Selected messages in Nova-Roma group. Dec 14-21, 2009

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72559 From: Titus Flavius Aquila Date: 2009-12-14
Subject: Tribuni Plebis: Report of the last Senate session ?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72560 From: rory12001 Date: 2009-12-14
Subject: Vox Romana podcast recruiting
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72561 From: Robert Levee Date: 2009-12-14
Subject: Re: Tribuni Plebis: Report of the last Senate session ?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72562 From: John Citron Date: 2009-12-14
Subject: Re: Pridie Eidus Decembres: CONSUALIA
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72563 From: Titus Flavius Aquila Date: 2009-12-14
Subject: AW: [Nova-Roma] Tribuni Plebis: Report of the last Senate session ?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72564 From: C.Maria Caeca Date: 2009-12-14
Subject: Re: new project
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72565 From: C.Maria Caeca Date: 2009-12-14
Subject: Re: new project
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72566 From: T. Annaeus Regulus Date: 2009-12-14
Subject: Re: Pridie Eidus Decembres: CONSUALIA
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72567 From: gualterus_graecus Date: 2009-12-14
Subject: Re: Pridie Eidus Decembres: CONSUALIA
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72568 From: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com Date: 2009-12-14
Subject: Posting rules in this Forum, 12/14/2009, 11:45 pm
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72569 From: John Citron Date: 2009-12-14
Subject: Re: Pridie Eidus Decembres: CONSUALIA
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72570 From: luciaiuliaaquila Date: 2009-12-14
Subject: Re: Vox Romana podcast recruiting
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72571 From: gualterus_graecus Date: 2009-12-14
Subject: Re: Pridie Eidus Decembres: CONSUALIA
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72572 From: Maxima Valeria Messallina Date: 2009-12-14
Subject: Re: apoloties to the forum
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72573 From: C.Maria Caeca Date: 2009-12-14
Subject: Re: apologies to the forum
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72574 From: T. Annaeus Regulus Date: 2009-12-14
Subject: Re: Pridie Eidus Decembres: CONSUALIA
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72575 From: T. Annaeus Regulus Date: 2009-12-14
Subject: Re: Pridie Eidus Decembres: CONSUALIA
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72576 From: Maxima Valeria Messallina Date: 2009-12-14
Subject: Re: apologies to the forum
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72577 From: Cato Date: 2009-12-14
Subject: Re: Pridie Eidus Decembres: CONSUALIA
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72578 From: David Kling Date: 2009-12-14
Subject: Re: Pridie Eidus Decembres: CONSUALIA
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72579 From: John Citron Date: 2009-12-14
Subject: Re: Pridie Eidus Decembres: CONSUALIA
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72580 From: John Citron Date: 2009-12-14
Subject: Re: Pridie Eidus Decembres: CONSUALIA
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72581 From: T. Annaeus Regulus Date: 2009-12-14
Subject: Re: Pridie Eidus Decembres: CONSUALIA
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72582 From: Marcus Iulius Scaeva Date: 2009-12-14
Subject: Re: Pridie Eidus Decembres: CONSUALIA
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72583 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2009-12-15
Subject: Re: new project
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72584 From: marcushoratius Date: 2009-12-15
Subject: a. d. XIIX Kalendas Ianuarias: Fortuna Reddux
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72585 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2009-12-15
Subject: Re: new project
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72586 From: Charlie Collins Date: 2009-12-15
Subject: Re: apoloties to the forum
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72587 From: Cato Date: 2009-12-15
Subject: Re: Pridie Eidus Decembres: CONSUALIA
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72588 From: Maxima Valeria Messallina Date: 2009-12-15
Subject: Re: apoloties to the forum
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72589 From: Ass.Pomerium Date: 2009-12-15
Subject: Mercoledi 23 dicembre: la mostra alle Scuderie del Quirinale "La pit
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72590 From: M•IVL• SEVERVS Date: 2009-12-15
Subject: A PUBLIC CALL TO THE FORMER TRIBUNES OF THE PLEBS
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72591 From: Titus Flavius Aquila Date: 2009-12-15
Subject: AW: [Nova-Roma] A PUBLIC CALL TO THE FORMER TRIBUNES OF THE PLEBS
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72592 From: T. Annaeus Regulus Date: 2009-12-15
Subject: Re: Pridie Eidus Decembres: CONSUALIA
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72593 From: David Kling Date: 2009-12-15
Subject: Re: A PUBLIC CALL TO THE FORMER TRIBUNES OF THE PLEBS
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72594 From: David Kling Date: 2009-12-15
Subject: Re: Pridie Eidus Decembres: CONSUALIA
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72595 From: Marcus Iulius Scaeva Date: 2009-12-15
Subject: Re: Pridie Eidus Decembres: CONSUALIA
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72596 From: gualterus_graecus Date: 2009-12-15
Subject: Re: Pridie Eidus Decembres: CONSUALIA
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72597 From: publiusalbucius Date: 2009-12-15
Subject: Adapting threads topics
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72598 From: rory12001 Date: 2009-12-15
Subject: Re: Pridie Eidus Decembres: CONSUALIA
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72599 From: David Kling Date: 2009-12-15
Subject: Re: Pridie Eidus Decembres: CONSUALIA
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72600 From: Cato Date: 2009-12-15
Subject: Re: Pridie Eidus Decembres: CONSUALIA
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72601 From: Cato Date: 2009-12-15
Subject: the current "discussion"
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72602 From: rory12001 Date: 2009-12-15
Subject: Saturnalia fun [was Pridie Eidus Decembres: CONSUALIA]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72603 From: Marcus Iulius Scaeva Date: 2009-12-15
Subject: Re: Saturnalia fun [was Pridie Eidus Decembres: CONSUALIA]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72604 From: Marcus Iulius Scaeva Date: 2009-12-15
Subject: Re: the current "discussion"
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72605 From: gualterus_graecus Date: 2009-12-16
Subject: Re: Pridie Eidus Decembres: CONSUALIA
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72606 From: rory12001 Date: 2009-12-16
Subject: Re: Saturnalia fun [was Pridie Eidus Decembres: CONSUALIA]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72607 From: C.Maria Caeca Date: 2009-12-16
Subject: Re: Saturnalia fun [was Pridie Eidus Decembres: CONSUALIA]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72608 From: rory12001 Date: 2009-12-16
Subject: Re: Saturnalia fun [was Pridie Eidus Decembres: CONSUALIA]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72609 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2009-12-16
Subject: Re: new project
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72610 From: Cato Date: 2009-12-16
Subject: Re: Saturnalia fun [was Pridie Eidus Decembres: CONSUALIA]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72611 From: Cato Date: 2009-12-16
Subject: Re: the current "discussion"
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72612 From: marcushoratius Date: 2009-12-16
Subject: a. d. XVII Kalendas Ianuarias: Saturnalia Eve
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72613 From: marcus.lucretius Date: 2009-12-16
Subject: Roman Days 2010 June 5, 6
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72614 From: publiusalbucius Date: 2009-12-16
Subject: Praetorial reminder to our orators
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72615 From: John Citron Date: 2009-12-16
Subject: Re: the current "discussion"
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72616 From: C.Maria Caeca Date: 2009-12-16
Subject: Re: new project
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72617 From: Marcus Iulius Scaeva Date: 2009-12-16
Subject: Re: Saturnalia fun [was Pridie Eidus Decembres: CONSUALIA]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72618 From: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com Date: 2009-12-16
Subject: SATVRNALIA, 12/17/2009, 12:00 am
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72619 From: rory12001 Date: 2009-12-16
Subject: Re: Saturnalia fun [was Pridie Eidus Decembres: CONSUALIA]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72620 From: C.Maria Caeca Date: 2009-12-16
Subject: Re: Saturnalia fun [was Pridie Eidus Decembres: CONSUALIA]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72621 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2009-12-16
Subject: Re: new project
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72622 From: Marcus Iulius Scaeva Date: 2009-12-16
Subject: Re: Saturnalia fun [was Pridie Eidus Decembres: CONSUALIA]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72623 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2009-12-17
Subject: Re: Saturnalia fun [was Pridie Eidus Decembres: CONSUALIA]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72624 From: luciaiuliaaquila Date: 2009-12-17
Subject: Io Saturnalia!!!! Joyous Saturnalia to all!!!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72625 From: luciaiuliaaquila Date: 2009-12-17
Subject: Re: Classic Poetry, Prose, Proems, Literature Excerpts
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72626 From: luciaiuliaaquila Date: 2009-12-17
Subject: Re: Roman Days 2010 June 5, 6
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72627 From: Titus Flavius Aquila Date: 2009-12-17
Subject: AW: [Nova-Roma] Io Saturnalia!!!! Joyous Saturnalia to all!!!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72628 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2009-12-17
Subject: More Saturnalia fun: jocí Latíné
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72629 From: rory12001 Date: 2009-12-17
Subject: Re: Roman Days 2010 June 5, 6
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72630 From: rory12001 Date: 2009-12-17
Subject: Re: Io Saturnalia!!!! Joyous Saturnalia to all!!!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72631 From: marcushoratius Date: 2009-12-17
Subject: a. d. XVI Kalendas Ianuarias: SATURNALIA
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72632 From: publiusalbucius Date: 2009-12-17
Subject: Re: a. d. XVI Kalendas Ianuarias: SATURNALIA
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72633 From: marcushoratius Date: 2009-12-17
Subject: Re: Io Saturnalia!!!! Joyous Saturnalia to all!!!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72634 From: marcushoratius Date: 2009-12-17
Subject: Re: Saturnalia fun
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72635 From: Marcus Iulius Scaeva Date: 2009-12-17
Subject: Re: Io Saturnalia!!!! Joyous Saturnalia to all!!!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72636 From: Titus Flavius Aquila Date: 2009-12-17
Subject: AW: [Nova-Roma] Re: Io Saturnalia!!!! Joyous Saturnalia to all!!!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72637 From: Lyn Dowling Date: 2009-12-17
Subject: Re: Saturnalia fun
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72638 From: marcus.lucretius Date: 2009-12-17
Subject: Re: Roman Days 2010 June 5, 6
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72639 From: L. Livia Plauta Date: 2009-12-17
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] More Saturnalia fun: jocí Latíné
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72640 From: iulius sabinus Date: 2009-12-17
Subject: Re: Io Saturnalia!!!! Joyous Saturnalia to all!!!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72641 From: iulius sabinus Date: 2009-12-17
Subject: Re: Saturnalia fun
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72642 From: Sabinus Date: 2009-12-17
Subject: Re: More Saturnalia fun: jocí Latíné
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72643 From: rory12001 Date: 2009-12-17
Subject: Re: Saturnalia fun
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72644 From: C.Maria Caeca Date: 2009-12-17
Subject: a bit of Saturnalia fun ...
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72645 From: C.Maria Caeca Date: 2009-12-17
Subject: Re: Saturnalia fun
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72646 From: marcus.lucretius Date: 2009-12-17
Subject: Re: Io Saturnalia!!!! Joyous Saturnalia to all!!!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72647 From: C.Maria Caeca Date: 2009-12-17
Subject: Re: Io Saturnalia!!!! Joyous Saturnalia to all!!!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72648 From: csentiusleoninus Date: 2009-12-17
Subject: Re: new project
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72649 From: Cn. Cornelius Lentulus Date: 2009-12-17
Subject: IO SATURNALIA!!! (Saturnalia in Pannonia)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72650 From: Cato Date: 2009-12-17
Subject: Re: Io Saturnalia!!!! Joyous Saturnalia to all!!!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72651 From: Cn. Cornelius Lentulus Date: 2009-12-17
Subject: Your Saturnalia Prayer
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72652 From: Marcus Iulius Scaeva Date: 2009-12-17
Subject: Re: Io Saturnalia!!!! Joyous Saturnalia to all!!!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72653 From: Cato Date: 2009-12-17
Subject: Re: Io Saturnalia!!!! Joyous Saturnalia to all!!!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72654 From: John Citron Date: 2009-12-17
Subject: Saturnalia Jokes
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72655 From: L. Livia Plauta Date: 2009-12-17
Subject: Saturnalia gifts
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72656 From: gaius_pompeius_marcellus Date: 2009-12-17
Subject: Io Saturnalia
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72657 From: mcorvvs Date: 2009-12-18
Subject: Re: Io Saturnalia!!!! Joyous Saturnalia to all!!!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72658 From: marcushoratius Date: 2009-12-18
Subject: a. d. XV Kalendas Ianuarias: Saturnalia, Eponia, Trebbia
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72659 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2009-12-18
Subject: Re: new project
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72660 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2009-12-18
Subject: Re: More Saturnalia fun: jocí Latíné
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72661 From: GAIUS MARCIUS CRISPUS Date: 2009-12-18
Subject: Re: new project
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72662 From: Cato Date: 2009-12-18
Subject: Re: new project
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72663 From: Cn. Cornelius Lentulus Date: 2009-12-18
Subject: Buy your Saturnalia gifts in the Nova Roman Amazon Shops!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72664 From: M•IVL• SEVERVS Date: 2009-12-18
Subject: IO TRIVMPHE! IO SATVRNALIA!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72665 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2009-12-18
Subject: Re: More Saturnalia fun: jocí Latíné
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72666 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2009-12-18
Subject: Re: new project
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72667 From: C.Maria Caeca Date: 2009-12-18
Subject: Re: new project
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72668 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2009-12-19
Subject: Re: new project
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72669 From: A. Decia Scriptrix Date: 2009-12-19
Subject: Re: new project
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72670 From: C.Maria Caeca Date: 2009-12-19
Subject: Re: new project
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72671 From: C.Maria Caeca Date: 2009-12-19
Subject: Re: new project
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72672 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2009-12-19
Subject: Offtopic: Bambi & Thumper
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72673 From: Marcus Iulius Scaeva Date: 2009-12-19
Subject: Re: new project
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72674 From: C.Maria Caeca Date: 2009-12-19
Subject: Re: new project
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72675 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2009-12-19
Subject: Re: new project
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72676 From: Gaius Petronius Dexter Date: 2009-12-19
Subject: Last report of the Senate session.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72677 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2009-12-19
Subject: Re: new project
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72678 From: marcushoratius Date: 2009-12-19
Subject: a. d. XIV Kalendas Ianuarias: OPALIA; Juventas
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72679 From: petronius_dexter Date: 2009-12-19
Subject: Re: Last report of the Senate session.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72680 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2009-12-19
Subject: Re: Last report of the Senate session.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72681 From: petronius_dexter Date: 2009-12-19
Subject: Re: Last report of the Senate session.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72682 From: petronius_dexter Date: 2009-12-19
Subject: Re: Last report of the Senate session.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72683 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2009-12-19
Subject: Re: Last report of the Senate session.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72684 From: rory12001 Date: 2009-12-19
Subject: Re: Last report of the Senate session.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72685 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2009-12-19
Subject: Re: Last report of the Senate session.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72686 From: rory12001 Date: 2009-12-20
Subject: Re: Last report of the Senate session.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72687 From: Cato Date: 2009-12-20
Subject: Re: Last report of the Senate session.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72688 From: petronius_dexter Date: 2009-12-20
Subject: Re: Last report of the Senate session.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72689 From: petronius_dexter Date: 2009-12-20
Subject: Re: Last report of the Senate session.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72690 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2009-12-20
Subject: Re: Last report of the Senate session.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72691 From: rory12001 Date: 2009-12-20
Subject: Re: Last report of the Senate session.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72692 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2009-12-20
Subject: Re: Last report of the Senate session.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72693 From: petronius_dexter Date: 2009-12-20
Subject: Re: Last report of the Senate session.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72694 From: petronius_dexter Date: 2009-12-20
Subject: Re: Last report of the Senate session.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72695 From: marcushoratius Date: 2009-12-20
Subject: a. d. XIII Kalendas Ianuarias: Bisaltia, Vitellius, and Vespasian
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72696 From: Gaius Petronius Dexter Date: 2009-12-20
Subject: Reporting of the Results of November Senate Meeting.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72697 From: Cato Date: 2009-12-20
Subject: Re: Last report of the Senate session.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72698 From: gaius_pompeius_marcellus Date: 2009-12-20
Subject: Correcting an Error
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72699 From: Maxima Valeria Messallina Date: 2009-12-20
Subject: Re: Offtopic: Bambi & Thumper [1 Attachment]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72700 From: Maxima Valeria Messallina Date: 2009-12-20
Subject: Re: Last report of the Senate session.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72701 From: petronius_dexter Date: 2009-12-20
Subject: Re: Last report of the Senate session.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72702 From: C.Maria Caeca Date: 2009-12-20
Subject: Re: Last report of the Senate session.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72703 From: petronius_dexter Date: 2009-12-20
Subject: Re: Last report of the Senate session.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72704 From: petronius_dexter Date: 2009-12-20
Subject: Re: Last report of the Senate session.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72705 From: rory12001 Date: 2009-12-20
Subject: Re: Last report of the Senate session.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72706 From: Cato Date: 2009-12-20
Subject: Re: Last report of the Senate session.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72707 From: petronius_dexter Date: 2009-12-20
Subject: Re: Last report of the Senate session.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72708 From: L. Livia Plauta Date: 2009-12-20
Subject: Re: Offtopic: Bambi & Thumper [1 Attachment]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72709 From: rory12001 Date: 2009-12-20
Subject: Re: Last report of the Senate session.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72710 From: marcus.lucretius Date: 2009-12-20
Subject: Re: Last report of the Senate session.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72711 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2009-12-20
Subject: Re: Offtopic: Bambi & Thumper
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72712 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2009-12-20
Subject: Re: Last report of the Senate session.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72713 From: Cato Date: 2009-12-20
Subject: Re: Last report of the Senate session.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72714 From: Marcus Iulius Scaeva Date: 2009-12-20
Subject: Re: Last report of the Senate session.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72715 From: Cato Date: 2009-12-20
Subject: Re: Last report of the Senate session.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72716 From: rory12001 Date: 2009-12-20
Subject: Re: Last report of the Senate session.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72717 From: Marcus Iulius Scaeva Date: 2009-12-21
Subject: Re: Last report of the Senate session.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72718 From: Gaius Petronius Dexter Date: 2009-12-21
Subject: [English version] Reporting of the Results of the Senate's Meetings
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72719 From: Cn. Cornelius Lentulus Date: 2009-12-21
Subject: Io Saturnalia!!!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72720 From: csentiusleoninus Date: 2009-12-21
Subject: Re: new project
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72721 From: Titus Flavius Aquila Date: 2009-12-21
Subject: Collegium Sodalitas proDIIS: Plurimas Gratias to the Senate of Nova
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72722 From: Marcus Audens Date: 2009-12-21
Subject: Fw: [newroman] IO SATVRNALIA!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72723 From: Cn. Cornelius Lentulus Date: 2009-12-21
Subject: Nova Roma Will Win!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72724 From: marcus.lucretius Date: 2009-12-21
Subject: Re: Last report of the Senate session.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72725 From: marcushoratius Date: 2009-12-21
Subject: a. d. XII Kalendas Ianuarias: DIVALIA
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72726 From: marcushoratius Date: 2009-12-21
Subject: Re: Last report of the Senate session.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72727 From: marcushoratius Date: 2009-12-21
Subject: Re: Last report of the Senate session.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72728 From: Maxima Valeria Messallina Date: 2009-12-21
Subject: Re: Languages (Was: Last report of the Senate session)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72729 From: Cato Date: 2009-12-21
Subject: language
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72730 From: Cato Date: 2009-12-21
Subject: Re: Last report of the Senate session.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72731 From: Cato Date: 2009-12-21
Subject: Re: Languages (Was: Last report of the Senate session)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72732 From: Marcus Iulius Scaeva Date: 2009-12-21
Subject: Re: language
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72733 From: petronius_dexter Date: 2009-12-21
Subject: Re: Last report of the Senate session.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72734 From: Ass.Pomerium Date: 2009-12-21
Subject: Un augurio di buone feste dall'associazione Pomerium - Merry Xmas an



Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72559 From: Titus Flavius Aquila Date: 2009-12-14
Subject: Tribuni Plebis: Report of the last Senate session ?
Salvete Tribunes,
 
we are still waiting for the report and the results of the last senate session. When will this report be distributed ?
 
During the last senate session important decisions were taken and we are eagerly waiting for the results to be published, especially concerning the
sodalitas proDIIS.
 
Valete bene
Titus Flavius Aquila
Collegium sodalitas proDIIS 

 

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Sie sind Spam leid? Yahoo! Mail verfügt über einen herausragenden Schutz gegen Massenmails.
http://mail.yahoo.com
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72560 From: rory12001 Date: 2009-12-14
Subject: Vox Romana podcast recruiting
M. Hortensia quiritibus spd;

Saturninus and I are getting more volunteers and looking for new ones to be: broadcasters, writers, production assistants for our podcast.

It's fun, wonderful, real, spreading Romanitas, and the cultus deorum everywhere. So please write to me if you are interested.

http://www.insulaumbra.com/voxromana/
bene valete in pacem Saturni
M. Hortensia Maior
Producer; Vox Romana Podcast
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72561 From: Robert Levee Date: 2009-12-14
Subject: Re: Tribuni Plebis: Report of the last Senate session ?
Salve brother Titus

Perhaps we can go back and piece this thing together and make the report ourselves as me being the reporting Tribune.What do you think?

Vale bene
For the Gods!
Appius

--- On Mon, 12/14/09, Titus Flavius Aquila <titus.aquila@...> wrote:

> From: Titus Flavius Aquila <titus.aquila@...>
> Subject: [Nova-Roma] Tribuni Plebis: Report of the last Senate session ?
> To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> Date: Monday, December 14, 2009, 3:01 PM
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>  
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Salvete Tribunes,
>  
> we are still waiting for the report and the results of
> the last senate session. When will this report be
> distributed ?
>  
> During the last senate session
> important decisions were taken and we are eagerly
> waiting for the results to be published, especially
> concerning the
> sodalitas proDIIS.
>  
> Valete bene
> Titus Flavius Aquila
> Collegium sodalitas proDIIS 
>
>  
> ____________ _________ _________ _________ _________ __
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Sie sind Spam leid? Yahoo! Mail verfügt über einen
> herausragenden Schutz gegen Massenmails.
> http://mail. yahoo.com
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72562 From: John Citron Date: 2009-12-14
Subject: Re: Pridie Eidus Decembres: CONSUALIA
Salve Cato,
 
What's the point of having power if it's not going to be put to "good" use?
 
Vale,
 
M. Iulius Scaeva
 
Divide et impera.    - Iulius Caesar
 

 



From: Cato <catoinnyc@...>
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Mon, December 14, 2009 10:16:17 AM
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Pridie Eidus Decembres: CONSUALIA

 

Cato Iulio Scaevae sal.

So rather than consider the bulk of my speech, you hone in on the most lamentable part of all - that a praetor would use their "power" to stifle the speech of a citizen based on personality - and celebrate it?

Unfortunate.

Vale,

Cato

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com, John Citron <johnnormancitron@ ...> wrote:
>
> Di Lauda!
>
> I can hardly wait for the new year to begin.
>
> Annus Paxis!

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72563 From: Titus Flavius Aquila Date: 2009-12-14
Subject: AW: [Nova-Roma] Tribuni Plebis: Report of the last Senate session ?
Salve brother Appius,
 
as much as I appreciate your offer to help, I am absolutely confident that you know as well, that only the Tribunes are allowed to work on these reports.
As much as I would like to help, especially to report on the results of the votes concerning the sodalitas proDIIS, I can´t , my hands are tied.
 
Vale optime
Titus Flavius Aquila


Von: Robert Levee <galerius_of_rome@...>
An: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Gesendet: Montag, den 14. Dezember 2009, 21:24:37 Uhr
Betreff: Re: [Nova-Roma] Tribuni Plebis: Report of the last Senate session ?

 

Salve brother Titus

Perhaps we can go back and piece this thing together and make the report ourselves as me being the reporting Tribune.What do you think?

Vale bene
For the Gods!
Appius

--- On Mon, 12/14/09, Titus Flavius Aquila <titus.aquila@ yahoo.de> wrote:

> From: Titus Flavius Aquila <titus.aquila@ yahoo.de>
> Subject: [Nova-Roma] Tribuni Plebis: Report of the last Senate session ?
> To: Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com
> Date: Monday, December 14, 2009, 3:01 PM
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>  
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Salvete Tribunes,
>  
> we are still waiting for the report and the results of
> the last senate session. When will this report be
> distributed ?
>  
> During the last senate session
> important decisions were taken and we are eagerly
> waiting for the results to be published, especiall y
> concerning the
> sodalitas proDIIS.
>  
> Valete bene
> Titus Flavius Aquila
> Collegium sodalitas proDIIS 
>
>  
> ____________ _________ _________ _________ _________ __
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Sie sind Spam leid? Yahoo! Mail verfügt über einen
> herausragenden Schutz gegen Massenmails.
> http://mail. yahoo.com
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Sie sind Spam leid? Yahoo! Mail verfügt über einen herausragenden Schutz gegen Massenmails.
http://mail.yahoo.com
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72564 From: C.Maria Caeca Date: 2009-12-14
Subject: Re: new project
Caeca Scholasticae omnibusque sal,
 
Indeed it does help, and thank you!  This will go into my folder, and on to my list, although for what I've got in mind, I'll shorten it just a bit although ...hmmm ...on second thought ...no, I won't! (grin). 
 
And now, Magistra mea, a question:  I'm *sure* Roman children played tag in some form ...it's a universal game, after all ...so how would one say "You're it!" 
 
Gratias tibi ago!  Next?
 
Vale et Valete optime,
C. Maria Caeca
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72565 From: C.Maria Caeca Date: 2009-12-14
Subject: Re: new project

Caeca Messalinae umnibusque sal,
 
Why think you, Amica, for doing my bit of editing for me!  I couldn't have done it better, and we've got 4 reasons, now!  21 (or more) to go!
 
vale et valete optime,
Caeca
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72566 From: T. Annaeus Regulus Date: 2009-12-14
Subject: Re: Pridie Eidus Decembres: CONSUALIA
Salve,
 
While I will wait until Maior has begun her magistracy before passing any judgments I certainly don't think the abuse of executive powers for the sake of 'good' causes is desirable. I find it hard to fathom your reasoning. What exactly attracted you to a recreationist organization of Republican Rome if you are a fan of censorship and autocracy? Debate and conflict are a part of any democratic structure and I for one think that Cato is generally one of the more topic-focused regular posters. He, rightly or wrongly, points out things that he disagrees with, and catalyzes the opinion of others. Even if he serves only as a lightning rod for those who oppose him to make a conscious decision on the 'correct' solution, he provides a valuable service to Nova Roma.
 
In my opinion Cato is often detail-oriented (read: nitpicky) and sensitive to the intentional jabs that are made at him (see your own posts in this thread for example). I wouldn't call myself a supporter of Cato, but do I think there's a constructive purpose to censoring him? Certainly not. Cato ran in an election and lost; clearly the majority of voters did not agree with him. That's democracy. It works. I think that is enough. He is still entitled to his opinions, and to share those opinions.
 
What I personally would like to see is people actually engaging in a logical debate (which I think Cato is attempting to do) without resorting to personal slurs or other logic-impeding devices. Perhaps it is laziness or a lack of time that causes people to attack Cato's person rather than his ideas, as he is a prolific poster, but I believe that it is behavior such as that that is actually creating the atmosphere of animosity that exists in Nova Roma. If I disagree with you, and you disagree with me, and we both disagree with Cato, while accepting that each of us is dedicated to improving Nova Roma as it exists to us, then we would be a much stronger organization. Having a variety of viewpoints is a strength. Bland homogenous thinking adds nothing.
 
Your posts in this thread do nothing to foster that sort of camaraderie. It is divisive, demeaning to Cato, and pointless. How do you justify your own behavior as you criticize Cato for his? I think we should be careful not to take sides based on personalities instead of issues. Whatever else I think about Cato, I think he is dedicated to Nova Roma and her wellbeing. For that reason alone he is entitled to a certain level of respect in my mind.
 
Just my two cents.
 
Optime Vale,
T. Annaeus Regulus

Sent: Monday, December 14, 2009 5:05 PM
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: Pridie Eidus Decembres: CONSUALIA

 

Salve Cato,
 
What's the point of having power if it's not going to be put to "good" use?
 
Vale,
 
M. Iulius Scaeva
 
Divide et impera.    - Iulius Caesar
 

 



From: Cato <catoinnyc@gmail. com>
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com
Sent: Mon, December 14, 2009 10:16:17 AM
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Pridie Eidus Decembres: CONSUALIA

 

Cato Iulio Scaevae sal.

So rather than consider the bulk of my speech, you hone in on the most lamentable part of all - that a praetor would use their "power" to stifle the speech of a citizen based on personality - and celebrate it?

Unfortunate.

Vale,

Cato

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com, John Citron <johnnormancitron@ ...> wrote:

>
> Di
Lauda!
>
> I can hardly wait for the new year to begin.
>
> Annus Paxis!

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72567 From: gualterus_graecus Date: 2009-12-14
Subject: Re: Pridie Eidus Decembres: CONSUALIA
Salve,

I agree with most of what you say, but I think it is precisely because people prefer to dislike him personally instead of logically engaging him that he will end up being censored. We've already see attempts to do exactly this during this year and I suspect efforts will be redoubled next year.

Vale,

Gualterus

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "T. Annaeus Regulus" <t.annaevsregvlvs@...> wrote:
>
> Salve,
>
> While I will wait until Maior has begun her magistracy before passing any judgments I certainly don't think the abuse of executive powers for the sake of 'good' causes is desirable. I find it hard to fathom your reasoning. What exactly attracted you to a recreationist organization of Republican Rome if you are a fan of censorship and autocracy? Debate and conflict are a part of any democratic structure and I for one think that Cato is generally one of the more topic-focused regular posters. He, rightly or wrongly, points out things that he disagrees with, and catalyzes the opinion of others. Even if he serves only as a lightning rod for those who oppose him to make a conscious decision on the 'correct' solution, he provides a valuable service to Nova Roma.
>
> In my opinion Cato is often detail-oriented (read: nitpicky) and sensitive to the intentional jabs that are made at him (see your own posts in this thread for example). I wouldn't call myself a supporter of Cato, but do I think there's a constructive purpose to censoring him? Certainly not. Cato ran in an election and lost; clearly the majority of voters did not agree with him. That's democracy. It works. I think that is enough. He is still entitled to his opinions, and to share those opinions.
>
> What I personally would like to see is people actually engaging in a logical debate (which I think Cato is attempting to do) without resorting to personal slurs or other logic-impeding devices. Perhaps it is laziness or a lack of time that causes people to attack Cato's person rather than his ideas, as he is a prolific poster, but I believe that it is behavior such as that that is actually creating the atmosphere of animosity that exists in Nova Roma. If I disagree with you, and you disagree with me, and we both disagree with Cato, while accepting that each of us is dedicated to improving Nova Roma as it exists to us, then we would be a much stronger organization. Having a variety of viewpoints is a strength. Bland homogenous thinking adds nothing.
>
> Your posts in this thread do nothing to foster that sort of camaraderie. It is divisive, demeaning to Cato, and pointless. How do you justify your own behavior as you criticize Cato for his? I think we should be careful not to take sides based on personalities instead of issues. Whatever else I think about Cato, I think he is dedicated to Nova Roma and her wellbeing. For that reason alone he is entitled to a certain level of respect in my mind.
>
> Just my two cents.
>
> Optime Vale,
> T. Annaeus Regulus
>
>
> From: John Citron
> Sent: Monday, December 14, 2009 5:05 PM
> To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: Pridie Eidus Decembres: CONSUALIA
>
>
>
>
> Salve Cato,
>
> What's the point of having power if it's not going to be put to "good" use?
>
> Vale,
>
> M. Iulius Scaeva
>
> Divide et impera. - Iulius Caesar
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> From: Cato <catoinnyc@...>
> To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Mon, December 14, 2009 10:16:17 AM
> Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Pridie Eidus Decembres: CONSUALIA
>
>
> Cato Iulio Scaevae sal.
>
> So rather than consider the bulk of my speech, you hone in on the most lamentable part of all - that a praetor would use their "power" to stifle the speech of a citizen based on personality - and celebrate it?
>
> Unfortunate.
>
> Vale,
>
> Cato
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com, John Citron <johnnormancitron@ ...> wrote:
> >
> > Di Lauda!
> >
> > I can hardly wait for the new year to begin.
> >
> > Annus Paxis!
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72568 From: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com Date: 2009-12-14
Subject: Posting rules in this Forum, 12/14/2009, 11:45 pm
Reminder from:   Nova-Roma Yahoo! Group
 
Title:   Posting rules in this Forum
 
Date:   Monday December 14, 2009
Time:   11:45 pm - 12:00 am
Repeats:   This event repeats every week until Friday January 1, 2010.
Location:   Rome
Notes:   Praetores omnibus s.d.

Please keep on mind the posting rules defined in the current Edictum de sermone Apr. 24, 2762 GEM-PMA, that you find in the Files section of this Forum, at:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma/files/Edicta%20de%20sermone/

Valete omnes,


Praetores G.E.Marinus and P.M.Albucius
 
Copyright © 2009  Yahoo! Inc. All Rights Reserved | Terms of Service | Privacy Policy
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72569 From: John Citron Date: 2009-12-14
Subject: Re: Pridie Eidus Decembres: CONSUALIA
Salve Regulus,
 
Why do you "say" you wouldn't call yourself a Cato supporter when your entire post was nothing mare a raving endorsement of him? 
 
Quite frankly, I stand by my comments.  Why, because whenever there is a major prattle going on in the ML, one can find Cato at the source.  I've seen it time and time again; ad nauseum.  Quam se ipse amans sine rivali!
 
Those continuing disturbances are not in the least constructive and are far more divisive than any import my commentaries may have had.
 
The coming silence will be golden.
 
Vale,
 
M. Iulius Scaeva
 
 


From: T. Annaeus Regulus <t.annaevsregvlvs@...>
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Mon, December 14, 2009 4:43:25 PM
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: Pridie Eidus Decembres: CONSUALIA

 

Salve,
 
While I will wait until Maior has begun her magistracy before passing any judgments I certainly don't think the abuse of executive powers for the sake of 'good' causes is desirable. I find it hard to fathom your reasoning. What exactly attracted you to a recreationist organization of Republican Rome if you are a fan of censorship and autocracy? Debate and conflict are a part of any democratic structure and I for one think that Cato is generally one of the more topic-focused regular posters. He, rightly or wrongly, points out things that he disagrees with, and catalyzes the opinion of others. Even if he serves only as a lightning rod for those who oppose him to make a conscious decision on the 'correct' solution, he provides a valuable service to Nova Roma.
 
In my opinion Cato is often detail-oriented (read: nitpicky) and sensitive to the intentional jabs that are made at him (see your own posts in this thread for example). I wouldn't call myself a supporter of Cato, but do I think there's a constructive purpose to censoring him? Certainly not. Cato ran in an election and lost; clearly the majority of voters did not agree with him. That's democracy. It works. I think that is enough. He is still entitled to his opinions, and to share those opinions.
 
What I personally would like to see is people actually engaging in a logical debate (which I think Cato is attempting to do) without resorting to personal slurs or other logic-impeding devices. Perhaps it is laziness or a lack of time that causes people to attack Cato's person rather than his ideas, as he is a prolific poster, but I believe that it is behavior such as that that is actually creating the atmosphere of animosity that exists in Nova Roma. If I disagree with you, and you disagree with me, and we both disagree with Cato, while accepting that each of us is dedicated to improving Nova Roma as it exists to us, then we would be a much stronger organization. Having a variety of viewpoints is a strength. Bland homogenous thinking adds nothing.
 
Your posts in this thread do nothing to foster that sort of camaraderie. It is divisive, demeaning to Cato, and pointless. How do you justify your own behavior as you criticize Cato for his? I think we should be careful not to take sides based on personalities instead of issues. Whatever else I think about Cato, I think he is dedicated to Nova Roma and her wellbeing. For that reason alone he is entitled to a certain level of respect in my mind.
 
Just my two cents.
 
Optime Vale,
T. Annaeus Regulus

Sent: Monday, December 14, 2009 5:05 PM
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: Pridie Eidus Decembres: CONSUALIA

 

Salve Cato,
 
What's the point of having power if it's not going to be put to "good" use?
 
Vale,
 
M. Iulius Scaeva
 
Divide et impera.    - Iulius Caesar
 

 



From: Cato <catoinnyc@gmail. com>
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com
Sent: Mon, December 14, 2009 10:16:17 AM
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Pridie Eidus Decembres: CONSUALIA

 

Cato Iulio Scaevae sal.

So rather than consider the bulk of my speech, you hone in on the most lamentable part of all - that a praetor would use their "power" to stifle the speech of a citizen based on personality - and celebrate it?

Unfortunate.

Vale,

Cato

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com, John Citron <johnnormancitron@ ...> wrote:
>
> Di Lauda!
>
> I can hardly wait for the new year to begin.
>
> Annus Paxis!

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72570 From: luciaiuliaaquila Date: 2009-12-14
Subject: Re: Vox Romana podcast recruiting
Salve Maior amica,

I would volunteer for an English speaking part but my accent is a bit southern at times:)- I also may be a bit dramatic..
Let me know if you need some help reading, writing but not arithmetic:)

Optime vale in pace Saturni,
Julia

P.S. I know I have not been around much, most time I have to spare is for sleeping:) but I am checking in and I just got my headset and trying to figure out how to hook us all up on the 19th!

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "rory12001" <rory12001@...> wrote:
>
> M. Hortensia quiritibus spd;
>
> Saturninus and I are getting more volunteers and looking for new ones to be: broadcasters, writers, production assistants for our podcast.
>
> It's fun, wonderful, real, spreading Romanitas, and the cultus deorum everywhere. So please write to me if you are interested.
>
> http://www.insulaumbra.com/voxromana/
> bene valete in pacem Saturni
> M. Hortensia Maior
> Producer; Vox Romana Podcast
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72571 From: gualterus_graecus Date: 2009-12-14
Subject: Re: Pridie Eidus Decembres: CONSUALIA
I think it was pretty clear that what Regulus was supporting was the act of voicing diverse opinions and being free to argue about them and not endorsing Cato's specific opinions. I would go one step further and suspect that Regulus would agree that an organization that is completely silent is either moving in the wrong direction or is dead.

-GG

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, John Citron <johnnormancitron@...> wrote:
>
> Salve Regulus,
>
> Why do you "say" you wouldn't call yourself a Cato supporter when your entire post was nothing mare a raving endorsement of him? 
>
> Quite frankly, I stand by my comments.  Why, because whenever there is a major prattle going on in the ML, one can find Cato at the source.  I've seen it time and time again; ad nauseum.  Quam se ipse amans sine rivali!
>
> Those continuing disturbances are not in the least constructive and are far more divisive than any import my commentaries may have had.
>
> The coming silence will be golden.
>
> Vale,
>
> M. Iulius Scaeva
>  
>
>
>
>
> ________________________________
> From: T. Annaeus Regulus <t.annaevsregvlvs@...>
> To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Mon, December 14, 2009 4:43:25 PM
> Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: Pridie Eidus Decembres: CONSUALIA
>
>  
> Salve,
>  
> While I will wait until Maior has begun her magistracy before passing any judgments I certainly don't think the abuse of executive powers for the sake of 'good' causes is desirable. I find it hard to fathom your reasoning. What exactly attracted you to a recreationist organization of Republican Rome if you are a fan of censorship and autocracy? Debate and conflict are a part of any democratic structure and I for one think that Cato is generally one of the more topic-focused regular posters. He, rightly or wrongly, points out things that he disagrees with, and catalyzes the opinion of others. Even if he serves only as a lightning rod for those who oppose him to make a conscious decision on the 'correct' solution, he provides a valuable service to Nova Roma.
>  
> In my opinion Cato is often detail-oriented (read: nitpicky) and sensitive to the intentional jabs that are made at him (see your own posts in this thread for example). I wouldn't call myself a supporter of Cato, but do I think there's a constructive purpose to censoring him? Certainly not. Cato ran in an election and lost; clearly the majority of voters did not agree with him. That's democracy. It works. I think that is enough. He is still entitled to his opinions, and to share those opinions.
>  
> What I personally would like to see is people actually engaging in a logical debate (which I think Cato is attempting to do) without resorting to personal slurs or other logic-impeding devices. Perhaps it is laziness or a lack of time that causes people to attack Cato's person rather than his ideas, as he is a prolific poster, but I believe that it is behavior such as that that is actually creating the atmosphere of animosity that exists in Nova Roma. If I disagree with you, and you disagree with me, and we both disagree with Cato, while accepting that each of us is dedicated to improving Nova Roma as it exists to us, then we would be a much stronger organization. Having a variety of viewpoints is a strength. Bland homogenous thinking adds nothing.
>  
> Your posts in this thread do nothing to foster that sort of camaraderie. It is divisive, demeaning to Cato, and pointless. How do you justify your own behavior as you criticize Cato for his? I think we should be careful not to take sides based on personalities instead of issues. Whatever else I think about Cato, I think he is dedicated to Nova Roma and her wellbeing. For that reason alone he is entitled to a certain level of respect in my mind.
>  
> Just my two cents.
>  
> Optime Vale,
> T. Annaeus Regulus
>
>
> From: John Citron
> Sent: Monday, December 14, 2009 5:05 PM
> To: Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com
> Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: Pridie Eidus Decembres: CONSUALIA
>  
> Salve Cato,
>
> What's the point of having power if it's not going to be put to "good" use?
>
> Vale,
>
> M. Iulius Scaeva
>
> Divide et impera.    - Iulius Caesar
>  
>  
>
>
>
>
> ________________________________
> From: Cato <catoinnyc@gmail. com>
> To: Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com
> Sent: Mon, December 14, 2009 10:16:17 AM
> Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Pridie Eidus Decembres: CONSUALIA
>
>  
> Cato Iulio Scaevae sal.
>
> So rather than consider the bulk of my speech, you hone in on the most lamentable part of all - that a praetor would use their "power" to stifle the speech of a citizen based on personality - and celebrate it?
>
> Unfortunate.
>
> Vale,
>
> Cato
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com, John Citron <johnnormancitron@ ...> wrote:
> >
> > Di Lauda!
> >
> > I can hardly wait for the new year to begin.
> >
> > Annus Paxis!
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72572 From: Maxima Valeria Messallina Date: 2009-12-14
Subject: Re: apoloties to the forum
Hey, we all need help now and then with the techno stuff. Don't aplogize or we'll all have to. LOL
Didn't there use to be, or maybe still is, a Nova Roma Computer list? I seem to remember that. Anybody know?
 
Maxima Valeria Messallina


--- On Mon, 12/7/09, C.Maria Caeca <c.mariacaeca@...> wrote:

From: C.Maria Caeca <c.mariacaeca@...>
Subject: [Nova-Roma] apoloties to the forum
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Date: Monday, December 7, 2009, 10:26 PM

 
Salvete omnes,

My apologies to the list. I have found help resolving my issues, and will,
of course, not trouble this forum with such inappropriate trivia again.

Respectfully,
C. Maria Caeca


Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72573 From: C.Maria Caeca Date: 2009-12-14
Subject: Re: apologies to the forum

Caeca Messalinae omnibusque sal,
 
Um, are you referring to the NR WIKI list?  It was always my impression that that list dealt with WIKI issues, including technical ones like editing, etc.  I never thought it was intended for general questions.  I guess I just didn't think, because I was neck deep in doing my midterm, got myself into a mess, and automatically went running to the community I thought would be the most likely to understand, shrug.
 
Vale et valete bene,
C. Maria Caeca
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72574 From: T. Annaeus Regulus Date: 2009-12-14
Subject: Re: Pridie Eidus Decembres: CONSUALIA
Salve,
 
It was no endorsement. The fact that I am not willing to make a blanket statement as to the value of someone's contributions does not make me a raving endorser of what he has to say. Simply put, the removal of dissenting voices allows for the creation of potentially unhealthy paradigms within Nova Roma. Without Cato criticizing and putting forward what he thinks, our vision is narrowed. If you allow moderators the power to silence those who you disagree with, then you can easily achieve an aggregate narrowing of vision as all who disagree are silenced. The idea that one person in this group has the ability to judge the value of someone else's contribution is one that I disagree with, plain and simple. Nothing particular about Cato, it is the principle I object to.
 
I firmly believe that it takes two to tango. Although Cato is often the source of 'major prattle,' it typically starts as an earnest suggestion, criticism or question to improve us in my experience. Ignoring Cato is possible; addressing him on the issues is possible; there are many possible responses. Hostility and the descent into 'prattle' is an unfortunate one and by no means something that I would blame solely on Cato. I fully recognize that he posts a lot. If one views him as an adversary then that must be frustrating, it being very difficult to keep up. You suggest ways to remove this adversary so that others won't be prone to 'prattle.' I instead would suggest that citizens here change their point of view. Whether or not Cato's views have merit they should be listened to and rebutted, or at worst dismissed as rubbish. Personal attacks get us nowhere, and it the authors of these that are truly our biggest problem in my opinion. Here I would consider Cato's responding in kind to be a breach of appropriate conduct, to assure you I do not ravingly endorse him. ; )
 
We are a team and all working towards a common goal. Differences in methodology should not affect our mutual commitment to our strategic objectives. I fully expect that our praetors will be cognizant of our personal liberties when performing their duties.
 
Vale,
T. Annaeus Regulus

Sent: Monday, December 14, 2009 6:54 PM
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: Pridie Eidus Decembres: CONSUALIA

 

Salve Regulus,
 
Why do you "say" you wouldn't call yourself a Cato supporter when your entire post was nothing mare a raving endorsement of him? 
 
Quite frankly, I stand by my comments.  Why, because whenever there is a major prattle going on in the ML, one can find Cato at the source.  I've seen it time and time again; ad nauseum.  Quam se ipse amans sine rivali!
 
Those continuing disturbances are not in the least constructive and are far more divisive than any import my commentaries may have had.
 
The coming silence will be golden.
 
Vale,
 
M. Iulius Scaeva
 
 


From: T. Annaeus Regulus <t.annaevsregvlvs@ ymail.com>
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com
Sent: Mon, December 14, 2009 4:43:25 PM
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: Pridie Eidus Decembres: CONSUALIA

 

Salve,
 
While I will wait until Maior has begun her magistracy before passing any judgments I certainly don't think the abuse of executive powers for the sake of 'good' causes is desirable. I find it hard to fathom your reasoning. What exactly attracted you to a recreationist organization of Republican Rome if you are a fan of censorship and autocracy? Debate and conflict are a part of any democratic structure and I for one think that Cato is generally one of the more topic-focused regular posters. He, rightly or wrongly, points out things that he disagrees with, and catalyzes the opinion of others. Even if he serves only as a lightning rod for those who oppose him to make a conscious decision on the 'correct' solution, he provides a valuable service to Nova Roma.
 
In my opinion Cato is often detail-oriented (read: nitpicky) and sensitive to the intentional jabs that are made at him (see your own posts in this thread for example). I wouldn't call myself a supporter of Cato, but do I think there's a constructive purpose to censoring him? Certainly not. Cato ran in an election and lost; clearly the majority of voters did not agree with him. That's democracy. It works. I think that is enough. He is still entitled to his opinions, and to share those opinions.
 
What I personally would like to see is people actually engaging in a logical debate (which I think Cato is attempting to do) without resorting to personal slurs or other logic-impeding devices. Perhaps it is laziness or a lack of time that causes people to attack Cato's person rather than his ideas, as he is a prolific poster, but I believe that it is behavior such as that that is actually creating the atmosphere of animosity that exists in Nova Roma. If I disagree with you, and you disagree with me, and we both disagree with Cato, while accepting that each of us is dedicated to improving Nova Roma as it exists to us, then we would be a much stronger organization. Having a variety of viewpoints is a strength. Bland homogenous thinking adds nothing.
 
Your posts in this thread do nothing to foster that sort of camaraderie. It is divisive, demeaning to Cato, and pointless. How do you justify your own behavior as you criticize Cato for his? I think we should be careful not to take sides based on personalities instead of issues. Whatever else I think about Cato, I think he is dedicated to Nova Roma and her wellbeing. For that reason alone he is entitled to a certain level of respect in my mind.
 
Just my two cents.
 
Optime Vale,
T. Annaeus Regulus

Sent: Monday, December 14, 2009 5:05 PM
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: Pridie Eidus Decembres: CONSUALIA

 

Salve Cato,
 
What's the point of having power if it's not going to be put to "good" use?
 
Vale,
 
M. Iulius Scaeva
 
Divide et impera.    - Iulius Caesar
 

 



From: Cato <catoinnyc@gmail. com>
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com
Sent: Mon, December 14, 2009 10:16:17 AM
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Pridie Eidus Decembres: CONSUALIA

 

Cato Iulio Scaevae sal.

So rather than consider the bulk of my speech, you hone in on the most lamentable part of all - that a praetor would use their "power" to stifle the speech of a citizen based on personality - and celebrate it?

Unfortunate.

Vale,

Cato

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com, John Citron <johnnormancitron@ ...> wrote:

>
> Di
Lauda!
>
> I can hardly wait for the new year to begin.
>
> Annus Paxis!

