecunda deorum,
[320] accipe sub certa condicione preces.
casta negor: si tu damnas, meruisse fatebor;
morte luam poenas iudice victa dea;
sed si crimen abest, tu nostrae pignora vitae
re dabis, et castas casta sequere manus."
[325] dixit, et exiguo funem conamine traxit;
mira, sed et scaena testificata loquar:
mota dea est, sequiturque ducem laudatque sequendo;
index laetitiae fertur ad astra sonus.
fluminis ad flexum veniunt (Tiberina priores
[330] Atria dixerunt), unde sinister abit.
nox aderat: querno religant in stipite funem,
dantque levi somno corpora functa cibo.
lux aderat: querno solvunt a stipite funem,
ante tamen posito tura dedere foco,
[335] ante coronarunt puppem, sine labe iuvencam
mactarunt operum coniugiique rudem.
est locus, in Tiberim qua lubricus influit Almo
et nomen magno perdit in amne minor.
illic purpurea canus cum veste sacerdos
[340] Almonis dominam sacraque lavit aquis.
exululant comites, furiosaque tibia flatur,
et feriunt molles taurea terga manus.
Claudia praecedit laeto celeberrima voltu,
credita vix tandem teste pudica dea;
[345] ipsa sedens plaustro porta est invecta Capena:
sparguntur iunctae flore recente boves.
Nasica accepit; templi non perstitit auctor:
Augustus nunc est, ante Metellus erat.

Valete,
Julia
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66620 From: PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@aol.com Date: 2009-06-10
Subject: Re: Intercessio
Aurelianus Cato sal.

I certainly have no wish to be at loggerheads with you.  I have no problem with anyone disagreeing with the intercessio of Agrippa or my agreeing with it or the other three tribunes abstaining.  I have no problem with the citizens of Nova Roma calling it illegal, unlawful, invalid, Tom, Dick, or Harry.

I do expect everyone to abide by it.  I expect the Consuls to begin to arrange a new election for Censor.  I expect Modianus knows that he will not be Censor but if he still wants it, he can run at the end of Paulinus' term.

I expect blood, sweat, tears, ingratitude, insults, and worse.  I expect this because I have been a Tribune before now.

I also would prefer not to invoke the penalties of the lex Didia Gemina on any citizen or magistrate so unwise as not to abide by the intercessio, interfere with the duties of the Tribunes, or offer violence to any Tribune.

Have a nice day. 


-----Original Message-----
From: l.coruncanius_cato@...
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 6:11 pm
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Intercessio



L. Coruncanius Cato Fl. Galerio Aureliano Tribunus Plebis SPD

With all due respect:

My point of view is that placing an intercessio on an electoral result, after the election is decided, is something against the will of the people assembled on the Comitia Centuriata, so it is unlawful and illegal. You (all tribunes) had plenty of time to veto one of the candidacies, but you choose not to say nothing, and now you make a movement that can be seen as a try to overturn a decision taken by all citizens of NR. And Tribunes are not a figure for overturning a decision taken by all cives of NR. They are suposed to defend them! That's the reason for my post.

And now I see you take this very reasoning, doing things within time, to avoid an invalid intercessio being rejected. Sorry, but what is written is written and means what it means, and you can not lecture anybody to read and understand a law and a constitution when you seem not to be aware of and not willing to comply with them. Even when the Tribunes are sacrosanct, they are not beyond the law.

Agrippa was wrong earlier, you are wrong now. Again, I don't think these words are an interference to a Tribune official action, neither harming any Tribune, and much less refusing to abide by the legal exercise of intercessio.

As a plebeian citizen, and Magistrate of NR, I must speak t o those suposed to defend my rights and those of all cives of NR. I said that in my election statements, and this is what I am doing, and will keep doing. If now you consider that you must apply Summa Coercendi Potestas, it's up to you, I will accept your decision. But I will not be silent when I see things getting done in the wrong way.

Despite all, I am glad to know about your support on the past election, and I thank you. I also hope that disagreeing on this point does not stop any posible relation in the future.

Di te incolumem custodiant.
--
L. Coruncanius Cato
Aedilis Curulis
Scriba Consulis Hispaniae

--- El mié, 10/6/09, PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@ aol.com <PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@ aol.com> escribió:

De: PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@ aol.com <PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@ aol.com>
Asunto: Re: [Nova-Roma] Intercessio
Para: Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com
Fecha: miércoles, 10 junio, 2009 4:20

Fl. Galerius Aurelianus Tribunus Plebis L.Coruncanius Cato sal.

It is one thing to point out that a Tribune has not followed the specifics of a law about the proper application of the Lex Labiena de intercessione and/or the Lex Didia Gemina de potestate tribunicia so as to insure that an intercessio will stand.  However, it is quite another thing when you state that a properly applied intercessio is illegal.  Every citizen has the right to20state that they do not agree with an intercessio and ask that the Tribune withdraw it.  Every citizen has the right to point out their opinion about why an intercessio is not worded well or why they believe it is not in accordance with a specific law.  NO ONE has the right to interfere with the official action of a Tribunus Plebis, do violence to a Tribunus Plebis in the course of his or her official duties, or refuse to abide by the legal exercise of intercessio.

If you want to continue to act and think and say what you will, do so.  I stated that you were dangerously close to violating a certain portion of the Lex Didia Gemina de potestate tribunicia.    

I supported you in the last election because I felt that you had a decent grasp of our Constitution and by-laws.  I recommend that you study the laws that are specific to the office of tribune to avoid any unfortunate results.

Vale.


-----Original Message-----
From: l.coruncanius_ cato@yahoo. com
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps. com
Sent: Tue, 9 Jun 2009 1:48 pm
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Intercessio



L. Coruncanius Cato Galerio Aureliano Tribunus Plebis SPD,

Sorry if saying w hat I think is viewed as "interfering with the official action of a Tribunus Plebis".

I said what I thought, and still think, and I will not step back. I must advise you about the last message from Equitius Cato, who told your cousin and also Tribune his intercessio is not valid, IMHO, it should be considered an interference to a Tribune's action, and sensitive of applying the full wheight of Summa Coercendi Potestas.

I humbly ask you to read some further messages of mine, when I state clearly that all Tribunes have their own mind and must act on their own will. I don't believe this is interfering with a Tribunus action. As I said during the contio in april, I abide the law.
But I ask you too to not place words I have not said in my mouth and after issue a threat like this, because I will defend my self.

Di vos incolumem custodiant.
--
L. Coruncanius Ca to
Aedilis Curulis
Scriba Consulis Hispaniae

--- El lun, 8/6/09, PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@ aol.com <PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@ aol.com> escribió:

De: PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@ aol.com <PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@ aol.com>
Asunto: Re: [Nova-Roma] Intercessio
Para: Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com
Fecha: lunes, 8 junio, 2009 7:43

Fl. Galerius Aurelianus Tribunus Plebis L. Coruncanio Cato. sal.

Your message comes dangerously close to violating certain sections of the Consitution and the lex20Dida Genima de potestate tribunicia could be applied.  I recommend that you withdraw the statement and rephrase it with terms such as "in your opinion."  If you continue to interfere with the official action of a Tribunus Plebis, I will bring the weight of the Summa Coercendi Potestas against you.  The same applies to any other citizen who interferes with the official action of a Tribunus Plebis.

Vale.



-----Original Message-----
From: Lucius Coruncanius Cato <l.coruncanius_ cato@yahoo. com>
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com
Sent: Mon, 8 Jun 2009 4:56 am
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Intercessio



L. Coruncanius Cato omn. spd,

I am with you, Venator, in this statement. Time for vetoing the candidacy ended with the contio. Now it is time to move forward. This intercesio is not only unlawful, as it comes long past the 72h period, but a very dangerous movement, as it is a long step backwards and sets up a preced ent for those who doesn't like the results of an election. One might not like the results, but trying to overturn them by veto is really antidemocratic, and those gestures are only seen in places where the voice of citizens or members means less than wet paper.

I also agree with the needing of rewriting=2 0some of the laws involved in this election, to make them pristine clear, with words stating what they intend to mean, and permitting no interpretation. I sent a proposal to the Law Review commitee on those leges, which has been ignored by most of those who complain about the meaning and interpretation of those laws.

This shows, to me, that these actions and wills from those persons are not for the better of NR, but an intent to bring down all what has been accomplished for the last 11 years. I know coexistence is hard sometimes, but we have to carry on with it. And Venator shows this spirit by not resigning when he does not like something, and by the will to be part of the solution, and not of the problem.

I too ask for the tribunes to block this intercessio, even when it is not legal and should not be placed, and I humbly ask you, tribune Agrippa, to think about20what you are doing, why yo do it, and what are the effects.

Di vos incolumem custodiant.

--
L. Coruncanius Cato
Aedilis Curulis
Scriba Consulis Hispaniae

--- El dom, 7/6/09, Publius Ullerius Stephanus Venator <famila.ulleria. venii@gmail. com> escri bió:

De: Publius Ullerius Stephanus Venator <famila.ulleria. venii@gmail. com>
Asunto: Re: [Nova-Roma] Intercessio
Para: Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com
Fecha: domingo, 7 junio, 2009 7:11

Ave te Omnes;

I ask the other tribunes, as a long time Cives Nova Roma, to help
things move along by opposing this Intercession.

I was a voice, albeit a fairly quiet one, in opposition to the
candidacy of Modianus for Censor.

I still believe the Law under which his candidacy was touted as legal
and opposed as illegal is poorly written and too open to
interpretation. Our Laws need clarity, brevity and simplicity. Law
must not only be for the lawyers, it must be primarily for the
understanding by and protection of the People.

We must needs not try and cover every situation; having macronational
law, statute and regulation, which supersedes what we do here.

However, the Vox Populi has been heard, and is that not the true
foundation of any Res Publica? If the People do not contest the
legitimacy of a Law, it stands.

The majo rity of the People, by their resounding silence, also lent
tacit approval to the candidacy of Modianus. This intercession is, in
my opinion, an ex post facto attempt at what should have been resolved
during the discussion before the Cista opened.

By the vote count and tally, Modianus has the confidence of a majority
of the members of the Centuries.

Yes, this note has an air of resignation about it; what's done is
done, que sera, sera.

There are problems, which need to be addressed, and I will try better
to be a part of the solution. I am not considering l eaving, neither
the Senate, the Lictorship nor Nova Roma, though I will step back from
committee and scribal appointments to ponder things. (...and, yes, I
realize I'd already been a bit withdrawn in those arenas already.) I
need time to think.

To my friends herein, I know this is unexpected, but did you really
see something different coming, in light of my nature?

I have made no enemies in Nova Roma, though there are a few who I find
useless to the future of our endeavor. I shall no longer respond to
them, neither directly nor indirectly, neither here nor elsewhere.

In closing, I ask again that the other Tribunes block this
Intercession and be more proactive in the future.

============ ========= ========= ========= ==
In amicitia et fides -
Publius Ullerius Stephanus Venator
Ci vis circa Quintilis MMDCCLI a.u.c.
Senator et Lictor

Religio Septentrionalis - Poeta
------------ --------- --------- ---
May the Holy Powers smile on our efforts.
May the Spirits of our family lines nod in approval.
May we be of Worth to our fellow Nova Romans.



Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66621 From: Maior Date: 2009-06-10
Subject: Re: Intercessio
-Maior Aureliano spd:
there was no veto, when I was tribune of the plebs every single word had to be correct or it will fail. Agrippa's which you seconded was deficient on its face, so there is absolutely no call for an election.

This has been the mos of Nova Roma since I joined in 2003. I really don't understand you. If you want to post a veto, it has to be correct otherwise it is INVALID.

One of the reasons for it being particular is to prevent ABUSE: "I veto M. Cornelius Cicero for being a bad praetor." Well now you say ' sorry I meant L. Curius Cicero..' do you see the terrible problems there? And as for breaking laws if you are indefinite, well then the tribunes have the powers of a tyrant!

I really don't know what you imagine your powers are.. But I suggest you write to Cordus.

There is no veto, I won't agree to tyranny, so you can threaten all you want. I won't touch your person, but I won't and no one else in Nova Roma need obey a tyrant who doesn't have the law supporting his actions.
There has been a lot of talk of 'following the law' in Nova Roma; this is the reality. If the outcome displeases you, that's tough. The consul Complutensis warned you that the veto was invalid, and yes in macro life he is a lawyer, and understands the law very well.

vale
M. Hortensia Maior
Senatrix
former:
Questrix
Aedilis Plebis
Tribune of the Plebs
scriba Censoribus K.F.B Q
and K.F.B.Q. M


