Selected messages in Nova-Roma group. Nov 7-18, 2010

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81799 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2010-11-07
Subject: Re: Sad development - Pompeii
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81800 From: Timothy or Stephen Gallagher Date: 2010-11-07
Subject: RE: [Nova-Roma] Re: “Peak Civilization” : The Fall of the Roman
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81801 From: Susan Date: 2010-11-07
Subject: Re: Resignation from the Board of Directors
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81802 From: Cato Date: 2010-11-07
Subject: a.d VII Id. Nov.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81803 From: Q. Fabius Maximus Date: 2010-11-07
Subject: Re: [Nova- Roma] Re: “Peak Civi lization” : The Fall of the R
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81804 From: lathyrus77 Date: 2010-11-07
Subject: Re: Resignation from the Board of Directors
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81805 From: Susan Date: 2010-11-07
Subject: Re: Resignation from the Board of Directors
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81806 From: Perusianus Date: 2010-11-07
Subject: Re: Sad development - Pompeii
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81807 From: Ass.Pomerium Date: 2010-11-07
Subject: I: Signa Romanorum (nuovo aggiornamento/new update)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81808 From: Cato Date: 2010-11-08
Subject: a.d. VI Id. Nov.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81809 From: M•IVL•SEVERVS Date: 2010-11-08
Subject: Re: Notice of Moderation
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81811 From: Publius Memmius Albucius Date: 2010-11-08
Subject: Re: Notice of Moderation
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81812 From: petronius_dexter Date: 2010-11-08
Subject: Re: Notice of Moderation
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81813 From: Robert Date: 2010-11-08
Subject: Re: Notice of Moderation
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81814 From: Q. Fabius Maximus Date: 2010-11-08
Subject: Re: Notice of Moderation
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81815 From: Cato Date: 2010-11-08
Subject: Re: Notice of Moderation
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81816 From: luciaiuliaaquila Date: 2010-11-08
Subject: Nov 2010 Senate Session
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81817 From: iulius sabinus Date: 2010-11-08
Subject: Re: Nov 2010 Senate Session
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81818 From: Timothy or Stephen Gallagher Date: 2010-11-08
Subject: Re: Notice of Moderation
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81819 From: Diana Octavia Date: 2010-11-09
Subject: Re: Resignation from the Board of Directors
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81820 From: Diana Octavia Date: 2010-11-09
Subject: Re: Sad development - Pompeii
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81821 From: Gnaeus Iulius Caesar Date: 2010-11-09
Subject: Re: Resignation from the Board of Directors
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81822 From: lathyrus77 Date: 2010-11-09
Subject: Re: Notice of Moderation
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81823 From: Cato Date: 2010-11-09
Subject: a.d. IV Id. Nov.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81824 From: Publius Memmius Albucius Date: 2010-11-09
Subject: The senate/board is called to another session in November
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81825 From: luciaiuliaaquila Date: 2010-11-09
Subject: Re: Nov 2010 Senate Session
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81826 From: william Date: 2010-11-09
Subject: import info
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81827 From: iulius sabinus Date: 2010-11-09
Subject: Re: import info
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81828 From: QFabiusMaxmi@aol.com Date: 2010-11-09
Subject: Re: Notice of Moderation
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81829 From: Cato Date: 2010-11-10
Subject: a.d. IV Id. Nov.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81830 From: Diana Octavia Date: 2010-11-10
Subject: Re: Resignation from the Board of Directors
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81831 From: lathyrus77 Date: 2010-11-10
Subject: Re: Notice of Moderation
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81832 From: Sabinus Date: 2010-11-10
Subject: The Collegium Pontificum is called into session.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81833 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2010-11-10
Subject: Re: The Collegium Pontificum is called into session.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81834 From: iulius sabinus Date: 2010-11-10
Subject: Re: The Collegium Pontificum is called into session.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81835 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2010-11-10
Subject: Re: The Collegium Pontificum is called into session.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81836 From: iulius sabinus Date: 2010-11-10
Subject: Re: The Collegium Pontificum is called into session.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81837 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2010-11-10
Subject: Re: Notice of Moderation
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81838 From: lathyrus77 Date: 2010-11-11
Subject: Re: Notice of Moderation
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81839 From: Cato Date: 2010-11-11
Subject: a.d. III Id. Nov.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81840 From: C.Maria Caeca Date: 2010-11-11
Subject: Rememberance
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81841 From: Publius Memmius Albucius Date: 2010-11-11
Subject: The senate is called in session (Nov. nb 2)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81842 From: Timothy or Stephen Gallagher Date: 2010-11-11
Subject: Re: Rememberance
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81843 From: C.Maria Caeca Date: 2010-11-11
Subject: Re: Rememberance
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81844 From: publiusalbucius Date: 2010-11-11
Subject: Re: Rememberance
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81845 From: Marcus Prometheus Date: 2010-11-11
Subject: Italy: Would you like fries with your art history?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81846 From: GAIUS MARCIUS CRISPUS Date: 2010-11-11
Subject: Re: Rememberance
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81847 From: David Kling Date: 2010-11-11
Subject: Re: Rememberance
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81848 From: Publius Ullerius Stephanus Venator Date: 2010-11-11
Subject: Re: Rememberance
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81849 From: Jean-François Arnoud Date: 2010-11-11
Subject: Re : [Nova-Roma] Rememberance
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81850 From: Cato Date: 2010-11-12
Subject: prid. Id. Nov.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81851 From: Q. Fabius Maximus Date: 2010-11-12
Subject: Re: : [Nova-Roma] Rememberance
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81852 From: Publius Memmius Albucius Date: 2010-11-12
Subject: Curule, qu. and vigint. ELECTIONS for 2764 - CALL for CANDIDATES
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81853 From: Gaius Petronius Dexter Date: 2010-11-12
Subject: Call for Plebeian candidates 2763/2764 aVc.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81854 From: Timothy or Stephen Gallagher Date: 2010-11-12
Subject: Coming in February
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81855 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2010-11-12
Subject: Re: [BackAlley] Coming in February
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81856 From: ndduffy1975@yahoo.com Date: 2010-11-12
Subject: Pompeii
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81857 From: Cato Date: 2010-11-13
Subject: IDIBUS NOVEMBRIBUS
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81858 From: Kirsteen Wright Date: 2010-11-13
Subject: Re: Pompeii
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81859 From: M. Valerius Chlorus Date: 2010-11-13
Subject: Re: Call for Plebeian candidates 2763/2764 aVc.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81860 From: C.Maria Caeca Date: 2010-11-13
Subject: statement of intent
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81861 From: Gaius Tullius Valerianus Date: 2010-11-13
Subject: Announcement: Candidacy for Tribune
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81862 From: Cato Date: 2010-11-13
Subject: Announcement: Candidacy for Consul
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81863 From: mcorvvs Date: 2010-11-14
Subject: Re: Ides ritual performed by Sacerdos Iovis M.Octavius Corvus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81864 From: C.Maria Caeca Date: 2010-11-14
Subject: more conventus stuff
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81865 From: QFabiusMaxmi@aol.com Date: 2010-11-14
Subject: Re: Announcement: Candidacy for Praetor
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81866 From: David Kling Date: 2010-11-14
Subject: Re: Announcement: Candidacy for Praetor
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81867 From: Cato Date: 2010-11-14
Subject: a.d. XVIII Kal. Dec.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81868 From: Publius Memmius Albucius Date: 2010-11-14
Subject: LIST of our ASSIDUI - Update of pr. Idus Nov. 2763 (11-12, 2010)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81869 From: Publius Memmius Albucius Date: 2010-11-14
Subject: Certificate - Provinces Britannia and California
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81870 From: David Kling Date: 2010-11-14
Subject: Re: Certificate - Provinces Britannia and California
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81871 From: GAIUS MARCIUS CRISPUS Date: 2010-11-14
Subject: Re: Certificate - Provinces Britannia and California
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81872 From: Kirsteen Wright Date: 2010-11-14
Subject: Re: Certificate - Provinces Britannia and California
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81873 From: GAIUS MARCIUS CRISPUS Date: 2010-11-14
Subject: Re: Certificate - Provinces Britannia and California
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81874 From: Gnaeus Iulius Caesar Date: 2010-11-14
Subject: Candidate for Praetor
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81875 From: Timothy or Stephen Gallagher Date: 2010-11-14
Subject: FW: [Explorator] explorator 13.30
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81876 From: Cato Date: 2010-11-14
Subject: Consular Intentions
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81877 From: David Kling Date: 2010-11-14
Subject: Re: Consular Intentions
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81878 From: myles kroll Date: 2010-11-15
Subject: Hello all
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81879 From: Cato Date: 2010-11-15
Subject: a.d. XVII Kal. Dec.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81880 From: James V Hooper Date: 2010-11-15
Subject: Re: Hello all
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81881 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2010-11-15
Subject: Thanksgiving Invitation
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81882 From: GAIUS MARCIUS CRISPUS Date: 2010-11-15
Subject: Britannia - reviving our Provincial activity
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81883 From: Marcus Prometheus Date: 2010-11-16
Subject: Quando crollavano le Mura Aureliane e i ministri di sinistra mica si
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81884 From: Cn. Cornelius Lentulus Date: 2010-11-16
Subject: ORDO EQUESTER - The Solution Needed
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81885 From: Publius Memmius Albucius Date: 2010-11-16
Subject: Re: ORDO EQUESTER - The Solution Needed
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81886 From: luciaiuliaaquila Date: 2010-11-16
Subject: Re: ORDO EQUESTER - The Solution Needed
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81887 From: luciaiuliaaquila Date: 2010-11-16
Subject: Re: Certificate - Provinces Britannia and California
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81888 From: luciaiuliaaquila Date: 2010-11-16
Subject: Re: Thanksgiving Invitation
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81889 From: luciaiuliaaquila Date: 2010-11-16
Subject: Re: statement of intent
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81890 From: David Kling Date: 2010-11-16
Subject: Re: Thanksgiving Invitation
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81891 From: Cato Date: 2010-11-16
Subject: a.d. XVI Kal. Dec.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81892 From: Cato Date: 2010-11-16
Subject: Re: ORDO EQUESTER - The Solution Needed
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81893 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2010-11-16
Subject: Re: Thanksgiving Invitation
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81894 From: Aqvillivs Date: 2010-11-16
Subject: Senate Session Report/ I. Nov. 2763/TRIB. ROTA
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81895 From: David Kling Date: 2010-11-16
Subject: Re: ORDO EQUESTER - The Solution Needed
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81896 From: Cato Date: 2010-11-16
Subject: Re: ORDO EQUESTER - The Solution Needed
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81897 From: David Kling Date: 2010-11-16
Subject: Re: ORDO EQUESTER - The Solution Needed
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81898 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2010-11-16
Subject: Re: ORDO EQUESTER - The Solution Needed
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81899 From: GAIUS MARCIUS CRISPUS Date: 2010-11-16
Subject: Re: Certificate - Provinces Britannia and California
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81900 From: publiusalbucius Date: 2010-11-16
Subject: Re: ORDO EQUESTER - The Solution Needed
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81901 From: Cn. Cornelius Lentulus Date: 2010-11-16
Subject: R: [Nova-Roma] Re: ORDO EQUESTER - The Solution Needed
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81902 From: luciaiuliaaquila Date: 2010-11-16
Subject: Re: ORDO EQUESTER - The Solution Needed
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81903 From: Cato Date: 2010-11-16
Subject: Re: ORDO EQUESTER - The Solution Needed
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81904 From: David Kling Date: 2010-11-16
Subject: Re: ORDO EQUESTER - The Solution Needed
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81905 From: luciaiuliaaquila Date: 2010-11-16
Subject: Re: Thanksgiving Invitation
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81906 From: Cato Date: 2010-11-16
Subject: Re: ORDO EQUESTER - The Solution Needed
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81907 From: David Kling Date: 2010-11-16
Subject: Re: ORDO EQUESTER - The Solution Needed
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81908 From: luciaiuliaaquila Date: 2010-11-16
Subject: R: [Nova-Roma] Re: ORDO EQUESTER - The Solution Needed
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81909 From: Cato Date: 2010-11-16
Subject: Re: ORDO EQUESTER - The Solution Needed
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81910 From: Cato Date: 2010-11-16
Subject: Re: ORDO EQUESTER - The Solution Needed
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81911 From: luciaiuliaaquila Date: 2010-11-16
Subject: Re: ORDO EQUESTER - The Solution Needed
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81912 From: GAIUS MARCIUS CRISPUS Date: 2010-11-16
Subject: Re: ORDO EQUESTER - The Solution Needed
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81913 From: C.Maria Caeca Date: 2010-11-16
Subject: Re: ORDO EQUESTER - The Solution Needed
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81914 From: C.Maria Caeca Date: 2010-11-16
Subject: Re: Senate Session Report/ I. Nov. 2763/TRIB. ROTA
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81915 From: C.Maria Caeca Date: 2010-11-16
Subject: Re: statement of intent
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81916 From: Cato Date: 2010-11-16
Subject: Re: ORDO EQUESTER - The Solution Needed
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81917 From: Cato Date: 2010-11-16
Subject: Re: Senate Session Report/ I. Nov. 2763/TRIB. ROTA
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81918 From: luciaiuliaaquila Date: 2010-11-16
Subject: Re: ORDO EQUESTER - The Solution Needed
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81919 From: C.Maria Caeca Date: 2010-11-16
Subject: Re: Senate Session Report/ I. Nov. 2763/TRIB. ROTA
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81920 From: luciaiuliaaquila Date: 2010-11-16
Subject: Re: Senate Session Report/ I. Nov. 2763/TRIB. ROTA
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81921 From: Tragedienne Date: 2010-11-16
Subject: Re: Thanksgiving Invitation
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81922 From: C.Maria Caeca Date: 2010-11-16
Subject: Re: Senate Session Report/ I. Nov. 2763/TRIB. ROTA
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81923 From: David Kling Date: 2010-11-16
Subject: Re: ORDO EQUESTER - The Solution Needed
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81924 From: petronius_dexter Date: 2010-11-16
Subject: Re: ORDO EQUESTER - The Solution Needed
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81925 From: iulius sabinus Date: 2010-11-16
Subject: Re: ORDO EQUESTER - The Solution Needed
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81926 From: C.Maria Caeca Date: 2010-11-17
Subject: Senate Item IX, creation of a new forum
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81927 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2010-11-17
Subject: Re: Senate Session Report/ I. Nov. 2763/TRIB. ROTA
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81928 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2010-11-17
Subject: Re: ORDO EQUESTER - The Solution Needed
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81929 From: Cato Date: 2010-11-17
Subject: a.d XV Kal. Dec.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81930 From: Cato Date: 2010-11-17
Subject: Re: ORDO EQUESTER - The Solution Needed
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81931 From: Cato Date: 2010-11-17
Subject: Re: Senate Item IX, creation of a new forum
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81932 From: Cato Date: 2010-11-17
Subject: Re: ORDO EQUESTER - The Solution Needed
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81933 From: David Kling Date: 2010-11-17
Subject: Re: Senate Item IX, creation of a new forum
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81934 From: Cato Date: 2010-11-17
Subject: Re: Senate Item IX, creation of a new forum
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81935 From: Aqvillivs Date: 2010-11-17
Subject: Resignation from Cohors Aedilicia
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81936 From: Cn. Cornelius Lentulus Date: 2010-11-17
Subject: R: [Nova-Roma] Re: ORDO EQUESTER - The Solution Needed
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81937 From: Publius Memmius Albucius Date: 2010-11-17
Subject: *IMPORTANT* - to all here who are not Nova Roma members
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81938 From: Cn. Cornelius Lentulus Date: 2010-11-17
Subject: R: [Nova-Roma] Re: ORDO EQUESTER - The Solution Needed
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81939 From: Cn. Cornelius Lentulus Date: 2010-11-17
Subject: R: [Nova-Roma] Re: ORDO EQUESTER - The Solution Needed
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81940 From: gualterus_graecus Date: 2010-11-17
Subject: R: [Nova-Roma] Re: ORDO EQUESTER - The Solution Needed
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81941 From: Matt Hucke Date: 2010-11-17
Subject: Re: R: [Nova-Roma] Re: ORDO EQUESTER - The Solution Needed
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81942 From: Robert Date: 2010-11-17
Subject: Re: R: [Nova-Roma] Re: ORDO EQUESTER - The Solution Needed
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81943 From: gualterus_graecus Date: 2010-11-17
Subject: R: [Nova-Roma] Re: ORDO EQUESTER - The Solution Needed
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81944 From: lathyrus77 Date: 2010-11-17
Subject: Re: *IMPORTANT* - to all here who are not Nova Roma members
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81945 From: L. Livia Plauta Date: 2010-11-17
Subject: Re: *IMPORTANT* - to all here who are not Nova Roma members
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81946 From: lathyrus77 Date: 2010-11-17
Subject: Re: *IMPORTANT* - to all here who are not Nova Roma members
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81947 From: petronius_dexter Date: 2010-11-17
Subject: R: [Nova-Roma] Re: ORDO EQUESTER - The Solution Needed
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81948 From: quintus_claudius_crispus Date: 2010-11-18
Subject: Re: *IMPORTANT* - to all here who are not Nova Roma members
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81949 From: David Kling Date: 2010-11-18
Subject: Re: *IMPORTANT* - to all here who are not Nova Roma members
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81950 From: Cato Date: 2010-11-18
Subject: a.d. XIV Kal. Dec.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81951 From: lathyrus77 Date: 2010-11-18
Subject: Re: *IMPORTANT* - to all here who are not Nova Roma members
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81952 From: Cato Date: 2010-11-18
Subject: Re: *IMPORTANT* - to all here who are not Nova Roma members
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81953 From: Cato Date: 2010-11-18
Subject: Re: *IMPORTANT* - to all here who are not Nova Roma members
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81954 From: Cn. Cornelius Lentulus Date: 2010-11-18
Subject: R: [Nova-Roma] Re: ORDO EQUESTER - The Solution Needed
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81955 From: Gaius Date: 2010-11-18
Subject: Re: *IMPORTANT* - to all here who are not Nova Roma members
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81956 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2010-11-18
Subject: ABSTRACT: Many waters: Bathing ethe of Roman Palestine
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81957 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2010-11-18
Subject: ABSTRACT: The reinvention of Judean collective identity in a Helleni
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81958 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2010-11-18
Subject: ABSTRACT: Antiochus IV and the Jews of Palestine: Causes and effects
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81959 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2010-11-18
Subject: ABSTRACT: Tribute and taxes in early Roman Palestine (63 BCE-70 CE):
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81960 From: luciaiuliaaquila Date: 2010-11-18
Subject: R: [Nova-Roma] Re: ORDO EQUESTER - The Solution Needed
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81961 From: luciaiuliaaquila Date: 2010-11-18
Subject: R: [Nova-Roma] Re: ORDO EQUESTER - The Solution Needed
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81962 From: Q. Fabius Maximus Date: 2010-11-18
Subject: Re: R: [Nova-Roma] Re: ORDO EQUESTER - The Solution Needed
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81963 From: Q. Fabius Maximus Date: 2010-11-18
Subject: Re: R: [Nova-Roma] Re: ORDO EQUESTER - The Solution Needed
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81964 From: Marcus Prometheus Date: 2010-11-18
Subject: 193 Foto di POMPEI - POMPEI 193 pics
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81965 From: Q. Fabius Maximus Date: 2010-11-18
Subject: To all Nova Romanoi in the LA Area
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81966 From: Quintus Valerius Poplicola Date: 2010-11-18
Subject: Re: ORDO EQUESTER - The Solution Needed
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81967 From: luciaiuliaaquila Date: 2010-11-18
Subject: R: [Nova-Roma] Re: ORDO EQUESTER - The Solution Needed
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81968 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2010-11-18
Subject: Re: ORDO EQUESTER - The Solution Needed
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81969 From: luciaiuliaaquila Date: 2010-11-18
Subject: R: [Nova-Roma] Re: ORDO EQUESTER - The Solution Needed
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81970 From: luciaiuliaaquila Date: 2010-11-18
Subject: Re: ORDO EQUESTER - The Solution Needed
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81971 From: C.Maria Caeca Date: 2010-11-18
Subject: Re: ORDO EQUESTER - The Solution Needed
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81972 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2010-11-18
Subject: Re: ORDO EQUESTER - The Solution Needed
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81973 From: C.Maria Caeca Date: 2010-11-18
Subject: Re: ORDO EQUESTER - The Solution Needed
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81974 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2010-11-18
Subject: Re: ORDO EQUESTER - The Solution Needed
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81975 From: mcorvvs Date: 2010-11-18
Subject: Re: Senate Session Report/ I. Nov. 2763/TRIB. ROTA



Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81799 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2010-11-07
Subject: Re: Sad development - Pompeii
Ave!

Glad the idea might be helpful. Even when I was recently in New England I
wrote notes so that I could write fuller reports (that is something I am
currently working on). The more detail allows you to relive the experiences
even years later. :) OOOH Good idea about that getting topics for your
paper or seminar!

Hehe your experiences remind me about my desire to go back to Israel knowing
how much I want to get back there! Oh and one thing my boss told me,
depending on how long you will be there was to only really plan for the
first few days.

Anyway, I hope you spend most if not all of your trip in Italy/Rome to get
all the fill that you want too! :) Awww dont be nervious about being
alone. I am sure there are plenty of Nova Romans in the vicinity that would
met up with you and show you places that are outside of the tourist areas.
:)

Respectfully,

Sulla

On Sat, Nov 6, 2010 at 10:07 PM, Leah Bernardo-Ciddio <lbciddio@...>wrote:

>
>
> Salve,
>
> That sounds like a good idea! I love to write journals so I'll probably
> bring a notebook in which I can write things down, even when I'm out and
> about. I might even come across a good topic for a paper or a seminar while
> I'm there!
>
> I was actually in Rome in 2006 - and yes, the camcorder really did come in
> handy then! I decided I had to go back though - I was only there for four
> days before we skipped off to Athens, and my love of Rome and Roman history
> was only just budding, so I really could not appreciate it as much as I
> will
> now. Sixteen-year-old me was a lot less educated and therefore a lot less
> awestruck!
>
> It certainly should be a good time. I'm a bit nervous as I'll be completely
> alone, but I am really looking forward to the adventure.
>
> Vale,
> Ocella
>
> On Sun, Nov 7, 2010 at 12:59 AM, Robert Woolwine
> <robert.woolwine@... <robert.woolwine%40gmail.com>>wrote:
>
>
> > Ave!
> >
> > OH sounds awesome!
> >
> > When I went on my one major major vacation I did AARs (After Action
> > Reports)
> > for each day. Every once in a while I go back to my blog to read them and
> > its like I sort of relive the experience with all the details I tried to
> > get
> > in there. And, camcorder, if you have one and do any tours I cant stress
> > the enjoyment enough. My boss also has given lots of tips, in case this
> is
> > your first trip overseas. If you might be interested. I am so jealous, I
> > am sure you will have the time of your life!!!! :)
> >
> > Vale,
> >
> > Sulla
> >
> > On Sat, Nov 6, 2010 at 9:55 PM, Gnaea Livia Ocella <lbciddio@...<lbciddio%40gmail.com>
> > >wrote:
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > Salve,
> > >
> > > Yes, I'm escaping to Italy during my Winter Reading Week. Might not be
> > the
> > > best idea considering all the papers I'll have due the month after, but
> > I'll
> > > manage.
> > >
> > > I'll be in Rome mostly, but I plan to spend at least one day in
> Pompeii.
> > I
> > > will definitely take a lot of photos - which reminds me that I need to
> > start
> > > hunting around for a new memory card thing (no idea what they're really
> > > called) for my camera.
> > >
> > > Hopefully nothing else collapses within the next little while! These
> > things
> > > are becoming more and more frequent; if I remember correctly, a crane
> > fell
> > > into and knocked over the House of the Chaste Lovers last winter.
> > >
> > > Vale,
> > > Ocella
> > >
> > >
> > > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com <Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com><Nova-Roma%
> 40yahoogroups.com>, Robert
>
> > > Woolwine <robert.woolwine@...> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Ave,
> > > >
> > > > You are going in February? THAT IS SO COOL!!!! How long are you going
> > to
> > > > be there? PLEASE take tons of pics!
> > > >
> > > > Vale,
> > > >
> > > > Sulla
> > > >
> > > > On Sat, Nov 6, 2010 at 9:48 PM, Gnaea Livia Ocella <lbciddio@
> > ...>wrote:
> > >
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Salvete,
> > > > >
> > > > > Truly tragic. I've been moping around about it all day. Was looking
> > > forward
> > > > > to seeing that in February - now it's lost. Hopefully they can
> > salvage
> > > > > something from the rubble.
> > > > >
> > > > > Valete,
> > > > > Ocella
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com <Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com><Nova-Roma%
> 40yahoogroups.com
> > ><Nova-Roma%
> > > 40yahoogroups.com>, Publius
> > >
> > > > > Ullerius Stephanus Venator <famila.ulleria.venii@> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Salvete omnes;
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The so-called "House of the Gladiators" has collapsed:
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > >
> >
> http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20101106/ap_on_re_eu/eu_italy_pompeii_collapse
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > In amicitia et fide
> > > > > > P Ullerius Stephanus Venator
> > > > > > Civis et Poeta
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Sodalitas Coquuorum et Cerevisiae Coctorum
> > > > > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Sodalis_Coq_et_Coq/
> > > > > >
> > > > > > (sites subject to occasional updates)
> > > > > > http://www.facebook.com/p.ullerius.stfnus.venator
> > > > > > http://nrfb.korsoft.com/
> > > > > > http://www.catamount-grange-hearth.org/
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------------
> >
> > Yahoo! Groups Links
>
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81800 From: Timothy or Stephen Gallagher Date: 2010-11-07
Subject: RE: [Nova-Roma] Re: “Peak Civilization” : The Fall of the Roman
Salvete,

The mistake ( hindsight being 20/20) was that Augustus used this disaster as a means to end ( for the most part) Roman expansion. They needed to put all of those on the dole (and fit) in the Army and make them earn their keep. Then they should have conquer Germany and not stopped until they reached the Urals. Hail Rome!!

Valete,

Ti. Galerius Paulinus




To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
From: jfarnoud94@...
Date: Sun, 7 Nov 2010 03:21:12 +0000
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: �Peak Civilization� : The Fall of the Roman Empire (in system dynamics interpretation of Joseph Tainter, an essai of Ugo Bardi)






C. Petronius M. Prometheo s.p.d.,

> This year, 2009, marks the 2000th anniversary of of the battle of Teutoburg,fought in September 9 a.d. the battle that led to the annihilation of three Roman legions and changed forever the history of Europe. It was a tremendous shock for the Romans, who saw their mighty army destroyed by uncivilized barbarians.<

Lol. Is it German propaganda?

> It was not yet the peak of the Roman Empire,

Indeed, it was the beginning of the 5 centuries Roman Empire period.

Optime vale.

C. Petronius Dexter
Arcoiali scribebat
A. d. VII Idus Novembres P. Memmio K. Fabio II coss.





[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81801 From: Susan Date: 2010-11-07
Subject: Re: Resignation from the Board of Directors
Salve Anna, Lathyrus 77, salvete omnes:



--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "lathyrus77" <lathyrus77@...> wrote:
>
>
>
>
> >
> > [snippage for brevity only]

Annia writes:
>
>
> Salve,
>
> The censors may remove a senator for non-payment of taxes but I can not find the lex that says a senator may be suspended from speaking on the senate mailing list before they are removed by the censors from the senate.

Pompeia: Neither can I, likely the only thing in this thread I can agree with you on.
When a lex does not exist Anna, by NR's legal system one defaults to the constitution (no lex, or absence of a lex, can override the constitution as NR's current supreme document, that's a given, see the constitution)
Sooooo...this defaults to the following NR constitutional language concerning the power of the elected Censors :

***d. To maintain the album senatorum (list of Senators), including the power to add and remove names on that list according to qualifications set by law; ***

Pompeia continues: Now to the qualifications set by law...we *do* have a law which states, among other things, that Senators , be they BoD members or just *s*enators active by virtue of previous office (the prevailing taxation law doesn't discriminate), must pay taxes to remain active..This, in the absence of any law specifying otherwise, gives the remaining active Censor leave to use some judgement in how to legally remedy matters, so.... this can well include dismissal of a noncompliant Senator from the Senate forum. Please reread the clause I just quoted if you remain in doubt.

You don't like the situation? This doesn't make it illegal. It is actually illegal to maintain officials in their positions who are not qualified to populate them. Remember that magistrates, including Censores, take an oath to honour the constitution.

So Piscinus was removed from a list he is no longer qualified to be on..this is fair game. And I think this is common sense; if you don't pay your taxes, by law you cannot hold your position, period. And I would expect elected officials, (and Piscinus was once a Consul), to be versed on the legislation he is bound by as Senator. I can appreciate where the censor might think that Piscinus, or any other non taxpaying Senator, has no immediate business on the Senate list.

The Senate by the constitution can mandate taxes, the consuls issue annual tax edicts on the Senate's behalf, citing amounts payable and payment deadlines; and as said, there is a peoples' law which mandates that magistrates and senators pay dues.

Anna, you're a smart girl. I don't think you need this explanation. And nobody *owes* you this explanation... However, you do come off as chair to an inquisition sometimes, and usually those times are when those you sympathize with are in trouble. Take care that you are not being used as an attack poodle. Let them explain themselves....shouldn't be that tough for them if they travel the road of truth and virtue.

But I write in part for the benefit of those who might be curious as to why the Censor did what he did in light of what Annia has written...well, because he has a constitution to uphold, and because the Senate sets taxes, and a lex says the Senators must pay them, and if they don't, they can't be Senators, plain and simple.

Lastly *yawn*, if said suspended Senator wishes to resign from the Senate because of the Censor's legal reaction to said Senator's inattention to longstanding legal obligations, well then, that is said Senator's prerogative.

>
>
> Vale,
>
> Anna Bucci

Pompeia
Consularis Novae Romae
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81802 From: Cato Date: 2010-11-07
Subject: a.d VII Id. Nov.
Cato omnibus in foro SPD

Hodiernus dies est ante diem VII Idus Novembris; haec dies comitialis est.

"L. Papirius Crassus and L. Plautius Venox were thereupon elected
consuls, the former for the second time. At the beginning of the year
deputations came from Fabrateria and Luca, places belonging to the
Volscians, with a request to be received into the protection of Rome,
whose overlordship they would faithfully and loyally acknowledge if
they would undertake to defend them from the Samnites. The senate
acceded to their request, and sent to warn the Samnites against
violating the territory of these two cities. The Samnites took the
warning, not because they were anxious for peace, but because they
were not yet ready for war. This year a war commenced with Privernum
and its ally, Fundi; their commander was a Fundan, Vitrubius Baccus, a
man of great distinction not only in his own city but even in Rome,
where he had a house on the Palatine, which was afterwards destroyed
and the site sold, the place being thenceforth known as the Bacci
Prata. Whilst he was spreading devastation far and wide through the
districts of Setia, Norba, and Cora, L. Papirius advanced against him
and took up a position not far from his camp. Vitrubius had neither
the prudence to remain within his lines in presence of an enemy
stronger than himself nor the courage to fight at a distance from his
camp. He gave battle whilst his men were hardly clear of their camp,
and thinking more of retreating back to it than of the battle or the
enemy, was with very little effort put to a decisive defeat. Owing to
the proximity of the camp retreat was easy, and he had not much
difficulty in protecting his men from serious loss; hardly any were
killed in the actual battle, and only a few in the rear of the crowded
fugitives as they were rushing into their camp. As soon as it grew
dark they abandoned it for Privernum, trusting to stone walls for
protection rather than to the rampart round their camp.

The other consul, Plautius, after ravaging the fields in all
directions and carrying off the plunder, led his army into the
territory of Fundi. As he was crossing their frontier the senate of
Fundi met him and explained that they had not come to intercede for
Vitrubius and those who had belonged to his party, but for the people
of Fundi. They pointed out that Vitrubius himself had cleared them
from all responsibility by seeking shelter in Privernum and not in
Fundi, though it was his city. At Privernum, therefore, the enemies of
Rome were to be looked for and punished, for they had been faithless
both to Fundi and Rome. The men of Fundi wished for peace; their
sympathies were wholly Roman, and they retained a grateful sense of
the boon they received when the rights of citizenship were conferred
upon them. They besought the consul to abstain from making war upon an
unoffending people; their lands, their city, their own persons and the
persons of their wives and children were and would continue to be at
the disposal of Rome. The consul commended them for their loyalty and
sent despatches to Rome to inform the senate that the Fundans were
firm in their allegiance, after which he marched to Privernum.
Claudius gives a different account. According to him the consul first
proceeded against the ringleaders of the revolt, of whom three hundred
and fifty were sent in chains to Rome. He adds that the senate refused
to receive the surrender because they considered that the Fundans were
anxious to escape with the punishment of poor and obscure individuals.
" - Livy, History of Rome 8.19


ROMAN REPUBLICAN TERMS - CENSOR

The censor had several tasks that are, in our view, a strange mixture.
The first two censors served c.440 BC; they were to assist the consuls
by counting of the Roman citizens (census). This job had to be done
every five year and ended with the ritual cleansing of the state
(lustrum). In the fifth century, the censorship was still a typical
beginner's function.

The censors not only wrote down the names of the citizens, but also
registered their property and age; in this way, the quaestors were
able to estimate the budget and the consuls knew how many soldiers
they commanded. After the constitutional reforms of the 360's, it was
customary that the two censors served eighteen months; one of them had
to be a patrician, the other a plebeian.

From their financial task, other duties were derived. For example, the
censors had to put out to tender projects that were to be financed by
the state. In 310-309 BC, censor Appius Claudius was responsible for
an aqueduct and a road (the Aqua Appia and the Via Appia). A similar
task was the leasing out of conquered land (ager publicus). The first
project they had to put out to tender, however, was a lot smaller:
they had to find the farmer who was allowed to feed the holy geese on
the Capitol for the next five years.

From their classification of the population developed another duty:
they had to see who was worthy of the equestrian and senatorial rank,
a responsibility laid down in the fourth-century Lex Ovinia. This was
called the regimen morum, the control of the public moral. For
example, the censor Marcus Porcius Cato once expelled a man from the
Senate because he had kissed his wife in public, something that was
regarded as undignified behavior, unfitting for a member of this
august house. Because the regimen morum was a very important
responsibility, the censorship became increasingly a magistracy for
former consuls. The regimen morum also included controlling the books
of financial institutions and verifying and stamping measures and weights.

Sulla abolished the censorship; Pompey and Crassus reinstituted the
old magistracy again in 70, when 910,000 citizens were registered;
Caesar again abolished it when he became praefectus morum. His adopted
son Augustus restored the office, but made sure that the emperor was
always one of the two censors, one of his relatives being the second
one. At this age, the census was no longer taking place at regular
intervals; the empire had become too large.

The censors were elected by the Comitia centuriata, an assembly of the
people in which the richest Romans were in the majority. Censors had
no bodyguard (lictor) but were allowed to wear a purple-bordered toga.


PERSON OF THE DAY - TERMINUS

Terminus is the Roman deity protecting the boundaries between the
fields. Actually, the stone that marked the border was thought to be a
sacred object with divine powers. Each year, on February 23, the feast
of the Terminalia was held. At this ceremony people poured sacrificial
blood over the stone and placed wreaths of flowers to renew the powers
of the stone. Later, people began to regard the stone as a god.

The god Iuppiter, who also protected the borders as Iuppiter Terminus
or Terminalus, was closely connected with Terminus. Legend has it that
Terminus was the only god who did not give way to Iuppiter when he
moved into his temple on the Capitol. In this temple, a boundary stone
was worshipped as the stone of Terminus. It was also believed that a
curse was placed on anyone who would remove a boundary stone.


Valete bene!

Cato
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81803 From: Q. Fabius Maximus Date: 2010-11-07
Subject: Re: [Nova- Roma] Re: “Peak Civi lization” : The Fall of the R
The mistake ( hindsight being 20/20) was that Augustus used this disaster as a
eans to end ( for the most part) Roman expansion. They needed to put all of
hose on the dole (and fit) in the Army and make them earn their keep. Then they
hould have conquer Germany and not stopped until they reached the Urals. Hail
ome!!

alete,

i. Galerius Paulinus

Salvete et Salve Censore

Well it had to do with money. While the Dalmation/ Pannonian revolt was over, it had been very expensive, it took eleven eagles or one third of the Roman legionary manpower for the campaign in the Balkans.

Germania had three eagles assigned, Hispania 1, Greater Gaul 1, the rest were in the east watching the Parthians. The revolt was extremely shocking to the Romans once the
word got down to the man in the Street, the Po valley and Tuscany were especially worried about a Germanic invasion. Gaul in the mountains raised one legio of of Roman settlers, and mobliized its levy in case the Germans would come over the mountains. There was no way, Rome was in any danger. The Alliance with the Seubi was firm, and Arminius could not leave Germania with an enemy to the south even if he wanted to which he did not. So, he had to wait for the eventual Roman retaliation, which was not long coming.

Valete
Q. Fabius Maximus





[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81804 From: lathyrus77 Date: 2010-11-07
Subject: Re: Resignation from the Board of Directors
--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Susan" <metamorphosis2003@...> wrote:

> So Piscinus was removed from a list he is no longer qualified to be on..this is fair game.


Salve,

From what I gathered he wasn't removed from the list he was just moderated and prevented from speaking on the list.


Vale,

Anna Bucci
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81805 From: Susan Date: 2010-11-07
Subject: Re: Resignation from the Board of Directors
Salve Anna:

For the most part, I wasn't going so much by what any one else said, or gathered, but primarily what Piscinus wrote himself:

Quote:

I strongly protest the effort that has been made over the past several months to
exclude me from email lists used for corporate communications. This has been a
denial of my rights of membership and my privileges as a Director and former
Co-President.

[...]
End quote

If he is not actually 'off' the Senate list, then this is my misinterpretation, but I can only read what he wrote.

More to the point, Piscinus is not being denied any rights and privileges as he so claims, because he is no longer entitled to them, at least at the present time. Whether he is actually listed as a member wearing a gag, or excluded from the list altogether is, to me, splitting hairs. It is up to the Censor to decide how to administer the law here, as comitia leges are silent on this fine point of *exactly* how the censor should proceed in halting a Senator's activity on the Senate list.

Piscinus as a former Consul could have waited to pay his taxes next year and asked for reinstatement; at least I don't see where he could, after payment, be denied a Senate seat on the basis of tax arrears; but instead he chose to resign his seat over what he implies in a public forum as mistreatment. He is not being mistreated; its a legal consequence to failure on his part to uphold the law.

I've known Sabinus Censor for some time, and, although I haven't always agreed with him, I've always seen him as fairly straight shooting, law wise. If he wasn't, this wouldn't be an issue.

And, I know you do not like to see people disadvantaged; neither do I. That said, I don't wish to see you, Anna, or anyone else, labour under falsehoods.

Vale
Pompeia




--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "lathyrus77" <lathyrus77@...> wrote:
>
>
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Susan" <metamorphosis2003@> wrote:
>
> > So Piscinus was removed from a list he is no longer qualified to be on..this is fair game.
>
>
> Salve,
>
> From what I gathered he wasn't removed from the list he was just moderated and prevented from speaking on the list.
>
>
> Vale,
>
> Anna Bucci
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81806 From: Perusianus Date: 2010-11-07
Subject: Re: Sad development - Pompeii
--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Robert Woolwine <robert.woolwine@...> wrote:
>
> I am sure there are plenty of Nova Romans in the vicinity that would
> met up with you and show you places that are outside of the tourist areas.

Of course. Just write to me just before leaving to Rome or
when you are here in the Urbs; I'll try to arrange a meeting with other NRomans or just a quick "hello" somewhere.

vale
M IVL PERVSIANVS
Aedilis Urbis

> :)
>
> Respectfully,
>
> Sulla
>
> On Sat, Nov 6, 2010 at 10:07 PM, Leah Bernardo-Ciddio <lbciddio@...>wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > Salve,
> >
> > That sounds like a good idea! I love to write journals so I'll probably
> > bring a notebook in which I can write things down, even when I'm out and
> > about. I might even come across a good topic for a paper or a seminar while
> > I'm there!
> >
> > I was actually in Rome in 2006 - and yes, the camcorder really did come in
> > handy then! I decided I had to go back though - I was only there for four
> > days before we skipped off to Athens, and my love of Rome and Roman history
> > was only just budding, so I really could not appreciate it as much as I
> > will
> > now. Sixteen-year-old me was a lot less educated and therefore a lot less
> > awestruck!
> >
> > It certainly should be a good time. I'm a bit nervous as I'll be completely
> > alone, but I am really looking forward to the adventure.
> >
> > Vale,
> > Ocella
> >
> > On Sun, Nov 7, 2010 at 12:59 AM, Robert Woolwine
> > <robert.woolwine@... <robert.woolwine%40gmail.com>>wrote:
> >
> >
> > > Ave!
> > >
> > > OH sounds awesome!
> > >
> > > When I went on my one major major vacation I did AARs (After Action
> > > Reports)
> > > for each day. Every once in a while I go back to my blog to read them and
> > > its like I sort of relive the experience with all the details I tried to
> > > get
> > > in there. And, camcorder, if you have one and do any tours I cant stress
> > > the enjoyment enough. My boss also has given lots of tips, in case this
> > is
> > > your first trip overseas. If you might be interested. I am so jealous, I
> > > am sure you will have the time of your life!!!! :)
> > >
> > > Vale,
> > >
> > > Sulla
> > >
> > > On Sat, Nov 6, 2010 at 9:55 PM, Gnaea Livia Ocella <lbciddio@...<lbciddio%40gmail.com>
> > > >wrote:
> > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Salve,
> > > >
> > > > Yes, I'm escaping to Italy during my Winter Reading Week. Might not be
> > > the
> > > > best idea considering all the papers I'll have due the month after, but
> > > I'll
> > > > manage.
> > > >
> > > > I'll be in Rome mostly, but I plan to spend at least one day in
> > Pompeii.
> > > I
> > > > will definitely take a lot of photos - which reminds me that I need to
> > > start
> > > > hunting around for a new memory card thing (no idea what they're really
> > > > called) for my camera.
> > > >
> > > > Hopefully nothing else collapses within the next little while! These
> > > things
> > > > are becoming more and more frequent; if I remember correctly, a crane
> > > fell
> > > > into and knocked over the House of the Chaste Lovers last winter.
> > > >
> > > > Vale,
> > > > Ocella
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com <Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com><Nova-Roma%
> > 40yahoogroups.com>, Robert
> >
> > > > Woolwine <robert.woolwine@> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Ave,
> > > > >
> > > > > You are going in February? THAT IS SO COOL!!!! How long are you going
> > > to
> > > > > be there? PLEASE take tons of pics!
> > > > >
> > > > > Vale,
> > > > >
> > > > > Sulla
> > > > >
> > > > > On Sat, Nov 6, 2010 at 9:48 PM, Gnaea Livia Ocella <lbciddio@
> > > ...>wrote:
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Salvete,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Truly tragic. I've been moping around about it all day. Was looking
> > > > forward
> > > > > > to seeing that in February - now it's lost. Hopefully they can
> > > salvage
> > > > > > something from the rubble.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Valete,
> > > > > > Ocella
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com <Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com><Nova-Roma%
> > 40yahoogroups.com
> > > ><Nova-Roma%
> > > > 40yahoogroups.com>, Publius
> > > >
> > > > > > Ullerius Stephanus Venator <famila.ulleria.venii@> wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Salvete omnes;
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > The so-called "House of the Gladiators" has collapsed:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20101106/ap_on_re_eu/eu_italy_pompeii_collapse
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > In amicitia et fide
> > > > > > > P Ullerius Stephanus Venator
> > > > > > > Civis et Poeta
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Sodalitas Coquuorum et Cerevisiae Coctorum
> > > > > > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Sodalis_Coq_et_Coq/
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > (sites subject to occasional updates)
> > > > > > > http://www.facebook.com/p.ullerius.stfnus.venator
> > > > > > > http://nrfb.korsoft.com/
> > > > > > > http://www.catamount-grange-hearth.org/
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > ------------------------------------
> > >
> > > Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81807 From: Ass.Pomerium Date: 2010-11-07
Subject: I: Signa Romanorum (nuovo aggiornamento/new update)
p.c.



_____

Da: noreply+feedproxy@... [mailto:noreply+feedproxy@...] Per
conto di Signa Romanorum
Inviato: sabato 6 novembre 2010 11.25
A: milko.anselmi@...
Oggetto: Signa Romanorum (nuovo aggiornamento/new update)





<http://www.signaromanorum.org> Signa Romanorum (nuovo aggiornamento/new
update)

<http://fusion.google.com/add?source=atgs&feedurl=http://feeds.feedburner.co
m/signaromanorum>



_____



<http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/signaromanorum/~3/FWOC71Jfdf0/7718?utm_sourc
e=feedburner&utm_medium=email> NUSRCOL032 - Colonnato di Baal a Palmyra /
Palmyra Baal's courtyard

Posted: 05 Nov 2010 07:48 AM PDT

<http://www.signaromanorum.org/jpg/COL_Palmyra_ViaColonnata.jpg>

secolo/century: I d.C. - I A.D.
luogo/place: area archeologica di Tadmur, Siria/ archaelogical area of
Tadmur, Siria
info: <http://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Palmira>
http://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Palmira


<http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/signaromanorum/~4/FWOC71Jfdf0?utm_source=fee
dburner&utm_medium=email>




You are subscribed to email updates from Signa
<http://www.signaromanorum.org> Romanorum
To stop receiving these emails, you may unsubscribe
<http://feedburner.google.com/fb/a/mailunsubscribe?k=NMNP8arccjrwlrJVvOp0NYD
ygrM> now.

Email delivery powered by Google


Google Inc., 20 West Kinzie, Chicago IL USA 60610





[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81808 From: Cato Date: 2010-11-08
Subject: a.d. VI Id. Nov.
Cato omnibus in foro SPD

Hodiernus dies est ante diem VI Idus Novembris; haec dies comitialis est.


"Whilst Privernum was invested by two consular armies, one of the
consuls was recalled home to conduct the elections. It was in this
year that the carceres were erected in the Circus Maximus. The trouble
of the war with Privernum was not yet over when a most alarming report
of a sudden movement amongst the Gauls reached the senate. Such
reports were not often treated lightly. The new consuls, L. Aemilius
Mamercinus and C Plautius, were immediately ordered to arrange their
respective commands on the very day they assumed office, namely July
1. The Gaulish war fell to Mamercinus, and he allowed none of those
who were called up for service to claim exemption. It is even asserted
that the mob of mechanics and artizans, a class utterly unfit for
warfare, were called out. An immense army was concentrated at Veii to
check the advance of the Gauls. It was thought better not to march any
further in case the enemy took some other route to the City. After a
thorough reconnaissance had been made, it was ascertained after a few
days that all was quiet as far as the Gauls were concerned, and the
whole force was thereupon marched to Privernum. From this point there
is a twofold story. Some state that the city was stormed and Vitrubius
taken alive; other authorities aver that before the final assault the
townsmen came out with a caduceus and surrendered to the consul,
whilst Vitrubius was given up by his own men. The senate, when
consulted as to the fate of Vitrubius and the Privernates, instructed
the consul to demolish the walls of Privernum and station a strong
garrison there, and then to celebrate his triumph. Vitrubius was to be
kept in prison until the consul returned and then to be scourged and
beheaded; his house on the Palatine was to be razed and his goods
devoted to Semo Sancus. The money realised by their sale was melted
down into brazen orbs which were deposited in the chapel of Sancus
opposite the temple of Quirinus. With regard to the senate of
Privernum, it was decreed that every senator who had remained in that
city after its revolt from Rome should be deported beyond the Tiber on
the same conditions as those of Velitrae. After his triumph, when
Vitrubius and his accomplices had been put to death, the consul
thought that as the senate was satisfied with the punishment of the
guilty, he might safely refer to the matter of the Privernates. He
addressed the House in the following terms: "Since the authors of the
revolt, senators, have been visited by the immortal gods and by you
with the punishment they deserved, what is your pleasure with regard
to the innocent population? Although it is my duty to ask for opinions
rather than to give them, I should like to say that in view of the
fact that the Privernates are neighbours of the Samnites, with whom
peaceful relations are now upon a most uncertain footing, I am anxious
that as few grounds of complaint as possible should exist between us
and them."

The question was not an easy one to settle, for the senators, were
governed largely by their temperaments and some advised a harsh,
others a gentler course. The general divergence of opinion was widened
by one of the Privernate envoys who was thinking more of the state of
things in which he had been born than of his present plight. One of
the senators who was advocating sterner measures asked him what
punishment he thought his countrymen deserved. He replied: "The
punishment which those deserve who assert their liberty." The consul
saw that this spirited reply only exasperated those who were already
adverse to the cause of the Privernates, and he tried to get a softer
answer by a more considerate question. "Well," he said, "if we spare
you now, what sort of a peace may we hope to have with you for the
time to come?" "A real and lasting one," was the reply, "if its terms
be good, but if they are bad, one that will soon be broken." On
hearing this, some of the senators exclaimed that he was using open
threats, and that it was by such language that even those states which
had been pacified were incited to renew hostilities. The better part
of the senate, however, put a more favourable construction on his
reply, and declared that it was an utterance worthy of a man and a man
who loved liberty. Was it, they asked, to be supposed that any people
or for that matter, any individual would remain longer than he could
help under conditions which made him discontented? Peace would only be
faithfully kept where those who accepted it did so voluntarily; they
could not hope that it would be faithfully kept where they sought to
reduce men to servitude. The senate was brought to adopt this view
mainly by the consul himself who kept repeating to the consulars-the
men who had to state their opinions first-in a tone loud enough for
many to hear, "Men whose first and last thought is their liberty
deserve to become Romans." Thus they gained their cause in the senate,
and the proposal to confer full citizenship on the Privernates was
submitted to the people." - Livy, History of Rome 8.20



Today is the last celebration of the Mania, and the rite of mundus was
performed for the final time of the year. In this ceremony an effigy
representing the sky was placed upside down in a pit and and covered
with a large stone called the lapis manalis. Three times a year,
including today, the stone was removed to alow the spirits of the
underworld access to the upper regions of the earth. Mania is the
goddess of the dead and along with Mantus rules the underworld. She is
said to be the mother of ghosts, the undead and other spirits of the
night, as well as the Lares and the Manes, the spirits of Roman
ancestors. Mania was borrowed from the Etruscan goddess Manea after
the assimilation of the Etruscan people by the Romans, and from the
Greeks as the goddess of madness and death --- with her sister
Insania, utter madness, she was a cruel mistress.



"Illustrious Rhea ... Mother of Gods and Men, who from Gaia (Earth)
and spacious Ouranos (Heaven) derives her glorious birth." –Orphic
Hymn 14 to Rhea

"Ops is said to be the wife of Saturn. By her they designated the
earth, because the earth distributes all goods to the human gender." -
Festus 203:19

Today is also sacred to Ops, or the Greek Rhea. Ops is the goddess of
harvests. She was the wife of Saturn, by whom she bore Iuppiter and
Iuno. At her festivals, the Opiconsivia and the Opalia, held in August
and December, respectively, she was worshiped as a goddess of sowing
and reaping and was associated with Consus, god of crops. She was
later identified with the Greek Rhea. The Latin word ops means
"riches, goods, abundance, gifts, munificence, plenty". This word is
also related to opus, meaning "work" and, particularly "working the
earth, ploughing, sowing". Ops was the goddess of plenty among the
Latins (Romans). She was the spouse of Saturn, the bountiful monarch
of the Golden Age. Just as Saturn was identified to Kronos, his Greek
counterpart, Ops was identified to Rhea, the wife of Kronos (or
Kronus, in the Latin spelling). The cult of Ops was instituted by King
Titus Tatius, the Sabine monarch. And Ops soon became the patroness of
riches, abundance, and prosperity both personal and national. She is
shown seated, holding sheaves of grain.

In Greek mythology, Rhea was the mother of the gods, daughter of
Uranus and Gaia. She was married to her brother Cronus and was the
mother of Demeter, Hades, Hera, Hestia, Poseidon and Zeus. Cronus was
jealous of the future power of his children and, to secure his
dominion, he ate his own children. Rhea managed to rescue one son,
Zeus. She hid him in the Dictean Cave in Crete and gave Cronus a stone
wrapped in the clothes of the infant, which he swallowed. Thus Rhea
succeeded in making him believe that he had killed all of his
children. When Zeus reached maturity he overpowered and dethroned his
father and made Cronus disgorge his siblings. Rhea is identified with
mother goddess Cybele from Asia Minor and is also known as Rhea Cybele
and Magna Mater ("great mother"). She was worshipped with orgiastic
rites. Rhea is depicted between two lions or on a chariot pulled by lions.



Valete bene!

Cato
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81809 From: M•IVL•SEVERVS Date: 2010-11-08
Subject: Re: Notice of Moderation
Ave Graecus,

You and your group are a shame to Nova Roma. You are destroying our Res publica.
Those who would make jokes about sexual harassment, are as guilty as the
harassers themselves.
Baseles accusations againts Dexter? Come on, Graecus, you should know better,
but you prefer to protect your pals.
Are you going to allow this, Consul P. Memmius Albucius?
You have my full support in this matter, dear Anna, as well as Maior.
Graecus and his group, including Sulla, of course, are the minions that are
killing Nova Roma! (I am not referring to you by this, Albucius. Not yet).

Vale,
 
M•IVL•SEVERVS

SENATOR
PRO•CONSVL•PROVINCIÆ•MEXICI




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81811 From: Publius Memmius Albucius Date: 2010-11-08
Subject: Re: Notice of Moderation
Salve dear Proconsul,

I must tell you that I feel a bit "disconnected", for currently in our Senate, in session.

I am not sure, but if you refer to a moderation, I suppose that you address to the Graecus-quaestor, and not the Graecus-pontifex.

Please send me the reference of the action, message, etc. which is the cause of your indignation, Proconsul and please, if I may correct an illegal or inappropriate act, give more elements. If you intervene on behalf on a citizen pls just inform me if this person is a citizen or not, and if he/she has asked yet my intermission. I see that you are evoking Ana and Maior, and cc.'ing to Ana... (?).

I stay at your disposal, dear Severe.

Vale sincerely,


Albucius cos.




Date: Mon, 8 Nov 2010 10:28:34 -0800
From: marcusiuliusseverus@...
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Notice of Moderation
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com; lathyrus77@...; praetores@yahoogroups.com
CC: albucius_aoe@...; Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com







Ave Graecus,

You and your group are a shame to Nova Roma. You are destroying our Res publica.
Those who would make jokes about sexual harassment, are as guilty as the harassers themselves.
Baseles accusations againts Dexter? Come on, Graecus, you should know better, but you prefer to protect your pals.
Are you going to allow this, Consul P. Memmius Albucius?
You have my full support in this matter, dear Anna, as well as Maior.
Graecus and his group, including Sulla, of course, are the minions that are killing Nova Roma! (I am not referring to you by this, Albucius. Not yet).

