Selected messages in Nova-Roma group. May 1-30, 2010

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75734 From: petronius_dexter Date: 2010-05-01
Subject: Re: papyrus of a Roman letter
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75735 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2010-05-01
Subject: Re: papyrus of a Roman letter
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75736 From: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com Date: 2010-05-01
Subject: Reminder Ludi Apollinares, 5/1/2010, 12:00 pm
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75737 From: petronius_dexter Date: 2010-05-01
Subject: Re: papyrus of a Roman letter
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75738 From: marcushoratius Date: 2010-05-01
Subject: KALENDAE MAIAE: Lares Praestites; Bona Dea on the Aventine
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75739 From: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com Date: 2010-05-01
Subject: After every Kalends, Nones, Ides, the next day is "Ater", 5/2/2010,
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75740 From: rory12001 Date: 2010-05-02
Subject: Re: papyrus of a Roman letter
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75741 From: marcushoratius Date: 2010-05-02
Subject: a. d. VI Nonas Maias: Floralia
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75742 From: petronius_dexter Date: 2010-05-02
Subject: Re: papyrus of a Roman letter
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75743 From: publiusalbucius Date: 2010-05-03
Subject: Apices and circular discussions
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75744 From: marcushoratius Date: 2010-05-03
Subject: a. d. V Nonas Maias: Rex Tullus Hostilius
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75745 From: Ass.Pomerium Date: 2010-05-03
Subject: 26 maggio 2010: "Perambulatio Aquae Claudiae" (ovvero, la II edizio
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75746 From: Maxima Valeria Messallina Date: 2010-05-03
Subject: Oath of Office
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75747 From: Publius Memmius Albucius Date: 2010-05-03
Subject: Quaestors' assignment
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75748 From: C.Maria Caeca Date: 2010-05-03
Subject: Nashville, TN cives?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75749 From: Vedius Date: 2010-05-03
Subject: Meet and greet this Wednesday in NJ!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75750 From: rory12001 Date: 2010-05-03
Subject: Re: Nashville, TN cives?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75751 From: marcushoratius Date: 2010-05-04
Subject: a. d. IV Nonas Maias: The War with Alba Longa
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75752 From: Maxima Valeria Messallina Date: 2010-05-04
Subject: Re: Nashville, TN cives?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75753 From: gaiuspopilliuslaenas Date: 2010-05-04
Subject: Re: Nashville, TN cives?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75754 From: marcushoratius Date: 2010-05-05
Subject: a. d. III Nonas Maias: Hercules
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75755 From: Maxima Valeria Messallina Date: 2010-05-05
Subject: Re: Nashville, TN cives?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75756 From: L. Livia Plauta Date: 2010-05-05
Subject: Re: a. d. III Nonas Maias: Hercules
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75757 From: galerius_of_rome Date: 2010-05-05
Subject: Interesting Link!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75758 From: Vedius Date: 2010-05-05
Subject: Re: Interesting Link!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75759 From: mcorvvs Date: 2010-05-05
Subject: Re: Interesting Link!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75760 From: Robert Levee Date: 2010-05-05
Subject: Re: Interesting Link!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75761 From: marcushoratius Date: 2010-05-06
Subject: Pridie Nonas Maias: The Roman seige of Sparta
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75762 From: marcushoratius Date: 2010-05-06
Subject: Re: a. d. III Nonas Maias: Hercules
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75763 From: Belle Morte Date: 2010-05-06
Subject: Change Of E-mail
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75764 From: Vedius Date: 2010-05-06
Subject: Temple of Cybele in Legal Trouble
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75765 From: C.Maria Caeca Date: 2010-05-06
Subject: Re: Temple of Cybele in Legal Trouble
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75766 From: rory12001 Date: 2010-05-06
Subject: Re: Temple of Cybele in Legal Trouble
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75767 From: C.Maria Caeca Date: 2010-05-07
Subject: Re: Temple of Cybele in Legal Trouble
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75768 From: galerius_of_rome Date: 2010-05-07
Subject: Resignation!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75769 From: marcushoratius Date: 2010-05-07
Subject: NONAE MAIAE: Mola Salsa; Battle of Metaurus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75770 From: marcushoratius Date: 2010-05-07
Subject: Sacrum Iunonis Covellae
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75771 From: Kirsteen Wright Date: 2010-05-07
Subject: Re: Resignation!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75772 From: marcus.lucretius Date: 2010-05-07
Subject: New edition of Claridge's archaeological guide to Rome will be out s
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75773 From: L. Livia Plauta Date: 2010-05-07
Subject: Re: Resignation!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75774 From: L. Livia Plauta Date: 2010-05-07
Subject: Re: Temple of Cybele in Legal Trouble
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75775 From: C.Maria Caeca Date: 2010-05-07
Subject: Re: Resignation!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75776 From: Robert Levee Date: 2010-05-07
Subject: Re: Temple of Cybele in Legal Trouble
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75777 From: Christer Edling Date: 2010-05-07
Subject: Re: Resignation!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75778 From: rory12001 Date: 2010-05-07
Subject: Re: Resignation!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75779 From: galerius_of_rome Date: 2010-05-07
Subject: My Sincere Appreciation!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75780 From: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com Date: 2010-05-08
Subject: Reminder Ludi Apollinares, 5/8/2010, 12:00 pm
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75781 From: marcushoratius Date: 2010-05-08
Subject: a. d. VIII Eidus Maiae: Mens; Tullus Hostilius and the Fetiales
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75782 From: fauxrari Date: 2010-05-09
Subject: Re: Temple of Cybele in Legal Trouble
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75783 From: marcushoratius Date: 2010-05-09
Subject: a. d. VII Eidus Maiae: LEMURIA
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75784 From: enodia2002 Date: 2010-05-09
Subject: Re: Temple of Cybele in Legal Trouble
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75785 From: C.Maria Caeca Date: 2010-05-09
Subject: Re: Temple of Cybele in Legal Trouble
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75786 From: Vedius Date: 2010-05-09
Subject: Re: Temple of Cybele in Legal Trouble
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75787 From: Cato Date: 2010-05-09
Subject: Re: Temple of Cybele in Legal Trouble
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75788 From: C.Maria Caeca Date: 2010-05-09
Subject: Re: Temple of Cybele in Legal Trouble
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75789 From: Cato Date: 2010-05-09
Subject: Re: Temple of Cybele in Legal Trouble
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75790 From: Vedius Date: 2010-05-09
Subject: Re: Temple of Cybele in Legal Trouble
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75791 From: rory12001 Date: 2010-05-09
Subject: Re: Temple of Cybele in Legal Trouble
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75792 From: Vedius Date: 2010-05-09
Subject: Re: Temple of Cybele in Legal Trouble
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75793 From: C.Maria Caeca Date: 2010-05-09
Subject: Re: Temple of Cybele in Legal Trouble
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75794 From: rory12001 Date: 2010-05-09
Subject: Re: Temple of Cybele in Legal Trouble
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75795 From: C.Maria Caeca Date: 2010-05-09
Subject: Re: Temple of Cybele in Legal Trouble
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75796 From: rory12001 Date: 2010-05-09
Subject: Re: Temple of Cybele in Legal Trouble
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75797 From: marcushoratius Date: 2010-05-10
Subject: a. d. VI Eidus Maiae: Rosalia; divus Claudius II
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75798 From: Cato Date: 2010-05-10
Subject: Re: Temple of Cybele in Legal Trouble
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75799 From: Gaius Lucretius Seneca Date: 2010-05-10
Subject: Re: Temple of Cybele in Legal Trouble
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75800 From: Cato Date: 2010-05-10
Subject: CALL FOR ELECTIONS
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75801 From: Vedius Date: 2010-05-10
Subject: A Virtual Rome (as Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: Temple of Cybele in Legal Tro
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75802 From: C.Maria Caeca Date: 2010-05-10
Subject: Re: A Virtual Rome (as Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: Temple of Cybele in Legal
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75804 From: nathan_jeffrey_allen Date: 2010-05-10
Subject: Scribe? To All Magistrates!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75805 From: Eric Broadhead Date: 2010-05-10
Subject: (no subject)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75806 From: rory12001 Date: 2010-05-10
Subject: America Boreoccidentalis
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75807 From: C.Maria Caeca Date: 2010-05-10
Subject: Re: (unknown)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75808 From: marcushoratius Date: 2010-05-11
Subject: a. d. V Eidus Maiae: LEMURIA
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75809 From: Maxima Valeria Messallina Date: 2010-05-11
Subject: Re: CALL FOR ELECTIONS
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75810 From: valeriuschlorus Date: 2010-05-11
Subject: A Virtual Rome (as Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: Temple of Cybele in Legal Tro
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75811 From: marcushoratius Date: 2010-05-12
Subject: a. d. IV Eidus Maiae: Mars Ultor; Moles of Mars
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75812 From: Gaius Lucretius Seneca Date: 2010-05-12
Subject: Re: A Virtual Rome (as Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: Temple of Cybele in Legal
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75813 From: titusaureliusilerges Date: 2010-05-12
Subject: (Ressurecting?) a Mithras Sodalites/Interest Group
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75814 From: rory12001 Date: 2010-05-13
Subject: Re: (Ressurecting?) a Mithras Sodalites/Interest Group
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75815 From: Cn. Cornelius Lentulus Date: 2010-05-13
Subject: R: [Nova-Roma] (Ressurecting?) a Mithras Sodalites/Interest Group
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75816 From: Cn. Cornelius Lentulus Date: 2010-05-13
Subject: Re: A Virtual Rome (as Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: Temple of Cybele in Legal
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75817 From: marcushoratius Date: 2010-05-13
Subject: a. d. III Eidus Maiae: LEMURIA
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75818 From: Christer Edling Date: 2010-05-13
Subject: Re: CALL FOR ELECTIONS
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75819 From: Maxima Valeria Messallina Date: 2010-05-13
Subject: Test
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75820 From: fauxrari Date: 2010-05-13
Subject: Re: (Ressurecting?) a Mithras Sodalites/Interest Group
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75821 From: Titus aurelius Ilerges Date: 2010-05-13
Subject: Re: R: [Nova-Roma] (Ressurecting?) a Mithras Sodalites/Interest Grou
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75822 From: marcushoratius Date: 2010-05-14
Subject: Pridie Eidus Maiae: The Argei
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75823 From: marcushoratius Date: 2010-05-14
Subject: Responsum augurum de tripudio consularis
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75824 From: Cato Date: 2010-05-14
Subject: Re: Responsum augurum de tripudio consularis
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75825 From: Maxima Valeria Messallina Date: 2010-05-14
Subject: Results of the Senate Meeting of April 2763 auc.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75826 From: Gnaeus Iulius Caesar Date: 2010-05-14
Subject: Re: Responsum augurum de tripudio consularis
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75827 From: Publius Memmius Albucius Date: 2010-05-14
Subject: "Responsum augurum de tripudio consularis"
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75828 From: marcushoratius Date: 2010-05-14
Subject: Re: Responsum augurum de tripudio consularis
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75829 From: Publius Ullerius Stephanus Venator Date: 2010-05-14
Subject: Re: Results of the Senate Meeting of April 2763 auc.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75830 From: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com Date: 2010-05-15
Subject: Reminder Ludi Apollinares, 5/15/2010, 12:00 pm
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75831 From: marcushoratius Date: 2010-05-15
Subject: IDUS MAIAE: MERCURIALIA
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75832 From: Sabinus Date: 2010-05-15
Subject: Mercuralia - Sacrifice to Mercurius.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75833 From: Maxima Valeria Messallina Date: 2010-05-15
Subject: The Drowning of the Dummies and one hungry fish...
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75834 From: Maxima Valeria Messallina Date: 2010-05-15
Subject: Re: Results of the Senate Meeting of April 2763 auc.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75835 From: petronius_dexter Date: 2010-05-15
Subject: Re: Mercuralia - Sacrifice to Mercurius.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75836 From: Publius Ullerius Stephanus Venator Date: 2010-05-15
Subject: To Messallina, was Re: [Nova-Roma] Results of...
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75837 From: C.Maria Caeca Date: 2010-05-16
Subject: thoughts on the recent past ...
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75838 From: marcushoratius Date: 2010-05-16
Subject: a. d. XVII Kalendas Iunonias: Veii and the Alban Lake
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75839 From: marcushoratius Date: 2010-05-16
Subject: Re: "Responsum augurum de tripudio consularis"
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75840 From: Cato Date: 2010-05-16
Subject: Re: "Responsum augurum de tripudio consularis"
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75841 From: rory12001 Date: 2010-05-16
Subject: Re: "Responsum augurum de tripudio consularis"
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75842 From: Cato Date: 2010-05-16
Subject: Re: "Responsum augurum de tripudio consularis"
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75843 From: marcus.lucretius Date: 2010-05-16
Subject: Re: "Responsum augurum de tripudio consularis"
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75844 From: Cato Date: 2010-05-16
Subject: Re: "Responsum augurum de tripudio consularis"
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75845 From: L. Livia Plauta Date: 2010-05-16
Subject: Re: [ReligioRomana] The Drowning of the Dummies and one hungry fish.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75846 From: iulius sabinus Date: 2010-05-16
Subject: Re: Results of the Senate Meeting of April 2763 auc.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75847 From: Publius Ullerius Stephanus Venator Date: 2010-05-16
Subject: Re: Results of the Senate Meeting of April 2763 auc.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75848 From: L. Livia Plauta Date: 2010-05-16
Subject: Re: Results of the Senate Meeting of April 2763 auc.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75849 From: Maxima Valeria Messallina Date: 2010-05-16
Subject: Re: Results of the Senate Meeting of April 2763 auc.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75850 From: rory12001 Date: 2010-05-16
Subject: Re: Results of the Senate Meeting of April 2763 auc.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75851 From: petronius_dexter Date: 2010-05-16
Subject: Re: Results of the Senate Meeting of April 2763 auc.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75852 From: L. Livia Plauta Date: 2010-05-16
Subject: Re: Results of the Senate Meeting of April 2763 auc.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75853 From: gualterus_graecus Date: 2010-05-16
Subject: Re: "Responsum augurum de tripudio consularis"
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75854 From: marcus.lucretius Date: 2010-05-16
Subject: Re: "Responsum augurum de tripudio consularis"
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75855 From: C.Maria Caeca Date: 2010-05-16
Subject: new cntact info ...(OT?)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75856 From: Cato Date: 2010-05-16
Subject: Re: "Responsum augurum de tripudio consularis"
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75857 From: Q. Caecilius Metellus Date: 2010-05-17
Subject: De Responso Auguris de Tripudio Consulare
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75858 From: marcushoratius Date: 2010-05-17
Subject: a. d. XVI Kalendas Iunonias: Triumph of Camillus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75859 From: marcushoratius Date: 2010-05-17
Subject: Re: "Responsum augurum de tripudio consularis"
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75860 From: L. Livia Plauta Date: 2010-05-17
Subject: Re: a. d. XVI Kalendas Iunonias: Triumph of Camillus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75861 From: rory12001 Date: 2010-05-17
Subject: Re: De Responso Auguris de Tripudio Consulare
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75862 From: Cato Date: 2010-05-17
Subject: Re: De Responso Auguris de Tripudio Consulare
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75863 From: Cato Date: 2010-05-17
Subject: Re: "Responsum augurum de tripudio consularis"
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75864 From: gualterus_graecus Date: 2010-05-18
Subject: Re: "Responsum augurum de tripudio consularis"
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75865 From: C. Curius Saturninus Date: 2010-05-18
Subject: Programmers, web-developers and graphic designers needed for NR web
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75866 From: marcushoratius Date: 2010-05-18
Subject: a/ d. XV Kalendas Iunonias: Death of Brutus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75867 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2010-05-19
Subject: Latin classes--again
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75868 From: marcushoratius Date: 2010-05-19
Subject: a. d. XIV Kalendas Iunonias: Valerius Poplicola; Sabine Wars
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75869 From: Maxima Valeria Messallina Date: 2010-05-19
Subject: Re: new cntact info ...(OT?)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75870 From: marcushoratius Date: 2010-05-20
Subject: a. d. XIII Kalendas Iunonias: Naevius Attius
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75871 From: tibrvtvs Date: 2010-05-20
Subject: REAL NOVA ROMAN VILLAGE
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75872 From: lucius_aelius_paetus Date: 2010-05-20
Subject: Re: REAL NOVA ROMAN VILLAGE
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75873 From: iulius sabinus Date: 2010-05-20
Subject: Re: REAL NOVA ROMAN VILLAGE
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75874 From: rory12001 Date: 2010-05-20
Subject: Re: REAL NOVA ROMAN VILLAGE
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75875 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2010-05-20
Subject: Re: REAL NOVA ROMAN VILLAGE
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75876 From: Christer Edling Date: 2010-05-20
Subject: PROGRAM of the FIRST INTERNATIONAL CONSULAR CONVENTUS IN ROME - URBS
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75877 From: rory12001 Date: 2010-05-20
Subject: Philosophy is fashionable
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75878 From: Maxima Valeria Messallina Date: 2010-05-20
Subject: Re: REAL NOVA ROMAN VILLAGE
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75880 From: marcushoratius Date: 2010-05-21
Subject: a. d. XII Kalendas Iunonias: AGONALIA
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75881 From: Cn. Cornelius Lentulus Date: 2010-05-21
Subject: Tomorrow: NR Floralia Carnival in Aquincum (Budapest, Hungary)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75882 From: C.Maria Caeca Date: 2010-05-21
Subject: Re: Tomorrow: NR Floralia Carnival in Aquincum (Budapest, Hungary)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75883 From: petronius_dexter Date: 2010-05-22
Subject: Re: Tomorrow: NR Floralia Carnival in Aquincum (Budapest, Hungary)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75884 From: marcus.lucretius Date: 2010-05-22
Subject: Re: Tomorrow: NR Floralia Carnival in Aquincum (Budapest, Hungary)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75885 From: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com Date: 2010-05-22
Subject: Reminder Ludi Apollinares, 5/22/2010, 12:00 pm
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75886 From: marcushoratius Date: 2010-05-22
Subject: a. d. XI Kalendas Iunonias: Death of Constantine
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75888 From: gualterus_graecus Date: 2010-05-22
Subject: Re: a. d. XI Kalendas Iunonias: Death of Constantine
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75889 From: marcushoratius Date: 2010-05-23
Subject: a. d. X Kalendas Iunonias: TUBILUSTRUM; Volcanus and Maia
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75890 From: marcushoratius Date: 2010-05-24
Subject: a. d. IX Kalendas Iunonias: Q. R. C. F.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75891 From: marcushoratius Date: 2010-05-26
Subject: a. d. VIII Kalendas Iunonias: Fortuna Primigenia; Fors Fortuna; Fort
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75892 From: marcushoratius Date: 2010-05-26
Subject: a. d. VII Kalendas Iunonias: Dea Dia; Sacred Grove of the Fratres Ar
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75893 From: rory12001 Date: 2010-05-26
Subject: Announcers needed; new Vox Romana podcast!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75894 From: marcushoratius Date: 2010-05-27
Subject: a. d. VI Kalendas Iunonias: The Di Penates; Banquet of the Fratres A
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75895 From: luciaiuliaaquila Date: 2010-05-27
Subject: Winning Entries Ludi Megalenses 2763 AUC April 2010
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75896 From: luciaiuliaaquila Date: 2010-05-27
Subject: Winning Entry: Gaius Petronius Dexter - Theatrical Comedy Sketch
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75897 From: luciaiuliaaquila Date: 2010-05-27
Subject: Second Place Entry: Marcus Minucius Audens Theatrical Comedy Sketch
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75898 From: rory12001 Date: 2010-05-28
Subject: Re: Winning Entry: Gaius Petronius Dexter - Theatrical Comedy Sketch
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75899 From: marcushoratius Date: 2010-05-28
Subject: a. d. V Kalendas Iunonias: The Sacred Grove of the Dea Dia
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75900 From: marcushoratius Date: 2010-05-28
Subject: Explorator 13.05
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75901 From: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com Date: 2010-05-29
Subject: Reminder Ludi Apollinares, 5/29/2010, 12:00 pm
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75902 From: marcushoratius Date: 2010-05-29
Subject: a. d. IV Kalendas Iunonias: Sacra Deae Diae; Battle of Argentovaria
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75903 From: Timothy or Stephen Gallagher Date: 2010-05-29
Subject: In Honor of Memorial day in the USA
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75904 From: Maxima Valeria Messallina Date: 2010-05-29
Subject: Re: Winning Entries Ludi Megalenses 2763 AUC April 2010
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75905 From: Cato Date: 2010-05-29
Subject: Re: In Honor of Memorial day in the USA
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75906 From: M Iul Perusianus Date: 2010-05-29
Subject: I: [NR_Urbs] R:EDICTVM AEDILICIVM VII - DE TABVLARIO ET ALBO CIVIVM
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75907 From: rory12001 Date: 2010-05-29
Subject: the devotio, examples of Roman valor in war
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75908 From: marcushoratius Date: 2010-05-30
Subject: a. d. III Kalendas Iunonias: Ludi Tarentini
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75909 From: marcushoratius Date: 2010-05-30
Subject: Conclusion of the Sessions of the Collegium Pontificum
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75910 From: Maxima Valeria Messallina Date: 2010-05-30
Subject: Re: Conclusion of the Sessions of the Collegium Pontificum
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75911 From: Christer Edling Date: 2010-05-30
Subject: Re: Conclusion of the Sessions of the Collegium Pontificum
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75912 From: rory12001 Date: 2010-05-30
Subject: Re: Conclusion of the Sessions of the Collegium Pontificum



Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75734 From: petronius_dexter Date: 2010-05-01
Subject: Re: papyrus of a Roman letter
C. Petronius Liviae Plautae s.p.d.,

> Someone more erudite surely can tell us when the dots started appearing. Fact is, the writer of this papyrus had better calligraphy than most.

In the book of Catherine Salles "Lire à Rome", we can find many facsimile. If I believe her the writing of this papyrus is not in cursive but in semi-cursive. Because the letters are separated and well written.

But I am happy to see that the Romans did not use apices nor macrons, as I do. ;o)

Optime vale.

C. Petronius Dexter
Arcoiali scribebat
Kalendis Maiis P. Memmio K. Fabio II coss.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75735 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2010-05-01
Subject: Re: papyrus of a Roman letter
>
> A. Tullia Scholastica C. Petronio quiritibus, sociis, peregrinisque bonae
> voluntatis S.P.D.
>
>
>
> C. Petronius Liviae Plautae s.p.d.,
>
>> > Someone more erudite surely can tell us when the dots started appearing.
>> Fact is, the writer of this papyrus had better calligraphy than most.
>
> In the book of Catherine Salles "Lire à Rome", we can find many facsimile. If
> I believe her the writing of this papyrus is not in cursive but in
> semi-cursive. Because the letters are separated and well written.
>
> But I am happy to see that the Romans did not use apices nor macrons, as I do.
> ;o)
>
>
> ATS: You are wrong, amice; the Romans DID use the apex, though they were
> inconsistent about this matter. They did not use macrons, which seem to be a
> more modern convention. I haven¹t checked this link yet (for examination
> writing and correction beckon, along with an anticipated visitor from afar),
> but there are several preserved Roman documents with the apex present. You
> will see some of them if you take Sermo, or even Rudimenta, if we can offer
> that again. Initiation into these mysteries requires the presence of the
> observer in our classes...
>
> Optime vale.
>
> C. Petronius Dexter
> Arcoiali scribebat
> Kalendis Maiis P. Memmio K. Fabio II coss.
>
> Optime vale et valete.
>
>
>




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75736 From: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com Date: 2010-05-01
Subject: Reminder Ludi Apollinares, 5/1/2010, 12:00 pm
Reminder from:   Nova-Roma Yahoo! Group
 
Title:   Reminder Ludi Apollinares
 
Date:   Saturday May 1, 2010
Time:   12:00 pm - 1:00 pm
Repeats:   This event repeats every week until Friday July 9, 2010.
Location:   Ludi Apollinares
Notes:   Don't forget to be inspired and start your project for the Ludi honoring Apollo!

http://www.novaroma.org/nr/MMDCCLXIII/Ludi_Apollinares
 
Copyright © 2010  Yahoo! Inc. All Rights Reserved | Terms of Service | Privacy Policy
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75737 From: petronius_dexter Date: 2010-05-01
Subject: Re: papyrus of a Roman letter
C. Petronius Scholasticae s.p.d.,

> ATS: You are wrong, amice; the Romans DID use the apex, though they were inconsistent about this matter.

We yet had this discussion. Quintilianus himself was against some abuses. The Romans did not use apices, this use was only a scholar one, followed by some ancient teachers but without rules well defined nor accepted by all.

And the tradition did not conserve that. None monk, for example, copied manuscripts with those apices. In the book of Catherine Salles in which are many facsimile of Roman letter rests none had apices nor macrons.

Optime vale.

C. Petronius Dexter
Arcoiali scribebat
Kalendis Maiis P. Memmio K. Fabio II coss.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75738 From: marcushoratius Date: 2010-05-01
Subject: KALENDAE MAIAE: Lares Praestites; Bona Dea on the Aventine
M. Moravius Piscinus cultoribus Deorum et omnibus salutem plurimam dicit: Di vos salvas et servatas volunt.

Hodie est Kalendae Maesiae; haec dies fastus est: DIE SEPTIMI TE KALO, IUNO COVELLA: Floralia; Laribus; Bonae Deae in Aventino; lustratio ad flumen Casilino; hoc biduo sol unam dicitur tenere particulam, Sucula cum sole exoritur.

The month of May is sacred to Maia or, by another account, to Apollo (CIL 6, 2305). The same source tells us that this is the month when a lustratio was performed around fields as Cato advised in De Agricultura (141). May holds a number of festivals for the Manes. The most important of these are the three days of Lemuria later in the month. But tonight would see a special ceremony where lamps were lit at the tombs of the ancestors.


Lares Praestites

In conjunction with the ceremony of this evening, today's ludi celebrates the dedication of the Temple of the Lares Praestites by Augustus, circa 16 BCE, "at the highest point of the Sacra Via" (Fasti Venusia, Apulia, CIL 9.421; Res Gestae Divi Augusti 19). The altar of the Lares Praestites was said to have been first dedicated by King Titus Tatius (Ovidius Naso, Fasti 5.129-132; Terrentius Varro, Lingua Latinae 5.74) They were depicted as two young men, possibly in reference to Romulus and Remus, or else to Titus Tatius and Romulus when they were both Kings, wearing dog-skins and bearing spears. At their feet was a dog.

"Why is a dog placed beside the Lares that men call by the special name of praestites, and why are the Lares themselves clad in dog-skins? Is it because 'those that stand before' are termedpraestites, and, also because it is fitting that those who stand before a house should be its guardians, terrifying to strangers, but gentle and mild to those who live there, even as are dogs? Or is it the truth rather, as some Romans affirm, that, just as the philosophic school of Chrysippus think that evil spirits stalk about whom the Gods use as executioners and avengers upon unholy and unjust men, even so the Lares are spirits of punishment like Furies and supervisors of men's lives and houses? Wherefore they are clothed in the skins of dogs and have a dog as their attendant, in the belief that they are skillful in tracking down and following up evil-doers." ~ Plutarch, Roman Questions 51


Bona Dea

Today also commemorates the dedication of the Aventine Temple of the Bona Dea. In 123 BCE Vestal Virgin Licinia added an aedicula, pulvinar, and ara to the Aventine Temple of Bona Dea. Licinia was the daughter of Tribunus Plebis G. Licinius Crassus (145 BCE). In 114 BCE she was condemned on a charge of incestus and put to death, and her dedication of the temple was disavowed (Cicero, Domus 136). No longer a "public temple," exactly, rites were paid to Her none the less, pro populi. Men, for the most part, were prohibited from entering Her temple (G. Aelius Gallus, GRF 18). She had a special sacerdos instead, called the Damiatrix at Rome (Festus p.68M). However, according to Ovid, some men, selected by the Goddess Herself, were allowed into Her temple precinct and on the kalends of May it was the flamen Volcanalis who offered sacrifice. The Bona Dea was so called because She provided the herbs used in medicinal simples. Servius Honoratus in commenting on the Aeneid stated that the true name of the Bona Dea was unknown (8.314), and Lactantus agreed (1.22). Macrobius instead wrote, Hanc eadem Bonam Deam Faunamque et Opem et Fatuam pontificum libris indigitari (Saturnalia 1.12.16). Fatua was the Sabine name for Fauna, while the Samnites called Her Fuusa. Paulus mentions that Her name was Damia among the Messapic tribes east of Tarentum. Among the Marrucini the Bona Dea was called Angitia, Angitina, or Anaceta Ceria. This Daughter of Ceres, like Her counterpart at Rome, had a temple from which medicinal herbs were distributed to women. At Rome Her temple became the main distribution center for abortives, which may have had something to do with the condemnation of Licinia. Her temple was not dedicated again until Livia did so with a restoration of the temple under Augustus. The flamen Vocanalis might have been involved in Her annual rite because, originally, Volcanus was a Roman version of Vertumnus, the God who ripens the earth with inner warmth. Vertumnus is associated with Flora, who appears on the Tavolo Agnone in Samnite territory as Fluusa Kerriiai and where another Goddess is called Futrei Kerriiai, like Marrucini Angitia, the Daughter of Ceres. The rededication by Livia, and this seemingly identification of the Bona Dea and Flora, may explain why the Floralia was expanded in the reign of Augustus to cover these early days of May. By the way, another feature of Her Roman temple had the Bona Dea's sacred herbs guarded by an enormous serpent. And among the Marrucini this day saw a "Procession of the Serpents," which, although now attributed to a Christian saint, is still conducted in some towns of Abruzzo.


At Capua, this day saw a lustratio performed by the banks of the river Casilinus to purify the second largest city of Italy before spring planting.


AUC 1058 / 305 CE: Abdication of Diocletianus and Maximianus

In the system of the Tetrarchy initiated by Diocletian, the two Augusti selected their successors by appointing them Caesari. This was the first time that the system of succession was put into effect. G. Galerius Valerius Maximianus in the East and Fl. Valerius Constantius in the West became Augusti, with Galerius Valerius Maximus Daia, nephew of Galerius, and Fl. Valerius Severus as Caesari. The system quickly began to unravel as young Fl. Valerius Constantinus had to flee from Galerius to his father Constantius in the following year. When Constantius died in July 306, his troops proclaimed his son Constantinus emperor. Meanwhile in Rome, the Praetorians declared Maxentius, the son of Maximianus, as Augustus. Maximianus returned as colleague to his son, and Diocletianus was recalled to resolve all the disputes over who should hold what titles and provinces. Eventually this all led to Constantinus defeating Maxentius at the Milvian Bridge six years later and Licinius defeating Maximinus Daia soon after.


Our thought for today comes from Epictetus, fr. 30:

"A ship ought not to be fixed to one small anchor, nor life to a single hope."
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75739 From: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com Date: 2010-05-01
Subject: After every Kalends, Nones, Ides, the next day is "Ater", 5/2/2010,
Reminder from:   Nova-Roma Yahoo! Group
 
Title:   After every Kalends, Nones, Ides, the next day is "Ater"
 
Date:   Sunday May 2, 2010
Time:   All Day
Repeats:   This event repeats every month.
Notes:   Ater (unlucky)
*Gods or Goddesses should not be invoked by name while indoors, and no celestial God or Goddess should be invoked by name while outdoors.
*Sacrifices should not be made.
*These days are ill-omened to begin any new project since any new project would necessarily begin by performing a rite calling for the assistance of the gods. Such religious rites, beginning something new, are not to be performed.
*Avoid making journeys, or doing anything risky.
NOTA BENE: Normal work would still be performed on dies atri, and as part of performing any work one performs rites for the patron deities, geni locii, and other appropriate deities. Likewise, the daily routine is also performed before the lararium
 
Copyright © 2010  Yahoo! Inc. All Rights Reserved | Terms of Service | Privacy Policy
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75740 From: rory12001 Date: 2010-05-02
Subject: Re: papyrus of a Roman letter
M.Hortensia C. Petronio A. Tulliaeque spd;
but in those days people knew how to speak Latin, or surrounded by them, we do not have that benefit, so the apices are very helpful for speaking.
Romans were traditional yet practical, an apex is a practical help, macron much less so. For those of us who are not erudite Latinists this is necessary...I know I know Petroni, let's think of a future world where everyone speaks Latin & apices will fade away:)

PS. I read over at Facebook that Fr. Reginald Foster might be holding his summer experience!
optime valet
Maior

>
> C. Petronius Scholasticae s.p.d.,
>
> > ATS: You are wrong, amice; the Romans DID use the apex, though they were inconsistent about this matter.
>
> We yet had this discussion. Quintilianus himself was against some abuses. The Romans did not use apices, this use was only a scholar one, followed by some ancient teachers but without rules well defined nor accepted by all.
>
> And the tradition did not conserve that. None monk, for example, copied manuscripts with those apices. In the book of Catherine Salles in which are many facsimile of Roman letter rests none had apices nor macrons.
>
> Optime vale.
>
> C. Petronius Dexter
> Arcoiali scribebat
> Kalendis Maiis P. Memmio K. Fabio II coss.
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75741 From: marcushoratius Date: 2010-05-02
Subject: a. d. VI Nonas Maias: Floralia
M. Moravius Piscinus cultoribus Deorum et omnibus salutem plurimam dicit: Bonam habete Fortunam.

Hodie est ante diem VI Nonas Maias; haec dies fastus aterque est: Floralia in circo; Septentrionales venti.

AUC 515 / 238: Institution of Floralia

"The life led by the ancients was rude and illiterate; still, as will be readily seen, the observations they made were not less remarkable for ingenuity than are the theories of the present day. With them there were three set periods for gathering in the produce of the earth, and it was in honour of these periods that they instituted the festive days, known as the Robigalia, the Floralia, and the Vinalia . . . . The same people also, in the year of the City 513, instituted the Floralia, a festival held upon the fourth before the calends of May (28 April), in accordance with the oracular injunctions of the Sibyl, to secure a favourable season for the blossoms and flowers. Varro fixes this day as the time at which the sun enters the fourteenth degree of Taurus. If there should happen to be a full moon during the four days at this period, injury to the corn and all the plants that are in blossom, will be the necessary result." ~ Plinius Secundus, Historia Naturalis 18.69

Pliny places the year when the Floralia was first instituted as AUC 513 because, like Varro, he reckoned the Founding of Rome from 751 BCE. When first begun, the Floralia was held in the Forum. But it was later moved, in 173 BCE, to the Circus Maximus beneath the Aventine where the Temple of Flora was located. The Floralia, having begun on 28 April, continued today with a release of rabbits and deer into the crowds. Ovid linked this part of the celebration to the fact that Flora is a Goddess of gardens rather than of wild meadows. Thus the offering of rabbits and deer involved calling upon Flora to protect Her flowers. This was also the day on which something more was exhibited.

"When (M. Porcius Cato) was watching Flora's games, put on by Aedilis C. Messius, the people blushed to ask the actresses be stripped naked. When Favonius, a great friend of Cato's who was sitting next to him, told him of this, he left the theatre, not wishing that his presence should interfere with the custom of the show. The people followed him as he went out with tremendous applause and then recalled the ancient mode of merriment back to the stage." ~ Valerius Maximus 2.10.8

Supposedly this custom began with the shows of 173 BCE, where the mime dancers, who were slaves, danced nude. And this gave rise to another custom, for on that day the prostitutes of the City taunted the dancers for not knowing how to move seductively enough. They arose themselves in the stands and began to strip and gyrate. And afterward the Floralia became one of the main festivals adopted by prostitutes as their own. The other was the Vinalia earlier in April.


AUC 361 / 392 BCE: Death of a Censor while in Office

"C. Julius, the censor, died, and M. Cornelius was appointed in his place. This proceeding was afterwards regarded as an offence against religion because it was during that lustrum that Rome was taken, and no one has ever since been appointed as censor in place of another." ~ Titus Livius 5.31

AUC 373 / 380 BCE: Prohibition Against Replacing One Censor

"The censors appointed were C. Sulpicius Camerinius and Sp. Postumius Regillensis. They commenced a fresh assessment, but the work was interrupted by the death of Postumius, because it was doubtful whether the co-optation of a colleague, in the case of the censors, was permissible. Sulpicius accordingly resigned, and fresh magistrates were appointed, but owing to some flaw in their election did not act. Religious fears deterred them from proceeding to a third election; it seemed as though the Gods would not allow a censorship for that year." ~ Titus Livius 6.27


Our thought for today is from Marcus Aurelius, Meditations 3.4.1:

"Do not waste the remainder of thy life in thoughts about other people, when thou dost not refer thy thoughts to some aspect of the common good."
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75742 From: petronius_dexter Date: 2010-05-02
Subject: Re: papyrus of a Roman letter
C. Petronius Maiori s.p.d,

> but in those days people knew how to speak Latin, or surrounded by them, we do not have that benefit, so the apices are very helpful for speaking.

The apices are not helpful for speaking. Because when you speak Latin you have to make long short syllabs by position, and short syllabs never are marked with apices.

The apices are more deceptive than helpful.

> Romans were traditional yet practical, an apex is a practical help, macron much less so.

Macrons are more practical than apices, because macrons can indicate even the short syllabs made long by position as they did in the verses.

> For those of us who are not erudite Latinists this is necessary...

Necessary to what?


Optime vale.

C. Petronius Dexter
Arcoiali scribebat
A. D. VI Nonas Maias P. Memmio K. Fabio II coss.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75743 From: publiusalbucius Date: 2010-05-03
Subject: Apices and circular discussions
Omnibus s.d.

We are wonderful: re-introducing topics which have been already discussed about, with the same arguments, and without any additional information..! ;-)

As I said several months ago, and imho, if apices, accents and stresses may help some of us to better handle Latin, why not? :-)

But it is important that they keep in mind, as Dexter reminds it, that written apices are as natural in Latin that they are in current Chinese, Italian or English for example.

The apices, accents and stresses are just the product of a rather recent fashion, in some scholar circles and in some countries, to introduce a peculiar method writing and reading Latin.

In order to relativize things, let us imagine that some other scholars propose tomorrow to introduce written apices and stresses in Italian, Chinese, or English for the not-native-people who would like to study these languages: this does not mean that English-speaking people daily write their language with such accents, apices, and stresses, does it? ;-)

Valete omnes,



P. Memmius Albucius










--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "petronius_dexter" <jfarnoud94@...> wrote:
>
> C. Petronius Maiori s.p.d,
>
> > but in those days people knew how to speak Latin, or surrounded by them, we do not have that benefit, so the apices are very helpful for speaking.
>
> The apices are not helpful for speaking. Because when you speak Latin you have to make long short syllabs by position, and short syllabs never are marked with apices.
>
> The apices are more deceptive than helpful.
>
> > Romans were traditional yet practical, an apex is a practical help, macron much less so.
>
> Macrons are more practical than apices, because macrons can indicate even the short syllabs made long by position as they did in the verses.
>
> > For those of us who are not erudite Latinists this is necessary...
>
> Necessary to what?
>
>
> Optime vale.
>
> C. Petronius Dexter
> Arcoiali scribebat
> A. D. VI Nonas Maias P. Memmio K. Fabio II coss.
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75744 From: marcushoratius Date: 2010-05-03
Subject: a. d. V Nonas Maias: Rex Tullus Hostilius
M. Moravius Piscinus cultoribus Deorum et omnibus salutem plurimam dicit: Di vos inculumes custodiant

Hodie est ante diem V Nonas Maias; haec dies comitialis: Floralia; Centaurus totus apparet, tempestatem significat.

The circus games for Floralia concluded on this date with sacrifices offered to Flora.


Tullus Hostilius becomes the third Rex of Rome

"The death of Numa was followed by a second interregnum. Then Tullus Hostilius, a grandson of the Hostilius who had fought so brilliantly at the foot of the Citadel against the Sabines, was chosen king by the people, and their choice was confirmed by the senate. He was not only unlike the last king, but he was a man of more warlike spirit even than Romulus, and his ambition was kindled by his own youthful energy and by the glorious achievements of his grandfather. Convinced that the vigour of the State was becoming enfeebled through inaction, he looked all round for a pretext for getting up a war. It so happened that Roman peasants were at that time in the habit of carrying off plunder from the Alban territory, and the Albans from Roman territory. Gaius Cluilius was at the time ruling in Alba. Both parties sent envoys almost simultaneously to seek redress. Tullus had told his ambassadors to lose no time in carrying out their instructions; he was fully aware that the Albans would refuse satisfaction, and so a just ground would exist for proclaiming war. The Alban envoys proceeded in a more leisurely fashion. Tullus received them with all courtesy and entertained them sumptuously. Meantime the Romans had preferred their demands, and on the Alban governor's refusal had declared that war would begin in thirty days. When this was reported to Tullus, he granted the Albans an audience in which they were to state the object of their coming. Ignorant of all that had happened, they wasted time in explaining that it was with great reluctance that they would say anything which might displease Tullus, but they were bound by their instructions; they were come to demand redress, and if that were refused they were ordered to declare war. "Tell your king," replied Tullus, "that the king of Rome calls the Gods to witness that whichever nation is the first to dismiss with ignominy the envoys who came to seek redress, upon that nation they will visit all the sufferings of this war." ~ Titus Livius 1.22


The Sabine Deities

"Feronia, Minerva, the Novensides are from the Sabines. With slight changes we say the following, also from the same people: Pales, Vesta, Salus, Fortuna, Fons, Fides. There is the scent of the speech of the Sabines about the altars also, which by the vow of King Tatius were dedicated at Rome: for, as the Annales tell, he vowed altars to Ops, Flora, Vediovis, and Saturnus, Sol, Luna, Vulcanus, and Summanus, and likewise to Larunda, Terminus, Quirinus, Vertumnus, the Lares, Diana and Lucina." ~ Terrentius Varro, Lingua Latina 5.74

Among the most ancient deities of Rome, attributed to the Sabines by Varro, who was himself from a Sabine gens, are the enigmatic Novensides, or Novensiles. They are rarely found. They appear as the Novesedes in one inscription from Umbria. They appear one time in Livy in what is clearly a very ancient rite, the devotio of Decius Mus in the Latin War of 340 BCE:

"Janus, Jupiter, Father Mars, Quirinus, Bellona, Lares, You divine Novensiles and You divine Indigetes, deities whose power extends over us and over our foes, and to You, too, Divine Manes, I pray, I do You reverence, I crave Your grace and favour will bless the Roman People, the Quirites, with power and victory, and will visit fear, dread and death on the enemies of the Roman People, the Quirites. In like manner as I have uttered this prayer so do I now on behalf of the commonwealth of the Quirites, on behalf of the army, the legions, the auxiliaries of the Roman People, the Quirites, devote the legions and auxiliaries of the enemy, together with myself to Tellus and the Divine Manes." ~ Livy 8.9.6-8

Who the Novensiles may have been evoked some discussion among Roman antiquarians:

"Piso believes that the Novensiles are nine gods, set up among the Sabines at Trebia. Granius thinks that they are the Muses, agreeing with Aelius; Varro teaches that they are nine, because, in doing anything, that number is always reputed most powerful and greatest; Cornificius, that they watch over the renewing of things, because, by their care, all things are afresh renewed in strength, and endure; Manilius, that they are the nine gods to whom alone Jupiter gave power to wield his thunder. Cincius declares them to be deities brought from abroad, named from their very newness, because the Romans were in the habit of sometimes individually introducing into their families the rites of conquered cities, while some they publicly consecrated; and lest, from their great number, or in ignorance, any god should be passed by, all alike were briefly and compendiously invoked under one name - Novensiles." ~ Arnobius 3.38


Our thought for today is from the Golden Sayings of Democritus 6:

"The felicity of a man does not consist either in body or in riches, but in upright conduct and justice."
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75745 From: Ass.Pomerium Date: 2010-05-03
Subject: 26 maggio 2010: "Perambulatio Aquae Claudiae" (ovvero, la II edizio
Un' altra impresa da compiere!



Ecco a voi il secondo appuntamento in mountain bike; dopo il mitico viaggio
dell’anno scorso “Ab Rubicone ad Urbem” sulla Via Flaminia, questa volta una
passeggiata alla portata di tutti... ma non meno carica di fascino e storia.


Dalla Porta Maggiore verso le sorgenti dellÂ’Aqua Claudia, sulle tracce
dellÂ’acquedotto terminato da Claudio nel 52 d.C. attraverso il Parco
dellÂ’Appia Antica, il Parco degli Acquedotti, ecc.

Con noi, in bici, una guida dÂ’eccezione: il prof. W.D. Schram della
Universiteit Utrecht (Olanda) e webmaster del sito
http://www.romanaqueducts.info



Unisciti anche tu al gruppo, una giornata indimenticabile a contatto con la
storia e la natura. Tu, la tua MB, macchina fotografica e tanto spirito
d'avventura.

L'evento si terrà il giorno mercoledi 26 maggio con partenza dalla Porta
Maggiore alle ore 9.



Per informazioni e partecipazione scrivi a <mailto:info@...>
info@...





_____



Per informazioni:
Associazione Pomerium - <http://www.pomerium.org> www.pomerium.org
c/o Marocco F. - Viale Alessandrino 477 - 00172 Roma

<mailto:info@...> info@... -
<mailto:amministrazione@...> amministrazione@... -
<mailto:segreteria@...> segreteria@...



Vive ergo moribus praeteritis, loquere verbis praesentibus (Vivi perciò con
la moralità degli antichi, ma usa le parole della modernità; A.Gellio -
Notti Attiche)





[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75746 From: Maxima Valeria Messallina Date: 2010-05-03
Subject: Oath of Office
Maxima Valeria Messallina omnibus S.P.D.
 
 
"I, Maxima Valeria Messallina (Violet Phearsen), do hereby solemnly swear to uphold the honor of Nova Roma and to act always in the best interests of the people and the Senate of Nova Roma.
As a magistrate of Nova Roma, I, Maxima Valeria Messallina, swear to honor the Gods and Goddesses of Rome in my public dealings and to pursue the Roman Virtues in my public and private life.
I, Maxima Valeria Messallina, swear to uphold and defend the Religio Romana as the State Religion of Nova Roma and swear never to act in a way that would threaten its status as the State Religion.
I, Maxima Valeria Messallina, swear to protect and defend the Constitution of Nova Roma.
I, Maxima Valeria Messallina, further swear to fulfill the obligations and responsibilities of the office of legata pro praetore to the best of my abilities.
On my honor as a Citizen of Nova Roma, and in the presence of the Gods and Goddesses of the Roman people and by their will and favor, do I accept the position of legata pro praetore and all the rights, privileges, obligations, and responsibilities attendant thereto."
 
 
Valete bene in pace Deorum,
 
Maxima Valeria Messallina




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75747 From: Publius Memmius Albucius Date: 2010-05-03
Subject: Quaestors' assignment
Quaestoribus Magistratibus omnibusque s.d.



You will find below the consular edict on the assignment of the yet elected quaestors.



I wish the best to every quaestor in her/his responsibility and the most productive relation with her/his assignment magistrate.



Valete,





Albucius cos.



___________________________________________________________________________




Consular joint edict on the assignment of the quaestors for 2763 a.u.c.

(de designatione quaestorum pro MMDCCLXIII a.u.c.)


We, Publius Memmius Albucius and Caeso Fabius Buteo Quintilianus, consuls, by the authority vested by the constitution, the laws and the Senate of Nova Roma, and in view of the existing rules, specially of the Constitution, in its paragraph IV.A.6 ;



Considering that:

- neither the last annual elections nor the partial election of January 2763 auc have allowed filling all the eight constitutional quaestorial positions;



After the consultation of the interested magistrates on a.d. VI Kal. Apr. 2763 auc, and considering that no objection was made on the proposed assignment;



Considering that:

- the proposal brought by the consuls towards the Comitia centuriata in March-April 2763, in order to reduce from eight to six the number of Nova Roma quaestors has, despite the support of the Senate, not been accepted;

- the organization of an election to fulfill the two missing positions has not been set since last Kal. Apriles;

- the assignment of the elected quaestors must now be issued and as soon as possible,





edict :



Article 1

The six elected quaestors for 2763 auc are assigned as such:

Arria Carina A. : consul Memmius

Vitellius Celsus A. : consul Fabius Buteo

Annaeus Regulus T. : praetura, as the praetrices see fit

Cornelius Gualterus Graecus M. : praetura, as the praetrices see fit

Lucilius Tutor Sex. : aedilis curulis, as the aediles see fit

Maria Caeca G. : aedilis curulis, as the aediles see fit


Article 2



The missions and tasks of each quaestor shall be defined by the assignment magistrate, after consultation and in the respect of the magisterial status of the concerned quaestor.

Quaestores Arria and Vitellius will share, in the frame of an agreement between both consuls and among their various missions to be defined, the budget and finances competency.


Article 3

The present assignments may be reviewed during the current year if the consuls deem necessary to.


Article 4

Every novaroman public officer and her/his departement shall, as far as they are concerned, enforce the present edict, which will be published in the Tabularium Novae Romae and in Nova Roma relevant internet 'discussion' lists, as well as notified to every concerned quaestor and assignment magistrate.





Scripto Condate Scaldi Galliae simul Umeae Thulense,, a.d. V Nonas MMDCCLXIII a.u.c. (3rd May 2010 c.c.) P. Memmio Albucio C. Fabio Buteone Quintiliano iterum coss..



















_________________________________________________________________
Hotmail arrive sur votre t�l�phone ! Compatible Iphone, Windows Phone, Blackberry, �
http://www.messengersurvotremobile.com/?d=Hotmail

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75748 From: C.Maria Caeca Date: 2010-05-03
Subject: Nashville, TN cives?
Salvete omnes,

considering the torrential rains Nashville is experiencing, and the flooding
...I would feel much more easy if our citizens in TN and MS check in, just
to let us know that they are OK.

I do realize that our highest officials will no consider this OT ...but I do
not. You are my people, and I want to *know* that you are safe.

Valete quam optime,
C. Maria Caeca
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75749 From: Vedius Date: 2010-05-03
Subject: Meet and greet this Wednesday in NJ!
Salvete!

There will be a meet-and-greet this coming Wednesday at 7:00 PM in the
Borders Bookstore in the Rockaway Mall, Rockaway, NJ (USA).

All are welcome; the meet-and-greet is open to Nova Roman cives and
non-cives alike, with the goal of not only getting to know one another,
but also to set forth a few goals and ideas for future get-togethers in
the NJ/NY/PA area.

For those with meetup.com accounts (and for those who don't, they're
free), details can be found here:

http://www.meetup.com/greece-and-rome-nj/calendar/13229834/

Looking forward to seeing you there, if you can make it!

Valete,

Flavius Vedius Germanicus
Pater Patriae
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75750 From: rory12001 Date: 2010-05-03
Subject: Re: Nashville, TN cives?
Maior Caecae spd;
why should anyone consider the state of our cives off topic? Julia Aquila posted that she is fine via Facebook & I correspond regulularly with A. Sempronius Regulus who is fine. As for others such as Aurelianus I don't know, but
may the gods favour them
M. Hortensia Maior

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "C.Maria Caeca" <c.mariacaeca@...> wrote:
>
> Salvete omnes,
>
> considering the torrential rains Nashville is experiencing, and the flooding
> ...I would feel much more easy if our citizens in TN and MS check in, just
> to let us know that they are OK.
>
> I do realize that our highest officials will no consider this OT ...but I do
> not. You are my people, and I want to *know* that you are safe.
>
> Valete quam optime,
> C. Maria Caeca
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75751 From: marcushoratius Date: 2010-05-04
Subject: a. d. IV Nonas Maias: The War with Alba Longa
M. Moravius Piscinus cultoribus Deorum et omnibus salutem plurimam dicit: Di vos inculumes custodiant

Hodie est ante diem IIII Nonas Maias; haec dies comitialis:

Tullus Hostilius and the War with Alba Longa

"The Albans reported this at home. Both sides made extraordinary preparations for a war, which closely resembled a civil war between parents and children, for both were of Trojan descent, since Lavinium was an offshoot of Troy, and Alba of Lavinium, and the Romans were sprung from the stock of the kings of Alba. The outcome of the war, however, made the conflict less deplorable, as there was no regular engagement, and though one of the two cities was destroyed, the two nations were blended into one. The Albans were the first to move, and invaded the Roman territory with an immense army. They fixed their camp only five miles from the City and surrounded it with a moat; this was called for several centuries the "Cluilian Dyke" from the name of the Alban general, till through lapse of time the name and the thing itself disappeared. While they were encamped Cluilius, the Alban king, died, and the Albans made Mettius Fufetius dictator. The king's death made Tullus more sanguine than ever of success. He gave out that the wrath of heaven which had fallen first of all on the head of the nation would visit the whole race of Alba with condign punishment for this unholy war. Passing the enemy's camp by a night march, he advanced upon Alban territory. This drew Mettius from his entrenchments. He marched as close to his enemy as he could, and then sent on an officer to inform Tullus that before engaging it was necessary that they should have a conference. If he granted one, then he was satisfied that the matters he would lay before him were such as concerned Rome no less than Alba. Tullus did not reject the proposal, but in case the conference should prove illusory, he led out his men in order of battle. The Albans did the same. After they had halted, confronting each other, the two commanders, with a small escort of superior officers, advanced between the lines. The Alban general, addressing Tullus, said: "I think I have heard our king Cluilius say that acts of robbery and the non-restitution of plundered property, in violation of the existing treaty, were the cause of this war, and I have no doubt that you, Tullus, allege the same pretext. But if we are to say what is true, rather than what is plausible, we must admit that it is the lust of empire which has made two kindred and neighbouring peoples take up arms. Whether rightly or wrongly I do not judge; let him who began the war settle that point; I am simply placed in command by the Albans to conduct the war. But I want to give you a warning, Tullus. You know, you especially who are nearer to them, the greatness of the Etruscan State, which hems us both in; their immense strength by land, still more by sea. Now remember, when once you have given the signal to engage, our two armies will fight under their eyes, so that when we are wearied and exhausted they may attack us both, victor and vanquished alike. If then, not content with the secure freedom we now enjoy, we are determined to enter into a game of chance, where the stakes are either supremacy or slavery, let us, in heaven's name, choose some method by which, without great suffering or bloodshed on either side, it can be decided which nation is to be master of the other." Although, from natural temperament, and the certainty he felt of victory, Tullus was eager to fight, he did not disapprove of the proposal. After much consideration on both sides a method was adopted, for which Fortune herself provided the necessary means.

"There happened to be in each of the armies a triplet of brothers, fairly matched in years and strength. It is generally agreed that they were called Horatii and Curiatii. Few incidents in antiquity have been more widely celebrated, yet in spite of its celebrity there is a discrepancy in the accounts as to which nation each belonged. There are authorities on both sides, but I find that the majority give the name of Horatii to the Romans, and my sympathies lead me to follow them. The kings suggested to them that they should each fight on behalf of their country, and where victory rested, there should be the sovereignty. They raised no objection; so the time and place were fixed. But before they engaged a treaty was concluded between the Romans and the Albans, providing that the nation whose representatives proved victorious should receive the peaceable submission of the other. This is the earliest treaty recorded, and as all treaties, however different the conditions they contain, are concluded with the same forms, I will describe the forms with which this one was concluded as handed down by tradition. The Fetial put the formal question to Tullus: "Do you, King, order me to make a treaty with the Pater Patratus of the Alban nation?" On the king replying in the affirmative, the Fetial said: "I demand of thee, King, some tufts of grass." The king replied: "Take those that are pure." The Fetial brought pure grass from the Citadel. Then he asked the king: "Do you constitute me the plenipotentiary of the People of Rome, the Quirites, sanctioning also my vessels and comrades?" To which the king replied: "So far as may be without hurt to myself and the People of Rome, the Quirites, I do." The Fetial was M. Valerius. He made Spurius Furius the Pater Patratus by touching his head and hair with the grass. Then the Pater Patratus, who is constituted for the purpose of giving the treaty the religious sanction of an oath, did so by a long formula in verse, which it is not worth while to quote. After reciting the conditions he said: "Hear, O Jupiter, hear! thou Pater Patratus of the people of Alba! Hear ye, too, people of Alba! As these conditions have been publicly rehearsed from first to last, from these tablets, in perfect good faith, and inasmuch as they have here and now been most clearly understood, so these conditions the People of Rome will not be the first to go back from. If they shall, in their national council, with false and malicious intent be the first to go back, then do thou, Jupiter, on that day, so smite the People of Rome, even as I here and now shall smite this swine, and smite them so much the more heavily, as thou art greater in power and might." With these words he struck the swine with a flint. In similar wise the Albans recited their oath and formularies through their own dictator and their priests." ~ Titus Livius 1.23-24


AUC 740 / 13 BCE: Theater of Marcellus dedicated.

"On ground purchased for the most part from private owners I built the theatre near the temple of Apollo which was to bear the name of my son-in law Marcus Marcellus." ~ Caesar Augustus, Res Geste

The Theater of Marcellus lies in the Campus Martius. Originally the theater was planned by Julius Caesar as the first stone theater in Rome. He had removed the Temple of Pietas and other shrines, as well as some private houses, to make room for the theater. Marcellus, for whom it came to be named, had died in 23 BCE. Construction on the theater may have begun shortly before his death, but from that point on Augustus made it a memorial for his son-in-law. Construction had advanced where some of the performances for the Ludi Saeculares were held there in 17 BCE. The dedication, according to Cassius Dio, was in 13 BCE, accompanied by games.

"He next dedicated the theatre named after Marcellus. In the course of the festival held for this purpose the patrician boys, including his grandson Gaius, performed the equestrian exercise called 'Troy,' and six hundred wild beasts from Africa were slain. And to celebrate the birthday of Augustus, Iullus, the son of Antony, who was praetor, gave games in the Circus and a slaughter of wild beasts, and entertained both the emperor and the senate, in pursuance of a decree of that body, upon the Capitol." ~ Cass. Dio 54.26.1-2

In 370 CE some of the traventine blocks were taken from the Theater of Marcellus for the restoration of the pons Cestius. This may be when the theater began to be torn down, although parts of it remained for several centuries afterward. Part of an outer wall still stands today.


Today's thought comes from Publilius Syrus, Sententia 610:

"Even the thorn bush is pleasant, from which is seen the rose."
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75752 From: Maxima Valeria Messallina Date: 2010-05-04
Subject: Re: Nashville, TN cives?
Perhaps if Citizens from the affected area who may read this, or other Citizens who are in contact with them, could please post just a quick message to let us know they are all right. The pictures look awful. I pray everyone and their loved ones, pets too, are okay.
 
Maxima Valeria Messallina
 


--- On Mon, 5/3/10, rory12001 <rory12001@...> wrote:


From: rory12001 <rory12001@...>
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Nashville, TN cives?
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Date: Monday, May 3, 2010, 5:55 PM


 



Maior Caecae spd;
why should anyone consider the state of our cives off topic? Julia Aquila posted that she is fine via Facebook & I correspond regulularly with A. Sempronius Regulus who is fine. As for others such as Aurelianus I don't know, but
may the gods favour them
M. Hortensia Maior

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com, "C.Maria Caeca" <c.mariacaeca@ ...> wrote:
>
> Salvete omnes,
>
> considering the torrential rains Nashville is experiencing, and the flooding
> ...I would feel much more easy if our citizens in TN and MS check in, just
> to let us know that they are OK.
>
> I do realize that our highest officials will no consider this OT ...but I do
> not. You are my people, and I want to *know* that you are safe.
>
> Valete quam optime,
> C. Maria Caeca
>











[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75753 From: gaiuspopilliuslaenas Date: 2010-05-04
Subject: Re: Nashville, TN cives?
Salvete Omnes,

I haven't heard anything from Aurelianus or other Nashville cives, but we in Memphis, TN are fine.

We experienced the tornadoes and flooding a day or so before Nashville, but only in certain areas.

Valete,

C. Popillius Laenas
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75754 From: marcushoratius Date: 2010-05-05
Subject: a. d. III Nonas Maias: Hercules
M. Moravius Piscinus cultoribus Deorum et omnibus salutem plurimam dicit: Hercules virtutem in nos addat.

Hodie est ante diem III Nonas Maias; haec dies comitialis est. Idem sidus pluviam significat.

"Hercules, Founder of our city, You who are called Alcidus, in whose footsteps we now reside on this hallowed earth, avert the threatening storms from our land." ~ Silius Italicus Punica 1.505-7

Whever the Gods have walked upon the earth, in Their footsteps, as it were, a numen has remained. Such places may be recognized by the unsuaul lushness of vegetation, the sweetness of the water from its spring, the variety of animals and birds, or the majesty of its vision. The footsteps of the Gods are such places in Nature that naturally evoke awe in us. Hercules, more than most, was said to have traveled around the world, building altars in such locations, and in the process leaving some foot-prints of His own. An altar, enclosed in a short wall, perhaps with a column on which the image of a God or Goddess was posed was called a fanum (pl. fana). "To build a fanum," they say, "is to found a city," and thus Hercules was credited with founding cities throughout the Mediterranean region. At Rome, Hercules was attributed with having built an altar for Jupiter Inventor (Dion. 1.32) with rituals taught to Him by Carmentis. Another fanum attributed to Hercules is that which stood uncharacteristicly on the border between Nola and Avellino. In 183 BCE Rome was called upon to provide an arbitrator to settle a dispute over ownership of the sanctuary.

The Cippus Abellanus (Tavolo Avellino)

"Greater may your bounty grow by this: (By the order of the arbiter), Quaestor (Q. Fabius Labienus) speaking quid pro quo between the King of Avellanus and the ten Medixes (magistrates) of Nola, this is now the law of Avellanus, this is now the law of Nola, by a Consultum of the Senate (of Rome) the law has been established:

"Whereas the Sanctuary of Hercules near this location to which Avellanus has claims to this land, where also near this other place, Nola, has claims to the sanctuary, which lies between their two respective boundaries, straddling their common border, both sides having presented their opinions in proof of their claims, of rites conducted at the Holy Sanctuary, lying on common land, on a common border, has been for the purpose of ensuring the fertility of the land, and that this rite of fructification has also been common to both cities, Avellanus and Nola, . . . Hercules became . . . which one Nola . . . gt . . .

"From this he wanted, to build up the land, he did so without permission. Hercules came to the middle, from outside the city walls. When Hercules himself came to circumscribe around (the sanctuary) across the road behind, also, and afterward through this area. The Senate therefore issues this decision, permitting the sanctuary to be rebuilt. It is to be rebuilt in this manner: Nola is to build up this part and Avellanus is to build up another part for its own use. Also, after this has been completed, it is to be circuited (in a joint rite?) for the mutual benefit of the nearby lands of Avellanus and certainly also the nearby lands of Nola. Also whatever savrum should be discovered on the land which the sanctuary comprises, it should be commonly recognized that that which the one side desires is also what the other side wants, for their mutual benefit. Also between the two places, Avellanus and Nola, the curved roadway (passing through) the middle of the (sanctuary) shall be the border between, but belong to neither."

Nola was originally founded as the city of Hyria in 801 BCE. Its population at its founding was of Greek and a pre-Italic Ausonian people named the Calcidesi. The sanctuary of Hercules predated the arrival of the Greeks in the area, and possibly predated the Calcides as well. Likely it was attributed to some local hero whom the Greeks identified with Herakles. By the time Rome came upon the sanctuary the area was no longer Calcidesian or Greek. Between the eight and the sixth centuries this area came under a Tyrrhenian culture as it expanded east across northern Campania from the sea to the hinterlands. Beginning in the last quarter of the sixth century a wave of Oscan-speaking tribes expanded west out from the valleys of the Apennines (524-474 BCE). The Sabelli followed in another wave of Oscan expansion through Campania (450-420 BCE), Lucania (420-390 BCE), and Bruttia (c. 356 BCE). Hyria was then renamed Nuv-la in Oscan, meaning "New City." In 327 BCE 2000 warriors from Nola and 4000 Samnites set out to capture Neapolis and Palepoli. In the following year, Neapolis expelled its Samnite garrison and allied with Rome. This led to the First Samnte War in 320 BCE, with Rome eventually capturing Nola in 314 BCE. A Second Samnite War concluded by 304 BCE, and the Third Samnite War, concluding in 290 BCE, saw both Nola and Avellino allied to Rome. During the invasion by Hannibal in the Second Punic War, Nola remained allied to Rome while Avellino had defected to the Carthaginians. By 187 BCE when Rome was called upon to arbitrate this dispute she was already the predominate power in the Mediterrannean having defeated Phillip of Macedon at Cynoscephalae and Antiochus III of Syria at Magnesia just a few years earlier. An interesting aspect of the Cippus Abellinus is how it describes Hercules' founding ritual for this sanctuary when compared to the founding ritual said to have been used by Romulus.


The Labors of Hercules

"O Hercules, energetic Alcidean, unwearied after so many labors, so they recall, even so You laid aside Your cares and made delightful play with a tender girl, having forgotten the Nemean lion, and also the Erymanthian boar. What should come afterward? Twisting spindles with Your thumbs, biting smooth the rough threads in Your mouth. Lydian Omphale beat you for repeatedly knotting and breaking the thread with Your rough hands. Often she would lead You as one of her spinning maidens dressed in flowing robes. Your knotty club together with the lion's skin was thrown down to the ground, and Amor danced upon them with light feet. Who would have thought that would come about when as a babe You strangled monstrous serpents with hands that could barely grasp, or when You swiftly cut off the heads of the Hydra as each grew back again? or conquered the savage steeds of Diomede, or when alone You fought the three brothers who shared a common body and contended with six hands?" ~ Anomynous, Elegy to Maecenus 1.57-68

Having overcome such labors, Hercules, after Jupiter alone, was the most popular God in Italia and Hispania. He was called upon to aid people in all situations and to overcome the most difficult problems.

"O Hercules, to whom twelve labors was given, help me, I pray, since you are witness to the accusations made against me." ~ P. Ovidius Naso, Metamorphoses 15.39-40

"Oh that by some accident I would discover an urn full of money! as it did for him who, having found a treasure, bought that very ground he tilled before in the capacity of an hired servant, enriched by Hercules' being his friend." ~ P. Horatius Flaccus, Sermones 2.6

Then, of course with the Romans, Hercules was invoked in games of chance:

"He threw a most losing cast. I took up the dice, and invoked Hercules as my genial patron; I threw a first-rate cast, and pledged him in a bumping cup; in return he drank it off, reclined his head, and fell fast asleep." ~ T. Maccius Plautus, Curculio 358

Tali, or knuckle bones, have only four sides that are marked with pips. The "most losing cast" was the "Volturii quattor," or "Four Vultures," thought to have been four ones, comparable to casting a pair of snake eyes. The f"irst-rate cast" was named after Venus, "Venereus iactus." This was a throw of 2, 3, 4, and 5. As it was by this throw that the Romans chose the King of the Feast, it received the name of "Basilicus," or "the king's throw."

Hercules, as the model of male virtue, was invoked most often as a deity to ensure the future of the family by promoting male fertility. Not unexpectedly He was invoked for athletic competitions, and also Hercules was invoked to join in dances since dancing in public was associated with the male virtue of worshipping the Gods.

"Hail, Hercules, true son of Jove, an added Glory for the Gods are you. Come now, and dance at your holy rites with skillful feet." ~ P. Vergilius Maro, Aeneid 8.301-2


Our thought for the day is from Stobaeus, Ethical Sentences 3:

"Be persuaded that things of a laborious nature contribute more than pleasures to virtue."
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75755 From: Maxima Valeria Messallina Date: 2010-05-05
Subject: Re: Nashville, TN cives?
Salve, Laenas
 
Thank you for letting us know!
 
Vale bene,
 
Maxima Valeria Messallina
 
 


<<--- On Tue, 5/4/10, gaiuspopilliuslaenas <gaiuspopillius@...> wrote:

Salvete Omnes,

I haven't heard anything from Aurelianus or other Nashville cives, but we in Memphis, TN are fine.

We experienced the tornadoes and flooding a day or so before Nashville, but only in certain areas.

Valete,

C. Popillius Laenas>>




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75756 From: L. Livia Plauta Date: 2010-05-05
Subject: Re: a. d. III Nonas Maias: Hercules
L. Livia M. Moravio sal.

Piscine, where do you get the weather information you put into these posts?
You don't always add it, but I noticed that whenever you do it proves to be
completely accurate for Budapest. It's mind-boggling: it's actually more
accurate than a weather forecast.
Of course it rained today.

Optime vale,
Livia

----- Original Message -----
From: "marcushoratius" <MHoratius@...>
To: <Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Wednesday, May 05, 2010 11:57 AM
Subject: [Nova-Roma] a. d. III Nonas Maias: Hercules


M. Moravius Piscinus cultoribus Deorum et omnibus salutem plurimam dicit:
Hercules virtutem in nos addat.

Hodie est ante diem III Nonas Maias; haec dies comitialis est. Idem sidus
pluviam significat.

"Hercules, Founder of our city, You who are called Alcidus, in whose
footsteps we now reside on this hallowed earth, avert the threatening storms
from our land." ~ Silius Italicus Punica 1.505-7

Whever the Gods have walked upon the earth, in Their footsteps, as it were,
a numen has remained. Such places may be recognized by the unsuaul lushness
of vegetation, the sweetness of the water from its spring, the variety of
animals and birds, or the majesty of its vision. The footsteps of the Gods
are such places in Nature that naturally evoke awe in us. Hercules, more
than most, was said to have traveled around the world, building altars in
such locations, and in the process leaving some foot-prints of His own. An
altar, enclosed in a short wall, perhaps with a column on which the image of
a God or Goddess was posed was called a fanum (pl. fana). "To build a
fanum," they say, "is to found a city," and thus Hercules was credited with
founding cities throughout the Mediterranean region. At Rome, Hercules was
attributed with having built an altar for Jupiter Inventor (Dion. 1.32) with
rituals taught to Him by Carmentis. Another fanum attributed to Hercules is
that which stood uncharacteristicly on the border between Nola and Avellino.
In 183 BCE Rome was called upon to provide an arbitrator to settle a dispute
over ownership of the sanctuary.

The Cippus Abellanus (Tavolo Avellino)

"Greater may your bounty grow by this: (By the order of the arbiter),
Quaestor (Q. Fabius Labienus) speaking quid pro quo between the King of
Avellanus and the ten Medixes (magistrates) of Nola, this is now the law of
Avellanus, this is now the law of Nola, by a Consultum of the Senate (of
Rome) the law has been established:

"Whereas the Sanctuary of Hercules near this location to which Avellanus has
claims to this land, where also near this other place, Nola, has claims to
the sanctuary, which lies between their two respective boundaries,
straddling their common border, both sides having presented their opinions
in proof of their claims, of rites conducted at the Holy Sanctuary, lying on
common land, on a common border, has been for the purpose of ensuring the
fertility of the land, and that this rite of fructification has also been
common to both cities, Avellanus and Nola, . . . Hercules became . . . which
one Nola . . . gt . . .