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72575 From: T. Annaeus Regulus Date: 2009-12-14
Subject: Re: Pridie Eidus Decembres: CONSUALIA
Precisely Gualterus. I could have saved my fingers some work if I had read this first!
 
Regulus

Sent: Monday, December 14, 2009 8:36 PM
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Pridie Eidus Decembres: CONSUALIA

 


I think it was pretty clear that what Regulus was supporting was the act of voicing diverse opinions and being free to argue about them and not endorsing Cato's specific opinions. I would go one step further and suspect that Regulus would agree that an organization that is completely silent is either moving in the wrong direction or is dead.

-GG

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com, John Citron <johnnormancitron@ ...> wrote:

>
> Salve
Regulus,
>
> Why do you "say" you wouldn't call yourself a
Cato supporter when your entire post was nothing mare a raving endorsement of him? 
>
> Quite frankly, I stand by my comments. 
Why, because whenever there is a major prattle going on in the ML, one can find Cato at the source. Â I've seen it time and time again; ad nauseum.  Quam se ipse amans sine rivali!
>
> Those
continuing disturbances  are not in the least constructive and are far more divisive than any import my commentaries may have had.
>
> The coming silence will be golden.
>
>
Vale,
>
> M. Iulius Scaeva
>  
>
>
>
>
>
____________ _________ _________ __
> From: T. Annaeus Regulus
<t.annaevsregvlvs@ ...>
> To:
href="mailto:Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com">Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com
>
Sent: Mon, December 14, 2009 4:43:25 PM
> Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Re:
Pridie Eidus Decembres: CONSUALIA
>
>  
>
Salve,
>  
> While I will wait until Maior has begun her
magistracy before passing any judgments I certainly don't think the abuse of executive powers for the sake of 'good' causes is desirable. I find it hard to fathom your reasoning. What exactly attracted you to a recreationist organization of Republican Rome if you are a fan of censorship and autocracy? Debate and conflict are a part of any democratic structure and I for one think that Cato is generally one of the more topic-focused regular posters. He, rightly or wrongly, points out things that he disagrees with, and catalyzes the opinion of others. Even if he serves only as a lightning rod for those who oppose him to make a conscious decision on the 'correct' solution, he provides a valuable service to Nova Roma.
>  
> In my opinion
Cato is often detail-oriented (read: nitpicky) and sensitive to the intentional jabs that are made at him (see your own posts in this thread for example). I wouldn't call myself a supporter of Cato, but do I think there's a constructive purpose to censoring him? Certainly not. Cato ran in an election and lost; clearly the majority of voters did not agree with him. That's democracy. It works. I think that is enough. He is still entitled to his opinions, and to share those opinions.
>  
> What I personally
would like to see is people actually engaging in a logical debate (which I think Cato is attempting to do) without resorting to personal slurs or other logic-impeding devices. Perhaps it is laziness or a lack of time that causes people to attack Cato's person rather than his ideas, as he is a prolific poster, but I believe that it is behavior such as that that is actually creating the atmosphere of animosity that exists in Nova Roma. If I disagree with you, and you disagree with me, and we both disagree with Cato, while accepting that each of us is dedicated to improving Nova Roma as it exists to us, then we would be a much stronger organization. Having a variety of viewpoints is a strength. Bland homogenous thinking adds nothing.
>
 
> Your posts in this thread do nothing to foster that sort
of camaraderie. It is divisive, demeaning to Cato, and pointless. How do you justify your own behavior as you criticize Cato for his? I think we should be careful not to take sides based on personalities instead of issues. Whatever else I think about Cato, I think he is dedicated to Nova Roma and her wellbeing. For that reason alone he is entitled to a certain level of respect in my mind.
>  
> Just my two cents.
>  
> Optime
Vale,
> T. Annaeus Regulus
>
>
> From: John Citron
> Sent: Monday, December 14, 2009 5:05 PM
> To: Nova-Roma@yahoogrou
ps.com
> Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: Pridie Eidus Decembres:
CONSUALIA
>  
> Salve Cato,
>
> What's the
point of having power if it's not going to be put to "good" use?
>
> Vale,
>
> M. Iulius Scaeva
>
> Divide et
impera. Â Ã‚  - Iulius Caesar
>  
>
 
>
>
>
>
>
____________ _________ _________ __
> From: Cato
<catoinnyc@gmail. com>
> To: Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com
>
Sent: Mon, December 14, 2009 10:16:17 AM
> Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Pridie
Eidus Decembres: CONSUALIA
>
>  
> Cato Iulio Scaevae
sal.
>
> So rather than consider the bulk of my speech, you hone in
on the most lamentable part of all - that a praetor would use their "power" to stifle the speech of a citizen based on personality - and celebrate it?
>
> Unfortunate.
>
> Vale,
>
> Cato
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com, John Citron <johnnormancitron@
....> wrote:
> >
> > Di Lauda!
> >
> > I
can hardly wait for the new year to begin.
> >
> > Annus
Paxis!
>

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72576 From: Maxima Valeria Messallina Date: 2009-12-14
Subject: Re: apologies to the forum
The NRWiki list is for wiki stuff, or at least, that is my understanding. I never would have thought to go there for computer questions (so that was news to me).
No, this was a list I seem to remember that was all about computers. I can't find it anymore. Guess it's defunct now. Too bad.
 
MaximaValeria Messallina
 

--- On Mon, 12/14/09, C.Maria Caeca <c.mariacaeca@...> wrote:

From: C.Maria Caeca <c.mariacaeca@...>
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] apologies to the forum
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Date: Monday, December 14, 2009, 4:24 PM

 

Caeca Messalinae omnibusque sal,
 
Um, are you referring to the NR WIKI list?  It was always my impression that that list dealt with WIKI issues, including technical ones like editing, etc.  I never thought it was intended for general questions.  I guess I just didn't think, because I was neck deep in doing my midterm, got myself into a mess, and automatically went running to the community I thought would be the most likely to understand, shrug.
 
Vale et valete bene,
C. Maria Caeca

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72577 From: Cato Date: 2009-12-14
Subject: Re: Pridie Eidus Decembres: CONSUALIA
Cato Iulio Scaevae sal.

So are you saying that suppressing an individual's Constitutionally-guaranteed freedom of speech, based on personality rather than the actual speech, is a "good" thing?

Vale,

Cato



--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, John Citron <johnnormancitron@...> wrote:
>
> Salve Cato,
>
> What's the point of having power if it's not going to be put to "good" use?
>
> Vale,
>
> M. Iulius Scaeva
>
> Divide et impera.    - Iulius Caesar
>  
>  
>
>
>
>
> ________________________________
> From: Cato <catoinnyc@...>
> To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Mon, December 14, 2009 10:16:17 AM
> Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Pridie Eidus Decembres: CONSUALIA
>
>  
> Cato Iulio Scaevae sal.
>
> So rather than consider the bulk of my speech, you hone in on the most lamentable part of all - that a praetor would use their "power" to stifle the speech of a citizen based on personality - and celebrate it?
>
> Unfortunate.
>
> Vale,
>
> Cato
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com, John Citron <johnnormancitron@ ...> wrote:
> >
> > Di Lauda!
> >
> > I can hardly wait for the new year to begin.
> >
> > Annus Paxis!
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72578 From: David Kling Date: 2009-12-14
Subject: Re: Pridie Eidus Decembres: CONSUALIA
Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus Catoni salutem dicit

Will you give it a rest?  He isn't a fan; just accept it and move on!

Vale;

Modianus

On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 8:34 PM, Cato <catoinnyc@...> wrote:
 

Cato Iulio Scaevae sal.

So are you saying that suppressing an individual's Constitutionally-guaranteed freedom of speech, based on personality rather than the actual speech, is a "good" thing?

Vale,

Cato

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72579 From: John Citron Date: 2009-12-14
Subject: Re: Pridie Eidus Decembres: CONSUALIA
Salve Modianus,
 
Well put.
 
Vale,
 
M. Iulius Scaeva
 

 



From: David Kling <tau.athanasios@...>
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Mon, December 14, 2009 8:41:08 PM
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: Pridie Eidus Decembres: CONSUALIA

 

Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus Catoni salutem dicit


Will you give it a rest?  He isn't a fan; just accept it and move on!

Vale;

Modianus

On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 8:34 PM, Cato <catoinnyc@gmail. com> wrote:
 

Cato Iulio Scaevae sal.

So are you saying that suppressing an individual's Constitutionally- guaranteed freedom of speech, based on personality rather than the actual speech, is a "good" thing?

Vale,

Cato

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72580 From: John Citron Date: 2009-12-14
Subject: Re: Pridie Eidus Decembres: CONSUALIA
Salve Regulus,
 
Well it is clear we have different opinions as to the nature of Cato's input into NR.  Let this not be a source of animosity between us.   Let us simply agree to disagree, on this issue.
 
You must agree however that the tide is changing.  One must think carefully and strategically where they place their alliances lest one finds themselves swept out to sea.
 
Ab Iove principium.  -  Aeneas
 
Vale,
 
M. Iulius Scaeva

 



From: T. Annaeus Regulus <t.annaevsregvlvs@...>
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Mon, December 14, 2009 7:32:22 PM
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: Pridie Eidus Decembres: CONSUALIA

 

Salve,
 
It was no endorsement. The fact that I am not willing to make a blanket statement as to the value of someone's contributions does not make me a raving endorser of what he has to say. Simply put, the removal of dissenting voices allows for the creation of potentially unhealthy paradigms within Nova Roma. Without Cato criticizing and putting forward what he thinks, our vision is narrowed. If you allow moderators the power to silence those who you disagree with, then you can easily achieve an aggregate narrowing of vision as all who disagree are silenced. The idea that one person in this group has the ability to judge the value of someone else's contribution is one that I disagree with, plain and simple. Nothing particular about Cato, it is the principle I object to.
 
I firmly believe that it takes two to tango. Although Cato is often the source of 'major prattle,' it typically starts as an earnest suggestion, criticism or question to improve us in my experience. Ignoring Cato is possible; addressing him on the issues is possible; there are many possible responses. Hostility and the descent into 'prattle' is an unfortunate one and by no means something that I would blame solely on Cato. I fully recognize that he posts a lot. If one views him as an adversary then that must be frustrating, it being very difficult to keep up. You suggest ways to remove this adversary so that others won't be prone to 'prattle.' I instead would suggest that citizens here change their point of view. Whether or not Cato's views have merit they should be listened to and rebutted, or at worst dismissed as rubbish. Personal attacks get us nowhere, and it the authors of these that are truly our biggest problem in my opinion. Here I would consider Cato's responding in kind to be a breach of appropriate conduct, to assure you I do not ravingly endorse him. ; )
 
We are a team and all working towards a common goal. Differences in methodology should not affect our mutual commitment to our strategic objectives. I fully expect that our praetors will be cognizant of our personal liberties when performing their duties.
 
Vale,
T. Annaeus Regulus

Sent: Monday, December 14, 2009 6:54 PM
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: Pridie Eidus Decembres: CONSUALIA

 

Salve Regulus,
 
Why do you "say" you wouldn't call yourself a Cato supporter when your entire post was nothing mare a raving endorsement of him? 
 
Quite frankly, I stand by my comments.  Why, because whenever there is a major prattle going on in the ML, one can find Cato at the source.  I've seen it time and time again; ad nauseum.  Quam se ipse amans sine rivali!
 
Those continuing disturbances are not in the least constructive and are far more divisive than any import my commentaries may have had.
 
The coming silence will be golden.
 
Vale,
 
M. Iulius Scaeva
 
 


From: T. Annaeus Regulus <t.annaevsregvlvs@ ymail.com>
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com
Sent: Mon, December 14, 2009 4:43:25 PM
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: Pridie Eidus Decembres: CONSUALIA

 

Salve,
 
While I will wait until Maior has begun her magistracy before passing any judgments I certainly don't think the abuse of executive powers for the sake of 'good' causes is desirable. I find it hard to fathom your reasoning. What exactly attracted you to a recreationist organization of Republican Rome if you are a fan of censorship and autocracy? Debate and conflict are a part of any democratic structure and I for one think that Cato is generally one of the more topic-focused regular posters. He, rightly or wrongly, points out things that he disagrees with, and catalyzes the opinion of others. Even if he serves only as a lightning rod for those who oppose him to make a conscious decision on the 'correct' solution, he provides a valuable service to Nova Roma.
 
In my opinion Cato is often detail-oriented (read: nitpicky) and sensitive to the intentional jabs that are made at him (see your own posts in this thread for example). I wouldn't call myself a supporter of Cato, but do I think there's a constructive purpose to censoring him? Certainly not. Cato ran in an election and lost; clearly the majority of voters did not agree with him. That's democracy. It works. I think that is enough. He is still entitled to his opinions, and to share those opinions.
 
What I personally would like to see is people actually engaging in a logical debate (which I think Cato is attempting to do) without resorting to personal slurs or other logic-impeding devices. Perhaps it is laziness or a lack of time that causes people to attack Cato's person rather than his ideas, as he is a prolific poster, but I believe that it is behavior such as that that is actually creating the atmosphere of animosity that exists in Nova Roma. If I disagree with you, and you disagree with me, and we both disagree with Cato, while accepting that each of us is dedicated to improving Nova Roma as it exists to us, then we would be a much stronger organization. Having a variety of viewpoints is a strength. Bland homogenous thinking adds nothing.
 
Your posts in this thread do nothing to foster that sort of camaraderie. It is divisive, demeaning to Cato, and pointless. How do you justify your own behavior as you criticize Cato for his? I think we should be careful not to take sides based on personalities instead of issues. Whatever else I think about Cato, I think he is dedicated to Nova Roma and her wellbeing. For that reason alone he is entitled to a certain level of respect in my mind.
 
Just my two cents.
 
Optime Vale,
T. Annaeus Regulus

Sent: Monday, December 14, 2009 5:05 PM
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: Pridie Eidus Decembres: CONSUALIA

 

Salve Cato,
 
What's the point of having power if it's not going to be put to "good" use?
 
Vale,
 
M. Iulius Scaeva
 
Divide et impera.    - Iulius Caesar
 

 



From: Cato <catoinnyc@gmail. com>
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com
Sent: Mon, December 14, 2009 10:16:17 AM
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Pridie Eidus Decembres: CONSUALIA

 

Cato Iulio Scaevae sal.

So rather than consider the bulk of my speech, you hone in on the most lamentable part of all - that a praetor would use their "power" to stifle the speech of a citizen based on personality - and celebrate it?

Unfortunate.

Vale,

Cato

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com, John Citron <johnnormancitron@ ...> wrote:
>
> Di Lauda!
>
> I can hardly wait for the new year to begin.
>
> Annus Paxis!

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72581 From: T. Annaeus Regulus Date: 2009-12-14
Subject: Re: Pridie Eidus Decembres: CONSUALIA
Salve,
 
Certainly we can disagree without being bad friends. Remaining focused on issues is a great way to have debates without getting personal.
 
As for the tides changing, I am here for the goals that Nova Roma espouses. If my not taking sides means I am swept out to sea then I had better get my snorkel. Personal friendships are great, and I would like to think that I have made some here, but if that means not being focused on constructively improving ourselves then I am content to be a maverick. I find much of the politicking that goes on in our relatively small group to be more appropriate for the trans-Mediterranean Republic we emulate rather than our small, dispersed cyber-tribe. I can't help but feel that there is an element of role-playing or living vicariously through our personas involved at times. I think NR has a lot to offer to its citizens and to the general public in terms of education, religion, and a lesson in diversity and that this fighting is just a pointless distraction. It can be frustrating, as I'm sure we can all attest to.
 
Fortunately, I trust that you, and I, and all of us in Nova Roma really do share a common goal, and that will keep us together until the troubles subside. Hopefully everyone will learn to tolerate each other someday, or at the very least NR will grow so large as to allow people to avoid each other. ; )
 
Caret initio et fine.
 
Optime Vale,
T. Annaeus Regulus

Sent: Monday, December 14, 2009 10:24 PM
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: Pridie Eidus Decembres: CONSUALIA

 

Salve Regulus,
 
Well it is clear we have different opinions as to the nature of Cato's input into NR.  Let this not be a source of animosity between us.   Let us simply agree to disagree, on this issue.
 
You must agree however that the tide is changing.  One must think carefully and strategically where they place their alliances lest one finds themselves swept out to sea.
 
Ab Iove principium.  -  Aeneas
 
Vale,
 
M. Iulius Scaeva

 



From: T. Annaeus Regulus <t.annaevsregvlvs@ ymail.com>
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com
Sent: Mon, December 14, 2009 7:32:22 PM
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: Pridie Eidus Decembres: CONSUALIA

 

Salve,
 
It was no endorsement. The fact that I am not willing to make a blanket statement as to the value of someone's contributions does not make me a raving endorser of what he has to say. Simply put, the removal of dissenting voices allows for the creation of potentially unhealthy paradigms within Nova Roma. Without Cato criticizing and putting forward what he thinks, our vision is narrowed. If you allow moderators the power to silence those who you disagree with, then you can easily achieve an aggregate narrowing of vision as all who disagree are silenced. The idea that one person in this group has the ability to judge the value of someone else's contribution is one that I disagree with, plain and simple. Nothing particular about Cato, it is the principle I object to.
 
I firmly believe that it takes two to tango. Although Cato is often the source of 'major prattle,' it typically starts as an earnest suggestion, criticism or question to improve us in my experience. Ignoring Cato is possible; addressing him on the issues is possible; there are many possible responses. Hostility and the descent into 'prattle' is an unfortunate one and by no means something that I would blame solely on Cato. I fully recognize that he posts a lot. If one views him as an adversary then that must be frustrating, it being very difficult to keep up. You suggest ways to remove this adversary so that others won't be prone to 'prattle.' I instead would suggest that citizens here change their point of view. Whether or not Cato's views have merit they should be listened to and rebutted, or at worst dismissed as rubbish. Personal attacks get us nowhere, and it the authors of these that are truly our biggest problem in my opinion. Here I would consider Cato's responding in kind to be a breach of appropriate conduct, to assure you I do not ravingly endorse him. ; )
 
We are a team and all working towards a common goal. Differences in methodology should not affect our mutual commitment to our strategic objectives. I fully expect that our praetors will be cognizant of our personal liberties when performing their duties.
 
Vale,
T. Annaeus Regulus

Sent: Monday, December 14, 2009 6:54 PM
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: Pridie Eidus Decembres: CONSUALIA

 

Salve Regulus,
 
Why do you "say" you wouldn't call yourself a Cato supporter when your entire post was nothing mare a raving endorsement of him? 
 
Quite frankly, I stand by my comments.  Why, because whenever there is a major prattle going on in the ML, one can find Cato at the source.  I've seen it time and time again; ad nauseum.  Quam se ipse amans sine rivali!
 
Those continuing disturbances are not in the least constructive and are far more divisive than any import my commentaries may have had.
 
The coming silence will be golden.
 
Vale,
 
M. Iulius Scaeva
 
 


From: T. Annaeus Regulus <t.annaevsregvlvs@ ymail.com>
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com
Sent: Mon, December 14, 2009 4:43:25 PM
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: Pridie Eidus Decembres: CONSUALIA

 

Salve,
 
While I will wait until Maior has begun her magistracy before passing any judgments I certainly don't think the abuse of executive powers for the sake of 'good' causes is desirable. I find it hard to fathom your reasoning. What exactly attracted you to a recreationist organization of Republican Rome if you are a fan of censorship and autocracy? Debate and conflict are a part of any democratic structure and I for one think that Cato is generally one of the more topic-focused regular posters. He, rightly or wrongly, points out things that he disagrees with, and catalyzes the opinion of others. Even if he serves only as a lightning rod for those who oppose him to make a conscious decision on the 'correct' solution, he provides a valuable service to Nova Roma.
 
In my opinion Cato is often detail-oriented (read: nitpicky) and sensitive to the intentional jabs that are made at him (see your own posts in this thread for example). I wouldn't call myself a supporter of Cato, but do I think there's a constructive purpose to censoring him? Certainly not. Cato ran in an election and lost; clearly the majority of voters did not agree with him. That's democracy. It works. I think that is enough. He is still entitled to his opinions, and to share those opinions.
 
What I personally would like to see is people actually engaging in a logical debate (which I think Cato is attempting to do) without resorting to personal slurs or other logic-impeding devices. Perhaps it is laziness or a lack of time that causes people to attack Cato's person rather than his ideas, as he is a prolific poster, but I believe that it is behavior such as that that is actually creating the atmosphere of animosity that exists in Nova Roma. If I disagree with you, and you disagree with me, and we both disagree with Cato, while accepting that each of us is dedicated to improving Nova Roma as it exists to us, then we would be a much stronger organization. Having a variety of viewpoints is a strength. Bland homogenous thinking adds nothing.
 
Your posts in this thread do nothing to foster that sort of camaraderie. It is divisive, demeaning to Cato, and pointless. How do you justify your own behavior as you criticize Cato for his? I think we should be careful not to take sides based on personalities instead of issues. Whatever else I think about Cato, I think he is dedicated to Nova Roma and her wellbeing. For that reason alone he is entitled to a certain level of respect in my mind.
 
Just my two cents.
 
Optime Vale,
T. Annaeus Regulus

Sent: Monday, December 14, 2009 5:05 PM
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: Pridie Eidus Decembres: CONSUALIA

 

Salve Cato,
 
What's the point of having power if it's not going to be put to "good" use?
 
Vale,
 
M. Iulius Scaeva
 
Divide et impera.    - Iulius Caesar
 

 



From: Cato <catoinnyc@gmail. com>
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com
Sent: Mon, December 14, 2009 10:16:17 AM
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Pridie Eidus Decembres: CONSUALIA

 

Cato Iulio Scaevae sal.

So rather than consider the bulk of my speech, you hone in on the most lamentable part of all - that a praetor would use their "power" to stifle the speech of a citizen based on personality - and celebrate it?

Unfortunate.

Vale,

Cato

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com, John Citron <johnnormancitron@ ...> wrote:

>
> Di
Lauda!
>
> I can hardly wait for the new year to begin.
>
> Annus Paxis!

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72582 From: Marcus Iulius Scaeva Date: 2009-12-14
Subject: Re: Pridie Eidus Decembres: CONSUALIA
Salve Regulus,
 
Well my friend, at least we can agree upon that.
 
I too feel that we all here do share a common goal; we just have different ideas and methods of working towards them.
 
I admire your zeal towards idealism.  I once viewed the world that way when I was a young man.
 
However, I am a pragmatist.  I live and function in the world of practicality and compromise.  Only in such an environment do worthwhile goals actually become accomplished.
 

Idealism is a guide, a goal, an extreme point of view.   It can not be a standard of functionality for there are too many divergent points of view for an idealistic notion to satisfy all wants and desires.
 
Real life is a compromise.  It's how we all ultimately survive.
 
Dum spiro, spero.
 
Vale,
 
M. Iulius Scaeva



From: T. Annaeus Regulus <t.annaevsregvlvs@...>
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Mon, December 14, 2009 10:55:17 PM
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: Pridie Eidus Decembres: CONSUALIA

 

Salve,
 
Certainly we can disagree without being bad friends. Remaining focused on issues is a great way to have debates without getting personal.
 
As for the tides changing, I am here for the goals that Nova Roma espouses. If my not taking sides means I am swept out to sea then I had better get my snorkel. Personal friendships are great, and I would like to think that I have made some here, but if that means not being focused on constructively improving ourselves then I am content to be a maverick. I find much of the politicking that goes on in our relatively small group to be more appropriate for the trans-Mediterranean Republic we emulate rather than our small, dispersed cyber-tribe. I can't help but feel that there is an element of role-playing or living vicariously through our personas involved at times. I think NR has a lot to offer to its citizens and to the general public in terms of education, religion, and a lesson in diversity and that this fighting is just a pointless distraction. It can be frustrating, as I'm sure we can all attest to.
 
Fortunately, I trust that you, and I, and all of us in Nova Roma really do share a common goal, and that will keep us together until the troubles subside. Hopefully everyone will learn to tolerate each other someday, or at the very least NR will grow so large as to allow people to avoid each other. ; )
 
Caret initio et fine.
 
Optime Vale,
T. Annaeus Regulus

Sent: Monday, December 14, 2009 10:24 PM
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: Pridie Eidus Decembres: CONSUALIA

 

Salve Regulus,
 
Well it is clear we have different opinions as to the nature of Cato's input into NR.  Let this not be a source of animosity between us.   Let us simply agree to disagree, on this issue.
 
You must agree however that the tide is changing.  One must think carefully and strategically where they place their alliances lest one finds themselves swept out to sea.
 
Ab Iove principium.  -  Aeneas
 
Vale,
 
M. Iulius Scaeva

 



From: T. Annaeus Regulus <t.annaevsregvlvs@ ymail.com>
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com
Sent: Mon, December 14, 2009 7:32:22 PM
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: Pridie Eidus Decembres: CONSUALIA

 

Salve,
 
It was no endorsement. The fact that I am not willing to make a blanket statement as to the value of someone's contributions does not make me a raving endorser of what he has to say. Simply put, the removal of dissenting voices allows for the creation of potentially unhealthy paradigms within Nova Roma. Without Cato criticizing and putting forward what he thinks, our vision is narrowed. If you allow moderators the power to silence those who you disagree with, then you can easily achieve an aggregate narrowing of vision as all who disagree are silenced. The idea that one person in this group has the ability to judge the value of someone else's contribution is one that I disagree with, plain and simple. Nothing particular about Cato, it is the principle I object to.
 
I firmly believe that it takes two to tango. Although Cato is often the source of 'major prattle,' it typically starts as an earnest suggestion, criticism or question to improve us in my experience. Ignoring Cato is possible; addressing him on the issues is possible; there are many possible responses. Hostility and the descent into 'prattle' is an unfortunate one and by no means something that I would blame solely on Cato. I fully recognize that he posts a lot. If one views him as an adversary then that must be frustrating, it being very difficult to keep up. You suggest ways to remove this adversary so that others won't be prone to 'prattle.' I instead would suggest that citizens here change their point of view. Whether or not Cato's views have merit they should be listened to and rebutted, or at worst dismissed as rubbish. Personal attacks get us nowhere, and it the authors of these that are truly our biggest problem in my opinion. Here I would consider Cato's responding in kind to be a breach of appropriate conduct, to assure you I do not ravingly endorse him. ; )
 
We are a team and all working towards a common goal. Differences in methodology should not affect our mutual commitment to our strategic objectives. I fully expect that our praetors will be cognizant of our personal liberties when performing their duties.
 
Vale,
T. Annaeus Regulus

Sent: Monday, December 14, 2009 6:54 PM
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: Pridie Eidus Decembres: CONSUALIA

 

Salve Regulus,
 
Why do you "say" you wouldn't call yourself a Cato supporter when your entire post was nothing mare a raving endorsement of him? 
 
Quite frankly, I stand by my comments.  Why, because whenever there is a major prattle going on in the ML, one can find Cato at the source.  I've seen it time and time again; ad nauseum.  Quam se ipse amans sine rivali!
 
Those continuing disturbances are not in the least constructive and are far more divisive than any import my commentaries may have had.
 
The coming silence will be golden.
 
Vale,
 
M. Iulius Scaeva
 
 


From: T. Annaeus Regulus <t.annaevsregvlvs@ ymail.com>
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com
Sent: Mon, December 14, 2009 4:43:25 PM
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: Pridie Eidus Decembres: CONSUALIA

 

Salve,
 
While I will wait until Maior has begun her magistracy before passing any judgments I certainly don't think the abuse of executive powers for the sake of 'good' causes is desirable. I find it hard to fathom your reasoning. What exactly attracted you to a recreationist organization of Republican Rome if you are a fan of censorship and autocracy? Debate and conflict are a part of any democratic structure and I for one think that Cato is generally one of the more topic-focused regular posters. He, rightly or wrongly, points out things that he disagrees with, and catalyzes the opinion of others. Even if he serves only as a lightning rod for those who oppose him to make a conscious decision on the 'correct' solution, he provides a valuable service to Nova Roma.
 
In my opinion Cato is often detail-oriented (read: nitpicky) and sensitive to the intentional jabs that are made at him (see your own posts in this thread for example). I wouldn't call myself a supporter of Cato, but do I think there's a constructive purpose to censoring him? Certainly not. Cato ran in an election and lost; clearly the majority of voters did not agree with him. That's democracy. It works. I think that is enough. He is still entitled to his opinions, and to share those opinions.
 
What I personally would like to see is people actually engaging in a logical debate (which I think Cato is attempting to do) without resorting to personal slurs or other logic-impeding devices. Perhaps it is laziness or a lack of time that causes people to attack Cato's person rather than his ideas, as he is a prolific poster, but I believe that it is behavior such as that that is actually creating the atmosphere of animosity that exists in Nova Roma. If I disagree with you, and you disagree with me, and we both disagree with Cato, while accepting that each of us is dedicated to improving Nova Roma as it exists to us, then we would be a much stronger organization. Having a variety of viewpoints is a strength. Bland homogenous thinking adds nothing.
 
Your posts in this thread do nothing to foster that sort of camaraderie. It is divisive, demeaning to Cato, and pointless. How do you justify your own behavior as you criticize Cato for his? I think we should be careful not to take sides based on personalities instead of issues. Whatever else I think about Cato, I think he is dedicated to Nova Roma and her wellbeing. For that reason alone he is entitled to a certain level of respect in my mind.
 
Just my two cents.
 
Optime Vale,
T. Annaeus Regulus

Sent: Monday, December 14, 2009 5:05 PM
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: Pridie Eidus Decembres: CONSUALIA

 

Salve Cato,
 
What's the point of having power if it's not going to be put to "good" use?
 
Vale,
 
M. Iulius Scaeva
 
Divide et impera.    - Iulius Caesar
 

 



From: Cato <catoinnyc@gmail. com>
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com
Sent: Mon, December 14, 2009 10:16:17 AM
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Pridie Eidus Decembres: CONSUALIA

 

Cato Iulio Scaevae sal.

So rather than consider the bulk of my speech, you hone in on the most lamentable part of all - that a praetor would use their "power" to stifle the speech of a citizen based on personality - and celebrate it?

Unfortunate.

Vale,

Cato

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com, John Citron <johnnormancitron@ ...> wrote:
>
> Di Lauda!
>
> I can hardly wait for the new year to begin.
>
> Annus Paxis!

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72583 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2009-12-15
Subject: Re: new project
Re: [Nova-Roma] new project

 
A. Tullia Scholastica Maximae Valeriae Messallinae optimae suae quiritibus, sociis, peregrinisque bonae voluntatis S.P.D.

   

So, Scholastica, are you then suggesting these reasons for the list?

2. For many, Latin is the only common language among people who do not know one another’s vernacular languages.
3. [It] has the merit of being no one’s native tongue, so there can be no resentment that some major vernacular language, such as English, is being imposed on everyone.

Those sound like good reasons to me. :)

    ATS:  Yes, they certainly do.  I’m glad you agree.  Later on in the Sermó courses, students are allowed to watch a video of people from all over the world speaking in Latin...and even arguing a bit about the dominance of English.  
Here is my addition:

4. You learn which words that you use in your own native tongue came from Latin.

    ATS:  Indeed one does.  Approximately 60% of English vocabulary is derived from Latin (and a lot more of French, Spanish, Portuguese, Italian, Romanian...heck, I can even figure out some of what Sabinus is saying in Romanian).  

Btw, great idea, Caeca!

    ATS:  Indeed it is.  

Valete bene,

Maxima Valeria Messallina

Valete bene!


--- On Mon, 12/14/09, A. Tullia Scholastica <fororom@...> wrote:

From: A. Tullia Scholastica <fororom@...>
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] new project
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Date: Monday, December 14, 2009, 1:24 AM

  

 A. Tullia Scholastica C. Mariae Caecae quiritibus, sociis, peregrinisque bonae voluntatis S.P.D.
 
   

Salvete Omnes,

Now that I have turned in the first part of my midterm, and have a little
time before I begin studying for the rest, I have a new project in mind, and
no, this is not OT.  I want to make a list which, I hope, will eventually
make it's way to our WIKI.  What I have in mind is one of those 25 reasons
to lists that have been so popular, but, of course, we can have any number
we want, or can get.  So, post your reason(s), and I'll keep track of them,
create our list, and when it's respectable, find out what to *do* with it.

Oh!  Did I not mention the topic?  How very remiss of me! (wink).

here it is, then, and I'll start with one entry, although I can think of
several, and will add them in, if no one else does.

25 excellent reasons to learn Latin
  1. It is a beautiful and eloquent language.

        ATS:  That it is.  2.  There are many people in the world, and some right here in Nova Roma, who actually speak Latin, and others who are very fluent writers of Latin.  For many, Latin is the only common language among people who do not know one another’s vernacular languages, and has the merit of being no one’s native tongue, so there can be no resentment that some major vernacular language, such as English, is being imposed on everyone.  

    Naming names:  Among the Latin speakers in NR are A. Gratius Avitus, Cn. Cornelius Lentulus, A. Apollonius Cordus, Cn. Salvius Astur (consularis) , yours truly, possibly L. Livia Plauta, and there are others as well.  Highly competent writers include most of the above, plus C. Tullius Valerianus, Sex. Pontius Pilatus Barbatus, and apparently M. Cornelius Gualterus Graecus.   No doubt there are others, as well as those who can write Latin, if less fluently, and still more who can read it.  At least two or three Tullii are competent Latinists...

    Those who want to communicate world wide might try learning Latin; in my classes I have Russians, Spaniards, Americans, Japanese, a South African, an Austrian, a Frenchman, Britons, and many others; in the past we have had Scandinavians, Israelis, and assorted South Americans, whereas we have only one of the latter this year.  The mixture varies, but is always interesting. ..and Skype or Google talk or whatever will allow you to chat with your new friends in Latin.   

Your turn!
    
Hope this helps.  

Valete optime,
C. Maria Caeca

 Valete optime!
   


 
 
   

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72584 From: marcushoratius Date: 2009-12-15
Subject: a. d. XIIX Kalendas Ianuarias: Fortuna Reddux
M. Moravius Piscinus Quiritibus, cultoribus Deorum et omnibus salutem plurimam dicit: Curate ut valeatis, et Di vos servent.

Hodie est ante diem XIIX Kalendas Ianuarias; haec dies nefastus est: ara Fortunae Reduci dedicata

A Consualia is mentioned for 15 December at Praeneste and elsewhere, including on the fasti of Amiternum that mentions the festival held on the Aventine for Consus that was celebrated on the Ides at Rome. The nature of this other Consualia is presumed to have been the same, celebrated with horse races, mule races, and chariot races.


AUC 734 / 19 BCE: Dedication of the Temple of Fortuna Redux

The Senate dedicated an Altar of Fortuna Redux upon the fortunate return of Augustus to Rome. The Altar was by the Porta Capena, near the sacred grove of Carmentis. Sacerdotes Augustales were joined by Vestales Virgines to celebrate the Augustalia, paying tribute to the Genius of Caesar Augustus. There were several forms of Fortuna recognized. There was even a temple for Bad Fortuna to placate Her and keep Her from Rome. Some Fortunae were associated with the earlier kings of Rome, some for children, for women, and so on. Fortuna multiplied, as each city had their own Fortuna, or Tyche, or Tutela, until She seemed to dominate the Empire.

"For all over the world, in all places, and at all times, Fortuna is the only Goddess whom every one invokes; She alone is spoken of, She alone is accused and is supposed to be guilty; She alone is in our thoughts, is praised and blamed, and is loathed with reproaches; wavering as She is, conceived by the generality of mankind to be blind, wandering, inconstant, uncertain, variable, and often favouring the unworthy. To Her are referred all our losses and all our gains, and in casting up the accounts of mortals She alone balances the two pages of our sheet. We are so much in the power of chance that change itself is considered as a God, and the existence of God becomes doubtful." ~ C. Plinius Secundus, Historia Naturalis 2.5

Fortuna Redux was initially associated with Augustus Caesar, and later with other emperors as they traveled; Fortuna Redux was called upon to see to his safe return. Dedications to Her are also found along the imperial boundaries where she was particularly adopted by the legions, but also by groups of merchants.Local deities were sometimes adopted in Her place. The most important of these was perhaps Nehalennia in Germania Inferior as She protected travelers from the mouth of the Rhine across the North Sea. Other forms of Fortuna developed during the imperial era as the fortunes of the empire were tied into the emperor. For example we find on the coins of Caligula his three sisters, Julia, Drusilla, and Agrippina depicted with cornucopia as though they were triple goddesses of Fortuna similar to the Germanic Vacallinehis. Fortuna Reddux, Bonus Eventus, Eventus Melior, Fortuna Domestica, Fortuna Conservatrix, are all forms of Fortuna found in the provinces. No where else is Fortuna Reddux so frequently found than on inscriptions from Dacia for the safe return of Emperor Traianus and his legions.


AUC 540 / 213 BCE: Fire at Rome and the marvel in the Temple of Fortuna

"At Rome there was a dreadful fire that lasted for two nights and a day. All the buildings between the Salinae and the Porta Carmentalis, including the Aequimaelium, the Vicus Jugarius, and the temples of Fortune and Mater Matuta were burnt to the ground. The fire traveled for a considerable distance outside the gate and destroyed much property and many sacred objects." ~ Titus Livius 24.47.15

"When the shrine of the Salii was burned, nothing was found in it intact except for the augural lituus of Romulus. The Statue of Servius Tullius remained undamaged when the Temple of Fortuna was destroyed by fire." ~ Valerius Maximus 1.8.11 (see also Cicero, Div. 1.30; Dionysius Halicarnassus 4.40.7)

There was a statue enthroned, an image of Servius:
They say it put a hand to its eyes,
And a voice was heard: 'Hide my face,
Lest it view my own wicked daughter.'
It was veiled by cloth, Fortune refused to let the robe
Be removed, and She Herself spoke from her temple:
'The day when the face of Servius is next revealed,
Will be a day when modesty is cast aside''
. . .
The temple once burned: but the fire spared
The statue: Volcanus Mulciber preserved His son.
~ Ovid, Fast 6.12-26


AUC 790 / 37 CE: Birth of Nero

Nero was born at Antium nine months after the death of Tiberius, on the eighteenth day before the Kalends of January, just as the sun rose, so that he was touched by its rays almost before he could be laid upon the ground. Many people at once made many direful predictions from his horoscope, and a remark of his father Domitius was also regarded as an omen; for while receiving the congratulations of his friends, he said that "nothing that was not abominable and a public bane could be born of Agrippina and himself." ~ A. Suetonius Tranquillus, Life of Nero 6.1


AUC 883 / 130 CE: Birth of Lucius Verus

Lucius Ceionius Aelius Commodus Verus Antoninus, "in character he was utterly ingenuous and unable to conceal a thing." His father, Lucius Aelius Verus, was adopted by Hadrian and raised to the rank of Caesar, but had died before becoming an Augustus. Young Verus remained a private citizen but in the imperial household. Hadrian had Marcus Aurelius adopt Verus, and an arrangement provided that Verus should marry the daughter of Antonius Pius. However it was Marcus Aurelius who married Faustina, and Verus, being a much younger man, was instead married to Lucilla, Marcus Aurelius' daughter. Eventually Marcus Aurelius raised Verus to co-emperor. Everything that Marcus Aurelius was, Verus was the opposite. He was fond of chariot races, preferring the Greens too publicly, and gladiatorial contests, gambling with dice, brawling in taverns, chasing young boys, other men's wives, hunting, and gluttony, all to the neglect of his duties. Marcus Aurelius sent him to Syria for the Parthian War, either to reform him or at least to get him away from Rome. His failures there brought Lucilla and Marcus Aurelius to Syria to repair the damage. A pestilence that first began at Babylon was carried back through the provinces by Verus and his army, eventually to Rome itself. When war later broke out in Germania, and then in Panonnia, Marcus Aurelius brought both Verus and Lucilla along with him. On the return from these wars Verus became seriously ill, bleeding, and died. Rumors alternated between his having been poisoned by his mother-in-law Faustina, or by his wife Lucilla. More likely his gluttony finally got the best of him, much to the benefit of the Empire.


Today's thought is from Seneca, Epistles 102

"As the mother's womb holds us for ten months, making us ready, not for the womb itself, but for the existence into which we seem to be sent forth when at last we are fitted to draw breath and live in the open; just so, throughout the years extending between infancy and old age, we are making ourselves ready for another birth. A different beginning, a different condition, awaits us. We cannot yet, except at rare intervals, endure the light of heaven; therefore, look forward without fear to that appointed hour - the last hour of the body but not of the soul."
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72585 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2009-12-15
Subject: Re: new project
Re: [Nova-Roma] new project

 
A. Tullia Scholastica C. Mariae Caecae quiritibus, sociis, peregrinisque bonae voluntatis S.P.D.

   

Caeca Scholasticae omnibusque sal,

Indeed it does help, and thank you!  

    ATS:  Glad to be of assistance.  Not everyone knows that people REALLY DO speak Latin these days.  

This will go into my folder, and on to my list, although for what I've got in mind, I'll shorten it just a bit although ...hmmm ...on second thought ...no, I won't! (grin).  

    ATS:  Well, not all is immediately relevant, but I think it helps to know that several of us here are among the Latin speakers.  Astur, Cordus, and I were among the five survivors of the very first Assimil course, which is now called Sermo Latinus I & II.  

And now, Magistra mea, a question:  I'm *sure* Roman children played tag in some form ...it's a universal game, after all ...so how would one say "You're it!"  

    ATS:  Well, I can translate this, but whether or not Roman children used a different phrase is another matter.  Maybe they said you’re the donkey.  Or something else...but you are it is es id.  This, however, just does NOT sound right to me.  Grammatically it works, but I doubt that that is what was said by our little togati.  

Gratias tibi ago!  Next?

    ATS:  Maxima gave you another good reason...Next?  

Vale et Valete optime,
C. Maria Caeca

   Vale et valete quam optime.  

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72586 From: Charlie Collins Date: 2009-12-15
Subject: Re: apoloties to the forum
Salve,

There is a NR Computer list. I did a search in Yahoogroups and found it. It's not active (at least for NR it's not). Theres nothing but SPAM there now. It has not been maintained at all.



Vale,
Quintus Servilius Priscus


On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 6:08 PM, Maxima Valeria Messallina <maximavaleriamessallina@...> wrote:


Hey, we all need help now and then with the techno stuff. Don't aplogize or we'll all have to. LOL
Didn't there use to be, or maybe still is, a Nova Roma Computer list? I seem to remember that. Anybody know?
 
Maxima Valeria Messallina


--- On Mon, 12/7/09, C.Maria Caeca <c.mariacaeca@...> wrote:

From: C.Maria Caeca <c.mariacaeca@...>
Subject: [Nova-Roma] apoloties to the forumDate: Monday, December 7, 2009, 10:26 PM


 
Salvete omnes,

My apologies to the list. I have found help resolving my issues, and will,
of course, not trouble this forum with such inappropriate trivia again.

Respectfully,
C. Maria Caeca





Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72587 From: Cato Date: 2009-12-15
Subject: Re: Pridie Eidus Decembres: CONSUALIA
Cato omnibus in foro SPD

I love the not-so-subtle hints that are being tossed out - better watch out or you won't be here much longer, better choose the "right" side in the coming "tide", etc. These coupled with an arrogance that accepts the action of - even encourages - a magistrate to violate the guarantees offered to our citizens by the Constitution create an appalling vision of the future of our Respublica.

Modianus, I don't care who is a fan or not, unlike some others here. What I *do* care about is the willingness, the eagerness, of some to simply run rampant over the Constitution and our law based on personal likes and dislikes, rather than an impartial respect for the law.

Iulius Scaeva, you proudly announce your desire to see a fellow citizen silenced not because of the content of their speech but rather how you *feel* about them. Remember that you "friends" will not always be in "power", so whatever you allow them now you are tacitly allowing all future magistrates - even ones who may find you and your opinions distasteful. That is a short, slippery road into tyranny and abuse - and someday you may be on the receiving end.

Think carefully before hopping onto that wagon and eagerly waving the flag of censorship.

Valete,

Cato
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72588 From: Maxima Valeria Messallina Date: 2009-12-15
Subject: Re: apoloties to the forum
Yep, that is the one. Thank you. Ashame it's not active anymore.


--- On Tue, 12/15/09, Charlie Collins <oldroman@...> wrote:

From: Charlie Collins <oldroman@...>
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] apoloties to the forum
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Date: Tuesday, December 15, 2009, 1:43 AM

 
Salve,

There is a NR Computer list. I did a search in Yahoogroups and found it. It's not active (at least for NR it's not). Theres nothing but SPAM there now. It has not been maintained at all.



Vale,
Quintus Servilius Priscus


On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 6:08 PM, Maxima Valeria Messallina <maximavaleriamessal lina@yahoo. com> wrote:


Hey, we all need help now and then with the techno stuff. Don't aplogize or we'll all have to. LOL
Didn't there use to be, or maybe still is, a Nova Roma Computer list? I seem to remember that. Anybody know?
 
Maxima Valeria Messallina


--- On Mon, 12/7/09, C.Maria Caeca <c.mariacaeca@ gmail.com> wrote:

From: C.Maria Caeca <c.mariacaeca@ gmail.com>
Subject: [Nova-Roma] apoloties to the forum Date: Monday, December 7, 2009, 10:26 PM


 
Salvete omnes,

My apologies to the list. I have found help resolving my issues, and will,
of course, not trouble this forum with such inappropriate trivia again.

Respectfully,
C. Maria Caeca






Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72589 From: Ass.Pomerium Date: 2009-12-15
Subject: Mercoledi 23 dicembre: la mostra alle Scuderie del Quirinale "La pit
Attachments :

     

     

    Associazione Pomerium

    L'Associazione culturale Pomerium  è lieta di invitarvi  mercoledì 23 dicembre per una visita insieme alla mostra alle Scuderie del Quirinale “La pittura di un impero”.

     

    La mostra vuole illustrare come, a partire dall’arte pittorica romana, vengano stabiliti i canoni della Pittura Occidentale, dal Rinascimento fino all’Ottocento, e dunque stabiliti contestualmente i canoni di genere (la ritrattistica, le nature morte, il paesaggio, la mitologia, la vita quotidiana, le scene erotiche) secondo un’iconografia che è rimasta virtualmente immutata per quasi duemila anni. In mostra una selezione di opere di vario genere del Periodo Imperiale in modo da illustrare il loro impatto sull’arte occidentale: affreschi, mosaici, miniature su vetro, ritratti in encausto su legno e disegni su marmo. 

    (altre informazioni su http://www.romeguide.it/mostre/pitturaromana/pitturaromana.html)

     

    L'appuntamento è per le ore  17.45  di fronte all'ingresso delle Scuderie del Quirinale, in Via XXIV Maggio 16 ( per info dell'ultimo minuto chiamate al cell. 333. 8527265). Ingresso 10,00 €.

     

    A seguire ci intratterremo insieme al ristorante “Il Pomodorino”, in Via Campania 45 (zona Corso Italia),per farci gli auguri di buone feste.

     

    Vi aspettiamo!

     

    Info:www.pomerium.org 
    e-mail:  info@pomerium.org 

     


     

    Per info rmazioni:
    Associazione Pomerium - www.pomerium.org
    c/o Marocco F. - Viale Alessandrino 477 - 00172 Roma

    info@pomerium.org - amministrazione@pomerium.orgsegreteria@pomerium.org

     

    Vive ergo moribus praeteritis, loquere verbis praesentibus (Vivi perciò con la moralità degli antichi, ma usa le parole della modernità; A.Gellio - Notti Attiche)

    Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72590 From: M•IVL• SEVERVS Date: 2009-12-15
    Subject: A PUBLIC CALL TO THE FORMER TRIBUNES OF THE PLEBS
    Salvete,
     
    I hereby call the former Tribunes of the Plebs, C. Vipsanius Agrippa, Ti. Horatius Barbatus, C. Pompeius Marcellus, and Ap. Galerius Aurelianus, to fulfill their duties to the People and the Res publica, by issuing an official report on the last Senate session, which was held during their term of office.
    Their oath forces them to fulfill their duties until the last second of their term, and they should have done it before December 10. Since this report is still needed, they must comply.
    The People and the Res publica must hear from them real soon.
     
    Valete,
     
    M•IVL•SEVERVS
    CONSVL•NOVÆ•ROMÆ

    SENATOR
    CONSVL•PROVINCIÆ•MEXICI
    Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72591 From: Titus Flavius Aquila Date: 2009-12-15
    Subject: AW: [Nova-Roma] A PUBLIC CALL TO THE FORMER TRIBUNES OF THE PLEBS
    Salvete,
     
    I support the public call of our Consul Severus.
     
    Former Tribunes, you are representing the eyes of the Plebeians in the Senate sessions, I call as well on you to provide the missing report of the last Senate session. Please fulfill your duties as you have sworn . Please do not end your term with this missing part of your duty.
     
