Selected messages in Nova-Roma group. Oct 11-22, 2009

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71071 From: luciaiuliaaquila Date: 2009-10-11
Subject: Re: Classic Poetry, Prose, Proems, Literature Excerpts
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71072 From: Cato Date: 2009-10-12
Subject: Re: Latin phrase of the day.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71073 From: Cato Date: 2009-10-12
Subject: Re: Classic Poetry, Prose, Proems, Literature Excerpts
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71074 From: Cato Date: 2009-10-12
Subject: a.d. IV Id. Oct.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71075 From: Nero Date: 2009-10-12
Subject: Re: Roman Medicine
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71076 From: Timothy or Stephen Gallagher Date: 2009-10-12
Subject: The Latin Phrase of the Day
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71077 From: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com Date: 2009-10-12
Subject: Posting rules in this Forum, 10/12/2009, 11:45 pm
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71078 From: Cato Date: 2009-10-13
Subject: a.d. III Id. Oct.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71079 From: Maxima Valeria Messallina Date: 2009-10-13
Subject: Re: Maior and the BA
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71080 From: Maxima Valeria Messallina Date: 2009-10-13
Subject: Re: Ethics
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71081 From: Cato Date: 2009-10-13
Subject: Re: Ethics
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71082 From: David Kling Date: 2009-10-13
Subject: Re: Ethics
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71083 From: Kirsteen Wright Date: 2009-10-13
Subject: Re: Maior and the BA
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71084 From: Maxima Valeria Messallina Date: 2009-10-13
Subject: Re: Ethics
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71085 From: rory12001 Date: 2009-10-13
Subject: Re: Maior and the BA
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71086 From: Maxima Valeria Messallina Date: 2009-10-13
Subject: Re: Maior and the BA
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71087 From: Cato Date: 2009-10-13
Subject: Re: Ethics
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71088 From: Cato Date: 2009-10-13
Subject: Re: Maior and the BA
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71089 From: Cato Date: 2009-10-13
Subject: Re: Ethics
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71090 From: rory12001 Date: 2009-10-13
Subject: Re: The BA [was Maior and the BA]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71091 From: Maxima Valeria Messallina Date: 2009-10-13
Subject: Re: Ethics
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71092 From: Gnaeus Iulius Caesar Date: 2009-10-13
Subject: Re: The BA [was Maior and the BA]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71093 From: Cato Date: 2009-10-13
Subject: Re: Ethics
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71094 From: David Kling Date: 2009-10-13
Subject: Re: Maior and the BA
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71095 From: Cato Date: 2009-10-13
Subject: Re: Maior and the BA
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71098 From: David Kling Date: 2009-10-13
Subject: Re: Maior and the BA
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71099 From: Publius Ullerius Stephanus Venator Date: 2009-10-13
Subject: Re: Maior and the BA
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71100 From: luciaiuliaaquila Date: 2009-10-13
Subject: Re: Maior and the BA
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71101 From: luciaiuliaaquila Date: 2009-10-13
Subject: Re: Books are ( fill in the blank)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71102 From: luciaiuliaaquila Date: 2009-10-13
Subject: Re: Classic Poetry, Prose, Proems, Literature Excerpts
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71103 From: luciaiuliaaquila Date: 2009-10-13
Subject: Re: Latin phrase of the day.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71104 From: luciaiuliaaquila Date: 2009-10-13
Subject: Ancient Roman Shade
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71105 From: luciaiuliaaquila Date: 2009-10-13
Subject: Re: Classic Poetry, Prose, Proems, Literature Excerpts
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71106 From: luciaiuliaaquila Date: 2009-10-13
Subject: Re: Roman Medicine
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71107 From: luciaiuliaaquila Date: 2009-10-13
Subject: Re: Roman Medicine
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71108 From: luciaiuliaaquila Date: 2009-10-13
Subject: Re: Latin phrase of the day.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71109 From: gualterus_graecus Date: 2009-10-13
Subject: Re: Classic Poetry, Prose, Proems, Literature Excerpts
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71110 From: luciaiuliaaquila Date: 2009-10-13
Subject: Re: Classic Poetry, Prose, Proems, Literature Excerpts
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71111 From: Cato Date: 2009-10-13
Subject: Re: Classic Poetry, Prose, Proems, Literature Excerpts
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71112 From: Timothy or Stephen Gallagher Date: 2009-10-13
Subject: Re: Books are ( fill in the blank)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71113 From: luciaiuliaaquila Date: 2009-10-13
Subject: Re: Classic Poetry, Prose, Proems, Literature Excerpts
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71114 From: luciaiuliaaquila Date: 2009-10-13
Subject: Re: Books are ( fill in the blank)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71115 From: Cato Date: 2009-10-14
Subject: prid. Id. Oct.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71116 From: Cato Date: 2009-10-14
Subject: Re: Classic Poetry, Prose, Proems, Literature Excerpts
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71117 From: Timothy or Stephen Gallagher Date: 2009-10-14
Subject: Larin Phrase of the Day
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71118 From: shantipole2001 Date: 2009-10-14
Subject: I want to get involved but...
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71119 From: rory12001 Date: 2009-10-14
Subject: Re: I want to get involved but...
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71120 From: luciaiuliaaquila Date: 2009-10-14
Subject: Re: Classic Poetry, Prose, Proems, Literature Excerpts
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71121 From: Cato Date: 2009-10-14
Subject: Re: Classic Poetry, Prose, Proems, Literature Excerpts
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71122 From: luciaiuliaaquila Date: 2009-10-14
Subject: Re: Classic Poetry, Prose, Proems, Literature Excerpts
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71123 From: Cn. Cornelius Lentulus Date: 2009-10-14
Subject: R: [Nova-Roma] I want to get involved but...
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71124 From: livia_plauta Date: 2009-10-14
Subject: Re: Ancient Roman Shade
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71125 From: livia_plauta Date: 2009-10-14
Subject: Re: Classic Poetry, Prose, Proems, Literature Excerpts
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71126 From: livia_plauta Date: 2009-10-14
Subject: To the tribunes
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71127 From: shantipole2001 Date: 2009-10-14
Subject: Re: R: [Nova-Roma] I want to get involved but...
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71128 From: Maxima Valeria Messallina Date: 2009-10-14
Subject: Re: R: [Nova-Roma] I want to get involved but...
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71129 From: Colin Brodd Date: 2009-10-14
Subject: Re: R: [Nova-Roma] I want to get involved but...
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71130 From: Cato Date: 2009-10-14
Subject: Re: R: [Nova-Roma] I want to get involved but...
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71131 From: rory12001 Date: 2009-10-15
Subject: Re: R: [Nova-Roma] I want to get involved but...
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71132 From: Shoshana Hathaway Date: 2009-10-15
Subject: boods ae ...
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71133 From: rory12001 Date: 2009-10-15
Subject: Re: To the tribunes
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71134 From: mcorvvs Date: 2009-10-15
Subject: Re: Ides ritual performed by Sacerdos Iovis M.Octavius Corvus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71135 From: Cato Date: 2009-10-15
Subject: Id. Oct.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71136 From: Cato Date: 2009-10-15
Subject: Re: R: [Nova-Roma] I want to get involved but...
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71137 From: David Kling Date: 2009-10-15
Subject: Re: R: [Nova-Roma] I want to get involved but...
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71138 From: shantipole2001 Date: 2009-10-15
Subject: Re: R: [Nova-Roma] I want to get involved but...
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71139 From: shantipole2001 Date: 2009-10-15
Subject: participating in real-world politics as an international "culture an
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71140 From: Cato Date: 2009-10-15
Subject: Re: R: [Nova-Roma] I want to get involved but...
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71141 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2009-10-15
Subject: Re: participating in real-world politics as an international "cultur
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71142 From: Cato Date: 2009-10-15
Subject: Re: participating in real-world politics as an international "cultur
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71143 From: luciaiuliaaquila Date: 2009-10-15
Subject: Re: participating in real-world politics as an international "cultur
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71144 From: David Kling Date: 2009-10-15
Subject: Re: R: [Nova-Roma] I want to get involved but...
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71145 From: David Kling Date: 2009-10-15
Subject: Re: participating in real-world politics as an international "cultur
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71146 From: luciaiuliaaquila Date: 2009-10-15
Subject: Re: Ides ritual performed by Sacerdos Iovis M.Octavius Corvus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71147 From: luciaiuliaaquila Date: 2009-10-15
Subject: Re: Ancient Roman Shade
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71148 From: luciaiuliaaquila Date: 2009-10-15
Subject: Re: Classic Poetry, Prose, Proems, Literature Excerpts
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71149 From: luciaiuliaaquila Date: 2009-10-15
Subject: Re: Classic Poetry, Prose, Proems, Literature Excerpts
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71150 From: luciaiuliaaquila Date: 2009-10-16
Subject: Re: R: [Nova-Roma] I want to get involved but...
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71151 From: rory12001 Date: 2009-10-16
Subject: Re: R: [Nova-Roma] I want to get involved but...
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71152 From: Timothy or Stephen Gallagher Date: 2009-10-16
Subject: The Latin Phrase of the Day
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71153 From: Cato Date: 2009-10-16
Subject: a.d. XVIII Kal. Nov.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71154 From: M.C.C. Date: 2009-10-16
Subject: MEMENTO: TO ALL PROVINCIAL GOVERNORS
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71155 From: M.C.C. Date: 2009-10-16
Subject: SECOND CALL FOR CANDIDATES
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71156 From: shantipole2001 Date: 2009-10-16
Subject: Re: R: [Nova-Roma] I want to get involved but...
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71157 From: shantipole2001 Date: 2009-10-16
Subject: Re: participating in real-world politics as an international "cultur
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71158 From: Cato Date: 2009-10-16
Subject: Re: SECOND CALL FOR CANDIDATES
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71159 From: M.C.C. Date: 2009-10-16
Subject: Re: SECOND CALL FOR CANDIDATES
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71160 From: Maxima Valeria Messallina Date: 2009-10-16
Subject: Re: R: [Nova-Roma] I want to get involved but...
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71161 From: Maxima Valeria Messallina Date: 2009-10-16
Subject: Re: R: [Nova-Roma] I want to get involved but...
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71162 From: David Kling Date: 2009-10-16
Subject: Re: SECOND CALL FOR CANDIDATES
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71163 From: Maxima Valeria Messallina Date: 2009-10-16
Subject: Re: R: [Nova-Roma] I want to get involved but...
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71164 From: Colin Brodd Date: 2009-10-16
Subject: Re: R: [Nova-Roma] I want to get involved but...
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71165 From: Cato Date: 2009-10-16
Subject: Re: SECOND CALL FOR CANDIDATES
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71166 From: Shoshana Hathaway Date: 2009-10-16
Subject: Re: R: [Nova-Roma] I want to get involved but...
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71167 From: David Kling Date: 2009-10-16
Subject: Re: SECOND CALL FOR CANDIDATES
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71168 From: Associazione Pomerium Date: 2009-10-16
Subject: 24 ottobre: le tombe della Via Latina, a Roma
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71169 From: rory12001 Date: 2009-10-16
Subject: Re: SECOND CALL FOR CANDIDATES
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71170 From: Cato Date: 2009-10-16
Subject: Re: SECOND CALL FOR CANDIDATES
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71171 From: annaevsregvlvs Date: 2009-10-16
Subject: Candidacy for Curule Aedile
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71172 From: Patrick O Date: 2009-10-17
Subject: SENATE CALL
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71173 From: Shoshana Hathaway Date: 2009-10-17
Subject: announcement of dandidacy
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71174 From: Patrick O Date: 2009-10-17
Subject: Re: Announcement of candidacy for Quaestor - C. Maria Caeca
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71175 From: Shoshana Hathaway Date: 2009-10-17
Subject: Re: Announcement of candidacy for Quaestor - C. Maria Caeca
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71176 From: Steve Moore Date: 2009-10-17
Subject: Resignation
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71177 From: Cato Date: 2009-10-17
Subject: a.d. XVI Kal. Nov.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71178 From: David Kling Date: 2009-10-17
Subject: Re: SECOND CALL FOR CANDIDATES
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71179 From: Maxima Valeria Messallina Date: 2009-10-17
Subject: More on the Hypatia movie
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71180 From: Maxima Valeria Messallina Date: 2009-10-17
Subject: Re: announcement of candidacy
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71181 From: Publius Ullerius Stephanus Venator Date: 2009-10-17
Subject: Re: [BackAlley] Resignation
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71182 From: Shoshana Hathaway Date: 2009-10-17
Subject: Re: announcement of candidacy
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71183 From: luciaiuliaaquila Date: 2009-10-17
Subject: Re: R: [Nova-Roma] I want to get involved but...
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71184 From: Patrick O Date: 2009-10-17
Subject: CALL FOR PLEBEIAN CANDIDATES
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71185 From: Maxima Valeria Messallina Date: 2009-10-17
Subject: Re: R: [Nova-Roma] I want to get involved but...
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71186 From: RG Date: 2009-10-17
Subject: Join us at our Military History Group
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71187 From: Cato Date: 2009-10-18
Subject: a.d. XV Kal. Nov.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71188 From: Timothy or Stephen Gallagher Date: 2009-10-18
Subject: The Latin Phrase of the Day
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71189 From: Timothy or Stephen Gallagher Date: 2009-10-18
Subject: Asterix is 50!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71190 From: publiusalbucius Date: 2009-10-18
Subject: Re: Asterix is 50!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71191 From: Aqvillivs Date: 2009-10-18
Subject: Thesis: ROMAN LEGIONS LOOKED DIFFERENT
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71192 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2009-10-18
Subject: Re: Thesis: ROMAN LEGIONS LOOKED DIFFERENT
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71193 From: Aqvillivs Date: 2009-10-18
Subject: Re: Thesis: ROMAN LEGIONS LOOKED DIFFERENT
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71194 From: rory12001 Date: 2009-10-18
Subject: the Saturnalia thread
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71195 From: Publius Ullerius Stephanus Venator Date: 2009-10-18
Subject: Re: Thesis: ROMAN LEGIONS LOOKED DIFFERENT
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71196 From: Marcus Audens Date: 2009-10-18
Subject: "Roman Times Quarterly" (RTQ)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71197 From: QFabiusMaxmi@aol.com Date: 2009-10-19
Subject: Re: Thesis: ROMAN LEGIONS LOOKED DIFFERENT
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71198 From: Cato Date: 2009-10-19
Subject: a.d. XIV Kal. Nov.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71199 From: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com Date: 2009-10-19
Subject: Posting rules in this Forum, 10/19/2009, 11:45 pm
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71200 From: Cn. Cornelius Lentulus Date: 2009-10-20
Subject: R: [Nova-Roma] Resignation
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71201 From: Cn. Cornelius Lentulus Date: 2009-10-20
Subject: Maria Caeca For Quaestor!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71202 From: Cato Date: 2009-10-20
Subject: a.d XIII Kal. Nov.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71203 From: C. Curius Saturninus Date: 2009-10-20
Subject: Call for contributors and volunteers for a project about Roman Gods
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71204 From: luciaiuliaaquila Date: 2009-10-20
Subject: Invitation to Temple Of Venus et Dedication!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71205 From: C.Maria Caeca Date: 2009-10-20
Subject: test, sorry!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71206 From: Charlie Collins Date: 2009-10-20
Subject: Re: test, sorry!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71207 From: C.Maria Caeca Date: 2009-10-20
Subject: Re: test, sorry!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71208 From: Publius Ullerius Stephanus Venator Date: 2009-10-20
Subject: Re: test, sorry!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71209 From: Publius Ullerius Stephanus Venator Date: 2009-10-20
Subject: Another Latin Phrase of the Day
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71210 From: C.Maria Caeca Date: 2009-10-20
Subject: Re: Maria Caeca For Quaestor!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71211 From: A. Sempronius Regulus Date: 2009-10-20
Subject: Re: Ancient Roman Shade
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71212 From: A. Sempronius Regulus Date: 2009-10-20
Subject: Re: More on the Hypatia movie
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71213 From: A. Sempronius Regulus Date: 2009-10-20
Subject: Sigh -- Smile And Economics of late paganism/Xtianism
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71214 From: A. Sempronius Regulus Date: 2009-10-20
Subject: Re: Sigh -- Smile And Economics of late paganism/Xtianism
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71215 From: C.Maria Caeca Date: 2009-10-20
Subject: Re: Sigh -- Smile And Economics of late paganism/Xtianism
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71216 From: gualterus_graecus Date: 2009-10-21
Subject: Re: Sigh -- Smile And Economics of late paganism/Xtianism
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71217 From: Cato Date: 2009-10-21
Subject: a.d. XII Kal. Nov.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71218 From: David Kling Date: 2009-10-21
Subject: Re: Ancient Roman Shade
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71219 From: Cn. Cornelius Lentulus Date: 2009-10-21
Subject: Latin Films
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71220 From: Lucius Iulius Regulus Date: 2009-10-21
Subject: Athenaeum, Ancient Roman Auditorium Unveiled
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71221 From: T. Annaeus Regulus Date: 2009-10-21
Subject: Re: Sigh -- Smile And Economics of late paganism/Xtianism
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71222 From: A. Sempronius Regulus Date: 2009-10-21
Subject: Re: Ancient Roman Shade
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71223 From: A. Sempronius Regulus Date: 2009-10-21
Subject: Re: Sigh -- Smile And Economics of late paganism/Xtianism
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71224 From: Associazione Pomerium Date: 2009-10-21
Subject: Notiziario POMERIVM #22, Ottobre 2009
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71225 From: rory12001 Date: 2009-10-21
Subject: Re: Sigh -- Smile And Economics of late paganism/Xtianism
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71226 From: livia_plauta Date: 2009-10-21
Subject: Re: Sigh -- Smile And Economics of late paganism/Xtianism
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71227 From: A. Sempronius Regulus Date: 2009-10-21
Subject: Poplicola
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71228 From: A. Sempronius Regulus Date: 2009-10-21
Subject: Re: Sigh -- Smile And Economics of late paganism/Xtianism
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71229 From: David Kling Date: 2009-10-21
Subject: Re: Ancient Roman Shade
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71230 From: A. Sempronius Regulus Date: 2009-10-21
Subject: Re: Ancient Roman Shade
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71231 From: A. Sempronius Regulus Date: 2009-10-21
Subject: Re: Sigh -- Smile And Economics of late paganism/Xtianism
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71232 From: David Kling Date: 2009-10-21
Subject: Re: Ancient Roman Shade
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71233 From: T. Annaeus Regulus Date: 2009-10-21
Subject: Re: Sigh -- Smile And Economics of late paganism/Xtianism
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71234 From: rory12001 Date: 2009-10-21
Subject: Re: Sigh -- Smile And Economics of late paganism/Xtianism
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71235 From: A. Sempronius Regulus Date: 2009-10-21
Subject: Re: Ancient Roman Shade
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71236 From: gualterus_graecus Date: 2009-10-21
Subject: Re: Ancient Roman Shade
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71237 From: louisgates2001 Date: 2009-10-21
Subject: Selling 2 suits of Roman SCA armor
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71238 From: Patrick O Date: 2009-10-22
Subject: Report of the Senate - Fl. Galerius Aurelianus Tribunus Plebis
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71239 From: geranioj@aol.com Date: 2009-10-22
Subject: Hic est Marcus Nonius Balbo
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71240 From: geranioj@aol.com Date: 2009-10-22
Subject: Re: Latin Films
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71241 From: Cato Date: 2009-10-22
Subject: a.d. XI Kal. Nov.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71242 From: Cato Date: 2009-10-22
Subject: Re: Sigh -- Smile And Economics of late paganism/Xtianism
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71243 From: luciaiuliaaquila Date: 2009-10-22
Subject: Re: the Saturnalia thread
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71244 From: luciaiuliaaquila Date: 2009-10-22
Subject: Re: Ancient Roman Shade
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71245 From: D.O.A. Date: 2009-10-22
Subject: Re: Invitation to Temple Of Venus et Dedication!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71246 From: Cato Date: 2009-10-22
Subject: Re: Ancient Roman Shade
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71247 From: rory12001 Date: 2009-10-22
Subject: Re: Sigh -- Smile And Economics of late paganism/Xtianism
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71249 From: rory12001 Date: 2009-10-22
Subject: Re: Sigh -- Smile And Economics of late paganism/Xtianism



Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71071 From: luciaiuliaaquila Date: 2009-10-11
Subject: Re: Classic Poetry, Prose, Proems, Literature Excerpts
Salvete Omnes,

This night's offering is from Tacitus Liber I: 1-2:

Tacitus: The End of the Republic

(Tacitus begins the Annals by describing how the civil war and proscriptions (mass executions of political opponents) had destroyed the Republic.)

Rome at the beginning was ruled by kings. Freedom and the consulship were established by Lucius Brutus. Dictatorships were held for a temporary crisis. The power of the decemvirs did not last beyond two years, nor was the consular jurisdiction of the military tribunes of long duration. The despotisms of Cinna and Sulla were brief; the rule of Pompey and of Crassus soon yielded before Caesar; the arms of Lepidus and (Mark) Antony before Augustus; who, when the world was wearied by civil strife, subjected it to empire under the title of "Prince." But the successes and reverses of the old Roman people have been recorded by famous historians; and fine intellects were not wanting to describe the times of Augustus, till growing sycophancy scared them away. The histories of Tiberius, Caius (Caligula), Claudius, and Nero, while they were in power, were falsified through terror, and after their death were written under the irritation of a recent hatred. Hence my purpose is to relate a few facts about Augustus- more particularly his last acts, then the reign of Tiberius, and all which follows, without either bitterness or partiality, from any motives to which I am far removed.
When after the destruction of Brutus and Cassius there was no longer any army of the Republic, when Pompey was crushed in Sicily, and when, with Lepidus pushed aside and (Mark) Antony slain, even the Julian faction had only Caesar left to lead it, then, dropping the title of triumvir, and giving out that he was a Consul, and was satisfied with a tribune's authority for the protection of the people, Augustus won over the soldiers with gifts, the populace with cheap corn, and all men with the sweets of repose, and so grew greater by degrees, while he concentrated in himself the functions of the Senate, the magistrates, and the laws. He was wholly unopposed, for the boldest spirits had fallen in battle, or in the proscription, while the remaining nobles, the readier they were to be slaves, were raised the higher by wealth and promotion, so that, aggrandised by revolution, they preferred the safety of the present to the dangerous past. Nor did the provinces dislike that condition of affairs, for they distrusted the government of the Senate and the people, because of the rivalries between the leading men and the rapacity of the officials, while the protection of the laws was unavailing, as they were continually deranged by violence, intrigue, and finally by corruption.

1. Urbem Romam a principio reges habuere; libertatem et consulatum L. Brutus instituit. dictaturae ad tempus sumebantur; neque decemviralis potestas ultra biennium, neque tribunorum militum consulare ius diu valuit. non Cinnae, non Sullae longa dominatio; et Pompei Crassique potentia cito in Caesarem, Lepidi atque Antonii arma in Augustum cessere, qui cuncta discordiis civilibus fessa nomine principis sub imperium accepit. sed veteris populi Romani prospera vel adversa claris scriptoribus memorata sunt; temporibusque Augusti dicendis non defuere decora ingenia, donec gliscente adulatione deterrerentur. Tiberii Gaique et Claudii ac Neronis res florentibus ipsis ob metum falsae, postquam occiderant, recentibus odiis compositae sunt. inde consilium mihi pauca de Augusto et extrema tradere, mox Tiberii principatum et cetera, sine ira et studio, quorum causas procul habeo.

2. Postquam Bruto et Cassio caesis nulla iam publica arma, Pompeius apud Siciliam oppressus exutoque Lepido, interfecto Antonio ne Iulianis quidem partibus nisi Caesar dux reliquus, posito triumviri nomine consulem se ferens et ad tuendam plebem tribunicio iure contentum, ubi militem donis, populum annona, cunctos dulcedine otii pellexit, insurgere paulatim, munia senatus magistratuum legum in se trahere, nullo adversante, cum ferocissimi per acies aut proscriptione cecidissent, ceteri nobilium, quanto quis servitio promptior, opibus et honoribus extollerentur ac novis ex rebus aucti tuta et praesentia quam vetera et periculosa mallent. neque provinciae illum rerum statum abnuebant, suspecto senatus populique imperio ob certamina potentium et avaritiam magistratuum, invalido legum auxilio quae vi ambitu postremo pecunia turbabantur.

Valete optime,

Julia
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71072 From: Cato Date: 2009-10-12
Subject: Re: Latin phrase of the day.
Cato Iuliae Aquilae sal.

Salve!

Getting His house in place is proving to be more complex and time-consuming than I thought: it's one thing to have an idea or picture in your head and quite another to make all the bits of wood do what you want them to do :)

Perhaps Cicero was wrong to be so ironic; would you not think that he was wrong about his attitude towards the practices of augury? Note that I say the practices, not its usefulness for the society as a whole.

So rather than sweeping into a discussion of dueling philosophical schools, let's look into the way things have been developing in our own Respublica. By the way, I used "goals" in the place of "interests" not out of any specific purpose, but because I had considered them basically equivalent in this instance; I will use "interests" from here on for the purpose of speaking from the same understanding of the foundations of the discussion.

We are a respublica because we have common interests. The common interests bind us together individually to each other, sometimes encompassing the whole respublica, sometimes parts of it: I think it safe to say that we are all interested in Roman history and the sacra publica; some in government; some in cooking; some in clothing, etc. So there are disparate interests that form a kind of collage or tapestry, some parts touching others and some parts entirely separate. The thread that binds this tapestry together is our shared interest generally in things Roman.

We are a respublica because we have common law. The law is what binds us together as a cohesive whole communally; it makes the tapestry keep its shape. If we did not have a common law, we would simply be another internet group throwing out bit and pieces of knowledge, forever changing shape and form, adapting to the current fads or interests as they arose. The law reminds us that we are stronger communally than separately; it reminds us that there is a greater duty than simple self-interest and self-absorption.

When we became citizens of the respublica, we bound ourselves more formally into a deeper social contract with each other than simple common interests would require. This contract submits our individual will and interests to the general understanding that the respublica stands for something greater than our individual selves. The strength of this contract resides in the will of the People; so when we say "submit" it should not be taken to literally mean any kind of "slavery" in the sense of servitude or bondage, but rather a willingness to let the benefits for the whole respublica outweigh our own personal desires.

Some of us see the law as the bulwark of the strength of the People to exercise their will rather than be subject to the whims of tyrants or despots; when our own government, given its authority solely as a gift from the People, then turn and abuse the authority given them, the contrast between willing submission and forced subjection becomes blatant and its acceptance untenable. The consuls and praetors and censors - even the Senate - derive their power and authority not from birthright or external force, but from within the respublica, from the common law by which the People have seen fit to govern themselves. If they offend against that law, they are digging into the foundations of their own authority, and, worse, undermining the foundations of the common law and the social contract which holds the respublica together. They are putting their own interests first, above the interests and benefit of the respublica.

These comments about the Law Review List are odd and relatively disingenuous, Iulia. If you were asked a question on a subject to which you had given an enormous amount of time and thought, both private and public, would you not explain exactly what you thought and why - none of which, of course, was a surprise to anyone involved? That is precisely what I did in the Law Review List, a list in which energetic discussion and back-and-forth on many ideas were in full swing until at times hijacked by personal animosities and an apparent - I say apparent - relatively low level of interest on the part of the consul involved. In fact, if you look at the way items were presented on the laws List, it mirrored your own ideal set-up in many ways; Everyone could describe what they thought about any law, not just ones that others talked about, and pros and cons of all approaches were discussed. But if the person with the authority to act upon suggestions and comments seems disinterested, what point is there to continue?

If I am elected consul, you can be sure that my office will be in the Forum, open and available for any citizen to stop in and watch and listen, without fear that somehow transparent and open government is a cause for consternation. I will be scrupulous in my attention to he law, and those laws which I abhor and would see repealed will be given full scrutiny in the public eye. If the People feel that I make a case strong enough to repeal them, they will be repealed. If not, we will continue to obey them. But there is no reason why they should not be brought into account if they do not seem to serve the respublica well.

Vale,

Cato
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71073 From: Cato Date: 2009-10-12
Subject: Re: Classic Poetry, Prose, Proems, Literature Excerpts
Cato omnibus in foro SPD

Salvete!

"...for they distrusted the government of the Senate and the people, because of the rivalries between the leading men and the rapacity of the officials, while the protection of the laws was unavailing, as they were continually deranged by violence, intrigue, and finally by corruption."

Precisely.

Valete!

Cato
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71074 From: Cato Date: 2009-10-12
Subject: a.d. IV Id. Oct.
Cato omnibus in foro SPD

Salvete omnes!

Hodiernus dies est ante diem IV Idus Octobris; haec dies comitialis est.

"But these rejoicings were very nearly being embittered by a great
disaster in Samnium. The consul Cornelius had advanced from Saticula
and led his army by a mountain pass which descended into a narrow
valley. All the surrounding heights were occupied by the enemy, and he
did not notice them high up above him till retreat was impossible. The
Samnites were waiting quietly till the whole of the column should
descend into the lowest part of the valley, but meantime P. Decius, a
military tribune, descried a peak jutting out on the pass which
commanded the enemy's camp. This height would have been a difficult
one for a heavy-armed force to climb but not for one in light marching
order. Decius came up to the consul, who was in a great state of
alarm, and said to him: 'Do you see, A. Cornelius, that height above
the enemy? If we promptly seize that position which the Samnites were
blind enough to leave unoccupied, it will prove a stronghold in which
all our hopes of safety will center. Do not give me more than the
hastati and principes of one legion. When I have reached the summit
with them you may march on out of this and save yourself and the army,
for the enemy below, a mark for every missile we hurl, will not be
able to move without being destroyed. Either the Fortune of Rome or
our own courage will then clear the way for our escape.' The consul
warmly thanked him, and after being furnished with the detachment he
asked for, he marched through the pass unobserved and only came into
view of the enemy when he was close to the spot for which he was
making. Then whilst every eye was fixed upon him in silent
astonishment, he gave the consul time to withdraw his army into a more
favourable position until he had halted his own men on the summit. The
Samnites marched aimlessly hither and thither; they could not follow
the consul except by the same path where he had been exposed to their
weapons and which was now equally dangerous to them, nor could they
lead a force up the hill above them which Decius had seized.

He and his men had snatched victory from their grasp, and therefore it
was against him that their rage was mainly directed, whilst the
nearness of the position and the paucity of its defenders were
additional incentives to them to attack it. First they were bent upon
investing the peaks on all sides so as to cut Decius off from the
consul, then they thought of retiring and leaving the way open for him
so that they could attack when he had descended into the valley.
Whilst they were still in this state of indecision night overtook
them. At first Decius hoped to be able to attack them from his higher
ground while they were coming up the height; then he began to wonder
why they did not show fight, or, at all events, if they were deterred
by the nature of the ground why they did not enclose him with a
circumvallation. He called the centurions round him. 'What ignorance,
what cowardice this is!' he exclaimed. 'How on earth did those men win
a victory over the Sidicines and Campanians? You see them there
marching up and down, at one time forming up in close order, at
another extending. We could by this time have been completely invested
yet no one begins to entrench. We shall be like them if we stay here
longer than we need. Come along with me and let us reconnoitre their
positions while some light is still left and find out where the exit
from here is open.' Disguised in a common soldier's cloak that the
enemy might not mark the general going his rounds, and with his
centurions similarly attired, he made a thorough examination of all
these details." - Livy, History of Rome 7.34

Today is the second day of the Meditrinalia.


Today is also the celebration of Columbus Day in the United States. On 12 October, 1492, Columbus first saw the islands of the New World, landing in the Bahamas. Later in the month he would sail to Cuba and to Hispaniola (now Haiti). He thought he had reached the East Indies, the islands off Southeast Asia.

Contrary to popular belief, most educated individuals in the 15th
century, and especially sailors, already knew that the earth was
round. What was not realized by Columbus, however, was just how big a
globe it was - Columbus seriously underestimated the size of the
planet. He and his crew had expected to see people native to India, or be taken to see the great leader Khan. They called the first people they saw "Indians." From them they learned that the island was called Guanahani. Columbus christened it San Salvador and claimed it immediately for Spain. When they landed on the island that is now Cuba, they thought they were in Japan, and after three subsequent voyages, Columbus was still unenlightened. He died a famous man, but he never knew that he discovered lands that few people had imagined were there.

Valete!

Cato
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71075 From: Nero Date: 2009-10-12
Subject: Re: Roman Medicine
Salve,
As I thought the past few days I've been with my guy leaving no time for posts but thank you for posting yours:)
Very Interesting can't wait to read your paper.
Di Vos Incolumes Custodiant.
Nero

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "luciaiuliaaquila" <dis_pensible@...> wrote:
>
> Julia Caecae sal,
>
> Yes Lavender was used for many reasons, in addition to flavoring foods, medicines(antiseptic, healing), purification rituals, insect repellant, scenting the baths, perfumes, skin care. I have a paper on it on my other computer and it will be included in TOV workshop pt 1 in November. It was originally known as nardus, sometimes seen translated as spikenard but eventually it was known as Lavandarius, derived from the Latin lavare "to wash", which you may be familiar with by now;)
>
> I will be adding more here as time permits, so watch for it!
>
> Vale amica,
>
> Julia
>
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Shoshana Hathaway" <shoshanahathaway@> wrote:
> >
> > Caeca Juliae sal,
> >
> > Thank you for this very interesting post. I did know some of this, but
> > certainly not all, and not the great use made of honey and beeswax by the
> > Romans. I wonder ...was lavender available to the Ancient Romans? As I am
> > sure you know, lavender is an excellent help in healing burns, among other
> > things, at least in essential oil form.
> >
> > Vale optime,
> > C. Maria Caeca
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "luciaiuliaaquila" <dis_pensible@>
> > To: <Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com>
> > Sent: Friday, October 09, 2009 4:19 PM
> > Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Roman Medicine
> >
> >
> > Salvéte Omnes,
> >
> > Honey~ Focusing mainly on Wound Care and its adaptation to today's medicine.
> >
> > "Unwashed wool supplies very many remedies...it is applied..with honey to
> > old sores. Wounds it heals if dipped in wine or vinegar..yolks of eggs..are
> > taken for dysentery with the ash of their shells, poppy juice and wine. It
> > is recommended to bathe the eyes with a decoction of the liver and to apply
> > the marrow to those that are painful or swollen."
> > ~Pliny
> >
> > The many attributes of Honey were very well known in the Ancient World, for
> > its preservative value, its healing value, flavor and health properties.
> > Women used honey to soften the skin as facial masks, in lip balm to sweeten
> > one's kiss and a touch may have been added to perfumes or even to skin balms
> > for obvious reasons. A skin softener from beeswax was also used which was
> > made from boiling the beeswax in salt water. Pliny also describes using the
> > broth of white beeswax and salt water to feed to those with dysentery. Honey
> > was also used for food preservation in Ancient Rome and already was being
> > used in embalming in other ancient cultures, although Ancient Roman citizens
> > rarely buried their dead.
> > Honey suppresses infection in wounds because of its high sugar content
> > however due to its antibacterial components dressings do not have to be
> > changed as often allowing the patients body to heal itself through its own
> > defenses allowing autolytic debridement, re-epithelialization and the
> > subsequent healing. Our ancient ancestors knew this through observation and
> > success.
> > Modern microbiological studies have shown more than one hundred-fold
> > differences in the potency of the antibacterial activity of various types of
> > honey with best results expected when using a honey with a high level of
> > antibacterial activity. Something our ancient ancestors already knew. While
> > discussing differences in honeys, Aristotle (384-322 BC) referred to pale
> > honey as being "good as a salve for sore eyes and wounds." Dioscorides (c.50
> > AD) wrote that pale yellow honey from Attica was the best: "good for all
> > rotten and hollow ulcers".
> > Today some still use honey with good results however in clinical settings,
> > and at home, Hydrocolloids are often used to get similar effects without the
> > mess; these are made of cellulose, guar, pectin and gelatin.
> > The antibacterial activity of honey is due to hydrogen peroxide generated
> > primarily by the action of an enzyme that the bees add to the nectar
> > although there are some floral sources that provide additional antibacterial
> > components. Honey is effective against Eschericihia coli and Staphylococcus
> > aureus which are the most common causes of infected wounds. Our body tissues
> > and serum contain catalase, which is a human enzyme that breaks down
> > hydrogen. Catalase does not break down the antibacterial components that
> > come from the nectar. The bee enzyme that produces hydrogen peroxide in
> > honey needs oxygen to be available for the reaction, so care must be taken
> > to aerate wounds under wound dressings or in wound cavities. The same bee
> > enzyme that produces hydrogen peroxide in honey becomes active only when the
> > acidity of honey is neutralized by body fluids.
> > Manuka honey is recommended for modern use as it contains hydrogen peroxide
> > activity as well as the component that comes from the nectar. It is also
> > reportedly more stable in the presence of heat, light and can tolerate less
> > oxygen in the event a closed bandage is needed. Unpasteurized honey, as was
> > used in ancient Rome, should be used because the enzyme in honey that
> > produces hydrogen peroxide is destroyed by heating and exposure to light so
> > it should also be stored in a cool place and protected from light. Honey can
> > be slightly warmed to liquefy it at no more than 37°C. It is interesting to
> > note that in modern studies no case of infection resulting from the use of
> > honey has been reported.
> >
> > Wound Care using Honey:
> > 1. The amount of honey depends on the amount of fluid exuding from the
> > wound.
> > 2. The various beneficial effects of honey on wound tissues will be reduced
> > or lost if small amounts of honey become diluted by large amounts of fluid.
> > The frequency of dressing changes required will depend on how rapidly the
> > honey is being diluted by fluid.
> > 3. Daily dressing changes are usual however up to three times daily may be
> > needed. If the dressing sticks to the wound this indicates that more
> > frequent changes of dressing are needed. Exudation of fluid should be
> > reduced by the anti-inflammatory action of honey, so less frequent dressing
> > changes may be needed later - a few days between changes - this will give
> > the wound a chance to re-epithelialize and heal using the body's own system.
> > 4. More honey is required on deeper infections, to obtain an effective level
> > of antibacterial activity diffusing deep into the wound tissues. Typically,
> > 20 ml of honey (25 - 30 g, 1 ounce) is used on a 10 cm X 10 cm (4 inch X 4
> > inch) dressing.
> > 5. Occlusive (waterproof) or absorbent secondary dressings (Hydrocolloids)
> > are needed to prevent honey oozing out from the wound dressing. (Occlusive
> > dressings are better as they keep more of the honey in contact with the
> > wound - absorbent dressings soak the honey away from the wound
> > 6. Dressing pads impregnated with honey are the most convenient way of
> > applying honey to surface wounds: it is best to spread the honey on the
> > dressing rather than on the wound.
> > 7. Abscesses, cavities and depressions in the wound bed are filled with
> > honey before applying the honey dressing pad, so that the honey is in direct
> > contact with the wound bed.
> > 8. The honey dressings are cut to a size that extends beyond the edges of
> > the wound and any surrounding inflamed area.
> >
> > There are many more uses for honey, some I use, others, I wouldn't:
> >
> > Mercurialis (de Arte Gymnast. Amstel. 4to. 1672, pp2, 3):
> > "A blind soldier named Valerius Apes, having consulted the oracle, was
> > informed that he should mix the blood of a white cock with honey, to make up
> > an ointment to be applied to his eyes, for three consecutive days: he
> > received his sight, and returned public thanks to the gods."
> > "Julian appeared lost beyond all hope from a spitting of blood. The god
> > ordered him to take from the altar some seeds of the pine, and to mix them
> > with honey, of which mixture he was to eat for three days. He was saved, and
> > came to thank the gods in presence of the people."
> >
> > I would not put chicken blood on any open wound or body opening in today's
> > world. However if one has a sty I could see how a poultice of pure rose
> > water and honey would help. In antiquity honey had a great reputation in
> > producing clearer vision; this may also be one of the reasons for its
> > reputation of endowing the power of divination - so it improves not only the
> > physical but also the spiritual sight - a meta-magical construct.
> > Pine seeds with honey are nutritious and contain thiamine, vitamin B1,
> > pinoleic acid, magnesium, rich in iron (key component in hemoglobin that
> > oxygen carrying pigment that supplies energy and contains more protein than
> > any other seed/nut in addition to the highest concentration of Oleic
> > acid(the stuff that lowers triglycerides) and have anti-inflammatory and
> > antioxidant action. So Julian surely received some benefit and may have had
> > an iron deficiency anemia- spitting up blood can be a symptom of anemia.
> >
> > Most of us have heard of Honey and lemon, or Honey and Rum (or another
> > alcohol of choice) including Mulsum - all beneficial and all having origins
> > in ancient times. Oxymel, a mixture of honey, vinegar, salt, and water was
> > not just used in preparing vegetables was also a cure for throat and ear
> > problems. Hydromel (when fermented makes mead) and aqua mulsa, a
> > honey-water, were also used as medicine. A tonic of cinnamon and honey were
> > used to treat cold and sore throats, the antibacterial properties of
> > cinnamon are for another time ;)
> > . Hippocrates considered honey a very good expectorant and said of its
> > virtues: "It causes heat, cleans sores and ulcers, softens hard ulcers of
> > the lips, heals carbuncles and running sores." He recommended honey for
> > difficulty in breathing due to its expectorant qualities: "it causes
> > spitting." This has credence in modern treatment.
> > . Dioscorides in Materia Medica often mentions honey as an excellent
> > medicine in addition to beeswax, propolis and honey- wie. He also praises
> > the medicinal value of wax, propolis and honey-wine. This also has credence
> > in modern treatment.
> > . Cornelius Celsus in De Medicina stated that a physician must heal in a
> > safe, quick and pleasing manner "tuto, cito et jucunde", which could be best
> > accomplished with honey.
> > . Galen recommended the mixing of four parts of honey with one part of gall
> > of the sea-tortoise which, when dropped into the eyes, would improve the
> > sight. He also recommended a paste of honey and dead bees for hair growth:
> > "Take Bees dead in combs, and when they are through dry make them into
> > powder, mingle them with the honey in which they died and anoint the parts
> > of the Head that are bald and thin-haired, and you shall see them grow
> > again."
> > . Marcellus: "The honey pure and neat wherein the Bees are dead, let that
> > drop into the eyes; or honey mixed with the ashes of the heads of Bees,
> > makes the eyes very clear." Today in India they still make a kohl that even
> > children wear to protect and nourish their eyes, it is made of ash, beeswax,
> > a touch of camphor and in some cases a touch of honey (although this is
> > usually ceremonial). It is supposed to make the eyes healthy, clear the
> > whites and make the eyes shine.
> > . Pliny also credited honey in which bees have died with the faculty of
> > relieving dullness of sight and hearing. Pliny burned the bees, mixed their
> > ashes with honey and used the substance for all kinds of ailments: "Powdered
> > bees with milk, wine or honey will surely cure dropsy, dissolve gravel and
> > stones, will open all passages of urine and cure the stopping of the
> > bladder. Bees pounded with honey cure griping of the belly." Honey can be
> > soothing to some abdominal pain in small amounts; it can also be a laxative
> > in larger amounts. Clear fluids are better for stones and bladder problems
> > though.
> > . Celsus prescribed raw honey as a laxative and boiled honey as a cure for
> > diarrhea: "the acrimony is taken away by boyling which wont to move the
> > belly and to diminish the virtue of the food" (Libr. 3 C. 3). Again, it is
> > dependant on amounts and how the individual reacts to the honey.
> > . Claudius Aelianus (Aelian) believed that honey from Pontus cured epilepsy.
> > I would have to see what else is in that honey, and if perhaps the
> > "seizures" may have been due to a blood glucose imbalance;)
> > . Porphyry believed honey had four excellent qualities: 1) nourishing food
> > 2) a good cleanser 3) healing power 4) pleasant due to its sweetness. I
> > concur.
> > . Aristoxenus believed anyone who eats honey, spring onions and bread for
> > his daily breakfast will be free from all diseases for life.
> >
> > Well this is all I have for today!
> >
> > Cúrá ut valeás optimé!
> >
> > Julia
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------------
> >
> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> >
> >
> > No virus found in this incoming message.
> > Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> > Version: 8.5.421 / Virus Database: 270.14.8/2425 - Release Date: 10/09/09
> > 08:10:00
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71076 From: Timothy or Stephen Gallagher Date: 2009-10-12
Subject: The Latin Phrase of the Day
Salvete,
 
Magna res est vocis et silentii temperamentum - The great thing is to know when to speak and when to keep quiet
 
 
Valete
 
Ti. Galerius Paulinus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71077 From: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com Date: 2009-10-12
Subject: Posting rules in this Forum, 10/12/2009, 11:45 pm
Reminder from:   Nova-Roma Yahoo! Group
 
Title:   Posting rules in this Forum
 
Date:   Monday October 12, 2009
Time:   11:45 pm - 12:00 am
Repeats:   This event repeats every week until Friday January 1, 2010.
Location:   Rome
Notes:   Praetores omnibus s.d.

Please keep on mind the posting rules defined in the current Edictum de sermone Apr. 24, 2762 GEM-PMA, that you find in the Files section of this Forum, at:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma/files/Edicta%20de%20sermone/

Valete omnes,


Praetores G.E.Marinus and P.M.Albucius
 
Copyright © 2009  Yahoo! Inc. All Rights Reserved | Terms of Service | Privacy Policy
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71078 From: Cato Date: 2009-10-13
Subject: a.d. III Id. Oct.
Cato omnibus in foro SPD

Salvete omnes!

Hodiernus dies est ante diem III Idus Octobris; haec dies nefastus publicus est.

"After arranging the watches, he ordered the tessera to be given to
the rest of the troops; when the bugle sounded for the second watch
they were to muster round him in silence. When they had assembled in
accordance with instructions, he said: 'This silence, soldiers, must
be maintained, and all applause as you listen to me checked. When I
have laid my proposals fully before you, those of you who approve will
cross over silently to the right. The opinion of the majority will be
adopted. Now listen to my plans. You were not carried here in flight,
nor have you been abandoned through cowardice, and the enemy are
investing you. You seized this position by your courage, by your
courage you must get away from it. By coming here you have saved a
splendid army for Rome, now you must save yourselves by cutting your
way out. Though few in number you have brought aid to many, and it is
only fitting to your deserts that you yourselves should need the aid
of none. We have to do with an enemy who through his slackness
yesterday failed to use the chance which Fortune gave him of wiping
out an entire army; who did not perceive this most useful peak hanging
over his head until it had been seized by us. With all their thousands
of men they did not prevent us, few as we are, from climbing it, and
now that we are holding it, did they, though plenty of daylight
remained, enclose us with lines of circumvallation? The enemy whom you
eluded while his eyes were open, and he was on the watch, you
certainly ought to evade when he is heavy with sleep. In fact, it is
absolutely necessary for you to do so, for our position is such that I
have rather to point out the necessity in which you are placed than to
suggest any plan of action. For there can be no question as to your
remaining here or departing, since Fortune has left you nothing but
your arms and the courage which knows how to use them. If we show more
fear of the sword than becomes men and Romans we shall have to die of
hunger and thirst. Our one chance of safety, then, lies in our
breaking our way through and departing. We must do that either in the
daytime or at night. But this is a point which admits of little doubt;
if we wait for daylight how can we hope that the enemy, who, as you
see, has drawn a ring of men all round us, will not completely enclose
us with entrenchments? On the other hand, if night be best for our
sortie, as it most certainly is, then this hour of the night is most
assuredly the fittest. You have mustered at the call for the second
watch, an hour when men are buried in sleep. You will pass through
them in silence, unnoticed by the sleepers, but should they become
aware of your presence you will throw them into a panic by a sudden
shout. You have followed me so far, follow me still, while I follow
Fortune who has guided us here. Those of you who think this a safe
plan step forward and pass over to the right.' " - Livy, History of
Rome 7.35


"O Bandusian spring, clearer than glass, worthy of sweet wine and
flowers too, tomorrow you'll receive the gift of a kid goat, whose
head, swollen with horns newly grown, gives promise of love and
battles; in vain: for this offspring of a playful flock will stain
your ice-cold waters with his crimson blood. The harsh season of the
blazing Dog Star is powerless to affect you. You grant welcome
coolness to oxen weary of the plow and to the wandering herd. You too
will become one of the famous springs, when I sing of the oak tree
perched upon your hollow rocks, whence your babbling waters leap
forth." - Horace, Odes 3.13

"Fontanalia a Fonte, quod is dies feriae eius; ab eo tum et in fontes
coronas iaciunt et puteos coronant." - Varro, de Lingua Latina VI

Today is the celebration of the Fontinalia. The Fontinalia is a
festival in honor of Fontus, the god of fountains, springs, and wells.
Fontus was the presumed son of Janus by the nyph Juturna. From this
god's name and the Latin word font or fons we derive the names of
fountain, the baptismal font and the fonts, or typefaces, that we use
most days. The freshwater goddesses, the Camenae, oracular
water-nymphs, were honoured today as well. Today saw sacrifices,
feasts, games, and the drinking of wine mixed with spring water.
Garlands were used to decorate wells and springs today. Sacrificing,
feasting, games, and drinking plenty of wine mixed with spring water
would have been the theme of the day. On this day garlands of flowers
were spread in decoration, especially around wells and springs.


On this day, the Pauperes commilitones Christi Templique Solomonici (Poor Fellow-Soldiers of Christ and of the Temple of Solomon), also known as the Knights Templar, began their precipitous collapse.

The fall of the Templars may have started over the matters of a loan and a bruised ego. Philip IV, the King of France, needed cash for his wars and asked the Templars for money, who refused. The king applied for membership in the Templars, and was refused. The king tried to get the Pope to excommunicate the Templars for this, but Pope Boniface VIII refused. Philip sent his right-hand man, Guillaume de Nogaret, to "persuade" the pope, who later died from the wounds inflicted by de Nogaret. The next pope, Benedict XI, lifted the excommunication of Philip IV but refused to absolve de Nogaret (rumor has it that the pope died of poison soon after.) The next pope, Clement V, agreed to Philip's demands about the Templars, lifted the excommunications, and later moved the papacy to Avignon, at the time a "protectorate" of France. On 13 October AD 1307, Philip had the Knights Templar in France arrested and imprisoned.

Valete!

Cato
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71079 From: Maxima Valeria Messallina Date: 2009-10-13
Subject: Re: Maior and the BA
<<--- On Thu, 10/8/09, Kirsteen Wright <kirsteen.falconsfan@...> wrote:
 
As I've frequently said, I've never seen the Religio mocked on the BA - it's the one thing i wouldn't stand for because it's the whole reason I joined Nova Roma in the first place.>>
 
 
I guess hurling insults at the Virgo Maxima doesn't count. 
 

 


Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71080 From: Maxima Valeria Messallina Date: 2009-10-13
Subject: Re: Ethics
<<--- On Wed, 10/7/09, lathyrus77 <lathyrus77@...> wrote:
The BA can't seriously claim to be a bastion of free speech, when they have clearly demonstrated the only "free speech" is by those who aren't the enemies of the BA rats.
And they whine about ethics violation. This is the epitome of hypocrisy and irony. The rats are your senators, folks. These guys are part of the Powers That Be in Nova Roma. And because you have people like that in the Senate, your organization will stagnate, flounder, and dwindle.
The people of NR need to seriously overhaul this mess. Rid yourself of the rats!

/end rant
-Anna>>
 
Yes, let us rid ourselves of these rats before they sink Nova Roma and we all know that the rats are always the first to abandon ship.
 
Maxima Valeria Messallina

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71081 From: Cato Date: 2009-10-13
Subject: Re: Ethics
Cato Valeriae Messallinae Virgo Maximae omnibusque in foro SPD

Salvete!

This didn't make much sense, unfortunately. Rats are legendary for abandoning a ship *before* it sinks, not for *causing* it to sink. If you think that people talking on a List outside the "official" ones is capable of "sinking" Nova Roma - even if, unfortunately, some discussions there are offensive to many - you seriously overestimate the power of the pixel.

By the way, it may be of some interest for the People to know that the Senate is currently in session: the items on its agenda are the re-instatement of Marcus Audens' citizenship and seat in the Senate and a set of internal rules to give the consuls more control over who can speak on the Senate floor when the Senate is in session.

I don't know why none of the tribunes saw fit to announce the Senate session, but there you go.

Valete,

Cato

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Maxima Valeria Messallina <maximavaleriamessallina@...> wrote:

>  
> Yes, let us rid ourselves of these rats before they sink Nova Roma and we all know that the rats are always the first to abandon ship.
>  
> Maxima Valeria Messallina
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71082 From: David Kling Date: 2009-10-13
Subject: Re: Ethics
Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus Catoni salutem dicit

You are incorrect.  The first item on the senate agenda is to waive the 90 day wait to reinstate citizenship to Marcus Minucius Audens.  It has nothing to do with his inclusion into the list of senatores.  That is the call of the censores and not the senate.

Vale;

Modianus

On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 9:35 AM, Cato <catoinnyc@...> wrote:
 

Cato Valeriae Messallinae Virgo Maximae omnibusque in foro SPD

Salvete!

This didn't make much sense, unfortunately. Rats are legendary for abandoning a ship *before* it sinks, not for *causing* it to sink. If you think that people talking on a List outside the "official" ones is capable of "sinking" Nova Roma - even if, unfortunately, some discussions there are offensive to many - you seriously overestimate the power of the pixel.

By the way, it may be of some interest for the People to know that the Senate is currently in session: the items on its agenda are the re-instatement of Marcus Audens' citizenship and seat in the Senate and a set of internal rules to give the consuls more control over who can speak on the Senate floor when the Senate is in session.

