Selected messages in Nova-Roma group. Aug 14-22, 2010

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79347 From: Cato Date: 2010-08-14
Subject: Re: Farewell, Nova Roma
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79348 From: Kirsteen Wright Date: 2010-08-14
Subject: Re: To all Cultores Deorum and to the Forum
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79349 From: Diana Octavia Date: 2010-08-14
Subject: Re: Office of Dictator illegal under Maine law
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79350 From: iulius sabinus Date: 2010-08-14
Subject: Re: To all Cultores Deorum and to the Forum
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79351 From: Susan Date: 2010-08-14
Subject: Re: To all Cultores Deorum and to the Forum
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79352 From: Publius Ullerius Stephanus Venator Date: 2010-08-14
Subject: Re: To all Cultores Deorum and to the Forum
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79353 From: rory12001 Date: 2010-08-14
Subject: new list Conventus Matronarum
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79354 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2010-08-14
Subject: Re: new list Conventus Matronarum
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79355 From: luciaiuliaaquila Date: 2010-08-14
Subject: Re: To all Cultores Deorum and to the Forum
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79356 From: rory12001 Date: 2010-08-14
Subject: Re: new list Conventus Matronarum
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79357 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2010-08-14
Subject: Re: new list Conventus Matronarum
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79358 From: Gaius Vipsanius Agrippa Date: 2010-08-14
Subject: Re: Farewell, Nova Roma
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79359 From: Belle Morte Statia Date: 2010-08-14
Subject: Re: new list Conventus Matronarum
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79360 From: Marcus Prometheus Date: 2010-08-14
Subject: +Re: HAPPY 60TH BIRTHDAY QUINTILAINUS !
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79361 From: Gaius Tullius Valerianus Date: 2010-08-14
Subject: Re: new list Conventus Matronarum
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79362 From: Susan Date: 2010-08-14
Subject: Re: To all Cultores Deorum and to the Forum
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79363 From: C.Maria Caeca Date: 2010-08-14
Subject: clarification and apology
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79364 From: eagled2 Date: 2010-08-14
Subject: Re: New Site Design
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79365 From: rory12001 Date: 2010-08-14
Subject: Re: new list Conventus Matronarum
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79366 From: Timothy or Stephen Gallagher Date: 2010-08-14
Subject: From the archives of SG-1
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79367 From: Gaius Tullius Valerianus Date: 2010-08-14
Subject: Re: new list Conventus Matronarum
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79368 From: luciaiuliaaquila Date: 2010-08-14
Subject: Re: To all Cultores Deorum and to the Forum
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79369 From: luciaiuliaaquila Date: 2010-08-14
Subject: Re: clarification and apology
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79370 From: C.Maria Caeca Date: 2010-08-14
Subject: Re: clarification and apology
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79372 From: Nero Date: 2010-08-15
Subject: Mask(s) of the Manes
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79373 From: Kirsteen Wright Date: 2010-08-15
Subject: Re: clarification and apology
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79374 From: marcushoratius Date: 2010-08-15
Subject: a. d. XVIII Kalendas Septembras: Romulus and the Curiones
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79375 From: Cato Date: 2010-08-15
Subject: Re: a. d. XVIII Kalendas Septembras: Romulus and the Curiones
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79376 From: C.Maria Caeca Date: 2010-08-15
Subject: A little something ...
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79377 From: Publius Ullerius Stephanus Venator Date: 2010-08-15
Subject: Re: A little something ...
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79378 From: C.Maria Caeca Date: 2010-08-15
Subject: Re: A little something ...
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79379 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2010-08-15
Subject: Latin classes: last call for Grammatica Latina
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79380 From: aerdensrw Date: 2010-08-15
Subject: Re: Farewell, Nova Roma
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79381 From: James Hooper Date: 2010-08-15
Subject: Re: Latin classes: last call for Grammatica Latina
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79382 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2010-08-15
Subject: Avitus' protreptic to Nova Roma
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79383 From: Vedius Date: 2010-08-15
Subject: Re: Avitus' protreptic to Nova Roma
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79384 From: rory12001 Date: 2010-08-15
Subject: Re: Avitus' protreptic to Nova Roma
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79385 From: Vedius Date: 2010-08-15
Subject: Re: Avitus' protreptic to Nova Roma
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79386 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2010-08-15
Subject: Re: Avitus' protreptic to Nova Roma
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79387 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2010-08-15
Subject: Re: Avitus' protreptic to Nova Roma
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79388 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2010-08-15
Subject: Re: Latin classes: last call for Grammatica Latina
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79389 From: rory12001 Date: 2010-08-15
Subject: Re: Avitus' protreptic to Nova Roma
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79390 From: gualterus_graecus Date: 2010-08-16
Subject: Re: Avitus' protreptic to Nova Roma
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79391 From: Gaia Valeria Pulchra Date: 2010-08-16
Subject: Sodalitas Familiarum
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79392 From: mcorvvs Date: 2010-08-16
Subject: Re: Ides ritual performed by Sacerdos Iovis M.Octavius Corvus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79393 From: mcorvvs Date: 2010-08-16
Subject: FIRST NOVAROMAN MUNICIPIUM - MUNICIPIUM POLTAVA (SARMATIA) - APPROVE
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79394 From: mcorvvs Date: 2010-08-16
Subject: FERIAE PROV. SARMATIAE NOVAE ROMANAE II
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79395 From: Cato Date: 2010-08-16
Subject: a.d. XVII Kal. Sept.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79396 From: marcushoratius Date: 2010-08-16
Subject: a. d. XVII Kalendas Septembras: Papirius and the Pullarius
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79397 From: Publius Memmius Albucius Date: 2010-08-16
Subject: Senate/Board - intent to convene it
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79398 From: Cato Date: 2010-08-16
Subject: Correction of Calendrical Formula
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79399 From: M·CVR·COMPLVTENSIS Date: 2010-08-16
Subject: Re: Correction of Calendrical Formula
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79400 From: James Hooper Date: 2010-08-16
Subject: Re: Latin classes: last call for Grammatica Latina
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79401 From: rory12001 Date: 2010-08-16
Subject: Re: Correction of Calendrical Formula
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79402 From: rory12001 Date: 2010-08-16
Subject: Re: Avitus' protreptic to Nova Roma
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79403 From: petronius_dexter Date: 2010-08-16
Subject: Re: a. d. XVIII Kalendas Septembras: Romulus and the Curiones
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79404 From: Cato Date: 2010-08-16
Subject: Re: a. d. XVIII Kalendas Septembras: Romulus and the Curiones
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79405 From: petronius_dexter Date: 2010-08-16
Subject: Re: a. d. XVIII Kalendas Septembras: Romulus and the Curiones
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79406 From: fauxrari Date: 2010-08-16
Subject: Wedding photos! At last!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79407 From: aerdensrw Date: 2010-08-16
Subject: Re: Latin classes: last call for Grammatica Latina
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79408 From: C.Maria Caeca Date: 2010-08-16
Subject: Re: Latin classes: last call for Grammatica Latina
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79409 From: luciaiuliaaquila Date: 2010-08-16
Subject: Re: Wedding photos! At last!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79410 From: luciaiuliaaquila Date: 2010-08-16
Subject: Re: FERIAE PROV. SARMATIAE NOVAE ROMANAE II
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79411 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2010-08-16
Subject: Re: Latin classes: last call for Grammatica Latina
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79412 From: mcorvvs Date: 2010-08-17
Subject: Re: FERIAE PROV. SARMATIAE NOVAE ROMANAE II
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79413 From: Cato Date: 2010-08-17
Subject: a.d. XVI Kal. Sept.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79414 From: marcushoratius Date: 2010-08-17
Subject: a. d. XVI Kalendas Septembras: PORTUNALIA
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79415 From: James Hooper Date: 2010-08-17
Subject: Re: Latin classes: last call for Grammatica Latina
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79416 From: Gaius Petronius Dexter Date: 2010-08-17
Subject: Today: PORTVNALIA [MMDCCLXIII auc]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79417 From: luciaiuliaaquila Date: 2010-08-17
Subject: Re: FERIAE PROV. SARMATIAE NOVAE ROMANAE II
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79418 From: luciaiuliaaquila Date: 2010-08-17
Subject: Re: Today: PORTVNALIA [MMDCCLXIII auc]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79419 From: rory12001 Date: 2010-08-17
Subject: Re: FERIAE PROV. SARMATIAE NOVAE ROMANAE II
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79420 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2010-08-17
Subject: The ideology of the feminine in Byzantine historical narrative: The
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79421 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2010-08-17
Subject: Culture of controversy: The Christological disputes of the early fif
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79422 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2010-08-17
Subject: Magic and religious authority in Philostratus' "Life of Apollonius o
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79423 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2010-08-17
Subject: THE CULTURAL BASES OF MONTANISM
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79424 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2010-08-17
Subject: Visualizing medieval otherworlds in Greco-Byzantine romances
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79425 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2010-08-17
Subject: "Pluralism" and "universalism" in the world of Libanios
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79426 From: aerdensrw Date: 2010-08-17
Subject: Re: Avitus' protreptic to Nova Roma
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79427 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2010-08-17
Subject: Patterns of patronage: The politics and ideology of public building
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79428 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2010-08-17
Subject: Towards Roman Edessa: 114-242 C.E
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79429 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2010-08-17
Subject: Seeds of imperialism: A core/periphery study in the Eastern Roman Em
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79430 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2010-08-18
Subject: Hermes Arabicus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79431 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2010-08-18
Subject: CELSUS AND LATE SECOND-CENTURY CHRISTIANITY
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79432 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2010-08-18
Subject: Re: Latin classes: last call for Grammatica Latina
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79433 From: rory12001 Date: 2010-08-18
Subject: a Praetorial Warning & unfairness
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79434 From: gualterus_graecus Date: 2010-08-18
Subject: Re: a Praetorial Warning & unfairness
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79435 From: marcushoratius Date: 2010-08-18
Subject: a. d. XV Kalendas Septembris: Venus of Eryx and Rome
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79436 From: marcushoratius Date: 2010-08-18
Subject: Re: a Praetorial Warning & unfairness
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79437 From: Leah Bernardo-Ciddio Date: 2010-08-18
Subject: Re: Patterns of patronage: The politics and ideology of public build
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79438 From: Cato Date: 2010-08-18
Subject: Re: a Praetorial Warning & unfairness
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79439 From: gualterus_graecus Date: 2010-08-18
Subject: Re: a Praetorial Warning & unfairness
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79440 From: M. Octavius Gracchus Date: 2010-08-18
Subject: Re: a Praetorial Warning & unfairness
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79441 From: Publius Memmius Albucius Date: 2010-08-18
Subject: Appointment of two praetors
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79442 From: James Hooper Date: 2010-08-18
Subject: Re: Latin classes: last call for Grammatica Latina
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79443 From: James Hooper Date: 2010-08-18
Subject: Re: a Praetorial Warning & unfairness
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79444 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2010-08-18
Subject: Re: a Praetorial Warning & unfairness
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79445 From: James Hooper Date: 2010-08-18
Subject: Re: a Praetorial Warning & unfairness
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79446 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2010-08-18
Subject: Re: a Praetorial Warning & unfairness
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79447 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2010-08-18
Subject: Re: a Praetorial Warning & unfairness
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79448 From: Christer Edling Date: 2010-08-18
Subject: Edictum Consulare CFBQ XXIII on veto of the Edict on Appointment of
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79449 From: M. Octavius Gracchus Date: 2010-08-18
Subject: Re: Edictum Consulare CFBQ XXIII on veto of the Edict on Appointment
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79450 From: Publius Memmius Albucius Date: 2010-08-18
Subject: Record and respect of the cos minor's veto of my appointment of two
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79451 From: rory12001 Date: 2010-08-18
Subject: Re: Edictum Consulare CFBQ XXIII on veto of the Edict on Appointment
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79452 From: Publius Memmius Albucius Date: 2010-08-18
Subject: Request for auspices (next Senate session)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79453 From: Kirsteen Wright Date: 2010-08-18
Subject: Re: Edictum Consulare CFBQ XXIII on veto of the Edict on Appointment
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79454 From: rory12001 Date: 2010-08-18
Subject: Re: Edictum Consulare CFBQ XXIII on veto of the Edict on Appointment
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79455 From: James Hooper Date: 2010-08-18
Subject: Re: a Praetorial Warning & unfairness
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79456 From: M. Octavius Gracchus Date: 2010-08-18
Subject: Re: Edictum Consulare CFBQ XXIII on veto of the Edict on Appointment
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79457 From: rory12001 Date: 2010-08-18
Subject: Re: Edictum Consulare CFBQ XXIII on veto of the Edict on Appointment
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79458 From: Cato Date: 2010-08-19
Subject: Forwarding Irrelevent Postings from Unofficial Lists
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79459 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2010-08-19
Subject: Re: Forwarding Irrelevent Postings from Unofficial Lists
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79460 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2010-08-19
Subject: Women in Nova Roma
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79461 From: petronius_dexter Date: 2010-08-19
Subject: Re: Request for auspices (next Senate session)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79462 From: rory12001 Date: 2010-08-19
Subject: Re: Request for auspices (next Senate session)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79463 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2010-08-19
Subject: Re: Request for auspices (next Senate session)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79464 From: petronius_dexter Date: 2010-08-19
Subject: Re: Request for auspices (next Senate session)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79465 From: Cato Date: 2010-08-19
Subject: Re: Request for auspices (next Senate session)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79466 From: enodia2002 Date: 2010-08-19
Subject: Re: a Praetorial Warning & unfairness
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79467 From: rory12001 Date: 2010-08-19
Subject: Re: a Praetorial Warning & unfairness
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79468 From: Kirsteen Wright Date: 2010-08-19
Subject: Re: Edictum Consulare CFBQ XXIII on veto of the Edict on Appointment
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79469 From: marcushoratius Date: 2010-08-19
Subject: a. d. XIV Kalendas Septembris: VINALIA RUSTICA
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79470 From: Publius Memmius Albucius Date: 2010-08-19
Subject: Re: Request for auspices (next Senate session)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79471 From: publiusalbucius Date: 2010-08-19
Subject: Subscription in this Forum - censors and others
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79472 From: Cato Date: 2010-08-19
Subject: Re: Subscription in this Forum - censors and others
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79473 From: Publius Memmius Albucius Date: 2010-08-19
Subject: Measure of moderation
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79474 From: David Kling Date: 2010-08-19
Subject: Re: Measure of moderation
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79475 From: publiusalbucius Date: 2010-08-19
Subject: Re: Measure of moderation
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79476 From: C.Maria Caeca Date: 2010-08-19
Subject: Re: Women in Nova Roma
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79477 From: Gaius Petronius Dexter Date: 2010-08-20
Subject: Tribunician report for July/August session of the Senate.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79478 From: mcorvvs Date: 2010-08-20
Subject: Re: FERIAE PROV. SARMATIAE NOVAE ROMANAE II
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79479 From: marcushoratius Date: 2010-08-20
Subject: a. d. XIII Kalendas Septembris: On Thunder, Kisses, and Knees
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79480 From: Gaius Petronius Dexter Date: 2010-08-20
Subject: Re: Tribunician report for July/August session of the Senate.[Correc
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79481 From: mcorvvs Date: 2010-08-21
Subject: Intercessio
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79482 From: Gaius Tullius Valerianus Date: 2010-08-21
Subject: Re: Intercessio
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79483 From: Cato Date: 2010-08-21
Subject: Re: Intercessio
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79484 From: Gaius Petronius Dexter Date: 2010-08-21
Subject: And the farce continues...
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79485 From: rory12001 Date: 2010-08-21
Subject: Re: Intercessio
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79486 From: petronius_dexter Date: 2010-08-21
Subject: Re: farce
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79487 From: Gaius Petronius Dexter Date: 2010-08-21
Subject: The farce continues.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79488 From: Gaius Petronius Dexter Date: 2010-08-21
Subject: The big farce.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79489 From: Gaius Petronius Dexter Date: 2010-08-21
Subject: Re: Counter Intercessio by C. Petronius Dexter.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79490 From: Riku Demyx Date: 2010-08-21
Subject: Re: Intercessio
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79491 From: QFabiusMaxmi@aol.com Date: 2010-08-21
Subject: Re: Intercessio
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79492 From: Publius Memmius Albucius Date: 2010-08-21
Subject: Re: [CPT] Intercessio
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79493 From: marcushoratius Date: 2010-08-21
Subject: a. d. XII Kalendas Septembris: CONSUALIA
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79494 From: marcushoratius Date: 2010-08-21
Subject: Report of the August session of the Collegium Pontificum
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79495 From: Diana Octavia Date: 2010-08-21
Subject: Re: Women in Nova Roma
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79496 From: James Hooper Date: 2010-08-21
Subject: Re: Women in Nova Roma
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79497 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2010-08-21
Subject: Re: Women in Nova Roma
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79498 From: C.Maria Caeca Date: 2010-08-21
Subject: something I wrote
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79499 From: Cato Date: 2010-08-21
Subject: Re: Report of the August session of the Collegium Pontificum
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79500 From: Cato Date: 2010-08-21
Subject: Re: Report of the August session of the Collegium Pontificum
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79501 From: Kirsteen Wright Date: 2010-08-21
Subject: Re: something I wrote
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79502 From: Cato Date: 2010-08-21
Subject: Re: Report of the August session of the Collegium Pontificum
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79503 From: petronius_dexter Date: 2010-08-22
Subject: Re: something I wrote
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79504 From: rory12001 Date: 2010-08-22
Subject: Re: Women in Nova Roma
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79505 From: rory12001 Date: 2010-08-22
Subject: Re: Report of the August session of the Collegium Pontificum
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79506 From: Cato Date: 2010-08-22
Subject: Re: Report of the August session of the Collegium Pontificum
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79507 From: petronius_dexter Date: 2010-08-22
Subject: Re: Women in Nova Roma
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79508 From: Cato Date: 2010-08-22
Subject: Re: Women in Nova Roma
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79509 From: Cato Date: 2010-08-22
Subject: lex de legibus discendis
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79510 From: petronius_dexter Date: 2010-08-22
Subject: Re: Women in Nova Roma
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79511 From: GAIUS MARCIUS CRISPUS Date: 2010-08-22
Subject: Re: lex de legibus discendis
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79512 From: petronius_dexter Date: 2010-08-22
Subject: Re: lex de legibus discendis
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79513 From: Cato Date: 2010-08-22
Subject: Re: lex de legibus discendis
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79514 From: marcushoratius Date: 2010-08-22
Subject: Re: And the farce continues...
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79515 From: marcushoratius Date: 2010-08-22
Subject: Re: Report of the August session of the Collegium Pontificum
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79516 From: marcushoratius Date: 2010-08-22
Subject: Re: Report of the August session of the Collegium Pontificum
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79517 From: GAIUS MARCIUS CRISPUS Date: 2010-08-22
Subject: Re: lex de legibus discendis
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79518 From: petronius_dexter Date: 2010-08-22
Subject: Re: And the farce continues...
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79519 From: marcushoratius Date: 2010-08-22
Subject: Re: lex de legibus discendis
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79520 From: petronius_dexter Date: 2010-08-22
Subject: Re: And the farce continues...
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79521 From: petronius_dexter Date: 2010-08-22
Subject: Re: lex de legibus discendis
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79522 From: marcushoratius Date: 2010-08-22
Subject: Re: And the farce continues...
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79523 From: marcushoratius Date: 2010-08-22
Subject: Re: And the farce continues...



Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79347 From: Cato Date: 2010-08-14
Subject: Re: Farewell, Nova Roma
Cato Liviae sal.

Alanis Morissette, I think it was! It was pretty awesome :)

Vale,

Cato

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "L. Livia Plauta" <livia.plauta@...> wrote:
>
> Salve Sulla,
> Maior's posts don't remind me of it, but here you mention one my favourite
> films. It's certainly one of the most hilarious films in the history of
> cinema. I specially like the end, when it turns our God is a woman.
>
> Vale,
> Livia
>
> > Ave,
> >
> > I understand what you are saying, but to relate it to the situation along
> > this thread, when Maior posts, for some reason I am reminded of the movie
> > Dogma. A very good Kevin Smith movie where they are constantly saying how
> > blind belief in Dogma is what is allowing the two Angels (Ben Affleck and
> > Matt Damon) for the end of the Earth. If you haven't seen this movie
> > Affleck and Damon are two angels and they are trying to get back to Heaven
> > and they found a loophole in Catholic Dogma (hence the name of the movie)
> > and it follows their attempt to get back to Heaven regardless of the
> > consequences and the other characters of the movie (Selma Hayeck, Chris
> > Rock, Fiorentino, and Alan Rickman play the other side who are trying to
> > prevent Affleck and Damon from finding a loophole in Catholic Dogma and
> > thus
> > bring about the end of the world. And the Linda Fieorintino (sp), along
> > with
> > Chris Rock keep trying to find a way for Linda to find her faith back in
> > the
> > Catholic Church and he keeps asking her if she believes and ultimately she
> > comes to the realization that she does not believe but has a good idea.
> > Maior BELIEVES. nothing more and nothing less. Facts, even one's in the
> > very text - do not alter her belief. Yes, taken to extreme you can either
> > have a psycopath and on the other spectrum, one I believe Maior tends to
> > fall into a single minded fanatic (but not charismatic).
> >
> > Vale,
> >
> > Sulla
> >
> > On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 9:43 PM, C.Maria Caeca
> > <c.mariacaeca@...>wrote:
> >
> >>
> >>
> >> Maria Caeca Sullae sal,
> >>
> >> um ...that ...is a non-question, containing as id does, your own opinion.
> >> However ...since you asked ...either in and of itself, or alone, is
> >> unbalanced. I have never thought that intellect and emotion are mutually
> >> exclusive, or should act in absolute opposition, creating an either/or
> >> situation. My view is that one needs both ...and one also needs to know
> >> when
> >> which is appropriate. Intellect without emotion can produce a brilliant
> >> psychopath: emotion without intellect can produce something equally
> >> dangerous ...a charismatic single minded fanatic. both are equally
> >> lethal,
> >> for different reasons.
> >>
> >> Well, you *did* ask, yes?
> >>
> >> Respectfully,
> >> Maria Caeca
> >>
> >>
> >> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------------
> >
> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79348 From: Kirsteen Wright Date: 2010-08-14
Subject: Re: To all Cultores Deorum and to the Forum
On Sat, Aug 14, 2010 at 5:14 PM, luciaiuliaaquila <
luciaiuliaaquila@...> wrote:

> L. Iulia Aquila Amicae et Amici, Quirites, Socii, Peregrinisque S.P.D.
>
> I will not address right now the issue of Nova Roma without Vestals or the
> certain perils of allowing an untrained Camilla to assume such sacred duties
> of the sacra publica, because it is not a simple action to simply "replace"
> a Vestal much less our Chief Vestal.
>

No one is going to suggest for a minute that it is a simple matter. It
remains, however, that we have lost our Virgo Maxima and I continue to offer
my prayers to Vesta for her health and the health of her mother. In such
trying circumstances I think we are extremely fortunate that we have someone
in training, someone who is willing to serve Vesta and I think we should all
offer our prayers for her in what she will undoubtedly find a difficult
time.

May Vesta bless her and keep her.

By the way the photos are absolutely stunnung - a real joy to behold.

Thank you

Flavia Lucilla Merula


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79349 From: Diana Octavia Date: 2010-08-14
Subject: Re: Office of Dictator illegal under Maine law
Salve Marinus,

I haven't been really following this thread very much. But I have to say
that that although we've had our differences in the past, I can clearly see
now that you are an honest man and want only the best for Nova Roma.

So I hope that you will accept my humblest apologies for giving you grief in
the past.

Vale,
Diana Octavia

----- Original Message -----
From: "Gnaeus Equitius Marinus" <gawne@...>
To: <NRComitiaCuriata@yahoogroups.com>; <nova-roma@yahoogroups.com>;
<novaroma-announce@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Thursday, August 12, 2010 7:49 AM
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Office of Dictator illegal under Maine law


> Salvete Quirites,
>
> I have been informed by the Maine lawyer, Mr. Harvey Mechanic, who I
> retained at my own cost, that the office of Dictator as defined in
> Nova Roma's constitution is illegal under Maine law.
>
> Mr. Mechanic writes:
>
> --- Begin Citation ---
>
> The State law allows one person to hold all offices of a nonprofit
> corporation
> http://law.justia.com/maine/codes/title13-bch0sec0/title13-bsec710.html
> but not "full legislative powers" which are what the Board has and may
> not delegate to a one man committee (Dictator). Therefore, the
> Dictator position is illegal under Maine law.
>
> --- End Citation ---
>
> So, I will NOT assume the office of Dictator. Furthermore, I strongly
> recommend the Senate take immediate steps in its capacity as Board of
> Directors to review any laws enacted under the previous dictatorship
> and to act as necessary to bring us into compliance with Maine law.
>
> Valete,
>
> CN-EQVIT-MARINVS
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79350 From: iulius sabinus Date: 2010-08-14
Subject: Re: To all Cultores Deorum and to the Forum
SALVETE!
 
Wonderful event and photos. Great congratulations to organizers and participants.
All of you are beautiful!
 
VALETE,
Sabinus

"Every individual is the architect of his own fortune" - Appius Claudius

--- On Sat, 8/14/10, luciaiuliaaquila <luciaiuliaaquila@...> wrote:


From: luciaiuliaaquila <luciaiuliaaquila@...>
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: To all Cultores Deorum and to the Forum
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Date: Saturday, August 14, 2010, 7:14 PM


 



L. Iulia Aquila Amicae et Amici, Quirites, Socii, Peregrinisque S.P.D.


What is now available are magnificent photos of the expression of love and the commitments of six cultores from "FERIAE PROV. SARMATIAE II":
http://picasaweb.google.com/m.octavius.corvus/FERIAEPROVSARMATIAEII?feat=content_notification#5504776046459740530

If you cannot access this link input "FERIAE PROV. SARMATIAE II" in your search engine.

Again I congratulate all the couples and may Mater Venus guide you, protect you and bless you with strong healthy offspring. May Venus bless your homes so that they are filled with love and strength to endure and enjoy all that life lays at your feet.

To all Novi Romani, without exceptions, May the Mother of ALL Romans, Mater Venus, protect, guide and bless us ALL and intercede with the Gods of Rome on our behalf.

Valete optime in pacem deorum et in pace Veneris!

Julia
Sacerdos Veneris Genetricis
Securum in tenebris me facit esse Venus





[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79351 From: Susan Date: 2010-08-14
Subject: Re: To all Cultores Deorum and to the Forum
Pompeia;Iuliae quiritibusque Novae Romae sal.

I must confess to a bit of confusion here Iulia, with all due respect. Perhaps my understanding of the Religio is not what it should be:

On one hand you speak of the perils of an untrained camilla assuming certain sacred duties of the sacra publica (which you don't wish to address further right now, I take it)

Then on the other hand you state that we (citizens) are *all* responsible if the "Gods of Roma abandon Nova Roma", thereby placing upon each citizen at least some responsibility of sacred duties to the sacra publica (an integral part, if not synonymous with the Pax Deorum) Most of us are in essence 'untrained camillae'.

Here's my question: Should the cultores refrain from prayer and ritual, because it is a hazard to do so, due to their lack of formal religious training and licensure, *or* should they do so ad lib, given their responsibility to avoid divine abandonment, a responsibility you enumerated above?

I am hearing two messages, which seem quite contradictory. Would you care to clarify? I am interested, but a clarification might be especially enlightening to those privately *and* publicly devoted to the cultus deorum.

Thank in advance


--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "luciaiuliaaquila" <luciaiuliaaquila@...> wrote:
>
> L. Iulia Aquila Amicae et Amici, Quirites, Socii, Peregrinisque S.P.D.
>
> I will not address right now the issue of Nova Roma without Vestals or the certain perils of allowing an untrained Camilla to assume such sacred duties of the sacra publica, because it is not a simple action to simply "replace" a Vestal much less our Chief Vestal.
> We all, collectively, are responsible if the the Gods of Rome desert Nova Roma.
> All of us find it easy to lay blame but few are strong enough to truly shoulder it themselves. This does not come from our words solely but from the actions that support and give credence to our words.
>
> Maxima Valeria Messallina shall always be a Vestal held warmly in the heart of Vesta. She will continue to maintain the Flame of Vesta in her domus. This has not changed.
>
> What is now available are magnificent photos of the expression of love and the commitments of six cultores from "FERIAE PROV. SARMATIAE II":
> http://picasaweb.google.com/m.octavius.corvus/FERIAEPROVSARMATIAEII?feat=content_notification#5504776046459740530
>
> If you cannot access this link input "FERIAE PROV. SARMATIAE II" in your search engine.
>
> Again I congratulate all the couples and may Mater Venus guide you, protect you and bless you with strong healthy offspring. May Venus bless your homes so that they are filled with love and strength to endure and enjoy all that life lays at your feet.
>
> To all Novi Romani, without exceptions, May the Mother of ALL Romans, Mater Venus, protect, guide and bless us ALL and intercede with the Gods of Rome on our behalf.
>
> Valete optime in pacem deorum et in pace Veneris!
>
> Julia
> Sacerdos Veneris Genetricis
> Securum in tenebris me facit esse Venus
>
>
> Everywhere man blames nature and fate, yet his fate is mostly but the echo of his character and passions, his mistakes and weaknesses (Democritus)
> Remember how often you have postponed minding your interest, and let slip those opportunities the gods have given you. It is now high time to consider what sort of world you are part of, and from what kind of governor of it you are descended; that you have a set period assigned you to act in, and unless you improve it to brighten and compose your thoughts, it will quickly run off with you, and be lost beyond recovery.(Marcus Aurelius)
> First take the plank out of your eye, and then you will see clearly to remove the speck from your brother's eye.(Luke)
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79352 From: Publius Ullerius Stephanus Venator Date: 2010-08-14
Subject: Re: To all Cultores Deorum and to the Forum
Salve L Iulia;

Gratias tibi ago for the link to the photos. The sight of them
brought a little mist to the eyes of this aging, sometimes grumbly,
bearcat of a poet.

It was good to see so many young folk, with such obvious joy of the day!

Vale - Venator
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79353 From: rory12001 Date: 2010-08-14
Subject: new list Conventus Matronarum
Salvete;
I've started a new list Conventus Matronarum for women who are interested in Roman history, religio, culture, Latin,

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/conventus_matronarum/

it's a place for friendship, good discussions & none of crap that exists on the ML

all matrones are cordially invited to join the list;

M. Hortensia Maior
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79354 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2010-08-14
Subject: Re: new list Conventus Matronarum
Maior you might want to change that picture there in case kids see it....it
is potentially pornographic.

Vale,

Sulla

On Sat, Aug 14, 2010 at 12:24 PM, rory12001 <rory12001@...> wrote:

>
>
> Salvete;
> I've started a new list Conventus Matronarum for women who are interested
> in Roman history, religio, culture, Latin,
>
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/conventus_matronarum/
>
> it's a place for friendship, good discussions & none of crap that exists on
> the ML
>
> all matrones are cordially invited to join the list;
>
> M. Hortensia Maior
>
>
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79355 From: luciaiuliaaquila Date: 2010-08-14
Subject: Re: To all Cultores Deorum and to the Forum
Iulia Mariae Corneliae Lucillae Pompeiae Venatori Omnibusque S.P.D.

>--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "C.Maria Caeca" <c.mariacaeca@...> wrote:
>I claim no mantle of authority, as you imply, and my greatest joy would be to have our Virgo Maxima back with us.

Gaia Maria, I made no such claims against you. You know me better than that – I would have said that had I thought that. What I did say I would not discuss it, because like you, I have to research the issue which has to do solely with the sacra publica. So it follows that I had not even giving thoughts regarding yours or anyone's authority.
Please do not be defensive, we have had way too much of this and it gets us nowhere but perpetuate the discord and lead to more misunderstanding – we must all take the high road, choose our battles carefully and get down to what is important.
Judging by the past few days we all would be well served if we thought first before typing and it also may serve well to not jump to conclusions that are not there.
I applaud your devotion to Vesta and your willingness to serve to the Respublica;) Gratias tibi ago.

Statia – You are so very welcome!
Flavia– You are welcome as well! I personally appreciate your devotion to Vesta as well. At this time it is very important to keep Her in all of our hearts.

Pompeia – You're very welcome:), please read what I wrote to Maria. If you see contradictions in what I said it is because you may be reading them into what I wrote. Confrontational posts do upset concordia. The evidence of discord is riddled throughout the threads on the forum. Both you and I have been also guilty of this – albeit to a much lesser extent than the frequent posters. I do not know you personally and I have heard many good things about your past service to the Respublica, however all I have seen personally is that of late you appear mainly to confront rather than discuss and I believe this is because that has become the expectation of the current state of our culture. I ask you, si placet, to not allow your dissatisfaction with Nova Roma color your interpretation of my words. Gratias tibi:)
Confrontation is not in itself bad, some is healthy but we here in NR rarely seem to come up for air; it is counterproductive and eroding Her day after day.
Mistrust and confrontation have become the rule of the day – every one of us has to make a concerted effort to change this around.

I shall not argue, nor shall I continue in such a discussion.

Venii – You're so very welcome! I thought maybe we might need a bit of inspirational beauty and love to brighten up all of our outlooks!

Valete optime!

Julia


--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Publius Ullerius Stephanus Venator <famila.ulleria.venii@...> wrote:
>
> Salve L Iulia;
>
> Gratias tibi ago for the link to the photos. The sight of them
> brought a little mist to the eyes of this aging, sometimes grumbly,
> bearcat of a poet.
>
> It was good to see so many young folk, with such obvious joy of the day!
>
> Vale - Venator
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79356 From: rory12001 Date: 2010-08-14
Subject: Re: new list Conventus Matronarum
Edpol! since it's a wall fresco in the Louvre, I suggest you report VROMA for spreading culture!

Rofl; just shows you what this list consists of : dumb and dumber.
http://www.vroma.org/

The VRoma Project is first and foremost a community of scholars, both teachers and students, who create online resources for teaching about the Latin language and ancient Roman culture. The project was initially funded by a $190,000 National Endowment for the Humanities Teaching with Technology grant in 1997. The two major components of the project are its online learning environment (MOO), which has received several favorable external reviews, and its collection of internet resources. The VRoma MOO requires logging on as a guest or through your personal character and password, but all the web resources are freely accessible on the internet.

wall painting—two women feeding a pet deer; Roman, from Pompeii, first century CE
smaller version; detail: deer.
Paris, Louvre Museum. Credits: Barbara McManus, 2005
http://www.vroma.org/images/mcmanus_images/womendeer.jpg

M. Hortensia Maior

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Robert Woolwine <robert.woolwine@...> wrote:
>
> Maior you might want to change that picture there in case kids see it....it
> is potentially pornographic.
>
> Vale,
>
> Sulla
>
> On Sat, Aug 14, 2010 at 12:24 PM, rory12001 <rory12001@...> wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > Salvete;
> > I've started a new list Conventus Matronarum for women who are interested
> > in Roman history, religio, culture, Latin,
> >
> > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/conventus_matronarum/
> >
> > it's a place for friendship, good discussions & none of crap that exists on
> > the ML
> >
> > all matrones are cordially invited to join the list;
> >
> > M. Hortensia Maior
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79357 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2010-08-14
Subject: Re: new list Conventus Matronarum
Ave,

I did not ask you where you got it from. My concern is regarding Yahoo
Terms of Service and the minors on THIS list. As you and Scholastica point
out about Minors on this list. It is all about a question of consistency.
You advertised your list, containing a potentially pornographic picture on
your page. Nothing more and nothing less. Did you even consider the fact
that there are minors on this list?

Vale,

Sulla



On Sat, Aug 14, 2010 at 1:14 PM, rory12001 <rory12001@...> wrote:

>
>
> Edpol! since it's a wall fresco in the Louvre, I suggest you report VROMA
> for spreading culture!
>
> Rofl; just shows you what this list consists of : dumb and dumber.
> http://www.vroma.org/
>
> The VRoma Project is first and foremost a community of scholars, both
> teachers and students, who create online resources for teaching about the
> Latin language and ancient Roman culture. The project was initially funded
> by a $190,000 National Endowment for the Humanities Teaching with Technology
> grant in 1997. The two major components of the project are its online
> learning environment (MOO), which has received several favorable external
> reviews, and its collection of internet resources. The VRoma MOO requires
> logging on as a guest or through your personal character and password, but
> all the web resources are freely accessible on the internet.
>
> wall painting�two women feeding a pet deer; Roman, from Pompeii, first
> century CE
> smaller version; detail: deer.
> Paris, Louvre Museum. Credits: Barbara McManus, 2005
> http://www.vroma.org/images/mcmanus_images/womendeer.jpg
>
> M. Hortensia Maior
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com <Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com>, Robert
> Woolwine <robert.woolwine@...> wrote:
> >
> > Maior you might want to change that picture there in case kids see
> it....it
> > is potentially pornographic.
> >
> > Vale,
> >
> > Sulla
> >
> > On Sat, Aug 14, 2010 at 12:24 PM, rory12001 <rory12001@...> wrote:
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > Salvete;
> > > I've started a new list Conventus Matronarum for women who are
> interested
> > > in Roman history, religio, culture, Latin,
> > >
> > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/conventus_matronarum/
> > >
> > > it's a place for friendship, good discussions & none of crap that
> exists on
> > > the ML
> > >
> > > all matrones are cordially invited to join the list;
> > >
> > > M. Hortensia Maior
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
>
>
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79358 From: Gaius Vipsanius Agrippa Date: 2010-08-14
Subject: Re: Farewell, Nova Roma
Salvete

You are correct, sir.  Alanis Morrisette did play God.  I liked the ending as well, when our suspicions are confirmed and that God is indeed Canadian.

Snooch to the nooch,
Silent Agrippa

--- On Sat, 8/14/10, Cato <catoinnyc@...> wrote:

From: Cato <catoinnyc@...>
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Farewell, Nova Roma
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Received: Saturday, August 14, 2010, 10:58 AM







 









Cato Liviae sal.



Alanis Morissette, I think it was! It was pretty awesome :)



Vale,



Cato



--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "L. Livia Plauta" <livia.plauta@...> wrote:

>

> Salve Sulla,

> Maior's posts don't remind me of it, but here you mention one my favourite

> films. It's certainly one of the most hilarious films in the history of

> cinema. I specially like the end, when it turns our God is a woman.

>

> Vale,

> Livia

>

> > Ave,

> >

> > I understand what you are saying, but to relate it to the situation along

> > this thread, when Maior posts, for some reason I am reminded of the movie

> > Dogma. A very good Kevin Smith movie where they are constantly saying how

> > blind belief in Dogma is what is allowing the two Angels (Ben Affleck and

> > Matt Damon) for the end of the Earth. If you haven't seen this movie

> > Affleck and Damon are two angels and they are trying to get back to Heaven

> > and they found a loophole in Catholic Dogma (hence the name of the movie)

> > and it follows their attempt to get back to Heaven regardless of the

> > consequences and the other characters of the movie (Selma Hayeck, Chris

> > Rock, Fiorentino, and Alan Rickman play the other side who are trying to

> > prevent Affleck and Damon from finding a loophole in Catholic Dogma and

> > thus

> > bring about the end of the world. And the Linda Fieorintino (sp), along

> > with

> > Chris Rock keep trying to find a way for Linda to find her faith back in

> > the

> > Catholic Church and he keeps asking her if she believes and ultimately she

> > comes to the realization that she does not believe but has a good idea.

> > Maior BELIEVES. nothing more and nothing less. Facts, even one's in the

> > very text - do not alter her belief. Yes, taken to extreme you can either

> > have a psycopath and on the other spectrum, one I believe Maior tends to

> > fall into a single minded fanatic (but not charismatic).

> >

> > Vale,

> >

> > Sulla

> >

> > On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 9:43 PM, C.Maria Caeca

> > <c.mariacaeca@...>wrote:

> >

> >>

> >>

> >> Maria Caeca Sullae sal,

> >>

> >> um ...that ...is a non-question, containing as id does, your own opinion.

> >> However ...since you asked ...either in and of itself, or alone, is

> >> unbalanced. I have never thought that intellect and emotion are mutually

> >> exclusive, or should act in absolute opposition, creating an either/or

> >> situation. My view is that one needs both ...and one also needs to know

> >> when

> >> which is appropriate. Intellect without emotion can produce a brilliant

> >> psychopath: emotion without intellect can produce something equally

> >> dangerous ...a charismatic single minded fanatic. both are equally

> >> lethal,

> >> for different reasons.

> >>

> >> Well, you *did* ask, yes?

> >>

> >> Respectfully,

> >> Maria Caeca

> >>

> >>

> >> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

> >>

> >>

> >>

> >

> >

> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

> >

> >

> >

> > ------------------------------------

> >

> > Yahoo! Groups Links

> >

> >

> >

>






















[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79359 From: Belle Morte Statia Date: 2010-08-14
Subject: Re: new list Conventus Matronarum
Aeternia Maiori sal.


How nice, hope your list thrives and prospers...


Vale,
Aeternia

On Sat, Aug 14, 2010 at 12:24 PM, rory12001 <rory12001@...> wrote:

>
>
> Salvete;
> I've started a new list Conventus Matronarum for women who are interested
> in Roman history, religio, culture, Latin,
>
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/conventus_matronarum/
>
> it's a place for friendship, good discussions & none of crap that exists on
> the ML
>
> all matrones are cordially invited to join the list;
>
> M. Hortensia Maior
>
>
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79360 From: Marcus Prometheus Date: 2010-08-14
Subject: +Re: HAPPY 60TH BIRTHDAY QUINTILAINUS !
HAPPY BIRTHDAY to You Consul



also from Marcus Prometheus.



AUGURI !

Buon 60esimo

Compleanno



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79361 From: Gaius Tullius Valerianus Date: 2010-08-14
Subject: Re: new list Conventus Matronarum
Salve Maior,

I just peeked at your site (as a man, I assume I'm not the target
audience for a "matron" site, but I *am *interested in *all *things Roman,
and I figured I'd want to let any Roman ladies of my acquaintance know about
it. Anyway, just wanted to give you a heads-up on a Latin correction -
instead of "Salvete Matrones," it ought to read "Salvete Matronae" as
"matrona" is a first-declension noun (though it does look deceptively like a
3rd declension stem, doesn't it?). Anyway, I know you're always trying to
use and improve your Latin, I applaud your effort, and I wish you the best!

Vale,
~ Valerianus

On Sat, Aug 14, 2010 at 3:24 PM, rory12001 <rory12001@...> wrote:

>
>
> Salvete;
> I've started a new list Conventus Matronarum for women who are interested
> in Roman history, religio, culture, Latin,
>
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/conventus_matronarum/
>
> it's a place for friendship, good discussions & none of crap that exists on
> the ML
>
> all matrones are cordially invited to join the list;
>
> M. Hortensia Maior
>
>
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79362 From: Susan Date: 2010-08-14
Subject: Re: To all Cultores Deorum and to the Forum
Pompeia Iuliae populesque sal.



--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "luciaiuliaaquila" <luciaiuliaaquila@...> wrote:
>
> (snippage)

Caeca wrote (after offering what appeared to be ritual or prayers and a poem to Vesta):

> >I claim no mantle of authority,as you(Iulia)imply, and my greatest joy would be to have our Virgo Maxima back with us.

And Iulia replied:
>
> Gaia Maria, I made no such claims against you. You know me better than that – I would have said that had I thought that. What I did say I would not discuss it, because like you, I have to research the issue which has to do solely with the sacra publica.

Pompeia: Actually, that's not what I read from you at all. In message 79342 you alluded to "'certain perils' of allowing untrained camilla to assume such sacred duties........." , so I can see where Caeca was atleast uneasy, being a vestal trainee, although I agree there was no verbatim accusation on your part of her acting with religious ambition. But, I am curious that you are *now* saying above, in this post, that you have to research the issue of these 'certain perils'. How *certain* are they? Now, if you don't know that something has any basis in historical or practiced fact, then why caution the readers against it? Remember 'certain' means *fixed* or *inevitable*

(snippage)

Iulia wrote:

>
> Pompeia – You're very welcome:), please read what I wrote to Maria. If you see contradictions in what I said it is because you may be reading them into what I wrote. Confrontational posts do upset concordia. The evidence of discord is riddled throughout the threads on the forum.

Pompeia: No, I'm not reading too much into them..just what you have written. I rarely post in this forum any more, but I did read what you wrote to Caeca, and was compelled to comment. And I agree that further discussion of this religious item is *megamoot*, as your statement in question had no 'certain' basis in fact.

Iulia continues:


Both you and I have been also guilty of this – albeit to a much lesser extent than the frequent posters. I do not know you personally and I have heard many good things about your past service to the Respublica, however all I have seen personally is that of late you appear mainly to confront rather than discuss and I believe this is because that has become the expectation of the current state of our culture. I ask you, si placet, to not allow your dissatisfaction with Nova Roma color your interpretation of my words. Gratias tibi:)
> Confrontation is not in itself bad, some is healthy but we here in NR rarely seem to come up for air; it is counterproductive and eroding Her day after day.
> Mistrust and confrontation have become the rule of the day – every one of us has to make a concerted effort to change this around.
>
> I shall not argue, nor shall I continue in such a discussion.

Pompeia: I don't know what half of the above paragraph has to do with what I asked you initially. I suspect its a red herring, given your admitted lack of knowledge on the subject in question. I asked you for a simple clarification, which you immediately interpret as 'arguing'. You indicated to Caeca that she was being defensive. So are you :>). However, you are the curule aedile. You should not, in my view, issue statements of this religious magnitude without first confirming their validity. You might also consider that I was not the only one who responded to your initial post....

And as for the unpleasantness of all 5 or so posts I've made this year, I shall continue to deliver my dim view of the recent attempt of illegal appropriation of legislative power, and with that, the illegal appropriation of 501C3 public charity funds. I shall also question the spontaneous, about-faced behaviour of those who should know better (are there voodoo dolls around here? ) I am sorry Iulia if this behaviour is what you consider counterproductive. You can be assured that I will never be part of a 'concerted' effort to hand out blindfolds to the people in the name of "pleasantness" or "concordia".


>
(snippage)
>
> Vale
Pompeia

{...}
>
>
> > >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79363 From: C.Maria Caeca Date: 2010-08-14
Subject: clarification and apology
C. Maria Caeca omnibus in foro S. P. D.

First, let me clarify some things. I'm afraid I was a bit unclear, this
morning, and a legitimate concern has been raised, which I will now address.

What I am doing, and *all* that I am doing is offering prayers, as I was
taught by my beloved mentor, friend, and Virgo Maxima, Maxima Valeria
Messallina. I am not, and will not, do *anything* that exceeds my training.
I have neither the knowledge nor the aucturitas, and I am not so
presumptuous.

However, although my duties are extremely limited, I am a Priestess of
Vesta, and I have discussed what would be appropriate and inappropriate for
me do do with my mentor, at some length. I knew where my "line" was, and
was happy to stay well behind it ...but when citizens expressed genuine
concern, I felt it might bring solace to just say "I'm here, and my flame
burns". That was all I intended ...I would not even consider making a
sacrifice or doing a public ritual in the name of Nova Roma, though I ask
for protection and blessing for my people, as I have always, and will always
do.

Finally, I wish to publicly apologize (I have already done so, privately)
to L. Julia Aquila. My response to you was a purely emotional and
unbalanced reacting, and as such, entirely unacceptable. I am truly sorry,
for both my words and my hostile tone.

Respectfully,
Valete Bene,
C. Maria Caeca
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79364 From: eagled2 Date: 2010-08-14
Subject: Re: New Site Design
It's been a while since I last posted for feedback on this idea. I realize people may be busy but after a few days of no feedback even if some people are on vacation I think it's safe to say that no one is interested in my idea. I don't have a problem with that that's why I was asking for opinions I was just looking for ways to improve the idea if at all possible. Thank you for the feedback given. I have decided to work on this idea on my own just to make it easier for me to read the posts in these message boards. Again thanks for the feedback.

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "eagled2" <eagled2@...> wrote:
>
> Aulus Valerius Barbatus S.D.
> Quite a while ago I posted a message asking about a user forum website for communication instead of the email groups to make finding and reading messages easier. At that time I received a reply from on the the website administrators stating that they were working on a new design for the website that integrated all elements of the site better and all utilized a single login. He also mentioned the possibility of including a forum in this new site. I have not been able to find any information on the site regarding the progress of any such project. I was wondering if anyone knows of such a project and if it is still being worked on. I really like the idea of not just the forum but the integrated logins and a different look.
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79365 From: rory12001 Date: 2010-08-14
Subject: Re: new list Conventus Matronarum
Salve Valeriane;
many thanks for the correction, I appreciate it. I don't know why it felt like a 3rd declension..hmm You're not our target unless, (which I doubt;-) you have a sudden desire to serve Cybele)...ridens.
maximas gratias
Maior
>
> Salve Maior,
>
> I just peeked at your site (as a man, I assume I'm not the target
> audience for a "matron" site, but I *am *interested in *all *things Roman,
> and I figured I'd want to let any Roman ladies of my acquaintance know about
> it. Anyway, just wanted to give you a heads-up on a Latin correction -
> instead of "Salvete Matrones," it ought to read "Salvete Matronae" as
> "matrona" is a first-declension noun (though it does look deceptively like a
> 3rd declension stem, doesn't it?). Anyway, I know you're always trying to
> use and improve your Latin, I applaud your effort, and I wish you the best!
>
> Vale,
> ~ Valerianus
>
> On Sat, Aug 14, 2010 at 3:24 PM, rory12001 <rory12001@...> wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > Salvete;
> > I've started a new list Conventus Matronarum for women who are interested
> > in Roman history, religio, culture, Latin,
> >
> > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/conventus_matronarum/
> >
> > it's a place for friendship, good discussions & none of crap that exists on
> > the ML
> >
> > all matrones are cordially invited to join the list;
> >
> > M. Hortensia Maior
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79366 From: Timothy or Stephen Gallagher Date: 2010-08-14
Subject: From the archives of SG-1
Salve

From the archives of SG-1

"This is Doctor Rodney McKay, He's Canadian.

USAF Col. O' Neill: "I am so sorry"

Vale

Paulinus





To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
From: canadaoccidentalis@...
Date: Sat, 14 Aug 2010 14:38:51 -0700
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: Farewell, Nova Roma






Salvete

You are correct, sir. Alanis Morrisette did play God. I liked the ending as well, when our suspicions are confirmed and that God is indeed Canadian.

Snooch to the nooch,
Silent Agrippa

--- On Sat, 8/14/10, Cato <catoinnyc@...> wrote:

From: Cato <catoinnyc@...>
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Farewell, Nova Roma
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Received: Saturday, August 14, 2010, 10:58 AM



Cato Liviae sal.

Alanis Morissette, I think it was! It was pretty awesome :)

Vale,

Cato

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "L. Livia Plauta" <livia.plauta@...> wrote:

>

> Salve Sulla,

> Maior's posts don't remind me of it, but here you mention one my favourite

> films. It's certainly one of the most hilarious films in the history of

> cinema. I specially like the end, when it turns our God is a woman.

>

> Vale,

> Livia

>

> > Ave,

> >

> > I understand what you are saying, but to relate it to the situation along

> > this thread, when Maior posts, for some reason I am reminded of the movie

> > Dogma. A very good Kevin Smith movie where they are constantly saying how

> > blind belief in Dogma is what is allowing the two Angels (Ben Affleck and

> > Matt Damon) for the end of the Earth. If you haven't seen this movie

> > Affleck and Damon are two angels and they are trying to get back to Heaven

> > and they found a loophole in Catholic Dogma (hence the name of the movie)

> > and it follows their attempt to get back to Heaven regardless of the

> > consequences and the other characters of the movie (Selma Hayeck, Chris

> > Rock, Fiorentino, and Alan Rickman play the other side who are trying to

> > prevent Affleck and Damon from finding a loophole in Catholic Dogma and

> > thus

> > bring about the end of the world. And the Linda Fieorintino (sp), along

> > with

> > Chris Rock keep trying to find a way for Linda to find her faith back in

> > the

> > Catholic Church and he keeps asking her if she believes and ultimately she

> > comes to the realization that she does not believe but has a good idea.

> > Maior BELIEVES. nothing more and nothing less. Facts, even one's in the

> > very text - do not alter her belief. Yes, taken to extreme you can either

> > have a psycopath and on the other spectrum, one I believe Maior tends to

> > fall into a single minded fanatic (but not charismatic).

> >

> > Vale,

> >

> > Sulla

> >

> > On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 9:43 PM, C.Maria Caeca

> > <c.mariacaeca@...>wrote:

> >

> >>

> >>

> >> Maria Caeca Sullae sal,

> >>

> >> um ...that ...is a non-question, containing as id does, your own opinion.

> >> However ...since you asked ...either in and of itself, or alone, is

> >> unbalanced. I have never thought that intellect and emotion are mutually

> >> exclusive, or should act in absolute opposition, creating an either/or

> >> situation. My view is that one needs both ...and one also needs to know

> >> when

> >> which is appropriate. Intellect without emotion can produce a brilliant

> >> psychopath: emotion without intellect can produce something equally

> >> dangerous ...a charismatic single minded fanatic. both are equally

> >> lethal,

> >> for different reasons.

> >>

> >> Well, you *did* ask, yes?

> >>

> >> Respectfully,

> >> Maria Caeca

> >>

> >>

> >> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

> >>

> >>

> >>

> >

> >

> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

> >

> >

> >

> > ------------------------------------

> >

> > Yahoo! Groups Links

> >

> >

> >

>

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]





[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79367 From: Gaius Tullius Valerianus Date: 2010-08-14
Subject: Re: new list Conventus Matronarum
Salve Maior,

No problem! And no, I'm no Attis, the Magna Mater will just have to get
along without me :)

Vale!

