Selected messages in Nova-Roma group. Aug 25-27, 2010

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79699 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2010-08-25
Subject: Mos maiorum and the Second Punic War
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79700 From: Cato Date: 2010-08-25
Subject: a.d. VIII Kal. Sept.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79701 From: marcushoratius Date: 2010-08-25
Subject: a. d. VIII Kalendas Septembris: OPICONSIVA
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79702 From: L. Livia Plauta Date: 2010-08-25
Subject: Re: Report of the August session of the Collegium Pontificum PRAETO
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79703 From: luciaiuliaaquila Date: 2010-08-25
Subject: Re: INVITATION CONVENTVS NOVAE ROMAE NORTH AMERICA
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79704 From: lathyrus77 Date: 2010-08-25
Subject: Re: Report of the August session of the Collegium Pontificum PRAETOR
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79705 From: lathyrus77 Date: 2010-08-25
Subject: Re: Report of the August session of the Collegium Pontificum PRAETO
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79706 From: Belle Morte Statia Date: 2010-08-25
Subject: Re: INVITATION CONVENTVS NOVAE ROMAE NORTH AMERICA
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79707 From: petronius_dexter Date: 2010-08-25
Subject: Re: INVITATION CONVENTVS NOVAE ROMAE NORTH AMERICA
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79708 From: Gnaea Livia Ocella Date: 2010-08-25
Subject: Re: INVITATION CONVENTVS NOVAE ROMAE NORTH AMERICA
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79709 From: rory12001 Date: 2010-08-25
Subject: Dissolution? [ was PRAETORIAL SCRIBAE]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79710 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2010-08-25
Subject: Re: Dissolution? [ was PRAETORIAL SCRIBAE]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79711 From: luciaiuliaaquila Date: 2010-08-25
Subject: Re: INVITATION CONVENTVS NOVAE ROMAE NORTH AMERICA
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79712 From: luciaiuliaaquila Date: 2010-08-25
Subject: Re: INVITATION CONVENTVS NOVAE ROMAE NORTH AMERICA
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79713 From: luciaiuliaaquila Date: 2010-08-25
Subject: Re: INVITATION CONVENTVS NOVAE ROMAE NORTH AMERICA
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79714 From: rory12001 Date: 2010-08-25
Subject: Re: DISSOLUTION? [ was PRAETORIAL SCRIBAE]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79715 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2010-08-25
Subject: Re: DISSOLUTION? [ was PRAETORIAL SCRIBAE]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79716 From: Gnaea Livia Ocella Date: 2010-08-25
Subject: Re: Dissolution? [ was PRAETORIAL SCRIBAE]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79717 From: rory12001 Date: 2010-08-25
Subject: Re: Dissolution? [ was PRAETORIAL SCRIBAE]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79718 From: Belle Morte Statia Date: 2010-08-25
Subject: Re: Dissolution? [ was PRAETORIAL SCRIBAE]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79719 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2010-08-25
Subject: Re: Dissolution? [ was PRAETORIAL SCRIBAE]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79720 From: Gnaea Livia Ocella Date: 2010-08-25
Subject: Re: Dissolution? [ was PRAETORIAL SCRIBAE]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79721 From: QFabiusMaxmi@aol.com Date: 2010-08-25
Subject: Re: DISSOLUTION?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79722 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2010-08-25
Subject: Re: INVITATION CONVENTVS NOVAE ROMAE NORTH AMERICA
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79723 From: M. Octavius Gracchus Date: 2010-08-25
Subject: Re: Dissolution? [ was PRAETORIAL SCRIBAE]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79724 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2010-08-25
Subject: Re: INVITATION CONVENTVS NOVAE ROMAE NORTH AMERICA
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79725 From: Gnaea Livia Ocella Date: 2010-08-25
Subject: Re: INVITATION CONVENTVS NOVAE ROMAE NORTH AMERICA
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79726 From: rory12001 Date: 2010-08-25
Subject: Re: Dissolution? [ was PRAETORIAL SCRIBAE]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79727 From: lathyrus77 Date: 2010-08-25
Subject: Re: DISSOLUTION?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79728 From: lathyrus77 Date: 2010-08-25
Subject: Re: Dissolution? [ was PRAETORIAL SCRIBAE]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79729 From: Belle Morte Statia Date: 2010-08-25
Subject: Re: INVITATION CONVENTVS NOVAE ROMAE NORTH AMERICA
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79730 From: M. Octavius Gracchus Date: 2010-08-25
Subject: the partitioning of Nova Roma.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79731 From: lathyrus77 Date: 2010-08-25
Subject: Re: the partitioning of Nova Roma.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79732 From: Publius Memmius Albucius Date: 2010-08-25
Subject: FW: [NovaRoma-Announce] Request for auspices (next Senate session)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79733 From: fauxrari Date: 2010-08-25
Subject: Re: INVITATION CONVENTVS NOVAE ROMAE NORTH AMERICA
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79734 From: luciaiuliaaquila Date: 2010-08-25
Subject: Re: INVITATION CONVENTVS NOVAE ROMAE NORTH AMERICA
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79735 From: luciaiuliaaquila Date: 2010-08-25
Subject: Re: INVITATION CONVENTVS NOVAE ROMAE NORTH AMERICA
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79736 From: C.Maria Caeca Date: 2010-08-25
Subject: Re: Polybius and Livy: The causes of the Second Punic War
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79737 From: C.Maria Caeca Date: 2010-08-25
Subject: Re: The Vestal Virgins and their imperial patrons: Sculptures and in
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79738 From: C.Maria Caeca Date: 2010-08-25
Subject: Re: The Sibyl: A voice in the borderlands
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79739 From: QFabiusMaxmi@aol.com Date: 2010-08-25
Subject: Re: INVITATION CONVENTVS NOVAE ROMAE NORTH AMERICA
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79740 From: lathyrus77 Date: 2010-08-25
Subject: Re: LOL oh Nova Roma
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79741 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2010-08-25
Subject: Re: INVITATION CONVENTVS NOVAE ROMAE NORTH AMERICA
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79742 From: Belle Morte Statia Date: 2010-08-25
Subject: Re: INVITATION CONVENTVS NOVAE ROMAE NORTH AMERICA
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79743 From: C.Maria Caeca Date: 2010-08-25
Subject: Re: INVITATION CONVENTVS NOVAE ROMAE NORTH AMERICA
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79744 From: luciaiuliaaquila Date: 2010-08-25
Subject: Re: INVITATION CONVENTVS NOVAE ROMAE NORTH AMERICA
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79745 From: luciaiuliaaquila Date: 2010-08-25
Subject: Re: INVITATION CONVENTVS NOVAE ROMAE NORTH AMERICA
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79746 From: M. Octavius Gracchus Date: 2010-08-25
Subject: Re: the partitioning of Nova Roma.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79747 From: gualterus_graecus Date: 2010-08-25
Subject: Re: the partitioning of Nova Roma.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79748 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2010-08-25
Subject: Re: INVITATION CONVENTVS NOVAE ROMAE NORTH AMERICA
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79749 From: lathyrus77 Date: 2010-08-25
Subject: Re: the partitioning of Nova Roma.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79750 From: Belle Morte Statia Date: 2010-08-25
Subject: Re: INVITATION CONVENTVS NOVAE ROMAE NORTH AMERICA
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79751 From: luciaiuliaaquila Date: 2010-08-25
Subject: Re: INVITATION CONVENTVS NOVAE ROMAE NORTH AMERICA
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79752 From: Belle Morte Statia Date: 2010-08-25
Subject: Re: INVITATION CONVENTVS NOVAE ROMAE NORTH AMERICA
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79753 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2010-08-25
Subject: Re: INVITATION CONVENTVS NOVAE ROMAE NORTH AMERICA
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79754 From: petronius_dexter Date: 2010-08-26
Subject: Re: the partitioning of Nova Roma.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79755 From: fauxrari Date: 2010-08-26
Subject: Re: INVITATION CONVENTVS NOVAE ROMAE NORTH AMERICA
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79756 From: rory12001 Date: 2010-08-26
Subject: Re: INVITATION CONVENTVS NOVAE ROMAE NORTH AMERICA
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79757 From: eagled2 Date: 2010-08-26
Subject: Re: A Facebook clone for Nova Roma
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79758 From: Publius Ullerius Stephanus Venator Date: 2010-08-26
Subject: Conventus - RSVP...
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79759 From: marcushoratius Date: 2010-08-26
Subject: a. d. VII Kalendas Septembris: Massinissa and Sophonisba
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79760 From: L. Livia Plauta Date: 2010-08-26
Subject: Re: INVITATION CONVENTVS NOVAE ROMAE NORTH AMERICA
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79761 From: L. Livia Plauta Date: 2010-08-26
Subject: Re: the partitioning of Nova Roma.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79762 From: L. Livia Plauta Date: 2010-08-26
Subject: Re: the partitioning of Nova Roma.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79763 From: luciaiuliaaquila Date: 2010-08-26
Subject: Re: Conventus - RSVP...
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79764 From: Belle Morte Statia Date: 2010-08-26
Subject: Re: INVITATION CONVENTVS NOVAE ROMAE NORTH AMERICA
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79765 From: Belle Morte Statia Date: 2010-08-26
Subject: Re: INVITATION CONVENTVS NOVAE ROMAE NORTH AMERICA
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79766 From: Gaius Date: 2010-08-26
Subject: Re: the partitioning of Nova Roma.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79767 From: Cn. Cornelius Lentulus Date: 2010-08-26
Subject: Nova Romans Meet Today!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79768 From: lathyrus77 Date: 2010-08-26
Subject: Re: the partitioning of Nova Roma.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79769 From: rory12001 Date: 2010-08-26
Subject: Re: INVITATION CONVENTVS NOVAE ROMAE NORTH AMERICA
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79770 From: Belle Morte Statia Date: 2010-08-26
Subject: Re: INVITATION CONVENTVS NOVAE ROMAE NORTH AMERICA
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79771 From: mcorvvs Date: 2010-08-26
Subject: Re: Nova Romans Meet Today!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79772 From: Belle Morte Statia Date: 2010-08-26
Subject: Re: Nova Romans Meet Today!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79773 From: rory12001 Date: 2010-08-26
Subject: Re: Nova Romans Meet Today!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79774 From: James V Hooper Date: 2010-08-26
Subject: Re: the partitioning of Nova Roma.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79775 From: rory12001 Date: 2010-08-26
Subject: Re: INVITATION CONVENTVS NOVAE ROMAE NORTH AMERICA
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79776 From: lathyrus77 Date: 2010-08-26
Subject: Re: the partitioning of Nova Roma.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79777 From: M. Octavius Gracchus Date: 2010-08-26
Subject: Re: the partitioning of Nova Roma.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79778 From: rory12001 Date: 2010-08-26
Subject: Re: the partitioning of Nova Roma.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79779 From: petronius_dexter Date: 2010-08-26
Subject: Re: the partitioning of Nova Roma.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79780 From: gualterus_graecus Date: 2010-08-26
Subject: Re: the partitioning of Nova Roma.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79781 From: gualterus_graecus Date: 2010-08-26
Subject: Re: the partitioning of Nova Roma.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79782 From: petronius_dexter Date: 2010-08-26
Subject: Re: the partitioning of Nova Roma.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79783 From: Publius Ullerius Stephanus Venator Date: 2010-08-26
Subject: Re: Conventus - RSVP...
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79784 From: M. Octavius Gracchus Date: 2010-08-26
Subject: Re: the partitioning of Nova Roma.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79785 From: gualterus_graecus Date: 2010-08-26
Subject: Re: the partitioning of Nova Roma.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79786 From: petronius_dexter Date: 2010-08-26
Subject: Re: the partitioning of Nova Roma.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79787 From: M. Octavius Gracchus Date: 2010-08-26
Subject: Re: the partitioning of Nova Roma.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79788 From: gualterus_graecus Date: 2010-08-26
Subject: Re: the partitioning of Nova Roma.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79789 From: lathyrus77 Date: 2010-08-26
Subject: Re: the partitioning of Nova Roma.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79790 From: gualterus_graecus Date: 2010-08-26
Subject: Re: the partitioning of Nova Roma.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79791 From: rory12001 Date: 2010-08-26
Subject: Toga Pulla help
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79792 From: C.Maria Caeca Date: 2010-08-26
Subject: Re: Toga Pulla help
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79793 From: C.Maria Caeca Date: 2010-08-26
Subject: Re: Toga Pulla help
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79794 From: rory12001 Date: 2010-08-26
Subject: Re: Toga Pulla help
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79795 From: deciusiunius Date: 2010-08-26
Subject: Re: the partitioning of Nova Roma.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79796 From: deciusiunius Date: 2010-08-26
Subject: Re: the partitioning of Nova Roma.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79797 From: lathyrus77 Date: 2010-08-26
Subject: Re: the partitioning of Nova Roma.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79798 From: deciusiunius Date: 2010-08-26
Subject: Re: the partitioning of Nova Roma.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79799 From: rory12001 Date: 2010-08-26
Subject: Re: the partitioning of Nova Roma.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79800 From: Cato Date: 2010-08-26
Subject: de Res Publica
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79801 From: lathyrus77 Date: 2010-08-27
Subject: Re: the partitioning of Nova Roma.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79802 From: lathyrus77 Date: 2010-08-27
Subject: Re: de Res Publica
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79803 From: rory12001 Date: 2010-08-27
Subject: Re: de Res Publica
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79804 From: lathyrus77 Date: 2010-08-27
Subject: Re: de Res Publica
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79805 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2010-08-27
Subject: Re: de Res Publica
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79806 From: gualterus_graecus Date: 2010-08-27
Subject: Re: de Res Publica
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79807 From: GAIUS MARCIUS CRISPUS Date: 2010-08-27
Subject: Re: the partitioning of Nova Roma.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79808 From: rory12001 Date: 2010-08-27
Subject: Re: de Res Publica
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79809 From: gualterus_graecus Date: 2010-08-27
Subject: Re: de Res Publica
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79810 From: luciaiuliaaquila Date: 2010-08-27
Subject: Corda Serrata Pando: Conventus - RSVP...
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79811 From: Kirsteen Wright Date: 2010-08-27
Subject: Re: Toga Pulla help
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79812 From: Publius Ullerius Stephanus Venator Date: 2010-08-27
Subject: Re: Corda Serrata Pando: Conventus - RSVP...
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79813 From: marcushoratius Date: 2010-08-27
Subject: a. d. VI Kalendas Septembris: VOLTURNALIA
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79814 From: marcushoratius Date: 2010-08-27
Subject: Re: de Res Publica
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79815 From: GAIUS MARCIUS CRISPUS Date: 2010-08-27
Subject: Re: de Res Publica
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79816 From: Cato Date: 2010-08-27
Subject: Re: de Res Publica
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79817 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2010-08-27
Subject: Re: de Res Publica
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79818 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2010-08-27
Subject: Re: de Res Publica
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79819 From: petronius_dexter Date: 2010-08-27
Subject: Re: Corda Serrata Pando: Conventus - RSVP...
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79820 From: lathyrus77 Date: 2010-08-27
Subject: Re: de Res Publica
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79821 From: deciusiunius Date: 2010-08-27
Subject: Re: the partitioning of Nova Roma.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79822 From: lathyrus77 Date: 2010-08-27
Subject: Re: the partitioning of Nova Roma.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79823 From: luciaiuliaaquila Date: 2010-08-27
Subject: Re: Corda Serrata Pando: Conventus - RSVP...
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79824 From: deciusiunius Date: 2010-08-27
Subject: Re: the partitioning of Nova Roma.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79825 From: Michael K Date: 2010-08-27
Subject: Re: the partitioning of Nova Roma.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79826 From: Belle Morte Statia Date: 2010-08-27
Subject: Re: Corda Serrata Pando: Conventus - RSVP...
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79827 From: QFabiusMaxmi@aol.com Date: 2010-08-27
Subject: Re: de Res Publica
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79828 From: lathyrus77 Date: 2010-08-27
Subject: Re: de Res Publica
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79829 From: Marcia Regina Date: 2010-08-27
Subject: Re: the partitioning of Nova Roma.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79830 From: M. Octavius Gracchus Date: 2010-08-27
Subject: Re: de Res Publica
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79831 From: petronius_dexter Date: 2010-08-27
Subject: Re: de Re Publica
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79832 From: luciaiuliaaquila Date: 2010-08-27
Subject: Re: Corda Serrata Pando: Conventus - RSVP...
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79833 From: Gnaeus Iulius Caesar Date: 2010-08-27
Subject: Re: de Res Publica
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79834 From: lathyrus77 Date: 2010-08-27
Subject: Re: de Res Publica
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79835 From: luciaiuliaaquila Date: 2010-08-27
Subject: Re: Corda Serrata Pando: Conventus - RSVP...
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79836 From: Publius Ullerius Stephanus Venator Date: 2010-08-27
Subject: Re: Corda Serrata Pando: Conventus - RSVP...
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79837 From: qvalerius Date: 2010-08-27
Subject: Re: de Res Publica
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79838 From: qvalerius Date: 2010-08-27
Subject: Re: Corda Serrata Pando: Conventus - RSVP...
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79839 From: M. Octavius Gracchus Date: 2010-08-27
Subject: Re: de Re Publica
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79840 From: qvalerius Date: 2010-08-27
Subject: Re: de Re Publica
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79841 From: Michael K Date: 2010-08-27
Subject: Re: the partitioning of Nova Roma (Marcia Regina).
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79842 From: lathyrus77 Date: 2010-08-27
Subject: Re: the partitioning of Nova Roma (Marcia Regina).
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79843 From: Publius Memmius Albucius Date: 2010-08-27
Subject: On a possible partition of NR - a consular statement
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79844 From: Belle Morte Statia Date: 2010-08-27
Subject: Re: de Res Publica
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79845 From: lathyrus77 Date: 2010-08-27
Subject: Re: de Res Publica
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79846 From: Belle Morte Statia Date: 2010-08-27
Subject: Re: de Res Publica
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79847 From: C.Maria Caeca Date: 2010-08-27
Subject: Re: de Res Publica
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79848 From: lathyrus77 Date: 2010-08-27
Subject: Re: de Res Publica
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79849 From: Belle Morte Statia Date: 2010-08-27
Subject: Re: de Res Publica
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79850 From: lathyrus77 Date: 2010-08-27
Subject: Re: de Res Publica
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79851 From: Gaius Lucretius Seneca Date: 2010-08-27
Subject: Re: de Res Publica
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79852 From: M. Octavius Gracchus Date: 2010-08-27
Subject: Re: On a possible partition of NR - a consular statement
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79854 From: rory12001 Date: 2010-08-27
Subject: Re: On a possible partition of NR - a consular statement
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79855 From: lathyrus77 Date: 2010-08-27
Subject: Re: de Res Publica
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79856 From: C.Maria Caeca Date: 2010-08-27
Subject: Re: On a possible partition of NR - a consular statement
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79857 From: Belle Morte Statia Date: 2010-08-27
Subject: Re: Corda Serrata Pando: Conventus - RSVP...
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79858 From: Terry Wilson Date: 2010-08-27
Subject: Re: de Res Publica
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79859 From: M. Octavius Gracchus Date: 2010-08-27
Subject: Re: On a possible partition of NR - a consular statement
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79860 From: lathyrus77 Date: 2010-08-27
Subject: Re: de Res Publica
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79861 From: Gaius Tullius Valerianus Date: 2010-08-27
Subject: Re: de Res Publica
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79862 From: lathyrus77 Date: 2010-08-27
Subject: Re: On a possible partition of NR - a consular statement
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79863 From: Cato Date: 2010-08-27
Subject: Re: de Res Publica
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79864 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2010-08-27
Subject: Re: On a possible partition of NR - a consular statement
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79865 From: rory12001 Date: 2010-08-27
Subject: Re: On a possible partition of NR - a consular statement
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79866 From: rory12001 Date: 2010-08-27
Subject: Re: On a possible partition of NR - a consular statement
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79867 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2010-08-27
Subject: Re: On a possible partition of NR - a consular statement
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79868 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2010-08-27
Subject: Re: On a possible partition of NR - a consular statement
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79869 From: lathyrus77 Date: 2010-08-27
Subject: Partition Discussion - Pronvinces
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79870 From: rory12001 Date: 2010-08-27
Subject: Re: On a possible partition of NR - a consular statement
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79871 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2010-08-27
Subject: Re: On a possible partition of NR - a consular statement
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79872 From: Cato Date: 2010-08-27
Subject: Re: On a possible partition of NR - a consular statement
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79873 From: lathyrus77 Date: 2010-08-27
Subject: Re: On a possible partition of NR - a consular statement
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79875 From: Cato Date: 2010-08-27
Subject: Re: On a possible partition of NR - a consular statement
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79876 From: lathyrus77 Date: 2010-08-27
Subject: Re: On a possible partition of NR - a consular statement



Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79699 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2010-08-25
Subject: Mos maiorum and the Second Punic War
*Mos maiorum and the Second Punic War*
by *Vallis, Annamarie*, M.A., California State University, Fresno, 2006 , 93
pages; AAT 1445022
Abstract (Summary)

Ancient Rome bequeathed as a legacy to the world a Greco-Roman culture, law,
administration, architecture, and Christianity. Roman tradition and custom,
that which was customarily accepted as precedent, *mos maiorum, * would come
to be challenged at a time when Rome needed to adapt to the changes brought
forth by the Second *Punic* War.

This second war with Carthage witnessed many changes to long-standing
tradition, but this in and of itself was not wholly unconventional. What set
this war apart from other conflicts was the active participation of a
legendary Roman statesman, Quintus Fabius Maximus. His participation offers
readers a glimpse at the workings of *mos maiorum * during a time of
incredible pressure on the people of Italy. This window into the past is
illustrative in that one can see the amendments to custom materialize due in
part to the new and liberal thinking of the traditionally conservative
Fabius.


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79700 From: Cato Date: 2010-08-25
Subject: a.d. VIII Kal. Sept.
Cato omnibus in foro SPD

Hodie est ante diem VIII Kalendas Septembris; hic dies nefastus
publicus est.

"Hanc autem deam Opem Saturni coniugem crediderunt, et ideo hoc mense
Saturnalia itemque Opalia celebrari, quod Saturnus eiusque uxor tam
frugum quam fructuum repertores esse credantur: itaque omni iam fetu
agrorum coacto ab hominibus hos deos coli quasi vitae cultioris
auctores: quos etiam nonnullis caelum ac terram esse persuasum est,
Saturnumque a satu dictum, cuius causa de caelo est, et terram Opem,
cuius ope humanae vitae alimenta quaeruntur, vel ab opere per quod
fructus frugesque nascuntur. Huic deae sedentes vota concipiunt,
terramque de industria tangunt, demonstrantes ipsam matrem terram esse
mortalibus adpetendam." - Macrobius, Saturnalia I.X.19-21

"Opeconsiva dies ab dea Ope Consiva, cuius in Regia sacrarium quod
adeo artum, eo praeter virgines Vestales et sacerdotem publicum
introeat nemo. 'Is cum eat, suffibulum ut habeat,' scriptum: id
dicitur ab suffigendo subfigabulum." - Varro, de Lingua Latina 6.22

Today is the celebration of the Opiconsivia, in honor of the goddess
Ops. Ops, the Earth Mother, also is considered the Great Mother of
the Gods, and the Great Goddess. As such, Ops is a manifestation of
Rhea, Cybele, Demeter, and so on, personifying the earth as the giver
of all riches.

"A female Roman divinity of plenty and fertility, as is indicated by her nane, which is connected with opinus, opuleidus, iopsq, anid copia. (Fest. p. 186. &c. ed. Müller.) She was regarded as the wife of Saturnus, and, accordingly, as the protectress of every thing connected with agriculture. Her abode was in the earth, and hence those who invoked her, or made vows to her, used to touch the ground (Macrob. Sat. i. 10), and as she was believed to give to human beings both their place of abode and their food, newly-born children were recommended to her care. (August. de Civ Dei, iv. 11, 21.) Her worship was intimately connected with that of her husband Saturnus, for she had both temples and festivals in common with him; she had, however, also a separate sanctuary on the Capitol, and in the vicus jugarius, not far from the temple of Saturnus, she had an altar in common with Ceres. (Liv. xxxix. 22; P. Vict. Req. Urb. viii ) The festivals of Ops are called Opalia and Opiconsivia, from her surname Consita, connected with the verb serere, to sow. (Fest. 1. c. ; Macrob. Sat. i. 10, 12.)" - Roman Myth Index (http://www.mythindex.com/roman-mythology/O/Ops.html)

Her consort, the god Consus, is the protector of grains and
subterranean storage bins (silos), and as such was represented by a
corn seed. He became confused with the god of counsel because of the
linguistic similarity, but is entirely distinct from that god. The
festival of Consus, the Consualia, was celebrated twice a year: once
on August 21, after the harvest, and once on December 15, after the
sowing of crops was finished. The Consualia was instituted by Romulus,
and commemorated the rape (and insemination) of the Sabine women by
the Romans. Consus was eventually identified with Neptunus Equester,
the alternative name and counterpart of Poseidon Hippios. Neptune had been associated with the animal since archaic times.

The Opiconsivia festival was superintended the Vestals and the
Flamines of Quirinus, an early Sabine god said to be the deified
Romulus, absorbed and being included in the first and earliest
Capitoline Triad, along with Mars — then an agriculture god — and Jupiter. The main priestess at the regia wore a white veil, characteristic of the vestal virgins. A chariot race was performed in the Circus Maximus. Horses and mules, their heads crowned with chaplets made of flowers, also partook in the celebration.

Opis was deemed a chthonic (underworld, inside the earth) goddess who
made the vegetation grow. Since her abode was inside the earth, Ops
was invoked by her worshipers while sitting, with their hands touching
the ground, according to Macrobius. Consus seems to be an alternate
name of Saturn in the chthonic aspect as consort, since he is also
held to be the husband of Ops. Festus identifies her husband as
Saturn: "Ops is said to be the wife of Saturn. By her they designated
the earth, because the earth distributes all goods to the human
gender" (203.19).

Valete bene!

Cato
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79701 From: marcushoratius Date: 2010-08-25
Subject: a. d. VIII Kalendas Septembris: OPICONSIVA
M. Moravius Piscinus Pontifex Maximus Quiritibus cultoribus Deorum et omnibus salutem plurimam dicit: Salvete, vosque bona Ops Opiferi auctet ope.

Hodie est ante diem VIII Kalendas Septembres; haec dies nefastus piaculum est: OPICONSIVA

"The day named Opeconsiva is so named from Ops Consiva, 'Bountiful Lady of Planting,' whose shrine is in the Regia; it is so restricted in size that no one may enter it except the Vestales Virgines and the sacerdos publica. 'When he goes there, let him wear a white veil (suffibulum),' is the direction. This suffibulum is named as if from sub-figabulum from suffigere, 'to fasten down.'" ~ M. Terrentius Varro, Lingua Latinae 6.21

The sacrarium Opis would seem to have been the pantry of the Regia. One theory holds that the sacerdos publica, was either the Rex Sacrorum or a pontifex standing in for the former kings while the Vestales represented the king's daughters. But this idea does not explain the pontifical instruction that the sacerdos is veiled as a Vestal. Another possibility is that the sacerdos publica was the flamen Quirinalis. There is a close connection between the Vestales and the flamen Quirinalis, a connection that is not fully understood. There is, for example, the story of the approach of the Gauls in 390 BCE and how it was the flamen Quirinalis rather than the pontifex maximus or Rex Sacrorum, who instructed the Vestales on what sacred relics to bury for safety and which to carry to the safety of Caere (Livy 5.39). Only days earlier, on 21 August, the flamen Quirinalis and Vestales Virgines joined together in sacrificing to Consus. In similar fashion, in December there is a conjunction of festivals for Consus (15 Dec.) and Ops (19 Dec.) with a four day interval. In December the festival of Saturninus comes between those for Consus and Ops, while in August it is a festival for Volcanus. The cold, moist earth of winter and the hot, dry earth of summer are framed, in Consus and Ops, by the male and female personifications of the bountiful earth.

The sacerdos and Vestales Virgines sacrifice this day to Ops as a Mother Earth in much the same way as the flamen Quirinalis and Vestales Virgines had done days earlier for Consus. While we may note parallels and connections that seem to appear, it is now lost to us as to why the sacerdos would on this occasion so uncharacteristically donned the veil of a Vestal.


AUC 057 / 246 BCE: Dedication of the Temple of Libertas on the Aventine Hill.

The first Temple of Libertas was financed by fines collected by the Aedilis Plebis Tiberius Sempronius Gracchus, who became consul in 238 BCE. He was the father of Consul Tiberius Gracchus who defeated Hanno on the River Caloirs at the Battle of Beneventum, 214 BCE. Most of his legions were composed of volunteer slaves. Following the battle, Gracchus freed the slaves and then commemorated the event with a painting in the Temple of Libertas (Livy 26.16).

This Temple of Libertas is not to be confused with the Atrium Libertatis that served as offices of the Censors where their records were stored along with the laws written on bronze tablets. The Atrium Libertatis was restored by Censores Aelius and Cornelius Cethegus in 194 BCE, during the consulship of yet another Tiberius Sempronius Gracchus who was the father of the Tribuni Plebis Gracchus brothers Tiberius and Gaius (Livy 34.44). At times this building was used as a place for detained hostages, as with the Thurians in 212 BCE (Livy 25.7.12). And during the trial of Milo for the murder of Clodius, the Atrium Libertatis was used to torture slaves held as witnesses (Cicero, Pro Milo 59). During the reign of Augustus the Atrium burned. It was restored once more by Assinius Pollio who then placed the first public library in his restored Atrium of Libertatis, the dedication occurring on 1 September (Suetonius, Augustus 29; Ovid Tristium 3.1.72).

In 58 BCE, after Cicero fled Rome rather than face exile, Tribunus Plebis Clodius Pulcher dedicated a shrine of Libertas on the Palatine over the ruins of Cicero's razed house. Later, returning after Clodius died in a fight with the gang of Milo, Cicero was to regain his land when the Collegium Pontificum declared that the shrine had been improperly dedicated.

Yet another Temple of Libertas was voted by the Senate in 46 BCE to honor Julius Caesar. This temple was never built, however, and instead a statue of Libertas was set up in the Forum of Julius Caesar that was later dedicated by Augustus. Today's festival concerns only the original Temple of Libertas built by Tiberius Gracchus on the Aventine.


AUC 832 / 79 CE: Eruption of Vesuvius continues; death of G. Plinius Secundus maior

"You could hear the shrieks of women, the wailing of infants, and the shouting of men; some were calling their parents, others their children or their wives, trying to recognize them by their voices. People bewailed their own fate or that of their relatives, and there were some who prayed for death in their terror of dying. Many besought the aid of the gods, but still more imagined there were no gods left, and that the universe was plunged into eternal darkness for evermore." ~ G. Plinius Caecilius Secundus minor, Letter 6.20 to Corneliue Tacitus


"Meanwhile on Mount Vesuvius broad sheets of fire and leaping flames blazed at several points, their bright glare emphasized by the darkness of night. My uncle tried to allay the fears of his companions by repeatedly declaring that these were nothing but bonfires left by the peasants in their terror, or else empty houses on fire in the districts they had abandoned. Then he went to rest and certainly slept, for as he was a stout man his breathing was rather loud and heavy and could be heard by people coming and going outside his door. By this time the courtyard giving access to his room was full of ashes mixed with pumice stones, so that its level had risen, and if he had stayed in the room any longer he would never have got out. He was wakened, came out and joined Pomponianus and the rest of the household who had sat up all night.

"They debated whether to stay indoors or take their chance in the open, for the buildings were now shaking with violent shocks, and seemed to be swaying to and fro as if they were torn from their foundations. Outside, on the other hand, there was the danger of failing pumice stones, even though these were light and porous; however, after comparing the risks they chose the latter. In my uncle's case one reason outweighed the other, but for the others it was a choice of fears. As a protection against falling objects they put pillows on their heads tied down with cloths.

"Elsewhere there was daylight by this time, but they were still in darkness, blacker and denser than any ordinary night, which they relieved by lighting torches and various kinds of lamp. My uncle decided to go down to the shore and investigate on the spot the possibility of any escape by sea, but he found the waves still wild and dangerous. A sheet was spread on the ground for him to lie down, and he repeatedly asked for cold water to drink.

"Then the flames and smell of sulphur which gave warning of the approaching fire drove the others to take flight and roused him to stand up. He stood leaning on two slaves and then suddenly collapsed, I imagine because the dense, fumes choked his breathing by blocking his windpipe which was constitutionally weak and narrow and often inflamed. When daylight returned on the 26th - two days after the last day he had been seen - his body was found intact and uninjured, still fully clothed and looking more like sleep than death." ~ G. Plinius Caecilius Secundus minor, Letter 6.16 to Corneliue Tacitus


Today's thought is from Stobaeus, Ethical Sentences 6:

"Wealth is an infirm anchor, glory is still more infirm; and in a similar manner, the body, dominion, and honor. For all these are imbecile and powerless. What then are powerful anchors? Prudence, magnanimity, and fortitude. These no tempest can shake. This is the Law of God, that virtue is the only thing that is strong; and that everything else is a trifle."



Religio_Romana_Cultorum_Deorum-subscribe@yahoogroups.com

_____________________
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79702 From: L. Livia Plauta Date: 2010-08-25
Subject: Re: Report of the August session of the Collegium Pontificum PRAETO
Livia Hortensiae sal.

Apparently it's too much. Now even people I considered as friends have
joined the mobbing action against you.

I'm starting to think we should all leave Nova Roma, and leave it in the
hands of Cato, Sulla, Octavius, etc., which is obviously the aim they are
trying to reach. But after they got what they want they would only have each
other to hurl insults at.

Optime vale,
Livia

----- Original Message -----
From: "rory12001" <rory12001@...>
To: <Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Wednesday, August 25, 2010 6:12 AM
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Report of the August session of the Collegium
Pontificum PRAETORIAL SCRIBAE


M. Hortensia Scribae spd;

is it asking too much to be able to post without this incessant barrage
of insults? It isn't funny it creates an ML where others fear to post; for
fear next time it will be THEM.,,,

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "petronius_dexter" <jfarnoud94@...> wrote:
>
> Ave Sulla,
>
> It seems to me that many stories by Stephen King have the Maine as
> theater...
>
> So perhaps that explains this Maior's mind capture...
>
> Vale.
>
> C. Petronius Dexter
> Arcoiali scribebat
> a. d. VIII Kalendas Septembres P. Memmio K. Fabio II coss.
>
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Robert Woolwine <robert.woolwine@>
> wrote:
> >
> > *Whack*
> >
> > *WHACK*
> >
> > Misery, gotta love how Stephen King has captured the essence of Maior.
> >
> > Vale,
> >
> > Sulla
> >
> > On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 2:12 PM, rory12001 <rory12001@> wrote:
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > M. Hortensia Piscino Quiritibus spd;
> > >
> > > Piscine; my friend from Hibernia, Lupus, wrote to me about Nova Roma
> > > "I
> > > can't believe how bad it's got"....
> > >
> > > I won't participate in the endless online name-calling, arguing
> > > etc...It's
> > > a waste, Nova Roma's ML is dominated by a samll group of destructive
> > > people
> > > who have no desire to make or do anything positive on behalf of the
> > > Religio
> > > Romana or living Roman culture.
> > >
> > > di me favet
> > > M. Hortensia Maior
> > >
> > > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com <Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com>,
> > > "marcushoratius" <MHoratius@> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Salve Cato
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com <Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com>,
> > > > "Cato"
> > > <catoinnyc@> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Cato Maiori sal.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com <Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com>,
> > > "rory12001" <rory12001@> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Salve Palladi;
> > > > > > all the cultores including me & the majority of the CP have the
> > > highest regard for M. Moravius Piscinus
> > > > >
> > > > > CATO: another lie, and one that is on its face self-contradictory.
> > > > > I
> > > can name at least five cultores - including at least two pontiffs,
> > > both
> > > cultores - who do NOT hold Piscinus in any kind of regard at all and
> > > who, in
> > > fact, hold him responsible for the very worst damage done to the
> > > Respublica
> > > over the past three or four years.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > PISCINUS: You may want to reread this, and apologize for calling
> > > Hortensia a liar. She said "the majority of the CP." Two out of how
> > > many
> > > cultores who are in the Collegium Pontificum? Can't please everyone.
> > > And
> > > cultores would not agree with you that Pontifex Q. Fabius Maximus is a
> > > cultor Deorum at all when he advocates temple prostitution. What he
> > > practices and advocates is some Hollywood perversion of the religio
> > > Romana.
> > > >
> > > > And, yes, you do write a lot, but apparently you are a very poor
> > > > reader,
> > > for you find words that aren't written and miscomprehend those that
> > > are.
> > > >
> > > > Vale
> > > >
> > > > M. Moravius Piscinus
> > > > Pontifex Maximus
> > > > Magister Collegii Augurum
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79703 From: luciaiuliaaquila Date: 2010-08-25
Subject: Re: INVITATION CONVENTVS NOVAE ROMAE NORTH AMERICA
Salve, et salvete,

To all Novi Romani, all without exception, I ask you to please plan to come to this event; we must come together and get to know each other away from the ML.
We must put our heads together in meetings and enjoyable activities, planned and impromptu, as Romans and work towards pulling our Respublica from the depths in which She now wallows.

We must put all animosity aside, or at least apply strong virtues and work through it.
I am not expecting us to hold hands around the campfire and sing kumbaya - although with enough Mulsum this could happen but I warn you, should this occur, I *will* document it with photos:)
I do expect as adults with a common interest we will find that commonality that will bind us together as Romans and we will come to a place where we can all move forward towards a Res publica we can all be proud to be a part of.

I cannot think of one Nova Roman citizen who I would not want to meet and engage in a discussion with.
Certainly there are many I could learn a great deal from, as well as those who I may form a close bond of friendship with.

It's time citizens, esp. those citizens in North America - I am asking this of you Canada and Mexico as well - make your travel plans to join us in South Carolina in six weeks.
More info here, including a link to the Conventus yahoo ML:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma/message/79658

I also would like to take this moment to extend to those Novi Romani outside of North America to come and join us if you can. Airfares will be less expensive at that time of the year and there are many deals going on now. Free camping onsite is available and select members of the Provincia Cohors and Aedilician Cohors will assist you with lodging should you not wish to camp.

The Conventus promises to be a wonderful event even though Rota and I may be so exhausted by the time of its commencement that we may have to be carried about on lecticae:,)

Thank you Maior for the kind words.

Thank you all Novi Romani for taking a few moments to read this post.

Vale optime,

L. Iulia Aquila
Ædilis Curulis Novæ Romæ





--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "rory12001" <rory12001@...> wrote:
>
> Euge! Julia;
> this is what it's all about. You and Rota are fantastic I've bought my tickets and I'll be there:) See you all fellow Novi Romani!
> optime valete
> Maior
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79704 From: lathyrus77 Date: 2010-08-25
Subject: Re: Report of the August session of the Collegium Pontificum PRAETOR
I guess I was booted from the BA for insulting your twin brother then.


--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Robert Woolwine <robert.woolwine@...> wrote:
>
> It wont be us because we are not as foolish as you are.
>
> And, I have the BA. Anyone can joke about me in an free environment on that
> list - they have in the past and they probably will do so in the future - it
> never has bothered me.
>
> Vale,
>
> Sulla
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79705 From: lathyrus77 Date: 2010-08-25
Subject: Re: Report of the August session of the Collegium Pontificum PRAETO
--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "L. Livia Plauta" <livia.plauta@...> wrote:
>
> Livia Hortensiae sal.
>
> Apparently it's too much. Now even people I considered as friends have
> joined the mobbing action against you.
>
> I'm starting to think we should all leave Nova Roma, and leave it in the
> hands of Cato, Sulla, Octavius, etc., which is obviously the aim they are
> trying to reach. But after they got what they want they would only have each
> other to hurl insults at.
>
> Optime vale,
> Livia
>


Exactly.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79706 From: Belle Morte Statia Date: 2010-08-25
Subject: Re: INVITATION CONVENTVS NOVAE ROMAE NORTH AMERICA
Statia Aeternia Iuliae Aquilae sal:


Wow this looks like you all will have a blast for sure! What's the status
on garb? Will you have vendors there who specialize in Roman Clothing and
Weaponry? Actually the most important question, will there be vendors who
specialize in Roman Clothing that cater those of the curvesque nature??

Important Questions :-)

Vale Optime,
Statia Aeternia

On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 8:36 AM, luciaiuliaaquila <
luciaiuliaaquila@...> wrote:

>
>
> Salve, et salvete,
>
> To all Novi Romani, all without exception, I ask you to please plan to come
> to this event; we must come together and get to know each other away from
> the ML.
> We must put our heads together in meetings and enjoyable activities,
> planned and impromptu, as Romans and work towards pulling our Respublica
> from the depths in which She now wallows.
>
> We must put all animosity aside, or at least apply strong virtues and work
> through it.
> I am not expecting us to hold hands around the campfire and sing kumbaya -
> although with enough Mulsum this could happen but I warn you, should this
> occur, I *will* document it with photos:)
> I do expect as adults with a common interest we will find that commonality
> that will bind us together as Romans and we will come to a place where we
> can all move forward towards a Res publica we can all be proud to be a part
> of.
>
> I cannot think of one Nova Roman citizen who I would not want to meet and
> engage in a discussion with.
> Certainly there are many I could learn a great deal from, as well as those
> who I may form a close bond of friendship with.
>
> It's time citizens, esp. those citizens in North America - I am asking this
> of you Canada and Mexico as well - make your travel plans to join us in
> South Carolina in six weeks.
> More info here, including a link to the Conventus yahoo ML:
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma/message/79658
>
> I also would like to take this moment to extend to those Novi Romani
> outside of North America to come and join us if you can. Airfares will be
> less expensive at that time of the year and there are many deals going on
> now. Free camping onsite is available and select members of the Provincia
> Cohors and Aedilician Cohors will assist you with lodging should you not
> wish to camp.
>
> The Conventus promises to be a wonderful event even though Rota and I may
> be so exhausted by the time of its commencement that we may have to be
> carried about on lecticae:,)
>
> Thank you Maior for the kind words.
>
> Thank you all Novi Romani for taking a few moments to read this post.
>
> Vale optime,
>
> L. Iulia Aquila
> �dilis Curulis Nov� Rom�
>
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com <Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com>,
> "rory12001" <rory12001@...> wrote:
> >
> > Euge! Julia;
> > this is what it's all about. You and Rota are fantastic I've bought my
> tickets and I'll be there:) See you all fellow Novi Romani!
> > optime valete
> > Maior
> >
>
>
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79707 From: petronius_dexter Date: 2010-08-25
Subject: Re: INVITATION CONVENTVS NOVAE ROMAE NORTH AMERICA
C. Petronius L. Juliae et omnibus s.p.d.,

> All are Invited to Attend the
> II CONVENTVS NOVAE ROMAE NORTH AMERICA

I promiss that I will do all I can to be with you all at this Conventus.

Unfortunately my passport was valid untill 2002. I did not need to update it because of the Sheingen Zone and licence to travel within Europe Union only with my French Identity card.

But it is more difficult now to me to go in US that it was for La Fayette.

I have to update my passport and obtain Visa. I will begin the procees to obtain these papers since tomorrow Thursday August 25th, hoping that I will obtain all those papers for October 8th in order to be with you all at this North America Conventus.

Optime valete.

C. Petronius Dexter
Arcoiali scribebat
a. d. VIII Kalendas Septembres P. Memmio K. Fabio II coss.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79708 From: Gnaea Livia Ocella Date: 2010-08-25
Subject: Re: INVITATION CONVENTVS NOVAE ROMAE NORTH AMERICA
Cn. Livia Ocella L. Iuliae Aquilae omnibus SPD,

This sounds like a wonderful event! Unfortunately I cannot attend for a couple of reasons (busy time of the school year, as well as it being Canadian Thanksgiving weekend), but how frequent are events like this held? I would love to attend a conventus in future if possible, but I worry that I am passing up a rare chance in this case.

Optime vale et valete,
Ocella

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "luciaiuliaaquila" <luciaiuliaaquila@...> wrote:
>
> Salve, et salvete,
>
> To all Novi Romani, all without exception, I ask you to please plan to come to this event; we must come together and get to know each other away from the ML.
> We must put our heads together in meetings and enjoyable activities, planned and impromptu, as Romans and work towards pulling our Respublica from the depths in which She now wallows.
>
> We must put all animosity aside, or at least apply strong virtues and work through it.
> I am not expecting us to hold hands around the campfire and sing kumbaya - although with enough Mulsum this could happen but I warn you, should this occur, I *will* document it with photos:)
> I do expect as adults with a common interest we will find that commonality that will bind us together as Romans and we will come to a place where we can all move forward towards a Res publica we can all be proud to be a part of.
>
> I cannot think of one Nova Roman citizen who I would not want to meet and engage in a discussion with.
> Certainly there are many I could learn a great deal from, as well as those who I may form a close bond of friendship with.
>
> It's time citizens, esp. those citizens in North America - I am asking this of you Canada and Mexico as well - make your travel plans to join us in South Carolina in six weeks.
> More info here, including a link to the Conventus yahoo ML:
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma/message/79658
>
> I also would like to take this moment to extend to those Novi Romani outside of North America to come and join us if you can. Airfares will be less expensive at that time of the year and there are many deals going on now. Free camping onsite is available and select members of the Provincia Cohors and Aedilician Cohors will assist you with lodging should you not wish to camp.
>
> The Conventus promises to be a wonderful event even though Rota and I may be so exhausted by the time of its commencement that we may have to be carried about on lecticae:,)
>
> Thank you Maior for the kind words.
>
> Thank you all Novi Romani for taking a few moments to read this post.
>
> Vale optime,
>
> L. Iulia Aquila
> Ædilis Curulis Novæ Romæ
>
>
>
>
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "rory12001" <rory12001@> wrote:
> >
> > Euge! Julia;
> > this is what it's all about. You and Rota are fantastic I've bought my tickets and I'll be there:) See you all fellow Novi Romani!
> > optime valete
> > Maior
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79709 From: rory12001 Date: 2010-08-25
Subject: Dissolution? [ was PRAETORIAL SCRIBAE]
Maior Liviae spd;
I'm beginning to think you are right amica, we could re-form enjoy our friends, the gods, Romanitas without all the toxic fighting.

The membership of NR could vote for dissolution: I checked the statue below, we could even do it before a board resolution to show the Senate just what the silent majority think.

http://www.mainelegislature.org/legis/statutes/13-b/title13-Bsec1101.html

>
> Livia Hortensiae sal.
>
> Apparently it's too much. Now even people I considered as friends have
> joined the mobbing action against you.
>
> I'm starting to think we should all leave Nova Roma, and leave it in the
> hands of Cato, Sulla, Octavius, etc., which is obviously the aim they are
> trying to reach. But after they got what they want they would only have each
> other to hurl insults at.
>
> Optime vale,
> Livia
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "rory12001" <rory12001@>
> To: <Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, August 25, 2010 6:12 AM
> Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Report of the August session of the Collegium
> Pontificum PRAETORIAL SCRIBAE
>
>
> M. Hortensia Scribae spd;
>
> is it asking too much to be able to post without this incessant barrage
> of insults? It isn't funny it creates an ML where others fear to post; for
> fear next time it will be THEM.,,,
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "petronius_dexter" <jfarnoud94@> wrote:
> >
> > Ave Sulla,
> >
> > It seems to me that many stories by Stephen King have the Maine as
> > theater...
> >
> > So perhaps that explains this Maior's mind capture...
> >
> > Vale.
> >
> > C. Petronius Dexter
> > Arcoiali scribebat
> > a. d. VIII Kalendas Septembres P. Memmio K. Fabio II coss.
> >
> >
> > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Robert Woolwine <robert.woolwine@>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > *Whack*
> > >
> > > *WHACK*
> > >
> > > Misery, gotta love how Stephen King has captured the essence of Maior.
> > >
> > > Vale,
> > >
> > > Sulla
> > >
> > > On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 2:12 PM, rory12001 <rory12001@> wrote:
> > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > M. Hortensia Piscino Quiritibus spd;
> > > >
> > > > Piscine; my friend from Hibernia, Lupus, wrote to me about Nova Roma
> > > > "I
> > > > can't believe how bad it's got"....
> > > >
> > > > I won't participate in the endless online name-calling, arguing
> > > > etc...It's
> > > > a waste, Nova Roma's ML is dominated by a samll group of destructive
> > > > people
> > > > who have no desire to make or do anything positive on behalf of the
> > > > Religio
> > > > Romana or living Roman culture.
> > > >
> > > > di me favet
> > > > M. Hortensia Maior
> > > >
> > > > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com <Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com>,
> > > > "marcushoratius" <MHoratius@> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Salve Cato
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com <Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com>,
> > > > > "Cato"
> > > > <catoinnyc@> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Cato Maiori sal.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com <Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com>,
> > > > "rory12001" <rory12001@> wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Salve Palladi;
> > > > > > > all the cultores including me & the majority of the CP have the
> > > > highest regard for M. Moravius Piscinus
> > > > > >
> > > > > > CATO: another lie, and one that is on its face self-contradictory.
> > > > > > I
> > > > can name at least five cultores - including at least two pontiffs,
> > > > both
> > > > cultores - who do NOT hold Piscinus in any kind of regard at all and
> > > > who, in
> > > > fact, hold him responsible for the very worst damage done to the
> > > > Respublica
> > > > over the past three or four years.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > PISCINUS: You may want to reread this, and apologize for calling
> > > > Hortensia a liar. She said "the majority of the CP." Two out of how
> > > > many
> > > > cultores who are in the Collegium Pontificum? Can't please everyone.
> > > > And
> > > > cultores would not agree with you that Pontifex Q. Fabius Maximus is a
> > > > cultor Deorum at all when he advocates temple prostitution. What he
> > > > practices and advocates is some Hollywood perversion of the religio
> > > > Romana.
> > > > >
> > > > > And, yes, you do write a lot, but apparently you are a very poor
> > > > > reader,
> > > > for you find words that aren't written and miscomprehend those that
> > > > are.
> > > > >
> > > > > Vale
> > > > >
> > > > > M. Moravius Piscinus
> > > > > Pontifex Maximus
> > > > > Magister Collegii Augurum
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> > >
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79710 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2010-08-25
Subject: Re: Dissolution? [ was PRAETORIAL SCRIBAE]
Wouldn't it be easier for you to just resign instead of trying to get the
corporation dissolved?

Vale,

Sulla

On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 11:34 AM, rory12001 <rory12001@...> wrote:

>
>
> Maior Liviae spd;
> I'm beginning to think you are right amica, we could re-form enjoy our
> friends, the gods, Romanitas without all the toxic fighting.
>
> The membership of NR could vote for dissolution: I checked the statue
> below, we could even do it before a board resolution to show the Senate just
> what the silent majority think.
>
> http://www.mainelegislature.org/legis/statutes/13-b/title13-Bsec1101.html
>
> >
> > Livia Hortensiae sal.
> >
> > Apparently it's too much. Now even people I considered as friends have
> > joined the mobbing action against you.
> >
> > I'm starting to think we should all leave Nova Roma, and leave it in the
> > hands of Cato, Sulla, Octavius, etc., which is obviously the aim they are
>
> > trying to reach. But after they got what they want they would only have
> each
> > other to hurl insults at.
> >
> > Optime vale,
> > Livia
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "rory12001" <rory12001@>
> > To: <Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com <Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com>>
> > Sent: Wednesday, August 25, 2010 6:12 AM
> > Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Report of the August session of the Collegium
> > Pontificum PRAETORIAL SCRIBAE
> >
> >
> > M. Hortensia Scribae spd;
> >
> > is it asking too much to be able to post without this incessant barrage
> > of insults? It isn't funny it creates an ML where others fear to post;
> for
> > fear next time it will be THEM.,,,
> >
> > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com <Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com>,
> "petronius_dexter" <jfarnoud94@> wrote:
> > >
> > > Ave Sulla,
> > >
> > > It seems to me that many stories by Stephen King have the Maine as
> > > theater...
> > >
> > > So perhaps that explains this Maior's mind capture...
> > >
> > > Vale.
> > >
> > > C. Petronius Dexter
> > > Arcoiali scribebat
> > > a. d. VIII Kalendas Septembres P. Memmio K. Fabio II coss.
> > >
> > >
> > > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com <Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com>, Robert
> Woolwine <robert.woolwine@>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > *Whack*
> > > >
> > > > *WHACK*
> > > >
> > > > Misery, gotta love how Stephen King has captured the essence of
> Maior.
> > > >
> > > > Vale,
> > > >
> > > > Sulla
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 2:12 PM, rory12001 <rory12001@> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > M. Hortensia Piscino Quiritibus spd;
> > > > >
> > > > > Piscine; my friend from Hibernia, Lupus, wrote to me about Nova
> Roma
> > > > > "I
> > > > > can't believe how bad it's got"....
> > > > >
> > > > > I won't participate in the endless online name-calling, arguing
> > > > > etc...It's
> > > > > a waste, Nova Roma's ML is dominated by a samll group of
> destructive
> > > > > people
> > > > > who have no desire to make or do anything positive on behalf of the
>
> > > > > Religio
> > > > > Romana or living Roman culture.
> > > > >
> > > > > di me favet
> > > > > M. Hortensia Maior
> > > > >
> > > > > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com <Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com><Nova-Roma%
> 40yahoogroups.com>,
> > > > > "marcushoratius" <MHoratius@> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Salve Cato
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com <Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com><Nova-Roma%
> 40yahoogroups.com>,
> > > > > > "Cato"
> > > > > <catoinnyc@> wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Cato Maiori sal.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com <Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com><Nova-Roma%
> 40yahoogroups.com>,
> > > > > "rory12001" <rory12001@> wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Salve Palladi;
> > > > > > > > all the cultores including me & the majority of the CP have
> the
> > > > > highest regard for M. Moravius Piscinus
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > CATO: another lie, and one that is on its face
> self-contradictory.
> > > > > > > I
> > > > > can name at least five cultores - including at least two pontiffs,
> > > > > both
> > > > > cultores - who do NOT hold Piscinus in any kind of regard at all
> and
> > > > > who, in
> > > > > fact, hold him responsible for the very worst damage done to the
> > > > > Respublica
> > > > > over the past three or four years.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > PISCINUS: You may want to reread this, and apologize for calling
> > > > > Hortensia a liar. She said "the majority of the CP." Two out of how
>
> > > > > many
> > > > > cultores who are in the Collegium Pontificum? Can't please
> everyone.
> > > > > And
> > > > > cultores would not agree with you that Pontifex Q. Fabius Maximus
> is a
> > > > > cultor Deorum at all when he advocates temple prostitution. What he
> > > > > practices and advocates is some Hollywood perversion of the religio
>
> > > > > Romana.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > And, yes, you do write a lot, but apparently you are a very poor
> > > > > > reader,
> > > > > for you find words that aren't written and miscomprehend those that
>
> > > > > are.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Vale
> > > > > >
> > > > > > M. Moravius Piscinus
> > > > > > Pontifex Maximus
> > > > > > Magister Collegii Augurum
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
>
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79711 From: luciaiuliaaquila Date: 2010-08-25
Subject: Re: INVITATION CONVENTVS NOVAE ROMAE NORTH AMERICA
Ave Statia Aeternia!

Very important questions!

The status on garb is that we should all wear some:)

It would be great for all of us to be able to dress in Roman clothing and my personal goal it to at least sell my wares wearing a tunica or khiton. We shall see, time may not be on my side.

Currently we are coordinating with Scholastica to do a presentation on ancient clothing but she can tell you how to make a tunica or khiton etc.(they are easy, even stitched by hand) I am opting for a khiton, I hope. Rota's wife makes wonderful Roman clothing but I am not sure she will have time to do anything before the conventus - however she might could get your measurements and make something for you, but I am not sure - I will ask her.
If you would like to volunteer to check about the internet and maybe help get a Roman clothing vendor to come that will earn you "Rota bucks".
We will have a display of shield and sword and of course we have some folks from various legios. I will be bringing a couple of "personal" weapons myself. I have a few replicas as well that are not the best but I am bringing them - the best will be brought by Rota and other legionairres.
As for curvesque figures - I am thankful for Roman clothing! LaWren's nest finally has put up some new clothing and has some for we more voluptuous types. http://www.lawrensnest.com/roman.html
If you come I do hope you plan to take advantage of the open forum and read an appropriate poem or two:)

Vale,

Julia

<syrenslullaby@...> wrote:
>
> Statia Aeternia Iuliae Aquilae sal:
>
>
> Wow this looks like you all will have a blast for sure! What's the status
> on garb? Will you have vendors there who specialize in Roman Clothing and
> Weaponry? Actually the most important question, will there be vendors who
> specialize in Roman Clothing that cater those of the curvesque nature??
>
> Important Questions :-)
>
> Vale Optime,
> Statia Aeternia

>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79712 From: luciaiuliaaquila Date: 2010-08-25
Subject: Re: INVITATION CONVENTVS NOVAE ROMAE NORTH AMERICA
Ave Petroni!

That is such good news! I hope the passport issue will get worked out, I will sacrifice to Mercurius!

Vale bene,

Julia

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "petronius_dexter" <jfarnoud94@...> wrote:
>
> C. Petronius L. Juliae et omnibus s.p.d.,
>
> > All are Invited to Attend the
> > II CONVENTVS NOVAE ROMAE NORTH AMERICA
>
> I promiss that I will do all I can to be with you all at this Conventus.
>
> Unfortunately my passport was valid untill 2002. I did not need to update it because of the Sheingen Zone and licence to travel within Europe Union only with my French Identity card.
>
> But it is more difficult now to me to go in US that it was for La Fayette.
>
> I have to update my passport and obtain Visa. I will begin the procees to obtain these papers since tomorrow Thursday August 25th, hoping that I will obtain all those papers for October 8th in order to be with you all at this North America Conventus.
>
> Optime valete.
>
> C. Petronius Dexter
> Arcoiali scribebat
> a. d. VIII Kalendas Septembres P. Memmio K. Fabio II coss.
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79713 From: luciaiuliaaquila Date: 2010-08-25
Subject: Re: INVITATION CONVENTVS NOVAE ROMAE NORTH AMERICA
Ave Ocella!