"From this he wanted, to build up the land, he did so without permission.
Hercules came to the middle, from outside the city walls. When Hercules
himself came to circumscribe around (the sanctuary) across the road behind,
also, and afterward through this area. The Senate therefore issues this
decision, permitting the sanctuary to be rebuilt. It is to be rebuilt in
this manner: Nola is to build up this part and Avellanus is to build up
another part for its own use. Also, after this has been completed, it is to
be circuited (in a joint rite?) for the mutual benefit of the nearby lands
of Avellanus and certainly also the nearby lands of Nola. Also whatever
savrum should be discovered on the land which the sanctuary comprises, it
should be commonly recognized that that which the one side desires is also
what the other side wants, for their mutual benefit. Also between the two
places, Avellanus and Nola, the curved roadway (passing through) the middle
of the (sanctuary) shall be the border between, but belong to neither."

Nola was originally founded as the city of Hyria in 801 BCE. Its population
at its founding was of Greek and a pre-Italic Ausonian people named the
Calcidesi. The sanctuary of Hercules predated the arrival of the Greeks in
the area, and possibly predated the Calcides as well. Likely it was
attributed to some local hero whom the Greeks identified with Herakles. By
the time Rome came upon the sanctuary the area was no longer Calcidesian or
Greek. Between the eight and the sixth centuries this area came under a
Tyrrhenian culture as it expanded east across northern Campania from the sea
to the hinterlands. Beginning in the last quarter of the sixth century a
wave of Oscan-speaking tribes expanded west out from the valleys of the
Apennines (524-474 BCE). The Sabelli followed in another wave of Oscan
expansion through Campania (450-420 BCE), Lucania (420-390 BCE), and Bruttia
(c. 356 BCE). Hyria was then renamed Nuv-la in Oscan, meaning "New City." In
327 BCE 2000 warriors from Nola and 4000 Samnites set out to capture
Neapolis and Palepoli. In the following year, Neapolis expelled its Samnite
garrison and allied with Rome. This led to the First Samnte War in 320 BCE,
with Rome eventually capturing Nola in 314 BCE. A Second Samnite War
concluded by 304 BCE, and the Third Samnite War, concluding in 290 BCE, saw
both Nola and Avellino allied to Rome. During the invasion by Hannibal in
the Second Punic War, Nola remained allied to Rome while Avellino had
defected to the Carthaginians. By 187 BCE when Rome was called upon to
arbitrate this dispute she was already the predominate power in the
Mediterrannean having defeated Phillip of Macedon at Cynoscephalae and
Antiochus III of Syria at Magnesia just a few years earlier. An interesting
aspect of the Cippus Abellinus is how it describes Hercules' founding ritual
for this sanctuary when compared to the founding ritual said to have been
used by Romulus.


The Labors of Hercules

"O Hercules, energetic Alcidean, unwearied after so many labors, so they
recall, even so You laid aside Your cares and made delightful play with a
tender girl, having forgotten the Nemean lion, and also the Erymanthian
boar. What should come afterward? Twisting spindles with Your thumbs,
biting smooth the rough threads in Your mouth. Lydian Omphale beat you for
repeatedly knotting and breaking the thread with Your rough hands. Often
she would lead You as one of her spinning maidens dressed in flowing robes.
Your knotty club together with the lion's skin was thrown down to the
ground, and Amor danced upon them with light feet. Who would have thought
that would come about when as a babe You strangled monstrous serpents with
hands that could barely grasp, or when You swiftly cut off the heads of the
Hydra as each grew back again? or conquered the savage steeds of Diomede, or
when alone You fought the three brothers who shared a common body and
contended with six hands?" ~ Anomynous, Elegy to Maecenus 1.57-68

Having overcome such labors, Hercules, after Jupiter alone, was the most
popular God in Italia and Hispania. He was called upon to aid people in all
situations and to overcome the most difficult problems.

"O Hercules, to whom twelve labors was given, help me, I pray, since you are
witness to the accusations made against me." ~ P. Ovidius Naso,
Metamorphoses 15.39-40

"Oh that by some accident I would discover an urn full of money! as it did
for him who, having found a treasure, bought that very ground he tilled
before in the capacity of an hired servant, enriched by Hercules' being his
friend." ~ P. Horatius Flaccus, Sermones 2.6

Then, of course with the Romans, Hercules was invoked in games of chance:

"He threw a most losing cast. I took up the dice, and invoked Hercules as
my genial patron; I threw a first-rate cast, and pledged him in a bumping
cup; in return he drank it off, reclined his head, and fell fast asleep." ~
T. Maccius Plautus, Curculio 358

Tali, or knuckle bones, have only four sides that are marked with pips. The
"most losing cast" was the "Volturii quattor," or "Four Vultures," thought
to have been four ones, comparable to casting a pair of snake eyes. The
f"irst-rate cast" was named after Venus, "Venereus iactus." This was a throw
of 2, 3, 4, and 5. As it was by this throw that the Romans chose the King of
the Feast, it received the name of "Basilicus," or "the king's throw."

Hercules, as the model of male virtue, was invoked most often as a deity to
ensure the future of the family by promoting male fertility. Not
unexpectedly He was invoked for athletic competitions, and also Hercules was
invoked to join in dances since dancing in public was associated with the
male virtue of worshipping the Gods.

"Hail, Hercules, true son of Jove, an added Glory for the Gods are you. Come
now, and dance at your holy rites with skillful feet." ~ P. Vergilius Maro,
Aeneid 8.301-2


Our thought for the day is from Stobaeus, Ethical Sentences 3:

"Be persuaded that things of a laborious nature contribute more than
pleasures to virtue."
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75757 From: galerius_of_rome Date: 2010-05-05
Subject: Interesting Link!
Salve et salvete,

While surfing the web I came across this interesting site recently.This particular page displays the now abandoned Johnston Atoll,part of a United States Territory in the mid Pacific abandoned by the Airforce.All the structures are still intact,housing,recreation,hospital,etc..Just laying there waiting to be occupied.Imagine the possibilities.A future home for a Roman colony?Just a thought.> http://www.urbangho stsmedia. com/2010/ 04/isolated- and-abandoned- military- airbase-johnston -atoll

Vale et valete,
Appius Galerius Aurelianus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75758 From: Vedius Date: 2010-05-05
Subject: Re: Interesting Link!
Salve Galeri!

Heavens forfend Nova Roma actually *act* upon its claims and
aspirations. That would make us look like kooks, dontchaknow...

Flavius Vedius Germanicus

galerius_of_rome wrote:
> Salve et salvete,
>
> While surfing the web I came across this interesting site recently.This particular page displays the now abandoned Johnston Atoll,part of a United States Territory in the mid Pacific abandoned by the Airforce.All the structures are still intact,housing,recreation,hospital,etc..Just laying there waiting to be occupied.Imagine the possibilities.A future home for a Roman colony?Just a thought.> http://www.urbangho stsmedia. com/2010/ 04/isolated- and-abandoned- military- airbase-johnston -atoll
>
> Vale et valete,
> Appius Galerius Aurelianus
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75759 From: mcorvvs Date: 2010-05-05
Subject: Re: Interesting Link!
Salvete omnes!

Just two quotes from the text^
"A 25 acre landfill on Johnston Island holds radioactive debris from the failed 1962 nuclear test, along with chemical residue from Vietnam and sarin nerve gas from the former Soviet Union."
"In 2003, jurisdiction of Johnston Atoll was finally turned over to the Fish and Wildlife Service. All structures and facilities on the base were destroyed, and runway was marked closed by a giant cross at each end."


--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "galerius_of_rome" <galerius_of_rome@...> wrote:
>
> Salve et salvete,
>
> While surfing the web I came across this interesting site recently.This particular page displays the now abandoned Johnston Atoll,part of a United States Territory in the mid Pacific abandoned by the Airforce.All the structures are still intact,housing,recreation,hospital,etc..Just laying there waiting to be occupied.Imagine the possibilities.A future home for a Roman colony?Just a thought.> http://www.urbangho stsmedia. com/2010/ 04/isolated- and-abandoned- military- airbase-johnston -atoll
>
> Vale et valete,
> Appius Galerius Aurelianus
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75760 From: Robert Levee Date: 2010-05-05
Subject: Re: Interesting Link!
Salve,
 
Sorry,I missed that in my excitement.I do apologize for that.Still quite an interesting site.
 
Vale bene,
Appius Galerius Aurelianus

--- On Wed, 5/5/10, mcorvvs <mcorvvs@...> wrote:


From: mcorvvs <mcorvvs@...>
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Interesting Link!
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Date: Wednesday, May 5, 2010, 10:07 PM


 



Salvete omnes!

Just two quotes from the text^
"A 25 acre landfill on Johnston Island holds radioactive debris from the failed 1962 nuclear test, along with chemical residue from Vietnam and sarin nerve gas from the former Soviet Union."
"In 2003, jurisdiction of Johnston Atoll was finally turned over to the Fish and Wildlife Service. All structures and facilities on the base were destroyed, and runway was marked closed by a giant cross at each end."

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogrou ps.com, "galerius_of_ rome" <galerius_of_ rome@...> wrote:
>
> Salve et salvete,
>
> While surfing the web I came across this interesting site recently.This particular page displays the now abandoned Johnston Atoll,part of a United States Territory in the mid Pacific abandoned by the Airforce.All the structures are still intact,housing, recreation, hospital, etc..Just laying there waiting to be occupied.Imagine the possibilities. A future home for a Roman colony?Just a thought.> http://www.urbangho stsmedia. com/2010/ 04/isolated- and-abandoned- military- airbase-johnston -atoll
>
> Vale et valete,
> Appius Galerius Aurelianus
>











[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75761 From: marcushoratius Date: 2010-05-06
Subject: Pridie Nonas Maias: The Roman seige of Sparta
M. Moravius Piscinus cultoribus Deorum et omnibus salutem plurimam dicit: Deis immortlibus nobis laetitiam det.

Hodie est die pristine Nonas Maias; haec dies comitialis est: Nepa medius occidit, tempestatem significat.

AUC 568 / 195 BCE: The Seige of Sparta

"Following the war with Philip of Macedonia the Greeks began to contest with one another, contrary to the peace imposed by Rome. The tyrant of Sparta, by the name of Nabis, had seized Argos and placed the tyrant Pythagoras over it. A Roman army under T. Quinctius Flaminius, along with his Greek and Rhodian allies, outmaneuvered the Spartans, driving them on their city. Quinctius invested Sparta and then assaulted the city.

"Quinctius saw that there was nothing left but to invest the place, and after despatching officers to bring up the whole of the naval contingent from Gytheum, he proceeded with his military tribunes to ride round the city and examine its position. Sparta had formerly been unwalled, but in recent years the various tyrants had protected those parts which were level and exposed by a wall; the higher and less accessible positions were defended by permanent military posts instead of fortifications. When the consul had made a thorough inspection of the place he saw that he would have to employ the whole of his force in the attack. Accordingly he completely invested the city with Roman and allied troops, mounted and unmounted; in fact, his entire military and naval strength, amounting to 50,000 men. Some were carrying scaling ladders, others fire, others the different things with which to attack and still more to appal the enemy. Orders were issued for all to raise the battle-shout and rush straight forward to the assault at the same moment so that the Lacedaemonians, threatened on every side, would not know where first to meet the attack or where assistance would be most required. Quinctius formed his main army into three divisions: the first was to deliver the assault in the neighbourhood of the Phoebeum; the second towards the Dictynneum; the third at the place called the Heptagoniae. All these points were unprotected by walls. Though the city was now encompassed on every side by so menacing a foe the tyrant was most energetic in its defence; wherever shouts arose on some sudden onset, when breathless messengers came asking for help, he either hurried to the threatened spot himself or sent others to assist. When, however, demoralisation and panic had set in everywhere, he completely lost his nerve, and was unable either to give the necessary orders or to listen to the messages that came; he not only lost all power of judgment, but was almost beside himself.

"As long as they were in the narrow streets the Lacedaemonians stood their ground against the Romans, and three separate actions were going on at different places, but as the struggle became more intense it became more unequal. The Lacedaemonians were carrying on the fight with missiles, against which the Romans were easily able to protect themselves by their large shields, and whilst some fell harmlessly others came with little force. Owing to the confined space and the crowding together they had no room to run before hurling their missiles to give them greater force, nor could they keep a firm and steady footing while they tried to throw them. None of the darts which the enemy flung penetrated the bodies and very few the shields of the Romans. Some wounds were caused by the enemy who were on higher ground around them, but soon their advance exposed them to an unlooked-for attack from the houses, not only darts but even tiles being hurled upon them. On this they held their shields above their heads and closed up so that with shield joined to shield there might be no room for a chance missile or even for one thrown at close range to penetrate. In this testudo formation they went on.

"For a short time the Romans were held up by the narrowness of the streets as they and the enemy were closely packed together, but when they got into a broader thoroughfare they pushed the enemy back and were able to advance, and the violence of their attack made further resistance impossible. When the Lacedaemonians had once turned to flight and were making for the higher parts of the city, Nabis, in a state of distraction as though the city was actually taken, was looking round for some way of escape, but Pythagoras, who in all other respects was showing the spirit and leadership of a general, was now the one man who saved the city from capture. He gave orders for the buildings nearest the walls to be set alight and they instantly burst into flames, the townsmen, who at other times would naturally have helped to extinguish them, fanning the conflagration. The roofs collapsed upon the Romans, broken tiles and pieces of burning wood struck the soldiers, the flames spread far and wide, and the smoke caused them alarm out of all proportion to the danger incurred. Those who were still outside the city making the final assault fell back from the walls; those who were already within, afraid of being cut off by the outbreak of fire in their rear, retired, and Quinctius, seeing the state of matters, sounded the retreat. Recalled from the assault when the city was all but captured, they returned to camp." ~ T. Livius 34.38-39

For the next three days the Romans demonstrated around the walls, engaging in small skirmishes until Nabis realized his situation and surrendered.


No Marriage Ceremonies are held in the Month of May

"Why do men not marry during the month of May? Is it because this month comes between April and June, of which they regard April as sacred to Venus and June as sacred to Juno, both of them divinities of marriage; and so they put the wedding a little earlier or wait until later? Or is it because in this month they hold their most important ceremony of purification, in which they now throw images from the bridge into the river, but in days of old they used to throw human beings? Wherefore it is the custom that the Flaminica, reputed to be consecrate to Juno, shall wear a stern face, and refrain from bathing and wearing ornaments at this time. Or is it because many of the Latins make offerings to the departed in this month? And it is for this reason, perhaps, that they worship Mercury in this month and that the month derives its name from Maia. Or is May, as some relate, named after the older (maior) and June after the younger generation (iunior)? For youth is better fitted for marriage, as Euripides also says:

Old age bids Love to take Her leave for aye
And Aphrodite wearies of the old.

They do not, therefore, marry in May, but wait for June which comes next after May." ~ Plutarch, Roman Questions 86


Our thought for today is from Epictetus, Enchiridion 45

"Does any one bathe hastily? Do not say that he does it ill, but hastily. Does any one drink much wine? Do not say that he does ill, but that he drinks a great deal. For unless you perfectly understand his motives, how should you know if he acts ill? Thus you will not risk yielding to any appearances but such as you fully comprehend."
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75762 From: marcushoratius Date: 2010-05-06
Subject: Re: a. d. III Nonas Maias: Hercules
Salva sis, Lucia Livia

I try to model my posts as an almanac and therefore include the weather information. There are two sources I primarily use - Columella and Plinius, N. H. 18. Varro's Res Rustica and Vergil's Georgic I are two other sources. The weather information is actually from observation of star risings and are part of the Roman sidereal calendar. Like the Julian calendar, the dates for observed star risings are really two weeks or more later than the Gregorian dates.

Roman weather lore was based mostly on the arrival of winds, and it is the winds that were actually associated with certain star risings.

Besides star risings, I sometimes include lunar lore, as Plinius mentioned it and some Roman books on agriculture use it, as it still appears in American almanacs. Quite simply, weather changes seem to occur with the change of a lunar phase. A combination of wind direction, lunar phase, and simple observations can give a reasonably accurate forecast. Those observations, though, are what would offer a local forecast. Stars, moon, and winds provide general weather patterns.

Vale optime, amica

Piscinus



--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "L. Livia Plauta" <livia.plauta@...> wrote:
>
> L. Livia M. Moravio sal.
>
> Piscine, where do you get the weather information you put into these posts?
> You don't always add it, but I noticed that whenever you do it proves to be
> completely accurate for Budapest. It's mind-boggling: it's actually more
> accurate than a weather forecast.
> Of course it rained today.
>
> Optime vale,
> Livia
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75763 From: Belle Morte Date: 2010-05-06
Subject: Change Of E-mail
Salvete,


Thanks to some weird inexplicable turn of events, my primary gmail account
has been deleted so I will be using my secondary address.... This is the
e-mail address where I can be reached and will be receiving posts, until
this pesky situation is resolved..

Thank you for your time, and I apologize for the inconvience..



Vale Optime,
Aeternia


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75764 From: Vedius Date: 2010-05-06
Subject: Temple of Cybele in Legal Trouble
Salvete,

I came across the following news item today:

http://wildhunt.org/blog/2010/05/update-on-the-maetreum-of-cybele-saga.html

Apparently, a 3-acre pagan sanctuary and temple of the Magna Mater
(website here: http://gallae.com/) located in upstate New York is facing
legal problems with the town. Despite having received a 501(c)3
designation from the Internal Revenue Service, the town refuses to grant
them a tax exemption (apparently in contravention of New York state
law), and they are slated to have their property confiscated at the end
of this year. More details on both their website and the Wild Hunt link
I posted above, but I think this is absolutely shameful, and it is
something that we can, and should, get behind.

Perhaps Nova Roma could make a donation to their legal defense fund?
Seems like a worthy use of the taxes we are called upon to pay.

Vale,

Flavius Vedius Germanicus
Pater Patriae
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75765 From: C.Maria Caeca Date: 2010-05-06
Subject: Re: Temple of Cybele in Legal Trouble
Salvete Omnes,

As much as I may sympathize with their organization, frankly, there are things NR needs to accomplish our own goals, stabilize our infrastructure, and provide services to our own citizens and Provinces. I don't think we are in a position to be contributing to anyone else's cause, at least at this point, especially since we know so little about this organization. However, having said that, I also think that such problems need our moral support, if nothing else, because the time may well come when their problems will become *our* problems, and we may need the help and support of the Polytheist community. Therefore, I encourage all citizens to research this, starting with the links already provided, and if you feel this situation deserves and needs your help, in whatever form you choose, that you supply that help. Perhaps the appropriate officials in NR might want to take a close look, also, to determine if we, as a group, would find it appropriate to express our support and solidarity with them.

Valete Bene,
C. Maria Caeca

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75766 From: rory12001 Date: 2010-05-06
Subject: Re: Temple of Cybele in Legal Trouble
Salve Caeca;
I agree with you and just I checked their website and calendar, they are pagans, goddess worshippers, but don't seem to be Roman reconstructionists at all.

They are being discriminated against, why don't they contact the ACLU instead of spending money? Though at this point I don't see why all religious orgs shouldn't pay property tax.
optime vale
Maior

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "C.Maria Caeca" <c.mariacaeca@...> wrote:
>
> Salvete Omnes,
>
> As much as I may sympathize with their organization, frankly, there are things NR needs to accomplish our own goals, stabilize our infrastructure, and provide services to our own citizens and Provinces. I don't think we are in a position to be contributing to anyone else's cause, at least at this point, especially since we know so little about this organization. However, having said that, I also think that such problems need our moral support, if nothing else, because the time may well come when their problems will become *our* problems, and we may need the help and support of the Polytheist community. Therefore, I encourage all citizens to research this, starting with the links already provided, and if you feel this situation deserves and needs your help, in whatever form you choose, that you supply that help. Perhaps the appropriate officials in NR might want to take a close look, also, to determine if we, as a group, would find it appropriate to express our support and solidarity with them.
>
> Valete Bene,
> C. Maria Caeca
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75767 From: C.Maria Caeca Date: 2010-05-07
Subject: Re: Temple of Cybele in Legal Trouble
C. Maria Caeca M. Hortensiae Maori s. P. D.

Please understand that I am not unsympathetic to their situation, whatever their form of Polytheism may be. It is not mine, and, while they are not, apparently Roman recons, I find it very disturbing when any serious religious group is the victim of bigotry and/or unfairness. However ...thee are some excellent Pagan organizations that can help them *very* effectively, and I think that, while it might make a nice PR statement to send them a donation, I also think that, until we have the luxury of having enough resources to make gratuitous PR statements of that sort, we should use our resources to put our own "house" in order. Doing so will, eventually, be of more help to the Pagan community, as a whole, than a necessarily small, one time donation to a specific group for a specific purpose.

As to the other point you raise ...I plead lack of qualifications to comment, although ...if that did happen, and not *all* religious groups were included in the requirement, I would *certainly* have a great deal to say ...loudly, emphatically, and as publicly as I could manage (smile).

Vale et valete bene,
C. Maria Caeca

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75768 From: galerius_of_rome Date: 2010-05-07
Subject: Resignation!
Salve et salvete,spd

I,Appius Galerius Aurelianus,hereby officially resign all political positions,that I now retain within Nova Roma.It has been an honor to have served you and I thank all who have supported me in the past.I do this mainly for personal reasons,due to my wife's continuing battle with bone marrow cancer.I will however,continue to retain my citizenship in Nova Roma and to continue my religious pursuits.

Vale et valete,
Appius Galerius Aurelianus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75769 From: marcushoratius Date: 2010-05-07
Subject: NONAE MAIAE: Mola Salsa; Battle of Metaurus
M. Moravius Piscinus cultoribus Deorum, Quiritibus et omnibus salutem plurimam dicit: Diis bene iuvantibus sitis

Hodie est Nonae Maesiae; haec dies fastus est: Vergiliae exoriuntur mane, Favonius

Vestal Virgins Prepare Mola Salsa

"No sacrifices shall be performed without meal." ~ Numa Pompilius

On the alternating days from the Nones of May until the day before the Ides (that is, 7, 9, and 11 May), the three senior-most Vestales Virgines prepare the mola salsa that is used at the Vestalia of June, on the Ides of September for the commemoration of the dedication of the Capitolium, and again at the Lupercalia of February (Servius, Commentary on Virgil's Eclogue 8.82). The Vestales would pick the first ripening heads of grain with their own virgin fingers. The grain was then soaked in a brine. The salt for this brine was taken from far out at sea in the fall. To the salt-water was added fresh water, both sealed in clay jars and baked in an oven. The result was blocks of salt that the Vestales cut by using an iron saw (Veranius Flaccus GRF 6; Paulus, Festus p. 159, 10: muries). After the grain soaked in the sea-salt brine, it was roasted in an oven. The Vestales next ground the roasted grain with a mortar and pestle rather than use a mill. To this "salted" grain flour was then added just enough water to make a sticky dough to form the mola salsa cakes. Crumbled, the mola salsa was used to sanctify offerings before sacrifice, and was often an offering in itself. A sacrifice is not properly sanctified and dedicated without first sprinkling mola salsa on it.

"At first, they say, Numa consecrated Gegania and Verania, followed by Canuleia and Tarpeia. Later Servius added two more, making the number six that has been maintained up to our time." ~ Plutarch Numa 10.1


AUC 546 / 207 BCE: Battle on the Metaurus River

One of the most decisive battles in history, the Roman victory on the Metaurus River is overshadowed by such disasters as Cannae and Lake Transimene, or by Rome's eventual, culminating victory at Zama. But the turning point of war with Hannibal came on the Metaurus, where Hannibal's brother, Hasdrubal, was defeated and his entire army annihilated. It left Hannibal stranded in Italy, cut off from his base in Hispania and from Carthage. The Battle on the Metaurus River is a classic example of the use of interior lines to concentrate one's forces against one enemy force while screening off another enemy force. In that, the Battle of the Metaurus is comparable to battles like Tanneburg or Second Manassas, only with a more devastating effect on the outcome of the respective wars.

Hasdrubal had crossed into Italy in two months, where Hannibal had taken six months. His force was somewhat larger than his brother had raised along the way, being around 48,000 infantry, 8,000 cavalry, and 15 elephants (Appian, Hist.: War Against Hannibal 52). By the time of the battle his force is thought to have been reduced to around 30,000 with ten elephants. Facing him were two legions under Marcus Livius with roughly the same strength. The Roman army was fighting a delaying action in an attempt to prevent Hasdrubal from joining forces with Hannibal, but slowly the Carthaginians had advanced into Umbria. Hasdrubal sent messages to his brother where Hannibal was in Bruttium trying to maneuver against the much larger force of C. Claudius Nero. After a couple of engagements, in which the Romans got the better of the Catharginians, Hannibal was retreating towards Metapontum. Nero kept on Hannibal's heels, slowly wearing the Punic force down, but also keeping his distance to prevent a full engagement. A Roman foraging party intercepted Hasdrubal's couriers and delivered them to the Consul. Nero made rapid decisions. He wrote to the Senate, instructing then to bring the legion from Capua and additional forces to be raised at Rome into a blocking position at Narnia. This was to prevent Hasdrubal from crossing to the western side of the Apennines. Then leaving a force under Q. Catius to screen Hannibal, Nero marched with 6,000 infantry and 1,000 cavalry to join Livius at Sena (Livius 27.44) A third force under Praetor L. Porcius Licinius reinforced the consular armies. The arrival of these additional forces were undetected by the Carthaginians.

During the night before the battle Hasdrubal attempted to slip away. Leaving his fortified position, his army became lost and confused in the marshy areas along the Metaurus River as they vainly sought fords across. Meanwhile the Gauls who accompanied hasdrubal's army spent the night drinking. By dawn Roman cavalry came upon Hasdrubal's army, with the legions closing in behind them. Unable to cross the Metaurus, Hasdrubal drew up his army into a line that had a narrow front and was deeper than usual. This formation was dictated by the marshy terrain. On his right he placed his best troops, the Iberians and a few Africans. At the center he led the Ligurians. On his left, their front covered by a steep ravine, were the drunken and disorderly Gauls. To the front he placed his elephants.

Marcus Livius initiated the battle by charging the Iberians. Porcius Licinius followed with a charge on the Ligurians at Hasdrubal's center. Claudius Nero, on the Roman right, was unable to reach the Gauls. He therefore took part of his force and marched them behind the Roman line to fall on the rear of Hasdrubal's right. The elephants, caught between the two armies disordered the front ranks of the Romans. But when Nero was able to come onto their flank and rear, the elephants panicked and ran through the Carthaginian lines. Six elephants were killed in battle, most by their own drivers, while the Romans captured two after the battle (Livius 27.48; Polybius 11.2.1). Around 10,000 Carthaginians fell in battle, among them Hasdrubal (Livius gives 54,000 dead and 5,400 taken prisoner). All but a few prominent Africans were executed after the battle. The Gauls were slaughtered. The rest of the army, Iberians and Ligurians, were sold as slaves. The Romans lost around 2,000 men (Livius gives 8,000 Romans and allies), while they regained nearly the same number who had been captured before the battle Polybius 11.2.3; Livius 27.49). Nero then marched back to his camp at Venusium, taking six days. Upon arrival he had his African prisoners displayed before Hannibal's outposts and had Hasdrubal head tossed towards the Carthaginian camp. Upon receiving the news of the defeat and of his brother's death, Hannibal abandoned Metapontum and retreated into Bruttium. (Livius 27.51)


Rosalia

This evening sees the lighting of candles and offering of roses at the tombs of the ancestors.

Plutarch, Roman Questions 75:

"Why did they (the Romans) not extinguish a lamp, but suffered it to go out on its own? Did they reverence it as akin and closely related to the inextinguishable and underlying fire, or it this also a symbolic indication that we should not destroy nor do away with any living thing, if it does us no harm, since fire is like a living thing? For it needs sustenance, it moves of itself, and when it is extinguished it gives out a sound as if it were being slain. Or does the custom teach us that we should not destroy fire, water, or any other necessity when we have enough and to spare, but should allow those who have need of these things to be used by them, and should leave them for others when we ourselves no longer have any need over them?"


AUC 354 / 399 BCE: Death of Socrates


AUC 918 / 165 CE: Birth of diva Iulia Maesa Augusta avia Augusti

Julia Maesa was the sister-in-law of Septimius Severus, sister to Julia Domna, aunt to Caracalla and Geta, and grandmother to Elagabalus and Alexander Severus. She raised a revolt of the Syrian legions against Macrinus, the usurper who had murdered Caracalla, and first placed Elagabalus on the throne. But when her grandson proved such a disaster as emperor and thus threatened her own position, she had him assassinated and placed her other grandson, Alexander Severus, on the throne.


Our thought for today is from Epictetus, Fragment 2:

"He who is discontented with what he has and what has been granted to him by fortune is a layman in the art of life. But he who bears it nobly, and acts rationally with regard to all that arises from it, deserves to be acknowledged as a good man."
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75770 From: marcushoratius Date: 2010-05-07
Subject: Sacrum Iunonis Covellae
M. Moravius Piscinus Pontifex Maximus: Quiritibus, cultoribus Deorum ex patriae et omnibus: salutem plurimam dicit:

HOC AGETE !

A sacrificial ritual for Juno Covella is performed this day, the Nonae Maiae:

Hail, Juno Covella, eternal Goddess, You who dwells in ancient temples, shining gloriously upon the Arx, most chaste Mother, whose sanctity is pleasing to the hearts of the Gods, You are the brilliant lily whom Jupiter cherished before all others. You are the Great Goddess, Queen of the Gods. You, Goddess, we adore. We invoke Your presence among us. Come. Make what we ask to be readily and easily accomplished, and draw our thanks, Goddess Juno, that, in fidelity, You do rightly merit. Juno, as it is prescribed for you in those books – and for this reason may every good fortune attend the Roman people, the Quirites – let sacrifice be made to you. I beg and pray that in making this offering to you, I pray with good prayers, that You look favorably on us and our household and our homes; may this offering strengthen and honor You.

To you, Juno Covella, I offer blue irises and incense of orris root.

Juno Covella, in offering to You this incense I pray good prayers that You will look kindly and favorably upon our children and upon us, on our homes and on our households.

Come, most chaste Queen of Heaven, in offering You this libum and strues bread I pray good prayers in order that, pleased with this offering of libum bread, You may be favorable toward us and to our children, to our houses and our households. May You be honored in this.


The festivals to be celebrated in the month of Maius, tutela Apollonis, shall be:

MAIUS

1 F KAL FLORALIA Laribus Praeneste, Angitiae,
2 F dies ater FLORALIA
3 C FLORALIA
4 C
5 C
6 C
7 F NONAE Maesiae
8 F dies ater Mens
9 N religiosus LEMURIA
10 C dies Rosaria
11 N religiosus LEMURIA
12 C Ludi Marti, Marti Ultori, Marti Moles
13 N religiosus LEMURIA, Rosaria
14 C MARTI INVICTO
15 NP EIDUS religiosus FERIAE IOVI, MERCURALIA, MAIA
16 F dies ater
17 C
18 C
19 C
20 C
21 NP Agonalia Vediovi
22 N
23 NP Tubilustrum dies Rosarum
24 QRCF
25 C FORS FORTUNA, Fortunae Publica
26 C
27 C
28 C
29 C
30 C Ludi Tarentini
31 C Ludi Saeculares, dies Rosmaria


I pour a libation of honeyed milk for You, Juno Covello.

Juno Covella, may You be strengthened by this libation, may You be honored by this portion of milk.

Then in silence I sit to await signs that my offerings on behalf of the Cives of Nova Roma have been accepted. When these are seen I rise and turn about.

Thus is it done; may the immortal Gods make it so, as fortunate as it is pious.

No more, Gods on High, do I ask of You today; it is enough.



____________

Hoc Agete!

Sacrum Iunonis Covellae

Ave Iuno Covella, Dea aeterna, tenes vetusta delubra, gloriosa in Arce, castissima Mater, cuius sanctitas cordi Diis est, tu candidum lilium quod Juppiter ante omnes coluit. Tu es Magna tuque deorum regina es, dea. Te, Dea, adoramus tuumque nos numen invocamus, facilisque praestes hoc nos quod te rogamus; referemusque grates, Dea Iuno, tibi merita fide. Iuno, uti tibi in illis libris scriptum est quarumque rerum ergo quodque melius sit populo Romano Quiritibus tibi sacrum fiat te quaeso precorque te his donis obmovendis bonas preces precor uti sis volens propitia nobis, domo familaeque nostrae. Macte his donis.

Iuno Covella, te hoc ture ommovendo bonas preces praecor ut sis volens propitius nobis liberisque notris domis familisque nostris.

Huc ades, castissima Regina, te hoc libo strueque obmovendo bonas preces precor ut sis volens propitius nobis liberisque notris domis familisque nostris. mactus hoc ferto.

Iuno Covella macte ista libatione pollicenda sint, macte lacti inferio sint.

Illicet. Di immortales faciant, tam felix quam pia.

Nil amplius vos hodie posco, superi, satis est.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75771 From: Kirsteen Wright Date: 2010-05-07
Subject: Re: Resignation!
I am very sorry to hear of your wife's troubles. You are both in my thoughts
and prayers

Flavia Lucilla Merula

On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 6:23 AM, galerius_of_rome <galerius_of_rome@...
> wrote:

> Salve et salvete,spd
>
> I,Appius Galerius Aurelianus,hereby officially resign all political
> positions,that I now retain within Nova Roma.It has been an honor to have
> served you and I thank all who have supported me in the past.I do this
> mainly for personal reasons,due to my wife's continuing battle with bone
> marrow cancer.I will however,continue to retain my citizenship in Nova Roma
> and to continue my religious pursuits.
>
> Vale et valete,
> Appius Galerius Aurelianus
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75772 From: marcus.lucretius Date: 2010-05-07
Subject: New edition of Claridge's archaeological guide to Rome will be out s
Agricola Omnibus SPD

A new edition of Professor Claridge's archaeological guide to Rome is due out soon. The first edition is wonderful, and this new edition is said to be much updated. We have this new edition listed already in our Amazon shops.

In the USA: http://astore.amazon.com/novrom-20/detail/0199546835/

In Canada: http://astore.amazon.ca/novrom08-20/detail/0199546835

In the UK: http://astore.amazon.co.uk/novrom-21/detail/0199546835

If you purchase from one of these shops, a portion of the price goes to the Nova Roma treasury.

In my opinion, this book is a must-have for any visit to Rome.

valete!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75773 From: L. Livia Plauta Date: 2010-05-07
Subject: Re: Resignation!
Salve Appi Galeri,
I'm sorry for your situation. I wish your wife a full recovery.

Optime vale,
Livia

----- Original Message -----
From: "galerius_of_rome" <galerius_of_rome@...>
To: <Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Friday, May 07, 2010 7:23 AM
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Resignation!


Salve et salvete,spd

I,Appius Galerius Aurelianus,hereby officially resign all political
positions,that I now retain within Nova Roma.It has been an honor to have
served you and I thank all who have supported me in the past.I do this
mainly for personal reasons,due to my wife's continuing battle with bone
marrow cancer.I will however,continue to retain my citizenship in Nova Roma
and to continue my religious pursuits.

Vale et valete,
Appius Galerius Aurelianus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75774 From: L. Livia Plauta Date: 2010-05-07
Subject: Re: Temple of Cybele in Legal Trouble
Salvete omnes,
regardless of whether this Magna Mater temple is reconstructionist or not, I
think it's a worthy object of our solidarity. What goes round, comes round.
There is no knowing if we might face a similar situation in the future, and
whether one agrees or not to religious organizations being exempt from
estate taxes, it is important to uphold the principle that all religions
should get equal treatment.

If they are unable to obtain free legal assistance, even a symbolic donation
from our budget could be a significant gesture.
But what we can do to no cost is joining in any existing petition or
creating one, writing letters to parliament representatives, local
authorities, or whoever it is that people write to in these situations in
the US. If the authorities that are creating trouble for the Magna Mater
temple start receiving letters from all over the world, they might well
re-evaluate the situation.
Maybe some US citizen could provide a form letter we could send?

Optime valete,
Livia


> Salvete,
>
> I came across the following news item today:
>
> http://wildhunt.org/blog/2010/05/update-on-the-maetreum-of-cybele-saga.html
>
> Apparently, a 3-acre pagan sanctuary and temple of the Magna Mater
> (website here: http://gallae.com/) located in upstate New York is facing
> legal problems with the town. Despite having received a 501(c)3
> designation from the Internal Revenue Service, the town refuses to grant
> them a tax exemption (apparently in contravention of New York state
> law), and they are slated to have their property confiscated at the end
> of this year. More details on both their website and the Wild Hunt link
> I posted above, but I think this is absolutely shameful, and it is
> something that we can, and should, get behind.
>
> Perhaps Nova Roma could make a donation to their legal defense fund?
> Seems like a worthy use of the taxes we are called upon to pay.
>
> Vale,
>
> Flavius Vedius Germanicus
> Pater Patriae
>
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75775 From: C.Maria Caeca Date: 2010-05-07
Subject: Re: Resignation!
Salve Appius Galerius,

I add my sorrow to learn of your wife's illness, and wish your entire family, but especially you wife, the very best! I will keep your family close in my thoughts and prayers, and it goes without saying that, if I can ever be of help to you in any way, you need only ask, and if it is in my power, it is done.

Vale quam optime,
C. Maria Caeca

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75776 From: Robert Levee Date: 2010-05-07
Subject: Re: Temple of Cybele in Legal Trouble
Ap.Galerio Aureliano C. Maria Caeca spd,
 
I must say, I agree with your statements 100%.We as Nova Romans need to look to the various religious projects, that are ongoing here within our nation.Contributions to the Religio Romana are always welcome.Also the Temple Pro DllS, to build a temple to the Gods in Rome, is a very important project.As it stands we are considering Sarmatia as the temporary home for the temple and as a temporary home for the Godesses and Gods of Rome, as the lack of funds and support for this, is not sufficient to make that dream come true at this time.We Romans who support the Religeo, really need to get behind these groups in our own community.After all charity begins at home.I do feel we should lend this group our full moral and spiritual support, by prayer,petitioning and bringing pressure to bear upon the town of Catskill in any way we can.
 
For The Gods!
Appius Galerius Aurelianus--- On Fri, 5/7/10, C.Maria Caeca <c.mariacaeca@...> wrote:


From: C.Maria Caeca <c.mariacaeca@...>
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: Temple of Cybele in Legal Trouble
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Date: Friday, May 7, 2010, 12:14 AM


 



C. Maria Caeca M. Hortensiae Maori s. P. D.

Please understand that I am not unsympathetic to their situation, whatever their form of Polytheism may be. It is not mine, and, while they are not, apparently Roman recons, I find it very disturbing when any serious religious group is the victim of bigotry and/or unfairness. However ...thee are some excellent Pagan organizations that can help them *very* effectively, and I think that, while it might make a nice PR statement to send them a donation, I also think that, until we have the luxury of having enough resources to make gratuitous PR statements of that sort, we should use our resources to put our own "house" in order. Doing so will, eventually, be of more help to the Pagan community, as a whole, than a necessarily small, one time donation to a specific group for a specific purpose.

As to the other point you raise ...I plead lack of qualifications to comment, although ...if that did happen, and not *all* religious groups were included in the requirement, I would *certainly* have a great deal to say ...loudly, emphatically, and as publicly as I could manage (smile).

Vale et valete bene,
C. Maria Caeca

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]











[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75777 From: Christer Edling Date: 2010-05-07
Subject: Re: Resignation!
Salve Appius Galerius Aurelianus, Amice!

I am very sorry to see You resign, but I do understand your situation.
It makes me very sad to hear about your situation and I will pray for
your wife, your family and You.

*************
7 maj 2010 kl. 07.23 skrev galerius_of_rome:

Salve et salvete,spd

I,Appius Galerius Aurelianus,hereby officially resign all political
positions,that I now retain within Nova Roma.It has been an honor to
have served you and I thank all who have supported me in the past.I do
this mainly for personal reasons,due to my wife's continuing battle
with bone marrow cancer.I will however,continue to retain my
citizenship in Nova Roma and to continue my religious pursuits.

Vale et valete,
Appius Galerius Aurelianus


*****************
Vale

Caeso Fabius Buteo Quintilianus

Consul Iterum
Princeps Senatus et Flamen Palatualis
Civis Romanus sum
http://www.novaroma.org/nr/Main_Page
************************************************
Aut inveniam viam aut faciam
"I'll either find a way or make one"
************************************************
Dignitas, Iustitia, Fidelitas et Pietas
Dignity, Justice, Loyalty and Dutifulness
************************************************
Mons Palatinus, Clivus Victoriae
Palatine Hill, Incline of Victoriae
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75778 From: rory12001 Date: 2010-05-07
Subject: Re: Resignation!
Salve Appi Galeri;
may Aesculapius and Apollo Medicus return your wife to full health.
di tibi favent
Maior


>
> Salve Appi Galeri,
> I'm sorry for your situation. I wish your wife a full recovery.
>
> Optime vale,
> Livia
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "galerius_of_rome" <galerius_of_rome@>
> To: <Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com>
> Sent: Friday, May 07, 2010 7:23 AM
> Subject: [Nova-Roma] Resignation!
>
>
> Salve et salvete,spd
>
> I,Appius Galerius Aurelianus,hereby officially resign all political
> positions,that I now retain within Nova Roma.It has been an honor to have
> served you and I thank all who have supported me in the past.I do this
> mainly for personal reasons,due to my wife's continuing battle with bone
> marrow cancer.I will however,continue to retain my citizenship in Nova Roma
> and to continue my religious pursuits.
>
> Vale et valete,
> Appius Galerius Aurelianus
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75779 From: galerius_of_rome Date: 2010-05-07
Subject: My Sincere Appreciation!
Salve et salvete,

Thank you one and all for your blessings and prayers for my wife.May the Godesses and Gods of Rome bless each one of you.Thank you from the bottom of my heart.

Vale et valete,
Appius Galerius Aurelianus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75780 From: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com Date: 2010-05-08
Subject: Reminder Ludi Apollinares, 5/8/2010, 12:00 pm
Reminder from:   Nova-Roma Yahoo! Group
 
Title:   Reminder Ludi Apollinares
 
Date:   Saturday May 8, 2010
Time:   12:00 pm - 1:00 pm
Repeats:   This event repeats every week until Friday July 9, 2010.
Location:   Ludi Apollinares
Notes:   Don't forget to be inspired and start your project for the Ludi honoring Apollo!

http://www.novaroma.org/nr/MMDCCLXIII/Ludi_Apollinares
 
Copyright © 2010  Yahoo! Inc. All Rights Reserved | Terms of Service | Privacy Policy
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75781 From: marcushoratius Date: 2010-05-08
Subject: a. d. VIII Eidus Maiae: Mens; Tullus Hostilius and the Fetiales
M. Moravius Piscinus cultores Deorum, Quiritibus et omnibus salutem plurimam dicit: Bene omnibus nobis

Hodie est ante diem VIII Eidus Maesiae; haec dies fastus aterque est: Mensi.

AUC 538 / 215 BCE: Dedication of a Temple to Mens

"Meanwhile the two commissioners were appointed for the dedication of temples: T. Otacilius Crassus dedicated the temple to Mens, Q. Fabius Maximus the one to Venus Erycina. Both are on the Capitol, separated only by a water channel." ~ Titus Livius 23.31

"Let them worship as deities those who have always been recognized as heavenly beings; and those who have won a place in heaven through their merits: Hercules, Liber, Aesculapius, Castor, Pollux, Quirinus; and those qualities through which men may gain access to heaven – Mens, Virtus, Pietas, Fides, of these virtues let there be shrines, but none of any of the vices." ~ M. Tullius Cicero, De Legibus 2.19

"Sometimes a deity is named after a particular quality that contains some force, like Fides and Mens. We can see shrines on the Capitol recently dedicated to this pair by Marcus Aemilius while Fides had beenconsecrated before that by Aulus Atilius Calatinus. You can see the temple of Virtus as well, and the temple of Honos restored by Marcus Marcellus, but dedicated many years before in the Ligurian War by Quintus Maximus. And what of Ops, what of Salus, what of Concordia, Libertas, Victoria? In the case of all these, because they have such force that they could not possibly be controlled except by a God, the quality itself has been designated divine. In the same category the name Cupido and Voluptas and Venus Lubitina have been consecrated. They may be corrupting and unnatural qualities, although Vellius thinks otherwise, yet those very vices often have a stronger impact on our character. Accordingly, those deities who gave rise to various benefits owed their deification to the size of the benefits they bestowed; and indeed those names that I just mentioned make clear the power that resides in each God." ~ M. Tullius Cicero, De Natura Deorum 2.60-62


Tullus Hostilius and the Fetiales

"He instituted the procedure by which war is declared, or to be more precise, he formulated the procedure himself in very fair terms, and then, by incorporating it in the ceremonies of the fetials, he enacted that every war which had not been declared and proclaimed should be deem unjust and unholy." ~ M. Tullius Cicero, de Republica, 2.17.31

The institution and rites of the fetiales were attributed to Numa Pompilius by some, or to his grandson Ancus Marcus. However, stories about Tullus Hostilius, whose reign was between these other kings, have him using the fetiales in his war with Alba Longa. He even uses them as a trick to justify his war. Our knowledge of the rites of the fetiales come mainly from Livy, and the reason for that is that by his time Romans were unfamiliar with the fetiales. This sodalitas seems to have been reintroduced as part of the Augustan Restoration.

"The earliest recorded treaty is this one between the Romans and Albans, to provide for a firm peace among one another's people. As not all treaties conclude the same provisions or forms, however, I will describe the forms by which this treaty was made, as tradition has handed down to us. The Fetialis put the formal question to Tullus: `Do you, King, order me to make a treaty with the Pater Patratus of the Alban people?' Upon the king replying in the affirmative, the Fetialis said: `I demand of you, King, tufts of sacred herbs (as a sign that my person shall be inviolable).' The king replied: `Take those that are pure.' The Fetialis brought pure herbs and grasses from the Arx. Afterwards he asked the king: `Do you, King, name me the nuntio to act as herald of the People of Rome, the Quirites, sanctioning also my vessels and comrades?' To which the king replied: `In so far as it may be without harm to myself and to the People of Rome, the Quirites, I do.' The Fetialis was M. Valerius. He made Spurius Furius the Pater Patratus by touching his head and hair with the sacred herb vervain. Then the Pater Patratus, who is appointed for the purpose of making a treaty and giving it religious sanction through an oath, did so by reciting a holy song whose long formula was given in verse, which is not worth while here to repeat. After reciting the conditions he said: `Hear, 0 Jupiter; hear me, too, Pater Patratus of the people of Alba! Hear me also, people of Alba! As these provisions have been publicly read in good faith from beginning to end from these tablets, and inasmuch as they have today been most clearly understood, so the People of Rome will not be the first to withdraw from these treaty provisions. If, in their public council, they were to do so, with false and malicious intent break this treaty, then, Dispater, on that day, may You bring ruin on the People of Rome, even as today I shall strike this swine, and strike them so much more the greater, as Your power and might is greater.' With these words he struck the swine with a flint knife. In similar words the Albans recited a holy song as their oath through their own dictator and their priests." ~ Livy 1.24.3-9:

The pater patratus was thus the fetialis chosen as the spokesman for the king to another court, just as in a court of law the defendant's spokesman was called a pater. The fetialis who gathered grass from atop the Arx, or citadel on the Capitoline Hill, was the verbenarius. This was also the location of the Auguraculum, or established station from which the auspices were taken for the State. The duties of the verbenarius may have included taking auspices to see if the Gods approved of the selection of the pater patratus. At any rate, that is what the pure tufts of grass would seem to indicate.

Recording the treaties that the Romans made with the Carthaginians, Polybius said that the Romans called upon a Jupiter Lithos, using a Greek word for "stone." Jupiter was called here as a witness along with Mars and Quirinus. This may refer to the fact that the slaughter of a pig to seal the treaty was made using a flint knife, and the phrase of "striking a treaty" (foedus ferire) comes from a sacrifice that was likely made to the Manes of both cities, called as witnesses and as the guarantors of the treaty. But Polybius related this Jupiter Lithos to another aspect of the rite. A fetialis would pick up a pebble to declare his personal good faith in making the treaty by saying:

"If I keep my promise, may heaven be kind to me, but if I think or act otherwise, while all other men shall be safeguarded in their own country, with their own laws, their possessions, their culti deorum and their tombs, may I be cast out and fall like this stone." ~ Polybius 3.25.6-9

Since a treaty was made by solemn oaths, witnessed before the Gods, any violation of its provisions would be a violation of sacred law. A procedure was then conducted to seek reparations, and if not given, then war was declared.

"When the legate arrives at the frontier of those from whom restitution is demanded, he covers his head with a fillet (of wool) and says, 'Hear thou, O Jupiter, hear ye, boundaries of - naming whatever nation they belong to - let divine law hear! I am the official herald of the Roman people; I come lawfully and piously commissioned, let there be trust in my words.' Then he sets forth his demands, after which he takes Jupiter to witness, "If I unjustly and impiously demand that these men and these goods be surrendered to me, then never let me be a full citizen of my fatherland." He cites these words when he crosses the boundary line, again to the first person he encounters, again when proceeding through the town gate, and again when he enters the market place, with only slight modification to the form and wording of the oath. If his demands are not met, at the end of 33 days - for such is the customary number - he declares war as follows, 'Hear thou, O Jupiter, and thou, Janus Quirinus, and all ye heavenly Gods, and ye terrestrial gods, and ye infernal gods, hear! I call you to witness that this people - naming whatever people it is - is unjust and does not render just reparation. But regarding these matters we will consult the elders in our fatherland, how we may acquire our due.' Then the legate returns to Rome for a consultation. Without delay the king would consult the senators with words approximating these, 'Having regard to those goods, disputes and causes of which the pater patratus of the Roman people gave due notice to the pater patratus of the Ancient Latins, and to the men of the Ancient Latins, the Prisci Latini, having regard to those things which they have neither rendered, nor fulfilled, nor discharged, speak.' Turning then to the man he would first ask of his opinion, to say, 'What do you think?' Then he would reply, 'I hold that these things ought to be sought by a war of justice and sacred duty. So I agree and with my vote approve.' The others were then, in order of rank, asked the question; and when the majority of those present voted for the same opinion, war had been agreed upon. The usual procedure was for the fetialis to carry to the border of the other nation a spear of iron or else of fire hardened cornel wood, and in the presence of not fewer than three adult males, to say, 'Forasmuch as the tribes of the Prisci Latini and men of the Prisci Latini have committed act and offence against the Roman people, and forasmuch as the Roman people have ordained that war be declared on the Prisci Latini, and the Senate of the Roman people has affirmed, agreed, and with their votes approved that there be war with the Prisci Latini, I, therefore, and the Roman people, declare and make war on the tribes of the Prisci Latini and the men of the Prisci Latini.' Having said this, he would hurl his spear across the border. This is the manner in which at that time redress was demanded of the Latins and war was declared, and it has been accepted by subsequent generations." ~ Titus Livius 1.32.6-14

In one particular incident, an Aquian general refused to listen to the Roman fetialis, instead telling him to give his message from the Roman Senate "to the oak." This the fetialis did.

"Let both this oak and whatever gods there are here, may they hear that the treaty has been broken by you, and let them attend now to our complaint and presently support our arms, when we shall avenge the simultaneous violation of the rights of gods and men." ~ Titus Livius 3.25.8:

In a later period, when Rome had expanded and its enemies were no longer among the Italic tribes, the rite of the fetiales was changed somewhat.

"When thirty-three days had elapsed after they had demanded redress, the fetiales used to hurl a spear against an enemy. But later, in the time of Pyrrhus (270 BCE), the Romans were going to wage war against an overseas enemy and could not find any place for the fetiales to perform this ritual of declaring war. So they arranged for one of Pyrrhus' soldiers to be captured, and they made him purchase some land in the area of the Circus Flaminius in order to fulfill the proper procedures for declaring war on, as it were, enemy land. Later a column was consecrated on that land, in front of the temple of Bellona." ~ Servius Honorius, Ad Aeneis 9.52

The rite of declaring war had the fetialis throwing a spear onto the enemy's land. The spear took hold of the land in a manner similar to Romulus hurling a spear from the Aventine onto the Palatine, where it took root (Plutarch Romulus 20.6-8). An iron spear was sometimes used, understandably as this related to Mars and the hasta Martis that was kept at the king's residence in the Regia. Other Latin cities had their own hastae Martis as well. The cornel, or red dogwood, was one of the felices arbores attributed with magical powers (Macr. Sat. 3.20.2), its reddish tinge in the white wood perhaps indicating the bloodshed that was about to begin, or, as Robert Turcan poses, that it made the "horrors of war rebound on the enemy." In the devotio rite where one offers himself in sacrifice by first standing on a spear, there may be a relation to the cornel spear of the fetiales, since the same Gods are called upon in both ceremonies - Jupiter, Mars, (Janus) Quirinus, Bellona, and the Lares of the city.

In the same way that a fetialis was chosen and a rite performed to declare war, there was also a formula used by which to surrender to the Roman fetiales. In the example given by Livy the Sabines of Collatia surrendered to Tarquinius Priscus.

The king asked of him, 'Are you the delegate and spokesman sent from the people of Conlatino, in order that you will surrender Conlatino and its people?' 'Yes, we are.' 'Are the people of Conlatino under your authority?' 'It is so.' 'Do you then surrender Conlatino, and its people, its city, lands, waters, its boundaries, temples, utensils, all that is divinely or humanly held, over to the authority of myself, and the Roman people?' 'We do.' 'Thereupon, I accept your surrender.'" ~ Titus Livius 1.38.2

From about the time of the Second Punic War there was little mention of the fetiales and they may have fallen out of use. Augustus restored the collegium of fetiales, and we hear of the rite of throwing the warspear onto enemy territory in the time of Marcus Aurelius. They continued in use until the middle of the fourth century of our era.


Today's thought is from Marcus Aurelius, Meditations 2.11.1:

"Since it is possible that thou mayest depart from life at any moment, regulate every act and thought accordingly. If there are Gods, departure from the world of men is nothing to fear, for the Gods will not involve thee in evil. But if indeed They do not exist, or if They have no concern about human affairs, then what is life to me to live in a universe devoid of Gods or devoid of Providence?"
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75782 From: fauxrari Date: 2010-05-09
Subject: Re: Temple of Cybele in Legal Trouble
Salve Maior, et. al-

While they aren't reconstructionists, we can learn from/help with their plight, for I could forsee something like this happening should we be lucky enough to get the chance to build a Roman religious sanctuary away from an historically contextal area (ie. building in Rome vs. building in the US; this coming from a girl who lives in a mostly Christian area that fought the building of a mosque for some time)...

Yes, please take care of NR first, but if you can help spreading the word, please do. I sent a link out to my historical re-enactment groups knowing that there are many 'pagans' out there who would be concerned about the issue, as well as modern re-constructionists (in both the re-enactment and NR sense, such as myself). It's the least we can do.

Gratias,

L. Antonia Auriga

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "rory12001" <rory12001@...> wrote:
>
> Salve Caeca;
> I agree with you and just I checked their website and calendar, they are pagans, goddess worshippers, but don't seem to be Roman reconstructionists at all.
>
> They are being discriminated against, why don't they contact the ACLU instead of spending money? Though at this point I don't see why all religious orgs shouldn't pay property tax.
> optime vale
> Maior
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "C.Maria Caeca" <c.mariacaeca@> wrote:
> >
> > Salvete Omnes,
> >
> > As much as I may sympathize with their organization, frankly, there are things NR needs to accomplish our own goals, stabilize our infrastructure, and provide services to our own citizens and Provinces. I don't think we are in a position to be contributing to anyone else's cause, at least at this point, especially since we know so little about this organization. However, having said that, I also think that such problems need our moral support, if nothing else, because the time may well come when their problems will become *our* problems, and we may need the help and support of the Polytheist community. Therefore, I encourage all citizens to research this, starting with the links already provided, and if you feel this situation deserves and needs your help, in whatever form you choose, that you supply that help. Perhaps the appropriate officials in NR might want to take a close look, also, to determine if we, as a group, would find it appropriate to express our support and solidarity with them.
> >
> > Valete Bene,
> > C. Maria Caeca
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75783 From: marcushoratius Date: 2010-05-09
Subject: a. d. VII Eidus Maiae: LEMURIA
M. Moravius Piscinus cultores Deorum, Quiritibus et omnibus salutem plurimam dicit: Diis bene iuvantibus simus.

Hodie est ante diem VII Eidus Maesiae; haec dies nefastus est: LEMURIA; Aestatis initium, Favonius aut Corus, interdum et pluviae.

With tulips and crocus now faded, the dogwood in full bloom as are the columbine, and the flowers of early summer beginning to bloom, it might seem a little odd to celebrate a festival for the dead. But this time of year serves as a reminder of the eternal spring of the Blessed Isles that awaits most. We do not really know the thoughts of early Romans on an afterlife. Only by inference of such festivals as the Lemuria are we certain that they held a belief in an afterlife. As Ovid tells it, "An ancient rite, the nocturnal lemuria, will be celebrated, bringing offerings to silent ghosts. . . Yet even (in the earliest times) people brought offerings to the ashes of the dead, as is their due. The grandson paid his respects at the tomb of his grandfather (Fasti 5.421-426)."

Our earliest references on how Romans thought about the dead living in an afterlife come from the comedies of Plautus. In "The Pot of Gold" we are addressed first by the Lar of the house (1-27). He tells us how in each generation of the family the paterfamilias has been more miserly towards him, and he in turn has been less benevolent to them. But the daughter of the current occupant prays to him every day and offers him gifts of wine and incense. By the story's end the Lar repays her kindness to him by revealing the lost Pot of Gold to provide her with a handsome dowry. In "Captivi" we find a different type of spirit of the dead, the Larvae who "goad men" (598), and there is mention of a Greek notion on the torments of the dead in the Underworld (998-999). In "Casina" (592) a man complains of how a deceased former lover torments him and his wife, calling this ghost a larva. In "Amphitryon" (777) a place is said to be "infested with Larvae." There is a distinction between the Lares who can be beneficial if given their proper due from the Larvae who are always harmful shades of the dead. In "Mostellaria" (499-500) Plautus speaks of an entirely different kind of ghost, who explains his own situation, "but for me, Orcus refuses to receive into Acheruntem, because prematurely am I without life." This is a Lemur. Pomponius Porphyrio, commenting on Horace, Epode 2.2.209, describes Lemures as "Shades of the Dead (who) wander the world of men before day break and in fact for this reason are they feared." Thus are the three general categories among the Manes. There are the helpful Lares, the always evil Larvae, and something in between, the Lemures who are detached from a family's worship of the Lares, but who are not necessarily evil. However, both "Lemures and Larvae are nocturnal and terrifying apparitions of ghosts and beasts (Nonius p. 135)."

The main shrine for worshiping the family Lares is at the lararium near the front door, or else at the hearth. Of course inviting Lares into the home can attract some unwanted spirits as well. Thus for the first night of Lemuria we are reminded of a ritual to chase out the Larvae and send away the Lemures from within the house itself.

"When midnight comes, lending silence to sleep, and all the dogs and hedgerow birds are quiet, he who remembers ancient rites, and fears the Gods, rises, no fetters binding his two feet, and makes the sign with thumb and closed fingers, lest an insubstantial shade meets him in the silence. After cleansing his hands in spring water, he turns and first taking some black beans, throws them with averted face: saying, while throwing: 'With these beans I throw I redeem me and mine.' Haec ego mitto, his redimo meque meosque fabis.

"He says this nine times without looking back: the shade is thought to gather the beans, and follow behind, unseen. Again he touches water, and sounds the Temesan bronze, and asks the spirit to leave his house. When nine times he's cried: 'Manes, exite paterni!' 'Ancestral spirit, depart' He looks back, and believes the sacred rite is fulfilled." ~ P. Ovidius Naso, Fasti 5.429-444

The ritual described by Ovid for Lemuria is one with which I can especially relate. I recall in the years before I went to school how my mother would rush us indoors before sunset on these days. She would lock the doors, pull down the shades, turn mirrors to the walls, do everything to prevent the Lemures from seeing us, for, as we were told, if the Lemures saw us, they would carry us away. Then my nonna would have us bang pot lids, rather than the gong of Temesan bronze, and howl like wolves to frighten the Lemures away, while she would spin about, aspersing all around with a wooden ladle filled with boiling water. The water sometimes splattered onto us, making us howl all the more. This was a rite that we performed three times a year. In winter, before my birthday in March, so I assume corresponding to Feralia. And I especially remember the time in fall, just after Halloween, so probably corresponding to the day in early November when the mundus was opened. And of course in May, when the evenings were beginning to get noticeably longer, and warmer, so naturally we children wished to play outside rather than be pulled indoors before the Lemures arrived. Besides, we sort of wished to see these terrible creatures of the night that so frightened my mother and hers.

Prior to performing this ritual one would perform a normal ritual before the lararium, calling upon Lares to aid in chasing out the unwanted guests. After all, the Lemures are struggling to find a home by squatting where properly the Lares alone belong. The gesture which Ovid describes is called the fica. The thumbs protruding through the fingers of the fists represent the genitalia of Genita Manua, Mother of the Manes, and call upon Her for protection against the Larvae. Beans, as we have seen earlier, are associated with the Underworld. Festus even describes them as something "thrown to the Larva at Lemuria (s. v. fabia)." You might think of it as a kind of spiritual spring cleaning. But of course this is only the first night of Lemuria, and there is more to the festival than just this rite.


Today's thought is from Stobaeus, Ethical Sentences 53:

"Nor will I be silent as to this particular, that it appeared both to Plato and Pythagoras that old age was not to be considered with reference to an egress from the present life, but to the beginning of a blessed life."
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75784 From: enodia2002 Date: 2010-05-09
Subject: Re: Temple of Cybele in Legal Trouble
Salvete, omnes!

I've requested from the legal group representing another pagan community under similar pressure copies of their sample letters in support of legal protection for pagan communities. Once I have them I will share them here.

Meanwhile, here is an update on the Maetreum of Cybele which is worth reading in light of NR's situation:



Last fall we were still trying to just find an attorney to represent us. Thanks to those who spread the word far and wide, we finally did find an attorney and a reasonably priced one at that. Thanks to a couple of very generous donations, our legal fees were also covered.

But that money is gone, the case is still in court as the Town of Catskill pulled out all legal stops to file motion after motion to dismiss. Recently the Judge ruled on those motions, in our favour. All that is required for us to do to keep the case before the court is re-serve the Town Assessor and now the County and School Board as well. This is happening right now. The attorney for the Town admitted in court, on the record, that the real reason for the denials of our property tax exemption (which is a lot of money btw) was to prevent “opening the floodgates to similar groups”. This is an open admission of discrimination. At this point, every single ruling by the Judge has been in our favour and we anticipate eventual victory.

The strain on our internal resources and deflection from our charitable mission has been considerable. Despite the fact the Town has failed to answer a single legal point and restricted itself to technical objections, once again we filed for 2010 exemption and were once again denied without a valid reason given. The county has sent us a notice that they will cease our property on Dec 31 of this year for the 2009 taxes we are still in litigation over and the 2010 taxes that are still in the appeals process. They did not say may or could, the letter clearly stated they would. Once they are served as party to this legal action in the next 48 hours we will file with the Judge for an injunction against them.

We feel we are fighting this cause not just for ourselves, but all minority religions. What we are asking of the Pagan communities at this point is this.

We need your continued spiritual support.

We could use your help raising addition money for legal fees. You can paypal a donation to centralhouse@... directly or use the donation button on our website at gallae.com

And one last thing. The “Board of Review” hearing for this year’s exemption is May 25 4-6 pm and 7-9 pm at the Town Hall in Catskill. We need a show of force, peaceful demonstrators because while we may and most likely will win this in court, they won’t stop every year unless we make the cost of that too high in bad public relations. Already I have started attending the Town meetings and calling them out and the press is taking notice. The local press will be at the Board of Review hearing.

If you can join us, please assemble at the Maetreum of Cybele in Palenville the afternoon of May 25. We need at least 15 or more to pull this off. If you can, make signs ahead of time with slogans such as “freedom of religion means all religions”

We are extremely grateful for the help we’ve received before, it made the difference between having our case dismissed and keeping it active. Our sincere thanks to the angels who donated before and especially to Jason of the Wild Hunt who really got the word out for us.

This seems like an excellent opportunity for Pagans in the upstate New York area to show solidarity, and win this organization the same legal considerations that are granted to the “mainstream” faiths in America. As always, I’ll be keeping track of this story as it develops.
--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "L. Livia Plauta" <livia.plauta@...> wrote:
>
> Salvete omnes,
> regardless of whether this Magna Mater temple is reconstructionist or not, I
> think it's a worthy object of our solidarity. What goes round, comes round.
> There is no knowing if we might face a similar situation in the future, and
> whether one agrees or not to religious organizations being exempt from
> estate taxes, it is important to uphold the principle that all religions
> should get equal treatment.
>
> If they are unable to obtain free legal assistance, even a symbolic donation
> from our budget could be a significant gesture.
> But what we can do to no cost is joining in any existing petition or
> creating one, writing letters to parliament representatives, local
> authorities, or whoever it is that people write to in these situations in
> the US. If the authorities that are creating trouble for the Magna Mater
> temple start receiving letters from all over the world, they might well
> re-evaluate the situation.
> Maybe some US citizen could provide a form letter we could send?
>
> Optime valete,
> Livia
>
>
> > Salvete,
> >
> > I came across the following news item today:
> >
> > http://wildhunt.org/blog/2010/05/update-on-the-maetreum-of-cybele-saga.html
> >
> > Apparently, a 3-acre pagan sanctuary and temple of the Magna Mater
> > (website here: http://gallae.com/) located in upstate New York is facing
> > legal problems with the town. Despite having received a 501(c)3
> > designation from the Internal Revenue Service, the town refuses to grant
> > them a tax exemption (apparently in contravention of New York state
> > law), and they are slated to have their property confiscated at the end
> > of this year. More details on both their website and the Wild Hunt link
> > I posted above, but I think this is absolutely shameful, and it is
> > something that we can, and should, get behind.
> >
> > Perhaps Nova Roma could make a donation to their legal defense fund?
> > Seems like a worthy use of the taxes we are called upon to pay.
> >
> > Vale,
> >
> > Flavius Vedius Germanicus
> > Pater Patriae
> >
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75785 From: C.Maria Caeca Date: 2010-05-09
Subject: Re: Temple of Cybele in Legal Trouble
Caeca Enodiae sal,

thank you very much for posting this! While I don't think our treasury is in a position to donate financially, I would hope that all cives who can, will do so. I would also encourage the following actions:

1. Send letters (or emails) of protest and support to the following organizations and institutions:
The Town counsel
2. The County administrators
3. Mayor of the town (should have been 2, sorry).
4. The Governor of NY.
5. The State legislature of NY, particularly the representatives for the county involved.
5. the U.S. House of Representatives, particularly the Representative for the district in which the county is located.
6. the United States Senate ...both Senators for NY State.
7. If you are feeling literary ...a "letter to the editor" of the local newspaper in the county or town.

I would also like to see an ex officio petition, constructed in, and issued by, the office of the Consuls, posted on our web site for the signatures of all interested cives and members, to be submitted to the Temple, for them to use as they see fit. I would hope that all citizens, especially those not living in the U.S. would sign this petition. Let the Government officials involved see that their actions are receiving, and will continue to receive International notice.

I expect that the Temple can provide names and email addresses for the groups I've mentioned above, but if not, this is all public information, and we can get it.

While these are not Roman Religio reconstructioniss, they *are* fellow pantheists, and I assure you that their problem *will* become our problem ...so it behooves us to do what we can, and we can do a great deal, without involving the use of our public funds, which, frankly, need to be spent on our own needs, at the moment.

Valete bene,
Respectfully,
C. Maria Caeca

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75786 From: Vedius Date: 2010-05-09
Subject: Re: Temple of Cybele in Legal Trouble
Salve,

There's more than $20,000 in the treasury. You really think a $100
donation would kill us?

Vale,

Flavius Vedius Germanicus

C.Maria Caeca wrote:
> Caeca Enodiae sal,
>
> thank you very much for posting this! While I don't think our treasury is in a position to donate financially, I would hope that all cives who can, will do so. I would also encourage the following actions:
>
> 1. Send letters (or emails) of protest and support to the following organizations and institutions:
> The Town counsel
> 2. The County administrators
> 3. Mayor of the town (should have been 2, sorry).
> 4. The Governor of NY.
> 5. The State legislature of NY, particularly the representatives for the county involved.
> 5. the U.S. House of Representatives, particularly the Representative for the district in which the county is located.
> 6. the United States Senate ...both Senators for NY State.
> 7. If you are feeling literary ...a "letter to the editor" of the local newspaper in the county or town.
>
> I would also like to see an ex officio petition, constructed in, and issued by, the office of the Consuls, posted on our web site for the signatures of all interested cives and members, to be submitted to the Temple, for them to use as they see fit. I would hope that all citizens, especially those not living in the U.S. would sign this petition. Let the Government officials involved see that their actions are receiving, and will continue to receive International notice.
>
> I expect that the Temple can provide names and email addresses for the groups I've mentioned above, but if not, this is all public information, and we can get it.
>
> While these are not Roman Religio reconstructioniss, they *are* fellow pantheists, and I assure you that their problem *will* become our problem ...so it behooves us to do what we can, and we can do a great deal, without involving the use of our public funds, which, frankly, need to be spent on our own needs, at the moment.
>
> Valete bene,
> Respectfully,
> C. Maria Caeca
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75787 From: Cato Date: 2010-05-09
Subject: Re: Temple of Cybele in Legal Trouble
Cato Vedio omnibusque in foro SPD

Agreed with Vedius, absolutely. Perhaps even $1000.00. I think the citizens should vote on the matter.