On Sat, Aug 14, 2010 at 8:03 PM, rory12001 <rory12001@...> wrote:

>
>
> Salve Valeriane;
> many thanks for the correction, I appreciate it. I don't know why it felt
> like a 3rd declension..hmm You're not our target unless, (which I doubt;-)
> you have a sudden desire to serve Cybele)...ridens.
> maximas gratias
> Maior
>
> >
> > Salve Maior,
> >
> > I just peeked at your site (as a man, I assume I'm not the target
> > audience for a "matron" site, but I *am *interested in *all *things
> Roman,
> > and I figured I'd want to let any Roman ladies of my acquaintance know
> about
> > it. Anyway, just wanted to give you a heads-up on a Latin correction -
> > instead of "Salvete Matrones," it ought to read "Salvete Matronae" as
> > "matrona" is a first-declension noun (though it does look deceptively
> like a
> > 3rd declension stem, doesn't it?). Anyway, I know you're always trying to
> > use and improve your Latin, I applaud your effort, and I wish you the
> best!
> >
> > Vale,
> > ~ Valerianus
> >
> > On Sat, Aug 14, 2010 at 3:24 PM, rory12001 <rory12001@...> wrote:
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > Salvete;
> > > I've started a new list Conventus Matronarum for women who are
> interested
> > > in Roman history, religio, culture, Latin,
> > >
> > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/conventus_matronarum/
> > >
> > > it's a place for friendship, good discussions & none of crap that
> exists on
> > > the ML
> > >
> > > all matrones are cordially invited to join the list;
> > >
> > > M. Hortensia Maior
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
>
>
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79368 From: luciaiuliaaquila Date: 2010-08-14
Subject: Re: To all Cultores Deorum and to the Forum
Salve Pompeia,

Bless your heart;)

Vale,

Julia
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79369 From: luciaiuliaaquila Date: 2010-08-14
Subject: Re: clarification and apology
Salve Gaia Maria,

I sent you a looooong reply in privatum;) I appreciate the apology, gratias, but you did not need to do so, I understand.

Vale,

Julia

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "C.Maria Caeca" <c.mariacaeca@...> wrote:
>
> C. Maria Caeca omnibus in foro S. P. D.
>
> First, let me clarify some things. I'm afraid I was a bit unclear, this
> morning, and a legitimate concern has been raised, which I will now address.
>
> What I am doing, and *all* that I am doing is offering prayers, as I was
> taught by my beloved mentor, friend, and Virgo Maxima, Maxima Valeria
> Messallina. I am not, and will not, do *anything* that exceeds my training.
> I have neither the knowledge nor the aucturitas, and I am not so
> presumptuous.
>
> However, although my duties are extremely limited, I am a Priestess of
> Vesta, and I have discussed what would be appropriate and inappropriate for
> me do do with my mentor, at some length. I knew where my "line" was, and
> was happy to stay well behind it ...but when citizens expressed genuine
> concern, I felt it might bring solace to just say "I'm here, and my flame
> burns". That was all I intended ...I would not even consider making a
> sacrifice or doing a public ritual in the name of Nova Roma, though I ask
> for protection and blessing for my people, as I have always, and will always
> do.
>
> Finally, I wish to publicly apologize (I have already done so, privately)
> to L. Julia Aquila. My response to you was a purely emotional and
> unbalanced reacting, and as such, entirely unacceptable. I am truly sorry,
> for both my words and my hostile tone.
>
> Respectfully,
> Valete Bene,
> C. Maria Caeca
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79370 From: C.Maria Caeca Date: 2010-08-14
Subject: Re: clarification and apology
C. Maria Caeca L. Juliae sal,

Private message received and read, thank you! And ...yes, I did need to apologize to you, and in public, because the original action took place in public, and therefore, so must my apology to you.

Vale quam optime, Amica,
CMC

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79372 From: Nero Date: 2010-08-15
Subject: Mask(s) of the Manes
Watching HBO's Roma and doing my research online I found that when someone who died in Ancient Rome held the curule chair or was an Emperor their faces were preserved in wax and displayed in the atrium of a home. Using this I experimented with some 2.99 wax I bought at Hobby Lobby and was able to create a face mask of wax. I have placed this on my Lararium in the name of the Manes of those of the past(who I pray to every night) and cannot wait to get some sculpting clay and try out some others. I'm thinking my namesakes, Julius Caesar, Iunius Brutus, and Nero for a start. In my family I have not experienced the death of a close loved one and thus cannot make masks for them. Once I get the process down pat I would be willing to accept commissions for anyone wishing to follow in our forefather's steps and would not charge much.
I am curious if anyone else has tried either successfully or unsuccessfully to do the same? This mask is not perfect, the wax was really hot as the mold I was using was plastic and I had a terrible fear of burning my house down but it came out well for a first try.
Questions Comments?
Di Vos Incolumes Custodiant,
Nero.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79373 From: Kirsteen Wright Date: 2010-08-15
Subject: Re: clarification and apology
On Sun, Aug 15, 2010 at 12:51 AM, C.Maria Caeca <c.mariacaeca@...>wrote:

> .
> ....... I felt it might bring solace to just say "I'm here, and my flame
> burns". ........


I just want to say that, as far as I am concerned, yes it has brought great
solace to me to know that you are there serving Vesta.

It was love of Vesta that brought me to Nova Roma in the first place.
Privately, I had already dedicated my life to her. It is inconceivable, to
me, to picture a Rome in which Vesta's flame does not burn bright. I think
we are truly fortunate and it brings me great joy to know, that in such sad
and trying times, we have someone willing to serve Vesta and to keep her
flame alive.I pray Vesta will bless you and keep you and bring joy to your
hearth.

In gratitude
Flavia Lucilla Merula


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79374 From: marcushoratius Date: 2010-08-15
Subject: a. d. XVIII Kalendas Septembras: Romulus and the Curiones
M. Moravius Piscinus Horatianus, cultoribus Deorum, Quiritibus et omnibus salute plurimam dicit: Bene omnibus nobis.

Hodie est ante diem XVIII Kalendas Septembras; haec dies comitialis est:

ROMULUS AND THE EARLIEST SACERDOTES OF ROME

"To return to the government established by Romulus, I have thought the following things also worthy the notice of history. In the first place, he appointed a great number of persons to carry on the worship of the Gods. At any rate, no one could name any other newly-founded city in which so many priests and ministers of the Gods were appointed from the beginning. For, apart from those who held family priesthoods, sixty were appointed in his reign to perform by tribes and curiae the public sacrifices on behalf of the commonwealth; I am merely repeating what Terentius Varro, the most learned man of his age, has written in his Antiquities. In the next place, whereas others generally choose in a careless and inconsiderate manner those who are to preside over religious matters, some thinking fit to make public sale of this honor and others disposing of it by lot, he would not allow the priesthoods to be either
purchased for money or assigned by lot, but made a law that each curia should choose two men over fifty years of age, of distinguished birth and exceptional merit, of competent fortune, and without any bodily defects; and he ordered that these should enjoy their honors, not for any fixed period, but for life, freed from military service by their age and from civil burdens by the law.

"Furthermore, Romulus ordered one soothsayer out of each tribe to be present at the sacrifices. This soothsayer we call hieroskopos or "inspector of the vitals," and the Romans, preserving something of the ancient name, aruspex. He also made a law that all the sacerdotes of the Gods should be chosen by the curiae and that their election should be confirmed by those who interpret the will of the Gods by the art of divination." ~ Dionysius of Halicarnassus 2.21.1-3; 2.22.3

As Rome evolved, the curiae of Romulus were retained as the basic politico-religious organizations on a neighborhood by neighborhood basis. Each curia was led by a curio, with a Magister Curiorum elected from among them. Each curia also had a flamen, whose duties are not clear. The curio is mentioned occasionally as the one who led religious rites on behalf his curia.
One such occasion was during Fornacalia of February. Each curia had a sacullum, which may have been tended by the flamen. As districts of Roman cities were named after deities, or after a nearby temple of a deity, each the saculla of the various curiae would have been dedicated to different deities. But we hear, too, of another festival held in the curiae where each set up a table near their
saculla to receive offerings for Juno, or for a juno of some Goddess.

In the Late Republic the curiones gained political importance as a kind of ward chairmen. They were able to deliver the votes of their curia to anyone who gave the best offer. Bribing the curiones became a regular feature of elections. They also provided the street thugs used by Milo and Clodius. Therefore Augustus replaced the curiae by reorganizing the City into vici; each vicus then given its own hall and a sacullum; and Augustus personally went around the City presenting each vicus with statues of Lares. The statues thus became known as Lares Augustales, but had other names as well, as Augustus thought them to represent Lares Compitales. The Augustan statues originally held cornucopia and offered a patera, and later their image was transformed into the dancing Lares that are so familiar to us today. It is not known whether any sort of Lar was represented prior to Augustus or if the curiae originally held a cultus for Lares Compitales (Lares Compitales were in the countryside). The effect of the Augustan Restoration was to restore the vicus to a more religious oriented division of the City than the curiae had become.


THE TEMPLE OF DIANA AT EPHESUS.

"The most wonderful monument of Græcian magnificence, and one that merits our genuine admiration, is the Temple of Diana at Ephesus, which took one hundred and twenty years in building, a work in which all Asia joined. A marshy soil was selected for its site, in order that it might not suffer from earthquakes, or the chasms which they produce. On the other hand, again, that the foundations of so vast a pile might not have to rest upon a loose and shifting bed, layers of trodden charcoal were placed beneath, with fleeces2 covered with wool upon the top of them. The entire length of the temple is four hundred and twenty-five feet, and the breadth two hundred and twenty-five. The columns are one hundred and twenty-seven in number, and sixty feet in height, each of them presented by a different king. Thirty-six of these columns are carved, and one of them by the hand of Scopas. Chersiphron was the architect who presided over the work. The great marvel in this building is, how such ponderous Architraves could possibly have been raised to so great a height. This, however, the architect effected by means of bags filled with sand, which he piled up upon an inclined plane until they reached beyond the capitals of the columns; then, as he gradually emptied the lower bags, the architraves insensibly settled in the places assigned them. But the greatest difficulty of all was found, in laying the lintel which he placed over the entrance-doors. It was an enormous mass of stone, and by no possibility could it be brought to lie level upon the jambs which formed its bed; in consequence of which, the architect was driven to such a state of anxiety and desperation as to contemplate suicide. Wearied and quite worn out by such thoughts as these, during the night, they say, he beheld in a dream the Goddess in honor of whom the temple was being erected; Who exhorted him to live on, for that She Herself had placed the stone in its proper position. And such, in fact, next morning, was found to be the case, the stone apparently having come to the proper level by dint of its own weight. The other decorations of this work would suffice to fill many volumes, but they do not tend in any way to illustrate the works of Nature." ~ G. Plinius Secundus, Historia Naturalis 36.21


Our thought for today are the words of Socrates, as quoted by L. Annaeus Seneca, On the Happy Life 26.4:

"Upon nothing am I more strongly resolved than not to change my course of life to suit your opinion. Heap upon me from every side the usual taunts; I shall not consider that you are railing at me, but that you are wailing like poor little babies."
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79375 From: Cato Date: 2010-08-15
Subject: Re: a. d. XVIII Kalendas Septembras: Romulus and the Curiones
Cato Piscino sal.

The correctly-declined name of the month is "Septembris", not "Septembras"; you make this same mistake with the name of practically every month. And today is a dies fastus, not comitialis:

Hodiernus dies est ante diem XVIII Kalendas Septembris; haec dies fastus est.

Vale,

Cato

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "marcushoratius" <MHoratius@...> wrote:

> Hodie est ante diem XVIII Kalendas Septembras; haec dies comitialis est:
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79376 From: C.Maria Caeca Date: 2010-08-15
Subject: A little something ...
C. Maria Caeca omnibus in foro S. P. D.

I hope you don't mind, but I'd like to share yet another inept attempt at
writing with you. There won't be more ...probably for a long time (smile).

CMC

Vesta's Fire



On the hearth at the heart

An Ancient city sleeps:

In the darkness,

In the silence,

Vesta's fire burns,

Strong and bright.



Careful, tender hands

Reach into light to tend;

Whispered prayers float

Like a soft breeze upon

The sleeping stillness



There is light.

There is safety.





So it was, in long past times,

And so it is, again,. Her fire

May burn low, but it will leap

Into exuberant brilliance, always.



Her Fire may die. It will be relit, always.

For there will always be tender, reverent

Hands to tend .loving, whispered prayers

In the darkest hours of the night

This is our unbroken lineage.



No malice, no irreverent act, no danger

Can destroy that which is eternal,



Rome .Nova Roma will abide in light

There is protection, here.

There is safety, here.

Her fire burns bright, here, and always always will.



C. Maria Caeca 8/15/2010
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79377 From: Publius Ullerius Stephanus Venator Date: 2010-08-15
Subject: Re: A little something ...
“It is not the critic who counts; not the man who points out how the
strong man stumbles, or where the doer of deeds could have done them
better.

"The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena, whose
face is marred by dust and sweat and blood, who strives valiantly; who
errs and comes short again and again; because there is not effort
without error and shortcomings; but who does actually strive to do the
deed; who knows the great enthusiasm, the great devotion, who spends
himself in a worthy cause, who at the best knows in the end the
triumph of high achievement and who at the worst, if he fails, at
least he fails while daring greatly.

"So that his place shall never be with those cold and timid souls who
know neither victory nor defeat.” - Theodore Roosevelt

Write on, C Maria, write on...you serve your Goddess, and thereby Nova
Roma, in my opinion, regardless of the titles and honors appended to
you name.

Did the Immortals reject worthy devotion before there was a College of Pontiffs?

I think not.

Venator
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79378 From: C.Maria Caeca Date: 2010-08-15
Subject: Re: A little something ...
Caeca Venii sal,

You honor me far beyond my merit, but I thank you for that and even more for
your kindness.

Vale quam optime,
C. Maria Caeca
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79379 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2010-08-15
Subject: Latin classes: last call for Grammatica Latina
A. Tullia Scholastica quiritibus tironibus sociis peregrinisque bonae
voluntatis S.P.D.

Time is getting short to register for our Grammatica Latina classes in
particular, for Grammatica I will begin on Monday, September 6th, the US
Labor Day holiday (though students need not appear until the following day),
and Grammatica II will begin in just two short weeks, on Monday, August
30th.

The text for the Grammatica classes is Wheelock¹s Latin, by Frederic
Wheelock, sixth edition, revised by LaFleur. This is readily available in
US college bookstores belonging to institutions which teach Latin as it is
very popular and is used in most such institutions of higher education,
though some prefer another text. It may also be ordered via the Wheelock
website <http://www.wheelockslatin.com>

As previously noted, the first semester of Grammatica Latina I covers
the first 11 lessons of this text, and the separate second semester course
covers the next 11 lessons. After the first week of the first semester,
during which three preliminary lessons are presented, a lesson from the text
is presented every Monday, and written homework is assigned in order to
solidify the concepts presented in the text. A similar program is observed
in the second semester course. In the intermediate level Grammatica II, we
now cover lessons 23-34 in the newly-separated first semester course, and
address the remaining lessons in the second semester course (lessons 35-40),
followed by readings from the text and other sources. We shall meet Caesar
and Cicero and Pliny and Horace and Catullus there, inter alios, and will
also learn some spoken Latin and possibly engage in activities such as are
conducted at the Latin-immersion conventicula.

As for the Sermo Latinus courses, which begin somewhat later to
accommodate the now-vacationing Europeans, we cover lessons 1-56 of the
Desessard Assimil text in the separate Sermo I course, and lessons 57-101 in
the separate Sermo II one, while all 101 lessons are covered in the Combined
Sermo Latinus I & II course. The text for all of these is Le Latin Sans
Peine, by Clement Desessard. The text is also available in Italian; I
believe that the title is Il Latino senza Sforzo. Those who cannot read
either French or Italian should not worry; we have translated the text into
both English and Spanish for the benefit of our students, and reveal these
translations along with each lesson. The French version of the text has
gone out of print, but can be obtained online either by purchase of a used
copy or by file-sharing.
Sermo I & II Combined will begin September 13th, and the separate Sermo I
and Sermo II will begin a week later, on Monday, September 20th.

All of our Latin classes require effort on the part of the student, but
the benefits are great. Cultores should learn just what those prayers
actually say, and everyone should be able to pick up a Latin text and make
some sense out of it, if not read and understand it (though that should come
after a couple of years of Latin, though not just one year, except in the
Combined course). The Grammatica courses are taught by the traditional
method for the most part, and require memorization of vocabulary and
paradigms, inter alia; the Assimil Sermo courses are taught by a more
natural method, and work better for some students. The main focus of
Grammatica is learning to read Latin (though we do more than that), and that
of Sermo is learning to write and speak in Latin, though obviously reading
is not neglected. I strongly encourage everyone to make the effort to learn
the language of the Romans, which, although having a grammar complex by the
standards of English, has a small vocabulary as languages go, and that
grammar is quite regular. Quite honestly, if more of you do not enter our
classes and complete them, we shall stop offering them, or reduce their
frequency. I have moved all completing students who wished to continue into
the intermediate courses, but every year fewer and fewer students want to
take Grammatica I, and this year we have very few in the Combined class and
in Sermo I. The Sermo classes are unique in the world, and everyone should
take advantage of them while we can still offer them. A basic knowledge of
Latin is helpful, but not essential. The pace is brisk, but the textbook
lessons are short, with grammar addressed only every seventh lesson. Please
consider taking these courses; there may still be time to obtain the
Desessard text.

Valete.


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79380 From: aerdensrw Date: 2010-08-15
Subject: Re: Farewell, Nova Roma
Paulla Corva Gaudialis Maximae Valeriae Messallinae sal.

I am very, very sad to see you go, especially in the face of such bad news. I wish you and your mother the very best. Please know that my affection and admiration go with you. Vesta could not ask for a more devoted Sacerdos Vestalis or Nova Roma for a more worthy citizen. Six years is too short a time.

It has been a real pleasure becoming acquainted with you, and I hope that your health will permit you to return to us when you're able.

Vale in pace Deorum,

Paulla

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Maxima Valeria Messallina <maximavaleriamessallina@...> wrote:

> With great regret, I have to leave Nova Roma. My mother, who has Alzheimer's, suffered a very serious stroke two weeks ago. Her recovery will be lengthy and I must be there for her every step of the way.
> In addition to this, the results of recent tests done on me have revealed something neither my doctor nor I expected and now I am facing my own health crisis, with its own lengthy recovery. Dealing with both of these two crisises will take all my time, energy and resourses and, thus, I will not be able to devote anymore time or energy to Nova Roma.
> Therefore, I resign from all offices and positions, and also, my citizenship.

(snipped)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79381 From: James Hooper Date: 2010-08-15
Subject: Re: Latin classes: last call for Grammatica Latina
Salve Domina,
Not sure I will do very good, but I will give it a try.
Vale,
Gaius Pompeius Marcellus


On Sun, 15 Aug 2010 16:19:27 -0400
"A. Tullia Scholastica" <flavia@...> wrote:
> A. Tullia Scholastica quiritibus tironibus sociis peregrinisque bonae
> voluntatis S.P.D.
>
> Time is getting short to register for our Grammatica Latina classes in
> particular, for Grammatica I will begin on Monday, September 6th, the US
> Labor Day holiday (though students need not appear until the following day),
> and Grammatica II will begin in just two short weeks, on Monday, August
> 30th.
>
> The text for the Grammatica classes is Wheelock¹s Latin, by Frederic
> Wheelock, sixth edition, revised by LaFleur. This is readily available in
> US college bookstores belonging to institutions which teach Latin as it is
> very popular and is used in most such institutions of higher education,
> though some prefer another text. It may also be ordered via the Wheelock
> website <http://www.wheelockslatin.com>
>
> As previously noted, the first semester of Grammatica Latina I covers
> the first 11 lessons of this text, and the separate second semester course
> covers the next 11 lessons. After the first week of the first semester,
> during which three preliminary lessons are presented, a lesson from the text
> is presented every Monday, and written homework is assigned in order to
> solidify the concepts presented in the text. A similar program is observed
> in the second semester course. In the intermediate level Grammatica II, we
> now cover lessons 23-34 in the newly-separated first semester course, and
> address the remaining lessons in the second semester course (lessons 35-40),
> followed by readings from the text and other sources. We shall meet Caesar
> and Cicero and Pliny and Horace and Catullus there, inter alios, and will
> also learn some spoken Latin and possibly engage in activities such as are
> conducted at the Latin-immersion conventicula.
>
> As for the Sermo Latinus courses, which begin somewhat later to
> accommodate the now-vacationing Europeans, we cover lessons 1-56 of the
> Desessard Assimil text in the separate Sermo I course, and lessons 57-101 in
> the separate Sermo II one, while all 101 lessons are covered in the Combined
> Sermo Latinus I & II course. The text for all of these is Le Latin Sans
> Peine, by Clement Desessard. The text is also available in Italian; I
> believe that the title is Il Latino senza Sforzo. Those who cannot read
> either French or Italian should not worry; we have translated the text into
> both English and Spanish for the benefit of our students, and reveal these
> translations along with each lesson. The French version of the text has
> gone out of print, but can be obtained online either by purchase of a used
> copy or by file-sharing.
> Sermo I & II Combined will begin September 13th, and the separate Sermo I
> and Sermo II will begin a week later, on Monday, September 20th.
>
> All of our Latin classes require effort on the part of the student, but
> the benefits are great. Cultores should learn just what those prayers
> actually say, and everyone should be able to pick up a Latin text and make
> some sense out of it, if not read and understand it (though that should come
> after a couple of years of Latin, though not just one year, except in the
> Combined course). The Grammatica courses are taught by the traditional
> method for the most part, and require memorization of vocabulary and
> paradigms, inter alia; the Assimil Sermo courses are taught by a more
> natural method, and work better for some students. The main focus of
> Grammatica is learning to read Latin (though we do more than that), and that
> of Sermo is learning to write and speak in Latin, though obviously reading
> is not neglected. I strongly encourage everyone to make the effort to learn
> the language of the Romans, which, although having a grammar complex by the
> standards of English, has a small vocabulary as languages go, and that
> grammar is quite regular. Quite honestly, if more of you do not enter our
> classes and complete them, we shall stop offering them, or reduce their
> frequency. I have moved all completing students who wished to continue into
> the intermediate courses, but every year fewer and fewer students want to
> take Grammatica I, and this year we have very few in the Combined class and
> in Sermo I. The Sermo classes are unique in the world, and everyone should
> take advantage of them while we can still offer them. A basic knowledge of
> Latin is helpful, but not essential. The pace is brisk, but the textbook
> lessons are short, with grammar addressed only every seventh lesson. Please
> consider taking these courses; there may still be time to obtain the
> Desessard text.
>
> Valete.
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79382 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2010-08-15
Subject: Avitus' protreptic to Nova Roma
A. Tullia Scholastica quiritibus, sociis, peregrinisque bonae voluntatis
S.P.D.

Please find below a multilingual protreptic for Latin (specifically for
the Sermo Latinus courses) written specially for Nova Romans by our Avitus,
who is a well-known European Latinist known for his fluency in Latin. As I
do not know Spanish or Italian, I cannot correctly modify the dates, etc.,
in this document, which was written some years ago, but have done my best.
Some references are to our former site at the Academia Thules, whose course
server perished in November of 2008, so I have deleted those. Anyone
wishing to take either the Sermo Latinus courses or the Grammatica Latina
ones must contact me for correct information and to verify the possession of
the text, which is required before admission. Perhaps our Spanish-speaking
or Italian-speaking citizens could copy the relevant portions and post them
to their provincial lists. The French-speaking ones already seem to know
Latin...


DE LINGUÁ LATINÁ IN NR: Learn to speak LATIN, join our Latin courses!

DE LINGUÁ LATINÁ IN NR: Learn to speak LATIN, the language of our
forefathers!


A. Tullia Scholastica concivibus optimis suís


We all know that the aim of Nova Roma (cf.

http://www.novaroma.org/main.html at the bottom of the page) is to bring
about a general revival of all aspects of Roman civilisation, from politics
to religion, from philosophy to cookery or literature or the arts, a core
aspect of that Roman culture being the Virtues that gave a small city on the
banks of the Tiber the moral and practical strength to govern much of the
world, virtues that are most sorely lacking in our society today.

It can escape no-one, though, that there is only one language in which those
virtues and that culture and civilisation ever found their most authentic
and universal expression. The language Rome spoke was LATIN. The Latin
language is the most apt and only authentic vehicle to fully express the
Roman culture, to gain access to her literature, her ideas and philosophies,
to immerse oneself in her ethics and virtues, and to not only understand but
also intimately adopt and perfectly embody her complete world-view and way
of life; it is also the only language in which the Roman religious rites can
be duly performed.


Nova Roma shows the essential importance of this language in all its
terminology: the different positions of government, the official names of
the laws and decrees, the names of the virtues are all expressed in Latin.

It is essential to promote the Lingua Latina and its revival in all
circumstances of life among our fellow citizens (cf.
http://www.novaroma.org/nr/Lingua_Latina).

Most people think that Latin is a dead language, as dead as the Roman
virtues or the culture it conveyed; but we, Nova Romans, know it doesn't
have to be like that, not for the virtues, not for the culture, not for the
language. Latin was the living language of our Roman forefathers, and it is
a language like all others, that can be learnt in a leisurely way and spoken
in all situations of everyday life. In fact, there is already a large
community of Latin speakers out there that prove that this is the case. One
can find lots of information about that in sites like
http://www.latinitatis.com/.

We shouldn't be left behind. We are the rightful depositaries of the Roman
culture and civilisation, and we should be able and most willing to use the
language of our ancestors as part of our all-encompassing Roman revival.

I know there are many people among us that have learnt some amount of Latin
before, but have forgotten so much that are now unable to deal with the
language of our ancestors by themselves; others will still remember enough
to read it, but feel nonetheless unprepared to use the language in an active
manner. There may be people who are even now learning Latin somewhere else,
or others who may never have studied Latin before. Anyone, I repeat, anyone,
from those with absolutely no previous knowledge of the language to those
who have learnt Latin in the past, or even those who are still learning it
elsewhere, but don't yet feel confident enough with it to use it actively,
will be able to benefit tremendously from my ³Sermo Latinus² courses.
Anyone, therefore, who wants to learn Latin in order to be able not only to
read its texts with understanding but also to write it with ease and
fluently to speak it in all situations so that the eternal idiom of our
forefathers is brought back to active life and everyday usage, is invited
and eagerly encouraged to join those courses.

I, the former Dean of the Faculty of Letters of the Academia Thules, a Latin
philologist fluent in the language and with a long teaching experience, am
offering to take you to the level of Latin at which you can start your
independent exploration of the sources, and actually bring back to active
life and everyday usage our eternal Latin language. On completion, you will
be able to enjoy the less convoluted Latin texts without being enslaved to
the dictionary, and will also be capable of Latin conversation at an
intermediate level.

My courses are going to start in a few weeks, on 13th September or 20th
September 2763 [2010], and I strongly encourage as many Nova Roma citizens
as possible to join in. If you want to do so, you will have to order the
material today!

You will be able to find much more detailed information about the courses,
as well about all others offered by the Facultas Litterarum and you are
invited to enrol as soon as possible.

Curate ut valeatis omnes!

Hispanicé:

DE LINGUÁ LATINÁ IN NR: Aprende a hablar LATÍN, apúntate a nuestros cursos
de Latín!
DE LINGUÁ LATINÁ IN NR: Aprende a hablar LATÍN, la lengua de nuestros
mayores!


DE LINGUÁ LATINÁ IN NR: Aprenda a hablar LATÍN, apúntese a nuestros cursos
de Latín!
DE LINGUÁ LATINÁ IN NR: Aprenda a hablar LATÍN, la lengua de nuestros
mayores!

DE LINGUÁ LATINÁ IN NR: Aprendé a hablar LATÍN, apuntáte a nuestros cursos
de Latín!
DE LINGUÁ LATINÁ IN NR: Aprendé a hablar LATÍN, la lengua de nuestros
mayores!

A. Tullia Scholastica concivibus Hispanis optimis suís
y concivibus Americanis optimis suís S·P·D

Todos sabemos que el objetivo de Nova Roma (cf.
http://www.novaroma.org/main.html) es una restauración general de todos los
aspectos de la civilización romana, desde la política a la religión, desde
la filosofía a la gastronomía o la literatura o las artes, siendo un aspecto
clave de esa cultura romana las Virtudes que dieron a una pequeña ciudad a
orillas del Tíber la fuerza moral y práctica para gobernar gran parte del
mundo, virtudes que se echan dolorosamente en falta en nuestra sociedad
actual.

A nadie se le escapa, sin embargo, que hay una sola lengua en la que esas
virtudes y esa cultura encontraron jamás su más auténtica y universal
expresión. La lengua que hablaba Roma era el LATÍN. La lengua latina es el
vehículo más adecuado y el único que goza de legítima autenticidad para
expresar plenamente la cultura romana, para ganar acceso a su literatura,
sus ideas y filosofías, para empaparse de su ética y sus virtudes, y para no
sólo comprender, sino también adoptar íntimamente e incorporar a la
perfección su completa visión del mundo y modo de vida; es también la única
lengua en que pueden debidamente llevarse a cabo los ritos religiosos
romanos.


Nova Roma muestra la importancia esencial de esta lengua en toda su
terminología: los diferentes cargos de gobierno, los nombres oficiales de
leyes y decretos, los nombres de las virtudes están todos expresados en
latín.

Es esencial promover la Lingua Latina y su restablecimiento en todas las
circunstancias de la vida entre nuestros conciudadanos (cf.
http://www.novaroma.org/nr/Lingua_Latina).

La mayoría de la gente piensa que el latín es una lengua muerta, tan muerta
como las virtudes romanas o la cultura que expresaba; pero nosotros, como
novorromanos, sabemos que no tiene por qué ser así, ni con las virtudes, ni
con la cultura, ni con la lengua. El latín fue la lengua viva de nuestros
mayores romanos, y es una lengua como todas las demás, que puede aprenderse
de manera entretenida y hablarse en todas las situaciones de la vida diaria.
De hecho, existe ya una gran comunidad de hablantes de latín ahí fuera que
lo demuestra, y se puede encontrar gran cantidad de información al respecto
en sitios como

http://www.latinitatis.com/.

No nos podemos quedar atrás. Somos los legítimos depositarios de la cultura
y civilización romanas, y deberíamos ser capaces y tener la absoluta
voluntad de usar la lengua de nuestros mayores como parte de nuestra
omnicomprensiva restauración de lo romano.

Sé que hay mucha gente entre nosotros que ha aprendido algo de latín en el
pasado, pero han olvidado tanto que son ahora incapaces de aproximarse a la
lengua de nuestros ancestros por sí solos; otros recordarán todavía lo
suficiente para leerlo, pero no se sienten a pesar de todo preparados para
usar la lengua de manera activa. Puede haber gente que esté incluso ahora
aprendiendo Latín en algún otro lugar, u otros que puede que no hayan
estudiado nunca Latín. Cualquiera, repito, cualquiera, desde aquellos que no
tengan ningún conocimiento previo en absoluto de la lengua a los que la
hayan aprendido en el pasado, o incluso aquellos que la están aprendiendo
todavía en otro sitio, pero todavía no se sienten cómodos con ella como para
usarla activamente, podrán obtener un tremendo beneficio de mis cursos de
³Sermo Latinus.² Cualquiera, por tanto, que quiera aprender la lengua
latina para ser capaz no sólo de leer sus textos con entendimiento sino
también escribirla con facilidad y hablarla fluidamente en todas las
situaciones de manera que el idioma eterno de nuestros mayores vuelva a la
vida activa y al uso diario, está invitado y se le anima encarecidamente a
apuntarse a esos cursos.

Yo, quondam Decano de la Facultad de Letras de la Academia Thules, filólogo
latino nacido en Caesaraugusta (Hispania) y residente en Londinium (Anglia),
con absoluta fluidez en la lengua y con una prolongada experiencia
didáctica, me ofrezco a llevarles a un nivel de latín en el que podrán
empezar su exploración independiente de las fuentes, y, lo que es más,
devolver a la vida activa y al uso cotidiano nuestra eterna lengua latina.
Al terminar, podrán disfrutar los textos latinos no excesivamente retorcidos
sin depender servilmente del diccionario, y serán además capaces de
conversar en latín a nivel intermedio.


Mis cursos darán comienzo el 13 (SL I & II) o el 20 (SL I, SL II) de
septiembre de 2763 [2010], y recomiendo vehementemente al máximo número
posible de ciudadanos de Nova Roma América a que se apunten. Si desean
hacerlo, deberán solicitar el material desde hoy mismo!

Podrán informarse mucho más detalladamente sobre los cursos, así como sobre
todos los demás que ofrece la Facultas Litterarum, en y les invito a
matricularse lo más pronto posible.


Curate ut valeatis omnes!

Italicé:

DE LINGUÁ LATINÁ IN NR: Impara a parlare LATINO, iscriviti ai nostri corsi!
DE LINGUÁ LATINÁ IN NR: Impara a parlare LATINO, la lingua dei nostri
antenati!

A. Tullia Scholastica concivibus Italis optimis suís S·P·D

Tutti sappiamo che l'obiettivo di Nova Roma (cf.
http://www.novaroma.org/main.html) è un revival generale de tutti gli
aspetti della civiltà Romana, dalla politica alla religione, dalla filosofia
alla gastronomia o la letteratura o le arti, essendo un aspetto chiave di
quella cultura romana le virtù che han dato ad una piccola città sulle rive
del Tevere il morale e la forza pratica per governare il mondo, virtù che
sono penosamente mancanti nella nostra società odierna.

A nessuno sfugge tuttavia che c'è una sola lingua nella quale quelle virtù e
quella cultura trovarono mai la sua più autentica ed universale espressione.
La lingua che parlava Roma era il LATINO. La lingua Latina è il veicolo più
adatto e l'unico che gode di legitima autenticità per esprimere pienamente
la cultura romana, per guadagnare accesso alla sua letteratura, le sue idee
e filosofie, per permearsi dalla sua etica e le sue virtù, e per non solo
capire, ma anche adottare intimamente ed incorporare a perfezione la sua
completa visione del mondo ed il suo modo di vita; è anche l'unica lingua
nella quale possono debitamente adempirsi i riti religiosi romani.

Nova Roma mostra l'importanza essenziale di questa lingua in tutta la sua
terminologia: i diversi carichi di governo, i nomi ufficiali di leggi e
decreti, i nomi delle virtù vengono tutti espressi in latino.

È essenziale di promuovere la Lingua Latina e il suo ristabilimento in tutte
le circostanze della vita fra i nostri concittadini (cf.
http://www.novaroma.org/lingua_latina.html).

La maggioranza della gente pensa che il latino è una lingua morta, così
morta come le virtù romane o la cultura che esprimeva; ma noi, come
novoromani, sappiamo che non deve essere necessariamente così, ne con le
virtù, ne con la cultura, ne con la lingua. Il latino fu la lingua viva dei
nostri antenati romani, ed è una lingua come tutte le altre, che può essere
imparata in maniera gradevole e parlarsi in tutte le situazioni della vita
quotidiana. Infatti, esiste già una grande comunità di parlanti di latino là
fuori chi lo prova, e si può trovare una gran quantità d'informazione in
questo rispetto in siti come

http://www.latinitatis.com/.

Non possiamo restare indietro. Siamo i legittimi depositari della cultura e
civiltà romane, e dovremmo essere capaci ed avere la assoluta volontà di
usare la lingua dei nostri maggiori come parte della nostra comprensiva
restaurazione d'ogni ciò ch'è romano.

So che c'è molta gente fra noi che ha imparato qualche latino nel passato,
ma hanno dimenticato così tanto che sonno adesso incapaci di approssimarsi
alla lingua dei nostri antenati per se stessi; altri ricorderanno ancora
abbastanza per leggerlo, ma non si sentono tuttavia in grado di usare la
lingua in maniera attiva. Può darsi che ci sia gente che stia anche adesso
imparando il latino in qualche altro posto, o altri che forse non hanno
studiato mai il latino. Chiunque, ripeto, chiunque, da quei che non abbiano
nessuna conoscenza previa assolutamente della lingua a quei che l'abbiano
imparato nel passato, o perfino quei che la stanno imparando ancora da
qualche parte, ma ancora non si sentono a suo agio con essa per usarla
attivamente, potranno ottenere un tremendo beneficio dai miei corsi.
Chiunque dunque voglia imparare la lingua latina per essere capace non solo
di leggere i suoi testi con intendimento ma anche scriverla con facilità e
parlarla fluidamente in ogni situazione in modo che l'idioma eterno dei
nostri antenati torni alla vita attiva e all'uso quotidiano, è invitato e
incoraggiato caldamente a iscriversi nei miei corsi.

Io, filologo latino nato a Caesaraugusta (Hispania) e residente a Londinium
(Anglia), con assoluta fluidità nella lingua e una prolungata esperienza
didattica, mi offro a portarvi ad un livello di latino nel quale potrete
cominciare la vostra esplorazione indipendente delle fonti, e anzi riportare
alla vita attiva e l'uso quotidiano la lingua eterna dei nostri maggiori.
Alla fine, potrete godere i testi latini non troppo contorti senza dipendere
servilmente dal dizionario, e sarete anche capaci di conversare in latino ad
un livello intermedio.

I miei corsi cominceranno il 13 (SL I & II) o 20 (SL I, SL II) di settembre
di 2757 [2004]. Il libro di testo è disponibile soltanto in francese ed in
italiano; è un'occasione unica, per cui ho voluto invitare caldamente il più
grande possibile numero di cittadini Italici di Nova Roma ad iscriversi. È
peccato, e una macchia appena comprensibile per questa speciale provincia
d'Italia, che l'anno scorso nessun citadino d'Italia abbia completato il
corso di latino.

Potrete informarvi molto più dettagliatamente sul corso e vi invito a
immatricularvi da.

Curate ut valeatis omnes!

Gallicé:

DE LINGVA LATINA IN NR: Apprenez à parler LATIN, inscrivez vous à nos cours!
DE LINGVA LATINA IN NR: Apprenez à parler LATIN, la langue de nos ancêtres!

A. Tullia Scholastica concivibus Gallis optimis suís S·P·D

Nous savons tous que l'objectif de Nova Roma (cf.
http://www.novaroma.org/main.html) est une restauration générale de tous les
aspects de la civilisation romaine, de la politique à la religion, de la
philosophie à la gastronomie, la littérature ou les arts; avec un aspect clé
de cette culture romaine dans les Vertus qui ont donné à une petite ville
des bords du Tibre la force morale et pratique de gouverner une grande
partie du monde, vertus qui font cruellement défaut dans la société
d'aujourd'hui.

Il n'échappe toutefois à personne qu'il y a une langue dans laquelle ces
vertus et cette culture ont trouvé leur plus authentique et universelle
expression. La langue que Rome parlait était le LATIN. La langue latine est
le vehicule le plus adéquate, le plus authentique et le plus légitime pour
exprimer pleinement la culture romaine, pour avoir accès à sa litterature, à
ses idées, à sa philosophie, pour s'imprégner de son éthique et de ses
vertus, et pour non seulement comprendre, mais aussi adhérer intimement et
parfaitement à sa vision du monde et à sa manière de vivre; elle est aussi
la seule langue dans laquelle on peut comme il faut exécuter les rites
religieux romains.


Nova Roma montre l'importance essentielle de cette langue dans toute sa
terminologie: les differentes charges de gouvernement, les noms officiels
des lois et décrets, les noms des vertus sont tous exprimés en latin.

Il est essentiel de promouvoir la Lingua Latina et d'en rétablir l'usage
dans toutes les circonstances de la vie parmi nos concitoyens (cf.
http://www.novaroma.org/lingua_latina.html).

La plupart des gens pensent que le latin est une langue morte, aussi morte
que les vertus romaines ou la culture qu'elle exprimait; mais nous, en tant
que neoromains, savons qu'on ne doit accepter une telle fatalité ni pour les
vertus, ni pour la culture, ni pour la langue. Le latin fut la langue
vivante de nos ancêtres latins, et c'est une langue comme les autres, qui
peut être apprise d'une manière agréable et être parlée dans toutes les
situations de la vie quotidienne. En fait, il éxiste déjà une vaste
communauté de gens qui, de nos jours, parlent latin, et l'on peut en trouver
la preuve en visitant des sites comme
http://www.latinitatis.com/.

Nous ne pouvons pas rester indifférents. Nous sommes les dépositaires
légitimes de la culture et de la civilisation romaines, et nous devrions
être capables et avoir la volonté absolue d'utiliser la langue de notres
ancêtres comme faisant part de notre restauration globale de la romanité.

Je sais que beaucoup d'entre nous ont appris quelque peu de latin autrefois,
mais ils ont tant oublié qu'ils sont maintenant bien incapables de se
frotter sans aide à la langue de nos ancêtres; d'autres se rappeleront
encore assez pour le lire, mais ils ne se sentent malgré tout prêts pour
utiliser la langue d'une façon active. Peut être il-y-a du monde qui est
même maintenant en train de l'apprendre dans un autre lieu, ou d'autres qui
peut être n'ont jamais étudié le latin. N'importe qui, je répéte, n'importe
qui, de ceux qui n'ont absolument aucune connaissance de la langue à ceux
qui l'ont appris autrefois, ou même ceux qui sont en train de l'apprendre
encore dans un autre lieu, mais ne se sentent encore à l'aise avec elle pour
s'en servir activement, ils pourront obtenir un formidable bénéfice de mes
cours. N'importe qui, par conséquent, qui veuille apprendre la langue latine
pour être capable pas simplement de lire ses textes avec compréhension mais
aussi de l¹écrire avec facilité et la parler fluidement dans toutes les
situations de manière que l'idiome eternel de nos aïeux retourne à la vie
active et à l'usage quotidien, il est invité et encouragé instamment à
s'inscrire dans mes cours.


Moi, philologue latin né à Caesaraugusta (Hispania) et résidant à Londinium
(Anglia), parlant couramment la langue et ayant une longue experience
didactique, je m'offre à vous porter à un niveau de latin par lequel vous
pourrez commencer votre exploration independante des sources, et même
utiliser dans la vie active et quotidienne notre éternelle langue latine. Au
final, vour pourrez apprécier des textes latins pas trop difficiles sans
dépendre servilement du dictionnaire, et vous serez aussi capables de
converser dans un latin de niveau intermédiaire.


Mes cours commenceront le 13 (SL I & II) ou le 20 (SL I, SL II) septembre
2763 [2010]. Le livre de texte est disponible seulement en français et en
italien (l'original ayant êté écrit par le français Clément Desessard); une
raison de plus pour inviter spécialement les citoyens de Nova Roma Gallia à
s'inscrire. C'est dommage, et une tache à peine compréhensible pour la
province, que l'année dernière aucun citoyen de la Gallia n'a complété le
cours de latin.

Vous pourrez vous informer beaucoup plus en détail sur le cours et je vous
invite a vous inscrire.

Curate ut valeatis omnes!





[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79383 From: Vedius Date: 2010-08-15
Subject: Re: Avitus' protreptic to Nova Roma
A. Tullia Scholastica wrote:
> A. Tullia Scholastica quiritibus, sociis, peregrinisque bonae voluntatis
> S.P.D.
>
> Please find below a multilingual protreptic for Latin

"Multilingual protreptic"?

Sweet Merciful Bloodstained Gods, woman. No wonder you're scaring off
the potential students.

Vedius, the plain-spoken
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79384 From: rory12001 Date: 2010-08-15
Subject: Re: Avitus' protreptic to Nova Roma
Salvete;
Minerva!, instead of relishing the new, I think this is the first time I've ever seen the word protreptic (and I'm going to look it up), there is the clamour to use a short anglo-saxon word.

I treasured the day Avitus critiqued my protasis; I thought: 'I've never received such an erudite insult in my life!'
Vivat Latinitas
M. Hortensia maior


Please find below a multilingual protreptic for Latin
>
> "Multilingual protreptic"?
>
> Sweet Merciful Bloodstained Gods, woman. No wonder you're scaring off
> the potential students.
>
> Vedius, the plain-spoken
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79385 From: Vedius Date: 2010-08-15
Subject: Re: Avitus' protreptic to Nova Roma
Perhaps to use a word that doesn't need to be looked up in the first
place, Anglo-Saxon or no...

rory12001 wrote:
> Salvete;
> Minerva!, instead of relishing the new, I think this is the first time I've ever seen the word protreptic (and I'm going to look it up), there is the clamour to use a short anglo-saxon word.
>
> I treasured the day Avitus critiqued my protasis; I thought: 'I've never received such an erudite insult in my life!'
> Vivat Latinitas
> M. Hortensia maior
>
>
> Please find below a multilingual protreptic for Latin
>
>> "Multilingual protreptic"?
>>
>> Sweet Merciful Bloodstained Gods, woman. No wonder you're scaring off
>> the potential students.
>>
>> Vedius, the plain-spoken
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79386 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2010-08-15
Subject: Re: Avitus' protreptic to Nova Roma
>
>
> A. Tullia Scholastica M. Hortensiae Majori Flavio Vedio Germanico quiritibus,
> sociis, peregrinisque bonae voluntatis S.P.D.
>
>
> Salvete;
> Minerva!, instead of relishing the new, I think this is the first time I've
> ever seen the word protreptic (and I'm going to look it up),
>
>
> ATS: I have seen it many times, mostly in regard to philosophy. It more
> or less means an exhortation, encouragement.
>
>
> there is the clamour to use a short anglo-saxon word.
>
> ATS: Yahoo doesn¹t want us to use those short Anglo-Saxon words
> here...and REAL Anglo-Saxon was equipped with the full armory of the Germanic
> languages: der Wörter, ein Wörter, irregular declensions, the whole schmear.
> My guess is that a lot of the words were anything BUT short. German ones
> certainly can grow quite nicely.
>
> I treasured the day Avitus critiqued my protasis; I thought: 'I've never
> received such an erudite insult in my life!'
>
> ATS: LOL! With him you will definitely get erudite...and multi-lingual!
> Cras Barcinonem discedet, ergo parum audiemus.
>
> Vivat Latinitas
>
> ATS: Rectissimé!
>
> M. Hortensia maior
>
> Valete!
>
>
> Please find below a multilingual protreptic for Latin
>> >
>> > "Multilingual protreptic"?
>> >
>> > Sweet Merciful Bloodstained Gods, woman. No wonder you're scaring off
>> > the potential students.
>> >
>> > Vedius, the plain-spoken
>> >
>
>
>




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79387 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2010-08-15
Subject: Re: Avitus' protreptic to Nova Roma
>
> A. Tullia Scholastica Flavio Vedio Germanico quiritibus, sociis,
> peregrinisque bonae voluntatis S.P.D.
>
>
>
> A. Tullia Scholastica wrote:
>> > A. Tullia Scholastica quiritibus, sociis, peregrinisque bonae voluntatis
>> > S.P.D.
>> >
>> > Please find below a multilingual protreptic for Latin
>
> "Multilingual protreptic"?
>
> Sweet Merciful Bloodstained Gods, woman. No wonder you're scaring off
> the potential students.
>
> ATS: Oh, I think it is the prospect of work which scares some of them.
> The word Latin all by itself can instill fear in some...
>
> However, we have a perfectly normal complement of students in both
> intermediate classes, and for the last two years have started Sermo I with 30
> students, most of whom are from outside Nova Roma. Many are Spanish speakers.
> Since the Europeans are on vacation, pretending to have lost their
> blackberries, blueberries, raspberries, apples, or whatever wireless net
> contraptions they have, plus are accustomed to starting class so late in the
> year that school would proceed through June and July, we have to keep nagging
> them. It does not help that the text is difficult to obtain, and very
> expensive when purchased...though it is available through file transfer.
>
> As for multilingual, Avitus used only four of the 15 languages he knows in
> this post, even omitting our belovèd Latin. Thus the text is indeed
> multilingual...and a protreptic, for it encourages people to study Latin,
> especially by participating in the Sermo Latinus courses.
>
> I do hope that none of the deities is in fact bloodstained...
>
>
> Vedius, the plain-spoken
>
> Vale, et valete,
>
> Scholastica the academic
>
>
>




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79388 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2010-08-15
Subject: Re: Latin classes: last call for Grammatica Latina
>
>
> A. Tullia Scholastica C. Pompeio Marcello S.P.D.
>
>
> Salve Domina,
> Not sure I will do very good, but I will give it a try.
>
>
> ATS: That¹s all anyone can do. Please arm yourself with the text
> (Wheelock or Assimil) and let me know when you have it. The Wheelock text is
> not terribly expensive and is readily available in English-speaking countries,
> though the Assimil one is neither easy to obtain nor cheap. It is, however,
> quite good, though the newer version of Assimil is horrid. If all else fails,
> too, Wheelock has self-teaching exercises and answers in the back of the book
> which will help with further learning. There are good reasons why this text
> is so popular, and this is one of them.
>
> Vale,
> Gaius Pompeius Marcellus
>
>
> Vale, et valete.
>
>
> On Sun, 15 Aug 2010 16:19:27 -0400
> "A. Tullia Scholastica" <flavia@... <mailto:flavia%40localnet.com> >
> wrote:
>> > A. Tullia Scholastica quiritibus tironibus sociis peregrinisque bonae
>> > voluntatis S.P.D.
>> >
>> > Time is getting short to register for our Grammatica Latina classes in
>> > particular, for Grammatica I will begin on Monday, September 6th, the US
>> > Labor Day holiday (though students need not appear until the following
>> day),
>> > and Grammatica II will begin in just two short weeks, on Monday, August
>> > 30th.
>> >
>> > The text for the Grammatica classes is Wheelock¹s Latin, by Frederic
>> > Wheelock, sixth edition, revised by LaFleur. This is readily available in
>> > US college bookstores belonging to institutions which teach Latin as it is
>> > very popular and is used in most such institutions of higher education,
>> > though some prefer another text. It may also be ordered via the Wheelock
>> > website <http://www.wheelockslatin.com>
>> >
>> > As previously noted, the first semester of Grammatica Latina I covers
>> > the first 11 lessons of this text, and the separate second semester course
>> > covers the next 11 lessons. After the first week of the first semester,
>> > during which three preliminary lessons are presented, a lesson from the
>> text
>> > is presented every Monday, and written homework is assigned in order to
>> > solidify the concepts presented in the text. A similar program is observed
>> > in the second semester course. In the intermediate level Grammatica II, we
>> > now cover lessons 23-34 in the newly-separated first semester course, and
>> > address the remaining lessons in the second semester course (lessons
>> 35-40),
>> > followed by readings from the text and other sources. We shall meet Caesar
>> > and Cicero and Pliny and Horace and Catullus there, inter alios, and will
>> > also learn some spoken Latin and possibly engage in activities such as are
>> > conducted at the Latin-immersion conventicula.
>> >
>> > As for the Sermo Latinus courses, which begin somewhat later to
>> > accommodate the now-vacationing Europeans, we cover lessons 1-56 of the
>> > Desessard Assimil text in the separate Sermo I course, and lessons 57-101
>> in
>> > the separate Sermo II one, while all 101 lessons are covered in the
>> Combined
>> > Sermo Latinus I & II course. The text for all of these is Le Latin Sans
>> > Peine, by Clement Desessard. The text is also available in Italian; I
>> > believe that the title is Il Latino senza Sforzo. Those who cannot read
>> > either French or Italian should not worry; we have translated the text into
>> > both English and Spanish for the benefit of our students, and reveal these
>> > translations along with each lesson. The French version of the text has
>> > gone out of print, but can be obtained online either by purchase of a used
>> > copy or by file-sharing.
>> > Sermo I & II Combined will begin September 13th, and the separate Sermo I
>> > and Sermo II will begin a week later, on Monday, September 20th.
>> >
>> > All of our Latin classes require effort on the part of the student, but
>> > the benefits are great. Cultores should learn just what those prayers
>> > actually say, and everyone should be able to pick up a Latin text and make
>> > some sense out of it, if not read and understand it (though that should
>> come
>> > after a couple of years of Latin, though not just one year, except in the
>> > Combined course). The Grammatica courses are taught by the traditional
>> > method for the most part, and require memorization of vocabulary and
>> > paradigms, inter alia; the Assimil Sermo courses are taught by a more
>> > natural method, and work better for some students. The main focus of
>> > Grammatica is learning to read Latin (though we do more than that), and
>> that
>> > of Sermo is learning to write and speak in Latin, though obviously reading
>> > is not neglected. I strongly encourage everyone to make the effort to
>> learn
>> > the language of the Romans, which, although having a grammar complex by the
>> > standards of English, has a small vocabulary as languages go, and that
>> > grammar is quite regular. Quite honestly, if more of you do not enter our
>> > classes and complete them, we shall stop offering them, or reduce their
>> > frequency. I have moved all completing students who wished to continue
>> into
>> > the intermediate courses, but every year fewer and fewer students want to
>> > take Grammatica I, and this year we have very few in the Combined class and
>> > in Sermo I. The Sermo classes are unique in the world, and everyone should
>> > take advantage of them while we can still offer them. A basic knowledge of
>> > Latin is helpful, but not essential. The pace is brisk, but the textbook
>> > lessons are short, with grammar addressed only every seventh lesson.
>> Please
>> > consider taking these courses; there may still be time to obtain the
>> > Desessard text.
>> >
>> > Valete.
>> >
>> >
>> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>> >
>
>
>




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79389 From: rory12001 Date: 2010-08-15
Subject: Re: Avitus' protreptic to Nova Roma
M.Hortensia Major A. Tulliae Scholasticae spd;
Deutche isn't so easy, what with those quirky separable prefixes, and long long word; can you say weltanschung;-)

Catalani non sunt hispanice loquentes (istas odere); ergo nonne latinam linguam discent?
valeas
Maior

-
> >
> > ATS: Yahoo doesn¹t want us to use those short Anglo-Saxon words
> > here...and REAL Anglo-Saxon was equipped with the full armory of the Germanic
> > languages: der Wörter, ein Wörter, irregular declensions, the whole schmear.
> > My guess is that a lot of the words were anything BUT short. German ones
> > certainly can grow quite nicely.
> >
> > I treasured the day Avitus critiqued my protasis; I thought: 'I've never
> > received such an erudite insult in my life!'
> >
> > ATS: LOL! With him you will definitely get erudite...and multi-lingual!
> > Cras Barcinonem discedet, ergo parum audiemus.
> >
> > Vivat Latinitas
> >
> > ATS: Rectissimé!
> >
> > M. Hortensia maior
> >
> > Valete!
> >
> >
> > Please find below a multilingual protreptic for Latin
> >> >
> >> > "Multilingual protreptic"?
> >> >
> >> > Sweet Merciful Bloodstained Gods, woman. No wonder you're scaring off
> >> > the potential students.
> >> >
> >> > Vedius, the plain-spoken
> >> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79390 From: gualterus_graecus Date: 2010-08-16
Subject: Re: Avitus' protreptic to Nova Roma
Salve,

"Deutsch" and "Weltanschauung".

