Selected messages in Nova-Roma group. Jan 21-31, 2011

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 82850 From: C. Aemilius Crassus Date: 2011-01-21
Subject: Senate Call
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 82851 From: C. Aemilius Crassus Date: 2011-01-21
Subject: Re: a passing
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 82852 From: Cato Date: 2011-01-21
Subject: a.d XII Kal. Feb.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 82853 From: GAIUS MARCIUS CRISPUS Date: 2011-01-21
Subject: An expensive table lamp
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 82854 From: GAIUS MARCIUS CRISPUS Date: 2011-01-21
Subject: Rome wasn't built in a day - online!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 82855 From: L. Livia Plauta Date: 2011-01-21
Subject: Re: Rome wasn't built in a day - online!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 82856 From: C. Aemilius Crassus Date: 2011-01-21
Subject: FW: [Nova-Roma] Rome wasn't built in a day - online!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 82857 From: C. Aemilius Crassus Date: 2011-01-21
Subject: Re: Rome wasn't built in a day - online!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 82858 From: GAIUS MARCIUS CRISPUS Date: 2011-01-21
Subject: Re: FW: [Nova-Roma] Rome wasn't built in a day - online!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 82859 From: Belle Morte Statia Date: 2011-01-21
Subject: Aedilis Curulis Edict: Creation of Official Macellum List
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 82860 From: Publius Ullerius Stephanus Venator Date: 2011-01-21
Subject: A Consul counsels...
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 82862 From: Cato Date: 2011-01-22
Subject: a.d. XI Kal. Feb.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 82863 From: luciaiuliaaquila Date: 2011-01-22
Subject: Re: a.d. XI Kal. Feb.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 82864 From: luciaiuliaaquila Date: 2011-01-22
Subject: Re: An expensive table lamp
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 82865 From: Cato Date: 2011-01-22
Subject: Re: a.d. XI Kal. Feb.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 82866 From: luciaiuliaaquila Date: 2011-01-22
Subject: Re: a.d. XI Kal. Feb.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 82867 From: aerdensrw Date: 2011-01-22
Subject: Re: A Consul counsels...
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 82868 From: Cato Date: 2011-01-22
Subject: Re: a.d. XI Kal. Feb.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 82869 From: Cato Date: 2011-01-23
Subject: a.d. X Kal. Feb.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 82870 From: Timothy or Stephen Gallagher Date: 2011-01-23
Subject: FW: [Explorator] explorator 13.40
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 82871 From: Cato Date: 2011-01-24
Subject: a.d. IX Kal. Feb.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 82872 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2011-01-25
Subject: Manú Aví tí: information on Reginald Foster's summer Latin progr
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 82873 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2011-01-25
Subject: Information on Reginald Foster's general summer Latin programs
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 82874 From: Cato Date: 2011-01-25
Subject: a.d. VIII Kal. Feb.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 82875 From: Lyn Date: 2011-01-25
Subject: Re: a.d. VIII Kal. Feb.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 82876 From: Gaius Date: 2011-01-25
Subject: Latin Help
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 82877 From: GAIUS MARCIUS CRISPUS Date: 2011-01-25
Subject: Re: Latin Help
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 82878 From: Gaius Date: 2011-01-25
Subject: Re: Latin Help
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 82879 From: jeffery craft Date: 2011-01-25
Subject: the rite
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 82880 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2011-01-25
Subject: Re: Latin Help
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 82881 From: GAIUS MARCIUS CRISPUS Date: 2011-01-25
Subject: Re: Latin Help
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 82882 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2011-01-25
Subject: Re: Latin Help
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 82883 From: luciaiuliaaquila Date: 2011-01-25
Subject: Re: Latin Help
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 82884 From: C.Maria Caeca Date: 2011-01-25
Subject: Re: Latin Help
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 82885 From: Cato Date: 2011-01-25
Subject: Re: a.d. VIII Kal. Feb.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 82886 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2011-01-25
Subject: Re: Latin Help
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 82887 From: Robin Marquardt Date: 2011-01-26
Subject: Re: the rite
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 82888 From: luciaiuliaaquila Date: 2011-01-26
Subject: Re: the rite
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 82889 From: Robin Marquardt Date: 2011-01-26
Subject: The Rite
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 82890 From: luciaiuliaaquila Date: 2011-01-26
Subject: Re: Latin Help
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 82891 From: C.Maria Caeca Date: 2011-01-26
Subject: Re: Latin Help
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 82892 From: luciaiuliaaquila Date: 2011-01-26
Subject: Re: The Rite
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 82893 From: luciaiuliaaquila Date: 2011-01-26
Subject: Re: Latin Help
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 82894 From: petronius_dexter Date: 2011-01-26
Subject: Re: Latin Help
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 82895 From: Robin Marquardt Date: 2011-01-26
Subject: The Rite & Cohorts
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 82896 From: iulius sabinus Date: 2011-01-26
Subject: Re: Latin Help
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 82897 From: Gnaeus Iulius Caesar Date: 2011-01-26
Subject: Re: Latin Help
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 82898 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2011-01-26
Subject: Re: Latin Help
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 82899 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2011-01-26
Subject: Re: Latin Help
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 82900 From: Cato Date: 2011-01-26
Subject: a.d. VII Kal. Feb.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 82901 From: Delphicapollo Date: 2011-01-26
Subject: Re: Latin Help
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 82902 From: iulius sabinus Date: 2011-01-26
Subject: Re: Latin Help
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 82903 From: Cato Date: 2011-01-26
Subject: HOW LATIN BECAME THE LANGUAGE OF THE WORLD, PART I
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 82904 From: Publius Memmius Albucius Date: 2011-01-26
Subject: Withdrawal of the censorial nota against Q. Caecilius
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 82905 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2011-01-27
Subject: Re: HOW LATIN BECAME THE LANGUAGE OF THE WORLD, PART I
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 82906 From: Cato Date: 2011-01-27
Subject: a.d. VI Kal. Feb.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 82907 From: Cato Date: 2011-01-27
Subject: HOW LATIN BECAME THE LANGUAGE OF THE WORLD, PART II
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 82908 From: q.fabius_labeo Date: 2011-01-27
Subject: Re: Latin Help
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 82909 From: os390account Date: 2011-01-27
Subject: Re: Latin Help
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 82910 From: q.fabius_labeo Date: 2011-01-27
Subject: Re: Latin Help
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 82911 From: L. Lucretius Caupo Date: 2011-01-27
Subject: Re: Latin Help
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 82912 From: q.fabius_labeo Date: 2011-01-27
Subject: Re: Latin Help
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 82913 From: Gaius Lucretius Seneca Date: 2011-01-27
Subject: Re: Latin Help
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 82914 From: Gaius Lucretius Seneca Date: 2011-01-27
Subject: Re: Latin Help
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 82915 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2011-01-27
Subject: Re: Latin Help
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 82916 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2011-01-27
Subject: Re: Latin Help
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 82917 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2011-01-27
Subject: Re: Latin Help
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 82919 From: Cato Date: 2011-01-28
Subject: a.d. V Kal. Feb.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 82920 From: Cato Date: 2011-01-28
Subject: HOW LATIN BECAME THE LANGUAGE OF THE WORLD - PART III
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 82921 From: M•OCTAVIVS•CORVVS Date: 2011-01-28
Subject: CORVI ARE LEAVING
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 82922 From: Robert Date: 2011-01-28
Subject: Re: CORVI ARE LEAVING
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 82923 From: Cato Date: 2011-01-29
Subject: a.d. IV Kal. Feb.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 82924 From: mjk@datanet.ab.ca Date: 2011-01-29
Subject: Re: CORVI ARE LEAVING
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 82925 From: Cn. Cornelius Lentulus Date: 2011-01-29
Subject: R: [Nova-Roma] CORVI ARE LEAVING
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 82926 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2011-01-29
Subject: Re: CORVI ARE LEAVING
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 82927 From: Maxima Valeria Messallina Date: 2011-01-29
Subject: Re: CORVI ARE LEAVING
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 82928 From: Gnaeus Iulius Caesar Date: 2011-01-29
Subject: Re: CORVI ARE LEAVING
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 82929 From: Robert Date: 2011-01-29
Subject: Re: CORVI ARE LEAVING
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 82930 From: Publius Ullerius Stephanus Venator Date: 2011-01-29
Subject: Re: CORVI ARE LEAVING
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 82931 From: Delphicapollo Date: 2011-01-29
Subject: Re: CORVI ARE LEAVING
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 82932 From: QFabiusMaxmi@aol.com Date: 2011-01-29
Subject: Re: R: [Nova-Roma] CORVI ARE LEAVING
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 82933 From: petronius_dexter Date: 2011-01-30
Subject: Re: CORVI ARE LEAVING
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 82934 From: Delphicapollo Date: 2011-01-30
Subject: Re: CORVI ARE LEAVING
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 82935 From: Cn. Cornelius Lentulus Date: 2011-01-30
Subject: Re: The Corvi are leaving
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 82936 From: Cato Date: 2011-01-30
Subject: a.d. III Kal. Feb.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 82937 From: David Kling Date: 2011-01-30
Subject: Re: [BackAlley] Re: The Corvi are leaving
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 82938 From: Cato Date: 2011-01-30
Subject: Re: The Corvi are leaving
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 82939 From: David Kling Date: 2011-01-30
Subject: Re: The Corvi are leaving
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 82940 From: gualterus_graecus Date: 2011-01-30
Subject: [BackAlley] Re: The Corvi are leaving
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 82941 From: gualterus_graecus Date: 2011-01-30
Subject: Re: The Corvi are leaving
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 82942 From: Cato Date: 2011-01-30
Subject: Re: The Corvi are leaving
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 82943 From: David Kling Date: 2011-01-30
Subject: Re: The Corvi are leaving
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 82944 From: David Kling Date: 2011-01-30
Subject: Re: The Corvi are leaving
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 82945 From: Cato Date: 2011-01-30
Subject: The Way Forward
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 82946 From: Robert Date: 2011-01-30
Subject: Re: [BackAlley] Re: The Corvi are leaving
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 82947 From: publiusalbucius Date: 2011-01-30
Subject: The Corvi have flied away
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 82948 From: Timothy or Stephen Gallagher Date: 2011-01-30
Subject: FW: [Explorator] explorator 13.41
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 82949 From: Cn. Cornelius Lentulus Date: 2011-01-30
Subject: R: [Nova-Roma] Re: The Corvi are leaving
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 82950 From: Cato Date: 2011-01-30
Subject: R: [Nova-Roma] Re: The Corvi are leaving
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 82951 From: Gnaeus Iulius Caesar Date: 2011-01-30
Subject: Re: R: [Nova-Roma] Re: The Corvi are leaving
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 82952 From: C.Maria Caeca Date: 2011-01-30
Subject: one citizen's perspective and opinions: was:Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: The
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 82953 From: Cn. Cornelius Lentulus Date: 2011-01-30
Subject: R: [Nova-Roma] Re: The Corvi are leaving
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 82954 From: Delphicapollo Date: 2011-01-30
Subject: Re: R: [Nova-Roma] Re: The Corvi are leaving
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 82955 From: Gnaeus Iulius Caesar Date: 2011-01-30
Subject: Re: The Corvi are leaving
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 82956 From: publiusalbucius Date: 2011-01-30
Subject: Bismarck holes
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 82957 From: Gnaeus Iulius Caesar Date: 2011-01-30
Subject: Re: Bismarck holes
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 82958 From: Maxima Valeria Messallina Date: 2011-01-30
Subject: Re: CORVI ARE LEAVING
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 82959 From: Cn. Iulius Caesar Date: 2011-01-30
Subject: Re: CORVI ARE LEAVING
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 82960 From: Maxima Valeria Messallina Date: 2011-01-30
Subject: Re: The Corvi are leaving
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 82961 From: Delphicapollo Date: 2011-01-30
Subject: Re: Bismarck holes
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 82962 From: QFabiusMaxmi@aol.com Date: 2011-01-30
Subject: Re: CORVI ARE LEAVING
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 82963 From: Gnaeus Iulius Caesar Date: 2011-01-30
Subject: Re: Bismarck holes
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 82964 From: Maxima Valeria Messallina Date: 2011-01-30
Subject: Re: CORVI ARE LEAVING
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 82965 From: Delphicapollo Date: 2011-01-30
Subject: Re: Bismarck holes
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 82966 From: Maxima Valeria Messallina Date: 2011-01-31
Subject: Re: CORVI ARE LEAVING
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 82967 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2011-01-31
Subject: Re: one citizen's perspective and opinions: was:Re: [Nova-Roma] Re:
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 82968 From: Cato Date: 2011-01-31
Subject: prid. Kal. Feb.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 82969 From: publiusalbucius Date: 2011-01-31
Subject: Re: Bismarck holes
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 82970 From: Timothy or Stephen Gallagher Date: 2011-01-31
Subject: Roman fiction
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 82971 From: Gaius Date: 2011-01-31
Subject: Re: Roman fiction
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 82972 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2011-01-31
Subject: Re: Roman fiction
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 82973 From: Lyn Date: 2011-01-31
Subject: Re: Roman fiction
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 82974 From: Cato Date: 2011-01-31
Subject: Re: Roman fiction
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 82975 From: GAIUS MARCIUS CRISPUS Date: 2011-01-31
Subject: Re: Roman fiction
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 82976 From: C.Maria Caeca Date: 2011-01-31
Subject: Re: Roman fiction
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 82977 From: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com Date: 2011-01-31
Subject: Kalends, 2/1/2011, 12:00 am
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 82978 From: Lyn Date: 2011-01-31
Subject: Re: Roman fiction
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 82979 From: C.Maria Caeca Date: 2011-01-31
Subject: Re: Roman fiction



Group: Nova-Roma Message: 82850 From: C. Aemilius Crassus Date: 2011-01-21
Subject: Senate Call
Ex officio Tribunus Plebis Gaius Aemilius Crassus

With the auspices having been taken by Augur Gaius Tullius Valerianus
Germanicus and found to be propitious , notice is given to the Roman people
that Consul Equitius Cato has called the Senate into session.

Consul C. Equitius Cato has called the Senate to meet during the following
times

1. Session
Beginning: sunrise, a.d. XI Kal. Feb. (Jan. 22) ; end: sunset a.d. V Kal.
Feb. 2764 auc (Jan. 29, 2011)
1.1. Contio
Beginning: sunrise, a.d. XI Kal. Feb. (Jan. 22) ; end: sunset a.d. VIII Kal.
Feb. 2764 auc (Jan. 25, 2011 )
1.2. Vote
Beginning: sunrise, a.d. VII Kal. Feb. (Jan. 26) ; end: sunset a.d. V Kal.
Feb. 2764 auc (Jan. 29, 2011)

The Consul has set as the following as the preliminary agenda:

ITEM I - Appointment of a CFO
ITEM II - Creation of a panel to recommend action regarding the leges
Saliciae
ITEM III - Approval of an SCU to allow voting in the comitia centuriata
regarding the repeal of the sententiae against L. Equitius Cincinnatus Augur
ITEM IV - Approval of an SCU allowing the appointments of quaestores
ITEM V - Discussion on activities in Provincia Sarmatia
ITEM VI - Discussion of the Status of "The Eagle"
ITEM VII - Discussion of age exemption for C. Cocceius Spinula
ITEM VIII - Discussion regarding dissolution of MMP


Valete





[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 82851 From: C. Aemilius Crassus Date: 2011-01-21
Subject: Re: a passing
Salve,



I too can't help much with your question but would like to give you my
sincere condolences on the loss of your family.



Vale,

Crassus



From: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com [mailto:Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf
Of David Carmichael
Sent: sexta-feira, 21 de Janeiro de 2011 02:49
To: nova-roma@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Nova-Roma] a passing






Salvete
my last grandparent on my fathers side has just recently passed away and I
am unable to attend the funeral being across the country and unable to
afford the $1,000 flight from eastern canada to western. I want to have like
a little ceremony of my own the roman way. If anyone can give me information
as to how I can do this please contact me.
Gaius Julius Julianus


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]





[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 82852 From: Cato Date: 2011-01-21
Subject: a.d XII Kal. Feb.
Cato omnibus in foro SPD

Hodiernus dies est ante diem XII Kalendas Februarius; haec dies comitialis est.


"After the death of Romulus the senate, being now in full control of
the government and having held the supreme power for one year, as I
have related, began to be at odds with itself and to split into
factions over questions of pre-eminence and equality. For the Alban
element, who together with Romulus had planted the colony, claimed the
right, not only of delivering their opinions first and enjoying the
greatest honours, but also of being courted by the newcomers. Those,
on the other hand, who had been admitted afterwards into the number of
the patricians from among the new settlers thought that they ought not
to be excluded from any honours or to stand in an inferior position to
the others. This was felt particularly by those who were of the Sabine
race and who, in virtue the treaty made by Romulus with Tatius,
supposed they had been granted citizenship by the original inhabitants
on equal terms, and that they had shown the same favour to the former
in their turn. The senate being thus at odds, the clients also were
divided into two parties and each joined their respective factions.
There were, too, among the plebeians not a few, lately admitted into
the number of the citizens, who, having never assisted Romulus in any
of his wars, had been neglected by him and had received neither a
share of land nor any booty. These, having no home, but being poor and
vagabonds, were by necessity enemies to their superiors and quite ripe
for revolution. So Numa, having found the affairs of the State in
such a raging sea of confusion, first relieved the poor among the
plebeians by distributing to them some small part of the land which
Romulus had possessed and of the public land; and afterwards he
allayed the strife of the patricians, not by depriving them of
anything the founders of the city had gained, but by bestowing some
other honours on the new settlers. And having attuned the whole body
of the people, like a musical instrument, to the sole consideration of
the public good and enlarged the circuit of the city by the addition
of the Quirinal hill (for till that time it was still without a wall),
he then addressed himself to the other measures of government,
labouring to inculcate these two things by the possession of which he
conceived the State would become prosperous and great: first, piety,
by informing his subjects that the gods are the givers and guardians
of every blessing to mortal men, and, second, justice, through which,
he showed them, the blessings also which the gods bestow bring honest
enjoyment to their possessors." - Dionysius of Halicarnassus, "Roman
Antiquities" 2.62


"Frenchmen, I die guiltless of the crimes imputed to me. Pray God my
blood fall not on France!" - Last words of King Louis XVI of France,
guillotined on 21 January A.D. 1793

"A lie told often enough becomes the truth." - Vladimir Ilyich
Ulyanov, better known as Lenin, who died 21 January A.D. 1924


Valete bene!

Cato
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 82853 From: GAIUS MARCIUS CRISPUS Date: 2011-01-21
Subject: An expensive table lamp
Salvete omnes

From the London Daily Mail comes news of the sale of a 2000 year old Roman cinerary urn. A previous owner had converted it into an electric table lamp.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1349259/Electric-lamp-sells-445k-revealed-2k-year-old-relic.html

Valete omnes
Crispus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 82854 From: GAIUS MARCIUS CRISPUS Date: 2011-01-21
Subject: Rome wasn't built in a day - online!
Salvete omnes

I know that some of you would have been unable to watch the programme last night on ITV Channel 4.

So here it is online

I hope you enjoy it, and found it as interesting as I did.

What did you think of the idea for the programme, and the way the workmen went about the job?

It would be really interesting to have your thoughts.

http://www.channel4.com/programmes/rome-wasnt-built-in-a-day/4od#3154408

Valete omnes
Crispus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 82855 From: L. Livia Plauta Date: 2011-01-21
Subject: Re: Rome wasn't built in a day - online!
Salvete,
unfortunately it's viewable only from within the UK. I guess I will spend
the next days looking for a UK proxy server which will fool the website into
thinking I'm in the UK.

Optime valete,
Livia


----- Original Message -----
From: "GAIUS MARCIUS CRISPUS" <jbshr1pwa@...>
To: <Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Friday, January 21, 2011 7:56 PM
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Rome wasn't built in a day - online!


Salvete omnes

I know that some of you would have been unable to watch the programme last
night on ITV Channel 4.

So here it is online

I hope you enjoy it, and found it as interesting as I did.

What did you think of the idea for the programme, and the way the workmen
went about the job?

It would be really interesting to have your thoughts.

http://www.channel4.com/programmes/rome-wasnt-built-in-a-day/4od#3154408

Valete omnes
Crispus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 82856 From: C. Aemilius Crassus Date: 2011-01-21
Subject: FW: [Nova-Roma] Rome wasn't built in a day - online!
Salve,



Oops, can't see it probably because I live outside UK.



Well I hope everyone else and enjoy it.



Vale,

Crassus



From: C. Aemilius Crassus [mailto:c.aemilius.crassus@...]
Sent: sexta-feira, 21 de Janeiro de 2011 19:08
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [Nova-Roma] Rome wasn't built in a day - online!



Salve Crispe,



Thank you very much for the link, I'm watching right now.



Vale,

Crassus



From: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com [mailto:Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf
Of GAIUS MARCIUS CRISPUS
Sent: sexta-feira, 21 de Janeiro de 2011 18:57
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Rome wasn't built in a day - online!





Salvete omnes

I know that some of you would have been unable to watch the programme last
night on ITV Channel 4.

So here it is online

I hope you enjoy it, and found it as interesting as I did.

What did you think of the idea for the programme, and the way the workmen
went about the job?

It would be really interesting to have your thoughts.

http://www.channel4.com/programmes/rome-wasnt-built-in-a-day/4od#3154408

Valete omnes
Crispus





[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 82857 From: C. Aemilius Crassus Date: 2011-01-21
Subject: Re: Rome wasn't built in a day - online!
Salve Crispe,



Thank you very much for the link, I'm watching right now.



Vale,

Crassus



From: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com [mailto:Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf
Of GAIUS MARCIUS CRISPUS
Sent: sexta-feira, 21 de Janeiro de 2011 18:57
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Rome wasn't built in a day - online!





Salvete omnes

I know that some of you would have been unable to watch the programme last
night on ITV Channel 4.

So here it is online

I hope you enjoy it, and found it as interesting as I did.

What did you think of the idea for the programme, and the way the workmen
went about the job?

It would be really interesting to have your thoughts.

http://www.channel4.com/programmes/rome-wasnt-built-in-a-day/4od#3154408

Valete omnes
Crispus





[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 82858 From: GAIUS MARCIUS CRISPUS Date: 2011-01-21
Subject: Re: FW: [Nova-Roma] Rome wasn't built in a day - online!
Salvete omnes

It is really annoying that this link apparently doesn't work outside the UK.

If anyone finds a way to watch it, please let me know.

Valete omnes
Crispus

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "C. Aemilius Crassus" <c.aemilius.crassus@...> wrote:
>
> Salve,
>
>
>
> Oops, can't see it probably because I live outside UK.
>
>
>
> Well I hope everyone else and enjoy it.
>
>
>
> Vale,
>
> Crassus
>
>
>
> From: C. Aemilius Crassus [mailto:c.aemilius.crassus@...]
> Sent: sexta-feira, 21 de Janeiro de 2011 19:08
> To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: RE: [Nova-Roma] Rome wasn't built in a day - online!
>
>
>
> Salve Crispe,
>
>
>
> Thank you very much for the link, I'm watching right now.
>
>
>
> Vale,
>
> Crassus
>
>
>
> From: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com [mailto:Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf
> Of GAIUS MARCIUS CRISPUS
> Sent: sexta-feira, 21 de Janeiro de 2011 18:57
> To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [Nova-Roma] Rome wasn't built in a day - online!
>
>
>
>
>
> Salvete omnes
>
> I know that some of you would have been unable to watch the programme last
> night on ITV Channel 4.
>
> So here it is online
>
> I hope you enjoy it, and found it as interesting as I did.
>
> What did you think of the idea for the programme, and the way the workmen
> went about the job?
>
> It would be really interesting to have your thoughts.
>
> http://www.channel4.com/programmes/rome-wasnt-built-in-a-day/4od#3154408
>
> Valete omnes
> Crispus
>
>
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 82859 From: Belle Morte Statia Date: 2011-01-21
Subject: Aedilis Curulis Edict: Creation of Official Macellum List
Ex Officio Statiae Corneliae Valerianae Julianae Aeterniae Aedilis Curulis

Edictum I: Creation of Official Macellum List

As per Article IV A. 4.e. of the Nova Roman Constitution: To maintain
the venues where the Ordo Equester is engaged in commerce within Nova
Roma property. It is the responsibility of the Curule Aediles to
report any changes of the Ordo Equester to the Censors, this edict
addresses the pursuit of Trade & Commerce within the res publica of
Nova Roma.

I hereby create an Official Macellum List specifically to provide
information and resources for those individuals who are both part of
the Macellum and the Ordo Equester. This list will be maintained by
the Office of the Curule Aediles.


Given by my hand 21st day of January 2764 a.u.c. in the Consulship of
P. Ullerius and G. Equitius


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 82860 From: Publius Ullerius Stephanus Venator Date: 2011-01-21
Subject: A Consul counsels...
Salve et Salvete;

As Consul of Nova Roma, I should like to request that each and every
one of us to try and act much more in keeping with the Virtues, Civic
and
Private.

Fraters et Sorors Romanii, we are all of us here, I believe, because
we share a common goal of increasing the "space" in this modern world
of ours for Living in as Roman a manner as possible.

We are, all of us (I believe), capable of making our arguments on
behalf of our opinions in a dignified and enlightened manner.

We are, all of us (I believe), capable of questioning the ideas of
others without calling either their character or sanity into question.

We are, all of us (I believe), capable of improving ourselves, and
thereby, our common discourse.

Be it resolved then, that I ask that we try and make our disagreements
within our main forum (aka Yahoo groups Nova Roma list) pointed, yet
pleasant, contentious, yet courteous, pleasantly banal, but
informative, etceteras...like unto every day, face-to-face
conversation where one would be cognizant of "real world" feed back
and consequence.

I should like to request that the Praetors try and guide those who
post here into more adult (in the genteel and educated meaning)
channels of conversation.

No dictates, just a request, as I think we can make this a truly great
forum for building a Nova Roma in which we can all be fully proud and
in which we all have an equal stake.

============================
In amicitia et fides -
Publius Ullerius Stephanus Venator
Consul, Civis et Poeta
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 82862 From: Cato Date: 2011-01-22
Subject: a.d. XI Kal. Feb.
Cato omnibus in foro SPD

Hodiernus dies est ante diem XI Kalendas Februarius; haecdies comitialis est.


ROMAN IDENTITY AND HONOR

It was to others that a Roman had to look for any confirmation of his
ability and identity. In Roman society confirmation by others was
sought as well as required. Be they the elders of his family, his
patron or his clients, army comrades, or even - in an election - the
people of Rome; no Roman could be his own judge, but could see himself
only through the eyes of others.

One needs also to consider that Romans didn't know of modern day
psychology and hence did not analyze their thoughts and feelings. They
looked not inwards but to others to understand themselves. For it was
the opinion of others which dictated the opinion a Roman ultimately
held of himself. 'A good man' was hence a man deemed worthy by
others, a man deemed honorable. But so too, in the Roman mind set
honorable was only what was actually honored. Glory or honor were also
measured only in the recognition it drew from others.