Valete,

Cato



--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Vedius <vedius@...> wrote:
>
> Salve,
>
> There's more than $20,000 in the treasury. You really think a $100
> donation would kill us?
>
> Vale,
>
> Flavius Vedius Germanicus
>
> C.Maria Caeca wrote:
> > Caeca Enodiae sal,
> >
> > thank you very much for posting this! While I don't think our treasury is in a position to donate financially, I would hope that all cives who can, will do so. I would also encourage the following actions:
> >
> > 1. Send letters (or emails) of protest and support to the following organizations and institutions:
> > The Town counsel
> > 2. The County administrators
> > 3. Mayor of the town (should have been 2, sorry).
> > 4. The Governor of NY.
> > 5. The State legislature of NY, particularly the representatives for the county involved.
> > 5. the U.S. House of Representatives, particularly the Representative for the district in which the county is located.
> > 6. the United States Senate ...both Senators for NY State.
> > 7. If you are feeling literary ...a "letter to the editor" of the local newspaper in the county or town.
> >
> > I would also like to see an ex officio petition, constructed in, and issued by, the office of the Consuls, posted on our web site for the signatures of all interested cives and members, to be submitted to the Temple, for them to use as they see fit. I would hope that all citizens, especially those not living in the U.S. would sign this petition. Let the Government officials involved see that their actions are receiving, and will continue to receive International notice.
> >
> > I expect that the Temple can provide names and email addresses for the groups I've mentioned above, but if not, this is all public information, and we can get it.
> >
> > While these are not Roman Religio reconstructioniss, they *are* fellow pantheists, and I assure you that their problem *will* become our problem ...so it behooves us to do what we can, and we can do a great deal, without involving the use of our public funds, which, frankly, need to be spent on our own needs, at the moment.
> >
> > Valete bene,
> > Respectfully,
> > C. Maria Caeca
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------------
> >
> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75788 From: C.Maria Caeca Date: 2010-05-09
Subject: Re: Temple of Cybele in Legal Trouble
Salve,

No, a $100.000 donation would not kill us. However, there are things we need to do with our funds, which should be done *before* we contribute financially, as an official action.

1. We need professional IT services, services extensive enough that we should be willing to pay for them. Using volunteers for most things is fine ...but the work involved in maintaining our web site is a major undertaking, and, when we use people who make their living in this field, not compensating them is unfair, if not exploitation.

2. I think it would be appropriate to establish a fund to assist those Sacerdotes who are performing rituals and rites (with appropriate documentation, of course) for the citizens of Nova Roma, or as public rituals.

3. Some of our volunteers find themselves performing what amounts to full time jobs, and I think we should be showing our appreciation of that with a stipend, even a small stipend. I am thinking especially of our Latin instructors, especially A. Tullia Scholastica, who has, for years, spent an inordinate amount of her time teaching us, and teaching us extremely well.

4. While provinces can have access to money produced by taxes, I would like to see even more support given to them, for special projects, and, especially for both Convent(I?).

When these things have been done fully, we can use excess funds for such purposes as donations to worthy causes. Until then, doing so seems to me to be imprudent at best, and a form of ego gratification and posturing, at worst.

Respectfully,
C. Maria Caeca

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75789 From: Cato Date: 2010-05-09
Subject: Re: Temple of Cybele in Legal Trouble
Cato Caecae sal.

And equally respectfully, several of us have been repeatedly - for years now - trying to create and gain support for a funding system that subsidizes all kinds of things - including exactly the kinds of things you mention - yet nothing gets done.

I think it highly imprudent to continue to sit on our hands and do nothing at all, which we seem to be very very good at.

Vale,

Cato



--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "C.Maria Caeca" <c.mariacaeca@...> wrote:
>
> Salve,
>
> No, a $100.000 donation would not kill us. However, there are things we need to do with our funds, which should be done *before* we contribute financially, as an official action.
>
> 1. We need professional IT services, services extensive enough that we should be willing to pay for them. Using volunteers for most things is fine ...but the work involved in maintaining our web site is a major undertaking, and, when we use people who make their living in this field, not compensating them is unfair, if not exploitation.
>
> 2. I think it would be appropriate to establish a fund to assist those Sacerdotes who are performing rituals and rites (with appropriate documentation, of course) for the citizens of Nova Roma, or as public rituals.
>
> 3. Some of our volunteers find themselves performing what amounts to full time jobs, and I think we should be showing our appreciation of that with a stipend, even a small stipend. I am thinking especially of our Latin instructors, especially A. Tullia Scholastica, who has, for years, spent an inordinate amount of her time teaching us, and teaching us extremely well.
>
> 4. While provinces can have access to money produced by taxes, I would like to see even more support given to them, for special projects, and, especially for both Convent(I?).
>
> When these things have been done fully, we can use excess funds for such purposes as donations to worthy causes. Until then, doing so seems to me to be imprudent at best, and a form of ego gratification and posturing, at worst.
>
> Respectfully,
> C. Maria Caeca
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75790 From: Vedius Date: 2010-05-09
Subject: Re: Temple of Cybele in Legal Trouble
Salve,

I would agree with all those efforts, but I would also point out that it
is not necessarily the best thing to wait until everything we *want* to
do is done in the future, before doing something very modest that we
*can* do today.

Vale,

Flavius Vedius Germanicus
Pater Patriae

C.Maria Caeca wrote:
> Salve,
>
> No, a $100.000 donation would not kill us. However, there are things we need to do with our funds, which should be done *before* we contribute financially, as an official action.
>
> 1. We need professional IT services, services extensive enough that we should be willing to pay for them. Using volunteers for most things is fine ...but the work involved in maintaining our web site is a major undertaking, and, when we use people who make their living in this field, not compensating them is unfair, if not exploitation.
>
> 2. I think it would be appropriate to establish a fund to assist those Sacerdotes who are performing rituals and rites (with appropriate documentation, of course) for the citizens of Nova Roma, or as public rituals.
>
> 3. Some of our volunteers find themselves performing what amounts to full time jobs, and I think we should be showing our appreciation of that with a stipend, even a small stipend. I am thinking especially of our Latin instructors, especially A. Tullia Scholastica, who has, for years, spent an inordinate amount of her time teaching us, and teaching us extremely well.
>
> 4. While provinces can have access to money produced by taxes, I would like to see even more support given to them, for special projects, and, especially for both Convent(I?).
>
> When these things have been done fully, we can use excess funds for such purposes as donations to worthy causes. Until then, doing so seems to me to be imprudent at best, and a form of ego gratification and posturing, at worst.
>
> Respectfully,
> C. Maria Caeca
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75791 From: rory12001 Date: 2010-05-09
Subject: Re: Temple of Cybele in Legal Trouble
Salvete;
so give them money. Be Roman, citizens would personally support temples, that's how they attained dignitas. They would also underwrite sacrifices with dinners.
The Roman state underwrote state cults and that's it; their sacrifices were 'pro populo' for the people of Rome. This is all on behalf of the Roman community as part of the Pax Deorum.

So it would be unRoman and making us 'faux christians' for the state to support cults that don't glorify and extend the pax deorum, it all has to do with the ties of the Roman gods to the Roman community; that is what we're all about!
there are lots of good books on the subject, do find them here:
Beard and North is the best introduction to Roman state and religio
http://www.novaroma.org/nr/Reading_list_for_the_cultus_deorum
optime vale
M. Hortensia Maior


--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Vedius <vedius@...> wrote:
>
> Salve,
>
> I would agree with all those efforts, but I would also point out that it
> is not necessarily the best thing to wait until everything we *want* to
> do is done in the future, before doing something very modest that we
> *can* do today.
>
> Vale,
>
> Flavius Vedius Germanicus
> Pater Patriae
>
> C.Maria Caeca wrote:
> > Salve,
> >
> > No, a $100.000 donation would not kill us. However, there are things we need to do with our funds, which should be done *before* we contribute financially, as an official action.
> >
> > 1. We need professional IT services, services extensive enough that we should be willing to pay for them. Using volunteers for most things is fine ...but the work involved in maintaining our web site is a major undertaking, and, when we use people who make their living in this field, not compensating them is unfair, if not exploitation.
> >
> > 2. I think it would be appropriate to establish a fund to assist those Sacerdotes who are performing rituals and rites (with appropriate documentation, of course) for the citizens of Nova Roma, or as public rituals.
> >
> > 3. Some of our volunteers find themselves performing what amounts to full time jobs, and I think we should be showing our appreciation of that with a stipend, even a small stipend. I am thinking especially of our Latin instructors, especially A. Tullia Scholastica, who has, for years, spent an inordinate amount of her time teaching us, and teaching us extremely well.
> >
> > 4. While provinces can have access to money produced by taxes, I would like to see even more support given to them, for special projects, and, especially for both Convent(I?).
> >
> > When these things have been done fully, we can use excess funds for such purposes as donations to worthy causes. Until then, doing so seems to me to be imprudent at best, and a form of ego gratification and posturing, at worst.
> >
> > Respectfully,
> > C. Maria Caeca
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------------
> >
> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75792 From: Vedius Date: 2010-05-09
Subject: Re: Temple of Cybele in Legal Trouble
lol... how fortunate for us that we have you as the final arbiter of
what is and is not Roman.

rory12001 wrote:
> Salvete;
> so give them money. Be Roman, citizens would personally support temples, that's how they attained dignitas. They would also underwrite sacrifices with dinners.
> The Roman state underwrote state cults and that's it; their sacrifices were 'pro populo' for the people of Rome. This is all on behalf of the Roman community as part of the Pax Deorum.
>
> So it would be unRoman and making us 'faux christians' for the state to support cults that don't glorify and extend the pax deorum, it all has to do with the ties of the Roman gods to the Roman community; that is what we're all about!
> there are lots of good books on the subject, do find them here:
> Beard and North is the best introduction to Roman state and religio
> http://www.novaroma.org/nr/Reading_list_for_the_cultus_deorum
> optime vale
> M. Hortensia Maior
>
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Vedius <vedius@...> wrote:
>
>> Salve,
>>
>> I would agree with all those efforts, but I would also point out that it
>> is not necessarily the best thing to wait until everything we *want* to
>> do is done in the future, before doing something very modest that we
>> *can* do today.
>>
>> Vale,
>>
>> Flavius Vedius Germanicus
>> Pater Patriae
>>
>> C.Maria Caeca wrote:
>>
>>> Salve,
>>>
>>> No, a $100.000 donation would not kill us. However, there are things we need to do with our funds, which should be done *before* we contribute financially, as an official action.
>>>
>>> 1. We need professional IT services, services extensive enough that we should be willing to pay for them. Using volunteers for most things is fine ...but the work involved in maintaining our web site is a major undertaking, and, when we use people who make their living in this field, not compensating them is unfair, if not exploitation.
>>>
>>> 2. I think it would be appropriate to establish a fund to assist those Sacerdotes who are performing rituals and rites (with appropriate documentation, of course) for the citizens of Nova Roma, or as public rituals.
>>>
>>> 3. Some of our volunteers find themselves performing what amounts to full time jobs, and I think we should be showing our appreciation of that with a stipend, even a small stipend. I am thinking especially of our Latin instructors, especially A. Tullia Scholastica, who has, for years, spent an inordinate amount of her time teaching us, and teaching us extremely well.
>>>
>>> 4. While provinces can have access to money produced by taxes, I would like to see even more support given to them, for special projects, and, especially for both Convent(I?).
>>>
>>> When these things have been done fully, we can use excess funds for such purposes as donations to worthy causes. Until then, doing so seems to me to be imprudent at best, and a form of ego gratification and posturing, at worst.
>>>
>>> Respectfully,
>>> C. Maria Caeca
>>>
>>> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ------------------------------------
>>>
>>> Yahoo! Groups Links
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75793 From: C.Maria Caeca Date: 2010-05-09
Subject: Re: Temple of Cybele in Legal Trouble
C. Maria Caeca Vedio patero Patriae Salutem Plurimum Dicit:

Under normal circumstances, I would agree with you unreservedly. However, our officials and Senate have demonstrated a preference for making showy, attention getting financial gestures, and using them to evade and ignore those internal matters which, though they are noticed only by our citizens, would solidify and secure our own infrastructure. Therefore, I cannot, in good conscience, support something which is, essentially, external, until the Governing bodies of this Nation show their willingness to be responsible to its citizens, and attend to those internal matters in need of support. I am not of the opinion, either, that "action for action's sake" is commendable, or even wise. In fact, it has been my experience that such a policy is often, at best ill-advised.

Vale,

Respectfully,
CMC, who is only a citizen whose views, as you demonstrate in your signature, have no value ...but who will express them, nonetheless.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75794 From: rory12001 Date: 2010-05-09
Subject: Re: Temple of Cybele in Legal Trouble
Salve Caeca;
please I'd like to know what these things are, the showy attention-getting gestures are and what infrastructure we are ignoring. I for sure would like to know.

Vedi, we're a reconstructionist org. I'm a researcher, I read a lot of scholarly books and work as a group with the PM Piscinus and the entire Collegium Pontificum. I share my knowledge with everyone via book lists, discussions and nrwiki articles. Over at the Scholasticum list I'll send anyone who requests material from JSTOR.

I joined Nova Roma as a reconstructionist roman polytheist, not as a neopagan or secularist and I assume the others feel the same way; there are plenty of other orgs out there for them, only 1 Nova Roma!
di nobis favent
M. Hortensia Maior
Flaminica Carmentalis
>
> C. Maria Caeca Vedio patero Patriae Salutem Plurimum Dicit:
>
> Under normal circumstances, I would agree with you unreservedly. However, our officials and Senate have demonstrated a preference for making showy, attention getting financial gestures, and using them to evade and ignore those internal matters which, though they are noticed only by our citizens, would solidify and secure our own infrastructure. Therefore, I cannot, in good conscience, support something which is, essentially, external, until the Governing bodies of this Nation show their willingness to be responsible to its citizens, and attend to those internal matters in need of support. I am not of the opinion, either, that "action for action's sake" is commendable, or even wise. In fact, it has been my experience that such a policy is often, at best ill-advised.
>
> Vale,
>
> Respectfully,
> CMC, who is only a citizen whose views, as you demonstrate in your signature, have no value ...but who will express them, nonetheless.
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75795 From: C.Maria Caeca Date: 2010-05-09
Subject: Re: Temple of Cybele in Legal Trouble
C. Maria Caeca M. Hortensiae Maori S. P. D.

I listed those things in our infrastructure which I feel are acutely in need of attention in a very recent post. As to the showy gestures ...

1. scholarships which appear to be provided at the pleasure of the ruling Consul of the moment, for there is no public documentation, and for which there has been no attempt at accountability to the citizens.

. Donations to disaster funds where no Novae Romani were affected.

These are the 2 which immediately occur. There are others, but I do not wish to deflect the issue with the controversy mentioning them would necessarily raise.

Vale Bene,
CMC

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75796 From: rory12001 Date: 2010-05-09
Subject: Re: Temple of Cybele in Legal Trouble
Maior Caecae spd;
I agree with you about the disaster funds, the scholarship needs to be transparant I agree entirely.

We should spend more time on ritual and reconstruction where we are than wasting our talents.
vale
Maior

>
> 1. scholarships which appear to be provided at the pleasure of the ruling Consul of the moment, for there is no public documentation, and for which there has been no attempt at accountability to the citizens.
>
> . Donations to disaster funds where no Novae Romani were affected.
>
> These are the 2 which immediately occur. There are others, but I do not wish to deflect the issue with the controversy mentioning them would necessarily raise.
>
> Vale Bene,
> CMC
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75797 From: marcushoratius Date: 2010-05-10
Subject: a. d. VI Eidus Maiae: Rosalia; divus Claudius II
M. Moravius Piscinus cultores Deorum, Quiritibus et omnibus salutem plurimam dicit: Di vos salvam et servatam volunt.

Hodie est ante diem VI Eidus Maesiae; haec dies comitialis est: Rosalia; Vergiliae totae apparent, Favonius aut Corus, interdum et pluviae.

AUC 957 / 214 CE: Birth of Marcus Aurelius Claudius Gothicus, Emperor 268-270 CE.

At the time divus Claudius came to the throne, nine days before the calends of April, the empire was in a dire straits. First he had to contend with the pretender Aureolus at Milan. Gaul, Hispania, Britannia, and parts of the eastern empire had been seized by foreign powers or broken away in rebellion. The remainder was exhausted after the rule of the two Gallieni, and then it was invaded by Goths, Scythians, the Peucini, Greuthungi, Austrogothi, Tervingi, Visi, and Gepedes, and also by the Celts and the Eruli, followed by an invasion of Egypt by the Palmyrenes. Somehow, in the short time of only two years, he managed to overcome all of Rome's adversaries and set the Empire on a course towards recovery. His final contest with the Goths was aided by a pestilence that first devastated the barbarian army, but which afterward spread to the empire and took the life of Claudius as well. He was succeeded by his brother Quintillus, who was killed by his own soldiers after only seventeen days as emperor.


Rosalia

Noted on the military calendar from Dura Europa, the Rosalia was held on the tenth and thirty-first of May. Military standards were kept in the aedes at the center of a camp. It was the temple of the military unit. And like other temples at Rome, an altar was set up outside the aedes. At the Rosalia the standards were brought forth from the aedes and placed by the altar. They were crowned with wreaths of roses and a supplication, or thanksgiving, was performed before them. Beyond that one detail, nothing else is certain about this military ritual. But from its nature we can surmise something of its intent.

When someone died far from home, whether while serving in the army or away at sea, and thus was unable to be buried by his family, a cenotaphium would be erected as a dwelling place for his soul. His Lar was called three times, invited to enter the cenotaphium, as where Aeneas, upon meeting Deiphobus in the Underworld says, "Then I myself on the Rhoetean shore erected a hollow tomb, and with loud voice thrice called upon thy spirit (Aeneid 6.505-506)." Much of the month of May was devoted to the honored dead, and we have seen days earlier how on the Nones a rite was held whereby the tombs of the ancestors were decorated with wreaths of roses. Similar to the practice of dusting the dead with red ochre, a practice seen in various cultures from the time of the Neolithic or even earlier, or even with the practice of painting the statue of Jupiter Capitolinus with cinnabar, or how Camillus was painted red for his triumph, red roses were offered to the dead as a gesture of reviving them. Or at least to remember them while still alive. Red roses were the flowers of Venus, who held providence over the Blessed Isles. So offering them to the Manes was a way of wishing their safe journey on to the gardens of Venus.

There is not much doubt that the Rosalia was intended to honor the military dead. The standards were being adorned in the same manner as tombs. With the Romans I think you would also have to consider that they thought of the standards as cenotaphia, carrying the Lares of their fellow soldiers into battle with them. This also explains why the loss of the eagles would be taken as such a tragedy. The second century Christian writer Tertullian criticized this veneration of the standards, but it was to continue well afterward and something of the Rosalia remains even to day in the parading of the colors of modern armies.


Capillor and Puteal

"To be sure, superior to the kind of auguries taken in the established stations of the augurs (stativa augurii) are those we call capillores, that is a place He (Jove) has touched. Indeed a Capillor is so called when a tree is auspiciously taken and consecrated by Jove's lightning bolt." ~ Servius Honorius, Ad Aeneis 10, 423

Whenever lightning struck the earth all that was scorched was regarded as holy as it contained a numen of Jupiter. Everything that had been struck and burnt, including the scorched soil, would be gathered into a wooden four-sided box for burial; the box having no bottom (Lucan 1.606). Over this grave would be placed mounded earth and a circular stone wall built to enclose the area as a sanctuary that was called a puteal. In the case where a person was struck by lightning, the body could not be cremated but had to be buried in the puteal along with all else scorched by the lightning. An haruspex or a fulgator would have to be called in to designate the area to be set off as the puteal in the same way that an an augur would take auspicial to erect a templum. Then a special sacrifice of a bidens was required, where a bidens is explained as a sheep that is old enough to have two teeth and no more than two-years old (Pliny Hist. Nat. 2.145; Festus p27; Nonius p53, 26). We may posit that the ritual for establishing a puteal would have also included the sacrifice negotiated by Numa Pompilius when he prayed, "King and Father of the high Gods, grant sure appeasement of the thunderbolt (Ovid Fasti 3.327-348)." That is, leeks and fish.

Reference to a puteal is found among the other shrines of a country estate: "an altar wreathed with flowers, a grotto shaded with foliage, an oak hung with horns, a beech with animal skins, or a consecrated knoll surrounded by a fence (a puteal), a tree trunk in which a hatchet has carved a divine effigy, a patch of turf sprinkled with libations, a stone anointed with oil (Florides 1. 3-4)." In each type of shrine it is the divine presence, or numen, that sanctifies the place. None, though, would be higher than a shrine infused with the numen of Jupiter. It would be the proximity to His numen housed in a puteal that then made a capillor a special place to take auspices, one that Jupiter Himself had designated.


Our thought for this season of Lemuria is taken from Marcus Aurelius, Meditations 5.33:

"Soon, very soon, thou wilt be ashes, or a skeleton, and either a name or not even a name; but name is sound and echo. And the things which are much valued in life are empty and rotten and trifling, and like little dogs biting one another, and little children quarrelling, laughing, and then straightway weeping. But fidelity and modesty and justice and truth are 'fled up to Olympus from the wide-spread earth.' What then is there which still detains thee here? If the objects of sense are easily changed and never stand still, and the organs of perception are dull and easily receive false impressions; and the poor soul itself is an exhalation from blood. But to have good repute amidst such a world as this is an empty thing. Why then dost thou not wait in tranquility for thy end, whether it is extinction or removal to another state? And until that time comes, what is sufficient? Why, what else than to venerate the gods and bless them, and to do good to men, and to practise tolerance and self-restraint; but as to everything which is beyond the limits of the poor flesh and breath, to remember that this is neither thine nor in thy power."
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75798 From: Cato Date: 2010-05-10
Subject: Re: Temple of Cybele in Legal Trouble
Cato omnibus in foro SPD

Look, if it's so important to you, praetor, why don't you sponsor legislation creating these Funds we've been talking about for so long? You've gotten suggestions: Pontifical Fund, Aedilician Fund, etc., so you know people are interested, and Caeca's recent observations only drive the point home.

Praetor, you're part of the government. Instead of just talking, act.

Vale,

Cato



--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "rory12001" <rory12001@...> wrote:
>
> Maior Caecae spd;
> I agree with you about the disaster funds, the scholarship needs to be transparant I agree entirely.
>
> We should spend more time on ritual and reconstruction where we are than wasting our talents.
> vale
> Maior
>
> >
> > 1. scholarships which appear to be provided at the pleasure of the ruling Consul of the moment, for there is no public documentation, and for which there has been no attempt at accountability to the citizens.
> >
> > . Donations to disaster funds where no Novae Romani were affected.
> >
> > These are the 2 which immediately occur. There are others, but I do not wish to deflect the issue with the controversy mentioning them would necessarily raise.
> >
> > Vale Bene,
> > CMC
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75799 From: Gaius Lucretius Seneca Date: 2010-05-10
Subject: Re: Temple of Cybele in Legal Trouble
On 5/9/2010 11:29 AM, C.Maria Caeca wrote:
>
> 1. We need professional IT services, services extensive enough that we
> should be willing to pay for them. Using volunteers for most things is
> fine ...but the work involved in maintaining our web site is a major
> undertaking, and, when we use people who make their living in this
> field, not compensating them is unfair, if not exploitation.
>

Salvete omnes! I am a new member of Nova Roma, having been granted
provisional citizenship a week ago. I've been meaning to say hello on
the list, which I've been following for several months and have noticed
several mentions of a need for website services - which happens to be my
area of expertise. My partner and I run a website hosting and design
company (http://telavant.com/) and so, though I'm new and unproven, I
thought I'd offer our services. We could host a server for the website
and I'm an expert-level PHP programmer.

I also have some thoughts and ambitions toward someday building some
kind of interactive experience for Nova Romans - a "Virtual Rome" where
cives can meet online and chat. Would anyone be interested in having
such a thing, or helping to build it? This of course would be a
volunteer project. I'm thinking a text-based environment (like a MUD,
if any of you have played one of those) might be ideal.

Optime valete!


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75800 From: Cato Date: 2010-05-10
Subject: CALL FOR ELECTIONS
Cato omnibus in foro SPD

It is apparent that our government has forgotten that we are still without a colleague for the curule aedile. I formally request that the law regarding filling vacant magistracies be obeyed and elections held swiftly.

Valete,

Cato
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75801 From: Vedius Date: 2010-05-10
Subject: A Virtual Rome (as Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: Temple of Cybele in Legal Tro
Salve,

While I no longer function in any official capacity in our fair Res
Publica, let me first welcome you, Gaius Lucretius Seneca, and thank you
for your generous offer. I am sure that once the Senate comes up with an
official RFQ, you and your partner will be in consideration.

I would like to comment on your idea about a "virtual Rome", and how it
might fit in with the idea of what Nova Roma is, at least as it was
originally conceived.

The Internet is, without a doubt, an extremely valuable tool for Nova
Roma. It allows us to exchange ideas, get our message out, and attract
new and enthusiastic cives such as yourself. However, the goal of Nova
Roma has always been firmly planted in the real world; it is my belief
that our efforts should be on physical shrines rather than virtual
website shrines, real-world gatherings rather than online chats, and
that we should aspire towards one day having a physical Forum that we
can call our own. While chat rooms, web sites, and email lists are
excellent tools to help fulfill those real-world goals, it should always
be remembered that the virtual should never replace the physical. My
fear would be that such a virtual Rome would edge towards doing exactly
that.

Naturally, many will disagree with me (and, indeed, I can mentally name
a few that will come out of the gate swinging against this email, with
all manner of things to say about me), but while I would welcome any
enterprise that would bring us more together in the physical world, I'm
not quite sure how a "virtual Rome" would do that, at least any more
than our existing email lists, web sites, and chat rooms do. Perhaps I'm
not understanding your proposal properly?

Again, welcome, and please don't take my thoughts as any intentional
dampening of your enthusiasm. But enthusiasm channeled in the right
direction is infinitely more valuable, I believe, than enthusiasm
pointing down a divergent road.

Vale,

Flavius Vedius Germanicus
Pater Patriae


Gaius Lucretius Seneca wrote:
> On 5/9/2010 11:29 AM, C.Maria Caeca wrote:
>
>> 1. We need professional IT services, services extensive enough that we
>> should be willing to pay for them. Using volunteers for most things is
>> fine ...but the work involved in maintaining our web site is a major
>> undertaking, and, when we use people who make their living in this
>> field, not compensating them is unfair, if not exploitation.
>>
>>
>
> Salvete omnes! I am a new member of Nova Roma, having been granted
> provisional citizenship a week ago. I've been meaning to say hello on
> the list, which I've been following for several months and have noticed
> several mentions of a need for website services - which happens to be my
> area of expertise. My partner and I run a website hosting and design
> company (http://telavant.com/) and so, though I'm new and unproven, I
> thought I'd offer our services. We could host a server for the website
> and I'm an expert-level PHP programmer.
>
> I also have some thoughts and ambitions toward someday building some
> kind of interactive experience for Nova Romans - a "Virtual Rome" where
> cives can meet online and chat. Would anyone be interested in having
> such a thing, or helping to build it? This of course would be a
> volunteer project. I'm thinking a text-based environment (like a MUD,
> if any of you have played one of those) might be ideal.
>
> Optime valete!
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75802 From: C.Maria Caeca Date: 2010-05-10
Subject: Re: A Virtual Rome (as Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: Temple of Cybele in Legal
Salvete omnes,

First of all, welcome to NR, Seneca, and congratulations on your provisional citizenship status. I hope that you will become a full and active citizen in our Res Publica, and that you will find your time with valuable as well as pleasurable.

Now, then. I have said this before, and I will keep saying it ...I strongly believe that we should use *all* resources available to us, to their utmost, not only to accomplish our primary goals, but to help us grown our Nation, to bond as far flung cives, to explore our options, and to provide ourselves with a sense of community that knits us closely together so that, when we do achieve our own physical presence, our own forum and other things, we will be ready and able to better use and develop these things, having already decided what, and how, we want to proceed, and having already worked out the "kinks" all Governments face and must deal with. If we work wisely and well, when we come to our land, we will come to it not just as a group of individuals who are a bit unsure of what to do next, but as a Nation, whose citizens are physically going "home", even if that "home" is not the place where we conduct the business of daily living.

I find it disheartening to read the internet treated as some sort of ...not quite respectable "make do" piece of technology that we only use because we must. I disagree with that, because using it to its utmost allows us to nourish ourselves in ways that we could not, otherwise, and allows us to truly establish our spiritual, emotional and ideological identity. In no way does it detract from our ultimate goal, unless we allow it to do so ...but *not* to make strong use of this resource, (distasteful as it seems to some, here), ultimately *will* hamper us, because we will become, eventually, isolated pockets of local activity, reporting infrequently to other isolated pockets of local activity, and not allowing for the cross pollination of ideas, methods, things that work and things that don't. Unless we wish to stop being an International community (and I know some who would very much like that), we would be well advised to use any means by which we can bring ourselves closer to one another. I have seen some lovely virtual shrines, and I have no problem with them ...they do not replace the real thing, and cannot, quite obviously, but they do provide a real service, and I have found them of benefit. Does that mean that I do not wish to take part, physically in the rituals of the Sacra Publica, or make a sacrifice at a physical temple? Of *course* it does not! If anything, such "places" whet my appetite for doing so. Meanwhile, until that is possible, I sustain myself with my private rites, and those few, but lovely virtual temples I have found.

Seneca, I have no idea what you are talking about ...but it sounds fascinating, and, if and when you create it, if it is accessible to my screen reading software, expect me there!

Vale et valete bene,
C. Maria Caeca

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75804 From: nathan_jeffrey_allen Date: 2010-05-10
Subject: Scribe? To All Magistrates!
Salve. My Name is Gaius Apollonius Agrippa. Real Name Nathan Jeffrey Allen
and I want to offer my services as a scribe. Please advise. Vale.

Gaius Apollonius Agrippa.

Nathan Jeffrey Allen.

Nathan_Jeffrey_Allen@...
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75805 From: Eric Broadhead Date: 2010-05-10
Subject: (no subject)
Greetings, I am a new  in the citizen America Boreoccidentalis in Rigio I. Could someone assist me so I can get more connected to my region. Thank you very much and I am very excited to be apart. Not sure my Roman name yet.....

Eric Broadhead





[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75806 From: rory12001 Date: 2010-05-10
Subject: America Boreoccidentalis
Salve Eric;
V. Rutilia Enodiaria is the governor of your province. Here is her page from the Album Civium where you can email her
http://www.novaroma.org/civitas/album?id=8104
bonam fortunam and bene vale
M. Hortensia Maior

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Eric Broadhead <eric.broadhead@...> wrote:
>
> Greetings, I am a new in the citizen America Boreoccidentalis in Rigio I. Could someone assist me so I can get more connected to my region. Thank you very much and I am very excited to be apart. Not sure my Roman name yet.....
>
> Eric Broadhead
>
>
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75807 From: C.Maria Caeca Date: 2010-05-10
Subject: Re: (unknown)
Salve, Eric ...and a very hearty welcome to Nova Roma! I'm afraid I can't with you region question, but others can, and will. Meanwhile ...one of the first things you will want to do is to choose your Roman name, and then, well, explore! BTW, there is a list for new potential citizens where we strive to give help with basic things and let you get acclimated to NR in a friendly, supportive environment. Please do come join us by sending an email to:

Newroman-subscribe@yahoogroups.com and I do hope you stay with us will be valuable to you on many levels, as well as very enjoyable!

Vale bene,
C. Maria Caeca

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75808 From: marcushoratius Date: 2010-05-11
Subject: a. d. V Eidus Maiae: LEMURIA
M. Moravius Piscinus cultores Deorum, Quiritibus et omnibus salutem plurimam dicit: Ditis ego omnis ut fortunas sint precor.

Hodie est ante diem V Eidus Maesiae; haec dies nefastus est: LEMURIA.

"Mother Earth, indeed to You I pray, settle lightly on these bones, as she knew that piety is the reward of she who merits it, and whoever sincerely stands out in performing her own pious duties may be carried on that happy path to the Gods above." ~ CIL 6, 9204

We are able to get an idea of what the Romans believed on an afterlife from the thousands of funerary inscriptions they have left. Among these thousands there are very few that express a disbelief based in Epicurian philosophy – "I shall be; I am, I am no more; I don't care." Another philosophical expression, very rare, too, is "I am ashes, Earth is ashes; Earth is a Goddess, therefore am I not dead (CIL 6, 4, 29609)." Far more inscriptions express ideas like the one above. Pious attention for the rites of the deceased is to be justly rewarded by rites given you by your descendants, and those who are most deserving shall also be led to a heavenly home in commune with the Gods. Those good souls who do not go on to the celestial Via Sacra instead find their way to the Blessed Isles where it is eternally spring in the Garden of Venus. Typically Roman funerary iconography shows the deceased travelling to the Blessed Isles that lie beyond the Western Sea. Images of the Blessed Isles show the souls of the dead as winged Cupids, children of Venus, engaged in idyllic settings. Among the Cupids is an infant Minerva wearing Her helmet and aegis and an infant Hercules wearing His lion skin, where both Minerva and Hercules played a role in mortals attaining immortality as Lares. Sometimes these ideas entered into the funeral ritual itself.

"Marcus Varro, as one example, was placed in leaves of myrtle, olive and black poplar after the Pythagorean fashion." ~ C. Plinius Secundus, Historia Natura 35, 160

Myrtle, as we all know, is sacred to Venus, the olive to Minerva, and the black polar was associated with Hercules. Roman thoughts of the eternal spring of the Blessed Isles find expression in many places. One is found with Persius.

"Grant, O Gods, that the earth may lie soft and gently upon the shades of our ancestors, and may their urns be filled with a perpetual springtime blooming with the sweet scents of crocus." ~ Persius, Satura 7, 207-208

Most of the funerary inscriptions, however, follow a formula: R. I. P. for "requiescit in pace" that is itself a shorter version of "Hic in pace requiescit sanctae benae memoriae." Most often found is simply "D. M." followed by the name of the deceased and his age. One that particularly interests me is CIL 13, 11291 from Rheims which reads: "D. M. Pisc." The D. M. stands for Dis Manibus to whom the family members pray on behalf of the deceased that the Manes may lead the deceased on his journey to the Blessed Isles. Also expressed is that the Di Manes accept the deceased among them, in order that he may go to the Blessed Isles or to a celestial abode, and also that the deceased would then become a Lar who might continue to aid and advise the living members of his family. And thus we come upon an inscription of a woman praying to the Di manes for her husband.

"Whole-heartedly I pray to you, most holy Manes, may you admit my dear husband among you, and, may you want to be most indulging in this, that in the hours of the night I may see him and also be advised by him on what to do, in order that I may be able to swiftly and sweetly come stand by his side." ~ CIL 6, 18817

But if there is no one to offer proper rites for the deceased, if he has no descendants to carry on the rites afterward, or who neglect his rites, or if for some reason the Di Manes refuse to admit the deceased among their community, then there would be no place for the deceased to rest and forever must he roam in search of a home.

At Lemuria, therefore, we recall all of our Roman forefathers and foremothers whose rites were neglected for so many centuries. Perhaps, if you live within what was once the boundaries of the Empire you might offer rites to those who lie nearby. We recall our own sanctis Maiores like Popillius Strabo, Sempronia, and Marius Maior. Some honor Augustus, the Gracchi, the Scipios or the Fabii, inviting them to become members of their own family Lares. And for the rest, those who have become Lemures due to circumstance, we provide with offerings, remembering that they, too, are part of our Roman community. The central focus of the religio Romana is the cultus owed to one's family Lares. All else is founded on that pietatis. The larger community of cultores Deorum invite the Gods to become part of their community. But we must not forget, nor neglect, the Manes as part of our community, too. Embracing the Manes as our own, in our rites, is what shall lead to the springtime of the religio Romana.


Aurelianus and Apollonius of Tyana

Here is a story of how one Lar, a famous philosopher, saved his native city.

"Emperor Aurelian did indeed truly speak and truly think of destroying the city of Tyana; but Apollonius of Tyana, a sage of the greatest renown and authority, a philosopher of former days, the true friend of the gods, and himself even to be regarded as a supernatural being, as Aurelian was withdrawing to his tent, suddenly appeared to him in the form in which he is usually portrayed, and spoke to him as follows, using Latin in order that he might be understood by a man from Pannonia: 'Aurelian, if you wish to conquer, there is no reason why you should plan the death of my fellow-citizens. Aurelian, if you wish to rule, abstain from the blood of the innocent. Aurelian, act with mercy if you wish to live long.' Aurelian recognized the countenance of the venerated philosopher, and, in fact, he had seen his portrait in many a temple. And so, at once stricken with terror, he promised him a portrait and statues and a temple, and returned to his better self. This incident I have learned from trustworthy men and read over again in the books in the Ulpian Library, and I have been the more ready to believe it because of the reverence in which Apollonius is held. For who among men has ever been more venerated, more revered, more renowned, or more holy than that very man? He brought the dead back to life, he said and did many things beyond the power of man." ~ Historia Augusta, Life of divus Aurelianus 24.3-8


Our thought for today is from Marcus Aurelius, Meditations 7.70:

"The Gods who are immortal are not vexed because during so long a time They must continually tolerate men such as they are and so many of them bad; and besides this, the Gods also take care of them in all ways. But thou, who art destined to end so soon, art thou wearied of enduring the bad, and this too when thou art one of them, too?"
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75809 From: Maxima Valeria Messallina Date: 2010-05-11
Subject: Re: CALL FOR ELECTIONS
The Tribunes have not forgotten and we are working on that. We will get to it as promptly as we can.
 
Maxima Valeria Messallina
Tribuna Plebis
 


--- On Mon, 5/10/10, Cato <catoinnyc@...> wrote:


From: Cato <catoinnyc@...>
Subject: [Nova-Roma] CALL FOR ELECTIONS
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Date: Monday, May 10, 2010, 4:04 PM


 



Cato omnibus in foro SPD

It is apparent that our government has forgotten that we are still without a colleague for the curule aedile. I formally request that the law regarding filling vacant magistracies be obeyed and elections held swiftly.

Valete,

Cato











[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75810 From: valeriuschlorus Date: 2010-05-11
Subject: A Virtual Rome (as Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: Temple of Cybele in Legal Tro
Chorus Vedio omnibusque sal.

I like the idea of a new kind of website, as I mentioned once in an earlier post.

V> "However, the goal of Nova
V> Roma has always been firmly planted in the real world; it is my V> belief"

I agree with this a 100%, and most of our efforts should be directed in achieving this. And though we try to reconstruct and live by the old ways, we should not ignore the power of these new ways of communication and spreading ideas.

V> "The Internet is, without a doubt, an extremely valuable tool for V> Nova
V> Roma. It allows us to exchange ideas, get our message out"

Indeed it is, and I think we can make it more powerful than it now is to reach more and a more diverse group people.
Make it more attractive and easier to use, so that also a younger generation can be inspired, but construct it so that the "older" generation can still use it with ease.

A new and better website, if constructed and used correctly, shouldn't have a negative effect on our real world goals in my humble opinion.
I think it could have a very positive effect, and that's the way it should be.

Are there chat rooms at the moment, as you mention in your post? would be nice, but I can't find them. I would love to chat with some fellow citizens.

Optime Valete!
M. Valerius Chlorus


--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Vedius <vedius@...> wrote:
>
> Salve,
>
> While I no longer function in any official capacity in our fair Res
> Publica, let me first welcome you, Gaius Lucretius Seneca, and thank you
> for your generous offer. I am sure that once the Senate comes up with an
> official RFQ, you and your partner will be in consideration.
>
> I would like to comment on your idea about a "virtual Rome", and how it
> might fit in with the idea of what Nova Roma is, at least as it was
> originally conceived.
>
> The Internet is, without a doubt, an extremely valuable tool for Nova
> Roma. It allows us to exchange ideas, get our message out, and attract
> new and enthusiastic cives such as yourself.
> that our efforts should be on physical shrines rather than virtual
> website shrines, real-world gatherings rather than online chats, and
> that we should aspire towards one day having a physical Forum that we
> can call our own. While chat rooms, web sites, and email lists are
> excellent tools to help fulfill those real-world goals, it should always
> be remembered that the virtual should never replace the physical. My
> fear would be that such a virtual Rome would edge towards doing exactly
> that.
>
> Naturally, many will disagree with me (and, indeed, I can mentally name
> a few that will come out of the gate swinging against this email, with
> all manner of things to say about me), but while I would welcome any
> enterprise that would bring us more together in the physical world, I'm
> not quite sure how a "virtual Rome" would do that, at least any more
> than our existing email lists, web sites, and chat rooms do. Perhaps I'm
> not understanding your proposal properly?
>
> Again, welcome, and please don't take my thoughts as any intentional
> dampening of your enthusiasm. But enthusiasm channeled in the right
> direction is infinitely more valuable, I believe, than enthusiasm
> pointing down a divergent road.
>
> Vale,
>
> Flavius Vedius Germanicus
> Pater Patriae
>
>
> Gaius Lucretius Seneca wrote:
> > On 5/9/2010 11:29 AM, C.Maria Caeca wrote:
> >
> >> 1. We need professional IT services, services extensive enough that we
> >> should be willing to pay for them. Using volunteers for most things is
> >> fine ...but the work involved in maintaining our web site is a major
> >> undertaking, and, when we use people who make their living in this
> >> field, not compensating them is unfair, if not exploitation.
> >>
> >>
> >
> > Salvete omnes! I am a new member of Nova Roma, having been granted
> > provisional citizenship a week ago. I've been meaning to say hello on
> > the list, which I've been following for several months and have noticed
> > several mentions of a need for website services - which happens to be my
> > area of expertise. My partner and I run a website hosting and design
> > company (http://telavant.com/) and so, though I'm new and unproven, I
> > thought I'd offer our services. We could host a server for the website
> > and I'm an expert-level PHP programmer.
> >
> > I also have some thoughts and ambitions toward someday building some
> > kind of interactive experience for Nova Romans - a "Virtual Rome" where
> > cives can meet online and chat. Would anyone be interested in having
> > such a thing, or helping to build it? This of course would be a
> > volunteer project. I'm thinking a text-based environment (like a MUD,
> > if any of you have played one of those) might be ideal.
> >
> > Optime valete!
> >
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------------
> >
> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75811 From: marcushoratius Date: 2010-05-12
Subject: a. d. IV Eidus Maiae: Mars Ultor; Moles of Mars
M. Moravius Piscinus cultores Deorum, Quiritibus et omnibus salutem plurimam dicit: Di vos servavissent semper.

Hodie est ante diem IV Eidus Maesiae; haec dies comitialis est: Ludi Marti.

AUC 734 / 19 BCE: Dedication of the Temple of Mars Ultor

AUC 751 / 2 BCE: Dedication of the Forum of Augustus

"Mars comes, giving the sign for war as he comes, the Avenger himself descends from the sky to view his shrine and honours in Augustus' forum. The God and the work are mighty: Mars could not be housed otherwise in his son's city." ~ Ovidius Naso, Fasti 5.

"On my own ground I built the Temple of Mars Ultor and the Augustan Forum from the spoils of war." ~ Caesar Augustus, Res Geste 21.1

This temple was vowed before the Battle of Philippi. Octavius called upon Mars Ultor to avenge the assassination of Julius Caesar in the war against the Republicans assassins. But it was not until much later that the temple was built and dedicated. The temple was located at the northeastern end of the Forum of Augustus. On its pediment, according to Zanker's iconographical scheme, Mars appeared with Venus and Romulus on His right side, with Fortuna and Roma on His left. Inside, the image of Mars Ultor had Venus at His right hand and divus Julius on His left. The Forum itself was flanked by two terraces where niches held statues of famous Romans, the viri summi. These were expanded upon by two hemicycles extending out on either side of the temple. To the left, on Mar's right hand were shown Aeneas, the Kings of Alba Longa, and the Iulii. In the eastern hemicycle stood Romulus, flanked by viri summi. At roughly the center of the Forum, on the main axis of Mars Ultor, was a statue of Augustus in the triumphal quadriga as Pater Patriae. Ludi Marti were instituted at the time this temple was dedicated.


Moles of Mars

At Cumae on this day was held a different celebration. Rather than Mars the Avenger, we hear of a festival for the Strength of Mars, or Mars Moles. Elsewhere Moles is distinguished as a distinct deity, as a companion of Mars, much as Pallor might be thought a distinct companion to Mars:

"Prayers to the immortal Gods, which are offered according to the Roman ritual, are set forth in the books of the priests of the Roman people, as well as in many ancient books of prayers. In these we find: Lua, of Saturnus; Salacia, of Neptunus; Hora, of Quirinus; the Virites of Quirinus; Maia of Vulcanus; Heries of Juno; Moles of Mars; and Nerio of Mars." ~ Aulus Gellius, Noctes Atticae 13.23.1-2

Lua is mentioned along with Mars and Minerva as a Goddess who receives spoila (Livy45.33.2). What Her connection would be with Saturnus is not exactly known, but She is presented here as wife to Saturnus in the same way as some of the other Goddesses appear. Lua is a Goddess of purification. Hersilia appears as the Sabine wife of Romulus; only later was she deified as Hora when Romulus was identified as Quirinus (Ovid, Metamorphoses 14.830-851). Nonius, however, said that Hora was a Goddess of Youth. Nerio is found as wife of Mars in a fragment from Licinius Imbrex and in a play by Plautus, as well as with Gellius (13.23.13). The names of these Goddesses came from Italic tribes. It is possible therefore that Moles was once a distinct deity of the Sabellians, whether a God of War as Mars might suggest, or as a God of Virility as the context above could suggest.


Garlands and Chaplets

"The ancients used chaplets of diminutive size, called "struppi" (woolen string or fillet); from which comes our name for a chaplet, "strophiolum." Indeed, it was only by very slow degrees that this last word became generalized, as the chaplets that were used at sacrifices, or were granted as the reward of military valour, asserted their exclusive right to the name of "corona." As for garlands, when they came to be made of flowers, they received the name of "serta," from the verb "sero" (to join together; bind) or else from our word "series." The use of flowers for garlands is not so very ancient, among the Greeks even.

"For in early times it was the usage to crown the victors in the sacred contests with branches of trees: and it was only at a later period, that they began to vary their tints by the combination of flowers, to heighten the effect in turn by their colour and their smell--an invention due to the ingenuity of the painter Pausias, at Sicyon, and the garland-maker Glyccra, a female to whom he was greatly attached, and whose handiwork was imitated by him in colours. Challenging him to a trial of skill, she would repeatedly vary her designs, and thus it was in reality a contest between art and Nature; a fact which we find attested by pictures of that artist even still in existence, more particularly the one known as the "Stephaneplocos," in which he has given a likeness of Glycera herself. This invention, therefore, is only to be traced to later than the Hundredth Olympiad (380 BCE).

"Chaplets of flowers being now the fashion, it was not long before those came into vogue which are known to us as Egyptian chaplets; and then the winter chaplets, made for the time at which Earth refuses her flowers, of thin laminæ of horn stained various colours. By slow degrees, too, the name was introduced at Rome, these garlands being known there at first as "corollæ," a designation given them to express the remarkable delicacy of their texture. In more recent times, again, when the chaplets presented were made of tinsel of copper, gilt or silvered, they assumed the name of corollaria." ~ C. Plinius Secundus, Historia Naturalis 21.2-3


Apollonius of Tyana

Since yesterday I mentioned the apparition of Apollonius of Tyana appearing to Aurelianus, I thought that today I might include something of his life.

"And they say that he declined to wear apparel made from dead animal products and, to guard his purity, abstained from all flesh diet, and from the offering of animals in sacrifice. For that he would not stain the altars with blood; nay, rather the honey-cake and frankincense and the hymn of praise, these they say were the offerings made to the Gods by this man, who realized that they welcome such tribute more than they do the hecatombs [100 oxen] and the knife laid upon the sacrificial basket. For they say that he had of a certainty social intercourse with the Gods, and learnt from Them the conditions under which They take pleasure in men or are disgusted, and on this intercourse he based his account of nature. For he said that, whereas other men only make conjectures about divinity and make guesses that contradict one another concerning it, in his own case he said that Apollo had come to him acknowledging that he was the God in person; and that Athena and the Muses and other Gods, whose forms and names men did not yet know, had also consorted with him though without making such acknowledgment. Â… And the story that he made at Olympia a bull of pastry and sacrificed it to the God also shows that he approved of the sentiments of Pythagoras." ~ Philostratus, Life of Apollonius of Tyana 1.1


Today's thought is from the Stoic Musonius, who taught Epictetus and won the latter his freedom. This fragment is from Gellius, Noctes Atticae 16.1.2:

"If you accomplish anything noble with toil, the toil passes but the noble deed endures. If you do anything shameful for pleasure, the pleasure passes but the shame endures forever."
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75812 From: Gaius Lucretius Seneca Date: 2010-05-12
Subject: Re: A Virtual Rome (as Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: Temple of Cybele in Legal
On 5/11/2010 10:00 AM, valeriuschlorus wrote:
>
> Chorus Vedio omnibusque sal.
>
> I like the idea of a new kind of website, as I mentioned once in an
> earlier post.
>
> V> "However, the goal of Nova
> V> Roma has always been firmly planted in the real world; it is my V>
> belief"
>
> I agree with this a 100%, and most of our efforts should be directed
> in achieving this. And though we try to reconstruct and live by the
> old ways, we should not ignore the power of these new ways of
> communication and spreading ideas.
>
> V> "The Internet is, without a doubt, an extremely valuable tool for
> V> Nova
> V> Roma. It allows us to exchange ideas, get our message out"
>
> Indeed it is, and I think we can make it more powerful than it now is
> to reach more and a more diverse group people.
> Make it more attractive and easier to use, so that also a younger
> generation can be inspired, but construct it so that the "older"
> generation can still use it with ease.
>

This was just the kind of feedback I was looking for, thanks :)

It's been suggested to me that a Facebook-style interface might be the
way to go, and I agree. I know I could definitely build something like
that - actually, I'm in the planning stages of building social
networking features into a client's intranet. So I might end up having
most of the code for this already written.

Thanks again everyone for such constructive feedback. I'm excited to be
here and eager to help!

Optime valete!
Seneca


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75813 From: titusaureliusilerges Date: 2010-05-12
Subject: (Ressurecting?) a Mithras Sodalites/Interest Group
Salvete Omnes:

There is any Mithras interest group in Nova Roma as of now? I'm aware there have been at least talks of creating a sodalites in the past, but as much as I look for it, I can't find any kind of Mithras worshipers around, I would be very grateful if anybody can offer me some advice on this topic

Curate, ut valeatis

Titus Aurelius Ilerges
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75814 From: rory12001 Date: 2010-05-13
Subject: Re: (Ressurecting?) a Mithras Sodalites/Interest Group
M. Hortensia T. Aurelio spd;
I know M. Cornelius Gualterus Graecus is very knowledgable about Mithras and wanted to form a collegia. Nabarz, is a devoted Mithraist.

I suggest you cross post to the Religio Romana list as there are many subscribed there & there are a number of Mithra posts, if you use the search engine.
optime vale
Maior

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "titusaureliusilerges" <titusaureliusilerges@...> wrote:
>
> Salvete Omnes:
>
> There is any Mithras interest group in Nova Roma as of now? I'm aware there have been at least talks of creating a sodalites in the past, but as much as I look for it, I can't find any kind of Mithras worshipers around, I would be very grateful if anybody can offer me some advice on this topic
>
> Curate, ut valeatis
>
> Titus Aurelius Ilerges
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75815 From: Cn. Cornelius Lentulus Date: 2010-05-13
Subject: R: [Nova-Roma] (Ressurecting?) a Mithras Sodalites/Interest Group
Cn. Lentulus pontifex T. Aurelio sal.

That's very honourable from you that you want to help the growth of Nova Roma. All should follow your example. Like the praetrix and Flamen Hortensia suggested, contact M. Cornelius Gualterus who is an expert on Mithraism, and also, contact the Sacerdos Mithrae, Sibylla Ambrosia Flavia. Together, you three, could work on a project of creating a Nova Roman Mithraic Sodalitas.

Vale.


--- Gio 13/5/10, titusaureliusilerges <titusaureliusilerges@...> ha scritto:

Da: titusaureliusilerges <titusaureliusilerges@...>
Oggetto: [Nova-Roma] (Ressurecting?) a Mithras Sodalites/Interest Group
A: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Data: Giovedì 13 maggio 2010, 00:12







 









Salvete Omnes:



There is any Mithras interest group in Nova Roma as of now? I'm aware there have been at least talks of creating a sodalites in the past, but as much as I look for it, I can't find any kind of Mithras worshipers around, I would be very grateful if anybody can offer me some advice on this topic



Curate, ut valeatis



Titus Aurelius Ilerges

























[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75816 From: Cn. Cornelius Lentulus Date: 2010-05-13
Subject: Re: A Virtual Rome (as Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: Temple of Cybele in Legal
Cn. Lentulus magister aranearius et pontifex C. Lucretio sal.


Wonderful, Gai Lucreti! As official website content manager of Nova Roma, magister aranearius, I contact you privately about the details in what you can help!


VALE!



--- Mer 12/5/10, Gaius Lucretius Seneca <c.lucretius.seneca@...> ha scritto:

Da: Gaius Lucretius Seneca <c.lucretius.seneca@...>
Oggetto: Re: A Virtual Rome (as Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: Temple of Cybele in Legal Trouble)
A: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Data: Mercoledì 12 maggio 2010, 23:49



It's been suggested to me that a Facebook-style interface might be the

way to go, and I agree. I know I could definitely build something like

that - actually, I'm in the planning stages of building social

networking features into a client's intranet. So I might end up having

most of the code for this already written.



Thanks again everyone for such constructive feedback. I'm excited to be

here and eager to help!



Optime valete!

Seneca



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

























[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75817 From: marcushoratius Date: 2010-05-13
Subject: a. d. III Eidus Maiae: LEMURIA
M. Moravius Piscinus cultores Deorum, Quiritibus et omnibus salutem plurimam dicit: Di Deaeque vos ament.

Hodie est ante diem III Eidus Maiae; haec dies nefastus est: LEMURIA; Rosaria; Fidis mane oritur, significat tempestatem.

Lemuria

For the third time, in the hours between Midnight and Dawn, this morning with a pinch of sulfur added to the incense, beans offered over the left shoulder, and bronze clashing, are the Lemures expiated from your house. The boundaries set once more, now is the time to restore your home with your family, beginning with your Lares.

At Capua a Rosaria was held in the amphitheatre (CIL 10, 3792). The name suggests that this was a public festival to honor the Lares. In Rome the day might have been marked with rites performed at family tombs, picnicking with the ancestors. Otherwise, at home, bringing the images of your family Lares to the supper table for a family feast; fragrant incense inviting the Lares to enjoy their now purified home; a feast welcoming them to remain a part of your family; this day is marked by a thanksgiving to your Lares.

"Lares preserve! While young and still nursing, you guided me when I played at your feet. Let none profane your antique images: rough-hewn wooden statues set upon altars of upturned sod then dwelled among our grandfathers. In those days humble reverence provided you with sweet honey alone, you stayed in meager shrines made of twigs, in tattered robes the gods were pleased with offerings of grapes and wreathes of wheat set upon carved heads. Granted his wish, a man would bring you honey cakes and set his virgin daughters to attend your little shrines." ~ A. Tibullus 1.10.15-24

The ancestors were called to protect, preserve, and advise the family as elders of the family. We find expression of this idea through the centuries, beginning with Ennius who lived from 239 to 170 BCE.

"And you Lares, care for our house that you established." ~ Q. Ennius, Annales 1 fr. 141

Tibullus was still a young man at the time Augustus defeated Marcus Antonius at Actium; he was born in 50 BCE and died about twenty years later in 19 BCE.

"Lares, and you gods also, who earlier made our household fruitful and fortunate, may you guard and bless the little that remains today on our farm. Lares, accept what your kindred present to you." ~ A. Tibullus 1.1.19-24

Gaius Valerius Flaccus came almost a century later. He died shortly before 90 CE.

"Holy Father, give me the strength and courage to try to do you credit so that I may teach my children those lessons you once taught to me." ~ C. Valerius Flaccus Argonautica 6.288-91

It is, of course, on tombstones that we would most often find expressions about and towards the dead. The formulaic D. M. that begins most funerary inscriptions means "to the Di Manes" and it signfies a sacrifice offered to the Manes on behalf of the deceased that they might accept him among them and guide him to his destination in the afterlife in order that he might in turn become a Lar to guide his family. This idea is best expressed by a woman for her husband, and also on behalf of her own afterlife, probably in the second century CE:

"Whole-heartedly I pray to you, most holy Manes, may you admit my dear husband among you, and, may you want to be most indulging in this, that in the hours of the night I may see him and also be advised by him on what to do, in order that I may be able to swiftly and sweetly come stand by his side." ~ CIL 6.18817

Expressions like this are found from nearly the earliest period of Rome's written records, well into the fifteh century. So how does one make offerings to one's Lares, as opposed to the Lemures? Lares are ancestores, family members, so it is a simple matter of sharing your food and drink, and mostly your laughter with them. And at the end of the day an offering of olive oil is made by lighting a lamp for them at their tombs.


Our thought for today is from L. Annaeus Seneca minor, De Consolatione ad Marciam 9.4:

"Snatch the pleasures your children bring, let your children in turn find delight in you, and drain joy to the dregs without delay."
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75818 From: Christer Edling Date: 2010-05-13
Subject: Re: CALL FOR ELECTIONS
Salve Senator!

The Consuls have not forgotten it, but as You know it all hangs on one
person and it isn't easy any longer for him to find time to deal with
this.

Still the Senate has taken the necessary steps to get the IT-system
fixed so that we can deal with elections and other things without
needing to have anyone to "manipulate" the scripts.

********

11 maj 2010 kl. 01.04 skrev Cato:

Cato omnibus in foro SPD

It is apparent that our government has forgotten that we are still
without a colleague for the curule aedile. I formally request that
the law regarding filling vacant magistracies be obeyed and elections
held swiftly.

Valete,

Cato




*****************
Vale

Caeso Fabius Buteo Quintilianus

Consul Iterum
Princeps Senatus et Flamen Palatualis
Civis Romanus sum
http://www.novaroma.org/nr/Main_Page
************************************************
Aut inveniam viam aut faciam
"I'll either find a way or make one"
************************************************
Dignitas, Iustitia, Fidelitas et Pietas
Dignity, Justice, Loyalty and Dutifulness
************************************************
Mons Palatinus, Clivus Victoriae
Palatine Hill, Incline of Victoriae
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75819 From: Maxima Valeria Messallina Date: 2010-05-13
Subject: Test
This is just a test post.

Thank you.


MVM


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75820 From: fauxrari Date: 2010-05-13
Subject: Re: (Ressurecting?) a Mithras Sodalites/Interest Group
Salve Maior,
Could you possibly post a link to this group? I didn't know such a thing exionsted!

Gratias,

L. Antonia Auriga

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "rory12001" <rory12001@...> wrote:
>
> M. Hortensia T. Aurelio spd;
> I know M. Cornelius Gualterus Graecus is very knowledgable about Mithras and wanted to form a collegia. Nabarz, is a devoted Mithraist.
>
> I suggest you cross post to the Religio Romana list as there are many subscribed there & there are a number of Mithra posts, if you use the search engine.
> optime vale
> Maior
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "titusaureliusilerges" <titusaureliusilerges@> wrote:
> >
> > Salvete Omnes:
> >
> > There is any Mithras interest group in Nova Roma as of now? I'm aware there have been at least talks of creating a sodalites in the past, but as much as I look for it, I can't find any kind of Mithras worshipers around, I would be very grateful if anybody can offer me some advice on this topic
> >
> > Curate, ut valeatis
> >
> > Titus Aurelius Ilerges
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75821 From: Titus aurelius Ilerges Date: 2010-05-13
Subject: Re: R: [Nova-Roma] (Ressurecting?) a Mithras Sodalites/Interest Grou
Salve Cn. Cornelius Lentulus:

I shall contact M. Cornelius Gualterus and Sibylla Ambrosia Flavia as soon as possible and see what can be done about a Mithras Sodalites, I've still got plenty of doubts and questions and hope everyone who wishes will collaborate in this project. I'm really gratiful to both you and to Flamen Hortensia for your gentle advice. Please forgive my uncompetent use of the latin protocol, I'm still learning it.

Curate et Valeatis

T. Aurelius Ilerges



 



________________________________
From: Cn. Cornelius Lentulus <cn_corn_lent@...>
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thu, May 13, 2010 8:36:31 AM
Subject: R: [Nova-Roma] (Ressurecting?) a Mithras Sodalites/Interest Group

 

Cn. Lentulus pontifex T. Aurelio sal.

That's very honourable from you that you want to help the growth of Nova Roma. All should follow your example. Like the praetrix and Flamen Hortensia suggested, contact M. Cornelius Gualterus who is an expert on Mithraism, and also, contact the Sacerdos Mithrae, Sibylla Ambrosia Flavia. Together, you three, could work on a project of creating a Nova Roman Mithraic Sodalitas.

Vale.

--- Gio 13/5/10, titusaureliusilerges <titusaureliusilerges@...> ha scritto:

Da: titusaureliusilerges <titusaureliusilerges@...>
Oggetto: [Nova-Roma] (Ressurecting?) a Mithras Sodalites/Interest Group
A: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Data: Giovedì 13 maggio 2010, 00:12

 

Salvete Omnes:

There is any Mithras interest group in Nova Roma as of now? I'm aware there have been at least talks of creating a sodalites in the past, but as much as I look for it, I can't find any kind of Mithras worshipers around, I would be very grateful if anybody can offer me some advice on this topic

Curate, ut valeatis

Titus Aurelius Ilerges

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]







[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75822 From: marcushoratius Date: 2010-05-14
Subject: Pridie Eidus Maiae: The Argei
M. Moravius Piscinus cultoribus Deorum et omnibus salutem plurimam dicit: Dei vos annuant oro.

Hodie est die pristine Eidus Maiae; haec dies comitialis est: sacra Argeorum

"On this day too, the Vestals throw effigies made of rushes, in the form of men of old, from the oak bridge." ~ Ovidius Naso, Fasti 5.621

"Why is it that in the month of May at the time of the full moon they throw into the river from the Pons Sublicius figures of men, calling the images thrown Argives? Is it because in ancient days the barbarians wholived in these parts used to destroy thus the Greeks whom they captured? But Hercules, who was much admired by them, put an end to their murder of strangers and taught them to throw figures into the river, in imitation of their superstitious custom, The men of old used to call all Greeks Argives; unless it be, indeed, since the Arcadians regarded the Argives also as their enemies because of their immediate proximity, that, when Evander and his men fled Greece and settled here, they continued to preserve their ancient feud and enmity." ~ Plutarch, Roman Questions 32

On March 16 and 17 a procession was conducted throughout the City to the various sacella of the Argei. Varro said that there were twenty-seven sacella, of which he gives the location for several though not all, divided among the four divisions of the Servian City( Lingua Latinae 5.45-54). At each a puppet made of rushes was deposited. Next, on 14 May these rush puppets were taken from their sacella and brought to the Pons Sublicius from which they were thrown into the Tiber, or otherwise submerged into the water. Present at this ritual were magistrates, in particular the praetor urbanus, the pontifices, Vestales Virgines, the flamenica Dialis, and a class of priests called tutulati. Of the latter, Varro explains:

"The Argei are made of rushes, human figures twenty-seven in number; each year these are thrown into the Tiber from the Pons Sublicius by the sacerdotes, acting on behalf of the public. These priests are called tutulati since at the sacrifice they are accustomed to have something like a conical marker on their heads; this is called a tutulus from the fact that the twisted locks of hair which the matrons wear on the tops of their heads wrapped with a woolen band, used to be called tutuli, whether named from the fact that this was done for the purpose of protecting (tueri) the hair, or because that which is the highest in the City, namely the Arx, was called tutissimum (the safest)." ~ M. Terrentius Varro, Lingua Latinae 7.44

"It is said also that the ancients sacrificed human victims to Saturn, as was done at Carthage while that city stood and as is there is done to this day among the Gauls and certain other western nations, and that Hercules, desiring to abolish the custom of this sacrifice, erected the altar upon the Saturnian hill and performed the initial rites of sacrifice with unblemished victims burning on a pure fire. And lest the people should feel any scruple at having neglected their traditional sacrifices, he taught them to appease the anger of the God by making effigies resembling the men they had been wont to bind hand and foot and throw into the stream of the Tiber, and dressing these in the same manner, to throw them into the river instead of the men, his purpose being that any superstitious dread remaining in the minds of all might be removed, since the semblance of the ancient rite would still be preserved. This the Romans continued to do every year even down to my day a little after the vernal equinox, in the month of May, on what they call the Ides (the day they mean to be the middle of the month); on this day, after offering the preliminary sacrifices according to the laws, the pontifices, as the most important of the priests are called, and with p125them the virgins who guard the perpetual fire, the praetors, and such of the other citizens as may lawfully be present at the rites, throw from the sacred bridge into the stream of the Tiber thirty effigies made in the likeness of men, which they call Argei." ~ Dionysius of Halicarnassus, Roman Antiquities, 1.38.2-3

Different stories were told to explain this rite, projecting it back into a time before Rome. In one story, Hercules teaches the aboriginal people of the seven hills to use men made of rushes as substitutes for human sacrifices. In another it was said that young men use to throw old men from the bridge when passing over to vote in comitia. The rite was then thought to have been made to placate the murdered old men. There is very little evidence that human sacrifices were practiced at Rome, and what there is comes from a later period than the legends suggests. That is, Livy tells us of two instances during the era of the Punic Wars where two couples in each instance, one of Greeks and one of Etruscans, were sacrificed. Also Carandini has discovered the remains of four individuals that appear to have been sacrificed in a rite related to Remus at a time when the poemerium was extended. The Romans themselves speculated that such a use puppets as found with the argei, and also the oscilla hung in trees at the feriae Latinae and the Paganalia, had been substituted for an earlier practice of human sacrifice. There is no evidence in any remains ever found at such places that such was true; whereas the puppets would seem more likely to correspond to bronze votives of human and animal forms as have been found in favissa on the Capitoline Hill, in Sabine territories and elsewhere. Something like the paintings found in Val Camonica, dating from the Bronze Age and into the early Iron Age, the votives represent participants in the rites rather than any sacrificial victims.

Another story told is that the Argei represent those Greek heroes who travelled with Hercules to Italy and settled at Rome. When in old age and nearing death they requested that they be returned by sea to their native land, and thus the puppets represent sending their souls down river, to the open sea, where they might be carried to their fatherland. This story, too, is a later invention and lends no real explanation for the ritual.

Working from such ideas Wissowa proposed that the rite was introduced by the decemviri sacris faciundis in response to a pestilence that occurred between the first and second Punic Wars. In his theory, twenty-seven (or twenty-four, or thirty after Dionysius of Halicarnassus) Greeks were taken to different stations in the City, and held for a while before being sacrificed by drowning. Wissowa's ideas have been refuted for the same reasons as disputes the Romans own speculations, but also because the decemviri did not participate in this rite, and no mention is made of the Sibylline Oracles in relation to the Argei. Nevertheless there may be some merit to his ideas on when this rite was introduced. It does not appear in any calendar, and does not appear to have been one of the early state rites. Thus it would seem to have originated sometime after the fourth century, and the Greek elements in legends about the rite's origin may suggest an introduction as late as the mid second century.

The origin and purpose of the ritual is uncertain among our sources. The presence of the Vestales along with the pontifices, and the fact that a procession was conducted from the various sacalla to the Tiber suggest that this was a purification ritual. Another feature is seen with the flamenica Dialis.

"When she goes to the Argei, that she neither combs her head nor dresses her hair." ~ Aulus Gellius, Noctes Atticae 10.15.30

In other words, she presents herself in public as though she is in mourning. On two other occasions she is seen in the same manner; when the Salii perform a purification of the City in March and when the Vestales perform a purification of the Temple of Vesta in June. There is another rite with something similar. The lapis manalis, a large stone that sounded like thunder when rolled through Rome, was brought from the Campus Martius to the Capitolium. This was a rite of sympathetic magic to induce Jupiter to send rain. The rite of the argei is a dramatic performance rather than a sacrifice. So it shares in something common with the ritual where the lapis manalis is brought out. Also in Ptolemaic Egyptwhere images of Adonis were immersed in the Nile amid a weeping crowd in a ritual to secure the flooding of the river and fertility of the land. Tacitus describes how images of the Germanic Goddess Nerthus was immersed in rivers for a similar reason (Germania 40). Other examples of such rites among Teutonic, Slavonic, and Greek traditions are cited by W. W. Fowler as parallels. Behind the legends, and some modern assumptions as well, the ritual of immersing the rush puppets into the Tiber has features that show it, too, is a rite involving sympathetic magic, a purification of the City, in order to secure rain and fertility.

"The magic elements in the rite are clear: The straw puppets, made to look like men, were as good as men themselves in a magic rite, whether or not the rite originated in human sacrifice. Again, if the straw represented the products of the earth, `the corn spirit,' as it has been called, these puppets, when drenched in water, were sufficient to cause the rain to fall, just as the lapis manalis, when drenched with water, could cause the heavens to overflow. Further, this view is strengthened by the prominent part taken in the rite by the Vestals, who, in all their public religious duties, were concerned with rites to produce fertility in crops and flocks and who, as we know, were possessed of magic powers. The procession itself involved purification – a magic rite itself – as was the case with all Roman processions." ~ Eli Edward Burriss, The Classical Journal, Vol. 24, No. 2 (Nov., 1928), pp. 112-123.


Today's thought is from Seneca, On Tranquility 10:

"We are all chained to Fortune. Some chains are golden and loose, some are tight and made of base metal; but what difference does it make? All of us are in custody, the binders and the bound – unless you suppose the left end of the chain is lighter. Some are chained by office, some by wealth; some are weighed down by high birth, some by low; some are subject to another's tyranny, some to their own; some ar confined to one spot by banishment, some by a priesthood. All life is bondage. Man musttherefore habituate himselfto his condition, complain of it as little as possible, and grasp whatever good lies within his reach. No situation is so harsh that a dispassionate mind cannot find some consolation in it."
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75823 From: marcushoratius Date: 2010-05-14
Subject: Responsum augurum de tripudio consularis
Ex domo Auguris

M. Moravius Piscinus Magister Collegii Augurum P. Memmio et K. Fabio Butone Consulibus: salutem plurimam dicit.

Responsum augurum de tribudio consularis

Having weighed the laws of Nova Roma and the ars augurium on the matter of the dispute between Consul P. Memmius Albucius and myself in regard to the auspices taken for the rogation held in the Comitia Centuria last April, it is my considered opinion that:

First, the Constitution VI.B.1assigns the Collegium Pontificum with "responsibilities within the Religio Romana"alone, and limits its responsibilities to "the public Religio Romana." In all of the specific responsibilites of the Collegium Pontificum and with its "general authority over the institutions, rites, rituals, and priesthoods of the public Religio Romana" as well as over the religious calendar, it is clear that the constitutional limitation on the authority of the Collegium Pontificum are the sacra publica alone. Its power of issuing decreta is likewise limited to the sphere of the public Religio Romana with regard to the sacra publica alone. The Constitution VI.B.2 is still more clear on the sphere of responsibilities of the Collegium Augurum with regard to the ars auguria. The Collegium Pontificum has no constitutional authority to issue decreta concerning any aspect of the ars augurum, and the Collegium Augurum has no constitutional authority to issue decreta concerning any sacra publica performed by the Collegium Pontificum, except with regard to declaring the inauspiciousness of that vitia as may occur during the sacra publica. Further, there is no authority under the Constitution for the Collegium Pontificum and the Collegium Augurum to have held a joint session. Indeed, with the completely distinct areas of responsibility and authority, it is clear that, in the absence of any authorization to hold joint sessions of the Collegia, the Constitution prohibits joint sessions of the two Collegia.