    Valete bene
    Titus Flavius Aquila
    Quaestor
    Curule Aedile designatus


    Von: M•IVL• SEVERVS <m.iul.severus.consul@...>
    An: Nova Roma <nova-roma@yahoogroups.com>
    CC: Senatus Romanus <SenatusRomanus@yahoogroups.com>
    Gesendet: Dienstag, den 15. Dezember 2009, 21:15:09 Uhr
    Betreff: [Nova-Roma] A PUBLIC CALL TO THE FORMER TRIBUNES OF THE PLEBS

     

    Salvete,
     
    I hereby call the former Tribunes of the Plebs, C. Vipsanius Agrippa, Ti. Horatius Barbatus, C. Pompeius Marcellus, and Ap. Galerius Aurelianus, to fulfill their duties to the People and the Res publica, by issuing an official report on the last Senate session, which was held during their term of office.
    Their oath forces them to fulfill their duties until the last second of their term, and they should have done it before December 10. Since this report is still needed, they must comply.
    The People and the Res publica must hear from them real soon.
     
    Valete,
     
    M•IVL•SEVERVS
    CONSVL•NOVÆ•ROMÆ

    SENATOR
    CONSVL•PROVINCIÆ•MEXICI

    __________________________________________________
    Do You Yahoo!?
    Sie sind Spam leid? Yahoo! Mail verfügt über einen herausragenden Schutz gegen Massenmails.
    http://mail.yahoo.com
    Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72592 From: T. Annaeus Regulus Date: 2009-12-15
    Subject: Re: Pridie Eidus Decembres: CONSUALIA
    Salve,
     
    Hopeful pragmatism and mutual respect. I think that is an appropriate compromise to end our debate.
     
    Salus populi suprema lex esto.
     
    Pax,
    T. Annaeus Regulus

    Sent: Tuesday, December 15, 2009 1:11 AM
    Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: Pridie Eidus Decembres: CONSUALIA

     

    Salve Regulus,
     
    Well my friend, at least we can agree upon that.
     
    I too feel that we all here do share a common goal; we just have different ideas and methods of working towards them.
     
    I admire your zeal towards idealism.  I once viewed the world that way when I was a young man.
     
    However, I am a pragmatist.  I live and function in the world of practicality and compromise.  Only in such an environment do worthwhile goals actually become accomplished.
     

    Idealism is a guide, a goal, an extreme point of view.   It can not be a standard of functionality for there are too many divergent points of view for an idealistic notion to satisfy all wants and desires.
     
    Real life is a compromise.  It's how we all ultimately survive.
     
    Dum spiro, spero.
     
    Vale,
     
    M. Iulius Scaeva



    From: T. Annaeus Regulus <t.annaevsregvlvs@ ymail.com>
    To: Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com
    Sent: Mon, December 14, 2009 10:55:17 PM
    Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: Pridie Eidus Decembres: CONSUALIA

     

    Salve,
     
    Certainly we can disagree without being bad friends. Remaining focused on issues is a great way to have debates without getting personal.
     
    As for the tides changing, I am here for the goals that Nova Roma espouses. If my not taking sides means I am swept out to sea then I had better get my snorkel. Personal friendships are great, and I would like to think that I have made some here, but if that means not being focused on constructively improving ourselves then I am content to be a maverick. I find much of the politicking that goes on in our relatively small group to be more appropriate for the trans-Mediterranean Republic we emulate rather than our small, dispersed cyber-tribe. I can't help but feel that there is an element of role-playing or living vicariously through our personas involved at times. I think NR has a lot to offer to its citizens and to the general public in terms of education, religion, and a lesson in diversity and that this fighting is just a pointless distraction. It can be frustrating, as I'm sure we can all attest to.
     
    Fortunately, I trust that you, and I, and all of us in Nova Roma really do share a common goal, and that will keep us together until the troubles subside. Hopefully everyone will learn to tolerate each other someday, or at the very least NR will grow so large as to allow people to avoid each other. ; )
     
    Caret initio et fine.
     
    Optime Vale,
    T. Annaeus Regulus

    Recent Activity:
    Yahoo! Groups
    Switch to: Text-Only, Daily Digest • Unsubscribe • Terms of Use
    .

    Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72593 From: David Kling Date: 2009-12-15
    Subject: Re: A PUBLIC CALL TO THE FORMER TRIBUNES OF THE PLEBS
    I posted this to the senate:

    Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus M. Iulio Severo salutem dicit

    With all due respect they are no longer tribunes and have not the potestas to issue reports.  They can issue it, but it would be no different than if issued by any other plebeian citizen.  They could do the work of assembling, but if it is to be issued by a tribune it would have to be issued by the current tribunes since the old tribunes have no authority.

    Certainly they should have done it, but did not.  Just like the census should have been done this year but will need to be done next year.  Paulinus cannot do the census next year when he will no longer be censor and I am unable to conduct the census in such a short time as I had hoped to -- some things have made that hope impossible.

    My suggestion would be for you, as consul, to report the meeting of the senate.  As convening magistrate it seems a reasonable assumption that you should report the results -- at least to the senate and the current tribunes can report it to the people.

    Vale;

    Modianus

    On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 3:46 PM, Titus Flavius Aquila <titus.aquila@...> wrote:
     

    Salvete,
     
    I support the public call of our Consul Severus.
     
    Former Tribunes, you are representing the eyes of the Plebeians in the Senate sessions, I call as well on you to provide the missing report of the last Senate session. Please fulfill your duties as you have sworn . Please do not end your term with this missing part of your duty.
     
    Valete bene
    Titus Flavius Aquila
    Quaestor
    Curule Aedile designatus

    Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72594 From: David Kling Date: 2009-12-15
    Subject: Re: Pridie Eidus Decembres: CONSUALIA
    Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus Catoni salutem dicit

    Some people have grown so weary of your demeanor that they simply want you to shut up.  It is less about the constitution and more about people just wanting you to be silent from time to time.  It is about your approach.  Now it seems like you WANT to become a martyr for your "cause."  BTW... what you wrote to Scaeva below I can agree with.  Surprise surprise.

    Vale;

    Modianus 

    On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 12:50 PM, Cato <catoinnyc@...> wrote:
     

    Cato omnibus in foro SPD

    I love the not-so-subtle hints that are being tossed out - better watch out or you won't be here much longer, better choose the "right" side in the coming "tide", etc. These coupled with an arrogance that accepts the action of - even encourages - a magistrate to violate the guarantees offered to our citizens by the Constitution create an appalling vision of the future of our Respublica.

    Modianus, I don't care who is a fan or not, unlike some others here. What I *do* care about is the willingness, the eagerness, of some to simply run rampant over the Constitution and our law based on personal likes and dislikes, rather than an impartial respect for the law.

    Iulius Scaeva, you proudly announce your desire to see a fellow citizen silenced not because of the content of their speech but rather how you *feel* about them. Remember that you "friends" will not always be in "power", so whatever you allow them now you are tacitly allowing all future magistrates - even ones who may find you and your opinions distasteful. That is a short, slippery road into tyranny and abuse - and someday you may be on the receiving end.

    Think carefully before hopping onto that wagon and eagerly waving the flag of censorship.

    Valete,

    Cato


    Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72595 From: Marcus Iulius Scaeva Date: 2009-12-15
    Subject: Re: Pridie Eidus Decembres: CONSUALIA
    Salve Omnibus,
     
    You see how predictable Cato is my friends?
     
    A few carefully, and deliberately, placed phrases and a metaphor and he can't resist the urge to play the victim; as he always does.
     
    Why is it that he chooses to criticize, or nit-pick as some would say, those who he clearly knows do not like him.  Why, because he knows the reaction he will get.  Just as I knew the reaction I would get from him with my "changing tide metaphor".
     
    Once he picks these scabs, and is slapped back, he then carries his prattle forward, on and on, all the time crying he's the victim and that they started it.  This is so transparent it's laughable.
     
    Don't be fooled by his charade.
     
    Veritas vos liberabit.
     
    M. Iulius Scaeva
     

     



    From: Cato <catoinnyc@...>
    To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
    Sent: Tue, December 15, 2009 12:50:48 PM
    Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Pridie Eidus Decembres: CONSUALIA

     

    Cato omnibus in foro SPD

    I love the not-so-subtle hints that are being tossed out - better watch out or you won't be here much longer, better choose the "right" side in the coming "tide", etc. These coupled with an arrogance that accepts the action of - even encourages - a magistrate to violate the guarantees offered to our citizens by the Constitution create an appalling vision of the future of our Respublica.

    Modianus, I don't care who is a fan or not, unlike some others here. What I *do* care about is the willingness, the eagerness, of some to simply run rampant over the Constitution and our law based on personal likes and dislikes, rather than an impartial respect for the law.

    Iulius Scaeva, you proudly announce your desire to see a fellow citizen silenced not because of the content of their speech but rather how you *feel* about them. Remember that you "friends" will not always be in "power", so whatever you allow them now you are tacitly allowing all future magistrates - even ones who may find you and your opinions distasteful. That is a short, slippery road into tyranny and abuse - and someday you may be on the receiving end.

    Think carefully before hopping onto that wagon and eagerly waving the flag of censorship.

    Valete,

    Cato

    Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72596 From: gualterus_graecus Date: 2009-12-15
    Subject: Re: Pridie Eidus Decembres: CONSUALIA
    In other words, you were trolling for a response from him. That says more about you than about him.

    Vale,

    Gualterus

    --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Marcus Iulius Scaeva <johnnormancitron@...> wrote:
    >
    > Salve Omnibus,
    >
    > You see how predictable Cato is my friends?
    >
    > A few carefully, and deliberately, placed phrases and a metaphor and he can't resist the urge to play the victim; as he always does.
    >
    > Why is it that he chooses to criticize, or nit-pick as some would say, those who he clearly knows do not like him.  Why, because he knows the reaction he will get.  Just as I knew the reaction I would get from him with my "changing tide metaphor".
    >
    > Once he picks these scabs, and is slapped back, he then carries his prattle forward, on and on, all the time crying he's the victim and that they started it.  This is so transparent it's laughable.
    >
    > Don't be fooled by his charade.
    >
    > Veritas vos liberabit.
    >
    > M. Iulius Scaeva
    >  
    >  
    >
    >
    >
    >
    > ________________________________
    > From: Cato <catoinnyc@...>
    > To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
    > Sent: Tue, December 15, 2009 12:50:48 PM
    > Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Pridie Eidus Decembres: CONSUALIA
    >
    >  
    > Cato omnibus in foro SPD
    >
    > I love the not-so-subtle hints that are being tossed out - better watch out or you won't be here much longer, better choose the "right" side in the coming "tide", etc. These coupled with an arrogance that accepts the action of - even encourages - a magistrate to violate the guarantees offered to our citizens by the Constitution create an appalling vision of the future of our Respublica.
    >
    > Modianus, I don't care who is a fan or not, unlike some others here. What I *do* care about is the willingness, the eagerness, of some to simply run rampant over the Constitution and our law based on personal likes and dislikes, rather than an impartial respect for the law.
    >
    > Iulius Scaeva, you proudly announce your desire to see a fellow citizen silenced not because of the content of their speech but rather how you *feel* about them. Remember that you "friends" will not always be in "power", so whatever you allow them now you are tacitly allowing all future magistrates - even ones who may find you and your opinions distasteful. That is a short, slippery road into tyranny and abuse - and someday you may be on the receiving end.
    >
    > Think carefully before hopping onto that wagon and eagerly waving the flag of censorship.
    >
    > Valete,
    >
    > Cato
    >
    Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72597 From: publiusalbucius Date: 2009-12-15
    Subject: Adapting threads topics
    Praetor Albucius omnibus s.d.

    Please, cives and members, care changing the topics (titles) of your messages when, from an initial letter, the discussion has moved on a different field. The Consualia thread has nothing left to do with its first contents.

    For those of us who are not interested by all matters dealt here in our Forum, having well spotted threads is a precious tool to save time.

    Thanks to all.


    Valete omnes,


    Albucius pr.
    Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72598 From: rory12001 Date: 2009-12-15
    Subject: Re: Pridie Eidus Decembres: CONSUALIA
    Maior Modiano spd;
    did you say martyrs? I love them; well done with a side of pommes frites would be perfect!
    vale
    Maior

    --
    >
    > Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus Catoni salutem dicit
    >
    > Some people have grown so weary of your demeanor that they simply want you
    > to shut up. It is less about the constitution and more about people just
    > wanting you to be silent from time to time. It is about your approach. Now
    > it seems like you WANT to become a martyr for your "cause." BTW... what you
    > wrote to Scaeva below I can agree with. Surprise surprise.
    >
    > Vale;
    >
    > Modianus
    >
    > On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 12:50 PM, Cato <catoinnyc@...> wrote:
    >
    > >
    > >
    > > Cato omnibus in foro SPD
    > >
    > > I love the not-so-subtle hints that are being tossed out - better watch out
    > > or you won't be here much longer, better choose the "right" side in the
    > > coming "tide", etc. These coupled with an arrogance that accepts the action
    > > of - even encourages - a magistrate to violate the guarantees offered to our
    > > citizens by the Constitution create an appalling vision of the future of our
    > > Respublica.
    > >
    > > Modianus, I don't care who is a fan or not, unlike some others here. What I
    > > *do* care about is the willingness, the eagerness, of some to simply run
    > > rampant over the Constitution and our law based on personal likes and
    > > dislikes, rather than an impartial respect for the law.
    > >
    > > Iulius Scaeva, you proudly announce your desire to see a fellow citizen
    > > silenced not because of the content of their speech but rather how you
    > > *feel* about them. Remember that you "friends" will not always be in
    > > "power", so whatever you allow them now you are tacitly allowing all future
    > > magistrates - even ones who may find you and your opinions distasteful. That
    > > is a short, slippery road into tyranny and abuse - and someday you may be on
    > > the receiving end.
    > >
    > > Think carefully before hopping onto that wagon and eagerly waving the flag
    > > of censorship.
    > >
    > > Valete,
    > >
    > > Cato
    > >
    >
    Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72599 From: David Kling Date: 2009-12-15
    Subject: Re: Pridie Eidus Decembres: CONSUALIA
    Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus Gualtero salutem dicit

    You're kidding right?  What do you think Sulla is trying to accomplish when he launches one of his scathing one liners?  And Cato tries to bait folks all the time.  What you call "trolling," I call "normal in Nova Roma."

    Vale;

    Modianus  

    On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 5:58 PM, gualterus_graecus <waltms1@...> wrote:
     


    In other words, you were trolling for a response from him. That says more about you than about him.

    Vale,

    Gualterus

    Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72600 From: Cato Date: 2009-12-15
    Subject: Re: Pridie Eidus Decembres: CONSUALIA
    Cato Maiori sal.

    You are a terribly sick woman.

    Vale,

    Cato

    --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "rory12001" <rory12001@...> wrote:
    >
    > Maior Modiano spd;
    > did you say martyrs? I love them; well done with a side of pommes frites would be perfect!
    > vale
    > Maior
    Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72601 From: Cato Date: 2009-12-15
    Subject: the current "discussion"
    Cato Modiano sal.

    No, Modianus, I do not "bait" others; in fact, by his own clear admission Scaeva baited me.

    If I think something is wrong, I say so, and explain why. If I can be corrected intelligently, then all the more's the better. If I am correct, the matter stands. But I will not suffer fools, no matter what hats they may wear.

    Bringing in my personal life - however erroneously -, lying about what I have said or not said, and dragging in my cultus privatus constitute the lowest form of response possible.

    Vale,

    Cato


    --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, David Kling <tau.athanasios@...> wrote:
    >
    > Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus Gualtero salutem dicit
    >
    > You're kidding right? What do you think Sulla is trying to accomplish when
    > he launches one of his scathing one liners? And Cato tries to bait folks
    > all the time. What you call "trolling," I call "normal in Nova Roma."
    >
    > Vale;
    >
    > Modianus
    >
    > On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 5:58 PM, gualterus_graecus <waltms1@...>wrote:
    >
    > >
    > >
    > >
    > > In other words, you were trolling for a response from him. That says more
    > > about you than about him.
    > >
    > > Vale,
    > >
    > > Gualterus
    > >
    >
    Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72602 From: rory12001 Date: 2009-12-15
    Subject: Saturnalia fun [was Pridie Eidus Decembres: CONSUALIA]
    Salvete;

    I made a jape to puncture Cato, our very own self-important windbag. Thursday is Saturnalia, a time for merry-making, rude jests,when everything is turned upside down. It is entirely appropriate. The fact that I'm a well-known vegetarian is what makes it a joke!

    Let's turn this thread into jokes, jests, any kind of nonsense for Saturnalia.
    vale
    Maior

    --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Cato" <catoinnyc@...> wrote:
    >
    > Cato Maiori sal.
    >
    > You are a terribly sick woman.
    >
    > Vale,
    >
    > Cato
    >
    > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "rory12001" <rory12001@> wrote:
    > >
    > > Maior Modiano spd;
    > > did you say martyrs? I love them; well done with a side of pommes frites would be perfect!
    > > vale
    > > Maior
    >
    Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72603 From: Marcus Iulius Scaeva Date: 2009-12-15
    Subject: Re: Saturnalia fun [was Pridie Eidus Decembres: CONSUALIA]
    Salve Maior,
     
    Yes.  Let us jest and let us laugh.  Let not Cato's miscreant behaviour distract us from our goals and the great work that is ahead for NR.
     
    Saturnalia is upon us.  Let us rejoice!
     

    Nil Desperandum.
     
    M. Iulius Scaeva 



    From: rory12001 <rory12001@...>
    To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
    Sent: Tue, December 15, 2009 10:34:32 PM
    Subject: [Nova-Roma] Saturnalia fun [was Pridie Eidus Decembres: CONSUALIA]

     

    Salvete;

    I made a jape to puncture Cato, our very own self-important windbag. Thursday is Saturnalia, a time for merry-making, rude jests,when everything is turned upside down. It is entirely appropriate. The fact that I'm a well-known vegetarian is what makes it a joke!

    Let's turn this thread into jokes, jests, any kind of nonsense for Saturnalia.
    vale
    Maior

    --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com, "Cato" <catoinnyc@. ..> wrote:
    >
    > Cato Maiori sal.
    >
    > You are a terribly sick woman.
    >
    > Vale,
    >
    > Cato
    >
    > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com, "rory12001" <rory12001@> wrote:
    > >
    > > Maior Modiano spd;
    > > did you say martyrs? I love them; well done with a side of pommes frites would be perfect!
    > > vale
    > > Maior
    >

    Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72604 From: Marcus Iulius Scaeva Date: 2009-12-15
    Subject: Re: the current "discussion"
    Salve Omnibus,
     
    And the prattle goes on as Cato continues his starring role; forever the victim.
     
    It's everyone else who is wrong, right?  Not Cato. No! Never! Cato?
     
    As I stated before, I baited Cato to prove a point and to demonstrate exactly what HE does on a never ending basis to those against whom he has an ax to grind.
     

    But he would have you believe that he is above such deception even though we have all watched it play out here in the ML, as well as the BA, over and over and over again!
     
    He calls me a fool.  But make no mistake; his "ad hominem" attacks do nothing to change the facts at hand.
     
    Think about all those he has chosen to make comments to and the subsequent discourses that take place.  Think about it at length.  You will see a pattern.
     
    And the pattern will disgust you.
     
    Vale,
     
    M. Iulius Scaeva
     


    From: Cato <catoinnyc@...>
    To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
    Sent: Tue, December 15, 2009 8:37:36 PM
    Subject: [Nova-Roma] the current "discussion"

     

    Cato Modiano sal.

    No, Modianus, I do not "bait" others; in fact, by his own clear admission Scaeva baited me.

    If I think something is wrong, I say so, and explain why. If I can be corrected intelligently, then all the more's the better. If I am correct, the matter stands. But I will not suffer fools, no matter what hats they may wear.

    Bringing in my personal life - however erroneously -, lying about what I have said or not said, and dragging in my cultus privatus constitute the lowest form of response possible.

    Vale,

    Cato

    --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com, David Kling <tau.athanasios@ ...> wrote:
    >
    > Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus Gualtero salutem dicit
    >
    > You're kidding right? What do you think Sulla is trying to accomplish when
    > he launches one of his scathing one liners? And Cato tries to bait folks
    > all the time. What you call "trolling," I call "normal in Nova Roma."
    >
    > Vale;
    >
    > Modianus
    >
    > On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 5:58 PM, gualterus_graecus <waltms1@... >wrote:
    >
    > >
    > >
    > >
    > > In other words, you were trolling for a response from him. That says more
    > > about you than about him.
    > >
    > > Vale,
    > >
    > > Gualterus
    > >
    >

    Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72605 From: gualterus_graecus Date: 2009-12-16
    Subject: Re: Pridie Eidus Decembres: CONSUALIA
    I don't see what Sulla has to do with this; he hasn't posted regularly to the ML in a while now.

    As for Cato, I've not seen him try to bait anyone, and he tends to be ridiculously calm in the face of the abuse he regularly gets. If anything he should be commended for his general composure.

    Vale,

    Gualterus

    --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, David Kling <tau.athanasios@...> wrote:
    >
    > Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus Gualtero salutem dicit
    >
    > You're kidding right? What do you think Sulla is trying to accomplish when
    > he launches one of his scathing one liners? And Cato tries to bait folks
    > all the time. What you call "trolling," I call "normal in Nova Roma."
    >
    > Vale;
    >
    > Modianus
    >
    > On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 5:58 PM, gualterus_graecus <waltms1@...>wrote:
    >
    > >
    > >
    > >
    > > In other words, you were trolling for a response from him. That says more
    > > about you than about him.
    > >
    > > Vale,
    > >
    > > Gualterus
    > >
    >
    Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72606 From: rory12001 Date: 2009-12-16
    Subject: Re: Saturnalia fun [was Pridie Eidus Decembres: CONSUALIA]
    Salve Scaeva;
    absolutely! Hold on, I'm posting my first Saturnalia joke:

    2 philosophers meet:

    1st Philosopher: I'm Johannes Martin, a stoic, and you?

    2nd Philosopher: Gaia Katz, Cynic

    1st. Philosopher: Cynic? what made you a Cynic?

    2nd Philosopher; Mr. Katz

    Bene, bene, it's my first attempt;-)

    King Saturn comes; it's the Golden Age
    let's sing and play; may he never go away...

    Maior
    in pacem Saturni

    >
    > Salve Maior,
    >
    > Yes. Let us jest and let us laugh. Let not Cato's miscreant behaviour distract us from our goals and the great work that is ahead for NR.
    >
    > Saturnalia is upon us.  Let us rejoice!
    > Â Nil Desperandum.
    >
    > M. Iulius ScaevaÂ
    >
    >
    >
    >
    > ________________________________
    > From: rory12001 <rory12001@...>
    > To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
    > Sent: Tue, December 15, 2009 10:34:32 PM
    > Subject: [Nova-Roma] Saturnalia fun [was Pridie Eidus Decembres: CONSUALIA]
    >
    > Â
    > Salvete;
    >
    > I made a jape to puncture Cato, our very own self-important windbag. Thursday is Saturnalia, a time for merry-making, rude jests,when everything is turned upside down. It is entirely appropriate. The fact that I'm a well-known vegetarian is what makes it a joke!
    >
    > Let's turn this thread into jokes, jests, any kind of nonsense for Saturnalia.
    > vale
    > Maior
    >
    > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com, "Cato" <catoinnyc@ ..> wrote:
    > >
    > > Cato Maiori sal.
    > >
    > > You are a terribly sick woman.
    > >
    > > Vale,
    > >
    > > Cato
    > >
    > > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com, "rory12001" <rory12001@> wrote:
    > > >
    > > > Maior Modiano spd;
    > > > did you say martyrs? I love them; well done with a side of pommes frites would be perfect!
    > > > vale
    > > > Maior
    > >
    >
    Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72607 From: C.Maria Caeca Date: 2009-12-16
    Subject: Re: Saturnalia fun [was Pridie Eidus Decembres: CONSUALIA]
    Caeca Maori omnibusque sal,
     
    OK ...you *did* ask for this ...
     
    Two Roman generals walk into a bar.  The first turns to his friend and says: "So which Barbarian land do you think you'll conquer this month?"  "Oh, Gaul, I suppose.  And you?"
    "A place called um ...New York City, I think that's the name."
    "Where's *that*!  I've never heard of it, and I thought I knew all the likely possibilities."
     
    "In the future, of course, but that a minor logistical problem."
     
    C. Maria Caeca, diving into her newly constructed yarn fort!
     
    Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72608 From: rory12001 Date: 2009-12-16
    Subject: Re: Saturnalia fun [was Pridie Eidus Decembres: CONSUALIA]
    Maior Caecae spd;
    recte fecisti that's the Saturnalia spirit! or as we say in latine: hahahae:)
    Maior

    >
    > Caeca Maori omnibusque sal,
    >
    > OK ...you *did* ask for this ...
    >
    > Two Roman generals walk into a bar. The first turns to his friend and says: "So which Barbarian land do you think you'll conquer this month?" "Oh, Gaul, I suppose. And you?"
    > "A place called um ...New York City, I think that's the name."
    > "Where's *that*! I've never heard of it, and I thought I knew all the likely possibilities."
    >
    > "In the future, of course, but that a minor logistical problem."
    >
    > C. Maria Caeca, diving into her newly constructed yarn fort!
    >
    Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72609 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2009-12-16
    Subject: Re: new project
    Re: [Nova-Roma] new project

     A. Tullia Scholastica C. Mariae Caecae Maximae Valeriae Messallinae quiritibus, sociis, peregrinisque bonae voluntatis S.P.D.
     
       

    
    Caeca Messalinae umnibusque sal,

    Why think you, Amica, for doing my bit of editing for me!  I couldn't have done it better, and we've got 4 reasons, now!  21 (or more) to go!

        ATS:  Let me give you another one.  We can not only speak in Latin, we can SING in Latin!  Below is a little ditty to a well-known tune.  I have several others at hand, translated by those more talented at music than I am.  

    vale et valete optime,
    Caeca

    ======

       Mica, mica parva stella (twinkle, twinkle, little star)

    1. Mica, mica, parva stella; miror quaenam sis tam bella; super terra parva pendes alba velut gemma splendes.

        Chorus:  Mica, mica, parva stella, miror, quaenam sis tam bella.
     
    2. Quando fervens sol discessit, qui die natos lacessit, mox ostendis lumen purum  micans, micans, per obscurum.  

        [Chorus]

    3. Tibi noctu qui vagatur ob scintillulam gratatur; ni mica cares tu, non sciret quas per vias errans iret.

        [Chorus]

    4.  Thalamos tu specularis et in alto iam versaris, neque dormis unam horam donec cernimus auroram.  

        [Chorus].  [J. Taylor - H.Drury]

    ========

    Vale, et valete.  


     
       


    Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72610 From: Cato Date: 2009-12-16
    Subject: Re: Saturnalia fun [was Pridie Eidus Decembres: CONSUALIA]
    Cato Maiori sal.

    Rejoicing in the slaughter of innocents for their religious beliefs as witnesses to those beliefs is not a "jape" or "rude jest". It is disturbing in the extreme and entirely inappropriate at any time and is certainly not in tune with the mood of the season.

    Vale,

    Cato

    --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "rory12001" <rory12001@...> wrote:
    >
    > Salvete;
    >
    > I made a jape to puncture Cato, our very own self-important windbag. Thursday is Saturnalia, a time for merry-making, rude jests,when everything is turned upside down. It is entirely appropriate. The fact that I'm a well-known vegetarian is what makes it a joke!
    >
    > Let's turn this thread into jokes, jests, any kind of nonsense for Saturnalia.
    > vale
    > Maior
    >
    > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Cato" <catoinnyc@> wrote:
    > >
    > > Cato Maiori sal.
    > >
    > > You are a terribly sick woman.
    > >
    > > Vale,
    > >
    > > Cato
    > >
    > > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "rory12001" <rory12001@> wrote:
    > > >
    > > > Maior Modiano spd;
    > > > did you say martyrs? I love them; well done with a side of pommes frites would be perfect!
    > > > vale
    > > > Maior
    > >
    >
    Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72611 From: Cato Date: 2009-12-16
    Subject: Re: the current "discussion"
    Cato Scaevae sal.

    Yes, the encouragement of abuse of "power" in the face of our law and Constitution should certainly give pause to intelligent citizens.

    Who has declared my status as a "victim"? Not me. I only caution you from supporting a deliberate betrayal of the very foundations of a society based on equality under the law. Once you celebrate the suppression of freedom based on personality rather than fact you become part of a systematic destruction of all that a free respublica holds dear. The ancient Romans would be equally appalled.

    Perhaps you are comfortable with the idea that a totalitarian government should hold its citizens captive to its whims. I am not.

    Vale,

    Cato

    --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Marcus Iulius Scaeva <johnnormancitron@...> wrote:
    >
    > Salve Omnibus,
    >
    > And the prattle goes on as Cato continues his starring role; forever the victim.
    >
    > It's everyone else who is wrong, right?  Not Cato. No! Never! Cato?
    >
    > As I stated before, I baited Cato to prove a point and to demonstrate exactly what HE does on a never ending basis to those against whom he has an ax to grind.
    >  But he would have you believe that he is above such deception even though we have all watched it play out here in the ML, as well as the BA, over and over and over again!
    > He calls me a fool.  But make no mistake; his "ad hominem" attacks do nothing to change the facts at hand.
    >
    > Think about all those he has chosen to make comments to and the subsequent discourses that take place.  Think about it at length.  You will see a pattern.
    >
    > And the pattern will disgust you.
    >
    > Vale,
    >
    > M. Iulius Scaeva
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >
    > ________________________________
    > From: Cato <catoinnyc@...>
    > To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
    > Sent: Tue, December 15, 2009 8:37:36 PM
    > Subject: [Nova-Roma] the current "discussion"
    >
    >  
    > Cato Modiano sal.
    >
    > No, Modianus, I do not "bait" others; in fact, by his own clear admission Scaeva baited me.
    >
    > If I think something is wrong, I say so, and explain why. If I can be corrected intelligently, then all the more's the better. If I am correct, the matter stands. But I will not suffer fools, no matter what hats they may wear.
    >
    > Bringing in my personal life - however erroneously -, lying about what I have said or not said, and dragging in my cultus privatus constitute the lowest form of response possible.
    >
    > Vale,
    >
    > Cato
    >
    > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com, David Kling <tau.athanasios@ ...> wrote:
    > >
    > > Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus Gualtero salutem dicit
    > >
    > > You're kidding right? What do you think Sulla is trying to accomplish when
    > > he launches one of his scathing one liners? And Cato tries to bait folks
    > > all the time. What you call "trolling," I call "normal in Nova Roma."
    > >
    > > Vale;
    > >
    > > Modianus
    > >
    > > On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 5:58 PM, gualterus_graecus <waltms1@ >wrote:
    > >
    > > >
    > > >
    > > >
    > > > In other words, you were trolling for a response from him. That says more
    > > > about you than about him.
    > > >
    > > > Vale,
    > > >
    > > > Gualterus
    > > >
    > >
    >
    >
    >  
    >
    Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72612 From: marcushoratius Date: 2009-12-16
    Subject: a. d. XVII Kalendas Ianuarias: Saturnalia Eve
    M. Moravius Piscinus Horatianus Quiritibus, cultoribus Deorum et omnibus salute plurimam dicit: Io Saturnalia! Io Triumphe!

    Hodie est ante diem XVII Kalendas Ianuarias; haec dies nefastus est:

    Eve of Saturnalia

    "Do you see how the villagers, outspread o'er the well-worn turf, offer their yearly vows and begin the regular altar-worship? Temples reek of wine; the hollow drums resound to the hands; the Maenalids lead the youthful ring-dances amid the holy rites; joyful sounds the pipe; from the elm hangs the he-goat doomed to sacrifice, and with neck already stripped lays his vitals bare. Surely then the offspring of to day fight with no doubtful hazard? Surely the blockish herd denies not to these times the realms of gold? The days of Saturn have returned with virgin Astraea, the Maid of Justice: the age has returned in safety to the olden ways. With hope unruffled does the harvester garner all his corn-ears; Bacchus betrays the languor of old age; the herd wanders on the lea; we reap with no sword, nor do towns in fast-closed walls prepare unutterable war." Einsidlensibus Eclogis, Carmina Bucolica II. 15-28

    "Who knows not of the Golden Age of the care-free King? when no man subdued fields to his will or sowed grain in them or fended harmful
    weeds from the crops which were to come; when plentious harvests filled the barns to last the year; when, with no tread but his own, Bacchus ran into wine; when honies dripped from clinging leaves, and Pallas made flow her own special streams of rich olive-oil: then had
    the country graciousness. To none was it e'er vouchsafed to know more joyously his own times." ~ Anonymous, Aetna

    "Saturnus, when once He was entertained by a farmer who had a fair daughter named Entoria, seduced her and begat Janus, Hymnus, Faustus,
    and Felix. He then taught Icarius the use of wine and viniculture, and told him that he should share his knowledge with his neighbors
    also. When the neighbors did so and drank more than is customary, they fell into an unusually deep sleep. Imagining that they had been
    poisoned, they pelted Icarius with stones and killed him; and his grandchildren in despair ended their lives by hanging themselves.
    When a plague had gained a wide hold among the Romans, Apollo gave an oracle that it would cease if they should appease the wrath of
    Saturnus and the spirits of those who had perished unlawfully. Lutatius Catulus, one of the nobles, built for the God the precinct
    which lies near the Tarpeian Rock. He made the upper altar with four faces, either because of Icarius' grandchildren or because the year
    has four parts; and he designated a month January. Saturnus placed them all among the stars. The others are called the Harbingers of
    the Vintage, but Janus rises before them. His star is to be seen just in front of the feet of Virgo. So Critolaus in the fourth book of his Phaenomena." ~ Pseudo-Plutarch, Parallela Minora 9


    The Toga

    "Varro informs us, he himself having been an eye-witness, that in the temple of Sancus, the wool was still preserved on the distaff and
    spindle of Tanaquil, who was also called Caia Cæcilia; and he says that the royal waved toga, formerly worn by Servius Tullius, and now
    in the temple of Fortune, was made by her. Hence was derived the custom, on the marriage of a young woman, of carrying in the
    procession a dressed distaff and a spindle, with the thread arranged upon it. Tanaquil was the first who wove the straight Tunica Recta,
    such as our young people wear with the white Toga Pura; newly-married women also. Waved garments were at first the most esteemed of all:
    after which came into vogue those composed of various colours, the Tunica Sororiculata. Fenestella informs us, that togae with a smooth
    surface, as well as the Phryxian togae, began to be used in the latter part of the reign of Augustus. Thick stuffs, in the preparation of which the poppy was used, are of more ancient date, being mentioned by the poet Lucilius, in his lines on Torquatus. The Toga Prætexta had its origin among the Etrurians. I find that the kings first wore the trabea of purple stripes; embroidered garments are mentioned by Homer, and in this class originated the triumphal robes." ~ C. Plinius Secundus Maior, Historia Naturalis 8.74


    Our thought for today is taken from Seneca, On Clemency, 1.1

    "Today, if the immortal Gods should require a reckoning from me, I am ready to report the human race intact."

    Hodie Dis immortals, si a me rationem repentant, adnumerare geunus humanum paratus sum.
    Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72613 From: marcus.lucretius Date: 2009-12-16
    Subject: Roman Days 2010 June 5, 6
    Agricola Omnibus sal.

    Here is a gift from our friends and allies in Legio XX. They have a wiki set up for Roman Days at wikispaces: http://romandays.wikispaces.com/

    They have a new location and have just set the June dates.

    bene valete in cura deorum
    Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72614 From: publiusalbucius Date: 2009-12-16
    Subject: Praetorial reminder to our orators
    Praetor Albucius omnibus s.d.

    Thanks for having adapted your threads topics.

    Now a reminder:

    1/ whatever the interest you see in your discussions, and the time you need evoking the various merits and defaults of one of us, keep on respecting each other, and mind not sliding in assimilations which would bring you assess that, because X is a Y practitioner, it would implicitly "show" that "obviously", if X is bad, in your mind, one may deduct that Y cultus is bad;

    2/ keep pls also in mind that, if you want to avoid answers backed up on a peculiar belief, philosophy, etc. , it is better refraining using words who have a meaning in this belief or philosophy, and may not, in addition, be meaningful in our Roman tradition (ex. the concept of "martyr");

    3/ When joking, try to think, if necessary twice, before issuing a good word in the Forum, where various sensibilities express: what would give the opportunity of a good time among friends in a triclinium may hurt here. For example, the appreciation that "martyrs" would be "well done with a side of pommes frites" is not appropriate here, and, this said, unhistorical: Romans were and are still not cannibals, and I doubt lions would either be considered as Roman citizens (as in Roman Law animals were "res") or sit at a table, put their napkin round their neck, and ask for pommes frites;

    4/ The coming of Saturnalia, which is *tomorrow*, cannot be a ground allowing us such situatiions. First because Saturnalia comes tomorrow, and we are today (sorry to be obliged reminding this obvious fact); second for the spirit of Saturnalia did not, in my knowledge, contain calls for chasing minorities or their beliefs;

    5/ Last, as I have already reminded it this year, the higher our quality in our Roman society, the more we need to think twice before dropping our opinions in the Forum. A senator, a magistrate or a designated magistrate has more duties about her/his behavior, and especially when he/she has been or will be in charge of this Forum.

    Thanks to all, and have a good Saturnalia nevertheless, omnes with families. :-)

    Valete,


    P. Memmius Albucius
    praetor, cos. des.
    Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72615 From: John Citron Date: 2009-12-16
    Subject: Re: the current "discussion"
    Salve Cato,

    Well my friend, if you fully read, and actually comprehended my comments, you should have figured out, considering I clearly pointed it out, that those particular comments were merely literal devices used as bait.

    I do not believe in tyranny, censorship, or any other un-democratic notion.

    I believe in the constitution of NR. However I don't go around fear mongering of its demise every time someone criticizes my speech.

    There are too many good and noble officials here in NR that would never allow your doomsday scenario to occur.

    Vale,

    M. Iulius Scaeva


    --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Cato" <catoinnyc@...> wrote:
    >
    > Cato Scaevae sal.
    >
    > Yes, the encouragement of abuse of "power" in the face of our law and Constitution should certainly give pause to intelligent citizens.
    >
    > Who has declared my status as a "victim"? Not me. I only caution you from supporting a deliberate betrayal of the very foundations of a society based on equality under the law. Once you celebrate the suppression of freedom based on personality rather than fact you become part of a systematic destruction of all that a free respublica holds dear. The ancient Romans would be equally appalled.
    >
    > Perhaps you are comfortable with the idea that a totalitarian government should hold its citizens captive to its whims. I am not.
    >
    > Vale,
    >
    > Cato
    >
    > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Marcus Iulius Scaeva <johnnormancitron@> wrote:
    > >
    > > Salve Omnibus,
    > >
    > > And the prattle goes on as Cato continues his starring role; forever the victim.
    > >
    > > It's everyone else who is wrong, right?  Not Cato. No! Never! Cato?
    > >
    > > As I stated before, I baited Cato to prove a point and to demonstrate exactly what HE does on a never ending basis to those against whom he has an ax to grind.
    > >  But he would have you believe that he is above such deception even though we have all watched it play out here in the ML, as well as the BA, over and over and over again!
    > > He calls me a fool.  But make no mistake; his "ad hominem" attacks do nothing to change the facts at hand.
    > >
    > > Think about all those he has chosen to make comments to and the subsequent discourses that take place.  Think about it at length.  You will see a pattern.
    > >
    > > And the pattern will disgust you.
    > >
    > > Vale,
    > >
    > > M. Iulius Scaeva
    > >
    > >
    > >
    > >
    > >
    > > ________________________________
    > > From: Cato <catoinnyc@>
    > > To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
    > > Sent: Tue, December 15, 2009 8:37:36 PM
    > > Subject: [Nova-Roma] the current "discussion"
    > >
    > >  
    > > Cato Modiano sal.
    > >
    > > No, Modianus, I do not "bait" others; in fact, by his own clear admission Scaeva baited me.
    > >
    > > If I think something is wrong, I say so, and explain why. If I can be corrected intelligently, then all the more's the better. If I am correct, the matter stands. But I will not suffer fools, no matter what hats they may wear.
    > >
    > > Bringing in my personal life - however erroneously -, lying about what I have said or not said, and dragging in my cultus privatus constitute the lowest form of response possible.
    > >
    > > Vale,
    > >
    > > Cato
    > >
    > > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com, David Kling <tau.athanasios@ ...> wrote:
    > > >
    > > > Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus Gualtero salutem dicit
    > > >
    > > > You're kidding right? What do you think Sulla is trying to accomplish when
    > > > he launches one of his scathing one liners? And Cato tries to bait folks
    > > > all the time. What you call "trolling," I call "normal in Nova Roma."
    > > >
    > > > Vale;
    > > >
    > > > Modianus
    > > >
    > > > On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 5:58 PM, gualterus_graecus <waltms1@ >wrote:
    > > >
    > > > >
    > > > >
    > > > >
    > > > > In other words, you were trolling for a response from him. That says more
    > > > > about you than about him.
    > > > >
    > > > > Vale,
    > > > >
    > > > > Gualterus
    > > > >
    > > >
    > >
    > >
    > >  
    > >
    >
    Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72616 From: C.Maria Caeca Date: 2009-12-16
    Subject: Re: new project
    
    Caeca Scholasticae omnibusque sal,
     
    wonderful!  OK, 5 ...and I'll add another in a minute.  BTW, I trust we will be hearing that charming little sung on the net podcast?  Now we've got 5 reasons, all given by the ladies of NR!  Hmmm ...gentlemen, get busy, or we shall have to found the No. 1 Ladies' um, list creation agency!
     
    6.  If you know Latin, you can read your chart, and know more about it than you doctor, who probably hasn't studied Latin.
     
    Vale optime,
    Caeca
    Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72617 From: Marcus Iulius Scaeva Date: 2009-12-16
    Subject: Re: Saturnalia fun [was Pridie Eidus Decembres: CONSUALIA]
    Salve Maior,
     
    I found this Roman joke on the net at http://www.jokesandhumor.com/jokes/273.html
     
    The slave driver of the Roman trireme leered down at his galley slaves and bellowed, "I've got some good news and some bad news. The good news is that you'll be getting double rations tonight!" The murmuring of the surprised slaves as they struggled with their oars was interrupted by the slave driver. "The bad news is that this afternoon the commander's son wants to water-ski." 

     

    Have a merry Saturnalia!

     
    Vale,
     
    M. Iulius Scaeva
     

     

     



    From: rory12001 <rory12001@...>
    To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
    Sent: Tue, December 15, 2009 10:34:32 PM
    Subject: [Nova-Roma] Saturnalia fun [was Pridie Eidus Decembres: CONSUALIA]

     

    Salvete;

    I made a jape to puncture Cato, our very own self-important windbag. Thursday is Saturnalia, a time for merry-making, rude jests,when everything is turned upside down. It is entirely appropriate. The fact that I'm a well-known vegetarian is what makes it a joke!

    Let's turn this thread into jokes, jests, any kind of nonsense for Saturnalia.
    vale
    Maior

    --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com, "Cato" <catoinnyc@. ..> wrote:
    >
    > Cato Maiori sal.
    >
    > You are a terribly sick woman.
    >
    > Vale,
    >
    > Cato
    >
    > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com, "rory12001" <rory12001@> wrote:
    > >
    > > Maior Modiano spd;
    > > did you say martyrs? I love them; well done with a side of pommes frites would be perfect!
    > > vale
    > > Maior
    >

    Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72618 From: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com Date: 2009-12-16
    Subject: SATVRNALIA, 12/17/2009, 12:00 am
    Reminder from:   Nova-Roma Yahoo! Group
     
    Title:   SATVRNALIA
     
    Date:   Thursday December 17, 2009
    Time:   All Day
    Repeats:   This event repeats every year.
    Notes:   Io Saturnalia!!

    "...but suddenly shouted with one accord the well-known cry, 'Io Saturnalia'... " Cassius Dio LX.19.3

    Today is the first day of Saturnalia!
     
    Copyright © 2009  Yahoo! Inc. All Rights Reserved | Terms of Service | Privacy Policy
    Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72619 From: rory12001 Date: 2009-12-16
    Subject: Re: Saturnalia fun [was Pridie Eidus Decembres: CONSUALIA]
    Bene Scaeva
    Hehe; to continue our nautical theme

    here is an ancient joke from the Philgelos "The Laughter-lover

    "An intellectual was on a sea voyage when a big storm blew up, causing his slaves to weep in terror. `Don't cry,' he consoled them, `I have freed you all in my will'" (no. 25)

    Saturnalia is tomorrow night!
    vale
    Maior



    --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Marcus Iulius Scaeva <johnnormancitron@...> wrote:
    >
    > Salve Maior,
    > Â
    > I found this Roman joke on the net at http://www.jokesandhumor.com/jokes/273.html
    > Â
    > The slave driver of the Roman trireme leered down at his galley slaves and bellowed, "I've got some good news and some bad news. The good news is that you'll be getting double rations tonight!" The murmuring of the surprised slaves as they struggled with their oars was interrupted by the slave driver. "The bad news is that this afternoon the commander's son wants to water-ski."Â
    > Â
    > Have a merry Saturnalia!
    >
    > Vale,
    >
    > M. Iulius Scaeva
    >
    >
    > Â
    > Â
    >
    >
    >
    >
    > ________________________________
    > From: rory12001 <rory12001@...>
    > To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
    > Sent: Tue, December 15, 2009 10:34:32 PM
    > Subject: [Nova-Roma] Saturnalia fun [was Pridie Eidus Decembres: CONSUALIA]
    >
    > Â
    > Salvete;
    >
    > I made a jape to puncture Cato, our very own self-important windbag. Thursday is Saturnalia, a time for merry-making, rude jests,when everything is turned upside down. It is entirely appropriate. The fact that I'm a well-known vegetarian is what makes it a joke!
    >
    > Let's turn this thread into jokes, jests, any kind of nonsense for Saturnalia.
    > vale
    > Maior
    >
    > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com, "Cato" <catoinnyc@ ..> wrote:
    > >
    > > Cato Maiori sal.
    > >
    > > You are a terribly sick woman.
    > >
    > > Vale,
    > >
    > > Cato
    > >
    > > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com, "rory12001" <rory12001@> wrote:
    > > >
    > > > Maior Modiano spd;
    > > > did you say martyrs? I love them; well done with a side of pommes frites would be perfect!
    > > > vale
    > > > Maior
    > >
    >
    Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72620 From: C.Maria Caeca Date: 2009-12-16
    Subject: Re: Saturnalia fun [was Pridie Eidus Decembres: CONSUALIA]
    Salvete Omnes,
     
    This would be *so* much more fun if I had the skills to do it in Latin ...but I shall have to wait, and work, *really hard* for that!  Meanwhile ...this is my own ...creative attempt.
     
    Apparently, a large cashed of tablets have been found in a heap, buried among what appears to be vegetation, near the forum.  Archaeologists speculate that these tablets were placed in some shrubbery, of some sort.  All of this is in the close vicinity of what may be the remains of a large urn or planter.  One such tablet has been examined and translated, although the others seem to be on various topics.  Here is an approximate translation:
     
    Honey, on your way home, could you stop and get some bread from the baker, some wine from that little wine shop we found the other day, and leave a message at the baths for Tertia the tunic maker?  Tell he I'll be in to look at material for my new festival tunic tomorrow, some time.  Oh!  And stop at the yarn shop!  I need 3 skeins of that heavy wool from Germania that arrived last week.
     
    Love,
    Calpernia
     
    Scholars decline to speculate on the identity of either the writer or the recipient, but some are asking ...could this, perhaps, be the first "honey, do" list?
     
    Happy Saturnalia!
     
    Valete bene,
    Caeca, who understands her examination is in the process of being graded, so wonders if the above was ...is ...gallows humor, (grin)
    Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72621 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2009-12-16
    Subject: Re: new project
    Re: [Nova-Roma] new project

     
    A. Tullia Scholastica C. Mariae Caecae quiritibus, sociis, peregrinisque bonae voluntatis  S.P.D.

       

    
    Caeca Scholasticae omnibusque sal,

    wonderful!  OK, 5 ...and I'll add another in a minute.  BTW, I trust we will be hearing that charming little sung on the net podcast?  

        ATS:  Only if Emilia Curia Finnica or some other talented party sings it.  I have LOTS more songs in Latin, many American patriotic, but many others, too, such as Gaudeamus igitur, Santa Lucia, Lilia Marlena, two versions of Frère Jacques...and for the season, There is a Tavern in the Town...

    Now we've got 5 reasons, all given by the ladies of NR!  Hmmm ...gentlemen, get busy, or we shall have to found the No. 1 Ladies' um, list creation agency!

        ATS:  Now, we are MUCH more creative than the guys...besides, they’re busy watching football.  

    6.  If you know Latin, you can read your chart, and know more about it than you doctor, who probably hasn't studied Latin.

        ATS:   LOL!  I sure know what BID, TID, QID, HS, HC, OD, OS, per os, stat, and a bunch of other med school jargon means...and where these words and phrases came from, plus what RX *really* means!  Stat is from statim...

        The older doctors might know Latin as it was required for medical school, just as my next door neighbors had to know Latin for law school.  Meá sententiá, things were better when the various professional schools required Latin as a prerequisite for admission.   

    Vale optime,
    Caeca

       Vale optime!

    Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72622 From: Marcus Iulius Scaeva Date: 2009-12-16
    Subject: Re: Saturnalia fun [was Pridie Eidus Decembres: CONSUALIA]
    Salve Maior,
     
    Now that is funny!
     
    I've seen references to the Philogelos before but I must confess I've never taken the time to check it out.
     
    Yeah, I know Saturnalia is tomorrow but I just felt in the mood to say it.
     