Great, noble deeds might be done, but without people knowing of them
there was no glory, no fame and no advantage to be gained from them.
And to Romans the only advantage to be gained from glory and honor
was to use it to climb the social ladder. Any credit among one's
fellow men gained by one's ability, either in office or on the
battlefield, was immediately used to further one's political fortunes;
all in the hope of finally achieving that distant goal - a seat in the
Roman senate. Hence any achievement was blatantly bragged about to
make absolutely sure everyone knew about it. And anyone too dignified
to do the bragging oneself, simply found others who would do it for
them. And so in Rome, where nobility, military and political
leadership were all intertwined, there would be no end of bragging,
showing-off and a boundless supply of flattering rumors.

But in a society in which so much depended on the light in which
others saw you, their view could not only elevate you, but so too it
could destroy you. Any news, be it good or bad, spread like wildfire
in a society that spent much of the day gossiping in the public baths,
or mingling at the forum. Graffiti was scribbled on walls, and in the
inns drunken songs might ridicule the high and mighty. In the theatres
actors would in their plays praise or deride public figures of the
day. And so Rome was a city of rumors, for the entertainment of the
many and for the advancement of those whose worst fate could be, not
to be talked about.

"The Lyre sets in the evening: it is a rainy day." - Columella

"Outside the cave he [Hermes] found a tortoise feeding. He cleaned it
out, and stretched across the shell strings made from the cattle he
had sacrificed, and when he had thus devised a lyre he also invented a
plectrum ... When Apollon heard the lyre, he exchanged the cattle for
that. And as Hermes was tending the cattle, this time he fashioned a
shepherd's pipe which he proceeded to play. Covetous also of this,
Apollon offered him the golden staff which he held when he herded
cattle. But Hermes wanted both the staff and proficiency in the art of
prophecy in return for the pipe. So he was taught how to prophesy by
means of pebbles, and gave Apollon the pipe." - Apollodorus, The
Library 3.112-115

"Within the temple of Apollon Lykios in Argos is a statue of ...
Hermes with a tortoise which he has caught to make a lyre." -
Pausanias, Guide to Greece 2.19.6-7

"Constellation Lyre: Others say that when Mercury [Hermes] first made
the lyre on Mount Cyllene in Arcadia, he made it with seven strings to
correspond to the number of Atlantides, since Maia, his mother, was of
their company. Later, when he had driven away the cattle of Apollo and
had been caught in the act, to win pardon more easily, at Apollo's
request he gave him permission to claim the invention of the lyre, and
received from him a certain staff as reward ... Apollo took the lyre,
and is said to have taught Orpheus on it, and after he himself had
invented the cithara, he gave the lyre to Orpheus." - Hyginus,
Astronomica 2.7

"The clever device of the lyre, it is said, was invented by Hermes,
who constructed it of two horns and a crossbar and a tortoise-shell;
and he presented it first to Apollon and the Mousai, then to Amphion
of Thebes." - Philostratus the Elder, Imagines 1.10

The lyre is one of the most ancient of musical instruments. For
example, in the royal city of Ur (circa 3000 BC) musicians played the
lyre for royalty, according to excavated artifacts.

In Greek mythology, the lyre was invented by Hermes. When only a
child, he pulled a cow-gut across a tortoise shell, and thereby
created the lyre. Hermes gave this lyre to his half-brother Apollo
(both were fathered by Zeus). As the god of music, Apollo became
associated with the instrument.

Orpheus was given the instrument by Apollo when only a child, and the
Muses taught him to use it. Even Nature herself would stop to listen,
enraptured by his music. When Eurydice, the wife of Orpheus, died
from a snake bite and was taken to the Underworld, Orpheus followed in
hopes of bringing her back. His playing convinced Hades to release
Eurydice, providing Orpheus didn't look back at her during the journey
home - but just as he emerged into the sunlight Orpheus turned and
gazed upon his wife, and lost her forever.

There are several versions about the death of Orpheus. In the most
widespread version Dionysus invades Thrace, home of Orpheus, and the
female followers of Dionysus (the Maenads) tear Orpheus from limb to
limb. His head is thrown into the river Hebrus, where it floats to
Lesbos, singing the entire time. The lyre of Orpheus is also thrown
into the river, and it too floats to Lesbos, beached near the temple
of Apollo. Apollo then convinces Zeus that the instrument should
become a constellation. Zeus agrees, and places the lyre of Orpheus
between Hercules and Cygnus.

Valete bene!

Cato
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 82863 From: luciaiuliaaquila Date: 2011-01-22
Subject: Re: a.d. XI Kal. Feb.
Ave Cato,

Very interesting Consul. What is the source of this passage? While modern sources on a Roman antiquity have done much to peel away the layers of time, an error I have found in a few of these sources is the over application of modern sociology and psychology to the ancient mind akin to over zealous views of some 19th and early 20th century scholars. The same words in the passage could be said of modern people esp. politicians, the media and thespians. 
Certainly it will be noble to, for example, be appointed to the Senate based on a dignified reputation, however we know that friendship (both personal and political) political views and social standing was a great influence as well. Much depended upon interpersonal relations whether a citizen was deemed dignified or not. Loyalty (maybe) ability to keep confidences and other qualities often related to power were other considerations.  Given that so many notables had some skeleton in or out of their closets (or so history tells us) and a political ally was like a poisonous serpent that had to be handled just right or you could get bit, I find the passage left a few important elements out but I can discern the inspirational value.
Gratias tibi ago

Vale bene

Julia





--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Cato" <catoinnyc@...> wrote:
>
> Cato omnibus in foro SPD
>
> Hodiernus dies est ante diem XI Kalendas Februarius; haecdies comitialis est.
>
>
> ROMAN IDENTITY AND HONOR
>
> It was to others that a Roman had to look for any confirmation of his
> ability and identity. In Roman society confirmation by others was
> sought as well as required. Be they the elders of his family, his
> patron or his clients, army comrades, or even - in an election - the
> people of Rome; no Roman could be his own judge, but could see himself
> only through the eyes of others.
>
> One needs also to consider that Romans didn't know of modern day
> psychology and hence did not analyze their thoughts and feelings. They
> looked not inwards but to others to understand themselves. For it was
> the opinion of others which dictated the opinion a Roman ultimately
> held of himself. 'A good man' was hence a man deemed worthy by
> others, a man deemed honorable. But so too, in the Roman mind set
> honorable was only what was actually honored. Glory or honor were also
> measured only in the recognition it drew from others.
>
> Great, noble deeds might be done, but without people knowing of them
> there was no glory, no fame and no advantage to be gained from them.
> And to Romans the only advantage to be gained from glory and honor
> was to use it to climb the social ladder. Any credit among one's
> fellow men gained by one's ability, either in office or on the
> battlefield, was immediately used to further one's political fortunes;
> all in the hope of finally achieving that distant goal - a seat in the
> Roman senate. Hence any achievement was blatantly bragged about to
> make absolutely sure everyone knew about it. And anyone too dignified
> to do the bragging oneself, simply found others who would do it for
> them. And so in Rome, where nobility, military and political
> leadership were all intertwined, there would be no end of bragging,
> showing-off and a boundless supply of flattering rumors.
>
> But in a society in which so much depended on the light in which
> others saw you, their view could not only elevate you, but so too it
> could destroy you. Any news, be it good or bad, spread like wildfire
> in a society that spent much of the day gossiping in the public baths,
> or mingling at the forum. Graffiti was scribbled on walls, and in the
> inns drunken songs might ridicule the high and mighty. In the theatres
> actors would in their plays praise or deride public figures of the
> day. And so Rome was a city of rumors, for the entertainment of the
> many and for the advancement of those whose worst fate could be, not
> to be talked about.
>
> "The Lyre sets in the evening: it is a rainy day." - Columella
>
> "Outside the cave he [Hermes] found a tortoise feeding. He cleaned it
> out, and stretched across the shell strings made from the cattle he
> had sacrificed, and when he had thus devised a lyre he also invented a
> plectrum ... When Apollon heard the lyre, he exchanged the cattle for
> that. And as Hermes was tending the cattle, this time he fashioned a
> shepherd's pipe which he proceeded to play. Covetous also of this,
> Apollon offered him the golden staff which he held when he herded
> cattle. But Hermes wanted both the staff and proficiency in the art of
> prophecy in return for the pipe. So he was taught how to prophesy by
> means of pebbles, and gave Apollon the pipe." - Apollodorus, The
> Library 3.112-115
>
> "Within the temple of Apollon Lykios in Argos is a statue of ...
> Hermes with a tortoise which he has caught to make a lyre." -
> Pausanias, Guide to Greece 2.19.6-7
>
> "Constellation Lyre: Others say that when Mercury [Hermes] first made
> the lyre on Mount Cyllene in Arcadia, he made it with seven strings to
> correspond to the number of Atlantides, since Maia, his mother, was of
> their company. Later, when he had driven away the cattle of Apollo and
> had been caught in the act, to win pardon more easily, at Apollo's
> request he gave him permission to claim the invention of the lyre, and
> received from him a certain staff as reward ... Apollo took the lyre,
> and is said to have taught Orpheus on it, and after he himself had
> invented the cithara, he gave the lyre to Orpheus." - Hyginus,
> Astronomica 2.7
>
> "The clever device of the lyre, it is said, was invented by Hermes,
> who constructed it of two horns and a crossbar and a tortoise-shell;
> and he presented it first to Apollon and the Mousai, then to Amphion
> of Thebes." - Philostratus the Elder, Imagines 1.10
>
> The lyre is one of the most ancient of musical instruments. For
> example, in the royal city of Ur (circa 3000 BC) musicians played the
> lyre for royalty, according to excavated artifacts.
>
> In Greek mythology, the lyre was invented by Hermes. When only a
> child, he pulled a cow-gut across a tortoise shell, and thereby
> created the lyre. Hermes gave this lyre to his half-brother Apollo
> (both were fathered by Zeus). As the god of music, Apollo became
> associated with the instrument.
>
> Orpheus was given the instrument by Apollo when only a child, and the
> Muses taught him to use it. Even Nature herself would stop to listen,
> enraptured by his music. When Eurydice, the wife of Orpheus, died
> from a snake bite and was taken to the Underworld, Orpheus followed in
> hopes of bringing her back. His playing convinced Hades to release
> Eurydice, providing Orpheus didn't look back at her during the journey
> home - but just as he emerged into the sunlight Orpheus turned and
> gazed upon his wife, and lost her forever.
>
> There are several versions about the death of Orpheus. In the most
> widespread version Dionysus invades Thrace, home of Orpheus, and the
> female followers of Dionysus (the Maenads) tear Orpheus from limb to
> limb. His head is thrown into the river Hebrus, where it floats to
> Lesbos, singing the entire time. The lyre of Orpheus is also thrown
> into the river, and it too floats to Lesbos, beached near the temple
> of Apollo. Apollo then convinces Zeus that the instrument should
> become a constellation. Zeus agrees, and places the lyre of Orpheus
> between Hercules and Cygnus.
>
> Valete bene!
>
> Cato
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 82864 From: luciaiuliaaquila Date: 2011-01-22
Subject: Re: An expensive table lamp
Salve,

Wonderful symbols on the urn! Thank you Crispe! As a member of the the "cultus seniores venerabilis" (pre-retirement half of age of senex) or as our Lentulus puts it "cult of the elderly";) I just may commission a similar urn, personalized of course, in anticipation of my own transition.

Vale bene,

Julia

"Nihil igitur adferunt qui in re gerenda versari senectutem negant, similesque sunt ut si qui gubernatorem in navigando nihil agere dicant, cum alii malos scandant, alii per foros cursent, alii sentinam exhauriant, ille autem clavum tenens quietus sedeat in puppi, non faciat ea quae iuvenes. At vero multo maiora et meliora facit. Non viribus aut velocitate aut celeritate corporum res magnae geruntur, sed consilio, auctoritate, sententia; quibus non modo non orbari, sed etiam augeri senectus solet." M. Tulli Ciceronis: Cato Maior de Senectute VI; 17
Trans:
"Those, therefore, who allege that old age is devoid of useful activity adduce nothing to the purpose, and are like those who would say that the pilot does nothing in the sailing of his ship, because, while others are climbing the masts, or running about the gangways, or working at the pumps, he sits quietly in the stern and simply holds the tiller. He may not be doing what younger members of the crew are doing, but what he does is better and much more important. It is not by muscle, speed, or physical dexterity that great things are achieved, but by reflection, force of character, and judgement; in these qualities old age is usually not only not poorer, but is even richer."


--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "GAIUS MARCIUS CRISPUS" <jbshr1pwa@...> wrote:
>
> Salvete omnes
>
> From the London Daily Mail comes news of the sale of a 2000 year old Roman cinerary urn. A previous owner had converted it into an electric table lamp.
>
> http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1349259/Electric-lamp-sells-445k-revealed-2k-year-old-relic.html
>
> Valete omnes
> Crispus
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 82865 From: Cato Date: 2011-01-22
Subject: Re: a.d. XI Kal. Feb.
Cato Iuliae Aquilae sal.

It is here:

http://www.roman-empire.net/index.html

It's an interesting series, but there doesn't seem to be any source for it itself. I *think* it may be an online version of a textbook several decades old, but I've found it very useful :)

Vale!

Cato

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "luciaiuliaaquila" <luciaiuliaaquila@...> wrote:
>
> Ave Cato,
>
> Very interesting Consul. What is the source of this passage? While modern sources on a Roman antiquity have done much to peel away the layers of time, an error I have found in a few of these sources is the over application of modern sociology and psychology to the ancient mind akin to over zealous views of some 19th and early 20th century scholars. The same words in the passage could be said of modern people esp. politicians, the media and thespians. 
> Certainly it will be noble to, for example, be appointed to the Senate based on a dignified reputation, however we know that friendship (both personal and political) political views and social standing was a great influence as well. Much depended upon interpersonal relations whether a citizen was deemed dignified or not. Loyalty (maybe) ability to keep confidences and other qualities often related to power were other considerations.  Given that so many notables had some skeleton in or out of their closets (or so history tells us) and a political ally was like a poisonous serpent that had to be handled just right or you could get bit, I find the passage left a few important elements out but I can discern the inspirational value.
> Gratias tibi ago
>
> Vale bene
>
> Julia
>
>
>
>
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Cato" <catoinnyc@> wrote:
> >
> > Cato omnibus in foro SPD
> >
> > Hodiernus dies est ante diem XI Kalendas Februarius; haecdies comitialis est.
> >
> >
> > ROMAN IDENTITY AND HONOR
> >
> > It was to others that a Roman had to look for any confirmation of his
> > ability and identity. In Roman society confirmation by others was
> > sought as well as required. Be they the elders of his family, his
> > patron or his clients, army comrades, or even - in an election - the
> > people of Rome; no Roman could be his own judge, but could see himself
> > only through the eyes of others.
> >
> > One needs also to consider that Romans didn't know of modern day
> > psychology and hence did not analyze their thoughts and feelings. They
> > looked not inwards but to others to understand themselves. For it was
> > the opinion of others which dictated the opinion a Roman ultimately
> > held of himself. 'A good man' was hence a man deemed worthy by
> > others, a man deemed honorable. But so too, in the Roman mind set
> > honorable was only what was actually honored. Glory or honor were also
> > measured only in the recognition it drew from others.
> >
> > Great, noble deeds might be done, but without people knowing of them
> > there was no glory, no fame and no advantage to be gained from them.
> > And to Romans the only advantage to be gained from glory and honor
> > was to use it to climb the social ladder. Any credit among one's
> > fellow men gained by one's ability, either in office or on the
> > battlefield, was immediately used to further one's political fortunes;
> > all in the hope of finally achieving that distant goal - a seat in the
> > Roman senate. Hence any achievement was blatantly bragged about to
> > make absolutely sure everyone knew about it. And anyone too dignified
> > to do the bragging oneself, simply found others who would do it for
> > them. And so in Rome, where nobility, military and political
> > leadership were all intertwined, there would be no end of bragging,
> > showing-off and a boundless supply of flattering rumors.
> >
> > But in a society in which so much depended on the light in which
> > others saw you, their view could not only elevate you, but so too it
> > could destroy you. Any news, be it good or bad, spread like wildfire
> > in a society that spent much of the day gossiping in the public baths,
> > or mingling at the forum. Graffiti was scribbled on walls, and in the
> > inns drunken songs might ridicule the high and mighty. In the theatres
> > actors would in their plays praise or deride public figures of the
> > day. And so Rome was a city of rumors, for the entertainment of the
> > many and for the advancement of those whose worst fate could be, not
> > to be talked about.
> >
> > "The Lyre sets in the evening: it is a rainy day." - Columella
> >
> > "Outside the cave he [Hermes] found a tortoise feeding. He cleaned it
> > out, and stretched across the shell strings made from the cattle he
> > had sacrificed, and when he had thus devised a lyre he also invented a
> > plectrum ... When Apollon heard the lyre, he exchanged the cattle for
> > that. And as Hermes was tending the cattle, this time he fashioned a
> > shepherd's pipe which he proceeded to play. Covetous also of this,
> > Apollon offered him the golden staff which he held when he herded
> > cattle. But Hermes wanted both the staff and proficiency in the art of
> > prophecy in return for the pipe. So he was taught how to prophesy by
> > means of pebbles, and gave Apollon the pipe." - Apollodorus, The
> > Library 3.112-115
> >
> > "Within the temple of Apollon Lykios in Argos is a statue of ...
> > Hermes with a tortoise which he has caught to make a lyre." -
> > Pausanias, Guide to Greece 2.19.6-7
> >
> > "Constellation Lyre: Others say that when Mercury [Hermes] first made
> > the lyre on Mount Cyllene in Arcadia, he made it with seven strings to
> > correspond to the number of Atlantides, since Maia, his mother, was of
> > their company. Later, when he had driven away the cattle of Apollo and
> > had been caught in the act, to win pardon more easily, at Apollo's
> > request he gave him permission to claim the invention of the lyre, and
> > received from him a certain staff as reward ... Apollo took the lyre,
> > and is said to have taught Orpheus on it, and after he himself had
> > invented the cithara, he gave the lyre to Orpheus." - Hyginus,
> > Astronomica 2.7
> >
> > "The clever device of the lyre, it is said, was invented by Hermes,
> > who constructed it of two horns and a crossbar and a tortoise-shell;
> > and he presented it first to Apollon and the Mousai, then to Amphion
> > of Thebes." - Philostratus the Elder, Imagines 1.10
> >
> > The lyre is one of the most ancient of musical instruments. For
> > example, in the royal city of Ur (circa 3000 BC) musicians played the
> > lyre for royalty, according to excavated artifacts.
> >
> > In Greek mythology, the lyre was invented by Hermes. When only a
> > child, he pulled a cow-gut across a tortoise shell, and thereby
> > created the lyre. Hermes gave this lyre to his half-brother Apollo
> > (both were fathered by Zeus). As the god of music, Apollo became
> > associated with the instrument.
> >
> > Orpheus was given the instrument by Apollo when only a child, and the
> > Muses taught him to use it. Even Nature herself would stop to listen,
> > enraptured by his music. When Eurydice, the wife of Orpheus, died
> > from a snake bite and was taken to the Underworld, Orpheus followed in
> > hopes of bringing her back. His playing convinced Hades to release
> > Eurydice, providing Orpheus didn't look back at her during the journey
> > home - but just as he emerged into the sunlight Orpheus turned and
> > gazed upon his wife, and lost her forever.
> >
> > There are several versions about the death of Orpheus. In the most
> > widespread version Dionysus invades Thrace, home of Orpheus, and the
> > female followers of Dionysus (the Maenads) tear Orpheus from limb to
> > limb. His head is thrown into the river Hebrus, where it floats to
> > Lesbos, singing the entire time. The lyre of Orpheus is also thrown
> > into the river, and it too floats to Lesbos, beached near the temple
> > of Apollo. Apollo then convinces Zeus that the instrument should
> > become a constellation. Zeus agrees, and places the lyre of Orpheus
> > between Hercules and Cygnus.
> >
> > Valete bene!
> >
> > Cato
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 82866 From: luciaiuliaaquila Date: 2011-01-22
Subject: Re: a.d. XI Kal. Feb.
Iulia Catoni s.d.

Thank you so much!
As for sources I have a book in my library that is also very interesting but it has very few source citations fortunately it only has a portion of one chapter that is of interest to me in relation to the subject matter I am researching. I shall persevere:)

Cura ut valeas,

Julia


--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Cato" <catoinnyc@...> wrote:
>
> Cato Iuliae Aquilae sal.
>
> It is here:
>
> http://www.roman-empire.net/index.html
>
> It's an interesting series, but there doesn't seem to be any source for it itself. I *think* it may be an online version of a textbook several decades old, but I've found it very useful :)
>
> Vale!
>
> Cato
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "luciaiuliaaquila" <luciaiuliaaquila@> wrote:
> >
> > Ave Cato,
> >
> > Very interesting Consul. What is the source of this passage? While modern sources on a Roman antiquity have done much to peel away the layers of time, an error I have found in a few of these sources is the over application of modern sociology and psychology to the ancient mind akin to over zealous views of some 19th and early 20th century scholars. The same words in the passage could be said of modern people esp. politicians, the media and thespians. 
> > Certainly it will be noble to, for example, be appointed to the Senate based on a dignified reputation, however we know that friendship (both personal and political) political views and social standing was a great influence as well. Much depended upon interpersonal relations whether a citizen was deemed dignified or not. Loyalty (maybe) ability to keep confidences and other qualities often related to power were other considerations.  Given that so many notables had some skeleton in or out of their closets (or so history tells us) and a political ally was like a poisonous serpent that had to be handled just right or you could get bit, I find the passage left a few important elements out but I can discern the inspirational value.
> > Gratias tibi ago
> >
> > Vale bene
> >
> > Julia
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Cato" <catoinnyc@> wrote:
> > >
> > > Cato omnibus in foro SPD
> > >
> > > Hodiernus dies est ante diem XI Kalendas Februarius; haecdies comitialis est.
> > >
> > >
> > > ROMAN IDENTITY AND HONOR
> > >
> > > It was to others that a Roman had to look for any confirmation of his
> > > ability and identity. In Roman society confirmation by others was
> > > sought as well as required. Be they the elders of his family, his
> > > patron or his clients, army comrades, or even - in an election - the
> > > people of Rome; no Roman could be his own judge, but could see himself
> > > only through the eyes of others.
> > >
> > > One needs also to consider that Romans didn't know of modern day
> > > psychology and hence did not analyze their thoughts and feelings. They
> > > looked not inwards but to others to understand themselves. For it was
> > > the opinion of others which dictated the opinion a Roman ultimately
> > > held of himself. 'A good man' was hence a man deemed worthy by
> > > others, a man deemed honorable. But so too, in the Roman mind set
> > > honorable was only what was actually honored. Glory or honor were also
> > > measured only in the recognition it drew from others.
> > >
> > > Great, noble deeds might be done, but without people knowing of them
> > > there was no glory, no fame and no advantage to be gained from them.
> > > And to Romans the only advantage to be gained from glory and honor
> > > was to use it to climb the social ladder. Any credit among one's
> > > fellow men gained by one's ability, either in office or on the
> > > battlefield, was immediately used to further one's political fortunes;
> > > all in the hope of finally achieving that distant goal - a seat in the
> > > Roman senate. Hence any achievement was blatantly bragged about to
> > > make absolutely sure everyone knew about it. And anyone too dignified
> > > to do the bragging oneself, simply found others who would do it for
> > > them. And so in Rome, where nobility, military and political
> > > leadership were all intertwined, there would be no end of bragging,
> > > showing-off and a boundless supply of flattering rumors.
> > >
> > > But in a society in which so much depended on the light in which
> > > others saw you, their view could not only elevate you, but so too it
> > > could destroy you. Any news, be it good or bad, spread like wildfire
> > > in a society that spent much of the day gossiping in the public baths,
> > > or mingling at the forum. Graffiti was scribbled on walls, and in the
> > > inns drunken songs might ridicule the high and mighty. In the theatres
> > > actors would in their plays praise or deride public figures of the
> > > day. And so Rome was a city of rumors, for the entertainment of the
> > > many and for the advancement of those whose worst fate could be, not
> > > to be talked about.
> > >
> > > "The Lyre sets in the evening: it is a rainy day." - Columella
> > >
> > > "Outside the cave he [Hermes] found a tortoise feeding. He cleaned it
> > > out, and stretched across the shell strings made from the cattle he
> > > had sacrificed, and when he had thus devised a lyre he also invented a
> > > plectrum ... When Apollon heard the lyre, he exchanged the cattle for
> > > that. And as Hermes was tending the cattle, this time he fashioned a
> > > shepherd's pipe which he proceeded to play. Covetous also of this,
> > > Apollon offered him the golden staff which he held when he herded
> > > cattle. But Hermes wanted both the staff and proficiency in the art of
> > > prophecy in return for the pipe. So he was taught how to prophesy by
> > > means of pebbles, and gave Apollon the pipe." - Apollodorus, The
> > > Library 3.112-115
> > >
> > > "Within the temple of Apollon Lykios in Argos is a statue of ...
> > > Hermes with a tortoise which he has caught to make a lyre." -
> > > Pausanias, Guide to Greece 2.19.6-7
> > >
> > > "Constellation Lyre: Others say that when Mercury [Hermes] first made
> > > the lyre on Mount Cyllene in Arcadia, he made it with seven strings to
> > > correspond to the number of Atlantides, since Maia, his mother, was of
> > > their company. Later, when he had driven away the cattle of Apollo and
> > > had been caught in the act, to win pardon more easily, at Apollo's
> > > request he gave him permission to claim the invention of the lyre, and
> > > received from him a certain staff as reward ... Apollo took the lyre,
> > > and is said to have taught Orpheus on it, and after he himself had
> > > invented the cithara, he gave the lyre to Orpheus." - Hyginus,
> > > Astronomica 2.7
> > >
> > > "The clever device of the lyre, it is said, was invented by Hermes,
> > > who constructed it of two horns and a crossbar and a tortoise-shell;
> > > and he presented it first to Apollon and the Mousai, then to Amphion
> > > of Thebes." - Philostratus the Elder, Imagines 1.10
> > >
> > > The lyre is one of the most ancient of musical instruments. For
> > > example, in the royal city of Ur (circa 3000 BC) musicians played the
> > > lyre for royalty, according to excavated artifacts.
> > >
> > > In Greek mythology, the lyre was invented by Hermes. When only a
> > > child, he pulled a cow-gut across a tortoise shell, and thereby
> > > created the lyre. Hermes gave this lyre to his half-brother Apollo
> > > (both were fathered by Zeus). As the god of music, Apollo became
> > > associated with the instrument.
> > >
> > > Orpheus was given the instrument by Apollo when only a child, and the
> > > Muses taught him to use it. Even Nature herself would stop to listen,
> > > enraptured by his music. When Eurydice, the wife of Orpheus, died
> > > from a snake bite and was taken to the Underworld, Orpheus followed in
> > > hopes of bringing her back. His playing convinced Hades to release
> > > Eurydice, providing Orpheus didn't look back at her during the journey
> > > home - but just as he emerged into the sunlight Orpheus turned and
> > > gazed upon his wife, and lost her forever.
> > >
> > > There are several versions about the death of Orpheus. In the most
> > > widespread version Dionysus invades Thrace, home of Orpheus, and the
> > > female followers of Dionysus (the Maenads) tear Orpheus from limb to
> > > limb. His head is thrown into the river Hebrus, where it floats to
> > > Lesbos, singing the entire time. The lyre of Orpheus is also thrown
> > > into the river, and it too floats to Lesbos, beached near the temple
> > > of Apollo. Apollo then convinces Zeus that the instrument should
> > > become a constellation. Zeus agrees, and places the lyre of Orpheus
> > > between Hercules and Cygnus.
> > >
> > > Valete bene!
> > >
> > > Cato
> > >
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 82867 From: aerdensrw Date: 2011-01-22
Subject: Re: A Consul counsels...
Stephanus--P. Ullerius Stephanus Consul s.p.d.