I don't know why none of the tribunes saw fit to announce the Senate session, but there you go.

Valete,

Cato




Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71083 From: Kirsteen Wright Date: 2009-10-13
Subject: Re: Maior and the BA
On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 1:13 PM, Maxima Valeria Messallina <maximavaleriamessallina@...> wrote:
 
I guess hurling insults at the Virgo Maxima doesn't count. 

Well, first off, I'm not keen on hurling insults at anyone. But yes, it does happen and has happened on the Ba, both sides apparently having given as good as they've got.

However, I don't know whether this is a cultural difference or not. I'm in the UK (though there's not really much united about it:-), I'm Scottish and we have a long history of not mixing up the person with the position.  For instance, slag off the position of First Minister of the Scottish Assembly and you'd find a lot of us very annoyed at you. Slag off the current first minister or indeed any previous one and you'd find loads of us agreeing with you and probably even topping your stories. Even those of us who disagreed with you would accept that you were perfectly entitled to your personal opinion of the individual concerned.  We just have never felt that having a title, any title means the person themselves should be fireproof.

I guess what I'm trying to say is that, though I don't condone insulting anyone, insulting a person who happens to hold a position is not the same as insulting that position itself.

Flavia Lucilla Merula



 
 

 
 

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71084 From: Maxima Valeria Messallina Date: 2009-10-13
Subject: Re: Ethics
<<--- On Tue, 10/13/09, Cato <catoinnyc@...> wrote:
This didn't make much sense, unfortunately. Rats are legendary for abandoning a ship *before* it sinks, not for *causing* it to sink.>>
 
 
True enough, but then we were discussing the human kind of "rats".
 
Maxima Valeria Messallina
 
 

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71085 From: rory12001 Date: 2009-10-13
Subject: Re: Maior and the BA
Yes, that was extremely nasty, really inexcusable.
vale
Maior

-->
> <<--- On Thu, 10/8/09, Kirsteen Wright <kirsteen.falconsfan@...> wrote:
>  
> As I've frequently said, I've never seen the Religio mocked on the BA - it's the one thing i wouldn't stand for because it's the whole reason I joined Nova Roma in the first place.>>
>  
>  
> I guess hurling insults at the Virgo Maxima doesn't count. 
>  
>
>  
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71086 From: Maxima Valeria Messallina Date: 2009-10-13
Subject: Re: Maior and the BA
<<--- On Tue, 10/13/09, Kirsteen Wright <kirsteen.falconsfan@...> wrote:
Well, first off, I'm not keen on hurling insults at anyone. But yes, it does happen and has happened on the Ba, both sides apparently having given as good as they've got.

However, I don't know whether this is a cultural difference or not. I'm in the UK (though there's not really much united about it:-), I'm Scottish and we have a long history of not mixing up the person with the position.  For instance, slag off the position of First Minister of the Scottish Assembly and you'd find a lot of us very annoyed at you. Slag off the current first minister or indeed any previous one and you'd find loads of us agreeing with you and probably even topping your stories. Even those of us who disagreed with you would accept that you were perfectly entitled to your personal opinion of the individual concerned.  We just have never felt that having a title, any title means the person themselves should be fireproof.

I guess what I'm trying to say is that, though I don't condone insulting anyone, insulting a person who happens to hold a position is not the same as insulting that position itself.>>
 
Well said and very true.
However, insults were made about Vestals in general. I was very shocked at first, but I am not any longer. Just as I have gotten over the shock of finding out that there are certain people in Nova Roma who consider me, the Virgo Maxima, a "tramp" just because I dare to have an opinion on Nova Roma politics.
I also know that you, Lucilla Merula, are not among those persons and for that I am grateful.
 
Vale bene in pace Deorum,
 
Maxima Valeria Messallina
Sacerdos Vestalis

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71087 From: Cato Date: 2009-10-13
Subject: Re: Ethics
Cato omnibusque in foro SPD

Salvete!

Yes, that is correct, and I apologize for any confusion that may have arisen.

Valete,

Cato

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, David Kling <tau.athanasios@...> wrote:

...

It has nothing
> to do with his inclusion into the list of senatores. That is the call of
> the censores and not the senate.
>
> Vale;
>
> Modianus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71088 From: Cato Date: 2009-10-13
Subject: Re: Maior and the BA
Cato Maiori sal.

Salve.

As was your calling Venator a "hater" and a "coward" in the Senate.

Vale,

Cato



--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "rory12001" <rory12001@...> wrote:
>
> Yes, that was extremely nasty, really inexcusable.
> vale
> Maior
>
> -->
> > <<--- On Thu, 10/8/09, Kirsteen Wright <kirsteen.falconsfan@> wrote:
> >  
> > As I've frequently said, I've never seen the Religio mocked on the BA - it's the one thing i wouldn't stand for because it's the whole reason I joined Nova Roma in the first place.>>
> >  
> >  
> > I guess hurling insults at the Virgo Maxima doesn't count. 
> >  
> >
> >  
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71089 From: Cato Date: 2009-10-13
Subject: Re: Ethics
Cato Valeriae Messallinae sal.

Salve.

And you are correct, as I said at the time; political differences do not - or should nor - serve as a foundation for personal attacks, and your office is of great importance to the Respublica. I would be careful then, in deciding to call all those who subscribe to the Back Alley as "rats" - it sort of has the slightest, faintest whiff of hypocrisy about it. I do NOT say this to start an argument with you, only to note that if you feel aggrieved at being made fun of by those whose opinion differs from yours, the reverse may also be true.

Vale,

Cato

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Maxima Valeria Messallina <maximavaleriamessallina@...> wrote:
>
> <<--- On Tue, 10/13/09, Cato <catoinnyc@...> wrote:
> This didn't make much sense, unfortunately. Rats are legendary for abandoning a ship *before* it sinks, not for *causing* it to sink.>>
>  
>  
> True enough, but then we were discussing the human kind of "rats".
>  
> Maxima Valeria Messallina
>  
>  
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71090 From: rory12001 Date: 2009-10-13
Subject: Re: The BA [was Maior and the BA]
-Salvete;
I've retitled the thread. If you are in the BA, supposedly that's the culture -to insult each other. But Messallina wasn't there. And most there don't respect the religio.

Right now we had a debate in the Senate to close the lSenate ist between sessions,[there are constant posts & argument].

To many this is a good idea; it was done in Roma Antiqua. Also there should be no posting during certain calendar days, certain religious feria.

And despite the PM and myself telling those in the Senate house not to post during religious feria; they did it anyway. It was BA senators who did it and already Gn.Iulius Caesar won't vote to respect the state religio.

it has to do with respect for the gods
valete
Maior


> I guess what I'm trying to say is that, though I don't condone insulting anyone, insulting a person who happens to hold a position is not the same as insulting that position itself.>>
>  
> Well said and very true.
> However, insults were made about Vestals in general. I was very shocked at first, but I am not any longer. Just as I have gotten over the shock of finding out that there are certain people in Nova Roma who consider me, the Virgo Maxima, a "tramp" just because I dare to have an opinion on Nova Roma politics.
> I also know that you, Lucilla Merula, are not among those persons and for that I am grateful.
>  
> Vale bene in pace Deorum,
>  
> Maxima Valeria Messallina
> Sacerdos Vestalis
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71091 From: Maxima Valeria Messallina Date: 2009-10-13
Subject: Re: Ethics
<<--- On Tue, 10/13/09, Cato <catoinnyc@...> wrote:
And you are correct, as I said at the time; political differences do not - or should nor - serve as a foundation for personal attacks, and your office is of great importance to the Respublica. I would be careful then, in deciding to call all those who subscribe to the Back Alley as "rats" - it sort of has the slightest, faintest whiff of hypocrisy about it. I do NOT say this to start an argument with you, only to note that if you feel aggrieved at being made fun of by those whose opinion differs from yours, the reverse may also be true.>>
 
I was simply agreeing with Anna that Nova Roma could do with an overhaul and certain "rats" should be sent on their way, as they have shown no love for Nova Roma nor any true concern for her welfare. I certainly did not mean to imply that all those who subscribe to the BA are these people, for that is not true and I apologize if I have offended them.
However, please do no speak of me of hypocrisy, for I have learned that some people who are respectful to me on this and other lists, turn around and blast me behind my back. I have no intention of starting any arguments, least of all with you, Cato, as you have always addressed me with respect and consideration in your replies, and for that I am grateful.
But I do not consider being called an "idiot", a "tramp" and having insults of a sexual nature made at my expense, and that of the Vestals in general, as "being made fun of".
I have a sense of humor and I can take a joke, but what was said went way beyond that. It was dispectful to me and to my Office. Period. And worse -  it made my two apprentices decide not to join Nova Roma - ever. The damage has been done. 
 
Vale bene in pace Deorum,
 
Maxima Valeria Messallina
Sacerdos Vestalis

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71092 From: Gnaeus Iulius Caesar Date: 2009-10-13
Subject: Re: The BA [was Maior and the BA]
Salve Maior.
 
I simply don't accept the ludicrous suggestion an email list - which is all the Senate is - can equate to the various meeting places for the ancient Roman Senate. It has nothing to do with the Gods and everything to do with you trawling any excuse to shut down anyone's voice but youÂ’re your own and those that you approve of. More erroneous propaganda?
 
Vale
Caesar
 
 

From: rory12001
Sent: Tuesday, October 13, 2009 11:49 AM
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: The BA [was Maior and the BA]



-Salvete;
 I've retitled the thread. If you are in the BA, supposedly that's the culture -to insult each other. But Messallina wasn't there. And most there don't respect the religio.

Right now we had a debate in the Senate to close the lSenate ist between sessions,[there are constant posts & argument].

To many this is a good idea; it was done in Roma Antiqua. Also there should be no posting during certain calendar days, certain religious feria.

And despite the PM and myself telling those  in the Senate house not to post during religious feria; they did it anyway. It was BA senators who did it and already Gn.Iulius Caesar won't vote to respect the state religio.
               
             it has to do with respect for the gods
                          valete
                            Maior


> I guess what I'm trying to say is that, though I don't
condone insulting anyone, insulting a person who happens to hold a position is not the same as insulting that position itself.>>
>  
>
Well said and very true.
> However, insults were made about Vestals
in general. I was very shocked at first, but I am not any longer. Just as I have gotten over the shock of finding out that there are certain people in Nova Roma who consider me, the Virgo Maxima, a "tramp" just because I dare to have an opinion on Nova Roma politics.
> I also know that you, Lucilla
Merula, are not among those persons and for that I am grateful.
>
 
> Vale bene in pace Deorum,
>  
> Maxima Valeria
Messallina
> Sacerdos
Vestalis
>




------------------------------------

Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo..com/group/Nova-Roma/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    mailto:Nova-Roma-digest@yahoogroups.com
    mailto:Nova-Roma-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    Nova-Roma-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71093 From: Cato Date: 2009-10-13
Subject: Re: Ethics
Cato Valeriae Messalinae sal.

Salve.

I agree.

Vale,

Cato



--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Maxima Valeria Messallina <maximavaleriamessallina@...> wrote:
>
> <<--- On Tue, 10/13/09, Cato <catoinnyc@...> wrote:
> And you are correct, as I said at the time; political differences do not - or should nor - serve as a foundation for personal attacks, and your office is of great importance to the Respublica. I would be careful then, in deciding to call all those who subscribe to the Back Alley as "rats" - it sort of has the slightest, faintest whiff of hypocrisy about it. I do NOT say this to start an argument with you, only to note that if you feel aggrieved at being made fun of by those whose opinion differs from yours, the reverse may also be true.>>
>  
> I was simply agreeing with Anna that Nova Roma could do with an overhaul and certain "rats" should be sent on their way, as they have shown no love for Nova Roma nor any true concern for her welfare. I certainly did not mean to imply that all those who subscribe to the BA are these people, for that is not true and I apologize if I have offended them.
> However, please do no speak of me of hypocrisy, for I have learned that some people who are respectful to me on this and other lists, turn around and blast me behind my back. I have no intention of starting any arguments, least of all with you, Cato, as you have always addressed me with respect and consideration in your replies, and for that I am grateful.
> But I do not consider being called an "idiot", a "tramp" and having insults of a sexual nature made at my expense, and that of the Vestals in general, as "being made fun of".
> I have a sense of humor and I can take a joke, but what was said went way beyond that. It was dispectful to me and to my Office. Period. And worse -  it made my two apprentices decide not to join Nova Roma - ever. The damage has been done. 
>  
> Vale bene in pace Deorum,
>  
> Maxima Valeria Messallina
> Sacerdos Vestalis
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71094 From: David Kling Date: 2009-10-13
Subject: Re: Maior and the BA
Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus Catoni salutem dicit

That was the senate, and this is not the senate.  What is discussed on the senate list should remain on the senate list.

Vale;

Modianus

On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 1:26 PM, Cato <catoinnyc@...> wrote:
 

Cato Maiori sal.

Salve.

As was your calling Venator a "hater" and a "coward" in the Senate.

Vale,

Cato


Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71095 From: Cato Date: 2009-10-13
Subject: Re: Maior and the BA
Cato Modiano sal.

Salve.

That was the Back Alley, and this is not the Back Alley.

Vale,

Cato

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, David Kling <tau.athanasios@...> wrote:
>
> Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus Catoni salutem dicit
>
> That was the senate, and this is not the senate. What is discussed on the
> senate list should remain on the senate list.
>
> Vale;
>
> Modianus
>
> On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 1:26 PM, Cato <catoinnyc@...> wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > Cato Maiori sal.
> >
> > Salve.
> >
> > As was your calling Venator a "hater" and a "coward" in the Senate.
> >
> > Vale,
> >
> > Cato
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71098 From: David Kling Date: 2009-10-13
Subject: Re: Maior and the BA
Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus Catoni salutem dicit

The tribunes report the workings of the senate, or they are supposed to.  If they fail to do so then the responsibility does not fall upon you or any individual senator.  Additionally, the words in which you reference where disparaging attacks from one senator to another and hardly cover material pertinent to main list discussions.

I will repeat myself... what is posted in the senate is for the senate and not for the main list.

Vale;

Modianus

On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 3:36 PM, Cato <catoinnyc@...> wrote:
 

Cato Modiano sal.

Salve.

So are you now opposed to letting the People know that the Senate is in session?

Does not the announcement - which the tribunes neglected, somehow - always contain the agenda? Why, yes it does.

Has not the Senate reject, repeatedly, the formalizing of any kind of "seal" on the Senate? Why, yes it has.

Is it not in the best interests of the Respublica that the People know what the hell is going on? Why, yes it is.



Vale,

Cato

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71099 From: Publius Ullerius Stephanus Venator Date: 2009-10-13
Subject: Re: Maior and the BA
Salvete Modianus, Cato et alia...

On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 2:02 PM, David Kling wrote:
>
> Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus Catoni salutem dicit
>
> That was the senate, and this is not the senate.  What is discussed on the senate list should remain on the senate list.
>
> Vale;
>
> Modianus
>

I should like to agree with this.

Besides, I am loathe to take offense at a gathering of photons on my
LCD, especially when the issuer of the vituperation is of little to no
consequence in my life.

Valete - Venator
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71100 From: luciaiuliaaquila Date: 2009-10-13
Subject: Re: Maior and the BA
L. Iulia Aquila Fl. Lucillae Merulae S.P.D.

Just an observation, but it appears you post only in defense of the Back Alley and, for good measure, stir the pot a bit. Because of this I can only surmise this is your arena of interest – whether this is true or not. You also continually repeat a statement along the lines that you are "not keen on hurling insults at anyone" yet your communication skills are such that you actually do so, although to your perception you aren't?
Vis, quantum facias malí, vidére?

For example you stated in message #70990:
"Now you come on here actually rejoicing that the issue is abandoned and, despite your previous assurances, you are pleased that the Senate will not (I assume that is a typo) be bothered.
You assured us you were so seriously concerned with the public morality you wanted the Senate convened to investigate it and now you rejoice and are pleased that this is not happening!
How can we ever trust you again!"

Are you being witty? Or just being a paganstorme? I think the third syllable of nick name is quite appropriate, i.e. the storm (with an e) part – after all storms start with a stir, as in stirring the pot. From where I sit the quote from message #70990 is an insult – in any country. I have found that people who continually repeat what it is they do not so– usually do it – if they didn't they would not have to repeat it so often that they don't.
One thing that is being conveniently forgotten here is that the Honorable Iulius Severus Cos asked for impartial volunteers so our Consul Severus could lead such an inquiry into the matter – however he did not get one, not one, volunteer to sit on the inquiry.
Of course it makes arguments more interesting to leave that most important fact out.

You also stated:" insulting a person who happens to hold a position is not the same as insulting that position itself"

I do not think you are that naïve. An insult to the Pope of the RC Church is generally an insult to the very things he stands for. That's just an example and I could site many more. This is just common sense – reason - and though *you* may not see this, it is how it is; how human perception works both psychologically and sociologically. I do not, for one moment, think you are as blameless and beyond reproach as you verbalize because your actions are in contradiction – no matter how subtle they may be at times, even if you don't outright insult in a forthright manner. A politician is criticized because of his policy, his politics – the government that exists under his tutelage. It is by no means a stretch to apply this to the Religio and those who hold positions in the Religio – and also to the positions held within both the Religio and the Res Publica.

An insult to our Virgo Maxima, Our Vestals, is an insult to our Religio. Period.
I repeat what our Virgo Maxima said: that you were not among the persons insulting her so this is not about that in particular.
In my mind though I think more of a person who owns their own words regardless of what they say rather than detaches themselves from them.

*smile* Now before you think I am going to get into some sort of melee with you regarding this, think again. I have said all I deem necessary to you and I am far too busy. Also please do not think that I have entered some kind of – well – storm – over this, truly, quite the opposite – I approached this, this which should have been said quite a while ago, with a stoic conviviality.

Vale bene in pace Veneris,

L. Iulia Aquila


--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Kirsteen Wright <kirsteen.falconsfan@...> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 1:13 PM, Maxima Valeria Messallina <
> maximavaleriamessallina@...> wrote:
>
> >
> > I guess hurling insults at the Virgo Maxima doesn't count.
> >
>
> Well, first off, I'm not keen on hurling insults at anyone. But yes, it does
> happen and has happened on the Ba, both sides apparently having given as
> good as they've got.
>
> However, I don't know whether this is a cultural difference or not. I'm in
> the UK (though there's not really much united about it:-), I'm Scottish and
> we have a long history of not mixing up the person with the position. For
> instance, slag off the position of First Minister of the Scottish Assembly
> and you'd find a lot of us very annoyed at you. Slag off the current first
> minister or indeed any previous one and you'd find loads of us agreeing with
> you and probably even topping your stories. Even those of us who disagreed
> with you would accept that you were perfectly entitled to your personal
> opinion of the individual concerned. We just have never felt that having a
> title, any title means the person themselves should be fireproof.
>
> I guess what I'm trying to say is that, though I don't condone insulting
> anyone, insulting a person who happens to hold a position is not the same as
> insulting that position itself.
>
> Flavia Lucilla Merula
>
>
>
>
>
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71101 From: luciaiuliaaquila Date: 2009-10-13
Subject: Re: Books are ( fill in the blank)
Salvéte omnes,

This is in response to Censor Paulinus' very nice offering of "Books are."
It did not get much play because it just was not controversial enough – and Romans' love controversy. Or do they?
I believe a few Novi Romani think this is true. I still believe some of this is due to the RPG influence, however - well here is my submission based purely on personal observation and opinion, with a little jest but with truth as I see it:

Books are made from trees
With many branches,
That leads to knowledge,
That leads to wisdom.
That leads to entertainment.
They touch our lives.
Books are reflections of life,
Books are examples of life,
Books are not life.
Without life books would not exist.

Some emulate prominent figures in history
Whether historical or fiction.
Still some act as historical characters
Culled from such fiction.
So, when the stories are read –
Readers' may, to some degree or other,
Give an invented animus to the characters
Forged by their own innate imagination
To enjoy a unique, personal experience,
As books leave much to the imagination.

When acting transfers to real life
This acting lacks Real Animus,
It then becomes pale reflections
Of that which it seeks to emulate;
So suffers the actor's credibility
As does the relevance to the current age.
And so Books are enlightening too,
For lately I have enjoyed two books,
Roman Republic Historical fiction.
Now I am illuminated by knowledge
They've been enjoyed by those I know

For now I recognize fictional characters
In a few of those modern "Romans"
Who play - act yet lack the animus verus
Of those Ancients they play at.

Valéte optimé,

Julia



--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "ugo21121970" <ugo.coppola@...> wrote:
>
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Timothy or Stephen Gallagher
> <spqr753@> wrote:
> >
> > Ok putting aside politics for the moment lets have some fun! You must
> fill in with an appropriate quote OR something of your own.
> >
> >
> >
> > It must start... Books are....
>
> This is a slogan for a campaign about book reading by the Italian
> Ministry of Culture, but I find it quite poetical, so I'm quoting it
> here:
>
> "Books are doors which open into worlds of boundless imagination -
> whenever you want them to."
>
> Bene vale, et valete,
> P. Annæus Constantinus Placidus
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71102 From: luciaiuliaaquila Date: 2009-10-13
Subject: Re: Classic Poetry, Prose, Proems, Literature Excerpts
Iulia Equitio Catoni omnibusque in foro S.P.D.


Alas Senator Cato, it is that time of the year for us again – to engage in the topic of politics. It makes me sigh a bit because it puts me in mind of close personal friends with whom I never discuss politics because, despite our enjoyment of each others company, our politics are vastly different and at times at odds. Unfortunately you and I do not have that luxury to put it aside at this time of the year, and truly it is not so much our goals for the Res Publica that are so different but the way we both go about it, our perceptions and our methods.
I, once again, am not surprised that you zeroed in on the quote I posted on Tacitus, esp. that segment;) to which you replied:

>Precisely.

Precisely SENATOR Cato?
You as a Senator, a member of the Senate, should be more careful of such precision. I ask you to consider this: when you point your finger, Senator, so precisely - precisely three fingers point back at you.

Cúráte ut valéatis atque di vos incolumes custodiant.

Julia
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71103 From: luciaiuliaaquila Date: 2009-10-13
Subject: Re: Latin phrase of the day.
Iulia Equitio Catoni sal

Cato: > Getting His house in place is proving to be more complex and time-consuming than I thought: it's one thing to have an idea or picture in your head and quite another to make all the bits of wood do what you want them to do :)

Understood – it's never as easy as it looks but please post a photo when it is done, it would be a pleasure to see it. I have created a great Lararium plaque with raised clay figures that cracked during firing in such a way that it looks as if it was found in Pompeii but I am going to have to have to mount it on a wood foundation similar to a small temple because I have separate steps, columns and pediment of clay and the plaque was originally going to be its support. I understand when plans go awry:)

Cato:> Perhaps Cicero was wrong to be so ironic; would you not think that he was wrong about his attitude towards the practices of augury? Note that I say the practices, not its usefulness for the society as a whole.

No, I do not think Cato was wrong to be ironic, others opinions keep others on their toes, it motivates change and cooperation. From experience I have seen differences in practices of Augury – in each interpretation there is an element of intuition – and this cannot be taught. But the issue is not augury or if he was right or wrong – it was that he be interpreted according to what he actually meant – which he clearly conveyed and which was often misinterpreted due to lack of knowledge of Cicero in addition to not knowing the context in which the quote was offered.

> So rather than sweeping into a discussion of dueling philosophical schools, let's look into the way things have been developing in our own Respublica.

I fully understand this was your motivation for jumping into the topic, which is the true demonstration of disingenuousness here, but since the topic was the quote, my main objective was demonstrating that the quote is often misinterpreted due to lack of knowledge of Cicero in addition to not knowing the context in which the quote was offered. As for dueling philosophical schools I doubt you want to go there with me even if I had the time or thought it was relevant, in addition Cicero is a product of, as you put it, "dueling philosophical schools." Let's revisit this at another time in privatum when the tone is not so politcally charged - I would truly enjoy it.

Cato >By the way, I used "goals" in the place of "interests" not out of any specific purpose, but because I had considered them basically equivalent in this instance; I will use "interests" from here on for the purpose of speaking from the same understanding of the foundations of the discussion.

In public discourse it is extremely important that you use the correct verbiage. The word goal and the word interests are not interchangeable. One can create goals based on their interests; one's interests can influence goals. Also in public discourse rather than replying in a way to deflect that you were been wrong in your interpretation and also in your word choices by attempting to cover such errors a politician would gain greater respect with an honest admission of such errors.
You are the one running for Consul; you are the one who needs to demonstrate your worthiness to be Consul – and not by pointing out any possible errors by past magistrates. To do otherwise may be detrimental to the representation of your own character.

Cato > When we became citizens of the respublica, we bound ourselves more formally into a deeper social contract with each other than simple common interests would require. This contract submits our individual will and interests to the general understanding that the respublica stands for something greater than our individual selves. The strength of this contract resides in the will of the People; so when we say "submit" it should not be taken to literally mean any kind of "slavery" in the sense of servitude or bondage, but rather a willingness to let the benefits for the whole respublica outweigh our own personal desires.

Well. This is not what you originally said; you said:

Cato:"We also need common law. Common law means that we *agree* to
be subject to it, because that subjection - submission - "slavery" if we must -
makes the community a respublica."

So in your haste to make another political statement, campaign speech, it appears your statements were not well thought out leading them to appear contradictory. To me that raises many questions about a candidate's suitability and his/her motivations. I also feel that perhaps you are being a bit presumptive as to how "deeply" citizens really want to enter that contract. So here again, that statement appears a bit presumptive as well and it again raises questions whether the candidate truly has his/her finger on the pulse of citizenry at large which may lead voters to "deeply" consider not casting their vote for such a candidate. I prefer a candidate who not only says what he/she means but also means what he/she says.

Cato> Some of us see the law as the bulwark of the strength of the People to exercise their will rather than be subject to the whims of tyrants or despots; when our own government, given its authority solely as a gift from the People, then turn and abuse the authority given them, the contrast between willing submission and forced subjection becomes blatant and its acceptance untenable.

"Willing submission" another can of worms; people can be coerced to "willingly" submit. You need to pay attention to your verbiage, perhaps submit, submission are not the words you want to use. I would be very wary of a candidate who uses such a choice of words, lest you appear as tyrant or despot.
I repeat, you said:

Cato:"We also need common law. Common law means that we *agree* to
be subject to it, because that subjection - submission - "slavery" if we must -
makes the community a respublica."

To me that looks a bit tyrannical.

Cato> These comments about the Law Review List are odd and relatively disingenuous, Iulia. If you were asked a question on a subject to which you had given an enormous amount of time and thought, both private and public, would you not explain exactly what you thought and why - none of which, of course, was a surprise to anyone involved? That is precisely what I did in the Law Review List, a list in which energetic discussion and back-and-forth on many ideas were in full swing until at times hijacked by personal animosities and an apparent - I say apparent - relatively low level of interest on the part of the consul involved. In fact, if you look at the way items were presented on the laws List, it mirrored your own ideal set-up in many ways; Everyone could describe what they thought about any law, not just ones that others talked about, and pros and cons of all approaches were discussed. But if the person with the authority to act upon suggestions and comments seems disinterested, what point is there to continue?

In addition you say it is odd that I bring it up? Isn't this what your campaign revolves around, Leges? Don't you want to revise and change the laws to according to what you think is right? To you there may have appeared to be low interest because perhaps you could not see beyond what you considered your own blinding light, perhaps you cannot hear beyond your own blaring words. I was and still am, on the Law Review:) and I have never, in my entire professional career seen such an undisciplined, disorganized fiasco.
So~
I am being honest and forthright in my opinion so therefore I could not be disingenuous.
I am being disingenuous because I gave my opinion about the Law Review? i.e:
"In my opinion what has hindered law revision in this past year have been individuals and groups outside of the current government who appear to display a high level of egoism and a fervid desire to obtain an even higher level of authority and power by overpowering the law review committee rather than spending a little time planning and organizing. Rather than making a concerted effort to work together. Rather than prioritizing the problematic leges then taking one lex at a time and analyzing it, the committee was bombarded with a few individual's favorite set of leges they believe should be changed and the resulting dissertations all thrown on the table at once. That is a basic formula for a strategic tactic used to confuse, confound and intimidate participants and obstruct all progress. Of course I would not want to think those individuals, one being yourself, realized that this was what they/you were doing. I hope not
anyway."
Perhaps you do not understand what the word disingenuous is.
I offered a solution that would be a welcome start in many corporate meetings, esp. with a body who so obviously were at odds, yet for offering what could be a very valid part of a successful plan to get the Law Review going I am referred to as "disingenuous."
I also would seriously not vote for a candidate who rather than consider a citizen's sound and valid suggestion disregards it then attempts to malign the citizen by referring to him or her as "disingenuous." Talk about Despots and Tyrants :)
Disingenuous is a word I have seen used way too often against another usually when someone has been proven wrong.
So, again, I am being disingenuous because:
A) I proved a misunderstanding of a quote based on scholarly sources and hegemonic concensus of such scholarly sources.
B) I proved another quote taken out of context with an erroneous interpretation adapted to the first misunderstood quote which was meant to suit another's own motives irregardless of being right or wrong.
C) I offered a sensible analytical, impersonal solution to Law Review designed to curtail the bloviating grandstanding overwhelming the other committee members.

Instead of an offer to work with one of the Consular candidates on the still existing Law Review committee, in which perhaps we could actually salvage the LR in the remaining months in the interest of the Res Publica, what I got in return was what I believe is the original aim of engaging this conversation:
*A Campaign Speech*
Now that is being disingenuous Cato.
You might should get you a good campaign manager my friend :)

Cúrá ut valéas

Julia
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71104 From: luciaiuliaaquila Date: 2009-10-13
Subject: Ancient Roman Shade

http://www.sott.net/articles/show/176522-Romania-Hotel-to-hire-medium-to-deal-with-resident-ghost 

Photo: http://www.flickr.com/photos/l_j_a/4010062926/

A hotel in Romania recently became a site of interest for ghost hunters after a local photographed what appears to be a female spirit standing above its lobby stairwell. The hotel, named the Decebal, is situated in the mountain spa resort of Baile Herculane.

Local, Victorian Loval aged 33 and her boyfriend snuck inside the hotel which has been closed for five years for renovations. While inside she snapped the photo, but only saw the ghost later, when she developed the film. The hotel is said to stand on an ancient Roman ruin and the ghost appears to be wearing the white robe of an ancient Roman priestess.

Some have dismissed the photo as an illusion caused by irregular stonework in the lobby however others have been in the hotel since the event and swear that they saw the ghost. One group of students fled the building in fear after being confronted by the apparent spirit. Another man called a friend from inside the lobby in a panic after claiming to have seen its ghostly resident. Some have commented that she might be guarding something of ancient importance.

Now it appears that the owner of the site is worried that this non-paying resident might be bad for business when the establishment re-opens. It is being reported in the Romanian press that the hotel management is planning to bring out a medium to make contact and ask the spirit why she remains and on what conditions she might 'check-out'.

 

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71105 From: luciaiuliaaquila Date: 2009-10-13
Subject: Re: Classic Poetry, Prose, Proems, Literature Excerpts
Salvete Omnes,

I am preparing for a Halloween Bash in Nashville this weekend and part of that planning is to tell ghost stories. So I would like to share one of the Roman genre, most of you have probably heard this one before but a good story bears repeating:



An Ancient Ghost Story by Pliny the Younger

Erat Athenis spatiosa et magna domus, sed infamis et pestilens. Per silentium noctis sonus ferri et strepitus vinculorum procul, tum e proximo auditi sunt. Mox apparebat senex macie et squalore confectus, qui barbam magnam et capillos villosos habebat; pedibus et manibus catenas habebat.

Inhabitantes domus(gen) noctes diras et non somnum habebant. Morbus et etiam mors ex timore veniebant. Deserta et damna casa in silentio remanebat. Titulum positum est, sed nemo casam desideravit. Venit Athenas philosophus Athenodorus. Legit titulum, et pretio audito, multa rogat. Omnia audit, sed tamen casam capit.

In vespera, Athenodorus lumen, stilum, et pugillares in prima parte casae posuit; tum omnes servos dimittit. Animum, oculos, et manum cum pugillaribus occupat, quod vacua mens multos timores fingit.

Primo silentium est. Tum vincula procul audiuntur. Philosophus oculos non movet; stilo scribit. Soni in casa, tum in camera sunt. Athenodorus spectat; figuram videt. Senex stat et digito vocat. Athenodorus stilum iterum capit. Vincula audiuntur super caput. Nunc philosophus lumen capit. Senex tarde ad ianuam ambulat, et Athenodorus etiam ambulat post senem. In area casae senex philosophum deserit. Desertus philosophus in loco herbas ponit.

Postero die magistratum vocat et magistratus locum effodit. Ossa inserta in vinculis invenit, et, collecta, publice sepeliuntur. Numquam iterum senex videbatur.

There was in Athens a house, spacious and open, but with an infamous reputation, as if filled with pestilence. For in the dead of night, a noise like the clashing of iron could be heard. And if one listened carefully, it sounded like the rattling of chains. At first the noise seemed to be at a distance, but then it would approach, nearer, nearer, nearer. Suddenly a phantom would appear, an old man, pale and emaciated, with a long beard, and hair that appeared driven by the wind. The fetters on his feet and hands rattled as he moved them.
Any dwellers in the house passed sleepless nights under the most dismal terrors imaginable. The nights without rest led them to a kind of madness, and as the horrors in their minds increased, onto a path toward death. Even in the daytime--when the phantom did not appear--the memory of the nightmare was so strong that it still passed before their eyes. The terror remained when the cause of it was gone.
Damned as uninhabitable, the house was at last deserted, left to the spectral monster. But in hope that some tenant might be found who was unaware of the malevolence within it, the house was posted for rent or sale.
It happened that a philosopher named Athenodorus came to Athens at that time. Reading the posted bill, he discovered the dwelling's price. The extraordinary cheapness raised his suspicion, yet when he heard the whole story, he was not in the least put off. Indeed, he was eager to take the place. And did so immediately.
As evening drew near, Athenodorus had a couch prepared for him in the front section of the house. He asked for a light and his writing materials, then dismissed his retainers. To keep his mind from being distracted by vain terrors of imaginary noises and apparitions, he directed all his energy toward his writing.
For a time the night was silent. Then came the rattling of fetters. Athenodorus neither lifted up his eyes, nor laid down his pen. Instead he closed his ears by concentrating on his work. But the noise increased and advanced closer till it seemed to be at the door, and at last in the very chamber. Athenodorus looked round and saw the apparition exactly as it had been described to him. It stood before him, beckoning with one finger.
Athenodorus made a sign with his hand that the visitor should wait a little, and bent over his work. The ghost, however, shook the chains over the philosopher's head, beckoning as before. Athenodorus now took up his lamp and followed. The ghost moved slowly, as if held back by his chains. Once it reached the courtyard, it suddenly vanished.
Athenodorus, now deserted, carefully marked the spot with a handful of grass and leaves. The next day he asked the magistrate to have the spot dug up. There they found--intertwined with chains--the bones that were all that remained of a body that had long lain in the ground. Carefully, the skeletal relics were collected and given proper burial, at public expense. The tortured ancient was at rest. And the house in Athens was haunted no more.

Valete optime,

Julia
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71106 From: luciaiuliaaquila Date: 2009-10-13
Subject: Re: Roman Medicine
Salvete Omnes,

Salus populi suprema lex - by Cicero.
The well being of the people (of Rome) is the supreme law.

I would like to present some herbal remedies for skin rashes, eruptions and acne used in Ancient Rome per a cives request. This will be part of a presentation given in November 2009, however it is not comprehensive as I do not have time to go into each herb, cite modern studies etc, so I have offered a sampling of herbs with a few applications from my notes. All of these herbs have other uses, some a myriad. Of course I begin with words from De Medicina by Celsus:

5 To treat pimples and spots and freckles is almost a waste of time, yet women cannot be torn away from caring from their looks. But of these just mentioned, pimples and spots are commonly known, although that species of spot is more rare which is called by the Greeks semion( birth mark, naevus) since it is rather red and irregular. Freckles are, in fact, ignored by most; they are nothing more than a roughened and indurated discoloration. Whilst the others occur only on the face, a spot sometimes also appears on other parts of the body; of that by itself I do not think it worth while to write elsewhere. But pimples are best removed by the application of resin to which not less than the same amount of split alum and a little honey has been added. A spot is removed by equal quantities of galbanum and soda pounded in vinegar to the consistency of honey. With this the part is to be smeared, and after the lapse of several hours, the next morning, it is washed off, and the place anointed lightly with oil. Freckles are removed by resin to which a third part of rock-salt and a little honey has been added. For all the above and also for colouring scars that composition is useful which is said to have been invented by Trypho the father. In this are equal parts of the dregs of bennut oil, bluish Cimolian chalk, bitter almonds, barley and vetch meal, along with white soapwort and mellilot seeds. These are all rubbed up together with very bitter honey, smeared on at night and washed away in the morning.
Celsus: De Medicina Liber VI

Calendula (calendula officinalis aka Marigold) - from the Roman word "calendae" meaning the first day of the month. The name is said to refer to the fact that the plant flowers throughout several months. Excellent for skin rashes. It was widely used as a cheap substitute for saffron which in those times was extremely expensive. In today's world saffron is extremely expensive but Marigolds are plentiful. Everyone should have some calendula on hand, it is cheap and easy to make. Those who may be sensitive to live Marigolds most likely will not have the sensitivity to the dried ones. This is because of the unique property of Marigolds to be a natural insecticide protecting one's garden from insect invasion, however once dried that component is greatly diminished and what remains is the ingredient recommended for even newborns. I can't tell you how many times I have heard people say they avoid anything with Marigolds because they are allergic to them, but , "yes, I use calendula."

Chamomile: This is simple, esp. a fix for a small cropping of blemishes – fix a cup of chamomile tea, do not discard the warm teabag but apply it as a poultice to the blemish. In the "Pharmcodynamic Basis of Herbal Medicine" by M.S. Ebadi he states: "Chamomile has been used medicinally since Ancient Rome for its purportive sedative, antispasmodic and antirheumatic effects." Its medicinal usage dates back to antiquity: Hippocrates, Galen, and Asclepius made reference to it.
Roman chamomile, Chamaemelum nobile, comes from the leaves and German chamomile, Matricaria chamomilla, comes from the flowers, is used to treat slow-healing wounds, psoriasis, eczema, diaper rash, chickenpox, and burns from cancer radiation therapy. Both annual herbs belong to the Asteraceae/Compositae family and are similar in physical appearance, chemical properties, and general applications: used to treat heartburn and excessive gas caused by anxiety, gingivitis, hemorrhoids, and other forms of inflammation, treats slow-healing wounds, acne, psoriasis, eczema, diaper rash, chickenpox, and burns from cancer radiation therapy. Tinctures can be used in the bath to soak (hemorrhoids). Chamomile oil boiled with water, produces steam that when inhaled, alleviates some cold symptoms. In addition it has also been used to treat ulcers, colitis, diverticulosis and indigestion. Chamomile stimulates appetite, is used as a nerve tonic (calming), and aids sleep (insomnia).
Chamomile oil, at a concentration of 25 mg/mL, demonstrates antibacterial activity against such gram-positive bacteria as Bacillus subtilis, Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus mutans, and Streptococcus salivarius, as well as some fungicidal activity against
Candida albicans.2-4 Whole plant chamomile extract at 10 mg/mL demonstrates a similar effect, completely inhibiting growth of group B Streptococcus in vitro.3 In addition, chamomile extract blocks aggregation of Helicobacter pylori and various strains of Escherichia coli. Several pharmacological actions have been documented for German chamomile, based primarily on in vitro and animal studies. Such actions include antibacterial, antifungal, anti-inflammatory, antispasmodic, anti-ulcer, antiviral, and sedative effects. (study references upon request)
Although chamomile is generally safe to use, The U. S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has classified the oil and extract
of both German and Roman chamomile as substances. Generally Regarded As Safe (GRAS), if you have some predisposing conditions check with your physican first. If you are allergic to ragweed, do not use chamomile (either type) until you do a skin test to make sure it is ok (which it usually is, in dried form). If you take blood-thinning medication, you might avoid chamomile, but ask your physician first. In adults, oral administration for traditional uses are generally as follows: (1) dried flower heads: 2-8g as an infusion three times daily; (2) liquid extract/tincture: 1-6 mL up to three times daily of 1:1 potency; 7-15 mL up to three times daily of 1:5 potency.

Rosemary (ros marinus, meaning sea dew) - burnt for purification, used as a funerary herb and placed in the hands of the dead. Romans had knowledge of its antiseptic properties and used it in medicines also used to preserve foods. Rosemary water is used for outbreaks of mild acne and also for rashes.

Mallow (malva silvestris) - the very name suggests the plant's emollient qualities and hence its use in Roman times against inflammations of the skin. They also regarded it as a delicious food to eat. Mallow is also considered a sacred plant so certain restrictions applied in some circles.

Sulfur- the main choice for treatment, it has antiseptic properties that assist local immune response in rapidly eliminating infection because its hydrophilic properties penetrate the lesions. It also balances the ph of the skin which inhibits the lesions. In ancient Rome the acne sufferer would bathe in hot sulfur mineral baths to relieve the condition.Generally the application of topical sulfur was administered using Galbanum.

Galbanum (Ferula gummosa, syn. galbaniflua and Ferula rubricaulis). is an aromatic gum resin. Contains approx 8% terpenes; approx 65% of the resin which contains sulfur; approx 20% gum; and a small quantity of umbelliferone. Used by Hippocrates in medicine. Dioscorides writes that galbanum was used for its antispasmodic, diuretic, and pain-relieving properties. Pliny (Nat. Hist. xxiv. 13) writes of its extraordinary curative powers, concluding his account of it with the assertion that "the very touch of it mixed with oil of spondylium is sufficient to kill a serpent." It is also included in the OT account of the incense formula given to Moses by Yahweh (Exodus 30:34). Galbanum is one of the most ancient ingredients of incense with its pungent, acrid aroma and its excellent fixative qualities. The scent of galbanum has been strongly suggested to have an aphrodisiac effect with strong connection associated with both sexual and religious ecstasy. It is still used in Lebanon for Erectile Dysfunction. Galbanum is still used today in alternative and Ayurvedic medicine in addition to perfumery. As a plaster, Galbanum works well on skin infections and inflammation, such as boils, abscesses and skin ulcers (in additions to many other uses such as in respiratory illnesses, muscle/joint pain, wrinkles, aphrodisiac, menstrual and menopausal problems) For skin blemishes apply a tiny spot of resin to the area nightly (you can do this during the day but the resin is a deep amber color). FYI only: for ED or as an aphrodisiac, 50 gtts, immediately upon arising and just before retiring for four weeks; for menstruation/menopausal problems 50gtts three times daily after meals.

Bene vale in pacem Veneris

Julia
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71107 From: luciaiuliaaquila Date: 2009-10-13
Subject: Re: Roman Medicine
Salve Nero!

I am glad you enjoyed it!

Cura ut valeas,

Julia

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Nero" <rikudemyx@...> wrote:
>
> Salve,
> As I thought the past few days I've been with my guy leaving no time for posts but thank you for posting yours:)
> Very Interesting can't wait to read your paper.
> Di Vos Incolumes Custodiant.
> Nero
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "luciaiuliaaquila" <dis_pensible@> wrote:
> >
> > Julia Caecae sal,
> >
> > Yes Lavender was used for many reasons, in addition to flavoring foods, medicines(antiseptic, healing), purification rituals, insect repellant, scenting the baths, perfumes, skin care. I have a paper on it on my other computer and it will be included in TOV workshop pt 1 in November. It was originally known as nardus, sometimes seen translated as spikenard but eventually it was known as Lavandarius, derived from the Latin lavare "to wash", which you may be familiar with by now;)
> >
> > I will be adding more here as time permits, so watch for it!
> >
> > Vale amica,
> >
> > Julia
> >
> >
> > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Shoshana Hathaway" <shoshanahathaway@> wrote:
> > >
> > > Caeca Juliae sal,
> > >
> > > Thank you for this very interesting post. I did know some of this, but
> > > certainly not all, and not the great use made of honey and beeswax by the
> > > Romans. I wonder ...was lavender available to the Ancient Romans? As I am
> > > sure you know, lavender is an excellent help in healing burns, among other
> > > things, at least in essential oil form.
> > >
> > > Vale optime,
> > > C. Maria Caeca
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "luciaiuliaaquila" <dis_pensible@>
> > > To: <Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com>
> > > Sent: Friday, October 09, 2009 4:19 PM
> > > Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Roman Medicine
> > >
> > >
> > > Salvéte Omnes,
> > >
> > > Honey~ Focusing mainly on Wound Care and its adaptation to today's medicine.
> > >
> > > "Unwashed wool supplies very many remedies...it is applied..with honey to
> > > old sores. Wounds it heals if dipped in wine or vinegar..yolks of eggs..are
> > > taken for dysentery with the ash of their shells, poppy juice and wine. It
> > > is recommended to bathe the eyes with a decoction of the liver and to apply
> > > the marrow to those that are painful or swollen."
> > > ~Pliny
> > >
> > > The many attributes of Honey were very well known in the Ancient World, for
> > > its preservative value, its healing value, flavor and health properties.
> > > Women used honey to soften the skin as facial masks, in lip balm to sweeten
> > > one's kiss and a touch may have been added to perfumes or even to skin balms
> > > for obvious reasons. A skin softener from beeswax was also used which was
> > > made from boiling the beeswax in salt water. Pliny also describes using the
> > > broth of white beeswax and salt water to feed to those with dysentery. Honey
> > > was also used for food preservation in Ancient Rome and already was being
> > > used in embalming in other ancient cultures, although Ancient Roman citizens
> > > rarely buried their dead.
> > > Honey suppresses infection in wounds because of its high sugar content
> > > however due to its antibacterial components dressings do not have to be
> > > changed as often allowing the patients body to heal itself through its own
> > > defenses allowing autolytic debridement, re-epithelialization and the
> > > subsequent healing. Our ancient ancestors knew this through observation and
> > > success.
> > > Modern microbiological studies have shown more than one hundred-fold
> > > differences in the potency of the antibacterial activity of various types of
> > > honey with best results expected when using a honey with a high level of
> > > antibacterial activity. Something our ancient ancestors already knew. While
> > > discussing differences in honeys, Aristotle (384-322 BC) referred to pale
> > > honey as being "good as a salve for sore eyes and wounds." Dioscorides (c.50
> > > AD) wrote that pale yellow honey from Attica was the best: "good for all
> > > rotten and hollow ulcers".
> > > Today some still use honey with good results however in clinical settings,
> > > and at home, Hydrocolloids are often used to get similar effects without the
> > > mess; these are made of cellulose, guar, pectin and gelatin.
> > > The antibacterial activity of honey is due to hydrogen peroxide generated
> > > primarily by the action of an enzyme that the bees add to the nectar
> > > although there are some floral sources that provide additional antibacterial
> > > components. Honey is effective against Eschericihia coli and Staphylococcus
> > > aureus which are the most common causes of infected wounds. Our body tissues
> > > and serum contain catalase, which is a human enzyme that breaks down
> > > hydrogen. Catalase does not break down the antibacterial components that
> > > come from the nectar. The bee enzyme that produces hydrogen peroxide in
> > > honey needs oxygen to be available for the reaction, so care must be taken
> > > to aerate wounds under wound dressings or in wound cavities. The same bee
> > > enzyme that produces hydrogen peroxide in honey becomes active only when the
> > > acidity of honey is neutralized by body fluids.
> > > Manuka honey is recommended for modern use as it contains hydrogen peroxide
> > > activity as well as the component that comes from the nectar. It is also
> > > reportedly more stable in the presence of heat, light and can tolerate less
> > > oxygen in the event a closed bandage is needed. Unpasteurized honey, as was
> > > used in ancient Rome, should be used because the enzyme in honey that
> > > produces hydrogen peroxide is destroyed by heating and exposure to light so
> > > it should also be stored in a cool place and protected from light. Honey can
> > > be slightly warmed to liquefy it at no more than 37°C. It is interesting to
> > > note that in modern studies no case of infection resulting from the use of
> > > honey has been reported.
> > >
> > > Wound Care using Honey:
> > > 1. The amount of honey depends on the amount of fluid exuding from the
> > > wound.
> > > 2. The various beneficial effects of honey on wound tissues will be reduced
> > > or lost if small amounts of honey become diluted by large amounts of fluid.
> > > The frequency of dressing changes required will depend on how rapidly the
> > > honey is being diluted by fluid.
> > > 3. Daily dressing changes are usual however up to three times daily may be
> > > needed. If the dressing sticks to the wound this indicates that more
> > > frequent changes of dressing are needed. Exudation of fluid should be
> > > reduced by the anti-inflammatory action of honey, so less frequent dressing
> > > changes may be needed later - a few days between changes - this will give
> > > the wound a chance to re-epithelialize and heal using the body's own system.
> > > 4. More honey is required on deeper infections, to obtain an effective level
> > > of antibacterial activity diffusing deep into the wound tissues. Typically,
> > > 20 ml of honey (25 - 30 g, 1 ounce) is used on a 10 cm X 10 cm (4 inch X 4
> > > inch) dressing.
> > > 5. Occlusive (waterproof) or absorbent secondary dressings (Hydrocolloids)
> > > are needed to prevent honey oozing out from the wound dressing. (Occlusive
> > > dressings are better as they keep more of the honey in contact with the
> > > wound - absorbent dressings soak the honey away from the wound
> > > 6. Dressing pads impregnated with honey are the most convenient way of
> > > applying honey to surface wounds: it is best to spread the honey on the
> > > dressing rather than on the wound.
> > > 7. Abscesses, cavities and depressions in the wound bed are filled with
> > > honey before applying the honey dressing pad, so that the honey is in direct
> > > contact with the wound bed.
> > > 8. The honey dressings are cut to a size that extends beyond the edges of
> > > the wound and any surrounding inflamed area.
> > >
> > > There are many more uses for honey, some I use, others, I wouldn't:
> > >
> > > Mercurialis (de Arte Gymnast. Amstel. 4to. 1672, pp2, 3):
> > > "A blind soldier named Valerius Apes, having consulted the oracle, was
> > > informed that he should mix the blood of a white cock with honey, to make up
> > > an ointment to be applied to his eyes, for three consecutive days: he
> > > received his sight, and returned public thanks to the gods."
> > > "Julian appeared lost beyond all hope from a spitting of blood. The god
> > > ordered him to take from the altar some seeds of the pine, and to mix them
> > > with honey, of which mixture he was to eat for three days. He was saved, and
> > > came to thank the gods in presence of the people."
> > >
> > > I would not put chicken blood on any open wound or body opening in today's
> > > world. However if one has a sty I could see how a poultice of pure rose
> > > water and honey would help. In antiquity honey had a great reputation in
> > > producing clearer vision; this may also be one of the reasons for its
> > > reputation of endowing the power of divination - so it improves not only the
> > > physical but also the spiritual sight - a meta-magical construct.
> > > Pine seeds with honey are nutritious and contain thiamine, vitamin B1,
> > > pinoleic acid, magnesium, rich in iron (key component in hemoglobin that
> > > oxygen carrying pigment that supplies energy and contains more protein than
> > > any other seed/nut in addition to the highest concentration of Oleic
> > > acid(the stuff that lowers triglycerides) and have anti-inflammatory and
> > > antioxidant action. So Julian surely received some benefit and may have had
> > > an iron deficiency anemia- spitting up blood can be a symptom of anemia.
> > >
> > > Most of us have heard of Honey and lemon, or Honey and Rum (or another
> > > alcohol of choice) including Mulsum - all beneficial and all having origins
> > > in ancient times. Oxymel, a mixture of honey, vinegar, salt, and water was
> > > not just used in preparing vegetables was also a cure for throat and ear
> > > problems. Hydromel (when fermented makes mead) and aqua mulsa, a
> > > honey-water, were also used as medicine. A tonic of cinnamon and honey were
> > > used to treat cold and sore throats, the antibacterial properties of
> > > cinnamon are for another time ;)
> > > . Hippocrates considered honey a very good expectorant and said of its
> > > virtues: "It causes heat, cleans sores and ulcers, softens hard ulcers of
> > > the lips, heals carbuncles and running sores." He recommended honey for
> > > difficulty in breathing due to its expectorant qualities: "it causes
> > > spitting." This has credence in modern treatment.
> > > . Dioscorides in Materia Medica often mentions honey as an excellent
> > > medicine in addition to beeswax, propolis and honey- wie. He also praises
> > > the medicinal value of wax, propolis and honey-wine. This also has credence
> > > in modern treatment.
> > > . Cornelius Celsus in De Medicina stated that a physician must heal in a
> > > safe, quick and pleasing manner "tuto, cito et jucunde", which could be best
> > > accomplished with honey.
> > > . Galen recommended the mixing of four parts of honey with one part of gall
> > > of the sea-tortoise which, when dropped into the eyes, would improve the
> > > sight. He also recommended a paste of honey and dead bees for hair growth:
> > > "Take Bees dead in combs, and when they are through dry make them into
> > > powder, mingle them with the honey in which they died and anoint the parts
> > > of the Head that are bald and thin-haired, and you shall see them grow
> > > again."
> > > . Marcellus: "The honey pure and neat wherein the Bees are dead, let that
> > > drop into the eyes; or honey mixed with the ashes of the heads of Bees,
> > > makes the eyes very clear." Today in India they still make a kohl that even
> > > children wear to protect and nourish their eyes, it is made of ash, beeswax,
> > > a touch of camphor and in some cases a touch of honey (although this is
> > > usually ceremonial). It is supposed to make the eyes healthy, clear the
> > > whites and make the eyes shine.
> > > . Pliny also credited honey in which bees have died with the faculty of
> > > relieving dullness of sight and hearing. Pliny burned the bees, mixed their
> > > ashes with honey and used the substance for all kinds of ailments: "Powdered
> > > bees with milk, wine or honey will surely cure dropsy, dissolve gravel and
> > > stones, will open all passages of urine and cure the stopping of the
> > > bladder. Bees pounded with honey cure griping of the belly." Honey can be
> > > soothing to some abdominal pain in small amounts; it can also be a laxative
> > > in larger amounts. Clear fluids are better for stones and bladder problems
> > > though.
> > > . Celsus prescribed raw honey as a laxative and boiled honey as a cure for
> > > diarrhea: "the acrimony is taken away by boyling which wont to move the
> > > belly and to diminish the virtue of the food" (Libr. 3 C. 3). Again, it is
> > > dependant on amounts and how the individual reacts to the honey.
> > > . Claudius Aelianus (Aelian) believed that honey from Pontus cured epilepsy.
> > > I would have to see what else is in that honey, and if perhaps the
> > > "seizures" may have been due to a blood glucose imbalance;)
> > > . Porphyry believed honey had four excellent qualities: 1) nourishing food
> > > 2) a good cleanser 3) healing power 4) pleasant due to its sweetness. I
> > > concur.
> > > . Aristoxenus believed anyone who eats honey, spring onions and bread for
> > > his daily breakfast will be free from all diseases for life.
> > >
> > > Well this is all I have for today!
> > >
> > > Cúrá ut valeás optimé!
> > >
> > > Julia
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > ------------------------------------
> > >
> > > Yahoo! Groups Links
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > No virus found in this incoming message.
> > > Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> > > Version: 8.5.421 / Virus Database: 270.14.8/2425 - Release Date: 10/09/09
> > > 08:10:00
> > >
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71108 From: luciaiuliaaquila Date: 2009-10-13
Subject: Re: Latin phrase of the day.
Salve Pauline,

I am glad you enjoyed it, my pleasure,

Vale,

Julia
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71109 From: gualterus_graecus Date: 2009-10-13
Subject: Re: Classic Poetry, Prose, Proems, Literature Excerpts
Salve,

Before the bash you should get a copy of Felton's, _Haunted Greece and Rome: Ghost Stories from Classical Antiquity_. You'll have a lot more goodies to share! Although, the book doesn't just relate various stories but also discusses the genre of ghost stories in general in antiquity. It should spark some good conversation.