>
> Aurelianus Cato sal.
>
> I certainly have no wish to be at loggerheads with you.  I have no problem with anyone disagreeing with the intercessio of Agrippa or my agreeing with it or the other three tribunes abstaining.  I have no problem with the citizens of Nova Roma calling it illegal, unlawful, invalid, Tom, Dick, or Harry.
>
> I do expect everyone to abide by it.  I expect the Consuls to begin to arrange a new election for Censor.  I expect Modianus knows that he will not be Censor but if he still wants it, he can run at the end of Paulinus' term.
>
> I expect blood, sweat, tears, ingratitude, insults, and worse.  I expect this because I have been a Tribune before now.
>
> I also would prefer not to invoke the penalties of the lex Didia Gemina on any citizen or magistrate so unwise as not to abide by the intercessio, interfere with the duties of the Tribunes, or offer violence to any Tribune.
>
> Have a nice day. 
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: l.coruncanius_cato@...
> To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 6:11 pm
> Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Intercessio
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> L. Coruncanius Cato Fl. Galerio Aureliano Tribunus Plebis SPD
>
> With all due respect:
>
> My point of view is that placing an intercessio on an electoral result, after the election is decided, is something against the will of the people assembled on the Comitia Centuriata, so it is unlawful and illegal. You (all tribunes) had plenty of time to veto one of the candidacies, but y
> ou choose not to say nothing, and now you make a movement that can be seen as a try to overturn a decision taken by all citizens of NR. And Tribunes are not a figure for overturning a decision taken by all cives of NR. They are suposed to defend them! That's the reason for my post.
>
> And now I see you take this very reasoning, doing things within time, to avoid an invalid intercessio being rejected. Sorry, but what is written is written and means what it means, and you can not lecture anybody to read and understand a law and a constitution when you seem not to be aware of and not willing to comply with them. Even when the Tribunes are sacrosanct, they are not beyond the law.
>
> Agrippa was wrong earlier, you are wrong now. Again, I don't think these words are an interference to a Tribune official action, neither harming any Tribune, and much less refusing to abide by the legal exercise of intercessio.
>
> As a plebeian citizen, and Magistrate of NR, I must speak to those suposed to defend my rights and those of all cives of NR. I said that in my election statements, and this is what I am doing, and will keep doing. If now you consider that you must apply Summa Coercendi Potestas, it's up to you, I will accept your decision. But I will not be silent when I see things getting done in the wrong way.
>
> Despite all, I am glad to know about your support on the past election, and I thank you. I also hope that disagreeing on this point does not stop any posible rela
> tion in the future.
>
> Di te incolumem custodiant.
> --
> L. Coruncanius Cato
> Aedilis Curulis
> Scriba Consulis Hispaniae
>
> --- El mié, 10/6/09, PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@... <PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@...> escribió:
>
>
> De: PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@... <PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@...>
> Asunto: Re: [Nova-Roma] Intercessio
> Para: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> Fecha: miércoles, 10 junio, 2009 4:20
>
>
>
>
> Fl. Galerius Aurelianus Tribunus Plebis L.Coruncanius Cato sal.
>
> It is one thing to point out that a Tribune has not followed the specifics of a law about the proper application of the Lex Labiena de intercessione and/or the Lex Didia Gemina de potestate tribunicia so as to insure that an intercessio will stand.  However, it is quite another thing when you state that a properly applied intercessio is illegal.  Every citizen has the right to state that they do not agree with an intercessio and ask that the Tribune withdraw it.  Every citizen has the right to point out their opinion about why an intercessio is not worded well or why they believe it is not in accordance with a specific law.  NO ONE has the right to interfere with the official action of a Tribunus Plebis, do violence to a Tribunus Plebis in the course of his or her official duties, or refuse to abide by the legal exercise of intercessio.
>
> If you want to continue to act and think and say what you will, do so.  I stated that you were dangerously close to violating a certain portion of the Lex Didia Gemina de potestate tribunicia.    
>
> I suppor
> ted you in the last election because I felt that you had a decent grasp of our Constitution and by-laws.  I recommend that you study the laws that are specific to the office of tribune to avoid any unfortunate results.
>
> Vale.
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: l.coruncanius_ cato@yahoo. com
> To: Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps. com
> Sent: Tue, 9 Jun 2009 1:48 pm
> Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Intercessio
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> L. Coruncanius Cato Galerio Aureliano Tribunus Plebis SPD,
>
> Sorry if saying what I think is viewed as "interfering with the official action of a Tribunus Plebis".
>
> I said what I thought, and still think, and I will not step back. I must advise you about the last message from Equitius Cato, who told your cousin and also Tribune his intercessio is not valid, IMHO, it should be considered an interference to a Tribune's action, and sensitive of applying the full wheight of Summa Coercendi Potestas.
>
> I humbly ask you to read some further messages of mine, when I state clearly that all Tribunes have their own mind and must act on their own will. I don't believe this is interfering with a Tribunus action. As I said during the contio in april, I abide the law.
> But I ask you too to not place words I have not said in my mouth and after issue a threat like this, because I will defend my self.
>
> Di vos incolumem custodiant.
> --
> L. Coruncanius Ca to
> Aedilis Curulis
> Scriba Consulis Hispaniae
>
> --- El lun, 8/6/09, PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@ aol.com <PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@ aol.com> escribió:
>
>
> De:=2
> 0PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@ aol.com <PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@ aol.com>
> Asunto: Re: [Nova-Roma] Intercessio
> Para: Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com
> Fecha: lunes, 8 junio, 2009 7:43
>
>
>
>
> Fl. Galerius Aurelianus Tribunus Plebis L. Coruncanio Cato. sal.
>
> Your message comes dangerously close to violating certain sections of the Consitution and the lex Dida Genima de potestate tribunicia could be applied.  I recommend that you withdraw the statement and rephrase it with terms such as "in your opinion."  If you continue to interfere with the official action of a Tribunus Plebis, I will bring the weight of the Summa Coercendi Potestas against you.  The same applies to any other citizen who interferes with the official action of a Tribunus Plebis.
>
> Vale.
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Lucius Coruncanius Cato <l.coruncanius_ cato@yahoo. com>
> To: Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com
> Sent: Mon, 8 Jun 2009 4:56 am
> Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Intercessio
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> L. Coruncanius Cato omn. spd,
>
> I am with you, Venator, in this statement. Time for vetoing the candidacy ended with the contio. Now it is time to move forward. This intercesio is not only unlawful, as it comes long past the 72h period, but a very dangerous movement, as it is a long step backwards and sets up a preced ent for those who doesn't like the results of an election. One might not like the results, but trying to overturn them by veto is really antidemocratic, and those gestures are only seen in places where the voice of citizens or members means less than wet=2
> 0paper.
>
> I also agree with the needing of rewriting some of the laws involved in this election, to make them pristine clear, with words stating what they intend to mean, and permitting no interpretation. I sent a proposal to the Law Review commitee on those leges, which has been ignored by most of those who complain about the meaning and interpretation of those laws.
>
> This shows, to me, that these actions and wills from those persons are not for the better of NR, but an intent to bring down all what has been accomplished for the last 11 years. I know coexistence is hard sometimes, but we have to carry on with it. And Venator shows this spirit by not resigning when he does not like something, and by the will to be part of the solution, and not of the problem.
>
> I too ask for the tribunes to block this intercessio, even when it is not legal and should not be placed, and I humbly ask you, tribune Agrippa, to think about20what you are doing, why yo do it, and what are the effects.
>
> Di vos incolumem custodiant.
>
> --
> L. Coruncanius Cato
> Aedilis Curulis
> Scriba Consulis Hispaniae
>
> --- El dom, 7/6/09, Publius Ullerius Stephanus Venator <famila.ulleria. venii@gmail. com> escri bió:
>
>
> De: Publius Ullerius Stephanus Venator <famila.ulleria. venii@gmail. com>
> Asunto: Re: [Nova-Roma] Intercessio
> Para: Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com
> Fecha: domingo, 7 junio, 2009 7:11
>
>
>
>
> Avete Omnes;
>
> I ask the other tribunes, as a long time Cives Nova Roma, to help
> things move along by opposing this Intercession.
> 0AI was a voice, albeit a fairly quiet one, in opposition to the
> candidacy of Modianus for Censor.
>
> I still believe the Law under which his candidacy was touted as legal
> and opposed as illegal is poorly written and too open to
> interpretation. Our Laws need clarity, brevity and simplicity. Law
> must not only be for the lawyers, it must be primarily for the
> understanding by and protection of the People.
>
> We must needs not try and cover every situation; having macronational
> law, statute and regulation, which supersedes what we do here.
>
> However, the Vox Populi has been heard, and is that not the true
> foundation of any Res Publica? If the People do not contest the
> legitimacy of a Law, it stands.
>
> The majo rity of the People, by their resounding silence, also lent
> tacit approval to the candidacy of Modianus. This intercession is, in
> my opinion, an ex post facto attempt at what should have been resolved
> during the discussion before the Cista opened.
>
> By the vote count and tally, Modianus has the confidence of a majority
> of the members of the Centuries.
>
> Yes, this note has an air of resignation about it; what's done is
> done, que sera, sera.
>
> There are problems, which need to be addressed, and I will try better
> to be a part of the solution. I am not considering leaving, neither
> the Senate, the Lictorship nor Nova Roma, though I will step back from
> committee and scribal appointments to ponder things. (...and, yes, I
> realize I'd already been a bit withdrawn in those arenas already.) I
> need t
> ime to think.
>
> To my friends herein, I know this is unexpected, but did you really
> see something different coming, in light of my nature?
>
> I have made no enemies in Nova Roma, though there are a few who I find
> useless to the future of our endeavor. I shall no longer respond to
> them, neither directly nor indirectly, neither here nor elsewhere.
>
> In closing, I ask again that the other Tribunes block this
> Intercession and be more proactive in the future.
>
> ============ ========= ========= ========= ==
> In amicitia et fides -
> Publius Ullerius Stephanus Venator
> Ci vis circa Quintilis MMDCCLI a.u.c.
> Senator et Lictor
>
> Religio Septentrionalis - Poeta
> ------------ --------- --------- ---
> May the Holy Powers smile on our efforts.
> May the Spirits of our family lines nod in approval.
> May we be of Worth to our fellow Nova Romans.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> An Excellent Credit Score is 750. See Yours in Just 2 Easy Steps!
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Dell Inspiron 15 Laptop: Now in 6 vibrant colors! Shop Dell's full line of laptops.
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66622 From: Maior Date: 2009-06-10
Subject: Re: Intercessio
M.Hortensia Catoni Corucanique spd;
may I remind you Cato, that this is the first time a tribune of the plebs tried to veto (it failed) an election. Since the Constitution is silent in this regard, it is the agreed tradition of Nova Roma, and Cordus helped us formulate this, then the ways of Republican Rome control.

Since the Constitution is silent about vetoing elections, and there is no precedent in Nova Roma (for good reason!) the mos of Republican Rome control: as Cordus said once the Comitia met in Republican Rome to vote,

"with the comitial process itself: it was forbidden to veto the comitial process after voting had actually been set in motion. This being so, it was of course totally out of the question to veto the result of a vote after the voting had finished."

I realize Cato you couldn't care less about the gods, Roman mos or about our history and culture. But for everyone else on our front webpage it says:
" Dedicated to the restoration of classical Roman religion, culture and virtues"

let us worship the gods with reverence and follow the mos of our ancestors!
May the gods favour Nova Roma!
Marca Hortensia Maior

>
> As to Cordus' information, I once again remind us that we operate not under ancient Roman law but under Nova Roman law. The ancient Romans did not even have a written, supreme constitutional document; does this mean we should ignore our Constitution? If we do not like this, we need to change the law - our law. Until we do so, we abide by our law.
>
> Vale,
>
> Cato
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66623 From: Steve Moore Date: 2009-06-10
Subject: Vesta in the Stars

M. Valerius Potitus omnibus SPD.

 

Atque angusta fovet Capricorni sidera Vesta.

Vesta cherishes the cramped stars of Capricorn.

 

Vesta tuos, Capricorne, fove penetralibus ignes:

Hinc artes studiumque trahis.

In her shrine Vesta tends your fires, Capricorn;

And from her you derive your skills and callings.

 

--Manilius, “Astronomica”, II.445 and IV.243-244

 

Vesta mater, fave nos.

 

Valete,

Potitus

 

 

 

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66624 From: Gaius Petronius Dexter Date: 2009-06-10
Subject: Re: Intercessio
C. Petronius C. Catoni s.p.d.,

> So they do have the power to veto laws passed in the comitia - which is the voice of the will of the People.

Only if the Constitution, edicta, decreta, SC or leges are violated.

This intercessio comes about what violation? Where the Constitution is it violated, where the laws, edicts, decrets or SC? If a law is not clear, and if it is clear that the word "consecutive" does not concern the election of Modianus, what is about this intercessio?

Vale.
C. Petronius Dexter
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66625 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2009-06-10
Subject: Re: Intercessio
Cato Maiori sal.

Salve!

Repeating Cordus' words does not make them override Nova Roman law. We do not follow an "agreed tradition", we follow the law.

Vale,

Cato



--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Maior" <rory12001@...> wrote:
>
> M.Hortensia Catoni Corucanique spd;
> may I remind you Cato, that this is the first time a tribune of the plebs tried to veto (it failed) an election. Since the Constitution is silent in this regard, it is the agreed tradition of Nova Roma, and Cordus helped us formulate this, then the ways of Republican Rome control.
>
> Since the Constitution is silent about vetoing elections, and there is no precedent in Nova Roma (for good reason!) the mos of Republican Rome control: as Cordus said once the Comitia met in Republican Rome to vote,
>
> "with the comitial process itself: it was forbidden to veto the comitial process after voting had actually been set in motion. This being so, it was of course totally out of the question to veto the result of a vote after the voting had finished."
>
> I realize Cato you couldn't care less about the gods, Roman mos or about our history and culture. But for everyone else on our front webpage it says:
> " Dedicated to the restoration of classical Roman religion, culture and virtues"
>
> let us worship the gods with reverence and follow the mos of our ancestors!
> May the gods favour Nova Roma!
> Marca Hortensia Maior
>
> >
> > As to Cordus' information, I once again remind us that we operate not under ancient Roman law but under Nova Roman law. The ancient Romans did not even have a written, supreme constitutional document; does this mean we should ignore our Constitution? If we do not like this, we need to change the law - our law. Until we do so, we abide by our law.
> >
> > Vale,
> >
> > Cato
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66626 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2009-06-10
Subject: Re: Intercessio
Cato Petronio extero sal.

Salve.

Perhaps you should first read the intercessio; every one of your questions is answered within it.

Vale,

Cato



--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Gaius Petronius Dexter" <jfarnoud94@...> wrote:
>
> C. Petronius C. Catoni s.p.d.,
>
> > So they do have the power to veto laws passed in the comitia - which is the voice of the will of the People.
>
> Only if the Constitution, edicta, decreta, SC or leges are violated.
>
> This intercessio comes about what violation? Where the Constitution is it violated, where the laws, edicts, decrets or SC? If a law is not clear, and if it is clear that the word "consecutive" does not concern the election of Modianus, what is about this intercessio?
>
> Vale.
> C. Petronius Dexter
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66628 From: Shoshana Hathaway Date: 2009-06-11
Subject: Re: Classic Poetry, Prose, Proems
Salve, Julia Aquila, et salvete omnes,


It is truly delightful to be reminded, in such a beautiful way, of the
universality and timelessness of great poetry! How often have I felt like
this? Thank you, yet again!

vale et valete Bene,
C. Maria Caeca
----- Original Message -----
From: "L Julia Aquila" <dis_pensible@...>
To: <Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Wednesday, June 10, 2009 12:03 AM
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Classic Poetry, Prose, Proems


Salvete,

Ode To Sleep
Publius Papinius Statius (c.A.D. 45-c.A.D. 96)

Gentle divinity, how have I merited?
Whither, unfortunate wretch, have I strayed,
Thus of thy bounty to lie disenherited -
I alone whilst every other is paid?
Sleeping are cattle and birds without number,
Beasts of the wilderness rest in their lair;
Even the hills, as if weary, feign slumber,
Even the torment sighs soft in the air.

Lulled are the shuttering waves of the ocean,
Seas in the lap of the land lie at peace.
Only for me in monotonous motion
Day follows day, and there comes no release.

Moonlight & starlight & light of the morning
Seven times flit o'er my feverish cheek.
Once again Dawn's chilly hand offers warning.
Whither, oh whither for rest shall I seek?

Had I the eyes of an Argus, nor heeded
Ever to keep my whole body awake -
Half of the sentries alone being needed -
Still I could never my slumber-thirst slake.

Yet - if there's one in the arms of a lover
Scornful of sleep and the joy that sleep brings,
Come thou to me! I'll not ask thee to cover
My eyes with the fullest extant of thy wings

Happier suitors may sue for such blessing,
I'll beg a touch, be it ever so slight,
Of thy wand, or a whisk of thy garment caressing
My eyelids to droop as it crosses the night.




CRIMINE quo merui, iuuenis, placidissime diuum,
quoue errore miser, donis ut solus egerem,
Somne, tuis? tacet omne pecus uolucresque feraeque
et simulant fessos curuata cacumina somnos,
nec trucibus fluuiis idem sonus; occidit horror
aequoris, et terris maria acclinata quiescunt.
septima iam rediens Phoebe mihi respicit aegras
stare genas; totidem Oetaeae Paphiaeque reuisunt
lampades et totiens nostros Tithonia questus
praeterit et gelido parcit miserata flagello.
unde ego sufficiam? non si mihi lumina mille
quae uafer alterna tantum statione tenebat
Argus et haud umquam uigilabat corpore toto.
at nunc heu! si aliquis longa sub nocte puellae
bracchia nexa tenens ultro te, Somne, repellit,
inde ueni. nec te totas infundere pennas
luminibus compello meis (hoc turba precetur
laetior): extremo me tange cacumine uirgae
(sufficit) aut leuiter suspenso poplite transi.

Valete,
Julia



------------------------------------

Yahoo! Groups Links





--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 8.5.339 / Virus Database: 270.12.60/2166 - Release Date: 06/09/09
18:08:00
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66630 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2009-06-11
Subject: Re: Intercessio
Cato Maiori sal.

Salve.

You wrote (in part):

"They can't even give a reason; the Constitution doesn't permit an election to be vetoed. That must be enumerated, thus all the elements that follow an election: the reports etc of the custodes,consules announcing the election cannot be vetoed either."

Yes, they can. They are acts of a magistrate. They can, under *our* law, be vetoed. The Constitution you *just quoted* says they can.

You obviously do not understand what is being discussed. The election was not vetoed - and it cannot be, as an election is not the act of a magistrate. The certification (an act of a magistrate) and the acceptance (an act of a magistrate) were. Agrippa's veto certainly did mention specifically why he issued the veto. You just need to read it before jumping on someone else's bandwagon.

You also wrote:

"Cato, Gn. Iulius Caesar, Sulla, Agrippa and his friends doesn't know how to interpret the Constitution, issue a valid veto, nor do they have any interest in the leges and mos of Roma antiqua."

I have written several proposals for leges that would, in fact, bring us closer to the practice of the ancient Romans in many regards, both here and on the Consular Committee on Law List, so you need to be more careful about what you say, as it can be demonmstrated to be false. On that List, of which you are a member, you have posted twice - and one of those was a post telling the rest of us that the whole exercise was foolish. So much for your interest in bringing us closer to the "leges and mos of Roma antiqua [sic]."

By the way, I cannot issue an intercessio. I'm not a magistrate.

Vale,

Cato
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66631 From: Maior Date: 2009-06-11
Subject: Re: Intercessio
M. Hortensia G. Petronio Dextro spd;
here is Complutensis elegant summary of this entire dismal affair. Another example of ridiculous legal wrangling. Remember how I researched the Matralia and you were going to write a poem? Don't we have more productive ways to use our time?
vale in curam Matris Matuti
Maior

Complutensis summation:
Tribunus Plebis Gaius Vipsanius Agrippa has pronounced intercessio in name of the following citizens: Senator Gnaeus Iulius Caesar, Senator Lucius Cornelius Sulla Felix, Quintus Valerius Poplicola, and Marcus Valerius Potitus.

This pronouncement is according with the Lex Didia Gemina de potestate tribunicia II.A.1.a

Tribunus Plebis Gaius Vipsanius Agrippa has pronounced intercessio "against custodes Marcus Lucretius Agricola and Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus and against the consuls Marcus Iulius Severus and Marcus Cornelius Complutensis".

In accordance with the Lex Didia Gemina de potestate tribunicia II.A.1.b the intercessio of the Tribuni must include the official name and office of the magistrate(s) against whose act or acts the intercessio or auxilium has been interposed. The intercessio is invalid because one of the consuls is not member of Gens Cornelia.

In accordance with the Lex Didia Gemina de potestate tribunicia II.A.1.c the intercessio of the Tribuni must include the article(s) of the Constitution or the leges violated by the magistrate's act(s).