I am most happy to do that, and I'm even happier to see the request made by someone who lives it.

Vale in pace Deorum.

Paulla

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Publius Ullerius Stephanus Venator <famila.ulleria.venii@...> wrote:
>
> Salve et Salvete;
>
> As Consul of Nova Roma, I should like to request that each and every
> one of us to try and act much more in keeping with the Virtues, Civic
> and
> Private.
>
> Fraters et Sorors Romanii, we are all of us here, I believe, because
> we share a common goal of increasing the "space" in this modern world
> of ours for Living in as Roman a manner as possible.
>
> We are, all of us (I believe), capable of making our arguments on
> behalf of our opinions in a dignified and enlightened manner.
>
> We are, all of us (I believe), capable of questioning the ideas of
> others without calling either their character or sanity into question.
>
> We are, all of us (I believe), capable of improving ourselves, and
> thereby, our common discourse.
>
> Be it resolved then, that I ask that we try and make our disagreements
> within our main forum (aka Yahoo groups Nova Roma list) pointed, yet
> pleasant, contentious, yet courteous, pleasantly banal, but
> informative, etceteras...like unto every day, face-to-face
> conversation where one would be cognizant of "real world" feed back
> and consequence.
>
> I should like to request that the Praetors try and guide those who
> post here into more adult (in the genteel and educated meaning)
> channels of conversation.
>
> No dictates, just a request, as I think we can make this a truly great
> forum for building a Nova Roma in which we can all be fully proud and
> in which we all have an equal stake.
>
> ============================
> In amicitia et fides -
> Publius Ullerius Stephanus Venator
> Consul, Civis et Poeta
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 82868 From: Cato Date: 2011-01-22
Subject: Re: a.d. XI Kal. Feb.
Cato Iuliae Aquilae sal.

I've always been fascinated by the level of what we'd call "self-awareness" the Romans had. They were absolutely dedicated to getting their names on anything big enough to carve them onto :)

Their sense of self was truly formed by their sense of the community of which they were a part, which is what made citizenship so precious. It also goes a long way to explaining how they viewed the sacra publica and the inseparability of the religious and public spheres: anything that happened publicly had a religious tone, and all religious public acts had the welfare and care of the state as their catalyst.

Vale,

Cato

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "luciaiuliaaquila" <luciaiuliaaquila@...> wrote:
>
> Iulia Catoni s.d.
>
> Thank you so much!
> As for sources I have a book in my library that is also very interesting but it has very few source citations fortunately it only has a portion of one chapter that is of interest to me in relation to the subject matter I am researching. I shall persevere:)
>
> Cura ut valeas,
>
> Julia
>
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Cato" <catoinnyc@> wrote:
> >
> > Cato Iuliae Aquilae sal.
> >
> > It is here:
> >
> > http://www.roman-empire.net/index.html
> >
> > It's an interesting series, but there doesn't seem to be any source for it itself. I *think* it may be an online version of a textbook several decades old, but I've found it very useful :)
> >
> > Vale!
> >
> > Cato
> >
> > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "luciaiuliaaquila" <luciaiuliaaquila@> wrote:
> > >
> > > Ave Cato,
> > >
> > > Very interesting Consul. What is the source of this passage? While modern sources on a Roman antiquity have done much to peel away the layers of time, an error I have found in a few of these sources is the over application of modern sociology and psychology to the ancient mind akin to over zealous views of some 19th and early 20th century scholars. The same words in the passage could be said of modern people esp. politicians, the media and thespians. 
> > > Certainly it will be noble to, for example, be appointed to the Senate based on a dignified reputation, however we know that friendship (both personal and political) political views and social standing was a great influence as well. Much depended upon interpersonal relations whether a citizen was deemed dignified or not. Loyalty (maybe) ability to keep confidences and other qualities often related to power were other considerations.  Given that so many notables had some skeleton in or out of their closets (or so history tells us) and a political ally was like a poisonous serpent that had to be handled just right or you could get bit, I find the passage left a few important elements out but I can discern the inspirational value.
> > > Gratias tibi ago
> > >
> > > Vale bene
> > >
> > > Julia
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Cato" <catoinnyc@> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Cato omnibus in foro SPD
> > > >
> > > > Hodiernus dies est ante diem XI Kalendas Februarius; haecdies comitialis est.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > ROMAN IDENTITY AND HONOR
> > > >
> > > > It was to others that a Roman had to look for any confirmation of his
> > > > ability and identity. In Roman society confirmation by others was
> > > > sought as well as required. Be they the elders of his family, his
> > > > patron or his clients, army comrades, or even - in an election - the
> > > > people of Rome; no Roman could be his own judge, but could see himself
> > > > only through the eyes of others.
> > > >
> > > > One needs also to consider that Romans didn't know of modern day
> > > > psychology and hence did not analyze their thoughts and feelings. They
> > > > looked not inwards but to others to understand themselves. For it was
> > > > the opinion of others which dictated the opinion a Roman ultimately
> > > > held of himself. 'A good man' was hence a man deemed worthy by
> > > > others, a man deemed honorable. But so too, in the Roman mind set
> > > > honorable was only what was actually honored. Glory or honor were also
> > > > measured only in the recognition it drew from others.
> > > >
> > > > Great, noble deeds might be done, but without people knowing of them
> > > > there was no glory, no fame and no advantage to be gained from them.
> > > > And to Romans the only advantage to be gained from glory and honor
> > > > was to use it to climb the social ladder. Any credit among one's
> > > > fellow men gained by one's ability, either in office or on the
> > > > battlefield, was immediately used to further one's political fortunes;
> > > > all in the hope of finally achieving that distant goal - a seat in the
> > > > Roman senate. Hence any achievement was blatantly bragged about to
> > > > make absolutely sure everyone knew about it. And anyone too dignified
> > > > to do the bragging oneself, simply found others who would do it for
> > > > them. And so in Rome, where nobility, military and political
> > > > leadership were all intertwined, there would be no end of bragging,
> > > > showing-off and a boundless supply of flattering rumors.
> > > >
> > > > But in a society in which so much depended on the light in which
> > > > others saw you, their view could not only elevate you, but so too it
> > > > could destroy you. Any news, be it good or bad, spread like wildfire
> > > > in a society that spent much of the day gossiping in the public baths,
> > > > or mingling at the forum. Graffiti was scribbled on walls, and in the
> > > > inns drunken songs might ridicule the high and mighty. In the theatres
> > > > actors would in their plays praise or deride public figures of the
> > > > day. And so Rome was a city of rumors, for the entertainment of the
> > > > many and for the advancement of those whose worst fate could be, not
> > > > to be talked about.
> > > >
> > > > "The Lyre sets in the evening: it is a rainy day." - Columella
> > > >
> > > > "Outside the cave he [Hermes] found a tortoise feeding. He cleaned it
> > > > out, and stretched across the shell strings made from the cattle he
> > > > had sacrificed, and when he had thus devised a lyre he also invented a
> > > > plectrum ... When Apollon heard the lyre, he exchanged the cattle for
> > > > that. And as Hermes was tending the cattle, this time he fashioned a
> > > > shepherd's pipe which he proceeded to play. Covetous also of this,
> > > > Apollon offered him the golden staff which he held when he herded
> > > > cattle. But Hermes wanted both the staff and proficiency in the art of
> > > > prophecy in return for the pipe. So he was taught how to prophesy by
> > > > means of pebbles, and gave Apollon the pipe." - Apollodorus, The
> > > > Library 3.112-115
> > > >
> > > > "Within the temple of Apollon Lykios in Argos is a statue of ...
> > > > Hermes with a tortoise which he has caught to make a lyre." -
> > > > Pausanias, Guide to Greece 2.19.6-7
> > > >
> > > > "Constellation Lyre: Others say that when Mercury [Hermes] first made
> > > > the lyre on Mount Cyllene in Arcadia, he made it with seven strings to
> > > > correspond to the number of Atlantides, since Maia, his mother, was of
> > > > their company. Later, when he had driven away the cattle of Apollo and
> > > > had been caught in the act, to win pardon more easily, at Apollo's
> > > > request he gave him permission to claim the invention of the lyre, and
> > > > received from him a certain staff as reward ... Apollo took the lyre,
> > > > and is said to have taught Orpheus on it, and after he himself had
> > > > invented the cithara, he gave the lyre to Orpheus." - Hyginus,
> > > > Astronomica 2.7
> > > >
> > > > "The clever device of the lyre, it is said, was invented by Hermes,
> > > > who constructed it of two horns and a crossbar and a tortoise-shell;
> > > > and he presented it first to Apollon and the Mousai, then to Amphion
> > > > of Thebes." - Philostratus the Elder, Imagines 1.10
> > > >
> > > > The lyre is one of the most ancient of musical instruments. For
> > > > example, in the royal city of Ur (circa 3000 BC) musicians played the
> > > > lyre for royalty, according to excavated artifacts.
> > > >
> > > > In Greek mythology, the lyre was invented by Hermes. When only a
> > > > child, he pulled a cow-gut across a tortoise shell, and thereby
> > > > created the lyre. Hermes gave this lyre to his half-brother Apollo
> > > > (both were fathered by Zeus). As the god of music, Apollo became
> > > > associated with the instrument.
> > > >
> > > > Orpheus was given the instrument by Apollo when only a child, and the
> > > > Muses taught him to use it. Even Nature herself would stop to listen,
> > > > enraptured by his music. When Eurydice, the wife of Orpheus, died
> > > > from a snake bite and was taken to the Underworld, Orpheus followed in
> > > > hopes of bringing her back. His playing convinced Hades to release
> > > > Eurydice, providing Orpheus didn't look back at her during the journey
> > > > home - but just as he emerged into the sunlight Orpheus turned and
> > > > gazed upon his wife, and lost her forever.
> > > >
> > > > There are several versions about the death of Orpheus. In the most
> > > > widespread version Dionysus invades Thrace, home of Orpheus, and the
> > > > female followers of Dionysus (the Maenads) tear Orpheus from limb to
> > > > limb. His head is thrown into the river Hebrus, where it floats to
> > > > Lesbos, singing the entire time. The lyre of Orpheus is also thrown
> > > > into the river, and it too floats to Lesbos, beached near the temple
> > > > of Apollo. Apollo then convinces Zeus that the instrument should
> > > > become a constellation. Zeus agrees, and places the lyre of Orpheus
> > > > between Hercules and Cygnus.
> > > >
> > > > Valete bene!
> > > >
> > > > Cato
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 82869 From: Cato Date: 2011-01-23
Subject: a.d. X Kal. Feb.
Cato omnibus in foro SPD

Hodiernus dies est ante diem X Kalendas Februarius; haec dies comitialis est.


"As regards the laws and institutions by which he made great progress
in both these directions, I do not think it fitting that I should
enter into all the details, not only because I fear the length of such
a discussion but also because I do not regard the recording of them as
necessary to a history intended for Greeks; but I shall give a summary
account of the principal measures, which are sufficient to reveal the
man's whole purpose, beginning with his regulations concerning the
worship of the gods. I should state, however, that all those rites
which he found established by Romulus, either in custom or in law, he
left untouched, looking upon them all as established in the best
possible manner. But whatever he thought had been overlooked by his
predecessor, he added, consecrating many precincts to those gods who
had hitherto received no honours, erecting many altars and temples,
instituting festivals in honour of each, and appointing priests to
have charge of their sanctuaries and rites, and enacting laws
concerning purifications, ceremonies, expiations and many other
observances and honours in greater number than are to be found in any
other city, either Greek or barbarian, even in those that have prided
themselves the most at one time or another upon their piety. He also
ordered that Romulus himself, as one who had shown a greatness beyond
mortal nature, should be honoured, under the name of Quirinus, by the
erection of a temple and by sacrifices throughout the year. For while
the Romans were yet in doubt whether divine providence or human
treachery had been the cause of his disappearance, a certain man,
named Julius, descended from Ascanius, who was a husbandman and of
such a blameless life that he would never have told an untruth for his
private advantage, arrived in the Forum and said that, as he was
coming in from the country, he saw Romulus departing from the city
fully armed and that, as he drew near to him, he heard him say these
words: 'Julius, announce to the Romans from me, that the genius to
whom I was allotted at my birth is conducting me to the gods, now that
I have finished my mortal life, and that I am Quirinus.' Numa, having
reduced his whole system of religious laws to writing, divided them
into eight parts, that being the number of the different classes of
religious ceremonies." - Dionysius of Halicarnassus, "Roman
Antiquities" 2.63


"Then she [Sekhmet] laughed with joy, and her laughter was like the
roar of a lioness hungry for the kill. Thinking that it was indeed
blood, she stooped and drank. Again and yet again she drank, laughing
with delight; and the strength of the beer mounted to her brain, so
that she could no longer slay. At last she came reeling back to where
Ra was waiting; that day she had not killed even a single man. Then
Ra said: 'You come in peace, sweet one.' And her name was changed to
Hathor, and her nature was changed also to the sweetness of love and
the strength of desire. And henceforth Hathor laid low men and women
only with the great power of love. But for ever after her priestesses
drank in her honour of the beer of Heliopolis coloured with the red
ochre of Elephantine when they celebrated her festival each New Year."
- from the Egyptian Book of The Dead

"The beauty of your face
Glitters when you rise
Oh come in peace.
One is drunk
At your beautiful face,
O Gold, Hathor." - 18th Dynasty Hymn to Hathor

In ancient Egypt, today was dedicated to the goddes Hathor. Other
names for Hathor are Het-Hert, Athyr and Hetheru. Her name appears to
mean "house of Horus", a reference to her role as a sky goddess, the
"house" denoting the heavens depicted as a great cow. (At the temple
of Queen Nefertari at Abu Simbel, Nefertari is shown as Hathor, and
her husband Ramses II is shown in one sanctuary receiving milk from
Hathor the cow.) Hathor was often regarded as the mother of the
Egyptian pharaoh, who styled himself the "son of Hathor". During the
Old Kingdom she assumed the properties of an earlier bovine goddess,
Bat. She is an ancient goddess and appears to have been mentioned as
early as the 2nd Dynasty. In early Egyptian mythology she was the
mother of the sky god Horus, but was later replaced in this capacity
by Isis. One of the tales of Hathor tells that she was originally a
goddess of destruction (Hathor-Sekhmet), but Hathor later became a
consort and/or protectress of Horus. She was depicted either as a cow
or in human form wearing a crown consisting of a sun disk held between
the horns of a cow.

Hathor was associated with erotic music and dancing, patron of sexual
love, the sky, the sun, the queen, music, dance and the arts, and the
Egyptian's cognate of the Romans' Venus, while the Greeks identified
her with Aphrodite. Egyptian women prayed to Hathor for assistance
during childbirth, and as a cow deity she was envisioned as suckling
infants. On the occasion of a birth in Egypt, seven Hathors (rather
like European fairy godmothers) would appear to "speak with one mouth"
and determine the child's fate. These goddesses were worshiped in
seven cities: Thebes, Heliopolis, Aphroditopolis, Sinai, Momemphis,
Herakleopolis, and Keset. They are linked to the Pleiades star cluster
in the constellation Taurus, known even today as the Seven Sisters. To
the Greeks, they were the seven daughters of Atlas.


Valete bene!

Cato
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 82870 From: Timothy or Stephen Gallagher Date: 2011-01-23
Subject: FW: [Explorator] explorator 13.40
fyi



To: explorator@yahoogroups.com
From: rogueclassicist@...
Date: Sun, 23 Jan 2011 09:48:39 -0500
Subject: [Explorator] explorator 13.40






================================================================
explorator 13.40 January 23, 2011
================================================================
Editor's note: Most urls should be active for at least eight
hours from the time of publication.

For your computer's protection, Explorator is sent in plain text
and NEVER has attachments. Be suspicious of any Explorator which
arrives otherwise!!!

================================================================
================================================================
Thanks to Arthur Shippee, Dave Sowdon, Dorothy Lobel King,
Donna Hurst, Carolyn Snively, Keely, Edward Rockstein,
Rick Heli, Cressida Ryan, Barbara Saylor Rodgers, Kurt Theis,
John McMahon, Barnea Selavan, Joseph Lauer, Mike Ruggeri,
Richard Campbell, Richard C. Griffiths, Magnus Fiskesj�
and Ross W. Sargent for headses upses this week (as always
hoping I have left no one out).

... a rather slow week ...

================================================================
EARLY HUMANS
================================================================
How Neanderthals hunted:

http://www.russia-ic.com/education_science/science/breakthrough/1261/

More on Neanderthal faces/noses:

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/science/science-news/8261609/Neanderthals-were-not-ugly-because-of-the-cold-new-research-finds.html
http://www.physorg.com/news/2011-01-neanderthal-cold.html
http://www.tehrantimes.com/index_View.asp?code=234273
http://blog.seattlepi.com/thebigblog/archives/236047.asp?from=blog_last3
================================================================
ANCIENT NEAR EAST AND EGYPT
================================================================
Somewhat vague item on 'pharaonic coffins' being sound in Abu Yasseen
village:

http://www.almasryalyoum.com/en/news/sewage-workers-find-3-pharaonic-coffins

OpEd on plans to close Tut's tomb:

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/africaandindianocean/egypt/8267436/Why-Tutankhamun-is-history-now.html

... and more reports on its impending closure:

http://www.guardian.co.uk/culture/2011/jan/17/tutankhamun-tomb-to-close

... but they're planning to keep it open for a while longer, it seems:

http://news.discovery.com/archaeology/king-tuts-tomb-to-remain-open.html
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/41181247/ns/technology_and_science-science/

... while Tut's mask is being readied to be transferred to its new home:

http://search.japantimes.co.jp/cgi-bin/nn20110121a7.html
http://mdn.mainichi.jp/arts/news/20110120p2g00m0et074000c.html

... and folks are arguing about his ancestry:

http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn20014-royal-rumpus-over-king-tutankhamuns-ancestry.html

A kiln from southern Iran:

http://www.presstv.ir/detail/161444.html

On the antiquity of human presence in Syria (some strange dates in this
one):

http://www.english.globalarabnetwork.com/201101178685/Travel/archaeologists-human-settlement-in-syria-dates-back-to-one-million-years.html

A pile of metal artifacts (ca 1800 years old) from Bazgir Tepe (Iran):

http://www.mehrnews.com/en/newsdetail.aspx?NewsID=1233637

Feature on efforts to protect the mosaics in 'Hisham's Palace':

http://www.dailystar.com.lb/article.asp?edition_id=10&categ_id=4&article_id=123918
http://www.timesofmalta.com/articles/view/20110123/business/drive-to-save-stunning-mosaics-in-west-bank

...related:

http://www.maannews.net/eng/ViewDetails.aspx?ID=351275

Interesting 'fragment of the month' from Cambridge University Library:

http://www.lib.cam.ac.uk/Taylor-Schechter/fotm/january-2011/index.html

... and a feature on a couple of baby mummies in the ROM's collection:

http://www.thestar.com/news/article/924816--royal-ontario-museum-s-secret-mummy-babies-revealed

A feature on the James Ossuary, now that the trial's over or nearly so:

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/robert-eisenman/the-james-ossuary-and-its_b_810517.html

A feature on Eilat Mazar's work:

http://www.thetrumpet.com/index.php?q=7869.6484.0.0

Interview with Ami Mazar:

http://www.israelnationalnews.com/Radio/News.aspx/2826

Another twist in that Noah's Ark 'confession':

http://michaelsheiser.com/PaleoBabble/2011/01/noahs-ark-he-said-she-said-hoax-confession-now-denied/

Egyptology News Blog:

http://egyptology.blogspot.com/

Egyptology Blog:

http://www.egyptologyblog.co.uk/

Dr Leen Ritmeyer's Blog:

http://blog.ritmeyer.com/

Paleojudaica:

http://paleojudaica.blogspot.com/

Persepolis Fortification Archives:

http://persepolistablets.blogspot.com/

Archaeologist at Large:

http://spaces.msn.com/members/ArchaeologyinEgypt/
================================================================
ANCIENT GREECE AND ROME (AND CLASSICS)
================================================================
This week's silliness involved claims of the finding of Caligula's tomb (or
at least a
statue of him):

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2011/jan/17/caligula-tomb-found-police-statue
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1348356/Caligulas-resting-place-finally--police-arrest-tomb-raider-trying-steal-statue.html
http://www.dailyindia.com/show/419794.php

... the tomb side was quickly poopooed by Mary Beard (and me)

http://timesonline.typepad.com/dons_life/2011/01/this-isnt-caligulas-tomb.html
http://rogueclassicism.com/2011/01/18/caligula-tomb-silliness/
http://rogueclassicism.com/2011/01/22/purported-tomb-of-caligula-followup/

... and some news organizations did pick up on that:

http://cosmiclog.msnbc.msn.com/_news/2011/01/18/5870712-statue-sparks-talk-of-caligulas-tomb
http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-503543_162-20028786-503543.html
http://www.aolnews.com/2011/01/18/controversy-over-alleged-discovery-of-caligulas-lost-tomb/
http://www.theatlanticwire.com/features/view/feature/No-You-Have-Not-Found-Caligulas-Tomb-3000

... and others focussed on potential lost villas:

http://news.discovery.com/archaeology/caligula-statue-hints-at-lavish-villa.html

A Roman bathhouse from Bosra (Syria):

http://www.english.globalarabnetwork.com/201101168665/Travel/roman-bathhouses-in-southern-syria-new-archaeological-discoveries.html

Ancient Transylvanians (a.k.a. the Dacians) were pretty well off (perhaps):

http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2011/01/110113-transylvanians-gold-bracelets-treasure-dracula-vampires-science/

This one's been in the works for a while ... a major shoe manufacturer is
going to fund restoration of the Colosseum:

http://www.straitstimes.com/BreakingNews/World/Story/STIStory_627155.html
http://www.foxnews.com/world/2011/01/21/tods-founder-restore-romes-colosseum-639295544/
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/01/21/tods-founder-to-restore-r_n_812444.html
http://www.bbc.co.uk/go/rss/int/news/-/news/world-europe-12256813
http://www.usatoday.com/news/world/2011-01-21-colosseum_N.htm
http://artsbeat.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/01/22/tods-to-help-fund-colosseum-restoration/
http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5h5EKJITFly9omNiw-XTWziHHD-Bw?docId=b51dff06f7814c2fbf8e46b2e3ea0b34
http://af.reuters.com/article/cameroonNews/idAFLDE70K1T920110121

Repurposing a Roman urn:

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-12258359
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1349259/Electric-lamp-sells-445k-revealed-2k-year-old-relic.html

Evidence of a Roman vicus/shanty town in Teesdale:

http://www.teesdalemercury.co.uk/teesdale-news/story,3127.html

How Romans made pottery in Britain:

http://www.physorg.com/news/2011-01-romans-pottery-britain.html
http://news.stanford.edu/news/2011/january/british-pottery-project-012011.html

Interesting series of essays on Plato's laws by Victor Nuovo:

http://www.addisonindependent.com/category/tags/plato-2010

Knox College is looking at an ancient Roman village:

http://www.knox.edu/News-and-Events/News-Archive/Knox-Students-and-Faculty-Research-Ancient-Roman-Village.html

ClassCon in the Chilcot enquiry:

http://blogs.news.sky.com/editorsblog/Post:31b95f7b-8a1d-4097-96ab-87a6136715c7

cf: http://rogueclassicism.com/2011/01/20/latin-intelligence/

What Philip Freeman has been up to:

http://www.luther.edu/headlines/?story_id=314338

... and here's another review of his Alexander book:

http://www.boston.com/ae/books/articles/2011/01/18/alexander_the_great_bio_gives_a_human_look_to_a_classic_conqueror/

Review (I think) of Joan Mertens, *How to Read Greek Vases*:

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704590704576092403407821420.html?mod=googlenews_wsj#articleTabs%3Darticle

Another review of Stacy Schiff:

http://www.guardian.co.uk/books/2011/jan/22/cleopatra-life-stacy-schiff-review

Excerpt from Gary Corby's *Pericles Commission*:

http://www.heraldsun.com.au/news/sunday-heraldsun/sunday-read-the-pericles-commission/story-e6frf92f-1225988428444

Latest reviews from Scholia:

http://www.classics.ukzn.ac.za/reviews/

Latest reviews from BMCR:

http://bmcr.brynmawr.edu/recent.html

Visit our blog:

http://rogueclassicism.com/
================================================================
EUROPE AND THE UK (+ Ireland)
================================================================
Pondering bog bodies:

http://www.usatoday.com/tech/science/columnist/vergano/2011-01-16-bog-bodies_N.htm

Haven't had a facial reconstruction in a while ... here's some third
millennium folk from the
Ural Mountains region:

http://www.russia-ic.com/news/show/11421/

Reviewish sort of thing of *Viking DNA: The Wirral and West Lancashire
Project*:

http://www.physorg.com/news/2011-01-dna-viking-north-west.html

Archaeology in Europe Blog:

http://archaeology-in-europe.blogspot.com/

================================================================
ASIA AND THE SOUTH PACIFIC
================================================================
Stones destined for Edo castle found during an underwater survey:

http://www.yomiuri.co.jp/dy/national/T110117003127.htm

A recently-found megalith site in South Sumatra has been deemed 'sacred':

http://www.archnews.co.uk/world-archaeology/asia-archaeology/4830-megalithic-site-together-with-a-mass-grave-now-declared-sacred.html

Paper on traditional textiles of southwest Chinese Minorities:

http://scholarworks.iu.edu/journals/index.php/mar/article/view/889/1028

East Asian Archaeology:

http://eastasiablog.wordpress.com/2010/05/20/east-asian-archaeology-cultural-heritage-%E2%80%93-2052010/