Vale,

GG

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "rory12001" <rory12001@...> wrote:
>
>
> M.Hortensia Major A. Tulliae Scholasticae spd;
> Deutche isn't so easy, what with those quirky separable prefixes, and long long word; can you say weltanschung;-)
>
> Catalani non sunt hispanice loquentes (istas odere); ergo nonne latinam linguam discent?
> valeas
> Maior
>
> -
> > >
> > > ATS: Yahoo doesn¹t want us to use those short Anglo-Saxon words
> > > here...and REAL Anglo-Saxon was equipped with the full armory of the Germanic
> > > languages: der Wörter, ein Wörter, irregular declensions, the whole schmear.
> > > My guess is that a lot of the words were anything BUT short. German ones
> > > certainly can grow quite nicely.
> > >
> > > I treasured the day Avitus critiqued my protasis; I thought: 'I've never
> > > received such an erudite insult in my life!'
> > >
> > > ATS: LOL! With him you will definitely get erudite...and multi-lingual!
> > > Cras Barcinonem discedet, ergo parum audiemus.
> > >
> > > Vivat Latinitas
> > >
> > > ATS: Rectissimé!
> > >
> > > M. Hortensia maior
> > >
> > > Valete!
> > >
> > >
> > > Please find below a multilingual protreptic for Latin
> > >> >
> > >> > "Multilingual protreptic"?
> > >> >
> > >> > Sweet Merciful Bloodstained Gods, woman. No wonder you're scaring off
> > >> > the potential students.
> > >> >
> > >> > Vedius, the plain-spoken
> > >> >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79391 From: Gaia Valeria Pulchra Date: 2010-08-16
Subject: Sodalitas Familiarum
Valerianus and I have set up a sodalitas specifically aimed at families in
Nova Roma, and we would like to welcome anyone who feels that they would
like to join to check it out! The list will be moderated because we would
like to encourage the children of Nova Roma to participate as well. We hope
this becomes a safe and friendly place for families to discuss everything it
means to be a Roman family. Hope to see some new faces! Valete!

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/SodalitasFamiliarum/


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79392 From: mcorvvs Date: 2010-08-16
Subject: Re: Ides ritual performed by Sacerdos Iovis M.Octavius Corvus
Salvete collega,

At Ides Sext. the rite of Ides was not conducted due to misunderstanding with coincidence of the date of Ides and Dies Religiosus.
I, M.Octavius Corvus on behalf of People of Nova Roma performed Ides ritual for IOM on August 13th, using the pattern sent to me by PM M.Moravius Piscinus Horatianus, as usual. Ap. Furius Lupus assisted me.
Rite was performed before the altar of Iuppiter.
Sacrifice was: incense, libum, wine. During the ritual a group of small birds of about 10 (perhaps sparrows)came from left to right right behind the altar. I consider this as unfavourable sighn for our Res Publica.
Optime valete,

CORVVS


--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "mcorvvs" <mcorvvs@...> wrote:
>
> Salvete collega,
>
> At Ides Iunius the rite of Ides was not conducted due to misunderstanding with coincidence of the date of Ides and Dies Religiosus.
> I, M.Octavius Corvus on behalf of People of Nova Roma performed Ides ritual for IOM on June 17th, using the pattern sent to me by PM M.Moravius Piscinus Horatianus, as usual. T. Iunius Brutus ans Ap. Furius Lupus assisted me.
> Rite was performed before the altar of Iuppiter.
> Sacrifice was: incense, libum, wine. During the ritual there was a complete silencium. No birds movement was detedted. The smoke from the sacrifice went toward me and kept going in my direction, obstructing further ritual and pronouncing the prayers. I consider this like the sign that my offer was not accepted by the God.
> I repated the Ides ritual on June 19th. T. Iunius Brutus ans Ap. Furius Lupus assisted me again. No birds movement was detedted. But the smoke came in the north-east direction, what I consider as a sign of acceptance of our offering by Iuppiter.
>
> Optime valete,
>
> CORVVS
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79393 From: mcorvvs Date: 2010-08-16
Subject: FIRST NOVAROMAN MUNICIPIUM - MUNICIPIUM POLTAVA (SARMATIA) - APPROVE
On pr. Kal. Sex. (July 31-st) cives of first NovaRoman municipium celebrated the approval of thir Foedus by Senate of Nova Roma. 31 citizens of 36 were present and 5 guests invited.
At the moment Minicipium Poltava is waiting for appointment of its first duumviri for conductiong the election.
You can find FOEDUS and corresponding Senatus Consulta here: http://novaroma.org/nr/Senatus_consultum_de_Municipio_Poltava_(Nova_Roma)
Photos from this event can be found here: http://picasaweb.google.ru/m.octavius.corvus/CELEBRATINGMVNICIPIVMPOLTAVAAPPROVALBYSENATEOFNR#
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79394 From: mcorvvs Date: 2010-08-16
Subject: FERIAE PROV. SARMATIAE NOVAE ROMANAE II
From Kal. Sex. till a.d. VII Id. Sex. (August 1 - 7th) Second Novaroman
Sarmatian provincial festival FERIAE SARMATIAE was held in
Poltava.Program was:- Kal. Sex. - Immolatio;- a.d. IV Non. Sex. -
Sacrifice at the Holy Oaks (Dykanka, 25 km from Poltava);- pr. Non. Sex.
- Wedding ceremony by confarreatio for three couples conducted by
Pontifex Cn. Cornelius Lentulus and Sacerdos Iovis M. Octavius Corvus.-
a.d. VII Id. Sex. - Rite of VOTVM SARMATARVM. See the full text below.
- Rite of Consecration Augur M. Lucretius Agricola performed by Pontifex
Cn. Cornelius Lentulus. - Rite of consecrating the
Templum for building the Aedes of Iuppiter, performed by Pontifex Cn.
Cornelius Lentulus, Augur M. Lucretius Agricola and Sacerdos Iovis M.
Octavius Corvus.
FULL TEXT OF SARMATIAN VOTUM
Here, at the Altar of Iuppiter Perunus in Poltava, in the province
ofSarmatia of Nova Roma, I, M.Octavius Corvus, I, T. Iunius Brutus, I,
Ap. Furius Lupus, do give this Votum and swear to fulfilthe following:
Hic apud aram Iovis Peruni Poltavae in provincia Sarmatia Nova Romana,
ego, M.Octavius Corvus, ego, T. Iunius Brutus, ego, Ap. Furius Lupus,
hoc votum facio et in haec verba iuro me facturum:
- by the end of the first 9 years, starting from this day, to have
notless than 3 oppida in Sarmatia, 10 families living in one
neighborhood and small Temple of IuppiterPerunus(6x12 meters) built;
- uti primis IX annis exactis hocce die inceptis oppida non minus quam
III in Sarmatia condantur, X familiae in vicinitate vivant, aedesque
parva Iovis Peruni non minor VI XII metris construatur;
- by the end of the second 9 years, to have not less than 5 oppida,50
families living in one neighborhood and small Temple of
IuppiterPerunus(6x12 meters) plus altars of Mars, Quirinus, Iuno and
Minerva built;
- uti alteris IX annis exactis oppida non minus quam V condantur, L
familiae in vicinitate vivant, aedes parva Iovis Peruni non minor VI
XII metris, arae Marti, Quirino, Iunoni, Minervae construantur;
- by the end of the third 9 years, to have not less than 15 oppida,500
families living in one neighborhood and the Temple of Iuppiter Perunusof
size not less than original Temple of Iuppiter Capitolinus in Ancient
Rome.
- uti tertiis IX annis exactis oppida non minus quam XV condantur, D
familiae in vicinitate vivant, aedes Iovis Peruni non minor templo Iovis
Capitolini Romae antiquo.
For this I ask Immortal Gods, and Iuppiter Optimus Maximus in the
firstplace, to grant me Their blessings and all the necessary will,
wisdom and strenght.
Harum rerum ergo Deos Immortales in primis Iovem Optimum Maximum precor,
uti sint mihi volentes propitii et voluntatem, sapientiam, fortitudinem
necessariam mihi tribuant.
By this Votum I do swear that I will never break this oath and I
willnever let to do this to anyone and all who are now taking this same
oath with me.
Hoc voto ius iurandum do me numquam hoc votum neglecturum, neminique
eorum qui in eadem verba mecum iuraverunt aut aliorum concessurum, ut
hoc neglegat.
If I should ever fail to fulfil this Votum I shall consecrate to the
Godsof the Underworld my immortal soul and fortune of my kin up to the
seventh generation to come.
Si sciens fefellero votumque solvere non potuero, animam meam immortalem
ac fortunam familiae meae usque ad generationem septimam Inferis
consecrabo.
In this I, M.Octavius Corvus, I, T. Iunius Brutus, I, Ap. Furius Lupus,
do swear.
In haec verba ego, M.Octavius Corvus, ego, T. Iunius Brutus, ego, Ap.
Furius Lupus ius iurandum do.
*****
Photos from FERAE SARMATIAE can be found here:
http://picasaweb.google.ru/m.octavius.corvus/FERIAEPROVSARMATIAEII#
<http://picasaweb.google.ru/m.octavius.corvus/FERIAEPROVSARMATIAEII#>
Special thanks for Tiberius Claudius Drusus and his Bulgarian coleagues
for his significant help in preparing the wedding ritual.
NOTICE: All three wedding conducted in Sarmatia by confarreatio ritual,
rites of consecration and making an Oath were REAL RITES and not any
kind of reenactment events.


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79395 From: Cato Date: 2010-08-16
Subject: a.d. XVII Kal. Sept.
Cato omnibus in foro SPD

Hodie est ante diem XVII Kalendas Septembris; haec dies comitialis est.

"Zeus, king of gods, made Metis his first wife,/she who knows most of
gods and mortal men./But when she was about to bear the owl-eyed
(glaukopin)/goddess Athena, then he deceived her mind with a trick of
wily words, and put her down in his belly,/by the advice of Gaia
(Earth) and starry Ouranos (Sky). Thus they advised him, so that no
other of the eternal/gods would hold the office of king but Zeus. For
from her wise children were fated to be born:/first a daughter,
owl-eyed Tritogeneia, like her father in strength and wise
counsel,/but then she was going to bear a son proud of heart, king of
gods and men;/but first Zeus put her into his own belly, so that the
goddess might advise him on good and evil." - Hesiod, Theogony 886-900

"Zeus had intercourse with Metis, although she changed into many
shapes to avoid making love with him. While she was pregnant Zeus
swallowed her up, for Earth said that after she bore the daughter she
was now carrying she would produce a son who would be ruler over
heaven. Fearing this, he swallowed her. Prometheus or as some say,
Hephaestus struck Zeus' head with an axe when the time came for her to
give birth and Athena leaped from it in full armor at the river
Triton." - Apollodorus, The Library 3.6

"And they that held Athens, the well-built citadel, the land of
great-hearted Erechtheus, whom of old Athene, daughter of Zeus,
fostered, when the earth, the giver of grain, had borne him; and she
made him to dwell in Athens, in her own rich sanctuary, and
there the youths of the Athenians, as the years roll on in their
courses, seek to win his favor with sacrifices of bulls and rams..."
- Homer, Iliad 2.546-551

"Of Pallas Athena, guardian of the city, I begin to sing. Dread is
she, and with Ares she loves the deeds of war, the sack of cities and
the shouting and the battle. It is she who saves the people as they go
to war and come back. Hail, goddess, and give us good fortune and
happiness!" - Homeric Hymn 11 to Athena

"I begin to sing of Pallas Athena, the glorious goddess, bright-eyed,
inventive, unbending of heart, pure virgin, saviour of cities,
courageous, Tritogeneia (Of Trito Born). From his awful head wise Zeus
himself bare her arrayed in warlike arms of flashing gold, and awe
seized all the gods as they gazed. But Athena sprang quickly from the
immortal head and stood before Zeus who holds the aegis, shaking a
sharp spear: great Olympos began to reel horribly at the might of the
grey-eyed goddess, and earth round about cried fearfully, and the sea
was moved and tossed with dark waves, while foam burst forth suddenly:
the bright Son of Hyperion [the Sun] stopped his swift-footed horses a
long while, until the maiden Pallas Athena had stripped the heavenly
armour from her immortal shoulders. And wise Zeus was glad. Hail to
you, daughter of Zeus who holds the aegis!" - Homeric Hymn 29 to Athena

"Only-begotten, noble race of Zeus, blessed and fierce, who joyest in
caves to rove: O warlike Pallas, whose illustrious kind, ineffable,
and effable we find: magnanimous and famed, the rocky height, and
groves, and shady mountains thee delight: in arms rejoicing, who with
furies dire and wild the souls of mortals dost inspire. Gymnastic
virgin of terrific mind, dire Gorgon's bane, unmarried, blessed, kind:
mother of arts, impetuous; understood as fury by the bad, but wisdom
by the good. Female and male, the arts of war are thine, O
much-formed, Drakaina, inspired divine: over the Phlegraion Gigantes,
roused to ire, thy coursers driving with destructive dire.
Tritogeneia, of splendid mien, purger of evils, all-victorious queen.
Hear me, O Goddess, when to thee I pray, with supplicating voice both
night and day, and in my latest hour give peace and health, propitious
times, and necessary wealth, and ever present be thy votaries aid, O
much implored, art's parent, blue-eyed maid." - Orphic Hymn 32 to Athena

Today marks the last day of the Panathenaic Games held in ancient
Greece. The Panathenaic Games were a set of games held every four
years in Athens, and were actually part of a much larger religious
festival, the Panathenaia, which was held every year. Every fourth
year when the games were also held, the festival was known as the
"Great Panathenaia," and was 3 or 4 days longer than the regular
festival. They were the most prestigious games for the citizens of
Athens, but they were not as important as the Olympic Games or the
other Panhellenic Games.

The first Great Panathenaia was organized by Pisistratus in 566 BC,
and was modelled on the Olympic Games. Pisistratus also added music
and poetry competitions, which were part of the Pythian Games but not
the Olympics. The games were divided into games for Athenians only,
and games for Athenians and any other Greeks who wanted to
participate. The games for all Greeks were essentially the same as the
Olympics, with boxing, wrestling, pankration, pentathlon, and chariot
racing, but chariot racing was the most prestigious of these, unlike
the Olympics where the stadion (foot race) was more important. The
winner of the chariot race received as a prize 140 "Panathenaic
Amphorae" full of olive oil.

The games in which only the Athenians were allowed to participate were
somewhat different. These included a torch race to the Parthenon (the
ancestor of the modern Olympic torch relay that takes place prior to
the Games), mock infantry and cavalry battles, a javelin throw on
horseback, the apobatai (a chariot race in which the driver had to
jump out of the chariot, run alongside, and jump back in), the
pyrriche (apparently military exercises accompanied by music), and the
euandrion (essentially a beauty contest among the athletes). In later
years there was also a rowing competition.

The Panathenaea also included poetic and musical competitions. Prizes
were awarded for rhapsodic recitation of Homeric poetry, for
instrumental music on the aulos (double oboe) and kithara (lyre), and
for singing to the accompaniment of the aulos (aulody) and kithara
(citharody).

The procession to the Parthenon was, however, more important than the
games themselves. During the Great Panathenaia (but not the regular
Panathenaia held every year), a special robe (the peplos) was made by
the women of Athens for the statue of Athena, which was carried to the
Parthenon as part of the procession. There was also a large sacrifice
made to Athena, the hekatombe ("sacrifice of a hundred oxen") and the
meat from the sacrificed animals was used in an enormous banquet on
the final night of the festival, the pannychis ("all-nighter").

Valete bene!

Cato
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79396 From: marcushoratius Date: 2010-08-16
Subject: a. d. XVII Kalendas Septembras: Papirius and the Pullarius
M. Moravius Piscinus Horatianus Pontifex Maximus Quiritibus, cultoribus Deorum, Quiritibus et omnibus salute plurimam dicit: Tum nos faciat quod volt Portunus!

Hodie est ante diem XVII Kalendas Septembras; haec dies comitialis est:

"If showers prevail at the setting of the Dolphin, they will not cease so long as while Arcturus remains visible." ~ G. Plinius Secundus, Historia Naturalis 18.74


AUC 460 / 293 BCE: Papirius and the Pullarius

"After receiving the reply from his colleague, Papirius rose quietly in the third watch of the night and sent a pullarius to observe the omens. There was not a man, whatever his rank or condition, in the camp who was not seized by the passion for battle, the highest and lowest alike were eagerly looking forward to it; the general was watching the excited looks of the men, the men were looking at their general, the universal excitement extended even to those who were engaged in observing the sacred birds. The chickens refused to eat, but the pullarius ventured to misrepresent matters, and reported to the consul that they had eaten so greedily that the corn dropped from their mouths on to the ground. The consul, delighted at the news, gave out that the omens could not have been more favourable; they were going to engage the enemy under the guidance and blessing of heaven. . .

"While the consul was busy with these arrangements an altercation began between the pullarii about the omens which had been observed in the morning. Some of the Roman cavalry overheard it and thought it of sufficient importance to justify them in reporting to Spurius Papirius, the consul's nephew, that the omens were being called in question. This young man, born in an age when men were not yet taught to despise the Gods, inquired into the matter in order to make quite sure that what he was reporting was true and then laid it before the consul. He thanked him for the trouble he had taken and bade him have no fears. "But," he continued, "if the man who is watching the omens makes a false report, he brings down the divine wrath on his own head. As far as I am concerned, I have received the formal intimation that the chickens ate eagerly, there could be no more favourable omen for the Roman people and army." He then issued instructions to the centurions to place the pullarius in front of the fighting line. The standards of the Samnites were now advancing, followed by the army in gorgeous array; even to their enemies they presented a magnificent sight. Before the battle-shout was raised or the lines closed a chance javelin struck the pullarius and he fell in front of the standards. When this was reported to the consul he remarked, "The Gods are taking their part in the battle, the guilty man has met with his punishment." ~ T. Livius 10.40


Early use of Statues in Italy

"Various circumstances prove, that the art of making statues was commonly practised in Italy at an early period. The statue in the Forum Boarium is said to have been consecrated to Hercules by Evander; it is called the triumphal Hercules, and, on the occasion of triumphal processions, is arrayed in triumphal vestments. And then besides, King Numa dedicated the statue of the two-faced Janus; a deity who is worshipped as presiding over both peace and war. The fingers, too, are so formed as to indicate three hundred and sixty-five days, or in other words, the year; thus denoting that he is the god of time and duration.

"There are also Etruscan statues dispersed in various parts of the world, which beyond a doubt were originally made in Etruria. I should have supposed that these had been the statues only of divinities, had not Metrodorus of Scepsis, who had his surname from his hatred to the Roman name, reproached us with having pillaged the city of Volsinii for the sake of the two thousand statues which it contained. It appears to me a singular fact. that although the origin of statues was of such great antiquity in Italy, the images of the gods, which were consecrated to them in their temples, should have been formed either of wood or of earthenware, until the conquest of Asia, which introduced luxury among us. It will be the best plan to enlarge upon the origin of the art of expressing likenesses, when we come to speak of what the Greeks call 'plastice;' for the art of modelling was prior to that of statuary." ~ G. Plinius Secundus, Historia Naturalis 34.16

Statue of Cato the Elder

"Seeing that statues were being set up in honour of many men, he said, 'As for myself, I had rather that men should ask why there is not a statue of Cato than why there is.'" ~ Plutarch, Sayings of Cato the Elder 10


Patratus of the Fetiales

"Why, among those called Fetiales, or, as we should say in Greek, peace-makers or treaty-bringers, was he who was called pater patratus considered the chief? The pater patratus is a man whose father is still alive and who has children; even now he possesses a certain preferment and confidence, for the praetors entrust to him any wards whose beauty and youth require a careful and discreet guardianship. Is it because there attaches to these men respect for their children and reverence for their fathers? Or does the name suggest the reason? For patratus means, as it were, 'completed' or 'perfected,' since he to whose lot it has fallen cto become a father while he still has a father is more perfect than other men. Or should the man who presides over oaths and treaties of peace be, in the words of Homer, 'one looking before and after?' Such a man above all others would be he that has a son to plan for and a father to plan with." ~ Plutarch, Roman Questions 62


Today's thought is from Sextus, Select Sentences 93:

"It is not possible for a man to live conformable to divinity, unless he acts modestly, well, and justly."
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79397 From: Publius Memmius Albucius Date: 2010-08-16
Subject: Senate/Board - intent to convene it
Senatores, omnesque



In due application of our law, I intend convening the Senate (aka Board of NR Inc.) in this second half of August.



The agenda will be defined later, but will focus mainly on the legal questions raised during the last weeks, and the necessary work to re-start on the By-laws or any alternate solution that the Senate/Board will decide to choose.





Valete Patres et omnes,







Albucius cos.


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79398 From: Cato Date: 2010-08-16
Subject: Correction of Calendrical Formula
Cato Piscino sal.

You persist in using an incorrect form, Piscinus.

While consistency is a generally admirable trait, a determined choice to remain in error is not simply foolish but in this instance detrimental to the public face of the Respublica.

The month is "Septembris", NOT "Septembras", and the proper declension is "Septembris".

Vale,

Cato



--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "marcushoratius" <MHoratius@...> wrote:
>

> Hodie est ante diem XVII Kalendas Septembras; haec dies comitialis est:
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79399 From: M·CVR·COMPLVTENSIS Date: 2010-08-16
Subject: Re: Correction of Calendrical Formula
As the month of April are, mutatis mutandis, the months of June, September
and November. To do this properly we will consider:


1. Do not mislead the month that we are computing and always take into
account the following month in which we are forming.
2. The decline to which belongs each adjective: 3rd declension (�prilis,
September, October, November and December) and 1st decline (Ianuarius-a-um,
Februarius-a-um, Martius-ia-ium, Maius-ia-ium, Iunius-ia-ium,
Julius-a-um, Augustus-a-um).
3. Exchanging the first declension endings and the third decline in the
ablative and accusative plural cases:
- The termination of ablative plural in-ibus who take the words of the
3rd is replaced by the termination -is of the ablative plural of
the 1st and
vice versa.
- The termination of the accusative plural in-is typical of the words
of the 3rd declension is replaced by the termination -as of the
accusative
plural of the 1st decline and vice versa.


1. KALENDIS APRILIBVS
2. POSTRIDIE KALENDAS APRILES
3. ANTE DIEM III NONAS APRILES
4. PRIDIE NONAS APRILES
5. NONIS APRILIBVS
6. POSTRIDIE NONAS APRILES
7. ANTE DIEM VII IDVS APRILES
8. ANTE DIEM VI IDVS APRILES
9. ANTE DIEM V IDVS APRILES
10. ANTE DIEM IV IDVS APRILES
11. ANTE DIEM III IDVS APRILES
12. PRIDIE IDVS APRILES
13. IDIBVS APRILIBVS
14. POSTRIDIE IDVS APRILES
15. ANTE DIEM XVII KALENDAS MAIAS
16. ANTE DIEM XVI KALENDAS MAIAS
17. ANTE DIEM XV KALENDAS MAIAS
18. ANTE DIEM XIV KALENDAS MAIAS
19. ANTE DIEM XIII KALENDAS MAIAS
20. ANTE DIEM XII KALENDAS MAIAS
21. ANTE DIEM XI KALENDAS MAIAS
22. ANTE DIEM X KALENDAS MAIAS
23. ANTE DIEM IX KALENDAS MAIAS
24. ANTE DIEM VIII KALENDAS MAIAS
25. ANTE DIEM VII KALENDAS MAIAS
26. ANTE DIEM VI KALENDAS MAIAS
27. ANTE DIEM V KALENDAS MAIAS
28. ANTE DIEM IV KALENDAS MAIAS
29. ANTE DIEM III KALENDAS MAIAS
30. PRIDIE KALENDAS MAIAS.



M�CVRIATIVS�COMPLVTENSIS
PROCONSVL HISPANIAE

NOVA ROMA

-------------------------------------------

ex paucis multa, ex minimis maxima


2010/8/16 Cato <catoinnyc@...>

>
>
> Cato Piscino sal.
>
> You persist in using an incorrect form, Piscinus.
>
> While consistency is a generally admirable trait, a determined choice to
> remain in error is not simply foolish but in this instance detrimental to
> the public face of the Respublica.
>
> The month is "Septembris", NOT "Septembras", and the proper declension is
> "Septembris".
>
> Vale,
>
> Cato
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com <Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com>,
> "marcushoratius" <MHoratius@...> wrote:
> >
>
> > Hodie est ante diem XVII Kalendas Septembras; haec dies comitialis est:
>
>
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79400 From: James Hooper Date: 2010-08-16
Subject: Re: Latin classes: last call for Grammatica Latina
Gratia,
Have accounts at Amazon and Barnes and Noble, should be no problem.
Vale,


On Sun, 15 Aug 2010 22:53:40 -0400
"A. Tullia Scholastica" <fororom@...> wrote:
>>
>>
>> A. Tullia Scholastica C. Pompeio Marcello S.P.D.
>>
>>
>> Salve Domina,
>> Not sure I will do very good, but I will give it a try.
>>
>>
>> ATS: That¹s all anyone can do. Please arm yourself with the text
>> (Wheelock or Assimil) and let me know when you have it. The Wheelock text
>>is
>> not terribly expensive and is readily available in English-speaking
>>countries,
>> though the Assimil one is neither easy to obtain nor cheap. It is, however,
>> quite good, though the newer version of Assimil is horrid. If all else
>>fails,
>> too, Wheelock has self-teaching exercises and answers in the back of the
>>book
>> which will help with further learning. There are good reasons why this text
>> is so popular, and this is one of them.
>>
>> Vale,
>> Gaius Pompeius Marcellus
>>
>>
>> Vale, et valete.
>>
>>
>> On Sun, 15 Aug 2010 16:19:27 -0400
>> "A. Tullia Scholastica" <flavia@... <mailto:flavia%40localnet.com>
>>>
>> wrote:
>>> > A. Tullia Scholastica quiritibus tironibus sociis peregrinisque bonae
>>> > voluntatis S.P.D.
>>> >
>>> > Time is getting short to register for our Grammatica Latina classes in
>>> > particular, for Grammatica I will begin on Monday, September 6th, the US
>>> > Labor Day holiday (though students need not appear until the following
>>> day),
>>> > and Grammatica II will begin in just two short weeks, on Monday, August
>>> > 30th.
>>> >
>>> > The text for the Grammatica classes is Wheelock¹s Latin, by Frederic
>>> > Wheelock, sixth edition, revised by LaFleur. This is readily available in
>>> > US college bookstores belonging to institutions which teach Latin as it is
>>> > very popular and is used in most such institutions of higher education,
>>> > though some prefer another text. It may also be ordered via the Wheelock
>>> > website <http://www.wheelockslatin.com>
>>> >
>>> > As previously noted, the first semester of Grammatica Latina I covers
>>> > the first 11 lessons of this text, and the separate second semester course
>>> > covers the next 11 lessons. After the first week of the first semester,
>>> > during which three preliminary lessons are presented, a lesson from the
>>> text
>>> > is presented every Monday, and written homework is assigned in order to
>>> > solidify the concepts presented in the text. A similar program is
>>>observed
>>> > in the second semester course. In the intermediate level Grammatica II,
>>>we
>>> > now cover lessons 23-34 in the newly-separated first semester course, and
>>> > address the remaining lessons in the second semester course (lessons
>>> 35-40),
>>> > followed by readings from the text and other sources. We shall meet
>>>Caesar
>>> > and Cicero and Pliny and Horace and Catullus there, inter alios, and will
>>> > also learn some spoken Latin and possibly engage in activities such as are
>>> > conducted at the Latin-immersion conventicula.
>>> >
>>> > As for the Sermo Latinus courses, which begin somewhat later to
>>> > accommodate the now-vacationing Europeans, we cover lessons 1-56 of the
>>> > Desessard Assimil text in the separate Sermo I course, and lessons 57-101
>>> in
>>> > the separate Sermo II one, while all 101 lessons are covered in the
>>> Combined
>>> > Sermo Latinus I & II course. The text for all of these is Le Latin Sans
>>> > Peine, by Clement Desessard. The text is also available in Italian; I
>>> > believe that the title is Il Latino senza Sforzo. Those who cannot read
>>> > either French or Italian should not worry; we have translated the text
>>>into
>>> > both English and Spanish for the benefit of our students, and reveal these
>>> > translations along with each lesson. The French version of the text has
>>> > gone out of print, but can be obtained online either by purchase of a used
>>> > copy or by file-sharing.
>>> > Sermo I & II Combined will begin September 13th, and the separate Sermo I
>>> > and Sermo II will begin a week later, on Monday, September 20th.
>>> >
>>> > All of our Latin classes require effort on the part of the student, but
>>> > the benefits are great. Cultores should learn just what those prayers
>>> > actually say, and everyone should be able to pick up a Latin text and make
>>> > some sense out of it, if not read and understand it (though that should
>>> come
>>> > after a couple of years of Latin, though not just one year, except in the
>>> > Combined course). The Grammatica courses are taught by the traditional
>>> > method for the most part, and require memorization of vocabulary and
>>> > paradigms, inter alia; the Assimil Sermo courses are taught by a more
>>> > natural method, and work better for some students. The main focus of
>>> > Grammatica is learning to read Latin (though we do more than that), and
>>> that
>>> > of Sermo is learning to write and speak in Latin, though obviously reading
>>> > is not neglected. I strongly encourage everyone to make the effort to
>>> learn
>>> > the language of the Romans, which, although having a grammar complex by
>>>the
>>> > standards of English, has a small vocabulary as languages go, and that
>>> > grammar is quite regular. Quite honestly, if more of you do not enter our
>>> > classes and complete them, we shall stop offering them, or reduce their
>>> > frequency. I have moved all completing students who wished to continue
>>> into
>>> > the intermediate courses, but every year fewer and fewer students want to
>>> > take Grammatica I, and this year we have very few in the Combined class
>>>and
>>> > in Sermo I. The Sermo classes are unique in the world, and everyone
>>>should
>>> > take advantage of them while we can still offer them. A basic knowledge
>>>of
>>> > Latin is helpful, but not essential. The pace is brisk, but the textbook
>>> > lessons are short, with grammar addressed only every seventh lesson.
>>> Please
>>> > consider taking these courses; there may still be time to obtain the
>>> > Desessard text.
>>> >
>>> > Valete.
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>>> >
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79401 From: rory12001 Date: 2010-08-16
Subject: Re: Correction of Calendrical Formula
Scholastica's grammatica class still has room; I'd sign up without delay.
Castor that was funny!
vale
Maior

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Cato" <catoinnyc@...> wrote:
>
> Cato Piscino sal.
>
> You persist in using an incorrect form, Piscinus.
>
> While consistency is a generally admirable trait, a determined choice to remain in error is not simply foolish but in this instance detrimental to the public face of the Respublica.
>
> The month is "Septembris", NOT "Septembras", and the proper declension is "Septembris".
>
> Vale,
>
> Cato
>
>
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "marcushoratius" <MHoratius@> wrote:
> >
>
> > Hodie est ante diem XVII Kalendas Septembras; haec dies comitialis est:
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79402 From: rory12001 Date: 2010-08-16
Subject: Re: Avitus' protreptic to Nova Roma
oops, gratias, lol..bildungsroman too but there are longer words.
vale
Maior

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "gualterus_graecus" <waltms1@...> wrote:
>
> Salve,
>
> "Deutsch" and "Weltanschauung".
>
> Vale,
>
> GG
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "rory12001" <rory12001@> wrote:
> >
> >
> > M.Hortensia Major A. Tulliae Scholasticae spd;
> > Deutche isn't so easy, what with those quirky separable prefixes, and long long word; can you say weltanschung;-)
> >
> > Catalani non sunt hispanice loquentes (istas odere); ergo nonne latinam linguam discent?
> > valeas
> > Maior
> >
> > -
> > > >
> > > > ATS: Yahoo doesn¹t want us to use those short Anglo-Saxon words
> > > > here...and REAL Anglo-Saxon was equipped with the full armory of the Germanic
> > > > languages: der Wörter, ein Wörter, irregular declensions, the whole schmear.
> > > > My guess is that a lot of the words were anything BUT short. German ones
> > > > certainly can grow quite nicely.
> > > >
> > > > I treasured the day Avitus critiqued my protasis; I thought: 'I've never
> > > > received such an erudite insult in my life!'
> > > >
> > > > ATS: LOL! With him you will definitely get erudite...and multi-lingual!
> > > > Cras Barcinonem discedet, ergo parum audiemus.
> > > >
> > > > Vivat Latinitas
> > > >
> > > > ATS: Rectissimé!
> > > >
> > > > M. Hortensia maior
> > > >
> > > > Valete!
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Please find below a multilingual protreptic for Latin
> > > >> >
> > > >> > "Multilingual protreptic"?
> > > >> >
> > > >> > Sweet Merciful Bloodstained Gods, woman. No wonder you're scaring off
> > > >> > the potential students.
> > > >> >
> > > >> > Vedius, the plain-spoken
> > > >> >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> > >
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79403 From: petronius_dexter Date: 2010-08-16
Subject: Re: a. d. XVIII Kalendas Septembras: Romulus and the Curiones
Dexter Catoni s.p.d.,

> The correctly-declined name of the month is "Septembris", not "Septembras";

Here you have the choice between Septembris (Genitive case, with mensis understood) or Septembres (accusative case as adjective of Kalendas, also in the accusative).
The most classical is to use the accusative:
Kalendas Martias, Kalendas Septembres... but "Septembras" is not correct.

when it is just the day, you must use the ablative:
Kalendis Septembribus, Kalendis Martiis... it is the same with Idus and Nonas.

> you make this same mistake with the name of practically every month. And today is a dies fastus, not comitialis:
> Hodiernus dies est ante diem XVIII Kalendas Septembris; haec dies fastus est.

No *haec* but *hic*. Hic dies fastus est or Haec dies fasta est.

Indeed "dies" is both feminine and masculine. But hic is masculine as fastus and haec is feminine as festa.

Feminine in the famous Mozart Requiem:
Dies irae, dies *illa*
Masculine, in the calendar:
Dies *Fastus*, dies *Nefastus*...

Optime vale.

C. Petronius Dexter
Arcoiali scribebat
a. d. XVII Kalendas Septembres P. Memmio K. Fabio II coss.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79404 From: Cato Date: 2010-08-16
Subject: Re: a. d. XVIII Kalendas Septembras: Romulus and the Curiones
Cato Dextero sal.

Then it is also "hic dies comitialis est"?

Vale,

Cato

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "petronius_dexter" <jfarnoud94@...> wrote:
>
> Dexter Catoni s.p.d.,
>
> > The correctly-declined name of the month is "Septembris", not "Septembras";
>
> Here you have the choice between Septembris (Genitive case, with mensis understood) or Septembres (accusative case as adjective of Kalendas, also in the accusative).
> The most classical is to use the accusative:
> Kalendas Martias, Kalendas Septembres... but "Septembras" is not correct.
>
> when it is just the day, you must use the ablative:
> Kalendis Septembribus, Kalendis Martiis... it is the same with Idus and Nonas.
>
> > you make this same mistake with the name of practically every month. And today is a dies fastus, not comitialis:
> > Hodiernus dies est ante diem XVIII Kalendas Septembris; haec dies fastus est.
>
> No *haec* but *hic*. Hic dies fastus est or Haec dies fasta est.
>
> Indeed "dies" is both feminine and masculine. But hic is masculine as fastus and haec is feminine as festa.
>
> Feminine in the famous Mozart Requiem:
> Dies irae, dies *illa*
> Masculine, in the calendar:
> Dies *Fastus*, dies *Nefastus*...
>
> Optime vale.
>
> C. Petronius Dexter
> Arcoiali scribebat
> a. d. XVII Kalendas Septembres P. Memmio K. Fabio II coss.
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79405 From: petronius_dexter Date: 2010-08-16
Subject: Re: a. d. XVIII Kalendas Septembras: Romulus and the Curiones
Dexter Catoni s.p.d.,

> Then it is also "hic dies comitialis est"?

Here you can have both:

Hic dies comitialis est
Haec dies comitialis est.

Because comitialis is an adjective of the 3rd declension and has the same forms in masculine and feminine gender, only the neuter is different.
Comitialis (masculine and feminine), comitiale (neuter).

Optime vale.

C. Petronius Dexter
Arcoiali scribebat
a. d. XVII Kalendas Septembres P. Memmio K. Fabio II coss.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79406 From: fauxrari Date: 2010-08-16
Subject: Wedding photos! At last!
Salve, amici!

At last, I have some photos from my wedding on 7/30. Everything was done with a Roman touch. It was a modernization of a conferatio ritual. I consecrated the altar beforehand and we had most of the required religious personnel, althoug it was nothing compared to what our Pontifix Maximus has done. I did my best. I had to rectify my own faith in the Religio Romana so as not to insult my Christian relatives. I made sure to make my sacrifices and prayers on my own though, so I was happy.

Here are some photos that my friends took at the wedding...

http://www.facebook.com/home.php?#!/profile.php?id=100001362391300&v=photos

We had a great time. I love my Brutus!

L. Antonia Auriga
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79407 From: aerdensrw Date: 2010-08-16
Subject: Re: Latin classes: last call for Grammatica Latina
P. Corva Gaudialis A. Tulliae Scholasticae sal.

Salve!

How do I register for this? Is it offered through the Academia Thules?

Paulla

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "A. Tullia Scholastica" <flavia@...> wrote:
>
> A. Tullia Scholastica quiritibus tironibus sociis peregrinisque bonae
> voluntatis S.P.D.
>
> Time is getting short to register for our Grammatica Latina classes in
> particular, for Grammatica I will begin on Monday, September 6th,

(snipped)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79408 From: C.Maria Caeca Date: 2010-08-16
Subject: Re: Latin classes: last call for Grammatica Latina
Caeca Gaudialis (um?) sal,

wonderful! See you in class!

Vale quam optime,
Caeca

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79409 From: luciaiuliaaquila Date: 2010-08-16
Subject: Re: Wedding photos! At last!
Salve Antonia!

Congratulations!

Vale optime,

Julia

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "fauxrari" <drivergirl@...> wrote:
>
> Salve, amici!
>
> At last, I have some photos from my wedding on 7/30. Everything was done with a Roman touch. It was a modernization of a conferatio ritual. I consecrated the altar beforehand and we had most of the required religious personnel, althoug it was nothing compared to what our Pontifix Maximus has done. I did my best. I had to rectify my own faith in the Religio Romana so as not to insult my Christian relatives. I made sure to make my sacrifices and prayers on my own though, so I was happy.
>
> Here are some photos that my friends took at the wedding...
>
> http://www.facebook.com/home.php?#!/profile.php?id=100001362391300&v=photos
>
> We had a great time. I love my Brutus!
>
> L. Antonia Auriga
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79410 From: luciaiuliaaquila Date: 2010-08-16
Subject: Re: FERIAE PROV. SARMATIAE NOVAE ROMANAE II
Salve Corvus Amice,

I also just looked at the newest photos added today! They are magnificent.
May i have your permission to share them at the next meeting at Aedes Venus Genetrix here in Nashville? They are so informative in addition to being so beautiful!
Thank for this gift and congratulations!

Cura ut valeas,

Julia

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "mcorvvs" <mcorvvs@...> wrote:
>
> From Kal. Sex. till a.d. VII Id. Sex. (August 1 - 7th) Second Novaroman
> Sarmatian provincial festival FERIAE SARMATIAE was held in
> Poltava.Program was:- Kal. Sex. - Immolatio;- a.d. IV Non. Sex. -
> Sacrifice at the Holy Oaks (Dykanka, 25 km from Poltava);- pr. Non. Sex.
> - Wedding ceremony by confarreatio for three couples conducted by
> Pontifex Cn. Cornelius Lentulus and Sacerdos Iovis M. Octavius Corvus.-
> a.d. VII Id. Sex. - Rite of VOTVM SARMATARVM. See the full text below.
> - Rite of Consecration Augur M. Lucretius Agricola performed by Pontifex
> Cn. Cornelius Lentulus. - Rite of consecrating the
> Templum for building the Aedes of Iuppiter, performed by Pontifex Cn.
> Cornelius Lentulus, Augur M. Lucretius Agricola and Sacerdos Iovis M.
> Octavius Corvus.
> FULL TEXT OF SARMATIAN VOTUM
> Here, at the Altar of Iuppiter Perunus in Poltava, in the province
> ofSarmatia of Nova Roma, I, M.Octavius Corvus, I, T. Iunius Brutus, I,
> Ap. Furius Lupus, do give this Votum and swear to fulfilthe following:
> Hic apud aram Iovis Peruni Poltavae in provincia Sarmatia Nova Romana,
> ego, M.Octavius Corvus, ego, T. Iunius Brutus, ego, Ap. Furius Lupus,
> hoc votum facio et in haec verba iuro me facturum:
> - by the end of the first 9 years, starting from this day, to have
> notless than 3 oppida in Sarmatia, 10 families living in one
> neighborhood and small Temple of IuppiterPerunus(6x12 meters) built;
> - uti primis IX annis exactis hocce die inceptis oppida non minus quam
> III in Sarmatia condantur, X familiae in vicinitate vivant, aedesque
> parva Iovis Peruni non minor VI XII metris construatur;
> - by the end of the second 9 years, to have not less than 5 oppida,50
> families living in one neighborhood and small Temple of
> IuppiterPerunus(6x12 meters) plus altars of Mars, Quirinus, Iuno and
> Minerva built;
> - uti alteris IX annis exactis oppida non minus quam V condantur, L
> familiae in vicinitate vivant, aedes parva Iovis Peruni non minor VI
> XII metris, arae Marti, Quirino, Iunoni, Minervae construantur;
> - by the end of the third 9 years, to have not less than 15 oppida,500
> families living in one neighborhood and the Temple of Iuppiter Perunusof
> size not less than original Temple of Iuppiter Capitolinus in Ancient
> Rome.
> - uti tertiis IX annis exactis oppida non minus quam XV condantur, D
> familiae in vicinitate vivant, aedes Iovis Peruni non minor templo Iovis
> Capitolini Romae antiquo.
> For this I ask Immortal Gods, and Iuppiter Optimus Maximus in the
> firstplace, to grant me Their blessings and all the necessary will,
> wisdom and strenght.
> Harum rerum ergo Deos Immortales in primis Iovem Optimum Maximum precor,
> uti sint mihi volentes propitii et voluntatem, sapientiam, fortitudinem
> necessariam mihi tribuant.
> By this Votum I do swear that I will never break this oath and I
> willnever let to do this to anyone and all who are now taking this same
> oath with me.
> Hoc voto ius iurandum do me numquam hoc votum neglecturum, neminique
> eorum qui in eadem verba mecum iuraverunt aut aliorum concessurum, ut
> hoc neglegat.
> If I should ever fail to fulfil this Votum I shall consecrate to the
> Godsof the Underworld my immortal soul and fortune of my kin up to the
> seventh generation to come.
> Si sciens fefellero votumque solvere non potuero, animam meam immortalem
> ac fortunam familiae meae usque ad generationem septimam Inferis
> consecrabo.
> In this I, M.Octavius Corvus, I, T. Iunius Brutus, I, Ap. Furius Lupus,
> do swear.
> In haec verba ego, M.Octavius Corvus, ego, T. Iunius Brutus, ego, Ap.
> Furius Lupus ius iurandum do.
> *****
> Photos from FERAE SARMATIAE can be found here:
> http://picasaweb.google.ru/m.octavius.corvus/FERIAEPROVSARMATIAEII#
> <http://picasaweb.google.ru/m.octavius.corvus/FERIAEPROVSARMATIAEII#>
> Special thanks for Tiberius Claudius Drusus and his Bulgarian coleagues
> for his significant help in preparing the wedding ritual.
> NOTICE: All three wedding conducted in Sarmatia by confarreatio ritual,
> rites of consecration and making an Oath were REAL RITES and not any
> kind of reenactment events.
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79411 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2010-08-16
Subject: Re: Latin classes: last call for Grammatica Latina
>
>
> A. Tullia Scholastica P. Corvae Gaudiali quiritibus, sociis, peregrinisque
> bonae voluntatis S.P.D.
>
>
> P. Corva Gaudialis A. Tulliae Scholasticae sal.
>
> Salve!
>
> How do I register for this?
>
> ATS: I will provide the information when you inform me that you have the
> textbook, and verify that with me. I have to check to make sure that the
> student actually has the text, for the homework is found only there.
>
>
> Is it offered through the Academia Thules?
>
> ATS: No, unfortunately the Academia Thules no longer exists. Their
> course server died in early November of 2008, and it has not been repaired or
> replaced.
>
> Paulla
>
> Vale, et valete.
>
>
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com <mailto:Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com> , "A.
> Tullia Scholastica" <flavia@...> wrote:
>> >
>> > A. Tullia Scholastica quiritibus tironibus sociis peregrinisque bonae
>> > voluntatis S.P.D.
>> >
>> > Time is getting short to register for our Grammatica Latina classes in
>> > particular, for Grammatica I will begin on Monday, September 6th,
>
> (snipped)
>
>
>




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79412 From: mcorvvs Date: 2010-08-17
Subject: Re: FERIAE PROV. SARMATIAE NOVAE ROMANAE II
Salve Aquilae,

sure you can! This is what it was actually made for! :) It will especially be pleasant for me since your meeting will be in Nashville, the city of Parthenon!
And many thanks for congratulations!

Optime vale,

CORVVS

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "luciaiuliaaquila" <luciaiuliaaquila@...> wrote:
>
> Salve Corvus Amice,
>
> I also just looked at the newest photos added today! They are magnificent.
> May i have your permission to share them at the next meeting at Aedes Venus Genetrix here in Nashville? They are so informative in addition to being so beautiful!
> Thank for this gift and congratulations!
>
> Cura ut valeas,
>
> Julia
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "mcorvvs" <mcorvvs@> wrote:
> >
> > From Kal. Sex. till a.d. VII Id. Sex. (August 1 - 7th) Second Novaroman
> > Sarmatian provincial festival FERIAE SARMATIAE was held in
> > Poltava.Program was:- Kal. Sex. - Immolatio;- a.d. IV Non. Sex. -
> > Sacrifice at the Holy Oaks (Dykanka, 25 km from Poltava);- pr. Non. Sex.
> > - Wedding ceremony by confarreatio for three couples conducted by
> > Pontifex Cn. Cornelius Lentulus and Sacerdos Iovis M. Octavius Corvus.-
> > a.d. VII Id. Sex. - Rite of VOTVM SARMATARVM. See the full text below.
> > - Rite of Consecration Augur M. Lucretius Agricola performed by Pontifex
> > Cn. Cornelius Lentulus. - Rite of consecrating the
> > Templum for building the Aedes of Iuppiter, performed by Pontifex Cn.
> > Cornelius Lentulus, Augur M. Lucretius Agricola and Sacerdos Iovis M.
> > Octavius Corvus.
> > FULL TEXT OF SARMATIAN VOTUM
> > Here, at the Altar of Iuppiter Perunus in Poltava, in the province
> > ofSarmatia of Nova Roma, I, M.Octavius Corvus, I, T. Iunius Brutus, I,
> > Ap. Furius Lupus, do give this Votum and swear to fulfilthe following:
> > Hic apud aram Iovis Peruni Poltavae in provincia Sarmatia Nova Romana,
> > ego, M.Octavius Corvus, ego, T. Iunius Brutus, ego, Ap. Furius Lupus,
> > hoc votum facio et in haec verba iuro me facturum:
> > - by the end of the first 9 years, starting from this day, to have
> > notless than 3 oppida in Sarmatia, 10 families living in one
> > neighborhood and small Temple of IuppiterPerunus(6x12 meters) built;
> > - uti primis IX annis exactis hocce die inceptis oppida non minus quam
> > III in Sarmatia condantur, X familiae in vicinitate vivant, aedesque
> > parva Iovis Peruni non minor VI XII metris construatur;
> > - by the end of the second 9 years, to have not less than 5 oppida,50
> > families living in one neighborhood and small Temple of
> > IuppiterPerunus(6x12 meters) plus altars of Mars, Quirinus, Iuno and
> > Minerva built;
> > - uti alteris IX annis exactis oppida non minus quam V condantur, L
> > familiae in vicinitate vivant, aedes parva Iovis Peruni non minor VI
> > XII metris, arae Marti, Quirino, Iunoni, Minervae construantur;
> > - by the end of the third 9 years, to have not less than 15 oppida,500
> > families living in one neighborhood and the Temple of Iuppiter Perunusof
> > size not less than original Temple of Iuppiter Capitolinus in Ancient
> > Rome.
> > - uti tertiis IX annis exactis oppida non minus quam XV condantur, D
> > familiae in vicinitate vivant, aedes Iovis Peruni non minor templo Iovis
> > Capitolini Romae antiquo.
> > For this I ask Immortal Gods, and Iuppiter Optimus Maximus in the
> > firstplace, to grant me Their blessings and all the necessary will,
> > wisdom and strenght.
> > Harum rerum ergo Deos Immortales in primis Iovem Optimum Maximum precor,
> > uti sint mihi volentes propitii et voluntatem, sapientiam, fortitudinem
> > necessariam mihi tribuant.
> > By this Votum I do swear that I will never break this oath and I
> > willnever let to do this to anyone and all who are now taking this same
> > oath with me.
> > Hoc voto ius iurandum do me numquam hoc votum neglecturum, neminique
> > eorum qui in eadem verba mecum iuraverunt aut aliorum concessurum, ut
> > hoc neglegat.
> > If I should ever fail to fulfil this Votum I shall consecrate to the
> > Godsof the Underworld my immortal soul and fortune of my kin up to the
> > seventh generation to come.
> > Si sciens fefellero votumque solvere non potuero, animam meam immortalem
> > ac fortunam familiae meae usque ad generationem septimam Inferis
> > consecrabo.
> > In this I, M.Octavius Corvus, I, T. Iunius Brutus, I, Ap. Furius Lupus,
> > do swear.
> > In haec verba ego, M.Octavius Corvus, ego, T. Iunius Brutus, ego, Ap.
> > Furius Lupus ius iurandum do.
> > *****
> > Photos from FERAE SARMATIAE can be found here:
> > http://picasaweb.google.ru/m.octavius.corvus/FERIAEPROVSARMATIAEII#
> > <http://picasaweb.google.ru/m.octavius.corvus/FERIAEPROVSARMATIAEII#>
> > Special thanks for Tiberius Claudius Drusus and his Bulgarian coleagues
> > for his significant help in preparing the wedding ritual.
> > NOTICE: All three wedding conducted in Sarmatia by confarreatio ritual,
> > rites of consecration and making an Oath were REAL RITES and not any
> > kind of reenactment events.
> >
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79413 From: Cato Date: 2010-08-17
Subject: a.d. XVI Kal. Sept.
Cato omnibus in foro SPD

Hodiernus dies est ante diem XVI Kalendas Septembris; hic dies nefastus publicus est.

"Portunalia dicta a Portuno, cui eo die aedes in portu Tiberino facta
et feriae institutae." - Varro, de Lingua Latina VI

Today is the ceebration of the Portunalia, in honor of the god
Portunes. Portunes (alternatively spelled Portumnes or Portunus) was
a god of keys and doors and livestock. He protected the warehouses
where grain was stored. Probably because of folk associations between
porta "gate, door" and portus "harbor", the "gateway" to the sea,
Portunus later became conflated with Palaemon and evolved into a god
primarily of ports and harbors. In the Latin adjective importunus his
name was applied to untimely waves and weather and contrary winds, and
the Latin echoes in English opportune and its old-fashioned antonym
importune, meaning "well-timed' and "badly-timed". Hence Portunus is
behind both an opportunity and importunate or badly-timed solicitations

The temple of Portunis was built at the port on the Tiber; this small
temple on the banks of the Tiber was dedicated to the Roman god of
rivers and seaports, Portunus. Originally this deity protected doors
("portus") but when the meaning of the word changed to harbor, his
guardian function also changed. It was built of tufa and travertine
blocks which had been originally been coated with a fine layer of
stucco. It is in a good state of preservation because it was converted
to a Christian church in the 9th century AD. Some sources also refer
to this as a Tiberinalia, or festival of the Tiber river, as Portunis
is the god of the Tiber. Portunis is also known as the god of keys, or
the opening of locked gates, while as Ianus he was the god of doors.
On this day old keys were burned in the hearth as a sacrificial offering.


