Selected messages in Nova-Roma group. Jun 20-21, 2009

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67547 From: Diana Octavia Aventina Date: 2009-06-20
Subject: Regrets
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67548 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2009-06-20
Subject: Re: Modianus was elected Censor by the people
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67549 From: Timothy or Stephen Gallagher Date: 2009-06-20
Subject: Coming soon to Nova Roma: A new method to get rid of ones collective
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67550 From: David Kling Date: 2009-06-20
Subject: Re: Modianus was elected Censor by the people
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67551 From: David Kling Date: 2009-06-20
Subject: Re: Coming soon to Nova Roma: A new method to get rid of ones collec
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67552 From: Publius Memmius Albucius Date: 2009-06-20
Subject: Tb Marcellus' position on the pending veto - reminder
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67553 From: Timothy or Stephen Gallagher Date: 2009-06-20
Subject: Re: Coming soon to Nova Roma: A new method to get rid of ones colle
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67554 From: David Kling Date: 2009-06-20
Subject: Re: Tb Marcellus' position on the pending veto - reminder
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67555 From: marcushoratius Date: 2009-06-20
Subject: a. d. XII Kalendas Quinctilias: Summano in Circo Maximo
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67556 From: Publius Ullerius Stephanus Venator Date: 2009-06-20
Subject: New Acropolis Museum
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67557 From: Q. Valerius Poplicola Date: 2009-06-20
Subject: Re: Protecting Our Votes and Future Elections
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67558 From: Q. Valerius Poplicola Date: 2009-06-20
Subject: Re: Protecting Our Votes and Future Elections
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67559 From: Q. Valerius Poplicola Date: 2009-06-20
Subject: Re: Protecting Our Votes and Future Elections
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67560 From: Q. Valerius Poplicola Date: 2009-06-20
Subject: Re: Digest Number 4586 - Some observations from the peanut gallery
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67561 From: Gaius Vipsanius Agrippa Date: 2009-06-20
Subject: Witnessing of appointment of L. Coruncanius Cato as Aedilis Curulis
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67562 From: David Kling Date: 2009-06-20
Subject: Re: Protecting Our Votes and Future Elections
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67563 From: Gnaeus Iulius Caesar Date: 2009-06-20
Subject: Re: Protecting Our Votes and Future Elections
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67564 From: David Kling Date: 2009-06-20
Subject: Re: Protecting Our Votes and Future Elections
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67565 From: Gnaeus Iulius Caesar Date: 2009-06-20
Subject: Re: Protecting Our Votes and Future Elections
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67566 From: David Kling Date: 2009-06-20
Subject: Re: Protecting Our Votes and Future Elections
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67567 From: Gnaeus Iulius Caesar Date: 2009-06-20
Subject: Re: Protecting Our Votes and Future Elections
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67568 From: Q. Valerius Poplicola Date: 2009-06-20
Subject: Re: Protecting Our Votes and Future Elections
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67569 From: David Kling Date: 2009-06-20
Subject: Re: Protecting Our Votes and Future Elections
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67570 From: Publius Ullerius Stephanus Venator Date: 2009-06-20
Subject: Venator, future, Censorial candidacy
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67571 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2009-06-20
Subject: Re: Protecting Our Votes and Future Elections
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67572 From: David Kling Date: 2009-06-20
Subject: Re: Protecting Our Votes and Future Elections
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67573 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2009-06-20
Subject: Re: Protecting Our Votes and Future Elections
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67574 From: David Kling Date: 2009-06-20
Subject: Re: Protecting Our Votes and Future Elections
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67575 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2009-06-20
Subject: Re: Protecting Our Votes and Future Elections
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67576 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2009-06-20
Subject: Re: Protecting Our Votes and Future Elections
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67577 From: C. Maria Caeca Date: 2009-06-20
Subject: Re: Venator, future, Censorial candidacy
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67578 From: Gnaeus Iulius Caesar Date: 2009-06-20
Subject: Re: Protecting Our Votes and Future Elections
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67579 From: Timothy or Stephen Gallagher Date: 2009-06-20
Subject: Re: Venator, future, Censorial candidacy
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67580 From: Maior Date: 2009-06-20
Subject: Re: Regrets
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67581 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2009-06-20
Subject: Re: Protecting Our Votes and Future Elections
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67582 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2009-06-20
Subject: Re: Venator, future, Censorial candidacy
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67583 From: David Kling Date: 2009-06-20
Subject: Re: Protecting Our Votes and Future Elections
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67584 From: C. Maria Caeca Date: 2009-06-20
Subject: Re: Some questions now that I have peace of mind...
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67585 From: Maior Date: 2009-06-20
Subject: Re: Roman Clothing [was ; Some questions now that I have peace o
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67586 From: Maior Date: 2009-06-20
Subject: Colonia Nova Roma
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67587 From: Maior Date: 2009-06-20
Subject: Re: nova roma is syncretic
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67588 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2009-06-20
Subject: Re: nova roma is syncretic
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67589 From: David Kling Date: 2009-06-20
Subject: Re: nova roma is syncretic
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67590 From: Steve Moore Date: 2009-06-20
Subject: Re: Digest Number 4586 - Some observations from the peanut gallery
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67591 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2009-06-20
Subject: Re: nova roma is syncretic
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67592 From: Maior Date: 2009-06-20
Subject: Re: nova roma is syncretic
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67593 From: A. Sempronius Regulus Date: 2009-06-20
Subject: Re: nova roma is syncretic
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67594 From: livia_plauta Date: 2009-06-20
Subject: Re: Protecting Our Votes and Future Elections
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67595 From: David Kling Date: 2009-06-20
Subject: Re: nova roma is syncretic
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67596 From: A. Sempronius Regulus Date: 2009-06-20
Subject: Re: nova roma is syncretic
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67597 From: livia_plauta Date: 2009-06-20
Subject: Re: Some questions now that I have peace of mind...
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67598 From: Maior Date: 2009-06-20
Subject: Re: nova roma is syncretic
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67599 From: livia_plauta Date: 2009-06-20
Subject: Re: Digest Number 4586 - Some observations from the peanut gallery
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67600 From: Kirsteen Wright Date: 2009-06-20
Subject: Re: nova roma is syncretic
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67601 From: violetphearsen@yahoo.com Date: 2009-06-20
Subject: Re: Protecting Our Votes and Future Elections
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67602 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2009-06-20
Subject: Re: nova roma is syncretic
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67603 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2009-06-20
Subject: Re: Colonia Nova Roma
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67604 From: QFabiusMaxmi@aol.com Date: 2009-06-20
Subject: Re: passing Imperium
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67605 From: violetphearsen@yahoo.com Date: 2009-06-20
Subject: Re: Regrets
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67606 From: Maior Date: 2009-06-20
Subject: Re: Protecting Our Votes and Future Elections
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67607 From: Maior Date: 2009-06-20
Subject: Re: Colonia Nova Roma
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67608 From: Maxima Valeria Messallina Date: 2009-06-20
Subject: Re: Colonia Nova Roma
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67609 From: C. Maria Caeca Date: 2009-06-20
Subject: Re: Colonia Nova Roma
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67610 From: Aqvillivs Rota Date: 2009-06-20
Subject: Re: Colonia Nova Roma
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67611 From: n_apollonius_quadratus Date: 2009-06-20
Subject: Re: Regrets
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67612 From: n_apollonius_quadratus Date: 2009-06-20
Subject: Re: Digest Number 4586 - Some observations from the peanut gallery
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67613 From: n_apollonius_quadratus Date: 2009-06-20
Subject: Re: Colonia Nova Roma
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67614 From: Q. Valerius Poplicola Date: 2009-06-20
Subject: Re: nova roma is syncretic
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67615 From: n_apollonius_quadratus Date: 2009-06-20
Subject: Re: Some questions now that I have peace of mind...
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67616 From: Q. Valerius Poplicola Date: 2009-06-20
Subject: Re: nova roma is syncretic
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67617 From: L Julia Aquila Date: 2009-06-20
Subject: Re: Colonia Nova Roma
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67618 From: gualterus_graecus Date: 2009-06-20
Subject: Re: nova roma is syncretic
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67619 From: QFabiusMaxmi@aol.com Date: 2009-06-20
Subject: Re: Digest Number 4586 - Some observations from the peanut ga...
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67620 From: Steve Moore Date: 2009-06-20
Subject: Re: Digest Number 4586 - Some observations from the peanut gallery
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67621 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2009-06-20
Subject: Witness
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67622 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2009-06-20
Subject: Re: Protecting Our Votes and Future Elections
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67623 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2009-06-20
Subject: Re: nova roma is syncretic
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67624 From: Maior Date: 2009-06-20
Subject: Re: Colonia Nova Roma
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67625 From: Q. Valerius Poplicola Date: 2009-06-20
Subject: Re: Digest Number 4586 - Some observations from the peanut gallery
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67626 From: Q. Valerius Poplicola Date: 2009-06-20
Subject: Re: Protecting Our Votes and Future Elections
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67627 From: gurupoetess Date: 2009-06-20
Subject: Re: Protecting Our Votes and Future Elections
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67628 From: Maior Date: 2009-06-20
Subject: Re: Digest Number 4586 - Some observations from the peanut gallery
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67629 From: C. Maria Caeca Date: 2009-06-20
Subject: Nova Roman women
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67630 From: Maior Date: 2009-06-20
Subject: Re: nova roma is syncretic
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67631 From: A. Sempronius Regulus Date: 2009-06-20
Subject: Father's Day and [Nova-Roma] Nova Roman women
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67632 From: Maior Date: 2009-06-20
Subject: Re: Protecting Our Votes and Future Elections
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67633 From: Q. Valerius Poplicola Date: 2009-06-20
Subject: Re: nova roma is syncretic
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67634 From: Maior Date: 2009-06-20
Subject: Re: nova roma is syncretic
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67635 From: C. Maria Caeca Date: 2009-06-20
Subject: Re: Father's Day and [Nova-Roma] Nova Roman women
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67636 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2009-06-20
Subject: Re: Protecting Our Votes and Future Elections
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67637 From: Maior Date: 2009-06-20
Subject: Re: Father's Day and [Nova-Roma] Nova Roman women
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67638 From: gualterus_graecus Date: 2009-06-20
Subject: NR Identity a Fantasy Construct? (was: Re: nova roma is syncretic)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67639 From: Robert Levee Date: 2009-06-20
Subject: My Statement of Opposition to the Intercessio!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67640 From: M. Lucretius Agricola Date: 2009-06-20
Subject: NR Identity a Fantasy Construct? (was: Re: nova roma is syncretic)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67641 From: Gnaeus Iulius Caesar Date: 2009-06-20
Subject: Re: My Statement of Opposition to the Intercessio!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67642 From: Gnaeus Iulius Caesar Date: 2009-06-20
Subject: Re: My Statement of Opposition to the Intercessio!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67643 From: Robert Levee Date: 2009-06-20
Subject: Re: My Statement of Opposition to the Intercessio!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67644 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2009-06-20
Subject: NR Identity a Fantasy Construct? (was: Re: nova roma is syncretic)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67645 From: Gnaeus Iulius Caesar Date: 2009-06-20
Subject: Re: My Statement of Opposition to the Intercessio!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67646 From: ellencatalina Date: 2009-06-21
Subject: Re: nova roma is syncretic
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67647 From: Steve Moore Date: 2009-06-21
Subject: Request for Image of a Seiugis
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67648 From: n_apollonius_quadratus Date: 2009-06-21
Subject: Re: Digest Number 4586 - Some observations from the peanut gallery
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67649 From: n_apollonius_quadratus Date: 2009-06-21
Subject: Re: Digest Number 4586 - Some observations from the peanut gallery
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67650 From: Q. Valerius Poplicola Date: 2009-06-21
Subject: Re: nova roma is syncretic
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67651 From: gualterus_graecus Date: 2009-06-21
Subject: NR Identity a Fantasy Construct? (was: Re: nova roma is syncretic)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67652 From: Q. Valerius Poplicola Date: 2009-06-21
Subject: Re: Digest Number 4586 - Some observations from the peanut gallery
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67653 From: Timothy or Stephen Gallagher Date: 2009-06-21
Subject: Misogynistic?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67654 From: n_apollonius_quadratus Date: 2009-06-21
Subject: Hm, Roman stuff...
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67655 From: gualterus_graecus Date: 2009-06-21
Subject: Re: nova roma is syncretic
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67656 From: wuffa2001 Date: 2009-06-21
Subject: Re: Protecting Our Votes and Future Elections
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67657 From: Steve Moore Date: 2009-06-21
Subject: Re: Digest Number 4586 - Some observations from the peanut gallery
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67658 From: gualterus_graecus Date: 2009-06-21
Subject: Call for Papers
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67659 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2009-06-21
Subject: Re: Venator, future, Censorial candidacy
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67660 From: n_apollonius_quadratus Date: 2009-06-21
Subject: Re: Digest Number 4586 - Some observations from the peanut gallery
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67661 From: n_apollonius_quadratus Date: 2009-06-21
Subject: Re: Protecting Our Votes and Future Elections
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67662 From: n_apollonius_quadratus Date: 2009-06-21
Subject: Re: Digest Number 4586 - Some observations from the peanut gallery
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67663 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2009-06-21
Subject: Re: Colonia Nova Roma
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67664 From: Q. Valerius Poplicola Date: 2009-06-21
Subject: Re: nova roma is syncretic
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67665 From: Q. Valerius Poplicola Date: 2009-06-21
Subject: Re: Digest Number 4586 - Some observations from the peanut gallery
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67666 From: n_apollonius_quadratus Date: 2009-06-21
Subject: Re: Digest Number 4586 - Some observations from the peanut gallery
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67667 From: Q. Valerius Poplicola Date: 2009-06-21
Subject: Re: Digest Number 4586 - Some observations from the peanut gallery
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67668 From: Kirsteen Wright Date: 2009-06-21
Subject: Re: Protecting Our Votes and Future Elections
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67669 From: n_apollonius_quadratus Date: 2009-06-21
Subject: Re: Digest Number 4586 - Some observations from the peanut gallery
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67670 From: Q. Valerius Poplicola Date: 2009-06-21
Subject: Re: Protecting Our Votes and Future Elections
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67671 From: David Kling Date: 2009-06-21
Subject: Re: Digest Number 4586 - Some observations from the peanut gallery
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67672 From: marcushoratius Date: 2009-06-21
Subject: a. d. XI Kalendas Quinctalias: Battle of Lake Transimene
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67673 From: David Kling Date: 2009-06-21
Subject: Appointment of Scribes
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67674 From: Maxima Valeria Messallina Date: 2009-06-21
Subject: Re: Regrets
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67675 From: Maxima Valeria Messallina Date: 2009-06-21
Subject: Re: Protecting Our Votes and Future Elections
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67676 From: Maxima Valeria Messallina Date: 2009-06-21
Subject: Re: Protecting Our Votes and Future Elections
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67677 From: Maxima Valeria Messallina Date: 2009-06-21
Subject: Re: Protecting Our Votes and Future Elections
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67678 From: C. Maria Caeca Date: 2009-06-21
Subject: Re: Protecting Our Votes and Future Elections
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67679 From: Q. Valerius Poplicola Date: 2009-06-21
Subject: Re: Digest Number 4586 - Some observations from the peanut gallery
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67680 From: wuffa2001 Date: 2009-06-21
Subject: ok i done fighting
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67681 From: Steve Moore Date: 2009-06-21
Subject: Re: Digest Number 4586 - Some observations from the peanut gallery
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67682 From: lathyrus77 Date: 2009-06-21
Subject: Re: Digest Number 4586 - Some observations from the peanut gallery
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67683 From: violetphearsen@yahoo.com Date: 2009-06-21
Subject: Re: Protecting Our Votes and Future Elections
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67684 From: C. Maria Caeca Date: 2009-06-21
Subject: question for the Magistrates and Senate
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67685 From: Kirsteen Wright Date: 2009-06-21
Subject: Re: Protecting Our Votes and Future Elections
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67686 From: Steve Moore Date: 2009-06-21
Subject: Re: Digest Number 4586 - Some observations from the peanut gallery
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67687 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2009-06-21
Subject: Re: Digest Number 4586 - Some observations from the peanut gallery
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67688 From: lathyrus77 Date: 2009-06-21
Subject: Re: Digest Number 4586 - Some observations from the peanut gallery
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67689 From: Maior Date: 2009-06-21
Subject: NR Identity a Fantasy Construct? (was: Re: nova roma is syncretic)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67690 From: lathyrus77 Date: 2009-06-21
Subject: Re: Digest Number 4586 - Some observations from the peanut gallery
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67691 From: QFabiusMaxmi@aol.com Date: 2009-06-21
Subject: Re: Hm, Roman stuff...
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67692 From: Steve Moore Date: 2009-06-21
Subject: Edictum IV of the Governor of America Austroccidentalis
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67693 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2009-06-21
Subject: Re: Digest Number 4586 - Some observations from the peanut gallery
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67694 From: lathyrus77 Date: 2009-06-21
Subject: Re: Digest Number 4586 - Some observations from the peanut gallery
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67695 From: Titus Flavius Aquila Date: 2009-06-21
Subject: AW: [NovaRoma-Announce] Appointment of Scribes
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67696 From: gualterus_graecus Date: 2009-06-21
Subject: NR Identity a Fantasy Construct? (was: Re: nova roma is syncretic)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67697 From: violetphearsen@yahoo.com Date: 2009-06-21
Subject: Re: Best Wishes on the Vestalia
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67699 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2009-06-21
Subject: Re: Digest Number 4586 - Some observations from the peanut gallery
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67700 From: Publius Ullerius Stephanus Venator Date: 2009-06-21
Subject: Re: NR Identity a Fantasy Construct? (was: Re: nova roma is syncreti
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67701 From: lathyrus77 Date: 2009-06-21
Subject: Re: Digest Number 4586 - Some observations from the peanut gallery
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67702 From: gualterus_graecus Date: 2009-06-21
Subject: NR Identity a Fantasy Construct? (was: Re: nova roma is syncretic)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67703 From: Q. Valerius Poplicola Date: 2009-06-21
Subject: Re: Digest Number 4586 - Some observations from the peanut gallery
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67704 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2009-06-21
Subject: Re: Digest Number 4586 - Some observations from the peanut gallery
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67705 From: David Kling Date: 2009-06-21
Subject: Appointment of Scribe - Gaius Petronius Dexter
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67706 From: Q. Valerius Poplicola Date: 2009-06-21
Subject: Re: Digest Number 4586 - Some observations from the peanut gallery
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67707 From: lathyrus77 Date: 2009-06-21
Subject: Re: Digest Number 4586 - Some observations from the peanut gallery
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67708 From: lathyrus77 Date: 2009-06-21
Subject: Re: Digest Number 4586 - Some observations from the peanut gallery
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67709 From: lathyrus77 Date: 2009-06-21
Subject: Re: Digest Number 4586 - Some observations from the peanut gallery
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67710 From: M·CVR·COMPLVTENSIS Date: 2009-06-21
Subject: Re: My Statement of Opposition to the Intercessio!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67711 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2009-06-21
Subject: Re: Digest Number 4586 - Some observations from the peanut gallery
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67712 From: Maior Date: 2009-06-21
Subject: NR Identity Reality or Fantasy Construct? (was: Re: nova roma is sy
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67713 From: Gnaeus Iulius Caesar Date: 2009-06-21
Subject: Re: My Statement of Opposition to the Intercessio!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67714 From: Publius Ullerius Stephanus Venator Date: 2009-06-21
Subject: Re: NR Identity a Fantasy Construct? (was: Re: nova roma is syncreti
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67715 From: A. Sempronius Regulus Date: 2009-06-21
Subject: Re: nova roma is syncretic
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67716 From: Gnaeus Iulius Caesar Date: 2009-06-21
Subject: Re: My Statement of Opposition to the Intercessio!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67717 From: A. Sempronius Regulus Date: 2009-06-21
Subject: Re: Modianus was elected Censor by the people
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67718 From: Q. Valerius Poplicola Date: 2009-06-21
Subject: Re: Digest Number 4586 - Some observations from the peanut gallery
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67719 From: Q. Valerius Poplicola Date: 2009-06-21
Subject: Re: My Statement of Opposition to the Intercessio!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67720 From: L Julia Aquila Date: 2009-06-21
Subject: Re: nova roma is syncretic
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67721 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2009-06-21
Subject: Re: nova roma is syncretic
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67722 From: Maior Date: 2009-06-21
Subject: Re: nova roma is syncretic
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67723 From: lathyrus77 Date: 2009-06-21
Subject: Re: Digest Number 4586 - Some observations from the peanut gallery



Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67547 From: Diana Octavia Aventina Date: 2009-06-20
Subject: Regrets
Salvete all (and especially our Vestal virgin),

You know, I've said a lot of rude things to people over the years, and there
is only one thing that keeps replaying over and over in my mind that I
really really regret- and those were the horribly rude comments that I made
about our Vestal virgin in the BA. I won't repeat them, because I cringe
everytime I think of them. Someone hit the nail on the head when they said
that I made those comments just as I would have made a comment about a
catholic priest. I didn't think of a person as a Vestal virgin. I just
spontaneously and stupidly wrote 2 nasty things in a row. Then once I saw
that our Vestal virgin was upset, it hit me that I was actually commented
rudely about a real flesh and blood woman whom I always liked and who was
always very sweet to me.. Then the reality set in and I thought "What kind
of diarhea has been flowing out of my mouth for the last few years?". I
would never ever say anything so hurtful in real life to anyone. In fact, I
always go out of my way to say nice things to people....

So once again I am extremely & very much sorry for saying those horrible
things about a lady who did not deserve it. My 'penance' is that I keep
replaying it over and over in my head and feel totally embarrassed and
guilty each time.. I deserve to feel horrible about this.
Valete,
Diana
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67548 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2009-06-20
Subject: Re: Modianus was elected Censor by the people
Cato Fabio Modiano sal.

Salve.



Do you *really* want to go down this road, Modianus?



Vale,

Cato



--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, David Kling <tau.athanasios@...> wrote:
>
> Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus Gaio Equitio Catoni salutem dicit
>
> I guess the route of contacting the Maine Attorney General and calling for
> new consules didn't work did it?
>
> Vale;
>
> Modianus
>
> On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 10:16 PM, Gaius Equitius Cato
> <catoinnyc@...>wrote:
>
> >
> > I have also been attempting, with others (including Coruncanius Cato,
> > Fabius Maximus, Flavius Aquila, Cornelius Sulla, and a couple of others), to
> > try several different approaches to making exactly the kind of Roman
> > tradition of which you speak a more viable route for our legal system.
> >
> >
> > Vale,
> >
> > Cato
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67549 From: Timothy or Stephen Gallagher Date: 2009-06-20
Subject: Coming soon to Nova Roma: A new method to get rid of ones collective
Salvete Nova Romans
 
It would seem that the only group in Nova Roma that has used the legal system to rid Nova Roma of some of their enemies are working on using a new method to rid Nova Roma of one more of their collective enemies. While I will not say who said what or where it was said or about whom it was said when that shoe drops please remember I told you so.
 
Please also remember that when they make their move it will because of something
their "enemy" said or wrote not something they DID. In other words it will be about
 
WORDS.
 
Valete
 
Tiberius Galerius Paulinus 
 
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67550 From: David Kling Date: 2009-06-20
Subject: Re: Modianus was elected Censor by the people
Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus Gaio Equitio Catoni salutem dicit

I *already* did.

Vale;

Modianus

On Sat, Jun 20, 2009 at 6:04 AM, Gaius Equitius Cato <catoinnyc@...> wrote:


Cato Fabio Modiano sal.

Salve.

Do you *really* want to go down this road, Modianus?

Vale,

Cato




Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67551 From: David Kling Date: 2009-06-20
Subject: Re: Coming soon to Nova Roma: A new method to get rid of ones collec
Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus Tiberio Galerio Paulino salutem dicit

What are you talking about?  Care to be a bit more specific?

Vale;

Modianus

On Sat, Jun 20, 2009 at 6:14 AM, Timothy or Stephen Gallagher <spqr753@...> wrote:


Salvete Nova Romans
 
It would seem that the only group in Nova Roma that has used the legal system to rid Nova Roma of some of their enemies are working on using a new method to rid Nova Roma of one more of their collective enemies. While I will not say who said what or where it was said or about whom it was said when that shoe drops please remember I told you so.
 
Please also remember that when they make their move it will because of something
their "enemy" said or wrote not something they DID. In other words it will be about
 
WORDS.
 
Valete
 
Tiberius Galerius Paulinus




Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67552 From: Publius Memmius Albucius Date: 2009-06-20
Subject: Tb Marcellus' position on the pending veto - reminder
Tribunicio Aquilae s.d.

I think that the consul is fully aware that the Hon. Tribune Marcellus' message is, at this step, the statement of a position.

In its current state, it does not fulfill the lex Didia Gemina (formal) requirements that would allowed it to be considered as a valid counter-veto of the intercession thrown by Tribune Vipsanius last Thursday 18th, and whose deadline is tomorrow, *nefastus publicus dies*, 04:29 Rome time.

Vale,


P. Memmius Albucius
praetor



--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Titus Flavius Aquila <titus.aquila@...> wrote:
>
> Salve Complutensis,amice
>
> is that statement of Marcellus enough ? Or does he have to state officially his veto on the intercessio ?
> The Sullans might claim Well it was just a statement, no official veto on the intercessio.
>
> But in general his statement is a good signal anyhow.....
>  
> Vale optime
> Titus Flavius Aquila
>  
>  
> Salvete
>
> I am forwarding this message from Tribunus Plebis C. Pompeius Marcellus with his permission.
>
> Valete
>
> M. Curiatius Complutensis
> Consul
>
> -------- Mensaje original --------
>
> ________________________________
>
> Von: M.C.C. <complutensis@...>
> An: "Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com" <Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com>
> Gesendet: Freitag, den 19. Juni 2009, 23:56:44 Uhr
> Betreff: [Fwd: Re: [Nova-Roma] Congratulations]
>
> Asunto: Re: [Nova-Roma] Congratulations
> Fecha: Fri, 19 Jun 2009 15:51:32 -0600
> De: James Hooper <warrior44_us@...>
> Para: M.C.C. <complutensis@...>
> Referencias: <h1ehke+os9h@...> <814c56690906191432l760cd762j747af5b050c9bb9c@...> <web-24378709@...> <4A3C07E2.7000500@...>
>
>
> Salve Consul,
> Please do sir.
> Vale,
> C. Pompeius Marcellus
>
>
> On Fri, 19 Jun 2009 23:49:22 +0200
> "M.C.C." <complutensis@...> wrote:
> > M. Curiatius Complutensis Consul C. Pompeio Marcello Tribuno Plebis S.P.D.
> >
> > Thanks for your reply, can I post this message in the ML?
> >
> > Cura ut valeas
> >
> > M·CVRIATIVS·COMPLVTENSIS
> > CONSVL NOVAE ROMAE
> > CONSVL HISPANIAE
> >
> > NOVA ROMA
> >
> > James Hooper escribió:
> >> Salve Consul Complutensis,
> >> In my opinion the people have spoken and these
> >> citizens should be seated. No I do not agree with the intersessio as I
> >> understand it.
> >> Vale,
> >> Gaius Pompeius Marcellus tribunis Plebis SPD
> >>
> >>
> >> On Fri, 19 Jun 2009 23:32:55 +0200
> >> M·CVR·COMPLVTENSIS <complutensis@...> wrote:
> >>> M. Curiatius Complutensis Consul C. Pompeio Marcello Tribuno Plebis
> >>> S.P.D.
> >>>
> >>> Can I understand with this your message to congratulate all the
> >>> candidates
> >>> of the recent election that you think that the elections are valid and
> >>> therefore you are against the intercessio issued by your collegae?
> >>>
> >>> Thanks in advance for your quickly reply
> >>>
> >>> Cura ut valeas
> >>>
> >>> M·CVRIATIVS·COMPLVTENSIS
> >>> CONSVL NOVAE ROMAE
> >>> CONSVL HISPANIAE
> >>>
> >>> NOVA ROMA
> >>>
> >>> -------------------------------------------
> >>>
> >>> ex paucis multa, ex minimis maxima
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> 2009/6/19 gaius_pompeius_marcellus <warrior44_us@...>
> >>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Salve,
> >>>> May I take this opportunity to congratulate all the candiddates who
> >>>> stood
> >>>> for election and won. To those who did not win, do not give up. you
> >>>> may get
> >>>> your chance to serve our beloved republic before you know it.
> >>>> Vale,
> >>>> Gaius Pompeius Marcellus
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>
> >> BB,
> >> Warrior
> >>
> >
> > --
> > M. Curiatius Complutensis
> >
> > COMMENTARIOLA HISPANIAE
> ><http://feeds2.feedburner.com/%7Er/CommentariolaHispaniae/%7E6/1>
> >
> > ? Grab this Headline Animator
> ><http://feedburner.google.com/fb/a/headlineanimator/install?id=h2caom68v18dju1ktk0gkre39o&w=1>
> >
>
> BB,
> Warrior
>
>
>
> --
> M. Curiatius Complutensis
> â†` Grab this Headline Animator
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67553 From: Timothy or Stephen Gallagher Date: 2009-06-20
Subject: Re: Coming soon to Nova Roma: A new method to get rid of ones colle
Salvete
 
I have said all I can say without breaking the seal of the list in question.
We will all know what I am talking about when the action is taken.
 
Valete
 
Tiberius Galerius Paulinus
 

To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
From: tau.athanasios@...
Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2009 06:18:02 -0400
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Coming soon to Nova Roma: A new method to get rid of ones collective enemies.



Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus Tiberio Galerio Paulino salutem dicit

What are you talking about?  Care to be a bit more specific?

Vale;

Modianus

On Sat, Jun 20, 2009 at 6:14 AM, Timothy or Stephen Gallagher <spqr753@msn. com> wrote:


Salvete Nova Romans
 
It would seem that the only group in Nova Roma that has used the legal system to rid Nova Roma of some of their enemies are working on using a new method to rid Nova Roma of one more of their collective enemies. While I will not say who said what or where it was said or about whom it was said when that shoe drops please remember I told you so.
 
Please also remember that when they make their move it will because of something
their "enemy" said or wrote not something they DID. In other words it will be about
 
WORDS.
 
Valete
 
Tiberius Galerius Paulinus





Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67554 From: David Kling Date: 2009-06-20
Subject: Re: Tb Marcellus' position on the pending veto - reminder
Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus P. Memmio Albucio salutem dicit

The tribunes vetoed my candidacy after the contio and that is not permitted per Lex Fabia de ratione comitiorum centuriatorum -- even though said tribunes ignored Lex Arminia Equitia de imperio.

Vale;

Modianus

On Sat, Jun 20, 2009 at 6:18 AM, Publius Memmius Albucius <albucius_aoe@...> wrote:


Tribunicio Aquilae s.d.

I think that the consul is fully aware that the Hon. Tribune Marcellus' message is, at this step, the statement of a position.

In its current state, it does not fulfill the lex Didia Gemina (formal) requirements that would allowed it to be considered as a valid counter-veto of the intercession thrown by Tribune Vipsanius last Thursday 18th, and whose deadline is tomorrow, *nefastus publicus dies*, 04:29 Rome time.

Vale,

P. Memmius Albucius
praetor




Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67555 From: marcushoratius Date: 2009-06-20
Subject: a. d. XII Kalendas Quinctilias: Summano in Circo Maximo
M. Moravius Piscinus cultoribus Deorum et omnibus salutem plurimam dicit: Summanus vos servent.

Hodie est ante diem XII Kalendas Quinctilias; haec dies comitialis est: Summano in Circo Maximo

O Summane, cum bene nos iuvisti,
dique alii omnes caeli potentes,
eas vobis habeo grates atque ago.

O Summanus, for your kindly aid,
and to all the divine heavenly powers,
for what we have received, I give thanks


"A shrine is said to have been dedicated to Summanus, whoever He is, when you, Pyrrhus, were a terror to the Romans." ~ Ovidius Naso, Fasti 6.731

On the Capitoline Hill stood an ancient shrine to Summanus that was said to have been dedicated by King Titus Tatius (Varro Lingua Latinae 5.74). Sometime after 278 BCE, during the war with Pyrrhus, there was a lightning storm that struck the temples of the Capitoline.

"There were many portents, and the statue of the Capitoline Jupiter was struck down by lightning. Its head was found by the seers." ~ Titus Livius, Perioche 14.2

Since we don't have the full story, as Book XIV of Livy's history in missing, it cannot be said with certainty that this incident relates to the founding of a new Temple of Saturnus near the Circus Maximus. The assumption is that it did since the Temple of Summanus was dedicated sometime between 278 and 275 BCE. However, it should be recalled that there was also a statue of Summanus on the Capitoline Hill by this time (Cicero, De Div. 1.10). If the Temple of Summanus begun in 278 BCE was related to this thunderstorm, then it is more likely that it was His statue that was struck, too, or that the statue in the Perioche refers to Jupiter Summanus. His name Summanus means "Before Morning" (from sub mane) and it refers to lightning that comes at night.

"The Tuscan books inform us, that there are nine Gods who discharge thunder-storms, that there are eleven different kinds of them, and that three of them are darted out by Jupiter. Of these the Romans retained only two, ascribing the diurnal kind to Jupiter, and the nocturnal to Summanus." ~ Plinius Secundus, Historia Naturalis 2.53

This relationship between Jupiter and Summanus is always found with the mention of the later. Summanus is a nighttime Jupiter, or so it would seem. During the imperial era there were even dedications to Jupiter Summanus. Besides Ovid's comment, quisquis is est, showing some doubt as to who Summanus may have been, this is echoed in a comment from centuries later.

"The ancient Romans paid greater honors to I know not what Summanus, to whom they attributed nocturnal thunderbolts, than to Jupiter, to whom diurnal thunderbolts were held to pertain. But, after a famous and conspicuous temple had been built to Jupiter, owing to the dignity of the building, the multitude resorted to him in so great numbers, that scarce one can be found who remembers even to have read the name of Summanus, which now he cannot once hear named." ~ Augustinus of Hippo, De Civitate Dei 4.23

And so a story emerged that Summanus struck down a statue of Jupiter in anger at the Romans paying so much attention to Jove and not enough to Summanus. But there is not an ancient source to base this on and neither whimsical I cannot quite agree with modern scholars that just because Ovid said of Summanus, "quisquis is est," that by the principate He "had been fairly shouldered out of the course by more important or pushing deities (W.W. Fowler)." Ovid has a habit of making scoffing remarks at times that I feel has more to do with playing to his audience of literati than it is a reflection of the common views of the Romans in his time. I don't think the Romans would have thought of their Gods as jostling for position and recognition. There is however also the authority of Varro, Pliny, and others we know only by quotations in other works. Varrius Flaccus, quoted by Festus, has, Quod diurna Iovis, nocturna Summani fulgura habentur. There is in Rome an inscription related to a puteal that reads, "A bolt of lightning that fell before dawn is buried here" (CIL 6.206: Fulgur summanum conditum).

Part of the Summanalia involved the use of a special bread in which was impressed a symbol of a wheel (Festus p. 348). Moulds for such breads have been discovered at Tarentum. It was observed in the late 19th century that such breads with wheels or crosses, sometimes impressed so deeply as to segment the bread, served the purpose "to facilitate distribution." Today's hot-crossed buns originate from such breads. One would have to assume therefore that the Summanalia involved sharing a meal, distributing the bread, in a manner similar to the epulum Iovis.

My own view of Summanus is that He is a God who watches over us and protects us throughout the night, employing thunderbolts against people or things that might seek to use the cover of darkness to do us harm. He is in a certain sense then a God of divine justice and of retribution, providing us security in our homes when we would be most vulnerable. Tonight as we celebrate the Summanalia we may give thanks that one may enjoy a quiet, peaceful meal in his or her home, sharing bread, because of the protection offered by Summanus.


Today's thought is from Epicurus, Golden Sayings 40.

"He who asserts that everything happens by necessity can hardly find fault with one who denies that everything happens by necessity; by his own theory this very argument is voiced by necessity."
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67556 From: Publius Ullerius Stephanus Venator Date: 2009-06-20
Subject: New Acropolis Museum
Avete;

Looks like another good reason to visit the homeland of my wife's parents.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090620/ap_on_re_eu/eu_greece_acropolis_museum

=====================================
In amicitia et fide
P Ullerius Stephanus Venator
Civis circa Quintilis MMDCCLI a.u.c.
(currently resting)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67557 From: Q. Valerius Poplicola Date: 2009-06-20
Subject: Re: Protecting Our Votes and Future Elections
Is it irony that you break the law by insulting my name (see the praetors' edict) while attempting to explain what law Sulla broke?

PS - I didn't find anything in there that he violated, why don't you spell it out?

Q. Valerius Poplicola

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "fpasquinus@..." <fpasquinus@...> wrote:
>
> What is your name?
>
> Of Course, Pepsicola...
>
> Here is my reply:
>
> Read the Lex Salicia Poenalis and you can find a non exhaustive list of the crimes of Sulla, begining for Laesa Patriae.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Q. Valerius Poplicola" <q.valerius.poplicola@> wrote:
> >
> > What rule did Sulla break? Why are you so keen on defaming him if he hasn't broken any rules?
> >
> > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "fpasquinus@" <fpasquinus@> wrote:
> > >
> > > Sulla> FOLLOW THE LAW. The Tribunes have spoken. That is that. There is no Censor other than Censor Paulinus.
> > >
> > > Yes! FOLLOW THE LAW! I am the only one who can skip the rules!
> > >
> > > (Signed Sulla)
> > >
> > > LOL
> > >
> > > I missed you Sulla, you are very funny.....
> > >
> > > People follow the law of Sulla!
> > >
> > > The people can not find his right hand with the left. The people needs Sulla.
> > >
> > > Please Sulla, take your medicines.
> > >
> > > Sulla again> There is no Censor other than Censor Paulinus.
> > >
> > > Paquinus> Sulla, with all due respect, you really need help ....professional help.
> > >
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67558 From: Q. Valerius Poplicola Date: 2009-06-20
Subject: Re: Protecting Our Votes and Future Elections
L. Iulia Aquila,

I was going to reply, in good ol' academic fashion. But on the words of Andy, I refrain. I have a quite excellent speech, if you can appreciate yourself being the target of some nasty thing. If you still want to read it, email me (you don't like to do that, it appears), and I'll send it to you.

Poplicola



--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "L Julia Aquila" <dis_pensible@...> wrote:
>
> Salvete,
>
> Oh this rich! *laugh*
> Policola does nothing for the reputation of graduate students:
>
> > > You never went to psychiatry school, did you?
>
> I am nearly speechless!
>
> Poplicola also is not a very good fisherman; fishing expeditions do not work on me;)
>
> Besides that there was no reason for Poplicola to engage me.
>
> Time to be dead serious: I just wish Poplicola would behave as someone who has earned the education he professes to. I do not know what has happened to Poplicola he does not behave or act like a man of education. I once thought he had promise. I am actually disappointed. Sad.
>
> Valete,
> Julia
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67559 From: Q. Valerius Poplicola Date: 2009-06-20
Subject: Re: Protecting Our Votes and Future Elections
It's ok, Modianus, we all know your secret. I mean, do you think that nobody knows that you were actually a close ally with Caesar, Sulla, and Fabius Maximus, but left because you wanted political power?

Even our very own Pontifex Maximus busted you out on that one. No need to ask the former "Boni" anything.

Poplicola

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, David Kling <tau.athanasios@...> wrote:
>
> Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus Q. Valerio Poplicolae salutem dicit
>
> I am unaware, young Flamen, what you mean by "two-timing" and "back stabbing
> snake." I do not have an affection for young boys, so your reference to
> "two-timing" escapes me. Additionally, where do you get this idea of
> "back-stabbing?" Have you been talking to the Boni again?
>
> Vale;
>
> Modianus
>
> On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 1:37 PM, Q. Valerius Poplicola <
> q.valerius.poplicola@...> wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > "Young flamen"
> >
> > LOL what are you my daddy? Don't you dare patronize me, you two-timing back
> > stabbing snake.
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67560 From: Q. Valerius Poplicola Date: 2009-06-20
Subject: Re: Digest Number 4586 - Some observations from the peanut gallery
Not quite, my friend.

Censor 1: Year A1, B1
Censor 2: Year B1, C1
Censor 3: Year C1, D1 = A2, B2

Because they're overlapping for two years at a time, Modianus is not eligible to run until elections are called in 2010.

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Steve Moore" <astrobear@...> wrote:
>
> Dear Andy,
>
>
>
> (I've trimmed your post, so please let me know if I mischaracterize your
> statements.)
>
>
>
> You have summed this up very clearly. The power of the Censor to add and
> remove Senators makes the office of Censor one of the most powerful in Nova
> Roma. It is in the best interest of Nova Roma to limit the term of Censor to
> safeguard the organization from a possible misuse of that power.
>
>
>
> Some people have said that Modianus is not serving consecutive terms because
> Laenas served for about four months. Others have pointed out that this leads
> to the question: "How long does Censor B have to be in office before Censor
> A can become Censor again?" There is a wide range of possible answers: one
> hour, one day, one month, four months, etc. Because this could lead to
> endless wrangling over the meaning of consecutive, the best thing to do, the
> most parsimonious, if you will, is to stick to a strict interpretation of
> the law and say:
>
>
>
> If you serve as Censor in Year A and Year B, you cannot serve in Year C, but
> you can serve in Year D and Year E.
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Steve
>
> Aka M. Valerius Potitus
>
>
>
> _____
>
> From: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com [mailto:Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf
> Of Kveldulf@...
> Sent: Friday, June 19, 2009 10:03 PM
> To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Digest Number 4586 - Some observations from the
> peanut gallery
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> The reason for limiting terms as censor is similar to limiting terms of the
> U.S. Presidency - that allowing one to hold the ofice too long allows
>
>
>
>
>
>
> one to accumulate too pmuch power (in NR, apparently by the censor being
> able to manipulate the membership of the Senate to the benefit
>
>
>
>
>
>
> of one faction or the other).
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> This is the reason why consecutive terms, rather than strict consecutive
> time periods, was intended by the law. Otherwise, a faction could
>
>
>
>
>
>
> put up a straw man for election to censor after their outgoing censor left
> office, elect the straw man, have the straw man step down,
>
>
>
>
>
>
> then run their old censor for office again and essentially use a loophole in
> the law to keep their censor in the office for close to 4 years out of
>
>
>
>
>
>
> 5 years (then at the end of the overall 5 year limit on 2 terms, have the
> guy run yet again and start the cycle over again).
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> That, as I see it, is the crux of the problem from the point of view of
> those opposed to Modianus being censor.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _____
>
> An Excellent Credit Score is 750. See
> <http://pr.atwola.com/promoclk/100126575x1222585064x1201462784/aol?redir=htt
> p://www.freecreditreport.com/pm/default.aspx?sc=668072%26hmpgID=62%26bcd=Jun
> eExcfooterNO62> Yours in Just 2 Easy Steps!
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67561 From: Gaius Vipsanius Agrippa Date: 2009-06-20
Subject: Witnessing of appointment of L. Coruncanius Cato as Aedilis Curulis
I, Gaius Vipsanius Agrippa, Lictor of Nova Roma, hereby witness the appointment of L. Coruncanius Cato as Aedilis Curulis of Nova Roma.

As a member of the Comitia Curiata I wish L. Coruncanius Cato good luck in this office and in his work for the Res Publica.

Valete
Gaius Vipsanius Agrippa
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67562 From: David Kling Date: 2009-06-20
Subject: Re: Protecting Our Votes and Future Elections
Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus Q. Valerio Poplicolae salutem dicit

Correct.  I was formerly associated with the "Boni."  But that also included such figures as Diana Octavia Aventina, Metellus, Marcus Bianchius Antonius, Palladius, Laenas, et al.  You were not around then.  You have but one side of the equation, but it is obvious which side you listen to.  I left the Boni for the same reason that Laenas left Nova Roma.  Sulla. 

Lucius Cornelius Sulla is not a good person and he is not good for Nova Roma.  It was not my intention to burn bridges with everyone else in the Boni because I felt some of them were truly good people; however, Caesar, Maximus, and Sulla (along with Drusus) were not.  So I decided to disassociate from those people. 

You claim I left them for political power.  I ran for consul in 2004, the year I left the Boni, and didn't get elected.  It took awhile to re-establish myself.  I had the trust of no one because I had been allied with them.

Your reference to the Pontifex Maximus makes no sense.  It is no secret that I was once allied to Sulla and the Boni, but that was five years ago.  Like Laenas, I saw Sulla for what he is.  Perhaps you too will have an epiphany. 

Vale;

Modianus

On Sat, Jun 20, 2009 at 8:25 AM, Q. Valerius Poplicola <q.valerius.poplicola@...> wrote:


It's ok, Modianus, we all know your secret. I mean, do you think that nobody knows that you were actually a close ally with Caesar, Sulla, and Fabius Maximus, but left because you wanted political power?

Even our very own Pontifex Maximus busted you out on that one. No need to ask the former "Boni" anything.

Poplicola


Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67563 From: Gnaeus Iulius Caesar Date: 2009-06-20
Subject: Re: Protecting Our Votes and Future Elections
Caesar Modiano SPD
 
"I felt some of them were truly good people; however, Caesar, Maximus, and Sulla (along with Drusus) were not."
 
Really? Then why did you write to me 24 hours before you announced you were leaving entreating me to join you? Did I only earn the classification of not being "good" when I refused? Remember writing that to me in your defection offer email?
 
Why did you offer to work in secret with Sulla and Drusus and the Boni generally 24 hours before you left, with your short lived group NR_Optimates, to deceive your soon to be new friends into believing you had broken all ties? Remember writing that to them?
 
You excel in re-writing past events to cast yourself in the light of this noble fellow leaving for the best of reasons, when your primary reason for leaving was because you had figured out your best chances of becoming Praetor would be served by finding new backers. Remember writing that to me in your defection offer email?
 
Try and keep the facts straight.
 
 

Sent: Saturday, June 20, 2009 6:44 AM
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: Protecting Our Votes and Future Elections

Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus Q. Valerio Poplicolae salutem dicit

Correct.  I was formerly associated with the "Boni."  But that also included such figures as Diana Octavia Aventina, Metellus, Marcus Bianchius Antonius, Palladius, Laenas, et al.  You were not around then.  You have but one side of the equation, but it is obvious which side you listen to.  I left the Boni for the same reason that Laenas left Nova Roma.  Sulla. 

Lucius Cornelius Sulla is not a good person and he is not good for Nova Roma.  It was not my intention to burn bridges with everyone else in the Boni because I felt some of them were truly good people; however, Caesar, Maximus, and Sulla (along with Drusus) were not.  So I decided to disassociate from those people. 

You claim I left them for political power.  I ran for consul in 2004, the year I left the Boni, and didn't get elected.  It took awhile to re-establish myself.  I had the trust of no one because I had been allied with
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67564 From: David Kling Date: 2009-06-20
Subject: Re: Protecting Our Votes and Future Elections
Salve:

First off, I have never run for praetor.  I ran for consul.  I likely said many things five years ago that I do not recall now.  But one thing is for certain.  Who I thought you were, is not who you are.  Why you continue to ally yourself with someone like Sulla is baffling to me.  It was baffling then, and it is baffling now.  That you continue to associate with someone like him truly attests to your character. 

It was not my intention to fully burn my bridge with the Boni because I felt there were some good people there.  I had no intention of burning my bridges with Cincinnatus, Scaurus, and others.  It was not my intention to leave in the manner in which I was forced.  People like Laenas and Diana were reasonable people -- and I wanted to continue working with them; however, I also felt there were others (who were not Boni) who were also people I wanted to work with.  When I mentioned to Sulla that we should try to work with others his response was "What's the fun in that?"  Laenas came to a similar conclusion that I had, years later.  Sulla is not good for Nova Roma.

Also, you seem to think that I was warmly welcomed by "the other side" when I left the Boni.  That is hardly the case.  I stood as a pariah for a long time before anyone would trust me again.  What I learned was being able to admit my mistakes, and endeavor to work with others.  Pompeia and I never got along.  I mended our broken relationship and established a friendship with her and we had a good consular year.  I had been enemies with Marca Hortensia Maior, bitter enemies, until I put that conflict to rest and she and I are now good friends. 

I have found, that for me, Nova Roma is less and less about "political sides" and more about friendships.  When I was in the Boni I was simply a tool to be used by the other Boni.  I was the token tribune at the time.  Nova Roma needed to be more for me than a political simulation, it had to be a community.  Once I left the Boni I eventually found a community, and have friends here that I value deeply. 

I am ashamed of my affiliation with the Boni, and having once been "allied" with Sulla.  The people I associate with now are not my "allies."  They are my friends.  These bonds of friendship have much more meaning than simple political alliances.  I'm not here to play a game.  I'm in Nova Roma to build a community.

Vale;

Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus

On Sat, Jun 20, 2009 at 8:55 AM, Gnaeus Iulius Caesar <gn_iulius_caesar@...> wrote:


Caesar Modiano SPD
 
"I felt some of them were truly good people; however, Caesar, Maximus, and Sulla (along with Drusus) were not."
 
Really? Then why did you write to me 24 hours before you announced you were leaving entreating me to join you? Did I only earn the classification of not being "good" when I refused? Remember writing that to me in your defection offer email?
 
Why did you offer to work in secret with Sulla and Drusus and the Boni generally 24 hours before you left, with your short lived group NR_Optimates, to deceive your soon to be new friends into believing you had broken all ties? Remember writing that to them?
 
You excel in re-writing past events to cast yourself in the light of this noble fellow leaving for the best of reasons, when your primary reason for leaving was because you had figured out your best chances of becoming Praetor would be served by finding new backers. Remember writing that to me in your defection offer email?
 
Try and keep the facts straight.



Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67565 From: Gnaeus Iulius Caesar Date: 2009-06-20
Subject: Re: Protecting Our Votes and Future Elections
Caesar Modiano SPD.

No you never in the end ran for Praetor, you were offered up for Consul and fell flat on your face, but when you wrote to be 24 hours before you left that was your intention. The price obviously rose from 30 silver coins to a consulship.

You stated in your post to Poplicola you left because some people weren't "good", myself included, and now after I reminded you of what you wrote, I apparently was included in that group after You can't even stick to one story for one hour. So it was baffling to you in 2004 why I associated with Sulla? So why did you offer to continue your association with Sulla and the Boni in secret? Sulla obviously wasn't so reprehensible to your delicate tastes that you were prepared to cut all ties obviously, just that you preferred no one know about it.

What is this drivel about how you were forced to leave? You wrote to me out of the blue requesting I defect. I asked you to do what you had prated on about, namely discuss with the Boni before taking precipitate action. I gave you 24 hours to post and debate. What terminated that period of silence was finding you scribbling on the NR_Optimates board you had so incompetently left open that you were just stalling me. You weren't forced to leave Modiane, and as for what followed you lost no time starting to re-establish yourself by a series of bitter posts. What was ironic about that was the majority view in the Boni after you left, Sulla's included, was to give you time and not to enter into any combative posts. That of course was before all your bile started falling out of your mouth.

Of course you wear your hair shirt of "shame", bemoaning your time in the Boni. After all they got you into the Collegium Pontificum, and there were no other goodies on offer from them, so why not leave flailing around begging forgiveness? As for your friendships only a short while ago you were declaiming there were only a couple of people in Nova Roma you regarded as friends and you were tetering on the edge of leaving.

"I likely said many things five years ago that I do not recall now."

Yes, no doubt. With that one line you dismiss all the inconsistencies and factually incorrect statements and distortions.




--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, David Kling <tau.athanasios@...> wrote:
>
> Salve:
>
> First off, I have never run for praetor. I ran for consul. I likely said
> many things five years ago that I do not recall now. But one thing is for
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67566 From: David Kling Date: 2009-06-20
Subject: Re: Protecting Our Votes and Future Elections
Salve:

I was a member of the Collegium Pontificum six months after I joined Nova Roma as Flamen Pomonalis.  That I left the Boni because of the likes of Sulla (and Drusus and Quintus Fabius Maximus) it would seem that you too are of the same ilk and therefore fall under the category of "not good."  That I thought you were a different person is beside the point.  I am better off not associating with you and those with whom you call "friends."  Feel free to have the last word.

Vale;

Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus

On Sat, Jun 20, 2009 at 9:51 AM, Gnaeus Iulius Caesar <gn_iulius_caesar@...> wrote:


Caesar Modiano SPD.

No you never in the end ran for Praetor, you were offered up for Consul and fell flat on your face, but when you wrote to be 24 hours before you left that was your intention. The price obviously rose from 30 silver coins to a consulship.

You stated in your post to Poplicola you left because some people weren't "good", myself included, and now after I reminded you of what you wrote, I apparently was included in that group after You can't even stick to one story for one hour. So it was baffling to you in 2004 why I associated with Sulla? So why did you offer to continue your association with Sulla and the Boni in secret? Sulla obviously wasn't so reprehensible to your delicate tastes that you were prepared to cut all ties obviously, just that you preferred no one know about it.

What is this drivel about how you were forced to leave? You wrote to me out of the blue requesting I defect. I asked you to do what you had prated on about, namely discuss with the Boni before taking precipitate action. I gave you 24 hours to post and debate. What terminated that period of silence was finding you scribbling on the NR_Optimates board you had so incompetently left open that you were just stalling me. You weren't forced to leave Modiane, and as for what followed you lost no time starting to re-establish yourself by a series of bitter posts. What was ironic about that was the majority view in the Boni after you left, Sulla's included, was to give you time and not to enter into any combative posts. That of course was before all your bile started falling out of your mouth.

Of course you wear your hair shirt of "shame", bemoaning your time in the Boni. After all they got you into the Collegium Pontificum, and there were no other goodies on offer from them, so why not leave flailing around begging forgiveness? As for your friendships only a short while ago you were declaiming there were only a couple of people in Nova Roma you regarded as friends and you were tetering on the edge of leaving.



"I likely said many things five years ago that I do not recall now."

Yes, no doubt. With that one line you dismiss all the inconsistencies and factually incorrect statements and distortions. 



Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67567 From: Gnaeus Iulius Caesar Date: 2009-06-20
Subject: Re: Protecting Our Votes and Future Elections
Caesar Modiano SPD
 
Have the last word? Certainly - always a pleasure with you.
 
Same "ilk"? I say again Modiane you offered a secret pact, collusion and cooperation with the Boni at the time of your leaving. That alone negates every single protestation you have made about your leaving because of Sulla, Drusus, Fabius et al. and how awful they were.
 
As for your diligent advancement in the CP who sponsored you, who backed you and who advocated for you? Cincinnatus of course always considered that you were an opportunist, and when you had the means we all know what happened to him.  
 
What you thought of me was that I would be useful to you in your defection and your quest for another pointy hat to stick on your head. When I refused and subsequently clashed with you over your failed memories of your time in the Boni, and your inept performance as consul and all that has followed since, no doubt I was added to that list of not "good" people, a list that was NEVER in existence when you left for why offer to work with the Boni in secret? Or was that a lie Modiane?
 
You will associate with anyone who you consider useful to you in your "career" in Nova Roma. That's what it takes to get on Modianus' "good" list - aid him politically. Morality has nothing to do with it as far as you are concerned, as evidenced by your secret pact offer to the Boni. Your allegiances, your friendships, everything about you in Nova Roma is a thin transparent sheet of inept guile.
 
 

Sent: Saturday, June 20, 2009 8:00 AM
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: Protecting Our Votes and Future Elections

Salve:

I was a member of the Collegium Pontificum six months after I joined Nova Roma as Flamen Pomonalis.  That I left the Boni because of the likes of Sulla (and Drusus and Quintus Fabius Maximus) it would seem that you too are of the same ilk and therefore fall under the category of "not good."  That I thought you were a different person is beside the point.  I am better off not associating with you and those with whom you call "friends."  Feel free to have the last word.

Vale;

Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus

On Sat, Jun 20, 2009 at 9:51 AM, Gnaeus Iulius Caesar <gn_iulius_caesar@...> wrote:


Caesar Modiano SPD.