Vale,

M�IVL�SEVERVS

SENATOR
PRO�CONSVL�PROVINCI��MEXICI


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81812 From: petronius_dexter Date: 2010-11-08
Subject: Re: Notice of Moderation
C. Petronius M. Iulio Severo sal.,

> Baseles accusations againts Dexter?

Yes, absolutely baseless. Did you read the private message I sent to Maior about the waves of confarreationes performed by Maior in New York city?

That was the private joke.

Can you explain how this joke is:
- 1) harassment.
- 2) sexual.

Optime vale.

C. Petronius Dexter
Arcoiali scribebat
A. d. VI Idus Novembres P. Memmio K. Fabio II coss.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81813 From: Robert Date: 2010-11-08
Subject: Re: Notice of Moderation
Ave,

The correct phrase would be preventing your faction from doing any more damage and coups to nr. And, it is also understandable the feelings you have given the unmitigated disaster your consulship was! Maybe if you and compy were a bit better piscinus and crew wouldn't have needed to stage the coup?

Vale

Sulla

Sent from my iPhone

On Nov 8, 2010, at 11:28 AM, M•IVL•SEVERVS <marcusiuliusseverus@...> wrote:

> Ave Graecus,
>
> You and your group are a shame to Nova Roma. You are destroying our Res publica.
> Those who would make jokes about sexual harassment, are as guilty as the
> harassers themselves.
> Baseles accusations againts Dexter? Come on, Graecus, you should know better,
> but you prefer to protect your pals.
> Are you going to allow this, Consul P. Memmius Albucius?
> You have my full support in this matter, dear Anna, as well as Maior.
> Graecus and his group, including Sulla, of course, are the minions that are
> killing Nova Roma! (I am not referring to you by this, Albucius. Not yet).
>
> Vale,
>
> M•IVL•SEVERVS
>
> SENATOR
> PRO•CONSVL•PROVINCIÆ•MEXICI
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81814 From: Q. Fabius Maximus Date: 2010-11-08
Subject: Re: Notice of Moderation
Save Consule et Salvete

You and your group are a shame to Nova Roma. You are destroying our Respublica.
Those who would make jokes about sexual harassment, are as guilty as the
harassers themselves.



Our group (Vedius, Cassius, Cornelius Sulla, Equitius Cinncinatius, Iunius Palladus, Fabius Maximus, Octavius) as you call it, MADE Nova Roma. So calling us destroyers makes no sense at all.
There was no reports of Sexual harassment until 2000, when certain people joined NR only to leave a year latter. Then as these people rejoined Nova Roma in the mid 2000s it started up again, these accusations. What does that tell us? That this is a hot button issue used to obscure the real issues like gay marriage was used in the 2008 US elections, to polarize the people so they ignore the real problems. It is a time honored political tactic.

Valethe...
Q Fabius Maximus



MARKETPLACE

Hobbies & Activities Zone: Find others who share your passions! Explore new interests.


Get great advice about dogs and cats. Visit the Dog & Cat Answers Center.


Stay on top of your group activity without leaving the page you're on - Get the Yahoo! Toolbar now.



Switch to: Text-Only, Daily Digest • Unsubscribe • Terms of Use



.






[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81815 From: Cato Date: 2010-11-08
Subject: Re: Notice of Moderation
Cato Severo sal.

This is my favorite part:

"Graecus and his group, including Sulla, of course..."

LOL

Of course Sulla is behind it. Like the communists of the 50s. Or the Illuminati. Or the Templars...of course.

Vale,

Cato

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, M•IVL•SEVERVS <marcusiuliusseverus@...> wrote:
>
> Ave Graecus,
>
> You and your group are a shame to Nova Roma. You are destroying our Res publica.
> Those who would make jokes about sexual harassment, are as guilty as the
> harassers themselves.
> Baseles accusations againts Dexter? Come on, Graecus, you should know better,
> but you prefer to protect your pals.
> Are you going to allow this, Consul P. Memmius Albucius?
> You have my full support in this matter, dear Anna, as well as Maior.
> Graecus and his group, including Sulla, of course, are the minions that are
> killing Nova Roma! (I am not referring to you by this, Albucius. Not yet).
>
> Vale,
>  
> M•IVL•SEVERVS
>
> SENATOR
> PRO•CONSVL•PROVINCIÆ•MEXICI
>
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81816 From: luciaiuliaaquila Date: 2010-11-08
Subject: Nov 2010 Senate Session
Iulia omnibus in foro S.P.D.

These are very trying times in Nova Roma, and in light of this, I am asking if we, the citizens, could have a summary of what is going on in the Senate.

Bearing in mind that we all have endured dueling Consuls and a proposed, albeit unsuccessful, Dictatorship; a very rough year in which many have lost faith in the Res publica, in Her Magistrates and for some of us, those we call friends. On all "sides" and on all "sides" the flames were fanned as some of those from all "sides" showed their worst...side.

It would be a sign of respect to keep the citizens apprised of important developments.
To follow the example of the New Collegium Pontificum regarding transparency would be an honorable act for the Senate to emulate.

There are many things that need to be fixed in Nova Roma and we have many good minds who can offer some advice, their point of view, after all it is not just the Senate, but the Senate and People of Rome.

I volunteered to help with the new bylaws but Nova Roma may even have to amend the constitution (which should at best be another lex in my opinion) because, for example, any mention of Dictatorship is illegal under Maine Law. Further, we, collectively, may have to comb through any laws that were passed during any past dictatorship for compliance and also for illegalities. Any Dictator-like behavior is suspect as well.

Just beginning to lift Nova Roma from her weakened state will take all the resources we have. This is not the time to exclude the people, the citizens.

Simul Triumphamus, valete optime,

L. Iulia Aquila
Aedilis Curulis

Securum in tenebris me facit esse Venus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81817 From: iulius sabinus Date: 2010-11-08
Subject: Re: Nov 2010 Senate Session
SALVE IULIA ET SALVETE!
 
A small correction: there is not a new CP but a new CP list. The another one was restricted because the reasons I do not repeat and it was necessary to set a new one as the CP to continue the work.
All pontifices and flamines were invited to the new CP list. All joined but three. Open to the public, the CP list is secured now and nobody can take it over. Our citizens can observe what is happen there so in the future there will be no doubts about how the CP works, having as priority the NR general interest.

 
VALETE,
Sabinus

"Every individual is the architect of his own fortune" - Appius Claudius

--- On Tue, 11/9/10, luciaiuliaaquila <luciaiuliaaquila@...> wrote:


From: luciaiuliaaquila <luciaiuliaaquila@...>
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Nov 2010 Senate Session
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Date: Tuesday, November 9, 2010, 4:55 AM


 



Iulia omnibus in foro S.P.D.

These are very trying times in Nova Roma, and in light of this, I am asking if we, the citizens, could have a summary of what is going on in the Senate.

Bearing in mind that we all have endured dueling Consuls and a proposed, albeit unsuccessful, Dictatorship; a very rough year in which many have lost faith in the Res publica, in Her Magistrates and for some of us, those we call friends. On all "sides" and on all "sides" the flames were fanned as some of those from all "sides" showed their worst...side.

It would be a sign of respect to keep the citizens apprised of important developments.
To follow the example of the New Collegium Pontificum regarding transparency would be an honorable act for the Senate to emulate.

There are many things that need to be fixed in Nova Roma and we have many good minds who can offer some advice, their point of view, after all it is not just the Senate, but the Senate and People of Rome.

I volunteered to help with the new bylaws but Nova Roma may even have to amend the constitution (which should at best be another lex in my opinion) because, for example, any mention of Dictatorship is illegal under Maine Law. Further, we, collectively, may have to comb through any laws that were passed during any past dictatorship for compliance and also for illegalities. Any Dictator-like behavior is suspect as well.

Just beginning to lift Nova Roma from her weakened state will take all the resources we have. This is not the time to exclude the people, the citizens.

Simul Triumphamus, valete optime,

L. Iulia Aquila
Aedilis Curulis

Securum in tenebris me facit esse Venus











[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81818 From: Timothy or Stephen Gallagher Date: 2010-11-08
Subject: Re: Notice of Moderation
Salve Cato,

So let me see if I have this right. Sulla was temporary an illustrious communist in the 1950�s?

Vale

Paulinus




To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
From: catoinnyc@...
Date: Tue, 9 Nov 2010 00:33:51 +0000
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Notice of Moderation






Cato Severo sal.

This is my favorite part:

"Graecus and his group, including Sulla, of course..."

LOL

Of course Sulla is behind it. Like the communists of the 50s. Or the Illuminati. Or the Templars...of course.

Vale,

Cato

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, M���IVL���SEVERVS <marcusiuliusseverus@...> wrote:
>
> Ave Graecus,
>
> You and your group are a shame to Nova Roma. You are destroying our Res publica.
> Those who would make� jokes about sexual harassment, are as guilty as the
> harassers themselves.
> Baseles accusations againts Dexter? Come on, Graecus, you should know better,
> but� you prefer� to protect your pals.
> Are you going to allow this, Consul P. Memmius Albucius?
> You have my full support in this matter, dear Anna, as well as Maior.
> Graecus and his group, including Sulla, of course, are the minions that are
> killing Nova Roma! (I am not referring to you by this, Albucius. Not yet).
>
> Vale,
> �
> M���IVL���SEVERVS
>
> SENATOR
> PRO���CONSVL���PROVINCI�����MEXICI
>
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>





[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81819 From: Diana Octavia Date: 2010-11-09
Subject: Re: Resignation from the Board of Directors
>> The current meeting of the Board of Directors must consider a motion to
>> expel Robert Woolwine, Stephen Phenow, and any others who engaged in
>> sexual
>> harassment of female members of the Board.

I laughed out loud when I read this one! I've never met Sulla, but I've
known him through NR since 1998 or 1999. And Fabius is a true gentlemen. Any
woman who meets/met him can verify that.

Vale,
Diana
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81820 From: Diana Octavia Date: 2010-11-09
Subject: Re: Sad development - Pompeii
Oh no! And I was just there a few weeks ago!

----- Original Message -----
From: "Publius Ullerius Stephanus Venator" <famila.ulleria.venii@...>
To: "NR-Main List" <Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Sunday, November 07, 2010 1:22 AM
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Sad development - Pompeii


> Salvete omnes;
>
> The so-called "House of the Gladiators" has collapsed:
>
> http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20101106/ap_on_re_eu/eu_italy_pompeii_collapse
>
> --
> In amicitia et fide
> P Ullerius Stephanus Venator
> Civis et Poeta
>
> Sodalitas Coquuorum et Cerevisiae Coctorum
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Sodalis_Coq_et_Coq/
>
> (sites subject to occasional updates)
> http://www.facebook.com/p.ullerius.stfnus.venator
> http://nrfb.korsoft.com/
> http://www.catamount-grange-hearth.org/
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81821 From: Gnaeus Iulius Caesar Date: 2010-11-09
Subject: Re: Resignation from the Board of Directors
You got a honourable mention in his ranting post as well Diana. I think you were included in the list of evil plotters on the Back Alley seeking to undermine the morals of NR and overthrow the religio piscina.

Caesar

--- On Mon, 11/8/10, Diana Octavia <roman.babe@...> wrote:

> From: Diana Octavia <roman.babe@...>
> Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Resignation from the Board of Directors
> To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> Date: Monday, November 8, 2010, 11:37 PM
> >> The current meeting of the
> Board of Directors must consider a motion to
> >> expel Robert Woolwine, Stephen Phenow, and any
> others who engaged in
> >> sexual
> >> harassment of female members of the Board.
>
> I laughed out loud when I read this one! I've never met
> Sulla, but I've
> known him through NR since 1998 or 1999. And Fabius is a
> true gentlemen. Any
> woman who meets/met him can verify that.
>
> Vale,
> Diana
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>     Nova-Roma-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com
>
>
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81822 From: lathyrus77 Date: 2010-11-09
Subject: Re: Notice of Moderation
--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Q. Fabius Maximus" <QFabiusMaxmi@...> wrote:
>
>
> Our group (Vedius, Cassius, Cornelius Sulla, Equitius Cinncinatius, Iunius Palladus, Fabius Maximus, Octavius) as you call it, MADE Nova Roma.


Salve,


I wouldn't include Palladius in your group. At least not the group he's referring to.


Vale,

Anna Bucci
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81823 From: Cato Date: 2010-11-09
Subject: a.d. IV Id. Nov.
Cato omnibus in foro SPD

Hodiernus dies est ante diem V Idus Novembris; haec dies comitialis est.


"Both consuls sent word to the senate that there were very slender
hopes of the Samnites remaining at peace. Publilius informed them that
2000 troops from Nola and 4000 Samnites had been admitted into
Palaeopolis, more under pressure from Nola than from any great desire
for their presence on the part of the Greeks; Cornelius sent the
additional information that orders for a general levy had been issued
throughout Samnium, and attempts were being openly made to induce the
neighbouring communities of Privernum, Fundi, and Formiae to rise.
Under these circumstances it was decided to send ambassadors to the
Samnites before actually commencing war. The Samnites sent an insolent
reply. They accused the Romans of wanton aggression, and absolutely
denied the charges made against themselves; they declared that the
assistance which the Greeks had received was not furnished by their
government, nor had they tampered with Fundi and Formiae, for they had
no reason to distrust their own strength if it came to war. Moreover,
it was impossible to disguise the deep irritation which the Samnite
nation felt at the conduct of the Roman people in restoring Fregellae
after they had taken it from the Volscians and destroyed it, and
placing a colony on Samnite territory which the colonists called
Fregellae. If this insult and injury were not removed by those
responsible for it, they would themselves exert all their strength to
get rid of it. The Roman ambassadors invited them to submit the
questions at issue to arbitration before their common friends, but the
Samnites replied: "Why should we beat about the bush? No diplomacy, no
arbitration can adjust our quarrel; arms and the fortune of war can
alone decide the issue. We must meet in Campania." To which the Roman
replied: "Roman soldiers will march not whither the enemy summons
them, but whither their commander leads them."

Publilius meantime had taken up a suitable position between
Palaeopolis and Neapolis in order to prevent them from rendering each
other the mutual assistance they had hitherto given. The time for the
elections was close at hand, and it would have been most inexpedient
for the public interest to recall Publilius, as he was ready to attack
the place and in daily expectation of effecting its capture. An
arrangement was accordingly made with the tribunes of the plebs to
propose to the people that at the expiration of his term of office
Publilius should continue to act as proconsul till the war with the
Greeks was brought to a close. The same step was taken with regard to
Cornelius, who had already entered Samnium, and written instructions
were sent to him to nominate a Dictator to hold the elections. He
nominated M. Claudius Marcellus, and Sp. Postumius was named by him
Master of the Horse. The elections, however, were not held by that
Dictator, doubts having been raised as to whether the proper
formalities had been observed in his nomination. The augurs, when
consulted, declared that they had not been duly observed. The tribunes
characterised their action as dishonest and iniquitous. "How," they
asked, "could they know that there was any irregularity? The consul
rose at midnight to nominate the Dictator; he had made no
communication to any one either officially or privately about the
matter; there was no one living who could say that he had seen or
heard anything which would vitiate the auspices; the augurs sitting
quietly in Rome could not possibly divine what difficulty the consul
may have met with in the camp. Who was there who could not see that
the irregularity which the augurs had discovered lay in the fact that
the Dictator was a plebeian?" These and other objections were raised
by the tribunes. Matters, however, reverted to an interregnum, and
owing to the repeated adjournment of the elections on one pretext
after another, there were no fewer than fourteen interregna. At last
L. Aemilius, the fourteenth interrex, declared C. Poetilius and L.
Papirius Mugilanus duly elected." - Livy, History of Rome 8.23



Today is Sadie Hawkins' Day. In A.D. 1288 the Scottish parliament
legislated that any woman could propose to a man in Leap Year. If
refused, the man had to compensate her by one pound. This law was
adopted in France, Switzerland and Italy, and the tradition was
carried to America, Australia and other countries. In the United
States, the idea made its debut in Al Capp's "Li'l Abner" comic strip
on November 15, 1937. Sadie Hawkins was "the homeliest gal in the
hills" who grew tired of waiting for the fellows to come a courtin'.
Her father, Hekzebiah Hawkins, a prominent resident of Dogpatch, was
even more worried about Sadie living at home for the rest of his life,
so he decreed the first annual Sadie Hawkins Day, a foot race in which
the unmarried gals pursued the town's bachelors, with matrimony the
consequence. By the late 1930's the event had swept the nation and had
a life of its own. Life magazine reported over 200 colleges holding
Sadie Hawkins Day events in 1939, only two years after its inception.
It became a woman empowering rite at high schools and college
campuses, long before the modern feminist movement gained prominence.
The basis of Sadie Hawkins Day is that women and girls take the
initiative in inviting the man or boy of their choice out on a date,
typically to a dance attended by other bachelors and their aggressive
dates. When Al Capp created the event, it was not his intention to
have the event occur annually on a specific date because it inhibited
his freewheeling plotting. However, due to its enormous popularity and
the numerous fan letters Capp received, the event became an annual
event in the strip during the month of November, lasting four decades.



"Originally the Lord Mayor of London was elected on the feast of St
Simon and St Jude (28 October), and although the election day was
altered, admittance to office continued to take place on that day
until 1751. From 1752, owing to the adoption of the Gregorian
calendar, Lord Mayor's Day became 9 November. In recent years the Lord
Mayor has been sworn in at Guildhall on the second Friday [now
Saturday] in November, being presented to the Lord Chief Justice on
the following day (Saturday)." - Brewer's Dictionary of Phrase and
Fable (Cassell, London, 1988)


Images of Gog and Magog depicted as giants are carried in a
traditional procession in the Lord Mayor's Show by the Lord Mayor of
the City of London. According to the Lord Mayor, the giants Gog and
Magog are traditional guardians of the City of London, and their
images have been carried in the Lord Mayor's Show since the days of
King Henry V. The Lord Mayor's account of Gog and Magog says that the
Roman Emperor Diocletian had thirty-three wicked daughters. He found
thirty three husbands for them to curb their wicked ways; they chafed
at this, and under the leadership of the eldest sister, Alba, they
murdered them. For this crime, they were set adrift at sea; they were
washed ashore on a windswept island, which after Alba was called
Albion. Here they coupled with demons, and gave birth to a race of
giants, among whose descendants were Gog and Magog.


Valete bene!

Cato
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81824 From: Publius Memmius Albucius Date: 2010-11-09
Subject: The senate/board is called to another session in November
Senators, Magistrates, Ministers, and all Citizens of Nova Roma,


The current session of the Senate/Board of Nova Roma (inc.) will soon end.

However, several points still need a decision or information of the senators (directors) of our Republic.

I therefore inform you, hereby, of my intent calling the Senate for another session, after the end of the current one.


Valete omnes,


Albucius cos.





[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81825 From: luciaiuliaaquila Date: 2010-11-09
Subject: Re: Nov 2010 Senate Session
Ave Sabine, avete omnes,

Thank you for that small correction, that is exactly what I meant: the new CP list. I apologize for any misunderstanding this may have caused.
Thank you also for the update on the membership of the list which can be found here for observation to non-members of the CP:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/collegium_pontificum_nr/

Vale, et valete,

Julia


--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, iulius sabinus <iulius_sabinus@...> wrote:
>
> SALVE IULIA ET SALVETE!
>  
> A small correction: there is not a new CP but a new CP list. The another one was restricted because the reasons I do not repeat and it was necessary to set a new one as the CP to continue the work.
> All pontifices and flamines were invited to the new CP list. All joined but three. Open to the public, the CP list is secured now and nobody can take it over. Our citizens can observe what is happen there so in the future there will be no doubts about how the CP works, having as priority the NR general interest.
>
>  
> VALETE,
> Sabinus
>
> "Every individual is the architect of his own fortune" - Appius Claudius
>
> --- On Tue, 11/9/10, luciaiuliaaquila <luciaiuliaaquila@...> wrote:
>
>
> From: luciaiuliaaquila <luciaiuliaaquila@...>
> Subject: [Nova-Roma] Nov 2010 Senate Session
> To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> Date: Tuesday, November 9, 2010, 4:55 AM
>
>
>  
>
>
>
> Iulia omnibus in foro S.P.D.
>
> These are very trying times in Nova Roma, and in light of this, I am asking if we, the citizens, could have a summary of what is going on in the Senate.
>
> Bearing in mind that we all have endured dueling Consuls and a proposed, albeit unsuccessful, Dictatorship; a very rough year in which many have lost faith in the Res publica, in Her Magistrates and for some of us, those we call friends. On all "sides" and on all "sides" the flames were fanned as some of those from all "sides" showed their worst...side.
>
> It would be a sign of respect to keep the citizens apprised of important developments.
> To follow the example of the New Collegium Pontificum regarding transparency would be an honorable act for the Senate to emulate.
>
> There are many things that need to be fixed in Nova Roma and we have many good minds who can offer some advice, their point of view, after all it is not just the Senate, but the Senate and People of Rome.
>
> I volunteered to help with the new bylaws but Nova Roma may even have to amend the constitution (which should at best be another lex in my opinion) because, for example, any mention of Dictatorship is illegal under Maine Law. Further, we, collectively, may have to comb through any laws that were passed during any past dictatorship for compliance and also for illegalities. Any Dictator-like behavior is suspect as well.
>
> Just beginning to lift Nova Roma from her weakened state will take all the resources we have. This is not the time to exclude the people, the citizens.
>
> Simul Triumphamus, valete optime,
>
> L. Iulia Aquila
> Aedilis Curulis
>
> Securum in tenebris me facit esse Venus
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81826 From: william Date: 2010-11-09
Subject: import info
I am still listed at
http://www.novaroma.org/nr/Provincia_America_Boreoccidentalis_-_Praetorium_%28Nova_Roma%29

as

Legata pro praetore

Marcus Cornelius Felix

i am getting email from people in the pov wanting to talk with/ join etc
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81827 From: iulius sabinus Date: 2010-11-09
Subject: Re: import info
SALVE CORNELI FELIX!
 
Pages were updated. Thanks.
 
VALE,
Sabinus

"Every individual is the architect of his own fortune" - Appius Claudius

--- On Tue, 11/9/10, william <magewuffa@...> wrote:


From: william <magewuffa@...>
Subject: [Nova-Roma] import info
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Date: Tuesday, November 9, 2010, 8:42 PM


 



I am still listed at
http://www.novaroma.org/nr/Provincia_America_Boreoccidentalis_-_Praetorium_%28Nova_Roma%29

as

Legata pro praetore

Marcus Cornelius Felix

i am getting email from people in the pov wanting to talk with/ join etc











[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81828 From: QFabiusMaxmi@aol.com Date: 2010-11-09
Subject: Re: Notice of Moderation
In a message dated 11/9/2010 12:53:31 A.M. Pacific Standard Time,
lathyrus77@... writes:

I wouldn't include Palladius in your group. At least not the group he's
referring to.

===
Anna you are like a tarnished brass ase. Always turning up when you least
expect it.

To not include D. Iunius Palladius Censor and Consul in any discussion of
the original organizers of Nova Roma is insulting to that person and his
endeavors.

We are all and always have been about Nova Roma first. We are not
"chosen" to save anything, and deflection from the attempted coup by other issues
fails to change that.

Q. Fabius Maximus




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81829 From: Cato Date: 2010-11-10
Subject: a.d. IV Id. Nov.
Cato omnibus in foro SPD

Hodiernus dies est ante diem IV Idus Novembris; haec dies comitialis est.


"The foundation of Alexandria in Egypt is stated to have taken place
this year [327 B.C.], and also the assassination of Alexander of
Epirus at the hands of a Lucanian refugee, an event which fulfilled
the oracular prediction of the Dodonean Jupiter. When he was invited
by the Tarentines into Italy, he received a warning to beware of the
water of Acheron and the city of Pandosia; for it was there that the
limits of his destiny were fixed. This made him cross over into Italy
all the sooner, that he might be as far as possible from the city of
Pandosia in Epirus and the river Acheron, which flows from Molossis
into the Infernal Marshes and finally empties itself into the
Thesprotian Gulf. But, as often happens, in trying to avoid his fate
he rushed upon it. He won many victories over the nationalities of
Southern Italy, inflicting numerous defeats upon the legions of
Bruttium and Lucania, capturing the city of Heraclea, a colony of
settlers from Tarentum, taking Potentia from the Lucanians, Sipontum
from the Apulians, Consentia and Terina from the Bruttii and other
cities belonging to the Messapians and Lucanians. He sent three
hundred noble families to Epirus to be detained there as hostages. The
circumstances under which he met his death were these. He had taken up
a permanent position on three hills not far from the city of Pandosia
which is close to the frontiers of the Lucanians and Bruttii. From
this point he made incursions into every part of the enemy's
territory, and on these expeditions he had as a bodyguard some two
hundred Lucanian refugees, in whose fidelity he placed confidence, but
who, like most of their countrymen, were given to changing their minds
as their fortunes changed. Continuous rains had inundated the whole
country and prevented the three divisions of the army from mutually
supporting each other, the level ground between the hills being
impassable. While they were in this condition two out of the three
divisions were suddenly attacked in the king's absence and
overwhelmed. After annihilating them the enemy invested the third
hill, where the king was present in person. The Lucanian refugees
managed to communicate with their countrymen, and promised, if a safe
return were guaranteed to them, to place the king in their hands alive
or dead. Alexander, with a picked body of troops, cut his way, with
splendid courage, through the enemy, and meeting the Lucanian general
slew him after a hand to hand fight. Then getting together those of
his men who were scattered in flight, he rode towards the ruins of a
bridge which had been carried away by the floods and came to a river.
Whilst his men were fording it with very uncertain footing, a soldier,
almost spent by his exertions and his fears, cursed the river for its
unlucky name, and said, "Rightly art thou called Acheros!" When these
words fell on his ear the king at once recalled to mind the oracular
warning, and stopped, doubtful whether to cross or not. Sotimus, one
of his personal attendants, asked him why he hesitated at such a
critical moment and drew his attention to the suspicious movements of
the Lucanian refugees who were evidently meditating treachery. The
king looked back and saw them coming on in a compact body; he at once
drew his sword and spurred his horse through the middle of the river.
He had already reached the shallow water on the other side when one of
the refugees some distance away transfixed him with a javelin. He fell
from his horse, and his lifeless body with the weapon sticking in it
was carried down by the current to that part of the bank where the
enemy were stationed. There it was horribly mutilated. After cutting
it through the middle they sent one half to Consentia and kept the
other to make sport of. Whilst they were pelting it at a distance with
darts and stones a solitary woman ventured among the rabble who were
showing such incredible brutality and implored them to desist. She
told them amid her tears that her husband and children were held
prisoners by the enemy and she hoped to ransom them with the king's
body however much it might have been disfigured. This put an end to
the outrages. What was left of the limbs was cremated at Consentia by
the reverential care of this one woman, and the bones were sent back
to Metapontum; from there they were carried to Cleopatra, the king's
wife, and Olympias, his sister, the latter of whom was the mother, the
former the sister of Alexander the Great. I thought it well to give
this brief account of the tragic end of Alexander of Epirus, for
although Fortune kept him from hostilities with Rome, the wars he
waged in Italy entitle him to a place in this history." - Livy,
History of Rome 8.24


"Euripides and Sophocles and many others have said of her that she
boasted that she excelled the Nereids in beauty. For this she was put
among the constellations, seated in a chair. On account of her
impiety, as the sky turns, she seems to be carried along lying on her
back." - Hyginus, Astronomica II.10

Today is the culmination of the constellation Cassiopeia - it
reaches its zenith in the night sky. Cassiopeia was the wife of
Cepheus, the Ethiopian king of Joppa (now known as Jaffa, in Israel),
and the mother of Andromeda. The queen was both beautiful and vain,
and the story of how her vanity caused great distress is told in
relation to the constellation Andromeda. After promising her daughter
in marriage to Perseus, Cassiopeia had second thoughts. She convinced
one of Poseidon's sons, Agenor, to disrupt the ceremony by claiming
Andromeda for himself. Agenor arrived with an entire army, and a
fierce struggle ensued. In the battle Cassiopeia is said to have
cried "Perseus must die". At any rate it was Perseus who was
victorious, with the help of the Gorgon's head. Perseus had recently
slain Medusa, the Gorgon, and had put its head in a bed of coral. He
retrieved the head and waved it in midst of the warring wedding party,
instantly turning them all to stone. In the group was both Cepheus and
Cassiopeia. A contrite Poseidon put both father and mother in the
heavens. But because of Cassiopeia's vanity, he placed her in a chair
which revolves around the Pole Star, so half the time she's obliged to
sit upside down. The Romans knew Cassiopeia as "Muller Sedis", the
"Woman of the Chair"; or simply as "Sedes", qualified by "regalis" or
"regia".



In ancient Latvia, today was celebrated as the festival of Martini.
Martini was celebrated to mark the end of the autumn and the beginning
of winter. The festival marks the transfer from Usins to Martins, two
deities of horses. The god Usins is invoked during the summer, while
Martins is a winter god. The festival marked the end of the
preparations for winter, such as salting meat and fish, storing the
harvest and making preserves. Martini also marked the beginning of
masquerading and sledding, among other wintry activities.



Valete bene!

Cato
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81830 From: Diana Octavia Date: 2010-11-10
Subject: Re: Resignation from the Board of Directors
Really Caesar? And I've hardly posted at all to the BA in months. But it is
nice to know that I am still important enough to have enemies ha ha ha!!
Vale,
Diana

----- Original Message -----
From: "Gnaeus Iulius Caesar" <gn_iulius_caesar@...>
To: <Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Tuesday, November 09, 2010 8:53 AM
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Resignation from the Board of Directors


You got a honourable mention in his ranting post as well Diana. I think you
were included in the list of evil plotters on the Back Alley seeking to
undermine the morals of NR and overthrow the religio piscina.

Caesar
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81831 From: lathyrus77 Date: 2010-11-10
Subject: Re: Notice of Moderation
--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, QFabiusMaxmi@... wrote:
>
>
>
> In a message dated 11/9/2010 12:53:31 A.M. Pacific Standard Time,
> lathyrus77@... writes:
>
> I wouldn't include Palladius in your group. At least not the group he's
> referring to.
>
> ===
> Anna you are like a tarnished brass ase. Always turning up when you least
> expect it.
>
> To not include D. Iunius Palladius Censor and Consul in any discussion of
> the original organizers of Nova Roma is insulting to that person and his
> endeavors.
>

Salve,

Except no one was referring to original organizers. The group that he was referring to was more about people who have been destructive to Nova Roma, causing people to resign, being impious, etc. Palladius is not one of these people.


Vale,

Anna Bucci
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81832 From: Sabinus Date: 2010-11-10
Subject: The Collegium Pontificum is called into session.
SALVETE!

The Collegium Pontificum is called into session starting with 07.00 hr.(Rome time) on a.d.III Id Nov 2763 a.U.c (Thursday 11 November 2010) until 19.00 hr.(Rome time) on a.d.XII Kal Dec 2763 a.U.c (Saturday 20 November 2010)

The session schedule.

Contio:

Starting with 07.00 hr.(Rome time) on a.d.III Id Nov 2763 a.U.c (Thursday 11 November 2010) until 19.00 hr.(Rome time) on pr. Id Nov 2763 a.U.c (Friday 12 November 2010).
The session is suspended on Id Nov and a.d. XVIII Kal Dec 2763 a.U.c (Saturday 13 and Sunday 14 November 2010).
The discussions will continue with 07.00 hr.(Rome time) on a.d XVII Kal Dec 2763 a.U.c (Monday 15 November 2010) until 19.00 hr.(Rome time) on a.d. XVI Kal Dec (Tuesday 16 November 2010).

Vote:

Starting with 07.00 hr.(Rome time) on a.d XV Kal Dec 2763 a.U.c (Wednesday 17 November 2010) and conclude at 19.00 hr.(Rome time) on a.d XII Kal Dec 2763 a.U.c (Saturday, 20 November 2763).

QUOD BONUM FAUSTVM FELIX FORTUNATUMQUE SIT POPULO ROMANO QUIRITIBUS

Unique item of agenda:
Collegium Pontificum elect a new Pontifex Maximus from the list of available pontifices. They are:
- Pontifex M. Antonius Gryllus Graecus.
- Pontifex Cn. Cornelius Lentulus.
- Pontifex Q. Caecilius Metellus Pius Postumianus.
- Pontifex K. Fabius Buteo Modianus.
- Pontifex Q. Fabius Maximus.
- Pontifex T. Iulius Sabinus.
- Pontifex M. Moravius Piscinus Horatianus.
Pontifices who want to withdraw their names form the list, can inform the Collegium Pontificum during the contio.

VALETE,
T. Iulius Sabinus
Pontifex.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81833 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2010-11-10
Subject: Re: The Collegium Pontificum is called into session.
Ave Pontiff,

Would it be easier from the start to at least remove those pontiffs from the
list who have not paid their tax?

Respectfully,

Sulla

On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 7:34 AM, Sabinus <iulius_sabinus@...> wrote:

>
>
> SALVETE!
>
> The Collegium Pontificum is called into session starting with 07.00
> hr.(Rome time) on a.d.III Id Nov 2763 a.U.c (Thursday 11 November 2010)
> until 19.00 hr.(Rome time) on a.d.XII Kal Dec 2763 a.U.c (Saturday 20
> November 2010)
>
> The session schedule.
>
> Contio:
>
> Starting with 07.00 hr.(Rome time) on a.d.III Id Nov 2763 a.U.c (Thursday
> 11 November 2010) until 19.00 hr.(Rome time) on pr. Id Nov 2763 a.U.c
> (Friday 12 November 2010).
> The session is suspended on Id Nov and a.d. XVIII Kal Dec 2763 a.U.c
> (Saturday 13 and Sunday 14 November 2010).
> The discussions will continue with 07.00 hr.(Rome time) on a.d XVII Kal Dec
> 2763 a.U.c (Monday 15 November 2010) until 19.00 hr.(Rome time) on a.d. XVI
> Kal Dec (Tuesday 16 November 2010).
>
> Vote:
>
> Starting with 07.00 hr.(Rome time) on a.d XV Kal Dec 2763 a.U.c (Wednesday
> 17 November 2010) and conclude at 19.00 hr.(Rome time) on a.d XII Kal Dec
> 2763 a.U.c (Saturday, 20 November 2763).
>
> QUOD BONUM FAUSTVM FELIX FORTUNATUMQUE SIT POPULO ROMANO QUIRITIBUS
>
> Unique item of agenda:
> Collegium Pontificum elect a new Pontifex Maximus from the list of
> available pontifices. They are:
> - Pontifex M. Antonius Gryllus Graecus.
> - Pontifex Cn. Cornelius Lentulus.
> - Pontifex Q. Caecilius Metellus Pius Postumianus.
> - Pontifex K. Fabius Buteo Modianus.
> - Pontifex Q. Fabius Maximus.
> - Pontifex T. Iulius Sabinus.
> - Pontifex M. Moravius Piscinus Horatianus.
> Pontifices who want to withdraw their names form the list, can inform the
> Collegium Pontificum during the contio.
>
> VALETE,
> T. Iulius Sabinus
> Pontifex.
>
>
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81834 From: iulius sabinus Date: 2010-11-10
Subject: Re: The Collegium Pontificum is called into session.
SALVE!
 
The Collegium Pontificum has its own regulation. In our case only the PM can remove other religious officials for not paying the tax. The current PM is not listed as taxpayer therefore is improper for him to take action against other in the same situation.
The new PM can take decisions in that problem. Until then all pontifices have equal chances.
 
VALE,
T. Iulius Sabinus

"Every individual is the architect of his own fortune" - Appius Claudius

--- On Wed, 11/10/10, Robert Woolwine <robert.woolwine@...> wrote:


From: Robert Woolwine <robert.woolwine@...>
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] The Collegium Pontificum is called into session.
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Date: Wednesday, November 10, 2010, 4:36 PM


Ave Pontiff,

Would it be easier from the start to at least remove those pontiffs from the
list who have not paid their tax?

Respectfully,

Sulla

On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 7:34 AM, Sabinus <iulius_sabinus@...> wrote:

>
>
> SALVETE!
>
> The Collegium Pontificum is called into session starting with 07.00
> hr.(Rome time) on a.d.III Id Nov 2763 a.U.c (Thursday 11 November 2010)
> until 19.00 hr.(Rome time) on a.d.XII Kal Dec 2763 a.U.c (Saturday 20
> November 2010)
>
> The session schedule.
>
> Contio:
>
> Starting with 07.00 hr.(Rome time) on a.d.III Id Nov 2763 a.U.c (Thursday
> 11 November 2010) until 19.00 hr.(Rome time) on pr. Id Nov 2763 a.U.c
> (Friday 12 November 2010).
> The session is suspended on Id Nov and a.d. XVIII Kal Dec 2763 a.U.c
> (Saturday 13 and Sunday 14 November 2010).
> The discussions will continue with 07.00 hr.(Rome time) on a.d XVII Kal Dec
> 2763 a.U.c (Monday 15 November 2010) until 19.00 hr.(Rome time) on a.d. XVI
> Kal Dec (Tuesday 16 November 2010).
>
> Vote:
>
> Starting with 07.00 hr.(Rome time) on a.d XV Kal Dec 2763 a.U.c (Wednesday
> 17 November 2010) and conclude at 19.00 hr.(Rome time) on a.d XII Kal Dec
> 2763 a.U.c (Saturday, 20 November 2763).
>
> QUOD BONUM FAUSTVM FELIX FORTUNATUMQUE SIT POPULO ROMANO QUIRITIBUS
>
> Unique item of agenda:
> Collegium Pontificum elect a new Pontifex Maximus from the list of
> available pontifices. They are:
> - Pontifex M. Antonius Gryllus Graecus.
> - Pontifex Cn. Cornelius Lentulus.
> - Pontifex Q. Caecilius Metellus Pius Postumianus.
> - Pontifex K. Fabius Buteo Modianus.
> - Pontifex Q. Fabius Maximus.
> - Pontifex T. Iulius Sabinus.
> - Pontifex M. Moravius Piscinus Horatianus.
> Pontifices who want to withdraw their names form the list, can inform the
> Collegium Pontificum during the contio.
>
> VALETE,
> T. Iulius Sabinus
> Pontifex.
>
> 
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



------------------------------------

Yahoo! Groups Links








[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81835 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2010-11-10
Subject: Re: The Collegium Pontificum is called into session.
Ave!

Thank you for the explanation. It is very appreciated.

Respectfully,

Sulla

On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 7:43 AM, iulius sabinus <iulius_sabinus@...>wrote:

>
>
> SALVE!
>
> The Collegium Pontificum has its own regulation. In our case only the PM
> can remove other religious officials for not paying the tax. The current PM
> is not listed as taxpayer therefore is improper for him to take action
> against other in the same situation.
> The new PM can take decisions in that problem. Until then all pontifices
> have equal chances.
>
> VALE,
> T. Iulius Sabinus
>
> "Every individual is the architect of his own fortune" - Appius Claudius
>
> --- On Wed, 11/10/10, Robert Woolwine <robert.woolwine@...<robert.woolwine%40gmail.com>>
> wrote:
>
> From: Robert Woolwine <robert.woolwine@...<robert.woolwine%40gmail.com>
> >
> Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] The Collegium Pontificum is called into session.
> To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com <Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com>
> Date: Wednesday, November 10, 2010, 4:36 PM
>
>
> Ave Pontiff,
>
> Would it be easier from the start to at least remove those pontiffs from
> the
> list who have not paid their tax?
>
> Respectfully,
>
> Sulla
>
> On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 7:34 AM, Sabinus <iulius_sabinus@...<iulius_sabinus%40yahoo.com>>
> wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > SALVETE!
> >
> > The Collegium Pontificum is called into session starting with 07.00
> > hr.(Rome time) on a.d.III Id Nov 2763 a.U.c (Thursday 11 November 2010)
> > until 19.00 hr.(Rome time) on a.d.XII Kal Dec 2763 a.U.c (Saturday 20
> > November 2010)
> >
> > The session schedule.
> >
> > Contio:
> >
> > Starting with 07.00 hr.(Rome time) on a.d.III Id Nov 2763 a.U.c (Thursday
> > 11 November 2010) until 19.00 hr.(Rome time) on pr. Id Nov 2763 a.U.c
> > (Friday 12 November 2010).
> > The session is suspended on Id Nov and a.d. XVIII Kal Dec 2763 a.U.c
> > (Saturday 13 and Sunday 14 November 2010).
> > The discussions will continue with 07.00 hr.(Rome time) on a.d XVII Kal
> Dec
> > 2763 a.U.c (Monday 15 November 2010) until 19.00 hr.(Rome time) on a.d.
> XVI
> > Kal Dec (Tuesday 16 November 2010).
> >
> > Vote:
> >
> > Starting with 07.00 hr.(Rome time) on a.d XV Kal Dec 2763 a.U.c
> (Wednesday
> > 17 November 2010) and conclude at 19.00 hr.(Rome time) on a.d XII Kal Dec
> > 2763 a.U.c (Saturday, 20 November 2763).
> >
> > QUOD BONUM FAUSTVM FELIX FORTUNATUMQUE SIT POPULO ROMANO QUIRITIBUS
> >
> > Unique item of agenda:
> > Collegium Pontificum elect a new Pontifex Maximus from the list of
> > available pontifices. They are:
> > - Pontifex M. Antonius Gryllus Graecus.
> > - Pontifex Cn. Cornelius Lentulus.
> > - Pontifex Q. Caecilius Metellus Pius Postumianus.
> > - Pontifex K. Fabius Buteo Modianus.
> > - Pontifex Q. Fabius Maximus.
> > - Pontifex T. Iulius Sabinus.
> > - Pontifex M. Moravius Piscinus Horatianus.
> > Pontifices who want to withdraw their names form the list, can inform the
> > Collegium Pontificum during the contio.
> >
> > VALETE,
> > T. Iulius Sabinus
> > Pontifex.
> >
> >
> >
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81836 From: iulius sabinus Date: 2010-11-10
Subject: Re: The Collegium Pontificum is called into session.
SALVE!
 
You are welcome.
 
VALE,
Sabinus

"Every individual is the architect of his own fortune" - Appius Claudius

--- On Wed, 11/10/10, Robert Woolwine <robert.woolwine@...> wrote:


From: Robert Woolwine <robert.woolwine@...>
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] The Collegium Pontificum is called into session.
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Date: Wednesday, November 10, 2010, 4:44 PM


Ave!

Thank you for the explanation.  It is very appreciated.

Respectfully,

Sulla

On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 7:43 AM, iulius sabinus <iulius_sabinus@...>wrote:

>
>
> SALVE!
>
> The Collegium Pontificum has its own regulation. In our case only the PM
> can remove other religious officials for not paying the tax. The current PM
> is not listed as taxpayer therefore is improper for him to take action
> against other in the same situation.
> The new PM can take decisions in that problem. Until then all pontifices
> have equal chances.
>
> VALE,
> T. Iulius Sabinus
>
> "Every individual is the architect of his own fortune" - Appius Claudius
>
> --- On Wed, 11/10/10, Robert Woolwine <robert.woolwine@...<robert.woolwine%40gmail.com>>
> wrote:
>
> From: Robert Woolwine <robert.woolwine@...<robert.woolwine%40gmail.com>
> >
> Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] The Collegium Pontificum is called into session.
> To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com <Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com>
> Date: Wednesday, November 10, 2010, 4:36 PM
>
>
> Ave Pontiff,
>
> Would it be easier from the start to at least remove those pontiffs from
> the
> list who have not paid their tax?
>
> Respectfully,
>
> Sulla
>
> On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 7:34 AM, Sabinus <iulius_sabinus@...<iulius_sabinus%40yahoo.com>>
> wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > SALVETE!
> >
> > The Collegium Pontificum is called into session starting with 07.00
> > hr.(Rome time) on a.d.III Id Nov 2763 a.U.c (Thursday 11 November 2010)
> > until 19.00 hr.(Rome time) on a.d.XII Kal Dec 2763 a.U.c (Saturday 20
> > November 2010)
> >
> > The session schedule.
> >
> > Contio:
> >
> > Starting with 07.00 hr.(Rome time) on a.d.III Id Nov 2763 a.U.c (Thursday
> > 11 November 2010) until 19.00 hr.(Rome time) on pr. Id Nov 2763 a.U.c
> > (Friday 12 November 2010).
> > The session is suspended on Id Nov and a.d. XVIII Kal Dec 2763 a.U.c
> > (Saturday 13 and Sunday 14 November 2010).
> > The discussions will continue with 07.00 hr.(Rome time) on a.d XVII Kal
> Dec
> > 2763 a.U.c (Monday 15 November 2010) until 19.00 hr.(Rome time) on a.d.
> XVI
> > Kal Dec (Tuesday 16 November 2010).
> >
> > Vote:
> >
> > Starting with 07.00 hr.(Rome time) on a.d XV Kal Dec 2763 a.U.c
> (Wednesday
> > 17 November 2010) and conclude at 19.00 hr.(Rome time) on a.d XII Kal Dec
> > 2763 a.U.c (Saturday, 20 November 2763).
> >
> > QUOD BONUM FAUSTVM FELIX FORTUNATUMQUE SIT POPULO ROMANO QUIRITIBUS
> >
> > Unique item of agenda:
> > Collegium Pontificum elect a new Pontifex Maximus from the list of
> > available pontifices. They are:
> > - Pontifex M. Antonius Gryllus Graecus.
> > - Pontifex Cn. Cornelius Lentulus.
> > - Pontifex Q. Caecilius Metellus Pius Postumianus.
> > - Pontifex K. Fabius Buteo Modianus.
> > - Pontifex Q. Fabius Maximus.
> > - Pontifex T. Iulius Sabinus.
> > - Pontifex M. Moravius Piscinus Horatianus.
> > Pontifices who want to withdraw their names form the list, can inform the
> > Collegium Pontificum during the contio.
> >
> > VALETE,
> > T. Iulius Sabinus
> > Pontifex.
> >
> >
> >
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
> 
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



------------------------------------

Yahoo! Groups Links








[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81837 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2010-11-10
Subject: Re: Notice of Moderation
Ave!

Impious? You mean kinda like hanging out at Stormfront? LOL sheesh!

You do remember Palladius gave you the nickname that many of us used in
the. How convenient she forgets.

Vale,

Sulla

On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 8:08 PM, lathyrus77 <lathyrus77@...> wrote:

>
>
>
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com <Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com>,
> QFabiusMaxmi@... wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > In a message dated 11/9/2010 12:53:31 A.M. Pacific Standard Time,
> > lathyrus77@... writes:
> >
> > I wouldn't include Palladius in your group. At least not the group he's
> > referring to.
> >
> > ===
> > Anna you are like a tarnished brass ase. Always turning up when you least
>
> > expect it.
> >
> > To not include D. Iunius Palladius Censor and Consul in any discussion of
>
> > the original organizers of Nova Roma is insulting to that person and his
> > endeavors.
> >
>
> Salve,
>
> Except no one was referring to original organizers. The group that he was
> referring to was more about people who have been destructive to Nova Roma,
> causing people to resign, being impious, etc. Palladius is not one of these
> people.
>
> Vale,
>
> Anna Bucci
>
>
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81838 From: lathyrus77 Date: 2010-11-11
Subject: Re: Notice of Moderation
Salve,


--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Robert Woolwine <robert.woolwine@...> wrote:
>
> Ave!
>
> Impious? You mean kinda like hanging out at Stormfront? LOL sheesh!
>


If by "hanging out at stormfront" you mean "disregarding the gods of Rome" then yes.



> You do remember Palladius gave you the nickname that many of us used in
> the. How convenient she forgets.
>

Palladius is good people. You are not.


Vale,

Anna Bucci
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81839 From: Cato Date: 2010-11-11
Subject: a.d. III Id. Nov.
Cato omnibus in foro SPD

Hodie est ante diem III Idus Novembris; haec dies comitialis est.


"A lectisternium took place this year [326 B.C.], the fifth since the
foundation of the City, and the same deities were propitiated in this
as in the former one. The new consuls, acting on the orders of the
people, sent heralds to deliver a formal declaration of war to the
Samnites, and made all their preparations on a much greater scale for
this war than for the one against the Greeks. New and unexpected
succours were forthcoming, for the Lucanians and Apulians, with whom
Rome had up to that time established no relations, came forward with
offers to make an alliance and promised armed assistance; a friendly
alliance was formed with them. Meantime the operations in Samnium were
attended with success, the towns of Allifae, Callifae, and Rufrium
passed into the hands of the Romans, and ever since the consuls had
entered the country the rest of the territory was ravaged far and
wide. Whilst this war was commencing thus favourably, the other war
against the Greeks was approaching its close. Not only were the two
towns Palaeopolis and Neapolis cut off from all communication with
each other by the enemy's lines, but the townsfolk within the walls
were practically prisoners to their own defenders, and were suffering
more from them than from anything which the outside enemy could do;
their wives and children were exposed to such extreme indignities as
are only inflicted when cities are stormed and sacked. A report
reached them that succours were coming from Tarentum and from the
Samnites. They considered that they had more Samnites than they wanted
already within their walls, but the force from Tarentum composed of
Greeks, they were prepared to welcome, being Greeks themselves, and
through their means they hoped to resist the Samnites and the Nolans
no less than the Romans. At last, surrender to the Romans seemed the
less of the two evils. Charilaus and Nymphius, the leading men in the
city, arranged with one another the respective parts they were to
play. One was to desert to the Roman commander, the other to remain in
the city and prepare it for the successful execution of their plot.
Charilaus was the one who went to Publilius Philo. After expressing
the hope that all might turn out for the good and happiness of
Palaeopolis and Rome, he went on to say that he had decided to deliver
up the fortifications. Whether in doing this he should be found to
have preserved his country or betrayed it depended upon the Roman
sense of honour. For himself he made no terms and asked for no
conditions, but for his countrymen he begged rather than stipulated
that if his design succeeded the people of Rome should take into
consideration the eagerness with which they sought to renew the old
friendly relations, and the risk attending their action rather than
their folly and recklessness in breaking the old ties of duty. The
Roman commander gave his approval to the proposed scheme and furnished
him with 3000 men to seize that part of the city which was in the
occupation of the Samnites. L. Quinctius, a military tribune, was in
command of this force." - Livy, History of Rome 8.25



Today is the feast day of St. Martin of Tours. While on horseback in
Amiens in Gaul (modern France), he encountered a naked beggar and
impulsively cut his own military cloak in half and shared it.

The monastery that he founded, known in Latin as the "Larger Monastery" or Maius monasterium became known as Marmoutier in later French. The words "chapel" and "chaplain" come from "cappella", "short cloak" in Latin. The men charged with preserving St Martin's cloak were called the "cappellani" or "chaplains" and from them was applied the name "capellam" to the royal oratory that was not a regular church, but a "chapel".

According to legend, Martin walked once on a pilgrimage to Rome, meeting on the road Satan, who ridiculed him for not riding, as a bishop ought. Martin turned the Devil into a mule, then rode him, spurring the lazy beast on with the sign of the cross. The Devil cursed him with a doublet of Latin palindromes:

"Signa te Signa: temere me tangis et angis --- Roma tibi subito
motibus ibit amor"

meaning,

"Cross, cross thyself: thou plaguest and vexest me without necessity;
for, owing to my exertions, thou wilt soon reach Rome, the object of
thy wishes."



"To us in America, the reflections of Armistice Day will be filled
with solemn pride in the heroism of those who died in the country's
service and with gratitude for the victory, both because of the thing
from which it has freed us and because of the opportunity it has given
America to show her sympathy with peace and justice in the councils of
the nation." - U.S. President Woodrow Wilson, proclaiming Armistice
Day on 11 November A.D. 1919

Today is Armistice, or Veterans', Day. Armistice Day is the
anniversary of the official end of World War I, November 11, 1918. It
commemorates the armistice signed between the Allies and Germany at
Rethondes in Compiegne, France, for the cessation of hostilities on
the Western Front, which took effect at eleven o'clock in the morning
— the "eleventh hour of the eleventh day of the eleventh month." While
this official date to mark the end of the war reflects the ceasefire
on the Western Front, hostilities continued in other regions,
especially across the former Russian Empire and in parts of the old
Ottoman Empire. After World War II, it was changed to "Veterans' Day"
in the United States.


Valete bene!

Cato
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81840 From: C.Maria Caeca Date: 2010-11-11
Subject: Rememberance
C. Maria Caeca omnibus in foro S. P. D.

I beg your indulgence, because I wish to take a few moments to talk about
this day, and what it means, at least to me. When I was an impressionable
little girl (in a Universe long, long ago), Veterans Day, November 11, was
celebrated as Armistice Day, and essentially commemorated the end of the
First World War. Implicit in that celebration, though, was the remembrance,
and honoring of all war dead, from all Nations, no matter for whom they
fought, or why.

At 11:11 AM, we would stop what we wee doing (this was at recess, so that
usually meant I was outside), and TAPS would be played over our loud
speakers. I wasn't sure why, or what, exactly I was doing, but it felt
right and appropriate to stand quietly, head bowed, and as I grew older, and
learned, this little custom became more and more precious to me.

Therefore, today, I sit quietly for a few minutes, and consider, honor and
pray to the gods for the peace of, all who died in war, no matter their
politics, their Nation, or there relationship to my Nation. I will
specifically honor my own (Nationally and personally) war dead on Memorial
Day, but today, I am reminded that destruction, devastation and loss do not
respect national boundaries, and the suffering they create is universal.

Courage, valor and the willingness to perform one's duty, even to the last
breath, also have no national boundaries, and those who were so devoted to
their countries have become, in truth, a brotherhood (and yes, that
emphatically includes women, I use the word as all-encompassing) of honor,
and I offer reverence for their virtue, and also to the bravery and
endurance of those loved ones they left behind, who found it necessary to
continue in the face of the vacuum left by the loss of a beloved one. This,
too, counts when tallying the cost and the duties of war, although it is
seldom spoken of.

We have expanded our celebration of this day to include all Veterans, of all
wars, and I think that is more than appropriate, but, I also think that,
because it was the First World War that changed the face of conflict
forever, and was the first war to include participants from virtually every
corner of the Earth, it is good to remember how, and why, the day became
special and sacred. to that end, as I always do, on the day, I quote the
famous WWI poem, "In Flanders Fields" as a reminder, and, perhaps, a focus
for meditation, should you choose to do that.