"PORTUNUS: the protecting genius of harbours among the Romans. He was invoked to grant a happy return from a voyage. Hence a temple was erected to him at the port of the Tiber, from whence the road descended to the port of Ostia. At his temple an annual festival, the Portunalia, was celebrated on the 17th of August. (Varro, De Ling. Lat. vi. 19 ; Arnob. iii. 23; Cic. de Nat. Deor. ii. 26; Virg. Aen. v. 241.) He was represented with a key in his hand, portus as well as porta signifying a place which can be closed. At the time when the Romans became familiar with Greek mythology, Portunus was identified with the Greek Palaemon (Festus, s. v. Portunus, p. 242, ed. Muller)." - http://www.mythindex.com/roman-mythology/P/Portunus.html

Valete bene!

Cato
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79414 From: marcushoratius Date: 2010-08-17
Subject: a. d. XVI Kalendas Septembras: PORTUNALIA
M. Moravius Piscinus Pontifex Maximus, Quiritibus, cultoribus Deorum et omnibus salute plurimam dicit: Portunus felicitatem in nos impertiat

Hodie est ante diem XVI Kalendas Septembras; haec dies nefastus publica est:

"A lucky day to set the vine in the earth, and tame the steer, and fix lashes to the warp." ~ P. Vergilius Maro, Georgic 1.284-85


PORTUNALIA

"The Portunalia was named from Portunus, to whom, on this day, a temple was built at the port on the Tiber and a holiday instituted." ~ M. Terrentius Varro, Lingua Latinae 6.19

The Temple of Portunus, and His festival, were near the Pons Aemilius. It isn't clear where along the River Tiber this bridge was located. Mommsen pointed out that portus is never used to mean fishing wharfs along a riverbank, and thus assumes that the Pons Aemilius and the Temple of Portunus may have been at Ostia and that the festival included a procession from Rome to that temple site. Possibly, but then this would have been a later development. The fact that Portunus had a flamen points to an earlier introduction of the festival.

In the rather late version of the fasti, that of Philocalus, the Portunalia is instead called Tibernalia. Mommsen then assumed that Portunus was in fact Tiberus. However, an earlier name for the Tiber was Volturnus, who had His own flamen Volturnalis, and His own festival in August. There is, too, a scholia that suggests that the Portunalia included a rite whereby people tossed the keys to their houses into a fire, thus purifying them. This may point to an early Portunus who had nothing to do with ports and rivers but everything to do with the city gates. And in fact Verrius said that the image of Portunus carried a key in His hand to represent that He is the God of doors and gateways. Another indication of a possible connection between Portunus and Janus was that at some time in August the flamen Portunalis performed a rite whereby he anointed the spears of Quirinus with oil. This would appear to have been a rite of purification of a Roman legion as it returned from campaign. An army had to be purified before its soldiers were permitted to enter the City gates. In other words, although little is really known about Him what is known possibly points to Portunus having been a form of Janus. In particular, Portunus guarded the doors of grain wharehouses that were down by the river, warehouses that were especially important to the plebeians who supplied Portunus with His flamen. So we have, or seem to have, Portunus associated with ports, city gates, warehouse doors, and the keys of private homes and farms.

On this date, too, C. Duillius dedicated a Temple of Janus in the Theatrum Marcellum during the First Punic War (260 BCE). Later Emperor Tiberius rebuilt the temple and dedicated it on 18 Oct. This again possibly points to a connection between Janus and Portunus. With Janus there is a dichotomy between the God Who opens the day and Who is the Opener of the Way to the Gods, and Who opens the New Year, and then with the other Janus, His lesser form, Who was associated with the front door of houses and with city gates. Could, therefore, Portunus have been conflated with this lesser Janus? Was it then only the poets who drew this connection, as the sacerdotes and the plebeian culti Deorum maintained a separate cultus for Portunus?


Today we make offerings to Portunus to safeguard our houses, and toss our house keys into the flame to purify them so that they may better serve Portunus.


Janus

"Why do they suppose Janus to have borne two faces and so represent Him in painting and sculpture? Is it because, as they relate, He was by birth a Greek from Perrhaebia, and, when He had crossed to Italy and had settled among the savages there, He changed both His speech and His habits? Or is it rather because He changed the people of Italy to another manner and form of life by persuading a people which had formerly made use of wild plants and lawless customs to till the soil and to live under organized government?" ~ Plutarch, Roman Questions 22:


Ex Libri Pontifici

"Spurcum, is wine that it is not permitted to bring to sacrifices, according to Antistius Labeo in liber X of his Commentarii de iure pontificio, because it is mixed with water, or it is not yet new wine boiled down over a low flame, or else the must of the grape not yet cooled from fermentation." ~ GRF M. Antistius Labeo 2 [15]; Fest. s. v. spurcum


Today's thought comes from Lucius Annaeus Seneca, De Consolatione ad Helviam 10.6

"Why do you pile riches on riches? You really should remember how small your bodies are! Is it not madness and the wildest lunacy to desire so much when you can hold so little?"
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79415 From: James Hooper Date: 2010-08-17
Subject: Re: Latin classes: last call for Grammatica Latina
Forgive my interuption, The text book in question Wheellock, is in stock at
Amazon.
C. Pomepius Marcellus


On Mon, 16 Aug 2010 22:55:39 -0400
"A. Tullia Scholastica" <fororom@...> wrote:
>>
>>
>> A. Tullia Scholastica P. Corvae Gaudiali quiritibus, sociis, peregrinisque
>> bonae voluntatis S.P.D.
>>
>>
>> P. Corva Gaudialis A. Tulliae Scholasticae sal.
>>
>> Salve!
>>
>> How do I register for this?
>>
>> ATS: I will provide the information when you inform me that you have
>>the
>> textbook, and verify that with me. I have to check to make sure that the
>> student actually has the text, for the homework is found only there.
>>
>>
>> Is it offered through the Academia Thules?
>>
>> ATS: No, unfortunately the Academia Thules no longer exists. Their
>> course server died in early November of 2008, and it has not been repaired
>>or
>> replaced.
>>
>> Paulla
>>
>> Vale, et valete.
>>
>>
>>
>> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com <mailto:Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com> , "A.
>> Tullia Scholastica" <flavia@...> wrote:
>>> >
>>> > A. Tullia Scholastica quiritibus tironibus sociis peregrinisque bonae
>>> > voluntatis S.P.D.
>>> >
>>> > Time is getting short to register for our Grammatica Latina classes in
>>> > particular, for Grammatica I will begin on Monday, September 6th,
>>
>> (snipped)
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79416 From: Gaius Petronius Dexter Date: 2010-08-17
Subject: Today: PORTVNALIA [MMDCCLXIII auc]
Avete,

Today I made offerings to Portunus, ( incense and good French wine ) and I tossed my keys through the fire to purify them.

This is the text of the ritual that I made today to Portunus:

----------------------------------------------------------

"Portu/nalia/ sunt :// lin/guis ani/misque fa/uete !"

PRAEFATIO -

Iane pater, te hoc ture commovendo
bonas preces precor
uti sies volens propitius
Populo Novo Romano Quiritibus,
Reique Publicae Populi Novi Romani Quiritium,
mihi, domo, familiae!

Portune claviger,
portuum praeses, portarum tutor,
te hac clave igne pianda,
bonas preces precor,
uti sies volens propitius
Populo Novo Romano Quiritibus,
Reique Publicae Populi Novi Romani Quiritium,
mihi, domo, familiae!

PRECATIO -

Portune pater,
portuum praeses, portarum tutor,
te precor, oro et obtestor
uti Rem Publicam Populi Novi Romani Quiritium
miseriis, discordiis, odiis liberes,
uti salutem Rei Publicae Populi Novi Romani Quiritium
confirmes, augeas, adiuves.

SACRIFICIUM -

Portune pater,
o Matris Matutae fili,
clavium custos, portarum praeses, portuum tutor,
uti te vino ommovendo bonas preces precatus sum,
quoius rei ergo macte vino inferio esto!

PIACULUM -

Iane, Portune, Vesta,
Lares, Manes, Penates,
Omnes Di Inmortales quocumque nomine:
si quidquam vobis in his sacris displicuit,
hoc vino libando
veniam peto
et vitium meum expio.

Valete.

--
C. Petronius Dexter
Flamen Portunalis Portunalia egit
a.d. XVI Kal. Sept. P. Memmio K. Fabio II coss.


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79417 From: luciaiuliaaquila Date: 2010-08-17
Subject: Re: FERIAE PROV. SARMATIAE NOVAE ROMANAE II
Salve Corvus!

Gratias, gratias, gratias!
I am also going to present them at the North American Conventus as well -

I really enjoyed the photos of your sons mixing up their togas, they are such handsome young gentleman!

Vale bene,

Julia

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "mcorvvs" <mcorvvs@...> wrote:
>
> Salve Aquilae,
>
> sure you can! This is what it was actually made for! :) It will especially be pleasant for me since your meeting will be in Nashville, the city of Parthenon!
> And many thanks for congratulations!
>
> Optime vale,
>
> CORVVS
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "luciaiuliaaquila" <luciaiuliaaquila@> wrote:
> >
> > Salve Corvus Amice,
> >
> > I also just looked at the newest photos added today! They are magnificent.
> > May i have your permission to share them at the next meeting at Aedes Venus Genetrix here in Nashville? They are so informative in addition to being so beautiful!
> > Thank for this gift and congratulations!
> >
> > Cura ut valeas,
> >
> > Julia
> >
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79418 From: luciaiuliaaquila Date: 2010-08-17
Subject: Re: Today: PORTVNALIA [MMDCCLXIII auc]
Salve Petroni!

I have been waiting for you to post this ceremony!
It is magnificent as your rituals always are!

Gratias tibi!

Vale optime,

Julia

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Gaius Petronius Dexter" <jfarnoud94@...> wrote:
>
> Avete,
>
> Today I made offerings to Portunus, ( incense and good French wine ) and I tossed my keys through the fire to purify them.
>
> This is the text of the ritual that I made today to Portunus:
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------
>
> "Portu/nalia/ sunt :// lin/guis ani/misque fa/uete !"
>
> PRAEFATIO -
>
> Iane pater, te hoc ture commovendo
> bonas preces precor
> uti sies volens propitius
> Populo Novo Romano Quiritibus,
> Reique Publicae Populi Novi Romani Quiritium,
> mihi, domo, familiae!
>
> Portune claviger,
> portuum praeses, portarum tutor,
> te hac clave igne pianda,
> bonas preces precor,
> uti sies volens propitius
> Populo Novo Romano Quiritibus,
> Reique Publicae Populi Novi Romani Quiritium,
> mihi, domo, familiae!
>
> PRECATIO -
>
> Portune pater,
> portuum praeses, portarum tutor,
> te precor, oro et obtestor
> uti Rem Publicam Populi Novi Romani Quiritium
> miseriis, discordiis, odiis liberes,
> uti salutem Rei Publicae Populi Novi Romani Quiritium
> confirmes, augeas, adiuves.
>
> SACRIFICIUM -
>
> Portune pater,
> o Matris Matutae fili,
> clavium custos, portarum praeses, portuum tutor,
> uti te vino ommovendo bonas preces precatus sum,
> quoius rei ergo macte vino inferio esto!
>
> PIACULUM -
>
> Iane, Portune, Vesta,
> Lares, Manes, Penates,
> Omnes Di Inmortales quocumque nomine:
> si quidquam vobis in his sacris displicuit,
> hoc vino libando
> veniam peto
> et vitium meum expio.
>
> Valete.
>
> --
> C. Petronius Dexter
> Flamen Portunalis Portunalia egit
> a.d. XVI Kal. Sept. P. Memmio K. Fabio II coss.
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79419 From: rory12001 Date: 2010-08-17
Subject: Re: FERIAE PROV. SARMATIAE NOVAE ROMANAE II
Salve Corve;
your boys are gorgeous:) Actually all the wedding couples were beautiful. Those pictures are so inspiring!


>
> Salve Corvus!
>
> Gratias, gratias, gratias!
> I am also going to present them at the North American Conventus as well -
>
> I really enjoyed the photos of your sons mixing up their togas, they are such handsome young gentleman!
>
> Vale bene,
>
> Julia
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "mcorvvs" <mcorvvs@> wrote:
> >
> > Salve Aquilae,
> >
> > sure you can! This is what it was actually made for! :) It will especially be pleasant for me since your meeting will be in Nashville, the city of Parthenon!
> > And many thanks for congratulations!
> >
> > Optime vale,
> >
> > CORVVS
> >
> > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "luciaiuliaaquila" <luciaiuliaaquila@> wrote:
> > >
> > > Salve Corvus Amice,
> > >
> > > I also just looked at the newest photos added today! They are magnificent.
> > > May i have your permission to share them at the next meeting at Aedes Venus Genetrix here in Nashville? They are so informative in addition to being so beautiful!
> > > Thank for this gift and congratulations!
> > >
> > > Cura ut valeas,
> > >
> > > Julia
> > >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79420 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2010-08-17
Subject: The ideology of the feminine in Byzantine historical narrative: The
*The ideology of the feminine in Byzantine historical narrative: The role of
John Skylitzes' "Synopsis of Histories"*
by *White, Linda L.* <javascript:void(0);>, M.A., The University of Manitoba
(Canada), 2003 , 175 pages; AAT MQ89412
Abstract (Summary)

The medieval *Eastern Roman Empire* (commonly referred to as the Byzantine
Empire) is the least well documented of all the early medieval Christian
societies. Feminist historians have examined the effects of this tradition
of didactic scholarship on the portrayals of women in the Byzantine
histories and chronicles.

This thesis explores the transmission of the Byzantine ideology of feminine
behaviour with particular reference to John Skylitzes' *Synopsis of
Histories * . Skylitzes' portrayals of imperial women can be seen to conform
to an ideology of imperial women that has been articulated in the
documentary and other sources for Byzantine history (and that has been
perceived and described by other modern scholars). This ideology consists of
a system of images, ideas and beliefs that articulates an ideal that has an
historical effect. It can also be shown that in conforming to an acceptable
ideology of feminine behaviour, Skylitzes may have perpetuated the ideology
rather than a more accurate representation of reality. (Abstract shortened
by UMI.)


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79421 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2010-08-17
Subject: Culture of controversy: The Christological disputes of the early fif
*Culture of controversy: The Christological disputes of the early fifth
century*
by *Sillett, Helen Marie* <javascript:void(0);>, Ph.D., University of
California, Berkeley, 1999 , 197 pages; AAT 9931400
Abstract (Summary)

In the early fifth century, proponents of two distinct Christian theologies
confronted one another in a series of bitter disputes--the Christological
controversies. Each party of bishops sought to establish its own
interpretation of the problem of the simultaneous divinity and humanity of
Christ as a universal orthodoxy, to be held by Christians across the *eastern
Roman empire*. My dissertation explores the argumentative tactics of two
dominant participants and rivals in the controversies--Cyril of Alexandria
and Theodoret of Cyrus.

In part one I identify the rhetorical strategies Cyril of Alexandria
engineered to transform an orthodox bishop, Nestorius of Constantinople,
into a heretic, and to create a heretical school out of a legitimate
theological tradition. In part two I offer a new reading of Theodoret of
Cyrus' famous collection of biographies of Syrian ascetics, the *Religious
History * . I interpret this source, normally used only in the study of
monasticism, as a polemical document which contested Cyril of Alexandria's
aggressions against Syrian Christianity and Antiochene theology. In part
three I explore Theodoret's construction of the relationship between heresy
and orthodoxy in his Compendium of Heretical Fables [Special characters
omitted.] which still awaits a modern critical edition and remains almost
completely unstudied. I observe that Theodoret rejected the traditional
linear, genealogical structure of writing against heresy, and built his
narrative instead around the confrontation and synthesis of opposing
doctrines. I argue that this unusual interpretation of the history of heresy
permitted Theodoret to find intellectual value in the enmities and
confrontation of the Christological controversies. His dialectical narrative
also allowed Theodoret to claim the importance of theological diversity for
the evolution of sound doctrine, an assertion which defended the place in
Christian tradition of Nestorius' views, which were by then officially
heretical.


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79422 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2010-08-17
Subject: Magic and religious authority in Philostratus' "Life of Apollonius o
*Magic and religious authority in Philostratus' "Life of Apollonius of
Tyana"*
by *Abraham, Roshan J.* <javascript:void(0);>, Ph.D., University of
Pennsylvania, 2009 , 184 pages; AAT 3363239
Abstract (Summary)

This dissertation examines Flavius Philostratus' *Life of Apollonius of
Tyana * , an eight-book biography written in the early third century CE
about a Cappadocian sage who lived in the first century. Prior to
Philostratus' biography, Apollonius had a reputation of being a magician.
Philostratus isolates two explicit reasons for Apollonius negative
reputation: his association with *eastern* sages, particularly Indian
Brahmans, and his gift of foreknowledge. I examine how Philostratus defends
Apollonius by (1) representing India as a Hellenistic utopia, a land of pure
Greek identity, uncomplicated by the realities of the *Roman Empire*, and
(2) creating a theory of Apollonius' foreknowledge ( *prognosis * ) rooted
in contemporary Middle Platonic physical and ethical philosophy. I conclude
that the implicit reason for the accusation of being a magician made against
Apollonius stems from the threat he presents to traditional political and
religious authority. In my analysis, Philostratus' Apollonius represents
both the contours of Greek identity under the *Roman Empire* and the rise of
the *pagan* holy man.


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79423 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2010-08-17
Subject: THE CULTURAL BASES OF MONTANISM
*THE CULTURAL BASES OF MONTANISM*
by *GOREE, BALFOUR WILLIAM, JR.* <javascript:void(0);>, Ph.D., Baylor
University, 1980 , 312 pages; AAT 8025229
Abstract (Summary)

About the middle of the second century a religious movement, later known as
Montanism, developed in central Anatolia. The movement, which was a strange
blend of ecstatic prophecy, asceticism and eschatology, was to have far
reaching effects for several centuries in both the *eastern* and western
parts of the *Roman Empire*.

Many of the past studies of the Montanist sect have attempted to explain its
emergence by focusing on a very narrow range of characteristics. Augustus
Neander, for example, examined Tertullian's type of Montanism and judged the
movement to have been a reaction against Gnosticism. F. C. Baur, using the
Hegelian approach to historical studies, understood Montanism as an
antithesis reacting against the developing hierarchy in the second century
church. The Religionsgeschichteschule, represented by such figures as Albert
Schwe ler (who actually anticipated the movement with his methodology) and
Wilhelm Ernst Schepelern, understood the sect to have been strongly
influenced by the *pagan* cult of Cybele, which was still powerful in that
area. J. Massingberd Ford has recently expressed her belief that Montanism
was a Jewish-Christian heresy.

The purpose of this dissertation is to examine the culture of the Anatolian
societies which was the seed-bed which produced Montanism and saw it through
several centuries of development. The first chapter examines the history of
the civilizations in central Anatolia from 7000 B.C. to A.D. 200. Major
attention is focused on the prevailing characteristics of religion in the
societies which occupied the region during this long period. Chapter two
investigates the introduction of Christianity into the Phrygian region and
notes its progress before Montanism began. The characteristics of the strain
of Christianity which were responsible for planting the movement in central
and northern Phrygia where Montanism was strongest are also delineated. The
third chapter explores the development of the Montanist sect in Phrygia and
other Anatolian areas before A.D. 200. Special attention is given to
determining, where possible, the cultural bases of such characteristic
beliefs and practices of the movement as its views on the Godhead,
revelation, eschatology, ascetic practices, the special role of women and
organizational structure. The final chapter examines Montanism in such other
locales as Gaul, Rome, North Africa and Spain as well as in Phrygia in later
times. These same theological characteristics are examined to determine if
changes took place in the beliefs and practices of the movement as a result
of the passage of time and changes in locale. Original sources, such as the
collections by Labriolle and Bonwetsch, are used whenever possible.

The study indicates that Montanism was reacting against certain facets of
the established church life of its day, especially the moral laxity which
developed when the church no longer expected the immediate return of Jesus
and began to come to terms with the world around it. Yet, strangely enough,
the sect was in reality a syncretistic movement which drew upon principles
found in the cult of Cybele, Phrygian Judaism and the peculiar strain of
militant Christianity which was prevalent in the area to shape the beliefs
and practices which characterized it. This study also indicates that
Tertullian, while an eloquent spokesman for the movement, did not change it
significantly except with regard to the role women were allowed to play in
the North African branch of the sect. In fact more changes are evident
between Montanism of the late second century in Phrygia and that of the
fourth and fifth centuries in the same area than can be found in comparing
the early Phrygian and North African branches of the movement.


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79424 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2010-08-17
Subject: Visualizing medieval otherworlds in Greco-Byzantine romances
*Visualizing medieval otherworlds in Greco-Byzantine romances*
by *Christoforatou, Christina* <javascript:void(0);>, Ph.D., City University
of New York, 2003 , 363 pages; AAT 3103094
Abstract (Summary)

In this dissertation I examine language's ability to generate imagery and to
convey multifarious landscapes through the study of ekphrasis, a rhetorical
trope that evolved into a staple of medieval Greek romance. Ekphrases of
Levantine otherworlds are literary mines of cultural and historical
information: they weave into a detailed narrative, information that ranges
in origin from the realm of the purely historical to that of the writers'
fertile imagination. They also provide unusually clear insight into medieval
Greek writers' perceptions of their immediate surroundings, daily life,
yearnings, anxieties, and fears; thus, my study of such descriptions brings
to the fore the socio-political desires, cultural needs, and literary
sensibilities of Greek people in the Middle Ages.

I examine the Greek novelistic romances (100 BC-300 AD) and their Byzantine
successors, the romances of the Komnenian and Palaiologan periods (1081-1185
and 1204-1453, respectively) in light of the literary and cultural
influences that permeated the genre, particularly after the establishment of
Christianity as a prominent religion in the Levant, perceiving the Greek
romances as products of the intellectual life of the early *Roman Empire*.

In the first two chapters I explore the interpretive possibilities ekphrasis
offers to a contemporary understanding of medieval Levantine otherworlds
(utopian, dystopian, real or imaginary) that are described in the early
Greek and Byzantine romances. In addition, I study the evolution of
idealized *pagan* locations or enclosed gardens of desire from their early
appearance in detailed narrative passages in the Greek novelistic romances,
to their Christian appropriation in the Komnenian and Palaiologan romances.
Here I focus on the allegorical shift in the projection of utopias and
enclosed gardens in an effort to reveal historical, cultural, and religious
influences that necessitated such a change.

In chapters three and four I examine the narrative expression of marvelous
and sublime episodes in both genres--the Greek novelistic romances and their
Byzantine successors. I also examine how the Greek novelistic romances and
their Byzantine successors project fantastic and dystopian otherworlds--here
I focus on dystopian descriptions and those events (natural or supernatural)
and agents (human or divine) that make the existence of such fictional
places possible.


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79425 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2010-08-17
Subject: "Pluralism" and "universalism" in the world of Libanios
*"Pluralism" and "universalism" in the world of Libanios*
by *Burr, Elizabeth Geraldine* <javascript:void(0);>, Ph.D., Harvard
University, 1996 , 258 pages; AAT 9710491
Abstract (Summary)

The aim of this dissertation is to evaluate the content and direction of *
pagan*-Christian relations in the *Eastern Roman empire* of the fourth and
fifth centuries C.E. on the basis of literary and archaeological evidence:
(1) selected letters and orations of the fourth-century sophist Libanios,
native of Syrian Antioch, supplemented with brief excursuses on Julian and
John Chrysostom; and (2) archaeological data drawn from four sites in
western Asia Minor, culturally still within the "world of Libanios":
Ephesos, Pergamon, Sardis, and Aphrodisias.

The conceptual framework of the study is defined by the theoretical
opposites nominated "pluralism" and "universalism," which have often been
associated respectively with polytheistic paganism and monotheistic
Christianity. Religious pluralism, for the purposes of the dissertation,
connotes tolerance, coexistence, and inclusivity; universalism connotes
intolerance, confrontation, and exclusivity. In the first case other
religious paths are existentially recognized, and in the second they are
not. Neither stance has ever been fully realized in history, so that the two
constructs function as heuristic principles. They occupy the poles of an
imagined continuum.

Analysis of the letters and orations of Libanios reveals that his own
relative pluralism reaches across the generic and chronological gap
separating the two sets of writings. The inference is drawn that the
pluralistic language of these documents reflects not only the author's
individual "bias" but also the tenor of his collective world. By comparison,
such voices as those of the "universalists" Julian and John Chrysostom
conflict with the normative culture. Yet they also exemplify the range of
possible rhetorical "interactions" between *pagans* and Christians.

The civic-traditional paganism of Libanios finds an analogue in the
archaeological part of the dissertation, where three varieties of paganism
are differentiated: civic-traditional cults, foreign and international
cults, and the quasi-universalist imperial cult. The inclusion of
archaeological evidence extends the field of inquiry typologically,
geographically, and chronologically (beyond the fifth century). The
archaeological data prove crucial for the argument, demonstrating on the one
hand the spectrum of relational phenomena and on the other the tendency to
articulate interreligious positions or responses that are more pluralistic
than universalist, a tendency "prefigured" rhetorically in the works of
Libanios.


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79426 From: aerdensrw Date: 2010-08-17
Subject: Re: Avitus' protreptic to Nova Roma
P. Corva Gaudialis M. Hortensiae Maiori sal. (I hope that's correct.)

Better Deutsch than Cymraeg. :)

Caption from a cartoon of someone on Wheel of Fortune (a game show in the US):

Contestant: "I'd like to buy a vowel."

Emcee: "Do keep in mind that the category is Welsh place name."

Paulla

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "rory12001" <rory12001@...> wrote:
>
> oops, gratias, lol..bildungsroman too but there are longer words.
> vale
> Maior

(snipped)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79427 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2010-08-17
Subject: Patterns of patronage: The politics and ideology of public building
*Patterns of patronage: The politics and ideology of public building
in the Eastern
Roman Empire (31 BCE-600 CE)*
by *Kalinowski, Angela Victoria* <javascript:void(0);>, Ph.D., University of
Toronto (Canada), 1996 , 255 pages; AAT NQ35439
Abstract (Summary)

This thesis examines the private patronage of public building in selected
cities of the *Eastern Roman Empire*, ca. 31 BCE to 600. It argues that the
complex ideological and political meaning of public budding can be
understood through the extension of a model of patron/client relations in
Roman society which defines patronage as a reciprocal, non-commercial
exchange of goods or services between people of different social status.

Part One of the study demonstrates the usefulness of the model for examining
the patterns of building patronage in early imperial Ephesos. The first
chapter locates the ideological and political functions of the patronage of
public building within the context of Roman patronage as a whole. Chapter
Two uses epigraphic evidence to show that it was the local élite who
dominated public budding at Ephesos and describes the types of structures
they built. Chapter Three analyses the placement, form and content of
building-related inscriptions from Ephesos in order to reveal the political
and ideological meanings and motivations behind the private finance of
public building. Chapter Four presents a case study in the social and
political uses of building, focusing on a series of buildings and
inscriptions related to the activities of Marcus Claudius Publius Vedius
Antoninus Phaedrus Sabinianus, a prominent citizen of mid-second century
Ephesos.

In Part Two, the model is extended to budding patronage in Late Antique Asia
Minor. Chapter Five uses the inscriptions of Aphrodisias and Ephesos to show
that there were two major shifts in the Patterns of patronage ca. 284-600.
In the first phase of development, the patronage of public building was
dominated by provincial governors. In the second, responsibility for the
finance of civic structures returned to the local élite. Chapter Six then
analyses the language and content of building inscriptions in order to show
that, despite these shifts in personnel, the ideological and political
meaning of building remained remarkably constant from the first through
sixth centuries CE.


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79428 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2010-08-17
Subject: Towards Roman Edessa: 114-242 C.E
*Towards Roman Edessa: 114-242 C.E*
by *Ross, Steven Kirk* <javascript:void(0);>, Ph.D., University of
California, Berkeley, 1997 , 298 pages; AAT 9803334
Abstract (Summary)

The ancient city of Edessa (modern-day Urfa, Turkey) is studied from the
point of view of politics, society and culture during a period of increasing
*Roman* involvement in the East, beginning with Trajan's Parthian War
(114-116 C.E.). Well-watered and located on an important trade route, Edessa
(founded ca. 304 B.C.E.) saw major urban development in the Seleucid period,
but came under Parthian influence at the end of the second century. Its
rulers--the Abgarid dynasty with Arab/Nabataean connections--pursued a
semi-independent policy until Edessa came permanently within the
*Roman*orbit under Septimius Severus (194 C.E.). The dissertation
clarifies the
process of absorption into the *empire* using epigraphic, numismatic and
historical material, some recently discovered. Analyzing newly published
documents and the coins of Edessa's last king, Abgar X (239-242 C.E.), it
concludes that this king took his throne in service to Rome during the
confrontation with Sassanid Persia, holding an official "consulship,"
perhaps signifying a regional governorship.

A major section takes up the cultural life and antecedents of Edessa, which
in the later period became a center of Christian activity and an important
link in the transmission of Classical literature via Syriac and Arabic.
Focusing on Edessene religion, on Bardai san, the "first Syriac
philosopher," and on artistic influences as reflected in funerary mosaics,
it concludes that the period beginning with Abgar VIII was a Golden Age of
prosperity and cultural production. Greek, Semitic and Persian cultural
influences contributed to a unique culture that could be called neither "*
eastern*" nor "western" in its primary orientation. Although the earliest
preserved Syriac literature contains concepts derived from Greek philosophy,
evidence for the first two centuries of the Common Era is scarce, and no
firm conclusions can be drawn about the extent of Hellenization at Edessa
before the arrival of Christianity. The famous *myth* of an exchange of
letters between a King Abgar and Jesus is shown to have no basis in fact,
and not to reflect--as has been widely thought--the conversion of a later
king to Christianity.


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79429 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2010-08-17
Subject: Seeds of imperialism: A core/periphery study in the Eastern Roman Em
*Seeds of imperialism: A core/periphery study in the Eastern Roman Empire*
by *Ramsay, Jennifer* <javascript:void(0);>, Ph.D., Simon Fraser University
(Canada), 2008 , 538 pages; AAT NR58522
Abstract (Summary)

This dissertation examines the archaeobotanical record within the working
framework of World-Systems Theory to test core/periphery relations in the
Eastern Mediterranean. The goals of this research are: determining if the
archaeobotanical record supports Caesarea as a core port city in the
Byzantine period; identifying the changing role of Caesarea through time;
understanding the function of agricultural trade in the local economy; and
if changes in agricultural practices can be indicated by weed species. The
village of Khirbet Qana and the settlement of Humayma were used as examples
of periphery sites that were occupied during the same periods as Caesarea.
Analysis of quantification methods to examine taxon diversity, evidence of
trade and intensity of agriculture were used as primary indicators of the
socioeconomic systems that existed at classical sites. Results yielded a low
number of seeds per sample, limiting the validity of taxon diversity as a
measure. Instead, ubiquity and density were deemed better indicators of the
variety of taxa.

The botanical assemblage indicates that Caesarea acted as a core in the
Byzantine period with its large number of exotic or luxury species, its
large variety of plant taxa and the evidence of agricultural trade
represented by the waterlogged remains recovered from the harbour. The
Islamic period saw a shift from core to semi-periphery as indicated by the
smaller quantities of agricultural trade goods recovered and a decline in
the variety of taxa recovered. In the Crusader period it was expected that
Caesarea would show as a periphery site; however, the botanical remains
recovered shared a similar pattern with the Byzantine period, though with
slightly less taxonomic variety and density of remains per sample. This
suggests that the Crusader period was representative of a semi-periphery and
not a periphery as was expected. Likewise the site of Humayma was thought to
be a periphery but the archaeobotanical assemblage supports a semi-periphery
site. It was determined that more information is required to confirm a
periphery status for Khirbet Qana.


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79430 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2010-08-18
Subject: Hermes Arabicus
*Hermes Arabicus*
by *van Bladel, Kevin Thomas* <javascript:void(0);>, Ph.D., Yale University,
2004 , 367 pages; AAT 3125321
Abstract (Summary)

The present work investigates the figure of Hermes Trismegistus and the
texts attributed to him in Arabic tradition. Collectively these Hermetica
are one of the foundations of medieval science and magic. The idea of Hermes
Trismegistus arose in Hellenistic and *Roman* Egypt when the Egyptian god
Thoth was identified with Hermes in Greek. Numerous writings on subjects
including alchemy, astrology, and philosophy were written and attributed to
that name in classical Egypt. However, the relationship between the
approximately fifty texts in Arabic attributed to Hermes and the original
Greek Hermetica has remained unknown. How did the Egyptian Hermes enter
Arabic literature? Are the Arabic Hermetica translations from Greek, or are
they later compositions attributed to the same name in knowledge of the
Greek tradition? The relationship of these two Hermetic traditions is the
central problem under examination.

After an introduction to previous scholarship on the Arabic Hermetica, the
present work investigates the transmission of Greek Hermetica into Arabic
first by way of Middle Persian intermediaries, translations made from Greek
into Persian in the Sasanian *Empire*, and then discusses the possible role
of so-called Sabians (*pagans*) of the Syrian city Harran as mediators of
Hermetica into Arabic. The biographical legend of three Hermeses, known from
many medieval Arabic sources, is analyzed and its parts are traced to
various sources including late antique Christian chronicles, early Muslim
tradition, and Iranian national legend. This shows how medieval Arabic
scholars came to their notion of Hermes as the prophet of science. The next
chapter presents in translation and in the original Arabic all of the wise
sayings extant in Arabic collections, showing what kind of teacher Hermes
was supposed to be. These sayings also have Greek and Persian antecedents
some of which are discovered here. Finally a census of the works attributed
to Hermes extant in Arabic opens the way for the future edition of Arabic
Hermetica.

The general conclusion is that Arabic Hermetic literature emerged out of the
combination of various traditions including Greek, Persian, and Syriac
components and *pagan*, Muslim, Jewish, Christian contributions.


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79431 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2010-08-18
Subject: CELSUS AND LATE SECOND-CENTURY CHRISTIANITY
*CELSUS AND LATE SECOND-CENTURY CHRISTIANITY*
by *BURKE, GARY TAPP* <javascript:void(0);>, Ph.D., The University of Iowa,
1981 , 246 pages; AAT 8209967
Abstract (Summary)

Walter Bauer's view of Christian origins has gained wide acceptance, but it
is based primarily on Christian sources, which, he believes, distort the
actual situation in their favor. Hence, independent evidence offers the
greatest promise for testing the validity of Bauer's hypothesis. Celsus
presents by far the most extensive extant outsider's discussion of
Christianity during the period covered by Bauer. Thus, Celsus' True Doctrine
has been examined both to determine its usefulness as a source for late
second-century Christianity and to test Bauer's hypothesis.

Celsus was an otherwise-unknown, late second-century *pagan* antagonist of
Christianity. Earlier attempts at precision in dating his True Doctrine or
in determining his nationality are faulty, but he is known to have traveled
in the *Eastern* part of the *Roman Empire*, and his date is probably during
the reign of Marcus Aurelius. Both Origen's preservation of Celsus' work and
the preservation of his Against Celsus in the manuscript tradition are of
high enough quality to render this study of Celsus' statements valid.

Celsus' knowledge of Christianity was both extensive and detailed. Of the
Christian Scriptures, he had direct acquaintance with Genesis, Matthew,
Luke, I Corinthians and perhaps more. He reflects extensive knowledge of the
religion of the apologists, but, contrary to Carl Andresen and others,
direct knowledge of any of the extant apologies cannot be proven. The same
can be said for extant gnostic writings. He also gained some of his
knowledge of Christianity from non-literary Christian sources, both gnostic
and orthodox. From these sources he encountered Christian evangelistic
activities and slogans and gained insights into Christians' social status
and probably much more.

This study has found that Celsus is an excellent source for late
second-century Christianity and that, particularly for the Bauer question,
he exhibits a remarkable ability to distinguish competing Christian groups
and theologies. In connection with Bauer, it has been found that Celsus
presents rather strong evidence against his contention that in the East
heresy usually preceded and outnumbered orthodoxy, especially the latter.


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79432 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2010-08-18
Subject: Re: Latin classes: last call for Grammatica Latina
>
> A. Tullia Scholastica C. Pompeio Marcello quiritibus, sociis, peregrinisque
> bonae voluntatis S.P.D.
>
>
>
>
>
> Forgive my interuption, The text book in question Wheellock, is in stock at
> Amazon.
> C. Pomepius Marcellus
>
>
>
> ATS: I¹m not sure whether you are making a statement or asking a question
> here, but the Wheelock text should be available on Amazon as well as from the
> Wheelock site and from many college bookstores in English-speaking (and other)
> countries.
>
>
> Vale, et valete.
>
>
>
> On Mon, 16 Aug 2010 22:55:39 -0400
> "A. Tullia Scholastica" <fororom@... <mailto:fororom%40localnet.com>
> > wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> A. Tullia Scholastica P. Corvae Gaudiali quiritibus, sociis,
>>> peregrinisque
>>> >> bonae voluntatis S.P.D.
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> P. Corva Gaudialis A. Tulliae Scholasticae sal.
>>> >>
>>> >> Salve!
>>> >>
>>> >> How do I register for this?
>>> >>
>>> >> ATS: I will provide the information when you inform me that you have
>>> >>the
>>> >> textbook, and verify that with me. I have to check to make sure that the
>>> >> student actually has the text, for the homework is found only there.
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> Is it offered through the Academia Thules?
>>> >>
>>> >> ATS: No, unfortunately the Academia Thules no longer exists. Their
>>> >> course server died in early November of 2008, and it has not been
>>> repaired
>>> >>or
>>> >> replaced.
>>> >>
>>> >> Paulla
>>> >>
>>> >> Vale, et valete.
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com <mailto:Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com>
>>> <mailto:Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com> , "A.
>>> >> Tullia Scholastica" <flavia@...> wrote:
>>>>> >>> >
>>>>> >>> > A. Tullia Scholastica quiritibus tironibus sociis peregrinisque
bonae
>>>>> >>> > voluntatis S.P.D.
>>>>> >>> >
>>>>> >>> > Time is getting short to register for our Grammatica Latina
>>>>> classes in
>>>>> >>> > particular, for Grammatica I will begin on Monday, September 6th,
>>> >>
>>> >> (snipped)
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >>
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>> >
>
>
>




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79433 From: rory12001 Date: 2010-08-18
Subject: a Praetorial Warning & unfairness
Salvete;
I received this final warning today below. Wow, my words,after being abused so nastily on this list were quite mild.

Talk about double standards. Gualterus did tell everyone, after the vituperative was over "we must remain civil"
Right.
valete
M. Hortensia Maior

"Go back to the Bitch Alley, Maior, and rot there with the rest of your garbage." Enodia
"when has Maior ever let the truth interfere with what she believed?"
" [conventus matronarum' You advertised your list, containing a potentially pornographic picture on
your page" Sulla
", but it is divorced from a
brain" Gn. Iulius Caesar


Salve Maior,

This is an official warning about your recent lack of control on the ML. I specifically refer to msg #79356 where you comment: "Rofl; just shows you what this list consists of : dumb and dumber." You know well your point could have been made in a non-inflammatory manner. You have been placed on moderation already twice before and this is a warning that if you do not get yourself under control then a third moderation will be forthcoming.

I find your offences especially egregious since you have been so vocal about strict moderation on the ML, yet you are the main offender in violating the moderation edict. Tread carefully since the next moderation may not be limited to 72 hours.

Vale,

Gualterus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79434 From: gualterus_graecus Date: 2010-08-18
Subject: Re: a Praetorial Warning & unfairness
Salvete,

Maior is obfuscating the facts.

Firstly, Enodia's, Caesar's and Sulla's (79320) comments were part of the sensitive thread "Farewell, Nova Roma" for which a general warning was given. This thread included two posts where Maior insulted people by using the word "idiot" (79295, 79309). All of these instances were covered by my general warning in msg 79329.

Sulla's concern about a pornographic image was sincere (#79357); I don't agree with the photo being pornographic, but everyone is free to voice a concern about Yahoo TOS issues.

I asked everyone to remain civil in msg #79329, but who violated it, ignoring my general warning? Maior did in msg #79356 by claiming "this list consists of : dumb and dumber", which is what prompted the final warning. Part of what influenced the earnestness of the warning is that she has twice been moderated for uncivil behavior since the end of her magistracy, while at the same time being so vocal (in my view insincerely) about the importance of strict moderation on the ML.

The situation is clear. Maior has in recent months been the most egregious violator of order on the ML. She should be relieved that the Praetura has been so tolerant and measured in its reactions.

Valete,

Gualterus Graecus
Praetorian Quaestor

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "rory12001" <rory12001@...> wrote:
>
> Salvete;
> I received this final warning today below. Wow, my words,after being abused so nastily on this list were quite mild.
>
> Talk about double standards. Gualterus did tell everyone, after the vituperative was over "we must remain civil"
> Right.
> valete
> M. Hortensia Maior
>
> "Go back to the Bitch Alley, Maior, and rot there with the rest of your garbage." Enodia
> "when has Maior ever let the truth interfere with what she believed?"
> " [conventus matronarum' You advertised your list, containing a potentially pornographic picture on
> your page" Sulla
> ", but it is divorced from a
> brain" Gn. Iulius Caesar
>
>
> Salve Maior,
>
> This is an official warning about your recent lack of control on the ML. I specifically refer to msg #79356 where you comment: "Rofl; just shows you what this list consists of : dumb and dumber." You know well your point could have been made in a non-inflammatory manner. You have been placed on moderation already twice before and this is a warning that if you do not get yourself under control then a third moderation will be forthcoming.
>
> I find your offences especially egregious since you have been so vocal about strict moderation on the ML, yet you are the main offender in violating the moderation edict. Tread carefully since the next moderation may not be limited to 72 hours.
>
> Vale,
>
> Gualterus
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79435 From: marcushoratius Date: 2010-08-18
Subject: a. d. XV Kalendas Septembris: Venus of Eryx and Rome
M. Moravius Piscinus Pontifex Maximus Quiritibus cultoribus Deorum et omnibus salutem plurimam dicit: Di vos salvas et servatas volunt.

Hodie est ante diem XV Kalendas Septembris; haec dies comitialis est: divo Iulio ad Forum

AUC 724 / 29 BCE: Dedication of the Temple of Divus Iulius by Augustus

The temple had earlier been planned by the second Triumvirs. There already stood an altar of Divus Iulius in the Forum, in front of the Regia where he was cremated. The Temple was constructed in the western end of the Forum, near the Forum Iulia.

"They also laid the foundation of a shrine to him, as hero, in the Forum, on the spot where his body had been burned, and caused an image of him, together with a second image, that of Venus, to be carried in the procession at the Circensian games. And whenever news came of a victory anywhere, they assigned the honour of a thanksgiving to the victor by himself and to Caesar, though dead, by himself. And they compelled everybody to celebrate his birthday by wearing laurel and by merry-making, passing a law that those who neglected these observances should be accursed in the sight of Jupiter and of Caesar himself, and, in the case of senators or senators' sons, that they should forfeit a million sesterces. Now it happened that the Ludi Apollinares fell on the same day, and they therefore voted that his birthday feast should be celebrated on the previous day, on the ground that there was an oracle of the Sibyl which forbade the holding of a festival on Apollo's day to any God except Apollo." ~ Cassius Dio 47.18

But it was not until today's date, in 29 BCE, after Augustus had defeated Marcus Antonius and Cleopatra that the temple was dedicated and games instituted.

"After finishing this celebration Caesar dedicated the temple of Minerva, called also the Chalcidicum, and the Curia Iulia, which had been built in honour of his father. In the latter he set up the statue of Victory which is still in existence, thus signifying that it was from her that he had received the empire. It had belonged to the people of Tarentum, whence it was now brought to Rome, placed in the senate-chamber, and decked with the spoils of Egypt. The same course was followed in the case of the shrine of Julius which was consecrated at this time, for many of these spoils were placed in it also; and others were dedicated to Jupiter Capitolinus and to Juno and Minerva, after all the objects in these temples which were supposed to have been placed there previously as dedications, or were actually dedications, had by decree been taken down at this time as defiled. Thus Cleopatra, though defeated and captured, was nevertheless glorified, inasmuch as her adornments repose as dedications in our temples and she herself is seen in gold in the shrine of Venus.

"At the consecration of the shrine to Julius there were all kinds of contests, and the boys of the patricians performed the equestrian exercise called "Troy," and men of the same rank contended with chargers, with pairs, and with four-horse teams; furthermore, one Quintus Vitellius, a senator, fought as a gladiator. Wild beasts and tame animals were slain in vast numbers, among them a rhinoceros and a hippopotamus, beasts then seen for the first time in Rome. As regards the nature of the hippopotamus, it has been described by many and far more have seen it. The rhinoceros, on the other hand, is in general somewhat like an elephant, but it has also a horn on its very nose and has got its name because of this. These beasts, accordingly, were brought in, and moreover Dacians and Suebi fought in crowds with one another. The latter are Germans, the former Scythians of a sort. The Suebi, to be exact, dwell beyond the Rhine (though many people elsewhere claim their name), and the Dacians on both sides of the Ister; those of the latter, however, who live on this side of the river near the country of the Triballi are reckoned in with the district of Moesia and are called Moesians, except by those living in the immediate neighbourhood, while those on the other side are called Dacians and are either a branch of the Getae are Thracians belonging to the Dacian race that once inhabited Rhodope. Now these Dacians had before this time sent envoys to Caesar; but when they obtained none of their requests, they went over to Antony. They proved of no great assistance to him, however, owing to strife among themselves, and some who were afterwards captured were now matched against the Suebi. The whole spectacle lasted many days, as one would expect, and there was no interruption, even though Caesar fell ill, but it was carried on in his absence under the direction of others. On one of the days of this celebration the senators gave banquets in the vestibules of their several homes; but what the occasion was for their doing this, I do not know, since it is not recorded." ~ Cassius Dio 51.22


ROME AND VENUS OF ERYX

Eryx was a son of Aphroditê and Butas, a certain native king of Sicily of very great fame, and he was admired by the natives because of his noble birth on his mother's side and became king over a part of the island. He also founded a notable city which bore his name; it was set upon a lofty place, and on the highest point within the city he established a shrine of his Mother, which he embellished not only with a beautifully built temple, but also with the multitude of his dedications. 2 The Goddess, both because of the reverence which the inhabitants of the region paid to Her and because of the honor which She received from the son whom She had borne, displayed an exceptional love for the city, and for this reason She came to be called Erycinian Aphroditê. And a man may well be filled with wonder when he stops to sum up the fame which has gathered about this shrine; 3 all other sanctuaries have indeed enjoyed a flush of fame, but frequently sundry happenings have brought them low, whereas this is the only temple which, founded as it was at the beginning of time, not only has never failed to be the object of veneration but, on the contrary, has as time went on ever continued to enjoy great growth. 4 For after Eryx has bestowed upon it the honors we have described, Aeneas, the son of Aphroditê, when at a later time he was on his way to Italy and came to anchor off the island, embellished the sanctuary, since it was that of his own Mother, with many votive offerings; after him the Sicanians paid honor to the Goddess for many generations and kept continually embellishing it with both magnificent sacrifices and votive offerings; and after that time the Carthaginians, when they had become the masters of a part of Sicily, never failed to hold the Goddess in special honor. And last of all the Romans, when they had subdued all Sicily, surpassed all people who had preceded them in the honors they paid to Her. 5 And it was with good reason that they did so, for since they traced back their ancestry to Her and for this reason were successful in their undertakings, they were but requiting her who was the cause of their aggrandizement with such expressions of gratitude and honors as they owed to Her. 6 The consuls and praetors, for instance, who visit the island and all Romans who sojourn there clothed with any authority, whenever they come to Eryx, embellish the sanctuary with magnificent sacrifices and honors, and laying aside the austerity of their authority, they enter into sports and have conversation with women in a spirit of great gaiety, believing that only in this way will they make their presence there pleasing to the Goddess. 7 Indeed the Roman senate has so zealously concerned itself with the honors of the Goddess that it has decreed that the seventeen cities of Sicily which are most faithful to Rome shall pay a tax in gold to Aphroditê, and that two hundred soldiers shall serve as a guard of Her shrine. ~ Diodorus 4.83


Our thought for today is from Sextus, Pythagorean Sentences 30 and 32:

"Ask those things of God which it is worthy of God to bestow; ask those things of God which you cannot receive from man."



Visit Religio_Romana_Cultorum_Deorum-subscribe@yahoogroups.com


_______________
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79436 From: marcushoratius Date: 2010-08-18
Subject: Re: a Praetorial Warning & unfairness
M. Moravius Gualtero dicit

You demonstrate precisely the prejudices of a minority group that has been harassing female sacerdotes and magistrates, which led to the loss of our Virgo Maxima, our CFO, and our Praetrices this year.

How does saying "ROFL . . . dumb and dumber" compare to Enodia calling Maior "bitch"?

How does a non-pornographic photo on another site compare to the one Sulla had on his list depicting Complutensis and Cordus double-banging Maior? And what of the electronic harassment conducted by Sulla against Maior, against Equestria, against the Virgo Maxima? Two of those women resigned because of the harassment they have received from this group in the Back Alley. Thanks to Sulla and his friends Nova Roma lost its CFO and its Virgo Maxima, and both of our Praetrices.

What of Maior? She is made of stronger stuff, standing up to the harassment. And that is why she has become such a target for Sulla, his house-guest Metellus and the rest of the Back Alley Boys. So what do you do? Moderate her for defending herself even as you allow others to throw worse insults at her. Are you part of the moderation team that was set up to prevent this sort of conduct on our lists? Or are you part of those BABies who are attempting to drive more women away from Nova Roma?

And since when is the term "idiot" so more offensive than Caesar saying Maior was detached from her brain? Is he alluding to beheading Maior for standing up to the abuse she and other women have received from his BAB friends? Did you warn him or any of these others for their persistent insults to our magistrates and sacerdotes?

And why shouldn't Maior be upset when people are continually and unjustly insulting her even after the Censors issued a nota against Metellus for his gross insults against her? This has been a campaign of insults directed against the women of Nova Roma, and in my opinion it is a matter of idiocy on the part of the Senate, certain magistrates and their appointees like you who have condoned, permitted, and even joined in with these foul-mouthed, ill-mannered, disrepectful individuals who do nothing but spread their filth and encourage others to sexually harass women who actually work for Nova Roma. It is idiotic of the Albucius faction to allow this sort of behavior to continue when it has for so long been detrimintal to Nova Roma.




--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "gualterus_graecus" <waltms1@...> wrote:
>
> Salvete,
>
> Maior is obfuscating the facts.
>
> Firstly, Enodia's, Caesar's and Sulla's (79320) comments were part of the sensitive thread "Farewell, Nova Roma" for which a general warning was given. This thread included two posts where Maior insulted people by using the word "idiot" (79295, 79309). All of these instances were covered by my general warning in msg 79329.
>
> Sulla's concern about a pornographic image was sincere (#79357); I don't agree with the photo being pornographic, but everyone is free to voice a concern about Yahoo TOS issues.
>
> I asked everyone to remain civil in msg #79329, but who violated it, ignoring my general warning? Maior did in msg #79356 by claiming "this list consists of : dumb and dumber", which is what prompted the final warning. Part of what influenced the earnestness of the warning is that she has twice been moderated for uncivil behavior since the end of her magistracy, while at the same time being so vocal (in my view insincerely) about the importance of strict moderation on the ML.
>
> The situation is clear. Maior has in recent months been the most egregious violator of order on the ML. She should be relieved that the Praetura has been so tolerant and measured in its reactions.
>
> Valete,
>
> Gualterus Graecus
> Praetorian Quaestor
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "rory12001" <rory12001@> wrote:
> >
> > Salvete;
> > I received this final warning today below. Wow, my words,after being abused so nastily on this list were quite mild.
> >
> > Talk about double standards. Gualterus did tell everyone, after the vituperative was over "we must remain civil"
> > Right.
> > valete
> > M. Hortensia Maior
> >
> > "Go back to the Bitch Alley, Maior, and rot there with the rest of your garbage." Enodia
> > "when has Maior ever let the truth interfere with what she believed?"
> > " [conventus matronarum' You advertised your list, containing a potentially pornographic picture on
> > your page" Sulla
> > ", but it is divorced from a
> > brain" Gn. Iulius Caesar
> >
> >
> > Salve Maior,
> >
> > This is an official warning about your recent lack of control on the ML. I specifically refer to msg #79356 where you comment: "Rofl; just shows you what this list consists of : dumb and dumber." You know well your point could have been made in a non-inflammatory manner. You have been placed on moderation already twice before and this is a warning that if you do not get yourself under control then a third moderation will be forthcoming.
> >
> > I find your offences especially egregious since you have been so vocal about strict moderation on the ML, yet you are the main offender in violating the moderation edict. Tread carefully since the next moderation may not be limited to 72 hours.
> >
> > Vale,
> >
> > Gualterus
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79437 From: Leah Bernardo-Ciddio Date: 2010-08-18
Subject: Re: Patterns of patronage: The politics and ideology of public build
Salve, would you mind sending me a copy? This falls in with some of my own
research interests so it should be fascinating to read.