    Besides, tomorrow I will say Bona Saturnalia!
     
    Vale,
     
    Scaeva
     

     



    From: rory12001 <rory12001@...>
    To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
    Sent: Wed, December 16, 2009 7:10:25 PM
    Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Saturnalia fun [was Pridie Eidus Decembres: CONSUALIA]

     

    Bene Scaeva
    Hehe; to continue our nautical theme

    here is an ancient joke from the Philgelos "The Laughter-lover

    "An intellectual was on a sea voyage when a big storm blew up, causing his slaves to weep in terror. `Don't cry,' he consoled them, `I have freed you all in my will'" (no. 25)

    Saturnalia is tomorrow night!
    vale
    Maior

    --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com, Marcus Iulius Scaeva <johnnormancitron@ ...> wrote:
    >
    > Salve Maior,
    > Â
    > I found this Roman joke on the net at http://www.jokesand humor.com/ jokes/273. html
    > Â
    > The slave driver of the Roman trireme leered down at his galley slaves and bellowed, "I've got some good news and some bad news. The good news is that you'll be getting double rations tonight!" The murmuring of the surprised slaves as they struggled with their oars was interrupted by the slave driver. "The bad news is that this afternoon the commander's son wants to water-ski."Â
    > Â
    > Have a merry Saturnalia!
    >
    > Vale,
    >
    > M. Iulius Scaeva
    >
    >
    > Â
    > Â
    >
    >
    >
    >
    > ____________ _________ _________ __
    > From: rory12001 <rory12001@. ..>
    > To: Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com
    > Sent: Tue, December 15, 2009 10:34:32 PM
    > Subject: [Nova-Roma] Saturnalia fun [was Pridie Eidus Decembres: CONSUALIA]
    >
    > Â
    > Salvete;
    >
    > I made a jape to puncture Cato, our very own self-important windbag. Thursday is Saturnalia, a time for merry-making, rude jests,when everything is turned upside down. It is entirely appropriate. The fact that I'm a well-known vegetarian is what makes it a joke!
    >
    > Let's turn this thread into jokes, jests, any kind of nonsense for Saturnalia.
    > vale
    > Maior
    >
    > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com, "Cato" <catoinnyc@ ..> wrote:
    > >
    > > Cato Maiori sal.
    > >
    > > You are a terribly sick woman.
    > >
    > > Vale,
    > >
    > > Cato
    > >
    > > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com, "rory12001" <rory12001@> wrote:
    > > >
    > > > Maior Modiano spd;
    > > > did you say martyrs? I love them; well done with a side of pommes frites would be perfect!
    > > > vale
    > > > Maior
    > >
    >

    Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72623 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2009-12-17
    Subject: Re: Saturnalia fun [was Pridie Eidus Decembres: CONSUALIA]
    Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: Saturnalia fun    [was  Pridie Eidus Decembres: CONSUALIA]

     A. Tullia Scholastica C. Mariae Caecae quiritibus, sociis, peregrinisque bonae voluntatis S.P.D.
     
       

    Salvete Omnes,

    This would be *so* much more fun if I had the skills to do it in Latin ...but I shall have to wait, and work, *really hard* for that!  Meanwhile ...this is my own ...creative attempt.

       <snip>

        ATS:  I think you will get there someday.  You are a diligent student, and that counts for a lot.   When you finish Grammatica II next year, you will be much better equipped for that (and will be even after this year), and then I think you might want to consider taking Sermo.  

        BTW, there is that dinner invitation from Vindolanda; maybe that went with the honey-do list.  

    Happy Saturnalia!

    Valete bene,
    Caeca, who understands her examination is in the process of being graded, so wonders if the above was ...is ...gallows humor, (grin)

        ATS:  Well, I have finished correcting the vocabulary and declension sections of your paper, and if the rest bears up, you should not only pass, but do quite well on this.  There is no gallows in your future.  Macte virtúte!  

        Happy Saturnalia to those who observe this holiday!  

    Vale, et valete.  

       

    Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72624 From: luciaiuliaaquila Date: 2009-12-17
    Subject: Io Saturnalia!!!! Joyous Saturnalia to all!!!
    Salvete omnes!

    Audite! Scitisne quantus numerus barbarorum satis est ut ipsi facem accendere possint?
    Decies centena milia- uno facem tenente, debent ceteri convenire atque conari ignem invenire!

    Listen! Do you know how many barbarians it takes to light a torch?
    One million - one to hold the torch, and the rest to get together and try to discover fire!

    Valete optime!

    Abeo!

    Julia~
    Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72625 From: luciaiuliaaquila Date: 2009-12-17
    Subject: Re: Classic Poetry, Prose, Proems, Literature Excerpts
    Salvete omnes,

    It's late, and part of Saturnalia is telling and listening to old tales of gods and heroes and I would like to offer this for the first day of Saturnalia, sit back , relax and listen, rejuvenate for the days of partying ahead:
    Aeneid,Vergilius
    English:
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4CrbuZOk69Y
    As for the Latin, I have not found anything I really like online (that is not in several parts) but do catch Cordus and our magistra on the podcast archive reading the Aeneid.

    Io Saturnalia!

    Valete optime!

    Julia


    --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "luciaiuliaaquila" <dis_pensible@...> wrote:
    >
    > Salvéte, amícae et amící!
    >
    >
    > Laus Veneris
    >
    > PALLID with too much longing,
    > White with passion and prayer,
    > Goddess of love and beauty,
    > She sits in the picture there,—
    >
    > Sits with her dark eyes seeking
    > Something more subtle still
    > Than the old delights of loving
    > Her measureless days to fill.
    >
    > She has loved and been loved so often
    > In her long, immortal years,
    > That she tires of the worn-out rapture,
    > Sickens of hopes and fears.
    >
    > No joys or sorrows move her,
    > Done with her ancient pride;
    > For her head she found too heavy
    > The crown she has cast aside.
    >
    > Clothed in her scarlet splendor,
    > Bright with her glory of hair,
    > Sad that she is not mortal,—
    > Eternally sad and fair,
    >
    > Longing for joys she knows not,
    > Athirst with a vain desire,
    > There she sits in the picture,
    > Daughter of foam and fire.
    >
    >
    > By Louise Chandler Moulton
    >
    > A bit sad but I do not think she longs to be mortal as she experiences mortality through us mortals...
    >
    > Optimé valéte in pace Veneris
    >
    > L. Iulia Aquila
    >
    Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72626 From: luciaiuliaaquila Date: 2009-12-17
    Subject: Re: Roman Days 2010 June 5, 6
    Salve Agricola,

    I may be able to pull this off, sounds interesting.

    Gratias tibi ago amici,

    Bene vale in pace deorum,

    Julia

    --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "marcus.lucretius" <marcus.lucretius@...> wrote:
    >
    > Agricola Omnibus sal.
    >
    > Here is a gift from our friends and allies in Legio XX. They have a wiki set up for Roman Days at wikispaces: http://romandays.wikispaces.com/
    >
    > They have a new location and have just set the June dates.
    >
    > bene valete in cura deorum
    >
    Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72627 From: Titus Flavius Aquila Date: 2009-12-17
    Subject: AW: [Nova-Roma] Io Saturnalia!!!! Joyous Saturnalia to all!!!
    Salvete Quirites,
     
    Io Saturnalia !
     
    A very happy and joyful Saturnalia to all of you. Enjoy this very special time of the year.
     
    It is the time to celebrate,  to give little gifts to friends and the beloved, to eat, to drink, and to be merry. The toga is not worn, instead we have unconventional clothing ! 
     
    We shout it out loud   Io Saturnalia !  Io Saturnalia ! Io Saturnalia !
     
    Valete bene
    Titus Flavius Aquila


    Von: luciaiuliaaquila <dis_pensible@...>
    An: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
    Gesendet: Donnerstag, den 17. Dezember 2009, 7:57:12 Uhr
    Betreff: [Nova-Roma] Io Saturnalia!!!! Joyous Saturnalia to all!!!

     

    Salvete omnes!

    Audite! Scitisne quantus numerus barbarorum satis est ut ipsi facem accendere possint?
    Decies centena milia- uno facem tenente, debent ceteri convenire atque conari ignem invenire!

    Listen! Do you know how many barbarians it takes to light a torch?
    One million - one to hold the torch, and the rest to get together and try to discover fire!

    Valete optime!

    Abeo!

    Julia~


    __________________________________________________
    Do You Yahoo!?
    Sie sind Spam leid? Yahoo! Mail verfügt über einen herausragenden Schutz gegen Massenmails.
    http://mail.yahoo.com
    Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72628 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2009-12-17
    Subject: More Saturnalia fun: jocí Latíné
    More Saturnalia fun:  jocí Latíné A. Tullia Scholastica quiritibus, sociis, peregrinisque bonae voluntatis S.P.D.

        Now that Caeca’s fate is temporarily sealed, I can turn to lighter fare before heading on to the next paper, so here are a few jokes in Latin for the cognoscenti.  Translations will be provided for those unfortunates who do not yet know Latin.  

        ====

        Prima:  Cur non reddidisti anulum quam tu invenisti?  

        Secunda:  Non putavi esse necesse.

        Prima:  Quomodo?

        Secunda:  In anulo scriptum est:  Tuus in aeternum.

        [First woman:  Why didn’t you return the ring which you found?

        Second woman:  I didn’t think it was necessary.

        First woman:  Why?

        Second woman:  On the ring is the inscription [it is written] Yours for eternity].  

    =====

        Civis:  Aliquis, custos, mihi magnam alapam duxit.

        Custos publicus:  Quis erat ille vir?

        Civis:  Nescio; sed autem vestigia illius digitorum in meo vultu sunt impressa.

        [Citizen:  Officer, someone gave me a hard slap.  

        Police officer:  Who was that guy?

        Citizen:  I dunno, but the marks of his fingers are printed on my face].  

    ========

        And especially for the season:  

        Mulier:  Quomodo tantum potare assuevisti?

        Vir:  Propter res familiares.

        Mulier:  Fortasse tuum matrimonium est infelix?

        Vir:  Non.  Sed habeo tres affines qui omnes caupones sunt.

        [Woman:  How did you become accustomed to drink so much?

        Man:  Because of family matters.

        Woman:  Is your marriage unhappy, by any chance?

        Man:  No, but I have three relatives all of whom are innkeepers/tavern owners.  

            ---all from Auxilium Latinum of long ago, translated by yours truly.    

    ======

        Fruimini!  Enjoy!

        Valete.
    Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72629 From: rory12001 Date: 2009-12-17
    Subject: Re: Roman Days 2010 June 5, 6
    Salve Julia amica;
    I would go too, I was so sorry to miss you at the Conventus, it would be wonderful to get together, meet & talk, endlessly I bet;-) Let's get Piscinus too, hmm maybe we could have a lectisterium.
    vale in pacem Saturni
    Maior


    > Salve Agricola,
    >
    > I may be able to pull this off, sounds interesting.
    >
    > Gratias tibi ago amici,
    >
    > Bene vale in pace deorum,
    >
    > Julia
    >
    > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "marcus.lucretius" <marcus.lucretius@> wrote:
    > >
    > > Agricola Omnibus sal.
    > >
    > > Here is a gift from our friends and allies in Legio XX. They have a wiki set up for Roman Days at wikispaces: http://romandays.wikispaces.com/
    > >
    > > They have a new location and have just set the June dates.
    > >
    > > bene valete in cura deorum
    > >
    >
    Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72630 From: rory12001 Date: 2009-12-17
    Subject: Re: Io Saturnalia!!!! Joyous Saturnalia to all!!!
    Salvete Quirites;
    Io Saturnalia!
    a wonderful joyous Saturnalia to everyone!!

    Oh Julia you had me laughing so, that was too funny for words, a perfect way to being our holiday

    Io Saturnalia Titus Aquila!
    Io Saturnalia Scaeva!
    Io Saturnalia Caeca Scholasticaque!!

    make merry, have wine and fun & lots of nonsense; remember the golden age of King Saturn when all was peace and plenty.
    Io Saturnalia!!
    Maior

    --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Titus Flavius Aquila <titus.aquila@...> wrote:
    >
    > Salvete Quirites,
    >
    > Io Saturnalia !
    >
    > A very happy and joyful Saturnalia to all of you. Enjoy this very special time of the year.
    >
    > It is the time to celebrate,  to give little gifts to friends and the beloved, to eat, to drink, and to be merry. The toga is not worn, instead we have unconventional clothing !Â
    >
    > We shout it out loud  Io Saturnalia ! Io Saturnalia ! Io Saturnalia !
    >
    > Valete bene
    > Titus Flavius Aquila
    >
    >
    >
    >
    > ________________________________
    > Von: luciaiuliaaquila <dis_pensible@...>
    > An: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
    > Gesendet: Donnerstag, den 17. Dezember 2009, 7:57:12 Uhr
    > Betreff: [Nova-Roma] Io Saturnalia!!!! Joyous Saturnalia to all!!!
    >
    > Â
    > Salvete omnes!
    >
    > Audite! Scitisne quantus numerus barbarorum satis est ut ipsi facem accendere possint?
    > Decies centena milia- uno facem tenente, debent ceteri convenire atque conari ignem invenire!
    >
    > Listen! Do you know how many barbarians it takes to light a torch?
    > One million - one to hold the torch, and the rest to get together and try to discover fire!
    >
    > Valete optime!
    >
    > Abeo!
    >
    > Julia~
    >
    >
    >
    >
    > __________________________________________________
    > Do You Yahoo!?
    > Sie sind Spam leid? Yahoo! Mail verfügt über einen herausragenden Schutz gegen Massenmails.
    > http://mail.yahoo.com
    >
    Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72631 From: marcushoratius Date: 2009-12-17
    Subject: a. d. XVI Kalendas Ianuarias: SATURNALIA
    M. Moravius Piscinus Horatianus cultoribus Deorum, Quiritibus et omnibus salutem plurimam dicit: Io Saturnalia! Io Triumphe!

    Hodie est ante diem XVI Kalendas Ianuarias; haec dies nefastus est: Saturnalia: feriae Saturno ad forum; Sol in Capricornum transitum facit, brumale solstitium, ut Hipparcho placet; itaque tempestatem saepe significat.

    Now the last age by Cumae's Sibyl sung
    Has come and gone, and the majestic roll
    Of circling centuries begins anew:
    The Virgin returns, returns old Saturn's reign,
    With a new breed of men sent down from Heaven. ~ Virgil, Eclogue IV

    "How well lived folk in olden days when Saturn was the King, before the earth was opened out for distant travel! Not as yet had the pine-tree learned to scorn the blue sea wave or offered the spreading sail to belly before the wind; nor seeking gain in unlnown lands, had the vagrant seaman loaded his bark with foreign wares. That was a time when the sturdy bull had not bent his neck to the yoke, nor the tamed hores champed the bit. No house had doors; no stone was planted on the land to set fixed boundaries to men's estates. The very oaks gave honey; and with milky udders came the ewes unbidden to meet the carefree swain. Then were no marshaled hosts, no lust for blood, no battles, no swords had been forged by the cruel armourer's ruthless skill." ~ Albius Tibullus 1.3.35-48

    AUC 256 / 497 BCE: Origin of Saturnalia

    "During the consulship of A. Sempronius and M. Minucius an altar was dedicated to Saturn and the festival of the Saturnalia instituted." ~ Titus Livius 2.21

    AUC 536 / 217 BCE: Origin of the lecisternium of Saturnus and the convivium

    "A decree was passed that to avert the evils which portents forebode, sacrifices should be offered, the victims to be both full-grown animals and sucklings, and also that special intercessions should be made at all the shrines for three days. What other ceremonial was necessary was to be carried out in accordance with the instructions of the decemvirs after they had inspected the Sibylline Oracles and ascertained the will of the Gods. On their advice it was decreed that the first votive offering should be made to Jupiter in the shape of a golden thunderbolt weighing fifty pounds, gifts of silver to Juno and Minerva, and sacrifices of full-grown victims to Queen Juno on the Aventine and Juno Sospita at Lanuvium, whilst the matrons were to contribute according to their means and bear their gift to Queen Juno on the Aventine. A lectisternium was to be held, and even the freedwomen were to contribute what they could for a gift to the temple of Feronia. When these instructions had been carried out the decemvirs sacrificed full-grown victims in the forum at Ardea, and finally in the middle of December there was a sacrifice at the temple precinct of Saturn, a lectisternium was ordered, the senators prepared the couch, and a public banquet (convivium) held. For a day and a night the cry of the Saturnalia resounded through the City, and the people were ordered to make that day a festival and observe it as such forever." ~ Titus Livius 22.1.19

    Plutarch, Roman Questions 11: "Why do they sacrifice to Saturnus with the head uncovered?

    "Is it because Aeneas instituted the custom of covering the head, and the sacrifice to Saturnus dates from long before that time? Or is it that they cover the head before the heavenly deities, but they consider Saturnus a God whose realm is beneath the earth? Or is it that no part of Truth is covered or overshadowed, and the Romans consider Saturnus Father of Truth?"

    The first day of Saturnalia begins as a solemn religious occasion with a morning sacrifice followed later in the day with a sacramental meal. The sacrifice, possibly a pig, was performed in ritus Graecus (Festus-Paul. Lindsay p.274.29-32). Violets, storax, and costus were used as incense for Him. Senators and the Equites wore togae during the lectisternium and the sacrifice that followed, but laid these aside during the public convivium. In donning their special togae praetexta for Senators, and the red cloaks of those Equites given public horses, they displayed the echelons of Roman society. In putting aside their togae they removed the symbols of their rank, all Roman citizens joined together in equality as was assumed was their condition during the rule of Saturnus in the Golden Age. From the banquet tables they would then go throughout the City with shouts:

    IO TRIUMPHE! IO SATURNALIA!


    AUC 822 / 69 CE: The Army of Vitellius at Narnia in Etruria, survivors of the Second Battle of Cremona, went over to the Flavians.


    A thought for today comes to us from L. Annaeus Seneca, Epistle 19:

    "Apply this maxim of the wise: consider that it is more important who receives a thing, than what it is he receives."
    Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72632 From: publiusalbucius Date: 2009-12-17
    Subject: Re: a. d. XVI Kalendas Ianuarias: SATURNALIA
    Quirites,


    Salvete, valete et Io Saturnalia omnes!


    P. Memmius Albucius



    --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "marcushoratius" <MHoratius@...> wrote:
    >
    > M. Moravius Piscinus Horatianus cultoribus Deorum, Quiritibus et omnibus salutem plurimam dicit: Io Saturnalia! Io Triumphe!
    >
    > Hodie est ante diem XVI Kalendas Ianuarias; haec dies nefastus est: Saturnalia: feriae Saturno ad forum; Sol in Capricornum transitum facit, brumale solstitium, ut Hipparcho placet; itaque tempestatem saepe significat.
    >
    > Now the last age by Cumae's Sibyl sung
    > Has come and gone, and the majestic roll
    > Of circling centuries begins anew:
    > The Virgin returns, returns old Saturn's reign,
    > With a new breed of men sent down from Heaven. ~ Virgil, Eclogue IV
    >
    > "How well lived folk in olden days when Saturn was the King, before the earth was opened out for distant travel! Not as yet had the pine-tree learned to scorn the blue sea wave or offered the spreading sail to belly before the wind; nor seeking gain in unlnown lands, had the vagrant seaman loaded his bark with foreign wares. That was a time when the sturdy bull had not bent his neck to the yoke, nor the tamed hores champed the bit. No house had doors; no stone was planted on the land to set fixed boundaries to men's estates. The very oaks gave honey; and with milky udders came the ewes unbidden to meet the carefree swain. Then were no marshaled hosts, no lust for blood, no battles, no swords had been forged by the cruel armourer's ruthless skill." ~ Albius Tibullus 1.3.35-48
    >
    > AUC 256 / 497 BCE: Origin of Saturnalia
    >
    > "During the consulship of A. Sempronius and M. Minucius an altar was dedicated to Saturn and the festival of the Saturnalia instituted." ~ Titus Livius 2.21
    >
    > AUC 536 / 217 BCE: Origin of the lecisternium of Saturnus and the convivium
    >
    > "A decree was passed that to avert the evils which portents forebode, sacrifices should be offered, the victims to be both full-grown animals and sucklings, and also that special intercessions should be made at all the shrines for three days. What other ceremonial was necessary was to be carried out in accordance with the instructions of the decemvirs after they had inspected the Sibylline Oracles and ascertained the will of the Gods. On their advice it was decreed that the first votive offering should be made to Jupiter in the shape of a golden thunderbolt weighing fifty pounds, gifts of silver to Juno and Minerva, and sacrifices of full-grown victims to Queen Juno on the Aventine and Juno Sospita at Lanuvium, whilst the matrons were to contribute according to their means and bear their gift to Queen Juno on the Aventine. A lectisternium was to be held, and even the freedwomen were to contribute what they could for a gift to the temple of Feronia. When these instructions had been carried out the decemvirs sacrificed full-grown victims in the forum at Ardea, and finally in the middle of December there was a sacrifice at the temple precinct of Saturn, a lectisternium was ordered, the senators prepared the couch, and a public banquet (convivium) held. For a day and a night the cry of the Saturnalia resounded through the City, and the people were ordered to make that day a festival and observe it as such forever." ~ Titus Livius 22.1.19
    >
    > Plutarch, Roman Questions 11: "Why do they sacrifice to Saturnus with the head uncovered?
    >
    > "Is it because Aeneas instituted the custom of covering the head, and the sacrifice to Saturnus dates from long before that time? Or is it that they cover the head before the heavenly deities, but they consider Saturnus a God whose realm is beneath the earth? Or is it that no part of Truth is covered or overshadowed, and the Romans consider Saturnus Father of Truth?"
    >
    > The first day of Saturnalia begins as a solemn religious occasion with a morning sacrifice followed later in the day with a sacramental meal. The sacrifice, possibly a pig, was performed in ritus Graecus (Festus-Paul. Lindsay p.274.29-32). Violets, storax, and costus were used as incense for Him. Senators and the Equites wore togae during the lectisternium and the sacrifice that followed, but laid these aside during the public convivium. In donning their special togae praetexta for Senators, and the red cloaks of those Equites given public horses, they displayed the echelons of Roman society. In putting aside their togae they removed the symbols of their rank, all Roman citizens joined together in equality as was assumed was their condition during the rule of Saturnus in the Golden Age. From the banquet tables they would then go throughout the City with shouts:
    >
    > IO TRIUMPHE! IO SATURNALIA!
    >
    >
    > AUC 822 / 69 CE: The Army of Vitellius at Narnia in Etruria, survivors of the Second Battle of Cremona, went over to the Flavians.
    >
    >
    > A thought for today comes to us from L. Annaeus Seneca, Epistle 19:
    >
    > "Apply this maxim of the wise: consider that it is more important who receives a thing, than what it is he receives."
    >
    Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72633 From: marcushoratius Date: 2009-12-17
    Subject: Re: Io Saturnalia!!!! Joyous Saturnalia to all!!!
    IO TRIUMPHE !
    IO SATURNALIA !
    IO TRIUMPHE !

    Happy, Healthy, and Joyous holidays to everyone here.

    A Happy Chanukah to our Jewish members. Tomorrow begins the Islamic New Year, may Allah, the Merciful God of articulate speach, bring you a happy and prosperous year to come. A very Joyous and Satisfying Saturnalia to everyone. A Merry Christmas to our Christian members. And best wishes to all for the New Year.

    Valete optime et vadete in pace Deorum

    M. Moravius Piscinus Horatianus
    Pontifex Maximus
    Magister Collegii Augurum
    Senator Consularius


    --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "rory12001" <rory12001@...> wrote:
    >
    > Salvete Quirites;
    > Io Saturnalia!
    > a wonderful joyous Saturnalia to everyone!!
    >
    > Oh Julia you had me laughing so, that was too funny for words, a perfect way to being our holiday
    >
    > Io Saturnalia Titus Aquila!
    > Io Saturnalia Scaeva!
    > Io Saturnalia Caeca Scholasticaque!!
    >
    > make merry, have wine and fun & lots of nonsense; remember the golden age of King Saturn when all was peace and plenty.
    > Io Saturnalia!!
    > Maior
    >
    > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Titus Flavius Aquila <titus.aquila@> wrote:
    > >
    > > Salvete Quirites,
    > >
    > > Io Saturnalia !
    > >
    > > A very happy and joyful Saturnalia to all of you. Enjoy this very special time of the year.
    > >
    > > It is the time to celebrate,  to give little gifts to friends and the beloved, to eat, to drink, and to be merry. The toga is not worn, instead we have unconventional clothing !Â
    > >
    > > We shout it out loud  Io Saturnalia ! Io Saturnalia ! Io Saturnalia !
    > >
    > > Valete bene
    > > Titus Flavius Aquila
    > >
    > >
    > >
    > >
    > > ________________________________
    > > Von: luciaiuliaaquila <dis_pensible@>
    > > An: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
    > > Gesendet: Donnerstag, den 17. Dezember 2009, 7:57:12 Uhr
    > > Betreff: [Nova-Roma] Io Saturnalia!!!! Joyous Saturnalia to all!!!
    > >
    > > Â
    > > Salvete omnes!
    > >
    > > Audite! Scitisne quantus numerus barbarorum satis est ut ipsi facem accendere possint?
    > > Decies centena milia- uno facem tenente, debent ceteri convenire atque conari ignem invenire!
    > >
    > > Listen! Do you know how many barbarians it takes to light a torch?
    > > One million - one to hold the torch, and the rest to get together and try to discover fire!
    > >
    > > Valete optime!
    > >
    > > Abeo!
    > >
    > > Julia~
    > >
    > >
    > >
    > >
    > > __________________________________________________
    > > Do You Yahoo!?
    > > Sie sind Spam leid? Yahoo! Mail verfügt über einen herausragenden Schutz gegen Massenmails.
    > > http://mail.yahoo.com
    > >
    >
    Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72634 From: marcushoratius Date: 2009-12-17
    Subject: Re: Saturnalia fun
    Salve Maior

    A Greek and a Roman were arguing for quite some time over the contributions of their nations to civilization. With growing frustration the Greek said, "We invented mathematics!"

    "Yes," said the Roman, "But we put it to practical use, building roads to unite the empire, aqueducts to bring fresh water to the cities, and many marvelous temples and buildings for our cities."

    Finally, in complete frustration, the Greek blurted out, "We invented sex!"

    "Yes, you did," said the Roman, "And we introduced it to women."

    Io Saturnalia !

    Piscinus



    --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "rory12001" <rory12001@...> wrote:
    >
    > Salve Scaeva;
    > absolutely! Hold on, I'm posting my first Saturnalia joke:
    >
    > 2 philosophers meet:
    >
    > 1st Philosopher: I'm Johannes Martin, a stoic, and you?
    >
    > 2nd Philosopher: Gaia Katz, Cynic
    >
    > 1st. Philosopher: Cynic? what made you a Cynic?
    >
    > 2nd Philosopher; Mr. Katz
    >
    > Bene, bene, it's my first attempt;-)
    >
    > King Saturn comes; it's the Golden Age
    > let's sing and play; may he never go away...
    >
    > Maior
    > in pacem Saturni
    >
    > >
    Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72635 From: Marcus Iulius Scaeva Date: 2009-12-17
    Subject: Re: Io Saturnalia!!!! Joyous Saturnalia to all!!!
    Salvete omnes,
     
    Io Saturnalia to all!
     
    As we celebrate this most festive time may the gods bless us all with good health, good fortune, sound wisdom.
     
    Io Saturnalia Maior!
     

    Valete,
     
    M. Iulius Scaeva
     

     


    From: rory12001 <rory12001@...>
    To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
    Sent: Thu, December 17, 2009 3:55:38 AM
    Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Io Saturnalia!!!! Joyous Saturnalia to all!!!

     

    Salvete Quirites;
    Io Saturnalia!
    a wonderful joyous Saturnalia to everyone!!

    Oh Julia you had me laughing so, that was too funny for words, a perfect way to being our holiday

    Io Saturnalia Titus Aquila!
    Io Saturnalia Scaeva!
    Io Saturnalia Caeca Scholasticaque! !

    make merry, have wine and fun & lots of nonsense; remember the golden age of King Saturn when all was peace and plenty.
    Io Saturnalia!!
    Maior

    --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com, Titus Flavius Aquila <titus.aquila@ ...> wrote:
    >
    > Salvete Quirites,
    >
    > Io Saturnalia !
    >
    > A very happy and joyful Saturnalia to all of you. Enjoy this very special time of the year.
    >
    > It is the time to celebrate,  to give little gifts to friends and the beloved, to eat, to drink, and to be merry. The toga is not worn, instead we have unconventional clothing !Â
    >
    > We shout it out loud  Io Saturnalia ! Io Saturnalia ! Io Saturnalia !
    >
    > Valete bene
    > Titus Flavius Aquila
    >
    >
    >
    >
    > ____________ _________ _________ __
    > Von: luciaiuliaaquila <dis_pensible@ ...>
    > An: Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com
    > Gesendet: Donnerstag, den 17. Dezember 2009, 7:57:12 Uhr
    > Betreff: [Nova-Roma] Io Saturnalia!! !! Joyous Saturnalia to all!!!
    >
    > Â
    > Salvete omnes!
    >
    > Audite! Scitisne quantus numerus barbarorum satis est ut ipsi facem accendere possint?
    > Decies centena milia- uno facem tenente, debent ceteri convenire atque conari ignem invenire!
    >
    > Listen! Do you know how many barbarians it takes to light a torch?
    > One million - one to hold the torch, and the rest to get together and try to discover fire!
    >
    > Valete optime!
    >
    > Abeo!
    >
    > Julia~
    >
    >
    >
    >
    > ____________ _________ _________ _________ _________ __
    > Do You Yahoo!?
    > Sie sind Spam leid? Yahoo! Mail verfügt über einen herausragenden Schutz gegen Massenmails.
    > http://mail. yahoo.com
    >

    Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72636 From: Titus Flavius Aquila Date: 2009-12-17
    Subject: AW: [Nova-Roma] Re: Io Saturnalia!!!! Joyous Saturnalia to all!!!
    Salve Maior,
     
    a wonderful joyful time to you too.
     
    Io Saturnalia Maior !
     
    vale bene
    Titus Flavius Aquila


    Von: Marcus Iulius Scaeva <johnnormancitron@...>
    An: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
    Gesendet: Donnerstag, den 17. Dezember 2009, 13:25:24 Uhr
    Betreff: Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: Io Saturnalia!!!! Joyous Saturnalia to all!!!

     

    Salvete omnes,
     
    Io Saturnalia to all!
     
    As we celebrate this most festive time may the gods bless us all with good health, good fortune, sound wisdom.
     
    Io Saturnalia Maior!
     

    Valete,
     
    M. Iulius Scaeva
     

     


    From: rory12001 <rory12001@yahoo. com>
    To: Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com
    Sent: Thu, December 17, 2009 3:55:38 AM
    Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Io Saturnalia!! !! Joyous Saturnalia to all!!!

     

    Salvete Quirites;
    Io Saturnalia!
    a wonderful joyous Saturnalia to everyone!!

    Oh Julia you had me laughing so, that was too funny for words, a perfect way to being our holiday

    Io Saturnalia Titus Aquila!
    Io Saturnalia Scaeva!
    Io Saturnalia Caeca Scholasticaque! !

    make merry, have wine and fun & lots of nonsense; remember the golden age of King Saturn when all was peace and plenty.
    Io Saturnalia!!
    Maior

    --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com, Titus Flavius Aquila <titus.aquila@ ...> wrote:
    >
    > Salvete Quirites,
    >
    > Io Saturnalia !
    >
    > A very happy and joyful Saturnalia to all of you. Enjoy this very special time of the year.
    >
    > It is the time to celebrate,  to give little gifts to friends and the beloved, to eat, to drink, and to be merry. The toga is not worn, instead we have unconventional clothing !Â
    >
    > We shout it out loud  Io Saturnalia ! Io Saturnalia ! Io Saturnalia !
    >
    > Valete bene
    > Titus Flavius Aquila
    >
    >
    >
    >
    > ____________ _________ _________ __
    > Von: luciaiuliaaquila <dis_pensible@ ...>
    > An: Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com
    > Gesendet: Donnerstag, den 17. Dezember 2009, 7:57:12 Uhr
    > Betreff: [Nova-Roma] Io Saturnalia!! !! Joyous Saturnalia to all!!!
    >
    > Â
    > Salvete omnes!
    >
    > Audite! Scitisne quantus numerus barbarorum satis est ut ipsi facem accendere possint?
    > Decies centena milia- uno facem tenente, debent ceteri convenire atque conari ignem invenire!
    >
    > Listen! Do you know how many barbarians it takes to light a torch?
    > One million - one to hold the torch, and the rest to get together and try to discover fire!
    >
    > Valete optime!
    >
    > Abeo!
    >
    > Julia~
    >
    >
    >
    >
    > ____________ _________ _________ _________ _________ __
    > Do You Yahoo!?
    > Sie sind Spam leid? Yahoo! Mail verfügt über einen herausragenden Schutz gegen Massenmails.
    > http://mail. yahoo.com
    >


    __________________________________________________
    Do You Yahoo!?
    Sie sind Spam leid? Yahoo! Mail verfügt über einen herausragenden Schutz gegen Massenmails.
    http://mail.yahoo.com
    Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72637 From: Lyn Dowling Date: 2009-12-17
    Subject: Re: Saturnalia fun
    Salve Horati,
     
    Very funny, a keeper.
     
    Io Saturnalia!
     
    L. Aemilia


    From: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com [mailto:Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of marcushoratius
    Sent: Thursday, December 17, 2009 7:23 AM
    To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
    Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Saturnalia f

     

    Salve Maior

    A Greek and a Roman were arguing for quite some time over the contributions of their nations to civilization. With growing frustration the Greek said, "We invented mathematics! "

    "Yes," said the Roman, "But we put it to practical use, building roads to unite the empire, aqueducts to bring fresh water to the cities, and many marvelous temples and buildings for our cities."

    Finally, in complete frustration, the Greek blurted out, "We invented sex!"

    "Yes, you did," said the Roman, "And we introduced it to women."

    Io Saturnalia !

    Piscinus

    --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com, "rory12001" <rory12001@. ..> wrote:
    >
    > Salve Scaeva;
    > absolutely! Hold on, I'm posting my first Saturnalia joke:
    >
    > 2 philosophers meet:
    >
    > 1st Philosopher: I'm Johannes Martin, a stoic, and you?
    >
    > 2nd Philosopher: Gaia Katz, Cynic
    >
    > 1st. Philosopher: Cynic? what made you a Cynic?
    >
    > 2nd Philosopher; Mr. Katz
    >
    > Bene, bene, it's my first attempt;-)
    >
    > King Saturn comes; it's the Golden Age
    > let's sing and play; may he never go away...
    >
    > Maior
    > in pacem Saturni
    >
    > >

    No virus found in this incoming message.
    Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
    Version: 9.0.716 / Virus Database: 270.14.111/2570 - Release Date: 12/17/09 03:30:00

    Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72638 From: marcus.lucretius Date: 2009-12-17
    Subject: Re: Roman Days 2010 June 5, 6
    Salve Amice et salvete Omnes

    We have much to learn about the details of the material culture from our friends in the legiones, especially clothes, footware, cookware. They have impressive scholarship AND experience. I'm very happy to see that they have found a new site for Roman Days.

    IO SATVRNALIA!





    --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "luciaiuliaaquila" <dis_pensible@...> wrote:
    >
    > Salve Agricola,
    >
    > I may be able to pull this off, sounds interesting.
    >
    > Gratias tibi ago amici,
    >
    > Bene vale in pace deorum,
    >
    > Julia
    >
    > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "marcus.lucretius" <marcus.lucretius@> wrote:
    > >
    > > Agricola Omnibus sal.
    > >
    > > Here is a gift from our friends and allies in Legio XX. They have a wiki set up for Roman Days at wikispaces: http://romandays.wikispaces.com/
    > >
    > > They have a new location and have just set the June dates.
    > >
    > > bene valete in cura deorum
    > >
    >
    Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72639 From: L. Livia Plauta Date: 2009-12-17
    Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] More Saturnalia fun: jocí Latíné
    Livia Scholasticae sal.

    These are much better than the jokes in the Assimil book! Plurimas gratias
    ago!

    Vale,
    Livia

    ----- Original Message -----
    From: "A. Tullia Scholastica" <fororom@.....>
    To: <Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com>
    Sent: Thursday, December 17, 2009 9:41 AM
    Subject: [Nova-Roma] More Saturnalia fun: jocí Latíné


    A. Tullia Scholastica quiritibus, sociis, peregrinisque bonae voluntatis
    S.P.D.

    Now that Caeca¹s fate is temporarily sealed, I can turn to lighter fare
    before heading on to the next paper, so here are a few jokes in Latin for
    the cognoscenti. Translations will be provided for those unfortunates who
    do not yet know Latin.

    ====

    Prima: Cur non reddidisti anulum quam tu invenisti?

    Secunda: Non putavi esse necesse.

    Prima: Quomodo?

    Secunda: In anulo scriptum est: Tuus in aeternum.

    [First woman: Why didn¹t you return the ring which you found?

    Second woman: I didn¹t think it was necessary.

    First woman: Why?

    Second woman: On the ring is the inscription [it is written] Yours for
    eternity].

    =====

    Civis: Aliquis, custos, mihi magnam alapam duxit.

    Custos publicus: Quis erat ille vir?

    Civis: Nescio; sed autem vestigia illius digitorum in meo vultu sunt
    impressa.

    [Citizen: Officer, someone gave me a hard slap.

    Police officer: Who was that guy?

    Citizen: I dunno, but the marks of his fingers are printed on my face].

    ========

    And especially for the season:

    Mulier: Quomodo tantum potare assuevisti?

    Vir: Propter res familiares.

    Mulier: Fortasse tuum matrimonium est infelix?

    Vir: Non. Sed habeo tres affines qui omnes caupones sunt.

    [Woman: How did you become accustomed to drink so much?

    Man: Because of family matters.

    Woman: Is your marriage unhappy, by any chance?

    Man: No, but I have three relatives all of whom are innkeepers/tavern
    owners.

    ---all from Auxilium Latinum of long ago, translated by yours truly.

    ======

    Fruimini! Enjoy!

    Valete.
    Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72640 From: iulius sabinus Date: 2009-12-17
    Subject: Re: Io Saturnalia!!!! Joyous Saturnalia to all!!!
    SALVETE!
     
    IO SATURNALIA!
     
    I wish to all of you, your families and friends, happy and joyful winter celebrations and festivities.
     
    May the next year bring all the best for us.
     
    IO SATURNALIA!
     
    VALETE,
    T. Iulius Sabinus

    "Every individual is the architect of his own fortune" - Appius Claudius


    --- On Thu, 12/17/09, marcushoratius <MHoratius@...> wrote:

    From: marcushoratius <MHoratius@...>
    Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Io Saturnalia!!!! Joyous Saturnalia to all!!!
    To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
    Date: Thursday, December 17, 2009, 2:15 PM

     
    IO TRIUMPHE !
    IO SATURNALIA !
    IO TRIUMPHE !

    Happy, Healthy, and Joyous holidays to everyone here.

    A Happy Chanukah to our Jewish members. Tomorrow begins the Islamic New Year, may Allah, the Merciful God of articulate speach, bring you a happy and prosperous year to come. A very Joyous and Satisfying Saturnalia to everyone. A Merry Christmas to our Christian members. And best wishes to all for the New Year.

    Valete optime et vadete in pace Deorum

    M. Moravius Piscinus Horatianus
    Pontifex Maximus
    Magister Collegii Augurum
    Senator Consularius

    --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com, "rory12001" <rory12001@. ..> wrote:
    >
    > Salvete Quirites;
    > Io Saturnalia!
    > a wonderful joyous Saturnalia to everyone!!
    >
    > Oh Julia you had me laughing so, that was too funny for words, a perfect way to being our holiday
    >
    > Io Saturnalia Titus Aquila!
    > Io Saturnalia Scaeva!
    > Io Saturnalia Caeca Scholasticaque! !
    >
    > make merry, have wine and fun & lots of nonsense; remember the golden age of King Saturn when all was peace and plenty.
    > Io Saturnalia!!
    > Maior
    >
    > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com, Titus Flavius Aquila <titus.aquila@ > wrote:
    > >
    > > Salvete Quirites,
    > >
    > > Io Saturnalia !
    > >
    > > A very happy and joyful Saturnalia to all of you. Enjoy this very special time of the year.
    > >
    > > It is the time to celebrate,  to give little gifts to friends and the beloved, to eat, to drink, and to be merry. The toga is not worn, instead we have unconventional clothing !Â
    > >
    > > We shout it out loud  Io Saturnalia ! Io Saturnalia ! Io Saturnalia !
    > >
    > > Valete bene
    > > Titus Flavius Aquila
    > >
    > >
    > >
    > >
    > > ____________ _________ _________ __
    > > Von: luciaiuliaaquila <dis_pensible@ >
    > > An: Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com
    > > Gesendet: Donnerstag, den 17. Dezember 2009, 7:57:12 Uhr
    > > Betreff: [Nova-Roma] Io Saturnalia!! !! Joyous Saturnalia to all!!!
    > >
    > > Â
    > > Salvete omnes!
    > >
    > > Audite! Scitisne quantus numerus barbarorum satis est ut ipsi facem accendere possint?
    > > Decies centena milia- uno facem tenente, debent ceteri convenire atque conari ignem invenire!
    > >
    > > Listen! Do you know how many barbarians it takes to light a torch?
    > > One million - one to hold the torch, and the rest to get together and try to discover fire!
    > >
    > > Valete optime!
    > >
    > > Abeo!
    > >
    > > Julia~
    > >
    > >
    > >
    > >
    > > ____________ _________ _________ _________ _________ __
    > > Do You Yahoo!?
    > > Sie sind Spam leid? Yahoo! Mail verfügt über einen herausragenden Schutz gegen Massenmails.
    > > http://mail. yahoo.com
    > >
    >


    Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72641 From: iulius sabinus Date: 2009-12-17
    Subject: Re: Saturnalia fun
    SALVE MARCE HORATI!
     
    That was really funny!
     
    VALE BENE,
    T. Iulius Sabinus

    "Every individual is the architect of his own fortune" - Appius Claudius


    --- On Thu, 12/17/09, marcushoratius <MHoratius@...> wrote:

    From: marcushoratius <MHoratius@...>
    Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Saturnalia fun
    To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
    Date: Thursday, December 17, 2009, 2:23 PM

     
    Salve Maior

    A Greek and a Roman were arguing for quite some time over the contributions of their nations to civilization. With growing frustration the Greek said, "We invented mathematics! "

    "Yes," said the Roman, "But we put it to practical use, building roads to unite the empire, aqueducts to bring fresh water to the cities, and many marvelous temples and buildings for our cities."

    Finally, in complete frustration, the Greek blurted out, "We invented sex!"

    "Yes, you did," said the Roman, "And we introduced it to women."

    Io Saturnalia !

    Piscinus

    --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com, "rory12001" <rory12001@. ..> wrote:
    >
    > Salve Scaeva;
    > absolutely! Hold on, I'm posting my first Saturnalia joke:
    >
    > 2 philosophers meet:
    >
    > 1st Philosopher: I'm Johannes Martin, a stoic, and you?
    >
    > 2nd Philosopher: Gaia Katz, Cynic
    >
    > 1st. Philosopher: Cynic? what made you a Cynic?
    >
    > 2nd Philosopher; Mr. Katz
    >
    > Bene, bene, it's my first attempt;-)
    >
    > King Saturn comes; it's the Golden Age
    > let's sing and play; may he never go away...
    >
    > Maior
    > in pacem Saturni
    >
    > >


    Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72642 From: Sabinus Date: 2009-12-17
    Subject: Re: More Saturnalia fun: jocí Latíné
    SALVE!

    Thank you very much for your fine work translating the texts in Latin.

    VALE BENE,
    T. Iulius Sabinus

    --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "A. Tullia Scholastica" <fororom@...> wrote:
    >
    > A. Tullia Scholastica quiritibus, sociis, peregrinisque bonae voluntatis
    > S.P.D.
    >
    > Now that Caeca¹s fate is temporarily sealed, I can turn to lighter fare
    > before heading on to the next paper, so here are a few jokes in Latin for
    > the cognoscenti. Translations will be provided for those unfortunates who
    > do not yet know Latin.
    >
    > ====
    >
    > Prima: Cur non reddidisti anulum quam tu invenisti?
    >
    > Secunda: Non putavi esse necesse.
    >
    > Prima: Quomodo?
    >
    > Secunda: In anulo scriptum est: Tuus in aeternum.
    >
    > [First woman: Why didn¹t you return the ring which you found?
    >
    > Second woman: I didn¹t think it was necessary.
    >
    > First woman: Why?
    >
    > Second woman: On the ring is the inscription [it is written] Yours for
    > eternity].
    >
    > =====
    >
    > Civis: Aliquis, custos, mihi magnam alapam duxit.
    >
    > Custos publicus: Quis erat ille vir?
    >
    > Civis: Nescio; sed autem vestigia illius digitorum in meo vultu sunt
    > impressa.
    >
    > [Citizen: Officer, someone gave me a hard slap.
    >
    > Police officer: Who was that guy?
    >
    > Citizen: I dunno, but the marks of his fingers are printed on my face].
    >
    > ========
    >
    > And especially for the season:
    >
    > Mulier: Quomodo tantum potare assuevisti?
    >
    > Vir: Propter res familiares.
    >
    > Mulier: Fortasse tuum matrimonium est infelix?
    >
    > Vir: Non. Sed habeo tres affines qui omnes caupones sunt.
    >
    > [Woman: How did you become accustomed to drink so much?
    >
    > Man: Because of family matters.
    >
    > Woman: Is your marriage unhappy, by any chance?
    >
    > Man: No, but I have three relatives all of whom are innkeepers/tavern
    > owners.
    >
    > ---all from Auxilium Latinum of long ago, translated by yours truly.
    >
    > ======
    >
    > Fruimini! Enjoy!
    >
    > Valete.
    >
    Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72643 From: rory12001 Date: 2009-12-17
    Subject: Re: Saturnalia fun
    That was a good one;-) hehe, I loved it. Io Saturnalia Piscine care amice et Sabine amice!
    Io Saturnalia!
    Maior


    > SALVE MARCE HORATI!
    > Â
    > That was really funny!
    > Â
    > VALE BENE,
    > T. Iulius Sabinus
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >
    > "Every individual is the architect of his own fortune" - Appius Claudius
    >
    > --- On Thu, 12/17/09, marcushoratius <MHoratius@...> wrote:
    >
    >
    > From: marcushoratius <MHoratius@...>
    > Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Saturnalia fun
    > To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
    > Date: Thursday, December 17, 2009, 2:23 PM
    >
    >
    > Â
    >
    >
    >
    > Salve Maior
    >
    > A Greek and a Roman were arguing for quite some time over the contributions of their nations to civilization. With growing frustration the Greek said, "We invented mathematics! "
    >
    > "Yes," said the Roman, "But we put it to practical use, building roads to unite the empire, aqueducts to bring fresh water to the cities, and many marvelous temples and buildings for our cities."
    >
    > Finally, in complete frustration, the Greek blurted out, "We invented sex!"
    >
    > "Yes, you did," said the Roman, "And we introduced it to women."
    >
    > Io Saturnalia !
    >
    > Piscinus
    >
    > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com, "rory12001" <rory12001@ ..> wrote:
    > >
    > > Salve Scaeva;
    > > absolutely! Hold on, I'm posting my first Saturnalia joke:
    > >
    > > 2 philosophers meet:
    > >
    > > 1st Philosopher: I'm Johannes Martin, a stoic, and you?
    > >
    > > 2nd Philosopher: Gaia Katz, Cynic
    > >
    > > 1st. Philosopher: Cynic? what made you a Cynic?
    > >
    > > 2nd Philosopher; Mr. Katz
    > >
    > > Bene, bene, it's my first attempt;-)
    > >
    > > King Saturn comes; it's the Golden Age
    > > let's sing and play; may he never go away...
    > >
    > > Maior
    > > in pacem Saturni
    > >
    > > >
    >
    Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72644 From: C.Maria Caeca Date: 2009-12-17
    Subject: a bit of Saturnalia fun ...
    Salvete omnes,

    It is my understanding that, among the other things done during Saturnalia,
    masters served their slaves, at least for part of a day. If this is so ...I
    was wondering ...wouldn't it, in light of the "article" I posted yesterday,
    be appropriate for a very insignificant citizen to have a "Consul do" list?
    If so ...well ...I've got a list! Of course, the commute might be a problem
    ...but I *could* manage to keep them quite busy (wicked grin).

    Io Saturnalia!

    C. Maria Caeca, counting the number of her really *good* hiding places!
    Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72645 From: C.Maria Caeca Date: 2009-12-17
    Subject: Re: Saturnalia fun
    Caeca Piscano omnibusque sal,
     
    Oh, my!  This get my vote as funniest so far, and I know just *who* to pass it along to!
     
    C. Maria Caeca
    Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72646 From: marcus.lucretius Date: 2009-12-17
    Subject: Re: Io Saturnalia!!!! Joyous Saturnalia to all!!!
    Agricola Omnibus sal.

    A friend sent this to me.

