Selected messages in Nova-Roma group. Jul 26-31, 2010

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78777 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2010-07-26
Subject: Re: Claudia Juliana was right
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78778 From: M·CVR·COMPLVTENSIS Date: 2010-07-26
Subject: Re: M. Octavius Gracchus, Welcome
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78779 From: C.Maria Caeca Date: 2010-07-26
Subject: Re: tattoos
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78780 From: marcushoratius Date: 2010-07-26
Subject: Re: Dictatorship
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78781 From: marcushoratius Date: 2010-07-26
Subject: The Comitia Curiata shall Assemble
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78782 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2010-07-26
Subject: Re: Dictatorship
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78783 From: C.Maria Caeca Date: 2010-07-26
Subject: Re: Sententia...
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78784 From: Matt Hucke Date: 2010-07-26
Subject: Re: [BackAlley]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78785 From: Matt Hucke Date: 2010-07-26
Subject: Springtime for Nova Roma
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78786 From: Gaius Tullius Valerianus Date: 2010-07-26
Subject: Re: Felt my words needed their own thread.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78787 From: marcushoratius Date: 2010-07-26
Subject: Re: Call for the Comitia Curiata to Assemble
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78788 From: csentiusleoninus Date: 2010-07-26
Subject: Re: [BackAlley]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78789 From: marcushoratius Date: 2010-07-26
Subject: explorator 13.14 July 25, 2010
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78790 From: marcushoratius Date: 2010-07-26
Subject: Re: Call for the Comitia Curiata to Assemble
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78791 From: Cato Date: 2010-07-26
Subject: Re: The Comitia Curiata shall Assemble
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78792 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2010-07-26
Subject: Re: The Comitia Curiata shall Assemble
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78793 From: Cato Date: 2010-07-26
Subject: Re: [BackAlley]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78794 From: marcushoratius Date: 2010-07-26
Subject: Perspectives
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78795 From: Cato Date: 2010-07-26
Subject: From the Senate House
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78796 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2010-07-26
Subject: Re: Equestria Iunia Laeca
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78797 From: Gaius Petronius Dexter Date: 2010-07-26
Subject: News to the people of Nova Roma.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78798 From: Cato Date: 2010-07-27
Subject: Re: The real call of the tribunes.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78799 From: Matt Hucke Date: 2010-07-27
Subject: Re: [BackAlley]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78800 From: Riku Demyx Date: 2010-07-27
Subject: Re: Sententia...
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78801 From: rory12001 Date: 2010-07-27
Subject: Re: Equestria Iunia Laeca
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78802 From: Riku Demyx Date: 2010-07-27
Subject: Re: Felt my words needed their own thread.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78803 From: Matt Hucke Date: 2010-07-27
Subject: Springtime for Nova Roma
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78804 From: Cato Date: 2010-07-27
Subject: Re: no legal Senate session was called and is still voting
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78805 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2010-07-27
Subject: Re: An Appeal to The Consuls
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78806 From: Timothy or Stephen Gallagher Date: 2010-07-27
Subject: Re: Perspectives
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78807 From: petronius_dexter Date: 2010-07-27
Subject: Re: [BackAlley]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78808 From: marcushoratius Date: 2010-07-27
Subject: a. d. VI Kalendas Sextilias: Profectio ad iter Avernus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78809 From: M·CVR·COMPLVTENSIS Date: 2010-07-27
Subject: Re: [BackAlley]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78810 From: marcushoratius Date: 2010-07-27
Subject: Tattoos spark Latin craze
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78811 From: Kirsteen Wright Date: 2010-07-27
Subject: Re: Equestria Iunia Laeca
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78812 From: Gnaea Livia Ocella Date: 2010-07-27
Subject: Re: Tattoos spark Latin craze
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78813 From: Gnaea Livia Ocella Date: 2010-07-27
Subject: Re: Equestria Iunia Laeca
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78814 From: Gaius Petronius Dexter Date: 2010-07-27
Subject: Re: HAPPY 60TH BIRTHDAY QUINTILIANUS !
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78815 From: Matt Hucke Date: 2010-07-27
Subject: Re: [BackAlley]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78816 From: Matt Hucke Date: 2010-07-27
Subject: Re: News to the people of Nova Roma.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78817 From: M Arminius Maior Date: 2010-07-27
Subject: IT and treasury; was (Re: [Nova-Roma] [BackAlley])
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78818 From: M•IVL•SEVERVS Date: 2010-07-27
Subject: Re: Equestria Iunia Laeca
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78819 From: Gnaeus Iulius Caesar Date: 2010-07-27
Subject: Re: IT and treasury; was (Re: [Nova-Roma] [BackAlley])
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78820 From: Cn. Cornelius Lentulus Date: 2010-07-27
Subject: A little refreshing bit of Roman culture: The "De legibus" on Dictat
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78821 From: M·CVR·COMPLVTENSIS Date: 2010-07-27
Subject: Re: [BackAlley]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78822 From: Matt Hucke Date: 2010-07-27
Subject: Re: IT and treasury; was (Re: [Nova-Roma] [BackAlley])
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78823 From: Matt Hucke Date: 2010-07-27
Subject: Re: IT and treasury; was (Re: [Nova-Roma] [BackAlley])
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78824 From: Gnaeus Iulius Caesar Date: 2010-07-27
Subject: Re: [BackAlley]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78825 From: M·CVR·COMPLVTENSIS Date: 2010-07-27
Subject: Re: [BackAlley]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78826 From: Sabinus Date: 2010-07-27
Subject: Short notice about objections received to the Senate meeting.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78827 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2010-07-27
Subject: Re: [BackAlley]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78828 From: Gnaeus Iulius Caesar Date: 2010-07-27
Subject: Re: [BackAlley]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78829 From: M·CVR·COMPLVTENSIS Date: 2010-07-27
Subject: Re: [BackAlley]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78830 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2010-07-27
Subject: Re: [BackAlley]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78831 From: M·CVR·COMPLVTENSIS Date: 2010-07-27
Subject: Re: [BackAlley]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78832 From: Gnaeus Iulius Caesar Date: 2010-07-27
Subject: Re: [BackAlley]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78833 From: M·CVR·COMPLVTENSIS Date: 2010-07-27
Subject: Re: [BackAlley]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78834 From: petronius_dexter Date: 2010-07-27
Subject: Re: A little refreshing bit of Roman culture: The "De legibus" on Di
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78835 From: M·CVR·COMPLVTENSIS Date: 2010-07-27
Subject: Re: [BackAlley]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78836 From: Gnaeus Iulius Caesar Date: 2010-07-27
Subject: Re: [BackAlley]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78837 From: gualterus_graecus Date: 2010-07-27
Subject: Re: [BackAlley]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78838 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2010-07-27
Subject: Re: [BackAlley]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78839 From: M·CVR·COMPLVTENSIS Date: 2010-07-27
Subject: Re:
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78840 From: Matt Hucke Date: 2010-07-27
Subject: Re: IT and Treasury
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78841 From: Cato Date: 2010-07-27
Subject: Re: [BackAlley]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78842 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2010-07-27
Subject: Re: [BackAlley]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78843 From: Gnaeus Iulius Caesar Date: 2010-07-27
Subject: Re: [BackAlley]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78844 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2010-07-27
Subject: Re: [BackAlley]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78845 From: M·CVR·COMPLVTENSIS Date: 2010-07-27
Subject: Re: [BackAlley]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78846 From: M·CVR·COMPLVTENSIS Date: 2010-07-27
Subject: Re: [BackAlley]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78847 From: M·CVR·COMPLVTENSIS Date: 2010-07-27
Subject: Re:
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78848 From: Cato Date: 2010-07-27
Subject: Re: [BackAlley]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78849 From: Cato Date: 2010-07-27
Subject: Re:
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78850 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2010-07-27
Subject: Re:
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78851 From: Gnaeus Iulius Caesar Date: 2010-07-27
Subject: Re:
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78852 From: gualterus_graecus Date: 2010-07-27
Subject: Re:
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78853 From: D.O.A. Date: 2010-07-27
Subject: Re: IT and Treasury
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78854 From: petronius_dexter Date: 2010-07-27
Subject: Re: Short notice about objections received to the Senate meeting.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78855 From: iulius sabinus Date: 2010-07-27
Subject: Re: Short notice about objections received to the Senate meeting.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78856 From: Bruno Zani Date: 2010-07-27
Subject: A little refreshing bit of Roman culture: The "De legibus" on Dictat
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78857 From: marcushoratius Date: 2010-07-27
Subject: OBNUNTIATIO: ALIO DIE
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78858 From: M·CVR·COMPLVTENSIS Date: 2010-07-27
Subject: Re: A little refreshing bit of Roman culture: The "De legibus" on Di
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78859 From: M·CVR·COMPLVTENSIS Date: 2010-07-27
Subject: Re: IT and Treasury
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78860 From: Publius Memmius Albucius Date: 2010-07-27
Subject: Responsum consulare de OBNUNTIATIOne
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78861 From: Matt Hucke Date: 2010-07-27
Subject: Re: OBNUNTIATIO: ALIO DIE
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78862 From: gualterus_graecus Date: 2010-07-27
Subject: Re: OBNUNTIATIO: ALIO DIE
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78863 From: gualterus_graecus Date: 2010-07-27
Subject: Re: Responsum consulare de OBNUNTIATIOne
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78864 From: deciusiunius Date: 2010-07-28
Subject: Against a dictatorship
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78865 From: Gaius Tullius Valerianus Date: 2010-07-28
Subject: In Dictātūram (Against Dictatorship)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78866 From: marcushoratius Date: 2010-07-28
Subject: a. d. V Kalendas Sextilias: The Battle of Mt. Gaurus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78867 From: marcushoratius Date: 2010-07-28
Subject: Re: OBNUNTIATIO: ALIO DIE
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78868 From: C.Antonivs Date: 2010-07-28
Subject: Re: Formation of Oppidum Urbs Nova, Provincia Sarmatia - Edict 3
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78869 From: marcushoratius Date: 2010-07-28
Subject: Responsum Auguris de OBNUNTIATIONE
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78870 From: Publius Ullerius Stephanus Venator Date: 2010-07-28
Subject: Re: Against a dictatorship
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78871 From: gualterus_graecus Date: 2010-07-28
Subject: Re: OBNUNTIATIO: ALIO DIE
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78872 From: Cato Date: 2010-07-28
Subject: Re: OBNUNTIATIO: ALIO DIE
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78873 From: Robert Date: 2010-07-28
Subject: Re: [BackAlley] Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: OBNUNTIATIO: ALIO DIE
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78874 From: Matt Hucke Date: 2010-07-28
Subject: Re: Responsum Auguris de OBNUNTIATIONE
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78875 From: Matt Hucke Date: 2010-07-28
Subject: Re: OBNUNTIATIO: ALIO DIE
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78876 From: C. Curius Saturninus Date: 2010-07-28
Subject: family-trees of late republican nobility
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78877 From: gualterus_graecus Date: 2010-07-28
Subject: Re: OBNUNTIATIO: ALIO DIE
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78878 From: Timothy or Stephen Gallagher Date: 2010-07-28
Subject: Proposed dictatorship, No
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78879 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2010-07-28
Subject: Latin class registration--again
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78880 From: Riku Demyx Date: 2010-07-28
Subject: Re: family-trees of late republican nobility
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78881 From: rory12001 Date: 2010-07-28
Subject: Re: family-trees of late republican nobility
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78882 From: Gnaea Livia Ocella Date: 2010-07-28
Subject: Re: family-trees of late republican nobility
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78883 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2010-07-28
Subject: Re: family-trees of late republican nobility
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78884 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2010-07-28
Subject: Re: A little refreshing bit of Roman culture: The "De legibus" on Di
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78885 From: flavius_vedius Date: 2010-07-28
Subject: Re: Against a dictatorship
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78886 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2010-07-29
Subject: Re: family-trees of late republican nobility
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78887 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2010-07-29
Subject: Re: family-trees of late republican nobility
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78888 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2010-07-29
Subject: Re: family-trees of late republican nobility
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78889 From: rory12001 Date: 2010-07-29
Subject: Re: family-trees of late republican nobility
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78890 From: Gaius Tullius Valerianus Date: 2010-07-29
Subject: Re: family-trees of late republican nobility
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78891 From: Belle Morte Date: 2010-07-29
Subject: Re: family-trees of late republican nobility
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78892 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2010-07-29
Subject: Re: family-trees of late republican nobility
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78893 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2010-07-29
Subject: Re: family-trees of late republican nobility
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78894 From: marcushoratius Date: 2010-07-29
Subject: a. d. IV Kalendas Sextilias: The Last Days of Carthage
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78895 From: marcushoratius Date: 2010-07-29
Subject: ANNOUNCEMENT: Confarreationes in August
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78896 From: Maxima Valeria Messallina Date: 2010-07-29
Subject: Test Post
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78897 From: marcushoratius Date: 2010-07-29
Subject: The Collegium Pontificum is Called into Session
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78898 From: L. Livia Plauta Date: 2010-07-29
Subject: Re: IT and treasury; was (Re: [Nova-Roma] [BackAlley])
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78899 From: rory12001 Date: 2010-07-29
Subject: Re: ANNOUNCEMENT: Confarreationes in August
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78900 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2010-07-30
Subject: Re: [NRComitiaCuriata] Comitia Curiata is Now Assembled
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78901 From: Gaius Tullius Valerianus Date: 2010-07-30
Subject: answering the call for the Comitia Curiata
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78902 From: Timothy or Stephen Gallagher Date: 2010-07-30
Subject: Dictatorship
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78903 From: Timothy or Stephen Gallagher Date: 2010-07-30
Subject: Tribunician report of the VETOED Senate Should read as follows
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78904 From: Cato Date: 2010-07-30
Subject: Re: Tribunician report of the VETOED Senate Should read as follows
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78905 From: Cato Date: 2010-07-30
Subject: Re: [NRComitiaCuriata] Comitia Curiata is Now Assembled
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78906 From: Publius Memmius Albucius Date: 2010-07-30
Subject: Re: [SenatusRomanus] Tribunician report for July session of the Sena
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78907 From: marcushoratius Date: 2010-07-30
Subject: a. d. III Kalendas Sextilias: Battle of Vercellae and Fortuna Huiusc
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78908 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2010-07-30
Subject: Re: [NRComitiaCuriata] Comitia Curiata is Now Assembled
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78909 From: marcushoratius Date: 2010-07-30
Subject: Re: [NRComitiaCuriata] Comitia Curiata is Now Assembled
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78910 From: Maxima Valeria Messallina Date: 2010-07-30
Subject: Re: Claudia Juliana was right
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78911 From: Maxima Valeria Messallina Date: 2010-07-30
Subject: Re: Claudia Juliana was right
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78912 From: Matt Hucke Date: 2010-07-30
Subject: Re: Claudia Juliana was right
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78913 From: Publius Memmius Albucius Date: 2010-07-30
Subject: Re: Resignation as Diribitor
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78914 From: Maxima Valeria Messallina Date: 2010-07-30
Subject: Re: Claudia Juliana was right
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78915 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2010-07-30
Subject: Re: [NRComitiaCuriata] Comitia Curiata is Now Assembled
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78916 From: Maxima Valeria Messallina Date: 2010-07-30
Subject: Re: Claudia Juliana was right
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78917 From: Gaius Petronius Dexter Date: 2010-07-30
Subject: Today Senate is called to vote.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78918 From: Nero Date: 2010-07-30
Subject: Gay marriage in NR
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78919 From: Gaius Petronius Dexter Date: 2010-07-30
Subject: Datation question...
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78920 From: Matt Hucke Date: 2010-07-30
Subject: Re: Claudia Juliana was right
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78921 From: Gaius Tullius Valerianus Date: 2010-07-30
Subject: Re: [NRComitiaCuriata] Re: answering the call for the Comitia Curiat
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78922 From: Matt Hucke Date: 2010-07-30
Subject: Re: [NRComitiaCuriata] Comitia Curiata is Now Assembled
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78923 From: Gnaea Livia Ocella Date: 2010-07-30
Subject: Re: Gay marriage in NR
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78924 From: Belle Morte Date: 2010-07-30
Subject: Official Name Change
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78925 From: Gaius Tullius Valerianus Date: 2010-07-30
Subject: Re: Datation question...
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78926 From: L. Livia Plauta Date: 2010-07-30
Subject: Re: [NRComitiaCuriata] Comitia Curiata is Now Assembled
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78927 From: L. Livia Plauta Date: 2010-07-30
Subject: Witness Statement from L. Livia Plauta
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78929 From: rory12001 Date: 2010-07-30
Subject: Re: Gay marriage in NR
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78930 From: Cato Date: 2010-07-30
Subject: Re: Witness Statement from L. Livia Plauta
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78931 From: Cato Date: 2010-07-30
Subject: Re: Official Name Change
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78932 From: Cato Date: 2010-07-30
Subject: Re: [NRComitiaCuriata] Comitia Curiata is Now Assembled
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78933 From: Cato Date: 2010-07-30
Subject: Re: Gay marriage in NR
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78934 From: Belle Morte Date: 2010-07-30
Subject: Re: Official Name Change
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78935 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2010-07-30
Subject: On the Dictatorship
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78936 From: Cato Date: 2010-07-30
Subject: Re: Claudia Juliana was right
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78937 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2010-07-30
Subject: Re: Witness Statement from L. Livia Plauta
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78938 From: Gaius Tullius Valerianus Date: 2010-07-30
Subject: Re: Witness Statement from L. Livia Plauta
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78939 From: Cato Date: 2010-07-30
Subject: On Dictatorship
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78940 From: Christina Moseley Date: 2010-07-30
Subject: Re: Official Name Change
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78941 From: Christina Moseley Date: 2010-07-30
Subject: Re: Gay marriage in NR
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78942 From: rory12001 Date: 2010-07-30
Subject: Re: Gay marriage in NR
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78943 From: Belle Morte Statia Date: 2010-07-31
Subject: Re: Official Name Change
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78944 From: Susan Date: 2010-07-31
Subject: Re: On Dictatorship
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78945 From: petronius_dexter Date: 2010-07-31
Subject: Re: On Dictatorship
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78946 From: Susan Date: 2010-07-31
Subject: Re: On Dictatorship
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78947 From: Susan Date: 2010-07-31
Subject: Re: On Dictatorship
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78948 From: petronius_dexter Date: 2010-07-31
Subject: Re: On Dictatorship
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78949 From: petronius_dexter Date: 2010-07-31
Subject: Re: Gay marriage in NR
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78950 From: Cato Date: 2010-07-31
Subject: Re: On Dictatorship
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78951 From: Gaius Tullius Valerianus Date: 2010-07-31
Subject: Re: Official Name Change
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78952 From: Riku Demyx Date: 2010-07-31
Subject: Re: Gay marriage in NR
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78953 From: petronius_dexter Date: 2010-07-31
Subject: Re: Gay marriage in NR



Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78777 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2010-07-26
Subject: Re: Claudia Juliana was right
For what it's worth Dexter, you have done an exemplary job.

Respectfully,

Sulla

On Sun, Jul 25, 2010 at 7:19 AM, petronius_dexter <jfarnoud94@...>wrote:

>
>
> C. Petronius T. Sabino s.p.d.,
>
>
> > A fine analysis from a fine person! That is what I consider an elegant
> debate and a model for what we, the new Romans, must follow when it comes
> about posting on this list.
>
> Thank you very much. I think that a debate, even and mostly with ideas in
> opposition, must stay on the level of the courtesy. Only the arguments have
> weight.
>
> I decided with myself to follow this way of debatting, searching to
> convince with fine analysis and honest arguments without attacks ad hominem
> neither punchs below the belt.
>
> May Gods make me keep cool, fair play and self control in every debate.
>
> Vale.
>
>
> C. Petronius Dexter
> tribunus Plebis Arcoiali scribebat
> a. d. VIII Kalendas Sextiles P. Memmio K. Fabio II coss.
>
>
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78778 From: M·CVR·COMPLVTENSIS Date: 2010-07-26
Subject: Re: M. Octavius Gracchus, Welcome
Good planning. Have you thought of your own? If so congrats!


M�CVRIATIVS�COMPLVTENSIS
PROCONSVL HISPANIAE

NOVA ROMA

-------------------------------------------

ex paucis multa, ex minimis maxima


2010/7/26 Gnaeus Iulius Caesar <gn_iulius_caesar@...>

>
>
> Caesar Catoni sal.
>
> Well amice indeed. Quite the pattern developing.
>
> 2009 = sockpuppet to "defend" the respublica.
> 2010 = dictator to "defend" the respublica.
> 2011 = princeps to "defend" the respublica?
> 2012 = imperator to "defend" the respublica?
> 2013 = ??? What possible pointy hat and imposing title could be left in the
> closet?
>
> Optime vale
>
> --- On Mon, 7/26/10, Cato <catoinnyc@... <catoinnyc%40gmail.com>>
> wrote:
>
> > From: Cato <catoinnyc@... <catoinnyc%40gmail.com>>
> > Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: M. Octavius Gracchus, Welcome
> > To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com <Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com>
> > Date: Monday, July 26, 2010, 10:44 AM
>
> > Cato Iulio Caesari sal.
> >
> > Well, to be honest we all *knew* it was him, but no-one
> > bothered to really investigate it because...well, because he
> > was only being mean to *us*, the ones perceived as "easy
> > targets", which automatically justified anything he did or
> > said.
>
>
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78779 From: C.Maria Caeca Date: 2010-07-26
Subject: Re: tattoos
C. Maria Caeca C. Petronio Dextero Tribunis Plebis S. P. D.

Well ...so long as the chains are *pretty*, I suppose ...no, on 2nd thought, the only chains I will wear, of my own free will, are the kind made out of 14K gold that I put on and take off again, if, and when, I please, thank you all the same, though!

Vale quam optime,
Maria Caeca

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78780 From: marcushoratius Date: 2010-07-26
Subject: Re: Dictatorship
Salve Tiberi

Rewriting history? The historical Sulla usurped a dictatorship and massacred hundreds of the senate in the process. The Republic died because he overthrew the Republic in a coup.

And our little sulla can throw his tantrums, jump up and down, stomp his feet, and hold his breath, but it does not change the facts. A legitimate meeting of the Board of Directors was held and acts were agreed upon by a majority of the Board. That's the law. Read the State of Maine Revised Satutes on Maine Non-Profit Corporations Act. You are in a state of denial. I, however, have no doubts on where the law stands.

Vale
Piscinus


--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Timothy or Stephen Gallagher <spqr753@...> wrote:
>
>
>
> Salvete Romans,
>
>
>
> When the Romans needed a dictator Hannibal or ones like him were at the gates. The original Sulla was made dictator to rewrite the Roman constitution and the republic was dead in less than fifty years.
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78781 From: marcushoratius Date: 2010-07-26
Subject: The Comitia Curiata shall Assemble
Salve Tiberi Galeri

Apparently my posts are being delayed, although I don't why they are not appearing on the list. Since my earlier response hasn't appeared, I shall repeat it.

The Constitution IV.A.2.d states that a consul has the power "To pronounce intercessio (intercession; a veto) against another consul or magistrate of lesser authority.

However, the Constitution also states, at IV.A.9: "Apparitores (Attendants). Collectively, the apparitores shall not be considered magistrates, but rather shall be appointed into various decuriae (corporations) to fulfill those necessary functions as shall be assigned to them by law enacted by one of the comitia. They shall include the lictores, lictores curiati, scribae, and accensi."

Further, the Comitia Curiata, under the Constitution III.A "shall be called to order by the Pontifex Maximus."

Neither the Pontifex Maximus nor the lictores curiati are magistrates, and thus they are not magistrates of lesser authority. A consul has no constitutional power to veto their actions or the Comitia Curiata from assembling.

Vale

M. Moravius Piscinus
Pontifex Maximus




--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Timothy or Stephen Gallagher <spqr753@...> wrote:
>
>
>
> Salve Consul Albicius,
>
> As a Senator of the republic, I also request that you veto this Comitia summons which seeks to enact an illegal appointment of an illegal meeting of the Senate of Nova Roma. The one you vetoed from meeting.
>
>
>
> As a Plebeian citizen I also ask that any Tribune, who wish to recover their honor, to do likewise.
>
>
>
> Vale
>
>
>
> Ti. Galerius Paulinus
>
>
> "His hope was to remind the world that fairness, justice, and freedom are more than words, they are perspectives."
>
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78782 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2010-07-26
Subject: Re: Dictatorship
I think you are confusing me with yourself again. Please be more careful
about that next time, it will be the third time you have done that.

Vale,

Sulla

On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 4:25 PM, marcushoratius <MHoratius@...>wrote:

>
>
> Salve Tiberi
>
> Rewriting history? The historical Sulla usurped a dictatorship and
> massacred hundreds of the senate in the process. The Republic died because
> he overthrew the Republic in a coup.
>
> And our little sulla can throw his tantrums, jump up and down, stomp his
> feet, and hold his breath, but it does not change the facts. A legitimate
> meeting of the Board of Directors was held and acts were agreed upon by a
> majority of the Board. That's the law. Read the State of Maine Revised
> Satutes on Maine Non-Profit Corporations Act. You are in a state of denial.
> I, however, have no doubts on where the law stands.
>
> Vale
> Piscinus
>
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com <Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com>, Timothy or
> Stephen Gallagher <spqr753@...> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > Salvete Romans,
> >
> >
> >
> > When the Romans needed a dictator Hannibal or ones like him were at the
> gates. The original Sulla was made dictator to rewrite the Roman
> constitution and the republic was dead in less than fifty years.
> >
>
>
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78783 From: C.Maria Caeca Date: 2010-07-26
Subject: Re: Sententia...
C. Maria Caeca Livia Ocella S. P. D.

Excellent post, Livia Amica! I am always delighted and encouraged when I see new citizens offer well thought out and well written comments, here ...because, you know, one day, it is the now new citizens who will hold the torch ...and conduct the business of the Res Publica ...and it is obvious, at least to me, that you are using this critical and terrible time in our evolution to learn as much as you can ...and, believe it or not, you will learn more about the workings of the Republic in times like this than you would when things are going smoothly.

Cura ut valeas,
C. Maria Caeca

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78784 From: Matt Hucke Date: 2010-07-26
Subject: Re: [BackAlley]
M·CVR·COMPLVTENSIS wrote:

> Matt, ex-Octavius,

Mr. David-Lloyd Pais Alonso,

my name is STILL Octavius, and it will be whenever I interact with any Roman
community, in spite of any efforts to make me an "unperson" by those who
deliberately choose not to use it.

Having read said lex, the requirements it imposes are trivial - so yes,
barring malfeasesance and obstructionism by censores, I can indeed "return at
any time".

And winged simians might then fly from my nether orifice, as a great Chicago
philosopher once said.

Vale,
M. Octavius Gracchus,
Consular and Proud Peregrinus.

--
Matt Hucke (hucke@...), programmer.
Graveyards of Illinois - http://graveyards.com/
"Time is an illusion. Lunchtime, doubly so." - D. Adams
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78785 From: Matt Hucke Date: 2010-07-26
Subject: Springtime for Nova Roma
CHORUS:
Nova Roma's in decline,
What a sad, sad story!
Needs a new dictator to restore
Its former glory.
Where, oh, where is he?
Where could that man be?
We faked a crisis, then we "found"
The man for you and me.

LEAD TENOR SENATOR:
And now it's...
Springtime for Roma and Marinus.
Write the proscriptions to-day.
He's going to do "real" things for us.
Look out, here comes Great Marinus!

Springtime for Maior and Piscinus.
Winter for Consul from France.
Springtime for Caeso and Curius.
Come on, Romans, go into your dance!

SENATOR "ROLF":
I'm a consul in frozen Thule and that is why I'm a useful tool.

SENATOR "MEL":
Don't be stupid, be a smarty, now we'll crush the Boni party!

CHORUS AND SENATOR:
Springtime for Augurs ueber alles!
Tribunes do goose-steps, today.
Eagles fall from the skies again.
Roma is is on the rise again!

Springtime for Modianus Semper Censor!
Notas for everyone once more!
Winter for Sulla and Cato!
Watch out, BackAlley,
We're going on tour!

VESTAL:
The Dictator is coming, the Dictator is coming, the Dictator is coming!

SENATOR #1:
Ave Marinus!
SENATOR #2:
Ave Marinus!
LEAD TENOR SENATOR:
Ave Marinus!
Springtime for Roma and Marinus!
ALL:
Ave Marinus!

CHORUS:
Our numbers are in decline again.
But Roma is on the rise again.

Springtime for Caeso and Piscinus!
Vestals are virgins once more!
Springtime for Augur and Pontifex!

Means that...
Soon we'll be going...
We've got to be going...
You know we'll be going....
You bet we'll be going...
You know we'll be going to war!!


--
Matt Hucke (hucke@...), programmer.
Graveyards of Illinois - http://graveyards.com/
"Time is an illusion. Lunchtime, doubly so." - D. Adams
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78786 From: Gaius Tullius Valerianus Date: 2010-07-26
Subject: Re: Felt my words needed their own thread.
Gaius Tullius Valerianus Gaio Iunio Neroni S.P.D.

Salve! I appreciate what you're trying to do and say - I really do -
but I don't know if you fully grasp the seriousness of what is happening
right now. You wrote:
*People flaunt what they think to be big issues for days and days *
*taking up countless messages of...forgive me, prattle and blathering. *
Right now an illegally held Senate meeting has decided to appoint an
illegal dictator, and a dictator is something Nova Roma has only had once
before (in 1999). And then, by all accounts, things were not so bad as now
(I became a citizen in 2000). We have magistrates and even priests acting in
illegal and immoral ways, and refusing to acknowledge this or mend their
ways. We have accusations of impropriety in financial dealings for new IT
infrastructure (to the tune of $10,000+ US), which is serious in and of
itself, and wouldn't even be necessary (as the honored Octavius Gracchus
points out) had certain people not behaved badly. Nova Roma is a non-profit
organization incorporated in the state of Maine, USA, and now Nova Roma may
be in violation of Maine law - its very legal existence is threatened. So
"what they think to be big issues" really are, in some cases, big issues. I
can attest that many involved in this whole thing on both sides would *rather
*be doing something productive, but the current situation doesn't allow for
it - one doesn't sit about reading Vergil's account of the burning of Troy
while one's own house is on fire and burning down around one.
Now, there are people here who like to prattle and blather. Some would
admit to it, some would not. A lot of it usually goes to other lists - like
the Back Alley, which allows blathering, if one is so inclined. But I don't
think anyone is doing either right now.

You also wrote:
* We can tell someone off for wanting a tattoo "because the romans did not
hold with such" but then look at us? Would the Romans act this way? If we
traveled back and told Cicero we are what remains of the republic, he would
drop to the ground laughing. *
* Now, it does seem to be a fact that the Romans (and Indo-European
cultures in general) did not approve of tattooing, seeing it as servile
self-mutilation and perhaps even unclean, and the scholars among us are
right to point this out to those inquiring about tattooing practices. We
are, of course, NOVA Romans, not ancient Romans, and many of us do have
tattoos (I am not among the tattooed, however). It's up to us whether we
want to have them or not. Let us at least hope that we avoid tattoos in
botched Latin that are so common!*
* But as to your question of "Would the Romans act this way?" Ummm . . .
have you ever studied the Romans? Of course they did - sadly. All too often,
in fact. It is indeed sad to see how bad things have gotten lately around
here - but they're not going to get better on their own. Ironically, you
quote Cicero's words denouncing Catiline, a moment of great crisis in the
old Republic. Would you have had Cicero remain silent, and Catiline's mad
schemes succeed. Nor can we of good conscience remain silent when we see our
beloved Republic threatened, Nero. If you don't want to know about the
struggles tearing apart our Republic, hit the "delete" key. There were
plenty of Romans who decided to stay home and not inquire as to what
Catiline was up to, too. But of course, I would rather you - and all good
citizens with a conscience - would get involved. *
* You have a voice here, Nero. It's up to you how you use it.*

**You also wrote:

> * Even now when people read my response I'm 9/10ths of the people will
> have
> something negative to say, and it will lead to more fighting.*
>
I hope you don't interpret my words as negative. They are not meant to
be, certainly. I'm just trying to offer you some perspective.
You said:

> * Let's not just call ourselves Roman but remember what it is to be Roman
> and actually BE Romans*
>
which is a nice sentiment, but being Roman to many of us *means *not
standing by and letting our elected representatives and priests behave badly
and illegally. It means exactly the opposite of standing by and letting that
sort of thing go unchecked.

You wrote:

> * Let's make ourselves proud to come from Cato, Cicero, Caesar, and
> Brutus.
> I mean come on people, WE ARE ROME, our ancestors built the everlasting
> monuments and concepts that shaped modern civilization, we were a golden
> age, we
> were a perfect age.
> WE ARE ROME*
>
Inspiring words, Nero. Many of us on both sides of the current conflict are
here because of our conviction that Rome offered the world something better,
and we are here to offer it again. I would personally disagree with the
"perfect age" bit - there is some irony in mentioning Cato, Cicero, Caesar,
and Brutus in the same breath (Caesar seemed to threaten the existence of
the Republic, so Brutus decided to betray and murder him, but not before
Cato had killed himself rather than surrender to Caesar. About a year later,
Cicero (who often said he had wished that he had been in on the plot to kill
Caesar) had his head and hands cut off on the orders of Mark Antony with the
agreement of Octavian, the heir of Caesar. The people you mention betrayed
and killed each other and themselves. Hardly "perfect." But still
important.

Vale, Nero!


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78787 From: marcushoratius Date: 2010-07-26
Subject: Re: Call for the Comitia Curiata to Assemble
M. Moravius Pontifex Maximus L Cornelio Senatori et Lictori dicit:

A consul only has the power of intercessio under certain conditions. The Constituion IV.A.2.c states that a consul has the power: "To pronounce intercessio (intercession; a veto) against another consul or magistrate of lesser authority."

However, neither the Pontifex Maximus nor any lictores curiati are magistrates. Constitution IV.A.9: "Apparitores (Attendants). Collectively, the apparitores shall not be considered magistrates, but rather shall be appointed into various decuriae (corporations) to fulfill those necessary functions as shall be assigned to them by law enacted by one of the comitia. They shall include the lictores, lictores curiati, scribae, and accensi."

Not magistrates, therefore not magistrates of lesser authority, therefore the consul has no constitutional power to veto the assembly of the Comitia Curiata.




--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Robert Woolwine <robert.woolwine@...> wrote:
>
> Consul Albicius,
>
> As a Lictor of Nova Roma, I humbly request that you veto this Comitia
> summons which seeks to legitimize an illegal summons of the Senate of Nova
> Roma.
>
> Respectfully,
>
> Lucius Cornelius Sulla Felix
> Lictor - appointed by Flavius Vedius Germanicus
>
> On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 3:06 PM, marcushoratius <MHoratius@...>wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > M. Moravius Piscinus Pontifex Maximus Lictoribus omnibus s. p. d.
> >
> > All Lictores curiati of Nova Roma are to assemble for the Comitia Curiata
> > beginning at 00.00 hours CET Roma (18.00 hrs EST) on IV Kal. Sext. (29 July)
> > in order to invest Gnaeus Equitius Marinus, Censoirus et Magister Populi
> > designatus, with imperium for the office of dictator.
> >
> > QUOD BONUM FAUSTVM FELIX FORTUNATUMQVE SIT POPULO NOVO ROMANO QUIRITIBUS
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78788 From: csentiusleoninus Date: 2010-07-26
Subject: Re: [BackAlley]
And perhaps you should indicate that you are 2 citizens.



--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, M·CVR·COMPLVTENSIS <complutensis@...> wrote:
>
> To avoid confusions he should indicate that he is an ex-citizen.
>
> M·CVRIATIVS·COMPLVTENSIS
> PROCONSVL HISPANIAE
>
> NOVA ROMA
>
> -------------------------------------------
>
> ex paucis multa, ex minimis maxima
>
>
> 2010/7/25 Q. Caecilius Metellus <q.caecilius.metellus@...>
>
> >
> >
> > Metellus Plautae sal.
> >
> >
> > > Salve Matt,
> > > you renounced citizenship in NR on 2009-06-07. I'm not sure you are
> > entitled
> > > to use the name of M. Octavius Gracchus.
> >
> > It's positions like this that add to the perception that Nova Roma is a
> > role playing game. If, when one ceases to be a citizen, they are no
> > longer who they are here, then we really are just playing roles.
> >
> >
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78789 From: marcushoratius Date: 2010-07-26
Subject: explorator 13.14 July 25, 2010
================================================================
explorator 13.14 July 25, 2010
================================================================
Editor's note: Most urls should be active for at least eight
hours from the time of publication.

For your computer's protection, Explorator is sent in plain text
and NEVER has attachments. Be suspicious of any Explorator which
arrives otherwise!!!
================================================================
================================================================
Thanks to Arthur Shippee, Dave Sowdon,David Critchley,Diana Wright,
Donna Hurst, Edward Rockstein, Joan Griffith, Rick Heli,
John Hall, Kris Curry, Kurt Theis,John McMahon, Barnea Selavan,
Joseph Lauer,Mike Ruggeri, George Somsel, Joos Postma,
Bob Heuman, Sophie Cabot,Rochelle Altman,Curtis B. Edmundson
and Ross W. Sargent for headses upses this week (as always
hoping I have left no one out).
================================================================
EARLY HUMANS
================================================================
Feature on 'a little bit of Neanderthal in all of us' (video/news):

http://www.france24.com/en/20100723-2010-neanderthal-homo-sapiens-genome-cro-mag\
non-common-ancestors

Not really sure what is 'new' about this hypothesis for human evolution:

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2010/07/100720123639.htm
http://www.physorg.com/news198857237.html

Blaming early mammoth hunters for global warming (again):

http://www.thebristolbaytimes.com/article/1029did_mammoth_hunters_warm_the_world
http://www.adn.com/2010/07/24/1380065/did-mammoth-hunters-of-long-ago.html

I guess this one goes here ... from Israel comes the oldest 'steak knives':

http://www.aolnews.com/world/article/researchers-in-israel-find-worlds-first-ste\
ak-knives/19563689

Analyzing how ancient humans walked:

http://news.discovery.com/archaeology/footprint-fossils-analyzed-for-ancient-hum\
an-gait.html

More on humans in Britain some 800 000 years b.p.:

http://www.usyd.edu.au/news/84.html?newsstoryid=5291

More on the monkey/ape split:

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/07/20/science/20obmonkey.html

================================================================
ANCIENT NEAR EAST AND EGYPT
================================================================
A 6000 b.p. statue from Jordan:

http://www.jordantimes.com/?news=28517

Archaeologists have started exploring the depths of Lake Qarun:

http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20100721/wl_africa_afp/egyptarchaeology_201007211647\
42
http://www.physorg.com/news198938142.html

An update (more or less) on the Seti tunnel excavation:

http://weekly.ahram.org.eg/2010/1008/he2.htm


The Ottawa Citizen has a nice series on the dig at Tel Tayinat and recent
discoveries:

http://www.ottawacitizen.com/technology/mice+ancient/3306876/story.html
http://www.ottawacitizen.com/technology/Canadian+archeologists+discover+Testamen\
t+tablet/2775502/story.html
http://www.ottawacitizen.com/technology/Ancient+tablet+bears+scars+dark+history/\
3317323/story.html
http://www.ottawacitizen.com/technology/Unearthing+forgotten+kingdom/3290289/sto\
ry.html

Feature on the Megiddo Expedition:

http://www.jpost.com/LocalIsrael/AroundIsrael/Article.aspx?id=181536

Bronze Age burials from Tal Om al-Mara:

http://www.english.globalarabnetwork.com/201007236645/Related-news-from-Syria/ar\
chaeological-tombs-dating-back-to-bronze-age-discovered-in-northern-syria.html

Feature on the Bronze Age (mostly) site of Tell Fadous-Kfarabida:

http://www.dailystar.com.lb/article.asp?edition_id=10&categ_id=4&article_id=1171\
22#axzz0u5DeknEd

Interesting finds from Petra:

http://heritage-key.com/blogs/owenjarus/ancient-city-petra-tombs-reveal-61-buria\
ls-and-islamic-gold-medallion

A fifth century synagogue from Horvat Kur:

http://www.helsinki.fi/news/archive/7-2010/21-12-46-17.html
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2010/07/100707080941.htm
A student digger's experience at Ashkelon:

http://www.pioneerlocal.com/libertyville/news/2511854,libertyville-israeldig-072\
210-s1.article

Digging has resumed at Soloi Pompeiopolis:

http://www.balkantravellers.com/en/read/article/2140

A fifth-century monastery find from Syria:

http://www.english.globalarabnetwork.com/201007226640/Related-news-from-Syria/ar\
chaeologists-5th-century-monastery-unearthed-in-syria.html

Feature on the Crown of Aleppo:

http://www.jewishjournal.com/twelve_twelve/article/the_other_bible_the_crown_of_\
aleppo_20100721/

More on DSS parchment being made 'locally':

http://www.newkerala.com/news2/fullnews-4528.html
http://news.discovery.com/archaeology/dead-sea-scrolls-protons.html
More on Carter/Tut online:

http://www.guardian.co.uk/culture/2010/jul/18/tutankhamun-website-howard-carter-\
tomb
Egyptology News Blog:

http://egyptology.blogspot.com/

Egyptology Blog:

http://www.egyptologyblog.co.uk/

Dr Leen Ritmeyer's Blog:

http://blog.ritmeyer.com/

Paleojudaica:

http://paleojudaica.blogspot.com/

Persepolis Fortification Archives:

http://persepolistablets.blogspot.com/

Archaeologist at Large:

http://spaces.msn.com/members/ArchaeologyinEgypt/
================================================================
ANCIENT GREECE AND ROME (AND CLASSICS)
================================================================
Cleopatra's pearl story has a kernel of truth in it:

http://www.usatoday.com/tech/science/columnist/vergano/2010-07-23-cleopatra-pear\
l-cocktail_N.htm

A Scythian burial from Kazakhstan:

http://www.eurasianet.org/node/61549
http://www.newkerala.com/news2/fullnews-3610.html

A Bulgarian "Machu Picchu":

http://www.novinite.com/view_news.php?id=118366

A Roman villa from a Wales 'military zone':

http://www.cambrian-news.co.uk/news/i/9239/

Elsewhere in Wales ... a Roman lime kiln:

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-wales-north-west-wales-10714038

A Roman 'neighbourhood' from Lyons:

http://www.digitaljournal.com/article/294997
http://news.oneindia.in/2010/07/24/romanneighbourhood-ruins-unearthed-infrance.h\
tml

Some ancient shipwrecks from off Zannone:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/07/25/AR2010072500708.\
html
http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE66O0HF20100725?feedType=RSS&feedName=lifes\
tyleMolt

A possible Diana sculpture from the former Romuliana:

http://english.blic.rs/In-Focus/6688/Archeologists-found-sculpture-of-Diana-Godd\
ess-of-hunt

Evidence of Middle Bronze Age agriculture from Cyprus:

http://www.cyprus-mail.com/archaeology/archaeological-window-ancient-farming/201\
00722

Feature on recent restorations on the Acropolis and plans to cash in on
Plato:

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-10751210

On the efforts to save Latin in Scotland:

http://news.scotsman.com/scotland/Modern-drive-for-ancient-language.6438534.jp

Poking around in Pompeiian poop:

http://classics.uc.edu/~ellis/PompeiiPoop.pdf

What to do with a Classics degree:

http://www.guardian.co.uk/money/2010/jul/24/classics-degree-graduate-careers

Can't remember if I mentioned this one ... something in an ancient
philosophy vein:

http://opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/06/27/lost-in-the-clouds/

They've fixed up the frescoes from the Villa Farnesina:

http://intransit.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/07/19/frescoes-shown-anew-at-ancient-rom\
an-villa/

On tattoos and the 'Latin craze' (?):

http://www.newkerala.com/news2/fullnews-4667.html

What to serve at a Roman orgy:

http://www.guardian.co.uk/education/2010/jul/19/gourmet-orgy-improbable-research

Assorted efforts to mark the anniversary of Marathon:

http://www.news24.com/World/News/German-plans-2-200km-run-Greece-20100721
http://in.reuters.com/article/idINIndia-50230520100719

More on that Harpocrates from Silchester:

http://www.physorg.com/wire-news/41006529/reading-archaeologists-reveal-the-egyp\
tian-god-of-secrecy.html
http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/2010/jul/16/egyptian-god-relic-identified-silc\
hester

More on Portus:

http://www.research-horizons.cam.ac.uk/features/portus-project--bringing-to-life\
-trajan-s-legacy.aspx
http://blip.tv/file/2644723
http://www.southampton.ac.uk/archaeology/resources/fieldwork_projects/portus.htm\
l
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/09/090930194337.htm
http://heritage-key.com/blogs/bija-knowles/digital-reconstruction-roman-amphithe\
atre-discovered-portus
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/programmes/click_online/8310980.stm
Latest reviews from Scholia:

http://www.classics.ukzn.ac.za/reviews/

Latest reviews from BMCR:

http://bmcr.brynmawr.edu/recent.html

Visit our blog:

http://rogueclassicism.com/
================================================================
EUROPE AND THE UK (+ Ireland)
================================================================
A phallic carving from Sweden is being made into something, er, bigger:

http://www.foxnews.com/scitech/2010/07/21/stone-age-carving-ancient-dildo/
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/38343340/ns/technology_and_science-science/
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/home/science/Worlds-oldest-sex-toy-carved-out\
-of-bone-back-in-4000-BC/articleshow/6203072.cms
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/07/22/ancient-dildo-excavated-i_n_655766.html
http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-501465_162-20011242-501465.html

The SHARP dig blog is up and running again:

http://ccgi.sedgeford.plus.com/blog/

Plenty of coverage of the discovery of another henge near Stonehenge:

http://www.artdaily.com/index.asp?int_sec=11&int_new=39419
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/38360404/ns/technology_and_science-science/
http://abcnews.go.com/International/wireStory?id=11223971
http://news.discovery.com/archaeology/stonehenge-wooden-monument.html
http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20100722/wl_uk_afp/britainarchaeologyhistory_2010072\
2120839
http://www.newkerala.com/news2/fullnews-5468.html
http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2010/07/22/eu_britain_stonehenge/index.html?so\
urce=rss&aim=/news/feature
http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2010/07/photogalleries/100723-stonehenge\
-woodhenge-twin-timber-circle-science-pictures/?now=2010-07-23-00:01
http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2010/07/100723-stonehenge-woodhenge-twin\
-timber-circle-gaffney-science/
http://www.csmonitor.com/World/Europe/2010/0723/Stonehenge-timber-twin-revealed-\
in-shovel-less-dig
http://www.salon.com/technology/archaeology/?story=/news/feature/2010/07/22/eu_b\
ritain_stonehenge
http://www.guardian.co.uk/culture/2010/jul/22/stonehenge-new-discovery
http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/belief/2010/jul/23/stonehenge-twin-site
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/07/22/stonehenge-discovery-wood_n_655451.html
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-10718522
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-10726307
http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/davidgregory/
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/eu_britain_stonehenge
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-10718522

... and they've 'virtually excavated' to find it:

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-wiltshire-10689609
http://www.tonic.com/article/archaeologists-find-stonehenge-timber-twin-without-\
digging/

I'm reasonably certain this remains-of-a-Neolithic-party-in Wiltshire story
was kicking around a few years ago:

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/science/archaeology/news/discovered-stone-age-\
mans-morning-after-the-night-before-2034322.html

... this seems to be more recent:

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-wiltshire-10684042

Experimenting with moving menhirs:

http://www.physorg.com/news198988062.html
http://au.news.yahoo.com/thewest/entertainment/a/-/entertainment/7629690/tourist\
s-heave-menhirs-to-solve-ancient-mystery/

An update of sorts on the Pillar of Eliseg dig:

http://news.bbc.co.uk/local/northeastwales/hi/people_and_places/history/newsid_8\
783000/8783331.stm
http://news.bbc.co.uk/local/northeastwales/hi/people_and_places/newsid_8849000/8\
849374.stm
A siliver ring from Birstall has been declared treasure:

http://www.yorkshireeveningpost.co.uk/news/Historic-treasure-found-in-West.64256\
93.jp

A 13th century (or thereabouts) child's bow from near Novgorod:

http://www.russia-ic.com/news/show/10435/

Remains of Russian Revolution activities from St Petersburg:

http://www.upi.com/Top_News/International/2010/07/19/More-red-terror-remains-fou\
nd-in-Russia/UPI-26891279556579/

More on that Neolithic 'doodle':

http://www.hindustantimes.com/rssfeed/europe/Caveman-s-4-500-year-old-doodle-on-\
rock-discovered/Article1-574123.aspx

More on that old champagne:

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/worldnews/article-1295654/Now-thats-vintage-Dive\
rs-ancient-champagne-1780s-shipwreck-Baltic-Sea.html?ITO=1490
http://www.france24.com/en/20100719-2010-07-19-0710-wb-en-press-review-fran
http://www.google.com/hostednews/afp/article/ALeqM5gUlBVlMg7u8npu_W8--vbfBuHrSQ
http://www.syracuse.com/news/index.ssf/2010/07/divers_find_200-year_old_champ.ht\
ml
http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=128636885

Review of Juliet Nicolson, *The Great Silence*:

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/07/25/books/review/Seymour-t.html

Review of Ruth Harris, *Dreyfus*:

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/07/25/books/review/Damrosch-t.html
Archaeology in Europe Blog:

http://archaeology-in-europe.blogspot.com/

================================================================
ASIA AND THE SOUTH PACIFIC
================================================================
Australia's earliest 'contact' petroglyphs:

http://www.physorg.com/news199101603.html

The salvaging of the Nan'ao-1 has resumed:

http://english.peopledaily.com.cn/90001/90782/7073699.html

Evidence Chinese civilization is even older than previously thought:

http://english.peopledaily.com.cn/90001/90782/7078611.html

Cultivated cucumbers and melons originated in Australia/Asia:

http://www.physorg.com/news198858228.html

Efforts to provide legal protection for Maori sites:

http://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/CU1007/S00252.htm

Plans to excavate 'India's Atlantis':

http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Indias-own-Atlantis-2000-yr-old-underse\
a-town-to-be-excavated/articleshow/6198568.cms
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/chennai/Undersea-probe-to-seek-out-lost-\
port-city/articleshow/6198752.cms

Feature on the Indus Civilization:

http://www1.voanews.com/english/news/asia/Mystery-Shrouds-Ancient-Civilization-i\
n-Pakistan--98967839.html

Feature on Beijing's Gulou district:

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/07/21/world/asia/21beijing.html
East Asian Archaeology:

http://eastasiablog.wordpress.com/2010/05/20/east-asian-archaeology-cultural-her\
itage-%E2%80%93-2052010/

Southeast Asian Archaeology Newsblog:

http://www.southeastasianarchaeology.com/

New Zealand Archaeology eNews:

http://www.nzarchaeology.org/netsubnews.htm
================================================================
NORTH AMERICA
================================================================
A 'woodhenge' from Ohio:

http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2010/07/100720-woodhenge-stonehenge-ohio\
-fort-ancient-science/
http://www.foxnews.com/scitech/2010/07/22/wooden-stonehenge-emerges-prehistoric-\
ohio/

Analyzing human remains from a Western Basin Late Woodland site:

http://www.dispatch.com/live/content/science/stories/2010/07/25/testing-remains-\
provides-new-insights.html?sid=101

A project to 'unravel' the 'puzzle' of the Hohokam ceramic industry:

http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2010-07/smu-nrw072010.php
http://www.physorg.com/news198857381.html

Feature on Range Creek:

http://www.sltrib.com/sltrib/home/49853955-76/fremont-canyon-creek-utah.html.csp
Some 2000 b.p. artifacts turn up during sewer construction in small town
Ontario:

http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/national/sewer-project-halted-by-aboriginal-\
history-find/article1649185/

An interesting find from a Mississippian site in Illinois:

http://www.bnd.com/2010/07/19/1334631/figurine-found-at-new-bridge-excavation.ht\
ml
http://www.bnd.com/2010/07/20/1335048/its-mind-blowing.html

The search is on again for Franklin's ships:

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-10705564

... while elsewhere in the Arctic, they've found some evidence of the Dorset
culture:

http://www.montrealgazette.com/technology/Ghostly+face+carving+unearthed+from+Ar\
ctic+site+extinct+Dorset+culture/3301282/story.html

A Spanish ship is being salvaged (?) off Sebastian (Florida):

http://www.myhometownnews.net/index.php?id=71225
http://southflorida.bizjournals.com/southflorida/stories/2010/07/19/daily16.html

A student's experience digging a Toltec site in Arkansas:

http://lonokedemocrat.com/articles/2010/07/15/lonoke_democrat/news/nws10.txt

Finds from Fort Vancouver:

http://www.columbian.com/news/2010/jul/20/artifacts-found-at-site-of-former-home\
-at-fort-arc/

A member of the Donner Party had some Lincoln documents:

http://www.cnn.com/2010/US/07/20/california.lincoln.document/
http://www.nationalledger.com/ledgerdc/article_272633392.shtml

Searching for an image of Drayton Hall:

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/07/16/arts/design/16antiques.html

Review of Jak Rakove, *Revolutionaries*:

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/07/25/books/review/Anderson-t.html
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/07/25/books/review/excerpt-revolutionaries.html
================================================================
CENTRAL AND SOUTH AMERICA
================================================================
A very interesting burial of a Mayan king in Guatemala (variety of spins):

http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2010/07/100721-maya-tomb-human-fingers-k\
ing-guatemala-science/
http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2010/07/photogalleries/100721-maya-tomb-\
human-fingers-king-guatemala-science-pictures/?now=2010-07-21-00:01
http://www.foxnews.com/scitech/2010/07/19/bowls-human-fingers-teeth-mayan-tomb/
http://www.csmonitor.com/Science/2010/0719/Ancient-finger-bowls-found-in-Mayan-t\
omb-bowls-filled-with-fingers-that-is
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/38310459/ns/technology_and_science-science/
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/science/archaeology/news/guatemalan-tomb-revea\
ls-evidence-of-child-sacrifice-2031012.html
http://www.projo.com/news/content/MAYAN_TOMB_07-20-10_MKJ8MU1_v13.1915987.html
http://news.discovery.com/archaeology/mayan-kings-tomb-found-in-guatemala.html
http://www.prensalibre.com/vida/ciencia/Imagenes-exclusivas-tumba-Diablo_5_29942\
0056.html(photos)
http://content.usatoday.com/communities/sciencefair/post/2010/07/maya-royal-tomb\
-discovered-filled-with-offerings/1

They've reconstructed the face of 'Las Palmas Woman' and have made
some interesting conclusions therefrom:

http://www.artdaily.com/index.asp?int_sec=11&int_new=39450
http://www.physorg.com/news199120922.html
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/feedarticle/9188095
http://www.laht.com/article.asp?ArticleId=361036&CategoryId=13003
http://www.pjstar.com/features/x1953792260/Reconstructed-ancient-woman-suggests-\
diverse-migration
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/38384521/ns/world_news-americas/
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100724/ap_on_sc/lt_mexico_ancient_woman
http://dti.inah.gob.mx/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=4510&Itemid=329

cf (from a couple years ago):

http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/pf/65445213.html

Slideshow:
http://dti.inah.gob.mx/images/stories/Temas_para_ver/2010/mujerpalmas/mujerpalma\
s.swf

Remains of a prehispanic copper foundry (right word?) from Zacatecas:

http://www.artdaily.com/index.asp?int_sec=2&int_new=39373
http://dti.inah.gob.mx/index.php?option=com_content&task=blogsection&id=39&Itemi\
d=150

A Moche 'sacrifice hall' from Peru:

http://www.artdaily.com/index.asp?int_sec=2&int_new=39445
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/38369364/ns/technology_and_science-science/
http://tvnz.co.nz/world-news/human-sacrifice-hall-found-3671392?ref=rss
http://www.redorbit.com/news/science/1895527/ancient_sacrificial_chamber_discove\
red_in_peru/index.html?source=r_science
http://abcnews.go.com/Technology/wireStory?id=11230774