No you never in the end ran for Praetor, you were offered up for Consul and fell flat on your face, but when you wrote to be 24 hours before you left that was your intention. The price obviously rose from 30 silver coins to a consulship.

You stated in your post to Poplicola you left because some people weren't "good", myself included, and now after I reminded you of what you wrote, I apparently was included in that group after You can't even stick to one story for one hour. So it was baffling to you in 2004 why I associated with Sulla? So why did you offer to continue your association with Sulla and the Boni in secret? Sulla obviously wasn't so reprehensible to your delicate tastes that you were prepared to cut all ties obviously, just that you preferred no one know about it.

What is this drivel about how you were forced to leave? You wrote to me out of the blue requesting I defect. I asked you to do what you had prated on about, namely discuss with the Boni before taking precipitate action. I gave you 24 hours to post and debate. What terminated that period of silence was finding you scribbling on the NR_Optimates board you had so incompetently left open that you were just stalling me. You weren't forced to leave Modiane, and as for what followed you lost no time starting to re-establish yourself by a series of bitter posts. What was ironic about that was the majority view in the Boni after you left, Sulla's included, was to give you time and not to enter into any combative posts. That of course was before all your bile started falling out of your mouth.

Of course you wear your hair shirt of "shame", bemoaning your time in the Boni. After all they got you into the Collegium Pontificum, and there were no other goodies on offer from them, so why not leave flailing around begging forgiveness? As for your friendships only a short while ago you were declaiming there were only a couple of people in Nova Roma you regarded as friends and you were tetering on the edge of leaving.



"I likely said many things five years ago that I do not recall now."

Yes, no doubt. With that one line you dismiss all the inconsistencies and factually incorrect statements and distortions. 



Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67568 From: Q. Valerius Poplicola Date: 2009-06-20
Subject: Re: Protecting Our Votes and Future Elections
You love playing ignorant, don't you? You've stated recently on the
Collegium Pontificum list that you wanted to be King of the Sacred Rites. Do
I need to forward your message on here? In fact, you've stated this for
years, as it was on your blog.. It's not enough that you be Pontifex and
augur, but you want to be king! It is on account of ignoble intentions that
you desire these things, and desire them all at once, and that marks you as
one who supports not the Republic, but a title-grabber, one who would rather
be Princeps Imperii then Nova Roma's humble servant.

It's simple, you show a consistent pattern of desiring power and removing
those who block you. Thus falls Cincinnatus, Cassius, Sulla, and I suspect
soon others, since I highly doubt that you or the consuls have the courage
to do the right and legal thing and either appoint a dictator to suspend the
constitution or call for new elections.

Poplicola


> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, David Kling <tau.athanasios@...> wrote:
> >
> > Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus Q. Valerio Poplicolae salutem dicit
> >
> > I was under the impression that you were an educated youth. You do know
> > that censor is a non-imperium bearing magistrate that deals mostly with
> > administrative duties right? The closest magistrates we have in Nova
> > Roma
> > to kings would be the consules (have you read Livy?). Are you
> > insinuating
> > that it is my goal to tyrannically approve citizenship appointments? Or
> > how
> > about appoint senators without a colleague (oh, wait that was done
> > already)?
> >
> > Young Flamen, you do your cause no service by participating in these
> > discussions -- perhaps you should stick to the Back Alley and give the
> > more
> > mature amongst you the opportunity to evade and deflect.
> >
> > Vale;
> >
> > Modianus
> >
> > On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 1:40 PM, Q. Valerius Poplicola <
> > q.valerius.poplicola@...> wrote:
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > Nova Roma won't be able to move on until the consuls obey the
> > > sacrosanct
> > > tribunes and call new elections.
> > >
> > > OR a dictator is appointed, and the tyrannical Modianus who desires to
> > > be
> > > King will be complete.
> > >
> > > .
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67569 From: David Kling Date: 2009-06-20
Subject: Re: Protecting Our Votes and Future Elections
Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus Q. Valerio Poplicolae salutem dicit

There is a major difference between a King (ie., Rex) and a Rex Sacrorum.  You made no distinction, and used the term King.  Have you read Roman history?  Do you know the difference between a Rex and a Rex Sacrorum?

There isn't much use in discussing anything with you.  So feel free to continue your insults, I'll simply ignore them and you.  I am growing weary in my attempt in treating you like a reasonable adult.  It seems you are incapable of your own thoughts.

Vale;

Modianus

On Sat, Jun 20, 2009 at 9:19 AM, Q. Valerius Poplicola <q.valerius.poplicola@...> wrote:


You love playing ignorant, don't you? You've stated recently on the
Collegium Pontificum list that you wanted to be King of the Sacred Rites. Do
I need to forward your message on here? In fact, you've stated this for
years, as it was on your blog.. It's not enough that you be Pontifex and
augur, but you want to be king! It is on account of ignoble intentions that
you desire these things, and desire them all at once, and that marks you as
one who supports not the Republic, but a title-grabber, one who would rather
be Princeps Imperii then Nova Roma's humble servant.

It's simple, you show a consistent pattern of desiring power and removing
those who block you. Thus falls Cincinnatus, Cassius, Sulla, and I suspect
soon others, since I highly doubt that you or the consuls have the courage
to do the right and legal thing and either appoint a dictator to suspend the
constitution or call for new elections.

Poplicola




Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67570 From: Publius Ullerius Stephanus Venator Date: 2009-06-20
Subject: Venator, future, Censorial candidacy
Avete omnes;

Just wanted an attention grabbing headline there ;-)

Just a counterpoint to a mention that I demurred due to my
"frailty"...my health is improving; both physically and mentally. The
checkup I had on my heart and pacemaker 2 weeks ago showed that the
device is firing off about 6% of the time now, as opposed to above 10%
a few weeks after implantation. I am still having some episodes of
rapid heart rate, but that too has diminished; a peak of 180 BPM this
past 6 months as opposed to 214 BPM during the prior period. As to
the lengthy bouts of 102F+ fevers and abdominal pains I had from early
February until mid May, looks like it was my body's reaction to
"stones in the water pipes."

With the betterment of the physical side of things, I find that I am
having fewer and milder bouts of the depression with which I was
diagnosed a little over 4 years ago. I have also been able to keep
from inflicting "brown bottle flu" upon myself the past year or so.

Folks, having physical or mental trouble is natural. Their affecting
your life, your energy levels, interests, reactions, actions and other
such is also natural. My doctors say that the biggest thing I have
going for me is my ability to admit that the problems exists, and
getting myself to help (albeit slowly sometimes [Abruzzese
stubbornness from my grandfather ;-]).

This little break I'm taking from anything official is a necessity. I
do skim all the posts, but only home in on some few key phrases or
words, hence, this note.

I won't be candidate for Censor, in the foreseeable future, due to
lack of knowledge, time, and desire. It is an important post, one
that calls for someone with all the above, though I think I again
cultivating the abundance of the patience and neutrality I think the
job also requires.

My thanks to those who put my name forward, even as a segment of an
arguement. I am grateful for the favorable opinion of others.

Valete - Venator the restful
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67571 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2009-06-20
Subject: Re: Protecting Our Votes and Future Elections
David Kling - everything about you speaks that you will do anything to get a pointy hat - not just in Nova Roma, but everywhere.


What I found out today....is that on top of all of this..he is a Christian Bishop.

http://lcc.cc/sophiacircle/bishops.htm


+David +David Kling Independent

tau.athanasios@...




Very interesting

We have him in a photo..dropping his pants.. http://azresident.mee.nu/warning
We have a picture of him in dreadlocks like he was a Rastafarian
Now we have him in Bishop's garb.

What else is out there under David Kling?

This guy makes NR look like a game.

This ladies and gentlemen is your Pontiff and Augur.
This ladies and gentlemen is the person who tried Lucius Equitius Cincinnatus Augur
This ladies and gentlemen is the one that brought NR to the brink of a lawsuit.
This ladies and gentlemen is what Nova Roma is reduced too.

Vale,

Sulla

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, David Kling <tau.athanasios@...> wrote:
>
> Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus Q. Valerio Poplicolae salutem dicit
>
> There is a major difference between a King (ie., Rex) and a Rex Sacrorum.
> You made no distinction, and used the term King. Have you read Roman
> history? Do you know the difference between a Rex and a Rex Sacrorum?
>
> There isn't much use in discussing anything with you. So feel free to
> continue your insults, I'll simply ignore them and you. I am growing weary
> in my attempt in treating you like a reasonable adult. It seems you are
> incapable of your own thoughts.
>
> Vale;
>
> Modianus
>
> On Sat, Jun 20, 2009 at 9:19 AM, Q. Valerius Poplicola <
> q.valerius.poplicola@...> wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > You love playing ignorant, don't you? You've stated recently on the
> > Collegium Pontificum list that you wanted to be King of the Sacred Rites.
> > Do
> > I need to forward your message on here? In fact, you've stated this for
> > years, as it was on your blog.. It's not enough that you be Pontifex and
> > augur, but you want to be king! It is on account of ignoble intentions that
> >
> > you desire these things, and desire them all at once, and that marks you as
> >
> > one who supports not the Republic, but a title-grabber, one who would
> > rather
> > be Princeps Imperii then Nova Roma's humble servant.
> >
> > It's simple, you show a consistent pattern of desiring power and removing
> > those who block you. Thus falls Cincinnatus, Cassius, Sulla, and I suspect
> > soon others, since I highly doubt that you or the consuls have the courage
> > to do the right and legal thing and either appoint a dictator to suspend
> > the
> > constitution or call for new elections.
> >
> > Poplicola
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67572 From: David Kling Date: 2009-06-20
Subject: Re: Protecting Our Votes and Future Elections
Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus Lucio Cornelio Sullae salutem dicit

My involvement in Gnosticism, Druidry, Freemasonry, Unitarian Universalism, et al., is no secret.  The Pontifex Maximus is fully aware, as are several others here in Nova Roma.  Metellus was at the same event in which I was consecrated a Gnostic bishop, as was Hadrianus (at the time a Pontifex).  What exactly is your point here?  To defame my character?  To what end?

I have had my e-mail address:  tau.athanasios @ gmail.com since 2004.  If I wanted to hide that I am also known as Tau Athanasios then I wouldn't be using that as my e-mail address would I?

I'm thinking it is time for our to grow up.

Vale;

Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus

On Sat, Jun 20, 2009 at 12:21 PM, Robert Woolwine <l_cornelius_sulla@...> wrote:


David Kling - everything about you speaks that you will do anything to get a pointy hat - not just in Nova Roma, but everywhere.

What I found out today....is that on top of all of this..he is a Christian Bishop.

http://lcc.cc/sophiacircle/bishops.htm

+David +David Kling Independent

tau.athanasios@...

Very interesting

We have him in a photo..dropping his pants.. http://azresident.mee.nu/warning
We have a picture of him in dreadlocks like he was a Rastafarian
Now we have him in Bishop's garb.

What else is out there under David Kling?

This guy makes NR look like a game.

This ladies and gentlemen is your Pontiff and Augur.
This ladies and gentlemen is the person who tried Lucius Equitius Cincinnatus Augur
This ladies and gentlemen is the one that brought NR to the brink of a lawsuit.
This ladies and gentlemen is what Nova Roma is reduced too.

Vale,

Sulla




Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67573 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2009-06-20
Subject: Re: Protecting Our Votes and Future Elections
David, is your divinity school aware of all of your involvements as well?


--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, David Kling <tau.athanasios@...> wrote:
>
> Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus Lucio Cornelio Sullae salutem dicit
>
> My involvement in Gnosticism, Druidry, Freemasonry, Unitarian Universalism,
> et al., is no secret. The Pontifex Maximus is fully aware, as are several
> others here in Nova Roma. Metellus was at the same event in which I was
> consecrated a Gnostic bishop, as was Hadrianus (at the time a Pontifex).
> What exactly is your point here? To defame my character? To what end?
>
> I have had my e-mail address: tau.athanasios @ gmail.com since 2004. If I
> wanted to hide that I am also known as Tau Athanasios then I wouldn't be
> using that as my e-mail address would I?
>
> I'm thinking it is time for our to grow up.
>
> Vale;
>
> Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus
>
> On Sat, Jun 20, 2009 at 12:21 PM, Robert Woolwine <
> l_cornelius_sulla@...> wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > David Kling - everything about you speaks that you will do anything to get
> > a pointy hat - not just in Nova Roma, but everywhere.
> >
> > What I found out today....is that on top of all of this..he is a Christian
> > Bishop.
> >
> > http://lcc.cc/sophiacircle/bishops.htm
> >
> > +David +David Kling Independent
> >
> > tau.athanasios@... <tau.athanasios%40gmail.com>
> >
> > Very interesting
> >
> > We have him in a photo..dropping his pants..
> > http://azresident.mee.nu/warning
> > We have a picture of him in dreadlocks like he was a Rastafarian
> > Now we have him in Bishop's garb.
> >
> > What else is out there under David Kling?
> >
> > This guy makes NR look like a game.
> >
> > This ladies and gentlemen is your Pontiff and Augur.
> > This ladies and gentlemen is the person who tried Lucius Equitius
> > Cincinnatus Augur
> > This ladies and gentlemen is the one that brought NR to the brink of a
> > lawsuit.
> > This ladies and gentlemen is what Nova Roma is reduced too.
> >
> > Vale,
> >
> > Sulla
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67574 From: David Kling Date: 2009-06-20
Subject: Re: Protecting Our Votes and Future Elections
Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus S.P.D.

As you will notice, citizens of Nova Roma, that senator Lucius Cornelius Sulla continues to refer to me by my birth name even after I respectfully advised him of my wishes to use my Roman name.  The Back Alley faction now seem intent on attacking my reputation and so forth in an attempt to drive me from Nova Roma. 

Valete:

Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus

On Sat, Jun 20, 2009 at 12:42 PM, Robert Woolwine <l_cornelius_sulla@...> wrote:


David, is your divinity school aware of all of your involvements as well?




Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67575 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2009-06-20
Subject: Re: Protecting Our Votes and Future Elections
I disregard your request. In my opinion, you are not worthy of having a Roman name - GIVEN your reputation and more importantly actions. So, from here on in. It is David.

Vale,

Sulla

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, David Kling <tau.athanasios@...> wrote:
>
> Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus S.P.D.
>
> As you will notice, citizens of Nova Roma, that senator Lucius Cornelius
> Sulla continues to refer to me by my birth name even after I respectfully
> advised him of my wishes to use my Roman name. The Back Alley faction now
> seem intent on attacking my reputation and so forth in an attempt to drive
> me from Nova Roma.
>
> Valete:
>
> Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus
>
> On Sat, Jun 20, 2009 at 12:42 PM, Robert Woolwine <
> l_cornelius_sulla@...> wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > David, is your divinity school aware of all of your involvements as well?
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67576 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2009-06-20
Subject: Re: Protecting Our Votes and Future Elections
Play the victim, David. You do it so well. And, it does not fool any of us, citizen David.


--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, David Kling <tau.athanasios@...> wrote:
>
> Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus S.P.D.
>
> As you will notice, citizens of Nova Roma, that senator Lucius Cornelius
> Sulla continues to refer to me by my birth name even after I respectfully
> advised him of my wishes to use my Roman name. The Back Alley faction now
> seem intent on attacking my reputation and so forth in an attempt to drive
> me from Nova Roma.
>
> Valete:
>
> Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus
>
> On Sat, Jun 20, 2009 at 12:42 PM, Robert Woolwine <
> l_cornelius_sulla@...> wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > David, is your divinity school aware of all of your involvements as well?
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67577 From: C. Maria Caeca Date: 2009-06-20
Subject: Re: Venator, future, Censorial candidacy
Salve Venator,

Whatever your plans, it gladdens me considerably to learn that your health
and well being are improving! That, for me, is elegant sufficiency!

C. Maria Caeca
----- Original Message -----
From: "Publius Ullerius Stephanus Venator" <famila.ulleria.venii@...>
To: "NR-Main List" <Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Saturday, June 20, 2009 12:04 PM
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Venator, future, Censorial candidacy


> Avete omnes;
>
> Just wanted an attention grabbing headline there ;-)
>
> Just a counterpoint to a mention that I demurred due to my
> "frailty"...my health is improving; both physically and mentally. The
> checkup I had on my heart and pacemaker 2 weeks ago showed that the
> device is firing off about 6% of the time now, as opposed to above 10%
> a few weeks after implantation. I am still having some episodes of
> rapid heart rate, but that too has diminished; a peak of 180 BPM this
> past 6 months as opposed to 214 BPM during the prior period. As to
> the lengthy bouts of 102F+ fevers and abdominal pains I had from early
> February until mid May, looks like it was my body's reaction to
> "stones in the water pipes."
>
> With the betterment of the physical side of things, I find that I am
> having fewer and milder bouts of the depression with which I was
> diagnosed a little over 4 years ago. I have also been able to keep
> from inflicting "brown bottle flu" upon myself the past year or so.
>
> Folks, having physical or mental trouble is natural. Their affecting
> your life, your energy levels, interests, reactions, actions and other
> such is also natural. My doctors say that the biggest thing I have
> going for me is my ability to admit that the problems exists, and
> getting myself to help (albeit slowly sometimes [Abruzzese
> stubbornness from my grandfather ;-]).
>
> This little break I'm taking from anything official is a necessity. I
> do skim all the posts, but only home in on some few key phrases or
> words, hence, this note.
>
> I won't be candidate for Censor, in the foreseeable future, due to
> lack of knowledge, time, and desire. It is an important post, one
> that calls for someone with all the above, though I think I again
> cultivating the abundance of the patience and neutrality I think the
> job also requires.
>
> My thanks to those who put my name forward, even as a segment of an
> arguement. I am grateful for the favorable opinion of others.
>
> Valete - Venator the restful
>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 8.5.339 / Virus Database: 270.12.81/2189 - Release Date: 06/20/09
06:15:00
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67578 From: Gnaeus Iulius Caesar Date: 2009-06-20
Subject: Re: Protecting Our Votes and Future Elections
Caesar Modiano SPD
 
"The Back Alley faction now seem intent on attacking my reputation and so forth in an attempt to drive me from Nova Roma."
 
A pathetic plea for a rush of supportive posts no doubt. Stay or go from Nova Roma, elevate yourself to rex - your choice and yours alone and frankly I consider your fate inconsequential, but if you mention my name with some blatant public distortion of your departure from the Boni and your reasons for leaving, then expect to be challenged and called on it - every time. If you flout the law and twist it to gain another pointy hat then expect to be challenged and called on it - every time.
 
I note you studiously avoided denying my account of your departure, your reasons, your actions, the offer of your grubby little secret pact, which was sensible. Unlike you my memory remains intact as does my email storage and screen shot folder.
 
 

Sent: Saturday, June 20, 2009 10:48 AM
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: Protecting Our Votes and Future Elections

Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus S.P.D.

As you will notice, citizens of Nova Roma, that senator Lucius Cornelius Sulla continues to refer to me by my birth name even after I respectfully advised him of my wishes to use my Roman name.  The Back Alley faction now seem intent on attacking my reputation and so forth in an attempt to drive me from Nova Roma. 

Valete:

Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus

On Sat, Jun 20, 2009 at 12:42 PM, Robert Woolwine <l_cornelius_sulla@...> wrote:
 
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67579 From: Timothy or Stephen Gallagher Date: 2009-06-20
Subject: Re: Venator, future, Censorial candidacy
Salve Venator
 
I am also glad that your health has improved and I will pray that it continues to do so.
Please enjoy your rest. 
 
Vale
 
Paulinus
 

To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
From: shoshanahathaway@...
Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2009 13:13:48 -0400
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Venator, future, Censorial candidacy



Salve Venator,

Whatever your plans, it gladdens me considerably to learn that your health
and well being are improving! That, for me, is elegant sufficiency!

C. Maria Caeca
----- Original Message -----
From: "Publius Ullerius Stephanus Venator" <famila.ulleria. venii@gmail. com>
To: "NR-Main List" <Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com>
Sent: Saturday, June 20, 2009 12:04 PM
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Venator, future, Censorial candidacy

> Avete omnes;
>
> Just wanted an attention grabbing headline there ;-)
>
> Just a counterpoint to a mention that I demurred due to my
> "frailty"... my health is improving; both physically and mentally. The
> checkup I had on my heart and pacemaker 2 weeks ago showed that the
> device is firing off about 6% of the time now, as opposed to above 10%
> a few weeks after implantation. I am still having some episodes of
> rapid heart rate, but that too has diminished; a peak of 180 BPM this
> past 6 months as opposed to 214 BPM during the prior period. As to
> the lengthy bouts of 102F+ fevers and abdominal pains I had from early
> February until mid May, looks like it was my body's reaction to
> "stones in the water pipes."
>
> With the betterment of the physical side of things, I find that I am
> having fewer and milder bouts of the depression with which I was
> diagnosed a little over 4 years ago. I have also been able to keep
> from inflicting "brown bottle flu" upon myself the past year or so.
>
> Folks, having physical or mental trouble is natural. Their affecting
> your life, your energy levels, interests, reactions, actions and other
> such is also natural. My doctors say that the biggest thing I have
> going for me is my ability to admit that the problems exists, and
> getting myself to help (albeit slowly sometimes [Abruzzese
> stubbornness from my grandfather ;-]).
>
> This little break I'm taking from anything official is a necessity. I
> do skim all the posts, but only home in on some few key phrases or
> words, hence, this note.
>
> I won't be candidate for Censor, in the foreseeable future, due to
> lack of knowledge, time, and desire. It is an important post, one
> that calls for someone with all the above, though I think I again
> cultivating the abundance of the patience and neutrality I think the
> job also requires.
>
> My thanks to those who put my name forward, even as a segment of an
> arguement. I am grateful for the favorable opinion of others.
>
> Valete - Venator the restful
>
>
> ------------ --------- --------- ------
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>

------------ --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- -

No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 8.5.339 / Virus Database: 270.12.81/2189 - Release Date: 06/20/09
06:15:00


Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67580 From: Maior Date: 2009-06-20
Subject: Re: Regrets
--Salve Diana Octavia;
some see Nova Roma as an online rpg so it seems unreal. But yes there is a Virgo Maxima and saying rude things about her does hurt her feelings.
That you apologized and acknowled such, says a great deal about your character. I'm glad to see it and I hope you will pick up your citizenship again. Those who see Nova Roma as a real life institution, find it nourishing with wonderful friendships.

I've gotten a great deal from Nova Roma, more than I have given. Just ignore politics and concentrate on meeting Nova Romans where you live. I think you will find it a better place and full of wonderful people.
bene vale in pacem deorum
M. Hortensia Maior
>
> Salvete all (and especially our Vestal virgin),
>
> You know, I've said a lot of rude things to people over the years, and there
> is only one thing that keeps replaying over and over in my mind that I
> really really regret- and those were the horribly rude comments that I made
> about our Vestal virgin in the BA. I won't repeat them, because I cringe
> everytime I think of them. Someone hit the nail on the head when they said
> that I made those comments just as I would have made a comment about a
> catholic priest. I didn't think of a person as a Vestal virgin. I just
> spontaneously and stupidly wrote 2 nasty things in a row. Then once I saw
> that our Vestal virgin was upset, it hit me that I was actually commented
> rudely about a real flesh and blood woman whom I always liked and who was
> always very sweet to me.. Then the reality set in and I thought "What kind
> of diarhea has been flowing out of my mouth for the last few years?". I
> would never ever say anything so hurtful in real life to anyone. In fact, I
> always go out of my way to say nice things to people....
>
> So once again I am extremely & very much sorry for saying those horrible
> things about a lady who did not deserve it. My 'penance' is that I keep
> replaying it over and over in my head and feel totally embarrassed and
> guilty each time.. I deserve to feel horrible about this.
> Valete,
> Diana
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67581 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2009-06-20
Subject: Re: Protecting Our Votes and Future Elections
Cato Cornelio Sullae salutem dicit.

Salve.

Sulla, I earnestly ask that no matter what faults or grievances anyone might have with each other within our Respublica that we honor our Roman names. Even Maior, with whom I have a less-than-amicable realtionship, and I have never resorted to using each others extra-Nova Roman names.

It is beneath our collective dignities to do so, and as a fellow senator I ask that you cease.

Vale,

Cato

P.S. - just to be clear, your criticism on one level is incorrect: Modianus is *not* a "Christian" bishop. He is a gnostic, a sect anathemetized by the Church and rejected as heresy. It is not Christianity. GEC




--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Robert Woolwine" <l_cornelius_sulla@...> wrote:
>
> I disregard your request. In my opinion, you are not worthy of having a Roman name - GIVEN your reputation and more importantly actions. So, from here on in. It is David.
>
> Vale,
>
> Sulla
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, David Kling <tau.athanasios@> wrote:
> >
> > Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus S.P.D.
> >
> > As you will notice, citizens of Nova Roma, that senator Lucius Cornelius
> > Sulla continues to refer to me by my birth name even after I respectfully
> > advised him of my wishes to use my Roman name. The Back Alley faction now
> > seem intent on attacking my reputation and so forth in an attempt to drive
> > me from Nova Roma.
> >
> > Valete:
> >
> > Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus
> >
> > On Sat, Jun 20, 2009 at 12:42 PM, Robert Woolwine <
> > l_cornelius_sulla@> wrote:
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > David, is your divinity school aware of all of your involvements as well?
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67582 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2009-06-20
Subject: Re: Venator, future, Censorial candidacy
Cato Ullerio Venatori sal.

salve!

Excellent news and I hope that you gain strength and wisdom every day that passes :)

You would make a good censor, though.

Vale!

Cato
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67583 From: David Kling Date: 2009-06-20
Subject: Re: Protecting Our Votes and Future Elections
Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus Gaio Equitio Catoni salutem dicit

"Modianus is *not* a "Christian" bishop. He is a gnostic, a sect anathemetized by the Church and rejected as heresy."

Gee Cato... you could at least capitalize Gnostic! 

Vale;

Modianus

On Sat, Jun 20, 2009 at 1:35 PM, Gaius Equitius Cato <catoinnyc@...> wrote:


Cato Cornelio Sullae salutem dicit.

Salve.

Sulla, I earnestly ask that no matter what faults or grievances anyone might have with each other within our Respublica that we honor our Roman names. Even Maior, with whom I have a less-than-amicable realtionship, and I have never resorted to using each others extra-Nova Roman names.

It is beneath our collective dignities to do so, and as a fellow senator I ask that you cease.

Vale,

Cato

P.S. - just to be clear, your criticism on one level is incorrect: Modianus is *not* a "Christian" bishop. He is a gnostic, a sect anathemetized by the Church and rejected as heresy. It is not Christianity. GEC




Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67584 From: C. Maria Caeca Date: 2009-06-20
Subject: Re: Some questions now that I have peace of mind...
Salve,

These are wonderful pictures, but I trust that there will be more
informative labels with them, other than image numbers, yes? It would be
really grand to know who, exactly, I am trying to look at ... faces to
names, and all that (smile).

C. Maria Caeca, very happy to see pictures of this event under any
circumstances!
----- Original Message -----
From: "livia_plauta" <livia.plauta@...>
To: <Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Friday, June 19, 2009 3:42 PM
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Some questions now that I have peace of mind...


> L. Livia Plauta N. Apollonio Quadrato S.P.D.
>
> Apolloni, don't worry about your tribe and century. Since tese parameters
> only have significance during an election, you will be assigned a tribe
> and century just before the next election. Of course, if you don't pay
> taxes and stay capite census, you will be in century 51 together with all
> the other capite censi, and your vote will count next to nothing.
>
> As for NR coins, there was a project to issue some new ones, but I don't
> know what its status is now. I've been thinking of inquiring in Budapest
> (where I live). Apparently the Hungarian National Bank can mint any coins
> by request. It's a good idea to make silver coins: they certainly look
> better than brass, and as you say, they have an intrinsic value.
>
> I think in our future coin minting we should follow more closely the size
> and appearance of roman coins.
>
> Anyway what is silver clay? I have never heard about this. is it only
> available in the US?
>
> As for the toga and tunica, actually for a free citizen it's kind of
> inconvenient to wear a tunica only. You'd look like a slave. If you don't
> want to make a toga (it takes 10 metres of fabric), you can always wear a
> pallium, which is much easier to make and drape. All it takes is 4,5 - 5
> metres of 150 cm wide fabric, and you don't have to do anything with it,
> though it's a good idea to sow small lead weights at the four corners (it
> will make it much easier to wear).
>
> In the http://www.novaroma.org/nr/Category:XX_Floralia_Aquinci page (even
> if it's still under construction) you can see A. Apollonius Cordus
> sporting a purple pallium (in CIMG8874 230726.jpg, for example). You can
> also see what tunicae and togae look like.
>
> On another topic, I'm more and more impressed by your analysis of the
> situation with Modianus' election. In a few days you have been able to
> research all the laws concerned, and expose the situation much better than
> any of us had managed before.
>
> Optime vale,
> Livia
>
>
>>
>> N. Apollonius Quadratus L. Julia Aquila salutem plurimam dicit.
>>
>> Thank you, it does help. As for silver, as long as Nova Roma is doing
>> something to secure actual physical wealth and not fiat money.
>>
>> Regarding land, there are many ways to acquire land cheaply. I'm just
>> wondering what Nova Roma is doing. I did take a gander over at the
>> proposed budget, but I am just wondering exactly what the effort is for.
>> There is some money put aside, but what exactly will it be used for? Is
>> it going to be a down payment? Is Nova Roma utilizing Tax Exempt status?
>> What is Nova Roma's plan for expansion?
>>
>> As for Toga or Tunic, I just don't have the time to make a full on
>> exciting toga of wonder. Two squares sewn together, I can live with
>> that. I am not the most artistically inclined.
>>
>> As for probation, well my probation is actually over. I successfully
>> completed the test and passed my probationary period. So I'm not sure
>> what to do now. Maybe I will be adopted by a Plebian family. Oh a
>> humble Plebian such as I can only dream of being adopted into a Plebian
>> family...wait a minute...
>>
>> Vale
>>
>> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "L Julia Aquila" <dis_pensible@> wrote:
>> >
>> > Salve Quadratus,
>> >
>> > Oh I like working with silver clay, it does really well esp in
>> > sculptures. You're right though it is expensive.. However from what I
>> > understand the manufacture of the coins is such that real silver (gold
>> > or copper) would be used.
>> > If you don't have the links to the current issue here they are:
>> > http://novaroma.org/nr/Sestertius_signum
>> > http://www.novaroma.org/wiki/Coin_(Nova_Roma)
>> >
>> > They are still available and can be bought from Agrippa here(which also
>> > explains the process by which they are made):
>> > http://harpax.biz/coins.html
>> >
>> > The NR chat is not an official Nova Roma chat - it is essentially
>> > peopled by back alley folks although that statement will probably make
>> > this thread grow;)
>> >
>> > So you are not missing anything in my opinion. However I know some of
>> > the Nova Roma folks use Yahoo Im, and I think gmail's also.'
>> > About the land, all I can do is smile. A lot of people have a lot of
>> > ideas - hopefully one will take hold. We need to fundraise and invest
>> > the money, esp. here in the states. We also need much more planning and
>> > people committed to it for the long haul.
>> >
>> > It is ok to have a tunic and not a toga. Livia made a really nice one
>> > for Petronius Dexter - If you are on facebook you can add the lot of us
>> > and connect that way also.
>> >
>> > Here is a link on the proper way to address member of the Senate and
>> > Magistrates or citizen, generally a distinction is not made in the
>> > forum: http://www.novaroma.org/nr/Using_Roman_names
>> >
>> > I think, but I am not certain, that you will be assigned a tribe after
>> > your 90 day probation period.
>> >
>> > Hope this helps, and feel free to enquire further~
>> >
>> > Vale,
>> > Julia
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "n_apollonius_quadratus"
>> > <n_apollonius_quadratus@> wrote:
>> > >
>> > > Omnibus Salvete
>> > >
>> > > I've been trying to get into Nova Roma IRC for sometime now, and I am
>> > > using Firefox 3, and I am using chatzilla? It's the IRC plug in for
>> > > Firefox. Every time I try to connect, it says either refused or
>> > > timed out. Now I changed my name over to N_Apollonius_Quadratus, so
>> > > that shouldn't be an issue. I turned on and off my fire wall to see
>> > > if that was an issue, and it wasn't. Is there something I'm missing?
>> > >
>> > > Also, what does it cost the government to print the Nova Roma coins?
>> > > I like that there is coinage being produced, but they are brass.
>> > > Nothing wrong with brass, but let's give Nova Roma a little kick in
>> > > the tail. Now if Nova Roma doesn't have Tax Exempt status it sure
>> > > needs to get it fast. That way authorized members of Nova Roma can
>> > > go out and purchase PMC (precious metal clay). This clay is .999
>> > > pure silver. Well if you get the silver. The gold is a little hefty
>> > > and getting copper isn't a bad idea. Since the authorized individual
>> > > purchased the clay for Nova Roma, then Nova Roma owns that clay.
>> > > This is a tax write off and will be refunded at the next tax returns.
>> > > The silver is classified as basic operating expenses as the silver
>> > > will be minted in Nova Roma fashion. Now Nova Roma has some serious
>> > > pulling weight. Real silver coins to give buying power to the Ordo
>> > > Equestor, and the Copper coinage would also bring more buying power.
>> > > Now instead of blank fiat money polluting Nova Roma, we have actual
>> > > real wealth on which to pull from. Not only that, but should the
>> > > silver market rise, so too will Nova Roma's wealth. If every citizen
>> > > of Nova Roma purchased one box of PMC and donated it to Nova Roma,
>> > > and Nova Roma purchased some PMC for itself, then Nova Roma will
>> > > begin to have some serious wealth being developed that will not
>> > > depreciate. The people who donated the PMC will be able to declare
>> > > the silver as a donation and be refunded for the cost of the PMC.
>> > > Realistically the cost of PMC is higher than the cost of silver as it
>> > > stands, but the cost isn't a factor as the expense is refunded since
>> > > it was a donation.
>> > >
>> > > What is Nova Roma doing about expansion? If Nova Roma is not a tax
>> > > exempt organization it needs to be quickly. As such puting down
>> > > payments on land would place Nova Roma as the sole owner of that
>> > > land, and there would be no land tax and the cost of purchasing that
>> > > land would be refunded. On top of that, Nova Roma can take care of
>> > > other costs by building on the land making it a sort of vacation spot
>> > > for people to live an "authentic" Roman lifestyle. There are all
>> > > sorts of quirky places like that riddling the US and other places as
>> > > well. In Finland there was an Inn for some time that you could live
>> > > as a Viking. I mean Santa Claus is in Finland for goodness sake. If
>> > > we used the ram earth technique to build the houses and other such
>> > > buildings, we can save on costs for construction. We would also be
>> > > minimally impacting the environment. If a garden for farming was
>> > > established then the land could become autonomous and eventually turn
>> > > into a commune where Nova Roman citizens could actually live in the
>> > > lifestyle they desired. As a Temple to the Roman Gods became
>> > > established on the land more people would flock to it for it's Pagan
>> > > connotations. Nova Roma would expand, gaining more wealth for
>> > > itself, it would spread the word of Nova Roma as people go there to
>> > > escape mundane life and explore a more "holistic" way of life, in
>> > > turn this money collected from travelers would go into the Nova Roman
>> > > pockets where partial investment in precious metals like silver and
>> > > gold solidify the wealth of Nova Roma. As the construction of the
>> > > Temple becomes complete the transition from tourist destination
>> > > begins to change into a commune that is self sufficient and capable
>> > > of housing Nova Roman citizens. This all while Nova Roma purchases
>> > > new land to continue the cycle of tourist then commune. Has this
>> > > ever been considered by Nova Roman officials? What steps are there
>> > > to further the goal of physical manifestation of our place in this
>> > > world? Meetings are fine and all, but a central hub where Nova
>> > > Romans can gather and LIVE in the lifestyle we choose, what is being
>> > > to done to carry this out?
>> > >
>> > > Also, is there going to be a meet up in the US or isn't there? I've
>> > > been trying to pay attention.
>> > >
>> > > And is it okay to have a tunic but not a toga?
>> > >
>> > > What is the proper way to address members of the Senate and other
>> > > such Magistrates?
>> > >
>> > > And how come I haven't been assigned to my tribe yet?
>> > >
>> > > These and other questions should probably stay in my head. Until
>> > > next time...
>> > >
>> > > Valete.
>> > >
>> >
>>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 8.5.339 / Virus Database: 270.12.80/2187 - Release Date: 06/19/09
06:53:00
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67585 From: Maior Date: 2009-06-20
Subject: Re: Roman Clothing [was ; Some questions now that I have peace o
> Salvete Livia omnesque;
those are fabulous pictures and Lentulus is indeed the rex of the elegantly draped toga!
Cordus looked wonderful in a pallium too, it's quite interesting to me, that when you put on roman clothing, you start assuming, the gestures, hand positions of the statues. That was fascinating for me.
The women look a bit less finished, lumpy - I would say. For their pallas they need stiffer fabrics, so it doesn't collapse on top of their heads. I have a palla in duppioni silk and the stiff folds hold up really well for draping and over my hair.
bene vale
Maior



>
> These are wonderful pictures, but I trust that there will be more
> informative labels with them, other than image numbers, yes? It would be
> really grand to know who, exactly, I am trying to look at ... faces to
> names, and all that (smile).
>
> C. Maria Caeca, very happy to see pictures of this event under any
> circumstances!
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "livia_plauta" <livia.plauta@...>
> To: <Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com>
> Sent: Friday, June 19, 2009 3:42 PM
> Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Some questions now that I have peace of mind...
>
>
> > L. Livia Plauta N. Apollonio Quadrato S.P.D.
> >
> > Apolloni, don't worry about your tribe and century. Since tese parameters
> > only have significance during an election, you will be assigned a tribe
> > and century just before the next election. Of course, if you don't pay
> > taxes and stay capite census, you will be in century 51 together with all
> > the other capite censi, and your vote will count next to nothing.
> >
> > As for NR coins, there was a project to issue some new ones, but I don't
> > know what its status is now. I've been thinking of inquiring in Budapest
> > (where I live). Apparently the Hungarian National Bank can mint any coins
> > by request. It's a good idea to make silver coins: they certainly look
> > better than brass, and as you say, they have an intrinsic value.
> >
> > I think in our future coin minting we should follow more closely the size
> > and appearance of roman coins.
> >
> > Anyway what is silver clay? I have never heard about this. is it only
> > available in the US?
> >
> > As for the toga and tunica, actually for a free citizen it's kind of
> > inconvenient to wear a tunica only. You'd look like a slave. If you don't
> > want to make a toga (it takes 10 metres of fabric), you can always wear a
> > pallium, which is much easier to make and drape. All it takes is 4,5 - 5
> > metres of 150 cm wide fabric, and you don't have to do anything with it,
> > though it's a good idea to sow small lead weights at the four corners (it
> > will make it much easier to wear).
> >
> > In the http://www.novaroma.org/nr/Category:XX_Floralia_Aquinci page (even
> > if it's still under construction) you can see A. Apollonius Cordus
> > sporting a purple pallium (in CIMG8874 230726.jpg, for example). You can
> > also see what tunicae and togae look like.
> >
> > On another topic, I'm more and more impressed by your analysis of the
> > situation with Modianus' election. In a few days you have been able to
> > research all the laws concerned, and expose the situation much better than
> > any of us had managed before.
> >
> > Optime vale,
> > Livia
> >
> >
> >>
> >> N. Apollonius Quadratus L. Julia Aquila salutem plurimam dicit.
> >>
> >> Thank you, it does help. As for silver, as long as Nova Roma is doing
> >> something to secure actual physical wealth and not fiat money.
> >>
> >> Regarding land, there are many ways to acquire land cheaply. I'm just
> >> wondering what Nova Roma is doing. I did take a gander over at the
> >> proposed budget, but I am just wondering exactly what the effort is for.
> >> There is some money put aside, but what exactly will it be used for? Is
> >> it going to be a down payment? Is Nova Roma utilizing Tax Exempt status?
> >> What is Nova Roma's plan for expansion?
> >>
> >> As for Toga or Tunic, I just don't have the time to make a full on
> >> exciting toga of wonder. Two squares sewn together, I can live with
> >> that. I am not the most artistically inclined.
> >>
> >> As for probation, well my probation is actually over. I successfully
> >> completed the test and passed my probationary period. So I'm not sure
> >> what to do now. Maybe I will be adopted by a Plebian family. Oh a
> >> humble Plebian such as I can only dream of being adopted into a Plebian
> >> family...wait a minute...
> >>
> >> Vale
> >>
> >> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "L Julia Aquila" <dis_pensible@> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > Salve Quadratus,
> >> >
> >> > Oh I like working with silver clay, it does really well esp in
> >> > sculptures. You're right though it is expensive.. However from what I
> >> > understand the manufacture of the coins is such that real silver (gold
> >> > or copper) would be used.
> >> > If you don't have the links to the current issue here they are:
> >> > http://novaroma.org/nr/Sestertius_signum
> >> > http://www.novaroma.org/wiki/Coin_(Nova_Roma)
> >> >
> >> > They are still available and can be bought from Agrippa here(which also
> >> > explains the process by which they are made):
> >> > http://harpax.biz/coins.html
> >> >
> >> > The NR chat is not an official Nova Roma chat - it is essentially
> >> > peopled by back alley folks although that statement will probably make
> >> > this thread grow;)
> >> >
> >> > So you are not missing anything in my opinion. However I know some of
> >> > the Nova Roma folks use Yahoo Im, and I think gmail's also.'
> >> > About the land, all I can do is smile. A lot of people have a lot of
> >> > ideas - hopefully one will take hold. We need to fundraise and invest
> >> > the money, esp. here in the states. We also need much more planning and
> >> > people committed to it for the long haul.
> >> >
> >> > It is ok to have a tunic and not a toga. Livia made a really nice one
> >> > for Petronius Dexter - If you are on facebook you can add the lot of us
> >> > and connect that way also.
> >> >
> >> > Here is a link on the proper way to address member of the Senate and
> >> > Magistrates or citizen, generally a distinction is not made in the
> >> > forum: http://www.novaroma.org/nr/Using_Roman_names
> >> >
> >> > I think, but I am not certain, that you will be assigned a tribe after
> >> > your 90 day probation period.
> >> >
> >> > Hope this helps, and feel free to enquire further~
> >> >
> >> > Vale,
> >> > Julia
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "n_apollonius_quadratus"
> >> > <n_apollonius_quadratus@> wrote:
> >> > >
> >> > > Omnibus Salvete
> >> > >
> >> > > I've been trying to get into Nova Roma IRC for sometime now, and I am
> >> > > using Firefox 3, and I am using chatzilla? It's the IRC plug in for
> >> > > Firefox. Every time I try to connect, it says either refused or
> >> > > timed out. Now I changed my name over to N_Apollonius_Quadratus, so
> >> > > that shouldn't be an issue. I turned on and off my fire wall to see
> >> > > if that was an issue, and it wasn't. Is there something I'm missing?
> >> > >
> >> > > Also, what does it cost the government to print the Nova Roma coins?
> >> > > I like that there is coinage being produced, but they are brass.
> >> > > Nothing wrong with brass, but let's give Nova Roma a little kick in
> >> > > the tail. Now if Nova Roma doesn't have Tax Exempt status it sure
> >> > > needs to get it fast. That way authorized members of Nova Roma can
> >> > > go out and purchase PMC (precious metal clay). This clay is .999
> >> > > pure silver. Well if you get the silver. The gold is a little hefty
> >> > > and getting copper isn't a bad idea. Since the authorized individual
> >> > > purchased the clay for Nova Roma, then Nova Roma owns that clay.
> >> > > This is a tax write off and will be refunded at the next tax returns.
> >> > > The silver is classified as basic operating expenses as the silver
> >> > > will be minted in Nova Roma fashion. Now Nova Roma has some serious
> >> > > pulling weight. Real silver coins to give buying power to the Ordo
> >> > > Equestor, and the Copper coinage would also bring more buying power.
> >> > > Now instead of blank fiat money polluting Nova Roma, we have actual
> >> > > real wealth on which to pull from. Not only that, but should the
> >> > > silver market rise, so too will Nova Roma's wealth. If every citizen
> >> > > of Nova Roma purchased one box of PMC and donated it to Nova Roma,
> >> > > and Nova Roma purchased some PMC for itself, then Nova Roma will
> >> > > begin to have some serious wealth being developed that will not
> >> > > depreciate. The people who donated the PMC will be able to declare
> >> > > the silver as a donation and be refunded for the cost of the PMC.
> >> > > Realistically the cost of PMC is higher than the cost of silver as it
> >> > > stands, but the cost isn't a factor as the expense is refunded since
> >> > > it was a donation.
> >> > >
> >> > > What is Nova Roma doing about expansion? If Nova Roma is not a tax
> >> > > exempt organization it needs to be quickly. As such puting down
> >> > > payments on land would place Nova Roma as the sole owner of that
> >> > > land, and there would be no land tax and the cost of purchasing that
> >> > > land would be refunded. On top of that, Nova Roma can take care of
> >> > > other costs by building on the land making it a sort of vacation spot
> >> > > for people to live an "authentic" Roman lifestyle. There are all
> >> > > sorts of quirky places like that riddling the US and other places as
> >> > > well. In Finland there was an Inn for some time that you could live
> >> > > as a Viking. I mean Santa Claus is in Finland for goodness sake. If
> >> > > we used the ram earth technique to build the houses and other such
> >> > > buildings, we can save on costs for construction. We would also be
> >> > > minimally impacting the environment. If a garden for farming was
> >> > > established then the land could become autonomous and eventually turn
> >> > > into a commune where Nova Roman citizens could actually live in the
> >> > > lifestyle they desired. As a Temple to the Roman Gods became
> >> > > established on the land more people would flock to it for it's Pagan
> >> > > connotations. Nova Roma would expand, gaining more wealth for
> >> > > itself, it would spread the word of Nova Roma as people go there to
> >> > > escape mundane life and explore a more "holistic" way of life, in
> >> > > turn this money collected from travelers would go into the Nova Roman
> >> > > pockets where partial investment in precious metals like silver and
> >> > > gold solidify the wealth of Nova Roma. As the construction of the
> >> > > Temple becomes complete the transition from tourist destination
> >> > > begins to change into a commune that is self sufficient and capable
> >> > > of housing Nova Roman citizens. This all while Nova Roma purchases
> >> > > new land to continue the cycle of tourist then commune. Has this
> >> > > ever been considered by Nova Roman officials? What steps are there
> >> > > to further the goal of physical manifestation of our place in this
> >> > > world? Meetings are fine and all, but a central hub where Nova
> >> > > Romans can gather and LIVE in the lifestyle we choose, what is being
> >> > > to done to carry this out?
> >> > >
> >> > > Also, is there going to be a meet up in the US or isn't there? I've
> >> > > been trying to pay attention.
> >> > >
> >> > > And is it okay to have a tunic but not a toga?
> >> > >
> >> > > What is the proper way to address members of the Senate and other
> >> > > such Magistrates?
> >> > >
> >> > > And how come I haven't been assigned to my tribe yet?
> >> > >
> >> > > These and other questions should probably stay in my head. Until
> >> > > next time...
> >> > >
> >> > > Valete.
> >> > >
> >> >
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------------
> >
> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> Version: 8.5.339 / Virus Database: 270.12.80/2187 - Release Date: 06/19/09
> 06:53:00
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67586 From: Maior Date: 2009-06-20
Subject: Colonia Nova Roma
Salvete;
I know we have a colonia list, for those interested in founding a NR colony. But we should talk about it here on the ML. Andy his critique said this was impossible. And I disagree. If we have the will and the citizens we can do it.

Quadratus wrote the post below. We've been talking on the NRcolonia list, I and Livia and I daresay Scholastica would agree; see our colonia self-supporting by giving spoken Latin sessions, like summer school in a Roman environment.

Quadratus, where are you talking about? the U.S. I presume. Is the land near anything? A town, nightlife...Being off the grid and making our own electricity and having our own well is excellent. I'm learning right now to grow vegetables for home consumption, (the gourmet kind). So this is my skill. And I'm studying latin and just finished Sermo II.
bene vale
M. Horensia Maior



My main idea is that Nova Roma start forming some serious physical wealth. I
don't want to see it crash. As for land, well raw land was what I had in mind.
I have access to auctions that would allow us to purchase land at around 300 or
less for around an acre or more as the down payment. Monthly fees of 50 to 200
dollars would be required to pay off the land entirely. Since Nova Roma would
be buying the land it would be tax exempt and Nova Roma would not need to pay
land tax. Since it is raw land, Nova Roma can issue the building of a Roman
city from the ground up. Also should Nova Roma decide to hire some workers, the
work paid would also be tax exempt and refunded at the end of the Fiscal year.
So Nova Roma would not be taking any major expenses out of their budget. If I
have to pay for this myself then so be it. I can afford the down payment and
subsequent payments there after. I would just need to transition my business
from physically based to internet based I suppose.

I have some friends who use to work for Micron still have their factory to make
solar cells. Using wind turbines and the solar cells I can get for dirt cheap,
the main office of Nova Roma could be state of the art, or all the houses could
be powered independantly and Nova Roma would not have to worry about electrical
costs. On top of that, if we choose the right land to buy we can build a well
and put a septic tank in the land. Doing so would allow Nova Roma to have its
own water and thus avoid water bills. So if Nova Roma wants to get serious,
I'll get serious and we can find a way so that Nova Roma will not have to pay
land tax, electric bill, or a water bill and only have to focus on getting
customers and paying off the land. I'm ready when they are. Well that's not
true, I would need to transition my work over to be able to support me without
being physical. So in a couple of months I'm ready...in theory.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67587 From: Maior Date: 2009-06-20
Subject: Re: nova roma is syncretic
Salvete;
this is an important point. In Nova Roma there are NO heretics. We are a syncretic Roman polytheistic nation and organization.

Anyone who calls him or herself a Christian is one, full stop. This is the way it was during the republic and empire...later inter group controversies are not our problem and, is luggage, that we thankfully don't need.
Now of course if it were Isis worshippers,well...;-)
M.Hortensia Maior



>
> "Modianus is *not* a "Christian" bishop. He is a gnostic, a sect
> anathemetized by the Church and rejected as heresy."
>
> Gee Cato... you could at least capitalize Gnostic!
>
> Vale;
>
> Modianus
>
> On Sat, Jun 20, 2009 at 1:35 PM, Gaius Equitius Cato <catoinnyc@...>wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > Cato Cornelio Sullae salutem dicit.
> >
> > Salve.
> >
> > Sulla, I earnestly ask that no matter what faults or grievances anyone
> > might have with each other within our Respublica that we honor our Roman
> > names. Even Maior, with whom I have a less-than-amicable realtionship, and I
> > have never resorted to using each others extra-Nova Roman names.
> >
> > It is beneath our collective dignities to do so, and as a fellow senator I
> > ask that you cease.
> >
> > Vale,
> >
> > Cato
> >
> > P.S. - just to be clear, your criticism on one level is incorrect: Modianus
> > is *not* a "Christian" bishop. He is a gnostic, a sect anathemetized by the
> > Church and rejected as heresy. It is not Christianity. GEC
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67588 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2009-06-20
Subject: Re: nova roma is syncretic
Cato omnibus in foro SPD

Salvete.

An incorrect depiction has, once again, been given of my private cultus. "[D]uring the republic" there was no such thing as Christianity, as Christ had yet to be born; long before the end of the Western Empire Christianity had formulated itself in contrast to many various and sundry heresies - among them, Gnosticism.

Valete,

Cato
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67589 From: David Kling Date: 2009-06-20
Subject: Re: nova roma is syncretic
Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus Gaio Equitio Catoni salutem dicit

The difference between Gnosticism and Orthodox Christianity (or say Judaism) is that I can be a member of a (Pagan) Roman reconstructionist organization without any reservations -- in conscious, spiritually, or in any other way.

Vale;

Modianus

On Sat, Jun 20, 2009 at 3:12 PM, Gaius Equitius Cato <catoinnyc@...> wrote:


Cato omnibus in foro SPD

Salvete.

An incorrect depiction has, once again, been given of my private cultus. "[D]uring the republic" there was no such thing as Christianity, as Christ had yet to be born; long before the end of the Western Empire Christianity had formulated itself in contrast to many various and sundry heresies - among them, Gnosticism.

Valete,

Cato




Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67590 From: Steve Moore Date: 2009-06-20
Subject: Re: Digest Number 4586 - Some observations from the peanut gallery

Potitus Poplicola SPD.

 

Thank you. Yes, you’re right—that would be the strict interpretation of the law.

 

Vale.

 


From: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com [mailto:Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Q. Valerius Poplicola
Sent: Saturday, June 20, 2009 5:23 AM
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Digest Number 4586 - Some observations from the peanut gallery

 

Not quite, my friend.

Censor 1: Year A1, B1
Censor 2: Year B1, C1
Censor 3: Year C1, D1 = A2, B2

Because they're overlapping for two years at a time, Modianus is not eligible to run until elections are called in 2010.



Messages in this topic (4) Reply (via web post) | Start a new topic

 

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67591 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2009-06-20
Subject: Re: nova roma is syncretic
Cato Fabio Modiano sal.

Salve.

The state of the relationship between any citizen's private cultus and the State cult is absolutely within their own authority to define as they want. In other words, between them and any or all deities involved - and *only* them.

I personally have no problem being part of the Respublica, and I have no interest in examining the conscience of any other citizen for any purpose regarding their faith other than to ask questions about it to better my own understanding.

Vale,

Cato



--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, David Kling <tau.athanasios@...> wrote:
>
> Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus Gaio Equitio Catoni salutem dicit
>
> The difference between Gnosticism and Orthodox Christianity (or say Judaism)
> is that I can be a member of a (Pagan) Roman reconstructionist organization
> without any reservations -- in conscious, spiritually, or in any other way.
>
> Vale;
>
> Modianus
>
> On Sat, Jun 20, 2009 at 3:12 PM, Gaius Equitius Cato <catoinnyc@...>wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > Cato omnibus in foro SPD
> >
> > Salvete.
> >
> > An incorrect depiction has, once again, been given of my private cultus.
> > "[D]uring the republic" there was no such thing as Christianity, as Christ
> > had yet to be born; long before the end of the Western Empire Christianity
> > had formulated itself in contrast to many various and sundry heresies -
> > among them, Gnosticism.
> >
> > Valete,
> >
> > Cato
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67592 From: Maior Date: 2009-06-20
Subject: Re: nova roma is syncretic
-Salvete;
I was speaking of all culti,Judaism, Zoroastrianism, Isis worshippers, Pythagoreans.

the Romans during the Republic did not have the concept of religious heretics. During the Empire up to Constantine, which the religio here in Nova Roma follows, there wasn't such a concept. There are no heresies and no heretics in Nova Roma.

It is alien to our culture, to the tolerant syncretic place Nova Roma is.

Anyone who calls himself or herself a Christian, is one; gnostic christians, rc christians, orthodox christians, universalists are all equal here. The same if cives worship Isis, Yahweh, Odin, also atheists agnostics, philosophers!

We have the state cultus deorum but for everything else:

All are equal in Nova Roma! We are a liberal tolerant syncretic polytheistic organization.
valete
M.Hortensia Maior


> Salvete.
>
> An incorrect depiction has, once again, been given of my private cultus. "[D]uring the republic" there was no such thing as Christianity, as Christ had yet to be born; long before the end of the Western Empire Christianity had formulated itself in contrast to many various and sundry heresies - among them, Gnosticism.
>
> Valete,
>
> Cato
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67593 From: A. Sempronius Regulus Date: 2009-06-20
Subject: Re: nova roma is syncretic
Salvete,
 
Early "orthodox" Christianity, if you use this profiling software developed by the German Federal Police (former Bundesgrenzschutz), has the same "alert" features as the Taliban and Hezbollah.
 