    ====

    Saturnalia

    by Selena Fox

    Selena first publicly shared this poem on Solstice night 1994 during Circle's public Winter Solstice Celebration in Madison, Wisconsin.




    It is the middle of December.
    The nights are longer, the weather is colder, winter comes.

    Celebration is at hand.
    Renewing bonds of friendship.
    Visiting with family and friends.
    Exchanging gifts with loved ones.
    Candles, Dolls, Cookies, Sweets, Holly, Wreaths of Green.
    Surprises.

    Courts close. Battles stop.
    Time off from school and work.
    Holiday Break.

    Singing, Dancing, Games, Merry-Making.
    Food ... Lots of Food and Drink.
    Great Feasts and Parties.

    To celebrate the Sun, the Land, the Ancient Ones, the great Circle of Nature.
    To welcome in the Winter and the New Year.
    To bring forth renewal, peace, and joy.

    Solstice Present .... Solstice Past.
    This is the legacy of Saturnalia,
    weeklong Pagan Winter Solstice Festival of Ancient Rome.

    Saturnalia, your spirit and these traditions live on
    in the world today
    in Christmas feasts and New Year's parties,
    in our Winter Solstice celebration tonight.

    Bless our connection with the ancients.
    Bless our connection with each other.
    Bless our connection with future generations.

    We rejoice.
    Io, Saturnalia!
    Io, Saturnalia!
    Io, Saturnalia!

    ====

    source: http://www.circlesanctuary.org/pholidays/SaturnaliaPoem.html






    --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, iulius sabinus <iulius_sabinus@...> wrote:
    >
    > SALVETE!
    >  
    > IO SATURNALIA!
    >  
    > I wish to all of you, your families and friends, happy and joyful winter celebrations and festivities.
    >  
    > May the next year bring all the best for us.
    >  
    > IO SATURNALIA!
    >  
    > VALETE,
    > T. Iulius Sabinus
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >
    > "Every individual is the architect of his own fortune" - Appius Claudius
    >
    > --- On Thu, 12/17/09, marcushoratius <MHoratius@...> wrote:
    >
    >
    > From: marcushoratius <MHoratius@...>
    > Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Io Saturnalia!!!! Joyous Saturnalia to all!!!
    > To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
    > Date: Thursday, December 17, 2009, 2:15 PM
    >
    >
    >  
    >
    >
    >
    > IO TRIUMPHE !
    > IO SATURNALIA !
    > IO TRIUMPHE !
    >
    > Happy, Healthy, and Joyous holidays to everyone here.
    >
    > A Happy Chanukah to our Jewish members. Tomorrow begins the Islamic New Year, may Allah, the Merciful God of articulate speach, bring you a happy and prosperous year to come. A very Joyous and Satisfying Saturnalia to everyone. A Merry Christmas to our Christian members. And best wishes to all for the New Year.
    >
    > Valete optime et vadete in pace Deorum
    >
    > M. Moravius Piscinus Horatianus
    > Pontifex Maximus
    > Magister Collegii Augurum
    > Senator Consularius
    >
    > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com, "rory12001" <rory12001@ ..> wrote:
    > >
    > > Salvete Quirites;
    > > Io Saturnalia!
    > > a wonderful joyous Saturnalia to everyone!!
    > >
    > > Oh Julia you had me laughing so, that was too funny for words, a perfect way to being our holiday
    > >
    > > Io Saturnalia Titus Aquila!
    > > Io Saturnalia Scaeva!
    > > Io Saturnalia Caeca Scholasticaque! !
    > >
    > > make merry, have wine and fun & lots of nonsense; remember the golden age of King Saturn when all was peace and plenty.
    > > Io Saturnalia!!
    > > Maior
    > >
    > > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com, Titus Flavius Aquila <titus.aquila@ > wrote:
    > > >
    > > > Salvete Quirites,
    > > >
    > > > Io Saturnalia !
    > > >
    > > > A very happy and joyful Saturnalia to all of you. Enjoy this very special time of the year.
    > > >
    > > > It is the time to celebrate,  to give little gifts to friends and the beloved, to eat, to drink, and to be merry. The toga is not worn, instead we have unconventional clothing !Â
    > > >
    > > > We shout it out loud  Io Saturnalia ! Io Saturnalia ! Io Saturnalia !
    > > >
    > > > Valete bene
    > > > Titus Flavius Aquila
    > > >
    > > >
    > > >
    > > >
    > > > ____________ _________ _________ __
    > > > Von: luciaiuliaaquila <dis_pensible@ >
    > > > An: Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com
    > > > Gesendet: Donnerstag, den 17. Dezember 2009, 7:57:12 Uhr
    > > > Betreff: [Nova-Roma] Io Saturnalia!! !! Joyous Saturnalia to all!!!
    > > >
    > > > Â
    > > > Salvete omnes!
    > > >
    > > > Audite! Scitisne quantus numerus barbarorum satis est ut ipsi facem accendere possint?
    > > > Decies centena milia- uno facem tenente, debent ceteri convenire atque conari ignem invenire!
    > > >
    > > > Listen! Do you know how many barbarians it takes to light a torch?
    > > > One million - one to hold the torch, and the rest to get together and try to discover fire!
    > > >
    > > > Valete optime!
    > > >
    > > > Abeo!
    > > >
    > > > Julia~
    > > >
    > > >
    > > >
    > > >
    > > > ____________ _________ _________ _________ _________ __
    > > > Do You Yahoo!?
    > > > Sie sind Spam leid? Yahoo! Mail verfügt über einen herausragenden Schutz gegen Massenmails.
    > > > http://mail. yahoo.com
    > > >
    > >
    >
    Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72647 From: C.Maria Caeca Date: 2009-12-17
    Subject: Re: Io Saturnalia!!!! Joyous Saturnalia to all!!!
    Caeca Agricol(a?) sal,
     
    Oh, my!  I haven't thought of Selena or Circle Sanctuary for years and years!  Thank you for bringing back fond memories of lovely people, and a place to which I owe much!
     
    C. Maria Caeca
    Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72648 From: csentiusleoninus Date: 2009-12-17
    Subject: Re: new project
    Leoninus Scholasticae Caecae omnibusque S.P.D

    > > ATS: LOL! I sure know what BID, TID, QID, HS, HC, OD, OS, per os, stat,
    > > and a bunch of other med school jargon means...and where these words and
    > > phrases came from, plus what RX *really* means! Stat is from statim...

    Scholastica, amica mea, you may be able to help me. My latest prescription for my hypertension meds says:-

    1 mane (which I understand) followed by m.d.u. Any idea what the m.d.u means?

    Valete optime!
    Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72649 From: Cn. Cornelius Lentulus Date: 2009-12-17
    Subject: IO SATURNALIA!!! (Saturnalia in Pannonia)
    IO SATURNALIA!
    IO SATURNALIA!!
    IO SATURNALIA!!!

    The Saturnalia is started!

    I wish a joyful Saturnalia to all Nova Romans! Let's celebrate Saturnalia with friendship, love and joy!

    There will be a Nova Roman Saturnalia Party and sacrifice at Saturday, 19th, Saturn's Day: you will be all with us in spirit, and all those who can come, are our guests.

    I will report you about the Saturnalia Party!


    Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus,
    P O N T I F E X
    Legatus Pro Praetore Provinciae Pannoniae


    Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72650 From: Cato Date: 2009-12-17
    Subject: Re: Io Saturnalia!!!! Joyous Saturnalia to all!!!
    Cato omnibus in foro SPD

    Io Saturnalia!

    May all of our citizens and peregrines enjoy a wonderful and happy season, in whichever celebration they take part.

    Io Saturnalia!

    Optime valete,

    Cato
    Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72651 From: Cn. Cornelius Lentulus Date: 2009-12-17
    Subject: Your Saturnalia Prayer
    Cn. Lentulus pontifex amicis et Quiritibus sal.

    Io Saturnalia!

    This is a Saturnalia daily ritual for you, citizens. A ritual to Father Saturnus, including the name of Concordia. It is written for every Nova Roman citizen: you can use this prayer at your lararium during the following days of Saturnalia.

    I wish as many of you as possible use this in your regular daily lararium prayers during the days of Saturnalia.

    After each Latin section there is the English translation. Please feel free to correct publicly my English, and then we will find together solutions to have a religious and sacral Roman English text.

    Roman prayers were generally rhythmized, composed as verse of the rhythm of thoughts, repetitions, alliterations, number of words and accents.

    This is how my prayers are composed, and I tried to make the English one so that it recall the Latin verses.

    To use this prayer, you might consult the following articles about rites on our website:

    http://novaroma. org/nr/Guide_ to_Sacrifice
    http://novaroma. org/nr/Adoratio
    http://novaroma. org/nr/Daily_ Rituals_( Nova_Roma)


    YOUR TRANSLATED SATURNALIA DAILY RITUAL

    (After your regular rites at your lararium, say...)

    PRAEFATIO - PREFACE TO THE PRAYER

    "Saturne, pater sanctissime,
    te hoc ture commovendo
    bonas preces precor,
    uti sis volens propitius
    Novis Romanis, amicis meis,
    mihi, domo, familiae!
    "

    Saturnus, our most sacred father,
    by offering you this incense
    I pray good prayers so
    that you be benevolent and propitious
    to the Nova Romans, to my friends,
    to me, to my household and to my family.

    (Incense is placed in the focus of the altar.)

    "Concordia,
    te hoc ture commovendo
    bonas preces precor,
    uti sis volens propitia
    Novis Romanis, amicis meis,
    mihi, domo, familiae!!"


    Concordia,
    by offering you this incense
    I pray good prayers so
    that you be benevolent and propitious
    to the Nova Romans, to my friends,
    to me, to my household and to my family.

    (Incense is placed in the focus of the altar.)

    "Saturne, pater sanctissime,
    uti te ture commovendo
    bonas preces precatus sum,
    eiusdem rei ergo
    macte vino inferio esto!"


    Saturnus, our most sacred father,
    as by offering incense
    I have prayed good prayers,
    for the very same reason
    be thou blessed by this wine.

    (Libation of wine is made.)

    "Concordia,
    uti te ture commovendo
    bonas preces precatus sum,
    eiusdem rei ergo
    macte vino inferio esto!"


    Concordia,
    as by offering incense
    I have prayed good prayers,
    for the very same reason
    be thou blessed by this wine.

    (Libation of wine is made.)

    PRECATIO - THE PRAYER

    "Saturne, pater sanctissime atque amatissime,
    hoc die Saturnalium
    te precor, quaesoque:
    uti pacem concordiamque
    societati Novae Romae
    familiaeque meae tribuas;
    utique sis volens propitius
    Novis Romanis, amicis meis,
    mihi, domo, familiae!"

    Saturnus, our most sacred and beloved father,
    on this day of the Saturnalia
    I pray and ask you so
    that you give peace and concord
    to the society of Nova Roma
    and to my own family;
    and that you be benevolent and propitious
    to the Nova Romans, to my friends,
    to me, to my household and to my family.

    SACRIFICIUM - THE SACRIFICE

    "Cuius rei ergo macte
    hoc vino libando,
    hoc ture ommovendo
    esto fito volens propitius
    Novis Romanis, amicis meis,
    mihi, domo, familiae!"

    For this reason, thou blessed
    by offering this wine,
    by offering this incense
    be benevolent and propitious
    to the Nova Romans, to my friends,
    to me, to my household and to my family.

    (Libation is made and incense is sacrificed.)

    PIACULUM - THE EXPIATION OF MISTAKES DURING THE RITUAL

    "Iane,
    Saturne, pater sanctissime,
    Concordia,
    Lares, Manes, Penates,
    Iuppiter, Iuno, Minerva,
    Omnes Di Immortales quocumque nomine:
    si quidquam vobis in hac caerimonia displiceat,
    hoc vino inferio
    veniam peto
    et vitium meum expio."

    Ianus,
    Saturnus, our most sacred father,
    Concordia,
    Lares, Manes, Penates,
    Iuppiter, Iuno, Minerva,
    All Gods Immortal, by whichever name:
    if something in this cermony was unpleasant to you,
    by this wine
    I do apoligize
    and expiate my mistake.

    (Libation of wine is made.)

    I wish my fellow citizens a very happy and sacred Saturnalia, celebrations of humanity, friendship and peace. May Father Saturnus bless you all, together with Goddess Concordia who has a special significance and importance in these sacred days. This is a time to show your fellow citizens that you love and respect them, you want peace, friendship and concord. This is still the Year of the Tenth Anniversary and Sacred Year of Concordia. Honour the Goddess and Her values in this Saturnalia and remember of the ten years of our republic.

    HAPPY SATURNALIA!! !!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!


    CN. CORNELIVS LENTVLVS
    PONTIFEX


    Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72652 From: Marcus Iulius Scaeva Date: 2009-12-17
    Subject: Re: Io Saturnalia!!!! Joyous Saturnalia to all!!!
    Io Saturnalia Cato!
     
    Vale,
     
    M. Iulius Scaeva
     

     



    From: Cato <catoinnyc@...>
    To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
    Sent: Thu, December 17, 2009 5:50:29 PM
    Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Io Saturnalia!!!! Joyous Saturnalia to all!!!

     

    Cato omnibus in foro SPD

    Io Saturnalia!

    May all of our citizens and peregrines enjoy a wonderful and happy season, in whichever celebration they take part.

    Io Saturnalia!

    Optime valete,

    Cato

    Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72653 From: Cato Date: 2009-12-17
    Subject: Re: Io Saturnalia!!!! Joyous Saturnalia to all!!!
    Cato Iulio Scaevae sal.

    Gratias tibi ago :)

    optime vale,

    Cato

    --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Marcus Iulius Scaeva <johnnormancitron@...> wrote:
    >
    > Io Saturnalia Cato!
    >
    > Vale,
    >
    > M. Iulius Scaeva
    >  
    >  
    >
    >
    >
    >
    > ________________________________
    > From: Cato <catoinnyc@...>
    > To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
    > Sent: Thu, December 17, 2009 5:50:29 PM
    > Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Io Saturnalia!!!! Joyous Saturnalia to all!!!
    >
    >  
    > Cato omnibus in foro SPD
    >
    > Io Saturnalia!
    >
    > May all of our citizens and peregrines enjoy a wonderful and happy season, in whichever celebration they take part.
    >
    > Io Saturnalia!
    >
    > Optime valete,
    >
    > Cato
    >
    Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72654 From: John Citron Date: 2009-12-17
    Subject: Saturnalia Jokes
    Salvete omnes,

    See if you like this:

    For Saturnalia I gave my son a sling and some stones. He gave me a
    tunic with a bull's-eye on the back!

    Valete,

    M. Iulius Scaeva
    Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72655 From: L. Livia Plauta Date: 2009-12-17
    Subject: Saturnalia gifts
    L. Livia Plauta omnibus S.P.D.

    I have posted on Facebook the photos of some of the roman object replicas I
    produce. I know it's a bit late to buy them for Saturnalia, but here they
    are:

    http://www.facebook.com/album.php?aid=128771&id=828009843&l=67802510dc

    Optime valete,
    Livia
    Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72656 From: gaius_pompeius_marcellus Date: 2009-12-17
    Subject: Io Saturnalia
    Salve,
    Wishing all my fellow citizens good fortune, good food, and good drink this Satunalia. May the first cup you raise be in phraise of the Gods and Goddesses, protectors of our blessed republic.
    Vale,
    Gaius Pompeius Marcellus
    Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72657 From: mcorvvs Date: 2009-12-18
    Subject: Re: Io Saturnalia!!!! Joyous Saturnalia to all!!!
    Salvete omnes! Io Saturnalia!

    Best wishes to People of Nova Roma, to your families, relatives and friends!

    Salvete!

    CORVVS

    --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "luciaiuliaaquila" <dis_pensible@...> wrote:
    >
    > Salvete omnes!
    >
    > Audite! Scitisne quantus numerus barbarorum satis est ut ipsi facem accendere possint?
    > Decies centena milia- uno facem tenente, debent ceteri convenire atque conari ignem invenire!
    >
    > Listen! Do you know how many barbarians it takes to light a torch?
    > One million - one to hold the torch, and the rest to get together and try to discover fire!
    >
    > Valete optime!
    >
    > Abeo!
    >
    > Julia~
    >
    Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72658 From: marcushoratius Date: 2009-12-18
    Subject: a. d. XV Kalendas Ianuarias: Saturnalia, Eponia, Trebbia
    M. Moravius Piscinus Horatianus cultoribus Deorum, Quiritibus et omnibus salutem plurimam dicit: Io Saturnalia! Io Triumphe!

    Hodie est ante diem XV Kalendas Ianuaras; haec dies comitialis est: Saturnalia; Eponae; Ventorum conmutationem significat.

    New Moon

    The conjunction of the sun and moon just two days ago would signal the modern new moon. But it is the first visible sliver of the moon that the Romans recognized as the Kalends, and it is also with the first sight of the moon after the conjunction that the Islamic New Year begins tonight at sunset. It is in this period then that "land must be manured more particularly while the moon is in conjunction, or else at the first quarter. Take care to geld your boars, bulls, rams, and kids, while the moon is on the wane. Put eggs under the hen at a new moon. . . . Where the soil is humid, put in seed at the moon's conjunction, and during the four days about that period (Pliny, H. N. 18.75)." Gardening by the lunar cycles is still practiced today in the same manner that Columella, Cato, and Pliny advised.


    SATURNALIA

    "It is the month of December, and yet the City is at this very moment in a sweat. License is given to the general merrymaking. Everything resounds with mighty preparations, - as if the Saturnalia differed at all from the usual business day! So true it is that the difference is nil, that I regard as correct the remark of the man who said: 'Once December was a month; now it is a year.'" ~ L. Annaeus Seneca, Epistle 1.1

    The second day of Saturnalia began with an early morning bath (Tertullian, Apol. 42). Then came the family's sacrifice of a piglet. Generally such a sacrifice would indicate that it was intended for the family's Lares.

    Gather, while 'tis fine,
    Your wood; tomorrow shall be gay
    With smoking pig and streaming wine,
    And lord and slave keep holyday.
    ~ Q. Horatius Flaccus, Carmina 3.17.13-16

    The family then gathered, along with their household servants in a shared meal, one shared as well with the Lares. It was during this meal that the family members served their servants in a reversal of roles (Macrobius, Saturnalia 1.7.37).

    "The first inhabitants of Italy were the Aborigines, whose king, Saturn, is said to have been a man of such extraordinary justice, that no one was a slave in his reign, or had any private property, but all things were common to all, and undivided, as one estate for the use of every one; in memory of which way of life, it has been ordered that at the Saturnalia slaves should everywhere sit down with their masters at the entertainments, the rank of all being made equal. Italy was accordingly called, from the name of that king, Saturnia; and the hill on which he dwelt Saturnius, on which now stands the Capitol, as if Saturn had been dislodged from his seat by Jupiter." ~ M. Iunianus Iustinus, history 43.1

    Later in the day, and into the night, Romans then went to one another's homes for dinner, games, exchanges of gifts, and the general merriment of the season. The popular gifts were writing materials so that friends would be able to keep in touch, and the red candles called cerei that symbolized the return of the sun following the winter solstice. Days before the festival began, merchants sold sigillaria as gifts for family and friends to exchange. These were images made of paste or earthenware. A family used sigillaria as votives to make "a piaculum to Dis Pater and Saturnus for themselves and theirs (Macrobius, Saturnalia 1.10; 11.49)." In some of the earliest deposits at Rome, in the favisse on Mount Saturno, later called the Capitoline Hill, are found bronze figurines of humans. These are sometimes misinterpreted to represent deities. Similar deposits are found among the Sabines, where animals as well as people are represented. They can be compared to the drawings in the Val Camonica dating from the Bronze Age and Early Iron Age where figures represent worshippers rather than deities. They may also compare with votives found at shrines known for their healing properties. Giving these out as gifts signified a blessing as the sigillarium would be deposited in offering to Saturnus, to Dis Pater, to Janus, and probably to other deities as well. Associated with Saturnus is the fig tree (Plinius, H. N. 15.77), from which wood images of the terrestrial deities were carved.


    EPONA

    A sacrifice for Epona is mentioned in one fasti for today. A Goddess of horses and horsemen, She is the only Celtic Goddess to have entered in the religious calendar of Rome, but one of many to be worshipped by Romans in other parts of the Empire.Perhaps another distinction was how She merited a mythin the whimsical stories by some unknown author:

    "Fulvius Stellus hated women and used to consort with a mare and in due time the mare gave birth to a beautiful girl and they named her Epona. She is the Goddess that is concerned with the protection of horses. So Agesilaus in the third book of his Italian History." ~ Pseudo-Plutarch, Paralllela Minora 29


    AUC 535 / 218 BCE: Battle of Trebbia

    "After sending Mago with his 1000 infantry and 1000 cavalry to take up his position, Hannibal gave orders for the Numidian cavalry to cross the Trebia in the early dawn and ride up to the gates of the Roman camp; then they were to discharge their missiles on the outposts and so goad the enemy on to battle. When the fighting had once started they were gradually to give ground and draw their pursuers to their own side of the river. These were the instructions to the Numidians; the other commanders, both infantry and cavalry, were ordered to see that all their men had breakfast, after which they were to wait for the signal, the men fully armed, the horses saddled and ready. Eager for battle, and having already made up his mind to fight, Sempronius (Longus) led out the whole of his cavalry to meet the Numidian attack, for it was in his cavalry that he placed most confidence; these were followed by 6000 infantry and at last the whole of his force marched on to the field. It happened to be the season of winter, a snowstorm was raging, and the district, situated between the Alps and the Apennines, was rendered especially cold by the vicinity of rivers and marshes. To make matters worse, men and horses alike had been hurriedly sent forward, without any food, without any protection against the cold, so they had no heat in them and the chilling blasts from the river made the cold still more severe as they approached it in their pursuit of the Numidians. But when they entered the water which had been swollen by the night's rain and was then breast high, their limbs became stiff with cold, and when they emerged on the other side they had hardly strength to hold their weapons; they began to grow faint from fatigue and as the day wore on, from hunger.

    "Hannibal's men, meanwhile, had made fires in front of their tents, oil had been distributed amongst the maniples for them to make their joints and limbs supple and they had time for an ample repast. When it was announced that the enemy had crossed the river they took their arms, feeling alert and active in mind and body, and marched to battle. The Balearic and light-armed infantry were posted in front of the standards; they numbered about 8000; behind them the heavy-armed infantry, the mainstay and backbone of the army; on the flanks Hannibal distributed the cavalry, and outside them, again, the elephants. When the consul saw his cavalry, who had lost their order in the pursuit, suddenly meeting with an unsuspected resistance from the Numidians, he recalled them by signal and received them within his infantry. There were 18,000 Romans, 20,000 Latin allies, and an auxiliary force of Cenomani, the only Gallic tribe which had remained faithful. These were the forces engaged. The Balearics and light infantry opened the battle, but on being met by the heavier legions they were rapidly withdrawn to the wings, an evolution which at once threw the Roman horse into difficulties, for the 4000 wearied troopers had been unable to offer an effective resistance to 10,000 who were fresh and vigorous, and now in addition they were overwhelmed by what seemed a cloud of missiles from the light infantry. Moreover, the elephants, towering aloft at the ends of the line, terrified the horses not only by their appearance but by their unaccustomed smell, and created widespread panic. The infantry battle, as far as the Romans were concerned, was maintained more by courage than by physical strength, for the Carthaginians, who had shortly before been getting themselves into trim, brought their powers fresh and unimpaired into action, whilst the Romans were fatigued and hungry and stiff with cold. Still, their courage would have kept them up had it been only infantry that they were fighting against. But the light infantry, after repulsing the cavalry, were hurling their missiles on the flanks of the legions; the elephants had now come up against the centre of the Roman line, and Mago and his Numidians, as soon as it had passed their ambuscade, rose up in the rear and created a terrible disorder and panic. Yet in spite of all the dangers which surrounded them, the ranks stood firm and immovable for some time, even, contrary to all expectation, against the elephants. Some skirmishers who had been placed where they could attack these animals flung darts at them and drove them off, and rushed after them, stabbing them under their tails, where the skin is soft and easily penetrated.

    "Maddened with pain and terror, they were beginning to rush wildly on their own men, when Hannibal ordered them to be driven away to the left wing against the auxiliary Gauls on the Roman right. There they instantly produced unmistakable panic and flight, and the Romans had fresh cause for .alarm when they saw their auxiliaries routed. They now stood fighting in a square, and about 10,000 of them, unable to escape in any other direction, forced their way through the centre of the African troops and the auxiliary Gauls who supported them and inflicted an immense loss on the enemy. They were prevented by the river from returning to their camp, and the rain made it impossible for them to judge where they could best go to the assistance of their comrades, so they marched away straight to Placentia. Then desperate attempts to escape were made on all sides; some who made for the river were swept away by the current or caught by the enemy while hesitating to cross; others, scattered over the fields in flight, followed the track of the main retreat and sought Placentia; others, fearing the enemy more than the river, crossed it and reached their camp. The driving sleet and the intolerable cold caused the death of many men and baggage animals, and nearly all the elephants perished. The Carthaginians stopped their pursuit at the banks of the Trebia and returned to their camp so benumbed with cold that they hardly felt any joy in their victory." ~ Titus Livius 21.54-56


    AUC 822 / 69 CE: Death of Titus Sabinus

    Titus Flavius Sabinus, the brother of Vespasianus, had been holding the Capitoline Hill against Vitellius. The Capitolium itself was burned to the ground; Sabinus was captured and executed.


    Today's thought is from Epicurus, Vatican Sayings 52:

    "Friendship dances around the world bidding us all to awaken to the recognition of happiness."
    Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72659 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2009-12-18
    Subject: Re: new project
    Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: new project

     
     A. Tullia Scholastica C. Sentio Leonino C. Mariae Caecae optimis suís quiritibus, sociis, peregrinisque bonae voluntatis S.P.D.
       

    Leoninus Scholasticae Caecae omnibusque S.P.D

    > >     ATS:   LOL!  I sure know what BID, TID, QID, HS, HC, OD, OS, per os, stat,
    > > and a bunch of other med school jargon means...and where these words and
    > > phrases came from, plus what RX *really* means!  Stat is from statim...

    Scholastica, amica mea, you may be able to help me.   My latest prescription for my hypertension meds says:-

    1 mane (which I understand) followed by m.d.u.   Any idea what the m.d.u means?

        ATS2:  Infeliciter, numquam haec vidi.  Medio die usque?  Ubique?  Ubinam?  Unciatim?  Usu?  Marsuppiis dictum/dicatum unciatim?  ;-)  Fortasse est proprium patriae tuae vel illius pharmacopolis, sed fortasse Po auxilium ferat; aegrotantibus assidet.   Pauca verba litterá u- initium faciunt, ut paene sine dubio bene scis.   

    Valete optime!

    Vale et valete optime!  

     
       

    Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72660 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2009-12-18
    Subject: Re: More Saturnalia fun: jocí Latíné
    Re: [Nova-Roma] More Saturnalia fun:  jocí  Latíné

     
     A. Tullia Scholastica L. Liviae Plautae T. Julio Sabino quiritibus, sociis, peregrinisque bonae voluntatis S.P.D.
       

    Livia Scholasticae sal.

    These are much better than the jokes in the Assimil book!

        Assimil is not supposed to be a joke book, now is it?  ;-)  

    Plurimas gratias ago!

        ATS2:  Plurimas gratias tibi!  Sabine, these were not difficult to translate, at least not once one got past the idiom alapam ducere, which we learnt in Assimil, though I believe under a related term, colaphum ducere, which is to punch someone rather than to slap someone.  

        Here’s another one from a different Auxilium, also translated by yours truly:  

            Judex:  Sed quidam vir, qui genibus manibusque in mediá viá pronus sit, non inebrietur?  

            Custos:  Sed, domine, hic vir albam lineam in mediá viá convolvere conabatur!

        [Judge:  But a certain man, who is facedown in the middle of the street, is not drunk?  

        Police officer:  But, sir, this man was trying to roll up the white line in the middle of the road!]

        
        


    Vale,
    Livia

        Vale, et valete!  



    ----- Original Message -----
    From: "A. Tullia Scholastica" <fororom@.....>
    To: <Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com <mailto:Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com> >
    Sent: Thursday, December 17, 2009 9:41 AM
    Subject: [Nova-Roma] More Saturnalia fun: jocí Latíné

    A. Tullia Scholastica quiritibus, sociis, peregrinisque bonae voluntatis
    S.P.D.

    Now that Caeca’s fate is temporarily sealed, I can turn to lighter fare
    before heading on to the next paper, so here are a few jokes in Latin for
    the cognoscenti.  Translations will be provided for those unfortunates who
    do not yet know Latin.

    ====

    Prima:  Cur non reddidisti anulum quam tu invenisti?

    Secunda:  Non putavi esse necesse.

    Prima:  Quomodo?

    Secunda:  In anulo scriptum est:  Tuus in aeternum.

    [First woman:  Why didn’t you return the ring which you found?

    Second woman:  I didn’t think it was necessary.

    First woman:  Why?

    Second woman:  On the ring is the inscription [it is written] Yours for
    eternity].

    =====

    Civis:  Aliquis, custos, mihi magnam alapam duxit.

    Custos publicus:  Quis erat ille vir?

    Civis:  Nescio; sed autem vestigia illius digitorum in meo vultu sunt
    impressa.

    [Citizen:  Officer, someone gave me a hard slap.

    Police officer:  Who was that guy?

    Citizen:  I dunno, but the marks of his fingers are printed on my face].

    ========

    And especially for the season:

    Mulier:  Quomodo tantum potare assuevisti?

    Vir:  Propter res familiares.

    Mulier:  Fortasse tuum matrimonium est infelix?

    Vir:  Non.  Sed habeo tres affines qui omnes caupones sunt.

    [Woman:  How did you become accustomed to drink so much?

    Man:  Because of family matters.

    Woman:  Is your marriage unhappy, by any chance?

    Man:  No, but I have three relatives all of whom are innkeepers/tavern
    owners.

    ---all from Auxilium Latinum of long ago, translated by yours truly.

    ======

    Fruimini!  Enjoy!

    Valete.

     
       

    Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72661 From: GAIUS MARCIUS CRISPUS Date: 2009-12-18
    Subject: Re: new project
    gaius marcius crispus <from_sender-gaius@...>

    Salvete omnes

    One of my books suggests that the term `m.d.u.' is a Latin abbreviation for `More Dicto Utendus' which means
    `to be used as directed'.

    Io Saturnalia!

    Stuck in 5 inches of snow today.

    Valete optime

    Crispus
    Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72662 From: Cato Date: 2009-12-18
    Subject: Re: new project
    Cato Marcio Crispo sal.

    Nova Eboracum is expecting 3-6" (7-14cm) tonight!

    Vale,

    Cato

    --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "GAIUS MARCIUS CRISPUS" <jbshr1pwa@...> wrote:
    >
    > gaius marcius crispus <from_sender-gaius@...>
    >
    > Salvete omnes
    >
    > One of my books suggests that the term `m.d.u.' is a Latin abbreviation for `More Dicto Utendus' which means
    > `to be used as directed'.
    >
    > Io Saturnalia!
    >
    > Stuck in 5 inches of snow today.
    >
    > Valete optime
    >
    > Crispus
    >
    Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72663 From: Cn. Cornelius Lentulus Date: 2009-12-18
    Subject: Buy your Saturnalia gifts in the Nova Roman Amazon Shops!
    Lentulus magister aranearius Quiritibus sal.


    Io Saturnalia!

    Buy your Saturnalia gifts in the Nova Roman Amazon Shops! When you buy through these shops, including "similar items" and items from your "wish list", part of your purchase prices goes to support Nova Roma:

    http://www.novaroma.org/nr/Amazon_affiliate


    IO SATURNALIA!

    VIVAT NOVA ROMA IN AETERNUM!

    Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72664 From: M•IVL• SEVERVS Date: 2009-12-18
    Subject: IO TRIVMPHE! IO SATVRNALIA!

    IO TRIVMPHE!
    IO SATVRNALIA!
    IO TRIVMPHE!

    Happy, healthy, and joyous holidays to everyone here, with love and friendhsip above all.
    Best wishes for the New Year.
    Valete,
     
    M•IVL•SEVERVS
    CONSVL•NOVÆ•ROMÆ

    SENATOR
    CONSVL•PROVINCIÆ•MEXICI
    Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72665 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2009-12-18
    Subject: Re: More Saturnalia fun: jocí Latíné
    Re: [Nova-Roma] More Saturnalia fun:  jocí   Latíné

     
    A. Tullia Scholastica iterum L. Liviae Plautae T. Julio Sabino quiritibus, sociis, peregrinisque bonae voluntatis S.P.D.

        I see that, due to the ungodly hour at which I posted this, I missed translating a few words in the first sentence.  Ergo:

        Judge:  But a certain man who is on his hands and knees bending down face forward in the middle of the street is not drunk?  

        The second sentence stands.  Those who are familiar with yellow, rather than white, lines in the middle of the road might be surprised to learn that white used to be the normal color for these...many long years ago.  Traffic lights used to have only two colors, too:  red and green.  That, of course, made it much easier for certain parties to issue tickets for failing to observe this instant color change.  

    Valete.  

       


     
     A. Tullia Scholastica L. Liviae Plautae T. Julio Sabino quiritibus, sociis, peregrinisque bonae voluntatis S.P.D.
       

    Livia Scholasticae sal.

    These are much better than the jokes in the Assimil book!

        Assimil is not supposed to be a joke book, now is it?  ;-)  

    Plurimas gratias ago!

        ATS2:  Plurimas gratias tibi!  Sabine, these were not difficult to translate, at least not once one got past the idiom alapam ducere, which we learnt in Assimil, though I believe under a related term, colaphum ducere, which is to punch someone rather than to slap someone.  

        Here’s another one from a different Auxilium, also translated by yours truly:  

            Judex:  Sed quidam vir, qui genibus manibusque in mediá viá pronus sit, non inebrietur?  

            Custos:  Sed, domine, hic vir albam lineam in mediá viá convolvere conabatur!

        [Judge:  But a certain man, who is facedown in the middle of the street, is not drunk?  

        Police officer:  But, sir, this man was trying to roll up the white line in the middle of the road!]

        
        


    Vale,
    Livia

        Vale, et valete!  



    ----- Original Message -----
    From: "A. Tullia Scholastica" <fororom@.....>
    To: <Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com <mailto:Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com> >
    Sent: Thursday, December 17, 2009 9:41 AM
    Subject: [Nova-Roma] More Saturnalia fun: jocí Latíné

    A. Tullia Scholastica quiritibus, sociis, peregrinisque bonae voluntatis
    S.P.D.

    Now that Caeca’s fate is temporarily sealed, I can turn to lighter fare
    before heading on to the next paper, so here are a few jokes in Latin for
    the cognoscenti.  Translations will be provided for those unfortunates who
    do not yet know Latin.

    ====

    Prima:  Cur non reddidisti anulum quam tu invenisti?

    Secunda:  Non putavi esse necesse.

    Prima:  Quomodo?

    Secunda:  In anulo scriptum est:  Tuus in aeternum.

    [First woman:  Why didn’t you return the ring which you found?

    Second woman:  I didn’t think it was necessary.

    First woman:  Why?

    Second woman:  On the ring is the inscription [it is written] Yours for
    eternity].

    =====

    Civis:  Aliquis, custos, mihi magnam alapam duxit.

    Custos publicus:  Quis erat ille vir?

    Civis:  Nescio; sed autem vestigia illius digitorum in meo vultu sunt
    impressa.

    [Citizen:  Officer, someone gave me a hard slap.

    Police officer:  Who was that guy?

    Citizen:  I dunno, but the marks of his fingers are printed on my face].

    ========

    And especially for the season:

    Mulier:  Quomodo tantum potare assuevisti?

    Vir:  Propter res familiares.

    Mulier:  Fortasse tuum matrimonium est infelix?

    Vir:  Non.  Sed habeo tres affines qui omnes caupones sunt.

    [Woman:  How did you become accustomed to drink so much?

    Man:  Because of family matters.

    Woman:  Is your marriage unhappy, by any chance?

    Man:  No, but I have three relatives all of whom are innkeepers/tavern
    owners.

    ---all from Auxilium Latinum of long ago, translated by yours truly.

    ======

    Fruimini!  Enjoy!

    Valete.

     
       


       

    Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72666 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2009-12-18
    Subject: Re: new project
    Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: new project

     
     A. Tullia Scholastica C. Mario Crispo quiritibus, sociis, peregrinisque bonae voluntatis S.P.D.

    Salvete omnes

    One of my books suggests that the term `m.d.u.' is a Latin abbreviation for `More Dicto Utendus' which means
    `to be used as directed'.

        ATS:  Gratias quam plurimas!  Now THAT makes some sense.  Our doctors seem to be unfamiliar with this, and just use the English.  Latin is unknown to the younger crowd here; the Romans never made it this far.  

        Very few Latin words begin with u, and most which do seem to be adverbs or conjunctions, with a sprinkling of nouns, adjectives and verbs.  Utor (and usurpo) are among the few in the latter category.  

    Io Saturnalia!

    Stuck in 5 inches of snow today.

        ATS:  And Washington, DC, which is rather unfamiliar with the stuff, is supposed to get about 14 inches over the next day or so, with even more in parts of Virginia. This is our steamy South, innocent of such matters.  With luck the storm will track far enough east that it will spare my snowy area, though it seems NYC and maybe Boston will be treated to this mess.  

        On to reviewing my corrections of Caeca’s class’ exam...  <evil grin>  ;-)

        

    Valete optime

    Crispus

     Vale, et valete optime.
       

    Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72667 From: C.Maria Caeca Date: 2009-12-18
    Subject: Re: new project
    Caeca Scholasticae omnibusque sal,
     
    "On to reviewing my corrections of CaecaÂ’s classÂ’ exam...  <evil grin>  ;-)"
     
    OK, movie time!  Soft, threatening, scary music.  On screen, a mouse clicks send.  Evil laughter; fade.
     
    scary music gets more intense, audience in theater leans forward.  On screen a hand closes around a mouse, and begins to slide up the monitor screen. "don't open the email" the audience yells.  "Don't open the email!"  The mouse hovers ...crescendo of scary music ...then music stops.  Click.  One last loud dissonant chord and music stops, as though copped off.  Screen goes black, sound of terrified, agonized scream ...credits roll up ...in Latin!
     
    patron 1: "I *knew* she'd open that email!"
    patron 2: "yeah, they always do.  People in horror flicks are *so* stupid!"
     
    mwahahahaha!!!
     
    Io Saturnalia to all of us!  Perhaps we can carry this feeling of unity and good will well into the new Year ...if we want to ...if we try.  ya think?
     
    Valete quam optime,
    C. Maria Caeca

    Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72668 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2009-12-19
    Subject: Re: new project
    Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: new project

     
     A. Tullia Scholastica C. Mariae Caecae quiritibus, sociis, peregrinisque bonae voluntatis S.P.D.
       

    Caeca Scholasticae omnibusque sal,

    "On to reviewing my corrections of Caeca’s class’ exam...  <evil grin>  ;-)"
     
    OK, movie time!  Soft, threatening, scary music.  On screen, a mouse clicks send.  Evil laughter; fade.

        ATS:  Now, now...
     
    scary music gets more intense, audience in theater leans forward.  On screen a hand closes around a mouse, and begins to slide up the monitor screen. "don't open the email" the audience yells.  "Don't open the email!"  The mouse hovers ...crescendo of scary music ...then music stops.  Click.  One last loud dissonant chord and music stops, as though copped off.  Screen goes black, sound of terrified, agonized scream ...credits roll up ...in Latin!
     
    patron 1: "I *knew* she'd open that email!"
    patron 2: "yeah, they always do.  People in horror flicks are *so* stupid!"
     
    mwahahahaha!!!

        ATS:  By now you should have received your revised corrections, and should have headed for a soothing glass/cup of whatever.  Caeca, you must stop devaluing your abilities...you are a good and diligent student.  
     
    Io Saturnalia to all of us!  Perhaps we can carry this feeling of unity and good will well into the new Year ...if we want to ...if we try.  ya think?

        ATS:  I have a little something to send separately later on which might be in the spirit of the season.  In the meantime, however, here’s another joke (or two, or three) from AL:

    ======

        Professor:  Successores Mohammedi appellantur Califae.  Quid ergo est nomen patriae eorum?  

        Discipulus:  California.

        [Professor:  The successors of Mohammed are called Califs.  Therefore what is the name of their homeland?

        Student:  California.  

    =======

        Mater:  Erasne hodie malus puer in scholá?  

        Filius:  Non, mater mea.  Hodie in scholá in angulo per totum diem stabam.

        [Mother:  Were you a naughty boy in school today?

        Son:  No, mom.  Today I stood in the corner all day long in school].

    =======

        Magister:  Quaenam tria vocabula discipulis saepissime usurpantur?

        Discipulus:  Ego non scio.  [ATS:  normal Latin would be one word, nescio].  

        Magister:  Recté dicis.  

        [Teacher:  What {the heck} are the three words students use most often?

        Pupil:  I don’t know.  

        Teacher:  You’re right].  

    ========


        

            
     
    Valete quam optime,
    C. Maria Caeca

    Valete!  

     
       

    Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72669 From: A. Decia Scriptrix Date: 2009-12-19
    Subject: Re: new project
    A Decia Scriptrix C Mariae Caecae omnibusque SPD
     
    More for your list;
     
    7. Loads of legal terms in Latin - knowing them keeps those legal eagles from seeming so intimidating.
     
    8. Witout Latin no primary sources - will have to rely on historical translations that might not be totally accurate and would have been influenced by the policies of the day.
     
    Io Saturnalia!

    On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 11:22 PM, C.Maria Caeca <c.mariacaeca@...> wrote:
     

    

    Caeca Scholasticae omnibusque sal,
     
    wonderful!  OK, 5 ...and I'll add another in a minute.  BTW, I trust we will be hearing that charming little sung on the net podcast?  Now we've got 5 reasons, all given by the ladies of NR!  Hmmm ...gentlemen, get busy, or we shall have to found the No. 1 Ladies' um, list creation agency!
     
    6.  If you know Latin, you can read your chart, and know more about it than you doctor, who probably hasn't studied Latin.
     
    Vale optime,
    Caeca


    Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72670 From: C.Maria Caeca Date: 2009-12-19
    Subject: Re: new project
    Caeca Magistrae omnibusque sal,
     
    Oh ...I was just having a bit of fun with you!  I'd blame my evil twin, but she'd get even!  Loved the jokes, too ...and only partly needed the translations!
     
    And yes, I am having a celebratory glass of wine ...for Saturnalia, for doing better than I thought I would on part I, and because I'm warm, and finally *dry*, and oh ...because despite high wind and driving rain, I made it safely home, even with a couple of hydroplaning cars aimed in my general direction!
     
    Valete Bene,
    C. Maria Caeca
    Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72671 From: C.Maria Caeca Date: 2009-12-19
    Subject: Re: new project
    
    Salvete omnes,
     
    Gratias tibi ago!
     
    9.  Knowing Latin terms lets you laugh when you watch TV shows which use them incorrectly!
     
    Io Saturnalia!
     
    Valete bene,
    C. Maria Caeca
    Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72672 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2009-12-19
    Subject: Offtopic: Bambi & Thumper
    Attachments :
      Offtopic:  Bambi & Thumper A. Tullia Scholastica quiritibus, sociis, peregrinisque bonae voluntatis S.P.D.

          Recently my brother sent me several charming pictures of a real Bambi and Thumper pair.  In the spirit of the season, I am pasting a reduced version of one of them below, which I hope survives the trip.  Others show Bambi licking Thumper, and both of them nuzzling one another.  

          Fruimini!

          Valete!

        


          

      Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72673 From: Marcus Iulius Scaeva Date: 2009-12-19
      Subject: Re: new project
      Salvete omnes,
       
      10.  To read the history of Rome as it was written by those who lived it and not translated into insufficient tongues.
       
      Valete,
       
      M. Iulius Scaeva
       

       



      From: C.Maria Caeca <c.mariacaeca@...>
      To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
      Sent: Sat, December 19, 2009 12:37:19 AM
      Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] new project

       

      

      Salvete omnes,
       
      Gratias tibi ago!
       
      9.  Knowing Latin terms lets you laugh when you watch TV shows which use them incorrectly!
       
      Io Saturnalia!
       
      Valete bene,
      C. Maria Caeca
      Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72674 From: C.Maria Caeca Date: 2009-12-19
      Subject: Re: new project
      
      Salvete omnes,
       
      Gratias tibi ago!  Finally ...a satyr among the nymphs! (laughing).  OK, 15 (or more) to go!
       
      Valete bene,
      C. Maria Caeca
      Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72675 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2009-12-19
      Subject: Re: new project
      Re: [Nova-Roma] new project

       
       A. Tullia Scholastica A. Deciae Scriptrici C. Mariae Caecae quiritibus, sociis, peregrinisque bonae voluntatis S.P.D.
         

      A Decia Scriptrix C Mariae Caecae omnibusque SPD
       
      More for your list;
       
      7. Loads of legal terms in Latin - knowing them keeps those legal eagles from seeming so intimidating.

          ATS:  Nolo contendere.  Stare decisis bonum videtur.  ;-)  
       
      8. Witout Latin no primary sources - will have to rely on historical translations that might not be totally accurate and would have been influenced by the policies of the day.

          ATS:  Indeed.  This, of course, is true for all Latin texts; those who can read it may profit from the works of the likes of Caesar, Cicero, Horace, and Vergil, just to name a few.  No translation can ever completely copy the feel of the original.  Of course, this is also true in Greek, and even more so.  For example, a language which lacks grammatical gender, or which has only two genders, cannot reproduce the true meaning of Elektra’s lament in Sophokles:  thn mhden es to mhden, for this depends entirely on grammatical gender being altered for poetical purposes, and that is hardly the only place where words or concepts in that language cannot make the trip to another tongue.  
       
      Io Saturnalia!

       Io!

      Vale, et valete.  

      On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 11:22 PM, C.Maria Caeca <c.mariacaeca@...> wrote:
       
      
      Caeca Scholasticae omnibusque sal,
       
      wonderful!  OK, 5 ...and I'll add another in a minute.  BTW, I trust we will be hearing that charming little sung on the net podcast?  Now we've got 5 reasons, all given by the ladies of NR!  Hmmm ...gentlemen, get busy, or we shall have to found the No. 1 Ladies' um, list creation agency!
       
      6.  If you know Latin, you can read your chart, and know more about it than you doctor, who probably hasn't studied Latin.
       
      Vale optime,
      Caeca

       
         

      Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72676 From: Gaius Petronius Dexter Date: 2009-12-19
      Subject: Last report of the Senate session.
      C. Petronius Dexter tribunus Plebis Quiritibus Plebeis plurimam salutem dicit,
       
      As you know the last reporting of the Senate's meeting is not yet published.
      According the law Moravia de renuntiatione Senatus actorum:
      "The reporting Tribune shall report the results of the Senate meeting in the Forum romanum and the Comitia Plebis Tributa forum/-a (1) within 168 hours (7 days) of the close of voting of the Senate."
       
      The reporting tribune who published the Agenda of this last session was C. Vipsanius Agrippa, in the message #72344 on Saturday Nov. 28.
      See more at this link:
       
      Making that message, C. Vipsanius Agrippa followed the Law Moravia de renuntiatione Senatus actorum which states:
       
      "I. Procedures for Reporting the Senate's Call to Order.
      A. The reporting Tribune shall publish the agenda of the Senate's meeting in the Forum romanum and the Comitia Plebis Tributa forum/-a (1)within 72 hours of the presiding magistrate's call to order of the Senate."
       
      But as the results of the Senate meeting was given on december, first the Tribune of December was not clearly designed and these results had fallen during the tribunes Plebis election, so a unexperienced confusion followed... Who had to report the Senate's voting? Former tribunes who are not yet in fonction or new Tribunes who were not present at this session? The law Moravia speaks about "reporting tribune" and also gives a deadline of 7 days.
       
      Here the problem:
       
      The Senate shall be called into session during the second hour (08.30 hrs. CET)
      on Saturday, 28 November 2761 [In fact 2762], with discussions to continue until approximately
      the end of the day (16.00 hrs CET) on Tuesday, December 1st, 2761. [In fact 2762]

      Voting on the agenda will then begin in the first hour at 07.30 hrs CET on
      Wednesday, December 2nd, 2761[In fact 2762] and conclude at 16.00 hrs CET on Thursday
      December 3rd, 2761. [In fact 2762]
       
      The Dec. 3rd 16h00 + 7 days = Dec. 10th. So we are in the example of a Senate session called during tribunes Plebis election!
       
      My opinion is for the future that the tribunes Plebis, if a Senate session is held during the period of tribunes Plebis election, they together will have to make an intercessio to stop this session and transfer it after the result of the voting of the Comitia Plebis Tributa.
       
      So because the Lex Moravia de renuntiatione Senatus actorum is not applicable in the case of the change of the complete college of the tribunes, with a reporting tribune in fonction when the Senate is called and not yet in fonction when the deadline is entirely achieved, and because this Senate voting is important to my fellow Plebeians, as tribune Plebis sacrosanct I will report today or tomorrow the last Senate votings even if I was not present during this session.  I only had the right to rejoing the Senatus group Wednesday the December 16th. So I beg you a short time of patience.
       