Vale,

Gualterus

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "luciaiuliaaquila" <dis_pensible@...> wrote:
>
> Salvete Omnes,
>
> I am preparing for a Halloween Bash in Nashville this weekend and part of that planning is to tell ghost stories. So I would like to share one of the Roman genre, most of you have probably heard this one before but a good story bears repeating:
>
>
>
> An Ancient Ghost Story by Pliny the Younger
>
> Erat Athenis spatiosa et magna domus, sed infamis et pestilens. Per silentium noctis sonus ferri et strepitus vinculorum procul, tum e proximo auditi sunt. Mox apparebat senex macie et squalore confectus, qui barbam magnam et capillos villosos habebat; pedibus et manibus catenas habebat.
>
> Inhabitantes domus(gen) noctes diras et non somnum habebant. Morbus et etiam mors ex timore veniebant. Deserta et damna casa in silentio remanebat. Titulum positum est, sed nemo casam desideravit. Venit Athenas philosophus Athenodorus. Legit titulum, et pretio audito, multa rogat. Omnia audit, sed tamen casam capit.
>
> In vespera, Athenodorus lumen, stilum, et pugillares in prima parte casae posuit; tum omnes servos dimittit. Animum, oculos, et manum cum pugillaribus occupat, quod vacua mens multos timores fingit.
>
> Primo silentium est. Tum vincula procul audiuntur. Philosophus oculos non movet; stilo scribit. Soni in casa, tum in camera sunt. Athenodorus spectat; figuram videt. Senex stat et digito vocat. Athenodorus stilum iterum capit. Vincula audiuntur super caput. Nunc philosophus lumen capit. Senex tarde ad ianuam ambulat, et Athenodorus etiam ambulat post senem. In area casae senex philosophum deserit. Desertus philosophus in loco herbas ponit.
>
> Postero die magistratum vocat et magistratus locum effodit. Ossa inserta in vinculis invenit, et, collecta, publice sepeliuntur. Numquam iterum senex videbatur.
>
> There was in Athens a house, spacious and open, but with an infamous reputation, as if filled with pestilence. For in the dead of night, a noise like the clashing of iron could be heard. And if one listened carefully, it sounded like the rattling of chains. At first the noise seemed to be at a distance, but then it would approach, nearer, nearer, nearer. Suddenly a phantom would appear, an old man, pale and emaciated, with a long beard, and hair that appeared driven by the wind. The fetters on his feet and hands rattled as he moved them.
> Any dwellers in the house passed sleepless nights under the most dismal terrors imaginable. The nights without rest led them to a kind of madness, and as the horrors in their minds increased, onto a path toward death. Even in the daytime--when the phantom did not appear--the memory of the nightmare was so strong that it still passed before their eyes. The terror remained when the cause of it was gone.
> Damned as uninhabitable, the house was at last deserted, left to the spectral monster. But in hope that some tenant might be found who was unaware of the malevolence within it, the house was posted for rent or sale.
> It happened that a philosopher named Athenodorus came to Athens at that time. Reading the posted bill, he discovered the dwelling's price. The extraordinary cheapness raised his suspicion, yet when he heard the whole story, he was not in the least put off. Indeed, he was eager to take the place. And did so immediately.
> As evening drew near, Athenodorus had a couch prepared for him in the front section of the house. He asked for a light and his writing materials, then dismissed his retainers. To keep his mind from being distracted by vain terrors of imaginary noises and apparitions, he directed all his energy toward his writing.
> For a time the night was silent. Then came the rattling of fetters. Athenodorus neither lifted up his eyes, nor laid down his pen. Instead he closed his ears by concentrating on his work. But the noise increased and advanced closer till it seemed to be at the door, and at last in the very chamber. Athenodorus looked round and saw the apparition exactly as it had been described to him. It stood before him, beckoning with one finger.
> Athenodorus made a sign with his hand that the visitor should wait a little, and bent over his work. The ghost, however, shook the chains over the philosopher's head, beckoning as before. Athenodorus now took up his lamp and followed. The ghost moved slowly, as if held back by his chains. Once it reached the courtyard, it suddenly vanished.
> Athenodorus, now deserted, carefully marked the spot with a handful of grass and leaves. The next day he asked the magistrate to have the spot dug up. There they found--intertwined with chains--the bones that were all that remained of a body that had long lain in the ground. Carefully, the skeletal relics were collected and given proper burial, at public expense. The tortured ancient was at rest. And the house in Athens was haunted no more.
>
> Valete optime,
>
> Julia
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71110 From: luciaiuliaaquila Date: 2009-10-13
Subject: Re: Classic Poetry, Prose, Proems, Literature Excerpts
Salve,

Thank you Gaultere! I'll see if i can get one tomorrow!

Btw, I have not forgotten about our recent conversation - just got very busy and as soon as i have some more time to devote to it I'll search for it and bring it back up...

Vale,

Julia


--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "gualterus_graecus" <waltms1@...> wrote:
>
> Salve,
>
> Before the bash you should get a copy of Felton's, _Haunted Greece and Rome: Ghost Stories from Classical Antiquity_. You'll have a lot more goodies to share! Although, the book doesn't just relate various stories but also discusses the genre of ghost stories in general in antiquity. It should spark some good conversation.
>
> Vale,
>
> Gualterus
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "luciaiuliaaquila" <dis_pensible@> wrote:
> >
> > Salvete Omnes,
> >
> > I am preparing for a Halloween Bash in Nashville this weekend and part of that planning is to tell ghost stories. So I would like to share one of the Roman genre, most of you have probably heard this one before but a good story bears repeating:
> >
> >
> >
> > An Ancient Ghost Story by Pliny the Younger
> >
> > Erat Athenis spatiosa et magna domus, sed infamis et pestilens. Per silentium noctis sonus ferri et strepitus vinculorum procul, tum e proximo auditi sunt. Mox apparebat senex macie et squalore confectus, qui barbam magnam et capillos villosos habebat; pedibus et manibus catenas habebat.
> >
> > Inhabitantes domus(gen) noctes diras et non somnum habebant. Morbus et etiam mors ex timore veniebant. Deserta et damna casa in silentio remanebat. Titulum positum est, sed nemo casam desideravit. Venit Athenas philosophus Athenodorus. Legit titulum, et pretio audito, multa rogat. Omnia audit, sed tamen casam capit.
> >
> > In vespera, Athenodorus lumen, stilum, et pugillares in prima parte casae posuit; tum omnes servos dimittit. Animum, oculos, et manum cum pugillaribus occupat, quod vacua mens multos timores fingit.
> >
> > Primo silentium est. Tum vincula procul audiuntur. Philosophus oculos non movet; stilo scribit. Soni in casa, tum in camera sunt. Athenodorus spectat; figuram videt. Senex stat et digito vocat. Athenodorus stilum iterum capit. Vincula audiuntur super caput. Nunc philosophus lumen capit. Senex tarde ad ianuam ambulat, et Athenodorus etiam ambulat post senem. In area casae senex philosophum deserit. Desertus philosophus in loco herbas ponit.
> >
> > Postero die magistratum vocat et magistratus locum effodit. Ossa inserta in vinculis invenit, et, collecta, publice sepeliuntur. Numquam iterum senex videbatur.
> >
> > There was in Athens a house, spacious and open, but with an infamous reputation, as if filled with pestilence. For in the dead of night, a noise like the clashing of iron could be heard. And if one listened carefully, it sounded like the rattling of chains. At first the noise seemed to be at a distance, but then it would approach, nearer, nearer, nearer. Suddenly a phantom would appear, an old man, pale and emaciated, with a long beard, and hair that appeared driven by the wind. The fetters on his feet and hands rattled as he moved them.
> > Any dwellers in the house passed sleepless nights under the most dismal terrors imaginable. The nights without rest led them to a kind of madness, and as the horrors in their minds increased, onto a path toward death. Even in the daytime--when the phantom did not appear--the memory of the nightmare was so strong that it still passed before their eyes. The terror remained when the cause of it was gone.
> > Damned as uninhabitable, the house was at last deserted, left to the spectral monster. But in hope that some tenant might be found who was unaware of the malevolence within it, the house was posted for rent or sale.
> > It happened that a philosopher named Athenodorus came to Athens at that time. Reading the posted bill, he discovered the dwelling's price. The extraordinary cheapness raised his suspicion, yet when he heard the whole story, he was not in the least put off. Indeed, he was eager to take the place. And did so immediately.
> > As evening drew near, Athenodorus had a couch prepared for him in the front section of the house. He asked for a light and his writing materials, then dismissed his retainers. To keep his mind from being distracted by vain terrors of imaginary noises and apparitions, he directed all his energy toward his writing.
> > For a time the night was silent. Then came the rattling of fetters. Athenodorus neither lifted up his eyes, nor laid down his pen. Instead he closed his ears by concentrating on his work. But the noise increased and advanced closer till it seemed to be at the door, and at last in the very chamber. Athenodorus looked round and saw the apparition exactly as it had been described to him. It stood before him, beckoning with one finger.
> > Athenodorus made a sign with his hand that the visitor should wait a little, and bent over his work. The ghost, however, shook the chains over the philosopher's head, beckoning as before. Athenodorus now took up his lamp and followed. The ghost moved slowly, as if held back by his chains. Once it reached the courtyard, it suddenly vanished.
> > Athenodorus, now deserted, carefully marked the spot with a handful of grass and leaves. The next day he asked the magistrate to have the spot dug up. There they found--intertwined with chains--the bones that were all that remained of a body that had long lain in the ground. Carefully, the skeletal relics were collected and given proper burial, at public expense. The tortured ancient was at rest. And the house in Athens was haunted no more.
> >
> > Valete optime,
> >
> > Julia
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71111 From: Cato Date: 2009-10-13
Subject: Re: Classic Poetry, Prose, Proems, Literature Excerpts
Cato Iuliae aquilae sal.

Salve.

I meant what I said. Precisely.

Oh - I, like most orators, point with my whole hand.

Vale,

Cato


--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "luciaiuliaaquila" <dis_pensible@...> wrote:
>
> Iulia Equitio Catoni omnibusque in foro S.P.D.
>
>
> Alas Senator Cato, it is that time of the year for us again – to engage in the topic of politics. It makes me sigh a bit because it puts me in mind of close personal friends with whom I never discuss politics because, despite our enjoyment of each others company, our politics are vastly different and at times at odds. Unfortunately you and I do not have that luxury to put it aside at this time of the year, and truly it is not so much our goals for the Res Publica that are so different but the way we both go about it, our perceptions and our methods.
> I, once again, am not surprised that you zeroed in on the quote I posted on Tacitus, esp. that segment;) to which you replied:
>
> >Precisely.
>
> Precisely SENATOR Cato?
> You as a Senator, a member of the Senate, should be more careful of such precision. I ask you to consider this: when you point your finger, Senator, so precisely - precisely three fingers point back at you.
>
> Cúráte ut valéatis atque di vos incolumes custodiant.
>
> Julia
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71112 From: Timothy or Stephen Gallagher Date: 2009-10-13
Subject: Re: Books are ( fill in the blank)
Salve Julia,
 
WOW!!!!    Is that yours??  Very nicely done!!!
 
Vale
 
Paulinus

 

To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
From: dis_pensible@...
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2009 23:16:14 +0000
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Books are ( fill in the blank)

 
Salvéte omnes,

This is in response to Censor Paulinus' very nice offering of "Books are."
It did not get much play because it just was not controversial enough – and Romans' love controversy. Or do they?
I believe a few Novi Romani think this is true. I still believe some of this is due to the RPG influence, however - well here is my submission based purely on personal observation and opinion, with a little jest but with truth as I see it:

Books are made from trees
With many branches,
That leads to knowledge,
That leads to wisdom.
That leads to entertainment.
They touch our lives.
Books are reflections of life,
Books are examples of life,
Books are not life.
Without life books would not exist.

Some emulate prominent figures in history
Whether historical or fiction.
Still some act as historical characters
Culled from such fiction.
So, when the stories are read –
Readers' may, to some degree or other,
Give an invented animus to the characters
Forged by their own innate imagination
To enjoy a unique, personal experience,
As books leave much to the imagination.

When acting transfers to real life
This acting lacks Real Animus,
It then becomes pale reflections
Of that which it seeks to emulate;
So suffers the actor's credibility
As does the relevance to the current age.
And so Books are enlightening too,
For lately I have enjoyed two books,
Roman Republic Historical fiction.
Now I am illuminated by knowledge
They've been enjoyed by those I know

For now I recognize fictional characters
In a few of those modern "Romans"
Who play - act yet lack the animus verus
Of those Ancients they play at.

Valéte optimé,

Julia

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com, "ugo21121970" <ugo.coppola@ ...> wrote:
>
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com, Timothy or Stephen Gallagher
> <spqr753@> wrote:
> >
> > Ok putting aside politics for the moment lets have some fun! You must
> fill in with an appropriate quote OR something of your own.
> >
> >
> >
> > It must start... Books are....
>
> This is a slogan for a campaign about book reading by the Italian
> Ministry of Culture, but I find it quite poetical, so I'm quoting it
> here:
>
> "Books are doors which open into worlds of boundless imagination -
> whenever you want them to."
>
> Bene vale, et valete,
> P. Annæus Constantinus Placidus
>


Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71113 From: luciaiuliaaquila Date: 2009-10-13
Subject: Re: Classic Poetry, Prose, Proems, Literature Excerpts
Salve,

*laughs* Oh... so you're an Orator...

Vale,

Julia

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Cato" <catoinnyc@...> wrote:
>
> Cato Iuliae aquilae sal.
>
> Salve.
>
> I meant what I said. Precisely.
>
> Oh - I, like most orators, point with my whole hand.
>
> Vale,
>
> Cato
>
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "luciaiuliaaquila" <dis_pensible@> wrote:
> >
> > Iulia Equitio Catoni omnibusque in foro S.P.D.
> >
> >
> > Alas Senator Cato, it is that time of the year for us again – to engage in the topic of politics. It makes me sigh a bit because it puts me in mind of close personal friends with whom I never discuss politics because, despite our enjoyment of each others company, our politics are vastly different and at times at odds. Unfortunately you and I do not have that luxury to put it aside at this time of the year, and truly it is not so much our goals for the Res Publica that are so different but the way we both go about it, our perceptions and our methods.
> > I, once again, am not surprised that you zeroed in on the quote I posted on Tacitus, esp. that segment;) to which you replied:
> >
> > >Precisely.
> >
> > Precisely SENATOR Cato?
> > You as a Senator, a member of the Senate, should be more careful of such precision. I ask you to consider this: when you point your finger, Senator, so precisely - precisely three fingers point back at you.
> >
> > Cúráte ut valéatis atque di vos incolumes custodiant.
> >
> > Julia
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71114 From: luciaiuliaaquila Date: 2009-10-13
Subject: Re: Books are ( fill in the blank)
Salve Paulinus,

Once again I thank you - they're just simple strings of words masquerading as a semblance of prose, you are too kind. I am glad you are pleased, one could not ask for more.

Vale, bonam noctem tibi exopto,

Julia

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Timothy or Stephen Gallagher <spqr753@...> wrote:
>
>
> Salve Julia,
>
>
>
> WOW!!!! Is that yours?? Very nicely done!!!
>
>
>
> Vale
>
>
>
> Paulinus
>
>
>
>
>
> To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> From: dis_pensible@...
> Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2009 23:16:14 +0000
> Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Books are ( fill in the blank)
>
>
>
>
>
> Salvéte omnes,
>
> This is in response to Censor Paulinus' very nice offering of "Books are."
> It did not get much play because it just was not controversial enough – and Romans' love controversy. Or do they?
> I believe a few Novi Romani think this is true. I still believe some of this is due to the RPG influence, however - well here is my submission based purely on personal observation and opinion, with a little jest but with truth as I see it:
>
> Books are made from trees
> With many branches,
> That leads to knowledge,
> That leads to wisdom.
> That leads to entertainment.
> They touch our lives.
> Books are reflections of life,
> Books are examples of life,
> Books are not life.
> Without life books would not exist.
>
> Some emulate prominent figures in history
> Whether historical or fiction.
> Still some act as historical characters
> Culled from such fiction.
> So, when the stories are read –
> Readers' may, to some degree or other,
> Give an invented animus to the characters
> Forged by their own innate imagination
> To enjoy a unique, personal experience,
> As books leave much to the imagination.
>
> When acting transfers to real life
> This acting lacks Real Animus,
> It then becomes pale reflections
> Of that which it seeks to emulate;
> So suffers the actor's credibility
> As does the relevance to the current age.
> And so Books are enlightening too,
> For lately I have enjoyed two books,
> Roman Republic Historical fiction.
> Now I am illuminated by knowledge
> They've been enjoyed by those I know
>
> For now I recognize fictional characters
> In a few of those modern "Romans"
> Who play - act yet lack the animus verus
> Of those Ancients they play at.
>
> Valéte optimé,
>
> Julia
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "ugo21121970" <ugo.coppola@> wrote:
> >
> >
> > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Timothy or Stephen Gallagher
> > <spqr753@> wrote:
> > >
> > > Ok putting aside politics for the moment lets have some fun! You must
> > fill in with an appropriate quote OR something of your own.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > It must start... Books are....
> >
> > This is a slogan for a campaign about book reading by the Italian
> > Ministry of Culture, but I find it quite poetical, so I'm quoting it
> > here:
> >
> > "Books are doors which open into worlds of boundless imagination -
> > whenever you want them to."
> >
> > Bene vale, et valete,
> > P. Annæus Constantinus Placidus
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71115 From: Cato Date: 2009-10-14
Subject: prid. Id. Oct.
Cato omnibus in foro SPD

Salvete omnes!

Hodiernus dies est pridie Idus Octobris; haec dies endotercisus est.

"All crossed over. They then followed Decius as he moved through the
intervals between the pickets. They had already got as far as the
center of the Samnite lines when a soldier striding over the bodies of
the sleeping sentinels made a noise by striking his shield against one
of them. The sentinel awakened by the sound shook the one next him;
they both jumped up and aroused others, not knowing whether friends or
foes were amongst them, whether it was Decius' force breaking out or
the consul capturing the camp. As they were no longer unobserved,
Decius ordered his men to raise a shout, which paralysed the
half-awakened sleepers with terror. In their confusion they were
unable to seize their arms promptly and could neither offer any
resistance nor follow up their assailants. While the Samnites were in
this state of confusion and panic, the Romans, cutting down all who
opposed them, made their way in the direction of the consul's camp. A
considerable portion of the night still remained and they were
evidently now in safety. Decius addressed them: "All honour to you,
brave Romans! your march up that height and your return will be
extolled in every age. But for the due recognition of such courage the
light of day is needed; you have deserved something more than to carry
your glory back to camp hidden in the silence of the night. We will
rest here and wait for the daylight." They rested accordingly. As soon
as it was light and the news was sent on to the consul in camp, there
was great excitement and rejoicing, and when it was officially
announced throughout the camp that the men who saved the army at the
risk of their own lives had themselves returned safe and sound, they
all poured out in crowds to meet them, showered congratulations upon
them, gave thanks and praise to the gods, and extolled Decius to the
skies. He marched through the camp in what amounted to a triumphal
procession with his small force fully armed. Every eye was fixed upon
him; the military tribune was treated with as much distinction as if
he had been a consul. When he reached the headquarters' tent, the
consul ordered the Assembly to be sounded. He was beginning to give
Decius the praise he had so well earned, before the whole army, when
Decius interrupted him and begged him to postpone those proceedings in
view of the splendid opportunity which they now had in their hands. He
accordingly dismissed the parade and followed Decius' advice, which
was to attack the enemy before they had recovered from their nocturnal
panic and were still stationed round the height in separate
detachments; some who had been sent in pursuit were believed to be
still defiling through the pass. The legions were ordered to arm for
battle and were conducted by a more open route towards the enemy, as
scouting parties had brought back fuller information about the
locality. The attack was sudden and unexpected; the Samnites were
everywhere in scattered bodies, most of them without arms, unable to
secure their weapons or get into any compact formation or retire
within their entrenchments. They were first driven in panic into their
camp, then the camp itself was rushed and captured. The shouting
rolled round the height and the detachments who had been posted to
watch it fled from a foe whom they had not yet seen. Those who had
fled panic-struck into their camp-some 30,000-were all slain." - Livy,
History of Rome 7.35


In the Norse countries, today was celebrated as Vinternatsblot, or
Winter's Day. The longboats were stored and preparations began to
deal with the coming winter season.

"The images of the gods were placed in a half-circle in the shrine. At
the center stood the altar (stallr), upon which lay a large gold ring
(baugr), upon which all solemn oaths were sworn. The bowl containing
the blood of the sacrificed animals (hlautbolli) was placed on the
altar by the priest (gothi), who, with a stick (hlautteinn), sprinkled
it on the images of the gods, and on the persons present. The meat of
the animals was boiled, and served to the assembled people in the
large hall of the temple, where toasts were drunk to the gods for
victory and good harvests. The sanctuary and the grounds belonging to
it was called ve, a holy or sacred place, and any one who violated its
sanctity was called varg i veum (wolf in the sanctuary), and was
outlawed. Three religious festivals were held each year: one at the
beginning of winter (October 14), the vinternatsblot, or haustblot, to
bid winter welcome; another at midwinter (January 14), midvintersblot,
for peace and good harvest; and a third, sommerblot, held on the first
day of summer (April 14), for victory on military expeditions." - Knut
Gjerset, Ph.D., "History Of The Norwegian People" p. 105


Valete!

Cato
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71116 From: Cato Date: 2009-10-14
Subject: Re: Classic Poetry, Prose, Proems, Literature Excerpts
Cato Iuliae Aquilae sal.

Salve!

Higgledy-piggledy,
Iulia Aquila
Stands on a soap-box
To put us to shame;
"You're just imagining,
ultraromantically,
BEING the ancient
Who once bore your name!

"Cato, Petronius
Caesar, Tiberius,
Sulla and Iulia all
once stood proud
there in the Forum where,
prepanlinguistically,
Latin orations once
stirred up the crowd.

They are all dust now,"
says Iulia Aquila,
frowning at bringing these
Romans new life.
"You cannot possibly
egomaniacally
model on them without
causing us strife!"

Higgledy-piggledy,
Cato respondit, "Oh
Iulia Aquila, don't be so glum!
Novoromani,
in togae and pullae, can
enthusiastically
make this place hum!"


Vale!

Cato
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71117 From: Timothy or Stephen Gallagher Date: 2009-10-14
Subject: Larin Phrase of the Day
Salvete,
 
Multi famam, conscientiam pauci verentur - Many fear their reputation, few their conscience. (Pliny)
 
Valete,
 
Ti. Galerius Paulinus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71118 From: shantipole2001 Date: 2009-10-14
Subject: I want to get involved but...
I have been following Nova Roma for years and love what it stands for. My background is in the law and international politics and I have always wanted to take that extra step and get involved with NR as I believe the idea that was Rome still has resonance today.

Unfortunately, whenever I check in to this list to see what is happening (which is getting less and less frequent)I always see the same thing, constant arguments that seem to descend into name calling with people quitting or threatening to quit and no real decorum and certainly very little real debate.

I am sure the majority of the members of NR want this organization to flourish. A lot has been accomplished and much more can be done to present the group as a legitimate social, historical, legal and even political organization that represents the ideals of what ancient Rome was built on. I am all for passionate debate and the art of rhetoric but I can only assume that I am not alone when I read some of the petty squabbling that goes on here and just shake my head and move on. And that does not bode well for building NR into an active, viable organization that can move beyond its virtual roots to something more concrete.

Anyhow that is my opinion as an outsider looking in. You can all take it for what it is worth. I invite all to respond to my concerns especially those of you who have been members for awhile and feel I am off base.

All the best!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71119 From: rory12001 Date: 2009-10-14
Subject: Re: I want to get involved but...
Salve Mark;
I've been in Nova Roma since 2003 and agree with you.

At the same time I've taken Spoken Latin at Academia Thules, was taking Rhetoric before the server crashed; had passionate debates about philosophy at our first coventus with wonderful friends, participated in rituals to the gods.

Nova Roma can be so great when you share the vision and live your Romanitas; the values of Ancient Rome. It has immeasurably enriched my life since that very first day and given me my closest friends.
bene vale in pacem deorum
M. Hortensia Maior


--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "shantipole2001" <mark@...> wrote:
>
> I have been following Nova Roma for years and love what it stands for. My background is in the law and international politics and I have always wanted to take that extra step and get involved with NR as I believe the idea that was Rome still has resonance today.
>
> Unfortunately, whenever I check in to this list to see what is happening (which is getting less and less frequent)I always see the same thing, constant arguments that seem to descend into name calling with people quitting or threatening to quit and no real decorum and certainly very little real debate.
>
> I am sure the majority of the members of NR want this organization to flourish. A lot has been accomplished and much more can be done to present the group as a legitimate social, historical, legal and even political organization that represents the ideals of what ancient Rome was built on. I am all for passionate debate and the art of rhetoric but I can only assume that I am not alone when I read some of the petty squabbling that goes on here and just shake my head and move on. And that does not bode well for building NR into an active, viable organization that can move beyond its virtual roots to something more concrete.
>
> Anyhow that is my opinion as an outsider looking in. You can all take it for what it is worth. I invite all to respond to my concerns especially those of you who have been members for awhile and feel I am off base.
>
> All the best!
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71120 From: luciaiuliaaquila Date: 2009-10-14
Subject: Re: Classic Poetry, Prose, Proems, Literature Excerpts
Salvete Omnes,

First I shall begin with a couple of excerpts from Q. Horatii Flacci (Horace), than an offering from Persius and finally from Plutarch:

Maxima pars uatum, pater et iuuenes patre digni,
decipimur specie recti. Breuis esse laboro
obscurus fio; sectantem leuia nerui
deficiunt animique; professus grandia turget;
serpit humi tutus nimium timidusque procellae;
qui uariare cupit rem prodigialiter unam,
delphinum siluis adpingit, fluctibus aprum
In uitium ducit culpae fuga, si caret arte.
The great majority of us poets, father, and youths worthy such a father, are misled by the appearance of right. I labor to be concise, I become obscure: nerves and spirit fail him, that aims at the easy: one, that pretends to be sublime, proves bombastical: he who is too cautious and fearful of the storm, crawls along the ground: he who wants to vary his subject in a marvelous manner, paints the dolphin in the woods, the boar in the sea. The avoiding of an error leads to a fault, if it lack skill.
Horace Ars Poetica

Atqui si vitiis mediocribus ac mea paucis
mendosa est natura, alioqui recta, velut si
egregio inspersos reprehendas corpore naevos,
si neque avaritiam neque sordes nec mala lustra
obiciet vere quisquam mihi, purus et insons,
ut me collaudem, si et vivo carus amicis...
at hoc nunc
laus illi debetur et a me gratia maior.
nil me paeniteat sanum patris huius, eoque
non, ut magna dolo factum negat esse suo pars,
quod non ingenuos habeat clarosque parentis,
sic me defendam.
If my character is flawed by a few minor faults, but is otherwise decent and moral, if you can point out only a few scattered blemishes on an otherwise immaculate surface, if no one can accuse me of greed, or of prurience, or of profligacy, if I live a virtuous life, free of defilement (pardon, for a moment, my self-praise), and if I am to my friends a good friend, my father deserves all the credit... As it is now, he deserves from me unstinting gratitude and praise. I could never be ashamed of such a father, nor do I feel any need, as many people do, to apologize for being a freedman's son.
Horace Book I, satire vi, lines 65-92

Persius : "o curas hominum! o quantum est in rebus inane!"
Adversarius: "quis leget haec?"
Persius: "min tu istud ais?
nemo hercule."
Adversarius: "nemo?"
Persius: "Oh the cares of human beings! O how much emptiness there is in things!"
Adversary: "Who shall read these things?"
Persius: "You ask me that?
By Hercules, nobody?"
Persius Satire 1 1-3

Now this is from Plutarch, from "Lives of Noble Grecians and Romans", regarding Cato the Younger, who due to his stubbornness, inflexibility and temper was brought many times to embarrassment and to a very bad end. Now no one can say he was not a great man of accomplishment, however he could have learned from his errors, a little introspection and knowing when to fold his hand may have further him to an even more elevated memory. My comment is this, if one is deigned to emulate him, then he too should not make the mistakes Cato made and learn from his own mistakes and further his own knowledge and techniques. Just my opinion:

"It is said of Cato that even from his infancy, in his speech, his countenance, and all his childish pastimes, he discovered an inflexible temper, unmoved by any passion, and firm in everything. He was resolute in his purposes, much beyond the strength of his age, to go through with whatever he undertook. He was rough and ungentle toward those that flattered him, and still more unyielding to those who threatened him. It was difficult to excite him to laughter, his countenance seldom relaxed even into a smile; he was not quickly or easily provoked to anger, but if once incensed, he was no less difficult to pacify.
When he began to learn, he proved dull, and slow to apprehend, but of what he once received, his memory was remarkably tenacious. And such in fact, we find generally to be the course of nature; men of fine genius are readily reminded of things, but those who receive with most pains and difficulty, remember best; every new thing they learn, being, as it were, burnt and branded in on their minds. Cato's natural stubbornness and slowness to be persuaded may also have made it more difficult for him to be taught. For to learn is to submit to have something done to one; and persuasion comes soonest to those who have least strength to resist it."

To Equitius Cato*laughs* is your mind so higgledy-piggledy that you stayed up half the night composing a mediocre – composition- to insert your erroneous perceived motivations into my words? Is there some truth in the words of my offhand mediocre (yes it is far from exceptional) satire that hit home with you? It appears so. This is not your finest moment Cato, and here again higgledy-piggledy is another phrase, a puerile one at that, that phrase is really sort of "old," over-used and probably could be viewed as plagiarism. But the piece did make me laugh, and that was good.
Of course why you are not actively campaigning, in a thread of your own making, rather than hijacking other threads as you move your soap box around so they are thusly polluted to your own whim, is a question only you can answer esp. since the citizens have many times in the past several months called for a cessation of this activity and for threads in which they can read Ancient Roman topics without such debate. I am not even running for any office so perhaps you should conserve your energy for those who will run against you, whoever they may be. Perhaps you might even give some thought as to how you will go about listening to the people and finding out what they want to further the Res Publica rather than just acting out settling of scores. This only leads to back-sliding my friend, to be a good candidate for consul you have to offer the people something for the future. I am not suggesting you let go completely, but now is not the time Cato to put your energy into just one area, if you win the election than you can see to these areas you see as problematic, but to persist now only serves to weaken your candidacy. This is sound advice. See to your campaign, mingle amongst the people and learn from them, do your homework and be careful about advice from a mob that has many axes to grind or they will grind your campaign to a halt. I am very serious about this.
I repeat I am not running for any office – I do not plan to – I am just a simple artist of ink, paint, canvas clay and words– an average citizen. And so I offer you some equally bad poetry, if it can even be called that – probably worse than yours because this is off the top of my head, I do truly hope it makes you chuckle because it is offered good-naturedly:

There once was a Cato from New York
Who truly liked to squawk et balk
His words were unexceptional
His thoughts unoriginal
His mouth better filled with a cork.

Now Cato, he thought he was fine
Especially when he had too much wine
He thought he would show it
Prove he was a poet
But all that came out was a whine.

Old Cato knew those he would foil
So in his own head he would toil
Never admit he was wrong
Kept singing his song
And buried his career* in the soil.


Cúrá ut valeás optimé!

Julia

*political career
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71121 From: Cato Date: 2009-10-14
Subject: Re: Classic Poetry, Prose, Proems, Literature Excerpts
Cato Iuliae Aquilae omnibusque in Foro SPD

Salvete!

Just FYI, it's called a "double dactyl", and traditionally starts off "higgledy-piggledy". It's *meant* to be goofy. Lighthearted. Silly, even. I've been writing them for years.

I even re-wrote the entire first book of "The Aenead" in double-dactyls :)

Valete!

Cato
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71122 From: luciaiuliaaquila Date: 2009-10-14
Subject: Re: Classic Poetry, Prose, Proems, Literature Excerpts
Ave Cato,

>Just FYI, it's called a "double dactyl", and traditionally starts off
>"higgledy-piggledy". It's *meant* to be goofy. Lighthearted. Silly, >even.
>I've been writing them for years.

Yup, I know;) but I sorta prefer cunningly-charmingly *teases*

> I even re-wrote the entire first book of "The Aenead" in double- dactyls :)

Someday you must send that to me. I have rewritten a few chapters of the OT based on ancient erotica *laughs* with a lot of license but that was about a decade and half and it is hand written.

Well Cato, this has been fun, too bad you are not near Nashville I would invite you to the Halloween Bash this weekend - we've an entire house rented and the children leave at 9pm and then the party truly begins.

Talk soon,

Vale

Julia


--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Cato" <catoinnyc@...> wrote:
>
> Cato Iuliae Aquilae omnibusque in Foro SPD
>
> Salvete!
>
> Just FYI, it's called a "double dactyl", and traditionally starts off "higgledy-piggledy". It's *meant* to be goofy. Lighthearted. Silly, even. I've been writing them for years.
>
> I even re-wrote the entire first book of "The Aenead" in double-dactyls :)
>
> Valete!
>
> Cato
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71123 From: Cn. Cornelius Lentulus Date: 2009-10-14
Subject: R: [Nova-Roma] I want to get involved but...
Cn. Lentulus Shantipolo sal.


Thank you for comment. I am very aware of the phenomenon, and I am glad when people like you share how they view NR from outside.

I take your comment to re-emphasize my suggestion and very firm opinion that our public, official and main forum should be restricted only for informative, useful, interesting and mostly promotional material, e.g. info about NR events, polite and educated debates about vital questions about NR ideology and Roman topics, promotion and introduction of Nova Roma, sharing how to live our Roman lives etc.

We would have to have another official mailing list for chatting convolutedly about everything and to fight internal political fights.

I said it a hundred times, I say it again, I think this forum is constantly abused and is entirely not used as a Roman Forum where public speech was restricted and tolerated only if in a very dignified way.

This mailing list, as it is currently, is absolutely not suitable for a main public forum of Nova Roma: it's a discussion and debate list.




--- Mer 14/10/09, shantipole2001 <mark@...> ha scritto:

Da: shantipole2001 <mark@...>
Oggetto: [Nova-Roma] I want to get involved but...
A: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Data: Mercoledì 14 ottobre 2009, 18:32

 

I have been following Nova Roma for years and love what it stands for. My background is in the law and international politics and I have always wanted to take that extra step and get involved with NR as I believe the idea that was Rome still has resonance today.

Unfortunately, whenever I check in to this list to see what is happening (which is getting less and less frequent)I always see the same thing, constant arguments that seem to descend into name calling with people quitting or threatening to quit and no real decorum and certainly very little real debate.

I am sure the majority of the members of NR want this organization to flourish. A lot has been accomplished and much more can be done to present the group as a legitimate social, historical, legal and even political organization that represents the ideals of what ancient Rome was built on. I am all for passionate debate and the art of rhetoric but I can only assume that I am not alone when I read some of the petty squabbling that goes on here and just shake my head and move on. And that does not bode well for building NR into an active, viable organization that can move beyond its virtual roots to something more concrete.

Anyhow that is my opinion as an outsider looking in. You can all take it for what it is worth. I invite all to respond to my concerns especially those of you who have been members for awhile and feel I am off base.

All the best!


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Poco spazio e tanto spam? Yahoo! Mail ti protegge dallo spam e ti da tanto spazio gratuito per i tuoi file e i messaggi
http://mail.yahoo.it
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71124 From: livia_plauta Date: 2009-10-14
Subject: Re: Ancient Roman Shade
Salve Julia,
maybe they should publicize the ghost instead of trying to chase it out. In other places in Rumania there are Dracula tours, and they can have a "ghost tour".

Vale,
Livia
>
>
> http://www.sott.net/articles/show/176522-Romania-Hotel-to-hire-medium-to\
> -deal-with-resident-ghost
> <http://www.sott.net/articles/show/176522-Romania-Hotel-to-hire-medium-t\
> o-deal-with-resident-ghost>
>
> Photo: http://www.flickr.com/photos/l_j_a/4010062926/
> <http://www.flickr.com/photos/l_j_a/4010062926/>
>
> A hotel in Romania recently became a site of interest for ghost hunters
> after a local photographed what appears to be a female spirit standing
> above its lobby stairwell. The hotel, named the Decebal, is situated in
> the mountain spa resort of Baile Herculane.
>
> Local, Victorian Loval aged 33 and her boyfriend snuck inside the hotel
> which has been closed for five years for renovations. While inside she
> snapped the photo, but only saw the ghost later, when she developed the
> film. The hotel is said to stand on an ancient Roman ruin and the ghost
> appears to be wearing the white robe of an ancient Roman priestess.
>
> Some have dismissed the photo as an illusion caused by irregular
> stonework in the lobby however others have been in the hotel since the
> event and swear that they saw the ghost. One group of students fled the
> building in fear after being confronted by the apparent spirit. Another
> man called a friend from inside the lobby in a panic after claiming to
> have seen its ghostly resident. Some have commented that she might be
> guarding something of ancient importance.
>
> Now it appears that the owner of the site is worried that this
> non-paying resident might be bad for business when the establishment
> re-opens. It is being reported in the Romanian press that the hotel
> management is planning to bring out a medium to make contact and ask the
> spirit why she remains and on what conditions she might 'check-out'.
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71125 From: livia_plauta Date: 2009-10-14
Subject: Re: Classic Poetry, Prose, Proems, Literature Excerpts
Salve Julia,
heard it before, but this time it was nice to read it in Latin. It turns out Pliny the youger is absolutely easy to read.

Vale,
Livia
>
> Salvete Omnes,
>
> I am preparing for a Halloween Bash in Nashville this weekend and part of that planning is to tell ghost stories. So I would like to share one of the Roman genre, most of you have probably heard this one before but a good story bears repeating:
>
>
>
> An Ancient Ghost Story by Pliny the Younger
>
> Erat Athenis spatiosa et magna domus, sed infamis et pestilens. Per silentium noctis sonus ferri et strepitus vinculorum procul, tum e proximo auditi sunt. Mox apparebat senex macie et squalore confectus, qui barbam magnam et capillos villosos habebat; pedibus et manibus catenas habebat.
>
> Inhabitantes domus(gen) noctes diras et non somnum habebant. Morbus et etiam mors ex timore veniebant. Deserta et damna casa in silentio remanebat. Titulum positum est, sed nemo casam desideravit. Venit Athenas philosophus Athenodorus. Legit titulum, et pretio audito, multa rogat. Omnia audit, sed tamen casam capit.
>
> In vespera, Athenodorus lumen, stilum, et pugillares in prima parte casae posuit; tum omnes servos dimittit. Animum, oculos, et manum cum pugillaribus occupat, quod vacua mens multos timores fingit.
>
> Primo silentium est. Tum vincula procul audiuntur. Philosophus oculos non movet; stilo scribit. Soni in casa, tum in camera sunt. Athenodorus spectat; figuram videt. Senex stat et digito vocat. Athenodorus stilum iterum capit. Vincula audiuntur super caput. Nunc philosophus lumen capit. Senex tarde ad ianuam ambulat, et Athenodorus etiam ambulat post senem. In area casae senex philosophum deserit. Desertus philosophus in loco herbas ponit.
>
> Postero die magistratum vocat et magistratus locum effodit. Ossa inserta in vinculis invenit, et, collecta, publice sepeliuntur. Numquam iterum senex videbatur.
>
> There was in Athens a house, spacious and open, but with an infamous reputation, as if filled with pestilence. For in the dead of night, a noise like the clashing of iron could be heard. And if one listened carefully, it sounded like the rattling of chains. At first the noise seemed to be at a distance, but then it would approach, nearer, nearer, nearer. Suddenly a phantom would appear, an old man, pale and emaciated, with a long beard, and hair that appeared driven by the wind. The fetters on his feet and hands rattled as he moved them.
> Any dwellers in the house passed sleepless nights under the most dismal terrors imaginable. The nights without rest led them to a kind of madness, and as the horrors in their minds increased, onto a path toward death. Even in the daytime--when the phantom did not appear--the memory of the nightmare was so strong that it still passed before their eyes. The terror remained when the cause of it was gone.
> Damned as uninhabitable, the house was at last deserted, left to the spectral monster. But in hope that some tenant might be found who was unaware of the malevolence within it, the house was posted for rent or sale.
> It happened that a philosopher named Athenodorus came to Athens at that time. Reading the posted bill, he discovered the dwelling's price. The extraordinary cheapness raised his suspicion, yet when he heard the whole story, he was not in the least put off. Indeed, he was eager to take the place. And did so immediately.
> As evening drew near, Athenodorus had a couch prepared for him in the front section of the house. He asked for a light and his writing materials, then dismissed his retainers. To keep his mind from being distracted by vain terrors of imaginary noises and apparitions, he directed all his energy toward his writing.
> For a time the night was silent. Then came the rattling of fetters. Athenodorus neither lifted up his eyes, nor laid down his pen. Instead he closed his ears by concentrating on his work. But the noise increased and advanced closer till it seemed to be at the door, and at last in the very chamber. Athenodorus looked round and saw the apparition exactly as it had been described to him. It stood before him, beckoning with one finger.
> Athenodorus made a sign with his hand that the visitor should wait a little, and bent over his work. The ghost, however, shook the chains over the philosopher's head, beckoning as before. Athenodorus now took up his lamp and followed. The ghost moved slowly, as if held back by his chains. Once it reached the courtyard, it suddenly vanished.
> Athenodorus, now deserted, carefully marked the spot with a handful of grass and leaves. The next day he asked the magistrate to have the spot dug up. There they found--intertwined with chains--the bones that were all that remained of a body that had long lain in the ground. Carefully, the skeletal relics were collected and given proper burial, at public expense. The tortured ancient was at rest. And the house in Athens was haunted no more.
>
> Valete optime,
>
> Julia
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71126 From: livia_plauta Date: 2009-10-14
Subject: To the tribunes
L. Livia Plauta tribunibus S.P.D.

It seems that the Senate is in session. Could one of you please post the Senate's agenda, and the expected date of voting?

This is part of the tribunes' duties, you know.

Optime valete,
Livia
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71127 From: shantipole2001 Date: 2009-10-14
Subject: Re: R: [Nova-Roma] I want to get involved but...
That is not a bad idea although civility should reign in private forum as well as in public.

I see the benefits of the organization as a whole though and NR has come a long way. I am excited by its potential and I appreciate the positive comment.

Like Rome, NR reflects a vast and often splintered population but the ideals that inspired the Romans of the past to greatness should certainly do the same for present and future Nova Romans. I will follow the group closely to determine where and if I fit in.

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Cn. Cornelius Lentulus" <cn_corn_lent@...> wrote:
>
> Cn. Lentulus Shantipolo sal.
>
>
> Thank you for comment. I am very aware of the phenomenon, and I am glad when people like you share how they view NR from outside.
>
> I take your comment to re-emphasize my suggestion and very firm opinion that our public, official and main forum should be restricted only for informative, useful, interesting and mostly promotional material, e.g. info about NR events, polite and educated debates about vital questions about NR ideology and Roman topics, promotion and introduction of Nova Roma, sharing how to live our Roman lives etc.
>
> We would have to have another official mailing list for chatting convolutedly about everything and to fight internal political fights.
>
> I said it a hundred times, I say it again, I think this forum is constantly abused and is entirely not used as a Roman Forum where public speech was restricted and tolerated only if in a very dignified way.
>
> This mailing list, as it is currently, is absolutely not suitable for a main public forum of Nova Roma: it's a discussion and debate list.
>
>
>
>
> --- Mer 14/10/09, shantipole2001 <mark@...> ha scritto:
>
> Da: shantipole2001 <mark@...>
> Oggetto: [Nova-Roma] I want to get involved but...
> A: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> Data: Mercoledì 14 ottobre 2009, 18:32
>
>
>
>
>
>
>  
>
>
>
>
>
> I have been following Nova Roma for years and love what it stands for. My background is in the law and international politics and I have always wanted to take that extra step and get involved with NR as I believe the idea that was Rome still has resonance today.
>
>
>
> Unfortunately, whenever I check in to this list to see what is happening (which is getting less and less frequent)I always see the same thing, constant arguments that seem to descend into name calling with people quitting or threatening to quit and no real decorum and certainly very little real debate.
>
>
>
> I am sure the majority of the members of NR want this organization to flourish. A lot has been accomplished and much more can be done to present the group as a legitimate social, historical, legal and even political organization that represents the ideals of what ancient Rome was built on. I am all for passionate debate and the art of rhetoric but I can only assume that I am not alone when I read some of the petty squabbling that goes on here and just shake my head and move on. And that does not bode well for building NR into an active, viable organization that can move beyond its virtual roots to something more concrete.
>
>
>
> Anyhow that is my opinion as an outsider looking in. You can all take it for what it is worth. I invite all to respond to my concerns especially those of you who have been members for awhile and feel I am off base.
>
>
>
> All the best!
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Poco spazio e tanto spam? Yahoo! Mail ti protegge dallo spam e ti da tanto spazio gratuito per i tuoi file e i messaggi
> http://mail.yahoo.it
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71128 From: Maxima Valeria Messallina Date: 2009-10-14
Subject: Re: R: [Nova-Roma] I want to get involved but...
<<--- On Wed, 10/14/09, Cn. Cornelius Lentulus <cn_corn_lent@...> wrote:

We would have to have another official mailing list for chatting convolutedly about everything and to fight internal political fights.>>
 
Didn't someone suggest we have a separate list for that and call it "The Arena"? I even posted about how we should adapt the rules of the ancient arena to that list.
Perhaps its time has come.
 
Maxima Valeria Messallina

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71129 From: Colin Brodd Date: 2009-10-14
Subject: Re: R: [Nova-Roma] I want to get involved but...
Gaius Tullius Valerianus Gnaeo Cornelio Lentulo atque Maximae Valeriae Messallinae S.P.D.

Ummm .. . don't we have that already? I mean, it's called the Back Alley, but the idea is the same . . . 

Curate ut valeatis!

On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 8:43 PM, Maxima Valeria Messallina <maximavaleriamessallina@...> wrote:
 

<<--- On Wed, 10/14/09, Cn. Cornelius Lentulus <cn_corn_lent@...> wrote:

We would have to have another official mailing list for chatting convolutedly about everything and to fight internal political fights.>>
 
Didn't someone suggest we have a separate list for that and call it "The Arena"? I even posted about how we should adapt the rules of the ancient arena to that list.
Perhaps its time has come.
 
Maxima Valeria Messallina

_

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71130 From: Cato Date: 2009-10-14
Subject: Re: R: [Nova-Roma] I want to get involved but...
Cato Shantipolo Cornelio Lentulusque SPD

Salvete.

I disagree. The ancient Forum, of which this List is the mirror, was not just a place for pretty speeches and polite Victorian-era-morality-level conversation. It was the living, breathing heart of the City, filled with people both polite and not-so-polite, having conversations about everything under the sun. Everything.

There were fistfights and murders and intrigue and political plotting and vendors and speeches and insults and praise and education and philosophizing and grandiose orations and everything else that comes with being in a vibrant urban culture at the center of the world.

Should we encourage harsh speech? No. Should we try to stop it? Not by legislation or baby-sitting. Human beings are different, and every one of us is peculiar, with a different understanding of the world and how to be Roman in it. Legislating morality is impossible, as human history has shown all too clearly.

So Iulia Aquila and I can throw barbs at each other without assuming that because we differ in approach we differ in goal. I respect her knowledge and, above all, her love of things Roman and her desire to see the Respublica flourish. I hope the feeling is mutual. But we can - and should - express ourselves in vivid, living language, because that is how you get to know one another where physical proximity is not possible.

There is a difference between meaningful disagreements of opinion and political posturing and personal attack, but the line is different for everyone, and assuming the lowest common denominator will only anger the more adult among us and do nothing to curb the more childish.

Valete,

Cato
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71131 From: rory12001 Date: 2009-10-15
Subject: Re: R: [Nova-Roma] I want to get involved but...
Salvete;
there are 2 Nova Romas - an RPG one which is about politics and constant fighting and the real life one, where people learn, live and share Roman culture. Most on this list want to live in the 2nd, and people are turned away by the 1st.
valete
Maior



-mutual. But we can - and should - express ourselves in vivid, living language, because that is how you get to know one another where physical proximity is not possible.
>
> There is a difference between meaningful disagreements of opinion and political posturing and personal attack, but the line is different for everyone, and assuming the lowest common denominator will only anger the more adult among us and do nothing to curb the more childish.
>
> Valete,
>
> Cato
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71132 From: Shoshana Hathaway Date: 2009-10-15
Subject: boods ae ...
Books are the portals through which I can travel to anywhere and everywhen;
I can experience the full panoply of human passion, glory, emotion and
experience: delve into any area of human endeavor, and learn to my capacity:
touch the unspeakable beauty of exquisitely verbalized thought: or
investigate the intricacies of minds whose shaping has been vastly different
from my own. With each book I read, I am made a little more than I was,
thus, for me, books are, ultimately the expanders of my mind and soul.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71133 From: rory12001 Date: 2009-10-15
Subject: Re: To the tribunes
Salve Livia;
I've written to the tribunes, reminding them and I know Vipsanius Agrippa,tribune and Senator, is present in the Senate, so someone should make a report.
vale
Maior

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "livia_plauta" <livia.plauta@...> wrote:
>
> L. Livia Plauta tribunibus S.P.D.
>
> It seems that the Senate is in session. Could one of you please post the Senate's agenda, and the expected date of voting?
>
> This is part of the tribunes' duties, you know.
>
> Optime valete,
> Livia
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71134 From: mcorvvs Date: 2009-10-15
Subject: Re: Ides ritual performed by Sacerdos Iovis M.Octavius Corvus
Salvete collega,

At Ides Octobribus I, M.Octavius Corvus on behalf of People of Nova Roma performed Ides ritual for IOM, using the pattern sent to me by PM M.Moravius Piscinus Horatianus.
Rite was performed before the altar of Iuppiter.
Sacrifice was: incense, libum, wine. My middle son assisted me. During the ritual there was a complete silencium. Righ after the sacrifice about 30 thrushes forming one line from left to right flew from the North toward me. I consider this like a clear good sign of my sacrifice accepted. The smoke from the cauldron went to the north direction. That also signify that sacrifice

Optime valete,

CORVVS
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71135 From: Cato Date: 2009-10-15
Subject: Id. Oct.
Cato omnibus in Foro SPD

Salvete omnes!

Hodiernus dies est Idibus Octobribus; haec dies nefastus publicus est.