It took Jewish ethnic and cultic exclusivism (they were content to be left alone and not to go out to forcibly convert the world with missionary zeal) and turned it into the world's first universal exclusivism with a missionary agenda. So, it is more the ancestor of militant Islam than any religion before it. It was its economic and political organization that made it the version Constantine picked. Had the Gnostics become the "official" Christianity (a weird concept because many gnostic groups were so counter-cultural that the very idea of being "official" would seem a betrayal -- but for sake of argument), I doubt the "orthodox" party who have been declared heretics -- just, unenlightened. Of course, it was the militancy that probably made "orthodox" Christianity the early version out of many to be the one to survive and re-write its own history -- and maybe, what became its own scripture. I just read an article out of Claremont Graduate School in NT historical criticism that defends the hypothesis that proto-Luke was probably originally written without Acts and looked much more gnostic or Marcionite than the current version does today and that it was probably Polycarp and company that wrote Acts and re-wrote Luke. Another recent article defended a similar hypothesis about the gospel of John.
 
 
 
Valete,
A. Sempronius Regulus
 
 

--- On Sat, 6/20/09, David Kling <tau.athanasios@...> wrote:

From: David Kling <tau.athanasios@...>
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: nova roma is syncretic
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Date: Saturday, June 20, 2009, 7:24 PM

Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus Gaio Equitio Catoni salutem dicit

The difference between Gnosticism and Orthodox Christianity (or say Judaism) is that I can be a member of a (Pagan) Roman reconstructionist organization without any reservations -- in conscious, spiritually, or in any other way.

Vale;

Modianus

On Sat, Jun 20, 2009 at 3:12 PM, Gaius Equitius Cato <catoinnyc@gmail. com> wrote:


Cato omnibus in foro SPD

Salvete.

An incorrect depiction has, once again, been given of my private cultus. "[D]uring the republic" there was no such thing as Christianity, as Christ had yet to be born; long before the end of the Western Empire Christianity had formulated itself in contrast to many various and sundry heresies - among them, Gnosticism.

Valete,

Cato




Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67594 From: livia_plauta Date: 2009-06-20
Subject: Re: Protecting Our Votes and Future Elections
Salve Caesar,
with this thread you are just proving to everybody that, while Modianus apparently has grown out of adolescence, you have not.

Vale,
Livia
>
> Caesar Modiano SPD
>
> "The Back Alley faction now seem intent on attacking my reputation and so forth in an attempt to drive me from Nova Roma."
>
> A pathetic plea for a rush of supportive posts no doubt. Stay or go from Nova Roma, elevate yourself to rex - your choice and yours alone and frankly I consider your fate inconsequential, but if you mention my name with some blatant public distortion of your departure from the Boni and your reasons for leaving, then expect to be challenged and called on it - every time. If you flout the law and twist it to gain another pointy hat then expect to be challenged and called on it - every time.
>
> I note you studiously avoided denying my account of your departure, your reasons, your actions, the offer of your grubby little secret pact, which was sensible. Unlike you my memory remains intact as does my email storage and screen shot folder.
>
>
>
>
> From: David Kling
> Sent: Saturday, June 20, 2009 10:48 AM
> To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: Protecting Our Votes and Future Elections
>
>
>
>
> Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus S.P.D.
>
> As you will notice, citizens of Nova Roma, that senator Lucius Cornelius Sulla continues to refer to me by my birth name even after I respectfully advised him of my wishes to use my Roman name. The Back Alley faction now seem intent on attacking my reputation and so forth in an attempt to drive me from Nova Roma.
>
> Valete:
>
> Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus
>
>
> On Sat, Jun 20, 2009 at 12:42 PM, Robert Woolwine <l_cornelius_sulla@...> wrote:
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67595 From: David Kling Date: 2009-06-20
Subject: Re: nova roma is syncretic
Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus A. Sempronio Regulo salutem dicit

Do you recall the name of the article from Claremont?  I've read some stuff by some of their faculty (current and emeritus) that I've liked.  I like the process theology that comes out of Claremont -- they are on my short list for PhD applications once I'm done with my masters programs.  Interesting bits about Luke and Acts.  I'm taking a course this summer on "Radical Reformation" and am looking forward to discussions on the Cathers and Bogomils.

Vale;

Modianus

On Sat, Jun 20, 2009 at 4:10 PM, A. Sempronius Regulus <asempronius.regulus@...> wrote:


Salvete,
 
Early "orthodox" Christianity, if you use this profiling software developed by the German Federal Police (former Bundesgrenzschutz), has the same "alert" features as the Taliban and Hezbollah.
 
It took Jewish ethnic and cultic exclusivism (they were content to be left alone and not to go out to forcibly convert the world with missionary zeal) and turned it into the world's first universal exclusivism with a missionary agenda. So, it is more the ancestor of militant Islam than any religion before it. It was its economic and political organization that made it the version Constantine picked. Had the Gnostics become the "official" Christianity (a weird concept because many gnostic groups were so counter-cultural that the very idea of being "official" would seem a betrayal -- but for sake of argument), I doubt the "orthodox" party who have been declared heretics -- just, unenlightened. Of course, it was the militancy that probably made "orthodox" Christianity the early version out of many to be the one to survive and re-write its own history -- and maybe, what became its own scripture. I just read an article out of Claremont Graduate School in NT historical criticism that defends the hypothesis that proto-Luke was probably originally written without Acts and looked much more gnostic or Marcionite than the current version does today and that it was probably Polycarp and company that wrote Acts and re-wrote Luke. Another recent article defended a similar hypothesis about the gospel of John.
 
 
 
Valete,
A. Sempronius Regulus




Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67596 From: A. Sempronius Regulus Date: 2009-06-20
Subject: Re: nova roma is syncretic
Salve,
 
I wouldn't say in ancient Rome all religions were equal. First, foreign deities and cults did not have templum augurially aligned to the heavens for their cella. They just an a surveyed piece of land or fanum. Second, cults that did not recognize the state cult or public cult were not tolerated. Third, cults that appeared to threaten the state were suppressed. The philosophers were thrown out of Rome at one point and Bacchus-Dionysos had issues with the Senate. Basically, cults that did not challenge the public cult of the state were tolerated.
 
Vale,
A. Sempronius Regulus
 
 

--- On Sat, 6/20/09, Maior <rory12001@...> wrote:

From: Maior <rory12001@...>
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: nova roma is syncretic
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Date: Saturday, June 20, 2009, 7:41 PM

-Salvete;
I was speaking of all culti,Judaism, Zoroastrianism, Isis worshippers, Pythagoreans.

the Romans during the Republic did not have the concept of religious heretics. During the Empire up to Constantine, which the religio here in Nova Roma follows, there wasn't such a concept. There are no heresies and no heretics in Nova Roma.

It is alien to our culture, to the tolerant syncretic place Nova Roma is.

Anyone who calls himself or herself a Christian, is one; gnostic christians, rc christians, orthodox christians, universalists are all equal here. The same if cives worship Isis, Yahweh, Odin, also atheists agnostics, philosophers!

We have the state cultus deorum but for everything else:

All are equal in Nova Roma! We are a liberal tolerant syncretic polytheistic organization.
valete
M.Hortensia Maior

> Salvete.
>
> An incorrect depiction has, once again, been given of my private cultus. "[D]uring the republic" there was no such thing as Christianity, as Christ had yet to be born; long before the end of the Western Empire Christianity had formulated itself in contrast to many various and sundry heresies - among them, Gnosticism.
>
> Valete,
>
> Cato
>


Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67597 From: livia_plauta Date: 2009-06-20
Subject: Re: Some questions now that I have peace of mind...
Livia Apollonio sal.

Thanks a lot for the information on silver clay!
I found that it's solt in Italy, as bronze and copper clay too. I calculated that bronze clay is actually cheaper than fusion in sylicone moulds. This means new possibilities for my reproductions of roman objects!

I'll try to get it, and see if it can be worked in moulds like clay. In that case series production should be possible. If I had know it existed, it would have saved me a lot of trouble when designing a ring for italian NR members. I had to smelt lead and work it to make the prototype.

Also, it could solve the problem of how to make hollow bronze objects. I guess making a bronze oil lamp is no longer an unreachable goal. And the best part is that the metal can be worked as normal metal when it's hardened!

Optime vale,
Livia

>
> N. Apollonius Quadratus Maior et Liviae salutem plurimam dicit.
>
> Thank you for the links. Sounds like I just need to get off my lazy roman butt and get to work. As for silver clay... PMC was invented by the Mitsubishi company and sold in electrostatic sealed bags. The metal itself is micro particles bonded via organic polymers. When heated to the right temperature via kiln or blowtorch, the organic binding ignites and burns away. What is left is a pure silver (.999) trinket of whatever it was you made. The organic polymers allow for molding like clay. The PMC line consists of Copper, Brass, Silver, and Gold, with some talks of Platinum being in the works (not really likely I suspect).
>
> My main idea is that Nova Roma start forming some serious physical wealth. I don't want to see it crash. As for land, well raw land was what I had in mind. I have access to auctions that would allow us to purchase land at around 300 or less for around an acre or more as the down payment. Monthly fees of 50 to 200 dollars would be required to pay off the land entirely. Since Nova Roma would be buying the land it would be tax exempt and Nova Roma would not need to pay land tax. Since it is raw land, Nova Roma can issue the building of a Roman city from the ground up. Also should Nova Roma decide to hire some workers, the work paid would also be tax exempt and refunded at the end of the Fiscal year. So Nova Roma would not be taking any major expenses out of their budget. If I have to pay for this myself then so be it. I can afford the down payment and subsequent payments there after. I would just need to transition my business from physically based to internet based I suppose.
>
> I have some friends who use to work for Micron still have their factory to make solar cells. Using wind turbines and the solar cells I can get for dirt cheap, the main office of Nova Roma could be state of the art, or all the houses could be powered independantly and Nova Roma would not have to worry about electrical costs. On top of that, if we choose the right land to buy we can build a well and put a septic tank in the land. Doing so would allow Nova Roma to have its own water and thus avoid water bills. So if Nova Roma wants to get serious, I'll get serious and we can find a way so that Nova Roma will not have to pay land tax, electric bill, or a water bill and only have to focus on getting customers and paying off the land. I'm ready when they are. Well that's not true, I would need to transition my work over to be able to support me without being physical. So in a couple of months I'm ready...in theory.
>
> Valete.
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Maior" <rory12001@> wrote:
> >
> > Salve Apolloni;
> > M. Lucretius Agricola our former webmaster, organized the coin minting group and is very keen on coins and minting them so do contact him.
> >
> > and I too am on the Coloniae Romanae list, I'd love to live part of the year as a Roman with other Romans.
> >
> > bene vale
> > Maior
> >
> >
> > > Salve Apolloni,
> > > I forgot to mention that there's a group called Coloniae Romanae (http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Coloniae-Romanae/) all dedicated to projects like the one you mention of buildin a "roman " vacation resort. At the moment the list is very quiet. It seems that most people are interested in theory, but don't want to invest money themselves, and/or don't have the competences necessary for starting a project of this scope.
> > >
> > > I'm currently in Bulgaria, and here the prices wouldn't be impossible. I've seen an ad for a 5-room stone house for sale for 15 thousand euros. The only problem is that it's 68 Kms from the seaside. Land is to be had cheaply too (but more expensive as one approaches the seaside), and probably because of the cheap labour it could make sense to start such a project here.
> > >
> > > Optime vale,
> > > Livia
> > >
> > >
> > > > Omnibus Salvete
> > > >
> > > > I've been trying to get into Nova Roma IRC for sometime now, and I am using Firefox 3, and I am using chatzilla? It's the IRC plug in for Firefox. Every time I try to connect, it says either refused or timed out. Now I changed my name over to N_Apollonius_Quadratus, so that shouldn't be an issue. I turned on and off my fire wall to see if that was an issue, and it wasn't. Is there something I'm missing?
> > > >
> > > > Also, what does it cost the government to print the Nova Roma coins? I like that there is coinage being produced, but they are brass. Nothing wrong with brass, but let's give Nova Roma a little kick in the tail. Now if Nova Roma doesn't have Tax Exempt status it sure needs to get it fast. That way authorized members of Nova Roma can go out and purchase PMC (precious metal clay). This clay is .999 pure silver. Well if you get the silver. The gold is a little hefty and getting copper isn't a bad idea. Since the authorized individual purchased the clay for Nova Roma, then Nova Roma owns that clay. This is a tax write off and will be refunded at the next tax returns. The silver is classified as basic operating expenses as the silver will be minted in Nova Roma fashion. Now Nova Roma has some serious pulling weight. Real silver coins to give buying power to the Ordo Equestor, and the Copper coinage would also bring more buying power. Now instead of blank fiat money polluting Nova Roma, we have actual real wealth on which to pull from. Not only that, but should the silver market rise, so too will Nova Roma's wealth. If every citizen of Nova Roma purchased one box of PMC and donated it to Nova Roma, and Nova Roma purchased some PMC for itself, then Nova Roma will begin to have some serious wealth being developed that will not depreciate. The people who donated the PMC will be able to declare the silver as a donation and be refunded for the cost of the PMC. Realistically the cost of PMC is higher than the cost of silver as it stands, but the cost isn't a factor as the expense is refunded since it was a donation.
> > > >
> > > > What is Nova Roma doing about expansion? If Nova Roma is not a tax exempt organization it needs to be quickly. As such puting down payments on land would place Nova Roma as the sole owner of that land, and there would be no land tax and the cost of purchasing that land would be refunded. On top of that, Nova Roma can take care of other costs by building on the land making it a sort of vacation spot for people to live an "authentic" Roman lifestyle. There are all sorts of quirky places like that riddling the US and other places as well. In Finland there was an Inn for some time that you could live as a Viking. I mean Santa Claus is in Finland for goodness sake. If we used the ram earth technique to build the houses and other such buildings, we can save on costs for construction. We would also be minimally impacting the environment. If a garden for farming was established then the land could become autonomous and eventually turn into a commune where Nova Roman citizens could actually live in the lifestyle they desired. As a Temple to the Roman Gods became established on the land more people would flock to it for it's Pagan connotations. Nova Roma would expand, gaining more wealth for itself, it would spread the word of Nova Roma as people go there to escape mundane life and explore a more "holistic" way of life, in turn this money collected from travelers would go into the Nova Roman pockets where partial investment in precious metals like silver and gold solidify the wealth of Nova Roma. As the construction of the Temple becomes complete the transition from tourist destination begins to change into a commune that is self sufficient and capable of housing Nova Roman citizens. This all while Nova Roma purchases new land to continue the cycle of tourist then commune. Has this ever been considered by Nova Roman officials? What steps are there to further the goal of physical manifestation of our place in this world? Meetings are fine and all, but a central hub where Nova Romans can gather and LIVE in the lifestyle we choose, what is being to done to carry this out?
> > > >
> > > > Also, is there going to be a meet up in the US or isn't there? I've been trying to pay attention.
> > > >
> > > > And is it okay to have a tunic but not a toga?
> > > >
> > > > What is the proper way to address members of the Senate and other such Magistrates?
> > > >
> > > > And how come I haven't been assigned to my tribe yet?
> > > >
> > > > These and other questions should probably stay in my head. Until next time...
> > > >
> > > > Valete.
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67598 From: Maior Date: 2009-06-20
Subject: Re: nova roma is syncretic
Salve Regule;
thanks for the clarification, which is totally spot on, periodically chaldeans, jews, were expelled to for threatening the state too. Beard and North has a good chapter on 'patrolling the perimeter.'

A big ongoing problem in NR has been cultural definition. If we have a unified culture, we'll be fine. Roman polytheistic values define Nova Roma and Nova Romans.
When people start identifying as 'orthodox' and the other as a 'heretic' well it's fine in your church but its not in Nova Roma. One version of christianity isn't better or more correct here.

The elite pretty much loathed Isis' cultus but the people loved it. I'm more traditionally Roman myself and stick to Fortuna or Bona Dea. But NR is more broad-minded and its okay here to be an Isis worshipper;-)
bene vale
Maior

>
> Salve,
>  
> I wouldn't say in ancient Rome all religions were equal. First, foreign deities and cults did not have templum augurially aligned to the heavens for their cella. They just an a surveyed piece of land or fanum. Second, cults that did not recognize the state cult or public cult were not tolerated. Third, cults that appeared to threaten the state were suppressed. The philosophers were thrown out of Rome at one point and Bacchus-Dionysos had issues with the Senate. Basically, cults that did not challenge the public cult of the state were tolerated.
>  
> Vale,
> A. Sempronius Regulus
>  
>  
>
> --- On Sat, 6/20/09, Maior <rory12001@...> wrote:
>
>
> From: Maior <rory12001@...>
> Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: nova roma is syncretic
> To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> Date: Saturday, June 20, 2009, 7:41 PM
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> -Salvete;
> I was speaking of all culti,Judaism, Zoroastrianism, Isis worshippers, Pythagoreans.
>
> the Romans during the Republic did not have the concept of religious heretics. During the Empire up to Constantine, which the religio here in Nova Roma follows, there wasn't such a concept. There are no heresies and no heretics in Nova Roma.
>
> It is alien to our culture, to the tolerant syncretic place Nova Roma is.
>
> Anyone who calls himself or herself a Christian, is one; gnostic christians, rc christians, orthodox christians, universalists are all equal here. The same if cives worship Isis, Yahweh, Odin, also atheists agnostics, philosophers!
>
> We have the state cultus deorum but for everything else:
>
> All are equal in Nova Roma! We are a liberal tolerant syncretic polytheistic organization.
> valete
> M.Hortensia Maior
>
> > Salvete.
> >
> > An incorrect depiction has, once again, been given of my private cultus. "[D]uring the republic" there was no such thing as Christianity, as Christ had yet to be born; long before the end of the Western Empire Christianity had formulated itself in contrast to many various and sundry heresies - among them, Gnosticism.
> >
> > Valete,
> >
> > Cato
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67599 From: livia_plauta Date: 2009-06-20
Subject: Re: Digest Number 4586 - Some observations from the peanut gallery
Salve Andy,
I wish some of the people here would take your advice. Unfortunately their aim seems to be to drive constructive people like you away. I seems they succeed in 95% of the cases.
Then they complai because NR has few assidui.

Vale
Livia

> potential benefits involved. Like Roman politics that much? Stop by a hobby shop, Reiner Knizia's game "Quo Vadis" and invite some friends over
> for an evening of politicking and wine. You'll have more fun.
>
> Let's face it - if this were the real Roman Republic and/or people wanted to really resolve the recent NR problems "in the Roman way", one or both factions
> would head down to the local gladiatorial school with a sack of denarii, hire a pack of goons and waylay their opponents on the road to Praeneste. Anyone
> familiar with the Gracchi brothers, Sullan proscriptions, Catilinian conspiracy or the civil wars knows this. So, when one or the other side lays claim to
> doing things "in the Roman way", let's face it this is a more civilized age and noone here is doing things as the Romans themselves would have.
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67600 From: Kirsteen Wright Date: 2009-06-20
Subject: Re: nova roma is syncretic
On Sat, Jun 20, 2009 at 7:51 PM, Maior <rory12001@...> wrote:
 We are a syncretic Roman polytheistic nation and organization.

 
I'm always curious as to just how syncretic the Romans actually were and how much is us imposing our modern ideas on them.

Beard & North discuss it  and raise several issues, arguing that we have to be very careful how we interpret things  to ensure we're not putting our own interpretation on them. They state that  "In Roman Britain, for example, we find a wide variety of  hybrids, 'Mars Alator', 'Sul Minerva' and so on. In most cases, however, we have only the record of a mixed divine name; we can only guess what that name meant, which deity (Roman or native) was uppermost in the minds of worshippers, or whether the two had merged into a composite whole (a process often now referred to as syncretism); we do not know, in other words, how far the process was an aspect of Roman take-over (and ultimately obliteration) of native deities, how far a mutually respectful union of two divine powers, or how far it was a minimal, resistant and token incorporation of Roman Imperial paraphernalia on the part of the provincials. Signs of 'syncretism', then ,always need to be interpreted".

I'm genuinely interested in just how syncretic were the Romans.

Flavia Lucilla Merula
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67601 From: violetphearsen@yahoo.com Date: 2009-06-20
Subject: Re: Protecting Our Votes and Future Elections
<<--- On Fri, 6/19/09, wuffa2001 <magewuffa@...> wrote:
If you're going to say anything in this Forum about any politically thorny issue the people may use all the old roman debate tricks of the trade on you!>>
 
I am not debating with anybody. Tricks? Ah, so you were using a "trick". Since I do not use "tricks", I did not recognize your use of "tricks". Thank you for explaining to me that you employ "tricks". Citizens of Nova Roma, we have now been warned.
 
<<With all due respect, if your going to talk politics you going to have mud. And you should expect to be muddied.>>
 
I completely disagree. I think we can discuss political issues without the "mud".
 

<<If you would stop trying to use your priestly office for politically ends and stop using the words like all the gods think this or that. Then, you will not be muddied. However you think you can have your cake and eat it too, that is not so.>>
 
You are in total error, sir. I have never used my sacred office for political ends of any kind. I have no political aspirations of any sort and I have already said so on this list. When I was offered a seat in the Senate, I respectfully declined it.
I did not say anything about the Gods in my post. I did once before in a post some time ago and I was kindly corrected by one of our esteemed Pontifices.


<<Stay clear of the politically thorny issue and I will have a lot more respect for you and your office.>>
 
Many Vestals spoke their minds on the issues of their day and no one ever told them to "stay clear" of any issue. If you find you cannot respect me for speaking my mind, that is your own affair, but regardless of what you think of me, respect for the sacred office of the Vestals should be viewed apart from your own feelings towards any one Vestal in particular. 

<<,If you want to talk about any politically thorny issue do so without any office at the signoff and you and i will get along just fine anyone who uses there priestly office for politically power and uses as badly as you have done does not have my respect.>>
 
Sir, I do not need your permission or your approval as to how I sign or do not sign my posts, thank you.


<<Learn how the game was played (politica games of power) use the tools the romans did; and learn to take those consequences the good and the bad.>>
 
Games? I do not play "games" of any sort, not with anyone. I speak my mind on occasion and when I do, I state the truth as I see it. Some may agree with me and some may not. I have no problem with that, but I do have a problem with any man who presumes to tell me when I can comment and when I cannot. Just because I became a Vestal does not mean I gave up my right to speak up when I feel impelled to do so, and on any issue, political or otherwise. In fact, I urge all the women of Nova Roma to speak their minds when they so feel the need to do so on any issue. Whether I agree with their views or not, I will always support the right of all Nova Roman women to speak up, Vestals included.
 
Maxima Valeria Messallina
Sacerdos Vestalis

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67602 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2009-06-20
Subject: Re: nova roma is syncretic
Cato Sempronio Regulo sal.

Salve.

I believe the Jews were thrown out of at least the City of Rome several times as well.

Also, here in the Respblica we contain within our own time frame everything up to the removal of the Altar of Victory from the Senate, I believe, which post-dates Constantine the Great by about a century.

Curiously, our opening remarks on the wiki site have been changed, so thatthey now read (in incredibly ungrammatical fashion):

"From its founding to 330 CE, when it ceased to be the center of Imperial authority, Rome laid the foundation for our modern Western civilization."

Thank goodness our Constitution has not been so vandalized, and it reads:

"...defined as the period from the founding of the City of Rome in 753 BCE to the removal of the altar of Victory from the Senate in 394 CE..."

I do not know who changed the wording of our opening statement or why, but would be interested in knowing. Can we find out when and who and why this was altered to read this way?

Vale,

Cato

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "A. Sempronius Regulus" <asempronius.regulus@...> wrote:
>
> Salve,
>  
> I wouldn't say in ancient Rome all religions were equal. First, foreign deities and cults did not have templum augurially aligned to the heavens for their cella. They just an a surveyed piece of land or fanum. Second, cults that did not recognize the state cult or public cult were not tolerated. Third, cults that appeared to threaten the state were suppressed. The philosophers were thrown out of Rome at one point and Bacchus-Dionysos had issues with the Senate. Basically, cults that did not challenge the public cult of the state were tolerated.
>  
> Vale,
> A. Sempronius Regulus
>  
>  
>
> --- On Sat, 6/20/09, Maior <rory12001@...> wrote:
>
>
> From: Maior <rory12001@...>
> Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: nova roma is syncretic
> To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> Date: Saturday, June 20, 2009, 7:41 PM
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> -Salvete;
> I was speaking of all culti,Judaism, Zoroastrianism, Isis worshippers, Pythagoreans.
>
> the Romans during the Republic did not have the concept of religious heretics. During the Empire up to Constantine, which the religio here in Nova Roma follows, there wasn't such a concept. There are no heresies and no heretics in Nova Roma.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67603 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2009-06-20
Subject: Re: Colonia Nova Roma
Re: [Nova-Roma] Colonia Nova Roma

  
A. Tullia Scholastica M. Hortensiae Majori quiritibus, sociis, peregrinisque bonae voluntatis S.P.D.
  

Salvete;
 I know we have a colonia list, for those interested in founding a NR colony. But we should talk about it here on the ML. Andy his critique said this was impossible. And I disagree. If we have the will and the citizens we can do it.

    ATS:  And I also disagree.  

Quadratus wrote the post below. We've been talking on the NRcolonia list, I and Livia and I daresay Scholastica would agree; see our colonia self-supporting by giving spoken Latin sessions, like summer school in a Roman environment.

    ATS:  That would be part of the package, along with sales of crafts and produce, tours, etc.

Quadratus, where are you talking about? the U.S. I presume. Is the land near anything? A town, nightlife...Being off the grid and making our own electricity and having our own well is excellent.

    ATS:  Utilities and some other factors were considerations in our earlier investigations.   A lot of us don’t need nightlife of that sort, but the proximity of supermarkets and something resembling pharmacies and clothing stores, to say nothing of medical facilities, is of considerable importance.  So, too, is that of related sites to draw tourists.  Unfortunately, most of us are busy, some of us live in areas where travel is inadvisable in winter, and none of us appears to be wealthy, so we have not been able to do much more than discuss qualities desirable in a prospective piece of land.  We would have to have multiple colonies, not just one, but at least one in Europe and one in the Americas.  One has to consider the language issue as well as everything else, especially in Europe; on this side of the pond, there are essentially four official languages (English, French, Spanish, and Portuguese, two of which are more or less geographically restricted), whereas there are many in Europe, and several are little-known outside of their immediate vicinity, whereas three of the four languages in the Americas are well known.  It is daunting enough to travel in lands where one does not know the language; living there is another, and far more challenging, situation, especially when one has to start from scratch rather than stay in an existing dwelling.  I don’t think that the European Union has gotten around to adopting our language as universal just yet, and do not expect that shopkeepers or real estate agents in, say, Bulgaria, speak Latin.  Maybe Finland; there are lots of fine Latinists there...


I'm learning right now to grow vegetables for home consumption, (the gourmet kind).

    ATS:  Good!  The ordinary ones are useful, too...even more so.  


So this is my skill. And I'm studying latin and just finished Sermo II.


    ATS:  Not just yet, young lady:  Avitus just returned and has given us a number of posts to answer, and one of these days will provide the information I need to correct the Sermo II finals, which will then be sent to him for review.  Assuming you pass, then, and only then, will you be liberated fully...and in the mean time I have to nag the Sermo I and Grammatica II students to return their exams as well as correct the GL II exams as they come in.  

 bene vale
 M. Horensia Maior

Vale, et valete.  



My main idea is that Nova Roma start forming some serious physical wealth. I
don't want to see it crash. As for land, well raw land was what I had in mind.
I have access to auctions that would allow us to purchase land at around 300 or
less for around an acre or more as the down payment. Monthly fees of 50 to 200
dollars would be required to pay off the land entirely. Since Nova Roma would
be buying the land it would be tax exempt and Nova Roma would not need to pay
land tax. Since it is raw land, Nova Roma can issue the building of a Roman
city from the ground up. Also should Nova Roma decide to hire some workers, the
work paid would also be tax exempt and refunded at the end of the Fiscal year.
So Nova Roma would not be taking any major expenses out of their budget. If I
have to pay for this myself then so be it. I can afford the down payment and
subsequent payments there after. I would just need to transition my business
from physically based to internet based I suppose.

I have some friends who use to work for Micron still have their factory to make
solar cells. Using wind turbines and the solar cells I can get for dirt cheap,
the main office of Nova Roma could be state of the art, or all the houses could
be powered independantly and Nova Roma would not have to worry about electrical
costs. On top of that, if we choose the right land to buy we can build a well
and put a septic tank in the land. Doing so would allow Nova Roma to have its
own water and thus avoid water bills. So if Nova Roma wants to get serious,
I'll get serious and we can find a way so that Nova Roma will not have to pay
land tax, electric bill, or a water bill and only have to focus on getting
customers and paying off the land. I'm ready when they are. Well that's not
true, I would need to transition my work over to be able to support me without
being physical. So in a couple of months I'm ready...in theory.

  
    
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67604 From: QFabiusMaxmi@aol.com Date: 2009-06-20
Subject: Re: passing Imperium
In a message dated 6/20/2009 12:41:09 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time, marminius@... writes:
About the Comitia Curiata; L. Cornelius still is in the list of Lictores Curiatii:
http://www.novaroma .org/nr/Comitia_ Curiata_% 28Nova_Roma% 29

His album civium account has him as Lictor, for nearly ten years:
http://www.novaroma .org/civitas/ album?id= 8
Thank you for the information Marcus Arminius Maior.  I will inform Lucius Cornelius.

Q Fabius Maximus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67605 From: violetphearsen@yahoo.com Date: 2009-06-20
Subject: Re: Regrets
No, you do not deserve that! You deserve forgiveness and for your apology to be accepted and it was wholeheartedly! I hold absolutely no rancor in my heart for you and never have. I was hurt by Fabius' comments because he is a Pontifex, but I was more upset seeing your name because I had always thought we were friends and suddenly, I was wondering what had I done to incur such comments? Then you apologized and I realized you had just fallen in with a bad crowd. It speaks volumnes of you for apologizing and leaving the virulent mob behind. I always thought you were a very sweet lady and my opinion has not changed. Now, please do not give it another thought!
 
Maxima Valeria Messallina
 

--- On Sat, 6/20/09, Diana Octavia Aventina <roman.babe@...> wrote:

From: Diana Octavia Aventina <roman.babe@...>
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Regrets
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Date: Saturday, June 20, 2009, 2:53 AM

Salvete all (and especially our Vestal virgin),

You know, I've said a lot of rude things to people over the years, and there
is only one thing that keeps replaying over and over in my mind that I
really really regret- and those were the horribly rude comments that I made
about our Vestal virgin in the BA. I won't repeat them, because I cringe
everytime I think of them. Someone hit the nail on the head when they said
that I made those comments just as I would have made a comment about a
catholic priest. I didn't think of a person as a Vestal virgin. I just
spontaneously and stupidly wrote 2 nasty things in a row. Then once I saw
that our Vestal virgin was upset, it hit me that I was actually commented
rudely about a real flesh and blood woman whom I always liked and who was
always very sweet to me.. Then the reality set in and I thought "What kind
of diarhea has been flowing out of my mouth for the last few years?". I
would never ever say anything so hurtful in real life to anyone. In fact, I
always go out of my way to say nice things to people....

So once again I am extremely & very much sorry for saying those horrible
things about a lady who did not deserve it. My 'penance' is that I keep
replaying it over and over in my head and feel totally embarrassed and
guilty each time.. I deserve to feel horrible about this.
Valete,
Diana

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67606 From: Maior Date: 2009-06-20
Subject: Re: Protecting Our Votes and Future Elections
Salve Valeria Messalina;
it has been noted and not by a female either, that there is a distincly misogynistic tone used by some against the Nova Roman women who speak up. Sexist and dismissive. I've had those posts from Poplicola, Cato, Paulinus, just recently.
It's rude and has no place in Nova Roma, and no sexism isn't 'mos'. I've heard that old argument done to death..
bene vale
Maior



> Sir, I do not need your permission or your approval as to how I sign or do not sign my posts, thank you.
>
>
> <<Learn how the game was played (politica games of power) use the tools the romans did; and learn to take those consequences the good and the bad.>>
>  
> In fact, I urge all the women of Nova Roma to speak their minds when they so feel the need to do so on any issue. Whether I agree with their views or not, I will always support the right of all Nova Roman women to speak up, Vestals included.
>  
> Maxima Valeria Messallina
> Sacerdos Vestalis
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67607 From: Maior Date: 2009-06-20
Subject: Re: Colonia Nova Roma
M. Hortensia A.Tullia spd;
actually Quadratus has some land and says he has the know-how to put up earth bulidings and pour Roman concrete. So it's not a pipe dream at all. If we can organize. We'd have a permanent base for our Conventus as well.
bene vale
Maior
> >
> >
> > Salvete;
> > I know we have a colonia list, for those interested in founding a NR colony.
> > But we should talk about it here on the ML. Andy his critique said this was
> > impossible. And I disagree. If we have the will and the citizens we can do it.
> >
> > ATS: And I also disagree.
> >
> > Quadratus wrote the post below. We've been talking on the NRcolonia list, I
> > and Livia and I daresay Scholastica would agree; see our colonia
> > self-supporting by giving spoken Latin sessions, like summer school in a Roman
> > environment.
> >
> > ATS: That would be part of the package, along with sales of crafts and
> > produce, tours, etc.
> >
> > Quadratus, where are you talking about? the U.S. I presume. Is the land near
> > anything? A town, nightlife...Being off the grid and making our own
> > electricity and having our own well is excellent.
> >
> > ATS: Utilities and some other factors were considerations in our earlier
> > investigations. A lot of us don¹t need nightlife of that sort, but the
> > proximity of supermarkets and something resembling pharmacies and clothing
> > stores, to say nothing of medical facilities, is of considerable importance.
> > So, too, is that of related sites to draw tourists. Unfortunately, most of us
> > are busy, some of us live in areas where travel is inadvisable in winter, and
> > none of us appears to be wealthy, so we have not been able to do much more
> > than discuss qualities desirable in a prospective piece of land. We would
> > have to have multiple colonies, not just one, but at least one in Europe and
> > one in the Americas. One has to consider the language issue as well as
> > everything else, especially in Europe; on this side of the pond, there are
> > essentially four official languages (English, French, Spanish, and Portuguese,
> > two of which are more or less geographically restricted), whereas there are
> > many in Europe, and several are little-known outside of their immediate
> > vicinity, whereas three of the four languages in the Americas are well known.
> > It is daunting enough to travel in lands where one does not know the language;
> > living there is another, and far more challenging, situation, especially when
> > one has to start from scratch rather than stay in an existing dwelling. I
> > don¹t think that the European Union has gotten around to adopting our language
> > as universal just yet, and do not expect that shopkeepers or real estate
> > agents in, say, Bulgaria, speak Latin. Maybe Finland; there are lots of fine
> > Latinists there...
> >
> >
> > I'm learning right now to grow vegetables for home consumption, (the gourmet
> > kind).
> >
> > ATS: Good! The ordinary ones are useful, too...even more so.
> >
> >
> > So this is my skill. And I'm studying latin and just finished Sermo II.
> >
> >
> > ATS: Not just yet, young lady: Avitus just returned and has given us a
> > number of posts to answer, and one of these days will provide the information
> > I need to correct the Sermo II finals, which will then be sent to him for
> > review. Assuming you pass, then, and only then, will you be liberated
> > fully...and in the mean time I have to nag the Sermo I and Grammatica II
> > students to return their exams as well as correct the GL II exams as they come
> > in.
> >
> > bene vale
> > M. Horensia Maior
> >
> > Vale, et valete.
> >
> >
> >
> > My main idea is that Nova Roma start forming some serious physical wealth. I
> > don't want to see it crash. As for land, well raw land was what I had in mind.
> > I have access to auctions that would allow us to purchase land at around 300
> > or
> > less for around an acre or more as the down payment. Monthly fees of 50 to 200
> > dollars would be required to pay off the land entirely. Since Nova Roma would
> > be buying the land it would be tax exempt and Nova Roma would not need to pay
> > land tax. Since it is raw land, Nova Roma can issue the building of a Roman
> > city from the ground up. Also should Nova Roma decide to hire some workers,
> > the
> > work paid would also be tax exempt and refunded at the end of the Fiscal year.
> > So Nova Roma would not be taking any major expenses out of their budget. If I
> > have to pay for this myself then so be it. I can afford the down payment and
> > subsequent payments there after. I would just need to transition my business
> > from physically based to internet based I suppose.
> >
> > I have some friends who use to work for Micron still have their factory to
> > make
> > solar cells. Using wind turbines and the solar cells I can get for dirt cheap,
> > the main office of Nova Roma could be state of the art, or all the houses
> > could
> > be powered independantly and Nova Roma would not have to worry about
> > electrical
> > costs. On top of that, if we choose the right land to buy we can build a well
> > and put a septic tank in the land. Doing so would allow Nova Roma to have its
> > own water and thus avoid water bills. So if Nova Roma wants to get serious,
> > I'll get serious and we can find a way so that Nova Roma will not have to pay
> > land tax, electric bill, or a water bill and only have to focus on getting
> > customers and paying off the land. I'm ready when they are. Well that's not
> > true, I would need to transition my work over to be able to support me without
> > being physical. So in a couple of months I'm ready...in theory.
> >
> >
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67608 From: Maxima Valeria Messallina Date: 2009-06-20
Subject: Re: Colonia Nova Roma
Where there is a will, there is a way.
 
Maxima Valeria Messallina
Sacerdos Vestalis


--- On Sat, 6/20/09, Maior <rory12001@...> wrote:

From: Maior <rory12001@...>
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Colonia Nova Roma
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Date: Saturday, June 20, 2009, 2:58 PM

M. Hortensia A.Tullia spd;
actually Quadratus has some land and says he has the know-how to put up earth bulidings and pour Roman concrete. So it's not a pipe dream at all. If we can organize. We'd have a permanent base for our Conventus as well.
bene vale
Maior
> >
> >
> > Salvete;
> > I know we have a colonia list, for those interested in founding a NR colony.
> > But we should talk about it here on the ML. Andy his critique said this was
> > impossible. And I disagree. If we have the will and the citizens we can do it.
> >
> > ATS: And I also disagree.
> >
> > Quadratus wrote the post below. We've been talking on the NRcolonia list, I
> > and Livia and I daresay Scholastica would agree; see our colonia
> > self-supporting by giving spoken Latin sessions, like summer school in a Roman
> > environment.
> >
> > ATS: That would be part of the package, along with sales of crafts and
> > produce, tours, etc.
> >
> > Quadratus, where are you talking about? the U.S. I presume. Is the land near
> > anything? A town, nightlife... Being off the grid and making our own
> > electricity and having our own well is excellent.
> >
> > ATS: Utilities and some other factors were considerations in our earlier
> > investigations. A lot of us don¹t need nightlife of that sort, but the
> > proximity of supermarkets and something resembling pharmacies and clothing
> > stores, to say nothing of medical facilities, is of considerable importance.
> > So, too, is that of related sites to draw tourists. Unfortunately, most of us
> > are busy, some of us live in areas where travel is inadvisable in winter, and
> > none of us appears to be wealthy, so we have not been able to do much more
> > than discuss qualities desirable in a prospective piece of land. We would
> > have to have multiple colonies, not just one, but at least one in Europe and
> > one in the Americas. One has to consider the language issue as well as
> > everything else, especially in Europe; on this side of the pond, there are
> > essentially four official languages (English, French, Spanish, and Portuguese,
> > two of which are more or less geographically restricted), whereas there are
> > many in Europe, and several are little-known outside of their immediate
> > vicinity, whereas three of the four languages in the Americas are well known.
> > It is daunting enough to travel in lands where one does not know the language;
> > living there is another, and far more challenging, situation, especially when
> > one has to start from scratch rather than stay in an existing dwelling. I
> > don¹t think that the European Union has gotten around to adopting our language
> > as universal just yet, and do not expect that shopkeepers or real estate
> > agents in, say, Bulgaria, speak Latin. Maybe Finland; there are lots of fine
> > Latinists there...
> >
> >
> > I'm learning right now to grow vegetables for home consumption, (the gourmet
> > kind).
> >
> > ATS: Good! The ordinary ones are useful, too...even more so.
> >
> >
> > So this is my skill. And I'm studying latin and just finished Sermo II.
> >
> >
> > ATS: Not just yet, young lady: Avitus just returned and has given us a
> > number of posts to answer, and one of these days will provide the information
> > I need to correct the Sermo II finals, which will then be sent to him for
> > review. Assuming you pass, then, and only then, will you be liberated
> > fully...and in the mean time I have to nag the Sermo I and Grammatica II
> > students to return their exams as well as correct the GL II exams as they come
> > in.
> >
> > bene vale
> > M. Horensia Maior
> >
> > Vale, et valete.
> >
> >
> >
> > My main idea is that Nova Roma start forming some serious physical wealth. I
> > don't want to see it crash. As for land, well raw land was what I had in mind.
> > I have access to auctions that would allow us to purchase land at around 300
> > or
> > less for around an acre or more as the down payment. Monthly fees of 50 to 200
> > dollars would be required to pay off the land entirely. Since Nova Roma would
> > be buying the land it would be tax exempt and Nova Roma would not need to pay
> > land tax. Since it is raw land, Nova Roma can issue the building of a Roman
> > city from the ground up. Also should Nova Roma decide to hire some workers,
> > the
> > work paid would also be tax exempt and refunded at the end of the Fiscal year.
> > So Nova Roma would not be taking any major expenses out of their budget. If I
> > have to pay for this myself then so be it. I can afford the down payment and
> > subsequent payments there after. I would just need to transition my business
> > from physically based to internet based I suppose.
> >
> > I have some friends who use to work for Micron still have their factory to
> > make
> > solar cells. Using wind turbines and the solar cells I can get for dirt cheap,
> > the main office of Nova Roma could be state of the art, or all the houses
> > could
> > be powered independantly and Nova Roma would not have to worry about
> > electrical
> > costs. On top of that, if we choose the right land to buy we can build a well
> > and put a septic tank in the land. Doing so would allow Nova Roma to have its
> > own water and thus avoid water bills. So if Nova Roma wants to get serious,
> > I'll get serious and we can find a way so that Nova Roma will not have to pay
> > land tax, electric bill, or a water bill and only have to focus on getting
> > customers and paying off the land. I'm ready when they are. Well that's not
> > true, I would need to transition my work over to be able to support me without
> > being physical. So in a couple of months I'm ready...in theory.
> >
> >
> >
>


Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67609 From: C. Maria Caeca Date: 2009-06-20
Subject: Re: Colonia Nova Roma
Salvete,
 
I would appreciate if someone could send me subscription information for the Colonia list.  I am hearing things that sound both feasible and most interesting.
 
Respectfully,
C. Maria Caeca
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Saturday, June 20, 2009 6:57 PM
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: Colonia Nova Roma

Where there is a will, there is a way.
 
Maxima Valeria Messallina
Sacerdos Vestalis


--- On Sat, 6/20/09, Maior <rory12001@...> wrote:

From: Maior <rory12001@...>
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Colonia Nova Roma
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Date: Saturday, June 20, 2009, 2:58 PM

M. Hortensia A.Tullia spd;
actually Quadratus has some land and says he has the know-how to put up earth bulidings and pour Roman concrete. So it's not a pipe dream at all. If we can organize. We'd have a permanent base for our Conventus as well.
bene vale
Maior
> >
> >
> > Salvete;
> > I know we have a colonia list, for those interested in founding a NR colony.
> > But we should talk about it here on the ML. Andy his critique said this was
> > impossible. And I disagree. If we have the will and the citizens we can do it.
> >
> > ATS: And I also disagree.
> >
> > Quadratus wrote the post below. We've been talking on the NRcolonia list, I
> > and Livia and I daresay Scholastica would agree; see our colonia
> > self-supporting by giving spoken Latin sessions, like summer school in a Roman
> > environment.
> >
> > ATS: That would be part of the package, along with sales of crafts and
> > produce, tours, etc.
> >
> > Quadratus, where are you talking about? the U.S. I presume. Is the land near
> > anything? A town, nightlife... Being off the grid and making our own
> > electricity and having our own well is excellent.
> >
> > ATS: Utilities and some other factors were considerations in our earlier
> > investigations. A lot of us don¹t need nightlife of that sort, but the
> > proximity of supermarkets and something resembling pharmacies and clothing
> > stores, to say nothing of medical facilities, is of considerable importance.
> > So, too, is that of related sites to draw tourists. Unfortunately, most of us
> > are busy, some of us live in areas where travel is inadvisable in winter, and
> > none of us appears to be wealthy, so we have not been able to do much more
> > than discuss qualities desirable in a prospective piece of land. We would
> > have to have multiple colonies, not just one, but at least one in Europe and
> > one in the Americas. One has to consider the language issue as well as
> > everything else, especially in Europe; on this side of the pond, there are
> > essentially four official languages (English, French, Spanish, and Portuguese,
> > two of which are more or less geographically restricted), whereas there are
> > many in Europe, and several are little-known outside of their immediate
> > vicinity, whereas three of the four languages in the Americas are well known.
> > It is daunting enough to travel in lands where one does not know the language;
> > living there is another, and far more challenging, situation, especially when
> > one has to start from scratch rather than stay in an existing dwelling. I
> > don¹t think that the European Union has gotten around to adopting our language
> > as universal just yet, and do not expect that shopkeepers or real estate
> > agents in, say, Bulgaria, speak Latin. Maybe Finland; there are lots of fine
> > Latinists there...
> >
> >
> > I'm learning right now to grow vegetables for home consumption, (the gourmet
> > kind).
> >
> > ATS: Good! The ordinary ones are useful, too...even more so.
> >
> >
> > So this is my skill. And I'm studying latin and just finished Sermo II.
> >
> >
> > ATS: Not just yet, young lady: Avitus just returned and has given us a
> > number of posts to answer, and one of these days will provide the information
> > I need to correct the Sermo II finals, which will then be sent to him for
> > review. Assuming you pass, then, and only then, will you be liberated
> > fully...and in the mean time I have to nag the Sermo I and Grammatica II
> > students to return their exams as well as correct the GL II exams as they come
> > in.
> >
> > bene vale
> > M. Horensia Maior
> >
> > Vale, et valete.
> >
> >
> >
> > My main idea is that Nova Roma start forming some serious physical wealth. I
> > don't want to see it crash. As for land, well raw land was what I had in mind.
> > I have access to auctions that would allow us to purchase land at around 300
> > or
> > less for around an acre or more as the down payment. Monthly fees of 50 to 200
> > dollars would be required to pay off the land entirely. Since Nova Roma would
> > be buying the land it would be tax exempt and Nova Roma would not need to pay
> > land tax. Since it is raw land, Nova Roma can issue the building of a Roman
> > city from the ground up. Also should Nova Roma decide to hire some workers,
> > the
> > work paid would also be tax exempt and refunded at the end of the Fiscal year.
> > So Nova Roma would not be taking any major expenses out of their budget. If I
> > have to pay for this myself then so be it. I can afford the down payment and
> > subsequent payments there after. I would just need to transition my business
> > from physically based to internet based I suppose.
> >
> > I have some friends who use to work for Micron still have their factory to
> > make
> > solar cells. Using wind turbines and the solar cells I can get for dirt cheap,
> > the main office of Nova Roma could be state of the art, or all the houses
> > could
> > be powered independantly and Nova Roma would not have to worry about
> > electrical
> > costs. On top of that, if we choose the right land to buy we can build a well
> > and put a septic tank in the land. Doing so would allow Nova Roma to have its
> > own water and thus avoid water bills. So if Nova Roma wants to get serious,
> > I'll get serious and we can find a way so that Nova Roma will not have to pay
> > land tax, electric bill, or a water bill and only have to focus on getting
> > customers and paying off the land. I'm ready when they are. Well that's not
> > true, I would need to transition my work over to be able to support me without
> > being physical. So in a couple of months I'm ready...in theory.
> >
> >
> >
>




No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 8.5.339 / Virus Database: 270.12.81/2189 - Release Date: 06/20/09 06:15:00

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67610 From: Aqvillivs Rota Date: 2009-06-20
Subject: Re: Colonia Nova Roma
Salvete Omnes,
 
Is the Colonia List public?
 
Is it possible to get a copy of this list ?
 
C. Aqvillivs Rota
 


From: A. Tullia Scholastica <fororom@...>
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Saturday, June 20, 2009 5:45:22 PM
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Colonia Nova Roma


  
A. Tullia Scholastica M. Hortensiae Majori quiritibus, sociis, peregrinisque bonae voluntatis S.P.D.
  

Salvete;
 I know we have a colonia list, for those interested in founding a NR colony.. But we should talk about it here on the ML. Andy his critique said this was impossible. And I disagree. If we have the will and the citizens we can do it.

    ATS:  And I also disagree.  

Quadratus wrote the post below. We've been talking on the NRcolonia list, I and Livia and I daresay Scholastica would agree; see our colonia self-supporting by giving spoken Latin sessions, like summer school in a Roman environment.

    ATS:  That would be part of the package, along with sales of crafts and produce, tours, etc.

Quadratus, where are you talking about? the U.S. I presume. Is the land near anything? A town, nightlife... Being off the grid and making our own electricity and having our own well is excellent.

    ATS:  Utilities and some other factors were considerations in our earlier investigations.   A lot of us don’t need nightlife of that sort, but the proximity of supermarkets and something resembling pharmacies and clothing stores, to say nothing of medical facilities, is of considerable importance.  So, too, is that of related sites to draw tourists.  Unfortunately, most of us are busy, some of us live in areas where travel is inadvisable in winter, and none of us appears to be wealthy, so we have not been able to do much more than discuss qualities desirable in a prospective piece of land.  We would have to have multiple colonies, not just one, but at least one in Europe and one in the Americas.  One has to consider the language issue as well as everything else, especially in Europe; on this side of the pond, there are essentially four official languages (English, French, Spanish, and Portuguese, two of which are more or less geographically restricted), whereas there are many in Europe, and several are little-known outside of their immediate vicinity, whereas three of the four languages in the Americas are well known.  It is daunting enough to travel in lands where one does not know the language; living there is another, and far more challenging, situation, especially when one has to start from scratch rather than stay in an existing dwelling.  I don’t think that the European Union has gotten around to adopting our language as universal just yet, and do not expect that shopkeepers or real estate agents in, say, Bulgaria, speak Latin.  Maybe Finland; there are lots of fine Latinists there...


I'm learning right now to grow vegetables for home consumption, (the gourmet kind).

    ATS:  Good!  The ordinary ones are useful, too...even more so.  


So this is my skill. And I'm studying latin and just finished Sermo II.


    ATS:  Not just yet, young lady:  Avitus just returned and has given us a number of posts to answer, and one of these days will provide the information I need to correct the Sermo II finals, which will then be sent to him for review.  Assuming you pass, then, and only then, will you be liberated fully...and in the mean time I have to nag the Sermo I and Grammatica II students to return their exams as well as correct the GL II exams as they come in.  

 bene vale
 M. Horensia Maior

Vale, et valete.  



My main idea is that Nova Roma start forming some serious physical wealth. I
don't want to see it crash. As for land, well raw land was what I had in mind.
I have access to auctions that would allow us to purchase land at around 300 or
less for around an acre or more as the down payment. Monthly fees of 50 to 200
dollars would be required to pay off the land entirely. Since Nova Roma would
be buying the land it would be tax exempt and Nova Roma would not need to pay
land tax. Since it is raw land, Nova Roma can issue the building of a Roman
city from the ground up. Also should Nova Roma decide to hire some workers, the
work paid would also be tax exempt and refunded at the end of the Fiscal year.
So Nova Roma would not be taking any major expenses out of their budget. If I
have to pay for this myself then so be it. I can afford the down payment and
subsequent payments there after. I would just need to transition my business
from physically based to internet based I suppose.

I have some friends who use to work for Micron still have their factory to make
solar cells. Using wind turbines and the solar cells I can get for dirt cheap,
the main office of Nova Roma could be state of the art, or all the houses could
be powered independantly and Nova Roma would not have to worry about electrical
costs. On top of that, if we choose the right land to buy we can build a well
and put a septic tank in the land. Doing so would allow Nova Roma to have its
own water and thus avoid water bills. So if Nova Roma wants to get serious,
I'll get serious and we can find a way so that Nova Roma will not have to pay
land tax, electric bill, or a water bill and only have to focus on getting
customers and paying off the land. I'm ready when they are. Well that's not
true, I would need to transition my work over to be able to support me without
being physical. So in a couple of months I'm ready...in theory.

  
    


Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67611 From: n_apollonius_quadratus Date: 2009-06-20
Subject: Re: Regrets
N. Apollonius Quadratus Dianae Aventinae salutem plurimam dicit.

Though it really isn't my place to comment on this sort of matter as I wasn't involved, I would just like to say you deserve nothing. You feel bad, okay. You regret what you said, okay. Keep torturing yourself and you pay your penance? Hardly. Instead let your penance be striving to do good. We all make mistakes, and should we be held accountable for all of them? Should we replay the penance of past crimes for ever? Instead I say you have seen your error, and are ready to do good. Then do good. By the merit of your works will the harm of what you did be undone. If the Vestal Virgin cannot forgive that, then that is their deal, but you have moved on and have paid said crime with equal good. Just remember, Dianae, you are not a bad person. You are a person who did a bad thing. That doesn't make you terrible. Do good, and be a person who does good. That's all there is to it. I look forward to the wonders you will now create, Dianae.

Vale.

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Diana Octavia Aventina" <roman.babe@...> wrote:
>
> Salvete all (and especially our Vestal virgin),
>
> You know, I've said a lot of rude things to people over the years, and there
> is only one thing that keeps replaying over and over in my mind that I
> really really regret- and those were the horribly rude comments that I made
> about our Vestal virgin in the BA. I won't repeat them, because I cringe
> everytime I think of them. Someone hit the nail on the head when they said
> that I made those comments just as I would have made a comment about a
> catholic priest. I didn't think of a person as a Vestal virgin. I just
> spontaneously and stupidly wrote 2 nasty things in a row. Then once I saw
> that our Vestal virgin was upset, it hit me that I was actually commented
> rudely about a real flesh and blood woman whom I always liked and who was
> always very sweet to me.. Then the reality set in and I thought "What kind
> of diarhea has been flowing out of my mouth for the last few years?". I
> would never ever say anything so hurtful in real life to anyone. In fact, I
> always go out of my way to say nice things to people....
>
> So once again I am extremely & very much sorry for saying those horrible
> things about a lady who did not deserve it. My 'penance' is that I keep
> replaying it over and over in my head and feel totally embarrassed and
> guilty each time.. I deserve to feel horrible about this.
> Valete,
> Diana
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67612 From: n_apollonius_quadratus Date: 2009-06-20
Subject: Re: Digest Number 4586 - Some observations from the peanut gallery
N. Apollonius Quadratus Andy omnibusque salvete.

In general, this doesn't excuse the fact that Modianus is legally Censor. There is no legal loophole as it establishes a chronological impossibility if the service was to include consecutive as a basis for refusal to allow the candidate. The law is poorly written, and much posturing as of late is done to preform deeds I find unsavory. A part from that, yes there is far less Romanesque things being talked about as of late. So I think my next post to the ML will be Roman related. Hm.

Valete.

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "livia_plauta" <livia.plauta@...> wrote:
>
> Salve Andy,
> I wish some of the people here would take your advice. Unfortunately their aim seems to be to drive constructive people like you away. I seems they succeed in 95% of the cases.
> Then they complai because NR has few assidui.
>
> Vale
> Livia
>
> > potential benefits involved. Like Roman politics that much? Stop by a hobby shop, Reiner Knizia's game "Quo Vadis" and invite some friends over
> > for an evening of politicking and wine. You'll have more fun.
> >
> > Let's face it - if this were the real Roman Republic and/or people wanted to really resolve the recent NR problems "in the Roman way", one or both factions
> > would head down to the local gladiatorial school with a sack of denarii, hire a pack of goons and waylay their opponents on the road to Praeneste. Anyone
> > familiar with the Gracchi brothers, Sullan proscriptions, Catilinian conspiracy or the civil wars knows this. So, when one or the other side lays claim to
> > doing things "in the Roman way", let's face it this is a more civilized age and noone here is doing things as the Romans themselves would have.
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67613 From: n_apollonius_quadratus Date: 2009-06-20
Subject: Re: Colonia Nova Roma
N. Apollonius Quadratus M. Maior salutem plurimam dicit.