Southeast Asian Archaeology Newsblog:

http://www.southeastasianarchaeology.com/

New Zealand Archaeology eNews:

http://www.nzarchaeology.org/netsubnews.htm
================================================================
NORTH AMERICA
================================================================
A potential site with a Colonial fort in St Augustine:

http://www.news4jax.com/news/26528165/detail.html
http://jacksonville.com/news/metro/2011-01-16/story/st-augustines-city-archaeologist-believes-hes-found-old-fort
http://staugustine.com/news/local-news/2011-01-15/find-could-be-1500s
http://www.miamiherald.com/2011/01/18/2020982/dig-could-reveal-colonial-fort.html

... and just down the road from me, archaeology is holding up community
centre
construction:

http://www.thespec.com/community/article/474582--archaeology-delays-stoney-creek-centre

Native American artifacts from various periods turn up during a bridge
replacement project
in New Jersey:

http://www.nativetimes.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=4831:nj-bridge-dig-turns-up-native-american-artifacts&catid=43&Itemid=19

Project to see how humans affected landscapes prior to European contact:

http://www.physorg.com/news/2011-01-footprints-ancient-people-affect-modern.html

Plans for an archaeological park at a colonial-era mill site called Petty's
Run (NJ) aren't going
to happen, apparently:

http://www.mercerspace.com/article/86962-archaeology+park+plans+ruined

Interesting item on the restoration of a 1770 map of New York City:

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/01/17/nyregion/17map.html

More on the remains of the oldest-known domesticated dog
in North America:

http://www.artdaily.org/index.asp?int_sec=2&int_new=44306
http://www.startribune.com/nation/114243479.html
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/01/19/9400-year-old-dog-found_n_810846.html
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20110119/ap_on_sc/us_early_dog
http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/2011/01/19/us/AP-US-Early-Dog.html
http://www.therecord.com/news/article/475878--ancient-dog-was-apparently-tasty
http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Latest-News-Wires/2011/0119/9-400-year-old-dog-found-earliest-found-in-Americas?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+feeds%2Fusa+%28Christian+Science+Monitor+%7C+USA%29
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-1348546/Bone-fragment-confirms-dogs-bred-food-9-400-years-ago.html

More on that purported Blackbeard's sword find:

http://www.sys-con.com/node/1680223
http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/archaeologists-discover-famous-pirates-treasure-off-north-carolinas-coast-114123019.html
http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2011/01/sword-belonging-to-infamous-pirate-blackbeard-discovered-in-shipwreck/

More on the USS Revenge:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2011/01/18/AR2011011802806.html

More on the PeeDee:

http://www.dailygamecock.com/news/item/223-usc-archaeologists-find-civil-war-boat

Review of Mosette Broderick, *Triumvirate*:

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/01/16/nyregion/16book.html

================================================================
CENTRAL AND SOUTH AMERICA
================================================================
Some new geoglyphs found on the Nazca Plateau:

http://www.andina.com.pe/Ingles/Noticia.aspx?id=UiWxbbOu2rs=
http://japantoday.com/category/national/view/japanese-team-finds-2-new-geoglyphs-on-perus-nazca-plateau

A 1200 years b.p. Sican culture royal tomb from Lambayaque (Peru):

http://www.laht.com/article.asp?ArticleId=384541&CategoryId=14095
http://www.foxnews.com/scitech/2011/01/20/year-old-royal-tomb-uncovered-peru/
http://uk.news.yahoo.com/18/20110120/tsc-tomb-of-pre-columbian-noble-discover-c2ff8aa.html

Hype for USCB's plans to work at El Pilar:

http://www.thedailysound.com/News/012211-UCSB-MAYA-MEXICO

Three Clovis points from Mexico:

http://www.artdaily.org/index.asp?int_sec=2&int_new=44358
http://www.inah.gob.mx/index.php/boletines/14-hallazgos/4828-hallazgo-revelaria-contacto-del-hombre-con-gonfoterio-en-norteamerica

Studying 17th-century drawings of prehispanic sites around Mexico:

http://www.artdaily.org/index.asp?int_sec=2&int_new=44253

Plans to investigate legends of a Maya city at Quetzalenango (Guatemala):

http://www.prensalibre.com/noticias/Excavaciones-podrian-validar-leyenda-altense_0_409759039.html

Honours for Pilar Luna:

http://www.artdaily.org/index.asp?int_sec=2&int_new=44326

A Swiss collector has returned four pre-Columbian mummies to Chile:

http://www.boston.com/news/science/articles/2011/01/20/swiss_collector_returns_4_ancient_mummies_to_chile
http://www.physorg.com/news/2011-01-swiss-collector-ancient-mummies-chile.html
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20110120/ap_on_sc/eu_switzerland_chilean_mummies

Interesting blog post on axial symmetry at Uxmal:

http://blog.classicist.org/?p=2046

Mike Ruggeri's Ancient Americas Breaking News:

http://web.mac.com/michaelruggeri

Ancient MesoAmerica News:

http://ancient-mesoamerica-news-updates.blogspot.com/
================================================================
OTHER ITEMS OF INTEREST
================================================================
More on tree rings and the rise and fall of empires:

http://www.tgdaily.com/general-sciences-features/53569-tree-rings-offer-glimpse-into-ancient-rome
http://www.dispatch.com/live/content/science/stories/2011/01/16/climate-had-role-in-changing-cultures.html
http://green.yahoo.com/news/afp/20110114/sc_afp/climatescienceuseurope.html
http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=133143758&ps=cprs
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-1348127/climate-change-blame-fall-Roman-Empire-say-scientists.html
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-1347917/Was-climate-change-responsible-rise-fall-Roman-Empire.html

... and now they're getting monk's diaries in the climate-change research:

http://uk.news.yahoo.com/21/20110117/tsc-monk-s-diaries-help-weather-study-4b158bc.html

Pondering Iron-Age beer (I think we had this before):

http://news.discovery.com/archaeology/iron-age-beer-celtic-brewery-110118.html
http://www.physorg.com/news/2011-01-brewery-bc-reveals-secrets.html
http://www.upi.com/Science_News/2011/01/17/Iron-Age-beer-making-analyzed-at-dig/UPI-30671295321286/

... and a follow-up of sorts (I think) to that shipwreck-champagne discovery
last summer:

http://www.google.com/hostednews/afp/article/ALeqM5hpYud37EEIr7VxcPCVPlEFbhzj7w?docId=CNG.9d98f5078c22208156a5fddb2195a4d0.131

Someone doesn't like all those things they're saying about Gauguin:

http://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/art/news/gauguins-british-relative-disputes-artists-notoriety-2191988.html

A history (of sorts) of vaccinations:

https://mail.google.com/mail/#label/4explorator/12daa91d12a5755f

Interesting story about a 100-year-old French house that is now open to the
public:

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-12214885

Revisionism about Galileo and the Church:

http://www.physorg.com/news/2011-01-revelations-galileo-bruno-aliens.html

Interesting use of 'granite stitching' to help preserve a temple in India:

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-12127154

Review of James Miller, *Examined Lives*:

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/01/23/books/review/Bakewell-t.html
================================================================
TOURISTY THINGS
================================================================
Tarquinia:

http://www.time.com/time/travel/article/0,31542,2043335,00.html
================================================================
BLOGS
================================================================
About.com Archaeology:

http://archaeology.about.com/

Archaeology Briefs:

http://archaeologybriefs.blogspot.com/

Taygete Atlantis excavations blogs aggregator:

http://planet.atlantides.org/taygete/

Time Machine:

http://heatherpringle.wordpress.com/

================================================================
CRIME BEAT
================================================================
Boy George returned an icon he owned to Cyprus when he learned it had
previously been stolen:

http://www.artdaily.org/index.asp?int_sec=2&int_new=44362
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1348955/Boy-George-returns-stolen-picture-Christ-Cyprus.html#ixzz1BfBh8Kk2
http://www.cyprus-mail.com/church/archbishop-moved-boy-george-gesture/20110121

Another bust in Thessaloniki:

http://www.ana-mpa.gr/anaweb/user/showplain?maindoc=9489265&maindocimg=9489887&service=96&showLink=true

The US returned some stolen Degas (Degases?) to France:

http://www.artdaily.org/index.asp?int_sec=2&int_new=44369

Looting Matters:

http://lootingmatters.blogspot.com/

Illicit Cultural Property:

http://illicit-cultural-property.blogspot.com/
================================================================
NUMISMATICA
================================================================
An exhibition of Roman coins found in India:

http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/chennai/A-glimpse-of-rare-Roman-coins-at-Museum/articleshow/7315542.cms

A rare coin collection has been returned to its rightful heir:

http://www.tctimes.com/articles/2011/01/16/living/doc4d30fd1c27426019494826.txt

More on that coin of Antiochus:

http://earthsky.org/human-world/ancient-greek-coin-might-mark-blotting-out-of-jupiter-by-the-moon

Latest eSylum newsletter:

http://www.coinbooks.org/club_nbs_esylum_v14n03.html

Ancient Coin Collecting:

http://ancientcoincollecting.blogspot.com/

Ancient Coins:

http://classicalcoins.blogspot.com/

Coin Link:

http://www.coinlink.com/News/
================================================================
EXHIBITIONS, AUCTIONS, AND MUSEUM-RELATED
================================================================
Lewis Chessmen:

http://www.pressandjournal.co.uk/Article.aspx/2102326

Vatican Treasures:

http://www.sun-sentinel.com/fl-vatican-exhibit-012011-20110119,0,5303531.story

Vatican Manuscripts:

http://www.artdaily.org/index.asp?int_sec=2&int_new=44379

The Diary:

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/01/22/arts/design/22diary.html

The Story of Francis Buckley:

http://www.ancientdigger.com/2011/01/saddleworths-archaeology-collection-on.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+TheAncientDigger+%28The+Ancient+Digger%29

Lod Mosaic:

http://newyork.cbslocal.com/2011/01/16/eye-on-new-york-lod-mosaic/

All sorts of antiques fairs etc. going on in New York right now:

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/01/21/arts/design/21fairs.html

A History of the World (BM)

http://www.bbc.co.uk/ahistoryoftheworld/explorerflash/

================================================================
PERFORMANCES AND THEATRE-RELATED
================================================================
The Odyssey:

http://www.startribune.com/entertainment/onstage/114292534.html?elr=KArksD:aDyaEP:kD:aUg:oaEQDUiD3aPc:_Yyc:aULPQL7PQLanchO7DiUr

Cymbeline:

http://theater.nytimes.com/2011/01/18/theater/18cymbeline.html

Interesting 'Cultural Olympiad' plan for the Globe Theatre:

http://artsbeat.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/01/21/shakespeares-globe-theater-to-present-the-bards-canon-in-38-languages/

The 'top ten composers' series continues with Verdi and Wagner:

http://artsbeat.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/01/17/top-10-composers-hailing-operas-shakespeare-and-its-proust
================================================================
OBITUARIES
================================================================
Karl Kilinski:

http://www.legacy.com/obituaries/dallasmorningnews/obituary.aspx?n=karl-kilinski&pid=147666917
================================================================
HUMOUR
================================================================
The Trojan ...

http://comics.com/free_range/2011-01-16/
================================================================
PODCASTS
================================================================
Latest Archaeo News podcast:

http://www.pasthorizons.com/index.php/archives/01/2011/archaeo-news-podcast-184

The Book and the Spade:

http://www.radioscribe.com/bknspade.htm

The Dig:

http://www.thedigradio.com/

Stone Pages Archaeology News:

http://news.stonepages.com/

Archaeologica Audio News:

http://www.archaeologychannel.org/AudioNews.asp

Naked Archaeology Podcast:

http://www.thenakedscientists.com/HTML/podcasts/archaeology/
================================================================
EXPLORATOR is a weekly newsletter representing the fruits of
the labours of 'media research division' of The Atrium. Various
on-line news and magazine sources are scoured for news of the
ancient world (broadly construed: practically anything relating
to archaeology or history prior to about 1700 or so is fair
game) and every Sunday they are delivered to your mailbox free of
charge!
================================================================
Useful Addresses
================================================================
Past issues of Explorator are available on the web via our
Yahoo site:

http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/Explorator/

To subscribe to Explorator, send a blank email message to:

Explorator-subscribe@yahoogroups.com

To unsubscribe, send a blank email message to:

Explorator-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

To send a 'heads up' to the editor or contact him for other
reasons:

rogueclassicist@...
================================================================
Explorator is Copyright (c) 2011 David Meadows. Feel free to
distribute these listings via email to your pals, students,
teachers, etc., but please include this copyright notice. These
links are not to be posted to any website by any means (whether
by direct posting or snagging from a usenet group or some other
email source) without my express written permission. I think it
is only right that I be made aware of public fora which are
making use of content gathered in Explorator. Thanks!
================================================================
e

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]





[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 82871 From: Cato Date: 2011-01-24
Subject: a.d. IX Kal. Feb.
Cato omnibus in foro SPD

Hodiernus dies est ante diem IX Kalendas Februarius; haec dies comitialis est.


"The first division of religious rites he assigned to the thirty
curiones, who, as I have stated, perform the public sacrifices for the
curiae. The second, to those called by the Greeks stephanephoroi or
'wearers of the crown' and by the Romans flamines; they are given this
name from their wearing caps and fillets, called 'flama', which they
continue to wear even to this day. The third, to the commanders of
the celeres, who, as I have stated, were appointed to be the
body-guards of the kings and fought both as cavalry and infantry; for
these also performed certain specified rites. The fourth, to those
who interpret the signs sent by the gods and determine what they
portend both to private persons and to the public; these, from one
branch of the speculations belonging to their art, the Romans call
augurs, and we should call them oionopoloi or 'soothsayers by means of
birds'; they are skilled in all sorts of divination in use among the
Romans, whether founded on signs appearing in the heavens, in mid-air
or on the earth. The fifth he assigned to the virgins who are the
guardians of the sacred fire and who are called Vestals by the Romans,
after the goddess whom they serve, he himself having been the first to
build a temple at Rome to Vesta and to appoint virgins to be her
priestesses. But concerning them it is necessary to make a few
statements that are most essential, since the subject requires it; for
there are problems that have been thought worthy of investigation by
many Roman historians in connexion with this topic and those authors
who have not diligently examined into the causes of these matters have
published rather worthless accounts.

At any rate, as regards the building of the temple of Vesta, some
ascribe it to Romulus, looking upon it as an inconceivable thing that,
when a city was being founded by a man skilled in divination, a public
hearth should not have been erected first of all, particularly since
the founder had been brought up at Alba, where the temple of this
goddess had been established from ancient times, and since his mother
had been her priestess. And recognizing two classes of religious
ceremonies — the one public and common to all the citizens, and the
other private and confined to particular families — they declare that
on both these grounds Romulus was under every obligation to worship
this goddess. For they say that nothing is more necessary for men
than a public hearth, and that nothing more nearly concerned Romulus,
in view of his descent, since his ancestors had brought the sacred
rites of this goddess from Ilium and his mother had been her
priestess. Those, then, who for these reasons ascribe the building of
the temple to Romulus rather than to Numa seem to be right, in so far
as the general principle is concerned that, when a city was being
founded, it was necessary for a hearth to be established first of all,
particularly by a man who was not unskilled in matters of religion;
but of the details relating to the building of the present temple and
to the virgins who are in the service of the goddess they seem to have
been ignorant. For, in the first place, it was not Romulus who
consecrated to the goddess this place where the sacred fire is
preserved (a strong proof of this is that it is outside of what they
call Roma Quadrata, which he surrounded with a wall, whereas all men
place the shrine of the public hearth in the best part of a city and
nobody outside of the walls); and, in the second place, he did not
appoint the service of the goddess to be performed by virgins, being
mindful, I believe, of the experience that had befallen his mother,
who while she was serving the goddess lost her virginity; for he
doubtless felt that the remembrance of his domestic misfortunes would
make it impossible for him to punish according to the traditional laws
any of the priestesses he should find to have been violated. For this
reason, therefore, he did not build a common temple of Vesta nor did
he appoint virgins to be her priestesses; but having erected a hearth
in each of the thirty curiae on which the members sacrificed, he
appointed the chiefs of the curiae to be the priests of those hearths,
therein imitating the customs of the Greeks that are still observed in
the most ancient cities. At any rate, what are called prytaneia among
them are temples of Hestia, and are served by the chief magistrates of
the cities." - Dionysius of Halicarnassus 2.64-65


"On the ninth day before the Kalends of February at about the seventh
hour he hesitated whether or not to get up for luncheon, since his
stomach was still disordered from excess of food on the day before,
but at length he came out at the persuasion of his friends. In the
covered passage through which he had to pass, some boys of good birth,
who had been summoned from Asia to appear on the stage, were
rehearsing their parts, and he stopped to watch and encourage them;
and had not the leader of the troop complained that he had a chill, he
would have returned and had the performance given at once. From this
point there are two versions of the story: some say that as he was
talking with the boys, Chaerea came up behind, and gave him a deep cut
in the neck, having first cried, 'Take that,' and that then the
tribune Cornelius Sabinus, who was the other conspirator and faced
Gaius, stabbed him in the breast. Others say that Sabinus, after
getting rid of the crowd through centurions who were in the plot,
asked for the watchword, as soldiers do; and that when Gaius gave him
'Jupiter,' he cried 'So be it,' and as Gaius looked around, he split
his jawbone with a blow of his sword. As he lay upon the ground and
with writhing limbs called out that he still lived, the others
dispatched him with thirty wounds; for the general signal was 'Strike
again.' Some even thrust their swords through his privates. At the
beginning of the disturbance his bearers ran to his aid with their
poles, and presently the Germans of his body-guard, and they slew
several of his assassins, as well as some inoffensive senators." -
Suetonius, Lives of the Caesars, "Gaius" LVIII

"His surname Caligula he derived from a joke of the troops, because he
was brought up in their midst in the dress of a common soldier. To
what extent besides he won their love and devotion by being reared in
fellowship with them is especially evident from the fact that when
they threatened mutiny after the death of Augustus and were ready for
any act of madness, the mere sight of Gaius unquestionably calmed
them. For they did not become quiet until they saw that he was being
spirited away because of the danger from their outbreak and taken for
protection to the nearest town. Then at last they became contrite, and
laying hold of the carriage and stopping it, begged to be spared the
disgrace which was being put upon them." - Suetonius, Lives of the
Caesars, "Gaius" IX


On this day in AD 41 the emperor Gaius Caesar Augustus Germanicus,
known as "Caligula", was murdered by his own Praetorian Guard, led by
Cassius Chaerea. He was 29 years old, and had reigned for just under
4 years. His brutality and fits of insanity are legendary; he did
not, however, make his horse Incitatus a senator. He did consider
making him a consul.


Valete bene!

Cato
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 82872 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2011-01-25
Subject: Manú Aví tí: information on Reginald Foster's summer Latin progr
A. Tullia Scholastica quiritibus bonae voluntatis, praesertim
Latineloquentibus, S.P.D.

Avitus provided the information below on one of our course sites. As
several of you are aware, we teach Latin language courses by two different
methods, traditional and assimilation, and have reinstated the Rudímenta
Latína course, which deals with the history of Latin. Fewer know that we
also offer field courses in conjunction with others. The information below
is intended for highly-competent Latinists wishing to take such a field
course; another for more general study will follow. The provider, Reginald
Foster, is a well-known senior Latinist affiliated with a place where Latin
is highly valued...the Vatican.



===============================================

NON ENIM TAM PRAECLARVM EST SCIRE LATINE QVAM TVRPE NESCIRE
NEQVE TAM ID

ORATORIS BONI QVAM CIVIS ROMANI PROPRIVM VIDETVR

[ Marcus Tullius Cicero : Brutus 37, 140 ]

____________________________________________________________________________
____________________________

³A E S T I V A M I L V A V C H I A E L A T I N I T A S ³
=========================================================
(SUMMER LATIN IN MILWAUKEE, WISCONSIN, U.S.A.)


§ Not any kind of rushed immersion into Latin nor a high-pressure tour
of so-called ŒLatin Grammar¹, but rather: a slow and thorough, real and
immediate experience of the whole Latin language in all its historical
periods and types of literature from the past 2300 years ­ through a total,
daily, conscious involvement in precise comprehension of original texts and
unprepared first-sight Latin readings, in personal composition and
extemporaneous Latin Conversation, in discussions about classroom pedagogy
and teaching methods: (all joined with a solid reliving of the Roman world
by means of simple, inexpensive outings and literary trips with the aid of
real, pertinent Latin sources and writings.)

§ Projected and provided only for very well trained Latin teachers
and/or fully educated high-level advanced Latin scholars [at least 21 years
of age ­ to be proven by official documentation] who have decided to develop
further and are determined to advance in Latin mastery and competence
through serious, joyful, constant application. Consequently: = The summer
program is for sure not advisable nor available to inexperienced beginners,
to the first-level students, to fresh grammar-victims, even with the best of
intentions. ((N.B. A preliminary written exercise and examination to be
completed privately and returned quickly by all candidates will show to the
people themselves and to the organizer each one¹s preparation and readiness,
or not. ))

§ A minimum of two encounters of 90 minutes, every day according to a
separately printed outline of class material, six days a week, for eight
complete weeks, from beginning on Monday June 6th, until the conclusion on
Saturday July 30st, of the year 2011. In two sections or on two levels
which occupy, at a slower pace: Œ iuniores¹ = rusty scholars, antiquated
Latinists and first-time Roman summer-schoolers, at a faster speed:
Œseniores¹ = better equipped, tested Latin veterans or perhaps former
Foster subjects: to whom upon request a document can be given after the
proper completion of each one¹s complete course. Except for very special
cases, no person may take any Summer Experience more than twice nor attend
two years in succession: and this is simply in order to avoid many
disgusting repetitions and inevitable boredom.

§ Required, personal undertakings and assignments outside of class
times ­ both in writing and by memory: enriched by spontaneous, casual,
evening meetings Œsub arboribus¹ in nearby gardens with various Latin
readings and free Latin conversations, and also complemented with economical
Latin excursions to meaningful places in and around the area.

§ Therefore: even if guests and observers, relatives and friends of the
approved participants are always welcome to share the summer Latin event
together and the outside activities, nevertheless officially inscribed
members who arbitrarily drift in and out, who inconsistently appear and
disappear because of some private cause, some outside rule of observance or
of the weather, who are on a summer vacation with Latin thrown in or a
honeymoon, who neglect their weekly ³Ludi Aestivi², who do not normally
interact with the others in the Œexperience¹ are neither tolerated nor
recognized, and will be told publicly to abandon summer Latin for the
greater consolation and encouragement of the remaining faithful associates.


(over)
§ While lodging arrangements in the Midwest and surrounding area for
the time of the summer school are the exclusive responsibility of the
partakers themselves confidently entrusted to their ingenuity and good luck,
especially by employing the many offerings on the Internet, all other
classroom materials and the instruction itself are supplied without any
financial obligations or strings attached by Reginald Foster, near the
address provided below, in keeping with the spirit, conditions and
principles indicated above; accordingly ­ without any fixed fees or tuitions
at all, even though spontaneous and completely anonymous contributions to
the Œgood Latin cause¹ are certainly presumed and most gratefully received.

§ Anybody interested in this adventure and undertaking can contact ­
for answers and information:




Reginald Thomas Foster


3553 South 41st St Apt. 403

Milwaukee, Wisconsin ­ 53221-5744
U. S. A

=========================================


Valete.





[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 82873 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2011-01-25
Subject: Information on Reginald Foster's general summer Latin programs
 
A. Tullia Scholastica quiritibus tironibus bonae voluntatis S.P.D.

    Avítus reappeared on our faculty list the other day, and posted the item
copied below (and one other item which preceded) on one of our course sites.
 As some of you are aware, we offer Latin language classes taught by both
assimilation and traditional methods as well as the introductory Rudímenta
Latína one, which deals with the history of Latin.  Fewer are aware,
however, that we also offer field courses in Latin immersion (conducted by
others) and the Auctórés Latíní one conducted by Reginald Foster, a senior
Latinist associated with the Vatican.  Information on the latter is below;
an English text on the more advanced course has preceded this. This
information is being crossposted to several lists as not all who might be
interested are on all of them; I apologize for any duplications.

Valéte.  

==============================

    UNIVERSUM   LATINITATIS   CURRICULUM


A.    Annua Exercitatio Communis

·     Milvauchiae a mense Octobri ad Maium
·     in triginta quinque congressibus gratuitis
·     quinque ³Experientiarum² sive graduum ab imo ad summum
·     feriis opportunis interpositis
·     pluribus cum lectionibus Œad libitum¹.

[ATS: This is a more general course, from October to May in Milwaukee,
in 35 free meetings in five levels, with holidays in between and lessons /
readings ad libitum].
 
 
 
B.     Aestiva Eruditio Altior
 
·     ibidem mensibus Iunio et Iulio
·     sexies in hebdomada gratis
·     duorum ordinum superioris institutionis: Iuniorum et Seniorum
·     itineribus litterariis propositis
·     liberis cum sessionibus Œsub arboribus¹.

[ATS: This is a more concentrated summer course six times a week, also
free, divided into two levels, senior and junior, with literary excursions
and outdoor sessions].
 
 
PETE  SCRIBE  QUAERE :
 
Reginald Thomas Foster
3553 South 41st Street, Apt #403
Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53221-5744
U.S.A
 
 
414-755-9686







[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 82874 From: Cato Date: 2011-01-25
Subject: a.d. VIII Kal. Feb.
Cato omnibus in foro SPD

Hodiernus dies est ante diem VIII Kalendas Februarias; haec dies comitialis est.

INDUSTRY IN THE REPUBLIC AND EMPIRE

Latium, the area around Rome, was initially an agricultural region.
But the early influence of the Etruscans and the Greek colonies in
Italy had inspired the creation of a local industry. Pottery was
introduced from Campania and the art of bronze-casting from Etruria.

Rome's conquest of Italy didn't stifle industry but encourage it. It
may well have been that Roman law and order, as well as the political
stability provided the reasons for trade to thrive. Also Rome never
used its authority to insist on goods from the capital be given any
preference. Its dependent territories didn't buy goods from Rome due
to force, but because they chose to do so. Gradually, as Rome
extended its power and empire with conquests, the increasing
population and demands for luxuries, as well as the construction of
large public works caused many industries to flourish; but Rome,
although important as an industrial center, was largely a city which
consumed goods, rather than producing them. Imports exceeded exports
by far (with the exception of bronze goods which were exported all
over the empire).

As the unrivalled metropolis, Rome achieved an absolute lead in in the
production of luxury goods, particularly in articles of precious
metals, such as jewelry and engraved cups. Foreign craftsmen who
migrated to the city, mostly Greeks, created refined masterpieces in
their workshops. Meanwhile the building trade naturally became far
more developed in Rome than anywhere else.

Industry though flourished elsewhere. Genoa, Ostia and Ravenna were
Rome's major harbors, providing her with warships as well as
benefiting from the rise in shipping trade. Como, Sulmona, Salerno
and Puteoli were centres of the iron industry which received great
quantities of iron ore from the minors of Elba. Campania grew rich
not only on its fertile soil which grew, among other things, some of
the best wines, but also for its industrial products. Bronzes from
Capua, terra cotta ware from Puteoli, Cumae and Ischia, glass form
Cumae, Sorento and Pompeii, liquamen from Pompeii. Apulia produced the
finest wool. Northern Italy supplied bronze articles from Bergamo,
bricks from Modena and amphorae from Pola. So, too, did it boast a
famous woollen industry at Istria, Padua and Parma and dye works at
Aquileia. Aquileia was further also known for its cloth making and
glass industry, as well as for its workshops for amber (sucinum) which
was imported from as far away as the Baltic in northern Europe.