Therefore I must conslude that the the Decretum Collegii Pontificum et Augurum de iure auspicando et tripudio, issued a.d. IV Non. Dec. K. Fabio T. Labieno ccos.in anno MMDCCLVI, and the corresponding decreta issued under it, were unconstitutional as were so many other decreta issued by the Collegium Pontificum in that time period of Nova Roma's history. Therefore the provisions of those decreta must be regarded as unconstitutional, voided, and without any effect. It is solely the responsibility of the Collegium Augurum to issue decreta concerning auspicium and tripudium and they shall now have to issue decreta to replace the earlier and unconstitutional decreta in question..


Secondly, a question arose as to whether those who are granted imperium by the Comitia Curiata have an implicit power of auspicium. They do not. It is very clear that imperium and auspicium were always regarded as separate powers. The curiata passed seperate leges de imperia and leges de auspicia. One example of the distinction made in Roma antiqua is with the Scholia Veron. Aen. 10.241, which is our only description of a tripudium. There the phrase "quem imperium auspiciumque erat" is used. Roberta Stewart address this distinction in Public Office in Early Rome: Ritual Procedures & Political Practice. At p. 22 she says:

"Political power at Rome was made efficient by its diffusion. Popular election
annually conferred title of office to multiples of public officials of equal
rank, what Mommsen called collegiality. A subsequent vote of the curiae
ratified the general authority of office bestowed by election, the right to
issue orders to an army (imperium), and the right to seek auspices, or bird
signs, from Jupiter before undertaking any public business (auspicium)."

And again at p. 95, she writes:

"we observed a three-step procedure for investiture among military tribunes with
consular power: an election conferred title of office among multiples of
officials of equal rank; a curiate law affirmed imperium and auspicium; the
absolute powers of curule office and the allotment of particular assignments in
pairs of colleagues established internal control on the authority of
colleagues."

With regard to the tribunes with consular powers of which R. Stewart speaks, they held imperium so that they could command armies, but they did not hold auspicium by which to hold elections. The imperium and the auspicium of praetores were less than those of consules, and thus a praetor could not hold an election for a consul (Cicero, ad Att.
9.9.3). Valerius Messalla distinguished between maiores magistrates elected in the centuriata under major auspicium and the minores magistrates elected in the tributa under lesser auspicium (Gell. Noct. Att. 13.15.4). Only those elected under the major auspices could be installed with imperium by the curiae. Lesser magistrates held a kind of quasi-auspicium commensable with their offices since auspices were taken before doing any public business. But they did not hold the higher ius auspicandi that a consul held, whereby he had the right to represent the respublica when calling upon Jupiter.

This distinction is quite important, especially in how it is found in our own Constitution. .The Constitution III.A.1 empowers the Comitia Curiata "To invest elected and appointed magistrates with Imperium," and says nothing about auspicium. Likewise the Constitution IV.A2a; 3.a; and 4.a invests curule magistrates with imperium, but says nothing about a power of auspicium. Leges that follow the Constitution, such as the Lex Arminia Equitia de imperio, try to define the rights of magistrates as granted by their holding imperium and also speak of the potentes of magistrates and tribuni plebis. But no where in any Nova Roma law are magistrates given the power, right, or honor of auspicium.

On the other hand, the Constitution VI.B.2 explicitly invests the Collegium Augurum collectively and augures individually with all "honors, powers and responsibilities" over the ars auguria and its application in Nova Roma. Augures alone have the constitutional power to delay a meeting of a comitia or the Senate by declaring an obnuntio (VI.B.2.b.2). Implicitly, if individual augures have a power to declare obnuntiones, they must have the power of auspicium because only with auspicium would they have authority to call upon Jupiter Optimus Maximus to provide signs during an auspication, while without auspicium one is not authorized to conduct a public auspication.

Therefore curule magistrates who hold imperium in Nova Roma do not hold auspicium. And therefore also, the Collegium Augurium alone has constitutional authority to grant usufruct rights to auspicium and no magistrate or comitia may usurp that power from the Collegium Augurum.


Thirdly, the Lex Fabia de Ratione Comitiorum Centuriatorum that governs rogations held in the comita states at 3.B.2 that during the contio "A member of the Collegium Augurum shall be invited by the presiding magistrate to seek favorable auspices for the conduct of the vote, subject to those rules and regulations the Collegium Augurum shall set forth by decreta. Should the presiding magistrate himself be a member of the Collegium Augurum, he may take the auspices for the vote himself."

The fact is that Consul P. Memmius did request a member of the Collegium Augurum to take auspices for his convening of the Comitia Centuriata. He was informed that my own three attempts to find favorable auspices had failed, that unusual and ill-omened signs were seen instead. As Magister Collegii Augurum, I advised the Consul that I should wait and take the auspices again when it might be a better time. Specifically, the Consul had requested that I take auspices for convening both the Senate and the Comitia Centuriat, and I suggested that since my attempts at this had failed that we should hold separate auspices for the Senate and later for the comitia. He agreed. I took the auspices for the Senate session, which, although not favorable, they did not prohibt the Senate from convening either. The Consul held the session on his own discretion.

The call for the Comitia Centuriata to assemble, issued by Consul P. Memmius stated that favorable signs had been obtained. Certainly not by me. Nor had my colleague taken the auspices, and therefore had not seen favorable signs. The Consul apparently never took the auspices either, as he was later to claim. However, the Lex Fabia de ratione does not require that favorable auspices are received before a comitia is assembled; only that favourable auspices be sought. It is left to a consul's discretion, by virtue of his imperium, whether or not to proceed with a comitia in spite of having received unfavorable auspices. The stunning results of the rogationes, with all of the Consul's proposed legislation failing, is a clear example of what happens when a magistrate ignores the will of the Gods as expressed through the auspices. Ne istuc Iuppiter opiimus maximus sirit. Male te Di faciant, qui profane et impie sis. But in this, there was nothing in the Consul's actions that did not comply with the letter of Nova Roman laws and therefore his actions were legal, if enteriely unprecedent in his disregard of the auspices by a Nova Roma consul.

Therefore I shall merely pass on to the Consul and to all magistrates the advice offered by Titus Livius (5.51.5-6): Invenietis omnia prospera evenisse sequentibus Deos, adversa spernentibus. "You discover that all events turn out well when we follow the Gods in obedience, and ill when we spurn Them."


Lastly then, there is a seemingly contradictory assignment of precedence in the Constitution. Whereon the one hand legal precedence at I.B has: "This Constitution shall be the highest legal authority within Nova Roma" and has in descending order the "legal authority by edicta issued by consuls acting under the Senatus consulta ultima, laws properly voted and passed by one of the comitia, decreta passed by the collegium pontificum, decreta passed by the collegium augurum, Senatus consulta, and magisterial edicta," While on the other hand VI.B.1.c and VI.B.2.a.2 hold that decreta issued by the Collegium Pontificum or the Collegium Augurum "may not be overruled by laws passed in the comitia or Senatus consultum." These seemingly contradicting provisions are instead exclusionary of one another. It is clear in section VI that the intent is that decreta that had previously been issued by the Collegia may not be overturned later by leges or senatusconsulta. However, the Constitution is also clear that the Collegia may not issue any decreta that would overrule a pre-existing lex as it would then violate section I.B. It is therefore equally clear that were either a comitia to pass a lex to overrule a decretum of one of the Collegia, or a Collegium to issue a decretum that overruled a lex passed by a comitia, then the Tribuni Plebis must strike it down as unconstitutional.

The Lex Fabia de ratione comitiorum centuriatorum was passed on 8 Oct. 2003. Its requirement that favourable auspices be sought prior to an assembly of the Comitia Centuriata refers to the ars auguria under the Collegium Augurum, and this takes precedence over any augural decretum that would be issued at a later date. It should be noted that the Decretum Collegii Pontificum et Augurum de iure auspicando et tripudio, had it been constitutional, would fall into this category of a decretum issued after the lex since it was issued on 2 Dec. 2003. However section 3.B.2 of the Lex Fabia states that the taking of the auspices shall be "subject to those rules and regulations theCollegium Augurum shall set forth by decreta". Clearly the Lex Fabia addressed the possibility that later decreta would be issued by the Collegium Augurum and would hold legal precedence in matters concerned with the ars auguria.

Therefore even though the Lex Fabia de ratione comitiorum centuriatorum would normally have legal precedence under the Constitution I.B over any decreta that would follow after it, this lex itself deferrs legal precedence to later decreta of the Collegium Augurum that deal with auspices in relation to the Comitia Centuriata. The Decretum Collegii Pontificum et Augurum de iure auspicando et tripudio may be void by virtue of its being unconstitutional, but it is still left to the Collegium Augurum under the Constitution and under the Lex Fabia to issue an instructive decretum in this regard.


Therefore, from the above considerations ,one must conclude the following:

1. In any question over legal precedence between leges and decreta, the main initial consideration is which had preceeded the other. Leges passed by comitia may not nullify pre-existing decreta of a sacerdotal collegium, and decreta may not set conditions that would, in effect, nullify a pre-existing lex.
2. The Lex Arminia Equitia de imperio grants curule magistrates the power to interpret the law when there are discrepencies in the law and/or seemingly contraditory provisions in the law.
3. Although curule magistrates of Nova Roma hold imperium, they do not hold a power of auspicium.
4. The Collegium Augurum alone has constitutional authority over the auspices in regard to how they are to be taken, who shall be authorized to take auspices, how this authorization is granted if extended from the constitutional authority of the Collegium Augurum, when auspices may be taken and when, and every other aspect of the ars auguria and of templa erected under the authority of augures.
5. Under the Constitution VI.B.2.b.2 individual augures alone may declare obnuntiones, which was further recognized in the Lex Fabia de ratione comitiorum centuriatorum section 3.B.1.2 on timing of the vote in comita, and therefore, implicitly, it must hold that only the public augures possess a constitutional power of auspicium.
6. The imperium of a magistrate does not allow him or her to deviate in any way from the instructions provided by augures in regard to the ars auguria. The imperium of a curule magistrate does, however, allow him or her to ignore the advice provided by the auspices, as Appius Claudius famously did, but a magistrate who does so risks breaking fides with the Gods and thus could also jeapordize the pax Deorum of the Res Publica Populi Novi Romani, leading to a disaster for Nova Roma as occurred to the fleet of Appius Clauidus and to the army of Flaminius at Lake Trasimene.

Nova Roma, its Citizens and its Magistrates need to reflect more deeply on the statement of Valerius Maximus (2.1.1), "Among our ancestors nothing was done either publicly or privately without first consulting the auspices." It had been unprecedented before for any consul of Nova Roma to either ignore or forego the auspices as Consul P. Memmius appears to have done. It has cost him personally and politically. May the Gods understand and not allow the neglect of one man to reflect upon the future of Nova Roma.


Ab manu pridie Idus Maiae ab Urbe condita MMDCCLXIII P. Memmio K. Fabio Buteone cos.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75824 From: Cato Date: 2010-05-14
Subject: Re: Responsum augurum de tripudio consularis
Cato Piscino sal.

Mixed in among a large number of things is this curious statement:

"1. In any question over legal precedence between leges and decreta, the main initial consideration is which had preceeded the other. Leges passed by comitia may not nullify pre-existing decreta of a sacerdotal collegium, and decreta may not set conditions that would, in effect, nullify a pre-existing lex."

This is not true. The Constitution clearly states the order of legal precedence:

"This Constitution shall be the highest legal authority within Nova Roma, apart from edicts issued by a legally appointed dictator. It shall thereafter be followed in legal authority by edicta issued by consuls acting under the Senatus consulta ultima, laws properly voted and passed by one of the comitia, decreta passed by the collegium pontificum, decreta passed by the collegium augurum, Senatus consulta, and magisterial edicta (in order of descending authority as described in section IV of this Constitution), in that order."

No lex or edictum or decretum can override the Constitution's enumeration of legal precedence, so a law passed in comitia does, in fact, nullify a decretum. The Constitution does not allow for us to impose restrictions on its language regarding when a decretum or lex was passed, only that a lex overrides a decretum.

There is not even a question of a decretum having any effect on a lex.

Vale,

Cato
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75825 From: Maxima Valeria Messallina Date: 2010-05-14
Subject: Results of the Senate Meeting of April 2763 auc.
Tribunae Plebis Maximae Valeriae Messallinae Quiritibus S.P.D. 
 
Citizens of Nova Roma,
 
Here is the Tribunician report of the Senate session of April 24 to May 7, 2763. The votes have been tallied and the results are as follows: 

 
The Senate was called into session at 6:00 hours, Rome time (12:00 a.m. EDT) on a.d. VIII Kal. Mai., Saturday, April 24, 2763 auc. and discussions continued until 24:00 hours, Rome time (6:00 p.m. EDT). A recess was called due to April 25th being Robigalia and dies nefastus publicus. Discussions were resumed at 6:00 hours, Rome time (12:00 a.m. EDT) on a.d. VI Kal. Mai., Monday, April 26, 2763 and continued until 24.00 hours, Rome time (6:00 p.m. EDT), pr. Kal. Mai., Friday, April 30th. A second recess was called due to May 1st being Floralia and May 2nd being dies ateri. 

Voting on the Agenda began at 6:00 hours, Rome time (12:00 a.m. EDT) on a.d. V Non. Mai., Monday, May 3, 2763 and concluded at 18:00 hours, Rome time, (12:00 p.m. EDT) on Non. Mai., Friday, May 7, 2763 auc.

 
The following XX Senators cast their votes on time. They are referred to by their initials which are listed in alphabetical order (with the exception of the presiding magistrate who will be listed first): 
 

*KFBQ: K. Fabius Buteo Quintilianus – Presiding Magistrate
 
*ATS: A. Tullia Scholastica
*CCS: C. Curius Saturninus
*CFD: C. Flavius Diocletianus
*CnEM: Cn. Equitius Marinus
*CnIC: Cn. Iulius Caesar
*EqIL: Equestria Iunia Laeca
*KFBM: K. Fabius Buteo Modianus
*MAM: M. Arminius Maior
*MHM: M. Hortensia Maior
*MIP: M. Iulius Perusianus
*MLA: M. Lucretius Agricola
*MMA M. Minucius Audens
*MMPH: M. Moravius Piscinus Horatianus  
*PMA: P. Memmius Albucius 
*QFM: Q. Fabius Maximus
*QSP: Q. Suetonius Paulinus
*TiGPTi.: Ti. Galerius Paulinus
*TIS: T. Iulius Sabinus 


One Senator voted by proxy:
*LCSF: L. Cornelius Sulla Felix (Proxy vote delivered by Cn. Iulius Caesar)

 
One Senator's vote arrived too late:
*CEC: C. Equitius Cato 
 
The following Senatores (XI) did not vote:
*ArnMA: Arn. Moravia Aurelia
*CMM: C. Marius Merullus
*CVP: C. Vipsanius Agrippa
*DIPI: Dec. Iunius Palladius Invictus
*EmCF: Em. Curia Finnica
*FAC: Fr. Apulus Caesar
*FGA: Fl. Galerius Aurelianus 
*MCC: M. Curiatius Complutensis
*MIS: M. Iulius Severus
*PVSV: P. Ullerius Stephanus Venator   
 
_____________________________________________
  
"VTI ROGAS" indicates a vote in favor of an item,
"ANTIQVO" is a vote against,
"ABSTINEO" is an open abstention. 
_____________________________________________

 
 
ITEM I – Decision about a possible public advertisement outside of Nova Roma or
a Nova Roman ad on the main list to get someone for the IT job. Discussion + voting.

The Senatores were asked to vote on Option 1 and/or Option 2. Option 1 was for placing an advertisement on our mailing list to try to find a cheaper solution. Option 2 was to try and find an outside programmer.

Item I - Option 1:
Vti Rogas - 20  
Antiqvo - 0 
Abstineo - 0
 
The result of the voting is Item I - Option 1 PASSED.
 
Item I - Option 2:
Vti rogas - 0
Antiqvo - 15
Astineo - 1
 
The result of the voting is Item I - Option 2 FAILED. 
 
*KFBQ: I.1 Vti rogas, I.2 Antiqvo.
*ATS: I.1 Vti rogas, I.2 Antiqvo. On Option 1 - "The website might also be a good place for this."  On Option 2 - "Let us try Option A  (or 1, though correct outlining follows the Roman numeral with a capital letter) first.  Even among my students there are several who are involved in IT."    
*CCS: I.1 Vti rogas, I.2 Antiqvo.  
*CFD: I.1 Vti rogas, I.2 Antiqvo. 
*CnEM: I.1 Vti rogas. 
*CnIC: I.1 Vti rogas, I.2 Antiqvo. On Option 2 - "We need to explore the possibly cheaper options, and examine the abilities, qualifications and references of those on the Main List who believe they can handle the task."  
*EqIL: I.1 Vti rogas. 
*KFBM: I.1 Vti rogas.
*LCSF: I.1 Vti rogas, I.2 Antiqvo.
*MAM: I.1 Vti rogas.
*MHM: I.1 Vti rogas, I.2 Antiqvo. 
*MIP: I.1 Vti rogas, I.2 Antiqvo. 
*MLA: I.1 Vti rogas, I.2 Antiqvo. On Option 2 - "Better to try option 1 before going to option 2."
*MMA: I.1 Vti rogas. 
*MMPH: I.1 Vti rogas, I.2 Antiqvo. On Option 2 - "This option would prove costly and leave less funds available to do the work needed. Better to try option 1 before going to option 2."
*PMA: I.1 Vti rogas, I.2 Abstineo. On Option 2 - "As the sub-item is written, it may be believed that both solutions are incompatible. But, if a first call "on the mailing list" cannot help us finding the appropriate candidate, we will have to find a programmer "outside"." 
*QFM: I.1 Vti rogas, I.2 Antiqvo. On Option 1 - "Members here would be the first choice since they know how Nova Roma works.  They already know the requirements the new program needs."  On Option 2 - "An outside designer will be pricey.  We all know programmers,  we deal with them daily in our mundane life.  Let's ask around."  
*QSP: I.1 Vti rogas, I.2 Antiqvo. On Option 2 - "An outside designer will be costly and I agree with QFM."    
*TiGPTi.: I.1 Vti rogas, I.2 Antiqvo. 
*TIS: I.1 Vti rogas, I.2 Antiqvo. On Option 1 - "Our members have priority. They know how the things are going on in Nova Roma and understand which are the requirements and expectations from the program or system they must create." On Option 2 - "That is an option only if the first don't work."

 
_____________________________________________________________
 
 
ITEM II – Appointment of a Central Financial Officer (CFO). Names will be sent
to the Senate in time for the contio if at all possible. Discussion + voting.
 
*Attention Citizens: there is a special note regarding the vote on Item II at the end of this report.*
 
The Senate was asked to vote on keeping Equestria Iunia Laeca as the CFO for Nova Roma for an extended period from May 8, 2763 auc., to September 30, 2763 auc., during which time a new CFO would be found or another reasonable solution to the handling of the finances of Nova Roma.

 
Item II
Vti Rogas - 18  
Antiqvo - 0 
Abstineo - 1  
 
The result of the voting is Item II PASSED. 
 
*KFBQ: Vti rogas. 
*ATS: Vti rogas. "She has done a fine job amid considerable difficulties. " 
*CCS: Vti rogas. 
*CFD: Vti rogas. 
*CnEM: Vti rogas. 
*CnIC: Vti rogas. 
*EqIL: Vti rogas. "The correct title should be Chief Financial Officer,
not Central Financial Officer."
*KFBM: Vti rogas.
*LCSF: Abstineo.
*MAM: Vti rogas.
*MHM: Vti rogas. "I admire and respect our CFO who has done so much to put Nova Roma's financial house in order, I hope the newly returned G. Popillius Laenas, who is an accountant will help & assume this burden."  
*MIP: Vti rogas. 
*MLA: Vti rogas. "I cannot agree more with the praise already given to Equestria Iunia. Her performance and dedication have been exemplary. Her work has been one of the best things that has happened in a long time and it will continue to benefit us all in the years to come."
*MMA: Vti rogas. 
*MMPH: Vti rogas. "Equestria Iunia has performed in a most exempliary and professional manner. All Nova Romans should offer her their thanks for the benefit she has provided to Nova Roman by her placing our finances on a more stable and secure footing, and for providing us with a system that allows accountability, improved financial reporting, and better budgeting. She deserves our thanks, and she deserves a respite from the duties she has performed so admirably over the past years." 
*QFM: Vti rogas. 
*QSP: Vti rogas. 
*TiGPTi.: Vti rogas. "I want to say thank you to Equestria Iunia Laeca for her outstanding service in a thankless position. She has done a superlative job. Her dedication is unmatched, her integrity untouchable, her performance outstanding, her attention to detail exceptional and her over all demeanor that of a consummate professional. Well done madam!" 
*TIS: Vti rogas. 

______________________________________________________

 
ITEM III – This Item was tabled. No discussion or vote.
 
_____________________________________________________
 
 
ITEM IV - Information about the Conventus in Rome from a.d. XV Kal. Quint., June 17, 2763 auc., to a.d. XI Kal. Quint., June 21, 2763 auc. Discussion only, no vote.
 
No information was presented about this Item, thus there was no discussion and no comments to be included in this report.
  
____________________________________________________  


 
*Special note concerning the vote on Item II.
 
Citizens,
 
On May 7 at 16:04 hours, Rome time, Consul Albucius voted on Item I, but on Item II, the Consul vetoed the vote. (Message# 16947 on the Senatus Romanus list).
 
Here are Consul Albucius' comments exactly as he posted them along with his veto:
 
 

"Item II - NO VOTE, for VETO on the period from June 20th to Sept. 30th. 
 
Comments: 
 
In Jan. 2761 auc, the consuls proposed the Senate the creation of an office of Chief Financial Officer. This office was to last two years, until last March 1st.. Hon. Iunia Laeca was, in the same senatus consultum, appointed as this CFO. In November 2761, Hon.Iunia was granted by the senate special century points for her service.


At this time, I had told my disagreement towards creating such CFO position, as long as we will not have solved the question of the relation between our Roman magistracies and offices and the positions that we would need in the frame of our association, NR Inc., under national laws.
 
My position as a consul is the same that my position, two years ago, as a senator, and is a fortiori confirmed by the last debate on the constitution preamble debate: if we intend to remain close to Roman principles and specially the organization of a Roman State, there is no place for a CF office for the Res publica has financial quaestors.
 
If on the contrary we consider that the external environment obliges us to be organized, at least for a few points, like an association, we may consider that such positions are required. We have the same difficulty for every technical position which did not exist in Ancient Rome, like for example the C.I.O. and the Magister aranearius ones.


Whatever the choice we do, we must be coherent and assume it.


Hon. Iunia's term has ended on last March 1st, at the natural time set by the senate, and in a context where Iunia's availabilities did not allow her taking part to the preparation of the Budget 2763 auc.
 
It was then, when a draft for new bylaws had been issued, the time to open from March on til now, a coherent and timely thinking and debate on this point. This is why, taking also in consideration Iunia's uneasy availability, I did not propose the Senate to prorogue the CFO's term, whoever the civis be in charge of it.


If the management of Nova Roma finances requires the utmost attention, it is not good policy to delay month after month decisions on the matter, and be obliged, by the calendar to prorogue by default a situation.


I am well conscious of the efforts of my colleague in order to have filled the CFoffice as soon as possible. I am grateful that Laeca could find new time to care about NR finances.
 
My second difficulty, in addition of the position evoked above, is that the consuls agreed in Sweden on a preliminary consultation; at the end of this consultation, a joint point would be made, and the way how to consult the senate would be decided at this time. By proposing Hon. Iunia a prorogation, my colleague has leaped over this step, despite my observations of last a.d. III Kal. Maias.


As I am sure that my dear colleague Quintilianus has acted with good will and faith, I have decided not to oppose his whole proposal, for we agree on the essential things, but just to veto it on the period going from June 20th on to September 30th. This will allow us to assume our financial priorities (the receipt of the annual taxes, the preparation of the meeting organized by my colleague in Rome, the first expenses on the IT Project, and to set some financial moves), and to boost the examination of the NR Inc. Bylaws, which we should has discussed sooner.
 
The present veto is naturally worth of a consular edict, issued on this day and hour, interceding on the item II, as worded above, currently presented by my colleague. It allows the normal application of the Item II, specially if approved, from May 8th to June 20th, and does not for the period from June 21st to Sept. 30th."
 
(end of comments)
____________________________________________________
 
 
Upon closer inspection of this unexpected and unprecedented action, I, as Tribuna Plebis, post the following to the Senatus Romanus list in response:
 
 
"From: Maxima Valeria Messallina <maximavaleriamessallina@...>
Subject: [SenatusRomanus] Intercessio
To: senatusromanus@yahoogroups.com, Tribunes@yahoogroups.com
Date: Sunday, May 9, 2010, 9:41 PM

 



 







Ex Officio Tribuna Plebis Maxima Valeria Messallina Senatui  
 
 
I, Maxima Valeria Messallina, Tribuna Plebis, hereby do pronounce intercessio against the veto of Consul P. Memmius Albucius given on May 7, 2763 auc., at 16:04 hours, Rome time, to the vote on Item II of the Senate's agenda. Upon closer inspection of this unexpected and unprecedented action, I issue this counter-veto for the following reasons:
 
The Constitution of Nova Roma states about the consules (2,d) that they may "pronounce intercessio (intercession; a veto) against another consul or magistrate of lesser authority.."  Therefore, a consul may veto the actions of another consul or magistrate, but there is nothing in our Constitution that states a consul may veto the collective decision of the Senate or any of the Comitia.  The law is implicit in its limits on a consul's actions.
 
Consul Albucius could have vetoed the proposed item when it was placed for discussion, but he took no such action at the proper time. Once a vote was called on said item, it was too late. 
 
Also, as per Article V of our Constitution "The supreme policy-making authority for Nova Roma shall be embodied in its Senate" and not in a consul. And as per Article IV, 7a, which states:
 



"To pronounce intercessio (intercession; a veto) against the actions of any other magistrate (with the exception of the dictator and the interrex), Senatus consulta, magisterial edicta, religious decreta, and leges passed by the comitia when the spirit and /or letter of this Constitution or legally-enacted edicta or decreta, Senatus Consulta or leges are being violated thereby;"
 
As a Tribune, I feel strongly that the veto of Consul Albucius violates the spirit, if not the letter of the law, because the full Senate is neither a consul nor a lesser magistrate.  



 
 
Valete bene in pace Deorum,
 
Maxima Valeria Messallina
Tribuna Plebis"
 
 
Tribuni Plebis C. Curius Saturninus, C. Petronius Dexter, and M. Octavius Corvus supported the intercessio.
 
 
On May 10, 2763 auc., at 11:58 hours, Rome time, Consul Albucius informed Consul Quintilianus that he was withdrawing his veto. Therefore, no vote is shown for Consul Albucius on Item II.
 
_________________________________________________________
 
Tribuni Plebis:

Maxima Valeria Messallina (reporting)
C. Curius Saturninus
C. Petronius Dexter
M. Octavius Corvus
C. Aquilius Rota 
  
Valete bene in pace Deorum,
 
Maxima Valeria Messallina
Tribuna Plebis




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75826 From: Gnaeus Iulius Caesar Date: 2010-05-14
Subject: Re: Responsum augurum de tripudio consularis
Caesar Catoni sal.

Salve amice.

Piscinus' statement is absolutely correct. The constitution sets out in I.B the well known order of legal precedence BUT later goes on to provide a specific exception, namely decreta issued by the collegia that cannot be overturned by a lex passed in comitia or a senatus consultum.

The only part of the above which makes sense is the lex in comitia, which under I.B is normally higher in authority. Under I.B a senatus consultum is never higher, unless it was a drafting error (likely) and it was meant to be an SCU. Regardless as it is written as an SC that is what it is, and therefore we have to discount that. The issue of the lex in comitia refers to a decretum being overturned by a lex. Therefore this makes sense if as Piscinus was stating we look to which came first. If a lex comes first a decretum that conflicts with it passed later cannot take precedence by virtue of I.B, BUT, a decretum passed first cannot then be over turned by a lex passed afterwards.

This makes perfect sense legally as it means if the collegia have spoken first, a lex cannot overturn its provisions, but if the people speak first via a lex a decretum cannot affect it. The lex Fabia was passed first, but included a specific section that allowed one section to be subject to and affected by a decreta, which is perfectly acceptable as the lex allows it. Piscinus points out a flaw in the decretum that invalidates it, leaving no decretum in effect to guide that section of the lex Fabia, therefore the bare bones content of the lex Fabia is the only guide to taking the auspices.

So I.B does actually have two sections that provide an exception to it, and as specific and later (coming after I.B) exceptions, under the generally accepted rules of legal interpretation (that you, I and others have followed in the many debates on legal matters) those two exceptions survive and make perfect sense legally and practically. They balance the rights of the people and the rights of the collegia in religious matters. Of course the collegia can only speak to the specific matters allowed under the constitution, so Piscinus again correctly points out this decretum was a mish mash affair, joint decreta not being recognized constitutionally nor having any place in the chain of legal authority, with collegia speaking to matters they have no power to. So long as a collegia speaks to the matters allowed under the constitution and gets in first with a decretum, then that decretum is protected from being overturned. No doubt this was a mechanism in the early days to ensure that a sudden influx of rabid ravening Christians plumping up the comitia didn't overturn religious matters <lol>.

Anyway Piscinus is spot on with his analysis, and thus the potential storm over the taking (or not) of the auspices by the consul is a redundant matter as only the lex Fabia survives, not the decretum.

Optime vale



From: Cato
Sent: Friday, May 14, 2010 7:05 AM
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Responsum augurum de tripudio consularis


Cato Piscino sal.

Mixed in among a large number of things is this curious statement:

"1. In any question over legal precedence between leges and decreta, the main initial consideration is which had preceeded the other. Leges passed by comitia may not nullify pre-existing decreta of a sacerdotal collegium, and decreta may not set conditions that would, in effect, nullify a pre-existing lex."

This is not true. The Constitution clearly states the order of legal precedence:

"This Constitution shall be the highest legal authority within Nova Roma, apart from edicts issued by a legally appointed dictator. It shall thereafter be followed in legal authority by edicta issued by consuls acting under the Senatus consulta ultima, laws properly voted and passed by one of the comitia, decreta passed by the collegium pontificum, decreta passed by the collegium augurum, Senatus consulta, and magisterial edicta (in order of descending authority as described in section IV of this Constitution), in that order."

No lex or edictum or decretum can override the Constitution's enumeration of legal precedence, so a law passed in comitia does, in fact, nullify a decretum. The Constitution does not allow for us to impose restrictions on its language regarding when a decretum or lex was passed, only that a lex overrides a decretum.

There is not even a question of a decretum having any effect on a lex.

Vale,

Cato







------------------------------------

Yahoo! Groups Links




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75827 From: Publius Memmius Albucius Date: 2010-05-14
Subject: "Responsum augurum de tripudio consularis"
Auguri Moravio s.d.

I take good acknowledgment of your "Responsum augurum de tripudio consularis", though it should rather be an "responsum auguralis" or a "responsum auguris".

On the matter, you did not demonstrate, just because you could not, that the consuls did not own any auspices. For they own them. The augurs were to assist the magistrates, not to replace them. A consul could take his auspices without an augur, but not the contrary.

Second, your reasoning tries to underline the fact that what a fundamental rule in Ancient Rome should not be a fundamental rule in Nova Roma. You provide interesting arguments that might however be reversed or opposed. Your main argument - that the consuls would be given just imperium, and not auspicium - is not admissible. For if I were to carry on a debate with you, I could oppose to it that, if all the characteristics (auspicium, potestas, administrative power, etc.) other than imperium were thus refused to the consuls, just because they have not been quoted explicitly, then our State would not really be a Roman one. In fact, the expression "magistrates with imperium" is just a periphrasis, another way to design our highest magistrates.

We cannot going on pretending having one thing and its contrary, here being the true heirs of Ancient Rome, while just keeping from our Ancients what, according our various sensitivities or political commitments, would sound better for us. If we have consuls, they do own the power of auspices, and its exercise cannot be challenged nor its validation submitted to any technical control. Augurs are assistants to magistrates and not the contrary.

I will not notice your remark on the personal and political cost of my position, for I think that it is inappropriate in a responsa which is supposed to issue a technical augural opinion.

I will just re-assess what I proposed when entering in office in January: that the religious colleges may begin to work, when necessary with the magistrates, so that the Religio Romana be better known, practiced by our officers, magistrates and citizens. The work is still to do. As I have already told you, there are many proceedings, Latin translations, etc. to be checked and corrected among, inter alia, the current augural tools. We officers, magistrates and citizens need assistance, information, pedagogical tools.

I know that you have already begun, these last days, working on new augural texts, that you have submitted to the Collegium Augurum. I hope that these texts will draw the consequence of the present episod and, renouncing ruling on the other constitutional powers' field (Senate, magistrates, etc.), that they will improve our common tools for a better daily practice of the Religio Romana. You will then have my full support.



Vale,





Albucius cos.







_________________________________________________________________
Installez gratuitement les nouvelles Emoch'ticones !
http://www.ilovemessenger.fr/emoticones/telecharger-emoticones-emochticones.aspx

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75828 From: marcushoratius Date: 2010-05-14
Subject: Re: Responsum augurum de tripudio consularis
Piscinus Catone, Caesari et omnibus s. p. d.

"The first division of things is into two classes; for some are subject to divine law, some to human law." ~ Institutiones Iustiniani II. 1-11

This is one of those situations where I had to consider both the human laws of Nova Roma, which are notoriously flawed, and the ars augurium subject only to divine law (fas). It is difficult enough to try to make sense of the contradictions contained in Nova Roma law. I therefore defer to our senatorial colleague Gn. Caesar to explain the legal matters in our all too human laws.

As members of the Senate ought to know, I brought certain quaestiones before the Collegium Pontificum. The Collegium Pontificum has deferred those quaestiones in regard to the distinction between imperium and auspicium to the augures publici. Therefore I have called for the Collegium Augurum to convene next week. My responsum is a prelude to that portion of our agenda that will consider these quaestiones.

I have issued a responsum as an official statement of my opinion on the matters of concern. It does not have the legal weight of a decretum; responsa augurum are not covered directly by the Constitution, although the power of an individual augur to declare an obnuntio, which is found in the Constitution, is in fact a type of responsum. It is left then to the constitutional authority of the Collegium Augurium whether to issue decreta on any issues related to the ars auguria and their application in Nova Roma. And any such decreta will be based on the source material that remains available on the ancient practice of auspicia.

Valete et vadete in pace Deorum





--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Gnaeus Iulius Caesar" <gn_iulius_caesar@...> wrote:
>
> Caesar Catoni sal.
>
> Salve amice.
>
> Piscinus' statement is absolutely correct. The constitution sets out in I.B the well known order of legal precedence BUT later goes on to provide a specific exception, namely decreta issued by the collegia that cannot be overturned by a lex passed in comitia or a senatus consultum.
>
> The only part of the above which makes sense is the lex in comitia, which under I.B is normally higher in authority. Under I.B a senatus consultum is never higher, unless it was a drafting error (likely) and it was meant to be an SCU. Regardless as it is written as an SC that is what it is, and therefore we have to discount that. The issue of the lex in comitia refers to a decretum being overturned by a lex. Therefore this makes sense if as Piscinus was stating we look to which came first. If a lex comes first a decretum that conflicts with it passed later cannot take precedence by virtue of I.B, BUT, a decretum passed first cannot then be over turned by a lex passed afterwards.
>
> This makes perfect sense legally as it means if the collegia have spoken first, a lex cannot overturn its provisions, but if the people speak first via a lex a decretum cannot affect it. The lex Fabia was passed first, but included a specific section that allowed one section to be subject to and affected by a decreta, which is perfectly acceptable as the lex allows it. Piscinus points out a flaw in the decretum that invalidates it, leaving no decretum in effect to guide that section of the lex Fabia, therefore the bare bones content of the lex Fabia is the only guide to taking the auspices.
>
> So I.B does actually have two sections that provide an exception to it, and as specific and later (coming after I.B) exceptions, under the generally accepted rules of legal interpretation (that you, I and others have followed in the many debates on legal matters) those two exceptions survive and make perfect sense legally and practically. They balance the rights of the people and the rights of the collegia in religious matters. Of course the collegia can only speak to the specific matters allowed under the constitution, so Piscinus again correctly points out this decretum was a mish mash affair, joint decreta not being recognized constitutionally nor having any place in the chain of legal authority, with collegia speaking to matters they have no power to. So long as a collegia speaks to the matters allowed under the constitution and gets in first with a decretum, then that decretum is protected from being overturned. No doubt this was a mechanism in the early days to ensure that a sudden influx of rabid ravening Christians plumping up the comitia didn't overturn religious matters <lol>.
>
> Anyway Piscinus is spot on with his analysis, and thus the potential storm over the taking (or not) of the auspices by the consul is a redundant matter as only the lex Fabia survives, not the decretum.
>
> Optime vale
>
>
>
> From: Cato
> Sent: Friday, May 14, 2010 7:05 AM
> To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Responsum augurum de tripudio consularis
>
>
> Cato Piscino sal.
>
> Mixed in among a large number of things is this curious statement:
>
> "1. In any question over legal precedence between leges and decreta, the main initial consideration is which had preceeded the other. Leges passed by comitia may not nullify pre-existing decreta of a sacerdotal collegium, and decreta may not set conditions that would, in effect, nullify a pre-existing lex."
>
> This is not true. The Constitution clearly states the order of legal precedence:
>
> "This Constitution shall be the highest legal authority within Nova Roma, apart from edicts issued by a legally appointed dictator. It shall thereafter be followed in legal authority by edicta issued by consuls acting under the Senatus consulta ultima, laws properly voted and passed by one of the comitia, decreta passed by the collegium pontificum, decreta passed by the collegium augurum, Senatus consulta, and magisterial edicta (in order of descending authority as described in section IV of this Constitution), in that order."
>
> No lex or edictum or decretum can override the Constitution's enumeration of legal precedence, so a law passed in comitia does, in fact, nullify a decretum. The Constitution does not allow for us to impose restrictions on its language regarding when a decretum or lex was passed, only that a lex overrides a decretum.
>
> There is not even a question of a decretum having any effect on a lex.
>
> Vale,
>
> Cato
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75829 From: Publius Ullerius Stephanus Venator Date: 2010-05-14
Subject: Re: Results of the Senate Meeting of April 2763 auc.
Salve Messalina;

Thank you for the report of the Senate votes, but one minor
correction...I am no longer a Senator, so I could not have voted,
regardless.

I resigned earlier this year in the circumstances surrounding my
father's terminal illness and passing. I'll take it as a compliment
that you still think me Senatorial material.

If the censors failed to de-list me, I feel able to serve again and
would be willing to participate. I am still here, to help our People
and the Republic.

in amicitia - Venator
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75830 From: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com Date: 2010-05-15
Subject: Reminder Ludi Apollinares, 5/15/2010, 12:00 pm
Reminder from:   Nova-Roma Yahoo! Group
 
Title:   Reminder Ludi Apollinares
 
Date:   Saturday May 15, 2010
Time:   12:00 pm - 1:00 pm
Repeats:   This event repeats every week until Friday July 9, 2010.
Location:   Ludi Apollinares
Notes:   Don't forget to be inspired and start your project for the Ludi honoring Apollo!

http://www.novaroma.org/nr/MMDCCLXIII/Ludi_Apollinares
 
Copyright © 2010  Yahoo! Inc. All Rights Reserved | Terms of Service | Privacy Policy
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75831 From: marcushoratius Date: 2010-05-15
Subject: IDUS MAIAE: MERCURIALIA
M. Moravius Piscinus Horatianus Quiritibus et omnibus salutem plurimam dicit: Mercurius felicitatem in nos impertiat.

Hodie est Idus Maiae; haec dies nefastus piaculum est: feriae Iovi; Mercuralia: Mecurio et Maiae ad circum maximum

Commentarii Pontifici: Working on dies nefasti

"It is affirmed that someone who does something unwittingly on such [a holiday] ought to offer a sacrifice with a pig. Scaevola the pontifex said that it was not possible for someone who knowingly did something on a holiday to expiate the crime, but Umbro denies that a person is polluted who does something pertaining to the Gods or for the sake of the rites or who does something looking to the urgent necessity of life. Scaevola, asked then what it was possible to do on a holiday, responded that it was possible to do what would cause harm if it were not done. Thus if a cow fell into a cave and the paterfamilias, summoning assistance, could free it, he would not seem to have polluted the holiday; nor would the person who saves a broken beam from imminent ruin by propping it up." ~ Macrobius, Saturnalia1.16.10-11

"Glorious Mercury, grandson of Atlas, be present here today as You were once upon Arcadia's hill, a Pleiad's son by Jove. Arbiter in peace and in arms among the Gods of the heavens above and on earth, traveler on winged feet, You who enjoys the lyre and who takes pleasure in whoever glistens with the wrestler's ointment, You who has taught eloquent speech in all tongues, for You on the Ides of May, the Fathers once dedicated a sacred shrine near the Circus and named this day ever after to be Your feast day." ~ Ovid Fasti 5.663-70

AUC 258 / 495 BCE: Dedication of the Temple of Mercurius on the Aventine Hill

The location of the Temple of Mercurius was near the Circus Maximus (CIL 11.3592). Very early in the Republic there was a guild of merchants, a collegia of Mercurales or mercatores, associated with this temple. The location, at that date would suggest that this was a plebeian cultus originally. His introduction to Rome came from Greek Hermes at the time when extensive trade of grain from Sicily and other parts of Magna Graecae began. Whether a Mercurius was at Rome before this time, and what may have been his character, cannot be know. There is no evidence of an earlier Mercurius, so we are left only with an imported Roman cultus for Greek Hermes. At Rome Mercurius remained primarily a God of Trade. Other aspects of Mercurius as a civilizing God of athletics and eloquence, inventor of the lyre, messenger of the Gods, God of thieves and liars, all came from Greek influence. Even among the Samnites where He appears as psychopomp, He is named after the Greek as Eclus on the Tavolo Agnone in association with other chthonic deities and Ceres.


"Mercurius, by Atlas born to Maia, God who fashioned our uncivilized ancestors into cultured men of urbane speech and athletic bearing, to You I sing, Messenger of the Gods and of mighty Jove, inventor of the curved lyre, it pleases You to compose secret jokes and play pranks skillfully. Gladly You restore pious souls to their proper places and by the golden staff confine the trivial quarrel. Dear are You to the Gods above and below." ~ Horace Carmina 1.10.1-8; 20-24

How is Mercurius both a son of Atlas and is said at another time to be the son of Jupiter? The answer is that the Romans recognized that there were more than one Mercurius.

"One Mercurius has Caelus as father and Dies as mother (Sky and Day). He is represented in a state of sexual excitation traditionally said to be due to passion inspired by the sight of Proserpina. Another is the son of Valens and Phoronis. This is the subterranean Mercurius identified with Trophonius. The third, the son of the third Jove and Maia; the legends make Him the father of Pan by Penelope. The fourth has the Nile as father; the Egyptians deem it sinful to pronounce His name. The fifth, worshipped by the people of Pheneus, is said to have killed Argus and consequently to have fled in exile to Egypt, where He gave the Egyptians their laws and letters. His Egyptian name is Theuth, which is also the name in the Egyptian calendae for the first month of their year." ~ M. Tullius Cicero, De Natura Deorum 3.56


The first Mercurius mentioned by Cicero is seen in the tintinnabula hung about the front doors of Roman houses, or set up as statues in gardens. These ithyphallic Mercuri, at times with multiple phalli protruding from such charms, and likewise with the herms, were intended to ward off ill-rumors, the evil eye, disease, and even robbers. It is His association with the Underworld, leading souls to the realm of Orcus, that He provided protection against such ills. Phallic charms were displayed in many ways, always with a similar purpose of warding off evil and disease. Not all of these fascina were associated with Mercurius however. Others were associated with Hercules, Silvanus, and of course Priapus. As the son of Caelus and Dies, this is also the Mercurius of astrologers.

"Mercurius Cyllenius, principle author of all sacred knowledge, at times within Heaven, at other times travelling within the starry signs to open the celestial paths to the highest parts above and the lowest paths beneath the earth. You stitch together the stars in the empty void of space into constellations, name them and determine their course; may it have been for us to reverently use the greater powers of the universe that You make, pondering them, not in all matters, but in the potential of things in themselves, and to learn of the divine plan set for the greatest nations." ~ Manilius Astronomicon 1.30ff


The second Mercurius comes from Greek legend. He and his brother Agamedes were famed architects. The Temple of Apollo at Delphi was one of many buildings attributed to them. Another was the treasuries of King Augeas of Elis and that of Hyrieus of Boeotia. It was said that the brothers had cleverly designed the latter treasure with a secret entrance with which they then pilfered from Hyrieus. The king laid a trap, catching Agamedes in the act. To save himself from betrayal by Agamedes, Trophonius cut off his brother's head, but then had to flee Hyrieus anyway. The earth opened a chasm to receive him at Lebadea and by command of Apollo a cultus was established for Trophonius as the oracle of Zeus Trophonius (Pausanius 9.37: 4). However, Cicero tells a different story. After they completed the Delphic Temple of Apollo, Trophonius and Agamedes asked Apollo for a reward. In return for their work, He promised that seven days hence they would receive the best gift that could be given to men. On the seventh day they both died a peaceful death (Tusculanae Quaestiones 1.114). We might consider this Mercurius to be the patron of thieves found in the plays of Plautus.

"Praise and thanks we ought justly to give to the great God of treachery (Mercurius), for surely there is no end in sight to our own slanderous ways, our deceitfulness or our slyness." ~ Plautus Asinaria 545-6

"(O Mercury) whether I have falsely called You to bear witness in the past, or deceitfully called upon Jupiter not to hear my empty promises, or if there is some other god or goddess that I knowingly deceived, wash away my past perjuries, wash away yesterday's perfidious words, and allow me new perjuries to make when the new day dawns, and make the gods be indifferent to my lies. Grant that I may profit, grant joy in making a profit, grant that I may enjoy once more swindling my customers with deceitful words." ~ Ovid Fasti 5.681-90


The fourth and fifth Mercuri of Egypt, and even the later Trismegistis of Hermetism, do not concern us here. Today saw a sacrifice to Maia as mother of Mercurius, in a joint recognition at His Temple. Also today held a festival for Jupiter. Thus today's Mecurialia is really for the third Mercurius identified by Cicero. It is He that is identified as Messenger of the Gods.

"Mercury, Cyllene's Glory, Heaven's pride, Messenger with the clever tongue, around whose golden staff the serpent coil, may it shine brightly among the Gods. May You enjoy Your stolen loves, whether You desire Venus or Ganymede, and on the Ides may Your Mother's altar be adorned with laurels, and Your grandfather Atlas bear a lighter load." ~ Martial Epigrammata 7.74

"It is well. Nothing more ample do I pray, O Maia's son, save that You will make these my gifts last throughout my life. May You, Mercurius, make plump the riches of my house and all else there, spare my natural talents in any case, and as usual, may You remain the primary guardian over me." ~ Q. Horatius Flaccus, Satura 2.6.4-5; 2.6.14-5


Our thought for today is from Marcus Aurelius, Meditations 12.6

"Practice thyself even in the things which thou despairest of accomplishing. For even the left hand, which is ineffectual for all other things for want of practice, holds the bridle more vigorously than the right hand; for it has been practiced in this."
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75832 From: Sabinus Date: 2010-05-15
Subject: Mercuralia - Sacrifice to Mercurius.
T. Iulius Sabinus, pontifex, sacerdos Mercuri: magistratibus, Senatui Populoque Novo Romano, civibus Novae Romae, quiritibus et peregrinibus, salutem plurimam dicit:

This 15th of May, the day of Mercuralia, I performed a sacrifice to Mercurius to obtain his benevolence, praying Him to be willingly propitious with us, to take care about our jobs, businesses and investments, travel safety and bless us, our families and friends, with fortune.

This was the ritual:

Favéte linguís!

(Beginning of the sacrifice)

PRAEFATIO:

Mercuri,
té hóc túre commovendó bonás precés precor,
uti sies volens propitius Populó Novó Rómánó Quirítibus,
mihi, domo, familiae!

(Incense was placed in the focus of the altar.)

Mercuri,
uti té túre commovendó bonás precés precátus sum,
eiusdem reí ergó macté vínó inferió estó!"

(Libation of wine was made.)

PRECATIO:

Mercuri,
Hisce Idibus Maiis té precor, quaesóque:
uti Rem Publicam Populí Noví Rómání Quirítium
confirmés, augeás, adiúvés;
utíque divitiae, opes, fortunae Populí Noví Rómání Quirítium
créscant et convaléscant;
utíque sies volens propitius
nóbis pontificibus, senatui populóque Novó Rómánó,
consulibus, praetóribus, cénsóribus, aedílibus,
quaestóribus, tribúnís plébis, omnibus cívibus,
mihi, domo, familiae!

SACRIFICIUM:

Quárum rérum ergó macté
hóc vínó libandó,
hóc túre ommovendó
estó fító volens propitius
populó Novó Rómánó Quirítibus,
nóbis, domibus, familiís!

(Libation of wine was made and incense was sacrificed)

Ílicet!

(End of the sacrifice)

PIACULUM:

Iáne,
Mercuri,
Iuppiter, Iúnó, Minerva,
Concordia, Omnés Dí Immortálés:
sí quid vóbis in hác caerimóniá displicuit,
hóc vínó inferió veniam petó
et vitium meum expió.

(Libation of wine was made)
----------------------------

The web address of the Aedes Mercuri is:
http://www.dacia-novaroma.org/Temple-of-Mercurius.htm

And here is a collection of prayers to Mercurius gathered from literary and epigraphic sources by our Pontifex Maximus, M. Moravius Piscinus Horatianus:
http://www.novaroma.org/nr/Prayers_to_Mercurius
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75833 From: Maxima Valeria Messallina Date: 2010-05-15
Subject: The Drowning of the Dummies and one hungry fish...
Maxima Valeria Messallina omnibus S.P.D.
 
 
Yesterday, May the 14th, was the day in ancient Rome when a procession carrying the argei round the shrines took place, probably counterwise. The procession included the Flamen Dialis, Flaminica, Vestal Virgins and the praetor urbanus. The procession culminated at the river Tiber, when 30 (or 27) effigies were thrown into the river by the Vestal Virgins from the Bridge of Sublicius.  
Argei were bundles of rushes resembling people bound hand and foot. Also known as the Drowning of the Dummies, this ritual was an act of purification from all the evils of the year, which the argei personified.
I performed this ritual yesterday. Before sunrise, I placed the two argei before the Sacred Flame, one dummy representing the male and one dummy representing the female. (I make them using bulrushes and it takes me about a week to do both. I imagine that the ancient Vestals spent longer than a week to make 27 or 30 of these effigies.)
I offered prayers that all Nova Romans and their loved ones (pets included) be shielded from all evils. Then I bound the argei's hands and feets according to tradition.
It was foggy and a chilly 50 F (10 C). In my Vestal clothes, I went alone to the beach, which is just a short walk from my house. It was 5:15 a.m. and I encountered no one along the way. I waded into the ocean until I was chest deep but still able to hold my arms above the water. I held up the argei, one in either hand and after another prayer that this sacrifice would be accepted, I threw them in.
I waited to see if the waves brought the argei back when the most extraordinary thing happened. A rather large fish jumped up out of the water on my right side. It was no more than a foot away from me. Startled the heck out of me, but it was a good thing I was looking to my right when the fish jumped out or I don't think I would have seen that it had one of the argei in its mouth. It did happen quite quickly, but I nevertheless saw the feet of the dummy sticking out of the fish's mouth! I was stunned.
Now, when I had been saying the prayer, I did feel fish swimming by my legs, but that is not uncommon in these waters were commerical fishing still thrives and lots of local people fish along the beach as well as on the pier. 
I couldn't stand the cold anymore and I got out of the water and went home to change out of my wet clothes. I returned promptly to the beach and walked the full length of the seashore checking to see if the second dummy had washed ashore. It did not. I concluded that it either went out to sea or another fish got it.
By this time, there were plenty of fishermen on the beach and I described to one of them the fish I had seen - about three feet long (60 centimeters) and red. He said it sounded like it was a female Sheephead and he told me that kind of fish has strong jaws and feeds on urchins and shellfish. So I guess to that hungry fish, the argei must have seemed a good, crunchy treat. : )
 
Valete bene in pace Deorum,
 
Maxima Valeria Messallina
Sacerdos Vestalis




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75834 From: Maxima Valeria Messallina Date: 2010-05-15
Subject: Re: Results of the Senate Meeting of April 2763 auc.
Salve, Venator
 
I do remember all the posts about your father and his passing, may he be at peace.
You are still on the Senate list and it's hard to think of the Senate without you. Nevertheless, I should have remembered. Sorry about that!
 
Vale bene,
 
Maxima Valeria Messallina
 
 
 


<<--- On Fri, 5/14/10, Publius Ullerius Stephanus Venator <famila.ulleria.venii@...> wrote:


 
Salve Messalina;

Thank you for the report of the Senate votes, but one minor
correction...I am no longer a Senator, so I could not have voted,
regardless.

I resigned earlier this year in the circumstances surrounding my
father's terminal illness and passing. I'll take it as a compliment
that you still think me Senatorial material.

If the censors failed to de-list me, I feel able to serve again and
would be willing to participate. I am still here, to help our People
and the Republic.

in amicitia - Venator>>




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75835 From: petronius_dexter Date: 2010-05-15
Subject: Re: Mercuralia - Sacrifice to Mercurius.
Ave Sabine amice,

I saw that you use "apices" on your prayer.Much as they are uggly for reading this beautiful language (imagine stresses or pitches on English words ;o)...), if you use it, please do it without mistakes, at least for Mercury.

> This was the ritual:
>
> Favéte linguís!
>
> (Beginning of the sacrifice)
>
> PRAEFATIO:
>
> Mercuri,
> té hóc túre commovendó bonás precés precor,
> uti

utí

> sies

I wonder if it is not: siés

> volens propitius Populó Novó Rómánó Quirítibus,
> mihi, domo,

mihí, domó,

> familiae!

> (Incense was placed in the focus of the altar.)
>
> Mercuri,
> uti

utí

> té túre commovendó bonás precés precátus sum,
> eiusdem reí ergó macté vínó inferió estó!"

éiusdem ... are you sure about this macté? In my opinion, the right pronunciation is macte.

> (Libation of wine was made.)
>
> PRECATIO:
>
> Mercuri,
> Hisce Idibus Maiis té precor, quaesóque:

Hísce Ídibus Máiís

> uti Rem Publicam Populí Noví Rómání Quirítium

utí ... Públicam

> confirmés, augeás, adiúvés;
> utíque divitiae,

... dívitiae,

> opes,

opés

> fortunae

fortúnae

> Populí Noví Rómání Quirítium
> créscant et convaléscant;
> utíque sies volens propitius
> nóbis pontificibus, senatui

senátuí

> populóque Novó Rómánó,
> consulibus, praetóribus, cénsóribus, aedílibus,
> quaestóribus, tribúnís plébis, omnibus cívibus,
> mihi, domo, familiae!

mihí, domó

> SACRIFICIUM:
>
> Quárum rérum ergó macté

macte

> hóc vínó libandó,

líbandó

Optime vale.

C. Petronius Dexter
Arcoiali scribebat
Idibus Maiis P. Memmio K. Fabio II coss.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75836 From: Publius Ullerius Stephanus Venator Date: 2010-05-15
Subject: To Messallina, was Re: [Nova-Roma] Results of...
Salve Maxima Valeria;

On Sat, May 15, 2010 at 2:06 PM, Maxima Valeria Messallina wrote:
>
> Salve, Venator
>
> I do remember all the posts about your father and his passing, may he be at peace.
> You are still on the Senate list and it's hard to think of the Senate without you. Nevertheless, I should have remembered. Sorry about that!
>
> Vale bene,
>
> Maxima Valeria Messallina
>

Thank you for your kind words.

Sometimes, in the torrent, which is our national communications
system, some details may get washed away in the flood.

I do believe my dad is at rest. I sat with him that last night for a
few hours and he was quietly humming and singing to himself. His eyes
were closed and he was gently smiling, so I know he was seeing
pleasant images. He knew I was there and was content to move on to
the next stage of his journey. He waited only to be sure that he had
indeed made it to his 75th birthday. He took his First and Last
Breaths of this Life on the same minute, on the same day, all those
years apart; a poetic thing in and of itself.

It is in part due to his example that I keep coming back to try and
serve our Res Publica, why I (some might say) continue to beat my head
against a stone wall of some things going awry...

A little more thought has tempered my earlier burst of enthusiasm, I
do need a bit more time to heal as fully as one can from a loss such
as this.

I am, however, looking forward to serving once again, as my father did
for 16 years in the local "Senate" of my hometown (we had the Town
Meeting form of government when I was a boy and youth and my dad was a
meeting member, elected annually by the citizens in our ward) and for
almost 40 years as a Boy Scout leader.

While he was a very private man, very Roman in his way, he believed
that we owed of ourselves to the broader community.

I look forward to the future, and to being more active.

In amicitia et fides - P Ullerius
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75837 From: C.Maria Caeca Date: 2010-05-16
Subject: thoughts on the recent past ...
C. Maria omnibus in foro S. P. D.

I have read, over the last few weeks, several comments on what occurred
during the debate in the comitia and on the Main List just before the last
election, and, as usual, I have a few things to say. Most of the comments
seem to indicate that what happened was at best the usual rather nasty
discord, and at worst, an indication of the disfavor of the Dei Imortales.
Yet, I reacted somewhat differently, and the perspective of time has not
changed my view.

I noticed several differences between what happened in those debates and our
usual somewhat chaotic brawls. First, for the most part, the posts were
courteous, and took exception to issues, and not people. Next, I saw, on
several occasions attempts at real dialog, where people with diametrically
opposing views actually attempted to find common ground, and work their way,
often slowly and with difficulty to consensus. That worked, occasionally,
and often did not ...but the attempt was made, and *that* is something I
rarely see happen here. I saw a high level of honesty, too ...people
speaking from the heart, speaking their truth as they saw it, and saw that
honesty acknowledged, if not specifically, in the treatment which they
received.

Yes, the debates wee heated. Yes, it was a difficult time ...people heard
what they did not wish to hear. There was also, naturally a fair share of
high handed arrogance, but that came from where I expected, so I passed over
it lightly. Some dismissed the opposing arguments as stupid and a waste of
time; again, from expected sources, and again, I gave those posts the
attention that I felt they merited.

In the end, what I saw, though, however contentious, was healthy ...for the
reasons listed above, and also because of the high level of participation,
and not just from those who usually post. To decry healthy debate, however
passionate and fierce is *extremely* dangerous, because to decry it may well
lead to the desire to repress it, and, if that desire comes from those who
have the power to do so effectively ...then, Amici et Amicae, we have set
our feet firmly on a road that will take us from a Republic into a
Principate. I, for one, would find such a pass unacceptable.

I do not know yet what, if anything was resolved, or whether we can point to
anything as an accomplishment resulting from those debates. I can only
speak for myself, but I found them extremely valuable because I was forced
to sit down and really clarify what NR is (to me), why I came, and
ultimately why I will stay and how I, in some small way, might be of service
to my Res Publica. I suspect this may be true for many ...and such self
examination, shared or not, is no without value.

Respectfully,
Valete quam optime,
CMC
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75838 From: marcushoratius Date: 2010-05-16
Subject: a. d. XVII Kalendas Iunonias: Veii and the Alban Lake
M. Moravius Piscinus Horatianus Quiritibus et omnibus salutem plurimam dicit: Di Deaeque vos ament

Hodie est ante diem XVII Kalendas Iunonias; haec dies fastus aterque est.

AUC 971 / 218 CE Ascension of Elagabalus as emperor.

"Now when Macrinus had been slain and also his son Diadumenianus, who had been given an equal share of the power and also the name Antoninus, the imperial office was bestowed upon Varius Elagabalus, solely because he was reputed to be the son of Bassianus. As a matter of fact, he was the priest of Elagabalus (sometimes called Jupiter, or the Sun), and had merely assumed the name Antoninus in order to prove his descent or else because he had learned that this name was so dear to mankind that for its sake even the parricide Bassianus had been greatly beloved. Originally, he had the name Varius, but later he was called Elagabalus because he was priest of this god — whom he afterwards brought with him from Syria to Rome, founding a temple for him on the site of an earlier shrine of Orcus. Finally, when he received the imperial power, he took the name Antoninus and was the last of the Antonines to rule the Roman Empire." ~ Historia Augusta, Elagabalus 4-7

Nothing is known about this Temple of Orcus. Elagabalus brought the sacred stone of Elagabalus to Rome. He built two temples: the Eliogabalium on the Palatine and another outside the City near the Porta Maggiore. The stone was carried in procession between these two temples.


AUC 356 / 397 BCE: Prophecy of the fall of Veii

"During this period many portents were announced, but as they rested on the testimony of single individuals, and there were no soothsayers to consult as to how to expiate them, owing to the hostile attitude of the Etruscans, these reports were generally disbelieved and disregarded. One incident, however, caused universal anxiety. The Alban Lake rose to an unusual height, without any rainfall or other cause which could prevent the phenomenon from appearing supernatural. Envoys were sent to the oracle of Delphi to ascertain why the Gods sent the portent. But an explanation was afforded nearer at hand. An aged Veientine was impelled by destiny to announce, amidst the jeers of the Roman and Etruscan outposts, in prophetic strain, that the Romans would never get possession of Veii until the water had been drawn off from the Alban Lake. This was at first treated as a wild utterance, but afterwards it began to be talked about. Owing to the length of the war, there were frequent conversations between the troops on both sides, and a Roman on outpost duty asked one of the townsmen who was nearest to him who the man was who was throwing out such dark hints about the Alban Lake. When he heard that he was a soothsayer, being himself a man not devoid of religious fears, he invited the prophet to an interview on the pretext of wishing to consult him, if he had time, about a portent which demanded his own personal expiation. When the two had gone some distance from their respective lines, unarmed, apprehending no danger, the Roman, a young man of immense strength, seized the feeble old man in the sight of all, and in spite of the outcry of the Etruscans, carried him off to his own side. He was brought before the commander-in-chief and then sent to the senate in Rome. In reply to inquiries as to what he wanted people to understand by his remark about the Alban Lake, he said that the Gods must certainly have been wroth with the people of Veii on the day when They inspired him with the resolve to disclose the ruin which the Fates had prepared for his native city. What he had then predicted under divine inspiration he could not now recall or unsay, and perhaps he would incur as much guilt by keeping silence about things which it was the will of heaven should be revealed as by uttering what ought to be concealed. It stood recorded in the Books of Fate, and had been handed down by the occult science of the Etruscans, that whenever the water of the Alban Lake overflowed and the Romans drew it off in the appointed way, the victory over the Veientines would be granted them; until that happened the Gods would not desert the walls of Veii. Then he explained the prescribed mode of drawing off the water. The senate, however, did not regard their informant as sufficiently trustworthy in a matter of such importance, and determined to wait for the return of their embassy with the oracular reply of the Pythian God.

"The issues of the other wars, especially of that against Veii, were still undecided, and the Romans were already despairing of success through their own efforts, and were looking to the Fates and the Gods, when the embassy returned from Delphi with the sentence of the oracle. It was in accord with the answer given by the Veientine soothsayer, and ran as follows:-

"See to it, Roman, that the rising flood
At Alba flow not o'er its banks and shape
Its channel seawards. Harmless through thy fields
Shalt thou disperse it, scattered into rills.
Then fiercely press upon thy foeman's walls,
For now the Fates have given thee victory.
That city which long years thou hast besieged
Shall now be thine. And when the war hath end,
Do thou, the victor, bear an ample gift
Into my temple, and the ancestral rites
Now in disuse, see that thou celebrate
Anew with all their wonted pomp."

~ Titus Livius 5.15-16


AUC 547 / 206 BCE: Portents and Vesta's fire extinguished

"In the anxiety caused by the strain of such a serious war when men referred every occurrence, fortunate or the reverse, to the direct action of the gods, numerous portents were announced. At Tarracina the temple of Jupiter, at Satricum that of Mater Matuta were struck by lightning. At the latter place quite as much alarm was created by the appearance of two snakes which glided straight through the doors into the temple of Jupiter. From Antium it was reported that the ears of corn seemed to those who were reaping them to be covered with blood. At Caere a pig had been farrowed with two heads, and a lamb yeaned which was both male and female. Two suns were said to have been seen at Alba, and at Fregellae it had become light during the night. In the precinct of Rome an ox was said to have spoken; the altar of Neptune in the Circus Flaminius was asserted to have been bathed in perspiration, and the temples of Ceres, Salus and Quirinus were all struck by lightning. The consuls received orders to expiate the portents by sacrificing full-grown victims and to appoint a day of solemn intercession. These measures were carried out in accordance with the senatorial resolution. What was a much more terrifying experience than all the portents reported from the country or seen in the City, was the extinction of the fire in the temple of Vesta. The vestal who was in charge of the fire that night was severely flogged by order of P. Licinius, the Pontifex Maximus. Though this was no portent sent by the gods, but merely the result of human carelessness, it was decided to sacrifice full-grown victims and hold a service of solemn supplication in the temple of Vestal." ~ Titus Livius 28.11


The Ovation

"The 'ovation' crown is of myrtle; it was worn by generals who entered the city in an ovation. The occasion for awarding an ovation, and not a triumph, is that wars have not been declared in due form and so have not been waged with a legitimate enemy, or that the adversaries' character is low or unworthy, as in the case of slaves or pirates, or that, because of a quick surrender, a victory was won which was 'dustless,' as the saying is, and bloodless. For such an easy victory they believed that the leaves sacred to Venus were appropriate, on the ground that it was a triumph, not of Mars, but as it were of Venus. And Marcus Crassus, when he returned after ending the Servile war and entered the city in an ovation, disdainfully rejected the myrtle crown and used his influence to have a decree passed by the senate, that he should be crowned with laurel, not with myrtle. I must not pass over a point relating to ovations, about which I learn that the ancient writers disagreed. Some of them have stated that the man who celebrated an ovation was accustomed to enter the city on horseback. But Masurius Sabinus says that they entered on foot, followed, not by their soldiers, but by the senate in a body." ~ A. Gellius, Noctes Atticae 5.6.21-27


Our thought for today is from Musonius, recorded in Noctes Atticae 5.1.5:

"(Musonius said that) great applause is not inconsistent with admiration, but that the greatest admiration gives rise, not to words, but to silence."
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75839 From: marcushoratius Date: 2010-05-16
Subject: Re: "Responsum augurum de tripudio consularis"
M. Moravius Piscinus Pontifex Maximus et Magister Collegii Augurum P. Memmio Consuli s. p. d.

Once again, as you seem not to understand, you do NOT of the power of auspicium. There in *no* mention in Nova Roma law of any magistrate having auspicium. The lex imperio makes NO mention of such a power. The Lex Arminia Equitia de imperio that tried to define imperium makes absolutely no mention of of the power of auspicium, and ought not as the two are spearate and distinct. Whereas the Constitution does place authority over the practice of the auspices and the ars auguria with the augures alone. NO Nova Roma consul has ever disregarded the auspices as you have done. NO Nova Roma consul has ever tried to usurp such powers as you have done.

Lacking any basis in Nova Roma law you have reverted to history. Fine. In the absence of clear definition, we do rely on the mos maiorum to help interpret our own laws. But your perception of history is eskewed. Imperium is *not* the same as auspicium. Imperium was never thought to be the same as auspicium. Auspicium was always been separate from imperium.

The matter of dispute between us concerns your performance of a tripudium in January to call a session of the Senate, a tripudium that improper and vitiated by your reported action, and then your avoidance of the results of the auspices taken three times by myself for holding the Comitia Centuria in April, when I was driven back each time from taking any auspices. I advised you then that I take the auspices for the Senate and later return to take auspices for the comitia separately. You agreed, but then later claimed favorable auspices when there had not been. "Oh, the monstrous impudence of such a proceeding!" For your hubris is no less than Cicero decried against Marc Antonius.

Let us examine the historical precedents and the mos maiorum against your claims. There is only one description of a tripudium, one made by Sabidius on the Fragmentum Versuum Saliorum Commentarii, recorded in the Scholia Veron. Aen. 10.241:

"Before a line of battle was drawn up and the signal to engage given to the army, the general, under whose authority and auspices it served, would be seated in the tabernacle to take the auspices in the presence of the army. The sacred chickens were let out of their coop and into the area around his seat."

First, the phrase used here "imperium auspicumque" distinguishing these as separate powers of a consul.

Secondly, a consul never held both imperium and auspicium together at the same time. "Indeed, the time at which our generals begin the conduct of wars is when they have laid down the right to take the auspices (Cicero, De Natura Deorum 2.10)." A consul had to perform certain religious duties at the beginning of the year, for which he employed auspicium. Only after he had completed those rites could he convene the Senate. Only after completing other religious obligations, including the laying aside of auspicium, could a consul then exercise imperium to recruit an army and lead it off to war. This is what Livy means when he said "Prior to the departure of the consuls religious observances were kept up for nine days (27.37)." They could not depart or exercise imperium, before all religious obligations were fulfilled, and it was only during that initial stage of their term that they would hold auspicium in order to conduct those religious obligations.

You might also look a Livy 22,9,7: "Q. Fabius Maximus was now Dictator for the second time. On the very day of his entrance upon office he summoned a meeting of the senate, and commenced by discussing matters of religion. He made it quite clear to the senators that C. Flaminius' fault lay much more in his neglect of the auspices and of his religious duties than in bad generalship and foolhardiness. The Gods themselves, he maintained, must be consulted as to the necessary measures to avert Their displeasure."