You will be missed! I truly looked forward to meeting you - there will be other opportunities, and you can always come to Nashville to see the Parthenon and other hidden little items of classic interest to be discovered in this town; next year we are pushing for a series on the Aeneid through the conservancy.

Frequency? Ideally a European and a North American Conventus is planned each year and provincia conventus occasionally are planned as well.

Next year maybe you will have more time to participate in the various cohors and you can help out:)

Vale optime,

Julia

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Gnaea Livia Ocella" <lbciddio@...> wrote:
>
> Cn. Livia Ocella L. Iuliae Aquilae omnibus SPD,
>
> This sounds like a wonderful event! Unfortunately I cannot attend for a couple of reasons (busy time of the school year, as well as it being Canadian Thanksgiving weekend), but how frequent are events like this held? I would love to attend a conventus in future if possible, but I worry that I am passing up a rare chance in this case.
>
> Optime vale et valete,
> Ocella
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79714 From: rory12001 Date: 2010-08-25
Subject: Re: DISSOLUTION? [ was PRAETORIAL SCRIBAE]
Salvete;
there is 20K of the cives money that is hoarded and never spent by the Board of Directors.

I find this situation unethical as our nonprofit promises to advance Roman culture and religio. It doesn't.

I think the time has come for everyone to vote on what they think of Nova Roma. And let the cives tell the Board what it wants. They exist to serve the membership not the other way around.

http://www.mainelegislature.org/legis/statutes/13-b/title13-Bch11sec0.html
vale
M.Hortensia Maior


>
> Wouldn't it be easier for you to just resign instead of trying to get the
> corporation dissolved?
>
> Vale,
>
> Sulla
>
> On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 11:34 AM, rory12001 <rory12001@...> wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > Maior Liviae spd;
> > I'm beginning to think you are right amica, we could re-form enjoy our
> > friends, the gods, Romanitas without all the toxic fighting.
> >
> > The membership of NR could vote for dissolution: I checked the statue
> > below, we could even do it before a board resolution to show the Senate just
> > what the silent majority think.
> >
> > http://www.mainelegislature.org/legis/statutes/13-b/title13-Bsec1101.html
> >
> > >
> > > Livia Hortensiae sal.
> > >
> > > Apparently it's too much. Now even people I considered as friends have
> > > joined the mobbing action against you.
> > >
> > > I'm starting to think we should all leave Nova Roma, and leave it in the
> > > hands of Cato, Sulla, Octavius, etc., which is obviously the aim they are
> >
> > > trying to reach. But after they got what they want they would only have
> > each
> > > other to hurl insults at.
> > >
> > > Optime vale,
> > > Livia
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "rory12001" <rory12001@>
> > > To: <Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com <Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com>>
> > > Sent: Wednesday, August 25, 2010 6:12 AM
> > > Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Report of the August session of the Collegium
> > > Pontificum PRAETORIAL SCRIBAE
> > >
> > >
> > > M. Hortensia Scribae spd;
> > >
> > > is it asking too much to be able to post without this incessant barrage
> > > of insults? It isn't funny it creates an ML where others fear to post;
> > for
> > > fear next time it will be THEM.,,,
> > >
> > > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com <Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com>,
> > "petronius_dexter" <jfarnoud94@> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Ave Sulla,
> > > >
> > > > It seems to me that many stories by Stephen King have the Maine as
> > > > theater...
> > > >
> > > > So perhaps that explains this Maior's mind capture...
> > > >
> > > > Vale.
> > > >
> > > > C. Petronius Dexter
> > > > Arcoiali scribebat
> > > > a. d. VIII Kalendas Septembres P. Memmio K. Fabio II coss.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com <Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com>, Robert
> > Woolwine <robert.woolwine@>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > *Whack*
> > > > >
> > > > > *WHACK*
> > > > >
> > > > > Misery, gotta love how Stephen King has captured the essence of
> > Maior.
> > > > >
> > > > > Vale,
> > > > >
> > > > > Sulla
> > > > >
> > > > > On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 2:12 PM, rory12001 <rory12001@> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > M. Hortensia Piscino Quiritibus spd;
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Piscine; my friend from Hibernia, Lupus, wrote to me about Nova
> > Roma
> > > > > > "I
> > > > > > can't believe how bad it's got"....
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I won't participate in the endless online name-calling, arguing
> > > > > > etc...It's
> > > > > > a waste, Nova Roma's ML is dominated by a samll group of
> > destructive
> > > > > > people
> > > > > > who have no desire to make or do anything positive on behalf of the
> >
> > > > > > Religio
> > > > > > Romana or living Roman culture.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > di me favet
> > > > > > M. Hortensia Maior
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com <Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com><Nova-Roma%
> > 40yahoogroups.com>,
> > > > > > "marcushoratius" <MHoratius@> wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Salve Cato
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com <Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com><Nova-Roma%
> > 40yahoogroups.com>,
> > > > > > > "Cato"
> > > > > > <catoinnyc@> wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Cato Maiori sal.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com <Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com><Nova-Roma%
> > 40yahoogroups.com>,
> > > > > > "rory12001" <rory12001@> wrote:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Salve Palladi;
> > > > > > > > > all the cultores including me & the majority of the CP have
> > the
> > > > > > highest regard for M. Moravius Piscinus
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > CATO: another lie, and one that is on its face
> > self-contradictory.
> > > > > > > > I
> > > > > > can name at least five cultores - including at least two pontiffs,
> > > > > > both
> > > > > > cultores - who do NOT hold Piscinus in any kind of regard at all
> > and
> > > > > > who, in
> > > > > > fact, hold him responsible for the very worst damage done to the
> > > > > > Respublica
> > > > > > over the past three or four years.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > PISCINUS: You may want to reread this, and apologize for calling
> > > > > > Hortensia a liar. She said "the majority of the CP." Two out of how
> >
> > > > > > many
> > > > > > cultores who are in the Collegium Pontificum? Can't please
> > everyone.
> > > > > > And
> > > > > > cultores would not agree with you that Pontifex Q. Fabius Maximus
> > is a
> > > > > > cultor Deorum at all when he advocates temple prostitution. What he
> > > > > > practices and advocates is some Hollywood perversion of the religio
> >
> > > > > > Romana.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > And, yes, you do write a lot, but apparently you are a very poor
> > > > > > > reader,
> > > > > > for you find words that aren't written and miscomprehend those that
> >
> > > > > > are.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Vale
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > M. Moravius Piscinus
> > > > > > > Pontifex Maximus
> > > > > > > Magister Collegii Augurum
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79715 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2010-08-25
Subject: Re: DISSOLUTION? [ was PRAETORIAL SCRIBAE]
I think this is because your coup attempt failed. Nothing more and nothing
less. You did not get your way. Maine law stood in your way.

Vale,

Sulla

On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 12:08 PM, rory12001 <rory12001@...> wrote:

>
>
> Salvete;
> there is 20K of the cives money that is hoarded and never spent by the
> Board of Directors.
>
> I find this situation unethical as our nonprofit promises to advance Roman
> culture and religio. It doesn't.
>
> I think the time has come for everyone to vote on what they think of Nova
> Roma. And let the cives tell the Board what it wants. They exist to serve
> the membership not the other way around.
>
> http://www.mainelegislature.org/legis/statutes/13-b/title13-Bch11sec0.html
> vale
> M.Hortensia Maior
>
> >
> > Wouldn't it be easier for you to just resign instead of trying to get the
> > corporation dissolved?
> >
> > Vale,
> >
> > Sulla
> >
> > On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 11:34 AM, rory12001 <rory12001@...> wrote:
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > Maior Liviae spd;
> > > I'm beginning to think you are right amica, we could re-form enjoy our
> > > friends, the gods, Romanitas without all the toxic fighting.
> > >
> > > The membership of NR could vote for dissolution: I checked the statue
> > > below, we could even do it before a board resolution to show the Senate
> just
> > > what the silent majority think.
> > >
> > >
> http://www.mainelegislature.org/legis/statutes/13-b/title13-Bsec1101.html
> > >
> > > >
> > > > Livia Hortensiae sal.
> > > >
> > > > Apparently it's too much. Now even people I considered as friends
> have
> > > > joined the mobbing action against you.
> > > >
> > > > I'm starting to think we should all leave Nova Roma, and leave it in
> the
> > > > hands of Cato, Sulla, Octavius, etc., which is obviously the aim they
> are
> > >
> > > > trying to reach. But after they got what they want they would only
> have
> > > each
> > > > other to hurl insults at.
> > > >
> > > > Optime vale,
> > > > Livia
> > > >
> > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > From: "rory12001" <rory12001@>
> > > > To: <Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com <Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com><Nova-Roma%
> 40yahoogroups.com>>
> > > > Sent: Wednesday, August 25, 2010 6:12 AM
> > > > Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Report of the August session of the
> Collegium
> > > > Pontificum PRAETORIAL SCRIBAE
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > M. Hortensia Scribae spd;
> > > >
> > > > is it asking too much to be able to post without this incessant
> barrage
> > > > of insults? It isn't funny it creates an ML where others fear to
> post;
> > > for
> > > > fear next time it will be THEM.,,,
> > > >
> > > > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com <Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com><Nova-Roma%
> 40yahoogroups.com>,
> > > "petronius_dexter" <jfarnoud94@> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Ave Sulla,
> > > > >
> > > > > It seems to me that many stories by Stephen King have the Maine as
> > > > > theater...
> > > > >
> > > > > So perhaps that explains this Maior's mind capture...
> > > > >
> > > > > Vale.
> > > > >
> > > > > C. Petronius Dexter
> > > > > Arcoiali scribebat
> > > > > a. d. VIII Kalendas Septembres P. Memmio K. Fabio II coss.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com <Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com><Nova-Roma%
> 40yahoogroups.com>, Robert
> > > Woolwine <robert.woolwine@>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > *Whack*
> > > > > >
> > > > > > *WHACK*
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Misery, gotta love how Stephen King has captured the essence of
> > > Maior.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Vale,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Sulla
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 2:12 PM, rory12001 <rory12001@> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > M. Hortensia Piscino Quiritibus spd;
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Piscine; my friend from Hibernia, Lupus, wrote to me about Nova
> > > Roma
> > > > > > > "I
> > > > > > > can't believe how bad it's got"....
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I won't participate in the endless online name-calling, arguing
> > > > > > > etc...It's
> > > > > > > a waste, Nova Roma's ML is dominated by a samll group of
> > > destructive
> > > > > > > people
> > > > > > > who have no desire to make or do anything positive on behalf of
> the
> > >
> > > > > > > Religio
> > > > > > > Romana or living Roman culture.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > di me favet
> > > > > > > M. Hortensia Maior
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com <Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com><Nova-Roma%
> 40yahoogroups.com><Nova-Roma%
> > > 40yahoogroups.com>,
> > > > > > > "marcushoratius" <MHoratius@> wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Salve Cato
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com<Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com><Nova-Roma%
> 40yahoogroups.com><Nova-Roma%
> > > 40yahoogroups.com>,
> > > > > > > > "Cato"
> > > > > > > <catoinnyc@> wrote:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Cato Maiori sal.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com<Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com><Nova-Roma%
> 40yahoogroups.com><Nova-Roma%
> > > 40yahoogroups.com>,
> > > > > > > "rory12001" <rory12001@> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Salve Palladi;
> > > > > > > > > > all the cultores including me & the majority of the CP
> have
> > > the
> > > > > > > highest regard for M. Moravius Piscinus
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > CATO: another lie, and one that is on its face
> > > self-contradictory.
> > > > > > > > > I
> > > > > > > can name at least five cultores - including at least two
> pontiffs,
> > > > > > > both
> > > > > > > cultores - who do NOT hold Piscinus in any kind of regard at
> all
> > > and
> > > > > > > who, in
> > > > > > > fact, hold him responsible for the very worst damage done to
> the
> > > > > > > Respublica
> > > > > > > over the past three or four years.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > PISCINUS: You may want to reread this, and apologize for
> calling
> > > > > > > Hortensia a liar. She said "the majority of the CP." Two out of
> how
> > >
> > > > > > > many
> > > > > > > cultores who are in the Collegium Pontificum? Can't please
> > > everyone.
> > > > > > > And
> > > > > > > cultores would not agree with you that Pontifex Q. Fabius
> Maximus
> > > is a
> > > > > > > cultor Deorum at all when he advocates temple prostitution.
> What he
> > > > > > > practices and advocates is some Hollywood perversion of the
> religio
> > >
> > > > > > > Romana.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > And, yes, you do write a lot, but apparently you are a very
> poor
> > > > > > > > reader,
> > > > > > > for you find words that aren't written and miscomprehend those
> that
> > >
> > > > > > > are.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Vale
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > M. Moravius Piscinus
> > > > > > > > Pontifex Maximus
> > > > > > > > Magister Collegii Augurum
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
>
>
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79716 From: Gnaea Livia Ocella Date: 2010-08-25
Subject: Re: Dissolution? [ was PRAETORIAL SCRIBAE]
Cn. Livia Ocella M. Hortensiae Maiori S.P.D.,

Forgive my popping into this conversation, but, hypothetically, would the forming of another group similar to Nova Roma actually legally require the dissolution of Nova Roma (as it is now) itself?

Since you bring up the possibility of a vote for dissolution, regardless of how likely or unlikely that is I would like to understand as much as possible about the situation.

Optime vale,
Livia Ocella

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "rory12001" <rory12001@...> wrote:
>
> Maior Liviae spd;
> I'm beginning to think you are right amica, we could re-form enjoy our friends, the gods, Romanitas without all the toxic fighting.
>
> The membership of NR could vote for dissolution: I checked the statue below, we could even do it before a board resolution to show the Senate just what the silent majority think.
>
> http://www.mainelegislature.org/legis/statutes/13-b/title13-Bsec1101.html
>
> >
> > Livia Hortensiae sal.
> >
> > Apparently it's too much. Now even people I considered as friends have
> > joined the mobbing action against you.
> >
> > I'm starting to think we should all leave Nova Roma, and leave it in the
> > hands of Cato, Sulla, Octavius, etc., which is obviously the aim they are
> > trying to reach. But after they got what they want they would only have each
> > other to hurl insults at.
> >
> > Optime vale,
> > Livia
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "rory12001" <rory12001@>
> > To: <Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com>
> > Sent: Wednesday, August 25, 2010 6:12 AM
> > Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Report of the August session of the Collegium
> > Pontificum PRAETORIAL SCRIBAE
> >
> >
> > M. Hortensia Scribae spd;
> >
> > is it asking too much to be able to post without this incessant barrage
> > of insults? It isn't funny it creates an ML where others fear to post; for
> > fear next time it will be THEM.,,,
> >
> > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "petronius_dexter" <jfarnoud94@> wrote:
> > >
> > > Ave Sulla,
> > >
> > > It seems to me that many stories by Stephen King have the Maine as
> > > theater...
> > >
> > > So perhaps that explains this Maior's mind capture...
> > >
> > > Vale.
> > >
> > > C. Petronius Dexter
> > > Arcoiali scribebat
> > > a. d. VIII Kalendas Septembres P. Memmio K. Fabio II coss.
> > >
> > >
> > > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Robert Woolwine <robert.woolwine@>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > *Whack*
> > > >
> > > > *WHACK*
> > > >
> > > > Misery, gotta love how Stephen King has captured the essence of Maior.
> > > >
> > > > Vale,
> > > >
> > > > Sulla
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 2:12 PM, rory12001 <rory12001@> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > M. Hortensia Piscino Quiritibus spd;
> > > > >
> > > > > Piscine; my friend from Hibernia, Lupus, wrote to me about Nova Roma
> > > > > "I
> > > > > can't believe how bad it's got"....
> > > > >
> > > > > I won't participate in the endless online name-calling, arguing
> > > > > etc...It's
> > > > > a waste, Nova Roma's ML is dominated by a samll group of destructive
> > > > > people
> > > > > who have no desire to make or do anything positive on behalf of the
> > > > > Religio
> > > > > Romana or living Roman culture.
> > > > >
> > > > > di me favet
> > > > > M. Hortensia Maior
> > > > >
> > > > > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com <Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com>,
> > > > > "marcushoratius" <MHoratius@> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Salve Cato
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com <Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com>,
> > > > > > "Cato"
> > > > > <catoinnyc@> wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Cato Maiori sal.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com <Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com>,
> > > > > "rory12001" <rory12001@> wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Salve Palladi;
> > > > > > > > all the cultores including me & the majority of the CP have the
> > > > > highest regard for M. Moravius Piscinus
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > CATO: another lie, and one that is on its face self-contradictory.
> > > > > > > I
> > > > > can name at least five cultores - including at least two pontiffs,
> > > > > both
> > > > > cultores - who do NOT hold Piscinus in any kind of regard at all and
> > > > > who, in
> > > > > fact, hold him responsible for the very worst damage done to the
> > > > > Respublica
> > > > > over the past three or four years.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > PISCINUS: You may want to reread this, and apologize for calling
> > > > > Hortensia a liar. She said "the majority of the CP." Two out of how
> > > > > many
> > > > > cultores who are in the Collegium Pontificum? Can't please everyone.
> > > > > And
> > > > > cultores would not agree with you that Pontifex Q. Fabius Maximus is a
> > > > > cultor Deorum at all when he advocates temple prostitution. What he
> > > > > practices and advocates is some Hollywood perversion of the religio
> > > > > Romana.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > And, yes, you do write a lot, but apparently you are a very poor
> > > > > > reader,
> > > > > for you find words that aren't written and miscomprehend those that
> > > > > are.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Vale
> > > > > >
> > > > > > M. Moravius Piscinus
> > > > > > Pontifex Maximus
> > > > > > Magister Collegii Augurum
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79717 From: rory12001 Date: 2010-08-25
Subject: Re: Dissolution? [ was PRAETORIAL SCRIBAE]
M. Hortensia Cn. Liviae spd;

no problem, I'm happy to discuss this with you. Any Roman association can form whether in Europe or the U.S. without NR dissolving.

I'm concerned as I'm a member of the Board of directors of Nova Roma Corp, a registered 501(c)(3) nonprofit and we seem to do nothing but fight; not benefit our members. We take their money and do zero.

That's why I want to put it to all the members: hear what they want.
vale
Maior

>
> Cn. Livia Ocella M. Hortensiae Maiori S.P.D.,
>
> Forgive my popping into this conversation, but, hypothetically, would the forming of another group similar to Nova Roma actually legally require the dissolution of Nova Roma (as it is now) itself?
>
> Since you bring up the possibility of a vote for dissolution, regardless of how likely or unlikely that is I would like to understand as much as possible about the situation.
>
> Optime vale,
> Livia Ocella
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "rory12001" <rory12001@> wrote:
> >
> > Maior Liviae spd;
> > I'm beginning to think you are right amica, we could re-form enjoy our friends, the gods, Romanitas without all the toxic fighting.
> >
> > The membership of NR could vote for dissolution: I checked the statue below, we could even do it before a board resolution to show the Senate just what the silent majority think.
> >
> > http://www.mainelegislature.org/legis/statutes/13-b/title13-Bsec1101.html
> >
> > >
> > > Livia Hortensiae sal.
> > >
> > > Apparently it's too much. Now even people I considered as friends have
> > > joined the mobbing action against you.
> > >
> > > I'm starting to think we should all leave Nova Roma, and leave it in the
> > > hands of Cato, Sulla, Octavius, etc., which is obviously the aim they are
> > > trying to reach. But after they got what they want they would only have each
> > > other to hurl insults at.
> > >
> > > Optime vale,
> > > Livia
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "rory12001" <rory12001@>
> > > To: <Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com>
> > > Sent: Wednesday, August 25, 2010 6:12 AM
> > > Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Report of the August session of the Collegium
> > > Pontificum PRAETORIAL SCRIBAE
> > >
> > >
> > > M. Hortensia Scribae spd;
> > >
> > > is it asking too much to be able to post without this incessant barrage
> > > of insults? It isn't funny it creates an ML where others fear to post; for
> > > fear next time it will be THEM.,,,
> > >
> > > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "petronius_dexter" <jfarnoud94@> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Ave Sulla,
> > > >
> > > > It seems to me that many stories by Stephen King have the Maine as
> > > > theater...
> > > >
> > > > So perhaps that explains this Maior's mind capture...
> > > >
> > > > Vale.
> > > >
> > > > C. Petronius Dexter
> > > > Arcoiali scribebat
> > > > a. d. VIII Kalendas Septembres P. Memmio K. Fabio II coss.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Robert Woolwine <robert.woolwine@>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > *Whack*
> > > > >
> > > > > *WHACK*
> > > > >
> > > > > Misery, gotta love how Stephen King has captured the essence of Maior.
> > > > >
> > > > > Vale,
> > > > >
> > > > > Sulla
> > > > >
> > > > > On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 2:12 PM, rory12001 <rory12001@> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > M. Hortensia Piscino Quiritibus spd;
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Piscine; my friend from Hibernia, Lupus, wrote to me about Nova Roma
> > > > > > "I
> > > > > > can't believe how bad it's got"....
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I won't participate in the endless online name-calling, arguing
> > > > > > etc...It's
> > > > > > a waste, Nova Roma's ML is dominated by a samll group of destructive
> > > > > > people
> > > > > > who have no desire to make or do anything positive on behalf of the
> > > > > > Religio
> > > > > > Romana or living Roman culture.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > di me favet
> > > > > > M. Hortensia Maior
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com <Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com>,
> > > > > > "marcushoratius" <MHoratius@> wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Salve Cato
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com <Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com>,
> > > > > > > "Cato"
> > > > > > <catoinnyc@> wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Cato Maiori sal.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com <Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com>,
> > > > > > "rory12001" <rory12001@> wrote:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Salve Palladi;
> > > > > > > > > all the cultores including me & the majority of the CP have the
> > > > > > highest regard for M. Moravius Piscinus
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > CATO: another lie, and one that is on its face self-contradictory.
> > > > > > > > I
> > > > > > can name at least five cultores - including at least two pontiffs,
> > > > > > both
> > > > > > cultores - who do NOT hold Piscinus in any kind of regard at all and
> > > > > > who, in
> > > > > > fact, hold him responsible for the very worst damage done to the
> > > > > > Respublica
> > > > > > over the past three or four years.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > PISCINUS: You may want to reread this, and apologize for calling
> > > > > > Hortensia a liar. She said "the majority of the CP." Two out of how
> > > > > > many
> > > > > > cultores who are in the Collegium Pontificum? Can't please everyone.
> > > > > > And
> > > > > > cultores would not agree with you that Pontifex Q. Fabius Maximus is a
> > > > > > cultor Deorum at all when he advocates temple prostitution. What he
> > > > > > practices and advocates is some Hollywood perversion of the religio
> > > > > > Romana.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > And, yes, you do write a lot, but apparently you are a very poor
> > > > > > > reader,
> > > > > > for you find words that aren't written and miscomprehend those that
> > > > > > are.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Vale
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > M. Moravius Piscinus
> > > > > > > Pontifex Maximus
> > > > > > > Magister Collegii Augurum
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79718 From: Belle Morte Statia Date: 2010-08-25
Subject: Re: Dissolution? [ was PRAETORIAL SCRIBAE]
Aeternia Liviae Ocellae M. Hortensiae Maiori S.P.D.

Forming another group similar to NR, would not mean NR dissolves... There
was a group formed some years ago, known as the SVR which had ex-citizens of
Nova Roma, actually founded by ex-NR members actually..

It all happened after this massive resignation on the Ides of March years
ago, many left including our now Pontifex Maximus Pro Tempore..

Apologies for jumping in as wel, this is me jumping back out.

Vale,
Aeternia

On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 11:50 AM, Gnaea Livia Ocella <lbciddio@...>wrote:

>
>
> Cn. Livia Ocella M. Hortensiae Maiori S.P.D.,
>
> Forgive my popping into this conversation, but, hypothetically, would the
> forming of another group similar to Nova Roma actually legally require the
> dissolution of Nova Roma (as it is now) itself?
>
> Since you bring up the possibility of a vote for dissolution, regardless of
> how likely or unlikely that is I would like to understand as much as
> possible about the situation.
>
> Optime vale,
> Livia Ocella
>
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com <Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com>,
> "rory12001" <rory12001@...> wrote:
> >
> > Maior Liviae spd;
> > I'm beginning to think you are right amica, we could re-form enjoy our
> friends, the gods, Romanitas without all the toxic fighting.
> >
> > The membership of NR could vote for dissolution: I checked the statue
> below, we could even do it before a board resolution to show the Senate just
> what the silent majority think.
> >
> >
> http://www.mainelegislature.org/legis/statutes/13-b/title13-Bsec1101.html
> >
> > >
> > > Livia Hortensiae sal.
> > >
> > > Apparently it's too much. Now even people I considered as friends have
> > > joined the mobbing action against you.
> > >
> > > I'm starting to think we should all leave Nova Roma, and leave it in
> the
> > > hands of Cato, Sulla, Octavius, etc., which is obviously the aim they
> are
> > > trying to reach. But after they got what they want they would only have
> each
> > > other to hurl insults at.
> > >
> > > Optime vale,
> > > Livia
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "rory12001" <rory12001@>
> > > To: <Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com <Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com>>
> > > Sent: Wednesday, August 25, 2010 6:12 AM
> > > Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Report of the August session of the Collegium
> > > Pontificum PRAETORIAL SCRIBAE
> > >
> > >
> > > M. Hortensia Scribae spd;
> > >
> > > is it asking too much to be able to post without this incessant barrage
>
> > > of insults? It isn't funny it creates an ML where others fear to post;
> for
> > > fear next time it will be THEM.,,,
> > >
> > > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com <Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com>,
> "petronius_dexter" <jfarnoud94@> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Ave Sulla,
> > > >
> > > > It seems to me that many stories by Stephen King have the Maine as
> > > > theater...
> > > >
> > > > So perhaps that explains this Maior's mind capture...
> > > >
> > > > Vale.
> > > >
> > > > C. Petronius Dexter
> > > > Arcoiali scribebat
> > > > a. d. VIII Kalendas Septembres P. Memmio K. Fabio II coss.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com <Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com>,
> Robert Woolwine <robert.woolwine@>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > *Whack*
> > > > >
> > > > > *WHACK*
> > > > >
> > > > > Misery, gotta love how Stephen King has captured the essence of
> Maior.
> > > > >
> > > > > Vale,
> > > > >
> > > > > Sulla
> > > > >
> > > > > On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 2:12 PM, rory12001 <rory12001@> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > M. Hortensia Piscino Quiritibus spd;
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Piscine; my friend from Hibernia, Lupus, wrote to me about Nova
> Roma
> > > > > > "I
> > > > > > can't believe how bad it's got"....
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I won't participate in the endless online name-calling, arguing
> > > > > > etc...It's
> > > > > > a waste, Nova Roma's ML is dominated by a samll group of
> destructive
> > > > > > people
> > > > > > who have no desire to make or do anything positive on behalf of
> the
> > > > > > Religio
> > > > > > Romana or living Roman culture.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > di me favet
> > > > > > M. Hortensia Maior
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com <Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com><Nova-Roma%
> 40yahoogroups.com>,
> > > > > > "marcushoratius" <MHoratius@> wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Salve Cato
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com <Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com><Nova-Roma%
> 40yahoogroups.com>,
> > > > > > > "Cato"
> > > > > > <catoinnyc@> wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Cato Maiori sal.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com<Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com><Nova-Roma%
> 40yahoogroups.com>,
> > > > > > "rory12001" <rory12001@> wrote:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Salve Palladi;
> > > > > > > > > all the cultores including me & the majority of the CP have
> the
> > > > > > highest regard for M. Moravius Piscinus
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > CATO: another lie, and one that is on its face
> self-contradictory.
> > > > > > > > I
> > > > > > can name at least five cultores - including at least two
> pontiffs,
> > > > > > both
> > > > > > cultores - who do NOT hold Piscinus in any kind of regard at all
> and
> > > > > > who, in
> > > > > > fact, hold him responsible for the very worst damage done to the
> > > > > > Respublica
> > > > > > over the past three or four years.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > PISCINUS: You may want to reread this, and apologize for
> calling
> > > > > > Hortensia a liar. She said "the majority of the CP." Two out of
> how
> > > > > > many
> > > > > > cultores who are in the Collegium Pontificum? Can't please
> everyone.
> > > > > > And
> > > > > > cultores would not agree with you that Pontifex Q. Fabius Maximus
> is a
> > > > > > cultor Deorum at all when he advocates temple prostitution. What
> he
> > > > > > practices and advocates is some Hollywood perversion of the
> religio
> > > > > > Romana.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > And, yes, you do write a lot, but apparently you are a very
> poor
> > > > > > > reader,
> > > > > > for you find words that aren't written and miscomprehend those
> that
> > > > > > are.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Vale
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > M. Moravius Piscinus
> > > > > > > Pontifex Maximus
> > > > > > > Magister Collegii Augurum
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
>
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79719 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2010-08-25
Subject: Re: Dissolution? [ was PRAETORIAL SCRIBAE]
Does that mean you are NOT going to the Conventus? Since you are trying to
advocate for a dissolution of NR?

On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 12:38 PM, rory12001 <rory12001@...> wrote:

>
>
> M. Hortensia Cn. Liviae spd;
>
> no problem, I'm happy to discuss this with you. Any Roman association can
> form whether in Europe or the U.S. without NR dissolving.
>
> I'm concerned as I'm a member of the Board of directors of Nova Roma Corp,
> a registered 501(c)(3) nonprofit and we seem to do nothing but fight; not
> benefit our members. We take their money and do zero.
>
> That's why I want to put it to all the members: hear what they want.
> vale
> Maior
>
>
> >
> > Cn. Livia Ocella M. Hortensiae Maiori S.P.D.,
> >
> > Forgive my popping into this conversation, but, hypothetically, would the
> forming of another group similar to Nova Roma actually legally require the
> dissolution of Nova Roma (as it is now) itself?
> >
> > Since you bring up the possibility of a vote for dissolution, regardless
> of how likely or unlikely that is I would like to understand as much as
> possible about the situation.
> >
> > Optime vale,
> > Livia Ocella
> >
> > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com <Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com>,
> "rory12001" <rory12001@> wrote:
> > >
> > > Maior Liviae spd;
> > > I'm beginning to think you are right amica, we could re-form enjoy our
> friends, the gods, Romanitas without all the toxic fighting.
> > >
> > > The membership of NR could vote for dissolution: I checked the statue
> below, we could even do it before a board resolution to show the Senate just
> what the silent majority think.
> > >
> > >
> http://www.mainelegislature.org/legis/statutes/13-b/title13-Bsec1101.html
> > >
> > > >
> > > > Livia Hortensiae sal.
> > > >
> > > > Apparently it's too much. Now even people I considered as friends
> have
> > > > joined the mobbing action against you.
> > > >
> > > > I'm starting to think we should all leave Nova Roma, and leave it in
> the
> > > > hands of Cato, Sulla, Octavius, etc., which is obviously the aim they
> are
> > > > trying to reach. But after they got what they want they would only
> have each
> > > > other to hurl insults at.
> > > >
> > > > Optime vale,
> > > > Livia
> > > >
> > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > From: "rory12001" <rory12001@>
> > > > To: <Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com <Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com>>
> > > > Sent: Wednesday, August 25, 2010 6:12 AM
> > > > Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Report of the August session of the
> Collegium
> > > > Pontificum PRAETORIAL SCRIBAE
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > M. Hortensia Scribae spd;
> > > >
> > > > is it asking too much to be able to post without this incessant
> barrage
> > > > of insults? It isn't funny it creates an ML where others fear to
> post; for
> > > > fear next time it will be THEM.,,,
> > > >
> > > > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com <Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com>,
> "petronius_dexter" <jfarnoud94@> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Ave Sulla,
> > > > >
> > > > > It seems to me that many stories by Stephen King have the Maine as
> > > > > theater...
> > > > >
> > > > > So perhaps that explains this Maior's mind capture...
> > > > >
> > > > > Vale.
> > > > >
> > > > > C. Petronius Dexter
> > > > > Arcoiali scribebat
> > > > > a. d. VIII Kalendas Septembres P. Memmio K. Fabio II coss.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com <Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com>,
> Robert Woolwine <robert.woolwine@>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > *Whack*
> > > > > >
> > > > > > *WHACK*
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Misery, gotta love how Stephen King has captured the essence of
> Maior.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Vale,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Sulla
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 2:12 PM, rory12001 <rory12001@> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > M. Hortensia Piscino Quiritibus spd;
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Piscine; my friend from Hibernia, Lupus, wrote to me about Nova
> Roma
> > > > > > > "I
> > > > > > > can't believe how bad it's got"....
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I won't participate in the endless online name-calling, arguing
>
> > > > > > > etc...It's
> > > > > > > a waste, Nova Roma's ML is dominated by a samll group of
> destructive
> > > > > > > people
> > > > > > > who have no desire to make or do anything positive on behalf of
> the
> > > > > > > Religio
> > > > > > > Romana or living Roman culture.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > di me favet
> > > > > > > M. Hortensia Maior
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com <Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com><Nova-Roma%
> 40yahoogroups.com>,
> > > > > > > "marcushoratius" <MHoratius@> wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Salve Cato
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com<Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com><Nova-Roma%
> 40yahoogroups.com>,
> > > > > > > > "Cato"
> > > > > > > <catoinnyc@> wrote:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Cato Maiori sal.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com<Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com><Nova-Roma%
> 40yahoogroups.com>,
> > > > > > > "rory12001" <rory12001@> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Salve Palladi;
> > > > > > > > > > all the cultores including me & the majority of the CP
> have the
> > > > > > > highest regard for M. Moravius Piscinus
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > CATO: another lie, and one that is on its face
> self-contradictory.
> > > > > > > > > I
> > > > > > > can name at least five cultores - including at least two
> pontiffs,
> > > > > > > both
> > > > > > > cultores - who do NOT hold Piscinus in any kind of regard at
> all and
> > > > > > > who, in
> > > > > > > fact, hold him responsible for the very worst damage done to
> the
> > > > > > > Respublica
> > > > > > > over the past three or four years.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > PISCINUS: You may want to reread this, and apologize for
> calling
> > > > > > > Hortensia a liar. She said "the majority of the CP." Two out of
> how
> > > > > > > many
> > > > > > > cultores who are in the Collegium Pontificum? Can't please
> everyone.
> > > > > > > And
> > > > > > > cultores would not agree with you that Pontifex Q. Fabius
> Maximus is a
> > > > > > > cultor Deorum at all when he advocates temple prostitution.
> What he
> > > > > > > practices and advocates is some Hollywood perversion of the
> religio
> > > > > > > Romana.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > And, yes, you do write a lot, but apparently you are a very
> poor
> > > > > > > > reader,
> > > > > > > for you find words that aren't written and miscomprehend those
> that
> > > > > > > are.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Vale
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > M. Moravius Piscinus
> > > > > > > > Pontifex Maximus
> > > > > > > > Magister Collegii Augurum
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
>
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79720 From: Gnaea Livia Ocella Date: 2010-08-25
Subject: Re: Dissolution? [ was PRAETORIAL SCRIBAE]
Cn. Livia Ocella M. Hortensiae Maiori S.P.D.,

Thank you for your answer.

Vale,
Ocella

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "rory12001" <rory12001@...> wrote:
>
> M. Hortensia Cn. Liviae spd;
>
> no problem, I'm happy to discuss this with you. Any Roman association can form whether in Europe or the U.S. without NR dissolving.
>
> I'm concerned as I'm a member of the Board of directors of Nova Roma Corp, a registered 501(c)(3) nonprofit and we seem to do nothing but fight; not benefit our members. We take their money and do zero.
>
> That's why I want to put it to all the members: hear what they want.
> vale
> Maior
>
> >
> > Cn. Livia Ocella M. Hortensiae Maiori S.P.D.,
> >
> > Forgive my popping into this conversation, but, hypothetically, would the forming of another group similar to Nova Roma actually legally require the dissolution of Nova Roma (as it is now) itself?
> >
> > Since you bring up the possibility of a vote for dissolution, regardless of how likely or unlikely that is I would like to understand as much as possible about the situation.
> >
> > Optime vale,
> > Livia Ocella
> >
> > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "rory12001" <rory12001@> wrote:
> > >
> > > Maior Liviae spd;
> > > I'm beginning to think you are right amica, we could re-form enjoy our friends, the gods, Romanitas without all the toxic fighting.
> > >
> > > The membership of NR could vote for dissolution: I checked the statue below, we could even do it before a board resolution to show the Senate just what the silent majority think.
> > >
> > > http://www.mainelegislature.org/legis/statutes/13-b/title13-Bsec1101.html
> > >
> > > >
> > > > Livia Hortensiae sal.
> > > >
> > > > Apparently it's too much. Now even people I considered as friends have
> > > > joined the mobbing action against you.
> > > >
> > > > I'm starting to think we should all leave Nova Roma, and leave it in the
> > > > hands of Cato, Sulla, Octavius, etc., which is obviously the aim they are
> > > > trying to reach. But after they got what they want they would only have each
> > > > other to hurl insults at.
> > > >
> > > > Optime vale,
> > > > Livia
> > > >
> > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > From: "rory12001" <rory12001@>
> > > > To: <Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com>
> > > > Sent: Wednesday, August 25, 2010 6:12 AM
> > > > Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Report of the August session of the Collegium
> > > > Pontificum PRAETORIAL SCRIBAE
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > M. Hortensia Scribae spd;
> > > >
> > > > is it asking too much to be able to post without this incessant barrage
> > > > of insults? It isn't funny it creates an ML where others fear to post; for
> > > > fear next time it will be THEM.,,,
> > > >
> > > > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "petronius_dexter" <jfarnoud94@> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Ave Sulla,
> > > > >
> > > > > It seems to me that many stories by Stephen King have the Maine as
> > > > > theater...
> > > > >
> > > > > So perhaps that explains this Maior's mind capture...
> > > > >
> > > > > Vale.
> > > > >
> > > > > C. Petronius Dexter
> > > > > Arcoiali scribebat
> > > > > a. d. VIII Kalendas Septembres P. Memmio K. Fabio II coss.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Robert Woolwine <robert.woolwine@>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > *Whack*
> > > > > >
> > > > > > *WHACK*
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Misery, gotta love how Stephen King has captured the essence of Maior.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Vale,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Sulla
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 2:12 PM, rory12001 <rory12001@> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > M. Hortensia Piscino Quiritibus spd;
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Piscine; my friend from Hibernia, Lupus, wrote to me about Nova Roma
> > > > > > > "I
> > > > > > > can't believe how bad it's got"....
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I won't participate in the endless online name-calling, arguing
> > > > > > > etc...It's
> > > > > > > a waste, Nova Roma's ML is dominated by a samll group of destructive
> > > > > > > people
> > > > > > > who have no desire to make or do anything positive on behalf of the
> > > > > > > Religio
> > > > > > > Romana or living Roman culture.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > di me favet
> > > > > > > M. Hortensia Maior
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com <Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com>,
> > > > > > > "marcushoratius" <MHoratius@> wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Salve Cato
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com <Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com>,
> > > > > > > > "Cato"
> > > > > > > <catoinnyc@> wrote:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Cato Maiori sal.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com <Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com>,
> > > > > > > "rory12001" <rory12001@> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Salve Palladi;
> > > > > > > > > > all the cultores including me & the majority of the CP have the
> > > > > > > highest regard for M. Moravius Piscinus
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > CATO: another lie, and one that is on its face self-contradictory.
> > > > > > > > > I
> > > > > > > can name at least five cultores - including at least two pontiffs,
> > > > > > > both
> > > > > > > cultores - who do NOT hold Piscinus in any kind of regard at all and
> > > > > > > who, in
> > > > > > > fact, hold him responsible for the very worst damage done to the
> > > > > > > Respublica
> > > > > > > over the past three or four years.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > PISCINUS: You may want to reread this, and apologize for calling
> > > > > > > Hortensia a liar. She said "the majority of the CP." Two out of how
> > > > > > > many
> > > > > > > cultores who are in the Collegium Pontificum? Can't please everyone.
> > > > > > > And
> > > > > > > cultores would not agree with you that Pontifex Q. Fabius Maximus is a
> > > > > > > cultor Deorum at all when he advocates temple prostitution. What he
> > > > > > > practices and advocates is some Hollywood perversion of the religio
> > > > > > > Romana.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > And, yes, you do write a lot, but apparently you are a very poor
> > > > > > > > reader,
> > > > > > > for you find words that aren't written and miscomprehend those that
> > > > > > > are.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Vale
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > M. Moravius Piscinus
> > > > > > > > Pontifex Maximus
> > > > > > > > Magister Collegii Augurum
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79721 From: QFabiusMaxmi@aol.com Date: 2010-08-25
Subject: Re: DISSOLUTION?
there is 20K of the cives money that is hoarded and never spent by the Board of Directors.





Of course its not spent, Senator. We need to buy 108 acres of land, probably on an island, and we need to pay construction costs for our buildings. If that's called hording, so be it. I call it financial management.
As for the calls of dissolution. let's face it. Without the corporation and the Constitution, NR would have ceased to exist a long time ago. That money is not your bank account, Senator. I pay my dues for the reason which I started the dues concept under my and Minucius’ Consulship. To acquire and maintain our stated goal of land.

Q. Fabius Maximus



-----Original Message-----
From: rory12001 <rory12001@...>
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wed, Aug 25, 2010 12:08 pm
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: DISSOLUTION? [ was PRAETORIAL SCRIBAE]




Salvete;
there is 20K of the cives money that is hoarded and never spent by the Board of Directors.

I find this situation unethical as our nonprofit promises to advance Roman culture and religio. It doesn't.

I think the time has come for everyone to vote on what they think of Nova Roma. And let the cives tell the Board what it wants. They exist to serve the membership not the other way around.

http://www.mainelegislature.org/legis/statutes/13-b/title13-Bch11sec0.html
vale
M.Hortensia Maior

>
> Wouldn't it be easier for you to just resign instead of trying to get the
> corporation dissolved?
>
> Vale,
>
> Sulla
>
> On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 11:34 AM, rory12001 <rory12001@...> wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > Maior Liviae spd;
> > I'm beginning to think you are right amica, we could re-form enjoy our
> > friends, the gods, Romanitas without all the toxic fighting.
> >
> > The membership of NR could vote for dissolution: I checked the statue
> > below, we could even do it before a board resolution to show the Senate just
> > what the silent majority think.
> >
> > http://www.mainelegislature.org/legis/statutes/13-b/title13-Bsec1101.html
> >
> > >
> > > Livia Hortensiae sal.
> > >
> > > Apparently it's too much. Now even people I considered as friends have
> > > joined the mobbing action against you.
> > >
> > > I'm starting to think we should all leave Nova Roma, and leave it in the
> > > hands of Cato, Sulla, Octavius, etc., which is obviously the aim they are
> >
> > > trying to reach. But after they got what they want they would only have
> > each
> > > other to hurl insults at.
> > >
> > > Optime vale,
> > > Livia
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "rory12001" <rory12001@>
> > > To: <Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com <Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com>>
> > > Sent: Wednesday, August 25, 2010 6:12 AM
> > > Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Report of the August session of the Collegium
> > > Pontificum PRAETORIAL SCRIBAE
> > >
> > >
> > > M. Hortensia Scribae spd;
> > >
> > > is it asking too much to be able to post without this incessant barrage
> > > of insults? It isn't funny it creates an ML where others fear to post;
> > for
> > > fear next time it will be THEM.,,,
> > >
> > > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com <Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com>,
> > "petronius_dexter" <jfarnoud94@> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Ave Sulla,
> > > >
> > > > It seems to me that many stories by Stephen King have the Maine as
> > > > theater...
> > > >
> > > > So perhaps that explains this Maior's mind capture...
> > > >
> > > > Vale.
> > > >
> > > > C. Petronius Dexter
> > > > Arcoiali scribebat
> > > > a. d. VIII Kalendas Septembres P. Memmio K. Fabio II coss.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com <Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com>, Robert
> > Woolwine <robert.woolwine@>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > *Whack*
> > > > >
> > > > > *WHACK*
> > > > >
> > > > > Misery, gotta love how Stephen King has captured the essence of
> > Maior.
> > > > >
> > > > > Vale,
> > > > >
> > > > > Sulla
> > > > >
> > > > > On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 2:12 PM, rory12001 <rory12001@> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > M. Hortensia Piscino Quiritibus spd;
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Piscine; my friend from Hibernia, Lupus, wrote to me about Nova
> > Roma
> > > > > > "I
> > > > > > can't believe how bad it's got"....
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I won't participate in the endless online name-calling, arguing
> > > > > > etc...It's
> > > > > > a waste, Nova Roma's ML is dominated by a samll group of
> > destructive
> > > > > > people
> > > > > > who have no desire to make or do anything positive on behalf of the
> >
> > > > > > Religio
> > > > > > Romana or living Roman culture.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > di me favet
> > > > > > M. Hortensia Maior
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com <Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com><Nova-Roma%
> > 40yahoogroups.com>,
> > > > > > "marcushoratius" <MHoratius@> wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Salve Cato
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com <Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com><Nova-Roma%
> > 40yahoogroups.com>,
> > > > > > > "Cato"
> > > > > > <catoinnyc@> wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Cato Maiori sal.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com <Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com><Nova-Roma%
> > 40yahoogroups.com>,
> > > > > > "rory12001" <rory12001@> wrote:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Salve Palladi;
> > > > > > > > > all the cultores including me & the majority of the CP have
> > the
> > > > > > highest regard for M. Moravius Piscinus
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > CATO: another lie, and one that is on its face
> > self-contradictory.
> > > > > > > > I
> > > > > > can name at least five cultores - including at least two pontiffs,
> > > > > > both
> > > > > > cultores - who do NOT hold Piscinus in any kind of regard at all
> > and
> > > > > > who, in
> > > > > > fact, hold him responsible for the very worst damage done to the
> > > > > > Respublica
> > > > > > over the past three or four years.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > PISCINUS: You may want to reread this, and apologize for calling
> > > > > > Hortensia a liar. She said "the majority of the CP." Two out of how
> >
> > > > > > many
> > > > > > cultores who are in the Collegium Pontificum? Can't please
> > everyone.
> > > > > > And
> > > > > > cultores would not agree with you that Pontifex Q. Fabius Maximus
> > is a
> > > > > > cultor Deorum at all when he advocates temple prostitution. What he
> > > > > > practices and advocates is some Hollywood perversion of the religio
> >
> > > > > > Romana.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > And, yes, you do write a lot, but apparently you are a very poor
> > > > > > > reader,
> > > > > > for you find words that aren't written and miscomprehend those that
> >
> > > > > > are.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Vale
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > M. Moravius Piscinus
> > > > > > > Pontifex Maximus
> > > > > > > Magister Collegii Augurum
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>







[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79722 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2010-08-25
Subject: Re: INVITATION CONVENTVS NOVAE ROMAE NORTH AMERICA
>
>
> A. Tullia Scholastica Cn. Liviae Ocellae quiritibus bonae voluntatis S.P.D.
>
>
> Cn. Livia Ocella L. Iuliae Aquilae omnibus SPD,
>
> This sounds like a wonderful event! Unfortunately I cannot attend for a couple
> of reasons (busy time of the school year, as well as it being Canadian
> Thanksgiving weekend),
>
> ATS: And the US Columbus Day weekend, which means that schools, banks,
> and government offices are closed in both countries. Ocella, if you could get
> yourself here (i.e., about 90 miles south of your location), I could take you
> the rest of the way as I will be driving (if I can attend). If interested,
> you could write to me privately.
>
>
> but how frequent are events like this held? I would love to attend a conventus
> in future if possible, but I worry that I am passing up a rare chance in this
> case.
>
> ATS: We had an aborted attempt at a North American conventus a few years
> back, located more or less centrally in the US, but the onsite person had
> apparently never organized anything and the event never got off the ground.
> Last year we had a small one in Nashville. Europe supposedly has one every
> year, but it has been several years since they actually did have one; the last
> two were cancelled. This one will be at Rota¹s Roman bed and breakfast, with
> Roman food. That is why the site was chosen. It would be worth your while to
> pass up a day or so of school, and even Canadian Thanksgiving to attend this.
> In any case, you would not HAVE to be present on Monday, the actual Canadian
> Thanksgiving...you could leave earlier, though I would stay.
>
> Optime vale et valete,
> Ocella
>
>
> Optime vale et valete.
>
>
>
>
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com <mailto:Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com> ,
> "luciaiuliaaquila" <luciaiuliaaquila@...> wrote:
>> >
>> > Salve, et salvete,
>> >
>> > To all Novi Romani, all without exception, I ask you to please plan to come
>> to this event; we must come together and get to know each other away from the
>> ML.
>> > We must put our heads together in meetings and enjoyable activities,
>> planned and impromptu, as Romans and work towards pulling our Respublica from
>> the depths in which She now wallows.
>> >
>> > We must put all animosity aside, or at least apply strong virtues and work
>> through it.
>> > I am not expecting us to hold hands around the campfire and sing kumbaya -
>> although with enough Mulsum this could happen but I warn you, should this
>> occur, I *will* document it with photos:)
>> > I do expect as adults with a common interest we will find that commonality
>> that will bind us together as Romans and we will come to a place where we can
>> all move forward towards a Res publica we can all be proud to be a part of.
>> >
>> > I cannot think of one Nova Roman citizen who I would not want to meet and
>> engage in a discussion with.
>> > Certainly there are many I could learn a great deal from, as well as those
>> who I may form a close bond of friendship with.
>> >
>> > It's time citizens, esp. those citizens in North America - I am asking this
>> of you Canada and Mexico as well - make your travel plans to join us in South
>> Carolina in six weeks.
>> > More info here, including a link to the Conventus yahoo ML:
>> > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma/message/79658
>> >
>> > I also would like to take this moment to extend to those Novi Romani
>> outside of North America to come and join us if you can. Airfares will be
>> less expensive at that time of the year and there are many deals going on
>> now. Free camping onsite is available and select members of the Provincia
>> Cohors and Aedilician Cohors will assist you with lodging should you not wish
>> to camp.
>> >
>> > The Conventus promises to be a wonderful event even though Rota and I may
>> be so exhausted by the time of its commencement that we may have to be
>> carried about on lecticae:,)
>> >
>> > Thank you Maior for the kind words.
>> >
>> > Thank you all Novi Romani for taking a few moments to read this post.
>> >
>> > Vale optime,
>> >
>> > L. Iulia Aquila
>> > Ædilis Curulis Novæ Romæ
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com <mailto:Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com> ,
>> "rory12001" <rory12001@> wrote:
>>> > >
>>> > > Euge! Julia;
>>> > > this is what it's all about. You and Rota are fantastic I've bought
>>> my tickets and I'll be there:) See you all fellow Novi Romani!
>>> > > optime valete
>>> > > Maior
>>> > >
>> >
>
>
>




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79723 From: M. Octavius Gracchus Date: 2010-08-25
Subject: Re: Dissolution? [ was PRAETORIAL SCRIBAE]
On 08/25/2010 02:38 PM, rory12001 wrote:
> M. Hortensia Cn. Liviae spd;
>
> no problem, I'm happy to discuss this with you. Any Roman association can form whether in Europe or the U.S. without NR dissolving.
>
> I'm concerned as I'm a member of the Board of directors of Nova Roma Corp, a registered 501(c)(3) nonprofit and we seem to do nothing but fight; not benefit our members. We take their money and do zero.
>
> That's why I want to put it to all the members: hear what they want.

I'm not a member anymore, but think this is a fine idea.

Face it - there will be *no* *peace* while Piscinus remains.

And once he's ousted, his supporters will seek revenge.

So, why not call it a day, and split it down the middle?

Make two groups.

Nova Roma Classic - for me and Cassius and Sulla and Vedius and Cincinnatus.

Nova Roma II - for you and Piscinus and Modianus and the Leges Saliciae.

(org names are mere examples)

Split the treasury down the middle.

Senators must declare allegiance to one or the other; they may not remain on the
senate of both.

The web site can be cloned, easily enough. Once people have declared for one
side or the other, mark them as 'resigned' in the other group's censor tools
(the four censors will need to communicate for this).

Wikis were made to be forked. Both wikis start out with the same content, and
will evolve separately from that point.

The trademark will either be shared by mutual agreement, or one group will buy
it from the other with their share of the $20K.

One group might retain the yellow-on-red colour scheme; the other might use the
metallic-gold-on-blue alternative, or some other.

novaroma.org would be replaced with a page that advertises *both* groups and
lets a newcomer pick between them.

Partition it. That's the only way.

Vale, Octavius.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79724 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2010-08-25
Subject: Re: INVITATION CONVENTVS NOVAE ROMAE NORTH AMERICA
>
>
>
> A. Tullia Scholastica C. Petronio Dextro quiritibus bonae voluntatis S.P.D.
>
> C. Petronius L. Juliae et omnibus s.p.d.,
>
>> > All are Invited to Attend the
>> > II CONVENTVS NOVAE ROMAE NORTH AMERICA
>
> I promiss that I will do all I can to be with you all at this Conventus.
>
> ATS: Gratissimus venies et venias! Spero te (et me) adfuturos participes
> esse.
>
> Unfortunately my passport was valid untill 2002. I did not need to update it
> because of the Sheingen Zone and licence to travel within Europe Union only
> with my French Identity card.
>
> ATS: LOL! Ut didicimus in primo anno linguae Gallicae, Voici votre carte
> d¹identité...
>
> But it is more difficult now to me to go in US that it was for La Fayette.
>
> I have to update my passport and obtain Visa. I will begin the procees to
> obtain these papers since tomorrow Thursday August 25th, hoping that I will
> obtain all those papers for October 8th in order to be with you all at this
> North America Conventus.
>
> ATS: Optimé! Speremus ex animo te participem facturum! I don¹t think
> you would need a visa for the US; we more or less trust your countrymen. The
> passport, however, is a necessity...
>
> Optime valete.
>
> C. Petronius Dexter
> Arcoiali scribebat
> a. d. VIII Kalendas Septembres P. Memmio K. Fabio II coss.

Et tu, et vos!
>
>
>




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79725 From: Gnaea Livia Ocella Date: 2010-08-25
Subject: Re: INVITATION CONVENTVS NOVAE ROMAE NORTH AMERICA
Cn. Livia Ocella A. Tulliae Scholasticae S.P.D.,

Ah, your offer is tempting. I will have to think on it very deeply, and also consult my parents - I still live under their roof, and, as my pater says, his roof = his rules. He has already decided that he will not stop me from taking off to Rome next February (a trip I planned without his knowledge - he was not impressed), but it will take some convincing in this case, especially as he and my mother are both very mistrustful of anything involving people one might meet on the Internet (needlessly mistrustful, of course, but the evening news with all its shock tactics has proven effective on them).

Optime vale,
Livia Ocella

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "A. Tullia Scholastica" <fororom@...> wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > A. Tullia Scholastica Cn. Liviae Ocellae quiritibus bonae voluntatis S.P.D.
> >
> >
> > Cn. Livia Ocella L. Iuliae Aquilae omnibus SPD,
> >
> > This sounds like a wonderful event! Unfortunately I cannot attend for a couple
> > of reasons (busy time of the school year, as well as it being Canadian
> > Thanksgiving weekend),
> >
> > ATS: And the US Columbus Day weekend, which means that schools, banks,
> > and government offices are closed in both countries. Ocella, if you could get
> > yourself here (i.e., about 90 miles south of your location), I could take you
> > the rest of the way as I will be driving (if I can attend). If interested,
> > you could write to me privately.
> >
> >
> > but how frequent are events like this held? I would love to attend a conventus
> > in future if possible, but I worry that I am passing up a rare chance in this
> > case.
> >
> > ATS: We had an aborted attempt at a North American conventus a few years
> > back, located more or less centrally in the US, but the onsite person had
> > apparently never organized anything and the event never got off the ground.
> > Last year we had a small one in Nashville. Europe supposedly has one every
> > year, but it has been several years since they actually did have one; the last
> > two were cancelled. This one will be at Rota¹s Roman bed and breakfast, with
> > Roman food. That is why the site was chosen. It would be worth your while to
> > pass up a day or so of school, and even Canadian Thanksgiving to attend this.
> > In any case, you would not HAVE to be present on Monday, the actual Canadian
> > Thanksgiving...you could leave earlier, though I would stay.
> >
> > Optime vale et valete,
> > Ocella
> >
> >
> > Optime vale et valete.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com <mailto:Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com> ,
> > "luciaiuliaaquila" <luciaiuliaaquila@> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > Salve, et salvete,
> >> >
> >> > To all Novi Romani, all without exception, I ask you to please plan to come
> >> to this event; we must come together and get to know each other away from the
> >> ML.
> >> > We must put our heads together in meetings and enjoyable activities,
> >> planned and impromptu, as Romans and work towards pulling our Respublica from
> >> the depths in which She now wallows.
> >> >
> >> > We must put all animosity aside, or at least apply strong virtues and work
> >> through it.
> >> > I am not expecting us to hold hands around the campfire and sing kumbaya -
> >> although with enough Mulsum this could happen but I warn you, should this
> >> occur, I *will* document it with photos:)
> >> > I do expect as adults with a common interest we will find that commonality
> >> that will bind us together as Romans and we will come to a place where we can
> >> all move forward towards a Res publica we can all be proud to be a part of.
> >> >
> >> > I cannot think of one Nova Roman citizen who I would not want to meet and
> >> engage in a discussion with.
> >> > Certainly there are many I could learn a great deal from, as well as those
> >> who I may form a close bond of friendship with.
> >> >
> >> > It's time citizens, esp. those citizens in North America - I am asking this
> >> of you Canada and Mexico as well - make your travel plans to join us in South
> >> Carolina in six weeks.
> >> > More info here, including a link to the Conventus yahoo ML:
> >> > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma/message/79658
> >> >
> >> > I also would like to take this moment to extend to those Novi Romani
> >> outside of North America to come and join us if you can. Airfares will be
> >> less expensive at that time of the year and there are many deals going on
> >> now. Free camping onsite is available and select members of the Provincia
> >> Cohors and Aedilician Cohors will assist you with lodging should you not wish
> >> to camp.
> >> >
> >> > The Conventus promises to be a wonderful event even though Rota and I may
> >> be so exhausted by the time of its commencement that we may have to be
> >> carried about on lecticae:,)
> >> >
> >> > Thank you Maior for the kind words.
> >> >
> >> > Thank you all Novi Romani for taking a few moments to read this post.
> >> >
> >> > Vale optime,
> >> >
> >> > L. Iulia Aquila
> >> > Ædilis Curulis Novæ Romæ
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com <mailto:Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com> ,
> >> "rory12001" <rory12001@> wrote:
> >>> > >
> >>> > > Euge! Julia;
> >>> > > this is what it's all about. You and Rota are fantastic I've bought
> >>> my tickets and I'll be there:) See you all fellow Novi Romani!
> >>> > > optime valete
> >>> > > Maior
> >>> > >
> >> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79726 From: rory12001 Date: 2010-08-25
Subject: Re: Dissolution? [ was PRAETORIAL SCRIBAE]
Salve Gracche;
I agree with you. I think that is an eminently fair and just solution.
Maior
>
> So, why not call it a day, and split it down the middle?
>
> Make two groups.
>
> Nova Roma Classic - for me and Cassius and Sulla and Vedius and Cincinnatus.
>
> Nova Roma II - for you and Piscinus and Modianus and the Leges Saliciae.
>
> (org names are mere examples)
>
> Split the treasury down the middle.
>
> Senators must declare allegiance to one or the other; they may not remain on the
> senate of both.
>
> The web site can be cloned, easily enough. Once people have declared for one
> side or the other, mark them as 'resigned' in the other group's censor tools
> (the four censors will need to communicate for this).
>
> Wikis were made to be forked. Both wikis start out with the same content, and
> will evolve separately from that point.
>
> The trademark will either be shared by mutual agreement, or one group will buy
> it from the other with their share of the $20K.
>
> One group might retain the yellow-on-red colour scheme; the other might use the
> metallic-gold-on-blue alternative, or some other.
>
> novaroma.org would be replaced with a page that advertises *both* groups and
> lets a newcomer pick between them.
>
> Partition it. That's the only way.
>
> Vale, Octavius.
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79727 From: lathyrus77 Date: 2010-08-25
Subject: Re: DISSOLUTION?
I suspect Nova roma never gets any real land.