The land I was considering was in the US. Most of them are rather far from any major city (I was looking at price), but I feel this wouldn't cause too much of a problem. As it would give the overall feel of being transported to another place as you begin to approach the hallowed lands of Nova Roma's colony. However, most of the lands are a thirty minute drive from the nearest major city. These lands are raw land and several acres in size. I have pictures of two of the plots I am considering purchasing.

Maior and I were conversing on Yahoo messenger, and Maior asked I post this here. If land is not an issue, then building the colony is already done we just need to know where it is going to be. I know how to build Roman Cement, and modified Roman concrete should we need to do it. If we have ten workers we can build at least three major buildings before the day is done. If we have the fortitude to really bust our gut on it, we can produce five major buildings. Producing a house is far easier and would take under half a day to produce several living areas for people. The only thing I am concerned about is plumbing. I don't care how ahistorical a flushing toilet is, I want a septic tank, and that's final. I have a friend who will print solar panels for us if we need to. So those are free solar panels that I will do out of my own pocket. The only thing we really need is land, manpower and that septic tank. On my next reply to this, I'll get an itemized list of what we need and the costs pertaining to it. That should help.


--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Maior" <rory12001@...> wrote:
>
> Salvete;
> I know we have a colonia list, for those interested in founding a NR colony. But we should talk about it here on the ML. Andy his critique said this was impossible. And I disagree. If we have the will and the citizens we can do it.
>
> Quadratus wrote the post below. We've been talking on the NRcolonia list, I and Livia and I daresay Scholastica would agree; see our colonia self-supporting by giving spoken Latin sessions, like summer school in a Roman environment.
>
> Quadratus, where are you talking about? the U.S. I presume. Is the land near anything? A town, nightlife...Being off the grid and making our own electricity and having our own well is excellent. I'm learning right now to grow vegetables for home consumption, (the gourmet kind). So this is my skill. And I'm studying latin and just finished Sermo II.
> bene vale
> M. Horensia Maior
>
>
>
> My main idea is that Nova Roma start forming some serious physical wealth. I
> don't want to see it crash. As for land, well raw land was what I had in mind.
> I have access to auctions that would allow us to purchase land at around 300 or
> less for around an acre or more as the down payment. Monthly fees of 50 to 200
> dollars would be required to pay off the land entirely. Since Nova Roma would
> be buying the land it would be tax exempt and Nova Roma would not need to pay
> land tax. Since it is raw land, Nova Roma can issue the building of a Roman
> city from the ground up. Also should Nova Roma decide to hire some workers, the
> work paid would also be tax exempt and refunded at the end of the Fiscal year.
> So Nova Roma would not be taking any major expenses out of their budget. If I
> have to pay for this myself then so be it. I can afford the down payment and
> subsequent payments there after. I would just need to transition my business
> from physically based to internet based I suppose.
>
> I have some friends who use to work for Micron still have their factory to make
> solar cells. Using wind turbines and the solar cells I can get for dirt cheap,
> the main office of Nova Roma could be state of the art, or all the houses could
> be powered independantly and Nova Roma would not have to worry about electrical
> costs. On top of that, if we choose the right land to buy we can build a well
> and put a septic tank in the land. Doing so would allow Nova Roma to have its
> own water and thus avoid water bills. So if Nova Roma wants to get serious,
> I'll get serious and we can find a way so that Nova Roma will not have to pay
> land tax, electric bill, or a water bill and only have to focus on getting
> customers and paying off the land. I'm ready when they are. Well that's not
> true, I would need to transition my work over to be able to support me without
> being physical. So in a couple of months I'm ready...in theory.
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67614 From: Q. Valerius Poplicola Date: 2009-06-20
Subject: Re: nova roma is syncretic
Poplicola Maiori:

>> the Romans during the Republic did not have the concept of religious heretics.

This charge is fallacious. Romans, like their Greek counterparts, were concerned with religious taboos and customs just as much as the Christians are with belief. Several points:

Socrates was killed for atheism;
Philosophers and Jews have both been expelled from Rome;
the Bacchus cult was repressed;
Lutatius Cerco was forbidden by the Senate from consulting the oracle of Fortuna at Praeneste - auspices had to be taken inside Rome.

This is one point where you and I disagree over religion. One's personal, family cult is there own business, but it's outright false to suggest that the ancient had no concept of "heresy".

Vale.

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Maior" <rory12001@...> wrote:
>
> -Salvete;
> I was speaking of all culti,Judaism, Zoroastrianism, Isis worshippers, Pythagoreans.
>
> the Romans during the Republic did not have the concept of religious heretics. During the Empire up to Constantine, which the religio here in Nova Roma follows, there wasn't such a concept. There are no heresies and no heretics in Nova Roma.
>
> It is alien to our culture, to the tolerant syncretic place Nova Roma is.
>
> Anyone who calls himself or herself a Christian, is one; gnostic christians, rc christians, orthodox christians, universalists are all equal here. The same if cives worship Isis, Yahweh, Odin, also atheists agnostics, philosophers!
>
> We have the state cultus deorum but for everything else:
>
> All are equal in Nova Roma! We are a liberal tolerant syncretic polytheistic organization.
> valete
> M.Hortensia Maior
>
>
> > Salvete.
> >
> > An incorrect depiction has, once again, been given of my private cultus. "[D]uring the republic" there was no such thing as Christianity, as Christ had yet to be born; long before the end of the Western Empire Christianity had formulated itself in contrast to many various and sundry heresies - among them, Gnosticism.
> >
> > Valete,
> >
> > Cato
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67615 From: n_apollonius_quadratus Date: 2009-06-20
Subject: Re: Some questions now that I have peace of mind...
N. Apollonius Quadratus Liviae Plautae salutem plurimam dicit.

You are welcome for the information, oh Copper clay spokes lady. Sounds like you have a new friend in the metal department. And yes after firing it is real metal and works just like real metal. It is metal is all it's glorious fashion.

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "livia_plauta" <livia.plauta@...> wrote:
>
> Livia Apollonio sal.
>
> Thanks a lot for the information on silver clay!
> I found that it's solt in Italy, as bronze and copper clay too. I calculated that bronze clay is actually cheaper than fusion in sylicone moulds. This means new possibilities for my reproductions of roman objects!
>
> I'll try to get it, and see if it can be worked in moulds like clay. In that case series production should be possible. If I had know it existed, it would have saved me a lot of trouble when designing a ring for italian NR members. I had to smelt lead and work it to make the prototype.
>
> Also, it could solve the problem of how to make hollow bronze objects. I guess making a bronze oil lamp is no longer an unreachable goal. And the best part is that the metal can be worked as normal metal when it's hardened!
>
> Optime vale,
> Livia
>
> >
> > N. Apollonius Quadratus Maior et Liviae salutem plurimam dicit.
> >
> > Thank you for the links. Sounds like I just need to get off my lazy roman butt and get to work. As for silver clay... PMC was invented by the Mitsubishi company and sold in electrostatic sealed bags. The metal itself is micro particles bonded via organic polymers. When heated to the right temperature via kiln or blowtorch, the organic binding ignites and burns away. What is left is a pure silver (.999) trinket of whatever it was you made. The organic polymers allow for molding like clay. The PMC line consists of Copper, Brass, Silver, and Gold, with some talks of Platinum being in the works (not really likely I suspect).
> >
> > My main idea is that Nova Roma start forming some serious physical wealth. I don't want to see it crash. As for land, well raw land was what I had in mind. I have access to auctions that would allow us to purchase land at around 300 or less for around an acre or more as the down payment. Monthly fees of 50 to 200 dollars would be required to pay off the land entirely. Since Nova Roma would be buying the land it would be tax exempt and Nova Roma would not need to pay land tax. Since it is raw land, Nova Roma can issue the building of a Roman city from the ground up. Also should Nova Roma decide to hire some workers, the work paid would also be tax exempt and refunded at the end of the Fiscal year. So Nova Roma would not be taking any major expenses out of their budget. If I have to pay for this myself then so be it. I can afford the down payment and subsequent payments there after. I would just need to transition my business from physically based to internet based I suppose.
> >
> > I have some friends who use to work for Micron still have their factory to make solar cells. Using wind turbines and the solar cells I can get for dirt cheap, the main office of Nova Roma could be state of the art, or all the houses could be powered independantly and Nova Roma would not have to worry about electrical costs. On top of that, if we choose the right land to buy we can build a well and put a septic tank in the land. Doing so would allow Nova Roma to have its own water and thus avoid water bills. So if Nova Roma wants to get serious, I'll get serious and we can find a way so that Nova Roma will not have to pay land tax, electric bill, or a water bill and only have to focus on getting customers and paying off the land. I'm ready when they are. Well that's not true, I would need to transition my work over to be able to support me without being physical. So in a couple of months I'm ready...in theory.
> >
> > Valete.
> >
> > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Maior" <rory12001@> wrote:
> > >
> > > Salve Apolloni;
> > > M. Lucretius Agricola our former webmaster, organized the coin minting group and is very keen on coins and minting them so do contact him.
> > >
> > > and I too am on the Coloniae Romanae list, I'd love to live part of the year as a Roman with other Romans.
> > >
> > > bene vale
> > > Maior
> > >
> > >
> > > > Salve Apolloni,
> > > > I forgot to mention that there's a group called Coloniae Romanae (http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Coloniae-Romanae/) all dedicated to projects like the one you mention of buildin a "roman " vacation resort. At the moment the list is very quiet. It seems that most people are interested in theory, but don't want to invest money themselves, and/or don't have the competences necessary for starting a project of this scope.
> > > >
> > > > I'm currently in Bulgaria, and here the prices wouldn't be impossible. I've seen an ad for a 5-room stone house for sale for 15 thousand euros. The only problem is that it's 68 Kms from the seaside. Land is to be had cheaply too (but more expensive as one approaches the seaside), and probably because of the cheap labour it could make sense to start such a project here.
> > > >
> > > > Optime vale,
> > > > Livia
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > Omnibus Salvete
> > > > >
> > > > > I've been trying to get into Nova Roma IRC for sometime now, and I am using Firefox 3, and I am using chatzilla? It's the IRC plug in for Firefox. Every time I try to connect, it says either refused or timed out. Now I changed my name over to N_Apollonius_Quadratus, so that shouldn't be an issue. I turned on and off my fire wall to see if that was an issue, and it wasn't. Is there something I'm missing?
> > > > >
> > > > > Also, what does it cost the government to print the Nova Roma coins? I like that there is coinage being produced, but they are brass. Nothing wrong with brass, but let's give Nova Roma a little kick in the tail. Now if Nova Roma doesn't have Tax Exempt status it sure needs to get it fast. That way authorized members of Nova Roma can go out and purchase PMC (precious metal clay). This clay is .999 pure silver. Well if you get the silver. The gold is a little hefty and getting copper isn't a bad idea. Since the authorized individual purchased the clay for Nova Roma, then Nova Roma owns that clay. This is a tax write off and will be refunded at the next tax returns. The silver is classified as basic operating expenses as the silver will be minted in Nova Roma fashion. Now Nova Roma has some serious pulling weight. Real silver coins to give buying power to the Ordo Equestor, and the Copper coinage would also bring more buying power. Now instead of blank fiat money polluting Nova Roma, we have actual real wealth on which to pull from. Not only that, but should the silver market rise, so too will Nova Roma's wealth. If every citizen of Nova Roma purchased one box of PMC and donated it to Nova Roma, and Nova Roma purchased some PMC for itself, then Nova Roma will begin to have some serious wealth being developed that will not depreciate. The people who donated the PMC will be able to declare the silver as a donation and be refunded for the cost of the PMC. Realistically the cost of PMC is higher than the cost of silver as it stands, but the cost isn't a factor as the expense is refunded since it was a donation.
> > > > >
> > > > > What is Nova Roma doing about expansion? If Nova Roma is not a tax exempt organization it needs to be quickly. As such puting down payments on land would place Nova Roma as the sole owner of that land, and there would be no land tax and the cost of purchasing that land would be refunded. On top of that, Nova Roma can take care of other costs by building on the land making it a sort of vacation spot for people to live an "authentic" Roman lifestyle. There are all sorts of quirky places like that riddling the US and other places as well. In Finland there was an Inn for some time that you could live as a Viking. I mean Santa Claus is in Finland for goodness sake. If we used the ram earth technique to build the houses and other such buildings, we can save on costs for construction. We would also be minimally impacting the environment. If a garden for farming was established then the land could become autonomous and eventually turn into a commune where Nova Roman citizens could actually live in the lifestyle they desired. As a Temple to the Roman Gods became established on the land more people would flock to it for it's Pagan connotations. Nova Roma would expand, gaining more wealth for itself, it would spread the word of Nova Roma as people go there to escape mundane life and explore a more "holistic" way of life, in turn this money collected from travelers would go into the Nova Roman pockets where partial investment in precious metals like silver and gold solidify the wealth of Nova Roma. As the construction of the Temple becomes complete the transition from tourist destination begins to change into a commune that is self sufficient and capable of housing Nova Roman citizens. This all while Nova Roma purchases new land to continue the cycle of tourist then commune. Has this ever been considered by Nova Roman officials? What steps are there to further the goal of physical manifestation of our place in this world? Meetings are fine and all, but a central hub where Nova Romans can gather and LIVE in the lifestyle we choose, what is being to done to carry this out?
> > > > >
> > > > > Also, is there going to be a meet up in the US or isn't there? I've been trying to pay attention.
> > > > >
> > > > > And is it okay to have a tunic but not a toga?
> > > > >
> > > > > What is the proper way to address members of the Senate and other such Magistrates?
> > > > >
> > > > > And how come I haven't been assigned to my tribe yet?
> > > > >
> > > > > These and other questions should probably stay in my head. Until next time...
> > > > >
> > > > > Valete.
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67616 From: Q. Valerius Poplicola Date: 2009-06-20
Subject: Re: nova roma is syncretic
Only if said reconstructionist organization abandons its reconstructionist principles.

Poplicola

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, David Kling <tau.athanasios@...> wrote:
>
> Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus Gaio Equitio Catoni salutem dicit
>
> The difference between Gnosticism and Orthodox Christianity (or say Judaism)
> is that I can be a member of a (Pagan) Roman reconstructionist organization
> without any reservations -- in conscious, spiritually, or in any other way.
>
> Vale;
>
> Modianus
>
> On Sat, Jun 20, 2009 at 3:12 PM, Gaius Equitius Cato <catoinnyc@...>wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > Cato omnibus in foro SPD
> >
> > Salvete.
> >
> > An incorrect depiction has, once again, been given of my private cultus.
> > "[D]uring the republic" there was no such thing as Christianity, as Christ
> > had yet to be born; long before the end of the Western Empire Christianity
> > had formulated itself in contrast to many various and sundry heresies -
> > among them, Gnosticism.
> >
> > Valete,
> >
> > Cato
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67617 From: L Julia Aquila Date: 2009-06-20
Subject: Re: Colonia Nova Roma
Salve Rota amici!

I sent you a link~

Vale,
Julia


--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Aqvillivs Rota <c.aqvillivs_rota@...> wrote:
>
> Salvete Omnes,
>
> Is the Colonia List public?
>
> Is it possible to get a copy of this list ?
>
> C. Aqvillivs Rota
>  
>
>
>
>
> ________________________________
> From: A. Tullia Scholastica <fororom@...>
> To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Saturday, June 20, 2009 5:45:22 PM
> Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Colonia Nova Roma
>
>
>
>
>
>
>   
> A. Tullia Scholastica M. Hortensiae Majori quiritibus, sociis, peregrinisque bonae voluntatis S.P.D.
>   
>
> Salvete;
>  I know we have a colonia list, for those interested in founding a NR colony. But we should talk about it here on the ML. Andy his critique said this was impossible. And I disagree. If we have the will and the citizens we can do it.
>
>     ATS:  And I also disagree.  
>
> Quadratus wrote the post below. We've been talking on the NRcolonia list, I and Livia and I daresay Scholastica would agree; see our colonia self-supporting by giving spoken Latin sessions, like summer school in a Roman environment.
>
>     ATS:  That would be part of the package, along with sales of crafts and produce, tours, etc.
>
> Quadratus, where are you talking about? the U.S. I presume. Is the land near anything? A town, nightlife... Being off the grid and making our own electricity and having our own well is excellent.
>
>     ATS:  Utilities and some other factors were considerations in our earlier investigations.   A lot of us don’t need nightlife of that sort, but the proximity of supermarkets and something resembling pharmacies and clothing stores, to say nothing of medical facilities, is of considerable importance.  So, too, is that of related sites to draw tourists.  Unfortunately, most of us are busy, some of us live in areas where travel is inadvisable in winter, and none of us appears to be wealthy, so we have not been able to do much more than discuss qualities desirable in a prospective piece of land.  We would have to have multiple colonies, not just one, but at least one in Europe and one in the Americas.  One has to consider the language issue as well as everything else, especially in Europe; on this side of the pond, there are essentially four official languages (English, French, Spanish, and Portuguese, two of which are more or less
> geographically restricted), whereas there are many in Europe, and several are little-known outside of their immediate vicinity, whereas three of the four languages in the Americas are well known.  It is daunting enough to travel in lands where one does not know the language; living there is another, and far more challenging, situation, especially when one has to start from scratch rather than stay in an existing dwelling.  I don’t think that the European Union has gotten around to adopting our language as universal just yet, and do not expect that shopkeepers or real estate agents in, say, Bulgaria, speak Latin.  Maybe Finland; there are lots of fine Latinists there...
>
>
> I'm learning right now to grow vegetables for home consumption, (the gourmet kind).
>
>     ATS:  Good!  The ordinary ones are useful, too...even more so.  
>
>
> So this is my skill. And I'm studying latin and just finished Sermo II.
>
>
>     ATS:  Not just yet, young lady:  Avitus just returned and has given us a number of posts to answer, and one of these days will provide the information I need to correct the Sermo II finals, which will then be sent to him for review.  Assuming you pass, then, and only then, will you be liberated fully...and in the mean time I have to nag the Sermo I and Grammatica II students to return their exams as well as correct the GL II exams as they come in.  
>
>  bene vale
>  M. Horensia Maior
>
> Vale, et valete.  
>
>
>
> My main idea is that Nova Roma start forming some serious physical wealth. I
> don't want to see it crash. As for land, well raw land was what I had in mind.
> I have access to auctions that would allow us to purchase land at around 300 or
> less for around an acre or more as the down payment. Monthly fees of 50 to 200
> dollars would be required to pay off the land entirely. Since Nova Roma would
> be buying the land it would be tax exempt and Nova Roma would not need to pay
> land tax. Since it is raw land, Nova Roma can issue the building of a Roman
> city from the ground up. Also should Nova Roma decide to hire some workers, the
> work paid would also be tax exempt and refunded at the end of the Fiscal year.
> So Nova Roma would not be taking any major expenses out of their budget. If I
> have to pay for this myself then so be it. I can afford the down payment and
> subsequent payments there after. I would just need to transition my business
> from physically based to internet based I suppose.
>
> I have some friends who use to work for Micron still have their factory to make
> solar cells. Using wind turbines and the solar cells I can get for dirt cheap,
> the main office of Nova Roma could be state of the art, or all the houses could
> be powered independantly and Nova Roma would not have to worry about electrical
> costs. On top of that, if we choose the right land to buy we can build a well
> and put a septic tank in the land. Doing so would allow Nova Roma to have its
> own water and thus avoid water bills. So if Nova Roma wants to get serious,
> I'll get serious and we can find a way so that Nova Roma will not have to pay
> land tax, electric bill, or a water bill and only have to focus on getting
> customers and paying off the land. I'm ready when they are. Well that's not
> true, I would need to transition my work over to be able to support me without
> being physical. So in a couple of months I'm ready...in theory.
>
>   
>     
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67618 From: gualterus_graecus Date: 2009-06-20
Subject: Re: nova roma is syncretic
Salve Cato,

Yes, I noticed that before too (re the 330 material). It seems to have been added by Agricola a while ago, back on Feb 25, 2007. It should be corrected to be consistent with the text of the Constitution's preamble.

Vale,

Gualterus

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Gaius Equitius Cato" <catoinnyc@...> wrote:
>
> Cato Sempronio Regulo sal.
>
> Salve.
>
> I believe the Jews were thrown out of at least the City of Rome several times as well.
>
> Also, here in the Respblica we contain within our own time frame everything up to the removal of the Altar of Victory from the Senate, I believe, which post-dates Constantine the Great by about a century.
>
> Curiously, our opening remarks on the wiki site have been changed, so thatthey now read (in incredibly ungrammatical fashion):
>
> "From its founding to 330 CE, when it ceased to be the center of Imperial authority, Rome laid the foundation for our modern Western civilization."
>
> Thank goodness our Constitution has not been so vandalized, and it reads:
>
> "...defined as the period from the founding of the City of Rome in 753 BCE to the removal of the altar of Victory from the Senate in 394 CE..."
>
> I do not know who changed the wording of our opening statement or why, but would be interested in knowing. Can we find out when and who and why this was altered to read this way?
>
> Vale,
>
> Cato
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "A. Sempronius Regulus" <asempronius.regulus@> wrote:
> >
> > Salve,
> >  
> > I wouldn't say in ancient Rome all religions were equal. First, foreign deities and cults did not have templum augurially aligned to the heavens for their cella. They just an a surveyed piece of land or fanum. Second, cults that did not recognize the state cult or public cult were not tolerated. Third, cults that appeared to threaten the state were suppressed. The philosophers were thrown out of Rome at one point and Bacchus-Dionysos had issues with the Senate. Basically, cults that did not challenge the public cult of the state were tolerated.
> >  
> > Vale,
> > A. Sempronius Regulus
> >  
> >  
> >
> > --- On Sat, 6/20/09, Maior <rory12001@> wrote:
> >
> >
> > From: Maior <rory12001@>
> > Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: nova roma is syncretic
> > To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> > Date: Saturday, June 20, 2009, 7:41 PM
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > -Salvete;
> > I was speaking of all culti,Judaism, Zoroastrianism, Isis worshippers, Pythagoreans.
> >
> > the Romans during the Republic did not have the concept of religious heretics. During the Empire up to Constantine, which the religio here in Nova Roma follows, there wasn't such a concept. There are no heresies and no heretics in Nova Roma.
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67619 From: QFabiusMaxmi@aol.com Date: 2009-06-20
Subject: Re: Digest Number 4586 - Some observations from the peanut ga...
In a message dated 6/20/2009 1:56:56 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time, livia.plauta@... writes:
Let's face it - if this were the real Roman Republic and/or people wanted to really resolve the recent NR problems "in the Roman way", one or both factions
> would head down to the local gladiatorial school with a sack of denarii, hire a pack of goons and waylay their opponents on the road to Praeneste. Anyone
> familiar with the Gracchi brothers, Sullan proscriptions, Catilinian conspiracy or the civil wars knows this. So, when one or the other side lays claim to
> doing things "in the Roman way", let's face it this is a more civilized age and noone here is doing things as the Romans themselves would have.
 
Andy, you are so right.  But we can't do that can we?  So instead we fall back on the Law.  Granted it is not as quick, but it is very Roman. 
 
Fabius
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67620 From: Steve Moore Date: 2009-06-20
Subject: Re: Digest Number 4586 - Some observations from the peanut gallery

M. Valerius Potitus N. Apollonio Quadrato SPD.

 

Modianus is not legally censor, and this has been clearly explained by Cn., Iulius Caesar.

 

Furthermore, the talking point that this law is poorly written does not excuse breaking the law’s clear intent.

 

If you wonder what the clear intent is, please read the archives.

 

Vale.

 


From: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com [mailto: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com ] On Behalf Of n_apollonius_quadratus
Sent: Saturday, June 20, 2009 3:14 PM
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Digest Number 4586 - Some observations from the peanut gallery

 




N. Apollonius Quadratus Andy omnibusque salvete.

In general, this doesn't excuse the fact that Modianus is legally Censor. There is no legal loophole as it establishes a chronological impossibility if the service was to include consecutive as a basis for refusal to allow the candidate. The law is poorly written, and much posturing as of late is done to preform deeds I find unsavory. A part from that, yes there is far less Romanesque things being talked about as of late. So I think my next post to the ML will be Roman related. Hm.

Valete.

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com, "livia_plauta" <

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67621 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2009-06-20
Subject: Witness
I, Lucius Cornelius Sulla Felix, Lictor of Nova Roma, hereby witness the appointment
of L. Coruncanius Cato as Aedilis Curulis of Nova Roma.

As a member of the Comitia Curiata I wish L. Coruncanius Cato good luck in this
office and in his work for the Res Publica.

Vale,

Lucius Cornelius Sulla Felix
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67622 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2009-06-20
Subject: Re: Protecting Our Votes and Future Elections
Cato omnibus in foro SPD

Salvete.

Again, I challenge anyone to show me a single post in which I have advocated or practiced misogyny.

It is these kinds of throwaway comments that do the most damage to Maior's last, tottering shreds of credibility.

This is at least the third time in as many months that she has lied about what I have said or done. For the praetors who showed such deep concern over factual errors and misconceptions, Maior certainly has had an incredibly free hand.

Valete,

Cato



--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Maior" <rory12001@...> wrote:
>
> Salve Valeria Messalina;
> it has been noted and not by a female either, that there is a distincly misogynistic tone used by some against the Nova Roman women who speak up. Sexist and dismissive. I've had those posts from Poplicola, Cato, Paulinus, just recently.
> It's rude and has no place in Nova Roma, and no sexism isn't 'mos'. I've heard that old argument done to death..
> bene vale
> Maior
>
>
>
> > Sir, I do not need your permission or your approval as to how I sign or do not sign my posts, thank you.
> >
> >
> > <<Learn how the game was played (politica games of power) use the tools the romans did; and learn to take those consequences the good and the bad.>>
> >  
> > In fact, I urge all the women of Nova Roma to speak their minds when they so feel the need to do so on any issue. Whether I agree with their views or not, I will always support the right of all Nova Roman women to speak up, Vestals included.
> >  
> > Maxima Valeria Messallina
> > Sacerdos Vestalis
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67623 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2009-06-20
Subject: Re: nova roma is syncretic
Cato Gualtero Graeco sal.

Salve.

Interesting that the Pontifex Maximus and others advocated for a removal of the phrase protecting non-practitioners as magistrates and senators, and now the centuries that we embrace in our Constitution that include the period after the advent of my private cultus seem to have...gone missing...from the wiki page. Thank heavens the Constitution is not so easily manipulated.

Vale,

Cato



--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "gualterus_graecus" <waltms1@...> wrote:
>
>
> Salve Cato,
>
> Yes, I noticed that before too (re the 330 material). It seems to have been added by Agricola a while ago, back on Feb 25, 2007. It should be corrected to be consistent with the text of the Constitution's preamble.
>
> Vale,
>
> Gualterus
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Gaius Equitius Cato" <catoinnyc@> wrote:
> >
> > Cato Sempronio Regulo sal.
> >
> > Salve.
> >
> > I believe the Jews were thrown out of at least the City of Rome several times as well.
> >
> > Also, here in the Respblica we contain within our own time frame everything up to the removal of the Altar of Victory from the Senate, I believe, which post-dates Constantine the Great by about a century.
> >
> > Curiously, our opening remarks on the wiki site have been changed, so thatthey now read (in incredibly ungrammatical fashion):
> >
> > "From its founding to 330 CE, when it ceased to be the center of Imperial authority, Rome laid the foundation for our modern Western civilization."
> >
> > Thank goodness our Constitution has not been so vandalized, and it reads:
> >
> > "...defined as the period from the founding of the City of Rome in 753 BCE to the removal of the altar of Victory from the Senate in 394 CE..."
> >
> > I do not know who changed the wording of our opening statement or why, but would be interested in knowing. Can we find out when and who and why this was altered to read this way?
> >
> > Vale,
> >
> > Cato
> >
> > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "A. Sempronius Regulus" <asempronius.regulus@> wrote:
> > >
> > > Salve,
> > >  
> > > I wouldn't say in ancient Rome all religions were equal. First, foreign deities and cults did not have templum augurially aligned to the heavens for their cella. They just an a surveyed piece of land or fanum. Second, cults that did not recognize the state cult or public cult were not tolerated. Third, cults that appeared to threaten the state were suppressed. The philosophers were thrown out of Rome at one point and Bacchus-Dionysos had issues with the Senate. Basically, cults that did not challenge the public cult of the state were tolerated.
> > >  
> > > Vale,
> > > A. Sempronius Regulus
> > >  
> > >  
> > >
> > > --- On Sat, 6/20/09, Maior <rory12001@> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > From: Maior <rory12001@>
> > > Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: nova roma is syncretic
> > > To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> > > Date: Saturday, June 20, 2009, 7:41 PM
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > -Salvete;
> > > I was speaking of all culti,Judaism, Zoroastrianism, Isis worshippers, Pythagoreans.
> > >
> > > the Romans during the Republic did not have the concept of religious heretics. During the Empire up to Constantine, which the religio here in Nova Roma follows, there wasn't such a concept. There are no heresies and no heretics in Nova Roma.
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67624 From: Maior Date: 2009-06-20
Subject: Re: Colonia Nova Roma
Salvete;
and for everyone here is the link too;
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Coloniae-Romanae/

M. Hortensia Maior

- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "L Julia Aquila" <dis_pensible@...> wrote:
>
> Salve Rota amici!
>
> I sent you a link~
>
> Vale,
> Julia
>
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Aqvillivs Rota <c.aqvillivs_rota@> wrote:
> >
> > Salvete Omnes,
> >
> > Is the Colonia List public?
> >
> > Is it possible to get a copy of this list ?
> >
> > C. Aqvillivs Rota
> >  
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ________________________________
> > From: A. Tullia Scholastica <fororom@>
> > To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> > Sent: Saturday, June 20, 2009 5:45:22 PM
> > Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Colonia Nova Roma
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >   
> > A. Tullia Scholastica M. Hortensiae Majori quiritibus, sociis, peregrinisque bonae voluntatis S.P.D.
> >   
> >
> > Salvete;
> >  I know we have a colonia list, for those interested in founding a NR colony. But we should talk about it here on the ML. Andy his critique said this was impossible. And I disagree. If we have the will and the citizens we can do it.
> >
> >     ATS:  And I also disagree.  
> >
> > Quadratus wrote the post below. We've been talking on the NRcolonia list, I and Livia and I daresay Scholastica would agree; see our colonia self-supporting by giving spoken Latin sessions, like summer school in a Roman environment.
> >
> >     ATS:  That would be part of the package, along with sales of crafts and produce, tours, etc.
> >
> > Quadratus, where are you talking about? the U.S. I presume. Is the land near anything? A town, nightlife... Being off the grid and making our own electricity and having our own well is excellent.
> >
> >     ATS:  Utilities and some other factors were considerations in our earlier investigations.   A lot of us don’t need nightlife of that sort, but the proximity of supermarkets and something resembling pharmacies and clothing stores, to say nothing of medical facilities, is of considerable importance.  So, too, is that of related sites to draw tourists.  Unfortunately, most of us are busy, some of us live in areas where travel is inadvisable in winter, and none of us appears to be wealthy, so we have not been able to do much more than discuss qualities desirable in a prospective piece of land.  We would have to have multiple colonies, not just one, but at least one in Europe and one in the Americas.  One has to consider the language issue as well as everything else, especially in Europe; on this side of the pond, there are essentially four official languages (English, French, Spanish, and Portuguese, two of which are more or less
> > geographically restricted), whereas there are many in Europe, and several are little-known outside of their immediate vicinity, whereas three of the four languages in the Americas are well known.  It is daunting enough to travel in lands where one does not know the language; living there is another, and far more challenging, situation, especially when one has to start from scratch rather than stay in an existing dwelling.  I don’t think that the European Union has gotten around to adopting our language as universal just yet, and do not expect that shopkeepers or real estate agents in, say, Bulgaria, speak Latin.  Maybe Finland; there are lots of fine Latinists there...
> >
> >
> > I'm learning right now to grow vegetables for home consumption, (the gourmet kind).
> >
> >     ATS:  Good!  The ordinary ones are useful, too...even more so.  
> >
> >
> > So this is my skill. And I'm studying latin and just finished Sermo II.
> >
> >
> >     ATS:  Not just yet, young lady:  Avitus just returned and has given us a number of posts to answer, and one of these days will provide the information I need to correct the Sermo II finals, which will then be sent to him for review.  Assuming you pass, then, and only then, will you be liberated fully...and in the mean time I have to nag the Sermo I and Grammatica II students to return their exams as well as correct the GL II exams as they come in.  
> >
> >  bene vale
> >  M. Horensia Maior
> >
> > Vale, et valete.  
> >
> >
> >
> > My main idea is that Nova Roma start forming some serious physical wealth. I
> > don't want to see it crash. As for land, well raw land was what I had in mind.
> > I have access to auctions that would allow us to purchase land at around 300 or
> > less for around an acre or more as the down payment. Monthly fees of 50 to 200
> > dollars would be required to pay off the land entirely. Since Nova Roma would
> > be buying the land it would be tax exempt and Nova Roma would not need to pay
> > land tax. Since it is raw land, Nova Roma can issue the building of a Roman
> > city from the ground up. Also should Nova Roma decide to hire some workers, the
> > work paid would also be tax exempt and refunded at the end of the Fiscal year.
> > So Nova Roma would not be taking any major expenses out of their budget. If I
> > have to pay for this myself then so be it. I can afford the down payment and
> > subsequent payments there after. I would just need to transition my business
> > from physically based to internet based I suppose.
> >
> > I have some friends who use to work for Micron still have their factory to make
> > solar cells. Using wind turbines and the solar cells I can get for dirt cheap,
> > the main office of Nova Roma could be state of the art, or all the houses could
> > be powered independantly and Nova Roma would not have to worry about electrical
> > costs. On top of that, if we choose the right land to buy we can build a well
> > and put a septic tank in the land. Doing so would allow Nova Roma to have its
> > own water and thus avoid water bills. So if Nova Roma wants to get serious,
> > I'll get serious and we can find a way so that Nova Roma will not have to pay
> > land tax, electric bill, or a water bill and only have to focus on getting
> > customers and paying off the land. I'm ready when they are. Well that's not
> > true, I would need to transition my work over to be able to support me without
> > being physical. So in a couple of months I'm ready...in theory.
> >
> >   
> >     
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67625 From: Q. Valerius Poplicola Date: 2009-06-20
Subject: Re: Digest Number 4586 - Some observations from the peanut gallery
Did you ever read my post correcting your factually incorrect information? I'm curious if you read that because I have not seen you yet respond, although I may have missed it.

Poplicola

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "n_apollonius_quadratus" <n_apollonius_quadratus@...> wrote:
>
> N. Apollonius Quadratus Andy omnibusque salvete.
>
> In general, this doesn't excuse the fact that Modianus is legally Censor. There is no legal loophole as it establishes a chronological impossibility if the service was to include consecutive as a basis for refusal to allow the candidate. The law is poorly written, and much posturing as of late is done to preform deeds I find unsavory. A part from that, yes there is far less Romanesque things being talked about as of late. So I think my next post to the ML will be Roman related. Hm.
>
> Valete.
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "livia_plauta" <livia.plauta@> wrote:
> >
> > Salve Andy,
> > I wish some of the people here would take your advice. Unfortunately their aim seems to be to drive constructive people like you away. I seems they succeed in 95% of the cases.
> > Then they complai because NR has few assidui.
> >
> > Vale
> > Livia
> >
> > > potential benefits involved. Like Roman politics that much? Stop by a hobby shop, Reiner Knizia's game "Quo Vadis" and invite some friends over
> > > for an evening of politicking and wine. You'll have more fun.
> > >
> > > Let's face it - if this were the real Roman Republic and/or people wanted to really resolve the recent NR problems "in the Roman way", one or both factions
> > > would head down to the local gladiatorial school with a sack of denarii, hire a pack of goons and waylay their opponents on the road to Praeneste. Anyone
> > > familiar with the Gracchi brothers, Sullan proscriptions, Catilinian conspiracy or the civil wars knows this. So, when one or the other side lays claim to
> > > doing things "in the Roman way", let's face it this is a more civilized age and noone here is doing things as the Romans themselves would have.
> > >
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67626 From: Q. Valerius Poplicola Date: 2009-06-20
Subject: Re: Protecting Our Votes and Future Elections
You see sexism where none exist. I've never said anything negative to Diana at all, even now that we seem to be on the opposite side of this debate.

Also, I have nothing but respect for Maria Caeca, Flavia Merula, Vibia Rutilia, Aeternia, and of course Gaia Aurelia Alexandra, among many others.

You, on the other hand, just went on again, after promising the Pontifex Maximus to insult no more, and yet resorted again to obvious lies and slander.

Why, Maior, did you lie to the Pontifex Maximus?

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Maior" <rory12001@...> wrote:
>
> Salve Valeria Messalina;
> it has been noted and not by a female either, that there is a distincly misogynistic tone used by some against the Nova Roman women who speak up. Sexist and dismissive. I've had those posts from Poplicola, Cato, Paulinus, just recently.
> It's rude and has no place in Nova Roma, and no sexism isn't 'mos'. I've heard that old argument done to death..
> bene vale
> Maior
>
>
>
> > Sir, I do not need your permission or your approval as to how I sign or do not sign my posts, thank you.
> >
> >
> > <<Learn how the game was played (politica games of power) use the tools the romans did; and learn to take those consequences the good and the bad.>>
> >  
> > In fact, I urge all the women of Nova Roma to speak their minds when they so feel the need to do so on any issue. Whether I agree with their views or not, I will always support the right of all Nova Roman women to speak up, Vestals included.
> >  
> > Maxima Valeria Messallina
> > Sacerdos Vestalis
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67627 From: gurupoetess Date: 2009-06-20
Subject: Re: Protecting Our Votes and Future Elections
Salve Hortensia Maior et Omnes,


I'd actually have to disagree with that statement. That as another female citizen (and Aeternia is very much female) I've encountered nothing but politeness, cordiality, and civility, from these gentlemen.. In actuality Poplicola has earned my respect because although we may not agree in some aspects, he does respect what I have to say.


I believe in your case, it seems that you two do not get along in general no matter what the subject may be.. You both seem very passionate, stubborn, scholarly individuals,but just on opposite ends of the fiery spectrum..

So again it seems a personality conflict, than that of gender...


Vale Bene,
Aeternia










In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Maior" <rory12001@...> wrote:
>
> Salve Valeria Messalina;
> it has been noted and not by a female either, that there is a distincly misogynistic tone used by some against the Nova Roman women who speak up. Sexist and dismissive. I've had those posts from Poplicola, Cato, Paulinus, just recently.
> It's rude and has no place in Nova Roma, and no sexism isn't 'mos'. I've heard that old argument done to death..
> bene vale
> Maior
>
>
>
> > Sir, I do not need your permission or your approval as to how I sign or do not sign my posts, thank you.
> >
> >
> > <<Learn how the game was played (politica games of power) use the tools the romans did; and learn to take those consequences the good and the bad.>>
> > �
> > In fact, I urge all the women of Nova Roma to speak their minds when they so feel the need to do so on any issue. Whether I agree with their views or not, I will always support the right of all Nova Roman women to speak up, Vestals included.
> > �
> > Maxima Valeria Messallina
> > Sacerdos Vestalis
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67628 From: Maior Date: 2009-06-20
Subject: Re: Digest Number 4586 - Some observations from the peanut gallery
So Andy:)
I think talking about philosophy appeals to me, now. I'm very inclined to epicureanism! lol...lathe bios.
optime vale

>
>
> Modianus is not legally censor, and this has been clearly explained by Cn.,
> Iulius Caesar.
>
>
>
> Furthermore, the talking point that this law is poorly written does not
> excuse breaking the law's clear intent.
>
>
>
> If you wonder what the clear intent is, please read the archives.
>
>
>
> Vale.
>
>
>
> _____
>
> From: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com [mailto:Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf
> Of n_apollonius_quadratus
> Sent: Saturday, June 20, 2009 3:14 PM
> To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Digest Number 4586 - Some observations from the
> peanut gallery
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> N. Apollonius Quadratus Andy omnibusque salvete.
>
> In general, this doesn't excuse the fact that Modianus is legally Censor.
> There is no legal loophole as it establishes a chronological impossibility
> if the service was to include consecutive as a basis for refusal to allow
> the candidate. The law is poorly written, and much posturing as of late is
> done to preform deeds I find unsavory. A part from that, yes there is far
> less Romanesque things being talked about as of late. So I think my next
> post to the ML will be Roman related. Hm.
>
> Valete.
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogrou <mailto:Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com> ps.com,
> "livia_plauta" <
>
>
>
>
> <http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma/message/67537;_ylc=X3oDMTM2ZTAwYXM4
> BF9TAzk3MzU5NzE0BGdycElkAzYyODgwMzkEZ3Jwc3BJZAMxNzA1MzEzNzEyBG1zZ0lkAzY3NjEy
> BHNlYwNmdHIEc2xrA3Z0cGMEc3RpbWUDMTI0NTUzOTg3OQR0cGNJZAM2NzUzNw--> Messages
> in this topic (7)
> <http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma/post;_ylc=X3oDMTJxOGQ1ZGJpBF9TAzk3M
> zU5NzE0BGdycElkAzYyODgwMzkEZ3Jwc3BJZAMxNzA1MzEzNzEyBG1zZ0lkAzY3NjEyBHNlYwNmd
> HIEc2xrA3JwbHkEc3RpbWUDMTI0NTUzOTg3OQ--?act=reply&messageNum=67612> Reply
> (via web post) |
> <http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma/post;_ylc=X3oDMTJldmNhZWlkBF9TAzk3M
> zU5NzE0BGdycElkAzYyODgwMzkEZ3Jwc3BJZAMxNzA1MzEzNzEyBHNlYwNmdHIEc2xrA250cGMEc
> 3RpbWUDMTI0NTUzOTg3OQ--> Start a new topic
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67629 From: C. Maria Caeca Date: 2009-06-20
Subject: Nova Roman women
Salvete,


I just had to change the subject line (pet peeve), because, well, when we
don't change them, I get very confused, and I begin to feel like I'm playing
some sort of game of chance ... never knowing what I'll be reading (smile).

To the topic: While I am not especially outspoken or confrontational, I
must say that, with one marked exception, I have received nothing but
civility, respect, and even kindness here, and, for that, I am grateful.

However, I am quite aware, and accept, that, should I choose to fling myself
into a heated debate, I would be subject to heated responses, and probably a
bit of vicious pettiness, as happens with anyone else. From my observation,
women are, mostly, treated as citizens, with no reference to their sex, and
that, in my opinion, is a good thing.

C. Maria Caeca
----- Original Message -----
From: "Q. Valerius Poplicola" <q.valerius.poplicola@...>
To: <Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Saturday, June 20, 2009 7:56 PM
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Protecting Our Votes and Future Elections


You see sexism where none exist. I've never said anything negative to Diana
at all, even now that we seem to be on the opposite side of this debate.

Also, I have nothing but respect for Maria Caeca, Flavia Merula, Vibia
Rutilia, Aeternia, and of course Gaia Aurelia Alexandra, among many others.

You, on the other hand, just went on again, after promising the Pontifex
Maximus to insult no more, and yet resorted again to obvious lies and
slander.

Why, Maior, did you lie to the Pontifex Maximus?

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Maior" <rory12001@...> wrote:
>
> Salve Valeria Messalina;
> it has been noted and not by a female either, that there is a distincly
> misogynistic tone used by some against the Nova Roman women who speak up.
> Sexist and dismissive. I've had those posts from Poplicola, Cato,
> Paulinus, just recently.
> It's rude and has no place in Nova Roma, and no sexism isn't 'mos'. I've
> heard that old argument done to death..
> bene vale
> Maior
>
>
>
> > Sir, I do not need your permission or your approval as to how I sign or
> > do not sign my posts, thank you.
> >
> >
> > <<Learn how the game was played (politica games of power) use the tools
> > the romans did; and learn to take those consequences the good and the
> > bad.>>
> >
> > In fact, I urge all the women of Nova Roma to speak their minds when
> > they so feel the need to do so on any issue. Whether I agree with their
> > views or not, I will always support the right of all Nova Roman women to
> > speak up, Vestals included.
> >
> > Maxima Valeria Messallina
> > Sacerdos Vestalis
> >
>




------------------------------------

Yahoo! Groups Links





--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 8.5.339 / Virus Database: 270.12.81/2189 - Release Date: 06/20/09
06:15:00
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67630 From: Maior Date: 2009-06-20
Subject: Re: nova roma is syncretic
Maior Poplicolae sd;

if you would read my post in reply to Sempronius Regulus you will see that I agreed with him and even referred to the chapter in Beard & North "Patrolling the Unacceptable" p. 228 Vol. 1 that deals with the boundaries that Romans had: principally with magic, superstitio, and unrecognized associations that were felt to threaten the state.

This has nothing to do with belief, which motivates the concept of heresy.
Boundaries were very fluid. p. 228, though the elite had to support traditional religion.

Your examples are spotty. Socrates was one philosopher in Greece. The Romans expelled the philosophers from Rome when they felt threatened. The same with Jews and Chaldeans, it was 'from time to time' p.230 not a constant norm.

As most modern scholarship agrees, the cult of Bacchus had been established for a very long time in Italy, It was the changes and the secret meetings, the political complexion that alarmed the Senate, not the worship of Bacchus or the beliefs of the paricipants. (p. 96)

The Senate in the case that you are speaking Lutatius Cerco sent a delegation to consult the Oracle of Delphi. It has nothing to do with belief either in Fortuna or the sortes.
Rather political rivalry. Praeneste was considered a foreign town, with a powerful respected lot oracle. I refer you to J. Champeaux "Sors Oraculi ; Les Oracles en Italie sous La Republique et L'Empire"
p. 273.
vale in pacem Concordiae
M. Hortensia Maior


>
> Poplicola Maiori:
>
> >> the Romans during the Republic did not have the concept of religious heretics.
>
> This charge is fallacious. Romans, like their Greek counterparts, were concerned with religious taboos and customs just as much as the Christians are with belief. Several points:
>
> Socrates was killed for atheism;
> Philosophers and Jews have both been expelled from Rome;
> the Bacchus cult was repressed;
> Lutatius Cerco was forbidden by the Senate from consulting the oracle of Fortuna at Praeneste - auspices had to be taken inside Rome.
>
> This is one point where you and I disagree over religion. One's personal, family cult is there own business, but it's outright false to suggest that the ancient had no concept of "heresy".
>
> Vale.
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Maior" <rory12001@> wrote:
> >
> > -Salvete;
> > I was speaking of all culti,Judaism, Zoroastrianism, Isis worshippers, Pythagoreans.
> >
> > the Romans during the Republic did not have the concept of religious heretics. During the Empire up to Constantine, which the religio here in Nova Roma follows, there wasn't such a concept. There are no heresies and no heretics in Nova Roma.
> >
> > It is alien to our culture, to the tolerant syncretic place Nova Roma is.
> >
> > Anyone who calls himself or herself a Christian, is one; gnostic christians, rc christians, orthodox christians, universalists are all equal here. The same if cives worship Isis, Yahweh, Odin, also atheists agnostics, philosophers!
> >
> > We have the state cultus deorum but for everything else:
> >
> > All are equal in Nova Roma! We are a liberal tolerant syncretic polytheistic organization.
> > valete
> > M.Hortensia Maior
> >
> >
> > > Salvete.
> > >
> > > An incorrect depiction has, once again, been given of my private cultus. "[D]uring the republic" there was no such thing as Christianity, as Christ had yet to be born; long before the end of the Western Empire Christianity had formulated itself in contrast to many various and sundry heresies - among them, Gnosticism.
> > >
> > > Valete,
> > >
> > > Cato
> > >
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67631 From: A. Sempronius Regulus Date: 2009-06-20
Subject: Father's Day and [Nova-Roma] Nova Roman women

Vive la différence!
 
The Romans invented the toast, including the toast to women. Literally, they'd dedicate a round to the gods and women but acidity of the wine, apparently, made dropping burnt toast into the wine a means to make it more drinkable according to the Encyclopaedia Britannica. A toast!
 
Here’s to love, The only fire against which there is no insurance.
-
God made women both beautiful and foolish–
Beautiful, that man might love her;
Foolish, that she might love him.
Here’s head first, to a foaming glass!
Here’s head first, to a lively lass!
Here’s head first, for a bit of kissing,
For the good don’t know the fun they are missing!

And to the Father's, the lucky dogs.

--- On Sun, 6/21/09, C. Maria Caeca <shoshanahathaway@...> wrote:

From: C. Maria Caeca <shoshanahathaway@comcast..net>
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Nova Roman women
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Date: Sunday, June 21, 2009, 12:33 AM

Salvete,

I just had to change the subject line (pet peeve), because, well, when we
don't change them, I get very confused, and I begin to feel like I'm playing
some sort of game of chance ... never knowing what I'll be reading (smile).

To the topic: While I am not especially outspoken or confrontational, I
must say that, with one marked exception, I have received nothing but
civility, respect, and even kindness here, and, for that, I am grateful.

However, I am quite aware, and accept, that, should I choose to fling myself
into a heated debate, I would be subject to heated responses, and probably a
bit of vicious pettiness, as happens with anyone else. From my observation,
women are, mostly, treated as citizens, with no reference to their sex, and
that, in my opinion, is a good thing.

C. Maria Caeca
----- Original Message -----
From: "Q. Valerius Poplicola" <q.valerius.poplicol a@...>
To: <Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com>
Sent: Saturday, June 20, 2009 7:56 PM
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Protecting Our Votes and Future Elections

You see sexism where none exist. I've never said anything negative to Diana
at all, even now that we seem to be on the opposite side of this debate.

Also, I have nothing but respect for Maria Caeca, Flavia Merula, Vibia
Rutilia, Aeternia, and of course Gaia Aurelia Alexandra, among many others.

You, on the other hand, just went on again, after promising the Pontifex
Maximus to insult no more, and yet resorted again to obvious lies and
slander.

Why, Maior, did you lie to the Pontifex Maximus?

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com, "Maior" <rory12001@. ..> wrote:
>
> Salve Valeria Messalina;
> it has been noted and not by a female either, that there is a distincly
> misogynistic tone used by some against the Nova Roman women who speak up.
> Sexist and dismissive. I've had those posts from Poplicola, Cato,
> Paulinus, just recently.
> It's rude and has no place in Nova Roma, and no sexism isn't 'mos'. I've
> heard that old argument done to death..
> bene vale
> Maior
>
>
>
> > Sir, I do not need your permission or your approval as to how I sign or
> > do not sign my posts, thank you.
> >
> >
> > <<Learn how the game was played (politica games of power) use the tools
> > the romans did; and learn to take those consequences the good and the
> > bad.>>
> >
> > In fact, I urge all the women of Nova Roma to speak their minds when
> > they so feel the need to do so on any issue. Whether I agree with their
> > views or not, I will always support the right of all Nova Roman women to
> > speak up, Vestals included.
> >
> > Maxima Valeria Messallina
> > Sacerdos Vestalis
> >
>

------------ --------- --------- ------

Yahoo! Groups Links

------------ --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- -

No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 8.5.339 / Virus Database: 270.12.81/2189 - Release Date: 06/20/09
06:15:00


Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67632 From: Maior Date: 2009-06-20
Subject: Re: Protecting Our Votes and Future Elections
from post 67532#
"Other than that, I am simply not going to respond to you any more, just as I no
longer do in the Senate House or on the Back Alley or on the Law Review List.
Responding to you is like talking to a pigeon - cute for the tourists but
ultimately a useless affectation that brings no worthwhile result."

That's sexist, dismissive and condescending also "the tottering shreds of your reputation."

You have no respect; you are sexist, rude and excessively addicted to your private 'orthodox christian' cultus, which the Romans termed superstitio: an unhealthy devotion to religion. And now in another post, belaboring the PM Piscinus.

You certainly do not display the tolerant liberal religiously syncretic spirit of Nova Roma.
Maior




--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Gaius Equitius Cato" <catoinnyc@...> wrote:
>
> Cato omnibus in foro SPD
>
> Salvete.
>
> Again, I challenge anyone to show me a single post in which I have advocated or practiced misogyny.
>
> It is these kinds of throwaway comments that do the most damage to Maior's last, tottering shreds of credibility.
>
> This is at least the third time in as many months that she has lied about what I have said or done. For the praetors who showed such deep concern over factual errors and misconceptions, Maior certainly has had an incredibly free hand.
>
> Valete,
>
> Cato
>
>
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Maior" <rory12001@> wrote:
> >
> > Salve Valeria Messalina;
> > it has been noted and not by a female either, that there is a distincly misogynistic tone used by some against the Nova Roman women who speak up. Sexist and dismissive. I've had those posts from Poplicola, Cato, Paulinus, just recently.
> > It's rude and has no place in Nova Roma, and no sexism isn't 'mos'. I've heard that old argument done to death..
> > bene vale
> > Maior
> >
> >
> >
> > > Sir, I do not need your permission or your approval as to how I sign or do not sign my posts, thank you.
> > >
> > >
> > > <<Learn how the game was played (politica games of power) use the tools the romans did; and learn to take those consequences the good and the bad.>>
> > >  
> > > In fact, I urge all the women of Nova Roma to speak their minds when they so feel the need to do so on any issue. Whether I agree with their views or not, I will always support the right of all Nova Roman women to speak up, Vestals included.
> > >  
> > > Maxima Valeria Messallina
> > > Sacerdos Vestalis
> > >
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67633 From: Q. Valerius Poplicola Date: 2009-06-20
Subject: Re: nova roma is syncretic
You and I are arguing about two different things, and as usual you moved your goal posts. Heresy is opposed to orthodox, which is the correct teachings. At its fundamental level, it's not belief either, although it's interpreted as belief in the Christian sense. Romans, on the other hand, were orthopractic, that is what is correct in what is done is what matters.

But prithee, how can you have something done correctly (orthopraxy) if it was taught wrongly (heterodox)? You can't.

It was not acceptable that anyone believed anything, and as evidenced by the Christian purges, everything was not tolerated either.