"He received the name of Caesar on the fourth day before the Ides of
the month usually called October, which he later named Hercules, in
the consulship of Pudens and Pollio. He was called Germanicus on the
Ides of 'Hercules' in the consulship of Maximus and Orfitus." -
Historia Augusta, "Commodus" 13-14

The Ides of October are sacred to Iuppiter Optimus Maximus. Sacrifices made today at the temples would lead to feasting in the streets to which the public and the poor were all invited. The celebrations would consist of games, music, dance and much drinking of wine. Horse races were held today in special honor of Iuppiter, and in the two-horse chariot race on the Campus Martius the right side horse of the winning chariot was sacrificed to Mars. In a curious ceremony, a mock fight was staged over the head of the horse by the people of the Palatine (on the Subura) and those of the Esquiline (on the Sacra Via), with the winner hanging it on their respective tower.


"After this success the consul summoned an Assembly, and in the
presence of his fellow-soldiers pronounced a eulogy on Decius not only
for his former services but also for this crowning proof of his
soldierly qualities. In addition to the other military rewards he
presented him with a golden chaplet and a hundred oxen, and one white
one of especial beauty, the horns of which had been gilded. The men
who had been with him on the height were rewarded with a standing
order for double rations and also with one ox and two tunics apiece.
After the consul had made the presentation, the legionaries, amidst
loud cheers, placed on Decius' head an "obsidial " wreath of grass.
Another similar wreath was bestowed upon him by his own men. With
these decorations upon him he sacrificed the beautiful ox to Mars and
presented the hundred oxen which had been given him to the men who had
accompanied him on his expedition. The legionaries also contributed a
pound of meal and a pint of wine for each of them. During all these
proceedings enthusiastic cheering went on through the whole camp.
After the rout it had suffered at the hands of Valerius, the Samnite
army was determined to put its fortunes to the proof in a final
conflict, and a third battle was fought at Suessula. The whole
fighting strength of the nation was brought up. The alarming news was
sent in haste to Capua; from there horsemen galloped to the Roman camp
to beg for help from Valerius. He at once ordered an advance, and
leaving a strong force to protect the camp and the baggage, proceeded
by forced marches to Suessula. He selected a site for his camp not far
from the enemy, and very restricted in area, as with the exception of
the horses there were no baggage, animals, or camp-followers to be
provided for. The Samnite army, assuming that there would be no delay
in giving battle, formed their lines, and as no enemy advanced against
them they marched on towards the Roman camp prepared to assault it.
When they saw the soldiers on the rampart and learnt from the report
of the reconnoitring parties who had been sent in every direction that
the camp was of small dimensions, they concluded that only a weak
force of the enemy held it. The whole army began to clamour for the
fosse to be filled up and the rampart torn down that they might force
their way into the camp. If the generals had not checked the
impetuosity of their men, their recklessness would have terminated the
war. As it was, however, their huge numbers were exhausting their
supplies, and owing to their previous inaction at Suessula and the
delay in bringing on an action they were not far from absolute
scarcity. They determined, therefore, since, as they imagined, the
enemy was afraid to venture outside his camp, to send foraging parties
into the fields. Meantime they expected that as the Romans made no
movement and had brought only as much corn as they could carry with
the rest of their equipment on their shoulders, they, too, would soon
be in want of everything. When the consul saw the enemy scattered
through the fields and only a few left on outpost duty in front of the
camp, he addressed a few words of encouragement to his men and led
them out to storm the Samnite camp. They carried it at the first rush;
more of the enemy were killed in their tents than at the gates or on
the rampart. All the standards which were captured he ordered to be
collected together. Leaving two legions to hold the camp, he gave
strict orders that they were not to touch the booty till he returned.
He went forward with his men in open column and sent the cavalry to
round up the scattered Samnites, like so much game, and drive them
against his army. There was an immense slaughter, for they were too
much terrified to think under what standard to rally or whether to
make for their camp or flee further afield. Their fears drove them
into such a hasty flight that as many as 40,000 shields-far more than
the number of the slain-and military standards, including those
captured in the storming of the camp, to the number of 170 were
brought to the consul. He then returned to the Samnite camp and all
the booty there was given to the soldiers." - Livy, History of Rome 7.37


"Facilis descensus Averno est;
Noctes atque dies patet atri janua Ditis;
Sed revocate gradum, superasque evadere ad auras,
Hoc opus, hic labor est."
(It is easy to go down into Avernus (the mouth of Hades);
night and day, the gates of dark
Death stand wide; but to climb back again, to retrace one's steps to
the upper air, there's the work, the task.) - Vergil, The Aenead VI.26

"Publius Vergilius Maro, a native of Mantua, had parents of humble
origin, especially his father, who according to some was a potter,
although the general opinion is that he was at first the hired man of
a certain Magus, an attendant on the magistrates, later became his son
in law because of his dilligence, and greatly increased his little
property by buying up woodlands and raising bees. He was born in the
first consulship of Gnaeus Pompeius the Great and Marcus Licinius
Crasus, on the ides of October, in a district called Andes, not far
distant from Mantua. While he was in his mothers womb, she dreamt
that she gave birth to a laurel-branch, which on touching the earth
took root and grew at once to the size of a full grown tree, covered
with fruits and flowers of various kinds; and on the following day,
when she was on the way to a neighbouring part of the country with her
husband, she turned aside and gave birth to her child in a ditch
beside the road. They say that the infant did not cry at its birth,
and had such a gentle expression as even then to give assurance of an
unusually happy destiny. There was added another omen; for a poplar
branch, which, as was usual in that region on such occaisions, was at
once planted where birth occurred, grew so fast in a short time that
it equalled in size poplars planted long before. It was called from
him " Vergils Tree", and was besides worshipped with great veneration
by pregnant and newly delivered women, who made the paid vows beneath
it." - Aelius Donatus (probably from the work "On Famous Men" by
Suetonius), Life of Vergil and Commentary on the Sixth Eclogue 1-5

"Hae tibi erunt artes, pacisque imponere morem
Parcere subjectis et debellare superbos."
(This shall be thy work: to improve conditions of peace, to spare the
lowly, and to overthrow the proud) - Vergil, The Aeneid VI.852

On this day in 70 BC, the greatest Roman poet who ever lived was
born, Publius Vergilius Maro - Vergil. The poet's boyhood
experience of life on the farm was an essential part of his education.
After his studies in Rome, Vergil is believed to have lived with his
father for about 10 years, engaged in farm work, study, and writing
poetry. In 41 BC the farm was confiscated to provide land for
soldiers. Vergil went to Rome, where he became a part of the literary
circle patronized by Maecenas and Augustus and where his Eclogues, or
Bucolics, were completed in 37. In these poems he idealizes rural
life in the manner of his Greek predecessor Theocritus. From the
Eclogues, Vergil turned to rural poetry of a contrasting kind,
realistic and didactic. In his Georgics, completed in 30, he
seeks, as had the Greek Hesiod before him, to interpret the charm of
real life and work on the farm. His perfect poetic expression gives
him the first place among pastoral poets. For the rest of his life
Vergil worked on the Aeneid, a national epic honoring Rome and
foretelling prosperity to come. The adventures of Aeneas are
unquestionably one of the greatest long poems in world literature.
Vergil made Aeneas the paragon of the most revered Roman
virtues—devotion to family, loyalty to the state, and piety. In 12
books, Vergil tells how Aeneas escaped from Troy to Carthage, where he
became Dido's lover and related his adventures to her. At Iuppiter's
command, he left Carthage, went to Sicily, visited his father's shade
in Hades, and landed in Italy. There he established the beginnings of
the Roman state and waged successful war against the natives. The work
ends with the death of Turnus at the hands of Aeneas. The verse, in
dactylic hexameters, is strikingly regular, though Vergil's death left
the epic incomplete and some of the lines unfinished. The sonority of
the words and the nobility of purpose make the Aeneid a masterpiece.
Vergil is the dominant figure in all Latin literature. His influence
continued unabated through the Middle Ages, and many poets since Dante
have acknowledged their great debt to him. Minor poems ascribed to
Vergil are of doubtful authorship. The spelling "Virgil" is not found
earlier than the 5th cent. A.D.

The Aeneid is Vergil's masterpiece, a national epic that tells the
story of the heroic Aeneas and the founding of Rome. The long poem is
often compared to Homer's the Iliad and the Odyssey, Greek epics
combining history and mythology. Vergil died before finishing the
work, but it was published (tradition has it that he wanted it
destroyed after his death) and became a revered text for centuries. In
medieval Europe Vergil became an almost mystical personage, with magic
powers attributed to him and his work (he is used as the guide to Hell
in Dante's Inferno). The Renaissance revived scholarly study of the
Aeneid and Vergil is still considered the greatest of Roman poets.

"Amor vincit omnia, et nos cedamus amori."
(Love conquers all things, let us yield to love) - Vergil, Eclogues X.69

Valete bene!

Cato
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71136 From: Cato Date: 2009-10-15
Subject: Re: R: [Nova-Roma] I want to get involved but...
Cato Maiori sal.

Salve.

Were politics important to the ancient Romans? Was there ever political intrigue or fighting in ancient Rome?

Was the law important to the ancient Romans? Were there ever clashes about the law and its interpretation in ancient Rome?

Vale,

Cato



--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "rory12001" <rory12001@...> wrote:
>
> Salvete;
> there are 2 Nova Romas - an RPG one which is about politics and constant fighting and the real life one, where people learn, live and share Roman culture. Most on this list want to live in the 2nd, and people are turned away by the 1st.
> valete
> Maior
>
>
>
> -mutual. But we can - and should - express ourselves in vivid, living language, because that is how you get to know one another where physical proximity is not possible.
> >
> > There is a difference between meaningful disagreements of opinion and political posturing and personal attack, but the line is different for everyone, and assuming the lowest common denominator will only anger the more adult among us and do nothing to curb the more childish.
> >
> > Valete,
> >
> > Cato
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71137 From: David Kling Date: 2009-10-15
Subject: Re: R: [Nova-Roma] I want to get involved but...
Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus Catoni salutem dicit

The difference between the ancient Romans and us is that they had Rome.  We live in a diasporic relationship between us as a people and our holy city.  We do not have the grounding and centeredness that the ancient Romans had.  Until we "clot" as a people we are just a group of people who think "Rome is cool."  Not good enough.

Vale;

Modianus

On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 5:28 AM, Cato <catoinnyc@...> wrote:
 

Cato Maiori sal.

Salve.

Were politics important to the ancient Romans? Was there ever political intrigue or fighting in ancient Rome?

Was the law important to the ancient Romans? Were there ever clashes about the law and its interpretation in ancient Rome?

Vale,

Cato




Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71138 From: shantipole2001 Date: 2009-10-15
Subject: Re: R: [Nova-Roma] I want to get involved but...
I am not suggesting a censoring of open debate (although even the US Congress, Canadian and British parliaments and the UN maintain some form of respectful decorum in their forums) but perhaps ensuring that any publicly accessible forums and message boards be restricted to NR members only.

I definitely have some more ideas and I am being pulled closer to joining.

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Colin Brodd <magisterbrodd@...> wrote:
>
> Gaius Tullius Valerianus Gnaeo Cornelio Lentulo atque Maximae Valeriae
> Messallinae S.P.D.
> Ummm .. . don't we have that already? I mean, it's called the Back Alley,
> but the idea is the same . . .
>
> Curate ut valeatis!
>
> On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 8:43 PM, Maxima Valeria Messallina <
> maximavaleriamessallina@...> wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > <<--- On *Wed, 10/14/09, Cn. Cornelius Lentulus <cn_corn_lent@...>*wrote:
> >
> > We would have to have another official mailing list for chatting
> > convolutedly about everything and to fight internal political fights.>>
> >
> > Didn't someone suggest we have a separate list for that and call it "The
> > Arena"? I even posted about how we should adapt the rules of the ancient
> > arena to that list.
> > Perhaps its time has come.
> >
> > Maxima Valeria Messallina
> >
> > _
> >
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71139 From: shantipole2001 Date: 2009-10-15
Subject: participating in real-world politics as an international "culture an
Has anybody within NR with a solid understanding of Roman virtues thought of addressing some of the real world issues being discussed in the halls of the UN or EU?

A Nova Roman will rightfully argue that the vurtues that ancient Rome were built on still resonate in 2009. How would a Nova Roman view issues like global warming, terrorism, multi-lateral international relations, crime and punishment, etc. seen through the lens of Roman ideals?

How can Nova Romans participate at a local, national and global political level and how would their Nova Roman roots and beliefs color their approach to the political questions of the day?

Does Nova Roma have a position on any of these topical questions? How can Nova Roma attempt to apply their beliefs to the reality of today to show that it is a true living, breathing and relevant belief system?

Much in the same way that the Roman Catholic Church interprets today's events through their belief system, do Nova Romans as a group ever do the same thing?

These are all questions I personally find fascinating. I am just not sure if they are relevant to what is going on in NR today but the quote in my subject line is directly from the FAQ so I do hold out hope.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71140 From: Cato Date: 2009-10-15
Subject: Re: R: [Nova-Roma] I want to get involved but...
Cato Modiano sal.

Salve.

And I agree with you to a great extent - which is precisely why I feel a "common law" is important, not just "common interests". But if we try to pretend that people are not people, and do not act like normal people in a normal urban environment, we become role-players in an internet fantasy world.

Vale,

Cato

P.S. - did the ancient Romans refer to Rome as a "holy city"? A question, not a criticism. GEC



--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, David Kling <tau.athanasios@...> wrote:
>
> Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus Catoni salutem dicit
>
> The difference between the ancient Romans and us is that they had Rome. We
> live in a diasporic relationship between us as a people and our holy city.
> We do not have the grounding and centeredness that the ancient Romans had.
> Until we "clot" as a people we are just a group of people who think "Rome is
> cool." Not good enough.
>
> Vale;
>
> Modianus
>
> On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 5:28 AM, Cato <catoinnyc@...> wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > Cato Maiori sal.
> >
> > Salve.
> >
> > Were politics important to the ancient Romans? Was there ever political
> > intrigue or fighting in ancient Rome?
> >
> > Was the law important to the ancient Romans? Were there ever clashes about
> > the law and its interpretation in ancient Rome?
> >
> > Vale,
> >
> > Cato
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71141 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2009-10-15
Subject: Re: participating in real-world politics as an international "cultur
Salve Perigrine,

shantipole2001 <mark@...> writes:

> Has anybody within NR with a solid understanding of Roman virtues
> thought of addressing some of the real world issues being discussed
> in the halls of the UN or EU?

I'm pretty sure no member of NR has contemplated addressing the UN or
the EU. There have been times in the past when a NR Consul has
attempted to get the Senate to make a statement in support of a
current issue, but as far as I can recall the Senate has never agreed
to endorse such a statement.

> A Nova Roman will rightfully argue that the vurtues that ancient
> Rome were built on still resonate in 2009. How would a Nova Roman
> view issues like global warming, terrorism, multi-lateral
> international relations, crime and punishment, etc. seen through the
> lens of Roman ideals?

Come on over to the Sodalitas Virtutis mailing list, and we'll talk
about it. To join, send a blank e-mail message to
SodalitasVirtutis-subscribe@yahoogroups.com or join at the Yahoo web
page for the sodalitas, at
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/SodalitasVirtutis/


Vale,

CN-EQVIT-MARINVS
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71142 From: Cato Date: 2009-10-15
Subject: Re: participating in real-world politics as an international "cultur
Cato Shantipolo Equitio Marino omnibusque in Foro SPD

Salvete!

Actually, Marinus, might it not be of greater use to start discussing things like this here, in the Forum? Perhaps what is missing here is precisely those things that are often discussed away from here, the heart of the Respublica.

I mean, some things *seem* obvious, like terrorism (go in with massive power and destroy them utterly), but I'm curious to hear what, based on sources like Pliny, the Romans might have thought about global warming :)

Valete!

Cato

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Gnaeus Equitius Marinus <gawne@...> wrote:
>
> Salve Perigrine,
>
> shantipole2001 <mark@...> writes:
>
> > Has anybody within NR with a solid understanding of Roman virtues
> > thought of addressing some of the real world issues being discussed
> > in the halls of the UN or EU?
>
> I'm pretty sure no member of NR has contemplated addressing the UN or
> the EU. There have been times in the past when a NR Consul has
> attempted to get the Senate to make a statement in support of a
> current issue, but as far as I can recall the Senate has never agreed
> to endorse such a statement.
>
> > A Nova Roman will rightfully argue that the vurtues that ancient
> > Rome were built on still resonate in 2009. How would a Nova Roman
> > view issues like global warming, terrorism, multi-lateral
> > international relations, crime and punishment, etc. seen through the
> > lens of Roman ideals?
>
> Come on over to the Sodalitas Virtutis mailing list, and we'll talk
> about it. To join, send a blank e-mail message to
> SodalitasVirtutis-subscribe@yahoogroups.com or join at the Yahoo web
> page for the sodalitas, at
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/SodalitasVirtutis/
>
>
> Vale,
>
> CN-EQVIT-MARINVS
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71143 From: luciaiuliaaquila Date: 2009-10-15
Subject: Re: participating in real-world politics as an international "cultur
Iulia Marino Shantipolo Catoni omnibusque S.P.D.

Marinus: > I'm pretty sure no member of NR has contemplated addressing the UN or > the EU.

I am equally pretty sure that the UN or EU would not give much, if any, credence to a representative of NR at this time either. We have quite a long way to go before that could even be considered.

Cato: >[Â…]might it not be of greater use to start discussing things like this here, in the Forum? Perhaps what is missing here is precisely those things that are often discussed away from here, the heart of the Respublica. [Â…] but I'm curious to hear what, based on sources like >Pliny, the Romans might have thought about global warming :)

And that last sentence is the key: making it relevant to some aspect of ancient Rome. We are forum for "for Nova Roma, which is dedicated to the principles, philosophy and faith of ancient Rome. We discuss points of history, organizational matters, religious questions, the Latin language and literature, re-enactment and costuming, and much more." "Much more," is in the context of the many aspects of Ancient Rome.

Ancient Rome surely had to deal forms or ancient Terrorism from various sources – and also pollution and pollutants, however global warming was not an urgent issue then ;) We are not a general discussions group; our focus is and will remain on Ancient Rome. However as Marine has already pointed out we do have other mailing lists approved by Nova Roma – but in reality there is nothing from stopping you from starting your own group on current affairs/modern issues for Novi Romani – I would leave it to you Mark, to pitch it to Nova Roma for them to approve based on NR requirements. In my mind a true Roman would enter such an arena apart from Nova Roma possessing the very values of Roma in his heart – being a representative of those values no matter where he/she is.

Cura ut valeas,

Julia
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71144 From: David Kling Date: 2009-10-15
Subject: Re: R: [Nova-Roma] I want to get involved but...
Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus Catoni salutem dicit

*I* used the term holy city because we are in a diasporic relationship with Rome and Rome has an iconic factor to us as Nova Romans; therefore, the 'sacred' nature of the city itself -- personified in the form of the goddess Roma.

Nova Roma NEEDS to work on its culture.  Right now the culture is more so dysfunctional and that needs to change.

Vale;

Modianus

On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 9:08 AM, Cato <catoinnyc@...> wrote:
 

Cato Modiano sal.

Salve.

And I agree with you to a great extent - which is precisely why I feel a "common law" is important, not just "common interests". But if we try to pretend that people are not people, and do not act like normal people in a normal urban environment, we become role-players in an internet fantasy world.

Vale,

Cato

P.S. - did the ancient Romans refer to Rome as a "holy city"? A question, not a criticism. GEC




Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71145 From: David Kling Date: 2009-10-15
Subject: Re: participating in real-world politics as an international "cultur
Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus S.P.D.

As Nova Romans we SHOULD be looking at things through a "Roman" filter and developing our own culture and mores based not only on antiquity but our modern understanding of things based on our understanding of values (from antiquity but placed in the present).  I'd like to see the Collegium Pontificum address issues and concerns  -- develop our own "talmud" like depository of knowledge.

Vale;

Modianus

On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 9:49 AM, shantipole2001 <mark@...> wrote:
 

Has anybody within NR with a solid understanding of Roman virtues thought of addressing some of the real world issues being discussed in the halls of the UN or EU?

A Nova Roman will rightfully argue that the vurtues that ancient Rome were built on still resonate in 2009. How would a Nova Roman view issues like global warming, terrorism, multi-lateral international relations, crime and punishment, etc. seen through the lens of Roman ideals?

How can Nova Romans participate at a local, national and global political level and how would their Nova Roman roots and beliefs color their approach to the political questions of the day?

Does Nova Roma have a position on any of these topical questions? How can Nova Roma attempt to apply their beliefs to the reality of today to show that it is a true living, breathing and relevant belief system?

Much in the same way that the Roman Catholic Church interprets today's events through their belief system, do Nova Romans as a group ever do the same thing?

These are all questions I personally find fascinating. I am just not sure if they are relevant to what is going on in NR today but the quote in my subject line is directly from the FAQ so I do hold out hope.


Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71146 From: luciaiuliaaquila Date: 2009-10-15
Subject: Re: Ides ritual performed by Sacerdos Iovis M.Octavius Corvus
Salve Corvus,

Thank you for this. Exceptional sign! Bona Fortuna!

Optimé valé in cúrá deorum,

Julia



--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "mcorvvs" <mcorvvs@...> wrote:
>
> Salvete collega,
>
> At Ides Octobribus I, M.Octavius Corvus on behalf of People of Nova Roma performed Ides ritual for IOM, using the pattern sent to me by PM M.Moravius Piscinus Horatianus.
> Rite was performed before the altar of Iuppiter.
> Sacrifice was: incense, libum, wine. My middle son assisted me. During the ritual there was a complete silencium. Righ after the sacrifice about 30 thrushes forming one line from left to right flew from the North toward me. I consider this like a clear good sign of my sacrifice accepted. The smoke from the cauldron went to the north direction. That also signify that sacrifice
>
> Optime valete,
>
> CORVVS
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71147 From: luciaiuliaaquila Date: 2009-10-15
Subject: Re: Ancient Roman Shade
Salve Livia,
Livia: >maybe they should publicize the ghost instead of trying to chase it out. In
>other places in Rumania there are Dracula tours, and they can have a "ghost
>tour

Sabine told us the Hotel is in disrepair and closed so maybe a superstitious mindset came into play and the owner abandoned it. The article is from a year old. If he had publicized the shade then he might have a successful hotel today. I just finished looking over the photos; I want to go...badly... To reiterate what Sabine told us, it now known as the Hotel Decebal of Herculane and was "the former Franz Josef Hotel where the Emperor Franz Josef's wife, Elisabeth of Bavaria, well known as Sisi enjoyed the Hotel and spa."
Here are some more Photos:
http://www.panoramio.com/photo/24432899
http://www.flickr.com/photos/39370239@N03/page3/
I think I want to go live and die in Herculane. I'd live in the Hotel even.

Here's some more info:
The Hotel Decebal in Herculane has become a local attraction after a photograph of a ghost was published by newspapers and television.
The ghost of a tall woman in a long white dress reportedly watches the hallways and staircases of the Decebal hotel, in the Baile Herculane mountain spa. The 150-year-old hotel is believed to hide ancient Roman treasure under its foundations and the ghost is said by locals to keep treasure hunters away. The hotel has been closed for renovations for five years but people who have ventured inside claim to have seen - and photographed - the ghost. Victoria Iovan, 33, from Baile Herculane, said: "I photographed my boyfriend in the hotel. Back home I was shocked to see another woman's shadow in the picture. She looked like a priestess in long white clothes."
Another witness, a high school student called Alexandra, said he and six classmates went into the hotel late one evening for fun. "All of a sudden we felt a cold air and we saw a white silhouette close to us. We couldn't find our way out because we ran so fast," he said.
Local authorities have warned people not to go into the hotel because they say it is unsafe because of the building work.

I am a bit skeptical though and would need more than the one available photo. However, and I am surprised no one already mentioned this, if the area truly is haunted I am wondering if the "haunting" and the "bad luck" of the owner is due to improper burial or not paying reverence to the shade during Dies Parentales.
For discussion sake, let's say the shade exists and she is Roman, of the Religio. Then one would have to determine why it is in this state and why it stays at the location. Some research into the area to find out who she was, when she died, under what circumstances, what the shade's personal beliefs are etc.
If it truly is a guardian, a deified formerly alive being or a minor deity than there is no reason to go any further and the appropriate reverence should be paid – and possibly publicize it if there are auspicious signs.
If she was, for example, murdered because of religious persecution that is another matter entirely. If the shade is bound against its will then the shade should be assisted to complete its transition – maybe to the Blessed Isles to reside in the Garden of Venus. A proper funerary ritual performed by an adopted son might work.
At any rate a parentatio should be performed.
There is also an exorcism done to get rid of unhappy or evil spirits – the owner, head of household, or designee would walk barefoot through the dwelling throwing black beans over his shoulder repeating incantations x9 and those attending would clash pots while repeating more incantations x9.

I just think it is a cool story.

Vale,

Julia


--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "livia_plauta" <livia.plauta@...> wrote:
>
> Salve Julia,
> maybe they should publicize the ghost instead of trying to chase it out. In other places in Rumania there are Dracula tours, and they can have a "ghost tour".
>
> Vale,
> Livia
> >
> >
> > http://www.sott.net/articles/show/176522-Romania-Hotel-to-hire-medium-to\
> > -deal-with-resident-ghost
> > <http://www.sott.net/articles/show/176522-Romania-Hotel-to-hire-medium-t\
> > o-deal-with-resident-ghost>
> >
> > Photo: http://www.flickr.com/photos/l_j_a/4010062926/
> > <http://www.flickr.com/photos/l_j_a/4010062926/>
> >
> > A hotel in Romania recently became a site of interest for ghost hunters
> > after a local photographed what appears to be a female spirit standing
> > above its lobby stairwell. The hotel, named the Decebal, is situated in
> > the mountain spa resort of Baile Herculane.
> >
> > Local, Victorian Loval aged 33 and her boyfriend snuck inside the hotel
> > which has been closed for five years for renovations. While inside she
> > snapped the photo, but only saw the ghost later, when she developed the
> > film. The hotel is said to stand on an ancient Roman ruin and the ghost
> > appears to be wearing the white robe of an ancient Roman priestess.
> >
> > Some have dismissed the photo as an illusion caused by irregular
> > stonework in the lobby however others have been in the hotel since the
> > event and swear that they saw the ghost. One group of students fled the
> > building in fear after being confronted by the apparent spirit. Another
> > man called a friend from inside the lobby in a panic after claiming to
> > have seen its ghostly resident. Some have commented that she might be
> > guarding something of ancient importance.
> >
> > Now it appears that the owner of the site is worried that this
> > non-paying resident might be bad for business when the establishment
> > re-opens. It is being reported in the Romanian press that the hotel
> > management is planning to bring out a medium to make contact and ask the
> > spirit why she remains and on what conditions she might 'check-out'.
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71148 From: luciaiuliaaquila Date: 2009-10-15
Subject: Re: Classic Poetry, Prose, Proems, Literature Excerpts
Salve Livia,

I am glad you enjoyed it! Actually i saved the English version from one of our PM's postings.

Vale optime amica,

Julia

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "livia_plauta" <livia.plauta@...> wrote:
>
> Salve Julia,
> heard it before, but this time it was nice to read it in Latin. It turns out Pliny the youger is absolutely easy to read.
>
> Vale,
> Livia
> >
> > Salvete Omnes,
> >
> > I am preparing for a Halloween Bash in Nashville this weekend and part of that planning is to tell ghost stories. So I would like to share one of the Roman genre, most of you have probably heard this one before but a good story bears repeating:
> >
> >
> >
> > An Ancient Ghost Story by Pliny the Younger
> >
> > Erat Athenis spatiosa et magna domus, sed infamis et pestilens. Per silentium noctis sonus ferri et strepitus vinculorum procul, tum e proximo auditi sunt. Mox apparebat senex macie et squalore confectus, qui barbam magnam et capillos villosos habebat; pedibus et manibus catenas habebat.
> >
> > Inhabitantes domus(gen) noctes diras et non somnum habebant. Morbus et etiam mors ex timore veniebant. Deserta et damna casa in silentio remanebat. Titulum positum est, sed nemo casam desideravit. Venit Athenas philosophus Athenodorus. Legit titulum, et pretio audito, multa rogat. Omnia audit, sed tamen casam capit.
> >
> > In vespera, Athenodorus lumen, stilum, et pugillares in prima parte casae posuit; tum omnes servos dimittit. Animum, oculos, et manum cum pugillaribus occupat, quod vacua mens multos timores fingit.
> >
> > Primo silentium est. Tum vincula procul audiuntur. Philosophus oculos non movet; stilo scribit. Soni in casa, tum in camera sunt. Athenodorus spectat; figuram videt. Senex stat et digito vocat. Athenodorus stilum iterum capit. Vincula audiuntur super caput. Nunc philosophus lumen capit. Senex tarde ad ianuam ambulat, et Athenodorus etiam ambulat post senem. In area casae senex philosophum deserit. Desertus philosophus in loco herbas ponit.
> >
> > Postero die magistratum vocat et magistratus locum effodit. Ossa inserta in vinculis invenit, et, collecta, publice sepeliuntur. Numquam iterum senex videbatur.
> >
> > There was in Athens a house, spacious and open, but with an infamous reputation, as if filled with pestilence. For in the dead of night, a noise like the clashing of iron could be heard. And if one listened carefully, it sounded like the rattling of chains. At first the noise seemed to be at a distance, but then it would approach, nearer, nearer, nearer. Suddenly a phantom would appear, an old man, pale and emaciated, with a long beard, and hair that appeared driven by the wind. The fetters on his feet and hands rattled as he moved them.
> > Any dwellers in the house passed sleepless nights under the most dismal terrors imaginable. The nights without rest led them to a kind of madness, and as the horrors in their minds increased, onto a path toward death. Even in the daytime--when the phantom did not appear--the memory of the nightmare was so strong that it still passed before their eyes. The terror remained when the cause of it was gone.
> > Damned as uninhabitable, the house was at last deserted, left to the spectral monster. But in hope that some tenant might be found who was unaware of the malevolence within it, the house was posted for rent or sale.
> > It happened that a philosopher named Athenodorus came to Athens at that time. Reading the posted bill, he discovered the dwelling's price. The extraordinary cheapness raised his suspicion, yet when he heard the whole story, he was not in the least put off. Indeed, he was eager to take the place. And did so immediately.
> > As evening drew near, Athenodorus had a couch prepared for him in the front section of the house. He asked for a light and his writing materials, then dismissed his retainers. To keep his mind from being distracted by vain terrors of imaginary noises and apparitions, he directed all his energy toward his writing.
> > For a time the night was silent. Then came the rattling of fetters. Athenodorus neither lifted up his eyes, nor laid down his pen. Instead he closed his ears by concentrating on his work. But the noise increased and advanced closer till it seemed to be at the door, and at last in the very chamber. Athenodorus looked round and saw the apparition exactly as it had been described to him. It stood before him, beckoning with one finger.
> > Athenodorus made a sign with his hand that the visitor should wait a little, and bent over his work. The ghost, however, shook the chains over the philosopher's head, beckoning as before. Athenodorus now took up his lamp and followed. The ghost moved slowly, as if held back by his chains. Once it reached the courtyard, it suddenly vanished.
> > Athenodorus, now deserted, carefully marked the spot with a handful of grass and leaves. The next day he asked the magistrate to have the spot dug up. There they found--intertwined with chains--the bones that were all that remained of a body that had long lain in the ground. Carefully, the skeletal relics were collected and given proper burial, at public expense. The tortured ancient was at rest. And the house in Athens was haunted no more.
> >
> > Valete optime,
> >
> > Julia
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71149 From: luciaiuliaaquila Date: 2009-10-15
Subject: Re: Classic Poetry, Prose, Proems, Literature Excerpts
Salvete omnes,

I offer a short quote tonight:

Nam si violandum est jus, regnandi gratia
Violandum est: aliis rebus pietatem colas.

Be just, unless a kingdom tempts to break the laws,
For sovereign power alone can justify the cause.

A quote of Euripedes that Cicero states Caesar quoted often;from
"The Life of Julius Caesar" by Suetonius

Valete,

Julia

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "livia_plauta" <livia.plauta@...> wrote:
>
> Salve Julia,
> heard it before, but this time it was nice to read it in Latin. It turns out Pliny the youger is absolutely easy to read.
>
> Vale,
> Livia
> >
> > Salvete Omnes,
> >
> > I am preparing for a Halloween Bash in Nashville this weekend and part of that planning is to tell ghost stories. So I would like to share one of the Roman genre, most of you have probably heard this one before but a good story bears repeating:
> >
> >
> >
> > An Ancient Ghost Story by Pliny the Younger
> >
> > Erat Athenis spatiosa et magna domus, sed infamis et pestilens. Per silentium noctis sonus ferri et strepitus vinculorum procul, tum e proximo auditi sunt. Mox apparebat senex macie et squalore confectus, qui barbam magnam et capillos villosos habebat; pedibus et manibus catenas habebat.
> >
> > Inhabitantes domus(gen) noctes diras et non somnum habebant. Morbus et etiam mors ex timore veniebant. Deserta et damna casa in silentio remanebat. Titulum positum est, sed nemo casam desideravit. Venit Athenas philosophus Athenodorus. Legit titulum, et pretio audito, multa rogat. Omnia audit, sed tamen casam capit.
> >
> > In vespera, Athenodorus lumen, stilum, et pugillares in prima parte casae posuit; tum omnes servos dimittit. Animum, oculos, et manum cum pugillaribus occupat, quod vacua mens multos timores fingit.
> >
> > Primo silentium est. Tum vincula procul audiuntur. Philosophus oculos non movet; stilo scribit. Soni in casa, tum in camera sunt. Athenodorus spectat; figuram videt. Senex stat et digito vocat. Athenodorus stilum iterum capit. Vincula audiuntur super caput. Nunc philosophus lumen capit. Senex tarde ad ianuam ambulat, et Athenodorus etiam ambulat post senem. In area casae senex philosophum deserit. Desertus philosophus in loco herbas ponit.
> >
> > Postero die magistratum vocat et magistratus locum effodit. Ossa inserta in vinculis invenit, et, collecta, publice sepeliuntur. Numquam iterum senex videbatur.
> >
> > There was in Athens a house, spacious and open, but with an infamous reputation, as if filled with pestilence. For in the dead of night, a noise like the clashing of iron could be heard. And if one listened carefully, it sounded like the rattling of chains. At first the noise seemed to be at a distance, but then it would approach, nearer, nearer, nearer. Suddenly a phantom would appear, an old man, pale and emaciated, with a long beard, and hair that appeared driven by the wind. The fetters on his feet and hands rattled as he moved them.
> > Any dwellers in the house passed sleepless nights under the most dismal terrors imaginable. The nights without rest led them to a kind of madness, and as the horrors in their minds increased, onto a path toward death. Even in the daytime--when the phantom did not appear--the memory of the nightmare was so strong that it still passed before their eyes. The terror remained when the cause of it was gone.
> > Damned as uninhabitable, the house was at last deserted, left to the spectral monster. But in hope that some tenant might be found who was unaware of the malevolence within it, the house was posted for rent or sale.
> > It happened that a philosopher named Athenodorus came to Athens at that time. Reading the posted bill, he discovered the dwelling's price. The extraordinary cheapness raised his suspicion, yet when he heard the whole story, he was not in the least put off. Indeed, he was eager to take the place. And did so immediately.
> > As evening drew near, Athenodorus had a couch prepared for him in the front section of the house. He asked for a light and his writing materials, then dismissed his retainers. To keep his mind from being distracted by vain terrors of imaginary noises and apparitions, he directed all his energy toward his writing.
> > For a time the night was silent. Then came the rattling of fetters. Athenodorus neither lifted up his eyes, nor laid down his pen. Instead he closed his ears by concentrating on his work. But the noise increased and advanced closer till it seemed to be at the door, and at last in the very chamber. Athenodorus looked round and saw the apparition exactly as it had been described to him. It stood before him, beckoning with one finger.
> > Athenodorus made a sign with his hand that the visitor should wait a little, and bent over his work. The ghost, however, shook the chains over the philosopher's head, beckoning as before. Athenodorus now took up his lamp and followed. The ghost moved slowly, as if held back by his chains. Once it reached the courtyard, it suddenly vanished.
> > Athenodorus, now deserted, carefully marked the spot with a handful of grass and leaves. The next day he asked the magistrate to have the spot dug up. There they found--intertwined with chains--the bones that were all that remained of a body that had long lain in the ground. Carefully, the skeletal relics were collected and given proper burial, at public expense. The tortured ancient was at rest. And the house in Athens was haunted no more.
> >
> > Valete optime,
> >
> > Julia
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71150 From: luciaiuliaaquila Date: 2009-10-16
Subject: Re: R: [Nova-Roma] I want to get involved but...
Iulia Shantipolo omnibusque S.P.D.

Welcome to Nova Roma:) Your opinion is important as you are part of the tapestry that makes up our Res Publica. As Lentulus said:" I am glad when people like you share how they view NR from outside."

Way too often new members get lost in the flurry of posts and personalities. Please don't hesitate to ask if you have questions.

Shantipole: >"I am all for passionate
>debate and the art of rhetoric but I can only assume that I am not alone when I
>read some of the petty squabbling that goes on here and just shake my head and
>move on."

Good idea. There are many wonderful gems amongst the different threads, either do a search or sift back through the older threads yourself.
If you do not see something that interests you please, by all means, feel free to begin a topic yourself or simply ask a question.
I do not have the ML delivered to my inbox in its entirety; I prefer to read it online – I only get a few emails specific to my moderation duties. You can change your settings if this is easier for you.

What Maior says is so true: "Nova Roma can be so great when you share the vision and live your Romanitas; the values of Ancient Rome. It has immeasurably enriched my life since that very first day and given me my closest friends."

As you may have observed each individual has their own perception of how to live their Romanitas; some are more alike than different and some vary widely.

Cato: > "So Iulia Aquila and I can throw barbs at each other without assuming that
because we differ in approach we differ in goal. I respect her knowledge and,
above all, her love of things Roman and her desire to see the Respublica
flourish. I hope the feeling is mutual."

It was not a personal debate; and it was debate, not an argument. Our politics are different but we both hold Roma close to our hearts and both deeply desire that the Res Publica flourish and succeed. Limits were pushed just far enough so the issues would not dissolve and with a recognition or realization that all that could be, or should be, said about the issue had occurred it was then brought to a humorous denouement (although I think mine was funnier :>); without intercession from the Praetores.
There was no anger or ill will involved, on my part I can say for certain.
I come from a culture where I have seen professionals fight in court, debate in political and academic arenas yet when the issue is exhausted or a time out/recess called, friendly conversations ensue and friendships are rekindled. This was also an art in ancient Rome – of course bitter rivalries sometimes morphed into close friendships if they didn't kill each other or poison each other first *laughs.*

Nothing, absolutely nothing, stops any citizen, potential citizen or guest from writing to the Praetors or moderators with a concern of complaint. Many times Praetors and moderators do step in when things get out of hand and even before that a discussion or two may ensue between the moderation staff because of such issues as right of speech, of expression. It is a judgment call.

MVM: Didn't someone suggest we have a separate list for that and call it "The Arena"? I even posted about how we should adapt the rules of the ancient arena to that list. Perhaps its time has come.

Good Idea. *laughs* For as long as I can remember every time I see some of the more fervent and disturbing arguments that digress into personal attacks and name-calling I have entertained the idea that we should have a ML called "The Coliseum" and let opponents debate, argue and verbally spar to their hearts content.

Aganin welcome, glad to have you with us~

Valé optimé,

Julia







--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, David Kling <tau.athanasios@...> wrote:
>
> Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus Catoni salutem dicit
>
> *I* used the term holy city because we are in a diasporic relationship with
> Rome and Rome has an iconic factor to us as Nova Romans; therefore, the
> 'sacred' nature of the city itself -- personified in the form of the goddess
> Roma.
>
> Nova Roma NEEDS to work on its culture. Right now the culture is more so
> dysfunctional and that needs to change.
>
> Vale;
>
> Modianus
>
> On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 9:08 AM, Cato <catoinnyc@...> wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > Cato Modiano sal.
> >
> > Salve.
> >
> > And I agree with you to a great extent - which is precisely why I feel a
> > "common law" is important, not just "common interests". But if we try to
> > pretend that people are not people, and do not act like normal people in a
> > normal urban environment, we become role-players in an internet fantasy
> > world.
> >
> > Vale,
> >
> > Cato
> >
> > P.S. - did the ancient Romans refer to Rome as a "holy city"? A question,
> > not a criticism. GEC
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71151 From: rory12001 Date: 2009-10-16
Subject: Re: R: [Nova-Roma] I want to get involved but...
M. Hortensia Iuiae Modiane Shantipolonique spd;

I've been enjoying and thinking about this thread; about how we can further our common culture. This is a topic I've discussed with Cordus, Agricola and Saturninus many times.

One of the best ways to address new issues: ecology etc from a Roman pov. is to steep ourselves in the Roman mindset. Some who are/were classics majors in university are already there, but for the rest of us I was thinking of the common Roman teaching device of "exempla" [models]

Valerius Maximus wrote an entire book about Roman values & it has been translated "Memorable Deeds and Sayings." I have it from the library. There is also Quintillian and Pliny.

I was wondering if our Latinists here could post a theme from one of the above sources in Latin, we could translate it and discuss it.
optime vale
M.Hortensia Maior


--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "luciaiuliaaquila" <dis_pensible@...> wrote:
>
> Iulia Shantipolo omnibusque S.P.D.
>
> Welcome to Nova Roma:) Your opinion is important as you are part of the tapestry that makes up our Res Publica. As Lentulus said:" I am glad when people like you share how they view NR from outside."
>
> Way too often new members get lost in the flurry of posts and personalities. Please don't hesitate to ask if you have questions.
>
> Shantipole: >"I am all for passionate
> >debate and the art of rhetoric but I can only assume that I am not alone when I
> >read some of the petty squabbling that goes on here and just shake my head and
> >move on."
>
> Good idea. There are many wonderful gems amongst the different threads, either do a search or sift back through the older threads yourself.
> If you do not see something that interests you please, by all means, feel free to begin a topic yourself or simply ask a question.
> I do not have the ML delivered to my inbox in its entirety; I prefer to read it online – I only get a few emails specific to my moderation duties. You can change your settings if this is easier for you.
>
> What Maior says is so true: "Nova Roma can be so great when you share the vision and live your Romanitas; the values of Ancient Rome. It has immeasurably enriched my life since that very first day and given me my closest friends."
>
> As you may have observed each individual has their own perception of how to live their Romanitas; some are more alike than different and some vary widely.
>
> Cato: > "So Iulia Aquila and I can throw barbs at each other without assuming that
> because we differ in approach we differ in goal. I respect her knowledge and,
> above all, her love of things Roman and her desire to see the Respublica
> flourish. I hope the feeling is mutual."
>
> It was not a personal debate; and it was debate, not an argument. Our politics are different but we both hold Roma close to our hearts and both deeply desire that the Res Publica flourish and succeed. Limits were pushed just far enough so the issues would not dissolve and with a recognition or realization that all that could be, or should be, said about the issue had occurred it was then brought to a humorous denouement (although I think mine was funnier :>); without intercession from the Praetores.
> There was no anger or ill will involved, on my part I can say for certain.
> I come from a culture where I have seen professionals fight in court, debate in political and academic arenas yet when the issue is exhausted or a time out/recess called, friendly conversations ensue and friendships are rekindled. This was also an art in ancient Rome – of course bitter rivalries sometimes morphed into close friendships if they didn't kill each other or poison each other first *laughs.*
>
> Nothing, absolutely nothing, stops any citizen, potential citizen or guest from writing to the Praetors or moderators with a concern of complaint. Many times Praetors and moderators do step in when things get out of hand and even before that a discussion or two may ensue between the moderation staff because of such issues as right of speech, of expression. It is a judgment call.
>
> MVM: Didn't someone suggest we have a separate list for that and call it "The Arena"? I even posted about how we should adapt the rules of the ancient arena to that list. Perhaps its time has come.
>
> Good Idea. *laughs* For as long as I can remember every time I see some of the more fervent and disturbing arguments that digress into personal attacks and name-calling I have entertained the idea that we should have a ML called "The Coliseum" and let opponents debate, argue and verbally spar to their hearts content.
>
> Aganin welcome, glad to have you with us~
>
> Valé optimé,
>
> Julia
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, David Kling <tau.athanasios@> wrote:
> >
> > Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus Catoni salutem dicit
> >
> > *I* used the term holy city because we are in a diasporic relationship with
> > Rome and Rome has an iconic factor to us as Nova Romans; therefore, the
> > 'sacred' nature of the city itself -- personified in the form of the goddess
> > Roma.
> >
> > Nova Roma NEEDS to work on its culture. Right now the culture is more so
> > dysfunctional and that needs to change.
> >
> > Vale;
> >
> > Modianus
> >
> > On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 9:08 AM, Cato <catoinnyc@> wrote:
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > Cato Modiano sal.
> > >
> > > Salve.
> > >
> > > And I agree with you to a great extent - which is precisely why I feel a
> > > "common law" is important, not just "common interests". But if we try to
> > > pretend that people are not people, and do not act like normal people in a
> > > normal urban environment, we become role-players in an internet fantasy
> > > world.
> > >
> > > Vale,
> > >
> > > Cato
> > >
> > > P.S. - did the ancient Romans refer to Rome as a "holy city"? A question,
> > > not a criticism. GEC
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71152 From: Timothy or Stephen Gallagher Date: 2009-10-16
Subject: The Latin Phrase of the Day
Salvete
 
 
Mvlti svnt vocati, pavci vero electi - Many are called [but] few are chosen
 
 
Valete
 
Ti. Galerius Paulinus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71153 From: Cato Date: 2009-10-16
Subject: a.d. XVIII Kal. Nov.
Cato omnibus in Foro SPD

Salvete omnes!

Hodie est ante diem XVII Kalendas Novembris; hic dies fastus aterque est.

"The success which attended these operations made the people of
Falerii anxious to convert their forty years' truce into a permanent
treaty of peace with Rome. It also led the Latins to abandon their
designs against Rome and employ the force they had collected against
the Paelignians. The fame of these victories was not confined to the
limits of Italy; even the Carthaginians sent a deputation to
congratulate the senate and to present a golden crown which was to be
placed in the chapel of Jupiter on the Capitol. It weighed twenty-five
pounds. Both the consuls celebrated a triumph over the Samnites. A
striking figure in the procession was Decius, wearing his decorations;
in their extempore effusions the soldiers repeated his name as often
as that of the consul. Soon after this an audience was granted to
deputations from Capua and from Suessa, and at their request it was
arranged that a force should be sent to winter in those two cities to
act as a check upon the Samnites. Even in those days a residence in
Capua was by no means conducive to military discipline; having
pleasures of every kind at their command, the troops became enervated
and their patriotism was undermined. They began to hatch plans for
seizing Capua by the same criminal means by which its present holders
had taken it from its ancient possessors. "They richly deserved," it
was said, "to have the precedent which they had set turned against
themselves. Why should people like the Campanians who were incapable
of defending either their possessions or themselves enjoy the most
fertile territory in Italy, and a city well worthy of its territory,
in preference to a victorious army who had driven off the Samnites
from it by their sweat and blood? Was it just that these people who
had surrendered themselves into their power should be enjoying that
fertile and delightful country while they, wearied with warfare, were
struggling with the arid and pestilential soil round the City, or
suffering the ruinous consequences of an ever-growing interest which
were awaiting them in Rome?" This agitation which was being conducted
in secret, only a few being yet taken into the conspirators'
confidence, was discovered by the new consul, Caius Marcius Rutilus,
to whom Campania had been allotted as his province, his colleague, Q.
Servilius, being left in the City. Taught by years and experience-he
had been four times consul as well as Dictator and censor-he thought
his best course would be, after he was in possession of the facts as
ascertained through the tribunes, to frustrate any chance of the
soldiers carrying out their design by encouraging them in the hope of
executing it whenever they pleased. The troops had been distributed
amongst the cities of Campania, and the contemplated plan had been
propagated from Capua throughout the entire force. The consul caused a
rumour, therefore, to be spread that they were to occupy the same
winter quarters the following year. As there appeared to be no
necessity for their carrying out their design immediately, the
agitation quieted down for the present." Livy, History of Rome 7.38


"The two-shap'd Ericthonius had his birth
(Without a mother) from the teeming Earth;
Minerva nurs'd him, and the infant laid
Within a chest, of twining osiers made.
The daughters of king Cecrops undertook
To guard the chest, commanded not to look
On what was hid within. I stood to see
The charge obey'd, perch'd on a neighb'ring tree.
The sisters Pandrosos and Herse keep
The strict command; Aglauros needs would peep,
And saw the monstrous infant, in a fright,
And call'd her sisters to the hideous sight:
A boy's soft shape did to the waste prevail,
But the boy ended in a dragon's tail." - Ovid, "Metamorphoses"

In ancient Greece, today was celebrated in honor of Pandrosos.
Pandrosos was the daughter of Cecrops of Athens and the first
priestess of Athene; she was honored together with Athene in the
Pandroseion, on the Acropolis of Athens. According to Apollodorus,
Hephaestus attempted to rape Athena but was unsuccessful. His semen
fell on the ground, impregnating Gaia, who gave birth to Erichthonius,
the future king of Athens. Gaia didn't want the infant, so she gave it
to Athena. Athena in turn gave the baby in a small box to three
sisters, Herse, Pandrosus, and Aglaulus, warning them to never open
it. Aglaulus and Herse opened the box despite these instructions, went
insane at the sight, and threw themselves off the Acropolis. An
alternative version of the same story is that, while Athena was away
from Athens, bringing a mountain from Pallena to use in the Acropolis,
the sisters, minus Pandrosus again, opened the box. A crow witnessed
the opening and flew away to tell Athena, who fell into a rage and
dropped the mountain (now Mt. Lykabettos). As in the first version,
Herse and Aglaulus went insane and threw themselves off a cliff to
their deaths. Pandrosos, who had obeyed the rules, was made the
first priestess of Athene. Athena then secretly looked after
Erichthonius in her sanctuary while he grew up, and eventually he
became the next King of Athens. Pandrosus and Hermes later had a son,
Ceryx.

The three sisters, Pandrosos, Herse, and Auglaros were called the
Augralids, after their mother Augraulos. Pandrosos was the first to
spin, while Herse was concerned mainly with the olive tree, and
Agraulos and Aglauros protected mortals. They were never entirely
excised from Athens. The old temple on the Acropolis was dedicated to
Pandrosos, and was always considered more sacred than Athena's. The
city's sacred olive tree grew in it, and the tree was cared for by the
women of the Hersephoria. The entire Acropolis was originally theirs,
with statues of the three sisters in the main temple. Herse and
Pandrosos' were removed, although Aglauros' was maintained and
renamed. Before going into battle, Athenian soldiers dedicated
themselves to Agraulos, insuring that they had her protection and that
she would grant them rebirth. Each sacred procession included three
priestesses, two to scatter dew, and one with a branch tied to her
elbow, perhaps on the same principle as carrying the caduceus.

Valete bene!

Cato
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71154 From: M.C.C. Date: 2009-10-16
Subject: MEMENTO: TO ALL PROVINCIAL GOVERNORS
M. Curiatius Complutensis Senior Consul all provincial governors SPD
 
Ex officio consularis:
 
All governors are reminded that the annual report is due to the Senate until 1st of November 2762 a.U.c (AD 2009).
 

Legislation:

 

I want to please each governor to indicate wheather or not he wish to be prorogued by the Senate for another term of office for 2762 a.U.c (AD 2009).
 

Governors can send their reports using one of the following options:

  • directly to Nova Roman Senate or,
  • to consul M. Curiatius Complutensis.
 
Given under my hand this 1st day of October 2762 a.U.c (AD 2009), in the consulship of M. Curiatius Complutensis and M. Iulius Severus.

M·CVRIATIVS·COMPLVTENSIS
CONSVL NOVAE ROMAE
CONSVL HISPANIAE

NOVA ROMA

-------------------------------------------

ex paucis multa, ex minimis maxima
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71155 From: M.C.C. Date: 2009-10-16
Subject: SECOND CALL FOR CANDIDATES
I hereby call for candidates to stand for election to the ordinary
magistracies of the Comitia Centuriata and the Comitia Populi Tributa.

Anyone wishing to serve in any of these positions must have been a
citizen for at least six months by Kal. Ian. MMDCCLXIII (January 1st,
2010) and be an assiduus (tax-paying) citizen.

I will convene the comitia for the elections at a later time in
November, but candidates are welcome to announce themselves and begin
campaigning if they wish.

All potential candidates must contact me with their intention to stand
for office directly by sending a message to curiatius-complutensis at
yahoo dot es in order to be placed on the ballot. Please include the
word "candidate" in the subject of the message, and be sure to tell me
your full Nova Roman name and the office for which you will campaign.
Simply announcing your candidacy to one of the lists shall not be
accepted. You must write to me directly.

Candidacies will be accepted until 3 November 2009 (18.00 hrs CET Rome;
12.00 hrs EST Philadelphia).

The contio is tentatively scheduled to begin on 9 November, with the
elections to follow tentatively beginning on 15 November.

On behalf of the Res Publica Libera Senatus Populique Novae Romae I,
Marcus Curiatius Complutensis, Senior Consul, hereby issue this call for
candidates for the following offices:

I CENSOR: Must be at least 27 years old as of Kal. Ian. 2763 (January
1st, 2010). Must already have served at least six months as a consul,
praetor, aedilis, quaestor, tribunus plebis, magister aranearius
(formerly curator araneae), editor commentariorum (formerly curator
differum), rogator, or provincial governor. Must be assiduus.