In accordance with the Lex Didia Gemina de potestate tribunicia II.A.2. if the intercessio of a Tribunus Plebis does not include these three elements, the intercessio shall be invalid.

The intercessio of the Tribuni Plebis is invali
>
> Salve.
>
> You wrote (in part):
>
> "They can't even give a reason; the Constitution doesn't permit an election to be vetoed. That must be enumerated, thus all the elements that follow an election: the reports etc of the custodes,consules announcing the election cannot be vetoed either."
>
> Yes, they can. They are acts of a magistrate. They can, under *our* law, be vetoed. The Constitution you *just quoted* says they can.
>
> You obviously do not understand what is being discussed. The election was not vetoed - and it cannot be, as an election is not the act of a magistrate. The certification (an act of a magistrate) and the acceptance (an act of a magistrate) were. Agrippa's veto certainly did mention specifically why he issued the veto. You just need to read it before jumping on someone else's bandwagon.
>
> You also wrote:
>
> "Cato, Gn. Iulius Caesar, Sulla, Agrippa and his friends doesn't know how to interpret the Constitution, issue a valid veto, nor do they have any interest in the leges and mos of Roma antiqua."
>
> I have written several proposals for leges that would, in fact, bring us closer to the practice of the ancient Romans in many regards, both here and on the Consular Committee on Law List, so you need to be more careful about what you say, as it can be demonmstrated to be false. On that List, of which you are a member, you have posted twice - and one of those was a post telling the rest of us that the whole exercise was foolish. So much for your interest in bringing us closer to the "leges and mos of Roma antiqua [sic]."
>
> By the way, I cannot issue an intercessio. I'm not a magistrate.
>
> Vale,
>
> Cato
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66632 From: Gaius Aurelius Vindex Date: 2009-06-11
Subject: [NR_Urbs] Nova Roma Italia al Festival Occidente - 26-28 giugno 209,
Attachments :

    www.novaroma.org.gif


    NOVA ROMA

    Italia



    KAINUA
    Festival Occidente
    26 - 28 Giugno 2009, Marzabotto

    p024_1_02.jpg  p024_1_23.jpg  p024_1_21.jpg


    Siamo lieti di annunciarvi che la sezione italiana di Nova Roma parteciperà ufficialmente alla prossima edizione di KAINUA, Festival Occidente che si terrà a Marzabotto (BO) dal 26 al  28 giugno 2009.

    Occidente nasce dall’esigenza di evidenziare i più interessanti e preziosi segni delle civiltà italiche ed occidentali consentendo di leggere il territorio con occhi nuovi e facendo soffermare davanti a particolari che spesso ci sfuggono.
    Tema portante di questa edizione di Occidente a Marzabotto è 
    “Le Radici della Nostra Terra”, che, oltre a permette di comprendere meglio la storia dell’integrazione tra l’uomo e l’ambiente nel suo contesto storico e conoscere le evoluzioni e le trasformazioni che si sono susseguite durante i secoli nella vita quotidiana, affronterà i temi della visione del mondo e di ciò che sta oltre tra gli antichi.
    Per permettere di vivere al meglio a tutti gli appassionati e i curiosi queste giornate, il lato della manifestazione più prettamente scientifico sarà affiancato da eventi di carattere divulgativo e ludico, come visite guidate ai musei ed aree archeologiche, giochi, riedizione degli sport antichi, concerti, ecc. Durante il festival sarà possibile visitare scavi ancora in esecuzione e cantieri archeologici, per consentire ai più esperti di capire il valore scientifico del sito. UnÂ’intera sezione sarà dedicata ai viaggi nei sapori dellÂ’antichità con degustazioni dei prodotti locali ed i particolari pranzi etruschi, mai rappresentati in un contesto di rievocazione storica utilizzando i piatti dellÂ’età antica riprodotti per l'occasione. Eventi clou di Occidente saranno le serate intrise di spettacoli che coinvolgeranno i visitatori, mentre a chiudere ci saranno gli appuntamenti notturni. Occidente organizzerà una mercato dei mestieri antichi con attività artigianali in loco e vendita dei prodotti.

    Nova Roma sarà presente con un banchetto storico, in collaborazione con l'Associazione Pomerium, dove saranno esposti il nuovo materiale di comunicazione e i nostri progetti per il futuro. 

    Chiunque voglia aiutarci nell'organizzazione del presidio novaromano al Festival Occidente con la propria presenza o con ulteriori approfondimenti da esporre, è invitato a contattare al più presto Gaius Aurelius Vindex all'indirizzo e-mail g_a_vindex@yahoo. it (g_a_vindex @ yahoo.it)

    Per tutti gli altri l'invito è a venirci a trovare a Marzabotto l'ultimo week-end di giugno, per bere insieme un bicchiere di vino e discutere amabilmente del nostro amore per Roma Antica. Per ulteriori informazioni sul festival visitate www.festivalocciden te.it

    Vi aspettiamo numerosi!!!


    Nova Roma Italia



    Animazioni GRATUITE per le tue e-mail - da IncrediMail! Fai clic qui!
    Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66633 From: marcushoratius Date: 2009-06-11
    Subject: a. d. III Eidus Iuniae: Matralia; Mater Matuta
    M. Moravius Piscinus cultoribus Deorum et omnibus salutem plurimam dicit: Dea vos porrigat opitula.

    Hodie est ante diem III Eidus Iuniae; haec dies nefastus est: Venatio Ludi Saeculares; Vestalia; Matralia Matri Matutae in Foro Boario

    447 Years before the Founding of Rome /1200 BCE (or 1184 BCE): The Fall of Troy and the escape of Aeneas with his father and son, but with the loss of his wife Creusa at the Temple of Ceres outside Ilium

    AUC 736 / 17 BCE: The eleventh day of the Ludi Saeculares was celebrated with an animal hunt (venatio).


    Matralia

    Matuta disperses the rosey dawn and spreads the golden sunlight across the sky. ~ T. Lucretius Carus, De Rerum Natura 5.654-655

    Mater Matuta's name, according to Verrius Flaccus, derived from an old Latin word meaning "good," as did such words as mane, manes, manus, and maturus (Paulus 122). She was a Goddess of the first light, as Janus Matutus is also a God of the rising sun. A euphemism for birth is "coming into the light." This idea is found, too, in the names of Diana Lucina and Juno Lucina. The Romans considered dawn to be the luckiest of times to be born, and this idea of a lucky birth at dawn is the meaning of Lucius/Lucia and Manius (Mommsen, Roman History 1.162)

    A fanum for Mater Matuta was said to have been dedicated by Servius Tullius in the Forum Boarium. There, too, he had dedicated a Temple of Fortuna Virgo. For the 11 June, Ovid tells the tale of the miraculous conception of Servius Tullius when his mother Ocresia of Corniculum poured a libation of wine, along with Tanaquil, on the hearth, the ashes rose to form the phallus of Volcanus, onto which Tanaquil told Ocresia to sit. In another version it is a spark of Volcanus that falls from the fire into Ocresia's lap, thereby impregnating her. In its own way, this story also relates to Matuta as the Goddess who united mortal woman with immortal. By 396 BCE a Temple of Mater Matuta was built next to the Temple of Fortuna Virgo, after a vow by L. Furius Camillus during the Veientine War. The Matralia celebrates the dedication of this later Temple of Matuta. As a Good Goddess of Birthing we might expect that the Matralia involved matrons, as it did, and would have something to do with children. But there were a couple of odd features to it. First is how slave women were forbidden into the temple.

    Plutarch, Roman Questions 16:

    "Why is it that it is forbidden to slave women to set foot in the shrine of Matuta, and why do the women bring in one slave woman only and slap her on the head and beat her? Is the beating of this slave but a symbol of the prohibition, and do they prevent the others from entering because of the legend? For Ino is said to have become madly jealous of a slave woman on her husband's account, and to have vented her madness on her son. The Greeks relate that the slave was an Aetolian by birth and her name was Antiphera. Wherefore also in my native town, Chaeroneia, the temple guardian stands before the precinct of Leucothera and, taking a whip in his hand, makes proclamation: 'Let no slave enter, nor any Aetolian, man or woman!'"

    And then there is an unexpected and unexplained feature of this festival:

    Plutarch, Roman Questions 17:

    "Why is it that in the shrine of this Goddess Mater Matuta they do not pray for blessings on their own children, but only on their sisters' children? Is it because Ino was fond of her sister and suckled her sister's son also, but was herself unfortunate in her own children? Or is it that, quite apart from this reason, the custom is morally excellent and produces much good will among kindred?"

    The worship of Mater Matuta was widespread in Central Italy, and quite ancient. She is found at Pisarum in two very ancient inscriptions. One is a truncated square column, with Her name, in archaic letters, written around one corner so that it extends across two sides as MAT(er) M – ATUT(a). She appear at Pyrgi, the port of Caere in Etruria, and at Praeneste in Latium, among the Volsci of southern Latium, and down into Campania as well. At Satricum Mater Matuta appears to have been the main deity. Livy recorded a miraculous story about her at the time of Satricum's destruction.

    AUC 376 /377 BCE: Mater Matuta and the sack of Satricum

    "The exasperation and rage of the Latins at finding themselves unable to injure the Romans in war or to induce the Volscians to keep up hostilities rose to such a pitch that they set fire to Satricum, which had been their first shelter after their defeat. They flung firebrands on sacred and profane buildings alike, and not a single roof of that city escaped except the temple of Mother Matuta. It is stated that it was not any religious scruple or fear of the gods that restrained them, but an awful Voice which sounded from the temple threatening them with terrible punishment if they did not keep their accursed firebrands far from the shrine." ~ Titus Livius 6.33.4


    Our thought for today comes from the Golden Sayings of Pythagoras 11-12:

    "Do nothing evil, neither in the presence of others, nor privately; but above all things respect thyself."
    Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66634 From: Paco Benitez Aguilar Date: 2009-06-11
    Subject: Re: [NR_Urbs] Nova Roma Italia al Festival Occidente - 26-28 giugno
    Attachments :
      Thanks! Grazie! Merci!
      Send mail to:

       
      ****************************************************************

      Paco Benítez - Aguilar
      Guiones para Cine - Teatro - Televisión - Internet

      Ven a mi Factoría de Sueños
      Miembro de Screenwriters Federation of America



      De: Gaius Aurelius Vindex <g_a_vindex@yahoo.it>
      Para: pomerium@yahoogroups.com
      CC: Cohors_Consularis@yahoogroups.com; nova-roma@yahoogroups.com; novaroma_europe@yahoogroups.com; novaromaeurope@yahoogroups.com; NR_Urbs@yahoogroups.com; romaeterna@yahoogroups.com; Curia@yahoo.com
      Enviado: jueves, 11 de junio, 2009 10:25:46
      Asunto: [Nova-Roma] [NR_Urbs] Nova Roma Italia al Festival Occidente - 26-28 giugno 209, Marzabotto (BO)

      www.novaroma.org.gif


      NOVA ROMA

      Italia



      KAINUA
      Festival Occidente
      26 - 28 Giugno 2009, Marzabotto

      p024_1_02.jpg  p024_1_23.jpg  p024_1_21.jpg


      Siamo lieti di annunciarvi che la sezione italiana di Nova Roma parteciperà ufficialmente alla prossima edizione di KAINUA, Festival Occidente che si terrà a Marzabotto (BO) dal 26 al  28 giugno 2009.

      Occidente nasce dall’esigenza di evidenziare i più interessanti e preziosi segni delle civiltà italiche ed occidentali consentendo di leggere il territorio con occhi nuovi e facendo soffermare davanti a particolari che spesso ci sfuggono.
      Tema portante di questa edizione di Occidente a Marzabotto è 
      “Le Radici della Nostra Terra”, che, oltre a permette di comprendere meglio la storia dell’integrazione tra l’uomo e l’ambiente nel suo contesto storico e conoscere le evoluzioni e le trasformazioni che si sono susseguite durante i secoli nella vita quotidiana, affronterà i temi della visione del mondo e di ciò che sta oltre tra gli antichi.
      Per permettere di vivere al meglio a tutti gli appassionati e i curiosi queste giornate, il lato della manifestazione più prettamente scientifico sarà affiancato da eventi di carattere divulgativo e ludico, come visite guidate ai musei ed aree archeologiche, giochi, riedizione degli sport antichi, concerti, ecc. Durante il festival sarà possibile visitare scavi ancora in esecuzione e cantieri archeologici, per consentire ai più esperti di capire il valore scientifico del sito. Un’intera sezione sarà dedicata ai viaggi nei sapori dell’antichità con degustazioni dei prodotti locali ed i particolari pranzi etruschi, mai rappresentati in un contesto di rievocazione storica utilizzando i piatti dell’età antica riprodotti per l'occasione. Eventi clou di Occidente saranno le serate intrise di spettacoli che coinvolgeranno i visitatori, mentre a chiudere ci saranno gli appuntamenti notturni. Occidente organizzerà una mercato dei mestieri antichi con attività artigianali in loco e vendita dei prodotti.

      Nova Roma sarà presente con un banchetto storico, in collaborazione con l'Associazione Pomerium, dove saranno esposti il nuovo materiale di comunicazione e i nostri progetti per il futuro. 

      Chiunque voglia aiutarci nell'organizzazione del presidio novaromano al Festival Occidente con la propria presenza o con ulteriori approfondimenti da esporre, è invitato a contattare al più presto Gaius Aurelius Vindex all'indirizzo e-mail g_a_vindex@yahoo. it (g_a_vindex @ yahoo.it)

      Per tutti gli altri l'invito è a venirci a trovare a Marzabotto l'ultimo week-end di giugno, per bere insieme un bicchiere di vino e discutere amabilmente del nostro amore per Roma Antica. Per ulteriori informazioni sul festival visitate www.festivalocciden te.it

      Vi aspettiamo numerosi!!!


      Nova Roma Italia



      Animazioni GRATUITE per le tue e-mail - da IncrediMail! Fai clic qui!


      Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66635 From: Solomon Johri Date: 2009-06-11
      Subject: Re: Intercessio - End of the period allotted for tribuni plebis to s
      " Nothing is more unpredictable than the mob, nothing more obscure than public opinion, nothing more deceptive than the whole political system. "  -Cicero
       
      Salvete,
      Please tell me this signifies the end of the dispute........
       
      Optime Valete,
      Q. Decius Atellus

      From: M.C.C. <complutensis@...>
      To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
      Sent: Thursday, June 18, 2009 11:21:15 AM
      Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Intercessio - End of the period allotted for tribuni plebis to state agreement or disagreement.

      Marcus Curiatius Complutensis Consul Tribunibus Plebis omnes civibusque SPD


      Tribunus Plebis Gaius Vipsanius Agrippa has pronounced intercessio in name of the following citizens: Senator Gnaeus Iulius Caesar, Senator Lucius Cornelius Sulla Felix, Quintus Valerius Poplicola, and Marcus Valerius Potitus.

      This pronouncement is according with the Lex Didia Gemina de potestate tribunicia II.A.1.a

      Tribunus Plebis Gaius Vipsanius Agrippa has pronounced intercessio "against custodes Marcus Lucretius Agricola and Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus and against the consuls Marcus Iulius Severus and Marcus Cornelius Complutensis" . 

      In accordance with the Lex Didia Gemina de potestate tribunicia II.A.1.b the intercessio of the Tribuni must include the official name and office of the magistrate(s) against whose act or acts the intercessio or auxilium has been interposed. The intercessio is invalid because one of the consuls is not member of Gens Cornelia.

      In accordance with the Lex Didia Gemina de potestate tribunicia II.A.1.c the intercessio of the Tribuni must include the article(s) of the Constitution or the leges violated by the magistrate's act(s).

      In accordance with the Lex Didia Gemina de potestate tribunicia II.A.2. if the intercessio of a Tribunus Plebis does not include these three elements, the intercessio shall be invalid.

      The intercessio of  the Tribuni Plebis is invalid.

      Curate ut valeatis

      M. Curiatius Complutensis
      Consul

      PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@ aol.com escribió:

      Fl. Galerius Aurelianus Tribunus Plebis s.p.d.

      Under the Constitution, the lex Labiena de intercessione, and the lex Didia Gemina de poteste tribunicia--

      It has been 72 hours since the following intercessio was issued: 

      "Tribunus Plebis Gaius Vipsanius Agrippa SPD

      I pronounce intercessio against the custodes Marcus Lucretius Agricola and Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus in certifying the election of Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus as censor and against the consuls Marcus Iulius Severus and Marcus Cornelius Complutensis in accepting the election results. 

      This action was requested by Senator Gnaeus Iulius Caesar, Senator Lucius Cornelius Sulla Felix, Quintus Valerius Poplicola, and Marcus Valerius Potitus.