Not sure if we've mentioned this Royal Sican tomb from Peru yet:

http://enperublog.com/2010/07/18/new-royal-sican-tomb-discovered-in-bosque-de-po\
mac/
http://elcomercio.pe/noticia/610191/mas-antiguo-que-senor-sican-conozca-al-perso\
naje-descubierto-cerca-al-bosque-pomac(slideshow)
http://www.andina.com.pe/Ingles/Noticia.aspx?id=o1+45K32mFg=
http://www.physorg.com/news198905349.html

A pre-Columbian burial ground from Costa Rica:

http://www.physorg.com/news198905435.html
http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20100720/sc_afp/costaricaarchaeologycemeterynative_2\
0100720235810
http://www.france24.com/en/20100721-pre-columbian-burial-ground-unearthed-costa-\
rica

I think we've had this 'Maya pools' diving thing before:

http://www.physorg.com/news199023690.html
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2010/07/100722102041.htm
http://www.news.illinois.edu/news/10/0721dive.html
http://www.rdmag.com/News/Feeds/2010/07/environment-extreme-archaeology-divers-p\
lumb-the-mysteries-of/
Mike Ruggeri's Ancient Americas Breaking News:

http://web.mac.com/michaelruggeri

Ancient MesoAmerica News:

http://ancient-mesoamerica-news-updates.blogspot.com/
================================================================
OTHER ITEMS OF INTEREST
================================================================
Possible earliest evidence of human-canine companionship:

http://news.discovery.com/animals/oldest-dog-fossil.html

Coverage of this years British Archaeological Awards:

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-north-east-orkney-shetland-10690484
http://www.culture24.org.uk/history+%2526+heritage/archaeology/art80755

They're thawing out some old scotch from Antarctica:

http://www.artdaily.org/index.asp?int_sec=2&int_new=39424

The future of reading:

http://www.physorg.com/news198955146.html

A dozen archaeologists relate their most memorable finds:

http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2010/07/22/opinion/20100722_Opinion_Archaeolo\
gy.html

On Elizabeth Barrett Browning's 'edginess' (and more):

http://entertainment.timesonline.co.uk/tol/arts_and_entertainment/the_tls/articl\
e7163330.ece

An 1860 meteor(ite?) painting as APOD:

http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/ap100722.html

Tracking the evolution of malaria:

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/07/20/science/20obmalaria.html

Weirdness at Rokeby:

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/07/22/garden/22hudson.html

Tracing a disease along the Silk Road:

http://www.physorg.com/news198836759.html

Female imams from China:

http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=128628514

The Villa Aurora is now open to the public:

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/07/16/greathomesanddestinations/16iht-rerome.html

A history of the living room:

http://opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/07/19/who-lives-in-this-room

Restoring 'The Gross Clinic':

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/07/19/arts/design/19eakins.html

A hidden Ribalta has been restored:

http://www.artdaily.org/index.asp?int_sec=2&int_new=39360

Assorted letters to TLS seem to be of interest:

http://entertainment.timesonline.co.uk/tol/arts_and_entertainment/the_tls/articl\
e7163861.ece

More on using computers to decipher ancient languages:

http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2010/07/100719-science-technology-comput\
ers-lost-languages-translate-bible-hebrew/
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-1296214/Computer-program-translat\
es-ancient-language.html?ITO=1490
http://www.foxnews.com/scitech/2010/07/20/lost-languages-resurrected-computers/
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/home/science/Novel-software-to-decode-worlds-\
lost-languages/articleshow/6193495.cms
http://web.mit.edu/newsoffice/2010/ugaritic-barzilay-0630.html
http://www.physorg.com/news197125636.html
http://people.csail.mit.edu/bsnyder/papers/bsnyder_acl2010.pdf

More on Google's ancient texts project:

http://www.alphagalileo.org/ViewItem.aspx?ItemId=81689&CultureCode=en

More on the antiquity of the Garima Gospels:

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/art/art-news/7872496/Manuscript-found-in-Ethi\
opian-monastery-could-be-worlds-oldest-illustrated-Christian-work.html

More on Tibetan evolution and related matters:

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/07/20/science/20adapt.html

Review of Mary-Kay Wilmers, *The Eitingons*:

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/07/25/books/review/Lourie-t.html
================================================================
TOURISTY THINGS
================================================================
Rome:

http://www.windsorstar.com/travel/Exploring+Rome+many+myths/938344/story.html

Capri (semi-touristy):

http://www.con-telegraph.ie/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=924:on-\
the-isle-of-capri&catid=48:bystander&Itemid=146

Columbia:

http://frugaltraveler.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/07/20/in-colombia-pillories-and-the\
-lonely-planet-people

Jewish Catacombs at Villa Torlonia:

http://www.jpost.com/Travel/TravelNews/Article.aspx?id=181739

Hungarian Wine Regions:

http://travel.nytimes.com/2010/07/25/travel/25Tokaj.html

Berkshire (UK):

http://entertainment.timesonline.co.uk/tol/arts_and_entertainment/the_tls/articl\
e7163376.ece
================================================================
BLOGS AND PODCASTS
================================================================
About.com Archaeology:

http://archaeology.about.com/

Archaeology Briefs:

http://archaeologybriefs.blogspot.com/

Naked Archaeology Podcast:

http://www.thenakedscientists.com/HTML/podcasts/archaeology/

Taygete Atlantis excavations blogs aggregator:

http://planet.atlantides.org/taygete/

Time Machine:

http://heatherpringle.wordpress.com/

================================================================
GENERAL MAGAZINES AND JOURNALS
================================================================
Amphora 9.1:

http://www.apaclassics.org/images/uploads/documents/amphora/Amphora_Spr2010.pdf

================================================================
CRIME BEAT
================================================================
The 'Tome Raider' is back in jail:

http://www.artdaily.org/index.asp?int_sec=2&int_new=39386
http://www.cbc.ca/arts/books/story/2010/07/20/britain-rare-books.html

More sentences in the Utah case:

http://www.moabtimes.com/pages/full_story/push?article-Three+more+sentenced+in+a\
rtifacts+trafficking+sting%20&id=8847270&instance=secondary_five_leftcolumn
http://www.sltrib.com/sltrib/home/49915721-76/blanding-probation-laws-operative.\
html.csp

More on Nova Scotia's treasure laws:

http://www.montrealgazette.com/Nova+Scotia+risks+losing+sunken+wrecks+romance+wi\
th+treasure+hunting+reforms+Critics/3293526/story.html
Looting Matters:

http://lootingmatters.blogspot.com/

Illicit Cultural Property:

http://illicit-cultural-property.blogspot.com/
================================================================
NUMISMATICA
================================================================
Pondering whether to declare the Frome Hoard treasure:

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-somerset-10722715

... and of course, it was:

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-10727124
http://www.google.com/hostednews/ukpress/article/ALeqM5hzi2TQtSqZuj1jVrYSxdSiDpG\
UjA
http://news.bbc.co.uk/local/somerset/hi/people_and_places/newsid_8845000/8845680\
.stm

More on that Pius coin from Galilee:

http://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/138649
http://www.omaha.com/article/20100703/MONEY/707039977
Latest eSylum newsletter:

http://www.coinbooks.org/club_nbs_esylum_v13n29.html

Ancient Coin Collecting:

http://ancientcoincollecting.blogspot.com/

Ancient Coins:

http://classicalcoins.blogspot.com/

Coin Link:

http://www.coinlink.com/News/
================================================================
EXHIBITIONS, AUCTIONS, AND MUSEUM-RELATED
================================================================
A History of the World (BM)

http://www.bbc.co.uk/ahistoryoftheworld/explorerflash/

Renoir:

http://www.pottsmerc.com/articles/2010/07/24/life/srv0000008885342.txt

Play in Medieval Society:

http://www.artdaily.org/index.asp?int_sec=2&int_new=39345

Galileo:

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/07/23/world/europe/23galileo.html

Routes of Arabia:

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/07/24/arts/24iht-melik24.html

Berber Rugs:

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/07/23/arts/design/23rags.html

Renaissance Drawings:

http://entertainment.timesonline.co.uk/tol/arts_and_entertainment/the_tls/articl\
e7160341.ece

Fakes, Mistakes, and Discoveries:

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/07/13/arts/design/13abroad.html

The refurbishment of the Yorkshire Museum is almost complete:

http://news.bbc.co.uk/local/york/hi/people_and_places/arts_and_culture/newsid_88\
40000/8840626.stm

The Israel Museum has been renovated a bit:

http://www.artdaily.org/index.asp?int_sec=2&int_new=39458
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/07/21/arts/design/21museum.html
http://www.nytimes.com/slideshow/2010/07/21/arts/design/21museum.html(photos)

Controversy over a 'swastika quilt' donated to the Greeley Museum:

http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/la-na-hometown-greeley-20100718,0\
,4371528.story

A Nazi loot dispute with the Leopold Museum has been resolved:

http://artsbeat.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/07/20/leopold-museum-to-pay-19-million-fo\
r-painting-seized-by-nazis/

On auctions of Old Masters:

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/07/17/arts/17iht-MELIK17.html
================================================================
PERFORMANCES AND THEATRE-RELATED
================================================================
Lysistrata:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/07/21/AR2010072104602.\
html

Agora:

http://www.bostonherald.com/entertainment/movies/reviews/view.bg?articleid=12696\
25&srvc=home&position=also

Odyssey:

http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2010/07/25/PK8M1EFMR7.DTL

Merchat of Venice:

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/07/21/opinion/21dowd.html

Sufi Music Festival:

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/07/22/arts/music/22sufi.html

Winter's Tale:

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/07/20/arts/music/20incidental.html

Restoring Rosenblatt's voice:

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/07/21/nyregion/21cantor.html
================================================================
ON THE WEB
================================================================
Mike Ruggeri has a new webpage for the Hopewell and Adena cultures:

http://web.me.com/michaelruggeri/MIKE_RUGGERIS_ADENA_AND_HOPEWELL_WORLD/MIKE_RUG\
GERIS_ADENA_AND_HOPEWELL_WORLD.html
================================================================
OBITUARIES
================================================================
Mabel Lang:

http://news.brynmawr.edu/?p=5939
================================================================
DON'T EAT THAT ELMER (A.K.A. CVM GRANO SALIS)
================================================================
This week's nuttiness: Cleopatra and the Virgin Mary were the same woman:

http://www.wireservice.ca/index.php?name=News&file=article&sid=2826
================================================================
PODCASTS
================================================================
The Book and the Spade:

http://www.radioscribe.com/bknspade.htm

The Dig:

http://www.thedigradio.com/

Stone Pages Archaeology News:

http://news.stonepages.com/

Archaeologica Audio News:

http://www.archaeologychannel.org/AudioNews.asp
================================================================
EXPLORATOR is a weekly newsletter representing the fruits of
the labours of 'media research division' of The Atrium. Various
on-line news and magazine sources are scoured for news of the
ancient world (broadly construed: practically anything relating
to archaeology or history prior to about 1700 or so is fair
game) and every Sunday they are delivered to your mailbox free of
charge!
================================================================
Useful Addresses
================================================================
Past issues of Explorator are available on the web via our
Yahoo site:

http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/Explorator/

To subscribe to Explorator, send a blank email message to:

Explorator-subscribe@yahoogroups.com

To unsubscribe, send a blank email message to:

Explorator-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

To send a 'heads up' to the editor or contact him for other
reasons:

rogueclassicist@...
================================================================
Explorator is Copyright (c) 2010 David Meadows. Feel free to
distribute these listings via email to your pals, students,
teachers, etc., but please include this copyright notice. These
links are not to be posted to any website by any means (whether
by direct posting or snagging from a usenet group or some other
email source) without my express written permission. I think it
is only right that I be made aware of public fora which are
making use of content gathered in Explorator. Thanks!
================================================================
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78790 From: marcushoratius Date: 2010-07-26
Subject: Re: Call for the Comitia Curiata to Assemble
Salve Venator

I am a veteran. A disabled veteran in fact, from wounds suffered in the service of my country. I took an oath to defend my country from all enemies, foreign and internal. Therefore as a Senator, a Consularius, and as a veteran, I stand behind Marinus against those who try to impede the Respublica.

Vale
M. Moravius Piscinus


--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Publius Ullerius Stephanus Venator <famila.ulleria.venii@...> wrote:
>
> What say you, Marine?
>
> On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 6:08 PM, Publius Ullerius Stephanus Venator wrote:
> > ...and I ask Marinus to step back and decline.
> >
> > Venator
> >
>
> "I am also moved to ask those amongst us who are veterans of the
> military and naval services of our respective countries, whether or
> not this is a course we would allow in our homelands? ...and keep our
> honor?" - Venator
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78791 From: Cato Date: 2010-07-26
Subject: Re: The Comitia Curiata shall Assemble
Cato Piscino sal.

Your first error is here:

"A legitimate meeting of the Board of Directors was held..."

No, it was not legitimate, and no actions from it are legitimate either.

Under what authority do you call the comitia curiata to invest imperium in an official of whom no word has yet been spoken? Where is the vote tally? Where is the tribunes' report?

It's astounding - you cannot even break the law with any kind of coherence; you're just running around claiming authority to do this and that and the other thing, hoping to get away with it.

Vale,

Cato
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78792 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2010-07-26
Subject: Re: The Comitia Curiata shall Assemble
I half expect Piscinus to appoint Obama Dictator of Nova Roma.

On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 7:45 PM, Cato <catoinnyc@...> wrote:

>
>
> Cato Piscino sal.
>
> Your first error is here:
>
> "A legitimate meeting of the Board of Directors was held..."
>
> No, it was not legitimate, and no actions from it are legitimate either.
>
> Under what authority do you call the comitia curiata to invest imperium in
> an official of whom no word has yet been spoken? Where is the vote tally?
> Where is the tribunes' report?
>
> It's astounding - you cannot even break the law with any kind of coherence;
> you're just running around claiming authority to do this and that and the
> other thing, hoping to get away with it.
>
> Vale,
>
> Cato
>
>
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78793 From: Cato Date: 2010-07-26
Subject: Re: [BackAlley]
Cato Leonino sal.

But I don't think "fpasquinus" was ever a citizen; he just popped up, totally unmoderated, like Minerva from the head of Iuppiter.

Oh, and you and I should try to write something at the same time so we're not accused of being the same person again...

Vale,

Cato

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "csentiusleoninus" <leoninus@...> wrote:
>
> And perhaps you should indicate that you are 2 citizens.
>
>
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, M·CVR·COMPLVTENSIS <complutensis@> wrote:
> >
> > To avoid confusions he should indicate that he is an ex-citizen.
> >
> > M·CVRIATIVS·COMPLVTENSIS
> > PROCONSVL HISPANIAE
> >
> > NOVA ROMA
> >
> > -------------------------------------------
> >
> > ex paucis multa, ex minimis maxima
> >
> >
> > 2010/7/25 Q. Caecilius Metellus <q.caecilius.metellus@>
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > Metellus Plautae sal.
> > >
> > >
> > > > Salve Matt,
> > > > you renounced citizenship in NR on 2009-06-07. I'm not sure you are
> > > entitled
> > > > to use the name of M. Octavius Gracchus.
> > >
> > > It's positions like this that add to the perception that Nova Roma is a
> > > role playing game. If, when one ceases to be a citizen, they are no
> > > longer who they are here, then we really are just playing roles.
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78794 From: marcushoratius Date: 2010-07-26
Subject: Perspectives
Salve Tiberi Galeri

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Timothy or Stephen Gallagher <spqr753@...> wrote:
>
> Ti. Galerius Paulinus
>
>
> "His hope was to remind the world that fairness, justice, and freedom are more than words, they are perspectives."
>

Here are some perspectives for you:

Subscribed to the ML are 1456 members.

Voting in the Comitia Centuriata for praetores suffecti were 55 valid votes. That is 1400 people, and one archive, that isn't interested.

Subscribed to the Senate list are 38 people and an archive. That includes magistrates, tribuni Plebis, 29 senators and senatrices and one censorius who is not a member of the Senate. In other words, outside of those involved in the Senate, few care enough about our disputes to even vote.

Out of those 27 senators who were in attendence at the Senate session, 17 voted in favor of the dictatorship, 2 against. So now you have, literally, a handful of senators, five decrying the Senate session as illegal, as opposed to 17, or 15 considering you and Cato initially voted for dictatorship too. So a quarter of those who participated think their view should hold, as opposed to the other three quarters. The same core group who repeatedly blocks whatever legislation our comitia pass. The same core group who form the moderators of the Back Alley where they are free to deride, insult, defame, and slander our magistrates and sacerdotes. Where you discuss whimsical fantasies on how to plot a coup, to sow discord and disrupt our Res Publica.

In spite of what you few share, the majority of the Board of Directors hold the perspective that our Senate rules were followed, that our Constitution was followed, and that the action taken by the majority of the Board was legal. And you know what? The State of Maine Revised Statutes, the section on the Maine Non-Profit Corporations Act, also holds that an action taken by the majority of the Board of Directors, even if not at a scheduled or at a formal meeting, is in fact a legal action of the Board.

There is no point in wasting our time or band space with this any longer. The decision was already made and we shall now proceed on that decision. The auspices were taken earlier today and, with the approval of the Gods, Marinus is now inaugurated, as reported to the Consules, Censores, and the Tribuni Plebis. The Comitia Curiata is therefore called to invest Marinus with the imperium of dictator in order to serve as the Magister Populi. The transition should be completed within days and then we may get back to business.

As I stated on the Senate floor, we have moved beyond the points you continue to rant - and no one is rallying to your flag - so that now the question has become "How many members of this Senate are willing to stand together, irregardless of our differences, to preserve Nova Roma?"

We await your answer.


Vale

M. Moravius Piscinus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78795 From: Cato Date: 2010-07-26
Subject: From the Senate House
Cato Piscino omnibusque in senatu SPD

You are neither a curule magistrate nor a god so my opinion, Piscinus, carries
exactly as much weight in this House as does yours; some might say even more,
since unlike you I am actually concerned about the health of the *whole*
Respublica, and with abiding by the laws of the Respublica.

Is this creature's words the kind of thing that the members of this House can
expect to receive regularly if he becomes firmly entrenched in a position of
authority under a possible dictatorship?

Senator Equitius Marinus has been neither "appointed" nor "inaugurated" as
anything, Piscinus, and you already call him "dictator" and "magister populi".
The word "sycophant" pops readily to mind. Memmius Albucius is a consul of the
Respublica, with the highest imperium in our government. You would do well to
remember that.

I will state plainly and publicly, for the record, that unless it is made clear
by anyone nominated for the dictatorship - by an oath sworn to the gods and
goddesses of Rome and in the name of the Senate and People of Nova Roma here, in
this House - that Piscinus is NOT to be given ANY level of authority under a
dictator, I will, in fact, refuse to accede to a dictatorship.

His poisonous grasping at power will NEVER be reconcilable to creating an
atmosphere under which this Respublica can be healed, no matter how honorable
and true the actions and intentions of a dictator might be.

Valete,

Cato
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78796 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2010-07-26
Subject: Re: Equestria Iunia Laeca
>
>
>
> A. Tullia Scholastica Ti. Galerio Paulino quiritibus bonae voluntatis
> S.P.D.
>
>
>
> Romans,
>
> May we please stop for a moment. We can get back to killing each other
> shortly.
>
> ATS: I would appreciate it if the internecine strife would end,
> permanently.
>
> I would like to inform everybody that my friend and our CFO Equestria Iunia
> Laeca had surgery last week.
>
> She had both her appendix and her gallbladder removed.
>
> ATS: I am sorry to hear this. She is my friend, too, but although I knew
> she was ill, was not aware of the details.
>
> She is not in great shape. She is very weak and is at this moment on her way
> back to the hospital for another blood transfusion to see her through the
> night.
>
> ATS: My best wishes are with her and her family. May she make a full and
> speedy recovery!
>
>
> I ask all Nova Romans to say any prayers you believe are appropriate for her
> speedy and complete recovery.
>
> Vale bene,
>
> Ti. Galerius Paulinus
>
> Vale et valete bene.
>
>
>



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78797 From: Gaius Petronius Dexter Date: 2010-07-26
Subject: News to the people of Nova Roma.
C. Petronius Dexter Quiritibus s.p.d.,

The "emergency" session was vetoed by the consul Albucius but the "putchists" neglected this point of detail.

The history:
The senator Perusianus describing the situation of Nova Roma in Italy proposed as solution to vote for a dictator and gave the name of the senator Cn. Equitius Marinus. That was the emergency! The first good reaction of Marinus was thinking: "They are crazy!" but instead of keeping his good first reaction, suddenly he agreed to be made dictator if the senators want it. By chance, the consul Fabius Quintilianus had in his toga 3 items among them the dictatorship.

Now the tribunes agenda to call senate to order, is forgotten; senators wanted more. Now tribunes shut up, the senators only vote. Thanks to have convened us, we vote, you watch. And of course, as written on the Constitution, you, tribunes, will lost your right of veto toward any dictator decree. As in Aesop's fable; frogs voting heron as king, tribunes permetting a senate voting for dictator are losing their power of veto. And they do not vote themselves. Here, the "putchists" are real politicians and my colleagues idiot.

Now senators may cross the lines and did not yet follow the agenda of this "emergency" session (vetoed by consul Albucius... a point of detail). As tribune I was whitness of a coup d'Etat. And you must know that if a dictator was elected, the tribunes themselves lose their tribunicia potestas as written on the Constitution. Frankly, do you think that my colleagues can call the senate to make a dictator, a man who abolishes their power of veto? During a session vetoed by consul Albucius? Are they so bad politicians, did they want to commit a suicide? So bad magistrates in order to break their oath of office to defend the Constitution, to protect citizens? A dictator makes void the tribune right of veto, as written on the Constitution. As I said above, tribunes making dictator, is frogs making heron king.

And among the tribunes, there is the Maxima Vestalis virgo. Do you think a such worthy person accepting to break his oath of office? It is not possible, she was elected tribune to defend citizens, no to make a dictator. Not to make, sorry... she can not vote, she watchs, to permit to make a dictator. So senators exceeded the agenda on which they were called and vetoed by consul Albucius... senators care little about this Constitutional veto, as you know. They want a dictator for saving Italy lost. They want a dictator to help Perusianus in his emergency about Italian citizens running away from NR. So sad. Do you think, my fellow citizens, a dictator needed for that? Say me frankly. An energetic Italian governor is most appropriate, is not he?

To make the situation clean, the consul Albucius is now calling the Senate on a new meeting under his auspices and his bundles of rods. Unless putchists decide to achieve their coup...

Continued in a next mail.

Optime valete.

--
C. Petronius Dexter
tribunus Plebis Arcoiali scribebat
a.d. VI Kal. Sext. P. Memmio K. Fabio II coss.


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78798 From: Cato Date: 2010-07-27
Subject: Re: The real call of the tribunes.
Cato Petronio Dextero Octavio Corvoni omnibusque in foro SPD

I would remind the quirites and the tribunes that is is, however, the prerogative of any *senator* to introduce business to the floor of the House for consideration.

Valete,

Cato

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Gaius Petronius Dexter" <jfarnoud94@...> wrote:
>
> C. Petronius Dexter Quiritibus s.p.d.,
>
> My colleagues tribunes did not convene the Senate to vote for a dictator.
> Here the call to order given by my colleague Corvus and then vetoed by consul Albucius:
>
> -----------------------------------
> Corrected: The Emergency session of the Senate Has Been Called to Order - Qvint.
>
>
> Salvete omnes,
>
> please, forgive my mistake, by which I included two items already approved in
> this session agenda: Poltava Municipium and right to use NR logo for me.
> Below is corrected announcement:
>
> Tribunus Plebis Marcus Octavius Corvus omnibus S.P.D.
>
> Salvete, Citizens of Nova Roma
>
> The auspicia having been taken by Censor et Augur Caeso Fabius
> Buteo Modianus and found to be propitious, C. Fabius Buteo Quintilianus Consul,
> C. Curius Saturninus, M. Octavius Corvus, C. Aqvillivs Rota, Tibuni Plebis have
> called the Senate to order.
>
> The Senate shall be called into session with discussions beginning
> from Monday 00.01 hrs CET Roma, 19 July 2010 to Friday 00.01 hrs CET
> Roma, 23 July 2010 [Sunday18.01 EST 18 July to Thurs 18.01 hrs EST 22
> July].
>
> Voting on the agenda will then begin on Friday 23 July 2010 at
> 00.02 hrs CET Roma [Thursday 18.02 22 July] and conclude on Sunday 25
> July 2010 at 00.02 CET Roma [Saturday 18.02 24 July].
>
>
> For the information of the citizens of Nova Roma, here is a brief outline of the
> Senate's agenda:
>
> 1. Changes to our by-laws must be submitted by the end of the
> fiscal to allow a concordance with our corporate needs a that of the
> Res Publica;
> 2. Appontment of a new CFO is needed before the end of the fiscal
> year;
> 3. Immediate action is needed to correct our IT problems in time
> for fall elections;
> 4. And mounting civil discord, a lack of magistrates, and disputed
> elections do not afford swift and decisive decisions on these and
> other issues as required at this time.
>
> Valete bene in pace Deorum,
>
> Marcus Octavius Corvus
> Tribunus Plebis
>
> ---------------------------------------
>
> The first consequence of a dictatorship on the tribunes will be the abolition of their right to veto and intercessio as written on the Constitution.
> -------------
> 7. Tribuni Plebis (Tribune of the Plebs). Five tribunes of the plebs shall be elected by the comitia plebis tributa to serve a term lasting one year. They must all be of the plebeian order, and shall have the following honors, powers, and obligations:
> a. To pronounce intercessio (intercession; a veto) against the actions of any other magistrate (with the exception of the dictator and the interrex),
> ------------------------------
>
> So unless they breake the oath of their office to protect citizens against any magistrate decrees by their veto and adopt a suicide attitude they cannot call for a dictator. But, fortunately, as it is manifeste in the message of my colleague Corvus, the Senate was not called to design a dictator.
>
> Optime vale.
>
> --
> C. Petronius Dexter
> tribunus Plebis Arcoiali scribebat
> a.d. VII Kal. Sext. P. Memmio K. Fabio II coss.
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78799 From: Matt Hucke Date: 2010-07-27
Subject: Re: [BackAlley]
M·CVR·COMPLVTENSIS wrote:

> Matt, ex-Octavius,

Mr. David-Lloyd Pais Alonso,

my name is STILL Octavius, and it will be whenever I interact with any "Roman"
community, in spite of any efforts to make me an "unperson" by deliberately
choosing not to use it.

Having read said "lex", the requirements it imposes are trivial - so yes,
barring malfeasesance and obstructionism by censores, I can indeed "return at
any time".

And winged simians might then fly from my nether orifice, as a great Chicago
philosopher once said.

Vale,
M. Octavius Gracchus,
Consular and Proud Peregrinus.

--
Matt Hucke (hucke@...), programmer.
Graveyards of Illinois - http://graveyards.com/
"Time is an illusion. Lunchtime, doubly so." - D. Adams
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78800 From: Riku Demyx Date: 2010-07-27
Subject: Re: Sententia...
Salve,
I do I just really love that quote.
DTIC
Nero



________________________________
From: Cato <catoinnyc@...>
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Mon, July 26, 2010 3:22:09 AM
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Sententia...


Cato Iunio Neroni sal.

You do see the irony of quoting one of Cicero's orations against Catiline at
this particular time, don't you?

Vale,

Cato

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Riku Demyx <rikudemyx@...> wrote:
>
>
>
> Salve,
> I cannot of course speak for others but as for me I hardly glance at the
>subject
>
> before deleting anymore. More and more I'm reminded of play yard children and
> less and less of citizens of a micronation that wants to emulate the Roman
> republic. People flaunt what they think to be big issues for days and days
> taking up countless messages of...forgive me, prattle and blathering. We can
> tell someone off for wanting a tattoo "because the romans did not hold with
> such" but then look at us? Would the Romans act this way? If we traveled back
> and told Cicero we are what remains of the republic, he would drop to the
> ground laughing.
> I know it sounds harsh but truth is a harsh mistress. Fighting about the back
> alley and legality or Senate meetings, and whether or not someone is a citizen

> is a sad sorry way to spend our time
> Even now when people read my response I'm 9/10ths of the people will have
> something negative to say, and it will lead to more fighting.
> O Tempora O Mores. Quo usque tandem abutere, populi, patientia nostra? Quam diu
>
> etiam furor iste tuus nos eludet? quem ad finem sese effrenata iactabit
>audacia?
>
> I hope we can pull our stuff together, come back together as one united people

> and be proud again in the name Nova Roma
> Let's not just call ourselves Roman but remember what it is to be Roman
> and actually BE Romans
> Let us cast our petty differences aside and practice our gravitas, dignitas,
> virtus, auctorias, hospitium, and pietas(whichever god you chose to worship)
> Let's make ourselves proud to come from Cato, Cicero, Caesar, and Brutus.
> I mean come on people, WE ARE ROME, our ancestors built the everlasting
> monuments and concepts that shaped modern civilization, we were a golden age,
>we
>
> were a perfect age.
> WE ARE ROME
> We are Romans
> We are forever
> Di Vos Incolumes Custodiant.
> GAIVS IVNIVS NERO.
>
>
>
> ________________________________
> From: Publius Ullerius Stephanus Venator <famila.ulleria.venii@...>
> To: NR-Main List <Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com>
> Sent: Sun, July 25, 2010 6:45:42 PM
> Subject: [Nova-Roma] Sententia...
>
>
> Salvete Omnes;
>
> I am moved to ask whether or not the vast majority of Cives Nova Roma
> are reading this list and taking in what is transpiring?
>
> I am also moved to ask those amongst us who are veterans of the
> military and naval services of our respective countries, whether or
> not this is a course we would allow in our homelands? ...and keep our
> honor?
>
> =====================================
> In amicitia et fide
> Publius Ullerius Stephanus Venator
> Civis circa Quintilis MMDCCLI a.u.c.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>







[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78801 From: rory12001 Date: 2010-07-27
Subject: Re: Equestria Iunia Laeca
> >
> > ATS: I am sorry to hear this. She is my friend, too, but although I knew
> > she was ill, was not aware of the details.
> >
> > She is not in great shape. She is very weak and is at this moment on her way
> > back to the hospital for another blood transfusion to see her through the
> > night.
> >
> > ATS: My best wishes are with her and her family. May she make a full and
> > speedy recovery!
Maior Paulino sal;
poor Laeca, she was a wonderful colleague, I miss her. May Apollo Medicus watch over her. And I hope she regains her strength soon. I knew she was very ill, but not this.
Apollo ei faveat
Maior
> >
> > I ask all Nova Romans to say any prayers you believe are appropriate for her
> > speedy and complete recovery.
> >
> > Vale bene,
> >
> > Ti. Galerius Paulinus
> >
> > Vale et valete bene.
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78802 From: Riku Demyx Date: 2010-07-27
Subject: Re: Felt my words needed their own thread.
Salve,
An apology is I believe due to the people of Rome. I admit I was not aware of
the situation however it was not out of total ignorance, the fighting overlaps
with the issues and I admit myself bored when I try to read through the emails
and all I see is fighting. Granted what is being fought for, as has now been
explained to me is a good cause but I doubt I am the first to simply delete
everything.
The truth to me at least remains that the facts should be stated or at the very
least been posted officially so that this mistake does not happen again, I have
now made a public fool of myself because too many harsh words were involved in
the issues. It is very hard to come home and read through a hundred-literally-
emails to get the truth of one issue, do we not have a listing for
official announcements?
I quoted Cicero not to show similarity to the situation but simply that this
fighting has gone on a lot and has tested the patience of some, if the acts are
illegal then let them be punished that is why law is so deliciously brilliant.
If one were to kill a man one should not have to fight about it for days and
days law says murder is wrong end of story. The thing that gets to me is we're
all fighting about it, if the priests have broken state and NR laws then they
should have their NR citizenship revoked or at the very least be stripped of
their priesthoods, same goes for the members of the senate.
On the dictatorship issue, sometimes(1999 for example) dictatorship
is necessary however as I have stated before it depends on who holds the power,
I personally think that someone should for a time fix the issues we are dealing
with in a final way. If NR is in trouble with the law let someone with the power
to do so fix it, if priests are misbehaving, punish them them retire the
dictatorship and let us get on with our republic.
When I mention the four names you gave proof that three are incompatible however
this is only true if looking at the large picture, look at each man
individually: Caesar may have done some terrible things but he also set laws
that were unbelievably beneficial, defeated the Gauls, and all in all was not
afraid to stand up for himself. Brutus gets honors for stopping Caesar when he
went too far, Cicero's words stopped the tyrant Catiline, and Cato walked around
in beggars clothes barefoot for his rights, to me that's just firm standing of
beliefs.
As a matter of record I do not view your words as negative.
I do not wish to see us fall and crumble, but if we are not careful then the big
issues will not only destroy us then the little things as well, which was the
whole point of my post. We need to band together, there is enough strife in the
world without us going at each other's throats as well. I don't mean to get all
tree hugger on ya'll but: can;t we all just bloody get along?
I must go to bed, I pray the Gods get us through this in one peace, I'd like one
day for my children to know Nova Roma.
Di Vos Incolumes Custodiant
Nero

________________________________
From: Gaius Tullius Valerianus <gaius.tullius.valerianus@...>
To: Nova-Roma <Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Mon, July 26, 2010 6:47:41 PM
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Felt my words needed their own thread.


Gaius Tullius Valerianus Gaio Iunio Neroni S.P.D.

Salve! I appreciate what you're trying to do and say - I really do -
but I don't know if you fully grasp the seriousness of what is happening
right now. You wrote:
*People flaunt what they think to be big issues for days and days *
*taking up countless messages of...forgive me, prattle and blathering. *
Right now an illegally held Senate meeting has decided to appoint an
illegal dictator, and a dictator is something Nova Roma has only had once
before (in 1999). And then, by all accounts, things were not so bad as now
(I became a citizen in 2000). We have magistrates and even priests acting in
illegal and immoral ways, and refusing to acknowledge this or mend their
ways. We have accusations of impropriety in financial dealings for new IT
infrastructure (to the tune of $10,000+ US), which is serious in and of
itself, and wouldn't even be necessary (as the honored Octavius Gracchus
points out) had certain people not behaved badly. Nova Roma is a non-profit
organization incorporated in the state of Maine, USA, and now Nova Roma may
be in violation of Maine law - its very legal existence is threatened. So
"what they think to be big issues" really are, in some cases, big issues. I
can attest that many involved in this whole thing on both sides would *rather
*be doing something productive, but the current situation doesn't allow for
it - one doesn't sit about reading Vergil's account of the burning of Troy
while one's own house is on fire and burning down around one.
Now, there are people here who like to prattle and blather. Some would
admit to it, some would not. A lot of it usually goes to other lists - like
the Back Alley, which allows blathering, if one is so inclined. But I don't
think anyone is doing either right now.

You also wrote:
* We can tell someone off for wanting a tattoo "because the romans did not
hold with such" but then look at us? Would the Romans act this way? If we
traveled back and told Cicero we are what remains of the republic, he would
drop to the ground laughing. *
* Now, it does seem to be a fact that the Romans (and Indo-European
cultures in general) did not approve of tattooing, seeing it as servile
self-mutilation and perhaps even unclean, and the scholars among us are
right to point this out to those inquiring about tattooing practices. We
are, of course, NOVA Romans, not ancient Romans, and many of us do have
tattoos (I am not among the tattooed, however). It's up to us whether we
want to have them or not. Let us at least hope that we avoid tattoos in
botched Latin that are so common!*
* But as to your question of "Would the Romans act this way?" Ummm . . .
have you ever studied the Romans? Of course they did - sadly. All too often,
in fact. It is indeed sad to see how bad things have gotten lately around
here - but they're not going to get better on their own. Ironically, you
quote Cicero's words denouncing Catiline, a moment of great crisis in the
old Republic. Would you have had Cicero remain silent, and Catiline's mad
schemes succeed. Nor can we of good conscience remain silent when we see our
beloved Republic threatened, Nero. If you don't want to know about the
struggles tearing apart our Republic, hit the "delete" key. There were
plenty of Romans who decided to stay home and not inquire as to what
Catiline was up to, too. But of course, I would rather you - and all good
citizens with a conscience - would get involved. *
* You have a voice here, Nero. It's up to you how you use it.*

**You also wrote:

> * Even now when people read my response I'm 9/10ths of the people will
> have
> something negative to say, and it will lead to more fighting.*
>
I hope you don't interpret my words as negative. They are not meant to
be, certainly. I'm just trying to offer you some perspective.
You said:

> * Let's not just call ourselves Roman but remember what it is to be Roman
> and actually BE Romans*
>
which is a nice sentiment, but being Roman to many of us *means *not
standing by and letting our elected representatives and priests behave badly
and illegally. It means exactly the opposite of standing by and letting that
sort of thing go unchecked.

You wrote:

> * Let's make ourselves proud to come from Cato, Cicero, Caesar, and
> Brutus.
> I mean come on people, WE ARE ROME, our ancestors built the everlasting
> monuments and concepts that shaped modern civilization, we were a golden
> age, we
> were a perfect age.
> WE ARE ROME*
>
Inspiring words, Nero. Many of us on both sides of the current conflict are
here because of our conviction that Rome offered the world something better,
and we are here to offer it again. I would personally disagree with the
"perfect age" bit - there is some irony in mentioning Cato, Cicero, Caesar,
and Brutus in the same breath (Caesar seemed to threaten the existence of
the Republic, so Brutus decided to betray and murder him, but not before
Cato had killed himself rather than surrender to Caesar. About a year later,
Cicero (who often said he had wished that he had been in on the plot to kill
Caesar) had his head and hands cut off on the orders of Mark Antony with the
agreement of Octavian, the heir of Caesar. The people you mention betrayed
and killed each other and themselves. Hardly "perfect." But still
important.

Vale, Nero!

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]







[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78803 From: Matt Hucke Date: 2010-07-27
Subject: Springtime for Nova Roma
CHORUS:
Nova Roma's in decline,
What a sad, sad story
Needs a new dictator to restore
Its former glory.
Where, oh, where was he?
Where could that man be?
We faked a crisis, then we "found"
The man for you and me.

LEAD TENOR SENATOR:
And now it's...
Springtime for Roma and Marinus.
Write the proscriptions to-day.
We're going to do real things for us.
Look out, here comes Great Marinus!

Springtime for Maior and Piscinus.
Winter for the Consul from France.
Springtime for Caeso and Curius.
Come on, Romans, go into your dance!

SENATOR "ROLF":
I'm a consul in frozen Thule and that is why I'm a useful tool.

SENATOR "MEL":
Don't be stupid, be a smarty, now we'll crush the Boni party!

CHORUS AND STORMTROOPER:
Springtime for Augures, ueber alles!
Tribunes do goose-steps, today.
Omens fall from the skies again.
Roma is is on the rise again.

Springtime for Modianus "Censor"!
Notas for everyone once more!
Winter for Cato and Sulla.
Watch out, BackAlley.
We're going on tour!

MAIOR:
The Dictator is coming, the Dictator is coming, the Dictator is coming!

SENATOR #1:
Ave Marinus!
SENATOR #2:
Ave Marinus!
LEAD TENOR STORMTROOPER:
Ave Marinus!
Springtime for Roma and Marinus!
ALL:
Ave Marinus!

CHORUS:
Our numbers are in decline again.
Roma is on the rise again.

Springtime for Augur and Pontifex!
Vestals are virgins once more!
Springtime for Maior and Piscinus!

Means that...
Soon we'll be going...
We've got to be going...
You know we'll be going....
You bet we'll be going...
You know we'll be going to war!!


--
Matt Hucke (hucke@...), programmer.
Graveyards of Illinois - http://graveyards.com/
"Time is an illusion. Lunchtime, doubly so." - D. Adams
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78804 From: Cato Date: 2010-07-27
Subject: Re: no legal Senate session was called and is still voting
Cato Marco Octavioni sal.

With respect, Marcus Octavius, *no* province has the "right" to abandon the Respublica. They would be encouraged to express their displeasure in any number of ways, but running away should not be considered one of them.

Vale,

Cato



--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Matt Hucke <hucke@...> wrote:
>
> petronius_dexter wrote:
>
> > as you know conspiracy has all the wheels of the Respublica in its hands.
>
>
> The only things they don't control are the provincial mailing lists.
>
> Hispania walked away from Nova Roma, en masse, two years ago.
>
> Will Gallia now do the same?
>
> They certainly have the right, after their consul was so shabbily treated.
>
> Vale,
> M. Octavius Gracchus,
> Consular.
>
> --
> Matt Hucke (hucke@...), programmer.
> Graveyards of Illinois - http://graveyards.com/
> "Time is an illusion. Lunchtime, doubly so." - D. Adams
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78805 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2010-07-27
Subject: Re: An Appeal to The Consuls
>
>
> A. Tullia Scholastica C. Equitio Catoni P. Memmio Albucio Caesoni Fabio
> Buteoni Quintiliano auguribusque quiritibus bonae voluntatis S.P.D.
>
>
> C. Equitius Cato Memmio Albucio Fabio Quintilianusque consules SPD
>
> I appeal to both of you, consuls, to stop this madness immediately.
>
> ATS: May I join in? And add some names to this (you know who you
> are...). As I mentioned in chambers,
> please.for.heaven¹s.sake.let.us.have.a.normal.Senate.session. Make the normal
> proclamation, have the augures take the auspices (and not when the friendly
> local meteorologist says that Mr. Cold Front will meet Ms. Warm Front avec son
> et lumière). Do not veto one another¹s call or the agenda. We have urgent
> business to discuss, and need to do so under clear skies, not hurricane
> clouds.
>
> With even the whisper of illegality, the results of any decisions made at this
> point in time will never, ever, be accepted by a faction within the
> Respublica. This will lead to more and deeper animosities and will aggravate
> the very purposes for which the Senate was called.
>
> ATS: I think you are right. Lately everything has been conducted under a
> cloud: the praetorian elections, the senate session...could we please just
> grow up and ditch these puerile behaviors? Everyone should do his duty (all
> concerned are male; the ekklésiazousai might not put up with this crud):
> consuls; call the senate; augurs take the auspices, and everyone act like
> adults, not like children on a playground playing King of the Castle or
> whatever. This is not some silly game. It is serious business. Head butting
> and obstructionism must go. We have important work to do. Let us get at it.
>
> Quintilianus, you do a grave injustice to all those for whom your harsh words
> echo in the House; Albucius, you do as grave a harm by your silence.
>
> Please, I ask you in the name of the People of the Respublica, call a new
> session of the Senate unworried by any question of legality and let us address
> the items presented to us.
>
> ATS: Récté. We can argue about the legality of this past session until
> the cows come home to Cato in NYC. In any case, I view it as highly
> irregular. Let us do things the right way, let us discuss matters as adults,
> and not be blocked by vetos and claims of incorrect auspices and whatnot. Do
> it. We owe it to the citizens.
>
> valete,
>
> Cato
>
> Valete.
>
>



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78806 From: Timothy or Stephen Gallagher Date: 2010-07-27
Subject: Re: Perspectives
Salve Moravius Piscinus,



�If I am to be hedged in on every side, to be fretted by the perpetual presence of arbitrary will, to be denied the exercise of my powers, it matters nothing to me whether the chain is laid on me by one or many, by king or people.



A despot is not more tolerable for his many heads.�



WILLIAM E. CHANNING, Thoughts



Vale



Ti. Galerius Paulinus



�Necessity is the plea for every infringement of human freedom. It is the argument of tyrants; it is the creed of slaves.� William Pitt





To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
From: MHoratius@...
Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2010 03:25:06 +0000
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Perspectives





Salve Tiberi Galeri

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Timothy or Stephen Gallagher <spqr753@...> wrote:
>
> Ti. Galerius Paulinus
>
>
> "His hope was to remind the world that fairness, justice, and freedom are more than words, they are perspectives."
>

Here are some perspectives for you:

Subscribed to the ML are 1456 members.

Voting in the Comitia Centuriata for praetores suffecti were 55 valid votes. That is 1400 people, and one archive, that isn't interested.

Subscribed to the Senate list are 38 people and an archive. That includes magistrates, tribuni Plebis, 29 senators and senatrices and one censorius who is not a member of the Senate. In other words, outside of those involved in the Senate, few care enough about our disputes to even vote.

Out of those 27 senators who were in attendence at the Senate session, 17 voted in favor of the dictatorship, 2 against. So now you have, literally, a handful of senators, five decrying the Senate session as illegal, as opposed to 17, or 15 considering you and Cato initially voted for dictatorship too. So a quarter of those who participated think their view should hold, as opposed to the other three quarters. The same core group who repeatedly blocks whatever legislation our comitia pass. The same core group who form the moderators of the Back Alley where they are free to deride, insult, defame, and slander our magistrates and sacerdotes. Where you discuss whimsical fantasies on how to plot a coup, to sow discord and disrupt our Res Publica.

In spite of what you few share, the majority of the Board of Directors hold the perspective that our Senate rules were followed, that our Constitution was followed, and that the action taken by the majority of the Board was legal. And you know what? The State of Maine Revised Statutes, the section on the Maine Non-Profit Corporations Act, also holds that an action taken by the majority of the Board of Directors, even if not at a scheduled or at a formal meeting, is in fact a legal action of the Board.

There is no point in wasting our time or band space with this any longer. The decision was already made and we shall now proceed on that decision. The auspices were taken earlier today and, with the approval of the Gods, Marinus is now inaugurated, as reported to the Consules, Censores, and the Tribuni Plebis. The Comitia Curiata is therefore called to invest Marinus with the imperium of dictator in order to serve as the Magister Populi. The transition should be completed within days and then we may get back to business.

As I stated on the Senate floor, we have moved beyond the points you continue to rant - and no one is rallying to your flag - so that now the question has become "How many members of this Senate are willing to stand together, irregardless of our differences, to preserve Nova Roma?"

We await your answer.

Vale

M. Moravius Piscinus






[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78807 From: petronius_dexter Date: 2010-07-27
Subject: Re: [BackAlley]
C. Petronius C. Tullio s.p.d.,

> He was one of our first citizens, certainly one of our most
productive citizens, and he may have resigned his citizenship (a dark day for our Republic, to be sure!) but he did not and can not resign his self, his identity, as a Roman.

Yes, you are right, as I always am J-F Arnoud even if one day I lose my French identity. No problem. The NR Constitution and laws are silent on this point, M. Octavius Gracchus can keep this name as his. It is only good sense.

Vale.

C. Petronius Dexter
tribunus Plebis Arcoiali scribebat
a. d. VII Kalendas Sextiles P. Memmio K. Fabio II coss.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78808 From: marcushoratius Date: 2010-07-27
Subject: a. d. VI Kalendas Sextilias: Profectio ad iter Avernus
M. Moravius Piscinus cultoribus Deorum et omnibus salutem plurimam dicit: Di inferni vos salvam et servatam volunt.

Hodie est ante diem VI Kalendas Sextilias; haec dies comitialis est: Ludi Victoriae Caesaris; profectio ad iter Averni; Aquila exoritur..

The Ludi Victoriae Caesaris continues into its eight day

AUC 817 / 64 CE: Tthe Great Fire of Rome rages for its tenth day.

"Nero meanwhile availed himself of his country's desolation, and erected a mansion in which the jewels and gold, long familiar objects, quite vulgarised by our extravagance, were not so marvellous as the fields and lakes, with woods on one side to resemble a wilderness, and, on the other, open spaces and extensive views. The directors and contrivers of the work were Severus and Celer, who had the genius and the audacity to attempt by art even what nature had refused, and to fool away an emperor's resources. They had actually undertaken to sink a navigable canal from the lake Avernus to the mouths of the Tiber along a barren shore or through the face of hills, where one meets with no moisture which could supply water, except the Pomptine marshes. The rest of the country is broken rock and perfectly dry. Even if it could be cut through, the labour would be intolerable, and there would be no adequate result. Nero, however, with his love of the impossible, endeavoured to dig through the nearest hills to Avernus, and there still remain the traces of his disappointed hope." ~ P. Cornelius Tacitus, Annales 15.42


Di profectio ad iter Averni

"She spoke, and pointed out to him a gleaming golden bough, in the woods of Proserpine, the Juno of Avernus, and ordered him to break it from the tree. Aeneas obeyed, and saw the power of dread Dis, and he saw his own ancestors, and the ancient shade of great-souled Anchises. He learned also the laws of those regions, and the trials he must undergo in fresh wars." ~Ovidius Naso, Metamorphoses BK 14.

Lake Avernus, a crater lake formed in the cauldera of a volcano, was thought to be an enterence to the Underworld. Thus the name for the Underwold became Avernus. The same was thought of the cauldera lake called Lake Pergusa at Enna (Moragantina), Sicily, from which Dis Pater supposedly rose when He seized Proserpina. At Tivoli, where the White Sibyl resided, a special form of sacrifice saw victims led to the water's edge where they would be left to perish in the toxic volcanic exhalations of the place. Lake Avernus, on whose shores the sibyl of Cumae resided, was best known for such exhalations. The procession to the lake may have led to such a place, with the same sort of sacrifices made, these being offered to Dis Pater, Proserpina, and to the other Di inferni. Such locations that exhaled sulfurous fumes, and such sacrifices to infernal deities at such places, were in general related to healing malaria.

"Then there are the virtues of a great number of medicinal springs, and the perpetual fires that burst out in so many places, burning continuously for centuries, and the exhalation of deadly vapours, either emitted from caverns, or from certain unhealthy districts; some of them fatal to birds alone, as at Soracte, a district near Rome; others to all animals, except to man, while others are so to man also, as in the country of Sinuessa and Puteoli. They are generally called vents, 'breathing holes,' and, by some persons, Charon's sewers, from their exhaling a deadly vapour. Also at Amsanctum, in the country of the Hirpini, at the temple of Mephitis, there is a place which kills all those who enter it." ~ Plinius Secundus, Historia Naturalis 2.95 (208)


Our thought for today is from Lucius Annaeus Seneca, On Tranqulity 11

"If Nature should reclaim what She had previously entrusted to us, we too shall say to Her, `Take back the spirit, better than when You gave it me. I do not turn away or hang back. Here ready for You is hat You gave me without my knowledge; I give it back to You with good will; take it away." What hardship is there in returning from whence you came?"
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78809 From: M·CVR·COMPLVTENSIS Date: 2010-07-27
Subject: Re: [BackAlley]
Matt/Octavius

I remember your words. You said (aprox.) " I am disgusted with Nova Roma and
I end my involvement with Nova Roma"

What has changed in Nova Roma? Or just that are too few voices that are
raised to criticize the legal decisions of the Senate? Yes, it must be that
they need your help to make it appear that there are many unhappy citizens.


About what said your philosopher: I have seen worse things out of the mouth
of some.......

M�CVRIATIVS�COMPLVTENSIS
PROCONSVL HISPANIAE

NOVA ROMA

-------------------------------------------

ex paucis multa, ex minimis maxima


2010/7/27 Matt Hucke <hucke@...>

>
>
>
> M�CVR�COMPLVTENSIS wrote:
>
> > Matt, ex-Octavius,
>
> Mr. David-Lloyd Pais Alonso,
>
> my name is STILL Octavius, and it will be whenever I interact with any
> Roman
> community, in spite of any efforts to make me an "unperson" by those who
> deliberately choose not to use it.
>
> Having read said lex, the requirements it imposes are trivial - so yes,
> barring malfeasesance and obstructionism by censores, I can indeed "return
> at
> any time".
>
> And winged simians might then fly from my nether orifice, as a great
> Chicago
> philosopher once said.
>
> Vale,
> M. Octavius Gracchus,
> Consular and Proud Peregrinus.
>
>
> --
> Matt Hucke (hucke@... <hucke%40cynico.net>), programmer.
> Graveyards of Illinois - http://graveyards.com/
> "Time is an illusion. Lunchtime, doubly so." - D. Adams
>
>
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78810 From: marcushoratius Date: 2010-07-27
Subject: Tattoos spark Latin craze
Salvete

Another side to the thread on tattoos, from http://www.newkerala.com/news2/fullnews-4667.html

Becks, Jolie tattoos spark Latin craze amongst school kids

London, July 21 : Latin, one of the most ancient languages, may be on the road to revival as celebrity tattoos spark a craze for the language amongst school goers.

David Beckham sports a tattoo, for instance, that says ''Ut Amem Et Foveam'' (meaning ''So that I love and cherish'') inscribed on his left forearm and ''Perfectio In Spiritu'' (meaning ''Perfection in spirit'') on his right.

While Angelina Jolie's says ''Quod me nutrit me destruit'', which means ''What nourishes me also destroys me''.

The OCR exam board today launched a new Latin qualification aimed at teenagers as secondary schools
increasingly offer the subject, either during the curriculum or after-hours.

A computer-based Latin course backed by Cambridge University is said to have made it easier for schools to offer Latin.

"''It proves how much demand there is for this great subject and will provide the perfect platform for the next generation of classicists," the Daily Mail quoted Boris Johnson, the Mayor of London and a long-standing advocate of Latin, as saying.

So popular is the language these days that even babies are being named in Latin - Olivia (from Latin ''Oliva'' meaning Olive) and Emily (from the Latin ''Aemilianus'', a Latin family name).

Paul Dodd, qualifications manager for languages and literature at OCR, said, "Latin vocabulary has had a rich and lasting influence on English, as well as being the foundation for modern day Spanish, French and Italian."

"Our new Entry Level qualification provides a good bridge to further attainment as well as providing a way of recognising the skills learned," he added.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78811 From: Kirsteen Wright Date: 2010-07-27
Subject: Re: Equestria Iunia Laeca
On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 12:55 AM, Timothy or Stephen Gallagher <
spqr753@...> wrote:

>
> She had both her appendix and her gallbladder removed.
>
> She is not in great shape.
>

I am really sorry to hear this. Of course i will add my prayers to the gods
for her recovery. May the Bona Dea smile on her and may Vesta Mater return
her strong to her hearth.

Flavia Lucilla Merula


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78812 From: Gnaea Livia Ocella Date: 2010-07-27
Subject: Re: Tattoos spark Latin craze
Salve,

Interesting article, but unfortunately this tattoo-based Latin craze definitely hasn't reached us up here in Canada!

Also I'm a little skeptical that the basis for saying that children are being given Latin names is that many girls are named Olivia and Emily... I think it's far more likely that people just happen to like those names. A cousin of mine just named his daughter Olivia, and not because of its connection to Latin!

As for Latin and tattoos - caution is always necessary and I'm hoping that this apparent craze doesn't increase the instances of grammatically incorrect ones! There's a guilty pleasure in marveling at photos of them, but it is quite tragic to know that people are stuck with them.

Vale, et valete,
Livia Ocella


--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "marcushoratius" <MHoratius@...> wrote
>
> Salvete
>
> Another side to the thread on tattoos, from http://www.newkerala.com/news2/fullnews-4667.html
>
> Becks, Jolie tattoos spark Latin craze amongst school kids
>
> London, July 21 : Latin, one of the most ancient languages, may be on the road to revival as celebrity tattoos spark a craze for the language amongst school goers.
>
> David Beckham sports a tattoo, for instance, that says ''Ut Amem Et Foveam'' (meaning ''So that I love and cherish'') inscribed on his left forearm and ''Perfectio In Spiritu'' (meaning ''Perfection in spirit'') on his right.
>
> While Angelina Jolie's says ''Quod me nutrit me destruit'', which means ''What nourishes me also destroys me''.
>
> The OCR exam board today launched a new Latin qualification aimed at teenagers as secondary schools
> increasingly offer the subject, either during the curriculum or after-hours.
>
> A computer-based Latin course backed by Cambridge University is said to have made it easier for schools to offer Latin.
>
> "''It proves how much demand there is for this great subject and will provide the perfect platform for the next generation of classicists," the Daily Mail quoted Boris Johnson, the Mayor of London and a long-standing advocate of Latin, as saying.
>
> So popular is the language these days that even babies are being named in Latin - Olivia (from Latin ''Oliva'' meaning Olive) and Emily (from the Latin ''Aemilianus'', a Latin family name).
>
> Paul Dodd, qualifications manager for languages and literature at OCR, said, "Latin vocabulary has had a rich and lasting influence on English, as well as being the foundation for modern day Spanish, French and Italian."
>
> "Our new Entry Level qualification provides a good bridge to further attainment as well as providing a way of recognising the skills learned," he added.
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78813 From: Gnaea Livia Ocella Date: 2010-07-27
Subject: Re: Equestria Iunia Laeca
How terrible. I did not know Laeca, but I have heard good things about her. I will keep her in my thoughts and I wish her a speedy recovery.