With profound respect to each of you, and with deepest reverence to those we
celebrate today,

Valete,
C. Maria Caeca, Sacerdos Vestae

In Flanders Fields
by John McCrae, May 1915


In Flanders fields the poppies blow
Between the crosses, row on row,
That mark our place; and in the sky
The larks, still bravely singing, fly
Scarce heard amid the guns below.

We are the Dead. Short days ago
We lived, felt dawn, saw sunset glow,
Loved and were loved, and now we lie
In Flanders fields.

Take up our quarrel with the foe:
To you from failing hands we throw
The torch; be yours to hold it high.
If ye break faith with us who die
We shall not sleep, though poppies grow
In Flanders fields.


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81841 From: Publius Memmius Albucius Date: 2010-11-11
Subject: The senate is called in session (Nov. nb 2)
P. Memmius Albucius cos. and co-president to all Nova Roma Inc. directors (�senators�)


Considering that I have taken at dawn, this a.d. IV Idus Nov. 2763 auc (We. 10 Nov., 2010), the auspices for the good holding of a session of the Board, as far as it is concerned as Senatus romanus and under Nova Roma internal rules ;

Considering that these auspices were favorable ;

Considering that it is however necessary, in the current period lived by our Corporation (�Republic�), that the requirements and protection of the incorporation Law (MRSA) be respected in the best conformity of the internal rules of our community (Roman Laws) ;

Quod bonum felixque sit populo romano quiritium, I :

Art. 1 : hereby convene the Board of Nova Roma for a session. Its advice and/or decision is asked, in the frame of this session, on the agenda presented in the relatio below ;

Art. 2 : The time table of the whole session is the following one, every hour being expressed for Rome time:
a)
4.1. Session
Beginning: sunset, pr. idus Nov. (Nov. 12) ; end: sunset a.d. XIII Kal. Dec. (Nov. 19)
4.2. Contio
Beginning: 13:00 hour, pr. idus Nov. (Nov. 12) ; end: 13:00 hour, a.d. XV Kal. Dec. (Nov. 17)
4.3. Vote
Beginning: 14:00 hour, a.d. XV Kal. Dec. (Nov. 17) ; end: sunset - � h a.d. XIII Kal. Dec. (Nov. 19)


b) The session will be suspended on the Ides of November, dies nefastus publicus (Nov. 13, 2763), and the Senate-Board therefore be closed.




Art. 5 : The relatio ('agenda') of the present session is the following one:

Item I � Elections � entry in office (date) � tribunes and other mag. - SCU suspending the constitution (discussion + vote)
Item II � Financial report and other financial and fiscal NR Inc. obligations � request from former sen. Moravius - official position of Nova Roma (discussion + vote)
Item III � Sexual harassment � request from former sen. Moravius - official position of Nova Roma (discussion + vote)
Item IV � Equites � Annual financial contribution - applicability in time (discussion + vote)
Item V � Taxes 2764 auc � Amount - magistrates, officers and citizens respective status (discussion + vote)
Item VI � Religious colleges - CP - Election of a new PM (information)



Art. 6 : The items mentioned in the article 5 may be completed in the following days and no later than Nov. 15, by additional items or, for further information, by attached documents, which will be placed as usual in the Board ('Senatus Romanus') files section.



Thanks for your attention, Senators-directors. Have all a good session and valete, Matres Patresque.



P. Memmius Albucius cos.
1st co-president



Datum a.d. III Idus Nov. 2763 auc (Nov. 11, 2010 cc)

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81842 From: Timothy or Stephen Gallagher Date: 2010-11-11
Subject: Re: Rememberance
Salve Maria Caeca,

VERY NICE and well said.

...."Veterans Day, November 11, was celebrated as Armistice Day, .... and before it was Armistice Day, it was Decoration day for the service men of the American Civil War.

PAX

Vale

Ti. Galerius Paulinus




To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
From: c.mariacaeca@...
Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2010 10:40:11 -0500
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Rememberance






C. Maria Caeca omnibus in foro S. P. D.

I beg your indulgence, because I wish to take a few moments to talk about
this day, and what it means, at least to me. When I was an impressionable
little girl (in a Universe long, long ago), Veterans Day, November 11, was
celebrated as Armistice Day, and essentially commemorated the end of the
First World War. Implicit in that celebration, though, was the remembrance,
and honoring of all war dead, from all Nations, no matter for whom they
fought, or why.

At 11:11 AM, we would stop what we wee doing (this was at recess, so that
usually meant I was outside), and TAPS would be played over our loud
speakers. I wasn't sure why, or what, exactly I was doing, but it felt
right and appropriate to stand quietly, head bowed, and as I grew older, and
learned, this little custom became more and more precious to me.

Therefore, today, I sit quietly for a few minutes, and consider, honor and
pray to the gods for the peace of, all who died in war, no matter their
politics, their Nation, or there relationship to my Nation. I will
specifically honor my own (Nationally and personally) war dead on Memorial
Day, but today, I am reminded that destruction, devastation and loss do not
respect national boundaries, and the suffering they create is universal.

Courage, valor and the willingness to perform one's duty, even to the last
breath, also have no national boundaries, and those who were so devoted to
their countries have become, in truth, a brotherhood (and yes, that
emphatically includes women, I use the word as all-encompassing) of honor,
and I offer reverence for their virtue, and also to the bravery and
endurance of those loved ones they left behind, who found it necessary to
continue in the face of the vacuum left by the loss of a beloved one. This,
too, counts when tallying the cost and the duties of war, although it is
seldom spoken of.

We have expanded our celebration of this day to include all Veterans, of all
wars, and I think that is more than appropriate, but, I also think that,
because it was the First World War that changed the face of conflict
forever, and was the first war to include participants from virtually every
corner of the Earth, it is good to remember how, and why, the day became
special and sacred. to that end, as I always do, on the day, I quote the
famous WWI poem, "In Flanders Fields" as a reminder, and, perhaps, a focus
for meditation, should you choose to do that.

With profound respect to each of you, and with deepest reverence to those we
celebrate today,

Valete,
C. Maria Caeca, Sacerdos Vestae

In Flanders Fields
by John McCrae, May 1915

In Flanders fields the poppies blow
Between the crosses, row on row,
That mark our place; and in the sky
The larks, still bravely singing, fly
Scarce heard amid the guns below.

We are the Dead. Short days ago
We lived, felt dawn, saw sunset glow,
Loved and were loved, and now we lie
In Flanders fields.

Take up our quarrel with the foe:
To you from failing hands we throw
The torch; be yours to hold it high.
If ye break faith with us who die
We shall not sleep, though poppies grow
In Flanders fields.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]





[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81843 From: C.Maria Caeca Date: 2010-11-11
Subject: Re: Rememberance
C. Maria Caeca T. Gallerio Paulino Senatori S. P. D.

Thank you, Senator for correcting my error. I always forget this, and I
should not. I intended no disrespect, however.

Vale,
CMC
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81844 From: publiusalbucius Date: 2010-11-11
Subject: Re: Rememberance
Caecae Paulino s.d.

Living near these "killing fields" and being requested, as official, to attend Nov. 11 ceremonies in Gallia, I can confirm that this day is still an important one, even if youths, year after year, are forgetting the signification of this celebration.

All French surviving soldiers are now dead, since last year. A new period begins. More than ever, the work on memory must goes on and get improved.

From a Roman point of view, we cannot but keep in mind the courage of the individuals and of their families, and the conditions (cold, mud..) in which these soldiers lived. I know that today, like Paulinus, some of us have a special thoughts for parents who fought, suffered and are gone.

We must tell ourselves that, for the Rome we live and like too, the importance of keeping our memory alive, and teaching the new generations, is essential.


Vale Vestalis,


P. Memmius Albucius cos.






--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "C.Maria Caeca" <c.mariacaeca@...> wrote:
>
> C. Maria Caeca omnibus in foro S. P. D.
>
> I beg your indulgence, because I wish to take a few moments to talk about
> this day, and what it means, at least to me. When I was an impressionable
> little girl (in a Universe long, long ago), Veterans Day, November 11, was
> celebrated as Armistice Day, and essentially commemorated the end of the
> First World War. Implicit in that celebration, though, was the remembrance,
> and honoring of all war dead, from all Nations, no matter for whom they
> fought, or why.
>
> At 11:11 AM, we would stop what we wee doing (this was at recess, so that
> usually meant I was outside), and TAPS would be played over our loud
> speakers. I wasn't sure why, or what, exactly I was doing, but it felt
> right and appropriate to stand quietly, head bowed, and as I grew older, and
> learned, this little custom became more and more precious to me.
>
> Therefore, today, I sit quietly for a few minutes, and consider, honor and
> pray to the gods for the peace of, all who died in war, no matter their
> politics, their Nation, or there relationship to my Nation. I will
> specifically honor my own (Nationally and personally) war dead on Memorial
> Day, but today, I am reminded that destruction, devastation and loss do not
> respect national boundaries, and the suffering they create is universal.
>
> Courage, valor and the willingness to perform one's duty, even to the last
> breath, also have no national boundaries, and those who were so devoted to
> their countries have become, in truth, a brotherhood (and yes, that
> emphatically includes women, I use the word as all-encompassing) of honor,
> and I offer reverence for their virtue, and also to the bravery and
> endurance of those loved ones they left behind, who found it necessary to
> continue in the face of the vacuum left by the loss of a beloved one. This,
> too, counts when tallying the cost and the duties of war, although it is
> seldom spoken of.
>
> We have expanded our celebration of this day to include all Veterans, of all
> wars, and I think that is more than appropriate, but, I also think that,
> because it was the First World War that changed the face of conflict
> forever, and was the first war to include participants from virtually every
> corner of the Earth, it is good to remember how, and why, the day became
> special and sacred. to that end, as I always do, on the day, I quote the
> famous WWI poem, "In Flanders Fields" as a reminder, and, perhaps, a focus
> for meditation, should you choose to do that.
>
> With profound respect to each of you, and with deepest reverence to those we
> celebrate today,
>
> Valete,
> C. Maria Caeca, Sacerdos Vestae
>
> In Flanders Fields
> by John McCrae, May 1915
>
>
> In Flanders fields the poppies blow
> Between the crosses, row on row,
> That mark our place; and in the sky
> The larks, still bravely singing, fly
> Scarce heard amid the guns below.
>
> We are the Dead. Short days ago
> We lived, felt dawn, saw sunset glow,
> Loved and were loved, and now we lie
> In Flanders fields.
>
> Take up our quarrel with the foe:
> To you from failing hands we throw
> The torch; be yours to hold it high.
> If ye break faith with us who die
> We shall not sleep, though poppies grow
> In Flanders fields.
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81845 From: Marcus Prometheus Date: 2010-11-11
Subject: Italy: Would you like fries with your art history?
Italy: Would you like fries with your art history?

Ex-McDonald's executive aims to bring corporate savvy to Italy's financially
troubled museums and monuments.


By Nick Squires <http://www.csmonitor.com/About/Contact-Us-Feedback>, /
Correspondent / January 28, 2010
Rome

They are among the world's most prized treasures, repositories of art and
archaeology dating to before the Romans. But a bold initiative to put
Italy's museums and monuments under the stewardship of a former McDonald's
director has heritage guardians spluttering, fearing a "McDonaldization" of
culture.
Skip to next paragraph<http://www.csmonitor.com/World/Europe/2010/0128/Italy-Would-you-like-fries-with-your-art-history#nextParagraph>
Related Stories

- In Naples, artists use irony to tackle festering trash
crisis<http://www.csmonitor.com/Environment/Living-Green/2008/0506/in-naples-artists-use-irony-to-tackle-festering-trash-crisis>
- Italy: Is that Caravaggio hiding in that
painting?<http://www.csmonitor.com/World/Global-News/2009/1203/italy-is-that-caravaggio-hiding-in-that-painting>
- Art museums struggle with provenance
issues<http://www.csmonitor.com/The-Culture/Arts/2008/0402/p13s01-alar.html>

Mario Resca's appointment as "supermanager" of Italy's hundreds of state
museums and archaeological sites has pitched the dusty realms of curatorship
against a hard-edged business environment. Even his title � he is tasked
with the *valorizzazione*, or value-adding, of Italy's heritage � rattles
some museum directors.

Mr. Resca is now fine-tuning a master plan that, he hopes, will achieve
double-digit growth in visitors and revenue. He dismisses fears that his
appointment heralds the beginning of an era of tawdry commercialization.

He will not, he assures, offer fries with visits to the Uffizi in
Florence<http://www.csmonitor.com/1996/1224/122496.home.home.2.html>,
raise the Golden Arches over art galleries, or rebrand Donatello as
McDonatello. But he will bring the language of the boardroom to the
byzantine world of museum administration. "I see visitors as customers,
clients. When you come to one of my museums, you are a guest, and your needs
should be satisfied," he says.

He wants clearer explanations of what visitors see, better catering (not
necessarily McDonald's, he stresses), and welcoming staff. Changing the
funding of museums and monuments is a top priority. "Until now, the revenue
from ticket sales went into a big central government pot instead of to the
Culture Ministry," he says.

"If a light bulb broke at the Colos seum, they'd have to apply for funds to
buy a new one," Resca says. "By the time they got the money, another 10
would have broken. People told me, 'but it's always been like that.' But it
lacks all common sense."

With the Culture Ministry's budget facing cuts of $1.3 billion over the next
three years, Resca says that flagship attractions like the Colosseum must
pay their way by hosting, say, the launch of a new car. As long as care is
taken not to damage venues, he says, there is no reason why such
partnerships cannot succeed.

The appointment of Resca, a specialist in turning around ailing companies,
was part of a recognition that a country blessed with artistic gems often
seems unable to look after them. Foreign tourists are often shocked to find
stray dogs roaming the ancient city of Pompeii, drifts of litter between the
marble columns of Rome's Forum, and poor signage.

It also reflects the view that Italy must look to its past to ensure growth
and jobs in the future. "The era of factories is over," Resca says. "Our
future must lie in cultural tourism."

For a nation with native sons Leonardo da Vinci, Michel an gelo, and
Caravaggio, Italy punches way below its weight. Of the world's 10
most-visited museums, not one is Italian (the Vatican museums are part of
the independent city state of the Holy See).

The Louvre in Paris attracts 8.5 million visitors a year, and the British
Museum in London, 5 million. The Uffizi in Florence? Just 1.5 million.

"Twenty years ago, Italy was the No. 1 tourist destination in the world. Now
we're the sixth," says Resca. As head of McDonald's Italian operations for
12 years, he was seen by the museum world as a hostile outsider.

Resca claims he has assuaged many critics by touring museums and listening
to concerns rather than lecturing in management-speak. But he wants to see
more marketing and merchandising. "You go to the Louvre and you find Mona
Lisa T-shirts, Mona Lisa fridge magnets, Mona Lisa spoons," he says. "And
the Mona Lisa is by Leonardo da Vinci, who is Italian! We can learn from
that example."

And perhaps from another: Paris recently gave permission for a McDonald's to
open inside the Louvre.


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81846 From: GAIUS MARCIUS CRISPUS Date: 2010-11-11
Subject: Re: Rememberance
Salvete omnes

"At the going down of the sun, and in the morning, we will remember them".

Valete omnes
Crispus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81847 From: David Kling Date: 2010-11-11
Subject: Re: Rememberance
Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus C. Mariae Caecae salutem dicit

As a veteran and coming from a long line of veterans I am pleased that you
took the time to mention the significance of this day.

Vale;

Modianus

On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 10:40 AM, C.Maria Caeca <c.mariacaeca@...>wrote:

>
>
> C. Maria Caeca omnibus in foro S. P. D.
>
> I beg your indulgence, because I wish to take a few moments to talk about
> this day, and what it means, at least to me. When I was an impressionable
> little girl (in a Universe long, long ago), Veterans Day, November 11, was
> celebrated as Armistice Day, and essentially commemorated the end of the
> First World War. Implicit in that celebration, though, was the remembrance,
>
> and honoring of all war dead, from all Nations, no matter for whom they
> fought, or why.
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81848 From: Publius Ullerius Stephanus Venator Date: 2010-11-11
Subject: Re: Rememberance
Salve Caeca et Avete Omnes;

I have been able to trace veterans in my family line back to the early
1600's; none of them were "career men." All were men (and a few
women) who saw their duty to stand between danger and home.

None of my forebears died during this Sacred Service, but all gave of
themselves so that others need not. In my generation, this includes
my brother, my wife, a few cousins and me. Some of the children of
our generation have served or are serving.

Good Gods willing, Mankind will one day see the extinction of a need
for those who serve in this capacity.

But, we should never forget.

Thank you.

Venator - Machinatrix

Vermont National Guard '75 - '79 USAF Reserves '77 - '81
USAF Reserves '83 - '92 USAF '81 - '94
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81849 From: Jean-François Arnoud Date: 2010-11-11
Subject: Re : [Nova-Roma] Rememberance
Avete,

The father of my great mother was in the French army on the Somme River near the
Flander Fields during the 4 years of the WWI and, when I was a child, I watched
many photographs (black and white) of him and his army pals. Unfortunately his
brother in law, the brother of his wife, died in the early first days of this
war, killed by Germans in the time when French soldiers wore very colored
uniforms. I read the last letter he sent to his parents...

Optime valete.

C. Petronius Dexter
Arcoiali scribebat
pridie Idus Novembres P. Memmio K. Fabio II coss.




________________________________
De : David Kling <tau.athanasios@...>
À : Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Envoyé le : Jeu 11 novembre 2010, 19h 42min 35s
Objet : Re: [Nova-Roma] Rememberance

 
Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus C. Mariae Caecae salutem dicit

As a veteran and coming from a long line of veterans I am pleased that you
took the time to mention the significance of this day.

Vale;

Modianus

On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 10:40 AM, C.Maria Caeca <c.mariacaeca@...>wrote:

>
>
> C. Maria Caeca omnibus in foro S. P. D.
>
> I beg your indulgence, because I wish to take a few moments to talk about
> this day, and what it means, at least to me. When I was an impressionable
> little girl (in a Universe long, long ago), Veterans Day, November 11, was
> celebrated as Armistice Day, and essentially commemorated the end of the
> First World War. Implicit in that celebration, though, was the remembrance,
>
> and honoring of all war dead, from all Nations, no matter for whom they
> fought, or why.
>

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]







[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81850 From: Cato Date: 2010-11-12
Subject: prid. Id. Nov.
Cato omnibus in foro SPD

Hodiernus dies est pridie Idus Novembris; haec dies comitialis est.

"Nymphius at the same time approached the Samnite praetor and
persuaded him, now that the whole of the Roman fighting force was
either round Palaeopolis or engaged in Samnium, to allow him to sail
round with the fleet to the Roman seaboard and ravage not only the
coastal districts but even the country close to the city. But to
ensure secrecy he pointed out that it would be necessary to start by
night, and that the ships should be at once launched. To expedite
matters the whole of the Samnite troops, with the exception of those
who were mounting guard in the city, were sent down to the shore. Here
they were so crowded as to impede one another's movements and the
confusion was heightened by the darkness and the contradictory orders
which Nymphius was giving in order to gain time. Meantime Charilaus
had been admitted by his confederates into the city. When the Romans
had completely occupied the highest parts of the city, he ordered them
to raise a shout, on which the Greeks, acting on the instructions of
their leaders kept quiet. The Nolans escaped at the other end of the
city and took the road to Nola. The Samnites, shut out as they were
from the city, had less difficulty in getting away, but when once out
of danger they found themselves in a much more sorry flight. They had
no arms, there was nothing they possessed which was not left behind
with the enemy; they returned home stripped and destitute, an object
of derision not only to foreigners but even to their own countrymen. I
am quite aware that there is another view of this transaction,
according to which it was the Samnites who surrendered, but in the
above account I have followed the authorities whom I consider most
worthy of credit. Neapolis became subsequently the chief seat of the
Greek population, and the fact of a treaty being made with that city
renders it all the more probable that the re-establishment of friendly
relations was due to them. As it was generally believed that the enemy
had been forced by the siege to come to terms, a triumph was decreed
to Publilius. Two circumstances happened in connection with his
consulship which had never happened before-a prolongation of command
and a triumph after he had laid down his command." - Livy, History of
Rome 8.26


"O Jupiter Capitolinus, to You I pray, I entreat You, who the Roman
people have named Optimus after Your kindness and Maximus after Your
great power. And to You, O Juno Regina, guardian of the City of Rome.
O Minerva, You have always come to my aid with Your counsels, witness
to the existence of my works; And most especially to You, Penates, who
most of all has called me back, gods of my fathers and my family,
recalling me for the sake of your stations; And You who preside over
the City of Rome and the Republic, You I call to witness, You from
whose temple precincts and shrines did I repel the heinous and
destructive flames of impious duplicity; You also, Mother Vesta, I
pray to You, whose most chaste Vestales I have defended against
pillage and desecration by demented men; for their eternal flame I
could not allow to pass, extinguished in the blood of citizens, or
Your pure flame be intermingled with a conflagration sweeping the
entire city." - Cicero, De Domo sua ad Pontifices 144

"O Jupiter, it was through Your omen that I was led while I laid here
upon the Palatine Hill, to establish the very first foundations of the
city of Rome. Already the Arx, that fortress wickedly bought, is
seized by the Sabines, from whence they, with sword in hand, now
advance across the valley against us. But if You, Father of the Gods
and of men, hold back our enemies, at least from this spot, delivering
the Romans from their terror, and stay their shameful retreat, then
this I vow to You, Jupiter Stator, that a holy precinct and shrine
will be built in Your honor as a memorial to remind our descendents of
how once the city of Rome was saved by Your aid." - Livy, History of
Rome 1.12

Today begins a great three-day-long festival to Iuppiter, around which
the Ludi Plebii were celebrated. Iuppiter is the supreme god, also
called Iove. Originally a sky deity associated with rain and
agriculture, He developed into the great father god, prime protector
of the state, concerned, like the Greek Zeus (with whom He is
identified), with all aspects of life. At His temple on the Capitol,
triumphant generals honored Him with their spoils and magistrates paid
homage to Him with sacrifices. Iuppiter was the son of Saturn and Ops
and the brother and husband of Iuno. Some of His titles are:

1. Iuppiter Caelestis ("heavenly")
2. Iuppiter Fulgurator ("of the lightning")
3. Iuppiter Latarius ("God of Latium")
4. Iuppiter Lucetius ("of the light")
5. Iuppiter Pluvius ("sender of rain")
6. Iuppiter Stator ("who stands", from stare meaning "standing")
7. Iupiter Terminus or Jupiter Terminalus (defender of boundaries)
8. Iuppiter Tonans ("thunderer")
9. Iuppiter Victor (leading the Roman armies to victory)
10. Iuppiter Summanus (sender of nocturnal thunder)
11. Iuppiter Feretrius ("who carries away [the spoils of war]")

Iuppiter was considered as the guardian of law, and as the protector of justice and virtue: He maintained the sanctity of an oath, and presided over all transactions which were based upon faithfulness and justice. Hence Fides was His companion on the capitol, along with Victoria; and hence a traitor to his country, and persons guilty of perjury, were thrown down the Tarpeian rock. Faithfulness is manifested in the internal relations of the state, as well as in its connections with foreign powers, and in both respects Iuppiter was regarded as its protector. Not only the family, however, but all the political bodies into which the Roman people was divided, such as the gentes and curiae, were under the especial protection of the king and queen of the gods; and so was the whole body of the Roman people, that is, the Roman state itself.

The largest temple in Rome was that of Iuppiter Optimus Maximus on the
Capitoline Hill. Here He was worshipped alongside Iuno and Minerva,
forming with them the Capitoline Triad. Temples to Iuppiter Optimus
Maximus or the Capitoline Triad as a whole were commonly built by the
Romans at the center of new cities in their colonies.


Valete bene!

Cato
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81851 From: Q. Fabius Maximus Date: 2010-11-12
Subject: Re: : [Nova-Roma] Rememberance
-----Original Message-----
From: Jean-François Arnoud <jfarnoud94@...>
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thu, Nov 11, 2010 8:44 pm
Subject: Re : [Nova-Roma] Rememberance




Avete,

The father of my great mother was in the French army on the Somme River near the
Flander Fields during the 4 years of the WWI and, when I was a child, I watched
many photographs (black and white) of him and his army pals. Unfortunately his
brother in law, the brother of his wife, died in the early first days of this
war, killed by Germans in the time when French soldiers wore very colored
uniforms. I read the last letter he sent to his parents...


Salvete
That would the second Empire uniforms with blue coats and red pants. That was an imitation of Alegerian Zouave dress did you know that?
Valete

Fabius Maximus





[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81852 From: Publius Memmius Albucius Date: 2010-11-12
Subject: Curule, qu. and vigint. ELECTIONS for 2764 - CALL for CANDIDATES
CALL FOR CANDIDATES FOR THE CURULE, QUAEST. AND VIGINT. MAGISTRACIES FOR 2011
(ed. Memmium de petitione magistratuus curulium quaestorium et vigintisexvirorum 2764 auc)



In view of the various laws of Nova Roma organizing the electoral process and the conditions to lay, receive, examine and accept a candidacy ;


In view of the senatus consultum ultimum on the electoral legal system issued a.d. III Idus Nov. 2763 (Nov. 11, 2010), and authorizing the consul maior �to modify, by edictum, the current legislation relative to the electoral system of Nova Roma (tools, proceedings, etc.) in order to adapt it to the creation of an electoral system which, as simple and efficient as possible, will allow Nova Roma institutions, and specially its comitia, to go on working normally without the assistance of the current IT system.�


I, P. Memmius Albucius consul of Nova Roma,



Article 1 : hereby call for candidacies to the curule, quaestorial and vigintisexviri magistracies for next year 2764 auc. The Plebeian magistracies will be naturally the matter of a special call, issued by our Tribunes of the Plebs. The election day(s) will be set later.



Article 2 : remind that the magistrates concerned by the present call shall be elected by the Comitia Centuriata and Populi Tributa and shall enter in office on next Kalends of January (Jan. 1, 2011). The concerned magistracies are the following ones : censor (1 open position) ; consul (2 pos.), praetors (2), aediles (2), quaestors (8), rogators (2), diribitors (4).




Article 3 : remind the mandatory requirements that must be fulfilled by any candidate :


3.1. to confirm, with no ambiguity and no later than next a.d. IV Kal. Dec. 2763 (28 November 2010), 17:00 hrs Rome time, her/his intention to stand for office at the address albucius_aoe at hotmail dot com in order to be placed on the ballot. This confirmation shall include in addition :
- the word "candidate" in the subject of the message ;
- the candidate's full Nova Roman name
- the magistracy for which the candidacy is laid.


Every candidacy which would have not respected the above rules shall be considered as void.


3.2. in addition to be :
- at the present date a citizen of Nova Roma ;
- a citizen �in good standing for at least six months� before the entry in office, i.e. at least since pridie Kal. Quint. 2763 (June 30, 2010) ;
- assidu -a/us at the present date.


3.3. Every candidate running for the following magistracies shall be at least, on next Kal. Ian. 2764 auc (Jan. 1, 2011) :


- censor or consul : 27 years old ;
- praetor : 25 y.o. ;
- others : 21 y.o..


3.4. Every candidate running for CENSOR or CONSUL or PRAETOR shall have served at least, on next Kal. Ian. 2764 auc (Jan. 1, 2011), six months as one of the following magistrate : consul, praetor, aedilis, quaestor, tribunus plebis, magister aranearius, editor commentariorum, rogator, or provincial governor.




Article 4 : recommend the citizens, whose availability and motivation would not be adapted to the magistracy for which they would intend to run, to well ponder their decision before laying their candidacy, being reminded that a derelict or failing magistrate may be suspended or removed.


Article 5 � The magistrates and officers of Nova Roma are charged of the good execution of the present senatus consultum, which shall be applicable from its publication on, and be included in the Tabularium Nova Romae (Senate section).



Edictum pridie Idus Novembres P. Memmio Albucio K. Fabio Buteoni Quintiliano (II) coss. 2763 auc..


P. Memmius Albucius
cos. maior

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81853 From: Gaius Petronius Dexter Date: 2010-11-12
Subject: Call for Plebeian candidates 2763/2764 aVc.
Ex officio Tribunorum Plebis.

A call for Candidates is hereby issued for the offices of Tribuni Plebis and Aediles Plebis. The elected candidates will have their terms of office
begin AVC 2763 a.d. IV Idus Dec. (10 December 2010). Any and all Assidui Plebeian Citizens who wish to serve the Respublica and the People
for the next year shall:

( I ) declare their candidacy to the current Tribuni Plebis at the email address:
jfarnoud94ATyahooDOTfr
and
( II ) announce their intention to run for office before the Comitia Plebis Tributa:
ComitiaPlebisTributa@yahoogroups.com

Announcements of candidacy for these offices that are made to any other official Nova Roma lists are allowed but will not meet the requirements
needed to be recognized as a candidate. All who seek candidacy MUST post their announcement to the Comitia Plebis Tributa.

Eligibility Requirements:
Tribunus Plebis - (V positions available) -
Candidates must be Cives in good standing for at least six full months before taking office; members of the Plebeian Ordo, Assidui today (12
Nov. 2010), and at least 25 years of age by AUC MMDCCLXIII a.d. IV Idus Dec (10 Dec 2010).

NOTE: An exception to the age requirement can be found in the Lex Iunia de Magistratum Aetate.
Aedilis Plebis - (II positions available) -

Candidates must be Cives in good standing for at least six full months before taking office; members of the Plebeian Ordo, Assidui today (12
Nov. 2010), and at least 21 years of age by AUC MMDCCLXIII a.d. IV Idus Dec (10 Dec. 2010). Candidates for Aedilis Plebis must also have
served at least six months as a Tribunus Plebis, Quaestor, Magister Aranearius, Editor Commentariorum, or Provincial Gubenator; or that they
have served as a scribe to one of the current Aediles Plebis for at least six months.

Time Limits for Declaring Candidacy:
Announcements of candidacy before the Comitia Plebis Tributa and declaration of candidacy to the Tribuni Plebis must be received no later than
23.59 CET 25 Nov (before midnight at Rome being 6:00 p.m. EDT or 3:00 p.m. PDT, AUC MMDCCLXIII (2010 Gregorian).

NOTE: If less than the five lawfully qualified candidates for Tribunes or two lawfully qualified candidates for Plebeian Aediles have announced
their candidacies before the dead-line, then the remaining vacancies can be filled under the terms of the Lex Grylla de Securandis Magistratus
Plebis.

Datum sub manu mea pridie Idus Novembres P. Memmio Albucio K. Fabio Buteone Quintiliano iterum consulibus, anno Vrbis conditae
MMDCCLXIII.

C. Petronius Dexter
Tribunus Plebis Arcoiali scribebat
Pridie Idus Novembres P. Memmio K. Fabio II coss.

Tribuni Plebis
C. Petronius Dexter
M. Octavius Corvus
C. Aquillius Rota



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81854 From: Timothy or Stephen Gallagher Date: 2010-11-12
Subject: Coming in February
FYI

Enjoy

http://www.comingsoon.net/news/movienews.php?id=71576

Vale

Ti. Galerius Paulinus



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81855 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2010-11-12
Subject: Re: [BackAlley] Coming in February
Ave!

OK that looks pretty awesome! Thanks for posting it!

Vale,

Sulla

On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 9:10 AM, Timothy or Stephen Gallagher <
spqr753@...> wrote:

>
>
> FYI
>
> Enjoy
>
> http://www.comingsoon.net/news/movienews.php?id=71576
>
> Vale
>
> Ti. Galerius Paulinus
>
>
>
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81856 From: ndduffy1975@yahoo.com Date: 2010-11-12
Subject: Pompeii
Salvete Omnes,

Interesting two-page report on the shocking condition of Pompeii in today's Guardian. Can't supply a direct link, but if you go to guardian.co.uk it should be easy enough to find.

NDD
Sent from my BlackBerry smartphone from Virgin Media
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81857 From: Cato Date: 2010-11-13
Subject: IDIBUS NOVEMBRIBUS
Cato omnibus in foro SPD

Hodiernus dies est Idibus Novembribus; hic dies nefastus publicus est.

"This was followed almost immediately by a war with the Greeks on the
eastern coast. The Tarentines had encouraged the people of Palaeopolis
through their long resistance with vain hopes of succour, and when
they heard that the Romans had got possession of the place they
severely blamed the Palaeopolitans for leaving them in the lurch, as
though they were quite guiltless of having behaved in a similar manner
themselves. They were furious with the Romans, especially after they
found that the Lucanians and Apulians had established friendly
relations with them-for it was in this year that the alliance had been
formed-and they realised that they would be the next to be involved.
They saw that it must soon become a question of either fighting Rome
or submitting to her, and that their whole future in fact depended
upon the result of the Samnite war. That nation stood out alone, and
even their strength was inadequate for the struggle, now that the
Lucanians had abandoned them. They believed, however, that these could
still be brought back and induced to desert the Roman alliance, if
sufficient skill were shown in sowing the seeds of discord between
them. These arguments found general acceptance among a people who were
fickle and restless, and some young Lucanians, distinguished for their
unscrupulousness rather than for their sense of honour, were bribed to
make themselves tools of the war party. After scourging one another
with rods they presented themselves with their backs exposed, in the
popular Assembly, and loudly complained that after they had ventured
inside the Roman camp, they had been scourged by the consul's orders
and were within an ace of losing their heads. The affair had an ugly
look, and the visible evidence removed any suspicion of fraud. The
Assembly became greatly excited, and amidst loud shouts insisted upon
the magistrates convening the senate. When it assembled the senators
were surrounded by a crowd of spectators who clamoured for war with
Rome, whilst others went off into the country to rouse the peasantry
to arms. Even the coolest heads were carried away by the tumult of
popular feeling; a decree was passed that a fresh alliance should be
made with the Samnites, and negotiations were opened with them
accordingly. The Samnites did not feel much confidence in this sudden
and apparently groundless change of policy, and the Lucanians were
obliged to give hostages and allow the Samnites to garrison their
fortified places. Blinded by the imposition that had been practiced on
them and by their furious resentment at it, they made no difficulty
about accepting these terms. Shortly afterwards, when the authors of
the false charges had removed to Tarentum, they began to see how they
had been hoodwinked, but it was then too late, events were no longer
in their power, and nothing remained but unavailing repentance." -
Livy, History of Rome 8.27


"Vividi gaudens Feronia luco." - Vergil, Aeneid, viii.800

"His fractus ductor conuelli signa maniplis
optato laetis abitu iubet. itur in agros
diues ubi ante omnis colitur Feronia luco
et sacer umectat Flauinia rura Capenas." - Silius Italicus, Punica
XIII.83

"Circaevmque ivgum circa hunc tractum Campaniae colebatur puer
Iuppiter, qui Anxyrus dicebatur, quasi aneu xurou, id est sine
novacula, quia barbam numquam rasisset, et Iuno virgo, quae Feronia
dicebatur. Est autem fons in Campania iuxta Terracinam, quae aliquando
Anxur est dicta." - Maurus Servius Honoratus, Commentary on the Aeneid
of Vergil 7.799

"Feronia was the ancient goddess of the market-place and fairs. This
would, as a matter of course, identify her with, and make her the
patron of, all strolling characters who frequent such places. But as
she had temples in Etruria, it is possible that she was common to both
races. The ancients were at a loss where to place her among the
deities; she appears, however, to be a goddess of the earth, and
allied to Mania. But what is most important of all for my purpose is
that she was feared, and that people brought her offerings. She often
appeared as an old woman who went about begging in the country, yet
she always had a gran pulitica--that is, she was intelligent or shrewd
or very cunning in manners--and, as one would have believed, she was a
witch. All who gave her alms were very fortunate, and their affairs
prospered. And if people could give her nothing because of their
poverty, when they returned home after the sun rose (dopo chiaro) they
found abundant gifts--enough to support all the family--so that
henceforth all went well with them; but if any who were rich gave her
nothing, and had evil hearts, she cursed them...The incident of the
begging, and the elegant style and distinguished air indicate a
character like that of Juno and Ceres combined." - C.G. Leland,
"Etruscan Roman Remains in Popular Tradition", ch. III p. 55

"At or near Feronia was a celebrated temple to the goddess of that
name, which, like many ancient shrines, stood in a thick grove Lucus
Feroniae. She seems to have been identical with Proserpine, and was
worshipped by the Sabines, and Latins, as well as by the Etruscans.
Hither, on yearly festivals, pilgrims resorted in great numbers from
the surrounding country, many to perform vows and offer sacrifice
and those who were possessed with the spirit of the goddess, walked
with naked feet over heaps of burning coal and ashes, without
receiving injury and many merchants, artisans, and husbandmen,
taking advantage of the concourse, brought their goods hither for
sale, so that the market or fair held here was more splendid than any
other in Italy. From the numerous first-fruits, and other gifts
offered to the goddess, her shrine became renowned for its riches, and
was decorated with abundance of gold and silver. But it was despoiled
by Hannibal on his march through Italy. It was however maintained
till the fall of paganism in the fourth century. That the temple
itself stood on a height seems probable from the fact, mentioned by
Livy, of its being struck by lightning." - G. Dennis, "The Cities and
Cemeteries of Etruria", ch. 10

"These incidents led to his [Hannibal] withdrawal from Rome, and he
retired as far as the river Tutia, six miles distant from the City.
From there he marched to the grove of Feronia and the temple, which
was celebrated in those days for its wealth. The people of Capena and
other cities round used to bring their first-fruits and other
offerings, according to their ability, and they had also embellished
it with a considerable quantity of gold and silver. Now the temple was
despoiled of all its treasures. Great heaps of metal, where the
soldiers, struck by remorse, had thrown pieces of uncoined brass, were
found there after Hannibal's departure. All writers are agreed as to
the plundering of this temple. Coelius tell us that Hannibal diverted
his march to it while he was going from Eretum to Rome, after marching
from Amiternum by Reate and Cutiliae." - Livy, History of Rome 26.11

"After this war another arose against the Romans on the part of the
Sabine nation, the beginning and occasion of which was this. There is
a sanctuary, honoured in common by the Sabines and the Latins, that is
held in the greatest reverence and is dedicated to a goddess named
Feronia; some of those who translate the name into Greek call her
Anthophoros or "Flower Bearer," others Philostephanos or "Lover of
Garlands," and still others Persephone. To this sanctuary people used
to resort from the neighbouring cities on the appointed days of
festival, many of them performing vows and offering sacrifice to the
goddess and many with the purpose of trafficking during the festive
gathering as merchants, artisans and husbandmen; and here were held
fairs more celebrated than in any other places in Italy." - Dionysus
of Halicarnassus, Roman Antiquities 3.32


Today is the second day of the three-day festival to Iuppiter, and is
held in honor of both him and the goddess Feronia. Since Iuppiter is
a pretty well-known deity, I am focusing on Feronia. Feronia is a
difficult goddess to identify; some sources claim that she is an
aspect of Iuno, or Ceres/Persephone, or both. She is also called the
"mother of the nymphs of Campania" by Servius (Commentary on the
Aeneid, 8.564), and Varro places her in the group of Sabine goddesses
("Feronia, Minerva, Novensides, a Sabinis." - de Lingua Latina V.74).
At Rome Feronia had a grove and later a temple in the Campus Martius;
the latter is attested only in the calendars. Since her cult at Rome
is curiously placed in the middle of the Plebeian Games, it was
probably older than they were, and it could go back to a primitive
fair, as at Lucus Feroniae. It is first mentioned at Rome when
expiatory offerings were ordered by the Sibylline in 217 BC: they were
extended even to the freedwomen (libertiinae), who according to their
ability had to contribute money for a gift to Feronia, while freewomen
(matronae) contributed to Iuno Regina on the Aventine, Though perhaps
originally an agricultural goddess (she received an offering of the
first-fruits of the season at Lucus Feroniae), she appears to have
acquired a special association with freemen and granting freedom to
slaves. In explaining her name Varro also called her Libertas,
"Libertatem deam dicit, Feroniam quasi Fidoniam", and an inscription
on a seat in her temple at Terracina, where freedman received the cap
of freedom (pilleus) on their shaved heads, runs "Let the deserving
sit down as slaves and rise as freemen" ("Bene meriti servi sedeant,
surgant liberi"). It appears that at Terracina slaves could take
sanctuary at her altar: this would be a Greek rather than a Roman
custom.


This is probably also the "dies natalis" of a temple of Pietas
(Piety), since Pietas is mentioned with Fortuna Primigenia in a
inscription of the second century AD. Her temple in the Forum
Holitorium was vowed by M. Acilius Glabrio at Thermolpylae (191) and
dedicated by his son ten years later. In it was a gilded statue of the
father, the first of its kind in Rome.The temple was destroyed in 44
B.C. to make room for the Theatre of Marcellus. One aspect of Pietas
was the relationship of parent and children, and this temple was
connected with the (Greek) story of a daughter who supplied her
imprisoned father or mother with her own milk. The connection may have
arisen from the nearby Columna (Lactaria), where infants in need of
milk were brought.


Valete bene!

Cato
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81858 From: Kirsteen Wright Date: 2010-11-13
Subject: Re: Pompeii
On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 4:17 PM, <ndduffy1975@...> wrote:

> Salvete Omnes,
>
> Interesting two-page report on the shocking condition of Pompeii in today's
> Guardian. Can't supply a direct link, but if you go to guardian.co.uk it
> should be easy enough to find.
>
> Ave

Thanks for this the full link is
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2010/nov/11/the-second-fall-pompeii


It does different from the time I visited it but that was over 30 years ago.
If you look at the picture gallery one of the captions quotes the article
when it says "Many buildings only appear still to be standing thanks only to
the goodwill of the Roman gods"

It is good to know that Herculaneum isn't suffering the same problems,
although it's a lot smaller, I definitely preferred it. I think, possibly
because there were fewer tourists, you got much more sense of atmosphere. I
do hope something can be done, though it does appear a mammoth task.

Respectfully
F Lucilla Merula


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81859 From: M. Valerius Chlorus Date: 2010-11-13
Subject: Re: Call for Plebeian candidates 2763/2764 aVc.
Salvete,

- Tribunus Plebis, minimum age 25
- Audilis Plebis, minimun age 21, must have served at least 6 as
Tribunus plebis (or another office)...

How can you serve as Tribunus plebis before serving as Aedilis Plebis
when you look at the required ages?


This year I'm to busy with other things I think, maybe later I'll be
interested.

Bene valete

M.Valerius Chlorus



On 12/11/10 16:31, Gaius Petronius Dexter wrote:
>
> Ex officio Tribunorum Plebis.
>
> A call for Candidates is hereby issued for the offices of Tribuni
> Plebis and Aediles Plebis. The elected candidates will have their
> terms of office
> begin AVC 2763 a.d. IV Idus Dec. (10 December 2010). Any and all
> Assidui Plebeian Citizens who wish to serve the Respublica and the People
> for the next year shall:
>
> ( I ) declare their candidacy to the current Tribuni Plebis at the
> email address:
> jfarnoud94ATyahooDOTfr
> and
> ( II ) announce their intention to run for office before the Comitia
> Plebis Tributa:
> ComitiaPlebisTributa@yahoogroups.com
> <mailto:ComitiaPlebisTributa%40yahoogroups.com>
>
> Announcements of candidacy for these offices that are made to any
> other official Nova Roma lists are allowed but will not meet the
> requirements
> needed to be recognized as a candidate. All who seek candidacy MUST
> post their announcement to the Comitia Plebis Tributa.
>
> Eligibility Requirements:
> Tribunus Plebis - (V positions available) -
> Candidates must be Cives in good standing for at least six full months
> before taking office; members of the Plebeian Ordo, Assidui today (12
> Nov. 2010), and at least 25 years of age by AUC MMDCCLXIII a.d. IV
> Idus Dec (10 Dec 2010).
>
> NOTE: An exception to the age requirement can be found in the Lex
> Iunia de Magistratum Aetate.
> Aedilis Plebis - (II positions available) -
>
> Candidates must be Cives in good standing for at least six full months
> before taking office; members of the Plebeian Ordo, Assidui today (12
> Nov. 2010), and at least 21 years of age by AUC MMDCCLXIII a.d. IV
> Idus Dec (10 Dec. 2010). Candidates for Aedilis Plebis must also have
> served at least six months as a Tribunus Plebis, Quaestor, Magister
> Aranearius, Editor Commentariorum, or Provincial Gubenator; or that they
> have served as a scribe to one of the current Aediles Plebis for at
> least six months.
>
> Time Limits for Declaring Candidacy:
> Announcements of candidacy before the Comitia Plebis Tributa and
> declaration of candidacy to the Tribuni Plebis must be received no
> later than
> 23.59 CET 25 Nov (before midnight at Rome being 6:00 p.m. EDT or 3:00
> p.m. PDT, AUC MMDCCLXIII (2010 Gregorian).
>
> NOTE: If less than the five lawfully qualified candidates for Tribunes
> or two lawfully qualified candidates for Plebeian Aediles have announced
> their candidacies before the dead-line, then the remaining vacancies
> can be filled under the terms of the Lex Grylla de Securandis Magistratus
> Plebis.
>
> Datum sub manu mea pridie Idus Novembres P. Memmio Albucio K. Fabio
> Buteone Quintiliano iterum consulibus, anno Vrbis conditae
> MMDCCLXIII.
>
> C. Petronius Dexter
> Tribunus Plebis Arcoiali scribebat
> Pridie Idus Novembres P. Memmio K. Fabio II coss.
>
> Tribuni Plebis
> C. Petronius Dexter
> M. Octavius Corvus
> C. Aquillius Rota
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81860 From: C.Maria Caeca Date: 2010-11-13
Subject: statement of intent
C. Maria Caeca omnibus in foro S. P. D.

I have submitted to the Consul Maior my statement of intent to run for the
office of rogatrix. As I meet all stated requirements, I have no
expectation that there will be a problem, so I have chosen to announcement
that intention here, in the main forum.

Valete bene,
C. Maria Caeca
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81861 From: Gaius Tullius Valerianus Date: 2010-11-13
Subject: Announcement: Candidacy for Tribune
Avete Quirites!

I am happy to announce to you that I am running for the office of Tribune of
the Plebs for the year A.U.C. MMDCCLXIV. The events of this year have shown
all of us how necessary it is to have good tribunes to uphold the
Constitution and the laws of our Republic and to protect the people. I ask
that all plebeians vote for me! Thank you!

~ Gaius Tullius Valerianus Germanicus

*Avete Quirites!*
*
*
*Laetus vobis nuntio me petere Tribunatum pro anno A.U.C. MMDCCLXIV. Res hoc
anno factae nobis omnibus demonstraverunt quam necesse sit habere tribunos
bonos qui sustineant instituta et leges Rei Publicae nostrae defendantque
populum. Oro ut plebeii omnes mihi suffragentur. Gratias vobis ago!*
*
*
*~ Gaius Tullius Valerianus Germanicus*
*
*
*Data ex urbe Providentia Idibus Novembribus anno A.U.C. MMDCCLXIII*


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81862 From: Cato Date: 2010-11-13
Subject: Announcement: Candidacy for Consul
C. Equitius Cato omnibus in foro SPD

I hereby publicly declare my candidacy for the office of consul of the Respublica. I am happy to answer any questions any citizen might have regarding my work and intentions.

Valete,

Cato
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81863 From: mcorvvs Date: 2010-11-14
Subject: Re: Ides ritual performed by Sacerdos Iovis M.Octavius Corvus
Salvete omnes,

At Ides Nov. I, M.Octavius Corvus, Sacerdos Iovis, on behalf of People of Nova Roma performed Ides ritual for IOM on November 13, Ap. Furius Lupus assisted me.

The rite:

PRAEFATIO:
"IUPPITER OPTIME MAXIME, UTI TIBI IN ILLEIS LIBREIS SCRIPTUM EST,
QUARUMQUE RERUM ERGO, QUODQUE MELIUS SIET POPULO NOVO ROMANO QUIRITIBUS, TIBI HOC SACRUM FIAT: TE QUAESO PRECORQUE, UTI IMPERIUM MAIESTATEMQUE POPULI NOVI ROMANI QUIRITIUM AUXIS, UTIQUE INCOLUMITATEM SEMPITERNAMQUE VICTORIAM VALETUDINEMQUE POPULO NOVO ROMANO QUIRITIBUS DES, FAVEASQUE POPULO NOVO ROMANO QUIRITIBUS, REMQUE PUBLICAM LIBERAM POPULI NOVI ROMANI QUIRITIUM SALVAM SERVES, MAIOREMQUE FACIAS, UTI SIS VOLENS PROPITIUS POPULO NOVO ROMANO QUIRITIBUS, SENATUI NOVO ROMANO, SACERDOTIBUS POPULI NOVI ROMANI, NOBIS, DOMIBUS, FAMILIIS, ET UTI HUIUS SACRIFICI ACCEPTOR SIES;
HARUM RERUM ERGO MACTE ESTO FITO VOLENS PROPITIUS POPULO NOVO ROMANO
QUIRITIBUS, SENATUI NOVO ROMANO, SACERDOTIBUS NOVIS ROMANIS, NOBIS,
DOMIBUS, FAMILIIS."

PRECATIO:
"IUPPITER, QUO CIRCA TE, CAPITOLINE, QUEM PROPTER BENEFICIA POPULUS
ROMANUS OPTIMUM, PROPTER VIM MAXIMUM NOMINAVIT! IUPPITER, QUI GENUS COLIS ALISQUE HOMINEM, PER QUEM VIVIMUS VITALEM AEVOM, QUEM PENES SPES VITAE SUNT HOMINUM OMNIUM, DA DIEM HUNC SOSPITEM QUAESO MEIS REBUS AGUNDIS!"
"PATER NOSTER, IN TUA, PATER CARISSIME, IN TUA SUMUS CUSTODIA. IUPPITER, TE HOC TURE OMMOVENDO BONAS PRECES PRAECOR, UTI SIS VOLENS PROPITIUS NOBIS LIBERISQUE NOSTRIS, DOMIBUS FAMILIISQUE NOSTRIS."

- Some INCENCE put into the fire -

SACRIFICIUM:
"IUPPITER, TE HOC LIBO OBMOVENDO BONAS PRECES PRECOR, UTI SIS VOLENS
PROPITIUS NOBIS LIBERISQUE NOSTRIS, DOMIBUS FAMILIISQUE NOSTRIS, MACTUS HOC FERTO."

- LIBUM -

"IOVIS PATER, UTI TE LIBO OBMOVENDO BONAS PRECES BENE PRECATUS SUM,
EIUSDEM REI ERGO MACTE VINO INFERIO ESTO."

- WINE -
"IUPPITER OPTIME MAXIME, REX DEORUM, QUI RES PUBLICAS NOVAS ROMANAS NUNC CUSTODIS DEFENDISQUE, SICUT RES PUBLICAS MAIORUM NOSTRORUM ROMANORUM CUSTODIVISTI DEFENDISTIQUE, TIBI FIERI OPORTET IN HOC TEMPORE INITII CULIGNAM VINI DAPI, EIUS REI ERGO HAC ILLACE DAPE PULLUCENDA ESTO."

- WINE -

ILICET. DI IMMORTALES FACIANT, TAM FELIX QUAM PIA.

Rite was performed at the altar of Iuppiter in Poltava, Sarmatia Prov..
Sacrifice was: incense, libum, wine.
No birds movement was detected.

Valete bene,

CORVVS
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81864 From: C.Maria Caeca Date: 2010-11-14
Subject: more conventus stuff
I originally posted this on Seneca's facebook prototype site, where I tend
to post most things, now ...but decided to post it here, as well.

During our conventus, we held a ceremonia that will always be precious to
me, not because it was spectacular or showy, it was neither, nor because it
was a presentation to the public, it was private, even familial, nor because
I can vouch for the authenticity of each and every element, including the
prayers that were used. I believe that most elements were, because I know
the priests who constructed this ceremonia, and certainly if anything was
added or created, it was done most carefully and in the spirit of
reconstructing it as accurately as they could: but because, first, this was
the first time I was a participant (holding the paper on which the text was
written does count, smile), because of its simple, intrinsic beauty, and
because, in a way, it was our gift to the Rota family.

We conducted a toga virilis ceremonia for Rota's eldest son, Marcus
Equitius. It was a simple ritual, in which prayers were offered to the
gods, his toga praetexta was removed by his parents, sacrifices were made,
the bulla was placed on the altar (and retrieved later, so that it could
become a family treasure), and he was dressed in his toga virilis, thanks
was given, and he was introduced to the "community" ...us. All the Novi
Romani there participated in some way, and little Trianus, the youngest son,
and a friend of the family were invited guests. No, no videos were made,
though there were some pictures, so no, you won't see this on U-tube.
However, what we did, we did to honor our gods and this dear family, and, in
so doing, in some alchemical way, we solidified our entire community,
honored a rite of passage for a very very fine young man, and participated
in a gift of love to our hosts, who had been so incredibly kind and caring
of us ...in other words, we drew together the strands of the sacred and the
profane in, I believe, the best possible way. Did we make a huge change in
anything? Well, no ...but, on the other hand, I don't think anything will
be exactly the same again, at least not for me. If nothing else, what we
did drew me, in a way I cannot explain, even more closely to my res Publica,
and has become one of the many gentle bonds that will keep me here.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81865 From: QFabiusMaxmi@aol.com Date: 2010-11-14
Subject: Re: Announcement: Candidacy for Praetor
Q. Fabius Maximus SPD
Quirites!

I am declare to you all that I will stand for the office of Praetor of our
Republic.
Too long a misguided rule of law system that was intended to be used when
the republic was more of physical presence and not just an internet one has
plagued us. I intend to simplify the process and make it tied to internet
law rather then Roman Physical Laws. When, the Gods be willing, Nova
Roma will have physical unity with our 108 acres, we can then return to a more
physical environment including our law system.
I am an 12 Veteran of Nova Roma, and I have studied Rome since an
undergrad in College.
I am prepared to commit as many hours as it takes this next year. I have
no current film commitments for the year 2011, and I will not take on any
if you elect me.

Valete





[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81866 From: David Kling Date: 2010-11-14
Subject: Re: Announcement: Candidacy for Praetor
Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus Q. Fabio Maximo salutem dicit

Our legal system is very much in need of reform. Every case in Nova Roma
has caused more bitterness than justice and has done little to bring people
together -- the opposite is the case. Whoever is elected praetor, whether
it be you or someone else, should invest time and effort to devise a system
of law that will bring the citizens together and promote cooperation rather
than division.