On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 11:01 PM, Robert Woolwine <robert.woolwine@...
> wrote:

>
>
> *Patterns of patronage: The politics and ideology of public building
> in the Eastern
> Roman Empire (31 BCE-600 CE)*
> by *Kalinowski, Angela Victoria* <javascript:void(0);>, Ph.D., University
> of
> Toronto (Canada), 1996 , 255 pages; AAT NQ35439
> Abstract (Summary)
>
> This thesis examines the private patronage of public building in selected
> cities of the *Eastern Roman Empire*, ca. 31 BCE to 600. It argues that the
> complex ideological and political meaning of public budding can be
> understood through the extension of a model of patron/client relations in
> Roman society which defines patronage as a reciprocal, non-commercial
> exchange of goods or services between people of different social status.
>
> Part One of the study demonstrates the usefulness of the model for
> examining
> the patterns of building patronage in early imperial Ephesos. The first
> chapter locates the ideological and political functions of the patronage of
> public building within the context of Roman patronage as a whole. Chapter
> Two uses epigraphic evidence to show that it was the local �lite who
> dominated public budding at Ephesos and describes the types of structures
> they built. Chapter Three analyses the placement, form and content of
> building-related inscriptions from Ephesos in order to reveal the political
> and ideological meanings and motivations behind the private finance of
> public building. Chapter Four presents a case study in the social and
> political uses of building, focusing on a series of buildings and
> inscriptions related to the activities of Marcus Claudius Publius Vedius
> Antoninus Phaedrus Sabinianus, a prominent citizen of mid-second century
> Ephesos.
>
> In Part Two, the model is extended to budding patronage in Late Antique
> Asia
> Minor. Chapter Five uses the inscriptions of Aphrodisias and Ephesos to
> show
> that there were two major shifts in the Patterns of patronage ca. 284-600.
> In the first phase of development, the patronage of public building was
> dominated by provincial governors. In the second, responsibility for the
> finance of civic structures returned to the local �lite. Chapter Six then
> analyses the language and content of building inscriptions in order to show
> that, despite these shifts in personnel, the ideological and political
> meaning of building remained remarkably constant from the first through
> sixth centuries CE.
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79438 From: Cato Date: 2010-08-18
Subject: Re: a Praetorial Warning & unfairness
Cato Piscino sal.

You're trying to turn this into a "boy-vs.-girl" thing - again. Perhaps you're trying to salvage some scrap of dignity, after having your attempt at destroying the civil authority of the Respublica squashed, by playing this red herring. It won't work.

The "women of NR" have repeatedly voiced their clear and unadulterated disgust at Maior and her tactics. You are not a woman so perhaps you should let them speak for themselves.

Maior resigned because she cannot control herself - and was found guilty of abusing her power by a Nova Roman court.

You don't know - nor should you know - if anyone of those whom you mentioned (and by the way, Enodia is a woman, so you calling her a "Back Alley Boy" is somewhat ludicrous) have been warned as well.

It was Maior who brought her private warning into the public eye.

Vale,

Cato



--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "marcushoratius" <MHoratius@...> wrote:
>
> M. Moravius Gualtero dicit
>
> You demonstrate precisely the prejudices of a minority group that has been harassing female sacerdotes and magistrates, which led to the loss of our Virgo Maxima, our CFO, and our Praetrices this year.
>
> How does saying "ROFL . . . dumb and dumber" compare to Enodia calling Maior "bitch"?
>
> How does a non-pornographic photo on another site compare to the one Sulla had on his list depicting Complutensis and Cordus double-banging Maior? And what of the electronic harassment conducted by Sulla against Maior, against Equestria, against the Virgo Maxima? Two of those women resigned because of the harassment they have received from this group in the Back Alley. Thanks to Sulla and his friends Nova Roma lost its CFO and its Virgo Maxima, and both of our Praetrices.
>
> What of Maior? She is made of stronger stuff, standing up to the harassment. And that is why she has become such a target for Sulla, his house-guest Metellus and the rest of the Back Alley Boys. So what do you do? Moderate her for defending herself even as you allow others to throw worse insults at her. Are you part of the moderation team that was set up to prevent this sort of conduct on our lists? Or are you part of those BABies who are attempting to drive more women away from Nova Roma?
>
> And since when is the term "idiot" so more offensive than Caesar saying Maior was detached from her brain? Is he alluding to beheading Maior for standing up to the abuse she and other women have received from his BAB friends? Did you warn him or any of these others for their persistent insults to our magistrates and sacerdotes?
>
> And why shouldn't Maior be upset when people are continually and unjustly insulting her even after the Censors issued a nota against Metellus for his gross insults against her? This has been a campaign of insults directed against the women of Nova Roma, and in my opinion it is a matter of idiocy on the part of the Senate, certain magistrates and their appointees like you who have condoned, permitted, and even joined in with these foul-mouthed, ill-mannered, disrepectful individuals who do nothing but spread their filth and encourage others to sexually harass women who actually work for Nova Roma. It is idiotic of the Albucius faction to allow this sort of behavior to continue when it has for so long been detrimintal to Nova Roma.
>
>
>
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "gualterus_graecus" <waltms1@> wrote:
> >
> > Salvete,
> >
> > Maior is obfuscating the facts.
> >
> > Firstly, Enodia's, Caesar's and Sulla's (79320) comments were part of the sensitive thread "Farewell, Nova Roma" for which a general warning was given. This thread included two posts where Maior insulted people by using the word "idiot" (79295, 79309). All of these instances were covered by my general warning in msg 79329.
> >
> > Sulla's concern about a pornographic image was sincere (#79357); I don't agree with the photo being pornographic, but everyone is free to voice a concern about Yahoo TOS issues.
> >
> > I asked everyone to remain civil in msg #79329, but who violated it, ignoring my general warning? Maior did in msg #79356 by claiming "this list consists of : dumb and dumber", which is what prompted the final warning. Part of what influenced the earnestness of the warning is that she has twice been moderated for uncivil behavior since the end of her magistracy, while at the same time being so vocal (in my view insincerely) about the importance of strict moderation on the ML.
> >
> > The situation is clear. Maior has in recent months been the most egregious violator of order on the ML. She should be relieved that the Praetura has been so tolerant and measured in its reactions.
> >
> > Valete,
> >
> > Gualterus Graecus
> > Praetorian Quaestor
> >
> > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "rory12001" <rory12001@> wrote:
> > >
> > > Salvete;
> > > I received this final warning today below. Wow, my words,after being abused so nastily on this list were quite mild.
> > >
> > > Talk about double standards. Gualterus did tell everyone, after the vituperative was over "we must remain civil"
> > > Right.
> > > valete
> > > M. Hortensia Maior
> > >
> > > "Go back to the Bitch Alley, Maior, and rot there with the rest of your garbage." Enodia
> > > "when has Maior ever let the truth interfere with what she believed?"
> > > " [conventus matronarum' You advertised your list, containing a potentially pornographic picture on
> > > your page" Sulla
> > > ", but it is divorced from a
> > > brain" Gn. Iulius Caesar
> > >
> > >
> > > Salve Maior,
> > >
> > > This is an official warning about your recent lack of control on the ML. I specifically refer to msg #79356 where you comment: "Rofl; just shows you what this list consists of : dumb and dumber." You know well your point could have been made in a non-inflammatory manner. You have been placed on moderation already twice before and this is a warning that if you do not get yourself under control then a third moderation will be forthcoming.
> > >
> > > I find your offences especially egregious since you have been so vocal about strict moderation on the ML, yet you are the main offender in violating the moderation edict. Tread carefully since the next moderation may not be limited to 72 hours.
> > >
> > > Vale,
> > >
> > > Gualterus
> > >
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79439 From: gualterus_graecus Date: 2010-08-18
Subject: Re: a Praetorial Warning & unfairness
Salve,

This entire post is nothing but drivel. You've combined unrelated and chronologically diverse events into an impossible scenario. Perhaps if you decided to indicate the dates of the events you mention and pay attention to the warnings that have been given on the ML you wouldn't post such nonsense... Perhaps.

Reread my post and pay closer attention to the post numbers. Maybe there will be a moment--a brief moment--in your fanatic streams of thought when you realize that you're mixing up long-ago events with things that happened post-Maior's-resignation. But, perhaps not.

You're not going to fool the people on this list.

Vale,

Gualterus

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "marcushoratius" <MHoratius@...> wrote:
>
> M. Moravius Gualtero dicit
>
> You demonstrate precisely the prejudices of a minority group that has been harassing female sacerdotes and magistrates, which led to the loss of our Virgo Maxima, our CFO, and our Praetrices this year.
>
> How does saying "ROFL . . . dumb and dumber" compare to Enodia calling Maior "bitch"?
>
> How does a non-pornographic photo on another site compare to the one Sulla had on his list depicting Complutensis and Cordus double-banging Maior? And what of the electronic harassment conducted by Sulla against Maior, against Equestria, against the Virgo Maxima? Two of those women resigned because of the harassment they have received from this group in the Back Alley. Thanks to Sulla and his friends Nova Roma lost its CFO and its Virgo Maxima, and both of our Praetrices.
>
> What of Maior? She is made of stronger stuff, standing up to the harassment. And that is why she has become such a target for Sulla, his house-guest Metellus and the rest of the Back Alley Boys. So what do you do? Moderate her for defending herself even as you allow others to throw worse insults at her. Are you part of the moderation team that was set up to prevent this sort of conduct on our lists? Or are you part of those BABies who are attempting to drive more women away from Nova Roma?
>
> And since when is the term "idiot" so more offensive than Caesar saying Maior was detached from her brain? Is he alluding to beheading Maior for standing up to the abuse she and other women have received from his BAB friends? Did you warn him or any of these others for their persistent insults to our magistrates and sacerdotes?
>
> And why shouldn't Maior be upset when people are continually and unjustly insulting her even after the Censors issued a nota against Metellus for his gross insults against her? This has been a campaign of insults directed against the women of Nova Roma, and in my opinion it is a matter of idiocy on the part of the Senate, certain magistrates and their appointees like you who have condoned, permitted, and even joined in with these foul-mouthed, ill-mannered, disrepectful individuals who do nothing but spread their filth and encourage others to sexually harass women who actually work for Nova Roma. It is idiotic of the Albucius faction to allow this sort of behavior to continue when it has for so long been detrimintal to Nova Roma.
>
>
>
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "gualterus_graecus" <waltms1@> wrote:
> >
> > Salvete,
> >
> > Maior is obfuscating the facts.
> >
> > Firstly, Enodia's, Caesar's and Sulla's (79320) comments were part of the sensitive thread "Farewell, Nova Roma" for which a general warning was given. This thread included two posts where Maior insulted people by using the word "idiot" (79295, 79309). All of these instances were covered by my general warning in msg 79329.
> >
> > Sulla's concern about a pornographic image was sincere (#79357); I don't agree with the photo being pornographic, but everyone is free to voice a concern about Yahoo TOS issues.
> >
> > I asked everyone to remain civil in msg #79329, but who violated it, ignoring my general warning? Maior did in msg #79356 by claiming "this list consists of : dumb and dumber", which is what prompted the final warning. Part of what influenced the earnestness of the warning is that she has twice been moderated for uncivil behavior since the end of her magistracy, while at the same time being so vocal (in my view insincerely) about the importance of strict moderation on the ML.
> >
> > The situation is clear. Maior has in recent months been the most egregious violator of order on the ML. She should be relieved that the Praetura has been so tolerant and measured in its reactions.
> >
> > Valete,
> >
> > Gualterus Graecus
> > Praetorian Quaestor
> >
> > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "rory12001" <rory12001@> wrote:
> > >
> > > Salvete;
> > > I received this final warning today below. Wow, my words,after being abused so nastily on this list were quite mild.
> > >
> > > Talk about double standards. Gualterus did tell everyone, after the vituperative was over "we must remain civil"
> > > Right.
> > > valete
> > > M. Hortensia Maior
> > >
> > > "Go back to the Bitch Alley, Maior, and rot there with the rest of your garbage." Enodia
> > > "when has Maior ever let the truth interfere with what she believed?"
> > > " [conventus matronarum' You advertised your list, containing a potentially pornographic picture on
> > > your page" Sulla
> > > ", but it is divorced from a
> > > brain" Gn. Iulius Caesar
> > >
> > >
> > > Salve Maior,
> > >
> > > This is an official warning about your recent lack of control on the ML. I specifically refer to msg #79356 where you comment: "Rofl; just shows you what this list consists of : dumb and dumber." You know well your point could have been made in a non-inflammatory manner. You have been placed on moderation already twice before and this is a warning that if you do not get yourself under control then a third moderation will be forthcoming.
> > >
> > > I find your offences especially egregious since you have been so vocal about strict moderation on the ML, yet you are the main offender in violating the moderation edict. Tread carefully since the next moderation may not be limited to 72 hours.
> > >
> > > Vale,
> > >
> > > Gualterus
> > >
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79440 From: M. Octavius Gracchus Date: 2010-08-18
Subject: Re: a Praetorial Warning & unfairness
Salve Piscine, self-appointed Protector of Womanly Virtue,

> which led to the loss of our Virgo Maxima, our CFO, and our Praetrices this year.

The Praetrices/CFO were "lost" because Maior constantly, repeatedly and
flagrantly abused her power to silence a long-time personal enemy, and was
rightfully slapped down for it by the one consul who wasn't sleeping on duty.

Moreover, Maior has a history of defiantly violating the rules of other mailing
lists she subscribed to - after having been banished from the Back Alley, she
resubscribed under another alias in order to spy upon the members and forward
their posts - openly defying the rules of that list - to this list and others,
to embarrass and harass their authors.

That you could put such an egregious person in charge of any mailing list is
astounding. Her "loss" is a very good thing; it's a pity her colleague, a good
person, got caught up in the fray.

As for the loss of the Virgo Maxima - wasn't the first "insult" to her, a year
or two ago, another one of those posts forwarded from a PRIVATE list by the
wicked Maior to demonstrate just how naughty her enemies were? Thank Maior for
that one as well.

Or maybe the Virgo couldn't continue in office because of the way she was used
by you and your co-conspirators last month in your illegal and failed attempt to
appoint a dictator. You really threw her under the bus, didn't you?

> And why shouldn't Maior be upset when people are continually and unjustly > insulting her even after the Censors issued a nota against Metellus

Ha! Do you *really* think that "Nota" is worth any more than a cup of warm
urine? The Censores, one of whom is in office illegally, did nothing more than
make themselves a laughingstock with this ridiculous nota. If you think that
the nota, and your own slimy followup to it (in which you seized upon it as
justification for driving yet *another* of your enemies from the Collegium
Pontificum - convenient, that!) are going to get the rest of us to *respect* you
and Maior, you're more delusional than I thought.

No, the Nota only gives us more cause to despise you and your sycophantic
lackeys. We will not acquiesce, we will not surrender, we will not turn down
the pressure, until this Nota is stricken from the records, until you and your
cronies have been banished to the outer darkness, and DAMNATIO MEMORIAE
pronounced against you and everything you have done.

>It is idiotic of the Albucius faction

"Albucius faction"?

Albucius is not part of any "faction" but his own. You're deluded, old man.

Or perhaps you can't resist the urge to slander the one consul with the courage
to stand up to your gross abuse of your office, by linking him to everything
under the sun.

Albucius did not insult Maior, he is not a BackAlley subscriber; all he's done
is try to clean up the mess that Maior made when she befouled her office; the
worst Praetrix Nova Roma has ever had.

But I guess everyone who is against you must be a member of the same "faction"
in your warped, hateful little mind.

You, false priest, are in no position to lecture anyone about driving people
away from Nova Roma. You are the immediate cause of the departures of the
Founders. Pater Patriae Marcus Cassius Iulianus, the true Pontifex Maximus, is
no longer here because of you. Senatrix Patricia Cassia is no longer here
because of you. Lucius Equitius Cincinnatus AUGUR, the last true Augur Nova
Roma has had, is no longer here because of you. The web site is unsupported by
its creator, me, because of YOU ($10,000 to fix - ka-ching!)

You obsess over the mote in your neighbour's eye while ignoring the plank in
your own. You drove away our leading citizens, and now are in a fury about
someone being rude to your lap-dog.

I think the women of Nova Roma are quite capable of defending themselves, and
don't need you as their self-appointed protector.

M. Octavius Gracchus,
ex-citizen,
standing with the victims of Piscinus since 2008.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79441 From: Publius Memmius Albucius Date: 2010-08-18
Subject: Appointment of two praetors
Consular edict on the appointment of two praetores suffecti


(de designatione praetorum suffectorum duorum)




In view of the senatus consultum ultimum of Kal. Aug. 2763 auc (Aug 1, 2010), asking the consul maior �to fill himself, by derogation of the article IV.A.5 of the Constitution, the

currently vacant magistracies of praetors� ;




Taking in due consideration the article 2 of this senatus consultum ultimum which rules that �This appointment shall respect the order stated by Diribitor Arminius on pr. Nonas Quint.

2763 (July 6, 2010 - see attached) acting in the frame of the last Comitia centuriata finally declared void for absence of previous selection of a centuria praerogativa, which is :



A. Tullia Scholastica or P. Ullerius Venator

A. Tullia Scholastica or P. Ullerius Venator

Ti. Galerius Paulinus

Q. Fabius Maximus

being reminded that former candidate M. Hortensia Maior cannot, by judicial sentence, hold any office and magistracy until next Kal. Ian. 2764 auc. �







I, Publius Memmius Albucius, consul, by the authority vested by the constitution, the laws and the Senate of Nova Roma, edict :



Article 1

P. Ullerius Venator and A. Tullia Scholastica are appointed, respectively, praetor maior and praetrix minor suffecti, with the full constitutional powers of praetors.

If, for any reason, one or both praetors would not received the imperium normally granted by a duly convened session of the Comitia curiata yet to be called, the

consul maior would place immediately his imperium at the service of the concerned praetor(s).





Article 2

The term of both praetors suffecti begins on next Kal. Sept. 2763 auc. (Sep. 1st, 2010) and will end at the normal annual end of the term, on next pridie Kal. Ian. 2764


auc (Dec. 31, 2010).


Article 3
The execution of the present edict, and therefore the entry in office of both Ullerius and Tullia, shall be materially postponed, from the publication of this edict on and until the end of the 72 hours legal intercession period, open to the consul minor, according the Constitution and recalled by the senatus consultum ultimum above mentioned. In case of such legally thrown intercession, the present edict shall be void and the consul maior would inform the Senate of the situation and ask its advice.

Article 4
The present text shall be published in the Tabularium Novae Romae and in Nova Roma relevant internet 'discussion' lists, as well as notified to P. Ullerius Venator and A. Tullia Scholastica.

Scripto Condate Scaldi Galliae,, a.d. XV Kal. Sep.MMDCCLXIII a.u.c. (18 th Aug. 2010 c.c.) P. Memmio Albucio C. Fabio Buteone Quintiliano iterum coss..




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79442 From: James Hooper Date: 2010-08-18
Subject: Re: Latin classes: last call for Grammatica Latina
Salve,
Forgive me, I meant that to inform the other gentleman who ask if the
class was given through the acadamy. Sorry for the confusion I should have
sent it to him directly.

C.Pompeius Marcellus


On Wed, 18 Aug 2010 00:14:40 -0400
"A. Tullia Scholastica" <fororom@...> wrote:
>>
>> A. Tullia Scholastica C. Pompeio Marcello quiritibus, sociis, peregrinisque
>> bonae voluntatis S.P.D.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Forgive my interuption, The text book in question Wheellock, is in stock at
>> Amazon.
>> C. Pomepius Marcellus
>>
>>
>>
>> ATS: I¹m not sure whether you are making a statement or asking a
>>question
>> here, but the Wheelock text should be available on Amazon as well as from
>>the
>> Wheelock site and from many college bookstores in English-speaking (and
>>other)
>> countries.
>>
>>
>> Vale, et valete.
>>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, 16 Aug 2010 22:55:39 -0400
>> "A. Tullia Scholastica" <fororom@...
>><mailto:fororom%40localnet.com>
>> > wrote:
>>>> >>
>>>> >>
>>>> >> A. Tullia Scholastica P. Corvae Gaudiali quiritibus, sociis,
>>>> peregrinisque
>>>> >> bonae voluntatis S.P.D.
>>>> >>
>>>> >>
>>>> >> P. Corva Gaudialis A. Tulliae Scholasticae sal.
>>>> >>
>>>> >> Salve!
>>>> >>
>>>> >> How do I register for this?
>>>> >>
>>>> >> ATS: I will provide the information when you inform me that you have
>>>> >>the
>>>> >> textbook, and verify that with me. I have to check to make sure that the
>>>> >> student actually has the text, for the homework is found only there.
>>>> >>
>>>> >>
>>>> >> Is it offered through the Academia Thules?
>>>> >>
>>>> >> ATS: No, unfortunately the Academia Thules no longer exists. Their
>>>> >> course server died in early November of 2008, and it has not been
>>>> repaired
>>>> >>or
>>>> >> replaced.
>>>> >>
>>>> >> Paulla
>>>> >>
>>>> >> Vale, et valete.
>>>> >>
>>>> >>
>>>> >>
>>>> >> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com <mailto:Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com>
>>>> <mailto:Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com> , "A.
>>>> >> Tullia Scholastica" <flavia@...> wrote:
>>>>>> >>> >
>>>>>> >>> > A. Tullia Scholastica quiritibus tironibus sociis peregrinisque
> bonae
>>>>>> >>> > voluntatis S.P.D.
>>>>>> >>> >
>>>>>> >>> > Time is getting short to register for our Grammatica Latina
>>>>>> classes in
>>>>>> >>> > particular, for Grammatica I will begin on Monday, September 6th,
>>>> >>
>>>> >> (snipped)
>>>> >>
>>>> >>
>>>> >>
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>>> >
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79443 From: James Hooper Date: 2010-08-18
Subject: Re: a Praetorial Warning & unfairness
Salve Citizens,
Having read enough of this. Please I beg you to let Blessed
Concordia rule in this matter. If a member has performed badly and draws
controversy to him/her self, let the matter be solved without the gutter
langauge I have read in this matter. Dominus et Domina, let us act like Romans
and not like barbarians.
C. Pompeius Marcellus


On Wed, 18 Aug 2010 12:32:43 -0000
"Cato" <catoinnyc@...> wrote:
> Cato Piscino sal.
>
> You're trying to turn this into a "boy-vs.-girl" thing - again. Perhaps
>you're trying to salvage some scrap of dignity, after having your attempt at
>destroying the civil authority of the Respublica squashed, by playing this
>red herring. It won't work.
>
> The "women of NR" have repeatedly voiced their clear and unadulterated
>disgust at Maior and her tactics. You are not a woman so perhaps you should
>let them speak for themselves.
>
> Maior resigned because she cannot control herself - and was found guilty of
>abusing her power by a Nova Roman court.
>
> You don't know - nor should you know - if anyone of those whom you mentioned
>(and by the way, Enodia is a woman, so you calling her a "Back Alley Boy" is
>somewhat ludicrous) have been warned as well.
>
> It was Maior who brought her private warning into the public eye.
>
> Vale,
>
> Cato
>
>
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "marcushoratius" <MHoratius@...> wrote:
>>
>> M. Moravius Gualtero dicit
>>
>> You demonstrate precisely the prejudices of a minority group that has been
>>harassing female sacerdotes and magistrates, which led to the loss of our
>>Virgo Maxima, our CFO, and our Praetrices this year.
>>
>> How does saying "ROFL . . . dumb and dumber" compare to Enodia calling Maior
>>"bitch"?
>>
>> How does a non-pornographic photo on another site compare to the one Sulla
>>had on his list depicting Complutensis and Cordus double-banging Maior? And
>>what of the electronic harassment conducted by Sulla against Maior, against
>>Equestria, against the Virgo Maxima? Two of those women resigned because of
>>the harassment they have received from this group in the Back Alley. Thanks
>>to Sulla and his friends Nova Roma lost its CFO and its Virgo Maxima, and
>>both of our Praetrices.
>>
>> What of Maior? She is made of stronger stuff, standing up to the
>>harassment. And that is why she has become such a target for Sulla, his
>>house-guest Metellus and the rest of the Back Alley Boys. So what do you do?
>>Moderate her for defending herself even as you allow others to throw worse
>>insults at her. Are you part of the moderation team that was set up to
>>prevent this sort of conduct on our lists? Or are you part of those BABies
>>who are attempting to drive more women away from Nova Roma?
>>
>> And since when is the term "idiot" so more offensive than Caesar saying
>>Maior was detached from her brain? Is he alluding to beheading Maior for
>>standing up to the abuse she and other women have received from his BAB
>>friends? Did you warn him or any of these others for their persistent
>>insults to our magistrates and sacerdotes?
>>
>> And why shouldn't Maior be upset when people are continually and unjustly
>>insulting her even after the Censors issued a nota against Metellus for his
>>gross insults against her? This has been a campaign of insults directed
>>against the women of Nova Roma, and in my opinion it is a matter of idiocy on
>>the part of the Senate, certain magistrates and their appointees like you who
>>have condoned, permitted, and even joined in with these foul-mouthed,
>>ill-mannered, disrepectful individuals who do nothing but spread their filth
>>and encourage others to sexually harass women who actually work for Nova
>>Roma. It is idiotic of the Albucius faction to allow this sort of behavior to
>>continue when it has for so long been detrimintal to Nova Roma.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "gualterus_graecus" <waltms1@> wrote:
>> >
>> > Salvete,
>> >
>> > Maior is obfuscating the facts.
>> >
>> > Firstly, Enodia's, Caesar's and Sulla's (79320) comments were part of the
>>sensitive thread "Farewell, Nova Roma" for which a general warning was given.
>>This thread included two posts where Maior insulted people by using the word
>>"idiot" (79295, 79309). All of these instances were covered by my general
>>warning in msg 79329.
>> >
>> > Sulla's concern about a pornographic image was sincere (#79357); I don't
>>agree with the photo being pornographic, but everyone is free to voice a
>>concern about Yahoo TOS issues.
>> >
>> > I asked everyone to remain civil in msg #79329, but who violated it,
>>ignoring my general warning? Maior did in msg #79356 by claiming "this list
>>consists of : dumb and dumber", which is what prompted the final warning.
>>Part of what influenced the earnestness of the warning is that she has twice
>>been moderated for uncivil behavior since the end of her magistracy, while at
>>the same time being so vocal (in my view insincerely) about the importance of
>>strict moderation on the ML.
>> >
>> > The situation is clear. Maior has in recent months been the most egregious
>>violator of order on the ML. She should be relieved that the Praetura has
>>been so tolerant and measured in its reactions.
>> >
>> > Valete,
>> >
>> > Gualterus Graecus
>> > Praetorian Quaestor
>> >
>> > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "rory12001" <rory12001@> wrote:
>> > >
>> > > Salvete;
>> > > I received this final warning today below. Wow, my words,after being
>>abused so nastily on this list were quite mild.
>> > >
>> > > Talk about double standards. Gualterus did tell everyone, after the
>>vituperative was over "we must remain civil"
>> > > Right.
>> > > valete
>> > > M. Hortensia Maior
>> > >
>> > > "Go back to the Bitch Alley, Maior, and rot there with the rest of your
>>garbage." Enodia
>> > > "when has Maior ever let the truth interfere with what she believed?"
>> > > " [conventus matronarum' You advertised your list, containing a
>>potentially pornographic picture on
>> > > your page" Sulla
>> > > ", but it is divorced from a
>> > > brain" Gn. Iulius Caesar
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > Salve Maior,
>> > >
>> > > This is an official warning about your recent lack of control on the ML.
>>I specifically refer to msg #79356 where you comment: "Rofl; just shows you
>>what this list consists of : dumb and dumber." You know well your point could
>>have been made in a non-inflammatory manner. You have been placed on
>>moderation already twice before and this is a warning that if you do not get
>>yourself under control then a third moderation will be forthcoming.
>> > >
>> > > I find your offences especially egregious since you have been so vocal
>>about strict moderation on the ML, yet you are the main offender in violating
>>the moderation edict. Tread carefully since the next moderation may not be
>>limited to 72 hours.
>> > >
>> > > Vale,
>> > >
>> > > Gualterus
>> > >
>> >
>>
>
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79444 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2010-08-18
Subject: Re: a Praetorial Warning & unfairness
We are acting like Romans! Romans argued, disagreed and had strong
political feelings. We are acting like REPUBLICAN ROMANS.

Since you brought it up, how do Barbarians act?

Vale,

Sulla

On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 7:39 AM, James Hooper <warrior44_us@...>wrote:

>
>
> Salve Citizens,
> Having read enough of this. Please I beg you to let Blessed
> Concordia rule in this matter. If a member has performed badly and draws
> controversy to him/her self, let the matter be solved without the gutter
> langauge I have read in this matter. Dominus et Domina, let us act like
> Romans
> and not like barbarians.
> C. Pompeius Marcellus
>
>
> On Wed, 18 Aug 2010 12:32:43 -0000
> "Cato" <catoinnyc@... <catoinnyc%40gmail.com>> wrote:
> > Cato Piscino sal.
> >
> > You're trying to turn this into a "boy-vs.-girl" thing - again. Perhaps
> >you're trying to salvage some scrap of dignity, after having your attempt
> at
> >destroying the civil authority of the Respublica squashed, by playing this
>
> >red herring. It won't work.
> >
> > The "women of NR" have repeatedly voiced their clear and unadulterated
> >disgust at Maior and her tactics. You are not a woman so perhaps you
> should
> >let them speak for themselves.
> >
> > Maior resigned because she cannot control herself - and was found guilty
> of
> >abusing her power by a Nova Roman court.
> >
> > You don't know - nor should you know - if anyone of those whom you
> mentioned
> >(and by the way, Enodia is a woman, so you calling her a "Back Alley Boy"
> is
> >somewhat ludicrous) have been warned as well.
> >
> > It was Maior who brought her private warning into the public eye.
> >
> > Vale,
> >
> > Cato
> >
> >
> >
> > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com <Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com>,
> "marcushoratius" <MHoratius@...> wrote:
> >>
> >> M. Moravius Gualtero dicit
> >>
> >> You demonstrate precisely the prejudices of a minority group that has
> been
> >>harassing female sacerdotes and magistrates, which led to the loss of our
>
> >>Virgo Maxima, our CFO, and our Praetrices this year.
> >>
> >> How does saying "ROFL . . . dumb and dumber" compare to Enodia calling
> Maior
> >>"bitch"?
> >>
> >> How does a non-pornographic photo on another site compare to the one
> Sulla
> >>had on his list depicting Complutensis and Cordus double-banging Maior?
> And
> >>what of the electronic harassment conducted by Sulla against Maior,
> against
> >>Equestria, against the Virgo Maxima? Two of those women resigned because
> of
> >>the harassment they have received from this group in the Back Alley.
> Thanks
> >>to Sulla and his friends Nova Roma lost its CFO and its Virgo Maxima, and
>
> >>both of our Praetrices.
> >>
> >> What of Maior? She is made of stronger stuff, standing up to the
> >>harassment. And that is why she has become such a target for Sulla, his
> >>house-guest Metellus and the rest of the Back Alley Boys. So what do you
> do?
> >>Moderate her for defending herself even as you allow others to throw
> worse
> >>insults at her. Are you part of the moderation team that was set up to
> >>prevent this sort of conduct on our lists? Or are you part of those
> BABies
> >>who are attempting to drive more women away from Nova Roma?
> >>
> >> And since when is the term "idiot" so more offensive than Caesar saying
> >>Maior was detached from her brain? Is he alluding to beheading Maior for
> >>standing up to the abuse she and other women have received from his BAB
> >>friends? Did you warn him or any of these others for their persistent
> >>insults to our magistrates and sacerdotes?
> >>
> >> And why shouldn't Maior be upset when people are continually and
> unjustly
> >>insulting her even after the Censors issued a nota against Metellus for
> his
> >>gross insults against her? This has been a campaign of insults directed
> >>against the women of Nova Roma, and in my opinion it is a matter of
> idiocy on
> >>the part of the Senate, certain magistrates and their appointees like you
> who
> >>have condoned, permitted, and even joined in with these foul-mouthed,
> >>ill-mannered, disrepectful individuals who do nothing but spread their
> filth
> >>and encourage others to sexually harass women who actually work for Nova
> >>Roma. It is idiotic of the Albucius faction to allow this sort of
> behavior to
> >>continue when it has for so long been detrimintal to Nova Roma.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com <Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com>,
> "gualterus_graecus" <waltms1@> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > Salvete,
> >> >
> >> > Maior is obfuscating the facts.
> >> >
> >> > Firstly, Enodia's, Caesar's and Sulla's (79320) comments were part of
> the
> >>sensitive thread "Farewell, Nova Roma" for which a general warning was
> given.
> >>This thread included two posts where Maior insulted people by using the
> word
> >>"idiot" (79295, 79309). All of these instances were covered by my general
>
> >>warning in msg 79329.
> >> >
> >> > Sulla's concern about a pornographic image was sincere (#79357); I
> don't
> >>agree with the photo being pornographic, but everyone is free to voice a
> >>concern about Yahoo TOS issues.
> >> >
> >> > I asked everyone to remain civil in msg #79329, but who violated it,
> >>ignoring my general warning? Maior did in msg #79356 by claiming "this
> list
> >>consists of : dumb and dumber", which is what prompted the final warning.
>
> >>Part of what influenced the earnestness of the warning is that she has
> twice
> >>been moderated for uncivil behavior since the end of her magistracy,
> while at
> >>the same time being so vocal (in my view insincerely) about the
> importance of
> >>strict moderation on the ML.
> >> >
> >> > The situation is clear. Maior has in recent months been the most
> egregious
> >>violator of order on the ML. She should be relieved that the Praetura has
>
> >>been so tolerant and measured in its reactions.
> >> >
> >> > Valete,
> >> >
> >> > Gualterus Graecus
> >> > Praetorian Quaestor
> >> >
> >> > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com <Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com>,
> "rory12001" <rory12001@> wrote:
> >> > >
> >> > > Salvete;
> >> > > I received this final warning today below. Wow, my words,after being
>
> >>abused so nastily on this list were quite mild.
> >> > >
> >> > > Talk about double standards. Gualterus did tell everyone, after the
> >>vituperative was over "we must remain civil"
> >> > > Right.
> >> > > valete
> >> > > M. Hortensia Maior
> >> > >
> >> > > "Go back to the Bitch Alley, Maior, and rot there with the rest of
> your
> >>garbage." Enodia
> >> > > "when has Maior ever let the truth interfere with what she
> believed?"
> >> > > " [conventus matronarum' You advertised your list, containing a
> >>potentially pornographic picture on
> >> > > your page" Sulla
> >> > > ", but it is divorced from a
> >> > > brain" Gn. Iulius Caesar
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > > Salve Maior,
> >> > >
> >> > > This is an official warning about your recent lack of control on the
> ML.
> >>I specifically refer to msg #79356 where you comment: "Rofl; just shows
> you
> >>what this list consists of : dumb and dumber." You know well your point
> could
> >>have been made in a non-inflammatory manner. You have been placed on
> >>moderation already twice before and this is a warning that if you do not
> get
> >>yourself under control then a third moderation will be forthcoming.
> >> > >
> >> > > I find your offences especially egregious since you have been so
> vocal
> >>about strict moderation on the ML, yet you are the main offender in
> violating
> >>the moderation edict. Tread carefully since the next moderation may not
> be
> >>limited to 72 hours.
> >> > >
> >> > > Vale,
> >> > >
> >> > > Gualterus
> >> > >
> >> >
> >>
> >
> >
>
>
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79445 From: James Hooper Date: 2010-08-18
Subject: Re: a Praetorial Warning & unfairness
Salve,
Barbarians do much the same I'm afraid. As much as I've read about the so
called "savages." The point I wa trying to make was to hace civility on the ML
not the name calling. I know that Romans were very passionate about their
politics especially in the republican era. Forgive me if I offended.
Vale,
C. Pomeius Marcellus


On Wed, 18 Aug 2010 07:50:41 -0700
Robert Woolwine <robert.woolwine@...> wrote:
> We are acting like Romans! Romans argued, disagreed and had strong
> political feelings. We are acting like REPUBLICAN ROMANS.
>
> Since you brought it up, how do Barbarians act?
>
> Vale,
>
> Sulla
>
> On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 7:39 AM, James Hooper
><warrior44_us@...>wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> Salve Citizens,
>> Having read enough of this. Please I beg you to let Blessed
>> Concordia rule in this matter. If a member has performed badly and draws
>> controversy to him/her self, let the matter be solved without the gutter
>> langauge I have read in this matter. Dominus et Domina, let us act like
>> Romans
>> and not like barbarians.
>> C. Pompeius Marcellus
>>
>>
>> On Wed, 18 Aug 2010 12:32:43 -0000
>> "Cato" <catoinnyc@... <catoinnyc%40gmail.com>> wrote:
>> > Cato Piscino sal.
>> >
>> > You're trying to turn this into a "boy-vs.-girl" thing - again. Perhaps
>> >you're trying to salvage some scrap of dignity, after having your attempt
>> at
>> >destroying the civil authority of the Respublica squashed, by playing this
>>
>> >red herring. It won't work.
>> >
>> > The "women of NR" have repeatedly voiced their clear and unadulterated
>> >disgust at Maior and her tactics. You are not a woman so perhaps you
>> should
>> >let them speak for themselves.
>> >
>> > Maior resigned because she cannot control herself - and was found guilty
>> of
>> >abusing her power by a Nova Roman court.
>> >
>> > You don't know - nor should you know - if anyone of those whom you
>> mentioned
>> >(and by the way, Enodia is a woman, so you calling her a "Back Alley Boy"
>> is
>> >somewhat ludicrous) have been warned as well.
>> >
>> > It was Maior who brought her private warning into the public eye.
>> >
>> > Vale,
>> >
>> > Cato
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com <Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com>,
>> "marcushoratius" <MHoratius@...> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> M. Moravius Gualtero dicit
>> >>
>> >> You demonstrate precisely the prejudices of a minority group that has
>> been
>> >>harassing female sacerdotes and magistrates, which led to the loss of our
>>
>> >>Virgo Maxima, our CFO, and our Praetrices this year.
>> >>
>> >> How does saying "ROFL . . . dumb and dumber" compare to Enodia calling
>> Maior
>> >>"bitch"?
>> >>
>> >> How does a non-pornographic photo on another site compare to the one
>> Sulla
>> >>had on his list depicting Complutensis and Cordus double-banging Maior?
>> And
>> >>what of the electronic harassment conducted by Sulla against Maior,
>> against
>> >>Equestria, against the Virgo Maxima? Two of those women resigned because
>> of
>> >>the harassment they have received from this group in the Back Alley.
>> Thanks
>> >>to Sulla and his friends Nova Roma lost its CFO and its Virgo Maxima, and
>>
>> >>both of our Praetrices.
>> >>
>> >> What of Maior? She is made of stronger stuff, standing up to the
>> >>harassment. And that is why she has become such a target for Sulla, his
>> >>house-guest Metellus and the rest of the Back Alley Boys. So what do you
>> do?
>> >>Moderate her for defending herself even as you allow others to throw
>> worse
>> >>insults at her. Are you part of the moderation team that was set up to
>> >>prevent this sort of conduct on our lists? Or are you part of those
>> BABies
>> >>who are attempting to drive more women away from Nova Roma?
>> >>
>> >> And since when is the term "idiot" so more offensive than Caesar saying
>> >>Maior was detached from her brain? Is he alluding to beheading Maior for
>> >>standing up to the abuse she and other women have received from his BAB
>> >>friends? Did you warn him or any of these others for their persistent
>> >>insults to our magistrates and sacerdotes?
>> >>
>> >> And why shouldn't Maior be upset when people are continually and
>> unjustly
>> >>insulting her even after the Censors issued a nota against Metellus for
>> his
>> >>gross insults against her? This has been a campaign of insults directed
>> >>against the women of Nova Roma, and in my opinion it is a matter of
>> idiocy on
>> >>the part of the Senate, certain magistrates and their appointees like you
>> who
>> >>have condoned, permitted, and even joined in with these foul-mouthed,
>> >>ill-mannered, disrepectful individuals who do nothing but spread their
>> filth
>> >>and encourage others to sexually harass women who actually work for Nova
>> >>Roma. It is idiotic of the Albucius faction to allow this sort of
>> behavior to
>> >>continue when it has for so long been detrimintal to Nova Roma.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com <Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com>,
>> "gualterus_graecus" <waltms1@> wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> > Salvete,
>> >> >
>> >> > Maior is obfuscating the facts.
>> >> >
>> >> > Firstly, Enodia's, Caesar's and Sulla's (79320) comments were part of
>> the
>> >>sensitive thread "Farewell, Nova Roma" for which a general warning was
>> given.
>> >>This thread included two posts where Maior insulted people by using the
>> word
>> >>"idiot" (79295, 79309). All of these instances were covered by my general
>>
>> >>warning in msg 79329.
>> >> >
>> >> > Sulla's concern about a pornographic image was sincere (#79357); I
>> don't
>> >>agree with the photo being pornographic, but everyone is free to voice a
>> >>concern about Yahoo TOS issues.
>> >> >
>> >> > I asked everyone to remain civil in msg #79329, but who violated it,
>> >>ignoring my general warning? Maior did in msg #79356 by claiming "this
>> list
>> >>consists of : dumb and dumber", which is what prompted the final warning.
>>
>> >>Part of what influenced the earnestness of the warning is that she has
>> twice
>> >>been moderated for uncivil behavior since the end of her magistracy,
>> while at
>> >>the same time being so vocal (in my view insincerely) about the
>> importance of
>> >>strict moderation on the ML.
>> >> >
>> >> > The situation is clear. Maior has in recent months been the most
>> egregious
>> >>violator of order on the ML. She should be relieved that the Praetura has
>>
>> >>been so tolerant and measured in its reactions.
>> >> >
>> >> > Valete,
>> >> >
>> >> > Gualterus Graecus
>> >> > Praetorian Quaestor
>> >> >
>> >> > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com <Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com>,
>> "rory12001" <rory12001@> wrote:
>> >> > >
>> >> > > Salvete;
>> >> > > I received this final warning today below. Wow, my words,after being
>>
>> >>abused so nastily on this list were quite mild.
>> >> > >
>> >> > > Talk about double standards. Gualterus did tell everyone, after the
>> >>vituperative was over "we must remain civil"
>> >> > > Right.
>> >> > > valete
>> >> > > M. Hortensia Maior
>> >> > >
>> >> > > "Go back to the Bitch Alley, Maior, and rot there with the rest of
>> your
>> >>garbage." Enodia
>> >> > > "when has Maior ever let the truth interfere with what she
>> believed?"
>> >> > > " [conventus matronarum' You advertised your list, containing a
>> >>potentially pornographic picture on
>> >> > > your page" Sulla
>> >> > > ", but it is divorced from a
>> >> > > brain" Gn. Iulius Caesar
>> >> > >
>> >> > >
>> >> > > Salve Maior,
>> >> > >
>> >> > > This is an official warning about your recent lack of control on the
>> ML.
>> >>I specifically refer to msg #79356 where you comment: "Rofl; just shows
>> you
>> >>what this list consists of : dumb and dumber." You know well your point
>> could
>> >>have been made in a non-inflammatory manner. You have been placed on
>> >>moderation already twice before and this is a warning that if you do not
>> get
>> >>yourself under control then a third moderation will be forthcoming.
>> >> > >
>> >> > > I find your offences especially egregious since you have been so
>> vocal
>> >>about strict moderation on the ML, yet you are the main offender in
>> violating
>> >>the moderation edict. Tread carefully since the next moderation may not
>> be
>> >>limited to 72 hours.
>> >> > >
>> >> > > Vale,
>> >> > >
>> >> > > Gualterus
>> >> > >
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79446 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2010-08-18
Subject: Re: a Praetorial Warning & unfairness
Ave,

No offense at all. :) Just making a point.

I just am trying to stay away from those strawman arguments of Romans vs
Barbarians. It is in similar in vein as those that act like McCarthy and
others in the House UnAmerican Activities Committee when they ask just what
have you done for NR? It is a strawman and we should strive to be better
than to rely on strawman arguments.

Vale,

Sulla

On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 8:15 AM, James Hooper <warrior44_us@...>wrote:

>
>
> Salve,
> Barbarians do much the same I'm afraid. As much as I've read about the so
> called "savages." The point I wa trying to make was to hace civility on the
> ML
> not the name calling. I know that Romans were very passionate about their
> politics especially in the republican era. Forgive me if I offended.
> Vale,
> C. Pomeius Marcellus
>
>
> On Wed, 18 Aug 2010 07:50:41 -0700
> Robert Woolwine <robert.woolwine@... <robert.woolwine%40gmail.com>>
> wrote:
> > We are acting like Romans! Romans argued, disagreed and had strong
> > political feelings. We are acting like REPUBLICAN ROMANS.
> >
> > Since you brought it up, how do Barbarians act?
> >
> > Vale,
> >
> > Sulla
> >
> > On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 7:39 AM, James Hooper
> ><warrior44_us@... <warrior44_us%40bresnan.net>>wrote:
> >
> >>
> >>
> >> Salve Citizens,
> >> Having read enough of this. Please I beg you to let Blessed
> >> Concordia rule in this matter. If a member has performed badly and draws
> >> controversy to him/her self, let the matter be solved without the gutter
> >> langauge I have read in this matter. Dominus et Domina, let us act like
> >> Romans
> >> and not like barbarians.
> >> C. Pompeius Marcellus
> >>
> >>
> >> On Wed, 18 Aug 2010 12:32:43 -0000
> >> "Cato" <catoinnyc@... <catoinnyc%40gmail.com> <catoinnyc%
> 40gmail.com>> wrote:
> >> > Cato Piscino sal.
> >> >
> >> > You're trying to turn this into a "boy-vs.-girl" thing - again.
> Perhaps
> >> >you're trying to salvage some scrap of dignity, after having your
> attempt
> >> at
> >> >destroying the civil authority of the Respublica squashed, by playing
> this
> >>
> >> >red herring. It won't work.
> >> >
> >> > The "women of NR" have repeatedly voiced their clear and unadulterated
> >> >disgust at Maior and her tactics. You are not a woman so perhaps you
> >> should
> >> >let them speak for themselves.
> >> >
> >> > Maior resigned because she cannot control herself - and was found
> guilty
> >> of
> >> >abusing her power by a Nova Roman court.
> >> >
> >> > You don't know - nor should you know - if anyone of those whom you
> >> mentioned
> >> >(and by the way, Enodia is a woman, so you calling her a "Back Alley
> Boy"
> >> is
> >> >somewhat ludicrous) have been warned as well.
> >> >
> >> > It was Maior who brought her private warning into the public eye.
> >> >
> >> > Vale,
> >> >
> >> > Cato
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com <Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com><Nova-Roma%
> 40yahoogroups.com>,
>
> >> "marcushoratius" <MHoratius@...> wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> M. Moravius Gualtero dicit
> >> >>
> >> >> You demonstrate precisely the prejudices of a minority group that has
> >> been
> >> >>harassing female sacerdotes and magistrates, which led to the loss of
> our
> >>
> >> >>Virgo Maxima, our CFO, and our Praetrices this year.
> >> >>
> >> >> How does saying "ROFL . . . dumb and dumber" compare to Enodia
> calling
> >> Maior
> >> >>"bitch"?
> >> >>
> >> >> How does a non-pornographic photo on another site compare to the one
> >> Sulla
> >> >>had on his list depicting Complutensis and Cordus double-banging
> Maior?
> >> And
> >> >>what of the electronic harassment conducted by Sulla against Maior,
> >> against
> >> >>Equestria, against the Virgo Maxima? Two of those women resigned
> because
> >> of
> >> >>the harassment they have received from this group in the Back Alley.
> >> Thanks
> >> >>to Sulla and his friends Nova Roma lost its CFO and its Virgo Maxima,
> and
> >>
> >> >>both of our Praetrices.
> >> >>
> >> >> What of Maior? She is made of stronger stuff, standing up to the
> >> >>harassment. And that is why she has become such a target for Sulla,
> his
> >> >>house-guest Metellus and the rest of the Back Alley Boys. So what do
> you
> >> do?
> >> >>Moderate her for defending herself even as you allow others to throw
> >> worse
> >> >>insults at her. Are you part of the moderation team that was set up to
> >> >>prevent this sort of conduct on our lists? Or are you part of those
> >> BABies
> >> >>who are attempting to drive more women away from Nova Roma?
> >> >>
> >> >> And since when is the term "idiot" so more offensive than Caesar
> saying
> >> >>Maior was detached from her brain? Is he alluding to beheading Maior
> for
> >> >>standing up to the abuse she and other women have received from his
> BAB
> >> >>friends? Did you warn him or any of these others for their persistent
> >> >>insults to our magistrates and sacerdotes?
> >> >>
> >> >> And why shouldn't Maior be upset when people are continually and
> >> unjustly
> >> >>insulting her even after the Censors issued a nota against Metellus
> for
> >> his
> >> >>gross insults against her? This has been a campaign of insults
> directed
> >> >>against the women of Nova Roma, and in my opinion it is a matter of
> >> idiocy on
> >> >>the part of the Senate, certain magistrates and their appointees like
> you
> >> who
> >> >>have condoned, permitted, and even joined in with these foul-mouthed,
> >> >>ill-mannered, disrepectful individuals who do nothing but spread their
> >> filth
> >> >>and encourage others to sexually harass women who actually work for
> Nova
> >> >>Roma. It is idiotic of the Albucius faction to allow this sort of
> >> behavior to
> >> >>continue when it has for so long been detrimintal to Nova Roma.
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com <Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com><Nova-Roma%
> 40yahoogroups.com>,
>
> >> "gualterus_graecus" <waltms1@> wrote:
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Salvete,
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Maior is obfuscating the facts.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Firstly, Enodia's, Caesar's and Sulla's (79320) comments were part
> of
> >> the
> >> >>sensitive thread "Farewell, Nova Roma" for which a general warning was
> >> given.
> >> >>This thread included two posts where Maior insulted people by using
> the
> >> word
> >> >>"idiot" (79295, 79309). All of these instances were covered by my
> general
> >>
> >> >>warning in msg 79329.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Sulla's concern about a pornographic image was sincere (#79357); I
> >> don't
> >> >>agree with the photo being pornographic, but everyone is free to voice
> a
> >> >>concern about Yahoo TOS issues.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > I asked everyone to remain civil in msg #79329, but who violated
> it,
> >> >>ignoring my general warning? Maior did in msg #79356 by claiming "this
> >> list
> >> >>consists of : dumb and dumber", which is what prompted the final
> warning.
> >>
> >> >>Part of what influenced the earnestness of the warning is that she has
> >> twice
> >> >>been moderated for uncivil behavior since the end of her magistracy,
> >> while at
> >> >>the same time being so vocal (in my view insincerely) about the
> >> importance of
> >> >>strict moderation on the ML.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > The situation is clear. Maior has in recent months been the most
> >> egregious
> >> >>violator of order on the ML. She should be relieved that the Praetura
> has
> >>
> >> >>been so tolerant and measured in its reactions.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Valete,
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Gualterus Graecus
> >> >> > Praetorian Quaestor
> >> >> >
> >> >> > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com <Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com><Nova-Roma%
> 40yahoogroups.com>,
>
> >> "rory12001" <rory12001@> wrote:
> >> >> > >
> >> >> > > Salvete;
> >> >> > > I received this final warning today below. Wow, my words,after
> being
> >>
> >> >>abused so nastily on this list were quite mild.
> >> >> > >
> >> >> > > Talk about double standards. Gualterus did tell everyone, after
> the
> >> >>vituperative was over "we must remain civil"
> >> >> > > Right.
> >> >> > > valete
> >> >> > > M. Hortensia Maior
> >> >> > >
> >> >> > > "Go back to the Bitch Alley, Maior, and rot there with the rest
> of
> >> your
> >> >>garbage." Enodia
> >> >> > > "when has Maior ever let the truth interfere with what she
> >> believed?"
> >> >> > > " [conventus matronarum' You advertised your list, containing a
> >> >>potentially pornographic picture on
> >> >> > > your page" Sulla
> >> >> > > ", but it is divorced from a
> >> >> > > brain" Gn. Iulius Caesar
> >> >> > >
> >> >> > >
> >> >> > > Salve Maior,
> >> >> > >
> >> >> > > This is an official warning about your recent lack of control on
> the
> >> ML.
> >> >>I specifically refer to msg #79356 where you comment: "Rofl; just
> shows
> >> you
> >> >>what this list consists of : dumb and dumber." You know well your
> point
> >> could
> >> >>have been made in a non-inflammatory manner. You have been placed on
> >> >>moderation already twice before and this is a warning that if you do
> not
> >> get
> >> >>yourself under control then a third moderation will be forthcoming.
> >> >> > >
> >> >> > > I find your offences especially egregious since you have been so
> >> vocal
> >> >>about strict moderation on the ML, yet you are the main offender in
> >> violating
> >> >>the moderation edict. Tread carefully since the next moderation may
> not
> >> be
> >> >>limited to 72 hours.
> >> >> > >
> >> >> > > Vale,
> >> >> > >
> >> >> > > Gualterus
> >> >> > >
> >> >> >
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------------
> >
> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79447 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2010-08-18
Subject: Re: a Praetorial Warning & unfairness
Maior,

How is this statement:

" [conventus matronarum' You advertised your list, containing a potentially
pornographic picture on
your page" Sulla

____

A double standard that you are trying to get across?