I know of heathen group who've gotten land and built temples in less time than Nova Roma has existed. Nova Roma has exponentially more members, and more money, yet hasn't any land anywhere. If you haven't done it by now, it's doubtful you'll ever do it.


--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, QFabiusMaxmi@... wrote:
>
>
>
> there is 20K of the cives money that is hoarded and never spent by the Board of Directors.
>
>
>
>
>
> Of course its not spent, Senator. We need to buy 108 acres of land, probably on an island, and we need to pay construction costs for our buildings. If that's called hording, so be it. I call it financial management.
> As for the calls of dissolution. let's face it. Without the corporation and the Constitution, NR would have ceased to exist a long time ago. That money is not your bank account, Senator. I pay my dues for the reason which I started the dues concept under my and Minucius’ Consulship. To acquire and maintain our stated goal of land.
>
> Q. Fabius Maximus
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: rory12001 <rory12001@...>
> To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Wed, Aug 25, 2010 12:08 pm
> Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: DISSOLUTION? [ was PRAETORIAL SCRIBAE]
>
>
>
>
> Salvete;
> there is 20K of the cives money that is hoarded and never spent by the Board of Directors.
>
> I find this situation unethical as our nonprofit promises to advance Roman culture and religio. It doesn't.
>
> I think the time has come for everyone to vote on what they think of Nova Roma. And let the cives tell the Board what it wants. They exist to serve the membership not the other way around.
>
> http://www.mainelegislature.org/legis/statutes/13-b/title13-Bch11sec0.html
> vale
> M.Hortensia Maior
>
> >
> > Wouldn't it be easier for you to just resign instead of trying to get the
> > corporation dissolved?
> >
> > Vale,
> >
> > Sulla
> >
> > On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 11:34 AM, rory12001 <rory12001@> wrote:
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > Maior Liviae spd;
> > > I'm beginning to think you are right amica, we could re-form enjoy our
> > > friends, the gods, Romanitas without all the toxic fighting.
> > >
> > > The membership of NR could vote for dissolution: I checked the statue
> > > below, we could even do it before a board resolution to show the Senate just
> > > what the silent majority think.
> > >
> > > http://www.mainelegislature.org/legis/statutes/13-b/title13-Bsec1101.html
> > >
> > > >
> > > > Livia Hortensiae sal.
> > > >
> > > > Apparently it's too much. Now even people I considered as friends have
> > > > joined the mobbing action against you.
> > > >
> > > > I'm starting to think we should all leave Nova Roma, and leave it in the
> > > > hands of Cato, Sulla, Octavius, etc., which is obviously the aim they are
> > >
> > > > trying to reach. But after they got what they want they would only have
> > > each
> > > > other to hurl insults at.
> > > >
> > > > Optime vale,
> > > > Livia
> > > >
> > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > From: "rory12001" <rory12001@>
> > > > To: <Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com <Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com>>
> > > > Sent: Wednesday, August 25, 2010 6:12 AM
> > > > Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Report of the August session of the Collegium
> > > > Pontificum PRAETORIAL SCRIBAE
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > M. Hortensia Scribae spd;
> > > >
> > > > is it asking too much to be able to post without this incessant barrage
> > > > of insults? It isn't funny it creates an ML where others fear to post;
> > > for
> > > > fear next time it will be THEM.,,,
> > > >
> > > > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com <Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com>,
> > > "petronius_dexter" <jfarnoud94@> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Ave Sulla,
> > > > >
> > > > > It seems to me that many stories by Stephen King have the Maine as
> > > > > theater...
> > > > >
> > > > > So perhaps that explains this Maior's mind capture...
> > > > >
> > > > > Vale.
> > > > >
> > > > > C. Petronius Dexter
> > > > > Arcoiali scribebat
> > > > > a. d. VIII Kalendas Septembres P. Memmio K. Fabio II coss.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com <Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com>, Robert
> > > Woolwine <robert.woolwine@>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > *Whack*
> > > > > >
> > > > > > *WHACK*
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Misery, gotta love how Stephen King has captured the essence of
> > > Maior.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Vale,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Sulla
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 2:12 PM, rory12001 <rory12001@> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > M. Hortensia Piscino Quiritibus spd;
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Piscine; my friend from Hibernia, Lupus, wrote to me about Nova
> > > Roma
> > > > > > > "I
> > > > > > > can't believe how bad it's got"....
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I won't participate in the endless online name-calling, arguing
> > > > > > > etc...It's
> > > > > > > a waste, Nova Roma's ML is dominated by a samll group of
> > > destructive
> > > > > > > people
> > > > > > > who have no desire to make or do anything positive on behalf of the
> > >
> > > > > > > Religio
> > > > > > > Romana or living Roman culture.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > di me favet
> > > > > > > M. Hortensia Maior
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com <Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com><Nova-Roma%
> > > 40yahoogroups.com>,
> > > > > > > "marcushoratius" <MHoratius@> wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Salve Cato
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com <Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com><Nova-Roma%
> > > 40yahoogroups.com>,
> > > > > > > > "Cato"
> > > > > > > <catoinnyc@> wrote:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Cato Maiori sal.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com <Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com><Nova-Roma%
> > > 40yahoogroups.com>,
> > > > > > > "rory12001" <rory12001@> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Salve Palladi;
> > > > > > > > > > all the cultores including me & the majority of the CP have
> > > the
> > > > > > > highest regard for M. Moravius Piscinus
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > CATO: another lie, and one that is on its face
> > > self-contradictory.
> > > > > > > > > I
> > > > > > > can name at least five cultores - including at least two pontiffs,
> > > > > > > both
> > > > > > > cultores - who do NOT hold Piscinus in any kind of regard at all
> > > and
> > > > > > > who, in
> > > > > > > fact, hold him responsible for the very worst damage done to the
> > > > > > > Respublica
> > > > > > > over the past three or four years.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > PISCINUS: You may want to reread this, and apologize for calling
> > > > > > > Hortensia a liar. She said "the majority of the CP." Two out of how
> > >
> > > > > > > many
> > > > > > > cultores who are in the Collegium Pontificum? Can't please
> > > everyone.
> > > > > > > And
> > > > > > > cultores would not agree with you that Pontifex Q. Fabius Maximus
> > > is a
> > > > > > > cultor Deorum at all when he advocates temple prostitution. What he
> > > > > > > practices and advocates is some Hollywood perversion of the religio
> > >
> > > > > > > Romana.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > And, yes, you do write a lot, but apparently you are a very poor
> > > > > > > > reader,
> > > > > > > for you find words that aren't written and miscomprehend those that
> > >
> > > > > > > are.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Vale
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > M. Moravius Piscinus
> > > > > > > > Pontifex Maximus
> > > > > > > > Magister Collegii Augurum
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79728 From: lathyrus77 Date: 2010-08-25
Subject: Re: Dissolution? [ was PRAETORIAL SCRIBAE]
This is a good idea.

And not everything has to be separate; since there is a natural rivalry, the ludi games would be a lot more interesting.




--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "M. Octavius Gracchus" <octaviusgracchus@...> wrote:
>
> On 08/25/2010 02:38 PM, rory12001 wrote:
> > M. Hortensia Cn. Liviae spd;
> >
> > no problem, I'm happy to discuss this with you. Any Roman association can form whether in Europe or the U.S. without NR dissolving.
> >
> > I'm concerned as I'm a member of the Board of directors of Nova Roma Corp, a registered 501(c)(3) nonprofit and we seem to do nothing but fight; not benefit our members. We take their money and do zero.
> >
> > That's why I want to put it to all the members: hear what they want.
>
> I'm not a member anymore, but think this is a fine idea.
>
> Face it - there will be *no* *peace* while Piscinus remains.
>
> And once he's ousted, his supporters will seek revenge.
>
> So, why not call it a day, and split it down the middle?
>
> Make two groups.
>
> Nova Roma Classic - for me and Cassius and Sulla and Vedius and Cincinnatus.
>
> Nova Roma II - for you and Piscinus and Modianus and the Leges Saliciae.
>
> (org names are mere examples)
>
> Split the treasury down the middle.
>
> Senators must declare allegiance to one or the other; they may not remain on the
> senate of both.
>
> The web site can be cloned, easily enough. Once people have declared for one
> side or the other, mark them as 'resigned' in the other group's censor tools
> (the four censors will need to communicate for this).
>
> Wikis were made to be forked. Both wikis start out with the same content, and
> will evolve separately from that point.
>
> The trademark will either be shared by mutual agreement, or one group will buy
> it from the other with their share of the $20K.
>
> One group might retain the yellow-on-red colour scheme; the other might use the
> metallic-gold-on-blue alternative, or some other.
>
> novaroma.org would be replaced with a page that advertises *both* groups and
> lets a newcomer pick between them.
>
> Partition it. That's the only way.
>
> Vale, Octavius.
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79729 From: Belle Morte Statia Date: 2010-08-25
Subject: Re: INVITATION CONVENTVS NOVAE ROMAE NORTH AMERICA
Ave Iulia Aquila!

Hmmm... If anyone knows where I can find patterns for Roman/Greek attire
possibly I could ask our resident Tailor Metellus to concot something for
Aeternia (if I ask very very nicely). But not sure if I can request the
time off or find a traveling companion to accompany me, it would be nice to
have Kitabear with me but so many people and my beloved hound, he'd be all
over the place lol.

Now that I see you also have dancing girls, I must say Julia and Rota do
know how to put on a shindig..

I shall look into the matter more so that I may be able to attend.

Vale Optime,
Aeternia

On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 11:53 AM, luciaiuliaaquila <
luciaiuliaaquila@...> wrote:

>
>
> Ave Statia Aeternia!
>
> Very important questions!
>
> The status on garb is that we should all wear some:)
>
> It would be great for all of us to be able to dress in Roman clothing and
> my personal goal it to at least sell my wares wearing a tunica or khiton. We
> shall see, time may not be on my side.
>
> Currently we are coordinating with Scholastica to do a presentation on
> ancient clothing but she can tell you how to make a tunica or khiton
> etc.(they are easy, even stitched by hand) I am opting for a khiton, I hope.
> Rota's wife makes wonderful Roman clothing but I am not sure she will have
> time to do anything before the conventus - however she might could get your
> measurements and make something for you, but I am not sure - I will ask her.
> If you would like to volunteer to check about the internet and maybe help
> get a Roman clothing vendor to come that will earn you "Rota bucks".
> We will have a display of shield and sword and of course we have some folks
> from various legios. I will be bringing a couple of "personal" weapons
> myself. I have a few replicas as well that are not the best but I am
> bringing them - the best will be brought by Rota and other legionairres.
> As for curvesque figures - I am thankful for Roman clothing! LaWren's nest
> finally has put up some new clothing and has some for we more voluptuous
> types. http://www.lawrensnest.com/roman.html
> If you come I do hope you plan to take advantage of the open forum and read
> an appropriate poem or two:)
>
> Vale,
>
> Julia
>
>
> <syrenslullaby@...> wrote:
> >
> > Statia Aeternia Iuliae Aquilae sal:
> >
> >
> > Wow this looks like you all will have a blast for sure! What's the status
> > on garb? Will you have vendors there who specialize in Roman Clothing and
> > Weaponry? Actually the most important question, will there be vendors who
> > specialize in Roman Clothing that cater those of the curvesque nature??
> >
> > Important Questions :-)
> >
> > Vale Optime,
> > Statia Aeternia
>
> >
>
>
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79730 From: M. Octavius Gracchus Date: 2010-08-25
Subject: the partitioning of Nova Roma.
On 08/25/2010 03:55 PM, lathyrus77 wrote:
> This is a good idea.
>
> And not everything has to be separate; since there is a natural rivalry, the ludi games would be a lot more interesting.

Right now, at any time, either the Establishment or the Resistance could form a
new group of their own, and forbid the leaders of the opposition from joining.
That is psychologically unsatisfactory.

For it would be "letting the b******s win", "running away", "taking our marbles
and going home", etc.

So long as the other side gets the name Nova Roma, the treasury, the web site,
the continuity... neither faction will give up willingly.

Partition solves that. We wouldn't be giving up Nova Roma to our enemies...
we'd be keeping the best of it, and throwing the bums out.

Both groups would have a name that was some variant of "Nova Roma", if they
wished; but neither group could use "Nova Roma" without the modifier.

(That would be repugnant - giving the name of "Nova Roma" to the adversary.
That would be admitting defeat. So, neither group should use it.)

Both groups would lay claim to the shared history of 1998-2010; we would refer
to events by the names of the consuls of those years, even of those consuls went
to the other side.

Neither group has to give up the web site, which is a bit dated but has some
good features, and lots of good wiki content... we'd clone it. Roma Red, Roma
Blue; with novaroma.org just a placeholder page that suggests visitors look at both.

Aside from a few grudges amongst the old-timers on both sides, the rivalry could
even be a friendly one, as you say; there could be occasional games between
them. Even a shared Conventus would be possible, though it would probably be
unwise to have me and Piscinus in the same room without a heavily armed
policeman standing watch. (mods: this is a joke, not a threat).

Consuls, Censors, leaders of the Senate... would it be worth half the treasury
and a change of the organization name to have all of your enemies simply *go*
*away*, peacefully and voluntarily?

And then, with your adversaries no longer caring at all about your internal
affairs, polluting this mailing list with rants against you, or quarreling about
who the "real" pontifex maximus is, you can engage them - from a safe distance -
in occasional sporting events or cooperative projects.

PARTITION. It's the only way.

Vale, Octavius.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79731 From: lathyrus77 Date: 2010-08-25
Subject: Re: the partitioning of Nova Roma.
I agree partition is the only way to solve 99% of the problems. I have some logistics questions:


How would we legally divide the treasury?

Who holds the trademarks and copyrights? Do we share copyright?

Would we have liasons between the to sides?

Is there a possibility for the litigious among us to wage legal battle between the two groups?

I'm assuming each side will have a PM, and preist groups. Will they confer so as keep the religio whole?


- Anna

AKA Annia Minucia Marcella


--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "M. Octavius Gracchus" <octaviusgracchus@...> wrote:
>
> On 08/25/2010 03:55 PM, lathyrus77 wrote:
> > This is a good idea.
> >
> > And not everything has to be separate; since there is a natural rivalry, the ludi games would be a lot more interesting.
>
> Right now, at any time, either the Establishment or the Resistance could form a
> new group of their own, and forbid the leaders of the opposition from joining.
> That is psychologically unsatisfactory.
>
> For it would be "letting the b******s win", "running away", "taking our marbles
> and going home", etc.
>
> So long as the other side gets the name Nova Roma, the treasury, the web site,
> the continuity... neither faction will give up willingly.
>
> Partition solves that. We wouldn't be giving up Nova Roma to our enemies...
> we'd be keeping the best of it, and throwing the bums out.
>
> Both groups would have a name that was some variant of "Nova Roma", if they
> wished; but neither group could use "Nova Roma" without the modifier.
>
> (That would be repugnant - giving the name of "Nova Roma" to the adversary.
> That would be admitting defeat. So, neither group should use it.)
>
> Both groups would lay claim to the shared history of 1998-2010; we would refer
> to events by the names of the consuls of those years, even of those consuls went
> to the other side.
>
> Neither group has to give up the web site, which is a bit dated but has some
> good features, and lots of good wiki content... we'd clone it. Roma Red, Roma
> Blue; with novaroma.org just a placeholder page that suggests visitors look at both.
>
> Aside from a few grudges amongst the old-timers on both sides, the rivalry could
> even be a friendly one, as you say; there could be occasional games between
> them. Even a shared Conventus would be possible, though it would probably be
> unwise to have me and Piscinus in the same room without a heavily armed
> policeman standing watch. (mods: this is a joke, not a threat).
>
> Consuls, Censors, leaders of the Senate... would it be worth half the treasury
> and a change of the organization name to have all of your enemies simply *go*
> *away*, peacefully and voluntarily?
>
> And then, with your adversaries no longer caring at all about your internal
> affairs, polluting this mailing list with rants against you, or quarreling about
> who the "real" pontifex maximus is, you can engage them - from a safe distance -
> in occasional sporting events or cooperative projects.
>
> PARTITION. It's the only way.
>
> Vale, Octavius.
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79732 From: Publius Memmius Albucius Date: 2010-08-25
Subject: FW: [NovaRoma-Announce] Request for auspices (next Senate session)
Auguribus s.d.



Though I have been reported that your agenda was very busy, and that you had other priorities than answering a consul, I feel however useful to remind my request below, and that I asked you to answer for last 23rd, two days ago.



Vobis gratias et valete,





Albucius cos.





To: mhoratius@...; tau.athanasios@...; marcus.lucretius@...
CC: nova-roma@yahoogroups.com; novaroma-announce@yahoogroups.com; nr_senaculum@yahoogroups.com
From: albucius_aoe@...
Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2010 01:37:16 +0200
Subject: [NovaRoma-Announce] Request for auspices (next Senate session)






Salvete Augures,

As usual since last January, I am coming to you, so that the auspices be taken by one of you, according your choice, for the next Senate session that I intend calling for next a.d. IX Kal. Sept., with a vote beginning on pridie Kal. Sept..

I hope that, after four missed opportunities, nothing will prevent you, this time, to place your science at the service of my modest convening.

Thanks for informing me who will take the auspices, and to inform me of their result no later than next 23rd.

If ever the auspices were not favorable, I hereby inform you that I would convene the Senate for the soonest available day, this is to say for a vote on Sept. 3, or Sept. 4, or on 5 or on 7, etc.. Please therefore, in case of defavorable auspices, taking them for each of these dates until the Gods accept a favorable day.

Vobis gratias et valete tres,


P. Memmius Albucius cos.







[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79733 From: fauxrari Date: 2010-08-25
Subject: Re: INVITATION CONVENTVS NOVAE ROMAE NORTH AMERICA
Salve, L. Iulia Aquila!

I wish you the best in this endeavor! I live in the far, far middle of nowhere (Bakersfield, CA) and cannot make it out this time. I wish you and the rest of your NR guests well. I hope and know this will be a spectacular event!

Best wishes,

L. Antonia Auriga

P.S. Just wondering if you were working with one of the many Legions on the East coast?

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "luciaiuliaaquila" <luciaiuliaaquila@...> wrote:
>
> Salve, et salvete,
>
> To all Novi Romani, all without exception, I ask you to please plan to come to this event; we must come together and get to know each other away from the ML.
> We must put our heads together in meetings and enjoyable activities, planned and impromptu, as Romans and work towards pulling our Respublica from the depths in which She now wallows.

... etc., al.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79734 From: luciaiuliaaquila Date: 2010-08-25
Subject: Re: INVITATION CONVENTVS NOVAE ROMAE NORTH AMERICA
Ave Statia Aeternia!

Rota and I just finished discussing this and we are going to set a block of time for Magistra's ancient clothing workshop and Rota's wife Sonia, will be taking measurements for custom clothing. Of course she will be completeing the creation of the garments after the conventus, but she does beautiful work. Look at the Ludi Megalenses from earlier this year and she is wearing a tunic that she made. If this is something you might want to do you might also consider purchasing some material you like.
You will need two panels of cloth, linen is ok but fine summer wieght wool will probably drape better and won't wrinkle as easy. Of course you can use silk as well, raw silk is easier to take care of and ca usually be handwashed. Each panel should be 45" to 52" wide (these are usually the widths you will find in the store) bear in mind the width also dictates how long the "sleeves" will be. The length should be your height from the neck to floor plus about a foot so that when you tie it at the waist it will drape nicely and not be restricting. The Palla is a rectangular piece of material at least 5' by 9' but it can be bigger for comfort.
I hope Livia and Magistra see this so they can add to, or correct, what I just told you:)

Now you should join the info group - and then start a new thread and post this under "Roman Clothing" *laughs*

Vale bene,

Julia




--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Belle Morte Statia <syrenslullaby@...> wrote:
>
> Ave Iulia Aquila!
>
> Hmmm... If anyone knows where I can find patterns for Roman/Greek attire
> possibly I could ask our resident Tailor Metellus to concot something for
> Aeternia (if I ask very very nicely). But not sure if I can request the
> time off or find a traveling companion to accompany me, it would be nice to
> have Kitabear with me but so many people and my beloved hound, he'd be all
> over the place lol.
>
> Now that I see you also have dancing girls, I must say Julia and Rota do
> know how to put on a shindig..
>
> I shall look into the matter more so that I may be able to attend.
>
> Vale Optime,
> Aeternia
>
> On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 11:53 AM, luciaiuliaaquila <
> luciaiuliaaquila@...> wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > Ave Statia Aeternia!
> >
> > Very important questions!
> >
> > The status on garb is that we should all wear some:)
> >
> > It would be great for all of us to be able to dress in Roman clothing and
> > my personal goal it to at least sell my wares wearing a tunica or khiton. We
> > shall see, time may not be on my side.
> >
> > Currently we are coordinating with Scholastica to do a presentation on
> > ancient clothing but she can tell you how to make a tunica or khiton
> > etc.(they are easy, even stitched by hand) I am opting for a khiton, I hope.
> > Rota's wife makes wonderful Roman clothing but I am not sure she will have
> > time to do anything before the conventus - however she might could get your
> > measurements and make something for you, but I am not sure - I will ask her.
> > If you would like to volunteer to check about the internet and maybe help
> > get a Roman clothing vendor to come that will earn you "Rota bucks".
> > We will have a display of shield and sword and of course we have some folks
> > from various legios. I will be bringing a couple of "personal" weapons
> > myself. I have a few replicas as well that are not the best but I am
> > bringing them - the best will be brought by Rota and other legionairres.
> > As for curvesque figures - I am thankful for Roman clothing! LaWren's nest
> > finally has put up some new clothing and has some for we more voluptuous
> > types. http://www.lawrensnest.com/roman.html
> > If you come I do hope you plan to take advantage of the open forum and read
> > an appropriate poem or two:)
> >
> > Vale,
> >
> > Julia
> >
> >
> > <syrenslullaby@> wrote:
> > >
> > > Statia Aeternia Iuliae Aquilae sal:
> > >
> > >
> > > Wow this looks like you all will have a blast for sure! What's the status
> > > on garb? Will you have vendors there who specialize in Roman Clothing and
> > > Weaponry? Actually the most important question, will there be vendors who
> > > specialize in Roman Clothing that cater those of the curvesque nature??
> > >
> > > Important Questions :-)
> > >
> > > Vale Optime,
> > > Statia Aeternia
> >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79735 From: luciaiuliaaquila Date: 2010-08-25
Subject: Re: INVITATION CONVENTVS NOVAE ROMAE NORTH AMERICA
Salve Lucia Antonia!

Oh I know Bakersfield! Now the Roman thing to do would be to get a caravan and pick up citizens along the way! Or you can go to tripadvisor and give them your destination and the notify you of cheap fares into the wilds of South Carolina.
We will miss you - but I am sure we will post many photos!
As for the legios - I leave that up to Rota because i am essentially lost when it comes to that but send him an email, he loves to talk Military and would appreciate it.

Thank you for the kind wished

Vale bene,

Julia

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "fauxrari" <drivergirl@...> wrote:
>
> Salve, L. Iulia Aquila!
>
> I wish you the best in this endeavor! I live in the far, far middle of nowhere (Bakersfield, CA) and cannot make it out this time. I wish you and the rest of your NR guests well. I hope and know this will be a spectacular event!
>
> Best wishes,
>
> L. Antonia Auriga
>
> P.S. Just wondering if you were working with one of the many Legions on the East coast?
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "luciaiuliaaquila" <luciaiuliaaquila@> wrote:
> >
> > Salve, et salvete,
> >
> > To all Novi Romani, all without exception, I ask you to please plan to come to this event; we must come together and get to know each other away from the ML.
> > We must put our heads together in meetings and enjoyable activities, planned and impromptu, as Romans and work towards pulling our Respublica from the depths in which She now wallows.
>
> ... etc., al.
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79736 From: C.Maria Caeca Date: 2010-08-25
Subject: Re: Polybius and Livy: The causes of the Second Punic War
I would be interested in reading this, Senator, if you would be so kind as to send it to me.

thank you.

C. Maria Caeca

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79737 From: C.Maria Caeca Date: 2010-08-25
Subject: Re: The Vestal Virgins and their imperial patrons: Sculptures and in
Senator, you may have already sent this ...I can't tell from the title, but I do have one that is similar. If you have not, I would appreciate seeing it.

Thank you.
C. Maria Caeca

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79738 From: C.Maria Caeca Date: 2010-08-25
Subject: Re: The Sibyl: A voice in the borderlands
Senator,

I would love to read this, and also "Rome at the crossroads" although I inadvertently deleted the initial post on it.

thank you,
C. Maria Caeca

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79739 From: QFabiusMaxmi@aol.com Date: 2010-08-25
Subject: Re: INVITATION CONVENTVS NOVAE ROMAE NORTH AMERICA
I live in the far, far middle of nowhere (Bakersfield, CA) and cannot make it out this time.

Wow! Bakersfield. You had a hot day today!

Fabius Maximus



MARKETPLACE

Get great advice about dogs and cats. Visit the Dog & Cat Answers Center.


Stay on top of your group activity without leaving the page you're on - Get the Yahoo! Toolbar now.


Hobbies & Activities Zone: Find others who share your passions! Explore new interests.



Switch to: Text-Only, Daily Digest • Unsubscribe • Terms of Use



.






[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79740 From: lathyrus77 Date: 2010-08-25
Subject: Re: LOL oh Nova Roma
Thanks for the invitation guys but I am prohibited from joining that list. Apparently I've been naughty.


-Anna Bucci

AKA Annia Minucia Marcella

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "aerdensrw" <aerdensrw@...> wrote:
>
> Anna/Annia!--I second Valerianus' invitation. I hope you'll join the Matronae list. There's also a Conventus Matronarum list that I'm told features more Latin and is probably more scholarly. On the Matronae list, we just like to talk.
>
> At the moment, we're talking about neuroanatomy and how it relates to language processing, so I'm quite enjoying myself. :)
>
> Paulla
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Gaius Tullius Valerianus <gaius.tullius.valerianus@> wrote:
> >
> > Salve Annia Minucia Marcella!
> >
> > It has been a while! If you're thinking of sticking around, there is a
> > thriving recent list for NR women at
> > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Matronae_Novae_Romae/ (which my wife tells me
> > is very good) . . .
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79741 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2010-08-25
Subject: Re: INVITATION CONVENTVS NOVAE ROMAE NORTH AMERICA
>
>
> A. Tullia Scholastica L. Juliae Aquilae Statiae Corneliae Aeternae quiritibus
> bonae voluntatis S.P.D.
>
>
> Ave Statia Aeternia!
>
> Rota and I just finished discussing this and we are going to set a block of
> time for Magistra's ancient clothing workshop and Rota's wife Sonia, will be
> taking measurements for custom clothing. Of course she will be completeing the
> creation of the garments after the conventus, but she does beautiful work.
> Look at the Ludi Megalenses from earlier this year and she is wearing a tunic
> that she made. If this is something you might want to do you might also
> consider purchasing some material you like.
> You will need two panels of cloth, linen is ok but fine summer wieght wool
> will probably drape better and won't wrinkle as easy. Of course you can use
> silk as well, raw silk is easier to take care of and ca usually be handwashed.
> Each panel should be 45" to 52" wide (these are usually the widths you will
> find in the store) bear in mind the width also dictates how long the "sleeves"
> will be. The length should be your height from the neck to floor plus about a
> foot so that when you tie it at the waist it will drape nicely and not be
> restricting. The Palla is a rectangular piece of material at least 5' by 9'
> but it can be bigger for comfort.
>
> ATS: Greek and Roman clothing, like that of some other peoples, belongs
> to what is called the draped tradition of clothing manufacture, not the
> tailored tradition used in much of Western attire. There are no patterns as
> such; clothing resembles sheets, blankets, and pillowcases which are fastened
> and draped in various ways. As Julia says, a tunica (or khiton) is made from
> two panels of fabric, seamed up the sides and (in the Roman tunica, and some
> forms of the Greek khiton) across the shoulders, then hemmed at the bottom.
> One can also cut into this and make a T-shape if desired, but the plain
> two-panel version is easier, and probably better for those who are pneumatic
> or chunky. In the latter case at least, I would try to get 56 inch fabric (or
> wider if possible). Vertically pleated crinkle cotton is fine for the khiton
> (cotton-poly is okay unless one is a reenactor), and plain cotton or linen or
> cotton/linen mixed is fine for the Roman women¹s tunica, as is silk. The men
> use wool, and the women can do the same if desired. The short men¹s khiton or
> men¹s tunica should fall to about mid-calf to the ankle when ungirt (and the
> Roman version at least was almost always girt), and the long khiton or women¹s
> tunica should be at least floor length; the long khiton (worn by women,
> deities, musicians, charioteers, and older men) had to be at least one foot
> longer than the wearer, and longer is better as multiple belts / ties were
> used. If one cannot find fabric wide enough that two panels will work (say
> one meter or a bit wider, perhaps 42 inches), one would have to use three
> panels and split the third vertically, then sew it to the other two, one
> section on each side so that it is even. The himation can be narrower, and so
> can the Greek capes, the chlamys and the chlaina; methinks that one would have
> to be quite tall to require a wide fabric even for the palla / pallium. To
> me, five feet wide would be overkill. The himation seems fine with maybe two
> to three yards (or meters) of 40-45 inch fabric, though this will depend on
> the size of the wearer, and the chlamys / chlaina requires even less, maybe
> two yards / meters.
>
>
> I hope Livia and Magistra see this so they can add to, or correct, what I just
> told you:)
>
> ATS: Magistra did see it...hope this helps.
>
> Now you should join the info group - and then start a new thread and post this
> under "Roman Clothing" *laughs*
>
> Vale bene,
>
> Julia
>
>
> Vale, et valete.
>
>
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com <mailto:Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com> , Belle
> Morte Statia <syrenslullaby@...> wrote:
>> >
>> > Ave Iulia Aquila!
>> >
>> > Hmmm... If anyone knows where I can find patterns for Roman/Greek attire
>> > possibly I could ask our resident Tailor Metellus to concot something for
>> > Aeternia (if I ask very very nicely). But not sure if I can request the
>> > time off or find a traveling companion to accompany me, it would be nice
>> to
>> > have Kitabear with me but so many people and my beloved hound, he'd be all
>> > over the place lol.
>> >
>> > Now that I see you also have dancing girls, I must say Julia and Rota do
>> > know how to put on a shindig..
>> >
>> > I shall look into the matter more so that I may be able to attend.
>> >
>> > Vale Optime,
>> > Aeternia
>> >
>> > On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 11:53 AM, luciaiuliaaquila <
>> > luciaiuliaaquila@...> wrote:
>> >
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > > Ave Statia Aeternia!
>>> > >
>>> > > Very important questions!
>>> > >
>>> > > The status on garb is that we should all wear some:)
>>> > >
>>> > > It would be great for all of us to be able to dress in Roman clothing
and
>>> > > my personal goal it to at least sell my wares wearing a tunica or
>>> khiton. We
>>> > > shall see, time may not be on my side.
>>> > >
>>> > > Currently we are coordinating with Scholastica to do a presentation on
>>> > > ancient clothing but she can tell you how to make a tunica or khiton
>>> > > etc.(they are easy, even stitched by hand) I am opting for a khiton, I
>>> hope.
>>> > > Rota's wife makes wonderful Roman clothing but I am not sure she will
>>> have
>>> > > time to do anything before the conventus - however she might could get
>>> your
>>> > > measurements and make something for you, but I am not sure - I will ask
>>> her.
>>> > > If you would like to volunteer to check about the internet and maybe >>>
help
>>> > > get a Roman clothing vendor to come that will earn you "Rota bucks".
>>> > > We will have a display of shield and sword and of course we have some
>>> folks
>>> > > from various legios. I will be bringing a couple of "personal" weapons
>>> > > myself. I have a few replicas as well that are not the best but I am
>>> > > bringing them - the best will be brought by Rota and other legionairres.
>>> > > As for curvesque figures - I am thankful for Roman clothing! LaWren's
>>> nest
>>> > > finally has put up some new clothing and has some for we more voluptuous
>>> > > types. http://www.lawrensnest.com/roman.html
>>> > > If you come I do hope you plan to take advantage of the open forum and
>>> read
>>> > > an appropriate poem or two:)
>>> > >
>>> > > Vale,
>>> > >
>>> > > Julia
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > > <syrenslullaby@> wrote:
>>>> > > >
>>>> > > > Statia Aeternia Iuliae Aquilae sal:
>>>> > > >
>>>> > > >
>>>> > > > Wow this looks like you all will have a blast for sure! What's the
>>>> status
>>>> > > > on garb? Will you have vendors there who specialize in Roman Clothing
and
>>>> > > > Weaponry? Actually the most important question, will there be vendors
who
>>>> > > > specialize in Roman Clothing that cater those of the curvesque
>>>> nature??
>>>> > > >
>>>> > > > Important Questions :-)
>>>> > > >
>>>> > > > Vale Optime,
>>>> > > > Statia Aeternia
>>> > >
>>>> > > >
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > >
>> >
>> >
>> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>> >
>
>




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79742 From: Belle Morte Statia Date: 2010-08-25
Subject: Re: INVITATION CONVENTVS NOVAE ROMAE NORTH AMERICA
Statia Cornelia Aeternia A. Tulliae Scholasticae L. Juliae Aquilae s.p.d.


Metellus take notes! So uh just out slight curiousity, when era of the
empire is garb required to be in? Is Barbarian attire accepted? Thats what
I normally wear, for my Roman Re-Enacting....

But something more traditional is always nice to have as well, especially in
black and purple...

*laughs nervously and hides*


Vale Optime,
Statia Aeternia

On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 5:22 PM, A. Tullia Scholastica <fororom@...
> wrote:

>
>
> >
> >
> > A. Tullia Scholastica L. Juliae Aquilae Statiae Corneliae Aeternae
> quiritibus
>
> > bonae voluntatis S.P.D.
> >
> >
> > Ave Statia Aeternia!
> >
> > Rota and I just finished discussing this and we are going to set a block
> of
> > time for Magistra's ancient clothing workshop and Rota's wife Sonia, will
> be
> > taking measurements for custom clothing. Of course she will be
> completeing the
> > creation of the garments after the conventus, but she does beautiful
> work.
> > Look at the Ludi Megalenses from earlier this year and she is wearing a
> tunic
> > that she made. If this is something you might want to do you might also
> > consider purchasing some material you like.
> > You will need two panels of cloth, linen is ok but fine summer wieght
> wool
> > will probably drape better and won't wrinkle as easy. Of course you can
> use
> > silk as well, raw silk is easier to take care of and ca usually be
> handwashed.
> > Each panel should be 45" to 52" wide (these are usually the widths you
> will
> > find in the store) bear in mind the width also dictates how long the
> "sleeves"
> > will be. The length should be your height from the neck to floor plus
> about a
> > foot so that when you tie it at the waist it will drape nicely and not be
> > restricting. The Palla is a rectangular piece of material at least 5' by
> 9'
> > but it can be bigger for comfort.
> >
> > ATS: Greek and Roman clothing, like that of some other peoples, belongs
> > to what is called the draped tradition of clothing manufacture, not the
> > tailored tradition used in much of Western attire. There are no patterns
> as
> > such; clothing resembles sheets, blankets, and pillowcases which are
> fastened
> > and draped in various ways. As Julia says, a tunica (or khiton) is made
> from
> > two panels of fabric, seamed up the sides and (in the Roman tunica, and
> some
> > forms of the Greek khiton) across the shoulders, then hemmed at the
> bottom.
> > One can also cut into this and make a T-shape if desired, but the plain
> > two-panel version is easier, and probably better for those who are
> pneumatic
> > or chunky. In the latter case at least, I would try to get 56 inch fabric
> (or
> > wider if possible). Vertically pleated crinkle cotton is fine for the
> khiton
> > (cotton-poly is okay unless one is a reenactor), and plain cotton or
> linen or
> > cotton/linen mixed is fine for the Roman women�s tunica, as is silk. The
> men
> > use wool, and the women can do the same if desired. The short men�s
> khiton or
> > men�s tunica should fall to about mid-calf to the ankle when ungirt (and
> the
> > Roman version at least was almost always girt), and the long khiton or
> women�s
> > tunica should be at least floor length; the long khiton (worn by women,
> > deities, musicians, charioteers, and older men) had to be at least one
> foot
> > longer than the wearer, and longer is better as multiple belts / ties
> were
> > used. If one cannot find fabric wide enough that two panels will work
> (say
> > one meter or a bit wider, perhaps 42 inches), one would have to use three
> > panels and split the third vertically, then sew it to the other two, one
> > section on each side so that it is even. The himation can be narrower,
> and so
> > can the Greek capes, the chlamys and the chlaina; methinks that one would
> have
> > to be quite tall to require a wide fabric even for the palla / pallium.
> To
> > me, five feet wide would be overkill. The himation seems fine with maybe
> two
> > to three yards (or meters) of 40-45 inch fabric, though this will depend
> on
> > the size of the wearer, and the chlamys / chlaina requires even less,
> maybe
> > two yards / meters.
>
> >
> >
> > I hope Livia and Magistra see this so they can add to, or correct, what I
> just
> > told you:)
> >
> > ATS: Magistra did see it...hope this helps.
>
> >
> > Now you should join the info group - and then start a new thread and post
> this
> > under "Roman Clothing" *laughs*
> >
> > Vale bene,
> >
> > Julia
> >
> >
> > Vale, et valete.
> >
> >
> >
> > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com <Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com> <mailto:
> Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com <Nova-Roma%2540yahoogroups.com>> , Belle
>
> > Morte Statia <syrenslullaby@...> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > Ave Iulia Aquila!
> >> >
> >> > Hmmm... If anyone knows where I can find patterns for Roman/Greek
> attire
> >> > possibly I could ask our resident Tailor Metellus to concot something
> for
> >> > Aeternia (if I ask very very nicely). But not sure if I can request
> the
> >> > time off or find a traveling companion to accompany me, it would be
> nice
> >> to
> >> > have Kitabear with me but so many people and my beloved hound, he'd be
> all
> >> > over the place lol.
> >> >
> >> > Now that I see you also have dancing girls, I must say Julia and Rota
> do
> >> > know how to put on a shindig..
> >> >
> >> > I shall look into the matter more so that I may be able to attend.
> >> >
> >> > Vale Optime,
> >> > Aeternia
> >> >
> >> > On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 11:53 AM, luciaiuliaaquila <
> >> > luciaiuliaaquila@...> wrote:
> >> >
> >>> > >
> >>> > >
> >>> > > Ave Statia Aeternia!
> >>> > >
> >>> > > Very important questions!
> >>> > >
> >>> > > The status on garb is that we should all wear some:)
> >>> > >
> >>> > > It would be great for all of us to be able to dress in Roman
> clothing
> and
> >>> > > my personal goal it to at least sell my wares wearing a tunica or
> >>> khiton. We
> >>> > > shall see, time may not be on my side.
> >>> > >
> >>> > > Currently we are coordinating with Scholastica to do a presentation
> on
> >>> > > ancient clothing but she can tell you how to make a tunica or
> khiton
> >>> > > etc.(they are easy, even stitched by hand) I am opting for a
> khiton, I
> >>> hope.
> >>> > > Rota's wife makes wonderful Roman clothing but I am not sure she
> will
> >>> have
> >>> > > time to do anything before the conventus - however she might could
> get
> >>> your
> >>> > > measurements and make something for you, but I am not sure - I will
> ask
> >>> her.
> >>> > > If you would like to volunteer to check about the internet and
> maybe >>>
> help
> >>> > > get a Roman clothing vendor to come that will earn you "Rota
> bucks".
> >>> > > We will have a display of shield and sword and of course we have
> some
> >>> folks
> >>> > > from various legios. I will be bringing a couple of "personal"
> weapons
> >>> > > myself. I have a few replicas as well that are not the best but I
> am
> >>> > > bringing them - the best will be brought by Rota and other
> legionairres.
> >>> > > As for curvesque figures - I am thankful for Roman clothing!
> LaWren's
> >>> nest
> >>> > > finally has put up some new clothing and has some for we more
> voluptuous
> >>> > > types. http://www.lawrensnest.com/roman.html
> >>> > > If you come I do hope you plan to take advantage of the open forum
> and
> >>> read
> >>> > > an appropriate poem or two:)
> >>> > >
> >>> > > Vale,
> >>> > >
> >>> > > Julia
> >>> > >
> >>> > >
> >>> > > <syrenslullaby@> wrote:
> >>>> > > >
> >>>> > > > Statia Aeternia Iuliae Aquilae sal:
> >>>> > > >
> >>>> > > >
> >>>> > > > Wow this looks like you all will have a blast for sure! What's
> the
> >>>> status
> >>>> > > > on garb? Will you have vendors there who specialize in Roman
> Clothing
> and
> >>>> > > > Weaponry? Actually the most important question, will there be
> vendors
> who
> >>>> > > > specialize in Roman Clothing that cater those of the curvesque
> >>>> nature??
> >>>> > > >
> >>>> > > > Important Questions :-)
> >>>> > > >
> >>>> > > > Vale Optime,
> >>>> > > > Statia Aeternia
> >>> > >
> >>>> > > >
> >>> > >
> >>> > >
> >>> > >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >> >
> >
> >
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79743 From: C.Maria Caeca Date: 2010-08-25
Subject: Re: INVITATION CONVENTVS NOVAE ROMAE NORTH AMERICA
Maria Caeca Liviae Ocellae sal,

Oh, yes ...you may be passing up a once in a life time opportunity!!!

(if I say that often and in various ways ...with logs of emphasis, think we can lure her to SC, Julia?)

Actually, I would like to reinforce Julia's invitation ...wait ...let me remember my Southern ..."all ya'all come, you hear me?"

Seriously, this conventus looks to be truly awesome ...and, if Julia and Rota don't make me carry them around *too* much ...I *promise* we will, at some point, sit around the fire and ...sing Cum bi ya! LOL, and I can promise this ...because I'll start it! (evil grin), and now ...I need to run away, very quickly ...and work on um lecture notes, I think. Or ...?

Valete quam optime,
Caeca

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79744 From: luciaiuliaaquila Date: 2010-08-25
Subject: Re: INVITATION CONVENTVS NOVAE ROMAE NORTH AMERICA
Iulia Aeterniae Magistrae S.P.D.


Thank you Magistra, I am moving this thread to the info group:)

>So uh just out slight curiousity, when era of the
> empire is garb required to be in?

Statia Aeternia *slow smile* The Republic. Don't worry about it too much, let your inner barbarian shine!
I have no problem with black and purple:)

I will not be dressed in "period" the entire time:)

Valete bene,

Julia





--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Belle Morte Statia <syrenslullaby@...> wrote:
>
> Statia Cornelia Aeternia A. Tulliae Scholasticae L. Juliae Aquilae s.p.d.
>
>
> Metellus take notes! So uh just out slight curiousity, when era of the
> empire is garb required to be in? Is Barbarian attire accepted? Thats what
> I normally wear, for my Roman Re-Enacting....
>
> But something more traditional is always nice to have as well, especially in
> black and purple...
>
> *laughs nervously and hides*
>
>
> Vale Optime,
> Statia Aeternia
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79745 From: luciaiuliaaquila Date: 2010-08-25
Subject: Re: INVITATION CONVENTVS NOVAE ROMAE NORTH AMERICA
Ave Gaia Maria,

If the promise of bare chested male fire dancers won't get her from the North Country I do not know what will....

*laughs*

Vale,

Julia




--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "C.Maria Caeca" <c.mariacaeca@...> wrote:
>
> Maria Caeca Liviae Ocellae sal,
>
> Oh, yes ...you may be passing up a once in a life time opportunity!!!
>
> (if I say that often and in various ways ...with logs of emphasis, think we can lure her to SC, Julia?)
>
> Actually, I would like to reinforce Julia's invitation ...wait ...let me remember my Southern ..."all ya'all come, you hear me?"
>
> Seriously, this conventus looks to be truly awesome ...and, if Julia and Rota don't make me carry them around *too* much ...I *promise* we will, at some point, sit around the fire and ...sing Cum bi ya! LOL, and I can promise this ...because I'll start it! (evil grin), and now ...I need to run away, very quickly ...and work on um lecture notes, I think. Or ...?
>
> Valete quam optime,
> Caeca
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79746 From: M. Octavius Gracchus Date: 2010-08-25
Subject: Re: the partitioning of Nova Roma.
Annia Minucia Marcella wrote:
> How would we legally divide the treasury?

Quick answer: give about 10% of it to a lawyer and let them figure it out.

I'm sure it's doable. The Maine statues that Maior posted earlier mentioned
transfering the treasury of a nonprofit to an organization engaged in similar
activities. Splitting it among *two* similar organizations shouldn't be difficult.

> Who holds the trademarks and copyrights? Do we share copyright?

I don't know if it's possible for two groups to hold the trademark jointly; it
might be that one side would keep it, and would issue some sort of irrevocable
license to the other.

And if that's not possible, then *both* would have to change their names to
something that didn't include "Nova Roma" at all. I think it's important that
neither gets to claim exclusive rights to the name, for that would make those of
the other group feel like they'd been banished.

I think there'll be a lot of legal paperwork involved in this in any case.

As for copyrights to the web site, we'd have the major contributors sign
statements saying they allow the other group to use, modify, redistribute their
content. In the free software world, there are various licenses for this, like
the GFDL or Creative Commons; we'd mimic one of these.

The two sides might even jointly sponsor the project to rebuild the web site in
a modern framework, assuming they can agree on the requirements; the programmer
would simply deliver two independent installations of the same thing.

> Would we have liasons between the to sides?

Oh, absolutely. There are a few people who are respected by both factions:
Venator, Audens, Pompeia... whichever side they end up on, they'll make good
ambassadors.

I think we need a rule that one can't be in the Senate or Collegia of both
groups simultaneously, but being an ordinary member of both shouldn't be a problem.

> Is there a possibility for the litigious among us to wage legal battle between the two groups?

This is always hard to prevent (at least in America, where lawyers outnumber
humans 2:1), but by removing everyone's enemies to a group that can, for the
most part, be ignored, there's less opportunity for conflict.

It'll be like when SVR spun away from NR. We were aware they had consuls, a
Pontifex Maximus, and a Senate, but nobody really cared - out of sight, out of mind.

> I'm assuming each side will have a PM, and preist groups.
> Will they confer so as keep the religio whole?

Almost certainly not. Those of us in the anti-establishment faction *loathe*
Piscinus, and will *never* acknowledge him as PM or Augur. Cassius is our
Pontifex Maximus, and will be until the day he dies or *voluntarily* gives up
the office.

No, our collegia will do our thing, the other collegia will do their thing, and
they'll ignore each other. Maybe they'll read and comment on each other's
academic papers, but that'd be the limit of cooperation.

There might be some joint invocation if there's a conventus, but otherwise it'll
be just like Catholics and Protestants and Orthodox - each do their own thing.

Vale, Octavius.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79747 From: gualterus_graecus Date: 2010-08-25
Subject: Re: the partitioning of Nova Roma.
Salve,

I think this is a great idea and should be seriously considered.

Vale,

Gualterus

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "M. Octavius Gracchus" <octaviusgracchus@...> wrote:
>
> Annia Minucia Marcella wrote:
> > How would we legally divide the treasury?
>
> Quick answer: give about 10% of it to a lawyer and let them figure it out.
>
> I'm sure it's doable. The Maine statues that Maior posted earlier mentioned
> transfering the treasury of a nonprofit to an organization engaged in similar
> activities. Splitting it among *two* similar organizations shouldn't be difficult.
>
> > Who holds the trademarks and copyrights? Do we share copyright?
>
> I don't know if it's possible for two groups to hold the trademark jointly; it
> might be that one side would keep it, and would issue some sort of irrevocable
> license to the other.
>
> And if that's not possible, then *both* would have to change their names to
> something that didn't include "Nova Roma" at all. I think it's important that
> neither gets to claim exclusive rights to the name, for that would make those of
> the other group feel like they'd been banished.
>
> I think there'll be a lot of legal paperwork involved in this in any case.
>
> As for copyrights to the web site, we'd have the major contributors sign
> statements saying they allow the other group to use, modify, redistribute their
> content. In the free software world, there are various licenses for this, like
> the GFDL or Creative Commons; we'd mimic one of these.
>
> The two sides might even jointly sponsor the project to rebuild the web site in
> a modern framework, assuming they can agree on the requirements; the programmer
> would simply deliver two independent installations of the same thing.
>
> > Would we have liasons between the to sides?
>
> Oh, absolutely. There are a few people who are respected by both factions:
> Venator, Audens, Pompeia... whichever side they end up on, they'll make good
> ambassadors.
>
> I think we need a rule that one can't be in the Senate or Collegia of both
> groups simultaneously, but being an ordinary member of both shouldn't be a problem.
>
> > Is there a possibility for the litigious among us to wage legal battle between the two groups?
>
> This is always hard to prevent (at least in America, where lawyers outnumber
> humans 2:1), but by removing everyone's enemies to a group that can, for the
> most part, be ignored, there's less opportunity for conflict.
>
> It'll be like when SVR spun away from NR. We were aware they had consuls, a
> Pontifex Maximus, and a Senate, but nobody really cared - out of sight, out of mind.
>
> > I'm assuming each side will have a PM, and preist groups.
> > Will they confer so as keep the religio whole?
>
> Almost certainly not. Those of us in the anti-establishment faction *loathe*
> Piscinus, and will *never* acknowledge him as PM or Augur. Cassius is our
> Pontifex Maximus, and will be until the day he dies or *voluntarily* gives up
> the office.
>
> No, our collegia will do our thing, the other collegia will do their thing, and
> they'll ignore each other. Maybe they'll read and comment on each other's
> academic papers, but that'd be the limit of cooperation.
>
> There might be some joint invocation if there's a conventus, but otherwise it'll
> be just like Catholics and Protestants and Orthodox - each do their own thing.
>
> Vale, Octavius.
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79748 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2010-08-25
Subject: Re: INVITATION CONVENTVS NOVAE ROMAE NORTH AMERICA
A. Tullia Scholastica Statiae Corneliae Aeterniae S.P.D.

> Statia Cornelia Aeternia A. Tulliae Scholasticae L. Juliae Aquilae s.p.d.
>
>
> Metellus take notes! So uh just out slight curiousity, when era of the
> empire is garb required to be in?

Not required at all, but the republic is the preferred period, or the
very early empire (Augustus...).


>Is Barbarian attire accepted?

It is at reenactment events. We have a topless male Celt at Roman Days,
and some other Celts, Greeks, what have you...


> Thats what
> I normally wear, for my Roman Re-Enacting....
>
> But something more traditional is always nice to have as well, especially in
> black and purple...

Well, black is generally viewed as mourning attire, but a certain party
reputedly wore the toga pulla even otherwise...
>
> *laughs nervously and hides*
>
>
> Vale Optime,
> Statia Aeternia

Vale, et valete.
>
> On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 5:22 PM, A. Tullia Scholastica <fororom@...
>> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> A. Tullia Scholastica L. Juliae Aquilae Statiae Corneliae Aeternae
>> quiritibus
>>
>>> bonae voluntatis S.P.D.
>>>
>>>
>>> Ave Statia Aeternia!
>>>
>>> Rota and I just finished discussing this and we are going to set a block
>> of
>>> time for Magistra's ancient clothing workshop and Rota's wife Sonia, will
>> be
>>> taking measurements for custom clothing. Of course she will be
>> completeing the
>>> creation of the garments after the conventus, but she does beautiful
>> work.
>>> Look at the Ludi Megalenses from earlier this year and she is wearing a
>> tunic
>>> that she made. If this is something you might want to do you might also
>>> consider purchasing some material you like.
>>> You will need two panels of cloth, linen is ok but fine summer wieght
>> wool
>>> will probably drape better and won't wrinkle as easy. Of course you can
>> use
>>> silk as well, raw silk is easier to take care of and ca usually be
>> handwashed.
>>> Each panel should be 45" to 52" wide (these are usually the widths you
>> will
>>> find in the store) bear in mind the width also dictates how long the
>> "sleeves"
>>> will be. The length should be your height from the neck to floor plus
>> about a
>>> foot so that when you tie it at the waist it will drape nicely and not be
>>> restricting. The Palla is a rectangular piece of material at least 5' by
>> 9'
>>> but it can be bigger for comfort.
>>>
>>> ATS: Greek and Roman clothing, like that of some other peoples, belongs
>>> to what is called the draped tradition of clothing manufacture, not the
>>> tailored tradition used in much of Western attire. There are no patterns
>> as
>>> such; clothing resembles sheets, blankets, and pillowcases which are
>> fastened
>>> and draped in various ways. As Julia says, a tunica (or khiton) is made
>> from
>>> two panels of fabric, seamed up the sides and (in the Roman tunica, and
>> some
>>> forms of the Greek khiton) across the shoulders, then hemmed at the
>> bottom.
>>> One can also cut into this and make a T-shape if desired, but the plain
>>> two-panel version is easier, and probably better for those who are
>> pneumatic
>>> or chunky. In the latter case at least, I would try to get 56 inch fabric
>> (or
>>> wider if possible). Vertically pleated crinkle cotton is fine for the
>> khiton
>>> (cotton-poly is okay unless one is a reenactor), and plain cotton or
>> linen or
>>> cotton/linen mixed is fine for the Roman women�s tunica, as is silk. The
>> men
>>> use wool, and the women can do the same if desired. The short men�s
>> khiton or
>>> men�s tunica should fall to about mid-calf to the ankle when ungirt (and
>> the
>>> Roman version at least was almost always girt), and the long khiton or
>> women�s
>>> tunica should be at least floor length; the long khiton (worn by women,
>>> deities, musicians, charioteers, and older men) had to be at least one
>> foot
>>> longer than the wearer, and longer is better as multiple belts / ties
>> were
>>> used. If one cannot find fabric wide enough that two panels will work
>> (say
>>> one meter or a bit wider, perhaps 42 inches), one would have to use three
>>> panels and split the third vertically, then sew it to the other two, one
>>> section on each side so that it is even. The himation can be narrower,
>> and so
>>> can the Greek capes, the chlamys and the chlaina; methinks that one would
>> have
>>> to be quite tall to require a wide fabric even for the palla / pallium.
>> To
>>> me, five feet wide would be overkill. The himation seems fine with maybe
>> two
>>> to three yards (or meters) of 40-45 inch fabric, though this will depend
>> on
>>> the size of the wearer, and the chlamys / chlaina requires even less,
>> maybe
>>> two yards / meters.
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> I hope Livia and Magistra see this so they can add to, or correct, what I
>> just
>>> told you:)
>>>
>>> ATS: Magistra did see it...hope this helps.
>>
>>>
>>> Now you should join the info group - and then start a new thread and post
>> this
>>> under "Roman Clothing" *laughs*
>>>
>>> Vale bene,
>>>
>>> Julia
>>>
>>>
>>> Vale, et valete.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com <Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com> <mailto:
>> Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com <Nova-Roma%2540yahoogroups.com>> , Belle
>>
>>> Morte Statia <syrenslullaby@...> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Ave Iulia Aquila!
>>>>>
>>>>> Hmmm... If anyone knows where I can find patterns for Roman/Greek
>> attire
>>>>> possibly I could ask our resident Tailor Metellus to concot something
>> for
>>>>> Aeternia (if I ask very very nicely). But not sure if I can request
>> the
>>>>> time off or find a traveling companion to accompany me, it would be
>> nice
>>>> to
>>>>> have Kitabear with me but so many people and my beloved hound, he'd be
>> all
>>>>> over the place lol.
>>>>>
>>>>> Now that I see you also have dancing girls, I must say Julia and Rota
>> do
>>>>> know how to put on a shindig..
>>>>>
>>>>> I shall look into the matter more so that I may be able to attend.
>>>>>
>>>>> Vale Optime,
>>>>> Aeternia
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 11:53 AM, luciaiuliaaquila <
>>>>> luciaiuliaaquila@...> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Ave Statia Aeternia!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Very important questions!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The status on garb is that we should all wear some:)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> It would be great for all of us to be able to dress in Roman
>> clothing
>> and
>>>>>>> my personal goal it to at least sell my wares wearing a tunica or
>>>>> khiton. We
>>>>>>> shall see, time may not be on my side.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Currently we are coordinating with Scholastica to do a presentation
>> on
>>>>>>> ancient clothing but she can tell you how to make a tunica or
>> khiton
>>>>>>> etc.(they are easy, even stitched by hand) I am opting for a
>> khiton, I
>>>>> hope.
>>>>>>> Rota's wife makes wonderful Roman clothing but I am not sure she
>> will
>>>>> have
>>>>>>> time to do anything before the conventus - however she might could
>> get
>>>>> your
>>>>>>> measurements and make something for you, but I am not sure - I will
>> ask
>>>>> her.
>>>>>>> If you would like to volunteer to check about the internet and
>> maybe >>>
>> help
>>>>>>> get a Roman clothing vendor to come that will earn you "Rota
>> bucks".
>>>>>>> We will have a display of shield and sword and of course we have
>> some
>>>>> folks
>>>>>>> from various legios. I will be bringing a couple of "personal"
>> weapons
>>>>>>> myself. I have a few replicas as well that are not the best but I
>> am
>>>>>>> bringing them - the best will be brought by Rota and other
>> legionairres.
>>>>>>> As for curvesque figures - I am thankful for Roman clothing!
>> LaWren's
>>>>> nest
>>>>>>> finally has put up some new clothing and has some for we more
>> voluptuous
>>>>>>> types. http://www.lawrensnest.com/roman.html
>>>>>>> If you come I do hope you plan to take advantage of the open forum
>> and
>>>>> read
>>>>>>> an appropriate poem or two:)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Vale,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Julia
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> <syrenslullaby@> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Statia Aeternia Iuliae Aquilae sal:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Wow this looks like you all will have a blast for sure! What's
>> the
>>>>>> status
>>>>>>>>> on garb? Will you have vendors there who specialize in Roman
>> Clothing
>> and
>>>>>>>>> Weaponry? Actually the most important question, will there be
>> vendors
>> who
>>>>>>>>> specialize in Roman Clothing that cater those of the curvesque
>>>>>> nature??
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Important Questions :-)
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Vale Optime,
>>>>>>>>> Statia Aeternia
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79749 From: lathyrus77 Date: 2010-08-25
Subject: Re: the partitioning of Nova Roma.
--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "M. Octavius Gracchus" <octaviusgracchus@...> wrote:
>

> Almost certainly not. Those of us in the anti-establishment faction *loathe*
> Piscinus, and will *never* acknowledge him as PM or Augur. Cassius is our
> Pontifex Maximus, and will be until the day he dies or *voluntarily* gives up
> the office.
>


Are you roman recon?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79750 From: Belle Morte Statia Date: 2010-08-25
Subject: Re: INVITATION CONVENTVS NOVAE ROMAE NORTH AMERICA
Salve,

You know for some reason I assumed "dancing girls" but hey bare chested male
fire dacers works just as well, if they are the ones like at Burning Man and
the goth clubs in Denver, this is indeed a sight to behold!