Vale;

Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus

On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 5:53 AM, <QFabiusMaxmi@...> wrote:

>
>
> Q. Fabius Maximus SPD
> Quirites!
>
> I am declare to you all that I will stand for the office of Praetor of our
> Republic.
> Too long a misguided rule of law system that was intended to be used when
> the republic was more of physical presence and not just an internet one has
>
> plagued us. I intend to simplify the process and make it tied to internet
> law rather then Roman Physical Laws. When, the Gods be willing, Nova
> Roma will have physical unity with our 108 acres, we can then return to a
> more
> physical environment including our law system.
> I am an 12 Veteran of Nova Roma, and I have studied Rome since an
> undergrad in College.
> I am prepared to commit as many hours as it takes this next year. I have
> no current film commitments for the year 2011, and I will not take on any
> if you elect me.
>
> Valete
>
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81867 From: Cato Date: 2010-11-14
Subject: a.d. XVIII Kal. Dec.
Cato omnibus in foro SPD

Hodiernus dies est ante diem XVIII Idus Decembris; hic dies fastus aterque est.

"This year [326 B.C.] was marked by the dawn, as it were, of a new era
of liberty for the plebs; creditors were no longer allowed to attach
the persons of their debtors. This change in the law was brought about
by a signal instance of lust and cruelty upon the part of a
moneylender. L. Papirius was the man in question. C. Publilius had
pledged his person to him for a debt which his father had contracted.
The youth and beauty of the debtor which ought to have called forth
feelings of compassion only acted as incentives to lust and insult.
Finding that his infamous proposals only filled the youth with horror
and loathing, the man reminded him that he was absolutely in his power
and sought to terrify him by threats. As these failed to crush the
boy's noble instincts, he ordered him to be stripped and beaten.
Mangled and bleeding the boy rushed into the street and loudly
complained of the usurer's lust and brutality. A vast crowd gathered,
and on learning what had happened became furious at the outrage
offered to one of such tender years, reminding them as it did of the
conditions under which they and their children were living. They ran
into the Forum and from there in a compact body to the Senate-house.
In face of this sudden outbreak the consuls felt it necessary to
convene a meeting of the senate at once, and as the members entered
the House the crowd exhibited the lacerated back of the youth and
flung themselves at the feet of the senators as they passed in one by
one. The strongest bond and support of credit was there and then
overthrown through the mad excesses of one individual. The consuls
were instructed by the senate to lay before the people a proposal
"that no man be kept in irons or in the stocks, except such as have
been guilty of some crime, and then only till they have worked out
their sentence; and, further, that the goods and not the person of the
debtor shall be the security for the debt." So the nexi were released,
and it was forbidden for any to become nexi in the future." - Livy,
History of Rome 8.28


Today is the last day of the three day festival in honor of Iuppiter
Optimus Maximus around which the Ludi Plebii were celebrated.

Iuppiter overthew his father, Saturn (in Greek, Kronos). He then drew
lots with his brothers Poseidon and Hades to determine who would be
the supreme ruler of the gods. Iuppiter won the draw and became the
ruler of Olympus and the patron of the ancient Roman state. Iuppiter
was the rain god and lord of the sky, making His name an appropriate
one for the king of the planets. His weapon is a thunderbolt which He
hurls at those who displease Him. He is married to Iuno but is famous
for His many affairs, among which are:

IO

Io was a river nymph whose beauty attracted Iuppiter, and he seduced
her. Hoping to hide his affair from the eyes of his wife Iuno,
Iuppiter covered the world with a thick blanket of clouds. Iuno wasn't
that stupid. The cloudbank aroused her suspicions so she came down to
Earth from Mount Olympus and started dispersing the clouds.

When Iuppiter realized that Iuno was about to find him and Io, he
quickly changed Io into a cow. All that Iuno found was Iuppiter
innocently standing next to a white cow, swearing that he had never
seen the cow before, that it had suddenly appeared out of the Earth.
Iuno admired the cow, and asked Iuppiter if she could have it as a
present. Iuppiter had little choice but to agree. Iuppiter and Iuno
then began a little game of "play with the cow". First, Iuno sent Io
the cow away under a guard. Iuppiter arranged for Io to be rescued and
set free. Next, Iuno set a gadfly to torment and sting Io, a terrible
torture for a cow. Io tried desperately to escape the gadfly, and
ended up wandering around the world. Her wanderings are commemorated
in several familiar place-names: the sea that Io swam across is named
after her (the Ionian Sea), as is the Bosporus strait (which
translates to "fording of the ox." ). Io eventually found her way to
Egypt, where, after Iuppiter promised to no longer pursue her, Iuno
returned her to human form.


EUROPA

"Majesty and love go ill together, nor can they long share one abode.
Abandoning the dignity of his sceptre, the father and ruler of the
gods, whose hand wields the flaming three-forked bolt, whose nod
shakes the universe, adopted the guise of a bull; and mingling with
the other bullocks, joined in their lowing and ambled in the tender
grass, a fair sight to see. His hide was white as untrodden snow, snow
not yet melted by the rainy South wind. The muscles stood out on his
neck, and deep folds of skin hung along his flanks. His horns were
small, it is true, but so beautifully made that you would swear they
were the work of an artist, more polished and shining than any jewel.
There was no menace in the set of his head or in his eyes; he looked
completely placid." - Ovid, Metamorphoses II.847-858

The story of Europa and Iuppiter begins with a dream. A Phoenician
princess, Europa dreamt that two continents, Asia and an Unnamed
place, were arguing over her: Asia said that Europa belonged to Asia
since she had been born there, but the Unnamed continent claimed that
one day Iuppiter would make it a present to Europa.

The next morning, Europa went with a group of young ladies down to the
sea to gather flowers and seashells, and Iuppiter happened to see hem.
Struck by Europa's beauty, yet knowing his fairly lecherous
reputation *and* afraid of Iuno's wrath, he disguised himself as a
pure white bull with a sweet fragrance and a lovely "moo". Naturally,
all the young maidens were delighted with this magically gentle
creature.

Iuppiter then lay down in front of Europa, mooing sweetly and gazing
at her with his cow eyes --- how could she resist? She climbed up on
his back, expecting a short trot along the beach. Instead, the bull
charged off and plunged into the sea, swimming rapidly away from the
shore. As they went, gradually a whole line-up of lesser gods began
to follow, and Europa began to get the hint that the bull was
something more than a bull. She begged the bull to bring her home,
but Iuppiter, revealing who he was, told her that he was madly in love
with her and was taking her to Crete, to enjoy her company out of
sight of Iuno (he was apparently oblivious to the crowd of gods
trailing behind them).

Once they reached Crete, Iuppiter cast off his bull disguise, flinging
it into the heavens, where it took the form of the constellation
Taurus. They dallied on Crete, and Europa eventually gave birth to
three sons, the most famous of whom was Minos, the ancestor of the
Minoan people, the first European civilization. For reasons that are
never explained, Iuno seemed to remain in the dark about Europa, and
never punished the young girl.

GANYMEDE

"The king of the gods was once fired with love for Phrygian Ganymede,
and when that happened Jupiter found another shape preferable to his
own. Wishing to turn himself into a bird, he none the less scorned to
change into any save that which can carry his thunderbolts. Then
without delay, beating the air on borrowed pinions, he snatched away
the shepherd of Ilium, who even now mixes the winecups, and supplies
Jove with nectar, to the annoyance of Juno" - Ovid, Metamorphoses
X.154-160

Iuppiter was drifting around one day and spied Ganymede, the most
beautiful Trojan man ever born, playing on Mount Ida in Crete.
Iuppiter turned himself into an eagle, and grabbed Ganymede and
brought him to heaven, where he made him the cup-bearer of the gods
--- a post which had previously been held by Iuppiter's daughter Hebe.
Iuno, furious at both Iuppiter for dumping Hebe in favor of this
beautiful man *and* at Ganymede for...well, being so beautiful, began
to make very ugly noises. Iuppiter, to preserve Ganymede intact,
tossed him into the heavens where he became the constellation
Aquarius, the Water-Bearer.

Another version of the story is that Iuppiter saw Ganymede with Eos,
the goddess of the dawn, and demanded that she give Ganymede to him;
in return, Iuppiter granted Eos' wish that her current lover,
Tithonius, be made immortal. Unfortunately, Eos and Tithonius forgot
to ask hat he remain *youthful* as well, and after watching Tithonius
gradually get older and older, shriveling up in extreme old age, Eos
got bored and locked him in a room by himself, where he eventually
became just a disembodied voice.

When Ganymede's father Tros (king of either Troy or Laedemon,
depending on the version) found out that Ganymede had disappeared, he
was so upset that Iuppiter sent him two horses that could ride over
water, creating storms in their wake. These are the same two horses
that Hercules later demanded as payment for killing the sea-monster
that Neptune had sent to plague the city of Troy.

CALLISTO

"Jupiter caught sight of her and immediately desired her. He took on
the shape of the goddess Diana and spoke to Callisto, who was
delighted to see the form of her mistress. She began to tell him of
her hunting exploits, and he responded by raping her. She resisted him
as far as a woman could --- had Juno seen her she would have been less
cruel --- but how could a girl overcome a man, and who could defeat
Jupiter? He had his way, and returned to the upper air" - Ovid,
Metamorphoses II.434-437

The nymph Callisto was a favorite companion of the virgin goddess
Diana. Callisto had vowed to remain chaste, and to follow in the ways
of Diana. She accompanied Diana while hunting and was her constant
companion. Iuppiter caught a glimpse of the beautiful Callisto and, of
course, fell in love with her. Knowing that Diana had warned Callisto
of the deceitful ways of men and gods, Iuppiter cleverly disguised
himself as --- Diana. He then seduced Callisto, and Callisto
conceived a child (I'm not exactly sure when Callisto realized that
the person she was messing around with wasn't Diana, but it didn't
stop her in the end, apparently).

When Callisto's condition was revealed to Diana by jealous competitors
for Diana's attentions, Callisto was forced out of her company. She
bore a boy child named Arcas. When Iuppiter's wife Juno saw this
evidence of Iuppiter's infidelity she became enraged, and changed
Callisto into a bear. Callisto was ashamed and afraid, and fled into
the woods, not to see her son for many years.

One day, when Callisto's son Arcas was a young man, he decided to go
hunting, and went into the woods where his mother Callisto lived.
Callisto saw her son, whom she had not seen for many years. She forgot
she was a bear, and rushed forward to embrace her son. Arcas only saw
a bear rushing down on him. He lifted his bow and shot an arrow at the
beast. At the last moment Iuppiter intervened and placed Callisto and
her son in the heavens as the constellations Ursa Major and Ursa
Minor, the big and little bears.


Valete bene!

Cato
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81868 From: Publius Memmius Albucius Date: 2010-11-14
Subject: LIST of our ASSIDUI - Update of pr. Idus Nov. 2763 (11-12, 2010)
Consul P. Memmius Albucius omnibus civibus s.d.

You will find here, at the link below, updated on this Nov. 12nd, the list of the 139 NR Inc. members who paid their fees for 2010 (�list of the assidui etc.� or "album assiduorum" under our Roman Law):

http://www.novaroma.org/nr/Nova_Roman_taxpayers_2763_AUC_%28Nova_Roma%29

This table was built thanks the informations left on the financial software managed, before her resignation on last August 6, by NR Inc former treasurer Eq. Iunia Laeca.
The track of a few payments may be "lost", either because they could not, for a reason or another, be inserted in this software, or made after our former CFO has stopped filling this table, or since her resignation, or for any other possible reason.

As usual, please check this list and react asap, specially if ever your Roman name were not included in it and that you had, however, paid your fee 2010, either directly or through your governor or a third person.
Contact me directly.

If no valid correction (evidence of a payment at worst on this pridie Idus Nov. 2763) may be recorded from now on til next Nov. 15, 2010, the list linked above shall be considered as the definitive one for Nov. 12, 2010, specially within the framework of our annual
elections (admissibility of the candidates).

Good checking and valete omnes,


P. Memmius Albucius
consul

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81869 From: Publius Memmius Albucius Date: 2010-11-14
Subject: Certificate - Provinces Britannia and California
Omnibus s.d.

In order that the two recently appointed governors (by the recent Senate session Nov. 4-11) may begin to work with no delay, the present lines officially witness that Hon. G. Marcius Crispus and Q. Fabius Maximus are, since last Nov. 11, 2010, governors of, respectively, the provinces of Britannia and California. The appointment senatus consultum may be found here below.

Done to be worth for every possible legal use.


pridie Idus Nov. 2763 auc.


P. Memmius Albucius cos.

________________________________

Item X � Provinces � Appointment of governors � Britannia

In view of the report brought by Consul Memmius, the Senate of Rome decides:

Article 1 : G. Marcius Crispus shall be appointed, from this day on and until the senatorial appointment review scheduled, in the present state of Nova Roma Law, in March 2765 auc, governor (legatus pro praetore) of the province of Britannia.

Article 2 � The consuls, censors and praetors of Nova Roma are charged of the good execution of the present senatus consultum, which shall be applicable from its publication on, and be included in the Tabularium Nova Romae (Senate section).

______________________________________________

Item XI � Provinces � Appointment of governors � California

In view of the report presented by Consul Memmius, the Senate of Rome decides:

Article 1 : Q. Fabius Maximus shall be appointed, from this day on and until the senatorial appointment review scheduled, in the present state of Nova Roma Law, in March 2765 auc, governor (proconsul) of the province of California.

Article 2 � The consuls, censors and praetors of Nova Roma are charged of the good execution of the present senatus consultum, which shall be applicable from its publication on, and be included in the Tabularium Nova Romae (Senate section).

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81870 From: David Kling Date: 2010-11-14
Subject: Re: Certificate - Provinces Britannia and California
Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus S.P.D.

Congratulations to G. Marcius Crispus and Q. Fabius Maximus for their
recent appointments as provincial governors.

Vale;

Modianus

On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 8:54 AM, Publius Memmius Albucius <
albucius_aoe@...> wrote:

>
> Omnibus s.d.
>
> In order that the two recently appointed governors (by the recent Senate
> session Nov. 4-11) may begin to work with no delay, the present lines
> officially witness that Hon. G. Marcius Crispus and Q. Fabius Maximus are,
> since last Nov. 11, 2010, governors of, respectively, the provinces of
> Britannia and California. The appointment senatus consultum may be found
> here below.
>
> Done to be worth for every possible legal use.
>
>
> pridie Idus Nov. 2763 auc.
>
>
> P. Memmius Albucius cos.
>
> ________________________________
>
> Item X � Provinces � Appointment of governors � Britannia
>
> In view of the report brought by Consul Memmius, the Senate of Rome
> decides:
>
> Article 1 : G. Marcius Crispus shall be appointed, from this day on and
> until the senatorial appointment review scheduled, in the present state of
> Nova Roma Law, in March 2765 auc, governor (legatus pro praetore) of the
> province of Britannia.
>
> Article 2 � The consuls, censors and praetors of Nova Roma are charged of
> the good execution of the present senatus consultum, which shall be
> applicable from its publication on, and be included in the Tabularium Nova
> Romae (Senate section).
>
> ______________________________________________
>
> Item XI � Provinces � Appointment of governors � California
>
> In view of the report presented by Consul Memmius, the Senate of Rome
> decides:
>
> Article 1 : Q. Fabius Maximus shall be appointed, from this day on and
> until the senatorial appointment review scheduled, in the present state of
> Nova Roma Law, in March 2765 auc, governor (proconsul) of the province of
> California.
>
> Article 2 � The consuls, censors and praetors of Nova Roma are charged of
> the good execution of the present senatus consultum, which shall be
> applicable from its publication on, and be included in the Tabularium Nova
> Romae (Senate section).


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81871 From: GAIUS MARCIUS CRISPUS Date: 2010-11-14
Subject: Re: Certificate - Provinces Britannia and California
--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, David Kling <tau.athanasios@...> wrote:
>
> Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus S.P.D.
>
> Congratulations to G. Marcius Crispus and Q. Fabius Maximus for their recent appointments as provincial governors.
>
> Vale;
>
> Modianus


Salvete omnes

First I should like to express my sincere thanks to Albucius Cos, and to the members of the Senate, for the trust they have reposed in me. I thank Hon Modianus for his kind greetings and generous good wishes. I pledge myself to a faithful and active effort to perform the duties of that office.

Following this official announcement, I intend to establish contact with all citizens of Britannia. I am working to update the Provincial mailing list, and will send that message as soon as that is done.

In the meantime, all citizens of the Province are invited to contact me at the following email address so that we may begin to plan how best to restore the fortunes of this once great Province.

My address is

jbshr1pwa@...

May the Gods look favourably on our efforts.

Valete optime
G Marcius Crispus
Britannia.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81872 From: Kirsteen Wright Date: 2010-11-14
Subject: Re: Certificate - Provinces Britannia and California
On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 2:07 PM, David Kling <tau.athanasios@...>wrote:

> Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus S.P.D.
>
> Congratulations to G. Marcius Crispus and Q. Fabius Maximus for their
> recent appointments as provincial governors.
>
>
Ave

Congratulations to both Governors but especially to G Marcius Crispus. It's
really nice to know we have a governor again here in Britannia.

Respectfully
F Lucilla Merula


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81873 From: GAIUS MARCIUS CRISPUS Date: 2010-11-14
Subject: Re: Certificate - Provinces Britannia and California
--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Kirsteen Wright <kirsteen.falconsfan@...> wrote:

> Ave
>
> Congratulations to both Governors but especially to G Marcius Crispus. It's > really nice to know we have a governor again here in Britannia.
>
> Respectfully
> F Lucilla Merula


Salve Merula, et salvete omnes

Thank you Merula.

I'm glad to have your support.

Vale, et valete optime
Crispus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81874 From: Gnaeus Iulius Caesar Date: 2010-11-14
Subject: Candidate for Praetor
Cn Iulius Caesar sal.

I announce my intention to stand for Praetor.

There are potentially three main challenges facing any praetor. Firstly the somewhat confused nature of the wording of some of our laws and the constitutuion. Secondly, dealing with potential trials under the current legal system. Thirdly, moderating this forum.

The first, wording of laws and constitution, requires a collaborative effort on the part of consuls, praetors and other magistrates and senate. I am currently appointed to the senatorial committee on reviewing the bylaws of Nova Roma. I have macronational experience through my job in preparing and reviewing provincial legislation.

The second, sadly, is somewhat of a feature of Nova Roman life. Until such time as the process for trials and prosecutions is changed, the system has to be adminstered in a fair and effecient manner. That means conducting any trial according to the law of Nova Roma as it is written. I have assisted the advocatus in one trial and have first hand experience of the pitfalls and risks of deviating from following the written law. Hoever potential litigants should be aware that if elected I will make the responsibility of the person commencing the prosecution to work hard to just get his or her case accepted, and I will encourage alternative remedies and offer to mediate or arbitrate a dispute outside of a formal trial process, if all parties agree to it.

Lastly, the moderation of this forum. This has proved, to say the least, an explosive issue at times. My stand is simple. The constitution and laws of Nova Roma limit a praetor to only moderate or remove posting rights when a clear and imminent danger exists. Most times posts that are explosive don't risk destroying Nova Roma. I think we need far less restriction, more trust, and we also need to stop taking a rather patronizing attitude that some people inherently can't be trusted and have to be moderated for eternity. That is a sentiment I have heard over the years, and I simply don't accept it. If someone crosses the line by swearing, making threats or other wording which either breaches Yahoo TOS, Nova Roman law, or since Yahoo operates in the US, federal US law, then I will deal with it. Posting objections to my actions, other magistrates, the senate, does not constitute a threat to Nova Roma. Being held to be annoying and irritating isn't an
offence, fortunately since many of the regular posters (myself included) would be on moderation.

Good fortune to all candidates and success in office to those that win.

Optime valete.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81875 From: Timothy or Stephen Gallagher Date: 2010-11-14
Subject: FW: [Explorator] explorator 13.30
Salevete

FYI

Valete

Ti. Galerius Paulinus



To: explorator@yahoogroups.com; BRITARCH@...
From: rogueclassicist@...
Date: Sun, 14 Nov 2010 08:08:03 -0500
Subject: [Explorator] explorator 13.30






================================================================
explorator 13.30 November 14, 2010
================================================================
Editor's note: Most urls should be active for at least eight
hours from the time of publication.

For your computer's protection, Explorator is sent in plain text
and NEVER has attachments. Be suspicious of any Explorator which
arrives otherwise!!!

================================================================
================================================================
Thanks to Arthur Shippee, Dave Sowdon, David Critchley,
Diana Wright, Feral Boy,Edward Rockstein, Rick Heli, Joanne Conman,
Kurt Theis, John McMahon, Barnea Selavan, Joseph Lauer, Mike Ruggeri,
Richard Campbell,Richard C. Griffiths,and Ross W. Sargent for headses
upses this week (as always hoping I have left no one out).
================================================================
EARLY HUMANS
================================================================
On the similarity between Neanderthal and human brains at birth:

http://www.latimes.com/news/science/la-sci-neanderthal-brains-20101113,0,6046629.story
http://www.physorg.com/news/2010-11-differences-human-neanderthal-brains-birth.html
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/wirecopy/8118477/Babies-brains-resemble-those-of-Neanderthals.html
http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80beats/2010/11/09/studying-neanderthal-brain-development-one-indirect-ct-scan-at-a-time/
http://uk.news.yahoo.com/21/20101113/tsc-new-born-brains-like-neanderthals-4b158bc.html

cf: http://www.alphagalileo.org/ViewItem.aspx?ItemId=89294&CultureCode=en

Not sure we've mentioned these paleolithic flax fibres from the Republic of
Georgia:

http://www.scientificamerican.com/blog/post.cfm?id=colorful-32000-year-old-fibers-prov-2009-09-10

I think we've had this 'burial story' associated with Otzi before:

http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=the-icemans-last-stand

================================================================
ANCIENT NEAR EAST AND EGYPT
================================================================
A pharaonic inscription from Saudi Arabia:

http://arabnews.com/saudiarabia/article182756.ece
http://weekly.ahram.org.eg/2010/1023/eg42.htm
http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE6A730T20101108
http://www.news.com.au/breaking-news/saudis-uncover-first-pharaoh-artefact-signed-by-king-ramses-iii/story-e6frfku0-1225949270333
http://english.peopledaily.com.cn/90001/90777/90851/7191489.html
http://www.saudigazette.com.sa/index.cfm?method=home.con&contentid=2010110886980
http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/babylonbeyond/2010/11/saudi-arabia-history-archeology-islam.html

The ancient Egyptians apparently kept a close eye on the Big Dipper:

http://www.newkerala.com/news/world/fullnews-81645.html
http://www.newkerala.com/news/world/fullnews-80736.html

Neolithic finds from Tal al-Abar (Syria):

http://www.sana.sy/eng/35/2010/11/10/318470.htm

Storage facilities dating to the 2nd millennium B.C./B.C.E from Swaida:

http://www.sana.sy/eng/35/2010/11/13/318603.htm
http://www.english.globalarabnetwork.com/201011118016/Related-news-from-Syria/archaeologists-3-stores-dating-back-to-second-millennium-bc-unearthed-in-syria.html

Byzantine remains from Jericho:

http://english.ruvr.ru/2010/11/10/33185119.html

What Aren Maeir is up to:

http://www.news-leader.com/article/20101113/LIFE07/11130314/Digging-the-Bible

The Guardian's Guide to the Ancient World for Mesopotamia:

http://www.guardian.co.uk/culture/2010/nov/10/ancient-world-mesopotamia

The Rachel's Tomb controversy continues:

http://www.jpost.com/Israel/Article.aspx?id=194529
http://www.jpost.com/Israel/Article.aspx?id=194533

There's a translation of the *Revelation of the Magi*:

http://www.aina.org/ata/20101028215238.htm

More on sun worship at Amarna:

http://www.newkerala.com/news/world/fullnews-79095.html
http://www.chicagomaroon.com/2010/11/5/egyptian-burial-site-shows-evidence-of-sun-worship-prof-says

Egyptology News Blog:

http://egyptology.blogspot.com/

Egyptology Blog:

http://www.egyptologyblog.co.uk/

Dr Leen Ritmeyer's Blog:

http://blog.ritmeyer.com/

Paleojudaica:

http://paleojudaica.blogspot.com/

Persepolis Fortification Archives:

http://persepolistablets.blogspot.com/

Archaeologist at Large:

http://spaces.msn.com/members/ArchaeologyinEgypt/
================================================================
ANCIENT GREECE AND ROME (AND CLASSICS)
================================================================
The Temple of Venus and Rome has (finally) reopened to the public:

http://www.ansa.it/web/notizie/rubriche/english/2010/11/12/visualizza_new.html_1702023788.html
http://www.timesofmalta.com/articles/view/20101113/world-news/ancient-rome-s-biggest-temple-reopens-after-nearly-30-years
http://newsinfo.inquirer.net/breakingnews/world/view/20101112-302834/Ancient-Romes-biggest-temple-reopens
http://www.brisbanetimes.com.au/travel/travel-news/ancient-romes-biggest-temple-reopens-to-tourists-20101112-17q4i.html
http://news.smh.com.au/breaking-news-world/ancient-romes-biggest-temple-reopens-20101112-17po2.html
http://www.straitstimes.com/BreakingNews/World/Story/STIStory_601861.html
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/world/news/article.cfm?c_id=2&objectid=10686735&ref=rss
http://www.chicagotribune.com/travel/sns-ap-eu-travel-italy-falling-apart,0,6287369.story
http://www.euronews.net/2010/11/10/roman-ruins-could-see-berlusconi-fall/
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/italy/8126766/Temple-of-Venus-and-Roma-opens-in-Rome-after-26-year-restoration.html
http://artsbeat.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/11/11/ancient-roman-shrine-restored-reopens-to-public/

Bulgarian archaeologists are poking around a sanctuary older than Peperikon:

http://www.novinite.com/view_news.php?id=121967

The scaffolding is back up on the Propylaea:

http://www.independent.co.uk/travel/news-and-advice/greeces-acropolis-in-scaffolds-as-restoration-resumes-2133148.html

This week featured quite a few reactions to the collapse of the 'House of
the Gladiators':

http://news.discovery.com/archaeology/ancient-monuments-prone-to-collapse.html
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2010/nov/07/pompeii-building-collapse-italian-government
http://www.chicagotribune.com/travel/ct-italys-wonders-link,0,1331604.storylink?track=rss
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/gallery/2010/nov/11/pompeii-ruins-archaeology-italy
http://www.canoe.ca/Travel/News/2010/11/12/16108051-reuters.html
http://slatest.slate.com/id/2274698/
http://af.reuters.com/article/worldNews/idAFTRE6AA55Z20101111
http://www.google.com/hostednews/afp/article/ALeqM5j4OxDaV3F4iAWIXJNWUmvMBGAFRw?docId=CNG.56d1f55752a2aab0626aee89d327544b.121
http://www.allheadlinenews.com/articles/7020503003?Italian%20Culture%20Minister%20Blames%20Management%20For%20Pompeii%20House%20Collapse
http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSLDE6A91M120101110
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2010-11-10/more-buildings-in-ancient-pompeii-risk-collapsing-italian-minister-says.html
http://www.newkerala.com/news/world/fullnews-80455.html
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20101110/ap_on_re_eu/eu_italy_falling_apart_5
http://www.google.com/hostednews/canadianpress/article/ALeqM5hydZ2Bzu12lZosY84XQYMRX2g73Q?docId=5082448
http://www.ajc.com/travel/italys-ancient-wonders-crumble-734944.html
http://edition.cnn.com/2010/WORLD/europe/11/08/pompeii.house.gladiators.collapse/
http://news.theage.com.au/breaking-news-world/italys-ancient-monuments-risk-collapse-experts-warn-20101109-17krh.html
http://www.news24.com/SciTech/News/More-Pompeii-buildings-may-collapse-20101107
http://www.latimes.com/news/science/wire/sns-ap-eu-italy-pompeii,0,5495133.story
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/italy/8115830/Pompeii-ruin-collapses-amid-claims-site-mismanaged.html
http://www.nydailynews.com/news/world/2010/11/07/2010-11-07_ancient_pompeii_gladiators_locker_room_collapses_italians_angered_by_neglect_of_.html
http://www.thespec.com/news/world/article/274045--more-building-collapses-inevitable-at-pompeii
http://www.gulf-times.com/site/topics/article.asp?cu_no=2&item_no=397163&version=1&template_id=39&parent_id=21
http://www.stuff.co.nz/world/europe/4319286/More-Pompeii-treasures-at-risk
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/world/news/article.cfm?c_id=2&objectid=10686169&ref=rss
http://www.stuff.co.nz/travel/international/4319286/Pompeii-the-collapse-of-shame
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20101107/ap_on_sc/eu_italy_pompeii
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-11727021
http://www.ajc.com/news/nation-world/italy-more-building-collapses-729465.html
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/40093020/ns/technology_and_science-science/

Pondering who will pay:

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/italy/8131232/Who-will-pay-for-Pompeii.html

In case you missed the initial story:

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/roman-gladiators-house-collapses-2128046.html
http://www.brisbanetimes.com.au/travel/travel-news/pompeiis-2000yearold-house-of-gladiators-collapses-20101108-17jk5.html

... meanwhile, the government is proposing cuts to museums:

http://www.gulf-times.com/site/topics/article.asp?cu_no=2&item_no=398278&version=1&template_id=39&parent_id=21

... and there were privatization concerns:

http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/2010/nov/08/privatise-pompeii-italian-ruins

... and Mary Beard has some comments:

http://timesonline.typepad.com/dons_life/2010/11/the-house-of-the-gladiators-at-pompeii.html

The search for Boudicca's last battlefield:

http://www.britarch.ac.uk/ba/ba114/feat3.shtml

Greek theaters seen from the sky:

http://blogs.getty.edu/iris/ancient-greek-theaters-seen-from-the-sky/

Tom Holland on the 'good' side of the Roman Empire:

http://www.guardian.co.uk/culture/2010/nov/08/ancient-world-rome

Taking Latin 'to town':

http://www.news-gazette.com/news/education/2010-11-07/found-translation-teacher-taking-latin-town.html

Following a Roman soldier on Twitter:

http://www.thewestmorlandgazette.co.uk/news/8625641.Cumbria_pupils_to_follow_Roman_soldier_on_Twitter/

How the Greeks honoured their war dead:

http://www.winnipegfreepress.com/local/how-ancient-greeks-honoured-heroes-107020498.html

What Catherine Edwards is up to:

http://www.24dash.com/news/education/2010-11-10-Elite-Romans-of-the-Early-Empire

That Roman 'Swiss Army Knife' is making the rounds again:

http://www.wired.com/gadgetlab/2010/11/2000-year-old-roman-multi-tool/

cf:
http://www.fitzmuseum.cam.ac.uk/opac/search/cataloguedetail.html?_function_=xslt&_limit_=10&priref=70534

Reviews of Schiff's Cleo book:

http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/arts/books/cleopatra-a-life-by-stacy-schiff/article1796552/
http://www.philly.com/philly/entertainment/20101109__Cleopatra__A_Life__by_Stacy_Schiff__A_clearer_Cleo.html

and reviewish:

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/stacy-schiff/cleopatra-images-wrong_b_781099.html
http://blogs.wsj.com/speakeasy/2010/11/08/cleopatra-author-stacy-schiff-on-her-books-saucy-tone-angelina-jolies-potential-casting/

Followup to claims that the Romans were more energy efficient than we are:

http://blogs.ft.com/energy-source/2010/11/04/were-the-romans-more-energy-efficient-than-we-are/

More on the exotic origins of those decapitated 'gladiators':

http://io9.com/5683616/headless-gladiators-came-from-all-over-europe-to-get-their-heads-cut-off

More on the Pompeii donkey:

http://www.thelocal.de/sci-tech/20101114-31163.html

Latest reviews from Scholia:

http://www.classics.ukzn.ac.za/reviews/

Latest reviews from BMCR:

http://bmcr.brynmawr.edu/recent.html

Visit our blog:

http://rogueclassicism.com/
================================================================
EUROPE AND THE UK (+ Ireland)
================================================================
Items from Mesolithic Monmouth:

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-wales-11710978

On the DNA front, early Neolithic Farmers in Germany had Near Eastern links:

http://www.uni-protokolle.de/nachrichten/id/206894/
http://www.physorg.com/news/2010-11-dna-reveals-european-farmers.html
http://www.adelaide.edu.au/news/news42161.html
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2010/11/101109172344.htm
http://www.brisbanetimes.com.au/world/dna-cracks-the-mystery-about-the-origins-of-european-farming-20101110-17now.html
http://au.news.yahoo.com/a/-/technology/8293521/dna-study-finds-invaders-first-farmed-europe/
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-11729813
http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2010-11/uoa-dro110810.php

cf:
http://www.plosbiology.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pbio.1000536

They appear to have pinpointed the exact day (maybe) when those Vikings
were all hacked apart and put in a mass grave at St Giles:

http://www.oxfordmail.co.uk/news/8496707.Experts_reveal_brutal_Viking_massacre/

Sewage construction in western Bulgaria reveals a 1000 years b.p. burial:

http://www.sofiaecho.com/2010/11/08/989790_archaeology-1000-year-old-human-skeleton-found-in-western-bulgaria

Skeletal evidence in Spain is suggesting the possibility that typhus and
trench fever was imported from the New World:

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2010/11/101109095714.htm

They've located the wreck of La Marquise de Tourny:

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/this-britain/found-after-300-years-the-scourge-of-the-british-navy-2131814.html

Plans to preserve some prehistoric Ilkley Moor petroglyphs in 3D:

http://news.bbc.co.uk/local/bradford/hi/people_and_places/history/newsid_9167000/9167130.stm

Archaeology in Europe Blog:

http://archaeology-in-europe.blogspot.com/

================================================================
ASIA AND THE SOUTH PACIFIC
================================================================
A Chinese mine in Afghanistan threatens a 7th century B.C. site along the
Silk Road:

http://times-journal.com/news/world/article_7dbb5726-edd9-11df-8ff9-001cc4c002e0.html
http://www.bbc.co.uk/go/rss/int/news/-/news/science-environment-11729813

Claim that Aboriginal folk observed and recorded a "supernova imposter"
event:

http://www.physorg.com/news/2010-11-aboriginal-astronomers-supernova-impostor-event.html

The Guardian's Guide to the Ancient World for India:

http://www.guardian.co.uk/culture/2010/nov/12/ancient-world-india

... and China:

http://www.guardian.co.uk/culture/2010/nov/11/ancient-world-china

More on ground stone tools from Australia:

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2010/11/101106082604.htm

East Asian Archaeology:

http://eastasiablog.wordpress.com/2010/05/20/east-asian-archaeology-cultural-heritage-%E2%80%93-2052010/

Southeast Asian Archaeology Newsblog:

http://www.southeastasianarchaeology.com/

New Zealand Archaeology eNews:

http://www.nzarchaeology.org/netsubnews.htm
================================================================
NORTH AMERICA
================================================================
On social inequality amongst Pueblo peoples:

http://www.physorg.com/news/2010-11-social-inequality-pueblo-indians.html

Pondering Lincoln's victory:

http://opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/11/07/lincoln-wins-now-what

Feature on shipwrecks near Brockville:

http://recorder.ca/ArticleDisplay.aspx?e=2836628

Feature on that Klondike shipwreck that's been in the news the past week or
so:

http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2009/11/photogalleries/091124-ghost-ship-yukon-shipwreck-pictures/?now=2010-11-24-00:01

Running items from an 18th century shipwreck in Florida through a CT scan
revealed a "rare" pistol:

http://staugustine.com/news/local-news/2010-11-08/rare-pistol-uncovered-18th-century-shipwreck

Interesting application of an 1869 Florida law:

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/11/09/us/09foreclosure.html
================================================================
CENTRAL AND SOUTH AMERICA
================================================================
They sent a robot into the tunnel under the Feathered Serpent Temple at
Teotihuacan:

http://www.artdaily.org/index.asp?int_sec=2&int_new=42504
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2010/nov/11/mexico-uses-robot-to-explore-ancient-tunnel/
http://www.boston.com/business/technology/articles/2010/11/11/mexico_uses_robot_to_explore_ancient_tunnel
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20101111/ap_on_sc/lt_mexico_archaeology_robot_4
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/11/11/teotihuacan-tunnel-robot-mexico_n_782001.html
http://www.charlotteobserver.com/2010/11/10/1827928/mexico-uses-robot-to-explore-ancient.html
http://www.google.com/hostednews/canadianpress/article/ALeqM5jDG73_tZWVkLvE7NQDN8ak1XpWOA?docId=5096552
http://newsfeed.time.com/2010/11/11/robot-explorer-reveals-2000-year-old-perfectly-carved-underground-tunnel-in-mexico/

Drought in Brazil has revealed some 7000 years b.p. petroglyphs:

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2010/nov/10/amazon-brazil-stone-age-etchings

Remains of a decapitated ballplayer from Zacatecas (nearby) dating to about
1000 A.D.:

http://www.inah.gob.mx/index.php/boletines/14-hallazgos/4701-descubren-escultura-de-jugador-de-pelota-decapitado

Some 15th century dog-mummies from Peru:

http://www.physorg.com/news/2010-11-mummies-15th-century-dogs-peru.html
http://www.google.com/hostednews/afp/article/ALeqM5hAlAOyxeMmkXSJE5d6ermqPMrdUQ?docId=CNG.343e541c0c6b010ffdd4b15c71b3040d.c81
http://news.discovery.com/archaeology/mummified-dogs-inca-peru.html
http://www.straitstimes.com/BreakingNews/TechandScience/Story/STIStory_601847.html

They've restored Moctezuma's Baths:

http://www.inah.gob.mx/index.php/boletines/12-restauracion/4695-restauran-y-reabren-los-qbanos-de-moctezumaq

The Guardian's Guide to the Ancient World for the Americas:

http://www.guardian.co.uk/culture/2010/nov/09/ancient-world-the-americas

Mike Ruggeri's Ancient Americas Breaking News:

http://web.mac.com/michaelruggeri

Ancient MesoAmerica News:

http://ancient-mesoamerica-news-updates.blogspot.com/
================================================================
OTHER ITEMS OF INTEREST
================================================================
The inspiration for Michelangelo's 'Last Judgement'?

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1329234/Michelangelos-The-Last-Judgement-inspired-visiting-gay-saunas.html
http://www.irishtimes.com/newspaper/frontpage/2010/1113/1224283236701.html
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/art/art-news/8129566/Michelangelos-Last-Judgment-figures-based-on-male-prostitutes.html

On the urbanization-immune-system connection:

http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2010/11/101108-cities-immune-system-tuberculosis-tb-evolution-dna-genetics-science/

A handwriting analyst has concluded that Morton Smith did not pen the
'Secret Mark' (not quite sure
where to classify this one):

http://www.artdaily.org/index.asp?int_sec=2&int_new=42532

Learning from the 1510 flu pandemic:

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2010/11/101112141130.htm

A mural in the Tower of London undergoes Optical Coherence Tomography
scanning:

http://www.newscientist.com/blogs/culturelab/2010/11/medical-technology-sees-beyond-art.html

Not sure where to put this one ... on the clash of symbols in Russia:

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/11/06/world/europe/06iht-russia.html

Stanley Fish ponders the state of liberal arts:

http://opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/11/08/the-woe-is-us-books/

================================================================
TOURISTY THINGS
================================================================
Puglia:

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/travel/article-1329508/Italy-holidays-Six-things-Puglia.html

Backroads Vermont:

http://travel.nytimes.com/2010/11/12/travel/12trails.html
================================================================
BLOGS AND PODCASTS
================================================================
About.com Archaeology:

http://archaeology.about.com/

Archaeology Briefs:

http://archaeologybriefs.blogspot.com/

Naked Archaeology Podcast:

http://www.thenakedscientists.com/HTML/podcasts/archaeology/

Taygete Atlantis excavations blogs aggregator:

http://planet.atlantides.org/taygete/

Time Machine:

http://heatherpringle.wordpress.com/

================================================================
CRIME BEAT
================================================================
A stolen censer from a temple in Ha Tinh (Viet Nam) has been recovered:

http://www.thanhniennews.com/2010/Pages/20101112190623.aspx

Looting Matters:

http://lootingmatters.blogspot.com/

Illicit Cultural Property:

http://illicit-cultural-property.blogspot.com/
================================================================
NUMISMATICA
================================================================
More on that ancient forged Roman coin:

http://www.metro.co.uk/news/846136-roman-coin-forged-by-ancient-del-boy

Latest eSylum newsletter:

http://www.coinbooks.org/club_nbs_esylum_v13n45.html

Ancient Coin Collecting:

http://ancientcoincollecting.blogspot.com/

Ancient Coins:

http://classicalcoins.blogspot.com/

Coin Link:

http://www.coinlink.com/News/
================================================================
EXHIBITIONS, AUCTIONS, AND MUSEUM-RELATED
================================================================
Book of the Dead:

http://www.guardian.co.uk/culture/2010/nov/06/egyptian-book-of-dead-tom-holland
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/art/art-reviews/8117119/Ancient-Egyptian-Book-of-the-Dead-at-British-Museum-review.html
http://www.express.co.uk/posts/view/210342/Book-Of-The-Dead-Mummies-Unravelled
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2010-11-09/mummy-guidebook-to-hereafter-fascinates-at-british-museum-martin-gayford.html

Chaos and Classicism:

http://www.nationalpost.com/opinion/columnists/Dictator+chic+revisited/3798025/story.html

Tombs and Treasures:

http://www.guardian.co.uk/culture/video/2010/nov/09/tutankhamun-tomb-treasures-exhibition-video

Before Pythagoras:

http://www.artdaily.org/index.asp?int_sec=2&int_new=42499

Big bucks for a Chinese vase that was a 'family heirloom':

http://www.artdaily.org/index.asp?int_sec=2&int_new=42510
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/11/13/world/europe/13vase.html
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-11739781
http://uk.news.yahoo.com/5/20101112/tuk-vase-found-in-bungalow-sells-for-rec-45dbed5.html

The Met acknowledged that Egypt is the rightful owner of some Tut objects in
its collection:

http://www.artdaily.org/index.asp?int_sec=2&int_new=42452
http://www.cnn.com/2010/US/11/10/met.king.tut/index.html?section=cnn_latest
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2010-11-10/met-museum-to-return-tutankhamen-s-bronze-dog-sphinx-egypt-council-says.html
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/africaandindianocean/egypt/8124898/New-York-Metropolitan-Museum-of-Art-to-return-King-Tut-artefacts.html
http://news.discovery.com/archaeology/stolen-art-from-tuts-tomb-headed-to-egypt.html
http://www.theaustralian.com.au/news/world/us-returns-tutankhamens-trinkets/story-e6frg6so-1225952861704
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-11728564
http://blogs.wsj.com/metropolis/2010/11/11/metropolitan-museum-returns-artifacts-to-egypt/
http://content.usatoday.com/communities/sciencefair/post/2010/11/met-returns-king-tut-artifacts/1
http://www.google.com/hostednews/canadianpress/article/ALeqM5jKP5J6cb6GJ4DKwoHYL7FX2xhemw?docId=5089223
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/11/10/arts/design/10met.html

Some articles are focussing more on Zahi Hawass' efforts to repatriate
items:

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704689804575535662169204940.html?mod=googlenews_wsj
http://www.zawya.com/story.cfm/sidZW20101110000193

Chinese Museums compiled their "Objects at Risk" list:

http://china.globaltimes.cn/society/2010-11/590857.html

The St Louis Art Museum just acquired a pile of Japanese prints:

http://artsbeat.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/11/08/a-treasure-trove-of-japanese-art-for-st-louis-museum

... and the National Gallery of Art has acquired some furniture:

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/11/12/arts/design/12vogel.html

The National Museum of American Jewish History is open (for a short time):

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/11/12/arts/design/12museum.html

Assorted antiques (and steampunk) items of interest:

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/11/12/arts/design/12antiques.html

Review of MacGregor's '100 Objects' tome:

http://www.guardian.co.uk/books/2010/nov/13/history-world-hundred-objects-review

================================================================
PERFORMANCES AND THEATRE-RELATED
================================================================
Weimar Cinema:

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/11/12/movies/12weimar.html

================================================================
OBITUARIES
================================================================
Honor Frost:

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/obituaries/honor-frost-diver-who-pioneered-the-discipline-of-underwater-archaeology-2127872.html

Frank Turner:

http://dailybulletin.yale.edu/article.aspx?id=8011&utm_source=ytw&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=11-12-10

Oscar G. Brockett:

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/11/09/theater/09brockett.html

Dino DeLaurentiis:

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/11/12/movies/12delaurentiis.html
================================================================
HUMOUR
================================================================
Early Art:

http://www.creators.com/comics/25/68882_thumb.gif

A major groan will be uttered:

http://comics.com/pearls_before_swine/2010-11-07/

Frank and Ernest:

http://comics.com/frank&ernest/2010-11-09/
================================================================
PODCASTS
================================================================
The Book and the Spade:

http://www.radioscribe.com/bknspade.htm

The Dig:

http://www.thedigradio.com/

Stone Pages Archaeology News:

http://news.stonepages.com/

Archaeologica Audio News:

http://www.archaeologychannel.org/AudioNews.asp
================================================================
EXPLORATOR is a weekly newsletter representing the fruits of
the labours of 'media research division' of The Atrium. Various
on-line news and magazine sources are scoured for news of the
ancient world (broadly construed: practically anything relating
to archaeology or history prior to about 1700 or so is fair
game) and every Sunday they are delivered to your mailbox free of
charge!
================================================================
Useful Addresses
================================================================
Past issues of Explorator are available on the web via our
Yahoo site:

http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/Explorator/

To subscribe to Explorator, send a blank email message to:

Explorator-subscribe@yahoogroups.com

To unsubscribe, send a blank email message to:

Explorator-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

To send a 'heads up' to the editor or contact him for other
reasons:

rogueclassicist@...
================================================================
Explorator is Copyright (c) 2010 David Meadows. Feel free to
distribute these listings via email to your pals, students,
teachers, etc., but please include this copyright notice. These
links are not to be posted to any website by any means (whether
by direct posting or snagging from a usenet group or some other
email source) without my express written permission. I think it
is only right that I be made aware of public fora which are
making use of content gathered in Explorator. Thanks!
================================================================

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]





[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81876 From: Cato Date: 2010-11-14
Subject: Consular Intentions
Cato omnibus in foro SPD

I have been asked privately, by several citizens, to voice my intentions here in the Forum.

The office of consul carries with it the responsibility - on a day-to-day level - of carrying the work of the Respublica forward.

To me, this means several things.

First and foremost, it means the building of a true community based on mutual respect for our common goals and our law.

I have advocated strongly for many years that we must clean up our tabularium and free our macronational by-laws from our internal law. As consul, my first goal would be to separate the Constitution and tabularium from our by-laws, allowing us the freedom to act as a Roman respublica under our own guidelines with minimal interference from the outside.

I have advocated strongly for many years the necessity of building, fostering, encouraging and supporting the religiones Romanae - the cultus Deorum - for it is the soul of the Respublica and without it we are simply an animate shell. My private cultus notwithstanding, I will, as consul, do everything in my power to make the sacra publica live again, giving every possible aid and support to educating our citizens and supporting - even subsidizing - our pontiffs and sacerdotes.

Just as ancient Rome embraced and ruled over a multitude of peoples, so can we learn to understand and encourage our peculiar local attributes while using them to make the whole stronger.

I am often gruff to the point of rudeness, but I have always spoken my mind exactly as I felt necessary, and always to the benefit of the Respublica as a whole, with the health and strength of the Respublica my primary objective; I have agreed and disagreed with just about everyone at one time or another, but have always held true to what I feel are the essential strengths and purposes of our life together.

If elected consul I will continue to do so, but with the gift of the authority that only the People of the Respublica can give.

Valete,

Cato
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81877 From: David Kling Date: 2010-11-14
Subject: Re: Consular Intentions
Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus Catoni salutem dicit

You have been gruff with me on several occasions, and I with you; however,
if you stick with those goals it look looks like you'll have a successful
consular year. I particularly liked the following statement you made, "Just
as ancient Rome embraced and ruled over a multitude of peoples, so can we
learn to understand and encourage our peculiar local attributes while using
them to make the whole stronger."

Vale;

Modianus

On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 8:31 PM, Cato <catoinnyc@...> wrote:

>
>
> Cato omnibus in foro SPD
>
> I have been asked privately, by several citizens, to voice my intentions
> here in the Forum.
>
> The office of consul carries with it the responsibility - on a day-to-day
> level - of carrying the work of the Respublica forward.
>
> To me, this means several things.
>
> First and foremost, it means the building of a true community based on
> mutual respect for our common goals and our law.
>
> I have advocated strongly for many years that we must clean up our
> tabularium and free our macronational by-laws from our internal law. As
> consul, my first goal would be to separate the Constitution and tabularium
> from our by-laws, allowing us the freedom to act as a Roman respublica under
> our own guidelines with minimal interference from the outside.
>
> I have advocated strongly for many years the necessity of building,
> fostering, encouraging and supporting the religiones Romanae - the cultus
> Deorum - for it is the soul of the Respublica and without it we are simply
> an animate shell. My private cultus notwithstanding, I will, as consul, do
> everything in my power to make the sacra publica live again, giving every
> possible aid and support to educating our citizens and supporting - even
> subsidizing - our pontiffs and sacerdotes.
>
> Just as ancient Rome embraced and ruled over a multitude of peoples, so can
> we learn to understand and encourage our peculiar local attributes while
> using them to make the whole stronger.
>
> I am often gruff to the point of rudeness, but I have always spoken my mind
> exactly as I felt necessary, and always to the benefit of the Respublica as
> a whole, with the health and strength of the Respublica my primary
> objective; I have agreed and disagreed with just about everyone at one time
> or another, but have always held true to what I feel are the essential
> strengths and purposes of our life together.
>
> If elected consul I will continue to do so, but with the gift of the
> authority that only the People of the Respublica can give.
>
> Valete,
>
> Cato
>
>
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81878 From: myles kroll Date: 2010-11-15
Subject: Hello all
Hello all,
 
I was in your group for 1 yrrs now, and I'm informing u all, that I'm going to
leave this good group till 2013, than I'll come back. I'll promise. OK. bye all
and ty.

 
Myles K. (milieus M. Capricornius)




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81879 From: Cato Date: 2010-11-15
Subject: a.d. XVII Kal. Dec.
Cato omnibus in foro SPD

Hodiernus dies est ante diem XVII Kalendas Decembris; haec dies comitialis est.

"The Samnite war, the sudden dejection of the Lucanians, and the fact
that the Tarentines had been the instigators were quite sufficient in
themselves to cause the senators anxiety. Fresh trouble, however,
arose this year through the action of the Vestinians, who made common
cause with the Samnites. The matter had been a good deal discussed,
though it had not yet occupied the attention of the government. In the
following year, however, the new consuls, L. Furius Camillus and
Junius Brutus Scaeva, made it the very first question to bring before
the senate. Though the subject was no new one, yet it was felt to be
so serious that the senators shrank from either taking it up or
refusing to deal with it. They were afraid that if they left that
nation unpunished, the neighbouring states might be encouraged to make
a similar display of wanton arrogance, while to punish them by force
of arms might lead others to fear similar treatment and arouse
feelings of resentment. In fact, the whole of these nations-the Marsi,
the Paeligni, and the Marrucini-were quite as warlike as the Samnites,
and in case the Vestinians were attacked would have to be reckoned
with as enemies. The victory, however, rested with that party in the
senate who seemed at the time to possess more daring than prudence,
but the result showed that Fortune favours the bold. The people, with
the sanction of the senate, resolved on war with the Vestinians. The
conduct of that war fell by lot to Brutus, the war in Samnium to
Camillus. Armies were marched into both countries, and by carefully
watching the frontiers the enemy were prevented from effecting a
junction. The consul who had the heavier task, L. Furius, was
overtaken by a serious illness and was obliged to resign his command.
He was ordered to nominate a Dictator to carry on the campaign, and he
nominated L. Papirius Cursor, the foremost soldier of his day, Q.
Fabius Maximus Rullianus being appointed Master of the Horse. The two
distinguished themselves by their conduct in the field, but they made
themselves still more famous by the conflict which broke out between
them, and which almost led to fatal consequences. The other consul,
Brutus, carried on an active campaign amongst the Vestinians without
meeting with a single reverse. He ravaged the fields and burnt the
farm buildings and crops of enemy, and at last drove him reluctantly
into action. A pitched battle was fought, and he inflicted such a
defeat on the Vestinians, though with heavy loss on his own side also,
that they fled to their camp, but not feeling sufficiently protected
by fosse and rampart they dispersed in scattered parties to their
towns, trusting to their strong positions and stone walls for their
defence. Brutus now commenced an attack upon their towns. The first to
be taken was Cutina, which he carried by escalade, after a hot assault
by his men, who were eager to avenge the heavy losses they had
sustained in the previous battle. This was followed by the capture of
Cingilia. He gave the spoil of both cities to his troops as a reward
for their having surmounted the walls and gates of the enemy." - Livy,
History of Rome 8.29




Today is the festival of Shichigosan in Japan. Shichigosan literally
means "seven-five-three"; the ceremony is performed in families who
have daughters of seven, sons of five, and sons and daughters of three
years of age. The children are taken to shrines to to drive out evil
spirits and receive the blessings of the deities. Odd numbers are
considered lucky numbers. Candy in bags that are decorated with
turtles and cranes are given to the children. The candy, the crane and
the turtle all symbolize longevity. It is one of the few occasions
these days on which many Japanese women wear the kimono.


Valete bene!

Cato
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81880 From: James V Hooper Date: 2010-11-15
Subject: Re: Hello all
Good luck in what your doing during that time, Hurry back.
C. Pompeius Marcellus


On Sun, 14 Nov 2010 21:47:34 -0800 (PST)
myles kroll <kingofoceanna@...> wrote:
> Hello all,
>  
> I was in your group for 1 yrrs now, and I'm informing u all, that I'm going
>to
> leave this good group till 2013, than I'll come back. I'll promise. OK. bye
>all
> and ty.
>
>  
> Myles K. (milieus M. Capricornius)
>
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81881 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2010-11-15
Subject: Thanksgiving Invitation
Avete Omnes,

This year the Cornelian / Metellian Household would like to send an open
invitation to anyone in NR (or thinking of joining NR) who might be in the
Southwest around the time of Thanksgiving that you would be welcome at our
household. So, if you find yourself in Arizona around Thanksgiving, please
feel free to stop on by. There will be plenty of excellent food, excellent
drink and excellent company!

Respectfully,

Lucius Cornelius Sulla Felix


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81882 From: GAIUS MARCIUS CRISPUS Date: 2010-11-15
Subject: Britannia - reviving our Provincial activity
Salvete omnes

This is to inform all citizens of Britannia that invitations have been sent to all not yet subscribed to the Britannia provincial mailing list to take this opportunity to become members of that list.

If you are not already a member of the list, and do not receive an invitation to join, please contact me at the following email address:-

jbshr1pwa@...


As soon as those who wish to join the list have subscribed, I shall address all citizens of Britannia with information about reviving the Province.