Industry benefited much from the existence of a large, almost
limitless empire. Technical advances were helped by the unity of the
empire which much helped the spread of new ideas. But so too, the
policing of the seas and the construction of the famous Roman roads
aided trade into the most distant countries. And all the while the
vast city of Rome and its massive standing army provided vast a demand
for goods.

The rich eastern provinces sent to Rome rare and exotic goods,
fashioned in their factories and workshops from materials from yet
more far flung regions of the world. Silk from China, emeralds from
Scythia, perfumes from Arabia, glass and papyrus from Egypt (Egypt was
the oldest glass-producing country if the Mediterranean and hence had
vast expertise in the matter, producing by far the finest glassware of
the day). In the western and northern provinces, too, industries were
greatly developed, entering into competition with Italian producers.
Spain already in the days of empire should produce some of the finest
steel, but also provided fine wool and the highest quality liquamen.
Gaul became famous for its bronze work, shoes, and woollen industry.
Noricum produced the finest weapons, the Rhine valley the best
earthenware.



"Having spent the greater part of his life under these and like
circumstances, he became emperor in his fiftieth year by a remarkable
freak of fortune. When the assassins of Gaius shut out the crowd under
pretence that the emperor wished to be alone, Claudius was ousted with
the rest and withdrew to an apartment called the Hermaeum; and a
little later, in great terror at the news of the murder, he stole away
to a balcony hard by and hid among the curtains which hung before the
door. As he cowered there, a common soldier, who was prowling about
at random, saw his feet, intending to ask who he was, pulled him out
and recognized him; and when Claudius fell at his feet in terror, he
hailed him as emperor. Then he took him to the rest of his comrades,
who were as yet in a condition of uncertainty and purposeless rage.
These placed him in a litter, took turns in carrying it, since his own
bearers had made off, and bore him to the Camp in a state of despair
and terror, while the throng that met him pitied him, as an innocent
man who was being hurried off to execution. Received within the
rampart, he spent the night among the sentries with much less hope
than confidence; for the consuls with the senate and the city cohorts
had taken possession of the Forum and the Capitol, resolved on
maintaining the public liberty. When he too was summoned to the House
by the tribunes of the commons, to give his advice on the situation,
he sent word that "he was detained by force and compulsion." But the
next day, since the senate was dilatory in putting through its plans
because of the tiresome bickering of those who held divergent views,
while the populace, who stood about the hall, called for one ruler and
expressly named Claudius, he allowed the armed assembly of the
soldiers to swear allegiance to him, and promised each man fifteen
thousand sesterces; being the first of the Caesars who resorted to
bribery to secure the fidelity of the troops." - Seutonius, Lives of
the Twelve Caesars, "Claudius" 10

"The hairy fifth to enslave the State
To enslave the State, though against his will,
Shall be that idiot whom all despised.
He shall have hair in a generous mop.
He shall give Rome water and winter bread
And die at the hand of his wife, no wife,
To the gain of his son, no son" - Sybilline Oracle, Robert Graves, "I,
Claudius" ch. 1

On this day in AD 41, Tiberius Claudius Drusus Nero Germanicus Caesar
was proclaimed imperator, following the murder of his nephew "Caligula".

Valete bene!

Cato
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 82875 From: Lyn Date: 2011-01-25
Subject: Re: a.d. VIII Kal. Feb.
Salve Cato, and thank you so much for these posts.



Vale,

L. Aemilia



_____

From: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com [mailto:Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf
Of Cato
Sent: Tuesday, January 25, 2011 3:46 AM
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Nova-Roma] a.d. VIII Kal. Feb.





Cato omnibus in foro SPD

Hodiernus dies est ante diem VIII Kalendas Februarias; haec dies comitialis
est.

INDUSTRY IN THE REPUBLIC AND EMPIRE

Latium, the area around Rome, was initially an agricultural region.
But the early influence of the Etruscans and the Greek colonies in
Italy had inspired the creation of a local industry. Pottery was
introduced from Campania and the art of bronze-casting from Etruria.

Rome's conquest of Italy didn't stifle industry but encourage it. It
may well have been that Roman law and order, as well as the political
stability provided the reasons for trade to thrive. Also Rome never
used its authority to insist on goods from the capital be given any
preference. Its dependent territories didn't buy goods from Rome due
to force, but because they chose to do so. Gradually, as Rome
extended its power and empire with conquests, the increasing
population and demands for luxuries, as well as the construction of
large public works caused many industries to flourish; but Rome,
although important as an industrial center, was largely a city which
consumed goods, rather than producing them. Imports exceeded exports
by far (with the exception of bronze goods which were exported all
over the empire).

As the unrivalled metropolis, Rome achieved an absolute lead in in the
production of luxury goods, particularly in articles of precious
metals, such as jewelry and engraved cups. Foreign craftsmen who
migrated to the city, mostly Greeks, created refined masterpieces in
their workshops. Meanwhile the building trade naturally became far
more developed in Rome than anywhere else.

Industry though flourished elsewhere. Genoa, Ostia and Ravenna were
Rome's major harbors, providing her with warships as well as
benefiting from the rise in shipping trade. Como, Sulmona, Salerno
and Puteoli were centres of the iron industry which received great
quantities of iron ore from the minors of Elba. Campania grew rich
not only on its fertile soil which grew, among other things, some of
the best wines, but also for its industrial products. Bronzes from
Capua, terra cotta ware from Puteoli, Cumae and Ischia, glass form
Cumae, Sorento and Pompeii, liquamen from Pompeii. Apulia produced the
finest wool. Northern Italy supplied bronze articles from Bergamo,
bricks from Modena and amphorae from Pola. So, too, did it boast a
famous woollen industry at Istria, Padua and Parma and dye works at
Aquileia. Aquileia was further also known for its cloth making and
glass industry, as well as for its workshops for amber (sucinum) which
was imported from as far away as the Baltic in northern Europe.

Industry benefited much from the existence of a large, almost
limitless empire. Technical advances were helped by the unity of the
empire which much helped the spread of new ideas. But so too, the
policing of the seas and the construction of the famous Roman roads
aided trade into the most distant countries. And all the while the
vast city of Rome and its massive standing army provided vast a demand
for goods.

The rich eastern provinces sent to Rome rare and exotic goods,
fashioned in their factories and workshops from materials from yet
more far flung regions of the world. Silk from China, emeralds from
Scythia, perfumes from Arabia, glass and papyrus from Egypt (Egypt was
the oldest glass-producing country if the Mediterranean and hence had
vast expertise in the matter, producing by far the finest glassware of
the day). In the western and northern provinces, too, industries were
greatly developed, entering into competition with Italian producers.
Spain already in the days of empire should produce some of the finest
steel, but also provided fine wool and the highest quality liquamen.
Gaul became famous for its bronze work, shoes, and woollen industry.
Noricum produced the finest weapons, the Rhine valley the best
earthenware.

"Having spent the greater part of his life under these and like
circumstances, he became emperor in his fiftieth year by a remarkable
freak of fortune. When the assassins of Gaius shut out the crowd under
pretence that the emperor wished to be alone, Claudius was ousted with
the rest and withdrew to an apartment called the Hermaeum; and a
little later, in great terror at the news of the murder, he stole away
to a balcony hard by and hid among the curtains which hung before the
door. As he cowered there, a common soldier, who was prowling about
at random, saw his feet, intending to ask who he was, pulled him out
and recognized him; and when Claudius fell at his feet in terror, he
hailed him as emperor. Then he took him to the rest of his comrades,
who were as yet in a condition of uncertainty and purposeless rage.
These placed him in a litter, took turns in carrying it, since his own
bearers had made off, and bore him to the Camp in a state of despair
and terror, while the throng that met him pitied him, as an innocent
man who was being hurried off to execution. Received within the
rampart, he spent the night among the sentries with much less hope
than confidence; for the consuls with the senate and the city cohorts
had taken possession of the Forum and the Capitol, resolved on
maintaining the public liberty. When he too was summoned to the House
by the tribunes of the commons, to give his advice on the situation,
he sent word that "he was detained by force and compulsion." But the
next day, since the senate was dilatory in putting through its plans
because of the tiresome bickering of those who held divergent views,
while the populace, who stood about the hall, called for one ruler and
expressly named Claudius, he allowed the armed assembly of the
soldiers to swear allegiance to him, and promised each man fifteen
thousand sesterces; being the first of the Caesars who resorted to
bribery to secure the fidelity of the troops." - Seutonius, Lives of
the Twelve Caesars, "Claudius" 10

"The hairy fifth to enslave the State
To enslave the State, though against his will,
Shall be that idiot whom all despised.
He shall have hair in a generous mop.
He shall give Rome water and winter bread
And die at the hand of his wife, no wife,
To the gain of his son, no son" - Sybilline Oracle, Robert Graves, "I,
Claudius" ch. 1

On this day in AD 41, Tiberius Claudius Drusus Nero Germanicus Caesar
was proclaimed imperator, following the murder of his nephew "Caligula".

Valete bene!

Cato





[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 82876 From: Gaius Date: 2011-01-25
Subject: Latin Help
Salvete omnes,

Could one of our Latinists please translate this for me?

Veritatem cognoscetis et veritas te liberabit

I have had no luck with the on-line translators :-(

Thanks!

Valete,

C. Popillius Laenas
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 82877 From: GAIUS MARCIUS CRISPUS Date: 2011-01-25
Subject: Re: Latin Help
Salve, et salvete omnes

You will know the truth and the truth shall set you free.

I'm not a latinist, but I recognised the words!

Vale, et valete omnes
Crispus

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Gaius" <gaiuspopillius@...> wrote:
>
> Salvete omnes,
>
> Could one of our Latinists please translate this for me?
>
> Veritatem cognoscetis et veritas te liberabit
>
> I have had no luck with the on-line translators :-(
>
> Thanks!
>
> Valete,
>
> C. Popillius Laenas
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 82878 From: Gaius Date: 2011-01-25
Subject: Re: Latin Help
Thanks!

Laenas

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "GAIUS MARCIUS CRISPUS" <jbshr1pwa@...> wrote:
>
> Salve, et salvete omnes
>
> You will know the truth and the truth shall set you free.
>
> I'm not a latinist, but I recognised the words!
>
> Vale, et valete omnes
> Crispus
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Gaius" <gaiuspopillius@> wrote:
> >
> > Salvete omnes,
> >
> > Could one of our Latinists please translate this for me?
> >
> > Veritatem cognoscetis et veritas te liberabit
> >
> > I have had no luck with the on-line translators :-(
> >
> > Thanks!
> >
> > Valete,
> >
> > C. Popillius Laenas
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 82879 From: jeffery craft Date: 2011-01-25
Subject: the rite
salve,

is anyone going to see the rite when it comes out?

vale bene
 
"Consider your origin, you were not born to live like brutes, but to follow
virtue and knowledge.”
 
                                                                                                                               Dante Alighieri 

 
Ti. Aurelius Trio




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 82880 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2011-01-25
Subject: Re: Latin Help
>
> A. Tullia Scholastica C. Marcio Crispo C. Popillio Laenati quiritibus bonae
> voluntatis S.P.D.
>
>
>
> Salve, et salvete omnes
>
> You will know the truth and the truth shall set you free.
>
> ATS: Essentially this is correct, but there is one little hitch: the
> first you is plural in the Latin, as marked by the verb ending, and the second
> one is singular, so Ye shall know the truth, and the truth shalt set thee
> free...there is a little problem with this Latin; it¹s not a good translation!
> Either the first verb must be put into the singular or the pronominal object
> in the second clause must be put into the plural: cognosces, or vos.
> Otherwise everyone must know the truth, but only one person will be set
> free... ;-)
>
> I'm not a latinist, but I recognised the words!
>
> ATS: Magistra recommends these Latin courses, and some information in
> your Rudimenta text...
>
> Vale, et valete omnes
> Crispus
>
> Valete!
>
>
>
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com <mailto:Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com> ,
> "Gaius" <gaiuspopillius@...> wrote:
>> >
>> > Salvete omnes,
>> >
>> > Could one of our Latinists please translate this for me?
>> >
>> > Veritatem cognoscetis et veritas te liberabit
>> >
>> > I have had no luck with the on-line translators :-(
>> >
>> > Thanks!
>> >
>> > Valete,
>> >
>> > C. Popillius Laenas
>> >
>
>
>




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 82881 From: GAIUS MARCIUS CRISPUS Date: 2011-01-25
Subject: Re: Latin Help
Salve, et Salvete omnes

I was sort of expecting you to pop in on this one, Magistra. And of course you are correct.

Fortunately English just has "You" nowadays - The King James version has "And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free". Plural in both cases.

I suspect the words, from St John, probably meant "all of you", rather than "just one of you". Otherwise it would be an extremely exclusive religion!

Is this another case of those careless monks?

Vale, et valete bene omnes

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "A. Tullia Scholastica" <fororom@...> wrote:
>
> >
> > A. Tullia Scholastica C. Marcio Crispo C. Popillio Laenati quiritibus bonae
> > voluntatis S.P.D.
> >
> >
> >
> > Salve, et salvete omnes
> >
> > You will know the truth and the truth shall set you free.
> >
> > ATS: Essentially this is correct, but there is one little hitch: the
> > first you is plural in the Latin, as marked by the verb ending, and the second
> > one is singular, so Ye shall know the truth, and the truth shalt set thee
> > free...there is a little problem with this Latin; it¹s not a good translation!
> > Either the first verb must be put into the singular or the pronominal object
> > in the second clause must be put into the plural: cognosces, or vos.
> > Otherwise everyone must know the truth, but only one person will be set
> > free... ;-)
> >
> > I'm not a latinist, but I recognised the words!
> >
> > ATS: Magistra recommends these Latin courses, and some information in
> > your Rudimenta text...
> >
> > Vale, et valete omnes
> > Crispus
> >
> > Valete!
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com <mailto:Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com> ,
> > "Gaius" <gaiuspopillius@> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > Salvete omnes,
> >> >
> >> > Could one of our Latinists please translate this for me?
> >> >
> >> > Veritatem cognoscetis et veritas te liberabit
> >> >
> >> > I have had no luck with the on-line translators :-(
> >> >
> >> > Thanks!
> >> >
> >> > Valete,
> >> >
> >> > C. Popillius Laenas
> >> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 82882 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2011-01-25
Subject: Re: Latin Help
>
>
> A. Tullia Scholastica C. Marcio Crispo quiritibus bonae voluntatis S.P.D.
>
>
> Salve, et Salvete omnes
>
> I was sort of expecting you to pop in on this one, Magistra.
>
> ATS: Funny thing about that... ;-) Had to wait until I finished the
> daily shoveling, however.
>
>
> And of course you are correct.
>
> Fortunately English just has "You" nowadays - The King James version has "And
> ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free". Plural in both
> cases.
>
> I suspect the words, from St John, probably meant "all of you", rather than
> "just one of you".
>
> ATS: Yes. You¹re starting to sound like US Southern dialect, with you
> all, y¹all, and the plural all y¹all (as we have recently been informed during
> our cram course in Southern...). The English second person pronoun collapsed
> fairly recently, and it seems that this sad loss is still felt in certain
> linguistic quarters. I suspect that this phrase was intended to be plural all
> around, but that is not what is written in the Latin version.
>
>
> Otherwise it would be an extremely exclusive religion!
>
> ATS: LOL! Methinks those exist...
>
> Is this another case of those careless monks?
>
> ATS: Probably not. There are errors in copying (which was generally done
> from a text read aloud, not one written and at hand), but I suspect that any
> monk would know THAT much Latin. This might be a mistranslation by an English
> speaker; other languages retain the distinction in the second person pronoun,
> though some keep this as a formal / informal one. I have heard, however, that
> on the net the use of the second person singular (otherwise familiar) is used
> even with strangers among speakers of languages which have this formal /
> informal distinction (French, Spanish, German...).
>
> Vale, et valete bene omnes
>
> Vale, et valete.
>
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com <mailto:Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com> , "A.
> Tullia Scholastica" <fororom@...> wrote:
>> >
>>> > >
>>> > > A. Tullia Scholastica C. Marcio Crispo C. Popillio Laenati quiritibus
>>> bonae
>>> > > voluntatis S.P.D.
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > > Salve, et salvete omnes
>>> > >
>>> > > You will know the truth and the truth shall set you free.
>>> > >
>>> > > ATS: Essentially this is correct, but there is one little hitch:
the
>>> > > first you is plural in the Latin, as marked by the verb ending, and the
>>> second
>>> > > one is singular, so Ye shall know the truth, and the truth shalt set >>>
thee
>>> > > free...there is a little problem with this Latin; it¹s not a good
>>> translation!
>>> > > Either the first verb must be put into the singular or the pronominal
>>> object
>>> > > in the second clause must be put into the plural: cognosces, or vos.
>>> > > Otherwise everyone must know the truth, but only one person will be set
>>> > > free... ;-)
>>> > >
>>> > > I'm not a latinist, but I recognised the words!
>>> > >
>>> > > ATS: Magistra recommends these Latin courses, and some information
in
>>> > > your Rudimenta text...
>>> > >
>>> > > Vale, et valete omnes
>>> > > Crispus
>>> > >
>>> > > Valete!
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com <mailto:Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com>
>>> <mailto:Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com> ,
>>> > > "Gaius" <gaiuspopillius@> wrote:
>>>>> > >> >
>>>>> > >> > Salvete omnes,
>>>>> > >> >
>>>>> > >> > Could one of our Latinists please translate this for me?
>>>>> > >> >
>>>>> > >> > Veritatem cognoscetis et veritas te liberabit
>>>>> > >> >
>>>>> > >> > I have had no luck with the on-line translators :-(
>>>>> > >> >
>>>>> > >> > Thanks!
>>>>> > >> >
>>>>> > >> > Valete,
>>>>> > >> >
>>>>> > >> > C. Popillius Laenas
>>>>> > >> >
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > >
>> >
>> >




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 82883 From: luciaiuliaaquila Date: 2011-01-25
Subject: Re: Latin Help
Iulia Magistrae Crispo omnibusque sal,

Speaking of "Southern American English", just a conjecture here but it could simply be "Southern American Latin" (the South likes to make things their own y'hear?) "Veritatem cognoscetis et veritas te liberabit" is the mot-toe of the University of Tennessee. Further here in Tennessee, there is only one Bible recognized (unofficially) and that is the King James Bible, in addition it was probably altered to be directed personally to each student so I can *almost* see their logic by neglecting the plural.
It's a southern thing *laughs* and yes I am just being silly, but we transplanted yankees like to engage in this sort of discourse every now and again;)

"Et cognoscetis veritatem et veritas liberabit vos" is what some of the Orders use (Mason, RSCRCN etc.) reflecting the plural "you" and I have a hint by their use of "vos."

"Veritas vos Liberabit" the truth will set you free is probably the more common form of the passage.
Nominative veritas; plural vos; and future active indicative, 3rd conjugation and singular? liberabit - this last word has thrown me, I think it should be plural, no? Nescio. Now I have a Latin headache.
O mi miserum;)

Valete bene

Julia

P.S. This is a chart I found when i first entered rudimenta(sp?) and has been a bit helpful;) and so was my OLD:
http://www.elushae.org/~cislyn/classics/latrev.html
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 82884 From: C.Maria Caeca Date: 2011-01-25
Subject: Re: Latin Help
Salve Crispe,

Um ...no, I doubt it, since King James was Protestant, but I suspect that what you see in that passage is a change of changing language. Words like Thee, Thou, (et al) were still used, but falling out of fashion, likewise the separation between plural and singular you was shifting to no separation, but like most things that evolve rather than are "forcibly" (and I don't mean force in the violent sense, necessarily) changed, there is a period of flux. We see this in spelling into the 19th century, in English, at least. Our use of mass communication makes language changes much faster, and more universally accepted faster and easier, as well, but you can still observe the process in such areas as slang, which changes rapidly, but where the old is not necessarily entirely discarded. You can tell someone's generation, (sometimes) by the idioms and slang they use, if they use any, and given enough time, a younger person probably won't understand the term, but it remains until it just fades away and is seen only in period literature.

Vale Bene!
Caeca

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 82885 From: Cato Date: 2011-01-25
Subject: Re: a.d. VIII Kal. Feb.
Cato L. Aemilae sal.

It's a pleasure :)

Vale bene,

Cato

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Lyn" <ldowling@...> wrote:
>
> Salve Cato, and thank you so much for these posts.
>
>
>
> Vale,
>
> L. Aemilia
>
>
>
> _____
>
> From: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com [mailto:Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf
> Of Cato
> Sent: Tuesday, January 25, 2011 3:46 AM
> To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [Nova-Roma] a.d. VIII Kal. Feb.
>
>
>
>
>
> Cato omnibus in foro SPD
>
> Hodiernus dies est ante diem VIII Kalendas Februarias; haec dies comitialis
> est.
>
> INDUSTRY IN THE REPUBLIC AND EMPIRE
>
> Latium, the area around Rome, was initially an agricultural region.
> But the early influence of the Etruscans and the Greek colonies in
> Italy had inspired the creation of a local industry. Pottery was
> introduced from Campania and the art of bronze-casting from Etruria.
>
> Rome's conquest of Italy didn't stifle industry but encourage it. It
> may well have been that Roman law and order, as well as the political
> stability provided the reasons for trade to thrive. Also Rome never
> used its authority to insist on goods from the capital be given any
> preference. Its dependent territories didn't buy goods from Rome due
> to force, but because they chose to do so. Gradually, as Rome
> extended its power and empire with conquests, the increasing
> population and demands for luxuries, as well as the construction of
> large public works caused many industries to flourish; but Rome,
> although important as an industrial center, was largely a city which
> consumed goods, rather than producing them. Imports exceeded exports
> by far (with the exception of bronze goods which were exported all
> over the empire).
>
> As the unrivalled metropolis, Rome achieved an absolute lead in in the
> production of luxury goods, particularly in articles of precious
> metals, such as jewelry and engraved cups. Foreign craftsmen who
> migrated to the city, mostly Greeks, created refined masterpieces in
> their workshops. Meanwhile the building trade naturally became far
> more developed in Rome than anywhere else.
>
> Industry though flourished elsewhere. Genoa, Ostia and Ravenna were
> Rome's major harbors, providing her with warships as well as
> benefiting from the rise in shipping trade. Como, Sulmona, Salerno
> and Puteoli were centres of the iron industry which received great
> quantities of iron ore from the minors of Elba. Campania grew rich
> not only on its fertile soil which grew, among other things, some of
> the best wines, but also for its industrial products. Bronzes from
> Capua, terra cotta ware from Puteoli, Cumae and Ischia, glass form
> Cumae, Sorento and Pompeii, liquamen from Pompeii. Apulia produced the
> finest wool. Northern Italy supplied bronze articles from Bergamo,
> bricks from Modena and amphorae from Pola. So, too, did it boast a
> famous woollen industry at Istria, Padua and Parma and dye works at
> Aquileia. Aquileia was further also known for its cloth making and
> glass industry, as well as for its workshops for amber (sucinum) which
> was imported from as far away as the Baltic in northern Europe.
>
> Industry benefited much from the existence of a large, almost
> limitless empire. Technical advances were helped by the unity of the
> empire which much helped the spread of new ideas. But so too, the
> policing of the seas and the construction of the famous Roman roads
> aided trade into the most distant countries. And all the while the
> vast city of Rome and its massive standing army provided vast a demand
> for goods.
>
> The rich eastern provinces sent to Rome rare and exotic goods,
> fashioned in their factories and workshops from materials from yet
> more far flung regions of the world. Silk from China, emeralds from
> Scythia, perfumes from Arabia, glass and papyrus from Egypt (Egypt was
> the oldest glass-producing country if the Mediterranean and hence had
> vast expertise in the matter, producing by far the finest glassware of
> the day). In the western and northern provinces, too, industries were
> greatly developed, entering into competition with Italian producers.
> Spain already in the days of empire should produce some of the finest
> steel, but also provided fine wool and the highest quality liquamen.
> Gaul became famous for its bronze work, shoes, and woollen industry.
> Noricum produced the finest weapons, the Rhine valley the best
> earthenware.
>
> "Having spent the greater part of his life under these and like
> circumstances, he became emperor in his fiftieth year by a remarkable
> freak of fortune. When the assassins of Gaius shut out the crowd under
> pretence that the emperor wished to be alone, Claudius was ousted with
> the rest and withdrew to an apartment called the Hermaeum; and a
> little later, in great terror at the news of the murder, he stole away
> to a balcony hard by and hid among the curtains which hung before the
> door. As he cowered there, a common soldier, who was prowling about
> at random, saw his feet, intending to ask who he was, pulled him out
> and recognized him; and when Claudius fell at his feet in terror, he
> hailed him as emperor. Then he took him to the rest of his comrades,
> who were as yet in a condition of uncertainty and purposeless rage.
> These placed him in a litter, took turns in carrying it, since his own
> bearers had made off, and bore him to the Camp in a state of despair
> and terror, while the throng that met him pitied him, as an innocent
> man who was being hurried off to execution. Received within the
> rampart, he spent the night among the sentries with much less hope
> than confidence; for the consuls with the senate and the city cohorts
> had taken possession of the Forum and the Capitol, resolved on
> maintaining the public liberty. When he too was summoned to the House
> by the tribunes of the commons, to give his advice on the situation,
> he sent word that "he was detained by force and compulsion." But the
> next day, since the senate was dilatory in putting through its plans
> because of the tiresome bickering of those who held divergent views,
> while the populace, who stood about the hall, called for one ruler and
> expressly named Claudius, he allowed the armed assembly of the
> soldiers to swear allegiance to him, and promised each man fifteen
> thousand sesterces; being the first of the Caesars who resorted to
> bribery to secure the fidelity of the troops." - Seutonius, Lives of
> the Twelve Caesars, "Claudius" 10
>
> "The hairy fifth to enslave the State
> To enslave the State, though against his will,
> Shall be that idiot whom all despised.
> He shall have hair in a generous mop.
> He shall give Rome water and winter bread
> And die at the hand of his wife, no wife,
> To the gain of his son, no son" - Sybilline Oracle, Robert Graves, "I,
> Claudius" ch. 1
>
> On this day in AD 41, Tiberius Claudius Drusus Nero Germanicus Caesar
> was proclaimed imperator, following the murder of his nephew "Caligula".
>
> Valete bene!
>
> Cato
>
>
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 82886 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2011-01-25
Subject: Re: Latin Help
>
> Magistra Juliae Crispo quiritibus bonae voluntatis S.P.D.
>
>
>
> Iulia Magistrae Crispo omnibusque sal,
>
> Speaking of "Southern American English", just a conjecture here but it could
> simply be "Southern American Latin"
>
> ATS: LOL!
>
>
>
> (the South likes to make things their own y'hear?) "Veritatem cognoscetis et
> veritas te liberabit" is the mot-toe of the University of Tennessee.
>
> ATS: Did somebody flunk Latin? We have these personal endings on verbs,
> you see...and your teacher will complain if you mix singulars and plurals. As
> you know, I require my Grammatica students to specify the number in the second
> person...the singular need not be marked, but the (rarer) plural must.
>
>
> Further here in Tennessee, there is only one Bible recognized (unofficially)
> and that is the King James Bible,
>
> ATS: Are they liberal or what?
>
>
> in addition it was probably altered to be directed personally to each student
> so I can *almost* see their logic by neglecting the plural.
> It's a southern thing *laughs* and yes I am just being silly, but we
> transplanted yankees like to engage in this sort of discourse every now and
> again;)
>
> "Et cognoscetis veritatem et veritas liberabit vos" is what some of the Orders
> use (Mason, RSCRCN etc.)
>
>
> ATS: What do all of these initials mean? Any relation to the KKK? ;-)
>
> reflecting the plural "you" and I have a hint by their use of "vos."
>
> "Veritas vos Liberabit" the truth will set you free is probably the more
> common form of the passage.
>
> ATS: It¹s definitely the more grammatically correct one.
>
>
> Nominative veritas; plural vos; and future active indicative, 3rd conjugation
> and singular? liberabit - this last word has thrown me, I think it should be
> plural, no?
>
> ATS: No, it¹s singular with veritas, which is a third declension
> nominative singular. Many abstract nouns in Latin are in the third declension
> and end in -tas, -tudo, or -tus. All are feminine endings. Since veritas is
> singular, its verb must also be singular, and in the third person. Your
> English teacher complains when things do not agree with one another. Your
> Latin teacher (or other FL teacher) complains more loudly...
>
> Nescio.
>
> ATS: That was the favorite answer of one of the comparative beginners at
> my Latin immersion in Seattle...one reason why we require at least two years
> of Latin, preferably a rigorous program such as our classes, BEFORE one enters
> immersion or Reggie Foster¹s courses...
>
>
> Now I have a Latin headache.
>
> ATS: Now, now...
>
> O mi miserum;)
>
> ATS: Me miseram (given that you are female, the last I checked). This is
> the accusative of exclamation, not taught in Wheelock...
>
> Valete bene
>
> Julia
>
> Vale, et valete bene.
>
>
> P.S. This is a chart I found when i first entered rudimenta(sp?) and has been
> a bit helpful;) and so was my OLD:
> http://www.elushae.org/~cislyn/classics/latrev.html
>
> Must check this out...gratias!
>
>
>




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 82887 From: Robin Marquardt Date: 2011-01-26
Subject: Re: the rite
Salve tutti,
I am!