      Modianus cannot hold the office of censor. This would violate Section 1 of the Lex Cornelia Iunia de definitione intervallorum magistratuum; "no person shall hold the office of censor consecutively" with Section IV A of the constitution as the definition of the term 'office of censor'.

      As the Lex Cornelia Iunia de definitione intervallorum magistratuum does not define the term 'office of censor', the Constitution is used by virtue of Section I B, giving precedence to the constitution as the highest legal authority.

      The censorship is measured in a 2 year term and cannot be subdivided. Modianus cannot hold the office consecutively.

      Gaius Vipsanius Agrippa
      Tribunus Plebis"

      Of the remaining four Tribunes, one has agreed with the intercessio, one has withdrawn his disagreement & thus abstained, and the remaining two have also abstained.

      As such, the action which was vetoed shall be allowed to take effect starting immediately.

      I call for a new election for Censor to begin within thirty days of this date.

      Valete



      -----Original Message-----
      From: PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@ aol.com
      To: Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com
      Sent: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 9:33 am
      Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: Intercessio!



      Fl. Galerius Aurelianus Tribunus Plebis.

      I agree with the intercessio pronounced by Agrippa.

      Valete.


      -----Original Message-----
      From: PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@ aol.com
      To: Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com
      Sent: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 9:27 am
      Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: Intercessio!



      Sortilege is not under the sphere of Iuppiter Optimus Maximus because it was not a method that was used by the augurs.  Sortilege was found in a number of temples throughout the Roman world (especially Venus nd Fortuna) but I am not sure it was ever used in a temple dedicated to IOM.  Now if the ties in the election had been decided by the auspices being taken according to the signs of heaven, the flight of raptor birds, the sound of birds, and by the quadrapeds (horses, dogs, and wolves); then IOM would have been the one to decide the election.

      Please be accurate in your posts, Pontifex Maximo, because more than Dii Immortales are watching.

      Fl. Galerius Aurelianus
      Pontifex


      -----Original Message-----
      From: marcushoratius <MHoratius@hotmail. com>
      To: Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com
      Sent: Tue, 9 Jun 2009 2:38 pm
      Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Intercessio!



      M. Moravius C. Cato s. p. d.

      What you said below, that either Consul could have rejected Modianus' candidacy is true. The Custodes could have, as you say, refused to certify his election by some flaw. However, neither the Consules nor the Custodes did. And if the argument is thus that by accepting Modianus as a candidate they erred, then the time to do so would have been within seventy-two hours of the Consul announcing who had been accepted as candidates. Do so after the election was already held is contrary to the law. He must give his reason for why the election process itself, and/or the certification process was flawed. The issue over Modianus' candidacy expired before voting began.

      Then, too, you forget who else was involved in this process, for tie votes of the Centuriata were decided by casting lots. Sortition is a matter under the prorogative of Jupiter Optimus Maximus. In the end He is the one who really decided the results. Thus it could be argued that the Tribunus defied not only the will of the People but also the will of the Gods, who apparently did not reject Modianus' candidacy or else They might have cast the lots in your favor.

      At any rate, I don't agree that we are left with only one Censor really. If the intercessio stands then there will have to be a new election held. You cannot win by default, Cato, as you gained neither a majority of the Centuriata from the votes of the People, nor by the sortition overseen by the Gods.

      If asked, I shall perform an augurium on whether the Gods have indeed accepted Modianus as Censor suffectus to confirm whether They approved of the sortition. It is a matter for the Augurs to consider.

      Vale et vade in Deo

      --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com, "Gaius Equitius Cato" <mlcinnyc@.. .> wrote:
      >
      > Cato Moravio Piscino sal.
      >
      > Salve.
      >
      > Vipsanius' veto says that since the very basis upon which these results are being presented is flawed, and the basis upon which the consuls are accepting them is equally flawed, they cannot be either certified or accepted under our law. The analogy might be drawn between a manufacturer, a parts tester, and an inspector.
      >
      > Say a car is manufactured, and the brakes are faulty. The parts test results miss the flaw and it is passed. An inspector finds the fault in the brakes and returns the car to the manufacturer, saying that the testers were incorrect and that the car in is inherently flawed and cannot be driven. It doesn't matter if the publicity stills are in magazines already, or the ad campaign is in full swing, or even if the manufacturer has received tens of thousands of orders. If the car is flawed it cannot be driven.
      >
      > Certification and acceptance of the results are two more opportunities we have to protect the law of the Respublica; where they failed earlier, the tribunes can uphold the law in this instance. In fact, the custodes could have refused to certify the results on the same basis, that they are flawed by virtue of the candidate's inability to stand for the office. The consuls and praetors have the same opportunity, but it is clearly not in their interests (personal/political , that is, as following the law is demonstrably not within their concept of the well-being of the Respublica) to do so.
      >
      > Right now, by the virtue of the tribune's veto in accordance with our law, we have a sole censor in office, Galerius Paulinus.
      >
      > Vale,
      >
      > Cato
      >
      >
      >
      > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com, "marcushoratius" <MHoratius@> wrote:
      > >
      > > Salve Cato
      > >
      > > The only problem with your reasoning here is the discrepency between Agrippa's veto against the actions of magistrates and the reasoning he gave behind it. The reasoning he gave really concerned the candidacy of Modianus, based on an interpretation by Sulla, Gnaeus Caesar, and Potitius as to the meaning of "consecutive. " That was a misinterpretation IMHO. We are nearly six months into the year. The history behind the issue of electing suffecti in Nova Roma, even going back to the time when suffecti were appointed by the Senate, never considered "consecutive" in the way it has been misinterpreted by these few individuals for their own political reasons. The conflict here has nothing to do with the law. None the less...
      > >
      > > If the problem was in the candidacy then a Tribunus Plebis should have vetoed the candidacy before the Comitia met. That is, he could have vetoed the Consul's acceptance of the candidacy of someone he thought unqualified. That would allow other candidates to be reviewed and "certified" by the Consuls as eligible and the Tribuni given an opportunity to review the eligibility of all candidates prior to the Comitia assembling.
      > >
      > > However, Tribunus Agrippa vetoed the certification process conducted by the Custodes after the election. He gave no reason as to why he thought that process of certification was in error. Once the candidates were set, the Comitia having already concluded its voting, the issue of candidacies was over. To veto the Custodes over a candidacy is a non sequiter. So what, I would like to know, did the Tribunus see in error with the certification process itself to overthrow what the People had decided? If the Custodes found no error in the election process of the Comitia itself and therefore legally certified the results, then Agrippa's intercessio is without basis and should be withdrawn.
      > >
      > > Vale
      > > M. Moravius Piscinus
      > >
      > > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com, "Gaius Equitius Cato" <mlcinnyc@> wrote:
      > > >
      > > > Cato Galerio Aureliano sal.
      > > >
      > > > Salve.
      > > >
      > > > Your veto is incorrect, as is most of the argument surrounding this issue. Vipsanius Agrippa has not pronounced intercessio against the right of the People to hold or vote in elections, nor did he veto the results themselves (nor could he, as neither the act of voting nor the results of an election are acts of a magistrate). He has issued a veto against the certification of the results by the custodes and the acceptance of the results by the consuls, which *are* acts of magistrates, based on the fact that he believes the results reflect a violation of the Constitution.
      > > >
      > > > In point of fact a tribune *can* stop a vote or an election from happening in the first place - this is the law under Nova Roma and was actually practiced by the ancient Romans - so stopping an election or a vote on legislation is *not* un-Roman in the least. It is the assumption - and application - of current post-Enlightenment political theory that makes this seem "unfair", but the ancient Romans would have recognized it as perfectly valid.
      > > >
      > > > Those who beat the "be Roman, act Roman, follow the Romans" drum should understand that actual ancient Roman political practice was not really in any way democratic or "fair" by contemporary standards.
      > > >
      > > >
      > > > Vale.
      > > >
      > > > Cato
      > > >
      > > >
      > > >
      > > > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com, Robert Levee <galerius_of_ rome@> wrote:
      > > > >
      > > > >
      > > > > Salve et salvete,
      > > > >
      > > > > "I, Appius Galerius Aurelianus, tribune of the Plebs,
      > > > >
      > > > > In application of the paragraph IV.A.7b.of the Constitution of Nova Roma,
      > > > >
      > > > > Considering the Constitution of Nova Roma and of the laws which applies it and
      > > > > define the powers of the tribunes of the Plebs, especially in case of an intercessio,
      > > > >
      > > > > Considering the message nb 66421 issued in the Forum last Jun 7, 2009 4:32 pm by which
      > > > > Tribune G. Vipsanius Agrippa has pronounced "intercessio against the custodes Marcus Lucretius Agricola and
      > > > > Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus in certifying the election of Caeso Fabius Buteo
      > > > > Modianus as censor and against the consuls Marcus Iulius Severus and Marcus
      > > > > Cornelius Complutensis in accepting the election results",
      > > > >
      > > > > Considering that this intercessio violates the Constitution, and especially its
      > > > > article II, B, 3,
      > > > >
      > > > > Hereby veto the intercession thrown by Tribune G. Vipsanius Agrippa last Jun 7, 2009 4:32 pm."
      > > > >
      > > > > I have quoted the article II, B, 3 of the constitution. There may be other arguments, but this one (the right of Novaromans to take part in elections) is one of the good grounds here, for a tribune should never be eager to make his own voice prevailing on the People's one.
      > > > >
      > > > > Vale et valete,
      > > > > Ap.Galerius Aurelianus
      > > > > Tribune of the Plebs
      > > > >
      > > >
      > >
      >


      Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66636 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2009-06-11
      Subject: Re: Intercessio - End of the period allotted for tribuni plebis to s
      Cato omnibus in for SPD

      Salvete!

      I've been thinking about this an just posted this to the Consular Committee on Law List, but wanted to open it up here as well. Please read through it, think about it, before making a decision on what you think about it.

      Part of the reason that we have so many problems is that we have leges that demand so many specific things at specific times in specific ways that we are tripping over our own feet.

      Imagine that we repeal the leges Saliciae. What kind of hole do we leave - for practical purposes - in our law? Basically, we have no specifically-defined crimes and no specifically-defined punishments. Is that a bad thing?

      We don't say that there are not crimes or that they will not *be* punished, we just don't try to pre-determine what each one is be and how they will be dealt with. I think this is a good thing.

      This is where we simply plug in my proposal for courts made up of iudices, not praetors or consuls, and we leave the rest to them. This follows much more closely the ancient Roman model. The praetors act as sort of ring-masters, and panels of iudices do the actual work. The praetors would be available for general legal or technical questions, but *not* to voice an opinion about the specific case involved.

      The consuls, as in ancient Rome, simply would not act as judges unless the Senate specifically asked them to do so.


      So, Coruncanius, say you think I have lied about you in the Forum by saying something bad.

      You use your provocatio to go to the praetors. The praetors call a panel of iudices. The iudices determine that there seems to be merit to your case. They open a court. The praetor gives them certain instructions: it will last this long, each side being given equal time to present evidence, the iudices will have this long to deliberate and pronounce sentence. The court is open to the citizens to listen to if they want.

      A panel of iudices made up of citizens will be able to decide what punishment is appropriate; seeing as there are only two (moderation or banishment) it would basically be some form of one of those, based on the severity of the crime: maybe moderation for two weeks and a $10 fine. But that is left in the hands of the iudices, not painfully and elaborately spelled out by law.

      Any sentence of banishment MUST be put to a vote of the comitia.

      Part of the argument between Coruncanius and Sulla here is the ridiculous idea that we have to pre-determine the meaning of the word "harmful"; under my proposal, let the iudices decide.

      On the other hand, the iudices could simply say that the case doesn't merit a trial, and may even suggest some other form of reconciliation.

      A trial, if there is one, should be simply another facet of the judicial activity of the Respublica, not something that drags the entire apparatus of the government into a squabbling mess.

      Valete,

      Cato
      Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66637 From: Lucius Coruncanius Cato Date: 2009-06-11
      Subject: Re: Intercessio - End of the period allotted for tribuni plebis to s
      L. Coruncanius Cato G. Equitio Catoni SPD

      GEC: A trial, if there is one, should be simply another facet of the judicial activity of the Respublica, not something that drags the entire apparatus of the government into a squabbling mess...

      ...and bring the main list into an endless rant yard.

      This is a good proposal and a good substitute indeed. With an independent panel of iudices, magistrates would have time to do their work, instead of losing it in byzantine discussions about the meaning of some word.

      Di te incolumem custodiant.
      --
      L. Coruncanius Cato
      Aedilis Curulis
      Scriba Consulis Hispaniae

      --- El jue, 11/6/09, Gaius Equitius Cato <mlcinnyc@...> escribió:

      De: Gaius Equitius Cato <mlcinnyc@...>
      Asunto: [Nova-Roma] Re: Intercessio - End of the period allotted for tribuni plebis to state agreeme
      Para: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
      Fecha: jueves, 11 junio, 2009 2:27

      Cato omnibus in for SPD

      Salvete!

      I've been thinking about this an just posted this to the Consular Committee on Law List, but wanted to open it up here as well. Please read through it, think about it, before making a decision on what you think about it.

      Part of the reason that we have so many problems is that we have leges that demand so many specific things at specific times in specific ways that we are tripping over our own feet.

      Imagine that we repeal the leges Saliciae. What kind of hole do we leave - for practical purposes - in our law? Basically, we have no specifically- defined crimes and no specifically- defined punishments. Is that a bad thing?

      We don't say that there are not crimes or that they will not *be* punished, we just don't try to pre-determine what each one is be and how they will be dealt with. I think this is a good thing.

      This is where we simply plug in my proposal for courts made up of iudices, not praetors or consuls, and we leave the rest to them. This follows much more closely the ancient Roman model. The praetors act as sort of ring-masters, and panels of iudices do the actual work. The praetors would be available for general legal or technical questions, but *not* to voice an opinion about the specific case involved.

      The consuls, as in ancient Rome, simply would not act as judges unless the Senate specifically asked them to do so.

      So, Coruncanius, say you think I have lied about you in the Forum by saying something bad.

      You use your provocatio to go to the praetors. The praetors call a panel of iudices. The iudices determine that there seems to be merit to your case. They open a court. The praetor gives them certain instructions: it will last this long, each side being given equal time to present evidence, the iudices will have this long to deliberate and pronounce sentence. The court is open to the citizens to listen to if they want.

      A panel of iudices made up of citizens will be able to decide what punishment is appropriate; seeing as there are only two (moderation or banishment) it would basically be some form of one of those, based on the severity of the crime: maybe moderation for two weeks and a $10 fine. But that is left in the hands of the iudices, not painfully and elaborately spelled out by law.

      Any sentence of banishment MUST be put to a vote of the comitia.

      Part of the argument between Coruncanius and Sulla here is the ridiculous idea that we have to pre-determine the meaning of the word "harmful"; under my proposal, let the iudices decide.

      On the other hand, the iudices could simply say that the case doesn't merit a trial, and may even suggest some other form of reconciliation.

      A trial, if there is one, should be simply another facet of the judicial activity of the Respublica, not something that drags the entire apparatus of the government into a squabbling mess.

      Valete,

      Cato


      Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66638 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2009-06-11
      Subject: Re: Intercessio - End of the period allotted for tribuni plebis to s
      Cato Coruncanio Catoni omnibusque in foro SPD

      Salve et salvete.

      Exactly.

      And how would a lex like this read?

      "1. Any citizen may claim the right of provocatio against any other citizen (excepting a sitting magistrate) by appealing to the praetors.

      2. From the list of assidui, a panel of five iudices will be chosen by lot by the praetura within one nundinum (excepting dies nefasti and nefasti publici). The actor may dismiss up to three of those chosen with or without cause, and the praetura shall continue to choose by lots until the actor has either accepted the panel or has used up his three dismissals.

      3. The iudices will determine by majority vote whether or not there is merit to the case. If they decide it does, they will call a court into session on a List open to observance by all citizens within one nundinum. If they decide it does not, they will dismiss it and may offer some other method of reconcilement. The decision of the iudices is final.

      4. The praetura will then issue guidelines regarding the length of the trial, giving each side equal opportunity to present evidence and appointing a citizen from the panel of iudices who shall act as the moderator for the trial. No trial shall be less than one nundinum nor more than two nundini in length.

      5. The praetura shall be available for questions regarding the process of the trial and legal interpretation, but may not make any comment regarding the merits of the case while it is in process. Only the praetor, the iudices, the actor, and the reus (or the advocati if any) shall be allowed to speak in the court. Only the praetura shall make any public announcements regarding the trial.

      6. If the iudices decide in favor of the actor, they will pronounce a verdict. If the iudices decide in favor of the reus, the case is immediately dismissed. Verdicts may be moderation for any period of time (but not more than three months), a fine paid to the Aerarium (but not more than US$50 or the equivalent thereof), a combination of these, or banishment for a specific length of time. Verdicts pronounced by the iudices shall be final, excepting only cases in which the verdict is banishment for any length of time; in that case, the verdict shall be placed before the People for a vote in the comitia centuriata within one calendar week of the verdict being announced. In this case, the decision of the People shall be final.