Valete optime, omnes.
C Marcius Crispus
Legatus pro Praetore
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81883 From: Marcus Prometheus Date: 2010-11-16
Subject: Quando crollavano le Mura Aureliane e i ministri di sinistra mica si
*

Quando crollavano le Mura Aureliane e i ministri di sinistra mica si
dimettevanoIl Fazioso | 12 novembre 2010

[image: mura aureliane Quando crollavano le Mura Aureliane e i ministri di
sinistra mica si dimettevano]Che il crollo della Domus dei Gladiatori sia
grave � indubbio. Che sia colpa di Bondi � ridicolo, considerate le pessime
gestioni del sito da sempre e le intemperie atmosferiche. Al di l� della
strumentalizzazione politica piuttosto patetica oggi ho letto un
episodio<http://pietrosalvatori.wordpress.com/2010/11/12/il-bue-che-critica-lasino-a-mezzo-stampa/>
nel
recente passato, uguale e identico, che vide protagonista la sinistra

�La gestione che Bondi ha fatto del Ministero dei beni culturali e� stata
evidentemente catastrofica, a cominciare da un�assenza assoluta di
strategia, di pianificazione e di risorse�.
Parola<http://it.notizie.yahoo.com/19/20101108/tpl-pompei-melandri-pd-e-stato-catastrof-1204c2b.html>
di
Giovanna Melandri in seguito al disastro di Pompei.
Probabilmente solo l�invidia di aver oscurato lo
spettacolarecrollo<http://www.romavissuta.it/mura-romane/il-crollo-delle-mura-aureliane/>
delle
mura aureliane, venute gi� quando sulla poltrona dei Beni Culturali sedeva
lei.

Dimissioni? Zero. Superdifesa della sinistra ai tempi? Ovvia�

Era l�aprile 2001, stante la veltroniana Giovanna Melandri ministro dei Beni
culturali, vennero gi� venti metri di Mura Aureliane all�altezza della Porta
Ardeatina. �Roma si � svegliata senza un pezzo della sua storia�, scrisse il
Messaggero. E il bello � che simili episodi, sempre alle Mura Aureliane,
accaddero in serie (creando ben pi� responsabilit� sui ministri e sindaci
d�allora, tutti di sinistra): nel 2007, ancora governo ulivista (Rutelli
ministro della Cultura, Veltroni sindaco di Roma), ancora Mura Aureliane.
Crolla un capitello. Stesso situazione qualche mese dopo, novembre 2007,
quando crollarono altri 10 metri delle Mura.

Zero processi mediatici, zero mozioni, zero sfiducia, niente di niente. Come
al solito quando si parla della sinistra
*


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81884 From: Cn. Cornelius Lentulus Date: 2010-11-16
Subject: ORDO EQUESTER - The Solution Needed
Public Letter

Cn. Lentulus consulibus, senatui, omnibus Quiritibus sal.


Esteemed Consules, Senatores; I see the current senate session addresses the very important question of the Nova Roman Knights, i.e. the Equestrian Order. I wrote many speeches on that matter in the past, and it is my primary concern in Nova Roma that we can have a proper Equestrian Order, which is not identical with that silly-fake thing which is currently called "ordo equester", and which is an abomination, and is to be replaced by two new things: a group of "recognized public merchants" and a true order of the best men of Nova Roma, the "true ordo equester".

First of all, there is a HUGE MISUNDERSTANDING about the ordo equester. As it is used in Nova Roma, it is established based on the assumption that the ordo equester is an "order of public merchants". It was never that. True, there WERE merchants within the Equestrian Order in Rome, but the criterion of being an equestrian was not to be a merchant, but to have a certain amount of money. Period. So, we can see that being an equester is a census-related thing, like being in the 1st, 2nd, 3rd etc classes.

So, honorable consuls and senators, please, forget about complicating the things too much:
1) those assidui who have a certain number of century points (and perhaps a higher taxpayment), should be called "equites (privati and publici)": equestrians; and
2) create a group of public merchants, which will not be a "honor", or "order" or a "social class", but a simple way to handle NR sponsored trade, and trade that itself sponsors NR.

Please, honored consules and senatores, read my paper below, learn about how there should be 2 categories of equites [1.) equites publici - appointed by the censors for honor, and 2.) equites privati - automatic equestrian status by virtue of having a certain amount of century points, and perhaps, by a higher payment of taxes]. Please learn about how the whole reform should be connected to a reorganization of centuries and tribes (reducing their number), and the century point system (which should be called census point system, as it determines one's census).

Thank you for your attention, and please contact me if you have any question.

My paper follows here:

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 

SOCIAL REFORM AND TWO-TIER TAXATION SYSTEM

1. CAPITE CENSI, ASSIDUI AND EQUITES

1.a. Assidui and capite censi


I propose no change on the status of the assidui and capite censi. They
are good as they are currently. One part of the assidui, however, the
most enthusiast members of Nova Roma, who are willing to contribute
more either financially or by activities, should be given a possibility
of being awarded and to become equestrians, "equites". This way NR
would have a
Two-Tier Taxation System. Higher taxes for the 1st class (it's the Ordo Equester)
and lower taxes for the classes 2-5.

1.b. Equites

We must re-create a much more authentic and historical
ordo equester, based on financial contribution to Nova Roma. Roman
equestrians were the richest class of Rome, that could be represented
in Nova Roma by creating a new kind of equestrian order for those who
pay the higher taxes. We would not give up the MERITOCRACY we had established by the century point system: we would keep that, but with combining this to the Two-Tier Taxation System.

The
higher tax rate for equestrians would be two or three times higher than the basic tax
rate. Who choose to pay that receive the equestrian rank. People
usually like to attain honorary title, so in my opinion, just only the
fact that they would receive the title "Knight"/"Eques" would bring us
many citizens who choose to pay the higher tax. We could add
additional advantages to that ordo equester (like access to JSTOR e.g.).

1.c. "Equites equo privato" and "equites equo publico"

Those assidui who pay a higher level of the current taxes, (two, maximum three times more
than the basic taxes) would be automatically classified as "equites equo
privato", "equestrians with private horse".

The category of "equites
equo publico" would be reserved for those specially distinguished by the
censores who are considered the noblest citizen of NR by the
Censors regarding his contributions, century-points, activities, moral. This would be a long time needed improvement, as NR completely lacks a an awarding-rewarding system, and we should award the most hard working and most virtuous, examplary citizens: with the authentic Roman category of equites equo publico, the censores would have the possibilty to honor and award our best citizens with an authentic, Roman title.

1.d. Consequemces

In
this manner, all people in NR who presently or in the future make policy
for NR (senators and other active citizens) probably would belong to
the Ordo Equester, and the Ordo Equester would be a real entity in NR. This will mean more
income for our republic, and -- that is the most important -- more
authenticity with the ancient Rome. At present only the capite censi
"class out-of-class" is distinguished from the 5 classes. In this system
I propose, the 1st class, the classes 2-5, and the capite censi
all would be distinguished.   And how to
distinguish the classes 2-5?

With the century-point system: just
like the members of the 1st class, the members of the classes 2-5 would
be required to have a certain number of century points in order to be admitted into one of the classes.
  
2. REQUIREMENTS FOR THE CLASSES


Here
I try to create a picture about my proposed system, so that you can see
what requirements should each class satisfy and how this is combined
with the Two-Tier Taxation System and with the century point system.

The Nova Roman society would have the following stratification:

(ATTENTION: the century points below are just examples, they have to be refined!)   I. out-of-class (NON-TAXPAYERS)
a) capite censi -- who don't pay taxes   II. The classes 5-2 (ASSIDUI PAYING LOWER TAXES)
b) the 5th class -- who pay the lower taxes and have cpt 0-15 (e.g.) c) the 4th class -- who pay the lower taxes and have cpt 15-30 (e.g.) d) the 3rd class -- who pay the lower taxes and
have cpt 30-45 (e.g.) e) the 2nd class -- who pay the lower taxes and have cpt 45-60 (e.g.)   III. The 1st class (ASSIDUI PAYING HIGHER TAXES)
f) the Equestrian Order -- who pay the higher taxes and have cpt 60- (e.g.)      - the Equites Equo Privato -- automatic membership if the requirements above are filled;
     - the Equites Equo Publico -- appointed by the Censors as an honor and award;
g)
the Senatorial Order -- who pay the higher taxes and have cpt 100-
(e.g.) and are members of the Senate (-OR-: If there is resistance to
require senators to pay the higher taxes, the only requirement can be
membership in the Senate.)


3. REORGANIZATION OF CENTURIES AND TRIBES





Our troublesome elections demonstrated that we have
serious problems with the size and the number of our centuries and
tribes, and most of the votes are tie and all tie votes must be decided
by lot. This means that if we won't have fewer centuries and tribes,
our elections will continue to be decided by lottery!!

3.a. The tribes

The
number of the tribes should be reduced to 17 (as they were until 387
BCE), instead of the current 35. It would be as historical as the
current number, but more accomodated to our size and necessities.

3.b. The centuries

This
would mean a little re-organization of centuries, too, reducing their
number and being sorted in a more historical
proportion approximating the ancient Roman 98-20-20-20-30+1 centuries by classes proportion, in a Nova Roman 9, 2, 2, 2, 3+1 centuries structure, that would
mean the current 51 centuries would be reduced to 19. All equestrians in the new system would be placed in the first
class, but the "equites equo publico" would be in separate centuries
because this is how they were allocated by the Romans:


9 centuries - to the first class and equestrians, because in the antiquity there were 98
(among
these centuries there would be approximately 2-3 equestrian centuries
for the "equites equo publico", position awarded by the censors.);
2 centuries - to the
second class, because in the antiquity there were 20;
2 centuries - to the third class, because in the antiquity there were 20;
2 centuries - to the fourth class, because in the antiquity there were 20;
3 centuries - to the fifth class, because in the antiquity there were 30;
1 century - to the capite censi, because in the antiquity there was 1 century.

You can make a calculation that this system retains the ancient ratios as much as possible.


4. PUBLIC MERCHANTS - Members of the current Ordo Equester
 

And what
about who are presently equestrians? That they are equestrians
based on a false concept. However there was a good idea to
emphasize who trade with Roman matters: they should be considered also
in the future as official merchants of NR, as "mercatores publici". Of course,
if they pay the higher taxes and obtain the certain number of century
points 1st class requires they remain equestrian too -- except all
those who become senators.  

5. LOWER TAXES - HIGHER TAXES


As for the difference of the lower taxes and higher taxes:   Lower
taxes can be the same or (!) even lower than the present taxes in NR -- but just very
lightly! E.g. if one pays 10$, his future taxes (if he decides to be
member of the 5-2 classes) would be 7$ (only e.g.), or, if you think it better, it could remain the same as it is now.

Higher
taxes should be duplex or (!) triplex of the lower tax. So this person in the example
if wants to be an equestrian he must pay 14$ (or 20$ if we won't diminish the current amount of the tax for the lower tax rates) and achieve the certain
century pts (in the example I gave above, it would be 60 century pts).  

6. THIS SYSTEM WOULD BRING THE FOLLOWING ADVANTAGES:

  1)
Citizens who don't pay taxes because they feel it too much will have an
other opportunity to pay a lower tax: more citizen paying taxes: more
income in the treasury;

2) Citizens of the Ordo Equester must pay duplex taxes: more income in the treasury;

3)
If a citizen wants to be a magistrate, must be in the 1st class and pay
higher taxes.
One who pay more money will care better his obligation
and less will leave the organization he spent lot of money for;

4) Ordo equester will be a great and real entity within NR;

5)
Citizen will be encouraged to collect century points to advance in the
classes. So citizens will be encouraged to be more active;

6) Who presently are members of the Ordo Equester will remain in an emphasized status as "public merchants";

7) Our republic will be more historical, more correct, more Roman.  

I have worked out more details of this plan, and if you have questions about this idea, I'm ready to answer to any question.


VALETE OPTIME VIRI ILLUSTRISSIMI!

Cn. Cornelius Lentulus
 




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81885 From: Publius Memmius Albucius Date: 2010-11-16
Subject: Re: ORDO EQUESTER - The Solution Needed
Salve Corneli,

Your proposal goes, imho, in the good direction.

I have introduced a proposal in the Senate to begin fixing the abnormal situation we live with our merchants. It is an easy step to do ahead, which will not be enough, but allows NR starting towards again, and which reserves the future of its action.

The idea is to fix what we must now, in a not working system, and, second, allowing us, from a cleaned up situation, building with more ambitions.

This future could be a system close to what you present here and which has, globally - for it has no much sense entering in details on such a reform - my support.

If the Senate adopts the current proposal, in order to fix the current merchants status, I am ready to present the Curia a proposal based on yours before my term. If not, and specially because a majority of senators either consider that the system works well or that we may wait for several months to study this possibility, I will suggest that you present it to the elected consuls and tribunes after next January.

Thanks anyway for this serious and efficient contribution. It is rejoicing to see a citizen like you who understands the need fixing our difficulties and proposing interesting and immediate solutions.

Vale sincerely Lentule,


Albucius cos.




Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2010 16:41:04 +0000
From: cn_corn_lent@...
Subject: ORDO EQUESTER - The Solution Needed
To: nova-roma@yahoogroups.com
CC: albucius_aoe@...; christer.edling@...; iulius_sabinus@...; tau.athanasios@...; catoinnyc@...; mlcinnyc@...; spqr753@...; mjk@...; gawne@...; QFabiusMaxmi@...; flavia@...; gn_iulius_caesar@...; wm_hogue@...; marminius@...; robert.woolwine@...





Public Letter

Cn. Lentulus consulibus, senatui, omnibus Quiritibus sal.


Esteemed Consules, Senatores; I see the current senate session addresses the very important question of the Nova Roman Knights, i.e. the Equestrian Order. I wrote many speeches on that matter in the past, and it is my primary concern in Nova Roma that we can have a proper Equestrian Order, which is not identical with that silly-fake thing which is currently called "ordo equester", and which is an abomination, and is to be replaced by two new things: a group of "recognized public merchants" and a true order of the best men of Nova Roma, the "true ordo equester".

First of all, there is a HUGE MISUNDERSTANDING about the ordo equester. As it is used in Nova Roma, it is established based on the assumption that the ordo equester is an "order of public merchants". It was never that. True, there WERE merchants within the Equestrian Order in Rome, but the criterion of being an equestrian was not to be a merchant, but to have a certain amount of money. Period. So, we can see that being an equester is a census-related thing, like being in the 1st, 2nd, 3rd etc classes.

So, honorable consuls and senators, please, forget about complicating the things too much:
1) those assidui who have a certain number of century points (and perhaps a higher taxpayment), should be called "equites (privati and publici)": equestrians; and
2) create a group of public merchants, which will not be a "honor", or "order" or a "social class", but a simple way to handle NR sponsored trade, and trade that itself sponsors NR.

Please, honored consules and senatores, read my paper below, learn about how there should be 2 categories of equites [1.) equites publici - appointed by the censors for honor, and 2.) equites privati - automatic equestrian status by virtue of having a certain amount of century points, and perhaps, by a higher payment of taxes]. Please learn about how the whole reform should be connected to a reorganization of centuries and tribes (reducing their number), and the century point system (which should be called census point system, as it determines one's census).

Thank you for your attention, and please contact me if you have any question.

My paper follows here:

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




SOCIAL REFORM AND TWO-TIER TAXATION SYSTEM

1. CAPITE CENSI, ASSIDUI AND EQUITES

1.a. Assidui and capite censi


I propose no change on the status of the assidui and capite censi. They are good as they are currently. One part of the assidui, however, the most enthusiast members of Nova Roma, who are willing to contribute more either financially or by activities, should be given a possibility of being awarded and to become equestrians, "equites". This way NR would have a Two-Tier Taxation System. Higher taxes for the 1st class (it's the Ordo Equester) and lower taxes for the classes 2-5.

1.b. Equites

We must re-create a much more authentic and historical ordo equester, based on financial contribution to Nova Roma. Roman equestrians were the richest class of Rome, that could be represented in Nova Roma by creating a new kind of equestrian order for those who pay the higher taxes. We would not give up the MERITOCRACY we had established by the century point system: we would keep that, but with combining this to the Two-Tier Taxation System.

The higher tax rate for equestrians would be two or three times higher than the basic tax rate. Who choose to pay that receive the equestrian rank. People usually like to attain honorary title, so in my opinion, just only the fact that they would receive the title "Knight"/"Eques" would bring us many citizens who choose to pay the higher tax. We could add additional advantages to that ordo equester (like access to JSTOR e.g.).

1.c. "Equites equo privato" and "equites equo publico"

Those assidui who pay a higher level of the current taxes, (two, maximum three times more than the basic taxes) would be automatically classified as "equites equo privato", "equestrians with private horse".

The category of "equites equo publico" would be reserved for those specially distinguished by the censores who are considered the noblest citizen of NR by the Censors regarding his contributions, century-points, activities, moral. This would be a long time needed improvement, as NR completely lacks a an awarding-rewarding system, and we should award the most hard working and most virtuous, examplary citizens: with the authentic Roman category of equites equo publico, the censores would have the possibilty to honor and award our best citizens with an authentic, Roman title.

1.d. Consequemces


In this manner, all people in NR who presently or in the future make policy for NR (senators and other active citizens) probably would belong to the Ordo Equester, and the Ordo Equester would be a real entity in NR. This will mean more income for our republic, and -- that is the most important -- more authenticity with the ancient Rome. At present only the capite censi "class out-of-class" is distinguished from the 5 classes. In this system I propose, the 1st class, the classes 2-5, and the capite censi all would be distinguished.

And how to distinguish the classes 2-5?

With the century-point system: just like the members of the 1st class, the members of the classes 2-5 would be required to have a certain number of century points in order to be admitted into one of the classes.



2. REQUIREMENTS FOR THE CLASSES



Here I try to create a picture about my proposed system, so that you can see what requirements should each class satisfy and how this is combined with the Two-Tier Taxation System and with the century point system.

The Nova Roman society would have the following stratification:


(ATTENTION: the century points below are just examples, they have to be refined!)

I. out-of-class (NON-TAXPAYERS)

a) capite censi -- who don't pay taxes

II. The classes 5-2 (ASSIDUI PAYING LOWER TAXES)

b) the 5th class -- who pay the lower taxes and have cpt 0-15 (e.g.)
c) the 4th class -- who pay the lower taxes and have cpt 15-30 (e.g.)

d) the 3rd class -- who pay the lower taxes and have cpt 30-45 (e.g.)

e) the 2nd class -- who pay the lower taxes and have cpt 45-60 (e.g.)


III. The 1st class (ASSIDUI PAYING HIGHER TAXES)
f) the Equestrian Order -- who pay the higher taxes and have cpt 60- (e.g.)
- the Equites Equo Privato -- automatic membership if the requirements above are filled;

- the Equites Equo Publico -- appointed by the Censors as an honor and award;

g) the Senatorial Order -- who pay the higher taxes and have cpt 100- (e.g.) and are members of the Senate (-OR-: If there is resistance to require senators to pay the higher taxes, the only requirement can be membership in the Senate.)


3. REORGANIZATION OF CENTURIES AND TRIBES





Our troublesome elections demonstrated that we have serious problems with the size and the number of our centuries and tribes, and most of the votes are tie and all tie votes must be decided by lot. This means that if we won't have fewer centuries and tribes, our elections will continue to be decided by lottery!!

3.a. The tribes

The number of the tribes should be reduced to 17 (as they were until 387 BCE), instead of the current 35. It would be as historical as the current number, but more accomodated to our size and necessities.

3.b. The centuries

This would mean a little re-organization of centuries, too, reducing their number and being sorted in a more historical proportion approximating the ancient Roman 98-20-20-20-30+1 centuries by classes proportion, in a Nova Roman 9, 2, 2, 2, 3+1 centuries structure, that would mean the current 51 centuries would be reduced to 19. All equestrians in the new system would be placed in the first class, but the "equites equo publico" would be in separate centuries because this is how they were allocated by the Romans:

9 centuries - to the first class and equestrians, because in the antiquity there were 98
(among these centuries there would be approximately 2-3 equestrian centuries for the "equites equo publico", position awarded by the censors.);
2 centuries - to the second class, because in the antiquity there were 20;
2 centuries - to the third class, because in the antiquity there were 20;
2 centuries - to the fourth class, because in the antiquity there were 20;
3 centuries - to the fifth class, because in the antiquity there were 30;
1 century - to the capite censi, because in the antiquity there was 1 century.

You can make a calculation that this system retains the ancient ratios as much as possible.


4. PUBLIC MERCHANTS - Members of the current Ordo Equester




And what about who are presently equestrians? That they are equestrians based on a false concept. However there was a good idea to emphasize who trade with Roman matters: they should be considered also in the future as official merchants of NR, as "mercatores publici". Of course, if they pay the higher taxes and obtain the certain number of century points 1st class requires they remain equestrian too -- except all those who become senators.


5. LOWER TAXES - HIGHER TAXES



As for the difference of the lower taxes and higher taxes:

Lower taxes can be the same or (!) even lower than the present taxes in NR -- but just very lightly! E.g. if one pays 10$, his future taxes (if he decides to be member of the 5-2 classes) would be 7$ (only e.g.), or, if you think it better, it could remain the same as it is now.


Higher taxes should be duplex or (!) triplex of the lower tax. So this person in the example if wants to be an equestrian he must pay 14$ (or 20$ if we won't diminish the current amount of the tax for the lower tax rates) and achieve the certain century pts (in the example I gave above, it would be 60 century pts).



6. THIS SYSTEM WOULD BRING THE FOLLOWING ADVANTAGES:



1) Citizens who don't pay taxes because they feel it too much will have an other opportunity to pay a lower tax: more citizen paying taxes: more income in the treasury;


2) Citizens of the Ordo Equester must pay duplex taxes: more income in the treasury;


3) If a citizen wants to be a magistrate, must be in the 1st class and pay higher taxes.
One who pay more money will care better his obligation and less will leave the organization he spent lot of money for;


4) Ordo equester will be a great and real entity within NR;


5) Citizen will be encouraged to collect century points to advance in the classes. So citizens will be encouraged to be more active;


6) Who presently are members of the Ordo Equester will remain in an emphasized status as "public merchants";


7) Our republic will be more historical, more correct, more Roman.



I have worked out more details of this plan, and if you have questions about this idea, I'm ready to answer to any question.


VALETE OPTIME VIRI ILLUSTRISSIMI!

Cn. Cornelius Lentulus




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81886 From: luciaiuliaaquila Date: 2010-11-16
Subject: Re: ORDO EQUESTER - The Solution Needed
Ave Lentule,

I do appreciate your ambitious plan. This is being discussed in the Aedilician Cohors, to which you are a member.
So I must ask why you have not addressed it with the rest of the cohors and share your concerns as well.
This is a concern I, and others, have also had. If we do not work together as a team but decide to work independently then we set ourselves up for defeat.
I have had conversations with Albucius and Sabinus regarding this matter but I felt it was only fair to share a summary of the discussions with our Consul and Censor with the working cohors so they, the citizen-scribes, can share their thoughts on the matter.
Also in the interest of fairness I shared with our Consul and Censor the result of our meetings.

Vale

Julia



--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Cn. Cornelius Lentulus" <cn_corn_lent@...> wrote:
>
> Public Letter
>
> Cn. Lentulus consulibus, senatui, omnibus Quiritibus sal.
>
>
> Esteemed Consules, Senatores; I see the current senate session addresses the very important question of the Nova Roman Knights, i.e. the Equestrian Order. I wrote many speeches on that matter in the past, and it is my primary concern in Nova Roma that we can have a proper Equestrian Order, which is not identical with that silly-fake thing which is currently called "ordo equester", and which is an abomination, and is to be replaced by two new things: a group of "recognized public merchants" and a true order of the best men of Nova Roma, the "true ordo equester".
>
> First of all, there is a HUGE MISUNDERSTANDING about the ordo equester. As it is used in Nova Roma, it is established based on the assumption that the ordo equester is an "order of public merchants". It was never that. True, there WERE merchants within the Equestrian Order in Rome, but the criterion of being an equestrian was not to be a merchant, but to have a certain amount of money. Period. So, we can see that being an equester is a census-related thing, like being in the 1st, 2nd, 3rd etc classes.
>
> So, honorable consuls and senators, please, forget about complicating the things too much:
> 1) those assidui who have a certain number of century points (and perhaps a higher taxpayment), should be called "equites (privati and publici)": equestrians; and
> 2) create a group of public merchants, which will not be a "honor", or "order" or a "social class", but a simple way to handle NR sponsored trade, and trade that itself sponsors NR.
>
> Please, honored consules and senatores, read my paper below, learn about how there should be 2 categories of equites [1.) equites publici - appointed by the censors for honor, and 2.) equites privati - automatic equestrian status by virtue of having a certain amount of century points, and perhaps, by a higher payment of taxes]. Please learn about how the whole reform should be connected to a reorganization of centuries and tribes (reducing their number), and the century point system (which should be called census point system, as it determines one's census).
>
> Thank you for your attention, and please contact me if you have any question.
>
> My paper follows here:
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>  
>
> SOCIAL REFORM AND TWO-TIER TAXATION SYSTEM
>
> 1. CAPITE CENSI, ASSIDUI AND EQUITES
>
> 1.a. Assidui and capite censi
>
>
> I propose no change on the status of the assidui and capite censi. They
> are good as they are currently. One part of the assidui, however, the
> most enthusiast members of Nova Roma, who are willing to contribute
> more either financially or by activities, should be given a possibility
> of being awarded and to become equestrians, "equites". This way NR
> would have a
> Two-Tier Taxation System. Higher taxes for the 1st class (it's the Ordo Equester)
> and lower taxes for the classes 2-5.
>
> 1.b. Equites
>
> We must re-create a much more authentic and historical
> ordo equester, based on financial contribution to Nova Roma. Roman
> equestrians were the richest class of Rome, that could be represented
> in Nova Roma by creating a new kind of equestrian order for those who
> pay the higher taxes. We would not give up the MERITOCRACY we had established by the century point system: we would keep that, but with combining this to the Two-Tier Taxation System.
>
> The
> higher tax rate for equestrians would be two or three times higher than the basic tax
> rate. Who choose to pay that receive the equestrian rank. People
> usually like to attain honorary title, so in my opinion, just only the
> fact that they would receive the title "Knight"/"Eques" would bring us
> many citizens who choose to pay the higher tax. We could add
> additional advantages to that ordo equester (like access to JSTOR e.g.).
>
> 1.c. "Equites equo privato" and "equites equo publico"
>
> Those assidui who pay a higher level of the current taxes, (two, maximum three times more
> than the basic taxes) would be automatically classified as "equites equo
> privato", "equestrians with private horse".
>
> The category of "equites
> equo publico" would be reserved for those specially distinguished by the
> censores who are considered the noblest citizen of NR by the
> Censors regarding his contributions, century-points, activities, moral. This would be a long time needed improvement, as NR completely lacks a an awarding-rewarding system, and we should award the most hard working and most virtuous, examplary citizens: with the authentic Roman category of equites equo publico, the censores would have the possibilty to honor and award our best citizens with an authentic, Roman title.
>
> 1.d. Consequemces
>
> In
> this manner, all people in NR who presently or in the future make policy
> for NR (senators and other active citizens) probably would belong to
> the Ordo Equester, and the Ordo Equester would be a real entity in NR. This will mean more
> income for our republic, and -- that is the most important -- more
> authenticity with the ancient Rome. At present only the capite censi
> "class out-of-class" is distinguished from the 5 classes. In this system
> I propose, the 1st class, the classes 2-5, and the capite censi
> all would be distinguished.   And how to
> distinguish the classes 2-5?
>
> With the century-point system: just
> like the members of the 1st class, the members of the classes 2-5 would
> be required to have a certain number of century points in order to be admitted into one of the classes.
>   
> 2. REQUIREMENTS FOR THE CLASSES
>
>
> Here
> I try to create a picture about my proposed system, so that you can see
> what requirements should each class satisfy and how this is combined
> with the Two-Tier Taxation System and with the century point system.
>
> The Nova Roman society would have the following stratification:
>
> (ATTENTION: the century points below are just examples, they have to be refined!)   I. out-of-class (NON-TAXPAYERS)
> a) capite censi -- who don't pay taxes   II. The classes 5-2 (ASSIDUI PAYING LOWER TAXES)
> b) the 5th class -- who pay the lower taxes and have cpt 0-15 (e.g.) c) the 4th class -- who pay the lower taxes and have cpt 15-30 (e.g.) d) the 3rd class -- who pay the lower taxes and
> have cpt 30-45 (e.g.) e) the 2nd class -- who pay the lower taxes and have cpt 45-60 (e.g.)   III. The 1st class (ASSIDUI PAYING HIGHER TAXES)
> f) the Equestrian Order -- who pay the higher taxes and have cpt 60- (e.g.)      - the Equites Equo Privato -- automatic membership if the requirements above are filled;
>      - the Equites Equo Publico -- appointed by the Censors as an honor and award;
> g)
> the Senatorial Order -- who pay the higher taxes and have cpt 100-
> (e.g.) and are members of the Senate (-OR-: If there is resistance to
> require senators to pay the higher taxes, the only requirement can be
> membership in the Senate.)
>
>
> 3. REORGANIZATION OF CENTURIES AND TRIBES
>
>
>
>
>
> Our troublesome elections demonstrated that we have
> serious problems with the size and the number of our centuries and
> tribes, and most of the votes are tie and all tie votes must be decided
> by lot. This means that if we won't have fewer centuries and tribes,
> our elections will continue to be decided by lottery!!
>
> 3.a. The tribes
>
> The
> number of the tribes should be reduced to 17 (as they were until 387
> BCE), instead of the current 35. It would be as historical as the
> current number, but more accomodated to our size and necessities.
>
> 3.b. The centuries
>
> This
> would mean a little re-organization of centuries, too, reducing their
> number and being sorted in a more historical
> proportion approximating the ancient Roman 98-20-20-20-30+1 centuries by classes proportion, in a Nova Roman 9, 2, 2, 2, 3+1 centuries structure, that would
> mean the current 51 centuries would be reduced to 19. All equestrians in the new system would be placed in the first
> class, but the "equites equo publico" would be in separate centuries
> because this is how they were allocated by the Romans:
>
>
> 9 centuries - to the first class and equestrians, because in the antiquity there were 98
> (among
> these centuries there would be approximately 2-3 equestrian centuries
> for the "equites equo publico", position awarded by the censors.);
> 2 centuries - to the
> second class, because in the antiquity there were 20;
> 2 centuries - to the third class, because in the antiquity there were 20;
> 2 centuries - to the fourth class, because in the antiquity there were 20;
> 3 centuries - to the fifth class, because in the antiquity there were 30;
> 1 century - to the capite censi, because in the antiquity there was 1 century.
>
> You can make a calculation that this system retains the ancient ratios as much as possible.
>
>
> 4. PUBLIC MERCHANTS - Members of the current Ordo Equester
>  
>
> And what
> about who are presently equestrians? That they are equestrians
> based on a false concept. However there was a good idea to
> emphasize who trade with Roman matters: they should be considered also
> in the future as official merchants of NR, as "mercatores publici". Of course,
> if they pay the higher taxes and obtain the certain number of century
> points 1st class requires they remain equestrian too -- except all
> those who become senators.  
>
> 5. LOWER TAXES - HIGHER TAXES
>
>
> As for the difference of the lower taxes and higher taxes:   Lower
> taxes can be the same or (!) even lower than the present taxes in NR -- but just very
> lightly! E.g. if one pays 10$, his future taxes (if he decides to be
> member of the 5-2 classes) would be 7$ (only e.g.), or, if you think it better, it could remain the same as it is now.
>
> Higher
> taxes should be duplex or (!) triplex of the lower tax. So this person in the example
> if wants to be an equestrian he must pay 14$ (or 20$ if we won't diminish the current amount of the tax for the lower tax rates) and achieve the certain
> century pts (in the example I gave above, it would be 60 century pts).  
>
> 6. THIS SYSTEM WOULD BRING THE FOLLOWING ADVANTAGES:
>
>   1)
> Citizens who don't pay taxes because they feel it too much will have an
> other opportunity to pay a lower tax: more citizen paying taxes: more
> income in the treasury;
>
> 2) Citizens of the Ordo Equester must pay duplex taxes: more income in the treasury;
>
> 3)
> If a citizen wants to be a magistrate, must be in the 1st class and pay
> higher taxes.
> One who pay more money will care better his obligation
> and less will leave the organization he spent lot of money for;
>
> 4) Ordo equester will be a great and real entity within NR;
>
> 5)
> Citizen will be encouraged to collect century points to advance in the
> classes. So citizens will be encouraged to be more active;
>
> 6) Who presently are members of the Ordo Equester will remain in an emphasized status as "public merchants";
>
> 7) Our republic will be more historical, more correct, more Roman.  
>
> I have worked out more details of this plan, and if you have questions about this idea, I'm ready to answer to any question.
>
>
> VALETE OPTIME VIRI ILLUSTRISSIMI!
>
> Cn. Cornelius Lentulus
>  
>
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81887 From: luciaiuliaaquila Date: 2010-11-16
Subject: Re: Certificate - Provinces Britannia and California
Iulia Crispo Fabio sal


Britannia is in the best hands it could ever hope to be! Gratulatio Crispe amice I know you to be a level headed conscientious person and you are an asset to any provincia!
Fabi, I do not know you personally but gratulatio to you as well and I wish you the best and also great fortune for California.

Etiam nunc saluto te, bene valete et vivite!

Julia
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81888 From: luciaiuliaaquila Date: 2010-11-16
Subject: Re: Thanksgiving Invitation
Ave Sulla,

What time is dinner? Dress code? Menu?
I should be back from my sojourn by then, btw, you wouldn't be providing transportation from Tennessee wouldja?
*laughs*
Gratias to you, Aeternia and Metellus, 'tis a very kind gesture and if I was in the area I would surely stop by!

Vale bene,

Julia
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81889 From: luciaiuliaaquila Date: 2010-11-16
Subject: Re: statement of intent
Ave Maria Caeca amica mea!

A good Rogatrix you shall be! Bona Fortuna!

Optime vale in cura deorum!

Julia
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81890 From: David Kling Date: 2010-11-16
Subject: Re: Thanksgiving Invitation
Salve;

That is kind of you. Unfortunately, I am far from Arizona. My wife an I
will be dining at a local Indian restaurant and seeing a movie. A
"tradition" we started last year for the holidays that was remarkably
relaxing.

Vale;

Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus

On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 2:55 PM, Robert Woolwine
<robert.woolwine@...>wrote:

>
>
> Avete Omnes,
>
> This year the Cornelian / Metellian Household would like to send an open
> invitation to anyone in NR (or thinking of joining NR) who might be in the
> Southwest around the time of Thanksgiving that you would be welcome at our
> household. So, if you find yourself in Arizona around Thanksgiving, please
> feel free to stop on by. There will be plenty of excellent food, excellent
> drink and excellent company!
>
> Respectfully,
>
> Lucius Cornelius Sulla Felix
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81891 From: Cato Date: 2010-11-16
Subject: a.d. XVI Kal. Dec.
Cato omnibus in foro SPD

Hodiernus dies est ante diem XVI Kalendas Decembris; haec dies comitialis est.

"The advance into Samnium was made under doubtful auspices. This
circumstance did not portend the result of the campaign, for that was
quite favourable, but it did forshadow the insane passion which the
commanders displayed. Papirius was warned by the pullarius that it
would be necessary to take the auspices afresh. On his departure for
Rome for this purpose, he strictly charged the Master of the Horse to
keep within his lines and not to engage the enemy. After he had gone
Q. Fabius learnt from his scouts that the enemy were showing as much
carelessness as if there were not a single Roman in Samnium. Whether
it was that his youthful temper resented everything being dependent on
the Dictator, or whether he was tempted by the chance offered him of a
brilliant success, at any rate, after making the necessary
preparations and dispositions he advanced as far as Inbrinium-for so
is the district called-and fought a battle with the Samnites. Such was
the fortune of the fight that had the Dictator himself been present he
could have done nothing to make the success more complete. The general
did not disappoint his men, nor did the men disappoint their general.
The cavalry made repeated charges but failed to break through the
massed force opposed to them, and acting on the advice of L. Cominius,
a military tribune, they removed the bits from their horses and
spurred them on so furiously that nothing could withstand them. Riding
down men and armour they spread carnage far and wide. The infantry
followed them and completed the disorder of the enemy. It is said that
they lost 20,000 men that day. Some authorities whom I have consulted
state that there were two battles fought in the Dictator's absence,
and each was a brilliant success. In the oldest writers, however, only
one battle is mentioned, and some annalists omit the incident
altogether.

In consequence of the vast number slain, a large amount of spoil in
the shape of armour and weapons was picked up on the battle-field, and
the Master of the Horse had this collected into a huge heap and burnt.
His object may have been to discharge a vow to some deity. But if we
are to trust the authority of Fabius, he did this to prevent the
Dictator from reaping the fruits of his glory, or carrying the spoils
in his triumph and afterwards placing his name upon them. The fact
also of his sending the despatches announcing his victory to the
senate and not to the Dictator would seem to show that he was by no
means anxious to allow him any share in the credit of it. At all
events the Dictator took it in that light, and whilst everybody else
was jubilant at the victory which had been won, he wore an expression
of gloom and wrath. He abruptly dismissed the senate and hurried from
the Senate-house, repeatedly exclaiming that the authority and dignity
of the Dictator would be as completely overthrown by the Master of the
Horse as the Samnite legions had been if this contempt of his orders
were to remain unpunished. In this angry and menacing mood, he started
with all possible speed for the camp. He was unable, however, to reach
it before news arrived of his approach, for messengers had started
from the City in advance of him, bringing word that the Dictator was
coming bent on vengeance, and almost every other word he uttered was
in praise of T. Manlius." - Livy, History of Rome 8.30



"Hekate Einodia, Trioditis, lovely dame, of earthly, watery, and
celestial frame, sepulchral, in a saffron veil arrayed, pleased with
dark ghosts that wander through the shade; Perseis, solitary goddess,
hail! The world's key-bearer, never doomed to fail; in stags
rejoicing, huntress, nightly seen, and drawn by bulls, unconquerable
queen; Leader, Nymphe, nurse, on mountains wandering, hear the
suppliants who with holy rites thy power revere, and to the herdsman
with a favouring mind draw near." - Orphic Hymn 1 to Hecate

"Hekate Brimo ... hearing his words from the abyss, came up ... She
was garlanded by fearsome snakes that coiled themselves round twigs
of oak; the twinkle of a thousand torches lit the scene; and hounds
of the underworld barked shrilly all around her." - Apollonius
Rhodius, Argonautica 3.1194

"Then, earth began to bellow, trees to dance
And howling dogs in glimmering light advance
Ere Hecate came." - Vergil, The Aeneid Book VL

"[Medea] wearies heaven above and Tartarus beneath with her complains;
she beats upon the ground, and murmuring into her clutching hands
calls on the Queen of Night [Hekate] and Dis [Haides] to bring her aid
by granting death, and to send him who is the cause of her madness
down with her to destruction." – Valerius Flaccus, The Argonautica
7.311

Out of Erebos and Chaos she called Nox (Night) and the Di Nocti (Gods
of Night) and poured a prayer with long-drawn wailing cries to
Hecate ... a groan came from the ground, the bushes blanched, the
spattered sward was soaked with gouts of blood, stones brayed and
bellowed, dogs began to bark, black snakes swarmed on the soil and
ghostly shapes of silent spirits floated through the air." - Ovid,
Metamorphoses 10.403

"Baying [of Hounds] loud as that which rings at the grim gate of Dis
[Haides] or from Hecate's escort [of black hounds] to the world
above." - Valerius Flaccus, Argonautica 6.110

"At another time you are Proserpina, whose howls at night inspire
dread, and whose triple form restrains the emergence of ghosts as you
keep the entrance to the earth above firmly barred. You wander
through diverse groves, and are appeased by various rites." -
Apuleius, Golden Ass 11.218



Today in ancient Greece was held in honor of the goddess Hekate. She
is most often shown accompanied by two ghostly hounds, and the barking
of dogs announces Her approach. Hekate is a goddess shrouded in
mystery, for there is continuing debate about Her name, origin and
character. There are few legends about Her,and no fixed geneology.
Some say that Hekate is the daughter of Erebus and Nyx, ageless
Goddess of the night, while others believe that She is one of the
Furies or the last surviving Titan except for Zeus. Hesoid claims
that She was born of the Titan Perses and the star goddess Asteria.
Musaeus claims She was born to Asteria and Zeus, Euripides says She is
a daughter of Leto, while Thessalian legend has it that Hekate is the
daughter of Admetus and a Pheraean woman.

The Olympians "adopted" Her after they had defeated the Titans, but
She was not of the same kind, and never lived amongst them. During
this time Hekate's power was still recognized: Zeus gave Her dominion
over Heaven, Earth and Sea, and they shared the right to grant or
withhold gifts from humanity. Hekate was worshipped as Goddess of
abundance and eloquence. Hekate is sometimes referred to a triple
goddess. Classically She was part of a group with Persephone and
Demeter. Contrary to modern Pagan assumptions, Demeter represents the
old crone woman, Persephone the wife woman, and Hekate is the Maiden.
Every early Greek representation of Hekate shows Her as a young woman.
It is only much later that She is represented as Crone.

In Mytilene on the eastern coast of the Aegean Sea, near what was
Troy, there are Temples of Demeter, where the women would go to the
annual festival of Eleusis to celebrate fertility rites. There is
ample evidence that Hekate was honored there too, perhaps as a guide
for initiates into the Mysteries.

But Hekate's power was to fade. In later myths She is represented as a
daughter of Zeus who rules the Underworld & the waning Moon. The
Greeks began to emphasize Her darker aspects; Hekate as Goddess of the
Dead & Queen of Witches. She was increasingly depicted as roaming the
earth on moonless nights in the company of baying dogs and the hungry
spirits of those dead who were not ready to die, those who were
murdered or not given appropriate burial rites.

Hekate has long been associated with crossroads where three roads
meet. In ancient Greek religion the soul was judged at a place where
three roads meet. One road led to the Elysian Fields, one to the
Fields of Asphodel, and the third road to Tartarus. So any crossroads
where three roads meet might symbolize this place of judgment, and be
seen as a sacred place.

The Romans adopted Hekate, and Her role shifted again. Hekate became
an aspect of the moon Goddess, Diana Triformus: Diana, the Full moon,
associated with Earth; Proserpina, the lunar phases, associated with
Heaven; and Hekate, the New moon, associated with the Underworld.

Valete bene!

Cato
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81892 From: Cato Date: 2010-11-16
Subject: Re: ORDO EQUESTER - The Solution Needed
Cato Cornelio Lentulo omnibusque in foro SPD

I find this idea fascinating.

First, let me point out that our Articles of Incorporation would *not* need to be amended, as there are only two classes of citizens listed: tax-paying (assidui) and non-tax-paying (capite censi); the amount of tax or how it is paid is not specified, nor are any other specifications or delineations, those being left to our own law.

So the idea that senators - or anyone willing to pay a higher tax rate - could be listed in the Ordo Equester is both historically accurate and a good idea for generating revenue.

The concept of the "knights of the public horse", an honor given by the censors, is another exceptionally good idea grounded in historic practice.

I applaud Cornelius Lentulus and intend to give my full support to this idea.

Valete,

Cato
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81893 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2010-11-16
Subject: Re: Thanksgiving Invitation
Ave!

Time? Umm...Traditionally we start around 2 pm.
Dress Code would be informal and casual.
Menu is being worked on currently. My secretary is bringing some side
dishes. Metellus was talking about cooking two turkeys and a Ham (I wont
touch the ham) LOL Metellus also has an idea about side dishes too - him
and Tink are from the South and they can cook! ;)

I will just sit back and watch Dallas lose again on TV. LOL

Vale,

Sulla

On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 1:14 PM, luciaiuliaaquila <
luciaiuliaaquila@...> wrote:

>
>
> Ave Sulla,
>
> What time is dinner? Dress code? Menu?
> I should be back from my sojourn by then, btw, you wouldn't be providing
> transportation from Tennessee wouldja?
> *laughs*
> Gratias to you, Aeternia and Metellus, 'tis a very kind gesture and if I
> was in the area I would surely stop by!
>
> Vale bene,
>
> Julia
>
>
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81894 From: Aqvillivs Date: 2010-11-16
Subject: Senate Session Report/ I. Nov. 2763/TRIB. ROTA
Ex officio Tribunorum Plebis

From the office of the Tribune of the Plebs Gaius Aquillius Rota on Nov
12 2763.





Tribunican Report of the Session of the Senate of Nova Roma closed on
the 11th of November.

To inform the people of Nova Roma.

Our Consul Publius Memmius Albucius called the board, the Senate and the
Tribunes for the following Senate Session starting at Nov 4 2763.
Auspices have been taken and turned out to be favorable for this Session
of the House.

Senators present 21

Senators voted 16:



C. Flavius Diocletianus

Cn.Equitius Marinus

D. Iunius Palladius Invictus

K. Fabius Buteo Quintilianus

L. Cornelius Sulla Felix

Ti. Galerius Paulinus

M. Minucius Audens

Q. Fabius Maximus

T. Iulius Sabinus

A. Tullia Scholastica

C. Equitius Cato

M. Iulius Perusianus

P. Memmius Albucius

Cn. Iulius Caesar

C. Vipsanius Agrippa

Q. Suetonius Paulinus



Senators who did not vote on 8 items:

M. Curatius Complutensis

M. Iulius Severus

M. Arminius Maior

Em. Curia Finnica

M. Lucretius Agricola





Tribunes: Petronius Dexter, Aquillius Rota



This Session of the honorable House was a very smooth and disciplined
one. Consul Albucius

displayed excellent leadership in the conduction of this Senate meeting.



All agenda Items were discussed during the contio term before the voting
period.









The items and voting:



Item III – Official lists – definition – representation of
the Senate (discussion + vote)

ITEM PASSED VR-12 Abs-1 A-3

This item therefore intends defining more precisely what are the «
official lists » of Nova Roma, and what this qualification means. It
thus defines further the obligations of the citizens who are, in
Yahoo!'s meaning « owners » of a list, and also provides the rules
concerning the presence of senators in these lists.

It sets a complete view of all our official lists, and specially places
all our provincial, local or technical ones in this group.

Last, it links the qualification of "official list" with the
exclusivity, owned by Nova Roma, to control its name and image.



C. Flavius Diocletianus VR/Cn.Equitius Marinus A/D. Iunius Palladius
Invictus VR/K. Fabius Buteo Quintilianus Abs/L. Cornelius Sulla Felix
VR/Ti. Galerius Paulinus VR/M. Minucius Audens VR/

Q. Fabius Maximus VR/T. Iulius Sabinus VR/A. Tullia Scholastica A/C.
Equitius Cato VR/M. Iulius Perusianus A/P. Memmius Albucius VR/Cn.
Iulius Caesar VR/C. Vipsanius Agrippa VR/Q. Suetonius Paulinus VR

________________________________________________________________________\
_________

Item V – Annual elections 2763 - SCU on the electoral legal system -
prorogation (discussion + vote)

ITEM PASSED VR-14 Abs-1 A-1



In relation with the item already evoked the proposal is just to
prorogue the senatus consultus ultimum adopted last July by your House,
and which has not been implemented by the consul maior, in order to let
time to build again the consensus that the July crisis had hurt.

The proposal is to prorogue it to next Dec. 31, in order that next
elections proceedings may be adapted to our emergency situation.

C. Flavius Diocletianus VR/Cn.Equitius Marinus VR/D. Iunius Palladius
Invictus VR/K. Fabius Buteo Quintilianus Abs/L. Cornelius Sulla Felix
VR/Ti. Galerius Paulinus VR/M. Minucius Audens VR/

Q. Fabius Maximus VR/T. Iulius Sabinus VR/A. Tullia Scholastica A/C.
Equitius Cato VR/M. Iulius Perusianus A/P. Memmius Albucius VR/Cn.
Iulius Caesar VR/C. Vipsanius Agrippa VR/Q. Suetonius Paulinus VR

________________________________________________________________________\
_________



Item VI – Annual elections 2763 – appointment of the required
vigintisexviri - SCU (discussion + vote)

ITEM PASSED VR-13 Abs-1 A-2



C. Flavius Diocletianus VR/Cn.Equitius Marinus A/D. Iunius Palladius
Invictus VR/K. Fabius Buteo Quintilianus Abs/L. Cornelius Sulla Felix
VR/Ti. Galerius Paulinus VR/M. Minucius Audens VR/

Q. Fabius Maximus VR/T. Iulius Sabinus VR/A. Tullia Scholastica A/C.
Equitius Cato VR/M. Iulius Perusianus VR/P. Memmius Albucius VR/Cn.
Iulius Caesar VR/C. Vipsanius Agrippa VR/Q. Suetonius Paulinus VR

________________________________________________________________________\
________



Item VIII – Bylaws – senatorial ad hoc committee (information
and candidacies)

ITEM PASSED VR-15 Abs-1 A-0



C. Flavius Diocletianus VR/Cn.Equitius Marinus VR/D. Iunius Palladius
Invictus VR/K. Fabius Buteo Quintilianus Abs/L. Cornelius Sulla Felix
VR/Ti. Galerius Paulinus VR/M. Minucius Audens VR/

Q. Fabius Maximus VR/T. Iulius Sabinus VR/A. Tullia Scholastica VR/C.
Equitius Cato VR/M. Iulius Perusianus VR/P. Memmius Albucius VR/Cn.
Iulius Caesar VR/C. Vipsanius Agrippa VR/Q. Suetonius Paulinus VR

________________________________________________________________________\
________



Item IX – Forum – Creation of a forum for guests and
non-citizens (discussion + vote)

ITEM PASSED VR-11 Abs-1 A-4



C. Flavius Diocletianus VR/Cn.Equitius Marinus A/D. Iunius Palladius
Invictus VR/K. Fabius Buteo Quintilianus Abs/L. Cornelius Sulla Felix
VR/Ti. Galerius Paulinus VR/M. Minucius Audens VR/

Q. Fabius Maximus VR/T. Iulius Sabinus VR/A. Tullia Scholastica A/C.
Equitius Cato A/M. Iulius Perusianus A/P. Memmius Albucius VR/Cn. Iulius
Caesar VR/C. Vipsanius Agrippa VR/Q. Suetonius Paulinus VR

________________________________________________________________________\
________



Item X – Provinces – Appointment of governor – Britannia
(discussion + vote)

G. Marcius Crispus shall be appointed, from this day on and until the
senatorial appointment review scheduled, in the present state of Nova
Roma Law, in March 2765 auc, governor (legatus pro praetore) of the
province of Britannia.

.



ITEM PASSED VR-15 Abs-1 A-0



C. Flavius Diocletianus VR/Cn.Equitius Marinus VR/D. Iunius Palladius
Invictus VR/K. Fabius Buteo Quintilianus Abs/L. Cornelius Sulla Felix
VR/Ti. Galerius Paulinus VR/M. Minucius Audens VR/

Q. Fabius Maximus VR/T. Iulius Sabinus VR/A. Tullia Scholastica VR/C.
Equitius Cato VR/M. Iulius Perusianus VR/P. Memmius Albucius VR/Cn.
Iulius Caesar VR/C. Vipsanius Agrippa VR/Q. Suetonius Paulinus VR

________________________________________________________________________\
_



Item XI – Provinces – Appointment of governor – California
(discussion + vote)

Q. Fabius Maximus shall be appointed, from this day on and until the
senatorial appointment review scheduled, in the present state of Nova
Roma Law, in March 2765 auc, governor (proconsul) of the province of
California.



ITEM PASSED VR-13 Abs-2 A-1



C. Flavius Diocletianus VR/Cn.Equitius Marinus Abs/D. Iunius Palladius
Invictus VR/K. Fabius Buteo Quintilianus Abs/L. Cornelius Sulla Felix
VR/Ti. Galerius Paulinus VR/M. Minucius Audens VR/

Q. Fabius Maximus VR/T. Iulius Sabinus VR/A. Tullia Scholastica A/C.
Equitius Cato VR/M. Iulius Perusianus VR/P. Memmius Albucius VR/Cn.
Iulius Caesar VR/C. Vipsanius Agrippa VR/Q. Suetonius Paulinus VR



________________________________________________________________________\
________





Item XII: The addition of the State of Hawaii to the territory of the
Province of California

Article 1 : The province of California contains the current territories
of U.S.A. States of California, Nevada and Hawaï.



ITEM PASSED VR-14 Abs-1 A-1



C. Flavius Diocletianus VR/Cn.Equitius Marinus VR/D. Iunius Palladius
Invictus VR/K. Fabius Buteo Quintilianus Abs/L. Cornelius Sulla Felix
VR/Ti. Galerius Paulinus VR/M. Minucius Audens VR/

Q. Fabius Maximus VR/T. Iulius Sabinus VR/A. Tullia Scholastica A/C.
Equitius Cato VR/M. Iulius Perusianus VR/P. Memmius Albucius VR/Cn.
Iulius Caesar VR/C. Vipsanius Agrippa VR/Q. Suetonius Paulinus VR

________________________________________________________________________\
__





Summary:



Following this Senate session and the smoothness with which it was
processed I have the impression that the time of stalemate of Nova Roma
might come to an end.

Honorable Consul Albucius even called in a second session right after
closing the one w3hich is the subject of this report.

A lot of important issues are put on the agenda such as modifications of
the tax system or the

repair of the current malicious situation of the Macellum. The creation
of most necessary revenue

to improve the financial situation is in the works.

If the Senate is able to proceed as smooth and progressive as it did
during this session we have reason to be optimistic for the coming year.





C.AQV.ROTA

TRIB.PLEB.

LEG.PR.PR.



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81895 From: David Kling Date: 2010-11-16
Subject: Re: ORDO EQUESTER - The Solution Needed
Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus S.P.D.

I too find much merit in the proposal; however, I would like to add one
thing that I think is VERY needed in Nova Roma. The idea of a lifetime
"membership/citizenship." A one time flat rate that would entitle a person
to lifetime assidui status.

Valete;

Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus

On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 3:53 PM, Cato <catoinnyc@...> wrote:

>
>
> Cato Cornelio Lentulo omnibusque in foro SPD
>
> I find this idea fascinating.
>
> First, let me point out that our Articles of Incorporation would *not* need
> to be amended, as there are only two classes of citizens listed: tax-paying
> (assidui) and non-tax-paying (capite censi); the amount of tax or how it is
> paid is not specified, nor are any other specifications or delineations,
> those being left to our own law.
>
> So the idea that senators - or anyone willing to pay a higher tax rate -
> could be listed in the Ordo Equester is both historically accurate and a
> good idea for generating revenue.
>
> The concept of the "knights of the public horse", an honor given by the
> censors, is another exceptionally good idea grounded in historic practice.
>
> I applaud Cornelius Lentulus and intend to give my full support to this
> idea.
>
> Valete,
>
> Cato
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81896 From: Cato Date: 2010-11-16
Subject: Re: ORDO EQUESTER - The Solution Needed
Cato Fabio Modiano sal.