I for one have seen paranormal.
Ti. Marcius Quadra


________________________________
From: jeffery craft <warbuff_4@...>
To: newroman@yahoogroups.com; Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wed, January 26, 2011 5:31:50 AM
Subject: [Nova-Roma] the rite


salve,

is anyone going to see the rite when it comes out?

vale bene

"Consider your origin, you were not born to live like brutes, but to follow
virtue and knowledge.”

Dante Alighieri



Ti. Aurelius Trio

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]







[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 82888 From: luciaiuliaaquila Date: 2011-01-26
Subject: Re: the rite
Salve, et salvete,

I saw the first "Paranormal" (you are talking about the movie right?) and it was the worst movie I have ever seen. Young Marcus talked me into seeing Paranormal 2. I was actually frightened and screamed aloud! A pleasant surprise and there was also comedy afoot. In the row in front of me were a group of Southern Baptist Ladies and they were getting "saved", it was hilarious - a touch of that old time relgion in theater, the scarier it got, the more frightened they became and the funnier they were! The producers utilized all the good old horror tactics for a good scare flik.
I want to see the Rite but might wait until the Eagle comes out and then just hang out in the theater one evening and watch them both.

Vale, et valete,

Julia

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Robin Marquardt <remarq777@...> wrote:
>
> Salve tutti,
> I am!
>
> I for one have seen paranormal.
> Ti. Marcius Quadra
>
>
> ________________________________
> From: jeffery craft <warbuff_4@...>
> To: newroman@yahoogroups.com; Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Wed, January 26, 2011 5:31:50 AM
> Subject: [Nova-Roma] the rite
>
>
> salve,
>
> is anyone going to see the rite when it comes out?
>
> vale bene
>
> "Consider your origin, you were not born to live like brutes, but to follow
> virtue and knowledge.”
>
> Dante Alighieri
>
>
>
> Ti. Aurelius Trio
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 82889 From: Robin Marquardt Date: 2011-01-26
Subject: The Rite
Sorry Julia,
I was talking about real life witnessing of the paranormal in my living room
with objects floating around.

Ti. Marci Quadra


________________________________
From: luciaiuliaaquila <luciaiuliaaquila@...>
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wed, January 26, 2011 3:25:31 PM
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: the rite


Salve, et salvete,

I saw the first "Paranormal" (you are talking about the movie right?) and it was
the worst movie I have ever seen. Young Marcus talked me into seeing Paranormal
2. I was actually frightened and screamed aloud! A pleasant surprise and there
was also comedy afoot. In the row in front of me were a group of Southern
Baptist Ladies and they were getting "saved", it was hilarious - a touch of that
old time relgion in theater, the scarier it got, the more frightened they became
and the funnier they were! The producers utilized all the good old horror
tactics for a good scare flik.

I want to see the Rite but might wait until the Eagle comes out and then just
hang out in the theater one evening and watch them both.

Vale, et valete,

Julia

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Robin Marquardt <remarq777@...> wrote:
>
> Salve tutti,
> I am!
>
> I for one have seen paranormal.
> Ti. Marcius Quadra
>
>
> ________________________________
> From: jeffery craft <warbuff_4@...>
> To: newroman@yahoogroups.com; Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Wed, January 26, 2011 5:31:50 AM
> Subject: [Nova-Roma] the rite
>
>
> salve,
>
> is anyone going to see the rite when it comes out?
>
> vale bene
>
> "Consider your origin, you were not born to live like brutes, but to follow
> virtue and knowledge.”
>
>
>Dante Alighieri
>
>
>
>
> Ti. Aurelius Trio
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>







[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 82890 From: luciaiuliaaquila Date: 2011-01-26
Subject: Re: Latin Help
Salve Magistra,

This email had me chuckling.

> > ATS: What do all of these initials mean? Any relation to the KKK? ;-)

As for the initials, there is an old saying, in English this time, "if you do not know what they mean then maybe you shouldn't know" or something like that *laughs* and no it has nothing to do with the KKK.

>Your
> > English teacher complains when things do not agree with one another.

I don't need and English teacher, Latin is giving me quite a refresher course.

>Your
> > Latin teacher (or other FL teacher) complains more loudly...

Quid significat "FL Teacher?" Favorite Latin Teacher perhaps? Well then, you are my favorite latin teacher who complains loudly!


> > O mi miserum;)
> >
> > ATS: Me miseram (given that you are female, the last I checked).

*laughs* I was not aware that you ever checked to verify my gender (I am now howling in laughter once again)
However I did make a note of it; one would not want to be thought of as male when she is female, now would one!

> > This is the accusative of exclamation, not taught in Wheelock...
Ok, so I must learn this from the street then?;)

Cura te, vale,

Julia


--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "A. Tullia Scholastica" <fororom@...> wrote:
>
> >
> > Magistra Juliae Crispo quiritibus bonae voluntatis S.P.D.
> >
> >
> >
> > Iulia Magistrae Crispo omnibusque sal,
> >
> > Speaking of "Southern American English", just a conjecture here but it could
> > simply be "Southern American Latin"
> >
> > ATS: LOL!
> >
> >
> >
> > (the South likes to make things their own y'hear?) "Veritatem cognoscetis et
> > veritas te liberabit" is the mot-toe of the University of Tennessee.
> >
> > ATS: Did somebody flunk Latin? We have these personal endings on verbs,
> > you see...and your teacher will complain if you mix singulars and plurals. As
> > you know, I require my Grammatica students to specify the number in the second
> > person...the singular need not be marked, but the (rarer) plural must.
> >
> >
> > Further here in Tennessee, there is only one Bible recognized (unofficially)
> > and that is the King James Bible,
> >
> > ATS: Are they liberal or what?
> >
> >
> > in addition it was probably altered to be directed personally to each student
> > so I can *almost* see their logic by neglecting the plural.
> > It's a southern thing *laughs* and yes I am just being silly, but we
> > transplanted yankees like to engage in this sort of discourse every now and
> > again;)
> >
> > "Et cognoscetis veritatem et veritas liberabit vos" is what some of the Orders
> > use (Mason, RSCRCN etc.)
> >
> >
> > ATS: What do all of these initials mean? Any relation to the KKK? ;-)
> >
> > reflecting the plural "you" and I have a hint by their use of "vos."
> >
> > "Veritas vos Liberabit" the truth will set you free is probably the more
> > common form of the passage.
> >
> > ATS: It¹s definitely the more grammatically correct one.
> >
> >
> > Nominative veritas; plural vos; and future active indicative, 3rd conjugation
> > and singular? liberabit - this last word has thrown me, I think it should be
> > plural, no?
> >
> > ATS: No, it¹s singular with veritas, which is a third declension
> > nominative singular. Many abstract nouns in Latin are in the third declension
> > and end in -tas, -tudo, or -tus. All are feminine endings. Since veritas is
> > singular, its verb must also be singular, and in the third person. Your
> > English teacher complains when things do not agree with one another. Your
> > Latin teacher (or other FL teacher) complains more loudly...
> >
> > Nescio.
> >
> > ATS: That was the favorite answer of one of the comparative beginners at
> > my Latin immersion in Seattle...one reason why we require at least two years
> > of Latin, preferably a rigorous program such as our classes, BEFORE one enters
> > immersion or Reggie Foster¹s courses...
> >
> >
> > Now I have a Latin headache.
> >
> > ATS: Now, now...
> >
> > O mi miserum;)
> >
> > ATS: Me miseram (given that you are female, the last I checked). This is
> > the accusative of exclamation, not taught in Wheelock...
> >
> > Valete bene
> >
> > Julia
> >
> > Vale, et valete bene.
> >
> >
> > P.S. This is a chart I found when i first entered rudimenta(sp?) and has been
> > a bit helpful;) and so was my OLD:
> > http://www.elushae.org/~cislyn/classics/latrev.html
> >
> > Must check this out...gratias!
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 82891 From: C.Maria Caeca Date: 2011-01-26
Subject: Re: Latin Help
Caeca Scholasticae Aquilae omnibusque Sal,

Um ...Julia ...FL= Foreign Language, I suspect. Favorite Latin Teacher might be FLT, though. Wait ...didn't I *leave* Government employment partly to get away from alphabet soup? Of course, the Romans *loved* it, especially in their inscriptions, but then, if I was chiseling lots of words (that have trimmings that make them *really* long), I probably would, too.

Valete Bene,
Caeca

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 82892 From: luciaiuliaaquila Date: 2011-01-26
Subject: Re: The Rite
Salve Marci,

Well then that is a different situation altogether.
What kind of phenomena are you experiencing?

Vale,

Julia

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Robin Marquardt <remarq777@...> wrote:
>
> Sorry Julia,
> I was talking about real life witnessing of the paranormal in my living room
> with objects floating around.
>
> Ti. Marci Quadra
>
>
> ________________________________
> From: luciaiuliaaquila <luciaiuliaaquila@...>
> To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Wed, January 26, 2011 3:25:31 PM
> Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: the rite
>
>
> Salve, et salvete,
>
> I saw the first "Paranormal" (you are talking about the movie right?) and it was
> the worst movie I have ever seen. Young Marcus talked me into seeing Paranormal
> 2. I was actually frightened and screamed aloud! A pleasant surprise and there
> was also comedy afoot. In the row in front of me were a group of Southern
> Baptist Ladies and they were getting "saved", it was hilarious - a touch of that
> old time relgion in theater, the scarier it got, the more frightened they became
> and the funnier they were! The producers utilized all the good old horror
> tactics for a good scare flik.
>
> I want to see the Rite but might wait until the Eagle comes out and then just
> hang out in the theater one evening and watch them both.
>
> Vale, et valete,
>
> Julia
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Robin Marquardt <remarq777@> wrote:
> >
> > Salve tutti,
> > I am!
> >
> > I for one have seen paranormal.
> > Ti. Marcius Quadra
> >
> >
> > ________________________________
> > From: jeffery craft <warbuff_4@>
> > To: newroman@yahoogroups.com; Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> > Sent: Wed, January 26, 2011 5:31:50 AM
> > Subject: [Nova-Roma] the rite
> >
> >
> > salve,
> >
> > is anyone going to see the rite when it comes out?
> >
> > vale bene
> >
> > "Consider your origin, you were not born to live like brutes, but to follow
> > virtue and knowledge.”
> >
> >
> >Dante Alighieri
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Ti. Aurelius Trio
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 82893 From: luciaiuliaaquila Date: 2011-01-26
Subject: Re: Latin Help
Ave Caeca (I am behaving tonight)

Well... i suppose "FL teacher" could be Foreign Language Teacher, but my explanation is more fun - so there Missy! *laughs* I like alphabet soup as well, haven't had any in a coon's age. "That's good eatin'!", the soup not the coon.... It is times like this when I realize I have been infected with southern.
Speaking of Romans. I found out earlier tonight that I share a birthday with Julius Caesar! Well with Ciaran Hinds, the fellow who played him in the series "Rome." He also happened to play Abelforth Dumbledore in Harry Potter and also plays Father Xavier in "The Rite".

Cura ut valeas y'all (singular)

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "C.Maria Caeca" <c.mariacaeca@...> wrote:
>
> Caeca Scholasticae Aquilae omnibusque Sal,
>
> Um ...Julia ...FL= Foreign Language, I suspect. Favorite Latin Teacher might be FLT, though. Wait ...didn't I *leave* Government employment partly to get away from alphabet soup? Of course, the Romans *loved* it, especially in their inscriptions, but then, if I was chiseling lots of words (that have trimmings that make them *really* long), I probably would, too.
>
> Valete Bene,
> Caeca
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 82894 From: petronius_dexter Date: 2011-01-26
Subject: Re: Latin Help
C. Petronius omnibus s.p.d.,

> Veritatem cognoscetis et veritas te liberabit
> You will know the truth and the truth shall set you free.

It is very strange that English language is unable to express the difference between "you" as plural meaning (cognoscetis) and "you" (te)as singular meaning. You wrote both "you"...

I wonder how a language as imprecise as English can have became universal.:o)

Optime valete.

C. Petronius Dexter
Arcoiali scribebat
a. d. VII Kalendas Februarias P. Vllerio C. Equitio coss.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 82895 From: Robin Marquardt Date: 2011-01-26
Subject: The Rite & Cohorts
Caro Julia,
Until I find a producer to get my story to book and screen, I'll have to limit
the description of the objects floating in the room to the objects interacted
with each other and there were more than one person in the room.

This is why I believe in higher powers, whether they are called Jesus Christ,
Apollo, Venus, or Mars.

Ti. Marci Quadra


________________________________
From: luciaiuliaaquila <luciaiuliaaquila@...>
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wed, January 26, 2011 3:51:32 PM
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: The Rite


Salve Marci,

Well then that is a different situation altogether.
What kind of phenomena are you experiencing?

Vale,

Julia

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Robin Marquardt <remarq777@...> wrote:
>
> Sorry Julia,
> I was talking about real life witnessing of the paranormal in my living room
> with objects floating around.
>
> Ti. Marci Quadra
>
>
> ________________________________
> From: luciaiuliaaquila <luciaiuliaaquila@...>
> To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Wed, January 26, 2011 3:25:31 PM
> Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: the rite
>
>
> Salve, et salvete,
>
> I saw the first "Paranormal" (you are talking about the movie right?) and it
>was
>
> the worst movie I have ever seen. Young Marcus talked me into seeing Paranormal
>
> 2. I was actually frightened and screamed aloud! A pleasant surprise and there

> was also comedy afoot. In the row in front of me were a group of Southern
> Baptist Ladies and they were getting "saved", it was hilarious - a touch of
>that
>
> old time relgion in theater, the scarier it got, the more frightened they
>became
>
> and the funnier they were! The producers utilized all the good old horror
> tactics for a good scare flik.
>
> I want to see the Rite but might wait until the Eagle comes out and then just
> hang out in the theater one evening and watch them both.
>
> Vale, et valete,
>
> Julia
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Robin Marquardt <remarq777@> wrote:
> >
> > Salve tutti,
> > I am!
> >
> > I for one have seen paranormal.
> > Ti. Marcius Quadra
> >
> >
> > ________________________________
> > From: jeffery craft <warbuff_4@>
> > To: newroman@yahoogroups.com; Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> > Sent: Wed, January 26, 2011 5:31:50 AM
> > Subject: [Nova-Roma] the rite
> >
> >
> > salve,
> >
> > is anyone going to see the rite when it comes out?
> >
> > vale bene
> >
> > "Consider your origin, you were not born to live like brutes, but to follow
> > virtue and knowledge.”
> >
> >
> >Dante Alighieri
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Ti. Aurelius Trio
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>







[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 82896 From: iulius sabinus Date: 2011-01-26
Subject: Re: Latin Help
SALVE!

--- On Wed, 1/26/11, petronius_dexter <jfarnoud94@...> wrote:



I wonder how a language as imprecise as English can have became universal.:o)>>>
 

Exactly this is the reason for universality. The world is not composed of professional linguists but from people who want to interact with other people in simple way. Well, English language allows that.
VALE,
Sabinus




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 82897 From: Gnaeus Iulius Caesar Date: 2011-01-26
Subject: Re: Latin Help
Caesar Sabino sal.

Well it seems quite simple to me :) Trouble is it all got a bit messed up after 1776 <cough>.

Optime vale

--- On Tue, 1/25/11, iulius sabinus <iulius_sabinus@...> wrote:

> From: iulius sabinus <iulius_sabinus@...>
> Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: Latin Help
> To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> Date: Tuesday, January 25, 2011, 11:57 PM
> SALVE!
>
> --- On Wed, 1/26/11, petronius_dexter <jfarnoud94@...>
> wrote:
>
>
>
> I wonder how a language as imprecise as English can have
> became universal.:o)>>>
>  
>
> Exactly this is the reason for universality. The world is
> not composed of professional linguists but from people who
> want to interact with other people in simple way. Well,
> English language allows that.
> VALE,
> Sabinus
>
>
>      
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>     Nova-Roma-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com
>
>
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 82898 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2011-01-26
Subject: Re: Latin Help
>
> Salve, Julia, et salvete, quirites bonae voluntatis.
>
>
>
> Salve Magistra,
>
> This email had me chuckling.
>
>>> > > ATS: What do all of these initials mean? Any relation to the KKK?
;-)
>
> As for the initials, there is an old saying, in English this time, "if you do
> not know what they mean then maybe you shouldn't know" or something like that
> *laughs* and no it has nothing to do with the KKK.
>
> ATS2: Well, you know I was teasing about that...just another of those
> weird Southern things, you know, but that one came up north and spurred some
> to cross-burning on my great-grandmother¹s lawn. Wrong religion, you see.
>
>> >Your
>>> > > English teacher complains when things do not agree with one another.
>
> I don't need and English teacher, Latin is giving me quite a refresher course.
>
> ATS2: LOL! Latin WILL do that! Who needs English teachers when Latin is
> so much more precise? And produces better marks on the SAT?
>
>> >Your
>>> > > Latin teacher (or other FL teacher) complains more loudly...
>
> Quid significat "FL Teacher?" Favorite Latin Teacher perhaps? Well then, you
> are my favorite latin teacher who complains loudly!
>
> ATS2: Foreign language teacher, as Caeca pointed out. I¹m glad that I¹m
> your favorite Latin teacher, even complaining loudly.
>
>>> > > O mi miserum;)
>>> > >
>>> > > ATS: Me miseram (given that you are female, the last I checked).
>
> *laughs* I was not aware that you ever checked to verify my gender (I am now
> howling in laughter once again)
>
> ATS2: No need; it¹s obvious. ;-))) So is mine to most; no one will ever
> confuse me with a guy...but in my youth, when men wore long hair and women
> were just starting to wear pants on a regular basis, a group of idiots asked
> me what sex I was. Poor dears have such problems; in psych class we learned
> that that sort of thing is established around age four, not the teens. I
> guess they could not see that I have this prominent chest apparatus...
>
>
> However I did make a note of it; one would not want to be thought of as male
> when she is female, now would one!
>
> ATS2: Very definitely not...though I think some prefer to confuse others.
> I have encountered a couple of individuals whose gender could not be
> determined by outward appearance...
>
>
>>> > > This is the accusative of exclamation, not taught in Wheelock...
> Ok, so I must learn this from the street then?;)
>
> ATS2: Well, a lot of Latin has to be learnt on the street... ;-)
> However, Wheelock just covers the very basics; he does not go into the more
> detailed grammar found in Jenney or some of the other older texts, and
> moreover does not teach the standard Latin I vocabulary leading up to
> excursions in the Bellum Gallicum. Thus if we ever add a course in Caesar, we
> will have to teach the vocabulary first...
>
> Cura te, vale,
>
> Julia
>
> Vale, et valete!
>
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com <mailto:Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com> , "A.
> Tullia Scholastica" <fororom@...> wrote:
>> >
>>> > >
>>> > > Magistra Juliae Crispo quiritibus bonae voluntatis S.P.D.
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > > Iulia Magistrae Crispo omnibusque sal,
>>> > >
>>> > > Speaking of "Southern American English", just a conjecture here but it
>>> could
>>> > > simply be "Southern American Latin"
>>> > >
>>> > > ATS: LOL!
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > > (the South likes to make things their own y'hear?) "Veritatem
>>> cognoscetis et
>>> > > veritas te liberabit" is the mot-toe of the University of Tennessee.
>>> > >
>>> > > ATS: Did somebody flunk Latin? We have these personal endings on
>>> verbs,
>>> > > you see...and your teacher will complain if you mix singulars and
>>> plurals. As
>>> > > you know, I require my Grammatica students to specify the number in the
>>> second
>>> > > person...the singular need not be marked, but the (rarer) plural must.
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > > Further here in Tennessee, there is only one Bible recognized
>>> (unofficially)
>>> > > and that is the King James Bible,
>>> > >
>>> > > ATS: Are they liberal or what?
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > > in addition it was probably altered to be directed personally to each
>>> student
>>> > > so I can *almost* see their logic by neglecting the plural.
>>> > > It's a southern thing *laughs* and yes I am just being silly, but we
>>> > > transplanted yankees like to engage in this sort of discourse every now
and
>>> > > again;)
>>> > >
>>> > > "Et cognoscetis veritatem et veritas liberabit vos" is what some of the
>>> Orders
>>> > > use (Mason, RSCRCN etc.)
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > > ATS: What do all of these initials mean? Any relation to the KKK?
;-)
>>> > >
>>> > > reflecting the plural "you" and I have a hint by their use of "vos."
>>> > >
>>> > > "Veritas vos Liberabit" the truth will set you free is probably the more
>>> > > common form of the passage.
>>> > >
>>> > > ATS: It¹s definitely the more grammatically correct one.
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > > Nominative veritas; plural vos; and future active indicative, 3rd
>>> conjugation
>>> > > and singular? liberabit - this last word has thrown me, I think it
>>> should be
>>> > > plural, no?
>>> > >
>>> > > ATS: No, it¹s singular with veritas, which is a third declension
>>> > > nominative singular. Many abstract nouns in Latin are in the third
>>> declension
>>> > > and end in -tas, -tudo, or -tus. All are feminine endings. Since
>>> veritas is
>>> > > singular, its verb must also be singular, and in the third person. Your
>>> > > English teacher complains when things do not agree with one another.
>>> Your
>>> > > Latin teacher (or other FL teacher) complains more loudly...
>>> > >
>>> > > Nescio.
>>> > >
>>> > > ATS: That was the favorite answer of one of the comparative
>>> beginners at
>>> > > my Latin immersion in Seattle...one reason why we require at least two
>>> years
>>> > > of Latin, preferably a rigorous program such as our classes, BEFORE one
>>> enters
>>> > > immersion or Reggie Foster¹s courses...
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > > Now I have a Latin headache.
>>> > >
>>> > > ATS: Now, now...
>>> > >
>>> > > O mi miserum;)
>>> > >
>>> > > ATS: Me miseram (given that you are female, the last I checked).
>>> This is
>>> > > the accusative of exclamation, not taught in Wheelock...
>>> > >
>>> > > Valete bene
>>> > >
>>> > > Julia
>>> > >
>>> > > Vale, et valete bene.
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > > P.S. This is a chart I found when i first entered rudimenta(sp?) and has
>>> been
>>> > > a bit helpful;) and so was my OLD:
>>> > > http://www.elushae.org/~cislyn/classics/latrev.html
>>> > >
>>> > > Must check this out...gratias!
>>> > >




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 82899 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2011-01-26
Subject: Re: Latin Help
Scholastica Petronio quiritibus bonae voluntatis S.P.D.

> C. Petronius omnibus s.p.d.,
>
>> Veritatem cognoscetis et veritas te liberabit
>> You will know the truth and the truth shall set you free.
>
> It is very strange that English language is unable to express the difference
> between "you" as plural meaning (cognoscetis) and "you" (te)as singular
> meaning. You wrote both "you"...

We have little choice. The two second person pronouns merged (or as
linguists say, collapsed) a couple or three centuries ago. They survive in
prayers, but most people do not know the difference between thee and thou
and thy and thine, to say nothing of ye. 'Your' survives, so that is
understood.

We cannot tutoyer in English; it's a very democratic language.
>
> I wonder how a language as imprecise as English can have became universal.:o)

It's because it is very immodest; it shucked almost all of its inherited
Germanic grammar, and runs around minus its grammatical clothing. It
therefore can both borrow and lend words as is, and since the morphology is
all but nonexistent, it's easy to learn the basics. As I tell my Latin
students, Latin is very modest; it never goes out in public without at least
a minimum of grammatical clothing. French may be even more so, blessed with
two literary tenses, conditional mode as well as subjunctive mode, and
umpteen principal parts...plus there are lots of letters one has to write,
but which are never pronounced. ;-))))) (jocor...)
>
> Optime valete.

Optime vale et valete.
>
> C. Petronius Dexter
> Arcoiali scribebat
> a. d. VII Kalendas Februarias P. Vllerio C. Equitio coss.
>
>
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 82900 From: Cato Date: 2011-01-26
Subject: a.d. VII Kal. Feb.
Cato omnibus in foro SPD

Hodiernus dies est ante diem VII Kalendas Februarius; haec dies comitialis est.