      7. If a verdict is pronounced against the reus, he or she shall have one nunidinum to publicly announce their agreement; refusal to do so will result in moderation for a period of no less than one month and no more than three months, as decided by the praetura.

      8. Any part of this lex which requires action by any magistrate (the appointment of iudices, the calling of the comitia, etc.) shall be considered mandatory upon the magistracy involved; any failure to fulfill these requirements will be unequivocably considered legal dereliction of duty and will result in the magistrates involved being immediately removed from office, their offices declared vacant, and all century points awarded for holding that office being removed."


      The last part is the stick bit; magistrates should not be allowed to ignore the law simply by being silent; if one or the other of the praetors does not obey the law, they will both be removed from office.

      Vale et valete,

      Cato
      Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66639 From: Jesse Corradino Date: 2009-06-11
      Subject: Re: Another little brag. . .
      Well it's like pulp fiction then, "rat may taste like pumpkin pie, but I'd never eat it."
       
      > To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
      > From: famila.ulleria.venii@...
      > Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 16:48:00 -0500
      > Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: Another little brag. . .
      >
      > heya;
      >
      > On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 10:13 AM, Jesse Corradino wrote
      > >
      > > There aren't seriously people who make sauce with ketchup, are there?  I'm
      > > crying blood!
      > >
      >
      > Actually, my wife has a recipe from her mom, which is an
      > "Americanized" version of a Greek meat sauce that does use catsup as
      > one of the flavoring components. It is mighty tasty.
      >
      > Venathustra
      >
      >
      > ------------------------------------
      >
      > Yahoo! Groups Links
      >
      > <*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
      > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma/
      >
      > <*> Your email settings:
      > Individual Email | Traditional
      >
      > <*> To change settings online go to:
      > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma/join
      > (Yahoo! ID required)
      >
      > <*> To change settings via email:
      > mailto:Nova-Roma-digest@yahoogroups.com
      > mailto:Nova-Roma-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com
      >
      > <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
      > Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
      >
      > <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
      > http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
      >


      Hotmail® has ever-growing storage! Don’t worry about storage limits. Check it out.
      Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66640 From: L Julia Aquila Date: 2009-06-11
      Subject: Re: Another little brag. . .
      Salve Jesse,

      I must agree here but add, i will not eat pumpkin pie either - add dormouse to that list too;)

      Vale,
      Julia


      --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Jesse Corradino <woden66@...> wrote:
      >
      >
      > Well it's like pulp fiction then, "rat may taste like pumpkin pie, but I'd never eat it."
      >
      > > To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
      > > From: famila.ulleria.venii@...
      > > Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 16:48:00 -0500
      > > Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: Another little brag. . .
      > >
      > > heya;
      > >
      > > On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 10:13 AM, Jesse Corradino wrote
      > > >
      > > > There aren't seriously people who make sauce with ketchup, are there? I'm
      > > > crying blood!
      > > >
      > >
      > > Actually, my wife has a recipe from her mom, which is an
      > > "Americanized" version of a Greek meat sauce that does use catsup as
      > > one of the flavoring components. It is mighty tasty.
      > >
      > > Venathustra
      > >
      > >
      > > ------------------------------------
      > >
      > > Yahoo! Groups Links
      > >
      > >
      > >
      >
      > _________________________________________________________________
      > Hotmail® has ever-growing storage! Don't worry about storage limits.
      > http://windowslive.com/Tutorial/Hotmail/Storage?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_HM_Tutorial_Storage_062009
      >
      Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66641 From: L Julia Aquila Date: 2009-06-11
      Subject: Re: Classic Poetry, Prose, Proems, Literature Excerpts
      Salvete Omnes,

      For this hour, although I will keep to the classical theme of ancient Rome I will post two pieces by modern authors:


      Classical Criticism
      By George Lynde Richardson


      21 B. C.

      OLD Horace on a summer afternoon,
      Well primed with sweet Falernian, let us say,
      Lulled by the far-off brooklet 's drowsy croon
      To a half-doze in a haphazard way,
      Scratched off a half a dozen careless rhymes,
      As was his habit. When next day he came
      Awake to work, he read them several times,
      In vain attempt to catch their sense and aim.
      "What was I thinking of? Blest if I know,
      Jupiter! What 's the difference? Let them go!"

      886 A. D.

      "LINES twelve to twenty are in great dispute,"
      (Most learnedly the lecturer doth speak,)
      "I think I shall be able to refute
      Orelli's claim they 're taken from the Greek.
      I think, with Bentley, Horace's purpose here
      Is irony, and yet I do not know
      But Dillenberger's reading is more clear,
      For which he gives eight arguments, although
      Wilkins gives twelve objections to the same"—
      So on (ad infinitum). Such is fame!



      Virgil's Tomb
      "Cecini Pascua, Rura, Duces"
      By Robert Cameron Rogers


      ON an olive-crested steep
      Hanging o'er the dusty road,
      Lieth in his last abode,
      Wrapped in everlasting sleep,

      He who in the days of yore
      Sang of pastures, sang of farms,
      Sang of heroes and their arms,
      Sang of passion, sang of war.

      When the lark at dawning tells,
      Herald like, the coming day,
      And along the dusty way
      Comes the sound of tinkling bells,

      Rising to the tomb aloft,
      While some modern Corydon
      Drives his bleating cattle on
      From the stable to the croft:

      Then the soul of Virgil seems
      To awaken from its dreams,
      To sing again the melodies
      Of which he often tells,—
      The music of the birds,
      The lowing of the herds,
      The tinkling of the bells.


      Valete,
      Julia

      --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "L Julia Aquila" <dis_pensible@...> wrote:
      >
      > Salvete Omnes,
      >
      > I am beginning a new thread because the old title still shows up and not every day is Dies Nefastus Publicus. This is a continuation of the old thread, some of which I may recycle from time to time:
      > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma/post?act=reply&messageNum=66584
      > Please remember this is a thread for every Nova Roma Citizen and guest, so please feel free to post your choice of Classic Poetry, Prose, Proems, Literature ~
      >
      >
      > For this hour's selection -
      >
      > Let us remember Vesta today, Her Eternal Fire, Her Fairness and Her Mercy. Let's turn away for a time from strife and politics and adore Her, ask for Her Blessings, to bestow us with Strength and pledge to keep Her in our hearts and support Her Vestals who make sacrifices to keep Her Eternal Flame burning for the benefit of our Respublica, of our fellow citizens of Nova Roma.
      >
      > Fasti IV, 291-328 Ovidus
      >
      > She'd arrived at the mouth (ostia) where the Tiber divides
      > To meet the deep, and flows with a wider sweep:
      > All the Knights, grave Senators, and commoners,
      > Came to meet her at the mouth of the Tuscan river.
      > [295] With them walked mothers, daughters, and brides,
      > And all those virgins who tend the sacred fires.
      > The men wearied their arms hauling hard on the ropes:
      > The foreign vessel barely made way against the stream.
      > For a long time there'd been a drought: the grass was dry
      > [300] And scorched: the boat stuck fast in the muddy shallows.
      > Every man, hauling, laboured beyond his strength,
      > And encouraged their toiling hands with his cries.
      > Yet the ship lodged there, like an island fixed in mid-ocean:
      > And astonished at the portent, men stood and quaked.
      > [305] Claudia Quinta traced her descent from noble Clausus,
      > And her beauty was in no way unequal to her nobility:
      > She was chaste, but not believed so: hostile rumour
      > Had wounded her, false charges were levelled at her:
      > Her elegance, promenading around in various hairstyles,
      > [310] And her ready tongue, with stiff old men, counted against her.
      > Conscious of virtue, she laughed at the rumoured lies,
      > But we're always ready to credit others with faults.
      > Now, when she'd stepped from the line of chaste women,
      > Taking pure river water in her hands, she wetted her head
      > [315] Three times, three times lifted her palms to the sky,
      > (Everyone watching her thought she'd lost her mind)
      > Then, kneeling, fixed her eyes on the goddess's statue,
      > And, with loosened hair, uttered these words:
      > " Kind and fruitful Mother of the Gods, accept
      > [320] A suppliant's prayers, on this one condition:
      > They deny I'm chaste: let me be guilty if you condemn me:
      > Convicted by a goddess I'll pay for it with my life.
      > But if I'm free of guilt, grant a pledge of my innocence
      > By your action: and, chaste, give way to my chaste hands."
      > [325] She spoke: then gave a slight pull at the rope,
      > (A wonder, but the sacred drama attests what I say):
      > The goddess stirred, followed, and, following, approved her:
      > Witness the sound of jubilation carried to the stars.
      > They came to a bend in the river (called of old
      > [330] The Halls of Tiber): there the stream turns left, ascending.
      > Night fell: they tied the rope to an oak stump,
      > And, having eaten, settled to a tranquil sleep.
      > Dawn rose: they loosed the rope from the oak stump,
      > After first laying a fire and offering incense,
      > [335] And crowned the stern, and sacrificed a heifer
      > Free of blemish, that had never known yoke or bull.
      > There's a place where smooth-flowing Almo joins the Tiber,
      > And the lesser flow loses its name in the greater:
      > There, a white-headed priest in purple robes
      > [340] Washed the Lady, and sacred relics, in Almo's water.
      > The attendants howled, and the mad flutes blew,
      > And soft hands beat at the bull's-hide drums.
      > Claudia walked in front with a joyful face,
      > Her chastity proven by the goddess's testimony:
      > [345] The goddess herself, sitting in a cart, entered the Capene Gate:
      > Fresh flowers were scattered over the yoked oxen.
      > Nasica received her. The name of her temple's founder is lost:
      > Augustus has re-dedicated it, and, before him, Metellus.
      >
      > Translation: A.S. Kline, © 2004.
      >
      > ostia contigerat, qua se Tiberinus in altum
      > dividit et campo liberiore natat:
      > omnis eques mixtaque gravis cum plebe senatus
      > obvius ad Tusci fluminis ora venit.
      > [295] procedunt pariter matres nataeque nurusque
      > quaeque colunt sanctos virginitate focos.
      > sedula fune viri contento bracchia lassant:
      > vix subit adversas hospita navis aquas.
      > sicca diu fuerat tellus, sitis usserat herbas:
      > [300] sedit limoso pressa carina vado.
      > quisquis adest operi, plus quam pro parte laborat,
      > adiuvat et fortes voce sonante manus:
      > illa velut medio stabilis sedet insula ponto;
      > attoniti monstro stantque paventque viri.
      > [305] Claudia Quinta genus Clauso referebat ab alto
      > (nec facies impar nobilitate fuit),
      > casta quidem, sed non et credita: rumor iniquus
      > laeserat, et falsi criminis acta rea est.
      > cultus et ornatis varie prodisse capillis
      > [310] obfuit ad rigidos promptaque lingua senes.
      > conscia mens recti famae mendacia risit,
      > sed nos in vitium credula turba sumus.
      > haec ubi castarum processit ab agmine matrum
      > et manibus puram fluminis hausit aquam,
      > [315] ter caput inrorat, ter tollit in aethera palmas
      > (quicumque aspiciunt, mente carere putant),
      > summissoque genu voltus in imagine divae
      > figit, et hos edit crine iacente sonos:
      > "supplicis, alma, tuae, genetrix fecunda deorum,
      > [320] accipe sub certa condicione preces.
      > casta negor: si tu damnas, meruisse fatebor;
      > morte luam poenas iudice victa dea;
      > sed si crimen abest, tu nostrae pignora vitae
      > re dabis, et castas casta sequere manus."
      > [325] dixit, et exiguo funem conamine traxit;
      > mira, sed et scaena testificata loquar:
      > mota dea est, sequiturque ducem laudatque sequendo;
      > index laetitiae fertur ad astra sonus.
      > fluminis ad flexum veniunt (Tiberina priores
      > [330] Atria dixerunt), unde sinister abit.
      > nox aderat: querno religant in stipite funem,
      > dantque levi somno corpora functa cibo.
      > lux aderat: querno solvunt a stipite funem,
      > ante tamen posito tura dedere foco,
      > [335] ante coronarunt puppem, sine labe iuvencam
      > mactarunt operum coniugiique rudem.
      > est locus, in Tiberim qua lubricus influit Almo
      > et nomen magno perdit in amne minor.
      > illic purpurea canus cum veste sacerdos
      > [340] Almonis dominam sacraque lavit aquis.
      > exululant comites, furiosaque tibia flatur,
      > et feriunt molles taurea terga manus.
      > Claudia praecedit laeto celeberrima voltu,
      > credita vix tandem teste pudica dea;
      > [345] ipsa sedens plaustro porta est invecta Capena:
      > sparguntur iunctae flore recente boves.
      > Nasica accepit; templi non perstitit auctor:
      > Augustus nunc est, ante Metellus erat.
      >
      > Valete,
      > Julia
      >
      Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66642 From: L Julia Aquila Date: 2009-06-11
      Subject: Re: Roman cookery
      Salve Jesse,

      Look through the thread in earlier posts and there are a few recipes and some that have been "converted" for modern use.
      http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma/message/63233
      Try one of the cheesecakes. I intend to convert more as time permits!
      Here is another link:
      http://novaroma.org/nr/Category:Roman_cooking
      And also we have a sodalitas dedicated to Roman food and drink:
      http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Sodalis_Coq_et_Coq/

      Congratulations on your daughters birth!

      Vale,
      Julia


      --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Jesse Corradino <woden66@...> wrote:
      >
      >
      > Are there any genuinely tastey roman dishes? In the last year or so of my life I've committed myself to learn how to cook for two reasons: one, I'm pretty much the last member of my family to keep a lot of our recipes alive and two, I've recently had a daughter (Claudia) who I don't want to see grow up eating frozen food from a grocery store. Anyway, I really love the hobby and so now I'm always looking meals I can brag about. One of the reasons I was drawn to Nova Roma was to find out more about this topic, so I'm curious if anyone has some feedback :)
      >
      Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66643 From: wuffa2001 Date: 2009-06-11
      Subject: Roman cookery II Request for Help
      Salvete

      anyone who is working Roman cookery .
      I request your help.

      I want to make the following , and wish to know if anyone has done so and whats the best way to do.

      Defritum

      thick fig syrup ( should I just cook down some figs or do we add sopmething to it as it cooks?)


      my thanks

      Valete

      Marcus Cornelius Felix
      Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66644 From: Titus Flavius Aquila Date: 2009-06-11
      Subject: AW: [Nova-Roma] Intercessio - End of the period allotted for tribuni
      Salve Consul Complutensis,
       
      thank you !

      Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus has been elected Censor Suffectus by the citizens of Nova Roma and by the will of the Roman Gods (lot decision).
      The intercessio of Tribunus Plebis Gaius Vipsanius Agrippa would act against the will of the people of Nova Roma and would interfere
      with the holy spirit of the lot, guarded by our Roman Gods !
       
      Optime vale
      Titus Flavius Aquila
      Quaestor and former Tribunus Plebis


      Von: M.C.C. <complutensis@...>
      An: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
      Gesendet: Donnerstag, den 18. Juni 2009, 17:21:15 Uhr
      Betreff: Re: [Nova-Roma] Intercessio - End of the period allotted for tribuni plebis to state agreement or disagreement.

      Marcus Curiatius Complutensis Consul Tribunibus Plebis omnes civibusque SPD


      Tribunus Plebis Gaius Vipsanius Agrippa has pronounced intercessio in name of the following citizens: Senator Gnaeus Iulius Caesar, Senator Lucius Cornelius Sulla Felix, Quintus Valerius Poplicola, and Marcus Valerius Potitus.

      This pronouncement is according with the Lex Didia Gemina de potestate tribunicia II.A.1.a

      Tribunus Plebis Gaius Vipsanius Agrippa has pronounced intercessio "against custodes Marcus Lucretius Agricola and Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus and against the consuls Marcus Iulius Severus and Marcus Cornelius Complutensis" . 

      In accordance with the Lex Didia Gemina de potestate tribunicia II.A.1.b the intercessio of the Tribuni must include the official name and office of the magistrate(s) against whose act or acts the intercessio or auxilium has been interposed. The intercessio is invalid because one of the consuls is not member of Gens Cornelia.

      In accordance with the Lex Didia Gemina de potestate tribunicia II.A.1.c the intercessio of the Tribuni must include the article(s) of the Constitution or the leges violated by the magistrate's act(s).

      In accordance with the Lex Didia Gemina de potestate tribunicia II.A.2. if the intercessio of a Tribunus Plebis does not include these three elements, the intercessio shall be invalid.

      The intercessio of  the Tribuni Plebis is invalid.