An interesting addition, and one that has a great deal of merit. The *only* hesitation I have is...what if that citizen does something horrific, worthy of exile or banishment? Would they simply be returned their payment?

Vale,

Cato

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, David Kling <tau.athanasios@...> wrote:
>
> Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus S.P.D.
>
> I too find much merit in the proposal; however, I would like to add one
> thing that I think is VERY needed in Nova Roma. The idea of a lifetime
> "membership/citizenship." A one time flat rate that would entitle a person
> to lifetime assidui status.
>
> Valete;
>
> Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus
>
> On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 3:53 PM, Cato <catoinnyc@...> wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > Cato Cornelio Lentulo omnibusque in foro SPD
> >
> > I find this idea fascinating.
> >
> > First, let me point out that our Articles of Incorporation would *not* need
> > to be amended, as there are only two classes of citizens listed: tax-paying
> > (assidui) and non-tax-paying (capite censi); the amount of tax or how it is
> > paid is not specified, nor are any other specifications or delineations,
> > those being left to our own law.
> >
> > So the idea that senators - or anyone willing to pay a higher tax rate -
> > could be listed in the Ordo Equester is both historically accurate and a
> > good idea for generating revenue.
> >
> > The concept of the "knights of the public horse", an honor given by the
> > censors, is another exceptionally good idea grounded in historic practice.
> >
> > I applaud Cornelius Lentulus and intend to give my full support to this
> > idea.
> >
> > Valete,
> >
> > Cato
> >
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81897 From: David Kling Date: 2010-11-16
Subject: Re: ORDO EQUESTER - The Solution Needed
Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus Catoni salutem dicit

I would say they would forfeit whatever was paid. If their citizenship is
forcably removed then they would go. The same would hold true now. If
someone paid their taxes and was removed they wouldn't get their tax payment
back.

Vale;

Modianus

On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 4:09 PM, Cato <catoinnyc@...> wrote:

>
>
> Cato Fabio Modiano sal.
>
> An interesting addition, and one that has a great deal of merit. The *only*
> hesitation I have is...what if that citizen does something horrific, worthy
> of exile or banishment? Would they simply be returned their payment?
>
> Vale,
>
> Cato
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81898 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2010-11-16
Subject: Re: ORDO EQUESTER - The Solution Needed
Ave,

It is ironic you mentioned this. Metellus and I had this very discussion
yesterday. He supported it and I was against it. Though I guess it manages
to touch on one of the fundamental questions regarding NR. If NR is going
to be viewed as a government, then in my mind, there is no such government
that does a life time tax. If we are going to alter that frame of reference
to say something like the NRA (that was the organization Metellus
referenced) then sure. It just kinda depends on how we view NR.

Respectfully,

Sulla

On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 1:59 PM, David Kling <tau.athanasios@...>wrote:

>
>
> Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus S.P.D.
>
> I too find much merit in the proposal; however, I would like to add one
> thing that I think is VERY needed in Nova Roma. The idea of a lifetime
> "membership/citizenship." A one time flat rate that would entitle a person
> to lifetime assidui status.
>
> Valete;
>
> Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus
>
>
> On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 3:53 PM, Cato <catoinnyc@...<catoinnyc%40gmail.com>>
> wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > Cato Cornelio Lentulo omnibusque in foro SPD
> >
> > I find this idea fascinating.
> >
> > First, let me point out that our Articles of Incorporation would *not*
> need
> > to be amended, as there are only two classes of citizens listed:
> tax-paying
> > (assidui) and non-tax-paying (capite censi); the amount of tax or how it
> is
> > paid is not specified, nor are any other specifications or delineations,
> > those being left to our own law.
> >
> > So the idea that senators - or anyone willing to pay a higher tax rate -
> > could be listed in the Ordo Equester is both historically accurate and a
> > good idea for generating revenue.
> >
> > The concept of the "knights of the public horse", an honor given by the
> > censors, is another exceptionally good idea grounded in historic
> practice.
> >
> > I applaud Cornelius Lentulus and intend to give my full support to this
> > idea.
> >
> > Valete,
> >
> > Cato
> >
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81899 From: GAIUS MARCIUS CRISPUS Date: 2010-11-16
Subject: Re: Certificate - Provinces Britannia and California
--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "luciaiuliaaquila" <luciaiuliaaquila@...> wrote:
>
>>>>> Britannia is in the best hands it could ever hope to be!

Salve Julia, et salvete omnes

Thank you Julia for your kind and glowing remarks. I hope I can live up to them. I greatly appreciate your good wishes.

It has always been my fervent hope that Britannia would once again be able to take a proud place among the ranks of Nova Roma's Provinces, because I believe that is what our citizens deserve.

It may not be easy to get there, and there is much work to do. But I shall do my utmost to make it start to happen. I believe that I shall not be without good support from my fellow citizens, and that, by working and coming together as Roman Britons, we will be able to restore the fellowship and confidence we once had.

I must also send congratulations and best wishes to my newly-appointed fellow Governor in California. Perhaps we will be able to look back together at some future time and, hopefully, be proud of our achievements.

Vale, et valete optime quirites.

Crispus
Legatus pro praetore
Britannia.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81900 From: publiusalbucius Date: 2010-11-16
Subject: Re: ORDO EQUESTER - The Solution Needed
Salvete omnes,

Our forum is *the* place to express ideas, proposals and to use every contribution to go as far as possible.

I am sincerely rejoiced by this new thread.

However, and ever if I may look as the sad-grumbler-consul-with-the-cold-shower-in-the-hand, I think useful, for every one, to draw your attention on the fact that a new ordo equester, as proposed by Lentulus and as we would support it - at least several voices I heard here - would need an appropriate modification of both NR by-laws *and* articles of incorporation.

On these two last points, if, Cato, you have the same Articles of incorporation (Jan. 2, 2001) - and normally, there should not be plenty but one, you may now realize that you may have confused our Articles and our By-laws, which are two different documents, who have different legal status.
Then, we would have to conciliate, the U.S.A. Maine Law, our incorporation Law, with the powers, that we could give our censors, to appoint in an Ordo equester : the solution is not an absolute one, but would depend on how we would organize things (relation with NR Inc. Board, specially...) and would really need a previous study.

Though I know that we are entering in our annual political campaign and that we, and specially our various candidates, may be drawn to adopt enthusiastic positions, let us be, however, cautious! :-)

Valete omnes,


Albucius cos.




--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Cato" <catoinnyc@...> wrote:
>
> Cato Fabio Modiano sal.
>
> An interesting addition, and one that has a great deal of merit. The *only* hesitation I have is...what if that citizen does something horrific, worthy of exile or banishment? Would they simply be returned their payment?
>
> Vale,
>
> Cato
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, David Kling <tau.athanasios@> wrote:
> >
> > Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus S.P.D.
> >
> > I too find much merit in the proposal; however, I would like to add one
> > thing that I think is VERY needed in Nova Roma. The idea of a lifetime
> > "membership/citizenship." A one time flat rate that would entitle a person
> > to lifetime assidui status.
> >
> > Valete;
> >
> > Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus
> >
> > On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 3:53 PM, Cato <catoinnyc@> wrote:
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > Cato Cornelio Lentulo omnibusque in foro SPD
> > >
> > > I find this idea fascinating.
> > >
> > > First, let me point out that our Articles of Incorporation would *not* need
> > > to be amended, as there are only two classes of citizens listed: tax-paying
> > > (assidui) and non-tax-paying (capite censi); the amount of tax or how it is
> > > paid is not specified, nor are any other specifications or delineations,
> > > those being left to our own law.
> > >
> > > So the idea that senators - or anyone willing to pay a higher tax rate -
> > > could be listed in the Ordo Equester is both historically accurate and a
> > > good idea for generating revenue.
> > >
> > > The concept of the "knights of the public horse", an honor given by the
> > > censors, is another exceptionally good idea grounded in historic practice.
> > >
> > > I applaud Cornelius Lentulus and intend to give my full support to this
> > > idea.
> > >
> > > Valete,
> > >
> > > Cato
> > >
> >
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81901 From: Cn. Cornelius Lentulus Date: 2010-11-16
Subject: R: [Nova-Roma] Re: ORDO EQUESTER - The Solution Needed
Lentulus Iuliae Aquilae aedili curuli s. p. d.


I do apologize, honored aedilis curulis, if I interfered with anything you planned! It was not - and could not be - intentional, as this proposal of mine was written in 2005 :) I have only adapted it to the current circumstances, while giving it its current form.

This very same proposal was sent to the forum (with slight modifications) in 2006, 2007, 2008 and 2009; and now, in 2010. Anytime I came out with these suggestions, there was a general applause, and people agreed to it, but as we know how slow everything in NR is, no action ever took place since 2005.

I pray all the Gods, but especially Castor and Pollux, so that finally there could be some historical (any BTW very practical) improvements made on the equestrian order, to render it a real order, filled with the best citizens of Nova Roma. Also, in the same time, solving the problem about a "recognized merchant" status, which shall be a separate issue from the equestrian oder, not excluding the possibility that a "recognized NR merchant" be a knight, or a knight be a merchant.

I apologize again, for not consulting you earlier about this, it was very sudden even to me, as right in the moment when I realized that this item is on the senate's agenda, I give no time for delay, and I posted my message - I thought it could not cause harm to anyone.
I am also sorry for I could not participate in the discussions in the aedilitas mailing list; as I had no special task assigned to me from P. Annaeus Constantinus Placidus, the aedilis who appointed me, I did not visit that mailing list since a while, and I used this time to execute my other NR duties because I had very limited time during the last months. I will do efforts to read everything which was posted since my boss aedilis curulis P. Annaeus Placidus gave me no task.

Cura, ut valeas!


















[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81902 From: luciaiuliaaquila Date: 2010-11-16
Subject: Re: ORDO EQUESTER - The Solution Needed
Ave Albuci Cos, avete omnes,

> However, and ever if I may look as the sad-grumbler-consul-with-the->cold-shower-in-the-hand, I think useful, for every one, to draw your >attention on the fact that a new ordo equester, as proposed by >Lentulus and as we would support it - at least several voices I >heard here - would need an appropriate modification of both NR by->laws *and* articles of incorporation.

I hear ya! I was just thinking I came off a little grumpy myself;)
Actually i am a little frustrated, and it is an effort to lighten my mood, but lighten I shall!

Vale, et valete,

Julia



--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "publiusalbucius" <albucius_aoe@...> wrote:
>
> Salvete omnes,
>
> Our forum is *the* place to express ideas, proposals and to use every contribution to go as far as possible.
>
> I am sincerely rejoiced by this new thread.
>
> However, and ever if I may look as the sad-grumbler-consul-with-the-cold-shower-in-the-hand, I think useful, for every one, to draw your attention on the fact that a new ordo equester, as proposed by Lentulus and as we would support it - at least several voices I heard here - would need an appropriate modification of both NR by-laws *and* articles of incorporation.
>
> On these two last points, if, Cato, you have the same Articles of incorporation (Jan. 2, 2001) - and normally, there should not be plenty but one, you may now realize that you may have confused our Articles and our By-laws, which are two different documents, who have different legal status.
> Then, we would have to conciliate, the U.S.A. Maine Law, our incorporation Law, with the powers, that we could give our censors, to appoint in an Ordo equester : the solution is not an absolute one, but would depend on how we would organize things (relation with NR Inc. Board, specially...) and would really need a previous study.
>
> Though I know that we are entering in our annual political campaign and that we, and specially our various candidates, may be drawn to adopt enthusiastic positions, let us be, however, cautious! :-)
>
> Valete omnes,
>
>
> Albucius cos.
>
>
>
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Cato" <catoinnyc@> wrote:
> >
> > Cato Fabio Modiano sal.
> >
> > An interesting addition, and one that has a great deal of merit. The *only* hesitation I have is...what if that citizen does something horrific, worthy of exile or banishment? Would they simply be returned their payment?
> >
> > Vale,
> >
> > Cato
> >
> > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, David Kling <tau.athanasios@> wrote:
> > >
> > > Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus S.P.D.
> > >
> > > I too find much merit in the proposal; however, I would like to add one
> > > thing that I think is VERY needed in Nova Roma. The idea of a lifetime
> > > "membership/citizenship." A one time flat rate that would entitle a person
> > > to lifetime assidui status.
> > >
> > > Valete;
> > >
> > > Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus
> > >
> > > On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 3:53 PM, Cato <catoinnyc@> wrote:
> > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Cato Cornelio Lentulo omnibusque in foro SPD
> > > >
> > > > I find this idea fascinating.
> > > >
> > > > First, let me point out that our Articles of Incorporation would *not* need
> > > > to be amended, as there are only two classes of citizens listed: tax-paying
> > > > (assidui) and non-tax-paying (capite censi); the amount of tax or how it is
> > > > paid is not specified, nor are any other specifications or delineations,
> > > > those being left to our own law.
> > > >
> > > > So the idea that senators - or anyone willing to pay a higher tax rate -
> > > > could be listed in the Ordo Equester is both historically accurate and a
> > > > good idea for generating revenue.
> > > >
> > > > The concept of the "knights of the public horse", an honor given by the
> > > > censors, is another exceptionally good idea grounded in historic practice.
> > > >
> > > > I applaud Cornelius Lentulus and intend to give my full support to this
> > > > idea.
> > > >
> > > > Valete,
> > > >
> > > > Cato
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> > >
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81903 From: Cato Date: 2010-11-16
Subject: Re: ORDO EQUESTER - The Solution Needed
Cato Fabio Modiano sal.

True enough, but I'm thinking that a "lifetime" citizenship fee would be substantially larger than the US$15 or so that is paid now. I get your point, however; maybe it could be made clear that the fee would be non-refundable and non-returnable, etc.

Vale,

Cato

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, David Kling <tau.athanasios@...> wrote:
>
> Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus Catoni salutem dicit
>
> I would say they would forfeit whatever was paid. If their citizenship is
> forcably removed then they would go. The same would hold true now. If
> someone paid their taxes and was removed they wouldn't get their tax payment
> back.
>
> Vale;
>
> Modianus
>
> On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 4:09 PM, Cato <catoinnyc@...> wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > Cato Fabio Modiano sal.
> >
> > An interesting addition, and one that has a great deal of merit. The *only*
> > hesitation I have is...what if that citizen does something horrific, worthy
> > of exile or banishment? Would they simply be returned their payment?
> >
> > Vale,
> >
> > Cato
> >
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81904 From: David Kling Date: 2010-11-16
Subject: Re: ORDO EQUESTER - The Solution Needed
Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus Sullae salutem dicit

I see your point; however, we can define our self since we are a phenomenon
unique to our self. The senate declared we are a "*Res Publica*" or "*
Civitas*" and not simply an organization, and as such we are to be viewed
(at least to my understanding) as a government, and a government can set its
own standards. So if we wanted to establish a "lifetime" tax we could;
whether or not no other government has done so. We define our self. I have
always liked viewing Nova Roma as more than just an organization.

Vale;

Modianus

On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 4:22 PM, Robert Woolwine
<robert.woolwine@...>wrote:

> Ave,
>
> It is ironic you mentioned this. Metellus and I had this very discussion
> yesterday. He supported it and I was against it. Though I guess it
> manages
> to touch on one of the fundamental questions regarding NR. If NR is going
> to be viewed as a government, then in my mind, there is no such government
> that does a life time tax. If we are going to alter that frame of
> reference
> to say something like the NRA (that was the organization Metellus
> referenced) then sure. It just kinda depends on how we view NR.
>
> Respectfully,
>
> Sulla
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81905 From: luciaiuliaaquila Date: 2010-11-16
Subject: Re: Thanksgiving Invitation
Ave Sulla,

Well, as we say here in the south, sounds like "good eatin'!"
I truly doubt I will make it but thank you and with the deepest sincerity I wish you all a very wonderful and warm Thanksgiving.

Vale et habe fortuna bona!
In amicitia

Julia

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Robert Woolwine <robert.woolwine@...> wrote:
>
> Ave!
>
> Time? Umm...Traditionally we start around 2 pm.
> Dress Code would be informal and casual.
> Menu is being worked on currently. My secretary is bringing some side
> dishes. Metellus was talking about cooking two turkeys and a Ham (I wont
> touch the ham) LOL Metellus also has an idea about side dishes too - him
> and Tink are from the South and they can cook! ;)
>
> I will just sit back and watch Dallas lose again on TV. LOL
>
> Vale,
>
> Sulla
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81906 From: Cato Date: 2010-11-16
Subject: Re: ORDO EQUESTER - The Solution Needed
Cato Memmio Albucio consule omnibusque in foro SPD

Consul, the latest - and current - Articles of Incorporation are those that were amended in 2756 AUC (AD 2003); these show *only* tax-paying and non-tax-paying citizenships.

Vale et valete,

Cato
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81907 From: David Kling Date: 2010-11-16
Subject: Re: ORDO EQUESTER - The Solution Needed
Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus Catoni salutem dicit

I know that my Masonic lodge has a lifetime dues of about $600 and that goes
into a fund where the interest is used to pay the annual dues for the
person's lifetime. Annual Masonic dues are typically much more than $15.
So I would think between $200 - $300 would cover a lifetime
assidui/citizenship. That would be what I would recommend, and considering
many people only stay a few years and leave it might be a good investment
for Nova Roma to consider -- and it wouldn't require a by-law or major
legislation.

Vale;

Modianus

On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 4:55 PM, Cato <catoinnyc@...> wrote:

>
>
> Cato Fabio Modiano sal.
>
> True enough, but I'm thinking that a "lifetime" citizenship fee would be
> substantially larger than the US$15 or so that is paid now. I get your
> point, however; maybe it could be made clear that the fee would be
> non-refundable and non-returnable, etc.
>
>
> Vale,
>
> Cato
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81908 From: luciaiuliaaquila Date: 2010-11-16
Subject: R: [Nova-Roma] Re: ORDO EQUESTER - The Solution Needed
Iulia Cornelio Lentulo Pontifici,

Most honorable Pontifex - I realize I sounded a bit short but it was because your plan has merit and that your fellow scribae, and myself, could greatly benefit from your input.
I value your input immensely and know that your good influence and ideas would benefit the rest of the cohors many of whom are newer citizens and are also some of the brightest and hard working. We have such a short time and with the Ludi taking up a great amount of that time we have only a scant seven weeks left to work. Hopefully we can lay a foundation and someone in the cohors, or even you and I, can continue next year working with the new magistrates in their cohors or special task forces.
I only wish now I had a full year to work on this most noble of initiatives.

Let us work together to provide some sort of continuity for next year,

Cura ut valeas, semper...

Julia


--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Cn. Cornelius Lentulus" <cn_corn_lent@...> wrote:
>
> Lentulus Iuliae Aquilae aedili curuli s. p. d.
>
>
> I do apologize, honored aedilis curulis, if I interfered with anything you planned! It was not - and could not be - intentional, as this proposal of mine was written in 2005 :) I have only adapted it to the current circumstances, while giving it its current form.
>
> This very same proposal was sent to the forum (with slight modifications) in 2006, 2007, 2008 and 2009; and now, in 2010. Anytime I came out with these suggestions, there was a general applause, and people agreed to it, but as we know how slow everything in NR is, no action ever took place since 2005.
>
> I pray all the Gods, but especially Castor and Pollux, so that finally there could be some historical (any BTW very practical) improvements made on the equestrian order, to render it a real order, filled with the best citizens of Nova Roma. Also, in the same time, solving the problem about a "recognized merchant" status, which shall be a separate issue from the equestrian oder, not excluding the possibility that a "recognized NR merchant" be a knight, or a knight be a merchant.
>
> I apologize again, for not consulting you earlier about this, it was very sudden even to me, as right in the moment when I realized that this item is on the senate's agenda, I give no time for delay, and I posted my message - I thought it could not cause harm to anyone.
> I am also sorry for I could not participate in the discussions in the aedilitas mailing list; as I had no special task assigned to me from P. Annaeus Constantinus Placidus, the aedilis who appointed me, I did not visit that mailing list since a while, and I used this time to execute my other NR duties because I had very limited time during the last months. I will do efforts to read everything which was posted since my boss aedilis curulis P. Annaeus Placidus gave me no task.
>
> Cura, ut valeas!
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81909 From: Cato Date: 2010-11-16
Subject: Re: ORDO EQUESTER - The Solution Needed
Cato omnibus in foro SPD

This actually underlines the importance of separating our Constitution and tabularium (which taken together I'll call the "Tabularium") from our macronational by-laws.

While we will *always* be answerable to the specific laws under which we are incorporated and the country in which we are incorporated, by separating the two sets of legal instruments we escape a great deal of conflict.

Under Maine law (and US law), public organizations are required to adhere to a very general set of standards; where State and Federal law do not make specific standards we are free to create our own - in fact, after separating the macronational by-laws from the Tabularium, in almost every case the words "as provided by applicable law" within our Tabularium opens up a great deal of opportunity to mold it to the ancient processes we use.

It's a two-tired system:

On top you have the Maine Non Profit Corporation Act (Title 13-B). This governs us as a corporation and is fully in line with Federal and State law. Our Articles of Incorporation fall directly under it, as well as a set of by-laws. Within these general by-laws, and Title 13-B, we are given the opportunity to name processes by which we will be running the actual day-to-day business of the Respublica by naming our Tabularium (to consist of both the Constitution and the rest of the body of leges) as our "applicable law".

In other words, Title 13-B repeatedly says "unless otherwise provided by the articles of incorporation or bylaws", and naming our Tabularium ("applicable law")in our macronational by-laws serves as the "otherwise provided" part.

So the second tier is our Tabularium, the "applicable law" which we reference in our by-laws. In the Tabularium we set the tax rate, the orders of plebeians and patricians, all the details of the powers of magistrates and comitia, etc., necessary to function as a Respublica.

Separated, the macronational by-laws conform to Title 13-B, and they point to the Tabularium as the internal measures we use to define ourselves and our processes under the law.

I hope this makes sense :)

Valete,

Cato



--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Cato" <catoinnyc@...> wrote:
>
> Cato Memmio Albucio consule omnibusque in foro SPD
>
> Consul, the latest - and current - Articles of Incorporation are those that were amended in 2756 AUC (AD 2003); these show *only* tax-paying and non-tax-paying citizenships.
>
> Vale et valete,
>
> Cato
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81910 From: Cato Date: 2010-11-16
Subject: Re: ORDO EQUESTER - The Solution Needed
Cato Fabio Modiano sal.

True enough; it would just take a lex, especially as it would be voluntary.

Vale,

Cato

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, David Kling <tau.athanasios@...> wrote:
>
> Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus Catoni salutem dicit
>
> I know that my Masonic lodge has a lifetime dues of about $600 and that goes
> into a fund where the interest is used to pay the annual dues for the
> person's lifetime. Annual Masonic dues are typically much more than $15.
> So I would think between $200 - $300 would cover a lifetime
> assidui/citizenship. That would be what I would recommend, and considering
> many people only stay a few years and leave it might be a good investment
> for Nova Roma to consider -- and it wouldn't require a by-law or major
> legislation.
>
> Vale;
>
> Modianus
>
> On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 4:55 PM, Cato <catoinnyc@...> wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > Cato Fabio Modiano sal.
> >
> > True enough, but I'm thinking that a "lifetime" citizenship fee would be
> > substantially larger than the US$15 or so that is paid now. I get your
> > point, however; maybe it could be made clear that the fee would be
> > non-refundable and non-returnable, etc.
> >
> >
> > Vale,
> >
> > Cato
> >
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81911 From: luciaiuliaaquila Date: 2010-11-16
Subject: Re: ORDO EQUESTER - The Solution Needed
Iulia Modiano Catoni sal,

I caution against assigning arbitrary numbers to dues, or to Eques taxes/donation, for example. There are very few Novi Romani who are wealthy enough to afford such high dues, research is required. As we have done with our tax system.

In the years I have been in Nova Roma I have observed that many are "retired" (includes disability), many do not hold high paying jobs, some are students, quite a few find themselves jobless due to the economy and some work sporadically. We are not a wealthy nation.

It needs research. This cannot be done arbitrarily.

Right now I do not support a lifetime membership - it breeds stagnation and indifference. Look at the Senate - how many of them come down and walk in the forum? Even if their names are being mentioned? They may show up to vote and in my opinion no longer have their fingers on the pulse of the Respublica.
They do not fully represent the citizens.
Come to think of that, the Senate needs some revamping.

Let's not yield to the pressure of wanting to do something before the year ends but take time to foster the wisdom of patience and attention to detail, even if a total solution is not met until the coming year.

Vale bene,

Julia

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, David Kling <tau.athanasios@...> wrote:
>
> Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus Catoni salutem dicit
>
> I know that my Masonic lodge has a lifetime dues of about $600 and that goes
> into a fund where the interest is used to pay the annual dues for the
> person's lifetime. Annual Masonic dues are typically much more than $15.
> So I would think between $200 - $300 would cover a lifetime
> assidui/citizenship. That would be what I would recommend, and considering
> many people only stay a few years and leave it might be a good investment
> for Nova Roma to consider -- and it wouldn't require a by-law or major
> legislation.
>
> Vale;
>
> Modianus
>
> On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 4:55 PM, Cato <catoinnyc@...> wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > Cato Fabio Modiano sal.
> >
> > True enough, but I'm thinking that a "lifetime" citizenship fee would be
> > substantially larger than the US$15 or so that is paid now. I get your
> > point, however; maybe it could be made clear that the fee would be
> > non-refundable and non-returnable, etc.
> >
> >
> > Vale,
> >
> > Cato
> >
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81912 From: GAIUS MARCIUS CRISPUS Date: 2010-11-16
Subject: Re: ORDO EQUESTER - The Solution Needed
--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, David Kling <tau.athanasios@...> wrote:
>>> ...... I know that my Masonic lodge has a lifetime dues of about $600 and that goes
> into a fund where the interest is used to pay the annual dues for the
> person's lifetime. Annual Masonic dues are typically much more than $15.

Salvete omnes

I think you must enjoy far lower fees than we do. London Lodges charge about £130 sterling for just 4 meetings per year, and that does not include dining. That is roughly $200 per year. On that basis almost no one could afford a lifetime subscription.

The other membership organisation to which I belong, The Most Venerable Order of the Hospital of St. John of Jerusalem (a Royal order of chivalry) see http://www.orderofstjohn.org/ charges annual "Oblations" (fees) that can be "commuted" (a lifetime subscription). Here the cost is calculated using a scale based on life expectancy. So someone in their twenties would be asked to pay about 40 times the annual fee, someone in their seventies would be charged about 4 times the annual rate. Very few members commute.


Valete optime
Crispus

.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81913 From: C.Maria Caeca Date: 2010-11-16
Subject: Re: ORDO EQUESTER - The Solution Needed
C. Maria Caeca Cn. Cornelio Lentulo Pontifici omnibusque in foro S. P. D.

I am quite impressed with this proposal, and think that it has enough merit that it should be studied most seriously, with an eye to either adopting it in toto or refining it (hopefully with the input of its creator), and implementing it as soon as is feasible.

While I certainly don't think that our AoI, constitution or bylaws should be amended casually or frivilously, I do think that, should we find it to our advantage to do so, we should, and without hesitation, given, naturally, that we ensure that we do not create or add to conflicts with State of ME or US requirements, and that we don't do something which will have unintended consequences which would either adversely affect us or put us at a disadvantage. this cannot be a matter handled immediately, or without careful thought and planning, but, at the very least, I think it provides an excellent foundation on which we can build, and a framework which we can use to create that which will meet our needs *and* bring us closer to reflecting the Roman institutions we have set ourselves to emulate.

In passing, I'd just like to comment that is is encouraging to come to at least 3 ideas on which I can comment, and none of them are destructive or contentious! I applaud the seeming change in the wind, and hope it bodes fair for our prospering.

Cura ut valeas,
Vale et valete quam optime!

C. Maria Caeca, cives et quaestrix

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81914 From: C.Maria Caeca Date: 2010-11-16
Subject: Re: Senate Session Report/ I. Nov. 2763/TRIB. ROTA
C. Maria Caeca C. Aquilio Rotae Tribunis Plebis S. P. D.

In this report, when reporting the votes you used abbreviations with which I am unfamiliar, and I read all tribunition repots carefully, and have done, since I became a citizen. I understand that "VR" is a "yes" vote, but what do the initials *after* the "VR" represent? Could you provide us with a list of these abbreviations and their meanings, so that we can better understand the actions of our Senate?

Gratias tibi ago,
Vale quam optime,
C. Maria Caeca

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81915 From: C.Maria Caeca Date: 2010-11-16
Subject: Re: statement of intent
Salve Julia, Amica mea!

You are most kind, and I think you for the good wishes!

Vale quam optime!
Maria

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81916 From: Cato Date: 2010-11-16
Subject: Re: ORDO EQUESTER - The Solution Needed
Cato Iuliae Aquilae sal.

I agree; this idea is something to look at *after* we have set ourselves on the right track again.

I do think that it's good to toss things out like this so that citizens can get a feel for what may or may not be possible. Every citizen should be involved - I note your commentary on the Senate - in our future together, which I know you feel as well.

Vale,

Cato

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "luciaiuliaaquila" <luciaiuliaaquila@...> wrote:
>
> Iulia Modiano Catoni sal,
>
> I caution against assigning arbitrary numbers to dues, or to Eques taxes/donation, for example. There are very few Novi Romani who are wealthy enough to afford such high dues, research is required. As we have done with our tax system.
>
> In the years I have been in Nova Roma I have observed that many are "retired" (includes disability), many do not hold high paying jobs, some are students, quite a few find themselves jobless due to the economy and some work sporadically. We are not a wealthy nation.
>
> It needs research. This cannot be done arbitrarily.
>
> Right now I do not support a lifetime membership - it breeds stagnation and indifference. Look at the Senate - how many of them come down and walk in the forum? Even if their names are being mentioned? They may show up to vote and in my opinion no longer have their fingers on the pulse of the Respublica.
> They do not fully represent the citizens.
> Come to think of that, the Senate needs some revamping.
>
> Let's not yield to the pressure of wanting to do something before the year ends but take time to foster the wisdom of patience and attention to detail, even if a total solution is not met until the coming year.
>
> Vale bene,
>
> Julia
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, David Kling <tau.athanasios@> wrote:
> >
> > Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus Catoni salutem dicit
> >
> > I know that my Masonic lodge has a lifetime dues of about $600 and that goes
> > into a fund where the interest is used to pay the annual dues for the
> > person's lifetime. Annual Masonic dues are typically much more than $15.
> > So I would think between $200 - $300 would cover a lifetime
> > assidui/citizenship. That would be what I would recommend, and considering
> > many people only stay a few years and leave it might be a good investment
> > for Nova Roma to consider -- and it wouldn't require a by-law or major
> > legislation.
> >
> > Vale;
> >
> > Modianus
> >
> > On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 4:55 PM, Cato <catoinnyc@> wrote:
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > Cato Fabio Modiano sal.
> > >
> > > True enough, but I'm thinking that a "lifetime" citizenship fee would be
> > > substantially larger than the US$15 or so that is paid now. I get your
> > > point, however; maybe it could be made clear that the fee would be
> > > non-refundable and non-returnable, etc.
> > >
> > >
> > > Vale,
> > >
> > > Cato
> > >
> >
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81917 From: Cato Date: 2010-11-16
Subject: Re: Senate Session Report/ I. Nov. 2763/TRIB. ROTA
Cato Mariae Caecae sal.

If I may:

"VR" stands for "uti rogas" (or "VTI ROGAS") - a vote that it should be done, or a "yes" vote.

"Abs" is an abstention from voting.

"A" is for "antiquo" (or "ANTIQVO") - a vote that things should stay the way they were, or a "no" vote.

Hope that helps :)

Vale,

Cato



--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "C.Maria Caeca" <c.mariacaeca@...> wrote:
>
> C. Maria Caeca C. Aquilio Rotae Tribunis Plebis S. P. D.
>
> In this report, when reporting the votes you used abbreviations with which I am unfamiliar, and I read all tribunition repots carefully, and have done, since I became a citizen. I understand that "VR" is a "yes" vote, but what do the initials *after* the "VR" represent? Could you provide us with a list of these abbreviations and their meanings, so that we can better understand the actions of our Senate?
>
> Gratias tibi ago,
> Vale quam optime,
> C. Maria Caeca
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81918 From: luciaiuliaaquila Date: 2010-11-16
Subject: Re: ORDO EQUESTER - The Solution Needed
Iulia Catoni sal,

It is going to take a lot of work next year - I know we both will work towards that end as will many other citizens.

> I do think that it's good to toss things out like this so that >citizens can get a feel for what may or may not be possible. Every >citizen should be involved - I note your commentary on the Senate - >in our future together, which I know you feel as well.

Pulchre dixisti et tibi assentior.

Vale bene,

Julia

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Cato" <catoinnyc@...> wrote:
>
> Cato Iuliae Aquilae sal.
>
> I agree; this idea is something to look at *after* we have set ourselves on the right track again.
>
> I do think that it's good to toss things out like this so that citizens can get a feel for what may or may not be possible. Every citizen should be involved - I note your commentary on the Senate - in our future together, which I know you feel as well.
>
> Vale,
>
> Cato
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "luciaiuliaaquila" <luciaiuliaaquila@> wrote:
> >
> > Iulia Modiano Catoni sal,
> >
> > I caution against assigning arbitrary numbers to dues, or to Eques taxes/donation, for example. There are very few Novi Romani who are wealthy enough to afford such high dues, research is required. As we have done with our tax system.
> >
> > In the years I have been in Nova Roma I have observed that many are "retired" (includes disability), many do not hold high paying jobs, some are students, quite a few find themselves jobless due to the economy and some work sporadically. We are not a wealthy nation.
> >
> > It needs research. This cannot be done arbitrarily.
> >
> > Right now I do not support a lifetime membership - it breeds stagnation and indifference. Look at the Senate - how many of them come down and walk in the forum? Even if their names are being mentioned? They may show up to vote and in my opinion no longer have their fingers on the pulse of the Respublica.
> > They do not fully represent the citizens.
> > Come to think of that, the Senate needs some revamping.
> >
> > Let's not yield to the pressure of wanting to do something before the year ends but take time to foster the wisdom of patience and attention to detail, even if a total solution is not met until the coming year.
> >
> > Vale bene,
> >
> > Julia
> >
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81919 From: C.Maria Caeca Date: 2010-11-16
Subject: Re: Senate Session Report/ I. Nov. 2763/TRIB. ROTA
Caeca Catoni sal,

Um ...that much I knew, actually, Senator. But after the "VR" votes, there were several initials, such as T, and some others which I have never seen before, and it was those about which I was, and am, inquiring, thanks.

Vale,
C. Maria Caeca

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81920 From: luciaiuliaaquila Date: 2010-11-16
Subject: Re: Senate Session Report/ I. Nov. 2763/TRIB. ROTA
Ave amica,

It is because rather than adding a space between the prior Senator's vote and the name of the next Senator he used a backslash... so what you are getting is the first initial of the next Senator...

Julia

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "C.Maria Caeca" <c.mariacaeca@...> wrote:
>
> Caeca Catoni sal,
>
> Um ...that much I knew, actually, Senator. But after the "VR" votes, there were several initials, such as T, and some others which I have never seen before, and it was those about which I was, and am, inquiring, thanks.
>
> Vale,
> C. Maria Caeca
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81921 From: Tragedienne Date: 2010-11-16
Subject: Re: Thanksgiving Invitation
Aeternia Sullae Iuliae Aquilae S.P.D.


It's true Tinca can throwdown in the kitchen, and all whon are attending this year can rejoice, I'll be making my almost-famous guacamole.


Vale Optime,
Aeternia

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Robert Woolwine <robert.woolwine@...> wrote:
>
> Ave!
>
> Time? Umm...Traditionally we start around 2 pm.
> Dress Code would be informal and casual.
> Menu is being worked on currently. My secretary is bringing some side
> dishes. Metellus was talking about cooking two turkeys and a Ham (I wont
> touch the ham) LOL Metellus also has an idea about side dishes too - him
> and Tink are from the South and they can cook! ;)
>
> I will just sit back and watch Dallas lose again on TV. LOL
>
> Vale,
>
> Sulla
>
> On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 1:14 PM, luciaiuliaaquila <
> luciaiuliaaquila@...> wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > Ave Sulla,
> >
> > What time is dinner? Dress code? Menu?
> > I should be back from my sojourn by then, btw, you wouldn't be providing
> > transportation from Tennessee wouldja?
> > *laughs*
> > Gratias to you, Aeternia and Metellus, 'tis a very kind gesture and if I
> > was in the area I would surely stop by!
> >
> > Vale bene,
> >
> > Julia
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81922 From: C.Maria Caeca Date: 2010-11-16
Subject: Re: Senate Session Report/ I. Nov. 2763/TRIB. ROTA
Salve Julia!

AHA!!!!! Mystery solved! My screen reader sees fit not to read such things as back slashes, so I thought that suddenly there were yes votes with abbreviated qualifications that I should probably understand. OK, got it, and thank you!

Vale bene,
Maria

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81923 From: David Kling Date: 2010-11-16
Subject: Re: ORDO EQUESTER - The Solution Needed
Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus Gaio Marcio Crispo salutem dicit

My Blue Lodge has dues of $50 per year. There are some "traditional
observance" lodges here in the US that are charging significantly higher
dues than the typical lodge. I often struggle with the dues, especially
since my lodge is not close to where I live -- I need to join a local lodge
and get involved -- but I have not yet since being in graduate school.

Vale;

Modianus

On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 6:01 PM, GAIUS MARCIUS CRISPUS <
jbshr1pwa@...> wrote:

>
>
>
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com <Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com>, David
> Kling <tau.athanasios@...> wrote:
> >>> ...... I know that my Masonic lodge has a lifetime dues of about $600
> and that goes
>
> > into a fund where the interest is used to pay the annual dues for the
> > person's lifetime. Annual Masonic dues are typically much more than $15.
>
> Salvete omnes
>
> I think you must enjoy far lower fees than we do. London Lodges charge
> about £130 sterling for just 4 meetings per year, and that does not include
> dining. That is roughly $200 per year. On that basis almost no one could
> afford a lifetime subscription.
>
> The other membership organisation to which I belong, The Most Venerable
> Order of the Hospital of St. John of Jerusalem (a Royal order of chivalry)
> see http://www.orderofstjohn.org/ charges annual "Oblations" (fees) that
> can be "commuted" (a lifetime subscription). Here the cost is calculated
> using a scale based on life expectancy. So someone in their twenties would
> be asked to pay about 40 times the annual fee, someone in their seventies
> would be charged about 4 times the annual rate. Very few members commute.
>
> Valete optime
> Crispus
>
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81924 From: petronius_dexter Date: 2010-11-16
Subject: Re: ORDO EQUESTER - The Solution Needed
C. Petronius omnibus forensibus s.p.d.,

I wonder if to create an ordo equester may be a good idea. Yes in antiqua Roma there was this order but we know that this minority of citizens wanted have all things of the res publica and finally made the mess making poorer all citizens farmers and colons, self living on the products of their own, untill to create civilian wars and imperial power.

Dividing people in 2 ordines, 1 the great majority without powers and anything and 2 a minority with all powers and honores is not a good thing to recreate, in my opinion. Dividing people on money, is historical, indeed, but is it necessary and efficient? I am not sure about.

Valete quam optime.

C. Petronius Dexter
Arcoiali scribebat
a. d. XV Kalendas Decembres P. Memmio K. Fabio II coss.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81925 From: iulius sabinus Date: 2010-11-16
Subject: Re: ORDO EQUESTER - The Solution Needed
SALVE DEXTER ET SALVETE!
 
Some of us - but I let them to present themselves if want - advocate for an Order Equester based of the century points resulted from the voluntary work for NR. It's more equitable in modern times and more in line with the needs of a voluntary organization.
Money can be raised from taxes and other.
I will not vehement sustain my point against other proposals; I only let the door open to other possibilities to be investigated. Voluntary work as an expression of the necessary wealth to belong to Ordo Equester is one of these possibilities.
 
VALE ET VALETE,
Sabinus

"Every individual is the architect of his own fortune" - Appius Claudius

--- On Wed, 11/17/10, petronius_dexter <jfarnoud94@...> wrote:


From: petronius_dexter <jfarnoud94@...>
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: ORDO EQUESTER - The Solution Needed
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Date: Wednesday, November 17, 2010, 6:26 AM


 



C. Petronius omnibus forensibus s.p.d.,

I wonder if to create an ordo equester may be a good idea. Yes in antiqua Roma there was this order but we know that this minority of citizens wanted have all things of the res publica and finally made the mess making poorer all citizens farmers and colons, self living on the products of their own, untill to create civilian wars and imperial power.

Dividing people in 2 ordines, 1 the great majority without powers and anything and 2 a minority with all powers and honores is not a good thing to recreate, in my opinion. Dividing people on money, is historical, indeed, but is it necessary and efficient? I am not sure about.

Valete quam optime.

C. Petronius Dexter
Arcoiali scribebat
a. d. XV Kalendas Decembres P. Memmio K. Fabio II coss.











[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81926 From: C.Maria Caeca Date: 2010-11-17
Subject: Senate Item IX, creation of a new forum
C. Maria Caeca omnibus in foro S. P. D.

I have some questions and concerns about item IX, just passed by the Senate.
It may, at this point, be an exercise in futility to speak of these things,
since the item has been passed, but, as I have been known to tilt at the
occasional windmill, I shall do so, to have my concerns on record, if for no
other reason.

I am not sure, exactly, what the rationale is for creating another list
specifically for guests and non-citizens. What does the Senate hope to
accomplish by doing this? True, such a list would, most likely be less
contentious, simply because it would not discuss matters pertinent to the
running of the Res Publica, and true, it could be used to educate
non-citizens in Nova Roman matters ...but, it would also isolate guests and
non-citizens from being able to observe our Res Publica at work ...or not
working, as the case may be, and this concerns me. When I first joined NR,
one of the things that interested me, and one of the reasons I pursued my
citizenship, was that I was able, even when I barely understood what I was
observing, to watch the Republic function. Much of what I read was
confusing ...especially the more technical material ...and I often sought
explanations (and got them) from the members of the Newroman list.
Gradually, I sorted things out, so that, by the time I took and passed my
citizenship test, I had a solid beginning of a basic knowledge of how we
functioned, which office (and magistrate) was responsible for what, who the
"leading lights" of the Republic were, and in some cases, impressions as to
why, and I could, and did, move gradually from curious observer to active
citizen. Frankly, had I been isolated on a "non-citizens" list, I suspect
this process would have taken much longer, or not occurred at all.
therefore, it is my hope that, when a non-citizen applies for, and receives
probational citizenship, that person will be permitted to join the list for
citizens, so that practical learning can take place. If we isolate our
potential citizens, we run the risk of having new citizens who will need
considerably more time before they can even begin to become active and
contributing.

Will citizens be able to join and contribute to the list for non-citizens
and guests, or will that privilege be limited to specific people chosen by
...who? I have found that getting to know potential citizens before they
become citizens is often valuable, and (though perhaps I overestimate my
efforts) I think I may have been of some help to those who are considering
citizenship by answering some basic questions, and showing them, privately
and publicly, the "human" face of the Res Publica ..in other words, trying
to make new people feel comfortable and valued. This cannot happen if we
are not allowed to interact.

Cura ut valeas,
C. Maria Caeca
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81927 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2010-11-17
Subject: Re: Senate Session Report/ I. Nov. 2763/TRIB. ROTA
>
>
> A. Tullia Scholastica C. Mariae Caecae C. Aquillio Rotae quiritibus bonae
> voluntatis S.P.D.
>
>
> C. Maria Caeca C. Aquilio Rotae Tribunis Plebis S. P. D.
>
> In this report, when reporting the votes you used abbreviations with which I
> am unfamiliar, and I read all tribunition repots carefully, and have done,
> since I became a citizen. I understand that "VR" is a "yes" vote, but what do
> the initials *after* the "VR" represent? Could you provide us with a list of
> these abbreviations and their meanings, so that we can better understand the
> actions of our Senate?
>
> ATS: As subsequently noted, a backslash was used to separate the votes,
> resulting in the initial of the vote being followed by that of the next
> person¹s praenomen. Instead of using the normal words, we were asked to use
> these abbreviations. In addition, none of the comments that Marinus and I
> (and perhaps others) added were included in the report. I hope that these
> will be inserted, and that in the future consideration for our citizens will
> take precedence over a desire for brevity. Our remarks belong in the
> tribune¹s report (perhaps he was instructed to remove them), and our normal
> voting method using the full phrases uti rogas, abstineo, and antiquo, not
> just initials, should be restored. Surely in our shrunken Senate this cannot
> be too difficult.
>
> Gratias tibi ago,
> Vale quam optime,
> C. Maria Caeca
>
> Valete.
>
>
>
>
>




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81928 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2010-11-17
Subject: Re: ORDO EQUESTER - The Solution Needed
>
> A. Tullia Scholastica T. Julio Sabino quiritibus bonae voluntatis S.P.D.
>
>
>
> SALVE DEXTER ET SALVETE!
>  
> Some of us - but I let them to present themselves if want - advocate for an
> Order Equester based of the century points resulted from the voluntary work
> for NR. It's more equitable in modern times and more in line with the needs of
> a voluntary organization.
>
> ATS: I agree. This is the coin of the realm here. We should not impose
> anything like a means test on anyone above and beyond the basic tax assessed
> at a percentage of GDP or whatever; merchants should, however, contribute
> something to NR for the privilege of doing business with our citizens. The
> question is what amount or percentage would be just, not merely an enhancement
> to the treasury. We are not here to make money, though the merchants must,
> and should be able to contribute something. I also see no reason why the Ordo
> should be restricted to merchants; those of us who contribute much of our time
> here might well deserve inclusion among the equestrians.
>
>
> Money can be raised from taxes and other.
>
> ATS: Yes, if they are assessed at a just level, not ones which constitute
> pocket change for billionaires.
>
> I will not vehement sustain my point against other proposals; I only let the
> door open to other possibilities to be investigated. Voluntary work as an
> expression of the necessary wealth to belong to Ordo Equester is one of these
> possibilities.
>
> ATS: The Ordo Equester clearly needs revision as well as oversight, but
> we should not deter people from trading with our citizens by imposing
> confiscatory fees and / or requirements involving violations of privacy, such
> as having to provide tax returns. Some good sense, and some compassion, are
> in order. Broadening the membership to include non-merchants seems to be a
> good idea, and apparently is in keeping with ancient practice.
>
>  
> VALE ET VALETE,
> Sabinus
>
>
> Vale et valete.
>
>
>
>
> "Every individual is the architect of his own fortune" - Appius Claudius
>
> --- On Wed, 11/17/10, petronius_dexter <jfarnoud94@...
> <mailto:jfarnoud94%40yahoo.fr> > wrote:
>
> From: petronius_dexter <jfarnoud94@... <mailto:jfarnoud94%40yahoo.fr> >
> Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: ORDO EQUESTER - The Solution Needed
> To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com <mailto:Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com>
> Date: Wednesday, November 17, 2010, 6:26 AM
>
>  
>
> C. Petronius omnibus forensibus s.p.d.,
>
> I wonder if to create an ordo equester may be a good idea. Yes in antiqua Roma
> there was this order but we know that this minority of citizens wanted have
> all things of the res publica and finally made the mess making poorer all
> citizens farmers and colons, self living on the products of their own, untill
> to create civilian wars and imperial power.
>
> Dividing people in 2 ordines, 1 the great majority without powers and anything
> and 2 a minority with all powers and honores is not a good thing to recreate,
> in my opinion. Dividing people on money, is historical, indeed, but is it
> necessary and efficient? I am not sure about.
>
> Valete quam optime.
>
> C. Petronius Dexter
> Arcoiali scribebat
> a. d. XV Kalendas Decembres P. Memmio K. Fabio II coss.
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81929 From: Cato Date: 2010-11-17
Subject: a.d XV Kal. Dec.
Cato omnibus in foro SPD

Hodiernus dies est ante diem XV Kalendas Decembris; haec dies comitialis est.

"So they formed a compact to lend aid to one another in case any one
of them should be wronged in any particular; and they took oaths to
this effect and forthwith elected from their own number two
representatives — and afterward still more — in order that each class
might have a helper and avenger. And this they did not once only, but
the idea now conceived in this form kept growing, and they appointed
their representative for a year, as to some office. The men were
called in the tongue of the Latins tribuni — the same name that was
given to the commanders of a thousand — but were styled demarchoi
[leaders of the people] in the Greek language.

In order, however, to distinguish between the titles of the tribunes,
they added in the one case the phrase 'of the soldiers', and in the
other the phrase 'of the people'. Now these tribunes of the people
became responsible for great evils that befell Rome. For though they
did not immediately secure the title of magistrates, they gained
power beyond all others, defending every one who begged protection
and rescuing every one who called upon them not only from private
individuals, but from the very magistrates, except the dictators. If
any one ever invoked them when absent, he, too, was released from the
person holding him prisoner and was either brought before the
populace by them or was set free. And if ever they saw fit that
anything should not be done, they prevented it, whether the person
acting were a private citizen or a magistrate; and if the populace or
the senate was about to do or to vote anything and a single tribune
opposed it, the action or the vote became null and void. As time went
on, they were allowed, or allowed themselves, to summon the senate,
to punish anybody who disobeyed them, to practice divination, and to
hold court. And in the case of anything that was unlawful for them to
do, they gained their point by their incontestable opposition to
every project undertaken by others. For they introduced laws to the
effect that whoever should obstruct them by deed or word, be he
private citizen or magistrate, should be 'devoted' and under a curse.
This being 'devoted' meant destruction; for this was the term applied
to everything that was consecrated, like a victim, for slaughter. The
tribunes themselves were termed by the multitude sacrosanct, since
they served as sacred walls, so to speak, for the shelter of such as
invoked them; for sacra among the Romans means 'walls', and
sancta 'sacred'. Many of their actions were unwarrantable, for they
threw even consuls into prison and put men to death without granting
them a hearing. Nobody ventured to oppose them; or, in case anyone
did, he himself became 'devoted'. If, however, persons were not
condemned by all the tribunes, they would call to their help those
who had not concurred in the verdict, and so were given a regular
trial before the tribunes themselves or before a jury or before the
populace, and were subject to the deciding vote. In the course of
time the number of the tribunes was fixed at ten, and as a result of
this most of their power was overthrown.

Through the tendency, natural to most persons, to differ with their
fellow officials — since it is always difficult for a number of men
to attain harmony, especially in a position of any influence — all
their power was being dissipated and torn to shreds; for none of
their resolutions was valid in case even one of them opposed it. They
had originally received their office for no other purpose than to
resist such as were oppressing anybody, and thus he who tried to
prevent any measure from being carried into effect was sure to prove
stronger than those who supported it.

Now at first they did not enter the senate-house, but sat at the
entrance and watched proceedings, and in case anything failed to
please them, they would then and there oppose it. Next they were
invited inside. Later, however, the ex-tribunes became members of the
senate, and finally some of the senators even sought to be tribunes —
unless one chanced to be a patrician. Patricians the people would not
accept; for after choosing the tribunes to defend them against the
patricians, and advancing them to so great power, they feared that a
patrician might turn this power to contrary purposes and use it
against them. But if a man abjured the rank given him by birth and
changed his status to that of a common citizen, they received him
gladly. And a number of the most prominent patricians actually did
renounce their nobility, through desire for the immense influence
possible, and so became tribunes." - Cassius Dio, "Roman History"
IV.14-15


"The caesar who was owed to his ancestors, god manifest, has gone to
join them, and the Emperor whom the world expected and hoped for has
been proclaimed, the good genius of the world and source of all
blessings, Nero Caesar, has been proclaimed. Therefore ought we all
wearing garlands and with sacrifices of oxen to give thanks to all
the gods. The 1st year of Nero Claudius Caesar Augustus Germanicus,
the 21st of the month of Neus Sebastus." - proclamation issued in
Aegyptus on this day in AD 54

Valete bene!

Cato
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81930 From: Cato Date: 2010-11-17
Subject: Re: ORDO EQUESTER - The Solution Needed
Cato Petronio Dextero Iulio Sabino omnibusque in foro SPD

I understand the tendency to see that anything based on finances might be exclusionary or (in a very mild way) discriminatory; this does not need to be the case, however. There are countless examples of memberships in all kinds of organizations that reward higher-paying members in one way or another, although it may be a peculiarly American expression of pride to do so :)

The membership in the Ordo Equester based on an extra amount (the "private horse") being paid in taxes would be totally voluntary.

If I may, Sabine, I think the idea of awarding membership in the Ordo Equester based on century points is valid - and I *think* that might be the part where you as censor, and those who follow you in that office, can award the "public horse" to citizens.

So in my opinion, I'm looking at this as a way to both return the Ordo to its ancient roots *and* build up a little cash for the Aerarium. It's not a do-or-die for me, but I like it a lot.

Valete bene,

Cato



--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, iulius sabinus <iulius_sabinus@...> wrote:
>
> SALVE DEXTER ET SALVETE!
>  
> Some of us - but I let them to present themselves if want - advocate for an Order Equester based of the century points resulted from the voluntary work for NR. It's more equitable in modern times and more in line with the needs of a voluntary organization.
> Money can be raised from taxes and other.
> I will not vehement sustain my point against other proposals; I only let the door open to other possibilities to be investigated. Voluntary work as an expression of the necessary wealth to belong to Ordo Equester is one of these possibilities.
>  
> VALE ET VALETE,
> Sabinus
>
> "Every individual is the architect of his own fortune" - Appius Claudius
>
> --- On Wed, 11/17/10, petronius_dexter <jfarnoud94@...> wrote:
>
>
> From: petronius_dexter <jfarnoud94@...>
> Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: ORDO EQUESTER - The Solution Needed
> To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> Date: Wednesday, November 17, 2010, 6:26 AM
>
>
>  
>
>
>
> C. Petronius omnibus forensibus s.p.d.,
>
> I wonder if to create an ordo equester may be a good idea. Yes in antiqua Roma there was this order but we know that this minority of citizens wanted have all things of the res publica and finally made the mess making poorer all citizens farmers and colons, self living on the products of their own, untill to create civilian wars and imperial power.
>
> Dividing people in 2 ordines, 1 the great majority without powers and anything and 2 a minority with all powers and honores is not a good thing to recreate, in my opinion. Dividing people on money, is historical, indeed, but is it necessary and efficient? I am not sure about.
>
> Valete quam optime.
>
> C. Petronius Dexter
> Arcoiali scribebat
> a. d. XV Kalendas Decembres P. Memmio K. Fabio II coss.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81931 From: Cato Date: 2010-11-17
Subject: Re: Senate Item IX, creation of a new forum
Cato Mariae Caecae sal.