What was the crime of Flaminius? "Cælius records that the disregard shown by Caius Flaminius for religion led to his overthrow at Trasimene, which entailed serious injury upon the state, and it may be understood from these men's disastrous end that it was under the leadership of those who had observed the requirements of religion that the state became great (Cic. Nat. Deo 2.10)." That is, he evaded his religious obligation and rushed to this army, exercising a false imperium before laying aside auspicium. In your case, you never had auspicium to begin with. Only the Comitia Curiata can install a magistrate with auspicium. A lex curiata de imperio grants a curule magistrate imperium, as we do in Nova Roma. The curiata also would pass a separate lex de auspicio for praetores and consules alone; not for aediles curules. The leges curiata were separate, and made at separate times because auspicium and imperium were separate powers and exercised at different times in a consul's term of office. But in Nova Roma, the Comitia Curiata does not, did not, pass a lex de auspicio to give you a power of auspicium as it did a lex de imperio.

You are trying to conflate auspicium into imperium when the two are distinctly different powers.

Now let us go back to your so-called tripudium. According to your report to the Collegium Augurum, which you posted to the website, you stood for the whole time that a single chicken came out of his coop, and you observed the direction of her movement rather than note the sound of puls fall from her beak. First, this was not a a sonivium tripudium. Second, you vitiated the rite by standing. All forms of auspicia immediately end when the auspex rises from his seat, whereas you never sat to take the auspices in the first place.

Second, tripudia are used by generals in the field, because they do not hold aupsicium when exercising imperium over their army in the field. It is a special type and a very limited sort of auspication. The results of a tripudium do *not* extend across a river. A general with his army had to stop each time he crossed a river and take a new tripudium before proceed, as Cicero complained was not being done in his time. The augures defined different territory according to their auspices, and each were bounded by rivers and other bodies of water. A tripudium could only be used for something local, and not for calling the Senate into session as you did - first because it was not the type of auspication used inside the pomoerium, and secondly because your tripudium at home would never extend across Gallia, let alone beyond it.

Nova Roma law does not grant you auspicium. Your argument of an implicit power of auspicium with in imperium, based on historical precedent, falls apart upon examination of Roman historical usage of the two terms and Roman practice when exercising these distinct and separate powers. Your performance was a vitium. And your claims are an unprecedented attempt to subvert the auspices and go around them because you found them inconvenient to your schedule. On top of which you then lied about taking auspices for the Comitia Centuriata, and we all know how that ended. And what was your excuse then? You claimed that you wanted to test what my reaction would be when you evaded the auspices as Flaminius had done? Just as you came to claim that your proposals had merely been a test of the resolve of Centuriata to defend the Res Publica. Well, a disater was avoided this time, but your proposals, that a majority of voters saw as an attempt to subvert the basis of the state, came only after you tried to overthrow our religious institutions first. In answer to your "test", you shall not have my support.

Vale


--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Publius Memmius Albucius <albucius_aoe@...> wrote:
>
>
>
> Auguri Moravio s.d.
>
> I take good acknowledgment of your "Responsum augurum de tripudio consularis", though it should rather be an "responsum auguralis" or a "responsum auguris".
>
> On the matter, you did not demonstrate, just because you could not, that the consuls did not own any auspices. For they own them. The augurs were to assist the magistrates, not to replace them. A consul could take his auspices without an augur, but not the contrary.
>
> Second, your reasoning tries to underline the fact that what a fundamental rule in Ancient Rome should not be a fundamental rule in Nova Roma. You provide interesting arguments that might however be reversed or opposed. Your main argument - that the consuls would be given just imperium, and not auspicium - is not admissible. For if I were to carry on a debate with you, I could oppose to it that, if all the characteristics (auspicium, potestas, administrative power, etc.) other than imperium were thus refused to the consuls, just because they have not been quoted explicitly, then our State would not really be a Roman one. In fact, the expression "magistrates with imperium" is just a periphrasis, another way to design our highest magistrates.
>
> We cannot going on pretending having one thing and its contrary, here being the true heirs of Ancient Rome, while just keeping from our Ancients what, according our various sensitivities or political commitments, would sound better for us. If we have consuls, they do own the power of auspices, and its exercise cannot be challenged nor its validation submitted to any technical control. Augurs are assistants to magistrates and not the contrary.
>
> I will not notice your remark on the personal and political cost of my position, for I think that it is inappropriate in a responsa which is supposed to issue a technical augural opinion.
>
> I will just re-assess what I proposed when entering in office in January: that the religious colleges may begin to work, when necessary with the magistrates, so that the Religio Romana be better known, practiced by our officers, magistrates and citizens. The work is still to do. As I have already told you, there are many proceedings, Latin translations, etc. to be checked and corrected among, inter alia, the current augural tools. We officers, magistrates and citizens need assistance, information, pedagogical tools.
>
> I know that you have already begun, these last days, working on new augural texts, that you have submitted to the Collegium Augurum. I hope that these texts will draw the consequence of the present episod and, renouncing ruling on the other constitutional powers' field (Senate, magistrates, etc.), that they will improve our common tools for a better daily practice of the Religio Romana. You will then have my full support.
>
>
>
> Vale,
>
>
>
>
>
> Albucius cos.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Installez gratuitement les nouvelles Emoch'ticones !
> http://www.ilovemessenger.fr/emoticones/telecharger-emoticones-emochticones.aspx
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75840 From: Cato Date: 2010-05-16
Subject: Re: "Responsum augurum de tripudio consularis"
Cato Piscino PM Memmio consule Caesari omnibusque in foro SPD

Although I understand the logic behind your argument, Piscinus, I must disagree to a great extent, and the scholarship is found in Smith's Dictionary, under "Augur, Augurium":

"The latter [auspicia publica, or public auspices] could only be taken by the persons who represented the state, and who acted as mediators between the gods and the state; for though all the patricians were eligible for taking the auspices, yet it was only the magistrates who were in actual possession of them. As long as there were any patrician magistrates, the auspices were exclusively in their hands; on their entrance upon office, they received the auspices (accipiebant auspicia, Cic. de Div. II.36); while their office lasted, they were in possession of them (habebant or erant eorum auspicia, Gell. XIII.15); and at the expiration of their office, they laid them down (ponebant or deponebant auspicia, Cic. de Nat. Deor. II.3). In case, however, there was no patrician magistrate, the auspices became vested in the whole body of the patricians, which was expressed by the words auspicia ad patres redeunt (Cic. Brut. 5, de Nat. Deor. II.3)...

They [the augurs] were not in possession of the auspices themselves, though they understood them better than the magistrates; the lightning and the birds were not sent to them but to the magistrates; they discharged no independent functions either political or ecclesiastical, and are therefore described by Cicero as privati (De Divin. I.40). As the augurs were therefore merely the assistants of the magistrates, they could not take the auspices without the latter, though the magistrates on the contrary could dispense with their assistance, as must frequently have happened in the appointment of a dictator by the consul on military expeditions at a distance from the city. At the same time it must be borne in mind, that as the augurs were the interpreters of the science, they possessed the right of declaring whether the auspices were valid or invalid, and that too whether they were present or not at the time of taking them; and whoever questioned their decision was liable to severe punishment (Cic. de Leg. II.8). They thus possessed in reality a veto upon every important public transaction. It was this power which made the office an object of ambition to the most distinguished men at Rome, and which led Cicero, himself an augur, to describe it as the highest dignity in the state (de Leg. II.12). The augurs frequently employed this power as a political engine to vitiate the election of such parties as were unfavourable to the exclusive privileges of the patricians (Liv. VI.27, VIII.23).

But although the augurs could declare that there was some fault in the auspices, yet, on the other hand, they could not, in favour of their office, declare that any unfavourable sign had appeared to them, since it was not to them that the auspices were sent. Thus we are told that the augurs did not possess the spectio, that is, the right of taking the state-auspices. This spectio, of which we have already briefly spoken, was of two kinds, one more extensive and the other more limited. In the one case the person, who exercised it, could put a stop to the proceedings of any other magistrate by his obnuntiatio: this was called spectio et nuntiatio (perhaps also spectio cum nuntiatione), and belonged only to the highest magistrates, the consuls, dictators, interreges, and, with some modifications, to the praetors. In the other case, the person who took the causes only exercised the spectio in reference to the duties of his own office, and could not interfere with any other magistrate: this was called spectio sine nuntiatione, and belonged to the other magistrates, the censors, aediles, and quaestors. Now as the augurs did not possess the auspices, they consequently could not possess the spectio (habere spectionem); but as the augurs were constantly employed by the magistrates to take the auspices, they exercised the spectio, though they did not possess it in virtue of their office. When they were employed by the magistrates in taking the auspices, they possessed the right of nuntiatio, and thus had the power, by the declaration of unfavourable signs (obnuntiatio), to put a stop to all important public transactions (Cic. de Leg. II.12). In this way we are able to understand the assertion of Cicero (Philipp. II.32), that the augurs possessed the nuntiatio, the consuls and other (higher) magistrates both the spectio and nuntiatio; though it must, at the same time, be borne in mind that this right of nuntiatio only belonged to them in consequence of their being employed by the magistrates. (Respecting the passage of Festus, s.v. spectio, which seems to teach a different doctrine, see Rubino, p58).

The auspices belonging to the different magistrates were divided into two classes, called auspicia maxima or majora and minora. The former, which belonged originally to the kings, passed over to the consuls on the institution of the republic, and likewise to the extraordinary magistrates, the dictators, interreges, and consular tribunes. When the consuls were deprived in course of time of part of their duties, and separate magistrates were created to discharge them, they naturally received the auspicia majora also; this was the case with the censors and praetors. The quaestors and the curule aediles, on the contrary, had only the auspicia minora, because they received them from the consuls and praetors of the year, and their auspices were derived from the majora of the higher magistrates (Messalla, ap. Gell. XIII.15)."

Valete,

Cato
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75841 From: rory12001 Date: 2010-05-16
Subject: Re: "Responsum augurum de tripudio consularis"
M. Hortensia omnibus spd;
Smith's Dictionary was written in the Victorian era. No serious scholar would ever refer to it. It's methodology, archeology, cultural references and scholarship have all been superseded.
J.Linderski has written the seminal monograph on augural law, which can be found in ANRW II, 16, 3.
I suggest if anyone is interested in augury, go to the excellent list here: scroll down to Religion and Law.
http://www.novaroma.org/nr/Reading_list_for_the_cultus_deorum
optime vale
M. Hortensia Maior

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Cato" <catoinnyc@...> wrote:
>
> Cato Piscino PM Memmio consule Caesari omnibusque in foro SPD
>
> Although I understand the logic behind your argument, Piscinus, I must disagree to a great extent, and the scholarship is found in Smith's Dictionary, under "Augur, Augurium":
>
> "The latter [auspicia publica, or public auspices] could only be taken by the persons who represented the state, and who acted as mediators between the gods and the state; for though all the patricians were eligible for taking the auspices, yet it was only the magistrates who were in actual possession of them. As long as there were any patrician magistrates, the auspices were exclusively in their hands; on their entrance upon office, they received the auspices (accipiebant auspicia, Cic. de Div. II.36); while their office lasted, they were in possession of them (habebant or erant eorum auspicia, Gell. XIII.15); and at the expiration of their office, they laid them down (ponebant or deponebant auspicia, Cic. de Nat. Deor. II.3). In case, however, there was no patrician magistrate, the auspices became vested in the whole body of the patricians, which was expressed by the words auspicia ad patres redeunt (Cic. Brut. 5, de Nat. Deor. II.3)...
>
> They [the augurs] were not in possession of the auspices themselves, though they understood them better than the magistrates; the lightning and the birds were not sent to them but to the magistrates; they discharged no independent functions either political or ecclesiastical, and are therefore described by Cicero as privati (De Divin. I.40). As the augurs were therefore merely the assistants of the magistrates, they could not take the auspices without the latter, though the magistrates on the contrary could dispense with their assistance, as must frequently have happened in the appointment of a dictator by the consul on military expeditions at a distance from the city. At the same time it must be borne in mind, that as the augurs were the interpreters of the science, they possessed the right of declaring whether the auspices were valid or invalid, and that too whether they were present or not at the time of taking them; and whoever questioned their decision was liable to severe punishment (Cic. de Leg. II.8). They thus possessed in reality a veto upon every important public transaction. It was this power which made the office an object of ambition to the most distinguished men at Rome, and which led Cicero, himself an augur, to describe it as the highest dignity in the state (de Leg. II.12). The augurs frequently employed this power as a political engine to vitiate the election of such parties as were unfavourable to the exclusive privileges of the patricians (Liv. VI.27, VIII.23).
>
> But although the augurs could declare that there was some fault in the auspices, yet, on the other hand, they could not, in favour of their office, declare that any unfavourable sign had appeared to them, since it was not to them that the auspices were sent. Thus we are told that the augurs did not possess the spectio, that is, the right of taking the state-auspices. This spectio, of which we have already briefly spoken, was of two kinds, one more extensive and the other more limited. In the one case the person, who exercised it, could put a stop to the proceedings of any other magistrate by his obnuntiatio: this was called spectio et nuntiatio (perhaps also spectio cum nuntiatione), and belonged only to the highest magistrates, the consuls, dictators, interreges, and, with some modifications, to the praetors. In the other case, the person who took the causes only exercised the spectio in reference to the duties of his own office, and could not interfere with any other magistrate: this was called spectio sine nuntiatione, and belonged to the other magistrates, the censors, aediles, and quaestors. Now as the augurs did not possess the auspices, they consequently could not possess the spectio (habere spectionem); but as the augurs were constantly employed by the magistrates to take the auspices, they exercised the spectio, though they did not possess it in virtue of their office. When they were employed by the magistrates in taking the auspices, they possessed the right of nuntiatio, and thus had the power, by the declaration of unfavourable signs (obnuntiatio), to put a stop to all important public transactions (Cic. de Leg. II.12). In this way we are able to understand the assertion of Cicero (Philipp. II.32), that the augurs possessed the nuntiatio, the consuls and other (higher) magistrates both the spectio and nuntiatio; though it must, at the same time, be borne in mind that this right of nuntiatio only belonged to them in consequence of their being employed by the magistrates. (Respecting the passage of Festus, s.v. spectio, which seems to teach a different doctrine, see Rubino, p58).
>
> The auspices belonging to the different magistrates were divided into two classes, called auspicia maxima or majora and minora. The former, which belonged originally to the kings, passed over to the consuls on the institution of the republic, and likewise to the extraordinary magistrates, the dictators, interreges, and consular tribunes. When the consuls were deprived in course of time of part of their duties, and separate magistrates were created to discharge them, they naturally received the auspicia majora also; this was the case with the censors and praetors. The quaestors and the curule aediles, on the contrary, had only the auspicia minora, because they received them from the consuls and praetors of the year, and their auspices were derived from the majora of the higher magistrates (Messalla, ap. Gell. XIII.15)."
>
> Valete,
>
> Cato
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75842 From: Cato Date: 2010-05-16
Subject: Re: "Responsum augurum de tripudio consularis"
Cato Maiori sal.

And yet your articles in our Wiki pages refer to it constantly.

Vale,

Cato


--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "rory12001" <rory12001@...> wrote:
>
> M. Hortensia omnibus spd;
> Smith's Dictionary was written in the Victorian era. No serious scholar would ever refer to it.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75843 From: marcus.lucretius Date: 2010-05-16
Subject: Re: "Responsum augurum de tripudio consularis"
--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Cato" <catoinnyc@...> wrote:
>
> Cato Piscino PM Memmio consule Caesari omnibusque in foro SPD
>
> Although I understand the logic behind your argument, Piscinus, I must disagree to a great extent, and the scholarship is found in Smith's Dictionary, under "Augur, Augurium":
>

Agricola Catoni Omnibusque SPD

Smith's is not a reliable source on this topic. Smith's in general is handy for citations into the primary literature, and sometimes is useful on certain topics, especially as it is so accessible. I used it twice recently in the article on divination, once for a nice quote and once for an indirect citation to a very early reference on a point that everyone still agrees on, but the bulk of the article is based on Scheid. I'm now working through some Linderski articles, I'm going to re-read Beard and I'm just finishing Vaahtera. If I had to recommend just one, I'd say look at Scheid. Very readable, affordable and far more up to date than Smith's. The Vaahtera is expensive and most useful to those with good Latin and some Greek, but contains some really interesting discussion.

optime vale, et valete bene
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75844 From: Cato Date: 2010-05-16
Subject: Re: "Responsum augurum de tripudio consularis"
Cato Agricolae sal.

Upon what authorities do you base the assertion that Smith's is not reliable on this subject? Does Lindersky - or Scheid - differ in any substantial way(s) on the subject? If so, in what way(s)?

Vale,

Cato



--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "marcus.lucretius" <marcus.lucretius@...> wrote:
>
>
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Cato" <catoinnyc@> wrote:
> >
> > Cato Piscino PM Memmio consule Caesari omnibusque in foro SPD
> >
> > Although I understand the logic behind your argument, Piscinus, I must disagree to a great extent, and the scholarship is found in Smith's Dictionary, under "Augur, Augurium":
> >
>
> Agricola Catoni Omnibusque SPD
>
> Smith's is not a reliable source on this topic. Smith's in general is handy for citations into the primary literature, and sometimes is useful on certain topics, especially as it is so accessible. I used it twice recently in the article on divination, once for a nice quote and once for an indirect citation to a very early reference on a point that everyone still agrees on, but the bulk of the article is based on Scheid. I'm now working through some Linderski articles, I'm going to re-read Beard and I'm just finishing Vaahtera. If I had to recommend just one, I'd say look at Scheid. Very readable, affordable and far more up to date than Smith's. The Vaahtera is expensive and most useful to those with good Latin and some Greek, but contains some really interesting discussion.
>
> optime vale, et valete bene
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75845 From: L. Livia Plauta Date: 2010-05-16
Subject: Re: [ReligioRomana] The Drowning of the Dummies and one hungry fish.
Salve Messallina,
thanks a lot for the ceremony. It definitely looks as if it was successful!
Sometimes I envy you for living near the sea ...

Optime vale,
Livia

----- Original Message -----
From: "Maxima Valeria Messallina" <maximavaleriamessallina@...>
To: <ReligioRomana@yahoogroups.com>; <Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Saturday, May 15, 2010 8:42 PM
Subject: [ReligioRomana] The Drowning of the Dummies and one hungry fish...




Maxima Valeria Messallina omnibus S.P.D.


Yesterday, May the 14th, was the day in ancient Rome when a procession
carrying the argei round the shrines took place, probably counterwise. The
procession included the Flamen Dialis, Flaminica, Vestal Virgins and the
praetor urbanus. The procession culminated at the river Tiber, when 30 (or
27) effigies were thrown into the river by the Vestal Virgins from the
Bridge of Sublicius.
Argei were bundles of rushes resembling people bound hand and foot. Also
known as the Drowning of the Dummies, this ritual was an act of purification
from all the evils of the year, which the argei personified.
I performed this ritual yesterday. Before sunrise, I placed the two argei
before the Sacred Flame, one dummy representing the male and one dummy
representing the female. (I make them using bulrushes and it takes me about
a week to do both. I imagine that the ancient Vestals spent longer than a
week to make 27 or 30 of these effigies.)
I offered prayers that all Nova Romans and their loved ones (pets included)
be shielded from all evils. Then I bound the argei's hands and feets
according to tradition.
It was foggy and a chilly 50 F (10 C). In my Vestal clothes, I went alone to
the beach, which is just a short walk from my house. It was 5:15 a.m. and I
encountered no one along the way. I waded into the ocean until I was chest
deep but still able to hold my arms above the water. I held up the argei,
one in either hand and after another prayer that this sacrifice would be
accepted, I threw them in.
I waited to see if the waves brought the argei back when the most
extraordinary thing happened. A rather large fish jumped up out of the water
on my right side. It was no more than a foot away from me. Startled the heck
out of me, but it was a good thing I was looking to my right when the fish
jumped out or I don't think I would have seen that it had one of the argei
in its mouth. It did happen quite quickly, but I nevertheless saw the feet
of the dummy sticking out of the fish's mouth! I was stunned.
Now, when I had been saying the prayer, I did feel fish swimming by my legs,
but that is not uncommon in these waters were commerical fishing still
thrives and lots of local people fish along the beach as well as on the
pier.
I couldn't stand the cold anymore and I got out of the water and went home
to change out of my wet clothes. I returned promptly to the beach and walked
the full length of the seashore checking to see if the second dummy had
washed ashore. It did not. I concluded that it either went out to sea or
another fish got it.
By this time, there were plenty of fishermen on the beach and I described to
one of them the fish I had seen - about three feet long (60 centimeters) and
red. He said it sounded like it was a female Sheephead and he told me that
kind of fish has strong jaws and feeds on urchins and shellfish. So I guess
to that hungry fish, the argei must have seemed a good, crunchy treat. : )

Valete bene in pace Deorum,

Maxima Valeria Messallina
Sacerdos Vestalis
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75846 From: iulius sabinus Date: 2010-05-16
Subject: Re: Results of the Senate Meeting of April 2763 auc.
SALVE VENATOR!
 
I noticed your desire to serve again. Censors will take it in consideration after this year census which will be organized after the tax payment deadline in June.
 
VALE BENE,
T. Iulius Sabinus

"Every individual is the architect of his own fortune" - Appius Claudius

--- On Sat, 5/15/10, Publius Ullerius Stephanus Venator <famila.ulleria.venii@...> wrote:


From: Publius Ullerius Stephanus Venator <famila.ulleria.venii@...>
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Results of the Senate Meeting of April 2763 auc.
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Date: Saturday, May 15, 2010, 2:53 AM


 



Salve Messalina;

Thank you for the report of the Senate votes, but one minor
correction...I am no longer a Senator, so I could not have voted,
regardless.

I resigned earlier this year in the circumstances surrounding my
father's terminal illness and passing. I'll take it as a compliment
that you still think me Senatorial material.

If the censors failed to de-list me, I feel able to serve again and
would be willing to participate. I am still here, to help our People
and the Republic.

in amicitia - Venator










[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75847 From: Publius Ullerius Stephanus Venator Date: 2010-05-16
Subject: Re: Results of the Senate Meeting of April 2763 auc.
Salve Honored Sabinus, Censor;

On Sun, May 16, 2010 at 2:12 PM, iulius sabinus wrote:
>
> SALVE VENATOR!
>
> I noticed your desire to serve again. Censors will take it in consideration after this year census which will be organized after the tax payment deadline in June.
>
> VALE BENE,
> T. Iulius Sabinus
>

I thank you kindly. If I may be of service, I shall, indeed serve.
But, please, no earlier than the Kalends of Augustus.

In amicitia et fides - Venator
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75848 From: L. Livia Plauta Date: 2010-05-16
Subject: Re: Results of the Senate Meeting of April 2763 auc.
Salve Messallina,
thank you for the report, but a few days ago Dexter was complaining that the
last senate session had 17 items, and here I see only two. Or am I confusing
it with another senate session?

Optime vale,
Livia


----- Original Message -----
From: "Maxima Valeria Messallina" <maximavaleriamessallina@...>
To: <ComitiaPlebisTributa@yahoogroups.com>; <Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Friday, May 14, 2010 5:23 PM
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Results of the Senate Meeting of April 2763 auc.


Tribunae Plebis Maximae Valeriae Messallinae Quiritibus S.P.D.

Citizens of Nova Roma,

Here is the Tribunician report of the Senate session of April 24 to May 7,
2763. The votes have been tallied and the results are as follows:


The Senate was called into session at 6:00 hours, Rome time (12:00 a.m. EDT)
on a.d. VIII Kal. Mai., Saturday, April 24, 2763 auc. and discussions
continued until 24:00 hours, Rome time (6:00 p.m. EDT). A recess was called
due to April 25th being Robigalia and dies nefastus publicus. Discussions
were resumed at 6:00 hours, Rome time (12:00 a.m. EDT) on a.d. VI Kal. Mai.,
Monday, April 26, 2763 and continued until 24.00 hours, Rome time (6:00 p.m.
EDT), pr. Kal. Mai., Friday, April 30th. A second recess was called due to
May 1st being Floralia and May 2nd being dies ateri.

Voting on the Agenda began at 6:00 hours, Rome time (12:00 a.m. EDT) on a.d.
V Non. Mai., Monday, May 3, 2763 and concluded at 18:00 hours, Rome time,
(12:00 p.m. EDT) on Non. Mai., Friday, May 7, 2763 auc.


The following XX Senators cast their votes on time. They are referred to by
their initials which are listed in alphabetical order (with the exception of
the presiding magistrate who will be listed first):


*KFBQ: K. Fabius Buteo Quintilianus – Presiding Magistrate

*ATS: A. Tullia Scholastica
*CCS: C. Curius Saturninus
*CFD: C. Flavius Diocletianus
*CnEM: Cn. Equitius Marinus
*CnIC: Cn. Iulius Caesar
*EqIL: Equestria Iunia Laeca
*KFBM: K. Fabius Buteo Modianus
*MAM: M. Arminius Maior
*MHM: M. Hortensia Maior
*MIP: M. Iulius Perusianus
*MLA: M. Lucretius Agricola
*MMA M. Minucius Audens
*MMPH: M. Moravius Piscinus Horatianus
*PMA: P. Memmius Albucius
*QFM: Q. Fabius Maximus
*QSP: Q. Suetonius Paulinus
*TiGPTi.: Ti. Galerius Paulinus
*TIS: T. Iulius Sabinus


One Senator voted by proxy:
*LCSF: L. Cornelius Sulla Felix (Proxy vote delivered by Cn. Iulius Caesar)


One Senator's vote arrived too late:
*CEC: C. Equitius Cato

The following Senatores (XI) did not vote:
*ArnMA: Arn. Moravia Aurelia
*CMM: C. Marius Merullus
*CVP: C. Vipsanius Agrippa
*DIPI: Dec. Iunius Palladius Invictus
*EmCF: Em. Curia Finnica
*FAC: Fr. Apulus Caesar
*FGA: Fl. Galerius Aurelianus
*MCC: M. Curiatius Complutensis
*MIS: M. Iulius Severus
*PVSV: P. Ullerius Stephanus Venator

_____________________________________________

"VTI ROGAS" indicates a vote in favor of an item,
"ANTIQVO" is a vote against,
"ABSTINEO" is an open abstention.
_____________________________________________



ITEM I – Decision about a possible public advertisement outside of Nova Roma
or
a Nova Roman ad on the main list to get someone for the IT job. Discussion +
voting.

The Senatores were asked to vote on Option 1 and/or Option 2. Option 1 was
for placing an advertisement on our mailing list to try to find a cheaper
solution. Option 2 was to try and find an outside programmer.

Item I - Option 1:
Vti Rogas - 20
Antiqvo - 0
Abstineo - 0

The result of the voting is Item I - Option 1 PASSED.

Item I - Option 2:
Vti rogas - 0
Antiqvo - 15
Astineo - 1

The result of the voting is Item I - Option 2 FAILED.

*KFBQ: I.1 Vti rogas, I.2 Antiqvo.
*ATS: I.1 Vti rogas, I.2 Antiqvo. On Option 1 - "The website might also be a
good place for this." On Option 2 - "Let us try Option A (or 1, though
correct outlining follows the Roman numeral with a capital letter) first.
Even among my students there are several who are involved in IT."
*CCS: I.1 Vti rogas, I.2 Antiqvo.
*CFD: I.1 Vti rogas, I.2 Antiqvo.
*CnEM: I.1 Vti rogas.
*CnIC: I.1 Vti rogas, I.2 Antiqvo. On Option 2 - "We need to explore the
possibly cheaper options, and examine the abilities, qualifications and
references of those on the Main List who believe they can handle the task."
*EqIL: I.1 Vti rogas.
*KFBM: I.1 Vti rogas.
*LCSF: I.1 Vti rogas, I.2 Antiqvo.
*MAM: I.1 Vti rogas.
*MHM: I.1 Vti rogas, I.2 Antiqvo.
*MIP: I.1 Vti rogas, I.2 Antiqvo.
*MLA: I.1 Vti rogas, I.2 Antiqvo. On Option 2 - "Better to try option 1
before going to option 2."
*MMA: I.1 Vti rogas.
*MMPH: I.1 Vti rogas, I.2 Antiqvo. On Option 2 - "This option would prove
costly and leave less funds available to do the work needed. Better to try
option 1 before going to option 2."
*PMA: I.1 Vti rogas, I.2 Abstineo. On Option 2 - "As the sub-item is
written, it may be believed that both solutions are incompatible. But, if a
first call "on the mailing list" cannot help us finding the appropriate
candidate, we will have to find a programmer "outside"."
*QFM: I.1 Vti rogas, I.2 Antiqvo. On Option 1 - "Members here would be the
first choice since they know how Nova Roma works. They already know the
requirements the new program needs." On Option 2 - "An outside designer will
be pricey. We all know programmers, we deal with them daily in our mundane
life. Let's ask around."
*QSP: I.1 Vti rogas, I.2 Antiqvo. On Option 2 - "An outside designer will be
costly and I agree with QFM."
*TiGPTi.: I.1 Vti rogas, I.2 Antiqvo.
*TIS: I.1 Vti rogas, I.2 Antiqvo. On Option 1 - "Our members have priority.
They know how the things are going on in Nova Roma and understand which are
the requirements and expectations from the program or system they must
create." On Option 2 - "That is an option only if the first don't work."


_____________________________________________________________


ITEM II – Appointment of a Central Financial Officer (CFO). Names will be
sent
to the Senate in time for the contio if at all possible. Discussion +
voting.

*Attention Citizens: there is a special note regarding the vote on Item II
at the end of this report.*

The Senate was asked to vote on keeping Equestria Iunia Laeca as the CFO for
Nova Roma for an extended period from May 8, 2763 auc., to September 30,
2763 auc., during which time a new CFO would be found or another reasonable
solution to the handling of the finances of Nova Roma.


Item II
Vti Rogas - 18
Antiqvo - 0
Abstineo - 1

The result of the voting is Item II PASSED.

*KFBQ: Vti rogas.
*ATS: Vti rogas. "She has done a fine job amid considerable difficulties. "
*CCS: Vti rogas.
*CFD: Vti rogas.
*CnEM: Vti rogas.
*CnIC: Vti rogas.
*EqIL: Vti rogas. "The correct title should be Chief Financial Officer,
not Central Financial Officer."
*KFBM: Vti rogas.
*LCSF: Abstineo.
*MAM: Vti rogas.
*MHM: Vti rogas. "I admire and respect our CFO who has done so much to put
Nova Roma's financial house in order, I hope the newly returned G. Popillius
Laenas, who is an accountant will help & assume this burden."
*MIP: Vti rogas.
*MLA: Vti rogas. "I cannot agree more with the praise already given to
Equestria Iunia. Her performance and dedication have been exemplary. Her
work has been one of the best things that has happened in a long time and it
will continue to benefit us all in the years to come."
*MMA: Vti rogas.
*MMPH: Vti rogas. "Equestria Iunia has performed in a most exempliary and
professional manner. All Nova Romans should offer her their thanks for the
benefit she has provided to Nova Roman by her placing our finances on a more
stable and secure footing, and for providing us with a system that allows
accountability, improved financial reporting, and better budgeting. She
deserves our thanks, and she deserves a respite from the duties she has
performed so admirably over the past years."
*QFM: Vti rogas.
*QSP: Vti rogas.
*TiGPTi.: Vti rogas. "I want to say thank you to Equestria Iunia Laeca for
her outstanding service in a thankless position. She has done a superlative
job. Her dedication is unmatched, her integrity untouchable, her performance
outstanding, her attention to detail exceptional and her over all demeanor
that of a consummate professional. Well done madam!"
*TIS: Vti rogas.

______________________________________________________


ITEM III – This Item was tabled. No discussion or vote.

_____________________________________________________


ITEM IV - Information about the Conventus in Rome from a.d. XV Kal. Quint.,
June 17, 2763 auc., to a.d. XI Kal. Quint., June 21, 2763 auc. Discussion
only, no vote.

No information was presented about this Item, thus there was no discussion
and no comments to be included in this report.

____________________________________________________



*Special note concerning the vote on Item II.

Citizens,

On May 7 at 16:04 hours, Rome time, Consul Albucius voted on Item I, but on
Item II, the Consul vetoed the vote. (Message# 16947 on the Senatus Romanus
list).

Here are Consul Albucius' comments exactly as he posted them along with his
veto:



"Item II - NO VOTE, for VETO on the period from June 20th to Sept. 30th.

Comments:

In Jan. 2761 auc, the consuls proposed the Senate the creation of an office
of Chief Financial Officer. This office was to last two years, until last
March 1st.. Hon. Iunia Laeca was, in the same senatus consultum, appointed
as this CFO. In November 2761, Hon.Iunia was granted by the senate special
century points for her service.


At this time, I had told my disagreement towards creating such CFO position,
as long as we will not have solved the question of the relation between our
Roman magistracies and offices and the positions that we would need in the
frame of our association, NR Inc., under national laws.

My position as a consul is the same that my position, two years ago, as a
senator, and is a fortiori confirmed by the last debate on the constitution
preamble debate: if we intend to remain close to Roman principles and
specially the organization of a Roman State, there is no place for a CF
office for the Res publica has financial quaestors.

If on the contrary we consider that the external environment obliges us to
be organized, at least for a few points, like an association, we may
consider that such positions are required. We have the same difficulty for
every technical position which did not exist in Ancient Rome, like for
example the C.I.O. and the Magister aranearius ones.


Whatever the choice we do, we must be coherent and assume it.


Hon. Iunia's term has ended on last March 1st, at the natural time set by
the senate, and in a context where Iunia's availabilities did not allow her
taking part to the preparation of the Budget 2763 auc.

It was then, when a draft for new bylaws had been issued, the time to open
from March on til now, a coherent and timely thinking and debate on this
point. This is why, taking also in consideration Iunia's uneasy
availability, I did not propose the Senate to prorogue the CFO's term,
whoever the civis be in charge of it.


If the management of Nova Roma finances requires the utmost attention, it is
not good policy to delay month after month decisions on the matter, and be
obliged, by the calendar to prorogue by default a situation.


I am well conscious of the efforts of my colleague in order to have filled
the CFoffice as soon as possible. I am grateful that Laeca could find new
time to care about NR finances.

My second difficulty, in addition of the position evoked above, is that the
consuls agreed in Sweden on a preliminary consultation; at the end of this
consultation, a joint point would be made, and the way how to consult the
senate would be decided at this time. By proposing Hon. Iunia a prorogation,
my colleague has leaped over this step, despite my observations of last a.d.
III Kal. Maias.


As I am sure that my dear colleague Quintilianus has acted with good will
and faith, I have decided not to oppose his whole proposal, for we agree on
the essential things, but just to veto it on the period going from June 20th
on to September 30th. This will allow us to assume our financial priorities
(the receipt of the annual taxes, the preparation of the meeting organized
by my colleague in Rome, the first expenses on the IT Project, and to set
some financial moves), and to boost the examination of the NR Inc. Bylaws,
which we should has discussed sooner.

The present veto is naturally worth of a consular edict, issued on this day
and hour, interceding on the item II, as worded above, currently presented
by my colleague. It allows the normal application of the Item II, specially
if approved, from May 8th to June 20th, and does not for the period from
June 21st to Sept. 30th."

(end of comments)
____________________________________________________


Upon closer inspection of this unexpected and unprecedented action, I, as
Tribuna Plebis, post the following to the Senatus Romanus list in response:


"From: Maxima Valeria Messallina <maximavaleriamessallina@...>
Subject: [SenatusRomanus] Intercessio
To: senatusromanus@yahoogroups.com, Tribunes@yahoogroups.com
Date: Sunday, May 9, 2010, 9:41 PM













Ex Officio Tribuna Plebis Maxima Valeria Messallina Senatui


I, Maxima Valeria Messallina, Tribuna Plebis, hereby do pronounce
intercessio against the veto of Consul P. Memmius Albucius given on May 7,
2763 auc., at 16:04 hours, Rome time, to the vote on Item II of the Senate's
agenda. Upon closer inspection of this unexpected and unprecedented action,
I issue this counter-veto for the following reasons:

The Constitution of Nova Roma states about the consules (2,d) that they may
"pronounce intercessio (intercession; a veto) against another consul or
magistrate of lesser authority.." Therefore, a consul may veto the actions
of another consul or magistrate, but there is nothing in our Constitution
that states a consul may veto the collective decision of the Senate or any
of the Comitia. The law is implicit in its limits on a consul's actions.

Consul Albucius could have vetoed the proposed item when it was placed for
discussion, but he took no such action at the proper time. Once a vote was
called on said item, it was too late.

Also, as per Article V of our Constitution "The supreme policy-making
authority for Nova Roma shall be embodied in its Senate" and not in a
consul. And as per Article IV, 7a, which states:




"To pronounce intercessio (intercession; a veto) against the actions of any
other magistrate (with the exception of the dictator and the interrex),
Senatus consulta, magisterial edicta, religious decreta, and leges passed by
the comitia when the spirit and /or letter of this Constitution or
legally-enacted edicta or decreta, Senatus Consulta or leges are being
violated thereby;"

As a Tribune, I feel strongly that the veto of Consul Albucius violates the
spirit, if not the letter of the law, because the full Senate is neither a
consul nor a lesser magistrate.





Valete bene in pace Deorum,

Maxima Valeria Messallina
Tribuna Plebis"


Tribuni Plebis C. Curius Saturninus, C. Petronius Dexter, and M. Octavius
Corvus supported the intercessio.


On May 10, 2763 auc., at 11:58 hours, Rome time, Consul Albucius informed
Consul Quintilianus that he was withdrawing his veto. Therefore, no vote is
shown for Consul Albucius on Item II.

_________________________________________________________

Tribuni Plebis:

Maxima Valeria Messallina (reporting)
C. Curius Saturninus
C. Petronius Dexter
M. Octavius Corvus
C. Aquilius Rota

Valete bene in pace Deorum,

Maxima Valeria Messallina
Tribuna Plebis




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75849 From: Maxima Valeria Messallina Date: 2010-05-16
Subject: Re: Results of the Senate Meeting of April 2763 auc.
Salve, Livia
 
There were 15 items on the agenda of the March Senate Meeting, to which Dexter was the reporting Tribune. I don't how 15 got changed into 17, but on this list, I'm not surprised. LOL
Dexter already posted his report of the March session, but Metellus asked for additional information on certain items on Dexter's report. Dexter will post that additional information to the CPT list as soon as he can.
I was the reporting Tribune for the April Senate Meeting, which had four items, but only two had voting. I hope that clears everything up.
 
Vale bene,
 
Maxima Valeria Messallina
 
 


<<--- On Sun, 5/16/10, L. Livia Plauta <livia.plauta@...> wrote:

Salve Messallina,
thank you for the report, but a few days ago Dexter was complaining that the
last senate session had 17 items, and here I see only two. Or am I confusing
it with another senate session?

Optime vale,
Livia>>




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75850 From: rory12001 Date: 2010-05-16
Subject: Re: Results of the Senate Meeting of April 2763 auc.
Salve Livia;
the giant 17 item session was called last month by Albucius, with the subsequent comitia vote.
This month's session was called by Quintillianus with just 2 items.
optime vale
Maior

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "L. Livia Plauta" <livia.plauta@...> wrote:
>
> Salve Messallina,
> thank you for the report, but a few days ago Dexter was complaining that the
> last senate session had 17 items, and here I see only two. Or am I confusing
> it with another senate session?
>
> Optime vale,
> Livia
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Maxima Valeria Messallina" <maximavaleriamessallina@>
> To: <ComitiaPlebisTributa@yahoogroups.com>; <Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com>
> Sent: Friday, May 14, 2010 5:23 PM
> Subject: [Nova-Roma] Results of the Senate Meeting of April 2763 auc.
>
>
> Tribunae Plebis Maximae Valeriae Messallinae Quiritibus S.P.D.
>
> Citizens of Nova Roma,
>
> Here is the Tribunician report of the Senate session of April 24 to May 7,
> 2763. The votes have been tallied and the results are as follows:
>
>
> The Senate was called into session at 6:00 hours, Rome time (12:00 a.m. EDT)
> on a.d. VIII Kal. Mai., Saturday, April 24, 2763 auc. and discussions
> continued until 24:00 hours, Rome time (6:00 p.m. EDT). A recess was called
> due to April 25th being Robigalia and dies nefastus publicus. Discussions
> were resumed at 6:00 hours, Rome time (12:00 a.m. EDT) on a.d. VI Kal. Mai.,
> Monday, April 26, 2763 and continued until 24.00 hours, Rome time (6:00 p.m.
> EDT), pr. Kal. Mai., Friday, April 30th. A second recess was called due to
> May 1st being Floralia and May 2nd being dies ateri.
>
> Voting on the Agenda began at 6:00 hours, Rome time (12:00 a.m. EDT) on a.d.
> V Non. Mai., Monday, May 3, 2763 and concluded at 18:00 hours, Rome time,
> (12:00 p.m. EDT) on Non. Mai., Friday, May 7, 2763 auc.
>
>
> The following XX Senators cast their votes on time. They are referred to by
> their initials which are listed in alphabetical order (with the exception of
> the presiding magistrate who will be listed first):
>
>
> *KFBQ: K. Fabius Buteo Quintilianus â€" Presiding Magistrate
>
> *ATS: A. Tullia Scholastica
> *CCS: C. Curius Saturninus
> *CFD: C. Flavius Diocletianus
> *CnEM: Cn. Equitius Marinus
> *CnIC: Cn. Iulius Caesar
> *EqIL: Equestria Iunia Laeca
> *KFBM: K. Fabius Buteo Modianus
> *MAM: M. Arminius Maior
> *MHM: M. Hortensia Maior
> *MIP: M. Iulius Perusianus
> *MLA: M. Lucretius Agricola
> *MMA M. Minucius Audens
> *MMPH: M. Moravius Piscinus Horatianus
> *PMA: P. Memmius Albucius
> *QFM: Q. Fabius Maximus
> *QSP: Q. Suetonius Paulinus
> *TiGPTi.: Ti. Galerius Paulinus
> *TIS: T. Iulius Sabinus
>
>
> One Senator voted by proxy:
> *LCSF: L. Cornelius Sulla Felix (Proxy vote delivered by Cn. Iulius Caesar)
>
>
> One Senator's vote arrived too late:
> *CEC: C. Equitius Cato
>
> The following Senatores (XI) did not vote:
> *ArnMA: Arn. Moravia Aurelia
> *CMM: C. Marius Merullus
> *CVP: C. Vipsanius Agrippa
> *DIPI: Dec. Iunius Palladius Invictus
> *EmCF: Em. Curia Finnica
> *FAC: Fr. Apulus Caesar
> *FGA: Fl. Galerius Aurelianus
> *MCC: M. Curiatius Complutensis
> *MIS: M. Iulius Severus
> *PVSV: P. Ullerius Stephanus Venator
>
> _____________________________________________
>
> "VTI ROGAS" indicates a vote in favor of an item,
> "ANTIQVO" is a vote against,
> "ABSTINEO" is an open abstention.
> _____________________________________________
>
>
>
> ITEM I â€" Decision about a possible public advertisement outside of Nova Roma
> or
> a Nova Roman ad on the main list to get someone for the IT job. Discussion +
> voting.
>
> The Senatores were asked to vote on Option 1 and/or Option 2. Option 1 was
> for placing an advertisement on our mailing list to try to find a cheaper
> solution. Option 2 was to try and find an outside programmer.
>
> Item I - Option 1:
> Vti Rogas - 20
> Antiqvo - 0
> Abstineo - 0
>
> The result of the voting is Item I - Option 1 PASSED.
>
> Item I - Option 2:
> Vti rogas - 0
> Antiqvo - 15
> Astineo - 1
>
> The result of the voting is Item I - Option 2 FAILED.
>
> *KFBQ: I.1 Vti rogas, I.2 Antiqvo.
> *ATS: I.1 Vti rogas, I.2 Antiqvo. On Option 1 - "The website might also be a
> good place for this." On Option 2 - "Let us try Option A (or 1, though
> correct outlining follows the Roman numeral with a capital letter) first.
> Even among my students there are several who are involved in IT."
> *CCS: I.1 Vti rogas, I.2 Antiqvo.
> *CFD: I.1 Vti rogas, I.2 Antiqvo.
> *CnEM: I.1 Vti rogas.
> *CnIC: I.1 Vti rogas, I.2 Antiqvo. On Option 2 - "We need to explore the
> possibly cheaper options, and examine the abilities, qualifications and
> references of those on the Main List who believe they can handle the task."
> *EqIL: I.1 Vti rogas.
> *KFBM: I.1 Vti rogas.
> *LCSF: I.1 Vti rogas, I.2 Antiqvo.
> *MAM: I.1 Vti rogas.
> *MHM: I.1 Vti rogas, I.2 Antiqvo.
> *MIP: I.1 Vti rogas, I.2 Antiqvo.
> *MLA: I.1 Vti rogas, I.2 Antiqvo. On Option 2 - "Better to try option 1
> before going to option 2."
> *MMA: I.1 Vti rogas.
> *MMPH: I.1 Vti rogas, I.2 Antiqvo. On Option 2 - "This option would prove
> costly and leave less funds available to do the work needed. Better to try
> option 1 before going to option 2."
> *PMA: I.1 Vti rogas, I.2 Abstineo. On Option 2 - "As the sub-item is
> written, it may be believed that both solutions are incompatible. But, if a
> first call "on the mailing list" cannot help us finding the appropriate
> candidate, we will have to find a programmer "outside"."
> *QFM: I.1 Vti rogas, I.2 Antiqvo. On Option 1 - "Members here would be the
> first choice since they know how Nova Roma works. They already know the
> requirements the new program needs." On Option 2 - "An outside designer will
> be pricey. We all know programmers, we deal with them daily in our mundane
> life. Let's ask around."
> *QSP: I.1 Vti rogas, I.2 Antiqvo. On Option 2 - "An outside designer will be
> costly and I agree with QFM."
> *TiGPTi.: I.1 Vti rogas, I.2 Antiqvo.
> *TIS: I.1 Vti rogas, I.2 Antiqvo. On Option 1 - "Our members have priority.
> They know how the things are going on in Nova Roma and understand which are
> the requirements and expectations from the program or system they must
> create." On Option 2 - "That is an option only if the first don't work."
>
>
> _____________________________________________________________
>
>
> ITEM II â€" Appointment of a Central Financial Officer (CFO). Names will be
> sent
> to the Senate in time for the contio if at all possible. Discussion +
> voting.
>
> *Attention Citizens: there is a special note regarding the vote on Item II
> at the end of this report.*
>
> The Senate was asked to vote on keeping Equestria Iunia Laeca as the CFO for
> Nova Roma for an extended period from May 8, 2763 auc., to September 30,
> 2763 auc., during which time a new CFO would be found or another reasonable
> solution to the handling of the finances of Nova Roma.
>
>
> Item II
> Vti Rogas - 18
> Antiqvo - 0
> Abstineo - 1
>
> The result of the voting is Item II PASSED.
>
> *KFBQ: Vti rogas.
> *ATS: Vti rogas. "She has done a fine job amid considerable difficulties. "
> *CCS: Vti rogas.
> *CFD: Vti rogas.
> *CnEM: Vti rogas.
> *CnIC: Vti rogas.
> *EqIL: Vti rogas. "The correct title should be Chief Financial Officer,
> not Central Financial Officer."
> *KFBM: Vti rogas.
> *LCSF: Abstineo.
> *MAM: Vti rogas.
> *MHM: Vti rogas. "I admire and respect our CFO who has done so much to put
> Nova Roma's financial house in order, I hope the newly returned G. Popillius
> Laenas, who is an accountant will help & assume this burden."
> *MIP: Vti rogas.
> *MLA: Vti rogas. "I cannot agree more with the praise already given to
> Equestria Iunia. Her performance and dedication have been exemplary. Her
> work has been one of the best things that has happened in a long time and it
> will continue to benefit us all in the years to come."
> *MMA: Vti rogas.
> *MMPH: Vti rogas. "Equestria Iunia has performed in a most exempliary and
> professional manner. All Nova Romans should offer her their thanks for the
> benefit she has provided to Nova Roman by her placing our finances on a more
> stable and secure footing, and for providing us with a system that allows
> accountability, improved financial reporting, and better budgeting. She
> deserves our thanks, and she deserves a respite from the duties she has
> performed so admirably over the past years."
> *QFM: Vti rogas.
> *QSP: Vti rogas.
> *TiGPTi.: Vti rogas. "I want to say thank you to Equestria Iunia Laeca for
> her outstanding service in a thankless position. She has done a superlative
> job. Her dedication is unmatched, her integrity untouchable, her performance
> outstanding, her attention to detail exceptional and her over all demeanor
> that of a consummate professional. Well done madam!"
> *TIS: Vti rogas.
>
> ______________________________________________________
>
>
> ITEM III â€" This Item was tabled. No discussion or vote.
>
> _____________________________________________________
>
>
> ITEM IV - Information about the Conventus in Rome from a.d. XV Kal. Quint.,
> June 17, 2763 auc., to a.d. XI Kal. Quint., June 21, 2763 auc. Discussion
> only, no vote.
>
> No information was presented about this Item, thus there was no discussion
> and no comments to be included in this report.
>
> ____________________________________________________
>
>
>
> *Special note concerning the vote on Item II.
>
> Citizens,
>
> On May 7 at 16:04 hours, Rome time, Consul Albucius voted on Item I, but on
> Item II, the Consul vetoed the vote. (Message# 16947 on the Senatus Romanus
> list).
>
> Here are Consul Albucius' comments exactly as he posted them along with his
> veto:
>
>
>
> "Item II - NO VOTE, for VETO on the period from June 20th to Sept. 30th.
>
> Comments:
>
> In Jan. 2761 auc, the consuls proposed the Senate the creation of an office
> of Chief Financial Officer. This office was to last two years, until last
> March 1st.. Hon. Iunia Laeca was, in the same senatus consultum, appointed
> as this CFO. In November 2761, Hon.Iunia was granted by the senate special
> century points for her service.
>
>
> At this time, I had told my disagreement towards creating such CFO position,
> as long as we will not have solved the question of the relation between our
> Roman magistracies and offices and the positions that we would need in the
> frame of our association, NR Inc., under national laws.
>
> My position as a consul is the same that my position, two years ago, as a
> senator, and is a fortiori confirmed by the last debate on the constitution
> preamble debate: if we intend to remain close to Roman principles and
> specially the organization of a Roman State, there is no place for a CF
> office for the Res publica has financial quaestors.
>
> If on the contrary we consider that the external environment obliges us to
> be organized, at least for a few points, like an association, we may
> consider that such positions are required. We have the same difficulty for
> every technical position which did not exist in Ancient Rome, like for
> example the C.I.O. and the Magister aranearius ones.
>
>
> Whatever the choice we do, we must be coherent and assume it.
>
>
> Hon. Iunia's term has ended on last March 1st, at the natural time set by
> the senate, and in a context where Iunia's availabilities did not allow her
> taking part to the preparation of the Budget 2763 auc.
>
> It was then, when a draft for new bylaws had been issued, the time to open
> from March on til now, a coherent and timely thinking and debate on this
> point. This is why, taking also in consideration Iunia's uneasy
> availability, I did not propose the Senate to prorogue the CFO's term,
> whoever the civis be in charge of it.
>
>
> If the management of Nova Roma finances requires the utmost attention, it is
> not good policy to delay month after month decisions on the matter, and be
> obliged, by the calendar to prorogue by default a situation.
>
>
> I am well conscious of the efforts of my colleague in order to have filled
> the CFoffice as soon as possible. I am grateful that Laeca could find new
> time to care about NR finances.
>
> My second difficulty, in addition of the position evoked above, is that the
> consuls agreed in Sweden on a preliminary consultation; at the end of this
> consultation, a joint point would be made, and the way how to consult the
> senate would be decided at this time. By proposing Hon. Iunia a prorogation,
> my colleague has leaped over this step, despite my observations of last a.d.
> III Kal. Maias.
>
>
> As I am sure that my dear colleague Quintilianus has acted with good will
> and faith, I have decided not to oppose his whole proposal, for we agree on
> the essential things, but just to veto it on the period going from June 20th
> on to September 30th. This will allow us to assume our financial priorities
> (the receipt of the annual taxes, the preparation of the meeting organized
> by my colleague in Rome, the first expenses on the IT Project, and to set
> some financial moves), and to boost the examination of the NR Inc. Bylaws,
> which we should has discussed sooner.
>
> The present veto is naturally worth of a consular edict, issued on this day
> and hour, interceding on the item II, as worded above, currently presented
> by my colleague. It allows the normal application of the Item II, specially
> if approved, from May 8th to June 20th, and does not for the period from
> June 21st to Sept. 30th."
>
> (end of comments)
> ____________________________________________________
>
>
> Upon closer inspection of this unexpected and unprecedented action, I, as
> Tribuna Plebis, post the following to the Senatus Romanus list in response:
>
>
> "From: Maxima Valeria Messallina <maximavaleriamessallina@...>
> Subject: [SenatusRomanus] Intercessio
> To: senatusromanus@yahoogroups.com, Tribunes@yahoogroups.com
> Date: Sunday, May 9, 2010, 9:41 PM
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Ex Officio Tribuna Plebis Maxima Valeria Messallina Senatui
>
>
> I, Maxima Valeria Messallina, Tribuna Plebis, hereby do pronounce
> intercessio against the veto of Consul P. Memmius Albucius given on May 7,
> 2763 auc., at 16:04 hours, Rome time, to the vote on Item II of the Senate's
> agenda. Upon closer inspection of this unexpected and unprecedented action,
> I issue this counter-veto for the following reasons:
>
> The Constitution of Nova Roma states about the consules (2,d) that they may
> "pronounce intercessio (intercession; a veto) against another consul or
> magistrate of lesser authority.." Therefore, a consul may veto the actions
> of another consul or magistrate, but there is nothing in our Constitution
> that states a consul may veto the collective decision of the Senate or any
> of the Comitia. The law is implicit in its limits on a consul's actions.
>
> Consul Albucius could have vetoed the proposed item when it was placed for
> discussion, but he took no such action at the proper time. Once a vote was
> called on said item, it was too late.
>
> Also, as per Article V of our Constitution "The supreme policy-making
> authority for Nova Roma shall be embodied in its Senate" and not in a
> consul. And as per Article IV, 7a, which states:
>
>
>
>
> "To pronounce intercessio (intercession; a veto) against the actions of any
> other magistrate (with the exception of the dictator and the interrex),
> Senatus consulta, magisterial edicta, religious decreta, and leges passed by
> the comitia when the spirit and /or letter of this Constitution or
> legally-enacted edicta or decreta, Senatus Consulta or leges are being
> violated thereby;"
>
> As a Tribune, I feel strongly that the veto of Consul Albucius violates the
> spirit, if not the letter of the law, because the full Senate is neither a
> consul nor a lesser magistrate.
>
>
>
>
>
> Valete bene in pace Deorum,
>
> Maxima Valeria Messallina
> Tribuna Plebis"
>
>
> Tribuni Plebis C. Curius Saturninus, C. Petronius Dexter, and M. Octavius
> Corvus supported the intercessio.
>
>
> On May 10, 2763 auc., at 11:58 hours, Rome time, Consul Albucius informed
> Consul Quintilianus that he was withdrawing his veto. Therefore, no vote is
> shown for Consul Albucius on Item II.
>
> _________________________________________________________
>
> Tribuni Plebis:
>
> Maxima Valeria Messallina (reporting)
> C. Curius Saturninus
> C. Petronius Dexter
> M. Octavius Corvus
> C. Aquilius Rota
>
> Valete bene in pace Deorum,
>
> Maxima Valeria Messallina
> Tribuna Plebis
>
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75851 From: petronius_dexter Date: 2010-05-16
Subject: Re: Results of the Senate Meeting of April 2763 auc.
C. Petronius Liviae s.p.d.,

> thank you for the report, but a few days ago Dexter was complaining that the last senate session had 17 items, and here I see only two. Or am I confusing it with another senate session?

Yes, the senate report with 17 items was the March Senate session reporting and you can find it on this main list message #75262, (7 of April 2763).

But as I did not detail the Items in which the senators voted, Q. Metellus asked me those details. In the report posted on April 7 I just gave the titles of the items not all the details...

Optime vale.

C. Petronius Dexter
Tribunus Plebis Arcoiali scribebat
A. d. XVII Kalendas Iunias P. Memmio K. Fabio II coss.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75852 From: L. Livia Plauta Date: 2010-05-16
Subject: Re: Results of the Senate Meeting of April 2763 auc.
Salve Messallina,
thanks! Sorry for the confusion, but with this big distance between the
sessions and their report one tends to get mixed-up.

Optime vale,
Livia

----- Original Message -----
From: "Maxima Valeria Messallina" <maximavaleriamessallina@...>
To: <Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Sunday, May 16, 2010 10:30 PM
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Results of the Senate Meeting of April 2763 auc.


Salve, Livia

There were 15 items on the agenda of the March Senate Meeting, to which
Dexter was the reporting Tribune. I don't how 15 got changed into 17, but on
this list, I'm not surprised. LOL
Dexter already posted his report of the March session, but Metellus asked
for additional information on certain items on Dexter's report. Dexter will
post that additional information to the CPT list as soon as he can.
I was the reporting Tribune for the April Senate Meeting, which had four
items, but only two had voting. I hope that clears everything up.

Vale bene,

Maxima Valeria Messallina




<<--- On Sun, 5/16/10, L. Livia Plauta <livia.plauta@...> wrote:

Salve Messallina,
thank you for the report, but a few days ago Dexter was complaining that the
last senate session had 17 items, and here I see only two. Or am I confusing
it with another senate session?

Optime vale,
Livia>>




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75853 From: gualterus_graecus Date: 2010-05-16
Subject: Re: "Responsum augurum de tripudio consularis"
Salvete,

Well, it seems this argument isn't going to end easily, so I can't help but step in. First of all, Smith's dictionary is extremely useful for precisely the reason stated here, that it extensively quotes the primary sources extant a century ago. There isn't much Latin literature that we have now that wasn't available a century ago. Where Smith fails is on the archaeological data. So, of course, Smith's dictionary should not be cited as the main secondary source, but many of his discussions are still relevant today. Augury is one of those topics, since Smith collects much of the primary source material available even now.

Secondly, the modern literature largely agrees with Smith on the question of who took the auspices and the role of the augurs (Linderski, "Augural Law" 2190-2215 for the bulk of the relevant discussion; Scheid, _Roman Religion_ 112-119, but, really, Scheid's book is a superficial survey and doesn't compare to Smith's discussion). With very few exceptions (such as rituals at the arx), it was the presiding magistrate who took the auspices. An augur may be present to look for oblative signs and in general check for procedural mistakes, but this was not required. However, it was on these two occasions that an augural declaration would be immediately binding. In our case, Piscinus was not present at the taken auspices so his declaration would not have been considered binding.

What would have happened? The ancient procedure for questions post actionem was for the senate to request an official inquiry by the college of augurs (Linderski 2211-12), which would then be taken as the basis for a senatorial decree. Without that decree augural declarations about vitia would not be binding, but merely "expert opinion". And, from the brief summary of the procedure that Piscinus conveyed, I can't help but completely agree with him: the taken auspices were completely bungled.

Now, insofar as NR law is concerned it seems to put the mos maiorum on its head and vests unprecedented power in our augurs. I'll assume for the time being that Piscinus' reading of the NR law is accurate since I haven't bothered combing through it myself, but in terms of history, the consul was fully in the right to perform the auspices--unfortunately, he didn't have an augur assisting him and messed up.

Valete,

Gualterus

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "marcus.lucretius" <marcus.lucretius@...> wrote:
>
>
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Cato" <catoinnyc@> wrote:
> >
> > Cato Piscino PM Memmio consule Caesari omnibusque in foro SPD
> >
> > Although I understand the logic behind your argument, Piscinus, I must disagree to a great extent, and the scholarship is found in Smith's Dictionary, under "Augur, Augurium":
> >
>
> Agricola Catoni Omnibusque SPD
>
> Smith's is not a reliable source on this topic. Smith's in general is handy for citations into the primary literature, and sometimes is useful on certain topics, especially as it is so accessible. I used it twice recently in the article on divination, once for a nice quote and once for an indirect citation to a very early reference on a point that everyone still agrees on, but the bulk of the article is based on Scheid. I'm now working through some Linderski articles, I'm going to re-read Beard and I'm just finishing Vaahtera. If I had to recommend just one, I'd say look at Scheid. Very readable, affordable and far more up to date than Smith's. The Vaahtera is expensive and most useful to those with good Latin and some Greek, but contains some really interesting discussion.
>
> optime vale, et valete bene
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75854 From: marcus.lucretius Date: 2010-05-16
Subject: Re: "Responsum augurum de tripudio consularis"
--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Cato" <catoinnyc@...> wrote:
>
> Cato Agricolae sal.
>
> Upon what authorities do you base the assertion that Smith's is not reliable on this subject? Does Lindersky - or Scheid - differ in any substantial way(s) on the subject?

Yes.

> If so, in what way(s)?

The answer would be too long, so instead I'll make a remark about some of the ways that this happens.

Texts are reinterpreted when new understandings are proposed, either of difficult readings or of technical vocabulary. Old interpretations are sometimes revised then they are shown to have been built on incorrect assumptions. Texts are also reinterpreted when new paradigms develop in related fields, leading to new perspectives on old material. Sometimes new texts are found, e.g. inscriptions or papyri.

In the case of Smith's, we have to take it on a case by case basis. I would not use it as a final authority for anything connected to the religio, even though there may be useful bits.


optime vale

Agricola


>
> Vale,
>
> Cato
>
>
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "marcus.lucretius" <marcus.lucretius@> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Cato" <catoinnyc@> wrote:
> > >
> > > Cato Piscino PM Memmio consule Caesari omnibusque in foro SPD
> > >
> > > Although I understand the logic behind your argument, Piscinus, I must disagree to a great extent, and the scholarship is found in Smith's Dictionary, under "Augur, Augurium":
> > >
> >
> > Agricola Catoni Omnibusque SPD
> >
> > Smith's is not a reliable source on this topic. Smith's in general is handy for citations into the primary literature, and sometimes is useful on certain topics, especially as it is so accessible. I used it twice recently in the article on divination, once for a nice quote and once for an indirect citation to a very early reference on a point that everyone still agrees on, but the bulk of the article is based on Scheid. I'm now working through some Linderski articles, I'm going to re-read Beard and I'm just finishing Vaahtera. If I had to recommend just one, I'd say look at Scheid. Very readable, affordable and far more up to date than Smith's. The Vaahtera is expensive and most useful to those with good Latin and some Greek, but contains some really interesting discussion.
> >
> > optime vale, et valete bene
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75855 From: C.Maria Caeca Date: 2010-05-16
Subject: new cntact info ...(OT?)
Salvete omnes,

Since I want to make myself available to all my fellow cives, I would like
to tell you that (after much frustration and grief), I have successfully
downloaded and installed Skype. They wouldn't allow me to use my Roman name
as my Skype name (not kind of them!) but you can find me under Shoshana
Hathaway.

Valete quam optime,
C. Maria Caeca
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75856 From: Cato Date: 2010-05-16
Subject: Re: "Responsum augurum de tripudio consularis"
Cato Agricolae sal.

I'm going to re-read the sections in Beard, North & Price and purchase Scheid to read.

But it appears, from Graecus' answer, that neither Lindersky nor Scheid actually disagree with Smith in any substantive way on this subject.

Vale,

Cato



--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "marcus.lucretius" <marcus.lucretius@...> wrote:
>
>
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Cato" <catoinnyc@> wrote:
> >
> > Cato Agricolae sal.
> >
> > Upon what authorities do you base the assertion that Smith's is not reliable on this subject? Does Lindersky - or Scheid - differ in any substantial way(s) on the subject?
>
> Yes.
>
> > If so, in what way(s)?
>
> The answer would be too long, so instead I'll make a remark about some of the ways that this happens.
>
> Texts are reinterpreted when new understandings are proposed, either of difficult readings or of technical vocabulary. Old interpretations are sometimes revised then they are shown to have been built on incorrect assumptions. Texts are also reinterpreted when new paradigms develop in related fields, leading to new perspectives on old material. Sometimes new texts are found, e.g. inscriptions or papyri.
>
> In the case of Smith's, we have to take it on a case by case basis. I would not use it as a final authority for anything connected to the religio, even though there may be useful bits.
>
>
> optime vale
>
> Agricola
>
>
> >
> > Vale,
> >
> > Cato
> >
> >
> >
> > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "marcus.lucretius" <marcus.lucretius@> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Cato" <catoinnyc@> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Cato Piscino PM Memmio consule Caesari omnibusque in foro SPD
> > > >
> > > > Although I understand the logic behind your argument, Piscinus, I must disagree to a great extent, and the scholarship is found in Smith's Dictionary, under "Augur, Augurium":
> > > >
> > >
> > > Agricola Catoni Omnibusque SPD
> > >
> > > Smith's is not a reliable source on this topic. Smith's in general is handy for citations into the primary literature, and sometimes is useful on certain topics, especially as it is so accessible. I used it twice recently in the article on divination, once for a nice quote and once for an indirect citation to a very early reference on a point that everyone still agrees on, but the bulk of the article is based on Scheid. I'm now working through some Linderski articles, I'm going to re-read Beard and I'm just finishing Vaahtera. If I had to recommend just one, I'd say look at Scheid. Very readable, affordable and far more up to date than Smith's. The Vaahtera is expensive and most useful to those with good Latin and some Greek, but contains some really interesting discussion.
> > >
> > > optime vale, et valete bene
> > >
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75857 From: Q. Caecilius Metellus Date: 2010-05-17
Subject: De Responso Auguris de Tripudio Consulare
Q Caecilius Metellus Quiritibus salutem plurimam dicit.

Saluete, Quirites.

In the statements following the responsum issued by M Morauius, he quite
explicitly noted the simple fact that, within Noua Roma, responsa do no
carry the weight of law, but are simply expressions of opinion. With
this I do not disagree: he is exactly correct. Nor do I disagree with
the assessment given of magisterial right of auspices, to the effect
that, at present, magistrates do no carry the ius auspicandi. But
before I state the specifics of where I do disagree, given the history
of this issue and arguments made here and elsewhere, I must make one
thing clear. I am not arguing anything with regard to what was done in
Antiquity, nor whether a vitium was made or did occur. My argument is
based on simply what the law in force within Noua Roma is currently. In
view of the standing legislation, I disagree with the augur M Morauius.

In his responsum, the augur posits that Section VI.B.2 of the lex
constitutiua
(http://www.novaroma.org/nr/Current_constitution_%28Nova_Roma%29#VI._Public_Religious_Institutions)
gives individual augurs authority "over the ars auguria and its
application in Nova Roma", which is not entirely true. In fact, the lex
constitutiua gives the College of Augurs that authority alone, not
individual augurs. He further posits, as Point 4 of his conclusions,
"The Collegium Augurum alone has constitutional authority over the
auspices in regard to how they are to be taken, who shall be authorized
to take auspices, how this authorization is granted if extended from the
constitutional authority of the Collegium Augurum, when auspices may be
taken and when, and every other aspect of the ars auguria and of templa
erected under the authority of augures." This is only true in part.
The lex constitutiua specifies (VI.B.2.a.1., on the powers, honours, and
responsibilities of the College of Augurs): "To research, practice, and
uphold the ars auguria (the art of interpreting divine signs and omens,
solicited or otherwise)". The augur is extending the definition of the
ars auguria beyond what the law says. The law specifically defines the
ars auguria; nowhere in that "constitutional authority" is the College
of Augurs (nor, also, individual augurs) given the authority to
determine "who shall be authorized to take auspices" nor "how this
authorization is granted if extended from the constitutional authority
of the Collegium Augurum". The authority of the College of Augurs is
specifically limited to the art of interpretation of signs: anything
more than that is beyond the scope of the College of Augurs insofar as
the lex constitutiua grants.

The law is, doubtlessly, deficient and circuitous. To our misfortune,
this leaves us to interminably argue points of law. As I said in the
chambers of the College of Pontiffs, so too I shall say here: it will do
us better to fix the legislation in place, than to continue arguing
imperfect laws and their applications. I would add, it would do us
equally well to do the former than to try to extend legislation beyond
the letter; continuing in such extensions could only reasonably lead to
such a point where the extended meanings are so far from the letter as
to be unrecognisable.

May Fortune favour the Romans.

Quintus Caecilius Metellus Postumianus
Pontifex
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75858 From: marcushoratius Date: 2010-05-17
Subject: a. d. XVI Kalendas Iunonias: Triumph of Camillus
M. Moravius Piscinus Horatianus Quiritibus et omnibus salutem plurimam dicit: Curate ut valeatis, et Di vos servent.

Hodie est ante diem XVI Kalendas Iunonias; haec dies comitialis est: Eurinus vel Auster cum pluvia.

AUC 359 /394 BCE: Triumph of Camillus over Veii

"Although the portents had been averted by due expiation and the answers given by the soothsayer and the oracle were matters of common knowledge, and all that man could do had been done by the selection of M. Furius, the greatest of all commanders - notwithstanding all this, when the capture of Veii was announced in Rome, after so many years of undecided warfare and numerous defeats, the rejoicing was as great as if there had been no hope of success. Anticipating the order of the senate, all the temples were filled with Roman mothers offering thanksgivings to the Gods. The senate ordered that the public thanksgivings should be continued for four days, a longer period than for any previous war. The arrival of the Dictator, too, whom all classes poured out to meet, was welcomed by a greater concourse than that of any general before. His triumph went far beyond the usual mode of celebrating the day; himself the most conspicuous object of all, he was drawn into the City by a team of white horses, which men thought unbecoming even for a mortal man, let alone a Roman citizen. They saw with superstitious alarm the Dictator putting himself on a level in his equipage with Jupiter and Sol, and this one circumstance made his triumph more brilliant than popular. After this he signed a contract for building the temple of Queen Juno on the Aventine and dedicated one to Matuta the Mother. After having thus discharged his duties to gods and men he resigned his Dictatorship. Subsequently a difficulty arose about the offering to Apollo. Camillus stated that he had vowed a tenth of the spoils to the deity, and the college of pontiffs decided that the people must fulfil their religious obligation. But it was not easy to find a way of ordering the people to restore their share of booty so that the due proportion might be set apart for sacred purposes. At length recourse was had to what seemed the smoothest plan, namely, that any one who wished to discharge the obligation for himself and his household should make a valuation of his share and contribute the value of a tenth of it to the public treasury, in order that out of the proceeds a golden crown might be made, worthy of the grandeur of the temple and the august divinity of the god, and such as the honour of the Roman people demanded. This contribution still further estranged the feelings of the plebeians from Camillus." ~ Titus Livius 5.23

We learn from Pliny (33.111) that one of the unusual aspects of the triumph of Camillus was that his face and body was painted red with cinnabar just as the statue of Jupiter Optimus Maximus in the Capitolium wasduring festivals. He says, too, that the cinnabar was really used in the special perfumes that dressed the statue and a triumphant general, lending a reddish tone to the skin, but the purpose was not really to color the person. The practice fell out of use and by the Late Republic only some antiquarians would have known of the practice in earlier times. Pliny said that Verrius listed those writers who had mentioned the Capitoline statue of Jupiter being so painted with perfume and cinnabar in the past, and as an after thought Camillus is named as one so adorned in his triumph. Considering the reaction he received, he may have been the first and the last to ever redden himself for a triumph; Caesar did not.