Livia Ocella

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Timothy or Stephen Gallagher <spqr753@...> wrote:
>
>
>
> Romans,
>
>
>
> May we please stop for a moment. We can get back to killing each other shortly.
>
>
>
> I would like to inform everybody that my friend and our CFO Equestria Iunia Laeca had surgery last week.
>
>
>
> She had both her appendix and her gallbladder removed.
>
> She is not in great shape. She is very weak and is at this moment on her way back to the hospital for another blood transfusion to see her through the night.
>
>
>
> I ask all Nova Romans to say any prayers you believe are appropriate for her speedy and complete recovery.
>
>
>
> Vale bene,
>
>
>
> Ti. Galerius Paulinus
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78814 From: Gaius Petronius Dexter Date: 2010-07-27
Subject: Re: HAPPY 60TH BIRTHDAY QUINTILIANUS !
C. Petronius C. Tullio Valeriano sal.,

>>Please, amice, relax a little! There is no need to attack C. Maria
Caecae!

I did not attack Caeca.
I said that politic is not unpleasant and suggested to her to chose as
tattoos chains.
Because of the events impending.

But, I strongly apologize if my words were kept as offending.

Optime vale.

--
C. Petronius Dexter
Arcoiali scribebat
a.d. VI Kal. Sext. P. Memmio K. Fabio II coss.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78815 From: Matt Hucke Date: 2010-07-27
Subject: Re: [BackAlley]
> Matt/Octavius

David Curiatus,

> What has changed in Nova Roma? Or just that are too few voices that are
> raised to criticize the legal decisions of the Senate? Yes, it must be that
> they need your help to make it appear that there are many unhappy citizens.

I feel the people have a right to know what's happening; that Nova Roma was
brought to this crisis by the actions of those very people who are now seizing
absolute control.

It is because of Piscinus's power grab of 2008 that you no longer have a
supported web site. And most of the money in the treasury is about to go toward
repairing the damage he caused, when he and his allies expelled my friends and
made it so I could not possibly work for such an abhorrent organization.

But, congratulations to T. Octavius Pius on inheriting my job. I like him and
wish him well. $10,000 isn't enough compensation for working with crazy people
- he's giving you an excellent deal. I heard most of the other quotes you got
were in the neighbourhood of $20,000, which *delights* me to no end. Remember
these numbers every time you see the words "Pontifex Maximus", because that's
what it's costing you. $10,000, minimum, because they weren't content with a
majority of Pontifices; they had to humiliate Cassius and Cincinnatus as well.

Furthermore, as the conspirators have been silent about their intentions for the
dictatorship, I suspect that some of my few remaining friends here are about to
be purged. The irregular way this dictatorship came about - an unprecedented
joint session by consul and tribunes together, followed by a last-minute change
of agenda at the *end* of the debate period, the most drastic and far-reaching
item ever considered by the Senate slipped in with only a few *hours* to debate
it... that doesn't bode well, does it? When the conspirators rely on
parliamentary tricks to move their agenda and remain mute on what their actual
intentions are, assuming the worst is generally a safe bet.

So it's vital that the truth be told now, before everything gets locked down
completely, and there are none remaining to hear it.

Many unhappy citizens? No. Many unhappy ex-citizens. This measure only passed
because the Senate has been stuffed with fawning lackeys and "yes-men". And
those Senators who could have stopped it - the people who actually *built* Nova
Roma - have long since departed. I speak for them.

The last remnants of the Old Republic have been swept away.

Vale,
M. Octavius Gracchus,
Remnant of the Old Republic,
not a citizen of Zombie-Roma.

--
Matt Hucke (hucke@...), programmer.
Graveyards of Illinois - http://graveyards.com/
"Time is an illusion. Lunchtime, doubly so." - D. Adams
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78816 From: Matt Hucke Date: 2010-07-27
Subject: Re: News to the people of Nova Roma.
C. Petronius Dexter Quiritibus s.p.d.,

> The senator Perusianus describing the situation of Nova Roma in Italy
> proposed as solution to vote for a dictator and gave the name of the
> senator Cn. Equitius Marinus. That was the emergency!

Interesting!

I had not thought Perusianus one of the chief conspirators - I'd have expected
that a dictatorship would be proposed by Piscinus, or Modianus, or Caeso Fabius.

Yet I can see how "plausible deniability" requires that the idea seem to
originate from someone on the fringes of the cabal. Indeed, there is precedent
for it.

For there was another occasion where a Senator stood up, during a manufactured
crisis, and made a speech calling for dictatorial power to be given to one of
his colleagues. That Senator was not one of the "inner party"; he was on the
fringes of the conspiracy only. But his "friends" steered him towards the idea
in private, and he made the speech, and as he wasn't perceived as part of the
cabal, the Senate voted in favour. And we all know what happened next, do we not?

That senator's name was Jar-Jar Binks.

Vale,
M. Octavius Gracchus,
a member of the Rebel Alliance,
and a traitor to the Empire.

--
Matt Hucke (hucke@...), programmer.
Graveyards of Illinois - http://graveyards.com/
"Time is an illusion. Lunchtime, doubly so." - D. Adams
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78817 From: M Arminius Maior Date: 2010-07-27
Subject: IT and treasury; was (Re: [Nova-Roma] [BackAlley])
Salve


This post make me think.
It is said that our website is pretty much obsolete, patched to death, undocumented, and is better to re-make it.
Of course, if M. Gracchus was in charge, he could do it cheaper (or for free), faster, better; or perhaps he would decline the task, feeling the same Sisyphus malaise that he describes. Anyway, i dont feel bad for having to pay for a service instead of receiving a gift from above.
I will donate 50 bucks monthly to NR, until we have 10 kilobucks for this end, so our treasury could be preserved. If, say, 17 cives do so too, we will have the ten-thousand recovered in one year.


Vale
M. Arminius Maior

--- Em ter, 27/7/10, Matt Hucke <hucke@...> escreveu:
> Matt/Octavius

David Curiatus,

> What has changed in Nova Roma? Or just that are too few voices that are
> raised to criticize the legal decisions of the Senate? Yes, it must be that
> they need your help to make it appear that there are many unhappy citizens.

I feel the people have a right to know what's happening; that Nova Roma was
brought to this crisis by the actions of those very people who are now seizing
absolute control.

It is because of Piscinus's power grab of 2008 that you no longer have a
supported web site. And most of the money in the treasury is about to go toward
repairing the damage he caused, when he and his allies expelled my friends and
made it so I could not possibly work for such an abhorrent organization.

But, congratulations to T. Octavius Pius on inheriting my job. I like him and
wish him well. $10,000 isn't enough compensation for working with crazy people
- he's giving you an excellent deal. I heard most of the other quotes you got
were in the neighbourhood of $20,000, which *delights* me to no end. Remember
these numbers every time you see the words "Pontifex Maximus", because that's
what it's costing you. $10,000, minimum, because they weren't content with a
majority of Pontifices; they had to humiliate Cassius and Cincinnatus as well.

Furthermore, as the conspirators have been silent about their intentions for the
dictatorship, I suspect that some of my few remaining friends here are about to
be purged. The irregular way this dictatorship came about - an unprecedented
joint session by consul and tribunes together, followed by a last-minute change
of agenda at the *end* of the debate period, the most drastic and far-reaching
item ever considered by the Senate slipped in with only a few *hours* to debate
it... that doesn't bode well, does it? When the conspirators rely on
parliamentary tricks to move their agenda and remain mute on what their actual
intentions are, assuming the worst is generally a safe bet.

So it's vital that the truth be told now, before everything gets locked down
completely, and there are none remaining to hear it.

Many unhappy citizens? No. Many unhappy ex-citizens. This measure only passed
because the Senate has been stuffed with fawning lackeys and "yes-men". And
those Senators who could have stopped it - the people who actually *built* Nova
Roma - have long since departed. I speak for them.

The last remnants of the Old Republic have been swept away.

Vale,
M. Octavius Gracchus,
Remnant of the Old Republic,
not a citizen of Zombie-Roma.

--
Matt Hucke (hucke@...), programmer.
Graveyards of Illinois - http://graveyards.com/
"Time is an illusion. Lunchtime, doubly so." - D. Adams
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78818 From: M•IVL•SEVERVS Date: 2010-07-27
Subject: Re: Equestria Iunia Laeca
Salvete,
My dear friend E. Iunia Laeca, outstanding human being and true Roman, is in my thoughts.
May de Godesses and Gods of Rome keep her well and healthy!
Valete,
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78819 From: Gnaeus Iulius Caesar Date: 2010-07-27
Subject: Re: IT and treasury; was (Re: [Nova-Roma] [BackAlley])
Cn. Iulius Caesar sal.

Exactly!

In the short term we simply have to consider retaining the services of Octavius, and if we have to pay to "patch" this - let us do it and if the current host will not allow the web on its servers due to apparent security glitches, then let us consult Octavius on this too and see what can be done to cure the issues, and if it cannot or if the service provider is being very rigid, let us look around for another host.

Long term a monthly donation is also an idea that has been mooted before and should be explored in tandem with fixing what is necessary to fix in the short term.

I simply don't believe that the only option is to invest $10,000. In fact I know it isn't the only option, but it is the only option that the Junior Consul wished to support. In fact he absolutely refused to consider patching this program, which makes no sense to me when the investment sum is half our treasury and the existing program can be made to function again. Until we have a stable and healthy tax base and a growing membership investing this amount is sheer madness.

If you were about to be laid off, made redundant, from your job would you go and purchase a new car that would deplete your savings by half, knowing that eventually the car would be out of date, that there would be regular maintenance and running costs? Would you think it sane to purchase a car with more bells and whistles and gadgets attached than your current one? Would that be a rational financial decision or a profligate expense that fails to take account of your situation?

So too with Nova Roma. If our revenues sink further or the expenditure outsrips our income, why on earth at this point of what is without doubt a decline would we take such a risk? Whatever the website design, the tools, some people will always detest the choices made. Such is personal preference for technology.

All we need to do is repair our current program and get it back on the road. Anything else is a wasteful indulgence and poor financial management.

Finally, it was this demand for the new program that formed the base for the illegal senate session to appoint a dictator. The junior consul seems determined to hand over $10,000 to a former citizen and one time political ally and maybe friend. It is all exceptionally improper.

Now the "experts" will probably arrive to convince you of the aboslute pressing need to waste $10,000. Remember the car citizens, would you buy a car like that under the circumstances I described? Insanity, as is the whole dictatorship plot.

Optime valete.


--- On Tue, 7/27/10, M Arminius Maior <marminius@...> wrote:

> From: M Arminius Maior <marminius@...>
> Subject: IT and treasury; was (Re: [Nova-Roma] [BackAlley])
> To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> Date: Tuesday, July 27, 2010, 9:20 AM
> Salve
>
>
> This post make me think.
> It is said that our website is pretty much obsolete,
> patched to death, undocumented, and is better to re-make
> it.
> Of course, if M. Gracchus was in charge, he could do it
> cheaper (or for free), faster, better; or perhaps he would
> decline the task, feeling the same Sisyphus malaise that he
> describes. Anyway, i dont feel bad for having to pay for a
> service instead of receiving a gift from above.
> I will donate 50 bucks monthly to NR, until we have 10
> kilobucks for this end, so our treasury could be preserved.
> If, say, 17 cives do so too, we will have the ten-thousand
> recovered in one year.
>
>
> Vale
> M. Arminius Maior
>
> --- Em ter, 27/7/10, Matt Hucke <hucke@...>
> escreveu:
> > Matt/Octavius
>
> David Curiatus,
>
> > What has changed in Nova Roma? Or just that are too
> few voices that are
> > raised to criticize the legal decisions of the Senate?
> Yes, it must be that
> > they need your help to make it appear that there are
> many unhappy citizens.
>
> I feel the people have a right to know what's happening;
> that Nova Roma was
> brought to this crisis by the actions of those very people
> who are now seizing
> absolute control.
>
> It is because of Piscinus's power grab of 2008 that you no
> longer have a
> supported web site. And most of the money in the treasury
> is about to go toward
> repairing the damage he caused, when he and his allies
> expelled my friends and
> made it so I could not possibly work for such an abhorrent
> organization.
>
> But, congratulations to T. Octavius Pius on inheriting my
> job. I like him and
> wish him well. $10,000 isn't enough compensation for
> working with crazy people
> - he's giving you an excellent deal. I heard most of the
> other quotes you got
> were in the neighbourhood of $20,000, which *delights* me
> to no end. Remember
> these numbers every time you see the words "Pontifex
> Maximus", because that's
> what it's costing you. $10,000, minimum, because they
> weren't content with a
> majority of Pontifices; they had to humiliate Cassius and
> Cincinnatus as well.
>
> Furthermore, as the conspirators have been silent about
> their intentions for the
> dictatorship, I suspect that some of my few remaining
> friends here are about to
> be purged. The irregular way this dictatorship came about -
> an unprecedented
> joint session by consul and tribunes together, followed by
> a last-minute change
> of agenda at the *end* of the debate period, the most
> drastic and far-reaching
> item ever considered by the Senate slipped in with only a
> few *hours* to debate
> it... that doesn't bode well, does it? When the
> conspirators rely on
> parliamentary tricks to move their agenda and remain mute
> on what their actual
> intentions are, assuming the worst is generally a safe
> bet.
>
> So it's vital that the truth be told now, before everything
> gets locked down
> completely, and there are none remaining to hear it.
>
> Many unhappy citizens? No. Many unhappy ex-citizens. This
> measure only passed
> because the Senate has been stuffed with fawning lackeys
> and "yes-men". And
> those Senators who could have stopped it - the people who
> actually *built* Nova
> Roma - have long since departed. I speak for them.
>
> The last remnants of the Old Republic have been swept
> away.
>
> Vale,
> M. Octavius Gracchus,
> Remnant of the Old Republic,
> not a citizen of Zombie-Roma.
>
> --
> Matt Hucke (hucke@...),
> programmer.
> Graveyards of Illinois - http://graveyards.com/
> "Time is an illusion. Lunchtime, doubly so." - D. Adams
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>      
>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>     Nova-Roma-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com
>
>
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78820 From: Cn. Cornelius Lentulus Date: 2010-07-27
Subject: A little refreshing bit of Roman culture: The "De legibus" on Dictat
Cn. Lentulus omnibus Latinis et Latinae linguae studentibus sal.

I would like to direct the focus to a cultural and educational aspect of the current controversy, and I think translating this to English would be a nice cultural lesson on how Roman legal thinking interpreted the office of dictator, and when they thought a dictator might be or needed to be appointed.

I give this as a homework, just for fun, to our Latinists and students of Latin language. It is quite difficult, because it is written in archaic Latin style, but that's the better for you! If you translate it, you have learned a bit of Old Latin.

So what said the Romans about dictator, or "populi magister" (as it's called in Old Latin)?

"Ast quando duellum gravius discordiaeve civium
escunt, oenus ne amplius sex menses, si senatus creverit, idem iuris
quod duo consules teneto, isque ave sinistra dictus populi magister
esto. Equitatumque qui regat habeto pari iure cum eo quicumque erit
iuris disceptator." (Cicero, De legibus, III.3.9)

I'm waiting for the translation!

Curate ut valeatis!





[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78821 From: M·CVR·COMPLVTENSIS Date: 2010-07-27
Subject: Re: [BackAlley]
> I feel the people have a right to know what's happening;

Yes, sure, the people has the right to know but does he need a
subjetive information?

> ............................he and his allies expelled my friends and
> made it so I could not possibly work for such an abhorrent organization.

He expelled? I do not remember that thing happen that way, I remember
a few voluntary resignations.....

> ............they had to humiliate Cassius and Cincinnatus as well.

Strange view of things....or stange point of view. Two people who
tried to retain lifetime control of Religio against your own
recommendations

> ............................conspirators..............................................

This sound a persecution mania.

> Many unhappy citizens? No. Many unhappy ex-citizens. ........

Here I will give you the reason.

Are many the unhappy ex-citizens, especially those who have left NR
tired of listening to the panegyrics of Sulla, who have grown tired of
the pseudo-legal debates of Cato and Caesar, those who advised the
Senate of Nova Roma for the existing problems and were treated as
traitors, those who are tired of request changes in NR and only
received the answer that NR is a private club of the founders of NR
and a place where only those who were present at the founding of NR
can speak and decide ....



How many of your friends have left NR? 2? 3? 10? 20? And they left the
organization as a tantrum because things were not made as they said.

My friends, who tired of such demagoguery, have abandoned NR can be
counted by hundreds.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78822 From: Matt Hucke Date: 2010-07-27
Subject: Re: IT and treasury; was (Re: [Nova-Roma] [BackAlley])
On 07/27/2010 10:20 AM, M Arminius Maior wrote:

> It is said that our website is pretty much obsolete, patched to death,
> undocumented, and is better to re-make it.

Agreed. It was written over the course of eight years, going back to the "stone
knives and bearskins" era of web technology, and it's in a programming language
that isn't really being used for this sort of work anymore. And I really did
think I'd be here forever, so I didn't make documentation a priority...
especially since this was a free site, a *gift* from me to an organization I
loved, and I'd rather work on the exciting features than the dull part.

Some things like century allocation and voting setup were done from the command
line (i.e., an 'experts-only' mode) because I considered those "solved" problems
and would rather work on interesting features like Paypal automation or Album
Civium portraits and rank badges; and I thought I'd be willing and able to take
the five minutes to assign centuries from the command line for years to come -
there's no point in automating something takes five minutes a year!

But then Something Happened in the Collegium Pontificum, and my motivation level
dropped below zero *very* quickly.

> Of course, if M. Gracchus was in charge, he could do it cheaper (or for free),
> faster, better; or perhaps he would decline the task,

I could certainly do it better now - my skills have improved tremendously in the
last two years, because I transitioned from having one job and using one
programming language to having three jobs where I use five languages regularly -
this has led to new ways of thinking, new approaches, better problem solving
skills, and better understanding of the conventions of the Art such that I'm not
constantly reinventing the wheel. It is regularly said in my field that a
programmer's harshest critic is himself, five years later, and this holds true
for me.

Though I've made a few senators aware of my billable rate, I'm not seeking the
job, and I think in any case I'm probably too controversial to be employable by
this organization. I remain available as a last resort only.

T. Octavius Pius, another ex-citizen who tired of all the fighting, has
apparently agreed to do it for about half what anyone else would charge.
Assuming he's still willing, and has the skills, you *absolutely* should hire him.

And try not to piss him off! Programmers in general do *not* take well to
taking orders from people with muddy or illogical thinking; very large billable
rates are the only thing that makes that even temporarily possible.

Vale,
M. Octavius Gracchus,
Prior perl programmer, presently practicing polyglot, peregrinus.

--
Matt Hucke (hucke@...), programmer.
Graveyards of Illinois - http://graveyards.com/
"Time is an illusion. Lunchtime, doubly so." - D. Adams
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78823 From: Matt Hucke Date: 2010-07-27
Subject: Re: IT and treasury; was (Re: [Nova-Roma] [BackAlley])
Salve Gnae Iuli,

>
> In the short term we simply have to consider retaining the services of Octavius,

wait.... no. Hell no.

That is not an option. I'm not going to be shackled to this *thing*.

It's gasping, ancient, and in a dying language that I no longer wish to spend my
days immersed in.

I didn't return to this mailing list to try to find work - I have three ongoing
jobs as it is. I am *especially* not seeking a job putting another layer of
duct tape on something I wrote between five and ten years ago.

I also am not willing to facilitate a smooth election this November, for that
will let the Piscinine conspiracy claim that "ALL IS WELL", and the coup will be
swept under the rug. I'd rather sit back and watch the chaos.

If they want to talk to me about converting it to Rails or Django over the
course of an entire year, then I *might* be interested, but there are *lots* of
people who can do that, with a lot less baggage, and more free time.

I *absolutely* *don't* want the perl and duct tape job, especially given the
events of the last few days.

> I simply don't believe that the only option is to invest $10,000.

The other option is to invest $20K.

T. Octavius Pius has given you an excellent price quote (I am told), and if he
is still willing, you should take it. Yes, I know he's a friend of one of the
conspirators who orchestrated the power grab, but it's for that reason that he's
willing to do the work for half of what anyone else (including me) would charge.

> Now the "experts" will probably arrive to convince you of the aboslute > pressing need to waste $10,000.

Much as it pains me to agree with the conspirators, they're right on this issue.
They completely bungled it by failing to work *with* consul Albucius, instead
choosing to bully and then ignore him, but they're right (like a broken watch,
twice a day) on this one thing.

Vale,
M. Octavius Gracchus,
free at last, free at last,
thank gods almighty, I'm
free at last.


--
Matt Hucke (hucke@...), programmer.
Graveyards of Illinois - http://graveyards.com/
"Time is an illusion. Lunchtime, doubly so." - D. Adams
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78824 From: Gnaeus Iulius Caesar Date: 2010-07-27
Subject: Re: [BackAlley]
Caesar sal.

I suspect an exageration here. Nova Roma didn't have hundreds of members to lose in the first place and I highly doubt whether Complutensis has hundreds of friends. Maybe they were all the same person? Given the sockpuppet affair if he did have hundreds of members who left, maybe the same person created hundreds of fake membership applications and was the person who hacked his computer? Or maybe Complutensis was talking to all his imaginary friends in a mirror.

As for pseudo-legal debates I don't know how he has the gall to talk about that, given his skill in making the law up as he went along in the trial of Cincinnatus, to suit the needs of the moment and secure a conviction.

Optime valete

--- On Tue, 7/27/10, M·CVR·COMPLVTENSIS <complutensis@...> wrote:

> From: M·CVR·COMPLVTENSIS <complutensis@...>
> Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] [BackAlley]
> To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> Date: Tuesday, July 27, 2010, 11:14 AM
> > I feel the people have a right
> to know what's happening;
>
> Yes, sure, the people has the right to know but does he
> need a
> subjetive information?
>
> > ............................he and his allies expelled
> my friends and
> > made it so I could not possibly work for such an
> abhorrent organization.
>
> He expelled? I do not remember that thing happen that way,
> I remember
> a few voluntary resignations.....
>
> > ............they had to humiliate Cassius and
> Cincinnatus as well.
>
> Strange view of things....or stange point of view. Two
> people who
> tried to retain lifetime control of Religio against your
> own
> recommendations
>
> >
> ............................conspirators..............................................
>
> This sound a persecution mania.
>
> > Many unhappy citizens? No. Many unhappy ex-citizens.
> ........
>
> Here I will give you the reason.
>
> Are many the unhappy ex-citizens, especially those who have
> left NR
> tired of listening to the panegyrics of Sulla, who have
> grown tired of
> the pseudo-legal debates of Cato and Caesar, those who
> advised the
> Senate of Nova Roma for the existing problems and were
> treated as
> traitors, those who are tired of request changes in NR and
> only
> received the answer that NR is a private club of the
> founders of NR
> and a place where only those who were present at the
> founding of NR
> can speak and decide ....
>
>
>
> How many of your friends have left NR? 2? 3? 10? 20? And
> they left the
> organization as a tantrum because things were not made as
> they said.
>
> My friends, who tired of such demagoguery, have abandoned
> NR can be
> counted by hundreds.
>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>     Nova-Roma-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com
>
>
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78825 From: M·CVR·COMPLVTENSIS Date: 2010-07-27
Subject: Re: [BackAlley]
Short memory Cesar, yours short memory.

Imbecillia, egocentrism, smarty..........is that you see in your mirror
honorable Senator.

I have a lot of friends caro Caesar......but really I doubt that you have
another ffriend who is not a keyboard.

The problem is that you do not recognize the obvius, you would not be able
to recognize it having it stuck in the nose.



M·CVRIATIVS·COMPLVTENSIS
PROCONSVL HISPANIAE

NOVA ROMA

-------------------------------------------

ex paucis multa, ex minimis maxima


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78826 From: Sabinus Date: 2010-07-27
Subject: Short notice about objections received to the Senate meeting.
SALVETE!

That is to inform that, at this time, after the meeting of the Senate called by the Consul minor and four Tribunes (except Ti. Petronius Dexter), eleven objections to the meeting were received and recorded.
The following Senators presented their written objections to the meeting:

P. Meemius Albucius – Consul maior, Senator praetorius.
Ti. Galerius Paulinus – Senator censorius.
Dec. Iunius Palladius Invictus – Senator censorius.
C. Flavius Diocletianus – Senator censorius.
L. Cornelius Sulla Felix - Senator censorius.
Q. Fabius Maximus – Senator consularis.
T. Iulius Sabinus – Censor, Senator consularis.
C. Equitius Cato – Senator praetorius.
Cn. Iulius Caesar – Senator aedilicius.
Q. Suetonius Paulinus – Senator tribunicius.
C. Vipsanius Agrippa – Senator tribunicius.

VALETE,
T. Iulius Sabinus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78827 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2010-07-27
Subject: Re: [BackAlley]
Compy, you are confusing Caesar with yourself. Maybe the illness that
Piscinus is suffering from is contagious?

2010/7/27 M�CVR�COMPLVTENSIS <complutensis@...>

>
>
> Short memory Cesar, yours short memory.
>
> Imbecillia, egocentrism, smarty..........is that you see in your mirror
> honorable Senator.
>
> I have a lot of friends caro Caesar......but really I doubt that you have
> another ffriend who is not a keyboard.
>
> The problem is that you do not recognize the obvius, you would not be able
> to recognize it having it stuck in the nose.
>
>
> M�CVRIATIVS�COMPLVTENSIS
> PROCONSVL HISPANIAE
>
> NOVA ROMA
>
> -------------------------------------------
>
> ex paucis multa, ex minimis maxima
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78828 From: Gnaeus Iulius Caesar Date: 2010-07-27
Subject: Re: [BackAlley]
Tsk tsk, such petulance. You displayed that in the farce you outrageously described as a trial. You really should get better at controlling that temper of yours.

As to what I think you see when you look in the mirror, I don't know you enough to say you are an imbecile, but yes I do think you are egocentric, albiet not very smart.

I am sure you do have lots and lots of friends. Did it take an awfully long time to create them all?

Caesar

--- On Tue, 7/27/10, M·CVR·COMPLVTENSIS <complutensis@...> wrote:

> From: M·CVR·COMPLVTENSIS <complutensis@...>
> Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] [BackAlley]
> To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> Date: Tuesday, July 27, 2010, 11:50 AM
> Short memory Cesar, yours short
> memory.
>
> Imbecillia, egocentrism, smarty..........is that you see in
> your mirror
> honorable Senator.
>
> I have a lot of friends caro Caesar......but really I doubt
> that you have
> another ffriend who is not a keyboard.
>
> The problem is that you do not recognize the obvius, you
> would not be able
> to recognize it having it stuck in the nose.
>
>
>
> M·CVRIATIVS·COMPLVTENSIS
> PROCONSVL HISPANIAE
>
> NOVA ROMA
>
> -------------------------------------------
>
> ex paucis multa, ex minimis maxima
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>     Nova-Roma-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com
>
>
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78829 From: M·CVR·COMPLVTENSIS Date: 2010-07-27
Subject: Re: [BackAlley]
Sulla

Thank the gods yours is not contagious......


M·CVRIATIVS·COMPLVTENSIS
PROCONSVL HISPANIAE

NOVA ROMA

-------------------------------------------

ex paucis multa, ex minimis maxima
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78830 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2010-07-27
Subject: Re: [BackAlley]
Well, that's a given considering I am not ill. ;) OH that's not what you
meant! Hahaha you made a funny. LOL

2010/7/27 M�CVR�COMPLVTENSIS <complutensis@...>

>
>
> Sulla
>
> Thank the gods yours is not contagious......
>
>
> M�CVRIATIVS�COMPLVTENSIS
> PROCONSVL HISPANIAE
>
> NOVA ROMA
>
> -------------------------------------------
>
> ex paucis multa, ex minimis maxima
>
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78831 From: M·CVR·COMPLVTENSIS Date: 2010-07-27
Subject: Re: [BackAlley]
Truth hurt you?

Ups! Sorry, forgot you are short-sighted.


M·CVRIATIVS·COMPLVTENSIS
PROCONSVL HISPANIAE

NOVA ROMA

-------------------------------------------

ex paucis multa, ex minimis maxima


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78832 From: Gnaeus Iulius Caesar Date: 2010-07-27
Subject: Re: [BackAlley]
Well sighted enough to know a consular sockpuppet when I see one ;)

Caesar

--- On Tue, 7/27/10, M·CVR·COMPLVTENSIS <complutensis@...> wrote:

> From: M·CVR·COMPLVTENSIS <complutensis@...>
> Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] [BackAlley]
> To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> Date: Tuesday, July 27, 2010, 12:06 PM
> Truth hurt you?
>
> Ups! Sorry, forgot you are short-sighted.
>
>
> M·CVRIATIVS·COMPLVTENSIS
> PROCONSVL HISPANIAE
>
> NOVA ROMA
>
> -------------------------------------------
>
> ex paucis multa, ex minimis maxima
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>     Nova-Roma-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com
>
>
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78833 From: M·CVR·COMPLVTENSIS Date: 2010-07-27
Subject: Re: [BackAlley]
Forgot your problem?
M·CVRIATIVS·COMPLVTENSIS
PROCONSVL HISPANIAE

NOVA ROMA

-------------------------------------------

ex paucis multa, ex minimis maxima



2010/7/27 Robert Woolwine <robert.woolwine@...>:
> Well, that's a given considering I am not ill. ;)  OH that's not what you
> meant! Hahaha you made a funny. LOL
>
> 2010/7/27 M·CVR·COMPLVTENSIS <complutensis@...>
>
>>
>>
>> Sulla
>>
>> Thank the gods yours is not contagious......
>>
>>
>> M·CVRIATIVS·COMPLVTENSIS
>> PROCONSVL HISPANIAE
>>
>> NOVA ROMA
>>
>> -------------------------------------------
>>
>> ex paucis multa, ex minimis maxima
>>
>>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78834 From: petronius_dexter Date: 2010-07-27
Subject: Re: A little refreshing bit of Roman culture: The "De legibus" on Di
C. Dexter Sn. Lentulo suo s.p.d.,


> "Ast quando duellum gravius discordiaeve civium
escunt, oenus ne amplius sex menses, si senatus creverit, idem iuris
quod duo consules teneto, isque ave sinistra dictus populi magister
esto. Equitatumque qui regat habeto pari iure cum eo quicumque erit
iuris disceptator." (Cicero, De legibus, III.3.9)

> I'm waiting for the translation!

In classic Latin:

"At quando bellum gravius discordiaeve civium erunt, unus ne amplius sex menses, si senatus creverit, idem iuris quod duo consules teneto, isque avi sinistra dictus populi magister esto. Equitatumque qui regat habeto pari iure cum eo quicumque erit iuris disceptator".

"Lorsqu'il y aura une guerre trop grave ou des discordes entre citoyens, qu'un homme aient le même pouvoir que les deux consuls pas plus de six mois, sur décision du sénat, et qu'il soit dit maître du peuple sous de bons augures. Et que celui qui commande aux chevaliers ait le même pouvoir que celui qui dira le droit."

Vale.

C. Petronius Dexter
Arcoiali scribebat
a. d. VI Kalendas Sextiles P. Memmio K. Fabio II coss.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78835 From: M·CVR·COMPLVTENSIS Date: 2010-07-27
Subject: Re: [BackAlley]
Talking to your keyboard?


M·CVRIATIVS·COMPLVTENSIS
PROCONSVL HISPANIAE

NOVA ROMA

-------------------------------------------

ex paucis multa, ex minimis maxima


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78836 From: Gnaeus Iulius Caesar Date: 2010-07-27
Subject: Re: [BackAlley]
No I leave talking to inanimate objects to you with your socks.

Oh do come on, try at least to be a little scathing. Imagine that you have a big pointy hat of office on your head, and someone has told you that you are incorrect. That usually did it. I know witty is beyond you, but do at least try to sharpen your mind.

Caesar

--- On Tue, 7/27/10, M·CVR·COMPLVTENSIS <complutensis@...> wrote:

> From: M·CVR·COMPLVTENSIS <complutensis@...>
> Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] [BackAlley]
> To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> Date: Tuesday, July 27, 2010, 12:10 PM
> Talking to your keyboard?
>
>
> M·CVRIATIVS·COMPLVTENSIS
> PROCONSVL HISPANIAE
>
> NOVA ROMA
>
> -------------------------------------------
>
> ex paucis multa, ex minimis maxima
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>     Nova-Roma-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com
>
>
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78837 From: gualterus_graecus Date: 2010-07-27
Subject: Re: [BackAlley]
Salvete,

I'd like to interject quickly and point out to those participating in this thread that while matters concerning impersonation (fpasquinus) and the details of the trial are legitimate objects of discussion and (heated) debate, calling each other names just cheapens the entire discussion and accomplishes nothing except to shut down meaningful communication.

Valete,

Gualterus Graecus
praetorian Quaestor

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, M·CVR·COMPLVTENSIS <complutensis@...> wrote:
>
> Sulla
>
> Thank the gods yours is not contagious......
>
>
> M·CVRIATIVS·COMPLVTENSIS
> PROCONSVL HISPANIAE
>
> NOVA ROMA
>
> -------------------------------------------
>
> ex paucis multa, ex minimis maxima
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78838 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2010-07-27
Subject: Re: [BackAlley]
Ah Quaestor,

There really isn't anything Compy can say that would affect me in the
slightest. It is like being assaulted by a butterfly. Sure it's illegal
and all, but come on, its a butterfly. No damage worthy of note.

Vale,

Sulla

On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 11:17 AM, gualterus_graecus <waltms1@...>wrote:

>
>
> Salvete,
>
> I'd like to interject quickly and point out to those participating in this
> thread that while matters concerning impersonation (fpasquinus) and the
> details of the trial are legitimate objects of discussion and (heated)
> debate, calling each other names just cheapens the entire discussion and
> accomplishes nothing except to shut down meaningful communication.
>
> Valete,
>
> Gualterus Graecus
> praetorian Quaestor
>
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com <Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com>,
> M�CVR�COMPLVTENSIS <complutensis@...> wrote:
> >
> > Sulla
> >
> > Thank the gods yours is not contagious......
> >
> >
> > M�CVRIATIVS�COMPLVTENSIS
> > PROCONSVL HISPANIAE
> >
> > NOVA ROMA
> >
> > -------------------------------------------
> >
> > ex paucis multa, ex minimis maxima
> >
>
>
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78839 From: M·CVR·COMPLVTENSIS Date: 2010-07-27
Subject: Re:
I fear that your idiocy is contagious, so I will stop talking to you.

 I remembered that there are better things in the world to do than
argue with you,

it is useless talking to a wall or to one that will not listen


M·CVRIATIVS·COMPLVTENSIS
PROCONSVL HISPANIAE

NOVA ROMA

-------------------------------------------

ex paucis multa, ex minimis maxima
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78840 From: Matt Hucke Date: 2010-07-27
Subject: Re: IT and Treasury
Salve Marce Curiate,

> He expelled? I do not remember that thing happen that way, I remember
> a few voluntary resignations.....

See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Constructive_dismissal

> Strange view of things....or stange point of view. Two people who
> tried to retain lifetime control of Religio

Retain lifetime control?

Just a few months before, Cassius and Cincinnatus had *voted* *to* *admit*
Piscinus to those Collegia. They had accepted that they were giving up control.

Piscinus, of course, immediately stabbed them in the back. How many hundreds of
counts of treason did he charge Cincinnatus Augur with? I forget the exact number.

What do the root words of "Pontifex" mean again? I'm not seeing that here.

There was absolutely no need to hound Cassius and Cincinnatus out of the
Collegia. Their enemies could have simply outvoted them. But they chose
revenge, and thus I, remaining loyal to my old friends, the *giants* on whose
shoulders you now stand, pulled the plug.

> My friends, who tired of such demagoguery, have abandoned NR can be
> counted by hundreds.

Hundreds! Wow! You're very popular.

Vale,
M. Octavius Gracchus,
Manumitted.

--
Matt Hucke (hucke@...), programmer.
Graveyards of Illinois - http://graveyards.com/
"Time is an illusion. Lunchtime, doubly so." - D. Adams
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78841 From: Cato Date: 2010-07-27
Subject: Re: [BackAlley]
Cato Complutenso sal./

A more accurate statement would be:

"Cato and Caesar, who advised the Senate of Nova Roma for the existing problems and were treated as traitors..."

Vale,

Cato



--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, M·CVR·COMPLVTENSIS <complutensis@...> wrote:
>
> > I feel the people have a right to know what's happening;
>
> Yes, sure, the people has the right to know but does he need a
> subjetive information?
>
> > ............................he and his allies expelled my friends and
> > made it so I could not possibly work for such an abhorrent organization.
>
> He expelled? I do not remember that thing happen that way, I remember
> a few voluntary resignations.....
>
> > ............they had to humiliate Cassius and Cincinnatus as well.
>
> Strange view of things....or stange point of view. Two people who
> tried to retain lifetime control of Religio against your own
> recommendations
>
> > ............................conspirators..............................................
>
> This sound a persecution mania.
>
> > Many unhappy citizens? No. Many unhappy ex-citizens. ........
>
> Here I will give you the reason.
>
> Are many the unhappy ex-citizens, especially those who have left NR
> tired of listening to the panegyrics of Sulla, who have grown tired of
> the pseudo-legal debates of Cato and Caesar, those who advised the
> Senate of Nova Roma for the existing problems and were treated as
> traitors, those who are tired of request changes in NR and only
> received the answer that NR is a private club of the founders of NR
> and a place where only those who were present at the founding of NR
> can speak and decide ....
>
>
>
> How many of your friends have left NR? 2? 3? 10? 20? And they left the
> organization as a tantrum because things were not made as they said.
>
> My friends, who tired of such demagoguery, have abandoned NR can be
> counted by hundreds.
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78842 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2010-07-27
Subject: Re: [BackAlley]
They follow this concept of the truth, Cato. The truth is what I tell you
it is. Don't you know that by now?

On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 11:31 AM, Cato <catoinnyc@...> wrote:

>
>
> Cato Complutenso sal./
>
> A more accurate statement would be:
>
> "Cato and Caesar, who advised the Senate of Nova Roma for the existing
> problems and were treated as traitors..."
>
> Vale,
>
> Cato
>
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com <Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com>,
> M�CVR�COMPLVTENSIS <complutensis@...> wrote:
> >
> > > I feel the people have a right to know what's happening;
> >
> > Yes, sure, the people has the right to know but does he need a
> > subjetive information?
> >
> > > ............................he and his allies expelled my friends and
> > > made it so I could not possibly work for such an abhorrent
> organization.
> >
> > He expelled? I do not remember that thing happen that way, I remember
> > a few voluntary resignations.....
> >
> > > ............they had to humiliate Cassius and Cincinnatus as well.
> >
> > Strange view of things....or stange point of view. Two people who
> > tried to retain lifetime control of Religio against your own
> > recommendations
> >
> > >
> ............................conspirators..............................................
> >
> > This sound a persecution mania.
> >
> > > Many unhappy citizens? No. Many unhappy ex-citizens. ........
> >
> > Here I will give you the reason.
> >
> > Are many the unhappy ex-citizens, especially those who have left NR
> > tired of listening to the panegyrics of Sulla, who have grown tired of
> > the pseudo-legal debates of Cato and Caesar, those who advised the
> > Senate of Nova Roma for the existing problems and were treated as
> > traitors, those who are tired of request changes in NR and only
> > received the answer that NR is a private club of the founders of NR
> > and a place where only those who were present at the founding of NR
> > can speak and decide ....
> >
> >
> >
> > How many of your friends have left NR? 2? 3? 10? 20? And they left the
> > organization as a tantrum because things were not made as they said.
> >
> > My friends, who tired of such demagoguery, have abandoned NR can be
> > counted by hundreds.
> >
>
>
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78843 From: Gnaeus Iulius Caesar Date: 2010-07-27
Subject: Re: [BackAlley]
Caesar Catoni sal.

Yes, far more accurate. The muffled sounds of outrage from the disbelieving crowd in the senate being heard wafting from under the bags they had jammed on their heads to avoid seeing any problems at all.

Oh, was it only last year you, I and Sulla were talking about the need for corporate compliance and the need to ensure our by-laws accurately reflected the demands of Maine state law? In response what warbling and chirping was heard from the collection of esteemed bag wearers? "Rubbish", "treason", "defend the respublica", {snoring sounds}, "all is well, ask Iunia/Cordus {insert whatever name you want}".

Yet now the very same issue is cause for a dictator? Well maybe if our noble colleagues had spent less time snorting in derision and actually thinking, there would be one less bogus reason for the dicatator. As it is had they sat up and thought and paid attention, instead of studying studiously the label inside the bag, they might have joined us then to work collectively on fixing it.

Ahhh, but it was so much more fun to accuse us of what they themselves are now ACTUALLY guilty of.

Ho hum. Life in Nova Roma and the senate. So jolly.

Optime vale


--- On Tue, 7/27/10, Cato <catoinnyc@...> wrote:

> From: Cato <catoinnyc@...>
> Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: [BackAlley]
> To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> Date: Tuesday, July 27, 2010, 12:31 PM
> Cato Complutenso sal./
>
> A more accurate statement would be:
>
> "Cato and Caesar, who advised the Senate of Nova Roma for
> the existing problems and were treated as traitors..."
>
> Vale,
>
> Cato
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78844 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2010-07-27
Subject: Re: [BackAlley]
And, I know all three of us offered any service we have to help correct
this.

I stand again in service to anyone who actually wants to fix NR, to become
more corporate complaint, and to make any effort, even using my own funds to
get the advice of an attorney to get our bylaws macronationally compliant.

Respectfully,

Sulla

On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 11:53 AM, Gnaeus Iulius Caesar <
gn_iulius_caesar@...> wrote:

>
>
> Caesar Catoni sal.
>
> Yes, far more accurate. The muffled sounds of outrage from the disbelieving
> crowd in the senate being heard wafting from under the bags they had jammed
> on their heads to avoid seeing any problems at all.
>
> Oh, was it only last year you, I and Sulla were talking about the need for
> corporate compliance and the need to ensure our by-laws accurately reflected
> the demands of Maine state law? In response what warbling and chirping was
> heard from the collection of esteemed bag wearers? "Rubbish", "treason",
> "defend the respublica", {snoring sounds}, "all is well, ask Iunia/Cordus
> {insert whatever name you want}".
>
> Yet now the very same issue is cause for a dictator? Well maybe if our
> noble colleagues had spent less time snorting in derision and actually
> thinking, there would be one less bogus reason for the dicatator. As it is
> had they sat up and thought and paid attention, instead of studying
> studiously the label inside the bag, they might have joined us then to work
> collectively on fixing it.
>
> Ahhh, but it was so much more fun to accuse us of what they themselves are
> now ACTUALLY guilty of.
>
> Ho hum. Life in Nova Roma and the senate. So jolly.
>
> Optime vale
>
> --- On Tue, 7/27/10, Cato <catoinnyc@... <catoinnyc%40gmail.com>>
> wrote:
>
> > From: Cato <catoinnyc@... <catoinnyc%40gmail.com>>
> > Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: [BackAlley]
>
> > To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com <Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com>
> > Date: Tuesday, July 27, 2010, 12:31 PM
>
> > Cato Complutenso sal./
> >
> > A more accurate statement would be:
> >
> > "Cato and Caesar, who advised the Senate of Nova Roma for
> > the existing problems and were treated as traitors..."
> >
> > Vale,
> >
> > Cato
> >
>
>
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78845 From: M·CVR·COMPLVTENSIS Date: 2010-07-27
Subject: Re: [BackAlley]
No Cato I was talking about other people, a time when you were not even
Senator.

Unfortunately the world does not rotate around your navel.


M·CVRIATIVS·COMPLVTENSIS
PROCONSVL HISPANIAE

NOVA ROMA

-------------------------------------------

ex paucis multa, ex minimis maxima


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78846 From: M·CVR·COMPLVTENSIS Date: 2010-07-27
Subject: Re: [BackAlley]
Good to know


M·CVRIATIVS·COMPLVTENSIS
PROCONSVL HISPANIAE

NOVA ROMA

-------------------------------------------

ex paucis multa, ex minimis maxima



2010/7/27 M·CVR·COMPLVTENSIS <complutensis@...>:
> No Cato I was talking about other people, a time when you were not even
> Senator.
>
> Unfortunately the world does not rotate around your navel.
>
>
> M·CVRIATIVS·COMPLVTENSIS
> PROCONSVL HISPANIAE
>
> NOVA ROMA
>
> -------------------------------------------
>
> ex paucis multa, ex minimis maxima
>
>
>
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78847 From: M·CVR·COMPLVTENSIS Date: 2010-07-27
Subject: Re:
The world revolves around Sulla, Cato and Caesar. Three minds
enlightened. The only three persons possessing the truth. The only
people able to find a solution to all problems.

We will have to start thinking about deifying them........


M·CVRIATIVS·COMPLVTENSIS
PROCONSVL HISPANIAE

NOVA ROMA

-------------------------------------------

ex paucis multa, ex minimis maxima
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78848 From: Cato Date: 2010-07-27
Subject: Re: [BackAlley]
Cato Caesari sal.

Hmmm...why yes, I believe you are correct. But don't forget the bit coming from our ex-praetor Maior - remember the "it's OK to break the law, the Romans did it all the time" pronouncement? Classic.

I will say here, Caesar, that I still have the impulse towards accepting a dictatorship for the reasons I stated earlier; I know you and many others disagree heartily.

I can only say that if Marinus is the honorable man I truly think he is, he can only recognize that he has been manipulated by others who are banking on his personal character into a position that is incredibly difficult for him.

He is being pushed by Piscinus - and others - towards a hole that is deep and wide, simply to satisfy the political cravings that drive them to disregard the fundamental elements of deliberative assembly and the authority of the Senate of Nova Roma. That they seem to be unable - and unwilling - to merely bring these items to a legally-convened Senate session is astonishing.

The restraint Senator Marinus has shown publicly is a credit to him, and I can only hope that he remains steadfast in refusing to assume any title or office that has not been legally conveyed to him by the Senate in lawful assembly gathered.

Vale,

Cato



--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Gnaeus Iulius Caesar <gn_iulius_caesar@...> wrote:
>
> Caesar Catoni sal.
>
> Yes, far more accurate. The muffled sounds of outrage from the disbelieving crowd in the senate being heard wafting from under the bags they had jammed on their heads to avoid seeing any problems at all.
>
> Oh, was it only last year you, I and Sulla were talking about the need for corporate compliance and the need to ensure our by-laws accurately reflected the demands of Maine state law? In response what warbling and chirping was heard from the collection of esteemed bag wearers? "Rubbish", "treason", "defend the respublica", {snoring sounds}, "all is well, ask Iunia/Cordus {insert whatever name you want}".
>
> Yet now the very same issue is cause for a dictator? Well maybe if our noble colleagues had spent less time snorting in derision and actually thinking, there would be one less bogus reason for the dicatator. As it is had they sat up and thought and paid attention, instead of studying studiously the label inside the bag, they might have joined us then to work collectively on fixing it.
>
> Ahhh, but it was so much more fun to accuse us of what they themselves are now ACTUALLY guilty of.
>
> Ho hum. Life in Nova Roma and the senate. So jolly.
>
> Optime vale
>
>
> --- On Tue, 7/27/10, Cato <catoinnyc@...> wrote:
>
> > From: Cato <catoinnyc@...>
> > Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: [BackAlley]
> > To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> > Date: Tuesday, July 27, 2010, 12:31 PM
> > Cato Complutenso sal./
> >
> > A more accurate statement would be:
> >
> > "Cato and Caesar, who advised the Senate of Nova Roma for
> > the existing problems and were treated as traitors..."
> >
> > Vale,
> >
> > Cato
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78849 From: Cato Date: 2010-07-27
Subject: Re:
Cato Complutensi sal.

My private cultus would make me unable to accept such an honor; although there is already at work the process of apotheosis that all members of that cultus share with the Divine :)

A nice cognomen would work, though, like "Legifer", the law writer. Or "Felix", since I'm happy - and lucky - most of the time.

Vale!

Cato

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, M·CVR·COMPLVTENSIS <complutensis@...> wrote:
>
> The world revolves around Sulla, Cato and Caesar. Three minds
> enlightened. The only three persons possessing the truth. The only
> people able to find a solution to all problems.
>
> We will have to start thinking about deifying them........
>
>
> M·CVRIATIVS·COMPLVTENSIS
> PROCONSVL HISPANIAE
>
> NOVA ROMA
>
> -------------------------------------------
>
> ex paucis multa, ex minimis maxima
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78850 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2010-07-27
Subject: Re:
Felix works for me! :)

On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 12:26 PM, Cato <catoinnyc@...> wrote:

>
>
> Cato Complutensi sal.
>
> My private cultus would make me unable to accept such an honor; although
> there is already at work the process of apotheosis that all members of that
> cultus share with the Divine :)
>
> A nice cognomen would work, though, like "Legifer", the law writer. Or
> "Felix", since I'm happy - and lucky - most of the time.
>
> Vale!
>
> Cato
>
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com <Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com>,
> M�CVR�COMPLVTENSIS <complutensis@...> wrote:
> >
> > The world revolves around Sulla, Cato and Caesar. Three minds
> > enlightened. The only three persons possessing the truth. The only
> > people able to find a solution to all problems.
> >
> > We will have to start thinking about deifying them........
> >
> >
> > M�CVRIATIVS�COMPLVTENSIS
> > PROCONSVL HISPANIAE
> >
> > NOVA ROMA
> >
> > -------------------------------------------
> >
> > ex paucis multa, ex minimis maxima
> >
>
>
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78851 From: Gnaeus Iulius Caesar Date: 2010-07-27
Subject: Re:
Somewhat exagerated ;) but you would be ideally placed were it true since you spent 12 months as consul revolving around in a circle, accomplishing nothing. You were at risk a few times of disappearing into your own black hole (yes I made sure I said black and not back).

Caesar

--- On Tue, 7/27/10, M·CVR·COMPLVTENSIS <complutensis@...> wrote:

> From: M·CVR·COMPLVTENSIS <complutensis@...>
> Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma]
> To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> Date: Tuesday, July 27, 2010, 1:21 PM
> The world revolves around Sulla, Cato
> and Caesar. Three minds
> enlightened. The only three persons possessing the truth.
> The only
> people able to find a solution to all problems.
>
> We will have to start thinking about deifying them........
>
>
> M·CVRIATIVS·COMPLVTENSIS
> PROCONSVL HISPANIAE
>
> NOVA ROMA
>
> -------------------------------------------
>
> ex paucis multa, ex minimis maxima
>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>     Nova-Roma-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com
>
>
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78852 From: gualterus_graecus Date: 2010-07-27
Subject: Re:
Salvete,

It seems to me that the thread's utility has been spent. Unless there is something productive or informative remaining to be said on any of the serious topics raised in it, I think it would be best if everyone moved along.

Valete,

Gualterus

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Gnaeus Iulius Caesar <gn_iulius_caesar@...> wrote:
>
> Somewhat exagerated ;) but you would be ideally placed were it true since you spent 12 months as consul revolving around in a circle, accomplishing nothing. You were at risk a few times of disappearing into your own black hole (yes I made sure I said black and not back).
>
> Caesar
>
> --- On Tue, 7/27/10, M·CVR·COMPLVTENSIS <complutensis@...> wrote:
>
> > From: M·CVR·COMPLVTENSIS <complutensis@...>
> > Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma]
> > To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> > Date: Tuesday, July 27, 2010, 1:21 PM
> > The world revolves around Sulla, Cato
> > and Caesar. Three minds
> > enlightened. The only three persons possessing the truth.
> > The only
> > people able to find a solution to all problems.
> >
> > We will have to start thinking about deifying them........
> >
> >
> > M·CVRIATIVS·COMPLVTENSIS
> > PROCONSVL HISPANIAE
> >
> > NOVA ROMA
> >
> > -------------------------------------------
> >
> > ex paucis multa, ex minimis maxima
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------------
> >
> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >     Nova-Roma-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com
> >
> >
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78853 From: D.O.A. Date: 2010-07-27
Subject: Re: IT and Treasury
I remember the past exactly as Octaviusm my Paterfamilias does.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Matt Hucke" <hucke@...>
To: <Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Tuesday, July 27, 2010 8:12 PM
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: IT and Treasury


> Salve Marce Curiate,
>
>> He expelled? I do not remember that thing happen that way, I remember
>> a few voluntary resignations.....
>
> See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Constructive_dismissal
>
>> Strange view of things....or stange point of view. Two people who
>> tried to retain lifetime control of Religio
>
> Retain lifetime control?
>
> Just a few months before, Cassius and Cincinnatus had *voted* *to* *admit*
> Piscinus to those Collegia. They had accepted that they were giving up
> control.
>
> Piscinus, of course, immediately stabbed them in the back. How many
> hundreds of
> counts of treason did he charge Cincinnatus Augur with? I forget the
> exact number.
>
> What do the root words of "Pontifex" mean again? I'm not seeing that
> here.
>
> There was absolutely no need to hound Cassius and Cincinnatus out of the
> Collegia. Their enemies could have simply outvoted them. But they chose
> revenge, and thus I, remaining loyal to my old friends, the *giants* on
> whose
> shoulders you now stand, pulled the plug.
>
>> My friends, who tired of such demagoguery, have abandoned NR can be
>> counted by hundreds.
>
> Hundreds! Wow! You're very popular.
>
> Vale,
> M. Octavius Gracchus,
> Manumitted.
>
> --
> Matt Hucke (hucke@...), programmer.
> Graveyards of Illinois - http://graveyards.com/
> "Time is an illusion. Lunchtime, doubly so." - D. Adams
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78854 From: petronius_dexter Date: 2010-07-27
Subject: Re: Short notice about objections received to the Senate meeting.
Ave T. Sabine!

> That is to inform that, at this time, after the meeting of the Senate called by the Consul minor and four Tribunes (except Ti. Petronius Dexter),

My name is C. Petronius Dexter.

If I am not wrong, among 30 senators, 19 have voted.
On the 19, first 17 voted "yes" for the Item III dictatorship,
but then 3 of them withdrew their vote.

So the final result is:
14 senators voted "yes" for the item III dictatorship.

It is for giving an evaluation because this session was vetoed...

Vale.

C. Petronius Dexter
tribunus Plebis Arcoiali scribebat
a. d. VI Kalendas Sextiles P. Memmio K. Fabio II coss.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78855 From: iulius sabinus Date: 2010-07-27
Subject: Re: Short notice about objections received to the Senate meeting.
AVE C> PETRONI!

--- On Tue, 7/27/10, petronius_dexter <jfarnoud94@...> wrote:

> That is to inform that, at this time, after the meeting of the Senate called by the Consul minor and four Tribunes (except Ti. Petronius Dexter),
My name is C. Petronius Dexter.>>>
 
Yes, my appologies.