To be honest, I'm one of those who voted against the idea, because I see it as unnecessary.

We already have a Forum (we're standing in it now), and those with slightly more tender sensibilities can dip their feet in the New Roman List first to get a feel for the water.

So honestly, I have no idea what this new List is supposed to accomplish, really. I guess I just won't join it, just as I have not joined the so-called "Senaculum" thing that senators are shuffled off into when the House is not in session.

Vale,

Cato
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81932 From: Cato Date: 2010-11-17
Subject: Re: ORDO EQUESTER - The Solution Needed
Cato Tulliae Scholasticae sal.

I think you've jumped to a set of conclusions that are not anything near what (at least) I had in mind, Tullia Scholastica.

There's no means-testing, no divulging of secret personal financial information, none of this Big Brother-like thing you seem to be terrified of. Deriding someone who can afford an extra amount as acting as if it's "pocket change for billionaires" is unnecessarily rude; I'm not a billionaire (or even a thousandaire, unless we use something like yen or pesos), yet I'd do it in a heartbeat.

The idea is if someone wants - voluntarily - to pay a certain amount above their regular taxes, they can; in return, they are awarded a place in the Ordo Equester.

And, for the record, there is nothing wrong with anyone showing off a little to gain public recognition - again, voluntarily - if they want to; it can be a matter of pride. Maybe you consider it vulgar, but it's a perfectly - almost definitively - Roman thing to do.

Vale,

Cato

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "A. Tullia Scholastica" <fororom@...> wrote:
>
> >
> > A. Tullia Scholastica T. Julio Sabino quiritibus bonae voluntatis S.P.D.
> >
> >
> >
> > SALVE DEXTER ET SALVETE!
> >  
> > Some of us - but I let them to present themselves if want - advocate for an
> > Order Equester based of the century points resulted from the voluntary work
> > for NR. It's more equitable in modern times and more in line with the needs of
> > a voluntary organization.
> >
> > ATS: I agree. This is the coin of the realm here. We should not impose
> > anything like a means test on anyone above and beyond the basic tax assessed
> > at a percentage of GDP or whatever; merchants should, however, contribute
> > something to NR for the privilege of doing business with our citizens. The
> > question is what amount or percentage would be just, not merely an enhancement
> > to the treasury. We are not here to make money, though the merchants must,
> > and should be able to contribute something. I also see no reason why the Ordo
> > should be restricted to merchants; those of us who contribute much of our time
> > here might well deserve inclusion among the equestrians.
> >
> >
> > Money can be raised from taxes and other.
> >
> > ATS: Yes, if they are assessed at a just level, not ones which constitute
> > pocket change for billionaires.
> >
> > I will not vehement sustain my point against other proposals; I only let the
> > door open to other possibilities to be investigated. Voluntary work as an
> > expression of the necessary wealth to belong to Ordo Equester is one of these
> > possibilities.
> >
> > ATS: The Ordo Equester clearly needs revision as well as oversight, but
> > we should not deter people from trading with our citizens by imposing
> > confiscatory fees and / or requirements involving violations of privacy, such
> > as having to provide tax returns. Some good sense, and some compassion, are
> > in order. Broadening the membership to include non-merchants seems to be a
> > good idea, and apparently is in keeping with ancient practice.
> >
> >  
> > VALE ET VALETE,
> > Sabinus
> >
> >
> > Vale et valete.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > "Every individual is the architect of his own fortune" - Appius Claudius
> >
> > --- On Wed, 11/17/10, petronius_dexter <jfarnoud94@...
> > <mailto:jfarnoud94%40yahoo.fr> > wrote:
> >
> > From: petronius_dexter <jfarnoud94@... <mailto:jfarnoud94%40yahoo.fr> >
> > Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: ORDO EQUESTER - The Solution Needed
> > To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com <mailto:Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com>
> > Date: Wednesday, November 17, 2010, 6:26 AM
> >
> >  
> >
> > C. Petronius omnibus forensibus s.p.d.,
> >
> > I wonder if to create an ordo equester may be a good idea. Yes in antiqua Roma
> > there was this order but we know that this minority of citizens wanted have
> > all things of the res publica and finally made the mess making poorer all
> > citizens farmers and colons, self living on the products of their own, untill
> > to create civilian wars and imperial power.
> >
> > Dividing people in 2 ordines, 1 the great majority without powers and anything
> > and 2 a minority with all powers and honores is not a good thing to recreate,
> > in my opinion. Dividing people on money, is historical, indeed, but is it
> > necessary and efficient? I am not sure about.
> >
> > Valete quam optime.
> >
> > C. Petronius Dexter
> > Arcoiali scribebat
> > a. d. XV Kalendas Decembres P. Memmio K. Fabio II coss.
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81933 From: David Kling Date: 2010-11-17
Subject: Re: Senate Item IX, creation of a new forum
Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus Catoni salutem dicit

There are too many lists and too much controversy when people get
disgruntled and want to delete lists or kick people off of them.

I was thinking and it dawned on me that simplicity might be the better
option. One senate list (I don't like the senaculum list either), one list
for both the Collegium Augurum and the Collegium Pontificum and Sacerdotes
list and have business conducted openly with sacerdotes there to offer
advice and learn. Keeping things simple seems better.

Vale;

Modianus

On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 6:16 AM, Cato <catoinnyc@...> wrote:

>
>
> Cato Mariae Caecae sal.
>
> To be honest, I'm one of those who voted against the idea, because I see it
> as unnecessary.
>
> We already have a Forum (we're standing in it now), and those with slightly
> more tender sensibilities can dip their feet in the New Roman List first to
> get a feel for the water.
>
> So honestly, I have no idea what this new List is supposed to accomplish,
> really. I guess I just won't join it, just as I have not joined the
> so-called "Senaculum" thing that senators are shuffled off into when the
> House is not in session.
>
> Vale,
>
> Cato
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81934 From: Cato Date: 2010-11-17
Subject: Re: Senate Item IX, creation of a new forum
Cato Modiano sal.

I could not agree with you more.

LOL that's a change :)

Vale bene,

Cato

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, David Kling <tau.athanasios@...> wrote:
>
> Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus Catoni salutem dicit
>
> There are too many lists and too much controversy when people get
> disgruntled and want to delete lists or kick people off of them.
>
> I was thinking and it dawned on me that simplicity might be the better
> option. One senate list (I don't like the senaculum list either), one list
> for both the Collegium Augurum and the Collegium Pontificum and Sacerdotes
> list and have business conducted openly with sacerdotes there to offer
> advice and learn. Keeping things simple seems better.
>
> Vale;
>
> Modianus
>
> On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 6:16 AM, Cato <catoinnyc@...> wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > Cato Mariae Caecae sal.
> >
> > To be honest, I'm one of those who voted against the idea, because I see it
> > as unnecessary.
> >
> > We already have a Forum (we're standing in it now), and those with slightly
> > more tender sensibilities can dip their feet in the New Roman List first to
> > get a feel for the water.
> >
> > So honestly, I have no idea what this new List is supposed to accomplish,
> > really. I guess I just won't join it, just as I have not joined the
> > so-called "Senaculum" thing that senators are shuffled off into when the
> > House is not in session.
> >
> > Vale,
> >
> > Cato
> >
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81935 From: Aqvillivs Date: 2010-11-17
Subject: Resignation from Cohors Aedilicia
Salvete Omnes,

I know that the current situation within Nova Roma demands every
hand possible in order to get our small organization out of illegality and
back on track again so that it can start to grow and prosper again.
I have the feeling that over institutionalizing some branches of Nova Roma does demand a level of beaurocracy which seems to be rather fitting
a huge corporate structure.
Unfortunately my perception is different.

As time is an extremely important factor in my current life, I have to resign my membership of the Cohors Aedilicia.

Respectfully

C.AQV.ROTA
TRIB.PLEB.
LEG.PR.PR.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81936 From: Cn. Cornelius Lentulus Date: 2010-11-17
Subject: R: [Nova-Roma] Re: ORDO EQUESTER - The Solution Needed
Cn. Lentulus C. Catoni consuli candidato omnibusque s. p. d.




>>> I find this idea fascinating. <<<


Thank you very much, Gai Cato!




>>> First, let me point out that our Articles of Incorporation would *not*
need to be amended, as there are only two classes of citizens listed:
tax-paying (assidui) and non-tax-paying (capite censi); the amount of
tax or how it is paid is not specified, nor are any other
specifications or delineations, those being left to our own law. <<<


I agree with your view, but I don't expose myself as if I were an expert in US corporate law. I will trust in the opinion of my American fellow Nova Romans. In my view, this correction of the Equestrian Order would require only a simple lex, and I imagine its implementation in two steps.

The first step could be done very quickly. Let's open the Equestrian Order to anyone who has a certain amount of century points and is willing to pay an addition to his normal tax rate, let's say, its the 200% or 300% of his normal taxes. It can be done easily even tomorrow.

The second step would be the refinement of this system, working out the two categories of Knights, the equites equo publico (the honorary brunch of the equites) and the equites equo privato. We will work out the fine method of how to combine this with the classes and centuries system, taking care that the centuries and tribes be reduced in number, and be more in line with ancient way of composition. This could take place next year.




>>> So the idea that senators - or anyone willing to pay a higher tax rate
- could be listed in the Ordo Equester is both historically accurate
and a good idea for generating revenue. <<<


To me the more important part is that it is historically accurate: and entirely harmless.




>>> The concept of the "knights of the public horse", an honor given by the
censors, is another exceptionally good idea grounded in historic
practice. <<<


I would not call it an idea, senator C. Cato, it's something obligatory to done, and we are in a serious delay to do this. Nor it is an idea, but a fact, a historic fact of how a Roman society looks like. I feel increasingly uncomfortable that notable citizens, contributing tremendously to the Commonwealth, aren't rewarded, and can not call themselves Knights of Nova Roma, though what they do and what they are, is exactly what an eques Romanus would be: to be the yeast of the Roman identity, the core of the society, the adornment of the republic.




>>>> I applaud Cornelius Lentulus and intend to give my full support to this idea. <<<<


Gai Equiti, consul candidate, I appreciate your support very much, and rest assured that if you promise that you will realize this proposal as a priority in your consular year, you will have my and my clientes' full support in the consular elections.





--- Mar 16/11/10, Cato <catoinnyc@...> ha scritto:

Da: Cato <catoinnyc@...>
Oggetto: [Nova-Roma] Re: ORDO EQUESTER - The Solution Needed
A: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Data: Martedì 16 novembre 2010, 21:53







 









Cato Cornelio Lentulo omnibusque in foro SPD



I find this idea fascinating.



First, let me point out that our Articles of Incorporation would *not* need to be amended, as there are only two classes of citizens listed: tax-paying (assidui) and non-tax-paying (capite censi); the amount of tax or how it is paid is not specified, nor are any other specifications or delineations, those being left to our own law.



So the idea that senators - or anyone willing to pay a higher tax rate - could be listed in the Ordo Equester is both historically accurate and a good idea for generating revenue.



The concept of the "knights of the public horse", an honor given by the censors, is another exceptionally good idea grounded in historic practice.



I applaud Cornelius Lentulus and intend to give my full support to this idea.



Valete,



Cato

























[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81937 From: Publius Memmius Albucius Date: 2010-11-17
Subject: *IMPORTANT* - to all here who are not Nova Roma members
Salvete all !

Nova Roma Board has decided last Nov. 11 to split the current Forum romanum (aka "Main List") and to host every member of the current list, who would not be a member of Nova Roma, in a special forum called "Forum Hospitium" (Guests' forum).

This Forum Hospitium will welcome all people interested in romanitas, exchange of informations on Rome and roman things etc.. The new thing is that it will not allow the recurrent and improductive (at least for our guests ! ;-) ) internal quarrels on Nova Roma, its policy and organization. Such matters will have no place there.

This new Forum Hospitium is for Nova Roma's guests, but not only. I strongly encourage every Nova Roman who wants to find a place to speak quietly of archeaology, Roman cooking, history, culture, etc. with everyone, to subscribe in this Forum Hospitium.

This new place will be managed by members of Nova Roma's praetura, but according ordinary rules. For example, it will be placed directly under the ordinary rules of every list of discussion of this kind : here, as our provider remains Yahoo!, under Yahoo!'s Terms Of Service (abbr. TOS). This will mean a souple environment, but also less patience towards members of this forum who will not respect the other contributors : in this Forum Hospitium, the quality of Nova Roma member ("citizen") will offer no protection, and the Novaroman who will have exceeded the limits may be, according naturally, the pronounced words and the circumstances, just and simply banned of this list, at least for a given time.

Our Forum Hospitium will be open from next Monday November 22, at noon Rome time. Put its address in your favorites asap !

It is possible that, from tomorrow on and until Monday, you may, if you are not NR citizens, live some problems of access in the present forum. We will accept, in the Forum Hospitium, every new member from next Saturday on.

In case of problem, write us at : praetores@yahoogroups.com.

I wish you all good times in Nova Roma new Forum Hospitium. It will be at your image, and the result of the ideas, wealths, knowledge, that you will be inside its electronic "walls".

Have a good time there, and valete sincerely all !



P. Memmius Albucius
consul, NR Inc. co-pdt










[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81938 From: Cn. Cornelius Lentulus Date: 2010-11-17
Subject: R: [Nova-Roma] Re: ORDO EQUESTER - The Solution Needed
Lentulus Iuliae Aquilae aedili s. d.


>>> I caution against assigning arbitrary numbers to dues, or to Eques
taxes/donation, for example. There are very few Novi Romani who are
wealthy enough to afford such high dues, research is required. As we
have done with our tax system. <<<<


I agree with you. This is why I think the Equestrian Tax should not be more than 2 or 3 times the basic tax. If you pay now 10 USD, you would pay 20 USD (or 30 USD) if you want to be a knight.

I also think there should be a minimal tax rate and a maximal tax rate in Nova Roma. Currently, our tax rate in Liechtenstein is 50.00 USD, while in Ecuador it is 1.00 USD. We know that people in Liechtenstein are far, far richer than people in Ecuador, but there ARE poor people even in Liechtenstein, and that tax rate is very discriminative towards them. And even rich people may find it unrealistic to pay 50 USD for an annual tax in NR, while other have only to pay 1 USD. For example, if we have a very rich citizen from Ecuador, he can pay for all of his fellow citizens' taxes in Ecuador, making them his clientes. From 50 USD, he can create 50 assidui, and he will rule over Nova Roma. So, even if we are very social, good willing and fair minded, we can not allow too low tax rates, not even in the poorest countries. A minimum of 5 USD, or something like this, should be set up as the lowest possible tax rate. Similary, with the highest possible tax rate,
we should not impose 50 USD on Liechtenstein. If a citizen from Liechtenstein would want to be equestrian, and let suppose, we require 200% from equestrians to pay, he should pay 100 USD, whil an Ecuadorian equestrian should pay 2 USD to be in the highest order of top citizens. That is exaggerated fairness, that is not just. The maximum highness of tax rate should be about 30 USD (thus 60 USD for Equestrians, if we ask 200% from them).


>>>> Right now I do not support a lifetime membership - it breeds stagnation and indifference. Look at the Senate - how many of them come down and walk in the forum? Even if their names are being mentioned? They may show up to vote and in my opinion no longer have their fingers on the
pulse of the Respublica. <<<


I agree with that, too. Taxes are taxes. They have to be paid yearly. That's a yearly sacrifice, the only one, we require from the most dedicated Nova Romans. If nothing else, that yearly action shall keep people linked to their community.


>>> They do not fully represent the citizens. <<<<


You say this about the senatores. Let me correct this slightly: the senatores do not represent citizens: they should not. They are not representatives, they are an advisory body to the consules. The representative of the people are the various comitia, where we represent ourselves.


Cura, ut valeas optime!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81939 From: Cn. Cornelius Lentulus Date: 2010-11-17
Subject: R: [Nova-Roma] Re: ORDO EQUESTER - The Solution Needed
Lentulus C. Dextro suo sal.


I understand your concern, I remember of your bad opinion of the Roman knights both from our private discussions and from your input to this very same topic last year.

I have more positive picture of the Roman ordo equester, even if it was their social stratum that caused the republic to die, and got the emperors to rule. The equestrian order produced such excellent Romans like M. Cicero and T. Pomponius Atticus. Before the Gracchi separated the senators from the equestrians, all senators and Roman heros were part of the ordo equester. When I think of the equites, I think of the more virtuous equestrian order which existed from the time of the kings to the Gracchi.

 
>>> Yes in
antiqua Roma there was this order but we know that this minority of
citizens wanted have all things of the res publica and finally made the
mess making poorer all citizens farmers and colons, self living on the
products of their own, untill to create civilian wars and imperial
power. <<<<


We will not and want not to give such a power in the hands of our equites. They will not have monetary power over us: on the contrary, we will take away their money by asking a higher tax from them. One could call this a socialist idea :)

Our equites would be those who work more, work more for Nova Roma: the requirement would be the high century point (which is a given in NR for your community services). So, not at all an oligarchic tyranny of the evil riches ones! If somebody wanted to be an eques, he should have to 1) work harder (to reach the necessary century points) and 2) to pay more. It is like a socialist utopy where those who work the hardest are rewarded the most.
;o)




>>> Dividing people in 2 ordines, 1 the great majority without powers and
anything and 2 a minority with all powers and honores is not a good
thing to recreate, in my opinion. Dividing people on money, is
historical, indeed, but is it necessary and efficient? <<<


As I say, it would not be a division based on money, but a division based on work for Nova Roma, and GIVING to NR. Even the poorest person can give twice as much as he gives to NR currently, so the ordo equester would be open to the poorest one, too. The equestrian status would not depend on how rich you are: it would be obtainable only if you work and get century points enough, AND if you are willing to sacrifice a bit more money. There are a lot of very rich people in NR who don't pay not even the basic taxes. Because they are not so dedicated. And I always pay my taxes, although I am currently as poor as I could not even eat a dinner today. But I paid my taxes because I'm dedicated to NR. So, you can see, payment of 10 or 20 dollars is not a question of richness but a question of dedication.

Our NR ordo equester would consist not of people who are the richest, but of people who are the most dedicated and work the most.

In my opinion, however, in a later improvement, we should add another way how one can enter to the ordo equester: through knowlede. I think we could and should improve the quality of NR if we advanced Latinists, scholars, academics and PhDs a bit, just a little bit more. An idea could be to grant them with some extra century points, or to lift the required payment of higher taxes, so that they can enter the equestrian order more easily.


Cura, ut valeas optime!

















[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81940 From: gualterus_graecus Date: 2010-11-17
Subject: R: [Nova-Roma] Re: ORDO EQUESTER - The Solution Needed
Salve,

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Cn. Cornelius Lentulus" <cn_corn_lent@...> wrote:
>
...It is like a socialist utopy where those who work the hardest are rewarded the most.
> ;o)
>

Wait wait, that's the capitalist idea! The socialist one is that those who work the hardest get taxed the most. ;)

Vale,


Gualterus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81941 From: Matt Hucke Date: 2010-11-17
Subject: Re: R: [Nova-Roma] Re: ORDO EQUESTER - The Solution Needed
> Wait wait, that's the capitalist idea! The socialist one is that those who work the hardest get taxed the most. ;)
>

no, no, the capitalist utopia is one where those whose grandfathers
worked the hardest are rewarded the most.

O.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81942 From: Robert Date: 2010-11-17
Subject: Re: R: [Nova-Roma] Re: ORDO EQUESTER - The Solution Needed
Ave

Can't we have both? Lol

Sulla

Sent from my iPhone

On Nov 17, 2010, at 3:13 PM, Matt Hucke <hucke@...> wrote:

>
> > Wait wait, that's the capitalist idea! The socialist one is that those who work the hardest get taxed the most. ;)
> >
>
> no, no, the capitalist utopia is one where those whose grandfathers
> worked the hardest are rewarded the most.
>
> O.
>
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81943 From: gualterus_graecus Date: 2010-11-17
Subject: R: [Nova-Roma] Re: ORDO EQUESTER - The Solution Needed
Salve,

Hehe, well, those guys too--that's still the grandfather's work paying off. It's a pretty good payoff to still reap profit long after you're dead!

Vale,

Gualterus

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Matt Hucke <hucke@...> wrote:
>
>
> > Wait wait, that's the capitalist idea! The socialist one is that those who work the hardest get taxed the most. ;)
> >
>
> no, no, the capitalist utopia is one where those whose grandfathers
> worked the hardest are rewarded the most.
>
> O.
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81944 From: lathyrus77 Date: 2010-11-17
Subject: Re: *IMPORTANT* - to all here who are not Nova Roma members
Salve,

Does this mean guests won't be on the main list anymore?

Vale,

Anna Bucci

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Publius Memmius Albucius <albucius_aoe@...> wrote:
>
>
> Salvete all !
>
> Nova Roma Board has decided last Nov. 11 to split the current Forum romanum (aka "Main List") and to host every member of the current list, who would not be a member of Nova Roma, in a special forum called "Forum Hospitium" (Guests' forum).
>
> This Forum Hospitium will welcome all people interested in romanitas, exchange of informations on Rome and roman things etc.. The new thing is that it will not allow the recurrent and improductive (at least for our guests ! ;-) ) internal quarrels on Nova Roma, its policy and organization. Such matters will have no place there.
>
> This new Forum Hospitium is for Nova Roma's guests, but not only. I strongly encourage every Nova Roman who wants to find a place to speak quietly of archeaology, Roman cooking, history, culture, etc. with everyone, to subscribe in this Forum Hospitium.
>
> This new place will be managed by members of Nova Roma's praetura, but according ordinary rules. For example, it will be placed directly under the ordinary rules of every list of discussion of this kind : here, as our provider remains Yahoo!, under Yahoo!'s Terms Of Service (abbr. TOS). This will mean a souple environment, but also less patience towards members of this forum who will not respect the other contributors : in this Forum Hospitium, the quality of Nova Roma member ("citizen") will offer no protection, and the Novaroman who will have exceeded the limits may be, according naturally, the pronounced words and the circumstances, just and simply banned of this list, at least for a given time.
>
> Our Forum Hospitium will be open from next Monday November 22, at noon Rome time. Put its address in your favorites asap !
>
> It is possible that, from tomorrow on and until Monday, you may, if you are not NR citizens, live some problems of access in the present forum. We will accept, in the Forum Hospitium, every new member from next Saturday on.
>
> In case of problem, write us at : praetores@yahoogroups.com
>
> I wish you all good times in Nova Roma new Forum Hospitium. It will be at your image, and the result of the ideas, wealths, knowledge, that you will be inside its electronic "walls".
>
> Have a good time there, and valete sincerely all !
>
>
>
> P. Memmius Albucius
> consul, NR Inc. co-pdt
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81945 From: L. Livia Plauta Date: 2010-11-17
Subject: Re: *IMPORTANT* - to all here who are not Nova Roma members
Salve Anna,
yes. Apparently guests will be redirected to the ghetto.

Optime vale,
Livia

----- Original Message -----
From: "lathyrus77" <lathyrus77@...>
To: <Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Thursday, November 18, 2010 1:36 AM
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: *IMPORTANT* - to all here who are not Nova Roma
members


Salve,

Does this mean guests won't be on the main list anymore?

Vale,

Anna Bucci

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Publius Memmius Albucius
<albucius_aoe@...> wrote:
>
>
> Salvete all !
>
> Nova Roma Board has decided last Nov. 11 to split the current Forum
> romanum (aka "Main List") and to host every member of the current list,
> who would not be a member of Nova Roma, in a special forum called "Forum
> Hospitium" (Guests' forum).
>
> This Forum Hospitium will welcome all people interested in romanitas,
> exchange of informations on Rome and roman things etc.. The new thing is
> that it will not allow the recurrent and improductive (at least for our
> guests ! ;-) ) internal quarrels on Nova Roma, its policy and
> organization. Such matters will have no place there.
>
> This new Forum Hospitium is for Nova Roma's guests, but not only. I
> strongly encourage every Nova Roman who wants to find a place to speak
> quietly of archeaology, Roman cooking, history, culture, etc. with
> everyone, to subscribe in this Forum Hospitium.
>
> This new place will be managed by members of Nova Roma's praetura, but
> according ordinary rules. For example, it will be placed directly under
> the ordinary rules of every list of discussion of this kind : here, as our
> provider remains Yahoo!, under Yahoo!'s Terms Of Service (abbr. TOS). This
> will mean a souple environment, but also less patience towards members of
> this forum who will not respect the other contributors : in this Forum
> Hospitium, the quality of Nova Roma member ("citizen") will offer no
> protection, and the Novaroman who will have exceeded the limits may be,
> according naturally, the pronounced words and the circumstances, just and
> simply banned of this list, at least for a given time.
>
> Our Forum Hospitium will be open from next Monday November 22, at noon
> Rome time. Put its address in your favorites asap !
>
> It is possible that, from tomorrow on and until Monday, you may, if you
> are not NR citizens, live some problems of access in the present forum. We
> will accept, in the Forum Hospitium, every new member from next Saturday
> on.
>
> In case of problem, write us at : praetores@yahoogroups.com
>
> I wish you all good times in Nova Roma new Forum Hospitium. It will be at
> your image, and the result of the ideas, wealths, knowledge, that you will
> be inside its electronic "walls".
>
> Have a good time there, and valete sincerely all !
>
>
>
> P. Memmius Albucius
> consul, NR Inc. co-pdt
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81946 From: lathyrus77 Date: 2010-11-17
Subject: Re: *IMPORTANT* - to all here who are not Nova Roma members
Salve,

Ah. I guess prospective Nova Romans won't find out about all the dramady till after they join.

I'm ok with being banned from the Main List. Since I won't be here for much longer, I'd like to invite everyone to my roman recon website.

http://ciarin.com/roman/index.php

Vale,

Anna Bucci



--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "L. Livia Plauta" <livia.plauta@...> wrote:
>
> Salve Anna,
> yes. Apparently guests will be redirected to the ghetto.
>
> Optime vale,
> Livia
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "lathyrus77" <lathyrus77@>
> To: <Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com>
> Sent: Thursday, November 18, 2010 1:36 AM
> Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: *IMPORTANT* - to all here who are not Nova Roma
> members
>
>
> Salve,
>
> Does this mean guests won't be on the main list anymore?
>
> Vale,
>
> Anna Bucci
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Publius Memmius Albucius
> <albucius_aoe@> wrote:
> >
> >
> > Salvete all !
> >
> > Nova Roma Board has decided last Nov. 11 to split the current Forum
> > romanum (aka "Main List") and to host every member of the current list,
> > who would not be a member of Nova Roma, in a special forum called "Forum
> > Hospitium" (Guests' forum).
> >
> > This Forum Hospitium will welcome all people interested in romanitas,
> > exchange of informations on Rome and roman things etc.. The new thing is
> > that it will not allow the recurrent and improductive (at least for our
> > guests ! ;-) ) internal quarrels on Nova Roma, its policy and
> > organization. Such matters will have no place there.
> >
> > This new Forum Hospitium is for Nova Roma's guests, but not only. I
> > strongly encourage every Nova Roman who wants to find a place to speak
> > quietly of archeaology, Roman cooking, history, culture, etc. with
> > everyone, to subscribe in this Forum Hospitium.
> >
> > This new place will be managed by members of Nova Roma's praetura, but
> > according ordinary rules. For example, it will be placed directly under
> > the ordinary rules of every list of discussion of this kind : here, as our
> > provider remains Yahoo!, under Yahoo!'s Terms Of Service (abbr. TOS). This
> > will mean a souple environment, but also less patience towards members of
> > this forum who will not respect the other contributors : in this Forum
> > Hospitium, the quality of Nova Roma member ("citizen") will offer no
> > protection, and the Novaroman who will have exceeded the limits may be,
> > according naturally, the pronounced words and the circumstances, just and
> > simply banned of this list, at least for a given time.
> >
> > Our Forum Hospitium will be open from next Monday November 22, at noon
> > Rome time. Put its address in your favorites asap !
> >
> > It is possible that, from tomorrow on and until Monday, you may, if you
> > are not NR citizens, live some problems of access in the present forum. We
> > will accept, in the Forum Hospitium, every new member from next Saturday
> > on.
> >
> > In case of problem, write us at : praetores@yahoogroups.com
> >
> > I wish you all good times in Nova Roma new Forum Hospitium. It will be at
> > your image, and the result of the ideas, wealths, knowledge, that you will
> > be inside its electronic "walls".
> >
> > Have a good time there, and valete sincerely all !
> >
> >
> >
> > P. Memmius Albucius
> > consul, NR Inc. co-pdt
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81947 From: petronius_dexter Date: 2010-11-17
Subject: R: [Nova-Roma] Re: ORDO EQUESTER - The Solution Needed
C. Petronius Cn. Lentulo suo s.p.d.,

> I understand your concern, I remember of your bad opinion of the Roman knights both from our private discussions and from your input to this very same topic last year.

Yes, I do not like the divisions between citizens, I know the human nature and I read history to know that I am right. Clio is a teacher whose the lessons are quickly forgotten. I think that history must teach us and we have to prevent to make always the same errors. Many examples are in all civilizations which imposed division between a minority getting all in its hands and a majority with nothing except the right to be in shadow.

> I have more positive picture of the Roman ordo equester, even if it was their social stratum that caused the republic to die, and got the emperors to rule.

Yes and it was not based on the values of the Roman virtues but always on basic bad and vulgar interests. This ordo equester wanted to be the predator of the Roman Empire, it wanted to have more and more and it obtained the victory on all other citizens even on the aristocrats. I am sure that the coup of Catiline was the last tentative by the aristocrats to remain on the top, but finally the power of the money was the stronger. By the way, I do not like too the aristocratical division based on the blood and the birth. In fact, I do not like any division, any elite.

Does need Nova Roma a merchant order? Does need Nova Roma an equester ordo? Not at all. We know by story the danger of this ordo based on economical interests and privileges, we have to trust in Clio. If you need an elite, so propose the establishment of an elite of men and women virtuous not one of a richer minority over the majority of the less richs. It is vulgar, known in all our macronations and an insult towards Clio.

> The equestrian order produced such excellent Romans like M. Cicero and T. Pomponius Atticus. Before the Gracchi separated the senators from the equestrians, all senators and Roman heros were part of the ordo equester.

To be within this order you did not need one virtue except 400 000 HS as heritage or patrimony and the agreement of the Censors to be unscribed as eques.

> When I think of the equites, I think of the more virtuous equestrian order which existed from the time of the kings to the Gracchi.

You forget the human nature. You have one image of this order, ok. As a glossy photograph. But in fact, you cannot know how a such order will evolve into Nova Roma and if I compare with I know on the human nature and on this year, I am not confident on any elite.

> We will not and want not to give such a power in the hands of our equites. They will not have monetary power over us: on the contrary, we will take away their money by asking a higher tax from them. One could call this a socialist idea :)

You cannot prevent anything against the power of the money. In creating this order, I am sure that you set the fox to mind the geese. Imagine a citizen paying a higher tax than others, one moment he will want to be senator. And why not? He is a richman of Nova Roma an "eques", he pays high taxes, he must have more rights than others... and Clio will lament. We know very well this scenario.

Why do you want an order equester? We yet have patricians and plebeians. It is enough as divisions.

> Our equites would be those who work more, work more for Nova Roma: the requirement would be the high century point (which is a given in NR for your community services). So, not at all an oligarchic tyranny of the evil riches ones! If somebody wanted to be an eques, he should have to 1) work harder (to reach the necessary century points) and 2) to pay more. It is like a socialist utopy where those who work the hardest are rewarded the most.

It is an utopy. We are in the real word, remember the human nature.

> As I say, it would not be a division based on money, but a division based on work for Nova Roma, and GIVING to NR.

I suggest that the citizens who give more for Nova Roma enter on the Patrician order. We have yet a kind of elite, no need to have another.

Optime vale.

C. Petronius Dexter
Arcoiali scribebat
a. d. XIV Kalendas Decembres P. Memmio K. Fabio II coss.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81948 From: quintus_claudius_crispus Date: 2010-11-18
Subject: Re: *IMPORTANT* - to all here who are not Nova Roma members
Salvete

I have been lurking here for some time as I still have a great fondness for the idea of Nova Roma but feel let down by some of the people within it. I had thought that when things settled down and people decided that they wanted to just be Nova Romans that I would ask to be re-admitted. Unfortunately if everything is going to be done behind closed doors I will never have that chance. As a former Assidui and now a guest I feel this is a very retrograde step, intended to hide the disgrace rather than attempt to improve the place.

Valete

R.Draper (formerly Q. Claudius Crispus)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81949 From: David Kling Date: 2010-11-18
Subject: Re: *IMPORTANT* - to all here who are not Nova Roma members
Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus Quinto Claudio Crispo salutem dicit

I would encourage you to return as a citizen.

Nova Roma has undergone some serious conflict, but I am confident that we
are coming upon a new time in Nova Roma where I hope that opposing sides
have learned the value of working together for the common good. Sometimes
conflict can be used to promote growth, and a new found energy can come from
that.

I think improvements are in the works.

Vale;

Modianus

On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 5:30 AM, quintus_claudius_crispus <
derwentbob@...> wrote:

>
>
> Salvete
>
> I have been lurking here for some time as I still have a great fondness for
> the idea of Nova Roma but feel let down by some of the people within it. I
> had thought that when things settled down and people decided that they
> wanted to just be Nova Romans that I would ask to be re-admitted.
> Unfortunately if everything is going to be done behind closed doors I will
> never have that chance. As a former Assidui and now a guest I feel this is a
> very retrograde step, intended to hide the disgrace rather than attempt to
> improve the place.
>
> Valete
>
> R.Draper (formerly Q. Claudius Crispus)
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81950 From: Cato Date: 2010-11-18
Subject: a.d. XIV Kal. Dec.
Cato omnibus in foro SPD

Hodiernus dies est ante diem XIV Kalendas Decembris; haec dies comitialis est.

"Not long after this the Dictator appeared, and at once ordered the
trumpet to sound the Assembly. When silence was restored an usher
summoned Q. Fabius, the Master of the Horse. He advanced and stood
immediately below the Dictator's tribunal. The Dictator began:
"Quintus Fabius, inasmuch as the Dictator possesses supreme authority,
to which the consuls who exercise the old kingly power, and the
praetors who are elected under the same auspices as the consuls alike
submit, I ask you whether or not you think it right and fitting that
the Master of the Horse should bow to that authority? Further, I ask
you whether as I was aware that I had left the City under doubtful
auspices I ought to have jeopardised the safety of the republic in the
face of this religious difficulty, or whether I ought to have taken
the auspices afresh and so avoided any action till the pleasure of the
gods was known? I should also like to know whether, if a religious
impediment prevents the Dictator from acting, the Master of the Horse
is at liberty to consider himself free and unhampered by such
impediment? But why am I putting these questions? Surely, if I had
gone away without leaving any orders, you ought to have used your
judgment in interpreting my wishes and acted accordingly. Answer me
this, rather: Did I forbid you to take any action in my absence? Did I
forbid you to engage the enemy? In contempt of my orders, whilst the
auspices were still indecisive and the sanctions of religion withheld,
you dared to give battle, in defiance of all the military custom and
discipline of our ancestors, in defiance of the will of the gods.
Answer the questions put to you, but beware of uttering a single word
about anything else. Lictor, stand by him!"

Fabius found it far from easy to reply to each question in detail, and
protested against the same man being both accuser and judge in a
matter of life and death. He exclaimed that it would be easier to
deprive him of his life than of the glory he had won, and went on to
exculpate himself and bring charges against the Dictator. Papirius in
a fresh outburst of rage ordered the Master of the Horse to be
stripped and the rods and axes to be got ready. Fabius appealed to the
soldiers for help, and as the lictors began to tear off his clothes,
he retreated behind the triarii who were now raising a tumult. Their
shouts were taken up through the whole concourse, threats and
entreaties were heard everywhere. Those nearest the tribunal, who
could be recognised as being within view of the Dictator implored him
to spare the Master of the Horse and not with him to condemn the whole
army; those furthest off and the men who had closed round Fabius
reviled the Dictator as unfeeling and merciless. Matters were rapidly
approaching a mutiny. Even those on the tribunal did not remain quiet;
the staff officers who were standing round the Dictator's chair begged
him to adjourn the proceedings to the following day to allow his anger
to cool and give time for quiet consideration. They urged that the
youthful spirit of Fabius had been sufficiently chastened and his
victory sufficiently sullied; they begged him not to push his
punishment to extremities or to brand with ignominy not only a youth
of exceptional merit but also his distinguished father and the whole
Fabian house. When they found their arguments and entreaties alike
unavailing, they asked him to look at the angry multitude in front. To
add fire to men whose tempers were already inflamed and to provide the
materials for a mutiny was, they said, unworthy of a man of his age
and experience. If a mutiny did occur, no one would throw the blame of
it upon Q. Fabius, who was only deprecating punishment; the sole
responsibility would lie on the Dictator for having in his blind
passion provoked the multitude to a deplorable struggle with him. And
as a final argument they declared that to prevent him from supposing
that they were actuated by any personal feeling in favour of Fabius,
they were prepared to state on oath that they considered the
infliction of punishment on Fabius under present circumstances to be
detrimental to the interests of the State." - Livy, History of Rome
8.32


"Strong and bright, tall and beautiful of form, who sends down by day
and by night a flow of motherly waters as large as the whole of the
waters that run along the earth, and who runs powerfully." - Fifth
Yasht (Abaun), "Hymn to the Waters", from the Avesta, the sacred
writings of Zoroastrianism

"The first statue of massive gold, without any hollowness within, and
anterior to any of those statues of bronze even, which are known as
'holosphyratae,' is said to have been erected in the Temple of the
goddess Anaitis [Anahita]; to what particular region this name
belongs, we have already stated, it being that of a divinity held in
the highest veneration by the nations in that part of the world." -
Pliny, Natural History XXXIII.xxiv.82

"Most of the precious metals were stripped off in the invasion of
Alexander and his Macedonians, and the rest during the reigns of
Antigonus and Seleucus the son of Nicanor, but still, when Antiochus
reached the place, the temple of Aene [Anahita] alone had the columns
round it still gilded and a number of silver tiles were piled up in
it, while a few gold bricks and a considerable quantity of silver ones
remained." - Polybius, Histories 10.IV.27

"Now the Persians do not erect statues or altars, but offer sacrifice
on a high place, regarding the heavens as Zeus [Ahura-Mazda]; and they
also worship Helios [the Sun], who they call Mithras, and Selene
[Anahita] and Aphrodite, and fire and earth and winds and water; and
with earnest prayer they offer sacrifice in a purified place,
presenting the victim crowned, and when the Magus, who directs the
sacrifice, has divided the meat the people go away with their
shares,Â…; but still, according to some writers, they place a small
portion of the caul upon the fire." - Strabo, Geographies XV.3.13-14

In ancient Persia, today was held in honor of the goddes Ardvi Sura,
an aspect of Anahita. Anahita, which means "the humid", or "strong",
or "immaculate one", was one of the ruling deities of the Persian
Empire. She embodied the physical and metaphroical qualities of water,
especially the fertilizing flow of water from the fountain in the
stars. She also ruled semen and human fertility. She was viewed as the
"Golden Mother" and as a warrior maiden. Anahita was often shown
wearing a golden kerchief, square gold earrings, and a jeweled diadem,
and wrapped in a golde-embroidered cloak adorned with thirty otter
skins. Anahita was sometimes depicted as driving a chariot drawn by
four white horses, representing wind, rain, clouds, and hail. Anahita
was honored with offerings of green branches and white heifers. Ritual
prostitution occurred in Her temples in order to "purify the seed of
males and the womb and milk of females," according to Strabo.

Her cult was strongest in Western Iran, and had extensive parallels
with that of the Semitic Near Eastern "Queen of Heaven", deification
of the planet Venus, eternal virgin (however many sexual encounters
she had), goddess of war, love, and fertility Ishtar, who was probably
derived from the Sumerian Inana. Anahita may have been a direct
borrowing from the Near East, or may have acquired Near Eastern
characteristics from a confrontation between Iranian and Mesopotamian
cultures.

In modern Persian Anahita (Nahid) is the name for the planet Venus.


Valete bene!

Cato
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81951 From: lathyrus77 Date: 2010-11-18
Subject: Re: *IMPORTANT* - to all here who are not Nova Roma members
Salve,

I don't think anything positive will happen in Nova Roma any time soon unless a certain senator is banned from Nova Roma.

Vale,

Anna Bucci

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, David Kling <tau.athanasios@...> wrote:
>
> Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus Quinto Claudio Crispo salutem dicit
>
> I would encourage you to return as a citizen.
>
> Nova Roma has undergone some serious conflict, but I am confident that we
> are coming upon a new time in Nova Roma where I hope that opposing sides
> have learned the value of working together for the common good. Sometimes
> conflict can be used to promote growth, and a new found energy can come from
> that.
>
> I think improvements are in the works.
>
> Vale;
>
> Modianus
>
> On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 5:30 AM, quintus_claudius_crispus <
> derwentbob@...> wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > Salvete
> >
> > I have been lurking here for some time as I still have a great fondness for
> > the idea of Nova Roma but feel let down by some of the people within it. I
> > had thought that when things settled down and people decided that they
> > wanted to just be Nova Romans that I would ask to be re-admitted.
> > Unfortunately if everything is going to be done behind closed doors I will
> > never have that chance. As a former Assidui and now a guest I feel this is a
> > very retrograde step, intended to hide the disgrace rather than attempt to
> > improve the place.
> >
> > Valete
> >
> > R.Draper (formerly Q. Claudius Crispus)
> >
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81952 From: Cato Date: 2010-11-18
Subject: Re: *IMPORTANT* - to all here who are not Nova Roma members
Cato omnibus in foro SPD

It is *exactly* the kind of mindset expressed by this "Anna" that undermine every real effort being made to re-create an atmosphere in which we can all work together.

Perhaps she should peddle her animosity and useless antagonism elsewhere, because it has no place in our Respublica.

Valete,

Cato



--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "lathyrus77" <lathyrus77@...> wrote:
>
> Salve,
>
> I don't think anything positive will happen in Nova Roma any time soon unless a certain senator is banned from Nova Roma.
>
> Vale,
>
> Anna Bucci
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, David Kling <tau.athanasios@> wrote:
> >
> > Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus Quinto Claudio Crispo salutem dicit
> >
> > I would encourage you to return as a citizen.
> >
> > Nova Roma has undergone some serious conflict, but I am confident that we
> > are coming upon a new time in Nova Roma where I hope that opposing sides
> > have learned the value of working together for the common good. Sometimes
> > conflict can be used to promote growth, and a new found energy can come from
> > that.
> >
> > I think improvements are in the works.
> >
> > Vale;
> >
> > Modianus
> >
> > On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 5:30 AM, quintus_claudius_crispus <
> > derwentbob@> wrote:
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > Salvete
> > >
> > > I have been lurking here for some time as I still have a great fondness for
> > > the idea of Nova Roma but feel let down by some of the people within it. I
> > > had thought that when things settled down and people decided that they
> > > wanted to just be Nova Romans that I would ask to be re-admitted.
> > > Unfortunately if everything is going to be done behind closed doors I will
> > > never have that chance. As a former Assidui and now a guest I feel this is a
> > > very retrograde step, intended to hide the disgrace rather than attempt to
> > > improve the place.
> > >
> > > Valete
> > >
> > > R.Draper (formerly Q. Claudius Crispus)
> > >
> >
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81953 From: Cato Date: 2010-11-18
Subject: Re: *IMPORTANT* - to all here who are not Nova Roma members
Cato Claudio Crispo omnibusque in foro SPD

I dislike the idea of this separation intensely. If I am elected consul, I will do everything in my power to have this senatus consultum either repealed by the Senate or overridden by a lex passed in comitia.

This will not make me popular with those who advocated for it, but it is my firm belief that without critical observation from the "outside", we can only too easily become self-congratulatory and stagnant. Anyone should be able to observe and interact with the citizens of the Respublica with minimal interference.

I have said over and over again that this idea that the ancients were immaculate-poised, eternally dignified marble statues is ludicrous and mistaken; we, like they, are humans, with all the vagaries and peculiarities that come with the human condition.

Any person interested in seeing how we "tick" will certainly not be well served by some Potemkin village of a Forum.

Valete,

Cato

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "quintus_claudius_crispus" <derwentbob@...> wrote:
>
> Salvete
>
> I have been lurking here for some time as I still have a great fondness for the idea of Nova Roma but feel let down by some of the people within it. I had thought that when things settled down and people decided that they wanted to just be Nova Romans that I would ask to be re-admitted. Unfortunately if everything is going to be done behind closed doors I will never have that chance. As a former Assidui and now a guest I feel this is a very retrograde step, intended to hide the disgrace rather than attempt to improve the place.
>
> Valete
>
> R.Draper (formerly Q. Claudius Crispus)
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81954 From: Cn. Cornelius Lentulus Date: 2010-11-18
Subject: R: [Nova-Roma] Re: ORDO EQUESTER - The Solution Needed
Cn. Lentulus C. Petronio suo amico s.p.d.


>>>> Yes, I do not like the divisions between citizens, I know the human nature and I read history to know that I am right. Clio is a teacher whose the lessons are quickly forgotten. I think that history must teach us and we have to prevent to make always the same errors. <<<<


Historia est magistra vitae. I understand what you say, but I think if we learn from the past, it does not necessarily mean that we have to avoid everything which contained a mistake in the past. Rather it means to me that we have to reform such things in a way that ensures the same mistake can not happen again. In our current case it means that we have to ensure that the Equestrians can not become an exclusivist money aristocracy, but a signal of hard work and honor, an honor for which all citizens strive.

Division can be a bad thing, but it can be a good thing, too, if wisely applied. For example, there is a division in schools among the students, and there are who finish the university "summa cum laude", and there are who don't receive such title because they were worse students. Is this division bad? No. This division is good, because it makes students work harder to achieve the honorary diploma. This is how the modern equestrian order should function. It should be open to anyone who is dedicated to Nova Roma, and it should function as "yeast", as a prize which encourages people to work for Nova Roma, to serve and to be honored.

I believe in good divisions, where the higher position is available to anyone.

There were a lot of examples in history both about systems which tried to avoid division, and about systems which wanted strong divisions. For example, the Athenian democracy was very egalitarian among male citizens. It still worked bad, and Athens became a tyranny, and the mass followed the demagogues. There were socialist and communist states that instituted strict egalitarianism, and they failed. I think it is the fair application of law, the existence of a constitutional state which allows freedom of flexible transition between different classes and categories, and not the existence or non-existence of divisions, that guarantees a society is good and fair. Both a society with divisions and a society without divisions can be bad, but can be good, too, if the sense of liberty and fairness are revered. It's not the division that hurts, but the culture of freedom or oppression that makes the difference.


>>> Many examples are in all civilizations which imposed division between a minority getting all in its hands and a majority with nothing except the right to be in shadow. <<<<


As you write this, it comes to my mind that even if there is no official division, there IS hidden division. There are always smarter and less able people, there are always richer are poorer people, there are always those with good connections and people without protection and supporters. There are always networks of powerful people who control the society. If there is no "official" division (i.e. a label or signal of their status) added to their name, it just makes their power hidden and seemingly non-existent, while they can operate on controlling the society and we can not know who they are, how many they are, etc.
Our potentates in the modern days determine the decisions of politicians, influence them, and rule the society with their huge capital, with their firms and companies, with their network of "clients". And they remain unrecognizable, they are not called equites or counts. They are called millionaires. Now, what society is the more fair? The one where everyone has to be called on name, and we know who is on the top of the society, or the one where they can hide in the obscure unknownness, and they can manipulate the government from the background?

This train of thought just demonstrates to me that we can not create a fully egalitarian society, but we can create a fair society where the rules are clear, where there is flexibility between the classes, and where potentates are called to account.

My proposal on the ordo equester is conceived in this spirit.

And there is a positive side of a flexible, inclusivistic division. If the division creates open classes into which entrance is possible to all under fair and just requirements, it makes the society more productive, more creative and purposeful. Like in the school where good grades are given to students who work harder, or like in a workplace where better workers are awarded with promotion and higher rank. In a society or in any group of people where such a positive division exists, where work, dedication and excellence are awarded, people tend to work better and have more desire to be excellent so that they can achieve the higher rank.
I think this is a positive side of division, BUT this only works if the division is fair, just and flexible. It only works if the higher rank is really fairly open to anyone, and the requirements are possible to be filled by anyone who is determined and who is ready to do for it. And it only works well, if those who are awarded with the higher rank are not granted with exaggerated privileges.

My proposal considers all these factors, and ingression to the equestrian order of Nova Roma would be very fair and very easy. It would require work primarily, the century points, NOT money (seriously, how could not sacrifice 10-20 USD during a year?).
And, I am even ready to renounce about the idea of higher payment if the citizens find it unfair: the most important part of the requirements is the amount of century points. If the people think the taxes should not be involved at all, that's fine with me. Let's give the equestrian rank to those assidui who have a certain amount of century points. That would indeed skip all monetary consideration.
Here my second thought is just this: seriously, a person who wants to be equestrian, really would mind to pay a double tax? Instead of 10$, to pay 20$ would be a burden? It's just almost 1 USD per month. If you omit one dinner, just one dinner in a year, you have almost spared the full tax money.


>>> By the way, I do not like too the aristocratical division based on the blood and the birth. In fact, I do not like any division, any elite. <<<


Regarding this, then, we have a different thinking, which is not a problem between friends who respect each other, in my opinion. I like the flexible divisions, with fair rules and mobility, with openness to all who are willing to do for it. I like those divisions that are like the grades in the school.

I agree with you in that I don't like division based on richness. I would oppose the creation of an order for the rich people. I would oppose an equestrian order which is open only for those who are rich. But my proposal is clearly not based on wealth: paying 20 USD in one year it is not wealth. Even a homeless person could pay that money :)

My proposal is based primarily on service to Nova Roma, and in order to become an eques, one would have to serve in many offices as scribe or magistrate so that he can collect the necessary century points, and only if he completed these works, could he use the possibility to enter the equestrian order. With or without the higher tax payment, that's not important to me. I can accept that basic assiduus status is enough, but I think we should require a bit more donation to NR from those who want to call themselves the knights of the New Rome.


>>>> Does need Nova Roma a merchant order? Does need Nova Roma an equester ordo? <<<<


Here I note that the merchants would not be an order. They would not have a separate rank. Their recognition as "public merchants" would only be a working statistic concept which affects only their internal working relation with our administration (which allows them to advertise on our sites for some money donated to NR).


>>> We know by story the danger of this ordo based on economical interests and privileges, we have to trust in Clio. <<<<


Our equites could not have economical interests, because they would not have any economical power. The only aspect where "economy" is in the picture, it would be the payment of a bit higher tax. But, 1) paying 20 USD instead of 10 USD is not an economical question, and calling those economically powerful who can afford 20 USD once in a year, it would be a joke; 2) the payment is not an inherent part of the proposal, we can omit the "payment of higher taxes" part from my proposal if there is a general refusal of it.


>>>> If you need an elite, so propose the establishment of an elite of men and women virtuous not one of a richer minority over the majority of the less richs. <<<<


It is exactly what I propose. I propose the establishment of an elite of the most virtuous and most dedicated men and women in NR, that would be called the order of knights of Nova Roma: ordo equester.

What I do NOT propose, and what I would vehemently oppose, it is a creation of an order of a richer minority over the majority of the less rich.

In my proposal, richness is not a factor. The only factor is hard work and dedication. And, if the magistrates accept my other advices, another factor will be learning Romanitas or participating in Roman activities. I am suggesting that knowledge, scholarship, Latin studies be awarded by century points, and participation in NR convents, participation in ludi, too. To achieve the necessary amount of century points, one should work many times as a scriba, should participate in NR activities, or visit NR convents, or to learn Latin, etc... This system shall be refined, but there are a lot of ideas about how to implement this in a very fair and realistic way.


>>> You cannot prevent anything against the power of the money. In creating this order, I am sure that you set the fox to mind the geese. Imagine a citizen paying a higher tax than others, one moment he will want to be senator. <<<<


There are three answers to this:

1. As I have already said, it is not a division based on money. We can totally skip the money part from it, if others, too, dislike this. This equestrian order would be based on virtues: work, dedication, commitment, study and eagerness to learn. The payment of the price of two cafes instead of one cafe is not a factor in richness.

2. If the division regarding paying the taxes is really a detrimental thing, we are already in a huge trouble since 2002. If I recall correctly, that was the year when taxes were introduced and that was the year of the creation of a huge-huge division in NR: the proletarii and the assidui. The proletarians of Nova Roma who are also called capite censi, are about 1000 in number, while the assidui are about 200. Those 200 citizens have 50 votes, being distributed in 50 centuries, and 1000 citizens have only 1 vote, being in only ONE century. So the fox is already among the geese since 2002, but nobody complained during these 8 years. In fact, the only complaint was that some people thought we should raise the taxes. I don't think we should, or if we would, we should allow people to decide if they want to pay more. Those who pay more, should be awarded, not infinitely, just a bit. This is why I incorporated the idea of "higher taxes" in the ordo equester
proposal, but it is in fact a separate issue, although I think it is a very elegant solution to combine it with the reform of the ordo equester.
The fox is already among the geese since 2002 - but if this issue is really a "fox", why do we tolerate that the capite censi are packed into only one century? Let's distribute the capite censi equally among all centuries! But nobody suggests this. Why? Because there is no fox. It is not a "fox among the geese" issue. Until our taxes are so symbolically low, nobody can vitiate the money, because everybody can pay such a small amount. The equestrian tax would be just a bit higher, and, as I have said, even a homeless could pay it if he wanted.
If we can live with capite censi and assidui, we can live with equites, too, and the huge division will not be with the equites, but between the capite censi and assidui. If we accept the division between capite censi and assidui, we must accept a division among simple assidui and equestrain assidui as well.

3. The third answer reflects to your third sentence when you write: "Imagine a citizen paying a higher tax than others, one moment he will want to be senator." It could not happen, or it could, but only if the person is insane. Our current assidui are already paying more than the capite censi who pay nothing. Do we have people who demand a senatorial seat because they pay to Nova Roma? No, there are no such people. The senatorial status is the decision of the censores, and mostly those people will be enlisted to the senate who held praetura and consulatus. Also, there is a limit on the number of senators. A person who would pay an equestrian tax could demand nothing more than to be treated as an equestrian. To wear the tunica angusticlavia, to be called eques, and to be in the first class. Nothing more, nothing less. Demanding other titles and offices would be insane and criminal, and until there will be people of Roman mind in NR, no equestrian person
will have more than the simple honor to be an equestrian citizen.


>>> And why not? He is a richman of Nova Roma an "eques", he pays high taxes, he must have more rights than others...<<<<


I protest again the label "richman". Nobody is a richman who has 20 USD.