Ritual correctness

"Now it would seem that Numa, who in other respects also was a very wise director of sacred rites, had very properly sought to secure the people's reverent attention by means of the following ordinance. When, namely, magistrates or priests perform any religious function, a herald goes before, crying with a loud voice, "Hoc age." The meaning of this cry is, Mind this! and it warns the people to give heed to the sacred rites, and suffer no task or demand of business to intervene, implying that men perform most of their duties under some sort of compulsion and by constraint. And it is customary for the Romans to renew sacrifices and processions and spectacles, not only for such a reason as the above, but also for trivial reasons. For instance, if one of the horses drawing the sacred chariots called tesnae gives out; or again, if the charioteer takes hold of the reins with his left hand, they decree that the procession be renewed. And in later ages, a single sacrifice has been performed thirty times, because again and again some failure or offence was thought to occur. Such is the reverent care of the Romans in religious matters." ~ Plutarch, Life of Coriolanus 25.2-3

"We see too, how that our supreme magistrates use certain formulæ for their prayers: that not a single word may be omitted or pronounced out of its place, it is the duty of one person to precede the dignitary by reading the formula before him from a written ritual, of another, to keep watch upon every word, and of a third to see that silence is not ominously broken; while a musician, in the meantime, is performing on the flute to prevent any other words being heard. Indeed, there are memorable instances recorded in our Annals, of cases where either the sacrifice has been interrupted, and so blemished, by imprecations, or a mistake has been made in the utterance of the prayer; the result being that the lobe of the liver or the heart has disappeared in a moment, or has been doubled, while the victim stood before the altar." ~ C. Plinius Secundus 28.3 (11)


Bucephalas

"The horse of King Alexander was called Bucephalas because of the shape of his head. Chares wrote that he was bought for thirteen talents and given to King Philip; that amount in Roman money is three hundred and twelve thousand sesterces. It seemed a noteworthy characteristic of this horse that when he was armed and equipped for battle, he would never allow himself to be mounted by any other than the king. It is also related that Alexander in the war against India, mounted upon that horse and doing p385valorous deeds, had driven him, with disregard of his own safety, too far into the enemies' ranks. The horse had suffered deep wounds in his neck and side from the weapons hurled from every hand at Alexander, but though dying and almost exhausted from loss of blood, he yet in swiftest course bore the king from the midst of the foe; but when he had taken him out of range of the weapons, the horse at once fell, and satisfied with having saved his master breathed his last, with indications of relief that were almost human. Then King Alexander, after winning the victory in that war, founded a city in that region and in honour of his horse called it Bucephalon." ~ A. Gellius, Noctes Atticae 5.2


Our thought for today is from Marcus Aurelius, Meditations 12.28:

"To those who ask, `Where have you seen the Gods? What conviction to Their existence leads you to this worship of the Gods?' I reply first that They are in fact visible to our eyes. Secondly, and notwithstanding, that I have not seen my own soul either, and yet I honour it. So it is with the Gods, too: from my every experience of Their power time after time I am certain that They exist, and I revere Them."
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75859 From: marcushoratius Date: 2010-05-17
Subject: Re: "Responsum augurum de tripudio consularis"
Piscinus Catone s. p. d.

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Cato" <catoinnyc@...> wrote:
>
> Cato Piscino PM Memmio consule Caesari omnibusque in foro SPD
>
> Although I understand the logic behind your argument, Piscinus, I must disagree to a great extent,

I am so surprised.

and the scholarship is found in Smith's Dictionary, under "Augur, Augurium":

LOL, Look, Cato, referring to an old handbook does not make you knowledgable on the subjext, and that assumes you could understand what you read. For example, you wrote:

>
> The auspices belonging to the different magistrates were divided into two classes, called auspicia maxima or majora and minora. The former, which belonged originally to the kings, passed over to the consuls on the institution of the republic, and likewise to the extraordinary magistrates, the dictators, interreges, and consular tribunes. When the consuls were deprived in course of time of part of their duties, and separate magistrates were created to discharge them, they naturally received the auspicia majora also; this was the case with the censors and praetors. The quaestors and the curule aediles, on the contrary, had only the auspicia minora, because they received them from the consuls and praetors of the year, and their auspices were derived from the majora of the higher magistrates (Messalla, ap. Gell. XIII.15)."
>


Had you bothered to actually read Gellius, instead of Smith citing Gellius, you would know your information is entirely wrong. Auspicia maxima refers to the auspices underwhich consules and praetores were elected, not what they possessed, while other magistrates were elected under auspicia minora.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75860 From: L. Livia Plauta Date: 2010-05-17
Subject: Re: a. d. XVI Kalendas Iunonias: Triumph of Camillus
Salve Piscine,
again, the weather forecast is precise. Today in Budapest there's a strong
wind (might be Auster) and rain.

Optime vale,
Livia

>Hodie est ante diem XVI Kalendas Iunonias; haec dies comitialis est:
>Eurinus vel Auster >cum pluvia.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75861 From: rory12001 Date: 2010-05-17
Subject: Re: De Responso Auguris de Tripudio Consulare
Maior Quiritibus spd;
I wrote my friend Cordus a long letter about the tiresome passion for pedantic legal-wrangling in Nova Roma.

Cordus replied, that this was the result as from the beginning NR tried to enforce Roman behavior by laws. Rather in the Republic;

"They argued political issues on moral principal and practical expediency"

Now that sounds sensible to me!

If magistrates have no clue how to take auspices, learn or get an augur to do it. This is just common sense for new Romans.

Issues in construing augural law; it's the province of the College of Augurs; to be chosen augur was the apex of Roman life. So I have nothing to say about the matter!
optime vale
Maior


My argument is
> based on simply what the law in force within Noua Roma is currently. In
> view of the standing legislation, I disagree with the augur M Morauius.
>
> In his responsum, the augur posits that Section VI.B.2 of the lex
> constitutiua
> (http://www.novaroma.org/nr/Current_constitution_%28Nova_Roma%29#VI._Public_Religious_Institutions)
> gives individual augurs authority "over the ars auguria and its
> application in Nova Roma", which is not entirely true. In fact, the lex
> constitutiua gives the College of Augurs that authority alone, not
> individual augurs. He further posits, as Point 4 of his conclusions,
> "The Collegium Augurum alone has constitutional authority over the
> auspices in regard to how they are to be taken, who shall be authorized
> to take auspices, how this authorization is granted if extended from the
> constitutional authority of the Collegium Augurum, when auspices may be
> taken and when, and every other aspect of the ars auguria and of templa
> erected under the authority of augures." This is only true in part.
> The lex constitutiua specifies (VI.B.2.a.1., on the powers, honours, and
> responsibilities of the College of Augurs): "To research, practice, and
> uphold the ars auguria (the art of interpreting divine signs and omens,
> solicited or otherwise)". The augur is extending the definition of the
> ars auguria beyond what the law says. The law specifically defines the
> ars auguria; nowhere in that "constitutional authority" is the College
> of Augurs (nor, also, individual augurs) given the authority to
> determine "who shall be authorized to take auspices" nor "how this
> authorization is granted if extended from the constitutional authority
> of the Collegium Augurum". The authority of the College of Augurs is
> specifically limited to the art of interpretation of signs: anything
> more than that is beyond the scope of the College of Augurs insofar as
> the lex constitutiua grants.
>
> The law is, doubtlessly, deficient and circuitous. To our misfortune,
> this leaves us to interminably argue points of law. As I said in the
> chambers of the College of Pontiffs, so too I shall say here: it will do
> us better to fix the legislation in place, than to continue arguing
> imperfect laws and their applications. I would add, it would do us
> equally well to do the former than to try to extend legislation beyond
> the letter; continuing in such extensions could only reasonably lead to
> such a point where the extended meanings are so far from the letter as
> to be unrecognisable.
>
> May Fortune favour the Romans.
>
> Quintus Caecilius Metellus Postumianus
> Pontifex
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75862 From: Cato Date: 2010-05-17
Subject: Re: De Responso Auguris de Tripudio Consulare
Cato Maiori sal.

You wrote:

"If magistrates have no clue how to take auspices ... get an augur to do it. This is just common sense for new Romans."

That sounds all well and good, but in fact it violates ancient religious practice. Magistrates took the auspices and augurs were asked their opinions regarding the omens.

It's this kind of simplification - or sheer ignorance - of the basics that gets us in a great deal of trouble as well.

While the ancients may not have had legal wrangling about these particular topics, the vast amount of law that we have from them shows quite clearly that they were no strangers to arguing over legal minutiae.

Vale,

Cato



--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "rory12001" <rory12001@...> wrote:
>
> Maior Quiritibus spd;
> I wrote my friend Cordus a long letter about the tiresome passion for pedantic legal-wrangling in Nova Roma.
>
> Cordus replied, that this was the result as from the beginning NR tried to enforce Roman behavior by laws. Rather in the Republic;
>
> "They argued political issues on moral principal and practical expediency"
>
> Now that sounds sensible to me!
>
> If magistrates have no clue how to take auspices, learn or get an augur to do it. This is just common sense for new Romans.
>
> Issues in construing augural law; it's the province of the College of Augurs; to be chosen augur was the apex of Roman life. So I have nothing to say about the matter!
> optime vale
> Maior
>
>
> My argument is
> > based on simply what the law in force within Noua Roma is currently. In
> > view of the standing legislation, I disagree with the augur M Morauius.
> >
> > In his responsum, the augur posits that Section VI.B.2 of the lex
> > constitutiua
> > (http://www.novaroma.org/nr/Current_constitution_%28Nova_Roma%29#VI._Public_Religious_Institutions)
> > gives individual augurs authority "over the ars auguria and its
> > application in Nova Roma", which is not entirely true. In fact, the lex
> > constitutiua gives the College of Augurs that authority alone, not
> > individual augurs. He further posits, as Point 4 of his conclusions,
> > "The Collegium Augurum alone has constitutional authority over the
> > auspices in regard to how they are to be taken, who shall be authorized
> > to take auspices, how this authorization is granted if extended from the
> > constitutional authority of the Collegium Augurum, when auspices may be
> > taken and when, and every other aspect of the ars auguria and of templa
> > erected under the authority of augures." This is only true in part.
> > The lex constitutiua specifies (VI.B.2.a.1., on the powers, honours, and
> > responsibilities of the College of Augurs): "To research, practice, and
> > uphold the ars auguria (the art of interpreting divine signs and omens,
> > solicited or otherwise)". The augur is extending the definition of the
> > ars auguria beyond what the law says. The law specifically defines the
> > ars auguria; nowhere in that "constitutional authority" is the College
> > of Augurs (nor, also, individual augurs) given the authority to
> > determine "who shall be authorized to take auspices" nor "how this
> > authorization is granted if extended from the constitutional authority
> > of the Collegium Augurum". The authority of the College of Augurs is
> > specifically limited to the art of interpretation of signs: anything
> > more than that is beyond the scope of the College of Augurs insofar as
> > the lex constitutiua grants.
> >
> > The law is, doubtlessly, deficient and circuitous. To our misfortune,
> > this leaves us to interminably argue points of law. As I said in the
> > chambers of the College of Pontiffs, so too I shall say here: it will do
> > us better to fix the legislation in place, than to continue arguing
> > imperfect laws and their applications. I would add, it would do us
> > equally well to do the former than to try to extend legislation beyond
> > the letter; continuing in such extensions could only reasonably lead to
> > such a point where the extended meanings are so far from the letter as
> > to be unrecognisable.
> >
> > May Fortune favour the Romans.
> >
> > Quintus Caecilius Metellus Postumianus
> > Pontifex
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75863 From: Cato Date: 2010-05-17
Subject: Re: "Responsum augurum de tripudio consularis"
Cato Piscino sal.

Well, as Graecus has shown - and he has significantly more scholarly background than you or I regarding such matters - Smith is entirely adequate on the matter of augury.

It is fundamental errors in our law that allow such perplexing situations to arise; whether or not Cordus - or Maior speaking for Cordus, rather - or anyone else likes the necessity of legislating those things that the ancients may have understood by virtue of their centuries of actually living it, we are bound by that necessity.

Vale,

Cato
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75864 From: gualterus_graecus Date: 2010-05-18
Subject: Re: "Responsum augurum de tripudio consularis"
Salve,

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "marcushoratius" <MHoratius@...> wrote:
>
> Piscinus Catone s. p. d.
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Cato" <catoinnyc@> wrote:
> >
> > Cato Piscino PM Memmio consule Caesari omnibusque in foro SPD

...

>
> Had you bothered to actually read Gellius, instead of Smith citing Gellius, you would know your information is entirely wrong. Auspicia maxima refers to the auspices underwhich consules and praetores were elected, not what they possessed, while other magistrates were elected under auspicia minora.
>

It's both. Messala apud Gellius 13.15.4 discusses both the auspices under which censores, consuls and praetors are elected, as well as the auspices they possess: "Patriciorum auspicia in duas sunt divisa potestates. Maxima sunt consulum, praetorum, censorum... Reliquorum magistratuum minora sunt auspicia." This is clearly born out by his discussion of who can vitiate whose auspices, although, here he is concerned by the rank differences among the censors, consuls and praetors, but if this were not all within the context of who possesses which types of auspices it wouldn't make any sense to bring it up.

-Gualterus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75865 From: C. Curius Saturninus Date: 2010-05-18
Subject: Programmers, web-developers and graphic designers needed for NR web
Salvete omnes,

To rebuild NR web services we need the help of our citizens. We need
professional programmers, web-developers and graphic desginers. The
work in question will consist of a complete re-write of Album Civium
and Cista software. Please read more details below:

Programmers
We need professional programmers with at least 5 years of work
experience in the field of database and web-programming. Complete
fluency in MySQL, PHP and other comparable technology is a basic
requirement. Please send your CV, information about your approximate
hourly fee and some work samples to NR CIO C. Curius Saturninus
(c.curius at academiathules.org). He is also available to give more
information should you have any questions.

Web-developers
We need professional web-developers with at least 5 years of work
experience in the field of database and web-programming. Complete
fluency in MySQL, PHP and other comparable technology is a basic
requirement. Please send your CV, information about your approximate
hourly fee and some work samples to NR CIO C. Curius Saturninus
(c.curius at academiathules.org). He is also available to give more
information should you have any questions.

Graphic designers
We need professional graphic designers with at least 5 years of work
experience in the field of graphic design for web. Suitable education,
good references and portfolio are basic requirements. The work will
consist of complete re-design of NR corporate identity with website
graphics. Please send your CV, information about your approximate
hourly fee and some work samples to NR CIO C. Curius Saturninus
(c.curius at academiathules.org). He is also available to give more
information should you have any questions.

Valete

C. Curius Saturninus
(Mikko Sillanpää)

Rector Academia Thules ad Studia Romana Antiqua et Nova
Senator - Legatus Pro Praetore Provinciae Thules

e-mail: c.curius@...
www.academiathules.org
thule.novaroma.org



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75866 From: marcushoratius Date: 2010-05-18
Subject: a/ d. XV Kalendas Iunonias: Death of Brutus
M. Moravius Piscinus Horatianus Quiritibus et omnibus salutem plurimam dicit: Deus salvere vos iubet

Hodie est ante diem XV Kalendas Iunonias; haec dies comitialis est: Sol in Geminis, Eurinus vel Auster cum pluvia.

AUC 244 / 509 BCE: Death of Brutus

"So two armies from these cities followed Tarquin to recover his crown and chastise the Romans. When they had entered the Roman territory the consuls advanced against them; Valerius with the infantry in phalanx formation, Brutus reconnoitring in advance with the cavalry. Similarly the enemy's cavalry was in front of his main body, Arruns Tarquin, the king's son, in command; the king himself followed with the legionaries. Whilst still at a distance Arruns distinguished the consul by his escort of lictors; as they drew nearer he clearly recognised Brutus by his features, and in a transport of rage exclaimed, "That is the man who drove us from our country; see him proudly advancing, adorned with our insignia! Ye gods, avengers of kings, aid me!" With these words, he dug spurs into his horse and rode straight at the consul. Brutus saw that he was making for him. It was a point of honour in those days for the leaders to engage in single combat, so he eagerly accepted the challenge, and they charged with such fury, neither of them thinking of protecting himself, if only he could wound his foe, that each drove his spear at the same moment through the other's shield, and they fell dying from their horses, with the spears sticking in them. The rest of the cavalry at once engaged, and not long after the infantry came up. The battle raged with varying fortune, the two armies being fairly matched; the right wing of each was victorious, the left defeated. The Veientes, accustomed to defeat at the hands of the Romans, were scattered in flight, but the Tarquinians, a new foe, not only held their ground, but forced the Romans to give way.

"After the battle had gone in this way, so great a panic seized Tarquin and the Etruscans that the two armies of Veii and Tarquinii, on the approach of night, despairing of success, left the field and departed for their homes. The story of the battle was enriched by marvels. In the silence of the next night a great voice is said to have come from the forest of Arsia, believed to be the voice of Silvanus, which spoke thus: "The fallen of the Tusci are one more than those of their foe; the Roman is conqueror." At all events the Romans left the field as victors; the Etruscans regarded themselves as vanquished, for when daylight appeared not a single enemy was in sight. P. Valerius, the consul, collected the spoils and returned in triumph to Rome. He celebrated his colleague's obsequies with all the pomp possible in those days, but far greater honour was done to the dead by the universal mourning, which was rendered specially noteworthy by the fact that the matrons were a whole year in mourning for him, because he had been such a determined avenger of violated chastity." ~ Titus Livius 2.6-7


AUC 413 / 340 BCE: T. Manlius Imperiosus Torquatus, consul, held his triumph over the Latins, Campanians, Sidicini and Aurunci, a. d. 15 k.Jun. ~ Fasi Triumphales

The reference here is to the Battle of Trifanum following the incident where Manlius had executed his own son for boldly leading the cavalry and after Decius Mus had devoted himself to save his army. Both sides were severely battered in the fight. The Samnites next came up in support of the Romans, while the other side had been reinforced as well from Latin cities, the Volsci, and Campania.

"This army was met by the consul at Trifanum, a place between Sinuessa and Menturnae. Without waiting even to choose the sites for their camps, the two armies piled their baggage, fought and finished the war, for the Latins were so utterly worsted that when the consul with his victorious army was preparing to ravage their territory, they made a complete surrender and the Campanians followed their example." ~ T. Livius 8.11


White Garments Worn in Mourning

"Why do women, when in mourning, dress in white robes and in white headdresses? Do they do this, as men say of the Magi, arraying themselves against Hades and the powers of darkness, and making themselves like unto Light and Brightness? Or is it that, just as they clothe the body of the dead in white, they think it proper that the relatives should also wear this color? They adorn the body thus since they cannot so adorn the soul; and they wish to send forth the soul bright and pure, since it is now set free after having fought the good fight in all its manifold forms. Or are plainness and simplicity most becoming on these occasions? Or the dyed garments, some reflect expense, other over elaboration; for we may say no less with reference to black than to purple: `These be cheating garments, these be cheating colors.' That which is naturally black is dyed not through art, but by Nature; and when it iscombined with a dark color, it is overpowered. Only white, therefore, is pure, unmixed, and uncontaminated by dye, nor can it be imitated; wherefore it is most appropriate for the dead at burial. For he who is dead has become something simple, unmixed, and pure, once he has been released from the body, which is indeed to be compared with a stain made by dying. In Argos, as Socrates says, persons in mourning wear white garments washed in water." ~ Plutarch, Roman Questions 26


For today our thought comes from M. Tullius Cicero, Pro Sestia 68.143:

"Let us hope for what we want, but let us endure whatever comes our way."
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75867 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2010-05-19
Subject: Latin classes--again
A. Tullia Scholastica quiritibus, sociis, peregrinisque bonae voluntatis
S.P.D.

Now that I have (just barely) finished correcting the last homework
assignment of this academic year, it is time to remind everyone that we
teach beginning and intermediate Latin via two different methods. Those who
prefer the traditional, grammar-oriented approach may find the Wheelock
textbook and method we use to their liking, and those who do better with a
more natural approach may profit from the Assimil one we use in the other
classes. Both will teach the survivors Latin, and one will teach the
students to speak it, at least at an intermediate level. Both will also
teach at least some composition skills, so that graduates should be able to
write in Latin.

Although both texts we use are oriented toward independent learning,
there is no substitute for having a structured course to facilitate matters.
Very few can learn on their own. Moreover, we go well beyond the text in
both the Grammatica Latina (Wheelock) and Sermo Latinus (Assimil) courses,
supplementing the work contained therein. Yes, these courses are no
pushovers; our courses are rigorous, and will demand time and effort from
the students. Not all survive, but those who do find that they can read,
perhaps write or even speak Latin without recourse to reference works. For
those involved in a Roman-oriented organization such as Nova Roma,
especially for those who practice the Religio, a knowledge of Latin is
highly desirable at the very least.

Those wishing to register for any of our courses (Grammatica Latina I,
Grammatica Latina II, Sermo Latinus I, Sermo Latinus II, and combined Sermo
Latinus I & II) should contact me. All prospective students should have the
textbook in hand before they can be registered, and must also await the
completion of the courses now in progress. The instructional phase is now
over in all courses, but Combined Sermo is working on its final examination
and Grammatica II will soon face theirs. Sermo II and Grammatica I have
completed the final, which I must correct, and it seems all anticipated
students in Sermo I have submitted their examination papers. My next order
of red ink should arrive in time for me to correct the Grammatica I and
Sermo I papers shortly so that we can open those courses to new registrants.

Once again, the textbook for the Grammatica courses is Wheelocks Latin,
by Frederic Wheelock, sixth edition revised by Richard LaFleur, and the text
for the Assimil courses is Le Latin Sans Peine by Clement Desessard. The
Assimil text is also available in an Italian version, whose title is
something like Latina senza sforzo. The Assimil texts have been translated
into English and Spanish for the use of our students; the translations are
available only on the course sites, and are presented one lesson at a time.
The Wheelock text is commonly available in college bookstores in
English-speaking countries, and may be ordered elsewhere; the Assimil text
is available online, or possibly through various online booksellers. The
French version is out of print; it has been replaced by a vastly inferior
text which the publisher would be delighted to foist off on any unsuspecting
purchaser, but those of discernment will note that the author of the newer
text cannot handle Latin grammar and should never have been allowed to write
a text on the subject. Caveat emptor!

There is a chance that we shall be able to offer the Rudimenta Latina
course again this coming year, for we anticipate the addition of a
highly-qualified teacher who may be able to take this on, but at this
writing, we cannot guarantee that we can offer this short preliminary,
non-language course.

Valete.


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75868 From: marcushoratius Date: 2010-05-19
Subject: a. d. XIV Kalendas Iunonias: Valerius Poplicola; Sabine Wars
M. Moravius Piscinus Horatianus Quiritibus et omnibus salutem plurimam dicit: Ego vos iubeo bono animo esse.

Hodie est ante diem XIV Kalendas Iunonias; haec dies comitialis est: Sol in Geminos introitum facit.

AUC 244 / 509 BCE: P. Valerius Poplicola: Beginning of the Res Publica

"After this the surviving consul, who had been in such favour with the multitude, found himself-such is its fickleness-not only unpopular but an object of suspicion, and that of a very grave character. It was rumoured that he was aiming at monarchy, for he had held no election to fill Brutus' place, and he was building a house on the top of the Velia, an impregnable fortress was being constructed on that high and strong position. The consul felt hurt at finding these rumours so widely believed, and summoned the people to an assembly. As he entered the 'fasces' were lowered, to the great delight of the multitude, who understood that it was to them that they were lowered as an open avowal that the dignity and might of the people were greater than those of the consul. Then, after securing silence, he began to eulogise the good fortune of his colleague who had met his death, as a liberator of his country, possessing the highest honour it could bestow, fighting for the commonwealth, whilst his glory was as yet undimmed by jealousy and distrust. Whereas he himself had outlived his glory and fallen on days of suspicion and opprobrium; from being a liberator of his country he had sunk to the level of the Aquilii and Vitellii. 'Will you,' he cried, 'never deem any man's merit so assured that it cannot be tainted by suspicion? Am I, the most determined foe to kings to dread the suspicion of desiring to be one myself? Even if I were dwelling in the Citadel on the Capitol, am I to believe it possible that I should be feared by my fellow-citizens? Does my reputation amongst you hang on so slight a thread? Does your confidence rest upon such a weak foundation that it is of greater moment where I am than who I am? The house of Publius Valerius shall be no check upon your freedom, your Velia shall be safe. I will not only move my house to level ground, but I will move it to the bottom of the hill that you may dwell above the citizen whom you suspect. Let those dwell on the Velia who are regarded as truer friends of liberty than Publius Valerius.' All the materials were forthwith carried below the Velia and his house was built at the very bottom of the hill where now stands the temple of Vica Pota.

"Laws were passed which not only cleared the consul from suspicion but produced such a reaction that he won the people's affections, hence his soubriquet of Publicola. The most popular of these laws were those which granted a right of appeal from the magistrate to the people and devoted to the gods the person and property of any one who entertained projects of becoming king. Valerius secured the passing of these laws while still sole consul, that the people might feel grateful solely to him; afterwards he held the elections for the appointment of a colleague. The consul elected was Sp. Lucretius. But he had not, owing to his great age, strength enough to discharge the duties of his office, and within a few days he died." ~ Titus Livius 2.7-8


P. Valerius Poplicola as a Model of Moderation

"I shall pass to the most salutary part of the soul, moderation, which does not let our minds be carried away by a rush of uncontrolled passion. So comes it that this quality is always exempt from bite of censure and rich in earning of praise. Therefore let it recognize its effects in famous men.

"To begin from the cradle of the highest office, P. Valerius won the name Poplicola by reverencing the majesty of the People. After the expulsion of the kings, he saw the entirety of their power and all its emblems transferred to himself under the title of Consul. He reduced the invidious eminence of the magistracy to a tolerable level by moderation, withdrawing axes from the fasces and lowering the latter in the assemblies of the People. He also halved their number and of his own accord took Sp. Lucretius as his colleague, to whom he had the fasces transferred, giving him priority because he was older. He further carried a law in the Comitia Centuriata forbidding magistrates to flog or put to death a Roman Citizen against appeal. Thus to give more freedom to the community he whittled down his own power bit by bit. Add that he demolished his house because it stood on high ground giving the appearance of a citadel. Can we not say that the lower his house, the more lofty became his glory?" ~ Valerius Maximus 4.1. praef and 4.1.1


AUC 249 / 504 BCE: P. Valerius Poplicola and the Sabine War

"The new consuls were M. Valerius and P. Postumius. This year a successful action was fought with the Sabines; the consuls celebrated a triumph. Then the Sabines made preparations for war on a larger scale. To oppose them and also at the same time to guard against danger in the direction of Tusculum, from which place war, though not openly declared, was still apprehended, the consuls elected were P. Valerius for the fourth time and T. Lucretius for the second. A conflict which broke out amongst the Sabines between the peace party and the war party brought an accession of strength to the Romans. Attius Clausus, who was afterwards known in Rome as Appius Claudius, was an advocate for peace, but, unable to maintain his ground against the opposing faction, who were stirring up war, he fled to Rome with a large body of clients. They were admitted to the citizenship and received a grant of land lying beyond the Anio. They were called the Old Claudian tribe, and their numbers were added to by fresh tribesmen from that district. After his election into the senate it was not long before Appius gained a prominent position in that body. The consuls marched into the Sabine territory, and by their devastation of the country and the defeats which they inflicted so weakened the enemy that no renewal of the war was to be feared for a long time. The Romans returned home in triumph." ~ Titus Livius 2.16.1-7

AUC 250 / 503 BCE: Death of P. Valerius Poplicola, Sabine War continues

"The following year, in the consulship of Agrippa Menenius and P. Postumius, P. Valerius died. He was universally admitted to be first in the conduct of war and the arts of peace, but though he enjoyed such an immense reputation, his private fortune was so scanty that it could not defray the expenses of his funeral. They were met by the State. The matrons mourned for him as a second Brutus. In the same year two Latin colonies, Pometia and Cora, revolted to the Auruncans. War commenced, and after the defeat of an immense army which had sought to oppose the advance of the consuls into their territory, the whole war was centered round Pometia. There was no respite from bloodshed after the battle any more than during the fighting, many more were killed than were taken prisoners; the prisoners were everywhere butchered; even the hostages, three hundred of whom they had in their hands, fell a victim to the enemy's bloodthirsty rage. This year also there was a triumph in Rome." ~ Titus Livius 2.16.8 ff

Dionysius of Halicarnassis portrays the war with the Sabines somewhat differently. The Fasti Triumphales has M. Valerius receiving a triumph for his defeat of the Sabines in 505/4 BCE and P. Valerius a triumph in the following year over the Sabines as well, just as Livy states. But then the Fasti Triumphales also records an ovation for P. Postumius Tubertus (3 April) and a triumph for his colleague Agrippa Menenius Lanatus (4 April) for their defeat of the Sabines in 503/2. Auruncans are not mentioned by Dionysius or in the Fasti Triumphales for these years. Dionysius' account has Postumius first losing to the Sabines before the Gods intervene to make Menenius victor on another day.

"When Publius Postumius, who was called Tubertus, had been chosen consul for the second time, and with him Agrippa Menenius, called Lanatus, the Sabines made a third incursion into the Roman territory with a larger army, before the Romans were aware of their setting out, and advanced up to the walls of Rome. In this incursion there was great loss of life on the side of the Romans, not only among the husbandmen, on whom the calamity fell suddenly and unexpectedly, before they could take refuge in the nearest fortresses, but also among those who were living in the city at the time. For Postumius, one of the consuls, looking upon this insolence of the enemy as intolerable, hastily took the first men he came upon and marched out to the rescue with greater eagerness than prudence. The Sabines, seeing the Romans advance against them very contemptuously, without order and separated from one another, and wishing to increase their contempt, fell back at a fast walk, as if fleeing, till they came into thick woods where the rest of their army lay in wait. Then, facing about, they engaged with their pursuers, and at the same time the others came out of the wood with a great shout and fell upon them. The Sabines, who were very numerous and were advancing in good order against men who were not keeping their ranks but were disordered and out of breath with running, killed such of them as came to close quarters, and when the rest turned to flight, they barred the roads leading to the city and hemmed them in on the unfortified ridge of a hill. Then, encamping near them (for night was now coming on), they kept guard throughout the whole night to prevent them from stealing away undiscovered. When the news of this misfortune was brought to Rome, there was a great tumult and a rush to the walls, and fear on the part of all lest the enemy, elated by their success, should enter the city in the night. There were lamentations for the slain and compassion for the survivors, who, it was believed, would be promptly captured for want of provisions unless some assistance should reach them quickly. That night, accordingly, they passed in a sorry state of mind and without sleep; but the next day the other consul, Menenius, having armed all the men of military age, marched out with them in good order and discipline to the assistance of those upon the hill. When the Sabines saw them approaching, they remained no longer, but roused up their army and withdrew from the hill, feeling that their present good fortune was enough; and without tarrying much longer, they returned home in great elation, taking with them a rich booty in cattle, slaves, and money.

"The Romans, resenting this defeat, for which they blamed Postumius, one of the consuls, resolved to make an expedition against the territory of the Sabines speedily with all their forces; they were not only eager to retrieve the shameful and unexpected defeat they had received, but were also angered at the very insolent and haughty embassy that had recently come to them from the enemy. For, as if already victorious and having it in their power to take Rome without any trouble if the Romans refused to do as they commanded, they had ordered them to grant a return to the Tarquinii, to yield the leadership to the Sabines, and to establish such a form of government and such laws as the conquerors should prescribe. Replying to the ambassadors, they bade them report to their general council that the Romans commanded the Sabines to lay down their arms, to deliver up their cities to them, and to be subject to them once more as they had been before, and after they had complied with these demands, then to come and stand trial for the injuries and damage they had done them in their former incursions, if they desired to obtain peace and friendship: and in case they refused to carry out these orders, they might expect to see the war soon brought home to their cities. Such demands having been given and received, both sides equipped themselves with everything necessary for the war and led out their forces. The Sabines brought the flower of their youth out of every city armed with splendid weapons; and the Romans drew out all their forces not only from the city but also from the fortresses, looking upon those above the military age and the multitude of domestic servants as a sufficient guard for both the city and the fortresses in the country. And the two armies, approaching each other, pitched their camps a little distance apart near the city of eretum, which belongs to the Sabine nation.

"When each side observed the enemy's condition, of which they judged by the size of the camps and the information given by prisoners, the Sabines were inspired with confidence and felt contempt for the small numbers of the enemy, while the Romans were seized with fear by reason of the multitude of their opponents. But they took courage and entertained no small hopes of victory because of various omens sent to them by the gods, and particularly from a final portent which they saw when they were about to array themselves for battle. It was as follows: From the javelins that were fixed in the ground beside their tents (these javelins are Roman weapons which they hurl and having pointed iron heads, not less than three feet in length, projecting straight forward from one end, and with the iron they are as long as spears of moderate length) — from these javelins flames issued forth round the tips of the heads and the glare extended through the whole camp like that of torches and lasted a great part of the night. From this portent they concluded, as the interpreters of prodigies informed them and as was not difficult for anyone to conjecture, that Heaven was portending to them a speedy and brilliant victory, because, as we know, everything yields to fire and there is nothing that is not consumed by it. And inasmuch as this fire issued from defensive weapons, they came out with great boldness from their camp, and engaging the Sabines, fought, few in number, with enemies many times superior, placing their reliance in their own good courage. Besides, their long experience joined to their willingness to undergo toil encouraged them to despise every danger. First, then, Postumius, who commanded the left wing, desiring to repair his former defeat, forced back the enemy's right, taking no thought for his own life in comparison with gaining the victory, but, like those who are mad and court death, hurling himself into the midst of his enemies. Then those also with Menenius on the other wing, though they were already in distress and being forced to give ground, when they found that the forces under Postumius were victorious over those who confronted them, took courage and advanced against the enemy. And now, as both their wings gave way, the Sabines were utterly routed. For not even those who were posted in the centre of the line, when once their flanks were left bare, stood their ground any longer, but being hard pressed by the Roman horse that charged them in separate troops, they were driven back. And when they all fled toward their entrenchments, the Romans pursued them, and entering with them, captured both camps. All that saved the army of the enemy from being totally destroyed was that night came on and their defeat happened in their own land. For those who fled got safely home more easily because of their familiarity with the country.

"The next day the consuls, after burning their own dead, gathered up the spoils (there were even found some arms belonging to the living, which they had thrown away in their flight) and carried off the captives, whom they had taken in considerable numbers, and the booty, in addition to the plunder taken by the soldiers. This booty having been sold at public auction, all the citizens received back the amount of the contributions which they had severally paid for the equipment of the expedition. Thus the consuls, having gained a most glorious victory, returned home." ~ Dionysius of Halicarnassus 5.44.1-47.1

The victory of Menenius in 503, or 502, did not end the war. Both the Fasti Triumphales and Livy recorded M' Valerius Maximus, dictator, triumphing over the Sabines in 494/3. They are last mentioned nearly fifty years later, in 449 BCE.


AUC 928 / 175 CE: Commodus departed for Germania


Today's though is from the Golden Sayings of Pythagoras 48:

"Never begin to set thy hand to any work, till thou hast first prayed the gods to accomplish what thou art going to begin."
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75869 From: Maxima Valeria Messallina Date: 2010-05-19
Subject: Re: new cntact info ...(OT?)
I think you can add that kind of info onto your Album Civivm page, but I have never been able to do it. Maybe when the IT system gets fixed. Then you can put it on there.
 
Vale bene,
Maxima Valeria Messallina
 
 


--- On Sun, 5/16/10, C.Maria Caeca <c.mariacaeca@...> wrote:


From: C.Maria Caeca <c.mariacaeca@...>
Subject: [Nova-Roma] new cntact info ...(OT?)
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Date: Sunday, May 16, 2010, 5:33 PM


Salvete omnes,

Since I want to make myself available to all my fellow cives, I would like
to tell you that (after much frustration and grief), I have successfully
downloaded and installed Skype.  They wouldn't allow me to use my Roman name
as my Skype name (not kind of them!) but you can find me under Shoshana
Hathaway.

Valete quam optime,
C. Maria Caeca



------------------------------------

Yahoo! Groups Links








[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75870 From: marcushoratius Date: 2010-05-20
Subject: a. d. XIII Kalendas Iunonias: Naevius Attius
M. Moravius Piscinus Horatianus Quiritibus et omnibus salutem plurimam dicit: Invenietis omnia prospera evenisse sequentibus Deos.

Hodie est ante diem XIII Kalendas Iunonias; haec dies comitialis est

Naevius Attius

"The most celebrated of the augurs, the one who changed the position of the altars and marked out the area for the Temple of Jupiter and in other things foretold the will of the Gods to the people by his prophetic art, had as his common or first name Nevius, and for his family name Attius; and he is conceded to have been the most favoured by the Gods of all the experts in his profession and to have gained the greatest reputation by it, having displayed some extraordinary and incredible instances of his augural skill. Of these I shall give one, which I have selected because it has seemed the most wonderful to me; but first I shall relate from what chance he got his start and by what opportunities vouchsafed to him by the Gods he attained to such distinction as to make all the other augurs of his day appear negligible in comparison. His father was a poor man who cultivated a cheap plot of ground, and Nevius, as a boy, assisted him in such tasks as his years could bear; among his other employments he used to drive the swine out to pasture and tend them. One day he fell asleep, and upon waking missed some of the swine. At first he wept, dreading the blows his father would give him; then, going to the chapel of some heroes that had been built on the farm, he besought them to assist him in finding his swine, promising that if they did so he would offer up to them the largest cluster of grapes on the farm. And having found the swine shortly afterwards, he wished to perform his vow to the heroes, but found himself in great perplexity, being unable to discover the largest cluster of grapes. In his anxiety over the matter he prayed to the gods to reveal to him by omens what he sought. Then by a divine inspiration he divided the vineyard into two parts, taking one on his right hand and the other on his left, after which he observed the omens that showed over each; and when there appeared in one of them such birds as he desired, he again divided that into two parts and distinguished in the same manner the birds that came to it. Having continued this method of dividing the places and coming up to the last vine that was pointed out by the birds, he found an incredibly huge cluster. As he was carrying it to the chapel of the heroes he was observed by his father; and when the latter marvelled at the size of the cluster and inquired where he had got it, the boy informed him of the whole matter from the beginning. His father concluded, as was indeed the case, that there were some innate rudiments of the art of divination in the boy, and taking him to the City, he put him in the hands of elementary teachers; then, after he had acquired sufficient general learning, he placed him under the most celebrated master among the Tyrrhenians to learn the augural art. Thus Nevius, who possessed an innate skill of divination and had now added to it the knowledge acquired from the Tyrrhenians, naturally far surpassed, as I said, all the other augurs. And the augurs in the City, even though he was not of their college, used to invite him to their public consultations because of the success of his predictions, and they foretold nothing without his approval.

"This Nevius, when Tarquinius once desired to create three new tribes out of the knights he had previously enrolled, and to give his own name and the names of his personal friends to these additional tribes, alone violently opposed it and would not allow any of the institutions of Romulus to be altered. The king, resenting this opposition and being angry with Nevius, endeavoured to bring his science to nought and show him up as a charlatan who did not speak a word of truth. With this purpose in indicate he summoned Nevius before the tribunal when a large crowd was present in the Forum; and having first informed those about him in what manner he expected to show the augur to be a false prophet, he received Nevius upon his arrival with friendly greetings and said: "Now is the time, Nevius, for you to display the accuracy of your prophetic science. For I have in mind to undertake a great project, and I wish to know whether it is possible. Go, therefore, take the auspices and return speedily. I will sit here and wait for you." The augur did as he was ordered, and returning soon after, said he had obtained favourable omens and declared the undertaking to be possible. But Tarquinius laughed at his words, and taking out a razor and a whetstone from his bosom, said to him: "Now you are convicted, Nevius, of imposing on us and openly lying about the will of the Gods, since you have dared to affirm that even impossible things are possible. I wanted to know from the auspices whether if I strike the whetstone with this razor I shall be able to cut it in halves." At this, laughter arose from all who stood round the tribunal; but Nevius, not daunted by their raillery and clamour, said: "Strike the whetstone confidently, as you propose, Tarquinius. For it will be cut asunder, or I am ready to submit to any punishment." The king, surprised at the confidence of the augur, struck the razor against the whetstone, and the edge of the steel, making its way quite through the stone, not only cut the whetstone asunder but also cut off a part of the hand that held it. All the others who beheld this wonderful and incredible feat cried out in their astonishment; and Tarquinius, ashamed of having made this trial of the man's skill and desiring to atone for his unseemly reproaches, resolved to win back the goodwill of Nevius himself, seeing in him one favoured above all men by the Gods. Among many other instances of kindness by which he won him over, he caused a bronze statue of him to be made and set up in the Forum to perpetuate his memory with posterity. This statue still remained down to my time, standing in front of the senate-house near the sacred fig-tree; it was shorter than a man of average stature and the head was covered with the mantle. At a small distance from the statue both the whetstone and the razor are said to be buried in the earth under a certain altar. The place is called a well by the Romans. Such then, is the account given of this augur.

"Nevius, that skilful augur who, as I said, once opposed the king when he wished to increase the number of the tribes, had, at the very time when he was enjoying the greatest repute for his art and exceeded all the Romans in power, suddenly disappeared, either through the envy of some rival in his own profession or through the plotting of enemies or some other mischance, and none of his relations could either guess his fate or find his body." ~ Dionysius of Halicarnassis 3.70-72.3


Vetruvius on the Placement of Temples

"The lanes and streets of the city being set out, the choice of sites for the convenience and use of the state remains to be decided on; for sacred edifices, for the forum, and for other public buildings. If the place adjoin the sea, the forum should be placed close to the harbour: if inland, it should be in the centre of the town. The temples of the gods, protectors of the city, also those of Jupiter, Juno, and Minerva, should be on some eminence which commands a view of the greater part of the city. The temple of Mercury should be either in the forum, or, as also the temple of Isis and Serapis, in the great public square. Those of Apollo and Father Bacchus near the theatre. If there be neither amphitheatre nor gymnasium, the temple of Hercules should be near the circus. The temple of Mars should be out of the city, in the neighboring country. That of Venus near to the gate. According to the regulations of the Hetrurian Haruspices, the temples of Venus, Vulcan, and Mars should be so placed that those of the first not be in the way of contaminating the matrons and youth with the influence of lust; that those of Vulcan be away from the city, which would consequently be freed from the danger of fire; the divinity presiding over that element being drawn away by the rites and sacrifices performing in his temple. The temple of Mars should be also out of the city, that no armed frays may disturb the peace of the citizens, and that this divinity may, moreover, be ready to preserve them from their enemies and the perils of war.

"The temple of Ceres should be in a solitary spot out of the city, to which the public are not necessarily led but for the purpose of sacrificing to her. This spot is to be reverenced with religious awe and solemnity of demeanor, by those whose affairs lead them to visit it. Appropriate situations must also be chosen for the temples and places of sacrifice to the other divinities. For the construction and proportions of the edifices themselves, I shall give rules in the third and fourth books; because it appears to me, that in the second book I ought to explain the nature of the different materials employed in building, their qualities and use; and then, in the other books, to give rules for the dimensions of buildings, the orders, and their proportions." ~ M. Vitruvius Pollio, De Architectura 1.7


AUC 567 / 186 BCE: Perfume arrives at Rome

"Touching on the invention of ointments, it is not well known who was the first to devise them. Certain it is, that during the reign of the Trojans, and while Ilium stood, perfumes did not yet exist: nor was incense used in sacrifice and divine service. The fume and smoke of the cedar and the citron trees only, the old Trojans were acquainted with when they offered sacrifice: their fuming and wafting fume (more truly I may term it, than any odoriferous perfume) they used: which they might easily come by, since they were plants growing among them, and thus familiar; notwithstanding they had found out the juice of roses, wherewith yet they would not correct the foresaid strong fumes in those days; for that also was known to be a commendable quality of Oile Rosate.

"To say for certain and precisely, when this enormity entered first into Rome and began there to reign, I am not able to say. Sure it is, as appears upon record, that after the subduing of King Antiochus and the conquest of Asia, which was about the 565 year from the foundation of Rome, P. Licinius Crassus, and L. Iulius Cæsar the Censors, published an edict, prohibiting and forbidding to sell any foreign or strange ointments within Rome: for so they termed these sweet mixtures and compositions. But (believe me) nowadays, some there be so wanton and delicate, that there is no wine or other drink good with them, nor will go down their throat, unless it be spiced and aromatized with these balms: and so little pass they for the bitterness of these odours and smells, that they are well content to waste and spend a deal thereof, without and within, behind and before, above and beneath, to enjoy the perfume thereof in all parts of the body where so ever. Well known it is, that L. Plotius, brother to L. Plancus, a man of great credit and authority, as having been twice Consul, and Censor besides, being outlawed and proclaimed a banished person by the decree of the Triumvirs, was discovered within a certain cave at Salernum, where he lay close hidden and sure enough otherwise, by the very smell only of a precious ointment that he had about him: and so by that means (besides the shame and disgrace that he received, thus to detect himself and be found of his enemies) the rigor of the act and arrest that passed against him, was executed and performed upon his body. And who would ever pity such persons, & not judge them worthy to come to so bad an end? But to conclude all this discourse, There is not a country in the world that yields such plenty and variety of drugs fit for these compositions, as Ægypt: and next to it, Campania in Italy may carry the name, for the store of roses there growing." ~ C. Plinius Secundus, Historia Naturalis 13.2, 23-24


Today's thought is from Epicurus, Vatican Sayings 59:

"What cannot be satisfied is not a man's stomach, as most men think, but rather the false opinion that the stomach requires unlimited filling."
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75871 From: tibrvtvs Date: 2010-05-20
Subject: REAL NOVA ROMAN VILLAGE
Salvete Omnes!
 
I am the Procurator of Sarmatia prov. Titus Iunius Brutus. I was very interested with discussion about establishment of a Nova Roman village like http://vikingvisits.co.uk/ in one of abandoned villages of the Mediterranean countries. As I know, there are a lot of abandoned settlements close to tourist sites. We can use one of such villages as a base for true Roman Settlement. We can organize tours to this Settlement and earn some money for development.
No doubt, we can't find a lot of people which can live in Roman Settlement continuously. But Nova Romans can live there by turns, over a period of few weeks. Reconstructors from the entire world will have opportunity to become a true Roman for a while.
THE KEY QUESTION AT THE MOMENT IS - DOES ANY KIND OF GOVERNMENT PROGRAMS OF RESTORING OF ABANDONED VILLAGES EXIST IN MEDITERRANEAN. FOR THE BEGINNING, WE NEED APPROVAL TO SETTLE SUCH A VILLAGE AND SOME KIND OF REGISTATION AS A TOURIST SPOT.
I adress this message to everybody who can help. Thank you.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75872 From: lucius_aelius_paetus Date: 2010-05-20
Subject: Re: REAL NOVA ROMAN VILLAGE
Salve, I think your idea sounds very interesting. I know that Spain
has numerous abandoned villages and a quick google search found an
article indicating that there maybe some governmental grant money
available for those who wish to buy and restore them. Take a look at
this
<http://www.costaeye.com/article/abandoned-villages-of-aragon/#/images/s\
ized/images/articles/DSCF4445-573x354.JPG> , as an example. A few years
ago I stayed at an restored village in Soria which had been converted to
a rural hotel (each guest got a restored cottage). It was quite nice.
I will say that most of the villages that I have seen were abandoned 30
- 40 years ago, and are made up of small stone cottages, a few larger
ones and usually a small church/ chapel.
--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "tibrvtvs" <tibrvtvs@...> wrote:
>
> Salvete Omnes!
>
> I am the Procurator of Sarmatia prov. Titus Iunius Brutus. I was very
interested with discussion about establishment of a Nova Roman village
like http://vikingvisits.co.uk/ in one of abandoned villages of the
Mediterranean countries. As I know, there are a lot of abandoned
settlements close to tourist sites. We can use one of such villages as a
base for true Roman Settlement. We can organize tours to this Settlement
and earn some money for development.
> No doubt, we can't find a lot of people which can live in Roman
Settlement continuously. But Nova Romans can live there by turns, over a
period of few weeks. Reconstructors from the entire world will have
opportunity to become a true Roman for a while.
> THE KEY QUESTION AT THE MOMENT IS - DOES ANY KIND OF GOVERNMENT
PROGRAMS OF RESTORING OF ABANDONED VILLAGES EXIST IN MEDITERRANEAN. FOR
THE BEGINNING, WE NEED APPROVAL TO SETTLE SUCH A VILLAGE AND SOME KIND
OF REGISTATION AS A TOURIST SPOT.
> I adress this message to everybody who can help. Thank you.
>



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75873 From: iulius sabinus Date: 2010-05-20
Subject: Re: REAL NOVA ROMAN VILLAGE
SALVE ET SALVETE!
 
For Hispania option but not only, one can find interesting ideas in Magister Avitus message, two and a half years ago:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma/message/53747%c2%a0
 
VALE ET VALETE,
T. Iulius Sabinus

"Every individual is the architect of his own fortune" - Appius Claudius

--- On Thu, 5/20/10, lucius_aelius_paetus <franklinmoore@...> wrote:


From: lucius_aelius_paetus <franklinmoore@...>
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: REAL NOVA ROMAN VILLAGE
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Date: Thursday, May 20, 2010, 7:44 PM


 



Salve, I think your idea sounds very interesting. I know that Spain
has numerous abandoned villages and a quick google search found an
article indicating that there maybe some governmental grant money
available for those who wish to buy and restore them. Take a look at
this
<http://www.costaeye.com/article/abandoned-villages-of-aragon/#/images/s\
ized/images/articles/DSCF4445-573x354.JPG> , as an example. A few years
ago I stayed at an restored village in Soria which had been converted to
a rural hotel (each guest got a restored cottage). It was quite nice.
I will say that most of the villages that I have seen were abandoned 30
- 40 years ago, and are made up of small stone cottages, a few larger
ones and usually a small church/ chapel.
--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "tibrvtvs" <tibrvtvs@...> wrote:
>
> Salvete Omnes!
>
> I am the Procurator of Sarmatia prov. Titus Iunius Brutus. I was very
interested with discussion about establishment of a Nova Roman village
like http://vikingvisits.co.uk/ in one of abandoned villages of the
Mediterranean countries. As I know, there are a lot of abandoned
settlements close to tourist sites. We can use one of such villages as a
base for true Roman Settlement. We can organize tours to this Settlement
and earn some money for development.
> No doubt, we can't find a lot of people which can live in Roman
Settlement continuously. But Nova Romans can live there by turns, over a
period of few weeks. Reconstructors from the entire world will have
opportunity to become a true Roman for a while.
> THE KEY QUESTION AT THE MOMENT IS - DOES ANY KIND OF GOVERNMENT
PROGRAMS OF RESTORING OF ABANDONED VILLAGES EXIST IN MEDITERRANEAN. FOR
THE BEGINNING, WE NEED APPROVAL TO SETTLE SUCH A VILLAGE AND SOME KIND
OF REGISTATION AS A TOURIST SPOT.
> I adress this message to everybody who can help. Thank you.
>

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]











[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75874 From: rory12001 Date: 2010-05-20
Subject: Re: REAL NOVA ROMAN VILLAGE
Salvete;
there is a yahoo group for a Roman colony
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Coloniae-Romanae/ but it has been quiet, I am interested and I know other Nova Romans are.L. Livia Plauta envisaged a colony as living archeology, A. Garseius Avitus sees it hosting (and supporting) itself through living Latin semesters. I am in favour of both and also a holiday retreat. I'd love to talk to my neighbor about philosophy:)
optime vale
Maior

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, iulius sabinus <iulius_sabinus@...> wrote:
>
> SALVE ET SALVETE!
>  
> For Hispania option but not only, one can find interesting ideas in Magister Avitus message, two and a half years ago:
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma/message/53747%c3%82%c2%a0
>  
> VALE ET VALETE,
> T. Iulius Sabinus
>
> "Every individual is the architect of his own fortune" - Appius Claudius
>
> --- On Thu, 5/20/10, lucius_aelius_paetus <franklinmoore@...> wrote:
>
>
> From: lucius_aelius_paetus <franklinmoore@...>
> Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: REAL NOVA ROMAN VILLAGE
> To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> Date: Thursday, May 20, 2010, 7:44 PM
>
>
>  
>
>
>
> Salve, I think your idea sounds very interesting. I know that Spain
> has numerous abandoned villages and a quick google search found an
> article indicating that there maybe some governmental grant money
> available for those who wish to buy and restore them. Take a look at
> this
> <http://www.costaeye.com/article/abandoned-villages-of-aragon/#/images/s\
> ized/images/articles/DSCF4445-573x354.JPG> , as an example. A few years
> ago I stayed at an restored village in Soria which had been converted to
> a rural hotel (each guest got a restored cottage). It was quite nice.
> I will say that most of the villages that I have seen were abandoned 30
> - 40 years ago, and are made up of small stone cottages, a few larger
> ones and usually a small church/ chapel.
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "tibrvtvs" <tibrvtvs@> wrote:
> >
> > Salvete Omnes!
> >
> > I am the Procurator of Sarmatia prov. Titus Iunius Brutus. I was very
> interested with discussion about establishment of a Nova Roman village
> like http://vikingvisits.co.uk/ in one of abandoned villages of the
> Mediterranean countries. As I know, there are a lot of abandoned
> settlements close to tourist sites. We can use one of such villages as a
> base for true Roman Settlement. We can organize tours to this Settlement
> and earn some money for development.
> > No doubt, we can't find a lot of people which can live in Roman
> Settlement continuously. But Nova Romans can live there by turns, over a
> period of few weeks. Reconstructors from the entire world will have
> opportunity to become a true Roman for a while.
> > THE KEY QUESTION AT THE MOMENT IS - DOES ANY KIND OF GOVERNMENT
> PROGRAMS OF RESTORING OF ABANDONED VILLAGES EXIST IN MEDITERRANEAN. FOR
> THE BEGINNING, WE NEED APPROVAL TO SETTLE SUCH A VILLAGE AND SOME KIND
> OF REGISTATION AS A TOURIST SPOT.
> > I adress this message to everybody who can help. Thank you.
> >
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75875 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2010-05-20
Subject: Re: REAL NOVA ROMAN VILLAGE
>
>
> A. Tullia Scholastica M. Hortensiae Majori T. Julio Sabino L. Aelio Paeto
> quiritibus, sociis, peregrinisque bonae voluntatis S.P.D.
>
> Indeed there is a group with this focus, and I encourage everyone
> interested in founding an actual Roman colony, perhaps in such an abandoned
> village, to join us. IMHO, we should have several such colonies throughout
> the world, for travel expenses and language barriers should be minimized. Of
> course, one of the better ways to deal with the latter is [guess what?] to
> learn Latin, which works very well in uniting people who have mutually
> unintelligible national languages; Avitus has a lovely video of that sort of
> thing during an Academia Latinitati Fovendae meeting some years ago in
> Finland. It is wonderful to see dozens of people speaking nothing but Latin,
> people from Hungary and Bulgaria and Finland and France and Germany and Russia
> and Italy and Spain and the US, inter alias, chatting away in this language
> some consider a cadaver, fit only for antiquarian studies. It is also rather
> empowering for me to actually understand what they are saying. ;-))) You,
> too, can understand this video! And other people speaking Latin, too, but you
> must study Latin, especially the Sermo courses, though I recommend that those
> be taken after a grounding in more basic Latin, whether in the Grammatica
> courses or in school or college; many of the latter use the same text I do in
> Grammatica, but probably don¹t add modern Latin and other topics not covered
> by Wheelock.
>
> As for the colonies themselves, there are several possible means of
> support above and beyond tourism and Latin instruction. One we have mentioned
> is arts and crafts, and another is agriculture, for many do visit produce
> stands. Granted, most of us have little or no expertise in this area, but
> possibly in the more rural areas some could be found who are both
> knowledgeable and physically capable of farming, perhaps even using Roman
> methods. The recession effectively put a stop to any discussion of land
> purchases on our part, but perhaps a white knight (or Daddy Warbucks) will
> emerge.
>
> Wish I had more time to discuss this, but am rather occupied in exam
> correction, having begun the first section of the Grammatica I final in the
> wee hours. Be afraid, discipuli, be very afraid, for I must soon resume this
> task...though it is somewhat easier when the students don¹t answer the
> questions (as happened with this group), for I can simply give zero rather
> than supply the correct answer and perhaps partial credit. ;-)
>
> Valete!
>
>
> Salvete;
> there is a yahoo group for a Roman colony
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Coloniae-Romanae/ but it has been quiet, I am
> interested and I know other Nova Romans are.L. Livia Plauta envisaged a colony
> as living archeology, A. Garseius Avitus sees it hosting (and supporting)
> itself through living Latin semesters. I am in favour of both and also a
> holiday retreat. I'd love to talk to my neighbor about philosophy:)
> optime vale
> Maior
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com <mailto:Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com> , iulius
> sabinus <iulius_sabinus@...> wrote:
>> >
>> > SALVE ET SALVETE!
>> >  
>> > For Hispania option but not only, one can find interesting ideas in
>> Magister Avitus message, two and a half years ago:
>> > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma/message/53747%c3%82%c2%a0
>> >  
>> > VALE ET VALETE,
>> > T. Iulius Sabinus
>> >
>> > "Every individual is the architect of his own fortune" - Appius Claudius
>> >
>> > --- On Thu, 5/20/10, lucius_aelius_paetus <franklinmoore@...> wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> > From: lucius_aelius_paetus <franklinmoore@...>
>> > Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: REAL NOVA ROMAN VILLAGE
>> > To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com <mailto:Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com>
>> > Date: Thursday, May 20, 2010, 7:44 PM
>> >
>> >
>> >  
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > Salve, I think your idea sounds very interesting. I know that Spain
>> > has numerous abandoned villages and a quick google search found an
>> > article indicating that there maybe some governmental grant money
>> > available for those who wish to buy and restore them. Take a look at
>> > this
>> > <http://www.costaeye.com/article/abandoned-villages-of-aragon/#/images/s\
> <http://www.costaeye.com/article/abandoned-villages-of-aragon/#/images/s> >
> ized/images/articles/DSCF4445-573x354.JPG> , as an example. A few years
>> > ago I stayed at an restored village in Soria which had been converted to
>> > a rural hotel (each guest got a restored cottage). It was quite nice.
>> > I will say that most of the villages that I have seen were abandoned 30
>> > - 40 years ago, and are made up of small stone cottages, a few larger
>> > ones and usually a small church/ chapel.
>> > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com <mailto:Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com> ,
>> "tibrvtvs" <tibrvtvs@> wrote:
>>> > >
>>> > > Salvete Omnes!
>>> > >
>>> > > I am the Procurator of Sarmatia prov. Titus Iunius Brutus. I was very
>> > interested with discussion about establishment of a Nova Roman village
>> > like http://vikingvisits.co.uk/ in one of abandoned villages of the
>> > Mediterranean countries. As I know, there are a lot of abandoned
>> > settlements close to tourist sites. We can use one of such villages as a
>> > base for true Roman Settlement. We can organize tours to this Settlement
>> > and earn some money for development.
>>> > > No doubt, we can't find a lot of people which can live in Roman
>> > Settlement continuously. But Nova Romans can live there by turns, over a
>> > period of few weeks. Reconstructors from the entire world will have
>> > opportunity to become a true Roman for a while.
>>> > > THE KEY QUESTION AT THE MOMENT IS - DOES ANY KIND OF GOVERNMENT
>> > PROGRAMS OF RESTORING OF ABANDONED VILLAGES EXIST IN MEDITERRANEAN. FOR
>> > THE BEGINNING, WE NEED APPROVAL TO SETTLE SUCH A VILLAGE AND SOME KIND
>> > OF REGISTATION AS A TOURIST SPOT.
>>> > > I adress this message to everybody who can help. Thank you.
>>> > >
>> >
>> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75876 From: Christer Edling Date: 2010-05-20
Subject: PROGRAM of the FIRST INTERNATIONAL CONSULAR CONVENTUS IN ROME - URBS
Salvete Quirites!

Below You wil find the final program for the First Consular Conventus
in Rome. My Cohors and our Italian friends are working hard to set up
a successful Conventus without making things too complicated. More
information will follow.

**********

PROGRAM of the FIRST INTERNATIONAL CONSULAR CONVENTUS IN ROME - URBS
ROMÆ, 17-20 June 2010

[The participants to the Conventus shall be divided in 2 groups as
follows: GROUP A will attend NR-related meetings and talks, GROUP B
will enjoy a guided tour of Rome.]

Thursday 17 June 2010

-10 am to 2pm : GROUP A AND B) - visit
-2:15 pm – 4 pm: Dinner at local restaurant
-4:15 pm – 6/6:30 pm :
GROUP A and B: Meeting, General and formal beginning;
GROUP B: Visit to St. Peter's Cathedral
-7 pm – 10 pm: Supper (GROUP A and Swedish citizens of GROUP B); Meet
and Greet Novi Romani

Friday 18 June 2010

-Sunrise Ritual

-9 am to 4 pm:
GROUP A: Meeting among All Senatores and magistrates.

-4:15 pm – 6 pm: Visit to Roman Forum, Palatine Hill and Trajan
Markets. (Both groups - citizens in Group B who wish to participate
are welcome)

Saturday 19 June 2010

-Sunrise Ritual

-10 am to 2pm: Meetings and Presentations with Italians.
- 2:15 pm – 4 pm: Dinner at local restaurant
- 4:15 pm – 6 pm:
GROUP A: Meeting among all NR citizens
GROUP B: Walking visit to Campo Marzio (Crypta Balbi, Sacred Area of
Largo Argentina, Augustus Mausoleum and Ara Pacis)
7 pm – 10 pm: Supper and conversation and meeting with Italian
leadership.

Sunday 20 June 2010

8am to 10am (to be possibly changed): Meeting of the Cohortes (GROUP A)
-2:15 pm – 4 pm: Dinner with Meetings and Presentations
-4:15 pm – 6 pm:: Free Time
-7 pm – 10 pm: Supper (for those who are leaving in the morning)

Monday 21 June 2010

-10 am to 2pm (GROUP B):
The other hills: from The Capitol to the Cælian hill, across the
Exquiline, Quirinal and Viminal hills Tour (a long list of monuments
will be presented).

On a daily basis, the participants may be freely choose to be part of
one group of the others.

****************

There are audo guides and mp3 guided tours for Kindle and iPhone:

http://www.italyguides.it/us/roma/download_audioguide/free_ipod_mp3/ipodguides.htm
http://astore.amazon.com/novrom-20?_encoding=UTF8&node=27

****************

Here are some apartments/villas that are reasonable and all have wifi
or interent access (prices are USD):

http://www.tripadvisor.com/VacationRentalReview-g187791-d1514617-Rome_Quiet_Home_Casa_Marzia_short_rent_apartment-Rome_Lazio.html

from $24



http://www.tripadvisor.com/VacationRentalReview-g187791-d1755730-Suites_Forum-Rome_Lazio.html

from $53 internet access


http://www.tripadvisor.com/VacationRentalReview-g187791-d1743620-Domus_Trastevere_magnificent_home-Rome_Lazio.html

$82 per night 3 bedrooms sleeps 5 internet access


http://www.tripadvisor.com/VacationRentalReview-g187791-d1486873-B_B_Domus_Caracalla_in_Rome_near_the_Colosseum-Rome_Lazio.html

from $70 breakfast included internet access


http://www.tripadvisor.com/VacationRentalReview-g187791-d1643777-Margot_family_treatment_confort_and_armony-Rome_Lazio.html

from $75 internet access


http://www.tripadvisor.com/VacationRentalReview-g187791-d1440182-Cozy_Central_Minerva_Apt_hot_tub_sat_wifi_phone-Rome_Lazio.html

2 BR sleeps 5 wi-fi from $123 per night


http://www.tripadvisor.com/VacationRentalReview-g187791-d1743167-Auditorium_di_Mecenate-Rome_Lazio.html

from $105 wifi – guest house


*****************
Vale

Caeso Fabius Buteo Quintilianus

Consul Iterum
Princeps Senatus et Flamen Palatualis
Civis Romanus sum
http://www.novaroma.org/nr/Main_Page
************************************************
Aut inveniam viam aut faciam
"I'll either find a way or make one"
************************************************
Dignitas, Iustitia, Fidelitas et Pietas
Dignity, Justice, Loyalty and Dutifulness
************************************************
Mons Palatinus, Clivus Victoriae
Palatine Hill, Incline of Victoriae
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75877 From: rory12001 Date: 2010-05-20
Subject: Philosophy is fashionable
M. Hortensia quiritibus spd;
here is a link to articles on the relevance of ancient philosophy, one from a well-know u.s. blog the huffington post and the other The New York Times newspaper.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/tom-morris/what-is-philosophy-its-no_b_581506.html

enjoy & let the discussions begin. I'm reading Pierre Hadot, an influential French scholar, an expert on ancient philosophy. Though he gets theurgy all wrong;-)
optime vale
Maior
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75878 From: Maxima Valeria Messallina Date: 2010-05-20
Subject: Re: REAL NOVA ROMAN VILLAGE
Salve,
 
I didn't even know we had such a group! Thank you for letting us know. I joined today.
When my former apprentices had been living with me, we discussed how to raise money to build a Temple to Vesta and recreate not just the College of the Vestals proper, but a sisterhood, albeit a minor one, that would allow all women devoted to Great Vesta to join, through the Internet as well as in person. We thought to offer retreats for women throughout the year and have certain festivals open to the public, including a big do-to for Vestalia.
I like these other ideas, too. Whatever we end up doing, I think it is very important that we find creative ways to be self-supporting so those living in these colonies don't have to go outside of them to work. I guess that would be the ideal.
 
Valete bene,
 
Maxima Valeria Messallina
 
 


<<--- On Thu, 5/20/10, rory12001 <rory12001@...> wrote:

 
Salvete;
there is a yahoo group for a Roman colony
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Coloniae-Romanae/ but it has been quiet, I am interested and I know other Nova Romans are.L. Livia Plauta envisaged a colony as living archeology, A. Garseius Avitus sees it hosting (and supporting) itself through living Latin semesters. I am in favour of both and also a holiday retreat. I'd love to talk to my neighbor about philosophy:)
optime vale
Maior>>




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75880 From: marcushoratius Date: 2010-05-21
Subject: a. d. XII Kalendas Iunonias: AGONALIA
M. Moravius Piscinus Horatianus Quiritibus cultoribus Deorum et omnibus salutem plurimam dicit: Salvete, vosque bona Iuppiter auctet ope.

Hodie est ante diem XII Kalendas Iunonias; haec dies nefastus est: AGONALIA; Vediovi; Suculae exoriuntur, septentrionales venti, nonnumquam Auster cum pluvia.

Felices natalis Diana ! Venus te complectimini dulce.

"The Pleiades rise in the morning with a northernly wind, or sometimes a sourthernly wind brings rain." ~ Columella, De Re Rustica 9.2.43

Agonalia

"The dies Agonales, on which the Rex Sacrorum sacrifices a ram in the Regia, were named 'agon' for this reason, because the Minister Sacrificii asks, 'Agone?' ('Shall I do my work?') Unless it is from the Greek, where agon means princeps (leader), from the fact that the sacrificing is done by the leader of the State and the leader of the flock is sacrificed." ~ M. Terrentius Varro, Lingua Latinae 6.12

Four days each year the Rex Sacrorum made this sacrifice in the Regia, on 9 January, 17 March (Liberalia), 21 May, and 11 December. The sacrifices were made respectively to Jupiter, Mars, Vediovis, and to an unknown God in the last instance. The other days on which sacrifices were offered to Vediovis were 1 January, marking the anniversary of His fanum on the Tiber Isle, and on the Nones of March for the anniversary of His temple in the saddle between the Arx and the Capitolium. In His temple on the Capitoline Hill, a statue portrayed Vediovis as a youthful man that "holds arrows, which, as everyone knows, are devised to inflict harm; for that reason it has often been said that that God is Apollo; and a she-goat is sacrificed to Him in the customary fashion, and a representation of that animal stands near his statue (A. Gellius, Noctes Atticae 5.12.11-12)"

The identity of Vediovis with Apollo, based solely on His statue holding arrows, is late and comes from Greek notions. We are told in Livy how a shrine to Vediovis was on the Capitoline Hill prior to the construction of the Capitolium in a period of Roman history before the introduction of statuary depicting any of the Roman deities. Additionally, when Apollo was introduced to Rome, He came in response to a plague as Apollo Medicus and so remained on the Campus Martius until the reign of Augustus Caesar. Alternately Vediovis was thought to be a young Jupiter, the she-goat representing the goat that suckled Jupiter while He was hidden from His father Saturnus. The Capitoline Hill was originally named the Saturnine Hill. This interpretation, too, is later and based in Greek myth. Such explanations shed no light on Vediovis or on His cultus.

Ovid, Gellius, and later scholars have pointed to how His name is composed by adding the prefix 've-' to a much earlier name for Jupiter, Diovis. Elsewhere, where the prefix 've-' appears, it means 'diminutive' or 'evil,' the opposite of the meaning of the word to which it is attached. Thus it is posed that Vediovis might be a diminutive, i. e. younger version of Jupiter. Otherwise He might be assumed to have been an evil aspect of Jupiter. But neither proposal would explain Vediovis. He does seem to be an Underworld deity, and to be distinct from Jupiter. For one thing, while a she-goat is specifically said to be sacrificed to Him, the chief priest of Jupiter, the flamen Dialis is forbidden "to touch, or even to name, a she-goat" (A. Gellius, Noctes Atticae 10.15.12). It is unusal, too, that a female sacrifice should be designated for a God. The shrines of Vediovis lay outside the poemerium, those of Jupiter inside. As with Apollo, the arrows that He holds could represent disease, which was thought to come from the Underworld. Vediovis appears as one of the deities of the Underworld, alongside and distinct from Dis Pater, to which Scipio Africanus Aemilianus devotes Carthage in 146 BCE (Macrobius, Saturnalia 3.9.10-11). Then of course there is this festival, the third dies Agonalis of the year, dedicated to Him in the month of May, in which there are several other festivals devoted to the Manes. If Vediovis is a princeps in the Underworld, and yet not Dis Pater, then He might be thought as the first among the Manes, and that might point to Remus. We may be able to point to how Ovid derived the name of Lemuria by saying that originally it was named Remuria after Remus. Also we see how Ovid raised the Shade of Remus on the first day of Lemuria (9 May) to tell his story and contrast him with Romulus. Did Remus descend into the Underworld as Vediovis, just as Romulus was to ascend in the Heavens as Quirinus? If such an identity ever existed, it, too, I think, would have been a later development. Secondly the Agonalia dedicated to Vediovis occurs seven days, inclusive, from the Ides of May. While the other lunar divisions of the month held special rites on the Kalends, Nones, and Ides for celestial deities, the Last Quarter, not mentioned in calendar notation or by Cato, was instead said to be dedicated to the Manes. As in the case with the festival of Faunus falling on the Nones of December, and from the commentary by Probus on Virgil's Georgic I.10 where he says that, "In Italy, whatever sort of sacrifice they offer annually is celebrated monthly," we thereby assume that the Nones of each month may have been dedicated to Faunus originally; it may be that this Last Quarter, which we know involved rites for the Manes, may have originally involved Vediovis. The only fact that can be definitively stated is that little of Vediovis is known, or was known even by the Romans of the Late Republic.