Poplicola

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Maior" <rory12001@...> wrote:
>
> Maior Poplicolae sd;
>
> if you would read my post in reply to Sempronius Regulus you will see that I agreed with him and even referred to the chapter in Beard & North "Patrolling the Unacceptable" p. 228 Vol. 1 that deals with the boundaries that Romans had: principally with magic, superstitio, and unrecognized associations that were felt to threaten the state.
>
> This has nothing to do with belief, which motivates the concept of heresy.
> Boundaries were very fluid. p. 228, though the elite had to support traditional religion.
>
> Your examples are spotty. Socrates was one philosopher in Greece. The Romans expelled the philosophers from Rome when they felt threatened. The same with Jews and Chaldeans, it was 'from time to time' p.230 not a constant norm.
>
> As most modern scholarship agrees, the cult of Bacchus had been established for a very long time in Italy, It was the changes and the secret meetings, the political complexion that alarmed the Senate, not the worship of Bacchus or the beliefs of the paricipants. (p. 96)
>
> The Senate in the case that you are speaking Lutatius Cerco sent a delegation to consult the Oracle of Delphi. It has nothing to do with belief either in Fortuna or the sortes.
> Rather political rivalry. Praeneste was considered a foreign town, with a powerful respected lot oracle. I refer you to J. Champeaux "Sors Oraculi ; Les Oracles en Italie sous La Republique et L'Empire"
> p. 273.
> vale in pacem Concordiae
> M. Hortensia Maior
>
>
> >
> > Poplicola Maiori:
> >
> > >> the Romans during the Republic did not have the concept of religious heretics.
> >
> > This charge is fallacious. Romans, like their Greek counterparts, were concerned with religious taboos and customs just as much as the Christians are with belief. Several points:
> >
> > Socrates was killed for atheism;
> > Philosophers and Jews have both been expelled from Rome;
> > the Bacchus cult was repressed;
> > Lutatius Cerco was forbidden by the Senate from consulting the oracle of Fortuna at Praeneste - auspices had to be taken inside Rome.
> >
> > This is one point where you and I disagree over religion. One's personal, family cult is there own business, but it's outright false to suggest that the ancient had no concept of "heresy".
> >
> > Vale.
> >
> > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Maior" <rory12001@> wrote:
> > >
> > > -Salvete;
> > > I was speaking of all culti,Judaism, Zoroastrianism, Isis worshippers, Pythagoreans.
> > >
> > > the Romans during the Republic did not have the concept of religious heretics. During the Empire up to Constantine, which the religio here in Nova Roma follows, there wasn't such a concept. There are no heresies and no heretics in Nova Roma.
> > >
> > > It is alien to our culture, to the tolerant syncretic place Nova Roma is.
> > >
> > > Anyone who calls himself or herself a Christian, is one; gnostic christians, rc christians, orthodox christians, universalists are all equal here. The same if cives worship Isis, Yahweh, Odin, also atheists agnostics, philosophers!
> > >
> > > We have the state cultus deorum but for everything else:
> > >
> > > All are equal in Nova Roma! We are a liberal tolerant syncretic polytheistic organization.
> > > valete
> > > M.Hortensia Maior
> > >
> > >
> > > > Salvete.
> > > >
> > > > An incorrect depiction has, once again, been given of my private cultus. "[D]uring the republic" there was no such thing as Christianity, as Christ had yet to be born; long before the end of the Western Empire Christianity had formulated itself in contrast to many various and sundry heresies - among them, Gnosticism.
> > > >
> > > > Valete,
> > > >
> > > > Cato
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67634 From: Maior Date: 2009-06-20
Subject: Re: nova roma is syncretic
-We had the binary discussion, it was Agricola, Gualterus and myself, where we discussed the limits of such delineations and how outdated they are; not in tune with current scholarship.
Maior

>
> You and I are arguing about two different things, and as usual you moved your goal posts. Heresy is opposed to orthodox, which is the correct teachings. At its fundamental level, it's not belief either, although it's interpreted as belief in the Christian sense. Romans, on the other hand, were orthopractic, that is what is correct in what is done is what matters.
>
> But prithee, how can you have something done correctly (orthopraxy) if it was taught wrongly (heterodox)? You can't.
>
> It was not acceptable that anyone believed anything, and as evidenced by the Christian purges, everything was not tolerated either.
>
> Poplicola
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Maior" <rory12001@> wrote:
> >
> > Maior Poplicolae sd;
> >
> > if you would read my post in reply to Sempronius Regulus you will see that I agreed with him and even referred to the chapter in Beard & North "Patrolling the Unacceptable" p. 228 Vol. 1 that deals with the boundaries that Romans had: principally with magic, superstitio, and unrecognized associations that were felt to threaten the state.
> >
> > This has nothing to do with belief, which motivates the concept of heresy.
> > Boundaries were very fluid. p. 228, though the elite had to support traditional religion.
> >
> > Your examples are spotty. Socrates was one philosopher in Greece. The Romans expelled the philosophers from Rome when they felt threatened. The same with Jews and Chaldeans, it was 'from time to time' p.230 not a constant norm.
> >
> > As most modern scholarship agrees, the cult of Bacchus had been established for a very long time in Italy, It was the changes and the secret meetings, the political complexion that alarmed the Senate, not the worship of Bacchus or the beliefs of the paricipants. (p. 96)
> >
> > The Senate in the case that you are speaking Lutatius Cerco sent a delegation to consult the Oracle of Delphi. It has nothing to do with belief either in Fortuna or the sortes.
> > Rather political rivalry. Praeneste was considered a foreign town, with a powerful respected lot oracle. I refer you to J. Champeaux "Sors Oraculi ; Les Oracles en Italie sous La Republique et L'Empire"
> > p. 273.
> > vale in pacem Concordiae
> > M. Hortensia Maior
> >
> >
> > >
> > > Poplicola Maiori:
> > >
> > > >> the Romans during the Republic did not have the concept of religious heretics.
> > >
> > > This charge is fallacious. Romans, like their Greek counterparts, were concerned with religious taboos and customs just as much as the Christians are with belief. Several points:
> > >
> > > Socrates was killed for atheism;
> > > Philosophers and Jews have both been expelled from Rome;
> > > the Bacchus cult was repressed;
> > > Lutatius Cerco was forbidden by the Senate from consulting the oracle of Fortuna at Praeneste - auspices had to be taken inside Rome.
> > >
> > > This is one point where you and I disagree over religion. One's personal, family cult is there own business, but it's outright false to suggest that the ancient had no concept of "heresy".
> > >
> > > Vale.
> > >
> > > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Maior" <rory12001@> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > -Salvete;
> > > > I was speaking of all culti,Judaism, Zoroastrianism, Isis worshippers, Pythagoreans.
> > > >
> > > > the Romans during the Republic did not have the concept of religious heretics. During the Empire up to Constantine, which the religio here in Nova Roma follows, there wasn't such a concept. There are no heresies and no heretics in Nova Roma.
> > > >
> > > > It is alien to our culture, to the tolerant syncretic place Nova Roma is.
> > > >
> > > > Anyone who calls himself or herself a Christian, is one; gnostic christians, rc christians, orthodox christians, universalists are all equal here. The same if cives worship Isis, Yahweh, Odin, also atheists agnostics, philosophers!
> > > >
> > > > We have the state cultus deorum but for everything else:
> > > >
> > > > All are equal in Nova Roma! We are a liberal tolerant syncretic polytheistic organization.
> > > > valete
> > > > M.Hortensia Maior
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > Salvete.
> > > > >
> > > > > An incorrect depiction has, once again, been given of my private cultus. "[D]uring the republic" there was no such thing as Christianity, as Christ had yet to be born; long before the end of the Western Empire Christianity had formulated itself in contrast to many various and sundry heresies - among them, Gnosticism.
> > > > >
> > > > > Valete,
> > > > >
> > > > > Cato
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67635 From: C. Maria Caeca Date: 2009-06-20
Subject: Re: Father's Day and [Nova-Roma] Nova Roman women

What can I say to *that* but ... happy Father's Day to all our fathers!  May someone you love (or a good restaurant chef) prepare your favorite foods, may you find the sport of your choice on Cable TV (or Satellite), and may you be gifted with your most desired "guy" toys!
 
C. Maria Caeca
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Saturday, June 20, 2009 8:53 PM
Subject: Father's Day and [Nova-Roma] Nova Roman women


Vive la différence!
 
The Romans invented the toast, including the toast to women. Literally, they'd dedicate a round to the gods and women but acidity of the wine, apparently, made dropping burnt toast into the wine a means to make it more drinkable according to the Encyclopaedia Britannica. A toast!
 
Here’s to love, The only fire against which there is no insurance.
-
God made women both beautiful and foolish–
Beautiful, that man might love her;
Foolish, that she might love him.
Here’s head first, to a foaming glass!
Here’s head first, to a lively lass!
Here’s head first, for a bit of kissing,
For the good don’t know the fun they are missing!

And to the Father's, the lucky dogs.

--- On Sun, 6/21/09, C. Maria Caeca <shoshanahathaway@...> wrote:

From: C. Maria Caeca <shoshanahathaway@comcast..net>
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Nova Roman women
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Date: Sunday, June 21, 2009, 12:33 AM

Salvete,

I just had to change the subject line (pet peeve), because, well, when we
don't change them, I get very confused, and I begin to feel like I'm playing
some sort of game of chance ... never knowing what I'll be reading (smile).

To the topic: While I am not especially outspoken or confrontational, I
must say that, with one marked exception, I have received nothing but
civility, respect, and even kindness here, and, for that, I am grateful.

However, I am quite aware, and accept, that, should I choose to fling myself
into a heated debate, I would be subject to heated responses, and probably a
bit of vicious pettiness, as happens with anyone else. From my observation,
women are, mostly, treated as citizens, with no reference to their sex, and
that, in my opinion, is a good thing.

C. Maria Caeca
----- Original Message -----
From: "Q. Valerius Poplicola" <q.valerius.poplicol a@...>
To: <Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com>
Sent: Saturday, June 20, 2009 7:56 PM
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Protecting Our Votes and Future Elections

You see sexism where none exist. I've never said anything negative to Diana
at all, even now that we seem to be on the opposite side of this debate.

Also, I have nothing but respect for Maria Caeca, Flavia Merula, Vibia
Rutilia, Aeternia, and of course Gaia Aurelia Alexandra, among many others.

You, on the other hand, just went on again, after promising the Pontifex
Maximus to insult no more, and yet resorted again to obvious lies and
slander.

Why, Maior, did you lie to the Pontifex Maximus?

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com, "Maior" <rory12001@. ..> wrote:
>
> Salve Valeria Messalina;
> it has been noted and not by a female either, that there is a distincly
> misogynistic tone used by some against the Nova Roman women who speak up.
> Sexist and dismissive. I've had those posts from Poplicola, Cato,
> Paulinus, just recently.
> It's rude and has no place in Nova Roma, and no sexism isn't 'mos'. I've
> heard that old argument done to death..
> bene vale
> Maior
>
>
>
> > Sir, I do not need your permission or your approval as to how I sign or
> > do not sign my posts, thank you.
> >
> >
> > <<Learn how the game was played (politica games of power) use the tools
> > the romans did; and learn to take those consequences the good and the
> > bad.>>
> >
> > In fact, I urge all the women of Nova Roma to speak their minds when
> > they so feel the need to do so on any issue. Whether I agree with their
> > views or not, I will always support the right of all Nova Roman women to
> > speak up, Vestals included.
> >
> > Maxima Valeria Messallina
> > Sacerdos Vestalis
> >
>

------------ --------- --------- ------

Yahoo! Groups Links

------------ --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- -

No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 8.5.339 / Virus Database: 270.12.81/2189 - Release Date: 06/20/09
06:15:00




No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 8.5.339 / Virus Database: 270.12.81/2189 - Release Date: 06/20/09 06:15:00

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67636 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2009-06-20
Subject: Re: Protecting Our Votes and Future Elections
Cato Maiori sal.

Salve!

You got me to respond directly to you! Brava! :)

Do you not see the irony in saying

"excessively addicted to your private 'orthodox christian' cultus, which the Romans termed superstitio"

in one breath and

"You certainly do not display the tolerant liberal religiously syncretic spirit of Nova Roma"

in the next?

Maior, I am dismissive and condescending to *you*, not to women; your unique personality and demeanor so transcend boundaries of sex and gender that it is almost impossible to adequately describe them in human terms, let alone English.

Vale,

Cato
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67637 From: Maior Date: 2009-06-20
Subject: Re: Father's Day and [Nova-Roma] Nova Roman women
Salve;
how kind and happy Father's Day to you Regule. I had an early one with my fabulous Pater, the most wonderful father there is. I hope there is plenty of sunshine as you're camping tomorrow! And to all fathers in Nova Roma;
bonum diem patribus!
Marca Hortensia Maior

> What can I say to *that* but ... happy Father's Day to all our fathers! May someone you love (or a good restaurant chef) prepare your favorite foods, may you find the sport of your choice on Cable TV (or Satellite), and may you be gifted with your most desired "guy" toys!
>
> C. Maria Caeca
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: A. Sempronius Regulus
> To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Saturday, June 20, 2009 8:53 PM
> Subject: Father's Day and [Nova-Roma] Nova Roman women
>
>
>
>
>
> Vive la différence!
>
> The Romans invented the toast, including the toast to women. Literally, they'd dedicate a round to the gods and women but acidity of the wine, apparently, made dropping burnt toast into the wine a means to make it more drinkable according to the Encyclopaedia Britannica. A toast!
>
> Here’s to love, The only fire against which there is no insurance.
> -
> God made women both beautiful and foolishâ€"
> Beautiful, that man might love her;
> Foolish, that she might love him.
>
> Here’s head first, to a foaming glass!
> Here’s head first, to a lively lass!
> Here’s head first, for a bit of kissing,
> For the good don’t know the fun they are missing!
>
> And to the Father's, the lucky dogs.
>
> --- On Sun, 6/21/09, C. Maria Caeca <shoshanahathaway@...> wrote:
>
>
> From: C. Maria Caeca <shoshanahathaway@...>
> Subject: [Nova-Roma] Nova Roman women
> To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> Date: Sunday, June 21, 2009, 12:33 AM
>
>
> Salvete,
>
> I just had to change the subject line (pet peeve), because, well, when we
> don't change them, I get very confused, and I begin to feel like I'm playing
> some sort of game of chance ... never knowing what I'll be reading (smile).
>
> To the topic: While I am not especially outspoken or confrontational, I
> must say that, with one marked exception, I have received nothing but
> civility, respect, and even kindness here, and, for that, I am grateful.
>
> However, I am quite aware, and accept, that, should I choose to fling myself
> into a heated debate, I would be subject to heated responses, and probably a
> bit of vicious pettiness, as happens with anyone else. From my observation,
> women are, mostly, treated as citizens, with no reference to their sex, and
> that, in my opinion, is a good thing.
>
> C. Maria Caeca
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Q. Valerius Poplicola" <q.valerius.poplicol a@...>
> To: <Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com>
> Sent: Saturday, June 20, 2009 7:56 PM
> Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Protecting Our Votes and Future Elections
>
> You see sexism where none exist. I've never said anything negative to Diana
> at all, even now that we seem to be on the opposite side of this debate.
>
> Also, I have nothing but respect for Maria Caeca, Flavia Merula, Vibia
> Rutilia, Aeternia, and of course Gaia Aurelia Alexandra, among many others.
>
> You, on the other hand, just went on again, after promising the Pontifex
> Maximus to insult no more, and yet resorted again to obvious lies and
> slander.
>
> Why, Maior, did you lie to the Pontifex Maximus?
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com, "Maior" <rory12001@ ..> wrote:
> >
> > Salve Valeria Messalina;
> > it has been noted and not by a female either, that there is a distincly
> > misogynistic tone used by some against the Nova Roman women who speak up.
> > Sexist and dismissive. I've had those posts from Poplicola, Cato,
> > Paulinus, just recently.
> > It's rude and has no place in Nova Roma, and no sexism isn't 'mos'. I've
> > heard that old argument done to death..
> > bene vale
> > Maior
> >
> >
> >
> > > Sir, I do not need your permission or your approval as to how I sign or
> > > do not sign my posts, thank you.
> > >
> > >
> > > <<Learn how the game was played (politica games of power) use the tools
> > > the romans did; and learn to take those consequences the good and the
> > > bad.>>
> > >
> > > In fact, I urge all the women of Nova Roma to speak their minds when
> > > they so feel the need to do so on any issue. Whether I agree with their
> > > views or not, I will always support the right of all Nova Roman women to
> > > speak up, Vestals included.
> > >
> > > Maxima Valeria Messallina
> > > Sacerdos Vestalis
> > >
> >
>
> ------------ --------- --------- ------
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
> ------------ --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- -
>
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> Version: 8.5.339 / Virus Database: 270.12.81/2189 - Release Date: 06/20/09
> 06:15:00
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> Version: 8.5.339 / Virus Database: 270.12.81/2189 - Release Date: 06/20/09 06:15:00
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67638 From: gualterus_graecus Date: 2009-06-20
Subject: NR Identity a Fantasy Construct? (was: Re: nova roma is syncretic)
Salvete Maior, Pop,

Well, since those terms are still widely used in contemporary scholarship I wouldn't say they're outdated. When they are used, however, it usually isn't in a mutually exclusive sense, which was my point in one of the last posts on that subject last month. A system can (and almost always does) have elements of both.

When these terms are loosely used to characterize an entire system what is usually meant is that one of these modes is dominant over the other. Agricola's point was that they are only rough indicators of what is actually happening on the ground, and I will agree there, but as in all discourse, there are terms reflecting various levels of precision and abstraction; I think both terms can be useful.

As for Cato bringing up orthodoxy vs heresy, I think that is completely legitimate both for him personally and NR in general. If NR is to include Roman culture into the 4th cetury CE then that includes Christianity and all of the baggage that comes with that. NR cannot describe itself purely along polytheistic lines if we're going to maintain that sort of historical timeline; the fact that many in NR do want to push for a purely polytheistic culture is a fundamental schizophrenia within our society. And that we also then have to wrestle with the issue of persecution of Christians within this period problematizes NR's identity and aims even further.

As Cato already pointed out, the Constitution preamble has "from the founding of the City of Rome in 753 BCE to the removal of the altar of Victory from the Senate in 394 CE". This timeline includes the overthrown of Roman polytheistic culture--and yet, the preamble also states that our goal is "to promote the study and practice of pagan Roman civilization". Finally, we are described "as the modern restoration of the ancient Roman Republic". So, what exactly are we? An idealization of Imperial era syncretism combined with the political organization of the Republic, while ignoring Christianity and the evisceration of the public cult in the 4th century? This is a purely fantasy construction--no such Rome ever existed.

I know this is an old topic, however, its ghost still haunts us left and right as seen in the various comments about the Republic, syncretism, opposition to Christian rhetoric while also pretending to being inclusive and it demands some deep structural adjustments within NR.

Valete,

Gualterus

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Maior" <rory12001@...> wrote:
>
> -We had the binary discussion, it was Agricola, Gualterus and myself, where we discussed the limits of such delineations and how outdated they are; not in tune with current scholarship.
> Maior
>
> >
> > You and I are arguing about two different things, and as usual you moved your goal posts. Heresy is opposed to orthodox, which is the correct teachings. At its fundamental level, it's not belief either, although it's interpreted as belief in the Christian sense. Romans, on the other hand, were orthopractic, that is what is correct in what is done is what matters.
> >
> > But prithee, how can you have something done correctly (orthopraxy) if it was taught wrongly (heterodox)? You can't.
> >
> > It was not acceptable that anyone believed anything, and as evidenced by the Christian purges, everything was not tolerated either.
> >
> > Poplicola
> >
> > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Maior" <rory12001@> wrote:
> > >
> > > Maior Poplicolae sd;
> > >
> > > if you would read my post in reply to Sempronius Regulus you will see that I agreed with him and even referred to the chapter in Beard & North "Patrolling the Unacceptable" p. 228 Vol. 1 that deals with the boundaries that Romans had: principally with magic, superstitio, and unrecognized associations that were felt to threaten the state.
> > >
> > > This has nothing to do with belief, which motivates the concept of heresy.
> > > Boundaries were very fluid. p. 228, though the elite had to support traditional religion.
> > >
> > > Your examples are spotty. Socrates was one philosopher in Greece. The Romans expelled the philosophers from Rome when they felt threatened. The same with Jews and Chaldeans, it was 'from time to time' p.230 not a constant norm.
> > >
> > > As most modern scholarship agrees, the cult of Bacchus had been established for a very long time in Italy, It was the changes and the secret meetings, the political complexion that alarmed the Senate, not the worship of Bacchus or the beliefs of the paricipants. (p. 96)
> > >
> > > The Senate in the case that you are speaking Lutatius Cerco sent a delegation to consult the Oracle of Delphi. It has nothing to do with belief either in Fortuna or the sortes.
> > > Rather political rivalry. Praeneste was considered a foreign town, with a powerful respected lot oracle. I refer you to J. Champeaux "Sors Oraculi ; Les Oracles en Italie sous La Republique et L'Empire"
> > > p. 273.
> > > vale in pacem Concordiae
> > > M. Hortensia Maior
> > >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > Poplicola Maiori:
> > > >
> > > > >> the Romans during the Republic did not have the concept of religious heretics.
> > > >
> > > > This charge is fallacious. Romans, like their Greek counterparts, were concerned with religious taboos and customs just as much as the Christians are with belief. Several points:
> > > >
> > > > Socrates was killed for atheism;
> > > > Philosophers and Jews have both been expelled from Rome;
> > > > the Bacchus cult was repressed;
> > > > Lutatius Cerco was forbidden by the Senate from consulting the oracle of Fortuna at Praeneste - auspices had to be taken inside Rome.
> > > >
> > > > This is one point where you and I disagree over religion. One's personal, family cult is there own business, but it's outright false to suggest that the ancient had no concept of "heresy".
> > > >
> > > > Vale.
> > > >
> > > > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Maior" <rory12001@> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > -Salvete;
> > > > > I was speaking of all culti,Judaism, Zoroastrianism, Isis worshippers, Pythagoreans.
> > > > >
> > > > > the Romans during the Republic did not have the concept of religious heretics. During the Empire up to Constantine, which the religio here in Nova Roma follows, there wasn't such a concept. There are no heresies and no heretics in Nova Roma.
> > > > >
> > > > > It is alien to our culture, to the tolerant syncretic place Nova Roma is.
> > > > >
> > > > > Anyone who calls himself or herself a Christian, is one; gnostic christians, rc christians, orthodox christians, universalists are all equal here. The same if cives worship Isis, Yahweh, Odin, also atheists agnostics, philosophers!
> > > > >
> > > > > We have the state cultus deorum but for everything else:
> > > > >
> > > > > All are equal in Nova Roma! We are a liberal tolerant syncretic polytheistic organization.
> > > > > valete
> > > > > M.Hortensia Maior
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > > Salvete.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > An incorrect depiction has, once again, been given of my private cultus. "[D]uring the republic" there was no such thing as Christianity, as Christ had yet to be born; long before the end of the Western Empire Christianity had formulated itself in contrast to many various and sundry heresies - among them, Gnosticism.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Valete,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Cato
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67639 From: Robert Levee Date: 2009-06-20
Subject: My Statement of Opposition to the Intercessio!
Salve et salvete,

As a Tribunis Plebus has three options in their decision making process. I am before you now, to render my stance,on the intercessio filed by my fellow Tribunis Plebus Agrippa.

Of the three choices there is agreement,opposition and abstention.

I am in complete opposition to this intercessio!

I do not think I can make it any clearer than that.

Vale et valete,

Ap.Galerius Aurelianus
Tribunis Plebus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67640 From: M. Lucretius Agricola Date: 2009-06-20
Subject: NR Identity a Fantasy Construct? (was: Re: nova roma is syncretic)
Agricola Graeco sal,

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "gualterus_graecus" <waltms1@...> wrote:
>
>
> I know this is an old topic, however, its ghost still haunts us left and right as seen in the various comments about the Republic, syncretism, opposition to Christian rhetoric while also pretending to being inclusive and it demands some deep structural adjustments within NR.
>
> Valete,
>
> Gualterus
>

I have just a moment to dip in...

I don't think we have "opposition to Christian rhetoric" as much as we have opposition to the notion that the Christian rhetoric, or any specific rhetoric, is the only correct view. We should welcome not only polytheism, but multiculturalism and a variety of viewpoints, and a more sophisticated methodology.

To take the specific example at hand, the "praxy/doxy" axis is one way of understanding, but not the only one and it may not be the best one for all parties. Any axis of this sort is a mental construction, and as such it may encode certain biases. It is perfectly acceptable, I think, for members of specific community to claim that such axes do not capture the realities that they see and experience. Just because from one viewpoint a set of behaviors can be made to fit within a construct does not mean that the construct is either real or has exclusive validity.

Not to put too fine a point on it, this means that we have to distinguish between people expressing an opinion on terms and people insisting that every else agree to use those terms.

Also, I am in complete agreement with your assessment regarding the use of the polar pairs, that in reality the extremes are seldom if ever populated. The use of the ends of an axis as exclusive polar opposites is one of the problems with framing discussion in these terms. As a methodology these axes have some use as a starting point, but in the end they may be more limiting than useful.

Finally, I think that this sort of discussion is essential to your point about "deep structural adjustments". In my view we have to move not to a different position, but to a more sophisticated view of the positions we have.

Thank you for an interesting discussion.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67641 From: Gnaeus Iulius Caesar Date: 2009-06-20
Subject: Re: My Statement of Opposition to the Intercessio!
Cn Iulius Caesar Ap. Galerio Aureliano SPD

I think you are just under one hour too late, aren't you? Time zones can be a tad confusing. I'll double check though.

Optime vale


--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Robert Levee <galerius_of_rome@...> wrote:
>
>
> Salve et salvete,
>
> As a Tribunis Plebus has three options in their decision making process. I am before you now, to render my stance,on the intercessio filed by my fellow Tribunis Plebus Agrippa.
>
> Of the three choices there is agreement,opposition and abstention.
>
> I am in complete opposition to this intercessio!
>
> I do not think I can make it any clearer than that.
>
> Vale et valete,
>
> Ap.Galerius Aurelianus
> Tribunis Plebus
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67642 From: Gnaeus Iulius Caesar Date: 2009-06-20
Subject: Re: My Statement of Opposition to the Intercessio!
Cn Iulius Caesar Ap. Galerio Aureliano SPD

Yes I think so. The deadine was 8.29 pm Mountain Time or 4.29 am CET.

Optime vale

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Gnaeus Iulius Caesar" <gn_iulius_caesar@...> wrote:
>
> Cn Iulius Caesar Ap. Galerio Aureliano SPD
>
> I think you are just under one hour too late, aren't you? Time zones can be a tad confusing. I'll double check though.
>
> Optime vale
>
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Robert Levee <galerius_of_rome@> wrote:
> >
> >
> > Salve et salvete,
> >
> > As a Tribunis Plebus has three options in their decision making process. I am before you now, to render my stance,on the intercessio filed by my fellow Tribunis Plebus Agrippa.
> >
> > Of the three choices there is agreement,opposition and abstention.
> >
> > I am in complete opposition to this intercessio!
> >
> > I do not think I can make it any clearer than that.
> >
> > Vale et valete,
> >
> > Ap.Galerius Aurelianus
> > Tribunis Plebus
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67643 From: Robert Levee Date: 2009-06-20
Subject: Re: My Statement of Opposition to the Intercessio!
Salve,

Thank you Sir.

Vale,
Appius

--- On Sat, 6/20/09, Gnaeus Iulius Caesar <gn_iulius_caesar@...> wrote:

> From: Gnaeus Iulius Caesar <gn_iulius_caesar@...>
> Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: My Statement of Opposition to the Intercessio!
> To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> Date: Saturday, June 20, 2009, 11:40 PM
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Cn Iulius Caesar Ap. Galerio Aureliano SPD
>
>
>
> Yes I think so. The deadine was 8.29 pm Mountain Time or
> 4.29 am CET.
>
>
>
> Optime vale
>
>
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogrou
> ps.com, "Gnaeus Iulius Caesar"
> <gn_iulius_caesar@ ...> wrote:
>
> >
>
> > Cn Iulius Caesar Ap. Galerio Aureliano SPD
>
> >
>
> > I think you are just under one hour too late,
> aren't you? Time zones can be a tad confusing. I'll
> double check though.
>
> >
>
> > Optime vale
>
> >
>
> >
>
> > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogrou
> ps.com, Robert Levee <galerius_of_ rome@> wrote:
>
> > >
>
> > >
>
> > > Salve et salvete,
>
> > >
>
> > > As a Tribunis Plebus has three options in their
> decision making process. I am before you now, to render my
> stance,on the intercessio filed by my fellow Tribunis Plebus
> Agrippa.
>
> > >
>
> > > Of the three choices there is agreement,oppositio
> n and abstention.
>
> > >
>
> > > I am in complete opposition to this intercessio!
>
> > >
>
> > > I do not think I can make it any clearer than
> that.
>
> > >
>
> > > Vale et valete,
>
> > >
>
> > > Ap.Galerius Aurelianus
>
> > > Tribunis Plebus
>
> > >
>
> >
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67644 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2009-06-20
Subject: NR Identity a Fantasy Construct? (was: Re: nova roma is syncretic)
Cato Agricolae Gualterae omnibusque in foro SPD

Salvete.

I agree with the ideas presented by you here, Agricola, with one small caveat I think worth exploring, as it ties in with an earlier topic in the Forum.

While it may be quite true that "we have to distinguish between people expressing an opinion on terms and people insisting that every else agree to use those terms", there must be a mutually-agreed upon foundation for terminology in conversations in order to allow them to serve any useful purpose at all. My older brother, a chemical physicist, often jokes that 2+2=5 for sufficient values of "2" and "5" :)

This may be another pull in the direction of establishing - at least for us here in the Respublica - a set of definitions of terms we use, both in the legal sense and the general one. These definitions could, for example, consist of concepts adhering as closely as possible to the Roman Republic circa 330-190 BC.

This will not, of course, encompass the wildly variegated understandings that people have of any number of subjects, but at least it would be a step towards some - I hesitate to say "uniformity", but that's the idea - of thought.

If I may say, regarding my private cultus, I often answer odd and even absurd claims about it based on what it has accepted as its foundational, that is, orthodox, truths. While some extraordinarily different views have been held from time to time over the course of what some would call its historical development and others its gradual comprehension, I answer based on the terms understood after the rulings of the Seven Ecumenical Councils.

When a term from another religious tradition (and specifically the religio Romana) is discussed, to fully - or at least more comprehensively - understand it, it often must be weighed against the undestandings that people already have based on their knowledge of this kind of term. This does not mean that the previously-understood concept is superior or inferior to that of any other, only that things must be brought into focus based on the recognition that those concepts necessarily color our understanding.

When a term involving our legal process is involved, if we have a set of definitions at hand that are clear and concise and that agree fundamentally with each other, then situations like the current one could be minimized, if not eliminated.

Valete,

Cato
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67645 From: Gnaeus Iulius Caesar Date: 2009-06-20
Subject: Re: My Statement of Opposition to the Intercessio!
Cn. Iulius Caesar SPD.

Well, the intercessio survives. I await with interest the consular response.

Optime valete


--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Gnaeus Iulius Caesar" <gn_iulius_caesar@...> wrote:
>
> Cn Iulius Caesar Ap. Galerio Aureliano SPD
>
> Yes I think so. The deadine was 8.29 pm Mountain Time or 4.29 am CET.
>
> Optime vale
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67646 From: ellencatalina Date: 2009-06-21
Subject: Re: nova roma is syncretic
Salve

It would seem to me that heresy is a concepr based on "false belief". Most of the examples you have given here are based on improper practices.

So while the death of Soccrates would fall under the "false belief" catagory, the other examples do not. The cult of Baccus was accused of sodomy and conspiracy, etc. The Romans were orthopractic and they took the practices very seriously. If some one were to deliberately anger the gods they would have to be treated as anyone endagering the state would be treated.

Vale

Q. Iulia Cornuta

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Q. Valerius Poplicola" <q.valerius.poplicola@...> wrote:
>
> Poplicola Maiori:
>
> >> the Romans during the Republic did not have the concept of religious heretics.
>
> This charge is fallacious. Romans, like their Greek counterparts, were concerned with religious taboos and customs just as much as the Christians are with belief. Several points:
>
> Socrates was killed for atheism;
> Philosophers and Jews have both been expelled from Rome;
> the Bacchus cult was repressed;
> Lutatius Cerco was forbidden by the Senate from consulting the oracle of Fortuna at Praeneste - auspices had to be taken inside Rome.
>
> This is one point where you and I disagree over religion. One's personal, family cult is there own business, but it's outright false to suggest that the ancient had no concept of "heresy".
>
> Vale.
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Maior" <rory12001@> wrote:
> >
> > -Salvete;
> > I was speaking of all culti,Judaism, Zoroastrianism, Isis worshippers, Pythagoreans.
> >
> > the Romans during the Republic did not have the concept of religious heretics. During the Empire up to Constantine, which the religio here in Nova Roma follows, there wasn't such a concept. There are no heresies and no heretics in Nova Roma.
> >
> > It is alien to our culture, to the tolerant syncretic place Nova Roma is.
> >
> > Anyone who calls himself or herself a Christian, is one; gnostic christians, rc christians, orthodox christians, universalists are all equal here. The same if cives worship Isis, Yahweh, Odin, also atheists agnostics, philosophers!
> >
> > We have the state cultus deorum but for everything else:
> >
> > All are equal in Nova Roma! We are a liberal tolerant syncretic polytheistic organization.
> > valete
> > M.Hortensia Maior
> >
> >
> > > Salvete.
> > >
> > > An incorrect depiction has, once again, been given of my private cultus. "[D]uring the republic" there was no such thing as Christianity, as Christ had yet to be born; long before the end of the Western Empire Christianity had formulated itself in contrast to many various and sundry heresies - among them, Gnosticism.
> > >
> > > Valete,
> > >
> > > Cato
> > >
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67647 From: Steve Moore Date: 2009-06-21
Subject: Request for Image of a Seiugis

M. Valerius Potitus omnibus SPD.

 

I’m looking for an easily reproduceable image of a seiugis (six-horse chariot). Does anyone know of one?

 

Thanks in advance.

 

Valete.

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67648 From: n_apollonius_quadratus Date: 2009-06-21
Subject: Re: Digest Number 4586 - Some observations from the peanut gallery
N. Apollonius Quadratus M. Potito salutem plurimam dicit.

I didn't see the fact sheet offered by Cn. Caesar, but I would appreciate a link if you could offer it. Also the talking point of a poorly written law is how a lot of the USA operates. If the law is poorly written, the clear intent is not clear. I'm saying that Modianus is legally Censor because of a poorly written law. I like Modianus. I was able to talk to him, but I think his candidacy was very black hat. It skirted legality. Just because I think his candidacy was not really capable of being legal, it does not change the fact that because of the poorly written law, I can see no reason why his position of legality for Censor Suffectus is not applicable.

Now I do not have Imperium. The Consules and Praetors do. Because of the poorly written law, the Imperium can interpret Modianus' candidacy as legal because the stipulations of said law is too nebulas to prohibit his run for Censor Suffectus. I took the time to run this by a friend of mine, a lawyer, and because of the law and the internal powers vested into the Praetors and the Consules Modianus is legally Censor Suffectus. If a lawsuit would be issued it will not be a win for the opposing party. I recommend the opposing party begin the works of a better law, or more stringent clarification so the "abuse" of what the "clear intent" of the law truley is.

If I were Consul or Praetor I would have said Modianus candidacy was illegal if the law had been written "...consecutive and/or no more than two terms within a six year period." This is chronologically sound and prohibits the chance of a consecutive term by the wording, but allows Dictators to declare consecutive terms in dire circumstances. So, M. Potitus, while I look forward to the information Cn. Caesar offers, I must remain skeptical. Thank you for replying to my post though.

Vale.

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Steve Moore" <astrobear@...> wrote:
>
> M. Valerius Potitus N. Apollonio Quadrato SPD.
>
>
>
> Modianus is not legally censor, and this has been clearly explained by Cn.,
> Iulius Caesar.
>
>
>
> Furthermore, the talking point that this law is poorly written does not
> excuse breaking the law's clear intent.
>
>
>
> If you wonder what the clear intent is, please read the archives.
>
>
>
> Vale.
>
>
>
> _____
>
> From: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com [mailto:Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf
> Of n_apollonius_quadratus
> Sent: Saturday, June 20, 2009 3:14 PM
> To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Digest Number 4586 - Some observations from the
> peanut gallery
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> N. Apollonius Quadratus Andy omnibusque salvete.
>
> In general, this doesn't excuse the fact that Modianus is legally Censor.
> There is no legal loophole as it establishes a chronological impossibility
> if the service was to include consecutive as a basis for refusal to allow
> the candidate. The law is poorly written, and much posturing as of late is
> done to preform deeds I find unsavory. A part from that, yes there is far
> less Romanesque things being talked about as of late. So I think my next
> post to the ML will be Roman related. Hm.
>
> Valete.
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogrou <mailto:Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com> ps.com,
> "livia_plauta" <
>
>
>
>
> <http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma/message/67537;_ylc=X3oDMTM2ZTAwYXM4
> BF9TAzk3MzU5NzE0BGdycElkAzYyODgwMzkEZ3Jwc3BJZAMxNzA1MzEzNzEyBG1zZ0lkAzY3NjEy
> BHNlYwNmdHIEc2xrA3Z0cGMEc3RpbWUDMTI0NTUzOTg3OQR0cGNJZAM2NzUzNw--> Messages
> in this topic (7)
> <http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma/post;_ylc=X3oDMTJxOGQ1ZGJpBF9TAzk3M
> zU5NzE0BGdycElkAzYyODgwMzkEZ3Jwc3BJZAMxNzA1MzEzNzEyBG1zZ0lkAzY3NjEyBHNlYwNmd
> HIEc2xrA3JwbHkEc3RpbWUDMTI0NTUzOTg3OQ--?act=reply&messageNum=67612> Reply
> (via web post) |
> <http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma/post;_ylc=X3oDMTJldmNhZWlkBF9TAzk3M
> zU5NzE0BGdycElkAzYyODgwMzkEZ3Jwc3BJZAMxNzA1MzEzNzEyBHNlYwNmdHIEc2xrA250cGMEc
> 3RpbWUDMTI0NTUzOTg3OQ--> Start a new topic
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67649 From: n_apollonius_quadratus Date: 2009-06-21
Subject: Re: Digest Number 4586 - Some observations from the peanut gallery
N. Apollonius Quadratus Q. Poplicola salutem plurimam dicit.

I'm sorry, I'm having some trouble finding it. The ML does kind of get washed with posts rather fast. I'm still trying to find it, unless you already have it. I would appreciate a link, but I don't want to bother you. Thanks again for replying to that post, and when I find it, I will look forward to reading it.

On a side note, I just want to say I am truly neutral on the matter of Modianus candidacy. If the law was written differently, I would clearly have said his candidacy is wrong. I like Modianus, and he seems like a nice guy, though I wouldn't play scrabble with him. Apart from that, I do believe this certain election was extremely iffy and very legally uncomfortable. I recommend the powers that be rework that law so this doesn't happen again. Though, I would like to see what Cn. Caesar said, and your reply as well, Q. Poplicola. Thanks again for helping me get a better perspective of the affairs in Nova Roma.

Vale.

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Q. Valerius Poplicola" <q.valerius.poplicola@...> wrote:
>
> Did you ever read my post correcting your factually incorrect information? I'm curious if you read that because I have not seen you yet respond, although I may have missed it.
>
> Poplicola
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "n_apollonius_quadratus" <n_apollonius_quadratus@> wrote:
> >
> > N. Apollonius Quadratus Andy omnibusque salvete.
> >
> > In general, this doesn't excuse the fact that Modianus is legally Censor. There is no legal loophole as it establishes a chronological impossibility if the service was to include consecutive as a basis for refusal to allow the candidate. The law is poorly written, and much posturing as of late is done to preform deeds I find unsavory. A part from that, yes there is far less Romanesque things being talked about as of late. So I think my next post to the ML will be Roman related. Hm.
> >
> > Valete.
> >
> > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "livia_plauta" <livia.plauta@> wrote:
> > >
> > > Salve Andy,
> > > I wish some of the people here would take your advice. Unfortunately their aim seems to be to drive constructive people like you away. I seems they succeed in 95% of the cases.
> > > Then they complai because NR has few assidui.
> > >
> > > Vale
> > > Livia
> > >
> > > > potential benefits involved. Like Roman politics that much? Stop by a hobby shop, Reiner Knizia's game "Quo Vadis" and invite some friends over
> > > > for an evening of politicking and wine. You'll have more fun.
> > > >
> > > > Let's face it - if this were the real Roman Republic and/or people wanted to really resolve the recent NR problems "in the Roman way", one or both factions
> > > > would head down to the local gladiatorial school with a sack of denarii, hire a pack of goons and waylay their opponents on the road to Praeneste. Anyone
> > > > familiar with the Gracchi brothers, Sullan proscriptions, Catilinian conspiracy or the civil wars knows this. So, when one or the other side lays claim to
> > > > doing things "in the Roman way", let's face it this is a more civilized age and noone here is doing things as the Romans themselves would have.
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67650 From: Q. Valerius Poplicola Date: 2009-06-21
Subject: Re: nova roma is syncretic
To be able to claim that is a form of orthodoxy. You're absolutely right that the Romans were all about doing things correctly (orthopraxy), but that also is a state of mind to. Seneca, perhaps more than anyone, focused on that, but not him alone. Someone else here mentioned Pythagoras' quote about thinking good even when alone.

While it is true that there are no formal creeds per se, there was orthodoxy, otherwise orthopraxy cannot as a rule exist. I said this to Maior (who completely ignored the point) - how can you do things correctly if you're not taught correct things about them? And if all it takes to appease Iuppiter is sacrificing and not actually believing in him, doesn't it make a mockery of pietas, that virtue of virtues? Seems antithetical to me.

We simply don't have anyone going around Rome shouting loudly "The Gods don't exist!", and the groups that said that only their One God exist (Jews, Christians) experienced wars and persecutions throughout their interaction with Greeks and Romans.

Poplicola

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "ellencatalina" <ellencatalina@...> wrote:
>
> Salve
>
> It would seem to me that heresy is a concepr based on "false belief". Most of the examples you have given here are based on improper practices.
>
> So while the death of Soccrates would fall under the "false belief" catagory, the other examples do not. The cult of Baccus was accused of sodomy and conspiracy, etc. The Romans were orthopractic and they took the practices very seriously. If some one were to deliberately anger the gods they would have to be treated as anyone endagering the state would be treated.
>
> Vale
>
> Q. Iulia Cornuta
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Q. Valerius Poplicola" <q.valerius.poplicola@> wrote:
> >
> > Poplicola Maiori:
> >
> > >> the Romans during the Republic did not have the concept of religious heretics.
> >
> > This charge is fallacious. Romans, like their Greek counterparts, were concerned with religious taboos and customs just as much as the Christians are with belief. Several points:
> >
> > Socrates was killed for atheism;
> > Philosophers and Jews have both been expelled from Rome;
> > the Bacchus cult was repressed;
> > Lutatius Cerco was forbidden by the Senate from consulting the oracle of Fortuna at Praeneste - auspices had to be taken inside Rome.
> >
> > This is one point where you and I disagree over religion. One's personal, family cult is there own business, but it's outright false to suggest that the ancient had no concept of "heresy".
> >
> > Vale.
> >
> > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Maior" <rory12001@> wrote:
> > >
> > > -Salvete;
> > > I was speaking of all culti,Judaism, Zoroastrianism, Isis worshippers, Pythagoreans.
> > >
> > > the Romans during the Republic did not have the concept of religious heretics. During the Empire up to Constantine, which the religio here in Nova Roma follows, there wasn't such a concept. There are no heresies and no heretics in Nova Roma.
> > >
> > > It is alien to our culture, to the tolerant syncretic place Nova Roma is.
> > >
> > > Anyone who calls himself or herself a Christian, is one; gnostic christians, rc christians, orthodox christians, universalists are all equal here. The same if cives worship Isis, Yahweh, Odin, also atheists agnostics, philosophers!
> > >
> > > We have the state cultus deorum but for everything else:
> > >
> > > All are equal in Nova Roma! We are a liberal tolerant syncretic polytheistic organization.
> > > valete
> > > M.Hortensia Maior
> > >
> > >
> > > > Salvete.
> > > >
> > > > An incorrect depiction has, once again, been given of my private cultus. "[D]uring the republic" there was no such thing as Christianity, as Christ had yet to be born; long before the end of the Western Empire Christianity had formulated itself in contrast to many various and sundry heresies - among them, Gnosticism.
> > > >
> > > > Valete,
> > > >
> > > > Cato
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67651 From: gualterus_graecus Date: 2009-06-21
Subject: NR Identity a Fantasy Construct? (was: Re: nova roma is syncretic)
Salve Agricola,

While I can sympathize with the desire that "we have opposition to the notion that the Christian rhetoric, or any specific rhetoric, is the only correct view", the problem lies in the notion of orthodox self-definition. For orthodox (small 'o') Christian identity, having the claim to the correct view is essential. To force them to express themselves otherwise does violence to their own religious identity. Moreover, to chastise them for this (as I have seen some do) in an organization that embraces the first four centuries of Christian history is inconsistent at best and speaks to the deep structural issues that we have.

As for orthodoxy/orthopraxy, I agree that it may not always be the best way of understanding, but virtually everything we say about ancient Rome is through some type of modern construct. So long as we use them judiciously and also offer some flexibility in understanding when others employ them, I think orthopraxy/orthodoxy can be a useful pair of abstractions. I think one way in doing this is if someone disagrees with their employment in a particular context, the responder can employ a rewording reflecting what the original post may have intended, adding to it what are seen as the proper nuances. In other words, one should move the discussion to what is seen as the proper level of abstraction instead of jumping off the boat when someone enters a discussion at a different level than what someone else may have desired or expected. I think this sort of conciliatory approach is especially important when terms/constructs are employed that are still current in scholarship.

Vale,

Gualterus

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "M. Lucretius Agricola" <marcus.lucretius@...> wrote:
>
> Agricola Graeco sal,
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "gualterus_graecus" <waltms1@> wrote:
> >
> >
> > I know this is an old topic, however, its ghost still haunts us left and right as seen in the various comments about the Republic, syncretism, opposition to Christian rhetoric while also pretending to being inclusive and it demands some deep structural adjustments within NR.
> >
> > Valete,
> >
> > Gualterus
> >
>
> I have just a moment to dip in...
>
> I don't think we have "opposition to Christian rhetoric" as much as we have opposition to the notion that the Christian rhetoric, or any specific rhetoric, is the only correct view. We should welcome not only polytheism, but multiculturalism and a variety of viewpoints, and a more sophisticated methodology.
>
> To take the specific example at hand, the "praxy/doxy" axis is one way of understanding, but not the only one and it may not be the best one for all parties. Any axis of this sort is a mental construction, and as such it may encode certain biases. It is perfectly acceptable, I think, for members of specific community to claim that such axes do not capture the realities that they see and experience. Just because from one viewpoint a set of behaviors can be made to fit within a construct does not mean that the construct is either real or has exclusive validity.
>
> Not to put too fine a point on it, this means that we have to distinguish between people expressing an opinion on terms and people insisting that every else agree to use those terms.
>
> Also, I am in complete agreement with your assessment regarding the use of the polar pairs, that in reality the extremes are seldom if ever populated. The use of the ends of an axis as exclusive polar opposites is one of the problems with framing discussion in these terms. As a methodology these axes have some use as a starting point, but in the end they may be more limiting than useful.
>
> Finally, I think that this sort of discussion is essential to your point about "deep structural adjustments". In my view we have to move not to a different position, but to a more sophisticated view of the positions we have.
>
> Thank you for an interesting discussion.
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67652 From: Q. Valerius Poplicola Date: 2009-06-21
Subject: Re: Digest Number 4586 - Some observations from the peanut gallery
You can just ignore the PS on the last email. I had not heard from you. The political atmosphere made this way by a couple of posters and their respondents have made me a little on the weary side. I'm glad to see that you're actually interested.

Here's the post:

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma/message/67183

All the best,

Poplicola

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "n_apollonius_quadratus" <n_apollonius_quadratus@...> wrote:
>
> N. Apollonius Quadratus Q. Poplicola salutem plurimam dicit.
>
> I'm sorry, I'm having some trouble finding it. The ML does kind of get washed with posts rather fast. I'm still trying to find it, unless you already have it. I would appreciate a link, but I don't want to bother you. Thanks again for replying to that post, and when I find it, I will look forward to reading it.
>
> On a side note, I just want to say I am truly neutral on the matter of Modianus candidacy. If the law was written differently, I would clearly have said his candidacy is wrong. I like Modianus, and he seems like a nice guy, though I wouldn't play scrabble with him. Apart from that, I do believe this certain election was extremely iffy and very legally uncomfortable. I recommend the powers that be rework that law so this doesn't happen again. Though, I would like to see what Cn. Caesar said, and your reply as well, Q. Poplicola. Thanks again for helping me get a better perspective of the affairs in Nova Roma.
>
> Vale.
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Q. Valerius Poplicola" <q.valerius.poplicola@> wrote:
> >
> > Did you ever read my post correcting your factually incorrect information? I'm curious if you read that because I have not seen you yet respond, although I may have missed it.
> >
> > Poplicola
> >
> > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "n_apollonius_quadratus" <n_apollonius_quadratus@> wrote:
> > >
> > > N. Apollonius Quadratus Andy omnibusque salvete.
> > >
> > > In general, this doesn't excuse the fact that Modianus is legally Censor. There is no legal loophole as it establishes a chronological impossibility if the service was to include consecutive as a basis for refusal to allow the candidate. The law is poorly written, and much posturing as of late is done to preform deeds I find unsavory. A part from that, yes there is far less Romanesque things being talked about as of late. So I think my next post to the ML will be Roman related. Hm.
> > >
> > > Valete.
> > >
> > > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "livia_plauta" <livia.plauta@> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Salve Andy,
> > > > I wish some of the people here would take your advice. Unfortunately their aim seems to be to drive constructive people like you away. I seems they succeed in 95% of the cases.
> > > > Then they complai because NR has few assidui.
> > > >
> > > > Vale
> > > > Livia
> > > >
> > > > > potential benefits involved. Like Roman politics that much? Stop by a hobby shop, Reiner Knizia's game "Quo Vadis" and invite some friends over
> > > > > for an evening of politicking and wine. You'll have more fun.
> > > > >
> > > > > Let's face it - if this were the real Roman Republic and/or people wanted to really resolve the recent NR problems "in the Roman way", one or both factions
> > > > > would head down to the local gladiatorial school with a sack of denarii, hire a pack of goons and waylay their opponents on the road to Praeneste. Anyone
> > > > > familiar with the Gracchi brothers, Sullan proscriptions, Catilinian conspiracy or the civil wars knows this. So, when one or the other side lays claim to
> > > > > doing things "in the Roman way", let's face it this is a more civilized age and noone here is doing things as the Romans themselves would have.
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67653 From: Timothy or Stephen Gallagher Date: 2009-06-21
Subject: Misogynistic?
Salve Maior
 
"I've had those posts from Poplicola, Cato, Paulinus, just recently."
 
Please show me where I have done this recently or ever.
 
Maior you are a Nova Roman politician and a member of the Senate. The fact that you are also a women means nothing to me when we are having our disagreements. The fact that you support TPTB without question and on every issue does.
 
Vale
 
Paulinus

 



To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
From: rory12001@...
Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2009 22:26:18 +0000
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Protecting Our Votes and Future Elections




Salve Valeria Messalina;
it has been noted and not by a female either, that there is a distincly misogynistic tone used by some against the Nova Roman women who speak up. Sexist and dismissive. I've had those posts from Poplicola, Cato, Paulinus, just recently.
It's rude and has no place in Nova Roma, and no sexism isn't 'mos'. I've heard that old argument done to death..
bene vale
Maior

> Sir, I do not need your permission or your approval as to how I sign or do not sign my posts, thank you.
>
>
> <<Learn how the game was played (politica games of power) use the tools the romans did; and learn to take those consequences the good and the bad.>>
>  
> In fact, I urge all the women of Nova Roma to speak their minds when they so feel the need to do so on any issue. Whether I agree with their views or not, I will always support the right of all Nova Roman women to speak up, Vestals included.
>  
> Maxima Valeria Messallina
> Sacerdos Vestalis
>


Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67654 From: n_apollonius_quadratus Date: 2009-06-21
Subject: Hm, Roman stuff...
Omnibus Salvete.

So I promised my next post was going to be Roman, and I promised Maior that it would be something that I do...so I'll try.

I have no idea what to talk about. Some of the things I do, well I teach Pankration, weapons combat, Roman diets and cooking, and every now and then Roman construction (though getting limestone tends to be a pain in the hind quarters where I'm at). I teach Greco-Roman wrestling and Roman boxing. Fun thing to consider, Alexander the Great reached India and his men did a lot of hand to hand combat. The irony of the situation is there is ample archaeological and written evidence to support that Alexander's soldiers may have started the martial arts in the east. Pankration moves may have actually be what started Judo, but it's one of those we really can't tell sort of situations.

When I have one of my teaching sessions, I have my Romans go on a good ol Roman diet. When we march sometimes in southern Idaho, I have them eat Hardtac, because I'm a jerk like that. Though at night when we sit for some good ol minutal marinum with, you guessed it, hardtac and grape wine, it kind of helps put that final staple in a hard days work. During the day I usually have them eat apples or something easy to carry. What else, other Romanesque like thing. Well I don't have my men train naked, and I do allow women to train.

I make my own swords, but I have wooden swords and heavily padded bats for pair drills. We use a lot of body weight exercises or natural lifting. Natural lifting as in rocks, logs, or people.

What else, so hard to talk about stuff. Well I guess that's it for now. If I think of anything, or if you have a fantastically Roman thing you do, I would love to hear about it.

Valete.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67655 From: gualterus_graecus Date: 2009-06-21
Subject: Re: nova roma is syncretic
Salve Cornuta,

I think Poplicola was trying to use the term "heresy" in a broader sense which includes taboo.

Vale,

Gualterus

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "ellencatalina" <ellencatalina@...> wrote:
>
> Salve
>
> It would seem to me that heresy is a concepr based on "false belief". Most of the examples you have given here are based on improper practices.
>
> So while the death of Soccrates would fall under the "false belief" catagory, the other examples do not. The cult of Baccus was accused of sodomy and conspiracy, etc. The Romans were orthopractic and they took the practices very seriously. If some one were to deliberately anger the gods they would have to be treated as anyone endagering the state would be treated.
>
> Vale
>
> Q. Iulia Cornuta
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Q. Valerius Poplicola" <q.valerius.poplicola@> wrote:
> >
> > Poplicola Maiori:
> >
> > >> the Romans during the Republic did not have the concept of religious heretics.
> >
> > This charge is fallacious. Romans, like their Greek counterparts, were concerned with religious taboos and customs just as much as the Christians are with belief. Several points:
> >
> > Socrates was killed for atheism;
> > Philosophers and Jews have both been expelled from Rome;
> > the Bacchus cult was repressed;
> > Lutatius Cerco was forbidden by the Senate from consulting the oracle of Fortuna at Praeneste - auspices had to be taken inside Rome.
> >
> > This is one point where you and I disagree over religion. One's personal, family cult is there own business, but it's outright false to suggest that the ancient had no concept of "heresy".
> >
> > Vale.
> >
> > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Maior" <rory12001@> wrote:
> > >
> > > -Salvete;
> > > I was speaking of all culti,Judaism, Zoroastrianism, Isis worshippers, Pythagoreans.
> > >
> > > the Romans during the Republic did not have the concept of religious heretics. During the Empire up to Constantine, which the religio here in Nova Roma follows, there wasn't such a concept. There are no heresies and no heretics in Nova Roma.
> > >
> > > It is alien to our culture, to the tolerant syncretic place Nova Roma is.
> > >
> > > Anyone who calls himself or herself a Christian, is one; gnostic christians, rc christians, orthodox christians, universalists are all equal here. The same if cives worship Isis, Yahweh, Odin, also atheists agnostics, philosophers!
> > >
> > > We have the state cultus deorum but for everything else:
> > >
> > > All are equal in Nova Roma! We are a liberal tolerant syncretic polytheistic organization.
> > > valete
> > > M.Hortensia Maior
> > >
> > >
> > > > Salvete.
> > > >
> > > > An incorrect depiction has, once again, been given of my private cultus. "[D]uring the republic" there was no such thing as Christianity, as Christ had yet to be born; long before the end of the Western Empire Christianity had formulated itself in contrast to many various and sundry heresies - among them, Gnosticism.
> > > >
> > > > Valete,
> > > >
> > > > Cato
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67656 From: wuffa2001 Date: 2009-06-21
Subject: Re: Protecting Our Votes and Future Elections
--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, violetphearsen@... wrote:
>


If you going to talk on politically thorny issues
you have given the OK to use roman politica game "tricks"
deal
mud
DEAL
it is a game the romans paly and i see you in fact do not get it and so your not roman?
fine







> <<--- On Fri, 6/19/09, wuffa2001 <magewuffa@...> wrote:
> If you're going to say anything in this Forum about any politically thorny issue the people may use all the old roman debate tricks of the trade on you!>>
>  
> I am not debating with anybody. Tricks? Ah, so you were using a "trick". Since I do not use "tricks", I did not recognize your use of "tricks". Thank you for explaining to me that you employ "tricks". Citizens of Nova Roma, we have now been warned.
>
>  
> <<With all due respect, if your going to talk politics you going to have mud. And you should expect to be muddied.>>
>  
> I completely disagree. I think we can discuss political issues without the "mud".
>  
>
> <<If you would stop trying to use your priestly office for politically ends and stop using the words like all the gods think this or that. Then, you will not be muddied. However you think you can have your cake and eat it too, that is not so.>>
>  
> You are in total error, sir. I have never used my sacred office for political ends of any kind. I have no political aspirations of any sort and I have already said so on this list. When I was offered a seat in the Senate, I respectfully declined it.
> I did not say anything about the Gods in my post. I did once before in a post some time ago and I was kindly corrected by one of our esteemed Pontifices.
>
>
> <<Stay clear of the politically thorny issue and I will have a lot more respect for you and your office.>>
>  
> Many Vestals spoke their minds on the issues of their day and no one ever told them to "stay clear" of any issue. If you find you cannot respect me for speaking my mind, that is your own affair, but regardless of what you think of me, respect for the sacred office of the Vestals should be viewed apart from your own feelings towards any one Vestal in particular. 
>
> <<,If you want to talk about any politically thorny issue do so without any office at the signoff and you and i will get along just fine anyone who uses there priestly office for politically power and uses as badly as you have done does not have my respect.>>
>  
> Sir, I do not need your permission or your approval as to how I sign or do not sign my posts, thank you.
>
>
> <<Learn how the game was played (politica games of power) use the tools the romans did; and learn to take those consequences the good and the bad.>>
>  
> Games? I do not play "games" of any sort, not with anyone. I speak my mind on occasion and when I do, I state the truth as I see it. Some may agree with me and some may not. I have no problem with that, but I do have a problem with any man who presumes to tell me when I can comment and when I cannot. Just because I became a Vestal does not mean I gave up my right to speak up when I feel impelled to do so, and on any issue, political or otherwise. In fact, I urge all the women of Nova Roma to speak their minds when they so feel the need to do so on any issue. Whether I agree with their views or not, I will always support the right of all Nova Roman women to speak up, Vestals included.
>  
> Maxima Valeria Messallina
> Sacerdos Vestalis
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67657 From: Steve Moore Date: 2009-06-21
Subject: Re: Digest Number 4586 - Some observations from the peanut gallery

Potitus Quadrato SPD.