      Curate ut valeatis

      M. Curiatius Complutensis
      Consul

      PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@ aol.com escribió:

      Fl. Galerius Aurelianus Tribunus Plebis s.p.d.

      Under the Constitution, the lex Labiena de intercessione, and the lex Didia Gemina de poteste tribunicia--

      It has been 72 hours since the following intercessio was issued: 

      "Tribunus Plebis Gaius Vipsanius Agrippa SPD

      I pronounce intercessio against the custodes Marcus Lucretius Agricola and Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus in certifying the election of Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus as censor and against the consuls Marcus Iulius Severus and Marcus Cornelius Complutensis in accepting the election results. 

      This action was requested by Senator Gnaeus Iulius Caesar, Senator Lucius Cornelius Sulla Felix, Quintus Valerius Poplicola, and Marcus Valerius Potitus.

      Modianus cannot hold the office of censor. This would violate Section 1 of the Lex Cornelia Iunia de definitione intervallorum magistratuum; "no person shall hold the office of censor consecutively" with Section IV A of the constitution as the definition of the term 'office of censor'.

      As the Lex Cornelia Iunia de definitione intervallorum magistratuum does not define the term 'office of censor', the Constitution is used by virtue of Section I B, giving precedence to the constitution as the highest legal authority.

      The censorship is measured in a 2 year term and cannot be subdivided. Modianus cannot hold the office consecutively.

      Gaius Vipsanius Agrippa
      Tribunus Plebis"

      Of the remaining four Tribunes, one has agreed with the intercessio, one has withdrawn his disagreement & thus abstained, and the remaining two have also abstained.

      As such, the action which was vetoed shall be allowed to take effect starting immediately.

      I call for a new election for Censor to begin within thirty days of this date.

      Valete



      -----Original Message-----
      From: PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@ aol.com
      To: Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com
      Sent: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 9:33 am
      Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: Intercessio!



      Fl. Galerius Aurelianus Tribunus Plebis.

      I agree with the intercessio pronounced by Agrippa.

      Valete.


      -----Original Message-----
      From: PADRUIGTHEUNCLE@ aol.com
      To: Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com
      Sent: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 9:27 am
      Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: Intercessio!



      Sortilege is not under the sphere of Iuppiter Optimus Maximus because it was not a method that was used by the augurs.  Sortilege was found in a number of temples throughout the Roman world (especially Venus nd Fortuna) but I am not sure it was ever used in a temple dedicated to IOM.  Now if the ties in the election had been decided by the auspices being taken according to the signs of heaven, the flight of raptor birds, the sound of birds, and by the quadrapeds (horses, dogs, and wolves); then IOM would have been the one to decide the election.

      Please be accurate in your posts, Pontifex Maximo, because more than Dii Immortales are watching.

      Fl. Galerius Aurelianus
      Pontifex


      -----Original Message-----
      From: marcushoratius <MHoratius@hotmail. com>
      To: Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com
      Sent: Tue, 9 Jun 2009 2:38 pm
      Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Intercessio!



      M. Moravius C. Cato s. p. d.

      What you said below, that either Consul could have rejected Modianus' candidacy is true. The Custodes could have, as you say, refused to certify his election by some flaw. However, neither the Consules nor the Custodes did. And if the argument is thus that by accepting Modianus as a candidate they erred, then the time to do so would have been within seventy-two hours of the Consul announcing who had been accepted as candidates. Do so after the election was already held is contrary to the law. He must give his reason for why the election process itself, and/or the certification process was flawed. The issue over Modianus' candidacy expired before voting began.

      Then, too, you forget who else was involved in this process, for tie votes of the Centuriata were decided by casting lots. Sortition is a matter under the prorogative of Jupiter Optimus Maximus. In the end He is the one who really decided the results. Thus it could be argued that the Tribunus defied not only the will of the People but also the will of the Gods, who apparently did not reject Modianus' candidacy or else They might have cast the lots in your favor.

      At any rate, I don't agree that we are left with only one Censor really. If the intercessio stands then there will have to be a new election held. You cannot win by default, Cato, as you gained neither a majority of the Centuriata from the votes of the People, nor by the sortition overseen by the Gods.

      If asked, I shall perform an augurium on whether the Gods have indeed accepted Modianus as Censor suffectus to confirm whether They approved of the sortition. It is a matter for the Augurs to consider.

      Vale et vade in Deo

      --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com, "Gaius Equitius Cato" <mlcinnyc@.. .> wrote:
      >
      > Cato Moravio Piscino sal.
      >
      > Salve.
      >
      > Vipsanius' veto says that since the very basis upon which these results are being presented is flawed, and the basis upon which the consuls are accepting them is equally flawed, they cannot be either certified or accepted under our law. The analogy might be drawn between a manufacturer, a parts tester, and an inspector.
      >
      > Say a car is manufactured, and the brakes are faulty. The parts test results miss the flaw and it is passed. An inspector finds the fault in the brakes and returns the car to the manufacturer, saying that the testers were incorrect and that the car in is inherently flawed and cannot be driven. It doesn't matter if the publicity stills are in magazines already, or the ad campaign is in full swing, or even if the manufacturer has received tens of thousands of orders. If the car is flawed it cannot be driven.
      >
      > Certification and acceptance of the results are two more opportunities we have to protect the law of the Respublica; where they failed earlier, the tribunes can uphold the law in this instance. In fact, the custodes could have refused to certify the results on the same basis, that they are flawed by virtue of the candidate's inability to stand for the office. The consuls and praetors have the same opportunity, but it is clearly not in their interests (personal/political , that is, as following the law is demonstrably not within their concept of the well-being of the Respublica) to do so.
      >
      > Right now, by the virtue of the tribune's veto in accordance with our law, we have a sole censor in office, Galerius Paulinus.
      >
      > Vale,
      >
      > Cato
      >
      >
      >
      > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com, "marcushoratius" <MHoratius@> wrote:
      > >
      > > Salve Cato
      > >
      > > The only problem with your reasoning here is the discrepency between Agrippa's veto against the actions of magistrates and the reasoning he gave behind it. The reasoning he gave really concerned the candidacy of Modianus, based on an interpretation by Sulla, Gnaeus Caesar, and Potitius as to the meaning of "consecutive. " That was a misinterpretation IMHO. We are nearly six months into the year. The history behind the issue of electing suffecti in Nova Roma, even going back to the time when suffecti were appointed by the Senate, never considered "consecutive" in the way it has been misinterpreted by these few individuals for their own political reasons. The conflict here has nothing to do with the law. None the less...
      > >
      > > If the problem was in the candidacy then a Tribunus Plebis should have vetoed the candidacy before the Comitia met. That is, he could have vetoed the Consul's acceptance of the candidacy of someone he thought unqualified. That would allow other candidates to be reviewed and "certified" by the Consuls as eligible and the Tribuni given an opportunity to review the eligibility of all candidates prior to the Comitia assembling.
      > >
      > > However, Tribunus Agrippa vetoed the certification process conducted by the Custodes after the election. He gave no reason as to why he thought that process of certification was in error. Once the candidates were set, the Comitia having already concluded its voting, the issue of candidacies was over. To veto the Custodes over a candidacy is a non sequiter. So what, I would like to know, did the Tribunus see in error with the certification process itself to overthrow what the People had decided? If the Custodes found no error in the election process of the Comitia itself and therefore legally certified the results, then Agrippa's intercessio is without basis and should be withdrawn.
      > >
      > > Vale
      > > M. Moravius Piscinus
      > >
      > > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com, "Gaius Equitius Cato" <mlcinnyc@> wrote:
      > > >
      > > > Cato Galerio Aureliano sal.
      > > >
      > > > Salve.
      > > >
      > > > Your veto is incorrect, as is most of the argument surrounding this issue. Vipsanius Agrippa has not pronounced intercessio against the right of the People to hold or vote in elections, nor did he veto the results themselves (nor could he, as neither the act of voting nor the results of an election are acts of a magistrate). He has issued a veto against the certification of the results by the custodes and the acceptance of the results by the consuls, which *are* acts of magistrates, based on the fact that he believes the results reflect a violation of the Constitution.
      > > >
      > > > In point of fact a tribune *can* stop a vote or an election from happening in the first place - this is the law under Nova Roma and was actually practiced by the ancient Romans - so stopping an election or a vote on legislation is *not* un-Roman in the least. It is the assumption - and application - of current post-Enlightenment political theory that makes this seem "unfair", but the ancient Romans would have recognized it as perfectly valid.
      > > >
      > > > Those who beat the "be Roman, act Roman, follow the Romans" drum should understand that actual ancient Roman political practice was not really in any way democratic or "fair" by contemporary standards.
      > > >
      > > >
      > > > Vale.
      > > >
      > > > Cato
      > > >
      > > >
      > > >
      > > > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com, Robert Levee <galerius_of_ rome@> wrote:
      > > > >
      > > > >
      > > > > Salve et salvete,
      > > > >
      > > > > "I, Appius Galerius Aurelianus, tribune of the Plebs,
      > > > >
      > > > > In application of the paragraph IV.A.7b.of the Constitution of Nova Roma,
      > > > >
      > > > > Considering the Constitution of Nova Roma and of the laws which applies it and
      > > > > define the powers of the tribunes of the Plebs, especially in case of an intercessio,
      > > > >
      > > > > Considering the message nb 66421 issued in the Forum last Jun 7, 2009 4:32 pm by which
      > > > > Tribune G. Vipsanius Agrippa has pronounced "intercessio against the custodes Marcus Lucretius Agricola and
      > > > > Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus in certifying the election of Caeso Fabius Buteo
      > > > > Modianus as censor and against the consuls Marcus Iulius Severus and Marcus
      > > > > Cornelius Complutensis in accepting the election results",
      > > > >
      > > > > Considering that this intercessio violates the Constitution, and especially its
      > > > > article II, B, 3,
      > > > >
      > > > > Hereby veto the intercession thrown by Tribune G. Vipsanius Agrippa last Jun 7, 2009 4:32 pm."
      > > > >
      > > > > I have quoted the article II, B, 3 of the constitution. There may be other arguments, but this one (the right of Novaromans to take part in elections) is one of the good grounds here, for a tribune should never be eager to make his own voice prevailing on the People's one.
      > > > >
      > > > > Vale et valete,
      > > > > Ap.Galerius Aurelianus
      > > > > Tribune of the Plebs
      > > > >
      > > >
      > >
      >


      Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66645 From: livia_plauta Date: 2009-06-11
      Subject: Cato's law proposal (Was: Re: Intercessio - )
      Livia Catoni sal.

      I like this lex proposal, but I'd like to suggest two modifications.

      First, we need to add a clause on what happens if the reus refuses to appear in court (see Cincinnatus' case). The roman solution would be to state that by not appearing he/she admits his/her guilt, so should be condemned. Otherwise there will be no coercing force to make people take the trial process seriously.

      Second, if the penalty for not taking action is so harsh for the magistrates, then more than one week should be available to call the comitia in case a banishment needs to be voted on. There might be dies nefasti in the meantime, and people have private lives too. Everything else is expressed in nundina, so le't make this one a nundinum too.

      Vale,
      Livia


      >
      > Exactly.
      >
      > And how would a lex like this read?
      >
      > "1. Any citizen may claim the right of provocatio against any other citizen (excepting a sitting magistrate) by appealing to the praetors.
      >
      > 2. From the list of assidui, a panel of five iudices will be chosen by lot by the praetura within one nundinum (excepting dies nefasti and nefasti publici). The actor may dismiss up to three of those chosen with or without cause, and the praetura shall continue to choose by lots until the actor has either accepted the panel or has used up his three dismissals.
      >
      > 3. The iudices will determine by majority vote whether or not there is merit to the case. If they decide it does, they will call a court into session on a List open to observance by all citizens within one nundinum. If they decide it does not, they will dismiss it and may offer some other method of reconcilement. The decision of the iudices is final.
      >
      > 4. The praetura will then issue guidelines regarding the length of the trial, giving each side equal opportunity to present evidence and appointing a citizen from the panel of iudices who shall act as the moderator for the trial. No trial shall be less than one nundinum nor more than two nundini in length.
      >
      > 5. The praetura shall be available for questions regarding the process of the trial and legal interpretation, but may not make any comment regarding the merits of the case while it is in process. Only the praetor, the iudices, the actor, and the reus (or the advocati if any) shall be allowed to speak in the court. Only the praetura shall make any public announcements regarding the trial.
      >
      > 6. If the iudices decide in favor of the actor, they will pronounce a verdict. If the iudices decide in favor of the reus, the case is immediately dismissed. Verdicts may be moderation for any period of time (but not more than three months), a fine paid to the Aerarium (but not more than US$50 or the equivalent thereof), a combination of these, or banishment for a specific length of time. Verdicts pronounced by the iudices shall be final, excepting only cases in which the verdict is banishment for any length of time; in that case, the verdict shall be placed before the People for a vote in the comitia centuriata within one calendar week of the verdict being announced. In this case, the decision of the People shall be final.
      >
      > 7. If a verdict is pronounced against the reus, he or she shall have one nunidinum to publicly announce their agreement; refusal to do so will result in moderation for a period of no less than one month and no more than three months, as decided by the praetura.
      >
      > 8. Any part of this lex which requires action by any magistrate (the appointment of iudices, the calling of the comitia, etc.) shall be considered mandatory upon the magistracy involved; any failure to fulfill these requirements will be unequivocably considered legal dereliction of duty and will result in the magistrates involved being immediately removed from office, their offices declared vacant, and all century points awarded for holding that office being removed."
      >
      >
      > The last part is the stick bit; magistrates should not be allowed to ignore the law simply by being silent; if one or the other of the praetors does not obey the law, they will both be removed from office.
      >
      > Vale et valete,
      >
      > Cato
      >
      Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66646 From: Shoshana Hathaway Date: 2009-06-11
      Subject: Re: Roman cookery II Request for Help
      Salve Felix, et salvete omnes,

      I may be mistaken, but I do believe there are instructions for what you want
      to do in our own cookery list. I *know* I've read posts concerning making
      this, so if you are a member of that list, check the files and archives. If
      you aren't, yet, you might want to consider joining. Tis a great list!

      Vale et valete bene,
      C. Maria Caeca
      ----- Original Message -----
      From: "wuffa2001" <magewuffa@...>
      To: <Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com>
      Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2009 12:49 PM
      Subject: [Nova-Roma] Roman cookery II Request for Help


      > Salvete
      >
      > anyone who is working Roman cookery .
      > I request your help.
      >
      > I want to make the following , and wish to know if anyone has done so and
      > whats the best way to do.
      >
      > Defritum
      >
      > thick fig syrup ( should I just cook down some figs or do we add
      > sopmething to it as it cooks?)
      >
      >
      > my thanks
      >
      > Valete
      >
      > Marcus Cornelius Felix
      >
      >
      >
      >
      >
      >
      > ------------------------------------
      >
      > Yahoo! Groups Links
      >
      >
      >


      --------------------------------------------------------------------------------



      No virus found in this incoming message.
      Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
      Version: 8.5.339 / Virus Database: 270.12.63/2169 - Release Date: 06/11/09
      05:53:00
      Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66647 From: L Julia Aquila Date: 2009-06-11
      Subject: Re: Roman cookery II Request for Help
      Salve,

      Defritum (thick fig syrup)
      My Grandfather had an orchard and garden in his large yard in of all places Long Island NY, he even grew his own figs. He had a green thumb and was able to successfully grow warmer climate fruits, although the harvest time for the figs was very short. He grew very sweet large pear shape figs of a deepest purple almost black color with a deep red center may have been Negronne but I am not certain.
      For the "honey fig syrup" or miele di fichi, I think that is right, he would use the ripest figs, wash them very carefully (even though he only used natural insect control) keeping the skin intact and then boil them down until they were a thick syrup, about a third of the original volume. Low heat just to a slow simmer and stirring often.
      This would be used in Chicken recipes, Fish (Tuna), Veal and desserts, also with honey in a version of those sticky little nut (almond and pignoli) covered cooked dough balls – Strufoli?
      My Grandfather would also prepare some for use as a natural laxative but would be boiled to a slightly thicker consistency.

      A Greek version adds Bay Leaf.