"Numa, upon taking over the rule, did not disturb the individual
hearths of the curiae, but erected one common to them all in the space
between the Capitoline hill and the Palatine (for these hills had
already been united by a single wall into one city, and the Forum, in
which the temple is built, lies between them), and he enacted, in
accordance with the ancestral custom of the Latins, that the guarding
of the holy things should be committed to virgins. There is some
doubt, however, what it is that is kept in this temple and for what
reason the care of it has been assigned to virgins, some affirming
that nothing is preserved there but the fire, which is visible to
everybody. And they very reasonably argue that the custody of the fire
was committed to virgins, rather than to men, because fire in
incorrupt and a virgin is undefiled, and the most chaste of mortal
things must be agreeable to the purest of those that are divine. And
they regard the fire as consecrated to Vesta because that goddess,
being the earthLink to the editor's note at the bottom of this page
and occupying the central place in the universe, kindles the celestial
fires from herself. But there are some who say that besides the fire
there are some holy things in the temple of the goddess that may not
be revealed to the public, of which only the pontiffs and the virgins
have knowledge. As a strong confirmation of this story they cite
what happened at the burning of the temple during the First Punic War
between the Romans and the Carthaginians over Sicily. For when the
temple caught fire and the virgins fled from the flames, one of the
pontiffs, Lucius Caecilius, called Metellus, a man of consular rank,
the same who exhibited a hundred and thirty-eight elephants in the
memorable triumph which he celebrated for his defeat of the
Carthaginians in Sicily, neglecting his own safety for the sake of the
public good, ventured to force his way into the burning structure,
and, snatching up the holy things which the virgins had abandoned,
saved them from the fire; for which he received the honours from the
State, as the inscription upon his statue on the Capitol testifies.
Taking this incident, then, as an admitted fact, they add some
conjectures of their own. Thus, some affirm that the objects preserved
here are a part of those holy things which were once in Samothrace;
that Dardanus removed them out of that island into the city which he
himself had built, and that Aeneas, when he fled from the Troad,
brought them along with the other holy things into Italy. But others
declare that it is the Palladium that fell from Heaven, the same that
was in the possession of the people of Ilium; for they hold that
Aeneas, being well acquainted with it, brought it into Italy, whereas
the Achaeans stole away the copy — an incident about which many
stories have been related both by poets and by historians. section
6For my part, I find from very many evidences that there are indeed
some holy things, unknown to the public, kept by the virgins, and not
the fire alone; but what they are I do not think should be inquired
into too curiously, either by me of by anyone else who wishes to
observe the reverence due to the gods." - Dionysius of Halicarnassus,
"Roman Antiquities" 2.66

EARLY ROME

"Fourteen miles from the mouth of the Tiber, the monotonous level of the plain through which the river flows is broken by a cluster of hills. The seven hills of historic Rome were the Aventine, Capitoline, Coelian, Esquiline (the highest, 218 feet), Palatine, Quirinal, and Viminal. The Janiculum was on the other side of the Tiber, and was held by the early Romans as a stronghold against the Etruscans. It was connected with Rome by a wooden bridge (Pons Sublicius). The hills rose to a considerable height, around one of which, the PALATINE, first settled a tribe of Latins called RAMNES, a name gradually changed to ROMANS.

When this settlement was formed is not known. Tradition says in 753 BC. It may have been much earlier. These first settlers of Rome were possibly a colony from Alba. In the early stages of their history they united themselves with a Sabine colony that had settled north of them on the QUIRINAL HILL. The name of TITIES was given to this new tribe. A third tribe, named LUCERES, composed, possibly, of conquered Latins, was afterwards added and settled upon the COELIAN HILL.

All early communities, to which the Romans were no exception, were composed of several groups of FAMILIES. The Romans called these groups GENTES, and a single group was called a GENS. All the members of a gens were descended from a common ancestor, after whom the gens received its name.

The head of each family was called PATER FAMILIAS, and he had absolute authority (called patria potestas) over his household, even in the matter of life and death.

The Roman government at first was conducted by these Fathers of the families, with a KING, elected from their own number, and holding office for life. His duties were to command the army, to perform certain sacrifices (as high priest), and to preside over the assembly of the Fathers of the families, which was called the SENATE, i. e. an assembly of old men (senex).

This body was probably originally composed of all the Fathers of the families, but in historical times it was limited to THREE HUNDRED members, holding life office, and appointed during the regal period by the king. Later the appointment was made by the Consuls, still later by the Censors, and for nearly one hundred years before Christ all persons who had held certain offices were thereby vested with the right of seats in the Senate. Hence, during this later period, the number of Senators was greatly in excess of three hundred. The Senators, when addressed, were called PATRES, or "Fathers," for they were Fathers of the families.

The Romans, as we saw above, were divided at first into three tribes, Ramnes, Tities, and Luceres Each tribe was subdivided into ten districts called CURIAE, and each curia into ten clans called GENTES (3 tribes, 30 curiae, and 300 gentes). Every Roman citizen, therefore, belonged to a particular family, at the head of which was a paterfamilias; every family belonged to a particular gens, named after a common ancestor; every gens belonged to a particular curia; and every curia to a particular tribe.

We have learned that in the early government of Rome there was a king, and a senate that advised the king. Besides this, there was an assembly composed of all Roman citizens who could bear arms. We must remember that at this time no one was a Roman citizen who did not belong to some family. All other residents were either slaves or had no political rights, i.e. had no voice in the government. This assembly of Roman citizens met, from time to time, in an enclosed space called the COMITIUM, which means a place of gathering or coming together. This was between the Palatine and Quirinal hills near the FORUM, or market-place. This assembly itself was called the COMITIA CURIATA, i.e. an assembly composed of the 30 curiae. This body alone had the power of changing the existing laws; of declaring war or peace; and of confirming the election of kings made by the senate. The voting in this assembly was taken by each curia, and the majority of the curiae decided any question." - Ancient Rome from the Earliest Times", Robert F. Pennell (1890)

Valete bene!

Cato
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 82901 From: Delphicapollo Date: 2011-01-26
Subject: Re: Latin Help
English became widespread for several reasons, but "ease" wasn't one
of them. English is considered a difficult language to learn,
precisely because of the lack of rules or cosistency: Each of those
exceptions has to be memorized, you see.

No, the dominance of English begins with the English Empire, which
covered a quarter of the globe and poked it's nose into just about
everything. There was also a small American Empire during the
Colonial Era, which further helped to spread English.

In both cases, there followed business interests and missionary
activity. If you didn't pick up English for political purposes, then
perhaps you did for business or religious reasons.

Then came Culture. Remember that the Colonial Era was only ended after
WWII. By that time English influence included cinemas showing English
language films, music halls, radio stations and everything else - in
English, of course. TV often only came after Independence, but was
usually introduced by an Emglish speaking ebtrpreneur there to serve
the English speaking portion of the former colony.

During WWII much of the world relied on British or American weapons
and manufactured goods.

After WWII the US had the only undamaged industrial base: All who
wanted to rebuild or modernize needed to know English.

Up to modern times it's been Hollywood and the music industry leading
the spread of English, and maintaining it where it had already been
spread, which is just as important: If a language isn't used, it is
lost.

Now in modern times it is yhe Internet. An American invention, it was
meant to link Universities for research - in English, mainly.
Then came it's non-Academic spread, into what we know today, and it's
spreading English worldwide! Usually anything new comes out in
English, and then translations into other languages follows, so to
stay current you need English.

The same is often true in medical and scientific reearch: To stay on
the cutting edge you need to read English, so you can read the latest
research as it is publshed.

I've had many immigrant friends over the years, and they all report
that English is fiendishly difficult to learn! However, it's utility
is unmatched.

- S E M Troianus

Sent from my iPhone

On Jan 26, 2011, at 1:57 AM, iulius sabinus <iulius_sabinus@...>
wrote:

> SALVE!
>
> --- On Wed, 1/26/11, petronius_dexter <jfarnoud94@...> wrote:
>
> I wonder how a language as imprecise as English can have became
> universal.:o)>>>
>
>
> Exactly this is the reason for universality. The world is not
> composed of professional linguists but from people who want to
> interact with other people in simple way. Well, English language
> allows that.
> VALE,
> Sabinus
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 82902 From: iulius sabinus Date: 2011-01-26
Subject: Re: Latin Help
SALVE TROIANE!
 
Thank you for information.
 
VALE BENE,
Sabinus

"Every individual is the architect of his own fortune" - Appius Claudius

--- On Wed, 1/26/11, Delphicapollo <delphicapollo@...> wrote:


From: Delphicapollo <delphicapollo@...>
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: Latin Help
To: "Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com" <Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com>
Date: Wednesday, January 26, 2011, 6:28 PM


 



English became widespread for several reasons, but "ease" wasn't one
of them. English is considered a difficult language to learn,
precisely because of the lack of rules or cosistency: Each of those
exceptions has to be memorized, you see.

No, the dominance of English begins with the English Empire, which
covered a quarter of the globe and poked it's nose into just about
everything. There was also a small American Empire during the
Colonial Era, which further helped to spread English.

In both cases, there followed business interests and missionary
activity. If you didn't pick up English for political purposes, then
perhaps you did for business or religious reasons.

Then came Culture. Remember that the Colonial Era was only ended after
WWII. By that time English influence included cinemas showing English
language films, music halls, radio stations and everything else - in
English, of course. TV often only came after Independence, but was
usually introduced by an Emglish speaking ebtrpreneur there to serve
the English speaking portion of the former colony.

During WWII much of the world relied on British or American weapons
and manufactured goods.

After WWII the US had the only undamaged industrial base: All who
wanted to rebuild or modernize needed to know English.

Up to modern times it's been Hollywood and the music industry leading
the spread of English, and maintaining it where it had already been
spread, which is just as important: If a language isn't used, it is
lost.

Now in modern times it is yhe Internet. An American invention, it was
meant to link Universities for research - in English, mainly.
Then came it's non-Academic spread, into what we know today, and it's
spreading English worldwide! Usually anything new comes out in
English, and then translations into other languages follows, so to
stay current you need English.

The same is often true in medical and scientific reearch: To stay on
the cutting edge you need to read English, so you can read the latest
research as it is publshed.

I've had many immigrant friends over the years, and they all report
that English is fiendishly difficult to learn! However, it's utility
is unmatched.

- S E M Troianus

Sent from my iPhone

On Jan 26, 2011, at 1:57 AM, iulius sabinus <iulius_sabinus@...>
wrote:

> SALVE!
>
> --- On Wed, 1/26/11, petronius_dexter <jfarnoud94@...> wrote:
>
> I wonder how a language as imprecise as English can have became
> universal.:o)>>>
>
>
> Exactly this is the reason for universality. The world is not
> composed of professional linguists but from people who want to
> interact with other people in simple way. Well, English language
> allows that.
> VALE,
> Sabinus
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]











[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 82903 From: Cato Date: 2011-01-26
Subject: HOW LATIN BECAME THE LANGUAGE OF THE WORLD, PART I
Cato omnibus in foro SPD

In keeping with this thread, I'd like to offer a three-part essay on the development and spread of the Latin language.

"How the armies of Rome mastered the nations of the world is known to every reader of history, but the story of the conquest by Latin of the languages of the world is vague in the minds of most of us. If we should ask ourselves how it came about, we should probably think of the world-wide supremacy of Latin as a natural result of the world-wide supremacy of the Roman legions or of Roman law. But in making this assumption we should be shutting our eyes to the history of our own times. A conquered people does not necessarily accept, perhaps it has not commonly accepted, the tongue of its master. In his 'Ancient and Modern Imperialism' Lord Cromer states that in India only one hundred people in every ten thousand can read and write English, and this condition exists after an occupation of one hundred and fifty years or more. He adds: 'There does not appear the least prospect of French supplanting Arabic in Algeria.' In comparing the results of ancient and modern methods perhaps he should have taken into account the fact that India and Algeria have literatures of their own, which most of the outlying peoples subdued by Rome did not have, and these literatures may have strengthened the resistance which the tongue of the conquered people has offered to that of the conqueror, but, even when allowance is made for this fact, the difference in resultant conditions is surprising. From its narrow confines, within a little district on the banks of the Tiber, covering, at the close of the fifth century B.C., less than a hundred square miles, Latin spread through Italy and the islands of the Mediterranean, through France, Spain, England, northern Africa, and the Danubian provinces, triumphing over all the other tongues of those regions more completely than Roman arms triumphed over the peoples using them.

In tracing the story we must keep in our mind's eye the linguistic geography of Italy, just as we must remember the political geography of the peninsula in following Rome's territorial expansion. Let us think at the outset, then, of a little strip of flat country on the Tiber, dotted here and there with hills crowned with villages. Such hill towns were Rome, Tusculum, and Praeneste, for instance. Each of them was the stronghold and market-place of the country immediately about it, and therefore had a life of its own, so that although Latin was spoken in all of them it varied from one to the other. This is shown clearly enough by the inscriptions which have been found on the sites of these ancient towns, and as late as the close of the third century before our era, Plautus pokes fun in his comedies at the provincialism of Praeneste.

The towns which we have mentioned were only a few miles from Rome. Beyond them, and occupying central Italy and a large part of southern Italy, were people who spoke Oscan and the other Italic dialects, which were related to Latin, and yet quite distinct from it. In the seaports of the south Greek was spoken, while the Messapians and Iapygians occupied Calabria. To the north of Rome were the mysterious Etruscans and the almost equally puzzling Venetians and Ligurians. When we follow the Roman legions across the Alps into Switzerland, France, England, Spain, and Africa, we enter a jungle, as it were, of languages and dialects. A mere reading of the list of tongues with which Latin was brought into contact, if such a list could be drawn up, would bring weariness to the flesh. In the part of Gaul conquered by Caesar, for instance, he tells us that there were three independent languages, and sixty distinct states, whose peoples doubtless differed from one another in their speech. If we look at a map of the Roman world under Augustus, with the Atlantic to bound it on the west, the Euphrates on the east, the desert of Sahara on the south, and the Rhine and Danube on the north, and recall the fact that the linguistic conditions which Caesar found in Gaul in 58 B.C. were typical of what confronted Latin in a great many of the western, southern, and northern provinces, the fact that Latin subdued all these different tongues, and became the every-day speech of these different peoples, will be recognized as one of the marvels of history. In fact, so firmly did it establish itself, that it withstood the assaults of the invading Gothic, Lombardic, Frankish, and Burgundian, and has continued to hold to our own day a very large part of the territory which it acquired some two thousand years ago.

That Latin was the common speech of the western world is attested not only by the fact that the languages of France, Spain, Roumania, and the other Romance countries descend from it, but it is also clearly shown by the thousands of Latin inscriptions composed by freeman and freedman, by carpenter, baker, and soldier, which we find all over the Roman world.

How did this extraordinary result come about? It was not the conquest of the world by the common language of Italy, because in Italy in early days at least nine different languages were spoken, but its subjugation by the tongue spoken in the city of Rome. The traditional narrative of Rome, as Livy and others relate it, tells us of a struggle with the neighboring Latin hill towns in the early days of the Republic, and the ultimate formation of an alliance between them and Rome. The favorable position of the city on the Tiber for trade and defence gave it a great advantage over its rivals, and it soon became the commercial and political centre of the neighboring territory. The most important of these villages, Tusculum, Præneste, and Lanuvium, were not more than twenty miles distant, and the people in them must have come constantly to Rome to attend the markets, and in later days to vote, to hear political speeches, and to listen to plays in the theatre. Some of them probably heard the jests at the expense of their dialectal peculiarities which Plautus introduced into his comedies.

The younger generations became ashamed of their provincialisms; they imitated the Latin spoken in the metropolis, and by the second century of our era, when the Latin grammarians have occasion to cite dialectal peculiarities from Latium outside Rome, they quote at second-hand from Varro of the first century B.C., either because they will not take the trouble to use their own ears or because the differences which were noted in earlier days had ceased to exist. The first stage in the conquest of the world by the Latin of Rome comes to an end, then, with the extension of that form of speech throughout Latium.

Beyond the limits of Latium it came into contact with Oscan and the other Italic dialects, which were related to Latin, but of course were much farther removed from it than the Latin of Tusculum or Lanuvium had been, so that the adoption of Latin was not so simple a matter as the acceptance of Roman Latin by the villages of Latium near Rome had been.

The conflict which went on between Latin and its Italic kinsmen is revealed to us now and then by a Latin inscription, into which Oscan or Umbrian forms have crept. The struggle had come to an end by the beginning of our era. A few Oscan inscriptions are found scratched on the walls of Pompeii after the first earthquake, in 63 A.D., but they are late survivals, and no Umbrian inscriptions are known of a date subsequent to the first century B.C.

The Social War of 90-88 B.C., between Rome and the Italians, was a turning-point in the struggle between Latin and the Italic dialects, because it marks a change in the political treatment of Rome's dependencies in Italy. Up to this time she had followed the policy of isolating all her Italian conquered communities from one another. She was anxious to prevent them from conspiring against her. Thus, with this object in view, she made differences in the rights and privileges granted to neighboring communities, in order that, not being subject to the same limitations, and therefore not having the same grievances, they might not have a common basis for joint action against her. It would naturally be a part of that policy to allow or to encourage the retention by the several communities of their own dialects. The common use of Latin would have enabled them to combine against her with greater ease. With the conclusion of the Social War this policy gave way before the new conception of political unity for the people of Italian stock, and with political unity came the introduction of Latin as the common tongue in all official transactions of a local as well as of a federal character.

The immediate results of the war, and the policy which Rome carried out at its close of sending out colonies and building roads in Italy, contributed still more to the larger use of Latin throughout the central and southern parts of the peninsula. Samnium, Lucania, and the territory of the Bruttii suffered severely from depopulation; many colonies were sent into all these districts, so that, although the old dialects must have persisted for a time in some of the mountain towns to the north of Rome, the years following the conclusion of the Social War mark the rapid disappearance of them and the substitution of Latin in their place. Campania took little part in the war, and was therefore left untouched. This fact accounts probably for the occurrence of a few Oscan inscriptions on the walls of Pompeii as late as 63 A.D.

We need not follow here the story of the subjugation of the Greek seaports in southern Italy and of the peoples to the north who spoke non-Italic languages. In all these cases Latin was brought into conflict with languages not related to itself, and the situation contains slightly different elements from those which present themselves in the struggle between Latin and the Italic dialects. The latter were nearly enough related to Latin to furnish some support for the theory that Latin was modified by contact with them, and this theory has found advocates,[4] but there is no sufficient reason for believing that it was materially influenced. An interesting illustration of the influence of Greek on the Latin of every-day life is furnished by the realistic novel which Petronius wrote in the middle of the first century of our era. The characters in his story are Greeks, and the language which they speak is Latin, but they introduce into it a great many Greek words, and now and then a Greek idiom or construction." - Frank Frost Abbott, The Common People of Ancient Rome (1911)

Valete,

Cato
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 82904 From: Publius Memmius Albucius Date: 2011-01-26
Subject: Withdrawal of the censorial nota against Q. Caecilius
Caecilio s.d.

You will find below the withdrawal of the censorial nota placed upon your head.

Both censors are convinced that you will show the same dignified behavior that was yours during these last months.


On behalf of both censors,
P. Memmius Albucius
censor

--------------------------------------

Censores Iulius and Memmius,







In view of the nota issued pridie idus Quint. 2763 auc by censors Fabius Buteo and Iulius,

Considering that, in consideration of both the committed offence and the good behavior of Q. Caecilius Metellus Postumianus Pius since, along with the efforts done by him to contribute to the defence of Nova Roma institutions and to its public services,

Jointly decide :

Article 2

The nota issued pridie idus Quint. 2763 auc by censors Fabius Buteo and Iulius is hereby repealed.


Article 2

Every novaroman public officer and her/his department must, as far as they are concerned, enforce the present edict, which will be published in the Tabularium Novae Romae and in Nova Roma relevant internet 'discussion' lists, as well as notified to Q. Caecilius Metellus Postumianus Pius.


Edictum a.d. VI Kal. Feb. MMDCCLXIV a.u.c. (27th January 2011 c.c.) P. Ullerius C. Equitius coss.

-----------------------------------------------nota pridie idus Quint. 2763-----------------------------------------------------------




SALVETE!

There are moments when Nova Roma, as the modern restoration of the ancient Roman Republic society, following the principles of ancient Rome culture, civilization and values in the way they are described in the preamble of our Constitution and nova roman laws, must pay attention to it public morality.

Public morality represents one of the censors' duties guaranteed through mos maiorum and Nova Roman Constitution. The term itself includes many interpretations but in first line is related to moral and ethical values of a society, community or group and is applied to public life and to conduct in public places.

It is expected as Nova Roman citizens to understand the importance of Roman values and to promote them inside our community through the personal example, in order to create a basis for what we consider as our own moral and ethical standards and more than that, our own moral code in connection with specific Roman culture, civilization and religion we follow.

Without that, personal and public virtues as dignitas, gravitas, honestas, pietas, veritas, aequitas and nobilitas will remain only empty words.
Without that, Nova Roma, will not succeed in it mission to recreate the best of ancient Rome.

To public characterize a member of our community with words as: "worthless pissant who would be better serving as a mop for the floors of the brothels of Las Vegas than in any official position within Nova Roma or any other organization which intends to hold repute", is more than an insult and the comment belong to improper behavior displayed in a public place how Nova Roma mailing list is.

These words deny any dignity to the human being and in the last part of the phrase of the women and affect one reputation and image.

* Reference: the mailing list message of Q. Caecilius Metellus Postumianus Pius no. 77802:

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma/message/77802

Therefore, we the censores K. Fabius Buteo Modianus and T. Iulius Sabinus in agreement and in concordance with the authority we were invested by the People of Nova Roma and the Nova Roman Constitution, 5.IV.A.1.f1, issue a nota against citizen, legatus pro praetore and pontifex Q. Caecilius Metellus Postumianus Pius.

"A nota against an ordinary individual is sufficient to deprive that individual of the right to vote until such time as it is removed"

Q. Caecilius Metellus Postumianus Pius is deprived of the right to vote until such time the current nota is removed.

Datum pridie idus Quint. 2763 auc.