If I am not wrong, among 30 senators, 19 have voted.
On the 19, first 17 voted "yes" for the Item III dictatorship,
but then 3 of them withdrew their vote.>>>
 
NR has 29 senators. My friend Popillius Laenas has ius sententiae dicendae. I sent the updated list to consuls and some of the tribuni, if I remember well, one month ago.

So the final result is:
14 senators voted "yes" for the item III dictatorship.
It is for giving an evaluation because this session was vetoed...>>>
 
I didn't count anything. Frankly I don't care. I belong to those who consider that the session is illegal.

VALE,
T. Iulius Sabinus




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78856 From: Bruno Zani Date: 2010-07-27
Subject: A little refreshing bit of Roman culture: The "De legibus" on Dictat
A. Liburnius Hadrianus Quiritibus SPD:

 "Ast quando duellum gravius discordiaeve civium escunt, oenus ne amplius sex
menses, si senatus creverit, idem iuris quod duo consules teneto, isque ave
sinistra dictus populi magister esto. Equitatumque qui regat habeto pari iure
cum eo quicumque erit iuris disceptator. " (Cicero, De legibus, III.3.9)

"At quando bellum gravius discordiaeve civium erunt, unus ne amplius sex menses,
si senatus creverit, idem iuris quod duo consules teneto, isque avi sinistra
dictus populi magister esto. Equitatumque qui regat habeto pari iure cum eo
quicumque erit iuris disceptator" .

"Lorsqu'il y aura une guerre trop grave ou des discordes entre citoyens, qu'un
homme aient le même pouvoir que les deux consuls pas plus de six mois, sur
décision du sénat, et qu'il soit dit maître du peuple sous de bons augures. Et
que celui qui commande aux chevaliers ait le même pouvoir que celui qui dira le
droit."

"Quando ci sarà una guerra troppo grave o discordia tra i cittadini, ci sia
un'uomo avente lo stesso potere che i due consoli, per non più di sei mesi, alla
discrezione del senato e sotto buoni auspici, e che egli sia detto maestro del
popolo. E che colui che  commanda i cavalieri abbia lo stesso potere che colui
che dirà il diritto."

"In the event of a seriuos war or when there is dissension among the citizens,
let it be a man having the same power than the two consuls, for no more than six
months, at the senate's discretion and under good auspices, e let him be called
master of the people. And let he who commands the horses have the same power as
he who will say what is right."

Auf Deutsch, bitte!
¡En español, por favor!

 
Curate ut valeatis.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78857 From: marcushoratius Date: 2010-07-27
Subject: OBNUNTIATIO: ALIO DIE
M. Moravius Piscinus magister Collegii Augurum Consulibus, Tribunibus, Senatoribus et Senatricibus, Civibus Novae Romae, Quiritibus s. p. d.

Upon issuing an edictum on a.d. XI Kal. Sextiles 2763 auc (July 22, 2010), Consul P. Memmius requested in Art. III that the Augures publici take the auspices on his behalf to hold a meeting of the Senate beginning on a. d. VII Kal. Sext. (26 July 2010). (Ref: Edictum Consularis below) However, auspices were not taken due to the fact that all three of the Augures publici were in attendence at the Senate where that august body was already in a session.

Consul Memmius has since attempted to convene a new session of the Senate before the previous session has officially closed, before attaining a quorum, and before any auspicium has been performed. He is not in compliance with Senate rules, nor with previous decreta pontifica and decreta augura.

The Senate's "Rules on convening the Senate," under the "Senatus Consultum on Auspicious Meetings," requires: "The Senate shall meet only after favorable auspices have been obtained for any given meeting."

Since no auspicium has yet been performed, favorable auspices cannot have been obtained as of yet. Therefore, as the Senate is not legally in session, and any actions that might be taken by Consul Memmius and a rump Senate without favorable auspices or a quorum would necessarily be void, the Consul shall have to await the outcome of a proper auspication by one of the Augures Publici.


OBNUNTIATIO

There, under the authority of the Constitution VI.B.2.b.2, I, Marcus Moravius Piscinus Augur, issue an obnuntiatio:

ALIO DIE


As stated in the Constitution VI.B.2.b.2: "To declare obnuntiatio (a declaration that unfavorable and unsolicited omens have been observed that justify a delay of a meeting of one of the comitia or the Senate)." The Senate session therefore requested by Consul P. Memmius shall have to be delayed until auspices are taken and, under Senate rules, favorable auspices are obtained.


--- In NovaRoma-Announce@yahoogroups.com, Publius Memmius Albucius <albucius_aoe@...> wrote:
>
> --------- EDICTUM on the STATEMENT relative to the PRAETORIAN ELECTIONS and the CALL of the SENATE of NOVA ROMA-------------------------------------------
>
>
>
> P. Memmius Albucius cos. patribus, collegae, magistratibus, omn.que in senatu s.d.
>
> Considering that:
>
>
> the absence of a praerogative century selected by the diribitors for the last comitia centuriata which closed last pridie nonas Quint. (July 6);
>
> the constitutional need to fill the praetorian positions;
>
> I have informed the senate and the citizens of my intent convening the senate on last June 20 (msg NRAnnounce # 2018);
>
> the meeting of the Senate, called with no previous information by the consul minor with three tribunes of the Plebs during this second part of July, has obliged me to move this scheduled session;
> quod bonum felixque sit populo romano quiritium, I edict the following and referimus ad vos, Patres conscripti:
>
> Art. 1 : Because the absence of selection of centuria praerogativa for the Comitia centuriata called on a.d. XIV Kal. Quint., the elections for praetors are hereby declared void. I present here the four still valid candidates to the Praetura (alphabetically Hon. Fabius, Galerius, Tullia and Ullerius) the apologies of our Republic for this absence of selection.
>
> Art. 2 : In order, specially, to fill as soon as possible both praetorian positions, the Senate is hereby convened for a session. Its advice and/or decision is asked, in the frame of this session, on the agenda presented in the relatio presented below ;
>
> Art. 3 : Augur Modianus, or augur Agricola or augur Piscinus are requested to take the auspices for this session, in consideration of the dates mentioned below in article 4.
>
> Art. 4 : The senate will be proposed to issue a vote on certain items, but not on other ones which are proposed to the Curia either for its information, or for discussion so that a further decision may be taken in the best environment as possible. The relatio below (art. 6) will specify the type of each of its items (information, discussion, discussion +vote) ;
>
> Art. 5 : The time table of the session is the following one, every hour being expressed for Rome:
> 5.1. Session
> Beginning: 14:00 hour, a.d. VII Kal. Sextiles 2763 auc (July 26, 2010 c.c.) ; end: 18:00 hour Kal. Sextiles (August 1st)
> 5.2. Contio
> Beginning: 15:00 hour, a.d. VII Kal. Sextiles (July 26) ; end: 15:00 hour a.d. III Kal. Sextiles (July 30)
> 5.3. Vote
> Beginning: 16:30 hour, a.d. III Kal. Sextiles (July 30); end: 16:30 hour, Kal. Sextiles (August 1st)
>
>
> Art. 6 : The senators are reminded to, and thanked for, observing the SC on the "adoption of internal regulations of the Senate (Senate closed out of sessions, moderation, no discussion when voting)" adopted a.d. III Nonas Dec. 2762 auc (Dec. 3, 2010). Its text may be consulted again at: http://www.novaroma.org/nr/Consular_report_of_December_2762_auc_session .
>
> Art. 7 : The relatio ('agenda') of the present session is the following one:
> Item I – SCU on the appointment of two praetors (discussion + vote)
> Item II – SCU on electoral tools (discussion + vote)
> Item III sq. – Possible additional items
>
>
> Art. 8 : The items mentioned in the article 6 may be completed in the following days by additional items;
>
>
> Art. 9 : The present call of the Senate is worth, towards U.S. state of Maine Law and according its relevant and applicable rules, the convening of Nova Roma inc. Board.
>
>
>
> Thanks for your attention, Senators. Have all a good session and valete omnes.
>
>
> Datum a.d. XI Kal. Sextiles 2763 auc (July 22, 2010 cc).
>
>
>
>
> P. Memmius Albucius cos.
> _________________________________________________________________
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78858 From: M·CVR·COMPLVTENSIS Date: 2010-07-27
Subject: Re: A little refreshing bit of Roman culture: The "De legibus" on Di
"Cuando haya una guerra o discordia entre los ciudadanos, que haya un hombre
que tenga el mismo poder que los dos consules, pero no por m�s de seis
meses, a discreci�n del senado y bajo buenos auspicios, y que �l sea llamado
maestro del pueblo. Y que aquel que comande a los caballeros tenga el mismo
poder que el que dice lo que es recto."


M�CVRIATIVS�COMPLVTENSIS
PROCONSVL HISPANIAE

NOVA ROMA

-------------------------------------------

ex paucis multa, ex minimis maxima


2010/7/27 Bruno Zani <reenbru@...>

>
>
> A. Liburnius Hadrianus Quiritibus SPD:
>
> "Ast quando duellum gravius discordiaeve civium escunt, oenus ne amplius
> sex
> menses, si senatus creverit, idem iuris quod duo consules teneto, isque ave
>
> sinistra dictus populi magister esto. Equitatumque qui regat habeto pari
> iure
> cum eo quicumque erit iuris disceptator. " (Cicero, De legibus, III.3.9)
>
> "At quando bellum gravius discordiaeve civium erunt, unus ne amplius sex
> menses,
> si senatus creverit, idem iuris quod duo consules teneto, isque avi
> sinistra
> dictus populi magister esto. Equitatumque qui regat habeto pari iure cum eo
>
> quicumque erit iuris disceptator" .
>
> "Lorsqu'il y aura une guerre trop grave ou des discordes entre citoyens,
> qu'un
> homme aient le m�me pouvoir que les deux consuls pas plus de six mois, sur
> d�cision du s�nat, et qu'il soit dit ma�tre du peuple sous de bons augures.
> Et
> que celui qui commande aux chevaliers ait le m�me pouvoir que celui qui
> dira le
> droit."
>
> "Quando ci sar� una guerra troppo grave o discordia tra i cittadini, ci sia
>
> un'uomo avente lo stesso potere che i due consoli, per non pi� di sei mesi,
> alla
> discrezione del senato e sotto buoni auspici, e che egli sia detto maestro
> del
> popolo. E che colui che commanda i cavalieri abbia lo stesso potere che
> colui
> che dir� il diritto."
>
> "In the event of a seriuos war or when there is dissension among the
> citizens,
> let it be a man having the same power than the two consuls, for no more
> than six
> months, at the senate's discretion and under good auspices, e let him be
> called
> master of the people. And let he who commands the horses have the same
> power as
> he who will say what is right."
>
> Auf Deutsch, bitte!
> �En espa�ol, por favor!
>
>
> Curate ut valeatis.
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78859 From: M·CVR·COMPLVTENSIS Date: 2010-07-27
Subject: Re: IT and Treasury
Salve Graccho

Parole, parole, parole soltanto parole

You are good at reconstructing the history, you do not have other bloody
tale about conspirators prosecuting the boni homines? These are really
funny.

Vale


M·CVRIATIVS·COMPLVTENSIS
PROCONSVL HISPANIAE

NOVA ROMA

-------------------------------------------

ex paucis multa, ex minimis maxima


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78860 From: Publius Memmius Albucius Date: 2010-07-27
Subject: Responsum consulare de OBNUNTIATIOne
Senatoribus s.d.



I forward to you here, for the best transparency, the obnuntiatio issued by M. Moravius Piscinus augur.



Here is below my official answer.



To support his argumentation, the augur puts forward that:



1. the auspices [I requested] were not taken due to the fact that all three of the Augures publici were in attendence at the Senate where that august body was already in a session.

2. the current session would have begun "before the previous session has officially closed before attaining a quorum, and before any auspicium has been performed. He is not in compliance with Senate rules, nor with previous decreta pontifica and decreta augura."

3. the "obnuntiatio (a declaration that unfavorable and unsolicited omens have been observed that justify a delay of a meeting of one of the comitia or the Senate)." is based on the fact ("therefore") that "favorable auspices" are not obtained.



With no need entering in details, I must state that:



1. I requested, publicly, the taking of auspices from any of the augurs

2. These auspices have not been taken and no answer brought to me to inform me on any reason that would have prevented the augurs to take them

3. The fact that the augurs were waiting that the previous "session" ends is irrelevant: the augurs just have to take their auspices for the days requested, not to presume that the presiding magistrate wass wrong that, at worst, they could check with him, which they did not.

4. The previous meeting ended on "Sunday 25 July 2010 at 00.02 CET Roma [Saturday 18.02 24 July]." (Cos CFBQ' msg Senatus - # 17105) i.e. **1,5 days before** the beginning of the current session. I had in effect carefully watched that the current session may not interfere with the previous meeting.

5. The auspices have been taken by myself, in the silence of the augurs.

6. Any taking or not of auspices may be a cause for an obnuntiatio : our Constitution speaks of "unfavorable and unsolicited omens" which auspices or default of auspices are obviously not.

7. An obnuntiatio must be issued before a session, not once the session began.



For these reasons, the so-called "obnuntiatio" is void and must not be taken in consideration. The current Senate session goes on normally.







P. Memmius Albucius cos.







> Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2010 21:41:31 +0000
> From: MHoratius@...
> To: albucius_aoe@...
> Subject: OBNUNTIATIO
>
> M. Moravius Piscinus magister Collegii Augurum Consulibus, Tribunibus, Senatoribus et Senatricibus, Civibus Novae Romae, Quiritibus s. p. d.
>
> Upon issuing an edictum on a.d. XI Kal. Sextiles 2763 auc (July 22, 2010), Consul P. Memmius requested in Art. III that the Augures publici take the auspices on his behalf to hold a meeting of the Senate beginning on a. d. VII Kal. Sext. (26 July 2010). (Ref: Edictum Consularis below) However, auspices were not taken due to the fact that all three of the Augures publici were in attendence at the Senate where that august body was already in a session.
>
> Consul Memmius has since attempted to convene a new session of the Senate before the previous session has officially closed, before attaining a quorum, and before any auspicium has been performed. He is not in compliance with Senate rules, nor with previous decreta pontifica and decreta augura.
>
> The Senate's "Rules on convening the Senate," under the "Senatus Consultum on Auspicious Meetings," requires: "The Senate shall meet only after favorable auspices have been obtained for any given meeting."
>
> Since no auspicium has yet been performed, favorable auspices cannot have been obtained as of yet. Therefore, as the Senate is not legally in session, and any actions that might be taken by Consul Memmius and a rump Senate without favorable auspices or a quorum would necessarily be void, the Consul shall have to await the outcome of a proper auspication by one of the Augures Publici.
>
>
> OBNUNTIATIO
>
> There, under the authority of the Constitution VI.B.2.b.2, I, Marcus Moravius Piscinus Augur, issue an obnuntiatio:
>
> ALIO DIE
>
>
> As stated in the Constitution VI.B.2.b.2: "To declare obnuntiatio (a declaration that unfavorable and unsolicited omens have been observed that justify a delay of a meeting of one of the comitia or the Senate)." The Senate session therefore requested by Consul P. Memmius shall have to be delayed until auspices are taken and, under Senate rules, favorable auspices are obtained.
>
>
> --- In NovaRoma-Announce@yahoogroups.com, Publius Memmius Albucius <albucius_aoe@...> wrote:
> >
> > --------- EDICTUM on the STATEMENT relative to the PRAETORIAN ELECTIONS and the CALL of the SENATE of NOVA ROMA-------------------------------------------
> >
> >
> >
> > P. Memmius Albucius cos. patribus, collegae, magistratibus, omn.que in senatu s.d.
> >
> > Considering that:
> >
> >
> > the absence of a praerogative century selected by the diribitors for the last comitia centuriata which closed last pridie nonas Quint. (July 6);
> >
> > the constitutional need to fill the praetorian positions;
> >
> > I have informed the senate and the citizens of my intent convening the senate on last June 20 (msg NRAnnounce # 2018);
> >
> > the meeting of the Senate, called with no previous information by the consul minor with three tribunes of the Plebs during this second part of July, has obliged me to move this scheduled session;
> > quod bonum felixque sit populo romano quiritium, I edict the following and referimus ad vos, Patres conscripti:
> >
> > Art. 1 : Because the absence of selection of centuria praerogativa for the Comitia centuriata called on a.d. XIV Kal. Quint., the elections for praetors are hereby declared void. I present here the four still valid candidates to the Praetura (alphabetically Hon. Fabius, Galerius, Tullia and Ullerius) the apologies of our Republic for this absence of selection.
> >
> > Art. 2 : In order, specially, to fill as soon as possible both praetorian positions, the Senate is hereby convened for a session. Its advice and/or decision is asked, in the frame of this session, on the agenda presented in the relatio presented below ;
> >
> > Art. 3 : Augur Modianus, or augur Agricola or augur Piscinus are requested to take the auspices for this session, in consideration of the dates mentioned below in article 4.
> >
> > Art. 4 : The senate will be proposed to issue a vote on certain items, but not on other ones which are proposed to the Curia either for its information, or for discussion so that a further decision may be taken in the best environment as possible. The relatio below (art. 6) will specify the type of each of its items (information, discussion, discussion +vote) ;
> >
> > Art. 5 : The time table of the session is the following one, every hour being expressed for Rome:
> > 5.1. Session
> > Beginning: 14:00 hour, a.d. VII Kal. Sextiles 2763 auc (July 26, 2010 c.c.) ; end: 18:00 hour Kal. Sextiles (August 1st)
> > 5.2. Contio
> > Beginning: 15:00 hour, a.d. VII Kal. Sextiles (July 26) ; end: 15:00 hour a.d. III Kal. Sextiles (July 30)
> > 5.3. Vote
> > Beginning: 16:30 hour, a.d. III Kal. Sextiles (July 30); end: 16:30 hour, Kal. Sextiles (August 1st)
> >
> >
> > Art. 6 : The senators are reminded to, and thanked for, observing the SC on the "adoption of internal regulations of the Senate (Senate closed out of sessions, moderation, no discussion when voting)" adopted a.d. III Nonas Dec. 2762 auc (Dec. 3, 2010). Its text may be consulted again at: http://www.novaroma.org/nr/Consular_report_of_December_2762_auc_session .
> >
> > Art. 7 : The relatio ('agenda') of the present session is the following one:
> > Item I � SCU on the appointment of two praetors (discussion + vote)
> > Item II � SCU on electoral tools (discussion + vote)
> > Item III sq. � Possible additional items
> >
> >
> > Art. 8 : The items mentioned in the article 6 may be completed in the following days by additional items;
> >
> >
> > Art. 9 : The present call of the Senate is worth, towards U.S. state of Maine Law and according its relevant and applicable rules, the convening of Nova Roma inc. Board.
> >
> >
> >
> > Thanks for your attention, Senators. Have all a good session and valete omnes.
> >
> >
> > Datum a.d. XI Kal. Sextiles 2763 auc (July 22, 2010 cc).
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > P. Memmius Albucius cos.
> > _________________________________________________________________
> > Exclu : T�l�chargez la nouvelle version de Messenger !
> > http://clk.atdmt.com/FRM/go/244627952/direct/01/
> >
>
>

_________________________________________________________________
D�couvrez Microsoft Security Essentials, l'antivirus gratuit par Microsoft
http://clk.atdmt.com/FRM/go/212688364/direct/01/

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78861 From: Matt Hucke Date: 2010-07-27
Subject: Re: OBNUNTIATIO: ALIO DIE
> OBNUNTIATIO
>
> There, under the authority of the Constitution VI.B.2.b.2, I, Marcus Moravius Piscinus Augur, issue an obnuntiatio:

I cast *Dispel* *Magic* against your *Obnuntiato*! and then follow that up the
next round with a *Cone* *of* *Cold* yielding 14d4 hit points of damage! Make
your saving throw!

M. Octavius Gracchus,
14th-level half-elf Conjurer
(chaotic good)

--
Matt Hucke (hucke@...), programmer.
Graveyards of Illinois - http://graveyards.com/
"Time is an illusion. Lunchtime, doubly so." - D. Adams
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78862 From: gualterus_graecus Date: 2010-07-27
Subject: Re: OBNUNTIATIO: ALIO DIE
Salve,

Whether a senatorial rule had been broken I do not wish to address. Rather, I would like to address the declaration of an obnuntiatio. You do realize that an obnuntiatio is an observation of unpropitious signs, correct? I must echo Albucius' responsum, point 6, where he states that it can't be an obnuntiatio since no signs were observed. Perhaps you need to reread Linderski, "The Augural Law" 2196-9 (which I presume you have in your hands since Maior long ago stated she was scanning it for the college).

But, actually, you don't even have to read Linderski, but the very passage in the constitution cited by you to see that an obnuntiatio is an unpropitious sign. Since you cite the very passage that pulls the rug from under your declaration I can only imagine that the motivation for this faux declaration was either a serious momentary lapse in memory and judgment or, perhaps, something quite unwholesome, making it more akin with the RPG parody offered by Octavius in his latest post than anything actually religious.

Finally, I would like to add that declarations of (real) obnuntiationes were historically *never* raised to interfere with a senate meeting (see Liebeschuetz, Continuity and Change in Roman Religion (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1979) 15).

Vale,

Gualterus



--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "marcushoratius" <MHoratius@...> wrote:
>
> M. Moravius Piscinus magister Collegii Augurum Consulibus, Tribunibus, Senatoribus et Senatricibus, Civibus Novae Romae, Quiritibus s. p. d.
>
> Upon issuing an edictum on a.d. XI Kal. Sextiles 2763 auc (July 22, 2010), Consul P. Memmius requested in Art. III that the Augures publici take the auspices on his behalf to hold a meeting of the Senate beginning on a. d. VII Kal. Sext. (26 July 2010). (Ref: Edictum Consularis below) However, auspices were not taken due to the fact that all three of the Augures publici were in attendence at the Senate where that august body was already in a session.
>
> Consul Memmius has since attempted to convene a new session of the Senate before the previous session has officially closed, before attaining a quorum, and before any auspicium has been performed. He is not in compliance with Senate rules, nor with previous decreta pontifica and decreta augura.
>
> The Senate's "Rules on convening the Senate," under the "Senatus Consultum on Auspicious Meetings," requires: "The Senate shall meet only after favorable auspices have been obtained for any given meeting."
>
> Since no auspicium has yet been performed, favorable auspices cannot have been obtained as of yet. Therefore, as the Senate is not legally in session, and any actions that might be taken by Consul Memmius and a rump Senate without favorable auspices or a quorum would necessarily be void, the Consul shall have to await the outcome of a proper auspication by one of the Augures Publici.
>
>
> OBNUNTIATIO
>
> There, under the authority of the Constitution VI.B.2.b.2, I, Marcus Moravius Piscinus Augur, issue an obnuntiatio:
>
> ALIO DIE
>
>
> As stated in the Constitution VI.B.2.b.2: "To declare obnuntiatio (a declaration that unfavorable and unsolicited omens have been observed that justify a delay of a meeting of one of the comitia or the Senate)." The Senate session therefore requested by Consul P. Memmius shall have to be delayed until auspices are taken and, under Senate rules, favorable auspices are obtained.
>
>
> --- In NovaRoma-Announce@yahoogroups.com, Publius Memmius Albucius <albucius_aoe@> wrote:
> >
> > --------- EDICTUM on the STATEMENT relative to the PRAETORIAN ELECTIONS and the CALL of the SENATE of NOVA ROMA-------------------------------------------
> >
> >
> >
> > P. Memmius Albucius cos. patribus, collegae, magistratibus, omn.que in senatu s.d.
> >
> > Considering that:
> >
> >
> > the absence of a praerogative century selected by the diribitors for the last comitia centuriata which closed last pridie nonas Quint. (July 6);
> >
> > the constitutional need to fill the praetorian positions;
> >
> > I have informed the senate and the citizens of my intent convening the senate on last June 20 (msg NRAnnounce # 2018);
> >
> > the meeting of the Senate, called with no previous information by the consul minor with three tribunes of the Plebs during this second part of July, has obliged me to move this scheduled session;
> > quod bonum felixque sit populo romano quiritium, I edict the following and referimus ad vos, Patres conscripti:
> >
> > Art. 1 : Because the absence of selection of centuria praerogativa for the Comitia centuriata called on a.d. XIV Kal. Quint., the elections for praetors are hereby declared void. I present here the four still valid candidates to the Praetura (alphabetically Hon. Fabius, Galerius, Tullia and Ullerius) the apologies of our Republic for this absence of selection.
> >
> > Art. 2 : In order, specially, to fill as soon as possible both praetorian positions, the Senate is hereby convened for a session. Its advice and/or decision is asked, in the frame of this session, on the agenda presented in the relatio presented below ;
> >
> > Art. 3 : Augur Modianus, or augur Agricola or augur Piscinus are requested to take the auspices for this session, in consideration of the dates mentioned below in article 4.
> >
> > Art. 4 : The senate will be proposed to issue a vote on certain items, but not on other ones which are proposed to the Curia either for its information, or for discussion so that a further decision may be taken in the best environment as possible. The relatio below (art. 6) will specify the type of each of its items (information, discussion, discussion +vote) ;
> >
> > Art. 5 : The time table of the session is the following one, every hour being expressed for Rome:
> > 5.1. Session
> > Beginning: 14:00 hour, a.d. VII Kal. Sextiles 2763 auc (July 26, 2010 c.c.) ; end: 18:00 hour Kal. Sextiles (August 1st)
> > 5.2. Contio
> > Beginning: 15:00 hour, a.d. VII Kal. Sextiles (July 26) ; end: 15:00 hour a.d. III Kal. Sextiles (July 30)
> > 5.3. Vote
> > Beginning: 16:30 hour, a.d. III Kal. Sextiles (July 30); end: 16:30 hour, Kal. Sextiles (August 1st)
> >
> >
> > Art. 6 : The senators are reminded to, and thanked for, observing the SC on the "adoption of internal regulations of the Senate (Senate closed out of sessions, moderation, no discussion when voting)" adopted a.d. III Nonas Dec. 2762 auc (Dec. 3, 2010). Its text may be consulted again at: http://www.novaroma.org/nr/Consular_report_of_December_2762_auc_session .
> >
> > Art. 7 : The relatio ('agenda') of the present session is the following one:
> > Item I – SCU on the appointment of two praetors (discussion + vote)
> > Item II – SCU on electoral tools (discussion + vote)
> > Item III sq. – Possible additional items
> >
> >
> > Art. 8 : The items mentioned in the article 6 may be completed in the following days by additional items;
> >
> >
> > Art. 9 : The present call of the Senate is worth, towards U.S. state of Maine Law and according its relevant and applicable rules, the convening of Nova Roma inc. Board.
> >
> >
> >
> > Thanks for your attention, Senators. Have all a good session and valete omnes.
> >
> >
> > Datum a.d. XI Kal. Sextiles 2763 auc (July 22, 2010 cc).
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > P. Memmius Albucius cos.
> > _________________________________________________________________
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78863 From: gualterus_graecus Date: 2010-07-27
Subject: Re: Responsum consulare de OBNUNTIATIOne
Salve,

I would like to make one minor correction here, if you don't mind. Because obnuntiationes are spontaneous events, they are not linked to a particular session through a formula (like impetrative signs are through a legum dictio) therefore the only thing that can associate an omen with a session is if it happens during the session (vinculum temporis), and not before or after.

But, this is a merely academic point since Piscinus already betrayed the fact that no signs were actually observed.

Vale,

Gualterus

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Publius Memmius Albucius <albucius_aoe@...> wrote:

...
>
> 7. An obnuntiatio must be issued before a session, not once the session began.
>
>
>
> For these reasons, the so-called "obnuntiatio" is void and must not be taken in consideration. The current Senate session goes on normally.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> P. Memmius Albucius cos.
>
>
>
>
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78864 From: deciusiunius Date: 2010-07-28
Subject: Against a dictatorship
Salvete cives,
I oppose having a dictator, whether he is legally voted in or the result of the recently held illegal meeting of the Senate—the attempted coup. It does not matter that the proposed dictator is a good and honorable man, there is no need for a dictator.

I know something about appointing dictators. I am Decius Iunius Palladius Invictus, the longest serving senator of Nova Roma. I have been a senator since the Founding of Nova Roma and I was the consul in the summer of 1999 who convened our tiny Senate to appoint Flavius Vedius Germanicus as dictator of our Republic. At that time our Republic was in real trouble, not like the contrived crisis we find ourselves in at the moment. Our governmental system was only half complete at best with no tribes or centuries and no method yet to create them. The previous fall we had held elections without having the legal mechanism as laid out in our Constitution. This called into question the legitimacy of our nascent institutions.

We were paralyzed not so much through lack of will but because the motor was only half built. In retrospect elections were held too soon, the Senate should have kept a tighter rein until the system was complete. While the dictatorship did set us aright, it created deep wounds that took years to heal—if they have. It also showed us the easy way out, which some want to try again. Never again, my friends.

Today we find ourselves in the opposite situation. The motor is built (granted it needs a tuneup but it works) but we refuse to drive it. Our governmental system is intact but we lack the will—and goodwill towards each other—to move forward and try to fix things. That is where our real problems lie.

The Senate is still able to meet and conduct the business of the state. We still have our corporate and non-profit status, we have our officers in place and a plan to appoint new praetors, yet some scream the world is ending and we need a dictator to save us.

Yes, we have problems, most notably in IT, but that does not require the extraordinary act of appointing a dictator. Is a dictator going to make people like each other and heal our differences? No, he will create deeper wounds, not just in the people of Nova Roma but in her spirit, a spirit many of us have spent years trying to foster. What we need is Concordia and goodwill towards each other and a desire and willingness to work. What we have gotten are deliberate obstructions thrown in the way of our elected officials, such as the false crisis concerning augury thrown in front of our Senior Consul. We must come together for Nova Roma and stop such games.


We have gone the way of the dictator once before. As one who lived that experience from the heart of our system, I ask, for the sake of our Republic, we never go that way again.

Valete,

Decius Iunius Palladius Invictus
Founding Senator


-------------------------------------------------------------
La Garde meurt ne se rend pas--Cambronne

J'aime l'oignon frit à l'huile, J'aime l'oignon quand il est bon...
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78865 From: Gaius Tullius Valerianus Date: 2010-07-28
Subject: In Dictātūram (Against Dictatorship)
Gaius Tullius Valerianus Germanicus omnibus in foro S.P.D.

Salvete, cives! I am opposed to having a dictator, especially
considering that the current proposal comes from an illegal meeting of the
Senate called for the purpose of attempting a coup. Even were that not the
case, the kind of crisis requiring a dictator simply does not exist in Nova
Roma at this time, and the attempt to manufacture a crisis by those
attempting the coup makes the situation worse. I would like to note that I
have respect for the man being maneuvered into accepting the office, Gnaeus
Marinus, but there is no need for a dictator.

I was fortunate enough to miss the last dictatorship, having become a
citizen during the consulship of Quintus Fabius Maximus and Marcus Minucius
Audens (the year after the Civil War and our first Dictatorship). I know
that when a dictator was last appointed, the Republic faced a very real
crisis as a result of fact that our young Republic's mechanisms were not
sufficiently well-developed yet. At that time, I am assured by all who were
present, a dictator was necessary. At this time, a dictator is not only
unnecessary, but undesirable. Especially as part of an illegal coup to
resolve a manufactured crisis, when all that is called for, really, is for
our consuls, magistrates, and all of our citizens to try to cooperate with
one another - and the good news is that from the beginning, Consul Albucius
has signaled his willingness to cooperate and work with others and even now
is keeping lines of communication open.

It is troubling to me, as a plebeian citizen, that the special
representatives that exist only to protect my interests and the interests of
all plebeians - the tribunes - have not only failed to deal with the threat
of an unnecessary dictatorship, but that 4 of the 5, with the notable
exception of the honored Gaius Petronius Dexter, have not only failed in
their duty but have apparently supported the attempted coup. Gaius Dexter
has pointed out the extreme irony of his fellow tribunes participating in an
illegal attempt to appoint a dictator - a dictator being the only office in
Rome that automatically negates a tribune's power and makes the tribunate
essentially irrelevant.

The only real problem Nova Roma is facing, outside of people refusing
to work together, is our Information Technology situation. It is a real
problem, but does not require a dictator to resolve it. That situation, in
fact, would not even exist now were it not for the previous misdeeds of some
of the very people now agitating for a dictator to solve the situation they
created, as pointed out by our illustrious former consular, M. Octavius
Gracchus, But regardless, there is a great deal of scandal already attached
to one of the proposed solutions (which involves hiring someone close to one
of our magistrates - to the tune of $10,000 - in a situation that would be
heavily scrutinized for impropriety in any normal organization). There is no
easy solution on the horizon, and the possibility of an illegally appointed
dictator forcing through such a scandalous proposal and taking away $10,000
of OUR money, citizens, upsets me.

I am against a dictatorship at this time, citizens. Unlike some here, I
am not totally against *ever *having a dictator - it is possible to imagine
crises that might require such a magistrate - but we have not yet reached
such a nadir. And if we were ever to have one, I should certainly hope that
the dictator would enter office in an honorable way, rather than under a
cloud of impropriety from an illegal senate session, inaugurated by auspices
involving botched Latin prayers that should create a *vitium *(any Latinist
among us can confirm that they prayer offered for the auspices to inaugurate
Marinus were incorrect). I believe the man who is being maneuvered into this
position, Gnaeus Equitius Marinus, is an honorable man who will honorably
refuse to be thrust into a situation smacking of impropriety and impiety.
But he, and all of us, should oppose a dictatorship at this time anyway, and
be deeply suspicious of those attempting to obstruct the normal workings of
the Republic in this way.

I have heard some say that they would almost welcome a dictator because
they are tired of the arguing and bickering in Nova Roma. And one can
imagine taking the easy way out seems attractive to some - but it is not
Roman to simply do whatever is expedient and easy. Being Roman means doing
the right thing, doing the hard thing, and hammering out our disagreements
if necessary. Handing power to a dictator and letting it be "someone else's
problem" is not Roman.

Valete, citizens. I hope all of us speak up and make our voices heard in
this important matter.


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78866 From: marcushoratius Date: 2010-07-28
Subject: a. d. V Kalendas Sextilias: The Battle of Mt. Gaurus
M. Moravius Piscinus cultoribus Deorum et omnibus salutem plurimam dicit: Optime vos omnes.

Hodie est ante diem V Kalendas Sextilias; haec dies comitialis est:

Vindolanda's Portable Roman Calendar

In July 2008 a unique discovery took place along Hadrian's Wall at Vindolanda. This was the discovery of a piece of a portable, metal, perpetual calendar used by the Roman army. It is the first of its kind discovered, and only the third portable calendar found thus far. The others were a Roman's bronze menologium, or register of months, found in 1886 at Grand, France, and a Celtic bronze tablet discovered in 1897 at Coligny, France. The Vindolanda example is a curved piece showing the month of September, presumably from a circular or semi-circular calendar. The days were counted by placing a peg in one of the holes every other day. That is, only the odd-numbered days were recorded, possibly as these were considered the fortunate days. An article on the find, with photos, can be found at http://www.dorset-archaeology.org.uk/newsletters/2008-10.pdf and also in the Jan/Feb 2009 issue of Archaeology magazine.


AUC 410 / 343 BCE: The Battle of Mt. Gaurus

[Valerius Corvinus in his third consulship] "Nowhere was there ever a general who endeared himself more to his soldiers by cheerfully sharing every duty with the humblest of his men. In the military sports when the soldiers got up contests of speed and strength among themselves he was equally ready to win or to lose, and never thought any man unworthy to be his antagonist. He showed practical kindness as circumstances required; in his language he was not less mindful of other men's liberty than of his own dignity, and what made him most popular was that he displayed the same qualities in discharging the duties of his office which he had shown as a candidate for it. Following up their commander's words, the whole army marched out of camp with extraordinary alacrity. In no battle that was ever fought did men engage with strength more equally matched, or more assured hopes of victory on both sides, or a stronger spirit of self-confidence unaccompanied, however, by any feeling of contempt for their opponents. The fighting temper of the Samnites was roused by their recent achievements and the double victory won a few days previously; the Romans on the other hand were inspired by their glorious record of four centuries of victory reaching back to the foundation of the City. But each side felt some anxiety at meeting a new and untried foe. The battle was an index to their feelings; for some time they fought so resolutely that neither line showed any signs of giving way. At length the consul, seeing that the Samnites could not be repulsed by steady fighting, determined to try the effect of a sudden shock and launched his cavalry at them. This made no impression, and as he watched them wheeling round in the narrow space between the opposing armies after their ineffective charge, having utterly failed to penetrate the enemy's line, he rode back to the front ranks of the legions, and after dismounting said: "Soldiers, this task belongs to us infantry. Come on! Wherever you see me making my way through the enemy's lines with my sword follow, and each of you do his best to cut down those in front. All that ground which is now glittering with uplifted spears you shall see cleared by a vast carnage." During these words the cavalry, at the consul's order, retired on both flanks, leaving the center clear for the legions. The consul led the charge, and slew the first man he engaged with. Fired at the sight, every man, right and left, charged straight forward and began a fight to be remembered. The Samnites did not flinch, though they were receiving more wounds than they inflicted.

"The battle had now gone on for a considerable time; there was a terrible slaughter round the Samnite standards but no signs of flight anywhere, so resolved were they that death alone should be their conqueror. The Romans began to find their strength failing through fatigue and not much daylight remained, so goaded on by rage and disappointment they flung themselves madly upon their foe. Then for the first time the Samnites were seen to be giving ground and preparing to flee; they were being taken prisoners and killed in all directions, and not many would have survived had not night put an end to what was becoming a victory rather than a battle. The Romans admitted that they had never fought with a more obstinate enemy, and when the Samnites were asked what it was that first turned them, with all their determination, to flight, they said that the eyes of the Romans looked like fire, and their faces and expression like those of madmen; it was this more than anything else which filled them with terror. This terror showed itself not only in the result of the battle but also in their hurrying away in the night. The next day the Romans took possession of their empty camp, and all the population of Capua came out there to congratulate them." ~ Titus Livius 7.33


AUC 537 / 216 BCE: Appointment of M. Fabius Buteo as Dictator to Restore the Senate

"When the senate had done their best - so far as human wisdom could do so - to make good the losses which Fortune had inflicted in such an uninterrupted series of disasters, they at last turned their attention to the emptiness of the Senate-house and the small number of those who attended the national council. There had been no revision of the roll of the senate since L. Aemilius and C. Flaminius were censors, though there had been such heavy losses amongst the senators during the last five years on the field of battle, as well as from the fatalities and accidents to which all are liable. In compliance with the unanimous wish, the subject was brought forward by the praetor, M. Aemilius, in the absence of the Dictator, who after the loss of Casilinum had rejoined the army. Sp. Carvilius spoke at considerable length about the dearth of senators, and also the very small number of citizens from whom senators could be chosen. He went on to say that for the purpose of filling up the vacancies, and also of strengthening the union between the Latins and Rome, he should strongly urge that the full citizenship be granted to two senators out of each Latin city, to be approved by the senate, and that these men should be chosen into the senate in the place of those who had died. The senate listened to these proposals with quite as much impatience as they had previously felt at the demand of the Latins. A murmur of indignation went through the House. T. Manlius in particular was heard asserting that there was even still one man of the stock to which that consul belonged who once in the Capitol threatened that he would kill with his own hand any Latin whom he saw sitting in the senate. Q. Fabius Maximus declared that no proposal had ever been mooted in the senate at a more inopportune time than this; it had been thrown out at a moment when the sympathies of their allies were wavering and their loyalty doubtful, and it would make them more restless than ever; those rash inconsiderate words uttered by one man ought to be stifled by the silence of all men. Whatever secret or sacred matter had at any time imposed silence on that House, this most of all must be concealed, buried, forgotten, considered as never having been uttered. All further allusion to the subject was accordingly suppressed. It was ultimately decided to nominate as Dictator a man who had been censor before, and was the oldest man living who had held that office, in order that the roll of senators might be revised. C. Terentius was recalled to nominate the Dictator. Leaving a garrison in Apulia he returned to Rome by forced marches, and the night after his arrival nominated, in accordance with ancient custom M. Fabius Buteo to act as Dictator for six months without any Master of the Horse.

"Accompanied by his lictors, Fabius mounted the rostra and made the following speech: "I do not approve of there being two Dictators at the same time, a thing wholly unprecedented, nor of there being a Dictator without a Master of the Horse, nor of the censorial powers being entrusted to one individual and that for the second time, nor of the supreme authority being placed in the hands of a Dictator for six months unless he has been created to wield executive powers. These irregularities may perhaps be necessary at this juncture, but I shall fix a limit to them. I shall not remove from the roll any of those whom C. Flaminius and L. Aemilius, the last censors, placed on it, I shall simply order their names to be transcribed and read out, as I do not choose to allow the power of judging and deciding upon the reputation or character of a senator to rest with any single individual. I shall fill up the places of those who are dead in such a way as to make it clear that preference is given to rank and not to persons." After the names of the old senate had been read out, Fabius began his selection. The first chosen were men who, subsequent to the censorship of L. Aemilius and C. Flaminius, had filled a curule office, but were not yet in the senate, and they were taken according to the order of their previous appointments. They were followed by those who had been aediles, tribunes of the plebs, or quaestors. Last of all came those who had not held office, but had the spoils of an enemy set up in their houses or had received a "civic crown." In this way names were added to the senatorial roll, amidst general approbation. Having completed his task he at once laid down his Dictatorship and descended from the rostra as a private citizen. He ordered the lictors to cease their attendance and mingled with the throng of citizens who were transacting their private business, deliberately idling his time away in order that he might not take the people out of the Forum to escort him home. The public interest in him, however, did not slacken through their having to wait, and a large crowd escorted him to his house." ~ Titus Livius 23.23-24


Our thought for today is from Sextus 90 and 92:

"Recognize what God is, and what that is in you which recognizes God. If you know Him by whom you were made, you will know yourself."
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78867 From: marcushoratius Date: 2010-07-28
Subject: Re: OBNUNTIATIO: ALIO DIE
Salve Gualtere

Yes, I know that obnuntiationes are based on the report of unsolicited and unpropitious signs. What you do not know is that Senator Marinus reported just such a event to me that he took as a sign.

"As you may have seen in your morning news, we had a severe thunderstorm here overnight. Four electrical power sub-stations were knocked out, resulting in a traffic mess for the DC area on this Monday morning and no power in my office earlier this morning."

This occured on 26 July, the date when Albucius scheduled his session to begin and began it without a quorum or favorable auspices. It occured in the national capital of where Nova Roma is incorporated. It was reported by a significant Senator, considering his recent appointed as Magister Populi designatus, and if there is any doubt as to its occurrance, it was in all the papers.

A rump Senate of only 12 or so Senators is not a legal session in any event, and there is no reason for Senators to attend until a proper auspicium is taken. Consul Albucius made no mention of any auspices being taken previously, not for him or by him, in his call of the Senate. Compare his own calls of the Senate to those of Consul Fabius. No call is made by the latter until after auspices are taken and the dates approved. Consul Albucius apparently considers this too inconvenient for his schedule since he has departed from the practice of all former consuls, proceding on his own schedule without awaiting reports of auspicia or simply dispensing with favorable auspicia as required by Senate rules. This is not the first time this year that auspicia oblativa have appeared and indicated problems. But these too have been ignored. When a consul attempts to hold a session of the Senate without favorable auspices, without a quorum, in contravention of our laws, then it is no surprise to me that unsolicited unfavorable signs appear.

This is not Roma antiqua, Gualtere. Roma antiqua is a model for Nova Roma, but Nova Roma has its own laws and its own traditions. They differ on some points. Our civitas is defined by our laws; laws with which, apparently, Albucius has a hard time complying. He has merely to delay his session until favorable auspices are attained during a proper auspication.

Valete
M. Moravius Piscinus


--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "gualterus_graecus" <waltms1@...> wrote:
>
> Salve,
>
> Whether a senatorial rule had been broken I do not wish to address. Rather, I would like to address the declaration of an obnuntiatio. You do realize that an obnuntiatio is an observation of unpropitious signs, correct? I must echo Albucius' responsum, point 6, where he states that it can't be an obnuntiatio since no signs were observed. Perhaps you need to reread Linderski, "The Augural Law" 2196-9 (which I presume you have in your hands since Maior long ago stated she was scanning it for the college).
>
> But, actually, you don't even have to read Linderski, but the very passage in the constitution cited by you to see that an obnuntiatio is an unpropitious sign. Since you cite the very passage that pulls the rug from under your declaration I can only imagine that the motivation for this faux declaration was either a serious momentary lapse in memory and judgment or, perhaps, something quite unwholesome, making it more akin with the RPG parody offered by Octavius in his latest post than anything actually religious.
>
> Finally, I would like to add that declarations of (real) obnuntiationes were historically *never* raised to interfere with a senate meeting (see Liebeschuetz, Continuity and Change in Roman Religion (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1979) 15).
>
> Vale,
>
> Gualterus
>
>
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "marcushoratius" <MHoratius@> wrote:
> >
> > M. Moravius Piscinus magister Collegii Augurum Consulibus, Tribunibus, Senatoribus et Senatricibus, Civibus Novae Romae, Quiritibus s. p. d.
> >
> > Upon issuing an edictum on a.d. XI Kal. Sextiles 2763 auc (July 22, 2010), Consul P. Memmius requested in Art. III that the Augures publici take the auspices on his behalf to hold a meeting of the Senate beginning on a. d. VII Kal. Sext. (26 July 2010). (Ref: Edictum Consularis below) However, auspices were not taken due to the fact that all three of the Augures publici were in attendence at the Senate where that august body was already in a session.
> >
> > Consul Memmius has since attempted to convene a new session of the Senate before the previous session has officially closed, before attaining a quorum, and before any auspicium has been performed. He is not in compliance with Senate rules, nor with previous decreta pontifica and decreta augura.
> >
> > The Senate's "Rules on convening the Senate," under the "Senatus Consultum on Auspicious Meetings," requires: "The Senate shall meet only after favorable auspices have been obtained for any given meeting."
> >
> > Since no auspicium has yet been performed, favorable auspices cannot have been obtained as of yet. Therefore, as the Senate is not legally in session, and any actions that might be taken by Consul Memmius and a rump Senate without favorable auspices or a quorum would necessarily be void, the Consul shall have to await the outcome of a proper auspication by one of the Augures Publici.
> >
> >
> > OBNUNTIATIO
> >
> > There, under the authority of the Constitution VI.B.2.b.2, I, Marcus Moravius Piscinus Augur, issue an obnuntiatio:
> >
> > ALIO DIE
> >
> >
> > As stated in the Constitution VI.B.2.b.2: "To declare obnuntiatio (a declaration that unfavorable and unsolicited omens have been observed that justify a delay of a meeting of one of the comitia or the Senate)." The Senate session therefore requested by Consul P. Memmius shall have to be delayed until auspices are taken and, under Senate rules, favorable auspices are obtained.
> >
> >
> > --- In NovaRoma-Announce@yahoogroups.com, Publius Memmius Albucius <albucius_aoe@> wrote:
> > >
> > > --------- EDICTUM on the STATEMENT relative to the PRAETORIAN ELECTIONS and the CALL of the SENATE of NOVA ROMA-------------------------------------------
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > P. Memmius Albucius cos. patribus, collegae, magistratibus, omn.que in senatu s.d.
> > >
> > > Considering that:
> > >
> > >
> > > the absence of a praerogative century selected by the diribitors for the last comitia centuriata which closed last pridie nonas Quint. (July 6);
> > >
> > > the constitutional need to fill the praetorian positions;
> > >
> > > I have informed the senate and the citizens of my intent convening the senate on last June 20 (msg NRAnnounce # 2018);
> > >
> > > the meeting of the Senate, called with no previous information by the consul minor with three tribunes of the Plebs during this second part of July, has obliged me to move this scheduled session;
> > > quod bonum felixque sit populo romano quiritium, I edict the following and referimus ad vos, Patres conscripti:
> > >
> > > Art. 1 : Because the absence of selection of centuria praerogativa for the Comitia centuriata called on a.d. XIV Kal. Quint., the elections for praetors are hereby declared void. I present here the four still valid candidates to the Praetura (alphabetically Hon. Fabius, Galerius, Tullia and Ullerius) the apologies of our Republic for this absence of selection.
> > >
> > > Art. 2 : In order, specially, to fill as soon as possible both praetorian positions, the Senate is hereby convened for a session. Its advice and/or decision is asked, in the frame of this session, on the agenda presented in the relatio presented below ;
> > >
> > > Art. 3 : Augur Modianus, or augur Agricola or augur Piscinus are requested to take the auspices for this session, in consideration of the dates mentioned below in article 4.
> > >
> > > Art. 4 : The senate will be proposed to issue a vote on certain items, but not on other ones which are proposed to the Curia either for its information, or for discussion so that a further decision may be taken in the best environment as possible. The relatio below (art. 6) will specify the type of each of its items (information, discussion, discussion +vote) ;
> > >
> > > Art. 5 : The time table of the session is the following one, every hour being expressed for Rome:
> > > 5.1. Session
> > > Beginning: 14:00 hour, a.d. VII Kal. Sextiles 2763 auc (July 26, 2010 c.c.) ; end: 18:00 hour Kal. Sextiles (August 1st)
> > > 5.2. Contio
> > > Beginning: 15:00 hour, a.d. VII Kal. Sextiles (July 26) ; end: 15:00 hour a.d. III Kal. Sextiles (July 30)
> > > 5.3. Vote
> > > Beginning: 16:30 hour, a.d. III Kal. Sextiles (July 30); end: 16:30 hour, Kal. Sextiles (August 1st)
> > >
> > >
> > > Art. 6 : The senators are reminded to, and thanked for, observing the SC on the "adoption of internal regulations of the Senate (Senate closed out of sessions, moderation, no discussion when voting)" adopted a.d. III Nonas Dec. 2762 auc (Dec. 3, 2010). Its text may be consulted again at: http://www.novaroma.org/nr/Consular_report_of_December_2762_auc_session .
> > >
> > > Art. 7 : The relatio ('agenda') of the present session is the following one:
> > > Item I – SCU on the appointment of two praetors (discussion + vote)
> > > Item II – SCU on electoral tools (discussion + vote)
> > > Item III sq. – Possible additional items
> > >
> > >
> > > Art. 8 : The items mentioned in the article 6 may be completed in the following days by additional items;
> > >
> > >
> > > Art. 9 : The present call of the Senate is worth, towards U.S. state of Maine Law and according its relevant and applicable rules, the convening of Nova Roma inc. Board.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Thanks for your attention, Senators. Have all a good session and valete omnes.
> > >
> > >
> > > Datum a.d. XI Kal. Sextiles 2763 auc (July 22, 2010 cc).
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > P. Memmius Albucius cos.
> > > _________________________________________________________________
> > >
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78868 From: C.Antonivs Date: 2010-07-28
Subject: Re: Formation of Oppidum Urbs Nova, Provincia Sarmatia - Edict 3
I, Gaius Antonius Costa, legatus pro praetore of Provincia Sarmatia,
have received an application from the citizens of the Oppidum Urbs Nova. They ask to exclude the Nizhegorodskaya oblast from the geographycal limits of the Oppidum because some citizens are going to create another Oppidum on this territory.
I approve this request. So the geographical limits of the Oppidum Urbs Nova shall include the city of Nizhniy Novgorod only.
Given under my hand, this 28th day of July, 2010 in the City of Nizhny Novgorod, Russia.
C. Antonius Costa
Legatus pro praetore
Provincia Sarmatia

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "C.Antonivs" <c.antonivscosta@...> wrote:
>
> I, Gaius Antonius Costa, legatus pro praetore of Provincia Sarmatia, in accordance with Section 3.1.1 of the Lex Fabia de Oppidis et Municipiis, having received a foedus from the following citizens,
> • Marcus Arrius Varro
> • Titus Aelius Crispinus
> • Appia Gellia Cana
> • Manius Claudius Galeo
> • Lucius Rutilius Nerva
> requesting official approval for the formation of an oppidum in the City of Nizhniy Novgorod, Russia have examined this request. I find that it meets the requirements of Section 3.1.2 of the Lex Fabia de Oppidis et Municipiis. Accordingly by virtue and authority of this edict I approve their request.
> The official name of this community shall be Oppidum Urbs Nova and the
> geographical limits of the Oppidum shall include the city of Nizhniy Novgorod and the Nizhegorodskaya oblast, Russia.
> Further, in accordance with Section 3.1.3 of the Lex Fabia de Oppidis et Municipiis I appoint Marcus Arrius Varro and Titus Aelius Crispinus to serve as provisional aediles. They are instructed to call the comitia oppidana of the Oppidum Urbs Nova and conduct therein an election for the appointment of two aediles. This election shall be held within sixty days from today. The appointment of the provisional aediles shall expire immediately upon the election of the new aediles.
> This edict is effective immediately.
> Given under my hand, this 10th day of July, 2010 in the City of Nizhny Novgorod, Russia.
> C. Antonius Costa
> Legatus pro praetore
> Provincia Sarmatia
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78869 From: marcushoratius Date: 2010-07-28
Subject: Responsum Auguris de OBNUNTIATIONE
M. Moravius Magister Collegii Augurum Consulibue et Senatoribus Senatricibusque s. p. d.

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Publius Memmius Albucius <albucius_aoe@...> wrote:
>
<snipped>
>
> 1. I requested, publicly, the taking of auspices from any of the augurs
>
> 2. These auspices have not been taken and no answer brought to me to inform me on any reason that would have prevented the augurs to take them
>

Consul Albucius did not follow procedures that were earlier agreed upon as to how to contact the Collegium Augurum. Senate rules require that favorable auspices be attained, not simply requested, before a session can be held. It has been the practice of all other Consules to attain favorable auspices before calling the Senate to assemble. Consul Memmius is apparently too impatient to await the results.


> 3. The fact that the augurs were waiting that the previous "session" ends is irrelevant: the augurs just have to take their auspices for the days requested, not to presume that the presiding magistrate wass wrong that, at worst, they could check with him, which they did not.
>

The Augures have to be informed through proper channels, which the Consul did not do, otherwise it cannot be assumed that the Augures publici would even know such a request was made.


> 4. The previous meeting ended on "Sunday 25 July 2010 at 00.02 CET Roma [Saturday 18.02 24 July]." (Cos CFBQ' msg Senatus - # 17105) i.e. **1,5 days before** the beginning of the current session. I had in effect carefully watched that the current session may not interfere with the previous meeting.
>

The Senate session was not officially closed as any Augurs were able to find, as the report of the Tribuni Plebis is still not posted. The message to which Consul Memmius refers is the original call of the Senate by Consul Fabius Buteo. It was not an official announcement that the session had closed.


> 5. The auspices have been taken by myself, in the silence of the augurs.
>

This a violation of the DECRETUM AUGURUM DE TRIPUDIO INRITO that stipulates "Consul P. Memmius Albucius, having violated augural law, is hereby disallowed from taking any further auspicia on public matters until the Collegium Augurum determines that his procedures conform to the requirements set by that body." The Constitution 1.B on Legal precedence places decreta augura above normal magisterial edicta, such as was exercised in calling the Senate. "Should a lower authority conflict with a higher authority, the higher authority shall take precedence." Therefore, as Consul Memmius, who could not take public auspices on his own without violating a previously published decretum augurum, and whereas his edictum calling the Senate conflicted with Senate rules and with decreta augura, under the Constitution his conflicting call is voided.


> 6. Any taking or not of auspices may be a cause for an obnuntiatio : our Constitution speaks of "unfavorable and unsolicited omens" which auspices or default of auspices are obviously not.
>

This statement is incorrect. Auspicia impetrativa may be favorable or unfavorable. Obnuntiationes are pronounced when auspicia oblativa, that are unsolicited auspices, occur and are unfavorable. An obnuntiatio was issued for just that reason.