      Hope this helps,

      Vale
      Julia


      --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "wuffa2001" <magewuffa@...> wrote:
      >
      > Salvete
      >
      > anyone who is working Roman cookery .
      > I request your help.
      >
      > I want to make the following , and wish to know if anyone has done so and whats the best way to do.
      >
      > Defritum
      >
      > thick fig syrup ( should I just cook down some figs or do we add sopmething to it as it cooks?)
      >
      >
      > my thanks
      >
      > Valete
      >
      > Marcus Cornelius Felix
      >
      Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66648 From: L Julia Aquila Date: 2009-06-11
      Subject: Re: Roman cookery II Request for Help
      Salve Felix,

      The link is here:

      http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Sodalis_Coq_et_Coq/

      --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Shoshana Hathaway" <shoshanahathaway@...> wrote:
      >
      > Salve Felix, et salvete omnes,
      >
      > I may be mistaken, but I do believe there are instructions for what you want
      > to do in our own cookery list. I *know* I've read posts concerning making
      > this, so if you are a member of that list, check the files and archives. If
      > you aren't, yet, you might want to consider joining. Tis a great list!
      >
      > Vale et valete bene,
      > C. Maria Caeca
      > ----- Original Message -----
      > From: "wuffa2001" <magewuffa@...>
      > To: <Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com>
      > Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2009 12:49 PM
      > Subject: [Nova-Roma] Roman cookery II Request for Help
      >
      >
      > > Salvete
      > >
      > > anyone who is working Roman cookery .
      > > I request your help.
      > >
      > > I want to make the following , and wish to know if anyone has done so and
      > > whats the best way to do.
      > >
      > > Defritum
      > >
      > > thick fig syrup ( should I just cook down some figs or do we add
      > > sopmething to it as it cooks?)
      > >
      > >
      > > my thanks
      > >
      > > Valete
      > >
      > > Marcus Cornelius Felix
      > >
      > >
      > >
      > >
      > >
      > >
      > > ------------------------------------
      > >
      > > Yahoo! Groups Links
      > >
      > >
      > >
      >
      >
      > --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      >
      >
      >
      > No virus found in this incoming message.
      > Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
      > Version: 8.5.339 / Virus Database: 270.12.63/2169 - Release Date: 06/11/09
      > 05:53:00
      >
      Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66649 From: Q. Valerius Poplicola Date: 2009-06-11
      Subject: Cato's law proposal (Was: Re: Intercessio - )
      Q. Poplicola Fl. Falacer Liviae Plautae:

      > First, we need to add a clause on what happens if the reus refuses to appear in court (see Cincinnatus' case). The roman solution would be to state that by not appearing he/she admits his/her guilt, so should be condemned. Otherwise there will be no coercing force to make people take the trial process seriously.

      I disagree. I think as long as someone is there to represent that person, it should be just fine.
      Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66650 From: L Julia Aquila Date: 2009-06-11
      Subject: Re: Roman cookery
      Salvete,

      Since Defritum this has been requested, I thought I would post this here also:

      Defritum (thick fig syrup)
      My Grandfather had an orchard and garden in his large yard in of all places Long Island NY, he even grew his own figs. He had a green thumb and was able to successfully grow warmer climate fruits, although the harvest time for the figs was very short. He grew very sweet large pear shape figs of a deepest purple almost black color with a deep red center may have been Negronne but I am not certain.
      For the "honey fig syrup" or miele di fichi, I think that is right, he would use the ripest figs, wash them very carefully (even though he only used natural insect control) keeping the skin intact and then boil them down until they were a thick syrup, about a third of the original volume. Low heat just to a slow simmer and stirring often.
      This would be used in Chicken recipes, Fish (Tuna), Veal and desserts, also with honey in a version of those sticky little nut (almond and pignoli) covered cooked dough balls – Strufoli?
      My Grandfather would also prepare some for use as a natural laxative but would be boiled to a slightly thicker consistency.

      A Greek version adds Bay Leaf to the cooking process.

      Valete,

      Julia

      --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "L Julia Aquila" <dis_pensible@...> wrote:
      >
      > Salve Jesse,
      >
      > Look through the thread in earlier posts and there are a few recipes and some that have been "converted" for modern use.
      > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma/message/63233
      > Try one of the cheesecakes. I intend to convert more as time permits!
      > Here is another link:
      > http://novaroma.org/nr/Category:Roman_cooking
      > And also we have a sodalitas dedicated to Roman food and drink:
      > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Sodalis_Coq_et_Coq/
      >
      > Congratulations on your daughters birth!
      >
      > Vale,
      > Julia
      >
      >
      > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Jesse Corradino <woden66@> wrote:
      > >
      > >
      > > Are there any genuinely tastey roman dishes? In the last year or so of my life I've committed myself to learn how to cook for two reasons: one, I'm pretty much the last member of my family to keep a lot of our recipes alive and two, I've recently had a daughter (Claudia) who I don't want to see grow up eating frozen food from a grocery store. Anyway, I really love the hobby and so now I'm always looking meals I can brag about. One of the reasons I was drawn to Nova Roma was to find out more about this topic, so I'm curious if anyone has some feedback :)
      > >
      >
      Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66651 From: livia_plauta Date: 2009-06-11
      Subject: Cato's law proposal (Was: Re: Intercessio - )
      Livia Plauta Valerio Poplicolae sal.

      You are right.
      So read: "If the reus refuses to appear in court and refuses to appoint a representative".

      Vale,
      Livia

      >
      > Q. Poplicola Fl. Falacer Liviae Plautae:
      >
      > > First, we need to add a clause on what happens if the reus refuses to appear in court (see Cincinnatus' case). The roman solution would be to state that by not appearing he/she admits his/her guilt, so should be condemned. Otherwise there will be no coercing force to make people take the trial process seriously.
      >
      > I disagree. I think as long as someone is there to represent that person, it should be just fine.
      >
      Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66652 From: Q. Valerius Poplicola Date: 2009-06-11
      Subject: Valid Intercessio
      Q. Valerius Poplicola Flamen Falacer Omnibus S. P. V. D.

      The Consul M. Complutensis has recently said that Agrippa's intercessio was invalid according to the Lex Didia de potesta tribunicia. Despite being unable to do so according to the Lex Arminia Equitia de Imperio III.B, the consul is still inaccurate when he describes the intercessio as invalid. From the Lex Didia Gemina de Potestate Tribunicia II.1, there are three requirements that a tribune must give.

      1. The official name(s) of the citizen(s) who has requested the Tribunus Plebis to issue the intercessio, or the official name(s) of the citizen(s) on whose behalf the Tribunus has provided auxilium ex officio.

      2. The official name and office of the magistrate(s) against whose act or acts the intercessio or auxilium has been interposed.

      3. The article(s) of the Constitution or the leges violated by the magistrate's act(s).

      Did Agrippa follow these three? Agrippa's intercessio is found here:

      http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma/message/66421

      In it he satisfies the requirements of the Lex Didia Gemina:

      "I pronounce intercessio against the custodes Marcus Lucretius Agricola and Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus in certifying the election of Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus as censor and against the consuls Marcus Iulius Severus and Marcus Cornelius Complutensis in accepting the election results."

      This sure satisfies the 2nd requirement. He listed the officials Agricola, Lentulus, Severus, and Complutensis, and their offices (custodes and consules).

      "This action was requested by Senator Gnaeus Iulius Caesar, Senator Lucius Cornelius Sulla Felix, Quintus Valerius Poplicola, and Marcus Valerius Potitus."

      This satisfies the first requirement by listing the citizens who requested this intercessio.

      "Modianus cannot hold the office of censor. This would violate Section 1 of the Lex Cornelia Iunia de definitione intervallorum magistratuum; "no person shall hold the office of censor consecutively" with Section IV A of the constitution as the definition of the term 'office of censor'.

      As the Lex Cornelia Iunia de definitione intervallorum magistratuum does not define the term 'office of censor', the Constitution is used by virtue of Section I B, giving precedence to the constitution as the highest legal authority."

      Here's the final requirement. He lists the both the law and the article of the constitution that they have violated by accepting the results.

      The Law has been met, and the intercessio is without a doubt valid.
      Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66653 From: iulius sabinus Date: 2009-06-11
      Subject: Re: Cato's law proposal (Was: Re: Intercessio - )
      SALVE ET SALVETE!
       
      --- On Thu, 6/11/09, Q. Valerius Poplicola <q.valerius.poplicola@...> wrote:

      > First, we need to add a clause on what happens if the reus refuses to appear in court (see Cincinnatus' case). The roman solution would be to state that by not appearing he/she admits his/her guilt, so should be condemned. Otherwise there will be no coercing force to make people take the trial process seriously.

      I disagree. I think as long as someone is there to represent that person, it should be just fine.>>>
      Yes, is correct. It should be just fine.
      VALETE,
      T. Iulius Sabinus


      Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66654 From: Q. Valerius Poplicola Date: 2009-06-11
      Subject: Re: Cato's law proposal (Was: Re: Intercessio - )
      Salve, Sabine.

      Thanks for agreeing with me. Simply put, either too much law or too little
      will strangle any society. We need a law, albeit a simple one. Simple,
      clear, and concise. That's what we need.

      --------------------------------------------------
      From: "iulius sabinus" <iulius_sabinus@...>
      Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2009 2:11 PM
      To: <Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com>
      Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Cato's law proposal (Was: Re: Intercessio - )

      > SALVE ET SALVETE!
      >
      >
      >
      >
      > --- On Thu, 6/11/09, Q. Valerius Poplicola
      > <q.valerius.poplicola@...> wrote:
      >
      >
      >
      >
      >
      >
      >
      >> First, we need to add a clause on what happens if the reus refuses to
      >> appear in court (see Cincinnatus' case). The roman solution would be to
      >> state that by not appearing he/she admits his/her guilt, so should be
      >> condemned. Otherwise there will be no coercing force to make people take
      >> the trial process seriously.
      >
      > I disagree. I think as long as someone is there to represent that person,
      > it should be just fine.>>>
      > Yes, is correct. It should be just fine.
      > VALETE,
      > T. Iulius Sabinus
      >
      >
      >
      >
      >
      >
      >
      >
      >
      >
      >
      >
      >
      >
      >
      >
      >
      >
      Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66655 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2009-06-11
      Subject: Cato's law proposal (Was: Re: Intercessio - )
      Cato Liviae Plautae Valerio Policolae omnibusque in foro SPD

      Salvete.

      With those comments in mind:

      "1. Any citizen may claim the right of provocatio against any other citizen (excepting a sitting magistrate) by appealing to the praetors.

      2. From the list of assidui, a panel of five iudices will be chosen by lot by the praetura within one nundinum (excepting dies nefasti and nefasti publici). The actor may dismiss up to three of those chosen with or without cause, and the praetura shall continue to choose by lots until the actor has either accepted the panel or has used up his three dismissals.

      3. The iudices will determine by majority vote whether or not there is merit to the case. If they decide it does, they will call a court into session on a List open to observance by all citizens within one nundinum. If they decide it does not, they will dismiss it and may offer some other method of reconcilement. The decision of the iudices is final.

      4. The praetura will then issue guidelines regarding the length of the trial, giving each side equal opportunity to present evidence and appointing a citizen from the panel of iudices who shall act as the moderator for the trial. No trial shall be less than one nundinum nor more than two nundini in length.

      5. The praetura shall be available for questions regarding the process of the trial and legal interpretation, but may not make any comment regarding the merits of the case while it is in process. Only the praetor, the iudices, the actor, and the reus (or the advocati if any) shall be allowed to speak in the court. Only the praetura shall make any public announcements regarding the trial.

      6. If the iudices decide in favor of the actor, they will pronounce a verdict. If the iudices decide in favor of the reus, the case is immediately dismissed. Verdicts may be moderation for any period of time (but not more than three months), a fine paid to the Aerarium (but not more than US$50 or the equivalent thereof), a combination of these, or banishment for a specific length of time. Verdicts pronounced by the iudices shall be final, excepting only cases in which the verdict is banishment for any length of time; in that case, the verdict shall be placed before the People for a vote in the comitia centuriata within one nundinum of the verdict being announced. In this case, the decision of the People shall be final.

      7. If a verdict is pronounced against the reus, he or she shall have one nunidinum to publicly announce their agreement; refusal to do so will result in moderation for a period of no less than one month and no more than three months, as decided by the praetura. Likewise, if the reus refuses to attend the court or select someone to stand for them, the iudices may pass summary judgement.

      8. Any part of this lex which requires action by any magistrate (the appointment of iudices, the calling of the comitia, etc.) shall be considered mandatory upon the magistracy involved; any failure to fulfill these requirements will be unequivocably considered legal dereliction of duty and will result in the magistrates involved being immediately removed from office, their offices declared vacant, and all century points awarded for holding that office being removed."

      I will note that rather than assuming the reus is guilty, I give the iudices the power to pass summary judgement rather than simply assume guilt - they should not be *forced* to decide that absence equals guilt.

      Valete,

      Cato
      Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66656 From: Gaius Petronius Dexter Date: 2009-06-11
      Subject: Re: Valid Intercessio
      C. Petronius Dexter omnibus s.p.d.,

      > Here's the final requirement.

      The law is not violated. Modianus did not hold the office of censor consecutively. First he was censor, now he is censor suffectus, and between we had as censor C. Popillius Laenas.

      Vale.

      C. Petronius Dexter
      Flamen Portunalis
      Quaestor Praetoris Cn. Equitii Marini
      Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66657 From: Titus Flavius Aquila Date: 2009-06-11
      Subject: AW: [Nova-Roma] Re: Intercessio not valid
      Salve Dexter,
       
      exactly .
       
      Why is it , that the out polled candidate and his supporters can not just agree to the fact.
       
      Modianus is our Censor Suffectus.
       
      In 6 months there are new elections and maybe a new chance for their candidate.
       
      Would the supporters of Modianus have reacted in such a way when Cato whould have won the Censor Suffectus election  ?
      No, we would have not. That is the difference !
       
      Optime vale
      Titus Flavius Aquila
       

       


      Von: Gaius Petronius Dexter <jfarnoud94@...>
      An: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
      Gesendet: Donnerstag, den 11. Juni 2009, 21:33:41 Uhr
      Betreff: [Nova-Roma] Re: Valid Intercessio

      C. Petronius Dexter omnibus s.p.d.,

      > Here's the final requirement.

      The law is not violated. Modianus did not hold the office of censor consecutively. First he was censor, now he is censor suffectus, and between we had as censor C. Popillius Laenas.

      Vale.

      C. Petronius Dexter
      Flamen Portunalis
      Quaestor Praetoris Cn. Equitii Marini


      Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66658 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2009-06-11
      Subject: Re: Valid Intercessio
      Yes, the law is.

      Let me refer you to this message:

      http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma/message/66452

      Cn. Iulius Caesar Cn. Equitio Marino SPD

      I beg to differ. Yes there are two differing views on "consecutive". The authors of the law both agreed this was exactly the sort of situation they had tried to prevent. The wording allows at face value for two viewpoints. However it hinged on the definition of "office of censor". The lex provided no definition. I have pointed out the Constitution defines office of Censor as ONE term of 24 months, and by its wording clearly does not divide that 24 month period into separate sections.

      To date no one has countered that interpretation of the Constitution, nor its power under Section 1.B to thus provide the missing definition in the lex. Nothing was decided Marine, the views to the contrary were ignored. Fine. So we ploughed on with an election. Unless you can refute the above, then the law is clear, he cannot stand and regardless of any vote in Comitia the law stands, for that is our system in Nova Roma. Inconvenient? Sure. A mess? Sure. That is not justification for ignoring the Constitution and the law. If the intercessio is over turned, fine. I'll live with that, but it won't make Modianus legally Censor. A vote in Comitia does not invalidate the law.

      As to the timing, well the Tribunes were not asked in time from the 72 hour period, but I think one made his views clear on both candidates and the whole election. The fact a veto did not happen at that time cannot therefore be taken to imply consent of the Tribunes at this mess, just that they were not approached in time. Now that option has been taken. As for the best time to veto, well perhaps the Consuls should have stepped back and de-registered him when the issue was raised to prevent this. I suspect that everyone thought that as the 72 hours had passed and the Tribunes couldn't veto, it was a done deal and we could all proceed merrily along regardless. Modianus may yet get to parade around claiming to be Censor, but this process is still a right that can be exercised. Better that than dutifully sign my name to something I believe to be illegal.

      The process of intercessio as laid down will take its course, and that is perfectly constitutional.

      Optime vale.

      --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Gaius Petronius Dexter" <jfarnoud94@...> wrote:
      >
      > C. Petronius Dexter omnibus s.p.d.,
      >
      > > Here's the final requirement.
      >
      > The law is not violated. Modianus did not hold the office of censor consecutively. First he was censor, now he is censor suffectus, and between we had as censor C. Popillius Laenas.
      >
      > Vale.
      >
      > C. Petronius Dexter
      > Flamen Portunalis
      > Quaestor Praetoris Cn. Equitii Marini
      >
      Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66659 From: livia_plauta Date: 2009-06-11
      Subject: Cato's law proposal (Was: Re: Intercessio - )
      Livia Plauta Equitio Catoni sal.

      I think the law is good and complete now. It just needs to be reviewed for Latin correctness (the plural of "nundinum" is "nundina", then it can be presented to the comitia.