II CONSULS: Must be at least 27 years old as of Kal. Ian. 2763 (January
1st, 2010). Must already have served at least six months as a consul,
praetor, aedilis, quaestor, tribunus plebis, magister aranearius
(formerly curator araneae), editor commentariorum (formerly curator
differum), rogator, or provincial governor. Must be assiduus.

II PRAETORS: Must be at least 25 years old as of Kal. Ian. 2763 (January
1st, 2010). Must already have served at least six months as a consul,
praetor, aedilis, quaestor, tribunus plebis, magister aranearius
(formerly curator araneae), editor commentariorum (formerly curator
differum), rogator, or provincial governor. Must be assiduus.

II CURULE AEDILES: Must be at least 21 years old as of Kal. Ian. 2763
(January 1st, 2010). Must be assiduus.

VIII QUAESTORES: Must be at least 21 years old as of Kal. Ian. 2763
(January 1st, 2010). Must be assiduus.

II ROGATORES: Must be at least 21 years old as of Kal. Ian. 2763
(January 1st, 2010). Must be assiduus.

IV DIRIBITORES: Must be at least 21 years old as of Kal. Ian. 2763
(January 1st, 2010). Must be assiduus.

II CUSTODES: Must be at least 21 years old as of Kal. Ian. 2763 (January
1st, 2010). Must be assiduus.

Datum sub manu mea ante diem XVI Kal. Nov. M. Curiatio Complutensis M.
Iulio Severo consulibus, in anno AUC MMDCCLXII.


M·CVRIATIVS·COMPLVTENSIS
CONSVL NOVAE ROMAE
CONSVL HISPANIAE

NOVA ROMA

-------------------------------------------

ex paucis multa, ex minimis maxima
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71156 From: shantipole2001 Date: 2009-10-16
Subject: Re: R: [Nova-Roma] I want to get involved but...
Thank you all for your warm welcome and heartfelt thoughts on this. It has been a wonderful experience and has encouraged me to pursue this farther.

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "shantipole2001" <mark@...> wrote:
>
> I am not suggesting a censoring of open debate (although even the US Congress, Canadian and British parliaments and the UN maintain some form of respectful decorum in their forums) but perhaps ensuring that any publicly accessible forums and message boards be restricted to NR members only.
>
> I definitely have some more ideas and I am being pulled closer to joining.
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Colin Brodd <magisterbrodd@> wrote:
> >
> > Gaius Tullius Valerianus Gnaeo Cornelio Lentulo atque Maximae Valeriae
> > Messallinae S.P.D.
> > Ummm .. . don't we have that already? I mean, it's called the Back Alley,
> > but the idea is the same . . .
> >
> > Curate ut valeatis!
> >
> > On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 8:43 PM, Maxima Valeria Messallina <
> > maximavaleriamessallina@> wrote:
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > <<--- On *Wed, 10/14/09, Cn. Cornelius Lentulus <cn_corn_lent@>*wrote:
> > >
> > > We would have to have another official mailing list for chatting
> > > convolutedly about everything and to fight internal political fights.>>
> > >
> > > Didn't someone suggest we have a separate list for that and call it "The
> > > Arena"? I even posted about how we should adapt the rules of the ancient
> > > arena to that list.
> > > Perhaps its time has come.
> > >
> > > Maxima Valeria Messallina
> > >
> > > _
> > >
> > >
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71157 From: shantipole2001 Date: 2009-10-16
Subject: Re: participating in real-world politics as an international "cultur
This is my thought exactly. While Nova Roma looks back and focuses on the past it is supposed to be a living, breathing group and as such it should work to bring its culture and values to the modern world in order to help give guidance to Nova Romans as they struggle with issues of the day.

And just to clear up a slight misunderstanding, I never suggested that NR attempt to address the UN or EU only that there are issues being discussed in those forum that would be interesting if Nova Romans were to discuss applying their particular virtues and values to the debate. Perhaps once I become a full member I will work on a proposal for a group dedicated to "International Issues." This might also help in outreach projects as it may make Nova Roma more relevant to those interested in becoming members but wondering how the NR belief system will help equip them with dealing with problems today.

There is nothing wrong in studying and holding the past in reverance but the sign of a true living philosophy is to figure out how this philosophy applies to today and to take the lessons of the past and attempt to apply them to the modern world. The very act of debating this I think would make NR even more vibrant than it is today. I look at the Roman Catholic Church in particular as an example of taking a belief system and at least attempting to use it and apply it to the problems of today. NR should not just look at the past but should look forward to the future. Or at least we should debate it as it seems this has already begun....

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, David Kling <tau.athanasios@...> wrote:
>
> Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus S.P.D.
>
> As Nova Romans we SHOULD be looking at things through a "Roman" filter and
> developing our own culture and mores based not only on antiquity but our
> modern understanding of things based on our understanding of values (from
> antiquity but placed in the present). I'd like to see the Collegium
> Pontificum address issues and concerns -- develop our own "talmud" like
> depository of knowledge.
>
> Vale;
>
> Modianus
>
> On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 9:49 AM, shantipole2001
> <mark@...>wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > Has anybody within NR with a solid understanding of Roman virtues thought
> > of addressing some of the real world issues being discussed in the halls of
> > the UN or EU?
> >
> > A Nova Roman will rightfully argue that the vurtues that ancient Rome were
> > built on still resonate in 2009. How would a Nova Roman view issues like
> > global warming, terrorism, multi-lateral international relations, crime and
> > punishment, etc. seen through the lens of Roman ideals?
> >
> > How can Nova Romans participate at a local, national and global political
> > level and how would their Nova Roman roots and beliefs color their approach
> > to the political questions of the day?
> >
> > Does Nova Roma have a position on any of these topical questions? How can
> > Nova Roma attempt to apply their beliefs to the reality of today to show
> > that it is a true living, breathing and relevant belief system?
> >
> > Much in the same way that the Roman Catholic Church interprets today's
> > events through their belief system, do Nova Romans as a group ever do the
> > same thing?
> >
> > These are all questions I personally find fascinating. I am just not sure
> > if they are relevant to what is going on in NR today but the quote in my
> > subject line is directly from the FAQ so I do hold out hope.
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71158 From: Cato Date: 2009-10-16
Subject: Re: SECOND CALL FOR CANDIDATES
Cato Curio Complutenso omnibusque in Foro SPD

Salvete!

Consul, can you tell us the status of the Album Civium, censors' tools, and election apparatus? Will we be able to hold the election as tentatively planned?

Valete,

Cato



--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "M.C.C." <complutensis@...> wrote:
>
> I hereby call for candidates to stand for election to the ordinary
> magistracies of the Comitia Centuriata and the Comitia Populi Tributa.
>
> Anyone wishing to serve in any of these positions must have been a
> citizen for at least six months by Kal. Ian. MMDCCLXIII (January 1st,
> 2010) and be an assiduus (tax-paying) citizen.
>
> I will convene the comitia for the elections at a later time in
> November, but candidates are welcome to announce themselves and begin
> campaigning if they wish.
>
> All potential candidates must contact me with their intention to stand
> for office directly by sending a message to curiatius-complutensis at
> yahoo dot es in order to be placed on the ballot. Please include the
> word "candidate" in the subject of the message, and be sure to tell me
> your full Nova Roman name and the office for which you will campaign.
> Simply announcing your candidacy to one of the lists shall not be
> accepted. You must write to me directly.
>
> Candidacies will be accepted until 3 November 2009 (18.00 hrs CET Rome;
> 12.00 hrs EST Philadelphia).
>
> The contio is tentatively scheduled to begin on 9 November, with the
> elections to follow tentatively beginning on 15 November.
>
> On behalf of the Res Publica Libera Senatus Populique Novae Romae I,
> Marcus Curiatius Complutensis, Senior Consul, hereby issue this call for
> candidates for the following offices:
>
> I CENSOR: Must be at least 27 years old as of Kal. Ian. 2763 (January
> 1st, 2010). Must already have served at least six months as a consul,
> praetor, aedilis, quaestor, tribunus plebis, magister aranearius
> (formerly curator araneae), editor commentariorum (formerly curator
> differum), rogator, or provincial governor. Must be assiduus.
>
> II CONSULS: Must be at least 27 years old as of Kal. Ian. 2763 (January
> 1st, 2010). Must already have served at least six months as a consul,
> praetor, aedilis, quaestor, tribunus plebis, magister aranearius
> (formerly curator araneae), editor commentariorum (formerly curator
> differum), rogator, or provincial governor. Must be assiduus.
>
> II PRAETORS: Must be at least 25 years old as of Kal. Ian. 2763 (January
> 1st, 2010). Must already have served at least six months as a consul,
> praetor, aedilis, quaestor, tribunus plebis, magister aranearius
> (formerly curator araneae), editor commentariorum (formerly curator
> differum), rogator, or provincial governor. Must be assiduus.
>
> II CURULE AEDILES: Must be at least 21 years old as of Kal. Ian. 2763
> (January 1st, 2010). Must be assiduus.
>
> VIII QUAESTORES: Must be at least 21 years old as of Kal. Ian. 2763
> (January 1st, 2010). Must be assiduus.
>
> II ROGATORES: Must be at least 21 years old as of Kal. Ian. 2763
> (January 1st, 2010). Must be assiduus.
>
> IV DIRIBITORES: Must be at least 21 years old as of Kal. Ian. 2763
> (January 1st, 2010). Must be assiduus.
>
> II CUSTODES: Must be at least 21 years old as of Kal. Ian. 2763 (January
> 1st, 2010). Must be assiduus.
>
> Datum sub manu mea ante diem XVI Kal. Nov. M. Curiatio Complutensis M.
> Iulio Severo consulibus, in anno AUC MMDCCLXII.
>
>
> M·CVRIATIVS·COMPLVTENSIS
> CONSVL NOVAE ROMAE
> CONSVL HISPANIAE
>
> NOVA ROMA
>
> -------------------------------------------
>
> ex paucis multa, ex minimis maxima
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71159 From: M.C.C. Date: 2009-10-16
Subject: Re: SECOND CALL FOR CANDIDATES
Curiatius Complutesis Consul Equitio Catonis Senator omnibus SPD

all these questions were answered by our IT team or have you missed these replies?




Cato escribió:
 

Cato Curio Complutenso omnibusque in Foro SPD

Salvete!

Consul, can you tell us the status of the Album Civium, censors' tools, and election apparatus? Will we be able to hold the election as tentatively planned?

Valete,

Cato

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com, "M.C.C." <complutensis@ ...> wrote:
>
> I hereby call for candidates to stand for election to the ordinary
> magistracies of the Comitia Centuriata and the Comitia Populi Tributa.
>
> Anyone wishing to serve in any of these positions must have been a
> citizen for at least six months by Kal. Ian. MMDCCLXIII (January 1st,
> 2010) and be an assiduus (tax-paying) citizen.
>
> I will convene the comitia for the elections at a later time in
> November, but candidates are welcome to announce themselves and begin
> campaigning if they wish.
>
> All potential candidates must contact me with their intention to stand
> for office directly by sending a message to curiatius-compluten sis at
> yahoo dot es in order to be placed on the ballot. Please include the
> word "candidate" in the subject of the message, and be sure to tell me
> your full Nova Roman name and the office for which you will campaign.
> Simply announcing your candidacy to one of the lists shall not be
> accepted. You must write to me directly.
>
> Candidacies will be accepted until 3 November 2009 (18.00 hrs CET Rome;
> 12.00 hrs EST Philadelphia) .
>
> The contio is tentatively scheduled to begin on 9 November, with the
> elections to follow tentatively beginning on 15 November.
>
> On behalf of the Res Publica Libera Senatus Populique Novae Romae I,
> Marcus Curiatius Complutensis, Senior Consul, hereby issue this call for
> candidates for the following offices:
>
> I CENSOR: Must be at least 27 years old as of Kal. Ian. 2763 (January
> 1st, 2010). Must already have served at least six months as a consul,
> praetor, aedilis, quaestor, tribunus plebis, magister aranearius
> (formerly curator araneae), editor commentariorum (formerly curator
> differum), rogator, or provincial governor. Must be assiduus.
>
> II CONSULS: Must be at least 27 years old as of Kal. Ian. 2763 (January
> 1st, 2010). Must already have served at least six months as a consul,
> praetor, aedilis, quaestor, tribunus plebis, magister aranearius
> (formerly curator araneae), editor commentariorum (formerly curator
> differum), rogator, or provincial governor. Must be assiduus.
>
> II PRAETORS: Must be at least 25 years old as of Kal. Ian. 2763 (January
> 1st, 2010). Must already have served at least six months as a consul,
> praetor, aedilis, quaestor, tribunus plebis, magister aranearius
> (formerly curator araneae), editor commentariorum (formerly curator
> differum), rogator, or provincial governor. Must be assiduus.
>
> II CURULE AEDILES: Must be at least 21 years old as of Kal. Ian. 2763
> (January 1st, 2010). Must be assiduus.
>
> VIII QUAESTORES: Must be at least 21 years old as of Kal. Ian. 2763
> (January 1st, 2010). Must be assiduus.
>
> II ROGATORES: Must be at least 21 years old as of Kal. Ian. 2763
> (January 1st, 2010). Must be assiduus.
>
> IV DIRIBITORES: Must be at least 21 years old as of Kal. Ian. 2763
> (January 1st, 2010). Must be assiduus.
>
> II CUSTODES: Must be at least 21 years old as of Kal. Ian. 2763 (January
> 1st, 2010). Must be assiduus.
>
> Datum sub manu mea ante diem XVI Kal. Nov. M. Curiatio Complutensis M.
> Iulio Severo consulibus, in anno AUC MMDCCLXII.
>
>
> M·CVRIATIVS·COMPLVTEN SIS
> CONSVL NOVAE ROMAE
> CONSVL HISPANIAE
>
> NOVA ROMA
>
> ------------ --------- --------- --------- ----
>
> ex paucis multa, ex minimis maxima
>

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71160 From: Maxima Valeria Messallina Date: 2009-10-16
Subject: Re: R: [Nova-Roma] I want to get involved but...
<<--- On Thu, 10/15/09, Cato <catoinnyc@...> wrote:

P.S. - did the ancient Romans refer to Rome as a "holy city"? A question, not a criticism.>>
 
Certainly, it was sacred to them, but it was more than just that. It was the natal of their identity as a people, the heart of their empire and the center of their culture. Thus the saying, "See Rome and die", to imply that to visit and know Rome was the highlight of one's life (for those who did not live there). For those who did, with all the problems of living in a large city - and there were lots of them - I've always had the impression that they still regarded themselves as the luckiest people in the world to have the good fortune to live in Rome, whether they had been born there or had come moved there later in life.  
 
Maxima Valeria Messallina

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71161 From: Maxima Valeria Messallina Date: 2009-10-16
Subject: Re: R: [Nova-Roma] I want to get involved but...
Since I do not subscribe to that list, I did not know that. Thank you for the information.

--- On Wed, 10/14/09, Colin Brodd <magisterbrodd@...> wrote:

From: Colin Brodd <magisterbrodd@...>
Subject: Re: R: [Nova-Roma] I want to get involved but...
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Date: Wednesday, October 14, 2009, 6:32 PM

 
Gaius Tullius Valerianus Gnaeo Cornelio Lentulo atque Maximae Valeriae Messallinae S.P.D.

Ummm .. . don't we have that already? I mean, it's called the Back Alley, but the idea is the same . . . 

Curate ut valeatis!

On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 8:43 PM, Maxima Valeria Messallina <maximavaleriamessal lina@yahoo. com> wrote:
 
<<--- On Wed, 10/14/09, Cn. Cornelius Lentulus <cn_corn_lent@ yahoo.it> wrote:

We would have to have another official mailing list for chatting convolutedly about everything and to fight internal political fights.>>
 
Didn't someone suggest we have a separate list for that and call it "The Arena"? I even posted about how we should adapt the rules of the ancient arena to that list.
Perhaps its time has come.
 
Maxima Valeria Messallina

_


Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71162 From: David Kling Date: 2009-10-16
Subject: Re: SECOND CALL FOR CANDIDATES
Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus Catoni salutem dicit

You're on the senate list right?  Didn't you get the memo there?  You should be asking that question of our IT/Tech folks instead of the consules.

Wait... you're not trying to start trouble/controversy again are you?  Nah....

Vale;

Modianus

On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 11:02 AM, Cato <catoinnyc@...> wrote:
 

Cato Curio Complutenso omnibusque in Foro SPD

Salvete!

Consul, can you tell us the status of the Album Civium, censors' tools, and election apparatus? Will we be able to hold the election as tentatively planned?

Valete,

Cato




Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71163 From: Maxima Valeria Messallina Date: 2009-10-16
Subject: Re: R: [Nova-Roma] I want to get involved but...
<<--- On Thu, 10/15/09, luciaiuliaaquila <dis_pensible@...> wrote:
"MVM: Didn't someone suggest we have a separate list for that and call it "The Arena"? I even posted about how we should adapt the rules of the ancient arena to that list. Perhaps its time has come."

Good Idea. *laughs* For as long as I can remember every time I see some of the more fervent and disturbing arguments that digress into personal attacks and name-calling I have entertained the idea that we should have a ML called "The Coliseum" and let opponents debate, argue and verbally spar to their hearts content.>>
 
 
LOL And before posting, they should be required to say to our Republic:
"Those of us who are about to argue until we're blue in the face, salute you!"
 
Maxima Valeria Messallina

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71164 From: Colin Brodd Date: 2009-10-16
Subject: Re: R: [Nova-Roma] I want to get involved but...
>Since I do not subscribe to that list, I did not know that. Thank you for the information.
     Well, it was somewhat tongue-in-cheek sarcasm, but the point is valid - if you want open discussion and heated debate, you can go to the Back Alley. If you want to maintain a high level of civility in discussions (which is nicer, but less open and passionate in nature), stick to the Main List. The Back Alley may not be an official part of Nova Roma, but it is certainly the place where the most spirited and passionate debate occurs (as far as I know - maybe the Senate is moreso!), but in many ways it is like the Arena concept someone mentioned - if you go there, don't expect to be coddled or unchallenged, And have a thick skin, because someone probably will insult you, sooner or later,
     The Classicists among us know that it is a complete fantasy to suppose that the Forum Romanum was a place of utter politeness and appropriate behavior - it manifestly was not - but here in our Forum, we find things are more productive if we adhere to basic decorum and civility. If that does not appeal to some citizens, they have a place to go . . .
 
Cheers,
Gaius Tullius Valerianus
 
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71165 From: Cato Date: 2009-10-16
Subject: Re: SECOND CALL FOR CANDIDATES
Cato Modiano sal.

Salve.

Do you always need to be so bitter and obnoxious? As has been said several times by several senators in the same Senate to which you refer, it is perfectly reasonable to ask these questions of the magistrates in charge of the Respublica. It is their responsibility to know these things, and to answer questions regarding them. They are absolutely valid questions, and were asked simply for information.

Vale,

Cato



--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, David Kling <tau.athanasios@...> wrote:
>
> Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus Catoni salutem dicit
>
> You're on the senate list right? Didn't you get the memo there? You should
> be asking that question of our IT/Tech folks instead of the consules.
>
> Wait... you're not trying to start trouble/controversy again are you?
> Nah....
>
> Vale;
>
> Modianus
>
> On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 11:02 AM, Cato <catoinnyc@...> wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > Cato Curio Complutenso omnibusque in Foro SPD
> >
> > Salvete!
> >
> > Consul, can you tell us the status of the Album Civium, censors' tools, and
> > election apparatus? Will we be able to hold the election as tentatively
> > planned?
> >
> > Valete,
> >
> > Cato
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71166 From: Shoshana Hathaway Date: 2009-10-16
Subject: Re: R: [Nova-Roma] I want to get involved but...
Salvete Omnes,
 
I has always been my impression that, if you lived in Rome, then Rome was THE city.  There were other cities, and they had their good points ...but nothing ever could possibly measure up to THE city.  I don't know if Rome was ever referred to as a Holy city in the sense that, say, Jerusalem was (and is), but I do think that, to the Roman citizen (or resident), just as the hearth was the heart of the home, Rome was the hearth, and, therefore, the heart, of the Republic, and later, the Empire.  In addition, if you were lucky enough to *be* Roman, you were inherently superior to everyone and everything else on the face of the Earth.  Hmmm ...wait ... am I speaking of Rome, or NYC? (just teasing, Cato!)
 
Vale optime,
C. Maria Caeca
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71167 From: David Kling Date: 2009-10-16
Subject: Re: SECOND CALL FOR CANDIDATES
Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus Catoni salutem dicit

If you have a question then ask it to the magistrate responsible in an e-mail directed at them.  Do not assume that every magistrate sits at their computer diligently reading the main list, and following every thread.  "Bitter and obnoxious."  There is something about a pot and a kettle and them both being black... nice try at obfuscation. 

Vale;

Modianus

On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 3:27 PM, Cato <catoinnyc@...> wrote:
 

Cato Modiano sal.

Salve.

Do you always need to be so bitter and obnoxious? As has been said several times by several senators in the same Senate to which you refer, it is perfectly reasonable to ask these questions of the magistrates in charge of the Respublica. It is their responsibility to know these things, and to answer questions regarding them. They are absolutely valid questions, and were asked simply for information.

Vale,

Cato




Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71168 From: Associazione Pomerium Date: 2009-10-16
Subject: 24 ottobre: le tombe della Via Latina, a Roma
Attachments :
     
     

     

    Associazione Pomerium

    L'Associazione culturale Pomerium  è lieta di invitarvi sabato 24 ottobre per una camminata in compagnia lungo un tratto dell'antica Via Latina.

    Il parco archeologico delle Tombe di Via Latina è uno dei complessi archeologici di maggior rilievo del suburbio di Roma che conserva ancora sostanzialmente intatto l’aspetto tradizionale dell’antica campagna romana. Nel sito si conservano un tratto dell’antica Via Latina, che collegava Roma con Capua, ancora pavimentata per un lungo tratto dell'antico basolato in selce, e su entrambi i lati numerosi monumenti funebri e testimonianze storiche e materiali dall’età repubblicana fino all’alto medioevo.

    (altre informazioni su http://archeoroma.beniculturali.it/it/luoghi/aree_monumenti/parco_tombe_via_latina)

    Laddove dovessimo raggiungere un  numero minimo si provvederà anche a prenotare la visita all'interno dei sepolcri, pertanto coloro che vogliono partecipare all'evento  sono pregati di comunicare la propria adesione a  info@pomerium.org .

    L'appuntamento è per le ore 15.00 all'uscita metro linea A - Arco di Travertino (cell. 3338527265)

    Info:www.pomerium.org  
    e-mail:
    segreteria@pomerium.org  


     

    Per informazioni:
    Associazione Pomerium - www.pomerium.org
    c/o Marocco F. - Viale Alessandrino 477 - 00172 Roma

    info@pomerium.org - amministrazione@pomerium.orgsegreteria@pomerium.org

     

    Vive ergo moribus praeteritis, loquere verbis praesentibus (Vivi perciò con la moralità degli antichi, ma usa le parole della modernità; A.Gellio - Notti Attiche)

    Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71169 From: rory12001 Date: 2009-10-16
    Subject: Re: SECOND CALL FOR CANDIDATES
    Salve Modiane;
    I ignore Cato, he knows the answer to his question and is just trolling for an argument.
    As for insulting you, well he thinks he's over at the BA where incidentally, Anna Minucia was thrown out for calling Sulla a liar. And that's the place where free speech reigns?
    vale
    Maior

    --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, David Kling <tau.athanasios@...> wrote:
    >
    > Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus Catoni salutem dicit
    >
    > If you have a question then ask it to the magistrate responsible in an
    > e-mail directed at them. Do not assume that every magistrate sits at their
    > computer diligently reading the main list, and following every thread.
    > "Bitter and obnoxious." There is something about a pot and a kettle and
    > them both being black... nice try at obfuscation.
    >
    > Vale;
    >
    > Modianus
    >
    > On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 3:27 PM, Cato <catoinnyc@...> wrote:
    >
    > >
    > >
    > > Cato Modiano sal.
    > >
    > > Salve.
    > >
    > > Do you always need to be so bitter and obnoxious? As has been said several
    > > times by several senators in the same Senate to which you refer, it is
    > > perfectly reasonable to ask these questions of the magistrates in charge of
    > > the Respublica. It is their responsibility to know these things, and to
    > > answer questions regarding them. They are absolutely valid questions, and
    > > were asked simply for information.
    > >
    > > Vale,
    > >
    > > Cato
    > >
    > >
    > >
    > >
    >
    Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71170 From: Cato Date: 2009-10-16
    Subject: Re: SECOND CALL FOR CANDIDATES
    Cato Modiano sal.

    Salve.

    OK, I get it. You're saying that the magistrate who started this thread, about upcoming elections, isn't wasting his time reading it. And that the magistrates in charge of the administration of the whole Respublica shouldn't be...bothered, I guess...to answer questions in public that are absolutely vital to the administration of the Respublica.

    Just wanted to be clear.

    Vale,

    Cato



    --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, David Kling <tau.athanasios@...> wrote:
    >
    > Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus Catoni salutem dicit
    >
    > If you have a question then ask it to the magistrate responsible in an
    > e-mail directed at them. Do not assume that every magistrate sits at their
    > computer diligently reading the main list, and following every thread.
    > "Bitter and obnoxious." There is something about a pot and a kettle and
    > them both being black... nice try at obfuscation.
    >
    > Vale;
    >
    > Modianus
    >
    > On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 3:27 PM, Cato <catoinnyc@...> wrote:
    >
    > >
    > >
    > > Cato Modiano sal.
    > >
    > > Salve.
    > >
    > > Do you always need to be so bitter and obnoxious? As has been said several
    > > times by several senators in the same Senate to which you refer, it is
    > > perfectly reasonable to ask these questions of the magistrates in charge of
    > > the Respublica. It is their responsibility to know these things, and to
    > > answer questions regarding them. They are absolutely valid questions, and
    > > were asked simply for information.
    > >
    > > Vale,
    > >
    > > Cato
    > >
    > >
    > >
    > >
    >
    Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71171 From: annaevsregvlvs Date: 2009-10-16
    Subject: Candidacy for Curule Aedile
    Salvete Omnes,

    I have thrown my murmillo into the arena for the magistracy of Curule Aedile. While I will hold off making any platform speech until the campaigning picks up a little, I wished to make it known that I would be running. For anyone with any questions regarding my candidacy\campaign, I can be reached via email (@ t.annaevsregvlvs at ymail dot com) and would welcome the opportunity to have individual discussions with cives. If anyone has questions they wish to ask publicly, feel free to post on this thread.

    More will follow when campaigning picks up.

    Valete,
    T. Annaeus Regulus
    Legatus Pro Praetor Canada Citerior
    Prospective Owner of a New Folding Chair
    Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71172 From: Patrick O Date: 2009-10-17
    Subject: SENATE CALL
    Fl. Galerius Aurelianus Tribunus Plebis s.p.d.

    I had announced that I would be on vacation between 10/05-10/12 and had thought that one of my colleagues would have announced the Senate Call on 10/09. I was mistaken and the announcement was not made. Since I am the duty Tribune for this month, it was solely my responsibility to see that it was done according to our leges. I render my apologies for my neglect of my duty and responsibility.

    ******************************************************************
    M. Curiatius Complutensis Consul: M. Iulio Severo Consuli collegae, Praetoribus, Tribunibus Plebis, Senatoribus Patribus Mátribusque Conscriptís, omnibus quibusque in senatu sententiam dicere licet S.P.D.

    Consul edicit ut senatus frequens adsit:

    The auspicia having been taken by Augur M. Moravius, "Aves admittunt!"

    I come seeking the advice of the Senate on the agenda posted in the Relatio.

    The Senate shall be called into session at 11,00 hour (CET) on 9 Oct. 2762, with discussions to continue until approximately sunset in Rome (17.00 hrs CET) on 13 Oct. 2762.

    Voting on the Agenda will then begin in the second hour at 06.45 hrs CET on 14 Oct. 2762 and conclude at 17.00 hrs CET on 18 Oct. 2762.

    Senatores and Senatrices should not vote during night time hours of their respective locations.

    RELATIO

    Quod bonum felixque sit populo Romano Quiritium, referimus ad vos, Patres et Matres conscripti:

    Item I.

    M. MINUCIUS AUDENS

    M. Minucius Audens resigned his citizenship and all his offices including his seat in the Nova Roman Senate. Under the terms of the Lex Minucia Moravia de civitate eiuranda former citizens must wait ninety days before they can be reinstated, unless the Senate waives the return period.

    Following a request from Censor Ti. Galerius Paulinus, the Consuls request the Senate of Nova Roma to waive the ninety day waiting period and to return M. Minucius Audens to Nova Roman citizenship.

    Quid de ea re fieri placet?

    ----------------------------

    Quod bonum felixque sit populo Romano Quiritium, referimus ad vos, Patres et Matres conscripti:

    Item II.

    SENATE RULES

    In recent times the Senate list has been becoming a tacky place for discussion, where everybody seems to feel authorized to attack and insult everybody.

    To avoid this situation, the Consuls propose the establishment of some minimum standards.

    - The Senate list must be under the moderation control of the Consuls.
    - The Contio will be moderated. Each Senator shall have her or his respective turns for speech and replies according to the traditions followed in ancient Rome. So nobody can monopolize the Senate rostrum and become the center of all debates.
    - The Senate list will be closed between sessions. If the Senatores would like to discuss Nova Roma matters, they can do this in private or in other forums.
    - Discussions will be not allowed during the voting time.
    - Off topic messages during contio or voting time will be rejected.

    Quid de ea re fieri placet?

    ----------------------------

    I call upon Minerva to grant Her wisdom into our deliberations, as a reminder to others to give sober thought to their words.

    Vos quod fexitis, Senatores et Senatrices, Deos Omnes fortunare velim.

    M·CVR·COMPLVTENSIS
    Consul Novae Romae
    Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71173 From: Shoshana Hathaway Date: 2009-10-17
    Subject: announcement of dandidacy
    Salve Omnes,

    I hereby announce my candidacy for the position of Quaestor in the upcoming
    election. I meet all specified requirements, and, as those who know me can
    attest, I am profoundly interested in the well being of our Res Publica, and
    willing to expend time in effort in her service.

    Vale Optime,
    C. Maria Caeca
    Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71174 From: Patrick O Date: 2009-10-17
    Subject: Re: Announcement of candidacy for Quaestor - C. Maria Caeca
    Fl. Galerius Aurelianus sal.

    I applaude and support the candidacy of C. Maria Caeca for Quaestor in the upcoming election. She is a good citizen and is a credit to the province of America Austrorientalis, which has produced many good magistrates, sacerdoes, and other servants of the Respublica. I wish her good fortune in the upcoming election.

    Valete.

    --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Shoshana Hathaway" <shoshanahathaway@...> wrote:
    >
    > Salve Omnes,
    >
    > I hereby announce my candidacy for the position of Quaestor in the upcoming
    > election. I meet all specified requirements, and, as those who know me can
    > attest, I am profoundly interested in the well being of our Res Publica, and
    > willing to expend time in effort in her service.
    >
    > Vale Optime,
    > C. Maria Caeca
    >
    Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71175 From: Shoshana Hathaway Date: 2009-10-17
    Subject: Re: Announcement of candidacy for Quaestor - C. Maria Caeca
    Caeca Galeriano sal,

    Gratias tibi ago, Tribunus. A commendation from a citizen of your status
    and demonstrated worth to the Republic is, at the very least, personally
    appreciated and encouraging.

    Vale Optime,
    C. Maria Caeca
    Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71176 From: Steve Moore Date: 2009-10-17
    Subject: Resignation

    M. Valerius Potitus omnibus SPD.

     

    I hereby resign my citizenship and my offices. This resignation takes effect at 09:00 CEST ( Rome time) on Oct. 17, 2009.

     

    Steve Moore

    Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71177 From: Cato Date: 2009-10-17
    Subject: a.d. XVI Kal. Nov.
    Cato omnibus in Foro SPD

    Salvete omnes!

    Hodiernus dies est ante diem XVI Kalendas Novembris; haec dies comitialis est.


    "After settling the army in their summer quarters, whilst all was
    quiet among the Samnites the consul began to purify it by getting rid
    of the mutinous spirits. Some were dismissed as having served their
    time; others were pronounced to be incapacitated through age or
    infirmity; others were sent home on furlough, at first separately,
    then selected cohorts were sent together, on the ground that they had
    passed the winter far from their homes and belongings. A large number
    were transferred to different places, ostensibly for the needs of the
    service. All these the other consul and the praetor detained in Rome
    on various imaginary pretexts. At first, unaware of the trick that was
    being played upon them, they were delighted to revisit their homes.
    They soon, however, found out that even those who were first sent away
    were not rejoining the colours and that hardly any were disbanded but
    those who had been in Campania, and amongst these mainly the leading
    agitators. At first they were surprised, and then they felt a
    well-grounded apprehension that their plans had leaked out. "Now,"
    they said, "we shall have to suffer court-martial, informers will give
    evidence against us, we shall one after another be executed in secret;
    the reckless and ruthless tyranny of the consuls and senators will be
    let loose on us." The soldiers, seeing how those who were the backbone
    of the conspiracy had been cleverly got rid of by the consuls, did not
    venture to do more than whisper these things to one another. One
    cohort, which was stationed not far from Antium, took up a position at
    Lantulae in a narrow pass between the mountains and the sea to
    intercept those whom the consul was sending home on the various
    pretexts mentioned above. They soon grew to a very numerous body, and
    nothing was wanting to give it the form of a regular army except a
    general. They moved on into the Alban district, plundering as they
    went, and entrenched themselves in a camp under the hill of Alba
    Longa. After completing their entrenchments they spent the rest of the
    day in arguing about the choice of a leader, as they had not
    sufficient confidence in any one amongst themselves. But who could be
    invited from Rome? Which of the patricians or plebeians would expose
    himself to such peril, or to whom could the cause of an army maddened
    by injustice be safely committed? The next day found them still
    engaged in the discussion, when some of those who had been dispersed
    in the marauding expedition brought back the information that Titus
    Quinctius was cultivating a farm in the neighbourhood and had lost all
    interest in his City and the honourable distinctions he had won. This
    man belonged to a patrician house, and after achieving great
    reputation as a soldier, had his military career cut short by a wound
    which made him lame in one of his feet, and he betook himself to a
    rural life, far from the Forum and its party struggles. On hearing his
    name mentioned they recalled the man to mind, and hoping that all
    might turn out well they ordered an invitation to be sent to him. They
    hardly expected that he would come voluntarily, and prepared to
    intimidate him into compliance. The messengers accordingly entered his
    farmhouse in the dead of night and woke him up from a sound sleep, and
    after telling him that there was no alternative, it must either be
    authority and rank or, if he resisted, death, they carried him off to
    the camp. On his arrival he was saluted as their commander, and all
    dismayed as he was by the strangeness and suddenness of the affair,
    the insignia of his office were brought to him and he was peremptorily
    told to lead them to the City. Acting on their own impulse rather than
    their leader's advice they plucked up their standards and marched in
    hostile array as far as the eighth milestone on what is now the Appian
    Way. They would have gone on at once to the City had they not received
    word that an army was on its march, and that M. Valerius Corvus had
    been nominated Dictator, with L. Aemilius Mamercus as his Master of
    the Horse, to act against them." - Livy, History of Rome 7.39


    ROMAN REPUBLICAN TERMS - DICTATOR

    A legal innovation of the Roman Republic, the dictator (Latin for "one
    who dictates (orders)") — officially known as the Magister Populi
    ("Master of the People"), the Praetor Maximus ("The supreme Praetor"),
    and the Magister Peditum ("Master of the Infantry") — was an
    extraordinary magistrate (magistratus extraordinarius) whose function
    was to perform extraordinary tasks exceeding the authority of any of
    the ordinary magistrates. The Roman Senate passed a senatus consultum
    authorizing the consuls to nominate a dictator, who was the sole
    exception to the Roman legal principles of collegiality (multiple
    tenants of the same office) and responsibility (being legally able to
    be held to answer for actions in office); there could never be more
    than one dictator at any one time for any reason, and no dictator
    could ever be held legally responsible for any action during his time
    in office for any reason. The dictator was the highest magistrate in
    degree of precedence (Praetor Maximus) and was attended by 24 lictors.

    On the establishment of the Roman republic the government of the state
    was entrusted to two consuls, that the citizens might be the better
    protected against the tyrannical exercise of the supreme power. But it
    was soon felt that circumstances might arise in which it was important
    for the safety of the state that the government should be vested in
    the hands of a single person, who should possess absolute power for a
    short time, and from whose decisions there should be no appeal to any
    other body. Thus it came to pass that in 501 BC, nine years after the
    expulsion of the kings, the dictatorship (dictatura) was instituted.

    By the original law respecting the appointment of a dictator (lex de
    dictatore creando) no one was eligible for this office, unless he had
    previously been consul. There are, however, a few instances in which
    this law was not observed. When a dictator was considered necessary,
    the Senate passed a senatus consultum that one of the consuls should
    nominate a dictator; and without a previous decree of the Senate the
    consuls did not have the power of naming a dictator. The nomination of the dictator by the consul was necessary in all cases. It was always made by the consul, probably without any witnesses, between midnight and morning.

    The Senate seems to have usually mentioned in their decree the name of
    the person whom the consul was to nominate but that the consul was not
    absolutely bound to nominate the person whom the Senate had named, is
    evident from the cases in which the consuls appointed persons in
    opposition to the wishes of the Senate. In later times the Senate
    usually entrusted the office of dictator to the consul who was nearest
    at hand. The nomination took place at Rome, as a general rule; and if
    the consuls were absent, one of them was recalled to the city,
    whenever it was practicable; but if this could not be done, a senatus
    consultum authorizing the appointment was sent to the consul, who
    thereupon made the nomination in the camp. Nevertheless, the rule was
    maintained that the nomination could not take place outside of Italy.
    Originally the dictator was reserved for a patrician. The first
    plebeian dictator was Gaius Marcius Rutilus, nominated in 356 BC by
    the plebeian consul Marcus Popillius Laenas.

    The superiority of the dictator's power to that of the consuls
    consisted chiefly of greater independence from the Senate, more
    extensive power of punishment without a trial by the people, and
    complete immunity from being held accountable for his actions.
    However, what gave the dictator such great control over Rome was his
    lack of a colleague to counter him. Thus, his decisions did not
    require ratification from another individual to take effect. Unlike
    the Consuls, which were required to cooperate with the Senate, the
    Dictator could act on his own authority without the Senate, though the
    dictator would usually act in unison with the Senate all the same.
    There was no appeal from the sentence of the dictator (unless the
    dictator changed his mind), and accordingly the lictors bore the axes
    in the fasces before them even in the city, as a symbol of their
    absolute power over the lives of the citizens.

    The dictator's imperium granted him the powers to change any Roman law
    as he saw fit, and these changes lasted as long as the dictator
    remained in power. He could introduce new laws into the Roman
    constitution which did not require ratification by any of the Roman
    assemblies, but were often put to a vote all the same. Two such
    examples would be Sulla's introduction of the dreaded proscriptions and the law that no man could run for the office of Consul a second time until a waiting period of 10 years had passed. Likewise, a dictator could act as a supreme judge, with no appeal for his decisions. These judicial powers made the dictator the supreme authority in both military and civil affairs.

    The relationship between the Dictator and the Tribunes of the Plebs is
    not entirely certain. The Tribune was the only magistrate to continue
    their independence of office during a dictatorship while the other
    magistrates served the dictator as officers. However, there is no
    reason to believe that they had any control over a dictator, or could
    hamper his proceedings by their power to veto, as they could in the
    case of the Consuls. This is believed to be explained by the fact that
    the law that created the dictatorship was passed before the
    institution of the Tribune of the Plebs, and consequently made no
    mention of it.

    Any magistrate owning imperium was not accountable for his actions as
    long as they continued to serve in an office that owned imperium.
    However, once a magistrate left office, he could face trial for their
    illegal deeds after the imperium had expired. This was not the case
    with the Dictator. The dictator was untouchable during his time in
    office, but was also not liable to be called to account for any of his
    official acts, illegal or otherwise, after his abdication of office.
    The dictator's actions were treated as though they never occurred (at
    least legally).

    The reasons which led to the appointment of a dictator required that
    there should be only one at a time. The dictators that were appointed
    for carrying on the business of the state were said to be nominated
    rei gerendae causa (for the matter to be done), or sometimes
    seditionis sedandae causa (for the putting down of rebellion); and
    upon them, as well as upon the other curule magistrates, imperium was
    conferred, for the reconstituting of the republic.

    Along with the Dictator there was always a Magister Equitum, the
    Master of the Cavalry or the Master of the Horse, to serve as the
    Dictator's most senior official. The nomination of the Magister
    Equitum was left to the choice of the Dictator, unless the senatus
    consultum specified, as was sometimes the case, the name of the person
    who was to be appointed. The Dictator could not be without a Magister
    Equitum to assist him, and, consequently, if the first Magister
    Equitum died during the six months of the dictatorship, another had to
    be nominated in his stead. The Magister Equitum was granted Praetorian
    imperium, thus was subject to the imperium of the Dictator, but in the
    Dictator's absence, he became his representative, and exercised the
    same powers as the Dictator. The imperium of the Magister Equitum was
    not regarded as superior to that of a Consul, but rather a par with a
    Praetor. It was usually considered necessary that the person who was
    to be nominated Magister Equitum should previously have been Praetor,
    but this was not regularly followed. Accordingly, the Magister Equitum
    had the insignia of a praetor: the toga praetexta and an escort of six
    lictors.


    Valete bene!

    Cato
    Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71178 From: David Kling Date: 2009-10-17
    Subject: Re: SECOND CALL FOR CANDIDATES
    Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus Catoni salutem dicit

    Being clear would have you being honest that you are looking for a fight.  You already knew the answer.  This was discussed in the senate, but not everyone who votes is in the senate.  So you want to paint the picture of a concerned citizen, and "pro-active" senator in hopes to garner votes for your bid for consul this year.  You are trying to cause controversy and trouble.  THAT is what you do.

    Vale;

    Modianus

    On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 9:37 PM, Cato <catoinnyc@...> wrote:
     

    Cato Modiano sal.

    Salve.

    OK, I get it. You're saying that the magistrate who started this thread, about upcoming elections, isn't wasting his time reading it. And that the magistrates in charge of the administration of the whole Respublica shouldn't be...bothered, I guess...to answer questions in public that are absolutely vital to the administration of the Respublica.

    Just wanted to be clear.

    Vale,

    Cato




    Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71179 From: Maxima Valeria Messallina Date: 2009-10-17
    Subject: More on the Hypatia movie
    There has been some discussion on these lists on Alejandro Amenabar's upcoming movie, "Agora', about Hypatia of Alexandria. I visited the official site for the film and if you have not taken a look at this site, I urge you to do so. 
    For starters, there is a different trailer than the one playing on You Tube. You can view it at the intro or it is the first one on the videos section. The second video offered there is the same as the You Tube one.
    I loved the starry background and the swirling planets as each section loads up. Very clever. My favorite is the Characters section, where you can read about the main characters of the film which includes comments from Amenabar and the actors themselves. I almost fell off my chair to read that Rachel Weisz had never heard of Hypatia beforehand! Obviously, there is a need for this film, if for nothing more than to acquaint the general public with this brilliant woman. 
    It was released in Spain last Friday, but I have found two conflicting release dates for the movie in the USA: either December 18 or 23.
     
     
    Maxima Valeria Messallina

    Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71180 From: Maxima Valeria Messallina Date: 2009-10-17
    Subject: Re: announcement of candidacy
    Salve, Caeca
     
    I am happy to hear you are running for Quaestor and thank you for your willingness to serve our Respublica. You have my complete support!
     
    Vale bene in pace Deorum,
     
    Maxima Valeria Messallina
    Sacerdos Vestalis


    --- On Fri, 10/16/09, Shoshana Hathaway <shoshanahathaway@...> wrote:

    From: Shoshana Hathaway <shoshanahathaway@...>
    Subject: [Nova-Roma] announcement of dandidacy
    To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
    Cc: "Shoshana Hathaway" <SHOSHANAHATHAWAY@comcast..net>
    Date: Friday, October 16, 2009, 9:32 PM

     
    Salve Omnes,

    I hereby announce my candidacy for the position of Quaestor in the upcoming
    election. I meet all specified requirements, and, as those who know me can
    attest, I am profoundly interested in the well being of our Res Publica, and
    willing to expend time in effort in her service.

    Vale Optime,
    C. Maria Caeca


    Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71181 From: Publius Ullerius Stephanus Venator Date: 2009-10-17
    Subject: Re: [BackAlley] Resignation
    Salve Steve;

    On Sat, Oct 17, 2009 at 1:50 AM, Steve Moore wrote:
    >
    > M. Valerius Potitus omnibus SPD.
    >
    > I hereby resign my citizenship and my offices.
    > This resignation takes effect at 09:00 CEST (Rome time) on Oct. 17, 2009.
    >
    > Steve Moore
    >

    I've gone back over the discussions in which you were involved. I can
    see the origin of this...unfortunate action on your part.

    In some ways, I wish we could strip the past 10 years of "progress"
    from our "Laws" and history, restart from the point where Vedius
    completed his term as Dictator.

    Ah well, the thing is to keep trying on one's own part of the whole,
    as one can and is willing to do.

    Vale - Venator
    Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71182 From: Shoshana Hathaway Date: 2009-10-17
    Subject: Re: announcement of candidacy
    Caeca Messalinae sal,
     
    Thank you, and I shall endeavor to earn it (smile).
     
    C. Maria Caeca
    Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71183 From: luciaiuliaaquila Date: 2009-10-17
    Subject: Re: R: [Nova-Roma] I want to get involved but...
    Salve,

    > LOL And before posting, they should be required to say to our Republic:
    > "Those of us who are about to argue until we're blue in the face, salute you!"

    *laughs* Of course, it will be overseen by a Consul, and will be announced right here on the ML with a link;)
    Really, with a bit of tweaking, it is not a bad idea. In some cases it could even be fun.
    I bet I can think of two or three who would be constant actors~

    Vale,

    Julia

    --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Maxima Valeria Messallina <maximavaleriamessallina@...> wrote:
    >
    > <<--- On Thu, 10/15/09, luciaiuliaaquila <dis_pensible@...> wrote:
    >
    > "MVM: Didn't someone suggest we have a separate list for that and call it "The Arena"? I even posted about how we should adapt the rules of the ancient arena to that list. Perhaps its time has come."
    >
    > Good Idea. *laughs* For as long as I can remember every time I see some of the more fervent and disturbing arguments that digress into personal attacks and name-calling I have entertained the idea that we should have a ML called "The Coliseum" and let opponents debate, argue and verbally spar to their hearts content.>>
    >  
    >  
    > LOL And before posting, they should be required to say to our Republic:
    > "Those of us who are about to argue until we're blue in the face, salute you!"
    >  
    > Maxima Valeria Messallina
    >
    Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71184 From: Patrick O Date: 2009-10-17
    Subject: CALL FOR PLEBEIAN CANDIDATES
    CALL FOR PLEBEIAN CANDIDATES

    Fl. Galerius Aurelianus, Tribunus Plebis, omnes civibus Novae Romae s.p.d.

    A call for Candidates is hereby issued for the offices of Tribuni Plebis and Aediles Plebis. The elected candidates will have their terms of office begin AVC 2762 a.d. IV Idus Dec. (10 December 2009). Any and all Assidui Plebeian Citizens who wish to serve the Respublica and the People for the next year shall:

    ( I ) declare their candidacy to the current Tribuni Plebis

    and

    ( II ) announce their intention to run for office before the Comitia Plebis Tributa (ComitiaPlebisTribut a@yahoogroups. com).

    Announcements of candidacy for these offices that are made to any other official Nova Roma lists are allowed but will not meet the requirements needed to be recognized as a candidate. All who seek candidacy MUST post their announcement to the Comitia Plebis Tributa.

    Eligibility Requirements:

    Tribunus Plebis - (V positions available) Candidates must be Cives in good standing for at least six full months before taking office; members of the Plebeian Ordo, Assidui before declaring candidacy, and at least 21 years of age by AUC MMDCCLXII a.d. IV Idus Dec (10 Dec 2009).

    Aedilis Plebis - (II positions available) Candidates must be Cives in good standing for at least six full months before taking office; members of the Plebeian Ordo, Assidui before declaring their candidacy, and at least 21 years of age by AUC MMDCCLXII a.d. IV Idus Dec (10 Dec 2009). Candidates for Aedilis Plebis must also have served at least six months as a Tribunus Plebis, Quaestor, Magister Aranearius, Editor Commentariorum, or Provincial Gubenator (governor); or that they have served as a scribe to one of the current Aediles Plebis for at least six months.

    Time Limits for Declaring Candidacy:

    Announcements of candidacy before the Comitia Plebis Tributa and declaration of candidacy to the Tribuni Plebis must be received no later than 23.59 CET 3 Nov (before midnight at Rome being 6:00 p.m. EDT or 3:00 p.m. PDT, AUC MMDCCLXII (2009 Gregorian).

    Datum sub manu mea ante diem XVI Kalendas Novembris M. Curiatio Complutensis M. Iulio Severo consulibus, in anno AUC MMDCCLXII.

    Fl. Galerius Aurelianus Tribunus Plebis
    Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71185 From: Maxima Valeria Messallina Date: 2009-10-17
    Subject: Re: R: [Nova-Roma] I want to get involved but...
    Yes, the names of two well known combatants immediately spring to mind. ;P
     
    I think it would be the perfect place to unleash the gladiator, or gladiatrix, within. LOL
     
    Maxima Valeria Messallina


    --- On Sat, 10/17/09, luciaiuliaaquila <dis_pensible@...> wrote:

    From: luciaiuliaaquila <dis_pensible@...>
    Subject: Re: R: [Nova-Roma] I want to get involved but...
    To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
    Date: Saturday, October 17, 2009, 10:35 AM

     
    Salve,

    > LOL And before posting, they should be required to say to our Republic:
    > "Those of us who are about to argue until we're blue in the face, salute you!"

    *laughs* Of course, it will be overseen by a Consul, and will be announced right here on the ML with a link;)
    Really, with a bit of tweaking, it is not a bad idea. In some cases it could even be fun.
    I bet I can think of two or three who would be constant actors~

    Vale,

    Julia

    --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com, Maxima Valeria Messallina <maximavaleriamessa llina@... > wrote:
    >
    > <<--- On Thu, 10/15/09, luciaiuliaaquila <dis_pensible@ ...> wrote:
    >
    > "MVM: Didn't someone suggest we have a separate list for that and call it "The Arena"? I even posted about how we should adapt the rules of the ancient arena to that list. Perhaps its time has come."
    >
    > Good Idea. *laughs* For as long as I can remember every time I see some of the more fervent and disturbing arguments that digress into personal attacks and name-calling I have entertained the idea that we should have a ML called "The Coliseum" and let opponents debate, argue and verbally spar to their hearts content.>>
    >  
    >  
    > LOL And before posting, they should be required to say to our Republic:
    > "Those of us who are about to argue until we're blue in the face, salute you!"
    >  
    > Maxima Valeria Messallina
    >


    Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71186 From: RG Date: 2009-10-17
    Subject: Join us at our Military History Group
    [this ads is approved, for it seems that this group just deals about strategy, military art, military history, etc. and that its name is not related to the German "3rd Reich" and its institutions. If it were the case, thanx every contributor of this list inform us praetors so that NR may not support such discussion group - Pr. PMA]


    The group's moderator was away for more than a few years but has recently returned, and welcomes all to join at:

    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/rommelshq/
    Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71187 From: Cato Date: 2009-10-18
    Subject: a.d. XV Kal. Nov.
    Cato omnibus in Foro SPD

    Salvete omnes!

    Hodiernus dies est ante diem XV Kalendas Novembris; haec dies comitialis est.

    "As soon as they came into view and recognised the arms and standards,
    the thought of their country instantly calmed the passions of them
    all. They had not yet been hardened to the sight of civic bloodshed,
    they knew of no wars but those against foreign foes, and secession
    from their own countrymen began to be looked upon as the last degree
    of madness. First the leaders then the men on both sides sought an
    opening for negotiations. Quinctius, who had had enough of fighting
    for his country and was the last man to fight against it, and Corvus,
    who was devoted to all his countrymen, especially to the soldiers and
    above all to his own army, came forward to a colloquy. When the latter
    was recognised, his opponents showed as much respect for him as his
    own men by the silence with which they prepared to listen to him. He
    addressed them as follows: 'Soldiers! When I left the City I offered
    up prayers to the immortal gods who watch over our State, your State
    and mine, that they would of their goodness grant me, not a victory
    over you, but the glory of bringing about a reconciliation. There have
    been and there will be abundant opportunities for winning glory in
    war, on this occasion we must seek for peace. That which I implored of
    the immortal gods, when I offered up my prayers, you have it in your
    power now to grant me if you will please to remember that you are
    encamped not in Samnium, not amongst the Volscians, but on Roman soil.
    Those hills which you see are the hills of your City; I, your consul,
    am the man under whose auspices and leadership you twice defeated the
    legions of the Samnites a year ago and twice captured their camp. I am
    Marcus Valerius Corvus, soldiers, a patrician it is true, but my
    nobility has shown itself in benefits to you, not in wrongs; I have
    never been the author of any law bearing harshly on you or of any
    oppressive enactment of the senate; in all my commands I have been
    stricter with myself than with you. If noble birth, if personal merit,
    if high office, if distinguished service could make any man proud, I
    venture to say that such is my descent, such the proof I have given of
    myself, such the age at which I obtained the consulship, being only
    twenty-three, that I had it in my power to show myself harsh and
    overbearing not only to the plebs but even to the patricians. What
    have you heard that I have said or done as consul more than I should
    had I been one of your tribunes? In that spirit I administered two
    successive consulships, in that spirit will this dread Dictatorship be
    administered; I shall not be more gentle towards these soldiers of
    mine and of my country than to you who would be-I loathe the word-its
    enemies.