Vale,

Sulla

On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 11:28 PM, rory12001 <rory12001@...> wrote:

>
>
> Salvete;
> I received this final warning today below. Wow, my words,after being abused
> so nastily on this list were quite mild.
>
> Talk about double standards. Gualterus did tell everyone, after the
> vituperative was over "we must remain civil"
> Right.
> valete
> M. Hortensia Maior
>
> "Go back to the Bitch Alley, Maior, and rot there with the rest of your
> garbage." Enodia
> "when has Maior ever let the truth interfere with what she believed?"
> " [conventus matronarum' You advertised your list, containing a potentially
> pornographic picture on
> your page" Sulla
> ", but it is divorced from a
> brain" Gn. Iulius Caesar
>
>
> Salve Maior,
>
> This is an official warning about your recent lack of control on the ML. I
> specifically refer to msg #79356 where you comment: "Rofl; just shows you
> what this list consists of : dumb and dumber." You know well your point
> could have been made in a non-inflammatory manner. You have been placed on
> moderation already twice before and this is a warning that if you do not get
> yourself under control then a third moderation will be forthcoming.
>
> I find your offences especially egregious since you have been so vocal
> about strict moderation on the ML, yet you are the main offender in
> violating the moderation edict. Tread carefully since the next moderation
> may not be limited to 72 hours.
>
> Vale,
>
> Gualterus
>
>
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79448 From: Christer Edling Date: 2010-08-18
Subject: Edictum Consulare CFBQ XXIII on veto of the Edict on Appointment of
Ex Officio Consulis Caesonis Fabii Buteonis Quintiliani

Edictum Consulare CFBQ XXIII on veto of the Edict on Appointment of
two praetors by Consul PMA on the 18th of August

I expect Publius Memmius Albucius to stop acting as if he is the Rex
of Rome. He behavior has in effect given us a fantasy dictator in all
but name and those who support him have accepted a fantasy dictator of
their own, which of course is illegal.

I. I hereby veto the "Edict on Appointment of two praetors" published
by Consul Publius Memmius Albucius on the 18th of August. In my
capacity as Consul of Nova Roma I use my power to interpret the law to
declare that the edict by PMA mentioned above has broken the
Constitution and some of our laws. The two citizens named in that
edict are without any fault and innocent by themselves and I regret
being forced to take this action in that respect.

I1. For these following reasons I issue my veto over the edict by PMA
mentioned above:

First, The SCU didn't get the needed support as to few Senators voted.

Secondly, A quorum call had been requested, and was never made

Thirdly, The auspicia have been found to be in error by the Augurs

Fourthly, The appointments are being made based on preliminary vote
counting from an election that also had incorrect Auspicia.

Fifthly, A SCU will according to the Constitution "allow the Senate to
invest the consuls (pluralis and not singularis) with absolute powers
to deal with a specific situation, subject only to their collegial
veto and review by the Senate". A SCU is obviously supposed to be
possible to veto by a Colleague which I am doing right now. The SCU is
not only breaking a few laws and an Augurial decree, but also the
Constitution.

III. This Edictum becomes effective immediately.


Given this 18th of August, in the year of the Consulship of P. Memmius
Albucius and the Second Consulship of K.Fabius Buteo Quintilianus,
2763 AUC.


*****************
Vale

Caeso Fabius Buteo Quintilianus

Consul Iterum
Princeps Senatus et Flamen Palatualis
Civis Romanus sum
http://www.novaroma.org/nr/Main_Page
************************************************
Aut inveniam viam aut faciam
"I'll either find a way or make one"
************************************************
Dignitas, Iustitia, Fidelitas et Pietas
Dignity, Justice, Loyalty and Dutifulness
************************************************
Mons Palatinus, Clivus Victoriae
Palatine Hill, Incline of Victoriae
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79449 From: M. Octavius Gracchus Date: 2010-08-18
Subject: Re: Edictum Consulare CFBQ XXIII on veto of the Edict on Appointment
On 08/18/2010 04:58 PM, Christer Edling wrote:
> Ex Officio Consulis Caesonis Fabii Buteonis Quintiliani

Would it kill you to actually *talk* to your colleague?

Honestly, the two of you are acting like children.

I fought with my colleague too - but never to the extent that you are now doing. We were both just 30 years old, with hot tempers and no leadership experience. You're almost twice that age - what's *your* excuse?

Albucius, at least, is having a difficult time because he's being blocked by so-called Augurs who refuse to perform auguries for people they don't like; traitors who should be cast out, their citizenships shredded, their names erased from memory.

Why aren't *you* standing by your colleague, Caeso Fabius?

Why do you condone the actions of the false priests who have brought Nova Roma to a completely unnecessary crisis by refusing to perform auguries?

Why don't you demonstrate some actual *leadership*, rather than emerging from your hidden bunker only to fling vetoes and then scurry back under cover?

Vale,
M. Octavius Gracchus.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79450 From: Publius Memmius Albucius Date: 2010-08-18
Subject: Record and respect of the cos minor's veto of my appointment of two
Omnibus s.d.



I am taking good knowledge and record of the consul minor's decision to veto my edict appointing, in application of the senatus consultum ultimum of last Kal. Aug., Ullerius and Tullia as praetors suffecti and will respect it.



I however want to underline the fact that this respect is not based on the arguments developed by Fabius Buteo consul, which are irrelevant, but first on the fact that any veto has not to back itself on a rigourous legal argumentation, but just to mention its legal source, and second that the referred SCU has provided the consul minor such a possibility.



Quintilianus has taken, in knowledge, what he considers to be his responsibilities and showed that, after the failed coup for a dictatorship, he was back in office.

Even if I am rejoicing of this come back, which is the sign of a normal working of our institutions, that I have constantly called for, I must express my sincere regrets to Honorable Ullerius and Tullia, who would have probably served the Republic with integrity, honor and efficiency, and confirm the Senate that I will report to It on this situation.



I will abstain commenting here on the first paragraph of Quintilianus' edict which, coming from a recent apprentice-dictator, shows that, among his various skills, the consul minor owns no doubt true joking ones.



Valete omnes,





P. Memmius Albucius

consul







To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
CC: SenatusRomanus@yahoogroups.com; novaroma-announce@yahoogroups.com; Cohors_CFBQ@yahoogroups.com
From: christer.edling@...
Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2010 23:58:06 +0200
Subject: [NovaRoma-Announce] Edictum Consulare CFBQ XXIII on veto of the Edict on Appointment of two praetors by Consul PMA on the 18th of August






Ex Officio Consulis Caesonis Fabii Buteonis Quintiliani

Edictum Consulare CFBQ XXIII on veto of the Edict on Appointment of
two praetors by Consul PMA on the 18th of August

I expect Publius Memmius Albucius to stop acting as if he is the Rex
of Rome. He behavior has in effect given us a fantasy dictator in all
but name and those who support him have accepted a fantasy dictator of
their own, which of course is illegal.

I. I hereby veto the "Edict on Appointment of two praetors" published
by Consul Publius Memmius Albucius on the 18th of August. In my
capacity as Consul of Nova Roma I use my power to interpret the law to
declare that the edict by PMA mentioned above has broken the
Constitution and some of our laws. The two citizens named in that
edict are without any fault and innocent by themselves and I regret
being forced to take this action in that respect.

I1. For these following reasons I issue my veto over the edict by PMA
mentioned above:

First, The SCU didn't get the needed support as to few Senators voted.

Secondly, A quorum call had been requested, and was never made

Thirdly, The auspicia have been found to be in error by the Augurs

Fourthly, The appointments are being made based on preliminary vote
counting from an election that also had incorrect Auspicia.

Fifthly, A SCU will according to the Constitution "allow the Senate to
invest the consuls (pluralis and not singularis) with absolute powers
to deal with a specific situation, subject only to their collegial
veto and review by the Senate". A SCU is obviously supposed to be
possible to veto by a Colleague which I am doing right now. The SCU is
not only breaking a few laws and an Augurial decree, but also the
Constitution.

III. This Edictum becomes effective immediately.

Given this 18th of August, in the year of the Consulship of P. Memmius
Albucius and the Second Consulship of K.Fabius Buteo Quintilianus,
2763 AUC.

*****************
Vale

Caeso Fabius Buteo Quintilianus

Consul Iterum
Princeps Senatus et Flamen Palatualis
Civis Romanus sum
http://www.novaroma.org/nr/Main_Page
************************************************
Aut inveniam viam aut faciam
"I'll either find a way or make one"
************************************************
Dignitas, Iustitia, Fidelitas et Pietas
Dignity, Justice, Loyalty and Dutifulness
************************************************
Mons Palatinus, Clivus Victoriae
Palatine Hill, Incline of Victoriae






[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79451 From: rory12001 Date: 2010-08-18
Subject: Re: Edictum Consulare CFBQ XXIII on veto of the Edict on Appointment
Salve Gracche;
I've never had any words but praise for you and all the work you did for Nova Roma as our webmaster.

No augur ever refused to take auspices for Albucius. I dont know who is telling you this but Piscinus, Modianus, Agricola were all ready and have always taken auspices when asked.
vale
M. Hortensia Maior

>
> Albucius, at least, is having a difficult time because he's being blocked by so-called Augurs who refuse to perform auguries for people they don't like; traitors who should be cast out, their citizenships shredded, their names erased from memory.
>
> Why aren't *you* standing by your colleague, Caeso Fabius?
>
> Why do you condone the actions of the false priests who have brought Nova Roma to a completely unnecessary crisis by refusing to perform auguries?
>
> Why don't you demonstrate some actual *leadership*, rather than emerging from your hidden bunker only to fling vetoes and then scurry back under cover?
>
> Vale,
> M. Octavius Gracchus.
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79452 From: Publius Memmius Albucius Date: 2010-08-18
Subject: Request for auspices (next Senate session)
Salvete Augures,



As usual since last January, I am coming to you, so that the auspices be taken by one of you, according your choice, for the next Senate session that I intend calling for next a.d. IX Kal. Sept., with a vote beginning on pridie Kal. Sept..



I hope that, after four missed opportunities, nothing will prevent you, this time, to place your science at the service of my modest convening.



Thanks for informing me who will take the auspices, and to inform me of their result no later than next 23rd.



If ever the auspices were not favorable, I hereby inform you that I would convene the Senate for the soonest available day, this is to say for a vote on Sept. 3, or Sept. 4, or on 5 or on 7, etc.. Please therefore, in case of defavorable auspices, taking them for each of these dates until the Gods accept a favorable day.



Vobis gratias et valete tres,





P. Memmius Albucius cos.






[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79453 From: Kirsteen Wright Date: 2010-08-18
Subject: Re: Edictum Consulare CFBQ XXIII on veto of the Edict on Appointment
On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 12:00 AM, rory12001 <rory12001@...> wrote:

>
> No augur ever refused to take auspices for Albucius. I dont know who is
> telling you this but Piscinus, Modianus, Agricola were all ready and have
> always taken auspices when asked.


Well on July 27th it was Piscinus who stated that Consul Albucius had
requested the auspices be taken but they hadn't been.

Flavia Lucilla Merula

>
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79454 From: rory12001 Date: 2010-08-18
Subject: Re: Edictum Consulare CFBQ XXIII on veto of the Edict on Appointment
Salve;
let the augurs reply for themselves; I think we were in a senate session, but as I said; let the augurs speak!
vale
Maior

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Kirsteen Wright <kirsteen.falconsfan@...> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 12:00 AM, rory12001 <rory12001@...> wrote:
>
> >
> > No augur ever refused to take auspices for Albucius. I dont know who is
> > telling you this but Piscinus, Modianus, Agricola were all ready and have
> > always taken auspices when asked.
>
>
> Well on July 27th it was Piscinus who stated that Consul Albucius had
> requested the auspices be taken but they hadn't been.
>
> Flavia Lucilla Merula
>
> >
> >
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79455 From: James Hooper Date: 2010-08-18
Subject: Re: a Praetorial Warning & unfairness
Salve Sulla,
Well said.
Vale,
Marcellus


On Wed, 18 Aug 2010 08:22:29 -0700
Robert Woolwine <robert.woolwine@...> wrote:
> Ave,
>
> No offense at all. :) Just making a point.
>
> I just am trying to stay away from those strawman arguments of Romans vs
> Barbarians. It is in similar in vein as those that act like McCarthy and
> others in the House UnAmerican Activities Committee when they ask just what
> have you done for NR? It is a strawman and we should strive to be better
> than to rely on strawman arguments.
>
> Vale,
>
> Sulla
>
> On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 8:15 AM, James Hooper
><warrior44_us@...>wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> Salve,
>> Barbarians do much the same I'm afraid. As much as I've read about the so
>> called "savages." The point I wa trying to make was to hace civility on the
>> ML
>> not the name calling. I know that Romans were very passionate about their
>> politics especially in the republican era. Forgive me if I offended.
>> Vale,
>> C. Pomeius Marcellus
>>
>>
>> On Wed, 18 Aug 2010 07:50:41 -0700
>> Robert Woolwine <robert.woolwine@... <robert.woolwine%40gmail.com>>
>> wrote:
>> > We are acting like Romans! Romans argued, disagreed and had strong
>> > political feelings. We are acting like REPUBLICAN ROMANS.
>> >
>> > Since you brought it up, how do Barbarians act?
>> >
>> > Vale,
>> >
>> > Sulla
>> >
>> > On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 7:39 AM, James Hooper
>> ><warrior44_us@... <warrior44_us%40bresnan.net>>wrote:
>> >
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Salve Citizens,
>> >> Having read enough of this. Please I beg you to let Blessed
>> >> Concordia rule in this matter. If a member has performed badly and draws
>> >> controversy to him/her self, let the matter be solved without the gutter
>> >> langauge I have read in this matter. Dominus et Domina, let us act like
>> >> Romans
>> >> and not like barbarians.
>> >> C. Pompeius Marcellus
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> On Wed, 18 Aug 2010 12:32:43 -0000
>> >> "Cato" <catoinnyc@... <catoinnyc%40gmail.com> <catoinnyc%
>> 40gmail.com>> wrote:
>> >> > Cato Piscino sal.
>> >> >
>> >> > You're trying to turn this into a "boy-vs.-girl" thing - again.
>> Perhaps
>> >> >you're trying to salvage some scrap of dignity, after having your
>> attempt
>> >> at
>> >> >destroying the civil authority of the Respublica squashed, by playing
>> this
>> >>
>> >> >red herring. It won't work.
>> >> >
>> >> > The "women of NR" have repeatedly voiced their clear and unadulterated
>> >> >disgust at Maior and her tactics. You are not a woman so perhaps you
>> >> should
>> >> >let them speak for themselves.
>> >> >
>> >> > Maior resigned because she cannot control herself - and was found
>> guilty
>> >> of
>> >> >abusing her power by a Nova Roman court.
>> >> >
>> >> > You don't know - nor should you know - if anyone of those whom you
>> >> mentioned
>> >> >(and by the way, Enodia is a woman, so you calling her a "Back Alley
>> Boy"
>> >> is
>> >> >somewhat ludicrous) have been warned as well.
>> >> >
>> >> > It was Maior who brought her private warning into the public eye.
>> >> >
>> >> > Vale,
>> >> >
>> >> > Cato
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
>><Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com><Nova-Roma%
>> 40yahoogroups.com>,
>>
>> >> "marcushoratius" <MHoratius@...> wrote:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> M. Moravius Gualtero dicit
>> >> >>
>> >> >> You demonstrate precisely the prejudices of a minority group that has
>> >> been
>> >> >>harassing female sacerdotes and magistrates, which led to the loss of
>> our
>> >>
>> >> >>Virgo Maxima, our CFO, and our Praetrices this year.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> How does saying "ROFL . . . dumb and dumber" compare to Enodia
>> calling
>> >> Maior
>> >> >>"bitch"?
>> >> >>
>> >> >> How does a non-pornographic photo on another site compare to the one
>> >> Sulla
>> >> >>had on his list depicting Complutensis and Cordus double-banging
>> Maior?
>> >> And
>> >> >>what of the electronic harassment conducted by Sulla against Maior,
>> >> against
>> >> >>Equestria, against the Virgo Maxima? Two of those women resigned
>> because
>> >> of
>> >> >>the harassment they have received from this group in the Back Alley.
>> >> Thanks
>> >> >>to Sulla and his friends Nova Roma lost its CFO and its Virgo Maxima,
>> and
>> >>
>> >> >>both of our Praetrices.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> What of Maior? She is made of stronger stuff, standing up to the
>> >> >>harassment. And that is why she has become such a target for Sulla,
>> his
>> >> >>house-guest Metellus and the rest of the Back Alley Boys. So what do
>> you
>> >> do?
>> >> >>Moderate her for defending herself even as you allow others to throw
>> >> worse
>> >> >>insults at her. Are you part of the moderation team that was set up to
>> >> >>prevent this sort of conduct on our lists? Or are you part of those
>> >> BABies
>> >> >>who are attempting to drive more women away from Nova Roma?
>> >> >>
>> >> >> And since when is the term "idiot" so more offensive than Caesar
>> saying
>> >> >>Maior was detached from her brain? Is he alluding to beheading Maior
>> for
>> >> >>standing up to the abuse she and other women have received from his
>> BAB
>> >> >>friends? Did you warn him or any of these others for their persistent
>> >> >>insults to our magistrates and sacerdotes?
>> >> >>
>> >> >> And why shouldn't Maior be upset when people are continually and
>> >> unjustly
>> >> >>insulting her even after the Censors issued a nota against Metellus
>> for
>> >> his
>> >> >>gross insults against her? This has been a campaign of insults
>> directed
>> >> >>against the women of Nova Roma, and in my opinion it is a matter of
>> >> idiocy on
>> >> >>the part of the Senate, certain magistrates and their appointees like
>> you
>> >> who
>> >> >>have condoned, permitted, and even joined in with these foul-mouthed,
>> >> >>ill-mannered, disrepectful individuals who do nothing but spread their
>> >> filth
>> >> >>and encourage others to sexually harass women who actually work for
>> Nova
>> >> >>Roma. It is idiotic of the Albucius faction to allow this sort of
>> >> behavior to
>> >> >>continue when it has for so long been detrimintal to Nova Roma.
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
>><Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com><Nova-Roma%
>> 40yahoogroups.com>,
>>
>> >> "gualterus_graecus" <waltms1@> wrote:
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > Salvete,
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > Maior is obfuscating the facts.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > Firstly, Enodia's, Caesar's and Sulla's (79320) comments were part
>> of
>> >> the
>> >> >>sensitive thread "Farewell, Nova Roma" for which a general warning was
>> >> given.
>> >> >>This thread included two posts where Maior insulted people by using
>> the
>> >> word
>> >> >>"idiot" (79295, 79309). All of these instances were covered by my
>> general
>> >>
>> >> >>warning in msg 79329.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > Sulla's concern about a pornographic image was sincere (#79357); I
>> >> don't
>> >> >>agree with the photo being pornographic, but everyone is free to voice
>> a
>> >> >>concern about Yahoo TOS issues.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > I asked everyone to remain civil in msg #79329, but who violated
>> it,
>> >> >>ignoring my general warning? Maior did in msg #79356 by claiming "this
>> >> list
>> >> >>consists of : dumb and dumber", which is what prompted the final
>> warning.
>> >>
>> >> >>Part of what influenced the earnestness of the warning is that she has
>> >> twice
>> >> >>been moderated for uncivil behavior since the end of her magistracy,
>> >> while at
>> >> >>the same time being so vocal (in my view insincerely) about the
>> >> importance of
>> >> >>strict moderation on the ML.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > The situation is clear. Maior has in recent months been the most
>> >> egregious
>> >> >>violator of order on the ML. She should be relieved that the Praetura
>> has
>> >>
>> >> >>been so tolerant and measured in its reactions.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > Valete,
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > Gualterus Graecus
>> >> >> > Praetorian Quaestor
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
>><Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com><Nova-Roma%
>> 40yahoogroups.com>,
>>
>> >> "rory12001" <rory12001@> wrote:
>> >> >> > >
>> >> >> > > Salvete;
>> >> >> > > I received this final warning today below. Wow, my words,after
>> being
>> >>
>> >> >>abused so nastily on this list were quite mild.
>> >> >> > >
>> >> >> > > Talk about double standards. Gualterus did tell everyone, after
>> the
>> >> >>vituperative was over "we must remain civil"
>> >> >> > > Right.
>> >> >> > > valete
>> >> >> > > M. Hortensia Maior
>> >> >> > >
>> >> >> > > "Go back to the Bitch Alley, Maior, and rot there with the rest
>> of
>> >> your
>> >> >>garbage." Enodia
>> >> >> > > "when has Maior ever let the truth interfere with what she
>> >> believed?"
>> >> >> > > " [conventus matronarum' You advertised your list, containing a
>> >> >>potentially pornographic picture on
>> >> >> > > your page" Sulla
>> >> >> > > ", but it is divorced from a
>> >> >> > > brain" Gn. Iulius Caesar
>> >> >> > >
>> >> >> > >
>> >> >> > > Salve Maior,
>> >> >> > >
>> >> >> > > This is an official warning about your recent lack of control on
>> the
>> >> ML.
>> >> >>I specifically refer to msg #79356 where you comment: "Rofl; just
>> shows
>> >> you
>> >> >>what this list consists of : dumb and dumber." You know well your
>> point
>> >> could
>> >> >>have been made in a non-inflammatory manner. You have been placed on
>> >> >>moderation already twice before and this is a warning that if you do
>> not
>> >> get
>> >> >>yourself under control then a third moderation will be forthcoming.
>> >> >> > >
>> >> >> > > I find your offences especially egregious since you have been so
>> >> vocal
>> >> >>about strict moderation on the ML, yet you are the main offender in
>> >> violating
>> >> >>the moderation edict. Tread carefully since the next moderation may
>> not
>> >> be
>> >> >>limited to 72 hours.
>> >> >> > >
>> >> >> > > Vale,
>> >> >> > >
>> >> >> > > Gualterus
>> >> >> > >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >>
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > ------------------------------------
>> >
>> > Yahoo! Groups Links
>> >
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79456 From: M. Octavius Gracchus Date: 2010-08-18
Subject: Re: Edictum Consulare CFBQ XXIII on veto of the Edict on Appointment
Salve Maior,

> Salve Gracche;
> I've never had any words but praise for you and all the work you did for Nova Roma as our webmaster.

Thank you, but I cannot reciprocate.

At one time, I certainly thought you were a productive member of society, able
to work for the benefit of Nova Roma - I was one of the two censores who named
you Senator. But then you began regularly forwarding BackAlley messages to the
main list, in open defiance of the rules of the list where they were written, in
an attempt to discredit their authors. After being ejected from that list, you
repeatedly resubscribed, doing it again and again, *gloating* in your
deviousness. You have harassed them to such an extent that they've had to close
the list archives, solely to thwart your repeated infiltration attempts. You
are a vandal.

Therefore, I reject your praise, for words from your lips can bring me no glory.

Vale,
M. Octavius Gracchus,
free man.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79457 From: rory12001 Date: 2010-08-18
Subject: Re: Edictum Consulare CFBQ XXIII on veto of the Edict on Appointment
Salve Gracche;
if the BA hadn't cross-posted material from the Senate list, the CP and the College of Augurs, maybe you'd have a point.

If the BA didn't call themselves a 'forum' and invite all NR citizens, maybe you could call me out.

If the BA didn't formulate political plots, use all our Roman names and post private photos of Modianus, my personal macro info, obscene drawings, etc

But they do. So I refuse to accept their double standards like the smart woman I am. Poor Laeca and Messallina couldn't take the harassment and left!

Sulla here is posting nice scholarly extracts on the ML; but here is the unvarnished Sulla from the BA:
============================================================================================================================================
Re: [BackAlley] My ML post's


She is full of sh*t.

I joked about the hot lesbo action HERE on the BA.

Maior forwarded it on the ML. She should be pissed off at Maior for forwarding it.

I was the only one of us who would not stoop to apologizing to the bit*h. She [Virgo Maxima] has no qualms calling me a cancer in NR. She deserves the mud that gets thrown back at her. If she can't hang....I think will shed a tear for her...NOT.

Her religious title does not make her immune from mudslinging when she chooses to get into the political arena.


On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 12:34 PM, Charlie Collins <oldroman@...> wrote:


She like Maior continually talks about the accusations that you and Cato are insulting them with sexual and foul language and that proof exists on the ML. They will not provide the proof of such and want us to go look for it. To me they have to provide the actual e-mails in their entirety (not just a quote here and there) to me and others to look at for proof. She said I suffered from "Selective Amnesia" that pissed me off. I'm thin skinned I guess.





You have harassed them to such an extent that they've had to close
> the list archives, solely to thwart your repeated infiltration attempts. You
> are a vandal.
>
> Therefore, I reject your praise, for words from your lips can bring me no glory.
>
> Vale,
> M. Octavius Gracchus,
> free man.
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79458 From: Cato Date: 2010-08-19
Subject: Forwarding Irrelevent Postings from Unofficial Lists
Cato omnibus in foro SPD

Is this a dream or is she doing it yet *again*?

Is it *possible* for a human being to be this ... stupid?

I'm sorry, Pompeius Marcellus, but here simply is no other word that applies here.

Although ... one of the definitions of insanity is the repetition of a specific act with the expectation of a different outcome.

Vale,

Cato



--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "rory12001" <rory12001@...> wrote:
>
> Salve Gracche;
> if the BA hadn't cross-posted material from the Senate list, the CP and the College of Augurs, maybe you'd have a point.
>
> If the BA didn't call themselves a 'forum' and invite all NR citizens, maybe you could call me out.
>
> If the BA didn't formulate political plots, use all our Roman names and post private photos of Modianus, my personal macro info, obscene drawings, etc
>
> But they do. So I refuse to accept their double standards like the smart woman I am. Poor Laeca and Messallina couldn't take the harassment and left!
>
> Sulla here is posting nice scholarly extracts on the ML; but here is the unvarnished Sulla from the BA:
> ============================================================================================================================================
> Re: [BackAlley] My ML post's
>
>
> She is full of sh*t.
>
> I joked about the hot lesbo action HERE on the BA.
>
> Maior forwarded it on the ML. She should be pissed off at Maior for forwarding it.
>
> I was the only one of us who would not stoop to apologizing to the bit*h. She [Virgo Maxima] has no qualms calling me a cancer in NR. She deserves the mud that gets thrown back at her. If she can't hang....I think will shed a tear for her...NOT.
>
> Her religious title does not make her immune from mudslinging when she chooses to get into the political arena.
>
>
> On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 12:34 PM, Charlie Collins <oldroman@> wrote:
>
>
> She like Maior continually talks about the accusations that you and Cato are insulting them with sexual and foul language and that proof exists on the ML. They will not provide the proof of such and want us to go look for it. To me they have to provide the actual e-mails in their entirety (not just a quote here and there) to me and others to look at for proof. She said I suffered from "Selective Amnesia" that pissed me off. I'm thin skinned I guess.
>
>
>
>
>
> You have harassed them to such an extent that they've had to close
> > the list archives, solely to thwart your repeated infiltration attempts. You
> > are a vandal.
> >
> > Therefore, I reject your praise, for words from your lips can bring me no glory.
> >
> > Vale,
> > M. Octavius Gracchus,
> > free man.
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79459 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2010-08-19
Subject: Re: Forwarding Irrelevent Postings from Unofficial Lists
Oh Cato, she is just proving beyond a doubt that Metellus's statement about
her is ABSOLUTELY, 100% accurate statement. With no doubt.

Vale,

Sulla

On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 9:09 PM, Cato <catoinnyc@...> wrote:

>
>
> Cato omnibus in foro SPD
>
> Is this a dream or is she doing it yet *again*?
>
> Is it *possible* for a human being to be this ... stupid?
>
> I'm sorry, Pompeius Marcellus, but here simply is no other word that
> applies here.
>
> Although ... one of the definitions of insanity is the repetition of a
> specific act with the expectation of a different outcome.
>
> Vale,
>
> Cato
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com <Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com>,
> "rory12001" <rory12001@...> wrote:
> >
> > Salve Gracche;
> > if the BA hadn't cross-posted material from the Senate list, the CP and
> the College of Augurs, maybe you'd have a point.
> >
> > If the BA didn't call themselves a 'forum' and invite all NR citizens,
> maybe you could call me out.
> >
> > If the BA didn't formulate political plots, use all our Roman names and
> post private photos of Modianus, my personal macro info, obscene drawings,
> etc
> >
> > But they do. So I refuse to accept their double standards like the smart
> woman I am. Poor Laeca and Messallina couldn't take the harassment and left!
> >
> > Sulla here is posting nice scholarly extracts on the ML; but here is the
> unvarnished Sulla from the BA:
> >
> ============================================================================================================================================
> > Re: [BackAlley] My ML post's
> >
> >
> > She is full of sh*t.
> >
> > I joked about the hot lesbo action HERE on the BA.
> >
> > Maior forwarded it on the ML. She should be pissed off at Maior for
> forwarding it.
> >
> > I was the only one of us who would not stoop to apologizing to the bit*h.
> She [Virgo Maxima] has no qualms calling me a cancer in NR. She deserves the
> mud that gets thrown back at her. If she can't hang....I think will shed a
> tear for her...NOT.
> >
> > Her religious title does not make her immune from mudslinging when she
> chooses to get into the political arena.
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 12:34 PM, Charlie Collins <oldroman@> wrote:
> >
> >
> > She like Maior continually talks about the accusations that you and Cato
> are insulting them with sexual and foul language and that proof exists on
> the ML. They will not provide the proof of such and want us to go look for
> it. To me they have to provide the actual e-mails in their entirety (not
> just a quote here and there) to me and others to look at for proof. She said
> I suffered from "Selective Amnesia" that pissed me off. I'm thin skinned I
> guess.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > You have harassed them to such an extent that they've had to close
> > > the list archives, solely to thwart your repeated infiltration
> attempts. You
> > > are a vandal.
> > >
> > > Therefore, I reject your praise, for words from your lips can bring me
> no glory.
> > >
> > > Vale,
> > > M. Octavius Gracchus,
> > > free man.
> > >
> >
>
>
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79460 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2010-08-19
Subject: Women in Nova Roma
This is a post that I asked the Back alley and it started a really
interesting discussion, especially in regards to the service of women in
Nova Roma in the past. I have since been asked to cross over this
discussion to the ML. Here is my initial post:

Avete Everyone,

I have a question for ya'll and yes it is a serious question. And, since
many of the active women in Nova Roma are on this list - I think this is the
best way to address this issue.

You'll have heard before, primarily from Maior, that women are disrespected
in Nova Roma and that Nova Roma is not a friendly environment to women. Do
you believe this is true? Why?

In an organization of roughly 100+ people what is the actual ratio of men to
women in NR? I personally am thinking its about 60/40 men. (but I have not
had the time or ability to check)

Do you think that the organization should do something to rectify this or
given its small and declining state that there are more pressing issues that
must be addressed (like the bylaws or IT issue, the failed coup attempt -
etc etc).

Do you think the resignation of Messalina factors your rationale if you feel
that Nova Roma disrespects women or is not a friendly environment to women?
Why?

Thank you for your input - I appreciate it.

Vale,

Sulla


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79461 From: petronius_dexter Date: 2010-08-19
Subject: Re: Request for auspices (next Senate session)
Ave consul,

This time, you are absolutely right to publicly demand auspicia to the augurs.

Now people will see and judge.

Optime vale.

C. Petronius Dexter
Tribunus Plebis Arcoiali scribebat
a. d. XIV Kalendas Septembres P. Memmio K. Fabio II coss.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79462 From: rory12001 Date: 2010-08-19
Subject: Re: Request for auspices (next Senate session)
Salvete;
he'd better write to them privately, Modianus is unsubscribed from the ML he's so disgusted. wise.
vale
Maior

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "petronius_dexter" <jfarnoud94@...> wrote:
>
> Ave consul,
>
> This time, you are absolutely right to publicly demand auspicia to the augurs.
>
> Now people will see and judge.
>
> Optime vale.
>
> C. Petronius Dexter
> Tribunus Plebis Arcoiali scribebat
> a. d. XIV Kalendas Septembres P. Memmio K. Fabio II coss.
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79463 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2010-08-19
Subject: Re: Request for auspices (next Senate session)
So much for a magistrate doing his job!

Vale,

Sulla

On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 9:28 PM, rory12001 <rory12001@...> wrote:

>
>
> Salvete;
> he'd better write to them privately, Modianus is unsubscribed from the ML
> he's so disgusted. wise.
> vale
> Maior
>
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com <Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com>,
> "petronius_dexter" <jfarnoud94@...> wrote:
> >
> > Ave consul,
> >
> > This time, you are absolutely right to publicly demand auspicia to the
> augurs.
> >
> > Now people will see and judge.
> >
> > Optime vale.
> >
> > C. Petronius Dexter
> > Tribunus Plebis Arcoiali scribebat
> > a. d. XIV Kalendas Septembres P. Memmio K. Fabio II coss.
> >
>
>
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79464 From: petronius_dexter Date: 2010-08-19
Subject: Re: Request for auspices (next Senate session)
C. Petronius Maiori s.p.d.,

> he'd better write to them privately, Modianus is unsubscribed from the ML he's so disgusted. wise.

Unfortunately, since 1st january he did, but augurs did not take auspices for him...


Optime vale.

C. Petronius Dexter
Tribunus Plebis Arcoiali scribebat
a. d. XIV Kalendas Septembres P. Memmio K. Fabio II coss.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79465 From: Cato Date: 2010-08-19
Subject: Re: Request for auspices (next Senate session)
Cato Maiori omnibusque in foro SPD

Are you serious? A censor of the Respublica is "unsubscribed" from the main venue of communication within the organization?

I don't care if he despises every single citizen of ours in the world, he has a magistracy and has an obligation to be aware of what is happening. If he can't reign in his "disgust" perhaps he should resign.

Valete,

Cato



--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "rory12001" <rory12001@...> wrote:
>
> Salvete;
> he'd better write to them privately, Modianus is unsubscribed from the ML he's so disgusted. wise.
> vale
> Maior
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79466 From: enodia2002 Date: 2010-08-19
Subject: Re: a Praetorial Warning & unfairness
Piscinus,

You really must learn how to read. For the record, I did NOT call Maior a "bitch". I mentioned the new yahoogroup she had started by the name I was first made aware of it, the "Bitch Alley".

I have not, and have no intention of calling Maior a "bitch" on the Main List. If I have lacerated the delicate sensibilities of anyone on this list, I do apologize, however I am not responsible for what Maior chooses to do or say.

Vale,
Enodia

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "marcushoratius" <MHoratius@...> wrote:
>
> M. Moravius Gualtero dicit
>
> You demonstrate precisely the prejudices of a minority group that has been harassing female sacerdotes and magistrates, which led to the loss of our Virgo Maxima, our CFO, and our Praetrices this year.
>
> How does saying "ROFL . . . dumb and dumber" compare to Enodia calling Maior "bitch"?
>
> How does a non-pornographic photo on another site compare to the one Sulla had on his list depicting Complutensis and Cordus double-banging Maior? And what of the electronic harassment conducted by Sulla against Maior, against Equestria, against the Virgo Maxima? Two of those women resigned because of the harassment they have received from this group in the Back Alley. Thanks to Sulla and his friends Nova Roma lost its CFO and its Virgo Maxima, and both of our Praetrices.
>
> What of Maior? She is made of stronger stuff, standing up to the harassment. And that is why she has become such a target for Sulla, his house-guest Metellus and the rest of the Back Alley Boys. So what do you do? Moderate her for defending herself even as you allow others to throw worse insults at her. Are you part of the moderation team that was set up to prevent this sort of conduct on our lists? Or are you part of those BABies who are attempting to drive more women away from Nova Roma?
>
> And since when is the term "idiot" so more offensive than Caesar saying Maior was detached from her brain? Is he alluding to beheading Maior for standing up to the abuse she and other women have received from his BAB friends? Did you warn him or any of these others for their persistent insults to our magistrates and sacerdotes?
>
> And why shouldn't Maior be upset when people are continually and unjustly insulting her even after the Censors issued a nota against Metellus for his gross insults against her? This has been a campaign of insults directed against the women of Nova Roma, and in my opinion it is a matter of idiocy on the part of the Senate, certain magistrates and their appointees like you who have condoned, permitted, and even joined in with these foul-mouthed, ill-mannered, disrepectful individuals who do nothing but spread their filth and encourage others to sexually harass women who actually work for Nova Roma. It is idiotic of the Albucius faction to allow this sort of behavior to continue when it has for so long been detrimintal to Nova Roma.
>
>
>
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "gualterus_graecus" <waltms1@> wrote:
> >
> > Salvete,
> >
> > Maior is obfuscating the facts.
> >
> > Firstly, Enodia's, Caesar's and Sulla's (79320) comments were part of the sensitive thread "Farewell, Nova Roma" for which a general warning was given. This thread included two posts where Maior insulted people by using the word "idiot" (79295, 79309). All of these instances were covered by my general warning in msg 79329.
> >
> > Sulla's concern about a pornographic image was sincere (#79357); I don't agree with the photo being pornographic, but everyone is free to voice a concern about Yahoo TOS issues.
> >
> > I asked everyone to remain civil in msg #79329, but who violated it, ignoring my general warning? Maior did in msg #79356 by claiming "this list consists of : dumb and dumber", which is what prompted the final warning. Part of what influenced the earnestness of the warning is that she has twice been moderated for uncivil behavior since the end of her magistracy, while at the same time being so vocal (in my view insincerely) about the importance of strict moderation on the ML.
> >
> > The situation is clear. Maior has in recent months been the most egregious violator of order on the ML. She should be relieved that the Praetura has been so tolerant and measured in its reactions.
> >
> > Valete,
> >
> > Gualterus Graecus
> > Praetorian Quaestor
> >
> > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "rory12001" <rory12001@> wrote:
> > >
> > > Salvete;
> > > I received this final warning today below. Wow, my words,after being abused so nastily on this list were quite mild.
> > >
> > > Talk about double standards. Gualterus did tell everyone, after the vituperative was over "we must remain civil"
> > > Right.
> > > valete
> > > M. Hortensia Maior
> > >
> > > "Go back to the Bitch Alley, Maior, and rot there with the rest of your garbage." Enodia
> > > "when has Maior ever let the truth interfere with what she believed?"
> > > " [conventus matronarum' You advertised your list, containing a potentially pornographic picture on
> > > your page" Sulla
> > > ", but it is divorced from a
> > > brain" Gn. Iulius Caesar
> > >
> > >
> > > Salve Maior,
> > >
> > > This is an official warning about your recent lack of control on the ML. I specifically refer to msg #79356 where you comment: "Rofl; just shows you what this list consists of : dumb and dumber." You know well your point could have been made in a non-inflammatory manner. You have been placed on moderation already twice before and this is a warning that if you do not get yourself under control then a third moderation will be forthcoming.
> > >
> > > I find your offences especially egregious since you have been so vocal about strict moderation on the ML, yet you are the main offender in violating the moderation edict. Tread carefully since the next moderation may not be limited to 72 hours.
> > >
> > > Vale,
> > >
> > > Gualterus
> > >
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79467 From: rory12001 Date: 2010-08-19
Subject: Re: a Praetorial Warning & unfairness
"Go back to the Bitch Alley, Maior, and rot there with the rest of your garbage"

Is what you wrote & for the record you should be offering the apology to me.
vale
Maior



:
>
> Piscinus,
>
> You really must learn how to read. For the record, I did NOT call Maior a "bitch". I mentioned the new yahoogroup she had started by the name I was first made aware of it, the "Bitch Alley".
>
> I have not, and have no intention of calling Maior a "bitch" on the Main List. If I have lacerated the delicate sensibilities of anyone on this list, I do apologize, however I am not responsible for what Maior chooses to do or say.
>
> Vale,
> Enodia
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "marcushoratius" <MHoratius@> wrote:
> >
> > M. Moravius Gualtero dicit
> >
> > You demonstrate precisely the prejudices of a minority group that has been harassing female sacerdotes and magistrates, which led to the loss of our Virgo Maxima, our CFO, and our Praetrices this year.
> >
> > How does saying "ROFL . . . dumb and dumber" compare to Enodia calling Maior "bitch"?
> >
> > How does a non-pornographic photo on another site compare to the one Sulla had on his list depicting Complutensis and Cordus double-banging Maior? And what of the electronic harassment conducted by Sulla against Maior, against Equestria, against the Virgo Maxima? Two of those women resigned because of the harassment they have received from this group in the Back Alley. Thanks to Sulla and his friends Nova Roma lost its CFO and its Virgo Maxima, and both of our Praetrices.
> >
> > What of Maior? She is made of stronger stuff, standing up to the harassment. And that is why she has become such a target for Sulla, his house-guest Metellus and the rest of the Back Alley Boys. So what do you do? Moderate her for defending herself even as you allow others to throw worse insults at her. Are you part of the moderation team that was set up to prevent this sort of conduct on our lists? Or are you part of those BABies who are attempting to drive more women away from Nova Roma?
> >
> > And since when is the term "idiot" so more offensive than Caesar saying Maior was detached from her brain? Is he alluding to beheading Maior for standing up to the abuse she and other women have received from his BAB friends? Did you warn him or any of these others for their persistent insults to our magistrates and sacerdotes?
> >
> > And why shouldn't Maior be upset when people are continually and unjustly insulting her even after the Censors issued a nota against Metellus for his gross insults against her? This has been a campaign of insults directed against the women of Nova Roma, and in my opinion it is a matter of idiocy on the part of the Senate, certain magistrates and their appointees like you who have condoned, permitted, and even joined in with these foul-mouthed, ill-mannered, disrepectful individuals who do nothing but spread their filth and encourage others to sexually harass women who actually work for Nova Roma. It is idiotic of the Albucius faction to allow this sort of behavior to continue when it has for so long been detrimintal to Nova Roma.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "gualterus_graecus" <waltms1@> wrote:
> > >
> > > Salvete,
> > >
> > > Maior is obfuscating the facts.
> > >
> > > Firstly, Enodia's, Caesar's and Sulla's (79320) comments were part of the sensitive thread "Farewell, Nova Roma" for which a general warning was given. This thread included two posts where Maior insulted people by using the word "idiot" (79295, 79309). All of these instances were covered by my general warning in msg 79329.
> > >
> > > Sulla's concern about a pornographic image was sincere (#79357); I don't agree with the photo being pornographic, but everyone is free to voice a concern about Yahoo TOS issues.
> > >
> > > I asked everyone to remain civil in msg #79329, but who violated it, ignoring my general warning? Maior did in msg #79356 by claiming "this list consists of : dumb and dumber", which is what prompted the final warning. Part of what influenced the earnestness of the warning is that she has twice been moderated for uncivil behavior since the end of her magistracy, while at the same time being so vocal (in my view insincerely) about the importance of strict moderation on the ML.
> > >
> > > The situation is clear. Maior has in recent months been the most egregious violator of order on the ML. She should be relieved that the Praetura has been so tolerant and measured in its reactions.
> > >
> > > Valete,
> > >
> > > Gualterus Graecus
> > > Praetorian Quaestor
> > >
> > > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "rory12001" <rory12001@> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Salvete;
> > > > I received this final warning today below. Wow, my words,after being abused so nastily on this list were quite mild.
> > > >
> > > > Talk about double standards. Gualterus did tell everyone, after the vituperative was over "we must remain civil"
> > > > Right.
> > > > valete
> > > > M. Hortensia Maior
> > > >
> > > > "Go back to the Bitch Alley, Maior, and rot there with the rest of your garbage." Enodia
> > > > "when has Maior ever let the truth interfere with what she believed?"
> > > > " [conventus matronarum' You advertised your list, containing a potentially pornographic picture on
> > > > your page" Sulla
> > > > ", but it is divorced from a
> > > > brain" Gn. Iulius Caesar
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Salve Maior,
> > > >
> > > > This is an official warning about your recent lack of control on the ML. I specifically refer to msg #79356 where you comment: "Rofl; just shows you what this list consists of : dumb and dumber." You know well your point could have been made in a non-inflammatory manner. You have been placed on moderation already twice before and this is a warning that if you do not get yourself under control then a third moderation will be forthcoming.
> > > >
> > > > I find your offences especially egregious since you have been so vocal about strict moderation on the ML, yet you are the main offender in violating the moderation edict. Tread carefully since the next moderation may not be limited to 72 hours.
> > > >
> > > > Vale,
> > > >
> > > > Gualterus
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79468 From: Kirsteen Wright Date: 2010-08-19
Subject: Re: Edictum Consulare CFBQ XXIII on veto of the Edict on Appointment
On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 1:00 AM, rory12001 <rory12001@...> wrote:

> Salve;
> let the augurs reply for themselves;
>

He did. He posted it on the ML. How else can he reply to NR?

Merula


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79469 From: marcushoratius Date: 2010-08-19
Subject: a. d. XIV Kalendas Septembris: VINALIA RUSTICA
M. Moravius Piscinus Pontifex Maximus Quiritibus, cultoribus Deorum et omnibus salutem plurimam dicit: Venus nos complectatur dulce.

Hodie est ante diem XIV Kalendas Septembris; haec dies fastus est: Vinalia Rustica; feriae Iovi; Veneri ad Circum Maximum.

Vinalia Rustica

"The Vinalia, from vinum (wine); this day is sacred to Jupiter, not to Venus. This feast receives no slight attention in Latium: for in some places the vintages were started by priests, on behalf of the state, as at Rome they are even now: for the flamen Dialis makes an official commencement of the vintage, and when he has given orders to gather the grapes, he sacrifices a lamb to Jupiter, and between the cutting out of the victim's vitals and then offering them to the God he himself first plucks a bunch of grapes. On the gates of Tusculum there is the inscription: The new wine shall not be carried into the city until the Vinalia has been proclaimed." ~ M. Terrentius Varro, Lingua Latinae 6.16

At this time of year grapes would be fully formed on the vine, yet not ready for harvest until weeks later. It is not certain whether the Auspicatio Vindemiae to which Varro referred took place at this time or at the earlier Vinalia in April. It could easily apply to either or to both, as a ritual to ensure the continued health of the vines at this critical time. Another aspect of the festival, posed by Mommsen, would have the vintage produced in the previous year now aged and ready to be opened. It was thus the Vinalia Rustica because after this festival the vintage of the previous year could be brought into the cities for sale. Both festivals were dedicated to Jupiter, showing that He was originally the patron God of wine before Liber. From the imperial period there do appear inscriptions dedicated to a Jupiter Liber, but these refer to a North African Saturninus. On both festival days, too, there occurred festivals for Venus as well. Varro indicates that there was some confusion in the public view of the Vinalia being a festival of Venus. The Goddess was at times associated with the effects of wine and as a Goddess of flowers and of gardens She may have been associated with the vintages produced by individual households. However the Vinalia concerned the vintage of all producers and thus also concerned the welfare of the state since wine is a gift of the Gods to mortals and an essential offering sacrificed by mortals to the Gods. Wine is the seal that binds the Pax Deorum between mortals and immortals.

"The nineteenth of August was called the Vinalia Rustica because at that time a temple was dedicated to Venus and gardens were set apart for Her, and then the kitchen-gardeners went on holiday." ~ M. Terrentius Varro, Lingua Latinae 6.20


Feriae Holitorium

A festival of gardeners (holitores) held for Venus in the locus of Libitina. As a Goddess of flowers and gardens, Venus was earlier known as Murcia. Libitina was an Italic Goddess of flowers, similar to Flora, but also caring for the dead in the manner of Proserpina and Venus. In southern Italy funerary altars often depicted three Goddesses – Ceres and Venus with Proserpina, Hekate, Flora, or Libitina.


"Why do they sell articles for funerals in the precinct of Libitina, whom they identify with Venus? Is it also one of the philosophic devices of King Numa, that they should learn not to feel repugnance at such things nor shun them as a pollution? Or is it rather a reminder that whatever is born must die, since one Goddess presides over births and deaths? For in Delphi there is a little statue of Aphrodite of the Tomb, to which they summon the departed to come forth for the libations." ~ Plutarch, Roman Questions 23


AUC 458 / 295 BCE: Temple of Venus Opsequens dedicated in the Circus Maximus.

"During this year Q. Fabius Gurges, the consul's son, who was an aedile, brought some matrons to trial before the people on the charge of adultery. Out of their fines he obtained sufficient money to build the temple of Venus which stands near the Circus." ~ Titus Livius 10.31

"Come, glad Venus of Erycina, we pray You may come, with Love and Laughter attending on our festival." ~ Q. Horatius Flaccus, Carmen 1.5.33-34.


AUC 767 / 14 CE: Death of C. Iulius f. divus Gaius Caesar Octavianus Augustus at Nola, and the ascension of Tiberius Claudius Nero Caesar.

"Tiberius had hardly set foot in Illyricum, when he was recalled by an urgent letter from his mother; and it is not certainly known whether on reaching the town of Nola, he found Augustus still breathing or lifeless. For house and street were jealously guarded by Livia's ring of pickets, while sanguine notices were issued at intervals, until the measures dictated by the crisis had been taken: then one report announced simultaneously that Augustus had passed away and that Nero was master of the empire." ~ P. Cornelius Tacitus, Annales 1.5


AUC 985 / 232 CE: Birth of Marcus Aurelius Probus, Emperor AUC 1029-1035 (276-282 CE).

"Probus, an emperor whose rule restored to perfect safety the east, the west, the south, and the north, indeed all parts of the world. . . Probus was a native of Pannonia, of the city of Sirmium, his mother was of nobler birth than his father, his private fortune was modest, and his kindred unimportant. Both as commoner and as emperor he stood forth illustrious, famed for his virtues." ~ Historia Augusta, Life of M. Aurelius Probus Augustus 1.3; 3.1


Our thought for today is from Marcus Aurelius, Meditations 5.6:

"One man, when he has done a service to another, is ready to set it down to his account as a favor conferred. Another is not ready to do this, but still in his own mind he thinks of the man as his debtor, and he knows what he has done. A third in a manner does not even know what he has done, but he is like a vine which has produced grapes, and seeks for nothing more after it has once produced its proper fruit."




Visit Religio_Romana_Cultorum_Deorum-subscribe@yahoogroups.com
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79470 From: Publius Memmius Albucius Date: 2010-08-19
Subject: Re: Request for auspices (next Senate session)
Salve Magister,



1/ I cannot hide to you that I am a bit surprised for the dies ad IX Kal. for, having well consulted *before* the calendar that I asked to you in January and that both consuls share since, the only mention of this 24th was a "dies comitialis". You sure remember having confirmed to me on Jan. 2, that

"You may only call the Senate to assemble, begin the contio, and begin a voting period on a day that is dies fastus or dies commitialis. You cannot begin on a day that is dies nefastus; you should never begin on a day that is dies ater (That is, on days that follow the kalends, nones, or ides.)", and that you did not evoke the dies religiosi nor the fact that they may be nefastus, and therefore no more comitiales.

When checking the calendar displayed in our web site at:



http://www.novaroma.org/nr/Fasti_MMDCCLXIII



I see, before the "C" for comitialis, a "religiosus" which is hyperlinked to a page with does not specify this link religiosus-->nefastus.



So, could you :

- re-send to me and my colleague an updated calendar, with, specially, the special characteristics of the days which, being not C, F, N, NP or Atri, are considered as N for the convening of sessions of our assemblies;

- at last have with our MA these web pages updated!



2/ On the matter, I have no problem to postpone the session in order to respect this (new?) rule, from the moment you confirm that its adoption cannot be contested (available decretum).



Last on the form of our correspondence: I have already noted in June, that, when *I* addressed to you, you answered to *both consuls*. If it is not a simple style error, please answer to my colleague's requests directly to him with a copy for me, and to my requests directly to me with a copy for him. Only joint letters are to be answered jointly. Thanks.





Vale,







Albucius cos.









Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2010 18:23:18 -0700
From: mhoratius@...
Subject: Re: Request for auspices (next Senate session)
To: tau.athanasios@...; marcus.lucretius@...; albucius_aoe@...; christer.edling@...
CC: nova-roma@yahoogroups.com; novaroma-announce@yahoogroups.com; nr_senaculum@yahoogroups.com






M. Moravius Piscinus Magister Collegii Augurum P. Memmio et C. Fabio Buteone Consulibus s. p. d.

The Senate session may not be assembled on a. d. IX Kal. Sept. since that date is dies religiosum due to the opening of the mundus, and is therefore dies nefastus as well. The following day is dies nefastus piaculum due to Opiconsivia. Check the calendar that I sent you in January. The earliest date you could call the Senate therefore is to assemble on a. d. VII Kal. Sept. (26 Aug), the Gods willing.

There is no religious prohibition against beginning a vote on pridie Kal. Sept., as long as the auspices do not prohibit it. A vote should not begin on the Kalends, nor ought it to begin on the following date as that would be a dies ater. But there would be no restriction on the other dates you indicated, up to pridie Idus Sept.

I shall confer with the other Augures publici on who is available to take the auspices on your behalf.

Vadete in pace Deorum


--- On Wed, 8/18/10, Publius Memmius Albucius <albucius_aoe@...> wrote:


From: Publius Memmius Albucius <albucius_aoe@...>
Subject: Request for auspices (next Senate session)
To: "Marcus Moravius Horatius Piscinus" <mhoratius@...>, "Fabius Buteo Modianus" <tau.athanasios@...>, "Marcus Lucretius Agricola" <marcus.lucretius@...>
Cc: nova-roma@yahoogroups.com, novaroma-announce@yahoogroups.com, nr_senaculum@yahoogroups.com
Date: Wednesday, August 18, 2010, 7:37 PM




Salvete Augures,

As usual since last January, I am coming to you, so that the auspices be taken by one of you, according your choice, for the next Senate session that I intend calling for next a.d. IX Kal. Sept., with a vote beginning on pridie Kal. Sept..

I hope that, after four missed opportunities, nothing will prevent you, this time, to place your science at the service of my modest convening.

Thanks for informing me who will take the auspices, and to inform me of their result no later than next 23rd.

If ever the auspices were not favorable, I hereby inform you that I would convene the Senate for the soonest available day, this is to say for a vote on Sept. 3, or Sept. 4, or on 5 or on 7, etc.. Please therefore, in case of defavorable auspices, taking them for each of these dates until the Gods accept a favorable day.