      I am convinced that the Senate decisions must be known by all of us Plebeians. And as long as these Senatus votes will be unknown by our citizens nor reported into our Forum Romanum I, as tribune Plebis, will "veto" in my conscience a next "Senate calling to order" and I will do an intercessio against the magistrate who will want convene the Senate.
       
      Valete omnes et felicia Saturnalia degite!
       
      C. Petronius Dexter
      Tribunus Plebis.


       
       
       
      Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72677 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2009-12-19
      Subject: Re: new project
      Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: new project

       
       A. Tullia Scholastica C. Mariae Caecae quiritibus, sociis, peregrinisque bonae voluntatis S.P.D.
         

      Caeca Magistrae omnibusque sal,

      Oh ...I was just having a bit of fun with you!

          ATS:  Oh, I figured that!

       I'd blame my evil twin, but she'd get even!  Loved the jokes, too ...

          ATS:  I’m glad you did!


      and only partly needed the translations!

          ATS:  See!  Even after only one semester of Latin, you can already understand something you never saw before!  Some of the vocabulary there is rather odd and the original is heavily annotated, so you should feel quite proud that you can understand some of this.  Somehow I don’t need those notes...


      And yes, I am having a celebratory glass of wine ...for Saturnalia, for doing better than I thought I would on part I,

          ATS:  As I said, don’t put yourself down.  Besides, perhaps your invocations worked.  ;-)


      and because I'm warm, and finally *dry*, and oh ...because despite high wind and driving rain, I made it safely home,

          ATS: Optimé!  Keep warm and dry!  Hope you escape the monster storm.  

      even with a couple of hydroplaning cars aimed in my general direction!

          ATS:  What the heck is the matter with these folks?  Do they have driver ed down there?  I question whether they do in Maryland, given the abominable behaviors there, but Atlanta is supposed to be a gentler place than the vicinity of DC.  Of course up here we have laws forbidding yakking on the phone while driving and/or writing messages while driving on top of the DWI ones, which should help with paying attention to the road instead of to extraneous concerns, but that sort of thing may not have made its way down south yet...

      Valete Bene,
      C. Maria Caeca

      Vale et valete bene.  

         

      Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72678 From: marcushoratius Date: 2009-12-19
      Subject: a. d. XIV Kalendas Ianuarias: OPALIA; Juventas
      M. Moravius Piscinus Horatianus cultoribus Deorum, Quiritibus et omnibus salutem plurimam dicit: Io Saturnalia! Io Triumphe!

      Hodie est ante diem XIIII Kalendas Ianuarias; haec dies nefastus est: Opalia feriae

      "Saturnus, Great King of ancient starry skies and earth primeval, under Your peaceful reign never was anyone's tranquility disturbed by labor. ~ M. Valerius Martialis 12.62.1

      Principes Dei Caelum et Terra. Idem principes in Latio Saturnus et Ops.

      "The first Gods were Sky and Earth. These Gods are the same as those who in Egypt are called Serapis and Isis, though Harpocrates with his finger makes a sign bidding me to be silent. In Latium the same first Gods were Saturnus and Ops. For Terra and Caelum, as the mysteries of Samothrace teach, are Great Gods, Â… but these are those whom the Augurum Libri mention in writing as the Potent Gods, Divi Potes, for what the Samothracians call Theoi Dynatoi." ~ Varro, Lingua Latinae 5.57-58

      "And why do they consider Saturnus Father of Truth? Is it that they think, as do certain philosophers that Saturnus (Kronos) is Time (Chronos), and Time discovers the truth? Or because it is likely that the fabled Golden Age of Saturnus, if it was an age of the greatest righteousness, participated most largely in truth?" ~ Plutarch, Roman Questions 12

      O Eternal Creatrix

      "O eternal Creatrix of Gods and men, who animates forest and stream with soul, and joins seeds of life together throughout the world, and You bear the stones of Pyrrha that were enlivened into men by the hand of Prometheus. Hungry men You were first to give nourishment with a variety of foods. You encircle and carry the sea within You. Under Your power are the gentleness of domesticated herds and the ferocity of wild beasts and the repose from flight of birds. Firm and immobile, unsetting power of the earth suspended in the vacuum of space, You are the center around which the rapid heavens revolve." ~ P. Papinius Statius, Thebais 8.303-312


      AUC 562 / 191 BCE: Dedication of the Temple of Iuventas in the Circus Maximus.

      "Another dedication was that of the temple of Juventas in the Circus Maximus, which was carried out by C. Licinius Lucullus. M. Livius had vowed it on the day when he destroyed Hasdrubal and his army, and when he was censor he signed the contract for its construction in the consulship of M. Cornelius and P. Sempronius. Games were celebrated in connection with this dedication also and everything was done with greater solemnity in view of the fresh war which was impending with Antiochus." ~ Titus Livius 36.36.4-5

      The temple of Juventas was vowed by M. Livius Salinator in the midst of the Battle on the Metaurus in 207 BCE. He later began work on the temple in 204 BCE when he became censor. It stood in the district of the Circus Maximus, near the Temple of Summanus, and probably on the lower slope of the Aventine Hill. The temple was then dedicated in 193 or 191 BCE, depending on the reckoning, by consul C. Licinius Lucullus. Upon the departure of Augustus for Gaul in 16 BCE, the temple of Juventas burned for unexplained causes, and was recorded as one of other portents. Augustus later restored the temple. Upon entering manhood, donning the toga civilis, the youths of Rome were to offer at the temple of Juventas. This custom was attributed to Servius Tullius in the Annales of L. Piso, referring to the temple of Juventas on the Capitoline Hill, but is thought to have been followed at the Aventine temple of Juventas instead after Augustus had restored it. (Dionysis of Halicarnass 4.15.5; Cassius Dio 54.19.7; Re Geste 4.8)


      Our thought for today is from Epictetus, Enchiridion 50:

      "Whatever rules you have adopted, abide by them as laws, and as if you would be impious to transgress them; and do not regard what any one says of you, for this, after all, is no concern of yours."
      Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72679 From: petronius_dexter Date: 2009-12-19
      Subject: Re: Last report of the Senate session.
      C. Petronius Dexter tribunus Plebis Quiritibus Plebeis plurimam salutem dicit,

      Another problem.
      The number of senators is not clearly defined.
      What source do we have to follow?

      If I follow the Censorial page of NRWiki:
      http://www.novaroma.org/nr/Senators_(Nova_Roma)

      The Senate is composed with:
      1 Princeps Senatus,
      6 Censorii Senatores,
      5 Consulares Senatores
      6 Praetorii Senatores,
      4 Aedilicii Senatores,
      3 Tribunicii Senatores,
      4 Quaestorii Senatores,
      1 Privatus Senator.

      The total is 30 Senatores. And the 2/3 of the Senate are 20. But I read on the Senate list that the 2/3 of senators are 22!

      NB: The NRWiki page actually does not seem updated because you have the former tribunes of the Plebs yet written as magistrates with the ius sententiae.

      Moreover, the senator Palladius casted the proxy votes of M. Minucius Audens, while this hon. senator is said "former senator". With the mention resigned in 17 August 2009!

      So even a mother cat could not find her kitties into the official Nova Roma pages. ;o)

      This problem of quorum 2/3 senators is important about the "Item II" but with a 2/3 at 20 or a 2/3 at 22 the result is the same, the senators who voted "Vti Rogas" id est "Yes" for the Item II was under this qualified majority.

      Question: How much are current senators?

      Optime vale.

      C. Petronius Dexter
      Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72680 From: Gnaeus Equitius Marinus Date: 2009-12-19
      Subject: Re: Last report of the Senate session.
      Salve Dexter,

      petronius_dexter <jfarnoud94@...> writes:

      > If I follow the Censorial page of NRWiki:
      > http://www.novaroma.org/nr/Senators_(Nova_Roma)

      You're correct that this page should be a good reference, but it's up
      to the Censors to maintain it since they're charged with maintaining
      the Album Senatorium. Looking at the edit history, I see that it was
      last updated on 3 November, so it should be correct.

      > The Senate is composed with:
      > 1 Princeps Senatus,
      > 6 Censorii Senatores,
      > 5 Consulares Senatores
      > 6 Praetorii Senatores,
      > 4 Aedilicii Senatores,
      > 3 Tribunicii Senatores,
      > 4 Quaestorii Senatores,
      > 1 Privatus Senator.
      >
      > The total is 30 Senatores. And the 2/3 of the Senate are 20. But I
      > read on the Senate list that the 2/3 of senators are 22!

      Unless that came from the Censors I'd say you should go with the
      number 20. Remember that we have a number of people with the ius
      senatoria who are not actually senators, but can vote during senate
      meetings. If some of those people show up for a meeting and vote,
      they do change the numbers for the 2/3 requirement. Since M. Minucius
      Audens falls under this category his vote does not change the number
      required for a 2/3 majority (see the Lex Popillia Senatoribus) but
      does count toward the majority if it was in favor.


      > NB: The NRWiki page actually does not seem updated because you have
      > the former tribunes of the Plebs yet written as magistrates with the
      > ius sententiae.

      As I noted above, it was last updated on 3 November.

      > Moreover, the senator Palladius casted the proxy votes of M.
      > Minucius Audens, while this hon. senator is said "former senator".
      > With the mention resigned in 17 August 2009!

      That is correct. While M. Minucius Audens' citizenship was restored,
      he was not returned to the Senate as far as I know. But, as a former
      consul, he retains the ius senatoria anyway. So he can vote in the
      Senate when he chooses to, and he's allowed to be subscribed to the
      Senate mailing list.

      > Question: How much are current senators?

      After reviewing the senate mailing list and the album civium, I'm
      convinced that there are currently 30 senators, as shown on the page at
      http://www.novaroma.org/nr/List_of_current_senators

      Vale,

      CN-EQVIT-MARINVS
      Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72681 From: petronius_dexter Date: 2009-12-19
      Subject: Re: Last report of the Senate session.
      Salve Marine,

      > Looking at the edit history, I see that it was
      > last updated on 3 November, so it should be correct.

      I have not this wise custom to look at the edit history.

      > Unless that came from the Censors I'd say you should go with the
      > number 20.

      The quorum 2/3 at 22 is on the consular report of the result voting posted on the Senate list.

      (...)
      > Since M. Minucius Audens falls under
      > this category his vote does not change the number
      > required for a 2/3 majority (see the Lex Popillia Senatoribus) but
      > does count toward the majority if it was in favor.

      I have some difficult with English, and I do not understand well the point IV of the Lex Popillia Senatoria. I suppose that the case of Minucius Audens is in the point:
      "D. No dictatorius, censorius, consularis, or praetorius shall be counted toward the total number of senatores unless he or she has already been sublected by the censores."

      > While M. Minucius Audens' citizenship was restored,
      > he was not returned to the Senate as far as I know. But, as a
      > former consul, he retains the ius senatoria anyway.

      So, his votes given by Iunius Palladius count, but Minucius Audens himself cannot change the total number of senatores...

      > After reviewing the senate mailing list and the album civium, I'm
      > convinced that there are currently 30 senators,

      Thank you for your appreciated help!

      Optime vale.

      C. Petronius Dexter
      Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72682 From: petronius_dexter Date: 2009-12-19
      Subject: Re: Last report of the Senate session.
      C. Petronius Dexter tribunus Plebis omnibus Quiritibus salutem plurimam dicit,

      I am proud to announce you that I have written the reporting of the last Senate session. I wanted to post it today/tonight but seeing that it is a nefastus day (NP) I prefer waiting for tomorrow morning after the sunrise which is a comitialis dies(C) and by the way the "Sigillaria" a day with sharing of gifts.

      Valete.

      C. Petronius Dexter
      Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72683 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2009-12-19
      Subject: Re: Last report of the Senate session.
      Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: Last report of the Senate session.

       A. Tullia Scholastica C. Petronio Dextro quiritibus bonae voluntatis S.P.D.
       
         

      C. Petronius Dexter tribunus Plebis omnibus Quiritibus salutem plurimam dicit,

      I am proud to announce you that I have written the reporting of the last Senate session. I wanted to post it today/tonight but seeing that it is a nefastus day (NP) I prefer waiting for tomorrow morning after the sunrise which is a comitialis dies(C) and by the way the "Sigillaria" a day with sharing of gifts.

          ATS:  I am glad that the report is being prepared at last.  However, it is customary for the tribunes to post the reports to the senate as drafts BEFORE sending them to the public lists.  Please give us the opportunity to correct any errors before posting them publicly.  As you know, Consul Severus has posted a preliminary version in the senate, but there are some additions and a subtraction or two to be made (quid fieri...) before publishing this.  

          Inasmuch as this is a busy time of year when many are away, or soon will be, this report  may have to be delayed despite its inordinate tardiness.  Note, too, that the eastern part of my country has been treated to two or more feet of snow today, even in the south where that stuff rarely appears, and at least two senators (probably four or five) reside in the affected area.  I am just barely far enough west that this storm is not supposed to visit us.  Power outages are likely in these regions, and it would be best to wait for senatorial input, which may be delayed.  Perhaps a simple listing of the results might do for now, with the commentaries added later.  

          Hope none of you was in the chunnel during this little train stoppage overnight or whatever...

      Valete.

      C. Petronius Dexter

       Vale, et valete.  
         

      Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72684 From: rory12001 Date: 2009-12-19
      Subject: Re: Last report of the Senate session.
      M. Hortensia C. Petronio A Tulliaeque spd;
      the tribunes are independent, responsible only to the Plebs. The Senate is no longer in session, And the Senate is now closed between sessions. we voted on this and it passed.

      If Dexter posts something, let the senators reply on the ML. It's bad enough that a Senate session went unreported.

      vale
      Maior, plebeian


      ---
      >
      > >
      > > A. Tullia Scholastica C. Petronio Dextro quiritibus bonae voluntatis S.P.D.
      > >
      > >
      > >
      > > C. Petronius Dexter tribunus Plebis omnibus Quiritibus salutem plurimam dicit,
      > >
      > > I am proud to announce you that I have written the reporting of the last
      > > Senate session. I wanted to post it today/tonight but seeing that it is a
      > > nefastus day (NP) I prefer waiting for tomorrow morning after the sunrise
      > > which is a comitialis dies(C) and by the way the "Sigillaria" a day with
      > > sharing of gifts.
      > >
      > > ATS: I am glad that the report is being prepared at last. However, it is
      > > customary for the tribunes to post the reports to the senate as drafts BEFORE
      > > sending them to the public lists. Please give us the opportunity to correct
      > > any errors before posting them publicly. As you know, Consul Severus has
      > > posted a preliminary version in the senate, but there are some additions and a
      > > subtraction or two to be made (quid fieri...) before publishing this.
      > >
      > > Inasmuch as this is a busy time of year when many are away, or soon will
      > > be, this report may have to be delayed despite its inordinate tardiness.
      > > Note, too, that the eastern part of my country has been treated to two or more
      > > feet of snow today, even in the south where that stuff rarely appears, and at
      > > least two senators (probably four or five) reside in the affected area. I am
      > > just barely far enough west that this storm is not supposed to visit us.
      > > Power outages are likely in these regions, and it would be best to wait for
      > > senatorial input, which may be delayed. Perhaps a simple listing of the
      > > results might do for now, with the commentaries added later.
      > >
      > > Hope none of you was in the chunnel during this little train stoppage
      > > overnight or whatever...
      > >
      > > Valete.
      > >
      > > C. Petronius Dexter
      > >
      > > Vale, et valete.
      > >
      >
      Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72685 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2009-12-19
      Subject: Re: Last report of the Senate session.
      Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: Last report of the Senate session.

       A. Tullia Scholastica M. Hortensiae Majori C. Petronio Dextro quiritibus bonae voluntatis S.P.D.

         
       
         

      M. Hortensia C. Petronio A Tulliaeque spd;
       the tribunes are independent, responsible only to the Plebs. The Senate is no longer in session,

          ATS:  My understanding is that the Senate is in session until the tribunes issue their report.  


      And the Senate is now closed between sessions. we voted on this and it passed.

          ATS:  Yes, unfortunately, and we have another list where we can vet the report if need be...but the Senate is in session until the report is issued, ergo we don’t have to use that new list for the purpose.  Thing is, people are away or otherwise busy for the holidays...and snow removal duty.  

      If Dexter posts something, let the senators reply on the ML. It's bad enough that a Senate session went unreported.

          ATS:  That is inappropriate.   We need not correct errors on the report in public.   Get it right first, THEN publish it.  Yes, it is a shame that the session was not reported, but the problem was that we had to get the SCU done so the tribuni could take office on the 10th, as had been done in antiquity and the past in NR, but no one was then responsible for the report.  
       
       vale
       Maior, plebeian

      Vale, et valete.
       

      ---
      >
      > >  
      > >  A. Tullia Scholastica C. Petronio Dextro quiritibus bonae voluntatis S.P.D.
      > >  
      > >    
      > >
      > > C. Petronius Dexter tribunus Plebis omnibus Quiritibus salutem plurimam dicit,
      > >
      > > I am proud to announce you that I have written the reporting of the last
      > > Senate session. I wanted to post it today/tonight but seeing that it is a
      > > nefastus day (NP) I prefer waiting for tomorrow morning after the sunrise
      > > which is a comitialis dies(C) and by the way the "Sigillaria" a day with
      > > sharing of gifts.
      > >
      > >     ATS:  I am glad that the report is being prepared at last.  However, it is
      > > customary for the tribunes to post the reports to the senate as drafts BEFORE
      > > sending them to the public lists.  Please give us the opportunity to correct
      > > any errors before posting them publicly.  As you know, Consul Severus has
      > > posted a preliminary version in the senate, but there are some additions and a
      > > subtraction or two to be made (quid fieri...) before publishing this.
      > >
      > >     Inasmuch as this is a busy time of year when many are away, or soon will
      > > be, this report  may have to be delayed despite its inordinate tardiness.
      > > Note, too, that the eastern part of my country has been treated to two or more
      > > feet of snow today, even in the south where that stuff rarely appears, and at
      > > least two senators (probably four or five) reside in the affected area.  I am
      > > just barely far enough west that this storm is not supposed to visit us.
      > > Power outages are likely in these regions, and it would be best to wait for
      > > senatorial input, which may be delayed.  Perhaps a simple listing of the
      > > results might do for now, with the commentaries added later.
      > >
      > >     Hope none of you was in the chunnel during this little train stoppage
      > > overnight or whatever...
      > >
      > > Valete.
      > >
      > > C. Petronius Dexter
      > >
      > >  Vale, et valete.
      > >
      >

       
         

      Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72686 From: rory12001 Date: 2009-12-20
      Subject: Re: Last report of the Senate session.
      Maior Scholasticae spd;

      Scholastica, allow me to point out that this is plebeian business and you are a patrician. It really is inappropriate for patricians to interfere in our affairs. Though I can appreciate your desire for vetting, but that time has passed. The plebs' rights to be informed come first

      I look forward to Dexter's report. It's good to see the tribunes ensuring the plebs traditional rights.
      May all enjoy the Saturnalia!
      bene vale in pacem Saturni
      Maior

      > >
      > > ATS: That is inappropriate. We need not correct errors on the report in
      > > public. Get it right first, THEN publish it. Yes, it is a shame that the
      > > session was not reported, but the problem was that we had to get the SCU done
      > > so the tribuni could take office on the 10th, as had been done in antiquity
      > > and the past in NR, but no one was then responsible for the report.
      > >
      > > vale
      > > Maior, plebeian
      > >
      > > Vale, et valete.
      > >
      > >
      > > ---
      > >> >
      > >>> > >
      > >>> > > A. Tullia Scholastica C. Petronio Dextro quiritibus bonae voluntatis
      > >>> S.P.D.
      > >>> > >
      > >>> > >
      > >>> > >
      > >>> > > C. Petronius Dexter tribunus Plebis omnibus Quiritibus salutem plurimam
      > >>> dicit,
      > >>> > >
      > >>> > > I am proud to announce you that I have written the reporting of the last
      > >>> > > Senate session. I wanted to post it today/tonight but seeing that it is
      > a
      > >>> > > nefastus day (NP) I prefer waiting for tomorrow morning after the
      > >>> sunrise
      > >>> > > which is a comitialis dies(C) and by the way the "Sigillaria" a day with
      > >>> > > sharing of gifts.
      > >>> > >
      > >>> > > ATS: I am glad that the report is being prepared at last. However,
      > >>> it is
      > >>> > > customary for the tribunes to post the reports to the senate as drafts
      > >>> BEFORE
      > >>> > > sending them to the public lists. Please give us the opportunity to
      > >>> correct
      > >>> > > any errors before posting them publicly. As you know, Consul Severus
      > has
      > >>> > > posted a preliminary version in the senate, but there are some additions
      > >>> and a
      > >>> > > subtraction or two to be made (quid fieri...) before publishing this.
      > >>> > >
      > >>> > > Inasmuch as this is a busy time of year when many are away, or soon
      > >>> will
      > >>> > > be, this report may have to be delayed despite its inordinate
      > >>> tardiness.
      > >>> > > Note, too, that the eastern part of my country has been treated to two
      > >>> or more
      > >>> > > feet of snow today, even in the south where that stuff rarely appears,
      > >>> and at
      > >>> > > least two senators (probably four or five) reside in the affected area.
      > >>> I am
      > >>> > > just barely far enough west that this storm is not supposed to visit us.
      > >>> > > Power outages are likely in these regions, and it would be best to wait
      > for
      > >>> > > senatorial input, which may be delayed. Perhaps a simple listing of the
      > >>> > > results might do for now, with the commentaries added later.
      > >>> > >
      > >>> > > Hope none of you was in the chunnel during this little train
      > >>> stoppage
      > >>> > > overnight or whatever...
      > >>> > >
      > >>> > > Valete.
      > >>> > >
      > >>> > > C. Petronius Dexter
      > >>> > >
      > >>> > > Vale, et valete.
      > >>> > >
      > >> >
      > >
      > >
      > >
      >
      Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72687 From: Cato Date: 2009-12-20
      Subject: Re: Last report of the Senate session.
      Cato Maiori Peronio Dextero Tulliae Scholasticae SPD

      Let me please point out that the business of the Senate is the business of the Respublica. The Senate's prerogative to correct any mistakes in an official report of its activities is paramount as the supreme policy-making body of the State. The "time" has certainly not "passed" for a correct report to be prepared and issued.

      Petronius Dexter, I fully support your quite correct desire to get this report issued, but I urge you, as someone who has shown a strong declared desire for proper action, to submit your report first - in accordance with historic practice - to the Senate for its approval first.

      Optime valete,

      Cato

      P.S. - they're saying we may get two feet (.75m) of snow in the city! Hooray! GEC


      --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "rory12001" <rory12001@...> wrote:
      >
      >
      >
      > Maior Scholasticae spd;
      >
      > Scholastica, allow me to point out that this is plebeian business and you are a patrician. It really is inappropriate for patricians to interfere in our affairs. Though I can appreciate your desire for vetting, but that time has passed. The plebs' rights to be informed come first
      >
      > I look forward to Dexter's report. It's good to see the tribunes ensuring the plebs traditional rights.
      > May all enjoy the Saturnalia!
      > bene vale in pacem Saturni
      > Maior
      Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72688 From: petronius_dexter Date: 2009-12-20
      Subject: Re: Last report of the Senate session.
      C. Petronius A. Tulliae Scholasticae s.p.d.,

      > ATS: I am glad that the report is being prepared at last. However, it is customary for the tribunes to post the reports to the senate as drafts BEFORE sending them to the public lists. Please give us the opportunity to correct any errors before posting them publicly.<

      Being not English it is manifeste that it will be errors and mistakes into this report but, as the "Journal Officiel" in France, I mostly verbatim copied the arguments and the words given by senators. I give sometimes my own reflexions but not about the items themselves more about some things which amazing me.

      I followed the Lex Moravia de renuntiatione Senatus actorum, better in my opinion, Lex Moravia de actis Senatus referrendis, and it is not a custom very interesting to submit his report to the knowledge of the Senate before its publishing. But, I sent a draft to my colleagues Tribunes of the Plebs.

      >>> As you know, Consul Severus has posted a preliminary version in the senate, but there are some additions and a subtraction or two to be made (quid fieri...) before publishing this.<<<

      I did not take example on this consular reporting, more a indicator board than an article of the "Journal Officiel", but I followed the example of the reporting on July by the tribune Appius Galerius Aurelianus.

      I put my own touch with the names' abbreviations. Some of you shall be astonished but I like to be astonishing.

      Optime vale.

      C. Petronius Dexter
      Tribunus Plebis
      Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72689 From: petronius_dexter Date: 2009-12-20
      Subject: Re: Last report of the Senate session.
      C. Petronius C. Catoni s.p.d.,

      > Let me please point out that the business of the Senate is the business of the Respublica. The Senate's prerogative to correct any mistakes in an official report of its activities is paramount as the supreme policy-making body of the State. The "time" has certainly not "passed" for a correct report to be prepared and issued.

      As I saw in the Senate list, even edictum and laws are "badly written" according to you. A Senate voting reporting is not a novel. My report is honest. I copied the arguments of anybody of you. I listed them in following the order of the rank of any senator. First the consules, as convening magistrates, following the Princeps Senatus, the censorii, the consulares... This is a report, not a pamphlet of propaganda.

      > Petronius Dexter, I fully support your quite correct desire to get this report issued, but I urge you, as someone who has shown a strong declared desire for proper action, to submit your report first - in accordance with historic practice - to the Senate for its approval first.

      This sort of practice is the better fashion to make this report late more and more. If any of the 30 senators have to correct the report, it will be published on March 2010 at least. And as it is passed on the Item IV, New rules of the Senate, I do not want to engender endless discussions with the correcting of this report on the Senate list.

      This report cannot wait more.

      C. Petronius Dexter
      Tribunus Plebis
      Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72690 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2009-12-20
      Subject: Re: Last report of the Senate session.
      Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: Last report of the Senate session.

       
       A. Tullia Scholastica C. Equitio Catoni M. Hortensiae Majori C. Petronio Dextro quiritibus bonae voluntatis S.P.D.
         

      Cato Maiori Peronio Dextero Tulliae Scholasticae SPD

      Let me please point out that the business of the Senate is the business of the Respublica.

          ATS:  I agree.  This is NOT purely a plebeian matter at all.  If it were, the Senate reports might find their way to the CPT list, and nowhere else.  

       The Senate's prerogative to correct any mistakes in an official report of its activities is paramount as the supreme policy-making body of the State.  The "time" has certainly not "passed" for a correct report to be prepared and issued.

          ATS:  Again, I agree.  Better late than never...but it must be correct.

      Petronius Dexter, I fully support your quite correct desire to get this report issued, but I urge you, as someone who has shown a strong declared desire for proper action, to submit your report first - in accordance with historic practice - to the Senate for its approval first.

          ATS:  Et iterum.  The draft reports often have errors in the recorded votes or what have you, and MUST be put before the Senate before being posted to the ML...unless you want to revise, and revise, and revise until no one knows who said what.  

      Optime valete,

      Cato

      P.S. - they're saying we may get two feet (.75m) of snow in the city!  Hooray!  GEC

          ATS:  And we haven’t had a flake from this one.  Nyah, nyah, nyah!  NYC could use a good washing.  ;-)  We may have to lend you our snowplows, though they may get detailed to Maryland and DC...


      Vale, et valete.  

      --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com <mailto:Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com> , "rory12001" <rory12001@...> wrote:
      >
      >
      >
      > Maior Scholasticae spd;
      >
      > Scholastica, allow me to point out that this is plebeian business and you are a patrician. It really is inappropriate for patricians to interfere in our affairs. Though I can appreciate your desire for vetting, but that time has passed. The plebs' rights to be informed come first
      >
      > I look forward to Dexter's report. It's good to see the tribunes ensuring the plebs traditional rights.
      >              May all enjoy the Saturnalia!
      >                 bene vale in pacem Saturni   
      >                       Maior

       

      Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72691 From: rory12001 Date: 2009-12-20
      Subject: Re: Last report of the Senate session.
      Maior Dextro Scholasticaque spd;
      je suis sur votre compte-rendu serait fort amusant;-)
      a bas les patriciens!
      Maior


      > >
      > >
      > > A. Tullia Scholastica C. Equitio Catoni M. Hortensiae Majori C. Petronio
      > > Dextro quiritibus bonae voluntatis S.P.D.
      > >
      > >
      > > Cato Maiori Peronio Dextero Tulliae Scholasticae SPD
      > >
      > > Let me please point out that the business of the Senate is the business of the
      > > Respublica.
      > >
      > > ATS: I agree. This is NOT purely a plebeian matter at all. If it were,
      > > the Senate reports might find their way to the CPT list, and nowhere else.
      > >
      > > The Senate's prerogative to correct any mistakes in an official report of its
      > > activities is paramount as the supreme policy-making body of the State. The
      > > "time" has certainly not "passed" for a correct report to be prepared and
      > > issued.
      > >
      > > ATS: Again, I agree. Better late than never...but it must be correct.
      > >
      > > Petronius Dexter, I fully support your quite correct desire to get this report
      > > issued, but I urge you, as someone who has shown a strong declared desire for
      > > proper action, to submit your report first - in accordance with historic
      > > practice - to the Senate for its approval first.
      > >
      > > ATS: Et iterum. The draft reports often have errors in the recorded
      > > votes or what have you, and MUST be put before the Senate before being posted
      > > to the ML...unless you want to revise, and revise, and revise until no one
      > > knows who said what.
      > >
      > > Optime valete,
      > >
      > > Cato
      > >
      > > P.S. - they're saying we may get two feet (.75m) of snow in the city! Hooray!
      > > GEC
      > >
      > > ATS: And we haven¹t had a flake from this one. Nyah, nyah, nyah! NYC
      > > could use a good washing. ;-) We may have to lend you our snowplows, though
      > > they may get detailed to Maryland and DC...
      > >
      > >
      > > Vale, et valete.
      > >
      > > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com <mailto:Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com> ,
      > > "rory12001" <rory12001@> wrote:
      > >> >
      > >> >
      > >> >
      > >> > Maior Scholasticae spd;
      > >> >
      > >> > Scholastica, allow me to point out that this is plebeian business and you
      > >> are a patrician. It really is inappropriate for patricians to interfere in
      > >> our affairs. Though I can appreciate your desire for vetting, but that time
      > >> has passed. The plebs' rights to be informed come first
      > >> >
      > >> > I look forward to Dexter's report. It's good to see the tribunes ensuring
      > >> the plebs traditional rights.
      > >> > May all enjoy the Saturnalia!
      > >> > bene vale in pacem Saturni
      > >> > Maior
      > >
      > >
      >
      Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72692 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2009-12-20
      Subject: Re: Last report of the Senate session.
      Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: Last report of the Senate session.

       
       A. Tullia Scholastica iterum C. Petronio Dextro quiritibus bonae voluntatis S.P.D.
         

      C. Petronius A. Tulliae Scholasticae s.p.d.,

      > ATS:  I am glad that the report is being prepared at last.  However, it is customary for the tribunes to post the reports to the senate as drafts BEFORE sending them to the public lists.  Please give us the opportunity to correct any errors before posting them publicly.<

      Being not English it is manifeste that it will be errors and mistakes into this report but, as the "Journal Officiel" in France, I mostly verbatim copied the arguments and the words given by senators. I give sometimes my own reflexions but not about the items themselves more about some things which amazing me.

          ATS2:  Senatoribus interdum necesse est aliqua errata de suffragiis, commentariis, etc.,  corrigere.  Praeterea, si te recté intellegam, addidisti commentaria tua, quod numquam antea factum est, et paene sine dubio non licet.  Melius sit si errata linguistica quoque corrigamus.  


      I followed the Lex Moravia de renuntiatione Senatus actorum, better in my opinion, Lex Moravia de actis Senatus referrendis, and it is not a custom very interesting to submit his report to the knowledge of the Senate before its publishing. But, I sent a draft to my colleagues Tribunes of the Plebs.

          ATS2:  But it is the Senators who must correct their own comments, votes, etc., if needed, not your tribunician colleagues.  We may have to fix l’Anglais, too.  

      >>> As you know, Consul Severus has posted a preliminary version in the senate, but there are some additions and a subtraction or two to be made (quid fieri...) before publishing this.<<<

      I did not take example on this consular reporting, more a indicator board than an article of the "Journal Officiel",

          ATS2:  It’s just a skeleton, minus commentaries, but better than nothing.  Et tabulam optime factam habet, sed verba rogantia suffragia ubique apparent:  quid fieri...


      but I followed the example of the reporting on July by the tribune Appius Galerius Aurelianus.

      I put my own touch with the names' abbreviations. Some of you shall be astonished but I like to be astonishing.

          ATS2:  It might be better to be less astonishing now and again.  We aren’t doing French poetry or elegant prose of any sort in the Senate.  Je le regrette, mais Monsieur Cicéron n’est pas chez nous.  Au lieu des orateurs, nous avons quelques marins ivres.  

          As for the time this would take, typically it is only a couple or three days, but due to the holiday and the storm in several of our heavily-populated states, it might be best to wait for the full report, and simply give the results:  which items passed, and what the vote total was.  

      Optime vale.

      C. Petronius Dexter
      Tribunus Plebis

      Optime vale!

       
         

      Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72693 From: petronius_dexter Date: 2009-12-20
      Subject: Re: Last report of the Senate session.
      C. Petronius Tulliae Scholasticae et C. Catoni s.p.d.,

      About what do you are afraid? It is a reporting and I completely followed the Lex Moravia.

      > ATS: I agree. This is NOT purely a plebeian matter at all. If it were, the Senate reports might find their way to the CPT list, and nowhere else.

      It is not purely a plebeian matter, but it is purely a Tribune Plebis matter. The consuls as magistrates convening, in despite the proposition of Modianus, did not publish this report in the Forum Romanum. Hon. consul Iulius Severus made a report in form of indicator board only on the Senate list. And as said hon. consul Severus as presiding magistrate of the last Senate session, he informed the Senate of the voting results, hoping that the new Tribunes of the Plebs will inform the People of Nova Roma.

      The "new Tribunes" he said.

      So I will inform the People of Nova Roma with this complete reporting of the last Senate meeting. In accordance with the duties of a tribune of the Plebs and following the Lex Moravia.

      > ATS: Again, I agree. Better late than never...but it must be correct.

      If there are errors, these errors will be the Senators' ones. A reporting is a reporting.

      > ATS: Et iterum. The draft reports often have errors in the recorded votes or what have you, and MUST be put before the Senate before being posted to the ML...unless you want to revise, and revise, and revise until no one knows who said what.

      My reporting of this session is clear. The votes are always written "quadratis litteris" "VTI ROGAS" or "ANTIQVO" after the initials of the voter. If he comments his vote, I copy his comment in small letters after the vote. Except in your case. Because you vote after your comment. But your votes are written "quadratis litteris" too.

      I collected the votes during the voting period before it is ended. In the example of Hortensia Maior I took the "vote corrected". Etc...

      As no one comment was "confidential nature" I am not concerned by the point "e" of the law:
      "e. If the Senate has voted on an item which is of a confidential nature (for example the dismissal of a citizen) for the protection of the citizen(s) in question the reporting Tribune should confer with the Senate as to what details of the discussion/comments/voting should be reported to the citizens."

      So if my report is mistaken, it is perhaps about the number of senators. I have counted 30 senators + 1 ex.magistrate having the right to vote. And I reported his proxy votes given by the senator Palladius.

      Optime vale.

      C. Petronius Dexter
      Tribunus Plebis
      Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72694 From: petronius_dexter Date: 2009-12-20
      Subject: Re: Last report of the Senate session.
      Dexter Maiori s.p.d.,

      > Je suis sur votre compte-rendu serait fort amusant;-)
      > a bas les patriciens!

      Ce fut un vrai travail de Romain.
      Ad verbum translation: "It was a mere work of Roman". The idea, the meaning is that was a hard work.

      I did not have fun in collecting your votes. The Senate list, and yahoo groups in general, is not easy to be sure that nothing is forgotten. As some senators wrote since the beginning a title of topic "Votes of...", "Discessiones" or something like that I found votes during many years of the same senator... I was afraid to lose a vote. Each senator did not open a topic and some votes are following votes of another session or another senator in the same topic.

      So it was important to me to know the voters registered, id est all the members of the Senate. In order to avoid forgetting one of them. But I was affraid to do not find this list of Patres Conscripti before the vote.

      So, you have never sure that you have collected all the votes. I have some ideas to make this collect more easy. Before voting, the convening magistrate could be given in the call to order the list of senators called to vote, it is very interesting to know at what time the sun is rising in Rome, but, in my opinion, it is more efficient to give the entire list of the voters before the vote.

      Optime vale.
      C. Petronius Dexter



      Optime vale.
      C. Petronius Dexter
      Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72695 From: marcushoratius Date: 2009-12-20
      Subject: a. d. XIII Kalendas Ianuarias: Bisaltia, Vitellius, and Vespasian
      M. Moravius Piscinus Horatianus Quiritibus et omnibus salutem plurimam dicit: Io Saturnalia! Io Triumphe!

      Hodie est ante diem XIII Kalendas Ianuarias; haec dies comitialis est: feriae Opi ad forum

      Ay, ere the reign of Dicte's king, ere men,
      Waxed godless, banqueted on slaughtered bulls,
      Such life on earth did golden Saturn lead.
      Nor ear of man had heard the war-trump's blast,
      Nor clang of sword on stubborn anvil set.

      ~ Vergil, Georgic 2.536-540


      Bisaltia saves Calpurnius

      "Calpurnius Crassus, one of the noblemen who had campaqigned with Regulus, was dispatched against the Massylians to sack a certain stronghold by name Garaetium, a place difficult to capture. He was taken captive and was destined to be sacrificed to Saturnus; but Bisaltia, daughter of the king, fell in love with him, betrayed her father, and gave her lover the victory. But when he returned home, the maiden slew herself. So Hesianax in the third book of his Libyan History." ~ Pseudo-Plutarch, Parallela Minora 23


      AUC 822 / 69 CE: Death of Vitellius

      "Vitellius in his fear put on a ragged and filthy tunic and concealed himself in a dark room where dogs were kept, intending to escape during the night to Tarracina and there join his brother. But the soldiers sought and found him; for naturally he could not go entirely unrecognized very long after having been emperor. They seized him, covered as he was with rubbish and blood (for he had been bitten by the dogs), and tearing off his tunic they bound his hands behind his back and put a rope round his neck. And thus they led down from the palace the Caesar who had reveled there; along the Sacred Way they dragged the emperor who had often paraded past in his chair of state, and they conducted the Augustus to the Forum, where he had often addressed the people. Some buffeted him, some plucked at his beard; all mocked him, all insulted him, making comments especially upon his riotous living, since he had a protuberant belly. When, in shame at this treatment, he lowered his gaze, the soldiers would prick him under the chin with their daggers, in order to make him look up even against his will. A German who witnessed this could not endure it, but taking pity on him cried: "I will help you in the only way that I can." Thereupon he wounded Vitellius and slew himself. How, Vitellius did not die of the wound, but was dragged to the prison, as were also his statues, while many jests and many opprobrious remarks were made about them. Finally, grieved to the heart at what he had suffered and what he had been hearing, he cried: "And yet I was once our emperor." At that the soldiers became enraged and led him to the Stairway, where they struck him down. Then they cut off his head and carried it about all over the city." ~ Dio Cassius 64.20-21


      AUC 822 / 69 CE: Vespasianus declared Emperor

      "Such was the course of these events; and following them Vespasian was declared emperor by the senate also, and Titus and Domitian were given the title of Caesars. The consular office was assumed by Vespasian and Titus while the former was in Egypt and the latter in Palestine. Now portents and dreams had come to Vespasian pointing to the sovereignty long beforehand. Thus, as he was eating dinner on his country estate, where most of his time was spent, an ox approached him, knelt down and placed his head beneath his feet. On another occasion, when he was also eating, a dog dropped a human hand under the table. And a conspicuous cypress tree, which had been uprooted and overthrown by a violent wind, stood upright again on the following day by its own power and continued to flourish. From a dream he learned that when Nero Caesar should lose a tooth, he himself should be emperor. This prophecy about the tooth became a reality on the following day; and Nero himself in his dreams once thought that he had brought the car of Jupiter to Vespasian's house. These portents needed interpretation; but not so the saying of a Jew named Josephus: he, having earlier been captured by Vespasian and imprisoned, laughed and said: 'You may imprison me now, but a year from now, when you have become emperor, you will release me.'" ~ Dio Cassius 65.1


      AUC 815 / 62 BCE: Jesus ben Ananais

      Titus was still in Palestine conducting the siege of Jerusalem when his father became emperor. Portents of the fall of Jerusalem began to appear as many reported seeing armies and chariots circling in the sky. Then, within the inner sanctum of the temple a loud voice was heard giving a dire warning. There is also the interesting tale of how, four years before the Jewish revolt began, a propher foretold of the destruction of the Jewish temple and the capture of Jerusalem.

      "An incident more alarming still had occurred four years earlier before the war at a time of exceptional peace and prosperity for the city. One Jesus, son of Ananais, a very ordinary yokel, came to the feast (of Sukkoth) at which every Jew is expected to set up a tabernacle for God. As he stood in the Temple he suddenly began to shout, 'A voice from the east, a voice from the west, a voice from the four winds, a voice against Jerusalem and the Sanctuary, a voice against bridegrooms and brides, a voice against the whole people.' Day and night he uttered this cry as he went through all the streets. Some of the more prominent citizens, very annoyed at the ominbous words, laid hold of the fellow and beat him savagely. Without saying a word in his own defence or for the private information of his persecutors, he persisted in shouting the same warning as before. The Jewish authorities, rightly concluding that some supernatural force was responsible for the man's behavior, took him before the Roman procurator. There, though scourged till his flesh hung in ribbons, he neither begged for mercy nor shed a tear, but lowering his voice to the most mournful tones answered every blow with 'Woe to Jerusalem!' When Albinus – for that was the procurator's name – demanded to know who he was, where he came from and why he uttered such cries, he made no reply whatever to the questions but endlessly repeated his lament over the city, until Albinus decided that he was a madman and released him, All the time until the war broke out he never approached another citizen or was seen in conversation, but daily as if he had learnt a prayer by heart he recited his lament; 'Woe to Jerusalem!' Those who daily cursed him he never cursed; those who gave him food he never thanked: his only response to anyone was that dismal foreboding. His voice was heard most of all at the feasts. For seven years and five months he went on ceaselessly, his voice as strong as ever and his vigour unabated, until during the siege after seeing the fulfilment of his foreboding he was silenced. He was going round on the wall uttering his piercing cry: 'Woe again to the City, to the people, and the Sanctuary!' and as he added a last word, 'Woe to me also!' a stone shot from an engine struck him, killing him instantly. Thus he uttered those same forebodingss to the very end." ~ Flavius Josephus, The Jewish War 6.300-309


      Our thought for today comes from Sextus, Selected Sentences 5:

      "You have in yourself some thing similar to God, and therefore use yourself as the temple of God, on account of that which in you resembles God."
      Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72696 From: Gaius Petronius Dexter Date: 2009-12-20
      Subject: Reporting of the Results of November Senate Meeting.
      C. Petronius Dexter tribunus Plebis Plebeis Quiritibus et Populo Novo Romano s.p.d.,
       
      Here is the Tribunician reporting of the last Senate's session on November/December 2762 auc. This reporting is late, but it is the victim of an agenda during which the former tribunes could publish the agenda but less the reporting of the session itself and the voting results, because at the same time it was the election fot tribunes of the Plebs. It is my first experience of reporting a Senate session, and a session in which I did not sit. So I collected the votes and the comments of the voters around the Senate list.
       
      So, people of Nova Roma, I inform you by this report about the last Senate session and its votes. Good reading.
       
      The Senate contio began at the second hour (08.30 hrs. CET) on Saturday, 28 November 2762, with discussions to continue until approximately
      the end of the day (16.00 hrs CET) on Tuesday, December 1st, 2762.
      Voting began in the first hour at 07.30 hrs CET on Wednesday, December 2nd, 2762 and concluded at 16.00 hrs CET on Thursday December 3rd, 2762.
       
      The following (XXIV) senators cast votes and referred to below by the initials:
       
      Consules:
      [MIS] M. Iulius Severus
      [MCC] M. Curatius Complutensis
       
      Princeps Senatus:
      [KFBQ] K. Fabius Buteo Quintilianus 
       
      Censorii:
      [CnEM] Cn. Equitius Marinus
      [DIPI] D. Iunius Palladius Invictus
      [CFD] C. Flavius Diocletianus
      [KFBM] K. Fabius Buteo Modianus
       
      Consulares:
      [MMPH] M. Moravius Piscinus Horatianus
      [TiGP] Ti. Galerius Paulinus
      [QFM] Q. Fabius Maximus
      [TIS] T. Iulius Sabinus
       
      Praetorii:
      [MAM] M. Arminius Maior
      [CEC] C. Equitius Cato
      [ATS] A. Tullia Scholastica 
       
      Aedilicii:
      [PMA] P. Memmius Albucius
      [MHM] M. Hortensia Maior
      [EmCF] Em. Curia Finnica
      [CCS] C. Curius Saturninus 
       
      Tribunicii:
      [QSP] Q. Suetonius Paulinus
      [FGA] Fl. Galerius Aurelianus 
      [CVP] C. Vipsanius Agrippa 
       
      Quaestorii:
      [CnIC] Cn. Iulius Caesar
      [PVSV] P. Vitellius Stephanus Venator
      [EqIL] Equestria Iunia Laeca  
       

      The following senator and the ex-consul have both voted by proxy:
      [MLA] M. Lucretius Agricola
      [MMA] M. Minucius Audens*
      * Ex-consul can vote according to the lex Popillia Senatoria.

      The following senatores (V) did not vote:
      [CMM] C. Marius Merullus
      [LCSF] L. Cornelius Sulla Felix
      [FrAC] Fr. Apulus Caesar
      [MIP] M. Iulius Perusianus
      [ArnMA] Arn. Moravia Aurelia
       
      NB: I did not found in the Nova Roman Senate votes an Album Senatorum with all the names of the senators registered. As meant the calling "Patres Conscripti". So, perhaps I was mistaken in giving you the above list of senators taken on NRWiki. Actually the calling of Senate voting is very precise on its agenda, you know for example by this agenda at what time sun rises on Rome, but it is saddly silent on the names and number of voters registered. I also made a comparation with the names of the senators given in the report of July, in which I found the same senators except A. Tullius Marcellus Cato who recently resigned. So in July we had 32 senators, today we have 30 senators on NRWiki, but 31 voters counting the voter by proxy M. Minucius Audens. So 2/3 of 30 senators is 20, not 22 as I read on the Senate yahoogroup into the consular reporting.
       
      "VTI ROGAS" indicates a vote in favor of an item,
      "ANTIQVO" is a vote against,
      "ABSTINEO" is an open abstention.
       
      And now....

      RELATIO:
       
      Quod bonum felixque sit populo Novo Romano Quiritibus, referimus ad vos, Patres et Matres conscriptos:
       
      Item I.
       
      Senatus Consultum Ultimum on the Tribunes of the Plebs.
       
      The Senate resolves that the Consuls may suspend the Constitutional requirement
      for all magistrates to take office on 1 January 2010 in order for the Tribunes
      of the Plebs to take office on 10 December 2009 in accordance with ancient
      practice.
       
      This Senatus Consultum Ultimum shall expire on 2 January 2010.
       
      The Senate strongly encourages next year's Consuls to promulgate a
      Constitutional amendment stipulating that the various magistrates take office on
      the days established by historical practice.
       
      Item I PASSED.
      VTI ROGAS : XXI.
      ANTIQVO :  0
      ABSTINEO : IV
       
      Consules.
      [MIS]: VTI ROGAS. 
      [MCC]:VTI ROGAS. 
       
      Princeps Senatus.
      [KFBQ]: VTI ROGAS. I certainly support this unusual measure in this case.
       
      Censorii.
      [CnEM]: VTI ROGAS
      [DIPI]: ABSTINEO. 
      [CFD]: ABSTINEO. 
      [KFBM]: VTI ROGAS. I don't think this is necessary and believe that those senatores who have been calling for it are simply interested in causing trouble.  If this will silence them then so be it.
       
      Consulares.
      [MMPH]: ASSENTIOR VTI ROGAS. It has always been the intention of the Senate to move Nova Roma closer to the traditions of the Res Publica of Roma antiqua. This is an evolving process. While a Tribunus Plebis I originated the lex that had our Tribuni Plebis enter office on 10 December as was done in the latter part of the Old Republic, not only for historical reasons but also to deal with a problem that had occurred the year prior. The measure still serves both purposes and thus I support this senatus consultum and the proposal to amend the Constitution.
       
      [TiGP]: VTI ROGAS. We all need to a better job of reading proposed laws before we discover they are flawed after they have been enacted.
       
      [QFM]:VTI ROGAS.
      [TIS]: VTI ROGAS.
       
      Praetorii.
      [MAM]: VTI ROGAS.  
      [CEC]: Did not cast his vote on its item.
      [ATS]: ASSENTIOR VTI ROGAS. 
       