    'You then will draw the sword against me before I shall draw it
    against you; if there is to be fighting it is on your side that the
    advance will be sounded, on your side will the battle-shout and charge
    begin. Make up your minds to do what your fathers and
    grandfathers-those who seceded to the Sacred Mount and those who
    afterwards took possession of the Aventine-could not make up their
    minds to do! Wait till your wives and mothers come out from the City
    with dishevelled hair to meet you as they once came to meet
    Coriolanus! Then the Volscian legions refrained from attacking us
    because they had a Roman for their general; will not you, an army of
    Romans, desist from an impious war? Titus Quinctius! by whatever means
    you were placed in your present position, whether willingly or
    unwillingly, if there is to be a conflict, retire, I beg you to the
    rearmost line; it will be more honourable for you to flee from a
    fellow-citizen than to fight against your country. But if there is to
    be peace you will take your place with honour amongst the foremost and
    play the part of a beneficent mediator in this conference. Demand what
    is just and you shall receive it, though we should acquiesce even in
    what is unjust rather than embrue impious hands in one another's
    blood.' T. Quinctius, bathed in tears, turned to his men and said:
    'If, soldiers, I am of any use at all you will find that I am a better
    leader in peace than in war. The words you have heard are not those of
    a Volscian or a Samnite but of a Roman. They were spoken by your
    consul, your commander, soldiers, whose auspices you have found by
    experience to be favourable for you; do not desire to learn by
    experience what they may be when directed against you. The senate had
    at its disposal other generals more ready to fight against you; it has
    selected the one man who has showed most consideration for his
    soldiers, in whom you have placed most confidence as your commander.
    Even those who have victory in their power wish for peace, what ought
    we to wish for? Why do we not lay aside all resentment and ambitious
    hopes-those treacherous advisers-and trust ourselves and all our
    interests to his tried fidelity?' " - Livy, History of Rome 7.40


    ROMAN REPUBLICAN TERMS - THE TWELVE TABLES

    The Law of the Twelve Tables (Lex Duodecim Tabularum, more informally
    simply Duodecim Tabulae) was the ancient legislation that stood at the
    foundation of Roman law. The Law of the Twelve Tables formed the
    centerpiece of the constitution of the Roman Republic and the core of
    the mos maiorum. The Twelve Tables must be distinguished from the
    unrelated, much older "twelve shields" of King Numa Pompilius. The
    Ancile, in ancient Rome, is the legendary shield of the god Mars said
    to have fallen from heaven upon Numa Pompilius. At the same time, a
    voice was heard which declared that Rome should be mistress of the
    world while the shield was preserved. The Ancile was, as it were, the
    palladium of Rome. Though there was but one Ancile that fell from
    heaven, there were twelve preserved, called the Ancilia; Numa, by the
    advice, as it is said, of the nymph Egeria, ordered eleven others,
    perfectly like the first, to be made. This was so that if anyone
    should attempt to steal it, as Ulysses did the Palladium, they might
    not be able to distinguish the true Ancile from the false ones.

    These Ancilia were preserved in the temple of Mars, and were committed
    to the care of twelve priests of Salii, instituted for that purpose.
    They were carried every year, in the month of March, in procession
    around Rome, and on the 30th day of that month, were again deposited
    in their place.

    According to traditional, semi-legendary historical accounts preserved
    in Livy, during the earliest period of the Republic the laws were kept
    secret by the pontifices and other representatives of the patrician
    class, and were enforced with untoward severity, especially against
    the plebeian class. A plebeian named Terentilius proposed in 462 BC
    that an official legal code should be published, so that plebeians
    could not be surprised and would know the law.

    For several years patricians opposed this request, but in 451 BC a
    Decemvirate, or board of ten men, was appointed to draw up a code.
    They allegedly sent an embassy to study the legislative system of the
    Greeks, particularly the laws of Solon, possibly in the Greek colonies
    of southern Italy.

    The first ten codes were completed by the first Decemvirate in 450 BC.
    Here is how Livy describes their creation, "...every citizen should
    quietly consider each point, then talk it over with his friends, and,
    finally, bring forward for public discussion any additions or
    subtractions which seemed desirable." The last two codes were
    completed in 449 BC by the second Decemvirate, and after a secessio
    plebis to force the Senate to consider them, the Law of the Twelve
    Tables was formally promulgated. The Twelve Tables were literally
    drawn up on twelve ivory tablets which were posted in the Forum
    Romanum so that all Romans could read and know them.

    The laws of the Twelve Tables were not a comprehensive statement of
    all law; they are a sequence of definitions of various private rights
    and procedures, similar to a bill of rights. They generally took for
    granted such things as the institutions of the family, and various
    rituals for formal transactions. For such an important document, it
    is somewhat surprising that the original text has been lost. The
    original tablets were destroyed when the Gauls under Brennus burnt
    Rome in 390 BC. There was no other official promulgation of them to
    survive, only unofficial editions. What we have of them today is brief
    excerpts and quotations from these laws in other authors. They are
    written in a strange, archaic, laconic, and somewhat childish and
    sing-song version of Latin. As such, though we cannot tell whether the
    quoted fragments accurately preserve the original form, what we have
    gives us some insight into the grammar of early Latin.

    Like most other primitive laws, they combine strict and rigorous
    penalties with equally strict and rigorous procedural forms. In most
    of the surviving quotations from these texts, the original table that
    held them is not given. Scholars have guessed at where surviving
    fragments belong by comparing them with the few known attributions. It
    cannot be known with any certainty from what survives that the
    originals ever were organised this way, or even if they ever were
    organised by subject at all.


    Today is also the feast day of St. Luke, Apostle and Martyr. Luke is
    represented by an ox, symbolizing the earthly nature of Christ.


    A thought for the day, from Florus' "Poems", VIII:

    "'Tis as bad possessing money as to live in penury;
    Just as bad perpetual daring as perpetual modesty;
    Just as bad is too much silence as too much loquacity;
    Just as bad the girl you visit as the wife at home can be.
    None can say that this is falsehood: none but does the contrary."


    Valete bene!

    Cato
    Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71188 From: Timothy or Stephen Gallagher Date: 2009-10-18
    Subject: The Latin Phrase of the Day
    Salvete
     
     
    Nullus est liber tam malus ut non aliqua parte prosit - There is no book so bad that it is not profitable on some part. (Pliny the Younger)
     
     
    Valete
     
    Ti. Galerius Paulinus
    Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71189 From: Timothy or Stephen Gallagher Date: 2009-10-18
    Subject: Asterix is 50!
    Salvete,
     
     
    Asterix is 50!:

    http://www.independ ent.co.uk/ news/people/ hit-and-run/ hit--run- itrsquos- the-lsquobig- lrsquo-for- asterix-1802085. html
    http://www.independ ent.co.uk/ arts-entertainme nt/tv/features/ asterix-and- the-half- century-- 50-years- fighting- the-romans- 1804371.html
    http://www.google. com/hostednews/ afp/article/ ALeqM5jAFFBLDseb XhYlpGaL4A6nlDjT 5Q
     
    Valete,
     
    Ti. Galerius Paulinus
    Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71190 From: publiusalbucius Date: 2009-10-18
    Subject: Re: Asterix is 50!
    Paulino omnibus s.d.

    Yes, and next thursday Oct. 22 will live the rush for the new release in Gallia's bookshops and hypermarkets.It is going to be an extra-ordinary album with short stories and messages that most of the characters of the successive books will send Asterix, included a one from Caesar!

    But don't believe The Independent (first link below) when the newspaper writes: "To mark the occasion, the books' publisher, Orion, is organising an exhibition showcasing some of the original Asterix artwork at the *only surviving Gallo-Roman monument* in the whole of France": happily for us all Romans, Gallo-Roman remains in the French part of Gallia may be counted by dozens!!

    I particularly recommand the 2nd link to the Independent that you provide, Pauline: it is a well documented 'paper'. It shows inter alia that some French names (for ex. the dog's one) have been changed to fit the various cultures around the world. Sometimes the result is happy, sometimes less.

    Last, for the most interested among us: Asterix and Obelix village is the current Erquy, in Bretagne (go to Google Maps or Earth!). :-)

    Vale Pauline et omnes,


    P. Memmius Albucius
    gov. Galliae



    --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Timothy or Stephen Gallagher <spqr753@...> wrote:
    >
    >
    > Salvete,
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >
    > Asterix is 50!:
    >
    > http://www.independent.co.uk/news/people/hit-and-run/hit--run-itrsquos-the-lsquobig-lrsquo-for-asterix-1802085.html
    > http://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/tv/features/asterix-and-the-half-century--50-years-fighting-the-romans-1804371.html
    > http://www.google.com/hostednews/afp/article/ALeqM5jAFFBLDsebXhYlpGaL4A6nlDjT5Q
    >
    >
    >
    > Valete,
    >
    >
    >
    > Ti. Galerius Paulinus
    >
    Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71191 From: Aqvillivs Date: 2009-10-18
    Subject: Thesis: ROMAN LEGIONS LOOKED DIFFERENT
    Salvete omnes,

    I have a technical problem and therefore a presumption and thesis about the optical appearance of Roman armor.

    Currently I often use my lorica segmentata. Athenticity is what I really care fore and that made me use a lorica
    which is of the lowest metal quality available out there. It is not out of stainless steel plates like many use, but of a lower steel
    quality which indeed can rust fast. It appears to me that ancient metal quality was indeed not the way one would find today.
    Wearing it and working in it is by the way a much more pleasant experience than one would think.
    What happens is, that sweat on the tunica does get in contact with the metal, which causes the metal to oxidize within 3 to 4 hours after initial contact with sweat.
    Maintenance (as i know it) requires a constant greasing or oiling of of the metal and leather pieces.
    Now,  that i do not use a metal brush to get the surface rust of (I only use a cloth and oil) the entire piece gets a beautiful (at least to me) anthrazit/brown patina. it stays shiny but black/anthrazit/brown (very spotted).

    Questions? 
                                    Is there any proof of the use of anything else than oil, grease witch was used to prevent oxidation?
                                    
                                      How realistic is it, if  there was nothing else than oil and grease, that they had enough with them for such constant
                                       required (at least daily) maintenance?

                                      In case(very well possible) it was a part of a soldier's daily routine to maintain and treat the armor or chain mail like that,
                                       did they use metal brushes?

    What follows at least to me:

                                    No matter in which ways they treated or maintained the metal, it would have gotten brown to dark brown, anthrazit
                                     after a relative short period of time. This seems to be an inevitable fact. After using the equipment day in day out,
                                      in rain and sun in the cold and hot weather conditions, with scratching and rubbing, oxidation was a fact.
                                     
                                       Different to what we are used to see in movies, documentaries and many roman military re-enactments,
                                        the Roman legionarius in his chain mail or lorica was a rather brown to anthrazit appearance! Sometimes dull
                                         and sometimes with an oily shine. Maybe that is it, what is meant by a lot of descriptions and only our polished modern
                                       view associates it with a shiny metal color.
                                      
                                        How ever, if this is correct, a very interesting thing follows for the authenticity of today's military tunics. It is
                                         mentioned in writings that the color of tunics was to hide fresh blood. If this is true the color must have been of dark
                                          to almost a brownish Burgundy. My experience with the materials is, that the color dark pale burgundy would:
                                         
                                              1. hide relatively fresh blood
                                               2. hide inevitable oil, rust and grease stains
                                                3. hide inevitable fabric repairs
                                                 4. fit the fact that ancient natural coloring processes for tunics especially produced in masses tends to be pale and dull

                                          I am defending the color dark burgundy of tunics because of these facts. White, light blue and signal red in combination
                                          with mirror like, polished and shiny armor what is often seen in re-enactments
                                          (unfortunately a lot here in the US) is very far from authenticity and practicality. It reminds me more of a bad toga party than
                                           serious and authentic re-enactment.
                                             
                                         It appears to me that an ancient Roman unit or line would have to be imagined rather dark in color with some gray, light
                                          golden and pale colours, red from shields, helmets gladii etc.
                                         
                                         To me, and I use the equipment very often for work this seems to be the case. The fact that the Roman soldier was living
                                          an extremely hard routine with tough work in all weather conditions, not to speak from combat and the fact that it often
                                          ocured that supplies where short or even lost or unavailable, our optical imagination of the Roman Legions in terms
                                           of colors and appearance has to change drastically.


    If one out there has knowledge of some methods of armor maintenance within the legions or about the subject in general. Please respond.


    Thanks

    C. AQVILLIVS ROTA
    PROCURATOR PROVINCIA AAe

    Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71192 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2009-10-18
    Subject: Re: Thesis: ROMAN LEGIONS LOOKED DIFFERENT
    Salve Aquillia,

    Aqvillivs <c.aqvillivs_rota@...> writes:

    > I have a technical problem and therefore a presumption and thesis about
    > the optical appearance of Roman armor.

    > Is there any proof of the use of
    > anything else than oil, grease witch was used to prevent oxidation?

    No. There's very little written evidence of any sort that has
    survived which discusses the day to day maintenance of the Roman
    legionary's personal gear. Given the variations in detail that have
    been found in the bits of personal armor that have been dug up, it's
    probably reasonable to assume that if a preservation technique existed
    some soldier tried it. You might want to ask around the Roman Army
    Times mailing list for advice from other re-enactors.

    However, you may have made an unwarranted assumption about the quality
    of the steel used for lorica segmentata. While it wasn't modern
    stainless steel (since such didn't exist) it appears to have been made
    from high carbon steel that was significantly less rust prone than
    ordinary cast or forged iron.

    Vale,

    CN-EQVIT-MARINVS
    Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71193 From: Aqvillivs Date: 2009-10-18
    Subject: Re: Thesis: ROMAN LEGIONS LOOKED DIFFERENT
    Salve Marinus,

    Thanks for the reply. I am glad you lectured me about the steel quality.
    The lorica I use is of high carbon steel. So I assume it is indeed very
    close to the ancient material.

    I am glad to hear this since I feel that what I observe is pretty
    similar as what the ancients experienced.
    Maybe I should attach a pic of the patina and over all looks of the
    armor. I personally think it is getting more and
    more beautiful (personal taste). It is though a very dark metal look
    with brown spots and grey metal.


    C.Aquillius

    --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Gnaeus Equitius Marinus <gawne@...>
    wrote:
    >
    > Salve Aquillia,
    >
    > Aqvillivs c.aqvillivs_rota@... writes:
    >
    > > I have a technical problem and therefore a presumption and thesis
    about
    > > the optical appearance of Roman armor.
    >
    > > Is there any proof of the use of
    > > anything else than oil, grease witch was used to prevent oxidation?
    >
    > No. There's very little written evidence of any sort that has
    > survived which discusses the day to day maintenance of the Roman
    > legionary's personal gear. Given the variations in detail that have
    > been found in the bits of personal armor that have been dug up, it's
    > probably reasonable to assume that if a preservation technique existed
    > some soldier tried it. You might want to ask around the Roman Army
    > Times mailing list for advice from other re-enactors.
    >
    > However, you may have made an unwarranted assumption about the quality
    > of the steel used for lorica segmentata. While it wasn't modern
    > stainless steel (since such didn't exist) it appears to have been made
    > from high carbon steel that was significantly less rust prone than
    > ordinary cast or forged iron.
    >
    > Vale,
    >
    > CN-EQVIT-MARINVS
    >
    Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71194 From: rory12001 Date: 2009-10-18
    Subject: the Saturnalia thread
    Maior Quiritibus spd;

    I'm throwing a Saturnalia party this year for my friends, and I started this thread to toss around ideas and later save them to the NRwiki for everyone.

    Since it's a mixed group of Latin lovers, cultores, friends, etc...I was thinking of mixing up some Mulsum, making some kind of Roman food (who doesn't like Italian food), music - maybe contemporary: Amy Winehouse, and perhaps maybe some Roman games. I'm not sure. I want it to be fun.

    Any suggestions will be gratefully appreciated; my friends have expectations, so I'd really like it to be great.
    vale
    Maior
    Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71195 From: Publius Ullerius Stephanus Venator Date: 2009-10-18
    Subject: Re: Thesis: ROMAN LEGIONS LOOKED DIFFERENT
    Salve Rota;

    Bringing this several centuries forward, browning is a much easier
    process than blueing of steel.

    It is my preferred finish when I build muzzle loading firearms.

    The advantage is that it is a cold process, using fewer chemicals,
    than blueing, which is a hot process.

    Properly oiled, surface rust is a pretty stable surface that protect
    the underlying substrate.

    =============================
    In amicitia et fide
    Publius Ullerius Stephanus Venator
    Cutler, armorer and gunsmith
    Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71196 From: Marcus Audens Date: 2009-10-18
    Subject: "Roman Times Quarterly" (RTQ)
    Ladies and Gentlemen;

    The last RTQ was published and placed in the files of

    >>NewRoman@yahoogroups.com<<

    should anyone have an interest.  The publication can be downloaded for those who wish to have a hard copy of the publication for no charge.

    The last two issues of "Pilum" have been placed in the Sodalitas Militarium to which I have the honor to belong, for anyone who may have an interest in the Roman Military.  The Militarium is extremely easy to join to access this material.

    My thanks to all those who have written me in support of my illness.  I do appreciate it very much.

    Respectfully;

    Marcus Audens

    Command is a matter of wisdom, integrity, humanity, courage and dicipline. Sun Tzu -- "The Art of War"
    Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71197 From: QFabiusMaxmi@aol.com Date: 2009-10-19
    Subject: Re: Thesis: ROMAN LEGIONS LOOKED DIFFERENT
    In a message dated 10/18/2009 10:39:52 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time, c.aqvillivs_rota@... writes:
    Currently I often use my lorica segmentata. Athenticity is what I really care fore and that made me use a lorica which is of the lowest metal quality available out there. It is not out of stainless steel plates like many use, but of a lower steel quality which indeed can rust fast.
     
    Fabius: You do know that the Segmentata is a made up name.  We have no idea what the Romans called  it other then "Armor"
    It appears to me that ancient metal quality was indeed not the way one would find today.
     
    Fabius:  I  would agree with that.  Core samples taken from the ice surrounding central Italy, dated to the period seems to indicate that true carbonized steel is still in the future.   Often iron would be buried in the earth to rust, and after the oxidized iron was scraped away, the remaining metal would actually be harder. (Poseidonius)   

    Wearing it and working in it is by the way a much more pleasant experience than one would think.
    What happens is, that sweat on the tunica does get in contact with the metal, which causes the metal to oxidize within 3 to 4 hours after initial contact with sweat.
     
    Fabius:  Which is why the legionary  never wore his armor on the march. (Josephus.)  he put it on before battle.  Usually it was carried in the tent group's wagon.  

    Maintenance (as i know it) requires a constant greasing or oiling of of the metal and leather pieces.
    Fabius: The leather straps had to be kept supple since they were what allowed the articulation of the lorica.  The bronze hooks were also important, since they had a tendency to break.  I have found many of one in the trash heaps surrounding the forts.
     
    Tactius in History gives the impression that mail, scale, and plates, were dull.  Before the triumphal entry into Rome, by Vitellius, Tactius elaborates on how everybody worked to look impressive.  Armor glittered, tunics were whitened, and soldiers' medallions and decorations were a fixed to the armor.  This is obviously out of the ordinary.     
    Lobster shell cuirasses were usually gilded or tinned to make them shiny.  Since the officers supplied this non standard  equipment the implication here was that it was very expensive.  The average ranker in the Principate could not hope to afford it.   Even the Praetorians had to make do with normal armor, though they seemed to retain their helmet plumes. (Suetonius Lives, Plutarch, Otho)     
     
    Q. Fabius Maximus
    Pref. Leg.
    Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71198 From: Cato Date: 2009-10-19
    Subject: a.d. XIV Kal. Nov.
    Cato omnibus in Foro SPD

    Salvete omnes!

    Hodiernus dies est ante diem XIV Kalendas Novembris; haec dies nefastus publicus est.

    "There was a universal shout of approval, and T. Quinctius advancing
    to the front asserted that his men would submit to the authority of
    the Dictator. He implored Valerius to take up the cause of his unhappy
    fellow-citizens, and when he had taken it up to maintain it with the
    same integrity that he had always shown in his public administration.
    For himself he demanded no conditions, he would not place his hope in
    anything but his innocence, but for the soldiers there must be the
    same guarantee that was given in the days of their fathers to the
    plebs and afterwards to the legions, namely, that no man should be
    punished for having taken part in the secession. The Dictator
    expressed his approval of what had been said, and after telling them
    all to hope for the best he galloped back to the City, and after
    obtaining the consent of the senate, brought a measure before the
    people who were assembled in the Petilian Grove granting immunity to
    all who had taken part in the secession. He then begged the Quirites
    to grant him one request, which was that no one should ever either in
    jest or earnest bring that matter up against any one. A military Lex
    Sacrata was also passed, enacting that no soldier's name should be
    struck off the muster-roll without his consent. An additional
    provision was subsequently embodied in it, forbidding any one who had
    once been military tribune from being made to serve afterwards as a
    centurion. This was in consequence of a demand made by the mutineers
    with respect to P. Salonius, who had been every year either military
    tribune or centurion of the first class. They were incensed against
    him because he had always opposed their mutinous projects and had fled
    from Lautulae to avoid being mixed up with them. As this proposal was
    aimed solely at Salonius the senate refused to allow it. Then Salonius
    himself appealed to the senators not to consider his dignity of more
    importance than the harmony of the State, and at his request they
    ultimately passed it. Another demand just as impudent was that the pay
    of the cavalry should be reduced-at that time they were receiving
    three times the infantry pay-because they had acted against the
    mutineers." - Livy, History of Rome 7.41


    "In the fifth year of the reign of Tatius, some retainers and kinsmen
    of his, falling in with ambassadors from Laurentum on their way to
    Rome, attempted to rob them of their money,Link to the editor's note
    at the bottom of this page and when they would not stand and deliver,
    slew them. It was a bold and dreadful crime, and Romulus thought its
    perpetrators ought to be punished at once, but Tatius tried to put off
    and turn aside the course of justice. This was the sole occasion of
    open variance between them; in all other matters they acted in the
    utmost concert and administered affairs with unanimity. The friends of
    the slain ambassadors, shut out as they were from all lawful redress,
    through the efforts of Tatius, fell upon him as he was sacrificing
    with Romulus at Lavinium, and killed him, but escorted Romulus on his
    way with loud praises of his justice. Romulus brought the body of
    Tatius home and gave it honourable burial, and it lies near the
    so-called Armilustrium, on the Aventine hill; but he took no steps
    whatsoever to bring his murderers to justice. And some historians
    write that the city of Laurentum, in terror, delivered up the
    murderers of Tatius, but that Romulus let them go, saying that murder
    had been requited with murder. This led some to say and suspect that
    he was glad to be rid of his colleague, but it caused no disturbance
    in the government, nor did it lead the Sabines into faction, nay, some
    through the good-will they had for him, others through fear of his
    power, and others because they regarded him as a benevolent god, all
    continued to hold him in reverence to the end." - Plutarch, Parallel
    Lives, "Romulus" 23

    "Armilustrium ab eo quod in Armilustrio armati sacra faciunt, nisi
    locus potius dictus ab his; sed quod de his prius, id ab ludendo aut
    lustro, id est quod circumibant ludentes ancilibus armati." - Varro,
    de Lingua Latina VI.3

    "Before the consuls set out, the nine days' sacred rite was performed,
    as a shower of stones had fallen from the sky at Veii. After the
    mention of one prodigy, others also were reported, as usual. At
    Minturnae, that the temple of Jupiter and the grove of Marica, and at
    Atella also that a wall and gate, had been struck by lightning. The
    people of Minturnae added what was more alarming, that a stream of
    blood had flowed at their gate. At Capua, a wolf, which had entered at
    the gate by night, had torn a watchman. These prodigies were expiated
    with victims of the larger kind, and a supplication for one day was
    made, according to a decree of the pontiffs. The nine days' sacred
    rite was then performed again, because a shower of stones had been
    seen to fall in the armilustrum." - Livy, History of Rome 27.37


    Today is the celebration of the Armilustrium. The Armilustrium was a
    festival in honor of Mars, the god of war. On this day the weapons of
    the soldiers were ritually purified and stored for winter. The army
    would be assembled and reviewed in the Circus Maximus, garlanded with
    flowers and the trumpets (tubae) would be played as part of the
    purification rites. The Romans gathered with their arms and armour on
    the Aventine Hill, and held a procession with torches and sacrificial
    animals. The dancing priests of Mars known as the Salii may also have
    taken part in the ceremony.

    As seen in the quotations from Livy and Plutarch above, the
    Armilustrium was also the name of a large open space on the Aventine
    Hill where the festival was held.

    Valete bene!

    Cato
    Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71199 From: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com Date: 2009-10-19
    Subject: Posting rules in this Forum, 10/19/2009, 11:45 pm
    Reminder from:   Nova-Roma Yahoo! Group
     
    Title:   Posting rules in this Forum
     
    Date:   Monday October 19, 2009
    Time:   11:45 pm - 12:00 am
    Repeats:   This event repeats every week until Friday January 1, 2010.
    Location:   Rome
    Notes:   Praetores omnibus s.d.

    Please keep on mind the posting rules defined in the current Edictum de sermone Apr. 24, 2762 GEM-PMA, that you find in the Files section of this Forum, at:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma/files/Edicta%20de%20sermone/

    Valete omnes,


    Praetores G.E.Marinus and P.M.Albucius
     
    Copyright © 2009  Yahoo! Inc. All Rights Reserved | Terms of Service | Privacy Policy
    Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71200 From: Cn. Cornelius Lentulus Date: 2009-10-20
    Subject: R: [Nova-Roma] Resignation
    Cn. Lentulus M. Potito s. p. d.

    SVBEEQV

    I am very sad you decided to resign from your citizenship, M. Valeri Potite! Even though we had different viewpoints in my political questions, I considered you a good citizen and a good Roman: and I dare to say, a friend in Nova Roma.

    Send my greetings to Cn. Caelius, another great loss of ours, and be well!

    I hope one day you'll return.

    De te incolumem custodiant!
    Cura, ut valeas semper et optime!
    Vivat Nova Roma et Oppidum Fluminis Gilae!





    --- Sab 17/10/09, Steve Moore <astrobear@...> ha scritto:

    Da: Steve Moore <astrobear@...>
    Oggetto: [Nova-Roma] Resignation
    A: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, BackAlley@yahoogroups.com
    Cc: "'Timothy or Stephen Gallagher'" <spqr753@...>
    Data: Sabato 17 ottobre 2009, 08:50

     

    M. Valerius Potitus omnibus SPD.

     

    I hereby resign my citizenship and my offices. This resignation takes effect at 09:00 CEST ( Rome time) on Oct. 17, 2009.

     

    Steve Moore


    __________________________________________________
    Do You Yahoo!?
    Poco spazio e tanto spam? Yahoo! Mail ti protegge dallo spam e ti da tanto spazio gratuito per i tuoi file e i messaggi
    http://mail.yahoo.it
    Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71201 From: Cn. Cornelius Lentulus Date: 2009-10-20
    Subject: Maria Caeca For Quaestor!
    Cn. Lentulus pontifex C. Mariae Caecae quaestrici candidatae s. p. d.

    What a wonderful news!

    Quirites, I recommend you C. Maria Caeca as your Quaestrix, as I know her is full of public virtues, dutifulness, constance, good will and balance.

    She is an exemplary citizen of Nova Roma, and one who truly deserves your votes.

    Good day for our republic, to see her candidacy, and even better to us if elected, to publicly benefitting from her services for the state.

    C. MARIAM CAECAM QVAESTRICEM REI PVLICAE O. V. F.


    Cn. Cornelius Lentulus, pontifex, saceros Concordiae
    magister aranearius
    legatus pro praetore Pannoniae
    accesus, scriba






    --- Sab 17/10/09, Shoshana Hathaway <shoshanahathaway@...> ha scritto:

    Da: Shoshana Hathaway <shoshanahathaway@...>
    Oggetto: [Nova-Roma] announcement of dandidacy
    A: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
    Cc: "Shoshana Hathaway" <SHOSHANAHATHAWAY@...>
    Data: Sabato 17 ottobre 2009, 06:32

     

    Salve Omnes,

    I hereby announce my candidacy for the position of Quaestor in the upcoming
    election. I meet all specified requirements, and, as those who know me can
    attest, I am profoundly interested in the well being of our Res Publica, and
    willing to expend time in effort in her service.

    Vale Optime,
    C. Maria Caeca


    Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71202 From: Cato Date: 2009-10-20
    Subject: a.d XIII Kal. Nov.
    Cato omnibus in Foro SPD

    Salvete omnes!

    Hodie est ante diem XIII Kalendas Novembris; hic dies comitialis est.

    "In addition to these measures I find the following recorded by
    various authorities. L. Genucius, a tribune of the plebs, brought
    before them a measure declaring usury illegal, whilst other
    resolutions were adopted forbidding any one to accept re-election to
    the same office in less than ten years or fill two offices in the same
    year, and also that both consuls might legally be elected from the
    plebs. If all these concessions were really made it is quite clear
    that the revolt possessed considerable strength. In other annalists it
    is stated that Valerius was not nominated Dictator, but the matter was
    entirely arranged by the consuls; also that it was not before they
    came to Rome but in Rome itself that the body of conspirators broke
    out into armed revolt; also that it was not to T. Quinctius' farm but
    to the house of C. Manlius that the nocturnal visit was paid, and that
    it was Manlius who was seized by the conspirators and made their
    leader, after which they marched out to a distance of four miles and
    entrenched themselves; also that it was not their leaders who made the
    first suggestions of concord, but what happened was that as the two
    armies advanced towards each other prepared for action the soldiers
    exchanged mutual greetings, and as they drew nearer grasped each
    other's hands and embraced one another, and the consuls, seeing how
    averse the soldiers were from fighting, yielded to circumstances and
    made proposals to the senate for reconciliation and concord. Thus the
    ancient authorities agree in nothing but the simple fact that there
    was a mutiny and that it was suppressed. The report of this
    disturbance and the seriousness of the war which had been commenced
    with the Samnites made many nationalities averse from an alliance with
    Rome. The Latins had long been faithless to their treaty, and in
    addition to that the Privernates made a sudden incursion and
    devastated the neighbouring Roman colonies of Norba and Setia.' -
    Livy, History of Rome 7.42



    ROMAN REPUBLICAN TERMS - REX SACRORUM

    "He next gave his attention to the affairs of religion. Certain public
    functions had hitherto been executed by the kings in person; with the
    view of supplying their place a "king for sacrifices" was created, and
    lest he should become king in anything more than name, and so threaten
    that liberty which was their first care, his office was made
    subordinate to the Pontifex Maximus." - Livy, History of Rome 2.2

    "But to the end that the name, too, of the kingly power, which is
    traditional with us and made its way into our commonwealth with
    favourable auguries that manifested the approbation of the gods, may
    be preserved for form's sake, let there always be appointed a king of
    sacred rites, who shall enjoy the honour for life exempt from all
    military and civil duties and, like the "king" at Athens, exercising
    this single function, the superintendence of the sacrifices, and no
    other." - Dionysius of Halicarnassus, Roman Antiquities 74.4

    "Is it because in early times the kings performed greater part of the
    most important rites, and themselves offered the sacrifices with the
    assistance of the priests? But when they did not practise moderation,
    but were arrogant and oppressive, most of the Greek states took away
    their authority, and left to them only the offering of the sacrifice
    to the gods; but the Romans expelled their kings altogether, and to
    offer the sacrifices they appointed another, whom they did not allow
    to hold office or to address the people, so that in their sacred rites
    only they might seem to be subject to a king, and to tolerate a
    kingship only on the gods' account." - Plutarch, The Roman Questions 63

    When the Roman Republic overthrew the Roman Kingdom in 510 BC, the
    notion persisted that a king of Rome had to be installed in order to
    perform certain rituals that the king of Rome traditionally presided
    over. The Romans therefore appointed a rex sacrorum, literally king of
    the sacred rites, in order to discharge the religious duties of the
    king. The rex sacrorum was, of course, a patrician, appointed to the
    priesthood for life by the pontifex maximus. In theory and in social
    precedence, the rex sacrorum was the highest ranking priest in the
    Roman religion, in practice his influence was far less than that of
    the pontifex maximus. He was exempt from all civilian or military
    duties; he wielded no civil or military influence. Because of this,
    the office was never coveted by the plebeians, and remained a
    patrician monopoly until it was abolished during the reign of
    Theodosius I in 390 AD. His wife, also, was a priest, and she became
    known as the regina sacrorum, "queen of the sacred rites."

    The rex sacrorum and regina sacrorum presided over a sacrifice that
    was offered several times a month, on the Ides, Nones, and Kalends of
    the Roman calendar; he to Jupiter, she to Juno. He also played an
    important role in the yearly religious ritual of the Regifugium, which
    commemorated the expulsion of the last king from Rome. The rex
    sacrorum was also charged with the duty of placating the gods on
    behalf of the Roman state when evil omens were discerned.

    Another Roman priest given the title of "king" was the rex Nemorensis,
    an escaped slave who was priest of Diana at Nemi, and who attained his
    position of uneasy honour by killing the previous incumbent of his
    priesthood, after showing his worthiness by plucking a bough from a
    sacred tree.

    A thought from Cato the Elder:

    "But it is our duty, my young friends, to resist old age; to compensate for its defects by a watchful care; to fight against it as we would fight against disease; to adopt a regimen of health; to practise moderate exercise; and to take just enough of food and drink to restore our strength and not to overburden it. Nor, indeed, are we to give our attention solely to the body; much greater care is due to the mind and soul; for they, too, like lamps, grow dim with time, unless we keep them supplied with oil. Moreover, exercise causes the body to become heavy with fatigue, but intellectual activity gives buoyancy to the mind. For when Caecilius speaks of 'the old fools of the comic stage,' he has in mind old men characterized by credulity, forgetfulness, and carelessness, which are faults, not of old age generally, but only of an old age that is drowsy, slothful, and inert. Just as waywardness and lust are more often found in the young man than in the old, yet not in all who are young, but only in those naturally base; so that senile debility, usually called 'dotage,' is a characteristic, not of all old men, but only of those who are weak in mind and will." - Cicero, "Cato Maior De Senectute" ("Cato the Elder On Old Age") XI.31-36


    Valete bene!

    Cato
    Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71203 From: C. Curius Saturninus Date: 2009-10-20
    Subject: Call for contributors and volunteers for a project about Roman Gods
    Salvete omnes,

    This is a call for contributors and volunteers for a project about Roman Gods and mythology, Di immortales.

    Project description
    The Di immortales is a collaborative movie production project arranged at Wreckamovie.com collaboration platform. Anyone and everyone is invited to take part into production. The aim of the project is to produce certain number of short movies that make Roman Gods and mythology alive to modern audiences, to make them meaningful and to make them to touch people of our time. The aim is not to produce a series of scientific documentaries. The stories can be dramatizations of classic stories or they can be something else. We are aiming to do what Romans would have done in our time to tell meaningful stories about Roman Gods to modern audiences. To move, to teach and to please.

    Project organization
    Project is lead by mr. Mikko Sillanpää, who in Nova Roma is known as C. Curius Saturninus. No other nominations are made public at this stage. The project collaborative part is carried out at Wreckamovie.com platform: http://www.wreckamovie.com/diimmortales

    Project schedule
    Broad schedule is to have outline and first version for the scripts of the short films ready at the December 2010. During 2010 the project will start producing first marketing materials and look for financing and production partners.

    As this is not a Nova Roman project, I ask everyone to use the Wreckamovie.com pages as place for discussion about this project: http://www.wreckamovie.com/diimmortales

    Also naturally I'm available privately for any questions, contributions or ideas you may have.

    Valete,

    C. Curius Saturninus
    (Mikko Sillanpää)

    Rector Academia Thules ad Studia Romana Antiqua et Nova
    Senator - Legatus Pro Praetore Provinciae Thules

    e-mail: c.curius@...
    www.academiathules.org
    thule.novaroma.org

    Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71204 From: luciaiuliaaquila Date: 2009-10-20
    Subject: Invitation to Temple Of Venus et Dedication!
    Salvéte, amícae et amící omnibusque!

    You are cordially invited to attend the Temple of Venus Festival Dedication Reception on Sunday afternoon, 25Oct2009, at 2pm in Nashville, TN; for more details and to RSVP:
    http://www.meetup.com/Temple-Of-Venus/calendar/11148360/

    Aedes Venus Genetrix: the Temple of Venus is a sanctuary blending the ancient with the modern for those with different or alternative beliefs, providing activities, assistance and community outreach covering topics, and offering various workshops on ritual & ceremony, herbs, healing, education, arts, food, drink, mysticism, metaphysics, ancient/classical traditions, interpersonal relationships, tantra, intimacy, family , children and society, history, archeology, anthropology and pleasurable social activities.

    In addition to the Reception we have scheduled on Nov 8th a Workshop: Ancient Herbs/Oils for Health and Beauty Pt I.
    Also scheduled on December 19th a Holiday Feast: "Io, Saturnalia!" Saturnalia Festival & Opalia

    Our gatherings are a coming together of sacred human beings as a community engaging in, and seeking knowledge of, activities and topics that interest them as they did in ancient times at a central space, the Temple.

    Won't you please join us, we would be honored.
    http://www.meetup.com/Temple-Of-Venus/calendar/11148360/

    Cúráte ut valéatis atque di vos incolumes custodiant!

    In amicitia,

    L. Iulia Aquila

    P.S. Those who do not live close are welcome to join TOV and participate online, please feel free to contribute, educate and enlighten!
    Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71205 From: C.Maria Caeca Date: 2009-10-20
    Subject: test, sorry!
    I'm testing to see if this goes through ...or not. Sorry to do this, but
    ...

    C. Maria Caeca
    Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71206 From: Charlie Collins Date: 2009-10-20
    Subject: Re: test, sorry!
    Salve,

    It came through OK.

    Vale,
    Quintus Servilius Priscus


    On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 5:44 PM, C.Maria Caeca <c.mariacaeca@...> wrote:
    > I'm testing to see if this goes through ...or not.  Sorry to do this, but
    > ...
    >
    > C. Maria Caeca
    >
    >
    >
    > ------------------------------------
    >
    > Yahoo! Groups Links
    >
    >
    >
    >



    --
    "TANSTAAFL"
    Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71207 From: C.Maria Caeca Date: 2009-10-20
    Subject: Re: test, sorry!
    
     Gratias tibi ago!  I actually did something cyberly that *worked* the way I wanted and expected it to. Whew!
     
    Caeca, off in 7 different directions!  
    Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71208 From: Publius Ullerius Stephanus Venator Date: 2009-10-20
    Subject: Re: test, sorry!
    Salve Caeca...

    On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 5:44 PM, C.Maria Caeca scripsit:
    >
    > I'm testing to see if this goes through ...or not. Sorry to do this, but
    > ...
    >
    > C. Maria Caeca
    >

    No, it didn't... ,-)

    Vale - Venii
    Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71209 From: Publius Ullerius Stephanus Venator Date: 2009-10-20
    Subject: Another Latin Phrase of the Day
    Salvete Omnes;

    Vita enim mortuorum in memoria vivorum est posita.
    (The life of the dead is placed in the memory of the living.)
    - Marcus Tullius Cicero

    ===========================
    In amicitia et fide
    Publius Ullerius Stephanus Venator

    Cattle die and kinsmen die.
    You, yourself, soon will die.
    But bright, fair, fame,
    And an honored name,
    Will live forevermore...
    "The Havamal"
    Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71210 From: C.Maria Caeca Date: 2009-10-20
    Subject: Re: Maria Caeca For Quaestor!
    Caeca Lentulo Sal,
     
    Thank you for your very kind endorsement, Amice!  I am delighted, as a candidate, and I am deeply touched to read these gracious words from you.  As you know, I esteem you greatly and value you friendship dearly, so praise from you is precious, whatever the results of this, or any, election.
     
    Vale Optime,
    C. Maria Caeca
    Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71211 From: A. Sempronius Regulus Date: 2009-10-20
    Subject: Re: Ancient Roman Shade
    Salvete omnes,
    I am back from some family business in Iowa. We have a beef farm up there and it is an old German (Swabian) settlement. We have a north, south, east, and west farmstead. The latter is rented out to Amish in exchange for labor and oversight around the larger farm. The north farmstead has a ghost. When it appears, it descends stairs to occupy a spot in front of the fireplace in the ground-floor formal living room/reception room (the family room being a separate room). When the ghost occupies the spot, it is stone freezing cold. It is cold with a roaring fire in the fireplace three feet away. It is cold with a space heater put into the middle of the spot. The family did have a geologist and others come study if it was a seasonal and/or natural phenomenon. The results could not explain it. Humans and animals feel the cold but mechanical and chemical means do not detect it. Dogs and cats detect something but instruments do not.
     
    Valete,
    A. Sempronius Regulus 

    --- On Fri, 10/16/09, luciaiuliaaquila <dis_pensible@...> wrote:

    From: luciaiuliaaquila <dis_pensible@...>
    Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Ancient Roman Shade
    To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
    Date: Friday, October 16, 2009, 1:43 AM

     
    Salve Livia,
    Livia: >maybe they should publicize the ghost instead of trying to chase it out. In
    >other places in Rumania there are Dracula tours, and they can have a "ghost
    >tour

    Sabine told us the Hotel is in disrepair and closed so maybe a superstitious mindset came into play and the owner abandoned it. The article is from a year old. If he had publicized the shade then he might have a successful hotel today. I just finished looking over the photos; I want to go...badly.. . To reiterate what Sabine told us, it now known as the Hotel Decebal of Herculane and was "the former Franz Josef Hotel where the Emperor Franz Josef's wife, Elisabeth of Bavaria, well known as Sisi enjoyed the Hotel and spa."
    Here are some more Photos:
    http://www.panorami o.com/photo/ 24432899
    http://www.flickr. com/photos/ 39370239@ N03/page3/
    I think I want to go live and die in Herculane. I'd live in the Hotel even.

    Here's some more info:
    The Hotel Decebal in Herculane has become a local attraction after a photograph of a ghost was published by newspapers and television.
    The ghost of a tall woman in a long white dress reportedly watches the hallways and staircases of the Decebal hotel, in the Baile Herculane mountain spa. The 150-year-old hotel is believed to hide ancient Roman treasure under its foundations and the ghost is said by locals to keep treasure hunters away. The hotel has been closed for renovations for five years but people who have ventured inside claim to have seen - and photographed - the ghost. Victoria Iovan, 33, from Baile Herculane, said: "I photographed my boyfriend in the hotel. Back home I was shocked to see another woman's shadow in the picture. She looked like a priestess in long white clothes."
    Another witness, a high school student called Alexandra, said he and six classmates went into the hotel late one evening for fun. "All of a sudden we felt a cold air and we saw a white silhouette close to us. We couldn't find our way out because we ran so fast," he said.
    Local authorities have warned people not to go into the hotel because they say it is unsafe because of the building work.

    I am a bit skeptical though and would need more than the one available photo. However, and I am surprised no one already mentioned this, if the area truly is haunted I am wondering if the "haunting" and the "bad luck" of the owner is due to improper burial or not paying reverence to the shade during Dies Parentales.
    For discussion sake, let's say the shade exists and she is Roman, of the Religio. Then one would have to determine why it is in this state and why it stays at the location. Some research into the area to find out who she was, when she died, under what circumstances, what the shade's personal beliefs are etc.
    If it truly is a guardian, a deified formerly alive being or a minor deity than there is no reason to go any further and the appropriate reverence should be paid – and possibly publicize it if there are auspicious signs.
    If she was, for example, murdered because of religious persecution that is another matter entirely. If the shade is bound against its will then the shade should be assisted to complete its transition – maybe to the Blessed Isles to reside in the Garden of Venus. A proper funerary ritual performed by an adopted son might work.
    At any rate a parentatio should be performed.
    There is also an exorcism done to get rid of unhappy or evil spirits – the owner, head of household, or designee would walk barefoot through the dwelling throwing black beans over his shoulder repeating incantations x9 and those attending would clash pots while repeating more incantations x9.

    I just think it is a cool story.

    Vale,

    Julia

    --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com, "livia_plauta" <livia.plauta@ ...> wrote:
    >
    > Salve Julia,
    > maybe they should publicize the ghost instead of trying to chase it out. In other places in Rumania there are Dracula tours, and they can have a "ghost tour".
    >
    > Vale,
    > Livia
    > >
    > >
    > > http://www.sott. net/articles/ show/176522- Romania-Hotel- to-hire-medium- to\
    > > -deal-with-resident -ghost
    > > <http://www.sott. net/articles/ show/176522- Romania-Hotel- to-hire-medium- t\
    > > o-deal-with- resident- ghost>
    > >
    > > Photo: http://www.flickr. com/photos/ l_j_a/4010062926 /
    > > <http://www.flickr. com/photos/ l_j_a/4010062926 />
    > >
    > > A hotel in Romania recently became a site of interest for ghost hunters
    > > after a local photographed what appears to be a female spirit standing
    > > above its lobby stairwell. The hotel, named the Decebal, is situated in
    > > the mountain spa resort of Baile Herculane.
    > >
    > > Local, Victorian Loval aged 33 and her boyfriend snuck inside the hotel
    > > which has been closed for five years for renovations. While inside she
    > > snapped the photo, but only saw the ghost later, when she developed the
    > > film. The hotel is said to stand on an ancient Roman ruin and the ghost
    > > appears to be wearing the white robe of an ancient Roman priestess.
    > >
    > > Some have dismissed the photo as an illusion caused by irregular
    > > stonework in the lobby however others have been in the hotel since the
    > > event and swear that they saw the ghost. One group of students fled the
    > > building in fear after being confronted by the apparent spirit. Another
    > > man called a friend from inside the lobby in a panic after claiming to
    > > have seen its ghostly resident. Some have commented that she might be
    > > guarding something of ancient importance.
    > >
    > > Now it appears that the owner of the site is worried that this
    > > non-paying resident might be bad for business when the establishment
    > > re-opens. It is being reported in the Romanian press that the hotel
    > > management is planning to bring out a medium to make contact and ask the
    > > spirit why she remains and on what conditions she might 'check-out'.
    > >
    >


    Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71212 From: A. Sempronius Regulus Date: 2009-10-20
    Subject: Re: More on the Hypatia movie
    Salve,
    I'm watching this closely too -- with great anticipation. As part of that anticipation, I actually paid attention to an advance notice from Cambridge University Press about their newly revised volume in the history of late ancientt philosophy. It is a vast improvement over their already excellent earlier edition. This one includes a chapter for each individual late Neoplatonist figure (before they were lumped together). I will be adding this title to the Wiki Philosophy Reading List.
    Vale,
    A. Sempronius Regulus 

    --- On Sat, 10/17/09, Maxima Valeria Messallina <maximavaleriamessallina@...> wrote:

    From: Maxima Valeria Messallina <maximavaleriamessallina@...>
    Subject: [Nova-Roma] More on the Hypatia movie
    To: ReligioRomana@yahoogroups.com, Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
    Date: Saturday, October 17, 2009, 1:29 PM

     
    There has been some discussion on these lists on Alejandro Amenabar's upcoming movie, "Agora', about Hypatia of Alexandria. I visited the official site for the film and if you have not taken a look at this site, I urge you to do so. 
    For starters, there is a different trailer than the one playing on You Tube. You can view it at the intro or it is the first one on the videos section. The second video offered there is the same as the You Tube one.
    I loved the starry background and the swirling planets as each section loads up. Very clever. My favorite is the Characters section, where you can read about the main characters of the film which includes comments from Amenabar and the actors themselves. I almost fell off my chair to read that Rachel Weisz had never heard of Hypatia beforehand! Obviously, there is a need for this film, if for nothing more than to acquaint the general public with this brilliant woman. 
    It was released in Spain last Friday, but I have found two conflicting release dates for the movie in the USA: either December 18 or 23.
     
     
    Maxima Valeria Messallina


    __________________________________________________
    Do You Yahoo!?
    Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
    http://mail.yahoo.com
    Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71213 From: A. Sempronius Regulus Date: 2009-10-20
    Subject: Sigh -- Smile And Economics of late paganism/Xtianism
    Salvete omnes,
    Coming back, I found a flood of emails to the main list that suggested Nova Roma had heavy rains that flooded the sewers and catacombs which brought the rats and other refuse out. So I sort of felt - sigh.
     
    Then I saw, after years in intelligence one knows how to be legally an unsubscribed party to lists and private email circulations, that the BA gang is just uselessly pumping themselves up -- run Maximus for whatever, Tribune? (too bad about Graecus), that there is really no threat from them. They couldn't plan a mutual grope on a beach in broad daylight.
     
    Steve Moore resignation: well, a loss to the extent he was pagan, a gain to the extent he was part of the Cato-Sulla camp.
     
    I had a chance to visit some old friends and colleagues out in San Francisco at SFSU. I know this will make Graecus uncomfortable since he hates what he calls "European Anti-Americanism" (especially, the French criticizing the US) as well as the former citizen Poplicola who is apparently struggling along in classics at SFSU, because some of those classics professors are Marxists. I will be posting a research question, a Marxist or shall we say economic question about the rise of Christianity and the demise of paganism in a couple of days that my friends out their raised. Well, here is the gist now: hypothesis - the empire had sagging income, high unpaid taxes, and very expensive public pagan rites at state expense; pagan temples filled with treasure; a Christian church with organization and money; killing state support for paganism, robbing the pagan temples of treasure, and supporting a rich church for income was the economic motive of the empire to suppress paganism. Question: if true, is there a means to calculate the estimated wealth of pagan temples, the costs of public rituals, and wealth of the Christian church? If so, is there a means to determine how much Christian basilicas cost and who paid for it? The surmise is the empire would not have paid for it if it was not a good investment.
     
    Valete,
    A. Sempronius Regulus

    __________________________________________________
    Do You Yahoo!?
    Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
    http://mail.yahoo.com
    Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71214 From: A. Sempronius Regulus Date: 2009-10-20
    Subject: Re: Sigh -- Smile And Economics of late paganism/Xtianism
    PS, don't let the mention of "Marxist" throw you as it already apparently has a couple (I still can't figure out the motivation of some in the BA to be willing to allow it to be caused in each other skid marks in their tighty whities), it is a mode of analysis -- basically, follow the money trail and who is getting cheated by whom. There are just professors that still identify as such but that means they look at history in terms of economic motives. I am not proposing a revival of a regime like the USSR and Warsaw Pact that I spent a good many years fighting against. ASR  

    --- On Wed, 10/21/09, A. Sempronius Regulus <asempronius.regulus@...> wrote:

    From: A. Sempronius Regulus <asempronius.regulus@...>
    Subject: [Nova-Roma] Sigh -- Smile And Economics of late paganism/Xtianism
    To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
    Date: Wednesday, October 21, 2009, 2:56 AM

     
    Salvete omnes,
    Coming back, I found a flood of emails to the main list that suggested Nova Roma had heavy rains that flooded the sewers and catacombs which brought the rats and other refuse out. So I sort of felt - sigh.
     
    Then I saw, after years in intelligence one knows how to be legally an unsubscribed party to lists and private email circulations, that the BA gang is just uselessly pumping themselves up -- run Maximus for whatever, Tribune? (too bad about Graecus), that there is really no threat from them. They couldn't plan a mutual grope on a beach in broad daylight.
     
    Steve Moore resignation: well, a loss to the extent he was pagan, a gain to the extent he was part of the Cato-Sulla camp.
     
    I had a chance to visit some old friends and colleagues out in San Francisco at SFSU. I know this will make Graecus uncomfortable since he hates what he calls "European Anti-Americanism" (especially, the French criticizing the US) as well as the former citizen Poplicola who is apparently struggling along in classics at SFSU, because some of those classics professors are Marxists. I will be posting a research question, a Marxist or shall we say economic question about the rise of Christianity and the demise of paganism in a couple of days that my friends out their raised. Well, here is the gist now: hypothesis - the empire had sagging income, high unpaid taxes, and very expensive public pagan rites at state expense; pagan temples filled with treasure; a Christian church with organization and money; killing state support for paganism, robbing the pagan temples of treasure, and supporting a rich church for income was the economic motive of the empire to suppress paganism. Question: if true, is there a means to calculate the estimated wealth of pagan temples, the costs of public rituals, and wealth of the Christian church? If so, is there a means to determine how much Christian basilicas cost and who paid for it? The surmise is the empire would not have paid for it if it was not a good investment.
     
    Valete,
    A. Sempronius Regulus

    ____________ _________ _________ _________ _________ __
    Do You Yahoo!?
    Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
    http://mail. yahoo.com

    Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71215 From: C.Maria Caeca Date: 2009-10-20
    Subject: Re: Sigh -- Smile And Economics of late paganism/Xtianism
    Caeca Regulo sal,
     
    I'm no expert, but somewhere I believe I read (no, can't reference it, sorry) that, at least in some cases, individuals or families sponsored (paid for) public ceremonies and major ...um ..events of a religious nature. I suspect this was more a feature of the Republic and early Imperial period, but I wonder how much of the costs involved in public ritual were born by private individuals or groups, and whether, as time passed, that practice abated to the point that it caused a financial problem for the State?
     