Pax,
Aeternia



On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 7:43 PM, luciaiuliaaquila <
luciaiuliaaquila@...> wrote:

>
>
> Ave Gaia Maria,
>
> If the promise of bare chested male fire dancers won't get her from the
> North Country I do not know what will....
>
> *laughs*
>
> Vale,
>
> Julia
>
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com <Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com>, "C.Maria
> Caeca" <c.mariacaeca@...> wrote:
> >
> > Maria Caeca Liviae Ocellae sal,
> >
> > Oh, yes ...you may be passing up a once in a life time opportunity!!!
> >
> > (if I say that often and in various ways ...with logs of emphasis, think
> we can lure her to SC, Julia?)
> >
> > Actually, I would like to reinforce Julia's invitation ...wait ...let me
> remember my Southern ..."all ya'all come, you hear me?"
> >
> > Seriously, this conventus looks to be truly awesome ...and, if Julia and
> Rota don't make me carry them around *too* much ...I *promise* we will, at
> some point, sit around the fire and ...sing Cum bi ya! LOL, and I can
> promise this ...because I'll start it! (evil grin), and now ...I need to run
> away, very quickly ...and work on um lecture notes, I think. Or ...?
> >
> > Valete quam optime,
> > Caeca
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
>
>
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79751 From: luciaiuliaaquila Date: 2010-08-25
Subject: Re: INVITATION CONVENTVS NOVAE ROMAE NORTH AMERICA
Ave,

Oh there will be dancing girls as well...

Vale

Julia


--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Belle Morte Statia <syrenslullaby@...> wrote:
>
> Salve,
>
> You know for some reason I assumed "dancing girls" but hey bare chested male
> fire dacers works just as well, if they are the ones like at Burning Man and
> the goth clubs in Denver, this is indeed a sight to behold!
>
> Pax,
> Aeternia
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79752 From: Belle Morte Statia Date: 2010-08-25
Subject: Re: INVITATION CONVENTVS NOVAE ROMAE NORTH AMERICA
Aeternia Iulia Aquila sal,


Well I don't want to be the oddball out, is there a local Barbarian Horde
within that area? If so have they been invited?

Anyone notice that Aeternia suddenly has 20 million questions about this?

90% percent of my closet is "black" attire, so me not wearing it is like a
foreign concept in my brain lol.... But I think purple will go well so I
don't look to gloomy.


Vale,
Aeternia

On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 7:33 PM, luciaiuliaaquila <
luciaiuliaaquila@...> wrote:

>
>
> Iulia Aeterniae Magistrae S.P.D.
>
> Thank you Magistra, I am moving this thread to the info group:)
>
>
> >So uh just out slight curiousity, when era of the
> > empire is garb required to be in?
>
> Statia Aeternia *slow smile* The Republic. Don't worry about it too much,
> let your inner barbarian shine!
> I have no problem with black and purple:)
>
> I will not be dressed in "period" the entire time:)
>
> Valete bene,
>
> Julia
>
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com <Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com>, Belle
> Morte Statia <syrenslullaby@...> wrote:
> >
> > Statia Cornelia Aeternia A. Tulliae Scholasticae L. Juliae Aquilae s.p.d.
> >
> >
> > Metellus take notes! So uh just out slight curiousity, when era of the
> > empire is garb required to be in? Is Barbarian attire accepted? Thats
> what
> > I normally wear, for my Roman Re-Enacting....
> >
> > But something more traditional is always nice to have as well, especially
> in
> > black and purple...
> >
> > *laughs nervously and hides*
> >
> >
> > Vale Optime,
> > Statia Aeternia
> >
>
>
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79753 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2010-08-25
Subject: Re: INVITATION CONVENTVS NOVAE ROMAE NORTH AMERICA
>
>
> A. Tullia Scholastica Cn. Liviae Ocellae quiritibus bonae voluntatis S.P.D.
>
>
> Cn. Livia Ocella A. Tulliae Scholasticae S.P.D.,
>
> Ah, your offer is tempting.
>
> ATS: Good.
>
>
> I will have to think on it very deeply, and also consult my parents - I still
> live under their roof, and, as my pater says, his roof = his rules. He has
> already decided that he will not stop me from taking off to Rome next February
> (a trip I planned without his knowledge - he was not impressed),
>
> ATS: That¹s a lot wilder than this little adventure.
>
>
> but it will take some convincing in this case, especially as he and my mother
> are both very mistrustful of anything involving people one might meet on the
> Internet (needlessly mistrustful, of course, but the evening news with all its
> shock tactics has proven effective on them).
>
> ATS: While I agree that some degree of mistrust is justified in the case
> of those in chatrooms and networking sites, that is not necessarily the case
> with the rest of us. We suburbanites are a pretty safe lot. I shall try to
> reach you privatim on this as well. The evening news does tend to instill
> paranoia in the susceptible. One must steer between Scylla and Charybdis,
> between unjustified paranoia and what one of my education professors termed
> rapanoia: the absence of paranoia when fully justified. Besides, you are
> over 18, nonne? Could one of your parents drive you here, and meet with me?
>
>
> Optime vale,
> Livia Ocella
>
>
> Optime vale et valete.
>
>
>
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com <mailto:Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com> , "A.
> Tullia Scholastica" <fororom@...> wrote:
>> >
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > > A. Tullia Scholastica Cn. Liviae Ocellae quiritibus bonae voluntatis
>>> S.P.D.
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > > Cn. Livia Ocella L. Iuliae Aquilae omnibus SPD,
>>> > >
>>> > > This sounds like a wonderful event! Unfortunately I cannot attend for a
>>> couple
>>> > > of reasons (busy time of the school year, as well as it being Canadian
>>> > > Thanksgiving weekend),
>>> > >
>>> > > ATS: And the US Columbus Day weekend, which means that schools,
>>> banks,
>>> > > and government offices are closed in both countries. Ocella, if you
>>> could get
>>> > > yourself here (i.e., about 90 miles south of your location), I could
>>> take you
>>> > > the rest of the way as I will be driving (if I can attend). If
>>> interested,
>>> > > you could write to me privately.
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > > but how frequent are events like this held? I would love to attend a
>>> conventus
>>> > > in future if possible, but I worry that I am passing up a rare chance in
>>> this
>>> > > case.
>>> > >
>>> > > ATS: We had an aborted attempt at a North American conventus a few
>>> years
>>> > > back, located more or less centrally in the US, but the onsite person
had
>>> > > apparently never organized anything and the event never got off the
>>> ground.
>>> > > Last year we had a small one in Nashville. Europe supposedly has one
>>> every
>>> > > year, but it has been several years since they actually did have one;
>>> the last
>>> > > two were cancelled. This one will be at Rota¹s Roman bed and breakfast,
>>> with
>>> > > Roman food. That is why the site was chosen. It would be worth your
>>> while to
>>> > > pass up a day or so of school, and even Canadian Thanksgiving to attend
>>> this.
>>> > > In any case, you would not HAVE to be present on Monday, the actual
>>> Canadian
>>> > > Thanksgiving...you could leave earlier, though I would stay.
>>> > >
>>> > > Optime vale et valete,
>>> > > Ocella
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > > Optime vale et valete.
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com <mailto:Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com>
>>> <mailto:Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com> ,
>>> > > "luciaiuliaaquila" <luciaiuliaaquila@> wrote:
>>>>> > >> >
>>>>> > >> > Salve, et salvete,
>>>>> > >> >
>>>>> > >> > To all Novi Romani, all without exception, I ask you to please plan
>>>>> to come
>>>> > >> to this event; we must come together and get to know each other away
>>>> from the
>>>> > >> ML.
>>>>> > >> > We must put our heads together in meetings and enjoyable
>>>>> activities,
>>>> > >> planned and impromptu, as Romans and work towards pulling our
>>>> Respublica from
>>>> > >> the depths in which She now wallows.
>>>>> > >> >
>>>>> > >> > We must put all animosity aside, or at least apply strong virtues
>>>>> and work
>>>> > >> through it.
>>>>> > >> > I am not expecting us to hold hands around the campfire and sing
>>>>> kumbaya -
>>>> > >> although with enough Mulsum this could happen but I warn you, should
this
>>>> > >> occur, I *will* document it with photos:)
>>>>> > >> > I do expect as adults with a common interest we will find that
>>>>> commonality
>>>> > >> that will bind us together as Romans and we will come to a place where
>>>> we can
>>>> > >> all move forward towards a Res publica we can all be proud to be a
>>>> part of.
>>>>> > >> >
>>>>> > >> > I cannot think of one Nova Roman citizen who I would not want to
>>>>> meet and
>>>> > >> engage in a discussion with.
>>>>> > >> > Certainly there are many I could learn a great deal from, as well
>>>>> as those
>>>> > >> who I may form a close bond of friendship with.
>>>>> > >> >
>>>>> > >> > It's time citizens, esp. those citizens in North America - I am
>>>>> asking this
>>>> > >> of you Canada and Mexico as well - make your travel plans to join us
>>>> in South
>>>> > >> Carolina in six weeks.
>>>>> > >> > More info here, including a link to the Conventus yahoo ML:
>>>>> > >> > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma/message/79658
>>>>> > >> >
>>>>> > >> > I also would like to take this moment to extend to those Novi
Romani
>>>> > >> outside of North America to come and join us if you can. Airfares will
be
>>>> > >> less expensive at that time of the year and there are many deals going
on
>>>> > >> now. Free camping onsite is available and select members of the
>>>> Provincia
>>>> > >> Cohors and Aedilician Cohors will assist you with lodging should you
>>>> not wish
>>>> > >> to camp.
>>>>> > >> >
>>>>> > >> > The Conventus promises to be a wonderful event even though Rota and
I may
>>>> > >> be so exhausted by the time of its commencement that we may have to be
>>>> > >> carried about on lecticae:,)
>>>>> > >> >
>>>>> > >> > Thank you Maior for the kind words.
>>>>> > >> >
>>>>> > >> > Thank you all Novi Romani for taking a few moments to read this
post.
>>>>> > >> >
>>>>> > >> > Vale optime,
>>>>> > >> >
>>>>> > >> > L. Iulia Aquila
>>>>> > >> > Ædilis Curulis Novæ Romæ
>>>>> > >> >
>>>>> > >> >
>>>>> > >> >
>>>>> > >> >
>>>>> > >> >
>>>>> > >> > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
>>>>> <mailto:Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com> <mailto:Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com>
,
>>>> > >> "rory12001" <rory12001@> wrote:
>>>>>>> > >>> > >
>>>>>>> > >>> > > Euge! Julia;
>>>>>>> > >>> > > this is what it's all about. You and Rota are fantastic
>>>>>>> I've bought
>>>>> > >>> my tickets and I'll be there:) See you all fellow Novi Romani!
>>>>>>> > >>> > > optime valete
>>>>>>> > >>> > > Maior
>>>>>>> > >>> > >
>>>>> > >> >
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > >
>> >



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79754 From: petronius_dexter Date: 2010-08-26
Subject: Re: the partitioning of Nova Roma.
Ave,

The dissolution was already proposed in ancient Roma but did not work. I think that it is a false good idea.

Why a such dissolution? Division of the treasury in two equal parts, with many citizens who would be in the both Novae Romae.

This division need is only political and seems to me a stupidity. If the hybris of one man who wants to be the master of NR is the cause of this division, you will have the same problem with two Novae Romae. Instead of one master, you will have two masters with new need of divisions into each future Nova Roma and then we will have 4 Novae Romae, and so on...

If someone is not happy here he can quit.

Valete.

C. Petronius Dexter
Tribunus Plebis Arcoiali scribebat
a. d. VII Kalendas Septembres P. Memmio K. Fabio II coss.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79755 From: fauxrari Date: 2010-08-26
Subject: Re: INVITATION CONVENTVS NOVAE ROMAE NORTH AMERICA
Alas, Julia!
We spent our time on the Easternly side for the annual Ft.Lafe AD 43 re-enactment event this year (you are now safe from Celts for another year) and we now save are aureii for other important newlywed endeavors such as the purchase of a villa, the planting of a vineyard, procurement of freedman and slaves, etc. How may I contact your esteemed Rota? Albiet of the fairer sex, I and my dear husband are quite the seasoned veterans.
Vale,
L. Antonia Auriga

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "luciaiuliaaquila" <luciaiuliaaquila@...> wrote:
>
> Salve Lucia Antonia!
>
> Oh I know Bakersfield! Now the Roman thing to do would be to get a caravan and pick up citizens along the way! Or you can go to tripadvisor and give them your destination and the notify you of cheap fares into the wilds of South Carolina.
> We will miss you - but I am sure we will post many photos!
> As for the legios - I leave that up to Rota because i am essentially lost when it comes to that but send him an email, he loves to talk Military and would appreciate it.
>
> Thank you for the kind wished
>
> Vale bene,
>
> Julia
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "fauxrari" <drivergirl@> wrote:
> >
> > Salve, L. Iulia Aquila!
> >
> > I wish you the best in this endeavor! I live in the far, far middle of nowhere (Bakersfield, CA) and cannot make it out this time. I wish you and the rest of your NR guests well. I hope and know this will be a spectacular event!
> >
> > Best wishes,
> >
> > L. Antonia Auriga
> >
> > P.S. Just wondering if you were working with one of the many Legions on the East coast?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79756 From: rory12001 Date: 2010-08-26
Subject: Re: INVITATION CONVENTVS NOVAE ROMAE NORTH AMERICA
Maior Aeterniae Scholasticaeque spd;
the toga pulla was also worn by Roman pythagoreans, so it marks you out as a vegetarian. Nigidius Figulus and Vatinus & other outre types wore them. If I have the time & find nice fabric I might have one made up.
wear purple or whatever colour you like, it's not a big issue. Unless you're wearing a toga.
valete
Maior


>
> Well, black is generally viewed as mourning attire, but a certain party
> reputedly wore the toga pulla even otherwise...
> >
> > *laughs nervously and hides*
> >
> >
> > Vale Optime,
> > Statia Aeternia
>
> Vale, et valete.
> >
> > On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 5:22 PM, A. Tullia Scholastica <fororom@...
> >> wrote:
> >
> >>
> >>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> A. Tullia Scholastica L. Juliae Aquilae Statiae Corneliae Aeternae
> >> quiritibus
> >>
> >>> bonae voluntatis S.P.D.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Ave Statia Aeternia!
> >>>
> >>> Rota and I just finished discussing this and we are going to set a block
> >> of
> >>> time for Magistra's ancient clothing workshop and Rota's wife Sonia, will
> >> be
> >>> taking measurements for custom clothing. Of course she will be
> >> completeing the
> >>> creation of the garments after the conventus, but she does beautiful
> >> work.
> >>> Look at the Ludi Megalenses from earlier this year and she is wearing a
> >> tunic
> >>> that she made. If this is something you might want to do you might also
> >>> consider purchasing some material you like.
> >>> You will need two panels of cloth, linen is ok but fine summer wieght
> >> wool
> >>> will probably drape better and won't wrinkle as easy. Of course you can
> >> use
> >>> silk as well, raw silk is easier to take care of and ca usually be
> >> handwashed.
> >>> Each panel should be 45" to 52" wide (these are usually the widths you
> >> will
> >>> find in the store) bear in mind the width also dictates how long the
> >> "sleeves"
> >>> will be. The length should be your height from the neck to floor plus
> >> about a
> >>> foot so that when you tie it at the waist it will drape nicely and not be
> >>> restricting. The Palla is a rectangular piece of material at least 5' by
> >> 9'
> >>> but it can be bigger for comfort.
> >>>
> >>> ATS: Greek and Roman clothing, like that of some other peoples, belongs
> >>> to what is called the draped tradition of clothing manufacture, not the
> >>> tailored tradition used in much of Western attire. There are no patterns
> >> as
> >>> such; clothing resembles sheets, blankets, and pillowcases which are
> >> fastened
> >>> and draped in various ways. As Julia says, a tunica (or khiton) is made
> >> from
> >>> two panels of fabric, seamed up the sides and (in the Roman tunica, and
> >> some
> >>> forms of the Greek khiton) across the shoulders, then hemmed at the
> >> bottom.
> >>> One can also cut into this and make a T-shape if desired, but the plain
> >>> two-panel version is easier, and probably better for those who are
> >> pneumatic
> >>> or chunky. In the latter case at least, I would try to get 56 inch fabric
> >> (or
> >>> wider if possible). Vertically pleated crinkle cotton is fine for the
> >> khiton
> >>> (cotton-poly is okay unless one is a reenactor), and plain cotton or
> >> linen or
> >>> cotton/linen mixed is fine for the Roman women�s tunica, as is silk. The
> >> men
> >>> use wool, and the women can do the same if desired. The short men�s
> >> khiton or
> >>> men�s tunica should fall to about mid-calf to the ankle when ungirt (and
> >> the
> >>> Roman version at least was almost always girt), and the long khiton or
> >> women�s
> >>> tunica should be at least floor length; the long khiton (worn by women,
> >>> deities, musicians, charioteers, and older men) had to be at least one
> >> foot
> >>> longer than the wearer, and longer is better as multiple belts / ties
> >> were
> >>> used. If one cannot find fabric wide enough that two panels will work
> >> (say
> >>> one meter or a bit wider, perhaps 42 inches), one would have to use three
> >>> panels and split the third vertically, then sew it to the other two, one
> >>> section on each side so that it is even. The himation can be narrower,
> >> and so
> >>> can the Greek capes, the chlamys and the chlaina; methinks that one would
> >> have
> >>> to be quite tall to require a wide fabric even for the palla / pallium.
> >> To
> >>> me, five feet wide would be overkill. The himation seems fine with maybe
> >> two
> >>> to three yards (or meters) of 40-45 inch fabric, though this will depend
> >> on
> >>> the size of the wearer, and the chlamys / chlaina requires even less,
> >> maybe
> >>> two yards / meters.
> >>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> I hope Livia and Magistra see this so they can add to, or correct, what I
> >> just
> >>> told you:)
> >>>
> >>> ATS: Magistra did see it...hope this helps.
> >>
> >>>
> >>> Now you should join the info group - and then start a new thread and post
> >> this
> >>> under "Roman Clothing" *laughs*
> >>>
> >>> Vale bene,
> >>>
> >>> Julia
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Vale, et valete.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com <Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com> <mailto:
> >> Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com <Nova-Roma%2540yahoogroups.com>> , Belle
> >>
> >>> Morte Statia <syrenslullaby@> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Ave Iulia Aquila!
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Hmmm... If anyone knows where I can find patterns for Roman/Greek
> >> attire
> >>>>> possibly I could ask our resident Tailor Metellus to concot something
> >> for
> >>>>> Aeternia (if I ask very very nicely). But not sure if I can request
> >> the
> >>>>> time off or find a traveling companion to accompany me, it would be
> >> nice
> >>>> to
> >>>>> have Kitabear with me but so many people and my beloved hound, he'd be
> >> all
> >>>>> over the place lol.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Now that I see you also have dancing girls, I must say Julia and Rota
> >> do
> >>>>> know how to put on a shindig..
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I shall look into the matter more so that I may be able to attend.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Vale Optime,
> >>>>> Aeternia
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 11:53 AM, luciaiuliaaquila <
> >>>>> luciaiuliaaquila@> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Ave Statia Aeternia!
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Very important questions!
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> The status on garb is that we should all wear some:)
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> It would be great for all of us to be able to dress in Roman
> >> clothing
> >> and
> >>>>>>> my personal goal it to at least sell my wares wearing a tunica or
> >>>>> khiton. We
> >>>>>>> shall see, time may not be on my side.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Currently we are coordinating with Scholastica to do a presentation
> >> on
> >>>>>>> ancient clothing but she can tell you how to make a tunica or
> >> khiton
> >>>>>>> etc.(they are easy, even stitched by hand) I am opting for a
> >> khiton, I
> >>>>> hope.
> >>>>>>> Rota's wife makes wonderful Roman clothing but I am not sure she
> >> will
> >>>>> have
> >>>>>>> time to do anything before the conventus - however she might could
> >> get
> >>>>> your
> >>>>>>> measurements and make something for you, but I am not sure - I will
> >> ask
> >>>>> her.
> >>>>>>> If you would like to volunteer to check about the internet and
> >> maybe >>>
> >> help
> >>>>>>> get a Roman clothing vendor to come that will earn you "Rota
> >> bucks".
> >>>>>>> We will have a display of shield and sword and of course we have
> >> some
> >>>>> folks
> >>>>>>> from various legios. I will be bringing a couple of "personal"
> >> weapons
> >>>>>>> myself. I have a few replicas as well that are not the best but I
> >> am
> >>>>>>> bringing them - the best will be brought by Rota and other
> >> legionairres.
> >>>>>>> As for curvesque figures - I am thankful for Roman clothing!
> >> LaWren's
> >>>>> nest
> >>>>>>> finally has put up some new clothing and has some for we more
> >> voluptuous
> >>>>>>> types. http://www.lawrensnest.com/roman.html
> >>>>>>> If you come I do hope you plan to take advantage of the open forum
> >> and
> >>>>> read
> >>>>>>> an appropriate poem or two:)
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Vale,
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Julia
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> <syrenslullaby@> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Statia Aeternia Iuliae Aquilae sal:
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Wow this looks like you all will have a blast for sure! What's
> >> the
> >>>>>> status
> >>>>>>>>> on garb? Will you have vendors there who specialize in Roman
> >> Clothing
> >> and
> >>>>>>>>> Weaponry? Actually the most important question, will there be
> >> vendors
> >> who
> >>>>>>>>> specialize in Roman Clothing that cater those of the curvesque
> >>>>>> nature??
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Important Questions :-)
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Vale Optime,
> >>>>>>>>> Statia Aeternia
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >>>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------------
> >
> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79757 From: eagled2 Date: 2010-08-26
Subject: Re: A Facebook clone for Nova Roma
Once all the features listed on the reported issues this site will be very useful. I didn't know about the other one but it will be nice to have one centered around the Nova Romans. Who knows since no one seems to be interested in a forum maybe this will catch on. It doesn't keep messages as organized but it does create a way for more personalized communication and that, I think is important.

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Gaius Lucretius Seneca <c.lucretius.seneca@...> wrote:
>
> C. Lucretius Seneca omnibus civibus S.P.D.
>
> Salvete omnes! I'm a new civis, having passed my citizenship test a
> couple of weeks ago. Throughout my probationary citizenship period,
> I've been thinking about ways I could use my skills as a website
> developer to help Nova Roma, and I've spent the last few weeks cooking
> something up for you guys.
>
> I suppose the subject line gave it away - I built a minimalistic
> Facebook clone for Nova Roma. It only has a very basic set of features,
> by design - it's important to have a strong foundation before adding all
> the bells and whistles. It still needs a lot of work but I think it's
> ready for people to start using. (What it needs most at this point is a
> better name!)
>
> The site is at http://nrfb.korsoft.com/ - email me if you have problems
> signing up or logging in.
>
> Thanks, and I hope to see you all on the site!
>
> Valete,
> Seneca
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79758 From: Publius Ullerius Stephanus Venator Date: 2010-08-26
Subject: Conventus - RSVP...
The taste of the wine has soured
By the sight of some at the table
My eyes shrink away
But the image remains
Once a guest, I now must away...
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79759 From: marcushoratius Date: 2010-08-26
Subject: a. d. VII Kalendas Septembris: Massinissa and Sophonisba
M. Moravius Piscinus Pontifex Maximus, Quiritibus, cultoribus Deorum et omnibus salutem plurimam dicit: Diis bene iuvantibus sitis

Hodie est ante diem VII Kalendas Septembris; haec dies comitialis est:

The tragic love of Masinissa and Sophonisba

As a young Numidian prince Masinissa had served with the Carthaginians in Spain against Rome. In north Africa, Hasdrubal, son of Gesco (not Hannibal's brother) tried to seal the alliance between his city and eastern Numidia by betrothal of his daughter Sophonisba to Masinissa. But when the king of the Numidians died, Masinissa was deprived of his throne by Syphax of the western Numidians. Masinissa managed to escape with only two-hundred horsemen. He went on to ally himself with Publius Cornelius Scipio. Meanwhile Sophonisba was then married to Syphax. With Masinissa's help Scipio was able defeat the Carthaginians and establish a base in north Africa. A detachment under Gaius Laelius and Masinissa defeated Hasdrubal and Syphax. Then Masinissa and his cavalry advanced on Cirta, which city surrendered to the Romans once the town elders were shown Syphax in chains.

"As he was entering the vestibule, on the very threshold in fact, he was met by Sophonisba, the wife of Syphax and daughter of the Carthaginian Hasdrubal. When she saw him surrounded by an armed escort, and conspicuous by his arms and general appearance, she rightly guessed that he was the king, and throwing herself at his feet, exclaimed: 'Your courage and good fortune aided by the gods have given you absolute power over us. But if a captive may utter words of supplication before one who is master of her fate, if she may touch his victorious right hand, then I pray and beseech you ... do not leave me to fall under the cruel tyranny of a Roman. ... If no other way is possible then I implore you to save me by death from falling into Roman hands.' Sophonisba was in the bloom of youth and in all the splendour of her beauty, and as she held Masinissa's hand and begged him to give his word that she should not be surrendered to the Romans, her tone became one of blandishment rather than entreaty. A slave to passion like all his countrymen, the victor at once fell in love with his captive. He gave her his solemn assurance that he would do what she wished him to do and then retired into the palace. Here he considered in what way he could redeem his promise, and as he saw no practical way of doing so he allowed his passion to dictate to him as a method equally reckless and indecent. Without a moment's delay he made preparations for celebrating his nuptials on that very day, so that neither Laelius nor Scipio might be free to treat as a prisoner one who was now Masinissa's wife. When the marriage ceremony was over Laelius appeared on the scene, and, far from concealing his disapproval of what had been done, he actually attempted to drag her from her bridegroom's arms and send her with Syphax and the other prisoners to Scipio. However, Masinissa's remonstrances so far prevailed that it was left to Scipio to decide which of the two kings should be the happy possessor of Sophonisba."

When Syphax was brought to the Roman camp and Scipio questioned him on why he had broken his alliance with Rome and had joined with the Carthaginians, Syphax "admitted that he had done wrong and behaved like a madman but his taking up arms against Rome was not the beginning of his madness, it was the last act. He first exhibited his folly, his utter disregard of all private ties and public obligations, when he admitted a Carthaginian bride into his house. The torches which illuminated these nuptials had set his palace in a blaze. That fury of a woman, that scourge, had used every endearment to alienate and warp his feelings, and would not rest till she had with her own impious hands armed him against his host and friend. However, broken and ruined as he was, he had this to console him in his misery-that pestilential fury had entered the household of his bitterest foe – Masinissa."

When Scipio learned of Sophonisba's marriage to Masinissa he sent for the prince and reminded him that she was a prisoner of Rome. Believing what Syphax had said about her, that she was the women responsible for turning an ally against Rome, Scipio claimed that her fate must be decided by the Roman Senate. Masinissa returned to his tent in despair of being unable to keep his vow to his wife.

"At last with a deep groan he called one of his slaves in whom he placed complete confidence and who had in his keeping the poison which kings usually have in reserve against the vicissitudes of Fortune. After mixing it in a cup he told him to take it to Sophonisba, and at the same time tell her that Masinissa would have gladly fulfilled the first promise that he made to his wife, but as those who have the power were depriving him of the right to do so, he was fulfilling the second-that she should not fall into the hands of the Romans alive. The thought of her father, her country, and the two kings who had wedded her would decide her how to act. When the servant came with the poison and the message to Sophonisba, she said, 'I accept this wedding gift, no unwelcome one if my husband can do nothing more for his wife. But tell him that I should have died more happily had not my marriage bed stood so near my grave.' The high spirit of these words was sustained by the fearless way in which, without the slightest sign of trepidation, she drank the potion." ~ Titus Livius 30.12-15


Today's thought is from Stobaeus, Ethical Sentences 11 and 12:

"Remind yourself that all men assert that wisdom is the greatest good, but that there are few who strenuously endeavor to obtain this greatest good. When the wise man opens his mouth, the beauties of his soul present themselves to view like the statues in a temple."
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79760 From: L. Livia Plauta Date: 2010-08-26
Subject: Re: INVITATION CONVENTVS NOVAE ROMAE NORTH AMERICA
L. Livia Plauta omnibus sal.

I did see this, and though I can't easily interpret the measurements given
in body parts, it looks all right to me.
I suppose by "raw" silk the quality is meant that's actually cooked, so that
it can be washed without shrinking. It's very expensive, but it's one of the
best materials for pallae, because it's not slippery, like linen or cotton
(the shiny, slippery silk is the one you don't want to use).

The colors should be light pastel colors if you use vegetable fibers like
linen and cotton, but can be quite bright in the case of wool and silk,
which are a lot easier to dye with natural dyes.

And remember, black didn't exist, either for clothes or shoes. The darkest
color for clothes would be dark brown, the color of a black sheep or of the
dye obtained with walnuts.

Optime valete,
Livia


>
>
> A. Tullia Scholastica L. Juliae Aquilae Statiae Corneliae Aeternae
> quiritibus
> bonae voluntatis S.P.D.
>
>
> Ave Statia Aeternia!
>
> Rota and I just finished discussing this and we are going to set a block
> of
> time for Magistra's ancient clothing workshop and Rota's wife Sonia, will
> be
> taking measurements for custom clothing. Of course she will be completeing
> the
> creation of the garments after the conventus, but she does beautiful work.
> Look at the Ludi Megalenses from earlier this year and she is wearing a
> tunic
> that she made. If this is something you might want to do you might also
> consider purchasing some material you like.
> You will need two panels of cloth, linen is ok but fine summer wieght wool
> will probably drape better and won't wrinkle as easy. Of course you can
> use
> silk as well, raw silk is easier to take care of and ca usually be
> handwashed.
> Each panel should be 45" to 52" wide (these are usually the widths you
> will
> find in the store) bear in mind the width also dictates how long the
> "sleeves"
> will be. The length should be your height from the neck to floor plus
> about a
> foot so that when you tie it at the waist it will drape nicely and not be
> restricting. The Palla is a rectangular piece of material at least 5' by
> 9'
> but it can be bigger for comfort.
>
> ATS: Greek and Roman clothing, like that of some other peoples,
> belongs
> to what is called the draped tradition of clothing manufacture, not the
> tailored tradition used in much of Western attire. There are no patterns
> as
> such; clothing resembles sheets, blankets, and pillowcases which are
> fastened
> and draped in various ways. As Julia says, a tunica (or khiton) is made
> from
> two panels of fabric, seamed up the sides and (in the Roman tunica, and
> some
> forms of the Greek khiton) across the shoulders, then hemmed at the
> bottom.
> One can also cut into this and make a T-shape if desired, but the plain
> two-panel version is easier, and probably better for those who are
> pneumatic
> or chunky. In the latter case at least, I would try to get 56 inch fabric
> (or
> wider if possible). Vertically pleated crinkle cotton is fine for the
> khiton
> (cotton-poly is okay unless one is a reenactor), and plain cotton or linen
> or
> cotton/linen mixed is fine for the Roman women¹s tunica, as is silk. The
> men
> use wool, and the women can do the same if desired. The short men¹s
> khiton or
> men¹s tunica should fall to about mid-calf to the ankle when ungirt (and
> the
> Roman version at least was almost always girt), and the long khiton or
> women¹s
> tunica should be at least floor length; the long khiton (worn by women,
> deities, musicians, charioteers, and older men) had to be at least one
> foot
> longer than the wearer, and longer is better as multiple belts / ties were
> used. If one cannot find fabric wide enough that two panels will work
> (say
> one meter or a bit wider, perhaps 42 inches), one would have to use three
> panels and split the third vertically, then sew it to the other two, one
> section on each side so that it is even. The himation can be narrower,
> and so
> can the Greek capes, the chlamys and the chlaina; methinks that one would
> have
> to be quite tall to require a wide fabric even for the palla / pallium.
> To
> me, five feet wide would be overkill. The himation seems fine with maybe
> two
> to three yards (or meters) of 40-45 inch fabric, though this will depend
> on
> the size of the wearer, and the chlamys / chlaina requires even less,
> maybe
> two yards / meters.
>
>
> I hope Livia and Magistra see this so they can add to, or correct, what I
> just
> told you:)
>
> ATS: Magistra did see it...hope this helps.
>
> Now you should join the info group - and then start a new thread and post
> this
> under "Roman Clothing" *laughs*
>
> Vale bene,
>
> Julia
>
>
> Vale, et valete.
>
>
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com <mailto:Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com> ,
> Belle
> Morte Statia <syrenslullaby@...> wrote:
>> >
>> > Ave Iulia Aquila!
>> >
>> > Hmmm... If anyone knows where I can find patterns for Roman/Greek
>> > attire
>> > possibly I could ask our resident Tailor Metellus to concot something
>> > for
>> > Aeternia (if I ask very very nicely). But not sure if I can request
>> > the
>> > time off or find a traveling companion to accompany me, it would be
>> > nice
>> to
>> > have Kitabear with me but so many people and my beloved hound, he'd be
>> > all
>> > over the place lol.
>> >
>> > Now that I see you also have dancing girls, I must say Julia and Rota
>> > do
>> > know how to put on a shindig..
>> >
>> > I shall look into the matter more so that I may be able to attend.
>> >
>> > Vale Optime,
>> > Aeternia
>> >
>> > On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 11:53 AM, luciaiuliaaquila <
>> > luciaiuliaaquila@...> wrote:
>> >
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > > Ave Statia Aeternia!
>>> > >
>>> > > Very important questions!
>>> > >
>>> > > The status on garb is that we should all wear some:)
>>> > >
>>> > > It would be great for all of us to be able to dress in Roman
>>> > > clothing
and
>>> > > my personal goal it to at least sell my wares wearing a tunica or
>>> khiton. We
>>> > > shall see, time may not be on my side.
>>> > >
>>> > > Currently we are coordinating with Scholastica to do a presentation
>>> > > on
>>> > > ancient clothing but she can tell you how to make a tunica or khiton
>>> > > etc.(they are easy, even stitched by hand) I am opting for a khiton,
>>> > > I
>>> hope.
>>> > > Rota's wife makes wonderful Roman clothing but I am not sure she
>>> > > will
>>> have
>>> > > time to do anything before the conventus - however she might could
>>> > > get
>>> your
>>> > > measurements and make something for you, but I am not sure - I will
>>> > > ask
>>> her.
>>> > > If you would like to volunteer to check about the internet and maybe
>>> > > >>>
help
>>> > > get a Roman clothing vendor to come that will earn you "Rota bucks".
>>> > > We will have a display of shield and sword and of course we have
>>> > > some
>>> folks
>>> > > from various legios. I will be bringing a couple of "personal"
>>> > > weapons
>>> > > myself. I have a few replicas as well that are not the best but I am
>>> > > bringing them - the best will be brought by Rota and other
>>> > > legionairres.
>>> > > As for curvesque figures - I am thankful for Roman clothing!
>>> > > LaWren's
>>> nest
>>> > > finally has put up some new clothing and has some for we more
>>> > > voluptuous
>>> > > types. http://www.lawrensnest.com/roman.html
>>> > > If you come I do hope you plan to take advantage of the open forum
>>> > > and
>>> read
>>> > > an appropriate poem or two:)
>>> > >
>>> > > Vale,
>>> > >
>>> > > Julia
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > > <syrenslullaby@> wrote:
>>>> > > >
>>>> > > > Statia Aeternia Iuliae Aquilae sal:
>>>> > > >
>>>> > > >
>>>> > > > Wow this looks like you all will have a blast for sure! What's
>>>> > > > the
>>>> status
>>>> > > > on garb? Will you have vendors there who specialize in Roman
>>>> > > > Clothing
and
>>>> > > > Weaponry? Actually the most important question, will there be
>>>> > > > vendors
who
>>>> > > > specialize in Roman Clothing that cater those of the curvesque
>>>> nature??
>>>> > > >
>>>> > > > Important Questions :-)
>>>> > > >
>>>> > > > Vale Optime,
>>>> > > > Statia Aeternia
>>> > >
>>>> > > >
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > >
>> >
>> >
>> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>> >
>
>




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79761 From: L. Livia Plauta Date: 2010-08-26
Subject: Re: the partitioning of Nova Roma.
Salvete omnes,
I think Gracchus idea is wonderful and well thought-out. I'm just afraid
implementing it would require an unity we don't have at the moment. Not to
talk about the voting instruments we don't have.
But miracles can happen, ad I think this would be the best solution.

Optime valete,
Livia


> Annia Minucia Marcella wrote:
>> How would we legally divide the treasury?
>
> Quick answer: give about 10% of it to a lawyer and let them figure it out.
>
> I'm sure it's doable. The Maine statues that Maior posted earlier
> mentioned
> transfering the treasury of a nonprofit to an organization engaged in
> similar
> activities. Splitting it among *two* similar organizations shouldn't be
> difficult.
>
>> Who holds the trademarks and copyrights? Do we share copyright?
>
> I don't know if it's possible for two groups to hold the trademark
> jointly; it
> might be that one side would keep it, and would issue some sort of
> irrevocable
> license to the other.
>
> And if that's not possible, then *both* would have to change their names
> to
> something that didn't include "Nova Roma" at all. I think it's important
> that
> neither gets to claim exclusive rights to the name, for that would make
> those of
> the other group feel like they'd been banished.
>
> I think there'll be a lot of legal paperwork involved in this in any case.
>
> As for copyrights to the web site, we'd have the major contributors sign
> statements saying they allow the other group to use, modify, redistribute
> their
> content. In the free software world, there are various licenses for this,
> like
> the GFDL or Creative Commons; we'd mimic one of these.
>
> The two sides might even jointly sponsor the project to rebuild the web
> site in
> a modern framework, assuming they can agree on the requirements; the
> programmer
> would simply deliver two independent installations of the same thing.
>
>> Would we have liasons between the to sides?
>
> Oh, absolutely. There are a few people who are respected by both
> factions:
> Venator, Audens, Pompeia... whichever side they end up on, they'll make
> good
> ambassadors.
>
> I think we need a rule that one can't be in the Senate or Collegia of both
> groups simultaneously, but being an ordinary member of both shouldn't be a
> problem.
>
>> Is there a possibility for the litigious among us to wage legal battle
>> between the two groups?
>
> This is always hard to prevent (at least in America, where lawyers
> outnumber
> humans 2:1), but by removing everyone's enemies to a group that can, for
> the
> most part, be ignored, there's less opportunity for conflict.
>
> It'll be like when SVR spun away from NR. We were aware they had consuls,
> a
> Pontifex Maximus, and a Senate, but nobody really cared - out of sight,
> out of mind.
>
>> I'm assuming each side will have a PM, and preist groups.
> > Will they confer so as keep the religio whole?
>
> Almost certainly not. Those of us in the anti-establishment faction
> *loathe*
> Piscinus, and will *never* acknowledge him as PM or Augur. Cassius is our
> Pontifex Maximus, and will be until the day he dies or *voluntarily* gives
> up
> the office.
>
> No, our collegia will do our thing, the other collegia will do their
> thing, and
> they'll ignore each other. Maybe they'll read and comment on each other's
> academic papers, but that'd be the limit of cooperation.
>
> There might be some joint invocation if there's a conventus, but otherwise
> it'll
> be just like Catholics and Protestants and Orthodox - each do their own
> thing.
>
> Vale, Octavius.
>
>
>
>
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79762 From: L. Livia Plauta Date: 2010-08-26
Subject: Re: the partitioning of Nova Roma.
Salvete omnes,
I suspected the idea wouldn't be well received by all ...
It seems our newly self-appointed arbiter disagrees.

Valete,
Livia


----- Original Message -----
From: "petronius_dexter" <jfarnoud94@...>
To: <Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Thursday, August 26, 2010 6:21 AM
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: the partitioning of Nova Roma.


Ave,

The dissolution was already proposed in ancient Roma but did not work. I
think that it is a false good idea.

Why a such dissolution? Division of the treasury in two equal parts, with
many citizens who would be in the both Novae Romae.

This division need is only political and seems to me a stupidity. If the
hybris of one man who wants to be the master of NR is the cause of this
division, you will have the same problem with two Novae Romae. Instead of
one master, you will have two masters with new need of divisions into each
future Nova Roma and then we will have 4 Novae Romae, and so on...

If someone is not happy here he can quit.

Valete.

C. Petronius Dexter
Tribunus Plebis Arcoiali scribebat
a. d. VII Kalendas Septembres P. Memmio K. Fabio II coss.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79763 From: luciaiuliaaquila Date: 2010-08-26
Subject: Re: Conventus - RSVP...
Répondez, s'il vous plaît, Mater Venus


O Great Mother of the Roman people, Salute
This morning, as light on the horizon
Push'd away dark of night, offer'd
Sacrifice, prayers, guidance requested
Work blessed, potential promised
Birds sang sweetly in response,
"For you are all Roman"

Seated at a table forged by hard work
Of those who only seek to bring
Together those of varied hues and views
Here are my sisters, my brothers,
Friends and Foes, we take a chance,
We extend olive branches
For we are Roman

Forward with kind words of bright hope
Likes aside, we receive what the other
Offers, open to what is dished back
Fear controlled, our hearts are strong
With courage our minds are stronger
The experience embraced
For I am Roman


26August 2010 ® © Aquila


--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Publius Ullerius Stephanus Venator <famila.ulleria.venii@...> wrote:
>
> The taste of the wine has soured
> By the sight of some at the table
> My eyes shrink away
> But the image remains
> Once a guest, I now must away...
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79764 From: Belle Morte Statia Date: 2010-08-26
Subject: Re: INVITATION CONVENTVS NOVAE ROMAE NORTH AMERICA
Aeternia Maior Omnibus s.p.d.


Oh my days of the JCL (Junior Classical League) are long long gone...
Women do not wear Togas if I recall correctly, so neither will I.


Vale,
Aeternia

On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 11:13 PM, rory12001 <rory12001@...> wrote:

>
>
> Maior Aeterniae Scholasticaeque spd;
> the toga pulla was also worn by Roman pythagoreans, so it marks you out as
> a vegetarian. Nigidius Figulus and Vatinus & other outre types wore them. If
> I have the time & find nice fabric I might have one made up.
> wear purple or whatever colour you like, it's not a big issue. Unless
> you're wearing a toga.
> valete
> Maior
>
>
> >
> > Well, black is generally viewed as mourning attire, but a certain party
> > reputedly wore the toga pulla even otherwise...
> > >
> > > *laughs nervously and hides*
> > >
> > >
> > > Vale Optime,
> > > Statia Aeternia
> >
> > Vale, et valete.
> > >
> > > On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 5:22 PM, A. Tullia Scholastica <fororom@...
>
> > >> wrote:
> > >
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> A. Tullia Scholastica L. Juliae Aquilae Statiae Corneliae Aeternae
> > >> quiritibus
> > >>
> > >>> bonae voluntatis S.P.D.
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> Ave Statia Aeternia!
> > >>>
> > >>> Rota and I just finished discussing this and we are going to set a
> block
> > >> of
> > >>> time for Magistra's ancient clothing workshop and Rota's wife Sonia,
> will
> > >> be
> > >>> taking measurements for custom clothing. Of course she will be
> > >> completeing the
> > >>> creation of the garments after the conventus, but she does beautiful
> > >> work.
> > >>> Look at the Ludi Megalenses from earlier this year and she is wearing
> a
> > >> tunic
> > >>> that she made. If this is something you might want to do you might
> also
> > >>> consider purchasing some material you like.
> > >>> You will need two panels of cloth, linen is ok but fine summer wieght
> > >> wool
> > >>> will probably drape better and won't wrinkle as easy. Of course you
> can
> > >> use
> > >>> silk as well, raw silk is easier to take care of and ca usually be
> > >> handwashed.
> > >>> Each panel should be 45" to 52" wide (these are usually the widths
> you
> > >> will
> > >>> find in the store) bear in mind the width also dictates how long the
> > >> "sleeves"
> > >>> will be. The length should be your height from the neck to floor plus
> > >> about a
> > >>> foot so that when you tie it at the waist it will drape nicely and
> not be
> > >>> restricting. The Palla is a rectangular piece of material at least 5'
> by
> > >> 9'
> > >>> but it can be bigger for comfort.
> > >>>
> > >>> ATS: Greek and Roman clothing, like that of some other peoples,
> belongs
> > >>> to what is called the draped tradition of clothing manufacture, not
> the
> > >>> tailored tradition used in much of Western attire. There are no
> patterns
> > >> as
> > >>> such; clothing resembles sheets, blankets, and pillowcases which are
> > >> fastened
> > >>> and draped in various ways. As Julia says, a tunica (or khiton) is
> made
> > >> from
> > >>> two panels of fabric, seamed up the sides and (in the Roman tunica,
> and
> > >> some
> > >>> forms of the Greek khiton) across the shoulders, then hemmed at the
> > >> bottom.
> > >>> One can also cut into this and make a T-shape if desired, but the
> plain
> > >>> two-panel version is easier, and probably better for those who are
> > >> pneumatic
> > >>> or chunky. In the latter case at least, I would try to get 56 inch
> fabric
> > >> (or
> > >>> wider if possible). Vertically pleated crinkle cotton is fine for the
> > >> khiton
> > >>> (cotton-poly is okay unless one is a reenactor), and plain cotton or
> > >> linen or
> > >>> cotton/linen mixed is fine for the Roman women���s tunica, as is
> silk. The
> > >> men
> > >>> use wool, and the women can do the same if desired. The short men���s
> > >> khiton or
> > >>> men���s tunica should fall to about mid-calf to the ankle when ungirt
> (and
>
> > >> the
> > >>> Roman version at least was almost always girt), and the long khiton
> or
> > >> women���s
>
> > >>> tunica should be at least floor length; the long khiton (worn by
> women,
> > >>> deities, musicians, charioteers, and older men) had to be at least
> one
> > >> foot
> > >>> longer than the wearer, and longer is better as multiple belts / ties
> > >> were
> > >>> used. If one cannot find fabric wide enough that two panels will work
> > >> (say
> > >>> one meter or a bit wider, perhaps 42 inches), one would have to use
> three
> > >>> panels and split the third vertically, then sew it to the other two,
> one
> > >>> section on each side so that it is even. The himation can be
> narrower,
> > >> and so
> > >>> can the Greek capes, the chlamys and the chlaina; methinks that one
> would
> > >> have
> > >>> to be quite tall to require a wide fabric even for the palla /
> pallium.
> > >> To
> > >>> me, five feet wide would be overkill. The himation seems fine with
> maybe
> > >> two
> > >>> to three yards (or meters) of 40-45 inch fabric, though this will
> depend
> > >> on
> > >>> the size of the wearer, and the chlamys / chlaina requires even less,
> > >> maybe
> > >>> two yards / meters.
> > >>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> I hope Livia and Magistra see this so they can add to, or correct,
> what I
> > >> just
> > >>> told you:)
> > >>>
> > >>> ATS: Magistra did see it...hope this helps.
> > >>
> > >>>
> > >>> Now you should join the info group - and then start a new thread and
> post
> > >> this
> > >>> under "Roman Clothing" *laughs*
> > >>>
> > >>> Vale bene,
> > >>>
> > >>> Julia
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> Vale, et valete.
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com <Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com><Nova-Roma%
> 40yahoogroups.com> <mailto:
> > >> Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com <Nova-Roma%2540yahoogroups.com>> , Belle
> > >>
> > >>> Morte Statia <syrenslullaby@> wrote:
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Ave Iulia Aquila!
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Hmmm... If anyone knows where I can find patterns for Roman/Greek
> > >> attire
> > >>>>> possibly I could ask our resident Tailor Metellus to concot
> something
> > >> for
> > >>>>> Aeternia (if I ask very very nicely). But not sure if I can request
> > >> the
> > >>>>> time off or find a traveling companion to accompany me, it would be
> > >> nice
> > >>>> to
> > >>>>> have Kitabear with me but so many people and my beloved hound, he'd
> be
> > >> all
> > >>>>> over the place lol.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Now that I see you also have dancing girls, I must say Julia and
> Rota
> > >> do
> > >>>>> know how to put on a shindig..
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> I shall look into the matter more so that I may be able to attend.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Vale Optime,
> > >>>>> Aeternia
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 11:53 AM, luciaiuliaaquila <
> > >>>>> luciaiuliaaquila@> wrote:
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> Ave Statia Aeternia!
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> Very important questions!
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> The status on garb is that we should all wear some:)
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> It would be great for all of us to be able to dress in Roman
> > >> clothing
> > >> and
> > >>>>>>> my personal goal it to at least sell my wares wearing a tunica or
> > >>>>> khiton. We
> > >>>>>>> shall see, time may not be on my side.
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> Currently we are coordinating with Scholastica to do a
> presentation
> > >> on
> > >>>>>>> ancient clothing but she can tell you how to make a tunica or
> > >> khiton
> > >>>>>>> etc.(they are easy, even stitched by hand) I am opting for a
> > >> khiton, I
> > >>>>> hope.
> > >>>>>>> Rota's wife makes wonderful Roman clothing but I am not sure she
> > >> will
> > >>>>> have
> > >>>>>>> time to do anything before the conventus - however she might
> could
> > >> get
> > >>>>> your
> > >>>>>>> measurements and make something for you, but I am not sure - I
> will
> > >> ask
> > >>>>> her.
> > >>>>>>> If you would like to volunteer to check about the internet and
> > >> maybe >>>
> > >> help
> > >>>>>>> get a Roman clothing vendor to come that will earn you "Rota
> > >> bucks".
> > >>>>>>> We will have a display of shield and sword and of course we have
> > >> some
> > >>>>> folks
> > >>>>>>> from various legios. I will be bringing a couple of "personal"
> > >> weapons
> > >>>>>>> myself. I have a few replicas as well that are not the best but I
> > >> am
> > >>>>>>> bringing them - the best will be brought by Rota and other
> > >> legionairres.
> > >>>>>>> As for curvesque figures - I am thankful for Roman clothing!
> > >> LaWren's
> > >>>>> nest
> > >>>>>>> finally has put up some new clothing and has some for we more
> > >> voluptuous
> > >>>>>>> types. http://www.lawrensnest.com/roman.html
> > >>>>>>> If you come I do hope you plan to take advantage of the open
> forum
> > >> and
> > >>>>> read
> > >>>>>>> an appropriate poem or two:)
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> Vale,
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> Julia
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> <syrenslullaby@> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> Statia Aeternia Iuliae Aquilae sal:
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> Wow this looks like you all will have a blast for sure! What's
> > >> the
> > >>>>>> status
> > >>>>>>>>> on garb? Will you have vendors there who specialize in Roman
> > >> Clothing
> > >> and
> > >>>>>>>>> Weaponry? Actually the most important question, will there be
> > >> vendors
> > >> who
> > >>>>>>>>> specialize in Roman Clothing that cater those of the curvesque
> > >>>>>> nature??
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> Important Questions :-)
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> Vale Optime,
> > >>>>>>>>> Statia Aeternia
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> > >>>>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>
> > >> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > ------------------------------------
> > >
> > > Yahoo! Groups Links
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
>
>
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79765 From: Belle Morte Statia Date: 2010-08-26
Subject: Re: INVITATION CONVENTVS NOVAE ROMAE NORTH AMERICA
Salve et Salvete Omnes:

Okay so I did some snooping and sending out my owls to my great "Ren-Web"
since South Carolina is part of the Kingdom known as Atlantia (in SCA
lingo), its a good area Re-Enacting wise. According to my sources, there
are some Barbarians within the Roman Legion known as Castra Romana VIII, and
they are considered a very elite group.

Is this group that will be attending the Conventus? If so, thats just
spiffy!

Vale Bene,
Aeternia



On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 8:47 PM, Belle Morte Statia <syrenslullaby@...
> wrote:

> Aeternia Iulia Aquila sal,
>
>
> Well I don't want to be the oddball out, is there a local Barbarian Horde
> within that area? If so have they been invited?
>
> Anyone notice that Aeternia suddenly has 20 million questions about this?
>
> 90% percent of my closet is "black" attire, so me not wearing it is like a
> foreign concept in my brain lol.... But I think purple will go well so I
> don't look to gloomy.
>
>
> Vale,
> Aeternia
>
>
> On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 7:33 PM, luciaiuliaaquila <
> luciaiuliaaquila@...> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> Iulia Aeterniae Magistrae S.P.D.
>>
>> Thank you Magistra, I am moving this thread to the info group:)
>>
>>
>> >So uh just out slight curiousity, when era of the
>> > empire is garb required to be in?
>>
>> Statia Aeternia *slow smile* The Republic. Don't worry about it too much,
>> let your inner barbarian shine!
>> I have no problem with black and purple:)
>>
>> I will not be dressed in "period" the entire time:)
>>
>> Valete bene,
>>
>> Julia
>>
>>
>> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com <Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com>, Belle
>> Morte Statia <syrenslullaby@...> wrote:
>> >
>> > Statia Cornelia Aeternia A. Tulliae Scholasticae L. Juliae Aquilae
>> s.p.d.
>> >
>> >
>> > Metellus take notes! So uh just out slight curiousity, when era of the
>> > empire is garb required to be in? Is Barbarian attire accepted? Thats
>> what
>> > I normally wear, for my Roman Re-Enacting....
>> >
>> > But something more traditional is always nice to have as well,
>> especially in
>> > black and purple...
>> >
>> > *laughs nervously and hides*
>> >
>> >
>> > Vale Optime,
>> > Statia Aeternia
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79766 From: Gaius Date: 2010-08-26
Subject: Re: the partitioning of Nova Roma.
Ha! If we could work together like that, there would be no need for a partition in the first place.