"Why is the so-called Rex Sacrorum, that is to say, the 'king of sacred rites,' forbidden to hold office or to address the people? Is it because in early times the kings performed the greater part of the most important rites, and themselves offered the sacrifices with the assistance of the priests? But when they did not practice moderation, but were arrogant and oppressive, most of the Greek states took away their authority, and left to them only the offering of sacrifices to the Gods; but the Romans expelled the kings altogether, and to offer the sacrifices they appointed another, whom they did not allow to hold office or to address the people, so that in their sacred rites only they might seem to be subject to a king, and to tolerate a kingship only on account of the Gods. At any rate, there is a sacrifice traditionally performed in the forum at the place called Comitium, and, when the Rex has performed this, he flees from the forum as fast as he can." ~ Plutarch, Roman Questions 63


AUC 324 / 429 BCE: Birth of Plato.

AUC 823 / 70 CE: Legions under Titus Flavius break through the middle wall into rebellious Jerusalem.

AUC 946 / 193 CE: Septimus Severus saluted by legions as imperator.

AUC 1046 / 293 CE: Diocletianus elevates Galerius to the rank of Caesar.


Our thought for today is from Demophilus 16.

"The self-sufficient and needy philosopher lives a life truly similar to Divinity, and considers the non-possession of external and unnecessary goods as the greatest wealth. For the acquisition of riches sometimes inflames desire; but not to act in any respect unjustly is sufficient to the enjoyment of a blessed life."
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75881 From: Cn. Cornelius Lentulus Date: 2010-05-21
Subject: Tomorrow: NR Floralia Carnival in Aquincum (Budapest, Hungary)
Cn. Cornelius Lentulus, leg. pr. pr. Pannoniae, pontifex Quiritibus sal.


I announce you the good news, tomorrow the Floralia of Aquincum in my province will start. Thanks to the Gods, and to the services of my proquaestrix Livia Plauta, our preparations went well, now we expect the 2 days festivity with thousands of visitors attending and seeing the flag of Nova Roma will go well, too.

We celebrate the 2000th anniversary of occupying (south) Pannonia by the Romans this year, as we did last year. These are the two years of the 2000th anniversary of Pannonia.

To celebrate this jubilee, Nova Roman citizens from Italia and Dacia have come to our province Pannonia, Iulia Flamma and M. Prometheus Decius Golia, and many other Nova Romans from different parts of Pannonia, so this is an Internatinal Nova Roman event, the second time.

I am glad to announce that Marcus Prometheus arrived well and safe, he is among us.

Tomorrow we will conduct a huge public sacrifices, before the local media, attended by hundreds of people. We will pray to Dea Pannonia, Flora, Dea Concodia and to Iuppiter to bless our Republic, the New Roman Nation, our families and our lives, and may They give Pannonia a rebirth.


Please, citizens! Pray for the success of our Carnival Saturday and Sunday!

Pray for Nova Roma in Pannonia, and for the 2000 years old Pannonia.


Curate ut valeatis!

CN LENTVLVS
LEGATVS PRO PRAETORE
PANNONIAE SPQNR
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75882 From: C.Maria Caeca Date: 2010-05-21
Subject: Re: Tomorrow: NR Floralia Carnival in Aquincum (Budapest, Hungary)
Caeca Lentulo Sal,

I wish you great joy and full success of your festival, and delighted that our banner will fly proudly before so many people! You and yours are truly an inspiration to all of us!

Vale quam optime,
C. Maria Caeca

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75883 From: petronius_dexter Date: 2010-05-22
Subject: Re: Tomorrow: NR Floralia Carnival in Aquincum (Budapest, Hungary)
C. Petronius Cn. Lentulo suo salutem,

> I announce you the good news, tomorrow the Floralia of Aquincum in my province will start.

Have good Floralia. Unfortunately, this year, I can be among all you but I hope that you will have beautiful days. I have to go to the Greco-Latin festival in the Luxembourg (28-30 may) with some members of the circulus Latinus Lutetiensis.

I will be with you mentally.

> Thanks to the Gods, and to the services of my proquaestrix Livia Plauta, our preparations went well, now we expect the 2 days festivity with thousands of visitors attending and seeing the flag of Nova Roma will go well, too.

Warm "Ave!" to the legionaries of the XXI Rapax!

> We celebrate the 2000th anniversary of occupying (south) Pannonia by the Romans this year, as we did last year. These are the two years of the 2000th anniversary of Pannonia.

Bis repetita placent.

> Please, citizens! Pray for the success of our Carnival Saturday and Sunday!

Gods be with you!

Optime vale.

C. Petronius Dexter
Arcoiali scribebat
A. d. XI Kalendas Iunias P. Memmio K. Fabio II coss.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75884 From: marcus.lucretius Date: 2010-05-22
Subject: Re: Tomorrow: NR Floralia Carnival in Aquincum (Budapest, Hungary)
M. Lucretius Agricola Cn. Cornelio Lentulo SPD

May Iuppiter, Fortuna and all the gods favor you and all the citizens there with you in this wonderful work.

We owe you a great debt of thanks for all of your many works, but especially for the way that you bring our culture alive, not only for the citizens near you, but for all of the public.

bene vale in cura deorum




--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Cn. Cornelius Lentulus" <cn_corn_lent@...> wrote:
>
> Cn. Cornelius Lentulus, leg. pr. pr. Pannoniae, pontifex Quiritibus sal.
>
>
> I announce you the good news, tomorrow the Floralia of Aquincum in my province will start. Thanks to the Gods, and to the services of my proquaestrix Livia Plauta, our preparations went well, now we expect the 2 days festivity with thousands of visitors attending and seeing the flag of Nova Roma will go well, too.
>
> We celebrate the 2000th anniversary of occupying (south) Pannonia by the Romans this year, as we did last year. These are the two years of the 2000th anniversary of Pannonia.
>
> To celebrate this jubilee, Nova Roman citizens from Italia and Dacia have come to our province Pannonia, Iulia Flamma and M. Prometheus Decius Golia, and many other Nova Romans from different parts of Pannonia, so this is an Internatinal Nova Roman event, the second time.
>
> I am glad to announce that Marcus Prometheus arrived well and safe, he is among us.
>
> Tomorrow we will conduct a huge public sacrifices, before the local media, attended by hundreds of people. We will pray to Dea Pannonia, Flora, Dea Concodia and to Iuppiter to bless our Republic, the New Roman Nation, our families and our lives, and may They give Pannonia a rebirth.
>
>
> Please, citizens! Pray for the success of our Carnival Saturday and Sunday!
>
> Pray for Nova Roma in Pannonia, and for the 2000 years old Pannonia.
>
>
> Curate ut valeatis!
>
> CN LENTVLVS
> LEGATVS PRO PRAETORE
> PANNONIAE SPQNR
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75885 From: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com Date: 2010-05-22
Subject: Reminder Ludi Apollinares, 5/22/2010, 12:00 pm
Reminder from:   Nova-Roma Yahoo! Group
 
Title:   Reminder Ludi Apollinares
 
Date:   Saturday May 22, 2010
Time:   12:00 pm - 1:00 pm
Repeats:   This event repeats every week until Friday July 9, 2010.
Location:   Ludi Apollinares
Notes:   Don't forget to be inspired and start your project for the Ludi honoring Apollo!

http://www.novaroma.org/nr/MMDCCLXIII/Ludi_Apollinares
 
Copyright © 2010  Yahoo! Inc. All Rights Reserved | Terms of Service | Privacy Policy
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75886 From: marcushoratius Date: 2010-05-22
Subject: a. d. XI Kalendas Iunonias: Death of Constantine
M. Moravius Piscinus Horatianus Quiritibus cultoribus Deorum et omnibus salutem plurimam dicit: Optime vos omnes

Hodie est ante diem XI Kalendas Iunonias; haec dies nefastus est: Arcturus mane occidit, tempestatem significat.

"All planting should be done when the moon is increasing." ~ Palladius Rutilius 1.6.12

Today the moon sits on the celestial equator as she approaches a conjunction with Saturnus tomorrow night in Leo. Now in her ninth day, the moon benefits runagating your garden, according to Vergil (Georg. 1290) , and increases as we near the full moon on 27 May. It was thought by the Romans that the moon caused heavy dews, which benefited young crops. The thought also occured to Greeks and Romans that with the growing size of the moon each month, the time of the heaviest dews was around the day of the Full Moon. Thus the advice to plant as the moon increase.


AUC 419 / 344 BCE: Alexander the Great defeats the Persians at the Battle of the GranicusRiver.

After crossing into Asia, Alexander stopped at Troy to visit the grave of Achilles. Meanwhile the satraps of the region, including Ionian Greeks, gathered their forces and formed them not far from Troy, along the Granicus River. They had placed their cavalry foreward to screen the passage across the river, with light infantry in support. Coming upon the Persians, Alexander decided upon an immediate attack. First he feinted on the left, then personally led the charge of his cavalry on the right, crossing at a lightly defended ford. The Persians threw everything they had available to confront Alexander's crossing, which only weakened them at the decisive point. The Macedonian phalanxes of heavy infantry engaged the Persian center of some cavalry and light infantry, rather easily breaking through the Persians. The combination of Alexander and the Campanions assaulting the Persian left and the Macedonian phalanxes in the center were more than the light Persian forces could handle. At most the Persians had placed themselves in a delaying position, but had nothing with which to support the position. It was several months before the Persians were able to raise an army capable of engaging Alexander.


AUC 1090 / 337 CE: Death of Constantine.

With the death of his father, Emperor Constantius (25 July 306 CE), the legions in Britannia declared Constantinus Caesar. This was to set off a power struggle over the next several years. Constantinus, though, did not enter into the fight until 312, when he marched against Maxentius. Besieging a force at Verona, Constantinus moved a detachment towards Rome. He declared having had a vision and ordered that the shields of his army therefore to be painted with the sign of the radiant sun, Sol Invictus. This was the imperial cultus of the time. The cross represented the course of the sun through the equinoxes and solstices. The emblem seen as Chi-Rho represented the dawning sun. It was not until very late in the reign of Constantinus that these emblems were adopted as Christian symbols. The emperor was by then attributing the success of his reign to the Christian God, at least when addressing his Christian subjects. Until the end of his life Constantinus does not seem to have been exclusively devoted to Sol Invictus, to the Christian God, or to any other deity.

In the following year Licinius, colleague of Constantinus in the East, defeated Maximianus Daia (313 CE). Then Constantinus and Licinius came to blows at Cibalae (8 Oct. 314) and at Castra Jarba (Nov. 314). This led to an uneasy truce that was to last until 322. A decisive battle was fought at Andrianople (3 July 324), where the more disciplined army of Constantinus defeated the larger force of Licinius. Constantinus was then able to cross the Bosporus following a storm that had destroyed around a third of the Licinian fleet. Constantinus won another battle at Chrysopolis and Licinus, who had withdrawn on Nicomedia, surrendered. Constantinus allowed Licinius to remain as Emperor in the East, although with a much reduced realm. When their disputes again arose the Roman Senate condemned Licinius and had him executed (325).

Against this background of political turmoil and civil wars, Constantinus developed his religious policies. First was the issuance of the Edict of Milan that offered tolerance towards Christians and returned confiscated property. He first imposed himself into a North African religious dispute when he called an assembly of bishops to meet at Arles. This led to the condemnation of Donatism and in 316 Constantinus led the first Christian army on a crusade against fellow Christians. More famously he convoked the Council of Nicacea (325) in an attempt to allay the dispute between Alexander and Arius of Alexandria. Arius followed the teachings of Lucian of Antioch, as did Eusebius of Nicomedia. Helena, mother of Constantinus, was devoted to Lucian. She was to build a church in Lucian's honor in the city named after her, Helenopolis on the Gulf of Izmet. Constantinus' sister, Constantia, adopted the more developed Arianism. Constantia was married to her brother's rival, Emperor Licinius. Arianism viewed Jesus as the son of God, and although considering him as a God existing prior to the creation, none the less taught that Jesus came after God and was therefore somewhat less divine. In other words Arianism made a distinction between father and son as where Plato distinguished between the One and the One That Is. In contrast Alexander of Alexandria held to an obstinate monotheism that led to a Trinitarian theology that saw the demiurgic Father and Jesus as two aspects of one and the same God. The Council of Nicaea eventually saw 318 bishops arrive, including some arriving from outside of the Empire, as well as hundreds of other Christian priests and deacons. Bishops began to arrive on 20/21 May, 325, but the council did not really begin until the arrival of Constantinus in early June.

Perhaps known mostly for its rejection of Arianism, the Council of Nicaea also rejected Melitianism, and most importantly sanctioned Christian persecution towards Jews. Constantinus forbade Jews to own Christian slaves or to convert their slaves to Judaism. He outlawed Christians from converting to Judaism, with their property subject to confiscation. In contrast Jews were forbidden from bothering any Jew who converted to Christianity. The date on which Easter was celebrated was no longer to be tied to the Jewish calendar; that is, on 13 Nisan, the day before Passover. Other restrictions were placed on Jewish worship, such as the lighting of fires at certain festivals. Jews were permitted to enter Jerusalem only on Tisha B'Av, which is the anniversary of the destruction of the Temple of Jerusalem. Under Roman Jews did gain some protection afterward. No one was permitted to disturb Jewish worship on a Sabbath or other Jewish holidays, nor were they permitted to call Jews to court on these days.

The year after the Council of Nicaea, Constantinus ordered his eldest son Crispus executed (between 15 May and 17 June 326 CE). Then in July, at the insistence of his mother Helena, Constantinus ordered his wife Fausta to be left to die by suffocation in an overheated bath. Crispus was the son of Constantinus' first wife, Minervina. It was posed centuries later that, like Phaedra and Hippolytus in myth, Fausta had accused Crispus of rape, or otherwise of an illicit relationship. It is assumed that she posed a false accusation in order that her own sons might inherit the throne. Then when the accusation was found to be untrue, Constantinus had Fausta killed. Only three years earlier Constantius had Fausta declared Augusta, rather than Nobilissima Femina. Another possibility posed that Helena's disapproval of her daughter-in-law may have been that Fausta had converted to Judaism years earlier. Or it could have been a simpler rivalry. It is not certain that Helena was married to Constantinus' father or was instead his concubine. At any rate, Helena, of humble birth, was put aside and Constantius married Theodora, the step daughter of Emperor Maximianus. Fausta Flavia was the daughter of Emperor Maximianus. In deference to his mother's wishes, Fausta was also condemned to a damnatio memoriae, with orders to remove her name from all inscriptions. However, in the same year of her death the mint at Constantinople issued coins of Fausta Augusta as Salus.

Constantinus fell ill during the feast of Easter, 337 CE. He left Constantinople for Helenopolis to pray in the Church of Lucian of Antioch. Then stopping in Nicomedia on his return to Constantinople, he asked the Arian bishop Eusebius of Nicomedia to baptize him. It was shortly afterward that he died in the villa Achyron outside Nicomedia. The Empire was then divided between the sons of Fausta: Constantinus II, Constantius II, and Constans. Their own rivalries brought about their demise, and it was their sister Helena instead who became Empress with her husband Julian the Blessed in 361.


Our thought for today is from Marcus Aurelius, Meditations 5.7:

"A prayer of the Athenians: Rain, rain, O dear Zeus, down on the ploughed fields of the Athenians and on the plains.- In truth we ought to pray in this simple and noble fashion, or we ought not to pray at all."
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75888 From: gualterus_graecus Date: 2010-05-22
Subject: Re: a. d. XI Kalendas Iunonias: Death of Constantine
Salve,

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "marcushoratius" <MHoratius@...> wrote:
>
...
> Against this background of political turmoil and civil wars, Constantinus developed his religious policies. First was the issuance of the Edict of Milan that offered tolerance towards Christians and returned confiscated property.
...

Actually, it's more complicated than this. Constantine first issued an edit of restoration in 307, but that only covered Gaul since he was not augustus yet. Maxentius issued an edit of toleration shortly after that. Then, a few years later, right before his death in 311, Galerius issued an empire-wide edict of toleration--his was the first. Maximinus Daia in the east continued to persecute Christians, but shortly before his final defeat at the hands of Licinius in 313, he too issued an edit of toleration. Then, finally, later that year comes the edit of Milan, which was actually promulgated by Licinius and not Constantine, based on discussions between the two from a year earlier. So it was, in effect, a joint issue. What was revolutionary about this edict was not that Christians were to be tolerated or any property returned, but that it declares that the emperors and empire are under the the protection of the "highest god".

Vale,

Gualterus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75889 From: marcushoratius Date: 2010-05-23
Subject: a. d. X Kalendas Iunonias: TUBILUSTRUM; Volcanus and Maia
M. Moravius Piscinus Horatianus Quiritibus cultoribus Deorum et omnibus salutem plurimam dicit: Deus Volcanus vos porrigat.

Hodie est ante diem X Kalendas Iunonias; haec dies nefastus piaculum est: TUBILUSTRIUM; feriae Volcano; dies Rosarium


Tubilustrium

As on 23 March, the Tubilustrium of 23 May was a purification of the tubae by which the Comitia Curiata was called to assemble in the comitia calata on the following day. This Comitia witnessed the proclamation of wills, and some forms of adoptions. The following day in March is marked Q. R. C. F. That is, Quando Rex comitiavit fas, Other comitia could not meet as tribunals until the Rex would dismiss the Comitia Curiata.

Festival of Volcanus and Maia

"Holy Vulcanus, foremost of those who cherish this place, to You we pray for peace. Grant Your ultimate assistance to the tired and worn, and, if no one here merits punishment for some noxious crime, may You have mercy on all their souls and allow them to reach Your purifying fountains. Three times they invoke Your name, three times they pour rich incense upon the focal fire, and strewn the altar with auspicious boughs in Your honour." ~ Grattius Faliscus, Cynegetica 437-442

"Soon, I pray, Vulcan, memories of whispered rumors of disgrace and loud quarrels of complaint You will no longer hold against the children of Mars; we are also the children of Your sweet wife Venus, spare us, Father." ~ Marcus Valerius Martialis, Epigrammata 5.7.5

"Why did Romulus build a temple of Volcanus outside the City? Was it in consequence of Volcanus' fabled jealousy of Mars because of Venus that Romulus, the reputed son of Mars, did not give Volcanus a share in his home or City? Or is this a foolish explanation, and was the temple originally built as a secret place of assembly and council chamber for himself and his colleague Tatius,that here they might convene with senators and take counsel concerning public affairs in quiet without being disturbed? Or was it that since Rome, from the very beginning, has been in great danger from conflagrations, they decided to show honor to this God, but to place His temple outside the City?" ~ Plutarch, Roman Questions 47

In Greek myth Hephaestus was married to Aphrodite. Maia was a nymph identified with the largest star among the Pleiades as the rising of that group of stars in spring signified rain. And Maia was said to be the mother of Hernes by Zeus. Among the Romans Maia is instead associated with Volcanus. She is an Earth Goddess related to the Bona Dea. On 1 May sacrifices were offered to Maia, and to the Bona Dea by the flamen Volcanalis. Originally Volcanus was probably a Latin version of Italic Vertumnus, who was later reintroduced. Volcanus was thus the God of inner warmth that 'ripened' the Earth Mother in spring in the same way that we'll later see Vertumnus 'ripen' Flora. As Cicero said, there are numerous deities but only a few names found in the Libri Pontifici for them all. The layers upon layers of Roman polytheism, although confusing at times, also explains some of these divers entries about the Gods.


AUC 690 / 63 BCE: Pompeius Magnus takes Jerusalem

Upon the death of the Hasmonean nasi Yohanan Hyrcanus in 104 BCE, his son Judah Aristobulus seized the throne, threw his mother into prison where she was left to starve, and threw his three brothers in prison as well. Within in a year Aristobulus had died a painful death. His wife Salome then released the brothers and married the eldest, Alexander Yannai. In foreign affairs Yohannan Hyrcanus and his sons Judah Aristobulus and Alexander had each in turn managed to expand Judea at the expense of the Seleucids of Syria. Internally Judea was divided among Pharisees who supported Judah Aristobulus and Sadducees who supported Alexander Yannai. During Sukkot, the Feast of Tabernacles, Alexander ordered his army to slaughter 6,000 in the courtyard of the Temple of Jerusalem. This led to a civil war, intervention by Demetrius III of Syria, a devastating war with Ptolemy of Egypt, and war with the Nabateans. By 76 BCE Alexander Yannai was dead, along with at least 50,000 Jews who died during the civil war. Rule of Judea then reverted back to Queen Salome, Shlomtzion, who then brokered a peace with both the Sadducees and the Pharisees. She established the Sadducees in fortified cities outside Jerusalem, while inside the city she elevated the Pharisees and placed them in control of the Sanhedrin. To replace Alexander Yannai as high priest, Salome named her eldest son Hyrcanus II.Upon the death of Salome in 67 BCE Hyrcanus also became king. But three months later, with the help of the Sadducees, his younger brother Aristobulus II overthrew Hyrcanus II. Hyrcanus and the Pharisees joined in an alliance with the Nabateans and began a seige of Jerusalem.

Meanwhile, to the north, Pompeius Magnus had taken Pontus and Armenia and had sent M. Aemilius Scaurus against Seleucid Syria. The Hasmonean kings were allies of Rome against the Seleucids, so both sides of the Judean civil war courted Aemilius. Aemilius favored Aristobulus II and ordered the Nabatean army to end its seige of Jerusalem. When Pompeius arrived in 63 BCE he favored the weaker Hyrcanus II as more promising to Rome's ambitions in the region. Pompeius thus ordered Aristobulus II to surrender Jerusalem, which he agreed to do. However the Sadducees supporters of Aristobulus who were in Jerusalem itself refused to open the gates. Pompeius then stormed the city and entered the temple. AristobulusII was sent off to Rome a prisoner. Hyrcanus II was reinstalled as high priest, but not as king. Antipater of Idumea was instead placed in political control of Judea, acting on behalf of Rome.

This did not end affairs in Judea. With the aid of the Parthians, the son of Aristobulus II, Antigonus proclaimed himself king and high priest in 40 BCE. Antigonus captured Hyrcanus II, bit off his ears, deforming him so that he could no longer be a priest, and sent Hyrcanus in exile to Babylonia. Herod brought Hyrcanus back four years later, showing him respect and installing him as president of the state council. But then in 30 BCE Herod accused Hyrcanus II of plotting with the Nabateans and had him executed. (See Flavius Josephus, 'Antiquities' and 'The Jewish War.')


Dies Rosarium

On this day wreathes of roses were laid as offerings on the tombs and monuments of the Manes that, like the Temple of Volcanus, lay outside the City of Rome.


Our thought for today is from Sextus, 10:

"God, indeed, is not in want of anything, but the wise man is in want of God alone. He, therefore, who is in want but of few things, and those necessary, emulates Him who is in want of nothing."
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75890 From: marcushoratius Date: 2010-05-24
Subject: a. d. IX Kalendas Iunonias: Q. R. C. F.
M. Moravius Piscinus Horatianus Quiritibus cultoribus Deorum et omnibus salutem plurimam dicit: Di vos salvas et servatas volunt. .

Hodie est ante diem IX Kalendas Iunonias; haec dies comitialis est: Q. R. C. F; supplicatio Vestae; feriae ex senatus consulto quod eo die Caesar triumphans in urbem invictus est.

Quando Rex Comitiavit Fas: "When it is proper and right for the Rex (Sacrorum) to convoke the Comitia (Curiata)."

This was the day, as in March, when the Rex, and later the Rex Sacrorum, was permitted to call the comitia curiata that it might hear the proclamation of wills and certain types of adoptions. While we might think of this as an exception to the Republican prosciption on the Rex Sacrorum from holding any political office, the one remaining role of the comitia curiata had a religious significance. Roman wills, and often time adoptions as well, were more concerned with the transfer of the family cultus and its shrines than with the transference of property. Today is about maintaining the ius Manibus and the family cultus to the Lares. Although today is dies comitialis, no other comitia may assemble until the Rex Sacrorum dismisses the Curiata from the Comitia Calata. A supplicatio for Vesta is also noted for today.

"Vesta, favor me. To You now our voices lift in praise as by this rite it is allowed that we may approach You." ~ P. Ovid Naso, Fasti 6.249-50


AUC 541 / 212 BCE: Superstition engulfs the City as the war with Hannibal drags on

"The longer the war continued, and the more men's minds as well as their fortunes were affected by the alternations of success and failure, so much the more did the citizens become the victims of superstitions, and those for the most part foreign ones. It seemed as though either the characters of men or the nature of the Gods had undergone a sudden change. The Roman ritual was growing into disuse not only in secret and in private houses; even in public places, in the Forum and the Capitol, crowds of women were to be seen who were offering neither sacrifices nor prayers in accordance with ancient usage. Unauthorised sacrificers and diviners had got possession of men's minds and the numbers of their dupes were swelled by the crowds of country people whom poverty or fear had driven into the City, and whose fields had lain untilled owing to the length of the war or had been desolated by the enemy. These impostors found their profit in trading upon the ignorance of others, and they practiced their calling with as much effrontery as if they had been duly authorised by the State. Respectable citizens protested in private against the state of things, and ultimately the matter became a public scandal and formal complaint was made to the senate. The aediles and commissioners of police were severely reprimanded by the senate for not preventing these abuses, but when they attempted to remove the crowds from the Forum and destroy the altars and other preparations for their rites they narrowly escaped being roughly handled. As the mischief appeared to be too much for the inferior magistrates to deal with, M. Aemilius, the praetor urbanus, was entrusted with the task of delivering the people from these superstitions. He read the resolution of the senate before the Assembly and gave notice that all those who had in their possession any manuals of divination or forms of prayers or sacrificial ritual in writing were to bring all their books and writings to him before the first of April, and no one was to use any strange or foreign form of sacrifice in any public or consecrated place." ~ Titus Livius 25.1.6 ff


AUC 738 / 15 BCE: Birth of Germanicus Caesar.

The popular heir apparent and grandson of Augustus, Germanicus died under what was regarded as suspicious circumstances. He was later recognized as a divus, and thus appears on the military calendar of Dura Europus (227 CE). A supplication is noted as held in his memory.


AUC 719 / 34 BCE: Anthony as Pater Liber

"Then as his love for Cleopatra became more ardent and his vices grew upon him — for these are always nourished by power and license and flattery — he resolved to make war upon his country. He had previously given orders that he should be called the new Father Liber, and indeed in a procession at Alexandria he had impersonated Father Liber, his head bound with the ivy wreath, his person enveloped in the saffron robe of gold, holding in his hand the thyrsus, wearing the buskins, and riding in the Bacchic chariot." ~ Velleius Paterculus, Historia 82.4

"Why do they call Bacchus Pater Liber? Is it because He is the Father of Freedom to drinkers? For most people become bold and are abounding in frank speech when they are in their cups. Or is it because He has provided the means for libations? Or is it derived, as Alexander asserts, from Dionysus Eleutherens, so named from Eleutherae in Boeotia?" ~ Plutarch, Roman Questions 104


Our thought for today is from Democritus, Golden Sentences 16.

"He who is perfectly vanquished by riches, can never be just."
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75891 From: marcushoratius Date: 2010-05-26
Subject: a. d. VIII Kalendas Iunonias: Fortuna Primigenia; Fors Fortuna; Fort
M. Moravius Piscinus Horatianus Quiritibus cultoribus Deorum et omnibus salutem plurimam dicit:: Bonam habete Fortunam.

Hodie est ante diem VIII Kalendas Iunonias; haec dies comitialis est: Fortunae Publicae populi Romani Quiritium in colle Quirinali; Fortunae Primigeniae in colle Quirinali; Capra mane exoritur, septentrionales venti.

AUC 6 / 567 BCE: Servius Tullius, Rex, triumphed for a second time over the Etruscans, a. d. 8 kal. Jun. (25th May) ~ Fasti Triumphales

Today celebrates the dedication of at least two of three temples of a Fortuna in close proximity on the Quirinal Hill, known as the place of the 'tres Fortunae.' On 24 June we will again come upon tres Fortunae, the same three, only with temples placed on the far side of the Tiber River around the Gardens of Caesar. On the Quirinal the oldest would seem to have been Fors Fortuna. Then in 194 BCE a temple was dedicated to Fortuna Primigenia and a later temple was dedicated to Fortuna Publica.

First of our Fortunae, then is Fors Fortuna. It was once argued that Her name derived from 'ferre' and thus that She was "the Goddess who brings forth good fortune." Max Muller argued instead for a different etymology derived from Sanskrit, where he posed Her as "the bright light of each day," being comparable then to Fortuna huisce diei. He further noted in support of his argument how, on 11 June, a Temple of Fortuna was dedicated in the Forum Boarium in conjunction with the Matralia. This Temple of Fortuna was said to contain a statue of Servius Tullius, or that of Fortuna draped with the toga praetexta of Servius Tullius. Several of Rome's temples of Fortuna were attributed to this king, and his own story of Fortuna raising him from humble origin to become king connected the early Fors Fortuna with the destiny of children (Pliny, N. H. 8.194, 197; Varro in Nonnius p. 189). "She who brings forth" and also "the bright light of each day" can both refer to the fortune brought by children, or to the good fortune Roman women needed during childbirth. Etymological arguments are the weakest to make in trying to explain a God or Goddess, but we might accept that Fors Fortuna did relate in some way with children and birthing. While temples to other Fortunae came to be built near Her own, across from the tres Fortunae on the Quirinal was where there were temples to Juno Lucina and Salus, as well as the sacred grove of Mefitis, each being a cultus of women concerned in one way or another with caring for children.

AUC / 194 BCE: Dedication of Temples following the Second Punic War

"A number of temples were dedicated this year. One was the temple of Juno Matuta in the Forum Olitorium. This had been vowed four years previously and its building contracted for by C. Cornelius during his consulship, and he dedicated it when he was censor. Another was the temple of Faunus; the aediles C. Scribonius and Cn. Domitius had contracted for its building two years before out of the money raised by fines, and Cn. Domitius dedicated it when he was City praetor. Q. Marcius Rulla dedicated a temple to Fortuna Primigenia on the Quirinal, having been made duumvir for the purpose. P. Sempronius Sophus had vowed it in the Punic War ten years previously, when he was consul, and he had made the contract for it during his censorship. C. Servilius also dedicated a temple to Jupiter on the Island, which had been vowed six years before in a war with the Gauls by the praetor L. Furius Purpurio, who when consul signed the contract for its construction." ~ Titus Livius 34.53

The second temple dedicated to Fortuna on the Quirinal was thus that of Fortuna Primigenia. Her cultus was brought to Rome from Praeneste, where Her oracle was the most renown in Italy. The oracle there was opened each year on 11 April (Fasti Praeneste). Inscribed lots were placed within a vessel of water, the lots allowed then to float to the top. A lot would then be selected by a young boy whose hand was guided by Fortuna (Cicero, De Divinatione 2.86: quae[sortes] Fortunae monitu pueri manu miscentur atque ducuntur). The practice of using boys to draw lots would seem to have been widespread. Images of boys handing lots to men come from Praeneste, Ostia, and Rome. It is mentioned by Horace, Petronius Arbiter in the 'Satyricon,' and by A. Tibullus:

"From the boy's hand thrice did she lift the sacred lots, and from all three did the boy announce to her that the omens were sure (1.3.11-12)."

At Rome itself it would seem that Fortuna Primigenia took on another role and may have been confused by Plutarch with Fors Fortuna.

"Why do the Romans revere Fortuna Primigenia, or 'First Born,' as one might translate it? Is it because by Fortune, as they say, it befell Servius, born of a maidservant, to become a famous king of Rome? This is the assumption which the majority of Romans make. Or is it rather because Fortuna supplied the origin and birth of Rome? Or does the matter have an explanation more natural and philosophic, which assumes that Fortuna is the origin of everything, and Nature acquires its solid frame by the operation of Fortuna, whenever order is created in any store of matter gathered together at haphazard?" ~ Plutarch, Roman Questions 106


It shall also be instructive to look at comments by Pliny the Elder on Fortuna. Following philosophers, he poses popular beliefs as superstitious, but at the same time tells us something on how people thought about Fortuna in general.

"For all over the world, in all places, and at all times, Fortuna is the only one among the Gods whom every one invokes; She alone is spoken of, She alone is accused and assumed guilty; She alone is in our thoughts, is praised and blamed, and is loaded with reproaches; wavering as She is, conceived by the generality of mankind to be blind, wandering, inconstant, uncertain, variable, and often favoring the unworthy. To Her are referred all our losses and all our gains, and in casting up the accounts of mortals She alone balances the two pages of our sheet. We are so much in the power of chance, that change itself is considered as a God, and the existence of God becomes doubtful." ~ Plinius Secundus, Historia Naturalis 2.5 (22)

"As to examples of the vicissitudes of Fortune, they are innumerable. For what great pleasures has she ever given us, which have not taken their rise in misfortunes? And what extraordinary misfortunes have not taken their first rise in great pleasures? It was fortune that preserved the Senator, M. Fidustius,1 who had been proscribed by Sylla, for a period of thirty-six years. And yet he was proscribed a second time; for he survived Sylla, even to the days of Antony, and, as it appears, was proscribed by him, for no other reason but because he had been proscribed before." ~ Plinius Secundus, Historia Naturalis 7.43 (134)

Fortune and misfortune intertwined into every life. The reversal of fortune is a theme one often encounters among Roman authors. Livy will allude to it. Valerius Maximus devotes sections to examples of men and women whose fortunes drastically changed over time. Ovid's own life is an example of Fortuna's fickleness. One could begin with Romulus and Remus, exposed at birth only to found the greatest City. Numa, Hostilius, Tarquinius, Servius Tullius, all of the kings in fact might be posed as legends with a moral on the transitory nature of fortune. Here is only part of Pliny offers in continuing his discussion of Fortuna.

"Fortune has determined that P. Ventidius alone should enjoy the honor of a triumph over the Parthians, and yet the same individual, when he was a child, She led in the triumphal procession of Cneius Pompeius, the conqueror of Asculum. Indeed, Masurius says, that he had been twice led in triumph; and according to Cicero, he used to let out mules for the bakers of the camp. Most writers, indeed, admit that his younger days were passed in the greatest poverty, and that he wore the hob-nailed shoes of the common soldier. Balbus Cornelius, also, the elder, was elected to the consulate; but he had previously been accused, and the judges had been charged to discuss the point whether he could or not lawfully be scourged with rods; he being the first foreigner, born even on the very shores of the ocean, who obtained that honor, which our ancestors denied even to the people of Latium. Among other remarkable instances, also, we have that of L. Fulvius, the consul of the rebellious Tusculani, who, immediately upon his coming over to the Romans, obtained from them the same honor. He is the only individual who, in the same year in which he had been its enemy, enjoyed the honor of a triumph in Rome, and that too, over the people whose consul he had previously been. Down to the present time, L. Sylla is the only man who has claimed to himself the surname of 'Felix;' a name which he derived, forsooth, from the bloodshed of the citizens and the oppression of his country! But what claim had he on which to found his title to this happiness? Was it the power which he had of proscribing and massacring so many thousands of his fellow-citizens? Oh interpretation most disgraceful, and which must stamp him as 'Infelix' to all future time! Were not the men who perished in those times, of the two, to be looked upon as the more fortunate--seeing that with them we sympathize, while there is no one who does not detest Sylla? And then, besides, was not the close of his life more horrible than the sufferings which had been experienced by any of those who had been proscribed by him? His very flesh eating into itself, and so engendering his own punishment. And this, although he may have thought proper to gloss over by his last dream, in the very midst of which he may be said, in some measure, to have died; and in which, as he pretended, he was told that his glory alone had risen superior to all envy; though at the same time, he confessed that it was still wanting to his supreme happiness, that he had not dedicated the Capitol." ~ Plinius Secundus, Historia Naturalis 7.44

Pliny goes on to discuss the fortunes of Augustus, and unlikely person to rise in such an era of turmoil to such an exalted position, and one, who having done so, seemed plagued with personal misfortunes even as he provided Rome with a sustained era of peace and prosperity. The fortunes of the Empire itself were to become identified with that of the emperor. Prayer and sacrifice was offered annually for the health and well-being of the emperor as a way to secure the favor of the Gods for the Empire and its citizens. But this idea had its roots in the Republic. The fortune of Rome was often identified with the fortunes and misfortunes of its leaders. Consuls were elected more often because they were thought to be lucky than that they had proven any skill. It might that they bore the name of a famous ancestor, and thus was thought to possess something of that ancestor in themselves. Or there might have been some incident to indicate that a candidate was favored by the Gods, as in the case of Fabius Corvus, elected as consul when so young and returned to office again because he proved to be fortunate in battle. Likewise with Marius, champion of the people, returned as consul more often than any other, because with each success he demonstrated that the Gods favored him.

Thus we come to the third Fortuna, Fortuna Publica whose temple was dedicated in 52 BCE. That fateful year saw Caesar away, unable at first to put down the rebellion of Vercigetorix and finding himself surrounded at Alesia. But at Rome, unrest in the street between Milo and Clodius was brought to an end by the Senate appointing Pompeius Magnus as sole consul; in effect a dictator. Clodius was already dead by then and Milo was tried under Pompeius. Pompeius married the widow of Crassus and elevated his father-in-law as his colleague. Thus the greatest general of the time wed wealth and resolved his rivalry with the Senate just as it seemed that Fortuna would deal with Caesar Herself. Or was it instead the work of Fortuna concentrating all of Caesar's enemies into one camp just as She provided him with his greatest victory and the opportunity that would see him rise to a height no other had attained? And with Caesar also rose the fortune of Rome itself. Rome was fortunate to have borne its Marcellus, its Scipioes, Fabii, Aemilius and so many other great men; the Viri Summi that Augustus was to set up in his forum. This is wherein we may understand Fortuna Publica, but She relates back to Fors Fortuna, too, as we all place our hopes in Bona Fortuna that She may bless our children as much as we hope that Fortuna Publica shall bless the leaders among the children of our nation.

"Go, Quirites, celebrate with joy the Goddess of Good Fortune." ~ Ovid Fasti 6.775


Our thought for today is from Epicurus, Vatican Sayings 53:

"We must envy no one; for the good do not deserve envy and as for the bad, the more they prosper, the more they ruin it for themselves."
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75892 From: marcushoratius Date: 2010-05-26
Subject: a. d. VII Kalendas Iunonias: Dea Dia; Sacred Grove of the Fratres Ar
M. Moravius Piscinus Horatianus Quiritibus cultoribus Deorum et omnibus salutem plurimam dicit: Sapite animo; fruamini anima.

Hodie est ante diem VII Kalendas Iunonias; haec dies comitialis est.

AUC 770 / 17 CE: Triumph of Germanicus for his victories in Germany

"By a forced march, however, the Roman columns cut through the Caesian Forest and the line of delimitation commenced by Tiberius. By this line they pitched the camp, with their front and rear protected by embankments and the flanks by a barricade of felled trees. Then came a threading of gloomy forests and a consultation which of two roads to follow; the one short and usual, the other more difficult and unexplored, and therefore left unguarded by the enemy. The longer route was chosen, but otherwise all speed was made: for scouts had brought in news that the night was a German festival and would be celebrated with games and a solemn banquet. Caecina was ordered to move ahead with the unencumbered cohorts and clear a passage through the woods: the legions followed at a moderate interval. The clear, starry night was in our favour; the Marsian villages were reached, and a ring of pickets was posted round the enemy, who were still lying, some in because, others beside their tables, without misgivings and with no sentries advanced. All was disorder and improvidence: there was no apprehension of war, and even their peace was the nerveless lethargy of drunkards.

"To extend the scope of the raid, the Caesar divided his eager legions into four bodies, and, for fifty miles around, wasted the country with sword and flame. Neither age nor sex inspired pity: places sacred and profane were razed indifferently to the ground; among them, the most noted religious centre of these tribes, known as the temple of Tanfana. The troops escaped without a wound: they had been cutting down men half-asleep, unarmed or dispersed.

"The carnage brought the Bructeri, Tubantes, and Usipetes into the field; and they occupied the forest passes by which the army was bound to return. This came to the prince's ear, and he took the road prepared either to march or to fight. A detachment of cavalry and ten auxiliary cohorts led the way, then came the first legion; the baggage-train was in the centre; the twenty-first legion guarded the left flank; the fifth, the right; the twentieth held the rear, and the rest of the allies followed. The enemy, however, made no move, till the whole line was defiling through the wood: then instituting a half-serious attack on the front and flanks, they threw their full force on the rear. The light-armed cohorts were falling into disorder before the serried German masses, when the Caesar rode up to the men of the twenty-first, and, raising his voice, kept crying that now was their time to efface the stain of mutiny:— "Forward, and make speed to turn disgrace into glory!" In a flame of enthusiasm, they broke through their enemies at one charge, drove them into the open and cut them down. Simultaneously the forces in the van emerged from the forest and fortified a camp. From this point the march was unmolested, and the soldiers, emboldened by their late performances, and forgetful of the past, were stationed in winter quarters." ~ P. Cornelius Tacitus, Annales 1.50-51


AUC 860 / 107 CE: Trajan celebrates a triumph for his victories over the Dacians


Return of Those Reported Dead

"Why is it that those who are falsely reported to have died in a foreign country, even if they return, men do not admit by the door, but mount upon the roof tiles and let them down inside? Varro gives an explanation of the cause that is quite fabulous. For he says that in the Sicilian War there was a great naval battle, and in the case of many men a false report spread that they were dead. But, when they had returned home, in a short time they all came to their end except one who, when he tried to enter, found the doors shutting against him of their own accord, nor did they yield when he strove to open them. The man fell asleep there before his threshold and in his sleep saw a vision that instructed him to climb upon the roof and let himself down into the house. When he had done so, he prospered and lived to an advanced age; and from this occurrence the custom became established for succeeding generations." ~ Plutarch, Roman Questions 5


The Dea Dia

Nothing is known about the Dea Dia other than Her title from the Acta Fratrum Arvalum. Formerly, modern historians speculated that She might be none other than Ceres. However, no other deities associated with Ceres appear in the Acta. None of Ceres' indigitamenta appear in the record either. The sacrifices offered to the Dea Dia are not characteristic of those offered to Ceres. And the rites recorded in the Acta for the Dea Dia are unlike rites performed for Ceres. Instead there is an association of the Dea Dia with Mater Larum, where the latter appears in the Acta, that is consistent with a cultus intended to preserve the health of the emperor. Her title, Dea Dia, perhaps suggests the very ancient Goddess Iana, or Diana as She was sometimes called, consort of Ianus Matutus. Iana Matutus can likewise be associated with Mater Larum. The problem here, though, is that Mater Larum does not appear in the Acta Fratrum Arvalum until 183 CE, and then only three other times – in 218, 224, and 240 – does Her name again appear. No God or Goddess consistently appears in the record, not even the Dea Dia Herself, so we cannot really gain an idea of who the Dea Dia may have been or with what function She may have been associated.

AUC 840 / 87 CE: The Grove Rites of the Fratres Arvales

"In the consulship of C. Bellicus Natalis Tebanianus and C. Ducenius Proclus XIV KAL JUN in the grove of the Dea Dia, when C. Julius Silanus was magister, with C. Nonius Bassus Salvius Liberalis taking charge, the Fratres Arvales performed sacrifices to Dea Dia. C. Salvius Liberalis, who was acting in place of the magister, C. Julius Silanus, in front of the grove sacrificed onto the altar two expiatory pigs in expiation for polluting the grove and the work to be carried out there. Then he sacrificed a cow as an offering to Dea Dia... [The five attending Arvales] sat down in the tetrastylum and feasted off the sacrifice, and taking up their togae praetextae and their wreaths made of ears of corn with woolen bands, they ascended the grove of Dea Dia with attendants clearing the way and through Salvius Liberalis Nonius Bassus, who was acting in place of the flamen, they sacrificed a choice lamb to Dea Dia and, when the sacrifice was complete, they all made a libation with incense and wine. Then, when the wreaths had been brought in [returning into the temple] and the statues perfumed, they made Q. Tillius Sassius annual magister from the coming Saturnalia to the next, likewise they made T. Julius Celsus Marius Candidus flamen. Then they went down to the tetrastylum, and there reclining in the triclinium they feasted in the presence of the magister, C. Julius Silanus. After the feast wearing a veil and sandals, with a wreath woven with roses, with an attendant clearing the way, he ascended above the starting gates [of the circus] and gave the signal to the four-horse chariots and the leapers, with L. Maecius Postumus presiding, he honored the victors with palms and silver wreaths. On the same day at Rome, in the house of the magister C. Julius Silanus, the same people who were in the grove dined." ~ CIL vi.2065, col. 2, lines 15-40; ILS 5037

From other inscriptions in the Acta we gain additional details of the grove rites. The rites were never quite the same from year to year as additional deities were invoked or else passed from the rites. The entrails of sows offered to the geni loci of the grove were burnt on an outdoor altar, and that of a cow's offered to Dea Dia on a silver brazier. The magister would wear a toga praetexta to make the initial sacrifices. Then he would bathe before donning white robes to receive his fellow Arvales for a sacred meal of bread and the meat of the sows. After the sacrifice of a white female lamb, the Arvales were led in procession back to the temple where each sacrificed pieces of liver coated with milk and flour three times before the Goddess. The Fratres Arvales then returned to the outdoor altar to repeat the sacrifice and offer prayers. It was at this point in some years that the indigementa were invoked as well. In certain years the Fratres would then return inside the temple to offer prayer to sacred urns (ollae). The urns were carried outside where their contents were tossed on the ground in an offering to Mater Larum. The temple doors were then closed, loaves of bread wrapped in laurel were given to slaves, who were then dismissed, and the Arvales then proceeded back to the altar. Standing before the outdoor altar, the magister sent two Arvales in "search of the cereals." Returning with these, a sacrifice was then made of incense, sweet wine, milk, and sweet cakes.

At this point, only in the year 218 C. E., acolytes handed out hymnals and they too were then dismissed. The Carmen Fratrum Arvalium was chanted in ternary rhythm as the Arvales danced in procession (a tripudatio) back into the temple for further rites to the Dea Dia. The Carmen is never recorded as being used in any other year. That year, too, was one in which Mater Larum was named in the Acta, but She appears only three other times. The Acta is not consistent from year to year, as deities enter and leave the record frequently. Even the Dea Dia does not consistently appear in the Acta Fratrum Arvalum. And thus it is difficult, if not impossible now, to have any idea on the Dea Dia.

In the inscription above for the year 840 AUC we see the Fratres electing their magister and flamen for the following year. Then chariot races were held near the grove. These were not public chariot races. Domitianus, who was emperor at the time, is not mentioned eventhough he was a Frater Arvalis as all emperors were, begining with Augustus who founded the sodalitas in 29 BCE. He was therefore not one of the attending Fratres. Even the Magister Julius Silanus did not attend, as he prepared for the feast that was to follow in the evening at his home in the City. Who else may have attended such events would likely be senators and some imperial magistrates. It seems that these rites and their attending chariot races were reserved for the elite of the Empire away from the vulgar crowds of the City.


Today's thought is from Epictetus, Discourses 3.14.8:

"Two things must be rooted out of men: conceit and diffidence. Conceit lies in thinking that there is nothing more you can need; and diffidence in supposing it impossible that, under such adverse circumstances, you should ever live a happy life."
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75893 From: rory12001 Date: 2010-05-26
Subject: Announcers needed; new Vox Romana podcast!
M. Hortensia quiritibus spd;
a new podcast is in the works, and Vox Romana needs: announcers & reporters. Please contact me if you are interested! The podcast is a fun experience & the feedback is always appreciative.
listen here to our previous podcasts
http://www.insulaumbra.com/voxromana/

M. Hortensia Maior
producer, Vox Romana podcast
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75894 From: marcushoratius Date: 2010-05-27
Subject: a. d. VI Kalendas Iunonias: The Di Penates; Banquet of the Fratres A
M. Moravius Piscinus Horatianus Quiritibus cultoribus Deorum et omnibus salutem plurimam dicit: Di vos salvas et servatas volunt.

Hodie est ante diem VI Kalendas Iunonias; haec dies comitialis est: Di Penates

"Come, Dii Penates, come Apollo and Neptune and all You Gods, and by Your powers may You mercifully turn aside this ill disease that violently twists, scorches and burns our city with fever." ~ Arnobius, Adversus Nationes III 43

The Temple of the Di Penates on the Velia was restored this day by Augustus (Res Gestae Divi Augusti 19). The site of the temple had previously been the house of Tullus Hostilius (Varro ap. Non. 531). It is mentioned on the list of shrines of the Argei, the list supposedly dating to the third century (Varro Lingua Latinae 5.54). Livy mentions the temple in conjunction with prodigia in 167 BCE and again in 165 BCE. Dionysius of Halicarnassus said that within the temple were statues of the Dioscuri as the Di Penates, and on coins where images of the temple appear the Dioscuri are also indicated. However, decorative statues do not really tell us anything about the Penates or who they may have once been identified.

Some modern scholars came to think that Apollo and Neptunus were the Penates, based on Arnobius above, even though it would seem that he was quoting a prayer that distinguished those deities from the Di Penates. Originally the Di Penates were probably the same as the Di Manes or Di Maiores of the City. Caesius considered these to have been Ceres, Genius Iovialis, Pales, and Fortuna. Others regarded the Capitoline triun of Jupiter, Juno, and Minerva as the protective deities of Rome and thus the Di Penates of Rome. Still others thought that there were four sets of Di Penates. The first were the Di Penates of Jupiter, the second those of Neptunus, a third set of Di Penates were among mortals, where the fourth set of Di Penates belonged with Dis Pater in the Underworld. Varro mentions the Di Penates nostri as those carried to Lavinium by Aeneas (L. L. 5.144). Later they were to be carried to Alba Longa. However, the Di Penates did not agree to this. The story is told by Dionysius of Halicarnassus.

"While the city (Alba Longa) was building, a most remarkable prodigy is said to have occurred. A temple with an inner sanctuary had been built for the images of the Gods which Aeneas had brought with him from the Troad and set up in Lavinium, and the statues had been removed from Lavinium to this sanctuary; but during the following night, although the doors were most carefully closed and the walls of the enclosure and the roof of the temple suffered no injury, the statues changed their position and were found upon their old pedestals. And after being brought back again from Lavinium with supplications and propitiatory sacrifices they returned in like manner to the same place. Upon this the people were for someone time in doubt what they should do, being unwilling either to live apart from their ancestral Gods or to return again to their deserted habitation. But at last they hit upon an expedient which promised to meet satisfactorily both these difficulties. This was to let the images remain where they were and to conduct men back from Alba to Lavinium to live there and take care of them. Those who were sent to Lavinium to have charge of their rites were six hundred in number; they removed thither with their entire households, and Aegestus was appointed their chief. As for these Gods, the Romans call them Penates. Some who translate the name into the Greek language render it Patrôoi (Gods of the Race), others Genethlioi (Gods of the Family), some Ktêsiori Gods of the House and Property), others Mychioi (Gods of the Inner House), and still others Herkeioi (Gods of the Front Court). Each of these seems to be giving them their name from some one of their attributes, and it is probable that they are all expressing more or less the same idea. Concerning their figure and appearance, Timaeus, the historian, makes the statement that the holy objects preserved in the sanctuary at Lavinium are iron and bronze caducei or "heralds' wands," and a Trojan earthenware vessel; this, he says, he himself learned from the inhabitants. For my part, I believe that in the case of those things which it is not lawful for all to see I ought neither to hear about them from those who do see them nor to describe them; and I am indignant with every one else, too, who presumes to inquire into or to know more than what is permitted by law." ~ Dionysius of Halicarnassus 1.67

That the Di Penates would later accede to come to Rome would have been a matter of great pride to the Romans. The comment by Dionysius here is interesting, too. The sacred objects that represented the Di Penates brought from Troy are not statues of the Dioscuri. And if Dionysius thought it improper to speak of what is not lawful for all to see, then he indicates that the statues of the Dioscuri at the Temple of the Di Penates did not actually represent them. Varro mentions something else that might be related. In discussing the first Gods, Caelus and Terra, he relates Them to Great Gods (Dei Magni) of Samothracian mysteries. They were not, he says, to be identified with two statues of youths guarding the city gates who he identified as Castor and Pollux. He says that these Dei Magni are called the Divi potes in the Libri Augurum; that is, the "Powerful Gods," who would seem to better co-incide with the Di Penates from Troy than with Greek Dioscuri.


Banquet of the Fratres Arvales

In odd numbered years, the magister of the Fratres Arvales would hold a banquet in his home for the other fraters. The Emperor was always a member of this sodalitas, although not all emperors paid it attention. In fact the Fratres Arvales, an invention of Augustus, had everything to do with the emperor and at no time did it have anything to do with blessing fields. The Actum Fratrum Arvalum never mentions any ambarvalia or any lustratio that could be mistaken as connected with agriculture. Instead we find the Arvales performing two rites each year, on 3 January and in April, to benefit the health of the emperor and the imperial house. Other rites are found in their record, but these were the two that they conducted in each year. Today's banquet, with the emperor possibly attending as the honored guest, had the additional function of electing the new magister and flamen of the Fratres, who were to take office in the following year. It was customary to elect the most junior member of the sodalitas. That is, the newest member had to pay his dues by entertaining the emperor; not the easiest of tasks in some years.

Acceptance into a major priesthood was based on distinctions of social rank or exemplary service. This was not always true of the Fratres Arvales however. In its early years the members came from the aristocracy. Under Nero eight out of eleven Arvales were former consules and several came from ancient families. That changed after the Piso conspiracy. A survey of its later members does not show any who had come from families of the Republican nobilites, none of the families ennobled by Augustus, none that were enrolled as patricians by Claudius or Vespasian, none of the consular families that came from Spain or Narbonensis. Under Domitian and Trajan are found members who are friends, kinsmen, army commanders, dispensers of patronage, but not the elite. Missing are the close allies of Caesar, Licinius Sura and Julius Servianus, as well as other prominent individuals. From among the Arvales some would rise to a consulship, one would have a grandson become emperor. But unlike the other priesthoods, membership in the Arvales preceded attaining social or political rank, and not all attained high rank. Julius Quadratus, for example, held a biennium as legatus to the proconsul of Asia when M. Ulpius Trajanus was governor. It was not a position that would lead to praetor or consul, but when Trajan became emperor Quadratus was appointed governor of Syria. In appreciation he built at Pergamum a temple to Trajan and Juppiter Amicalis. Who the Arvales represent are young men of promise, the mid-level senatores, the boni viri and locupletes mainly of Italy, men who could not expect to rise to prominence, but who were needed to serve in various positions for the functioning of the empire. The emperor himself was always an Arvalis and the Fratres Arvales provided him with a group of midlevel functionaries whose only attribute was their loyalty to the emperor. First and foremost the Fratres Arvales was an imperial political fraternity. Its religious ceremonies expressed that political function, and thus we shall turn to those over the next couple of days. (See "Some Arval Brethren," Ronald Syme, Oxford, 1980, pp. 77-110.)


Our thought for today comes from Stobaeus 41:

"Travelling teaches a man frugality, and the way in which he may be sufficient to himself. For bread made of milk and flour, and a bed of grass, are the sweetest remedies of hunger and labor."
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75895 From: luciaiuliaaquila Date: 2010-05-27
Subject: Winning Entries Ludi Megalenses 2763 AUC April 2010
Iulia Aquila Amicae, Amici Omnibusque S.P.D.


I shall take advantage today of a moment of free time, and also of the peace and quiet in the forum, to post on the Main List the winners of the Ludi Megalenses 2763 AUC we enjoyed from April 4 to April 10 2010.
I apologize for the delay but besides the political climate in the forum and voting; those comprising the Ædilician Cohors became extremely busy for various legitimate reasons in their private lives and in their duties in Nova Roma. The results, along with the Opening and Closing Ceremonies, were published in a timely manner on the Nova Roma website: http://novaroma.org/nr/Ludi_Megalenses_2763_AUC

Many thanks go out to the Ædilician Cohors and to the Ædile Jury: P. Annæus Constantinus Placidus, Cn. Cornelius Lentulus, M. Cornelius Gualterus Graecus, L. Iulia Aquila, C. Maria Caeca and A. Tullia Scholastica!

Special Thanks go to Pontifex Ti. Iulius Sabinus for the beautiful closing ceremony, Sacrifice to the Magna Mater!

Ædile Curule P. Annæus Constantinus Placidus thanks all who participated and congratulates all the winners!

The Winners:

Certamen Historicum Winner: Gaius Cocceius Spinula
Gaius Equitius Cato and Gaius Tullius Valerianus Germanicus are ex aequo at second place.


Lustratio Romæ (Artwork Contest) Winner: Gaius Aquillius Rota
Marcus Minucius Audens in a close second place
Honorable Mention to Quinta Sergia Alba
The entries, with descriptions, are posted here for all to enjoy:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/l_j_a/sets/72157624024168571/


Adumbratio ComÂœdia (Theatrical Comedy Sketch Writing Contest) Winner: Gaius Petronius Dexter
Marcus Minucius Audens is in a very close second place
These winning entries will be posted in a separate thread.

Valete et habete fortunam bonam!

L. Iulia Aquila
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75896 From: luciaiuliaaquila Date: 2010-05-27
Subject: Winning Entry: Gaius Petronius Dexter - Theatrical Comedy Sketch
Gods' advice : Shall Nova Roma become a club or a nation ?



Warning : the author introduces Gods and Goddesses as Plautus or
Aristophanes did in their comic plays, he does not want to hurt anybody
on his beliefs, please, only imagine Gods and Goddesses participating to
the Megalesia, playing and smiling but never badly mocked. Moreover,
they gently are making fun certain individuals of Nova Roma, as you
shall can guess.



----------------------------------



Mercury, the messenger of the Gods convenes all the Olympians to order
with this agenda.



Mercury :

- Considering that :

- I have informed the Gods of my intent convening on the
Capitoline Hill on Apr. 6 (msg Gods_List # 3273012 and
Superi_Romani_List # 9875916579);

- I have taken, in conformity of decretum "Collegii
pontificum et augurum de iure auspicandi et tripudio" (a.d. IV Non. Dec.
2756 auc), the auspicia relative to the session of the Olympian Gods of
the present convening;

- the auspices taken at dawn a.d. VIII Id. Apr. 2763 auc,
have been favorable and that the Collegium Augurum duly informed of
their taking and result;

Quod bonum felixque sit populo romano quiritibus, and after due
consultation of my little bird, I edict the following and referio ad
vos, Di inmortales:

- Art. 1 : The Gods are hereby convened for a session. Their
advice and/or decision are asked, in the frame of this session, on the
agenda presented in the following relatio :

- Art. following the previous one : According the
informations received from the censors, the Gods are the following ones,
designed by the abbreviation of their names, who are therefore convened
to the present session. Their list is thus reputed to be the Album
Deorum on Kal. Ian. 2763 auc and at the present date:



J

Jupiter

J

Juno

N

Neptune

C

Ceres

V

Vesta

M

Minerva

M

Mars

V

Venus

V

Vulcan

A

Apollo

D

Diana

M

Mercury

(Gods are ordered according to the random and, in a same category,
their seniority in the Mount Olympus; the Gods having resigned and
reintegrated are placed at the end of their category).

- Art. following: The Gods will be asked to issue a vote on
certain items, not on other ones which are proposed to the Capitoline
Hill either for their information, or for discussion so that a further
decision may be taken in the best environment as possible. The relatio
will specify the type of each of its items (information, discussion,
discussion +vote) ;

-1.2. Session

Beginning: Before tea time.

-1.1. Contio

Beginning: After tea time.

-1.3. Vote

Beginning: After the contio.

- Art. 2a . 89 : The agenda of the present session is the
following one:



Item I and… unic – Will Nova Roma become a club or a
nation ?

(discussion +vote).



*J* - As father of the Gods I speak firstÂ…

*D* - The reign of the fathers, Jove, are overÂ… now time is Youngs'
! So let me speak first.

*J* - I agree, darling daughter, but please do not call me "Jove". Call
me simply JupiterÂ…

*D* - Hem! When I was hunting, with my dogs around me, I saw an
omenÂ…

*V* - What kind of men did you see, Diana ?

*D* - Dear Vulcan, I beg your pardon, but it is not divine to interrupt
a goddess. Let me tell you the omen I sawÂ…

*J* - Yes, as father of the gods, I want to hear your omen about Nova
Roma, dear Diana. I am sure that it was crushing, dear princessÂ…

*D* - Yes, indeed! Under a bridgeÂ…

*V* - I guess it was at Paris.

*D* - Not at allÂ… this time Paris was not the problem.

*M* - This dope, indeed, preferred the Venus' beauty to my wisdomÂ…
and you dare to say that he is not a problem?

*V* - Shut up, Minerva! Paris was right in his judgement. I am the more
beautiful of all the goddesses.

*D* - But, sisters, please, be quiet! I have to tell you my omen about
Nova RomaÂ…

*A* - Yeap! Lovely Diana, my blood sister, explain us your omenÂ… you
know that I am the God of the divination and you can trust in me. I
might read the secret meaningsÂ…

*M* - I trust in a god! As obviously Dollars say.

*V* - Dollars? Oh Mercury, tell me, are they a new concept?

*M* - Yes, Vesta, indeed! Green concept by which we measure our brain.

*V* - I knew the John Lennon lyrics "a concept by which we measure our
pain" not yours.

*M* - Obviously, I just found it.

*D* - Can I obtain a complete silence, please? I want to share with all
of you the omen I saw about Nova Roma! Do not forget that we have to
vote about our item: "Shall Nova Roma become a club or a nation?".

*A* - Shall or will?

*D* - Oh nooo! You remind me an old and nasty discussionÂ…

*J* - Not a nasty discussion, but a verbiage. Now, darling daughter,
tell us the omen that you saw under a bridge, please.

*D* - Ok, dad. This morning, when I was hunting with my dogs around me I
came to a bridge. Obviously the bridge is a path, a crossing sign, as
everybody knows. And I saw a little bird passing under the arch of the
bridge, brushing against water.

*A* - By the club of Hercule! I understand the omen! It is a great and
favorable sign!

*C* - What does it mean, Apollo?

*A* - Ceres! My dear Ceres! It means Nova Roma shall be a nation.

*D* - Really? How do you explain that by this omen?

*A* - Because the little bird said to me. Nova Romans shall cross the
bridge when they come to it. Crossing a bridge, obviously, is a sign of
nation birth.



End.



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75897 From: luciaiuliaaquila Date: 2010-05-27
Subject: Second Place Entry: Marcus Minucius Audens Theatrical Comedy Sketch
Hardship
Two characters --

--Off-stage announcer -- is not seen by the audience, and

must have a loud clear voice;

--Marcus Minucius Audens -- dressed in ragged clothes

and who appears as hungary, tired, and overworked .

Five scenes as described in the body of the play.

===============================

The opening scene is Marcus plowing a field behind an old

cow using a very primitive plow.

The off-stage announcer -- Marcus Minucius Audens

has plowed his small field behind his old bull, and he

was exhausted, since he had been at this task since

before daylight and now the sun was going down but

that was all right since he was used to hardships!

Marcus -- slumps against the plow, dirty and exhausted,

and wipes his face with a red rag.

The second scene shows Marcus striding down the hill

toward the town on the sea.

Off-Stage Announcer -- Marcus is determined to find a

task that is more rewarding, and he will look for a

Hardship

place on a ship, but he has not eaten for two days,

and his stomach is cramping, and his feet and legs

are sore from walking the long distance, but that was

all right since he was used to hardships!!

Marcus -- stumbling along bent over holding his belly, his

face contorted and obviously in severe discomfort.

The third scene shows Marcus sleeping on the floor of a

filthy room with only an old rug over him.

Off-stage announcer -- Marcus found no bed at the inn

when he stopped in town and so he was obliged to

sleep on the hard floor, but that was all right because

he is used to hardships.

Marcus -- He twists and turns in discomfort as he lies on

the floor.

The fourth scene shows Marcus and a stack of boxes, and

crates on a pier with a Roman cargo ship and a gangway

to the ship at the pier.

Off-stage Announcer -- Marcus has found a job on a

ship but his immediate task is to carry a large amount

of cargo on board the ship, but that was all right

because he was used to hardships.

Hardship

Marcus -- Is staggering up a gangplank with a huge box in

his hands. He is limping and very tired.

The fifth scene is a small Roman ship in a stormy seaway,

rolling heavily and Marcus, in his ragged clothes, soaking

wet, is at the top of the mast some forty feet above the

deck.

Off-stage announcer -- Marcus has been sent to the top

of the mast to untangle some lines. Suddenly a

whipping of the mast tip flings Marcus off of the mast

and he lands flat on the deck!!!!!! -- But that is all right

because he is used to HARD SHIPS!!!!!!!!



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75898 From: rory12001 Date: 2010-05-28
Subject: Re: Winning Entry: Gaius Petronius Dexter - Theatrical Comedy Sketch
M. Hortensia G. Petronio spd;
Ecastor! comme vous me faisez rire cher Dexter. L'esprit gallique.


--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "luciaiuliaaquila" <luciaiuliaaquila@...> wrote:
>
>
> Gods' advice : Shall Nova Roma become a club or a nation ?
>
>
>
> Warning : the author introduces Gods and Goddesses as Plautus or
> Aristophanes did in their comic plays, he does not want to hurt anybody
> on his beliefs, please, only imagine Gods and Goddesses participating to
> the Megalesia, playing and smiling but never badly mocked. Moreover,
> they gently are making fun certain individuals of Nova Roma, as you
> shall can guess.
>
>
>
> ----------------------------------
>
>
>
> Mercury, the messenger of the Gods convenes all the Olympians to order
> with this agenda.
>
>
>
> Mercury :
>
> - Considering that :
>
> - I have informed the Gods of my intent convening on the
> Capitoline Hill on Apr. 6 (msg Gods_List # 3273012 and
> Superi_Romani_List # 9875916579);
>
> - I have taken, in conformity of decretum "Collegii
> pontificum et augurum de iure auspicandi et tripudio" (a.d. IV Non. Dec.
> 2756 auc), the auspicia relative to the session of the Olympian Gods of
> the present convening;
>
> - the auspices taken at dawn a.d. VIII Id. Apr. 2763 auc,
> have been favorable and that the Collegium Augurum duly informed of
> their taking and result;
>
> Quod bonum felixque sit populo romano quiritibus, and after due
> consultation of my little bird, I edict the following and referio ad
> vos, Di inmortales:
>
> - Art. 1 : The Gods are hereby convened for a session. Their
> advice and/or decision are asked, in the frame of this session, on the
> agenda presented in the following relatio :
>
> - Art. following the previous one : According the
> informations received from the censors, the Gods are the following ones,
> designed by the abbreviation of their names, who are therefore convened
> to the present session. Their list is thus reputed to be the Album
> Deorum on Kal. Ian. 2763 auc and at the present date:
>
>
>
> J
>
> Jupiter
>
> J
>
> Juno
>
> N
>
> Neptune
>
> C
>
> Ceres
>
> V
>
> Vesta
>
> M
>
> Minerva
>
> M
>
> Mars
>
> V
>
> Venus
>
> V
>
> Vulcan
>
> A
>
> Apollo
>
> D
>
> Diana
>
> M
>
> Mercury
>
> (Gods are ordered according to the random and, in a same category,
> their seniority in the Mount Olympus; the Gods having resigned and
> reintegrated are placed at the end of their category).
>
> - Art. following: The Gods will be asked to issue a vote on
> certain items, not on other ones which are proposed to the Capitoline
> Hill either for their information, or for discussion so that a further
> decision may be taken in the best environment as possible. The relatio
> will specify the type of each of its items (information, discussion,
> discussion +vote) ;
>
> -1.2. Session
>
> Beginning: Before tea time.
>
> -1.1. Contio
>
> Beginning: After tea time.
>
> -1.3. Vote
>
> Beginning: After the contio.
>
> - Art. 2a . 89 : The agenda of the present session is the
> following one:
>
>
>
> Item I and… unic – Will Nova Roma become a club or a
> nation ?
>
> (discussion +vote).
>
>
>
> *J* - As father of the Gods I speak firstÂ…
>
> *D* - The reign of the fathers, Jove, are overÂ… now time is Youngs'
> ! So let me speak first.
>
> *J* - I agree, darling daughter, but please do not call me "Jove". Call
> me simply JupiterÂ…
>
> *D* - Hem! When I was hunting, with my dogs around me, I saw an
> omenÂ…
>
> *V* - What kind of men did you see, Diana ?
>
> *D* - Dear Vulcan, I beg your pardon, but it is not divine to interrupt
> a goddess. Let me tell you the omen I sawÂ…
>
> *J* - Yes, as father of the gods, I want to hear your omen about Nova
> Roma, dear Diana. I am sure that it was crushing, dear princessÂ…
>
> *D* - Yes, indeed! Under a bridgeÂ…
>
> *V* - I guess it was at Paris.
>
> *D* - Not at allÂ… this time Paris was not the problem.
>
> *M* - This dope, indeed, preferred the Venus' beauty to my wisdomÂ…
> and you dare to say that he is not a problem?
>
> *V* - Shut up, Minerva! Paris was right in his judgement. I am the more
> beautiful of all the goddesses.
>
> *D* - But, sisters, please, be quiet! I have to tell you my omen about
> Nova RomaÂ…
>
> *A* - Yeap! Lovely Diana, my blood sister, explain us your omenÂ… you
> know that I am the God of the divination and you can trust in me. I
> might read the secret meaningsÂ…
>
> *M* - I trust in a god! As obviously Dollars say.
>
> *V* - Dollars? Oh Mercury, tell me, are they a new concept?
>
> *M* - Yes, Vesta, indeed! Green concept by which we measure our brain.
>
> *V* - I knew the John Lennon lyrics "a concept by which we measure our
> pain" not yours.
>
> *M* - Obviously, I just found it.
>
> *D* - Can I obtain a complete silence, please? I want to share with all
> of you the omen I saw about Nova Roma! Do not forget that we have to
> vote about our item: "Shall Nova Roma become a club or a nation?".
>
> *A* - Shall or will?
>
> *D* - Oh nooo! You remind me an old and nasty discussionÂ…
>
> *J* - Not a nasty discussion, but a verbiage. Now, darling daughter,
> tell us the omen that you saw under a bridge, please.
>
> *D* - Ok, dad. This morning, when I was hunting with my dogs around me I
> came to a bridge. Obviously the bridge is a path, a crossing sign, as
> everybody knows. And I saw a little bird passing under the arch of the
> bridge, brushing against water.
>
> *A* - By the club of Hercule! I understand the omen! It is a great and
> favorable sign!
>
> *C* - What does it mean, Apollo?
>
> *A* - Ceres! My dear Ceres! It means Nova Roma shall be a nation.
>
> *D* - Really? How do you explain that by this omen?
>
> *A* - Because the little bird said to me. Nova Romans shall cross the
> bridge when they come to it. Crossing a bridge, obviously, is a sign of
> nation birth.
>
>
>
> End.
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75899 From: marcushoratius Date: 2010-05-28
Subject: a. d. V Kalendas Iunonias: The Sacred Grove of the Dea Dia
M. Moravius Piscinus Horatianus Quiritibus cultoribus Deorum et omnibus salutem plurimam dicit: Vos quod fexitis, Deos omnes fortunare velim.