> 7. An obnuntiatio must be issued before a session, not once the session began.
>

This statement is false. An obnuntiatio may be called during any procedure and bring it to a halt, even when the action is conducted by a magistrate with the highest imperium or highes potentes, as per M. Tullius Cicero, De Div. 2.32

>
>
> For these reasons, the so-called "obnuntiatio" is void and must not be taken in consideration. The current Senate session goes on normally.
>
>

The obnuntiatio is constitutional. Consul Memmius' actions are illegal, including his disregard of decreta augurum and an obnuntio.

No Senator should answer a call of the Senate when aupsices were not properly taken and favorable auspices were not attained. The obnuntiatio stands and under the Constituion the Senate session is delayed until such time as favorable auspices are attained during a properly conducted auspicium.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78870 From: Publius Ullerius Stephanus Venator Date: 2010-07-28
Subject: Re: Against a dictatorship
Salve Decius Iunius et Ave Omnes Civis;

I, too have been around awhile, but rarely near (or having interest
in) the "seat of power." My citizenship is registered as having
occurred on 1 July 1998, 78th on the rolls, with the longest lasting
ahistorical Gens Nomen, I believe.

I look back at the printout I have of the website from August of that
year and see so many names, which have passed into the mists of our
history...some for good, most for ill, to us all.

The Dictatorship of early 1999 was indeed necessary as Senator
Palladius so eloquently writes. As I recall, Vedius came in, got the
job done and left office before the six months.

Also, as Senator Palladius and others have stated so much better and
more completely than could I, our Res Publica suffers not from the
lack of proper functioning organs of governance, but from clashing
personalities.

No "Fiat Pax et Lux" from a Dictator can cure that; motivation for
change of heart must come from within.

I, too call for those involved to step back, if you all love Nova
Roma, rather than your own plans for her...

Vale et Valete

Publius Ullerius Stephanus Venator
Cives et (several offices) Emeritus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78871 From: gualterus_graecus Date: 2010-07-28
Subject: Re: OBNUNTIATIO: ALIO DIE
Salve,

Firstly, this information was not reported in your declaration for obnuntiatio; as you well know, it is not merely the occurrence but the recognition and proper reporting of an omen that counts, so your call is still invalid. However, this is a trivial point since you can resubmit the declaration with the correct information.

Secondly, and more importantly, the timing concerns me. Unless I have read something wrong, in Albucius' ML post #78367 he states that the Senate session will begin 1400 CEST July 26. This is 6 hours ahead of EDT, which means 8AM on July 26th in Washington DC. If the storms happened "overnight" then they happened before the session began and therefore are completely irrelevant. Unless there is any clear evidence that the observed storms happened after 8AM then we're back at square one with no omens and no obnuntiatio.

Vale,

Gualterus

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "marcushoratius" <MHoratius@...> wrote:
>
> Salve Gualtere
>
> Yes, I know that obnuntiationes are based on the report of unsolicited and unpropitious signs. What you do not know is that Senator Marinus reported just such a event to me that he took as a sign.
>
> "As you may have seen in your morning news, we had a severe thunderstorm here overnight. Four electrical power sub-stations were knocked out, resulting in a traffic mess for the DC area on this Monday morning and no power in my office earlier this morning."
>
> This occured on 26 July, the date when Albucius scheduled his session to begin and began it without a quorum or favorable auspices. It occured in the national capital of where Nova Roma is incorporated. It was reported by a significant Senator, considering his recent appointed as Magister Populi designatus, and if there is any doubt as to its occurrance, it was in all the papers.
>
> A rump Senate of only 12 or so Senators is not a legal session in any event, and there is no reason for Senators to attend until a proper auspicium is taken. Consul Albucius made no mention of any auspices being taken previously, not for him or by him, in his call of the Senate. Compare his own calls of the Senate to those of Consul Fabius. No call is made by the latter until after auspices are taken and the dates approved. Consul Albucius apparently considers this too inconvenient for his schedule since he has departed from the practice of all former consuls, proceding on his own schedule without awaiting reports of auspicia or simply dispensing with favorable auspicia as required by Senate rules. This is not the first time this year that auspicia oblativa have appeared and indicated problems. But these too have been ignored. When a consul attempts to hold a session of the Senate without favorable auspices, without a quorum, in contravention of our laws, then it is no surprise to me that unsolicited unfavorable signs appear.
>
> This is not Roma antiqua, Gualtere. Roma antiqua is a model for Nova Roma, but Nova Roma has its own laws and its own traditions. They differ on some points. Our civitas is defined by our laws; laws with which, apparently, Albucius has a hard time complying. He has merely to delay his session until favorable auspices are attained during a proper auspication.
>
> Valete
> M. Moravius Piscinus
>
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "gualterus_graecus" <waltms1@> wrote:
> >
> > Salve,
> >
> > Whether a senatorial rule had been broken I do not wish to address. Rather, I would like to address the declaration of an obnuntiatio. You do realize that an obnuntiatio is an observation of unpropitious signs, correct? I must echo Albucius' responsum, point 6, where he states that it can't be an obnuntiatio since no signs were observed. Perhaps you need to reread Linderski, "The Augural Law" 2196-9 (which I presume you have in your hands since Maior long ago stated she was scanning it for the college).
> >
> > But, actually, you don't even have to read Linderski, but the very passage in the constitution cited by you to see that an obnuntiatio is an unpropitious sign. Since you cite the very passage that pulls the rug from under your declaration I can only imagine that the motivation for this faux declaration was either a serious momentary lapse in memory and judgment or, perhaps, something quite unwholesome, making it more akin with the RPG parody offered by Octavius in his latest post than anything actually religious.
> >
> > Finally, I would like to add that declarations of (real) obnuntiationes were historically *never* raised to interfere with a senate meeting (see Liebeschuetz, Continuity and Change in Roman Religion (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1979) 15).
> >
> > Vale,
> >
> > Gualterus
> >
> >
> >
> > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "marcushoratius" <MHoratius@> wrote:
> > >
> > > M. Moravius Piscinus magister Collegii Augurum Consulibus, Tribunibus, Senatoribus et Senatricibus, Civibus Novae Romae, Quiritibus s. p. d.
> > >
> > > Upon issuing an edictum on a.d. XI Kal. Sextiles 2763 auc (July 22, 2010), Consul P. Memmius requested in Art. III that the Augures publici take the auspices on his behalf to hold a meeting of the Senate beginning on a. d. VII Kal. Sext. (26 July 2010). (Ref: Edictum Consularis below) However, auspices were not taken due to the fact that all three of the Augures publici were in attendence at the Senate where that august body was already in a session.
> > >
> > > Consul Memmius has since attempted to convene a new session of the Senate before the previous session has officially closed, before attaining a quorum, and before any auspicium has been performed. He is not in compliance with Senate rules, nor with previous decreta pontifica and decreta augura.
> > >
> > > The Senate's "Rules on convening the Senate," under the "Senatus Consultum on Auspicious Meetings," requires: "The Senate shall meet only after favorable auspices have been obtained for any given meeting."
> > >
> > > Since no auspicium has yet been performed, favorable auspices cannot have been obtained as of yet. Therefore, as the Senate is not legally in session, and any actions that might be taken by Consul Memmius and a rump Senate without favorable auspices or a quorum would necessarily be void, the Consul shall have to await the outcome of a proper auspication by one of the Augures Publici.
> > >
> > >
> > > OBNUNTIATIO
> > >
> > > There, under the authority of the Constitution VI.B.2.b.2, I, Marcus Moravius Piscinus Augur, issue an obnuntiatio:
> > >
> > > ALIO DIE
> > >
> > >
> > > As stated in the Constitution VI.B.2.b.2: "To declare obnuntiatio (a declaration that unfavorable and unsolicited omens have been observed that justify a delay of a meeting of one of the comitia or the Senate)." The Senate session therefore requested by Consul P. Memmius shall have to be delayed until auspices are taken and, under Senate rules, favorable auspices are obtained.
> > >
> > >
> > > --- In NovaRoma-Announce@yahoogroups.com, Publius Memmius Albucius <albucius_aoe@> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > --------- EDICTUM on the STATEMENT relative to the PRAETORIAN ELECTIONS and the CALL of the SENATE of NOVA ROMA-------------------------------------------
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > P. Memmius Albucius cos. patribus, collegae, magistratibus, omn.que in senatu s.d.
> > > >
> > > > Considering that:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > the absence of a praerogative century selected by the diribitors for the last comitia centuriata which closed last pridie nonas Quint. (July 6);
> > > >
> > > > the constitutional need to fill the praetorian positions;
> > > >
> > > > I have informed the senate and the citizens of my intent convening the senate on last June 20 (msg NRAnnounce # 2018);
> > > >
> > > > the meeting of the Senate, called with no previous information by the consul minor with three tribunes of the Plebs during this second part of July, has obliged me to move this scheduled session;
> > > > quod bonum felixque sit populo romano quiritium, I edict the following and referimus ad vos, Patres conscripti:
> > > >
> > > > Art. 1 : Because the absence of selection of centuria praerogativa for the Comitia centuriata called on a.d. XIV Kal. Quint., the elections for praetors are hereby declared void. I present here the four still valid candidates to the Praetura (alphabetically Hon. Fabius, Galerius, Tullia and Ullerius) the apologies of our Republic for this absence of selection.
> > > >
> > > > Art. 2 : In order, specially, to fill as soon as possible both praetorian positions, the Senate is hereby convened for a session. Its advice and/or decision is asked, in the frame of this session, on the agenda presented in the relatio presented below ;
> > > >
> > > > Art. 3 : Augur Modianus, or augur Agricola or augur Piscinus are requested to take the auspices for this session, in consideration of the dates mentioned below in article 4.
> > > >
> > > > Art. 4 : The senate will be proposed to issue a vote on certain items, but not on other ones which are proposed to the Curia either for its information, or for discussion so that a further decision may be taken in the best environment as possible. The relatio below (art. 6) will specify the type of each of its items (information, discussion, discussion +vote) ;
> > > >
> > > > Art. 5 : The time table of the session is the following one, every hour being expressed for Rome:
> > > > 5.1. Session
> > > > Beginning: 14:00 hour, a.d. VII Kal. Sextiles 2763 auc (July 26, 2010 c.c.) ; end: 18:00 hour Kal. Sextiles (August 1st)
> > > > 5.2. Contio
> > > > Beginning: 15:00 hour, a.d. VII Kal. Sextiles (July 26) ; end: 15:00 hour a.d. III Kal. Sextiles (July 30)
> > > > 5.3. Vote
> > > > Beginning: 16:30 hour, a.d. III Kal. Sextiles (July 30); end: 16:30 hour, Kal. Sextiles (August 1st)
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Art. 6 : The senators are reminded to, and thanked for, observing the SC on the "adoption of internal regulations of the Senate (Senate closed out of sessions, moderation, no discussion when voting)" adopted a.d. III Nonas Dec. 2762 auc (Dec. 3, 2010). Its text may be consulted again at: http://www.novaroma.org/nr/Consular_report_of_December_2762_auc_session .
> > > >
> > > > Art. 7 : The relatio ('agenda') of the present session is the following one:
> > > > Item I – SCU on the appointment of two praetors (discussion + vote)
> > > > Item II – SCU on electoral tools (discussion + vote)
> > > > Item III sq. – Possible additional items
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Art. 8 : The items mentioned in the article 6 may be completed in the following days by additional items;
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Art. 9 : The present call of the Senate is worth, towards U.S. state of Maine Law and according its relevant and applicable rules, the convening of Nova Roma inc. Board.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Thanks for your attention, Senators. Have all a good session and valete omnes.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Datum a.d. XI Kal. Sextiles 2763 auc (July 22, 2010 cc).
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > P. Memmius Albucius cos.
> > > > _________________________________________________________________
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78872 From: Cato Date: 2010-07-28
Subject: Re: OBNUNTIATIO: ALIO DIE
Cato Piscino omnibusque in foro SPD.

Piscinus, if Senator Marinus himself reported lightning striking so violently, did you not consider that it might be a sign to *him* from Iuppiter O.M. *not* to assume the title "dictator" under the circumstances? That maybe it has nothing to do with *you* and *your* plans?

Sometimes you have to look beyond yourself, Piscinus, and actually look at the world around you. This, I think, may be exactly why in ancient Rome augurs were *not allowed* to take the auspices. Too wrapped up in their own desires and needs to be truly focused or impartial.

In the event, your pronouncement, like so many others of yours, has been proven to be groundless and void using intelligence and fact, rather than fear and wishful thinking. Thank (the) God(s) we have an actual scholar among us.



Now, I'll tell you all what happened to me this morning in Central Park. I got up early this morning to exercise (!) and I was finishing my rollerblading laps around the Sheep Meadow and went rolling on up to sit by The Reservoir to relax before coming back home here. I was sitting on the grass, listening to the sounds of the city waking up around me outside the Park, watching a few morning joggers, being absolutely quiet.

I was thinking about the mess the Respublica is in and I said aloud, half serious, "Could someone please tell me if we really need a dictator or not!"

Just a few seconds later, I heard a whole racket coming from behind me on the right, and a flock of crows shot out of the woods, being chased by a hawk - it might have been Pale Male, who lives on Fifth Avenue, but I don't know if it was him or one of his kids - and they flew over the Reservoir on my right towards the center of the Park.

Suddenly, the hawk broke out of his pursuit and dove straight down at the Reservoir and came up with a fish flapping in his mouth; he carried the struggling fish for a while but then dumped it, letting it fall into the woods that run next to the path that runs around the Reservoir.

A couple of people (joggers) and I went looking to see if we could find it, but by the time we did it was almost dead so we didn't want to touch it. Although I admit my first thought was "mmmm, branzino!"

Meanwhile Pale Male (for lack of any other identification) was wheeling across the sky over the Reservoir directly in front of us, calling out excitedly and soaring and diving in what seemed like sheer joy, the sun shining on him and making him look like he was made of pure gold.

It was beautiful, and I'm not one who really gets all "woooo"-ish about nature. That's why I live where I do - if I see a bunch of trees all standing together in one place I figure they're up to something no good.

I dunno if any of that means anything but it was certainly an eventful morning.

Vale,

Cato
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78873 From: Robert Date: 2010-07-28
Subject: Re: [BackAlley] Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: OBNUNTIATIO: ALIO DIE
Or maybe it's a warning to marinus if he tries to become dictator illegally that there could be repercussions to him personally both inside and outside the organization?

Vale

Sulla

Sent from my iPhone

On Jul 28, 2010, at 5:32 AM, Matt Hucke <hucke@...> wrote:

>
> > "As you may have seen in your morning news, we had a severe thunderstorm
> > here overnight. Four electrical power sub-stations were knocked out,
> > resulting in a traffic mess for the DC area on this Monday morning
> > and no power in my office earlier this morning."
> >
> > This occured on 26 July, the date when Albucius scheduled his session to begin and
> > began it without a quorum or favorable auspices. It occured in the national
> > capital of where Nova Roma is incorporated.
>
> There is only one way in which Washington DC is at all significant to Nova Roma.
>
> A few short miles from that city is the home of Lucius Equitius Cincinnatus
> Augur, who was eliminated by you two years ago. Maybe the omen happened near
> the home of the *true* senior augur so that he could sense the gods' disapproval
> of the conspirators who forced him out, and whose nefarious plan entered its
> next phase only days before.
>
> Was not July 26 also the day when you sent out your call to the Lictors to
> witness the appointment of a dictator, even though no Tribune or Consul had yet
> produced Senate results appointing him thus? And we haven't seen those Lictors
> posting yet - was it because of the flood rendering the would-be dictator
> unavailable? Hmmm.... the best laid schemes of mice and false priests go oft
> awry, it would seem.
>
> But let's look beyond Washington and see what else happened while the wicked
> plot was in progress.
>
> The American Capital of Nova Roma for most of its history could be more
> accurately said to be either Wells, Maine, where the PO Box was located, or
> Chicago, where the server was located.
>
> Considering that the web site was the most continuously successful feature of
> Nova Roma for many years, I think Chicago has a better claim to be the capital
> than either Washington or the PO Box does.
>
> Saturday, while you were voting on appointing a dictator after having improperly
> inserted the item at the *end* of the debate period, the Chicago area was beset
> by severe flooding, with roads in the western suburbs under four feet of water
> in several places. In one location, the water was eight feet deep, and one
> driver drowned and was found a few days later, after the water receded.
>
> Also on Sunday of this week, I reformatted the disks of the server formerly
> known as nyarlathotep.cynico.net, the one that housed Nova Roma during much of
> its existence, simply because I want to use the server for something else (I
> replaced FreeBSD 5.2 with Ubuntu Linux 10.4 in order to set up a temporary
> virtual mail server for one of my employers). In doing so, I destroyed the
> files that had once constituted the live Nova Roma web site. Wasn't that the
> day the irregular Senate session ended? Probably a bad omen for the former
> server to be obliterated during a senate call that was ostensibly about a web
> site overhaul, no?
>
> It also means that, as of this week, all your web site eggs are in one basket
> because I no longer have a recent backup - so whatever you do don't cause a
> natural disaster in Sweden!
>
> I'm sure that we can find lots of towns with a connection to NR where bad things
> happen. I'm sure you can find an evil omen in the Google for every hour of
> every day of every year, when you're so very eager to block a lawfully elected
> consul.
>
> Vale,
> M. Octavius Gracchus,
> proud peregrinus,
> keeping my servers dry.
>
> --
> Matt Hucke (hucke@...), programmer.
> Graveyards of Illinois - http://graveyards.com/
> "Time is an illusion. Lunchtime, doubly so." - D. Adams
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78874 From: Matt Hucke Date: 2010-07-28
Subject: Re: Responsum Auguris de OBNUNTIATIONE
On 07/28/2010 04:47 AM, marcushoratius wrote:
> M. Moravius Magister Collegii Augurum Consulibue et Senatoribus Senatricibusque s. p. d.

> Consul Albucius did not follow procedures that were earlier agreed upon as to how to contact the Collegium Augurum. Senate rules require that favorable auspices be attained, not simply requested, before a session can be held. It has been the practice of all other Consules to attain favorable auspices before calling the Senate to assemble. Consul Memmius is apparently too impatient to await the results.

So, he *requested* them, by your own admission, but the so-called augurs did not
*provide* them, and that's somehow the Consul's fault.

Your ethics are abominable. Is it any wonder Nova Roma went into a nose-dive
when you took the reins?

Vale,
M. Octavius Gracchus,
Consular, who worked with an Augurs,
who spent more time *doing* his *duty*
than trying to blame his failures on others.
Ex-Citizen.

--
Matt Hucke (hucke@...), programmer.
Graveyards of Illinois - http://graveyards.com/
"Time is an illusion. Lunchtime, doubly so." - D. Adams
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78875 From: Matt Hucke Date: 2010-07-28
Subject: Re: OBNUNTIATIO: ALIO DIE
> "As you may have seen in your morning news, we had a severe thunderstorm
> here overnight. Four electrical power sub-stations were knocked out,
> resulting in a traffic mess for the DC area on this Monday morning
> and no power in my office earlier this morning."
>
> This occured on 26 July, the date when Albucius scheduled his session to begin and
> began it without a quorum or favorable auspices. It occured in the national
> capital of where Nova Roma is incorporated.

There is only one way in which Washington DC is at all significant to Nova Roma.

A few short miles from that city is the home of Lucius Equitius Cincinnatus
Augur, who was eliminated by you two years ago. Maybe the omen happened near
the home of the *true* senior augur so that he could sense the gods' disapproval
of the conspirators who forced him out, and whose nefarious plan entered its
next phase only days before.

Was not July 26 also the day when you sent out your call to the Lictors to
witness the appointment of a dictator, even though no Tribune or Consul had yet
produced Senate results appointing him thus? And we haven't seen those Lictors
posting yet - was it because of the flood rendering the would-be dictator
unavailable? Hmmm.... the best laid schemes of mice and false priests go oft
awry, it would seem.

But let's look beyond Washington and see what else happened while the wicked
plot was in progress.

The American Capital of Nova Roma for most of its history could be more
accurately said to be either Wells, Maine, where the PO Box was located, or
Chicago, where the server was located.

Considering that the web site was the most continuously successful feature of
Nova Roma for many years, I think Chicago has a better claim to be the capital
than either Washington or the PO Box does.

Saturday, while you were voting on appointing a dictator after having improperly
inserted the item at the *end* of the debate period, the Chicago area was beset
by severe flooding, with roads in the western suburbs under four feet of water
in several places. In one location, the water was eight feet deep, and one
driver drowned and was found a few days later, after the water receded.

Also on Sunday of this week, I reformatted the disks of the server formerly
known as nyarlathotep.cynico.net, the one that housed Nova Roma during much of
its existence, simply because I want to use the server for something else (I
replaced FreeBSD 5.2 with Ubuntu Linux 10.4 in order to set up a temporary
virtual mail server for one of my employers). In doing so, I destroyed the
files that had once constituted the live Nova Roma web site. Wasn't that the
day the irregular Senate session ended? Probably a bad omen for the former
server to be obliterated during a senate call that was ostensibly about a web
site overhaul, no?

It also means that, as of this week, all your web site eggs are in one basket
because I no longer have a recent backup - so whatever you do don't cause a
natural disaster in Sweden!

I'm sure that we can find lots of towns with a connection to NR where bad things
happen. I'm sure you can find an evil omen in the Google for every hour of
every day of every year, when you're so very eager to block a lawfully elected
consul.

Vale,
M. Octavius Gracchus,
proud peregrinus,
keeping my servers dry.

--
Matt Hucke (hucke@...), programmer.
Graveyards of Illinois - http://graveyards.com/
"Time is an illusion. Lunchtime, doubly so." - D. Adams
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78876 From: C. Curius Saturninus Date: 2010-07-28
Subject: family-trees of late republican nobility
Salvete omnes,

I thought that this might interest some people here. For the past few months I have been working with family-trees of late republic -era nobility. Here is the first result of this work. It's a combined chart of family-trees of families who had three or more consuls between 150 - 50 BCE, plus some other families as well. I must caution you that this is only a first draft, a work-in-progress, and not a single detail of it should be trusted blindly. There is still *a lot* work to be done, in a way this is only a beginning of my research. But because it gives an unique overall view to the families and their relationships even at this preliminary stage, I thought to share it here with you.

If the attachment doesn't get past Yahoo barriers, please don't hesitate to write to me and ask a copy of it. Also, should you notice mistakes or should you have an additional information, please drop me a mail where you present your sources and I'll correct the map.

Valete,


C. Curius Saturninus
(Mikko Sillanpää)

Rector Academia Thules ad Studia Romana Antiqua et Nova
Senator - Legatus Pro Praetore Provinciae Thules

e-mail: c.curius@...
www.academiathules.org
thule.novaroma.org



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78877 From: gualterus_graecus Date: 2010-07-28
Subject: Re: OBNUNTIATIO: ALIO DIE
Salve Piscine,

I don't know why this didn't occur to me while writing my post early this morning (I'll blame the beer ;), but aside from the timing issue, since it was by your own admission not you or another augur who observed the omen, it is not automatically binding. What happens in this case, as you should know, is that the individual, Marinus in this case, reports the omen to the presiding magistrate who then chooses whether to accept or ignore the omen. The discretion of the presiding magistrate doesn't apply only if the omen is observed by an augur, and that is *during* the session.

Vale,

Gualterus

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "gualterus_graecus" <waltms1@...> wrote:
>
> Salve,
>
> Firstly, this information was not reported in your declaration for obnuntiatio; as you well know, it is not merely the occurrence but the recognition and proper reporting of an omen that counts, so your call is still invalid. However, this is a trivial point since you can resubmit the declaration with the correct information.
>
> Secondly, and more importantly, the timing concerns me. Unless I have read something wrong, in Albucius' ML post #78367 he states that the Senate session will begin 1400 CEST July 26. This is 6 hours ahead of EDT, which means 8AM on July 26th in Washington DC. If the storms happened "overnight" then they happened before the session began and therefore are completely irrelevant. Unless there is any clear evidence that the observed storms happened after 8AM then we're back at square one with no omens and no obnuntiatio.
>
> Vale,
>
> Gualterus
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "marcushoratius" <MHoratius@> wrote:
> >
> > Salve Gualtere
> >
> > Yes, I know that obnuntiationes are based on the report of unsolicited and unpropitious signs. What you do not know is that Senator Marinus reported just such a event to me that he took as a sign.
> >
> > "As you may have seen in your morning news, we had a severe thunderstorm here overnight. Four electrical power sub-stations were knocked out, resulting in a traffic mess for the DC area on this Monday morning and no power in my office earlier this morning."
> >
> > This occured on 26 July, the date when Albucius scheduled his session to begin and began it without a quorum or favorable auspices. It occured in the national capital of where Nova Roma is incorporated. It was reported by a significant Senator, considering his recent appointed as Magister Populi designatus, and if there is any doubt as to its occurrance, it was in all the papers.
> >
> > A rump Senate of only 12 or so Senators is not a legal session in any event, and there is no reason for Senators to attend until a proper auspicium is taken. Consul Albucius made no mention of any auspices being taken previously, not for him or by him, in his call of the Senate. Compare his own calls of the Senate to those of Consul Fabius. No call is made by the latter until after auspices are taken and the dates approved. Consul Albucius apparently considers this too inconvenient for his schedule since he has departed from the practice of all former consuls, proceding on his own schedule without awaiting reports of auspicia or simply dispensing with favorable auspicia as required by Senate rules. This is not the first time this year that auspicia oblativa have appeared and indicated problems. But these too have been ignored. When a consul attempts to hold a session of the Senate without favorable auspices, without a quorum, in contravention of our laws, then it is no surprise to me that unsolicited unfavorable signs appear.
> >
> > This is not Roma antiqua, Gualtere. Roma antiqua is a model for Nova Roma, but Nova Roma has its own laws and its own traditions. They differ on some points. Our civitas is defined by our laws; laws with which, apparently, Albucius has a hard time complying. He has merely to delay his session until favorable auspices are attained during a proper auspication.
> >
> > Valete
> > M. Moravius Piscinus
> >
> >
> > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "gualterus_graecus" <waltms1@> wrote:
> > >
> > > Salve,
> > >
> > > Whether a senatorial rule had been broken I do not wish to address. Rather, I would like to address the declaration of an obnuntiatio. You do realize that an obnuntiatio is an observation of unpropitious signs, correct? I must echo Albucius' responsum, point 6, where he states that it can't be an obnuntiatio since no signs were observed. Perhaps you need to reread Linderski, "The Augural Law" 2196-9 (which I presume you have in your hands since Maior long ago stated she was scanning it for the college).
> > >
> > > But, actually, you don't even have to read Linderski, but the very passage in the constitution cited by you to see that an obnuntiatio is an unpropitious sign. Since you cite the very passage that pulls the rug from under your declaration I can only imagine that the motivation for this faux declaration was either a serious momentary lapse in memory and judgment or, perhaps, something quite unwholesome, making it more akin with the RPG parody offered by Octavius in his latest post than anything actually religious.
> > >
> > > Finally, I would like to add that declarations of (real) obnuntiationes were historically *never* raised to interfere with a senate meeting (see Liebeschuetz, Continuity and Change in Roman Religion (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1979) 15).
> > >
> > > Vale,
> > >
> > > Gualterus
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "marcushoratius" <MHoratius@> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > M. Moravius Piscinus magister Collegii Augurum Consulibus, Tribunibus, Senatoribus et Senatricibus, Civibus Novae Romae, Quiritibus s. p. d.
> > > >
> > > > Upon issuing an edictum on a.d. XI Kal. Sextiles 2763 auc (July 22, 2010), Consul P. Memmius requested in Art. III that the Augures publici take the auspices on his behalf to hold a meeting of the Senate beginning on a. d. VII Kal. Sext. (26 July 2010). (Ref: Edictum Consularis below) However, auspices were not taken due to the fact that all three of the Augures publici were in attendence at the Senate where that august body was already in a session.
> > > >
> > > > Consul Memmius has since attempted to convene a new session of the Senate before the previous session has officially closed, before attaining a quorum, and before any auspicium has been performed. He is not in compliance with Senate rules, nor with previous decreta pontifica and decreta augura.
> > > >
> > > > The Senate's "Rules on convening the Senate," under the "Senatus Consultum on Auspicious Meetings," requires: "The Senate shall meet only after favorable auspices have been obtained for any given meeting."
> > > >
> > > > Since no auspicium has yet been performed, favorable auspices cannot have been obtained as of yet. Therefore, as the Senate is not legally in session, and any actions that might be taken by Consul Memmius and a rump Senate without favorable auspices or a quorum would necessarily be void, the Consul shall have to await the outcome of a proper auspication by one of the Augures Publici.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > OBNUNTIATIO
> > > >
> > > > There, under the authority of the Constitution VI.B.2.b.2, I, Marcus Moravius Piscinus Augur, issue an obnuntiatio:
> > > >
> > > > ALIO DIE
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > As stated in the Constitution VI.B.2.b.2: "To declare obnuntiatio (a declaration that unfavorable and unsolicited omens have been observed that justify a delay of a meeting of one of the comitia or the Senate)." The Senate session therefore requested by Consul P. Memmius shall have to be delayed until auspices are taken and, under Senate rules, favorable auspices are obtained.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --- In NovaRoma-Announce@yahoogroups.com, Publius Memmius Albucius <albucius_aoe@> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > --------- EDICTUM on the STATEMENT relative to the PRAETORIAN ELECTIONS and the CALL of the SENATE of NOVA ROMA-------------------------------------------
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > P. Memmius Albucius cos. patribus, collegae, magistratibus, omn.que in senatu s.d.
> > > > >
> > > > > Considering that:
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > the absence of a praerogative century selected by the diribitors for the last comitia centuriata which closed last pridie nonas Quint. (July 6);
> > > > >
> > > > > the constitutional need to fill the praetorian positions;
> > > > >
> > > > > I have informed the senate and the citizens of my intent convening the senate on last June 20 (msg NRAnnounce # 2018);
> > > > >
> > > > > the meeting of the Senate, called with no previous information by the consul minor with three tribunes of the Plebs during this second part of July, has obliged me to move this scheduled session;
> > > > > quod bonum felixque sit populo romano quiritium, I edict the following and referimus ad vos, Patres conscripti:
> > > > >
> > > > > Art. 1 : Because the absence of selection of centuria praerogativa for the Comitia centuriata called on a.d. XIV Kal. Quint., the elections for praetors are hereby declared void. I present here the four still valid candidates to the Praetura (alphabetically Hon. Fabius, Galerius, Tullia and Ullerius) the apologies of our Republic for this absence of selection.
> > > > >
> > > > > Art. 2 : In order, specially, to fill as soon as possible both praetorian positions, the Senate is hereby convened for a session. Its advice and/or decision is asked, in the frame of this session, on the agenda presented in the relatio presented below ;
> > > > >
> > > > > Art. 3 : Augur Modianus, or augur Agricola or augur Piscinus are requested to take the auspices for this session, in consideration of the dates mentioned below in article 4.
> > > > >
> > > > > Art. 4 : The senate will be proposed to issue a vote on certain items, but not on other ones which are proposed to the Curia either for its information, or for discussion so that a further decision may be taken in the best environment as possible. The relatio below (art. 6) will specify the type of each of its items (information, discussion, discussion +vote) ;
> > > > >
> > > > > Art. 5 : The time table of the session is the following one, every hour being expressed for Rome:
> > > > > 5.1. Session
> > > > > Beginning: 14:00 hour, a.d. VII Kal. Sextiles 2763 auc (July 26, 2010 c.c.) ; end: 18:00 hour Kal. Sextiles (August 1st)
> > > > > 5.2. Contio
> > > > > Beginning: 15:00 hour, a.d. VII Kal. Sextiles (July 26) ; end: 15:00 hour a.d. III Kal. Sextiles (July 30)
> > > > > 5.3. Vote
> > > > > Beginning: 16:30 hour, a.d. III Kal. Sextiles (July 30); end: 16:30 hour, Kal. Sextiles (August 1st)
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Art. 6 : The senators are reminded to, and thanked for, observing the SC on the "adoption of internal regulations of the Senate (Senate closed out of sessions, moderation, no discussion when voting)" adopted a.d. III Nonas Dec. 2762 auc (Dec. 3, 2010). Its text may be consulted again at: http://www.novaroma.org/nr/Consular_report_of_December_2762_auc_session .
> > > > >
> > > > > Art. 7 : The relatio ('agenda') of the present session is the following one:
> > > > > Item I – SCU on the appointment of two praetors (discussion + vote)
> > > > > Item II – SCU on electoral tools (discussion + vote)
> > > > > Item III sq. – Possible additional items
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Art. 8 : The items mentioned in the article 6 may be completed in the following days by additional items;
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Art. 9 : The present call of the Senate is worth, towards U.S. state of Maine Law and according its relevant and applicable rules, the convening of Nova Roma inc. Board.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks for your attention, Senators. Have all a good session and valete omnes.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Datum a.d. XI Kal. Sextiles 2763 auc (July 22, 2010 cc).
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > P. Memmius Albucius cos.
> > > > > _________________________________________________________________
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78878 From: Timothy or Stephen Gallagher Date: 2010-07-28
Subject: Proposed dictatorship, No
�Necessity is the plea for every infringement of human freedom. It is the argument of tyrants; it is the creed of slaves.� William Pitt



Salvete Romans,



It has been pointed out by a number of citizens why they oppose the proposed dictatorship. I will now inform you why I oppose it as well.



I voted, for all of five second , for the proposal even though I have always said that I would never support a dictator even if the person named was myself.



I thought in those five seconds that maybe something had to give to get us off of squire one and moving forward. But I realized that moving forward is well within the scope of our exciting institutions and an action like the appointment of a dictator really needs an extraordinary event.



We simply do not have an extraordinary event or a �crisis� that needs a dictatorship.



The first senate agenda listed among a few item voting for IT to the tune of $10,000 and discussion was on going about the rewrite of our corporate bylaws.



A Bylaw rewrite committee under Censor Marinus ,with Senator Cato serving on the committee, had already been worked out. I for one was willing to vote to spend the

$10,000 if that is really what is need to get our IT fixed.



An organization does not need a dictator to write corporate bylaws.



An organization does not need a dictator to spend $10,000 on IT.



The only thing I can think of that would required a dictator is the removal of ones political opponents from the Senate and or Nova Roma. I for one do not think that Censor Marinus would do something like this if made dictator.



So if we do not have a crisis that needs a dictator why appoint one?



The quote above lists �Necessity � as a reason any time someone or some group wants to infringe on the rights of other.



It is necessity that we do this because of X

It is necessity that we do this because of Y

It is necessity that we do this because of Z



Fortunately for Nova Roma there are no concrete �necessaries� that require a dictatorship.



Valete



Ti. Galerius Paulinus

Senator


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78879 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2010-07-28
Subject: Latin class registration--again
A. Tullia Scholastica quiritibus, sociis, peregrinisque bonae voluntatis
S.P.D.

Reminder: we are now accepting registrations for several of our Latin
courses. The traditional-method Grammatica Latina courses have been
available for some time, and now Sermo Latinus II is open. Very shortly
Sermo Latinus I will also be available; site preparation has effectively
been completed in the separate Sermo I and Sermo II classes, and begun in
the combined Sermo I & II class.

Grammatica Latina I and II are taught by traditional methods using the
popular Wheelock text. The first year course covers lessons 1-22, and the
intermediate one deals with the remaining grammar lessons in the text
(23-40), plus readings (GL II), most of which are included in the back of
the text. We do, however, venture beyond those to visit Caesar and other
authors not among those in the text, and teach idioms and scansion, neither
of which have found their way into Wheelock.

Sermo Latinus I, II, and combined I & II are excellent paths to
acquiring fluency in reading, writing, and speaking Latin (yes, speaking;
several of us do in fact speak Latin, and there are a good many
opportunities to do this). The text is Le Latin Sans Peine (bilingual in
French and Latin), which is also available in Italian/Latin. The French
version has been translated onsite into both English and Spanish for the
benefit of the students, so those who can read any one of these four
languages should have no difficulty, though the course itself is taught only
in English and Spanish. We have a new assistant who knows Italian and a
Spanish interpreter; I can more or less manage French.

The Wheelock text (sixth edition, revised by LaFleur) is commonly
available in English-speaking countries, and may be ordered elsewhere via
the Wheelock website <www.wheelockslatin.com> or from a good bookstore; the
Assimil text (Italian only; the French one is out of print) can be ordered
from Assimil (hope I copied this right; it will not select so I can paste
it)

<http://www.assimil.com/descriptionProduitDetail.do?paramIdProduit=1763¶
mIdMethode=1763>

The French version can be downloaded via emule et al. All students
intending to take Sermo Latinus must have the sound files as well; these are
available as cassette tapes or (if one is lucky) in CD form. I believe that
they, too, may be available online.

All students in all courses must have the texts in hand before being
allowed to register. Some have already registered for the Grammatica
classes, and once I can bounce the recalcitrant students from Sermo I on
August 1st, I shall be able to accept registrations from those who have the
text in hand.

Start dates are as follows: Grammatica II, August 30th; Grammatica I,
September 6th (US Labor Day); Sermo I & II combined, September 13th, and the
separate Sermo I and II classes, September 20th. The latter is a slight
change from earlier information as we had to make an adjustment so that the
lesson groups would come out even before the vacation periods.

We have had a good deal of positive feedback from our students, and hope
that we can continue to offer our courses to you. The courses are not a
pushover (for me, either!), but very worthwhile, especially for those in a
Roman-based organization such as NR.

Vale, et valete.


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78880 From: Riku Demyx Date: 2010-07-28
Subject: Re: family-trees of late republican nobility
I would love to see the family tree:) Yahoo blocked it though.
Nero



________________________________
From: C. Curius Saturninus <c.curius@...>
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com; novaromaeurope@yahoogroups.com;
thulenovaroma@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wed, July 28, 2010 12:10:32 PM
Subject: [Nova-Roma] family-trees of late republican nobility


Salvete omnes,

I thought that this might interest some people here. For the past few months I
have been working with family-trees of late republic -era nobility. Here is the
first result of this work. It's a combined chart of family-trees of families who
had three or more consuls between 150 - 50 BCE, plus some other families as
well. I must caution you that this is only a first draft, a work-in-progress,
and not a single detail of it should be trusted blindly. There is still *a lot*
work to be done, in a way this is only a beginning of my research. But because
it gives an unique overall view to the families and their relationships even at
this preliminary stage, I thought to share it here with you.

If the attachment doesn't get past Yahoo barriers, please don't hesitate to
write to me and ask a copy of it. Also, should you notice mistakes or should you
have an additional information, please drop me a mail where you present your
sources and I'll correct the map.

Valete,

C. Curius Saturninus
(Mikko Sillanpää)

Rector Academia Thules ad Studia Romana Antiqua et Nova
Senator - Legatus Pro Praetore Provinciae Thules

e-mail: c.curius@...
www.academiathules.org
thule.novaroma.org

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]







[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78881 From: rory12001 Date: 2010-07-28
Subject: Re: family-trees of late republican nobility
Salve Nero;
Saturninus is a grad student in classics and ran Academia Thules, before the server was struck by lightning; also the podcast, he does a lot and is very imaginative in his projects. I can't wait to see this family tree as well. But you need to write to him.
optime vale
Maior

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Riku Demyx <rikudemyx@...> wrote:
>
> I would love to see the family tree:) Yahoo blocked it though.
> Nero
>
>
>
> ________________________________
> From: C. Curius Saturninus <c.curius@...>
> To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com; novaromaeurope@yahoogroups.com;
> thulenovaroma@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Wed, July 28, 2010 12:10:32 PM
> Subject: [Nova-Roma] family-trees of late republican nobility
>
>
> Salvete omnes,
>
> I thought that this might interest some people here. For the past few months I
> have been working with family-trees of late republic -era nobility. Here is the
> first result of this work. It's a combined chart of family-trees of families who
> had three or more consuls between 150 - 50 BCE, plus some other families as
> well. I must caution you that this is only a first draft, a work-in-progress,
> and not a single detail of it should be trusted blindly. There is still *a lot*
> work to be done, in a way this is only a beginning of my research. But because
> it gives an unique overall view to the families and their relationships even at
> this preliminary stage, I thought to share it here with you.
>
> If the attachment doesn't get past Yahoo barriers, please don't hesitate to
> write to me and ask a copy of it. Also, should you notice mistakes or should you
> have an additional information, please drop me a mail where you present your
> sources and I'll correct the map.
>
> Valete,
>
> C. Curius Saturninus
> (Mikko Sillanpää)
>
> Rector Academia Thules ad Studia Romana Antiqua et Nova
> Senator - Legatus Pro Praetore Provinciae Thules
>
> e-mail: c.curius@...
> www.academiathules.org
> thule.novaroma.org
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78882 From: Gnaea Livia Ocella Date: 2010-07-28
Subject: Re: family-trees of late republican nobility
Salve,

I, too, would love to see the family trees!

Vale,
Livia Ocella

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "C. Curius Saturninus" <c.curius@...> wrote:
>
> Salvete omnes,
>
> I thought that this might interest some people here. For the past few months I have been working with family-trees of late republic -era nobility. Here is the first result of this work. It's a combined chart of family-trees of families who had three or more consuls between 150 - 50 BCE, plus some other families as well. I must caution you that this is only a first draft, a work-in-progress, and not a single detail of it should be trusted blindly. There is still *a lot* work to be done, in a way this is only a beginning of my research. But because it gives an unique overall view to the families and their relationships even at this preliminary stage, I thought to share it here with you.
>
> If the attachment doesn't get past Yahoo barriers, please don't hesitate to write to me and ask a copy of it. Also, should you notice mistakes or should you have an additional information, please drop me a mail where you present your sources and I'll correct the map.
>
> Valete,
>
>
> C. Curius Saturninus
> (Mikko Sillanpää)
>
> Rector Academia Thules ad Studia Romana Antiqua et Nova
> Senator - Legatus Pro Praetore Provinciae Thules
>
> e-mail: c.curius@...
> www.academiathules.org
> thule.novaroma.org
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78883 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2010-07-28
Subject: Re: family-trees of late republican nobility
Yo Maior,

You have been uncommonly quiet these past couple of days.

I have a question for you...or Scholastica or anyone else affiliated with
the Academia Thules.

How long ago was this "lightening strike?" Server's are not that expensive,
how long is it going to take to get the server back up and running again?

Vale,

Sulla

On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 5:37 PM, rory12001 <rory12001@...> wrote:

>
>
> Salve Nero;
> Saturninus is a grad student in classics and ran Academia Thules, before
> the server was struck by lightning; also the podcast, he does a lot and is
> very imaginative in his projects. I can't wait to see this family tree as
> well. But you need to write to him.
> optime vale
> Maior
>
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com <Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com>, Riku Demyx
> <rikudemyx@...> wrote:
> >
> > I would love to see the family tree:) Yahoo blocked it though.
> > Nero
> >
> >
> >
> > ________________________________
> > From: C. Curius Saturninus <c.curius@...>
>
> > To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com <Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com>;
> novaromaeurope@yahoogroups.com <novaromaeurope%40yahoogroups.com>;
> > thulenovaroma@yahoogroups.com <thulenovaroma%40yahoogroups.com>
> > Sent: Wed, July 28, 2010 12:10:32 PM
> > Subject: [Nova-Roma] family-trees of late republican nobility
> >
> >
> > Salvete omnes,
> >
> > I thought that this might interest some people here. For the past few
> months I
> > have been working with family-trees of late republic -era nobility. Here
> is the
> > first result of this work. It's a combined chart of family-trees of
> families who
> > had three or more consuls between 150 - 50 BCE, plus some other families
> as
> > well. I must caution you that this is only a first draft, a
> work-in-progress,
> > and not a single detail of it should be trusted blindly. There is still
> *a lot*
> > work to be done, in a way this is only a beginning of my research. But
> because
> > it gives an unique overall view to the families and their relationships
> even at
> > this preliminary stage, I thought to share it here with you.
> >
> > If the attachment doesn't get past Yahoo barriers, please don't hesitate
> to
> > write to me and ask a copy of it. Also, should you notice mistakes or
> should you
> > have an additional information, please drop me a mail where you present
> your
> > sources and I'll correct the map.
> >
> > Valete,
> >
> > C. Curius Saturninus
> > (Mikko Sillanp����)
>
> >
> > Rector Academia Thules ad Studia Romana Antiqua et Nova
> > Senator - Legatus Pro Praetore Provinciae Thules
> >
> > e-mail: c.curius@...
>
> > www.academiathules.org
> > thule.novaroma.org
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
>
>
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78884 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2010-07-28
Subject: Re: A little refreshing bit of Roman culture: The "De legibus" on Di
>
>
>
> A. Tullia Scholastica C. Petronio Dextro Cn. Cornelio Lentulo quiritibus,
> sociis, peregrinisque bonae voluntatis S.P.D.
>
> C. Dexter Sn. Lentulo suo s.p.d.,
>
>> > "Ast quando duellum gravius discordiaeve civium
> escunt, oenus ne amplius sex menses, si senatus creverit, idem iuris
> quod duo consules teneto, isque ave sinistra dictus populi magister
> esto. Equitatumque qui regat habeto pari iure cum eo quicumque erit
> iuris disceptator." (Cicero, De legibus, III.3.9)
>
>> > I'm waiting for the translation!
>
> In classic Latin:
>
> "At quando bellum gravius discordiaeve civium erunt, unus ne amplius sex
> menses, si senatus creverit, idem iuris quod duo consules teneto, isque avi
> sinistra dictus populi magister esto. Equitatumque qui regat habeto pari iure
> cum eo quicumque erit iuris disceptator".
>
> "Lorsqu'il y aura une guerre trop grave ou des discordes entre citoyens, qu'un
> homme aient le même pouvoir que les deux consuls pas plus de six mois, sur
> décision du sénat, et qu'il soit dit maître du peuple sous de bons augures. Et
> que celui qui commande aux chevaliers ait le même pouvoir que celui qui dira
> le droit."
>
> ATS: It¹s nice to see we have so many people who can read not only
> classical Latin, but also the more archaic version...and do so very quickly,
> dum obsonatum ivi. Now we get to practice our French as well...
>
> Vale.
>
> C. Petronius Dexter
> Arcoiali scribebat
> a.d. VI Kalendas Sextiles P. Memmio K. Fabio II coss.

Valete!
>
>
>




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78885 From: flavius_vedius Date: 2010-07-28
Subject: Re: Against a dictatorship
Salvete Omnes,

As many of you know, I hold the unspeakably deep honor of being the only person to actually have been lawfully appointed to the office of Dictator in the short history of our Res Publica. I also wrote the bulk of our Constitution, wherein the authority for the Senate to appoint such an officer-- to this day referred to as one of the extraordinarii, and for good reason-- derives.

As such, I have an abiding interest in the recent conversations, in which much talk has been made concerning the possibility of appointing a new Dictator.

I will not, at this time, comment on the legality of the vote(s) undertaken by the Senate, nor to the historical precedents that accompany the appointment of Dictators in the history of Roma Antiqua. I speak solely to the sole criterion which is mentioned in our constitution regarding the appointment of a Dictator. And that is, "In times of emergency..."

When I was appointed to the post (which is something that I would not wish upon my worst enemy) there was a consensus among all parties that Nova Roma was indeed in the throws of an emergency. As Decius Iunius said, the very mechanisms of the electoral process were not working. Strictly speaking, no magistrates could be legally elected due to the failure to properly constitute the tribes and centuries. There was literally no legal remedy short of appointing a Dictator (or dissolving Nova Roma entirely and starting anew).

I must confess, I don't see anything in the current situation that remotely approaches anywhere near the level of such an "emergency", as our sole legal precedent establishes. There are disagreements. Vociferous disagreements. And for that reason, we need to appoint a Dictator?

Sweet merciful bloodstained Gods! We have had such disagreements since the very founding of this Res Publica! One of our strengths has been our diversity of opinion, and our robust political life. Where some see failure, I see the give-and-take of hearty debate.

Others, it seems, see dissent that must be crushed.

Unless and until the terms of a true "emergency" are coherently stated, I see no reason that this wild scheme should even be entertained.

Nova Roma certainly has problems (and I have spoken out about them at length, and offered my own solutions which have gone unheeded), but the summary expulsion of people who don't happen to agree with certain individuals is not in any way, shape, matter, or form, the way to address them. And that is precisely what this attempt to establish a new Dictator is.

Valete,

Vedius
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78886 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2010-07-29
Subject: Re: family-trees of late republican nobility
A. Tullia Scholastica L. Cornelio Sullae quiritibus, sociis, peregrinisque
bonae voluntatis S.P.D.

> Yo Maior,
>
> You have been uncommonly quiet these past couple of days.
>
> I have a question for you...or Scholastica or anyone else affiliated with
> the Academia Thules.
>
> How long ago was this "lightening strike?"

I very much doubt that a lightning strike was to blame for the death of
the AT server. It had been ailing for some time before it gave up the
ghost. Moreover, it was shut off every time that T-storms were in the area,
though I thought that surge protectors or whatever could prevent damage in
such cases. There were HD failures, and more likely the switch wore out.

The course server died in early November 2008.

> Server's are not that expensive,
> how long is it going to take to get the server back up and running again?

We were told it would take 10 years to rebuild the course sites due to
the time expenditure required. Kindly note that this failure occurred in
the middle of an academic year, and we did not deem it appropriate to
suspend operations for that length of time. Our students deserved the
opportunity to complete the courses for which they had registered, so we had
to use other means to complete the courses, and to continue their existence.
We are now no longer a part of the Academia Thules, whose demise I consider
unfortunate. The AT was a wonderful idea, and provided a valuable service
to our citizens and others.
>
> Vale,
>
> Sulla

Valete.


>
> On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 5:37 PM, rory12001 <rory12001@...> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> Salve Nero;
>> Saturninus is a grad student in classics and ran Academia Thules, before
>> the server was struck by lightning; also the podcast, he does a lot and is
>> very imaginative in his projects. I can't wait to see this family tree as
>> well. But you need to write to him.
>> optime vale
>> Maior
>>
>>
>> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com <Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com>, Riku Demyx
>> <rikudemyx@...> wrote:
>>>
>>> I would love to see the family tree:) Yahoo blocked it though.
>>> Nero
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ________________________________
>>> From: C. Curius Saturninus <c.curius@...>
>>
>>> To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com <Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com>;
>> novaromaeurope@yahoogroups.com <novaromaeurope%40yahoogroups.com>;
>>> thulenovaroma@yahoogroups.com <thulenovaroma%40yahoogroups.com>
>>> Sent: Wed, July 28, 2010 12:10:32 PM
>>> Subject: [Nova-Roma] family-trees of late republican nobility
>>>
>>>
>>> Salvete omnes,
>>>
>>> I thought that this might interest some people here. For the past few
>> months I
>>> have been working with family-trees of late republic -era nobility. Here
>> is the
>>> first result of this work. It's a combined chart of family-trees of
>> families who
>>> had three or more consuls between 150 - 50 BCE, plus some other families
>> as
>>> well. I must caution you that this is only a first draft, a
>> work-in-progress,
>>> and not a single detail of it should be trusted blindly. There is still
>> *a lot*
>>> work to be done, in a way this is only a beginning of my research. But
>> because
>>> it gives an unique overall view to the families and their relationships
>> even at
>>> this preliminary stage, I thought to share it here with you.
>>>
>>> If the attachment doesn't get past Yahoo barriers, please don't hesitate
>> to
>>> write to me and ask a copy of it. Also, should you notice mistakes or
>> should you
>>> have an additional information, please drop me a mail where you present
>> your
>>> sources and I'll correct the map.
>>>
>>> Valete,
>>>
>>> C. Curius Saturninus
>>> (Mikko Sillanpää)
>>
>>>
>>> Rector Academia Thules ad Studia Romana Antiqua et Nova
>>> Senator - Legatus Pro Praetore Provinciae Thules
>>>
>>> e-mail: c.curius@...
>>
>>> www.academiathules.org
>>> thule.novaroma.org
>>>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78887 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2010-07-29
Subject: Re: family-trees of late republican nobility
Thank you for your response. I did not think Maior's explanation passed the
smell test. I guess if certain individuals were less bent on doing a coup
we could have just spent about a grand to 1500 US on getting a new server.
They are not that expensive anymore. And then the AT could be restarted.