Laenas

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "lathyrus77" <lathyrus77@...> wrote:
>
> I agree partition is the only way to solve 99% of the problems. I have some logistics questions:
>
>
> How would we legally divide the treasury?
>
> Who holds the trademarks and copyrights? Do we share copyright?
>
> Would we have liasons between the to sides?
>
> Is there a possibility for the litigious among us to wage legal battle between the two groups?
>
> I'm assuming each side will have a PM, and preist groups. Will they confer so as keep the religio whole?
>
>
> - Anna
>
> AKA Annia Minucia Marcella
>
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "M. Octavius Gracchus" <octaviusgracchus@> wrote:
> >
> > On 08/25/2010 03:55 PM, lathyrus77 wrote:
> > > This is a good idea.
> > >
> > > And not everything has to be separate; since there is a natural rivalry, the ludi games would be a lot more interesting.
> >
> > Right now, at any time, either the Establishment or the Resistance could form a
> > new group of their own, and forbid the leaders of the opposition from joining.
> > That is psychologically unsatisfactory.
> >
> > For it would be "letting the b******s win", "running away", "taking our marbles
> > and going home", etc.
> >
> > So long as the other side gets the name Nova Roma, the treasury, the web site,
> > the continuity... neither faction will give up willingly.
> >
> > Partition solves that. We wouldn't be giving up Nova Roma to our enemies...
> > we'd be keeping the best of it, and throwing the bums out.
> >
> > Both groups would have a name that was some variant of "Nova Roma", if they
> > wished; but neither group could use "Nova Roma" without the modifier.
> >
> > (That would be repugnant - giving the name of "Nova Roma" to the adversary.
> > That would be admitting defeat. So, neither group should use it.)
> >
> > Both groups would lay claim to the shared history of 1998-2010; we would refer
> > to events by the names of the consuls of those years, even of those consuls went
> > to the other side.
> >
> > Neither group has to give up the web site, which is a bit dated but has some
> > good features, and lots of good wiki content... we'd clone it. Roma Red, Roma
> > Blue; with novaroma.org just a placeholder page that suggests visitors look at both.
> >
> > Aside from a few grudges amongst the old-timers on both sides, the rivalry could
> > even be a friendly one, as you say; there could be occasional games between
> > them. Even a shared Conventus would be possible, though it would probably be
> > unwise to have me and Piscinus in the same room without a heavily armed
> > policeman standing watch. (mods: this is a joke, not a threat).
> >
> > Consuls, Censors, leaders of the Senate... would it be worth half the treasury
> > and a change of the organization name to have all of your enemies simply *go*
> > *away*, peacefully and voluntarily?
> >
> > And then, with your adversaries no longer caring at all about your internal
> > affairs, polluting this mailing list with rants against you, or quarreling about
> > who the "real" pontifex maximus is, you can engage them - from a safe distance -
> > in occasional sporting events or cooperative projects.
> >
> > PARTITION. It's the only way.
> >
> > Vale, Octavius.
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79767 From: Cn. Cornelius Lentulus Date: 2010-08-26
Subject: Nova Romans Meet Today!
Cn. Lentulus omnibus Quiritibus sal.


I want to inform you that as legatus pro praetore Pannoniae, I received today 2 fellow Nova Romans, C. Aurelius Vindex from Italia, and M. Prometheus Decius Golia from Dacia! They are guests in my house, now. And we spend two Nova Roman days together :) We were accompanied by Livia Plauta, too.

I have the pleasure having met 3 times with Marcus Prometheus, but it is a great joy that I meet the excellet C. Aurelius Vindex now first time in my life!

We send our greatings to all Nova Romans!

Vindex, Prometheus, Lentulus and Livia, we all send hugs and kisses to you!


VALETE!

LONG LIVE NOVA ROMA!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79768 From: lathyrus77 Date: 2010-08-26
Subject: Re: the partitioning of Nova Roma.
--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "L. Livia Plauta" <livia.plauta@...> wrote:
>
> Salvete omnes,
> I suspected the idea wouldn't be well received by all ...
> It seems our newly self-appointed arbiter disagrees.
>
> Valete,
> Livia
>
>


Yes, there's that too. What about the people who don't want to split? Shall it be forced upon them?

And what if the split isn't equal? Would a relatively few people inherit half the treasury?


There's a lot to work out for this. And I have no say in it since I'm not a member of Nova Roma. I still think splitting NR in to 2 orgs would be most beneficial overall though.


-Anna Bucci

AKA Annia Minucia Marcella
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79769 From: rory12001 Date: 2010-08-26
Subject: Re: INVITATION CONVENTVS NOVAE ROMAE NORTH AMERICA
Maior Aeterniae omnibusque spd;

wear what you like but you are incorrect. You can check Bonfante & Sebesta's book on "The World of Roman Costume". In Rome's past both sexes equally wore the toga.

During the Republic, young girls and young boys wore the toga until their maturity. Married women didn't wear the toga they wore the tunica and stola. Prostitutes and divorced women wore the toga. Sebesta and others wonder if the divorcee wearing the toga meant she was free of legal tutelage, pretty interesting.

So that's the short story about women and toga-wearing. Wear it, don't wear it that's your choice.
vale
Maior

>
>
> Oh my days of the JCL (Junior Classical League) are long long gone...
> Women do not wear Togas if I recall correctly, so neither will I.
>
>
> Vale,
> Aeternia
>
> On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 11:13 PM, rory12001 <rory12001@...> wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > Maior Aeterniae Scholasticaeque spd;
> > the toga pulla was also worn by Roman pythagoreans, so it marks you out as
> > a vegetarian. Nigidius Figulus and Vatinus & other outre types wore them. If
> > I have the time & find nice fabric I might have one made up.
> > wear purple or whatever colour you like, it's not a big issue. Unless
> > you're wearing a toga.
> > valete
> > Maior
> >
> >
> > >
> > > Well, black is generally viewed as mourning attire, but a certain party
> > > reputedly wore the toga pulla even otherwise...
> > > >
> > > > *laughs nervously and hides*
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Vale Optime,
> > > > Statia Aeternia
> > >
> > > Vale, et valete.
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 5:22 PM, A. Tullia Scholastica <fororom@
> >
> > > >> wrote:
> > > >
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>> A. Tullia Scholastica L. Juliae Aquilae Statiae Corneliae Aeternae
> > > >> quiritibus
> > > >>
> > > >>> bonae voluntatis S.P.D.
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Ave Statia Aeternia!
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Rota and I just finished discussing this and we are going to set a
> > block
> > > >> of
> > > >>> time for Magistra's ancient clothing workshop and Rota's wife Sonia,
> > will
> > > >> be
> > > >>> taking measurements for custom clothing. Of course she will be
> > > >> completeing the
> > > >>> creation of the garments after the conventus, but she does beautiful
> > > >> work.
> > > >>> Look at the Ludi Megalenses from earlier this year and she is wearing
> > a
> > > >> tunic
> > > >>> that she made. If this is something you might want to do you might
> > also
> > > >>> consider purchasing some material you like.
> > > >>> You will need two panels of cloth, linen is ok but fine summer wieght
> > > >> wool
> > > >>> will probably drape better and won't wrinkle as easy. Of course you
> > can
> > > >> use
> > > >>> silk as well, raw silk is easier to take care of and ca usually be
> > > >> handwashed.
> > > >>> Each panel should be 45" to 52" wide (these are usually the widths
> > you
> > > >> will
> > > >>> find in the store) bear in mind the width also dictates how long the
> > > >> "sleeves"
> > > >>> will be. The length should be your height from the neck to floor plus
> > > >> about a
> > > >>> foot so that when you tie it at the waist it will drape nicely and
> > not be
> > > >>> restricting. The Palla is a rectangular piece of material at least 5'
> > by
> > > >> 9'
> > > >>> but it can be bigger for comfort.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> ATS: Greek and Roman clothing, like that of some other peoples,
> > belongs
> > > >>> to what is called the draped tradition of clothing manufacture, not
> > the
> > > >>> tailored tradition used in much of Western attire. There are no
> > patterns
> > > >> as
> > > >>> such; clothing resembles sheets, blankets, and pillowcases which are
> > > >> fastened
> > > >>> and draped in various ways. As Julia says, a tunica (or khiton) is
> > made
> > > >> from
> > > >>> two panels of fabric, seamed up the sides and (in the Roman tunica,
> > and
> > > >> some
> > > >>> forms of the Greek khiton) across the shoulders, then hemmed at the
> > > >> bottom.
> > > >>> One can also cut into this and make a T-shape if desired, but the
> > plain
> > > >>> two-panel version is easier, and probably better for those who are
> > > >> pneumatic
> > > >>> or chunky. In the latter case at least, I would try to get 56 inch
> > fabric
> > > >> (or
> > > >>> wider if possible). Vertically pleated crinkle cotton is fine for the
> > > >> khiton
> > > >>> (cotton-poly is okay unless one is a reenactor), and plain cotton or
> > > >> linen or
> > > >>> cotton/linen mixed is fine for the Roman women�s tunica, as is
> > silk. The
> > > >> men
> > > >>> use wool, and the women can do the same if desired. The short men�s
> > > >> khiton or
> > > >>> men�s tunica should fall to about mid-calf to the ankle when ungirt
> > (and
> >
> > > >> the
> > > >>> Roman version at least was almost always girt), and the long khiton
> > or
> > > >> women�s
> >
> > > >>> tunica should be at least floor length; the long khiton (worn by
> > women,
> > > >>> deities, musicians, charioteers, and older men) had to be at least
> > one
> > > >> foot
> > > >>> longer than the wearer, and longer is better as multiple belts / ties
> > > >> were
> > > >>> used. If one cannot find fabric wide enough that two panels will work
> > > >> (say
> > > >>> one meter or a bit wider, perhaps 42 inches), one would have to use
> > three
> > > >>> panels and split the third vertically, then sew it to the other two,
> > one
> > > >>> section on each side so that it is even. The himation can be
> > narrower,
> > > >> and so
> > > >>> can the Greek capes, the chlamys and the chlaina; methinks that one
> > would
> > > >> have
> > > >>> to be quite tall to require a wide fabric even for the palla /
> > pallium.
> > > >> To
> > > >>> me, five feet wide would be overkill. The himation seems fine with
> > maybe
> > > >> two
> > > >>> to three yards (or meters) of 40-45 inch fabric, though this will
> > depend
> > > >> on
> > > >>> the size of the wearer, and the chlamys / chlaina requires even less,
> > > >> maybe
> > > >>> two yards / meters.
> > > >>
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>> I hope Livia and Magistra see this so they can add to, or correct,
> > what I
> > > >> just
> > > >>> told you:)
> > > >>>
> > > >>> ATS: Magistra did see it...hope this helps.
> > > >>
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Now you should join the info group - and then start a new thread and
> > post
> > > >> this
> > > >>> under "Roman Clothing" *laughs*
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Vale bene,
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Julia
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Vale, et valete.
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com <Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com><Nova-Roma%
> > 40yahoogroups.com> <mailto:
> > > >> Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com <Nova-Roma%2540yahoogroups.com>> , Belle
> > > >>
> > > >>> Morte Statia <syrenslullaby@> wrote:
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> Ave Iulia Aquila!
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> Hmmm... If anyone knows where I can find patterns for Roman/Greek
> > > >> attire
> > > >>>>> possibly I could ask our resident Tailor Metellus to concot
> > something
> > > >> for
> > > >>>>> Aeternia (if I ask very very nicely). But not sure if I can request
> > > >> the
> > > >>>>> time off or find a traveling companion to accompany me, it would be
> > > >> nice
> > > >>>> to
> > > >>>>> have Kitabear with me but so many people and my beloved hound, he'd
> > be
> > > >> all
> > > >>>>> over the place lol.
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> Now that I see you also have dancing girls, I must say Julia and
> > Rota
> > > >> do
> > > >>>>> know how to put on a shindig..
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> I shall look into the matter more so that I may be able to attend.
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> Vale Optime,
> > > >>>>> Aeternia
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 11:53 AM, luciaiuliaaquila <
> > > >>>>> luciaiuliaaquila@> wrote:
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> Ave Statia Aeternia!
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> Very important questions!
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> The status on garb is that we should all wear some:)
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> It would be great for all of us to be able to dress in Roman
> > > >> clothing
> > > >> and
> > > >>>>>>> my personal goal it to at least sell my wares wearing a tunica or
> > > >>>>> khiton. We
> > > >>>>>>> shall see, time may not be on my side.
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> Currently we are coordinating with Scholastica to do a
> > presentation
> > > >> on
> > > >>>>>>> ancient clothing but she can tell you how to make a tunica or
> > > >> khiton
> > > >>>>>>> etc.(they are easy, even stitched by hand) I am opting for a
> > > >> khiton, I
> > > >>>>> hope.
> > > >>>>>>> Rota's wife makes wonderful Roman clothing but I am not sure she
> > > >> will
> > > >>>>> have
> > > >>>>>>> time to do anything before the conventus - however she might
> > could
> > > >> get
> > > >>>>> your
> > > >>>>>>> measurements and make something for you, but I am not sure - I
> > will
> > > >> ask
> > > >>>>> her.
> > > >>>>>>> If you would like to volunteer to check about the internet and
> > > >> maybe >>>
> > > >> help
> > > >>>>>>> get a Roman clothing vendor to come that will earn you "Rota
> > > >> bucks".
> > > >>>>>>> We will have a display of shield and sword and of course we have
> > > >> some
> > > >>>>> folks
> > > >>>>>>> from various legios. I will be bringing a couple of "personal"
> > > >> weapons
> > > >>>>>>> myself. I have a few replicas as well that are not the best but I
> > > >> am
> > > >>>>>>> bringing them - the best will be brought by Rota and other
> > > >> legionairres.
> > > >>>>>>> As for curvesque figures - I am thankful for Roman clothing!
> > > >> LaWren's
> > > >>>>> nest
> > > >>>>>>> finally has put up some new clothing and has some for we more
> > > >> voluptuous
> > > >>>>>>> types. http://www.lawrensnest.com/roman.html
> > > >>>>>>> If you come I do hope you plan to take advantage of the open
> > forum
> > > >> and
> > > >>>>> read
> > > >>>>>>> an appropriate poem or two:)
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> Vale,
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> Julia
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> <syrenslullaby@> wrote:
> > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>> Statia Aeternia Iuliae Aquilae sal:
> > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>> Wow this looks like you all will have a blast for sure! What's
> > > >> the
> > > >>>>>> status
> > > >>>>>>>>> on garb? Will you have vendors there who specialize in Roman
> > > >> Clothing
> > > >> and
> > > >>>>>>>>> Weaponry? Actually the most important question, will there be
> > > >> vendors
> > > >> who
> > > >>>>>>>>> specialize in Roman Clothing that cater those of the curvesque
> > > >>>>>> nature??
> > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>> Important Questions :-)
> > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>> Vale Optime,
> > > >>>>>>>>> Statia Aeternia
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>
> > > >> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > ------------------------------------
> > > >
> > > > Yahoo! Groups Links
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79770 From: Belle Morte Statia Date: 2010-08-26
Subject: Re: INVITATION CONVENTVS NOVAE ROMAE NORTH AMERICA
Aeternia Maiori sal:

That's nice to know, thank you for the info.

vale,
Aeternia

On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 10:49 AM, rory12001 <rory12001@...> wrote:

>
>
> Maior Aeterniae omnibusque spd;
>
> wear what you like but you are incorrect. You can check Bonfante &
> Sebesta's book on "The World of Roman Costume". In Rome's past both sexes
> equally wore the toga.
>
> During the Republic, young girls and young boys wore the toga until their
> maturity. Married women didn't wear the toga they wore the tunica and stola.
> Prostitutes and divorced women wore the toga. Sebesta and others wonder if
> the divorcee wearing the toga meant she was free of legal tutelage, pretty
> interesting.
>
> So that's the short story about women and toga-wearing. Wear it, don't wear
> it that's your choice.
> vale
> Maior
>
>
> >
> >
> > Oh my days of the JCL (Junior Classical League) are long long gone...
> > Women do not wear Togas if I recall correctly, so neither will I.
> >
> >
> > Vale,
> > Aeternia
> >
> > On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 11:13 PM, rory12001 <rory12001@...> wrote:
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > Maior Aeterniae Scholasticaeque spd;
> > > the toga pulla was also worn by Roman pythagoreans, so it marks you out
> as
> > > a vegetarian. Nigidius Figulus and Vatinus & other outre types wore
> them. If
> > > I have the time & find nice fabric I might have one made up.
> > > wear purple or whatever colour you like, it's not a big issue. Unless
> > > you're wearing a toga.
> > > valete
> > > Maior
> > >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > Well, black is generally viewed as mourning attire, but a certain
> party
> > > > reputedly wore the toga pulla even otherwise...
> > > > >
> > > > > *laughs nervously and hides*
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Vale Optime,
> > > > > Statia Aeternia
> > > >
> > > > Vale, et valete.
> > > > >
> > > > > On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 5:22 PM, A. Tullia Scholastica <fororom@
> > >
> > > > >> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> A. Tullia Scholastica L. Juliae Aquilae Statiae Corneliae
> Aeternae
> > > > >> quiritibus
> > > > >>
> > > > >>> bonae voluntatis S.P.D.
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> Ave Statia Aeternia!
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> Rota and I just finished discussing this and we are going to set
> a
> > > block
> > > > >> of
> > > > >>> time for Magistra's ancient clothing workshop and Rota's wife
> Sonia,
> > > will
> > > > >> be
> > > > >>> taking measurements for custom clothing. Of course she will be
> > > > >> completeing the
> > > > >>> creation of the garments after the conventus, but she does
> beautiful
> > > > >> work.
> > > > >>> Look at the Ludi Megalenses from earlier this year and she is
> wearing
> > > a
> > > > >> tunic
> > > > >>> that she made. If this is something you might want to do you
> might
> > > also
> > > > >>> consider purchasing some material you like.
> > > > >>> You will need two panels of cloth, linen is ok but fine summer
> wieght
> > > > >> wool
> > > > >>> will probably drape better and won't wrinkle as easy. Of course
> you
> > > can
> > > > >> use
> > > > >>> silk as well, raw silk is easier to take care of and ca usually
> be
> > > > >> handwashed.
> > > > >>> Each panel should be 45" to 52" wide (these are usually the
> widths
> > > you
> > > > >> will
> > > > >>> find in the store) bear in mind the width also dictates how long
> the
> > > > >> "sleeves"
> > > > >>> will be. The length should be your height from the neck to floor
> plus
> > > > >> about a
> > > > >>> foot so that when you tie it at the waist it will drape nicely
> and
> > > not be
> > > > >>> restricting. The Palla is a rectangular piece of material at
> least 5'
> > > by
> > > > >> 9'
> > > > >>> but it can be bigger for comfort.
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> ATS: Greek and Roman clothing, like that of some other peoples,
> > > belongs
> > > > >>> to what is called the draped tradition of clothing manufacture,
> not
> > > the
> > > > >>> tailored tradition used in much of Western attire. There are no
> > > patterns
> > > > >> as
> > > > >>> such; clothing resembles sheets, blankets, and pillowcases which
> are
> > > > >> fastened
> > > > >>> and draped in various ways. As Julia says, a tunica (or khiton)
> is
> > > made
> > > > >> from
> > > > >>> two panels of fabric, seamed up the sides and (in the Roman
> tunica,
> > > and
> > > > >> some
> > > > >>> forms of the Greek khiton) across the shoulders, then hemmed at
> the
> > > > >> bottom.
> > > > >>> One can also cut into this and make a T-shape if desired, but the
> > > plain
> > > > >>> two-panel version is easier, and probably better for those who
> are
> > > > >> pneumatic
> > > > >>> or chunky. In the latter case at least, I would try to get 56
> inch
> > > fabric
> > > > >> (or
> > > > >>> wider if possible). Vertically pleated crinkle cotton is fine for
> the
> > > > >> khiton
> > > > >>> (cotton-poly is okay unless one is a reenactor), and plain cotton
> or
> > > > >> linen or
> > > > >>> cotton/linen mixed is fine for the Roman women���s tunica, as is
> > > silk. The
> > > > >> men
> > > > >>> use wool, and the women can do the same if desired. The short
> men���s
> > > > >> khiton or
> > > > >>> men���s tunica should fall to about mid-calf to the ankle when
> ungirt
> > > (and
> > >
> > > > >> the
> > > > >>> Roman version at least was almost always girt), and the long
> khiton
> > > or
> > > > >> women���s
> > >
> > > > >>> tunica should be at least floor length; the long khiton (worn by
> > > women,
> > > > >>> deities, musicians, charioteers, and older men) had to be at
> least
> > > one
> > > > >> foot
> > > > >>> longer than the wearer, and longer is better as multiple belts /
> ties
> > > > >> were
> > > > >>> used. If one cannot find fabric wide enough that two panels will
> work
> > > > >> (say
> > > > >>> one meter or a bit wider, perhaps 42 inches), one would have to
> use
> > > three
> > > > >>> panels and split the third vertically, then sew it to the other
> two,
> > > one
> > > > >>> section on each side so that it is even. The himation can be
> > > narrower,
> > > > >> and so
> > > > >>> can the Greek capes, the chlamys and the chlaina; methinks that
> one
> > > would
> > > > >> have
> > > > >>> to be quite tall to require a wide fabric even for the palla /
> > > pallium.
> > > > >> To
> > > > >>> me, five feet wide would be overkill. The himation seems fine
> with
> > > maybe
> > > > >> two
> > > > >>> to three yards (or meters) of 40-45 inch fabric, though this will
> > > depend
> > > > >> on
> > > > >>> the size of the wearer, and the chlamys / chlaina requires even
> less,
> > > > >> maybe
> > > > >>> two yards / meters.
> > > > >>
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> I hope Livia and Magistra see this so they can add to, or
> correct,
> > > what I
> > > > >> just
> > > > >>> told you:)
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> ATS: Magistra did see it...hope this helps.
> > > > >>
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> Now you should join the info group - and then start a new thread
> and
> > > post
> > > > >> this
> > > > >>> under "Roman Clothing" *laughs*
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> Vale bene,
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> Julia
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> Vale, et valete.
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com <Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com><Nova-Roma%
> 40yahoogroups.com><Nova-Roma%
>
> > > 40yahoogroups.com> <mailto:
> > > > >> Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com <Nova-Roma%2540yahoogroups.com>> ,
> Belle
> > > > >>
> > > > >>> Morte Statia <syrenslullaby@> wrote:
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>> Ave Iulia Aquila!
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>> Hmmm... If anyone knows where I can find patterns for
> Roman/Greek
> > > > >> attire
> > > > >>>>> possibly I could ask our resident Tailor Metellus to concot
> > > something
> > > > >> for
> > > > >>>>> Aeternia (if I ask very very nicely). But not sure if I can
> request
> > > > >> the
> > > > >>>>> time off or find a traveling companion to accompany me, it
> would be
> > > > >> nice
> > > > >>>> to
> > > > >>>>> have Kitabear with me but so many people and my beloved hound,
> he'd
> > > be
> > > > >> all
> > > > >>>>> over the place lol.
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>> Now that I see you also have dancing girls, I must say Julia
> and
> > > Rota
> > > > >> do
> > > > >>>>> know how to put on a shindig..
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>> I shall look into the matter more so that I may be able to
> attend.
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>> Vale Optime,
> > > > >>>>> Aeternia
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>> On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 11:53 AM, luciaiuliaaquila <
> > > > >>>>> luciaiuliaaquila@> wrote:
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>> Ave Statia Aeternia!
> > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>> Very important questions!
> > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>> The status on garb is that we should all wear some:)
> > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>> It would be great for all of us to be able to dress in Roman
> > > > >> clothing
> > > > >> and
> > > > >>>>>>> my personal goal it to at least sell my wares wearing a
> tunica or
> > > > >>>>> khiton. We
> > > > >>>>>>> shall see, time may not be on my side.
> > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>> Currently we are coordinating with Scholastica to do a
> > > presentation
> > > > >> on
> > > > >>>>>>> ancient clothing but she can tell you how to make a tunica or
> > > > >> khiton
> > > > >>>>>>> etc.(they are easy, even stitched by hand) I am opting for a
> > > > >> khiton, I
> > > > >>>>> hope.
> > > > >>>>>>> Rota's wife makes wonderful Roman clothing but I am not sure
> she
> > > > >> will
> > > > >>>>> have
> > > > >>>>>>> time to do anything before the conventus - however she might
> > > could
> > > > >> get
> > > > >>>>> your
> > > > >>>>>>> measurements and make something for you, but I am not sure -
> I
> > > will
> > > > >> ask
> > > > >>>>> her.
> > > > >>>>>>> If you would like to volunteer to check about the internet
> and
> > > > >> maybe >>>
> > > > >> help
> > > > >>>>>>> get a Roman clothing vendor to come that will earn you "Rota
> > > > >> bucks".
> > > > >>>>>>> We will have a display of shield and sword and of course we
> have
> > > > >> some
> > > > >>>>> folks
> > > > >>>>>>> from various legios. I will be bringing a couple of
> "personal"
> > > > >> weapons
> > > > >>>>>>> myself. I have a few replicas as well that are not the best
> but I
> > > > >> am
> > > > >>>>>>> bringing them - the best will be brought by Rota and other
> > > > >> legionairres.
> > > > >>>>>>> As for curvesque figures - I am thankful for Roman clothing!
> > > > >> LaWren's
> > > > >>>>> nest
> > > > >>>>>>> finally has put up some new clothing and has some for we more
> > > > >> voluptuous
> > > > >>>>>>> types. http://www.lawrensnest.com/roman.html
> > > > >>>>>>> If you come I do hope you plan to take advantage of the open
> > > forum
> > > > >> and
> > > > >>>>> read
> > > > >>>>>>> an appropriate poem or two:)
> > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>> Vale,
> > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>> Julia
> > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>> <syrenslullaby@> wrote:
> > > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>> Statia Aeternia Iuliae Aquilae sal:
> > > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>> Wow this looks like you all will have a blast for sure!
> What's
> > > > >> the
> > > > >>>>>> status
> > > > >>>>>>>>> on garb? Will you have vendors there who specialize in
> Roman
> > > > >> Clothing
> > > > >> and
> > > > >>>>>>>>> Weaponry? Actually the most important question, will there
> be
> > > > >> vendors
> > > > >> who
> > > > >>>>>>>>> specialize in Roman Clothing that cater those of the
> curvesque
> > > > >>>>>> nature??
> > > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>> Important Questions :-)
> > > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>> Vale Optime,
> > > > >>>>>>>>> Statia Aeternia
> > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>
> > > > >> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > ------------------------------------
> > > > >
> > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
>
>
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79771 From: mcorvvs Date: 2010-08-26
Subject: Re: Nova Romans Meet Today!
Salvete Lentule omnibusque,

greeting to you and your guests. I envy I did not have this plaesure. ;)

Valete bene,

CORVVS

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Cn. Cornelius Lentulus" <cn_corn_lent@...> wrote:
>
> Cn. Lentulus omnibus Quiritibus sal.
>
>
> I want to inform you that as legatus pro praetore Pannoniae, I received today 2 fellow Nova Romans, C. Aurelius Vindex from Italia, and M. Prometheus Decius Golia from Dacia! They are guests in my house, now. And we spend two Nova Roman days together :) We were accompanied by Livia Plauta, too.
>
> I have the pleasure having met 3 times with Marcus Prometheus, but it is a great joy that I meet the excellet C. Aurelius Vindex now first time in my life!
>
> We send our greatings to all Nova Romans!
>
> Vindex, Prometheus, Lentulus and Livia, we all send hugs and kisses to you!
>
>
> VALETE!
>
> LONG LIVE NOVA ROMA!
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79772 From: Belle Morte Statia Date: 2010-08-26
Subject: Re: Nova Romans Meet Today!
Sta. Aeternia Cn. Lentulo sal:


Most excellent news Lentulus, I hope you all enjoyed yourselves.


Vale,
Aeternia

On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 9:38 AM, Cn. Cornelius Lentulus <
cn_corn_lent@...> wrote:

>
>
> Cn. Lentulus omnibus Quiritibus sal.
>
> I want to inform you that as legatus pro praetore Pannoniae, I received
> today 2 fellow Nova Romans, C. Aurelius Vindex from Italia, and M.
> Prometheus Decius Golia from Dacia! They are guests in my house, now. And we
> spend two Nova Roman days together :) We were accompanied by Livia Plauta,
> too.
>
> I have the pleasure having met 3 times with Marcus Prometheus, but it is a
> great joy that I meet the excellet C. Aurelius Vindex now first time in my
> life!
>
> We send our greatings to all Nova Romans!
>
> Vindex, Prometheus, Lentulus and Livia, we all send hugs and kisses to you!
>
> VALETE!
>
> LONG LIVE NOVA ROMA!
>
>
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79773 From: rory12001 Date: 2010-08-26
Subject: Re: Nova Romans Meet Today!
Maior Lentulo Livaeque spd;

sounds wonderful! Can't wait to hear more.
valete
Maior

-
>
>
> Most excellent news Lentulus, I hope you all enjoyed yourselves.
>
>
> Vale,
> Aeternia
>
> On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 9:38 AM, Cn. Cornelius Lentulus <
> cn_corn_lent@...> wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > Cn. Lentulus omnibus Quiritibus sal.
> >
> > I want to inform you that as legatus pro praetore Pannoniae, I received
> > today 2 fellow Nova Romans, C. Aurelius Vindex from Italia, and M.
> > Prometheus Decius Golia from Dacia! They are guests in my house, now. And we
> > spend two Nova Roman days together :) We were accompanied by Livia Plauta,
> > too.
> >
> > I have the pleasure having met 3 times with Marcus Prometheus, but it is a
> > great joy that I meet the excellet C. Aurelius Vindex now first time in my
> > life!
> >
> > We send our greatings to all Nova Romans!
> >
> > Vindex, Prometheus, Lentulus and Livia, we all send hugs and kisses to you!
> >
> > VALETE!
> >
> > LONG LIVE NOVA ROMA!
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79774 From: James V Hooper Date: 2010-08-26
Subject: Re: the partitioning of Nova Roma.
Salve Omnes,

I understand the need of some groups to have a "space" of their own, but I am
not in favor of partitioning Nova Roma. History tells us that when The Roman
Empire was divided into east and west, it was the begining of the end.
Citizens who want their own groups, should be allowed to form them, but I
think this republic of ours is large enough to embrace that ideal without
breaking away from the main group.
Only one mans opinion...

Vale, C. Pompeius Marcellus


On Thu, 26 Aug 2010 04:21:36 -0000
"petronius_dexter" <jfarnoud94@...> wrote:
> Ave,
>
> The dissolution was already proposed in ancient Roma but did not work. I
>think that it is a false good idea.
>
> Why a such dissolution? Division of the treasury in two equal parts, with
>many citizens who would be in the both Novae Romae.
>
> This division need is only political and seems to me a stupidity. If the
>hybris of one man who wants to be the master of NR is the cause of this
>division, you will have the same problem with two Novae Romae. Instead of one
>master, you will have two masters with new need of divisions into each future
>Nova Roma and then we will have 4 Novae Romae, and so on...
>
> If someone is not happy here he can quit.
>
> Valete.
>
> C. Petronius Dexter
> Tribunus Plebis Arcoiali scribebat
> a. d. VII Kalendas Septembres P. Memmio K. Fabio II coss.
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79775 From: rory12001 Date: 2010-08-26
Subject: Re: INVITATION CONVENTVS NOVAE ROMAE NORTH AMERICA
Major Aeterniae spd

my pleasure. Just thinking if you want some Celtic style you could get a palla in tartan, I've seen great lavendar & black ones in cotton and silks, you'd just need to find fabric you like.
valeas

>
> That's nice to know, thank you for the info.
>
> vale,
> Aeternia
>
> On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 10:49 AM, rory12001 <rory12001@...> wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > Maior Aeterniae omnibusque spd;
> >
> > wear what you like but you are incorrect. You can check Bonfante &
> > Sebesta's book on "The World of Roman Costume". In Rome's past both sexes
> > equally wore the toga.
> >
> > During the Republic, young girls and young boys wore the toga until their
> > maturity. Married women didn't wear the toga they wore the tunica and stola.
> > Prostitutes and divorced women wore the toga. Sebesta and others wonder if
> > the divorcee wearing the toga meant she was free of legal tutelage, pretty
> > interesting.
> >
> > So that's the short story about women and toga-wearing. Wear it, don't wear
> > it that's your choice.
> > vale
> > Maior
> >
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > Oh my days of the JCL (Junior Classical League) are long long gone...
> > > Women do not wear Togas if I recall correctly, so neither will I.
> > >
> > >
> > > Vale,
> > > Aeternia
> > >
> > > On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 11:13 PM, rory12001 <rory12001@> wrote:
> > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Maior Aeterniae Scholasticaeque spd;
> > > > the toga pulla was also worn by Roman pythagoreans, so it marks you out
> > as
> > > > a vegetarian. Nigidius Figulus and Vatinus & other outre types wore
> > them. If
> > > > I have the time & find nice fabric I might have one made up.
> > > > wear purple or whatever colour you like, it's not a big issue. Unless
> > > > you're wearing a toga.
> > > > valete
> > > > Maior
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Well, black is generally viewed as mourning attire, but a certain
> > party
> > > > > reputedly wore the toga pulla even otherwise...
> > > > > >
> > > > > > *laughs nervously and hides*
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Vale Optime,
> > > > > > Statia Aeternia
> > > > >
> > > > > Vale, et valete.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 5:22 PM, A. Tullia Scholastica <fororom@
> > > >
> > > > > >> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>> A. Tullia Scholastica L. Juliae Aquilae Statiae Corneliae
> > Aeternae
> > > > > >> quiritibus
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>> bonae voluntatis S.P.D.
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>> Ave Statia Aeternia!
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>> Rota and I just finished discussing this and we are going to set
> > a
> > > > block
> > > > > >> of
> > > > > >>> time for Magistra's ancient clothing workshop and Rota's wife
> > Sonia,
> > > > will
> > > > > >> be
> > > > > >>> taking measurements for custom clothing. Of course she will be
> > > > > >> completeing the
> > > > > >>> creation of the garments after the conventus, but she does
> > beautiful
> > > > > >> work.
> > > > > >>> Look at the Ludi Megalenses from earlier this year and she is
> > wearing
> > > > a
> > > > > >> tunic
> > > > > >>> that she made. If this is something you might want to do you
> > might
> > > > also
> > > > > >>> consider purchasing some material you like.
> > > > > >>> You will need two panels of cloth, linen is ok but fine summer
> > wieght
> > > > > >> wool
> > > > > >>> will probably drape better and won't wrinkle as easy. Of course
> > you
> > > > can
> > > > > >> use
> > > > > >>> silk as well, raw silk is easier to take care of and ca usually
> > be
> > > > > >> handwashed.
> > > > > >>> Each panel should be 45" to 52" wide (these are usually the
> > widths
> > > > you
> > > > > >> will
> > > > > >>> find in the store) bear in mind the width also dictates how long
> > the
> > > > > >> "sleeves"
> > > > > >>> will be. The length should be your height from the neck to floor
> > plus
> > > > > >> about a
> > > > > >>> foot so that when you tie it at the waist it will drape nicely
> > and
> > > > not be
> > > > > >>> restricting. The Palla is a rectangular piece of material at
> > least 5'
> > > > by
> > > > > >> 9'
> > > > > >>> but it can be bigger for comfort.
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>> ATS: Greek and Roman clothing, like that of some other peoples,
> > > > belongs
> > > > > >>> to what is called the draped tradition of clothing manufacture,
> > not
> > > > the
> > > > > >>> tailored tradition used in much of Western attire. There are no
> > > > patterns
> > > > > >> as
> > > > > >>> such; clothing resembles sheets, blankets, and pillowcases which
> > are
> > > > > >> fastened
> > > > > >>> and draped in various ways. As Julia says, a tunica (or khiton)
> > is
> > > > made
> > > > > >> from
> > > > > >>> two panels of fabric, seamed up the sides and (in the Roman
> > tunica,
> > > > and
> > > > > >> some
> > > > > >>> forms of the Greek khiton) across the shoulders, then hemmed at
> > the
> > > > > >> bottom.
> > > > > >>> One can also cut into this and make a T-shape if desired, but the
> > > > plain
> > > > > >>> two-panel version is easier, and probably better for those who
> > are
> > > > > >> pneumatic
> > > > > >>> or chunky. In the latter case at least, I would try to get 56
> > inch
> > > > fabric
> > > > > >> (or
> > > > > >>> wider if possible). Vertically pleated crinkle cotton is fine for
> > the
> > > > > >> khiton
> > > > > >>> (cotton-poly is okay unless one is a reenactor), and plain cotton
> > or
> > > > > >> linen or
> > > > > >>> cotton/linen mixed is fine for the Roman women�s tunica, as is
> > > > silk. The
> > > > > >> men
> > > > > >>> use wool, and the women can do the same if desired. The short
> > men�s
> > > > > >> khiton or
> > > > > >>> men�s tunica should fall to about mid-calf to the ankle when
> > ungirt
> > > > (and
> > > >
> > > > > >> the
> > > > > >>> Roman version at least was almost always girt), and the long
> > khiton
> > > > or
> > > > > >> women�s
> > > >
> > > > > >>> tunica should be at least floor length; the long khiton (worn by
> > > > women,
> > > > > >>> deities, musicians, charioteers, and older men) had to be at
> > least
> > > > one
> > > > > >> foot
> > > > > >>> longer than the wearer, and longer is better as multiple belts /
> > ties
> > > > > >> were
> > > > > >>> used. If one cannot find fabric wide enough that two panels will
> > work
> > > > > >> (say
> > > > > >>> one meter or a bit wider, perhaps 42 inches), one would have to
> > use
> > > > three
> > > > > >>> panels and split the third vertically, then sew it to the other
> > two,
> > > > one
> > > > > >>> section on each side so that it is even. The himation can be
> > > > narrower,
> > > > > >> and so
> > > > > >>> can the Greek capes, the chlamys and the chlaina; methinks that
> > one
> > > > would
> > > > > >> have
> > > > > >>> to be quite tall to require a wide fabric even for the palla /
> > > > pallium.
> > > > > >> To
> > > > > >>> me, five feet wide would be overkill. The himation seems fine
> > with
> > > > maybe
> > > > > >> two
> > > > > >>> to three yards (or meters) of 40-45 inch fabric, though this will
> > > > depend
> > > > > >> on
> > > > > >>> the size of the wearer, and the chlamys / chlaina requires even
> > less,
> > > > > >> maybe
> > > > > >>> two yards / meters.
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>> I hope Livia and Magistra see this so they can add to, or
> > correct,
> > > > what I
> > > > > >> just
> > > > > >>> told you:)
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>> ATS: Magistra did see it...hope this helps.
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>> Now you should join the info group - and then start a new thread
> > and
> > > > post
> > > > > >> this
> > > > > >>> under "Roman Clothing" *laughs*
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>> Vale bene,
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>> Julia
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>> Vale, et valete.
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com <Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com><Nova-Roma%
> > 40yahoogroups.com><Nova-Roma%
> >
> > > > 40yahoogroups.com> <mailto:
> > > > > >> Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com <Nova-Roma%2540yahoogroups.com>> ,
> > Belle
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>> Morte Statia <syrenslullaby@> wrote:
> > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > >>>>> Ave Iulia Aquila!
> > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > >>>>> Hmmm... If anyone knows where I can find patterns for
> > Roman/Greek
> > > > > >> attire
> > > > > >>>>> possibly I could ask our resident Tailor Metellus to concot
> > > > something
> > > > > >> for
> > > > > >>>>> Aeternia (if I ask very very nicely). But not sure if I can
> > request
> > > > > >> the
> > > > > >>>>> time off or find a traveling companion to accompany me, it
> > would be
> > > > > >> nice
> > > > > >>>> to
> > > > > >>>>> have Kitabear with me but so many people and my beloved hound,
> > he'd
> > > > be
> > > > > >> all
> > > > > >>>>> over the place lol.
> > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > >>>>> Now that I see you also have dancing girls, I must say Julia
> > and
> > > > Rota
> > > > > >> do
> > > > > >>>>> know how to put on a shindig..
> > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > >>>>> I shall look into the matter more so that I may be able to
> > attend.
> > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > >>>>> Vale Optime,
> > > > > >>>>> Aeternia
> > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > >>>>> On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 11:53 AM, luciaiuliaaquila <
> > > > > >>>>> luciaiuliaaquila@> wrote:
> > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>> Ave Statia Aeternia!
> > > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>> Very important questions!
> > > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>> The status on garb is that we should all wear some:)
> > > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>> It would be great for all of us to be able to dress in Roman
> > > > > >> clothing
> > > > > >> and
> > > > > >>>>>>> my personal goal it to at least sell my wares wearing a
> > tunica or
> > > > > >>>>> khiton. We
> > > > > >>>>>>> shall see, time may not be on my side.
> > > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>> Currently we are coordinating with Scholastica to do a
> > > > presentation
> > > > > >> on
> > > > > >>>>>>> ancient clothing but she can tell you how to make a tunica or
> > > > > >> khiton
> > > > > >>>>>>> etc.(they are easy, even stitched by hand) I am opting for a
> > > > > >> khiton, I
> > > > > >>>>> hope.
> > > > > >>>>>>> Rota's wife makes wonderful Roman clothing but I am not sure
> > she
> > > > > >> will
> > > > > >>>>> have
> > > > > >>>>>>> time to do anything before the conventus - however she might
> > > > could
> > > > > >> get
> > > > > >>>>> your
> > > > > >>>>>>> measurements and make something for you, but I am not sure -
> > I
> > > > will
> > > > > >> ask
> > > > > >>>>> her.
> > > > > >>>>>>> If you would like to volunteer to check about the internet
> > and
> > > > > >> maybe >>>
> > > > > >> help
> > > > > >>>>>>> get a Roman clothing vendor to come that will earn you "Rota
> > > > > >> bucks".
> > > > > >>>>>>> We will have a display of shield and sword and of course we
> > have
> > > > > >> some
> > > > > >>>>> folks
> > > > > >>>>>>> from various legios. I will be bringing a couple of
> > "personal"
> > > > > >> weapons
> > > > > >>>>>>> myself. I have a few replicas as well that are not the best
> > but I
> > > > > >> am
> > > > > >>>>>>> bringing them - the best will be brought by Rota and other
> > > > > >> legionairres.
> > > > > >>>>>>> As for curvesque figures - I am thankful for Roman clothing!
> > > > > >> LaWren's
> > > > > >>>>> nest
> > > > > >>>>>>> finally has put up some new clothing and has some for we more
> > > > > >> voluptuous
> > > > > >>>>>>> types. http://www.lawrensnest.com/roman.html
> > > > > >>>>>>> If you come I do hope you plan to take advantage of the open
> > > > forum
> > > > > >> and
> > > > > >>>>> read
> > > > > >>>>>>> an appropriate poem or two:)
> > > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>> Vale,
> > > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>> Julia
> > > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>> <syrenslullaby@> wrote:
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>>>> Statia Aeternia Iuliae Aquilae sal:
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>>>> Wow this looks like you all will have a blast for sure!
> > What's
> > > > > >> the
> > > > > >>>>>> status
> > > > > >>>>>>>>> on garb? Will you have vendors there who specialize in
> > Roman
> > > > > >> Clothing
> > > > > >> and
> > > > > >>>>>>>>> Weaponry? Actually the most important question, will there
> > be
> > > > > >> vendors
> > > > > >> who
> > > > > >>>>>>>>> specialize in Roman Clothing that cater those of the
> > curvesque
> > > > > >>>>>> nature??
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>>>> Important Questions :-)
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>>>> Vale Optime,
> > > > > >>>>>>>>> Statia Aeternia
> > > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > >>>>> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > ------------------------------------
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> > >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79776 From: lathyrus77 Date: 2010-08-26
Subject: Re: the partitioning of Nova Roma.
This isn't an actual empire or republic though. This an organization, and orgs can split.


A while back the Asatru Free Assembly split in to Asatru Alliance, Asatru Folk Assembly, and The Troth. All of them have flourished since then.




--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "James V Hooper" <warrior44_us@...> wrote:
>
> Salve Omnes,
>
> I understand the need of some groups to have a "space" of their own, but I am
> not in favor of partitioning Nova Roma. History tells us that when The Roman
> Empire was divided into east and west, it was the begining of the end.
> Citizens who want their own groups, should be allowed to form them, but I
> think this republic of ours is large enough to embrace that ideal without
> breaking away from the main group.
> Only one mans opinion...
>
> Vale, C. Pompeius Marcellus
>
>
> On Thu, 26 Aug 2010 04:21:36 -0000
> "petronius_dexter" <jfarnoud94@...> wrote:
> > Ave,
> >
> > The dissolution was already proposed in ancient Roma but did not work. I
> >think that it is a false good idea.
> >
> > Why a such dissolution? Division of the treasury in two equal parts, with
> >many citizens who would be in the both Novae Romae.
> >
> > This division need is only political and seems to me a stupidity. If the
> >hybris of one man who wants to be the master of NR is the cause of this
> >division, you will have the same problem with two Novae Romae. Instead of one
> >master, you will have two masters with new need of divisions into each future
> >Nova Roma and then we will have 4 Novae Romae, and so on...
> >
> > If someone is not happy here he can quit.
> >
> > Valete.
> >
> > C. Petronius Dexter
> > Tribunus Plebis Arcoiali scribebat
> > a. d. VII Kalendas Septembres P. Memmio K. Fabio II coss.
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79777 From: M. Octavius Gracchus Date: 2010-08-26
Subject: Re: the partitioning of Nova Roma.
Annia Minucia Marcella writes:

> Yes, there's that too. What about the people who don't want to split?
> Shall it be forced upon them?

Like anything else, majority rules; if the Senate or Comitia decide a split is
best, and figure out a way to do it within US law, a split would happen.

This means those who like things just as they are would lose an option,
certainly. They'd also lose that option if NR completely collapsed, too -
something that seems more likely (two praetores, two tribunes, CIO, CFO, Chief
Vestal, all lost in a short period of time. Consuls at each others throats...
Augurs not doing auguries... collapse is imminent).

But there are plenty who don't like things as they are, who cannot be a part of
Nova Roma as it is today for one reason or another. For me, those reasons
include the Leges Saliciae and the identity of the pontifex maximus. For you,
those reasons will be different.

Having two groups where there was once one opens up options to all of us who,
for one reason or another, dislike the status quo.

Individual citzens would be free to choose one group, both, or neither - the
only restrictions should be that the same person cannot be senator/pontifex in
both simultaneously, and some of the more divisive people on either side would
be entirely banned from the opposing group for at least the first few years, to
create a safe space for those who were hounded away by them.

Two prominent citizens - the Chief Vestal and the CIO - resigned, just within
the past few weeks. One of the praetores gave up her citizenship a few months
ago.

What if they'd had another option?

What if they could avoid the people, laws, situations they found so
objectionable, merely by switching to the "other" Nova Roma?

They wouldn't be lost to the community.

> And what if the split isn't equal? Would a relatively few people inherit half the treasury?

This would be a point of negotiation once the numbers become better known, and
senators and citizens declare for one side or the other.

I could countenance a 60/40 split (after lawyers' fees), if one group turns out
to be *much* larger than the other, but nothing more lopsided than that. And,
pragmatically speaking, none of the senators will vote for a split if they think
their group is getting screwed. Some, on either side, will even feel that their
faction is entitled to keep *all* of the money.

For me personally, the money is the *least* important of the resources to be
divided up; it's the intangible, intellectual property that's more important.
The historical continuity, the name, the logo, the ability to say "our group was
founded twelve years ago, and I was consul eight years ago"... all of these are
more important than mere money.

> There's a lot to work out for this. And I have no say in it since I'm not
> a member of Nova Roma. I

But you are someone who might return to one of the new Novae Romae, I think...
and so am I. We're here because we care.

And there will be cooperation and collaboration between the groups. If the
other side wants to have lawsuits and trials and a legal system thicker than the
Oxford English Dictionary, that's fine - it won't harm me, I'm not subject to it
- and I can certainly cooperate and communicate with someone who has chosen to
voluntarily place themselves under it. If you say that one person is Pontifex
Maximus and I say that another is, no harm done; we'll both be right, and your
pontiff can't influence me in the slightest.

If someone has a falling out with their fellow members, there will be somewhere
they can go, where they're still "Nova Romans" (while presently, they either
disappear completely, or return as vengeful ghosts to haunt the mailing lists as
non-citizen entities). Ranks and titles won't transfer between the spin-off
groups, but membership and seniority date would.

Want to get away from me and Sulla? We're banned from group A. Want to get
away from Piscinus and Modianus? They're banned from group B. Refuse to
participate in Lex Salicia trials? Hopefully one of the splinter groups will
refuse to ratify them during the split. But if you like participating in that
sort of thing, it will be available in the other camp.

And there might be mailing lists or other collaborative projects between the
two. Imagine a Religio Romana list where pontifices are banned from using their
titles - they'll be judged on the quality of their words alone. Or Sodalitas
lists where citizens from either side freely intermingle.

With two groups that are closely allied *culturally*, but completely independent
*politically*, you'd almost always have somewhere to go.

And it would largely *end* the fighting on this list (or its two successor
lists). Everyone's enemies, on either side, would simply go away, cheerfully
and voluntarily.

Vale, Octavius.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79778 From: rory12001 Date: 2010-08-26
Subject: Re: the partitioning of Nova Roma.
Salve Livia amica;
legally the Board needs to pass a resolution and then we put it to the cives to vote: not hard.
for the nitty gritty, have the Maine lawyer make the divisions.

I think its pretty easy as people are just sick and tired of the incessant fighting. And as Anna Minucia pointed out other orgs have done it and prospered.
vale
Maior

I know I am.

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "L. Livia Plauta" <livia.plauta@...> wrote:
>
> Salvete omnes,
> I think Gracchus idea is wonderful and well thought-out. I'm just afraid
> implementing it would require an unity we don't have at the moment. Not to
> talk about the voting instruments we don't have.
> But miracles can happen, ad I think this would be the best solution.
>
> Optime valete,
> Livia
>
>
> > Annia Minucia Marcella wrote:
> >> How would we legally divide the treasury?
> >
> > Quick answer: give about 10% of it to a lawyer and let them figure it out.
> >
> > I'm sure it's doable. The Maine statues that Maior posted earlier
> > mentioned
> > transfering the treasury of a nonprofit to an organization engaged in
> > similar
> > activities. Splitting it among *two* similar organizations shouldn't be
> > difficult.
> >
> >> Who holds the trademarks and copyrights? Do we share copyright?
> >
> > I don't know if it's possible for two groups to hold the trademark
> > jointly; it
> > might be that one side would keep it, and would issue some sort of
> > irrevocable
> > license to the other.
> >
> > And if that's not possible, then *both* would have to change their names
> > to
> > something that didn't include "Nova Roma" at all. I think it's important
> > that
> > neither gets to claim exclusive rights to the name, for that would make
> > those of
> > the other group feel like they'd been banished.
> >
> > I think there'll be a lot of legal paperwork involved in this in any case.
> >
> > As for copyrights to the web site, we'd have the major contributors sign
> > statements saying they allow the other group to use, modify, redistribute
> > their
> > content. In the free software world, there are various licenses for this,
> > like
> > the GFDL or Creative Commons; we'd mimic one of these.
> >
> > The two sides might even jointly sponsor the project to rebuild the web
> > site in
> > a modern framework, assuming they can agree on the requirements; the
> > programmer
> > would simply deliver two independent installations of the same thing.
> >
> >> Would we have liasons between the to sides?
> >
> > Oh, absolutely. There are a few people who are respected by both
> > factions:
> > Venator, Audens, Pompeia... whichever side they end up on, they'll make
> > good
> > ambassadors.
> >
> > I think we need a rule that one can't be in the Senate or Collegia of both
> > groups simultaneously, but being an ordinary member of both shouldn't be a
> > problem.
> >
> >> Is there a possibility for the litigious among us to wage legal battle
> >> between the two groups?
> >
> > This is always hard to prevent (at least in America, where lawyers
> > outnumber
> > humans 2:1), but by removing everyone's enemies to a group that can, for
> > the
> > most part, be ignored, there's less opportunity for conflict.
> >
> > It'll be like when SVR spun away from NR. We were aware they had consuls,
> > a
> > Pontifex Maximus, and a Senate, but nobody really cared - out of sight,
> > out of mind.
> >
> >> I'm assuming each side will have a PM, and preist groups.
> > > Will they confer so as keep the religio whole?
> >
> > Almost certainly not. Those of us in the anti-establishment faction
> > *loathe*
> > Piscinus, and will *never* acknowledge him as PM or Augur. Cassius is our
> > Pontifex Maximus, and will be until the day he dies or *voluntarily* gives
> > up
> > the office.
> >
> > No, our collegia will do our thing, the other collegia will do their
> > thing, and
> > they'll ignore each other. Maybe they'll read and comment on each other's
> > academic papers, but that'd be the limit of cooperation.
> >
> > There might be some joint invocation if there's a conventus, but otherwise
> > it'll
> > be just like Catholics and Protestants and Orthodox - each do their own
> > thing.
> >
> > Vale, Octavius.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79779 From: petronius_dexter Date: 2010-08-26
Subject: Re: the partitioning of Nova Roma.
C. Petronius M. Graccho s.p.d.,

> But there are plenty who don't like things as they are, who cannot be a part of Nova Roma as it is today for one reason or another. For me, those reasons include the Leges Saliciae and the identity of the pontifex maximus.

So, if you do not like the identity of the US president you ask the partitioning of the USA?

Vale.

C. Petronius Dexter
Arcoiali scribebat
a. d. VII Kalendas Septembres P. Memmio K. Fabio II coss.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79780 From: gualterus_graecus Date: 2010-08-26
Subject: Re: the partitioning of Nova Roma.
Salve,

Well, every beginning has an end, but the eastern half of the Roman Empire went on for another thousand years. I think partitioning NR would solve many of the fundamental problems we have now, and it would do so in a way that allows everyone to save face--there would be no "losers".

Vale,

Gualterus Graecus

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "James V Hooper" <warrior44_us@...> wrote:
>
> Salve Omnes,
>
> I understand the need of some groups to have a "space" of their own, but I am
> not in favor of partitioning Nova Roma. History tells us that when The Roman
> Empire was divided into east and west, it was the begining of the end.
> Citizens who want their own groups, should be allowed to form them, but I
> think this republic of ours is large enough to embrace that ideal without
> breaking away from the main group.
> Only one mans opinion...
>
> Vale, C. Pompeius Marcellus
>
>
> On Thu, 26 Aug 2010 04:21:36 -0000
> "petronius_dexter" <jfarnoud94@...> wrote:
> > Ave,
> >
> > The dissolution was already proposed in ancient Roma but did not work. I
> >think that it is a false good idea.
> >
> > Why a such dissolution? Division of the treasury in two equal parts, with
> >many citizens who would be in the both Novae Romae.
> >
> > This division need is only political and seems to me a stupidity. If the
> >hybris of one man who wants to be the master of NR is the cause of this
> >division, you will have the same problem with two Novae Romae. Instead of one
> >master, you will have two masters with new need of divisions into each future
> >Nova Roma and then we will have 4 Novae Romae, and so on...
> >
> > If someone is not happy here he can quit.
> >
> > Valete.
> >
> > C. Petronius Dexter
> > Tribunus Plebis Arcoiali scribebat
> > a. d. VII Kalendas Septembres P. Memmio K. Fabio II coss.
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79781 From: gualterus_graecus Date: 2010-08-26
Subject: Re: the partitioning of Nova Roma.
Salve,

Of course, even before lawyers touch all of the details, there would have to be a basic understanding between both sided about the broad outline of the split; for example, how the money is divided, how rights over the name and the website are shared, etc.

But, yes, I think it is a fine proposal; it allows both camps to move past each other in the directions they want without anyone feeling like they've been sacrificed, condemned or betrayed, and both sides retain continuity with the original NR; both can take pride in the shared history.

And, this doesn't mean that there couldn't be occasional collaboration between both sides, such as in conventus or games.

Vale,

Gualterus

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "rory12001" <rory12001@...> wrote:
>
> Salve Livia amica;
> legally the Board needs to pass a resolution and then we put it to the cives to vote: not hard.
> for the nitty gritty, have the Maine lawyer make the divisions.
>
> I think its pretty easy as people are just sick and tired of the incessant fighting. And as Anna Minucia pointed out other orgs have done it and prospered.
> vale
> Maior
>
> I know I am.
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "L. Livia Plauta" <livia.plauta@> wrote:
> >
> > Salvete omnes,
> > I think Gracchus idea is wonderful and well thought-out. I'm just afraid
> > implementing it would require an unity we don't have at the moment. Not to
> > talk about the voting instruments we don't have.
> > But miracles can happen, ad I think this would be the best solution.
> >
> > Optime valete,
> > Livia
> >
> >
> > > Annia Minucia Marcella wrote:
> > >> How would we legally divide the treasury?
> > >
> > > Quick answer: give about 10% of it to a lawyer and let them figure it out.
> > >
> > > I'm sure it's doable. The Maine statues that Maior posted earlier
> > > mentioned
> > > transfering the treasury of a nonprofit to an organization engaged in
> > > similar
> > > activities. Splitting it among *two* similar organizations shouldn't be
> > > difficult.
> > >
> > >> Who holds the trademarks and copyrights? Do we share copyright?
> > >
> > > I don't know if it's possible for two groups to hold the trademark
> > > jointly; it
> > > might be that one side would keep it, and would issue some sort of
> > > irrevocable
> > > license to the other.
> > >
> > > And if that's not possible, then *both* would have to change their names
> > > to
> > > something that didn't include "Nova Roma" at all. I think it's important
> > > that
> > > neither gets to claim exclusive rights to the name, for that would make
> > > those of
> > > the other group feel like they'd been banished.
> > >
> > > I think there'll be a lot of legal paperwork involved in this in any case.
> > >
> > > As for copyrights to the web site, we'd have the major contributors sign
> > > statements saying they allow the other group to use, modify, redistribute
> > > their
> > > content. In the free software world, there are various licenses for this,
> > > like
> > > the GFDL or Creative Commons; we'd mimic one of these.
> > >
> > > The two sides might even jointly sponsor the project to rebuild the web
> > > site in
> > > a modern framework, assuming they can agree on the requirements; the
> > > programmer
> > > would simply deliver two independent installations of the same thing.
> > >
> > >> Would we have liasons between the to sides?
> > >
> > > Oh, absolutely. There are a few people who are respected by both
> > > factions:
> > > Venator, Audens, Pompeia... whichever side they end up on, they'll make
> > > good
> > > ambassadors.
> > >
> > > I think we need a rule that one can't be in the Senate or Collegia of both
> > > groups simultaneously, but being an ordinary member of both shouldn't be a
> > > problem.
> > >
> > >> Is there a possibility for the litigious among us to wage legal battle
> > >> between the two groups?
> > >
> > > This is always hard to prevent (at least in America, where lawyers
> > > outnumber
> > > humans 2:1), but by removing everyone's enemies to a group that can, for
> > > the
> > > most part, be ignored, there's less opportunity for conflict.
> > >
> > > It'll be like when SVR spun away from NR. We were aware they had consuls,
> > > a
> > > Pontifex Maximus, and a Senate, but nobody really cared - out of sight,
> > > out of mind.
> > >
> > >> I'm assuming each side will have a PM, and preist groups.
> > > > Will they confer so as keep the religio whole?
> > >
> > > Almost certainly not. Those of us in the anti-establishment faction
> > > *loathe*
> > > Piscinus, and will *never* acknowledge him as PM or Augur. Cassius is our
> > > Pontifex Maximus, and will be until the day he dies or *voluntarily* gives
> > > up
> > > the office.
> > >
> > > No, our collegia will do our thing, the other collegia will do their
> > > thing, and
> > > they'll ignore each other. Maybe they'll read and comment on each other's
> > > academic papers, but that'd be the limit of cooperation.
> > >
> > > There might be some joint invocation if there's a conventus, but otherwise
> > > it'll
> > > be just like Catholics and Protestants and Orthodox - each do their own
> > > thing.
> > >
> > > Vale, Octavius.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79782 From: petronius_dexter Date: 2010-08-26
Subject: Re: the partitioning of Nova Roma.
Ave,

What group will be Nova Roma? Only the group called Nova Roma will save face... so, this division will solve nothing because every group will want to be The Nova Roma.