 

For Caesar’s many explanations, please see the archives of this list, beginning with message 65153 on May 13.

 

Vale.

 


From: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com [mailto: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com ] On Behalf Of n_apollonius_quadratus
Sent: Saturday, June 20, 2009 9:33 PM
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Digest Number 4586 - Some observations from the peanut gallery

 




N. Apollonius Quadratus M. Potito salutem plurimam dicit.

I didn't see the fact sheet offered by Cn. Caesar, but I would appreciate a link if you could offer it. Also the talking point of a poorly written law is how a lot of the USA operates. If the law is poorly written, the clear intent is not clear. I'm saying that Modianus is legally Censor because of a poorly written law. I like Modianus. I was able to talk to him, but I think his candidacy was very black hat. It skirted legality. Just because I think his candidacy was not really capable of being legal, it does not change the fact that because of the poorly written law, I can see no reason why his position of legality for Censor Suffectus is not applicable.

Now I do not have Imperium. The Consules and Praetors do. Because of the poorly written law, the Imperium can interpret Modianus' candidacy as legal because the stipulations of said law is too nebulas to prohibit his run for Censor Suffectus. I took the time to run this by a friend of mine, a lawyer, and because of the law and the internal powers vested into the Praetors and the Consules Modianus is legally Censor Suffectus. If a lawsuit would be issued it will not be a win for the opposing party. I recommend the opposing party begin the works of a better law, or more stringent clarification so the "abuse" of what the "clear intent" of the law truley is.

If I were Consul or Praetor I would have said Modianus candidacy was illegal if the law had been written "...consecutive and/or no more than two terms within a six year period." This is chronologically sound and prohibits the chance of a consecutive term by the wording, but allows Dictators to declare consecutive terms in dire circumstances. So, M. Potitus, while I look forward to the information Cn. Caesar offers, I must remain skeptical. Thank you for replying to my post though.

Vale.

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com, "Steve Moore" <astrobear@. ..> wrote:

>
> M. Valerius Potitus N. Apollonio Quadrato SPD.
>
>
>
> Modianus is not legally censor, and this has been clearly explained by
Cn.,
> Iulius Caesar.
>
>
>
> Furthermore, the talking point that this law is poorly written does not
> excuse breaking the law's clear intent.
>
>
>
> If you wonder what the clear intent is, please read the archives.
>
>
>
> Vale.
>
>
>
> _____
>
> From: Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com
[mailto:Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com] On Behalf
> Of n_apollonius_ quadratus
> Sent: Saturday, June 20, 2009 3:14 PM
> To: Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com
> Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Digest Number 4586 - Some observations from the
> peanut gallery
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> N. Apollonius Quadratus Andy omnibusque salvete.
>
> In general, this doesn't excuse the fact that Modianus is legally Censor.
> There is no legal loophole as it establishes a chronological impossibility
> if the service was to include consecutive as a basis for refusal to allow
> the candidate. The law is poorly written, and much posturing as of late is
> done to preform deeds I find unsavory. A part from that, yes there is far
> less Romanesque things being talked about as of late. So I think my next
> post to the ML will be Roman related. Hm.
>
> Valete.
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogrou <mailto:Nova- Roma%40yahoogrou ps.com>
ps.com,
> "livia_plauta" <
>
>
>
>
> <
href="http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma/message/67537;_ylc=X3oDMTM2ZTAwYXM4">http://groups. yahoo.com/ group/Nova- Roma/message/ 67537;_ylc= X3oDMTM2ZTAwYXM4
> BF9TAzk3MzU5NzE0BGd ycElkAzYyODgwMzk EZ3Jwc3BJZAMxNzA 1MzEzNzEyBG1zZ0l kAzY3NjEy
> BHNlYwNmdHIEc2xrA3Z 0cGMEc3RpbWUDMTI 0NTUzOTg3OQR0cGN JZAM2NzUzNw- ->
Messages
> in this topic (7)
> <
href="http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma/post;_ylc=X3oDMTJxOGQ1ZGJpBF9TAzk3M">http://groups. yahoo.com/ group/Nova- Roma/post; _ylc=X3oDMTJxOGQ 1ZGJpBF9TAzk3M
> zU5NzE0BGdycElkAzYy ODgwMzkEZ3Jwc3BJ ZAMxNzA1MzEzNzEy BG1zZ0lkAzY3NjEy BHNlYwNmd
> HIEc2xrA3JwbHkEc3Rp bWUDMTI0NTUzOTg3 OQ--?act= reply&messageNum =67612>
Reply
> (via web post) |
> <
href="http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma/post;_ylc=X3oDMTJldmNhZWlkBF9TAzk3M">http://groups. yahoo.com/ group/Nova- Roma/post; _ylc=X3oDMTJldmN hZWlkBF9TAzk3M
> zU5NzE0BGdycElkAzYy ODgwMzkEZ3Jwc3BJ ZAMxNzA1MzEzNzEy BHNlYwNmdHIEc2xr A250cGMEc
> 3RpbWUDMTI0NTUzOTg3 OQ--> Start a new topic
>

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67658 From: gualterus_graecus Date: 2009-06-21
Subject: Call for Papers
Salvete!

This is your friendly weekly/monthly reminder that I'm accepting article submissions for my recon journal project. The working title of the journal is "Journal of Ancient Mediterranean Reconstructionism". Topics can be on any aspect of ancient life that does or may impact reconstructionist efforts. The scope involves the entire ancient Mediterranean and lands that have fallen under the influence of cultures therefrom. This offers a fair amount of flexibility given the extent of the Hellenistic kingdoms and Roman Empire. You can contact me at: waltms1 (at) yahoo (dot) com.

Types of submissions:

Regular article: 10+ pages (although, something around 20 pages or more is encouraged).

Short article/note: 1-9 pages. Tackles some narrow issue and probably easier to write for those who aren't familiar with a sufficient amount of secondary literature for writing a regular article.

review article: a well informed review of a book or long article.

The topics can be historical, philological, anthropological or practical in orientation. Examples: A study of how Roman law developed into Ius Commune and what this might say about modern adaptations of Roman law (historical); a fresh translation and edition of a Latin, Greek, etc prayer accompanied by linguistic and historical commentary (philological); the psychology of religious reconstructionism, comparing and contrasting it with more eclectic efforts (anthropological); a new take on substitutions for ingredients in neo-Roman cuisine (practical).

All articles must be scholarly in nature, taking into account the relevant primary and secondary literature on the subject. All sources must be properly cited. The style to be used is the Chicago Manual of Style (http://www.chicagomanualofstyle.org/tools_citationguide.html).

I'm also still looking to expand the group of referees. If you have a master's (MA/MPhil/qualifying Licentiate--if the L. was 5-6 years with a thesis, it counts) or PhD in Classics or a related field and would be willing to referee blinded copies of articles, please let me know!

Any suggestions/comments on any of the above are welcome!

Valete,

M. Cornelius Gualterus Graecus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67659 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2009-06-21
Subject: Re: Venator, future, Censorial candidacy
Re: [Nova-Roma] Venator, future, Censorial candidacy

  A. Tullia Scholastica P. Ullerio Venatori quiritibus bonae voluntatis S.P.D.

  

Avete omnes;

Just wanted an attention grabbing headline there ;-)


    ATS:  Probably you got the attention of some at least...nails gnawed to the quick, beads of sweat pouring down...

Just a counterpoint to a mention that I demurred due to my
"frailty"...my health is improving; both physically and mentally.  The
checkup I had on my heart and pacemaker 2 weeks ago showed that the
device is firing off about 6% of the time now, as opposed to above 10%
a few weeks after implantation.  I am still having some episodes of
rapid heart rate, but that too has diminished; a peak of 180 BPM this
past 6 months as opposed to 214 BPM during the prior period.  As to
the lengthy bouts of 102F+ fevers and abdominal pains I had from early
February until mid May, looks like it was my body's reaction to
"stones in the water pipes."

With the betterment of the physical side of things, I find that I am
having fewer and milder bouts of the depression with which I was
diagnosed a little over 4 years ago.  I have also been able to keep
from inflicting "brown bottle flu" upon myself the past year or so.

Folks, having physical or mental trouble is natural.  Their affecting
your life, your energy levels, interests, reactions, actions and other
such is also natural.  My doctors say that the biggest thing I have
going for me is my ability to admit that the problems exists, and
getting myself to help (albeit slowly sometimes [Abruzzese
stubbornness from my grandfather ;-]).

    ATS:  I am delighted that you are feeling better and that your doctor seems to agree that you are doing better.  Indeed, the ability to admit that something is wrong and asking for help are very important first steps...and in my experience at least, much harder for members of your sex than mine.  Too many of the male persuasion are unwilling to admit that they are less than perfect in any respect, including their health, just as too many doctors are willing to admit that when we women say something is wrong with our health, it is NOT a figment of our imaginations, or one of hysteria, in the original, old-fashioned sense of being due to our reproductive tract acting something like the Symplegades.  Very few of us have wandering uteri, let alone clashing ones...

This little break I'm taking from anything official is a necessity.  I
 do skim all the posts, but only home in on some few key phrases or
words, hence, this note.

I won't be candidate for Censor, in the foreseeable future, due to
lack of knowledge, time, and desire.  It is an important post, one
that calls for someone with all the above, though I think I again
cultivating the abundance of the patience and neutrality I think the
job also requires.

    ATS:  Certain gentlemen heave deep sighs of relief...

My thanks to those who put my name forward, even as a segment of an
arguement.  I am grateful for the favorable opinion of others.

    ATS:  I think that you have many of the qualities desirable in a censor, though your considerable poetic talents would be wasted in that land of bureaucracy, the censors’ office...

Valete - Venator the restful
  
    Vale, et valete.  

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67660 From: n_apollonius_quadratus Date: 2009-06-21
Subject: Re: Digest Number 4586 - Some observations from the peanut gallery
N. Apollonius Quadratus Q. Poplicola salutem plurimam dicit.

I see the post now, wow that was a long ways up the list of wonder. I understand that the original Intercessio was regarding the veto verification itself, i. e. We say Modianus is Censor, I call Intercessio to that claim. Is that right? The premise being that Modianus is an illegal candidate. That's my contention, Modianus isn't an illegal candidate because of a poorly written law. Saying the law is poorly written and not being a valid argument IS (capitalized for emphasis not yelling) a valid argument. Saying this was not the intent of the law does not change the fact that it was still worded in a way that Modianus should be legally considered Censor. Now, like I said, I like Modianus and I wouldn't mind hanging out with him one day, but ethically speaking this was really black hat tactics and is questionable. Doesn't change the legality of it. It was legally uncomfortable, but not illegal. That's why I don't think the original Intercessio is valid because Modianus is a legal candidate. Now, since I don't have Imperium, this is clearly my opinion, and shouldn't be taken worth a spit.

My opinion is Modianus is a legal candidate based on a poorly written law, but I'm in no position to question nor accuse or anything. As a non-tax paying citizen I really don't have much say. So whatever happens happens and I will keep my attention on this to when I do become a tax paying citizen next month. So I'm not trying to be antagonistic or butt heads, Q. Poplicola, I'm just commenting from my perspective. Realistically, if I was running for office and I had a consecutive term lined up, I would have exploited the same law. I'm pretty cut throat like, if there's an opening I take it. I guess I'm that bad kid down the street that said, "If they didn't want me to laugh at them they shouldn't have gotten out of bed this morning." Now I just need to find Cn. Caesar's post.

Vale.

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Q. Valerius Poplicola" <q.valerius.poplicola@...> wrote:
>
> You can just ignore the PS on the last email. I had not heard from you. The political atmosphere made this way by a couple of posters and their respondents have made me a little on the weary side. I'm glad to see that you're actually interested.
>
> Here's the post:
>
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma/message/67183
>
> All the best,
>
> Poplicola
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "n_apollonius_quadratus" <n_apollonius_quadratus@> wrote:
> >
> > N. Apollonius Quadratus Q. Poplicola salutem plurimam dicit.
> >
> > I'm sorry, I'm having some trouble finding it. The ML does kind of get washed with posts rather fast. I'm still trying to find it, unless you already have it. I would appreciate a link, but I don't want to bother you. Thanks again for replying to that post, and when I find it, I will look forward to reading it.
> >
> > On a side note, I just want to say I am truly neutral on the matter of Modianus candidacy. If the law was written differently, I would clearly have said his candidacy is wrong. I like Modianus, and he seems like a nice guy, though I wouldn't play scrabble with him. Apart from that, I do believe this certain election was extremely iffy and very legally uncomfortable. I recommend the powers that be rework that law so this doesn't happen again. Though, I would like to see what Cn. Caesar said, and your reply as well, Q. Poplicola. Thanks again for helping me get a better perspective of the affairs in Nova Roma.
> >
> > Vale.
> >
> > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Q. Valerius Poplicola" <q.valerius.poplicola@> wrote:
> > >
> > > Did you ever read my post correcting your factually incorrect information? I'm curious if you read that because I have not seen you yet respond, although I may have missed it.
> > >
> > > Poplicola
> > >
> > > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "n_apollonius_quadratus" <n_apollonius_quadratus@> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > N. Apollonius Quadratus Andy omnibusque salvete.
> > > >
> > > > In general, this doesn't excuse the fact that Modianus is legally Censor. There is no legal loophole as it establishes a chronological impossibility if the service was to include consecutive as a basis for refusal to allow the candidate. The law is poorly written, and much posturing as of late is done to preform deeds I find unsavory. A part from that, yes there is far less Romanesque things being talked about as of late. So I think my next post to the ML will be Roman related. Hm.
> > > >
> > > > Valete.
> > > >
> > > > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "livia_plauta" <livia.plauta@> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Salve Andy,
> > > > > I wish some of the people here would take your advice. Unfortunately their aim seems to be to drive constructive people like you away. I seems they succeed in 95% of the cases.
> > > > > Then they complai because NR has few assidui.
> > > > >
> > > > > Vale
> > > > > Livia
> > > > >
> > > > > > potential benefits involved. Like Roman politics that much? Stop by a hobby shop, Reiner Knizia's game "Quo Vadis" and invite some friends over
> > > > > > for an evening of politicking and wine. You'll have more fun.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Let's face it - if this were the real Roman Republic and/or people wanted to really resolve the recent NR problems "in the Roman way", one or both factions
> > > > > > would head down to the local gladiatorial school with a sack of denarii, hire a pack of goons and waylay their opponents on the road to Praeneste. Anyone
> > > > > > familiar with the Gracchi brothers, Sullan proscriptions, Catilinian conspiracy or the civil wars knows this. So, when one or the other side lays claim to
> > > > > > doing things "in the Roman way", let's face it this is a more civilized age and noone here is doing things as the Romans themselves would have.
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67661 From: n_apollonius_quadratus Date: 2009-06-21
Subject: Re: Protecting Our Votes and Future Elections
Omnibus salvete.

I'm sorry but I must disagree. While games of intrigue and politicking have their moments of entertainment, serious political struggles and issues need serious effort and straight forward talking. "Playing the game" or using "tricks" do not lend to credibility nor help the situation other than tarnish a person's character. While I do respect your decision to use such tactics for political aims, I do not agree with them. For me, it would be Deal Mud ignore. I would listen to the information given but any Ad Hominum attacks or other such logical fallacies directed at me would be ignored. I'm not that entertaining in the political arena I'm afraid.

Either way, being straight forward is just as Roman as subterfuge.

Valete.

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "wuffa2001" <magewuffa@...> wrote:
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, violetphearsen@ wrote:
> >
>
>
> If you going to talk on politically thorny issues
> you have given the OK to use roman politica game "tricks"
> deal
> mud
> DEAL
> it is a game the romans paly and i see you in fact do not get it and so your not roman?
> fine
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > <<--- On Fri, 6/19/09, wuffa2001 <magewuffa@> wrote:
> > If you're going to say anything in this Forum about any politically thorny issue the people may use all the old roman debate tricks of the trade on you!>>
> >  
> > I am not debating with anybody. Tricks? Ah, so you were using a "trick". Since I do not use "tricks", I did not recognize your use of "tricks". Thank you for explaining to me that you employ "tricks". Citizens of Nova Roma, we have now been warned.
> >
> >  
> > <<With all due respect, if your going to talk politics you going to have mud. And you should expect to be muddied.>>
> >  
> > I completely disagree. I think we can discuss political issues without the "mud".
> >  
> >
> > <<If you would stop trying to use your priestly office for politically ends and stop using the words like all the gods think this or that. Then, you will not be muddied. However you think you can have your cake and eat it too, that is not so.>>
> >  
> > You are in total error, sir. I have never used my sacred office for political ends of any kind. I have no political aspirations of any sort and I have already said so on this list. When I was offered a seat in the Senate, I respectfully declined it.
> > I did not say anything about the Gods in my post. I did once before in a post some time ago and I was kindly corrected by one of our esteemed Pontifices.
> >
> >
> > <<Stay clear of the politically thorny issue and I will have a lot more respect for you and your office.>>
> >  
> > Many Vestals spoke their minds on the issues of their day and no one ever told them to "stay clear" of any issue. If you find you cannot respect me for speaking my mind, that is your own affair, but regardless of what you think of me, respect for the sacred office of the Vestals should be viewed apart from your own feelings towards any one Vestal in particular. 
> >
> > <<,If you want to talk about any politically thorny issue do so without any office at the signoff and you and i will get along just fine anyone who uses there priestly office for politically power and uses as badly as you have done does not have my respect.>>
> >  
> > Sir, I do not need your permission or your approval as to how I sign or do not sign my posts, thank you.
> >
> >
> > <<Learn how the game was played (politica games of power) use the tools the romans did; and learn to take those consequences the good and the bad.>>
> >  
> > Games? I do not play "games" of any sort, not with anyone. I speak my mind on occasion and when I do, I state the truth as I see it. Some may agree with me and some may not. I have no problem with that, but I do have a problem with any man who presumes to tell me when I can comment and when I cannot. Just because I became a Vestal does not mean I gave up my right to speak up when I feel impelled to do so, and on any issue, political or otherwise. In fact, I urge all the women of Nova Roma to speak their minds when they so feel the need to do so on any issue. Whether I agree with their views or not, I will always support the right of all Nova Roman women to speak up, Vestals included.
> >  
> > Maxima Valeria Messallina
> > Sacerdos Vestalis
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67662 From: n_apollonius_quadratus Date: 2009-06-21
Subject: Re: Digest Number 4586 - Some observations from the peanut gallery
N. Apollonius Quadratus M. Potito salutem plurimam dicit.

Ah, thank you. I'll begin looking it over as soon as I can. Thank you again.

Vale.

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Steve Moore" <astrobear@...> wrote:
>
> Potitus Quadrato SPD.
>
>
>
> For Caesar's many explanations, please see the archives of this list,
> beginning with message 65153 on May 13.
>
>
>
> Vale.
>
>
>
> _____
>
> From: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com [mailto:Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf
> Of n_apollonius_quadratus
> Sent: Saturday, June 20, 2009 9:33 PM
> To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Digest Number 4586 - Some observations from the
> peanut gallery
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> N. Apollonius Quadratus M. Potito salutem plurimam dicit.
>
> I didn't see the fact sheet offered by Cn. Caesar, but I would appreciate a
> link if you could offer it. Also the talking point of a poorly written law
> is how a lot of the USA operates. If the law is poorly written, the clear
> intent is not clear. I'm saying that Modianus is legally Censor because of a
> poorly written law. I like Modianus. I was able to talk to him, but I think
> his candidacy was very black hat. It skirted legality. Just because I think
> his candidacy was not really capable of being legal, it does not change the
> fact that because of the poorly written law, I can see no reason why his
> position of legality for Censor Suffectus is not applicable.
>
> Now I do not have Imperium. The Consules and Praetors do. Because of the
> poorly written law, the Imperium can interpret Modianus' candidacy as legal
> because the stipulations of said law is too nebulas to prohibit his run for
> Censor Suffectus. I took the time to run this by a friend of mine, a lawyer,
> and because of the law and the internal powers vested into the Praetors and
> the Consules Modianus is legally Censor Suffectus. If a lawsuit would be
> issued it will not be a win for the opposing party. I recommend the opposing
> party begin the works of a better law, or more stringent clarification so
> the "abuse" of what the "clear intent" of the law truley is.
>
> If I were Consul or Praetor I would have said Modianus candidacy was illegal
> if the law had been written "...consecutive and/or no more than two terms
> within a six year period." This is chronologically sound and prohibits the
> chance of a consecutive term by the wording, but allows Dictators to declare
> consecutive terms in dire circumstances. So, M. Potitus, while I look
> forward to the information Cn. Caesar offers, I must remain skeptical. Thank
> you for replying to my post though.
>
> Vale.
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogrou <mailto:Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com> ps.com,
> "Steve Moore" <astrobear@> wrote:
> >
> > M. Valerius Potitus N. Apollonio Quadrato SPD.
> >
> >
> >
> > Modianus is not legally censor, and this has been clearly explained by
> Cn.,
> > Iulius Caesar.
> >
> >
> >
> > Furthermore, the talking point that this law is poorly written does not
> > excuse breaking the law's clear intent.
> >
> >
> >
> > If you wonder what the clear intent is, please read the archives.
> >
> >
> >
> > Vale.
> >
> >
> >
> > _____
> >
> > From: Nova-Roma@yahoogrou <mailto:Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com> ps.com
> [mailto:Nova-Roma@yahoogrou <mailto:Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com> ps.com] On
> Behalf
> > Of n_apollonius_quadratus
> > Sent: Saturday, June 20, 2009 3:14 PM
> > To: Nova-Roma@yahoogrou <mailto:Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com> ps.com
> > Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Digest Number 4586 - Some observations from the
> > peanut gallery
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > N. Apollonius Quadratus Andy omnibusque salvete.
> >
> > In general, this doesn't excuse the fact that Modianus is legally Censor.
> > There is no legal loophole as it establishes a chronological impossibility
> > if the service was to include consecutive as a basis for refusal to allow
> > the candidate. The law is poorly written, and much posturing as of late is
> > done to preform deeds I find unsavory. A part from that, yes there is far
> > less Romanesque things being talked about as of late. So I think my next
> > post to the ML will be Roman related. Hm.
> >
> > Valete.
> >
> > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogrou <mailto:Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com> ps.com,
> > "livia_plauta" <
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > <http://groups.
> <http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma/message/67537;_ylc=X3oDMTM2ZTAwYXM4
> > yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma/message/67537;_ylc=X3oDMTM2ZTAwYXM4
> >
> BF9TAzk3MzU5NzE0BGdycElkAzYyODgwMzkEZ3Jwc3BJZAMxNzA1MzEzNzEyBG1zZ0lkAzY3NjEy
> > BHNlYwNmdHIEc2xrA3Z0cGMEc3RpbWUDMTI0NTUzOTg3OQR0cGNJZAM2NzUzNw--> Messages
> > in this topic (7)
> > <http://groups.
> <http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma/post;_ylc=X3oDMTJxOGQ1ZGJpBF9TAzk3M
> > yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma/post;_ylc=X3oDMTJxOGQ1ZGJpBF9TAzk3M
> >
> zU5NzE0BGdycElkAzYyODgwMzkEZ3Jwc3BJZAMxNzA1MzEzNzEyBG1zZ0lkAzY3NjEyBHNlYwNmd
> > HIEc2xrA3JwbHkEc3RpbWUDMTI0NTUzOTg3OQ--?act=reply&messageNum=67612> Reply
> > (via web post) |
> > <http://groups.
> <http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma/post;_ylc=X3oDMTJldmNhZWlkBF9TAzk3M
> > yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma/post;_ylc=X3oDMTJldmNhZWlkBF9TAzk3M
> >
> zU5NzE0BGdycElkAzYyODgwMzkEZ3Jwc3BJZAMxNzA1MzEzNzEyBHNlYwNmdHIEc2xrA250cGMEc
> > 3RpbWUDMTI0NTUzOTg3OQ--> Start a new topic
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67663 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2009-06-21
Subject: Re: Colonia Nova Roma
Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: Colonia Nova Roma

  A. Tullia Scholastica M. Hortensiae Majori quiritibus bonae voluntatis S.P.D.

  

M. Hortensia A.Tullia spd;
 actually Quadratus has some land and says he has the know-how to put up earth bulidings and pour Roman concrete. So it's not a pipe dream at all.

    ATS:  Of course it isn’t.


If we can organize. We'd have a permanent base for our Conventus as well.

    ATS:  Great!  However, there is a matter of Location, Location, and Location.  Where is this land?  Are there any historic villages or the like nearby, such as Colonial Williamsburg?  We have two of them in central NYS; we are more likely to draw history buffs and other tourists if we locate within striking distance of these (or others elsewhere)...and, Quadrate, I think we have lots of limestone around here.  Remember, we really must have multiple coloniae, and more than one in the US as this country is so large.  If it’s far enough north, too, we can get Canadians, who mostly populate the southern reaches of their vast country.  Moreover, the more skills we bring to this, especially practical ones such as construction, surveying, plumbing, etc., the better off we will be.  I have done a bit of gardening, but that’s as far as it goes; yours truly can contribute to planning, but may come in later, when Latin instruction is desired.  

    I think Nashville is a fine site for a Conventus...but not in the summer.  

 bene vale
 Maior

Vale, et valete.


> >   
> >
> > Salvete;
> >  I know we have a colonia list, for those interested in founding a NR colony.
> > But we should talk about it here on the ML. Andy his critique said this was
> > impossible. And I disagree. If we have the will and the citizens we can do it.
> >
> >     ATS:  And I also disagree.
> >
> > Quadratus wrote the post below. We've been talking on the NRcolonia list, I
> > and Livia and I daresay Scholastica would agree; see our colonia
> > self-supporting by giving spoken Latin sessions, like summer school in a Roman
> > environment.
> >
> >     ATS:  That would be part of the package, along with sales of crafts and
> > produce, tours, etc.
> >
> > Quadratus, where are you talking about? the U.S. I presume. Is the land near
> > anything? A town, nightlife...Being off the grid and making our own
> > electricity and having our own well is excellent.
> >
> >     ATS:  Utilities and some other factors were considerations in our earlier
> > investigations.   A lot of us don’t need nightlife of that sort, but the
> > proximity of supermarkets and something resembling pharmacies and clothing
> > stores, to say nothing of medical facilities, is of considerable importance.
> > So, too, is that of related sites to draw tourists.  Unfortunately, most of us
> > are busy, some of us live in areas where travel is inadvisable in winter, and
> > none of us appears to be wealthy, so we have not been able to do much more
> > than discuss qualities desirable in a prospective piece of land.  We would
> > have to have multiple colonies, not just one, but at least one in Europe and
> > one in the Americas.  One has to consider the language issue as well as
> > everything else, especially in Europe; on this side of the pond, there are
> > essentially four official languages (English, French, Spanish, and Portuguese,
> > two of which are more or less geographically restricted), whereas there are
> > many in Europe, and several are little-known outside of their immediate
> > vicinity, whereas three of the four languages in the Americas are well known.
> > It is daunting enough to travel in lands where one does not know the language;
> > living there is another, and far more challenging, situation, especially when
> > one has to start from scratch rather than stay in an existing dwelling.  I
> > don’t think that the European Union has gotten around to adopting our language
> > as universal just yet, and do not expect that shopkeepers or real estate
> > agents in, say, Bulgaria, speak Latin.  Maybe Finland; there are lots of fine
> > Latinists there...
> >
> >
> > I'm learning right now to grow vegetables for home consumption, (the gourmet
> > kind).
> >
> >     ATS:  Good!  The ordinary ones are useful, too...even more so.
> >
> >
> > So this is my skill. And I'm studying latin and just finished Sermo II.
> >
> >
> >     ATS:  Not just yet, young lady:  Avitus just returned and has given us a
> > number of posts to answer, and one of these days will provide the information
> > I need to correct the Sermo II finals, which will then be sent to him for
> > review.  Assuming you pass, then, and only then, will you be liberated
> > fully...and in the mean time I have to nag the Sermo I and Grammatica II
> > students to return their exams as well as correct the GL II exams as they come
> > in.  
> >
> >  bene vale
> >  M. Horensia Maior
> >
> > Vale, et valete.
> >
> >
> >
> > My main idea is that Nova Roma start forming some serious physical wealth. I
> > don't want to see it crash. As for land, well raw land was what I had in mind.
> > I have access to auctions that would allow us to purchase land at around 300
> > or
> > less for around an acre or more as the down payment. Monthly fees of 50 to 200
> > dollars would be required to pay off the land entirely. Since Nova Roma would
> > be buying the land it would be tax exempt and Nova Roma would not need to pay
> > land tax. Since it is raw land, Nova Roma can issue the building of a Roman
> > city from the ground up. Also should Nova Roma decide to hire some workers,
> > the
> > work paid would also be tax exempt and refunded at the end of the Fiscal year.
> > So Nova Roma would not be taking any major expenses out of their budget. If I
> > have to pay for this myself then so be it. I can afford the down payment and
> > subsequent payments there after. I would just need to transition my business
> > from physically based to internet based I suppose.
> >
> > I have some friends who use to work for Micron still have their factory to
> > make
> > solar cells. Using wind turbines and the solar cells I can get for dirt cheap,
> > the main office of Nova Roma could be state of the art, or all the houses
> > could
> > be powered independantly and Nova Roma would not have to worry about
> > electrical
> > costs. On top of that, if we choose the right land to buy we can build a well
> > and put a septic tank in the land. Doing so would allow Nova Roma to have its
> > own water and thus avoid water bills. So if Nova Roma wants to get serious,
> > I'll get serious and we can find a way so that Nova Roma will not have to pay
> > land tax, electric bill, or a water bill and only have to focus on getting
> > customers and paying off the land. I'm ready when they are. Well that's not
> > true, I would need to transition my work over to be able to support me without
> > being physical. So in a couple of months I'm ready...in theory.
> >
> >   
> >
>

  
    

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67664 From: Q. Valerius Poplicola Date: 2009-06-21
Subject: Re: nova roma is syncretic
You'll have to do better than that. I'm very much in touch with current scholarship, thank you very much. You're denying a very basic reality that I explicitly mentioned, so please focus on that instead of what you think I'm talking about.

Poplicola

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Maior" <rory12001@...> wrote:
>
> -We had the binary discussion, it was Agricola, Gualterus and myself, where we discussed the limits of such delineations and how outdated they are; not in tune with current scholarship.
> Maior
>
> >
> > You and I are arguing about two different things, and as usual you moved your goal posts. Heresy is opposed to orthodox, which is the correct teachings. At its fundamental level, it's not belief either, although it's interpreted as belief in the Christian sense. Romans, on the other hand, were orthopractic, that is what is correct in what is done is what matters.
> >
> > But prithee, how can you have something done correctly (orthopraxy) if it was taught wrongly (heterodox)? You can't.
> >
> > It was not acceptable that anyone believed anything, and as evidenced by the Christian purges, everything was not tolerated either.
> >
> > Poplicola
> >
> > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Maior" <rory12001@> wrote:
> > >
> > > Maior Poplicolae sd;
> > >
> > > if you would read my post in reply to Sempronius Regulus you will see that I agreed with him and even referred to the chapter in Beard & North "Patrolling the Unacceptable" p. 228 Vol. 1 that deals with the boundaries that Romans had: principally with magic, superstitio, and unrecognized associations that were felt to threaten the state.
> > >
> > > This has nothing to do with belief, which motivates the concept of heresy.
> > > Boundaries were very fluid. p. 228, though the elite had to support traditional religion.
> > >
> > > Your examples are spotty. Socrates was one philosopher in Greece. The Romans expelled the philosophers from Rome when they felt threatened. The same with Jews and Chaldeans, it was 'from time to time' p.230 not a constant norm.
> > >
> > > As most modern scholarship agrees, the cult of Bacchus had been established for a very long time in Italy, It was the changes and the secret meetings, the political complexion that alarmed the Senate, not the worship of Bacchus or the beliefs of the paricipants. (p. 96)
> > >
> > > The Senate in the case that you are speaking Lutatius Cerco sent a delegation to consult the Oracle of Delphi. It has nothing to do with belief either in Fortuna or the sortes.
> > > Rather political rivalry. Praeneste was considered a foreign town, with a powerful respected lot oracle. I refer you to J. Champeaux "Sors Oraculi ; Les Oracles en Italie sous La Republique et L'Empire"
> > > p. 273.
> > > vale in pacem Concordiae
> > > M. Hortensia Maior
> > >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > Poplicola Maiori:
> > > >
> > > > >> the Romans during the Republic did not have the concept of religious heretics.
> > > >
> > > > This charge is fallacious. Romans, like their Greek counterparts, were concerned with religious taboos and customs just as much as the Christians are with belief. Several points:
> > > >
> > > > Socrates was killed for atheism;
> > > > Philosophers and Jews have both been expelled from Rome;
> > > > the Bacchus cult was repressed;
> > > > Lutatius Cerco was forbidden by the Senate from consulting the oracle of Fortuna at Praeneste - auspices had to be taken inside Rome.
> > > >
> > > > This is one point where you and I disagree over religion. One's personal, family cult is there own business, but it's outright false to suggest that the ancient had no concept of "heresy".
> > > >
> > > > Vale.
> > > >
> > > > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Maior" <rory12001@> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > -Salvete;
> > > > > I was speaking of all culti,Judaism, Zoroastrianism, Isis worshippers, Pythagoreans.
> > > > >
> > > > > the Romans during the Republic did not have the concept of religious heretics. During the Empire up to Constantine, which the religio here in Nova Roma follows, there wasn't such a concept. There are no heresies and no heretics in Nova Roma.
> > > > >
> > > > > It is alien to our culture, to the tolerant syncretic place Nova Roma is.
> > > > >
> > > > > Anyone who calls himself or herself a Christian, is one; gnostic christians, rc christians, orthodox christians, universalists are all equal here. The same if cives worship Isis, Yahweh, Odin, also atheists agnostics, philosophers!
> > > > >
> > > > > We have the state cultus deorum but for everything else:
> > > > >
> > > > > All are equal in Nova Roma! We are a liberal tolerant syncretic polytheistic organization.
> > > > > valete
> > > > > M.Hortensia Maior
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > > Salvete.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > An incorrect depiction has, once again, been given of my private cultus. "[D]uring the republic" there was no such thing as Christianity, as Christ had yet to be born; long before the end of the Western Empire Christianity had formulated itself in contrast to many various and sundry heresies - among them, Gnosticism.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Valete,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Cato
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67665 From: Q. Valerius Poplicola Date: 2009-06-21
Subject: Re: Digest Number 4586 - Some observations from the peanut gallery
American law actually works *quite* a bit on intent. I am not able to recount all the times a judge ruled in a particular way because they ruled with intent and not exact wording. It's become increasingly common here.

Thankfully, they have an ultimate authority with power. Nova Roma's consuls are acting too similar to Andrew Jackson, the man who broke the alliance with Native American groups, told them to pack up and shipped them to Oklahoma, hundreds of miles from their home, over the trail of tears.

Likewise, the consuls have ignored NR's supreme court (the tribunes), and flouting what is actually illegal but unenforceable decided to make Modianus' candidacy legal. It is not up to you and me to decide that Modianus' candidacy is illegal, but to the tribunes, and they decided, and no, exploiting the lack of real power (I mean come on, we're just an internet organization), they shunned the tribunes and embodied the Jacksonian ideal: They've got the power, everyone else be damned.

Poplicola

PS - You never responded. Are you ignoring me for some reason? I sent you a lengthy post. If you don't want to read it, simply say so. I won't waste my breath on someone not actually interested in the subject matter.

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "n_apollonius_quadratus" <n_apollonius_quadratus@...> wrote:
>
> N. Apollonius Quadratus M. Potito salutem plurimam dicit.
>
> I didn't see the fact sheet offered by Cn. Caesar, but I would appreciate a link if you could offer it. Also the talking point of a poorly written law is how a lot of the USA operates. If the law is poorly written, the clear intent is not clear. I'm saying that Modianus is legally Censor because of a poorly written law. I like Modianus. I was able to talk to him, but I think his candidacy was very black hat. It skirted legality. Just because I think his candidacy was not really capable of being legal, it does not change the fact that because of the poorly written law, I can see no reason why his position of legality for Censor Suffectus is not applicable.
>
> Now I do not have Imperium. The Consules and Praetors do. Because of the poorly written law, the Imperium can interpret Modianus' candidacy as legal because the stipulations of said law is too nebulas to prohibit his run for Censor Suffectus. I took the time to run this by a friend of mine, a lawyer, and because of the law and the internal powers vested into the Praetors and the Consules Modianus is legally Censor Suffectus. If a lawsuit would be issued it will not be a win for the opposing party. I recommend the opposing party begin the works of a better law, or more stringent clarification so the "abuse" of what the "clear intent" of the law truley is.
>
> If I were Consul or Praetor I would have said Modianus candidacy was illegal if the law had been written "...consecutive and/or no more than two terms within a six year period." This is chronologically sound and prohibits the chance of a consecutive term by the wording, but allows Dictators to declare consecutive terms in dire circumstances. So, M. Potitus, while I look forward to the information Cn. Caesar offers, I must remain skeptical. Thank you for replying to my post though.
>
> Vale.
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Steve Moore" <astrobear@> wrote:
> >
> > M. Valerius Potitus N. Apollonio Quadrato SPD.
> >
> >
> >
> > Modianus is not legally censor, and this has been clearly explained by Cn.,
> > Iulius Caesar.
> >
> >
> >
> > Furthermore, the talking point that this law is poorly written does not
> > excuse breaking the law's clear intent.
> >
> >
> >
> > If you wonder what the clear intent is, please read the archives.
> >
> >
> >
> > Vale.
> >
> >
> >
> > _____
> >
> > From: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com [mailto:Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf
> > Of n_apollonius_quadratus
> > Sent: Saturday, June 20, 2009 3:14 PM
> > To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> > Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Digest Number 4586 - Some observations from the
> > peanut gallery
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > N. Apollonius Quadratus Andy omnibusque salvete.
> >
> > In general, this doesn't excuse the fact that Modianus is legally Censor.
> > There is no legal loophole as it establishes a chronological impossibility
> > if the service was to include consecutive as a basis for refusal to allow
> > the candidate. The law is poorly written, and much posturing as of late is
> > done to preform deeds I find unsavory. A part from that, yes there is far
> > less Romanesque things being talked about as of late. So I think my next
> > post to the ML will be Roman related. Hm.
> >
> > Valete.
> >
> > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogrou <mailto:Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com> ps.com,
> > "livia_plauta" <
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > <http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma/message/67537;_ylc=X3oDMTM2ZTAwYXM4
> > BF9TAzk3MzU5NzE0BGdycElkAzYyODgwMzkEZ3Jwc3BJZAMxNzA1MzEzNzEyBG1zZ0lkAzY3NjEy
> > BHNlYwNmdHIEc2xrA3Z0cGMEc3RpbWUDMTI0NTUzOTg3OQR0cGNJZAM2NzUzNw--> Messages
> > in this topic (7)
> > <http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma/post;_ylc=X3oDMTJxOGQ1ZGJpBF9TAzk3M
> > zU5NzE0BGdycElkAzYyODgwMzkEZ3Jwc3BJZAMxNzA1MzEzNzEyBG1zZ0lkAzY3NjEyBHNlYwNmd
> > HIEc2xrA3JwbHkEc3RpbWUDMTI0NTUzOTg3OQ--?act=reply&messageNum=67612> Reply
> > (via web post) |
> > <http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma/post;_ylc=X3oDMTJldmNhZWlkBF9TAzk3M
> > zU5NzE0BGdycElkAzYyODgwMzkEZ3Jwc3BJZAMxNzA1MzEzNzEyBHNlYwNmdHIEc2xrA250cGMEc
> > 3RpbWUDMTI0NTUzOTg3OQ--> Start a new topic
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67666 From: n_apollonius_quadratus Date: 2009-06-21
Subject: Re: Digest Number 4586 - Some observations from the peanut gallery
N. Apollonius Quadratus M. Potito salutem plurimam dicit.

Well I read over several pages down the list, very exhaustive. I've got to say, my main contention is the working of office, and the chronology. I can see how the spirit of the law would forbid it, but the letter of the law is, well, ambiguous. This ambiguity is enough for me to think Modianus is still legal. When the letter of the law is changed enough, the spirit shortly follows. There is a distinct break in rule of office, and with the Anal Annie aspect of normal law, that break and the wording is enough for Modianus to be a legal candidate. Also the chronological impossibility to serve more than two full terms in a five year period places the meaning of the first part of the law on a separate course. I do not condone this sort of mish mashing of terms or definitions, but it isn't illegal.

Like I said elsewhere, the law needs to be redone drastically so this doesn't happen again. Granted there is a lot of things Nova Roma needs to change drastically so this doesn't happen again. But I would like to tack on this little disclaimer if I could, Pontitus, I'm a pleb who hasn't paid taxes, so my opinion doesn't really hold much clout. It's just an observation I had, and no matter which way I can't change the course now. I mean I really dislike this mish mashing, but I can't do anything about it, and my observation is just an observation for now. So, here's hoping to the future, eh?

Vale.

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Steve Moore" <astrobear@...> wrote:
>
> Potitus Quadrato SPD.
>
>
>
> For Caesar's many explanations, please see the archives of this list,
> beginning with message 65153 on May 13.
>
>
>
> Vale.
>
>
>
> _____
>
> From: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com [mailto:Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf
> Of n_apollonius_quadratus
> Sent: Saturday, June 20, 2009 9:33 PM
> To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Digest Number 4586 - Some observations from the
> peanut gallery
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> N. Apollonius Quadratus M. Potito salutem plurimam dicit.
>
> I didn't see the fact sheet offered by Cn. Caesar, but I would appreciate a
> link if you could offer it. Also the talking point of a poorly written law
> is how a lot of the USA operates. If the law is poorly written, the clear
> intent is not clear. I'm saying that Modianus is legally Censor because of a
> poorly written law. I like Modianus. I was able to talk to him, but I think
> his candidacy was very black hat. It skirted legality. Just because I think
> his candidacy was not really capable of being legal, it does not change the
> fact that because of the poorly written law, I can see no reason why his
> position of legality for Censor Suffectus is not applicable.
>
> Now I do not have Imperium. The Consules and Praetors do. Because of the
> poorly written law, the Imperium can interpret Modianus' candidacy as legal
> because the stipulations of said law is too nebulas to prohibit his run for
> Censor Suffectus. I took the time to run this by a friend of mine, a lawyer,
> and because of the law and the internal powers vested into the Praetors and
> the Consules Modianus is legally Censor Suffectus. If a lawsuit would be
> issued it will not be a win for the opposing party. I recommend the opposing
> party begin the works of a better law, or more stringent clarification so
> the "abuse" of what the "clear intent" of the law truley is.
>
> If I were Consul or Praetor I would have said Modianus candidacy was illegal
> if the law had been written "...consecutive and/or no more than two terms
> within a six year period." This is chronologically sound and prohibits the
> chance of a consecutive term by the wording, but allows Dictators to declare
> consecutive terms in dire circumstances. So, M. Potitus, while I look
> forward to the information Cn. Caesar offers, I must remain skeptical. Thank
> you for replying to my post though.
>
> Vale.
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogrou <mailto:Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com> ps.com,
> "Steve Moore" <astrobear@> wrote:
> >
> > M. Valerius Potitus N. Apollonio Quadrato SPD.
> >
> >
> >
> > Modianus is not legally censor, and this has been clearly explained by
> Cn.,
> > Iulius Caesar.
> >
> >
> >
> > Furthermore, the talking point that this law is poorly written does not
> > excuse breaking the law's clear intent.
> >
> >
> >
> > If you wonder what the clear intent is, please read the archives.
> >
> >
> >
> > Vale.
> >
> >
> >
> > _____
> >
> > From: Nova-Roma@yahoogrou <mailto:Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com> ps.com
> [mailto:Nova-Roma@yahoogrou <mailto:Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com> ps.com] On
> Behalf
> > Of n_apollonius_quadratus
> > Sent: Saturday, June 20, 2009 3:14 PM
> > To: Nova-Roma@yahoogrou <mailto:Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com> ps.com
> > Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Digest Number 4586 - Some observations from the
> > peanut gallery
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > N. Apollonius Quadratus Andy omnibusque salvete.
> >
> > In general, this doesn't excuse the fact that Modianus is legally Censor.
> > There is no legal loophole as it establishes a chronological impossibility
> > if the service was to include consecutive as a basis for refusal to allow
> > the candidate. The law is poorly written, and much posturing as of late is
> > done to preform deeds I find unsavory. A part from that, yes there is far
> > less Romanesque things being talked about as of late. So I think my next
> > post to the ML will be Roman related. Hm.
> >
> > Valete.
> >
> > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogrou <mailto:Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com> ps.com,
> > "livia_plauta" <
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > <http://groups.
> <http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma/message/67537;_ylc=X3oDMTM2ZTAwYXM4
> > yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma/message/67537;_ylc=X3oDMTM2ZTAwYXM4
> >
> BF9TAzk3MzU5NzE0BGdycElkAzYyODgwMzkEZ3Jwc3BJZAMxNzA1MzEzNzEyBG1zZ0lkAzY3NjEy
> > BHNlYwNmdHIEc2xrA3Z0cGMEc3RpbWUDMTI0NTUzOTg3OQR0cGNJZAM2NzUzNw--> Messages
> > in this topic (7)
> > <http://groups.
> <http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma/post;_ylc=X3oDMTJxOGQ1ZGJpBF9TAzk3M
> > yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma/post;_ylc=X3oDMTJxOGQ1ZGJpBF9TAzk3M
> >
> zU5NzE0BGdycElkAzYyODgwMzkEZ3Jwc3BJZAMxNzA1MzEzNzEyBG1zZ0lkAzY3NjEyBHNlYwNmd
> > HIEc2xrA3JwbHkEc3RpbWUDMTI0NTUzOTg3OQ--?act=reply&messageNum=67612> Reply
> > (via web post) |
> > <http://groups.
> <http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma/post;_ylc=X3oDMTJldmNhZWlkBF9TAzk3M
> > yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma/post;_ylc=X3oDMTJldmNhZWlkBF9TAzk3M
> >
> zU5NzE0BGdycElkAzYyODgwMzkEZ3Jwc3BJZAMxNzA1MzEzNzEyBHNlYwNmdHIEc2xrA250cGMEc
> > 3RpbWUDMTI0NTUzOTg3OQ--> Start a new topic
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67667 From: Q. Valerius Poplicola Date: 2009-06-21
Subject: Re: Digest Number 4586 - Some observations from the peanut gallery
Q. Poplicola N. Quadrato spd:

The law, however, gives the tribunes the right to veto any actions. Essentially the tribunes decide if an action is legal or not by vetoing it or not vetoing it. And no one, not you, not me, not the consuls or praetors, can say whether the tribunes vetoed a legal action illegally, because the laws give those rights to the tribunes and not to the consuls or praetors.

They act, then, essentially comparable to our (American) Supreme Court. The people can change the law, but until they do, they tribunes get to decide.

Cura ut ualeas.

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "n_apollonius_quadratus" <n_apollonius_quadratus@...> wrote:
>
> N. Apollonius Quadratus Q. Poplicola salutem plurimam dicit.
>
> I see the post now, wow that was a long ways up the list of wonder. I understand that the original Intercessio was regarding the veto verification itself, i. e. We say Modianus is Censor, I call Intercessio to that claim. Is that right? The premise being that Modianus is an illegal candidate. That's my contention, Modianus isn't an illegal candidate because of a poorly written law. Saying the law is poorly written and not being a valid argument IS (capitalized for emphasis not yelling) a valid argument. Saying this was not the intent of the law does not change the fact that it was still worded in a way that Modianus should be legally considered Censor. Now, like I said, I like Modianus and I wouldn't mind hanging out with him one day, but ethically speaking this was really black hat tactics and is questionable. Doesn't change the legality of it. It was legally uncomfortable, but not illegal. That's why I don't think the original Intercessio is valid because Modianus is a legal candidate. Now, since I don't have Imperium, this is clearly my opinion, and shouldn't be taken worth a spit.
>
> My opinion is Modianus is a legal candidate based on a poorly written law, but I'm in no position to question nor accuse or anything. As a non-tax paying citizen I really don't have much say. So whatever happens happens and I will keep my attention on this to when I do become a tax paying citizen next month. So I'm not trying to be antagonistic or butt heads, Q. Poplicola, I'm just commenting from my perspective. Realistically, if I was running for office and I had a consecutive term lined up, I would have exploited the same law. I'm pretty cut throat like, if there's an opening I take it. I guess I'm that bad kid down the street that said, "If they didn't want me to laugh at them they shouldn't have gotten out of bed this morning." Now I just need to find Cn. Caesar's post.
>
> Vale.
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Q. Valerius Poplicola" <q.valerius.poplicola@> wrote:
> >
> > You can just ignore the PS on the last email. I had not heard from you. The political atmosphere made this way by a couple of posters and their respondents have made me a little on the weary side. I'm glad to see that you're actually interested.
> >
> > Here's the post:
> >
> > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma/message/67183
> >
> > All the best,
> >
> > Poplicola
> >
> > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "n_apollonius_quadratus" <n_apollonius_quadratus@> wrote:
> > >
> > > N. Apollonius Quadratus Q. Poplicola salutem plurimam dicit.
> > >
> > > I'm sorry, I'm having some trouble finding it. The ML does kind of get washed with posts rather fast. I'm still trying to find it, unless you already have it. I would appreciate a link, but I don't want to bother you. Thanks again for replying to that post, and when I find it, I will look forward to reading it.
> > >
> > > On a side note, I just want to say I am truly neutral on the matter of Modianus candidacy. If the law was written differently, I would clearly have said his candidacy is wrong. I like Modianus, and he seems like a nice guy, though I wouldn't play scrabble with him. Apart from that, I do believe this certain election was extremely iffy and very legally uncomfortable. I recommend the powers that be rework that law so this doesn't happen again. Though, I would like to see what Cn. Caesar said, and your reply as well, Q. Poplicola. Thanks again for helping me get a better perspective of the affairs in Nova Roma.
> > >
> > > Vale.
> > >
> > > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Q. Valerius Poplicola" <q.valerius.poplicola@> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Did you ever read my post correcting your factually incorrect information? I'm curious if you read that because I have not seen you yet respond, although I may have missed it.
> > > >
> > > > Poplicola
> > > >
> > > > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "n_apollonius_quadratus" <n_apollonius_quadratus@> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > N. Apollonius Quadratus Andy omnibusque salvete.
> > > > >
> > > > > In general, this doesn't excuse the fact that Modianus is legally Censor. There is no legal loophole as it establishes a chronological impossibility if the service was to include consecutive as a basis for refusal to allow the candidate. The law is poorly written, and much posturing as of late is done to preform deeds I find unsavory. A part from that, yes there is far less Romanesque things being talked about as of late. So I think my next post to the ML will be Roman related. Hm.
> > > > >
> > > > > Valete.
> > > > >
> > > > > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "livia_plauta" <livia.plauta@> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Salve Andy,
> > > > > > I wish some of the people here would take your advice. Unfortunately their aim seems to be to drive constructive people like you away. I seems they succeed in 95% of the cases.
> > > > > > Then they complai because NR has few assidui.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Vale
> > > > > > Livia
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > potential benefits involved. Like Roman politics that much? Stop by a hobby shop, Reiner Knizia's game "Quo Vadis" and invite some friends over
> > > > > > > for an evening of politicking and wine. You'll have more fun.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Let's face it - if this were the real Roman Republic and/or people wanted to really resolve the recent NR problems "in the Roman way", one or both factions
> > > > > > > would head down to the local gladiatorial school with a sack of denarii, hire a pack of goons and waylay their opponents on the road to Praeneste. Anyone
> > > > > > > familiar with the Gracchi brothers, Sullan proscriptions, Catilinian conspiracy or the civil wars knows this. So, when one or the other side lays claim to
> > > > > > > doing things "in the Roman way", let's face it this is a more civilized age and noone here is doing things as the Romans themselves would have.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67668 From: Kirsteen Wright Date: 2009-06-21
Subject: Re: Protecting Our Votes and Future Elections
On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 1:57 AM, Maior <rory12001@...> wrote:

 from post 67532#
Responding to you is like talking to a pigeon - cute for the tourists but
ultimately a useless affectation that brings no worthwhile result."

That's sexist,

You know Maior, when I first read this, I burst out laughing 'talking to a pigeon' is sexist? but, as I stopped laughing, I felt really sad. You see I'm nearly 58, a dyed-in-the-wool feminist from the consciousness raising groups of the 70s. I remember the real fight we women had for equality.

I remember taking on a heavy workload at university and having to satisfy my lecturers that my husband gave his permission for this as they wouldn't let me do it otherwise. I remember working alongside male colleagues, doing exactly the same job for nearly half their pay, being told women would never be promoted, we weren't as clever as men and besides we'd just end up leaving to have babies. I remember at interviews, being asked if I had children and then told I had no right to be looking for a job, I should be at home with them

I also remember some of the really sexist environments I had to work in - council offices with walls covered in pictures of totally nude women, where the men would openly, in front of me, discuss what they thought of my physical attributes compared to the pictures and what they thought my sex life must be like. Places where you couldn't complain about sexual harassment, about men patting your bottom, running their hands over you or pressing themselves up against you as any complaint led to instant dismissal.

We fought to end all that and, now, it totally saddens me to see the whole feminist fight for equality trivialised by strident harpies who see 'sexism' as just another insult to fling at any male they dislike for whatever reason. It does a total disservice to the whole of womankind and makes a mockery of sisterhood.

I can honestly say I have never once encountered any sexism from anyone in Nova Roma.