Thank you again,

Sulla



On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 9:25 PM, A. Tullia Scholastica <fororom@...
> wrote:

>
>
> A. Tullia Scholastica L. Cornelio Sullae quiritibus, sociis, peregrinisque
> bonae voluntatis S.P.D.
>
>
> > Yo Maior,
> >
> > You have been uncommonly quiet these past couple of days.
> >
> > I have a question for you...or Scholastica or anyone else affiliated with
> > the Academia Thules.
> >
> > How long ago was this "lightening strike?"
>
> I very much doubt that a lightning strike was to blame for the death of
> the AT server. It had been ailing for some time before it gave up the
> ghost. Moreover, it was shut off every time that T-storms were in the area,
> though I thought that surge protectors or whatever could prevent damage in
> such cases. There were HD failures, and more likely the switch wore out.
>
> The course server died in early November 2008.
>
>
> > Server's are not that expensive,
> > how long is it going to take to get the server back up and running again?
>
> We were told it would take 10 years to rebuild the course sites due to
> the time expenditure required. Kindly note that this failure occurred in
> the middle of an academic year, and we did not deem it appropriate to
> suspend operations for that length of time. Our students deserved the
> opportunity to complete the courses for which they had registered, so we
> had
> to use other means to complete the courses, and to continue their
> existence.
> We are now no longer a part of the Academia Thules, whose demise I consider
> unfortunate. The AT was a wonderful idea, and provided a valuable service
> to our citizens and others.
> >
> > Vale,
> >
> > Sulla
>
> Valete.
>
> >
> > On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 5:37 PM, rory12001 <rory12001@...<rory12001%40yahoo.com>>
> wrote:
> >
> >>
> >>
> >> Salve Nero;
> >> Saturninus is a grad student in classics and ran Academia Thules, before
> >> the server was struck by lightning; also the podcast, he does a lot and
> is
> >> very imaginative in his projects. I can't wait to see this family tree
> as
> >> well. But you need to write to him.
> >> optime vale
> >> Maior
> >>
> >>
> >> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com <Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com><Nova-Roma%
> 40yahoogroups.com>, Riku Demyx
>
> >> <rikudemyx@...> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> I would love to see the family tree:) Yahoo blocked it though.
> >>> Nero
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> ________________________________
> >>> From: C. Curius Saturninus <c.curius@...>
> >>
> >>> To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com <Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com><Nova-Roma%
> 40yahoogroups.com>;
> >> novaromaeurope@yahoogroups.com <novaromaeurope%40yahoogroups.com><novaromaeurope%
> 40yahoogroups.com>;
> >>> thulenovaroma@yahoogroups.com <thulenovaroma%40yahoogroups.com><thulenovaroma%
> 40yahoogroups.com>
>
> >>> Sent: Wed, July 28, 2010 12:10:32 PM
> >>> Subject: [Nova-Roma] family-trees of late republican nobility
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Salvete omnes,
> >>>
> >>> I thought that this might interest some people here. For the past few
> >> months I
> >>> have been working with family-trees of late republic -era nobility.
> Here
> >> is the
> >>> first result of this work. It's a combined chart of family-trees of
> >> families who
> >>> had three or more consuls between 150 - 50 BCE, plus some other
> families
> >> as
> >>> well. I must caution you that this is only a first draft, a
> >> work-in-progress,
> >>> and not a single detail of it should be trusted blindly. There is still
> >> *a lot*
> >>> work to be done, in a way this is only a beginning of my research. But
> >> because
> >>> it gives an unique overall view to the families and their relationships
> >> even at
> >>> this preliminary stage, I thought to share it here with you.
> >>>
> >>> If the attachment doesn't get past Yahoo barriers, please don't
> hesitate
> >> to
> >>> write to me and ask a copy of it. Also, should you notice mistakes or
> >> should you
> >>> have an additional information, please drop me a mail where you present
> >> your
> >>> sources and I'll correct the map.
> >>>
> >>> Valete,
> >>>
> >>> C. Curius Saturninus
> >>> (Mikko Sillanp��)
>
> >>
> >>>
> >>> Rector Academia Thules ad Studia Romana Antiqua et Nova
> >>> Senator - Legatus Pro Praetore Provinciae Thules
> >>>
> >>> e-mail: c.curius@...
> >>
> >>> www.academiathules.org
> >>> thule.novaroma.org
> >>>
>
>
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78888 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2010-07-29
Subject: Re: family-trees of late republican nobility
>
>
> A. Tullia Scholastica Cn. Liviae Ocellae quiritibus, sociis, peregrinisque
> bonae voluntatis S.P.D.
>
>
>
>
> Salve,
>
> I, too, would love to see the family trees!
>
> ATS: So would I, but I no longer communicate with Saturninus.
> Incidentally, it is not strictly Yahoo which removed this, but the settings
> for the ML; we do not allow attachments any more. We did that for a year or
> so, but so far as I know, the ML has not allowed attachments for most of its
> existence.
>
> Vale,
> Livia Ocella
>
> Vale, et valete.
>
>
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com <mailto:Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com> , "C.
> Curius Saturninus" <c.curius@...> wrote:
>> >
>> > Salvete omnes,
>> >
>> > I thought that this might interest some people here. For the past few
>> months I have been working with family-trees of late republic -era nobility.
>> Here is the first result of this work. It's a combined chart of family-trees
>> of families who had three or more consuls between 150 - 50 BCE, plus some
>> other families as well. I must caution you that this is only a first draft, a
>> work-in-progress, and not a single detail of it should be trusted blindly.
>> There is still *a lot* work to be done, in a way this is only a beginning of
>> my research. But because it gives an unique overall view to the families and
>> their relationships even at this preliminary stage, I thought to share it
>> here with you.
>> >
>> > If the attachment doesn't get past Yahoo barriers, please don't hesitate to
>> write to me and ask a copy of it. Also, should you notice mistakes or should
>> you have an additional information, please drop me a mail where you present
>> your sources and I'll correct the map.
>> >
>> > Valete,
>> >
>> >
>> > C. Curius Saturninus
>> > (Mikko Sillanpää)
>> >
>> > Rector Academia Thules ad Studia Romana Antiqua et Nova
>> > Senator - Legatus Pro Praetore Provinciae Thules
>> >
>> > e-mail: c.curius@...
>> > www.academiathules.org
>> > thule.novaroma.org
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>> >
>
>
>




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78889 From: rory12001 Date: 2010-07-29
Subject: Re: family-trees of late republican nobility
Salvete;
he just sent it to me and it is amazing, uber complex and if you'll need your glasses!
vale

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "A. Tullia Scholastica" <fororom@...> wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > A. Tullia Scholastica Cn. Liviae Ocellae quiritibus, sociis, peregrinisque
> > bonae voluntatis S.P.D.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Salve,
> >
> > I, too, would love to see the family trees!
> >
> > ATS: So would I, but I no longer communicate with Saturninus.
> > Incidentally, it is not strictly Yahoo which removed this, but the settings
> > for the ML; we do not allow attachments any more. We did that for a year or
> > so, but so far as I know, the ML has not allowed attachments for most of its
> > existence.
> >
> > Vale,
> > Livia Ocella
> >
> > Vale, et valete.
> >
> >
> >
> > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com <mailto:Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com> , "C.
> > Curius Saturninus" <c.curius@> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > Salvete omnes,
> >> >
> >> > I thought that this might interest some people here. For the past few
> >> months I have been working with family-trees of late republic -era nobility.
> >> Here is the first result of this work. It's a combined chart of family-trees
> >> of families who had three or more consuls between 150 - 50 BCE, plus some
> >> other families as well. I must caution you that this is only a first draft, a
> >> work-in-progress, and not a single detail of it should be trusted blindly.
> >> There is still *a lot* work to be done, in a way this is only a beginning of
> >> my research. But because it gives an unique overall view to the families and
> >> their relationships even at this preliminary stage, I thought to share it
> >> here with you.
> >> >
> >> > If the attachment doesn't get past Yahoo barriers, please don't hesitate to
> >> write to me and ask a copy of it. Also, should you notice mistakes or should
> >> you have an additional information, please drop me a mail where you present
> >> your sources and I'll correct the map.
> >> >
> >> > Valete,
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > C. Curius Saturninus
> >> > (Mikko Sillanpää)
> >> >
> >> > Rector Academia Thules ad Studia Romana Antiqua et Nova
> >> > Senator - Legatus Pro Praetore Provinciae Thules
> >> >
> >> > e-mail: c.curius@
> >> > www.academiathules.org
> >> > thule.novaroma.org
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78890 From: Gaius Tullius Valerianus Date: 2010-07-29
Subject: Re: family-trees of late republican nobility
Well, I'm guessing that even if they *had *a server, the complaint was that
it would take a decade to get the software and especially the content back
up. Now, I don't know just how much content was there, but I can't imagine
it requiring an entire decade to rebuild a website . . . depends what was on
it, I guess . . .

~ Valerianus

On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 12:29 AM, Robert Woolwine <robert.woolwine@...
> wrote:

> Thank you for your response. I did not think Maior's explanation passed the
> smell test. I guess if certain individuals were less bent on doing a coup
> we could have just spent about a grand to 1500 US on getting a new server.
> They are not that expensive anymore. And then the AT could be restarted.
>
> Thank you again,
>
> Sulla
>
>
>
> On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 9:25 PM, A. Tullia Scholastica <
> fororom@...
> > wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > A. Tullia Scholastica L. Cornelio Sullae quiritibus, sociis,
> peregrinisque
> > bonae voluntatis S.P.D.
> >
> >
> > > Yo Maior,
> > >
> > > You have been uncommonly quiet these past couple of days.
> > >
> > > I have a question for you...or Scholastica or anyone else affiliated
> with
> > > the Academia Thules.
> > >
> > > How long ago was this "lightening strike?"
> >
> > I very much doubt that a lightning strike was to blame for the death of
> > the AT server. It had been ailing for some time before it gave up the
> > ghost. Moreover, it was shut off every time that T-storms were in the
> area,
> > though I thought that surge protectors or whatever could prevent damage
> in
> > such cases. There were HD failures, and more likely the switch wore out.
> >
> > The course server died in early November 2008.
> >
> >
> > > Server's are not that expensive,
> > > how long is it going to take to get the server back up and running
> again?
> >
> > We were told it would take 10 years to rebuild the course sites due to
> > the time expenditure required. Kindly note that this failure occurred in
> > the middle of an academic year, and we did not deem it appropriate to
> > suspend operations for that length of time. Our students deserved the
> > opportunity to complete the courses for which they had registered, so we
> > had
> > to use other means to complete the courses, and to continue their
> > existence.
> > We are now no longer a part of the Academia Thules, whose demise I
> consider
> > unfortunate. The AT was a wonderful idea, and provided a valuable service
> > to our citizens and others.
> > >
> > > Vale,
> > >
> > > Sulla
> >
> > Valete.
> >
> > >
> > > On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 5:37 PM, rory12001 <rory12001@...
> <rory12001%40yahoo.com>>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> Salve Nero;
> > >> Saturninus is a grad student in classics and ran Academia Thules,
> before
> > >> the server was struck by lightning; also the podcast, he does a lot
> and
> > is
> > >> very imaginative in his projects. I can't wait to see this family tree
> > as
> > >> well. But you need to write to him.
> > >> optime vale
> > >> Maior
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com <Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com
> ><Nova-Roma%
> > 40yahoogroups.com>, Riku Demyx
> >
> > >> <rikudemyx@...> wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>> I would love to see the family tree:) Yahoo blocked it though.
> > >>> Nero
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> ________________________________
> > >>> From: C. Curius Saturninus <c.curius@...>
> > >>
> > >>> To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com <Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com
> ><Nova-Roma%
> > 40yahoogroups.com>;
> > >> novaromaeurope@yahoogroups.com <novaromaeurope%40yahoogroups.com
> ><novaromaeurope%
> > 40yahoogroups.com>;
> > >>> thulenovaroma@yahoogroups.com <thulenovaroma%40yahoogroups.com
> ><thulenovaroma%
> > 40yahoogroups.com>
> >
> > >>> Sent: Wed, July 28, 2010 12:10:32 PM
> > >>> Subject: [Nova-Roma] family-trees of late republican nobility
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> Salvete omnes,
> > >>>
> > >>> I thought that this might interest some people here. For the past few
> > >> months I
> > >>> have been working with family-trees of late republic -era nobility.
> > Here
> > >> is the
> > >>> first result of this work. It's a combined chart of family-trees of
> > >> families who
> > >>> had three or more consuls between 150 - 50 BCE, plus some other
> > families
> > >> as
> > >>> well. I must caution you that this is only a first draft, a
> > >> work-in-progress,
> > >>> and not a single detail of it should be trusted blindly. There is
> still
> > >> *a lot*
> > >>> work to be done, in a way this is only a beginning of my research.
> But
> > >> because
> > >>> it gives an unique overall view to the families and their
> relationships
> > >> even at
> > >>> this preliminary stage, I thought to share it here with you.
> > >>>
> > >>> If the attachment doesn't get past Yahoo barriers, please don't
> > hesitate
> > >> to
> > >>> write to me and ask a copy of it. Also, should you notice mistakes or
> > >> should you
> > >>> have an additional information, please drop me a mail where you
> present
> > >> your
> > >>> sources and I'll correct the map.
> > >>>
> > >>> Valete,
> > >>>
> > >>> C. Curius Saturninus
> > >>> (Mikko Sillanpää)
> >
> > >>
> > >>>
> > >>> Rector Academia Thules ad Studia Romana Antiqua et Nova
> > >>> Senator - Legatus Pro Praetore Provinciae Thules
> > >>>
> > >>> e-mail: c.curius@...
> > >>
> > >>> www.academiathules.org
> > >>> thule.novaroma.org
> > >>>
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78891 From: Belle Morte Date: 2010-07-29
Subject: Re: family-trees of late republican nobility
Salve,


Would definitely love to see this, expect an e-mail in the morning.


Vale,
Aeternia

On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 11:10 AM, C. Curius Saturninus <
c.curius@...> wrote:

>
>
> Salvete omnes,
>
> I thought that this might interest some people here. For the past few
> months I have been working with family-trees of late republic -era nobility.
> Here is the first result of this work. It's a combined chart of family-trees
> of families who had three or more consuls between 150 - 50 BCE, plus some
> other families as well. I must caution you that this is only a first draft,
> a work-in-progress, and not a single detail of it should be trusted blindly.
> There is still *a lot* work to be done, in a way this is only a beginning of
> my research. But because it gives an unique overall view to the families and
> their relationships even at this preliminary stage, I thought to share it
> here with you.
>
> If the attachment doesn't get past Yahoo barriers, please don't hesitate to
> write to me and ask a copy of it. Also, should you notice mistakes or should
> you have an additional information, please drop me a mail where you present
> your sources and I'll correct the map.
>
> Valete,
>
> C. Curius Saturninus
> (Mikko Sillanp��)
>
> Rector Academia Thules ad Studia Romana Antiqua et Nova
> Senator - Legatus Pro Praetore Provinciae Thules
>
> e-mail: c.curius@... <c.curius%40academiathules.org>
> www.academiathules.org
> thule.novaroma.org
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78892 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2010-07-29
Subject: Re: family-trees of late republican nobility
>
>
> A. Tullia Scholastica collegae C. Tullio Valeriano quiritibus, sociis,
> peregrinisque bonae voluntatis S.P.D.
>
>
> Well, I'm guessing that even if they *had *a server, the complaint was that
> it would take a decade to get the software and especially the content back
> up. Now, I don't know just how much content was there, but I can't imagine
> it requiring an entire decade to rebuild a website . . . depends what was on
> it, I guess . . .
>
> ATS: There were some fifty courses, if I remember correctly, 8 from us
> Latinists alone. All had lessons onsite, and many had sound files and other
> resources onsite, not to mention student lists assigned to the various
> courses. There was a lot to rebuild, but Saturninus is / was heavily
> committed, and could not spare the time. Last I heard (Feb. 2009), the
> machine was to be shipped to him from Sweden, but for all I know that never
> happened.
>
> It would indeed be good if the AT could be restarted; it provided an
> opportunity for many of our citizens and others to learn things not available
> in their schools or universities, and that, too, for free. However, Avitus
> and I are happy where we are, and presumably will remain there, whatever
> happens with the AT.
>
> ~ Valerianus
>
> Vale, et valete.
>
>
>
> On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 12:29 AM, Robert Woolwine <robert.woolwine@...
> <mailto:robert.woolwine%40gmail.com>
>> > wrote:
>
>> > Thank you for your response. I did not think Maior's explanation passed the
>> > smell test. I guess if certain individuals were less bent on doing a coup
>> > we could have just spent about a grand to 1500 US on getting a new server.
>> > They are not that expensive anymore. And then the AT could be restarted.
>> >
>> > Thank you again,
>> >
>> > Sulla
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 9:25 PM, A. Tullia Scholastica <
>> > fororom@... <mailto:fororom%40localnet.com>
>>> > > wrote:
>> >
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > > A. Tullia Scholastica L. Cornelio Sullae quiritibus, sociis,
>> > peregrinisque
>>> > > bonae voluntatis S.P.D.
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>>> > > > Yo Maior,
>>>> > > >
>>>> > > > You have been uncommonly quiet these past couple of days.
>>>> > > >
>>>> > > > I have a question for you...or Scholastica or anyone else affiliated
>> > with
>>>> > > > the Academia Thules.
>>>> > > >
>>>> > > > How long ago was this "lightening strike?"
>>> > >
>>> > > I very much doubt that a lightning strike was to blame for the death of
>>> > > the AT server. It had been ailing for some time before it gave up the
>>> > > ghost. Moreover, it was shut off every time that T-storms were in the
>> > area,
>>> > > though I thought that surge protectors or whatever could prevent damage
>> > in
>>> > > such cases. There were HD failures, and more likely the switch wore out.
>>> > >
>>> > > The course server died in early November 2008.
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>>> > > > Server's are not that expensive,
>>>> > > > how long is it going to take to get the server back up and running
>> > again?
>>> > >
>>> > > We were told it would take 10 years to rebuild the course sites due to
>>> > > the time expenditure required. Kindly note that this failure occurred in
>>> > > the middle of an academic year, and we did not deem it appropriate to
>>> > > suspend operations for that length of time. Our students deserved the
>>> > > opportunity to complete the courses for which they had registered, so we
>>> > > had
>>> > > to use other means to complete the courses, and to continue their
>>> > > existence.
>>> > > We are now no longer a part of the Academia Thules, whose demise I
>> > consider
>>> > > unfortunate. The AT was a wonderful idea, and provided a valuable
>>> service
>>> > > to our citizens and others.
>>>> > > >
>>>> > > > Vale,
>>>> > > >
>>>> > > > Sulla
>>> > >
>>> > > Valete.
>>> > >
>>>> > > >
>>>> > > > On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 5:37 PM, rory12001 <rory12001@...
>>>> <mailto:rory12001%40yahoo.com>
>> > <rory12001%40yahoo.com>>
>>> > > wrote:
>>>> > > >
>>>>> > > >>
>>>>> > > >>
>>>>> > > >> Salve Nero;
>>>>> > > >> Saturninus is a grad student in classics and ran Academia Thules,
>> > before
>>>>> > > >> the server was struck by lightning; also the podcast, he does a lot
>> > and
>>> > > is
>>>>> > > >> very imaginative in his projects. I can't wait to see this family
tree
>>> > > as
>>>>> > > >> well. But you need to write to him.
>>>>> > > >> optime vale
>>>>> > > >> Maior
>>>>> > > >>
>>>>> > > >>
>>>>> > > >> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
>>>>> <mailto:Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com> <Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com
>>> > ><Nova-Roma%
>>> > > 40yahoogroups.com>, Riku Demyx
>>> > >
>>>>> > > >> <rikudemyx@...> wrote:
>>>>>> > > >>>
>>>>>> > > >>> I would love to see the family tree:) Yahoo blocked it though.
>>>>>> > > >>> Nero
>>>>>> > > >>>
>>>>>> > > >>>
>>>>>> > > >>>
>>>>>> > > >>> ________________________________
>>>>>> > > >>> From: C. Curius Saturninus <c.curius@...>
>>>>> > > >>
>>>>>> > > >>> To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
>>>>>> <mailto:Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com> <Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com
>>> > ><Nova-Roma%
>>> > > 40yahoogroups.com>;
>>>>> > > >> novaromaeurope@yahoogroups.com
>>>>> <mailto:novaromaeurope%40yahoogroups.com>
>>>>> <novaromaeurope%40yahoogroups.com
>>> > ><novaromaeurope%
>>> > > 40yahoogroups.com>;
>>>>>> > > >>> thulenovaroma@yahoogroups.com
>>>>>> <mailto:thulenovaroma%40yahoogroups.com>
>>>>>> <thulenovaroma%40yahoogroups.com
>>> > ><thulenovaroma%
>>> > > 40yahoogroups.com>
>>> > >
>>>>>> > > >>> Sent: Wed, July 28, 2010 12:10:32 PM
>>>>>> > > >>> Subject: [Nova-Roma] family-trees of late republican nobility
>>>>>> > > >>>
>>>>>> > > >>>
>>>>>> > > >>> Salvete omnes,
>>>>>> > > >>>
>>>>>> > > >>> I thought that this might interest some people here. For the past
few
>>>>> > > >> months I
>>>>>> > > >>> have been working with family-trees of late republic -era >>>>>>
nobility.
>>> > > Here
>>>>> > > >> is the
>>>>>> > > >>> first result of this work. It's a combined chart of family-trees
of
>>>>> > > >> families who
>>>>>> > > >>> had three or more consuls between 150 - 50 BCE, plus some other
>>> > > families
>>>>> > > >> as
>>>>>> > > >>> well. I must caution you that this is only a first draft, a
>>>>> > > >> work-in-progress,
>>>>>> > > >>> and not a single detail of it should be trusted blindly. There is
>> > still
>>>>> > > >> *a lot*
>>>>>> > > >>> work to be done, in a way this is only a beginning of my >>>>>>
research.
>> > But
>>>>> > > >> because
>>>>>> > > >>> it gives an unique overall view to the families and their
>> > relationships
>>>>> > > >> even at
>>>>>> > > >>> this preliminary stage, I thought to share it here with you.
>>>>>> > > >>>
>>>>>> > > >>> If the attachment doesn't get past Yahoo barriers, please don't
>>> > > hesitate
>>>>> > > >> to
>>>>>> > > >>> write to me and ask a copy of it. Also, should you notice
>>>>>> mistakes or
>>>>> > > >> should you
>>>>>> > > >>> have an additional information, please drop me a mail where you
>> > present
>>>>> > > >> your
>>>>>> > > >>> sources and I'll correct the map.
>>>>>> > > >>>
>>>>>> > > >>> Valete,
>>>>>> > > >>>
>>>>>> > > >>> C. Curius Saturninus
>>>>>> > > >>> (Mikko Sillanpää)
>>> > >
>>>>> > > >>
>>>>>> > > >>>
>>>>>> > > >>> Rector Academia Thules ad Studia Romana Antiqua et Nova
>>>>>> > > >>> Senator - Legatus Pro Praetore Provinciae Thules
>>>>>> > > >>>
>>>>>> > > >>> e-mail: c.curius@...
>>>>> > > >>
>>>>>> > > >>> www.academiathules.org
>>>>>> > > >>> thule.novaroma.org
>>>>>> > > >>>




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78893 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2010-07-29
Subject: Re: family-trees of late republican nobility
A. Tullia Scholastica iterum L. Cornelio Sullae quiritibus, sociis,
peregrinisque bonae voluntatis S.P.D.

> Thank you for your response.

You're quite welcome.


> I did not think Maior's explanation passed the
> smell test.

Well, from what I understand, there are indeed a lot of electrical
storms there at certain times of year, but this was not an instantaneous
failure.


> I guess if certain individuals were less bent on doing a coup
> we could have just spent about a grand to 1500 US on getting a new server.

This, however, preceded any such political activities. I would hesitate
to combine these two apparently unrelated events. Perhaps, too, the things
cost much more in the north country.


> They are not that expensive anymore. And then the AT could be restarted.

It would be highly beneficial if the AT could be restarted. They lost
their Latin department, however, after Avitus invested months, even years,
of work into administrative and other matters.
>
> Thank you again,

Again you are welcome.
>
> Sulla
>
Vale, et valete.


>
> On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 9:25 PM, A. Tullia Scholastica <fororom@...
>> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> A. Tullia Scholastica L. Cornelio Sullae quiritibus, sociis, peregrinisque
>> bonae voluntatis S.P.D.
>>
>>
>>> Yo Maior,
>>>
>>> You have been uncommonly quiet these past couple of days.
>>>
>>> I have a question for you...or Scholastica or anyone else affiliated with
>>> the Academia Thules.
>>>
>>> How long ago was this "lightening strike?"
>>
>> I very much doubt that a lightning strike was to blame for the death of
>> the AT server. It had been ailing for some time before it gave up the
>> ghost. Moreover, it was shut off every time that T-storms were in the area,
>> though I thought that surge protectors or whatever could prevent damage in
>> such cases. There were HD failures, and more likely the switch wore out.
>>
>> The course server died in early November 2008.
>>
>>
>>> Server's are not that expensive,
>>> how long is it going to take to get the server back up and running again?
>>
>> We were told it would take 10 years to rebuild the course sites due to
>> the time expenditure required. Kindly note that this failure occurred in
>> the middle of an academic year, and we did not deem it appropriate to
>> suspend operations for that length of time. Our students deserved the
>> opportunity to complete the courses for which they had registered, so we
>> had
>> to use other means to complete the courses, and to continue their
>> existence.
>> We are now no longer a part of the Academia Thules, whose demise I consider
>> unfortunate. The AT was a wonderful idea, and provided a valuable service
>> to our citizens and others.
>>>
>>> Vale,
>>>
>>> Sulla
>>
>> Valete.
>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 5:37 PM, rory12001
>>> <rory12001@...<rory12001%40yahoo.com>>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Salve Nero;
>>>> Saturninus is a grad student in classics and ran Academia Thules, before
>>>> the server was struck by lightning; also the podcast, he does a lot and
>> is
>>>> very imaginative in his projects. I can't wait to see this family tree
>> as
>>>> well. But you need to write to him.
>>>> optime vale
>>>> Maior
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com <Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com><Nova-Roma%
>> 40yahoogroups.com>, Riku Demyx
>>
>>>> <rikudemyx@...> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> I would love to see the family tree:) Yahoo blocked it though.
>>>>> Nero
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ________________________________
>>>>> From: C. Curius Saturninus <c.curius@...>
>>>>
>>>>> To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com <Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com><Nova-Roma%
>> 40yahoogroups.com>;
>>>> novaromaeurope@yahoogroups.com
>>>> <novaromaeurope%40yahoogroups.com><novaromaeurope%
>> 40yahoogroups.com>;
>>>>> thulenovaroma@yahoogroups.com
>>>>> <thulenovaroma%40yahoogroups.com><thulenovaroma%
>> 40yahoogroups.com>
>>
>>>>> Sent: Wed, July 28, 2010 12:10:32 PM
>>>>> Subject: [Nova-Roma] family-trees of late republican nobility
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Salvete omnes,
>>>>>
>>>>> I thought that this might interest some people here. For the past few
>>>> months I
>>>>> have been working with family-trees of late republic -era nobility.
>> Here
>>>> is the
>>>>> first result of this work. It's a combined chart of family-trees of
>>>> families who
>>>>> had three or more consuls between 150 - 50 BCE, plus some other
>> families
>>>> as
>>>>> well. I must caution you that this is only a first draft, a
>>>> work-in-progress,
>>>>> and not a single detail of it should be trusted blindly. There is still
>>>> *a lot*
>>>>> work to be done, in a way this is only a beginning of my research. But
>>>> because
>>>>> it gives an unique overall view to the families and their relationships
>>>> even at
>>>>> this preliminary stage, I thought to share it here with you.
>>>>>
>>>>> If the attachment doesn't get past Yahoo barriers, please don't
>> hesitate
>>>> to
>>>>> write to me and ask a copy of it. Also, should you notice mistakes or
>>>> should you
>>>>> have an additional information, please drop me a mail where you present
>>>> your
>>>>> sources and I'll correct the map.
>>>>>
>>>>> Valete,
>>>>>
>>>>> C. Curius Saturninus
>>>>> (Mikko Sillanp��)
>>
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Rector Academia Thules ad Studia Romana Antiqua et Nova
>>>>> Senator - Legatus Pro Praetore Provinciae Thules
>>>>>
>>>>> e-mail: c.curius@...
>>>>
>>>>> www.academiathules.org
>>>>> thule.novaroma.org
>>>>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78894 From: marcushoratius Date: 2010-07-29
Subject: a. d. IV Kalendas Sextilias: The Last Days of Carthage
M. Moravius Piscinus Pontifex Maximus Quiritibus, cultoribus Deorum et omnibus salutem plurimam dicit: Diis bene iuvantibus simus.

Hodie est ante diem IIII Kalendas Sextilias; haec dies comitialis est: Leonis in pectore clara stella exoritur; interdum tempestatem significat.

AUC 607 / 146 BCE: The Last Days of Carthage

"Carthage which had a circumference of 34 kilometers, was besieged with much labor, and captured part by part; first by deputy Mancinus, then by consul Scipio [Aemilianus], to whom the African command had been assigned without casting lots. Because the old harbor had been blocked by Scipio, the Carthaginians dug a new one, and quickly and secretly built a large fleet, with which they fought an unsuccessful naval battle. The castle of Hasdrubal, their leader, on difficult terrain near the town of Nepheris was also destroyed by Scipio, who finally captured the city in the seven-hundredth year since it was founded." ~ Livy, Perioche 51.1-3

The Perioche is only a index of the Histories by Titus Livius. Unfortunately little of his work remains today, and none of his books on the Third Punic War. The Histories by Livius was the main source for the first part of the Epitome by Florus on early Roman history. It covers the Third Punic War in a single paragraph. We have to turn to a still later author for some details, which were based on tertiary histories like that of Livius.

"While Scipio was proceeding to Africa, Mancinus in sailing past Carthage noticed a place called Megalia which was inside the city wall on an abrupt cliff and extended down to the sea; the place was a long distance away from the rest of the town and had but few guards because of the natural strength of its position. So Mancinus suddenly applied ladders to it from the ships and ascended. When he had already got up there, some of the Carthaginians hastily gathered, but they were unable to repulse him. He then sent to Piso an account of his exploit and a request for assistance. Piso, however, being far in the interior, was of no aid to Mancinus; but Scipio chanced to come along at night just after the receipt of the news and rendered prompt aid. For the Carthaginians would have either captured or destroyed Mancinus, if they had not seen Scipio's vessels sailing past; then they grew discouraged, but would not fall back. So Scipio sent them some captives to tell them that he was at hand; and upon learning this they no longer stood their ground, but retired and fortified with trenches and palisades the cross-wall in front of the houses, meanwhile sending for Hasdrubal. Scipio now left Mancinus to guard Megalia and set out himself to join Piso and the troops, so as to have their support in his operations. He quickly returned with the lightest-armed troops and found that Hasdrubal had entered Carthage and was attacking Mancinus fiercely. The arrival of Scipio put an end to the attack. When Piso too had now arrived, Scipio commanded him to encamp outside the wall opposite certain gates, and he sent other soldiers round to a little gate a long distance away from the main force, with orders as to what they must do. Then he himself about midnight took the strongest part of the army, got inside the wall, under the guidance of deserters, and hurrying round to a point inside the little gate, he hacked the bar in two, let in the men who were on the watch outside, and destroyed the guards. He then hastened to the gate opposite which Piso had his station, routing the intervening guards, who were only a few in each place, so that Hasdrubal by the time he found out what had happened saw that nearly the whole force of the Romans was inside. For a time, indeed, the Carthaginians withstood them; then they abandoned the remainder of the city and fled for refuge to Cotho and the Byrsa. Next Hasdrubal killed all the Roman captives, in order that the Carthaginians, in despair of pardon, might resist with greater zeal. He also made way with many of the natives on the charge that they were betraying their own cause. Scipio surrounded them with a palisade and walled them in, yet it was some time before he captured them, for their walls were strong, and the men inside, being many in number and confined in a small space, made a vigorous resistance. They were well off for food, too; for Bithias, taking advantage of wind and tide, whenever a heavy gale blew, would send merchantmen into the harbour to them from the mainland opposite the city. To overcome this opposition Scipio conceived and executed a remarkable undertaking, namely, the filling up of the narrow entrance to the harbour. The work was difficult and toilsome, but was nevertheless brought to completion, thanks to the great number of men employed. The Carthaginians, to be sure, undertook to check them, and many battles took place during the course of the work, but they were unable to prevent the filling of the channel.

"So, when the mouth of the harbour had been filled, the Carthaginians were terribly oppressed by the scarcity of food; and some of them deserted, while others held out and died, and still others ate the dead bodies. Hence Hasdrubal, in discouragement, sent envoys to Scipio with regard to a truce, and would have obtained immunity, had he not desired to secure both safety and freedom for all the rest as well. After he had failed for this reason to accomplish his purpose, he confined his wife in the citadel because she had made overtures to Scipio looking to the safety of herself and her children; and in other respects he grew bolder in his conduct of affairs as a result of despair. He, therefore, and some others, mastered by frenzy, fought both night and day, sometimes losing and sometimes winning; and they devised engines to oppose the Roman engines. Moreover, Bithias, who held a strong fortress and scoured wide stretches of the mainland, was helping the Carthaginians and injuring the Romans. Hence Scipio also divided his army, assigning one half of it to invest Carthage, while he sent the other half against Bithias, placing at the head of it his lieutenant, Gaius Laelius. He himself went back and forth from one division to the other on visits of inspection. Finally the fortress was taken, and the siege of Carthage was once more conducted by the whole army.

"The Carthaginians, despairing, consequently, of being any longer able to save both walls, betook themselves to the enclosure of the Byrsa, since it was better fortified, at the same time transferring thither all the objects that they could. Then at night they burned the dockyard and most of the other structures, in order to deprive the enemy of any benefit from them. When the Romans became aware of their action, they occupied the harbour and hastened against the Byrsa. After occupying the houses on each side of it, some of the besiegers walked along on top of the roofs by successively stepping to those adjacent, and others by digging through the walls pushed onward below until they reached the very citadel. When they had got thus far, the Carthaginians offered no further opposition, but sued for peace — all except Hasdrubal. He, together with the deserters, to whom Scipio would grant no truce, crowded into the temple of Aesculapius along with his wife and children; and there he defended himself against the assailants until the deserters set fire to the temple and climbed to the roof to await the last extremity of the flames. Then, vanquished, he came to Scipio holding the suppliant branch. His wife witnessed his entreaties, and after calling him by name and reproaching him for securing safety for himself, when he had not allowed her to obtain terms, threw her children into the fire and then cast herself in.

"Thus Scipio took Carthage; and he sent to the senate the following message: "Carthage is taken. What are our orders now?" When these words had been read, they took counsel as to what should be done. Cato expressed the opinion that they ought to raze the city and blot out the Carthaginians, whereas Scipio Nasica still advised sparing the Carthaginians. And thereupon the senate became involved in a great dispute and contention, until some one declared that for the Romans' own sake, if for no other reason, it must be considered necessary to spare them. With this nation for antagonists they would be sure to practise valour instead of turning aside to pleasures and luxury; whereas, if those who were able to compel them to practise warlike pursuits should be removed from the scene, they might deteriorate from want of practice, through a lack of worthy competitors. As a result of the discussion all became unanimous in favour of destroying Carthage, since they felt sure that its inhabitants would never remain entirely at peace. The whole city was therefore utterly blotted out of existence, and it was decreed that for any person to settle upon its site should be an accursed act. The majority of the men captured were thrown into prison and there perished, and some few were sold. But the very foremost men together with the hostages and Hasdrubal and Bithias spent their lives in different parts of Italy in honourable confinement. Scipio secured both glory and honour and was called Africanus, not after his grandfather, but because of his own achievements." ~ Cassius Dio, Roman History (Zonaras) 21.29-30


Our thought for today is from Stobaeus 46:

Those that do not punish bad men, wish that good men may be injured.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78895 From: marcushoratius Date: 2010-07-29
Subject: ANNOUNCEMENT: Confarreationes in August
M. Moravius Piscinus Pontifex Maximus Quiritibus, cultoribus et omnibus s. p. d.

I am very delighted to announce the following confarreationes:

Titus Iunius Brutus and Gaia Lucilia Severa

Appius Furius Lupus and Lucia Cassia Dives

Marcus Octavius Corvus and Appia Flavia Gemella


On 4 August AUC 2763 at Oppidium Poltava in Provincia Sarmatia

The confarreationes shall be performed by Pontifex Cn. Cornelius Lentulus on my behalf, with Augur M. Lucretius Agricola attending at the Sarmatia Days Festival (2-10 August).


Additional ceremonies to be performed by Pontifex Cn. Cornelius Lentulus will include the consecration of the Temple of Iuppiter Perunus of Nova Roma. The Pontifex shall also consecrate M. Lucretius Agricola as Augur Publicus of Nova Roma and inaugurate M. Octavius Corvus as an Augur of Provincia Sarmatia.


The news of these confarreationes has been doubly pleasing for me. It is very heartening to see the religio Romana progressing in living communities as these ceremonies demonstrate. By co-incidence the date chosen for these weddings is also the day I shall be celebrating my own thirty-seventh wedding anniversary. So it comes on a most propitious day for me. I wish Titus and Gaia, Appius and Lucia, Marcus and Appia as much happiness as I have shared over the many years with my wife. And I ask all cultores Deorum to join me in sending these Romani your best wishes.


Di Deaeque vos semper ament et bonam semper habeatis Fortunam
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78896 From: Maxima Valeria Messallina Date: 2010-07-29
Subject: Test Post
This is only a test post to see if Yahoo has indeed finally fixed my posting problems.
 
Maxima Valeria Messallina




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78897 From: marcushoratius Date: 2010-07-29
Subject: The Collegium Pontificum is Called into Session
M. Moravius Horatianus Pontifex Maximus: Pontificibus, Maximae Valeriae Messallinae, Virgine Vestalis Maximae, Flaminibus et omnibus: salutem plurimam dicit:

Upon the request of Pontifex Cn. Cornelius Lentulus, the Collegium shall convene on Friday 14.30 CET a. d. III Kal. Sext. (30 July) and conclude on Saturday 14.30 CET (31 July).

Due to the need for a timely decision on his requests, only a voting period shall be held.


AGENDA
-------

"1. The Collegium Pontificum authorizes Pontifex Cn. Cornelius Lentulus to stand in for and represent the Pontifex Maximus in the confarreatio wedding ceremonies of these couples: T. Iunius Brutus and C. Lucilia Severa; Ap. Furius Lupus and L. Cassia Dives; M. Octavius Corvus and Ap. Flavia Gemella."


"2. The Collegium Pontificum also authorizes M. Octavius Corvus, Sacerdos Iovis, to represent the vacant office of Flamen Dialis during these confarreatio ceremonies."


"3. The Collegium Pontificum determines that if in the future, a Pontifex Maximus or a Flamen Dialis can not attend a confarreatio wedding ceremony, any Pontifex may be authorized to represent the Pontifex Maximus and the Collegium Pontificum, and another member of the Collegium Pontificum may be authorized to represent the Flamen Dialis. If no other Pontifex is available, any Sacerdos Iovis is permitted to substitute for the Flamen Dialis. All such confarreatio preparations must be announced to the Collegium Pontificum beforehand, and the Pontifex Maximus has to approve the celebrants recommended to perform the ceremonies. If the Pontifex Maximus has any objections against the persons of the celebrants, he must put the question to a vote before the Collegium Pontificum for a determine on whether those individuals can be authorized to stand in for and represent the Pontifex Maximus and/or the Flamen Dialis."
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78898 From: L. Livia Plauta Date: 2010-07-29
Subject: Re: IT and treasury; was (Re: [Nova-Roma] [BackAlley])
Salvete omnes,
I think this one from the original developer of the NR IT system is the most
compelling argument ever made.
I hope everyone is convinced now.
By the way, Cn. Iulius Caesar's comparison with buying a car is incorrect.
If one has to use a comparison, it is more correct to compare NR's situation
with the one of a truck driver whose truck is very old and patched-up and
keeps breaking down. Of course one option is to keep patching it up, but in
the long run it would get more and more expensive, and the risk of a serious
accident would rise. Since the truck is the driver's source of revenue, it
makes sense for him to invest into buying a new one.

Optime valete,
Livia


> Salve Gnae Iuli,
>
>>
>> In the short term we simply have to consider retaining the services of
>> Octavius,
>
> wait.... no. Hell no.
>
> That is not an option. I'm not going to be shackled to this *thing*.
>
> It's gasping, ancient, and in a dying language that I no longer wish to
> spend my
> days immersed in.
>
> I didn't return to this mailing list to try to find work - I have three
> ongoing
> jobs as it is. I am *especially* not seeking a job putting another layer
> of
> duct tape on something I wrote between five and ten years ago.
>
> I also am not willing to facilitate a smooth election this November, for
> that
> will let the Piscinine conspiracy claim that "ALL IS WELL", and the coup
> will be
> swept under the rug. I'd rather sit back and watch the chaos.
>
> If they want to talk to me about converting it to Rails or Django over the
> course of an entire year, then I *might* be interested, but there are
> *lots* of
> people who can do that, with a lot less baggage, and more free time.
>
> I *absolutely* *don't* want the perl and duct tape job, especially given
> the
> events of the last few days.
>
>> I simply don't believe that the only option is to invest $10,000.
>
> The other option is to invest $20K.
>
> T. Octavius Pius has given you an excellent price quote (I am told), and
> if he
> is still willing, you should take it. Yes, I know he's a friend of one of
> the
> conspirators who orchestrated the power grab, but it's for that reason
> that he's
> willing to do the work for half of what anyone else (including me) would
> charge.
>
>> Now the "experts" will probably arrive to convince you of the aboslute >
>> pressing need to waste $10,000.
>
> Much as it pains me to agree with the conspirators, they're right on this
> issue.
> They completely bungled it by failing to work *with* consul Albucius,
> instead
> choosing to bully and then ignore him, but they're right (like a broken
> watch,
> twice a day) on this one thing.
>
> Vale,
> M. Octavius Gracchus,
> free at last, free at last,
> thank gods almighty, I'm
> free at last.
>
>
> --
> Matt Hucke (hucke@...), programmer.
> Graveyards of Illinois - http://graveyards.com/
> "Time is an illusion. Lunchtime, doubly so." - D. Adams
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78899 From: rory12001 Date: 2010-07-29
Subject: Re: ANNOUNCEMENT: Confarreationes in August
M. Hortensia M. Moravio Cn. Cornelio M. Lucretio M. Octavioque spd;
what an incredible event! 3 marriages presided over by a pontifex with the installation of an augur who has travelled all the way from Japan, with the sacerdos Iovis who is training for Flamen Dialis. Truly this is what Nova Roma is all about at its best.
I cannot wait to visit the Sarmati in the future and see how their temple is progressing.
Di nobis faveant!
M. Hortensia Maior
Flaminica Carmentalis

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "marcushoratius" <MHoratius@...> wrote:
>
> M. Moravius Piscinus Pontifex Maximus Quiritibus, cultoribus et omnibus s. p. d.
>
> I am very delighted to announce the following confarreationes:
>
> Titus Iunius Brutus and Gaia Lucilia Severa
>
> Appius Furius Lupus and Lucia Cassia Dives
>
> Marcus Octavius Corvus and Appia Flavia Gemella
>
>
> On 4 August AUC 2763 at Oppidium Poltava in Provincia Sarmatia
>
> The confarreationes shall be performed by Pontifex Cn. Cornelius Lentulus on my behalf, with Augur M. Lucretius Agricola attending at the Sarmatia Days Festival (2-10 August).
>
>
> Additional ceremonies to be performed by Pontifex Cn. Cornelius Lentulus will include the consecration of the Temple of Iuppiter Perunus of Nova Roma. The Pontifex shall also consecrate M. Lucretius Agricola as Augur Publicus of Nova Roma and inaugurate M. Octavius Corvus as an Augur of Provincia Sarmatia.
>
>
> The news of these confarreationes has been doubly pleasing for me. It is very heartening to see the religio Romana progressing in living communities as these ceremonies demonstrate. By co-incidence the date chosen for these weddings is also the day I shall be celebrating my own thirty-seventh wedding anniversary. So it comes on a most propitious day for me. I wish Titus and Gaia, Appius and Lucia, Marcus and Appia as much happiness as I have shared over the many years with my wife. And I ask all cultores Deorum to join me in sending these Romani your best wishes.
>
>
> Di Deaeque vos semper ament et bonam semper habeatis Fortunam
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78900 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2010-07-30
Subject: Re: [NRComitiaCuriata] Comitia Curiata is Now Assembled
I will not sanction imperium for anyone by an illegal summons of the senate.

And it is unconscionable that this antipope is trying to push Nova Roma
closer to a Civil war! I thought a Pontifex Maximus was supposed to be a
bridge builder. Not a bridge destroyer.

Vale,

Lucius Cornelius Sulla Felix
Lictor - appointed by Dictator Flavius Vedius Germanicus.

On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 8:46 PM, marcushoratius <MHoratius@...>wrote:

>
>
> M. Moravius Piscinus Pontifex Maximus Lictoribus omnibus s. p. d.
>
> The Comitia Curiata is now Called to Order for the purpose of investing
> Gnaeus Equitius Marinus, Censoirus et Magister Populi designatus, with
> imperium for the office of dictator.
>
> First I shall address some issues that have been raised.
>
> Gn. Equitius Marinus has been appointed dictator by a majority of the
> Senate. Whether you agree with this or not, that is the fact. We, as members
> of the Comitia Curiata, are bound by the Constitution of Nova Roma to
> perform our duties as lictores curiati.
>
> The Constitution both describes our duties and limits them. First, though,
> IV.B.1 on the extraordinary magistrates, in this case the dictator, says
> that "the Senate may appoint a dictator to . . . hold Imperium . . ."
> Magistrates, whether ordinary or extraordinary, are invested with imperium
> by the Comitia Curiata. That is our main function.
>
> The Constitution describes the Comitia Curiata as well as its duties, the
> main duty being, at III.A.1:
>
> "To invest elected and appointed magistrates with Imperium . . . without
> right of refusal individually or as a body;"
>
> The Comitia Curiata has no power, no constitutional authority to refuse to
> pass a lex curiata de imperio, or to reject a magistrate once elected or
> appointed. No individual lictor may refuse to witness the investure of
> imperium on magistrates whether these are ordinarii or extraordinarii
> magistrates. No lictor may vote against passage of a lex curiata since the
> Constitution does not allow it.
>
> Any lictor who disobeys this injunction of the Constitution by openly
> refusing or neglecting to perform your constitutional duty is always subject
> to removal from office by the Collegium Pontificum. I would hope we don't
> have to come to that. So, if you oppose the dictatorship, just don't post a
> witness statement. And don't tell me or anyone, publicly or privately, that
> you are knowingly not posting a witness statement.
>
> At this moment the Curiata is caught in the middle of things, but it is our
> place to allow others to work out the problems. Our only responsibility for
> now is to perform the duties allowed to the Curiata by the Constitution. And
> the Constitution does not give the Comitia Curiata or any individual lictor
> any choices on performing his or her duty.
>
> Di Deaeque te servent cum tuis.
>
>
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78901 From: Gaius Tullius Valerianus Date: 2010-07-30
Subject: answering the call for the Comitia Curiata
I shall not sanction Imperium for anyone by an illegal summons of the Senate
as part of an attempted coup.

It seems unconscionable to me also that the Pontifex Maximus of Nova Roma
seems determined to push Nova Roma into a Civil War. The fact that session
was illegal is clear, the Pontifex Maximus is clearly aware of the facts and
yet seems to be disregarding the facts. Nevertheless, I have always believed
Marinus to be a man of honor, and I am sure he will refuse to hold office
illegally, and I have no wish to force him to accept office illegally.

I have argued recently that as long as an official is duly and legally
elected or appointed, our laws state that no lictor has right of refusal to
invest Imperium. However, since it is strikingly clear that Marinus is not
duly or legally appointed (nor was the language used in his "inauguration"
correct), I am bound by our laws and customs and cannot legally invest
Marinus with Imperium at this time.

Obviously, if a future (and legal) session of the Senate appoints a dictator
properly, I shall do my duty as a Lictor and invest that dictator at that
time, just as I am doing my duty now - under my oath as a Lictor - by not
doing so wrongfully now.

Vale,

Gaius Tullius Valerianus Germanicus
Lictor Curiatus of Nova Roma


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78902 From: Timothy or Stephen Gallagher Date: 2010-07-30
Subject: Dictatorship
Salvete Romans,

As we are on the brink of a dictatorship, I wanted to post the following message that I send to the Senate list on the 23rd of July. As you can see as of this date I withdrew "my proxy, my votes and my attendance at this meeting because of its illegal nature" I did this long before the voting of this illegal session was concluded.

I stood by that statement then and I stand by it now. The Senior Consul vetoed the session therefore no session.

No one can show any example from Roman history when a Consular veto of his colleague was overturned by the inferior power of the Tribunes. This so call Tribunes report is the worst piece of propaganda I have seen in my eight and a half years of citizenship.

The four Tribunes who have helped to bring us to this point have done so by being willful members of a political alliance, group, party, cabal or whatever name you place on it. They were elected to defend the republic from the misdeeds of Nova Roma magistrates but have become instead the midwifes of her betrayal.

If I am still a citizen come January 1st 2764 I swear on my honor that I will see that these four
midwifes of betrayal are prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law and striped of their citizenship for their natural life.

Valete

Ti, Galerius Paulinus
Senator,
Former Censor, Consul, Praetor and Tribune of the Republic
 
“If I am to be hedged in on every side, to be fretted by the perpetual presence of arbitrary will, to be denied the exercise of my powers, it matters nothing to me whether the chain is laid on me by one or many, by king or people. A despot is not more tolerable for his many heads.”
WILLIAM E. CHANNING, Thoughts



To: senatusromanus@yahoogroups.com; albucius_aoe@...
From: spqr753@...
Date: Fri, 23 Jul 2010 11:38:26 -0400
Subject: [SenatusRomanus] Valid Consular veto of the session has been ignored.





Salvete Conscript Fathers,

We are about to do something that is the most important act any of us have been involved with since we became citizens of Nova Roma. At the end of the day, as much as I would like to support some of the items on this agenda, the truth is that the session has been called in an illegal manner and that a legally valid Consular veto of the session has been ignored.

I for one will not ignore it.

I hereby withdraw my proxy, my votes and my attendance at this meeting because of its illegal nature.

This majority will do as this majority always does. Ignore the law and the constitution.

Valete

Ti. Galerius Paulinus

“His hope was to remind the world that fairness, justice, and freedom are more than words, they are perspectives.”





[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78903 From: Timothy or Stephen Gallagher Date: 2010-07-30
Subject: Tribunician report of the VETOED Senate Should read as follows
Salvete Romans


The Tribunes report of the VETOED Senate session of July 19 � July 25,2763

Should read as follows

Formal debate ended at Friday 00.01 hrs CET Roma, 23 July 2010 2763.
Voting began at Friday 23 July 2010 at 00.02 hrs CET Roma 2763
and was concluded at Sunday 25 July 2010 at 00.02 CET Roma 2763.

The following XIV Senators cast their votes on time.
*KFBQ: K. Fabius Buteo Quintilianus, Presiding Magistrate
*ATS: A. Tullia Scholastica
*CCS: C. Curius Saturninus
*CnEM: Cn. Equitius Marinus
*EmCF: Em. Curia Finnica
*FrAC: Fr. Apulus Caesar
*KFBM: K. Fabius Buteo Modianus
*MAM: M. Arminius Maior
*MCC: M. Curiatius Complutensis
*MHM: M. Hortensia Maior
*MIP: M. Iulius Perusianus
*MIS: M. Iulius Severus
*MLA: M. Lucretius Agricola
*MMPH: M. Moravius Piscinus Horatianus

The following Senatores (XV) did not vote:

*TIS: T. Iulius Sabinus
*TiGP.: Ti. Galerius Paulinus
*CEC: C. Equitius Cato
QSP: Q. Suetonius Paulinus
*CPL: C. Popillius Laenas
*CFD: C. Flavius Diocletianus
*CMM: C. Marius Merullus
*CnIC: Cn. Iulius Caesar
*CVP: C. Vipsanius Agrippa
*DIPI: Dec. Iunius Palladius Invictus
*FlGA: Fl. Galerius Aurelianus
*LCSF: L. Cornelius Sulla Felix
*MMA M. Minucius Audens
*PMA: P. Memmius Albucius
*QFM: Q. Fabius Maximus

Valete

Ti. Galerius Paulinus

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78904 From: Cato Date: 2010-07-30
Subject: Re: Tribunician report of the VETOED Senate Should read as follows
Cato omnibus in foro SPD

THIS listing is correct in accordance with the legal, written objections sent
and received by the Co-Secretary of Nova Roma, Inc. under Title 13-B of the laws
of the State of Maine.

No actions taken in the Senate House between these dates (19-26 July 2010) are
of a legal or binding status, and any future action taken which is dependent
upon them is null, void, and contrary to the laws of the Respublica and the laws
of the United States; continued action in violation of the law should be dealt
with to the fullest extent possible by the laws of the Respublica and the laws
of the United States.

Valete,

Cato

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Timothy or Stephen Gallagher <spqr753@...> wrote:
>
>
>
> Salvete Romans
>
>
> The Tribunes report of the VETOED Senate session of July 19 – July 25,2763
>
> Should read as follows
>
> Formal debate ended at Friday 00.01 hrs CET Roma, 23 July 2010 2763.
> Voting began at Friday 23 July 2010 at 00.02 hrs CET Roma 2763
> and was concluded at Sunday 25 July 2010 at 00.02 CET Roma 2763.
>
> The following XIV Senators cast their votes on time.
> *KFBQ: K. Fabius Buteo Quintilianus, Presiding Magistrate
> *ATS: A. Tullia Scholastica
> *CCS: C. Curius Saturninus
> *CnEM: Cn. Equitius Marinus
> *EmCF: Em. Curia Finnica
> *FrAC: Fr. Apulus Caesar
> *KFBM: K. Fabius Buteo Modianus
> *MAM: M. Arminius Maior
> *MCC: M. Curiatius Complutensis
> *MHM: M. Hortensia Maior
> *MIP: M. Iulius Perusianus
> *MIS: M. Iulius Severus
> *MLA: M. Lucretius Agricola
> *MMPH: M. Moravius Piscinus Horatianus
>
> The following Senatores (XV) did not vote:
>
> *TIS: T. Iulius Sabinus
> *TiGP.: Ti. Galerius Paulinus
> *CEC: C. Equitius Cato
> QSP: Q. Suetonius Paulinus
> *CPL: C. Popillius Laenas
> *CFD: C. Flavius Diocletianus
> *CMM: C. Marius Merullus
> *CnIC: Cn. Iulius Caesar
> *CVP: C. Vipsanius Agrippa
> *DIPI: Dec. Iunius Palladius Invictus
> *FlGA: Fl. Galerius Aurelianus
> *LCSF: L. Cornelius Sulla Felix
> *MMA M. Minucius Audens
> *PMA: P. Memmius Albucius
> *QFM: Q. Fabius Maximus
>
> Valete
>
> Ti. Galerius Paulinus
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78905 From: Cato Date: 2010-07-30
Subject: Re: [NRComitiaCuriata] Comitia Curiata is Now Assembled
Cato Cornelio Sullae Tullio Valerianusque SPD

Rest assured that you cannot be forced to break the law; since the actions of the Senate were not legal, anything dependent upon those actions - including an assembly of, and declaration from, the comitia curiata, are likewise illegal.

If anyone tries to force you to break the law, they are guilty of falsum and should be punished to the fullest extent possible under the law.

"FALSVM: It shall be an offence knowingly and intentionally to provide false or misleading information to other persons or bodies in such a way as to ... incite them to perform an action detrimental to their interests." - lex Salicia poenalis, pars altera 16

Valete,

Cato



--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Robert Woolwine <robert.woolwine@...> wrote:
>
> I will not sanction imperium for anyone by an illegal summons of the senate.
>
> And it is unconscionable that this antipope is trying to push Nova Roma
> closer to a Civil war! I thought a Pontifex Maximus was supposed to be a
> bridge builder. Not a bridge destroyer.
>
> Vale,
>
> Lucius Cornelius Sulla Felix
> Lictor - appointed by Dictator Flavius Vedius Germanicus.
>
> On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 8:46 PM, marcushoratius <MHoratius@...>wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > M. Moravius Piscinus Pontifex Maximus Lictoribus omnibus s. p. d.
> >
> > The Comitia Curiata is now Called to Order for the purpose of investing
> > Gnaeus Equitius Marinus, Censoirus et Magister Populi designatus, with
> > imperium for the office of dictator.
> >
> > First I shall address some issues that have been raised.
> >
> > Gn. Equitius Marinus has been appointed dictator by a majority of the
> > Senate. Whether you agree with this or not, that is the fact. We, as members
> > of the Comitia Curiata, are bound by the Constitution of Nova Roma to
> > perform our duties as lictores curiati.
> >
> > The Constitution both describes our duties and limits them. First, though,
> > IV.B.1 on the extraordinary magistrates, in this case the dictator, says
> > that "the Senate may appoint a dictator to . . . hold Imperium . . ."
> > Magistrates, whether ordinary or extraordinary, are invested with imperium
> > by the Comitia Curiata. That is our main function.
> >
> > The Constitution describes the Comitia Curiata as well as its duties, the
> > main duty being, at III.A.1:
> >
> > "To invest elected and appointed magistrates with Imperium . . . without
> > right of refusal individually or as a body;"
> >
> > The Comitia Curiata has no power, no constitutional authority to refuse to
> > pass a lex curiata de imperio, or to reject a magistrate once elected or
> > appointed. No individual lictor may refuse to witness the investure of
> > imperium on magistrates whether these are ordinarii or extraordinarii
> > magistrates. No lictor may vote against passage of a lex curiata since the
> > Constitution does not allow it.
> >
> > Any lictor who disobeys this injunction of the Constitution by openly
> > refusing or neglecting to perform your constitutional duty is always subject
> > to removal from office by the Collegium Pontificum. I would hope we don't
> > have to come to that. So, if you oppose the dictatorship, just don't post a
> > witness statement. And don't tell me or anyone, publicly or privately, that
> > you are knowingly not posting a witness statement.
> >
> > At this moment the Curiata is caught in the middle of things, but it is our
> > place to allow others to work out the problems. Our only responsibility for
> > now is to perform the duties allowed to the Curiata by the Constitution. And
> > the Constitution does not give the Comitia Curiata or any individual lictor
> > any choices on performing his or her duty.
> >
> > Di Deaeque te servent cum tuis.
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78906 From: Publius Memmius Albucius Date: 2010-07-30
Subject: Re: [SenatusRomanus] Tribunician report for July session of the Sena
Consular statement



I take good notice of the "report" below, by which Tribune Corvus informs our Plebs of the result of the so-called Senate session held, on an inconstitutional base, on the dates mentioned below.



I note that the Tribune does not remind that I vetoed the convening of this meeting called by my colleague Fabius Buteo Quintilianus along with Tribunes Max. Valeria Messallina, C. Curius Saturninus, C. Aquillius Rota, M. Octavius Corvus, in full violation of Roman constitutional separation of the curule magistracies and of the tribunate. He thus does not recall that this veto prevent constitutionally every legal session of the Senate and makes void any so-called decision that such a meeting would have "taken".