A partitioning solution is a false good idea.

Optime vale.

C. Petronius Dexter
Arcoiali scribebat
a. d. VII Kalendas Septembres P. Memmio K. Fabio II coss.

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "gualterus_graecus" <waltms1@...> wrote:
>
>
> Salve,
>
> Well, every beginning has an end, but the eastern half of the Roman Empire went on for another thousand years. I think partitioning NR would solve many of the fundamental problems we have now, and it would do so in a way that allows everyone to save face--there would be no "losers".
>
> Vale,
>
> Gualterus Graecus
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "James V Hooper" <warrior44_us@> wrote:
> >
> > Salve Omnes,
> >
> > I understand the need of some groups to have a "space" of their own, but I am
> > not in favor of partitioning Nova Roma. History tells us that when The Roman
> > Empire was divided into east and west, it was the begining of the end.
> > Citizens who want their own groups, should be allowed to form them, but I
> > think this republic of ours is large enough to embrace that ideal without
> > breaking away from the main group.
> > Only one mans opinion...
> >
> > Vale, C. Pompeius Marcellus
> >
> >
> > On Thu, 26 Aug 2010 04:21:36 -0000
> > "petronius_dexter" <jfarnoud94@> wrote:
> > > Ave,
> > >
> > > The dissolution was already proposed in ancient Roma but did not work. I
> > >think that it is a false good idea.
> > >
> > > Why a such dissolution? Division of the treasury in two equal parts, with
> > >many citizens who would be in the both Novae Romae.
> > >
> > > This division need is only political and seems to me a stupidity. If the
> > >hybris of one man who wants to be the master of NR is the cause of this
> > >division, you will have the same problem with two Novae Romae. Instead of one
> > >master, you will have two masters with new need of divisions into each future
> > >Nova Roma and then we will have 4 Novae Romae, and so on...
> > >
> > > If someone is not happy here he can quit.
> > >
> > > Valete.
> > >
> > > C. Petronius Dexter
> > > Tribunus Plebis Arcoiali scribebat
> > > a. d. VII Kalendas Septembres P. Memmio K. Fabio II coss.
> > >
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79783 From: Publius Ullerius Stephanus Venator Date: 2010-08-26
Subject: Re: Conventus - RSVP...
Venus is Love, beyond human
Feeling, knowing, reaching the core
In some this is, whole and wholesome
In others it is, fit for maggots


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79784 From: M. Octavius Gracchus Date: 2010-08-26
Subject: Re: the partitioning of Nova Roma.
Salve Dexter,

> What group will be Nova Roma? Only the group called Nova Roma will save face... so, this division will solve nothing because every group will want to be The Nova Roma.

I addressed this issue briefly in the original proposal.

Both, and neither, will be "Nova Roma".

You're right, it's a matter of face; if one group retains the name and the other
does not, the group without it will look like refugees.

That is why both groups must adopt some *variant* of the name Nova Roma, and be
forbidden from using the unadorned name in any official communications.

I've been using these as examples:

Nova Roma Aeterna - for Cassius supporters

Nova Roma Resurgens - for Piscinus supporters

(Or the other way around. Or something entirely different.)

Neither should ever be allowed to use the name "Nova Roma" without the
qualifier, and directors of both must sign a contract stating this.

By forcing both groups to adopt a new name, it puts them on an equal footing,
which is necessary if this plan is to have any chance of being adopted.

Of course, since "Nova Roma" is trademarked, a lawyer will have to be consulted
about this. Can two independent (yet cooperating) groups share a trademark? I
don't know. I think that, in the worst case, one group would own the mark, and
sign an contract giving irrevocable usage rights to the other, which would then
pay part of the trademark maintenance fees.

Vale, Octavius.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79785 From: gualterus_graecus Date: 2010-08-26
Subject: Re: the partitioning of Nova Roma.
Salve,

In this partition neither side would get unqualified use of the name "Nova Roma". "Nova Roma" could be shared as the name of an internet portal, a shared website, that links to the independent websites of both sides and explains the shared history. The two splinter organizations would have qualified names like, for example, "Nova Roma Resurrecta" or "Nova Roma Antiqua". Neither side would be able to use the unqualified "Nova Roma" to officially refer to themselves except as a reference to the shared past or in some abstract sense, such as cives of both groups being "Nova Romans" by virtue of their sharing common origins and some history.

Vale,

Gualterus

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "petronius_dexter" <jfarnoud94@...> wrote:
>
> Ave,
>
> What group will be Nova Roma? Only the group called Nova Roma will save face... so, this division will solve nothing because every group will want to be The Nova Roma.
>
> A partitioning solution is a false good idea.
>
> Optime vale.
>
> C. Petronius Dexter
> Arcoiali scribebat
> a. d. VII Kalendas Septembres P. Memmio K. Fabio II coss.
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "gualterus_graecus" <waltms1@> wrote:
> >
> >
> > Salve,
> >
> > Well, every beginning has an end, but the eastern half of the Roman Empire went on for another thousand years. I think partitioning NR would solve many of the fundamental problems we have now, and it would do so in a way that allows everyone to save face--there would be no "losers".
> >
> > Vale,
> >
> > Gualterus Graecus
> >
> > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "James V Hooper" <warrior44_us@> wrote:
> > >
> > > Salve Omnes,
> > >
> > > I understand the need of some groups to have a "space" of their own, but I am
> > > not in favor of partitioning Nova Roma. History tells us that when The Roman
> > > Empire was divided into east and west, it was the begining of the end.
> > > Citizens who want their own groups, should be allowed to form them, but I
> > > think this republic of ours is large enough to embrace that ideal without
> > > breaking away from the main group.
> > > Only one mans opinion...
> > >
> > > Vale, C. Pompeius Marcellus
> > >
> > >
> > > On Thu, 26 Aug 2010 04:21:36 -0000
> > > "petronius_dexter" <jfarnoud94@> wrote:
> > > > Ave,
> > > >
> > > > The dissolution was already proposed in ancient Roma but did not work. I
> > > >think that it is a false good idea.
> > > >
> > > > Why a such dissolution? Division of the treasury in two equal parts, with
> > > >many citizens who would be in the both Novae Romae.
> > > >
> > > > This division need is only political and seems to me a stupidity. If the
> > > >hybris of one man who wants to be the master of NR is the cause of this
> > > >division, you will have the same problem with two Novae Romae. Instead of one
> > > >master, you will have two masters with new need of divisions into each future
> > > >Nova Roma and then we will have 4 Novae Romae, and so on...
> > > >
> > > > If someone is not happy here he can quit.
> > > >
> > > > Valete.
> > > >
> > > > C. Petronius Dexter
> > > > Tribunus Plebis Arcoiali scribebat
> > > > a. d. VII Kalendas Septembres P. Memmio K. Fabio II coss.
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79786 From: petronius_dexter Date: 2010-08-26
Subject: Re: the partitioning of Nova Roma.
Ave,

> Of course, even before lawyers touch all of the details, there would have to be a basic understanding between both sided about the broad outline of the split; for example, how the money is divided, how rights over the name and the website are shared, etc.

Why only two sides? I think your proposal is very poor in possibilities and Nova Roma is not divided in two camps, in saying that you are only zooming on two political and opposite camps, but these political camps are not present within the sodalitates of Nova Roma and perhaps are not the only political groups.

The true problem of Nova Roma is not political, it is some individuals are wanting Nova Roma as their own, if we divide Nova Roma in as parts as "owners" we lose all reason to be in.

Optime vale.

C. Petronius Dexter
Arcoiali scribebat
a. d. VII Kalendas Septembres P. Memmio K. Fabio II coss.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79787 From: M. Octavius Gracchus Date: 2010-08-26
Subject: Re: the partitioning of Nova Roma.
>> Of course, even before lawyers touch all of the details, there would have to be a basic understanding between both sided about the broad outline of the split; for example, how the money is divided, how rights over the name and the website are shared, etc.

Right. That's why this will take months to accomplish. If we could finalize
the split by 1 January, then all four of next year's consuls could take office
at the customary time.

> Why only two sides? I think your proposal is very poor in possibilities and Nova Roma is not divided in two camps, in saying that you are only zooming on two political and opposite camps, but these political camps are not present within the sodalitates of Nova Roma and perhaps are not the only political groups.

There are more factions than two at present, yes, but I think there is a long
history of two main opposing camps, going back to about 2000. The issues have
changed, and some people have gone from one side to the other - some making that
switch more than once - but the opposing camps aren't all that different than
they were in 2000.

The supporters of Marius Fimbria became the Amici Dignitatis, then the consular
cohort of Caeso Fabius, then the Libra Alliance, and are now the supporters of
Piscinus.

The supporters of Censors Vedius and Sulla became the Boni, then the Back Alley
people, and are now those who favour the return of Cassius.

There have been defections. I was an ally of the Libra people for a long time;
Modianus was once one of the Boni. But the core groups have remained, and the
rift between them has only widened; particularly with the events of early 2008
and of July 2010.

Are there other, smaller factions? Yes. But these are less readily
identifiable, and less long-lived.

People who aren't closely allied to either of the main factions will have a
decision to make.

But - ordinary members should be able to belong to *both* groups, if they wish.
The only thing I want to forbid is membership in the Senate or Collegia of
both groups simultaneously; and that a few of the more controversial people
would be banned from one or the other, to prevent a hostile takeover.

Vale, Octavius.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79788 From: gualterus_graecus Date: 2010-08-26
Subject: Re: the partitioning of Nova Roma.
Salve,

The members of the sodalitates would be able to choose one or the other child org as their home. Yes, much of the polarization in NR is due to certain personalities, but those personalities will never leave and will never be legally removed. The fighting will not stop until the organization implodes. It seems wiser to make a controlled division where the opposing personalities can move into separate organizations than waiting until the united organization falls apart--which it seems it is doing now.

Of course, normal cives would be able to be citizens in both orgs, I imagine, and life in the sodalitates might remain as before: there could be agreements to share certain lists, or private lists could be created, for an informal shared sodalitas. But, most critically, the adminstrative, political and religious lives of the two orgs would be separate (although, I can envision some shared events for religious events).

Vale,

Gualterus


--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "petronius_dexter" <jfarnoud94@...> wrote:
>
> Ave,
>
> > Of course, even before lawyers touch all of the details, there would have to be a basic understanding between both sided about the broad outline of the split; for example, how the money is divided, how rights over the name and the website are shared, etc.
>
> Why only two sides? I think your proposal is very poor in possibilities and Nova Roma is not divided in two camps, in saying that you are only zooming on two political and opposite camps, but these political camps are not present within the sodalitates of Nova Roma and perhaps are not the only political groups.
>
> The true problem of Nova Roma is not political, it is some individuals are wanting Nova Roma as their own, if we divide Nova Roma in as parts as "owners" we lose all reason to be in.
>
> Optime vale.
>
> C. Petronius Dexter
> Arcoiali scribebat
> a. d. VII Kalendas Septembres P. Memmio K. Fabio II coss.
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79789 From: lathyrus77 Date: 2010-08-26
Subject: Re: the partitioning of Nova Roma.
Regarding NR names for the new groups, I dislike one group being regarded as original, and foundational, while the other is regarded as reformational, or revolutionary. As if one side were rebelling against the establishment. This is not a revolt, it's a separation.

And for those who dislike division, perhaps after some time apart the two sides can be reunited.


Some names I've thought up for new nova roman orgs:

Nova Roman People's Front
People's Front of Nova Roma
Nova Roman Popular People's Front
Popular Front of Nova Roma
Campaign for a Free Nova Roma



-Anna Bucci

AKA Annia Minucia Marcella
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79790 From: gualterus_graecus Date: 2010-08-26
Subject: Re: the partitioning of Nova Roma.
Salve,

Those were just example names; each org could decide how it wants to call itself. The point was that neither group could use the unqualified "Nova Roma".

Vale,

Gualterus

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "lathyrus77" <lathyrus77@...> wrote:
>
>
> Regarding NR names for the new groups, I dislike one group being regarded as original, and foundational, while the other is regarded as reformational, or revolutionary. As if one side were rebelling against the establishment. This is not a revolt, it's a separation.
>
> And for those who dislike division, perhaps after some time apart the two sides can be reunited.
>
>
> Some names I've thought up for new nova roman orgs:
>
> Nova Roman People's Front
> People's Front of Nova Roma
> Nova Roman Popular People's Front
> Popular Front of Nova Roma
> Campaign for a Free Nova Roma
>
>
>
> -Anna Bucci
>
> AKA Annia Minucia Marcella
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79791 From: rory12001 Date: 2010-08-26
Subject: Toga Pulla help
Maior omnibus spd;
I found a supplier of seemingly nice linen, would anyone have an idea how much fabric I'd need for a republican toga for someone of my height:
I'm 157.5 cm or 62 inches.

gratias
M. Hortensia Maior
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79792 From: C.Maria Caeca Date: 2010-08-26
Subject: Re: Toga Pulla help
Cacao Maori Sal,

HA! I knew you are taller than I am, LOL!

Caeca

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79793 From: C.Maria Caeca Date: 2010-08-26
Subject: Re: Toga Pulla help
Salvete,

Oh, dear gods! OK you are going to get a post from me with ...a very embarrassing mistake in my signature! I apologize, ahead of time, profusely! You see ...I hit the wrong button ...and it *sent* instead of letting me *correct*! Blame my cheap, crappy keyboard, *PLEASE*!

Valete,
Maria ...who will now go and find a ...comfortable *hole*!

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79794 From: rory12001 Date: 2010-08-26
Subject: Re: Toga Pulla help
Salve Caeca;
no problem, I have my share of typos and mistakes that I wish the magical keyboard would undo....thanks, I attend a Chinese buddhist temple from time to time and I'm taller than a lot of people there;
good times:)
vale



>
> Oh, dear gods! OK you are going to get a post from me with ...a very embarrassing mistake in my signature! I apologize, ahead of time, profusely! You see ...I hit the wrong button ...and it *sent* instead of letting me *correct*! Blame my cheap, crappy keyboard, *PLEASE*!
>
> Valete,
> Maria ...who will now go and find a ...comfortable *hole*!
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79795 From: deciusiunius Date: 2010-08-26
Subject: Re: the partitioning of Nova Roma.
Welcome back, Ann(i)a,


--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "lathyrus77" <lathyrus77@...> wrote:
>
> I agree partition is the only way to solve 99% of the problems. I have some logistics questions:

Well, everyone has different thoughts on this.


> How would we legally divide the treasury?

I would want NO ONE to get it. I would only agree if the money went to charity, which IIRC, is one of the requirements in the articles of incorporation anyway. As I recall it was Roman themed educational organizations but I doubt we could agree on one, so it would have to be something like the Red Cross.

> Who holds the trademarks and copyrights? Do we share copyright?

The name Nova Roma and all associated copyrights would be returned to William Bradford and Joeseph Bloch--also a requirement in the articles of incorporation in the case of dissolution. Perhaps there could be a requirement that the name not be use for a certain number of years.

> Would we have liasons between the to sides?

Sure. Most people on both sides would likely still talk to each other.
>
> Is there a possibility for the litigious among us to wage legal battle between the two groups?

Naturally, but if the money and copyrights are out of reach, esp. the money, then what would there be to fight about.


> I'm assuming each side will have a PM, and preist groups. Will they >confer so as keep the religio whole?

Good question. They should. Would they? <shrug? Who knows?


Vale,

Palladius
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79796 From: deciusiunius Date: 2010-08-26
Subject: Re: the partitioning of Nova Roma.
--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "lathyrus77" <lathyrus77@...> wrote:
>
>
> Regarding NR names for the new groups, I dislike one group being >regarded as original, and foundational, while the other is regarded >as reformational, or revolutionary. As if one side were rebelling >against the establishment. This is not a revolt, it's a separation.

But one group IS foundational, as it would contain all remaining members of Nova Roma who founded the group, and most if not all of the oldest citizens. So that is foundational.

I object to either group using the term Nova Roma. If we dissolve, neither group would use it, or at least not for awhile.

> Nova Roman People's Front
> People's Front of Nova Roma
> Nova Roman Popular People's Front
> Popular Front of Nova Roma
> Campaign for a Free Nova Roma

Most of these sound like NR terrorist groups!
You forgot the Nova Roman Liberation Army.

Vale,

Palladius
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79797 From: lathyrus77 Date: 2010-08-26
Subject: Re: the partitioning of Nova Roma.
--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "deciusiunius" <bcatfd@...> wrote:
>
>
> Welcome back, Ann(i)a,
>


I missed you Palladius.



-Anna Bucci

AKA Annia Minucia Marcella
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79798 From: deciusiunius Date: 2010-08-26
Subject: Re: the partitioning of Nova Roma.
--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "lathyrus77" <lathyrus77@...> wrote:
>
>
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "deciusiunius" <bcatfd@> wrote:
> >
> >
> > Welcome back, Ann(i)a,
> >
>
>
> I missed you Palladius.

Thanks Anna. I'm glad to see you back.


Palladius
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79799 From: rory12001 Date: 2010-08-26
Subject: Re: the partitioning of Nova Roma.
Salve Palladi;
if you read the Maine statute either the funds get returned to all the members or transferred to a similar org. You must respect the intent of the givers.

This is why a Maine attorney is necessary to do the job properly. And to explain these kinds of things. It would be totally transparant and above board.

Statute below:

D. That all remaining property and assets of the corporation have been distributed among its members in accordance with their respective rights and interests, or have been otherwise distributed pursuant to the articles or bylaws of the corporation, as long as the remaining property and assets of a public benefit corporation are transferred to a public benefit corporation engaged in activities substantially similar to those of the dissolving or liquidating corporation or to another entity pursuant to a conversion plan approved pursuant to Title 5, sections 194-B to 194-K; and [2001, c. 550, Pt. C, §23 (AMD); 2001, c. 550, Pt. C, §29 (AFF).]


--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "deciusiunius" <bcatfd@...> wrote:
>
>
> Welcome back, Ann(i)a,
>
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "lathyrus77" <lathyrus77@> wrote:
> >
> > I agree partition is the only way to solve 99% of the problems. I have some logistics questions:
>
> Well, everyone has different thoughts on this.
>
>
> > How would we legally divide the treasury?
>
> I would want NO ONE to get it. I would only agree if the money went to charity, which IIRC, is one of the requirements in the articles of incorporation anyway. As I recall it was Roman themed educational organizations but I doubt we could agree on one, so it would have to be something like the Red Cross.
>
> > Who holds the trademarks and copyrights? Do we share copyright?
>
> The name Nova Roma and all associated copyrights would be returned to William Bradford and Joeseph Bloch--also a requirement in the articles of incorporation in the case of dissolution. Perhaps there could be a requirement that the name not be use for a certain number of years.
>
> > Would we have liasons between the to sides?
>
> Sure. Most people on both sides would likely still talk to each other.
> >
> > Is there a possibility for the litigious among us to wage legal battle between the two groups?
>
> Naturally, but if the money and copyrights are out of reach, esp. the money, then what would there be to fight about.
>
>
> > I'm assuming each side will have a PM, and preist groups. Will they >confer so as keep the religio whole?
>
> Good question. They should. Would they? <shrug? Who knows?
>
>
> Vale,
>
> Palladius
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79800 From: Cato Date: 2010-08-26
Subject: de Res Publica
C. Equitius Cato senatore quaestore aedilis praetoris omnibus in Foro SPD

Over the past few days there has been much (serious) talk of the idea of dividing the Respublica along political factions; details about who can call themselves what and to whom the aerarium should be dispersed; the invocation of the macronational laws under which we are governed suddenly has become important to many of those who ignored or actively opposed obedience to those laws.

I say enough.

I will not, and cannot, support the destruction of the Respublica simply because those who ridicule the very basic laws and governing acts under which we operate see it as a convenient way out; nor because those who have fought long and hard to uphold the law feel that there can be no justice in this, *our* Respublica.

I am on the vanguard of those who have been despised and abused by those who seek to do us the most harm. I have spoken often, at great - some might say nauseatingly so - length about the need, the fundamental requirement, of those of us who have become citizens to uphold the common law in an effort to grasp in whatever way we can, the idea of being, and living as, Romans in a modern era.

I have been told that I am hated, despised, by those who currently hold power in our government; that I will never be elected to office again because the stranglehold held by those in power is too strong, too entrenched, to ever be broken and their hold over the minds of you, the People, is too strong.

I don't care.

I will continue to fight, to argue, to declaim, to speak freely in opposition to those who would see our Respublica sink into the mire of totalitarianism. I don't care if I never sit in the curule chair again, but I will *not* give up on the vision I have of a functioning, civilized and civilizing beacon of the values that took the vast, dark, ignorant world into a place of order, of law, of community.

Perhaps those who have tried repeatedly over the past few years to emasculate and destroy our Respublica will never have to answer for their crimes. Is this reason enough to rend the garment of the community we have built? Should we not, instead, seek to end their seemingly endless grasping at power and authority, and reclaim what is rightfully the inheritance of the *whole* Respublica - a seamless garment woven by the work and industry and faith of those who seek to build a better place?

I am a citizen of the Respublica. I am a senator of the Respublica. While I have breath in my body, I will *never* bow to the corruption and destruction of our community - even if I am jeered at and made the subject of the most base abuses conceivable. I hereby vow that I shall not rest, I shall not seek solace or comfort, I shall not seek rest or respite, until those who have brought such infamy upon our Respublica shall be brought to *our* justice.

I call upon our citizens, our senators, our magistrates, to reject the idea that tearing apart the Respublica will serve any kind of profitable end. This is *my* home, *my* Respublica. I will defend it to my last breath.

Valete,

Gaius Equitius Cato
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79801 From: lathyrus77 Date: 2010-08-27
Subject: Re: the partitioning of Nova Roma.
It's a reference to Monty Python that no one got apparently.

-Anna Bucci

AKA Annia Minucia Marcella

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "deciusiunius" <bcatfd@...> wrote:
>
>
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "lathyrus77" <lathyrus77@> wrote:
> >
> >
> > Regarding NR names for the new groups, I dislike one group being >regarded as original, and foundational, while the other is regarded >as reformational, or revolutionary. As if one side were rebelling >against the establishment. This is not a revolt, it's a separation.
>
> But one group IS foundational, as it would contain all remaining members of Nova Roma who founded the group, and most if not all of the oldest citizens. So that is foundational.
>
> I object to either group using the term Nova Roma. If we dissolve, neither group would use it, or at least not for awhile.
>
> > Nova Roman People's Front
> > People's Front of Nova Roma
> > Nova Roman Popular People's Front
> > Popular Front of Nova Roma
> > Campaign for a Free Nova Roma
>
> Most of these sound like NR terrorist groups!
> You forgot the Nova Roman Liberation Army.
>
> Vale,
>
> Palladius
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79802 From: lathyrus77 Date: 2010-08-27
Subject: Re: de Res Publica
what a load of crap cato.

What are you gonna do if NR is split? Gonna whine about it?



-Anna Bucci


AKA Annia Minucia Marcella

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Cato" <catoinnyc@...> wrote:
>
> C. Equitius Cato senatore quaestore aedilis praetoris omnibus in Foro SPD
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79803 From: rory12001 Date: 2010-08-27
Subject: Re: de Res Publica
Salve Anna;

I didn't even read it; but I'm going to write to Piscinus; just think being free of all that.....verbiage;-)
vale
Maior

>
> what a load of crap cato.
>
> What are you gonna do if NR is split? Gonna whine about it?
>
>
>
> -Anna Bucci
>
>
> AKA Annia Minucia Marcella
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Cato" <catoinnyc@> wrote:
> >
> > C. Equitius Cato senatore quaestore aedilis praetoris omnibus in Foro SPD
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79804 From: lathyrus77 Date: 2010-08-27
Subject: Re: de Res Publica
Exactly.


-Anna Bucci

AKA Annia Minucia Marcella

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "rory12001" <rory12001@...> wrote:
>
> Salve Anna;
>
> I didn't even read it; but I'm going to write to Piscinus; just think being free of all that.....verbiage;-)
> vale
> Maior
>
> >
> > what a load of crap cato.
> >
> > What are you gonna do if NR is split? Gonna whine about it?
> >
> >
> >
> > -Anna Bucci
> >
> >
> > AKA Annia Minucia Marcella
> >
> > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Cato" <catoinnyc@> wrote:
> > >
> > > C. Equitius Cato senatore quaestore aedilis praetoris omnibus in Foro SPD
> > >
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79805 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2010-08-27
Subject: Re: de Res Publica
Yeah being free of Piscinus's wall of text that either gets alot of
information INCORRECT (like Tish B'Av) for one example. Would be an
advantage!

Yet always like the Suspended attorney, striving for the easy way out..first
the unsuccessful coup...and now this. How dedicated you are. Such
Romanitas. ROFL!!!

On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 10:22 PM, rory12001 <rory12001@...> wrote:

>
>
> Salve Anna;
>
> I didn't even read it; but I'm going to write to Piscinus; just think being
> free of all that.....verbiage;-)
> vale
> Maior
>
> >
> > what a load of crap cato.
> >
> > What are you gonna do if NR is split? Gonna whine about it?
> >
> >
> >
> > -Anna Bucci
> >
> >
> > AKA Annia Minucia Marcella
>
> >
> > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com <Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com>, "Cato"
> <catoinnyc@> wrote:
> > >
> > > C. Equitius Cato senatore quaestore aedilis praetoris omnibus in Foro
> SPD
> > >
> >
>
>
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79806 From: gualterus_graecus Date: 2010-08-27
Subject: Re: de Res Publica
Salve,

I think it would be best if the whole issue of Maior's status as a lawyer were left aside. It has already been extensively explored in previous debates and since then she has not made any reference to herself as a lawyer; therefore, raising that old bogeyman serves nothing except to potentially derail a more serious conversation.

Vale,

Gualterus

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Robert Woolwine <robert.woolwine@...> wrote:
>
> Yeah being free of Piscinus's wall of text that either gets alot of
> information INCORRECT (like Tish B'Av) for one example. Would be an
> advantage!
>
> Yet always like the Suspended attorney, striving for the easy way out..first
> the unsuccessful coup...and now this. How dedicated you are. Such
> Romanitas. ROFL!!!
>
> On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 10:22 PM, rory12001 <rory12001@...> wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > Salve Anna;
> >
> > I didn't even read it; but I'm going to write to Piscinus; just think being
> > free of all that.....verbiage;-)
> > vale
> > Maior
> >
> > >
> > > what a load of crap cato.
> > >
> > > What are you gonna do if NR is split? Gonna whine about it?
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > -Anna Bucci
> > >
> > >
> > > AKA Annia Minucia Marcella
> >
> > >
> > > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com <Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com>, "Cato"
> > <catoinnyc@> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > C. Equitius Cato senatore quaestore aedilis praetoris omnibus in Foro
> > SPD
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79807 From: GAIUS MARCIUS CRISPUS Date: 2010-08-27
Subject: Re: the partitioning of Nova Roma.
--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "lathyrus77" <lathyrus77@...> wrote:
>
> It's a reference to Monty Python that no one got apparently.


Salve Anna, et salvete omnes

Well, at least some of us are Python fans and recognised the reference.

Very appropriate too. Tiny groups of self important people with lots of talk but no hope of ever achieving anything, sitting around complaining.

When are the Augures going to do what they have been asked? Just stop this nonsense, and hold a properly constituted meeting of the Senate to discuss and sort the problems out in the correct way.

Vale, et valete optime

Crispus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79808 From: rory12001 Date: 2010-08-27
Subject: Re: de Res Publica
Salve Gualtere;
I thought he was already moderated. So how doe these malicious remarks get posted?

Or is this list a free-for-all where I get insulted by anyone and everyone?
vale
M.Hortensia Maior

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "gualterus_graecus" <waltms1@...> wrote:
>
> Salve,
>
> I think it would be best if the whole issue of Maior's status as a lawyer were left aside. It has already been extensively explored in previous debates and since then she has not made any reference to herself as a lawyer; therefore, raising that old bogeyman serves nothing except to potentially derail a more serious conversation.
>
> Vale,
>
> Gualterus
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Robert Woolwine <robert.woolwine@> wrote:
> >
> > Yeah being free of Piscinus's wall of text that either gets alot of
> > information INCORRECT (like Tish B'Av) for one example. Would be an
> > advantage!
> >
> > Yet always like the Suspended attorney, striving for the easy way out..first
> > the unsuccessful coup...and now this. How dedicated you are. Such
> > Romanitas. ROFL!!!
> >
> > On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 10:22 PM, rory12001 <rory12001@> wrote:
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > Salve Anna;
> > >
> > > I didn't even read it; but I'm going to write to Piscinus; just think being
> > > free of all that.....verbiage;-)
> > > vale
> > > Maior
> > >
> > > >
> > > > what a load of crap cato.
> > > >
> > > > What are you gonna do if NR is split? Gonna whine about it?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > -Anna Bucci
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > AKA Annia Minucia Marcella
> > >
> > > >
> > > > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com <Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com>, "Cato"
> > > <catoinnyc@> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > C. Equitius Cato senatore quaestore aedilis praetoris omnibus in Foro
> > > SPD
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79809 From: gualterus_graecus Date: 2010-08-27
Subject: Re: de Res Publica
Salve,

Why would you think he was moderated? I responded on here a couple days ago to your last request that the Praetura found nothing worthy of moderation.

Vale,

Gualterus

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "rory12001" <rory12001@...> wrote:
>
> Salve Gualtere;
> I thought he was already moderated. So how doe these malicious remarks get posted?
>
> Or is this list a free-for-all where I get insulted by anyone and everyone?
> vale
> M.Hortensia Maior
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "gualterus_graecus" <waltms1@> wrote:
> >
> > Salve,
> >
> > I think it would be best if the whole issue of Maior's status as a lawyer were left aside. It has already been extensively explored in previous debates and since then she has not made any reference to herself as a lawyer; therefore, raising that old bogeyman serves nothing except to potentially derail a more serious conversation.
> >
> > Vale,
> >
> > Gualterus
> >
> > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Robert Woolwine <robert.woolwine@> wrote:
> > >
> > > Yeah being free of Piscinus's wall of text that either gets alot of
> > > information INCORRECT (like Tish B'Av) for one example. Would be an
> > > advantage!
> > >
> > > Yet always like the Suspended attorney, striving for the easy way out..first
> > > the unsuccessful coup...and now this. How dedicated you are. Such
> > > Romanitas. ROFL!!!
> > >
> > > On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 10:22 PM, rory12001 <rory12001@> wrote:
> > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Salve Anna;
> > > >
> > > > I didn't even read it; but I'm going to write to Piscinus; just think being
> > > > free of all that.....verbiage;-)
> > > > vale
> > > > Maior
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > what a load of crap cato.
> > > > >
> > > > > What are you gonna do if NR is split? Gonna whine about it?
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > -Anna Bucci
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > AKA Annia Minucia Marcella
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com <Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com>, "Cato"
> > > > <catoinnyc@> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > C. Equitius Cato senatore quaestore aedilis praetoris omnibus in Foro
> > > > SPD
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> > >
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79810 From: luciaiuliaaquila Date: 2010-08-27
Subject: Corda Serrata Pando: Conventus - RSVP...
Corda Serrata Pando

To know Mater Venus is to know the Roman people,
Alas to know the Roman people, is to know Rome.
Venus' gifted Her children with the ability to know
Her Love intimately, to feel that Love in deep their
Very couer. O' those who open their hearts,
O' they, who truly understand, are thusly aware,
Mater Venus, they know, is very much more:

O' Giver of Life, Your Breath first we share,
As Kindly Nurturer, Your Breast first we suckle,
O' Golden Lady, You warm newborn limbs.
O' Indulgent Beauty, You nourish us,
As Whisper, guide us towards knowledge.
O' Fulfiller of Desires, You bring us to love
As Fulfiller of Vows, connubial union.

O' Auspicious Lady, You bless us with offspring
As Favorable One, bestow us with fortune.
O' Victorious Guide, our victory is granted,
And so, not earned by being distant, not beyond human,
Your Epitaphs Bear witness. Then when in our last days
Shades gather round, You Guide the Departed
Our last breath profound.

After the foam of the Sea she was named,
So primordial a Birth, but still it is She
Who baths with the Graces, shares laughter
With Nymphs who dance within raindrops.
She is Amica, She is Heavenly, Her Bottom is Fair,
Tresses so lovely yet She gives of Her Own, to Her
Children who lost theirs, with nary a Tear.

With Myrtle in Hand, so sacred to Her, She stirs
Her chicks' nest as Eagles will do, urging them
Onward to prove they are best. So when they are ill,
She besets them with maggots to eat out the rot, purify
Wounds, to conquer what ails. Tis' the warfare of love.
Her compassion unquestioned, legend Her kindness,
O' Mater Venus, O' Daughter of Jove!

Stoically detached, at times perhaps, as mothers should be
For the occasional mishap; but she Cries, Her Heart breaks. At
Troy not in shame did She leave. Beloved Child Aeneas from
Her Arms did fall, Her wound spilt Ichor, from her Heart Tears.
Apollo embraced him, when forced was She from the field, to
Her no Consolation, Their attachment so strong, as to all of Her
Children, whether right or whether wrong.

O' Celestial One guide us and please light our way
Show us how to be comrades O' Bride of the Gods!
Her children in discord, Verticordia, O' Changer of hearts,
Whispers of hope by tender persuasion as water creates
Graceful forms upon rocks, for all with closed hearts. Whispers
Brave Libertina to all who confine the Roman within:
"Corda Serrata Pando"
"I open locked hearts"


27August 2010 ® © Aquila



--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Publius Ullerius Stephanus Venator <famila.ulleria.venii@...> wrote:
>
> Venus is Love, beyond human
> Feeling, knowing, reaching the core
> In some this is, whole and wholesome
> In others it is, fit for maggots
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79811 From: Kirsteen Wright Date: 2010-08-27
Subject: Re: Toga Pulla help
On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 2:48 AM, rory12001 <rory12001@...> wrote:

> Maior omnibus spd;
> I found a supplier of seemingly nice linen, would anyone have an idea
> how much fabric I'd need for a republican toga for someone of my height:
> I'm 157.5 cm or 62 inches.
>
>
This site

http://rabbitoriginals.com/toga/

gives diagrams and also a measurement generator. You put in your
measurements (neck to floor and waist) and allegedly it gives you the
measurements you need. I haven't tried it so can't guarantee it.

cheers
Merula


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79812 From: Publius Ullerius Stephanus Venator Date: 2010-08-27
Subject: Re: Corda Serrata Pando: Conventus - RSVP...
Salve Aquila;

On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 4:36 AM, luciaiuliaaquila wrote:
>
>
>
> Corda Serrata Pando
>
> To know Mater Venus is to know the Roman people,
> Alas to know the Roman people, is to know Rome.
> Venus' gifted Her children with the ability to know
> Her Love intimately, to feel that Love in deep their
> Very couer. O' those who open their hearts,
> O' they, who truly understand, are thusly aware,
> Mater Venus, they know, is very much more:
>
> [respectful excision]

Brava!

bene vale - Venator
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79813 From: marcushoratius Date: 2010-08-27
Subject: a. d. VI Kalendas Septembris: VOLTURNALIA
M. Moravius Piscinus Pontifex Maximus Quiritibus cultoribus Deorum et omnibus salutem plurimam dicit: Curate ut valeatis, et Di vos servent.

Hodie est ante diem VI Kalendas Septembres; haec dies nefastus piaculum est: Volturnalia

VOLTURNALIA

Of the ritual made this day for Volturnus nothing is known. Varro lists a flamen Volturnalis among others, but tells us no more about him or of the God he served. There was some suggestion by Mommsen and followed by Fowler that Volturnus was an older name for the River Tiber. In fact Servius said that the pontifices alone were in the habit of calling the river Tiberinus but does not mention by which other name the river was called (Aeneis 8.330). There was a River Volturnus in Campania, and in Apulia there is reference to a mount or a river named for this God, but He remains as much an enigma in these references as does Summanus. Instead we turn elsewhere to find Volturnus identified with arid south easterly winds that give rise to dusty whirlwinds in late summer and fall. First there is T. Lucretius Carus discussing the change of seasons in De Rerum Natura (5.741-745) as though it were a battle between winds.

Whereafter follows arid Calor, and he
Companioned is by Ceres, dusty one,
And by the Etesian Breezes of the north
At rising of the Dog-Star of the year;
Then cometh Autumn on, and with him steps
Lord Bacchus, and then other Seasons too
And other Tempests do follow - the high roar
Of great Volturnus, and Auster strong
With thunder-bolts.

The rise of Siris, the Dog-Star, was met with the sacrum canarium to spare crops of disease and the damaging heat of late summer (Pliny Hist. Nat. 18.14). His rise occurred in early August in the Julian calendar, and presently rises around 23 August in the Gregorian calendar. Columella tells of the arrival of the easterly Eurus winds around 17 September "when it is named Vulturnus (De Re Rustica 11.2.64: XV Kal. Oct.)."

Seneca noted, "(Greek) Eurus comes from the winter sunrise (south east), a wind which our people call Vulturnus:T. Livius calls it by this name in connection with the famous battle that was a disaster for the Romans when Hannibal defeated our army which was drawn up facing into the rising sun and the wind. He had the help of the wind and the glare that dazzled the eyes of his enemy. Varro also uses the name Vulturnus (L. Annaeus Seneca, Naturales Quaestiones 5.16.4)."

Seneca above refers to this passage in Livy:

"It was in the neighborhood of this village (Cannae) that Hannibal had fixed his camp with his back to the Sirocco whirl-winds which blows from Vulturnus and fills the arid plains with clouds of dust." ~ Titus Livius 22.43.10

"In the same way (as a river) the wind blows in full force as long as nothing obstructs it. When it is beaten back by some projecting height or is collected in the thin downward channel of a canyon, the wind often revolves upon itself and makes an eddy similar to those waters which we said are altered into whirlpools. This wind, revolving and passing round the same spot and gathering momentum by its very rotation is a whirlwind. If it is fairly violent and has been revolving a fairly long time, it ignites and makes what the Greeks call Prester; that is, a fiery whirlwind. Winds that have burst their way from the clouds generally produce all the disasters whereby tackle is carried away and entire ships are lifted into the air." ~ L. Annaeus Seneca, Naturales Quaestiones 5.13.1-3

"For a whirlwind isconceived and carried along near the earth; thus it tears up trees by the roots, and wherenver it is pressed hard it lays bare the ground, meanwhile carrying off forests and houses. It is generally lower than the clouds, certainly never higher." ~ L. Annaeus Seneca, Naturales Quaestiones 7.5.1

Thus from the little that can be discerned, Volturnus was seen as the lesser god, like Robigo, of those winds that came from the southeast in late summer or early fall with threats of destructive whirlwinds. On Voltunalia then we may pose, although without certainty, that the flamen Volturnalis made a sacrifice to Volturnus, in order to avert the ill effects of the harsh, dry winds of this season and prevent dust storms and whirlwinds, such as brought disaster at the Battle of Cannae earlier in this month.


AUC 692 / 61 BCE: LEX FUFIA DE RELIGIONE

"However, when Hortensius hit on the idea of a law as to the sacrilege being proposed by the tribune Fufius, in which there was no difference from the bill of the consul except as to the kind of jurymen." ~ Cicero, Ad Atticus 1.16

In December of 63 BCE Clodius was seen in Caesar's house during the women's rites for the Bona Dea. The Vestales and Pontifex Maximus dismissed the matter, but political rivals pushed for a trial of Clodius. There was no precedent, no tribunal established to deal with such cases. A proposal was made in the Senate to create a special tribunal just for this single incident. Piso and Curio opposed the measure. Cicero pushed for it. The Tribune Fufio eventually vetoed the first measure. A problem was that juries were selected by the praetor who held the tribunal. With the Senate so divided, and juries selected with senators forming a third of their members, no jury could be chosen by a praetor without some bias being put into it either for or against Clodius.

The solution proposed by Hortensius was to have the Tribune Fufio propose a lex whereby a special quaestio de religione was instituted as a tribunal to hear cases involving violations of religious law and profanination of religious rites. The special feature of this tribunal was that its jury was chosen by lot, its members chosen from three decuriae of senators, equites and tribuni aerarii. The reason for this was to place the Gods Themselves over the selection of a jury as drawing lots is a form of augury and a means of communicating with the Gods on Their choices.


Our thought for today is from Democritus, The Golden Sayings 57:

"Conduct yourself to all men without suspicion; and be accommodating and cautious in your behavior."



Religio_Romana_Cultorum_Deorum-subscribe@yahoogroups.com

_____________________
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79814 From: marcushoratius Date: 2010-08-27
Subject: Re: de Res Publica
Salve Cato

From whence did this idea of "partitioning" the Respublica come? None other than from the Back Ally Boys. The same people who spoke of Civil War, coups, and revolution against the Res Publica - Sulla, Fabius Maximus, Metellus, Valerianus, Gualterus, and Cn. Caesar, with former citizens Octavius, Diana Aventina, and Poplicola. And you were there, too, if only to raise your objection in the Back Alley first.

Octavius Gracchus wrote to those Back Alley Boys:

"Face it - there will be *no* *peace* while Piscinus remains."

Well, maybe the truth is that there can be no peace in Nova Roma as long as these few people from the Back Alley and former citizens are allowed to remain among us.

These are the people who last June discussed conducting a coup to depose our elected officials and the members of the Collegia, and who want to purge the Senate of the majority of its members. Realizing that their coup attempt would never succeed against the majority, they began discussing partition so that they could bring back their version of "Nova Roma Classic." The very version that so many left and that so many of us who remain fought against - including you I am told.

So, if you do not support partition of Nova Roma, if you want peace restored, what is the answer? Side with those who plot against the Res Publica? With those who plot to depose elected officials? With those who attack our Sacerdotes with slurs and insults in a campaign to rid the Collegia of cultores Deorum and depose those adlected into even our most sacred offices? Knowing that they can never win against majority rule, failing in their attempt at a coup, what do they now seek to take from Nova Roma? In the words of former citizen Octavius who laid out this latest Back Alley plot:

"We don't get to the use the NR name, but they don't get to use it either; each group gets half the treasury and as many citizens as are willing to climb aboard."

I see. No one gets to keep the name Nova Roma. If they don't want the name, then why remain here? As many Citizens as they can possibly attract? Election results each year show just how very few Citizens of Nova Roma they attract. So, half of our treasury seems to be their goal. It comes down to them wanting to be paid to depart from Nova Roma.

In my opinion the answer is not so much a partition of Nova Roma as it is a parting of the ways of Res Publica nostra and those BABies from the Back Alley who have disrupted Nova Roma.

Vale

M. Moravius Piscinus

Senator Consularius
Pontifex Maximus
Magister Collegi Augurum


--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Cato" <catoinnyc@...> wrote:
>
> C. Equitius Cato senatore quaestore aedilis praetoris omnibus in Foro SPD
>
> Over the past few days there has been much (serious) talk of the idea of dividing the Respublica along political factions; details about who can call themselves what and to whom the aerarium should be dispersed; the invocation of the macronational laws under which we are governed suddenly has become important to many of those who ignored or actively opposed obedience to those laws.
>
> I say enough.
>
> I will not, and cannot, support the destruction of the Respublica simply because those who ridicule the very basic laws and governing acts under which we operate see it as a convenient way out; nor because those who have fought long and hard to uphold the law feel that there can be no justice in this, *our* Respublica.
>
> I am on the vanguard of those who have been despised and abused by those who seek to do us the most harm. I have spoken often, at great - some might say nauseatingly so - length about the need, the fundamental requirement, of those of us who have become citizens to uphold the common law in an effort to grasp in whatever way we can, the idea of being, and living as, Romans in a modern era.
>
> I have been told that I am hated, despised, by those who currently hold power in our government; that I will never be elected to office again because the stranglehold held by those in power is too strong, too entrenched, to ever be broken and their hold over the minds of you, the People, is too strong.
>
> I don't care.
>
> I will continue to fight, to argue, to declaim, to speak freely in opposition to those who would see our Respublica sink into the mire of totalitarianism. I don't care if I never sit in the curule chair again, but I will *not* give up on the vision I have of a functioning, civilized and civilizing beacon of the values that took the vast, dark, ignorant world into a place of order, of law, of community.
>
> Perhaps those who have tried repeatedly over the past few years to emasculate and destroy our Respublica will never have to answer for their crimes. Is this reason enough to rend the garment of the community we have built? Should we not, instead, seek to end their seemingly endless grasping at power and authority, and reclaim what is rightfully the inheritance of the *whole* Respublica - a seamless garment woven by the work and industry and faith of those who seek to build a better place?
>
> I am a citizen of the Respublica. I am a senator of the Respublica. While I have breath in my body, I will *never* bow to the corruption and destruction of our community - even if I am jeered at and made the subject of the most base abuses conceivable. I hereby vow that I shall not rest, I shall not seek solace or comfort, I shall not seek rest or respite, until those who have brought such infamy upon our Respublica shall be brought to *our* justice.
>
> I call upon our citizens, our senators, our magistrates, to reject the idea that tearing apart the Respublica will serve any kind of profitable end. This is *my* home, *my* Respublica. I will defend it to my last breath.
>
> Valete,
>
> Gaius Equitius Cato
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79815 From: GAIUS MARCIUS CRISPUS Date: 2010-08-27
Subject: Re: de Res Publica
--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "marcushoratius" <MHoratius@...> wrote:
>

> From whence did this idea of "partitioning" the Respublica come? None other than from the Back Ally Boys.

Salve Senator

I read your message, and that of Cato, with interest.

As a citizen, I am very unhappy about what is going on, and wish to see the rule of law restored, and action taken in accordance with the constitution so that we can move forward and deal with the problems as one united Republic.

It seems to me that the first thing we need is for the Senate to be called to debate the situation and work out a programme to deal with it. Maybe the Senate is itself divided to such an extent that no useful solutions would be agreed.

But as an ordinary citizen I cannot understand why, when auspices have been requested, none have been taken. Can you explain this to me? What is the point of having augurs if they do not do their job?
At the very least I would like to see a proper debate among the leaders of our state, properly called, and properly reported.

Can someone please tell me why we cannot have the auspices taken and the Senate called for a properly constitutional session?

If you prefer not to reply in this open list, please do e-mail me privately.

Vale, et valete omnes.

Crispus
"Then none was for a party, then all were for the state".
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79816 From: Cato Date: 2010-08-27
Subject: Re: de Res Publica
Cato Piscino sal.

First, you should stop using the Back Alley as a springboard for your reasoning. If it is the nest of horror you continually claim it to be, peopled only by unscrupulous and irrational "BABies", then it really shouldn't matter what is said in the Back Alley, should it?

Second, I remind you again that there are several women on the Back Alley List and you continually refer to them as "boys". Either simply ignorant and incorrect, or ... Freudian? :)

Last, as the single greatest driving force behind the most recent attempt to destroy the civil government of the Respublica, it ill behooves you to blather on about corruption and coups.

You have shown no respect for our laws, the laws of the country in which we are incorporated, or the gods of Rome - for whom you claim such deep reverence that you would crush those who disagree with your ill-conceived plotting by using Their majesty and power as a tool of fear and extortion.

You seem to see yourself as a Julius II, charging into battle using the weapons of the Church and earthly powers to crush any refusal to submit to your will in the Name of (the) God(s); do not forget the incredible damage wrought by that pope to the emotional and psychological inheritance of the same Church. Seeing a Roman pontiff covered in the blood of his enemies was a shocking sight, and still is.

In truth, you are more of an Alexander VI, a bloated and corrupt Borgia surrounding himself with cronies and lick-spittles, squandering away what little good will remained while around him anarchy and destruction blossomed. Yes, you may ride "triumphant" around in Rome on an elephant, but it is a Rome much degraded and spoiled by your insatiable lust for power. It was said of Alexander:

"Now we are in the power of a wolf, the most rapacious perhaps that this world has ever seen. And if we do not flee, he will inevitably devour us all."

But rather than flee, I stand against *our* wolf.

Vale,

Cato



--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "marcushoratius" <MHoratius@...> wrote:
>
> Salve Cato
>
> From whence did this idea of "partitioning" the Respublica come? None other than from the Back Ally Boys. The same people who spoke of Civil War, coups, and revolution against the Res Publica - Sulla, Fabius Maximus, Metellus, Valerianus, Gualterus, and Cn. Caesar, with former citizens Octavius, Diana Aventina, and Poplicola. And you were there, too, if only to raise your objection in the Back Alley first.
>
> Octavius Gracchus wrote to those Back Alley Boys:
>
> "Face it - there will be *no* *peace* while Piscinus remains."
>
> Well, maybe the truth is that there can be no peace in Nova Roma as long as these few people from the Back Alley and former citizens are allowed to remain among us.
>
> These are the people who last June discussed conducting a coup to depose our elected officials and the members of the Collegia, and who want to purge the Senate of the majority of its members. Realizing that their coup attempt would never succeed against the majority, they began discussing partition so that they could bring back their version of "Nova Roma Classic." The very version that so many left and that so many of us who remain fought against - including you I am told.
>
> So, if you do not support partition of Nova Roma, if you want peace restored, what is the answer? Side with those who plot against the Res Publica? With those who plot to depose elected officials? With those who attack our Sacerdotes with slurs and insults in a campaign to rid the Collegia of cultores Deorum and depose those adlected into even our most sacred offices? Knowing that they can never win against majority rule, failing in their attempt at a coup, what do they now seek to take from Nova Roma? In the words of former citizen Octavius who laid out this latest Back Alley plot:
>
> "We don't get to the use the NR name, but they don't get to use it either; each group gets half the treasury and as many citizens as are willing to climb aboard."
>
> I see. No one gets to keep the name Nova Roma. If they don't want the name, then why remain here? As many Citizens as they can possibly attract? Election results each year show just how very few Citizens of Nova Roma they attract. So, half of our treasury seems to be their goal. It comes down to them wanting to be paid to depart from Nova Roma.
>
> In my opinion the answer is not so much a partition of Nova Roma as it is a parting of the ways of Res Publica nostra and those BABies from the Back Alley who have disrupted Nova Roma.
>
> Vale
>
> M. Moravius Piscinus
>
> Senator Consularius
> Pontifex Maximus
> Magister Collegi Augurum
>
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Cato" <catoinnyc@> wrote:
> >
> > C. Equitius Cato senatore quaestore aedilis praetoris omnibus in Foro SPD
> >
> > Over the past few days there has been much (serious) talk of the idea of dividing the Respublica along political factions; details about who can call themselves what and to whom the aerarium should be dispersed; the invocation of the macronational laws under which we are governed suddenly has become important to many of those who ignored or actively opposed obedience to those laws.
> >
> > I say enough.
> >
> > I will not, and cannot, support the destruction of the Respublica simply because those who ridicule the very basic laws and governing acts under which we operate see it as a convenient way out; nor because those who have fought long and hard to uphold the law feel that there can be no justice in this, *our* Respublica.
> >
> > I am on the vanguard of those who have been despised and abused by those who seek to do us the most harm. I have spoken often, at great - some might say nauseatingly so - length about the need, the fundamental requirement, of those of us who have become citizens to uphold the common law in an effort to grasp in whatever way we can, the idea of being, and living as, Romans in a modern era.
> >
> > I have been told that I am hated, despised, by those who currently hold power in our government; that I will never be elected to office again because the stranglehold held by those in power is too strong, too entrenched, to ever be broken and their hold over the minds of you, the People, is too strong.
> >
> > I don't care.
> >
> > I will continue to fight, to argue, to declaim, to speak freely in opposition to those who would see our Respublica sink into the mire of totalitarianism. I don't care if I never sit in the curule chair again, but I will *not* give up on the vision I have of a functioning, civilized and civilizing beacon of the values that took the vast, dark, ignorant world into a place of order, of law, of community.
> >
> > Perhaps those who have tried repeatedly over the past few years to emasculate and destroy our Respublica will never have to answer for their crimes. Is this reason enough to rend the garment of the community we have built? Should we not, instead, seek to end their seemingly endless grasping at power and authority, and reclaim what is rightfully the inheritance of the *whole* Respublica - a seamless garment woven by the work and industry and faith of those who seek to build a better place?
> >
> > I am a citizen of the Respublica. I am a senator of the Respublica. While I have breath in my body, I will *never* bow to the corruption and destruction of our community - even if I am jeered at and made the subject of the most base abuses conceivable. I hereby vow that I shall not rest, I shall not seek solace or comfort, I shall not seek rest or respite, until those who have brought such infamy upon our Respublica shall be brought to *our* justice.
> >
> > I call upon our citizens, our senators, our magistrates, to reject the idea that tearing apart the Respublica will serve any kind of profitable end. This is *my* home, *my* Respublica. I will defend it to my last breath.
> >
> > Valete,
> >
> > Gaius Equitius Cato
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79817 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2010-08-27
Subject: Re: de Res Publica
Yo Antipope,

What does that make Hortensia since she wanted to Dissolve the corporation?
Given your rationale she should be WORSE than a member of the BA. ;) Be
consistent for once - I know something entirely foreign for you! Since she
started this entire concept because her plan to try to get you an expense
free trip to the Conventus failed in the senate!

She seems to view the NR treasury as her personal bank account!

Vale,

Sulla

On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 4:21 AM, marcushoratius <MHoratius@...>wrote:

>
>
> Salve Cato
>
> From whence did this idea of "partitioning" the Respublica come? None other
> than from the Back Ally Boys. The same people who spoke of Civil War, coups,
> and revolution against the Res Publica - Sulla, Fabius Maximus, Metellus,
> Valerianus, Gualterus, and Cn. Caesar, with former citizens Octavius, Diana
> Aventina, and Poplicola. And you were there, too, if only to raise your
> objection in the Back Alley first.
>
> Octavius Gracchus wrote to those Back Alley Boys:
>
> "Face it - there will be *no* *peace* while Piscinus remains."
>
> Well, maybe the truth is that there can be no peace in Nova Roma as long as
> these few people from the Back Alley and former citizens are allowed to
> remain among us.
>
> These are the people who last June discussed conducting a coup to depose
> our elected officials and the members of the Collegia, and who want to purge
> the Senate of the majority of its members. Realizing that their coup attempt
> would never succeed against the majority, they began discussing partition so
> that they could bring back their version of "Nova Roma Classic." The very
> version that so many left and that so many of us who remain fought against -
> including you I am told.
>
> So, if you do not support partition of Nova Roma, if you want peace
> restored, what is the answer? Side with those who plot against the Res
> Publica? With those who plot to depose elected officials? With those who
> attack our Sacerdotes with slurs and insults in a campaign to rid the
> Collegia of cultores Deorum and depose those adlected into even our most
> sacred offices? Knowing that they can never win against majority rule,
> failing in their attempt at a coup, what do they now seek to take from Nova
> Roma? In the words of former citizen Octavius who laid out this latest Back
> Alley plot:
>
> "We don't get to the use the NR name, but they don't get to use it either;
> each group gets half the treasury and as many citizens as are willing to
> climb aboard."
>
> I see. No one gets to keep the name Nova Roma. If they don't want the name,
> then why remain here? As many Citizens as they can possibly attract?
> Election results each year show just how very few Citizens of Nova Roma they
> attract. So, half of our treasury seems to be their goal. It comes down to
> them wanting to be paid to depart from Nova Roma.
>
> In my opinion the answer is not so much a partition of Nova Roma as it is a
> parting of the ways of Res Publica nostra and those BABies from the Back
> Alley who have disrupted Nova Roma.
>
> Vale
>
> M. Moravius Piscinus
>
> Senator Consularius
> Pontifex Maximus
> Magister Collegi Augurum
>
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com <Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com>, "Cato"
> <catoinnyc@...> wrote:
> >
> > C. Equitius Cato senatore quaestore aedilis praetoris omnibus in Foro SPD
> >
> > Over the past few days there has been much (serious) talk of the idea of
> dividing the Respublica along political factions; details about who can call
> themselves what and to whom the aerarium should be dispersed; the invocation
> of the macronational laws under which we are governed suddenly has become
> important to many of those who ignored or actively opposed obedience to
> those laws.
> >
> > I say enough.
> >
> > I will not, and cannot, support the destruction of the Respublica simply
> because those who ridicule the very basic laws and governing acts under
> which we operate see it as a convenient way out; nor because those who have
> fought long and hard to uphold the law feel that there can be no justice in
> this, *our* Respublica.
> >
> > I am on the vanguard of those who have been despised and abused by those
> who seek to do us the most harm. I have spoken often, at great - some might
> say nauseatingly so - length about the need, the fundamental requirement, of
> those of us who have become citizens to uphold the common law in an effort
> to grasp in whatever way we can, the idea of being, and living as, Romans in
> a modern era.
> >
> > I have been told that I am hated, despised, by those who currently hold
> power in our government; that I will never be elected to office again
> because the stranglehold held by those in power is too strong, too
> entrenched, to ever be broken and their hold over the minds of you, the
> People, is too strong.
> >
> > I don't care.
> >
> > I will continue to fight, to argue, to declaim, to speak freely in
> opposition to those who would see our Respublica sink into the mire of
> totalitarianism. I don't care if I never sit in the curule chair again, but
> I will *not* give up on the vision I have of a functioning, civilized and
> civilizing beacon of the values that took the vast, dark, ignorant world
> into a place of order, of law, of community.
> >
> > Perhaps those who have tried repeatedly over the past few years to
> emasculate and destroy our Respublica will never have to answer for their
> crimes. Is this reason enough to rend the garment of the community we have
> built? Should we not, instead, seek to end their seemingly endless grasping
> at power and authority, and reclaim what is rightfully the inheritance of
> the *whole* Respublica - a seamless garment woven by the work and industry
> and faith of those who seek to build a better place?
> >
> > I am a citizen of the Respublica. I am a senator of the Respublica. While
> I have breath in my body, I will *never* bow to the corruption and
> destruction of our community - even if I am jeered at and made the subject
> of the most base abuses conceivable. I hereby vow that I shall not rest, I
> shall not seek solace or comfort, I shall not seek rest or respite, until
> those who have brought such infamy upon our Respublica shall be brought to
> *our* justice.
> >
> > I call upon our citizens, our senators, our magistrates, to reject the
> idea that tearing apart the Respublica will serve any kind of profitable
> end. This is *my* home, *my* Respublica. I will defend it to my last breath.
> >
> > Valete,
> >
> > Gaius Equitius Cato
> >
>
>
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79818 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2010-08-27
Subject: Re: de Res Publica
The antipope fears the BA. That is why he calls us BABies in public yet
cant stop his worrying over what goes on in the BA. LOL If we were BABies
nothing we would say could possibly matter, but the problem is we do. And
since their version of peace is precisely like Tactus (you make a desert and
call it peace) - and it is unreachable....this is all he has left to
scheme. And he fails, just like he failed at trying to extort us, just
like he failed at the coup.