      Vale,
      Livia
      >
      > Cato Liviae Plautae Valerio Policolae omnibusque in foro SPD
      >
      > Salvete.
      >
      > With those comments in mind:
      >
      > "1. Any citizen may claim the right of provocatio against any other citizen (excepting a sitting magistrate) by appealing to the praetors.
      >
      > 2. From the list of assidui, a panel of five iudices will be chosen by lot by the praetura within one nundinum (excepting dies nefasti and nefasti publici). The actor may dismiss up to three of those chosen with or without cause, and the praetura shall continue to choose by lots until the actor has either accepted the panel or has used up his three dismissals.
      >
      > 3. The iudices will determine by majority vote whether or not there is merit to the case. If they decide it does, they will call a court into session on a List open to observance by all citizens within one nundinum. If they decide it does not, they will dismiss it and may offer some other method of reconcilement. The decision of the iudices is final.
      >
      > 4. The praetura will then issue guidelines regarding the length of the trial, giving each side equal opportunity to present evidence and appointing a citizen from the panel of iudices who shall act as the moderator for the trial. No trial shall be less than one nundinum nor more than two nundini in length.
      >
      > 5. The praetura shall be available for questions regarding the process of the trial and legal interpretation, but may not make any comment regarding the merits of the case while it is in process. Only the praetor, the iudices, the actor, and the reus (or the advocati if any) shall be allowed to speak in the court. Only the praetura shall make any public announcements regarding the trial.
      >
      > 6. If the iudices decide in favor of the actor, they will pronounce a verdict. If the iudices decide in favor of the reus, the case is immediately dismissed. Verdicts may be moderation for any period of time (but not more than three months), a fine paid to the Aerarium (but not more than US$50 or the equivalent thereof), a combination of these, or banishment for a specific length of time. Verdicts pronounced by the iudices shall be final, excepting only cases in which the verdict is banishment for any length of time; in that case, the verdict shall be placed before the People for a vote in the comitia centuriata within one nundinum of the verdict being announced. In this case, the decision of the People shall be final.
      >
      > 7. If a verdict is pronounced against the reus, he or she shall have one nunidinum to publicly announce their agreement; refusal to do so will result in moderation for a period of no less than one month and no more than three months, as decided by the praetura. Likewise, if the reus refuses to attend the court or select someone to stand for them, the iudices may pass summary judgement.
      >
      > 8. Any part of this lex which requires action by any magistrate (the appointment of iudices, the calling of the comitia, etc.) shall be considered mandatory upon the magistracy involved; any failure to fulfill these requirements will be unequivocably considered legal dereliction of duty and will result in the magistrates involved being immediately removed from office, their offices declared vacant, and all century points awarded for holding that office being removed."
      >
      > I will note that rather than assuming the reus is guilty, I give the iudices the power to pass summary judgement rather than simply assume guilt - they should not be *forced* to decide that absence equals guilt.
      >
      > Valete,
      >
      > Cato
      >
      Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66660 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2009-06-11
      Subject: Re: Intercessio not valid
      Because as Caesar so eloquently stated:

      A vote in Comitia does not invalidate the law.

      Vale,

      Sulla

      --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Titus Flavius Aquila <titus.aquila@...> wrote:
      >
      > Salve Dexter,
      >
      > exactly .
      >
      > Why is it , that the out polled candidate and his supporters can not just agree to the fact.
      >
      > Modianus is our Censor Suffectus.
      >
      > In 6 months there are new elections and maybe a new chance for their candidate.
      >
      > Would the supporters of Modianus have reacted in such a way when Cato whould have won the Censor Suffectus election  ?
      > No, we would have not. That is the difference !
      >
      > Optime vale
      > Titus Flavius Aquila
      >
      >
      >  
      >
      >
      >
      > ________________________________
      > Von: Gaius Petronius Dexter <jfarnoud94@...>
      > An: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
      > Gesendet: Donnerstag, den 11. Juni 2009, 21:33:41 Uhr
      > Betreff: [Nova-Roma] Re: Valid Intercessio
      >
      >
      >
      >
      >
      > C. Petronius Dexter omnibus s.p.d.,
      >
      > > Here's the final requirement.
      >
      > The law is not violated. Modianus did not hold the office of censor consecutively. First he was censor, now he is censor suffectus, and between we had as censor C. Popillius Laenas.
      >
      > Vale.
      >
      > C. Petronius Dexter
      > Flamen Portunalis
      > Quaestor Praetoris Cn. Equitii Marini
      >
      Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66661 From: Q. Valerius Poplicola Date: 2009-06-11
      Subject: Re: Valid Intercessio
      Q. Valerius C. Petronio:

      You, Dexter, are not the one who can say whether the law has been violated.
      Nor can anyone but another tribune legally counter a valid intercessio by a
      tribune.

      Vale.

      Quintus Valerius Poplicola
      Flamen Falacer
      Quaestor Aedilium Curulum
      Scriba Censorum
      Scriba Aedilium Plebis

      --------------------------------------------------
      From: "Gaius Petronius Dexter" <jfarnoud94@...>
      Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2009 2:33 PM
      To: <Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com>
      Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Valid Intercessio

      > C. Petronius Dexter omnibus s.p.d.,
      >
      >> Here's the final requirement.
      >
      > The law is not violated. Modianus did not hold the office of censor
      > consecutively. First he was censor, now he is censor suffectus, and
      > between we had as censor C. Popillius Laenas.
      >
      > Vale.
      >
      > C. Petronius Dexter
      > Flamen Portunalis
      > Quaestor Praetoris Cn. Equitii Marini
      >
      >
      >
      >
      Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66662 From: Gaius Petronius Dexter Date: 2009-06-11
      Subject: Re: Valid Intercessio
      C. Petronius Sullae,

      >>Yes, the law is.

      No, indeed, it is not.

      If the law use the word consecutively, we all must hear in consecutively the meaning of the word. Consecutively is coming from the Latin consequor.

      Modianus does not succeed himself, as "consecutively" means, but he succeed C. Popillius Laenas.

      So the law is absolutely not violated.

      Vale.
      C. Petronius Dexter
      Flamen Portunalis
      Quaestor Praetoris Cn. Equitii Marini
      Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66663 From: QFabiusMaxmi@aol.com Date: 2009-06-11
      Subject: Re: Valid Intercessio
      In a message dated 6/11/2009 12:54:49 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time, q.valerius.poplicola@... writes:
      You, Dexter, are not the one who can say whether the law has been violated.
      You are welcome to your opinion of course.  Remember the Constitution is the rule set of this organization, and it clearly spells out what a Censor's term of office is.  Just because you don't want to accept it, that's not the Constitution's problem. 
       
      Q. Fabius Maximus 
      Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66664 From: Q. Valerius Poplicola Date: 2009-06-11
      Subject: Re: Valid Intercessio
      He's not "succeeding" Laenas' term with a term of his own. He's replacing Laenas who succeeded Modianus. In effect termwise he would be succeeding himself, and that is against the law.

      Regardless, it doesn't matter. The tribunes have issued a valid intercessio against the acceptance of Modianus as censor. You are not legally able to gainsay him except with the fine of 30 American dollars.

      Poplicola

      --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Gaius Petronius Dexter" <jfarnoud94@...> wrote:
      >
      >
      > C. Petronius Sullae,
      >
      > >>Yes, the law is.
      >
      > No, indeed, it is not.
      >
      > If the law use the word consecutively, we all must hear in consecutively the meaning of the word. Consecutively is coming from the Latin consequor.
      >
      > Modianus does not succeed himself, as "consecutively" means, but he succeed C. Popillius Laenas.
      >
      > So the law is absolutely not violated.
      >
      > Vale.
      > C. Petronius Dexter
      > Flamen Portunalis
      > Quaestor Praetoris Cn. Equitii Marini
      >
      Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66665 From: Gnaeus Iulius Caesar Date: 2009-06-11
      Subject: Re: Cato's law proposal (Was: Re: Intercessio - )
      Cn. Iulius Caesar SPD.

      Not quite to my mind (and there maybe more issues).

      Define provocatio. When does it apply? What criteria has to exist? One person's provocatio is not another's definition. It is appropriate to have people decide the facts of a matter but not to decide whether an "offence" for want of a better word has been committed.

      You should specify limits on what will and wont be a matter for a court. An open writ to having anything thrust in front of a tribunal is not a good idea. There are matters Nova Roma need not and should not concern itself with. The only issues that need to be dealt with are:

      1. Magisterial abuse
      2. Electronic harrasment
      3. Electoral fraud.

      Why only these three? Because anything else takes Nova Roma right back into the mire of pseudo trials which it is singuarly ill-equipped for on so many levels. The above would be the only areas that Noav Roma could be said to have some form of responsibility for regulating behavior. issues of behavioural breakdowns on public lists can be subject of fixed and prescribed warnings and moderation, leading to withdrawal of posting rights again for fixed periods. We really don't need to get into the business of who said what to whom in a 'trial" setting.

      What about exclusions? Such as when one performs a duty required by another lex? who decides that the action meets the tes of what is currently defined as lawful excuse?

      You can't do away with an appeal process for anything apart from banishment. That is inherently unjust. However what you could offer I would suggest is an option for a reduced penalty to expedite matters and a voluntary agreement to forgoe the right of provocatio. If you define the penalties in a fixed manner instead of this rather open ended approach, then you can have a sliding scale. If both parties elect for a hearing in front of one praetor, with no iuudices, then a very limited penalty range. If in front of iudices with the right of provocatio foregone by one party, then if that party is found in favour of and is the reus, then the penalty should be still less than the full range, but higher than if just in front of a praetor. If a party is found against and has not forgone provocatio as a right then the full penalty should be applied. This would encourage faster, quicker hearings with less risk.


      Optime valete


      --- On Thu, 6/11/09, livia_plauta <livia.plauta@...> wrote:

      > From: livia_plauta <livia.plauta@...>
      > Subject: [Nova-Roma] Cato's law proposal (Was: Re: Intercessio - )
      > To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
      > Date: Thursday, June 11, 2009, 1:48 PM
      > Livia Plauta Equitio Catoni sal.
      >
      > I think the law is good and complete now. It just needs to
      > be reviewed for Latin correctness (the plural of "nundinum"
      Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66666 From: Q. Valerius Poplicola Date: 2009-06-11
      Subject: Poplicola's Law Proposal (Not Cato's)
      Seeing Cato's posted today made me want to produce my own which I had been writing up on the suggestion of several members. It's not perfect, but may be complimentary to Cato's suggestion. Any and all improvements are requested.

      ===============================================

      Corrective Procedure:

      Latin Definitions:

      • Actor: one who requests praetorian action
      • Civis: an assiduus member of Nova Roma, Inc.
      • Reus: the one who against whom praetorian actions requested

      1. All Nova Roma cives are expected without exception to follow all of the rules which they are bound to;

      2. In the case of violation of these rules, the praetors can be called upon by any civis to rectify the said violation, unless the violator is a magistrate, in which the tribunes should then pronounce an intercessio on that magistrate's action;

      a. If no intercessio was pronounced, after the magistrate's term has ended, praetorian action can then be called.

      3. The praetors have one to determine whether a case for the violation has been made. If by the end of the week no decision was made, the praetors must either extend the investigation by one more week or summon a jury of six by lots for them to determine whether a case is actionable. The jurors can be dismissed by either the actor or reus for up to two dismissals each, and the praetors will continue to select jury members by lots until both actor and reus agree or until each have used up their two allotted dismissals.

      a. In the case that the actor or the reus is represented by another, their representative shall have the rights of dismissal.

      5. The jury then must on the instructions of the praetors determine whether the case for a crime should continue.

      a. Four of the six jurors must vote for the case for it to continue.

      4. If a case is actionable, the praetors will summon a jury of 10 by lots to determine whether a violation has actually occurred. The jurors can be dismissed by either the actor or reus for up to three dismissals each, and the praetors will continue to select jury members by lots until both actor and reus agree or until each have used up their three allotted dismissals.

      a. In the case that the actor or the reus is represented by another, their representative shall have the rights of dismissal.

      5. The jury then must on the instructions of the praetors determine whether the reus has actually committed a violation.

      a. Seven of the ten jurors must vote against the reus for the reus to be convicted.

      5. If the case is not actionable or the case was dismissed, the praetor must issue an edict clearing the name of the reus.

      6. Nothing in this lex shall be construed as constraining any cives of Nova Roma from seeking macronational redress for actions which constitute offences under macronational law.
      Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66667 From: Q. Valerius Poplicola Date: 2009-06-11
      Subject: Re: Intercessio not valid
      Cato did not violate the law by running for Censor. Modianus did.

      THAT'S the difference.

      --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Titus Flavius Aquila <titus.aquila@...> wrote:
      >
      > Salve Dexter,
      >
      > exactly .
      >
      > Why is it , that the out polled candidate and his supporters can not just agree to the fact.
      >
      > Modianus is our Censor Suffectus.
      >
      > In 6 months there are new elections and maybe a new chance for their candidate.
      >
      > Would the supporters of Modianus have reacted in such a way when Cato whould have won the Censor Suffectus election  ?
      > No, we would have not. That is the difference !
      >
      > Optime vale
      > Titus Flavius Aquila
      >
      >
      >  
      >
      >
      >
      > ________________________________
      > Von: Gaius Petronius Dexter <jfarnoud94@...>
      > An: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
      > Gesendet: Donnerstag, den 11. Juni 2009, 21:33:41 Uhr
      > Betreff: [Nova-Roma] Re: Valid Intercessio
      >
      >
      >
      >
      >
      > C. Petronius Dexter omnibus s.p.d.,
      >
      > > Here's the final requirement.
      >
      > The law is not violated. Modianus did not hold the office of censor consecutively. First he was censor, now he is censor suffectus, and between we had as censor C. Popillius Laenas.
      >
      > Vale.
      >
      > C. Petronius Dexter
      > Flamen Portunalis
      > Quaestor Praetoris Cn. Equitii Marini
      >
      Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66668 From: iulius sabinus Date: 2009-06-11
      Subject: Re: Cato's law proposal (Was: Re: Intercessio - )
      SALVE!

      --- On Thu, 6/11/09, Q. Valerius Poplicola <q.valerius.poplicola@...> wrote:

      Thanks for agreeing with me. >>>
      With pleasure.
      Simply put, either too much law or too little will strangle any society. We need a law, albeit a simple one. Simple, clear, and concise. That's what we need.>>>
      I know. We really have people with good abilities to contribute at this point and who, during the time, demonstrated their pragmatism. Cato, Pompeia, Caesar, Marinus are a few of them but are many other.
      VALE BENE,
      T. Iulius Sabinus
      ------------ --------- --------- --------- --------- --
      From: "iulius sabinus" <iulius_sabinus@ yahoo.com>
      Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2009 2:11 PM
      To: <Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com>
      Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Cato's law proposal (Was: Re: Intercessio - )

      > SALVE ET SALVETE!
      >
      >
      >
      >
      > --- On Thu, 6/11/09, Q. Valerius Poplicola
      > <q.valerius.poplicol a@...> wrote:
      >
      >
      >> First, we need to add a clause on what happens if the reus refuses to
      >> appear in court (see Cincinnatus' case). The roman solution would be to
      >> state that by not appearing he/she admits his/her guilt, so should be
      >> condemned. Otherwise there will be no coercing force to make people take
      >> the trial process seriously.
      >
      > I disagree. I think as long as someone is there to represent that person,
      > it should be just fine.>>>
      > Yes, is correct. It should be just fine.
      > VALETE,
      > T. Iulius Sabinus
      Recent Activity
      Visit Your Group
      Yahoo! News
      Breaking news to
      entertainment news
      Drive Traffic
      can help increase
      your site traffic.
      Yahoo! Groups
      Join others who
      are losing pounds.
      .


      Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66669 From: QFabiusMaxmi@aol.com Date: 2009-06-11
      Subject: Re: Valid Intercessio
      In a message dated 6/11/2009 1:04:21 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time, jfarnoud94@... writes:
      Modianus does not succeed himself, as "consecutively" means, but he succeed C. Popillius Laenas.

      So the law is absolutely not violated
      Dude!  How long have you been in NR?  The Constitution refers to the "Term"  Not the man.
      Consecutive terms.  This is not Rome.  As much as we all want it to be.
       
      Q. Fabius Maximus
      Group: Nova-Roma Message: 66670 From: Gnaeus Iulius Caesar Date: 2009-06-11
      Subject: Re: Cato's law proposal (Was: Re: Intercessio - )
      Cn. Iulius Caesar SPD

      And further - both parties should bear a risk. If you bring a case as the actor, and you lose, you get the same range of penalties applied that would have been to the reus. A shared risk may lead to some of these matters being settled off list in an adult fashion without the necessity for a hearing.

      Optime valete


      --- On Thu, 6/11/09, Gnaeus Iulius Caesar <gn_iulius_caesar@...> wrote:

      > From: Gnaeus Iulius Caesar <gn_iulius_caesar@...>
      > Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Cato's law proposal (Was: Re: Intercessio - )
      > To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
      > Date: Thursday, June 11, 2009, 2:09 PM