I also note that, inserting the name of the fifth and opposing Tribune, Petronius, at the bottom of the report, the author acts as if he would tried to make believe the Plebs and the People that Tribune Petronius did not oppose to the move of his colleagues.



I record that, issuing such a "report", Tribune Octavius presents the last illegally called meeting as an ordinary session that would have normal legal effects though this meeting has been vetoed by me, and thus bring, as well as his colleagues, his active support to an inconstitutional dictatorship.



I can but just take notice that tribune Octavius, and every of the three other signing tribunes, who have convened illegally the Senate, are thus committed an additional violation of Nova Roma Constitution and may be held personally responsible of their acts towards the laws of the Republic.



Every citizen or ally of Nova Roma, nor every member of NR Inc. corporation is recommended to take no consideration of Tribune Octavius "report", which does not bind the Republic of Nova Roma nor NR Inc. , either in the frame of NR Roman Law or towards national incorporation U.S. Maine laws.





P. Memmius Albucius

consul maior







To: SenatusRomanus@yahoogroups.com
From: corvvs@...
Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2010 03:59:27 +0000
Subject: [SenatusRomanus] Tribunician report for July session of the Senate






Honorable fathers, please find below the Tribunician report for July session of the Senate. I will wait for your comments before posting it to ML.

***********

Tribunus Plebis Marcus Octavius Corvus Quiritibus S.P.D.

Citizens of Nova Roma,

Here is the Tribunician report of the Senate session of July 19 � July 25,
2763

The votes have been tallied and the results are as follows:

Formal debate ended at Friday 00.01 hrs CET Roma, 23 July 2010 2763.
Voting began at Friday 23 July 2010 at 00.02 hrs CET Roma 2763
and was concluded at Sunday 25 July 2010 at 00.02 CET Roma 2763.

The following XX Senators cast their votes on time. They are referred to by
their initials which are listed in alphabetical order (with the exception of the
presiding magistrate who will be listed first):

*KFBQ: K. Fabius Buteo Quintilianus, Presiding Magistrate
C0-presiding magistrates:
Max. Valeria Messallina, Tribuna Plebis
C. Curius Saturninus, Tribunus Plebis
C. Aquillius Rota, Tribunus Plebis
M. Octavius Corvus, Tribunus Plebis

*ATS: A. Tullia Scholastica
*CCS: C. Curius Saturninus
*CEC: C. Equitius Cato
*CnEM: Cn. Equitius Marinus
*CPL: C. Popillius Laenas
*EmCF: Em. Curia Finnica
*FrAC: Fr. Apulus Caesar
*KFBM: K. Fabius Buteo Modianus
*MAM: M. Arminius Maior
*MCC: M. Curiatius Complutensis
*MHM: M. Hortensia Maior
*MIP: M. Iulius Perusianus
*MIS: M. Iulius Severus
*MLA: M. Lucretius Agricola
*MMPH: M. Moravius Piscinus Horatianus
*QSP: Q. Suetonius Paulinus
*TiGP.: Ti. Galerius Paulinus
*TIS: T. Iulius Sabinus

The following Senator (I) voted by proxy:
*ArnMA: Arn. Moravia Aurelia (Proxy vote delivered by K. Fabius Buteo Quintilianus)

The following Senatores (X) did not vote:

*CFD: C. Flavius Diocletianus
*CMM: C. Marius Merullus
*CnIC: Cn. Iulius Caesar
*CVP: C. Vipsanius Agrippa
*DIPI: Dec. Iunius Palladius Invictus
*FlGA: Fl. Galerius Aurelianus
*LCSF: L. Cornelius Sulla Felix
*MMA M. Minucius Audens
*PMA: P. Memmius Albucius
*QFM: Q. Fabius Maximus

_________________________________________

"VTI ROGAS" indicates a vote in favor of an item,
"ANTIQVO" is a vote against,
"ABSTINEO" is an open abstention.
__________________________________________

All decisions were made with a majority of Uti Rogas votes.

Item I. Proposal for Lex Fabia de magistratibus ordinariis ineundis.

Correction of the Constitution IV, a:
"Elections of the ordinarii shall take place no later than December
15th, and newly-elected officials shall assume their offices on
January 1st."

Lex Fabia de magistratibus ordinariis ineundis.

"Elections of the ordinarii shall take place no later than December
1st, and newly-elected officials shall assume their offices on January
1st, except Plebeian Aediles and Tribunes of the Plebs who shall assume
their offices on December 10th."

UTI ROGAS: 17
ANTIQUO: 0
ABSTINEO: 3

The result of the voting is Item I PASSED

KFBM: On both items I vote UTI ROGAS.

KFBQ: Item I. Proposal for Lex Fabia de magistratibus ordinariis ineundis. UTI ROGAS

MHM: Item I. Proposal for Lex Fabia de magistratibus ordinariis ineundis. UTI ROGAS
CnEM: I Uti Rogas
MLA: Item I. Proposal for Lex Fabia de magistratibus ordinariis ineundis. UTI ROGAS. Although I am a patrician myself I am happy to lend my vote to this fine lex which moves us closer to historical practice and I think may provide a help in smoothing our annual transition of magistrates.
MMPH: Item I. For the proposed Lex Fabia de magistratibus ordinariis ineundis. ADSENTIOR UTI ROGAS
CPL: I Uti Rogas
TiGP: Uti Rogas on all three agenda items.
*Later withdrew his votes: ABSTINEO
ATS: Item I: Uti rogas. This is long overdue, and should bring us closer to ancient Roman practice.
MIS: Item I. For the proposed Lex Fabia de magistratibus ordinariis ineundis. ADSENTIOR VTI ROGAS
CCS: Item I: Proposal for Lex Fabia de magistratibus ordinariis ineundis Uti rogas.

TIS: Item I. Proposal for Lex Fabia de magistratibus ordinariis ineundis. Uti rogas.

*Later withdrew his votes: ABSTINEO
ArnMA: Item I. Proposal for Lex Fabia de magistratibus ordinariis ineundis. UTI ROGAS

MCC: Item I. Proposal for Lex Fabia de magistratibus ordinariis ineundis. UTI ROGAS

QSP: > I Uti Rogas>

MIP: Item I. Proposal for Lex Fabia de magistratibus ordinariis ineundis. VTI ROGAS

EmCF: Item I: Proposal for Lex Fabia de magistratibus ordinariis ineundis Uti rogas.

FrAC: Item I1. Proposal for Lex Fabia de magistratibus ordinariis ineundis. VTI ROGAS

CEC: Item I - VTI ROGAS

*Later withdrew his votes: ABSTINEO
MAM: Item I. Proposal for Lex Fabia de magistratibus ordinariis ineundis. Uti Rogas.

_________________________________________

Item II. The IT-project

The Senate appoints Kristoffer From (formerly known within Nova Roma
as Senator Titus Octavius Pius Ahenobarbus) as the programmer who will
develop and set up a new IT-system, consisting of an automated
election-system and a new citizen database with tools for our
magistrates and citizens.

The Senate affirms that the cost for the IT-project executed by
KristofferFrom will be paid for with 10 000 USD.

The Senate requests the project to be completed in time for the fall
elections in November 2010, but understands that if the new system is
not ready in time, Kristoffer From will arrange the elections and run-
off elections in the current system. Kristoffer From will, in addition
to the fall elections and run-off elections, set up no more than one
session in each Comitia each month during his work on the project.

The Senate orders the CIO to choose the most advantageous pay model
for Nova Roma, either the mentioned Swedish NPO or another solution.
Guarantees by the CIO will be given to assure that any chosen solution
is irreproachable. A registered accountant who will check on the
correctness may need separate pay though.

Kristoffer From will leave reports on the progress of the project to
the CIO who will share these reports with the Senate. There will be
five such short reports, these reports will be sent to the CIO at the
following occasions and when the following milestones are completed
(but probably not working together yet):

1. Database (the backbone of the new site)
2. Access control (a basic website with an authentication method)
3. Server-side daemon (to enable automation of time-sensitive tasks)
4. Election system (automated running of elections)
5. Administrative tools (so magistrates can access the system)
6. Documentation (so Kristoffer is not the only one who knows how it
works)

These milestones may be reported in any order and they only have a
partial connection to the payment of Kristoffer From. The reports will
serve the purpose of keeping the Senate informed of progress of the
IT-project. Still, the work is too complicated to connect the
milestones too strictly to payments.

Kristoffer From may report on the milestones in any order, as they are
reached. The last payment will however not be made until the CIO has
stated that the work is finished.

The Senate orders the CFO or someone appointed/approved by the Senate
instead of a CFO to immediately set aside the full 10 000 USD and upon
the start of the project pay 2 500 USD for salary, social costs and
taxes for Kristoffer From. The next payment of 2500 will be paid as
soon as Kristoffer From reports on one milestone and a third payment
of 2 500 USD will be paid as soon as Kristoffer From reports on a
second milestone. When the project is completed to the satisfaction of
the CIO, the remaining 2 500 USD will be paid according to the chosen
pay-model.

Kristoffer From will do after-work checks and surveillance checks for
at least three months to see to it that the new IT-system really
works in actual use. Nova Roma may also be asked to assist in
performing tests of the system during this period.

Uti rogas: 16
Antiquo: 0
Abstineo: 4
The result of the voting is Item II PASSED

KFBM: On both items I vote UTI ROGAS.

KFBQ: Item II. The IT-project UTI ROGAS

MHM: Item II. The IT-project UTI ROGAS
CnEM: I Uti Rogas
MLA: Item II. The IT-project UTI ROGAS. I have had a closer view than most as this project has gone ahead. Saturninus has done a top-rate job and I am happy to lend my vote in support of this long-overdue measure.

MMPH: Item II. For the IT-project ADSENTIOR UTI ROGAS CPL: I Uti Rogas
CPL: I Uti Rogas
TiGP: Uti Rogas on all three agenda items.
*Later withdrew his votes: ABSTINEO
ATS: Item II: Uti rogas. It seems that we have reached the point where it is better to start anew than attempt to repair the existing programs or whatever despite the expense. Appliances and automobiles have similar problems; we should not expect our IT infrastructure to last forever, no matter how well maintained.
MIS: Item II. For the IT-project MIS: ADSENTIOR VTI ROGAS
CCS: Item II: The IT-project Uti rogas. This is the most important improvement into our infrastructure ever since first Album Civium and Cista.

TIS: Item II. The IT-project TIS: Uti rogas.

*Later withdrew his votes: ABSTINEO
ArnMA: Item II. The IT-project UTI ROGAS

MCC: Item II. IT-project UTI ROGAS

QSP: > I Uti Rogas>

MIP: Item Item II. The IT-project VTI ROGAS

EmCF: Item II: The IT-project Uti rogas. This is an very drastic improvement that can be no longer delayed. The existing system is completely out of date, poorly documented and there is only one individual who is actually able to use it somehow. Wihout a new IT-system there will be no further elections.

FrAC: Item Item II. The IT-project ABSTINEO As professionist of this commercial area, I would like to read the concrete project before to give my approval. The budget in fact is very high and it would be analyzed by a pool of experts.

CEC: Item I - VTI ROGAS

*Later withdrew his votes: ABSTINEO
MAM: Item II. The IT-project Uti Rogas.

_____________________________________________

Item III. Dictatorship

The Senate of Nova Roma, having convened in an emergency session,
considers that:

Whereas the current situation in Nova Roma threatens the very
existence of Nova Roma both as a nation and as a membership
organization, and,

Whereas these crises in our organization and corporation, our
finances, and our technical problems result from many causes that must
be addressed so as to avoid Nova Roma from harm, as well as to ensure
the orderly and enjoyable continuation of Nova Roma, and,

Whereas any solutions to these present crises should and must be done
in accordance with the governing bodies of law,

Do we, the Senate of Nova Roma, by the vote of a majority, hereby
appoint Gnaeus Equitius Marinus to the office of Dictator, and invest
in him complete auctoritas and imperium for a period of no more than
six months, trusting in him to resolve the present crises and take
whatever steps he deems necessary to prevent future harm to the Res
Publica Populi Novae Romae.

The Senate conveys resolution of the following tasks, although not
limited to these alone, to Cn. Equitius Marinus:

To oversee the rewriting of corporate bylaws for Nova Roma, Inc

To have the Constitution and subordinate laws reviewed for the purpose
of amending or replacing them as are necessary to protect the
respublica from harm

To resolve the IT issues that threaten our website and on which the
functions of the respublica rely

To restructure voting procedures to make them robust against loss of
technical programs or equipment.

To simplify the magisterial structure to provide fewer magistrates
with better defined roles.

In the name of the Senate and the People of the Nova Roma, and in the
sight of the Gods and Goddesses of the People of Nova Roma, under the
provision of the Constitution IV.B.1, Gnaeus Equitius Marinus,
Censorius is hereby appointed Dictator and Magister Populi of Nova Roma.

Uti rogas: 16
Antiquo: 1
Abstineo: 3
The result of the voting is Item III PASSED

KFBM: Rather, on all three items I vote UTI ROGAS.

KFBQ: Item III. Dictatorship UTI ROGAS

MHM: Item Item III. Dictatorship UTI ROGAS
CnEM: III Uti Rogas, and may the Dii Immortales help me
MLA: Item III. Dictatorship UTI ROGAS. Senator and Censorius Marinus is one of the very few whom I could support in this position. In deciding my vote I also consider the manifest desire of the people to put ourselves back on the right track.
MMPH: Item III. ADSENTIOR UTI ROGAS
CPL: I Uti Rogas
TiGP: Now as to the proposed dictatorship. When the Roman appointed a dictator armies were at their gates.
When the Romans appointed their first dictator there was an effort under way to return the kings to power.
A week or so ago I stated on one of the lists that I would not support the appointment of a dictator even if I was proposed as the dictator. My opposition to a dictator has NOTHING to do with Senator Marinus or any other person who might have been nominated. It is based on my belief that while we have problems we do not have a crisis.
I do not see anything that has changed and I vote NO on the proposed appointment of a dictator.
*Later withdrew his votes: ABSTINEO
ATS: Item III. Ut pollicita sum, tertia discessio sequitur. Iterum meá quidem sententiá, interdum aliqua facienda, etsi injucunda. Malim Novam Romam rixis omnino carere; malim omnia sine pervicaciis et obicibus esse si quid alicui displiceat. Infelicissimé, haec ita non sunt, et mutanda. Dictaturae mihi displicent, sed ut videtur, nunc uná nobis opus est. Dolendum'st; sed quae cum ita sint, optio alia abest. Vir quem proposuisti bonus est, et eum honestum arbitror. Assentior, etsi animo sollicito nec laetitiam capiens, ut rogas.
MIS: Item III. Dictatorship MIS: ADSENTIOR VTI ROGAS
CCS: Item III: Dictatorship Uti rogas. It is time to save the republic. It is time to put politics aside and do real things. If accomplishing it means to vote for dictatorship, I'll do it. As a Roman citizen, magistrate and senator, Marinus has my support.

TIS: Item III. Uti rogas.

*Later withdrew his votes: ABSTINEO
ArnMA: Item III.Dictatorship. UTI ROGAS

MCC: Item III. Dictatorship. UTI ROGAS

QSP: > III Antiquo

MIP: Item III. Dictatorship VTI ROGAS

EmCF: Item III: Dictatorship Uti rogas.

FrAC: Item III. Dictatorship VTI ROGAS I don't like the dictatorship, my own personal political opinion would drive me to more democratical and popular kinds of governments. But the situation of NR is bad, I'm looking the organization from a more far point of view and I find again a disorganized group divided by superficial discussions and political games. I hope the good Marinus would concentrate his efforts to find a new identity to NR, a real mission in a real world for the members, concrete and "unvirtual" opportunities and projects. The way taken by NR during the last year is the worst road, we need a change of direction. Marinus, please, do it!

CEC: ITEM III - Although I do not go to the extreme that Gn. Iulius Caesar does, I
cannot help but agree that each "crisis" we are called upon to deal now with was
brought up in one form or another and those who did so were mocked or ignored
because of political convenience. I think this because I was, of course, one of
them; exempli gratia, I have advocated for the by-laws change for *years* now,
offering my proposals repeatedly and simply being ignored. Our compliance with
Maine law was brought up repeatedly (again, by myself among others) - only to be
scoffed at and ignored because those in power disliked the messengers rather
than paying attention to the message. So my personal feelings urge me to refuse
to allow those in power to stand back and make someone else responsible for
cleaning up the messes they have made.

Yet, the Romans themselves did not look with horror at the idea of a dictator,
probably because they had no experience with our common modern understanding of
dictatorial government, with Hitler, Stalin, Tito, Ceaucescu, Peron, Pol Pot,
Castro, etc., standing in our collective modern consciousness as the epitome of
governments marked by arbitrary cruelty and inhumanity. The Romans appointed
dictators not only to carry out wars but often to simply get a particular job
done: to fill vacancies in the Senate, to preside over public games, to create
holidays...even just to drive a nail into the door of the temple of Iuppiter
O.M. in times of plague. They did their job, and unless they were a Sulla or a
Marius or a Caesar, when it was finished they simply stepped back down into
regular public life.

So while I do believe that this series of "crises" has been manufactured by
willful ignorance or blatant disregard on the part of some of those who have
held the reins of power over the past two years, I cannot justify standing in
the way of what is apparently the only solution that will hopefully make - force
- those who hold power to shut up and actually listen for a change. The end
does *not* justify the means, but simple dislike for the means does not make
them evil, nor does it justify accepting a crippling status quo, either.

VTI ROGAS

*Later withdrew his votes: ABSTINEO
MAM: Item III. Dictatorship Uti Rogas.

_____________________________________________

Tribuni:

M. Octavius Corvus (reporting)
Maxima Valeria Messallina
C. Curius Saturnius
C. Petronius Dexter
C. Aquilius Rota

I thank my colleague Maxima Valeria Messallina and Senator Marcus Lucretius Agricola for advise and help while preparing this, such a difficult report.

Valete bene in pace Deorum,

M. Octavius Corvus
Tribunus Plebis






[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78907 From: marcushoratius Date: 2010-07-30
Subject: a. d. III Kalendas Sextilias: Battle of Vercellae and Fortuna Huiusc
M. Moravius Piscinus Pontifex Maximus Quiritibus, cultoribus Deorum et omnibus salutem plurimam dicit: Vos vivatis atque floreatis ad plurimos annos.

Hodie est ante diem III Kalendas Sextilias; haec dies comitialis est:: Aquila occidit; significat tempestatem.

"Each person should stay within the limits of his fortune." ~ P. Ovidius Naso, Tristia 3.4.26


AUC 652 / 101 BCE: Dedication of the Temple of Fortuna Huiusce Diei in the Campus Martius

The temple of the Temple of Fortuna Huiusce Diei was originally vowed by Aemilius Paullus, the victor of the Battle of Pydna (167 BCE), who also dedicated there a statue in bronze of Minerva by Phidius. Q. Lutatius Catulus, who was consul with G. Matius in 102 BCE and shared in the victory over the Cimbri at Vercellae, rebuilt the temple after 101 BCE, rededicating it on 30 July. The date he chose was the anniversary of the Battle of Vercellae. He also dedicated two bronze statues by Phidias to the Temple of Fortuna Huiusce Diei. Historians have puzzled over the name, suggesting the name might mean "Fortuna of the passing day," or "Fortuna of this day." It would seem that his Fortuna was connected to specifically fortunate days on which the Romans won victory in important battles. Just as some dates were considered unfortunate due to an earlier catastrophic defeat on that given date, as with dies Alliensis, Fortuna Huiusce Diei represents the opposite notion.


The Trees Protected

"Once upon a time the Gods placed certain trees each under Their care. The oak of Jupiter. The myrtle pleased Venus; Phoebus, the laurel; the pine by Cybele; and Hercules enjoyed the poplar best.

"Minerva wondered, 'Why,' She asked, 'all sterile trees are chosen?' 'The cause,' said Jupiter, 'is plain, lest we see honor given up for gain.' 'Then, Mehecule,' She said, 'let each choose as They wish. The olive tree, for its fruit, I choose.'

"Then the Father of the Gods and men replied, 'O Daughter, You shall justly merit to be called the wisest by all. For if what we do is nothing useful, foolish is the praise.' The fable admonishes us to do nothing that does not bear a profit." ~ Phaedrus, Fabulae Aesopiae 3.17.1


The Eagle and the Roman Standard

"Caius Marius, in his second consulship, assigned the eagle exclusively to the Roman legions. Before that period it had only held the first rank, there being four others as well, the wolf, the minotaur, the horse, and the wild boar, each of which preceded a single division. Some few years before his time it had begun to be the custom to carry the eagle only into battle, the other standards being left behind in camp; Marius, however, abolished the rest of them entirely. Since then, it has been remarked that hardly ever has a Roman legion encamped for the winter, without a pair of eagles making their appearance at the spot." ~ C. Plinius Secundus, Historia Naturalis 10.5

"The Romans are magnanimous. For, whereas nearly all others both in the public relations of their states and in their private lives change their feelings according to the latest developments, often laying aside great enmities because of chance acts of kindness and breaking up long-standing friendships because of slight and trivial offences, the Romans thought they ought to do just the opposite in the case of their friends and out of gratitude for ancient benefits to give up their resentment over recent causes for complaint." ~ Dionysius of Halicarnassus, Roman Antiquities 14.6


AUC 652 / 101 BCE: Battle of Vercellae - Gaius Marius defeats the Cimbrians

"Although away from home, Marius was elected consul for the fifth time. He postponed the triumph offered to him until he had also defeated the Cimbrians. The Cimbrians, who had driven back and put to flight proconsul Quintus Catulus, who had wanted to block the passes in the Alps (near the river Adige he left a cohort that occupied a mountain castle; but by its own valour it broke away and followed the fleeing proconsul and his army), invaded Italy, but [in the following year] were defeated in battle by the united forces of this Catulus and Gaius Marius; it is said that 160,000 enemies were killed and 60,000 captured. Although Marius, welcomed by the applause of the entire state, had been offered two triumphs, he was content with one. The first men in the state, who had until then envied the 'new man' who had reached so many important posts, now admitted that the state had been rescued by him.

"[That same year] Publicius Malleolus, who had killed his mother, was the first to be sewn into a sack and thrown into the sea." ~ Titus Livius, Perioche Bk 68.4-9

Gaius Marius held the Roman left. Proconsul Catulus held the center, and his legate Cornelius Sulla led the Romn and allied cavalry on the right. The Cimbri cavalry fell upon the Roman left, itself taken by surprise in the morning mist. The brunt of the Cimbri infantry attack fell on Catulus. After Marius repulsed the Cimbrian cavalry, he sent his legions onto the center, joining Catulus' hard pressed men. Meanwhile Sulla gained the advantage on the right, to seal off the enemy rear. The Cimbri were annihilated, although their numbers may not have been as high as Livy gave. Marius was the senior officer in the battle, and thus granted a triumph, although the patricians gave credit for the victory to Catulus.


Our thought for today is from Epicurus, the Vatican Sayings 30:

"Some men spend their whole life furnishing for themselves the things proper to life without realizing that at our birth each of us was poured a mortal brew to drink."
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78908 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2010-07-30
Subject: Re: [NRComitiaCuriata] Comitia Curiata is Now Assembled
Then, I think it behooves us to place Piscinus on trial for FALSVM
immediately.

Respectfully,

Lucius Cornelius Sulla Felix

On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 12:37 AM, Cato <catoinnyc@...> wrote:

>
>
> Cato Cornelio Sullae Tullio Valerianusque SPD
>
> Rest assured that you cannot be forced to break the law; since the actions
> of the Senate were not legal, anything dependent upon those actions -
> including an assembly of, and declaration from, the comitia curiata, are
> likewise illegal.
>
> If anyone tries to force you to break the law, they are guilty of falsum
> and should be punished to the fullest extent possible under the law.
>
> "FALSVM: It shall be an offence knowingly and intentionally to provide
> false or misleading information to other persons or bodies in such a way as
> to ... incite them to perform an action detrimental to their interests." -
> lex Salicia poenalis, pars altera 16
>
> Valete,
>
> Cato
>
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com <Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com>, Robert
> Woolwine <robert.woolwine@...> wrote:
> >
> > I will not sanction imperium for anyone by an illegal summons of the
> senate.
> >
> > And it is unconscionable that this antipope is trying to push Nova Roma
> > closer to a Civil war! I thought a Pontifex Maximus was supposed to be a
> > bridge builder. Not a bridge destroyer.
> >
> > Vale,
> >
> > Lucius Cornelius Sulla Felix
> > Lictor - appointed by Dictator Flavius Vedius Germanicus.
> >
> > On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 8:46 PM, marcushoratius <MHoratius@...>wrote:
>
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > M. Moravius Piscinus Pontifex Maximus Lictoribus omnibus s. p. d.
> > >
> > > The Comitia Curiata is now Called to Order for the purpose of investing
> > > Gnaeus Equitius Marinus, Censoirus et Magister Populi designatus, with
> > > imperium for the office of dictator.
> > >
> > > First I shall address some issues that have been raised.
> > >
> > > Gn. Equitius Marinus has been appointed dictator by a majority of the
> > > Senate. Whether you agree with this or not, that is the fact. We, as
> members
> > > of the Comitia Curiata, are bound by the Constitution of Nova Roma to
> > > perform our duties as lictores curiati.
> > >
> > > The Constitution both describes our duties and limits them. First,
> though,
> > > IV.B.1 on the extraordinary magistrates, in this case the dictator,
> says
> > > that "the Senate may appoint a dictator to . . . hold Imperium . . ."
> > > Magistrates, whether ordinary or extraordinary, are invested with
> imperium
> > > by the Comitia Curiata. That is our main function.
> > >
> > > The Constitution describes the Comitia Curiata as well as its duties,
> the
> > > main duty being, at III.A.1:
> > >
> > > "To invest elected and appointed magistrates with Imperium . . .
> without
> > > right of refusal individually or as a body;"
> > >
> > > The Comitia Curiata has no power, no constitutional authority to refuse
> to
> > > pass a lex curiata de imperio, or to reject a magistrate once elected
> or
> > > appointed. No individual lictor may refuse to witness the investure of
> > > imperium on magistrates whether these are ordinarii or extraordinarii
> > > magistrates. No lictor may vote against passage of a lex curiata since
> the
> > > Constitution does not allow it.
> > >
> > > Any lictor who disobeys this injunction of the Constitution by openly
> > > refusing or neglecting to perform your constitutional duty is always
> subject
> > > to removal from office by the Collegium Pontificum. I would hope we
> don't
> > > have to come to that. So, if you oppose the dictatorship, just don't
> post a
> > > witness statement. And don't tell me or anyone, publicly or privately,
> that
> > > you are knowingly not posting a witness statement.
> > >
> > > At this moment the Curiata is caught in the middle of things, but it is
> our
> > > place to allow others to work out the problems. Our only responsibility
> for
> > > now is to perform the duties allowed to the Curiata by the
> Constitution. And
> > > the Constitution does not give the Comitia Curiata or any individual
> lictor
> > > any choices on performing his or her duty.
> > >
> > > Di Deaeque te servent cum tuis.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
>
>
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78909 From: marcushoratius Date: 2010-07-30
Subject: Re: [NRComitiaCuriata] Comitia Curiata is Now Assembled
M. Moravius Piscinus Diribtor Novae Romae Consulibus et Quiritibus s. p. d.

Since I may not be prosecuted while still serving as a magistrate, I hereby resign my office of Diribitor.

I welcome the claim of Lucius Cornelius and I shall file counter claims as Pontifex Maximus on behalf of all Sacerdotes against:

L. Cornelius Sulla and Q. Caecilius Metellus on a claim of SOLLICITVDO

Q. Fabius Maximus on a claim of CALVMNIAE

L. Cornelius Sulla, C. Tullius Valerianus et alia on a claim of FALSVM

L. Cornelius Sulla, Q. Fabius Maximus, C. Tullius Valerianus, and Q. Caecilius Metellus et alia on claims of CONTVMELIA PIETATE and LAESA PATRIAE



--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Robert Woolwine <robert.woolwine@...> wrote:
>
> Then, I think it behooves us to place Piscinus on trial for FALSVM
> immediately.
>
> Respectfully,
>
> Lucius Cornelius Sulla Felix
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78910 From: Maxima Valeria Messallina Date: 2010-07-30
Subject: Re: Claudia Juliana was right
 
















<<--- On Fri, 7/23/10, Matt Hucke <hucke@...> wrote:
>>>luciaiuliaaquila wrote:

The Vestal Virgin and the Consul Quintilianus, our Princeps have been repeatedly insulted and ridiculed. This is wrong. This demonstrates a lack of respect for all  in Nova Roma, a lack of respect for the citizens whose will it was to elect them, the senate who appointed our Princeps Senatus who is the eldest and senior of the Censorii, to the State Religion – the gods themselves, and in turn to our Respublica.<<<

<<Titles do not merit respect.>>
 
 
Really? Did you think that way when you were a senator and being heavily insulted and criticized? I seem to remember it differently.


<<By their fruits ye shall know them.>>
 
Yes, indeed, you shall.


<<They are being held to account for their unethical actions - changing an agenda
in the middle of a senate session and trying to ram appointment of a dictator
through with less than twelve hours of debate.>>
 
 
That is not what happened and I had nothing to do with any of it, but I shall explain my actions as a Tribune in the current situation in another email. (It's too long to post here.) 


 
<<Vale,
M. Octavius Gracchus,
erstwhile Grand Poobah,
Minister in Charge of Putting Things on Top of Other Things,
Born-Again Virgin.>>
 
 
Yes, indeed, by their actions you shall know them, and also in reading between the lines of what they write. Most revealing.
 
Vale bene,
Maxima Valeria Messallina




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78911 From: Maxima Valeria Messallina Date: 2010-07-30
Subject: Re: Claudia Juliana was right
 




<<--- On Fri, 7/23/10, Matt Hucke <hucke@...> wrote:

 
>>>The Vestal Virgins have been continually insulted and offended in Nova Roma<<<

So has everyone else. What makes you so special?>>
 
 
I guess you don't remember that I wrote to you when you posted your resignation from the Senate, and of your citizenship to Nova Roma, and I asked you not to go.  I do remember how you were treated and it was not right. However, Mr. Hucke, in case you never knew this, in ancient Rome, no true Roman ever insulted a Vestal - ever.


 
 
<<What, you think you should be able to participate in public life as a Tribune,
call people "liars", aid and abet the illegal appointment of a dictator, but
somehow be exempt from taking the heat for your actions because you're a "virgin"?>>
 
 
Sir, you presume too much. When I have been criticized as a Tribune, I have said nothing. The Plebians can state their opinions on whether they think I am doing a good job or not. I have never said they couldn't do that - never. However, what I do as a Tribune is apart from what I do as a Vestal (as I have been told many a time by many people, including some of your friends). As a Vestal, I have never done anything wrong and no one has the right to tell me what I am or am not as a Vestal. No one.


 
<<It doesn't work that way. You chose to involve yourself in the fray, you insult
people, you take part in the most egregious abuse of protocol that has ever been
perpetrated in the Senate - but oh no, no one can criticize you, because you've
got a respectable title to hide behind.>>
 
 
 
I hide behind nothing. Again, you presume too much. When have you ever spoken to me about these matters? Never. Do you know my thoughts? No. Do you know all the facts? No. I chose to stand for the office of Tribune of the Plebs to help serve Nova Roma and I have tried to do the best I can. I have been praised and criticized for what I have done and not done as a Tribune. That comes with the office and I have never told anyone they could not criticize me as a Tribune.
 
However, insulting me as a Vestal and insulting the sacred office of the Vestals is something else entirely. You should know that. I shouldn't have to be explaining this to you, a former senator and consul.


 
 
<<I can call myself an invisible pink unicorn, but don't expect immunity from
criticism as a result.>>
 
 
Are you a Vestal, Mr. Hucke? Have you taken a vow of chastity? Do you live you life devoted completely to Great Vesta? The Vestals were many things, but what they weren't was insulted because in ancient Rome, no one would even think to do such a thing. Nova Roma will never thrive when Great Vesta is constantly offended by the shoddy treatment of Her priestesses, which began with the first Virgo Maxima, Flavia Claudia Juliana.
 
I see you are signing with your old Roman name. Have you reapplied for citizenship? Are you returning to Nova Roma? Aventina recently posted her return and reapplication for citizenship. I have not had a chance to say this, but welcome back, Aventina!
 
Vale bene,
Maxima Valeria Messallina 




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78912 From: Matt Hucke Date: 2010-07-30
Subject: Re: Claudia Juliana was right
Maximina,

As you do me the deliberate discourtesy of addressing me by a German name on a
Roman forum, I have nothing further to say to you, and I shall give your message
all the thought and consideration it deserves, which is none.

Vale,
M. Octavius Gracchus.

--
Matt Hucke (hucke@...), programmer.
Graveyards of Illinois - http://graveyards.com/
"Time is an illusion. Lunchtime, doubly so." - D. Adams
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78913 From: Publius Memmius Albucius Date: 2010-07-30
Subject: Re: Resignation as Diribitor
M. Moravio Piscino s.d.



Even if I am surprised by this sudden resignation, considering that the Praetura has received no claim, I nevertheless respect your will and duly record it, from now on.

I thank you, on behalf of the Republic, for all the efforts you did in your office of diribitor, and pay homage to your decision, worthy of a Roman.





Vale Moravi,





Albucius cos.





Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2010 05:45:41 -0700
From: mhoratius@...
Subject: Resignation as Diribitor
To: albucius_aoe@...
CC: c.curius@...; corvvs@...; castra.rota@...; jfarnoud94@...; tau.athanasios@...; marcus.lucretius@...; christer.edling@...; gawne@...; iulius_sabinus@...






M. Moravius Piscinus Diribitor Censoribus, Consulibus, Tribunibus Plebis s. p. d.

Senator L. Cornelius Sulla has called for my prosecution under a claim of Falsum. Since I may not be prosecuted while still serving as a magistrate, I hereby resign my office of Diribitor.

I welcome the claim of Lucius Cornelius and I shall file counter claims as Pontifex Maximus on behalf of all Sacerdotes against:

L. Cornelius Sulla and Q. Caecilius Metellus on a claim of SOLLICITVDO
Q. Fabius Maximus on a claim of CALVMNIAE
L. Cornelius Sulla, C. Tullius Valerianus et alia on a claim of FALSVM
L. Cornelius Sulla, Q. Fabius Maximus, C. Tullius Valerianus, and Q. Caecilius Metellus et alia on claims of CONTVMELIA PIETATE and LAESA PATRIAE




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78914 From: Maxima Valeria Messallina Date: 2010-07-30
Subject: Re: Claudia Juliana was right
 










Salve et salvete,
 
I was not going to answer this email at all because Enodia also sent me some private emails and I've been answering her, privately. I take no offense with Enodia and I now understand why she thought the way she did. I truly value our friendship and I am very glad we are still talking and patching things up.
 
There was a misunderstanding on Enodia's part, and because I think others might also be laboring under the same misunderstanding, I've decided to respond to her public email.
 
During my illness, which began on the 21st of June and from which I am still recovering (although I am doing much better now and Enodia has constantly inquired of my health and sent me many get-well wishes which I have appreciated very much), Enodia had mistakenly thought I had performed public rituals for Nova Roma.
 
Fortunately, during the time of the year in question, i.e., from the 21st of June until August 9th, when my doctor feels I can go back to work (originally, he has said August 2nd, but I saw him this week and he wants me to take more time so I don't have a relapse), there are no public rituals to perform as there are no festivals. The next one is August 21st and I should be well enough by then.
 
Enodia was quite right to point out to me that the Vestals did not perform their duties while they were ill. Those duties, for me, would be performing rituals to honor the sacred festivals of the year in which the Vestals participated (a complete list I have posted on our website) and tending to the sacred fire. As I no longer have my indoor hearth, I no longer have a fire to tend. I am currently using my old lararium, which uses seven-day candles and I was never to ill to light a candle. 
 
However, a Vestal would pray to Great Vesta everyday, sick or not, even if she were removed from the Vestae Atrium  and cared for somewhere else because her illness might be contagious; as all the Vestals could not afford to get sick or who would attend the sacred fire in the Temple of Vesta if that happened? So the only thing I did, and have done, during my illness is continued my daily prayers to Vesta. I was never bleeding or coughing or in anyway polluting my lararium. I kept the prayers short, but I always prayed for Nova Roma everyday. And with the current situation, it seems even more urgent that I do so.
 
My two apprentices also pray to Vesta everyday, as I have instructed them to, and their prayers would be more inclusive of the many needs of Nova Roma, while mine were less so as I kept them very short and that was simply because I lacked the energy to do more. During my entire illness, what has really affected me is the constant lack of energy so common with all the different types of pleurisy, along with the difficulty in breathing if I tried to do anything physical beyond very simple things, like lighting a candle and raising my hands in prayer. So while I have been too ill to go to work, I was never so sick I couldn't say my prayers, and if I had been, I would not have done so.
 
I've had pleurisy before shortly after my father passed away and at that time, I also had walking pneumonia and had to be hospitalized. During that time, I had my first apprentice and she said all the prayers for Nova Roma everyday. However, it took me a lot longer to recuperate from that bout of pleurisy as I was quite ill then and there were festivals that were not honored with public rituals because my apprentice was not a Vestal yet and could not perform the rituals. My paterfamilias was informed of all this.
 
Also to clarify, as I have said, no Roman would ever insult a Vestal, not publicly nor privately, as the Gods hear and know all. If a Roman had any concerns about a certain Vestal, he would take those concerns to the Vestal's paterfamilias -which is the Pontifex Maximus. That is what a true Roman would have done.
 
For the record, I have never insulted Great Vesta. I have never done anything wrong as a Vestal and Holy Vesta is my witness to that, but as many of you have repeatedly told me, what I do as a Vestal is apart from what I do as a Tribune. 
 
What I have done and not done as a Tribune, I shall address in another email, as it is quite lengthy and I am still working on it. I shall resign as a Tribune shortly, but I will always be a Vestal. I have dedicated my life to the service of Great Vesta and that shall continue regardless of any other activity I might engage in for however short a period of time.
 
Vale et valete bene in pace Deorum,
 
Maxima Valeria Messallina
Sacerdos Vestalis
   
 
 


<<--- On Sat, 7/24/10, enodia2002 <walkyr@...> wrote:

 
Hypocrite? So speaks the Vestal who has been polluting her office for weeks by continuing to perform public rites while ill. No wonder Nova Roma is under a cloud. You've been so busy playing kingmaker and slinging mud that you've ignored the basic tenets of your own goddess. Don't whine to me about the mud on your white robes when you've deliberately made the choice to insult Vesta while playing at Tribune. While we've been wishing you well, you've been doing your best to undermine the foundations of Nova Roma and exposing everyone else to your impiety.

Go clean your own house before you lecture others on theirs.

V Rutilia Enodiaria>>




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78915 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2010-07-30
Subject: Re: [NRComitiaCuriata] Comitia Curiata is Now Assembled
Dear Antipope,

First, thank you for including me in such esteem company. I would walk
through fire with any of those gentlemen you listed. (And I believe Q.
Fabius and I have done that very thing more than once). That we are listed
in this manner just shows me that I walk with the company of men I respect.
Thank you for that.

Second, I think you forgot to include Lucius Tiddlypus for giving you the
speeding ticket you got... and Decimus Tertius who did not bow enough when
you hobbled down the street. LOL

Vale,

Sulla

2010/7/30 marcushoratius <MHoratius@...>

>
>
> M. Moravius Piscinus Diribtor Novae Romae Consulibus et Quiritibus s. p. d.
>
>
> Since I may not be prosecuted while still serving as a magistrate, I hereby
> resign my office of Diribitor.
>
> I welcome the claim of Lucius Cornelius and I shall file counter claims as
> Pontifex Maximus on behalf of all Sacerdotes against:
>
> L. Cornelius Sulla and Q. Caecilius Metellus on a claim of SOLLICITVDO
>
> Q. Fabius Maximus on a claim of CALVMNIAE
>
> L. Cornelius Sulla, C. Tullius Valerianus et alia on a claim of FALSVM
>
> L. Cornelius Sulla, Q. Fabius Maximus, C. Tullius Valerianus, and Q.
> Caecilius Metellus et alia on claims of CONTVMELIA PIETATE and LAESA PATRIAE
>
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com <Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com>, Robert
> Woolwine <robert.woolwine@...> wrote:
> >
> > Then, I think it behooves us to place Piscinus on trial for FALSVM
> > immediately.
> >
> > Respectfully,
> >
> > Lucius Cornelius Sulla Felix
> >
>
>
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78916 From: Maxima Valeria Messallina Date: 2010-07-30
Subject: Re: Claudia Juliana was right
I meant no discourtesy whatsoever. I do apologize. However, my name is not Maximina. It's Maxima Valeria Messallina. Thank you.
 
Maxima Valeria Messallina
 


--- On Fri, 7/30/10, Matt Hucke <hucke@...> wrote:


From: Matt Hucke <hucke@...>
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Claudia Juliana was right
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Date: Friday, July 30, 2010, 5:58 AM


 



Maximina,

As you do me the deliberate discourtesy of addressing me by a German name on a
Roman forum, I have nothing further to say to you, and I shall give your message
all the thought and consideration it deserves, which is none.

Vale,
M. Octavius Gracchus.

--
Matt Hucke (hucke@...), programmer.
Graveyards of Illinois - http://graveyards.com/
"Time is an illusion. Lunchtime, doubly so." - D. Adams










[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78917 From: Gaius Petronius Dexter Date: 2010-07-30
Subject: Today Senate is called to vote.
C. Petronius Dexter, tribunus Plebis, Quiritibus Novis Romanis s.p.d.,

As none of my Tribunes colleagues does his duty in reporting the Senate legal session called on July 22 by Consul P. Memmius Albucius,
I make you, citizens, informed that now Senate is called to vote after the contio which began on July 26th:

" The contio is closed since 3 pm Rome time (1h40 ago). Thanks for having taken part to it.

The vote is now open since 4:30 pm Rome time (10 minutes ago).
I remind the 2 items :
item 1 - approving a SCU to appoint by edictum consularis, under your control, our 2 praetors suffecti, on the base of the elements stated by the diribitors
item 2 - approving a SCU on the adaptation of our laws so that we may organize elections normally and not being dependant of the IT tool, and during the time needed to fix our IT system and decide which functions it will answer to.

Our vote will end on next Kal. Sextiles (Aug. 1st) 4:30 pm ROME time (pls check your local time)."

Optime valete.

--
C. Petronius Dexter
tribunus Plebis Arcoiali scribebat
a.d. III Kal. Sext. P. Memmio K. Fabio II coss.


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78918 From: Nero Date: 2010-07-30
Subject: Gay marriage in NR
Salvete Omnes,
With the talk about the Confarreationes in August, I was curious about gay marriages in our community. I doubt that I'm the only gay citizen and so I'm sure that the topic must flit through some minds. Would a priest sanction a gay union? Which of the two would gain the other's titles? Would the religio's ceremony stay the same or would some tweaking have to be done?
DVIC
Nero
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78919 From: Gaius Petronius Dexter Date: 2010-07-30
Subject: Datation question...
C. Petronius Quiritibus omnibus s.p.d.,

Since the beginnig of this year I usually wrote for this year:
P. Memmio K. Fabio II coss. (Under the consulship of P. Memmius and K. Fabius for the second time).

But as it is manifeste that the consul K. Fabius does not want to be consul, he prefers to be replaced by a dictator.
And when he is called by his colleague to calm down the city, he disappeared.
Where is K. Fabius Quintilianus?

Perhaps, I have to write for this year:
P. Memmio et Albucio coss.
(Under the consulship of P. Memmius and Albucius)?

Optime valete.

--
C. Petronius Dexter
Arcoiali scribebat
a.d. III Kal. Sext. P. Memmio et Albucio coss.


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78920 From: Matt Hucke Date: 2010-07-30
Subject: Re: Claudia Juliana was right
On 07/30/2010 08:57 AM, Maxima Valeria Messallina wrote:
> I meant no discourtesy whatsoever. I do apologize.

Accepted, and I apologize for my messages from a few days ago, which I looked
back on mere hours later and thought too harsh. I'll write more on this in
private in a few minutes.

> However, my name is not Maximina. It's Maxima Valeria Messallina. Thank you.

Whoops, sorry; I didn't quote your message in my reply (choosing to forego my
usual point-by-point rebuttal style), so I didn't have your message open as a
reference. No disrespect intended, the name-mangling was unintentional.

Private reply to follow.

Vale, Octavius.

--
Matt Hucke (hucke@...), programmer.
Graveyards of Illinois - http://graveyards.com/
"Time is an illusion. Lunchtime, doubly so." - D. Adams
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78921 From: Gaius Tullius Valerianus Date: 2010-07-30
Subject: Re: [NRComitiaCuriata] Re: answering the call for the Comitia Curiat
Gaius Tullius Valerianus Germanicus M. Moravio Piscino S.D.

I think you have missed the point.

The point is that I took an oath, and you cannot force me to break it.
The point is that your call violates the law, but you cannot force me to
break it. I am a Roman, I shall break neither the law nor my oath.

I was *not*, as you insist, the "first to discuss revolution." Your
intel isn't that good. But I was among the first to discuss rationally what
to do about a situation in which our Pontifex Maximus seems intent on
violating our laws - at that time, in a treasonous way. You yourself once
connived at the removal of a Pontifex Maximus for far less, so I think it
more than a little hypocritical that you take me to task for wanting to obey
the law, and claim the moral high ground for wanting to commit treason
yourself.

You wrote:

> And now you advocate not performing your constitutional duty.
>
This from the man who publicly stated he would not do his! But read what I
wrote. By not sanctioning something illegal, by not breaking the law,
I *AM doing
my Constitutional duty. And I said, should Marinus or anyone else be legally
appointed, I shall do my duty then as now. *


> As I instructed the Lictores earlier, if you oppose these proceedings, keep
> it to yourself. If you post anywhere that you refuse to abide with your
> constitutional duty, you could become subject to removal from office during
> a future session of the Collegium Pontificum. It is not your position as a
> Lictor to interpose yourself into the affairs of the Senate. Let the elected
> authorities work out their differences and there won't be a "civil war."
>
I accept that you and the Collegium Pontificum have the authority to remove
me. I do not accept that this is any reason for me to break oath or law. All
of Nova Roma and its gods stand witness to my position that I am following
the law and my *pietas. *All of Nova Roma and its gods stand witness to the
attempts to bully myself and others into acting illegally and impiously. Let
the elected officials do their job for a change, and there won't be a civil
war.

Vale.



>
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78922 From: Matt Hucke Date: 2010-07-30
Subject: Re: [NRComitiaCuriata] Comitia Curiata is Now Assembled
On 07/30/2010 07:40 AM, marcushoratius prematurely ejaculated:

> M. Moravius Piscinus Diribtor Novae Romae Consulibus et Quiritibus s. p. d.
>
> I welcome the claim of Lucius Cornelius and I shall file counter claims as Pontifex Maximus on behalf of all Sacerdotes against:

You're getting a bit ahead of yourself here - Don't the proscriptions usually
happen *after* a dictator is sworn in?

How nice to see that things are going almost exactly the way the opponents of
the dictatorship anticipated.

M. Octavius Gracchus.
Who can't be charged with nothin',
neener neener.

--
Matt Hucke (hucke@...), programmer.
Graveyards of Illinois - http://graveyards.com/
"Time is an illusion. Lunchtime, doubly so." - D. Adams
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78923 From: Gnaea Livia Ocella Date: 2010-07-30
Subject: Re: Gay marriage in NR
Salve, Nero,

I was just thinking about this a few days ago while reading Juvenal's second satire. He seems to have taken a decidedly negative view of the possibility of gay marriage, but I must not be alone in hoping that Nova Romans are a bit more accommodating and accepting... though the tweaking of an ancient form of marriage dictated by very traditional religious regulations may be a more serious matter.

I am eager to hear the answers to Nero's questions from someone with more knowledge of the Religio and the marriage rites than I. My own knowledge of Roman marriage is limited to the leges put in place during Augustus' time.

Vale, et valete,
Livia Ocella

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Nero" <rikudemyx@...> wrote:
>
> Salvete Omnes,
> With the talk about the Confarreationes in August, I was curious about gay marriages in our community. I doubt that I'm the only gay citizen and so I'm sure that the topic must flit through some minds. Would a priest sanction a gay union? Which of the two would gain the other's titles? Would the religio's ceremony stay the same or would some tweaking have to be done?
> DVIC
> Nero
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78924 From: Belle Morte Date: 2010-07-30
Subject: Official Name Change
Aeternia omnibus in foro S.P.D.

As I am sure many have waited for this day to come. Since being
grandfathered under the Constitution, I was very hesitant upon changing my
Roman Name. And I have been pursued and refused oh so many, but finally Cn.
Cornelius Lentulus finally had the bargaining tool to make me consider such
a thing.

Lentulus studied his adversary well, he deserves much applause and thanks,
for he conquered the Mighty Tigress (okay so it wasn't technically that
epic) with good negotitating, haggling, looking at over 2000 names, and
several Praenomens, and extreme patience we have came up with a new name..

Let it be documented, scribed, tabulated, and remembered, where I was once
Raina Cornelia Valeria Juliana Aeternia, from this day forth and onward.

Statia Cornelia Valeriana Juliana Aeternia.

Now problem is I have to post this on a few more lists and I have three
seperate e-mail addresses to accomadate all my e-mails oh boy...

Thank you for your attention.

Vale Optime,
Aeternia


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78925 From: Gaius Tullius Valerianus Date: 2010-07-30
Subject: Re: Datation question...
Sicut scripserunt Romani antiqui de anno Iulio et Caesare coss.!

Thus did the ancient Romans write of the year Julius and Caesar were
consuls!

(This really was a joke in ancient Rome when Caesar's co-consul was the
ineffective Bibulus, as I am sure Dexter knows!)

Vale!
Valerianus

On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 3:09 PM, Gaius Petronius Dexter <jfarnoud94@...
> wrote:

>
>
> C. Petronius Quiritibus omnibus s.p.d.,
>
> Since the beginnig of this year I usually wrote for this year:
> P. Memmio K. Fabio II coss. (Under the consulship of P. Memmius and K.
> Fabius for the second time).
>
> But as it is manifeste that the consul K. Fabius does not want to be
> consul, he prefers to be replaced by a dictator.
> And when he is called by his colleague to calm down the city, he
> disappeared.
> Where is K. Fabius Quintilianus?
>
> Perhaps, I have to write for this year:
> P. Memmio et Albucio coss.
> (Under the consulship of P. Memmius and Albucius)?
>
> Optime valete.
>
> --
> C. Petronius Dexter
> Arcoiali scribebat
> a.d. III Kal. Sext. P. Memmio et Albucio coss.
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78926 From: L. Livia Plauta Date: 2010-07-30
Subject: Re: [NRComitiaCuriata] Comitia Curiata is Now Assembled
L. Livia Plauta custos omnibus sal.

Great! So now we only have one active diribitor left! This will make things
a lot harder whenever we need to hold elections.

I hope the other diribitors who get the century points without ever doing
anything get very ashamed and decide to work from now on! Unfortunately
there seems to be no way to remove inactive magistrates.

Optime valete,
Livia

----- Original Message -----
From: "marcushoratius" <MHoratius@...>
To: <Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Friday, July 30, 2010 2:40 PM
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: [NRComitiaCuriata] Comitia Curiata is Now Assembled


M. Moravius Piscinus Diribtor Novae Romae Consulibus et Quiritibus s. p. d.

Since I may not be prosecuted while still serving as a magistrate, I hereby
resign my office of Diribitor.

I welcome the claim of Lucius Cornelius and I shall file counter claims as
Pontifex Maximus on behalf of all Sacerdotes against:

L. Cornelius Sulla and Q. Caecilius Metellus on a claim of SOLLICITVDO

Q. Fabius Maximus on a claim of CALVMNIAE

L. Cornelius Sulla, C. Tullius Valerianus et alia on a claim of FALSVM

L. Cornelius Sulla, Q. Fabius Maximus, C. Tullius Valerianus, and Q.
Caecilius Metellus et alia on claims of CONTVMELIA PIETATE and LAESA PATRIAE



--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Robert Woolwine <robert.woolwine@...>
wrote:
>
> Then, I think it behooves us to place Piscinus on trial for FALSVM
> immediately.
>
> Respectfully,
>
> Lucius Cornelius Sulla Felix
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78927 From: L. Livia Plauta Date: 2010-07-30
Subject: Witness Statement from L. Livia Plauta
I, L. Livia Plauta, as a Lictrix of Nova Roma, hereby witness the
appointment of Gnaeus Equitius Marinus as Magister Populi et Dictor of Nova
Roma. As a member of the Comitia Curiata I wish him good fortune in his
office and in his work on behalf of the Religio Romana.



Ego, L. Livia Plauta, lictrix curiata Novae Romae testificor Cn. Equitium
Marinum Magistrum Populi et Dictatorem Novae Romae creari. Lictrix
Comitiorum Curiatorum ei opto ut pro religione Romana felicissime officio
munereque suo fungatur.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78929 From: rory12001 Date: 2010-07-30
Subject: Re: Gay marriage in NR
Salve Nero;
I'm gay and I can tell you the PM Piscinus is absolutely fine with gay
marriage. So absolutely, of course you don't need a priest for Roman marriage at all. Mostly marriage in Rome was by cohabitation. Usus.In ancient Rome when C. Livia married G. Titinius she was still C. Livia, the 2 partners kept their respective names. The children took
the father's name.

In the CP Piscinus is just working on confarreatio, a special kind of marriage ceremony it's for all those couples who desire it. I hope this is helpful, I'm sure the PM will be happy to discuss this. Me too, as Flaminica Carmentalis I have a deep interest in seeing the next generation of Roman children! adoption was a
normative part of Roman family life!
di tibi faveant
M. Hortensia Maior
Flaminica Carmentalis

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Gnaea Livia Ocella" <lbciddio@...> wrote:
>
> Salve, Nero,
>
> I was just thinking about this a few days ago while reading Juvenal's second satire. He seems to have taken a decidedly negative view of the possibility of gay marriage, but I must not be alone in hoping that Nova Romans are a bit more accommodating and accepting... though the tweaking of an ancient form of marriage dictated by very traditional religious regulations may be a more serious matter.
>
> I am eager to hear the answers to Nero's questions from someone with more knowledge of the Religio and the marriage rites than I. My own knowledge of Roman marriage is limited to the leges put in place during Augustus' time.
>
> Vale, et valete,
> Livia Ocella
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Nero" <rikudemyx@> wrote:
> >
> > Salvete Omnes,
> > With the talk about the Confarreationes in August, I was curious about gay marriages in our community. I doubt that I'm the only gay citizen and so I'm sure that the topic must flit through some minds. Would a priest sanction a gay union? Which of the two would gain the other's titles? Would the religio's ceremony stay the same or would some tweaking have to be done?
> > DVIC
> > Nero
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78930 From: Cato Date: 2010-07-30
Subject: Re: Witness Statement from L. Livia Plauta
Cato Liviae Plautae sal.

Do you do so fully of your own free will, knowingly and purposefully, understanding that the Senate actions which have brought you to this point are considered illegal and vacated, contrary to the Constitution of the Respublica?

I just want to make absolutely sure, and I'd like to see it in writing, from you.

Vale,

Cato

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "L. Livia Plauta" <livia.plauta@...> wrote:
>
> I, L. Livia Plauta, as a Lictrix of Nova Roma, hereby witness the
> appointment of Gnaeus Equitius Marinus as Magister Populi et Dictor of Nova
> Roma. As a member of the Comitia Curiata I wish him good fortune in his
> office and in his work on behalf of the Religio Romana.
>
>
>
> Ego, L. Livia Plauta, lictrix curiata Novae Romae testificor Cn. Equitium
> Marinum Magistrum Populi et Dictatorem Novae Romae creari. Lictrix
> Comitiorum Curiatorum ei opto ut pro religione Romana felicissime officio
> munereque suo fungatur.
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78931 From: Cato Date: 2010-07-30
Subject: Re: Official Name Change
Cato Statiae Corneliae Valerinae Iulianae Aeterniae sal.!