Vale,

Sulla

On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 7:59 AM, Cato <catoinnyc@...> wrote:

>
>
> Cato Piscino sal.
>
> First, you should stop using the Back Alley as a springboard for your
> reasoning. If it is the nest of horror you continually claim it to be,
> peopled only by unscrupulous and irrational "BABies", then it really
> shouldn't matter what is said in the Back Alley, should it?
>
> Second, I remind you again that there are several women on the Back Alley
> List and you continually refer to them as "boys". Either simply ignorant and
> incorrect, or ... Freudian? :)
>
> Last, as the single greatest driving force behind the most recent attempt
> to destroy the civil government of the Respublica, it ill behooves you to
> blather on about corruption and coups.
>
> You have shown no respect for our laws, the laws of the country in which we
> are incorporated, or the gods of Rome - for whom you claim such deep
> reverence that you would crush those who disagree with your ill-conceived
> plotting by using Their majesty and power as a tool of fear and extortion.
>
> You seem to see yourself as a Julius II, charging into battle using the
> weapons of the Church and earthly powers to crush any refusal to submit to
> your will in the Name of (the) God(s); do not forget the incredible damage
> wrought by that pope to the emotional and psychological inheritance of the
> same Church. Seeing a Roman pontiff covered in the blood of his enemies was
> a shocking sight, and still is.
>
> In truth, you are more of an Alexander VI, a bloated and corrupt Borgia
> surrounding himself with cronies and lick-spittles, squandering away what
> little good will remained while around him anarchy and destruction
> blossomed. Yes, you may ride "triumphant" around in Rome on an elephant, but
> it is a Rome much degraded and spoiled by your insatiable lust for power. It
> was said of Alexander:
>
> "Now we are in the power of a wolf, the most rapacious perhaps that this
> world has ever seen. And if we do not flee, he will inevitably devour us
> all."
>
> But rather than flee, I stand against *our* wolf.
>
> Vale,
>
> Cato
>
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com <Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com>,
> "marcushoratius" <MHoratius@...> wrote:
> >
> > Salve Cato
> >
> > From whence did this idea of "partitioning" the Respublica come? None
> other than from the Back Ally Boys. The same people who spoke of Civil War,
> coups, and revolution against the Res Publica - Sulla, Fabius Maximus,
> Metellus, Valerianus, Gualterus, and Cn. Caesar, with former citizens
> Octavius, Diana Aventina, and Poplicola. And you were there, too, if only to
> raise your objection in the Back Alley first.
> >
> > Octavius Gracchus wrote to those Back Alley Boys:
> >
> > "Face it - there will be *no* *peace* while Piscinus remains."
> >
> > Well, maybe the truth is that there can be no peace in Nova Roma as long
> as these few people from the Back Alley and former citizens are allowed to
> remain among us.
> >
> > These are the people who last June discussed conducting a coup to depose
> our elected officials and the members of the Collegia, and who want to purge
> the Senate of the majority of its members. Realizing that their coup attempt
> would never succeed against the majority, they began discussing partition so
> that they could bring back their version of "Nova Roma Classic." The very
> version that so many left and that so many of us who remain fought against -
> including you I am told.
> >
> > So, if you do not support partition of Nova Roma, if you want peace
> restored, what is the answer? Side with those who plot against the Res
> Publica? With those who plot to depose elected officials? With those who
> attack our Sacerdotes with slurs and insults in a campaign to rid the
> Collegia of cultores Deorum and depose those adlected into even our most
> sacred offices? Knowing that they can never win against majority rule,
> failing in their attempt at a coup, what do they now seek to take from Nova
> Roma? In the words of former citizen Octavius who laid out this latest Back
> Alley plot:
> >
> > "We don't get to the use the NR name, but they don't get to use it
> either; each group gets half the treasury and as many citizens as are
> willing to climb aboard."
> >
> > I see. No one gets to keep the name Nova Roma. If they don't want the
> name, then why remain here? As many Citizens as they can possibly attract?
> Election results each year show just how very few Citizens of Nova Roma they
> attract. So, half of our treasury seems to be their goal. It comes down to
> them wanting to be paid to depart from Nova Roma.
> >
> > In my opinion the answer is not so much a partition of Nova Roma as it is
> a parting of the ways of Res Publica nostra and those BABies from the Back
> Alley who have disrupted Nova Roma.
> >
> > Vale
> >
> > M. Moravius Piscinus
> >
> > Senator Consularius
> > Pontifex Maximus
> > Magister Collegi Augurum
> >
> >
> > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com <Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com>, "Cato"
> <catoinnyc@> wrote:
> > >
> > > C. Equitius Cato senatore quaestore aedilis praetoris omnibus in Foro
> SPD
> > >
> > > Over the past few days there has been much (serious) talk of the idea
> of dividing the Respublica along political factions; details about who can
> call themselves what and to whom the aerarium should be dispersed; the
> invocation of the macronational laws under which we are governed suddenly
> has become important to many of those who ignored or actively opposed
> obedience to those laws.
> > >
> > > I say enough.
> > >
> > > I will not, and cannot, support the destruction of the Respublica
> simply because those who ridicule the very basic laws and governing acts
> under which we operate see it as a convenient way out; nor because those who
> have fought long and hard to uphold the law feel that there can be no
> justice in this, *our* Respublica.
> > >
> > > I am on the vanguard of those who have been despised and abused by
> those who seek to do us the most harm. I have spoken often, at great - some
> might say nauseatingly so - length about the need, the fundamental
> requirement, of those of us who have become citizens to uphold the common
> law in an effort to grasp in whatever way we can, the idea of being, and
> living as, Romans in a modern era.
> > >
> > > I have been told that I am hated, despised, by those who currently hold
> power in our government; that I will never be elected to office again
> because the stranglehold held by those in power is too strong, too
> entrenched, to ever be broken and their hold over the minds of you, the
> People, is too strong.
> > >
> > > I don't care.
> > >
> > > I will continue to fight, to argue, to declaim, to speak freely in
> opposition to those who would see our Respublica sink into the mire of
> totalitarianism. I don't care if I never sit in the curule chair again, but
> I will *not* give up on the vision I have of a functioning, civilized and
> civilizing beacon of the values that took the vast, dark, ignorant world
> into a place of order, of law, of community.
> > >
> > > Perhaps those who have tried repeatedly over the past few years to
> emasculate and destroy our Respublica will never have to answer for their
> crimes. Is this reason enough to rend the garment of the community we have
> built? Should we not, instead, seek to end their seemingly endless grasping
> at power and authority, and reclaim what is rightfully the inheritance of
> the *whole* Respublica - a seamless garment woven by the work and industry
> and faith of those who seek to build a better place?
> > >
> > > I am a citizen of the Respublica. I am a senator of the Respublica.
> While I have breath in my body, I will *never* bow to the corruption and
> destruction of our community - even if I am jeered at and made the subject
> of the most base abuses conceivable. I hereby vow that I shall not rest, I
> shall not seek solace or comfort, I shall not seek rest or respite, until
> those who have brought such infamy upon our Respublica shall be brought to
> *our* justice.
> > >
> > > I call upon our citizens, our senators, our magistrates, to reject the
> idea that tearing apart the Respublica will serve any kind of profitable
> end. This is *my* home, *my* Respublica. I will defend it to my last breath.
> > >
> > > Valete,
> > >
> > > Gaius Equitius Cato
> > >
> >
>
>
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79819 From: petronius_dexter Date: 2010-08-27
Subject: Re: Corda Serrata Pando: Conventus - RSVP...
C. Petronius L. Juliae s.p.d.,

> To know Mater Venus is to know the Roman people,
> Alas to know the Roman people, is to know Rome.
> Venus' gifted Her children with the ability to know
> Her Love intimately, to feel that Love in deep their
> Very couer. O' those who open their hearts,
> O' they, who truly understand, are thusly aware,
> Mater Venus, they know, is very much more:

I would like understand how English poems work. It is so different with French poetry that I need some courses. Apparently you are free with number of syllabs, free with rhyme... is a poetry like ancient Roman with metres?

Optime vale.

C. Petronius Dexter
Arcoiali scribebat
a. d. VI Kalendas Septembres P. Memmio K. Fabio II coss.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79820 From: lathyrus77 Date: 2010-08-27
Subject: Re: de Res Publica
And this is why partitioning would be best. The cancer of NR will never leave.








--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Robert Woolwine <robert.woolwine@...> wrote:
>
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79821 From: deciusiunius Date: 2010-08-27
Subject: Re: the partitioning of Nova Roma.
--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "rory12001" <rory12001@...> wrote:
>
> Salve Palladi;
> if you read the Maine statute either the funds get returned to >all the members or transferred to a similar org. You must respect the >intent of the givers.

Can you think of a similar org? I can't. Unless it is some educational organization like a university. Maybe establish a classics scholarship program at a US and European university?

Frankly any splinter org vying for funds would just create yet more fighting. The only way to do it is put the money out of everyone's reach, give the Founders the name back with a provision it can't be used for so many years, perhaps 5 to 12. That's it, it's over. I doubt that would be acceptable to many on both sides because they want the cash to fund their own groups.

If we're going to talk about dissolving then do it, all the way, no half measures. Otherwise then let's save the damn thing.

Vale,

Palladius
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79822 From: lathyrus77 Date: 2010-08-27
Subject: Re: the partitioning of Nova Roma.
Would living history org be similar?



--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "deciusiunius" <bcatfd@...> wrote:
>
>
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "rory12001" <rory12001@> wrote:
> >
> > Salve Palladi;
> > if you read the Maine statute either the funds get returned to >all the members or transferred to a similar org. You must respect the >intent of the givers.
>
> Can you think of a similar org? I can't. Unless it is some educational organization like a university. Maybe establish a classics scholarship program at a US and European university?
>
> Frankly any splinter org vying for funds would just create yet more fighting. The only way to do it is put the money out of everyone's reach, give the Founders the name back with a provision it can't be used for so many years, perhaps 5 to 12. That's it, it's over. I doubt that would be acceptable to many on both sides because they want the cash to fund their own groups.
>
> If we're going to talk about dissolving then do it, all the way, no half measures. Otherwise then let's save the damn thing.
>
> Vale,
>
> Palladius
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79823 From: luciaiuliaaquila Date: 2010-08-27
Subject: Re: Corda Serrata Pando: Conventus - RSVP...
Salve Venii!

Gratias tibi! Wouldn't be nice if we all could have discussions expressing ourselves through prose!

Vale optime,

Julia

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Publius Ullerius Stephanus Venator <famila.ulleria.venii@...> wrote:
>
> Salve Aquila;
>
> On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 4:36 AM, luciaiuliaaquila wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > Corda Serrata Pando
> >
> > To know Mater Venus is to know the Roman people,
> > Alas to know the Roman people, is to know Rome.
> > Venus' gifted Her children with the ability to know
> > Her Love intimately, to feel that Love in deep their
> > Very couer. O' those who open their hearts,
> > O' they, who truly understand, are thusly aware,
> > Mater Venus, they know, is very much more:
> >
> > [respectful excision]
>
> Brava!
>
> bene vale - Venator
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79824 From: deciusiunius Date: 2010-08-27
Subject: Re: the partitioning of Nova Roma.
--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "lathyrus77" <lathyrus77@...> wrote:
>
> Would living history org be similar?


Like Roman reenactment Legions? Yeah, that could work too.





Palladius





>
>
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "deciusiunius" <bcatfd@> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "rory12001" <rory12001@> wrote:
> > >
> > > Salve Palladi;
> > > if you read the Maine statute either the funds get returned to >all the members or transferred to a similar org. You must respect the >intent of the givers.
> >
> > Can you think of a similar org? I can't. Unless it is some educational organization like a university. Maybe establish a classics scholarship program at a US and European university?
> >
> > Frankly any splinter org vying for funds would just create yet more fighting. The only way to do it is put the money out of everyone's reach, give the Founders the name back with a provision it can't be used for so many years, perhaps 5 to 12. That's it, it's over. I doubt that would be acceptable to many on both sides because they want the cash to fund their own groups.
> >
> > If we're going to talk about dissolving then do it, all the way, no half measures. Otherwise then let's save the damn thing.
> >
> > Vale,
> >
> > Palladius
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79825 From: Michael K Date: 2010-08-27
Subject: Re: the partitioning of Nova Roma.
Hello,

I've been involved with other organizations which were essentially non profit cultural societies. To shut a society down requires a formal vote from the board of directors as well as all paid memebers who hold cards and then it goes to the corporate registries. If you have money left in the account and especially money that has been given by grants etc, you must show the government that you have distributed the money out to other charities. For large accounts they may do a forensic audit.

In cases unhappy members just resign and leave full of pee and vinegar thinking they can get something better going, More often than not you get a situation like the Reformation go where the new club fighta among its self and splits again then again until you have several clubs all competing with one another then shutting down or going out of business due to stiff competition by doing events at the same time etc.

Anyway this is Alberta. I assume things work similarly in the US as well.

Valete bene,

QSP





--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "deciusiunius" <bcatfd@...> wrote:
>
>
> Welcome back, Ann(i)a,
>
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "lathyrus77" <lathyrus77@> wrote:
> >
> > I agree partition is the only way to solve 99% of the problems. I have some logistics questions:
>
> Well, everyone has different thoughts on this.
>
>
> > How would we legally divide the treasury?
>
> I would want NO ONE to get it. I would only agree if the money went to charity, which IIRC, is one of the requirements in the articles of incorporation anyway. As I recall it was Roman themed educational organizations but I doubt we could agree on one, so it would have to be something like the Red Cross.
>
> > Who holds the trademarks and copyrights? Do we share copyright?
>
> The name Nova Roma and all associated copyrights would be returned to William Bradford and Joeseph Bloch--also a requirement in the articles of incorporation in the case of dissolution. Perhaps there could be a requirement that the name not be use for a certain number of years.
>
> > Would we have liasons between the to sides?
>
> Sure. Most people on both sides would likely still talk to each other.
> >
> > Is there a possibility for the litigious among us to wage legal battle between the two groups?
>
> Naturally, but if the money and copyrights are out of reach, esp. the money, then what would there be to fight about.
>
>
> > I'm assuming each side will have a PM, and preist groups. Will they >confer so as keep the religio whole?
>
> Good question. They should. Would they? <shrug? Who knows?
>
>
> Vale,
>
> Palladius
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79826 From: Belle Morte Statia Date: 2010-08-27
Subject: Re: Corda Serrata Pando: Conventus - RSVP...
Salve et Salvete Omnes:

I agree Julia! We should do something like that, where someone picks a
topic and we answer in prose..


Vale Optime,
Statia Aeternia

On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 9:56 AM, luciaiuliaaquila <
luciaiuliaaquila@...> wrote:

>
>
> Salve Venii!
>
> Gratias tibi! Wouldn't be nice if we all could have discussions expressing
> ourselves through prose!
>
> Vale optime,
>
> Julia
>
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com <Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com>, Publius
> Ullerius Stephanus Venator <famila.ulleria.venii@...> wrote:
> >
> > Salve Aquila;
> >
> > On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 4:36 AM, luciaiuliaaquila wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Corda Serrata Pando
> > >
> > > To know Mater Venus is to know the Roman people,
> > > Alas to know the Roman people, is to know Rome.
> > > Venus' gifted Her children with the ability to know
> > > Her Love intimately, to feel that Love in deep their
> > > Very couer. O' those who open their hearts,
> > > O' they, who truly understand, are thusly aware,
> > > Mater Venus, they know, is very much more:
> > >
> > > [respectful excision]
> >
> > Brava!
> >
> > bene vale - Venator
> >
>
>
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79827 From: QFabiusMaxmi@aol.com Date: 2010-08-27
Subject: Re: de Res Publica
Fabius Maximus


I'm against any partition. So get your facts straight Moravius. You seem to have a problem with that don't you? Getting your facts straight...

Q. Fabius Maximus

Sent from my BlackBerry





-----Original Message-----
From: marcushoratius <MHoratius@...>
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Fri, Aug 27, 2010 4:21 am
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: de Res Publica




Salve Cato

From whence did this idea of "partitioning" the Respublica come? None other than from the Back Ally Boys. The same people who spoke of Civil War, coups, and revolution against the Res Publica - Sulla, Fabius Maximus, Metellus, Valerianus, Gualterus, and Cn. Caesar, with former citizens Octavius, Diana Aventina, and Poplicola. And you were there, too, if only to raise your objection in the Back Alley first.

Octavius Gracchus wrote to those Back Alley Boys:

"Face it - there will be *no* *peace* while Piscinus remains."

Well, maybe the truth is that there can be no peace in Nova Roma as long as these few people from the Back Alley and former citizens are allowed to remain among us.

These are the people who last June discussed conducting a coup to depose our elected officials and the members of the Collegia, and who want to purge the Senate of the majority of its members. Realizing that their coup attempt would never succeed against the majority, they began discussing partition so that they could bring back their version of "Nova Roma Classic." The very version that so many left and that so many of us who remain fought against - including you I am told.

So, if you do not support partition of Nova Roma, if you want peace restored, what is the answer? Side with those who plot against the Res Publica? With those who plot to depose elected officials? With those who attack our Sacerdotes with slurs and insults in a campaign to rid the Collegia of cultores Deorum and depose those adlected into even our most sacred offices? Knowing that they can never win against majority rule, failing in their attempt at a coup, what do they now seek to take from Nova Roma? In the words of former citizen Octavius who laid out this latest Back Alley plot:

"We don't get to the use the NR name, but they don't get to use it either; each group gets half the treasury and as many citizens as are willing to climb aboard."

I see. No one gets to keep the name Nova Roma. If they don't want the name, then why remain here? As many Citizens as they can possibly attract? Election results each year show just how very few Citizens of Nova Roma they attract. So, half of our treasury seems to be their goal. It comes down to them wanting to be paid to depart from Nova Roma.

In my opinion the answer is not so much a partition of Nova Roma as it is a parting of the ways of Res Publica nostra and those BABies from the Back Alley who have disrupted Nova Roma.

Vale

M. Moravius Piscinus

Senator Consularius
Pontifex Maximus
Magister Collegi Augurum

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Cato" <catoinnyc@...> wrote:
>
> C. Equitius Cato senatore quaestore aedilis praetoris omnibus in Foro SPD
>
> Over the past few days there has been much (serious) talk of the idea of dividing the Respublica along political factions; details about who can call themselves what and to whom the aerarium should be dispersed; the invocation of the macronational laws under which we are governed suddenly has become important to many of those who ignored or actively opposed obedience to those laws.
>
> I say enough.
>
> I will not, and cannot, support the destruction of the Respublica simply because those who ridicule the very basic laws and governing acts under which we operate see it as a convenient way out; nor because those who have fought long and hard to uphold the law feel that there can be no justice in this, *our* Respublica.
>
> I am on the vanguard of those who have been despised and abused by those who seek to do us the most harm. I have spoken often, at great - some might say nauseatingly so - length about the need, the fundamental requirement, of those of us who have become citizens to uphold the common law in an effort to grasp in whatever way we can, the idea of being, and living as, Romans in a modern era.
>
> I have been told that I am hated, despised, by those who currently hold power in our government; that I will never be elected to office again because the stranglehold held by those in power is too strong, too entrenched, to ever be broken and their hold over the minds of you, the People, is too strong.
>
> I don't care.
>
> I will continue to fight, to argue, to declaim, to speak freely in opposition to those who would see our Respublica sink into the mire of totalitarianism. I don't care if I never sit in the curule chair again, but I will *not* give up on the vision I have of a functioning, civilized and civilizing beacon of the values that took the vast, dark, ignorant world into a place of order, of law, of community.
>
> Perhaps those who have tried repeatedly over the past few years to emasculate and destroy our Respublica will never have to answer for their crimes. Is this reason enough to rend the garment of the community we have built? Should we not, instead, seek to end their seemingly endless grasping at power and authority, and reclaim what is rightfully the inheritance of the *whole* Respublica - a seamless garment woven by the work and industry and faith of those who seek to build a better place?
>
> I am a citizen of the Respublica. I am a senator of the Respublica. While I have breath in my body, I will *never* bow to the corruption and destruction of our community - even if I am jeered at and made the subject of the most base abuses conceivable. I hereby vow that I shall not rest, I shall not seek solace or comfort, I shall not seek rest or respite, until those who have brought such infamy upon our Respublica shall be brought to *our* justice.
>
> I call upon our citizens, our senators, our magistrates, to reject the idea that tearing apart the Respublica will serve any kind of profitable end. This is *my* home, *my* Respublica. I will defend it to my last breath.
>
> Valete,
>
> Gaius Equitius Cato
>







[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79828 From: lathyrus77 Date: 2010-08-27
Subject: Re: de Res Publica
LOL irony.

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, QFabiusMaxmi@... wrote:
>
>
>
> Fabius Maximus
>
>
> I'm against any partition. So get your facts straight Moravius. You seem to have a problem with that don't you? Getting your facts straight...
>
> Q. Fabius Maximus
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79829 From: Marcia Regina Date: 2010-08-27
Subject: Re: the partitioning of Nova Roma.
--- Em sex, 27/8/10, Michael K <mjk@...> escreveu:

De: Michael K <mjk@...>
Assunto: [Nova-Roma] Re: the partitioning of Nova Roma.
Para: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Data: Sexta-feira, 27 de Agosto de 2010, 14:01

Please explain me more about this part.
Thanks!



In cases unhappy members just resign and leave full of pee and vinegar thinking they can get something better going, More often than not you get a situation like the Reformation go where the new club fighta among its self and splits again then again until you have several clubs all competing with one another then shutting down or going out of business due to stiff competition by doing events at the same time etc.



Anyway this is Alberta. I assume things work similarly in the US as well.



Valete bene,



QSP



--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "deciusiunius" <bcatfd@...> wrote:

>

>

> Welcome back, Ann(i)a,

>

>

> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "lathyrus77" <lathyrus77@> wrote:

> >

> > I agree partition is the only way to solve 99% of the problems. I have some logistics questions:

>

> Well, everyone has different thoughts on this.

>

>

> > How would we legally divide the treasury?

>

> I would want NO ONE to get it. I would only agree if the money went to charity, which IIRC, is one of the requirements in the articles of incorporation anyway. As I recall it was Roman themed educational organizations but I doubt we could agree on one, so it would have to be something like the Red Cross.

>

> > Who holds the trademarks and copyrights? Do we share copyright?

>

> The name Nova Roma and all associated copyrights would be returned to William Bradford and Joeseph Bloch--also a requirement in the articles of incorporation in the case of dissolution. Perhaps there could be a requirement that the name not be use for a certain number of years.

>

> > Would we have liasons between the to sides?

>

> Sure. Most people on both sides would likely still talk to each other.

> >

> > Is there a possibility for the litigious among us to wage legal battle between the two groups?

>

> Naturally, but if the money and copyrights are out of reach, esp. the money, then what would there be to fight about.

>

>

> > I'm assuming each side will have a PM, and preist groups. Will they >confer so as keep the religio whole?

>

> Good question. They should. Would they? <shrug? Who knows?

>

>

> Vale,

>

> Palladius

>






























[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79830 From: M. Octavius Gracchus Date: 2010-08-27
Subject: Re: de Res Publica
Piscinus wrote:

> Octavius Gracchus wrote to those Back Alley Boys:
>
> "Face it - there will be *no* *peace* while Piscinus remains."

No, I wrote that *here*, to Maior, in full view of everyone. Get your facts
straight.

The idea of partitioning was mine alone, and was presented here with input from
no one else; it took the "Back Alley Boys" by surprise as much as anyone, and
there's been as much debate there as here. Really, if this was a BA *plot*,
don't you think Cato would have *gotten* the *memo* and be on-board?

While partitioning Nova Roma is a new idea, I had previously advocated smaller
groups. In April of 2009, I wrote a series of private messages to some of the
founders titled "To Build a City", laying out a plan for a legal and software
framework that would support multiple Roman groups, letting each "do their own
thing" but with common tools and community resources (mailing lists etc.).

The ideas put forth in those private messages over a year ago, was that what we
need is something like a big city. I live in Chicago, the third largest city in
this country; but I bank at a small local bank that exists nowhere else, shop at
small neighbourhood grocery stores that aren't part of a chain, work for small
companies with at most a dozen employees each, and have a handful of close
friends - the vast majority of the people around me are strangers. I don't
bother them, they don't bother me.

Living in a huge and diverse city provides me and my fellow citizens to select
from a myriad of *small* entities to interact with - yet with the resources that
only a major city can provide, like public transport, restaurants of every
ethnicity, easy access to any shop I can imagine, thousands of people (many of
them potential friends, many more of them people I will *never* know) within reach.

Nova Roma is, at present, a small town. In a small town one cannot easily
ignore the local bullies or drunks - you see them every day. If the head of the
one church in town is some rabid, foaming-at-the-mouth fanatic, what do you do?
Put up with it, or don't go, or leave the town. In a big city you just drive
the extra four blocks to the next church of the same denomination - there'll be
several to pick from.

My idea then was to build a software platform for hosting various Roman groups,
allowing for common things like registration, sodalitas membership, finding
citizens in your area; but with political structures isolated into
non-interacting silos. Persons would join the various political entities - NR,
SVR, whatever - at will, but their status there wouldn't affect their name,
their membership in their local groups or sodalitates, or their member profiles
on the site (except to add or take away various logos from the profile pages
indicating membership, ranks or titles in these groups).

Nova Roman and Societas Via Romana shared a web server for about three years.
While the web sites didn't share any code, they shared a process; the same
program (Apache+mod_php) could serve a NR hit, a SVR hit, and then a NR hit, all
within the same second, all using the same bytes of memory. I'd have liked to
take this sharing of resources a few levels further up toward the surface.

Ultimately, the plan went nowhere, because I presented it as a software project,
and it was one I simply didn't have time to build.

But the idea of small groups remained, and recent events have brought it to mind
again:

- the resignation of Nova Roma's CFO, meaning your finances will soon be a
horrific mess again.
- the resignation of Nova Roma's CIO, leaving the plan to modernise the web site
in *serious* jeopardy.
- the shabby treatment of consul Albucius, which all but guarantees that he'll
oppose anything you try to alleviate the above.
- the failed dictatorship (and the purge that would have come about if successful).
- statements from some of your adversaries in private that, if they are removed
from the Senate by dictator or censor or other means, they *will* sue Nova Roma
and its censors personally in real-world court.
- the growing consensus that NR, as it stands today, will *never* accomplish
anything.
- Maior's suggestion for corporate dissolution, two days ago.

We've been in this boxing ring for years. You've managed to land quite a few
serious blows on NR Classic, and we're bloody and bruised, yet defiant as ever.
We're not going away - even the non-citizens among the Nova Roma old-timers
still care enough to participate in the struggle now and then. And we're
gaining strength - your recent bullying actions, against an Pontifex, against a
Lictor, against a Consul - have earned you some *new* enemies, people who
weren't here in the Classic years.

And your side has suffered some serious blows as well. The CFO resigned. The
Chief Vestal resigned. The CIO resigned. Not only did they leave their posts,
they renounced citizenship. Their knowledge and their work effort is lost to
you. You, Piscinus, are no longer respected by your peers in the Collegium
Pontificum, as evidenced by your failed attempts to oust Metellus and Valerianus
(the report of which was excised from the voting results you posted). It's two
and a half months before election time, and Nova Roma will only be able to put
on a legal election if you go *begging*, hat in hand, to another ex-citizen - T.
Octavius Pius - and ask him to run it for you, after he already said the
previous election was the last one he'd do.

We're all bloody and bruised, and the conflict shows no sign of drawing to any
natural conclusion.

Let's call it a draw.

Split it down the middle.

You say this is about money; personally, I care very little about that. It is
your side using the name and flag of Nova Roma, the name that Vedius and Cassius
and Palladius made, the flag under which I served for ten years, that is so
offensive.

That's why we won't just go form some other group and call it "Roman Thing 2".
"Nova Roma" is a name that, while battered and tarnished, is *ours*, and has
meaning to us. To see you as the King of Nova Roma turns my stomach.

Give up the name of Nova Roma and use some variant; allow our side to use some
other variant, with a mutual, legally binding agreement to *share* the
trademark; give us half of the money that was accumulated over twelve years
(most of it *before* your takeover); make the novaroma.org web site a simple
placeholder page that offers two options.

A *small* *price* to pay for making all of your adversaries simply *go* *away*,
willingly and cheerfully.

We can coexist. Let Nova Roma be restructured as a major City, that houses
independent entities, independent churches, independent corporations - all
within easy reach of the inhabitants.

If the "Back Alley Boys" are so *awful* as you claim, our group will *wither*
and *die* within a few years, and yours - unimpeded by us, for we'll be
prohibited from joining - will *grow* and *prosper*. If you're so clever and
good and capable, you'll soon have triple the membership you have now (none of
those nasty BAB's to frighten away the innocent!), and you'll double the
treasury again in no time at all.

Or you can continue on the present course, a path of failure, constant
frustration, and haemorrhaging of your officers, and you can blame all your
failure to accomplish anything worthwhile on those nasty founders who just won't
go away.

We're offering you a way out of the death spiral.

We're offering you a way to *prove* that your vision for NR is best: set up two
entities, and see if one thrives and the other fails.

One senate vote, one comitia vote, a change of name, some legal paperwork, and
everyone who vexes you will *disappear*. No purge, no threats, no lawsuits, no
vengeful ghosts.

Vale, Octavius.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79831 From: petronius_dexter Date: 2010-08-27
Subject: Re: de Re Publica
C. Petronius C. Catoni s.p.d.,

> I say enough.

I do too. Nova Roma is one and undivisible.

Optime vale.

C. Petronius Dexter
Arcoiali scribebat
a. d. VI Kalendas Septembres P. Memmio K. Fabio II coss.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79832 From: luciaiuliaaquila Date: 2010-08-27
Subject: Re: Corda Serrata Pando: Conventus - RSVP...
Ave Petroni!

Obviously I am not a poet;) One day when I have time I will work again with meter and sonnets, sestinas and even heroic couplets etc. for I want to try them once again- some day. I briefly mentioned this to you along with my love of the poetry of the French Trouveres (in archaic French no less!). But this takes practice and practice takes time, and right now, esp. now I don't have much time. It is on my list of things to do. I am, and have been, taking steps to return to a state of living that I so adore, to live in mostly inspirational solitude with easels strewn about and pieces of sculpture in different stages of completion, with my prosaic stories here and there waiting for the next sentence - and to once more take up the task of writing structured poetry rather than the free style prose I now, on occasion, create.

This prosaic declaration of what Venus has been to Romans throughout the ages, of what She means, symbolizes, to me, was an inspiration of sorts; free form prosaic thoughts that tumbled from my heart. Not poetry, for I am an awful poet - and I hold others to the same tough standards - even if they get the meter right :) Of course I adore your fine work and only hope some day I can create poetry of such quality.

This offering of prose was a prayer upon arising, in less than fifteen minutes or so the words flowed as if sleep was meditation - even before my morning purifications and rituals, my morning meditations - before I uttered word, before I wet my lips.
Would it be less truth if written in elegiac couplets, dactylic hexameter or hendecasyllabic? No, of course not but *laugh* the response time to Venator's prose would certainly be quite delayed and would certainly lose its relevance:)
This, no matter what one choses to call it, is the expression of truths as I see it.

As for course, stick with me kiddo and you may just be surprised what you learn! Placidus and I had a similar conversation regarding Italian song. I shared with him that I was having difficulty singing "Quando, Quando, Quando" in Italian (which I wanted to sing for an Italian language group) because suddenly I had more syllables than music! He kindly told me that song was one of the most difficult for even Italian singers. I also experience this same difficulty you speak of as an English speaker when reading French poetry. This is evident in the many translations of Baudelaire and I d find I like the English translations by his contemporaries much better for their lack of modern references and adherence and attention to form.

And so, I hope somewhere in this long post I have answered your question.

Now back to work - I need the many arms of a Hindu God to juggle all the business, commissions and projects I have to attend to this day.
Tonight I will escape from this avalanche of work and enjoy Shakespeare in the Park!

Bonsior mon cher ami,

Vale,

Julia




--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "petronius_dexter" <jfarnoud94@...> wrote:
>
> C. Petronius L. Juliae s.p.d.,
>
> > To know Mater Venus is to know the Roman people,
> > Alas to know the Roman people, is to know Rome.
> > Venus' gifted Her children with the ability to know
> > Her Love intimately, to feel that Love in deep their
> > Very couer. O' those who open their hearts,
> > O' they, who truly understand, are thusly aware,
> > Mater Venus, they know, is very much more:
>
> I would like understand how English poems work. It is so different with French poetry that I need some courses. Apparently you are free with number of syllabs, free with rhyme... is a poetry like ancient Roman with metres?
>
> Optime vale.
>
> C. Petronius Dexter
> Arcoiali scribebat
> a. d. VI Kalendas Septembres P. Memmio K. Fabio II coss.
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79833 From: Gnaeus Iulius Caesar Date: 2010-08-27
Subject: Re: de Res Publica
Caesar Piscino sal.

A samll correction, much like Fabius had to point out to you, I don't favour partition.

If it happens well obviously I will deal with it then, but it doesn't make a lot of sense from many differing perspectives, all for different reasons, and because of the liklihood that history will repeat itself, not just in one group but in all those that break away. It would only be a question of time, and the issues (which may differ) and the faces.

So no, I am not in favour. I don't mind being described as a Back Alley Boy :) but you were obviously misinformed again and jumped to conclusions. again, by assuming I was in favour or that it had come from me. Now of course if that wasn't what you were implying, well your post was confusing in that regard.

Much like everything connected with Nova Roma, everything even there on the BA is not black and white. There are numerous people there who seem totally opposed to the idea, others who support it, and others who haven't voiced an opinion yet, much like here on the Main List.

Optime vale


--- On Fri, 8/27/10, marcushoratius <MHoratius@...> wrote:

> From: marcushoratius <MHoratius@...>
> Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: de Res Publica
> To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> Date: Friday, August 27, 2010, 5:21 AM
> Salve Cato
>
> From whence did this idea of "partitioning" the Respublica
> come?  None other than from the Back Ally Boys. 
> The same people who spoke of Civil War, coups, and
> revolution against the Res Publica - Sulla, Fabius Maximus,
> Metellus, Valerianus, Gualterus, and Cn. Caesar, with former
> citizens Octavius, Diana Aventina, and Poplicola. And you
> were there, too, if only to raise your objection in the Back
> Alley first.
>
> Octavius Gracchus wrote to those Back Alley Boys:
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79834 From: lathyrus77 Date: 2010-08-27
Subject: Re: de Res Publica
Cut the drama Matt. You people aren't the "victims" that are "bloodied and battered". You're bullies, all of you. Unfortunately for you, your opposition is just as stubborn and they fight back.


To end the fighting, NR should split.

Give the treasury to a living history reenactment group.


-Anna Bucci

AKA Annia Minucia Marcella

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "M. Octavius Gracchus" <octaviusgracchus@...> wrote:
>
>
> Piscinus wrote:
>
> > Octavius Gracchus wrote to those Back Alley Boys:
> >
> > "Face it - there will be *no* *peace* while Piscinus remains."
>
> No, I wrote that *here*, to Maior, in full view of everyone. Get your facts
> straight.
>
> The idea of partitioning was mine alone, and was presented here with input from
> no one else; it took the "Back Alley Boys" by surprise as much as anyone, and
> there's been as much debate there as here. Really, if this was a BA *plot*,
> don't you think Cato would have *gotten* the *memo* and be on-board?
>
> While partitioning Nova Roma is a new idea, I had previously advocated smaller
> groups. In April of 2009, I wrote a series of private messages to some of the
> founders titled "To Build a City", laying out a plan for a legal and software
> framework that would support multiple Roman groups, letting each "do their own
> thing" but with common tools and community resources (mailing lists etc.).
>
> The ideas put forth in those private messages over a year ago, was that what we
> need is something like a big city. I live in Chicago, the third largest city in
> this country; but I bank at a small local bank that exists nowhere else, shop at
> small neighbourhood grocery stores that aren't part of a chain, work for small
> companies with at most a dozen employees each, and have a handful of close
> friends - the vast majority of the people around me are strangers. I don't
> bother them, they don't bother me.
>
> Living in a huge and diverse city provides me and my fellow citizens to select
> from a myriad of *small* entities to interact with - yet with the resources that
> only a major city can provide, like public transport, restaurants of every
> ethnicity, easy access to any shop I can imagine, thousands of people (many of
> them potential friends, many more of them people I will *never* know) within reach.
>
> Nova Roma is, at present, a small town. In a small town one cannot easily
> ignore the local bullies or drunks - you see them every day. If the head of the
> one church in town is some rabid, foaming-at-the-mouth fanatic, what do you do?
> Put up with it, or don't go, or leave the town. In a big city you just drive
> the extra four blocks to the next church of the same denomination - there'll be
> several to pick from.
>
> My idea then was to build a software platform for hosting various Roman groups,
> allowing for common things like registration, sodalitas membership, finding
> citizens in your area; but with political structures isolated into
> non-interacting silos. Persons would join the various political entities - NR,
> SVR, whatever - at will, but their status there wouldn't affect their name,
> their membership in their local groups or sodalitates, or their member profiles
> on the site (except to add or take away various logos from the profile pages
> indicating membership, ranks or titles in these groups).
>
> Nova Roman and Societas Via Romana shared a web server for about three years.
> While the web sites didn't share any code, they shared a process; the same
> program (Apache+mod_php) could serve a NR hit, a SVR hit, and then a NR hit, all
> within the same second, all using the same bytes of memory. I'd have liked to
> take this sharing of resources a few levels further up toward the surface.
>
> Ultimately, the plan went nowhere, because I presented it as a software project,
> and it was one I simply didn't have time to build.
>
> But the idea of small groups remained, and recent events have brought it to mind
> again:
>
> - the resignation of Nova Roma's CFO, meaning your finances will soon be a
> horrific mess again.
> - the resignation of Nova Roma's CIO, leaving the plan to modernise the web site
> in *serious* jeopardy.
> - the shabby treatment of consul Albucius, which all but guarantees that he'll
> oppose anything you try to alleviate the above.
> - the failed dictatorship (and the purge that would have come about if successful).
> - statements from some of your adversaries in private that, if they are removed
> from the Senate by dictator or censor or other means, they *will* sue Nova Roma
> and its censors personally in real-world court.
> - the growing consensus that NR, as it stands today, will *never* accomplish
> anything.
> - Maior's suggestion for corporate dissolution, two days ago.
>
> We've been in this boxing ring for years. You've managed to land quite a few
> serious blows on NR Classic, and we're bloody and bruised, yet defiant as ever.
> We're not going away - even the non-citizens among the Nova Roma old-timers
> still care enough to participate in the struggle now and then. And we're
> gaining strength - your recent bullying actions, against an Pontifex, against a
> Lictor, against a Consul - have earned you some *new* enemies, people who
> weren't here in the Classic years.
>
> And your side has suffered some serious blows as well. The CFO resigned. The
> Chief Vestal resigned. The CIO resigned. Not only did they leave their posts,
> they renounced citizenship. Their knowledge and their work effort is lost to
> you. You, Piscinus, are no longer respected by your peers in the Collegium
> Pontificum, as evidenced by your failed attempts to oust Metellus and Valerianus
> (the report of which was excised from the voting results you posted). It's two
> and a half months before election time, and Nova Roma will only be able to put
> on a legal election if you go *begging*, hat in hand, to another ex-citizen - T.
> Octavius Pius - and ask him to run it for you, after he already said the
> previous election was the last one he'd do.
>
> We're all bloody and bruised, and the conflict shows no sign of drawing to any
> natural conclusion.
>
> Let's call it a draw.
>
> Split it down the middle.
>
> You say this is about money; personally, I care very little about that. It is
> your side using the name and flag of Nova Roma, the name that Vedius and Cassius
> and Palladius made, the flag under which I served for ten years, that is so
> offensive.
>
> That's why we won't just go form some other group and call it "Roman Thing 2".
> "Nova Roma" is a name that, while battered and tarnished, is *ours*, and has
> meaning to us. To see you as the King of Nova Roma turns my stomach.
>
> Give up the name of Nova Roma and use some variant; allow our side to use some
> other variant, with a mutual, legally binding agreement to *share* the
> trademark; give us half of the money that was accumulated over twelve years
> (most of it *before* your takeover); make the novaroma.org web site a simple
> placeholder page that offers two options.
>
> A *small* *price* to pay for making all of your adversaries simply *go* *away*,
> willingly and cheerfully.
>
> We can coexist. Let Nova Roma be restructured as a major City, that houses
> independent entities, independent churches, independent corporations - all
> within easy reach of the inhabitants.
>
> If the "Back Alley Boys" are so *awful* as you claim, our group will *wither*
> and *die* within a few years, and yours - unimpeded by us, for we'll be
> prohibited from joining - will *grow* and *prosper*. If you're so clever and
> good and capable, you'll soon have triple the membership you have now (none of
> those nasty BAB's to frighten away the innocent!), and you'll double the
> treasury again in no time at all.
>
> Or you can continue on the present course, a path of failure, constant
> frustration, and haemorrhaging of your officers, and you can blame all your
> failure to accomplish anything worthwhile on those nasty founders who just won't
> go away.
>
> We're offering you a way out of the death spiral.
>
> We're offering you a way to *prove* that your vision for NR is best: set up two
> entities, and see if one thrives and the other fails.
>
> One senate vote, one comitia vote, a change of name, some legal paperwork, and
> everyone who vexes you will *disappear*. No purge, no threats, no lawsuits, no
> vengeful ghosts.
>
> Vale, Octavius.
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79835 From: luciaiuliaaquila Date: 2010-08-27
Subject: Re: Corda Serrata Pando: Conventus - RSVP...
Ave Statia Aeternia!

Good idea, it could serve to make some think before they venture forward a thought - hopefully:)

But consider what Du Bellay penned about poets and prose writers in Les Regrets CXLIX:

"Vous dictes (Courtisans) les Poetes sont fouls,
Et dictes verite: mais aussi dire j'ose,
Que telz que vous spuez, vous tenez quelque chose
De ceste doulce humeur qui est commune a tous

Mais celle=la (Messieurs) qui domine sur vous,
En sutres actions diversement s'expose:
Nous sommes fouls en rime, & vous l'estes en prose:
C'est le seul different qu'est entre vous & nous."

"Poets are mad: so, Courtiers, you declare;
And right you are; but I daresay that you
Have not a little of that madness too,
That softness of the head that all men share.

If you and us, however, we compare,
Different the forms of madness we pursue:
Ours is in rhyme, and yours, in prose; though true,
No other difference 'twixt the two is there."

Madness can be s sign of the divine within:)


Vale,

Julia

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Belle Morte Statia <syrenslullaby@...> wrote:
>
> Salve et Salvete Omnes:
>
> I agree Julia! We should do something like that, where someone picks a
> topic and we answer in prose..
>
>
> Vale Optime,
> Statia Aeternia
>
> On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 9:56 AM, luciaiuliaaquila <
> luciaiuliaaquila@...> wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > Salve Venii!
> >
> > Gratias tibi! Wouldn't be nice if we all could have discussions expressing
> > ourselves through prose!
> >
> > Vale optime,
> >
> > Julia
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79836 From: Publius Ullerius Stephanus Venator Date: 2010-08-27
Subject: Re: Corda Serrata Pando: Conventus - RSVP...
Salve Lucia Iulia;

On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 1:13 PM, Lucia Iulia Aquila wrote:
>
> [excision]
>
> "Poets are mad: so, Courtiers, you declare;
> And right you are; but I daresay that you
> Have not a little of that madness too,
> That softness of the head that all men share.
>
> If you and us, however, we compare,
> Different the forms of madness we pursue:
> Ours is in rhyme, and yours, in prose; though true,
> No other difference 'twixt the two is there."
>
> Madness can be s sign of the divine within:)
>
> Vale,
>
> Julia
>

This is so appropriate, I seem much more productive in poetry and
prose writing during the periods when I do not take medication for the
clinical depression with which I have been dealing for many years...

A little bit of poetic back and forth would be wonderful!

One can say so much in fewer words than straight prose.

Also, trying to answer in poetry gives one pause and cause to think.

Something else the Res Publica could use.

bene vale - Venator
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79837 From: qvalerius Date: 2010-08-27
Subject: Re: de Res Publica
"> From whence did this idea of "partitioning" the Respublica come? None other than from the Back Ally Boys. The same people who spoke of Civil War, coups, and revolution against the Res Publica - Sulla, Fabius Maximus, Metellus, Valerianus, Gualterus, and Cn. Caesar, with former citizens Octavius, Diana Aventina, and Poplicola. And you were there, too, if only to raise your objection in the Back Alley first."

Civil War? Coups? Revolution? You must have a terrible memory. These were things you were trying to get me involved in when I first came to Nova Roma, back when we both were in SVR (right after your bullying reforms ended up killing that place - good job, btw).

The people who wanted a coup d'etat were you, Maior, Modianus, and Quintilianus. Many others, like Dexter and Albucius, realized you for what you were and decided to fight your hostile faction. But it's so hilarious to see your revisionism of events, and your of course foggy memory.

For the record, I have not been now nor have I ever been in favor of this partition, Senator McCarthy. I would however love to see another group fill in the gap left by this group - a functioning religious community without a self-styled Pope tainting it with pollution, causing a curse to be brought on the whole organization. I'd love to see this pollution excised from Nova Roma, and then I could feel comfortable about returning.

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "marcushoratius" <MHoratius@...> wrote:
>
> Salve Cato
>
> From whence did this idea of "partitioning" the Respublica come? None other than from the Back Ally Boys. The same people who spoke of Civil War, coups, and revolution against the Res Publica - Sulla, Fabius Maximus, Metellus, Valerianus, Gualterus, and Cn. Caesar, with former citizens Octavius, Diana Aventina, and Poplicola. And you were there, too, if only to raise your objection in the Back Alley first.
>
> Octavius Gracchus wrote to those Back Alley Boys:
>
> "Face it - there will be *no* *peace* while Piscinus remains."
>
> Well, maybe the truth is that there can be no peace in Nova Roma as long as these few people from the Back Alley and former citizens are allowed to remain among us.
>
> These are the people who last June discussed conducting a coup to depose our elected officials and the members of the Collegia, and who want to purge the Senate of the majority of its members. Realizing that their coup attempt would never succeed against the majority, they began discussing partition so that they could bring back their version of "Nova Roma Classic." The very version that so many left and that so many of us who remain fought against - including you I am told.
>
> So, if you do not support partition of Nova Roma, if you want peace restored, what is the answer? Side with those who plot against the Res Publica? With those who plot to depose elected officials? With those who attack our Sacerdotes with slurs and insults in a campaign to rid the Collegia of cultores Deorum and depose those adlected into even our most sacred offices? Knowing that they can never win against majority rule, failing in their attempt at a coup, what do they now seek to take from Nova Roma? In the words of former citizen Octavius who laid out this latest Back Alley plot:
>
> "We don't get to the use the NR name, but they don't get to use it either; each group gets half the treasury and as many citizens as are willing to climb aboard."
>
> I see. No one gets to keep the name Nova Roma. If they don't want the name, then why remain here? As many Citizens as they can possibly attract? Election results each year show just how very few Citizens of Nova Roma they attract. So, half of our treasury seems to be their goal. It comes down to them wanting to be paid to depart from Nova Roma.
>
> In my opinion the answer is not so much a partition of Nova Roma as it is a parting of the ways of Res Publica nostra and those BABies from the Back Alley who have disrupted Nova Roma.
>
> Vale
>
> M. Moravius Piscinus
>
> Senator Consularius
> Pontifex Maximus
> Magister Collegi Augurum
>
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Cato" <catoinnyc@> wrote:
> >
> > C. Equitius Cato senatore quaestore aedilis praetoris omnibus in Foro SPD
> >
> > Over the past few days there has been much (serious) talk of the idea of dividing the Respublica along political factions; details about who can call themselves what and to whom the aerarium should be dispersed; the invocation of the macronational laws under which we are governed suddenly has become important to many of those who ignored or actively opposed obedience to those laws.
> >
> > I say enough.
> >
> > I will not, and cannot, support the destruction of the Respublica simply because those who ridicule the very basic laws and governing acts under which we operate see it as a convenient way out; nor because those who have fought long and hard to uphold the law feel that there can be no justice in this, *our* Respublica.
> >
> > I am on the vanguard of those who have been despised and abused by those who seek to do us the most harm. I have spoken often, at great - some might say nauseatingly so - length about the need, the fundamental requirement, of those of us who have become citizens to uphold the common law in an effort to grasp in whatever way we can, the idea of being, and living as, Romans in a modern era.
> >
> > I have been told that I am hated, despised, by those who currently hold power in our government; that I will never be elected to office again because the stranglehold held by those in power is too strong, too entrenched, to ever be broken and their hold over the minds of you, the People, is too strong.
> >
> > I don't care.
> >
> > I will continue to fight, to argue, to declaim, to speak freely in opposition to those who would see our Respublica sink into the mire of totalitarianism. I don't care if I never sit in the curule chair again, but I will *not* give up on the vision I have of a functioning, civilized and civilizing beacon of the values that took the vast, dark, ignorant world into a place of order, of law, of community.
> >
> > Perhaps those who have tried repeatedly over the past few years to emasculate and destroy our Respublica will never have to answer for their crimes. Is this reason enough to rend the garment of the community we have built? Should we not, instead, seek to end their seemingly endless grasping at power and authority, and reclaim what is rightfully the inheritance of the *whole* Respublica - a seamless garment woven by the work and industry and faith of those who seek to build a better place?
> >
> > I am a citizen of the Respublica. I am a senator of the Respublica. While I have breath in my body, I will *never* bow to the corruption and destruction of our community - even if I am jeered at and made the subject of the most base abuses conceivable. I hereby vow that I shall not rest, I shall not seek solace or comfort, I shall not seek rest or respite, until those who have brought such infamy upon our Respublica shall be brought to *our* justice.
> >
> > I call upon our citizens, our senators, our magistrates, to reject the idea that tearing apart the Respublica will serve any kind of profitable end. This is *my* home, *my* Respublica. I will defend it to my last breath.
> >
> > Valete,
> >
> > Gaius Equitius Cato
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79838 From: qvalerius Date: 2010-08-27
Subject: Re: Corda Serrata Pando: Conventus - RSVP...
Salve, Venator amice. The same goes for manic-depression too. I've noticed the finest stuff coming from the depressed phase, although others attest to the power of the mania as well.

Vale!

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Publius Ullerius Stephanus Venator <famila.ulleria.venii@...> wrote:
>
> Salve Lucia Iulia;
>
> On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 1:13 PM, Lucia Iulia Aquila wrote:
> >
> > [excision]
> >
> > "Poets are mad: so, Courtiers, you declare;
> > And right you are; but I daresay that you
> > Have not a little of that madness too,
> > That softness of the head that all men share.
> >
> > If you and us, however, we compare,
> > Different the forms of madness we pursue:
> > Ours is in rhyme, and yours, in prose; though true,
> > No other difference 'twixt the two is there."
> >
> > Madness can be s sign of the divine within:)
> >
> > Vale,
> >
> > Julia
> >
>
> This is so appropriate, I seem much more productive in poetry and
> prose writing during the periods when I do not take medication for the
> clinical depression with which I have been dealing for many years...
>
> A little bit of poetic back and forth would be wonderful!
>
> One can say so much in fewer words than straight prose.
>
> Also, trying to answer in poetry gives one pause and cause to think.
>
> Something else the Res Publica could use.
>
> bene vale - Venator
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79839 From: M. Octavius Gracchus Date: 2010-08-27
Subject: Re: de Re Publica
On 08/27/2010 12:47 PM, petronius_dexter wrote:
> C. Petronius C. Catoni s.p.d.,
>
>> I say enough.
>
> I do too. Nova Roma is one and undivisible.

"God Himself cannot sink this ship."

O.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79840 From: qvalerius Date: 2010-08-27
Subject: Re: de Re Publica
Poplicola Dextro sal.

NR hasn't been indivisible in quite some time. It's been divided up into factions, personalities, and feuding parties. I'm not coming out in favor of this split, but let's not kid ourselves.

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "petronius_dexter" <jfarnoud94@...> wrote:
>
> C. Petronius C. Catoni s.p.d.,
>
> > I say enough.
>
> I do too. Nova Roma is one and undivisible.
>
> Optime vale.
>
> C. Petronius Dexter
> Arcoiali scribebat
> a. d. VI Kalendas Septembres P. Memmio K. Fabio II coss.
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79841 From: Michael K Date: 2010-08-27
Subject: Re: the partitioning of Nova Roma (Marcia Regina).
Hello Marcia,

Sure! I have seen numerous cases but I'll use our Mexican Cultural Society of Edmonton as an example. We have been building it for 13 years and many people come and go. Nevertheless there is a small core number of 1/2 a dozen of us who keep it going come thick or thin all these years Sometimes other people come and have all sorts of great ideas and criticisms. If their new ideas are questioned or not understanding what a non profit organization is (they can't make money for their own pockets), they split amd leave on the lamest of excuses. Some of these people who have gone and formed their own societies and trumpet out how good the new society will be, grab our lists and contact all the community. Sadly the initially get a lot of promises about help and support but alas when its time to get volunteers for their major events like fiestas and cultural events their friends and members disappear coming up with a litany of excuses for not following through. Much of the work is left in just a few hands and this is overwhelming. This of course creates pressure and discontent among the group, a few in turn think they can do better, split apart and form a new club who finds out that things are not as easy and rosy to get going as usual and they split again... much like cell division in Biology 101.

I might add that there are always many members but they do not like volunteering time; just going to the parties and events. Anway in time you get several different societies in the same city competing with one another in different fund raising events so we all end up suffering with smaller turn outs and hence income.

That said, Old Quintus here has become impervious to divisions of societies and is never shocked, shaken or surprised!

Cheers,

QSP






--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Marcia Regina <marcia_alves2004@...> wrote:
>
>
>
> --- Em sex, 27/8/10, Michael K <mjk@...> escreveu:
>
> De: Michael K <mjk@...>
> Assunto: [Nova-Roma] Re: the partitioning of Nova Roma.
> Para: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> Data: Sexta-feira, 27 de Agosto de 2010, 14:01
>
> Please explain me more about this part.
> Thanks!
>
>
>
> In cases unhappy members just resign and leave full of pee and vinegar thinking they can get something better going, More often than not you get a situation like the Reformation go where the new club fighta among its self and splits again then again until you have several clubs all competing with one another then shutting down or going out of business due to stiff competition by doing events at the same time etc.
>
>
>
> Anyway this is Alberta. I assume things work similarly in the US as well.
>
>
>
> Valete bene,
>
>
>
> QSP
>
>
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "deciusiunius" <bcatfd@> wrote:
>
> >
>
> >
>
> > Welcome back, Ann(i)a,
>
> >
>
> >
>
> > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "lathyrus77" <lathyrus77@> wrote:
>
> > >
>
> > > I agree partition is the only way to solve 99% of the problems. I have some logistics questions:
>
> >
>
> > Well, everyone has different thoughts on this.
>
> >
>
> >
>
> > > How would we legally divide the treasury?
>
> >
>
> > I would want NO ONE to get it. I would only agree if the money went to charity, which IIRC, is one of the requirements in the articles of incorporation anyway. As I recall it was Roman themed educational organizations but I doubt we could agree on one, so it would have to be something like the Red Cross.
>
> >
>
> > > Who holds the trademarks and copyrights? Do we share copyright?
>
> >
>
> > The name Nova Roma and all associated copyrights would be returned to William Bradford and Joeseph Bloch--also a requirement in the articles of incorporation in the case of dissolution. Perhaps there could be a requirement that the name not be use for a certain number of years.
>
> >
>
> > > Would we have liasons between the to sides?
>
> >
>
> > Sure. Most people on both sides would likely still talk to each other.
>
> > >
>
> > > Is there a possibility for the litigious among us to wage legal battle between the two groups?
>
> >
>
> > Naturally, but if the money and copyrights are out of reach, esp. the money, then what would there be to fight about.
>
> >
>
> >
>
> > > I'm assuming each side will have a PM, and preist groups. Will they >confer so as keep the religio whole?
>
> >
>
> > Good question. They should. Would they? <shrug? Who knows?
>
> >
>
> >
>
> > Vale,
>
> >
>
> > Palladius
>
> >
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79842 From: lathyrus77 Date: 2010-08-27
Subject: Re: the partitioning of Nova Roma (Marcia Regina).
How do you account for the successful split of the Asatru Free Assembly into 3 very large and foundationally strong organizations?