Vobis gratias et valete tres,


P. Memmius Albucius cos.




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79471 From: publiusalbucius Date: 2010-08-19
Subject: Subscription in this Forum - censors and others
Salve Senator,

As I have been requested by two other cives to confirm or negate this information, I inform you that Censor Modianus has chosen the "no email" option inside this Forum, but that he is still present among us.

It probably means that he regularly, as I do myself, takes knowledge of the communications of our Forum directly in it, which is, as you are reminding it, a basic duty of the censors, tribunes, and all curule magistrates, and recommended to all other public magistrates and officers, religious or civil ones.


Vale Cato,


P. Memmius Albucius cos.





--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Cato" <catoinnyc@...> wrote:
>
> Cato Maiori omnibusque in foro SPD
>
> Are you serious? A censor of the Respublica is "unsubscribed" from the main venue of communication within the organization?
>
> I don't care if he despises every single citizen of ours in the world, he has a magistracy and has an obligation to be aware of what is happening. If he can't reign in his "disgust" perhaps he should resign.
>
> Valete,
>
> Cato
>
>
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "rory12001" <rory12001@> wrote:
> >
> > Salvete;
> > he'd better write to them privately, Modianus is unsubscribed from the ML he's so disgusted. wise.
> > vale
> > Maior
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79472 From: Cato Date: 2010-08-19
Subject: Re: Subscription in this Forum - censors and others
Cato Memmio Albucio consule omnibusque in foro SPD

Thank you, consul, for that clarification. I should have known not to believe anything that Maior says.

Valete,

Cato

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "publiusalbucius" <albucius_aoe@...> wrote:
>
> Salve Senator,
>
> As I have been requested by two other cives to confirm or negate this information, I inform you that Censor Modianus has chosen the "no email" option inside this Forum, but that he is still present among us.
>
> It probably means that he regularly, as I do myself, takes knowledge of the communications of our Forum directly in it, which is, as you are reminding it, a basic duty of the censors, tribunes, and all curule magistrates, and recommended to all other public magistrates and officers, religious or civil ones.
>
>
> Vale Cato,
>
>
> P. Memmius Albucius cos.
>
>
>
>
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Cato" <catoinnyc@> wrote:
> >
> > Cato Maiori omnibusque in foro SPD
> >
> > Are you serious? A censor of the Respublica is "unsubscribed" from the main venue of communication within the organization?
> >
> > I don't care if he despises every single citizen of ours in the world, he has a magistracy and has an obligation to be aware of what is happening. If he can't reign in his "disgust" perhaps he should resign.
> >
> > Valete,
> >
> > Cato
> >
> >
> >
> > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "rory12001" <rory12001@> wrote:
> > >
> > > Salvete;
> > > he'd better write to them privately, Modianus is unsubscribed from the ML he's so disgusted. wise.
> > > vale
> > > Maior
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79473 From: Publius Memmius Albucius Date: 2010-08-19
Subject: Measure of moderation
Salve Hortensia,



I was obliged to correct myself, with no delay, you assertion below, which provides a wrong information, according which Censor Modianus would not be listed in our Forum.



This affirmation may be damageable to a censor of Nova Roma, for it let think our People that Modianus censor is not interested by the opnions expressed in our Forum. You thus "have made to a third party a false and defamatory statement about a person which has damaged the dignity or reputation of that person" (lex Salicia poenalis).



As such, and in the absence of any previous illegal action of this censor, which would have explained or allowed your affirmation, such inexact information cannot be accepted in this Forum.



You are thus placed under moderation for 72 hours.



I let the censors appreciate the necessity, if they see fit, of any nota.



Vale,




P. Memmius Albucius
cos. p. pr.





--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "rory12001" <rory12001@...> wrote:
>
> Salvete;
> he'd better write to them privately, Modianus is unsubscribed from the ML he's so disgusted. wise.
> vale
> Maior


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79474 From: David Kling Date: 2010-08-19
Subject: Re: Measure of moderation
Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus Publio Memmio Albucio salutem dicit

A nota for doing what? Stating that I am not following the main list? I'm
not unsubscribed, but am set to no mail. I am tired of the incessant
insults; therefore, have decided to take a break from it. Marca Hortensia
Mair has done nothing wrong with her statement. Your comments to her are
unfounded. Do not bring me into your pettiness.

Vale;

Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus

2010/8/19 Publius Memmius Albucius <albucius_aoe@...>

> Salve Hortensia,
>
> I was obliged to correct myself, with no delay, you assertion below, which
> provides a wrong information, according which Censor Modianus would not be
> listed in our Forum.
>
> This affirmation may be damageable to a censor of Nova Roma, for it let
> think our People that Modianus censor is not interested by the opnions
> expressed in our Forum. You thus "have made to a third party a false and
> defamatory statement about a person which has damaged the dignity or
> reputation of that person" (lex Salicia poenalis).
>
> As such, and in the absence of any previous illegal action of this censor,
> which would have explained or allowed your affirmation, such inexact
> information cannot be accepted in this Forum.
>
> You are thus placed under moderation for 72 hours.
>
> I let the censors appreciate the necessity, if they see fit, of any nota.
>
> Vale,
>
>
> P. Memmius Albucius
> cos. p. pr.
>
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "rory12001" <rory12001@...> wrote:
> >
> > Salvete;
> > he'd better write to them privately, Modianus is unsubscribed from the
> ML he's so disgusted. wise.
> > vale
> > Maior
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79475 From: publiusalbucius Date: 2010-08-19
Subject: Re: Measure of moderation
Modiano censori s.d.

>I'm not unsubscribed, but am set to no mail. I am tired of the >incessant insults; therefore, have decided to take a break from it.

Yes, this exactly what I have reminded, Censor.

>Marca Hortensia Mair has done nothing wrong with her statement. >Your comments to her are unfounded.

I do not think so, dear Censor.

>Do not bring me into your pettiness.

Please do not confuse difference of opinion in the application of our law and "pettiness". And am I wrong or did *you* write "I am tired of the incessant insults"?

This said, what I can conclude from your message is that you do not consider yourself, as individual, defamed by Hortensia's words.

I take notice of it and therefore decide here to reduce her measure of moderation from 72 to 48 hours, the "false statement" remaining.

Vale,


Albucius cos.


--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, David Kling <tau.athanasios@...> wrote:
>
> Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus Publio Memmio Albucio salutem dicit
>
> A nota for doing what? Stating that I am not following the main list? I'm
> not unsubscribed, but am set to no mail. I am tired of the incessant
> insults; therefore, have decided to take a break from it. Marca Hortensia
> Mair has done nothing wrong with her statement. Your comments to her are
> unfounded. Do not bring me into your pettiness.
>
> Vale;
>
> Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus
>
> 2010/8/19 Publius Memmius Albucius <albucius_aoe@...>
>
> > Salve Hortensia,
> >
> > I was obliged to correct myself, with no delay, you assertion below, which
> > provides a wrong information, according which Censor Modianus would not be
> > listed in our Forum.
> >
> > This affirmation may be damageable to a censor of Nova Roma, for it let
> > think our People that Modianus censor is not interested by the opnions
> > expressed in our Forum. You thus "have made to a third party a false and
> > defamatory statement about a person which has damaged the dignity or
> > reputation of that person" (lex Salicia poenalis).
> >
> > As such, and in the absence of any previous illegal action of this censor,
> > which would have explained or allowed your affirmation, such inexact
> > information cannot be accepted in this Forum.
> >
> > You are thus placed under moderation for 72 hours.
> >
> > I let the censors appreciate the necessity, if they see fit, of any nota.
> >
> > Vale,
> >
> >
> > P. Memmius Albucius
> > cos. p. pr.
> >
> >
> > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "rory12001" <rory12001@> wrote:
> > >
> > > Salvete;
> > > he'd better write to them privately, Modianus is unsubscribed from the
> > ML he's so disgusted. wise.
> > > vale
> > > Maior
> >
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79476 From: C.Maria Caeca Date: 2010-08-19
Subject: Re: Women in Nova Roma
C. Maria Caeca L. Cornelio Sullae Felici omnibusque in foro S. P. D.

First, Senator, thank you for extending this conversation to the whole NR community. I think it is well worth discussing, and while I do realize that some here have very strong views on this matter, on both ends of the spectrum, I trust that we can hold this discussion with both honesty and courtesy.

I cannot address this question with a simple "yes" or "no" because, when speaking of people, their actions and motivations (about which we can only speculate, at best), matters become more complicated. So, I will begin by talking about what I know best ...my own experience in NR.

With some glaring exceptions (with which I dealt at the time), I have been treated here with respect, courtesy, and even kindness from those from whom I least expected it. I don't think, however, that this has anything to do with the fact that I am a woman, and I devoutly hope it does not. I think it has to do with the way I conduct myself, and the way that I treat others. I have found out that one really does get back what one sends out, often in far greater measure.

However. I have never tried to obtain a high office ...or competed for something that any of our more prominent and powerful male citizens want. Whether doing so would change the way I am treated remains to be seen, but I can envision it doing so. I have heard, and I have reason to believe, that a very small minority of our gentlemen are perfectly willing to accept the presence of women citizens, so long as they remember that they are innately inferiors and are willing to remain subservient. (I'm not, and I won't). We are perfectly welcome to do those jobs they consider menial or beneath their dignity ...but if we should dare to run for, say Praetor or Consul, then we would be considered presumptuous. Luckily, that group is *extremely* small, as demonstrated by at least 1 successful female consul, and by the election of 3 female Praetrices, one of whom was successful, and, quite possibly, would have returned to office to fulfill the remainder of the current term.

I do think that, often, it is more likely that our male citizens will be taken more seriously when discussing serious matters, especially Governmental matters, though I cannot prove that viewpoint. I also think (and this I find especially unfortunate) that, when in debate, men argue with other men about issues, and no matter how heated the debate, it tends to remain (with some rather spectacular exceptions)issue related. On the other hand, if a woman debates an issue with a man, and it gets heated, then it is all too likely that there will come a time when insults are exchanged, and the insults that the woman will be expected to absorb are, directly or indirectly, of a sexual or gender nature.

This, of course, is not limited to NR, nor are some of the other things I have mentioned above. In short, I think we reflect the way the world pretty much is, and actually, I don't think we do a terribly bad job about treating our female citizens well ...again, with some truly egregious exceptions, although, I will also say that what I am thinking of did *not* occur on this, or on any other NR sponsored list.

While, yes, I have been insulted, once 3 times in a 2 line private email, and the insults were gender specific, I repeat, and I cannot say this firmly enough, that most of my fellow male citizens have been respectful, courteous, and sometimes, even kind, and I happily return that respect, in kind.

As to the 2nd part of your question ...I don't think this issue needs to have anything "done" about it. We treat one another in the ways we do because of our attitudes and perceptions, and the only ones who can do something about *those* are us. (sorry for the Grammatical tangle!). This is not something that can come from without, but must, and will, eventually, come from within ourselves, and, as you say, there are other crucial issues that need our attention. All I would hope is that *all* NR citizens, regardless of gender, will attend carefully, evaluate objectively, and make their decisions without reference to whether the name making a proposal ends with a "US" or an "a" (and yes, there are exceptions to *that* to, as I well know, smiles).

Again thank you for opening this to all NR citizens to discuss.

Respectfully,
C. Maria Caeca

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79477 From: Gaius Petronius Dexter Date: 2010-08-20
Subject: Tribunician report for July/August session of the Senate.
Avete!

Here the tribunician report of the Senate session (July 26 - August 1st).
C. Petronius Dexter tribune of the Plebs reporting.

------------------------------------------
- Session begun at 14:00 hour, a.d. VII Kal. Sextiles 2763 auc (July 26, 2010 c.c.) ; closed at 18:00 hour Kal. Sextiles (August 1st)
- Contio begun at 15:00 hour, a.d. VII Kal. Sextiles (July 26) ; closed at 15:00 hour a.d. III Kal. Sextiles (July 30)
- Vote begun: 16:30 hour, a.d. III Kal. Sextiles (July 30); closed at 16:30 hour, Kal. Sextiles (August 1st)
-------------------------------------------

The following XI (11) members, included Censorius Laenas, cast a vote:

Consul:
*PMA* P. Memmius Albucius

Censorii.
*DIPI* D. Iunius Palladius Invictus
*LCSF* L. Cornelius Sulla Felix
*TiGP* Ti. Galerius Paulinus
*CPL* C. Popillius Laenas

Consulares.
*QFM* Q. Fabius Maximus
*TIS* T. Iulius Sabinus

Praetorii.
*CEC* C. Equitius Cato
*ATS* A. Tullia Scholastica

Aedilicii.
*CnIC* Cn. Iulius Caesar

Tribunicii.
*QSP* Q. Suetonius Paulinus

The following senators XIX (19) did not vote:
*AMA* Arn. Moravia Aurelia
*CCS* C. Curius Saturninus
*CFD* C. Flavius Diocletianus
*CMM* C. Marius Merullus
*CNEM* Cn. Equitius Marinus
*CVA* C. Vipsanius Agrippa
*EmCF* Em. Curia Finnica
*FlGA* Fl. Galerius Aurelianus
*FrAC* Fr. Apulus Caesar
*KFBM* K. Fabius Buteo Modianus
*KFBQ* K. Fabius Buteo Quintilianus
*MAM* M. Arminius Maior
*MCC* M. Curatius Complutensis
*MHM* M. Hortensia Maior
*MIP* M. Iulius Perusianus
*MIS* M. Iulius Severus
*MLA* M. Lucretius Agricola
*MMA* M. Minucius Audens
*MMPH* M. Moravius Piscinus Horatianus


On the 30 members allowed to cast a vote, 10 members expressed a vote on each of the items.

No absence of quorum having been stated according the Senate internal regulations, the quorum was reached.

A majority of six (6) votes was required in order an item be declared as adopted.

----------------------------------------------
"UTI ROGAS" means a vote in favor of an item.
"ANTIQVO" is a vote against.
"ABSTINEO" is an open abstention.

-----------------------------

RELATIO


Item I - Praetores - appointment - senatus consultum ultimum
(discussion + vote)

The last comitia centuriata, which intended replacing our both praetors, has been declared void because of the absence of centuria praerogativa. We thus have no praetors since mid-June and, even if the consul maior, by interim, is currently acting pro praetoribus, such situation must reasonably cease as soon as possible. Considering the difficulties of last comitia and the fact that elections, besides the preparation time required for them, may not be conducted via our current IT system, the most efficient way to fill our praetura is the senatus consultum ultimum.
In view of the Constitution in its articles IV.A.5 and V.E, respectively relative to the election of praetors and of the issue of senatus consulta ;
Considering the importance filling the position of praetors and the context and grounds reminded above;

the Senate of Rome decides:
Article 1 : The consul maior is invested of the absolute power to fill himself, by derogation of the article IV.A.5 of the Constitution, the currently vacant magistracies of praetors. This power is submitted to the veto of the consul minor.

Article 2 - This appointment shall respect the order stated by Diribitor Arminius on pr. Nonas Quint. 2763 (July 6, 2010) acting in the frame of the last Comitia centuriata finally declared void for absence of previous selection of a centuria praerogativa, which is :
1. A. Tullia Scholastica or P. Ullerius Venator
2. A. Tullia Scholastica or P. Ullerius Venator
3. Ti. Galerius Paulinus
4. Q. Fabius Maximus

being reminded that former candidate M. Hortensia Maior cannot, by judicial sentence, hold any office and magistracy until next Kal. Ian. 2764 auc.

Article 3 - The consuls are charged of the good execution of the present senatus consultum, which shall be applicable from its publication on, and be included in the Tabularium Nova Romae (Senate section).
--------------------------------------

ITEM I : PASSED, by
VTI ROGAS: 10
ABSTINEO: 1.

Detail and comments:

*PMA*: VTI ROGAS.
*DIPI*: VTI ROGAS. The top two names mentioned were the top vote getters and are both excellent choices. It's a shame an SCU is necessary but it is the best method available to us.
*LCSF*: VTI ROGAS.
*TGP*: I do not like voting for an SCU any more than I would voting to appoint a dictator. In the firm believe that our senior Consul has the best interest of the republic at heart I vote as follows. UR.
*CPL*: VTI ROGAS.
*QFM*: VTI ROGAS.
*TIS*: VTI ROGAS. Approving a SCU to appoint by edictum consularis, under your control, our 2 praetors suffecti, on the base of the elements stated by the diribitors.
*CEC*: VTI ROGAS.
*ATS*: ABSTINEO. Apart from the fact that I dislike the overuse of the SCU, I must abstain on this for reasons which should be evident.
*CnIC*:VTI ROGAS.
*QSP*: VTI ROGAS.

------------------------------
Item II - Electoral legal system - senatus consultum ultimum
(discussion + vote)

In view of the Constitution in its article V.E, relative to the issue of senatus consulta ;

Considering the difficulties currently met in the working of the electoral IT tools, and the fact that Nova Roma institutions must not depend on any external system which would prevent them working normally ;
Considering that it is necessary to set a temporary system, as simple as possible, that would not depend on any external or technical assistance, but will work in the normal frame of Nova Roma daily channels of communication ;
Considering that the setting of this temporary system and its working, in the coming months, will allow the necessary steps to be made in the IT matter so that appropriate measures be presented, with both consuls' previous approbation, to the Senate, and that the choice of the most appropriate electoral tool (electronic, IT one, others) be made by the Curia ;
Considering it is necessary, for this, to adapt our existing laws to set this simple and efficient system ;

the Senate of Rome decides:

Article 1 : The consul maior is invested of the absolute power to modify, by edictum, the current legislation relative to the electoral system of Nova Roma (tools, proceedings, etc.) in order to adapt it to the creation of an electoral system which, as simple and efficient as possible, will allow Nova Roma institutions, and specially its comitia, to go on working normally without the assistance of the current IT system.

Article 2 : This investment is limited in time and will last no more than thirty (30) days from the publication of the current senatus consultum ultimum by the presiding magistrate. The application of the electoral system set by the consular edictum is temporary and shall not last later than the date set in the consular edictum and, at worst, than pridie Kal. Ianuarias 2764 auc.
At the end of this temporary period, the legislation shall come back to its current state or in the state that new legally adopted provisions would
have defined.

Article 3 - The power given in the article 1 is submitted to the veto of the
consul minor.

Article 4 - The consuls are charged of the good execution of the present senatus
consultum, which shall be applicable from its publication on, and be included in the Tabularium Nova Romae (Senate section).

--------------------------------------------------------
ITEM II : PASSED.
VTI ROGAS: 10.
ANTIQVO: 1.

Detail and comments:

*PMA*: VTI ROGAS.
*DIP*I: VTI ROGAS. Again, the SCU is the best method available to us to fix this problem until the Senate can fix the IT situation.
*LCSF*: VTI ROGAS.
*TGP*: VTI ROGAS.
*CPL*: UR. I regret the need to resort to the SCU. It sometimes seems that Nova Roma is recreating the last days of the ancient Roman
Republic.
*QFM*: VTI ROGAS.
*TIS*: VTI ROGAS. Approving a SCU on the adaptation of our laws so that we may organize elections normally and not being dependent of the IT tool, and during the time needed to fix our IT system and decide which functions it will answer to.
*CEC*:VTI ROGAS.
*ATS*: ANTIQVO. It is my understanding that Consul Albucius wishes to use e-mail to register our votes. Yahoo has just shown us how dreadfully unreliable this method is. Even now, five days later, messages are coming in out of order, and some appear to be missing altogether. Moreover, this violates the expectation of privacy we in the modern world have with regard to our votes in other than legislative assemblies. If Pius is willing to create a proper cista for the elections, I see no reason for this change. Let us hold a proper, unvetoed, Senate session with correct auspices, and vote on the IT issue as well as the other matters, and let us resolve this as well as the other issues once and for all.
*CnIC*: VTI ROGAS. Oh I really dislike doing this. I hate the other side for forcing us to take this extraordinary step.
*QSP*: VTI ROGAS.
----------------------------------------------------------

Optime valete,

C. Petronius Dexter
Tribunus Plebis Arcoiali scribebat
A.d XIII Kalendas Septembres P. Memmio K. Fabio II coss.



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79478 From: mcorvvs Date: 2010-08-20
Subject: Re: FERIAE PROV. SARMATIAE NOVAE ROMANAE II
Salve Maior,

thanks for kind words. We did all this for our Res Publica...

Vale bene,

CORVVS

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "rory12001" <rory12001@...> wrote:
>
> Salve Corve;
> your boys are gorgeous:) Actually all the wedding couples were beautiful. Those pictures are so inspiring!
>
>
> >
> > Salve Corvus!
> >
> > Gratias, gratias, gratias!
> > I am also going to present them at the North American Conventus as well -
> >
> > I really enjoyed the photos of your sons mixing up their togas, they are such handsome young gentleman!
> >
> > Vale bene,
> >
> > Julia
> >
> > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "mcorvvs" <mcorvvs@> wrote:
> > >
> > > Salve Aquilae,
> > >
> > > sure you can! This is what it was actually made for! :) It will especially be pleasant for me since your meeting will be in Nashville, the city of Parthenon!
> > > And many thanks for congratulations!
> > >
> > > Optime vale,
> > >
> > > CORVVS
> > >
> > > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "luciaiuliaaquila" <luciaiuliaaquila@> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Salve Corvus Amice,
> > > >
> > > > I also just looked at the newest photos added today! They are magnificent.
> > > > May i have your permission to share them at the next meeting at Aedes Venus Genetrix here in Nashville? They are so informative in addition to being so beautiful!
> > > > Thank for this gift and congratulations!
> > > >
> > > > Cura ut valeas,
> > > >
> > > > Julia
> > > >
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79479 From: marcushoratius Date: 2010-08-20
Subject: a. d. XIII Kalendas Septembris: On Thunder, Kisses, and Knees
M. Moravius Piscinus Pontifex Maximus Quiritibus cultoribus Deorum et omnibus salutem plurimam dicit: Diis bene iuvantibus sumus.

Hodie est ante diem XIII Kalendas Septembres; haec dies comitialis est:

ON THUNDER

"According to your view, long-continued observation is employed in the case of lightning, and reason and conjecture are generally employed in the case of portents. But what is it that has been observed in the case of lightning? The Etruscans divided the sky into sixteen parts. Of course it was easy enough for them to double the four parts into which we divide it and then double that total and tell from which one of those divisions a bolt of lightning had come. In the first place, what difference does its location make? and, in the second place, what does it foretell? It is perfectly evident that, out of the wonder and fear excited in primitive man by lightning and thunderbolts, sprang his belief that those phenomena were caused by omnipotent Jove. And so we find it recorded in our augural annals: 'When Jove thunders or lightens it is impious to hold an election.' This was ordained, perhaps, from reasons of political expediency; for our ancestors wished to have some excuse for not holding elections sometimes. And so lightning is an unfavorable sign only in case of an election; in all other cases we consider it the best of auspices, if it appears on the left side." ~ M. Tullius Cicero, De Divinatione 2.18 (42-43)


WHY THUNDER IS ASCRIBED TO JUPITER. "It is not generally known, what has been discovered by men who are the most eminent for their learning, in consequence of their assiduous observations of the heavens, that the fires which fall upon the earth, and receive the name of thunder-bolts, proceed from these three particular stars (the planets Saturn, Jupiter, and Mars), but principally from the one which is situated in the middle (sphere). It may perhaps depend on the superabundance of moisture from the superior orbit communicating with the heat from the inferior, which are expelled in this manner; and hence it is commonly said, the thunder-bolts are darted by Jupiter. And as, in burning wood, the burnt part is cast off with a crackling noise, so does the star throw off this celestial fire, bearing the omens of future events, even the part which is thrown off not losing its divine operation. And this takes place more particularly when the air is in an unsettled state, either because the moisture which is then collected excites the greatest quantity of fire, or because the air is disturbed, as if by the parturition of the pregnant star." ~ C. Plinius Secundus, Historia Naturalis 2.18. (20.)

THE ETRURIAN AND THE ROMAN OBSERVATIONS ON THESE POINTS. "The Tuscan books inform us, that there are nine Gods who discharge thunder-storms, that there are eleven different kinds of them, and that three of them are darted out by Jupiter. Of these the Romans retained only two, ascribing the diurnal kind to Jupiter, and the nocturnal to Summanus; this latter kind being more rare, in consequence of the heavens being colder, as was mentioned above. The Etrurians also suppose, that those which are named Infernal burst out of the ground; they are produced in the winter and are particularly fierce and direful, as all things are which proceed from the earth, and are not generated by or proceeding from the stars, but from a cause which is near at hand, and of a more disorderly nature. As a proof of this it is said, that all those which proceed from the higher regions strike obliquely, while those which are termed terrestrial strike in a direct line. And because these fall from matter which is nearer to us, they are supposed to proceed from the earth, since they leave no traces of a rebound; this being the effect of a stroke coming not from below, but from an opposite quarter. Those who have searched into the subject more minutely suppose, that these come from the planet Saturn, as those that are of a burning nature do from Mars. In this way it was that Volsinium, the most opulent town of the Tuscans, was entirely consumed by lightning. The first of these strokes that a man receives, after he has come into possession of any property, is termed Familiar, and is supposed to prognosticate the events of the whole of his life. But it is not generally supposed that they predict events of a private nature for a longer space than ten years, unless they happen at the time of a first marriage or a birth-day; nor that public predictions extend beyond thirty years, unless with respect to the founding of colonies." ~ C. Plinius Secundus, Historia Naturalis, 2. 53. (138)


"We regard lightning on the left as a most favorable omen for everything except for an election, and this exception was made, no doubt, from reasons of political expediency so that the rulers of the State would be the judges of the regularity of an election, whether held to pass judgments in criminal cases, or to enact laws, or to elect magistrates." ~ M. Tullius Cicero, De Divinatione 2.35 (74-75)


"'It thundered on the left.' The left, prosperous, because it is heavenly; {for our right is the Gods' left] as we said above. 'Left' (sinistrum), moreover comes from 'to allow' (sino), in as much as it pertains to augury, because it allows us to do something {whence elsewhere Vergil says 'if favorable deities (laeua numina) allow anyone' [G. 4.6-7]. But here the doctrine of the pontiffs is introduced. For when Anchises wanted to follow his son in flight, Vergil shows him moved by the Gods to seek from the sky confirmation of the omen that presented itself in place of an auspice above Ascanius' head; for he adds, 'the elder had scarcely spoken and immediately it thundered on the left.'" ~ Servius, Aen. 2.693


OSCULUM

"Why do the women kiss their kinsmen on the lips? Is it, as most authorities believe, that the drinking of wine was forbidden to women, and therefore, so that women who had drunk wine should not escape detection, but should be detected when they chanced to meet men of their household, the custom of kissing was established? Or is it for the reason which Aristotle the philosopher has recorded? For that far-famed deed, the scene of which is laid in many different places, was dared, it appears, by the Trojan women, even on the very shores of Italy. For when they had reached the coast, and the men had disembarked, the women set fire to the ships, since, at all hazards, they desired to be quit of their wanderings and their sea-faring. But they were afraid of their husbands, and greeted with a kiss and a warm embrace such of their kinsmen and members of their household as they encountered; and when the men had ceased from their wrath and had become reconciled, the women continued thereafter as well to employ this mark of affection towards them. Or was this rather bestowed upon the women as a privilege that should bring them both honor and power if they should be seen to have many good men among their kinsmen and in their household? Or is it that, since it is not the custom for men to marry blood relations, affection proceeded only so far as a kiss, and this alone remained as a token of kinship and a participation therein? For formerly men did not marry women related to them by ties of blood, just as even now they do not marry their aunts or their sisters; but after a long time they made the concession of allowing wedlock with cousins for the following reason: a man possessed of no property, but otherwise of excellent character and more satisfactory to the people than other public men, had as wife his cousin, an heiress, and was thought to be growing rich from her estate. He was accused on this ground, but the people would not even try the case and dismissed the charge, enacting a decree that all might marry cousins or more distant relatives; but marriage with nearer kin was prohibited." ~ Plutarch, Roman Questions 6


ON THE KNEES

"In accordance with the usages of various nations, certain religious ideas have been attached to the knees. It is the knees that suppliants clasp, and it is to these that they extend their hands; it is the knees that they worship like so many altars, as it were; perhaps, because in them is centred the vital strength. For in the joint of either knee, the right as well as the left, there is on the fore-side of each a certain empty space, which bears a strong resemblance to a mouth, and through which, like the throat, if it is once pierced, the vital powers escape. There are also certain religious ideas attached to other parts of the body, as is testified in raising the back of the right hand to the lips, and extending it as a token of good faith. It was the custom of the ancient Greeks, when in the act of supplication, to touch the chin. The seat of the memory lies in the lower part of the ear, which we touch when we summon a witness to depose upon memory to an arrest. The seat, too, of Nemesis lies behind the right ear, a Goddess which has never yet found a Latin name, no, not in the Capitol even. It is to this part that we apply the finger next the little finger, after touching the mouth with it, when we silently ask pardon of the Gods for having let slip an indiscreet word." ~ C. Plinius Secundus, Historia Naturalis 11.103 (254)


Today's thought comes from Democritus, The Golden Sentences 12:

"It is the province of a magnanimous man to bear with mildness the errors of others."




Visit Religio_Romana_Cultorum_Deorum-subscribe@yahoogroups.com
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79480 From: Gaius Petronius Dexter Date: 2010-08-20
Subject: Re: Tribunician report for July/August session of the Senate.[Correc
Avete!

In the precedent report I made an error in the comments.
I marked comments of Q. Fabius Maximus as Cn. Iulius Caesar's.
This version is the correct report.

------------------------

Here the tribunician report of the Senate session (July 26 - August 1st).
C. Petronius Dexter tribune of the Plebs reporting.

------------------------------------------
- Session begun at 14:00 hour, a.d. VII Kal. Sextiles 2763 auc (July 26, 2010 c.c.) ; closed at 18:00 hour Kal. Sextiles (August 1st)
- Contio begun at 15:00 hour, a.d. VII Kal. Sextiles (July 26) ; closed at 15:00 hour a.d. III Kal. Sextiles (July 30)
- Vote begun: 16:30 hour, a.d. III Kal. Sextiles (July 30); closed at 16:30 hour, Kal. Sextiles (August 1st)
-------------------------------------------

The following XI (11) members, included Censorius Laenas, cast a vote:

Consul:
*PMA* P. Memmius Albucius

Censorii.
*DIPI* D. Iunius Palladius Invictus
*LCSF* L. Cornelius Sulla Felix
*TiGP* Ti. Galerius Paulinus
*CPL* C. Popillius Laenas

Consulares.
*QFM* Q. Fabius Maximus
*TIS* T. Iulius Sabinus

Praetorii.
*CEC* C. Equitius Cato
*ATS* A. Tullia Scholastica

Aedilicii.
*CnIC* Cn. Iulius Caesar

Tribunicii.
*QSP* Q. Suetonius Paulinus

The following senators XIX (19) did not vote:
*AMA* Arn. Moravia Aurelia
*CCS* C. Curius Saturninus
*CFD* C. Flavius Diocletianus
*CMM* C. Marius Merullus
*CNEM* Cn. Equitius Marinus
*CVA* C. Vipsanius Agrippa
*EmCF* Em. Curia Finnica
*FlGA* Fl. Galerius Aurelianus
*FrAC* Fr. Apulus Caesar
*KFBM* K. Fabius Buteo Modianus
*KFBQ* K. Fabius Buteo Quintilianus
*MAM* M. Arminius Maior
*MCC* M. Curatius Complutensis
*MHM* M. Hortensia Maior
*MIP* M. Iulius Perusianus
*MIS* M. Iulius Severus
*MLA* M. Lucretius Agricola
*MMA* M. Minucius Audens
*MMPH* M. Moravius Piscinus Horatianus


On the 30 members allowed to cast a vote, 10 members expressed a vote on each of the items.

No absence of quorum having been stated according the Senate internal regulations, the quorum was reached.

A majority of six (6) votes was required in order an item be declared as adopted.

----------------------------------------------
"UTI ROGAS" means a vote in favor of an item.
"ANTIQVO" is a vote against.
"ABSTINEO" is an open abstention.

-----------------------------

RELATIO


Item I - Praetores - appointment - senatus consultum ultimum
(discussion + vote)

The last comitia centuriata, which intended replacing our both praetors, has been declared void because of the absence of centuria praerogativa. We thus have no praetors since mid-June and, even if the consul maior, by interim, is currently acting pro praetoribus, such situation must reasonably cease as soon as possible. Considering the difficulties of last comitia and the fact that elections, besides the preparation time required for them, may not be conducted via our current IT system, the most efficient way to fill our praetura is the senatus consultum ultimum.
In view of the Constitution in its articles IV.A.5 and V.E, respectively relative to the election of praetors and of the issue of senatus consulta ;
Considering the importance filling the position of praetors and the context and grounds reminded above;

the Senate of Rome decides:
Article 1 : The consul maior is invested of the absolute power to fill himself, by derogation of the article IV.A.5 of the Constitution, the currently vacant magistracies of praetors. This power is submitted to the veto of the consul minor.

Article 2 - This appointment shall respect the order stated by Diribitor Arminius on pr. Nonas Quint. 2763 (July 6, 2010) acting in the frame of the last Comitia centuriata finally declared void for absence of previous selection of a centuria praerogativa, which is :
1. A. Tullia Scholastica or P. Ullerius Venator
2. A. Tullia Scholastica or P. Ullerius Venator
3. Ti. Galerius Paulinus
4. Q. Fabius Maximus

being reminded that former candidate M. Hortensia Maior cannot, by judicial sentence, hold any office and magistracy until next Kal. Ian. 2764 auc.

Article 3 - The consuls are charged of the good execution of the present senatus consultum, which shall be applicable from its publication on, and be included in the Tabularium Nova Romae (Senate section).
--------------------------------------

ITEM I : PASSED, by
VTI ROGAS: 10
ABSTINEO: 1.

Detail and comments:

*PMA*: VTI ROGAS.
*DIPI*: VTI ROGAS. The top two names mentioned were the top vote getters and are both excellent choices. It's a shame an SCU is necessary but it is the best method available to us.
*LCSF*: VTI ROGAS.
*TGP*: I do not like voting for an SCU any more than I would voting to appoint a dictator. In the firm believe that our senior Consul has the best interest of the republic at heart I vote as follows. UR.
*CPL*: VTI ROGAS.
*QFM*: VTI ROGAS. Oh I really dislike doing this. I hate the other side for forcing us to take this extraordinary step.
*TIS*: VTI ROGAS. Approving a SCU to appoint by edictum consularis, under your control, our 2 praetors suffecti, on the base of the elements stated by the diribitors.
*CEC*: VTI ROGAS.
*ATS*: ABSTINEO. Apart from the fact that I dislike the overuse of the SCU, I must abstain on this for reasons which should be evident.
*CnIC*:VTI ROGAS.
*QSP*: VTI ROGAS.

------------------------------
Item II - Electoral legal system - senatus consultum ultimum
(discussion + vote)

In view of the Constitution in its article V.E, relative to the issue of senatus consulta ;

Considering the difficulties currently met in the working of the electoral IT tools, and the fact that Nova Roma institutions must not depend on any external system which would prevent them working normally ;
Considering that it is necessary to set a temporary system, as simple as possible, that would not depend on any external or technical assistance, but will work in the normal frame of Nova Roma daily channels of communication ;
Considering that the setting of this temporary system and its working, in the coming months, will allow the necessary steps to be made in the IT matter so that appropriate measures be presented, with both consuls' previous approbation, to the Senate, and that the choice of the most appropriate electoral tool (electronic, IT one, others) be made by the Curia ;
Considering it is necessary, for this, to adapt our existing laws to set this simple and efficient system ;

the Senate of Rome decides:

Article 1 : The consul maior is invested of the absolute power to modify, by edictum, the current legislation relative to the electoral system of Nova Roma (tools, proceedings, etc.) in order to adapt it to the creation of an electoral system which, as simple and efficient as possible, will allow Nova Roma institutions, and specially its comitia, to go on working normally without the assistance of the current IT system.

Article 2 : This investment is limited in time and will last no more than thirty (30) days from the publication of the current senatus consultum ultimum by the presiding magistrate. The application of the electoral system set by the consular edictum is temporary and shall not last later than the date set in the consular edictum and, at worst, than pridie Kal. Ianuarias 2764 auc.
At the end of this temporary period, the legislation shall come back to its current state or in the state that new legally adopted provisions would
have defined.

Article 3 - The power given in the article 1 is submitted to the veto of the
consul minor.

Article 4 - The consuls are charged of the good execution of the present senatus
consultum, which shall be applicable from its publication on, and be included in the Tabularium Nova Romae (Senate section).

--------------------------------------------------------
ITEM II : PASSED.
VTI ROGAS: 10.
ANTIQVO: 1.

Detail and comments:

*PMA*: VTI ROGAS.
*DIP*I: VTI ROGAS. Again, the SCU is the best method available to us to fix this problem until the Senate can fix the IT situation.
*LCSF*: VTI ROGAS.
*TGP*: VTI ROGAS.
*CPL*: UR. I regret the need to resort to the SCU. It sometimes seems that Nova Roma is recreating the last days of the ancient Roman
Republic.
*QFM*: VTI ROGAS.
*TIS*: VTI ROGAS. Approving a SCU on the adaptation of our laws so that we may organize elections normally and not being dependent of the IT tool, and during the time needed to fix our IT system and decide which functions it will answer to.
*CEC*:VTI ROGAS.
*ATS*: ANTIQVO. It is my understanding that Consul Albucius wishes to use e-mail to register our votes. Yahoo has just shown us how dreadfully unreliable this method is. Even now, five days later, messages are coming in out of order, and some appear to be missing altogether. Moreover, this violates the expectation of privacy we in the modern world have with regard to our votes in other than legislative assemblies. If Pius is willing to create a proper cista for the elections, I see no reason for this change. Let us hold a proper, unvetoed, Senate session with correct auspices, and vote on the IT issue as well as the other matters, and let us resolve this as well as the other issues once and for all.
*CnIC*: VTI ROGAS.
*QSP*: VTI ROGAS.
----------------------------------------------------------

Optime valete,

C. Petronius Dexter
Tribunus Plebis Arcoiali scribebat
A.d XIII Kalendas Septembres P. Memmio K. Fabio II coss.



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79481 From: mcorvvs Date: 2010-08-21
Subject: Intercessio
Ex officio M. Octavi tribuni plebis,

I issue intercessio on the July\August Senate session that consul Albucius convened without favorable auspices in violation of: The Decretum collegii pontificum et augurum de iure auspicandi et tripudio and Report of this Session issued by Tribunus Dexter.
The Senate session is vetoed, the consul Albucius convened the session without favorable auspices in violation of:
The Decretum collegii pontificum et augurum de iure auspicandi et tripudio which can be found here:
http://www.novaroma.org/nr/Decretum_collegii_pontificum_et_augurum_de_iure_auspicandi_et_tripudio_(Nova_Roma)
This decretum specifies ius auspicandi for magistrates along with limitations to the ius auspicandi. Assuming that Consul Albucius is a "practitioner" of the religio romana as defined by the decretum the following clause applies, "A curule magistrate who is a practitioner of the Religio Romana, but not an augur, pontifex, flamen, sacerdos, or pullarius, shall submit a written report of any auspication he has taken and his interpretation thereof to the Collegium Augurum for verification that vitium has not occurred in the auspication." His ius auspicandi is limited and the following clause places final authority regarding auspices upon the Collegium Augurum, "In the event that the curule magistrate shall dispute interpretation of the auspication, the curule magistrate may appeal to the Collegium Augurum for ultimate interpretation of the auspication."
The Collegium Augurum removed the ius auspicandi he once had:
PARS III
DECRETUM AUGURUM DE TRIPUDIO INRITO
, states, "Consul P. Memmius Albucius, having violated augural law, is hereby disallowed from taking any further auspicia on public matters until the Collegium Augurum determines that his procedures conform to the requirements set by that body." Then we need to revisit Decretum collegii pontificum et augurum de iure auspciandi et tripudio which states, "It shall constitute an offence of impietas prudens dolo malo for a curule magistrate to knowingly convene a meeting of the Comitia Centuriata, Comitia Populi Tributa, or the Senate without performance of a valid auspication."

This is why the Collegium Pontificum recently voted to declare Consul Albucius guilty of impietas prudens dolo malo.

PARS III

It is the determination of the Collegium Augurum that Consul P. Memmius Albucius
has not and does not perform tripudia in a proper and accepted manner. He was
not granted any privilege of auspicium by the Comitia Curiata, and indeed there
is no provision in Nova Roma law for any magistrate to hold auspicium. Only
where a magistrate is himself an augur publicus, or where he is under the direct
supervision of an augur publicus, may a magistrate take his own auspicia. Never
may one magistrate take auspices instead for another magistrate unless he is
himself an augur publicus and acting in that capacity. Consul P. Memmius
Albucius, having violated augural law, is hereby disallowed from taking any
further auspicia on public matters until the Collegium Augurum determines that
his procedures conform to the requirements set by that body.
--

Valete bene,

CORVVS
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79482 From: Gaius Tullius Valerianus Date: 2010-08-21
Subject: Re: Intercessio
Salve Corve,

Perhaps I am missing something, but I don't think you can forbid him to
do something that he has already done. The session already happened, you
can't now forbid it to proceed. On the other hand, the implementation of
the *results *of the session (e.g. the appointment of the new *praetores *could
be vetoed, and actually already has been by consul Quintilianus.
I hope you do not take offense at my words, Corve, but I don't think
you can do what you are trying to do!

Vale,
~ Valerianus

On Sat, Aug 21, 2010 at 1:01 AM, mcorvvs <mcorvvs@...> wrote:

>
>
> Ex officio M. Octavi tribuni plebis,
>
> I issue intercessio on the July\August Senate session that consul Albucius
> convened without favorable auspices in violation of: The Decretum collegii
> pontificum et augurum de iure auspicandi et tripudio and Report of this
> Session issued by Tribunus Dexter.
> The Senate session is vetoed, the consul Albucius convened the session
> without favorable auspices in violation of:
> The Decretum collegii pontificum et augurum de iure auspicandi et tripudio
> which can be found here:
>
> http://www.novaroma.org/nr/Decretum_collegii_pontificum_et_augurum_de_iure_auspicandi_et_tripudio_
> (Nova_Roma)
> This decretum specifies ius auspicandi for magistrates along with
> limitations to the ius auspicandi. Assuming that Consul Albucius is a
> "practitioner" of the religio romana as defined by the decretum the
> following clause applies, "A curule magistrate who is a practitioner of the
> Religio Romana, but not an augur, pontifex, flamen, sacerdos, or pullarius,
> shall submit a written report of any auspication he has taken and his
> interpretation thereof to the Collegium Augurum for verification that vitium
> has not occurred in the auspication." His ius auspicandi is limited and the
> following clause places final authority regarding auspices upon the
> Collegium Augurum, "In the event that the curule magistrate shall dispute
> interpretation of the auspication, the curule magistrate may appeal to the
> Collegium Augurum for ultimate interpretation of the auspication."
> The Collegium Augurum removed the ius auspicandi he once had:
> PARS III
> DECRETUM AUGURUM DE TRIPUDIO INRITO
> , states, "Consul P. Memmius Albucius, having violated augural law, is
> hereby disallowed from taking any further auspicia on public matters until
> the Collegium Augurum determines that his procedures conform to the
> requirements set by that body." Then we need to revisit Decretum collegii
> pontificum et augurum de iure auspciandi et tripudio which states, "It shall
> constitute an offence of impietas prudens dolo malo for a curule magistrate
> to knowingly convene a meeting of the Comitia Centuriata, Comitia Populi
> Tributa, or the Senate without performance of a valid auspication."
>
> This is why the Collegium Pontificum recently voted to declare Consul
> Albucius guilty of impietas prudens dolo malo.
>
> PARS III
>
> It is the determination of the Collegium Augurum that Consul P. Memmius
> Albucius
> has not and does not perform tripudia in a proper and accepted manner. He
> was
> not granted any privilege of auspicium by the Comitia Curiata, and indeed
> there
> is no provision in Nova Roma law for any magistrate to hold auspicium. Only
> where a magistrate is himself an augur publicus, or where he is under the
> direct
> supervision of an augur publicus, may a magistrate take his own auspicia.
> Never
> may one magistrate take auspices instead for another magistrate unless he
> is
> himself an augur publicus and acting in that capacity. Consul P. Memmius
> Albucius, having violated augural law, is hereby disallowed from taking any
> further auspicia on public matters until the Collegium Augurum determines
> that
> his procedures conform to the requirements set by that body.
> --
>
> Valete bene,
>
> CORVVS
>
>
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79483 From: Cato Date: 2010-08-21
Subject: Re: Intercessio
Cato M. Octavio omnibusque in foro SPD

The tribune cannot exercise an intercessio against something which occurred more than 72 hours (3 days) ago:

"A tribunus plebis may use intercessio by making an official announcement to at least one of Nova Roma's main communications fora (as defined by the Constitution) within 72 hours of the announcement of the item or action to be vetoed." (lex Labiena de intercessione ii)

The Consul called the Senate on July 22, and the Senate session was opened on July 26.

Valete,

Cato
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79484 From: Gaius Petronius Dexter Date: 2010-08-21
Subject: And the farce continues...
Ave colleague Corve,

> You are completely right. My intecessio considers the results of that
> session and report of it.

It is too late. The session ended on August 1st.
The no-taking of the auspicia is the fault of the augurs, who did not did their job, it is not the fault of the consul.

On the other hand, a report is a report and cannot be vetoed.
You can veto an edict or a decree but not a report.
Veto is not censure.

To do a veto you must quote the law or the passage of the Constitution being violated by the writing and sending of this report.

Optime vale.

C. Petronius Dexter
Tribunus Plebis Arcoiali scribebat
a. d. XII Kalendas Septembres P. Memmio K. Fabio II coss.


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79485 From: rory12001 Date: 2010-08-21
Subject: Re: Intercessio
Salvete;

there was no 'official meeting' of the Senate.

1. as there was no legal quorum under the Maine Non Profit statute

2. No favorable auspices were taken.

vale
Maior


--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Cato" <catoinnyc@...> wrote:
>
> Cato M. Octavio omnibusque in foro SPD
>
> The tribune cannot exercise an intercessio against something which occurred more than 72 hours (3 days) ago:
>
> "A tribunus plebis may use intercessio by making an official announcement to at least one of Nova Roma's main communications fora (as defined by the Constitution) within 72 hours of the announcement of the item or action to be vetoed." (lex Labiena de intercessione ii)
>
> The Consul called the Senate on July 22, and the Senate session was opened on July 26.
>
> Valete,
>
> Cato
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79486 From: petronius_dexter Date: 2010-08-21
Subject: Re: farce
C. Petronius Maiori s.p.d,

> there was no 'official meeting' of the Senate.

> 1. as there was no legal quorum under the Maine Non Profit statute
> 2. No favorable auspices were taken.

I like your logic, Maior.

The first point you pointed out is under the law of the Maine but not according to the rules of the Senate, the second is not under the laws of the Maine but according to the NR rules... what a mush/puree in your mind!

So, according to you, in current Maine non Profit meetings do we have to take favorable auspices?

Optime vale.

C. Petronius Dexter
Arcoiali scribebat
a. d. XII Kalendas Septembres P. Memmio K. Fabio II coss.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79487 From: Gaius Petronius Dexter Date: 2010-08-21
Subject: The farce continues.
C. Petronius M. Octavio s.p.d.,

> as I pointed out my veto is about session results. Yor report - action, and as such can be votoed.

Not at all.
Here we are in democracy not in Sarmatia and a report is not a decree. You cannot veto a report and to do a thing like that you must prove this report is violating law or Constitution, while it is an obligation and a tribune duty to make informed citizens.


Optime vale.

C. Petronius Dexter
Tribunus Plebis Arcoiali scribebat
a. d. XII Kalendas Septembres P. Memmio K. Fabio II coss.



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79488 From: Gaius Petronius Dexter Date: 2010-08-21
Subject: The big farce.
C. Petronius omnibus quiritibus s.p.d.,

What is a tribune intercessio? It is a veto by which an act of a magistrate is empeached, if this act is unfair and against the constitution and the laws. The laws could be violated if none tribune makes report, for example. But a report is on the duty of the tribunes. Making citizens informed is a duty of the tribunes. The tribune act of reporting cannot be vetoed, it is constitutional and allowed by laws.

Why this veto is a farce. If this report is vetoed. What is vetoed? The fact to report or the content of the report? If the fact to report is vetoed, so it is unconstitutional. But Corvus as other tribunes made reports. The fact to report a senate session is not unconstitutional, it is stated on laws. So a tribune cannot veto that or if he do that he must say the exact motive of his veto.

The only motive of this veto is a decretum de iure auspicandi.
Corvus said:
"The Decretum collegii pontificum et augurum de iure auspicandi et tripudio which can be found here:
http://www.novaroma.org/nr/Decretum_collegii_pontificum_et_augurum_de_iure_auspicandi_et_tripudio_(Nova_Roma)
This decretum specifies ius auspicandi for magistrates along with limitations to the ius auspicandi."

So, this report is vetoed because of the decretum de iure auspicandi?

It is a nonsense.

A tribune reporting did not need auspices.

The content is vetoed? So, in this case the veto must clearly say that.

Optime vale.

--
C. Petronius Dexter
Tribunus Plebis Arcoiali scribebat
a.d. XIII Kal. Sept. P. Memmio K. Fabio II coss.


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79489 From: Gaius Petronius Dexter Date: 2010-08-21
Subject: Re: Counter Intercessio by C. Petronius Dexter.
C. Petronius Dexter omnibus Quiritibus,

Ex officio C. Petronii Dextri tribuni Plebis,

As Constitution statues on the article 7,1:
"1. Each Tribune may issue only one such declaration of support or
disagreement, but may change their declaration from one to the other, should
they wish to do so."

I issue a counter intercessio against the M. Octavius Corvus intercessio,
because his intercessio is not valable.

The Senate session was ended on August 1st and more than 72 hours are
passed. So, this intercessio violates the lex Labiena de intercessione:
"A tribunus plebis may use intercessio by making an official announcement to
at least one of Nova Roma's main communications fora (as defined by the
Constitution) within 72 hours of the announcement of the item or action to
be vetoed."

Secondly:

M. Octavius Corvus' motive of intercessio is:
> The Decretum collegii pontificum et augurum de iure auspicandi et tripudio
> and Report of this Session issued by Tribunus Dexter.

But a tribune report does not need auspices to be made and sent.
This decretum de iure auspicandi did not concern tribunes reports anyway...

So this intercessio being a big farce, I counter it to grant to Nova Roma
the few honor which rests in her...

Optime valete.

C. Petronius Dexter
tribunus Plebis Arcoiali scribebat
a. d. XII Kalendas Septembres P. Memmio K. Fabio II coss.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79490 From: Riku Demyx Date: 2010-08-21
Subject: Re: Intercessio
Salve,
Oh Gods are we still fighting about the meeting. I understand it was wrong but
we have determined that and now we can do this thing called moving on. I swear I
babysit six year olds that can move on faster then we can.
DVIC
Nero.
P.S. I know people will turn around and say that it was necessary and blah but
the mere fact that I'm writing it before you say it shows how predictable we
have become.



________________________________
From: Cato <catoinnyc@...>
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Fri, August 20, 2010 11:19:34 PM
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Intercessio


Cato M. Octavio omnibusque in foro SPD

The tribune cannot exercise an intercessio against something which occurred more
than 72 hours (3 days) ago:

"A tribunus plebis may use intercessio by making an official announcement to at
least one of Nova Roma's main communications fora (as defined by the
Constitution) within 72 hours of the announcement of the item or action to be
vetoed." (lex Labiena de intercessione ii)

The Consul called the Senate on July 22, and the Senate session was opened on
July 26.

Valete,

Cato







[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79491 From: QFabiusMaxmi@aol.com Date: 2010-08-21
Subject: Re: Intercessio
Just what the hell are you vetoing here, Corvus?


Doesn't anyone understand how our system works?

You cannot veto an act 72 hours after the fact. You cannot veto a
report presented to the people, because, its a report. It is not an
action, or lex.

Gods our magistrates need to go to school.

And the Presidents of NR INC do not need favorable Auspicua to summon
its BoD. It's a corporation. ME law has little truck with the Gods of
Rome.

Q. Fabius Maximus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79492 From: Publius Memmius Albucius Date: 2010-08-21
Subject: Re: [CPT] Intercessio
Salve Tribune,



I do respect the tribunican toga for having been myself, before you, a Tribune of our Plebs.



For these reasons, I ask you *please* to reconsider your declarations below that will have no other consequence but risking to lower and maybe destroy your dignitas and auctoritas in our citizens' mind, for bringing them to think that you do not handle our laws or do not really wish to, for politician reasons.



With and because the whole respect I have for my former white tribunician toga, I am afraid that the seriousness of the tribunate be really at stake here. Now we have three left Tribunes, and we cannot afford that the Plebeian institution be contested by such unuseful positions who are both inconstitutional and do not bring nothing towards the coming challenges for NR: to fix both its legal frame, having its Roman Laws in conformity with the Incorporation ones ; to get a simple and efficient electoral tool and honest people to make it work ; to have new appointing officers to watch on our Finances.



Please consult former respected Tribunes, if you are reluctant listening to me or hearing your colleagues Aquillius Rota or Petronius Dexter.



I stay at your disposal for any information on our laws.