    I'm also hoping that I'm not seeing my messages to the list as a result of new address moderation, and not because of my technical ineptitude.  If whoever is monitoring the list from the Praetorian (sp?) cohors is in a good mood, could you let me know if you, at least, are receiving them?  Not fussing, just ...unsure of my technical prowess. (well, I *am*, but you really *don't* want me to expound on *those* abilities, LOL!
     
    C. Maria Caeca
    Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71216 From: gualterus_graecus Date: 2009-10-21
    Subject: Re: Sigh -- Smile And Economics of late paganism/Xtianism
    Is there a reason you're trying to bait me? And what's the point of even mentioning Poplicola if he hasn't been part of the org for a while now? I'm increasingly finding your attitude quite childish.

    -Gualterus

    --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "A. Sempronius Regulus" <asempronius.regulus@...> wrote:
    >
    > Salvete omnes,
    > Coming back, I found a flood of emails to the main list that suggested Nova Roma had heavy rains that flooded the sewers and catacombs which brought the rats and other refuse out. So I sort of felt - sigh.
    >  
    > Then I saw, after years in intelligence one knows how to be legally an unsubscribed party to lists and private email circulations, that the BA gang is just uselessly pumping themselves up -- run Maximus for whatever, Tribune? (too bad about Graecus), that there is really no threat from them. They couldn't plan a mutual grope on a beach in broad daylight.
    >  
    > Steve Moore resignation: well, a loss to the extent he was pagan, a gain to the extent he was part of the Cato-Sulla camp.
    >  
    > I had a chance to visit some old friends and colleagues out in San Francisco at SFSU. I know this will make Graecus uncomfortable since he hates what he calls "European Anti-Americanism" (especially, the French criticizing the US) as well as the former citizen Poplicola who is apparently struggling along in classics at SFSU, because some of those classics professors are Marxists. I will be posting a research question, a Marxist or shall we say economic question about the rise of Christianity and the demise of paganism in a couple of days that my friends out their raised. Well, here is the gist now: hypothesis - the empire had sagging income, high unpaid taxes, and very expensive public pagan rites at state expense; pagan temples filled with treasure; a Christian church with organization and money; killing state support for paganism, robbing the pagan temples of treasure, and supporting a rich church for income was the economic motive of the empire to
    > suppress paganism. Question: if true, is there a means to calculate the estimated wealth of pagan temples, the costs of public rituals, and wealth of the Christian church? If so, is there a means to determine how much Christian basilicas cost and who paid for it? The surmise is the empire would not have paid for it if it was not a good investment.
    >  
    > Valete,
    > A. Sempronius Regulus
    >
    > __________________________________________________
    > Do You Yahoo!?
    > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
    > http://mail.yahoo.com
    >
    Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71217 From: Cato Date: 2009-10-21
    Subject: a.d. XII Kal. Nov.
    Cato omnibus in foro SPD

    Salvete omnes!

    Hodie est ante diem XII Kalendas Novembris; hic dies comitialis est.

    "When messengers from Setia and Norba arrived in Rome with complaints
    of a defeat they had suffered at the hands of the revolted
    Privernates, the consulship was held by C. Plautius (for the second
    time) and L. Aemilius Mamercus. News was also brought that an army of
    Volscians led by the people of Antium had concentrated at Satricum.
    Both wars fell to Plautius. He marched first to Privernum and at once
    engaged the enemy who were defeated without much trouble The town was
    captured and then given back to the Privernates after a strong
    garrison had been placed in it; two-thirds of their territory was
    confiscated. Then the victorious army was led against the Antiates at
    Satricum. There a battle was fought with terrible bloodshed on both
    sides, and whilst the result was still uncertain night separated the
    combatants. The Romans were in no way discouraged by the
    indecisiveness of the conflict, and prepared for battle the next day.
    The Volscians, after reckoning up their losses in the battles, were by
    no means eager to run any further risk; looking upon themselves as
    defeated, they made a hurried departure to Antium in the night,
    leaving their wounded and a part of their baggage behind. An immense
    quantity of arms was found both amongst the dead on the field and in
    the camp. These the consul said he was offering to Lua Mater. He then
    ravaged the enemy's territories down to the sea-board. When the other
    consul entered the Sabellian territory, he found that the Samnites had
    no camp, no legions confronting him. Whilst he was laying waste to their
    fields with fire and sword, envoys came to him to ask for peace and he
    referred them to the senate. After permission had been given them to
    state their case, they laid aside their truculent manner and requested
    that peace might be granted them and also the right of making war
    against the Sidicines. They considered that they were the more
    justified in making this request because they had formed friendly
    relations with Rome when their affairs were prosperous, not as in the
    case of the Campanians when they were in adversity, and they were
    taking up arms against the Sidicines, who had always been their
    enemies and never friends of Rome, who had not, like the Samnites,
    sought its friendship in a time of peace, nor like the Campanians,
    asked for its help in a time of war, and who were not under the
    protection and suzerainty of Rome." - Livy, History of Rome 8.1


    "The festival of Artemis at Patrai begins with a most splendid
    procession in honor of Artemis, and the maiden officiating as
    priestess rides last in the procession upon a car yoked to deer ...
    the people throw alive upon the altar edible birds and every kind of
    victim as well; there are wild boars, deer and gazelles; some bring
    wolf-cubs or bear-cubs, others the full-grown beasts. They also place
    upon the altar fruit of cultivated trees. Next they set fire to the
    wood. At this point I have seen some of the beasts, including a bear,
    forcing their way outside at the first rush of the flames, some of
    them actually escaping by their strength. But those who threw them in
    drag them back again to the pyre. It is not remembered that anybody
    has ever been wounded by the beasts." - Pausanias, Guide to Greece 7.18.8

    The Greek bear goddess is Artemis, the daughter of Leto and Zeus, and
    the twin of Apollo. Artemis is the goddess of the wilderness, the hunt
    and wild animals, and fertility (she became a goddess of fertility and
    childbirth mainly in cities). She was often depicted with the crescent
    of the moon above her forehead and was sometimes identified with
    Selene (goddess of the moon). Artemis was one of the Olympians and a
    virgin goddess. Her main vocation was to roam mountain forests and
    uncultivated land with her nymphs in attendance hunting for lions,
    panthers, hinds and stags. Contradictory to the latter, she helped in
    protecting and seeing to their well-being, also their safety and
    reproduction. She was armed with a bow and arrows which were made by
    Hephaestus and the Cyclopes.

    In one legend, Artemis was born one day before her brother Apollo. Her
    mother gave birth to her on the island of Ortygia, then, almost
    immediately after her birth, she helped her mother to cross the
    straits over to Delos, where she then delivered Apollo. This was the
    beginning of her role as guardian of young children and patron of
    women in childbirth. Being a goddess of contradictions, she was the
    protectress of women in labor, but it was said that the arrows of
    Artemis brought them sudden death while giving birth. As was her
    brother, Apollo, Artemis was a divinity of healing, but also brought
    and spread diseases such as leprosy, rabies and even gout.

    Being associated with chastity, Artemis at an early age (in one legend
    she was three years old) asked her father, the great god Zeus, to
    grant her eternal virginity. Also, all her companions were virgins.
    Artemis was very protective of her purity, and gave grave punishment
    to any man who attempted to dishonor her in any form. Actaeon, while
    out hunting, accidentally came upon Artemis and her nymphs, who
    bathing naked in a secluded pool. Seeing them in all their naked
    beauty, the stunned Actaeon stopped and gazed at them, but when
    Artemis saw him ogling them, she transformed him into a stag. Then,
    incensed with disgust, she set his own hounds upon him. They chased
    and killed what they thought was another stag, but it was their
    master. As with Orion, a giant and a great hunter, there are several
    legends which tell of his death, one involving Artemis. It is said
    that he tried to rape the virgin goddess, so she killed him with her
    bow and arrows. Another says she conjured up a scorpion which killed
    Orion and his dog. Orion became a constellation in the night sky, and
    his dog became Sirius, the dog star. Yet another version says it was
    the scorpion which stung him and was transformed into the
    constellation with Orion, the later being Scorpio. Artemis was enraged
    when one of her nymphs, Callisto, allowed Zeus to seduce her, but the
    great god approached her in one of his guises; he came in the form of
    Artemis. The young nymph was unwittingly tricked, and she gave birth
    to Arcas, the ancestor of the Arcadians, but Artemis showed no mercy
    and changed her into a bear. She then shot and killed her. As Orion,
    she was sent up to the heavens, and became the constellation of the
    Great Bear (which is also known as the Plough).

    Artemis was very possessive. She would show her wrath on anyone who
    disobeyed her wishes, especially against her sacred animals. Even the
    great hero Agamemnon came upon the wrath of Artemis, when he killed a
    stag in her sacred grove. His punishment came when his ships were
    becalmed while he made his way to besiege Troy. With no winds to sail
    his ships he was told by the seer Calchas that the only way Artemis
    would bring back the winds was for him to sacrifice his daughter
    Iphigenia. Some versions say he did sacrifice Iphigenia, others that
    Artemis exchanged a deer in her place, and took Iphigenia to the land
    of the Tauri (the Crimea) as a priestess, to prepare strangers for
    sacrifice to Artemis.

    Artemis with her twin brother, Apollo, put to death the children of
    Niobe - Niobe, a mere mortal, had boasted to Leto, the mother of the divine twins, that she had bore more children, which must make her superior to Leto. Apollo being outraged at such an insult on his mother, informed Artemis. The twin gods hunted them down and shot them with their bows and arrows; Apollo killed the male children and Artemis the girls.

    Artemis was worshiped in most Greek cities but only as a secondary
    deity. However, to the Greeks in Asia Minor (modern day Turkey) she
    was a prominent deity. In Ephesus, a principal city of Asia Minor, a
    great temple was built in her honor, which became one of the "Seven
    Wonders of the Ancient World". But at Ephesus she was worshiped mainly
    as a fertility goddess, and was identified with Cybele the mother
    goddess of eastern lands. The cult statues of the Ephesian Artemis
    differ greatly from those of mainland Greece, whereas she is depicted
    as a huntress with her bow and arrows. Those found at Ephesus show her
    in the eastern style, standing erect with numerous nodes on her chest.
    There have been many theories as to what they represent. Some say they
    are breasts, others that they are bulls' testes which were sacrificed
    to her. Which is the true interpretation remains uncertain, but each
    represent fertility.

    There were festivals in honor of Artemis, such as the Brauronia, which
    was held in Brauron; and the festival of Artemis Orthia, held at
    Sparta, when young Spartan boys would try to steal cheeses from the
    altar. As they tried they would be whipped, the meaning of Orthia and
    the nature of the ritual whipping has been lost and there is no
    logical explanation or translation. Among the epithets given to
    Artemis are: Potnia Theron (mistress of wild animals) this title was
    mentioned by the great poet Homer; Kourotrophos (nurse of youths);
    Locheia (helper in childbirth); Agrotera (huntress); and Cynthia
    (taken from her birthplace on Mount Cynthus on Delos). When young
    girls reached puberty they were initiated into her cult, but when they
    decided to marry, which Artemis was not against, they were asked to
    lay in front of the altar all the paraphernalia of their virginity,
    toys, dolls and locks of their hair, they then left the domain of the
    virgin goddess.

    A thought from Plutarch:

    "But most kings and rulers are so foolish as to act like unskilful sculptors, who think their colossal figures look large and imposing if they are modelled with their feet far apart, their muscles tense, and their mouths wide open. For these rulers seem by heaviness of voice, harshness of expression, truculence of manner, and unsociability in their way of living to be imitating the dignity and majesty of the princely station, although in fact they are not at all different from colossal statues which have a heroic and godlike form on the outside, but inside are full of clay, stone, and lead, � except that in the case of the statues the weight of those substances keeps them permanently upright without leaning, whereas uneducated generals and rulers are often rocked and capsized by the ignorance within them; for since the foundation upon which they have built up their lofty power is not laid straight, they lean with it and lose their balance ... For one who is falling cannot hold others up, nor can one who is ignorant teach, nor the uncultivated impart culture, nor the disorderly make order, nor can he rule who is under no rule. But most people foolishly believe that the first advantage of ruling is freedom from being ruled." - Plutarch, Moralia, "To An Uneducated Ruler" 2


    Valete bene!

    Cato
    Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71218 From: David Kling Date: 2009-10-21
    Subject: Re: Ancient Roman Shade
    Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus A. Sempronio Regulo salutem dicit

    Good to see you back.

    Vale;

    Modianus

    On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 10:15 PM, A. Sempronius Regulus <asempronius.regulus@...> wrote:
     

    Salvete omnes,
    I am back from some family business in Iowa. We have a beef farm up there and it is an old German (Swabian) settlement. We have a north, south, east, and west farmstead. The latter is rented out to Amish in exchange for labor and oversight around the larger farm. The north farmstead has a ghost. When it appears, it descends stairs to occupy a spot in front of the fireplace in the ground-floor formal living room/reception room (the family room being a separate room). When the ghost occupies the spot, it is stone freezing cold. It is cold with a roaring fire in the fireplace three feet away. It is cold with a space heater put into the middle of the spot. The family did have a geologist and others come study if it was a seasonal and/or natural phenomenon. The results could not explain it. Humans and animals feel the cold but mechanical and chemical means do not detect it. Dogs and cats detect something but instruments do not.
     
    Valete,
    A. Sempronius Regulus



    Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71219 From: Cn. Cornelius Lentulus Date: 2009-10-21
    Subject: Latin Films
    Cn. Lentulus magister Sodalitatis Latinitatis omnibus sal.


    These are very useful films for those who want to learn (or simply to see and hear):


    https://www. ucl.ac.uk/ language- centre/Self- Access-Centre/ latin/Films- Streamed. php


    The Latin language is alive!

    Vivat lingua Latina!

    Vivat Nova Roma!



    Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71220 From: Lucius Iulius Regulus Date: 2009-10-21
    Subject: Athenaeum, Ancient Roman Auditorium Unveiled
    Interesting article, thought it might be of interest to some.

    __________________________________________________
    Do You Yahoo!?
    Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
    http://mail.yahoo.com
    Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71221 From: T. Annaeus Regulus Date: 2009-10-21
    Subject: Re: Sigh -- Smile And Economics of late paganism/Xtianism
    Salve,
     
    Interesting hypothesis, I will look forward to reading the results of your more in-depth research question. If I may suggest another possible contributing factor, the Christian Church was far more centralized than pagan groups. Would the fact that there were only a handful of Patriarchs to deal with as versus a myriad of individual pagan temples have made the administration easier for a centralized government. Essentially putting the onus for maintaining communication with the smaller groups on the Patriarchs, allowing the administration to focus on other things? The early Church was known for its superb organization.
     
    It certainly allows the central government unprecedented influence on the actions of the general population via a small group of Patriarchs that were under the thumb of the emperor. In an era when Rome is suffering from hyperinflation, barbarian raids, increased income gaps, plagues, and a host of other ills, it is certainly worth money to keep the people focused on their imminent salvation, meekness and Paradise instead of their current situation. Hard to measure certainly, but potentially a contributing factor. The savings could have been significant.
     
    Food for thought.
     
    Vale,
    T. Annaeus Regulus

    Sent: Wednesday, October 21, 2009 12:26 AM
    Subject: [Nova-Roma] Sigh -- Smile And Economics of late paganism/Xtianism

     

    Salvete omnes,
    Coming back, I found a flood of emails to the main list that suggested Nova Roma had heavy rains that flooded the sewers and catacombs which brought the rats and other refuse out. So I sort of felt - sigh.
     
    Then I saw, after years in intelligence one knows how to be legally an unsubscribed party to lists and private email circulations, that the BA gang is just uselessly pumping themselves up -- run Maximus for whatever, Tribune? (too bad about Graecus), that there is really no threat from them. They couldn't plan a mutual grope on a beach in broad daylight.
     
    Steve Moore resignation: well, a loss to the extent he was pagan, a gain to the extent he was part of the Cato-Sulla camp.
     
    I had a chance to visit some old friends and colleagues out in San Francisco at SFSU. I know this will make Graecus uncomfortable since he hates what he calls "European Anti-Americanism" (especially, the French criticizing the US) as well as the former citizen Poplicola who is apparently struggling along in classics at SFSU, because some of those classics professors are Marxists. I will be posting a research question, a Marxist or shall we say economic question about the rise of Christianity and the demise of paganism in a couple of days that my friends out their raised. Well, here is the gist now: hypothesis - the empire had sagging income, high unpaid taxes, and very expensive public pagan rites at state expense; pagan temples filled with treasure; a Christian church with organization and money; killing state support for paganism, robbing the pagan temples of treasure, and supporting a rich church for income was the economic motive of the empire to suppress paganism. Question: if true, is there a means to calculate the estimated wealth of pagan temples, the costs of public rituals, and wealth of the Christian church? If so, is there a means to determine how much Christian basilicas cost and who paid for it? The surmise is the empire would not have paid for it if it was not a good investment.
     
    Valete,
    A. Sempronius Regulus

    ____________ _________ _________ _________ _________ __
    Do You Yahoo!?
    Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
    http://mail. yahoo.com

    Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71222 From: A. Sempronius Regulus Date: 2009-10-21
    Subject: Re: Ancient Roman Shade
    Salve,
    Thanks.
    I plan to add a section on ancient religions, including gnosticism, in the Wiki.
    Vale,
    ASR

    --- On Wed, 10/21/09, David Kling <tau.athanasios@...> wrote:

    From: David Kling <tau.athanasios@...>
    Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: Ancient Roman Shade
    To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
    Date: Wednesday, October 21, 2009, 9:31 AM

     
    Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus A. Sempronio Regulo salutem dicit

    Good to see you back.

    Vale;

    Modianus

    On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 10:15 PM, A. Sempronius Regulus <asempronius. regulus@yahoo. com> wrote:
     
    Salvete omnes,
    I am back from some family business in Iowa. We have a beef farm up there and it is an old German (Swabian) settlement. We have a north, south, east, and west farmstead. The latter is rented out to Amish in exchange for labor and oversight around the larger farm. The north farmstead has a ghost. When it appears, it descends stairs to occupy a spot in front of the fireplace in the ground-floor formal living room/reception room (the family room being a separate room). When the ghost occupies the spot, it is stone freezing cold. It is cold with a roaring fire in the fireplace three feet away. It is cold with a space heater put into the middle of the spot. The family did have a geologist and others come study if it was a seasonal and/or natural phenomenon. The results could not explain it. Humans and animals feel the cold but mechanical and chemical means do not detect it. Dogs and cats detect something but instruments do not.
     
    Valete,
    A. Sempronius Regulus



    Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71223 From: A. Sempronius Regulus Date: 2009-10-21
    Subject: Re: Sigh -- Smile And Economics of late paganism/Xtianism
    Salve,
    Yes, that is part of the equation but the public (polis) cults had a state stipend. Mystery religions were supported by their initiates -- who would mention the expense.
    But some cults were paid out of private funds and reimbursed. But, the temples had treasuries. All the votive gifts were the "divine's" property.
     
    Vale,
    ASR
    --- On Wed, 10/21/09, C.Maria Caeca <c.mariacaeca@...> wrote:

    From: C.Maria Caeca <c.mariacaeca@...>
    Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Sigh -- Smile And Economics of late paganism/Xtianism
    To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
    Date: Wednesday, October 21, 2009, 3:17 AM

     
    Caeca Regulo sal,
     
    I'm no expert, but somewhere I believe I read (no, can't reference it, sorry) that, at least in some cases, individuals or families sponsored (paid for) public ceremonies and major ...um ..events of a religious nature. I suspect this was more a feature of the Republic and early Imperial period, but I wonder how much of the costs involved in public ritual were born by private individuals or groups, and whether, as time passed, that practice abated to the point that it caused a financial problem for the State?
     
    I'm also hoping that I'm not seeing my messages to the list as a result of new address moderation, and not because of my technical ineptitude.  If whoever is monitoring the list from the Praetorian (sp?) cohors is in a good mood, could you let me know if you, at least, are receiving them?  Not fussing, just ...unsure of my technical prowess. (well, I *am*, but you really *don't* want me to expound on *those* abilities, LOL!
     
    C. Maria Caeca

    __________________________________________________
    Do You Yahoo!?
    Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
    http://mail.yahoo.com
    Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71224 From: Associazione Pomerium Date: 2009-10-21
    Subject: Notiziario POMERIVM #22, Ottobre 2009
    Attachments :
       

       


      salve ,
       


      ti informiamo che è on-line il nuovo numero di Pomerivm, il notiziario trimestrale dell'Associazione culturale Pomerium.

      Lo trovi all'indirizzo Internet http://www.pomerium.org/download.asp?file=POMERIVM_Ottobre2009.zip

       

      In questo numero:

       


      - Templum Veneris Genetricis
         Il tempio di Venere Genitrice, di Fabrizio Marocco


      - L'esercito romano dalle origini alla caduta dell'impero romano di Occidente

         di Marco Colombelli

       

      - Lucca, città medioevale... e romana

         di Massimiliano Ponti

       

      ... e ancora rubriche, calendario delle mostre, news, ecc.

       

      Buona lettura!

       

      Associazione Pomerium

       
       
      -- Per annullare la ricezione di questa email Ã¨ sufficiente inviare una mail all'indirizzo redazione@pomerium.org con oggetto "Revoca Abbonamento Pomerivm".
       
       

       Per informazioni:
      Associazione Pomerium - www.pomerium.org
      c/o Marocco F. - Viale Alessandrino 477 - 00172 Roma

      info@pomerium.org - amministrazione@pomerium.orgsegreteria@pomerium.org

       

      Vive ergo moribus praeteritis, loquere verbis praesentibus (Vivi perciò con la moralità degli antichi, ma usa le parole della modernità; A.Gellio - Notti Attiche)

      Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71225 From: rory12001 Date: 2009-10-21
      Subject: Re: Sigh -- Smile And Economics of late paganism/Xtianism
      Salve;
      thinking about it. It would seem money and power are the appeal in the Imperial choice. The state cultus deorum was decentralized, whereas I assume the Emperor controlled the christian cult, all the churches too so funds and power were centralized.
      vale
      Maior

      --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "A. Sempronius Regulus" <asempronius.regulus@...> wrote:
      >
      > Salve,
      > Yes, that is part of the equation but the public (polis) cults had a state stipend. Mystery religions were supported by their initiates -- who would mention the expense.
      >
      > But some cults were paid out of private funds and reimbursed. But, the temples had treasuries. All the votive gifts were the "divine's" property.
      >  
      > Vale,
      > ASR
      > --- On Wed, 10/21/09, C.Maria Caeca <c.mariacaeca@...> wrote:
      >
      >
      > From: C.Maria Caeca <c.mariacaeca@...>
      > Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Sigh -- Smile And Economics of late paganism/Xtianism
      > To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
      > Date: Wednesday, October 21, 2009, 3:17 AM
      >
      >
      >  
      >
      >
      >
      >
      > Caeca Regulo sal,
      >  
      > I'm no expert, but somewhere I believe I read (no, can't reference it, sorry) that, at least in some cases, individuals or families sponsored (paid for) public ceremonies and major ...um ..events of a religious nature. I suspect this was more a feature of the Republic and early Imperial period, but I wonder how much of the costs involved in public ritual were born by private individuals or groups, and whether, as time passed, that practice abated to the point that it caused a financial problem for the State?
      >  
      > I'm also hoping that I'm not seeing my messages to the list as a result of new address moderation, and not because of my technical ineptitude.  If whoever is monitoring the list from the Praetorian (sp?) cohors is in a good mood, could you let me know if you, at least, are receiving them?  Not fussing, just ...unsure of my technical prowess. (well, I *am*, but you really *don't* want me to expound on *those* abilities, LOL!
      >  
      > C. Maria Caeca
      >
      >
      >
      >
      >
      >
      >
      >
      >
      >
      >
      >
      >
      >
      > __________________________________________________
      > Do You Yahoo!?
      > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
      > http://mail.yahoo.com
      >
      Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71226 From: livia_plauta Date: 2009-10-21
      Subject: Re: Sigh -- Smile And Economics of late paganism/Xtianism
      Salve Semproni,

      when I went to school the marxist approach was all the rage in Italy. As a result I learned a lot of basic concepts and interdependencies that give me a very good ensemble view of historical periods, but never had to study any dates or names, etc. Those were part of the despicable "histoire evenementielle". The marxist approach tended to deny the importance of individual people in the developement of history, a very comforting concept (nobody is ever responsible for anything: events are caused by economic and social necessity and would play out the same way even if the people who in reality were the catalysts for them hadn't existed), but a big oversimplification.

      My students in Hungary seem to have studied "event history" only, and have no clue about social and economical structures.

      Well, as usual both sides of the coin seem equally necessary.

      This economic theory about the rise of Christianism seems quite convincing. I always thought it was rather due to decay of the centrally organized "welfare State", and its being supplanted by social services provided by the Church (a warning to all modern States who wish to privatize basic social services), but it seems probable that it was a concurrence of factors, and this economic one might just be one of the most important ones.

      My subconscious, however, like some sci-fi, seems to like "histoire evenementielle", because I keep dreaming of travelling back in time and preventing Constantine from winning, or just killing Saulus on the way of Damascus, and the like.

      Optime vale,
      Livia



      >
      > PS, don't let the mention of "Marxist" throw you as it already apparently has a couple (I still can't figure out the motivation of some in the BA to be willing to allow it to be caused in each other skid marks in their tighty whities), it is a mode of analysis -- basically, follow the money trail and who is getting cheated by whom.�There are just professors that still identify as such but that means they look at history in terms of economic motives. I am not proposing a revival of a regime like the USSR and Warsaw Pact that I spent a good many years fighting against. ASR��
      >
      > --- On Wed, 10/21/09, A. Sempronius Regulus <asempronius.regulus@...> wrote:
      >
      >
      > From: A. Sempronius Regulus <asempronius.regulus@...>
      > Subject: [Nova-Roma] Sigh -- Smile And Economics of late paganism/Xtianism
      > To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
      > Date: Wednesday, October 21, 2009, 2:56 AM
      >
      >
      > �
      >
      >
      >
      >
      >
      >
      >
      >
      > Salvete omnes,
      > Coming back, I found a flood of emails to the main list that suggested Nova Roma had heavy rains that flooded the sewers and catacombs which brought the rats and other refuse out. So I sort of felt - sigh.
      > �
      > Then I saw, after years in intelligence one knows how to be legally an unsubscribed party to lists and private email circulations, that the BA gang is just uselessly pumping themselves up -- run Maximus for whatever, Tribune? (too bad about Graecus), that there is really no threat from them. They couldn't plan a mutual grope on a beach in broad daylight.
      > �
      > Steve Moore resignation: well, a loss to the extent he was pagan, a gain to the extent he was part of the Cato-Sulla camp.
      > �
      > I had a chance to visit some old friends and colleagues out in San Francisco at SFSU. I know this will make Graecus uncomfortable since he hates what he calls "European Anti-Americanism" (especially, the French criticizing the US) as well as the former citizen Poplicola who is apparently struggling along in classics at SFSU, because some of those classics professors are Marxists. I will be posting a research question, a Marxist or shall we say economic question about the rise of Christianity and the demise of paganism in a couple of days that my friends out their raised. Well, here is the gist now: hypothesis - the empire had sagging income, high unpaid taxes, and very expensive public pagan rites at state expense; pagan temples filled with treasure; a Christian church with organization and money; killing state support for paganism, robbing the pagan temples of treasure, and supporting a rich church for income was the economic motive of the empire to
      > suppress paganism. Question: if true, is there a means to calculate the estimated wealth of pagan temples, the costs of public rituals, and wealth of the Christian church? If so, is there a means to determine how much�Christian basilicas cost and who paid for it? The surmise is the empire would not have paid for it if it was not a good investment.
      > �
      > Valete,
      > A. Sempronius Regulus
      > ____________ _________ _________ _________ _________ __
      > Do You Yahoo!?
      > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
      > http://mail. yahoo.com
      >
      Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71227 From: A. Sempronius Regulus Date: 2009-10-21
      Subject: Poplicola
      Salvete omnes,
       
      A slight correction: he seems to be doing well academically but is struggling money-wise.
      Before I knew about his bad choice of "friends", I offered the use of our condo in SF.
       
      Anyway, for affordable rents in San Francisco, there is a renter's COOP in the Castro District with all sorts of listings the realty people don't want to handle because they make no cut - they want upscale. These listings are not roach-infested rat traps. They are listings in nice Edwardians, Victorians, or older turn of the century apartment buildings that can't afford to list with the up-front realty people. Worse case scenario, one is sharing a Victorian flat with room-mates. Or, one might have a studio apartment shared in a house with a family. Travel expenses to and from the city or even inside -- there is a monthly mass transit pass that literally saves $100s per month.
       
      Anyone is welcome to pass that along to him. Maybe he will learn the error of his ways.
      I offered this advice before also but he was in a huff and told me he deleted it.
       
      ASR

      Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71228 From: A. Sempronius Regulus Date: 2009-10-21
      Subject: Re: Sigh -- Smile And Economics of late paganism/Xtianism
      Salve,
      The Church's organization alone would not have served the imperial purpose without wealth. There were other well-organized mysteries, but they were part of an economic fabric that the state was massively in debt sustaining. In the past, well-organized was a threat; Pythagoreans, Dionysians, Isis and Serapians. By the time of Christianity, well-organized alone would not cut it -- there had to be wealth.
      Bis spater,
      Vale,
      A. Sempronius Regulus

      --- On Wed, 10/21/09, T. Annaeus Regulus <t.annaevsregvlvs@...> wrote:

      From: T. Annaeus Regulus <t.annaevsregvlvs@...>
      Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Sigh -- Smile And Economics of late paganism/Xtianism
      To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
      Date: Wednesday, October 21, 2009, 8:18 PM

       
      Salve,
       
      Interesting hypothesis, I will look forward to reading the results of your more in-depth research question. If I may suggest another possible contributing factor, the Christian Church was far more centralized than pagan groups. Would the fact that there were only a handful of Patriarchs to deal with as versus a myriad of individual pagan temples have made the administration easier for a centralized government. Essentially putting the onus for maintaining communication with the smaller groups on the Patriarchs, allowing the administration to focus on other things? The early Church was known for its superb organization.
       
      It certainly allows the central government unprecedented influence on the actions of the general population via a small group of Patriarchs that were under the thumb of the emperor. In an era when Rome is suffering from hyperinflation, barbarian raids, increased income gaps, plagues, and a host of other ills, it is certainly worth money to keep the people focused on their imminent salvation, meekness and Paradise instead of their current situation. Hard to measure certainly, but potentially a contributing factor. The savings could have been significant.
       
      Food for thought.
       
      Vale,
      T. Annaeus Regulus

      Sent: Wednesday, October 21, 2009 12:26 AM
      Subject: [Nova-Roma] Sigh -- Smile And Economics of late paganism/Xtianism

       
      Salvete omnes,
      Coming back, I found a flood of emails to the main list that suggested Nova Roma had heavy rains that flooded the sewers and catacombs which brought the rats and other refuse out. So I sort of felt - sigh.
       
      Then I saw, after years in intelligence one knows how to be legally an unsubscribed party to lists and private email circulations, that the BA gang is just uselessly pumping themselves up -- run Maximus for whatever, Tribune? (too bad about Graecus), that there is really no threat from them. They couldn't plan a mutual grope on a beach in broad daylight.
       
      Steve Moore resignation: well, a loss to the extent he was pagan, a gain to the extent he was part of the Cato-Sulla camp.
       
      I had a chance to visit some old friends and colleagues out in San Francisco at SFSU. I know this will make Graecus uncomfortable since he hates what he calls "European Anti-Americanism" (especially, the French criticizing the US) as well as the former citizen Poplicola who is apparently struggling along in classics at SFSU, because some of those classics professors are Marxists. I will be posting a research question, a Marxist or shall we say economic question about the rise of Christianity and the demise of paganism in a couple of days that my friends out their raised. Well, here is the gist now: hypothesis - the empire had sagging income, high unpaid taxes, and very expensive public pagan rites at state expense; pagan temples filled with treasure; a Christian church with organization and money; killing state support for paganism, robbing the pagan temples of treasure, and supporting a rich church for income was the economic motive of the empire to suppress paganism. Question: if true, is there a means to calculate the estimated wealth of pagan temples, the costs of public rituals, and wealth of the Christian church? If so, is there a means to determine how much Christian basilicas cost and who paid for it? The surmise is the empire would not have paid for it if it was not a good investment.
       
      Valete,
      A. Sempronius Regulus

      ____________ _________ _________ _________ _________ __
      Do You Yahoo!?
      Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
      http://mail. yahoo.com

      __________________________________________________
      Do You Yahoo!?
      Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
      http://mail.yahoo.com
      Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71229 From: David Kling Date: 2009-10-21
      Subject: Re: Ancient Roman Shade
      Salve:

      Nice.  I look forward to seeing it.  I'm presenting at a local UU church on Gnosticism towards the end of November.

      Vale;

      Modianus

      On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 5:48 PM, A. Sempronius Regulus <asempronius.regulus@...> wrote:
       

      Salve,
      Thanks.
      I plan to add a section on ancient religions, including gnosticism, in the Wiki.
      Vale,
      ASR

      Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71230 From: A. Sempronius Regulus Date: 2009-10-21
      Subject: Re: Ancient Roman Shade
      I'm presenting something similar. I'm arguing, ex hypothesi and devil's advocate, the merits of the post-Burton Mack view that the historical Jesus started out as a gnostic saviour figure and Mark created a "historical Jesus". It is basically a presentation of the latest German and French New Testament scholarship. I think G. Ludemann (formerly of Gottingen and now of Vanderbilt) is supposed to also appear.
      I don't know how people learn of these theories or who locally can speak about them. Could it be there is a spirit moving in the times?
      Do we live in a renewed Hellenistic Age, of sorts?
      Best,
      Vale,
      ASR
      --- On Wed, 10/21/09, David Kling <tau.athanasios@...> wrote:

      From: David Kling <tau.athanasios@...>
      Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: Ancient Roman Shade
      To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
      Date: Wednesday, October 21, 2009, 11:19 PM

       
      Salve:

      Nice.  I look forward to seeing it.  I'm presenting at a local UU church on Gnosticism towards the end of November.

      Vale;

      Modianus

      On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 5:48 PM, A. Sempronius Regulus <asempronius. regulus@yahoo. com> wrote:
       
      Salve,
      Thanks.
      I plan to add a section on ancient religions, including gnosticism, in the Wiki.
      Vale,
      ASR

      __________________________________________________
      Do You Yahoo!?
      Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
      http://mail.yahoo.com
      Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71231 From: A. Sempronius Regulus Date: 2009-10-21
      Subject: Re: Sigh -- Smile And Economics of late paganism/Xtianism
      Salve,
      Please refer back in the archives on Roman law: the public cults were only the traditional Roman cults on the Capitoline and Aventine mounts plus a few scattered around the city because the whole city was an altar.
       
      All other cults were private (all Roman civil law that included religions was private law) even if an emperor endorsed it and used state funds to build a temple and coinage. The empire was legally a private and civil venture. There were two state banks: the Public, and the Imperial (which was the personal property of the emperors -- since Imperial Russia followed this legal tradition, the Russian bank was always public but the Russian Empire's bank was private property of the Czars -- which is why the newly found Soviet Union found itself bankrupt and why Marie Romanov returned to Russia under Yeltsin and Putin with a deal).
       
      Vale,
      ASR

      --- On Wed, 10/21/09, rory12001 <rory12001@...> wrote:

      From: rory12001 <rory12001@...>
      Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Sigh -- Smile And Economics of late paganism/Xtianism
      To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
      Date: Wednesday, October 21, 2009, 10:14 PM

       
      Salve;
      thinking about it. It would seem money and power are the appeal in the Imperial choice. The state cultus deorum was decentralized, whereas I assume the Emperor controlled the christian cult, all the churches too so funds and power were centralized.
      vale
      Maior

      --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com, "A. Sempronius Regulus" <asempronius. regulus@. ..> wrote:
      >
      > Salve,
      > Yes, that is part of the equation but the public (polis) cults had a state stipend. Mystery religions were supported by their initiates -- who would mention the expense.
      >
      > But some cults were paid out of private funds and reimbursed. But, the temples had treasuries. All the votive gifts were the "divine's" property.
      >  
      > Vale,
      > ASR
      > --- On Wed, 10/21/09, C.Maria Caeca <c.mariacaeca@ ...> wrote:
      >
      >
      > From: C.Maria Caeca <c.mariacaeca@ ...>
      > Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Sigh -- Smile And Economics of late paganism/Xtianism
      > To: Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com
      > Date: Wednesday, October 21, 2009, 3:17 AM
      >
      >
      >  
      >
      >
      >
      >
      > Caeca Regulo sal,
      >  
      > I'm no expert, but somewhere I believe I read (no, can't reference it, sorry) that, at least in some cases, individuals or families sponsored (paid for) public ceremonies and major ...um ..events of a religious nature. I suspect this was more a feature of the Republic and early Imperial period, but I wonder how much of the costs involved in public ritual were born by private individuals or groups, and whether, as time passed, that practice abated to the point that it caused a financial problem for the State?
      >  
      > I'm also hoping that I'm not seeing my messages to the list as a result of new address moderation, and not because of my technical ineptitude.  If whoever is monitoring the list from the Praetorian (sp?) cohors is in a good mood, could you let me know if you, at least, are receiving them?  Not fussing, just ...unsure of my technical prowess. (well, I *am*, but you really *don't* want me to expound on *those* abilities, LOL!
      >  
      > C. Maria Caeca
      >
      >
      >
      >
      >
      >
      >
      >
      >
      >
      >
      >
      >
      >
      > ____________ _________ _________ _________ _________ __
      > Do You Yahoo!?
      > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
      > http://mail. yahoo.com
      >


      Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71232 From: David Kling Date: 2009-10-21
      Subject: Re: Ancient Roman Shade
      Very interesting stuff.  I'll have to raid our library to get more info on the two scholars you mentioned.  

      Valete;

      Modianus

      On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 7:27 PM, A. Sempronius Regulus <asempronius.regulus@...> wrote:
       

      I'm presenting something similar. I'm arguing, ex hypothesi and devil's advocate, the merits of the post-Burton Mack view that the historical Jesus started out as a gnostic saviour figure and Mark created a "historical Jesus". It is basically a presentation of the latest German and French New Testament scholarship. I think G. Ludemann (formerly of Gottingen and now of Vanderbilt) is supposed to also appear.
      I don't know how people learn of these theories or who locally can speak about them. Could it be there is a spirit moving in the times?
      Do we live in a renewed Hellenistic Age, of sorts?
      Best,
      Vale,
      ASR



      Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71233 From: T. Annaeus Regulus Date: 2009-10-21
      Subject: Re: Sigh -- Smile And Economics of late paganism/Xtianism
      Salve,
       
      But those wouldn't give the same level of control. Being a Pythagorean didn't mean you didn't accept the other cults, quite the opposite. A belief in the entire pantheon was the norm I believe. If the cult started making unacceptable demands of you, you could leave the cult without any drastic consequences and join a separate cult. If you were a Christian on the other hand, you automatically aren't involved with other cults, and to give up Christianity would be to give up your perceived chance of salvation and all your Christian friends and family in many cases.
       
      Christianity, I think, was ahead of the game in convincing people they needed it exclusively and specifically. Not only that, but being so new, it was very flexible to adding new traditions and tenants, which is very useful to the despot. Other Eastern Mystery cults like Mithraism were similar, but I think Christianity's stress on the irreplaceable nature of the Church as the only path to the promised Paradise made it a much better tool to influence the population. Perhaps there was no advantage, just syncretism to create a homogenously acceptable belief system. I have read of Hadrian commenting on the confusion between Jesus and Serapis in Egypt, perhaps it was similar everywhere.
       
      I'm not proposing this as an alternative to your theory, merely an extension.
       
      Anyways, I am off to bed. Interesting topic, I hope to read more when you post in full.
       
      Vale,
      T. Annaeus Regulus

      Sent: Wednesday, October 21, 2009 8:44 PM
      Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Sigh -- Smile And Economics of late paganism/Xtianism

       

      Salve,
      The Church's organization alone would not have served the imperial purpose without wealth. There were other well-organized mysteries, but they were part of an economic fabric that the state was massively in debt sustaining. In the past, well-organized was a threat; Pythagoreans, Dionysians, Isis and Serapians. By the time of Christianity, well-organized alone would not cut it -- there had to be wealth.
      Bis spater,
      Vale,
      A. Sempronius Regulus

      --- On Wed, 10/21/09, T. Annaeus Regulus <t.annaevsregvlvs@ ymail.com> wrote:

      From: T. Annaeus Regulus <t.annaevsregvlvs@ ymail.com>
      Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Sigh -- Smile And Economics of late paganism/Xtianism
      To: Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com
      Date: Wednesday, October 21, 2009, 8:18 PM

       
      Salve,
       
      Interesting hypothesis, I will look forward to reading the results of your more in-depth research question. If I may suggest another possible contributing factor, the Christian Church was far more centralized than pagan groups. Would the fact that there were only a handful of Patriarchs to deal with as versus a myriad of individual pagan temples have made the administration easier for a centralized government. Essentially putting the onus for maintaining communication with the smaller groups on the Patriarchs, allowing the administration to focus on other things? The early Church was known for its superb organization.
       
      It certainly allows the central government unprecedented influence on the actions of the general population via a small group of Patriarchs that were under the thumb of the emperor. In an era when Rome is suffering from hyperinflation, barbarian raids, increased income gaps, plagues, and a host of other ills, it is certainly worth money to keep the people focused on their imminent salvation, meekness and Paradise instead of their current situation. Hard to measure certainly, but potentially a contributing factor. The savings could have been significant.
       
      Food for thought.
       
      Vale,
      T. Annaeus Regulus

      Sent: Wednesday, October 21, 2009 12:26 AM
      Subject: [Nova-Roma] Sigh -- Smile And Economics of late paganism/Xtianism

       
      Salvete omnes,
      Coming back, I found a flood of emails to the main list that suggested Nova Roma had heavy rains that flooded the sewers and catacombs which brought the rats and other refuse out. So I sort of felt - sigh.
       
      Then I saw, after years in intelligence one knows how to be legally an unsubscribed party to lists and private email circulations, that the BA gang is just uselessly pumping themselves up -- run Maximus for whatever, Tribune? (too bad about Graecus), that there is really no threat from them. They couldn't plan a mutual grope on a beach in broad daylight.
       
      Steve Moore resignation: well, a loss to the extent he was pagan, a gain to the extent he was part of the Cato-Sulla camp.
       
      I had a chance to visit some old friends and colleagues out in San Francisco at SFSU. I know this will make Graecus uncomfortable since he hates what he calls "European Anti-Americanism" (especially, the French criticizing the US) as well as the former citizen Poplicola who is apparently struggling along in classics at SFSU, because some of those classics professors are Marxists. I will be posting a research question, a Marxist or shall we say economic question about the rise of Christianity and the demise of paganism in a couple of days that my friends out their raised. Well, here is the gist now: hypothesis - the empire had sagging income, high unpaid taxes, and very expensive public pagan rites at state expense; pagan temples filled with treasure; a Christian church with organization and money; killing state support for paganism, robbing the pagan temples of treasure, and supporting a rich church for income was the economic motive of the empire to suppress paganism. Question: if true, is there a means to calculate the estimated wealth of pagan temples, the costs of public rituals, and wealth of the Christian church? If so, is there a means to determine how much Christian basilicas cost and who paid for it? The surmise is the empire would not have paid for it if it was not a good investment.
       
      Valete,
      A. Sempronius Regulus

      ____________ _________ _________ _________ _________ __
      Do You Yahoo!?
      Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
      http://mail. yahoo.com

      ____________ _________ _________ _________ _________ __
      Do You Yahoo!?
      Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
      http://mail. yahoo.com

      Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71234 From: rory12001 Date: 2009-10-21
      Subject: Re: Sigh -- Smile And Economics of late paganism/Xtianism
      Salve Regule;
      Optime, this was the discussion you and Cordus had about law, I needed to look at;I'll go dig for it.
      vale
      Maior


      --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "A. Sempronius Regulus" <asempronius.regulus@...> wrote:
      >
      > Salve,
      > Please refer back in the archives on Roman law: the public cults were only the traditional Roman cults on the Capitoline and Aventine mounts plus a few scattered around the city because the whole city was an altar.
      >  
      > All other cults were private (all Roman civil law that included religions was private law) even if an emperor endorsed it and used state funds to build a temple and coinage. The empire was legally a private and civil venture. There were two state banks: the Public, and the Imperial (which was the personal property of the emperors -- since Imperial Russia followed this legal tradition, the Russian bank was always public but the Russian Empire's bank was private property of the Czars -- which is why the newly found Soviet Union found itself bankrupt and why Marie Romanov returned to Russia under Yeltsin and Putin with a deal).
      >  
      > Vale,
      > ASR
      >
      > --- On Wed, 10/21/09, rory12001 <rory12001@...> wrote:
      >
      >
      > From: rory12001 <rory12001@...>
      > Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Sigh -- Smile And Economics of late paganism/Xtianism
      > To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
      > Date: Wednesday, October 21, 2009, 10:14 PM
      >
      >
      >  
      >
      >
      >
      > Salve;
      > thinking about it. It would seem money and power are the appeal in the Imperial choice. The state cultus deorum was decentralized, whereas I assume the Emperor controlled the christian cult, all the churches too so funds and power were centralized.
      > vale
      > Maior
      >
      > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com, "A. Sempronius Regulus" <asempronius. regulus@ ..> wrote:
      > >
      > > Salve,
      > > Yes, that is part of the equation but the public (polis) cults had a state stipend. Mystery religions were supported by their initiates -- who would mention the expense.
      > >
      > > But some cults were paid out of private funds and reimbursed. But, the temples had treasuries. All the votive gifts were the "divine's" property.
      > >  
      > > Vale,
      > > ASR
      > > --- On Wed, 10/21/09, C.Maria Caeca <c.mariacaeca@ ...> wrote:
      > >
      > >
      > > From: C.Maria Caeca <c.mariacaeca@ ...>
      > > Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Sigh -- Smile And Economics of late paganism/Xtianism
      > > To: Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com
      > > Date: Wednesday, October 21, 2009, 3:17 AM
      > >
      > >
      > >  
      > >
      > >
      > >
      > >
      > > Caeca Regulo sal,
      > >  
      > > I'm no expert, but somewhere I believe I read (no, can't reference it, sorry) that, at least in some cases, individuals or families sponsored (paid for) public ceremonies and major ...um ..events of a religious nature. I suspect this was more a feature of the Republic and early Imperial period, but I wonder how much of the costs involved in public ritual were born by private individuals or groups, and whether, as time passed, that practice abated to the point that it caused a financial problem for the State?
      > >  
      > > I'm also hoping that I'm not seeing my messages to the list as a result of new address moderation, and not because of my technical ineptitude.  If whoever is monitoring the list from the Praetorian (sp?) cohors is in a good mood, could you let me know if you, at least, are receiving them?  Not fussing, just ...unsure of my technical prowess. (well, I *am*, but you really *don't* want me to expound on *those* abilities, LOL!
      > >  
      > > C. Maria Caeca
      > >
      > >
      > >
      > >
      > >
      > >
      > >
      > >
      > >
      > >
      > >
      > >
      > >
      > >
      > > ____________ _________ _________ _________ _________ __
      > > Do You Yahoo!?
      > > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
      > > http://mail. yahoo.com
      > >
      >
      Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71235 From: A. Sempronius Regulus Date: 2009-10-21
      Subject: Re: Ancient Roman Shade
      I could teach within Nova Roma an early Christian
      Textual Criticism course.
       
      We would start out on three venues: (1) epistle criticism, (2) gospel criticism, (3) quest for the historical Jesus.
       
      The follow up would be on the consequences of the Nag Hammadi finds, critical textual analysis, and the resulting conclusions.
       
      We could start off very basic -- there are approx. 5446 greek NT manuscripts. They don't agree. We have several versions, for example, of the gospel of Mark. The oldest fragment dates from a 180 years after the events it is supposedly an "eye-witness" account of -- it is a credit card sized fragment from the 18th chapter of the gospel of John.
       
      We could start off very basic -- the actual dates of the actual physical texts, fragments, and etc., we have.
       
      Best, ASR
       
       
      --- On Thu, 10/22/09, David Kling <tau.athanasios@...> wrote:

      From: David Kling <tau.athanasios@...>
      Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: Ancient Roman Shade
      To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
      Date: Thursday, October 22, 2009, 12:25 AM

       
      Very interesting stuff.  I'll have to raid our library to get more info on the two scholars you mentioned.  

      Valete;

      Modianus

      On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 7:27 PM, A. Sempronius Regulus <asempronius. regulus@yahoo. com> wrote:
       
      I'm presenting something similar. I'm arguing, ex hypothesi and devil's advocate, the merits of the post-Burton Mack view that the historical Jesus started out as a gnostic saviour figure and Mark created a "historical Jesus". It is basically a presentation of the latest German and French New Testament scholarship. I think G. Ludemann (formerly of Gottingen and now of Vanderbilt) is supposed to also appear.
      I don't know how people learn of these theories or who locally can speak about them. Could it be there is a spirit moving in the times?
      Do we live in a renewed Hellenistic Age, of sorts?
      Best,
      Vale,
      ASR



      Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71236 From: gualterus_graecus Date: 2009-10-21
      Subject: Re: Ancient Roman Shade
      P52 is usually dated to circa 125 CE, so about 100 years after the supposed events, not 180.

      -Gualterus

      --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "A. Sempronius Regulus" <asempronius.regulus@...> wrote:
      >
      > I could teach within Nova Roma an early Christian
      > Textual Criticism course.
      >  
      > We would start out on three venues: (1) epistle criticism, (2) gospel criticism, (3) quest for the historical Jesus.
      >  
      > The follow up would be on the consequences of the Nag Hammadi finds, critical textual analysis, and the resulting conclusions.
      >  
      > We could start off very basic -- there are approx. 5446 greek NT manuscripts. They don't agree. We have several versions, for example, of the gospel of Mark. The oldest fragment dates from a 180 years after the events it is supposedly an "eye-witness" account of -- it is a credit card sized fragment from the 18th chapter of the gospel of John.
      >  
      > We could start off very basic -- the actual dates of the actual physical texts, fragments, and etc., we have.
      >  
      > Best, ASR
      >  
      >  
      > --- On Thu, 10/22/09, David Kling <tau.athanasios@...> wrote:
      >
      >
      > From: David Kling <tau.athanasios@...>
      > Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: Ancient Roman Shade
      > To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
      > Date: Thursday, October 22, 2009, 12:25 AM
      >
      >
      >  
      >
      >
      >
      > Very interesting stuff.  I'll have to raid our library to get more info on the two scholars you mentioned.  
      >
      >
      > Valete;
      >
      >
      > Modianus
      >
      >
      > On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 7:27 PM, A. Sempronius Regulus <asempronius. regulus@yahoo. com> wrote:
      >
      >
      >  
      >
      >
      >
      >
      >
      >
      >
      >
      > I'm presenting something similar. I'm arguing, ex hypothesi and devil's advocate, the merits of the post-Burton Mack view that the historical Jesus started out as a gnostic saviour figure and Mark created a "historical Jesus". It is basically a presentation of the latest German and French New Testament scholarship. I think G. Ludemann (formerly of Gottingen and now of Vanderbilt) is supposed to also appear.
      > I don't know how people learn of these theories or who locally can speak about them. Could it be there is a spirit moving in the times?
      > Do we live in a renewed Hellenistic Age, of sorts?
      > Best,
      >
      > Vale,
      > ASR
      >
      Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71237 From: louisgates2001 Date: 2009-10-21
      Subject: Selling 2 suits of Roman SCA armor
      [Moderator's note: This is being given a one time approval. If anyone is interested in doing business with this gentleman, please do so off list.]

      Hi Guys, Between my hip replacement and my bad knees I've come to the sad conclusion that I really shouldnt fight anymore.

      I have 2 suits of armor, never really used, a good starter helmet with coiffe 3 shields, sword, mace and some rattan.

      Suit 1:Brown Leather. Roman, chest lorica, neck, full arms and legs, skirt, roman shield with boss and assorted extras.

      Suit 2: Black Barrel and mild steel, also roman style but can adjust to fit most time periods. Suit is in goalie bag(very high quality)
      Comes with black aluminum kite and round shield.

      I am 5'8'' was about 54 inch chest so you can def make the suits smaller if neccesary.

      I forget the names of the guys that made them but the stuff is pretty darn nice. I payed a good buck for the stuff and would like to find a good home for it so please make me an offer.

      Respectfully, Jason 516-528-6253
      Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71238 From: Patrick O Date: 2009-10-22
      Subject: Report of the Senate - Fl. Galerius Aurelianus Tribunus Plebis
      REPORT OF THE SENATE (second draft) Fl. Galerius Aurelianus Tribunus Plebis

      The Senate was called into session at 11.00 hour (CET) on 9 Oct. 2762, with discussions continuing until approximately sunset in Rome (17.00 hrs CET) on 13 Oct. 2762.

      Voting on the Agenda began in the second hour at 06.45 hrs CET on 14 Oct. 2762 and concluded at 17.00 hrs CET on 18 Oct. 2762.