Flavia Lucilla Merula







Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67669 From: n_apollonius_quadratus Date: 2009-06-21
Subject: Re: Digest Number 4586 - Some observations from the peanut gallery
N. Apollonius Quadratus Q. Valerio Poplicola salutem plurimam dicit.

Hm, I can accept that they can veto anything a magistrate does, but the Constitution says so long as it violates a law. If Modianus is a legal candidate then their veto is invalid since they are not vetoing anything that violates the law.

But like I said, this is just an observation on my part. It's so very murky and nebulous (and yes I looked up how to spell nebulous so that I don't keep misspelling it like the noobasaurus I am) that things like this can happen. I don't believe a Praetor or Consul can say a veto can't happen, but they can review the law to see if the veto was valid. I mean if the Praetors cannot say if the Tribunus Plebis vetoed something illegally then they can veto literally anything. Some one calls the Senate to order. Intercessio because the Senate will pass a law that will contradict a previous law. Imperium has to play a role to make sure the Tribunus are not frivolously calling Intercessio. How can they say an act that violates the letter or spirit of the Constitution of leges if no one can question whether that Intercessio was ill-placed?

I'm thinking we are going to disagree on this forever, Q. Poplicola. It's just the wording that hangs me up every time. I almost wrote my post that Modianus was illegally elected, but the wording just killed me. It's the wording that's doing me in every time I keep looking it over. And your side offers a great case. It really is very compelling, but the wording just doesn't do it for me. Term/Office/Five-Year Period, it's really bad and I hope it get's some serious loving the next time the Senate meets. I look forward to any more insight you can offer, Q. Poplicola.

Vale.

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Q. Valerius Poplicola" <q.valerius.poplicola@...> wrote:
>
> Q. Poplicola N. Quadrato spd:
>
> The law, however, gives the tribunes the right to veto any actions. Essentially the tribunes decide if an action is legal or not by vetoing it or not vetoing it. And no one, not you, not me, not the consuls or praetors, can say whether the tribunes vetoed a legal action illegally, because the laws give those rights to the tribunes and not to the consuls or praetors.
>
> They act, then, essentially comparable to our (American) Supreme Court. The people can change the law, but until they do, they tribunes get to decide.
>
> Cura ut ualeas.
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "n_apollonius_quadratus" <n_apollonius_quadratus@> wrote:
> >
> > N. Apollonius Quadratus Q. Poplicola salutem plurimam dicit.
> >
> > I see the post now, wow that was a long ways up the list of wonder. I understand that the original Intercessio was regarding the veto verification itself, i. e. We say Modianus is Censor, I call Intercessio to that claim. Is that right? The premise being that Modianus is an illegal candidate. That's my contention, Modianus isn't an illegal candidate because of a poorly written law. Saying the law is poorly written and not being a valid argument IS (capitalized for emphasis not yelling) a valid argument. Saying this was not the intent of the law does not change the fact that it was still worded in a way that Modianus should be legally considered Censor. Now, like I said, I like Modianus and I wouldn't mind hanging out with him one day, but ethically speaking this was really black hat tactics and is questionable. Doesn't change the legality of it. It was legally uncomfortable, but not illegal. That's why I don't think the original Intercessio is valid because Modianus is a legal candidate. Now, since I don't have Imperium, this is clearly my opinion, and shouldn't be taken worth a spit.
> >
> > My opinion is Modianus is a legal candidate based on a poorly written law, but I'm in no position to question nor accuse or anything. As a non-tax paying citizen I really don't have much say. So whatever happens happens and I will keep my attention on this to when I do become a tax paying citizen next month. So I'm not trying to be antagonistic or butt heads, Q. Poplicola, I'm just commenting from my perspective. Realistically, if I was running for office and I had a consecutive term lined up, I would have exploited the same law. I'm pretty cut throat like, if there's an opening I take it. I guess I'm that bad kid down the street that said, "If they didn't want me to laugh at them they shouldn't have gotten out of bed this morning." Now I just need to find Cn. Caesar's post.
> >
> > Vale.
> >
> > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Q. Valerius Poplicola" <q.valerius.poplicola@> wrote:
> > >
> > > You can just ignore the PS on the last email. I had not heard from you. The political atmosphere made this way by a couple of posters and their respondents have made me a little on the weary side. I'm glad to see that you're actually interested.
> > >
> > > Here's the post:
> > >
> > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma/message/67183
> > >
> > > All the best,
> > >
> > > Poplicola
> > >
> > > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "n_apollonius_quadratus" <n_apollonius_quadratus@> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > N. Apollonius Quadratus Q. Poplicola salutem plurimam dicit.
> > > >
> > > > I'm sorry, I'm having some trouble finding it. The ML does kind of get washed with posts rather fast. I'm still trying to find it, unless you already have it. I would appreciate a link, but I don't want to bother you. Thanks again for replying to that post, and when I find it, I will look forward to reading it.
> > > >
> > > > On a side note, I just want to say I am truly neutral on the matter of Modianus candidacy. If the law was written differently, I would clearly have said his candidacy is wrong. I like Modianus, and he seems like a nice guy, though I wouldn't play scrabble with him. Apart from that, I do believe this certain election was extremely iffy and very legally uncomfortable. I recommend the powers that be rework that law so this doesn't happen again. Though, I would like to see what Cn. Caesar said, and your reply as well, Q. Poplicola. Thanks again for helping me get a better perspective of the affairs in Nova Roma.
> > > >
> > > > Vale.
> > > >
> > > > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Q. Valerius Poplicola" <q.valerius.poplicola@> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Did you ever read my post correcting your factually incorrect information? I'm curious if you read that because I have not seen you yet respond, although I may have missed it.
> > > > >
> > > > > Poplicola
> > > > >
> > > > > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "n_apollonius_quadratus" <n_apollonius_quadratus@> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > N. Apollonius Quadratus Andy omnibusque salvete.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > In general, this doesn't excuse the fact that Modianus is legally Censor. There is no legal loophole as it establishes a chronological impossibility if the service was to include consecutive as a basis for refusal to allow the candidate. The law is poorly written, and much posturing as of late is done to preform deeds I find unsavory. A part from that, yes there is far less Romanesque things being talked about as of late. So I think my next post to the ML will be Roman related. Hm.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Valete.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "livia_plauta" <livia.plauta@> wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Salve Andy,
> > > > > > > I wish some of the people here would take your advice. Unfortunately their aim seems to be to drive constructive people like you away. I seems they succeed in 95% of the cases.
> > > > > > > Then they complai because NR has few assidui.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Vale
> > > > > > > Livia
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > potential benefits involved. Like Roman politics that much? Stop by a hobby shop, Reiner Knizia's game "Quo Vadis" and invite some friends over
> > > > > > > > for an evening of politicking and wine. You'll have more fun.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Let's face it - if this were the real Roman Republic and/or people wanted to really resolve the recent NR problems "in the Roman way", one or both factions
> > > > > > > > would head down to the local gladiatorial school with a sack of denarii, hire a pack of goons and waylay their opponents on the road to Praeneste. Anyone
> > > > > > > > familiar with the Gracchi brothers, Sullan proscriptions, Catilinian conspiracy or the civil wars knows this. So, when one or the other side lays claim to
> > > > > > > > doing things "in the Roman way", let's face it this is a more civilized age and noone here is doing things as the Romans themselves would have.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67670 From: Q. Valerius Poplicola Date: 2009-06-21
Subject: Re: Protecting Our Votes and Future Elections
What Felix did was take her words, invert the subjects, and bam, the same thing held true. You should read the convo they had before Messallina played the victim.

Poplicola

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "n_apollonius_quadratus" <n_apollonius_quadratus@...> wrote:
>
> Omnibus salvete.
>
> I'm sorry but I must disagree. While games of intrigue and politicking have their moments of entertainment, serious political struggles and issues need serious effort and straight forward talking. "Playing the game" or using "tricks" do not lend to credibility nor help the situation other than tarnish a person's character. While I do respect your decision to use such tactics for political aims, I do not agree with them. For me, it would be Deal Mud ignore. I would listen to the information given but any Ad Hominum attacks or other such logical fallacies directed at me would be ignored. I'm not that entertaining in the political arena I'm afraid.
>
> Either way, being straight forward is just as Roman as subterfuge.
>
> Valete.
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "wuffa2001" <magewuffa@> wrote:
> >
> > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, violetphearsen@ wrote:
> > >
> >
> >
> > If you going to talk on politically thorny issues
> > you have given the OK to use roman politica game "tricks"
> > deal
> > mud
> > DEAL
> > it is a game the romans paly and i see you in fact do not get it and so your not roman?
> > fine
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > > <<--- On Fri, 6/19/09, wuffa2001 <magewuffa@> wrote:
> > > If you're going to say anything in this Forum about any politically thorny issue the people may use all the old roman debate tricks of the trade on you!>>
> > >  
> > > I am not debating with anybody. Tricks? Ah, so you were using a "trick". Since I do not use "tricks", I did not recognize your use of "tricks". Thank you for explaining to me that you employ "tricks". Citizens of Nova Roma, we have now been warned.
> > >
> > >  
> > > <<With all due respect, if your going to talk politics you going to have mud. And you should expect to be muddied.>>
> > >  
> > > I completely disagree. I think we can discuss political issues without the "mud".
> > >  
> > >
> > > <<If you would stop trying to use your priestly office for politically ends and stop using the words like all the gods think this or that. Then, you will not be muddied. However you think you can have your cake and eat it too, that is not so.>>
> > >  
> > > You are in total error, sir. I have never used my sacred office for political ends of any kind. I have no political aspirations of any sort and I have already said so on this list. When I was offered a seat in the Senate, I respectfully declined it.
> > > I did not say anything about the Gods in my post. I did once before in a post some time ago and I was kindly corrected by one of our esteemed Pontifices.
> > >
> > >
> > > <<Stay clear of the politically thorny issue and I will have a lot more respect for you and your office.>>
> > >  
> > > Many Vestals spoke their minds on the issues of their day and no one ever told them to "stay clear" of any issue. If you find you cannot respect me for speaking my mind, that is your own affair, but regardless of what you think of me, respect for the sacred office of the Vestals should be viewed apart from your own feelings towards any one Vestal in particular. 
> > >
> > > <<,If you want to talk about any politically thorny issue do so without any office at the signoff and you and i will get along just fine anyone who uses there priestly office for politically power and uses as badly as you have done does not have my respect.>>
> > >  
> > > Sir, I do not need your permission or your approval as to how I sign or do not sign my posts, thank you.
> > >
> > >
> > > <<Learn how the game was played (politica games of power) use the tools the romans did; and learn to take those consequences the good and the bad.>>
> > >  
> > > Games? I do not play "games" of any sort, not with anyone. I speak my mind on occasion and when I do, I state the truth as I see it. Some may agree with me and some may not. I have no problem with that, but I do have a problem with any man who presumes to tell me when I can comment and when I cannot. Just because I became a Vestal does not mean I gave up my right to speak up when I feel impelled to do so, and on any issue, political or otherwise. In fact, I urge all the women of Nova Roma to speak their minds when they so feel the need to do so on any issue. Whether I agree with their views or not, I will always support the right of all Nova Roman women to speak up, Vestals included.
> > >  
> > > Maxima Valeria Messallina
> > > Sacerdos Vestalis
> > >
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67671 From: David Kling Date: 2009-06-21
Subject: Re: Digest Number 4586 - Some observations from the peanut gallery
Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus N. Apollonio Quadrato salutem dicit

Thank you.  I do consider myself a nice fellow, and while I do enjoy a nice game of scrabble I don't think you have anything to worry about.  I played a few games last night, and will likely play again this morning.  Fun times.

Vale;

Modianus

On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 12:37 AM, n_apollonius_quadratus <n_apollonius_quadratus@...> wrote:


N. Apollonius Quadratus Q. Poplicola salutem plurimam dicit.

I'm sorry, I'm having some trouble finding it. The ML does kind of get washed with posts rather fast. I'm still trying to find it, unless you already have it. I would appreciate a link, but I don't want to bother you. Thanks again for replying to that post, and when I find it, I will look forward to reading it.

On a side note, I just want to say I am truly neutral on the matter of Modianus candidacy. If the law was written differently, I would clearly have said his candidacy is wrong. I like Modianus, and he seems like a nice guy, though I wouldn't play scrabble with him. Apart from that, I do believe this certain election was extremely iffy and very legally uncomfortable. I recommend the powers that be rework that law so this doesn't happen again. Though, I would like to see what Cn. Caesar said, and your reply as well, Q. Poplicola. Thanks again for helping me get a better perspective of the affairs in Nova Roma.

Vale.




Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67672 From: marcushoratius Date: 2009-06-21
Subject: a. d. XI Kalendas Quinctalias: Battle of Lake Transimene
M. Moravius Piscinus cultoribus Deorum et omnibus salutem plurimam dicit: Deos ego omnis ut fortunas sint precor

Hodie est ante diem XI Kalendas Quinctilias; haec dies comitialis est: Anguifer, qui Graece dicitur ophiouchos mane occidit, tempestatem significat.

AUC 207 / 546 BCE: Death of Thales of Miletus

AUC 536 / 217 BCE: Flaminius neglects his religious responsibilities as consul.

"(C. Flaminius) left the City secretly as a private individual and so reached his province. When this got abroad there was a fresh outburst of indignation on the part of the incensed senate; they declared that he was carrying on war not only with the senate but even with the immortal gods. "On the former occasion," they said, "when he was elected consul against the auspices and we recalled him from the very field of battle, he was disobedient to Gods and men. Now he is conscious that he has despised them and has fled from the Capitol and the customary recital of solemn vows. He refuses to approach the temple of Jupiter Optimus Maximus on the day of his entrance upon office, to see and consult the Senate, to whom he is so odious and whom he alone of all men detests, to proclaim the Latin festival and offer sacrifice to Jupiter Latiaris on the Alban Mount, to proceed to the Capitol and after duly taking the auspices recite the prescribed vows, and from thence, vested in the paludamentum and escorted by lictors, go in state to his province. He has stolen away furtively without his insignia of office, without his lictors, just as though he were some menial employed in the camp and had quitted his native soil to go into exile. He thinks it, forsooth, more consonant with the greatness of his office to enter upon it at Ariminum rather than in Rome, and to put on his official dress in some wayside inn rather than at his own hearth and in the presence of his own household Gods." It was unanimously decided that he should be recalled, brought back if need be by force, and compelled to discharge, on the spot, all the duties he owed to the Gods and men before he went to the army and to his province. Q. Terentius and M. Antistius were delegated for this task, but they had no more influence with him than the dispatch of the Senate in his former consulship. A few days afterwards he entered upon office, and whilst offering his sacrifice, the calf, after it was struck, bounded away out of the hands of the sacrificing priests and bespattered many of the bystanders with its blood. Amongst those at a distance from the altar who did not know what the commotion was about there was great excitement; most people regarded it as a most alarming omen." ~ Livy 21.63


AUC 536 / 217 BCE: Hannibal defeats Flaminius at Lake Transimene

"(Hannibal) had now reached a position eminently adapted for surprise tactics, where the lake comes up close under the hills of Cortona. There is only a very narrow road here between the hills and the lake, as though a space had been purposely left far it. Further on there is a small expanse of level ground flanked by hills, and it was here that Hannibal pitched camp, which was only occupied by his Africans and Spaniards, he himself being in command. The Balearics and the rest of the light infantry he sent behind the hills; the cavalry, conveniently screened by some low hills, he stationed at the mouth of the defile, so that when the Romans had entered it they would be completely shut in by the cavalry, the lake, and the hills. Flaminius had reached the lake at sunset. The next morning, in a still uncertain light, he passed through the defile, without sending any scouts on to feel the way, and when the column began to deploy in the wider extent of level ground the only enemy they saw was the one in front, the rest were concealed in their rear and above their heads. When the Carthaginian saw his object achieved and had his enemy shut in between the lake and the hills with his forces surrounding them, he gave the signal for all to make a simultaneous attack, and they charged straight down upon the point nearest to them. The affair was all the more sudden and unexpected to the Romans because a fog which had risen from the lake was more dense on the plain than on the heights; the bodies of the enemy on the various hills could see each other well enough, and it was all the easier for them to charge all at the same time. The shout of battle rose round the Romans before they could see clearly from whence it came, or became aware that they were surrounded. Fighting began in front and flank before they could form line or get their weapons ready or draw their swords.

"For almost three hours the fighting went on; everywhere a desperate struggle was kept up, but it raged with greater fierceness round the consul. He was followed by the pick of his army, and wherever he saw his men hard pressed and in difficulties he at once went to their help. Distinguished by his armour he was the object of the enemy's fiercest attacks, which his comrades did their utmost to repel, until an Insubrian horseman who knew the consul by sight-his name was Ducarius-cried out to his countrymen, "Here is the man who slew our legions and laid waste our city and our lands! I will offer him in sacrifice to the shades of my foully murdered countrymen." Digging spurs into his horse he charged into the dense masses of the enemy, and slew an armour-bearer who threw himself in the way as he galloped up lance in rest, and then plunged his lance into the consul; but the triarii protected the body with their shields and prevented him from despoiling it. Then began a general flight, neither lake nor mountain stopped the panic-stricken fugitives, they rushed like blind men over cliff and defile, men and arms tumbled pell-mell on one another. A large number, finding no avenue of escape, went into the water up to their shoulders; some in their wild terror even attempted to escape by swimming, an endless and hopeless task in that lake. Either their spirits gave way and they were drowned, or else finding their efforts fruitless, they regained with great difficulty the shallow water at the edge of the lake and were butchered in all directions by the enemy's cavalry who had ridden into the water. About 6000 men who had formed the head of the line of march cut their way through the enemy and cleared the defile, quite unconscious of all that had been going on behind them. They halted on some rising ground, and listened to the shouting below and the clash of arms, but were unable, owing to the fog, to see or find out what the fortunes of the fight were. At last, when the battle was over and the sun's heat had dispelled the fog, mountain and plain revealed in the clear light the disastrous overthrow of the Roman army and showed only too plainly that all was lost.

"This was the famous battle at Trasumennus, and a disaster for Rome memorable as few others have been. Fifteen thousand Romans were killed in action; 1000 fugitives were scattered all over Etruria and reached the City by divers routes; 2500 of the enemy perished on the field, many in both armies afterwards of their wounds." ~ Titus Livius 22.4;6;7


AUC 585 / 168 BCE: The Eve of the Battle of Pydna

"After the completion of the camp''s fortifications, Gaius Sulpicius Gallus, a military tribune of the second legion, who had been praetor the year before, called the troops to an assembly, with the consul's permission, and gave it out that no one should take it as a bad omen that on the next night an eclipse of the moon would occur from the second to the fourth hour of the night. This phenomenom, he said, happened at fixed times in the order of Nature; and therefore it could be foreknown and foretold. And so, just as they were not surprised at the fact that the moon sometimes shone with its full orb, sometimes, at its wane, with a narrow crescent – since the risings and settings of the moon and the sun are regular occurrences – they should not take it for a prodigy that the moon is obscured when it is hidden by the earth's shadow. On the night before 21 June [actually 4 September], when the moon was eclipsed at the time stated, the wisdom of Gaius seemed to the Roman soldiers almost godlike. The Macedonians took the eclipse as a baleful portent, signifying the downfall of the monarchy and the nation: no soothsayer could persuade them otherwise; and there was shouting and wailing in the Macedonian camp until the moon emerged to give its accustomed light". ~ Titus Livius 44.37.5-9


Our thought for today is from Titus Livius 30. 30.7:

"To take hold, rather than allow the opportunity to slip away, is how to solve a problem."
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67673 From: David Kling Date: 2009-06-21
Subject: Appointment of Scribes
Ex Officio

Edictum Censor Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus

I. The following citizens are appointed Censorial Scribes 
  

Publius Annaeus Constantinus Placidus
Titus Flavius Aquila

II. No oath shall be required.

III. This Edictum becomes effective immediately.

Given this the 21st day of June 2762.

a.d. XI Kal. Quin. M. Curiatio M. Iulio coss. MMDCCLXII a.u.c.

Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus
Censor
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67674 From: Maxima Valeria Messallina Date: 2009-06-21
Subject: Re: Regrets
Salve, Quadratus,

<<--- On Sat, 6/20/09, n_apollonius_quadratus <n_apollonius_quadratus@...> wrote:
If the Vestal Virgin cannot forgive that, then that is their deal, >>
 
I did accept Aventina's apology, both publically and privately. She is a good woman and I am happy we are friends. I am also very sad that she has resigned her citizenship, but I understand her reasons.
 
Vale bene in pace Deorum,
 
Maxima Valeria Messallina
Sacerdos Vestalis

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67675 From: Maxima Valeria Messallina Date: 2009-06-21
Subject: Re: Protecting Our Votes and Future Elections
Many on this list discuss political issues, but that does not mean they have consented to anything other than honest discussion. Not all ancient Romans employed "tricks" or played "games", and many Nova Romans, today, follow in their footsteps, and this, too, is a very Roman thing to do. Much has been said about the infamous of ancient Rome, but Rome also had her virtuous, honest and upright citizens and they were just as much Roman as the infamous were. Indeed, I would say they were far more Roman!
 
Vale bene in pace Deorum,
 
Maxima Valeria Messallina
Sacerdos Vestalis
 
 

--- On Sat, 6/20/09, wuffa2001 <magewuffa@...> wrote:

From: wuffa2001 <magewuffa@...>
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Protecting Our Votes and Future Elections
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Date: Saturday, June 20, 2009, 5:26 PM

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com, violetphearsen@ ... wrote:
>

If you going to talk on politically thorny issues
you have given the OK to use roman politica game "tricks"
deal
mud
DEAL
it is a game the romans paly and i see you in fact do not get it and so your not roman?
fine

> <<--- On Fri, 6/19/09, wuffa2001 <magewuffa@. ..> wrote:
> If you're going to say anything in this Forum about any politically thorny issue the people may use all the old roman debate tricks of the trade on you!>>
>  
> I am not debating with anybody. Tricks? Ah, so you were using a "trick". Since I do not use "tricks", I did not recognize your use of "tricks". Thank you for explaining to me that you employ "tricks". Citizens of Nova Roma, we have now been warned.
>
>  
> <<With all due respect, if your going to talk politics you going to have mud. And you should expect to be muddied.>>
>  
> I completely disagree. I think we can discuss political issues without the "mud".
>  
>
> <<If you would stop trying to use your priestly office for politically ends and stop using the words like all the gods think this or that. Then, you will not be muddied. However you think you can have your cake and eat it too, that is not so.>>
>  
> You are in total error, sir. I have never used my sacred office for political ends of any kind. I have no political aspirations of any sort and I have already said so on this list. When I was offered a seat in the Senate, I respectfully declined it.
> I did not say anything about the Gods in my post. I did once before in a post some time ago and I was kindly corrected by one of our esteemed Pontifices.
>
>
> <<Stay clear of the politically thorny issue and I will have a lot more respect for you and your office.>>
>  
> Many Vestals spoke their minds on the issues of their day and no one ever told them to "stay clear" of any issue. If you find you cannot respect me for speaking my mind, that is your own affair, but regardless of what you think of me, respect for the sacred office of the Vestals should be viewed apart from your own feelings towards any one Vestal in particular. 
>
> <<,If you want to talk about any politically thorny issue do so without any office at the signoff and you and i will get along just fine anyone who uses there priestly office for politically power and uses as badly as you have done does not have my respect.>>
>  
> Sir, I do not need your permission or your approval as to how I sign or do not sign my posts, thank you.
>
>
> <<Learn how the game was played (politica games of power) use the tools the romans did; and learn to take those consequences the good and the bad.>>
>  
> Games? I do not play "games" of any sort, not with anyone. I speak my mind on occasion and when I do, I state the truth as I see it. Some may agree with me and some may not. I have no problem with that, but I do have a problem with any man who presumes to tell me when I can comment and when I cannot. Just because I became a Vestal does not mean I gave up my right to speak up when I feel impelled to do so, and on any issue, political or otherwise. In fact, I urge all the women of Nova Roma to speak their minds when they so feel the need to do so on any issue. Whether I agree with their views or not, I will always support the right of all Nova Roman women to speak up, Vestals included.
>  
> Maxima Valeria Messallina
> Sacerdos Vestalis
>


Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67676 From: Maxima Valeria Messallina Date: 2009-06-21
Subject: Re: Protecting Our Votes and Future Elections
Salve, Quadratus,
 
Well said, Sir, and I could not agree more. Some Romans might have involved themselves in subterfuge and tactics of all sorts, but just as many did not. Probably not very entertaining, but definitely very necessary to resolving serious political problems.
 
Vale bene in pace Deorum,
 
Maxima Valeria Messallina
Sacerdos Vestalis


--- On Sat, 6/20/09, n_apollonius_quadratus <n_apollonius_quadratus@...> wrote:

From: n_apollonius_quadratus <n_apollonius_quadratus@...>
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Protecting Our Votes and Future Elections
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Date: Saturday, June 20, 2009, 10:48 PM

Omnibus salvete.

I'm sorry but I must disagree. While games of intrigue and politicking have their moments of entertainment, serious political struggles and issues need serious effort and straight forward talking. "Playing the game" or using "tricks" do not lend to credibility nor help the situation other than tarnish a person's character. While I do respect your decision to use such tactics for political aims, I do not agree with them. For me, it would be Deal Mud ignore. I would listen to the information given but any Ad Hominum attacks or other such logical fallacies directed at me would be ignored. I'm not that entertaining in the political arena I'm afraid.

Either way, being straight forward is just as Roman as subterfuge.

Valete.

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com, "wuffa2001" <magewuffa@. ..> wrote:
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com, violetphearsen@ wrote:
> >
>
>
> If you going to talk on politically thorny issues
> you have given the OK to use roman politica game "tricks"
> deal
> mud
> DEAL
> it is a game the romans paly and i see you in fact do not get it and so your not roman?
> fine
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > <<--- On Fri, 6/19/09, wuffa2001 <magewuffa@> wrote:
> > If you're going to say anything in this Forum about any politically thorny issue the people may use all the old roman debate tricks of the trade on you!>>
> >  
> > I am not debating with anybody. Tricks? Ah, so you were using a "trick". Since I do not use "tricks", I did not recognize your use of "tricks". Thank you for explaining to me that you employ "tricks". Citizens of Nova Roma, we have now been warned.
> >
> >  
> > <<With all due respect, if your going to talk politics you going to have mud. And you should expect to be muddied.>>
> >  
> > I completely disagree. I think we can discuss political issues without the "mud".
> >  
> >
> > <<If you would stop trying to use your priestly office for politically ends and stop using the words like all the gods think this or that. Then, you will not be muddied. However you think you can have your cake and eat it too, that is not so.>>
> >  
> > You are in total error, sir. I have never used my sacred office for political ends of any kind. I have no political aspirations of any sort and I have already said so on this list. When I was offered a seat in the Senate, I respectfully declined it.
> > I did not say anything about the Gods in my post. I did once before in a post some time ago and I was kindly corrected by one of our esteemed Pontifices.
> >
> >
> > <<Stay clear of the politically thorny issue and I will have a lot more respect for you and your office.>>
> >  
> > Many Vestals spoke their minds on the issues of their day and no one ever told them to "stay clear" of any issue. If you find you cannot respect me for speaking my mind, that is your own affair, but regardless of what you think of me, respect for the sacred office of the Vestals should be viewed apart from your own feelings towards any one Vestal in particular. 
> >
> > <<,If you want to talk about any politically thorny issue do so without any office at the signoff and you and i will get along just fine anyone who uses there priestly office for politically power and uses as badly as you have done does not have my respect.>>
> >  
> > Sir, I do not need your permission or your approval as to how I sign or do not sign my posts, thank you.
> >
> >
> > <<Learn how the game was played (politica games of power) use the tools the romans did; and learn to take those consequences the good and the bad.>>
> >  
> > Games? I do not play "games" of any sort, not with anyone. I speak my mind on occasion and when I do, I state the truth as I see it. Some may agree with me and some may not. I have no problem with that, but I do have a problem with any man who presumes to tell me when I can comment and when I cannot. Just because I became a Vestal does not mean I gave up my right to speak up when I feel impelled to do so, and on any issue, political or otherwise. In fact, I urge all the women of Nova Roma to speak their minds when they so feel the need to do so on any issue. Whether I agree with their views or not, I will always support the right of all Nova Roman women to speak up, Vestals included.
> >  
> > Maxima Valeria Messallina
> > Sacerdos Vestalis
> >
>


Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67677 From: Maxima Valeria Messallina Date: 2009-06-21
Subject: Re: Protecting Our Votes and Future Elections
I am not a victim, nor do I play at anything.
I'm sure Quadratus read and understood everything, but he can reply as he wishes.
 
Maxima Valeria Messallina
Sacerdos Vestalis
 
 


--- On Sat, 6/20/09, Q. Valerius Poplicola <q.valerius.poplicola@...> wrote:

From: Q. Valerius Poplicola <q.valerius.poplicola@...>
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Protecting Our Votes and Future Elections
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Date: Saturday, June 20, 2009, 11:39 PM

What Felix did was take her words, invert the subjects, and bam, the same thing held true. You should read the convo they had before Messallina played the victim.

Poplicola

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com, "n_apollonius_ quadratus" <n_apollonius_ quadratus@ ...> wrote:
>
> Omnibus salvete.
>
> I'm sorry but I must disagree. While games of intrigue and politicking have their moments of entertainment, serious political struggles and issues need serious effort and straight forward talking. "Playing the game" or using "tricks" do not lend to credibility nor help the situation other than tarnish a person's character. While I do respect your decision to use such tactics for political aims, I do not agree with them. For me, it would be Deal Mud ignore. I would listen to the information given but any Ad Hominum attacks or other such logical fallacies directed at me would be ignored. I'm not that entertaining in the political arena I'm afraid.
>
> Either way, being straight forward is just as Roman as subterfuge.
>
> Valete.
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com, "wuffa2001" <magewuffa@> wrote:
> >
> > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com, violetphearsen@ wrote:
> > >
> >
> >
> > If you going to talk on politically thorny issues
> > you have given the OK to use roman politica game "tricks"
> > deal
> > mud
> > DEAL
> > it is a game the romans paly and i see you in fact do not get it and so your not roman?
> > fine
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > > <<--- On Fri, 6/19/09, wuffa2001 <magewuffa@> wrote:
> > > If you're going to say anything in this Forum about any politically thorny issue the people may use all the old roman debate tricks of the trade on you!>>
> > >  
> > > I am not debating with anybody. Tricks? Ah, so you were using a "trick". Since I do not use "tricks", I did not recognize your use of "tricks". Thank you for explaining to me that you employ "tricks". Citizens of Nova Roma, we have now been warned.
> > >
> > >  
> > > <<With all due respect, if your going to talk politics you going to have mud. And you should expect to be muddied.>>
> > >  
> > > I completely disagree. I think we can discuss political issues without the "mud".
> > >  
> > >
> > > <<If you would stop trying to use your priestly office for politically ends and stop using the words like all the gods think this or that. Then, you will not be muddied. However you think you can have your cake and eat it too, that is not so.>>
> > >  
> > > You are in total error, sir. I have never used my sacred office for political ends of any kind. I have no political aspirations of any sort and I have already said so on this list. When I was offered a seat in the Senate, I respectfully declined it.
> > > I did not say anything about the Gods in my post. I did once before in a post some time ago and I was kindly corrected by one of our esteemed Pontifices.
> > >
> > >
> > > <<Stay clear of the politically thorny issue and I will have a lot more respect for you and your office.>>
> > >  
> > > Many Vestals spoke their minds on the issues of their day and no one ever told them to "stay clear" of any issue. If you find you cannot respect me for speaking my mind, that is your own affair, but regardless of what you think of me, respect for the sacred office of the Vestals should be viewed apart from your own feelings towards any one Vestal in particular. 
> > >
> > > <<,If you want to talk about any politically thorny issue do so without any office at the signoff and you and i will get along just fine anyone who uses there priestly office for politically power and uses as badly as you have done does not have my respect.>>
> > >  
> > > Sir, I do not need your permission or your approval as to how I sign or do not sign my posts, thank you.
> > >
> > >
> > > <<Learn how the game was played (politica games of power) use the tools the romans did; and learn to take those consequences the good and the bad.>>
> > >  
> > > Games? I do not play "games" of any sort, not with anyone. I speak my mind on occasion and when I do, I state the truth as I see it. Some may agree with me and some may not. I have no problem with that, but I do have a problem with any man who presumes to tell me when I can comment and when I cannot. Just because I became a Vestal does not mean I gave up my right to speak up when I feel impelled to do so, and on any issue, political or otherwise. In fact, I urge all the women of Nova Roma to speak their minds when they so feel the need to do so on any issue. Whether I agree with their views or not, I will always support the right of all Nova Roman women to speak up, Vestals included.
> > >  
> > > Maxima Valeria Messallina
> > > Sacerdos Vestalis
> > >
> >
>


Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67678 From: C. Maria Caeca Date: 2009-06-21
Subject: Re: Protecting Our Votes and Future Elections
Ah, Merula, you *do* bring back memories, and not pleasant ones, (grin).  But, like you, I can easily recognize sexism when I see it (old familiarity), and I recognize when comments and actions are not, and I have only seen it here, once, and not directed at either myself or Maior. Actually, I think that incident was more flippancy than anything.  All in all, though, and despite what some may feel privately (which is their right), I have never seen that here, and don't expect to.  Great post, BTW.
 
C. Maria Caeca, who also remembers.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67679 From: Q. Valerius Poplicola Date: 2009-06-21
Subject: Re: Digest Number 4586 - Some observations from the peanut gallery
Q. Valerius N. Apollonio SPD:

Just a couple of notes:

"I don't believe a Praetor or Consul can say a veto can't happen, but they can review the law to see if the veto was valid. I mean if the Praetors cannot say if the Tribunus Plebis vetoed something illegally then they can veto literally anything. Some one calls the Senate to order. Intercessio because the Senate will pass a law that will contradict a previous law. Imperium has to play a role to make sure the Tribunus are not frivolously calling Intercessio."

I totally 100% disagree. I mean, what if then the Praetores decide that *nothing* the tribunes do is legal, when clearly it is? That would give the praetores a free rein to do whatever they wish. This way, we actually have a way to rein in unruly magistrates. But if you make a stop at that, then you're essentially giving the magistrates no way to be stopped at all.

"How can they say an act that violates the letter or spirit of the Constitution of leges if no one can question whether that Intercessio was ill-placed?"

It's part of the process. We need some sort of supreme authority, and when a majority of the tribunes state that it was valid, it becomes nefarious for others to disagree.

"I look forward to any more insight you can offer, Q. Poplicola."

As I do from you. Unlike some others on their side, you are actually using reason. I do enjoy that quite a bit.

Cura ut ualeas!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67680 From: wuffa2001 Date: 2009-06-21
Subject: ok i done fighting
I ask the Gods and they said the fight was over that I can go now.

note I think the Gods have turned on NR .
for not following the rule of law.

have fun in your little world.

i off to build a temple complex

ok I done fighting
the people who killed NR ( thats the one in office other then TGP,)
have won you guys killed it.
you do not want to rise funds
you fight for defrueding people
i am quiting
allthings in NR my offices .
I wish not to be part of this very sick org.
I will be off and on the BA and will reply to friends


william wheeler
was Marcus Cornelius Felix
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67681 From: Steve Moore Date: 2009-06-21
Subject: Re: Digest Number 4586 - Some observations from the peanut gallery

M. Valerius Potitus N. Apollonio Quadrato SPD.

 

It is a truism that no law, however well-written, can foresee every circumstance that might arise in the future.

 

The Lex Cornelia Iunia was written to prevent anyone from serving for Censor (or Consul, or Praetor) for two terms in a row. If Modianus had tried to run for a second term in the elections of Nov, 2008, I’m sure you would agree that he would be ineligible.

 

And there is a good reason for that: Experience has shown that it is not in the best interest of an organization to have the same person in power for more than a set period of time. You can find plenty of examples of this in other organizations.

 

So, the Lex is not poorly written or ambiguous about preventing someone from serving for two terms in a row.

 

We also know from the authors of the Lex that this was their intent. Thus we know what the intent and spirit of the Lex is, and why it is in the best interest of NR to follow that intent and spirit.

 

Now we come to a circumstance which the Lex did not foresee: that someone who had just completed a term as Censor would try to run again after his successor resigned. Since the letter of the law does not specify what should happen in a case like this (remember, no law can address every possible circumstance that might arise), it falls to interpretation (not opinion) to determine what to do in the present circumstance that will follow the intent and spirit of the law.

 

I have argued that the intent and the spirit of the Lex is: Modianus served in 2007-2008, therefore he cannot serve in 2009-2010, but he can serve in 2011.

 

The Consuls and others have argued that the Lex is satisfied if there is some intervening period between when Modianus served and when he ran for office again.

 

You refer to a “distinct break” between when Modianus completed his term and when he ran for office again. But this introduces an ambiguity into the law: how long must this distinct break be? Suppose Laenas resigned one hour after he took his oath of office on Jan. 1, 2009. In the new election, could Modianus run for office? I say, No, because this would have the same effect as him running for office in Nov., 2008, the very situation that the Lex seeks to prevent. Clearly, to argue that Laenas’ one-hour in office constitutes a “distinct break” is absurd.

 

But what about one day? I would argue that the same answer applies: Modianus could not run for office if Laenas resigned after one day, since this would have the same effect as him running for office in Nov., 2008.

 

One week? Same answer.

 

When we reach one month, I suspect you and I would part ways. (Please let me know if you disagree.) A month, it could be argued, is a distinct break. Yet I would argue that a month break violates the spirit and intent of the Lex, because it has the same effect as if he ran for office in Nov., 2008.

 

Likewise, we could go on to two months, three months, etc.

 

I hold that Modianus cannot serve at all in 2009-2010. This is the clearest interpretation of the Lex and its application to the present circumstance.

 

Vale.

 

 

 

 

 

 


From: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com [mailto:Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of n_apollonius_quadratus
Sent: Saturday, June 20, 2009 11:23 PM
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Digest Number 4586 - Some observations from the peanut gallery

 




N. Apollonius Quadratus M. Potito salutem plurimam dicit.

Well I read over several pages down the list, very exhaustive. I've got to say, my main contention is the working of office, and the chronology. I can see how the spirit of the law would forbid it, but the letter of the law is, well, ambiguous. This ambiguity is enough for me to think Modianus is still legal. When the letter of the law is changed enough, the spirit shortly follows. There is a distinct break in rule of office, and with the Anal Annie aspect of normal law, that break and the wording is enough for Modianus to be a legal candidate. Also the chronological impossibility to serve more than two full terms in a five year period places the meaning of the first part of the law on a separate course. I do not condone this sort of mish mashing of terms or definitions, but it isn't illegal.

Like I said elsewhere, the law needs to be redone drastically so this doesn't happen again. Granted there is a lot of things Nova Roma needs to change drastically so this doesn't happen again. But I would like to tack on this little disclaimer if I could, Pontitus, I'm a pleb who hasn't paid taxes, so my opinion doesn't really hold much clout. It's just an observation I had, and no matter which way I can't change the course now. I mean I really dislike this mish mashing, but I can't do anything about it, and my observation is just an observation for now. So, here's hoping to the future, eh?

Vale.


Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67682 From: lathyrus77 Date: 2009-06-21
Subject: Re: Digest Number 4586 - Some observations from the peanut gallery
--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Q. Valerius Poplicola" <q.valerius.poplicola@...> wrote:
>
I mean, what if then the Praetores decide that *nothing* the tribunes do is legal, when clearly it is? That would give the praetores a free rein to do whatever they wish. This way, we actually have a way to rein >in unruly magistrates.
>


How do you reign in unruly Tribunes? Are Tribunes infallible?

-Anna
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67683 From: violetphearsen@yahoo.com Date: 2009-06-21
Subject: Re: Protecting Our Votes and Future Elections
Salve, Merula
 
I think the comment is more demeaning than sexist, but being demeaning towards women is a bit sexist to be honest.
I, too, am a Feminist and proud of it. I have had the good fortune to have met and talked with some of the women who led the Feminist Movement during the 60's and 70's. I thank you and honor you for your own contributions to that Movement.
I am glad you have not encountered any sexism from anyone in Nova Roma. You are indeed fortunate and I hope you will always be so.
 
Vale bene in pace Deorum,
 
Maxima Valeria Messallina
 
 


--- On Sun, 6/21/09, Kirsteen Wright <kirsteen.falconsfan@...> wrote:

From: Kirsteen Wright <kirsteen.falconsfan@...>
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: Protecting Our Votes and Future Elections
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Date: Sunday, June 21, 2009, 1:35 AM



On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 1:57 AM, Maior <rory12001@yahoo. com> wrote:

 from post 67532#
Responding to you is like talking to a pigeon - cute for the tourists but
ultimately a useless affectation that brings no worthwhile result."

That's sexist,

You know Maior, when I first read this, I burst out laughing 'talking to a pigeon' is sexist? but, as I stopped laughing, I felt really sad. You see I'm nearly 58, a dyed-in-the- wool feminist from the consciousness raising groups of the 70s. I remember the real fight we women had for equality.

I remember taking on a heavy workload at university and having to satisfy my lecturers that my husband gave his permission for this as they wouldn't let me do it otherwise. I remember working alongside male colleagues, doing exactly the same job for nearly half their pay, being told women would never be promoted, we weren't as clever as men and besides we'd just end up leaving to have babies. I remember at interviews, being asked if I had children and then told I had no right to be looking for a job, I should be at home with them

I also remember some of the really sexist environments I had to work in - council offices with walls covered in pictures of totally nude women, where the men would openly, in front of me, discuss what they thought of my physical attributes compared to the pictures and what they thought my sex life must be like. Places where you couldn't complain about sexual harassment, about men patting your bottom, running their hands over you or pressing themselves up against you as any complaint led to instant dismissal.

We fought to end all that and, now, it totally saddens me to see the whole feminist fight for equality trivialised by strident harpies who see 'sexism' as just another insult to fling at any male they dislike for whatever reason. It does a total disservice to the whole of womankind and makes a mockery of sisterhood.

I can honestly say I have never once encountered any sexism from anyone in Nova Roma.

Flavia Lucilla Merula








Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67684 From: C. Maria Caeca Date: 2009-06-21
Subject: question for the Magistrates and Senate
Salvete,

I wish to set recent history aside, for the moment, if I may, because I have
another issue, which deals with the future. One of the few things on which
most people whose posts I have read (and I've read them all) agree is that
the Lex Cornelia Iunia should be significantly revised, to clarify the
language and specify whether "consecutive" refers to the term or the person
serving in that term. My question is this: Has work begun on this revision
or revamping? If not, I urge that it begin, now, while the controversy and
its ramifications are fresh in our minds.

Most respectfully,
C. Maria Caeca
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67685 From: Kirsteen Wright Date: 2009-06-21
Subject: Re: Protecting Our Votes and Future Elections
On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 5:12 PM, <violetphearsen@...> wrote:


Salve, Merula
 
I think the comment is more demeaning than sexist, but being demeaning towards women is a bit sexist to be honest.
 
Salve Messallina

Yes the comment was a tad demeaning, after all it's said in an argument between two antagonists so it's hardly going to be praise :-)

I'm afraid I don't see all demeaning comments towards a woman as sexist. If someone makes a demeaning comment to me because of my gender, then, yes, that is sexist. Likewise if they would make that comment only to a woman and not a man. Both would be clear instances of sexism.

However, I fought for equality, not special privileges. So in any heated argument, indeed in any discussion I simply ask to be teated as a person or indeed antagonist, irrespective of my gender, if that isn't too clumsy way of putting it.  I guess I like to think I can hold my own without resorting to 'I'm a woman so be gentle' :-)  Just my tuppenceworth.

Many thanks for your good wishes. I do appreciate them.

thank you
Flavia Lucilla Merula


Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67686 From: Steve Moore Date: 2009-06-21
Subject: Re: Digest Number 4586 - Some observations from the peanut gallery

 

The “internal control” or the “check” on unruly Tribunes is the fact that there are five of them, and that an intercessio has to be a collegiate decision.

 

Potitus

 

 


From: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com [mailto:Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of lathyrus77
Sent: Sunday, June 21, 2009 9:12 AM
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Digest Number 4586 - Some observations from the peanut gallery

 




--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com, "Q. Valerius Poplicola" <q.valerius. poplicola@ ...> wrote:

>
I mean, what if then the Praetores decide that *nothing* the tribunes do is legal, when clearly it is? That would give the praetores a free rein to do whatever they wish. This way, we actually have a way to rein >in unruly magistrates.
>

How do you reign in unruly Tribunes? Are Tribunes infallible?

-Anna

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67687 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2009-06-21
Subject: Re: Digest Number 4586 - Some observations from the peanut gallery
Cato Annae sal.

Salve.

Actually, in ancient Rome the tribunes didn't even have to tell anybody anything; they simply said "VETO", and the act was stopped. No explanation was needed, no quoting the law, no precedence, nothing, and of course their persons were absolutely inviolate and sacrosanct.

It didn't matter if they were thought of as infallible or not; this power was simply the function of their office.

This is the real Roman veto.

Vale,

Cato



--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "lathyrus77" <lathyrus77@...> wrote:
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Q. Valerius Poplicola" <q.valerius.poplicola@> wrote:
> >
> I mean, what if then the Praetores decide that *nothing* the tribunes do is legal, when clearly it is? That would give the praetores a free rein to do whatever they wish. This way, we actually have a way to rein >in unruly magistrates.
> >
>
>
> How do you reign in unruly Tribunes? Are Tribunes infallible?
>
> -Anna
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67688 From: lathyrus77 Date: 2009-06-21
Subject: Re: Digest Number 4586 - Some observations from the peanut gallery
--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Steve Moore" <astrobear@...> wrote:
>
>
>
> The "internal control" or the "check" on unruly Tribunes is the fact that
> there are five of them, and that an intercessio has to be a collegiate
> decision.
>
>


Similarly isn't a check on censors the fact that both have to agree and make collegiate decisions?

What "power" does a censor have without the other censor? Obviously Censor paulinus isn't just going to go along with anything censor modianus says, so I see no way for this to be an "abuse of power" situation just because he was censor last year. It takes 2 censors to appoint senators(as we saw earlier when Paulinus attempted to do it by himself).

Also, it's apparent that not all tribunes are in agreement with the intercessio of modianus as censor.

-Anna
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67689 From: Maior Date: 2009-06-21
Subject: NR Identity a Fantasy Construct? (was: Re: nova roma is syncretic)
Salvete Agricola Gualtereque;
this topic is of deep interest to me; language and culture.Though not as articulate as Agricola, let me give you some examples drawn from life;
The Old Testament
Now what does that term conjure up? Something outdated, unecessary, superseded. Jewish people for hundreds of years had to put up with that term,
until recently when scholars turned to the more neutral term
Hebrew Scriptures.
It may not be perfect but at least there aren't majoritarian imposed notions of obsolescence.

Now for another term:
rigid orthopraxy
following the 'letter of the law' with the additional idea of that such behavior is devoid of interior belief or content.

Try: ritual master

I assisted as an initiate Tendai priestess in goma (homa) rituals. These are complex esoteric rituals, that involve, hand gestures (mudras), words(mantras) and complex visualizations. The goma ritual is over 1,000 old and the priest who performs it has a little book in front of him with the appropriate mudras, mantras, altar gestures, [picking up several items, like incense burners, or dorjes, and gesturing with them in specific ways).

Never, did I hear anyone use the term 'orthopractic' nor did I ever read or hear such a term in my graduate seminar on buddhism at Duke. But ritual is very important and Tendai Ajari are termed in English 'ritual masters.'

Religious minorities live perfectly easily as subcultures in majority cultures. Jews and Chinese polytheists have their own holidays, calendars, religious names, ritual foods, magazines etc...and not only surivive but also excell. There is no 'schizophrenia' involved. I've grown up this way and so have my Chinese friends. I don't think people who grow up in a dominant culture, have any idea how easy it is to ignore.

It takes some effort to choose a word, but letting Nova Roma define itself as an open Roman polytheistic culture can be done, without importing loaded terminology. Additionally we don't have to take on viewpoints that are foreign to us. It doesn't matter if they are 'dominant' or 'mainstream'.


We can define ourselves and we should.
bene valete in pacem deorum
M. Hortensia Maior




> Salve Agricola,
>
> While I can sympathize with the desire that "we have opposition to the notion that the Christian rhetoric, or any specific rhetoric, is the only correct view", the problem lies in the notion of orthodox self-definition. For orthodox (small 'o') Christian identity, having the claim to the correct view is essential. To force them to express themselves otherwise does violence to their own religious identity. Moreover, to chastise them for this (as I have seen some do) in an organization that embraces the first four centuries of Christian history is inconsistent at best and speaks to the deep structural issues that we have.
>
> As for orthodoxy/orthopraxy, I agree that it may not always be the best way of understanding, but virtually everything we say about ancient Rome is through some type of modern construct. So long as we use them judiciously and also offer some flexibility in understanding when others employ them, I think orthopraxy/orthodoxy can be a useful pair of abstractions. I think one way in doing this is if someone disagrees with their employment in a particular context, the responder can employ a rewording reflecting what the original post may have intended, adding to it what are seen as the proper nuances. In other words, one should move the discussion to what is seen as the proper level of abstraction instead of jumping off the boat when someone enters a discussion at a different level than what someone else may have desired or expected. I think this sort of conciliatory approach is especially important when terms/constructs are employed that are still current in scholarship.
>
> Vale,
>
> Gualterus
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "M. Lucretius Agricola" <marcus.lucretius@> wrote:
> >
> > Agricola Graeco sal,
> >
> > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "gualterus_graecus" <waltms1@> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > I know this is an old topic, however, its ghost still haunts us left and right as seen in the various comments about the Republic, syncretism, opposition to Christian rhetoric while also pretending to being inclusive and it demands some deep structural adjustments within NR.
> > >
> > > Valete,
> > >
> > > Gualterus
> > >
> >
> > I have just a moment to dip in...
> >
> > I don't think we have "opposition to Christian rhetoric" as much as we have opposition to the notion that the Christian rhetoric, or any specific rhetoric, is the only correct view. We should welcome not only polytheism, but multiculturalism and a variety of viewpoints, and a more sophisticated methodology.
> >
> > To take the specific example at hand, the "praxy/doxy" axis is one way of understanding, but not the only one and it may not be the best one for all parties. Any axis of this sort is a mental construction, and as such it may encode certain biases. It is perfectly acceptable, I think, for members of specific community to claim that such axes do not capture the realities that they see and experience. Just because from one viewpoint a set of behaviors can be made to fit within a construct does not mean that the construct is either real or has exclusive validity.
> >
> > Not to put too fine a point on it, this means that we have to distinguish between people expressing an opinion on terms and people insisting that every else agree to use those terms.
> >
> > Also, I am in complete agreement with your assessment regarding the use of the polar pairs, that in reality the extremes are seldom if ever populated. The use of the ends of an axis as exclusive polar opposites is one of the problems with framing discussion in these terms. As a methodology these axes have some use as a starting point, but in the end they may be more limiting than useful.
> >
> > Finally, I think that this sort of discussion is essential to your point about "deep structural adjustments". In my view we have to move not to a different position, but to a more sophisticated view of the positions we have.
> >
> > Thank you for an interesting discussion.
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67690 From: lathyrus77 Date: 2009-06-21
Subject: Re: Digest Number 4586 - Some observations from the peanut gallery
--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Gaius Equitius Cato" <catoinnyc@...> wrote:
>
> Cato Annae sal.
>
> Salve.
>
> Actually, in ancient Rome the tribunes didn't even have to tell anybody anything; they simply said "VETO", and the act was stopped. No explanation was needed, no quoting the law, no precedence, nothing, and of course their persons were absolutely inviolate and sacrosanct.
>
> It didn't matter if they were thought of as infallible or not; this power was simply the function of their office.
>
> This is the real Roman veto.
>


It has been pointed out quite often by many including you that NR isn't ancient rome. Regardless even if a tribune merely says "veto", his colleagues can disagree with him and veto his veto. Obviously not so sacrosanct and inviolate since it's the right of anyone and everyone to criticise *anyone* even tribunes; and other tribunes can impugn each other's veto.

No position in Nova Roma is beyond criticism, it's been clearly demonstrated by the Main list and the Back Alley. Not even the priests and priestesses of the state relgiion are respected by the senators. I've seen a senator call the Pontifex Maximus an "anti-pope" and "fishhead", and the "sucker of satan's barbed c***"(quite colorful and imaginative that one). Most recently, the Vestal Priestess was referred to as a "Political Tramp of a Vestal".

I wonder if any of you can guess which senator has done all those things. As long as NR is complicit by having such person as not only a member but also on the board fo directors there is nothing held sacred or holy in NR.

This is the reputation you've earned.

-Anna
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67691 From: QFabiusMaxmi@aol.com Date: 2009-06-21
Subject: Re: Hm, Roman stuff...
In a message dated 6/20/2009 9:57:28 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time, n_apollonius_quadratus@... writes:
I teach Greco-Roman wrestling and Roman boxing. Fun thing to consider, Alexander the Great reached India and his men did a lot of hand to hand combat. The irony of the situation is there is ample archaeological and written evidence to support that Alexander's soldiers may have started the martial arts in the east. Pankration moves may have actually be what started Judo, but it's one of those we really can't tell sort of situations.
----
I'd be careful making comments like that.  The Greeks were practicing martial arts, grappling and pinning long before Alexanderios III.  Martial Arts among the Persians were not done, since the Persians had a totally different idea of warfare, unless you consider archery to be a martial art.
 
Most empty hand fighting originated in areas where swords were banned from the general populace, yet people still had to defend themselves.   Hence the moves.      
----
When I have one of my teaching sessions, I have my Romans go on a good ol Roman diet. When we march sometimes in southern Idaho, I have them eat Hardtac, because I'm a jerk like that.
---
If you are talking about civil war biscuit, that was not Roman.  That's 19 century. 
---
Though at night when we sit for some good ol minutal marinum with, you guessed it, hardtac and grape wine, it kind of helps put that final staple in a hard days work. During the day I usually have them eat apples or something easy to carry. What else, other Romanesque like thing. Well I don't have my men train naked, and I do allow women to train.
------
Romans didn't train naked, the Greeks did.  You are thinking of gymnastics in the bath.
If we believe Vegetius' "Eptiome" interpretation which makes sense, Romans trained with full armor, so that they could get used to weight of the lorica while carrying out evolutions.
 
I'm interested in your Nomen.  Why did you pick the Apolloni?
 
Q. Fabius Maximus  
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67692 From: Steve Moore Date: 2009-06-21
Subject: Edictum IV of the Governor of America Austroccidentalis

Edictum IV. Sacerdos Provinciae and Legate for the Cultus Deorum

 

M. Valerius Potitus, propraetor, dicit:

 

It is my pleasure to appoint Paulla Corva Gaudialis as Sacerdos Provinciae and Legate for the Cultus Deorum. Her piety will be deeply appreciated.

 

It shall be her duty to promote the Cultus Deorum in our province, especially the veneration of our patron deities: Diana, Iuppiter, Apollo and Silvanus.

 

No oath shall be required.

 

This edict shall take effect immediately.

 

Dated June 21, 2009 (a.d. XI Kal. Iul., MMDCCLXII), in the consulship of M. Curiatus Complutensis and M. Iulius Severus.

 

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67693 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2009-06-21
Subject: Re: Digest Number 4586 - Some observations from the peanut gallery
Cato Annae sal.

Salve.

Ah, OK, this was just another opportunity to keep poking at Sulla.

I thought you might have actually been interested in the contrast of the workings of our tribunes and those of the ancient Romans'.

But just FYI, you mistake criticism of an act for the power to do something about the act in question. In ancient Rome the tribunes *were* above what you are referring to as "criticism"; they stopped magistrates cold in their tracks simply by fiat, and they did so independently of each other.