-Anna Bucci

AKA Annia Minucia Marcella

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Michael K" <mjk@...> wrote:
>
> Hello Marcia,
>
> Sure! I have seen numerous cases but I'll use our Mexican Cultural Society of Edmonton as an example. We have been building it for 13 years and many people come and go. Nevertheless there is a small core number of 1/2 a dozen of us who keep it going come thick or thin all these years Sometimes other people come and have all sorts of great ideas and criticisms. If their new ideas are questioned or not understanding what a non profit organization is (they can't make money for their own pockets), they split amd leave on the lamest of excuses. Some of these people who have gone and formed their own societies and trumpet out how good the new society will be, grab our lists and contact all the community. Sadly the initially get a lot of promises about help and support but alas when its time to get volunteers for their major events like fiestas and cultural events their friends and members disappear coming up with a litany of excuses for not following through. Much of the work is left in just a few hands and this is overwhelming. This of course creates pressure and discontent among the group, a few in turn think they can do better, split apart and form a new club who finds out that things are not as easy and rosy to get going as usual and they split again... much like cell division in Biology 101.
>
> I might add that there are always many members but they do not like volunteering time; just going to the parties and events. Anway in time you get several different societies in the same city competing with one another in different fund raising events so we all end up suffering with smaller turn outs and hence income.
>
> That said, Old Quintus here has become impervious to divisions of societies and is never shocked, shaken or surprised!
>
> Cheers,
>
> QSP
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Marcia Regina <marcia_alves2004@> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > --- Em sex, 27/8/10, Michael K <mjk@> escreveu:
> >
> > De: Michael K <mjk@>
> > Assunto: [Nova-Roma] Re: the partitioning of Nova Roma.
> > Para: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> > Data: Sexta-feira, 27 de Agosto de 2010, 14:01
> >
> > Please explain me more about this part.
> > Thanks!
> >
> >
> >
> > In cases unhappy members just resign and leave full of pee and vinegar thinking they can get something better going, More often than not you get a situation like the Reformation go where the new club fighta among its self and splits again then again until you have several clubs all competing with one another then shutting down or going out of business due to stiff competition by doing events at the same time etc.
> >
> >
> >
> > Anyway this is Alberta. I assume things work similarly in the US as well.
> >
> >
> >
> > Valete bene,
> >
> >
> >
> > QSP
> >
> >
> >
> > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "deciusiunius" <bcatfd@> wrote:
> >
> > >
> >
> > >
> >
> > > Welcome back, Ann(i)a,
> >
> > >
> >
> > >
> >
> > > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "lathyrus77" <lathyrus77@> wrote:
> >
> > > >
> >
> > > > I agree partition is the only way to solve 99% of the problems. I have some logistics questions:
> >
> > >
> >
> > > Well, everyone has different thoughts on this.
> >
> > >
> >
> > >
> >
> > > > How would we legally divide the treasury?
> >
> > >
> >
> > > I would want NO ONE to get it. I would only agree if the money went to charity, which IIRC, is one of the requirements in the articles of incorporation anyway. As I recall it was Roman themed educational organizations but I doubt we could agree on one, so it would have to be something like the Red Cross.
> >
> > >
> >
> > > > Who holds the trademarks and copyrights? Do we share copyright?
> >
> > >
> >
> > > The name Nova Roma and all associated copyrights would be returned to William Bradford and Joeseph Bloch--also a requirement in the articles of incorporation in the case of dissolution. Perhaps there could be a requirement that the name not be use for a certain number of years.
> >
> > >
> >
> > > > Would we have liasons between the to sides?
> >
> > >
> >
> > > Sure. Most people on both sides would likely still talk to each other.
> >
> > > >
> >
> > > > Is there a possibility for the litigious among us to wage legal battle between the two groups?
> >
> > >
> >
> > > Naturally, but if the money and copyrights are out of reach, esp. the money, then what would there be to fight about.
> >
> > >
> >
> > >
> >
> > > > I'm assuming each side will have a PM, and preist groups. Will they >confer so as keep the religio whole?
> >
> > >
> >
> > > Good question. They should. Would they? <shrug? Who knows?
> >
> > >
> >
> > >
> >
> > > Vale,
> >
> > >
> >
> > > Palladius
> >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79843 From: Publius Memmius Albucius Date: 2010-08-27
Subject: On a possible partition of NR - a consular statement
Salvete Quirites,



I read with interests the contributions on a possible "partition" of Nova Roma, brought by citizens as non-citizens, as our former Censor Matt Hucke.



The welcome brought to such debate, in both political sides, showed that this question was not lived as a partisan one.



But, even if I may refresh a few desires of discussing this point forward ;-), I feel necessary to inform every citizen that this matter is not opportune for two reasons: first because the more serious a crisis, the greater effort we must do to face it, even we may be sometimes discouraged towards complex situations ; second, just because, under my consulate, I will never allow that Nova Roma be split: as Rome, NR will stay one.





Valete omnes Quirites,







P. Memmius Albucius

consul


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79844 From: Belle Morte Statia Date: 2010-08-27
Subject: Re: de Res Publica
Salve,

Now Annia... Not everyone are bullies, you know that..

The Partition is not neccessary in my peasley piffle of an opinion.

To end the fighting, bickering, and squabbling, people just need to act like
adults not children.

It's that simple.

vale,
Aeternia

On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 11:10 AM, lathyrus77 <lathyrus77@...> wrote:

>
>
> Cut the drama Matt. You people aren't the "victims" that are "bloodied and
> battered". You're bullies, all of you. Unfortunately for you, your
> opposition is just as stubborn and they fight back.
>
> To end the fighting, NR should split.
>
> Give the treasury to a living history reenactment group.
>
>
> -Anna Bucci
>
> AKA Annia Minucia Marcella
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com <Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com>, "M.
> Octavius Gracchus" <octaviusgracchus@...> wrote:
> >
> >
> > Piscinus wrote:
> >
> > > Octavius Gracchus wrote to those Back Alley Boys:
> > >
> > > "Face it - there will be *no* *peace* while Piscinus remains."
> >
> > No, I wrote that *here*, to Maior, in full view of everyone. Get your
> facts
> > straight.
> >
> > The idea of partitioning was mine alone, and was presented here with
> input from
> > no one else; it took the "Back Alley Boys" by surprise as much as anyone,
> and
> > there's been as much debate there as here. Really, if this was a BA
> *plot*,
> > don't you think Cato would have *gotten* the *memo* and be on-board?
> >
> > While partitioning Nova Roma is a new idea, I had previously advocated
> smaller
> > groups. In April of 2009, I wrote a series of private messages to some of
> the
> > founders titled "To Build a City", laying out a plan for a legal and
> software
> > framework that would support multiple Roman groups, letting each "do
> their own
> > thing" but with common tools and community resources (mailing lists
> etc.).
> >
> > The ideas put forth in those private messages over a year ago, was that
> what we
> > need is something like a big city. I live in Chicago, the third largest
> city in
> > this country; but I bank at a small local bank that exists nowhere else,
> shop at
> > small neighbourhood grocery stores that aren't part of a chain, work for
> small
> > companies with at most a dozen employees each, and have a handful of
> close
> > friends - the vast majority of the people around me are strangers. I
> don't
> > bother them, they don't bother me.
> >
> > Living in a huge and diverse city provides me and my fellow citizens to
> select
> > from a myriad of *small* entities to interact with - yet with the
> resources that
> > only a major city can provide, like public transport, restaurants of
> every
> > ethnicity, easy access to any shop I can imagine, thousands of people
> (many of
> > them potential friends, many more of them people I will *never* know)
> within reach.
> >
> > Nova Roma is, at present, a small town. In a small town one cannot easily
>
> > ignore the local bullies or drunks - you see them every day. If the head
> of the
> > one church in town is some rabid, foaming-at-the-mouth fanatic, what do
> you do?
> > Put up with it, or don't go, or leave the town. In a big city you just
> drive
> > the extra four blocks to the next church of the same denomination -
> there'll be
> > several to pick from.
> >
> > My idea then was to build a software platform for hosting various Roman
> groups,
> > allowing for common things like registration, sodalitas membership,
> finding
> > citizens in your area; but with political structures isolated into
> > non-interacting silos. Persons would join the various political entities
> - NR,
> > SVR, whatever - at will, but their status there wouldn't affect their
> name,
> > their membership in their local groups or sodalitates, or their member
> profiles
> > on the site (except to add or take away various logos from the profile
> pages
> > indicating membership, ranks or titles in these groups).
> >
> > Nova Roman and Societas Via Romana shared a web server for about three
> years.
> > While the web sites didn't share any code, they shared a process; the
> same
> > program (Apache+mod_php) could serve a NR hit, a SVR hit, and then a NR
> hit, all
> > within the same second, all using the same bytes of memory. I'd have
> liked to
> > take this sharing of resources a few levels further up toward the
> surface.
> >
> > Ultimately, the plan went nowhere, because I presented it as a software
> project,
> > and it was one I simply didn't have time to build.
> >
> > But the idea of small groups remained, and recent events have brought it
> to mind
> > again:
> >
> > - the resignation of Nova Roma's CFO, meaning your finances will soon be
> a
> > horrific mess again.
> > - the resignation of Nova Roma's CIO, leaving the plan to modernise the
> web site
> > in *serious* jeopardy.
> > - the shabby treatment of consul Albucius, which all but guarantees that
> he'll
> > oppose anything you try to alleviate the above.
> > - the failed dictatorship (and the purge that would have come about if
> successful).
> > - statements from some of your adversaries in private that, if they are
> removed
> > from the Senate by dictator or censor or other means, they *will* sue
> Nova Roma
> > and its censors personally in real-world court.
> > - the growing consensus that NR, as it stands today, will *never*
> accomplish
> > anything.
> > - Maior's suggestion for corporate dissolution, two days ago.
> >
> > We've been in this boxing ring for years. You've managed to land quite a
> few
> > serious blows on NR Classic, and we're bloody and bruised, yet defiant as
> ever.
> > We're not going away - even the non-citizens among the Nova Roma
> old-timers
> > still care enough to participate in the struggle now and then. And we're
> > gaining strength - your recent bullying actions, against an Pontifex,
> against a
> > Lictor, against a Consul - have earned you some *new* enemies, people who
>
> > weren't here in the Classic years.
> >
> > And your side has suffered some serious blows as well. The CFO resigned.
> The
> > Chief Vestal resigned. The CIO resigned. Not only did they leave their
> posts,
> > they renounced citizenship. Their knowledge and their work effort is lost
> to
> > you. You, Piscinus, are no longer respected by your peers in the
> Collegium
> > Pontificum, as evidenced by your failed attempts to oust Metellus and
> Valerianus
> > (the report of which was excised from the voting results you posted).
> It's two
> > and a half months before election time, and Nova Roma will only be able
> to put
> > on a legal election if you go *begging*, hat in hand, to another
> ex-citizen - T.
> > Octavius Pius - and ask him to run it for you, after he already said the
> > previous election was the last one he'd do.
> >
> > We're all bloody and bruised, and the conflict shows no sign of drawing
> to any
> > natural conclusion.
> >
> > Let's call it a draw.
> >
> > Split it down the middle.
> >
> > You say this is about money; personally, I care very little about that.
> It is
> > your side using the name and flag of Nova Roma, the name that Vedius and
> Cassius
> > and Palladius made, the flag under which I served for ten years, that is
> so
> > offensive.
> >
> > That's why we won't just go form some other group and call it "Roman
> Thing 2".
> > "Nova Roma" is a name that, while battered and tarnished, is *ours*, and
> has
> > meaning to us. To see you as the King of Nova Roma turns my stomach.
> >
> > Give up the name of Nova Roma and use some variant; allow our side to use
> some
> > other variant, with a mutual, legally binding agreement to *share* the
> > trademark; give us half of the money that was accumulated over twelve
> years
> > (most of it *before* your takeover); make the novaroma.org web site a
> simple
> > placeholder page that offers two options.
> >
> > A *small* *price* to pay for making all of your adversaries simply *go*
> *away*,
> > willingly and cheerfully.
> >
> > We can coexist. Let Nova Roma be restructured as a major City, that
> houses
> > independent entities, independent churches, independent corporations -
> all
> > within easy reach of the inhabitants.
> >
> > If the "Back Alley Boys" are so *awful* as you claim, our group will
> *wither*
> > and *die* within a few years, and yours - unimpeded by us, for we'll be
> > prohibited from joining - will *grow* and *prosper*. If you're so clever
> and
> > good and capable, you'll soon have triple the membership you have now
> (none of
> > those nasty BAB's to frighten away the innocent!), and you'll double the
> > treasury again in no time at all.
> >
> > Or you can continue on the present course, a path of failure, constant
> > frustration, and haemorrhaging of your officers, and you can blame all
> your
> > failure to accomplish anything worthwhile on those nasty founders who
> just won't
> > go away.
> >
> > We're offering you a way out of the death spiral.
> >
> > We're offering you a way to *prove* that your vision for NR is best: set
> up two
> > entities, and see if one thrives and the other fails.
> >
> > One senate vote, one comitia vote, a change of name, some legal
> paperwork, and
> > everyone who vexes you will *disappear*. No purge, no threats, no
> lawsuits, no
> > vengeful ghosts.
> >
> > Vale, Octavius.
> >
>
>
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79845 From: lathyrus77 Date: 2010-08-27
Subject: Re: de Res Publica
--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Belle Morte Statia <syrenslullaby@...> wrote:
>
> Salve,
>
> Now Annia... Not everyone are bullies, you know that..


All the ones I was referring to are bullies.


>
> The Partition is not neccessary in my peasley piffle of an opinion.
>


K.


> To end the fighting, bickering, and squabbling, people just need to act like
> adults not children.
>


Incorrect. Children don't threaten lawsuits for one. Please do not denigrate children by saying what occurs here as childish. I've met a lot of children in my life, only adults act like this.


To end the fighting, people need to be separated. People can keep resigning, or the org can dissolve, or it can split.



> It's that simple.
>


Being simplistic isn't always the best way to go.



-Anna Bucci

AKA Annia Minucia Marcella
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79846 From: Belle Morte Statia Date: 2010-08-27
Subject: Re: de Res Publica
Salve,

see comments below.

On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 2:09 PM, lathyrus77 <lathyrus77@...> wrote:

>
>
>
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com <Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com>, Belle
> Morte Statia <syrenslullaby@...> wrote:
> >
> > Salve,
> >
> > Now Annia... Not everyone are bullies, you know that..
>
> All the ones I was referring to are bullies.
>

Aeternia: Lets just say we agree to disagree on this one.

>
>
> >
> > The Partition is not neccessary in my peasley piffle of an opinion.
> >
>
> K.
>
> > To end the fighting, bickering, and squabbling, people just need to act
> like
> > adults not children.
> >
>
> Incorrect. Children don't threaten lawsuits for one. Please do not
> denigrate children by saying what occurs here as childish. I've met a lot of
> children in my life, only adults act like this.
>

Aeternia: I was a former Au Pair, I have seen my share of what spoiled
children can act like. So again we agree to disagree..

>
> To end the fighting, people need to be separated. People can keep
> resigning, or the org can dissolve, or it can split.
>
> Aeternia: So you're saying it's better to run away, than handling the
situation like mature adults?


> > It's that simple.
> >
>
> Being simplistic isn't always the best way to go.
>

Aeternia: Once upon a time NR was simple, going back to the basics to have
a second look not always a bad thing.



>
>
> -Anna Bucci
>
> AKA Annia Minucia Marcella
>
>
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79847 From: C.Maria Caeca Date: 2010-08-27
Subject: Re: de Res Publica
C. Maria Caeca omnibus in foro S. P. D.

that "load of verbiage" from Cato was one of the finest orations I have eve read ...and I totally and absolutely support his stance in this. I will be posting my own load of verbiage, soon ...which you may also ignore, but I will be on record ...and I have a lot to say.

I have found it unwise to ignore what people have to say, and that especially includes what people with whom I disagree, have to say, for 2 reasons. I cannot address the statements or understand the thinking of people who I ignore ...and I am sometimes surprised to find that, in fact, I may not disagree, or not entirely.

Respectfully,
Valete,
C. Maria Caeca

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79848 From: lathyrus77 Date: 2010-08-27
Subject: Re: de Res Publica
--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Belle Morte Statia <syrenslullaby@...> wrote:
>
> Salve,
>
> see comments below.
>
> On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 2:09 PM, lathyrus77 <lathyrus77@...> wrote:
>
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com <Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com>, Belle
> > Morte Statia <syrenslullaby@> wrote:
> > >
> > > Salve,
> > >
> > > Now Annia... Not everyone are bullies, you know that..
> >
> > All the ones I was referring to are bullies.
> >
>
> Aeternia: Lets just say we agree to disagree on this one.
>


K.


> >
> >
> > >
> > > The Partition is not neccessary in my peasley piffle of an opinion.
> > >
> >
> > K.
> >
> > > To end the fighting, bickering, and squabbling, people just need to act
> > like
> > > adults not children.
> > >
> >
> > Incorrect. Children don't threaten lawsuits for one. Please do not
> > denigrate children by saying what occurs here as childish. I've met a lot of
> > children in my life, only adults act like this.
> >
>
> Aeternia: I was a former Au Pair, I have seen my share of what spoiled
> children can act like. So again we agree to disagree..
>


I doubt your experience had children getting lawyers to sue other children for not letting them run the clubhouse. I doubt your experience had children that would recite legislation and bicker over interpretation and semantics at length. And i seriously doubt you had children that would even want to particpate in the drama fest here. children don't act like politicians. Only adults do this. I believe if the adults here acted more like children, there'd be a lot less boring trivial discussions and a lot more fun. People here are far too uptight to be like children.


> >
> > To end the fighting, people need to be separated. People can keep
> > resigning, or the org can dissolve, or it can split.
> >
> > Aeternia: So you're saying it's better to run away, than handling the
> situation like mature adults?
>
>
> > > It's that simple.
> > >
> >
> > Being simplistic isn't always the best way to go.
> >
>
> Aeternia: Once upon a time NR was simple, going back to the basics to have
> a second look not always a bad thing.
>


One of the benefits of partitioning NR is that the new organizations can start over.


-Anna Bucci

AKA Annia Minucia Marcella
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79849 From: Belle Morte Statia Date: 2010-08-27
Subject: Re: de Res Publica
On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 2:36 PM, lathyrus77 <lathyrus77@...> wrote:

>
>
>
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com <Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com>, Belle
> Morte Statia <syrenslullaby@...> wrote:
> >
> > Salve,
> >
> > see comments below.
> >
> > On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 2:09 PM, lathyrus77 <lathyrus77@...> wrote:
> >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com <Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com><Nova-Roma%
> 40yahoogroups.com>, Belle
>
> > > Morte Statia <syrenslullaby@> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Salve,
> > > >
> > > > Now Annia... Not everyone are bullies, you know that..
> > >
> > > All the ones I was referring to are bullies.
> > >
> >
> > Aeternia: Lets just say we agree to disagree on this one.
> >
>
> K.
>
> > >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > The Partition is not neccessary in my peasley piffle of an opinion.
> > > >
> > >
> > > K.
> > >
> > > > To end the fighting, bickering, and squabbling, people just need to
> act
> > > like
> > > > adults not children.
> > > >
> > >
> > > Incorrect. Children don't threaten lawsuits for one. Please do not
> > > denigrate children by saying what occurs here as childish. I've met a
> lot of
> > > children in my life, only adults act like this.
> > >
> >
> > Aeternia: I was a former Au Pair, I have seen my share of what spoiled
> > children can act like. So again we agree to disagree..
> >
>
> I doubt your experience had children getting lawyers to sue other children
> for not letting them run the clubhouse. I doubt your experience had children
> that would recite legislation and bicker over interpretation and semantics
> at length. And i seriously doubt you had children that would even want to
> particpate in the drama fest here. children don't act like politicians. Only
> adults do this. I believe if the adults here acted more like children,
> there'd be a lot less boring trivial discussions and a lot more fun. People
> here are far too uptight to be like children.
>

Aeternia: You missed the some of the recent moments that have occurred
trust me, you'd have a change of heart. Children don't understand the
concept of politics, its something that is learned later on,
but children can be mean and cruel and petty, just like children can be
sweet and wonderful. I will agree with you, some folks are too uptight here
they do need to learn how to have fun.



>
>
> > >
> > > To end the fighting, people need to be separated. People can keep
> > > resigning, or the org can dissolve, or it can split.
> > >
> > > Aeternia: So you're saying it's better to run away, than handling the
> > situation like mature adults?
> >
> >
> > > > It's that simple.
> > > >
> > >
> > > Being simplistic isn't always the best way to go.
> > >
> >
> > Aeternia: Once upon a time NR was simple, going back to the basics to
> have
> > a second look not always a bad thing.
> >
>
> One of the benefits of partitioning NR is that the new organizations can
> start over.
>
>
Aeternia: I'm confused why you're advocating for this when you have resigned
Annia? Whats your purpose in all of this?



>
> -Anna Bucci
>
> AKA Annia Minucia Marcella
>
>
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79850 From: lathyrus77 Date: 2010-08-27
Subject: Re: de Res Publica
--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Belle Morte Statia <syrenslullaby@...> wrote:

>
> Aeternia: You missed the some of the recent moments that have occurred
> trust me, you'd have a change of heart. Children don't understand the
> concept of politics, its something that is learned later on,
> but children can be mean and cruel and petty, just like children can be
> sweet and wonderful. I will agree with you, some folks are too uptight here
> they do need to learn how to have fun.
>


Being mean, cruel, and petty transcends age. Part of the many traits that humans have as a species.


maybe if we all got together and smoked a bunch of weed, people would mellow out more.


-Anna Bucci
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79851 From: Gaius Lucretius Seneca Date: 2010-08-27
Subject: Re: de Res Publica
On 8/27/2010 3:36 PM, lathyrus77 wrote:
> I doubt your experience had children getting lawyers to sue other
> children for not letting them run the clubhouse. I doubt your
> experience had children that would recite legislation and bicker over
> interpretation and semantics at length. And i seriously doubt you had
> children that would even want to particpate in the drama fest here.
> children don't act like politicians. Only adults do this. I believe if
> the adults here acted more like children, there'd be a lot less boring
> trivial discussions and a lot more fun. People here are far too
> uptight to be like children.

I'm afraid I don't understand this line of reasoning at all. Are you
suggesting that only children can behave childishly? What does the
phrase "like a child" mean if you can only apply it to a child?

In a less mature phase of my life, I have indeed behaved childishly, and
in an office environment. But by this logic, I could not have done so
because I was not a child and children do not work in offices.

Vale,
Seneca
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79852 From: M. Octavius Gracchus Date: 2010-08-27
Subject: Re: On a possible partition of NR - a consular statement
Honoured Consul Albucius,

I understand that you oppose the idea of a partition.

But this is one of the most important questions to face Nova Roma in some time.

Persons on all sides of the political divide are frustrated with the inaction,
the lack of any real accomplishments, the constant bullying, the threats of
legal action, the refusal of magistrates or priests to do their jobs.

This is an issue that transcends the usual factionalism. People who never agree
with each other on *anything* are united in supporting it; likewise, long-term
adversaries are uniting against it.

The idea was presented only *two* *days* *ago*.

Two days is not long enough for a debate of this importance, just like it was
not long enough to consider a dictatorship last month.

Please, do not state your opposition in such *final* terms.

You do not favour the idea at present; that's fine, I respect that.

But let the debate continue longer than two days; participate, explain your
reasoning, let the proponents of the plan address your concerns.

Perhaps you'll change your mind. Perhaps not. But don't strangle the proposal
before it's had a fair hearing.

Vale, M. Octavius Gracchus,
Consular.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79854 From: rory12001 Date: 2010-08-27
Subject: Re: On a possible partition of NR - a consular statement
Salvete;

Obviously Albucius forgot that the Roman state was called Res Populi Romani; the business of the Roman People!

We can certainly have the tribunes call the Senate and have the Senate vote on a resolution and then put it to the people to vote on.

One co-president can't stop that. Under Maine Non Profit Law. So just disregard the rest.

Everyone can read the legal facts for her or hiself here
http://www.mainelegislature.org/legis/statutes/13-b/title13-Bsec1101.html
optime valete
M. Hortensia Maior

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "M. Octavius Gracchus" <octaviusgracchus@...> wrote:
>
> Honoured Consul Albucius,
>
> I understand that you oppose the idea of a partition.
>
> But this is one of the most important questions to face Nova Roma in some time.
>
> Persons on all sides of the political divide are frustrated with the inaction,
> the lack of any real accomplishments, the constant bullying, the threats of
> legal action, the refusal of magistrates or priests to do their jobs.
>
> This is an issue that transcends the usual factionalism. People who never agree
> with each other on *anything* are united in supporting it; likewise, long-term
> adversaries are uniting against it.
>
> The idea was presented only *two* *days* *ago*.
>
> Two days is not long enough for a debate of this importance, just like it was
> not long enough to consider a dictatorship last month.
>
> Please, do not state your opposition in such *final* terms.
>
> You do not favour the idea at present; that's fine, I respect that.
>
> But let the debate continue longer than two days; participate, explain your
> reasoning, let the proponents of the plan address your concerns.
>
> Perhaps you'll change your mind. Perhaps not. But don't strangle the proposal
> before it's had a fair hearing.
>
> Vale, M. Octavius Gracchus,
> Consular.
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79855 From: lathyrus77 Date: 2010-08-27
Subject: Re: de Res Publica
I would consider childish to be something the is behaviour that is present moreso in children than other age groups. Acting adversarial, petty, mean, etc is more prone to adults than children, in my experience.

Childish behaviour(of the negative sort) would be more like tantrums of screaming, stompng of feet, throwing objects, etc. Children tend to be more physically expressive, adults tend to be more verbally expressive. And these outburst tend to last for short periods, such as 15 minutes. Adults tend to carry grudges and prolong verbal fights for days, even weeks.


I'll give you an example:

My sister and I would get into fights when we were children. These would be yelling and physical altercations. My mom would have to physically separate us. As adults we still fight, but instead of hitting and yelling at each other we post nasty comments on each other's facebook pages. Eventually we both took each other off our social networks, i.e. we separated ourselves.


After having been a member of a plethora of adult online groups, message boards, mailing lists, etc the behaviour on this group is normal for adults. I don't see how it would be characterized as childish.


-Anna Bucci

AKA Annia Minucia Marcella



--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Gaius Lucretius Seneca <c.lucretius.seneca@...> wrote:
>
> On 8/27/2010 3:36 PM, lathyrus77 wrote:
> > I doubt your experience had children getting lawyers to sue other
> > children for not letting them run the clubhouse. I doubt your
> > experience had children that would recite legislation and bicker over
> > interpretation and semantics at length. And i seriously doubt you had
> > children that would even want to particpate in the drama fest here.
> > children don't act like politicians. Only adults do this. I believe if
> > the adults here acted more like children, there'd be a lot less boring
> > trivial discussions and a lot more fun. People here are far too
> > uptight to be like children.
>
> I'm afraid I don't understand this line of reasoning at all. Are you
> suggesting that only children can behave childishly? What does the
> phrase "like a child" mean if you can only apply it to a child?
>
> In a less mature phase of my life, I have indeed behaved childishly, and
> in an office environment. But by this logic, I could not have done so
> because I was not a child and children do not work in offices.
>
> Vale,
> Seneca
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79856 From: C.Maria Caeca Date: 2010-08-27
Subject: Re: On a possible partition of NR - a consular statement
C. Maria Caeca P. Memio Albucio Consuli S. P. D.

Gratias plurimas tibi, Consul.

(bad Latin, I suspect, but heartfelt.)

Most Respectfully,
C. Maria Caeca

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79857 From: Belle Morte Statia Date: 2010-08-27
Subject: Re: Corda Serrata Pando: Conventus - RSVP...
Salve Julia,


Touche! So who gets to start first? ;-)


Vale,
Aeternia

On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 11:13 AM, luciaiuliaaquila <
luciaiuliaaquila@...> wrote:

>
>
> Ave Statia Aeternia!
>
> Good idea, it could serve to make some think before they venture forward a
> thought - hopefully:)
>
> But consider what Du Bellay penned about poets and prose writers in Les
> Regrets CXLIX:
>
> "Vous dictes (Courtisans) les Poetes sont fouls,
> Et dictes verite: mais aussi dire j'ose,
> Que telz que vous spuez, vous tenez quelque chose
> De ceste doulce humeur qui est commune a tous
>
> Mais celle=la (Messieurs) qui domine sur vous,
> En sutres actions diversement s'expose:
> Nous sommes fouls en rime, & vous l'estes en prose:
> C'est le seul different qu'est entre vous & nous."
>
> "Poets are mad: so, Courtiers, you declare;
> And right you are; but I daresay that you
> Have not a little of that madness too,
> That softness of the head that all men share.
>
> If you and us, however, we compare,
> Different the forms of madness we pursue:
> Ours is in rhyme, and yours, in prose; though true,
> No other difference 'twixt the two is there."
>
> Madness can be s sign of the divine within:)
>
> Vale,
>
> Julia
>
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com <Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com>, Belle
> Morte Statia <syrenslullaby@...> wrote:
> >
> > Salve et Salvete Omnes:
> >
> > I agree Julia! We should do something like that, where someone picks a
> > topic and we answer in prose..
> >
> >
> > Vale Optime,
> > Statia Aeternia
> >
> > On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 9:56 AM, luciaiuliaaquila <
> > luciaiuliaaquila@...> wrote:
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > Salve Venii!
> > >
> > > Gratias tibi! Wouldn't be nice if we all could have discussions
> expressing
> > > ourselves through prose!
> > >
> > > Vale optime,
> > >
> > > Julia
>
>
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79858 From: Terry Wilson Date: 2010-08-27
Subject: Re: de Res Publica
Eureka!  We've stumbled upon yet one more irreparable fault line along which
Nova Roma can divide -- one's definition of "childish behavior."  Ye gods!!

Terry Wilson
 




________________________________
From: lathyrus77 <lathyrus77@...>
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Fri, August 27, 2010 6:08:38 PM
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: de Res Publica

 
I would consider childish to be something the is behaviour that is present
moreso in children than other age groups. Acting adversarial, petty, mean, etc
is more prone to adults than children, in my experience.

Childish behaviour(of the negative sort) would be more like tantrums of
screaming, stompng of feet, throwing objects, etc. Children tend to be more
physically expressive, adults tend to be more verbally expressive. And these
outburst tend to last for short periods, such as 15 minutes. Adults tend to
carry grudges and prolong verbal fights for days, even weeks.

I'll give you an example:

My sister and I would get into fights when we were children. These would be
yelling and physical altercations. My mom would have to physically separate us.
As adults we still fight, but instead of hitting and yelling at each other we
post nasty comments on each other's facebook pages. Eventually we both took each
other off our social networks, i.e. we separated ourselves.

After having been a member of a plethora of adult online groups, message boards,
mailing lists, etc the behaviour on this group is normal for adults. I don't see
how it would be characterized as childish.

-Anna Bucci

AKA Annia Minucia Marcella

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Gaius Lucretius Seneca
<c.lucretius.seneca@...> wrote:
>
> On 8/27/2010 3:36 PM, lathyrus77 wrote:
> > I doubt your experience had children getting lawyers to sue other
> > children for not letting them run the clubhouse. I doubt your
> > experience had children that would recite legislation and bicker over
> > interpretation and semantics at length. And i seriously doubt you had
> > children that would even want to particpate in the drama fest here.
> > children don't act like politicians. Only adults do this. I believe if
> > the adults here acted more like children, there'd be a lot less boring
> > trivial discussions and a lot more fun. People here are far too
> > uptight to be like children.
>
> I'm afraid I don't understand this line of reasoning at all. Are you
> suggesting that only children can behave childishly? What does the
> phrase "like a child" mean if you can only apply it to a child?
>
> In a less mature phase of my life, I have indeed behaved childishly, and
> in an office environment. But by this logic, I could not have done so
> because I was not a child and children do not work in offices.
>
> Vale,
> Seneca
>







[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79859 From: M. Octavius Gracchus Date: 2010-08-27
Subject: Re: On a possible partition of NR - a consular statement
Salve Maior,

> We can certainly have the tribunes call the Senate and have the Senate vote on a resolution and then put it to the people to vote on.

I would suggest that we work with the Consul, rather than around him.
Disregarding a consul was one of the major causes of last month's nastiness.

So, let the debate continue. It is far too early to consider exactly how or
when it will be brought to a vote.

Vale, Octavius.

(I say "we" because I fully intend to return as a citizen of one of the two Nova
Romas, if a partition does take place. My present non-citizen status is a
protest, and once the entities I am protesting are isolated, my status will change).
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79860 From: lathyrus77 Date: 2010-08-27
Subject: Re: de Res Publica
--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Terry Wilson <twilson6356@...> wrote:
>
> Eureka!  We've stumbled upon yet one more irreparable fault line along which
> Nova Roma can divide -- one's definition of "childish behavior."  Ye gods!!
>



Except semantic arguuments are hardly new in this place. It is an old and weary fault line.



-Anna Bucci

AKA Annia Minucia Marcella
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79861 From: Gaius Tullius Valerianus Date: 2010-08-27
Subject: Re: de Res Publica
> From whence did this idea of "partitioning" the Respublica come? None other
> than from the Back Ally Boys. The same people who spoke of Civil War, coups,
> and revolution against the Res Publica - Sulla, Fabius Maximus, Metellus,
> Valerianus, Gualterus, and Cn. Caesar, with former citizens Octavius, Diana
> Aventina, and Poplicola. And you were there, too, if only to raise your
> objection in the Back Alley first.
>
> Piscinus is, of course, in error (which is becoming all to common a
phenomenon - I'm truly disappointed in you, Piscine!). I, at least, have
only spoken out *against* the partition idea, not for it. So have several
others on the Back Alley, though I decline to speak publicly of what
specific others said on a private list. But since Piscinus constantly boasts
that he has spies, informants, and sycophants everywhere, he should know
that already.

~ Gaius Tullius Valerianus, who is *still* against the idea, but shall
definitely be joining "Nova Roma Classic" if the partition comes to pass
despite his objections.




>
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79862 From: lathyrus77 Date: 2010-08-27
Subject: Re: On a possible partition of NR - a consular statement
I agree, and the same for my non-citizen status. I will most likely rejoin one of the new nova roma orgs(if this occurs), since the very reason I left is still among you threatening lawsuits.


-Anna Bucci

AKA Annia Minucia Marcella

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "M. Octavius Gracchus" <octaviusgracchus@...> wrote:
>
> Salve Maior,
>
> > We can certainly have the tribunes call the Senate and have the Senate vote on a resolution and then put it to the people to vote on.
>
> I would suggest that we work with the Consul, rather than around him.
> Disregarding a consul was one of the major causes of last month's nastiness.
>
> So, let the debate continue. It is far too early to consider exactly how or
> when it will be brought to a vote.
>
> Vale, Octavius.
>
> (I say "we" because I fully intend to return as a citizen of one of the two Nova
> Romas, if a partition does take place. My present non-citizen status is a
> protest, and once the entities I am protesting are isolated, my status will change).
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79863 From: Cato Date: 2010-08-27
Subject: Re: de Res Publica
Cato Lucretio Senecae sal.

Damn those child labor laws! :)

vale,

Cato


--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Gaius Lucretius Seneca <c.lucretius.seneca@...> wrote:

> In a less mature phase of my life, I have indeed behaved childishly, and
> in an office environment. But by this logic, I could not have done so
> because I was not a child and children do not work in offices.
>
> Vale,
> Seneca
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79864 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2010-08-27
Subject: Re: On a possible partition of NR - a consular statement
Maior,

Again, the tribunes cannot summon the senate for matters outside of the
Tribunes constitutionally specified realm. Try again.

Vale,

Sulla

On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 4:08 PM, rory12001 <rory12001@...> wrote:

>
>
> Salvete;
>
> Obviously Albucius forgot that the Roman state was called Res Populi
> Romani; the business of the Roman People!
>
> We can certainly have the tribunes call the Senate and have the Senate vote
> on a resolution and then put it to the people to vote on.
>
> One co-president can't stop that. Under Maine Non Profit Law. So just
> disregard the rest.
>
> Everyone can read the legal facts for her or hiself here
> http://www.mainelegislature.org/legis/statutes/13-b/title13-Bsec1101.html
> optime valete
> M. Hortensia Maior
>
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com <Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com>, "M.
> Octavius Gracchus" <octaviusgracchus@...> wrote:
> >
> > Honoured Consul Albucius,
> >
> > I understand that you oppose the idea of a partition.
> >
> > But this is one of the most important questions to face Nova Roma in some
> time.
> >
> > Persons on all sides of the political divide are frustrated with the
> inaction,
> > the lack of any real accomplishments, the constant bullying, the threats
> of
> > legal action, the refusal of magistrates or priests to do their jobs.
> >
> > This is an issue that transcends the usual factionalism. People who never
> agree
> > with each other on *anything* are united in supporting it; likewise,
> long-term
> > adversaries are uniting against it.
> >
> > The idea was presented only *two* *days* *ago*.
> >
> > Two days is not long enough for a debate of this importance, just like it
> was
> > not long enough to consider a dictatorship last month.
> >
> > Please, do not state your opposition in such *final* terms.
> >
> > You do not favour the idea at present; that's fine, I respect that.
> >
> > But let the debate continue longer than two days; participate, explain
> your
> > reasoning, let the proponents of the plan address your concerns.
> >
> > Perhaps you'll change your mind. Perhaps not. But don't strangle the
> proposal
> > before it's had a fair hearing.
> >
> > Vale, M. Octavius Gracchus,
> > Consular.
> >
>
>
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79865 From: rory12001 Date: 2010-08-27
Subject: Re: On a possible partition of NR - a consular statement
Maior Quiritibus spd

you can't stop an officer from calling a Board meeting to conduct the Non-profit's business. The tribunes are officers, so is the co-president Kaeso Fabius Buteo Quinitllianus. It's not an issue at all.

vale
Maior
>
> Maior,
>
> Again, the tribunes cannot summon the senate for matters outside of the
> Tribunes constitutionally specified realm. Try again.
>
> Vale,
>
> Sulla
>
> On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 4:08 PM, rory12001 <rory12001@...> wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > Salvete;
> >
> > Obviously Albucius forgot that the Roman state was called Res Populi
> > Romani; the business of the Roman People!
> >
> > We can certainly have the tribunes call the Senate and have the Senate vote
> > on a resolution and then put it to the people to vote on.
> >
> > One co-president can't stop that. Under Maine Non Profit Law. So just
> > disregard the rest.
> >
> > Everyone can read the legal facts for her or hiself here
> > http://www.mainelegislature.org/legis/statutes/13-b/title13-Bsec1101.html
> > optime valete
> > M. Hortensia Maior
> >
> >
> > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com <Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com>, "M.
> > Octavius Gracchus" <octaviusgracchus@> wrote:
> > >
> > > Honoured Consul Albucius,
> > >
> > > I understand that you oppose the idea of a partition.
> > >
> > > But this is one of the most important questions to face Nova Roma in some
> > time.
> > >
> > > Persons on all sides of the political divide are frustrated with the
> > inaction,
> > > the lack of any real accomplishments, the constant bullying, the threats
> > of
> > > legal action, the refusal of magistrates or priests to do their jobs.
> > >
> > > This is an issue that transcends the usual factionalism. People who never
> > agree
> > > with each other on *anything* are united in supporting it; likewise,
> > long-term
> > > adversaries are uniting against it.
> > >
> > > The idea was presented only *two* *days* *ago*.
> > >
> > > Two days is not long enough for a debate of this importance, just like it
> > was
> > > not long enough to consider a dictatorship last month.
> > >
> > > Please, do not state your opposition in such *final* terms.
> > >
> > > You do not favour the idea at present; that's fine, I respect that.
> > >
> > > But let the debate continue longer than two days; participate, explain
> > your
> > > reasoning, let the proponents of the plan address your concerns.
> > >
> > > Perhaps you'll change your mind. Perhaps not. But don't strangle the
> > proposal
> > > before it's had a fair hearing.
> > >
> > > Vale, M. Octavius Gracchus,
> > > Consular.
> > >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79866 From: rory12001 Date: 2010-08-27
Subject: Re: On a possible partition of NR - a consular statement
M. Hortensia M. Octavio spd;
bene,. Gracchus and I understand that we're happy to part company. I don't hate his group let's call it NR Classic, for convenience, I just don't want to have anything to do with them...

I know he feels the same way. It's not Highlander where only ONE can win. As Anna Minucia said, Asatru groups have split and prospered.

Better to be 2 prospering groups than what we have now...
I want an end to the dysfunctional fighting. We both have better things to do with our time.
vale
Maior

> >
> > Salve Maior,
> >
> > > We can certainly have the tribunes call the Senate and have the Senate vote on a resolution and then put it to the people to vote on.
> >
> > I would suggest that we work with the Consul, rather than around him.
> > Disregarding a consul was one of the major causes of last month's nastiness.
> >
> > So, let the debate continue. It is far too early to consider exactly how or
> > when it will be brought to a vote.
> >
> > Vale, Octavius.
> >
> > (I say "we" because I fully intend to return as a citizen of one of the two Nova
> > Romas, if a partition does take place. My present non-citizen status is a
> > protest, and once the entities I am protesting are isolated, my status will change).
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79867 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2010-08-27
Subject: Re: On a possible partition of NR - a consular statement
You are wrong, again.

The Tribunes are not officers! They are observers of the Officers and
report. And while the constitution states they can summon the senate, the
Senatus consulta on the internal rules and procedures clarifies that
Tribunes can only summon the senate in areas related to their Constitutional
authority. Thus matters related to the Corporation are OUTSIDE of their
jurisdiction, same with matters of financial issues - because they are NOT
officers.

So, if Quintilianus summons the senate to dissolve the corp or partition
it. Consul Albucius vetos - it is dead. Having the Tribunes try to
re-summon the senate - isn't going to work. It is DEAD.

Did you not learn a single thing from your attempted Coup?

Vale,

Sulla

On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 5:53 PM, rory12001 <rory12001@...> wrote:

>
>
> Maior Quiritibus spd
>
> you can't stop an officer from calling a Board meeting to conduct the
> Non-profit's business. The tribunes are officers, so is the co-president
> Kaeso Fabius Buteo Quinitllianus. It's not an issue at all.
>
> vale
> Maior
>
> >
> > Maior,
> >
> > Again, the tribunes cannot summon the senate for matters outside of the
> > Tribunes constitutionally specified realm. Try again.
> >
> > Vale,
> >
> > Sulla
> >
> > On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 4:08 PM, rory12001 <rory12001@...> wrote:
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > Salvete;
> > >
> > > Obviously Albucius forgot that the Roman state was called Res Populi
> > > Romani; the business of the Roman People!
> > >
> > > We can certainly have the tribunes call the Senate and have the Senate
> vote
> > > on a resolution and then put it to the people to vote on.
> > >
> > > One co-president can't stop that. Under Maine Non Profit Law. So just
> > > disregard the rest.
> > >
> > > Everyone can read the legal facts for her or hiself here
> > >
> http://www.mainelegislature.org/legis/statutes/13-b/title13-Bsec1101.html
> > > optime valete
> > > M. Hortensia Maior
> > >
> > >
> > > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com <Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com><Nova-Roma%
> 40yahoogroups.com>, "M.
>
> > > Octavius Gracchus" <octaviusgracchus@> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Honoured Consul Albucius,
> > > >
> > > > I understand that you oppose the idea of a partition.
> > > >
> > > > But this is one of the most important questions to face Nova Roma in
> some
> > > time.
> > > >
> > > > Persons on all sides of the political divide are frustrated with the
> > > inaction,
> > > > the lack of any real accomplishments, the constant bullying, the
> threats
> > > of
> > > > legal action, the refusal of magistrates or priests to do their jobs.
> > > >
> > > > This is an issue that transcends the usual factionalism. People who
> never
> > > agree
> > > > with each other on *anything* are united in supporting it; likewise,
> > > long-term
> > > > adversaries are uniting against it.
> > > >
> > > > The idea was presented only *two* *days* *ago*.
> > > >
> > > > Two days is not long enough for a debate of this importance, just
> like it
> > > was
> > > > not long enough to consider a dictatorship last month.
> > > >
> > > > Please, do not state your opposition in such *final* terms.
> > > >
> > > > You do not favour the idea at present; that's fine, I respect that.
> > > >
> > > > But let the debate continue longer than two days; participate,
> explain
> > > your
> > > > reasoning, let the proponents of the plan address your concerns.
> > > >
> > > > Perhaps you'll change your mind. Perhaps not. But don't strangle the
> > > proposal
> > > > before it's had a fair hearing.
> > > >
> > > > Vale, M. Octavius Gracchus,
> > > > Consular.
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
>
>
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79868 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2010-08-27
Subject: Re: On a possible partition of NR - a consular statement
And, I will go on record as stating I have no problem with the Divorce (as I
called it on the BA). But, doing so must be absolutely legal, in compliance
with Maine Law and fulfilling all of the requirements of the Articles of
Incorporation. My problem is that you, Maior, seem to have no problem
recommending a path that is not legal nor in compliance with Maine Law.
Better to be upright and kosher, than to do it in a way where YOU can be
held personally responsible for any illegality.

Vale,

Sulla

On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 6:00 PM, rory12001 <rory12001@...> wrote:

>
>
> M. Hortensia M. Octavio spd;
> bene,. Gracchus and I understand that we're happy to part company. I don't
> hate his group let's call it NR Classic, for convenience, I just don't want
> to have anything to do with them...
>
> I know he feels the same way. It's not Highlander where only ONE can win.
> As Anna Minucia said, Asatru groups have split and prospered.
>
> Better to be 2 prospering groups than what we have now...
> I want an end to the dysfunctional fighting. We both have better things to
> do with our time.
> vale
> Maior
>
> > >
> > > Salve Maior,
>
> > >
> > > > We can certainly have the tribunes call the Senate and have the
> Senate vote on a resolution and then put it to the people to vote on.
> > >
> > > I would suggest that we work with the Consul, rather than around him.
> > > Disregarding a consul was one of the major causes of last month's
> nastiness.
> > >
> > > So, let the debate continue. It is far too early to consider exactly
> how or
> > > when it will be brought to a vote.
> > >
> > > Vale, Octavius.
> > >
> > > (I say "we" because I fully intend to return as a citizen of one of the
> two Nova
> > > Romas, if a partition does take place. My present non-citizen status is
> a
> > > protest, and once the entities I am protesting are isolated, my status
> will change).
> > >
> >
>
>
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79869 From: lathyrus77 Date: 2010-08-27
Subject: Partition Discussion - Pronvinces
Another question I have about a possible separation is how will this effect the provinces? Will each org appoint a governor to each province, so there are 2 governors? Can governors be in both orgs? Can Legates be in both orgs? How do governors collect taxes if some cives are in one org and the rest are in another?


-Anna Bucci

AKA Annia Minucia Marcella
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79870 From: rory12001 Date: 2010-08-27
Subject: Re: On a possible partition of NR - a consular statement
For gods sake Sulla;
I was the one who said here and in the Senate we need the Maine Non Profit Lawyer, all your silly threats mean less than 0 to me.

I want a Maine lawyer to handle the entire businesss and then I will be done with you Cato and your friends forever.
may the gods favour me!!
Maior

-
-- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Robert Woolwine <robert.woolwine@...> wrote:
>
> And, I will go on record as stating I have no problem with the Divorce (as I
> called it on the BA). But, doing so must be absolutely legal, in compliance
> with Maine Law and fulfilling all of the requirements of the Articles of
> Incorporation. My problem is that you, Maior, seem to have no problem
> recommending a path that is not legal nor in compliance with Maine Law.
> Better to be upright and kosher, than to do it in a way where YOU can be
> held personally responsible for any illegality.
>
> Vale,
>
> Sulla
>
> On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 6:00 PM, rory12001 <rory12001@...> wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > M. Hortensia M. Octavio spd;
> > bene,. Gracchus and I understand that we're happy to part company. I don't
> > hate his group let's call it NR Classic, for convenience, I just don't want
> > to have anything to do with them...
> >
> > I know he feels the same way. It's not Highlander where only ONE can win.
> > As Anna Minucia said, Asatru groups have split and prospered.
> >
> > Better to be 2 prospering groups than what we have now...
> > I want an end to the dysfunctional fighting. We both have better things to
> > do with our time.
> > vale
> > Maior
> >
> > > >
> > > > Salve Maior,
> >
> > > >
> > > > > We can certainly have the tribunes call the Senate and have the
> > Senate vote on a resolution and then put it to the people to vote on.
> > > >
> > > > I would suggest that we work with the Consul, rather than around him.
> > > > Disregarding a consul was one of the major causes of last month's
> > nastiness.
> > > >
> > > > So, let the debate continue. It is far too early to consider exactly
> > how or
> > > > when it will be brought to a vote.
> > > >
> > > > Vale, Octavius.
> > > >
> > > > (I say "we" because I fully intend to return as a citizen of one of the
> > two Nova
> > > > Romas, if a partition does take place. My present non-citizen status is
> > a
> > > > protest, and once the entities I am protesting are isolated, my status
> > will change).
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79871 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2010-08-27
Subject: Re: On a possible partition of NR - a consular statement
Yes and that part I have NO problem with!

It is the end run with the Consul that I have a problem with. Geez you are
dense!

On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 6:52 PM, rory12001 <rory12001@...> wrote:

>
>
> For gods sake Sulla;
> I was the one who said here and in the Senate we need the Maine Non Profit
> Lawyer, all your silly threats mean less than 0 to me.
>
> I want a Maine lawyer to handle the entire businesss and then I will be
> done with you Cato and your friends forever.
> may the gods favour me!!
> Maior
>
> -
>
> -- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com <Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com>, Robert
> Woolwine <robert.woolwine@...> wrote:
> >
> > And, I will go on record as stating I have no problem with the Divorce
> (as I
> > called it on the BA). But, doing so must be absolutely legal, in
> compliance
> > with Maine Law and fulfilling all of the requirements of the Articles of
> > Incorporation. My problem is that you, Maior, seem to have no problem
> > recommending a path that is not legal nor in compliance with Maine Law.
> > Better to be upright and kosher, than to do it in a way where YOU can be
> > held personally responsible for any illegality.
> >
> > Vale,
> >
> > Sulla
> >
> > On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 6:00 PM, rory12001 <rory12001@...> wrote:
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > M. Hortensia M. Octavio spd;
> > > bene,. Gracchus and I understand that we're happy to part company. I
> don't
> > > hate his group let's call it NR Classic, for convenience, I just don't
> want
> > > to have anything to do with them...
> > >
> > > I know he feels the same way. It's not Highlander where only ONE can
> win.
> > > As Anna Minucia said, Asatru groups have split and prospered.
> > >
> > > Better to be 2 prospering groups than what we have now...
> > > I want an end to the dysfunctional fighting. We both have better things
> to
> > > do with our time.
> > > vale
> > > Maior
> > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Salve Maior,
> > >
> > > > >
> > > > > > We can certainly have the tribunes call the Senate and have the
> > > Senate vote on a resolution and then put it to the people to vote on.
> > > > >
> > > > > I would suggest that we work with the Consul, rather than around
> him.
> > > > > Disregarding a consul was one of the major causes of last month's
> > > nastiness.
> > > > >
> > > > > So, let the debate continue. It is far too early to consider
> exactly
> > > how or
> > > > > when it will be brought to a vote.
> > > > >
> > > > > Vale, Octavius.
> > > > >
> > > > > (I say "we" because I fully intend to return as a citizen of one of
> the
> > > two Nova
> > > > > Romas, if a partition does take place. My present non-citizen
> status is
> > > a
> > > > > protest, and once the entities I am protesting are isolated, my
> status
> > > will change).
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
>
>
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79872 From: Cato Date: 2010-08-27
Subject: Re: On a possible partition of NR - a consular statement
Cato Maiori sal.

Actually, the tribunes are *not* officers according to our by-laws.

The officers of the corporation are the censors, the consuls, the praetors, and the quaestors.

Your statement:

"We can certainly have the tribunes call the Senate and have the Senate vote on a resolution..."

is also incorrect. The tribunes' authority to call the Senate is quite clearly restricted under our by-laws.

Vale,

Cato


--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "rory12001" <rory12001@...> wrote:
>
> Maior Quiritibus spd
>
> you can't stop an officer from calling a Board meeting to conduct the Non-profit's business. The tribunes are officers, so is the co-president Kaeso Fabius Buteo Quinitllianus. It's not an issue at all.
>
> vale
> Maior
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79873 From: lathyrus77 Date: 2010-08-27
Subject: Re: On a possible partition of NR - a consular statement
--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Robert Woolwine <robert.woolwine@...> wrote:
>
> Yes and that part I have NO problem with!
>
> It is the end run with the Consul that I have a problem with. Geez you are
> dense!
>


Matt did a better job of saying it than you. You're just an irritant.



-Anna Bucci


AKA Annia Minucia Marcella
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79875 From: Cato Date: 2010-08-27
Subject: Re: On a possible partition of NR - a consular statement
Cato Maiori sal.

You *could* be "done with you Cato and your friends forever" if *you* left,
Maior. Then apparently we wouldn't need to even consider dissolving the
corporation or ripping the Resublica apart.

Vale,

Cato

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "rory12001" <rory12001@...> wrote:
>
> For gods sake Sulla;
> I was the one who said here and in the Senate we need the Maine Non Profit Lawyer, all your silly threats mean less than 0 to me.
>
> I want a Maine lawyer to handle the entire businesss and then I will be done with you Cato and your friends forever.
> may the gods favour me!!
> Maior
>
> -
> -- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Robert Woolwine <robert.woolwine@> wrote:
> >
> > And, I will go on record as stating I have no problem with the Divorce (as I
> > called it on the BA). But, doing so must be absolutely legal, in compliance
> > with Maine Law and fulfilling all of the requirements of the Articles of
> > Incorporation. My problem is that you, Maior, seem to have no problem
> > recommending a path that is not legal nor in compliance with Maine Law.
> > Better to be upright and kosher, than to do it in a way where YOU can be
> > held personally responsible for any illegality.
> >
> > Vale,
> >
> > Sulla
> >
> > On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 6:00 PM, rory12001 <rory12001@> wrote:
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > M. Hortensia M. Octavio spd;
> > > bene,. Gracchus and I understand that we're happy to part company. I don't
> > > hate his group let's call it NR Classic, for convenience, I just don't want
> > > to have anything to do with them...
> > >
> > > I know he feels the same way. It's not Highlander where only ONE can win.
> > > As Anna Minucia said, Asatru groups have split and prospered.
> > >
> > > Better to be 2 prospering groups than what we have now...
> > > I want an end to the dysfunctional fighting. We both have better things to
> > > do with our time.
> > > vale
> > > Maior
> > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Salve Maior,
> > >
> > > > >
> > > > > > We can certainly have the tribunes call the Senate and have the
> > > Senate vote on a resolution and then put it to the people to vote on.
> > > > >
> > > > > I would suggest that we work with the Consul, rather than around him.
> > > > > Disregarding a consul was one of the major causes of last month's
> > > nastiness.
> > > > >
> > > > > So, let the debate continue. It is far too early to consider exactly
> > > how or
> > > > > when it will be brought to a vote.
> > > > >
> > > > > Vale, Octavius.
> > > > >
> > > > > (I say "we" because I fully intend to return as a citizen of one of the
> > > two Nova
> > > > > Romas, if a partition does take place. My present non-citizen status is
> > > a
> > > > > protest, and once the entities I am protesting are isolated, my status
> > > will change).
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 79876 From: lathyrus77 Date: 2010-08-27
Subject: Re: On a possible partition of NR - a consular statement
Actually none of that really matters right now.

I'm glad you all feel the need to correct Maior anytime she speaks about proper procedures and offices and who can do what blah blah blah, but it's all irrelevent. Why is it irrelevent? Cause we're still just talking about separation, you're not actually deciding anything, or putting anything up for a vote, or convening anyone to talk about voting, etc.


And perhaps you can correct maior some other time when things are going to be put in motion. Let's focus guys. You really don't need to correct every single thing Maior says. Seriously, you guys never believe what she says anyway; we get it.


-Anna Bucci

AKA Annia Minucia Marcella


--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Cato" <catoinnyc@...> wrote:
>
> Cato Maiori sal.
>
> Actually, the tribunes are *not* officers according to our by-laws.
>
> The officers of the corporation are the censors, the consuls, the praetors, and the quaestors.
>
> Your statement:
>
> "We can certainly have the tribunes call the Senate and have the Senate vote on a resolution..."
>
> is also incorrect. The tribunes' authority to call the Senate is quite clearly restricted under our by-laws.
>
> Vale,
>
> Cato
>
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "rory12001" <rory12001@> wrote:
> >
> > Maior Quiritibus spd
> >
> > you can't stop an officer from calling a Board meeting to conduct the Non-profit's business. The tribunes are officers, so is the co-president Kaeso Fabius Buteo Quinitllianus. It's not an issue at all.
> >
> > vale
> > Maior
>