But I agree that an eques should have more voting power than a capite censi or than a simple assiduus. But what? This is already done! We already HAVE a First Class.

In our current system, we have the 1-14 centuries as the First Class, they have the biggest voting power, and they are the citizens with the most century points. We could call them our current equites. My proposal changes almost nothing but gives them the name they deserve. The proposal contains various other considerations, but the essence is this:
1/ let's call the top of our First Class as equites, and
2/ (if there is a consensus on the taxation part of my proposal) let's require a higher tax from them.

The same citizens who will be our equestrians (the First Class) have already a bigger voting power, so there will be no change in the power structure.

Really, we only debate over a name. I say let's give a name to the dog: the top of the First Class shall be called equites. You say, no, let them remain unnamed, because if we give them a title they become power crazy. Well, we already have given a title to our taxpayers: they are called assidui. They own 50 votes from the 51. Are they power crazy? They do not even want to retain this title. I say we should make our society more interesting by creating various ranks and levels that existed in Roman society so that people can have something to strive for.


>>>> Why do you want an order equester? We yet have patricians and plebeians. It is enough as divisions. <<<<


Between patricians and plebeians there is no real difference. It is something determined by name only. It's something given, it's your destiny. And it is better to be plebeian because plebeians have more rights, they can be tribunes which is the more powerful office after the consulate, and they can vote in the concilium plebis. And it is not a flexible division, people can not strive to become a patrician. It is not a honorary title, rather a burden. To be patrician it is just something that is a consequence from your gens.

In Nova Roma we adopted a Roman social model of the late-middle republic when the patricians had less rights than plebeians, except when it comes to some rather symbolic offices like princeps senatus or flamen Dialis. But that's all the patricians can have what plebeians can not. And there are a lot of things that plebeians can have, while patricians can not.

The Roman patriciatus was never a honorary title or an award, and it was never granted (except with very few exceptions, until the imperial age), it was an aristocracy of name and birth, an ethnic and genetic group. If we want a system that is Roman and gives us a Roman feeling, we can not use the patrician gentility as an award or distinction. Patrician gentility, for a Roman, is something that is predestined, not earned. It's a matter of Fate and Destiny, not a matter of hard work or dedication.

What you CAN earn, it is the equestrian status, or a senate membership and the nobilitas (curule aristocracy). Si I very firmly disapprove using the patriciatus as an award to given to our best. Being a patrician does not mean quality, hard work, dedication, or anything. It's just something you are, or are not.

If we ever want to create a social group in NR that functions like an an award to the best and most dedicated citizens, it should be called the equestrian order. The equites equo privato - the self made equites. And the equites equo publico - the knigts promoted by the censores as the highest award, the best of the best.


Cura, ut valeas quam optime!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81955 From: Gaius Date: 2010-11-18
Subject: Re: *IMPORTANT* - to all here who are not Nova Roma members
Salve Anna,

Why don't you just go away?

Vale,

C. Popillius Laenas

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "lathyrus77" <lathyrus77@...> wrote:
>
> Salve,
>
> I don't think anything positive will happen in Nova Roma any time soon unless a certain senator is banned from Nova Roma.
>
> Vale,
>
> Anna Bucci
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, David Kling <tau.athanasios@> wrote:
> >
> > Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus Quinto Claudio Crispo salutem dicit
> >
> > I would encourage you to return as a citizen.
> >
> > Nova Roma has undergone some serious conflict, but I am confident that we
> > are coming upon a new time in Nova Roma where I hope that opposing sides
> > have learned the value of working together for the common good. Sometimes
> > conflict can be used to promote growth, and a new found energy can come from
> > that.
> >
> > I think improvements are in the works.
> >
> > Vale;
> >
> > Modianus
> >
> > On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 5:30 AM, quintus_claudius_crispus <
> > derwentbob@> wrote:
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > Salvete
> > >
> > > I have been lurking here for some time as I still have a great fondness for
> > > the idea of Nova Roma but feel let down by some of the people within it. I
> > > had thought that when things settled down and people decided that they
> > > wanted to just be Nova Romans that I would ask to be re-admitted.
> > > Unfortunately if everything is going to be done behind closed doors I will
> > > never have that chance. As a former Assidui and now a guest I feel this is a
> > > very retrograde step, intended to hide the disgrace rather than attempt to
> > > improve the place.
> > >
> > > Valete
> > >
> > > R.Draper (formerly Q. Claudius Crispus)
> > >
> >
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81956 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2010-11-18
Subject: ABSTRACT: Many waters: Bathing ethe of Roman Palestine
*Many waters: Bathing ethe of Roman Palestine*
by *Fatkin, Danielle Steen*, Ph.D., Stanford University, 2007 , 304 pages;
AAT 3281951
Abstract (Summary)

In order to trace the cultural changes that took place in Roman Palestine, I
look at the development of local and imperial bathing habits from the
Hellenistic to Byzantine period. By looking at the interchange of ideas and
forms within a single experiential category (one producing cleanliness), my
study traces how local elites re-deployed imperial technologies and thereby
produced a new cultural tradition - the origins of the modern mikvah. In
addition, I show how elite and non-elite Palestinians (at different times
and using different strategies) simultaneously constructed locally and
trans-locally significant identities for themselves through bodily
discipline at their baths. I do so through three case studies.

The first case study, a spatial analysis of the bathing facilities of the
Hasmonean palaces at Jericho, traces how the very presence as well as the
relative accessibility of the first purpose-built immersion pools indicate
that the Hasmoneans used control of ritual purity discourse as one part of
their strategy of internal legitimization. At the same time, their
deployment of swimming pools, Greek bathtubs, hot water delivery systems,
and immersion pools inside their well-decorated and monumental palaces
indicates that the Hasmoneans sought to legitimate their rule on the
Hellenistic world stage through their control of the resources necessary to
produce these elaborate structures.

The mid first century B.C.E. to the mid first century C.E. saw the
introduction of the first Roman-style baths, defined by hypocaust and
multi-room design, to Palestine. Hellenistic and immersion baths continued
to be built. In the second case study, I analyze the remains of these
installations statistically in order to produce an alternative typology. The
new typology, similar to the old, emphasizes the function of the each type
of bath facility and highlights the development of their functions into
specific niches. Further, the data reveal that the types of baths built by
Herod differ significantly from the types of baths built by contemporary
members of the Judean elite. Herod built an unrepresentatively large number
of Roman-style baths and a significantly smaller number of Hellenistic
baths.

My final case study compares the bath facilities of the Galilee and the
Decapolis from the first through sixth centuries C.E. The comparison allows
me to assess the manner in which the inhabitants of each region deployed the
standard elements of imperial urban culture. Recent scholarship has
challenged the notion that *Jews* considered a unique cultural group
following the two failed revolts against *Rome* (66-70 C.E. and 132-135
C.E.). Instead, they participated in common pagan culture of the Roman
empire. My analysis refines the theory by pointing out how the residents of
the Galilee and of the Decapolis did not produce urban armatures with the
same degree of elaboration and that when we examine their bathing
facilities, we find that the *Jews* built baths in both local and imperial
traditions. The difference lies in the spatial arrangement of the baths. The
Decapolitans built large, imperial-style baths, publicly accessible from the
colonnaded city thoroughfares, decorated with imported marbles and
dedicatory statues. In the Galilee, however, with the imperial baths in the
expected public spaces and immersion baths in private spaces, I show how
Jewish Galileans simultaneously participated in the construction of local
(Jewish) and imperial identities and traditions.

I conclude by bringing together the chronological study of bathing practices
by tying together common thematic elements of each case study. The evolution
of cultural identity, gender practices, and local traditions reveals how the
Judeans (and later *Jews*) were able to use imperial culture to articulate
and reformulate what it meant to be a Judean and a *Jew*. The key issues
that I track through all three case studies include the relationship between
bath facilities and private space and the heterogeneous manner in which
local and imperial traditions confronted and articulated with one another,
ultimately producing cultural change. I also look at the dynamics of the
power relationship between the leading members of the Palestinian elite and
the outside imperial elite. Further, I problematize the strict ritualistic
interpretation of immersion pools and argue that ideas of ritual purity and
cleanliness must have been more complex in practice than scholarly discourse
has thus far allowed. (Abstract shortened by UMI.)


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81957 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2010-11-18
Subject: ABSTRACT: The reinvention of Judean collective identity in a Helleni
*The reinvention of Judean collective identity in a Hellenistic world
contending with Rome*
by *Osterloh, Kevin Lee*, Ph.D., Princeton University, 2007 , 397 pages; AAT
3273523
Abstract (Summary)

This dissertation, *The Reinvention of Judean Collective Identity in a
Hellenistic World Contending with Rome * , focuses on conceptions of group
identity constructed by elite Judeans from 161-104 BCE. The newfound
dominance of *Rome* at this time profoundly affected both inter-communal
cultural exchange and the reinterpretation of local communal tradition
throughout the Hellenistic World or *Oikoumenê. * Through a complex process
of "communal reinvention," Judean elites followed Roman precedent by
creating legitimate cultural space for themselves within the *
Oikoumenê *on their own terms.

Like the Romans before them, Judean elites negotiated their collective
identity through an exchange of ideas with Greeks, commonly referred to as a
process of Hellenization. However, this was more than a mere two-sided
exchange. My study emphasizes both a triangulated conversation between *Jews
*, Greeks and Romans, and an even more complex "shared elite discourse"
consisting of a multitude of communities throughout the *Oikoumenê. * In
their interactions with Greeks and Greekness, Judean elites were informed by
the approach of their Roman "friends and allies" to Greeks and Greek
culture, while they simultaneously "reinvented" the Judean community in
emulation of the elite-constructed image of *Rome*. I develop this thesis
largely by comparing the Jewish sources I and II Maccabees with the life and
writings of the Achaean-Greek historian Polybius and Cato the Elder, his
famous Roman contemporary.

Judean emulation of *Rome* is marked by the extreme loyalty of the
individual to the unified commonwealth and ancestral custom and law. Both
elite groups emphasized these communal qualities as part of the co-option
and subversion of Greekness. Judeans followed the Roman example of claiming
the best of traditional Greek virtues for themselves--and denying the same
to certain, but not all, contemporary Greeks--while transforming the meaning
of virtue from the full range of Greek *aretê * toward a more Romanized *virtus
* : "manly courage" and "martial valor." In sum, Judean elites reconciled
their reconceived notion of "the community" in a Hellenistic context with
their native Israelite heritage by creating a Judean community that claimed
the best virtues offered by the Hellenistic marketplace of ideas within the
practice of ancestral Judean custom.


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81958 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2010-11-18
Subject: ABSTRACT: Antiochus IV and the Jews of Palestine: Causes and effects
*Antiochus IV and the Jews of Palestine: Causes and effects of the edict of
persecution of 167 BC*
by *Helfield, Michael Warren*, M.A., Queen's University at Kingston (Canada),
2004 , 214 pages; AAT MQ99629
Abstract (Summary)

In the aftermath of the death of Alexander the Great in the late fourth
century BC, the Greek speaking world was divided into three kingdoms,
namely, Macedon, Egypt and Syria. Each of these kingdoms was ruled by one of
Alexander's generals, who, in time, established their own royal houses
therein. The Syrian kingdom, ruled by the Seleucid dynasty from the late
fourth century until the mid first century BC, boasted the greatest
ethnographic diversity, stretching from the coast of Asia Minor in the West
to the Iranian plateau in the East. It is therefore no surprise to find that
the Seleucid monarchs followed a policy of tolerance with respect to the
many cultures that were well established in their respective regions.

The *Jews*, who lived in Palestine, were no exception to this policy until
167 BC when Antiochus IV issued an edict of persecution which outlawed the
practice of Judaism. Antiochus' edict resulted in the killing of thousands
of *Jews* who refused to abandon their ancient customs and the defiling of
the Jerusalem Temple.

This study re-examines the historical background to Antiochus IV's edict
against the *Jews* of Palestine, and discusses the background, both Jewish
and Seleucid, that led to so extreme a measure. It argues that the
responsibility for the edict should be placed on Antiochus IV himself
because of such factors as his concern for money and for the security of his
kingdom against *Rome* rather than on the religious ideology of a certain
group of Palestinian *Jews*. (Abstract shortened by UMI.)


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81959 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2010-11-18
Subject: ABSTRACT: Tribute and taxes in early Roman Palestine (63 BCE-70 CE):
*Tribute and taxes in early Roman Palestine (63 BCE-70 CE): The evidence
from Josephus*
by *Udoh, Fabian Eugene*, Ph.D., Duke University, 1996 , 353 pages; AAT
9715422
Abstract (Summary)

Although taxation in Jewish Palestine in the early Roman period (63 BCE to
70 CE) has been an important factor in the search for the "historical
context" both of Jesus' ministry and of early Christianity, there is no
comprehensive study of the subject. The present study seeks to fill that
lack.

This is a historical investigation that has brought together and analyzed in
detail the available literary and (sparse) archaeological evidence. The
relationship between the questions of the administration of the Jewish state
under Roman rule, on the one hand, and of Roman imperial administration
generally, on the other hand, has had decisive methodological implications
for the study. The Roman empire in the late Republic and early Principate
was neither ordered nor homogeneous. It was diverse and chaotic. The
solutions applied by *Rome* to the problems it encountered were ad hoc and
were related to a time and a place. Excluded, therefore, from consideration
in this study are those sources that are dated earlier or later than the
early Roman period. Parallels with other parts of the Roman empire, Egypt
for instance, are drawn only where there is primary Jewish evidence.

No simple continuum may be established in Palestine from the Ptolemaic,
Seleucid, and Hasmonaean periods to the different phases of Roman
domination. The subject is consequently split and studied according to the
different periods when Palestine underwent significant political changes:
under Pompey, under Julius Caesar, under Cassius and Antony, and under Herod
the Great and his successors. These divisions correspond with the first four
chapters of the study. Of the Jewish religious taxes, only the temple tax
and tithes were substantial enough to be included in the investigation. The
temple tax is dealt with in the context of the efforts made by both Jewish
and Roman authorities to protect the vast sums which were collected and
brought to Jerusalem from the Diaspora. The fifth chapter deals with the
subject of tithes in the Second Temple period. Because of lack of evidence,
taxation under direct Roman rule (6 to 41 CE in Judaea, and from 44 to 66 CE
in the entire territory) is not dealt with in a separate chapter.

One principal result of this study is the awareness of the fact that
taxation in the Jewish state during this period was intimately linked with
the state's political fortunes. The *Jews* were favoured by Julius Caesar
and Antony. Herod's taxes were not as ruinous to his kingdom as is usually
assumed. The question of the oppressiveness of taxes during the period
belongs to the complex problem of Jewish response to Roman imperialism.


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81960 From: luciaiuliaaquila Date: 2010-11-18
Subject: R: [Nova-Roma] Re: ORDO EQUESTER - The Solution Needed
Iulia Aquila Aed. Cornelio Lentulo Pont. Petronio Dextero Trib. omnibusque in foro sal.

First I direct this to you Lentule. Rather then take this response to Petronius point by point I must offer you a small request for 25 years in the future. But first I must say young man I hold you in my heart as a friend and as someone I greatly admire but also there is a component that also instinctively embraces you as a son, and in that mien I am writing this morning. I have counseled countless young people in the past and in listening to them I have noticed that the understanding of the situation has not fully been assimilated in their mindset because the experience of the knowledge of the situation has not yet been fully experienced. With that, it is difficult to make them see the subtleties where their judgment of the situation is in error as for some this greater wisdom comes from the knowledge of life experience, comes form within.
So I say to you print out this very long response to Petronius, put it away, and take it out in 20-25 years and re-read it. You will then understand.
"Historia est magistra vitae" will for you also take on a deeper, multi level meaning.

Your comment regarding "Even a homeless person could pay that money :)" – in this comment I know you meant no disrespect but also it shows how much your perception of what the homeless experience is inaccurate – a short walk in the tattered shoes of a homeless person, even here in "rich" America, will teach you about not having two tin pennies to rub together. It was a poor example and, again, when I return, if you wish we can converse and I will outline for you a scenario of the many different levels of thought and actions that would proceed when a homeless person finds a $20 dollar bill on the street after eating from soup kitchens and trash bins and sleeping on cold, filthy streets with vermin, disease and human predators. The farthest thing from this person's mind is not to find the nearest net-café, go online and pay dues to Nova Roma. This homeless person struggles every moment he is awake to live, to avoid police so s/he is not accused of loitering, to find a small bite of food to eat, to find shelter, to avoid the disdain or pity of those who have – s/he probably does not think about Nova Roma.

The statement just you made just before that "But my proposal is clearly not based on wealth: paying 20 USD in one year it is not wealth." I know many retired and disabled people, right here in the "rich" U.S. who, for that $20, will manage a meager meal plan for a week, after they pay for their utilities, shelter, medicines and healthcare. For many of those working, one minor disaster, a car repair, an unexpected bill could put in them in a situation where they would be happy to find that $20.

We are responsible for what we say, and friends are responsible to guide their friends when they perceive they can benefit from it.

When I return from my sojourn the last weekend in November we can delve deeper into the civic, social and psychosocial implications if this discussion is still going forward. I regret that I am unable at this time as I have other obligations that must be attended to. I will be without internet (I am told) this weekend in the country and probably most of next on the second leg of journey.

For the conversation with Petronius' input, there are many points that have great credence. Petronius is a wonderful and effective Tribune because of his ideas and perceptions, which I do not want to label as revolutionary, but they certainly are in the vein of an advocate of, for lack of a better term, the everyday wo/man of the majority. With very good arguments. His opinions, his mindset, are/is what contributes to a balance in this world to keep the majority from being overrun by those whose money affords them power. There is no getting around this. Money is a path to power and the result is often elitism.

I, myself, have not yet made a firm decision regarding the Ordo Equester because I am leaving myself an opening to consider other's viewpoints, however I do like the proposal that the Ordo Equester is reserved for those who have accumulated century points, those who have taken time and energy out of their busy life to devote to the Respublica. No money should be involved. This gives everyone a chance to be recognized for their work. Being a volunteer organization this would be a small reward for a job well done. Being human a small reward, a small added personal goal of satisfaction, will motivate more citizens to take an active interest in our Respublica.
I understand some will say that some simply accept a scriba position and never do anything. This will happen, we cannot police everything, it is a volunteer position, but it is up to individual Magistrate to say "Thank you for service but let's revisit our association and if you no longer have the time let's go our separate ways."

Allow me to add this as well. We can get into a sticky situation asking for a tax or fee in our current state of legality or should I say potential illegality. So I suggest in order to move forward we table the "money" issue for right now and move forward with the century points as this will not complicate the matters we are currently experiencing with the State of Maine. To err on the side of caution I suggest we be careful in labeling any new input of money as "taxes" or "fees" and stick to the term "donations" until we have our i's dotted and t's crossed. We have bigger fish to fry first.
To me Century points would be a good compromise that has some checks and balances to avoid wealthy elitism (something I DO see as a very likely possibility) that will take the effort of everyone to assure (its not fair to burden just a few) and also allow for the flavor of historicity that brings us together.

Valete optime,

Julia
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81961 From: luciaiuliaaquila Date: 2010-11-18
Subject: R: [Nova-Roma] Re: ORDO EQUESTER - The Solution Needed
Iulia Aquila Aed. Cornelio Lentulo Pont. Quiritibusque S.P.D.

"luciaiuliaaquila" <luciaiuliaaquila@...wrote:>>>> Right now I do not support a lifetime membership - it breeds stagnation and
indifference. Look at the Senate - how many of them come down and walk in the forum? Even if their names are being mentioned? They may show up to vote and in my opinion no longer have their fingers on the pulse of the Respublica. <<<
>>> They do not fully represent the citizens. <<<<


"Cn. Cornelius Lentulus" <cn_corn_lent@...> wrote: You say this about the senatores. Let me correct this slightly: the senatores do not represent citizens: they should not. They are not representatives, they are an advisory body to the consules. The representative of the people are the
various comitia, where we represent ourselves.

Amice, I understand what you say Senators "should be." But you and I know there are a small handful of this group that actually maintain any sort of communication and presence in Nova Roma and so as "advisors" some fall short.
It is naïve, in my opinion, to believe otherwise.
You and I also know that the Senators are more than advisors; they are the power players of our Respublica – to deny this is to wash everything in the rose colored glasses of some Roman Utopia – those two words together really skirt creating an oxymoron, it does not exist. Basic human nature doesn't allow it.
That is the reality of the situation regardless of what they "should be."
Accensii are more like "advisors." Although it is debatable whether they are listened to or not:)

Vale, et Valete Optime,

Julia



--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Cn. Cornelius Lentulus" <cn_corn_lent@...> wrote:
>
> Lentulus Iuliae Aquilae aedili s. d.
>
>
> >>> I caution against assigning arbitrary numbers to dues, or to Eques
> taxes/donation, for example. There are very few Novi Romani who are
> wealthy enough to afford such high dues, research is required. As we
> have done with our tax system. <<<<
>
>
> I agree with you. This is why I think the Equestrian Tax should not be more than 2 or 3 times the basic tax. If you pay now 10 USD, you would pay 20 USD (or 30 USD) if you want to be a knight.
>
> I also think there should be a minimal tax rate and a maximal tax rate in Nova Roma. Currently, our tax rate in Liechtenstein is 50.00 USD, while in Ecuador it is 1.00 USD. We know that people in Liechtenstein are far, far richer than people in Ecuador, but there ARE poor people even in Liechtenstein, and that tax rate is very discriminative towards them. And even rich people may find it unrealistic to pay 50 USD for an annual tax in NR, while other have only to pay 1 USD. For example, if we have a very rich citizen from Ecuador, he can pay for all of his fellow citizens' taxes in Ecuador, making them his clientes. From 50 USD, he can create 50 assidui, and he will rule over Nova Roma. So, even if we are very social, good willing and fair minded, we can not allow too low tax rates, not even in the poorest countries. A minimum of 5 USD, or something like this, should be set up as the lowest possible tax rate. Similary, with the highest possible tax rate,
> we should not impose 50 USD on Liechtenstein. If a citizen from Liechtenstein would want to be equestrian, and let suppose, we require 200% from equestrians to pay, he should pay 100 USD, whil an Ecuadorian equestrian should pay 2 USD to be in the highest order of top citizens. That is exaggerated fairness, that is not just. The maximum highness of tax rate should be about 30 USD (thus 60 USD for Equestrians, if we ask 200% from them).
>
>
> >>>> Right now I do not support a lifetime membership - it breeds stagnation and indifference. Look at the Senate - how many of them come down and walk in the forum? Even if their names are being mentioned? They may show up to vote and in my opinion no longer have their fingers on the
> pulse of the Respublica. <<<
>
>
> I agree with that, too. Taxes are taxes. They have to be paid yearly. That's a yearly sacrifice, the only one, we require from the most dedicated Nova Romans. If nothing else, that yearly action shall keep people linked to their community.
>
>
> >>> They do not fully represent the citizens. <<<<
>
>
> You say this about the senatores. Let me correct this slightly: the senatores do not represent citizens: they should not. They are not representatives, they are an advisory body to the consules. The representative of the people are the various comitia, where we represent ourselves.
>
>
> Cura, ut valeas optime!
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81962 From: Q. Fabius Maximus Date: 2010-11-18
Subject: Re: R: [Nova-Roma] Re: ORDO EQUESTER - The Solution Needed
luciaiuliaaquila" luciaiuliaaquila@...wrote: Right now I do not support a lifetime membership - it breeds stagnation and
indifference. Look at the Senate - how many of them come down and walk in the forum? Even if their names are being mentioned? They may show up to vote and in my opinion no longer have their fingers on the pulse of the Respublica. They do not fully represent the citizens.





Salve Iulie Aquile

The Nova Roman Senate like the Roman Senate are not the People's representatives. They advise the Consuls on what they seek, how to best govern the Republic.

It is in the various assemblies that you, Iulia and the other people have your voice, and you shape the events of the Republic, accordingly after the Consuls request you to do so.

Vale
Q. Fabius Maximus


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81963 From: Q. Fabius Maximus Date: 2010-11-18
Subject: Re: R: [Nova-Roma] Re: ORDO EQUESTER - The Solution Needed
Salvete

After listening to the points expounded here, it is fairly obvious we have reached a crossroads. Nova Roma has been in existence 12 years. I believe very few of us "old guard" believed it would last this long. However, it has and has exposed problems.

Our original goal has become tainted. The goal was to purchase 108 acres of land where our Senate could meet and the Temples to our Gods be erected. To do so was not only to revive the Roman Religion but the various cults of the Republic and Empire. In doing so we have lost our way. Rather then concentrating on a finite set of goals we have tried to do it all with the limited resources available. The result? We are stopped.
We have no true plan. Our founders left a blueprint that we follow only when expedient. Otherwise, we strike off on our own path, with disastrous results.

Pontifix Cornelius has come up with a set of proposals I find unique and worth pondering. The City or Public Horse Class had a high property qualification because they were expected to maintain horses, and all of us today who maintain horses knows it to be prohibitive expensive. It seems only fitting that this be reflected in here in Nova Roma.
People who claim that Nova Roma is populated by starving artists, are 1/2 right. We also are composed of businessmen, lawyers, tradesmen, academics and farmers, In fact I'd say pretty much there are professions that while unmentioned are important to the citizens of Nova Roma.

Money will always be needed. Those that can afford to pay, should do so. Those who cannot should plan eventually to do so. Why? Because you People are part of a rather unique renaisscience, and for that experience alone you should be willing to pay. Consider it dues not taxes. We call it taxes because it goes to running the Government of Nova Roma. But the government's expenses are rather small, so the bulk of our money sits in a bank gaining interest being set aside for that eventual goal. That 108 acres.

I hear those saying, "but this will encourage elitism."
Nova Roma's Century system is like the original Republican system formed around elitism. It is apparent that a lot of you do not understand how the Early Roman Republic worked.
The highest centuries were based on wealth. That was because the Romans were offshoots of the Etruscan military system, where the richest could afford the best mounts, arms and armor in .
When the Republic was to be defended, those with the best arms were in the front of the line, expected to do the fighting, while those with the poorest arms would either protect the richest acting as skirmishers in their front, or pushed the battle line to victory or defeat from the rear.
Nova Roma does not have an army. And we trade wealth for work. But the fact remains. "Power" here in Nova Roma is concentrated in the first two centuries where those who contribute to Nova Roma's future by their service are rewarded by controlling its direction through the assembly. This is no different then the original early Republic where the wealthiest Romans exerted the most control. The pragmatic Romans realized that those who had the greatest to lose had the most at stake and would guide the ship of state conservatively between the rocks of danger. On the other hand those who had least to lose would be the greatest of gamblers staking all on single throw no matter what the consequences.

We saw this this summer. Enraged that seculerism and frugality was controlling this republic, a bunch of penniless visionaries attempted to seize control of this republic to install their own vision.
The elitists, those who put the work of 12 years and countless treasure into this endeavor blocked them through the use of their own resources, not a secterces was spent by the treasury of Nova Roma in its defense.
So yes Nova Roma is an oligarchy, but one the poorest citizen in this Republic can rise to the top with work. No one has to be born a Patrician, birth is not held against you here in Nova Roma. What is expected of you is dedication and hard work. But if you simply are here to learn about Rome, and the Roman way and nothing else, you may do that as well. You get out of Nova Roma what you put into it. Very few oligarchies may make that same claim.

Valete
Q. Fabius Maximus
Candidate for Praetor.


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81964 From: Marcus Prometheus Date: 2010-11-18
Subject: 193 Foto di POMPEI - POMPEI 193 pics
http://www.facebook.com/album.php?aid=9861&id=100001784838485
*


Cordiali saluti a tutti i liberi e laici
Marcus Prometheus.

Nobil natura è quella che a sollevar s'ardisce gli occhi mortali incontra al
comun fato, e che con franca lingua, nulla al ver detraendo, confessa il mal
che ci fu dato in sorte, E il basso stato e frale. G. Leopardi. La Ginestra.



*


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81965 From: Q. Fabius Maximus Date: 2010-11-18
Subject: To all Nova Romanoi in the LA Area
Q Fabius Maximus Proconsul CAL SPD



The first major exhibit of the Museum of the Ancient Roman Soldier (MARS) is open. The Karpeles Manuscript Library Museum in Santa Barbara has kindly agreed to host the museum exhibit. There will be a grand opening ceremony at the museum on Saturday, November 20th, from 12 PM to 4 PM. Please attend for fun, conversation, and a viewing of the artifacts in the exhibit. The display features two of MARS newly acquired mannequins from the Dorfman Museum Figures company, as well as several newly acquired artifacts, such as a very well-preserved pilum head.

Light fare and refreshments will be served. L. Arik Greenberg, Ph.D. the Director/Curator wished to invite all of other Roman reenactment groups to attend. The purpose of MARS is to benefi all reenactors and enthusiasts of ancient Roman and Mediterranean history. Please note that Roman costumes are welcome, but spears, shields, and other large items will not be permitted inside the museum. Hopefully there will be some Nova Roma citizens that will attend.

The location and daily hours of the museum are available on the website for the Karpeles Museum http://www.rain.org/~karpeles/sbafrm.html
There are several public parking lots within one block of the museum. This exhibit will continue through the end of the calendar year.

Valete












[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81966 From: Quintus Valerius Poplicola Date: 2010-11-18
Subject: Re: ORDO EQUESTER - The Solution Needed
Q. Valerius C. Petronio sal.

Petroni, I see where you're coming from completely. The French have
courageously upheld the principles of justice among all people without class
division since the overthrow of the monarchy. This is essential for working
democracy. I applaud your efforts to prevent class distinctions, something
that plagued our alma Roma since Brutus stabbed Tarquinius.

However, you mentioned the patrician/plebeian distinction as if it were of
no concern. I wonder - is that distinction, one based on "first-comers"
really necessary? It's certainly not entirely historically accurate (the
Claudii were granted their patricianship upon joining the Roman community),
and apart from archaic religious rules that were socially created (rather
than divinely) does it even serve a purpose today? Perhaps we should do away
with that as well. That would be a no to a wealth-based class system and a
no to a kin-based class system.

Libert�, �galit�, fraternit�!

Cura ut ualeas.

On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 8:56 PM, petronius_dexter <jfarnoud94@...>wrote:

>
>
> C. Petronius Cn. Lentulo suo s.p.d.,
>
> > I understand your concern, I remember of your bad opinion of the Roman
> knights both from our private discussions and from your input to this very
> same topic last year.
>
> Yes, I do not like the divisions between citizens, I know the human nature
> and I read history to know that I am right. Clio is a teacher whose the
> lessons are quickly forgotten. I think that history must teach us and we
> have to prevent to make always the same errors. Many examples are in all
> civilizations which imposed division between a minority getting all in its
> hands and a majority with nothing except the right to be in shadow.
>
> > I have more positive picture of the Roman ordo equester, even if it was
> their social stratum that caused the republic to die, and got the emperors
> to rule.
>
> Yes and it was not based on the values of the Roman virtues but always on
> basic bad and vulgar interests. This ordo equester wanted to be the predator
> of the Roman Empire, it wanted to have more and more and it obtained the
> victory on all other citizens even on the aristocrats. I am sure that the
> coup of Catiline was the last tentative by the aristocrats to remain on the
> top, but finally the power of the money was the stronger. By the way, I do
> not like too the aristocratical division based on the blood and the birth.
> In fact, I do not like any division, any elite.
>
> Does need Nova Roma a merchant order? Does need Nova Roma an equester ordo?
> Not at all. We know by story the danger of this ordo based on economical
> interests and privileges, we have to trust in Clio. If you need an elite, so
> propose the establishment of an elite of men and women virtuous not one of a
> richer minority over the majority of the less richs. It is vulgar, known in
> all our macronations and an insult towards Clio.
>
> > The equestrian order produced such excellent Romans like M. Cicero and T.
> Pomponius Atticus. Before the Gracchi separated the senators from the
> equestrians, all senators and Roman heros were part of the ordo equester.
>
> To be within this order you did not need one virtue except 400 000 HS as
> heritage or patrimony and the agreement of the Censors to be unscribed as
> eques.
>
> > When I think of the equites, I think of the more virtuous equestrian
> order which existed from the time of the kings to the Gracchi.
>
> You forget the human nature. You have one image of this order, ok. As a
> glossy photograph. But in fact, you cannot know how a such order will evolve
> into Nova Roma and if I compare with I know on the human nature and on this
> year, I am not confident on any elite.
>
> > We will not and want not to give such a power in the hands of our
> equites. They will not have monetary power over us: on the contrary, we will
> take away their money by asking a higher tax from them. One could call this
> a socialist idea :)
>
> You cannot prevent anything against the power of the money. In creating
> this order, I am sure that you set the fox to mind the geese. Imagine a
> citizen paying a higher tax than others, one moment he will want to be
> senator. And why not? He is a richman of Nova Roma an "eques", he pays high
> taxes, he must have more rights than others... and Clio will lament. We know
> very well this scenario.
>
> Why do you want an order equester? We yet have patricians and plebeians. It
> is enough as divisions.
>
> > Our equites would be those who work more, work more for Nova Roma: the
> requirement would be the high century point (which is a given in NR for your
> community services). So, not at all an oligarchic tyranny of the evil riches
> ones! If somebody wanted to be an eques, he should have to 1) work harder
> (to reach the necessary century points) and 2) to pay more. It is like a
> socialist utopy where those who work the hardest are rewarded the most.
>
> It is an utopy. We are in the real word, remember the human nature.
>
> > As I say, it would not be a division based on money, but a division based
> on work for Nova Roma, and GIVING to NR.
>
> I suggest that the citizens who give more for Nova Roma enter on the
> Patrician order. We have yet a kind of elite, no need to have another.
>
> Optime vale.
>
> C. Petronius Dexter
> Arcoiali scribebat
> a. d. XIV Kalendas Decembres P. Memmio K. Fabio II coss.
>
>
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81967 From: luciaiuliaaquila Date: 2010-11-18
Subject: R: [Nova-Roma] Re: ORDO EQUESTER - The Solution Needed
Ave Fabii Maxime,

>The Nova Roman Senate like the Roman Senate are not the People's >representatives. They advise the Consuls on what they seek, how to >best govern
>the Republic.

The citizens are the Republic, the institutions exist for the people. The people elect the Consuls but do not give them carte blanche, they are accountable to the people and so is the Senate. The people put their trust in the Senate and the Magistrates but they do not do so blindly.

No matter how much the mantra is repeated that `the Senate is an advisory council to the Consul,' it will not make it so. In my opinion, based on personal experience with the Senate, with Consuls, in Nova Roma politics in the last few years our Senate is a powerful influential institution and unless the Senate agrees no proposal by the Consuls will go forward.
Regardless of the intention of what the Senate should be, they are still the most powerful force in Nova Roma.

Please forgive me for not being more specific for my sources right now (desperately short on time) but according to sources such as the modern scholar Lintott, the 20th century Abbott and Cicero and Livy the Roman Senate was an advisory council to the King prior to the Republic – but yet they had so little power that the Senate, behind Brutus, overthrew the King? By the middle Republic the Senate was a political institution that held sway over the Magistrates.
We are modeled on the Republic. Not the Kingdom or Imperial Rome.

>It is in the various assemblies that you, Iulia and the other people >have your voice, and you shape the events of the Republic, >accordingly after the Consuls
>request you to do so.

After the Consuls request us to do so then we can have our voice and then we can shape events? That is no voice if we must wait sit by and watch events unfold and wait until the consuls make a request. I will not be doing so, if I see something that concerns me, if I see something that would be beneficial to the Respublica than I shall begin contacting those whom I will elicit information from, learn from and discuss with in light of those concerns and suggestions.
Thank the Gods for strong Tribunes such as Petronius.

I wish you a bountiful Thanksgiving and good fortune, Fabii!

Vale optime,

Julia


--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Q. Fabius Maximus" <QFabiusMaxmi@...> wrote:
>
>
>
>
> luciaiuliaaquila" luciaiuliaaquila@...: Right now I do not support a lifetime membership - it breeds stagnation and
> indifference. Look at the Senate - how many of them come down and walk in the forum? Even if their names are being mentioned? They may show up to vote and in my opinion no longer have their fingers on the pulse of the Respublica. They do not fully represent the citizens.
>
>
>
>
>
> Salve Iulie Aquile
>
> The Nova Roman Senate like the Roman Senate are not the People's representatives. They advise the Consuls on what they seek, how to best govern the Republic.
>
> It is in the various assemblies that you, Iulia and the other people have your voice, and you shape the events of the Republic, accordingly after the Consuls request you to do so.
>
> Vale
> Q. Fabius Maximus
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81968 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2010-11-18
Subject: Re: ORDO EQUESTER - The Solution Needed
Ave,

Actually I would like to clarify a bit, for what it might be worth. The
Consuls are really the most powerful as they set the agenda for the Senate
to consider, as it should be. The Senate would not be summoned to consider
proposals without the organization and discretion of the presiding
magistrate. With that aside, if the Consul is going to promulgate leges
that would not affect or alter the Constitution, then the magistrate can
summon the Comitia to promulgate his/her agenda without seeking the advice
of the Senate. The reason the Senate does have the perception of additional
authority is that many of the legislations presented are constitutional
changes that require in addition to the support of the Comitia (the People)
but also the support of the Senate. If one of those facets is missing, the
alteration to the constitution fails. The best example of this was the
religios alterations that Piscinus tried 2 times to get promulgated. He got
the people to support the changes, but the support necessary in the senate
was lacking. In a way one can look at it similar to the US Congress. The
House of Representatives (represent the People) and thusly they are governed
by the whim of the people. The Senate (represents the States interests) and
thusly the Senate is the more deliberative body - one not ruled by the
passions of the day (if I may quote the Federalist Papers.) The Senate of
Nova Roma serves a similar purpose. Most of us have been magistrates and
have the experience and the judgment to serve as an asset to the magistrate
who summons the Senate. If the Senate does not agree with such changes,
hopefully the presiding magistrate would listen to the advice given by
his/her peers to revise the proposal so that it would achieve greater
success in a future session.

Respectfully,

Sulla

On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 5:58 PM, luciaiuliaaquila <
luciaiuliaaquila@...> wrote:

>
>
> Ave Fabii Maxime,
>
>
> >The Nova Roman Senate like the Roman Senate are not the People's
> >representatives. They advise the Consuls on what they seek, how to >best
> govern
> >the Republic.
>
> The citizens are the Republic, the institutions exist for the people. The
> people elect the Consuls but do not give them carte blanche, they are
> accountable to the people and so is the Senate. The people put their trust
> in the Senate and the Magistrates but they do not do so blindly.
>
> No matter how much the mantra is repeated that `the Senate is an advisory
> council to the Consul,' it will not make it so. In my opinion, based on
> personal experience with the Senate, with Consuls, in Nova Roma politics in
> the last few years our Senate is a powerful influential institution and
> unless the Senate agrees no proposal by the Consuls will go forward.
> Regardless of the intention of what the Senate should be, they are still
> the most powerful force in Nova Roma.
>
> Please forgive me for not being more specific for my sources right now
> (desperately short on time) but according to sources such as the modern
> scholar Lintott, the 20th century Abbott and Cicero and Livy the Roman
> Senate was an advisory council to the King prior to the Republic � but yet
> they had so little power that the Senate, behind Brutus, overthrew the King?
> By the middle Republic the Senate was a political institution that held sway
> over the Magistrates.
> We are modeled on the Republic. Not the Kingdom or Imperial Rome.
>
>
> >It is in the various assemblies that you, Iulia and the other people >have
> your voice, and you shape the events of the Republic, >accordingly after the
> Consuls
> >request you to do so.
>
> After the Consuls request us to do so then we can have our voice and then
> we can shape events? That is no voice if we must wait sit by and watch
> events unfold and wait until the consuls make a request. I will not be doing
> so, if I see something that concerns me, if I see something that would be
> beneficial to the Respublica than I shall begin contacting those whom I will
> elicit information from, learn from and discuss with in light of those
> concerns and suggestions.
> Thank the Gods for strong Tribunes such as Petronius.
>
> I wish you a bountiful Thanksgiving and good fortune, Fabii!
>
> Vale optime,
>
> Julia
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com <Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com>, "Q. Fabius
> Maximus" <QFabiusMaxmi@...> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > luciaiuliaaquila" luciaiuliaaquila@...: Right now I do not support a
> lifetime membership - it breeds stagnation and
>
> > indifference. Look at the Senate - how many of them come down and walk in
> the forum? Even if their names are being mentioned? They may show up to vote
> and in my opinion no longer have their fingers on the pulse of the
> Respublica. They do not fully represent the citizens.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Salve Iulie Aquile
> >
> > The Nova Roman Senate like the Roman Senate are not the People's
> representatives. They advise the Consuls on what they seek, how to best
> govern the Republic.
> >
> > It is in the various assemblies that you, Iulia and the other people have
> your voice, and you shape the events of the Republic, accordingly after the
> Consuls request you to do so.
> >
> > Vale
> > Q. Fabius Maximus
> >
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
>
>
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81969 From: luciaiuliaaquila Date: 2010-11-18
Subject: R: [Nova-Roma] Re: ORDO EQUESTER - The Solution Needed
Iulia Fabio Maximo Quiritibusque S.P.D.

> After listening to the points expounded here, it is fairly obvious > we have reached a crossroads.

In my opinion it appears we are having a good discussion with all parties bringing valid points. It is a rational discussion between adults in its infancy and no where near a crossroads. It is a work towards compromise.

> Our original goal has become tainted.[snipped] In doing so we have >lost our way. [snipped] Rather then concentrating on a finite set >of goals we have tried to do it all with the limited resources >available. The result? We are stopped.
> We have no true plan. Our founders left a blueprint that we follow >only when expedient. Otherwise, we strike off on our own path, with >disastrous results.

To be a true Renaissance (as you mentioned) we must recognize that the best plans are those that have the ability to change; are resilient and expand with growth. Those that can add, delete, modify and change goals. It has not become tainted Fabi, it still has the potential to become something great and this is achived by recognizing the mistakes, not dwelling on them, putting them behind us and going forward.
We have recognized for sometime that the "blueprint" itself, no matter how noble its intentions (and I have no reason to believe the intentions are less than noble)is flawed and needs to be reworked.
This comes with the experience gained from the past decade.
It is still a noble idea and it is far nobeler to continue to nurture what in reality is still a young Respublica.

> People who claim that Nova Roma is populated by starving artists, >are 1/2 right. We also are composed of businessmen, lawyers, >tradesmen, academics and farmers, In fact I'd say pretty much there >are professions that while unmentioned are important to the citizens >of Nova Roma.

Who is this who claims Nova Roma is populated by starving artists?
I fit almost three categories you mentioned, of one I fit, I am not starving. I am not a farmer nor tradesman. Each and every profession can have their rich and their destitute. Each one has its merits, each important.

>> Money will always be needed. Those that can afford to pay, should >do so. Those who cannot should plan eventually to do so. Why? >Because you People are part of a rather unique renaisscience, and >for that experience alone you should be willing to pay. Consider it >dues not taxes. We call it taxes because it goes to running the >Government of Nova Roma.

I have no problem with taxes and have associations that cost me considerably more than I have heard on the ML in the past few days. I would be amiable to discussing a raise in taxes PROVIDED it is still based on a current scale such as the GDP. I also have no problem with higher tax rates or membership fees provided that we also implement sliding scales for those who are less fortunate than say you or I, which are a feature of every non-profit organization I have ever been affiliated with.

But that has to do with taxes, aka membership fees.

The biggest concern with the Ordo Equester is it becoming a Rich Citizens club.

> I hear those saying, "but this will encourage elitism."
> Nova Roma's Century system is like the original Republican system >formed around elitism. It is apparent that a lot of you do not >understand how the Early Roman Republic worked.
> The highest centuries were based on wealth. That was because the >Romans were offshoots of the Etruscan military system, where the >richest could afford the best mounts, arms and armor in .
> Nova Roma does not have an army. And we trade wealth for work. >But the fact remains. "Power" here in Nova Roma is concentrated in >the first two centuries where those who contribute to Nova Roma's >future by their service are rewarded by controlling its direction >through the assembly. This is no different then the original early >Republic where the wealthiest Romans exerted the most control. The >pragmatic Romans realized that those who had the greatest to lose >had the most at stake and would guide the ship of state >conservatively between the rocks of danger. On the other hand >those who had least to lose would be the greatest of gamblers >staking all on single throw no matter what the consequences.

You said it yourself. Nova Roma does not have an army, nor does it have need for one. The Century system could be looked at a little more closely as well.
Elitism is not a good thing Fabi. We have an opportunity to change this. We will always the haves' and the haves' not, we always have the more influential and the less influential. Nature will take her course.
We should utilize our difference in opinions to help contribute to something that we all can live with.
How many new citizens want to join and organization where they see that they will never be able to afford to become a knight? Or join in any other interest group simply because of money.

By catering to elitism we may miss out on many opportunities.

> We saw this this summer. Enraged that seculerism and frugality was >controlling this republic, a bunch of penniless visionaries >attempted to seize control of this republic to install their own >vision.

Who are these bunch of penniless visionaries? When a statement like that is made I expect that details, such as names be provided as well, or else the statement has no credibility.

Penniless visionaries have throughout history made some of the most significant contributions to humanity. Women like Effie Walling, Frances Albeir, James Beale Morrison, Hienz Henghe, Chang-Lin Tien, Leonardo da Vinci, William Mulholland, Igor Stravinsky, Ben Franklin, and I can go on and on.

> So yes Nova Roma is an oligarchy, but one the poorest citizen in >this Republic can rise to the top with work. No one has to be born >a Patrician, birth is not held against you here in Nova Roma. What >is expected of you is dedication and hard work.

Then you do agree we do we can do away with elitism and then it follows that the Ordo Equester should be something great and noble base upon century points earned through dedication and hard work.
And you are correct that some people will eventually make more in time (btw this was one of the prime arguments used to sell adjustable rate mortgages and we see how that worked out), but even so we have a good number of retired and disabled people who just may never be able to achieve the financial status necessary yet have so very much to offer through their academic and/or life experience.

Thank you for your time.
Fabi, I will probably not have time to continue this conversation but i do hope we have more opportunities to talk in the future.
I do have faith that we can in time, as the platitude goes, make lemonade out of lemons;)

Vale optime,

Julia


--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Q. Fabius Maximus" <QFabiusMaxmi@...> wrote:
>
>
>
> Salvete
>
> After listening to the points expounded here, it is fairly obvious we have reached a crossroads. Nova Roma has been in existence 12 years. I believe very few of us "old guard" believed it would last this long. However, it has and has exposed problems.
>
> Our original goal has become tainted. The goal was to purchase 108 acres of land where our Senate could meet and the Temples to our Gods be erected. To do so was not only to revive the Roman Religion but the various cults of the Republic and Empire. In doing so we have lost our way. Rather then concentrating on a finite set of goals we have tried to do it all with the limited resources available. The result? We are stopped.
> We have no true plan. Our founders left a blueprint that we follow only when expedient. Otherwise, we strike off on our own path, with disastrous results.
>
> Pontifix Cornelius has come up with a set of proposals I find unique and worth pondering. The City or Public Horse Class had a high property qualification because they were expected to maintain horses, and all of us today who maintain horses knows it to be prohibitive expensive. It seems only fitting that this be reflected in here in Nova Roma.
> People who claim that Nova Roma is populated by starving artists, are 1/2 right. We also are composed of businessmen, lawyers, tradesmen, academics and farmers, In fact I'd say pretty much there are professions that while unmentioned are important to the citizens of Nova Roma.
>
> Money will always be needed. Those that can afford to pay, should do so. Those who cannot should plan eventually to do so. Why? Because you People are part of a rather unique renaisscience, and for that experience alone you should be willing to pay. Consider it dues not taxes. We call it taxes because it goes to running the Government of Nova Roma. But the government's expenses are rather small, so the bulk of our money sits in a bank gaining interest being set aside for that eventual goal. That 108 acres.
>
> I hear those saying, "but this will encourage elitism."
> Nova Roma's Century system is like the original Republican system formed around elitism. It is apparent that a lot of you do not understand how the Early Roman Republic worked.
> The highest centuries were based on wealth. That was because the Romans were offshoots of the Etruscan military system, where the richest could afford the best mounts, arms and armor in .
> When the Republic was to be defended, those with the best arms were in the front of the line, expected to do the fighting, while those with the poorest arms would either protect the richest acting as skirmishers in their front, or pushed the battle line to victory or defeat from the rear.
> Nova Roma does not have an army. And we trade wealth for work. But the fact remains. "Power" here in Nova Roma is concentrated in the first two centuries where those who contribute to Nova Roma's future by their service are rewarded by controlling its direction through the assembly. This is no different then the original early Republic where the wealthiest Romans exerted the most control. The pragmatic Romans realized that those who had the greatest to lose had the most at stake and would guide the ship of state conservatively between the rocks of danger. On the other hand those who had least to lose would be the greatest of gamblers staking all on single throw no matter what the consequences.
>
> We saw this this summer. Enraged that seculerism and frugality was controlling this republic, a bunch of penniless visionaries attempted to seize control of this republic to install their own vision.
> The elitists, those who put the work of 12 years and countless treasure into this endeavor blocked them through the use of their own resources, not a secterces was spent by the treasury of Nova Roma in its defense.
> So yes Nova Roma is an oligarchy, but one the poorest citizen in this Republic can rise to the top with work. No one has to be born a Patrician, birth is not held against you here in Nova Roma. What is expected of you is dedication and hard work. But if you simply are here to learn about Rome, and the Roman way and nothing else, you may do that as well. You get out of Nova Roma what you put into it. Very few oligarchies may make that same claim.
>
> Valete
> Q. Fabius Maximus
> Candidate for Praetor.
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81970 From: luciaiuliaaquila Date: 2010-11-18
Subject: Re: ORDO EQUESTER - The Solution Needed
Ave Sulla,

Thank you.

Have a wonderful Thanksgiving!

Vale bene

Julia

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Robert Woolwine <robert.woolwine@...> wrote:
>
> Ave,
>
> Actually I would like to clarify a bit, for what it might be worth. The
> Consuls are really the most powerful as they set the agenda for the Senate
> to consider, as it should be. The Senate would not be summoned to consider
> proposals without the organization and discretion of the presiding
> magistrate. With that aside, if the Consul is going to promulgate leges
> that would not affect or alter the Constitution, then the magistrate can
> summon the Comitia to promulgate his/her agenda without seeking the advice
> of the Senate. The reason the Senate does have the perception of additional
> authority is that many of the legislations presented are constitutional
> changes that require in addition to the support of the Comitia (the People)
> but also the support of the Senate. If one of those facets is missing, the
> alteration to the constitution fails. The best example of this was the
> religios alterations that Piscinus tried 2 times to get promulgated. He got
> the people to support the changes, but the support necessary in the senate
> was lacking. In a way one can look at it similar to the US Congress. The
> House of Representatives (represent the People) and thusly they are governed
> by the whim of the people. The Senate (represents the States interests) and
> thusly the Senate is the more deliberative body - one not ruled by the
> passions of the day (if I may quote the Federalist Papers.) The Senate of
> Nova Roma serves a similar purpose. Most of us have been magistrates and
> have the experience and the judgment to serve as an asset to the magistrate
> who summons the Senate. If the Senate does not agree with such changes,
> hopefully the presiding magistrate would listen to the advice given by
> his/her peers to revise the proposal so that it would achieve greater
> success in a future session.
>
> Respectfully,
>
> Sulla
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81971 From: C.Maria Caeca Date: 2010-11-18
Subject: Re: ORDO EQUESTER - The Solution Needed
C. Maria Caeca L. Cornelio Sullae, L. Juliae Aquilae omnibusque in foro S. P. D.

Um ...apparently, I am confused. I do, however, distinctly remember proposals that would have made changes in the Constitution concerning the Sacra Publica being soundly defeated in Comitia, and that they were set to be re-submitted but were withdrawn due to the veto of the pertinent Senate session. Am I thinking of different proposals than those of which you speak, Senator?

Vale quam optime,
C. Maria Caeca

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81972 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2010-11-18
Subject: Re: ORDO EQUESTER - The Solution Needed
Ave,

Yes different proposals. The one I am recalling specifically was the one
where Piscinus tried to extort Cato and myself to change our votes in the
senate. That proposal was submitted to the Comitia first and passed. Then
Compy and Severus presented it to the Senate for ratification twice and
failed to get the 2/3 necessary vote.

Respectfully,

Sulla

On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 7:48 PM, C.Maria Caeca <c.mariacaeca@...>wrote:

>
>
> C. Maria Caeca L. Cornelio Sullae, L. Juliae Aquilae omnibusque in foro S.
> P. D.
>
> Um ...apparently, I am confused. I do, however, distinctly remember
> proposals that would have made changes in the Constitution concerning the
> Sacra Publica being soundly defeated in Comitia, and that they were set to
> be re-submitted but were withdrawn due to the veto of the pertinent Senate
> session. Am I thinking of different proposals than those of which you speak,
> Senator?
>
> Vale quam optime,
> C. Maria Caeca
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81973 From: C.Maria Caeca Date: 2010-11-18
Subject: Re: ORDO EQUESTER - The Solution Needed
Ave, Senator!

Ah! OK, that clarifies things, thank you. I was becoming concerned that
memory, along with youth and beauty, had fled from me.

Vale quam optime,
C. Maria Caeca
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81974 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2010-11-18
Subject: Re: ORDO EQUESTER - The Solution Needed
Ave!

Not a problem at all. :)

Respectfully,

Sulla

On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 7:56 PM, C.Maria Caeca <c.mariacaeca@...>wrote:

>
>
> Ave, Senator!
>
> Ah! OK, that clarifies things, thank you. I was becoming concerned that
> memory, along with youth and beauty, had fled from me.
>
>
> Vale quam optime,
> C. Maria Caeca
>
>
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 81975 From: mcorvvs Date: 2010-11-18
Subject: Re: Senate Session Report/ I. Nov. 2763/TRIB. ROTA
Salve collega,

I am afraid you are slightly overestimating your authority, excluding me from Tribunes. Will you please correct that mistake in your report?

Vale,

CORVVS
Still Tribunus plebis


--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "C.Maria Caeca" <c.mariacaeca@...> wrote:
>
> C. Maria Caeca C. Aquilio Rotae Tribunis Plebis S. P. D.
>
> In this report, when reporting the votes you used abbreviations with which I am unfamiliar, and I read all tribunition repots carefully, and have done, since I became a citizen. I understand that "VR" is a "yes" vote, but what do the initials *after* the "VR" represent? Could you provide us with a list of these abbreviations and their meanings, so that we can better understand the actions of our Senate?
>
> Gratias tibi ago,
> Vale quam optime,
> C. Maria Caeca
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>