      Aedilicii.
      [PMA]: VTI ROGAS. 
      Sen. Paulinus has well underlined during his electoral campaign the need that the practice we adopted a few years ago be more respectful of the  text of our constitution. I thank both consuls for having dealt with this matter quick, so that our elected tribunes may enter in office inside a correct legal frame. As consul electus, I intend, with my colleague, to submit our institutions the question on the matter (are the tribunes Plebis to enter in office on Dec. 10 or on Jan. 1?) and a relevant text during our 2763 auc term.

      [MHM]: VTI ROGAS. 
      [EmCF]: VTI ROGAS. 
      [CCS]: VTI ROGAS. 
       
      Tribunicii.
      [QSP]: VTI ROGAS. 
      [FGA]: VTI ROGAS.  
      [CVP]: VTI ROGAS.
       
      Quaestorii:
      [CnIC]: ABSTINEO. 
      [PVSV]: Ita = VTI ROGAS. 
      [EqIL]: VTI ROGAS.  
       
      Proxy.
      [MLA]: VTI ROGAS. 
      [MMA]: Abstain = ABSTINEO. 
       
      -----------------------------------------------------
       
      Quod bonum felixque sit populo Novo Romano Quiritibus, referimus ad vos, Patres et Matres conscriptos:
       
      Item II.
       
      Approval of the Lex Curiatia Iulia de institutis publicis religiosis passed by
      the Comitia Centuriata.
       
      By this Lex Curiatia Iulia de institutis publicis religiosis the Constitution,
      Article VI, on Public Religious Institutions, is hereby replaced by the
      following Article VI.
       
      a.- The Religio Romana, defined as the traditional worship of the Gods and
      Goddesses of Rome, shall be the official religion of Nova Roma.
       
      b.- The sacerdotal responsibilities for the State Religion of Nova Roma shall be
      invested primarily into the Collegium Pontificum and the Collegium Augurum.
       
      1. The Collegium Pontificum shall consist of the Rex and Regina Sacrorum, the
      Flamens, Flaminicas, Pontifices, and the Sacerdotes Vestales, co-opted by the
      Collegium Pontificum itself, under its own governing rules. The Collegium
      Pontificum shall be responsible for the conduct and administration of all public
      religious ceremonies other than those rites assigned to the Augurs. To that
      purpose, the Collegium Pontificum may create sacerdotal offices, sodalitates,
      and collegia.
       
      2. The Collegium Augurum shall consist of all public Augurs who are co-opted by
      the Collegium Augurum itself, under its own governing rules. The individual
      members of the Collegium Augurium shall be responsible for instructing and
      advising curule magistrates on performing auspicia on behalf of Nova Roma. In
      other religious ceremonies the Augures shall perform their traditional
      responsibilities. The Collegium Augurum may create sacerdotal offices and
      sodalitates that are specifically related to the conduct and administration of
      its responsibilities.
       
      C. Additional sacerdotal collegia may be instituted and their rules set by the
      Collegium Pontificum, with the approval of the Comitia Centuriata.
       
      Item II FAILED.
      VTI ROGAS: XVI.
      ANTIQVO:  VIII.
      ABSTINEO : II.
       
      Consules.
      [MIS]: VTI ROGAS. 
      [MCC]:VTI ROGAS. 
       
      Princeps Senatus.
      [KFBQ]: VTI ROGAS. This change is well needed by the Religio.
       
      Censorii.
      [CnEM]: VTI ROGAS.
      [DIPI]: ANTIQVO. I abstained on this item last time but vote no this time since it has already been rejected. I have no strong feelings against it but am voting against this procedurally. It failed to meet muster in the Senate, the process should begin again.
       
      [CFD]: ANTIQVO. 
      [KFBM]: VTI ROGAS.
       
      Consulares.
      [MMPH]:  ASSENTIOR VTI ROGAS. For the same reasons as I stated above, while Consul I first proposed this measure to meet both historical example and to deal with issues in our own Res Publica Libera today. I fully support the amendment to the Constitution that enables our Collegium Pontificum and Collegium Augurum to move forward.
      [TiGP]: ANTIQVO. As has already been pointed out you only get one bite at the apple. If this had passed the first time would anybody think it was ok to being it back for a vote, time and time again, until it had a majority to defeat it? This passed the Comitia Centuriata but was defeated in the Senate. It needs to be reenacted by the Comitia Centuriata and then presented to the Senate again. 
       
      [QFM]: ANTIQVO. It failed once. The Assembly must reissue the request.
       
      [TIS]: VTI ROGAS.

       
      Praetorii.
      [MAM]: VTI ROGAS. 
      [CEC]: ANTIQVO. Badly-written and already defeated. Let the People vote on a law with this proposal's benefits but without its serious flaws.
       
      [ATS]: ASSENTIOR VTI ROGAS.
       
      Aedilicii.
      [PMA]: VTI ROGAS. This adopted law is an improvement of the organization our religious institutions.
       
      [MHM]: VTI ROGAS. This is the will of the people! those senators who frustrate the Quirites' will; the CP and College of Augurs attempt to be more flexible to advance the cultus deorum, are simply against the Pax Deorum & should change their votes!
       
      [EmCF]: VTI ROGAS.
      [CCS]: VTI ROGAS. 
       
      Tribunicii:
      [QSP]: Abstain = ABSTINEO. 
      [FGA]: VTI ROGAS.  
      [CVP]: ANTIQVO. 
       
      Quaestorii.
      [CnIC]: ANTIQVO. This was already voted down by the Senate, and that vote meant the matter should have died. The only legal way to resurrect this proposal (that is all it is now having originally been rejected by the Senate) in my opinion is to start the whole legislative process again and put the matter once more to the people, and then if it passes return it to the Senate.
       
      [PVSV]: Negatio = ANTIQVO. 
      [EqIL]: VTI ROGAS.  
       
      Proxy:
      [MLA]: VTI ROGAS. 
      [MMA]: Abstain = ABSTINEO.
       
      While there are 16 votes "Yes", 8 votes "No"and 2 abstained, according to the Constitution the majority required is 2/3 of the senators, id est were exspected 20 votes "Yes" at least in order to modify the Article VI of the Constitution. With 16 "Vti Rogas" it is not enough, so the Item II failed.
       
      --------------------------------------------------------------------------
       
      Quod bonum felixque sit populo Novo Romano Quiritibus, referimus ad vos, Patres et Matres conscriptos:
       
      Item III.
       
      Approval of the Sodalitas proDIIS - A temple for the Gods in Rome.
       
      The Senate of Nova Roma decides hereby to make the Sodalitas proDIIS - A temple
      for the Gods in Rome an officially promoted project and sodalitas of Nova Roma.
      The project is open for the ideas, and the support, of all citizens of Nova Roma
      and for everyone willing to support this project for the Glory of our Roman
      Gods. A detailed business plan for this Sodalitas was sent by the Consuls to the
      Senate mail list files.
       
      Item III PASSED.
      VTI ROGAS: XXIV.
      ANTIQVO:  II.
      ABSTINEO: 0
       
      Consules.
      [MIS]: VTI ROGAS. 
      [MCC]:VTI ROGAS. 
       
      Princeps Senatus.
      [KFBQ]: VTI ROGAS. With the same provisions noted by Senator Albucius for concurrence on the part of the Collegium Pontificum.
       
      Censorii.
      [CnEM]: VTI ROGAS. With the same provisions noted by Senator Albucius for concurrence on the part of the Collegium Pontificum.
       
      [DIPI]: VTI ROGAS. With all my heart do I approve this worthy project.
       
      [CFD]: VTI ROGAS.  
      [KFBM]: VTI ROGAS. As I have mentioned before this really should be approved by the Collegium Pontificum; however, since I would vote in favor of it within the CP I will show my support here. I have been supportive of this cause since it's inception and support it still.
       
      Consulares.
      [MMPH]: ASSENTIOR VTI ROGAS.
      I have supported this project since its inception. The intended project is larger than any sodalitas may handle on its own. Indeed it may require Nova Roma to work with other organizations to achieve its goal, which shall benefit all practitioners of the religio Romana. And in that I am glad that Nova Roma will provide the initiative needed to restore a place for the Di Romani in Roma where all cultores Deorum Populi Romani shall be welcomed. Initium est dimidium facti.
       
      [TiGP]: ANTIQVO. I have already stated that I support this project but once again it should not be on the agenda. This should be rewritten as a sense of the Senate resolution stating that the Senate supports the project but leaves the approval of the Sodalitas to the Collegium. This is what the law requires.
       
      [QFM]: VTI ROGAS. 
      [TIS]: VTI ROGAS. 
       
      Praetorii.
      [MAM]: VTI ROGAS. 
      [CEC]: ANTIQVO. It should be going to the College of Pontiffs for approval, according to the law. I am surprised that those who continually call upon faithfulness to the law *and* recognition of the prerogatives of the pontiffs are suddenly lining up to violate both.
       
      [ATS]: Not without some reservations concerning the propriety of the Senate
      dealing with religious matters rather than the CP, but ASSENTIOR VTI ROGAS.
       
      Aedilicii.
      [PMA]:VTI ROGAS. With the formal condition of the second paragraph below.
      Censor Modianus has been right reminding us the text of lex Cassia de creatione sodalitatum. As consul electus, I intend to propose reviewing this field. The notion of a sodalitas being "a part of Nova Roma" is not clear and may drive us to oppose what could be the right of every Roman, to create a sodalitas and a collegium inside our Republic. We might, at the same time and in close collaboration with the religious colleges, examine what is a "religious" group etc., being considered that religion is by essence a part of Roman life and institutions. Last, we might at this time work on a difference between ordinary colleges etc. and those which requested the support of NR, under a given form to be studied.
      In what is thus for me an intermediary context, not sending a positive signal to working and active citizens in their work enhancing what could result in an ambitious real project would be counterproductive.
      In order that this work be as efficient as possible, I ask however, if this item is adopted, the praeses collegii (current quaestor and aed. cur. electus T. Flavius Aquila, leg. pp. Germaniae), to request, formally and with no delay, all needed advices from the Pontifex Maximus, as representative of our religious collegia.
       
      [MHM]: VTI ROGAS.A great undertaking; it has my total support. 
      [EmCF]: VTI ROGAS. 
      [CCS]: VTI ROGAS. As our pontifex maximus approves this approach.
       
      Tribunicii.
      [QSP]: VTI ROGAS. A worthy project long overdue. 
      [FGA]: VTI ROGAS.  
      [CVP]: VTI ROGAS.
       
      Quaestorii.
      [CnIC]: VTI ROGAS. A worthy enterprise. 
       
      [PVSV]: Ita = VTI ROGAS. 
      [EqIL]: VTI ROGAS.  
       
      Proxy.
      [MLA]: VTI ROGAS. 
      [MMA]: VTI ROGAS.
       
      --------------------------------------------------------------
       
      Quod bonum felixque sit populo Novo Romano Quiritibus, referimus ad vos, Patres et Matres conscriptos:
       
      Item IV.
       
      Approval of new Senate rules
       
      In recent times the Senate list has been becoming a tacky place for discussion,
      where everybody seems to feel authorized to attack and insult everybody. To
      avoid this situation, the Consuls propose the establishment of some minimum
      standards:
       
      a) The Senate list must be under the moderation control of the Consuls.
       
      b) The Contio will be moderated. Each Senator shall have her or his
      respective turns for speech and replies according to the traditions followed in
      ancient Rome, so nobody can monopolize the Senate rostrum and become the center
      of all debates.
       
      c) The Senate list will be closed between sessions. If the Senatores would
      like to discuss Nova Roma matters, they can do this in private or in other
      forums.
       
      d) Discussions will be not allowed during the voting time.
       
      Off topic messages during contio or voting time will be rejected.
       
      Item IV PASSED.
      VTI ROGAS: XIV.
      ANTIQVO:  XI.
      ABSTINEO: I.
       
      Consules.
      [MIS]: VTI ROGAS. 
      [MCC]:VTI ROGAS. 
       
      Princeps Senatus.
      [KFBQ]: VTI ROGAS. Some balanced rules are needed to give the senate good working conditions. These new rules seems to be able gives us that.
       
      Censorii.
      [CnEM]: VTI ROGAS.
      [DIPI]: ABSTINEO. This version is far better than those presented before so I will not stand in its way but I will not vote for it either as I see no pressing need for it. I have no objection to some form of moderation but see no reason to close the senate list. The current list has served us well enough. I hope the new non-historical senaculum list (ok, the senate list is non-historical too, there are no senate chambers but let's not belabor the obvious) will be mandatory so the board of directors can still communicate freely. It was rather amusing to see historicity as a reason for a new list but no actual examples of historical precedent were presented and those presented by Maior actually opposed her position. No surprise there of course.
       
      [CFD]: ANTIQVO. 
      [KFBM]: VTI ROGAS. I am saddened that this sort of rule is necessary.  I would rather see undesirable elements within the senate thrown out instead of having to resort to more rules, but will support this change for now.
       
      Consulares.
      [MMPH]: ASSENTIOR VTI ROGAS. The Senate has serious matters to consider, requiring that its sessions work effectively towards resolutions. For that we need some rules to keep our focus on the issues. While some have voiced their opposition to any rules as a curtailment of their free speech, and others shall protest that this measure does not go far enough to ensure orderly debate, I think that there is a certain balance in the final version that offers us a working enviroment needed for our discourses.
        
      [TiGP]: ANTIQVO. As I said before. For over ten years this Senate list has been open between sessions for any Senator to bring before this body any subject that a Senator may choose to address. The items discussed still must make their way on to the Consuls agenda before a formal vote can be taken. If it is a good idea it usual does, if not, not.  I believe that an open Senate list  has served us well in all of this time and I am firmly against this proposal in its entirety.
      If an individual Senator or a group of Senators do not want to receive messages between sessions they can simply change their own Yahoo setting for this list to digest only. Those Senators who wish to discuss an item would be free to do so. 
      Nova Roma needs more free and open discussions not less.  During a formal session of the Senate the Consuls get to invite anybody they like to address this house and they set the agenda. Those Senators  who wish to remain after a session to discuss whatever should be allowed to do so.  By keeping this list open we have a permanent record of these informal discussions and can use these to determine if a given idea has merit or not. The Consuls are already moderators of this list per an agreement made during Censor Modianus Consulship on list ownership and moderation. The Senate list should remain under the ownership and lead moderation of the Censors as the Consuls have enough to do and enough power over this house as it is. The moderation of this house by the Censors, with the occasional assistance of the Consuls is one more check and balance within our system. 
      I see no need to change what has worked for over ten years. For the record, both public and private, I have to add that I believe this recommendation of the Consuls is one more grab for power and another effort to silence anybody who has an opinion different than theirs.
      It should also be noted that this is the first pair of Consuls in Nova Roman history to have ask for the ability to silence the Senate in their own
      house.  Consuls like Modianus and myself never asked for it.  Consuls dealing with a civil war back in 1998 did not request it. For ten years no
      other Consuls have asked for this.
      I respectfully ask that ALL Senators vote against this measure for the freedom of speech you save today will be your own.
       
      [QFM]: ANTIQVO. What has suited us for ten years needs to be changed?  Why?
       
      [TIS]:VTI ROGAS. 
       
      Praetorii.
      [MAM]: ANTIQVO. 
      [CEC]: ANTIQVO. Nothing in ancient practice suggests or requires this kind of suppression of free speech. It is abhorrent to a free people.
       
      [ATS]: This is a vast improvement over the earlier proposals, though I still see no reason why this list should be closed in between sessions and another one established. With considerable reservations, however, I shall vote to approve it.  Clearly some here need external control as they are unable to supply the internal version. ASSENTIOR VTI ROGAS.
       
      Aedilicii.
      [PMA]: VTI ROGAS.
      Thanks to consul Severus wiseness and work, the proposed text offers us a resonable frame with guarantees a fair balance between the need that our Senate keep free, even tough, discussions and the improvement in having us working as efficiently as possible on the proposed items by  the presiding magistrate.
      Outside the sessions, we have, like our Ancients, several possibilities to discuss inside whatever frames we would wish to use: the political fight may be carried on in our fora or private debates, and the collegia or private places may welcome useful exchanges, 'think tanks' etc..
       
      [MHM]: VTI ROGAS. The Senate list is impossible, dominated by the innumerable rantings of a few bullies. The Senaculum would siphon this off & is utterly historical. And insures free speech. Having order in the Senate is historical too as was posted.
       
      [EmCF]: VTI ROGAS. 
      [CCS]: VTI ROGAS. I ask all the senators to vote for this measure. This will bring us considerably closer to ancient practices and hopefully also gurantees appropriate behaviour in the meetings of the senate. This measure has absolutely nothing to do with the freedom of speech because nothing prevents senators to send private emails or having Yahoo lists or whatever they deem necessary for discussions. I think this is a very welcome measure.
       
      Tribunicii.
      [QSP]: ANTIQVO. My views on this are pretty well reflective of what Senator Paulinus has just pointed out.
      [FGA]: ANTIQVO.  
      [CVP]: ANTIQVO. 
       
      Quaestorii.
      [CnIC]: ANTIQVO. Point {a} creates another list for no real benefit. We have a perfectly adequate list here.
      Point {b} doesn't define whether the 12 hour moderation affects the right to vote in any way. Will such messages containing votes be accepted or not. Some clarification on the extent and effect of moderation would I feel have been beneficial.
      Point {c} just repeats the current state of affairs.
       
      [PVSV]: Negatio = ANTIQVO. 
      [EqIL]: VTI ROGAS. As revised.  
       
      Proxy:
      [MLA]: VTI ROGAS. 
      [MMA]: ANTIQVO.
       
      -------------------------------------------------
       
      Optime valete.
       
      C. Petronius Dexter
      Tribunus Plebis. 
       

       
      Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72697 From: Cato Date: 2009-12-20
      Subject: Re: Last report of the Senate session.
      Cato Petronio Dextero sal.

      From what in my speech to you did you create the notion of being "afraid"? I merely asked that you follow historic practice and respect the Senate's prerogatives.

      You did not, unfortunately, and there are several quite blatant errors in grammar and speech; as you are not a native speaker of English, this is quite understandable, but these are the official (read "legal") records of the Respublica/corporation. As such, it would be better that they be presented in proper English. NB: this is *not* an "attack" of any kind on your abilities to communicate in English in an informal way, and any attempt - by anyone - to make it appear so is unacceptable and should be considered beneath contempt.

      In the future, if you need assistance in making sure that the English of your reports is correct I offer my services to you willingly to help so that this kind of occurrence will not repeat itself.

      Optime vale,

      Cato

      --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "petronius_dexter" <jfarnoud94@...> wrote:
      >
      > C. Petronius Tulliae Scholasticae et C. Catoni s.p.d.,
      >
      > About what do you are afraid? It is a reporting and I completely followed the Lex Moravia.
      Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72698 From: gaius_pompeius_marcellus Date: 2009-12-20
      Subject: Correcting an Error
      Salve Citizens,
      A few months ago I appointed Marcus Flavius Iustanus, Prefect of Regio Campus of America Medioccidentalis Superior. I was not aware I was using the wrong title. So be it known that said Marcus Flavius Iustanus is appointed Legati of his region. He shall speak with my voice in matters local to him.
      Vale,
      Gaius Pompeius Marcellus
      Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72699 From: Maxima Valeria Messallina Date: 2009-12-20
      Subject: Re: Offtopic: Bambi & Thumper [1 Attachment]
      That is such an adorable picture! Thank you, amica, for sharing it with us. :)

      --- On Fri, 12/18/09, A. Tullia Scholastica <fororom@localnet.com> wrote:

      From: A. Tullia Scholastica <fororom@localnet.com>
      Subject: [Nova-Roma] Offtopic: Bambi & Thumper [1 Attachment]
      To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
      Date: Friday, December 18, 2009, 9:39 PM

       
      A. Tullia Scholastica quiritibus, sociis, peregrinisque bonae voluntatis S.P.D.

          Recently my brother sent me several charming pictures of a real Bambi and Thumper pair.  In the spirit of the season, I am pasting a reduced version of one of them below, which I hope survives the trip.  Others show Bambi licking Thumper, and both of them nuzzling one another.  

          Fruimini!

          Valete!

        


          

      Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72700 From: Maxima Valeria Messallina Date: 2009-12-20
      Subject: Re: Last report of the Senate session.
      <<--- On Sun, 12/20/09, Cato <catoinnyc@...> wrote:
      Cato Petronio Dextero sal.

      From what in my speech to you did you create the notion of being "afraid"? I merely asked that you follow historic practice and respect the Senate's prerogatives.

      You did not, unfortunately, and there are several quite blatant errors in grammar and speech; as you are not a native speaker of English, this is quite understandable, but these are the official (read "legal") records of the Respublica/corporat ion. As such, it would be better that they be presented in proper English. NB: this is *not* an "attack" of any kind on your abilities to communicate in English in an informal way, and any attempt - by anyone - to make it appear so is unacceptable and should be considered beneath contempt.

      In the future, if you need assistance in making sure that the English of your reports is correct I offer my services to you willingly to help so that this kind of occurrence will not repeat itself.>>
       
       
      Thank you for your offer of help, but that will not be necessary as at least one of the new Tribunes is a native English speaker and I will help Dexter with his English.
       
      Vale bene in pace Deorum,
       
      Maxima Valeria Messallina
      Tribuna Plebis

      Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72701 From: petronius_dexter Date: 2009-12-20
      Subject: Re: Last report of the Senate session.
      C. Petronius Maximae Valeriae Messallinae s.p.d.,
       
      >>> Thank you for your offer of help, but that will not be necessary as at least one of the new Tribunes is a native English speaker and I will help Dexter with his English.>>>

      Exactly. I thank you very much. This report being a report late, I dared make it quicly, but in the future, in more normal situation, I am sure that we will work for the best and be sure I want to make better my English.

      Optime vale.

      C. Petronius Dexter
      Tribunus Plebis
      Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72702 From: C.Maria Caeca Date: 2009-12-20
      Subject: Re: Last report of the Senate session.
      Caeca Dextero omnibusque sal,
       
      While I can't speak to the issue of Senate editing and approval (not my purview), I do want to say that I found the posted report quite understandable.  Perhaps, since English is our working language, some minor editing can be done to smooth the language out a bit, but I had no trouble, and the "meat" of the report was satisfactory, for me, as it gave me the information I wanted.  I will admit to being curious, tough, about why you modified the initials of each Senator, just a bit.
       
      vale et valete bene,
      C. Maria Caeca
      Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72703 From: petronius_dexter Date: 2009-12-20
      Subject: Re: Last report of the Senate session.
      C. Petronius C. Catoni s.p.d.,

      > From what in my speech to you did you create the notion of being "afraid"?

      There is nothing to be embarrassed about it.

      > I merely asked that you follow historic practice and respect the Senate's prerogatives.

      Yes of course. I followed the lex Moravia and I informed the people of Nova Roma.

      If my English is not Patrician, it is not a problem, I am Plebeian. And your self-conceit about a language became "globbish" is the evidence that you do not understand that you are living the end of a way of life, id est the common language of all people not native is the death of English language of the Queen Victoria century.
      Your language bit by bit run away and escape from you.

      >>> You did not, unfortunately, and there are several quite blatant errors in grammar and speech; as you are not a native speaker of English, this is quite understandable,<<<

      Yes, Cato, but to be not English native speaker is certainly the sort of the majority in Nova Roma.

      We certainly have to use Latin. I should prefer comments in Latin in the Senate.

      >>> but these are the official (read "legal") records of the Respublica/corporation.<<<

      Yes. That is one reason I did this report expected by people.

      >>> As such, it would be better that they be presented in proper English. NB: this is *not* an "attack" of any kind on your abilities to communicate in English in an informal way, and any attempt - by anyone - to make it appear so is unacceptable and should be considered beneath contempt.<<<

      See above. Your "English" run away.

      >>> In the future, if you need assistance in making sure that the English of your reports is correct I offer my services to you willingly to help so that this kind of occurrence will not repeat itself.<<<

      Thank you very much. But I am sure that Valeria Messallina, my colleague, will help me.

      I also read that a tribune of the Plebs instead of a scriba or an accessus can appoint a viator/viatrix. So if a native English speaker wants to work with me in correcting my English, he/she can write to me.

      Optime vale.

      C. Petronius Dexter
      Tribunus Plebis
      Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72704 From: petronius_dexter Date: 2009-12-20
      Subject: Re: Last report of the Senate session.
      Dexter Caecae s.p.d.,

      >>> While I can't speak to the issue of Senate editing and approval (not my purview), I do want to say that I found the posted report quite understandable.<<<

      Thank you very much.

      >>> Perhaps, since English is our working language, some minor editing can be done to smooth the language out a bit, but I had no trouble, and the "meat" of the report was satisfactory, for me, as it gave me the information I wanted.<<<

      Yes, the most important was the votes of the senators and their comments. Of course, I did not change any word of the comments.

      >>>I will admit to being curious, tough, about why you modified the initials of each Senator, just a bit.<<<

      I preferred follow the Latin abbreviations in which C = Gaius
      and Cn = Gnaeus, Ti = Tiberius and T = Titus... I put a V at Ullerius because I prefer the "V" to the "U" as initial in Latin. But as I gave the abbreviations with the full names in the beginning of the report you can know who is who.

      Optime vale.

      C. Petronius Dexter
      Tribunus Plebis
      Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72705 From: rory12001 Date: 2009-12-20
      Subject: Re: Last report of the Senate session.
      Maior Dextro Caecae quiritbusque spd;

      it was an important session, the Collegium Pontificum wants to reform the Consitition's provisions in regard to the CP

      1. so we can be more historical and flexible,

      2.also to get rid of such weird things as the ahistorical Blasphemy law,

      The people voted 'yes' on it, 2 PM's Fl. Galerius Aurelianus, M. Moravius Piscinus want it, the CP wants it.

      and a few....(we needed 4 votes) just live to frustrate the growth and spread of the Religio Romana.

      It's an impossible situation.
      bene valete in pacem Saturni
      Maior




      --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "petronius_dexter" <jfarnoud94@...> wrote:
      >
      > Dexter Caecae s.p.d.,
      >
      > >>> While I can't speak to the issue of Senate editing and approval (not my purview), I do want to say that I found the posted report quite understandable.<<<
      >
      > Thank you very much.
      >
      > >>> Perhaps, since English is our working language, some minor editing can be done to smooth the language out a bit, but I had no trouble, and the "meat" of the report was satisfactory, for me, as it gave me the information I wanted.<<<
      >
      > Yes, the most important was the votes of the senators and their comments. Of course, I did not change any word of the comments.
      >
      > >>>I will admit to being curious, tough, about why you modified the initials of each Senator, just a bit.<<<
      >
      > I preferred follow the Latin abbreviations in which C = Gaius
      > and Cn = Gnaeus, Ti = Tiberius and T = Titus... I put a V at Ullerius because I prefer the "V" to the "U" as initial in Latin. But as I gave the abbreviations with the full names in the beginning of the report you can know who is who.
      >
      > Optime vale.
      >
      > C. Petronius Dexter
      > Tribunus Plebis
      >
      Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72706 From: Cato Date: 2009-12-20
      Subject: Re: Last report of the Senate session.
      Cato Petronio Dextero sal.

      I'm sorry but I understood almost nothing of what you said regarding the English language.

      At any rate, I am glad to hear that your colleagues will be assisting you in making future reports.

      Optime vale,

      Cato
      Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72707 From: petronius_dexter Date: 2009-12-20
      Subject: Re: Last report of the Senate session.
      C. Petronius C. Catoni s.p.d.,

      > I'm sorry but I understood almost nothing of what you said regarding the English language.

      Lol. Moi, je reconnais là votre parfaite mauvaise foi.

      > At any rate, I am glad to hear that your colleagues will be assisting you in making future reports.

      I am not the one who will make reports. In this case, it was urgent to give it to the people. I did. The next time will be the next time.

      Vale.

      C. Petronius Dexter
      Tribunus Plebis
      Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72708 From: L. Livia Plauta Date: 2009-12-20
      Subject: Re: Offtopic: Bambi & Thumper [1 Attachment]
      This is a lovely photo!

      ----- Original Message -----
      From: "A. Tullia Scholastica" <fororom@...>
      To: <Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com>
      Sent: Saturday, December 19, 2009 6:39 AM
      Subject: [Nova-Roma] Offtopic: Bambi & Thumper [1 Attachment]


      > A. Tullia Scholastica quiritibus, sociis, peregrinisque bonae voluntatis
      > S.P.D.
      >
      > Recently my brother sent me several charming pictures of a real Bambi
      > and Thumper pair. In the spirit of the season, I am pasting a reduced
      > version of one of them below, which I hope survives the trip. Others show
      > Bambi licking Thumper, and both of them nuzzling one another.
      >
      > Fruimini!
      >
      > Valete!
      >
      >
      >
      >
      >
      >
      Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72709 From: rory12001 Date: 2009-12-20
      Subject: Re: Last report of the Senate session.
      Maior Dextro sal;
      amazing! that's the same feeling we get in the Senate about Cato's English.

      The Senaculum list was also created by the consuls, an unofficial list for Senators to congregate and chat between sessions.
      optime vale
      Maior
      >
      > > I'm sorry but I understood almost nothing of what you said regarding the English language.
      >
      > Lol. Moi, je reconnais là votre parfaite mauvaise foi.
      >
      > > At any rate, I am glad to hear that your colleagues will be assisting you in making future reports.
      >
      > I am not the one who will make reports. In this case, it was urgent to give it to the people. I did. The next time will be the next time.
      >
      > Vale.
      >
      > C. Petronius Dexter
      > Tribunus Plebis
      >
      Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72710 From: marcus.lucretius Date: 2009-12-20
      Subject: Re: Last report of the Senate session.
      --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Cato" <catoinnyc@...> wrote:
      >
      > Cato Petronio Dextero sal.
      >
      > I'm sorry but I understood almost nothing of what you said regarding the English language.
      >


      Agricola Catoni sal.

      I did understand it. He is making reference to the globalization of English and the shift in "ownership" of the language from "inner circle" native speakers to all users of the language. Wikipedia has a nice discussion of many facets of this: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_English This article quotes linguist David Crystal and it may be well to repeat the quote here:

      "We may, in due course, all need to be in control of two standard Englishes—the one which gives us our national and local identity, and the other which puts us in touch with the rest of the human race. In effect, we may all need to become bilingual in our own language".

      optime vale!
      Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72711 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2009-12-20
      Subject: Re: Offtopic: Bambi & Thumper
      Attachments :
        Re: [Nova-Roma] Offtopic:  Bambi & Thumper
        A. Tullia Scholastica Maximae Valeriae Messallinae quiritibus, sociis, peregrinisque bonae voluntatis S.P.D.

        That is such an adorable picture!

            ATS:  I’m glad you like it.  It, and the others, are just darling.  Thumper looks quite astonished when Bambi is licking him/her.  Who knew that Bambi and Thumper were real, alive in Canada?  I’ll send you a couple of the others privately if you like; no need to clutter up the list.  I have a little exercise for my Grammatica students based on these and some others my brother has sent in the past; many language teachers find similar ones quite helpful.  

        Thank you, amica, for sharing it with us. :)

            ATS:  You’re quite welcome.  

        Vale, et valete!  



        --- On Fri, 12/18/09, A. Tullia Scholastica <fororom@localnet.com> wrote:

        From: A. Tullia Scholastica <fororom@localnet.com>
        Subject: [Nova-Roma] Offtopic: Bambi & Thumper [1 Attachment]
        To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
        Date: Friday, December 18, 2009, 9:39 PM

          
        A. Tullia Scholastica quiritibus, sociis, peregrinisque bonae voluntatis S.P.D.

            Recently my brother sent me several charming pictures of a real Bambi and Thumper pair.  In the spirit of the season, I am pasting a reduced version of one of them below, which I hope survives the trip.  Others show Bambi licking Thumper, and both of them nuzzling one another.  

            Fruimini!

            Valete!
          
            



        Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72712 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2009-12-20
        Subject: Re: Last report of the Senate session.
        Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: Last report of the Senate session.

         A. Tullia Scholastica C. Mariae Caecae C. Petronio Dextro quiritibus bonae voluntatis S.P.D.
         
           

        Caeca Dextero omnibusque sal,

        While I can't speak to the issue of Senate editing and approval (not my purview), I do want to say that I found the posted report quite understandable.  Perhaps, since English is our working language, some minor editing can be done to smooth the language out a bit, but I had no trouble, and the "meat" of the report was satisfactory, for me, as it gave me the information I wanted.  I will admit to being curious, tough, about why you modified the initials of each Senator, just a bit.


            ATS:  The initials our reporting tribunus used are the standard abbreviations for the 17 Roman praenomina, and should have been used from the first for those who do have these praenomina.  The Romans did not use the full praenomina except within their families and among their close friends; they wrote their praenomina with standard abbreviations, which Dexter has listed.  These appear in both of the primary English-language Latin grammars, Gildersleeve & Lodge and Allen & Greenough, and if memory serves, are also on the censorial nomenclature pages.  Many Latin textbooks also list them.

            Some of our senatores were admitted before the requirement for proper Roman praenomina was put into place, and have non-standard ones, which Dexter has abbreviated in keeping with the policy of abbreviating the others.  In many cases, the standard abbreviation [Latin, compendium] was the same as the initial of the name, but Gnaeus/Gnaea is abbreviated as Cn. in order to distinguish this name from Gaius/Gaia, whose abbreviation is C., and Tiberius/Tiberia is abbreviated as Ti., again to distinguish these from Titus/Tita.  Caeso (a strictly male name) is abbreviated as K.

        vale et valete bene,
        C. Maria Caeca

           Vale et valete bene.

        Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72713 From: Cato Date: 2009-12-20
        Subject: Re: Last report of the Senate session.
        Cato Dextero sal.

        Who is acting in bad faith if I say I do not understand what you wrote and you immediately laugh and declare the worst?

        I give up. The most polite approach in the world will never satisfy your overwhelming need to justify arrogance. Enjoy your year in..."power".

        Optime vale,

        Cato


        --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "petronius_dexter" <jfarnoud94@...> wrote:
        >
        > C. Petronius C. Catoni s.p.d.,
        >
        > > I'm sorry but I understood almost nothing of what you said regarding the English language.
        >
        > Lol. Moi, je reconnais là votre parfaite mauvaise foi.
        >
        > > At any rate, I am glad to hear that your colleagues will be assisting you in making future reports.
        >
        > I am not the one who will make reports. In this case, it was urgent to give it to the people. I did. The next time will be the next time.
        >
        > Vale.
        >
        > C. Petronius Dexter
        > Tribunus Plebis
        >
        Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72714 From: Marcus Iulius Scaeva Date: 2009-12-20
        Subject: Re: Last report of the Senate session.
        Salve Cato,
         
        My friend, maybe if you had been a little more tactfull in criticizing Dexter's English skills, he may have been less likely to have made a jab at you;  IMHO.
         
        Vale,
         
        M.Iulius Scaeva 



        From: Cato <catoinnyc@...>
        To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
        Sent: Sun, December 20, 2009 10:38:32 PM
        Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Last report of the Senate session.

         

        Cato Dextero sal.

        Who is acting in bad faith if I say I do not understand what you wrote and you immediately laugh and declare the worst?

        I give up. The most polite approach in the world will never satisfy your overwhelming need to justify arrogance. Enjoy your year in..."power" .

        Optime vale,

        Cato

        --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com, "petronius_dexter" <jfarnoud94@ ...> wrote:
        >
        > C. Petronius C. Catoni s.p.d.,
        >
        > > I'm sorry but I understood almost nothing of what you said regarding the English language.
        >
        > Lol. Moi, je reconnais là votre parfaite mauvaise foi.
        >
        > > At any rate, I am glad to hear that your colleagues will be assisting you in making future reports.
        >
        > I am not the one who will make reports. In this case, it was urgent to give it to the people. I did. The next time will be the next time.
        >
        > Vale.
        >
        > C. Petronius Dexter
        > Tribunus Plebis
        >

        Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72715 From: Cato Date: 2009-12-20
        Subject: Re: Last report of the Senate session.
        Cato Iulio Scaevae Agricolaesque SPD

        Scaeva, I wrote quite clearly:

        "NB: this is *not* an 'attack' of any kind on your abilities to
        communicate in English in an informal way, and any attempt - by anyone - to make it appear so is unacceptable and should be considered beneath contempt."

        When I did not understand what he was trying to say, I apologized and said so. I don't know how more tactful I needed to be.


        Agricola, I understand it now - thank you -, and consider it abhorrent. Perhaps some languages may acquiesce to their degradation to a lowest common denominator, but just because it is being done does not make it correct or laudable. The Academie Francaise might say the same regarding Dexter's native tongue.

        Optime valete,

        Cato



        --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Marcus Iulius Scaeva <johnnormancitron@...> wrote:
        >
        > Salve Cato,
        >
        > My friend, maybe if you had been a little more tactfull in criticizing Dexter's English skills, he may have been less likely to have made a jab at you;  IMHO.
        >
        > Vale,
        >
        > M.Iulius Scaeva 
        >
        >
        >
        >
        > ________________________________
        > From: Cato <catoinnyc@...>
        > To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
        > Sent: Sun, December 20, 2009 10:38:32 PM
        > Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Last report of the Senate session.
        >
        >  
        > Cato Dextero sal.
        >
        > Who is acting in bad faith if I say I do not understand what you wrote and you immediately laugh and declare the worst?
        >
        > I give up. The most polite approach in the world will never satisfy your overwhelming need to justify arrogance. Enjoy your year in..."power" .
        >
        > Optime vale,
        >
        > Cato
        >
        > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com, "petronius_dexter" <jfarnoud94@ ...> wrote:
        > >
        > > C. Petronius C. Catoni s.p.d.,
        > >
        > > > I'm sorry but I understood almost nothing of what you said regarding the English language.
        > >
        > > Lol. Moi, je reconnais là votre parfaite mauvaise foi.
        > >
        > > > At any rate, I am glad to hear that your colleagues will be assisting you in making future reports.
        > >
        > > I am not the one who will make reports. In this case, it was urgent to give it to the people. I did. The next time will be the next time.
        > >
        > > Vale.
        > >
        > > C. Petronius Dexter
        > > Tribunus Plebis
        > >
        >
        Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72716 From: rory12001 Date: 2009-12-20
        Subject: Re: Last report of the Senate session.
        Salve Scaeva;
        this is an old tactic from the BA crowd,back in 2004, I think Apulus Caesar was running for office and Q. Fabius Maximus made fun of his English.
        Trying to embarass someone who is speaking and making efforts in various languages is just plain bad manners. When we told Fabius Maximus to do better in Italian the gibberish he wrote had the ML laughing.

        You can believe I've been teased for my aberrant American patois in Ireland, saying such peculiar things as 'gas' for 'petrol' and my funny New York accent, no less England! And now the U.S. South.

        I'm learning Latin & making mistakes, thats the way to success, thinking now of trying Mandarin Chinese too.

        Num Iste Cato est sapientior quam Plato;-)

        lol, optime vale
        Maior

        >
        > Salve Cato,
        >
        > My friend, maybe if you had been a little more tactfull in criticizing Dexter's English skills, he may have been less likely to have made a jab at you; IMHO.
        >
        > Vale,
        >
        > M.Iulius ScaevaÂ
        >
        >
        >
        >
        > ________________________________
        > From: Cato <catoinnyc@...>
        > To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
        > Sent: Sun, December 20, 2009 10:38:32 PM
        > Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Last report of the Senate session.
        >
        > Â
        > Cato Dextero sal.
        >
        > Who is acting in bad faith if I say I do not understand what you wrote and you immediately laugh and declare the worst?
        >
        > I give up. The most polite approach in the world will never satisfy your overwhelming need to justify arrogance. Enjoy your year in..."power" .
        >
        > Optime vale,
        >
        > Cato
        >
        > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com, "petronius_dexter" <jfarnoud94@ ...> wrote:
        > >
        > > C. Petronius C. Catoni s.p.d.,
        > >
        > > > I'm sorry but I understood almost nothing of what you said regarding the English language.
        > >
        > > Lol. Moi, je reconnais là votre parfaite mauvaise foi.
        > >
        > > > At any rate, I am glad to hear that your colleagues will be assisting you in making future reports.
        > >
        > > I am not the one who will make reports. In this case, it was urgent to give it to the people. I did. The next time will be the next time.
        > >
        > > Vale.
        > >
        > > C. Petronius Dexter
        > > Tribunus Plebis
        > >
        >
        Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72717 From: Marcus Iulius Scaeva Date: 2009-12-21
        Subject: Re: Last report of the Senate session.
        Salve Maior,
         
        That is unfortunate;  considering that Latin should be the official language of NR in all official documentation.  That kind of behavior shows a degree of arrogance that doesn't serve the Republic well.
         
        I can relate to your being teased.  Every time I'm in Montreal and try to use French phrases I always receives looks and jeers.
         
        Moesta ob Cato sentio.  Cogito non ego is adquirat id.
         
        Vale,
         
        M. Iulius Scaeva

         

         



        From: rory12001 <rory12001@...>
        To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
        Sent: Sun, December 20, 2009 11:40:48 PM
        Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Last report of the Senate session.

         

        Salve Scaeva;
        this is an old tactic from the BA crowd,back in 2004, I think Apulus Caesar was running for office and Q. Fabius Maximus made fun of his English.
        Trying to embarass someone who is speaking and making efforts in various languages is just plain bad manners. When we told Fabius Maximus to do better in Italian the gibberish he wrote had the ML laughing.

        You can believe I've been teased for my aberrant American patois in Ireland, saying such peculiar things as 'gas' for 'petrol' and my funny New York accent, no less England! And now the U.S. South.

        I'm learning Latin & making mistakes, thats the way to success, thinking now of trying Mandarin Chinese too.

        Num Iste Cato est sapientior quam Plato;-)

        lol, optime vale
        Maior

        >
        > Salve Cato,
        >
        > My friend, maybe if you had been a little more tactfull in criticizing Dexter's English skills, he may have been less likely to
        have made a jab at you;Â IMHO.
        >
        > Vale,
        >
        > M.Iulius ScaevaÂ
        >
        >
        >
        >
        > ____________ _________ _________ __
        > From: Cato <catoinnyc@. ..>
        > To: Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com
        > Sent: Sun, December 20, 2009 10:38:32 PM
        > Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Last report of the Senate session.
        >
        > Â
        > Cato Dextero sal.
        >
        > Who is acting in bad faith if I say I do not understand what you wrote and you immediately laugh and declare the worst?
        >
        > I give up. The most polite approach in the world will never satisfy your overwhelming need to justify arrogance. Enjoy your year in..."power" .
        >
        > Optime vale,
        >
        > Cato
        >
        > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogrou
        target=_blank>ps.com, "petronius_dexter" <jfarnoud94@ ...> wrote:
        > >
        > > C. Petronius C. Catoni s.p.d.,
        > >
        > > > I'm sorry but I understood almost nothing of what you said regarding the English language.
        > >
        > > Lol. Moi, je reconnais là votre parfaite mauvaise foi.
        > >
        > > > At any rate, I am glad to hear that your colleagues will be assisting you in making future reports.
        > >
        > > I am not the one who will make reports. In this case, it was urgent to give it to the people. I did. The next time will be the next time.
        > >
        > > Vale.
        > >
        > > C. Petronius Dexter
        > > Tribunus Plebis
        > >
        >

        Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72718 From: Gaius Petronius Dexter Date: 2009-12-21
        Subject: [English version] Reporting of the Results of the Senate's Meetings
        C. Petronius Dexter tribunus Plebis Quiritibus Plebeis et Populo Novo Romano s.p.d.,
         
        Here is the Tribunician report of the last Senate session of November/December 2762 auc. This report is late because the former Tribunes could not report the session itself and the voting results at the same time as the election for Tribunes of the Plebs. It is my first experience reporting a Senate session and a session in which I did not sit in on. So, I collected the votes and the comments of the voters  from the Senate list.
         
        So, people of Nova Roma, I inform you by this report of the last Senate session and its votes. Good reading.
         
        The Senate contio began at the second hour (08.30 hrs. CET) on Saturday, 28 November 2762, with discussions and continued until approximately the end of the day (16.00 hrs CET) on Tuesday, December 1st, 2762.
        Voting began in the first hour at 07.30 hrs CET on Wednesday, December 2nd, 2762 and concluded at 16.00 hrs CET on Thursday December 3rd, 2762.
         
        The following (XXIV) Senators cast votes and are referred to below by their initials:
         
        Consules:
        [MIS] M. Iulius Severus
        [MCC] M. Curatius Complutensis
         
        Princeps Senatus:
        [KFBQ] K. Fabius Buteo Quintilianus 
         
        Censorii:
        [CnEM] Cn. Equitius Marinus
        [DIPI] D. Iunius Palladius Invictus
        [CFD] C. Flavius Diocletianus
        [KFBM] K. Fabius Buteo Modianus
         
        Consulares:
        [MMPH] M. Moravius Piscinus Horatianus
        [TiGP] Ti. Galerius Paulinus
        [QFM] Q. Fabius Maximus
        [TIS] T. Iulius Sabinus
         
        Praetorii:
        [MAM] M. Arminius Maior
        [CEC] C. Equitius Cato
        [ATS] A. Tullia Scholastica 
         
        Aedilicii:
        [PMA] P. Memmius Albucius
        [MHM] M. Hortensia Maior
        [EmCF] Em. Curia Finnica
        [CCS] C. Curius Saturninus 
         
        Tribunicii:
        [QSP] Q. Suetonius Paulinus
        [FGA] Fl. Galerius Aurelianus 
        [CVP] C. Vipsanius Agrippa 
         
        Quaestorii:
        [CnIC] Cn. Iulius Caesar
        [PVSV] P. Ullerius Stephanus Venator
        [EqIL] Equestria Iunia Laeca  
         

        The following Senator and the ex-Consul both voted by proxy:
        [MLA] M. Lucretius Agricola
        [MMA] M. Minucius Audens*
        * Ex-consul can vote according to the lex Popillia Senatoria.

        The following Senatores (V) did not vote:
        [CMM] C. Marius Merullus
        [LCSF] L. Cornelius Sulla Felix
        [FrAC] Fr. Apulus Caesar
        [MIP] M. Iulius Perusianus
        [ArnMA] Arn. Moravia Aurelia
         
        NB: I did not find in the Nova Roman Senate votes an Album Senatorum with all the names of the Senators registered (as meant by "Patres Conscripti"). Perhaps I was mistaken in giving you the above list of Senators taken from NRWiki. Actually, the call for Senate voting is very precise in its agenda; for example, at what time the sun rises in Rome, but it is sadly silent on the names and number of voters registered. I also made a comparison with the names of the Senators given in the July report, in which I found the same Senators except for A. Tullius Marcellus Cato who had recently resigned. In July, we had 32 senators; today, we have 30 senators (on NRWiki), but 31 voters (counting the vote by proxy of M. Minucius Audens). So, 2/3 of 30 senators is 20, not 22 as I read on the Senate Yahoogroup in the Consular report.
         
        "VTI ROGAS" indicates a vote in favor of an item,
        "ANTIQVO" is a vote against,
        "ABSTINEO" is an open abstention.
         
        And now....

        RELATIO:
         
        Quod bonum felixque sit populo Novo Romano Quiritibus, referimus ad vos, Patres et Matres conscriptos:
         
        Item I.
         
        Senatus Consultum Ultimum on the Tribunes of the Plebs.
         
        The Senate resolves that the Consuls may suspend the Constitutional requirement
        for all magistrates to take office on 1 January 2010 in order for the Tribunes
        of the Plebs to take office on 10 December 2009 in accordance with ancient
        practice.
         
        This Senatus Consultum Ultimum shall expire on 2 January 2010.
         
        The Senate strongly encourages next year's Consuls to promulgate a
        Constitutional amendment stipulating that the various magistrates take office on
        the days established by historical practice.
         
        Item I PASSED.
        VTI ROGAS : XXI.
        ANTIQVO :  0
        ABSTINEO : IV
         
        Consules.
        [MIS]: VTI ROGAS. 
        [MCC]:VTI ROGAS. 
         
        Princeps Senatus.
        [KFBQ]: VTI ROGAS. I certainly support this unusual measure in this case.
         
        Censorii.
        [CnEM]: VTI ROGAS
        [DIPI]: ABSTINEO. 
        [CFD]: ABSTINEO. 
        [KFBM]: VTI ROGAS... I don't think this is necessary and believe that those senatores who have been calling for it are simply interested in causing trouble.  If this will silence them then so be it.
         
        Consulares.
        [MMPH]: ASSENTIOR VTI ROGAS. It has always been the intention of the Senate to move Nova Roma closer to the traditions of the Res Publica of Roma antiqua. This is an evolving process. While a Tribunus Plebis I originated the lex that had our Tribuni Plebis enter office on 10 December as was done in the latter part of the Old Republic, not only for historical reasons but also to deal with a problem that had occurred the year prior. The measure still serves both purposes and thus I support this senatus consultum and the proposal to amend the Constitution.
         
        [TiGP]: VTI ROGAS. We all need to a better job of reading proposed laws before we discover they are flawed after they have been enacted.
         
        [QFM]:VTI ROGAS.
        [TIS]: VTI ROGAS.
         
        Praetorii.
        [MAM]: VTI ROGAS.  
        [CEC]: Did not cast his vote on its item.
        [ATS]: ASSENTIOR VTI ROGAS. 
         