Vale,

Cato
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67694 From: lathyrus77 Date: 2009-06-21
Subject: Re: Digest Number 4586 - Some observations from the peanut gallery
--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Gaius Equitius Cato" <catoinnyc@...> wrote:
>
> Cato Annae sal.
>
> Salve.
>
> Ah, OK, this was just another opportunity to keep poking at Sulla.
>

The way he has behaved since his unfortnate return has given everyone infinite opportunity to "poke" at Sulla.

After all, nothing I said was untrue, was it? I don't see you contradicting anything I said about him. Your best comeback is "oh you're poking at sulla". Saying this was the only thing I was doing is dishonest however, since the first 2 paragraphs had no reference to sulla whatsoever. Stop being dishonest and maybe people will take you more seriously.


> I thought you might have actually been interested in the contrast of the workings of our tribunes and those of the ancient Romans'.
>

I wasn't. I'm interested to know why you and others claim all of a sudden that tribunes are sacrosanct, when they clearly are not. I recall when Aquila was a tribune many people denigrated him as being overzealous when he tried to veto. No one said anything about him being sacrosanct as tribune then. Why now?


> But just FYI, you mistake criticism of an act for the power to do something about the act in question. In ancient Rome the tribunes *were* above what you are referring to as "criticism"; they stopped magistrates cold in their tracks simply by fiat, and they did so independently of each other.
>

Again, this isn't ancient rome. Everyone can and has criticized the NR tribunes. How sacrosanct and inviolate are these tribunes when they can be called cowards, idiotic, insane, etc?

-Anna
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67695 From: Titus Flavius Aquila Date: 2009-06-21
Subject: AW: [NovaRoma-Announce] Appointment of Scribes
Salve Censor Modianus,
 
I am honoured by your decision and will start with my work right away.
 
Vale optime
Titus Flavius Aquila
Scriba Censor KFBM


Von: David Kling <tau.athanasios@...>
An: nova-roma <Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com>; novaroma-announce@yahoogroups.com
Gesendet: Sonntag, den 21. Juni 2009, 14:07:09 Uhr
Betreff: [NovaRoma-Announce] Appointment of Scribes

Ex Officio

Edictum Censor Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus

I. The following citizens are appointed Censorial Scribes 
  

Publius Annaeus Constantinus Placidus
Titus Flavius Aquila

II. No oath shall be required.

III. This Edictum becomes effective immediately.

Given this the 21st day of June 2762.

a.d. XI Kal. Quin. M. Curiatio M. Iulio coss. MMDCCLXII a.u.c.

Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus
Censor


Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67696 From: gualterus_graecus Date: 2009-06-21
Subject: NR Identity a Fantasy Construct? (was: Re: nova roma is syncretic)
Salve Maior,

I see the "schizophrenia" along two axes:

1) A desire at "polytheistic" self-definition by some while also embracing a time frame in which the polytheistic character of Rome was destroyed. A sub-issue is Christian membership: to what extent should we try at "polytheistic" or "pagan" self-definition while this obviously conflicts with the self-identity of Christian NR members?

2) A desire to adopt the syncretism of the religio during Imperial times while also pretending to be a reconstruction of the Republic. I personally agree that the religious environment of the Empire is more conducive to a modern reconstruction, however, this has nothing to do with the Republic. Our political framework and religious system move along completely different tracks. The combination of the two is a fantasy construction.

I can think of two recent examples that highlight these issues. One was a call for a unified polytheistic culture, a call which is manifestly impossible with Christian members and the timeline being as it is in the preamble. Indeed, Christians aside, there was no type of religious unity in Imperial Rome. The second was chastising Cato for expressing an opinion in internal Christian terms (heresy vs orthodoxy). While this may have been distasteful to some, striking at him for expressing his opinions in this way strikes at Christian identity--at least orthodox (small 'o') Christian identity--since this identity depends on making certain absolute judgments about correct and incorrect faith.

So, what do we do? I think an attempt to rewrite the preamble will create a good opportunity to raise these and other issues about NR identity, allowing us to grapple with the contradictions and, perhaps, resolve them. I will throw out two possible revisions of the preamble, both intentionally worded in a way that I think (hope) will get some more conversation going. :)


(1)
"We, the Senate and People of Nova Roma, as a spiritual Nation, herewith set forth this Constitution as the foundation and structure of our governing institutions and common society. As a nation, Nova Roma shall be the temporal homeland and worldly focus for the Religio Romana. The primary function of Nova Roma shall be to promote the study and practice of Republican Roman civilization, defined as the period from the founding of the City of Rome in 753 BCE to the granting of the title of Augustus to Octavian in 27 BCE and encompassing such fields as religion, culture, politics, art, literature, language, and philosophy.

As the spiritual heir to the ancient Roman Republic, Nova Roma shall endeavor to exist, in all manners practical and acceptable, as its modern restoration."

(2)
"We, the Senate and People of Nova Roma, as a spiritual Nation, herewith set forth this Constitution as the foundation and structure of our governing institutions and common society. We hereby declare our Nation to stand as a beacon for those who would recreate the best of ancient Rome. As a nation, Nova Roma shall be the temporal homeland and worldly focus for not only the Religio Romana but all religions that fall within the scope of our allotted timeline, defined as the period from the founding of the City of Rome in 753 BCE to the removal of the altar of Victory from the Senate in 394 CE. The primary function of Nova Roma shall be to promote the study of Roman civilization encompassing such fields as religion, culture, politics, art, literature, language, and philosophy."

Vale,

Gualterus

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Maior" <rory12001@...> wrote:
>
> Salvete Agricola Gualtereque;
> this topic is of deep interest to me; language and culture.Though not as articulate as Agricola, let me give you some examples drawn from life;
> The Old Testament
> Now what does that term conjure up? Something outdated, unecessary, superseded. Jewish people for hundreds of years had to put up with that term,
> until recently when scholars turned to the more neutral term
> Hebrew Scriptures.
> It may not be perfect but at least there aren't majoritarian imposed notions of obsolescence.
>
> Now for another term:
> rigid orthopraxy
> following the 'letter of the law' with the additional idea of that such behavior is devoid of interior belief or content.
>
> Try: ritual master
>
> I assisted as an initiate Tendai priestess in goma (homa) rituals. These are complex esoteric rituals, that involve, hand gestures (mudras), words(mantras) and complex visualizations. The goma ritual is over 1,000 old and the priest who performs it has a little book in front of him with the appropriate mudras, mantras, altar gestures, [picking up several items, like incense burners, or dorjes, and gesturing with them in specific ways).
>
> Never, did I hear anyone use the term 'orthopractic' nor did I ever read or hear such a term in my graduate seminar on buddhism at Duke. But ritual is very important and Tendai Ajari are termed in English 'ritual masters.'
>
> Religious minorities live perfectly easily as subcultures in majority cultures. Jews and Chinese polytheists have their own holidays, calendars, religious names, ritual foods, magazines etc...and not only surivive but also excell. There is no 'schizophrenia' involved. I've grown up this way and so have my Chinese friends. I don't think people who grow up in a dominant culture, have any idea how easy it is to ignore.
>
> It takes some effort to choose a word, but letting Nova Roma define itself as an open Roman polytheistic culture can be done, without importing loaded terminology. Additionally we don't have to take on viewpoints that are foreign to us. It doesn't matter if they are 'dominant' or 'mainstream'.
>
>
> We can define ourselves and we should.
> bene valete in pacem deorum
> M. Hortensia Maior
>
>
>
>
> > Salve Agricola,
> >
> > While I can sympathize with the desire that "we have opposition to the notion that the Christian rhetoric, or any specific rhetoric, is the only correct view", the problem lies in the notion of orthodox self-definition. For orthodox (small 'o') Christian identity, having the claim to the correct view is essential. To force them to express themselves otherwise does violence to their own religious identity. Moreover, to chastise them for this (as I have seen some do) in an organization that embraces the first four centuries of Christian history is inconsistent at best and speaks to the deep structural issues that we have.
> >
> > As for orthodoxy/orthopraxy, I agree that it may not always be the best way of understanding, but virtually everything we say about ancient Rome is through some type of modern construct. So long as we use them judiciously and also offer some flexibility in understanding when others employ them, I think orthopraxy/orthodoxy can be a useful pair of abstractions. I think one way in doing this is if someone disagrees with their employment in a particular context, the responder can employ a rewording reflecting what the original post may have intended, adding to it what are seen as the proper nuances. In other words, one should move the discussion to what is seen as the proper level of abstraction instead of jumping off the boat when someone enters a discussion at a different level than what someone else may have desired or expected. I think this sort of conciliatory approach is especially important when terms/constructs are employed that are still current in scholarship.
> >
> > Vale,
> >
> > Gualterus
> >
> > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "M. Lucretius Agricola" <marcus.lucretius@> wrote:
> > >
> > > Agricola Graeco sal,
> > >
> > > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "gualterus_graecus" <waltms1@> wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > I know this is an old topic, however, its ghost still haunts us left and right as seen in the various comments about the Republic, syncretism, opposition to Christian rhetoric while also pretending to being inclusive and it demands some deep structural adjustments within NR.
> > > >
> > > > Valete,
> > > >
> > > > Gualterus
> > > >
> > >
> > > I have just a moment to dip in...
> > >
> > > I don't think we have "opposition to Christian rhetoric" as much as we have opposition to the notion that the Christian rhetoric, or any specific rhetoric, is the only correct view. We should welcome not only polytheism, but multiculturalism and a variety of viewpoints, and a more sophisticated methodology.
> > >
> > > To take the specific example at hand, the "praxy/doxy" axis is one way of understanding, but not the only one and it may not be the best one for all parties. Any axis of this sort is a mental construction, and as such it may encode certain biases. It is perfectly acceptable, I think, for members of specific community to claim that such axes do not capture the realities that they see and experience. Just because from one viewpoint a set of behaviors can be made to fit within a construct does not mean that the construct is either real or has exclusive validity.
> > >
> > > Not to put too fine a point on it, this means that we have to distinguish between people expressing an opinion on terms and people insisting that every else agree to use those terms.
> > >
> > > Also, I am in complete agreement with your assessment regarding the use of the polar pairs, that in reality the extremes are seldom if ever populated. The use of the ends of an axis as exclusive polar opposites is one of the problems with framing discussion in these terms. As a methodology these axes have some use as a starting point, but in the end they may be more limiting than useful.
> > >
> > > Finally, I think that this sort of discussion is essential to your point about "deep structural adjustments". In my view we have to move not to a different position, but to a more sophisticated view of the positions we have.
> > >
> > > Thank you for an interesting discussion.
> > >
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67697 From: violetphearsen@yahoo.com Date: 2009-06-21
Subject: Re: Best Wishes on the Vestalia
Salve, amica mea

<<--- On Thu, 6/18/09, A. Tullia Scholastica <fororom@...> wrote:
 
ATS:  Best, if badly belated, wishes for the Vestalia, and thanks for all that you do for the Res Publica.  I can almost see you making fire with two sticks...>>
 
Yep, it was loads of fun! LOL
Actually, Vestalia did not end for me until the 15th and then it took a few days to recuperate and get the house back in order from all the visits, and that included the kittens who caused a commotion every time they came. LOL
Overall, it was a very good Vestalia and for that I give thanks to Holy Vesta.
 
Amica tua,
Maxima Valeria Messallina

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67699 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2009-06-21
Subject: Re: Digest Number 4586 - Some observations from the peanut gallery
Cato Annae sal.

Salve.

"How sacrosanct and inviolate are these tribunes when they can be called cowards, idiotic, insane, etc?"

Their *persons* are sacrosanct, not every decision they make. Anybody may criticize what they do but they cannot be *acted* against. Since we do not have physical proximity, the closest thing we have is obedience to their instructions. When they pronounce a veto and it is upheld, the activity which prompted it must cease. Must. There is not a choice under our law.

Yet our current consuls and praetors have, for what I believe is the first time in Nova Roman history, violated a veto pronounced by a tribune and upheld by his colleagues by continuing to act as if the veto had not been pronounced. In our frame of reference, this can be (and had been, by Galerius Aurelianus) equated with violence against the sacrosanctity of the tribunes' power.

Vale,

Cato
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67700 From: Publius Ullerius Stephanus Venator Date: 2009-06-21
Subject: Re: NR Identity a Fantasy Construct? (was: Re: nova roma is syncreti
Ave;

If I may?

Schizophrenia is not the proper term for a split personality as it is
a disorder in perception affecting the five physical senses, as well
as one's mental well-being.

A personality being torn along axes of manifestation would more
properly be dementia praecox or dissociative identity disorder.

Vale - Venator (who remembers some of his abnormal psych course work ,-)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67701 From: lathyrus77 Date: 2009-06-21
Subject: Re: Digest Number 4586 - Some observations from the peanut gallery
--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Gaius Equitius Cato" <catoinnyc@...> wrote:

> Their *persons* are sacrosanct, not every decision they make. Anybody may criticize what they do but they cannot be *acted* against.

Sacrosanct means they can't be cirticized. Pick a new word to describe them.


-Anna
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67702 From: gualterus_graecus Date: 2009-06-21
Subject: NR Identity a Fantasy Construct? (was: Re: nova roma is syncretic)
Salve,

Yes, you're absolutely right. I was aware of the medical definition, but since the discussion was not about psychiatry I thought the layman's usage would be rhetorically better than saying NR has MPD/ DID. :P

Vale,

Gualterus

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Publius Ullerius Stephanus Venator <famila.ulleria.venii@...> wrote:
>
> Ave;
>
> If I may?
>
> Schizophrenia is not the proper term for a split personality as it is
> a disorder in perception affecting the five physical senses, as well
> as one's mental well-being.
>
> A personality being torn along axes of manifestation would more
> properly be dementia praecox or dissociative identity disorder.
>
> Vale - Venator (who remembers some of his abnormal psych course work ,-)
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67703 From: Q. Valerius Poplicola Date: 2009-06-21
Subject: Re: Digest Number 4586 - Some observations from the peanut gallery
Infallible? That's for the Christians. We Romans don't worry about that.

It's simple, though, we *don't* rein (note the spelling: not reign, but rein - I thought you were a stickler for those things) in tribunes, just like in America we don't rein in the Supreme Court. That's why you have multiple tribunes and multiple justices to counterbalance any possible bias in one person. But the consuls are only two, so a consular agenda is easier to roll over the rights and laws than 3 out of 5 tribunes.

Poplicola

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "lathyrus77" <lathyrus77@...> wrote:
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Q. Valerius Poplicola" <q.valerius.poplicola@> wrote:
> >
> I mean, what if then the Praetores decide that *nothing* the tribunes do is legal, when clearly it is? That would give the praetores a free rein to do whatever they wish. This way, we actually have a way to rein >in unruly magistrates.
> >
>
>
> How do you reign in unruly Tribunes? Are Tribunes infallible?
>
> -Anna
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67704 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2009-06-21
Subject: Re: Digest Number 4586 - Some observations from the peanut gallery
Cato Annae sal.

Salve.

Well, this is indicative of the basic problem we have here; again, their *words* are not sacrosanct, their *persons* are.

But since we do not have physical proximity, their pronunciation of a veto via post must be given the same weight as the physical interpolation of their persons in order to stop a magistrate from acting would have been given in ancient Rome.

So the reasons behind the pronunciation of a a veto can certainly be criticized, but the veto itself stands no matter what anyone says if it is upheld by his colleagues; criticism of the veto itself assumes that it can be stopped, which it cannot. It's a very slender line here, and I'm not sure if I'm doing a very good job of explaning my logic.

Vale,

Cato



--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "lathyrus77" <lathyrus77@...> wrote:
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Gaius Equitius Cato" <catoinnyc@> wrote:
>
> > Their *persons* are sacrosanct, not every decision they make. Anybody may criticize what they do but they cannot be *acted* against.
>
> Sacrosanct means they can't be cirticized. Pick a new word to describe them.
>
>
> -Anna
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67705 From: David Kling Date: 2009-06-21
Subject: Appointment of Scribe - Gaius Petronius Dexter
Ex Officio

Edictum Censor Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus

I. The following citizen is appointed a Censorial Scribe 
 

Gaius Petronius Dexter

II. No oath shall be required.

III. This Edictum becomes effective immediately.

Given this the 21st day of June 2762.

a.d. XI Kal. Quin. M. Curiatio M. Iulio coss. MMDCCLXII a.u.c.

Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus
Censor
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67706 From: Q. Valerius Poplicola Date: 2009-06-21
Subject: Re: Digest Number 4586 - Some observations from the peanut gallery
Sacrosanctus was the word that the Romans used to describe them.

Read a book.

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "lathyrus77" <lathyrus77@...> wrote:
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Gaius Equitius Cato" <catoinnyc@> wrote:
>
> > Their *persons* are sacrosanct, not every decision they make. Anybody may criticize what they do but they cannot be *acted* against.
>
> Sacrosanct means they can't be cirticized. Pick a new word to describe them.
>
>
> -Anna
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67707 From: lathyrus77 Date: 2009-06-21
Subject: Re: Digest Number 4586 - Some observations from the peanut gallery
--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Q. Valerius Poplicola" <q.valerius.poplicola@...> wrote:
>
> Infallible? That's for the Christians. We Romans don't worry about that.
>
> It's simple, though, we *don't* rein (note the spelling: not reign, but rein - I thought you were a stickler for those things) in tribunes, just like in America we don't rein in the Supreme Court. That's why you have multiple tribunes and multiple justices to counterbalance any possible bias in one person. But the consuls are only two, so a consular agenda is easier to roll over the rights and laws than 3 out of 5 tribunes.
>
> Poplicola
>


We also don't elect the supreme court, and they'rer appointed for life and they have an extensive backround in law. How is that comparable to the tribunes?

-Anna
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67708 From: lathyrus77 Date: 2009-06-21
Subject: Re: Digest Number 4586 - Some observations from the peanut gallery
--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Gaius Equitius Cato" <catoinnyc@...> wrote:
>
> Cato Annae sal.
>
> Salve.
>
> Well, this is indicative of the basic problem we have here; again, their *words* are not sacrosanct, their *persons* are.
>
>

You need to pick a new word.

Sacrosanct
Function:
adjective
Etymology:
Latin sacrosanctus, probably from sacro sanctus hallowed by a sacred rite
Date:
1601

1 : most sacred or holy : inviolable 2 : treated as if holy : immune from criticism or violation <politically sacrosanct programs>


Immune from criticism or violation, cato.

-Anna
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67709 From: lathyrus77 Date: 2009-06-21
Subject: Re: Digest Number 4586 - Some observations from the peanut gallery
--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Q. Valerius Poplicola" <q.valerius.poplicola@...> wrote:
>
> Sacrosanctus was the word that the Romans used to describe them.
>
> Read a book.
>


Again, we are not in ancient rome. So unless you can show me some ancient romans that can verify the NR tribunes are sacrosanct, you need to shut up about it, or pick a new word.

-Anna
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67710 From: M·CVR·COMPLVTENSIS Date: 2009-06-21
Subject: Re: My Statement of Opposition to the Intercessio!
Here is the Consular response.

Tribunus Appius Gaslerius Aurelianus showed his disagreement with the intercessio on time. Tribunus Appius Galerius Aurelianus congratuled the Censor elected Fabius Buteo Modianus.

This message is only the confirmation of a previous act to avoid misunderstandings.

2 Tribunes agree with the intercessio and 2 Tribunes disagree.

End of the question

Vale et valete


M·CVRIATIVS·COMPLVTENSIS
CONSVL NOVAE ROMAE
CONSVL HISPANIAE

NOVA ROMA

-------------------------------------------

ex paucis multa, ex minimis maxima


2009/6/21 Gnaeus Iulius Caesar <gn_iulius_caesar@...>


Cn. Iulius Caesar SPD.

Well, the intercessio survives. I await with interest the consular response.

Optime valete



--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Gnaeus Iulius Caesar" <gn_iulius_caesar@...> wrote:
>
> Cn Iulius Caesar Ap. Galerio Aureliano SPD
>
> Yes I think so. The deadine was 8.29 pm Mountain Time or 4.29 am CET.
>
> Optime vale


Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67711 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2009-06-21
Subject: Re: Digest Number 4586 - Some observations from the peanut gallery
Cato Annae sal.

Salve.

"shut up about it"...

And this is indicative of the level to which you wish to take the conversation. Very nicely done.

The person of a tribune is sacrosanct according to *our* law as well: "The office of Tribunus Plebis is Sacred in the Republic..." (lex Didia Gemina de potestate tribunicia, III). Their veto cannot be interfered with by any other magistrate, including magistrates holding imperium: "The holder of Tribunicia Potestas is not subject to any Potestas or Imperium when acting ex officio within his Tribunicia Potestas." (lex Arminia Equitia de imperio, 3.B)

While it is certainly possible to voice disagreement with the reasons for pronouncing a veto, the veto itself - once upheld by the tribune's colleagues - cannot be interfered with; acting in defiance of a tribunician veto is the equivalent of acting against their sacrosanct person.

I cannot think of a way to make this clearer.

Vale,

Cato
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67712 From: Maior Date: 2009-06-21
Subject: NR Identity Reality or Fantasy Construct? (was: Re: nova roma is sy
Salve Gualtere;
1. most polytheists here don't have a problem with the time frame, as our focus is on polytheist institutions, cults, we dont talk among ourselves about Christianity at all. I think that's more a issue for a scholar than a practitioner.

Christian members joined Nova Roma knowing it is a polytheistic org. It's on our main page. They can live here quite happily. I celebrate Saturnalia while everyone else is celebrating Christmas with no problem. But I am used to being a minority. I do think it is a cultural suprise for Christians not to control the culture and discourse, but the citizens here are thoughtful and sophisticated.

2. There is no 'pretending'. Politically and in our institutions we do try to imitate the republic, while sensitively updating.

Let me give you an example to show the conflict that troubles you isn't one for us in practice. I applied to the Collegium Pontificum to be flaminica. Now there are [so far] no examples of single flaminica in the republic, there were married couples of flamen-flaminica and single flamens.

I looked to the early Imperial period where Agrippina was flaminica to Divus Claudius and later on there are many examples of single flaminicae to cities and the Imperial family. I made a good case, backed by scholarship and was admitted. For our reconstruction the Imperial period is very helpful.

Its perfectly easy for Christians to live with pagans in NR in a unified pagan culture. It may be impossible for non-syncretic Christians but that is an internal problem for the individual. I live and mix easily in the dominant Christian culture I live in, as a Jewish person, as a polytheist.

As for Cato; I'm sure he read on our front page: Nova Roma'Dedicated to the restoration of classical Roman religion, culture and virtues' Nova Roma says nothing about perserving his identity based on making absolute judgements.
He certainly has a problem here, but the rest don't. Cato has many cultural institutions to support his identity. Roman reconstructionists only have Nova Roma. Our needs take precendence.

As for the Constitution, aagh a document. Considering the brouhahah recently, sometimes I think documents are a bad thing;-) I'm tending towards the organic British idea. Nova Roma's religio is developing organically. If you go to the religio list, you will 0 unpleasantness or problems.
Gualtere, I've found there is a big divide between the scholar of religion and the practitioner. I remember my professor discussing all the theories concerning the 'meaning' of an esoteric ritual; performance, political, etc...... I told him; "I asked the 30 yr old priest what he intended in the goma ceremony, he answered' I bring down the deity Fudo-Myo and ask him for a benefit which he grants.'"

My naive professor was shocked by such an answer, that a young man would believe in Fudo-myo and the power of the 'magical' ceremony. He studied Japanese Buddhism for years but really knew nothing about the reality of practice and what went on.
optime vale
Maior



>
> Salve Maior,
>
> I see the "schizophrenia" along two axes:
>
> 1) A desire at "polytheistic" self-definition by some while also embracing a time frame in which the polytheistic character of Rome was destroyed. A sub-issue is Christian membership: to what extent should we try at "polytheistic" or "pagan" self-definition while this obviously conflicts with the self-identity of Christian NR members?
>
> 2) A desire to adopt the syncretism of the religio during Imperial times while also pretending to be a reconstruction of the Republic. I personally agree that the religious environment of the Empire is more conducive to a modern reconstruction, however, this has nothing to do with the Republic. Our political framework and religious system move along completely different tracks. The combination of the two is a fantasy construction.
>
> I can think of two recent examples that highlight these issues. One was a call for a unified polytheistic culture, a call which is manifestly impossible with Christian members and the timeline being as it is in the preamble. Indeed, Christians aside, there was no type of religious unity in Imperial Rome. The second was chastising Cato for expressing an opinion in internal Christian terms (heresy vs orthodoxy). While this may have been distasteful to some, striking at him for expressing his opinions in this way strikes at Christian identity--at least orthodox (small 'o') Christian identity--since this identity depends on making certain absolute judgments about correct and incorrect faith.
>
> So, what do we do? I think an attempt to rewrite the preamble will create a good opportunity to raise these and other issues about NR identity, allowing us to grapple with the contradictions and, perhaps, resolve them. I will throw out two possible revisions of the preamble, both intentionally worded in a way that I think (hope) will get some more conversation going. :)
>
>
> (1)
> "We, the Senate and People of Nova Roma, as a spiritual Nation, herewith set forth this Constitution as the foundation and structure of our governing institutions and common society. As a nation, Nova Roma shall be the temporal homeland and worldly focus for the Religio Romana. The primary function of Nova Roma shall be to promote the study and practice of Republican Roman civilization, defined as the period from the founding of the City of Rome in 753 BCE to the granting of the title of Augustus to Octavian in 27 BCE and encompassing such fields as religion, culture, politics, art, literature, language, and philosophy.
>
> As the spiritual heir to the ancient Roman Republic, Nova Roma shall endeavor to exist, in all manners practical and acceptable, as its modern restoration."
>
> (2)
> "We, the Senate and People of Nova Roma, as a spiritual Nation, herewith set forth this Constitution as the foundation and structure of our governing institutions and common society. We hereby declare our Nation to stand as a beacon for those who would recreate the best of ancient Rome. As a nation, Nova Roma shall be the temporal homeland and worldly focus for not only the Religio Romana but all religions that fall within the scope of our allotted timeline, defined as the period from the founding of the City of Rome in 753 BCE to the removal of the altar of Victory from the Senate in 394 CE. The primary function of Nova Roma shall be to promote the study of Roman civilization encompassing such fields as religion, culture, politics, art, literature, language, and philosophy."
>
> Vale,
>
> Gualterus
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Maior" <rory12001@> wrote:
> >
> > Salvete Agricola Gualtereque;
> > this topic is of deep interest to me; language and culture.Though not as articulate as Agricola, let me give you some examples drawn from life;
> > The Old Testament
> > Now what does that term conjure up? Something outdated, unecessary, superseded. Jewish people for hundreds of years had to put up with that term,
> > until recently when scholars turned to the more neutral term
> > Hebrew Scriptures.
> > It may not be perfect but at least there aren't majoritarian imposed notions of obsolescence.
> >
> > Now for another term:
> > rigid orthopraxy
> > following the 'letter of the law' with the additional idea of that such behavior is devoid of interior belief or content.
> >
> > Try: ritual master
> >
> > I assisted as an initiate Tendai priestess in goma (homa) rituals. These are complex esoteric rituals, that involve, hand gestures (mudras), words(mantras) and complex visualizations. The goma ritual is over 1,000 old and the priest who performs it has a little book in front of him with the appropriate mudras, mantras, altar gestures, [picking up several items, like incense burners, or dorjes, and gesturing with them in specific ways).
> >
> > Never, did I hear anyone use the term 'orthopractic' nor did I ever read or hear such a term in my graduate seminar on buddhism at Duke. But ritual is very important and Tendai Ajari are termed in English 'ritual masters.'
> >
> > Religious minorities live perfectly easily as subcultures in majority cultures. Jews and Chinese polytheists have their own holidays, calendars, religious names, ritual foods, magazines etc...and not only surivive but also excell. There is no 'schizophrenia' involved. I've grown up this way and so have my Chinese friends. I don't think people who grow up in a dominant culture, have any idea how easy it is to ignore.
> >
> > It takes some effort to choose a word, but letting Nova Roma define itself as an open Roman polytheistic culture can be done, without importing loaded terminology. Additionally we don't have to take on viewpoints that are foreign to us. It doesn't matter if they are 'dominant' or 'mainstream'.
> >
> >
> > We can define ourselves and we should.
> > bene valete in pacem deorum
> > M. Hortensia Maior
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > > Salve Agricola,
> > >
> > > While I can sympathize with the desire that "we have opposition to the notion that the Christian rhetoric, or any specific rhetoric, is the only correct view", the problem lies in the notion of orthodox self-definition. For orthodox (small 'o') Christian identity, having the claim to the correct view is essential. To force them to express themselves otherwise does violence to their own religious identity. Moreover, to chastise them for this (as I have seen some do) in an organization that embraces the first four centuries of Christian history is inconsistent at best and speaks to the deep structural issues that we have.
> > >
> > > As for orthodoxy/orthopraxy, I agree that it may not always be the best way of understanding, but virtually everything we say about ancient Rome is through some type of modern construct. So long as we use them judiciously and also offer some flexibility in understanding when others employ them, I think orthopraxy/orthodoxy can be a useful pair of abstractions. I think one way in doing this is if someone disagrees with their employment in a particular context, the responder can employ a rewording reflecting what the original post may have intended, adding to it what are seen as the proper nuances. In other words, one should move the discussion to what is seen as the proper level of abstraction instead of jumping off the boat when someone enters a discussion at a different level than what someone else may have desired or expected. I think this sort of conciliatory approach is especially important when terms/constructs are employed that are still current in scholarship.
> > >
> > > Vale,
> > >
> > > Gualterus
> > >
> > > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "M. Lucretius Agricola" <marcus.lucretius@> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Agricola Graeco sal,
> > > >
> > > > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "gualterus_graecus" <waltms1@> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > I know this is an old topic, however, its ghost still haunts us left and right as seen in the various comments about the Republic, syncretism, opposition to Christian rhetoric while also pretending to being inclusive and it demands some deep structural adjustments within NR.
> > > > >
> > > > > Valete,
> > > > >
> > > > > Gualterus
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > I have just a moment to dip in...
> > > >
> > > > I don't think we have "opposition to Christian rhetoric" as much as we have opposition to the notion that the Christian rhetoric, or any specific rhetoric, is the only correct view. We should welcome not only polytheism, but multiculturalism and a variety of viewpoints, and a more sophisticated methodology.
> > > >
> > > > To take the specific example at hand, the "praxy/doxy" axis is one way of understanding, but not the only one and it may not be the best one for all parties. Any axis of this sort is a mental construction, and as such it may encode certain biases. It is perfectly acceptable, I think, for members of specific community to claim that such axes do not capture the realities that they see and experience. Just because from one viewpoint a set of behaviors can be made to fit within a construct does not mean that the construct is either real or has exclusive validity.
> > > >
> > > > Not to put too fine a point on it, this means that we have to distinguish between people expressing an opinion on terms and people insisting that every else agree to use those terms.
> > > >
> > > > Also, I am in complete agreement with your assessment regarding the use of the polar pairs, that in reality the extremes are seldom if ever populated. The use of the ends of an axis as exclusive polar opposites is one of the problems with framing discussion in these terms. As a methodology these axes have some use as a starting point, but in the end they may be more limiting than useful.
> > > >
> > > > Finally, I think that this sort of discussion is essential to your point about "deep structural adjustments". In my view we have to move not to a different position, but to a more sophisticated view of the positions we have.
> > > >
> > > > Thank you for an interesting discussion.
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67713 From: Gnaeus Iulius Caesar Date: 2009-06-21
Subject: Re: My Statement of Opposition to the Intercessio!
Cn Iulius Caesar Consuli SPD.
 
Well by my math the 72 hours was up at 4.29am CET. Appius Galerius Aurelianus saw fit to post his response later. A congratulatory note can hardly be considered a definitive agreement, and as for the note you forwarded, I think if you examine the wording of Section IV of Lex Labiena de intercessione "During this 72 hour period, other tribuni plebis may officially announce their agreement or disagreement with the particular use of intercessio." Are you really so lost for options that you have to try and claim a congratulatory note is an official disagreement? As for the other, the forwarded note from you isn't even clear which intercessio the tribune was objecting to. Added to which is it appropriate to have other people being allowed to forward notes to the Main List or elsewhere. I recall in the trial of Cincinnatus you expressly forbade accepting the testimony of Palladius until he himself sent it as you stated you couldn't be sure it was from him. You refused to accept it from his advocatus. Recall that? 
 
The result of this is that whether you ignore this intercessio or not by your own words apparently the result of the tie break was corrupted. It remains corrupted therefore whether you recognize the intercessio or not. Therefore Modianus's claim to be censor is corrupted. Yes, I know you will claim that the intercessio doesn't apply, but I think the facts speak for themselves and your attempt to wriggle out of the consequences are even more feeble than last time, so the taint of corruption of the vote is there on top of all the other taints attached to his candidacy.
 
Optime vale

Sent: Sunday, June 21, 2009 4:04 PM
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: My Statement of Opposition to the Intercessio!

Here is the Consular response.

Tribunus Appius Gaslerius Aurelianus showed his disagreement with the intercessio on time. Tribunus Appius Galerius Aurelianus congratuled the Censor elected Fabius Buteo Modianus.

This message is only the confirmation of a previous act to avoid misunderstandings.

2 Tribunes agree with the intercessio and 2 Tribunes disagree.

End of the question

Vale et valete


M·CVRIATIVS·COMPLVTENSIS
CONSVL NOVAE ROMAE
CONSVL HISPANIAE

NOVA ROMA

-------------------------------------------

ex paucis multa, ex minimis maxima


2009/6/21 Gnaeus Iulius Caesar <gn_iulius_caesar@...>


Cn. Iulius Caesar SPD.

Well, the intercessio survives. I await with interest the consular response.

Optime valete



--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Gnaeus Iulius Caesar" <gn_iulius_caesar@...> wrote:
>
> Cn Iulius Caesar Ap. Galerio Aureliano SPD
>
> Yes I think so. The deadine was 8.29 pm Mountain Time or 4.29 am CET.
>
> Optime vale


Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67714 From: Publius Ullerius Stephanus Venator Date: 2009-06-21
Subject: Re: NR Identity a Fantasy Construct? (was: Re: nova roma is syncreti
Ave Gualterus;

On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 3:28 PM, gualterus_graecus wrote:
>
> Salve,
>
> Yes, you're absolutely right. I was aware of the medical definition, but since the discussion was not about psychiatry I thought the layman's usage would be rhetorically better than saying NR has MPD/ DID. :P
>
> Vale,
>
> Gualterus
>

<LOL>

Guess I am feeling better when I'm looking at the old textbooks.

However, thinking about it, the whole perception of our Laws is a
little Schizo ;-)

Vale - Venator
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67715 From: A. Sempronius Regulus Date: 2009-06-21
Subject: Re: nova roma is syncretic
Salve,
In terms of internet alteration, it should be detectable (especially, Wiki). Why you ask me I have no idea.

--- On Sat, 6/20/09, Gaius Equitius Cato <catoinnyc@...> wrote:

From: Gaius Equitius Cato <catoinnyc@...>
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: nova roma is syncretic
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Date: Saturday, June 20, 2009, 9:43 PM

Cato Sempronio Regulo sal.

Salve.

I believe the Jews were thrown out of at least the City of Rome several times as well.

Also, here in the Respblica we contain within our own time frame everything up to the removal of the Altar of Victory from the Senate, I believe, which post-dates Constantine the Great by about a century.

Curiously, our opening remarks on the wiki site have been changed, so thatthey now read (in incredibly ungrammatical fashion):

"From its founding to 330 CE, when it ceased to be the center of Imperial authority, Rome laid the foundation for our modern Western civilization. "

Thank goodness our Constitution has not been so vandalized, and it reads:

"...defined as the period from the founding of the City of Rome in 753 BCE to the removal of the altar of Victory from the Senate in 394 CE..."

I do not know who changed the wording of our opening statement or why, but would be interested in knowing. Can we find out when and who and why this was altered to read this way?

Vale,

Cato

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com, "A. Sempronius Regulus" <asempronius. regulus@. ..> wrote:
>
> Salve,
>  
> I wouldn't say in ancient Rome all religions were equal. First, foreign deities and cults did not have templum augurially aligned to the heavens for their cella. They just an a surveyed piece of land or fanum. Second, cults that did not recognize the state cult or public cult were not tolerated. Third, cults that appeared to threaten the state were suppressed. The philosophers were thrown out of Rome at one point and Bacchus-Dionysos had issues with the Senate. Basically, cults that did not challenge the public cult of the state were tolerated.
>  
> Vale,
> A. Sempronius Regulus
>  
>  
>
> --- On Sat, 6/20/09, Maior <rory12001@. ..> wrote:
>
>
> From: Maior <rory12001@. ..>
> Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: nova roma is syncretic
> To: Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com
> Date: Saturday, June 20, 2009, 7:41 PM
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> -Salvete;
> I was speaking of all culti,Judaism, Zoroastrianism, Isis worshippers, Pythagoreans.
>
> the Romans during the Republic did not have the concept of religious heretics. During the Empire up to Constantine, which the religio here in Nova Roma follows, there wasn't such a concept. There are no heresies and no heretics in Nova Roma.


Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67716 From: Gnaeus Iulius Caesar Date: 2009-06-21
Subject: Re: My Statement of Opposition to the Intercessio!
Cn Iulius Caesar Consuli SPD

Regarding the forwarding of an intercessio here is what you said in the trial of Cincinnatus in respect of accepting a statement from Decius Iunius Palladius Invictus presented by T. Galerius Paulinus, both consulars, one a former censor the other censor. Clearly rank and past service had no sway on your decision then. You refused to accept a fowarded message. You insisted that Palladius forward it himself, and until he did that was your decision. Double standards now Consul?

You said:

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Novaromatribunalis/message/273

Praetor M. Curiatius SPD

I do not know whether I can really accept this statement, the norm would be:

1. The lawyer had informed the court that he would be submitting a statement
of a third person

2. The declarant had sent his statement to the court personally and directly

As the statement was made, I doubt his veracity and his author

In addition, the witnesses must be called before the court to present his
statement and to may be questioned by the other party.

Therefore I not acept this statement as it is done.

Vale

M.CVRIATIVS.COMPLVTENSIS
PRÆTOR NOVÆ ROMÆ

and then:

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Novaromatribunalis/message/275

Praetor M. Curiatius SPD

Decius Iunius sent to me directy his statement and now I accept it.

Valete

M.CVRIATIVS.COMPLVTENSIS
PRÆTOR NOVÆ ROMÆ

----------------------

I wait with baited breath to see how you justify demanding in person trnasmission then, but accepting it now. I am sure you will wriggle out of this somehow. Are we not by your own ruling entitled to expect you apply the same standards to yourself? Are we not entitled to doubt the veracity and authorship of this forwarded message, or is that justa right reserved to yourself?

Optime vale


--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Gnaeus Iulius Caesar" <gn_iulius_caesar@...> wrote:
>
> Cn Iulius Caesar Consuli SPD.
>
> Well by my math the 72 hours was up at 4.29am CET. Appius Galerius Aurelianus saw fit to post his response later. A congratulatory note can hardly be considered a definitive agreement, and as for the note
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67717 From: A. Sempronius Regulus Date: 2009-06-21
Subject: Re: Modianus was elected Censor by the people
Salve,
Cato, I knew you were Orthodox back in 2005. Since then, you have repeatedly confirmed that. Your Orthodoxy was not the point. It was whether you were
 
a. closet roman catholic,
b. uniate,
c. convert.
 
You don't strike me as cradle-born. That (c) is the question. A great many of your posts say, in effect, if not possibly a or b, then c.
 
Vale,
A. Sempronius Regulus

--- On Sat, 6/20/09, Gaius Equitius Cato <catoinnyc@...> wrote:

From: Gaius Equitius Cato <catoinnyc@...>
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Modianus was elected Censor by the people
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Date: Saturday, June 20, 2009, 2:16 AM

Cato Sempronio Regulo sal.

Salve.

You are right there, and I apologize. I have to stop acting as if speaking to you is the same as speaking to ... anyone else.

I thoroughly agree with your details regarding the ancient Romans *and* the idea of "tradition". What I mean to say is that while these *should* be the guide-posts by which our laws are measured, unfortunately they are not right now, and because we are bound by a set of rules which differ in many instances quite dramatically from the ancient Romans, we cannot look to them for specifics in this case. We can change that if we truly want to, and I have advocated doing so for some time now.

I have also been attempting, with others (including Coruncanius Cato, Fabius Maximus, Flavius Aquila, Cornelius Sulla, and a couple of others), to try several different approaches to making exactly the kind of Roman tradition of which you speak a more viable route for our legal system.

Vale,

Cato

P.S. - yes, in spite of what you might have thought, I am in fact an Orthodox Christian in my private cultus :) GEC

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com, "A. Sempronius Regulus" <asempronius. regulus@. ..> wrote:
>
> Salve,
>  
> You still go to extremes posing an either/or dilemma. I have sometimes suspected you were a closet Roman Catholic, Uniate, or convert to Orthodoxy. I'm reminded of that again.
>  
> Let me try one word that a cradle-born Orthodox would understand in terms of the "constitution" : Tradition. Hopefully that will correct what seems a misperception on your part.
>  
> Vale,
> A. Sempronius Regulus


Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67718 From: Q. Valerius Poplicola Date: 2009-06-21
Subject: Re: Digest Number 4586 - Some observations from the peanut gallery
Learn to use a dictionary, noob. The secondary definition is NOT the primary definition, nor does it always translate over.

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "lathyrus77" <lathyrus77@...> wrote:
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Gaius Equitius Cato" <catoinnyc@> wrote:
> >
> > Cato Annae sal.
> >
> > Salve.
> >
> > Well, this is indicative of the basic problem we have here; again, their *words* are not sacrosanct, their *persons* are.
> >
> >
>
> You need to pick a new word.
>
> Sacrosanct
> Function:
> adjective
> Etymology:
> Latin sacrosanctus, probably from sacro sanctus hallowed by a sacred rite
> Date:
> 1601
>
> 1 : most sacred or holy : inviolable 2 : treated as if holy : immune from criticism or violation <politically sacrosanct programs>
>
>
> Immune from criticism or violation, cato.
>
> -Anna
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67719 From: Q. Valerius Poplicola Date: 2009-06-21
Subject: Re: My Statement of Opposition to the Intercessio!
AKA: We don't care about the law, we'll do as we please, we always have, and we always will.

Even Appius Galerius accepted that he was late. What proof do you have that he was on time?

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, M·CVR·COMPLVTENSIS <complutensis@...> wrote:
>
> Here is the Consular response.
>
> Tribunus Appius Gaslerius Aurelianus showed his disagreement with the
> intercessio on time. Tribunus Appius Galerius Aurelianus congratuled the
> Censor elected Fabius Buteo Modianus.
>
> This message is only the confirmation of a previous act to avoid
> misunderstandings.
>
> 2 Tribunes agree with the intercessio and 2 Tribunes disagree.
>
> End of the question
>
> Vale et valete
>
>
> M·CVRIATIVS·COMPLVTENSIS
> CONSVL NOVAE ROMAE
> CONSVL HISPANIAE
>
> NOVA ROMA
>
> -------------------------------------------
>
> ex paucis multa, ex minimis maxima
>
>
> 2009/6/21 Gnaeus Iulius Caesar <gn_iulius_caesar@...>
>
> >
> >
> > Cn. Iulius Caesar SPD.
> >
> > Well, the intercessio survives. I await with interest the consular
> > response.
> >
> > Optime valete
> >
> >
> > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com <Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com>, "Gnaeus
> > Iulius Caesar" <gn_iulius_caesar@> wrote:
> > >
> > > Cn Iulius Caesar Ap. Galerio Aureliano SPD
> > >
> > > Yes I think so. The deadine was 8.29 pm Mountain Time or 4.29 am CET.
> > >
> > > Optime vale
> >
> >
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67720 From: L Julia Aquila Date: 2009-06-21
Subject: Re: nova roma is syncretic
Salve Cato,

I just looked at the first post in this thread and it was:
"Re: Protecting Our Votes and Future Elections" (with the RE:) started by Poplicola. It was later changed to "Re: nova roma is syncretic."
The original title of the thread will still show when you open to read a post even thought the subject line is changed - I had to create a new "Poetry [...] etc." thread because it still read for "[...]Dies Nefastus" when a post was opened to read even though I changed it in the subject line.
Hope that helps and that is what you are referring to;)

Btw, although it makes no difference to me either way, I am also wondering if you were raised a Roman Catholic also.

Vale,
Julia


--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "A. Sempronius Regulus" <asempronius.regulus@...> wrote:
>
> Salve,
> In terms of internet alteration, it should be detectable (especially, Wiki).. Why you ask me I have no idea.
>
> --- On Sat, 6/20/09, Gaius Equitius Cato <catoinnyc@...> wrote:
>
>
> From: Gaius Equitius Cato <catoinnyc@...>
> Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: nova roma is syncretic
> To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> Date: Saturday, June 20, 2009, 9:43 PM
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Cato Sempronio Regulo sal.
>
> Salve.
>
> I believe the Jews were thrown out of at least the City of Rome several times as well.
>
> Also, here in the Respblica we contain within our own time frame everything up to the removal of the Altar of Victory from the Senate, I believe, which post-dates Constantine the Great by about a century.
>
> Curiously, our opening remarks on the wiki site have been changed, so thatthey now read (in incredibly ungrammatical fashion):
>
> "From its founding to 330 CE, when it ceased to be the center of Imperial authority, Rome laid the foundation for our modern Western civilization. "
>
> Thank goodness our Constitution has not been so vandalized, and it reads:
>
> "...defined as the period from the founding of the City of Rome in 753 BCE to the removal of the altar of Victory from the Senate in 394 CE..."
>
> I do not know who changed the wording of our opening statement or why, but would be interested in knowing. Can we find out when and who and why this was altered to read this way?
>
> Vale,
>
> Cato
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com, "A. Sempronius Regulus" <asempronius. regulus@ ..> wrote:
> >
> > Salve,
> >  
> > I wouldn't say in ancient Rome all religions were equal. First, foreign deities and cults did not have templum augurially aligned to the heavens for their cella. They just an a surveyed piece of land or fanum. Second, cults that did not recognize the state cult or public cult were not tolerated. Third, cults that appeared to threaten the state were suppressed. The philosophers were thrown out of Rome at one point and Bacchus-Dionysos had issues with the Senate. Basically, cults that did not challenge the public cult of the state were tolerated.
> >  
> > Vale,
> > A. Sempronius Regulus
> >  
> >  
> >
> > --- On Sat, 6/20/09, Maior <rory12001@ ..> wrote:
> >
> >
> > From: Maior <rory12001@ ..>
> > Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: nova roma is syncretic
> > To: Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com
> > Date: Saturday, June 20, 2009, 7:41 PM
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > -Salvete;
> > I was speaking of all culti,Judaism, Zoroastrianism, Isis worshippers, Pythagoreans.
> >
> > the Romans during the Republic did not have the concept of religious heretics. During the Empire up to Constantine, which the religio here in Nova Roma follows, there wasn't such a concept. There are no heresies and no heretics in Nova Roma.
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67721 From: Gaius Equitius Cato Date: 2009-06-21
Subject: Re: nova roma is syncretic
Cato Iuliae Aquilae sal.

Salve!

Atually, it's the opening statement on our wiki page that concerns me, found here:

http://www.novaroma.org/nr/Main_Page

The opening remarks are jarringly ungrammatical.

As to the other, I was raised a mix of Roman Catholic and Sicilian Superstitious with a side of Anglicanism :)

In my mid-thirties, after several years of agnosticism, I started back in the Anglican Church but eventually converted to Orthodoxy.

Vale,

Cato




--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "L Julia Aquila" <dis_pensible@...> wrote:
>
> Salve Cato,
>
> I just looked at the first post in this thread and it was:
> "Re: Protecting Our Votes and Future Elections" (with the RE:) started by Poplicola. It was later changed to "Re: nova roma is syncretic."
> The original title of the thread will still show when you open to read a post even thought the subject line is changed - I had to create a new "Poetry [...] etc." thread because it still read for "[...]Dies Nefastus" when a post was opened to read even though I changed it in the subject line.
> Hope that helps and that is what you are referring to;)
>
> Btw, although it makes no difference to me either way, I am also wondering if you were raised a Roman Catholic also.
>
> Vale,
> Julia
>
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "A. Sempronius Regulus" <asempronius.regulus@> wrote:
> >
> > Salve,
> > In terms of internet alteration, it should be detectable (especially, Wiki).. Why you ask me I have no idea.
> >
> > --- On Sat, 6/20/09, Gaius Equitius Cato <catoinnyc@> wrote:
> >
> >
> > From: Gaius Equitius Cato <catoinnyc@>
> > Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: nova roma is syncretic
> > To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> > Date: Saturday, June 20, 2009, 9:43 PM
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Cato Sempronio Regulo sal.
> >
> > Salve.
> >
> > I believe the Jews were thrown out of at least the City of Rome several times as well.
> >
> > Also, here in the Respblica we contain within our own time frame everything up to the removal of the Altar of Victory from the Senate, I believe, which post-dates Constantine the Great by about a century.
> >
> > Curiously, our opening remarks on the wiki site have been changed, so thatthey now read (in incredibly ungrammatical fashion):
> >
> > "From its founding to 330 CE, when it ceased to be the center of Imperial authority, Rome laid the foundation for our modern Western civilization. "
> >
> > Thank goodness our Constitution has not been so vandalized, and it reads:
> >
> > "...defined as the period from the founding of the City of Rome in 753 BCE to the removal of the altar of Victory from the Senate in 394 CE..."
> >
> > I do not know who changed the wording of our opening statement or why, but would be interested in knowing. Can we find out when and who and why this was altered to read this way?
> >
> > Vale,
> >
> > Cato
> >
> > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com, "A. Sempronius Regulus" <asempronius. regulus@ ..> wrote:
> > >
> > > Salve,
> > >  
> > > I wouldn't say in ancient Rome all religions were equal. First, foreign deities and cults did not have templum augurially aligned to the heavens for their cella. They just an a surveyed piece of land or fanum. Second, cults that did not recognize the state cult or public cult were not tolerated. Third, cults that appeared to threaten the state were suppressed. The philosophers were thrown out of Rome at one point and Bacchus-Dionysos had issues with the Senate. Basically, cults that did not challenge the public cult of the state were tolerated.
> > >  
> > > Vale,
> > > A. Sempronius Regulus
> > >  
> > >  
> > >
> > > --- On Sat, 6/20/09, Maior <rory12001@ ..> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > From: Maior <rory12001@ ..>
> > > Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: nova roma is syncretic
> > > To: Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com
> > > Date: Saturday, June 20, 2009, 7:41 PM
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > -Salvete;
> > > I was speaking of all culti,Judaism, Zoroastrianism, Isis worshippers, Pythagoreans.
> > >
> > > the Romans during the Republic did not have the concept of religious heretics. During the Empire up to Constantine, which the religio here in Nova Roma follows, there wasn't such a concept. There are no heresies and no heretics in Nova Roma.
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67722 From: Maior Date: 2009-06-21
Subject: Re: nova roma is syncretic
Salvete;
Agricola just told me that Vedius wrote it plus a zillion other people, so blame Vedius for the bad grammar;-) And then the Senate took notice and a Senate subcommittee is suspposed to be on it. Cato is a Senator, so he is imputed to know all about it. I never paid any attention.

No way that Agricola who has an MA in practical linguistics would have bad grammar..lol
Maior
>
> Cato Iuliae Aquilae sal.
>
> Salve!
>
> Atually, it's the opening statement on our wiki page that concerns me, found here:
>
> http://www.novaroma.org/nr/Main_Page
>
> The opening remarks are jarringly ungrammatical.
>
> As to the other, I was raised a mix of Roman Catholic and Sicilian Superstitious with a side of Anglicanism :)
>
> In my mid-thirties, after several years of agnosticism, I started back in the Anglican Church but eventually converted to Orthodoxy.
>
> Vale,
>
> Cato
>
>
>
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "L Julia Aquila" <dis_pensible@> wrote:
> >
> > Salve Cato,
> >
> > I just looked at the first post in this thread and it was:
> > "Re: Protecting Our Votes and Future Elections" (with the RE:) started by Poplicola. It was later changed to "Re: nova roma is syncretic."
> > The original title of the thread will still show when you open to read a post even thought the subject line is changed - I had to create a new "Poetry [...] etc." thread because it still read for "[...]Dies Nefastus" when a post was opened to read even though I changed it in the subject line.
> > Hope that helps and that is what you are referring to;)
> >
> > Btw, although it makes no difference to me either way, I am also wondering if you were raised a Roman Catholic also.
> >
> > Vale,
> > Julia
> >
> >
> > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "A. Sempronius Regulus" <asempronius.regulus@> wrote:
> > >
> > > Salve,
> > > In terms of internet alteration, it should be detectable (especially, Wiki).. Why you ask me I have no idea.
> > >
> > > --- On Sat, 6/20/09, Gaius Equitius Cato <catoinnyc@> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > From: Gaius Equitius Cato <catoinnyc@>
> > > Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: nova roma is syncretic
> > > To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> > > Date: Saturday, June 20, 2009, 9:43 PM
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Cato Sempronio Regulo sal.
> > >
> > > Salve.
> > >
> > > I believe the Jews were thrown out of at least the City of Rome several times as well.
> > >
> > > Also, here in the Respblica we contain within our own time frame everything up to the removal of the Altar of Victory from the Senate, I believe, which post-dates Constantine the Great by about a century.
> > >
> > > Curiously, our opening remarks on the wiki site have been changed, so thatthey now read (in incredibly ungrammatical fashion):
> > >
> > > "From its founding to 330 CE, when it ceased to be the center of Imperial authority, Rome laid the foundation for our modern Western civilization. "
> > >
> > > Thank goodness our Constitution has not been so vandalized, and it reads:
> > >
> > > "...defined as the period from the founding of the City of Rome in 753 BCE to the removal of the altar of Victory from the Senate in 394 CE..."
> > >
> > > I do not know who changed the wording of our opening statement or why, but would be interested in knowing. Can we find out when and who and why this was altered to read this way?
> > >
> > > Vale,
> > >
> > > Cato
> > >
> > > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com, "A. Sempronius Regulus" <asempronius. regulus@ ..> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Salve,
> > > >  
> > > > I wouldn't say in ancient Rome all religions were equal. First, foreign deities and cults did not have templum augurially aligned to the heavens for their cella. They just an a surveyed piece of land or fanum. Second, cults that did not recognize the state cult or public cult were not tolerated. Third, cults that appeared to threaten the state were suppressed. The philosophers were thrown out of Rome at one point and Bacchus-Dionysos had issues with the Senate. Basically, cults that did not challenge the public cult of the state were tolerated.
> > > >  
> > > > Vale,
> > > > A. Sempronius Regulus
> > > >  
> > > >  
> > > >
> > > > --- On Sat, 6/20/09, Maior <rory12001@ ..> wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > From: Maior <rory12001@ ..>
> > > > Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: nova roma is syncretic
> > > > To: Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com
> > > > Date: Saturday, June 20, 2009, 7:41 PM
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > -Salvete;
> > > > I was speaking of all culti,Judaism, Zoroastrianism, Isis worshippers, Pythagoreans.
> > > >
> > > > the Romans during the Republic did not have the concept of religious heretics. During the Empire up to Constantine, which the religio here in Nova Roma follows, there wasn't such a concept. There are no heresies and no heretics in Nova Roma.
> > >
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 67723 From: lathyrus77 Date: 2009-06-21
Subject: Re: Digest Number 4586 - Some observations from the peanut gallery
--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Gaius Equitius Cato" <catoinnyc@...> wrote:
>
> Cato Annae sal.
>
> Salve.
>
> "shut up about it"...
>
> And this is indicative of the level to which you wish to take the conversation. Very nicely done.
>

Oh I'm sorry perhaps I should call you a political tramp of a christian and maybe you'll find that more appealing.



>
> I cannot think of a way to make this clearer.
>


Perhaps if you stopped misusing the word sacrosanct.

-Anna