Hodie est ante diem V Kalendas Iunonias; haec dies comitialis est

"VII IDUS NOV [7 Nov 224 C.E.] the Fratres Arvales assembled in the Grove of the Dea Dia on the Via Campana, at the fifth milestone, on the instruction of magister Caius Porcius Priscus, and there they made sacrifice because in a violent storm some trees in the sacred grove of Dea Dia were struck by lightning and burnt; and in expiation for the uprooting of those trees, striking them with iron and consuming them in fire, for grinding down their remains and then for replacing them with others, and for initiating the work and rebuilding altars for the occasion, sacred to Dea Dia. In expiation for these things a purification sacrifice was carried out with an offering of a suovetaurilia [mature boar, ram, and bull]. Then in front of the temple cows, with their horns bound in gold, were sacrificed to the Dea Dia, a total of two; then at the altars built for the occasion sacrifices were made to the Gods as listed: to Janus Pater two rams; to Jupiter two castrated rams; to Mars Pater Ultor two rams; to the deity, male or female, two castrated rams; to the juno of Dea Dia two sheep; to the Virgines divae two sheep; to the Famuli divi two castrated rams; to the Lares two sheep; to Fons two castrated rams; to Flora two sheep; to Summanus Pater two black castrated rams; to Vesta Mater . . . of the Gods and Goddesses two sheep; likewise to Adolenda and Coinquenda two sheep; and, before the Caesareum, to the genius of our lord, the emperor Severus Alexander, a bull with gilded horns; likewise to the twenty divi twenty castrated rams." ~ CIL vi.2107, lines 2-13; ILS 5048


Grove of the Dea Dia

Along the Via Campana, at the fifth mile outside Rome beyond the Tiber, there once stood the sacred grove of Dea Dia (La Magliana, 9 km south of Rome). On a low elevation, secluded, obscured by the grove, this woodland clearing (locus) held the temple of Dea Dia (aedes), a Caesareum for the Imperial cult, a tetrastylum (a dinning hall with four columns), a bath, and a circus for races. Discovered in this grove, between 1570-1869, were ninety-six marble tablets inscribed with the Acta Fratrum Arvalium (AFA). These detail the rites and membership of the Imperial sodalitas of the Fratres Arvales, fragments of the record extend over the years 21 BCE to 304 C. E.

One of the earliest acts of the Augustan Restoration was an introduction in 29 B. C. E. of the sodalitas of the Fratres Arvales. In doing so Augustus claimed to be restoring an ancient institution of Rome, yet there is no record before his time of such an organized fraternity as we know it to have existed in the imperial period. There is no mention of the Fratres Arvales made by Tacitus, himself a priest who paid close attention to the state cults. Lucan described in lavish detail the lustratio of the city boundaries made in January 49 C.E. About the mixed congregation that performed this ceremony, Lucan mentioned every type of Roman priest down to the Sodales Titii, but without any mention of the Fratres Arvales. Lucan described the lustratio, "next you order the (victims) entirely quaking in terror to go around the citizens of the City." But these instructions come from an Etruscan priest and not from any Fratres Arvales as we might expect. Not in Martial, nor Statius, not with Ovid, Symmachus or Macrobius are any Fratres Arvales mentioned. Even Suetonius, in writing about the Augustan Restoration of various collegia, does not mention the Fratres Arvales. It is only with Varro, who died two years before the formation of the Fratres Arvales, that some mention is of arvales, who "make a public sacrifice to bring forth the fruits of the fields (Lingua Latinae 5.85)." But Varro's arvales do no refer to the Imperial Fratres Arvales. At best they might indicate two sermons performing such a rite as is known from other places in Italy.

Macrobius has a character in the Saturnalia quote from Festus telling of a rite made to benefit the fertility of wheat fields. The character offers in support two passages from Virgil where mention is also made of sacrificial victims being led in procession around wheat fields. A further passage from Paulus (8th cent.), quoting an otherwise unknown passage from Festus, names this rite as an ambarvalia conducted by "two brothers" (Macrobius, Saturnalia 3.5.7). quotation of Masurius Sabinus found in Pliny the Elder and Gellius: "In the earliest days of Rome Romulus instituted the Priests of the Fields and named himself the twelfth of their number (Pliny Historia Natura 18.6; Gellius Attic Nights 7.7.8)." This legend was invented at the time of Tiberius, a romantic projection back in time to explain the Fratres Arvales. Based on this quotation, Antonius Augustinus, Archbishop of Tarragon, later amended the passage from Paulus of "two brothers" into "duodecim fratres" to account for a priesthood of twelve members. In the 19th and early 20th centuries scholars accepted Antonius Augustinus over what the ancient sources provided. More recently this emendation was questioned by A. Momigliano and A. Alfoldi who pointed out that in Festus "the duo fratres are clearly Romulus and Remus (A. Momigliano, JRS LIII (1963); A. Alfodi, Early Rome and the Latins, 1965, p. 299)." The Acta itself shows that in no period was there a set number of Fratres, nor that all would be present to conduct rites.

As with the example above, what the Acta Fratrum Arvalum records is of great interest. It is our most complete record of ritual performances over a period of several years. At the same time it serves us as a cautionary example not to rely too heavily on modern interpretations by others.


AUC 168 / 585 BCE: The Battle of the Halys

In the sixth year a battle took place in which it happened, when the fight had begun, that suddenly the day became night. And this change of the day Thales the Milesian had foretold to the Ionians laying down as a limit this very year in which the change took place. The Lydians however and the Medes, when they saw that it had become night instead of day, ceased from their fighting and were much more eager both of them that peace should be made between them. ~ Herodotus 1.74

The Battle of Halys is sometimes called the Battle of the Eclipse. It was famous because it was the first time a Greek had been able to predict an eclipse, showing that it was a natural event. But both the Medes and the Lydians assumed it was a sign of the anger of the Gods over their continued fighting, and so not only did they end the battle but also their war. Calculating backward, we know that the eclipse took place in this region on 28 May 585 BCE.


AUC 773 / 20 CE: Drusus, son of Tiberius, celebrates an ovation for his victories in Illyicum.


Our thought for today is taken from Seneca the Younger, Epistle 96, on facing hardships:

"In spite of all do you still chafe and complain, not understanding that, in all the evils to which you refer, there is really only one - the fact that you do chafe and complain? If you ask me, I think that for a man there is no misery unless there be something in the universe which he thinks miserable. I shall not endure myself on that day when I find anything unendurable. I am ill; but that is a part of my lot. My slaves have fallen sick, my income has gone off, my house is rickety, I have been assailed by losses, accidents, toil, and fear; this is a common thing. Nay, that was an understatement; it was an inevitable thing. Such affairs come by order, and not by accident. if you will believe me, it is my inmost emotions that I am just now disclosing to you: when everything seems to go hard and uphill, I have trained myself not merely to obey God, but to agree with His decisions."
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75900 From: marcushoratius Date: 2010-05-28
Subject: Explorator 13.05
================================================================
explorator 13.05 May 23, 2010
================================================================
Editor's note: Most urls should be active for at least eight
hours from the time of publication.

For your computer's protection, Explorator is sent in plain text
and NEVER has attachments. Be suspicious of any Explorator which
arrives otherwise!!!
================================================================
================================================================
Thanks to Arthur Shippee, Dave Sowdon, David Critchley,
Diana Wright,Donna Hurst, Edward Rockstein, Joan Griffith,
Joos Postma, Rick Heli, Eoin C. Bairéad, Hernan Astudillo,
Barnea Selavan, Kurt Theis, John McMahon, Joseph Lauer,
Mata Kimasitayo,Mike Ruggeri, Richard C. Griffiths,
Rochelle Altman,and Ross W. Sargent for headses upses this week
(as always hoping I have left no one out).

================================================================
EARLY HUMANS
================================================================
A roundup of recent proto-human finds:

http://news.discovery.com/human/get-ready-for-more-proto-humans.html

... but the focus is homo gautengensis:

http://www.physorg.com/news193578492.html
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/36177857/ns/technology_and_science-science/
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/home/science/Skull-reveals-new-human-ancestor\
-light-short/articleshow/5960055.cms

... and DNA from that Siberian finger bone we mentioned a while
back:

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2010/03/100325100848.htm

Feature on Neandertals:

http://chronicle.com/blogPost/Neandertals/24171/
================================================================
ANCIENT NEAR EAST AND EGYPT
================================================================
A large statue of Thoth was unearthed in Luxor (and may indicate
where the 'avenue of the Colossi is':

http://www.earthtimes.org/articles/show/323896,statue-of-ancient-deity-found-in-\
egypt.html
http://www.news24.com/SciTech/News/Egypt-Red-granite-Thoth-found-20100516
http://english.people.com.cn/90001/90777/90851/6987015.html
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/science/archaeology/news/colossal-statue-of-th\
oth-discovered-at-temple-of-amenhotep-iii-in-luxor-1975371.html
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/37191881/ns/technology_and_science-science/
http://news.discovery.com/archaeology/avenue-of-colossi-may-be-buried-at-temple-\
of-tuts-grandfather.html
http://english.peopledaily.com.cn/90001/90777/90855/6986808.html

What they're learning from some of Tut's leftover bandages:

http://news.discovery.com/archaeology/king-tut-bandages-mummification.html

Synchrotron analysis of some Egyptian beads:

http://www.abc.net.au/science/articles/2010/05/18/2902688.htm

57 18th dynasty tombs from Lahoun:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/05/23/AR2010052301822.\
html

Feature on the Denderah Zodiac:

http://eands.caltech.edu/articles/lxvi4/buchwald.html

More on that brouhaha over hospital expansion in Ashkelon:

http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/rss/-/2/hi/middle_east/8685657.stm
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100516/ap_on_re_mi_ea/ml_israel_ancient_graves_9
http://www.haaretz.com/print-edition/news/israel-graves-in-ashkelon-er-row-are-b\
yzantine-not-jewish-1.290547
http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20100520/wl_mideast_afp/israelreligionjudaismarchaeo\
logy_20100520152513
http://news.scotsman.com/world/Ancient-cemetery-39is-not-Jewish39.6309972.jp
http://www.jpost.com/Israel/Article.aspx?id=175732
http://www.haaretz.com/print-edition/news/haredim-riot-in-jerusalem-after-bones-\
removed-from-barzilai-hospital-site-1.290735

... and a recent pagan altar find is supporting archaeologists'
identification of the site as 'pagan':

http://www.antiquities.org.il/about_eng.asp?Modul_id=14
http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-3892222,00.html
http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-3890540,00.html
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2010/05/20/world/main6503009.shtml
http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/nationworld/2011911585_apmlisraelancientgr\
aves.html?syndication=rss
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/37258852/ns/technology_and_science-science/
http://www.google.com/hostednews/afp/article/ALeqM5jbo2HzQY1D88-2NM1xvIP6-4xZuQ
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/05/20/AR2010052002509.\
html

... related:

http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5ikJf2Yoq4wB9rpWUcKIO7UojiAtwD9\
FPCLCO2

The state of archaeological sites in Israel:

http://www.globalpost.com/print/5543866

A project to preserve heritage on the West Bank:

http://www.alphagalileo.org/ViewItem.aspx?ItemId=76403&CultureCode=en

Feature on Meroe:

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/05/22/arts/22iht-melik22.html

A project to figure out the original Torah text:

http://www.jpost.com/Israel/Article.aspx?id=176056

Not sure if we've mentioned this incipient saga of burials at the
Museum of Tolerance yet:

http://palestinenote.com/cs/blogs/news/archive/2010/05/18/museum-of-tolerance-un\
earths-thousands-of-skeletons.aspx

Review of Itamar Singer, *The Hittites and Their Civilization*:

http://www.haaretz.com/culture/arts-leisure/ancient-history-the-hittites-thousan\
d-gods-1.7388

More on that aqueduct/bridge associated with the Sultan's Pool:

http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-3889581,00.html

Review of Hayim Tawil (et al), *Crown of Aleppo*:

http://www.forward.com/articles/128121/

Egyptology News Blog:

http://egyptology.blogspot.com/

Egyptology Blog:

http://www.egyptologyblog.co.uk/

Dr Leen Ritmeyer's Blog:

http://blog.ritmeyer.com/

Paleojudaica:

http://paleojudaica.blogspot.com/

Persepolis Fortification Archives:

http://persepolistablets.blogspot.com/

Archaeologist at Large:

http://spaces.msn.com/members/ArchaeologyinEgypt/
================================================================
ANCIENT GREECE AND ROME (AND CLASSICS)
================================================================
Plenty of coverage of the recovery of some Archaic kouroi from
Greece:

http://www.artdaily.com/index.asp?int_sec=2&int_new=38133
http://www.cbc.ca/arts/artdesign/story/2010/05/19/greece-statues-recovered-looti\
ng-smuggling.html
http://www.ana.gr/anaweb/user/showplain?maindoc=8730333&maindocimg=8730478&servi\
ce=144
http://www.boston.com/news/world/europe/articles/2010/05/18/greek_police_seize_2\
_statues_from_2_farmers
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/05/18/AR2010051801728.\
html
http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5hHCJhzzjaMqj_hEm55ClrPFKUCXAD9\
FPBD1O0
http://www.ekathimerini.com/4dcgi/_w_articles_politics_100004_19/05/2010_117154
http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=126906852
http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/wire/sns-ap-eu-greece-archaeology-twin-s\
tatues,0,1612376.story
http://ekathimerini.com/4dcgi/_w_articles_politics_100004_19/05/2010_117154

Hellenistic/Roman burials from Protaras ... and possibly another one; the
two Art Daily pieces seem to be writing about different things:

http://www.artdaily.com/index.asp?int_sec=2&int_new=38148
http://www.artdaily.org/index.asp?int_sec=2&int_new=38211
http://www.cyprus-mail.com/cyprus/four-sarcophagi-found-protaras-tomb/20100519
http://www.kansascity.com/2010/05/19/1955652/cyprus-crews-stumble-on-2-millenia.\
html
http://www.statesman.com/news/nation/cyprus-crews-stumble-on-2-millennia-old-cof\
fins-696277.html
http://www.ajc.com/news/nation-world/cyprus-crews-stumble-on-530432.html
http://www.timesofmalta.com/articles/view/20100519/world-news/workmen-unearth-an\
cient-coffins
http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5jxW2v4b9cDiWFJt0vOgPuDFErwoQD9\
FPSUP80
http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5jxW2v4b9cDiWFJt0vOgPuDFErwoQD9\
FPQPOO0
http://abcnews.go.com/Entertainment/wireStory?id=10677360

Not sure if we've mentioned these finds from Strumica or not:

http://www.balkantravellers.com/en/read/article/1963

Adrienne Mayor tells us her five favourite books on enemies of Rome:

http://fivebooks.com/interviews/adrienne-mayor-on-enemies-ancient-rome


Marking the anniversary of the discovery of the Antikythera
Mechanism:

http://www.wired.com/thisdayintech/2010/05/0517antikythera-discovered/

Richard Billows on the impact of Marathon:

http://thedartmouth.com/2010/05/18/news/billows

A couple of opeds about the state of preservation of Rome's monuments:

http://www.newsweek.com/id/238183?from=rss
http://www.aolnews.com/world/article/is-romes-ancient-heritage-crumbling/1947784\
6

A Latin student of the year (and a teacher too):

http://www.midlothianexchange.com/index.php/news/article/midlothian-latin-studen\
t-and-teacher-win-top-state-awards/22760/

Interview with a recent Classics grad:

http://www.livearts-fringe.org/blog/index.cfm/2010/5/19/Whats-so-funny-about-Pla\
utus-Lets-ask-Mara-Miller

They're still hyping purported finds of tombs ascribed to Tony
and Cleo:

http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2010/05/100519-science-ancient-egypt-cle\
opatra-tomb-marc-antony/
http://weekly.ahram.org.eg/2010/999/cu11.htm

... and we've been blogging about it, of course:

http://rogueclassicism.com/2010/05/20/more-cleopatra-tomb-stuff/
http://rogueclassicism.com/2010/05/21/the-curse-of-cleopatra/

Review of *Lost Books of the Odyssey*:

http://www.ft.com/cms/s/2/0a82442c-5ecd-11df-af86-00144feab49a.html

http://weekly.ahram.org.eg/2010/999/cu11.htm

Latest reviews from Scholia:

http://www.classics.ukzn.ac.za/reviews/

Latest reviews from BMCR:

http://bmcr.brynmawr.edu/recent.html

Visit our blog:

http://rogueclassicism.com/
================================================================
EUROPE AND THE UK (+ Ireland)
================================================================
Latest C14 dating puts Stonehenge at 3400 years b.p.:

http://feeds.wired.com/~r/wired/index/~3/U8nj9-cSP7Y/

Not sure if this 5th-century swastika on a Bulgarian pot is a
recent find or not:

http://www.novinite.com/view_news.php?id=116358

Interesting (pregnant) burial on an Iron Age battle site in
Derbyshire:

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/england/derbyshire/8691348.stm

Finds from various periods from a site at Wilberforce College:

http://www.thisishullandeastriding.co.uk/news/Archaeological-finds-dating-1-000-\
years-unearthed-Wilberforce-College/article-2200960-detail/article.html

... while remains of an Anglo-Saxon settlement have been found
at All Saints' Academy in Cheltenham:

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/england/gloucestershire/8691565.stm

... and they're digging at Berkeley Castle again:

http://news.bbc.co.uk/local/bristol/hi/people_and_places/history/newsid_8689000/\
8689231.stm

This week's facial reconstruction is of that 'knight' found during
Stirling Castle renovations:

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/scotland/tayside_and_central/8687199.stm
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/scotland/tayside_and_central/10138060.stm
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/science/science-news/7736059/Face-of-medieval-knight-\
reconstructed-by-computers.html

Latest on the HMS Victory:

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/guernsey/8687441.stm

More on Egyptian Blue in a Romanesque altar:

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2010/05/100505102557.htm

More on Nottingham caves:

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/05/18/science/18obcaves.html

Archaeology in Europe Blog:

http://archaeology-in-europe.blogspot.com/
================================================================
ASIA AND THE SOUTH PACIFIC
================================================================

Evidence of human sacrifice 3300 years b.p. at Huanbei:

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/science/archaeology/news/human-sacrifices-disc\
overed-at-torched-shang-dynasty-city-huanbei-1975492.html

Feature on the excavation of Cao Xiu's tomb:

http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/photo/2010-05/18/content_9863318.htm

In case you missed it last week, those recently-found terracotta
warriors still have traces of their original paint:

http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/china/2010-05/19/content_9865396.htm
http://www.digitaljournal.com/article/291958

Some copper furnaces from north of Ha Noi:

http://vietnamnews.vnagency.com.vn/Life-Style/Antiques-Relics/199808/Archaeologi\
sts-unearth-Metal-Age-furnaces.html

Some 'panchaloka' idols have been found:

http://www.ptinews.com/news/661953_Ancient--panchaloka--idols-unearthed

... as have some Chola icons and copper plates:

http://beta.thehindu.com/news/states/tamil-nadu/article434818.ece

A couple of Harappan sites from Surendranagar:

http://www.indianexpress.com/news/Two-Harappan-sites-unearthed-in-Surendranagar/\
620640

A Brahmi stone inscription from Guwahati:

http://www.assamtribune.com/scripts/detailsnew.asp?id=may2210/at096

Brief feature on Pattanam (nothing new, I don't think):

http://www.thehindu.com/2010/05/16/stories/2010051654382600.htm

East Asian Archaeology:

http://eastasiablog.wordpress.com/2010/05/20/east-asian-archaeology-cultural-her\
itage-%E2%80%93-2052010/

Using pigs, dogs, and chickens to track human migration in the
South Pacific:

http://bigpondnews.com/articles/OddSpot/2010/05/18/Ancient_pigs_help_colonisatio\
n_study_463181.html

I think we mentioned a few weeks ago that highway construction
in China's Yunnan province had damaged a city wall; the city
officials involved have been punished:

http://english.people.com.cn/90001/90776/90882/6988700.html

Feature(s) on the Grand Trunk Road:

http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=127024473

Southeast Asian Archaeology Newsblog:

http://www.southeastasianarchaeology.com/

New Zealand Archaeology eNews:

http://www.nzarchaeology.org/netsubnews.htm
================================================================
NORTH AMERICA
================================================================
They're still poking around Port Angeles:

http://www.seattlepi.com/local/6420ap_wa_port_angeles_settlements.html

Erosion threatens artifacts on Alaska's coast:

http://www.anchoragepress.com/articles/2010/05/19/news/doc4bf46dd8b550c180204696\
.txt

What they're finding at the Rankin House dig (Ohio):

http://news.cincinnati.com/article/20100519/NEWS01/5200326/Rankin+house++puzzle+\
pieces++unearthed

They're poking around (sort of) the Great Circle Earthworks:

http://www.newarkadvocate.com/article/20100519/NEWS01/5190309

The endangered historic places list:

http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20100519/lf_nm_life/us_usa_endangered

Still looking for traces of deSoto (and other things):

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/05/21/arts/design/21antiques.html

Nice APOD of the Milky Way over the Great Gallery on the walls of
Horseshoe Canyon:

http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/ap100519.html

Review of Nick Bunker, *Making Haste from Babylon*:

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/05/23/books/review/Shorto-t.html

Review of Barbara Kerley, *The Extraordinary Mark Twain*:

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/05/16/books/review/Cohen-t.html
================================================================
CENTRAL AND SOUTH AMERICA
================================================================
Remember those footprints found in Mexican volcanic ash a few
years ago? Here's an interesting turn:

http://www.usatoday.com/tech/science/columnist/vergano/2010-05-16-footprints_N.h\
tm

Possible oldest pyramid burial in Mexico (Chiapas):

http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2010/05/100518-oldest-pyramid-tomb-zoque\
-mexico-science/
http://www.artdaily.org/index.asp?int_sec=2&int_new=38119
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/05/18/science/18tomb.html (JNW)
http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/rss/-/2/hi/americas/8689046.stm
http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/2010/may/18/archaeology-pyramid-tomb-mexico-ol\
mec
http://www.post-gazette.com/pg/10138/1059004-115.stm?cmpid=healthscience.xml
http://www.3news.co.nz/Ancient-pyramid-tomb-discovered-in-Mexico/tabid/1160/arti\
cleID/156347/Default.aspx?ArticleID=156347
http://www.timesofmalta.com/articles/view/20100518/world-news/archaeologists-une\
arth-ancient-tomb
http://www.stuff.co.nz/world/americas/3710349/Ancient-tomb-unearthed-in-Mexico
http://www.sltrib.com/news/ci_15129548?source=rss
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100518/ap_on_sc/lt_mexico_pyramid_tomb
http://www.physorg.com/news193379449.html
http://www.forbes.com/feeds/ap/2010/05/17/science-lt-mexico-pyramid-tomb_7613160\
.html?boxes=financechannelAP

... nice follow up:

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/05/18/science/18tomb.html?ref=todayspaper

... and a slideshow:

http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2010/05/photogalleries/100518-oldest-pyr\
amid-tomb-zoque-mexico-science-pictures/?now=2010-05-18-00:01#mexico-tomb-jade-b\
achand-closer-aerial_20360_600x450.jpg

... and a Moche pyramid from Peru connected with the copper industry:

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/science/archaeology/news/new-pyramid-discovere\
d-in-peru-linked-to-ancient-copper-industry-1979529.html

Chimu tombs from Peru:

http://www.andina.com.pe/Ingles/Noticia.aspx?id=j29ydN+VqNM=

The largest known monotlith of Tlatecuhtli is going on display:

http://www.physorg.com/news193465685.html
http://uk.news.yahoo.com/18/20100519/tsc-giant-aztec-earth-goddess-to-show-in-c2\
ff8aa.html

White explorers to the Caribbean apparently had problems identifying
smiles:

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/science/7732776/White-explorers-couldnt-recognise-a-s\
mile-on-native-symbols.html

Nice photos of that LiDAR-related find we've been talking about
for the past couple of weeks:

http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2010/05/photogalleries/100520-ancient-ma\
ya-city-belize-science-pictures/?now=2010-05-20-00:01

... and claims arising therefrom that the Mayans were 'green' builders:

http://news.cnet.com/8301-11128_3-20004775-54.html

... and more on the LiDAR thing in general:

http://www.upi.com/Science_News/2010/05/18/Space-technology-used-to-study-the-Ma\
ya/UPI-17281274194585/

Mike Ruggeri's Ancient Americas Breaking News:

http://web.mac.com/michaelruggeri

Ancient MesoAmerica News:

http://ancient-mesoamerica-news-updates.blogspot.com/
================================================================
OTHER ITEMS OF INTEREST
================================================================
Potato history:

http://www.dailyadvance.com/news/baked-fried-or-boiled-potatoes-make-great-story\
-23025

Celebrating Byron's swimming of the Hellespont:

http://www.metro.co.uk/lifestyle/travel/827135-swimming-the-dardanelles-in-the-w\
ake-of-lord-byron

On the history of the portolan chart/medieval map making:

http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/nationworld/2011931718_maps23.htmlel

... and a related conference at the LOC:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/05/21/AR2010052104713.\
html

Interesting forgery detective story type thing:

http://www.artdaily.org/index.asp?int_sec=2&int_new=38209

... and an interesting Nazi art/loot story:

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/05/19/arts/design/19abroad.html

Simon Critchley defines philosopher:

http://opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/05/16/what-is-a-philosopher

The British Library plans to digitize an awful lot of newspapers:

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/7736936/British-Library-to-digitise-40-mil\
lion-pages-of-archived-newspapers.html

Copernicus' remains were reburied in a Polish cathedral:

http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/2010/05/22/world/AP-EU-Poland-Copernicus-Reburie\
d.html
http://uk.news.yahoo.com/18/20100522/tsc-copernicus-s-remains-reburied-in-pol-c2\
ff8aa.html

More on geographic models in archaeology:

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2010/05/100514094838.htm
================================================================
TOURISTY THINGS
================================================================
Greece:

http://travel.nytimes.com/2010/05/23/travel/23foraging.html
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/g/a/2010/05/22/rickstevesricksteves\
tmsarticlecfmid218.DTL

Greece (n the footsteps of Herodotus):

http://www.ft.com/cms/s/2/4c48e028-63aa-11df-a32b-00144feab49a.html

Santa Fe:

http://travel.nytimes.com/2010/05/23/travel/23hours.html

'Ecolodging' in Italy:

http://travel.nytimes.com/2010/05/23/travel/23journeys.html
================================================================
BLOGS AND PODCASTS
================================================================
About.com Archaeology:

http://archaeology.about.com/

Archaeology Briefs:

http://archaeologybriefs.blogspot.com/

Naked Archaeology Podcast:

http://www.thenakedscientists.com/HTML/podcasts/archaeology/

Taygete Atlantis excavations blogs aggregator:

http://planet.atlantides.org/taygete/

Time Machine:

http://heatherpringle.wordpress.com/
================================================================
CRIME BEAT
================================================================
In case you missed the big art theft in France this week:

http://www.news24.com/World/News/New-art-theft-in-France-20100522
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/05/21/world/europe/21theft.html
http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=127006718
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/05/22/world/europe/22iht-paris.html

Some previously-purloined artifacts were returned to Peru:

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/8693776.stm

More on execution of tomb robbers in China:

http://english.people.com.cn/90001/90782/90872/6987639.html

Looting Matters:

http://lootingmatters.blogspot.com/
================================================================
NUMISMATICA
================================================================
An old French coin from Israel (!):

http://english.peopledaily.com.cn/90001/90777/90854/6986780.html
http://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/news.aspx/137550
http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-3890004,00.html

Latest eSylum newsletter:

http://www.coinbooks.org/club_nbs_esylum_v13n20.html

More on the ancient coin legal dispute:

http://www.numismaster.com/ta/numis/Article.jsp?ad=article&ArticleId=10631

Ancient Coin Collecting:

http://ancientcoincollecting.blogspot.com/

Ancient Coins:

http://classicalcoins.blogspot.com/

Coin Link:

http://www.coinlink.com/News/
================================================================
EXHIBITIONS, AUCTIONS, AND MUSEUM-RELATED
================================================================
Birth of Impressionism:

http://www.artdaily.org/index.asp?int_sec=2&int_new=38183

Angels and Demons:

http://www.forward.com/articles/128111/

Charles Le Brun:

http://www.artdaily.org/index.asp?int_sec=2&int_new=38114

Heroes:

http://www.delmartimes.net/entertainment/269766-ancient-greek-heroes-take-center\
-stage-in-new-exhibit

Magna Carta:

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/05/22/arts/design/22magna.html

A Day in Pompeii:

http://www.abc.net.au/local/stories/2010/05/20/2904572.htm

A History of the World (BM)

http://www.bbc.co.uk/ahistoryoftheworld/explorerflash/

Lewis Chessmen going on tour and sparking some features:

http://news.scotsman.com/viewarticle.aspx?sectionid=7074&articleid=6312657
http://news.stv.tv/scotland/east-central/178691-lewis-chessmen-begin-scottish-to\
ur/
http://www.google.com/hostednews/ukpress/article/ALeqM5jKdO1Y5AR0Y6rBn4s7IDULLCB\
guA

Latest in the attempt to reclaim Nefertiti:

http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5hnsbuppIOEG2JqHdZ98-sZOHj-4wD9\
FS40KO0
http://www.earthtimes.org/articles/show/324483,nefertiti-staying-in-berlin-says-\
german-culture-minister.html

... and India seems to be getting on the repatriation bandwagon:

http://accra-mail.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=15946:india-i\
n-global-bid-to-get-back-treasures&catid=66:world&Itemid=215

Big bucks for a Chinese Jade bell:

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601088&sid=abDbnhDqLkhE

... and some Art Deco pieces:

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/05/21/arts/21iht-acajdeco.html

On collecting Shang Dynasty bronzes (scroll down):

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/05/21/arts/design/21vogel.html

Catholic Museum has financial difficulties:

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/05/18/arts/design/18catholic.html

More on the Cleveland Museum of Art's renovated antiquities section:

http://www.artdaily.org/index.asp?int_sec=2&int_new=38070

================================================================
PERFORMANCES AND THEATRE-RELATED
================================================================
Agora:

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/05/23/movies/23agora.html

Different versions of Robin Hood:

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/05/23/movies/homevideo/23kehr.html

Prince of Persia:

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/05/23/movies/23persia.html

African Dance:

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/05/23/arts/dance/23african.html
================================================================
OBITUARIES
================================================================
Moshe Greenberg:

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/05/20/arts/20greenberg.html
http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5g8s90vfsTs96D5kftFwvqaklKqIgD9\
FOKSCG0
================================================================
PODCASTS
================================================================
The Book and the Spade:

http://www.radioscribe.com/bknspade.htm

The Dig:

http://www.thedigradio.com/

Stone Pages Archaeology News:

http://news.stonepages.com/

Archaeologica Audio News:

http://www.archaeologychannel.org/AudioNews.asp
================================================================
EXPLORATOR is a weekly newsletter representing the fruits of
the labours of 'media research division' of The Atrium. Various
on-line news and magazine sources are scoured for news of the
ancient world (broadly construed: practically anything relating
to archaeology or history prior to about 1700 or so is fair
game) and every Sunday they are delivered to your mailbox free of
charge!
================================================================
Useful Addresses
================================================================
Past issues of Explorator are available on the web via our
Yahoo site:

http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/Explorator/

To subscribe to Explorator, send a blank email message to:

Explorator-subscribe@yahoogroups.com

To unsubscribe, send a blank email message to:

Explorator-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

To send a 'heads up' to the editor or contact him for other
reasons:

rogueclassicist@...
================================================================
Explorator is Copyright (c) 2010 David Meadows. Feel free to
distribute these listings via email to your pals, students,
teachers, etc., but please include this copyright notice. These
links are not to be posted to any website by any means (whether
by direct posting or snagging from a usenet group or some other
email source) without my express written permission. I think it
is only right that I be made aware of public fora which are
making use of content gathered in Explorator. Thanks!
================================================================
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75901 From: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com Date: 2010-05-29
Subject: Reminder Ludi Apollinares, 5/29/2010, 12:00 pm
Reminder from:   Nova-Roma Yahoo! Group
 
Title:   Reminder Ludi Apollinares
 
Date:   Saturday May 29, 2010
Time:   12:00 pm - 1:00 pm
Repeats:   This event repeats every week until Friday July 9, 2010.
Location:   Ludi Apollinares
Notes:   Don't forget to be inspired and start your project for the Ludi honoring Apollo!

http://www.novaroma.org/nr/MMDCCLXIII/Ludi_Apollinares
 
Copyright © 2010  Yahoo! Inc. All Rights Reserved | Terms of Service | Privacy Policy
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75902 From: marcushoratius Date: 2010-05-29
Subject: a. d. IV Kalendas Iunonias: Sacra Deae Diae; Battle of Argentovaria
M. Moravius Piscinus Horatianus Quiritibus cultoribus Deorum et omnibus salutem plurimam dicit: Di vos semper servent.

Hodie est ante diem IV Kalendas Iunonias; haec dies comitialis est: Drusus Caesar triumphans in urbem invectus est.

Sacra Deae Diae

In even-numbered years the Fratres Arvales performed a sacrifice for the mysterious Goddess they called Dea Dia on 19 May, as recorded below. In odd numbered years, as is our own AUC 2763, this sacrifice was instead made on 29 May. These were not public events, and indeed the only record is on their own Acta from the private grove of the Dea Dia outside Rome.

"XIV KAL JUN [19 May 87 C.E.]the Fratres Arvales performed sacrifices to Dea Dia. C. Salvius Liberalis, who was acting in place of the magister, C. Julius Silanus, in front of the grove sacrificed onto the altar two expiatory pigs in expiation for polluting the grove and the work to be carried out there. Then he sacrificed a cow as an offering to Dea Dia... [The five attending Arvales] sat down in the tetrastylum and feasted off the sacrifice, and taking up their togae praetextae and their wreaths made of ears of corn with woolen bands, they ascended the grove of Dea Dia with attendants clearing the way and through Salvius Liberalis Nonius Bassus, who was acting in place of the flamen, they sacrificed a choice lamb to Dea Dia and, when the sacrifice was complete, they all made a libation with incense and wine. Then, when the wreaths had been brought in [returning into the temple] and the statues perfumed, they made Q. Tillius Sassius annual magister from the coming Saturnalia to the next, likewise they made T. Julius Celsus Marius Candidus flamen. Then they went down to the tetrastylum, and there reclining in the triclinium they feasted in the presence of the magister, C. Julius Silanus. After the feast wearing a veil and sandals, with a wreath woven with roses, with an attendant clearing the way, he ascended above the starting gates [of the circus] and gave the signal to the four-horse chariots and the leapers, with L. Maecius Postumus presiding, he honored the victors with palms and silver wreaths. On the same day at Rome, in the house of the magister C. Julius Silanus, the same people who were in the grove dined." ~ CIL vi.2065, col. 2, lines 15-40; ILS 5037


AUC May 1131 / 378 CE: Battle of Argentovaria

"Soon after this transaction had been thus terminated, war was declared against the tribes of the Allemanni around Lentia, who had often made extensive incursions into the contiguous Roman territories. The emperor himself set out on the expedition, and went as far as Rhaetia, and the district of the Canini. And there, after long and careful deliberation, it was decided to be both honourable and expedient that Arbetio, the master of the horse, should march with a division of the troops, in fact with the greater part of the army, along the borders of the lake of Brigantia, with the object of coming to an immediate engagement with the barbarians.

"Arbetio not choosing to wait till messengers arrived to announce the approach of the barbarians, although he knew the fierce way in which they begin their wars, allowed himself to be betrayed into a hidden ambush, where he stood without the power of moving, being bewildered by the suddenness of his disaster.

"In the mean time the enemy, showing themselves, sprang forth from their hiding-places and spared not one who came in their way, but overwhelmed them with every kind of weapon. For none of our men could offer the smallest resistance, nor was there any hope of any of them being able to save their lives except by a speedy flight. Therefore, being intent only on avoiding wounds, our soldiers, losing all order, ran almost at random in every direction, exposing their backs to the blows of the enemy. Nevertheless the greater part of them, scattering themselves among narrow paths, were saved from danger by the protecting darkness of the night, and at the return of day recovered their courage and rejoined their different legions. But still by this sad and unexpected disaster a vast number of common soldiers and ten tribunes were slain.

"The Allemanni were greatly elated at this event, and advanced with increased boldness, every day coming up to the fortifications of the Romans while the morning mists obscured the light; and drawing their swords roamed about in every direction, gnashing their teeth, and threatening us with haughty shouts. Then with a sudden sally our Scutarii would rush forth, and after being stopped for a moment by the resistance of the hostile squadrons, would call out all their comrades to join them in the engagement.

"But the greater part of our men were alarmed by the recollection of their recent disaster, and Arbetio hesitated, thinking everything pregnant with danger. Upon this three tribunes at once sallied forth, Arintheus who was a lieutenant commander of the heavy troops, Seniauchus who commanded the cavalry of the Comites, and Bappo who had the command of the Promoti and of those troops who had been particularly intrusted to his charge by the emperor.

"These men, looking on the common cause as their own, resolved to repel the violence of the enemy according to the example of their ancient comrades. And pouring down upon the foe like a torrent, not in a regular line of battle, but in desultory attacks like those of banditti, they put them all to flight in a disgraceful manner. Since they, being in loose order and straggling, and hampered by their endeavours to escape, exposed their unprotected bodies to our weapons, and were slain by repeated blows of sword and spear.

"Many too were slain with their horses, and seemed as they lay on their backs to be so entangled as still to be sitting on them. And when this was seen, all our men who had previously hesitated to engage in battle with their comrades, poured forth out of the camp; and now, forgetful of all precautions, they drove before them the mob of barbarians, except such as flight had saved from destruction, trampling on the heaps of slain, and covered with gore.

"When the battle was thus terminated the emperor in triumph and joy returned to Milan to winter quarters." ~ Ammianus Marcellinus, Res gestae a fine Corneli Taciti 14.4.1, 7-13


Our thought for today is from Marcus Aurelius, Meditations 7.73:

"When thou hast done a good act and another has received it, why dost thou look for a third thing besides these, as fools do, either to have the reputation of having done a good act or to obtain a return?"
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75903 From: Timothy or Stephen Gallagher Date: 2010-05-29
Subject: In Honor of Memorial day in the USA
Salvete



In Honor of Memorial day in the USA



True Greatness



"Virtue conceal'd within our breast
Is inactivity at best:
But never shall the Muse endure
To let your virtues lie obscure;
Or suffer Envy to conceal
Your labours for the public weal.
Within your breast all wisdom lies,
Either to govern or advise;
Your steady soul preserves her frame,
In good and evil times, the same.
Pale Avarice and lurking Fraud,
Stand in your sacred presence awed;
Your hand alone from gold abstains,
Which drags the slavish world in chains.



Him for a happy man I own,
Whose fortune is not overgrown;[2]
And happy he who wisely knows
To use the gifts that Heaven bestows;
Or, if it please the powers divine,
Can suffer want and not repine.
The man who infamy to shun
Into the arms of death would run;
That man is ready to defend,
With life, his country or his friend."



-----Johathan Swift





Valete,



Ti. Galerius Paulinus



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75904 From: Maxima Valeria Messallina Date: 2010-05-29
Subject: Re: Winning Entries Ludi Megalenses 2763 AUC April 2010
Salve et salvete,
 
Yes, definitely take advantage of the lull. ;)
 
Congratulations to Gaius Cocceius Spinula, Gaius Equitius Cato, Gaius Tullius Valerianus Germanicus, Gaius Aquillius Rota, Marcus Minucius Audens, Quinta Sergia Alba (double congratulations for being the sole woman!), and Gaius Petronius Dexter!
 
Thank you to all those who organized the Ludi Megalenses. Job well done!
 
Vale et valete bene,
 
Maxima Valeria Messallina 

 
 


<<--- On Thu, 5/27/10, luciaiuliaaquila <luciaiuliaaquila@...> wrote:

Iulia Aquila Amicae, Amici Omnibusque S.P.D.

I shall take advantage today of a moment of free time, and also of the peace and quiet in the forum, to post on the Main List the winners of the Ludi Megalenses 2763 AUC we enjoyed from April 4 to April 10 2010.
I apologize for the delay but besides the political climate in the forum and voting; those comprising the Ædilician Cohors became extremely busy for various legitimate reasons in their private lives and in their duties in Nova Roma. The results, along with the Opening and Closing Ceremonies, were published in a timely manner on the Nova Roma website: http://novaroma.org/nr/Ludi_Megalenses_2763_AUC

Many thanks go out to the Ædilician Cohors and to the Ædile Jury: P. Annæus Constantinus Placidus, Cn. Cornelius Lentulus, M. Cornelius Gualterus Graecus, L. Iulia Aquila, C. Maria Caeca and A. Tullia Scholastica!

Special Thanks go to Pontifex Ti. Iulius Sabinus for the beautiful closing ceremony, Sacrifice to the Magna Mater!

Ædile Curule P. Annæus Constantinus Placidus thanks all who participated and congratulates all the winners!

The Winners:

Certamen Historicum Winner: Gaius Cocceius Spinula
Gaius Equitius Cato and Gaius Tullius Valerianus Germanicus are ex aequo at second place.

Lustratio Romæ (Artwork Contest) Winner: Gaius Aquillius Rota
Marcus Minucius Audens in a close second place
Honorable Mention to Quinta Sergia Alba
The entries, with descriptions, are posted here for all to enjoy:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/l_j_a/sets/72157624024168571/

Adumbratio Comœdia (Theatrical Comedy Sketch Writing Contest) Winner: Gaius Petronius Dexter
Marcus Minucius Audens is in a very close second place
These winning entries will be posted in a separate thread.

Valete et habete fortunam bonam!

L. Iulia Aquila>>




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75905 From: Cato Date: 2010-05-29
Subject: Re: In Honor of Memorial day in the USA
Cato omnibus in foro SPD

"Let us now praise famous men, and our fathers in their generations. The LORD apportioned to them great glory, His majesty from the beginning. There were those who ruled in their kingdoms, and were men renowned for their power, giving counsel by their understanding, and proclaiming prophecies; leaders of the people in their deliberations and in understanding of learning for the people, wise in their words of instruction; those who composed musical tunes, and set forth verses in writing; rich men furnished with resources, living peaceably in their habitations -- all these were honored in their generations, and were the glory of their times. There are some of them who have left a name, so that men declare their praise. And there are some who have no memorial, who have perished as though they had not lived; they have become as though they had not been born, and so have their children after them. But these were men of mercy, whose righteous deeds have not been forgotten; their prosperity will remain with their descendants, and their inheritance to their children's children. Their descendants stand by the covenants; their children also, for their sake. Their posterity will continue for ever, and their glory will not be blotted out. Their bodies were buried in peace, and their name lives to all generations. Peoples will declare their wisdom, and the congregation proclaims their praise." - Ecclesiasticus 44:1-15

Valete,

Cato



--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Timothy or Stephen Gallagher <spqr753@...> wrote:
>
>
> Salvete
>
>
>
> In Honor of Memorial day in the USA
>
>
>
> True Greatness
>
>
>
> "Virtue conceal'd within our breast
> Is inactivity at best:
> But never shall the Muse endure
> To let your virtues lie obscure;
> Or suffer Envy to conceal
> Your labours for the public weal.
> Within your breast all wisdom lies,
> Either to govern or advise;
> Your steady soul preserves her frame,
> In good and evil times, the same.
> Pale Avarice and lurking Fraud,
> Stand in your sacred presence awed;
> Your hand alone from gold abstains,
> Which drags the slavish world in chains.
>
>
>
> Him for a happy man I own,
> Whose fortune is not overgrown;[2]
> And happy he who wisely knows
> To use the gifts that Heaven bestows;
> Or, if it please the powers divine,
> Can suffer want and not repine.
> The man who infamy to shun
> Into the arms of death would run;
> That man is ready to defend,
> With life, his country or his friend."
>
>
>
> -----Johathan Swift
>
>
>
>
>
> Valete,
>
>
>
> Ti. Galerius Paulinus
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75906 From: M Iul Perusianus Date: 2010-05-29
Subject: I: [NR_Urbs] R:EDICTVM AEDILICIVM VII - DE TABVLARIO ET ALBO CIVIVM
L FABR MARO ET M IVL PERVSIANVS AED VRB CIVIBVS SPD

the new NR Urbs website at <http://nrurbs.wordpress.com/>
http://nrurbs.wordpress.com/ is ready and on line

Valete optime





_____

Da: NR_Urbs@yahoogroups.com [mailto:NR_Urbs@yahoogroups.com] Per conto di M
Iul Perusianus
Inviato: domenica 30 maggio 2010 0.35
A: NR_Italia@yahoogroups.com; NR urbs
Oggetto: [NR_Urbs] R:EDICTVM AEDILICIVM VII - DE TABVLARIO ET ALBO CIVIVM
VRBIS ROMAE





L FABR MARO ET M IVL PERVSIANVS AED VRB CIVIBVS SPD



Con la presente comunichiamo che il sito <http://nrurbs.wordpress.com/>
http://nrurbs.wordpress.com/ , come da editto allegato, è pronto e
consultabile



Valete optime





_____

Da: NR_Italia@yahoogroups.com [mailto:NR_Italia@yahoogroups.com] Per conto
di peraznanie
Inviato: lunedì 10 maggio 2010 16.08
A: NR_Italia@yahoogroups.com
Oggetto: [NR_Italia] EDICTVM AEDILICIVM VII - DE TABVLARIO ET ALBO CIVIVM
VRBIS ROMAE





EDICTVM AEDILICIVM VII - DE TABVLARIO ET ALBO CIVIVM VRBIS ROMAE
(Sistemazione del Tabularium e del'Album Civium dell'Urbs)

Come previsto dal Foedus di costituzione dell'Urbs si stabilisce quanto
segue.

I. Con questo editto viene istituito il nuovo sito internet ufficiale
dell'Urbs, in sostituzione del precedente, all'indirizzo internet
http://nrurbs. <http://nrurbs.wordpress.com/> wordpress.com/

II. Su questo sito sarà consultabile l'Album Civium dell'Urbs ed il
Tabularium, documenti ufficiali della Comunitas. Inoltre sono previste (come
sul vecchio sito), la lista degli incontri dei Cives Urbis ed i Fasti
Capitolini.

III . Il sito è in via di definizione è sarà completato, con le sezioni
descritte, entro un mese da oggi. L'Album Civium è già nella sua versione
definitiva.

Questo editto sostituisce il numero I del 16/01/2004.
DABAM ROMAE A.D. VI IDVS MAIAS ANNVN MMDCCLXIII AVC (Roma, 10 maggio 2010)

L FABR MARO ET M IVL PERVSIANVS AED VRB





[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75907 From: rory12001 Date: 2010-05-29
Subject: the devotio, examples of Roman valor in war
M. Hortensia quiritibus spd;
since tomorrow the manes of soldiers will be commemorated in many provincae in North America, I am posting in their honour, the greatest Roman example of valour and self-sacrifice in battle: the devotio of P. Decius Mus.

LIVY VIII.9

[8.9]The battle took place near the base of Mount Vesuvius, where the road led to Veseris. Before leading out their armies to battle the consuls offered sacrifice. The haruspex, whose duty it was to inspect the different organs in the victims, pointed out to Decius a prophetic intimation of his death, in all other respects the signs were favourable. Manlius' sacrifice was entirely satisfactory. "It is well," said Decius, "if my colleague has obtained favourable signs." They moved forward to battle in the formation I have already described, Manlius in command of the right division, Decius of the left. At first both armies fought with equal strength and equal determination. After a time the Roman hastati on the left, unable to withstand the insistency of the Latins, retired behind the principes. During the temporary confusion created by this movement, Decius exclaimed in a loud voice to M. Valerius: "Valerius, we need the help of the gods! Let the Pontifex Maximus dictate to me the words in which I am to devote myself for the legions." The Pontifex bade him veil his head in his toga praetexta, and rest his hand, covered with the toga, against his chin, then standing upon a spear to say these words: "Janus, Jupiter, Father Mars, Quirinus, Bellona, Lares, ye Novensiles and Indigetes, deities to whom belongs the power over us and over our foes, and ye, too, Divine Manes, I pray to you, I do you reverence, I crave your grace and favour that you will bless the Roman People, the Quirites, with power and victory, and visit the enemies of the Roman People, the Quirites, with fear and dread and death. In like manner as I have uttered this prayer so do I now on behalf of the commonwealth of the Quirites, on behalf of the army, the legions, the auxiliaries of the Roman People, the Quirites, devote the legions and auxiliaries of the enemy, together with myself to the Divine Manes and to Earth." After this prayer he ordered the lictors to go to T. Manlius and at once announce to his colleague that he had devoted himself on behalf of the army. He then girded himself with the Gabinian cincture, and in full armour leaped upon his horse and dashed into the middle of the enemy. To those who watched him in both armies, he appeared something awful and superhuman, as though sent from heaven to expiate and appease all the anger of the gods and to avert destruction from his people and bring it on their enemies. All the dread and terror which he carried with him threw the front ranks of the Latins into confusion which soon spread throughout the entire army. This was most evident, for wherever his horse carried him they were paralysed as though struck by some death-dealing star; but when he fell, overwhelmed with darts, the Latin cohorts, in a state of perfect consternation, fled from the spot and left a large space clear. The Romans, on the other hand, freed from all religious fears, pressed forward as though the signal was then first given and commenced a great battle. Even the rorarii rushed forward between the companies of antepilani and added strength to the hastati and principes, whilst the triarii, kneeling on their right knee, waited for the consul's signal to rise

[9] Romani consules, priusquam educerent in aciem, immolauerunt. Decio caput iocineris a familiari parte caesum haruspex dicitur ostendisse: alioqui acceptam dis hostiam esse; Manlium egregie litasse. 'atqui bene habet' inquit Decius, 'si ab collega litatum est.' instructis, sicut ante dictum est, ordinibus processere in aciem; Manlius dextro, Decius laeuo cornu praeerat. primo utrimque aequis uiribus, eodem ardore animorum gerebatur res; deinde ab laeuo cornu hastati Romani, non ferentes impressionem Latinorum, se ad principes recepere. in hac trepidatione Decius consul M. Valerium magna uoce inclamat. 'deorum' inquit, 'ope, M. Valeri, opus est; agedum, pontifex publicus populi Romani, praei uerba quibus me pro legionibus deuoueam.' pontifex eum togam praetextam sumere iussit et uelato capite, manu subter togam ad mentum exserta, super telum subiectum pedibus stantem sic dicere: 'Iane, Iuppiter, Mars pater, Quirine, Bellona, Lares, Diui Nouensiles, Di Indigetes, Diui, quorum est potestas nostrorum hostiumque, Dique Manes, uos precor ueneror, ueniam peto feroque, uti populo Romano Quiritium uim uictoriam prosperetis hostesque populi Romani Quiritium terrore formidine morteque adficiatis. sicut uerbis nuncupaui, ita pro re publica [populi Romani] Quiritium, exercitu, legionibus, auxiliis populi Romani Quiritium, legiones auxiliaque hostium mecum Deis Manibus Tellurique deuoueo.' haec ita precatus lictores ire ad T. Manlium iubet matureque collegae se deuotum pro exercitu nuntiare; ipse incinctus cinctu Gabino, armatus in equum insiluit ac se in medios hostes immisit, conspectus ab utraque acie, aliquanto augustior humano uisu, sicut caelo missus piaculum omnis deorum irae qui pestem ab suis auersam in hostes ferret. ita omnis terror pauorque cum illo latus signa primo Latinorum turbauit, deinde in totam penitus aciem peruasit. euidentissimum id fuit quod, quacumque equo inuectus est, ibi haud secus quam pestifero sidere icti pauebant; ubi uero corruit obrutus telis, inde iam haud dubie consternatae cohortes Latinorum fugam ac uastitatem late fecerunt. simul et Romani exsolutis religione animis, uelut tum primum signo dato coorti pugnam integram ediderunt; nam et rorarii procurrerant inter antepilanos addiderantque uires hastatis ac principibus et triarii genu dextro innixi nutum consulis ad consurgendum exspectabant.

[10] Procedente deinde certamine cum aliis partibus multitudo superaret Latinorum, Manlius consul audito euentu collegae, cum, ut ius fasque erat, lacrimis non minus quam laudibus debitis prosecutus tam memorabilem mortem esset
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75908 From: marcushoratius Date: 2010-05-30
Subject: a. d. III Kalendas Iunonias: Ludi Tarentini
M. Moravius Piscinus Horatianus Quiritibus cultoribus Deorum et omnibus salutem plurimam dicit: Diis bene iuvantibus sitis

Hodie est ante diem III Kalendas Iunonias; haec dies comitialis est: Ludi Tarentini

Following yesterday's sacrifices for the Dea Dia, the Fratres Arvales held horse races in Her honor at their sacred grove outside Rome. They did so on this day in odd-numbered years. In even-numbered years these races were held instead on 20 May.


Portents of rain

"Sheep, however, afford us a similar prognostic (of pending weather) when they skip and frisk about in their clumsy gambol (indecora lascivia); oxen, when they sniff upwards towards the sky and lick themselves against the hair; when the unclean swine tear to pieces the trusses of hay that are put out for other animals; bees, when contrary to their natural habits of industry, keep close to their hives; ants, when they hurry to and fro or are seen carrying forth their eggs, and earthworms emerging from their holes. All these indicate approaching changes in the weather." ~ Pliny Nat. Hist.18.88


AUC 504 / 249 BCE: Origin of the Ludi Tarentini

"When Rome and its countryside were being devastated by a tremendous pestilence, a rich man called Valesius, rustic in his style of life, had two sons and a daughter sick to the despair of the doctors. As he was getting hot water for them from the hearth, he fell on his knees and prayed to his Lares that they transfer the peril of his children onto his own head. A voice then spoke to him, saying that he would have his children safe if he brought them forthwith down the river Tiber to Tarentum and there refreshed them with water from the altar of Dis Pater and Proserpina. He was much perplexed by this predicition, for the voyage prescribed was long and dangerous. However, dubious hope overcoming present fear, he brought the children straightaway to the banks of the Tiber, he living on a farm near a village in the Sabine district called Eretum, and made for Ostia in a boat. In the dead of night he put in at the Campus Martius. The sick children were thirsty, and wishing to succor them, since there was no fire on board, he learned from the skipper that smoke could be seen not far away. The same told him to get out at Tarentum, so the place was called. Eagerly he snatched up a cup and carried water drawn from the river to the place where the smoke had risen, more cheerful now because he thought he had come upon some traces as it were of a divinely offered remedy close at hand. The ground was smoking rather than bearing any remains of fire, so firmly seizing on the omen, he gathered some light fuel as chance supplied it, and blowing on it persistently, elicited a flame, heated the water, and gave it to the children to drink. After doing so, they fell into a healing sleep and were suddenly free from the long protracted violence of the disease. They told their father that in their sleep they saw their bodies sponged all over by one or other of the Gods and directions given that dusky victims should be sacrificed at the altar of Dis Pater and Proserpina, whence the drink had been brought to them, and that spreading of couches and nocturnal games be held. Valesius had seen no altar in that spot, so, thinking it was desired that he should set up one, he went to Rome to buy an altar, leaving men to dig the earth down to a solid floor in order to lay foundations. Following their master's orders, they dug out the soil and reached a depth of twenty feet when they noticed an altar inscribed to Dis Pater and Proserpina. A slave reported this to Valesius, who at the news gave up his intention to buy an altar and sacrificed black victims, which in antiquity were called dusky, at Tarentum, and held games and spreading of couches for three consecutive nights, because his children were freed from danger in the same number. His example was followed by Valerius Publicola, the first Consul, anxious to come to the aid of his fellow countrymen. At the same altar public vows were taken, black oxen were slaughtered male for Dis Pater and female for Proserpina and a spreading of couches and games were held for three nights. Then he covered the altar with earth as it had been before." ~ Valerius Maximus 2.4.5

Festus and Censorius placed the origin of the Ludi Taurii (Tarentini) in the reign of Tarquinius Superbus. The plague especially struck pregnant women, causing the fetus to die in the womb. The sacrifices offered to the Di inferni were therefore sterile cows called taureae. Thus was the origin of the name. The location, Tarentum, was the former name of the Campus Martius, derived from Tarquinius, as in that earlier time the fields belonged to the kings of Rome and were worked by the citizens as a way of paying taxes before the introduction of coinage. The same sources attributed the first celebration of the games during a plague that occurred in the consulship of Valerius Publicola, 504 BCE. They were celebrated again in 249 BCE when Rome was again struck by a plague during the First Punic War, and another time, during the Third Punic War, in 146 BCE. It was from this last celebration of the Ludi Tarentini that the Ludi Saeculares of 17 BCE.

Although the ancient sources place the origin of the games in 504 BCE with Valerius, or earlier with a Valesius (an earlier spelling of Valerius), a more likely origin is with the first historically recorded occurrence in 249 BCE. The cultus for Dis Pater and Proserpina may indeed have begun with the Valerii. But in this year, following a series of disasters, the Sibylline Oracles were consulted on converting this cultus gentilis to sacra publica. Greek forms of rites, and stage performances, were additions made to the earlier sacrifices. The entire form of the ludi publica, as seen with the Ludi Tarentini, are a third century innovation. Historians of that time and later then projected such institutionalized games back to earlier dates. Beginning in 292 BCE crowns were introduced on a Greek model (Livy 10.47.3). The Ludi Tarentini of 249 BCE introduced Greek rites. Processions, as found in the Hellenistic centers, plays, poetry competitions, and hunting exhibitions, all of which came to be associated with ludi publica came in the third century from Greek examples. Prior to the third century ludi consisted of horse races and two-horse chariot races.

The period between when the Ludi Taurii were first held to the second time as Ludi Tarentini suggested a period of a hundred, or a hundred and ten, years between staging these games. Thus in the reign of Augustus were the Ludi Tarentini to become known as the Ludi Saeculares, and as with many other resurrected rituals of the Augustan Restoration, these ludi would have been greatly altered.


Our thought of the day is from Stobaeus 36:

"Pythagoras said, that it was requisite either to be silent, or to say something better than silence."
Our thought for today is from Epicurus, Vatican Sayings 2:

"Death is nothing to us; for that which has been dissolved into its elements experiences no sensations, and that which has no sensation is nothing to us."
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75909 From: marcushoratius Date: 2010-05-30
Subject: Conclusion of the Sessions of the Collegium Pontificum
M. Moravius Horatianus Pontifex Maximus Censoribus, Civibus Novae Romae, Quiritibus, gentilibus Romanis, cultoribus Deorum et omnibus: salutem plurimam dicit.

The Collegium Pontificum having twice met in the month of May has, by a unanimous vote, accepted Vibia Rutilia Enodia and Gaia Maria Caeca into the Camillus Program.

Gratulor, et optimam fortunam vos exopto. Gratias vos agit res publica.

V. Rutilia Enodia, an aeditua of the Temple of Juno shall train to become a sacerdos of Juno. C. Maria Caeca shall be under the instruction of Virgo Maxima Vestalis Maxima Valeria Messallina to become a Vestal Virgin.

Our thanks to both for their willingness to serve the Gods and Nova Roma.

In other matters, one Item on the Collegium's Agenda was tabled to another session, and in an earlier session a matter was referred to the Collegium Augurum.

Attending in the Collegium Pontificum were

Pontifices:

C. Fabius Buteo Modianus, Censor
T. Iulius Sabinus, Censor
Q. Fabius Maximus, Consularius
M. Moravius Piscinus, Consularius
A. Gryllus Graecus, Praetorius
Cn. Cornelius Lentulus
Q. Caecilius Metellus

[Pontifex Fl. Galerius Aurelianus is on leave.]

Virgo Maxima Vestalis M. Valeria Messallina, Tribunus Plebis

Flamines

C. Fabius Buteo Quintilianus, Consul et Censorius
M. Hortensia Maior, Praetrix
C. Petronius Dexter, Tribunus Plebis

Attending the first session and not voting in the second was Flamen Furrinalis M' Titinius Silvanus.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75910 From: Maxima Valeria Messallina Date: 2010-05-30
Subject: Re: Conclusion of the Sessions of the Collegium Pontificum
If I may correct one important thing:
 
Gaia Maria Caeca is adlected Sacerdos Vestalis in addition to being under the training of Maxima Valeria Messallina, Virgo Vestalis Maxima.
 
Congratulations to both Gaia Maria Caeca and Vibia Rutilia Enodiaria and I thank them for their willingness to serve the Religo Romana and our Res publica.
 
Maxima Valeria Messallina
Sacerdos Vestalis
Virgo Maxima
 




<<--- On Sun, 5/30/10, marcushoratius <MHoratius@...> wrote:

M. Moravius Horatianus Pontifex Maximus Censoribus, Civibus Novae Romae, Quiritibus, gentilibus Romanis, cultoribus Deorum et omnibus: salutem plurimam dicit.

The Collegium Pontificum having twice met in the month of May has, by a unanimous vote, accepted Vibia Rutilia Enodia and Gaia Maria Caeca into the Camillus Program.

Gratulor, et optimam fortunam vos exopto. Gratias vos agit res publica.

V. Rutilia Enodia, an aeditua of the Temple of Juno shall train to become a sacerdos of Juno. C. Maria Caeca shall be under the instruction of Virgo Maxima Vestalis Maxima Valeria Messallina to become a Vestal Virgin.

Our thanks to both for their willingness to serve the Gods and Nova Roma.

In other matters, one Item on the Collegium's Agenda was tabled to another session, and in an earlier session a matter was referred to the Collegium Augurum.

Attending in the Collegium Pontificum were

Pontifices:

C. Fabius Buteo Modianus, Censor
T. Iulius Sabinus, Censor
Q. Fabius Maximus, Consularius
M. Moravius Piscinus, Consularius
A. Gryllus Graecus, Praetorius
Cn. Cornelius Lentulus
Q. Caecilius Metellus

[Pontifex Fl. Galerius Aurelianus is on leave.]

Virgo Maxima Vestalis M. Valeria Messallina, Tribuna Plebis

Flamines

C. Fabius Buteo Quintilianus, Consul et Censorius
M. Hortensia Maior, Praetrix
C. Petronius Dexter, Tribunus Plebis

Attending the first session and not voting in the second was Flamen Furrinalis M. Titinius Silvanus.>>




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75911 From: Christer Edling Date: 2010-05-30
Subject: Re: Conclusion of the Sessions of the Collegium Pontificum
Salvete Quirites!

Congratulations to Vibia Rutilia Enodia and Gaia Maria Caeca for the
appointments.

*****

30 maj 2010 kl. 17.29 skrev Maxima Valeria Messallina:


If I may correct one important thing:

Gaia Maria Caeca is adlected Sacerdos Vestalis in addition to being
under the training of Maxima Valeria Messallina, Virgo Vestalis Maxima.

Congratulations to both Gaia Maria Caeca and Vibia Rutilia Enodiaria
and I thank them for their willingness to serve the Religo Romana and
our Res publica.

Maxima Valeria Messallina
Sacerdos Vestalis
Virgo Maxima





<<--- On Sun, 5/30/10, marcushoratius <MHoratius@...> wrote:

M. Moravius Horatianus Pontifex Maximus Censoribus, Civibus Novae
Romae, Quiritibus, gentilibus Romanis, cultoribus Deorum et omnibus:
salutem plurimam dicit.

The Collegium Pontificum having twice met in the month of May has, by
a unanimous vote, accepted Vibia Rutilia Enodia and Gaia Maria Caeca
into the Camillus Program.

Gratulor, et optimam fortunam vos exopto. Gratias vos agit res publica.

V. Rutilia Enodia, an aeditua of the Temple of Juno shall train to
become a sacerdos of Juno. C. Maria Caeca shall be under the
instruction of Virgo Maxima Vestalis Maxima Valeria Messallina to
become a Vestal Virgin.

Our thanks to both for their willingness to serve the Gods and Nova
Roma.

In other matters, one Item on the Collegium's Agenda was tabled to
another session, and in an earlier session a matter was referred to
the Collegium Augurum.

Attending in the Collegium Pontificum were

Pontifices:

C. Fabius Buteo Modianus, Censor
T. Iulius Sabinus, Censor
Q. Fabius Maximus, Consularius
M. Moravius Piscinus, Consularius
A. Gryllus Graecus, Praetorius
Cn. Cornelius Lentulus
Q. Caecilius Metellus

[Pontifex Fl. Galerius Aurelianus is on leave.]

Virgo Maxima Vestalis M. Valeria Messallina, Tribuna Plebis

Flamines

C. Fabius Buteo Quintilianus, Consul et Censorius
M. Hortensia Maior, Praetrix
C. Petronius Dexter, Tribunus Plebis

Attending the first session and not voting in the second was Flamen
Furrinalis M. Titinius Silvanus.>>




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



------------------------------------

Yahoo! Groups Links






*****************
Vale

Caeso Fabius Buteo Quintilianus

Consul Iterum
Princeps Senatus et Flamen Palatualis
Civis Romanus sum
http://www.novaroma.org/nr/Main_Page
************************************************
Aut inveniam viam aut faciam
"I'll either find a way or make one"
************************************************
Dignitas, Iustitia, Fidelitas et Pietas
Dignity, Justice, Loyalty and Dutifulness
************************************************
Mons Palatinus, Clivus Victoriae
Palatine Hill, Incline of Victoriae
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 75912 From: rory12001 Date: 2010-05-30
Subject: Re: Conclusion of the Sessions of the Collegium Pontificum
M. Hortensia quiritibus spd;
this is a wonderful day! Another Vestal in training. All of us in Nova Roma owe all honour to the Virgo Maxima M. Valeria Messallina and now her new priestess, future vestal: G. Maria Caeca!
There is no Rome without her Vestals.
And I know one day we will gather in Vesta's temple

My deep appreciation to V. Rutilia Enodia for her devotion to Juno Regina, who aids us in war. It was Juno dea who sided with the Romans finally against her city Carthage in the Punic war!

di nobis favent!
M. Hortensia Maior

> Congratulations to Vibia Rutilia Enodia and Gaia Maria Caeca for the
> appointments.
>
> *****
>
> 30 maj 2010 kl. 17.29 skrev Maxima Valeria Messallina:
>
>
> If I may correct one important thing:
>
> Gaia Maria Caeca is adlected Sacerdos Vestalis in addition to being
> under the training of Maxima Valeria Messallina, Virgo Vestalis Maxima.
>
> Congratulations to both Gaia Maria Caeca and Vibia Rutilia Enodiaria
> and I thank them for their willingness to serve the Religo Romana and
> our Res publica.
>
> Maxima Valeria Messallina
> Sacerdos Vestalis
> Virgo Maxima
>
>
>
>
>
> <<--- On Sun, 5/30/10, marcushoratius <MHoratius@...> wrote:
>
> M. Moravius Horatianus Pontifex Maximus Censoribus, Civibus Novae
> Romae, Quiritibus, gentilibus Romanis, cultoribus Deorum et omnibus:
> salutem plurimam dicit.
>
> The Collegium Pontificum having twice met in the month of May has, by
> a unanimous vote, accepted Vibia Rutilia Enodia and Gaia Maria Caeca
> into the Camillus Program.
>
> Gratulor, et optimam fortunam vos exopto. Gratias vos agit res publica.
>
> V. Rutilia Enodia, an aeditua of the Temple of Juno shall train to
> become a sacerdos of Juno. C. Maria Caeca shall be under the
> instruction of Virgo Maxima Vestalis Maxima Valeria Messallina to
> become a Vestal Virgin.
>
> Our thanks to both for their willingness to serve the Gods and Nova
> Roma.
>
> In other matters, one Item on the Collegium's Agenda was tabled to
> another session, and in an earlier session a matter was referred to
> the Collegium Augurum.
>
> Attending in the Collegium Pontificum were
>
> Pontifices:
>
> C. Fabius Buteo Modianus, Censor
> T. Iulius Sabinus, Censor
> Q. Fabius Maximus, Consularius
> M. Moravius Piscinus, Consularius
> A. Gryllus Graecus, Praetorius
> Cn. Cornelius Lentulus
> Q. Caecilius Metellus
>
> [Pontifex Fl. Galerius Aurelianus is on leave.]
>
> Virgo Maxima Vestalis M. Valeria Messallina, Tribuna Plebis
>
> Flamines
>
> C. Fabius Buteo Quintilianus, Consul et Censorius
> M. Hortensia Maior, Praetrix
> C. Petronius Dexter, Tribunus Plebis
>
> Attending the first session and not voting in the second was Flamen
> Furrinalis M. Titinius Silvanus.>>
>
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *****************
> Vale
>
> Caeso Fabius Buteo Quintilianus
>
> Consul Iterum
> Princeps Senatus et Flamen Palatualis
> Civis Romanus sum
> http://www.novaroma.org/nr/Main_Page
> ************************************************
> Aut inveniam viam aut faciam
> "I'll either find a way or make one"
> ************************************************
> Dignitas, Iustitia, Fidelitas et Pietas
> Dignity, Justice, Loyalty and Dutifulness
> ************************************************
> Mons Palatinus, Clivus Victoriae
> Palatine Hill, Incline of Victoriae
>