        Aedilicii.
        [PMA]: VTI ROGAS. 
        Sen. Paulinus has well underlined during his electoral campaign the need that the practice we adopted a few years ago be more respectful of the  text of our constitution. I thank both consuls for having dealt with this matter quick, so that our elected tribunes may enter in office inside a correct legal frame. As consul electus, I intend, with my colleague, to submit our institutions the question on the matter (are the tribunes Plebis to enter in office on Dec. 10 or on Jan. 1?) and a relevant text during our 2763 auc term.

        [MHM]: VTI ROGAS. 
        [EmCF]: VTI ROGAS. 
        [CCS]: VTI ROGAS. 
         
        Tribunicii.
        [QSP]: VTI ROGAS. 
        [FGA]: VTI ROGAS.  
        [CVP]: VTI ROGAS.
         
        Quaestorii:
        [CnIC]: ABSTINEO. 
        [PVSV]: Ita = VTI ROGAS. 
        [EqIL]: VTI ROGAS.  
         
        Proxy.
        [MLA]: VTI ROGAS. 
        [MMA]: Abstain = ABSTINEO. 
         
        ------------ --------- --------- --------- --------- -----
         
        Quod bonum felixque sit populo Novo Romano Quiritibus, referimus ad vos, Patres et Matres conscriptos:
         
        Item II.
         
        Approval of the Lex Curiatia Iulia de institutis publicis religiosis passed by
        the Comitia Centuriata.
         
        By this Lex Curiatia Iulia de institutis publicis religiosis the Constitution,
        Article VI, on Public Religious Institutions, is hereby replaced by the
        following Article VI.
         
        a.- The Religio Romana, defined as the traditional worship of the Gods and
        Goddesses of Rome, shall be the official religion of Nova Roma.
         
        b.- The sacerdotal responsibilities for the State Religion of Nova Roma shall be
        invested primarily into the Collegium Pontificum and the Collegium Augurum.
         
        1. The Collegium Pontificum shall consist of the Rex and Regina Sacrorum, the
        Flamens, Flaminicas, Pontifices, and the Sacerdotes Vestales, co-opted by the
        Collegium Pontificum itself, under its own governing rules... The Collegium
        Pontificum shall be responsible for the conduct and administration of all public
        religious ceremonies other than those rites assigned to the Augurs. To that
        purpose, the Collegium Pontificum may create sacerdotal offices, sodalitates,
        and collegia.
         
        2. The Collegium Augurum shall consist of all public Augurs who are co-opted by
        the Collegium Augurum itself, under its own governing rules. The individual
        members of the Collegium Augurium shall be responsible for instructing and
        advising curule magistrates on performing auspicia on behalf of Nova Roma. In
        other religious ceremonies the Augures shall perform their traditional
        responsibilities. The Collegium Augurum may create sacerdotal offices and
        sodalitates that are specifically related to the conduct and administration of
        its responsibilities.
         
        C. Additional sacerdotal collegia may be instituted and their rules set by the
        Collegium Pontificum, with the approval of the Comitia Centuriata.
         
        Item II FAILED.
        VTI ROGAS: XVI.
        ANTIQVO:  VIII.
        ABSTINEO : II.
         
        Consules.
        [MIS]: VTI ROGAS. 
        [MCC]:VTI ROGAS. 
         
        Princeps Senatus.
        [KFBQ]: VTI ROGAS. This change is well needed by the Religio.
         
        Censorii.
        [CnEM]: VTI ROGAS.
        [DIPI]: ANTIQVO. I abstained on this item last time but vote no this time since it has already been rejected. I have no strong feelings against it but am voting against this procedurally. It failed to meet muster in the Senate, the process should begin again.
         
        [CFD]: ANTIQVO. 
        [KFBM]: VTI ROGAS.
         
        Consulares.
        [MMPH]:  ASSENTIOR VTI ROGAS. For the same reasons as I stated above, while Consul I first proposed this measure to meet both historical example and to deal with issues in our own Res Publica Libera today. I fully support the amendment to the Constitution that enables our Collegium Pontificum and Collegium Augurum to move forward.
        [TiGP]: ANTIQVO. As has already been pointed out you only get one bite at the apple. If this had passed the first time would anybody think it was ok to being it back for a vote, time and time again, until it had a majority to defeat it? This passed the Comitia Centuriata but was defeated in the Senate. It needs to be reenacted by the Comitia Centuriata and then presented to the Senate again. 
         
        [QFM]: ANTIQVO. It failed once. The Assembly must reissue the request.
         
        [TIS]: VTI ROGAS.

         
        Praetorii.
        [MAM]: VTI ROGAS. 
        [CEC]: ANTIQVO. Badly-written and already defeated. Let the People vote on a law with this proposal's benefits but without its serious flaws.
         
        [ATS]: ASSENTIOR VTI ROGAS.
         
        Aedilicii.
        [PMA]: VTI ROGAS. This adopted law is an improvement of the organization our religious institutions.
         
        [MHM]: VTI ROGAS. This is the will of the people! those senators who frustrate the Quirites' will; the CP and College of Augurs attempt to be more flexible to advance the cultus deorum, are simply against the Pax Deorum & should change their votes!
         
        [EmCF]: VTI ROGAS.
        [CCS]: VTI ROGAS. 
         
        Tribunicii:
        [QSP]: Abstain = ABSTINEO. 
        [FGA]: VTI ROGAS.  
        [CVP]: ANTIQVO. 
         
        Quaestorii.
        [CnIC]: ANTIQVO. This was already voted down by the Senate, and that vote meant the matter should have died. The only legal way to resurrect this proposal (that is all it is now having originally been rejected by the Senate) in my opinion is to start the whole legislative process again and put the matter once more to the people, and then if it passes return it to the Senate.
         
        [PVSV]: Negatio = ANTIQVO. 
        [EqIL]: VTI ROGAS.  
         
        Proxy:
        [MLA]: VTI ROGAS. 
        [MMA]: Abstain = ABSTINEO.
         
        While there are 16 votes "Yes", 8 votes "No"and 2 abstained, according to the Constitution the majority required is 2/3 of the senators, id est were expected 20 votes "Yes" at least in order to modify the Article VI of the Constitution. With 16 "Vti Rogas" it is not enough, so Item II failed.
         
        ------------ --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- --------
         
        Quod bonum felixque sit populo Novo Romano Quiritibus, referimus ad vos, Patres et Matres conscriptos:
         
        Item III.
         
        Approval of the Sodalitas proDIIS - A temple for the Gods in Rome.
         
        The Senate of Nova Roma decides hereby to make the Sodalitas proDIIS - A temple
        for the Gods in Rome an officially promoted project and sodalitas of Nova Roma.
        The project is open for the ideas, and the support, of all citizens of Nova Roma
        and for everyone willing to support this project for the Glory of our Roman
        Gods. A detailed business plan for this Sodalitas was sent by the Consuls to the
        Senate mail list files.
         
        Item III PASSED.
        VTI ROGAS: XXIV.
        ANTIQVO:  II.
        ABSTINEO: 0
         
        Consules.
        [MIS]: VTI ROGAS. 
        [MCC]:VTI ROGAS. 
         
        Princeps Senatus.
        [KFBQ]: VTI ROGAS. With the same provisions noted by Senator Albucius for concurrence on the part of the Collegium Pontificum.
         
        Censorii.
        [CnEM]: VTI ROGAS. With the same provisions noted by Senator Albucius for concurrence on the part of the Collegium Pontificum.
         
        [DIPI]: VTI ROGAS. With all my heart do I approve this worthy project.
         
        [CFD]: VTI ROGAS.  
        [KFBM]: VTI ROGAS. As I have mentioned before this really should be approved by the Collegium Pontificum; however, since I would vote in favor of it within the CP I will show my support here. I have been supportive of this cause since it's inception and support it still.
         
        Consulares.
        [MMPH]: ASSENTIOR VTI ROGAS.
        I have supported this project since its inception. The intended project is larger than any sodalitas may handle on its own. Indeed it may require Nova Roma to work with other organizations to achieve its goal, which shall benefit all practitioners of the religio Romana. And in that I am glad that Nova Roma will provide the initiative needed to restore a place for the Di Romani in Roma where all cultores Deorum Populi Romani shall be welcomed. Initium est dimidium facti...
         
        [TiGP]: ANTIQVO. I have already stated that I support this project but once again it should not be on the agenda. This should be rewritten as a sense of the Senate resolution stating that the Senate supports the project but leaves the approval of the Sodalitas to the Collegium. This is what the law requires.
         
        [QFM]: VTI ROGAS. 
        [TIS]: VTI ROGAS. 
         
        Praetorii.
        [MAM]: VTI ROGAS. 
        [CEC]: ANTIQVO. It should be going to the College of Pontiffs for approval, according to the law. I am surprised that those who continually call upon faithfulness to the law *and* recognition of the prerogatives of the pontiffs are suddenly lining up to violate both.
         
        [ATS]: Not without some reservations concerning the propriety of the Senate
        dealing with religious matters rather than the CP, but ASSENTIOR VTI ROGAS.
         
        Aedilicii.
        [PMA]:VTI ROGAS. With the formal condition of the second paragraph below.
        Censor Modianus has been right reminding us the text of lex Cassia de creatione sodalitatum. As consul electus, I intend to propose reviewing this field. The notion of a sodalitas being "a part of Nova Roma" is not clear and may drive us to oppose what could be the right of every Roman, to create a sodalitas and a collegium inside our Republic. We might, at the same time and in close collaboration with the religious colleges, examine what is a "religious" group etc., being considered that religion is by essence a part of Roman life and institutions. Last, we might at this time work on a difference between ordinary colleges etc. and those which requested the support of NR, under a given form to be studied.
        In what is thus for me an intermediary context, not sending a positive signal to working and active citizens in their work enhancing what could result in an ambitious real project would be counterproductive.
        In order that this work be as efficient as possible, I ask however, if this item is adopted, the praeses collegii (current quaestor and aed. cur. electus T. Flavius Aquila, leg. pp. Germaniae), to request, formally and with no delay, all needed advices from the Pontifex Maximus, as representative of our religious collegia.
         
        [MHM]: VTI ROGAS.A great undertaking; it has my total support. 
        [EmCF]: VTI ROGAS. 
        [CCS]: VTI ROGAS. As our pontifex maximus approves this approach.
         
        Tribunicii.
        [QSP]: VTI ROGAS. A worthy project long overdue. 
        [FGA]: VTI ROGAS.  
        [CVP]: VTI ROGAS.
         
        Quaestorii.
        [CnIC]: VTI ROGAS. A worthy enterprise. 
         
        [PVSV]: Ita = VTI ROGAS. 
        [EqIL]: VTI ROGAS.  
         
        Proxy.
        [MLA]: VTI ROGAS. 
        [MMA]: VTI ROGAS.
         
        ------------ --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- -----
         
        Quod bonum felixque sit populo Novo Romano Quiritibus, referimus ad vos, Patres et Matres conscriptos:
         
        Item IV.
         
        Approval of new Senate rules
         
        In recent times the Senate list has been becoming a tacky place for discussion,
        where everybody seems to feel authorized to attack and insult everybody. To
        avoid this situation, the Consuls propose the establishment of some minimum
        standards:
         
        a) The Senate list must be under the moderation control of the Consuls...
         
        b) The Contio will be moderated. Each Senator shall have her or his
        respective turns for speech and replies according to the traditions followed in
        ancient Rome, so nobody can monopolize the Senate rostrum and become the center
        of all debates.
         
        c) The Senate list will be closed between sessions. If the Senatores would
        like to discuss Nova Roma matters, they can do this in private or in other
        forums.
         
        d) Discussions will be not allowed during the voting time.
         
        Off topic messages during contio or voting time will be rejected.
         
        Item IV PASSED.
        VTI ROGAS: XIV.
        ANTIQVO:  XI.
        ABSTINEO: I.
         
        Consules.
        [MIS]: VTI ROGAS. 
        [MCC]:VTI ROGAS. 
         
        Princeps Senatus.
        [KFBQ]: VTI ROGAS. Some balanced rules are needed to give the senate good working conditions. These new rules seems to be able gives us that.
         
        Censorii.
        [CnEM]: VTI ROGAS.
        [DIPI]: ABSTINEO. This version is far better than those presented before so I will not stand in its way but I will not vote for it either as I see no pressing need for it. I have no objection to some form of moderation but see no reason to close the senate list. The current list has served us well enough. I hope the new non-historical senaculum list (ok, the senate list is non-historical too, there are no senate chambers but let's not belabor the obvious) will be mandatory so the board of directors can still communicate freely. It was rather amusing to see historicity as a reason for a new list but no actual examples of historical precedent were presented and those presented by Maior actually opposed her position. No surprise there of course.
         
        [CFD]: ANTIQVO. 
        [KFBM]: VTI ROGAS. I am saddened that this sort of rule is necessary.  I would rather see undesirable elements within the senate thrown out instead of having to resort to more rules, but will support this change for now.
         
        Consulares.
        [MMPH]: ASSENTIOR VTI ROGAS. The Senate has serious matters to consider, requiring that its sessions work effectively towards resolutions. For that we need some rules to keep our focus on the issues. While some have voiced their opposition to any rules as a curtailment of their free speech, and others shall protest that this measure does not go far enough to ensure orderly debate, I think that there is a certain balance in the final version that offers us a working enviroment needed for our discourses.
          
        [TiGP]: ANTIQVO. As I said before. For over ten years this Senate list has been open between sessions for any Senator to bring before this body any subject that a Senator may choose to address. The items discussed still must make their way on to the Consuls agenda before a formal vote can be taken. If it is a good idea it usual does, if not, not.  I believe that an open Senate list  has served us well in all of this time and I am firmly against this proposal in its entirety.
        If an individual Senator or a group of Senators do not want to receive messages between sessions they can simply change their own Yahoo setting for this list to digest only. Those Senators who wish to discuss an item would be free to do so. 
        Nova Roma needs more free and open discussions not less.  During a formal session of the Senate the Consuls get to invite anybody they like to address this house and they set the agenda. Those Senators  who wish to remain after a session to discuss whatever should be allowed to do so.  By keeping this list open we have a permanent record of these informal discussions and can use these to determine if a given idea has merit or not. The Consuls are already moderators of this list per an agreement made during Censor Modianus Consulship on list ownership and moderation. The Senate list should remain under the ownership and lead moderation of the Censors as the Consuls have enough to do and enough power over this house as it is. The moderation of this house by the Censors, with the occasional assistance of the Consuls is one more check and balance within our system. 
        I see no need to change what has worked for over ten years. For the record, both public and private, I have to add that I believe this recommendation of the Consuls is one more grab for power and another effort to silence anybody who has an opinion different than theirs.
        It should also be noted that this is the first pair of Consuls in Nova Roman history to have ask for the ability to silence the Senate in their own
        house.  Consuls like Modianus and myself never asked for it.  Consuls dealing with a civil war back in 1998 did not request it... For ten years no
        other Consuls have asked for this.
        I respectfully ask that ALL Senators vote against this measure for the freedom of speech you save today will be your own.
         
        [QFM]: ANTIQVO. What has suited us for ten years needs to be changed?  Why?
         
        [TIS]:VTI ROGAS. 
         
        Praetorii.
        [MAM]: ANTIQVO. 
        [CEC]: ANTIQVO. Nothing in ancient practice suggests or requires this kind of suppression of free speech. It is abhorrent to a free people.
         
        [ATS]: This is a vast improvement over the earlier proposals, though I still see no reason why this list should be closed in between sessions and another one established. With considerable reservations, however, I shall vote to approve it.  Clearly some here need external control as they are unable to supply the internal version. ASSENTIOR VTI ROGAS.
         
        Aedilicii.
        [PMA]: VTI ROGAS.
        Thanks to consul Severus wiseness and work, the proposed text offers us a resonable frame with guarantees a fair balance between the need that our Senate keep free, even tough, discussions and the improvement in having us working as efficiently as possible on the proposed items by  the presiding magistrate.
        Outside the sessions, we have, like our Ancients, several possibilities to discuss inside whatever frames we would wish to use: the political fight may be carried on in our fora or private debates, and the collegia or private places may welcome useful exchanges, 'think tanks' etc..
         
        [MHM]: VTI ROGAS. The Senate list is impossible, dominated by the innumerable rantings of a few bullies. The Senaculum would siphon this off & is utterly historical. And insures free speech. Having order in the Senate is historical too as was posted.
         
        [EmCF]: VTI ROGAS. 
        [CCS]: VTI ROGAS. I ask all the senators to vote for this measure. This will bring us considerably closer to ancient practices and hopefully also gurantees appropriate behaviour in the meetings of the senate. This measure has absolutely nothing to do with the freedom of speech because nothing prevents senators to send private emails or having Yahoo lists or whatever they deem necessary for discussions. I think this is a very welcome measure.
         
        Tribunicii.
        [QSP]: ANTIQVO. My views on this are pretty well reflective of what Senator Paulinus has just pointed out.
        [FGA]: ANTIQVO.  
        [CVP]: ANTIQVO. 
         
        Quaestorii.
        [CnIC]: ANTIQVO. Point {a} creates another list for no real benefit. We have a perfectly adequate list here.
        Point {b} doesn't define whether the 12 hour moderation affects the right to vote in any way... Will such messages containing votes be accepted or not. Some clarification on the extent and effect of moderation would I feel have been beneficial..
        Point {c} just repeats the current state of affairs.
         
        [PVSV]: Negatio = ANTIQVO. 
        [EqIL]: VTI ROGAS. As revised.  
         
        Proxy:
        [MLA]: VTI ROGAS. 
        [MMA]: ANTIQVO.
         
        ------------ --------- --------- --------- --------- -
         
        Optime valete.
         
        C. Petronius Dexter
        Tribunus Plebis
        Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72719 From: Cn. Cornelius Lentulus Date: 2009-12-21
        Subject: Io Saturnalia!!!
        Salvete!

        I'm here just to say "Io Triumphe!".

        Our Saturnalia Party at Saturday was amaaaaaazing! A very nice event with approximately 20-25 people, together, celebrating NOVA ROMA and SATURN!

        This is Nova Roma and what Nova Roma is all about!

        Recruit people, organize meetings and forget the Main List!

        Let it be our motto.

        IO SATURNALIA!

        Cn. Lentulus
        Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72720 From: csentiusleoninus Date: 2009-12-21
        Subject: Re: new project
        Leoninus C. Marcio Crispo omnibusque S.P.D
        >
        > One of my books suggests that the term `m.d.u.' is a Latin abbreviation for `More Dicto Utendus' which means
        > `to be used as directed'.

        Many thanks for this. It certainly makes sense.

        Valete optime!
        Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72721 From: Titus Flavius Aquila Date: 2009-12-21
        Subject: Collegium Sodalitas proDIIS: Plurimas Gratias to the Senate of Nova

        Salvete Quirites,

          

        we as the Collegium sodalitas proDIIS have the pleasure informing you, that the Senate of Nova Roma has voted the following decision :

         

        "Item III

         Approval of the Sodalitas proDIIS - A temple for the Gods in Rome

        The Senate of Nova Roma decides hereby to make the Sodalitas proDIIS - A temple for the Gods in Rome an officially promoted project and sodalitas of Nova Roma. The project is open for the ideas, and the support, of all citizens of Nova Roma and for everyone willing to support this project for the Glory of our Roman Gods. A detailed business plan for this Sodalitas was sent by the Consuls to the Senate mail list files.”

         

         

        The Collegium sodalitas proDIIS would like to say THANK YOU on behalf of all members of the sodalitas to the Senate of Nova Roma , for approving, with an important majority vote, our sodalitas as official promoted project of Nova Roma.

         

        We will work in very close cooperation with the Pontifex Maximus and the Collegium Pontifices as pointed out during the senate session.

         

        Be assured, that we are very well aware of the great responsibility laid upon us.

         

        We call upon all of our citizens of Nova Roma to join our work and support the sodalitas proDIIS. To support a project that has not been seen for over 1600 years, to build a temple for our Roman Gods.

         

        http://groups.yahoo.com/group/SodalitasPRODIIS-NR/

         

        As our Pontifex Maximus Marcus Moravius Piscinus Horatianus stated:

         

        “And in that I am glad that Nova Roma will provide the initiative needed to restore a place for the Di Romani in Roma where all cultores Deorum Populi Romani shall be welcomed."


        Di vos incolumes custodiant

         

        Titus Flavius Aquila

        Marcus Octavius Corvus

        Gaius Antonius Costa

        Collegium sodalitas proDIIS

        http://prodiis.org/

         


        __________________________________________________
        Do You Yahoo!?
        Sie sind Spam leid? Yahoo! Mail verfügt über einen herausragenden Schutz gegen Massenmails.
        http://mail.yahoo.com
        Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72722 From: Marcus Audens Date: 2009-12-21
        Subject: Fw: [newroman] IO SATVRNALIA!
        Command is a matter of wisdom, integrity, humanity, courage and dicipline. Sun Tzu -- "The Art of War"

        From: Marcus Audens
        Sent: Monday, December 21, 2009 5:10 AM
        To: SenatusRomanus@yahoogroups.com, NewRoman@yahoogroups.com
        Subject: [newroman] IO SATVRNALIA!

         

        To all my friends in Nova Roma, I wish the best of the Saturnalia Holidays. I hope for all of you an exciting and productive holiday season followed by a bright and prosperous New Year, in which we may all consider that honey will catch more of what we want than salt, and at one time or another we will all be needful of each other in some future endeavor if NR is to go forward as we all wish.

        Respectfully;

        Marcus Audens

        [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

        Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72723 From: Cn. Cornelius Lentulus Date: 2009-12-21
        Subject: Nova Roma Will Win!
        Cn. Lentulus pontifex et legatus pr. pr. et custos et magister aranearius omnibus Romanis civibus sal.

        Io Saturnalia!

        This year of Nova Roma was kind of stagnation. But soon a new year of new opportunities will come!

        The most wonderful Roman community in the world, our Nova Roma, our blessed and beloved Nova Roma that we all hold dear and that we are all proud of, our spiritual home and the first Roman republic since Rome fell, our promising community is facing a possibility, a new year to start things more Rome.

        To make more efforts to recreate authentic elements of the old Roman republic, to make Nova Roma more historical, more Roman: this is why we are here: to restore the Roman institutions and customs. Nova Roma is dedicated to the restoration of classical Roman religion, culture and virtues.

        What I expect from all new magistrates is to make shiningly evident that we are first and foremost a spiritual State of the reborn Roman nation, one nation without consideration to ethnic origin. The corporation is nothing but a tool, a tool to achieve things in the macronational reality. Not a goal in itself.

        If it would be a goal in itself, Nova Roma would never be more just a reenactor club. But our founders' dream was far more than this.

        They dreamed about a new Roman nation.

        And we came to them, and now we are a big family of new Romans!

        A dream came true.

        Prayers for the next year, that it be more truer!
        Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72724 From: marcus.lucretius Date: 2009-12-21
        Subject: Re: Last report of the Senate session.
        --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Cato" <catoinnyc@...> wrote:
        >
        >
        > Agricola, I understand it now - thank you -, and consider it abhorrent. Perhaps some languages may acquiesce to their degradation to a lowest common denominator, but just because it is being done does not make it correct or laudable. The Academie Francaise might say the same regarding Dexter's native tongue.
        >
        > Optime valete,
        >
        > Cato
        >
        >

        Agricola Catoni sal.

        You are not alone, certainly, in this, but probably in a minority, at least among linguists. We native speakers of English get great benefit when our language is used globally in the way that it is: commerce, science, government. But if English is going to be accepted as the global standard most broadly, and I mean by those people who do not speak it as a native tongue, then we have to be willing to accept that other varieties besides the traditionally prestige dialects be accepted without opprobrium in public discourse. This in a nutshell is the idea of "world Englishes".

        What we are talking about here isn't chaos. In fact, the range of dialectical variation is no more than what occurs naturally between the various "native speaker" communities. Collect together an American from the deep South, another from California, another from inner city Chicago, a Canadian, a Scot, a Londoner, an Indian, an Australian, a New Zealander, whom have I left out? -- all "native speakers" and try to get them to write a grammar on which all can agree, then stand back. We've met, so you know that I speak a prestige dialect myself, but am I justified in requiring all the other native speakers to conform to my standards? There certainly ARE discourse communities where such compliance would be expected. But here in our community, we can establish the norms for our discourse community among ourselves. This is the "escape" of English. It is no longer in the hands of the native speakers of the prestige dialects to dictate the standards to all.

        I'm not writing what I hope to be, but what is, as it is observed in the field by linguists. I recently attended a conference where I heard some very interesting presentations on the English use of non-native English speakers in different professions. One presentation was a corpus study of award-winning IEEE papers that revealed an interesting and systematic pattern of "non-standard" usage. Note that these publications *won awards* in their field.

        Well, when I get going on applied linguistics I can go forever, so I'll stop here. I have a feeling that we may have to agree to disagree on this one, but I hope you found it interesting anyway.

        optime vale
        Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72725 From: marcushoratius Date: 2009-12-21
        Subject: a. d. XII Kalendas Ianuarias: DIVALIA
        M. Moravius Piscinus Horatianus cultoribus Deorum, Quiritibus et omnibus salutem plurimam dicit: Io Saturnalia! Io Triumphe!

        Hodie est ante diem XII Kalendas Ianuarias; haec dies nefastus est: Divalia Angeronae, Brumale solstitium.

        "Saturn is thought to have come first into Italy; so also the Virgilian muse testifies in these verses:

        First from the Olympian aether came Saturn,
        Fleeing the weapons of Jupiter, etc.

        "So much simplicity of the men of old had been handed down to that time, that when foreigners came to them, who indeed they were able
        with their counsel and wisdom to instruct them in how to live and form their customs, these not knowing their parents and origin, they
        not only believed them born from Sky and Earth, indeed also they so informed their descendants concerning this Saturn, whom they said was
        the son of Sky and Earth." ~ Sextus Aurelius Victor, De Origines genti Romanae 1.1-2


        DIVALIA:

        "The Angeronalia, from Angerona, to whom a sacrifice is made in the Curia Acculeia and for whom this day is a public festival." ~ M.
        Terrentius Varro, Lingua Latinae 6.23

        "A festival for the Goddesses Angeronae to whom the pontifices make sacrifice in the Temple of Volupa; from which, according to Verrius
        Flaccus, it receives the name Angeronia, in propitiation for expelling anguish and anxiety." ~ Macrobius, Saturnalia 1.10

        "Last and greater than all, Rome herself, whose other name the hallowed mysteries of the sacred rites forbid us to mention without being guilty of the greatest impiety. After it had been long kept buried in secrecy with the strictest fidelity and in respectful and salutary silence, Valerius Soranus dared to divulge it, but soon did he pay the penalty of his rashness.

        "It will not perhaps be altogether foreign to the purpose, if I here make mention of one peculiar institution of our forefathers which bears especial reference to the inculcation of silence on religious matters. The Goddess Angerona, to whom sacrifice is offered on the twelfth day before the calends of January [21st December], is represented in Her statue as having Her mouth bound with a sealed fillet." ~ C. Plinius Secundus, Historia Naturalis 3.9.65-67

        Angerona was thought by some to be a Goddess who both brought on and relieved anguish and fear. She was associated with Bona Dea Angitia,
        who had lived along the shores of Lake Fucinus among the Marrubians and the Marsi. Her sacred grove in the Silva Angitia lay towards Alba
        (Orelli, nos. 115; 116; 1846). Myth identified Angitia with Medea, coming from Colchis to Italy with Jason, where she taught on how to heal with herbs (Silius Italicus, Punica 8.498, etc.). But She was also identified with Muta or Tacita, the Goddess whose name must never be revealed.

        "Verrius Flaccus cites authors whom he deems worthy of credit, to show that on the occasion of a siege, it was the usage, the first thing of all, for the Roman priests to summon forth the tutelary divinity of that particular town, and to promise him the same rites, or even a more extended worship, at Rome; and at the present day even, this ritual still forms part of the discipline of our pontiffs. Hence it is, no doubt, that the name of the tutelary deity of Rome has been so strictly kept concealed, lest any of our enemies should act in a similar manner." ~ C. Plinius Secundus, Historia Naturalis 28.4

        Many have speculated on what Her true name may have been. Some of these have thought Angerona to be Favra or Fona, Acca, Flora, or Valesia, Valentia, Sorana, or Hirpa, any of which could also be identified with Feronia or Vibia.


        AUC 822 / 69 CE: The Senate officially recognized Vespasianus as emperor.


        Our thought for today is from Epicurus, Vatican Sayings 34:

        "We do not so much need the assistance of our friends as we do the confidence of their assistance in need."
        Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72726 From: marcushoratius Date: 2009-12-21
        Subject: Re: Last report of the Senate session.
        Salve Hortensia

        That BA tactic is older still. In 2000 Sulla attacked Marcius Rex as a candidate for censor, saying that he, Sulla, would be unable to work with someone who was not a native speaker of English. Marcius Rex is an Austrian ambassador to the EU and was a professor of law at Vienna. His English outshown most of us "native" speakers. Such attacks as have been made over the years by Sulla, Fabius Maximus, and now Cato have been more of an embarassment to Nova Roma for their pettiness and meanness of character. It is counter-productive to our Citizens working together, and it has often appeared to be their very intent to thwarth Nova Roma from progressing.

        What funny accent? I didn't notice it. Ni hun hao.

        Vale optime
        M. Moravius


        --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "rory12001" <rory12001@...> wrote:
        >
        > Salve Scaeva;
        > this is an old tactic from the BA crowd,back in 2004, I think Apulus Caesar was running for office and Q. Fabius Maximus made fun of his English.
        > Trying to embarass someone who is speaking and making efforts in various languages is just plain bad manners. When we told Fabius Maximus to do better in Italian the gibberish he wrote had the ML laughing.
        >
        > You can believe I've been teased for my aberrant American patois in Ireland, saying such peculiar things as 'gas' for 'petrol' and my funny New York accent, no less England! And now the U.S. South.
        >
        > I'm learning Latin & making mistakes, thats the way to success, thinking now of trying Mandarin Chinese too.
        >
        > Num Iste Cato est sapientior quam Plato;-)
        >
        > lol, optime vale
        > Maior
        >
        > >
        > > Salve Cato,
        > >
        > > My friend, maybe if you had been a little more tactfull in criticizing Dexter's English skills, he may have been less likely to have made a jab at you; IMHO.
        > >
        > > Vale,
        > >
        > > M.Iulius ScaevaÂ
        > >
        > >
        > >
        > >
        > > ________________________________
        > > From: Cato <catoinnyc@>
        > > To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
        > > Sent: Sun, December 20, 2009 10:38:32 PM
        > > Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Last report of the Senate session.
        > >
        > > Â
        > > Cato Dextero sal.
        > >
        > > Who is acting in bad faith if I say I do not understand what you wrote and you immediately laugh and declare the worst?
        > >
        > > I give up. The most polite approach in the world will never satisfy your overwhelming need to justify arrogance. Enjoy your year in..."power" .
        > >
        > > Optime vale,
        > >
        > > Cato
        > >
        > > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com, "petronius_dexter" <jfarnoud94@ ...> wrote:
        > > >
        > > > C. Petronius C. Catoni s.p.d.,
        > > >
        > > > > I'm sorry but I understood almost nothing of what you said regarding the English language.
        > > >
        > > > Lol. Moi, je reconnais là votre parfaite mauvaise foi.
        > > >
        > > > > At any rate, I am glad to hear that your colleagues will be assisting you in making future reports.
        > > >
        > > > I am not the one who will make reports. In this case, it was urgent to give it to the people. I did. The next time will be the next time.
        > > >
        > > > Vale.
        > > >
        > > > C. Petronius Dexter
        > > > Tribunus Plebis
        > > >
        > >
        >
        Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72727 From: marcushoratius Date: 2009-12-21
        Subject: Re: Last report of the Senate session.
        Salve Agricola

        You left out those from Belize, whose English is purer and less influenced by foreign contacts than is the English spoken in London today.

        You don't have to travel all over the US to discover the diversity that exists just in this country. Just travel about from neighborhood to neighborhood in any major city. I live in a city of only 200,000 and there are parts where some neighbors speak a form of English I cannot understand. Our society is becoming more cosmopolitan with immigrants arriving from all over the world, and others coming from different parts of the US. There are many in Akron from West Virginia, and just as I cannot understand them well, they have a hard time understanding my Cleveland accent. There are ethnic differences, generational differences, class differences, as well as regional differences, all of which will continually evolve the language's diversity.

        Rather than bringing the language "down to the lowest common denominator" as Cato would have it, this process of change has always infused new words and new ideas into languages, resulting in greater progress through communication.

        Vale
        Piscinus

        --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "marcus.lucretius" <marcus.lucretius@...> wrote:
        >
        >
        >
        > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Cato" <catoinnyc@> wrote:
        > >
        > >
        > > Agricola, I understand it now - thank you -, and consider it abhorrent. Perhaps some languages may acquiesce to their degradation to a lowest common denominator, but just because it is being done does not make it correct or laudable. The Academie Francaise might say the same regarding Dexter's native tongue.
        > >
        > > Optime valete,
        > >
        > > Cato
        > >
        > >
        >
        > Agricola Catoni sal.
        >
        > You are not alone, certainly, in this, but probably in a minority, at least among linguists. We native speakers of English get great benefit when our language is used globally in the way that it is: commerce, science, government. But if English is going to be accepted as the global standard most broadly, and I mean by those people who do not speak it as a native tongue, then we have to be willing to accept that other varieties besides the traditionally prestige dialects be accepted without opprobrium in public discourse. This in a nutshell is the idea of "world Englishes".
        >
        > What we are talking about here isn't chaos. In fact, the range of dialectical variation is no more than what occurs naturally between the various "native speaker" communities. Collect together an American from the deep South, another from California, another from inner city Chicago, a Canadian, a Scot, a Londoner, an Indian, an Australian, a New Zealander, whom have I left out? -- all "native speakers" and try to get them to write a grammar on which all can agree, then stand back. We've met, so you know that I speak a prestige dialect myself, but am I justified in requiring all the other native speakers to conform to my standards? There certainly ARE discourse communities where such compliance would be expected. But here in our community, we can establish the norms for our discourse community among ourselves. This is the "escape" of English. It is no longer in the hands of the native speakers of the prestige dialects to dictate the standards to all.
        >
        > I'm not writing what I hope to be, but what is, as it is observed in the field by linguists. I recently attended a conference where I heard some very interesting presentations on the English use of non-native English speakers in different professions. One presentation was a corpus study of award-winning IEEE papers that revealed an interesting and systematic pattern of "non-standard" usage. Note that these publications *won awards* in their field.
        >
        > Well, when I get going on applied linguistics I can go forever, so I'll stop here. I have a feeling that we may have to agree to disagree on this one, but I hope you found it interesting anyway.
        >
        > optime vale
        >
        Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72728 From: Maxima Valeria Messallina Date: 2009-12-21
        Subject: Re: Languages (Was: Last report of the Senate session)
        I could not agree more that languages are infused with new life with all the differences. Every time I go to Mexico, I am constantly discovering new dialects and differences in Spanish. I learned most of my Spanish as a child, but all the Spanish I learned as an adult comes out with the distinct acento norte americano. Even so, when Spaniards hears my Spanish, they think I am from Mexico. Mexicans, however, even with my best Spanish know instantly I'm an American and those with well trained ears will correctly ascertain that I am a native Californian.
        Same in France; I can hear all these wonderfully different accents even though everyone is speaking French and I always ask where the person is from so I can accustom my ear to distinguishing the different dialects and regions. It makes learning new languages fun. Thank goodness we don't all sound the same. How boring would that be!
        Now I'm going to venture a guess that not everyone in ancient Rome spoke Latin exactly in the same manner. Don't you think there would have been a difference between the Latin of a scholar and that of a farmer? Between a native of Rome and say a native of Capua? Between those who were raised speaking Latin and those who learned it later in life? I'd like to think it made Latin sound as interesting to the ear as all the differences we hear today in English and with all languages everywhere (unless it's a language spoken by a very small group of people living in relative isolation from the rest of the world).
         
        Maxima Valeria Messallina


        --- On Mon, 12/21/09, marcushoratius <MHoratius@...> wrote:

        From: marcushoratius <MHoratius@...>
        Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Last report of the Senate session.
        To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
        Date: Monday, December 21, 2009, 6:47 AM

         
        Salve Agricola

        You left out those from Belize, whose English is purer and less influenced by foreign contacts than is the English spoken in London today.

        You don't have to travel all over the US to discover the diversity that exists just in this country. Just travel about from neighborhood to neighborhood in any major city. I live in a city of only 200,000 and there are parts where some neighbors speak a form of English I cannot understand. Our society is becoming more cosmopolitan with immigrants arriving from all over the world, and others coming from different parts of the US. There are many in Akron from West Virginia, and just as I cannot understand them well, they have a hard time understanding my Cleveland accent. There are ethnic differences, generational differences, class differences, as well as regional differences, all of which will continually evolve the language's diversity.

        Rather than bringing the language "down to the lowest common denominator" as Cato would have it, this process of change has always infused new words and new ideas into languages, resulting in greater progress through communication.

        Vale
        Piscinus

        --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com, "marcus.lucretius" <marcus.lucretius@ ...> wrote:
        >
        >
        >
        > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com, "Cato" <catoinnyc@> wrote:
        > >
        > >
        > > Agricola, I understand it now - thank you -, and consider it abhorrent. Perhaps some languages may acquiesce to their degradation to a lowest common denominator, but just because it is being done does not make it correct or laudable. The Academie Francaise might say the same regarding Dexter's native tongue.
        > >
        > > Optime valete,
        > >
        > > Cato
        > >
        > >
        >
        > Agricola Catoni sal.
        >
        > You are not alone, certainly, in this, but probably in a minority, at least among linguists. We native speakers of English get great benefit when our language is used globally in the way that it is: commerce, science, government. But if English is going to be accepted as the global standard most broadly, and I mean by those people who do not speak it as a native tongue, then we have to be willing to accept that other varieties besides the traditionally prestige dialects be accepted without opprobrium in public discourse. This in a nutshell is the idea of "world Englishes".
        >
        > What we are talking about here isn't chaos. In fact, the range of dialectical variation is no more than what occurs naturally between the various "native speaker" communities. Collect together an American from the deep South, another from California, another from inner city Chicago, a Canadian, a Scot, a Londoner, an Indian, an Australian, a New Zealander, whom have I left out? -- all "native speakers" and try to get them to write a grammar on which all can agree, then stand back. We've met, so you know that I speak a prestige dialect myself, but am I justified in requiring all the other native speakers to conform to my standards? There certainly ARE discourse communities where such compliance would be expected. But here in our community, we can establish the norms for our discourse community among ourselves. This is the "escape" of English. It is no longer in the hands of the native speakers of the prestige dialects to dictate the standards to all.
        >
        > I'm not writing what I hope to be, but what is, as it is observed in the field by linguists. I recently attended a conference where I heard some very interesting presentations on the English use of non-native English speakers in different professions. One presentation was a corpus study of award-winning IEEE papers that revealed an interesting and systematic pattern of "non-standard" usage. Note that these publications *won awards* in their field.
        >
        > Well, when I get going on applied linguistics I can go forever, so I'll stop here. I have a feeling that we may have to agree to disagree on this one, but I hope you found it interesting anyway.
        >
        > optime vale
        >


        Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72729 From: Cato Date: 2009-12-21
        Subject: language
        Cato Agricolae sal.

        Thank you, and yes, even though I dislike the foundations for it, it certainly is fascinating to explore how language changes. It may be a necessity in the new global world we live in (sort of a redundancy, but I think you understand what I mean) that languages will be forced to adapt, and English is - simply by virtue of it place as the current lingua franca - the most obvious and affected so far.

        My first exposure to the fact that English was a separate language (sounds stupid, I know, but I was young) was when I spoke French in France the first time. My French friends thought my "accent" was cute - and I didn't even realize that I *had* an accent - an American one! I found it fascinating that, exactly as an American can recognize, say, a German or French accent when they speak English, to all those other countries we have an accent too. Again, it sounds silly, but I had never even considered my own language in that way.

        I don't want to have sounded harsh, but I think there *should* be a universally-upheld standard for languages, English included.

        Now, a question that might be posed is can we say that there is a single definitive "accent" for Latin, as there are no longer any native speakers? I must suppose that a French person - like Albucius - would speak Latin slightly differently than Severus - who in turn would speak it slightly differently than Lentulus, being Hungarian, or Sabinus, being Romanian.

        Vale,

        Cato
        Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72730 From: Cato Date: 2009-12-21
        Subject: Re: Last report of the Senate session.
        Cato Piscino sal.

        I am constantly amazed by the depths to which you and Maior will reach in order to score some kind of imagined brownie points. I don't know who you're trying to impress or convince, but that dog won't hunt :)

        I do not - and never have, and never will - made fun of anyone who does not speak English as their native tongue; quite the opposite, as I have clearly shown. A native speaker of English, though, such as yourself, might be more careful when using words like "thwart". If you cannot spell a word you should, in general, not use it in speech, written or spoken.

        Optime vale,

        Cato

        --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "marcushoratius" <MHoratius@...> wrote:
        >
        > Salve Hortensia
        >
        > That BA tactic is older still. In 2000 Sulla attacked Marcius Rex as a candidate for censor, saying that he, Sulla, would be unable to work with someone who was not a native speaker of English. Marcius Rex is an Austrian ambassador to the EU and was a professor of law at Vienna. His English outshown most of us "native" speakers. Such attacks as have been made over the years by Sulla, Fabius Maximus, and now Cato have been more of an embarassment to Nova Roma for their pettiness and meanness of character. It is counter-productive to our Citizens working together, and it has often appeared to be their very intent to thwarth Nova Roma from progressing.
        >
        > What funny accent? I didn't notice it. Ni hun hao.
        >
        > Vale optime
        > M. Moravius
        >
        >
        > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "rory12001" <rory12001@> wrote:
        > >
        > > Salve Scaeva;
        > > this is an old tactic from the BA crowd,back in 2004, I think Apulus Caesar was running for office and Q. Fabius Maximus made fun of his English.
        > > Trying to embarass someone who is speaking and making efforts in various languages is just plain bad manners. When we told Fabius Maximus to do better in Italian the gibberish he wrote had the ML laughing.
        > >
        > > You can believe I've been teased for my aberrant American patois in Ireland, saying such peculiar things as 'gas' for 'petrol' and my funny New York accent, no less England! And now the U.S. South.
        > >
        > > I'm learning Latin & making mistakes, thats the way to success, thinking now of trying Mandarin Chinese too.
        > >
        > > Num Iste Cato est sapientior quam Plato;-)
        > >
        > > lol, optime vale
        > > Maior
        > >
        > > >
        > > > Salve Cato,
        > > >
        > > > My friend, maybe if you had been a little more tactfull in criticizing Dexter's English skills, he may have been less likely to have made a jab at you; IMHO.
        > > >
        > > > Vale,
        > > >
        > > > M.Iulius ScaevaÂ
        > > >
        > > >
        > > >
        > > >
        > > > ________________________________
        > > > From: Cato <catoinnyc@>
        > > > To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
        > > > Sent: Sun, December 20, 2009 10:38:32 PM
        > > > Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Last report of the Senate session.
        > > >
        > > > Â
        > > > Cato Dextero sal.
        > > >
        > > > Who is acting in bad faith if I say I do not understand what you wrote and you immediately laugh and declare the worst?
        > > >
        > > > I give up. The most polite approach in the world will never satisfy your overwhelming need to justify arrogance. Enjoy your year in..."power" .
        > > >
        > > > Optime vale,
        > > >
        > > > Cato
        > > >
        > > > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com, "petronius_dexter" <jfarnoud94@ ...> wrote:
        > > > >
        > > > > C. Petronius C. Catoni s.p.d.,
        > > > >
        > > > > > I'm sorry but I understood almost nothing of what you said regarding the English language.
        > > > >
        > > > > Lol. Moi, je reconnais là votre parfaite mauvaise foi.
        > > > >
        > > > > > At any rate, I am glad to hear that your colleagues will be assisting you in making future reports.
        > > > >
        > > > > I am not the one who will make reports. In this case, it was urgent to give it to the people. I did. The next time will be the next time.
        > > > >
        > > > > Vale.
        > > > >
        > > > > C. Petronius Dexter
        > > > > Tribunus Plebis
        > > > >
        > > >
        > >
        >
        Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72731 From: Cato Date: 2009-12-21
        Subject: Re: Languages (Was: Last report of the Senate session)
        Cato Messalinae sal.

        I agree wholeheartedly - English is an amazing hybrid of so many different languages to begin with that to restrict it artificially would be foolhardy. But, as I noted to Agricola, I do think that there should be certain basic standards - rules of grammar and syntax, if not "style" - for any language, if only to make it intelligible to those learning it for the first time.

        Optime vale,

        Cato

        --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Maxima Valeria Messallina <maximavaleriamessallina@...> wrote:
        >
        > I could not agree more that languages are infused with new life with all the differences. Every time I go to Mexico, I am constantly discovering new dialects and differences in Spanish. I learned most of my Spanish as a child, but all the Spanish I learned as an adult comes out with the distinct acento norte americano. Even so, when Spaniards hears my Spanish, they think I am from Mexico. Mexicans, however, even with my best Spanish know instantly I'm an American and those with well trained ears will correctly ascertain that I am a native Californian.
        > Same in France; I can hear all these wonderfully different accents even though everyone is speaking French and I always ask where the person is from so I can accustom my ear to distinguishing the different dialects and regions. It makes learning new languages fun. Thank goodness we don't all sound the same. How boring would that be!
        > Now I'm going to venture a guess that not everyone in ancient Rome spoke Latin exactly in the same manner. Don't you think there would have been a difference between the Latin of a scholar and that of a farmer? Between a native of Rome and say a native of Capua? Between those who were raised speaking Latin and those who learned it later in life? I'd like to think it made Latin sound as interesting to the ear as all the differences we hear today in English and with all languages everywhere (unless it's a language spoken by a very small group of people living in relative isolation from the rest of the world).
        >  
        > Maxima Valeria Messallina
        Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72732 From: Marcus Iulius Scaeva Date: 2009-12-21
        Subject: Re: language
        Salve Cato,
         
        I'm not sure if it is possible to have a universally upheld standard for languages.   Languages are intrinsically like the people who speak them; organic, living, and therefore always changing, growing, and evolving.
         
        Just food for thought.
         
        Variantis est naturalis.
         
        Vale,
         
        M. Iulius Scaeva
         

         



        From: Cato <catoinnyc@...>
        To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
        Sent: Mon, December 21, 2009 12:46:23 PM
        Subject: [Nova-Roma] language

         

        Cato Agricolae sal.

        Thank you, and yes, even though I dislike the foundations for it, it certainly is fascinating to explore how language changes. It may be a necessity in the new global world we live in (sort of a redundancy, but I think you understand what I mean) that languages will be forced to adapt, and English is - simply by virtue of it place as the current lingua franca - the most obvious and affected so far.

        My first exposure to the fact that English was a separate language (sounds stupid, I know, but I was young) was when I spoke French in France the first time. My French friends thought my "accent" was cute - and I didn't even realize that I *had* an accent - an American one! I found it fascinating that, exactly as an American can recognize, say, a German or French accent when they speak English, to all those other countries we have an accent too. Again, it sounds silly, but I had never even considered my own language in that way.

        I don't want to have sounded harsh, but I think there *should* be a universally- upheld standard for languages, English included.

        Now, a question that might be posed is can we say that there is a single definitive "accent" for Latin, as there are no longer any native speakers? I must suppose that a French person - like Albucius - would speak Latin slightly differently than Severus - who in turn would speak it slightly differently than Lentulus, being Hungarian, or Sabinus, being Romanian.

        Vale,

        Cato

        Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72733 From: petronius_dexter Date: 2009-12-21
        Subject: Re: Last report of the Senate session.
        C. Petronius C. Catoni s.p.d,

        >>> When I did not understand what he was trying to say, I apologized and said so. I don't know how more tactful I needed to be.<<<

        A mon humble avis, agir avec tact aurait été de n'en rien dire. Je sais fort bien ce que vaut mon anglais.

        Ceci dit, si le rapport tribunicien est si officiel qu'il doive être écrit dans l'anglais le plus pur, où en trouve-t-on trace? Dans quelles archives d'état se trouvent tous les rapports des tribuns?

        Optime vale.

        C. Petronius Dexter
        Group: Nova-Roma Message: 72734 From: Ass.Pomerium Date: 2009-12-21
        Subject: Un augurio di buone feste dall'associazione Pomerium - Merry Xmas an
        Attachments :

           

           

           

          (L'albero natalizio del Monte Ingino e il Teatro romano di Gubbio)

           

          Ti ricordiamo che, in vendita sul nostro sito (http://www.pomerium.org/prodotti/calendario.htm) o in omaggio con l’iscrizione (su http://www.pomerium.org/iscrizione.htm), riceverai il calendario tradizionale romano, ampiamente corredato di  descrizioni sulla datazione antica, sulle festività di ogni mese ed altre interessanti notizie ed aneddoti.

           

          Buone feste! Io Saturnalia!

           


          Per info rmazioni:
          Associazione Pomerium - www.pomerium.org
          c/o Marocco F. - Viale Alessandrino 477 - 00172 Roma

          info@pomerium.org - amministrazione@pomerium.orgsegreteria@pomerium.org