And felicitations on your finding the right name for yourself.

Vae!

Cato


--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Belle Morte <syrenslullaby@...> wrote:
>
> Aeternia omnibus in foro S.P.D.
>
> As I am sure many have waited for this day to come. Since being
> grandfathered under the Constitution, I was very hesitant upon changing my
> Roman Name. And I have been pursued and refused oh so many, but finally Cn.
> Cornelius Lentulus finally had the bargaining tool to make me consider such
> a thing.
>
> Lentulus studied his adversary well, he deserves much applause and thanks,
> for he conquered the Mighty Tigress (okay so it wasn't technically that
> epic) with good negotitating, haggling, looking at over 2000 names, and
> several Praenomens, and extreme patience we have came up with a new name..
>
> Let it be documented, scribed, tabulated, and remembered, where I was once
> Raina Cornelia Valeria Juliana Aeternia, from this day forth and onward.
>
> Statia Cornelia Valeriana Juliana Aeternia.
>
> Now problem is I have to post this on a few more lists and I have three
> seperate e-mail addresses to accomadate all my e-mails oh boy...
>
> Thank you for your attention.
>
> Vale Optime,
> Aeternia
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78932 From: Cato Date: 2010-07-30
Subject: Re: [NRComitiaCuriata] Comitia Curiata is Now Assembled
Cato Liviae Plautae sal.

Of course there is, it's in the Constitution:

"Should one of the ordinarii be found to be derelict in his duties, that magistrate may be removed by a law originating in the comitia that elected him." - Const. N.R. IV.A

Vale,

Cato



--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "L. Livia Plauta" <livia.plauta@...> wrote:
>
> L. Livia Plauta custos omnibus sal.
>
> Great! So now we only have one active diribitor left! This will make things
> a lot harder whenever we need to hold elections.
>
> I hope the other diribitors who get the century points without ever doing
> anything get very ashamed and decide to work from now on! Unfortunately
> there seems to be no way to remove inactive magistrates.
>
> Optime valete,
> Livia
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "marcushoratius" <MHoratius@>
> To: <Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com>
> Sent: Friday, July 30, 2010 2:40 PM
> Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: [NRComitiaCuriata] Comitia Curiata is Now Assembled
>
>
> M. Moravius Piscinus Diribtor Novae Romae Consulibus et Quiritibus s. p. d.
>
> Since I may not be prosecuted while still serving as a magistrate, I hereby
> resign my office of Diribitor.
>
> I welcome the claim of Lucius Cornelius and I shall file counter claims as
> Pontifex Maximus on behalf of all Sacerdotes against:
>
> L. Cornelius Sulla and Q. Caecilius Metellus on a claim of SOLLICITVDO
>
> Q. Fabius Maximus on a claim of CALVMNIAE
>
> L. Cornelius Sulla, C. Tullius Valerianus et alia on a claim of FALSVM
>
> L. Cornelius Sulla, Q. Fabius Maximus, C. Tullius Valerianus, and Q.
> Caecilius Metellus et alia on claims of CONTVMELIA PIETATE and LAESA PATRIAE
>
>
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Robert Woolwine <robert.woolwine@>
> wrote:
> >
> > Then, I think it behooves us to place Piscinus on trial for FALSVM
> > immediately.
> >
> > Respectfully,
> >
> > Lucius Cornelius Sulla Felix
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78933 From: Cato Date: 2010-07-30
Subject: Re: Gay marriage in NR
Cato Maiori sal.

If we already have the ancient ceremony of the actual Roman confarreatio, why does Piscinus need to "work" on it? Wouldn't it be more appropriate to use it instead of making something up?

Vale,

Cato

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "rory12001" <rory12001@...> wrote:
>
> Salve Nero;
> I'm gay and I can tell you the PM Piscinus is absolutely fine with gay
> marriage. So absolutely, of course you don't need a priest for Roman marriage at all. Mostly marriage in Rome was by cohabitation. Usus.In ancient Rome when C. Livia married G. Titinius she was still C. Livia, the 2 partners kept their respective names. The children took
> the father's name.
>
> In the CP Piscinus is just working on confarreatio, a special kind of marriage ceremony it's for all those couples who desire it. I hope this is helpful, I'm sure the PM will be happy to discuss this. Me too, as Flaminica Carmentalis I have a deep interest in seeing the next generation of Roman children! adoption was a
> normative part of Roman family life!
> di tibi faveant
> M. Hortensia Maior
> Flaminica Carmentalis
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Gnaea Livia Ocella" <lbciddio@> wrote:
> >
> > Salve, Nero,
> >
> > I was just thinking about this a few days ago while reading Juvenal's second satire. He seems to have taken a decidedly negative view of the possibility of gay marriage, but I must not be alone in hoping that Nova Romans are a bit more accommodating and accepting... though the tweaking of an ancient form of marriage dictated by very traditional religious regulations may be a more serious matter.
> >
> > I am eager to hear the answers to Nero's questions from someone with more knowledge of the Religio and the marriage rites than I. My own knowledge of Roman marriage is limited to the leges put in place during Augustus' time.
> >
> > Vale, et valete,
> > Livia Ocella
> >
> > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Nero" <rikudemyx@> wrote:
> > >
> > > Salvete Omnes,
> > > With the talk about the Confarreationes in August, I was curious about gay marriages in our community. I doubt that I'm the only gay citizen and so I'm sure that the topic must flit through some minds. Would a priest sanction a gay union? Which of the two would gain the other's titles? Would the religio's ceremony stay the same or would some tweaking have to be done?
> > > DVIC
> > > Nero
> > >
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78934 From: Belle Morte Date: 2010-07-30
Subject: Re: Official Name Change
Statia Cornelia Equitio Catoni sal!


Thank you Cato, I'm really liking the new name!

Vale,
Sta. Cornelia Aeternia

On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 4:24 PM, Cato <catoinnyc@...> wrote:

>
>
> Cato Statiae Corneliae Valerinae Iulianae Aeterniae sal.!
>
> And felicitations on your finding the right name for yourself.
>
> Vae!
>
> Cato
>
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com <Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com>, Belle
> Morte <syrenslullaby@...> wrote:
> >
> > Aeternia omnibus in foro S.P.D.
> >
> > As I am sure many have waited for this day to come. Since being
> > grandfathered under the Constitution, I was very hesitant upon changing
> my
> > Roman Name. And I have been pursued and refused oh so many, but finally
> Cn.
> > Cornelius Lentulus finally had the bargaining tool to make me consider
> such
> > a thing.
> >
> > Lentulus studied his adversary well, he deserves much applause and
> thanks,
> > for he conquered the Mighty Tigress (okay so it wasn't technically that
> > epic) with good negotitating, haggling, looking at over 2000 names, and
> > several Praenomens, and extreme patience we have came up with a new
> name..
> >
> > Let it be documented, scribed, tabulated, and remembered, where I was
> once
> > Raina Cornelia Valeria Juliana Aeternia, from this day forth and onward.
> >
> > Statia Cornelia Valeriana Juliana Aeternia.
> >
> > Now problem is I have to post this on a few more lists and I have three
> > seperate e-mail addresses to accomadate all my e-mails oh boy...
> >
> > Thank you for your attention.
> >
> > Vale Optime,
> > Aeternia
> >
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
>
>
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78935 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2010-07-30
Subject: On the Dictatorship
There is no reason that we in Nova Roma should have less Freedom or liberty
than we do in our macronational lives.


Avete Omnes,

In the light the posts of good friends of mine, I felt compelled to speak to
all of you regarding my view of the supposed need for a dictator.

You'll know my name, Lucius Cornelius Sulla Felix. I chose the name because
I highly highly respect the man. He overcame nearly insurmountable odds,
never lost a battle and as his epitaph states, "No Greater Friend, No Worse
Enemy." These are not just words to me but how I try to live my life. He
was a great man - no matter if you try to spit on his memory and acts - he
acted in what he thought was best for Rome and for himself. He fought
against the corruption of political offices and corruption to the Mos
Maiorum and worked through his tenure as dictator to restore the traditions
and legislate repairs to what he saw were breeches in the Mos Maiorum. But
this is not a post about the Great Man. It's is only partly to point out my
similarities that I hope to continue to follow.

However, there are also some very stark differences. I do not know if it has
really escaped anyone's attention but my name is Sulla and I am actually
fighting to prevent a dictatorship? Does that strike anyone as ironic?
But more on that in a bit.

I have had the pleasure and honor of being apart of Nova Roma from her first
day! I remember having to use the post office to surface mail my
application to the New Hampshire PO box way back in 1998. I had the honor
of being the first individual in Nova Roma to complete the entire Cursus
Honorum, the first Nova Roman to complete a full term as Censor, the first
Nova Roman to get elected to the Censorship twice. During that time I
developed great and wonderful friendships; and it was those friendships that
brought me back to Nova Roma after a 4 year absence. My friends G. Popilius
Laenas found me on facebook, my former colleague and close friend (who I
will be seeing for the first time in October) Decius Iunius Palladius
Invictus and Tiberius Galerius Paulinus (and others) got me back going on
the Back Alley. From that point there I have fully become immersed back
into Nova Roma and still essentially arguing many of the same issues that
have been argued for years.

And after about a year and a half after returning we are now being
confronted and told that we NEED a dictatorship. Ladies and gentlemen, I
was in Nova Roma when we had our only Dictator back in 1999. I was a young
"whippersnapper" of 27 years old. I remember the Main List and Religio
Romana list and website being taken off line and locked down and Pontifex
Graecus trying to find a resolution between the various parties involved. I
remember this because I wasn't involved but had to rely on phone
conversations and daily updates from Pontifex Q. Fabius Maximus, as I was
moving. Despite the failed attempt by some individuals to try to link my
involvement, I was not involved. It was precisely because I was not
involved in the events surrounding the civil war that I was able work with
Dictator Vedius in a small capacity in drafting the Vedian Constitution and
was subsequently honored with being elected as Consul to serve with one of
my closest friend, Decius Iunius Palladius Invictus.

The last week or so has been an interesting time reflecting with those of us
who lived through the first Civil War. I have had the pleasure of talking
with both Patres Patriae Marcus Cassius and Flavius Vedius and each time we
talked about the civil war in light of the discussion of the original coup
attempt. And, in discussing the goings on from 11 years ago and comparing
them to today there is no comparison. The government in Nova Roma
functions, albeit in a dysfunctional manner as it has always done. The
senate still meets, the senate still makes decisions. The only real
problem Nova Roma is faced with is the fact that one faction in Nova Roma
has tried to disrupt the progress of Nova Roma - tried to hamstring the
Co-President of the corporation; and when he did not kowtow to them these
same individuals heaped on him repeated insults and indignities; and
now they crossed the line and have tried to impose a Dictator for with no
justification. This is NOT the reason the dictatorship position was created
in either ancient Rome or in Nova Roma. Never mind the fact that this
faction has governed Nova Roma for the past 3 years and during that time
Nova Roma has consistently declined in both infrastructure and in people!

Dictators were selected and appointed in times of serious crises. This is a
tempest in a tea cup compared to the 2nd Punic War. This situation that
Nova Roma is in does not compare to the Civil Wars of the late Republic.
This situation does not even compare to the situation in 1999. In the end,
there is no drastic emergency, no barbarians banging at our gates that would
justify the need of a Dictator. Instead this is a blatant attempt to seize
control, a naked power grab that stinks of rank opportunism. People of Nova
Roma look at your macronational lives. Can you think of any possible reason
that we would be in an organization that offers us less freedoms than what
we are able to live with in our daily lives?

Respectfully,

Lucius Cornelius Sulla Felix


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78936 From: Cato Date: 2010-07-30
Subject: Re: Claudia Juliana was right
Cato Maximae Valeriae Messallinae sal.

"I shall resign as a Tribune shortly, but I will always be a Vestal."

I applaud your decision; not out of any politics whatsoever, but because you have your calling and anything else - anything - is merely an unwelcome distraction from it. Nova Roma is much more well-served by this than having you in any other position at any time in any place.

I sincerely hope that you find peace and that your health is restored to the greatest extent possible.

Vale,

Cato
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78937 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2010-07-30
Subject: Re: Witness Statement from L. Livia Plauta
>
>
> A. Tullia Scholastica L. Liviae Plautae quiritibus bonae voluntatis S.P.D.
>
> Est aliquid praematuritatis hoc in nuntio, Plauta, nam Marinus jusjurandum
> nondum juravit, nec sine nubibus et turbinibus, ut ita dicam, creatus est.
>
>
> I, L. Livia Plauta, as a Lictrix of Nova Roma, hereby witness the
> appointment of Gnaeus Equitius Marinus as Magister Populi et Dictor of Nova
> Roma. As a member of the Comitia Curiata I wish him good fortune in his
> office and in his work on behalf of the Religio Romana.
>
> Ego, L. Livia Plauta, lictrix curiata Novae Romae testificor Cn. Equitium
> Marinum Magistrum Populi et Dictatorem Novae Romae creari. Lictrix
> Comitiorum Curiatorum ei opto ut pro religione Romana felicissime officio
> munereque suo fungatur.
>
>
>
Vale, et valete.



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78938 From: Gaius Tullius Valerianus Date: 2010-07-30
Subject: Re: Witness Statement from L. Livia Plauta
Tullius Valerianus Liviae Plautae S.P.D.

Salve! It is customary to wait until someone has taken their oath of office
to *witness *them taking that oath, is it not? As far as I know, Marinus has
not, and it would be perjury to say you witness something that has not taken
place (the crime under the Lex Salica Poenalis is *falsum*).

The entire Republic holds its breath, believing Marinus is a man of honor
who will not take his oath illegally, let us not try to rush him into crime
and wickedness. He has had enough people trying to manipulate him, for over
a year now, but I don't think Marinus will be their puppet.

Let us see.

Vale.

On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 5:09 PM, L. Livia Plauta <livia.plauta@...>wrote:

>
>
> I, L. Livia Plauta, as a Lictrix of Nova Roma, hereby witness the
> appointment of Gnaeus Equitius Marinus as Magister Populi et Dictor of Nova
>
> Roma. As a member of the Comitia Curiata I wish him good fortune in his
> office and in his work on behalf of the Religio Romana.
>
> Ego, L. Livia Plauta, lictrix curiata Novae Romae testificor Cn. Equitium
> Marinum Magistrum Populi et Dictatorem Novae Romae creari. Lictrix
> Comitiorum Curiatorum ei opto ut pro religione Romana felicissime officio
> munereque suo fungatur.
>
>
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78939 From: Cato Date: 2010-07-30
Subject: On Dictatorship
C. Equitius Cato omnibus in foro SPD

Quirites, I come before you to speak a small bit about dictatorship. Actual ancient Roman dictatorship, rather than the bogey-man of totalitarianism and suppression that we, as modern humans, have come to associate with the term.

I mentioned before, in the Senate House and here in the Forum, that we are conditioned to assume that a dictatorship is, almost by common understanding, an inherently evil and destructive thing.

In its 20th-century guises it certainly has been: Hitler, Stalin, Tito, Ceaucescu, Pol Pot, Castro, and the like have given us a modern concept of dictatorship that is absolutely abhorrent and incompatible (as Sulla has said) with the very foundations of liberty and democracy that we have come to cherish as the ultimate goals of human freedom across the globe, and to which we should never willingly submit.

But is this how the ancients saw it? Did they recoil in horror at the mention of a dictator being chosen to perform one or another service to the Respublica? Was a Roman dictator the epitome of evil that we perceive dictatorship to be?

The short answer is "not necessarily" :)

While Livy does speak of the unease with which a dictator might appear before the People (he was allowed to have the fasces complete with axes borne before him in the City, unlike any other magistrate), and it is repeated often that the dictator could hold office for a maximum of six months - in other words, it was an aberration from normative government - it was seen as a necessary component of government at times. For all that it meant giving up certain liberties (the right of appealing from his decisions is most often mentioned), there were times when a single plenipotentiary voice was seen as necessary. In fact, the Senate actually *forced* the consuls to name a dictator at least once (admittedly at a time when the consuls were fighting very badly amongst themselves and kept losing their battles against the rebelling Volscians to boot).

But Smith's Dictionary also says this:

"...but dictators were also frequently appointed, especially when the consuls were absent from the city, to perform certain acts, which could not be done by any inferior magistrate. These dictators had little more than the name; and as they were only appointed to discharge a particular duty, they had to resign immediately that duty was performed, and they were not entitled to exercise the power of their office in reference to any other matter than the one for which they were nominated. The occasions on which such dictators were appointed, were principally:— 1. For the purpose of holding the comitia for the elections (comitiorum habendorum causa). 2. For fixing the clavus annalis in the temple of Jupiter (clavi figendi causa) in times of pestilence or civil discord, because the law said that this ceremony was to be performed by the praetor maximus, and after the institution of the dictatorship the latter was regarded as the highest magistracy in the state (Liv. VII.3). 3. For appointing holidays (feriarum constituendarum causa) on the appearance of prodigies (Liv. VII.28), and for officiating at the public games (ludorum faciendorum causa), the presidency of which belonged to the consuls or praetors (VIII.40, IX.34). 4. For holding trials (quaestionibus exercendis, IX.36). 5. And on one occasion, for filling up vacancies in the senate (legendo senatui, XXIII.22)."

So it was not only at the sound of barbarians whacking at the gates of the City that dictators were appointed, but also to simply carry out jobs that were of immediate and simple urgency.

In every case, however, a dictator could *only* be appointed after the Senate had met and confirmed to the consuls that they had the right to do so. As Smith's says:

"When a dictator was considered necessary, the senate passed a senatus consultum that one of the consuls should nominate (dicere) a dictator; and without a previous decree of the senate the consuls had not the power of naming a dictator...In almost all cases we find mention of a previous decree of the senate (see e.g. [Livy] II.30, IV.17, 21, 23, 26, 57, VI.2, VII.21, VIII.17, IX.29, X.11, XXII.57); and in a few instances, in which the appointment by the consul is alone spoken of, the senatus consultum is probably not mentioned, simply because it was a matter of course."

So this is my understanding: there were times when it was seen as necessary to give a jump-start to getting things done, and not only in time of war. The Romans turned in an orderly way, reliant upon the processes of law and the authority of the civil magistrates and the Senate, to men who had served the State (you had to have been a consul to be appointed as dictator) and trusted them, for a short period of time, to get the job or jobs done.

Whether or not Nova Roma needs that jump-start is truly at the heart of the debate, and it is a debate worthy of having no matter how you feel about the issue.

What Nova Roma does NOT need is that a dictator be forced down our throats even - apparently - against the will of the person thought to be able to serve in that capacity; and most absolutely certainly not one that is having power thrust at him by a megalomaniacal creature intent only on expanding his influence and authority.

Valete,

Cato
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78940 From: Christina Moseley Date: 2010-07-30
Subject: Re: Official Name Change
Salvete.

So since I'm not the citizen of Nova Roma persay, I prefer to use my gmail
account to sign in into Nova Roma. That should make it easier on you guys
if you want to see if I were eligible to be the citizen of Nova Roma.

BTW, Statia Cornelia. I do like your name.

On Fri, 30 Jul 2010 18:41:52 -0500, Belle Morte <syrenslullaby@...>
wrote:

> Statia Cornelia Equitio Catoni sal!
>
>
> Thank you Cato, I'm really liking the new name!
>
> Vale,
> Sta. Cornelia Aeternia
>
> On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 4:24 PM, Cato <catoinnyc@...> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> Cato Statiae Corneliae Valerinae Iulianae Aeterniae sal.!
>>
>> And felicitations on your finding the right name for yourself.
>>
>> Vae!
>>
>> Cato
>>
>>
>> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com <Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com>, Belle
>> Morte <syrenslullaby@...> wrote:
>> >
>> > Aeternia omnibus in foro S.P.D.
>> >
>> > As I am sure many have waited for this day to come. Since being
>> > grandfathered under the Constitution, I was very hesitant upon
>> changing
>> my
>> > Roman Name. And I have been pursued and refused oh so many, but
>> finally
>> Cn.
>> > Cornelius Lentulus finally had the bargaining tool to make me consider
>> such
>> > a thing.
>> >
>> > Lentulus studied his adversary well, he deserves much applause and
>> thanks,
>> > for he conquered the Mighty Tigress (okay so it wasn't technically
>> that
>> > epic) with good negotitating, haggling, looking at over 2000 names,
>> and
>> > several Praenomens, and extreme patience we have came up with a new
>> name..
>> >
>> > Let it be documented, scribed, tabulated, and remembered, where I was
>> once
>> > Raina Cornelia Valeria Juliana Aeternia, from this day forth and
>> onward.
>> >
>> > Statia Cornelia Valeriana Juliana Aeternia.
>> >
>> > Now problem is I have to post this on a few more lists and I have
>> three
>> > seperate e-mail addresses to accomadate all my e-mails oh boy...
>> >
>> > Thank you for your attention.
>> >
>> > Vale Optime,
>> > Aeternia
>> >
>> >
>> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>


--
Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/mail/
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78941 From: Christina Moseley Date: 2010-07-30
Subject: Re: Gay marriage in NR
What about polyamorous relationships? Me and my boyfriend are getting
married in the Roman marriage first, then in the state marriage. However,
my boyfriend was sure that we can fit another person in there but in
Missouri there is a law against bigamy.

On Fri, 30 Jul 2010 18:35:20 -0500, Cato <catoinnyc@...> wrote:

> Cato Maiori sal.
>
> If we already have the ancient ceremony of the actual Roman
> confarreatio, why does Piscinus need to "work" on it? Wouldn't it be
> more appropriate to use it instead of making something up?
>
> Vale,
>
> Cato
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "rory12001" <rory12001@...> wrote:
>>
>> Salve Nero;
>> I'm gay and I can tell you the PM Piscinus is absolutely fine with gay
>> marriage. So absolutely, of course you don't need a priest for Roman
>> marriage at all. Mostly marriage in Rome was by cohabitation. Usus.In
>> ancient Rome when C. Livia married G. Titinius she was still C. Livia,
>> the 2 partners kept their respective names. The children took
>> the father's name.
>>
>> In the CP Piscinus is just working on confarreatio, a special kind of
>> marriage ceremony it's for all those couples who desire it. I hope
>> this is helpful, I'm sure the PM will be happy to discuss this. Me too,
>> as Flaminica Carmentalis I have a deep interest in seeing the next
>> generation of Roman children! adoption was a
>> normative part of Roman family life!
>> di tibi faveant
>> M. Hortensia Maior
>> Flaminica Carmentalis
>>
>> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Gnaea Livia Ocella" <lbciddio@>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > Salve, Nero,
>> >
>> > I was just thinking about this a few days ago while reading Juvenal's
>> second satire. He seems to have taken a decidedly negative view of the
>> possibility of gay marriage, but I must not be alone in hoping that
>> Nova Romans are a bit more accommodating and accepting... though the
>> tweaking of an ancient form of marriage dictated by very traditional
>> religious regulations may be a more serious matter.
>> >
>> > I am eager to hear the answers to Nero's questions from someone with
>> more knowledge of the Religio and the marriage rites than I. My own
>> knowledge of Roman marriage is limited to the leges put in place during
>> Augustus' time.
>> >
>> > Vale, et valete,
>> > Livia Ocella
>> >
>> > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Nero" <rikudemyx@> wrote:
>> > >
>> > > Salvete Omnes,
>> > > With the talk about the Confarreationes in August, I was curious
>> about gay marriages in our community. I doubt that I'm the only gay
>> citizen and so I'm sure that the topic must flit through some minds.
>> Would a priest sanction a gay union? Which of the two would gain the
>> other's titles? Would the religio's ceremony stay the same or would
>> some tweaking have to be done?
>> > > DVIC
>> > > Nero
>> > >
>> >
>>
>
>


--
Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/mail/
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78942 From: rory12001 Date: 2010-07-30
Subject: Re: Gay marriage in NR
Salve;
Roman marriage was historically monogomous, but feel free to ask the PM his thoughts about it.
vale
Maior

:
>
> What about polyamorous relationships? Me and my boyfriend are getting
> married in the Roman marriage first, then in the state marriage. However,
> my boyfriend was sure that we can fit another person in there but in
> Missouri there is a law against bigamy.
>
> On Fri, 30 Jul 2010 18:35:20 -0500, Cato <catoinnyc@...> wrote:
>
> > Cato Maiori sal.
> >
> > If we already have the ancient ceremony of the actual Roman
> > confarreatio, why does Piscinus need to "work" on it? Wouldn't it be
> > more appropriate to use it instead of making something up?
> >
> > Vale,
> >
> > Cato
> >
> > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "rory12001" <rory12001@> wrote:
> >>
> >> Salve Nero;
> >> I'm gay and I can tell you the PM Piscinus is absolutely fine with gay
> >> marriage. So absolutely, of course you don't need a priest for Roman
> >> marriage at all. Mostly marriage in Rome was by cohabitation. Usus.In
> >> ancient Rome when C. Livia married G. Titinius she was still C. Livia,
> >> the 2 partners kept their respective names. The children took
> >> the father's name.
> >>
> >> In the CP Piscinus is just working on confarreatio, a special kind of
> >> marriage ceremony it's for all those couples who desire it. I hope
> >> this is helpful, I'm sure the PM will be happy to discuss this. Me too,
> >> as Flaminica Carmentalis I have a deep interest in seeing the next
> >> generation of Roman children! adoption was a
> >> normative part of Roman family life!
> >> di tibi faveant
> >> M. Hortensia Maior
> >> Flaminica Carmentalis
> >>
> >> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Gnaea Livia Ocella" <lbciddio@>
> >> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > Salve, Nero,
> >> >
> >> > I was just thinking about this a few days ago while reading Juvenal's
> >> second satire. He seems to have taken a decidedly negative view of the
> >> possibility of gay marriage, but I must not be alone in hoping that
> >> Nova Romans are a bit more accommodating and accepting... though the
> >> tweaking of an ancient form of marriage dictated by very traditional
> >> religious regulations may be a more serious matter.
> >> >
> >> > I am eager to hear the answers to Nero's questions from someone with
> >> more knowledge of the Religio and the marriage rites than I. My own
> >> knowledge of Roman marriage is limited to the leges put in place during
> >> Augustus' time.
> >> >
> >> > Vale, et valete,
> >> > Livia Ocella
> >> >
> >> > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Nero" <rikudemyx@> wrote:
> >> > >
> >> > > Salvete Omnes,
> >> > > With the talk about the Confarreationes in August, I was curious
> >> about gay marriages in our community. I doubt that I'm the only gay
> >> citizen and so I'm sure that the topic must flit through some minds.
> >> Would a priest sanction a gay union? Which of the two would gain the
> >> other's titles? Would the religio's ceremony stay the same or would
> >> some tweaking have to be done?
> >> > > DVIC
> >> > > Nero
> >> > >
> >> >
> >>
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/mail/
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78943 From: Belle Morte Statia Date: 2010-07-31
Subject: Re: Official Name Change
Aeternia Tiberiae Octaviae Acueloni (?) sal:

Thank you! I love your name sounds totally fierce :-)


Vale,
Statia Cornelia Aeternia



On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 6:11 PM, Christina Moseley
<cheetahgirl5@...>wrote:

> Salvete.
>
> So since I'm not the citizen of Nova Roma persay, I prefer to use my gmail
> account to sign in into Nova Roma. That should make it easier on you guys
> if you want to see if I were eligible to be the citizen of Nova Roma.
>
> BTW, Statia Cornelia. I do like your name.
>
> On Fri, 30 Jul 2010 18:41:52 -0500, Belle Morte <syrenslullaby@...>
> wrote:
>
> > Statia Cornelia Equitio Catoni sal!
> >
> >
> > Thank you Cato, I'm really liking the new name!
> >
> > Vale,
> > Sta. Cornelia Aeternia
> >
> > On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 4:24 PM, Cato <catoinnyc@...> wrote:
> >
> >>
> >>
> >> Cato Statiae Corneliae Valerinae Iulianae Aeterniae sal.!
> >>
> >> And felicitations on your finding the right name for yourself.
> >>
> >> Vae!
> >>
> >> Cato
> >>
> >>
> >> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com <Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com>, Belle
> >> Morte <syrenslullaby@...> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > Aeternia omnibus in foro S.P.D.
> >> >
> >> > As I am sure many have waited for this day to come. Since being
> >> > grandfathered under the Constitution, I was very hesitant upon
> >> changing
> >> my
> >> > Roman Name. And I have been pursued and refused oh so many, but
> >> finally
> >> Cn.
> >> > Cornelius Lentulus finally had the bargaining tool to make me consider
> >> such
> >> > a thing.
> >> >
> >> > Lentulus studied his adversary well, he deserves much applause and
> >> thanks,
> >> > for he conquered the Mighty Tigress (okay so it wasn't technically
> >> that
> >> > epic) with good negotitating, haggling, looking at over 2000 names,
> >> and
> >> > several Praenomens, and extreme patience we have came up with a new
> >> name..
> >> >
> >> > Let it be documented, scribed, tabulated, and remembered, where I was
> >> once
> >> > Raina Cornelia Valeria Juliana Aeternia, from this day forth and
> >> onward.
> >> >
> >> > Statia Cornelia Valeriana Juliana Aeternia.
> >> >
> >> > Now problem is I have to post this on a few more lists and I have
> >> three
> >> > seperate e-mail addresses to accomadate all my e-mails oh boy...
> >> >
> >> > Thank you for your attention.
> >> >
> >> > Vale Optime,
> >> > Aeternia
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------------
> >
> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/mail/
>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78944 From: Susan Date: 2010-07-31
Subject: Re: On Dictatorship
Pompeia Minucia Strabo C. Equito Catoni Quiritibus Novae Romae S.P.D.

Senator Cato, I do not want you to think that I am attempting to provoke argument, certainly not. Your post on the theoretical aspects of Dictatorship is very informative. However, I'd like to expand on this statement, which you've expressed below. I feel compelled to:

"What Nova Roma does NOT need is that a dictator be forced down our throats even
- apparently - against the will of the person thought to be able to serve in
that capacity; and most absolutely certainly not one that is having power thrust
at him by a megalomaniacal creature intent only on expanding his influence and
authority."

Respondeo:

I'm afraid I have difficulty envisioning our Dictator Hopeful as being somehow forced into this scenario. He voted for himself as Dictator, without a mention of concern regarding the illegality of these arrangements. He asked the Gods to help him, which I'm sure won the hearts of a few, but this does not make for proper procedure, or divine approval of inappropriate proceedings. I can actually see the Tribunes being confused on the law (why I've asked the Plebian Assembly on a few occasions to revisit the criteria for Tribune candidacy), but I cannot buy into these legal oversights by any magistrate who has climbed the complete cursus, and one who has in fact corrected me once or twice regarding the constitutional circumstances under which Tribunes may summon the Senate...it is certainly not global matters such as Dictatorship and Big Ticket Expenditures to the tune of 10K.

PLEASE keep in mind that 50% of tax money is money belonging to the provincia. That said, the general treasury would be depleted with 10K spent, or nearly.

Soooo, with respect,I am afraid I can't buy into the "honorable and the innocent" explanation for our Dictator Hopeful.

I invite Marinus Dictator Hopeful to issue a public statement explaining his actions, particularly his sudden (cumulative?) loss of appreciation of Nova Roma law. or the macronational ramifications of current misbehaviours. He was recently quoted in this forum as saying (to Senators) that, (paraphrased) whatever the Tribunes regarded as constitutional, *was* constitutional, in complete contradiction to the excellent command of NR law he's displayed electronically in the past.

To expand a bit on the otherwise theoretical, and well-appreciated points of Senator Cato, there was, as Cato discusses, *usually* a specific agenda for Dictator in Ancient Rome.... But certainly not always.


In Nova Roma though, an *emergency* is realized, and that is the indication for consideration by the Senate for a Dictator. Said Dictator carries on for six months, as did Sulla of old, doing what he feels is necessary for NR, subject to ratification by the Senate.

But...Oooooh and this is a BIG BUT....

By the NR Constitution, the same Senators who gave the Dictator this power don't have to be the same Senators who approve his edicts. Theoretically, there is nothing to stop said Dictator from 'dismissing", "removing", "purging", whatever, ANY Senator (or citizen) who doesn't agree with his agenda, so when it comes time to ratify his edicts at the end of the six months, the Senate has radically changed in membership, populated only by those who will give approval to whatever he's mandated. There is the catch 22.

Thank goodness the proceedings are illegal, because if honoured, they could prove to be very costly to Nova Roma, in more ways than one.

Why do I care...I quit right? Well, I didn't quit caring, I just don't like to play in a muddy playground. Especially when (especially as a Senator) I could be held legally accountable for other peoples' malfeasance. And that's all I've seen since 2008. I was hoping NR would never be a game to the extent of this kind of con. I am truly hoping she can be salvaged, for the enjoyment of her citizens. *all* her citizens.

valete omnes, and in good faith









--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Cato" <catoinnyc@...> wrote:
>
> C. Equitius Cato omnibus in foro SPD
>
> Quirites, I come before you to speak a small bit about dictatorship. Actual ancient Roman dictatorship, rather than the bogey-man of totalitarianism and suppression that we, as modern humans, have come to associate with the term.
>
> I mentioned before, in the Senate House and here in the Forum, that we are conditioned to assume that a dictatorship is, almost by common understanding, an inherently evil and destructive thing.
>
> In its 20th-century guises it certainly has been: Hitler, Stalin, Tito, Ceaucescu, Pol Pot, Castro, and the like have given us a modern concept of dictatorship that is absolutely abhorrent and incompatible (as Sulla has said) with the very foundations of liberty and democracy that we have come to cherish as the ultimate goals of human freedom across the globe, and to which we should never willingly submit.
>
> But is this how the ancients saw it? Did they recoil in horror at the mention of a dictator being chosen to perform one or another service to the Respublica? Was a Roman dictator the epitome of evil that we perceive dictatorship to be?
>
> The short answer is "not necessarily" :)
>
> While Livy does speak of the unease with which a dictator might appear before the People (he was allowed to have the fasces complete with axes borne before him in the City, unlike any other magistrate), and it is repeated often that the dictator could hold office for a maximum of six months - in other words, it was an aberration from normative government - it was seen as a necessary component of government at times. For all that it meant giving up certain liberties (the right of appealing from his decisions is most often mentioned), there were times when a single plenipotentiary voice was seen as necessary. In fact, the Senate actually *forced* the consuls to name a dictator at least once (admittedly at a time when the consuls were fighting very badly amongst themselves and kept losing their battles against the rebelling Volscians to boot).
>
> But Smith's Dictionary also says this:
>
> "...but dictators were also frequently appointed, especially when the consuls were absent from the city, to perform certain acts, which could not be done by any inferior magistrate. These dictators had little more than the name; and as they were only appointed to discharge a particular duty, they had to resign immediately that duty was performed, and they were not entitled to exercise the power of their office in reference to any other matter than the one for which they were nominated. The occasions on which such dictators were appointed, were principally:— 1. For the purpose of holding the comitia for the elections (comitiorum habendorum causa). 2. For fixing the clavus annalis in the temple of Jupiter (clavi figendi causa) in times of pestilence or civil discord, because the law said that this ceremony was to be performed by the praetor maximus, and after the institution of the dictatorship the latter was regarded as the highest magistracy in the state (Liv. VII.3). 3. For appointing holidays (feriarum constituendarum causa) on the appearance of prodigies (Liv. VII.28), and for officiating at the public games (ludorum faciendorum causa), the presidency of which belonged to the consuls or praetors (VIII.40, IX.34). 4. For holding trials (quaestionibus exercendis, IX.36). 5. And on one occasion, for filling up vacancies in the senate (legendo senatui, XXIII.22)."
>
> So it was not only at the sound of barbarians whacking at the gates of the City that dictators were appointed, but also to simply carry out jobs that were of immediate and simple urgency.
>
> In every case, however, a dictator could *only* be appointed after the Senate had met and confirmed to the consuls that they had the right to do so. As Smith's says:
>
> "When a dictator was considered necessary, the senate passed a senatus consultum that one of the consuls should nominate (dicere) a dictator; and without a previous decree of the senate the consuls had not the power of naming a dictator...In almost all cases we find mention of a previous decree of the senate (see e.g. [Livy] II.30, IV.17, 21, 23, 26, 57, VI.2, VII.21, VIII.17, IX.29, X.11, XXII.57); and in a few instances, in which the appointment by the consul is alone spoken of, the senatus consultum is probably not mentioned, simply because it was a matter of course."
>
> So this is my understanding: there were times when it was seen as necessary to give a jump-start to getting things done, and not only in time of war. The Romans turned in an orderly way, reliant upon the processes of law and the authority of the civil magistrates and the Senate, to men who had served the State (you had to have been a consul to be appointed as dictator) and trusted them, for a short period of time, to get the job or jobs done.
>
> Whether or not Nova Roma needs that jump-start is truly at the heart of the debate, and it is a debate worthy of having no matter how you feel about the issue.
>
> What Nova Roma does NOT need is that a dictator be forced down our throats even - apparently - against the will of the person thought to be able to serve in that capacity; and most absolutely certainly not one that is having power thrust at him by a megalomaniacal creature intent only on expanding his influence and authority.
>
> Valete,
>
> Cato
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78945 From: petronius_dexter Date: 2010-07-31
Subject: Re: On Dictatorship
C. Petronius Dexter Pompeiae Minuciae Straboni s.p.d.,

> By the NR Constitution, the same Senators who gave the Dictator this power don't have to be the same Senators who approve his edicts.

Yes, of course. I thought everybody had that as obvious. Sulla and Caesar in ancient Rome purged the Senate and filled it with their partisans. The proscription lists are used for that.

Nobody can prevent a dictator to purge the Senate, the album civium, the religious collegia too... The Senate which will give the approval of the dictatorship job after 6 months may be another Senate that the Senate which made him dictator. That is obvious.

Vale optime.

C. Petronius Dexter
Tribunus Plebis Arcoiali scribebat
Pridie Kalendas Sextiles P. Memmio K. Fabio II coss.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78946 From: Susan Date: 2010-07-31
Subject: Re: On Dictatorship
Salve Tribune:

I understand where you think I'm speaking the obvious. Doh :>) Not obvious to all, however. Some are new to ancient history ancient and NR law, and we all have other preoccupations.

Not to be argumentative, but I am not sure if everyone knows how dictatorships sometimes ran in antiquity, or what that title implies in Nova Roma. As I understand history, dictators were often given specific tasks, not always a 'general' agenda. Senator Cato's post is quite informative, for sure. I recommend it.

Moreover, if a Dictator wanted to purge Senators, or do other radical deeds in antiquity, he needed the power (often military) to back him up. If his support was shaky, he'd be dead.

A Dictator in NR has no need for military power...he can just kick you out. And you can't kill him, as in the days of old :>) But he might take your money by a legal sleight of hand. Or misuse it for something you didn't donate it for. Speaking theoretically, without assigning this any one person.

These days, mi Petroni, they don't fortify with legions, they hem you in by legal contact, or lack of 'reading between the lines' :>) Or they try.....

Pompeia

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "petronius_dexter" <jfarnoud94@...> wrote:
>
>
> C. Petronius Dexter Pompeiae Minuciae Straboni s.p.d.,
>
> > By the NR Constitution, the same Senators who gave the Dictator this power don't have to be the same Senators who approve his edicts.
>
> Yes, of course. I thought everybody had that as obvious. Sulla and Caesar in ancient Rome purged the Senate and filled it with their partisans. The proscription lists are used for that.
>
> Nobody can prevent a dictator to purge the Senate, the album civium, the religious collegia too... The Senate which will give the approval of the dictatorship job after 6 months may be another Senate that the Senate which made him dictator. That is obvious.
>
> Vale optime.
>
> C. Petronius Dexter
> Tribunus Plebis Arcoiali scribebat
> Pridie Kalendas Sextiles P. Memmio K. Fabio II coss.
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78947 From: Susan Date: 2010-07-31
Subject: Re: On Dictatorship
Petronius Tribunis sal:

I just realized that in my response to Senator Cato I said 'the Tribunes' when I discussed where I thought they would be confused by the law. In so doing, I associated you with those who recently called the Senate into session under illegal circumstances.

And you are the lone Tribune who has appreciated the illegalities of this recent Senate call and has formally removed himself of this agenda.

I am sorry, and I implied no disrespect. I am more than aware of your knowledge of the ancient ways and of NR law. And I appreciate your recent position on these crutial issues.

mea culpa

Pompeia

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "petronius_dexter" <jfarnoud94@...> wrote:
>
>
> C. Petronius Dexter Pompeiae Minuciae Straboni s.p.d.,
>
> > By the NR Constitution, the same Senators who gave the Dictator this power don't have to be the same Senators who approve his edicts.
>
> Yes, of course. I thought everybody had that as obvious. Sulla and Caesar in ancient Rome purged the Senate and filled it with their partisans. The proscription lists are used for that.
>
> Nobody can prevent a dictator to purge the Senate, the album civium, the religious collegia too... The Senate which will give the approval of the dictatorship job after 6 months may be another Senate that the Senate which made him dictator. That is obvious.
>
> Vale optime.
>
> C. Petronius Dexter
> Tribunus Plebis Arcoiali scribebat
> Pridie Kalendas Sextiles P. Memmio K. Fabio II coss.
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78948 From: petronius_dexter Date: 2010-07-31
Subject: Re: On Dictatorship
C. Petronius Pompeiae s.p.d.,

> I am sorry, and I implied no disrespect. I am more than aware of your knowledge of the ancient ways and of NR law. And I appreciate your recent position on these crutial issues.

Thank you very much.

Vale optime.

C. Petronius Dexter
Tribunus Plebis Arcoiali scribebat
Pridie Kalendas Sextiles P. Memmio K. Fabio II coss.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78949 From: petronius_dexter Date: 2010-07-31
Subject: Re: Gay marriage in NR
C. Petronius C. Catoni s.p.d.,

> If we already have the ancient ceremony of the actual Roman confarreatio, why does Piscinus need to "work" on it?

The problem is not about ancient ceremony but making new three publickly announced in conformity with the ancient.

First, here from Gaius Institutes the minimum requirements for performing confarreatio. I just find we have not.

"Farreo in manum conveniunt per quoddam genus sacrificii quod *Iovi Farreo* fit, in quo *farreus panis* adhibetur: unde etiam *confarreatio* dicitur; complura praeterea huius iuris ordinandi gratia *cum certis et sollemnibus verbis*, *praesentibus decem testibus*, aguntur et fiunt. Quod ius etiam nostris temporibus in usu est; nam flamines maiores, id est Diales, Martiales, Quirinales, item regem sacrorum, nisi ex farreatis nati non leguntur; ac ne ipsi quidem sine confarreatione sacerdotium habere possunt."

Second, this was the most archaic form of wedding and certainly the patrician form. So those 3 couples not being Patrician, I thought before performing confarreationes put them by law or adoption into patrician order.

Third, if I can accept due the NR internet circumstances that the Pontifex Maximus is represented within these weddings by a pontifex, I less agree that a sacerdos Iovis represents a Flamen Dialis when Nova Roma does not have any Flamen Dialis. A represententative of someone not yet existing in Nova Roma is difficult to me to be accepted.

Somethings like that do not have my agreement, but that is only my point of view. I am interested for Nova Roma to avoid "ira deorum", but now with the political mess this point of religio is trully a little detail... and I do not want, as another great civilization did,
Nova Roma dies out speaking about the angels sex.

Di immortales averruncent.

Optime vale.

C. Petronius Dexter
Arcoiali scribebat
Pridie Kalendas Sextiles P. Memmio K. Fabio II coss.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78950 From: Cato Date: 2010-07-31
Subject: Re: On Dictatorship
Cato Pompeio Minuciae Straboni sal.

Not at all. This is a healthy debate and one which, as I mentioned, I believe we *should* be having - but without an illegal Sword of Damocles hanging over our heads. I respect the concerns of those who utterly reject a dictatorship, even though I disagree with *some* of those concerns.

I only want to bring the context back to an ancient Roman form rather than assume that all dictatorships must by their nature be evil and unacceptable.

I'm thinking about what you have written and will respond when I put all my thoughts in coherent order :)

Vale,

Cato

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Susan" <metamorphosis2003@...> wrote:
>
> Pompeia Minucia Strabo C. Equito Catoni Quiritibus Novae Romae S.P.D.
>
> Senator Cato, I do not want you to think that I am attempting to provoke argument, certainly not. Your post on the theoretical aspects of Dictatorship is very informative. However, I'd like to expand on this statement, which you've expressed below. I feel compelled to:
>
> "What Nova Roma does NOT need is that a dictator be forced down our throats even
> - apparently - against the will of the person thought to be able to serve in
> that capacity; and most absolutely certainly not one that is having power thrust
> at him by a megalomaniacal creature intent only on expanding his influence and
> authority."
>
> Respondeo:
>
> I'm afraid I have difficulty envisioning our Dictator Hopeful as being somehow forced into this scenario. He voted for himself as Dictator, without a mention of concern regarding the illegality of these arrangements. He asked the Gods to help him, which I'm sure won the hearts of a few, but this does not make for proper procedure, or divine approval of inappropriate proceedings. I can actually see the Tribunes being confused on the law (why I've asked the Plebian Assembly on a few occasions to revisit the criteria for Tribune candidacy), but I cannot buy into these legal oversights by any magistrate who has climbed the complete cursus, and one who has in fact corrected me once or twice regarding the constitutional circumstances under which Tribunes may summon the Senate...it is certainly not global matters such as Dictatorship and Big Ticket Expenditures to the tune of 10K.
>
> PLEASE keep in mind that 50% of tax money is money belonging to the provincia. That said, the general treasury would be depleted with 10K spent, or nearly.
>
> Soooo, with respect,I am afraid I can't buy into the "honorable and the innocent" explanation for our Dictator Hopeful.
>
> I invite Marinus Dictator Hopeful to issue a public statement explaining his actions, particularly his sudden (cumulative?) loss of appreciation of Nova Roma law. or the macronational ramifications of current misbehaviours. He was recently quoted in this forum as saying (to Senators) that, (paraphrased) whatever the Tribunes regarded as constitutional, *was* constitutional, in complete contradiction to the excellent command of NR law he's displayed electronically in the past.
>
> To expand a bit on the otherwise theoretical, and well-appreciated points of Senator Cato, there was, as Cato discusses, *usually* a specific agenda for Dictator in Ancient Rome.... But certainly not always.
>
>
> In Nova Roma though, an *emergency* is realized, and that is the indication for consideration by the Senate for a Dictator. Said Dictator carries on for six months, as did Sulla of old, doing what he feels is necessary for NR, subject to ratification by the Senate.
>
> But...Oooooh and this is a BIG BUT....
>
> By the NR Constitution, the same Senators who gave the Dictator this power don't have to be the same Senators who approve his edicts. Theoretically, there is nothing to stop said Dictator from 'dismissing", "removing", "purging", whatever, ANY Senator (or citizen) who doesn't agree with his agenda, so when it comes time to ratify his edicts at the end of the six months, the Senate has radically changed in membership, populated only by those who will give approval to whatever he's mandated. There is the catch 22.
>
> Thank goodness the proceedings are illegal, because if honoured, they could prove to be very costly to Nova Roma, in more ways than one.
>
> Why do I care...I quit right? Well, I didn't quit caring, I just don't like to play in a muddy playground. Especially when (especially as a Senator) I could be held legally accountable for other peoples' malfeasance. And that's all I've seen since 2008. I was hoping NR would never be a game to the extent of this kind of con. I am truly hoping she can be salvaged, for the enjoyment of her citizens. *all* her citizens.
>
> valete omnes, and in good faith
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Cato" <catoinnyc@> wrote:
> >
> > C. Equitius Cato omnibus in foro SPD
> >
> > Quirites, I come before you to speak a small bit about dictatorship. Actual ancient Roman dictatorship, rather than the bogey-man of totalitarianism and suppression that we, as modern humans, have come to associate with the term.
> >
> > I mentioned before, in the Senate House and here in the Forum, that we are conditioned to assume that a dictatorship is, almost by common understanding, an inherently evil and destructive thing.
> >
> > In its 20th-century guises it certainly has been: Hitler, Stalin, Tito, Ceaucescu, Pol Pot, Castro, and the like have given us a modern concept of dictatorship that is absolutely abhorrent and incompatible (as Sulla has said) with the very foundations of liberty and democracy that we have come to cherish as the ultimate goals of human freedom across the globe, and to which we should never willingly submit.
> >
> > But is this how the ancients saw it? Did they recoil in horror at the mention of a dictator being chosen to perform one or another service to the Respublica? Was a Roman dictator the epitome of evil that we perceive dictatorship to be?
> >
> > The short answer is "not necessarily" :)
> >
> > While Livy does speak of the unease with which a dictator might appear before the People (he was allowed to have the fasces complete with axes borne before him in the City, unlike any other magistrate), and it is repeated often that the dictator could hold office for a maximum of six months - in other words, it was an aberration from normative government - it was seen as a necessary component of government at times. For all that it meant giving up certain liberties (the right of appealing from his decisions is most often mentioned), there were times when a single plenipotentiary voice was seen as necessary. In fact, the Senate actually *forced* the consuls to name a dictator at least once (admittedly at a time when the consuls were fighting very badly amongst themselves and kept losing their battles against the rebelling Volscians to boot).
> >
> > But Smith's Dictionary also says this:
> >
> > "...but dictators were also frequently appointed, especially when the consuls were absent from the city, to perform certain acts, which could not be done by any inferior magistrate. These dictators had little more than the name; and as they were only appointed to discharge a particular duty, they had to resign immediately that duty was performed, and they were not entitled to exercise the power of their office in reference to any other matter than the one for which they were nominated. The occasions on which such dictators were appointed, were principally:— 1. For the purpose of holding the comitia for the elections (comitiorum habendorum causa). 2. For fixing the clavus annalis in the temple of Jupiter (clavi figendi causa) in times of pestilence or civil discord, because the law said that this ceremony was to be performed by the praetor maximus, and after the institution of the dictatorship the latter was regarded as the highest magistracy in the state (Liv. VII.3). 3. For appointing holidays (feriarum constituendarum causa) on the appearance of prodigies (Liv. VII.28), and for officiating at the public games (ludorum faciendorum causa), the presidency of which belonged to the consuls or praetors (VIII.40, IX.34). 4. For holding trials (quaestionibus exercendis, IX.36). 5. And on one occasion, for filling up vacancies in the senate (legendo senatui, XXIII.22)."
> >
> > So it was not only at the sound of barbarians whacking at the gates of the City that dictators were appointed, but also to simply carry out jobs that were of immediate and simple urgency.
> >
> > In every case, however, a dictator could *only* be appointed after the Senate had met and confirmed to the consuls that they had the right to do so. As Smith's says:
> >
> > "When a dictator was considered necessary, the senate passed a senatus consultum that one of the consuls should nominate (dicere) a dictator; and without a previous decree of the senate the consuls had not the power of naming a dictator...In almost all cases we find mention of a previous decree of the senate (see e.g. [Livy] II.30, IV.17, 21, 23, 26, 57, VI.2, VII.21, VIII.17, IX.29, X.11, XXII.57); and in a few instances, in which the appointment by the consul is alone spoken of, the senatus consultum is probably not mentioned, simply because it was a matter of course."
> >
> > So this is my understanding: there were times when it was seen as necessary to give a jump-start to getting things done, and not only in time of war. The Romans turned in an orderly way, reliant upon the processes of law and the authority of the civil magistrates and the Senate, to men who had served the State (you had to have been a consul to be appointed as dictator) and trusted them, for a short period of time, to get the job or jobs done.
> >
> > Whether or not Nova Roma needs that jump-start is truly at the heart of the debate, and it is a debate worthy of having no matter how you feel about the issue.
> >
> > What Nova Roma does NOT need is that a dictator be forced down our throats even - apparently - against the will of the person thought to be able to serve in that capacity; and most absolutely certainly not one that is having power thrust at him by a megalomaniacal creature intent only on expanding his influence and authority.
> >
> > Valete,
> >
> > Cato
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78951 From: Gaius Tullius Valerianus Date: 2010-07-31
Subject: Re: Official Name Change
Salve Aeternia,

Congratulations on the name change! And you're a "Cornelia Valeriana" now -
I'm no longer the only Nova Roman with a "Valerianus/a" name! I like it!

Vale,
~ Valerianus


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78952 From: Riku Demyx Date: 2010-07-31
Subject: Re: Gay marriage in NR
Salve,
Not to stir up that argument again but if they got to be patrician just for
marrying I would be totally bugged.
DTIC
Nero



________________________________
From: petronius_dexter <jfarnoud94@...>
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Sat, July 31, 2010 1:45:58 AM
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Gay marriage in NR


C. Petronius C. Catoni s.p.d.,

> If we already have the ancient ceremony of the actual Roman confarreatio, why
>does Piscinus need to "work" on it?
>

The problem is not about ancient ceremony but making new three publickly
announced in conformity with the ancient.

First, here from Gaius Institutes the minimum requirements for performing
confarreatio. I just find we have not.

"Farreo in manum conveniunt per quoddam genus sacrificii quod *Iovi Farreo* fit,
in quo *farreus panis* adhibetur: unde etiam *confarreatio* dicitur; complura
praeterea huius iuris ordinandi gratia *cum certis et sollemnibus verbis*,
*praesentibus decem testibus*, aguntur et fiunt. Quod ius etiam nostris
temporibus in usu est; nam flamines maiores, id est Diales, Martiales,
Quirinales, item regem sacrorum, nisi ex farreatis nati non leguntur; ac ne ipsi
quidem sine confarreatione sacerdotium habere possunt."

Second, this was the most archaic form of wedding and certainly the patrician
form. So those 3 couples not being Patrician, I thought before performing
confarreationes put them by law or adoption into patrician order.

Third, if I can accept due the NR internet circumstances that the Pontifex
Maximus is represented within these weddings by a pontifex, I less agree that a
sacerdos Iovis represents a Flamen Dialis when Nova Roma does not have any
Flamen Dialis. A represententative of someone not yet existing in Nova Roma is
difficult to me to be accepted.

Somethings like that do not have my agreement, but that is only my point of
view. I am interested for Nova Roma to avoid "ira deorum", but now with the
political mess this point of religio is trully a little detail... and I do not
want, as another great civilization did,
Nova Roma dies out speaking about the angels sex.

Di immortales averruncent.

Optime vale.

C. Petronius Dexter
Arcoiali scribebat
Pridie Kalendas Sextiles P. Memmio K. Fabio II coss.







[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 78953 From: petronius_dexter Date: 2010-07-31
Subject: Re: Gay marriage in NR
Ave,

> Not to stir up that argument again but if they got to be patrician just for marrying I would be totally bugged.

But confarreationes are not the one way to be married.

In NR we seems to chose as marriage ceremony one of the most archaic with coemptio, which was patrician, when other ways of marriage was more modern in ancient Rome too, for example weddings sine manu. Making confarreatio as NR wedding, that is the same making the wedding of Prince Charles and Lady Diana representative of the common XXth century marriages.

I think current marriages as ceremony with shared love, foreign priest other than Paterfamilias, and with christian, biblical and other practices has nothing to do with ancient Roman marriages.

So, because in our times with our modern attitudes within marriage love is more important than ancient motives, I just think instead of parodying ancient confarreationes with powder of a christian ceremony, to create NR true wedding ceremonies in accordance with Juno, Venus and Eros.

Vale optime.

C. Petronius Dexter
Arcoiali scribebat
Pridie Kalendas Sextiles P. Memmio K. Fabio II coss.