Vale Tribune,







P. Memmius Albucius cos.






To: ComitiaPlebisTributa@yahoogroups.com
From: corvvs@...
Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2010 23:14:35 -0600
Subject: Re: [CPT] Intercessio






Salve Valeriane,

You are completely right. My intecessio considers the results of that
session and report of it.

Vale,

CORVVS

On Sat, 21 Aug 2010 01:06:47 -0400, Gaius Tullius Valerianus
<gaius.tullius.valerianus@...> wrote:
> Salve Corve,
>
> Perhaps I am missing something, but I don't think you can forbid
him
> to
> do something that he has already done. The session already happened, you
> can't now forbid it to proceed. On the other hand, the implementation of
> the
> *results *of the session (e.g. the appointment of the new *praetores
*could
> be vetoed, and actually already has been by consul Quintilianus.
> I hope you do not take offense at my words, Corve, but I don't
think
> you can do what you are trying to do!
>
> Vale,
> ~ Valerianus
>
> On Sat, Aug 21, 2010 at 1:00 AM, mcorvvs <corvvs@...> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> Ex officio M. Octavi tribuni plebis,
>>
>> I issue intercessio on the July\August Senate session that consul
>> Albucius
>> convened without favorable auspices in violation of: The Decretum
>> collegii
>> pontificum et augurum de iure auspicandi et tripudio and Report of this
>> Session issued by Tribunus Dexter.
>> The Senate session is vetoed, the consul Albucius convened the session
>> without favorable auspices in violation of:
>> The Decretum collegii pontificum et augurum de iure auspicandi et
>> tripudio
>> which can be found here:
>>
>>
http://www.novaroma.org/nr/Decretum_collegii_pontificum_et_augurum_de_iure_auspicandi_et_tripudio_
>> (Nova_Roma)
>> This decretum specifies ius auspicandi for magistrates along with
>> limitations to the ius auspicandi. Assuming that Consul Albucius is a
>> "practitioner" of the religio romana as defined by the decretum the
>> following clause applies, "A curule magistrate who is a practitioner of
>> the
>> Religio Romana, but not an augur, pontifex, flamen, sacerdos, or
>> pullarius,
>> shall submit a written report of any auspication he has taken and his
>> interpretation thereof to the Collegium Augurum for verification that
>> vitium
>> has not occurred in the auspication." His ius auspicandi is limited and
>> the
>> following clause places final authority regarding auspices upon the
>> Collegium Augurum, "In the event that the curule magistrate shall
dispute
>> interpretation of the auspication, the curule magistrate may appeal to
>> the
>> Collegium Augurum for ultimate interpretation of the auspication."
>> The Collegium Augurum removed the ius auspicandi he once had:
>> PARS III
>> DECRETUM AUGURUM DE TRIPUDIO INRITO
>> , states, "Consul P. Memmius Albucius, having violated augural law, is
>> hereby disallowed from taking any further auspicia on public matters
>> until
>> the Collegium Augurum determines that his procedures conform to the
>> requirements set by that body." Then we need to revisit Decretum
collegii
>> pontificum et augurum de iure auspciandi et tripudio which states, "It
>> shall
>> constitute an offence of impietas prudens dolo malo for a curule
>> magistrate
>> to knowingly convene a meeting of the Comitia Centuriata, Comitia
Populi
>> Tributa, or the Senate without performance of a valid auspication."
>>
>> This is why the Collegium Pontificum recently voted to declare Consul
>> Albucius guilty of impietas prudens dolo malo.
>>
>> PARS III
>>
>> It is the determination of the Collegium Augurum that Consul P. Memmius
>> Albucius
>> has not and does not perform tripudia in a proper and accepted manner.
He
>> was
>> not granted any privilege of auspicium by the Comitia Curiata, and
indeed
>> there
>> is no provision in Nova Roma law for any magistrate to hold auspicium.
>> Only
>> where a magistrate is himself an augur publicus, or where he is under
the
>> direct
>> supervision of an augur publicus, may a magistrate take his own
auspicia.
>> Never
>> may one magistrate take auspices instead for another magistrate unless
he
>> is
>> himself an augur publicus and acting in that capacity. Consul P.
Memmius
>> Albucius, having violated augural law, is hereby disallowed from taking
>> any
>> further auspicia on public matters until the Collegium Augurum
determines
>> that
>> his procedures conform to the requirements set by that body.
>> --
>>
>> Valete bene,
>>
>> CORVVS
>>
>>
>>





[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79493 From: marcushoratius Date: 2010-08-21
Subject: a. d. XII Kalendas Septembris: CONSUALIA
M. Moravius Piscinus Pontifex Maximus Quiritibus, cultoribus Deorum et omnibus salutem plurimam dicit: Deus Bonus Consus vos porrigat.

Hodie est ante diem XII Kalendas Septembres; haec dies nefastus piaculum est: CONSUALIA: Conso in Aventino sacrificium

AUC 481 / 272 BCE: Dedication of the Temple of Consus on the Aventine

CONSUALIA

"The Consualia was so named from Consus, because then there was a state festival held for this God, and in the Circus Maximus at His altar those games were enacted by the priests in which the Sabine maidens were carried off." ~ M. Terrentius Varro, Lingua Latinae 6.20

One of the earliest festivals, instituted by Romulus, the Consualia took place at the Altar of Consus that laid in the valley between the Aventine and Palatine. In time this valley came to be used for horse races and when the Circus Maximus was built, the Altar lay near the primae metae of the southeastern end of the spina. The Altar was underground (Servius, Aeneis 8.636: templum sub tecto; Tertullian, Spect. 5 and 8: sub terra; Dion. 1.33: temenos). It was uncovered, and sacrifices made upon it, on 7 July, 21 August, and 15 December. On the Altar was an inscription: "Consus consilio, Mars duello, Lares coillo potentes." Elsewhere, in the fragments that remain of the Carmen Salii, Consus was likewise associated in some way with Mars. Varro explained His name as an epitaph for Janus meaning "The Good Creator." Around the Altar of Consus were placed images of the Italic agricultural goddesses Seia, Segestia, and Tutulina. Seia and Seius (or Semo) were Sabine deities of sowing (CIL 11.7866). Segesta is the goddess of grain as it stands in the fields. She is one of twelve indigitamenta invoked with Ceres by the flamen Cerealis (Servius, Georgic 121). Tutilina and Tutanus are deities of harvesting and storing grain. Like other agricultural deities Their names may never be said aloud while indoors (Pliny. H. N. 18.2). The procession held in honor of Consus led horses and mules who were decked in wreathes of flowers. The flamen Quirinalis and the Vestal Virgines then made the sacrifices to Consus along with Seia, Segesta, and Tutalina, which included offerings of wreathes with many flowers. Consus was a God of horses, which accounts for the rest granted these animals during His festivals, as well as the horse races held in His honor.


Garlands on Horses at Consualia

"Why is it that at festival of the Consualia they place garlands on both the horses and the asses and allow them to rest?
Is it because they celebrate this festival in honour of Poseidon, god of horses, and the ass enjoys a share in the horse's exemption?
Or is it that since navigation and transport by sea have been discovered, pack animals have come to enjoy a certain measure of ease and rest? " ~ Plutarch, Roman Questions 48

"(They) instituted the festival called by the Arcadians Hippocrateia and by the Romans Consualia, during which it is customary among the latter for the horses and mules to rest from work and to have their heads crowned with flowers. They also consecrated many other precincts, altars and images of the Gods and instituted purifications and sacrifices according to the customs of their own country, which continued to be performed down to my day in the same manner." ~ Dionysius of Halicarnassus 1.33


The First Consualia: Rape of the Sabine Women

The Roman State had now become so strong that it was a match for any of its neighbours in war, but its greatness threatened to last for only one generation, since through the absence of women there was no hope of offspring, and there was no right of intermarriage with their neighbours. Acting on the advice of the senate, Romulus sent envoys amongst the surrounding nations to ask for alliance and the right of intermarriage on behalf of his new community. It was represented that cities, like everything else, sprung from the humblest beginnings, and those who were helped on by their own courage and the favour of heaven won for themselves great power and great renown. As to the origin of Rome, it was well known that whilst it had received divine assistance, courage and self-reliance were not wanting. There should, therefore, be no reluctance for men to mingle their blood with their fellow-men. Nowhere did the envoys meet with a favourable reception. Whilst their proposals were treated with contumely, there was at the same time a general feeling of alarm at the power so rapidly growing in their midst. Usually they were dismissed with the question, 'whether they had opened an asylum for women, for nothing short of that would secure for them intermarriage on equal terms.' The Roman youth could ill brook such insults, and matters began to look like an appeal to force. To secure a favourable place and time for such an attempt, Romulus, disguising his resentment, made elaborate preparations for the celebration of games in honour of 'Equestrian Neptune,' which he called 'the Consualia.' He ordered public notice of the spectacle to be given amongst the adjoining cities, and his people supported him in making the celebration as magnificent as their knowledge and resources allowed, so that expectations were raised to the highest pitch. There was a great gathering; people were eager to see the new City, all their nearest neighbours-the people of Caenina, Antemnae, and Crustumerium-were there, and the whole Sabine population came, with their wives and families. They were invited to accept hospitality at the different houses, and after examining the situation of the City, its walls and the large number of dwelling-houses it included, they were astonished at the rapidity with which the Roman State had grown.

"When the hour for the games had come, and their eyes and minds were alike riveted on the spectacle before them, the preconcerted signal was given and the Roman youth dashed in all directions to carry off the maidens who were present. The larger part were carried off indiscriminately, but some particularly beautiful girls who had been marked out for the leading patricians were carried to their houses by plebeians told off for the task. One, conspicuous amongst them all for grace and beauty, is reported to have been carried off by a group led by a certain Talassius, and to the many inquiries as to whom she was intended for, the invariable answer was given, "For Talassius." Hence the use of this word in the marriage rites. Alarm and consternation broke up the games, and the parents of the maidens fled, distracted with grief, uttering bitter reproaches on the violators of the laws of hospitality and appealing to the god to whose solemn games they had come, only to be the victims of impious perfidy. The abducted maidens were quite as despondent and indignant. Romulus, however, went round in person, and pointed out to them that it was all owing to the pride of their parents in denying right of intermarriage to their neighbours. They would live in honourable wedlock, and share all their property and civil rights, and- dearest of all to human nature-would be the mothers of freemen. He begged them to lay aside their feelings of resentment and give their affections to those whom fortune had made masters of their persons. An injury had often led to reconciliation and love; they would find their husbands all the more affectionate, because each would do his utmost, so far as in him lay, to make up for the loss of parents and country. These arguments were reinforced by the endearments of their husbands, who excused their conduct by pleading the irresistible force of their passion-a plea effective beyond all others in appealing to a woman's nature." ~ Titus Livius 1.9

Another account of this first Consualia

"Inasmuch as many nations that were both numerous and brave in war dwelt round about Rome and none of them was friendly to the Romans, he desired to conciliate them by intermarriages, which, in the opinion of the ancients, was the surest method of cementing friendships; but considering that the cities in question would not of their own accord unite with the Romans, who were just getting settled together in one city, and who neither were powerful by reason of their wealth nor had performed any brilliant exploit, but that they would yield to force if no insolence accompanied such compulsion, he determined, with the approval of Numitor, his grandfather, to bring about the desired intermarriages by a wholesale seizure of virgins. After he had taken this resolution, he first made a vow to the God who presides over secret counsels to celebrate sacrifices and festivals every year if his enterprise should succeed. Then, having laid his plan before the senate and gaining their approval, he announced that he would hold a festival and general assemblage in honor of Neptune, and he sent word roundabout to the nearest cities, inviting all who wished to do so to be present at the assemblage and to take part in the increases; for he was going to hold contests of all sorts, both between horses and between men. And when many strangers came with their wives and children to the festival, he first offered the sacrifices to Neptune and held the contests: then, on the last day, on which he was to dismiss the assemblage, he ordered the young men, when he himself should raise the signal, to seize all the virgins who had come to the spectacle, each group taking those they should first encounter, to keep them that night without violating their chastity and bring them to him the next day. So the young men divided themselves into several groups, and as soon as they saw the signal raised, fell to seizing the virgins; and straightway the strangers were in an uproar and fled, suspecting some greater mischief. The next day, when the virgins were brought before Romulus, he comforted them in their despair with the assurance that they had been seized, not out of wantonness, but for the purpose of marriage; for he pointed out that this was an ancient Greek custom and that of all methods of contracting marriages for women it was the most illustrious, and he asked them to cherish those whom Fortune had given them for their husbands. Then counting them and finding their number to be six hundred and eighty-three, he chose an equal number of unmarried men to whom he united them according to the customs of each woman's country, basing the marriages on a communion of fire and water, in the same manner as marriages are performed even down to our times.

"Some state that these things happened in the first year of Romulus' reign, but Gnaeus Gellius says it was in the fourth, which is more probable. For it is not likely that the head of a newly-built city would undertake such an enterprise before establishing its government. As regards the reason for the seizing of the virgins, some ascribe it to a scarcity of women, others to the seeking of pretext for war; but those who give the most plausible account — and with them I agree — attribute it to the design of contracting an alliance with the neighboring cities, founded on affinity. And the Romans even to my day continued to celebrate the festival then instituted by Romulus, calling it the Consualia, in the course of which a subterranean altar, erected near the Circus Maximus, is uncovered by the removal of the soil round about it and honored with sacrifices and burnt-offerings of first-fruits and a course is run both by horses yoked to chariots and by single horses. The God to whom these honors are paid is called Consus by the Romans, being the same, according to some who render the name into our tongue, as Poseidon Seisichthon or the "Earth-shaker"; and they say that this God was honored with a subterranean altar because He holds the earth. I know also from hearsay another tradition, to the effect that the festival is indeed celebrated in honor of Neptune and the horse-races are held in His honor, but that the subterranean altar was erected later to a certain divinity whose name may not be uttered, who presides over and is the guardian of hidden counsels; for a secret altar has never been erected to Neptune, they say, in any part of the world by either Greeks or barbarians. But it is hard to say what the truth of the matter is." ~ Dionysius of Halicarnassus 2.30-31

Plutarch, Roman Questions 85:

"Why in the early days did they not allow their wives to grind grain or to cook? Was it in memory of the treaty which they made with the Sabines? For when they had carried off the Sabines' daughters, and later, after warring with the Sabines, had made peace, it was specified among the other articles of agreement that no Sabine woman should grind grain for a Roman or cook for him."


Our thought for today is from Epictetus, Echeiridion 50:

"Whatever rules you have adopted, abide by them as laws, and as if you would be impious to transgress them; and do not regard what anyone says of you, for this, after all, is no concern of yours."



Visit Religio_Romana_Cultorum_Deorum-subscribe@yahoogroups.com
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79494 From: marcushoratius Date: 2010-08-21
Subject: Report of the August session of the Collegium Pontificum
Ex Domo Pontifici Maximi:

M. Moravius Piscinus Horatianus Pontifex Maximus: P. Memmio Albucio, K. Fabio Buteone Quintiliano Consulibus, Tribunibus Plebis, Senatoribus Senatricibusque, Patribus Mátribusque Conscriptís, Civibus Novae Romae, Quiritibus: salutem plurimam dicit:

The Collegium Pontificum having met Die pristini Eidus Sextiliae (Thurs. 12 July) and concluding its discussion on a. d. XIII Kalendas Septembres issues the following:

Ego dico edico cum Divis volentibus ut Collegium Pontificum hoc decretum protulit:

QUOD BONUM FAUSTVM FORTUNATUMQVE SIT POPULO NOVO ROMANO QUIRITIBUS:

ITEM I: Decretum diebus fastis A. U. C. MMDCCLXIV

"The Collegium Pontificum approves of the revised Calendar for AUC MMDCCLXIV as
recommended by Pontifex maximus M. Moravius and Flamen C. Petronius."



QUOD BONUM FAUSTVM FORTUNATUMQVE SIT POPULO NOVO ROMANO QUIRITIBUS:

ITEM II: Decretum de Consule P. Memmio impietate prudente dolo malo.

"The Collegium Pontificum, upon the request of the Collegium Augurum, has determined that Consul P. Memmius Albucius had violated previous instructions by the Augures Publicii, as laid out in the Decretum augurum de tripudio inrito, and thereby he has knowingly violated the Decretum collegii pontificum et augurum de iure auspicandi et tripudio in regard to the provisions of De Impietate et Auspicando.

"Therefore, the Collegium Pontificum has determined that Consul P. Memmius Albucius, in ignoring the augures publici and their collegium, knowingly proceeded with the conduct of elections in the comitia centuriata without valid auspices, on a date not approved by the Gods, and without selection of a centuria praerogativa as required by law. It is therefore the determination of the Collegium Pontificum that, under the Decretum collegii pontificum et augurum de iure auspicandi et tripudio, Consul P. Memmius Albucius has indeed committed
an offence of impietas prudens dolo malo in violation of the Constitution and Decreta Collegii Pontificum et Augurum by knowingly convening an assembly of the Comitia Centuriata and the Senate without performance of a valid auspication."



QUOD BONUM FAUSTVM FORTUNATUMQVE SIT POPULO NOVO ROMANO QUIRITIBUS:

ITEM III: Decretum Pontificum de M. Hortensia Flamenica Carmentis

"Having completed her instruction as previously given by the Collegium Pontificum, the voting privileges of Flamenica M. Hortensia in the Collegium Pontificum are restored."


Di immortales faciant, tam felix quam pia.

Datum sub manu mea a. d. XII Kal. Sept. P. Memmio K. Fabio ccs in anno a. .u .c. MMDCCLXIII
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79495 From: Diana Octavia Date: 2010-08-21
Subject: Re: Women in Nova Roma
Salvete all,

When I ran for Consul in 2004 (or was it 2005?), I was suddenly bombarded
with people saying that I acted like a slut at Roman days in 2003. The day
that everyone saw me, I was sitting in Paulinus's tent crying for half the
day. This was truly an amazing statement since my father had recently died.
So there I was, dead tired from mulitple trans-Atlantic flights, weeks of
sitting in a hospital and supporting my hysterical mother. I was not feeling
'frisky' at all. And yet, once I was running for Consul-- the first woman to
do it-- some of the very same people who sang my praises immediately after
Roman Days, were now saying that I acted like a slut there. Truly amazing.

There is no one in Nova Roma that can claim that they have ever seen me
acting like a slut or picking up men or anything else even remotely related
to that. Plus I was the Priestess of Venus and so an easy target to be
called a 'meretrix'. I felt that the comments about me were also a slur
against Rome's patron Goddess, but of course that's my opinion. I do enjoy
making jokes about sex, and enjoy flirting, and I have openly stated more
than once that I believe that 'anything goes' regarding sex between people
of consenting age as long as all parties are in agreement. I am a
heterosexual, but I couldn't care less if someone is gay or straight because
no one should be told who they can and cannot love. But what should one
expect from a Priestess of Venus? And don't many people feel the same way?

That creep Saturninus who was friendly to my face in Belgium and who dumped
*all* of the organization of the first European NR meeting in Belgium, also
jumped in and knifed me in the back for no reason at all. Luckily many stood
up for me who were present at Roman Days or the NR meeting in Belgium.

These were definitely attacks based on gender. If a man regularly jumps into
bed with many women, he is considered a stud and 'virile'. But if a woman
has a strong character and also speaks openly about sex and never jumps into
bed with various men, then she is a slut. Something is still wrong in this
world.

Valete,
Diana Octavia
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79496 From: James Hooper Date: 2010-08-21
Subject: Re: Women in Nova Roma
Salve Octavia,

Well said. This is been the problem in all cultures from Greece and Rome to
the present. Women in government is a fact not a fancy. Are we to revert to
the mentality of the Taliban, and push women back into subservient roles, deny
them education and cultural equality? As for me, NEVER. Why hasnt' there ever
been a female consul? The time has come, just as this United States will have
a female president in the very near future.

Vale,
C. Pompeius Marcellus


On Sat, 21 Aug 2010 14:20:20 +0200
"Diana Octavia" <roman.babe@...> wrote:
> Salvete all,
>
> When I ran for Consul in 2004 (or was it 2005?), I was suddenly bombarded
> with people saying that I acted like a slut at Roman days in 2003. The day
> that everyone saw me, I was sitting in Paulinus's tent crying for half the
> day. This was truly an amazing statement since my father had recently died.
> So there I was, dead tired from mulitple trans-Atlantic flights, weeks of
> sitting in a hospital and supporting my hysterical mother. I was not feeling
> 'frisky' at all. And yet, once I was running for Consul-- the first woman to
> do it-- some of the very same people who sang my praises immediately after
> Roman Days, were now saying that I acted like a slut there. Truly amazing.
>
> There is no one in Nova Roma that can claim that they have ever seen me
> acting like a slut or picking up men or anything else even remotely related
> to that. Plus I was the Priestess of Venus and so an easy target to be
> called a 'meretrix'. I felt that the comments about me were also a slur
> against Rome's patron Goddess, but of course that's my opinion. I do enjoy
> making jokes about sex, and enjoy flirting, and I have openly stated more
> than once that I believe that 'anything goes' regarding sex between people
> of consenting age as long as all parties are in agreement. I am a
> heterosexual, but I couldn't care less if someone is gay or straight because
> no one should be told who they can and cannot love. But what should one
> expect from a Priestess of Venus? And don't many people feel the same way?
>
> That creep Saturninus who was friendly to my face in Belgium and who dumped
> *all* of the organization of the first European NR meeting in Belgium, also
> jumped in and knifed me in the back for no reason at all. Luckily many stood
> up for me who were present at Roman Days or the NR meeting in Belgium.
>
> These were definitely attacks based on gender. If a man regularly jumps into
> bed with many women, he is considered a stud and 'virile'. But if a woman
> has a strong character and also speaks openly about sex and never jumps into
> bed with various men, then she is a slut. Something is still wrong in this
> world.
>
> Valete,
> Diana Octavia
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79497 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2010-08-21
Subject: Re: Women in Nova Roma
Actually there has been a female consul. Po has been. :)

On Sat, Aug 21, 2010 at 7:02 AM, James Hooper <warrior44_us@...>wrote:

>
>
> Salve Octavia,
>
> Well said. This is been the problem in all cultures from Greece and Rome to
>
> the present. Women in government is a fact not a fancy. Are we to revert to
>
> the mentality of the Taliban, and push women back into subservient roles,
> deny
> them education and cultural equality? As for me, NEVER. Why hasnt' there
> ever
> been a female consul? The time has come, just as this United States will
> have
> a female president in the very near future.
>
> Vale,
> C. Pompeius Marcellus
>
>
> On Sat, 21 Aug 2010 14:20:20 +0200
> "Diana Octavia" <roman.babe@... <roman.babe%40yahoo.com>> wrote:
> > Salvete all,
> >
> > When I ran for Consul in 2004 (or was it 2005?), I was suddenly bombarded
>
> > with people saying that I acted like a slut at Roman days in 2003. The
> day
> > that everyone saw me, I was sitting in Paulinus's tent crying for half
> the
> > day. This was truly an amazing statement since my father had recently
> died.
> > So there I was, dead tired from mulitple trans-Atlantic flights, weeks of
>
> > sitting in a hospital and supporting my hysterical mother. I was not
> feeling
> > 'frisky' at all. And yet, once I was running for Consul-- the first woman
> to
> > do it-- some of the very same people who sang my praises immediately
> after
> > Roman Days, were now saying that I acted like a slut there. Truly
> amazing.
> >
> > There is no one in Nova Roma that can claim that they have ever seen me
> > acting like a slut or picking up men or anything else even remotely
> related
> > to that. Plus I was the Priestess of Venus and so an easy target to be
> > called a 'meretrix'. I felt that the comments about me were also a slur
> > against Rome's patron Goddess, but of course that's my opinion. I do
> enjoy
> > making jokes about sex, and enjoy flirting, and I have openly stated more
>
> > than once that I believe that 'anything goes' regarding sex between
> people
> > of consenting age as long as all parties are in agreement. I am a
> > heterosexual, but I couldn't care less if someone is gay or straight
> because
> > no one should be told who they can and cannot love. But what should one
> > expect from a Priestess of Venus? And don't many people feel the same
> way?
> >
> > That creep Saturninus who was friendly to my face in Belgium and who
> dumped
> > *all* of the organization of the first European NR meeting in Belgium,
> also
> > jumped in and knifed me in the back for no reason at all. Luckily many
> stood
> > up for me who were present at Roman Days or the NR meeting in Belgium.
> >
> > These were definitely attacks based on gender. If a man regularly jumps
> into
> > bed with many women, he is considered a stud and 'virile'. But if a woman
>
> > has a strong character and also speaks openly about sex and never jumps
> into
> > bed with various men, then she is a slut. Something is still wrong in
> this
> > world.
> >
> > Valete,
> > Diana Octavia
> >
>
>
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79498 From: C.Maria Caeca Date: 2010-08-21
Subject: something I wrote
DEDICATION



I come to you, Great Vesta, as I am;

Pretending nothing: claim no merits

I do not possess: I bring you my virtues and

My faults: Knowing my unworthiness, yet

Knowing also that, within my heart, I can find

And have always found your bright, steady flame:



I do not know what my ancient sisters felt, or brought

Of themselves to lay before you: I only know

That what I have of love, and will, and purpose

I offer you, and can only hope that you, in your

Wisdom find them, and this, your servant, worthy.



C. Maria Caeca

8/20/2010
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79499 From: Cato Date: 2010-08-21
Subject: Re: Report of the August session of the Collegium Pontificum
Cato Piscino sal.

Shouldn't this read "ex Domo Publicae", since the official residenceof the Pontifex Maximus was the Domus Publica?

Vale,

Cato


--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "marcushoratius" <MHoratius@...> wrote:
>
> Ex Domo Pontifici Maximi:
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79500 From: Cato Date: 2010-08-21
Subject: Re: Report of the August session of the Collegium Pontificum
Cato Memmio Albucio consule sal.

All of which reminds me, have you had a chance to decide on the petitio actionis I have submitted to you regarding charges of laesa patriae and the one on charges of falsum, both against Piscinus?

Since your colleague vetoed the appointments of praetors, we have only the consulate to whom to address our grievances.

Vale,

Cato
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79501 From: Kirsteen Wright Date: 2010-08-21
Subject: Re: something I wrote
Absolutely beautiful.

Merula

On Sat, Aug 21, 2010 at 4:32 PM, C.Maria Caeca <c.mariacaeca@...>wrote:

> DEDICATION
>
>
>
> I come to you, Great Vesta, as I am;
>
> Pretending nothing: claim no merits
>
> I do not possess: I bring you my virtues and
>
> My faults: Knowing my unworthiness, yet
>
> Knowing also that, within my heart, I can find
>
> And have always found your bright, steady flame:
>
>
>
> I do not know what my ancient sisters felt, or brought
>
> Of themselves to lay before you: I only know
>
> That what I have of love, and will, and purpose
>
> I offer you, and can only hope that you, in your
>
> Wisdom find them, and this, your servant, worthy.
>
>
>
> C. Maria Caeca
>
> 8/20/2010
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79502 From: Cato Date: 2010-08-21
Subject: Re: Report of the August session of the Collegium Pontificum
Cato Piscino sal.

Are these *all* the items voted on in the College of Pontiffs' meeting?

Vale,

Cato


--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "marcushoratius" <MHoratius@...> wrote:
>
> Ex Domo Pontifici Maximi:
>
> M. Moravius Piscinus Horatianus Pontifex Maximus: P. Memmio Albucio, K. Fabio Buteone Quintiliano Consulibus, Tribunibus Plebis, Senatoribus Senatricibusque, Patribus Mátribusque Conscriptís, Civibus Novae Romae, Quiritibus: salutem plurimam dicit:
>
> The Collegium Pontificum having met Die pristini Eidus Sextiliae (Thurs. 12 July) and concluding its discussion on a. d. XIII Kalendas Septembres issues the following:
>
> Ego dico edico cum Divis volentibus ut Collegium Pontificum hoc decretum protulit:
>
> QUOD BONUM FAUSTVM FORTUNATUMQVE SIT POPULO NOVO ROMANO QUIRITIBUS:
>
> ITEM I: Decretum diebus fastis A. U. C. MMDCCLXIV
>
> "The Collegium Pontificum approves of the revised Calendar for AUC MMDCCLXIV as
> recommended by Pontifex maximus M. Moravius and Flamen C. Petronius."
>
>
>
> QUOD BONUM FAUSTVM FORTUNATUMQVE SIT POPULO NOVO ROMANO QUIRITIBUS:
>
> ITEM II: Decretum de Consule P. Memmio impietate prudente dolo malo.
>
> "The Collegium Pontificum, upon the request of the Collegium Augurum, has determined that Consul P. Memmius Albucius had violated previous instructions by the Augures Publicii, as laid out in the Decretum augurum de tripudio inrito, and thereby he has knowingly violated the Decretum collegii pontificum et augurum de iure auspicandi et tripudio in regard to the provisions of De Impietate et Auspicando.
>
> "Therefore, the Collegium Pontificum has determined that Consul P. Memmius Albucius, in ignoring the augures publici and their collegium, knowingly proceeded with the conduct of elections in the comitia centuriata without valid auspices, on a date not approved by the Gods, and without selection of a centuria praerogativa as required by law. It is therefore the determination of the Collegium Pontificum that, under the Decretum collegii pontificum et augurum de iure auspicandi et tripudio, Consul P. Memmius Albucius has indeed committed
> an offence of impietas prudens dolo malo in violation of the Constitution and Decreta Collegii Pontificum et Augurum by knowingly convening an assembly of the Comitia Centuriata and the Senate without performance of a valid auspication."
>
>
>
> QUOD BONUM FAUSTVM FORTUNATUMQVE SIT POPULO NOVO ROMANO QUIRITIBUS:
>
> ITEM III: Decretum Pontificum de M. Hortensia Flamenica Carmentis
>
> "Having completed her instruction as previously given by the Collegium Pontificum, the voting privileges of Flamenica M. Hortensia in the Collegium Pontificum are restored."
>
>
> Di immortales faciant, tam felix quam pia.
>
> Datum sub manu mea a. d. XII Kal. Sept. P. Memmio K. Fabio ccs in anno a. .u .c. MMDCCLXIII
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79503 From: petronius_dexter Date: 2010-08-22
Subject: Re: something I wrote
Salve Caeca!

Your Vesta dedication is certainly beautiful, my ears are not able to appreciate English verses and tenses, and I hope that your words have touched the heart of Vesta, the great civic goddess.

Thank you for the poems.

May I suggest to our Cn. Lentulus to put them on the web site in a Vesta temple wiki page, if he have time to do that?

Optime vale.

C. Petronius Dexter
Flamen Portunalis Arcoiali scribebat
a. d. XI Kalendas Septembres P. Memmio K. Fabio II coss.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79504 From: rory12001 Date: 2010-08-22
Subject: Re: Women in Nova Roma
M. Hortensia D. Octaviae peregrinae sd;
I've been friends with C. Curius Saturninus since I became a civis in 2003; I took a course "Intro to Nova Roma" that he taught with Gn. Salvius Astur; and my classmate was Cordus, another good friend. Sadly neither Astur or Cordus can stand NR anymore.

no one could ask for a better friend nor a more devoted Nova Roman than Saturninus.

Saturninus ran Academia Thules for many years giving free courses to all NR cives, he produced the Vox Romana podcast along with me and has been the webmaster & in charge of IT for years; donating his precious time and expertise. He produces a terrific Roman calender too.

He's a wonderful Roman and his deeds speak volumes about the kind of person he is.
M.Hortensia Maior

---
>
> That creep Saturninus who was friendly to my face in Belgium and who dumped
> *all* of the organization of the first European NR meeting in Belgium, also
> jumped in and knifed me in the back for no reason at all. Luckily many stood
> up for me who were present at Roman Days or the NR meeting in Belgium.
>
>
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79505 From: rory12001 Date: 2010-08-22
Subject: Re: Report of the August session of the Collegium Pontificum
Don't waste your time, the tribunes will veto any action in this matter;-)


--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Cato" <catoinnyc@...> wrote:
>
> Cato Memmio Albucio consule sal.
>
> All of which reminds me, have you had a chance to decide on the petitio actionis I have submitted to you regarding charges of laesa patriae and the one on charges of falsum, both against Piscinus?
>
> Since your colleague vetoed the appointments of praetors, we have only the consulate to whom to address our grievances.
>
> Vale,
>
> Cato
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79506 From: Cato Date: 2010-08-22
Subject: Re: Report of the August session of the Collegium Pontificum
Cato Maiori sal.

So you think it is better for a tribune to veto anything than have a grievance aired in an open Nova Roman court?

Besides which, you may have the wrong idea about our remaining tribunes; they may, in fact, be more interested in upholding the law than dancing to the disastrous tune played by Piscinus.

Vale,

Cato



--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "rory12001" <rory12001@...> wrote:
>
> Don't waste your time, the tribunes will veto any action in this matter;-)
>
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Cato" <catoinnyc@> wrote:
> >
> > Cato Memmio Albucio consule sal.
> >
> > All of which reminds me, have you had a chance to decide on the petitio actionis I have submitted to you regarding charges of laesa patriae and the one on charges of falsum, both against Piscinus?
> >
> > Since your colleague vetoed the appointments of praetors, we have only the consulate to whom to address our grievances.
> >
> > Vale,
> >
> > Cato
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79507 From: petronius_dexter Date: 2010-08-22
Subject: Re: Women in Nova Roma
C. Petronius mulieribus Novis Romanis s.p.d.,

One of the problems with M. Hortensia Maior is that her friends are always very devoted to NR, but never here in NR, they are always terrific in what they do, but they resign their citizenship, now Saturninus left NR with his "terrific" calendar under the arm...

I think that Maior is living in a world apart, I do not know exactly where, in which she completely deluded herself.

Optime valete.

C. Petronius Dexter
Arcoiali scribebat
a. d. XI Kalendas Septembres P. Memmio K. Fabio II coss.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79508 From: Cato Date: 2010-08-22
Subject: Re: Women in Nova Roma
Cato Petronio Dextero sal.

All the information contained in the calendar that Saturninus produced was collected and/or written by me; I have it all still, and if anyone wants to take on the project of re-creating it I will certainly help.

Vale,

Cato



--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "petronius_dexter" <jfarnoud94@...> wrote:
>
> C. Petronius mulieribus Novis Romanis s.p.d.,
>
> One of the problems with M. Hortensia Maior is that her friends are always very devoted to NR, but never here in NR, they are always terrific in what they do, but they resign their citizenship, now Saturninus left NR with his "terrific" calendar under the arm...
>
> I think that Maior is living in a world apart, I do not know exactly where, in which she completely deluded herself.
>
> Optime valete.
>
> C. Petronius Dexter
> Arcoiali scribebat
> a. d. XI Kalendas Septembres P. Memmio K. Fabio II coss.
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79509 From: Cato Date: 2010-08-22
Subject: lex de legibus discendis
Cato omnibus in foro SPD

I'd like to present here a suggestion I made quite a while ago; it may act as a useful tool not only for those who wish to become magistrates in the future but also current magistrates and, in fact, any Nova Roman who has read some of the speeches here and scratched their heads and said, "what?"

As we have seen in the recent past, many of our magistrates have had little or no understanding of our law. This might help:

"lex ________________ de Legibus Discendis

I. Any citizen seeking the office of tribune, praetor, or consul will be required to first complete successfully an 'Introduction to Nova Roman Law' class.

II. This class will be administered three times a year, beginning the Kalends of Februarius, Kalends of Iunius, and Kalends of Octobris, under the authority of one citizen appointed annually by the Senate and one citizen appointed annually by the tribunes of the plebs.

III. This course may also be taken at any time it is offered by any
citizen who is interested as often as they would like without restriction; once a citizen has successfully completed the course he or she does not need to take it again to run for any office in the future.

IV. The course may include quizzes and essay requirements, and will
culminate in a final exam that will be submitted to a blind panel of five chosen from among the senators and tribunes by lot. The results of the final exam will be posted in the forum within one week of the final exam being given.

V. This law shall take effect on the Kalends of Ianuarius ____."

Valete,

Cato
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79510 From: petronius_dexter Date: 2010-08-22
Subject: Re: Women in Nova Roma
C. Petronius C. Catoni s.p.d.,

> All the information contained in the calendar that Saturninus produced was collected and/or written by me; I have it all still, and if anyone wants to take on the project of re-creating it I will certainly help.

I am not affraid by this re-creating. As member of the Collegium Pontificum, I worked with M. Piscinus to establish the calendar of the year 2764. This calendar was voted by all the members of the CP in our last session and will become the official NR calendar.

Your knowledges about the Roman calendar certainly are used by Piscinus because he is a fan of the Saturninus calendar... I think that you have all your place for doing the best calendar to Nova Roma and I deplore the dichotomy of Nova Roma in two camps, because I am sure that we have citizens devoted to the best of Nova Roma within both camps.

Optime vale.

C. Petronius Dexter
Arcoiali scribebat
a. d. XI Kalendas Septembres P. Memmio K. Fabio II coss.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79511 From: GAIUS MARCIUS CRISPUS Date: 2010-08-22
Subject: Re: lex de legibus discendis
--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Cato" <catoinnyc@...> wrote:

> As we have seen in the recent past, many of our magistrates have had little or no understanding of our law.

Crispus Catoni omnibusque S.P.D.

Indeed yes. There is without any doubt among those who are set in authority over us a total lack of even the most basic knowledge of the law, and the procedures to be followed. The citizens, at least this one, are thoroughly fed up with the situation.

There is also a complete unwillingness by some to apply the right law, and to apply the law correctly. Or to allow anyone to take any action to try to solve the problems. Months have been wasted by constant bickering and obfuscation, when simple co-operation would by now have seen us well on the way to solving the problems and moving forward.

I for one would love to enrol myself for such a course, and I feel that this should be, as suggested, a qualification for office.

You would need to work round the idea for:-

"a final exam that will be submitted to a blind panel of five chosen from among the senators and tribunes by lot". How easily will we find 5 suitably qualified people by chance from amongst those, some of whom have been guilty of the most peculiar and unconstitutional actions.

I heartily support this suggestion, and sincerely hope it will be adopted.

And then of course we need to get the augurs to take auguries when asked, instead of refusing to take them and then complaining when others are forced to try to do something themselves because of their inaction or obstinacy.

Vale, et valete

Crispus
"Then none was for a party, then all were for the state".
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79512 From: petronius_dexter Date: 2010-08-22
Subject: Re: lex de legibus discendis
C. Petronius C. Catoni s.p.d.,

I agree with this effort to make citizens more familiar with the laws.

But, I also suggest to have the "handbook of the perfect laws writer". The NR laws all are bad written with words ambiguous which permitt all the interpretations you want and that shows us that before to learn laws we must learn to write them.

If laws are contradictory and some are like that, we must to modify that, etc.

Optime vale.

C. Petronius Dexter
Arcoiali scribebat
a. d. XI Kalendas Septembres P. Memmio K. Fabio II coss.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79513 From: Cato Date: 2010-08-22
Subject: Re: lex de legibus discendis
Cato Marco Crispo Petronio Dextero omnibusque in for SPD

The consularis Complutensis set up a committee to examine our laws last year; unfortunately, although several citizens were actively involved in it without further support from the government - and my being accused of treason(!) - it sort of just stalled.

It would be ideal to have it start up again under more favorable circumstances, with the specific goal of taking a close look at the tabularium and even a simple glossary of terms wherein we create the precise legal definitions of any terms that might be seen as unclear.

One thing to bear in mind is that as long as we do not contradict the basic laws under which we are incorporated, we can decide exactly what we want our law to mean, independent of any outside influence.

I know that the idea of working with our law is seen as useless to some and totally uninteresting to others, but perhaps interested citizens could simply gather together and work on it independently. With interested citizens it could very well serve as a learning experience for all of us.

Valete,

Cato





--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "petronius_dexter" <jfarnoud94@...> wrote:
>
> C. Petronius C. Catoni s.p.d.,
>
> I agree with this effort to make citizens more familiar with the laws.
>
> But, I also suggest to have the "handbook of the perfect laws writer". The NR laws all are bad written with words ambiguous which permitt all the interpretations you want and that shows us that before to learn laws we must learn to write them.
>
> If laws are contradictory and some are like that, we must to modify that, etc.
>
> Optime vale.
>
> C. Petronius Dexter
> Arcoiali scribebat
> a. d. XI Kalendas Septembres P. Memmio K. Fabio II coss.
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79514 From: marcushoratius Date: 2010-08-22
Subject: Re: And the farce continues...
M. Moravius Piscinus Quiritibus s. p. d.

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Gaius Petronius Dexter" <jfarnoud94@...> wrote:
>
> It is too late. The session ended on August 1st.
> The no-taking of the auspicia is the fault of the augurs, who did not did their job, it is not the fault of the consul.
>

False: The responsibility lies with the Consul to attain favorable auspices BEFORE calling the Senate to assemble. He did not. Issuing an announcement of calling the Senate on a sepcific date, and including in that announcement a request for auspices is not the same as awaiting the result of an auspicium. Further, the Augures informed him that the Senate was already in session at the time and that he would have to wait. He did not. The Augures Publici have never refused to take the auspices for Consul Albucius or for any magistrate, but Albucius seems to be the first magistrate who is so impatient, so full of himself, to follow procedures and await results that he finds inconvenient for his schedule. Well, the augures have their own procedures to follow in such matters.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79515 From: marcushoratius Date: 2010-08-22
Subject: Re: Report of the August session of the Collegium Pontificum
Salve Cato

Are you offering to buy me a house in Rome?

Vale

M. Moravius Pontifex Maximus



--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Cato" <catoinnyc@...> wrote:
>
> Cato Piscino sal.
>
> Shouldn't this read "ex Domo Publicae", since the official residenceof the Pontifex Maximus was the Domus Publica?
>
> Vale,
>
> Cato
>
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "marcushoratius" <MHoratius@> wrote:
> >
> > Ex Domo Pontifici Maximi:
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79516 From: marcushoratius Date: 2010-08-22
Subject: Re: Report of the August session of the Collegium Pontificum
Salvete Cato et Quirites

The Collegium Pontificum discusses many topics throughout the year. Only its determinations are reported, as has always been the case.

Valete

M. Moravius Pontifex Maximus



--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Cato" <catoinnyc@...> wrote:
>
> Cato Piscino sal.
>
> Are these *all* the items voted on in the College of Pontiffs' meeting?
>
> Vale,
>
> Cato
>
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "marcushoratius" <MHoratius@> wrote:
> >
> > Ex Domo Pontifici Maximi:
> >
> > M. Moravius Piscinus Horatianus Pontifex Maximus: P. Memmio Albucio, K. Fabio Buteone Quintiliano Consulibus, Tribunibus Plebis, Senatoribus Senatricibusque, Patribus Mátribusque Conscriptís, Civibus Novae Romae, Quiritibus: salutem plurimam dicit:
> >
> > The Collegium Pontificum having met Die pristini Eidus Sextiliae (Thurs. 12 July) and concluding its discussion on a. d. XIII Kalendas Septembres issues the following:
> >
> > Ego dico edico cum Divis volentibus ut Collegium Pontificum hoc decretum protulit:
> >
> > QUOD BONUM FAUSTVM FORTUNATUMQVE SIT POPULO NOVO ROMANO QUIRITIBUS:
> >
> > ITEM I: Decretum diebus fastis A. U. C. MMDCCLXIV
> >
> > "The Collegium Pontificum approves of the revised Calendar for AUC MMDCCLXIV as
> > recommended by Pontifex maximus M. Moravius and Flamen C. Petronius."
> >
> >
> >
> > QUOD BONUM FAUSTVM FORTUNATUMQVE SIT POPULO NOVO ROMANO QUIRITIBUS:
> >
> > ITEM II: Decretum de Consule P. Memmio impietate prudente dolo malo.
> >
> > "The Collegium Pontificum, upon the request of the Collegium Augurum, has determined that Consul P. Memmius Albucius had violated previous instructions by the Augures Publicii, as laid out in the Decretum augurum de tripudio inrito, and thereby he has knowingly violated the Decretum collegii pontificum et augurum de iure auspicandi et tripudio in regard to the provisions of De Impietate et Auspicando.
> >
> > "Therefore, the Collegium Pontificum has determined that Consul P. Memmius Albucius, in ignoring the augures publici and their collegium, knowingly proceeded with the conduct of elections in the comitia centuriata without valid auspices, on a date not approved by the Gods, and without selection of a centuria praerogativa as required by law. It is therefore the determination of the Collegium Pontificum that, under the Decretum collegii pontificum et augurum de iure auspicandi et tripudio, Consul P. Memmius Albucius has indeed committed
> > an offence of impietas prudens dolo malo in violation of the Constitution and Decreta Collegii Pontificum et Augurum by knowingly convening an assembly of the Comitia Centuriata and the Senate without performance of a valid auspication."
> >
> >
> >
> > QUOD BONUM FAUSTVM FORTUNATUMQVE SIT POPULO NOVO ROMANO QUIRITIBUS:
> >
> > ITEM III: Decretum Pontificum de M. Hortensia Flamenica Carmentis
> >
> > "Having completed her instruction as previously given by the Collegium Pontificum, the voting privileges of Flamenica M. Hortensia in the Collegium Pontificum are restored."
> >
> >
> > Di immortales faciant, tam felix quam pia.
> >
> > Datum sub manu mea a. d. XII Kal. Sept. P. Memmio K. Fabio ccs in anno a. .u .c. MMDCCLXIII
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79517 From: GAIUS MARCIUS CRISPUS Date: 2010-08-22
Subject: Re: lex de legibus discendis
--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Cato" <catoinnyc@...> wrote:

......perhaps interested citizens could simply gather together and work on it independently. With interested citizens it could very well serve as a learning experience for all of us.

Crispus Catoni, Dextero omnibusque SPD

It sounds as if a lot of sensible thinking has already taken place. Obviously it does not make sense just to go leaping in without proper planning, a well-considered strategy, a clear sense of direction, a systematic approach, and so on.

Please consider me an interested citizen. I am not a lawyer, but I have some detailed experience of working with lawyers and critically analizing text.

If I can help in any way, please do not hesitate to call on me.

Vale, et valete optime
Crispus
"Then none was for a party; then all were for the state".
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79518 From: petronius_dexter Date: 2010-08-22
Subject: Re: And the farce continues...
C. Petronius M. Moravio Quiritibusque s.p.d.,

> False: The responsibility lies with the Consul to attain favorable auspices BEFORE calling the Senate to assemble. He did not.

He did and you know that. He sent to you, as magister augurum, his agenda for a session. Begging too, if you cannot yourself take auspices, degelate to another augur.

Lying is not a good thing, mostly for an augur.

Optime vale.

C. Petronius Dexter
Tribunus Plebis Arcoiali scribebat
a. d. XI Kalendas Septembres P. Memmio K. Fabio II coss.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79519 From: marcushoratius Date: 2010-08-22
Subject: Re: lex de legibus discendis
Salve Cato

And when will you be enrolling in this class?

I still recall how you tried to argue that Scaevola had to be compelled to testify against himself, even though Nova Roma law strictly forbids it. Try reading the Leges Saliciae that you tried to prosecute Scaevola under.

Then there was the time you tried to argue that an aedilis holds tha same imperium as a consul and that as an aedilis you could assemble the Senate. That got you thrown out of the Senate.

As for your notorious argument on the use of "shall" in the Constitution, and your interpretations about many other aspects of Roman law and Nova Roma law, I am surprised that you have not included a requirement that Senators first take a class on our laws. But then if you had, you would have to be expelled as a very poor student on Nova Roma law.

So who do you suppose will teach this course? Perhaps our former consuls should as they know the law better than any since they wrote most of our laws or collaborated on them. So, Marinus, Modianus, Complutensis, Severus, Quintilianus, Apulus, oh, me, Piscinus, too, Sabinus, Popillius Laenas and six other consularii. So who do you think the Senate might appoint to teach such a course?

Vale

M. Moravius Piscinus

Senator Consularius
Pontifex Maximus
Magister Collegii Augurum


--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Cato" <catoinnyc@...> wrote:
>
> Cato omnibus in foro SPD
>
> I'd like to present here a suggestion I made quite a while ago; it may act as a useful tool not only for those who wish to become magistrates in the future but also current magistrates and, in fact, any Nova Roman who has read some of the speeches here and scratched their heads and said, "what?"
>
> As we have seen in the recent past, many of our magistrates have had little or no understanding of our law. This might help:
>
> "lex ________________ de Legibus Discendis
>
> I. Any citizen seeking the office of tribune, praetor, or consul will be required to first complete successfully an 'Introduction to Nova Roman Law' class.
>
> II. This class will be administered three times a year, beginning the Kalends of Februarius, Kalends of Iunius, and Kalends of Octobris, under the authority of one citizen appointed annually by the Senate and one citizen appointed annually by the tribunes of the plebs.
>
> III. This course may also be taken at any time it is offered by any
> citizen who is interested as often as they would like without restriction; once a citizen has successfully completed the course he or she does not need to take it again to run for any office in the future.
>
> IV. The course may include quizzes and essay requirements, and will
> culminate in a final exam that will be submitted to a blind panel of five chosen from among the senators and tribunes by lot. The results of the final exam will be posted in the forum within one week of the final exam being given.
>
> V. This law shall take effect on the Kalends of Ianuarius ____."
>
> Valete,
>
> Cato
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79520 From: petronius_dexter Date: 2010-08-22
Subject: Re: And the farce continues...
C. Petronius M. Moravio s.p.d.,

If the consul wanted to obtain from augures auspices and beg you to perform auspicia, you are not able to refuse his demand even if the Senate is yet in session.

Gods are able to give their response any time.

In refusing to take auspices, you made by yourself an obstruction, that is all.

Optime vale.

C. Petronius Dexter
Arcoiali scribebat
a. d. XI Kalendas Septembres P. Memmio K. Fabio II coss.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79521 From: petronius_dexter Date: 2010-08-22
Subject: Re: lex de legibus discendis
C. Petronius omnibus civibus s.p.d.,


> M. Moravius Piscinus
> Pontifex Maximus
> Magister Collegii Augurum

This cumulation on the same head is the crux of all the NR problems. The Ancients wiser never did that.

Optime vale.

C. Petronius Dexter
Arcoiali scribebat
a. d. XI Kalendas Septembres P. Memmio K. Fabio II coss.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79522 From: marcushoratius Date: 2010-08-22
Subject: Re: And the farce continues...
M. Moravius C. Petronio dicit:

You persist in your falsehoods. Augur Modianus told you inside the Collegium Pontificum, as I have told you as well, and as Augur Agricola shall confirm, Consul Albucius has not cooperated at all with the Collegium Augurum and the Augures have never refused to take auspices for him.

The fault lies with Consul Albucius, who is required under Senate rules to "attain" favorable auspices before holding a Senate session. Apparently you have a problem with English. "Requesting" does not mean "attaining." It does not matter really who was to take the auspices, as convening magistrate he must wait to receive favorable auspices. He proceeded without any auspices being taken. Albucius may have asked, in an announcement to the Senate, but that is not following the procedures of the Collegium Augurum. And if he had asked in a proper manner, then he would have to wait for a report from one of the augures. He was not to proceed without first receiving favorable auspices. When he didn't receive a report, he should have inquired further, but it was illegal under Senate rules and Decreta Pontifica et Augura to proceed with a Senate session without auspices.

Lying is not good for a Flamen to engage in, and accusing others of lying when you haven't the facts is a matter of slander. You are falsely accusing all of us Augurs of being liars and slandering the Collegium Augurum, as well as slandering the Collegium Pontificum that took up this matter and made its determination concerning Consul Albucius. You had your opportunity to make your arguments before the Collegium Pontificum and the Collegium did not agree with your position. So don't call the Collegia liars just because we do not see things from your biased perspective.


--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "petronius_dexter" <jfarnoud94@...> wrote:
>
> C. Petronius M. Moravio Quiritibusque s.p.d.,
>
> > False: The responsibility lies with the Consul to attain favorable auspices BEFORE calling the Senate to assemble. He did not.
>
> He did and you know that. He sent to you, as magister augurum, his agenda for a session. Begging too, if you cannot yourself take auspices, degelate to another augur.
>
> Lying is not a good thing, mostly for an augur.
>
> Optime vale.
>
> C. Petronius Dexter
> Tribunus Plebis Arcoiali scribebat
> a. d. XI Kalendas Septembres P. Memmio K. Fabio II coss.
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79523 From: marcushoratius Date: 2010-08-22
Subject: Re: And the farce continues...
M. Moravius dicit

No Augur refused. How often do you need to be told? ALL of the Augures have stated this fact.

You are not an augur, and you do not know the procedures we follow. Auspices may not be taken on certain days, certain times of the year, or under certain weather conditions. Augurs may not take auspices if they have any open wounds, if the wind blows out their lamps, and they are never to take auspices before purification and preparation. It is not a perfunctory ritual and it not to be made in a perfunctory manner. A magistrate must wait for the auspices to be taken, and therefore he must await augures time to prepare for the auspices to be taken properly. Do you have a problem understanding that too?

"Done well, is done soon enough," as Cato said, and taking the time to perform the auspices properly is not a refusal to take them. You ought to be advising your younger countryman in patience rather than falsely accusing others of being liars.





--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "petronius_dexter" <jfarnoud94@...> wrote:
>
> C. Petronius M. Moravio s.p.d.,
>
> If the consul wanted to obtain from augures auspices and beg you to perform auspicia, you are not able to refuse his demand even if the Senate is yet in session.
>
> Gods are able to give their response any time.
>
> In refusing to take auspices, you made by yourself an obstruction, that is all.
>
> Optime vale.
>
> C. Petronius Dexter
> Arcoiali scribebat
> a. d. XI Kalendas Septembres P. Memmio K. Fabio II coss.
>