      "VTI ROGAS" indicates a vote in favor of an item,
      "ANTIQVO" is a vote against,
      "ABSTINEO" is an open abstention

      RELATIO

      Quod bonum felixque sit populo Romano Quiritium, referimus ad vos, Patres et Matres conscripti:

      Item I.
      M. MINUCIUS AUDENS
      M. Minucius Audens resigned his citizenship and all his offices including his seat in the Nova Roman Senate. Under the terms of the Lex Minucia Moravia de civitate eiuranda former citizens must wait ninety days before they can be reinstated, unless the Senate waives the return period.

      Following a request from Censor Ti. Galerius Paulinus, the Consuls request the Senate of Nova Roma to waive the ninety day waiting period and to return M. Minucius Audens to Nova Roman citizenship.

      Quid de ea re fieri placet? Item I Passes: 23 Vti Rogas; 4 Antiqvo.

      ----------------------------
      Quod bonum felixque sit populo Romano Quiritium, referimus ad vos, Patres et Matres conscripti:
      Item II.
      SENATE RULES
      In recent times the Senate list has been becoming a tacky place for
      discussion, where everybody seems to feel authorized to attack and insult everybody.

      To avoid this situation, the Consuls propose the establishment of some minimum standards.
      - The Senate list must be under the moderation control of the Consuls.
      - The Contio will be moderated. Each Senator shall have her or his respective turns for speech and replies according to the traditions followed in ancient Rome. So nobody can monopolize the Senate rostrum and become the center of all debates.
      - The Senate list will be closed between sessions. If the Senatores would like to discuss Nova Roma matters, they can do this in private or in other forums.
      - Discussions will be not allowed during the voting time.
      - Off topic messages during contio or voting time will be rejected.

      Quid de ea re fieri placet? Item II Fails: 13 Vti Rogas, 13 Antiqvo, 1
      Abstineo

      The following 27 Senatores voted in the current session:

      MCC Marcus Curiatius Complutensis
      LCSF Lucius Cornelius Sulla Felix
      CCS C. Curius Saturninus
      TGP Tiberius Galerius Paulinus
      MIP M. Iulius Perusianus
      GEC Gaius Equitius Cato
      PMA Publius Memmius Albucius
      MAM Marcus Arminius Maior
      MHM Marca Hortensia Maior
      GIC Gnaeus Iulius Caesar
      MIS M. Iulius Severus
      QSP Quintus Suetonius Paulinus
      CFBQ Caeso Fabius Buteo Quintilianus
      GEM Gnaeus Equitius Marinus
      ATS A. Tullia Scholastica
      GVA Gaius Vipsanius Agrippa
      PUSV Publius Ullerus Stephanus Venator
      TIS T. Iulius Sabinus
      CFBM Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus
      EIL Equestria Iunia Laeca
      MMPH M. Moravius Piscinus Horatianus
      QFM Quintus Fabius Maximus
      FGA Flavius Galerius Aurelianus
      CFD Caius Flavius Diocletianus
      DIPI Decius Iunius Palladius Invictus
      MLA Marcus Lucretius Agricola
      ECF Emilia Curia Finnica

      The following 3 Senators did not cast a vote, and their absence was not announced or justified in line with the Senatus Consultum defining a quorum and the LEX OCTAVIA DE SENATORIBUS:

      CMM C. Marius Merullus
      FCA Fr. Apulius Caesar
      AMA Arn. Moravia Aurelia

      MCC
      Item I: Antiqvo. I am against the exception to the general rule.

      Item II: Vti Rogas. We need order in our Senate meetings.

      LCSF
      Item I: Vti Rogas. This is probably the best item these consuls have
      presented to the Senate.

      Item II: Antiqvo. And this is probably the worst item presented by the
      consuls. The same consul who has utterly diminished the office of the consulship no less. Given the sockpuppet issue. Yeah, lets give the consuls more authority. Let them determine free speech for them, but not for anyone else who disagrees with them. So, dictatorial. If this item passes, I will look forward to the law of unintended consequences.

      CCS
      Item I: Antiqvo. I have always been for mercy and against unnecessary rules, but I have now realized that I have been too liberal in this. Allowing Cato to return was a huge mistake. Perhaps if he would have had to wait the normal period he would have acted differently. I don't want to see same again. Let Audens wait the time he should and calm down.

      Item II: Vti Rogas. Much need change. Senate session list is not a chatroom.

      TGP
      Item I: Vti Rogas. Senator Audens is the type of person who the exception rule was written for. I respectfully request that all Senators to vote to restore Senator Audens to citizenship. As I said before Senator Audens will be the last person I will ask the Senate to approve an exception for.

      Item II: Antiqvo. For over ten years this Senate list has been open between sessions for any Senator to bring before this body any subject that a Senator may choose to address. The items discussed still must make their way on to the Consuls agenda before a formal vote can be taken. If it is a good idea it usual does, if not, not. I believe that an open Senate list has served us well in all of this time and I am firmly against this proposal in its entirety.
      If an individual Senator or a group of Senators do not want to receive
      messages between sessions they can simply change their own Yahoo setting for this list to digest only. Those Senators who wish to discuss an item would be free to do so.
      Nova Roma needs more free and open discussions not less.
      During a formal session of the Senate the Consuls get to invite anybody they like to address this house and they set the agenda. Those Senators who wish to remain after a session to discuss whatever should be allowed to do so. By keeping this list open we have a permanent record of these informal discussions and can use these to determine if a given idea has merit or not.
      The Consuls are already moderators of this list per an agreement made during Censor Modianus Consulship on list ownership and moderation. The Senate list should remain under the ownership and lead moderation of the Censors as the Consuls have enough to do and enough power over this house as it is. The moderation of this house by the Censors,with the occasional assistance of the Consuls is one more check and balance within our system.
      I see no need to change what has worked for over ten years. For the record, both public and private, I have to add that I believe this recommendation of the Consuls is one more grab for power and another effort to silence anybody who has an opinion different than theirs.
      It should also be noted that this is the first pair of Consuls in Nova Roman history to have ask for the ability to silence the Senate in their own house.
      Consuls like Modianus and myself never asked for it. Consuls dealing with a civil war back in 1998 did not request it. For ten years no other Consuls have asked for this.
      I respectfully ask that ALL Senators vote against this measure for the freedom of speech you save today will be your own.

      MIP
      Item I: Vti. Rogas.

      Item II: Vti Rogas.

      GEC
      Item I: Vti Rogas. I do not understand why some people keep referring to this issue as if it is contrary to the law; the law has this clause specifically to enable this House to use its authority in precisely this manner. Allowing the waiver of the 90-day period IS PART of the law, not an "exception" to it or even particularly extraordinary.

      Item II: Antiqvo. The senators Iunius Paladius, Galerius Paulinus, and Iulius Caesar have expressed the matter to perfection.
      ADDENDUM to my comments on Item II, which I would like to put on record:
      There is constant reference to the Senate House in Roma Antiqua being
      "closed"; when I asked for specific primary sources to support this claim, none were given. In Roma Antiqua, the Senate could meet in any number of buildings or places, and did so. This is *not* an ancient practice, and to claim that it was for political purposes - is a gross misrepresentation of history.

      PMA
      Item I: Vti Rogas, in the unmodified frame of my general position and
      considering that Lex Minucia Moravia de civitate eiuranda itself allows (VIII.B) an exception whowe [sic] application is then decided by the senate. M. Minucius Audens, by his cursus and his realizations for the republic, is among the few ones who deserve such an exception.

      Item II: Vti Rogas. Our Senate must work as a true senatus romanus, under the watching of its presiding magistrates, with sessions where people may speak in, and off-sessions times, as in Ancient Rome, where the Curia is closed and several other places are available to senators for political discussions.

      MAM
      Item I: Vti Rogas.

      Item II:Abstineo.

      MHM
      Item I: Vti Rogas. For Senator Audens an exception should be made, he deserves it.

      Item II: Vti Rogas. The Curia must be closed between sessions as was done in Roma Antiqua. It is appalling when senators ignore the calendar, the PM who reminds them and chat in the Curia on days when they should be celebrating the feria. Our ancestors put the gods first; so must we.

      GIC
      Item I: Vti Rogas.

      Item II: Antiqvo. I said to some that "the first item needs no comment, and the second item deserves no comment". By that I mean that the first item is self-evident and the second , this item, not really a practical solution and therefore barely worth the effort of reply. Yet having read some of the comments here, I see why my good friend Palladius did comment.
      I too wouldn't have a problem with this, if this Senate was a functional body with a capacity and willingness to debate issues. A certain amount of insults, rock throwing and banter in posts is to be expected and if one has the proper perspective this shouldn't cause any more discomfort than a raindrop on the end of your nose, as long as the quantity is in moderation though. This isn't the case. Emotions run rampant all the time. Rarely can this house focus on an issue and dissect it and debate it, without succumbing to irrational fears, ludicrous allegations, and a general breakdown of common sense. Also, this Senate does not meet in a physical sense and therefore using the argument that the ancient Roman Senate met in locations sanctioned by religious ceremony to imply that somehow
      this non-physical list in cyber space can somehow be designated in the same way, and the same prohibitions apply, is ludicrous.
      I know that it is common-place to claim that the doom of Nova Roma is imminent - largely as a result of the discord here, and that "something must be done".
      Nonsense. Nova Roma will survive as it always has done. So what if some people quit the arena in a huff? That happens all the time, and frequently they come back, sometimes within days and they come from all sides of the political spectrum (well it would be days assuming we get the chance to vote on it promptly of course). Those that don't come back will be replaced. These are personal choices to stay or quit and most times they are fueled by emotional reactions. You can't legislate the causes of these incidents of quitting out of
      existence, for they are infinite and you can't legislate against personalities prone to this. Clearly many of you think the same way, even if you don't know it, for one person who provided an essential service - Octavius - departed without much hair pulling from some in office this year. As we have seen, this was someone who helped glue Nova Roma together (and we are currently obviously
      working out how to fill his very big pair of shoes - without any imminent signs of success I might add), as the majority of its business and future still rests
      in cyberspace, however much some of you may want to downplay that. If he can depart with barely a squeak of protest then the claims that people may leave and the house of cards will come tumbling down seems somewhat selective. I suppose people who say that doom is imminent really mean they or their friends will quit, if they really mean it at all and aren't simply using it as a convenient device to stir up public sentiment (rarely happens as the silent majority on the
      Main List remain silent) and create an atmosphere of fear, in order to nullify their political opponents. I see this proposal as either a reaction by one side to the opposition of the other, borne out of frustration and a complete loss of direction and control (which is really what this is about I suspect), or a deliberate effort to
      nullify their opponents. The supporting arguments are unconvincing. You want peace in this house? Start to debate issues. Start to dialogue with your opponents to secure your legislation. Do something really original and negotiate, in advance of putting changes to the people. Ensure you can pass constitutional changes before you bother us all with them, through the simple device of calculating support and taking steps to secure support if you don't initially have enough. Peace won't come by shutting down the one place where dialogue needs to happen, before, during and after formal sessions.
      Until many of you stop proclaiming the doom of Nova Roma is imminent unless measures like this are passed, until you cease the rather uninspiring and dull insults (at least be witty or cuttingly sarcastic instead of the witless gibbering about "rats" and the rest of the usual drivel that passes for an intelligent insult) and until you decide to give value to your proposals by negotiating for them, rather than turning up your noses at talking to your opponents, until all that happens this proposal can only be seen as either a forlorn hope to regain control of the situation by suppressing the very dialogue that is needed, or, an attempt to squash dissent. Neither option is worth supporting. One last thought, as with all repressive acts this could one day come back to bite all of you who support it, for it is predicated on having consuls you as individual Senators trust at the helm. One day you may find yourself facing two consuls who abuse the powers proposed. A shocking concept I know, entirely unknown in Nova Roma of course, but it may happen. Some may say
      it will happen, as sure as the sun rising and setting, and then what? By then it will be too late, having gifted so much power over this house, a house barely able to function. Stop looking to others to solve the problem and solve it individually.
      We need a collective resolve to solve our own issues, not a consular nanny service, putting us all to bed with no tea for being bad children.

      MIS
      Item I: Antiqvo. I think that besides the merits of a person, we must stop granting exceptions.

      Item II: Vti Rogas. The Senate has a purpose and a dignitas. The kind of conversations that we have witnessed lately is not for this House. We have several fora and we could create more, if needed.

      QSP
      Item I: Vti Rogas. Senator Audens is the backbones of Nova Roma as I
      previously mentioned and I do not hesitate to have him re-instated.

      Item II: Antiqvo. I respectfully ask that ALL Senators vote against this measure for the freedom of speech you save today will be your own. I agree with Censor Tiberi and could not have said this better myself.

      CFBQ
      Item I: Vti Rogas. I agree that M. Minucius Audens, is among the few who deserve this an exception, especially considering the circumstances during the decision to resign.

      Item II: Vti Rogas. I have been active in democratic assemblies since my teens and the bullies always thrive when there are no rules and the one who screams the loudest will always be the one who dominate the debate climate if discussions are not structured. As a chairman of many assemblies I would never tolerate the chaos that is the Nova Roman Senate. Those who teach how to lead democratic assemblies would just shake their heads to our Senate. With this proposal we may see more serious debate.

      GEM
      Item I: Vti Rogas. If Marcus Audens isn't deserving of an exception in this case, nobody is, ever was, or ever will be.

      Item II: Vti Rogas. If the members of this Senate conducted themselves as senators ought, this measure would not be necessary. However, they do not, and thus it is.

      ATS
      Item I (restoration of M. Minucius Audens' citizenship): Vti rogas. I, too, do not favor making exceptions the rule, but occasionally one should indeed make exceptions. This is one such case.

      Item II (new rules for the Senate): Antiqvo. While there are certainly members of this body who, like a student who just expelled himself before we did, require considerable external control as they are unable to restrain themselves, it seems excessive to impose this on all members of this body. Moreover, closing the curia (better known as its mailing list) while the Senate is out of session is counterproductive, and if anything, gives the consules more power as no one could speak up in between sessions. Perhaps certain members who are prone to emotional outbursts and the like should be moderated, but to me it is offensive for all of us to be dealt with as if we were naughty children or feeling the effects of excessive indulgence in assorted psychotropic drugs. The same could also be said about unjust moderation elsewhere.

      GVA
      Item I: Uti rogas.

      Item II: Antiquo.

      PUSV
      Item I: Vti Rogas!!! If we can not welcome Marcus Minucius Audens back, a gesture we should have made much, much sooner, then perhaps the critics are correct and Nova Roma is mortally wounded.

      Item II: Antiqvo. I have been reading both historical and well-researched historical, fictional accounts recently; the Senate Antiqua was, to my eyes, a rather rough house. I also agree that no
      documentation has been promulgated that supports closing this email list and allowing any "gagging" between or during sessions.

      TIS
      Item I: Vti Rogas. I think that M. Minucius Audens represent one of the few exceptions I can take in consideration when it comes about to waive the ninety day waiting period. That because his contributions to Nova Roma are unquestionable and greatest than the effects of his decision. My expectation is as M. Minucius to follow the romanitas he usually shows us and to wait ninety days as any ordinary citizen and to take the responsibility of his decision, despite what Censor Ti.
      Galerius, in his well known style entering nose in other people business, proposed to this August Body. It's up to M. Minucius.

      Item II: Antiqvo. I paid attention to all what my colleagues said about this item. Indeed, for some Senators, is necessary more discipline and focus to the specific subject of the items presented during the debates time of the sessions.
      It's normal as this to be accomplished through their own efforts as a continue process of understanding of the Roman moral values.
      With all of these, in the current political climate of Nova Roma, this item sounds to me not as a regulation of the Senate debates but as a restriction of the freedom of speech. The health of a Republic consists in the powerful voice of the political opposition. Without that opposition there is not any correct development and democratic progress.

      CFBM
      Item I: Vti Rogas. I think Audens should wait the 90 days, what is the rush? However, because of his accomplishments to Nova Roma an exception seems appropriate. Let his departure and desire to return a testament to thinking before acting.

      Item II: Vti Rogas. I'm not absolutely sure we need this proposal, but our dysfunctional culture needs to change and this might work. If it doesn't I'll gladly vote to have it removed.

      EIL
      Item I: Vti Rogas. Seven months ago, this body waived the waiting period for a senator who resigned out of anger. At that time, it was obvious that this exception to the law was flawed. It provided
      senators the ability to decide, solely based on their personal feelings for the resigned person, whether or not the true purpose and intent of the law should be enforced.
      The senator who resigned this time, did so out of a feeling of hopelessness mainly due to the lack of civility in this body. Marcus Minucius Audens has been one of our longest serving citizens and
      senators, and has contributed an enormous amount of time, energy and talent to growing and shaping this organization. Furthermore, his consistent good faith efforts have earned him the well deserved reputation of being one of the most honored and trusted of Nova Romans.
      This law should be modified to ensure that it can be applied fairly to all citizens. However, at this time, if any exception should be made under the current law, it should be made for someone as vital to Nova Roma as this citizen. Therefore, I am in favor of waiving the waiting period for Marcus Minucius Audens.

      Item II: Antiqvo. As the Senate is the governing body of this organization, there needs to be a line of communication open to its' members at all times in order to monitor the routine policies, actions
      and affairs of the state. However, I am in favor of placing those members unable to conduct themselves with decorum, especially with regard to controlling their emotions, be placed on moderation for a time to ensure that discussions do not devolve into unproductive or damaging rhetoric.

      MMPH
      ITEM I: Adsentior uti rogas. I agree entirely with Senator Palladius on this Item. Provision was made for the Senate to allow exceptions, and if Senator Audens is not worthy of an exception, then no one in this chamber should be considered worthy.

      ITEM II: Assentior uti rogas. There have been attempts made to have the Senate accept some code of conduct that would make our discussions here more civil. Rather ironically, those efforts have been led for the most part by Senator Audens whom we now consider
      to rejoin us. He has been opposed by the worst offenders, claiming that it is their right to say whatever they wish, to whomever, about whoever, in any manner that is suited to the gutters of society. This Senate is not the Back Alley. We should never have allowed the list for this august body to have fallen to such a state as breeds divisive factionalism. Those opposed to this measure as they
      see it aimed directly at their own abuses, are now joined by others with a reasoned concern that this Senate rule would be used to squelch dissenting opinions in the Senate. I think not. The aim is to make our discussions more orderly, under a model similar to that used by the Senate of Roma antiqua. It will allow all sides to voice their opinion so that all members may weigh the arguments given for or against an Item, and without all the fruitless exchanges of vile insults and counter insults, threats, lies, fabrications, and hyperbole aimed to disrupt discussions. I do not deny the concern expressed by some for the possible abuse of this Senate rule. Yet I believe we are all aware of this potential and thus shall guard against it, because no matter what side our individual members may consider themselves on, we share in the value of reasoned
      arguments freely presented. I believe that this Senate rule can be used to much improve communication within the Senate, and thus overcome the recent factionalism and build bridges between sides based on mutual respect.

      QFM
      Item I: Vti Rogas. Conscript Fathers, it is obvious that this law is flawed. While I understand people needing to get away from Nova Roma, because of personal crises, illness or work, to punish them because of this seems spiteful and asinine, not worthy of a Nova Roma which preaches tolerance to all.
      Senators that leave usually have a damn good reason to do so, and once whatever was forcing them to be inactive in NR is resolved they should have the ability to decide when they are ready to return. I remind the Conscript Fathers that membership to the marble bench is not elected by the people, but an assigned honor solely based on their merit, so the Roman people are not being disappointed by their elected choice. Marcus Minucius Audens explained why he left. The Senate must decide if we wish to re admit him to our ranks at this
      time. I say yes. I agree with Iulia Laeca that this lex needs to be modified.

      Item II: Antiqvo. We got along fine for X years without such. Why now? There is a need for lines of communication open to the Senate members so all can discuss if necessary the affairs of Nova Roma. Rhetoric was a part of the speaker's weapons, and we are not all stupid Yes men to the Consules, we all have our opinions and we retain our right to express those. If I did not know better I'd say that this was a veiled attempt to censor outspoken Senators. But
      I know better. So, we don't need this. Peer pressure is more then enough to keep the occasional boisterous Senator in line.

      FGA
      Item I: Antiqvo.

      Item II: Vti Rogas.

      CFD
      Item I: Vti Rogas.

      Item II: Antiqvo.

      DIPI
      Item I: Vti rogas. I usually am against exceptions and have voted against them in the past. I voted against Cato's exception, unlike many of the people who are now choosing badly and voting against Audens because they believe they made the wrong choice then. One must be able to show discernment and weigh the choices. We have exceptions for a reason, so that in extraordinary circumstances or for extraordinary people we may break usual practice. If Marcus Audens is not worthy of an exception, is not one of those exceptional Nova Romans, then not a single person in this body, not a single person in Nova Roma, is worthy.

      Item II: Antiqvo. If I thought this was being proposed out of concern for the Senate I would vote for it. I am not blind to the puerile behavior of people of every faction in these "chambers," especially of late, but let's be honest with ourselves. This is not a chamber of any kind but an email list and thus prone to the abuse of those who run it.
      My fear, which is quite probably justified, is that this item is not proposed out of any concern for the well being of the Senate or Nova Roma but rather it is meant to stifle dissenting voices and discussion of any kind, ESPECIALLY since part of the proposal states that senators will be moderated even during the contio. That is going too far. A vote for this item would be a vote to damage the Senate and Nova Roma.
      No legislative or deliberative body in the world, especially the ancient Roman senate, would put up with such a restriction. The ancient Senate was a pretty rough and raucous place, our Senate is quite tame by comparison in tone and language.
      These rules would in essence mean that every post would have to be approved by the presiding magistrate before they could be posted. Just think. If this were done in person each senator would have to quietly go up to the consuls, give them a copy of his remarks, and have them approved before he could speak. No senator should agree to put up with this! No other deliberative or legislative
      body would put up with it either unless in a dictatorship. This proposal is anathema to free speech.
      As far as the so-called religious arguments brought up for forbidding casual conversations between sessions, they are straw men and not very substantial ones at that. Any religious restrictions--none of which are listed as a reason for this proposal--only apply to meetings of the Senate. They do not apply to casual conversations on this email list between sessions. There has to be an open line
      of communications among members of the BOD.

      MLA
      Item I: Vti Rogas.

      Item II: Vti Rogas.
      Please record my votes on all items exactly the same as those of Princeps Senatus Caeso Fabius Buteo Quintilianus. With apologies to all members, I am now attending a conference and cannot devote more time.

      ECF
      Item I: Vti Rogas.

      Item II: Vti Rogas>
      Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71239 From: geranioj@aol.com Date: 2009-10-22
      Subject: Hic est Marcus Nonius Balbo
      Hic est Marcus Nonius Balbo, Amicii Augusti.  Ex Ercolano/
       
       
       
       
       
      Josephus

      Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71240 From: geranioj@aol.com Date: 2009-10-22
      Subject: Re: Latin Films
      Quod scripsi, scripsi,   ROMA RESURGENS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


      -----Original Message-----
      From: Cn. Cornelius Lentulus <cn_corn_lent@...>
      To: Nova Roma ML <nova-roma@yahoogroups.com>; Sodalitas Latinitatis <latinitas@yahoogroups.com>
      Sent: Wed, Oct 21, 2009 2:45 am
      Subject: [Nova-Roma] Latin Films

       
      Cn. Lentulus magister Sodalitatis Latinitatis omnibus sal.


      These are very useful films for those who want to learn (or simply to see and hear):


      https://www. ucl.ac.uk/ language- centre/Self- Access-Centre/ latin/Films- Streamed. php


      The Latin language is alive!

      Vivat lingua Latina!

      Vivat Nova Roma!



      Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71241 From: Cato Date: 2009-10-22
      Subject: a.d. XI Kal. Nov.
      Cato omnibus in foro SPD

      Salvete omnes!

      Hodiernus dies est ante diem XI Kalendas Novembris; haec dies comitialis est.

      "The praetor, T. Aemilius, put these demands to the senate, and they
      decided that the former treaty should be renewed with them. The reply
      given then by the praetor was to the effect that it was no fault of
      the Roman people that the friend- ship with them had not remained
      unbroken, and there was no objection to its being re-established since
      they themselves were weary of a war brought on them by their own
      fault. As to the Sidicines there was nothing to prevent the Samnites
      from being free to make either peace or war. After the treaty was
      made the Roman army was at once withdrawn. The men had received a
      year's pay and three months' rations, for which the consul had
      stipulated, that he might allow time for an armistice until
      the envoys returned. The Samnites advanced against the Sidicines with
      the same troops that they had employed in the war with Rome, and they
      were very hopeful of effecting an early capture of the city. Then at
      last the Sidicines took steps to make a surrender of themselves to
      Rome. The senate rejected it as being made too late and forced from
      them by extreme necessity. They then made it to the Latins who were
      already in arms on their own account. Even the Campanians did not
      refuse to take part in the hostile movement, so much keener was their
      sense of the injuries inflicted by the Samnites than of the kindness
      shown them by Rome.

      One immense army, composed of these many nationalities and under Latin
      leadership, invaded the Samnite country and inflicted more disasters
      by ravages than by actual fighting. Although the Latins proved
      superior in the various encounters, they were not loath to retire from
      the enemy's territory lest they might have to fight too often. This
      allowed the Samnites time to send envoys to Rome. When they were
      admitted to an audience they complained to the senate that they were
      suffering more now that they were in treaty with them than they had
      before, when they were enemies; they very humbly requested them to be
      satisfied with having snatched from them the victory they had won over
      the Campanians and the Sidicines, and not permit them, in addition, to
      be conquered by these most cowardly people. If the Latins and
      Campanians were really under the suzerainty of Rome they should exert
      their authority to keep them off the Samnite land, if they renounced
      that suzerainty they should coerce them by force. They re- ceived an
      ambiguous reply, for the senate shrank from acknowledging that the
      Latins no longer recognised their authority, and on the other hand
      they were afraid, if they reprimanded them, that they might alienate
      them altogether. The circumstances of the Campanians were quite
      different; they were bound not by treaty but by the terms of
      surrender, and they must keep quiet whether they would or no. There
      was nothing in their treaty with the Latins which prevented them from
      making war with whom they pleased." - Livy, History of Rome 8.2




      On this day the natural illumination of the inner sanctum of the
      Temple of Ra-Harakhte, known as Abu Simbel, occurs. The archaeological
      complex of Abu Simbel comprises two massive rock temples in southern
      Egypt, on the western bank of Lake Nasser, some 290km southwest of
      Aswan. It is part of the Nubian Monuments UNESCO World Heritage Site,
      which runs from Abu Simbel downriver as far as Philae (near Aswan).

      Ramses II, in a fit of precision and despotic architectural egotism,
      carefully angled his temple at Abu Simbel so that the inner sanctum
      would light up twice a year: once on the anniversary of his rise to
      the throne, and once on his birthday. The combination of human
      endeavour and natural phenomena provides what must be one of the most
      spectacular sights in the world.

      Crowds pack in to the temple before sunrise and watch the shafts of
      light slowly creeping through the stone. Eventually, statues of
      Ramses, Ra and Amun are illuminated in the inner sanctum (the statute
      of Ptah - the god of darkness - remains in the shadows). When they
      have recovered their breath, spectators can join celebrations outside,
      including a fair and music demonstrations. However, nothing can really
      impress you immediately after witnessing such a sight.

      The Abu Simbel temple was built by Ramses II (1279-1213 BC) to
      demonstrate his political clout and divine backing to the ancient
      Nubians. On each side of the temple, which was carved into a sandstone
      cliff overlooking the Second Cataract of the Nile, sit a pair of
      colossal statues of him, more than 65 feet tall. Though the statues
      have been damaged in earthquakes since their construction, they remain
      an awe-inspiring, tremendous sight. The temple is aligned to face the
      east, and above the entrance sits a niche with a representation of
      Re-Horakhty, an aspect of the sun-god.

      The greater Abu Simbel temple is generally considered the grandest and
      most beautiful of the temples commissioned during the reign of
      Ramesses II, and one of the most beautiful in Egypt. The facade is 33
      meters high, and 38 meters broad, and guarded by four statues, each of
      which is 20 meters high. They were sculptured directly from the rock
      in which the temple was located before it was moved. All statues
      represent Ramesses II, seated on a throne and wearing the double crown
      of Upper and Lower Egypt. The statue left of the entrance was damaged
      in an earthquake, leaving only the lower part of the statue still
      intact. Several smaller figures are situated at the feet of the four
      statues, depicting members of the pharaoh's family. They include his
      mother Mut-tuy, Nefertari, and some of his sons and daughters.

      Above the entrance there is a statue of a falcon-headed Ra-Harakhte,
      with the pharaoh shown worshipping on both sides of him. Below the
      statue there is an ancient rebus, showing the prenomen or throne name
      of Ramesses: Waser-ma'at. The facade is topped by a row of 22
      baboons, their arms raised in the air, supposedly worshipping the
      rising sun. Another notable feature of the facade is a stele which
      records the marriage of Ramesses with a daughter of king Hattusili
      III, which sealed the peace between Egypt and the Hittites.
      One of the eight pillars in the main hall of the temple, showing
      Ramesses II as Osiris.

      The inner part of the temple has the same triangular layout that most
      ancient Egyptian temples follow, with rooms decreasing in size from
      the entrance to the sanctuary. The first hall of the temple features
      eight statues of the deified Rameses II in the shape of Osiris,
      serving as pillars. The walls depicted scenes of Egyptian victories in
      Libya, Syria and Nubia, including images from the Battle of Kadesh.
      The second hall depicts Ramesses and Nefertari with the sacred boats
      of Amun and Ra-Harakhte.

      The sanctuary contains four seated statues of Ra-Harakhte, Ptah, Amun
      and Ramesses. The temple was constructed in such a way that the sun
      shines directly on all four statues during two days of the year,
      February 22 and October 22. These dates are allegedly the king's
      birthday and coronation day respectively, but there is no evidence to
      support this. Due to the displacement of the temple, this event now
      occurs one day later than originally.

      The Smaller Abu Simbel Temple is located north of the Greater Temple.
      It was carved in the rock by Rameses II and dedicated to Hathor, the
      goddess of love and beauty, and also to his favorite wife, Nefertari.
      The façade is adorned by six statues, four of Rameses II and two of
      Nefertari; most unusually, the six are the same height, which
      indicates the esteem in which Nefertari was held. The entrance leads
      to a hall containing six pillars bearing the head of the goddess
      Hathor. The eastern wall bears inscriptions depicting Rameses II
      striking the enemy before Ra-Harakhte and Amun-Ra. Other wall scenes
      show Rameses II and Nefertari offering sacrifices to the gods. Beyond
      this hall, there is another wall with similar scenes and paintings. In
      the farthest depths of the temple is the holy of holies, where a
      statue of the goddess Hathor stands.


      A thought from Plutarch:

      "O mortal men! Why do we assert that virtue is unteachable, and thus make it non-existent? For if learning begets virtue, the prevention of learning destroys it. Yet truly, as Plato says, just because a foot of verse is out of measure with the lyre and fails to harmonize with it, brother does not war with brother, nor does friend quarrel with friend, nor do states conceive hatred toward other states and wreak upon each other the most extreme injuries and suffer them as well; Dnor can anyone say that civil strife has ever broken out in a state over a question of accent, as, for instance, whether we should read Télchines or Telchínes, nor that a quarrel has ever arisen in a household between husband and wife as to which is the warp and which the woof. Yet, for all that, no one, unless he has received instruction, would attempt to handle a loom or a book or a lyre, though he would suffer no great harm if he did so, but he is merely afraid of becoming ridiculous (for, as Heraclitus says, 'It is better to conceal ignorance'); but everyone thinks that without instruction he will handle successfully a home, a marriage, a commonwealth, a magistracy — though he has not learned how to get along with wife, or servant, or fellow-citizen, or subject, or ruler!" - Moralia, "Can Virtue Be Taught" 2

      Valete bene!

      Cato
      Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71242 From: Cato Date: 2009-10-22
      Subject: Re: Sigh -- Smile And Economics of late paganism/Xtianism
      Cato Regulo sal.

      Salve.

      This is demonstrably incorrect, from primary sources: see Beard, North & Price pp. 25-30; Ando pp. 59-92.

      Valete,

      Cato



      --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "A. Sempronius Regulus" <asempronius.regulus@...> wrote:
      >
      > Salve,
      > Please refer back in the archives on Roman law: the public cults were only the traditional Roman cults on the Capitoline and Aventine mounts plus a few scattered around the city because the whole city was an altar.
      >  
      > All other cults were private (all Roman civil law that included religions was private law) even if an emperor endorsed it and used state funds to build a temple and coinage. The empire was legally a private and civil venture. There were two state banks: the Public, and the Imperial (which was the personal property of the emperors -- since Imperial Russia followed this legal tradition, the Russian bank was always public but the Russian Empire's bank was private property of the Czars -- which is why the newly found Soviet Union found itself bankrupt and why Marie Romanov returned to Russia under Yeltsin and Putin with a deal).
      >  
      > Vale,
      > ASR
      >
      > --- On Wed, 10/21/09, rory12001 <rory12001@...> wrote:
      >
      >
      > From: rory12001 <rory12001@...>
      > Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Sigh -- Smile And Economics of late paganism/Xtianism
      > To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
      > Date: Wednesday, October 21, 2009, 10:14 PM
      >
      >
      >  
      >
      >
      >
      > Salve;
      > thinking about it. It would seem money and power are the appeal in the Imperial choice. The state cultus deorum was decentralized, whereas I assume the Emperor controlled the christian cult, all the churches too so funds and power were centralized.
      > vale
      > Maior
      >
      > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com, "A. Sempronius Regulus" <asempronius. regulus@ ..> wrote:
      > >
      > > Salve,
      > > Yes, that is part of the equation but the public (polis) cults had a state stipend. Mystery religions were supported by their initiates -- who would mention the expense.
      > >
      > > But some cults were paid out of private funds and reimbursed. But, the temples had treasuries. All the votive gifts were the "divine's" property.
      > >  
      > > Vale,
      > > ASR
      > > --- On Wed, 10/21/09, C.Maria Caeca <c.mariacaeca@ ...> wrote:
      > >
      > >
      > > From: C.Maria Caeca <c.mariacaeca@ ...>
      > > Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Sigh -- Smile And Economics of late paganism/Xtianism
      > > To: Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com
      > > Date: Wednesday, October 21, 2009, 3:17 AM
      > >
      > >
      > >  
      > >
      > >
      > >
      > >
      > > Caeca Regulo sal,
      > >  
      > > I'm no expert, but somewhere I believe I read (no, can't reference it, sorry) that, at least in some cases, individuals or families sponsored (paid for) public ceremonies and major ...um ..events of a religious nature. I suspect this was more a feature of the Republic and early Imperial period, but I wonder how much of the costs involved in public ritual were born by private individuals or groups, and whether, as time passed, that practice abated to the point that it caused a financial problem for the State?
      > >  
      > > I'm also hoping that I'm not seeing my messages to the list as a result of new address moderation, and not because of my technical ineptitude.  If whoever is monitoring the list from the Praetorian (sp?) cohors is in a good mood, could you let me know if you, at least, are receiving them?  Not fussing, just ...unsure of my technical prowess. (well, I *am*, but you really *don't* want me to expound on *those* abilities, LOL!
      > >  
      > > C. Maria Caeca
      > >
      > >
      > >
      > >
      > >
      > >
      > >
      > >
      > >
      > >
      > >
      > >
      > >
      > >
      > > ____________ _________ _________ _________ _________ __
      > > Do You Yahoo!?
      > > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
      > > http://mail. yahoo.com
      > >
      >
      Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71243 From: luciaiuliaaquila Date: 2009-10-22
      Subject: Re: the Saturnalia thread
      Salvete omnes,

      This is a project from my Saturnalia plans. We've also decided to make the small clay figurines for the children who will then paint and decorate them. I also found several nicely made and well decorated 4 inch Roman soldiers which I will purchase for gifts (and I am also selling) - won't have time until next week to post them though.

      **********
      Saturnalia Project: How to Make a Bird Seed Wreath
      (From the Farmer's Almanac)
      Learn how to make a bird seed wreath with these simple instructions, and create something very special for the birds in your neighborhood!

      Gather some vines, dried sunflower heads, herbs, tall grasses, and flowers with seed heads.

      Start with a straw or vine wreath base, or make your own using grapevines, Virginia creeper, bittersweet (with or without the red berries), or branches from weeping willow.

      Attach medium-size sunflower heads all around the wreath, securing the flowers to the base with floral wire, if needed.

      Stick assorted flowers (coneflowers, zinnias, black-eyed Susans, or any others with a good supply of seeds) in between the sunflowers. Baby corn is another great addition.

      Finally, stick herbs and grasses all around, and you are ready to hang the wreath where the birds will find it and you'll enjoy watching them eat.
      ************

      Valete,

      Julia

      --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "rory12001" <rory12001@...> wrote:
      >
      > Maior Quiritibus spd;
      >
      > I'm throwing a Saturnalia party this year for my friends, and I started this thread to toss around ideas and later save them to the NRwiki for everyone.
      >
      > Since it's a mixed group of Latin lovers, cultores, friends, etc...I was thinking of mixing up some Mulsum, making some kind of Roman food (who doesn't like Italian food), music - maybe contemporary: Amy Winehouse, and perhaps maybe some Roman games. I'm not sure. I want it to be fun.
      >
      > Any suggestions will be gratefully appreciated; my friends have expectations, so I'd really like it to be great.
      > vale
      > Maior
      >
      Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71244 From: luciaiuliaaquila Date: 2009-10-22
      Subject: Re: Ancient Roman Shade
      Salvete omnes,

      In keeping with the title of the thread, and things "Roman"...and even the Christianity this thread (like many others) has morphed into, I offer this:

      "He [Plotinus] says, indeed, that the souls of men are demons, and that men become Lares if they are good, Lemures or Larvae if they are bad, and Manes if it is uncertain whether they deserve well or ill. Who does not see at a glance that this is a mere whirlpool sucking men to moral destruction?

      For, however wicked men have been, if they suppose they shall become Larvae or divine Manes, they will become the worse the more love they have for inflicting injury; for, as the Larvae are hurtful demons made out of wicked men, these men must suppose that after death they will be invoked with sacrifices and divine honors that they may inflict injuries. But this question we must not pursue. He also states that the blessed are called in Greek eudaimones, because they are good souls, that is to say, good demons, confirming his opinion that the souls of men are demons."

      Chapter 11. City of God, by St. Augustine
      Augustine of Hippo

      For those coming in late here is the article the thread was originally about:
      http://www.sott.net/articles/show/176522-Romania-Hotel-to-hire-medium-to-deal-with-resident-ghost

      Valete,

      Julia
      Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71245 From: D.O.A. Date: 2009-10-22
      Subject: Re: Invitation to Temple Of Venus et Dedication!
      Salve Iulia,

      Sounds really great, but is there more info somewhere? The link below wasn't
      very helpful. Is this a physical temple, or an organization?

      >P.S. Those who do not live close are welcome to join TOV and participate
      >online, please feel free to contribute, educate and enlighten!
      I'd be interested in info about how to participate online.

      Vale Diana

      ----- Original Message -----
      From: "luciaiuliaaquila" <dis_pensible@...>
      To: <Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com>
      Sent: Tuesday, October 20, 2009 6:39 PM
      Subject: [Nova-Roma] Invitation to Temple Of Venus et Dedication!


      Salvéte, amícae et amící omnibusque!

      You are cordially invited to attend the Temple of Venus Festival Dedication
      Reception on Sunday afternoon, 25Oct2009, at 2pm in Nashville, TN; for more
      details and to RSVP:
      http://www.meetup.com/Temple-Of-Venus/calendar/11148360/

      Aedes Venus Genetrix: the Temple of Venus is a sanctuary blending the
      ancient with the modern for those with different or alternative beliefs,
      providing activities, assistance and community outreach covering topics, and
      offering various workshops on ritual & ceremony, herbs, healing, education,
      arts, food, drink, mysticism, metaphysics, ancient/classical traditions,
      interpersonal relationships, tantra, intimacy, family , children and
      society, history, archeology, anthropology and pleasurable social
      activities.

      In addition to the Reception we have scheduled on Nov 8th a Workshop:
      Ancient Herbs/Oils for Health and Beauty Pt I.
      Also scheduled on December 19th a Holiday Feast: "Io, Saturnalia!"
      Saturnalia Festival & Opalia

      Our gatherings are a coming together of sacred human beings as a community
      engaging in, and seeking knowledge of, activities and topics that interest
      them as they did in ancient times at a central space, the Temple.

      Won't you please join us, we would be honored.
      http://www.meetup.com/Temple-Of-Venus/calendar/11148360/

      Cúráte ut valéatis atque di vos incolumes custodiant!

      In amicitia,

      L. Iulia Aquila

      P.S. Those who do not live close are welcome to join TOV and participate
      online, please feel free to contribute, educate and enlighten!
      Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71246 From: Cato Date: 2009-10-22
      Subject: Re: Ancient Roman Shade
      Cato omnibus in foro SPD

      Salvete!

      In keeping with the ... cough ... "spirit" of the thread, a story from Pliny:

      "Erat Athenis spatiosa et magna domus, sed infamis et pestilens. Per silentium noctis sonus ferri et strepitus vinculorum procul, tum e proximo auditi sunt. Mox apparebat senex macie et squalore confectus, qui barbam magnam et capillos villosos habebat; pedibus et manibus catenas habebat.

      Inhabitantes domus(gen) noctes diras et non somnum habebant. Morbus et etiam mors ex timore veniebant. Deserta et damna casa in silentio remanebat. Titulum positum est, sed nemo casam desideravit. Venit Athenas philosophus Athenodorus. Legit titulum, et pretio audito, multa rogat. Omnia audit, sed tamen casam capit.

      In vespera, Athenodorus lumen, stilum, et pugillares in prima parte casae posuit; tum omnes servos dimittit. Animum, oculos, et manum cum pugillaribus occupat, quod vacua mens multos timores fingit.

      Primo silentium est. Tum vincula procul audiuntur. Philosophus oculos non movet; stilo scribit. Soni in casa, tum in camera sunt. Athenodorus spectat; figuram videt. Senex stat et digito vocat. Athenodorus stilum iterum capit. Vincula audiuntur super caput. Nunc philosophus lumen capit. Senex tarde ad ianuam ambulat, et Athenodorus etiam ambulat post senem. In area casae senex philosophum deserit. Desertus philosophus in loco herbas ponit.

      Postero die magistratum vocat et magistratus locum effodit. Ossa inserta in vinculis invenit, et, collecta, publice sepeliuntur. Numquam iterum senex videbatur."

      "There was a big house in Athens, with an unsavory and unhealthy reputation. The silence of the night was interrupted by the sound of weapons and chains. First they came from afar, but then they were heard nearby. Soon there appeared a filthy, emaciated old man with scraggly hair and beard. He had chains on his hands and feet.

      The residents didn't sleep very well. Some even died from fear. Eventually the house was empty.

      Finally, deserted, it remained quiet. When it was put up for sale no one was interested.

      Then one day Athenodorus, the philosopher, came to town. He saw the FOR SALE sign on the house, learned the asking price, and asked a great many other questions.

      No one held back on the horrific details, but still the philosopher decided to go ahead and buy the place.

      That very evening, his first in the house, Athenodorus took a torch, stylus, and writing tablet to the front of his house. He let the slaves off for the night. Then he determined to keep himself busy writing because, he thought, an idle mind is the devil's playground.

      At first, all was still. Then from afar came the rattling of chains. Stoically, Athenodorus didn't even bat an eye, but kept on writing. The sounds grew closer and closer.

      Soon they were in the cottage....

      Then they were in his very room....

      At this Athenodorus laid down his stylus and looked up. There was the ghost. It beckoned him with a finger, but Athenodorus just took up his stylus again. When the philosopher heard the chains rattling above his head, he picked up his torch.

      Slowly the ghost ambled to the door with Athenodorus close behind. As it reached an open area in the house, the ghost disappeared. Athenodorus grabbed a handy nearby clump of grass and placed it on the spot where the ghost had vanished.

      The next day, Athenodorus called the magistrate. In his official capacity, he dug up the spot that had been marked. There they found chains and inside the chains, the bones of a man.

      The magistrate gathered the bones for a proper burial. Never was the ghost heard from again." (trans. N.S. Gill)


      Valete!

      Cato
      Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71247 From: rory12001 Date: 2009-10-22
      Subject: Re: Sigh -- Smile And Economics of late paganism/Xtianism
      Maior Regulo spd;
      I have no idea what he is referring to I just checked the Beard & North and it's a discussion of how pontiffs were magistrates, nothing to do with public vs private law.
      vale
      Maior


      >
      > Cato Regulo sal.
      >
      > Salve.
      >
      > This is demonstrably incorrect, from primary sources: see Beard, North & Price pp. 25-30; Ando pp. 59-92.
      >
      > Valete,
      >
      > Cato
      >
      >
      >
      > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "A. Sempronius Regulus" <asempronius.regulus@> wrote:
      > >
      > > Salve,
      > > Please refer back in the archives on Roman law: the public cults were only the traditional Roman cults on the Capitoline and Aventine mounts plus a few scattered around the city because the whole city was an altar.
      > >  
      > > All other cults were private (all Roman civil law that included religions was private law) even if an emperor endorsed it and used state funds to build a temple and coinage. The empire was legally a private and civil venture. There were two state banks: the Public, and the Imperial (which was the personal property of the emperors -- since Imperial Russia followed this legal tradition, the Russian bank was always public but the Russian Empire's bank was private property of the Czars -- which is why the newly found Soviet Union found itself bankrupt and why Marie Romanov returned to Russia under Yeltsin and Putin with a deal).
      > >  
      > > Vale,
      > > ASR
      > >
      > > --- On Wed, 10/21/09, rory12001 <rory12001@> wrote:
      > >
      > >
      > > From: rory12001 <rory12001@>
      > > Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Sigh -- Smile And Economics of late paganism/Xtianism
      > > To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
      > > Date: Wednesday, October 21, 2009, 10:14 PM
      > >
      > >
      > >  
      > >
      > >
      > >
      > > Salve;
      > > thinking about it. It would seem money and power are the appeal in the Imperial choice. The state cultus deorum was decentralized, whereas I assume the Emperor controlled the christian cult, all the churches too so funds and power were centralized.
      > > vale
      > > Maior
      > >
      > > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com, "A. Sempronius Regulus" <asempronius. regulus@ ..> wrote:
      > > >
      > > > Salve,
      > > > Yes, that is part of the equation but the public (polis) cults had a state stipend. Mystery religions were supported by their initiates -- who would mention the expense.
      > > >
      > > > But some cults were paid out of private funds and reimbursed. But, the temples had treasuries. All the votive gifts were the "divine's" property.
      > > >  
      > > > Vale,
      > > > ASR
      > > > --- On Wed, 10/21/09, C.Maria Caeca <c.mariacaeca@ ...> wrote:
      > > >
      > > >
      > > > From: C.Maria Caeca <c.mariacaeca@ ...>
      > > > Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Sigh -- Smile And Economics of late paganism/Xtianism
      > > > To: Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com
      > > > Date: Wednesday, October 21, 2009, 3:17 AM
      > > >
      > > >
      > > >  
      > > >
      > > >
      > > >
      > > >
      > > > Caeca Regulo sal,
      > > >  
      > > > I'm no expert, but somewhere I believe I read (no, can't reference it, sorry) that, at least in some cases, individuals or families sponsored (paid for) public ceremonies and major ...um ..events of a religious nature. I suspect this was more a feature of the Republic and early Imperial period, but I wonder how much of the costs involved in public ritual were born by private individuals or groups, and whether, as time passed, that practice abated to the point that it caused a financial problem for the State?
      > > >  
      > > > I'm also hoping that I'm not seeing my messages to the list as a result of new address moderation, and not because of my technical ineptitude.  If whoever is monitoring the list from the Praetorian (sp?) cohors is in a good mood, could you let me know if you, at least, are receiving them?  Not fussing, just ...unsure of my technical prowess. (well, I *am*, but you really *don't* want me to expound on *those* abilities, LOL!
      > > >  
      > > > C. Maria Caeca
      > > >
      > > >
      > > >
      > > >
      > > >
      > > >
      > > >
      > > >
      > > >
      > > >
      > > >
      > > >
      > > >
      > > >
      > > > ____________ _________ _________ _________ _________ __
      > > > Do You Yahoo!?
      > > > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
      > > > http://mail. yahoo.com
      > > >
      > >
      >
      Group: Nova-Roma Message: 71249 From: rory12001 Date: 2009-10-22
      Subject: Re: Sigh -- Smile And Economics of late paganism/Xtianism
      Salve Regule;
      lol, you are too funny.
      I'm just about to go to my latin circle, was busy working on my book all afternoon, was the law discussion you and Cordus had the 'de iure' one? I really want to read the archives now.
      optime vale
      Maior


      --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "A. Sempronius Regulus" <asempronius.regulus@...> wrote:
      >
      > Salve,
      > Cato's mistake is looking in religion sources instead of law sources. As usual, he is an idiot that assumes he is an expert. Cordus and I discussed this. It is in the archives..
      > Vale,
      > A. Sempronius Regulus
      >  
      >
      > --- On Thu, 10/22/09, rory12001 <rory12001@...> wrote:
      >
      >
      > From: rory12001 <rory12001@...>
      > Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Sigh -- Smile And Economics of late paganism/Xtianism
      > To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
      > Date: Thursday, October 22, 2009, 9:43 PM
      >
      >
      >  
      >
      >
      >
      > Maior Regulo spd;
      > I have no idea what he is referring to I just checked the Beard & North and it's a discussion of how pontiffs were magistrates, nothing to do with public vs private law.
      > vale
      > Maior
      >
      > >
      > > Cato Regulo sal.
      > >
      > > Salve.
      > >
      > > This is demonstrably incorrect, from primary sources: see Beard, North & Price pp. 25-30; Ando pp. 59-92.
      > >
      > > Valete,
      > >
      > > Cato
      > >
      > >
      > >
      > > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com, "A. Sempronius Regulus" <asempronius. regulus@> wrote:
      > > >
      > > > Salve,
      > > > Please refer back in the archives on Roman law: the public cults were only the traditional Roman cults on the Capitoline and Aventine mounts plus a few scattered around the city because the whole city was an altar.
      > > >  
      > > > All other cults were private (all Roman civil law that included religions was private law) even if an emperor endorsed it and used state funds to build a temple and coinage. The empire was legally a private and civil venture. There were two state banks: the Public, and the Imperial (which was the personal property of the emperors -- since Imperial Russia followed this legal tradition, the Russian bank was always public but the Russian Empire's bank was private property of the Czars -- which is why the newly found Soviet Union found itself bankrupt and why Marie Romanov returned to Russia under Yeltsin and Putin with a deal).
      > > >  
      > > > Vale,
      > > > ASR
      > > >
      > > > --- On Wed, 10/21/09, rory12001 <rory12001@> wrote:
      > > >
      > > >
      > > > From: rory12001 <rory12001@>
      > > > Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Sigh -- Smile And Economics of late paganism/Xtianism
      > > > To: Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com
      > > > Date: Wednesday, October 21, 2009, 10:14 PM
      > > >
      > > >
      > > >  
      > > >
      > > >
      > > >
      > > > Salve;
      > > > thinking about it. It would seem money and power are the appeal in the Imperial choice. The state cultus deorum was decentralized, whereas I assume the Emperor controlled the christian cult, all the churches too so funds and power were centralized.
      > > > vale
      > > > Maior
      > > >
      > > > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com, "A. Sempronius Regulus" <asempronius. regulus@ ..> wrote:
      > > > >
      > > > > Salve,
      > > > > Yes, that is part of the equation but the public (polis) cults had a state stipend. Mystery religions were supported by their initiates -- who would mention the expense.
      > > > >
      > > > > But some cults were paid out of private funds and reimbursed. But, the temples had treasuries. All the votive gifts were the "divine's" property.
      > > > >  
      > > > > Vale,
      > > > > ASR
      > > > > --- On Wed, 10/21/09, C.Maria Caeca <c.mariacaeca@ ...> wrote:
      > > > >
      > > > >
      > > > > From: C.Maria Caeca <c.mariacaeca@ ...>
      > > > > Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Sigh -- Smile And Economics of late paganism/Xtianism
      > > > > To: Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com
      > > > > Date: Wednesday, October 21, 2009, 3:17 AM
      > > > >
      > > > >
      > > > >  
      > > > >
      > > > >
      > > > >
      > > > >
      > > > > Caeca Regulo sal,
      > > > >  
      > > > > I'm no expert, but somewhere I believe I read (no, can't reference it, sorry) that, at least in some cases, individuals or families sponsored (paid for) public ceremonies and major ...um ..events of a religious nature. I suspect this was more a feature of the Republic and early Imperial period, but I wonder how much of the costs involved in public ritual were born by private individuals or groups, and whether, as time passed, that practice abated to the point that it caused a financial problem for the State?
      > > > >  
      > > > > I'm also hoping that I'm not seeing my messages to the list as a result of new address moderation, and not because of my technical ineptitude.  If whoever is monitoring the list from the Praetorian (sp?) cohors is in a good mood, could you let me know if you, at least, are receiving them?  Not fussing, just ...unsure of my technical prowess. (well, I *am*, but you really *don't* want me to expound on *those* abilities, LOL!
      > > > >  
      > > > > C. Maria Caeca
      > > > >
      > > > >
      > > > >
      > > > >
      > > > >
      > > > >
      > > > >
      > > > >
      > > > >
      > > > >
      > > > >
      > > > >
      > > > >
      > > > >
      > > > > ____________ _________ _________ _________ _________ __
      > > > > Do You Yahoo!?
      > > > > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
      > > > > http://mail. yahoo.com
      > > > >
      > > >
      > >
      >