K. Fabius Buteo Modianus
T. Iulius Sabinus
Censores.





[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 82905 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2011-01-27
Subject: Re: HOW LATIN BECAME THE LANGUAGE OF THE WORLD, PART I
>
> A. Tullia Scholastica C. Equitio Catoni quiritibus bonae voluntatis S.P.D.
>
> Comments interleaved. I recommend the Rudimenta Latina text, A Natural
> History of Latin, by Tore Janson (translated by Merethe Damsgård Sørensen and
> Nigel Vincent, OUP 2004) for a fuller and much more recent treatment of the
> development of Latin.
>
>
>
> Cato omnibus in foro SPD
>
> In keeping with this thread, I'd like to offer a three-part essay on the
> development and spread of the Latin language.
>
> ATS: As those in the Rudimenta course may be aware, their text (A Natural
> History of Latin) deals with this subject in a very interesting manner...and
> was written a lot more recently than the text copied below.
>
> "How the armies of Rome mastered the nations of the world is known to every
> reader of history, but the story of the conquest by Latin of the languages of
> the world is vague in the minds of most of us. If we should ask ourselves how
> it came about, we should probably think of the world-wide supremacy of Latin
> as a natural result of the world-wide supremacy of the Roman legions or of
> Roman law. But in making this assumption we should be shutting our eyes to the
> history of our own times. A conquered people does not necessarily accept,
> perhaps it has not commonly accepted, the tongue of its master. In his
> 'Ancient and Modern Imperialism' Lord Cromer states that in India only one
> hundred people in every ten thousand can read and write English,
>
> ATS: I strongly suspect that this has changed quite a bit since the day
> of Lord Cromer (whoever he was). The deshis have to know English so that they
> can manage our American bank accounts...and do many other things which used to
> be done west of the Atlantic.
>
>
> and this condition exists after an occupation of one hundred and fifty years
> or more. He adds: 'There does not appear the least prospect of French
> supplanting Arabic in Algeria.' In comparing the results of ancient and modern
> methods perhaps he should have taken into account the fact that India and
> Algeria have literatures of their own,
>
> ATS: Not to mention that those in India probably exist in all fourteen of
> the official languages. Certainly they do in Bengali and Urdu as well as
> Hindi. Down south, Tamil has been around a while (long enough to produce
> three descendants: Telegu, Kannada, and Malayalam, as well as modern Tamil),
> and almost certainly has its own literature, plus the classical language from
> which the north Indian languages are descended, Sanskrit, has a substantial
> body of literature, much of it with religious overtones. Brahmins pretty well
> have to know Sanskrit...
>
>
> which most of the outlying peoples subdued by Rome did not have, and these
> literatures may have strengthened the resistance which the tongue of the
> conquered people has offered to that of the conqueror, but, even when
> allowance is made for this fact, the difference in resultant conditions is
> surprising. From its narrow confines, within a little district on the banks of
> the Tiber, covering, at the close of the fifth century B.C., less than a
> hundred square miles, Latin spread through Italy and the islands of the
> Mediterranean, through France, Spain, England, northern Africa, and the
> Danubian provinces, triumphing over all the other tongues of those regions
> more completely than Roman arms triumphed over the peoples using them.
>
> ATS: As Tore Janson (as translated) says, Latin is the world¹s most
> successful language. Now, if we could just get NR citizens to learn it...
>
> In tracing the story we must keep in our mind's eye the linguistic geography
> of Italy, just as we must remember the political geography of the peninsula in
> following Rome's territorial expansion. Let us think at the outset, then, of a
> little strip of flat country on the Tiber, dotted here and there with hills
> crowned with villages. Such hill towns were Rome, Tusculum, and Praeneste, for
> instance. Each of them was the stronghold and market-place of the country
> immediately about it, and therefore had a life of its own, so that although
> Latin was spoken in all of them it varied from one to the other. This is shown
> clearly enough by the inscriptions which have been found on the sites of these
> ancient towns, and as late as the close of the third century before our era,
> Plautus pokes fun in his comedies at the provincialism of Praeneste.
>
> The towns which we have mentioned were only a few miles from Rome. Beyond
> them, and occupying central Italy and a large part of southern Italy, were
> people who spoke Oscan and the other Italic dialects, which were related to
> Latin, and yet quite distinct from it.
>
> ATS: There is a little item called Faliscan, which is the language
> closest to Latin. This text seems to be completely unaware of this language.
> Oscan and Umbrian are more distinct, all right; I¹ve seen some examples
> thereof, having been inflicted with a graduate course on these matters.
>
>
> In the seaports of the south Greek was spoken, while the Messapians and
> Iapygians occupied Calabria. To the north of Rome were the mysterious
> Etruscans and the almost equally puzzling Venetians and Ligurians. When we
> follow the Roman legions across the Alps into Switzerland, France, England,
> Spain, and Africa, we enter a jungle, as it were, of languages and dialects. A
> mere reading of the list of tongues with which Latin was brought into contact,
> if such a list could be drawn up, would bring weariness to the flesh. In the
> part of Gaul conquered by Caesar, for instance, he tells us that there were
> three independent languages, and sixty distinct states, whose peoples
> doubtless differed from one another in their speech. If we look at a map of
> the Roman world under Augustus, with the Atlantic to bound it on the west, the
> Euphrates on the east, the desert of Sahara on the south, and the Rhine and
> Danube on the north, and recall the fact that the linguistic conditions which
> Caesar found in Gaul in 58 B.C. were typical of what confronted Latin in a
> great many of the western, southern, and northern provinces, the fact that
> Latin subdued all these different tongues, and became the every-day speech of
> these different peoples, will be recognized as one of the marvels of history.
> In fact, so firmly did it establish itself, that it withstood the assaults of
> the invading Gothic, Lombardic, Frankish, and Burgundian, and has continued to
> hold to our own day a very large part of the territory which it acquired some
> two thousand years ago.
>
> That Latin was the common speech of the western world is attested not only by
> the fact that the languages of France, Spain, Roumania, and the other Romance
> countries descend from it, but it is also clearly shown by the thousands of
> Latin inscriptions composed by freeman and freedman, by carpenter, baker, and
> soldier, which we find all over the Roman world.
>
> How did this extraordinary result come about? It was not the conquest of the
> world by the common language of Italy, because in Italy in early days at least
> nine different languages were spoken, but its subjugation by the tongue spoken
> in the city of Rome. The traditional narrative of Rome, as Livy and others
> relate it, tells us of a struggle with the neighboring Latin hill towns in the
> early days of the Republic, and the ultimate formation of an alliance between
> them and Rome. The favorable position of the city on the Tiber for trade and
> defence gave it a great advantage over its rivals, and it soon became the
> commercial and political centre of the neighboring territory. The most
> important of these villages, Tusculum, Præneste, and Lanuvium, were not more
> than twenty miles distant, and the people in them must have come constantly to
> Rome to attend the markets, and in later days to vote, to hear political
> speeches, and to listen to plays in the theatre. Some of them probably heard
> the jests at the expense of their dialectal peculiarities which Plautus
> introduced into his comedies.
>
> The younger generations became ashamed of their provincialisms; they imitated
> the Latin spoken in the metropolis, and by the second century of our era, when
> the Latin grammarians have occasion to cite dialectal peculiarities from
> Latium outside Rome, they quote at second-hand from Varro of the first century
> B.C., either because they will not take the trouble to use their own ears or
> because the differences which were noted in earlier days had ceased to exist.
> The first stage in the conquest of the world by the Latin of Rome comes to an
> end, then, with the extension of that form of speech throughout Latium.
>
> Beyond the limits of Latium it came into contact with Oscan and the other
> Italic dialects, which were related to Latin, but of course were much farther
> removed from it than the Latin of Tusculum or Lanuvium had been, so that the
> adoption of Latin was not so simple a matter as the acceptance of Roman Latin
> by the villages of Latium near Rome had been.
>
> The conflict which went on between Latin and its Italic kinsmen is revealed to
> us now and then by a Latin inscription, into which Oscan or Umbrian forms have
> crept. The struggle had come to an end by the beginning of our era. A few
> Oscan inscriptions are found scratched on the walls of Pompeii after the first
> earthquake, in 63 A.D., but they are late survivals, and no Umbrian
> inscriptions are known of a date subsequent to the first century B.C.
>
> The Social War of 90-88 B.C., between Rome and the Italians, was a
> turning-point in the struggle between Latin and the Italic dialects, because
> it marks a change in the political treatment of Rome's dependencies in Italy.
> Up to this time she had followed the policy of isolating all her Italian
> conquered communities from one another. She was anxious to prevent them from
> conspiring against her. Thus, with this object in view, she made differences
> in the rights and privileges granted to neighboring communities, in order
> that, not being subject to the same limitations, and therefore not having the
> same grievances, they might not have a common basis for joint action against
> her. It would naturally be a part of that policy to allow or to encourage the
> retention by the several communities of their own dialects. The common use of
> Latin would have enabled them to combine against her with greater ease. With
> the conclusion of the Social War this policy gave way before the new
> conception of political unity for the people of Italian stock, and with
> political unity came the introduction of Latin as the common tongue in all
> official transactions of a local as well as of a federal character.
>
> The immediate results of the war, and the policy which Rome carried out at its
> close of sending out colonies and building roads in Italy, contributed still
> more to the larger use of Latin throughout the central and southern parts of
> the peninsula. Samnium, Lucania, and the territory of the Bruttii suffered
> severely from depopulation; many colonies were sent into all these districts,
> so that, although the old dialects must have persisted for a time in some of
> the mountain towns to the north of Rome, the years following the conclusion of
> the Social War mark the rapid disappearance of them and the substitution of
> Latin in their place. Campania took little part in the war, and was therefore
> left untouched. This fact accounts probably for the occurrence of a few Oscan
> inscriptions on the walls of Pompeii as late as 63 A.D.
>
> We need not follow here the story of the subjugation of the Greek seaports in
> southern Italy and of the peoples to the north who spoke non-Italic languages.
> In all these cases Latin was brought into conflict with languages not related
> to itself,
>
> ATS: Huh? Last I heard, Greek and Latin had a common ancestor we call
> Indo-European; there are clear relationships between Latin and Greek in
> vocabulary and grammar...though Greek has far more of both than Latin does.
> Latin is a piker when it comes to both vocabulary and grammar. The latter in
> particular may look daunting to an English speaker, but Greek has defeated
> many a fine Latin student. Too, any Celtic languages among those the Romans
> encountered were also related to Latin via Indo-European, and the last I
> heard, some believe that the Celtic languages share a special bond with the
> Italic ones.
>
>
> and the situation contains slightly different elements from those which
> present themselves in the struggle between Latin and the Italic dialects. The
> latter were nearly enough related to Latin to furnish some support for the
> theory that Latin was modified by contact with them, and this theory has found
> advocates,[4] but there is no sufficient reason for believing that it was
> materially influenced. An interesting illustration of the influence of Greek
> on the Latin of every-day life is furnished by the realistic novel which
> Petronius wrote in the middle of the first century of our era. The characters
> in his story are Greeks, and the language which they speak is Latin, but they
> introduce into it a great many Greek words, and now and then a Greek idiom or
> construction." -
>
> ATS: And by then the Latin was becoming quite strange, too.
>
>
> Frank Frost Abbott, The Common People of Ancient Rome (1911)
>
> Valete,
>
> Cato
>
> Vale, et valete.
>
>
>




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 82906 From: Cato Date: 2011-01-27
Subject: a.d. VI Kal. Feb.
Cato omnibus in foro SPD

Hodiernus dies est ante diem VI Kalendas Februarius; haec dies comitialis est.


"After Domitian, the Romans appointed Nerva Cocceius emperor. Because
of the hatred felt for Domitian, his images, many of which were of
silver and many of gold, were melted down; and from this source large
amounts of money were obtained. The arches, too, of which a very great
number were being erected to this one man, were torn down. Nerva also
released all who were on trial for maiestas and restored the exiles;
moreover, he put to death all the slaves and the freedmen who had
conspired against their masters and allowed that class of persons to
lodge no complaint anybody of maiestas or of adopting the Jewish mode
of life. Many of those who had been informed were condemned to death,
among others Seras, the philosopher. When, now, no little commotion
was occasioned by the fact that everybody was accusing everybody else,
Fronto, the consul, is said to have remarked that it was bad to have
an emperor under whom nobody was permitted to do anything, but worse
to have one under whom everybody was permitted to do everything; and
Nerva, on hearing this, ordered that this condition of affairs should
cease for the future. Now Nerva was so old and so feeble in health (he
always, for instance, had to vomit up his food) that he was rather
weak. He also forbade the making of gold or silver statues in his
honour. To those who had been deprived of their property without cause
under Domitian he gave back all that was still to be found in the
imperial treasury. To the very poor Romans he granted allotments of
land worth 60,000,000 sesterces, putting some senators in charge of
their purchase and distribution. When he ran short of funds, he sold
much wearing apparel and many vessels of silver and gold, besides
furniture, both his own and that which belonged to the imperial
residence, and many estates and houses — in fact, everything except
what was indispensable. He did not, however, haggle over the price,
but in this very matter benefitted many persons. He abolished many
sacrifices, many horse-races, and some other spectacles, in an attempt
to reduce expenditures as far as possible. In the senate he took oath
that he would not slay any of the senators, and he kept his pledge in
spite of plots against himself. Moreover, he did nothing without the
advice of the foremost men. Among his various laws were those
prohibiting the castration of any man, and the marriage by any man of
his own niece. When consul he did not hesitate to take as his
colleague Virginius Rufus, though this man had often been saluted as
emperor. After Rufus' death an inscription was placed on his tomb to
the effect that, after conquering Vindex, he had claimed the power,
not for himself, but for his country.

Nerva ruled so well that he once remarked: 'I have done nothing that
would prevent my laying down the imperial office and returning to
private life in safety.' When Calpurnius Crassus, a descendant of the
famous Crassi, had formed a plot with some others against him, he
caused them to sit besides him at a spectacle (they were still
ignorant of the fact that they had been informed upon) and gave them
swords, ostensibly to inspect and see if they were sharp (as was often
done), but really in order to show that he did not care even if he
died then and there." - Dio Cassius, "Roman History" LXVIII.1-3


After Domitian's assassination in AD 96 following his reign of terror,
Nerva was elevated to emperor on 18 September. The Fasti Ostienses,
the Ostian Calendar, records "Fourteenth day before Kalends of
October: Domitian killed. On the same day, Marcus Cocceius Nerva
proclaimed emperor." According to Cassius Dio he was approached by the
conspirators against Domitian because he was elderly (61) and
childless - that is, a safe pair of hands. This also had the effect of
saving his own life, which was under threat from Domitian.

After his accession, Nerva went to set a new tone: he released those
imprisoned for treason, banned future prosecutions for treason,
granted amnesty to many whom Domitian had exiled, restored much
confiscated property, and involved the Roman Senate in his rule. He
probably did so as a means to remain relatively popular (and therefore
alive), but this did not completely aid him. Support for Domitian in
the army remained strong, and in October 97 the Praetorian Guard laid
siege to the Imperial Palace on the Palatine Hill and took Nerva
hostage. He was forced to submit to their demands, agreeing to hand
over those responsible for Domitian's death and even giving a speech
thanking the rebellious Praetorians. Petronius and Parthenius, blamed
by the Praetorians for Domitian's death, were killed. Nerva was
unharmed in this assault, but his authority was damaged beyond repair.
He had no natural children, but found salvation in the idea of
adopting someone who would have the support of both the army and the
people. He adopted Trajan, a commander of the armies on the German
frontier, as his successor shortly thereafter in order to bolster his
own rule. Casperius Aelianus, the Guard Prefect responsible for the
mutiny against Nerva, was later executed under Trajan.

The Epitome de Caesaribus reports that Nerva was struck by a fever and
chills and died shortly afterward, on 27 January 98; Jerome places
his death in the Gardens of Sallust in Rome (originally developed by
the historian Sallust). He was deified by the Senate shortly
afterward, and his ashes were laid to rest in the Mausoleum of
Augustus. On the day of his burial there was a solar eclipse.

Valete bene!

Cato
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 82907 From: Cato Date: 2011-01-27
Subject: HOW LATIN BECAME THE LANGUAGE OF THE WORLD, PART II
Cato omnibus in foro SPD

"The Romans, as is well known, used two agencies with great effect in Romanizing their newly acquired territory, viz., colonies and roads. The policy of sending out colonists to hold the new districts was definitely entered upon in the early part of the fourth century, when citizens were sent to Antium, Tarracina, and other points in Latium. Within this century fifteen or twenty colonies were established at various points in central Italy. Strategic considerations determined their location, and the choice was made with great wisdom. Sutrium and Nepete, on the borders of the Ciminian forest, were "the gates of Etruria"; Fregellæ and Interamna commanded the passage of the river Liris; Tarentum and Rhegium were important ports of entry, while Alba Fucens and Carsioli guarded the line of the Valerian road.

This road and the other great highways which were constructed in Italy brought not only all the colonies, but all parts of the peninsula, into easy communication with the capital. The earliest of them was built to Capua, as we know, by the great censor Appius Claudius, in 312 B.C., and when one looks at a map of Italy at the close of the third century before our era, and sees the central and southern parts of the peninsula dotted with colonies, the Appian Way running from Rome south-east to Brundisium, the Popillian Way to Rhegium, the Flaminian Way north-east to Ariminum, with an extension to Cremona, with the Cassian and Aurelian ways along the western coast, the rapidity and the completeness with which the Latin language overspread Italy ceases to be a mystery. A map of Spain or of France under the Empire, with its network of roads, is equally illuminating.

The missionaries who carried Roman law, Roman dress, Roman ideas, and the Latin language first through central, southern, and northern Italy, and then to the East and the West, were the colonist, the merchant, the soldier, and the federal official. The central government exempted the Roman citizen who settled in a provincial town from the local taxes. As these were very heavy, his advantage over the native was correspondingly great, and in almost all the large towns in the Empire we find evidence of the existence of large guilds of Roman traders, tax-collectors, bankers, and land-owners. When Trajan in his romantic eastern campaign had penetrated to Ctesiphon, the capital of Parthia, he found Roman merchants already settled there. Besides the merchants and capitalists who were engaged in business on their own account in the provinces, there were thousands of agents for the great Roman corporations scattered through the Empire. Rome was the money centre of the world, and the great stock companies organized to lend money, construct public works, collect taxes, and engage in the shipping trade had their central offices in the capital whence they sent out their representatives to all parts of the world.

The soldier played as important a part as the merchant in extending the use of Latin. Tacitus tells us that in the reign of Augustus there were twenty-five legions stationed in the provinces. If we allow 6,000 men to a legion, we should have a total of 150,000 Roman soldiers scattered through the provinces. To these must be added the auxiliary troops which were made up of natives who, at the close of their term of service, were probably able to speak Latin, and when they settled among their own people again, would carry a knowledge of it into ever-widening circles. We have no exact knowledge of the number of the auxiliary troops, but they probably came to be as numerous as the legionaries. Soldiers stationed on the frontiers frequently married native women at the end of their term of service, passed the rest of their lives in the provinces, and their children learned Latin.

The direct influence of the government was no small factor in developing the use of Latin, which was of course the official language of the Empire. All court proceedings were carried on in Latin. It was the language of the governor, the petty official, and the tax-gatherer. It was used in laws and proclamations, and no native could aspire to a post in the civil service unless he had mastered it. It was regarded sometimes at least as a sine qua non of the much-coveted Roman citizenship. The Emperor Claudius, for instance, cancelled the Roman citizenship of a Greek, because he had addressed a letter to him in Latin which he could not understand. The tradition that Latin was the official language of the world was taken up by the Christian church. Even when Constantine presided over the Council at Nicæa in the East, he addressed the assembly in Latin.

The two last-mentioned agencies, the Latin of the Roman official and the Latin of the church, were the influences which made the language spoken throughout the Empire essentially uniform in its character. Had the Latin which the colonist, the merchant, and the soldier carried through Italy and into the provinces been allowed to develop in different localities without any external unifying influence, probably new dialects would have grown up all over the world, or, to put it in another way, probably the Romance languages would have come into existence several centuries before they actually appeared. That unifying influence was the Latin used by the officials sent out from Rome, which all classes eagerly strove to imitate. Naturally the language of the provinces did not conform in all respects to the Roman standard. Apuleius, for instance, is aware of the fact that his African style and diction are likely to offend his Roman readers, and in the introduction to his Metamorphoses he begs for their indulgence. The elder Seneca in his Controversiae remarks of a Spanish fellow-countryman "that he could never unlearn that well-known style which is brusque and rustic and characteristic of Spain," and Spartianus in his Life of Hadrian tells us that when Hadrian addressed the senate on a certain occasion, his rustic pronunciation excited the laughter of the senators. But the peculiarities in the diction of Apuleius and Hadrian seem to have been those which only a cultivated man of the world would notice. They do not appear to have been fundamental. In a similar way the careful studies which have been made of the thousands of inscriptions found in the West, dedicatory inscriptions, guild records, and epitaphs show us that the language of the common people in the provinces did not differ materially from that spoken in Italy. It was the language of the Roman soldier, colonist, and trader, with common characteristics in the way of diction, form, phraseology, and syntax, dropping into some slight local peculiarities, but kept essentially a unit by the desire which each community felt to imitate its officials and its upper classes.

The one part of the Roman world in which Latin did not gain an undisputed pre-eminence was the Greek East. The Romans freely recognized the peculiar position which Greek was destined to hold in that part of the Empire, and styled it the altera lingua. Even in Greek lands, however, Latin gained a strong hold, and exerted considerable influence on Greek.

In a very thoughtful paper on "Language-Rivalry and Speech-Differentiation in the Case of Race-Mixture," Professor Hempl has discussed the conditions under which language-rivalry takes place, and states the results that follow. His conclusions have an interesting bearing on the question which we are discussing here, how and why it was that Latin supplanted the other languages with which it was brought into contact.

He observes that when two languages are brought into conflict, there is rarely a compromise or fusion, but one of the two is driven out of the field altogether by the other. On analyzing the circumstances in which such a struggle for supremacy between languages springs up, he finds four characteristic cases. Sometimes the armies of one nation, though comparatively small in numbers, conquer another country. They seize the government of the conquered land; their ruler becomes its king, and they become the aristocracy. They constitute a minority, however; they identify their interests with those of the conquered people, and the language of the subject people becomes the language of all classes. The second case arises when a country is conquered by a foreign people who pour into it with their wives and children through a long period and settle permanently there. The speech of the natives in these circumstances disappears. In the third case a more powerful people conquers a country, establishes a dependent government in it, sends out merchants, colonists, and officials, and establishes new towns. If such a province is held long enough, the language of the conqueror prevails. In the fourth and last case peaceful bands of immigrants enter a country to follow the humbler callings. They are scattered among the natives, and succeed in proportion as they learn the language of their adopted country. For their children and grandchildren this language becomes their mother tongue, and the speech of the invaded nation holds its ground.

The first typical case is illustrated by the history of Norman-French in England, the second by that of the European colonists in America; the Latinization of Spain, Gaul, and other Roman provinces furnishes an instance of the third, and our own experience with European immigrants is a case of the fourth characteristic situation. The third typical case of language-conflict is the one with which we are concerned here, and the analysis which we have made of the practices followed by the Romans in occupying newly acquired territory, both in Italy and outside the peninsula, shows us how closely they conform to the typical situation. With the exception of Dacia, all the provinces were held by the Romans for several centuries, so that their history under Roman rule satisfies the condition of long occupation which Professor Hempl lays down as a necessary one. Dacia which lay north of the Danube, and was thus far removed from the centres of Roman influence, was erected into a province in 107 A.D., and abandoned in 270. Notwithstanding its remoteness and the comparatively short period during which it was occupied, the Latin language has continued in use in that region to the present day. It furnishes therefore a striking illustration of the effective methods which the Romans used in Latinizing conquered territory.

We have already had occasion to notice that a fusion between Latin and the languages with which it was brought into contact, such a fusion, for instance, as we find in Pidgin-English, did not occur. These languages influenced Latin only by way of making additions to its vocabulary. A great many Greek scientific and technical terms were adopted by the learned during the period of Roman supremacy. Of this one is clearly aware, for instance, in reading the philosophical and rhetorical works of Cicero. A few words, like rufus, crept into the language from the Italic dialects. Now and then the Keltic or Iberian names of Gallic or Spanish articles were taken up, but the inflectional system and the syntax of Latin retained their integrity. In the post-Roman period additions to the vocabulary are more significant. It is said that about three hundred Germanic words have found their way into all the Romance languages.[11] The language of the province of Gaul was most affected since some four hundred and fifty Gothic, Lombardic, and Burgundian words are found in French alone, such words as boulevard, homard, and blesser. Each of the provinces of course, when the Empire broke up, was subjected to influences peculiar to itself. The residence of the Moors in Spain, for seven hundred years, for instance, has left a deep impress on the Spanish vocabulary, while the geographic position of Roumanian has exposed it to the influence of Slavic, Albanian, Greek, Magyar, and Turkish.[12] A sketch of the history of Latin after the breaking up of the Empire carries us beyond the limits of the question which we set ourselves at the beginning and out of the domain of the Latinist, but it may not be out of place to gather together here a few of the facts which the Romance philologist has contributed to its later history, because the life of Latin has been continuous from the foundation of the city of Rome to the present day.

In this later period the question of paramount interest is, why did Latin in one part of the world develop into French, in another part into Italian, in another into Spanish? One answer to this question has been based on chronological grounds.[13] The Roman soldiers and traders who went out to garrison and to settle in a newly acquired territory, introduced that form of Latin which was in use in Italy at the time of their departure from the peninsula. The form of speech thus planted there developed along lines peculiar to itself, became the dialect of that province, and ultimately the (Romance) language spoken in that part of Europe. Sardinia was conquered in 241 B.C., and Sardinian therefore is a development of the Latin spoken in Italy in the middle of the third century B.C., that is of the Latin of Livius Andronicus. Spain was brought under Roman rule in 197 B.C., and consequently Spanish is a natural outgrowth of popular Latin of the time of Plautus. In a similar way, by noticing the date at which the several provinces were established down to the acquisition of Dacia in 107 A.D., we shall understand how it was that the several Romance languages developed out of Latin. So long as the Empire held together the unifying influence of official Latin, and the constant intercommunication between the provinces, preserved the essential unity of Latin throughout the world, but when the bonds were broken, the naturally divergent tendencies which had existed from the beginning, but had been held in check, made themselves felt, and the speech of the several sections of the Old World developed into the languages which we find in them to-day.

This theory is suggestive, and leads to several important results, but it is open to serious criticism, and does not furnish a sufficient explanation. It does not seem to take into account the steady stream of emigrants from Italy to the provinces, and the constant transfer of troops from one part of the world to another of which we become aware when we study the history of any single province or legion. Spain was acquired, it is true, in 197 B.C., and the Latin which was first introduced into it was the Latin of Plautus, but the subjugation of the country occupied more than sixty years, and during this period fresh troops were steadily poured into the peninsula, and later on there was frequently an interchange of legions between Spain and the other provinces. Furthermore, new communities of Roman citizens were established there even down into the Empire, and traders were steadily moving into the province. In this way it would seem that the Latin of the early second century which was originally carried into Spain must have been constantly undergoing modification, and, so far as this influence goes, made approximately like the Latin spoken elsewhere in the Empire.

A more satisfactory explanation seems to be that first clearly propounded by the Italian philologist, Ascoli. His reasoning is that when we acquire a foreign language we find it very difficult, and often impossible, to master some of the new sounds. Our ears do not catch them exactly, or we unconsciously substitute for the foreign sound some sound from our own language. Our vocal organs, too, do not adapt themselves readily to the reproduction of the strange sounds in another tongue, as we know from the difficulty which we have in pronouncing the French nasal or the German guttural. Similarly English differs somewhat as it is spoken by a Frenchman, a German, and an Italian. The Frenchman has a tendency to import the nasal into it, and he is also inclined to pronounce it like his own language, while the German favors the guttural. In a paper on the teaching of modern languages in our schools, Professor Grandgent says: "Usually there is no attempt made to teach any French sounds but u and the four nasal vowels; all the rest are unquestioningly replaced by the English vowels and consonants that most nearly resemble them." The substitution of sounds from one's own language in speaking a foreign tongue, and the changes in voice-inflection, are more numerous and more marked if the man who learns the new language is uneducated and acquires it in casual intercourse from an uneducated man who speaks carelessly." - Frank Frost Abbott "The Common People of Ancient Rome"

Valete bene!

Cato
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 82908 From: q.fabius_labeo Date: 2011-01-27
Subject: Re: Latin Help
Q. Fabius Labeo A. Tulliae Scholasticae omnibusque s.p.d.


--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "A. Tullia Scholastica" <fororom@...> wrote:
>
>> We have little choice. The two second person pronouns merged (or as linguists say, collapsed) a couple or three centuries ago. They survive in prayers, but most people do not know the difference between thee and thou and thy and thine, to say nothing of ye. 'Your' survives, so that is understood.<<

QFL: Always interesting to me that the use of Thee and Thou continued until fairly recent times among the Quakers. My maternal grandmother's family were Quakers, and I recall hearing Thee and Thou a lot as a child (my childhood may be approaching ancient history, but it was during this century!). They're still heard occasionally in this context, but even in this limited usage, I believe it's all but disappeared.



>> It's because it is very immodest; it shucked almost all of its inherited Germanic grammar, and runs around minus its grammatical clothing.<<

QFL: I love this! This may be the best description of the English language I've ever read.

Curate ut valeatis
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 82909 From: os390account Date: 2011-01-27
Subject: Re: Latin Help
The Quakers still use it on occasion, but the grammar has become ergative. They use the object for the subject when using these pronouns, e.g. Thee is happy. (Should be: Thou art happy.) And no, it is not a result of an eclipsed dative (indirect object), such as "To thee is happiness," which would be proper, actually.

Many people still use possessive adjectives rather than pronouns, do to an attachment to a false archaism created back in the incunabula days of printing, e.g. Mine eyes art blue. (Should be: My eyes are blue.)

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "q.fabius_labeo" <q.fabius_labeo@...> wrote:
>
> Q. Fabius Labeo A. Tulliae Scholasticae omnibusque s.p.d.
>
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "A. Tullia Scholastica" <fororom@> wrote:
> >
> >> We have little choice. The two second person pronouns merged (or as linguists say, collapsed) a couple or three centuries ago. They survive in prayers, but most people do not know the difference between thee and thou and thy and thine, to say nothing of ye. 'Your' survives, so that is understood.<<
>
> QFL: Always interesting to me that the use of Thee and Thou continued until fairly recent times among the Quakers. My maternal grandmother's family were Quakers, and I recall hearing Thee and Thou a lot as a child (my childhood may be approaching ancient history, but it was during this century!). They're still heard occasionally in this context, but even in this limited usage, I believe it's all but disappeared.
>
>
>
> >> It's because it is very immodest; it shucked almost all of its inherited Germanic grammar, and runs around minus its grammatical clothing.<<
>
> QFL: I love this! This may be the best description of the English language I've ever read.
>
> Curate ut valeatis
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 82910 From: q.fabius_labeo Date: 2011-01-27
Subject: Re: Latin Help
--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "os390account" <Velaki@...> wrote:
>
> The Quakers still use it on occasion, but the grammar has become ergative. They use the object for the subject when using these pronouns, e.g. Thee is happy. (Should be: Thou art happy.) And no, it is not a result of an eclipsed dative (indirect object), such as "To thee is happiness," which would be proper, actually.
>
> Many people still use possessive adjectives rather than pronouns, do to an attachment to a false archaism created back in the incunabula days of printing, e.g. Mine eyes art blue. (Should be: My eyes are blue.)


Salve, Velaki!
Hmmm, that's very interesting. My grandmother would've said, "Thou art happy," but never "Thee is happy." But, that was many years ago. Maybe current usage has changed. None of my living relatives are Quaker (to my knowledge, anyhow), and I haven't been to a Quaker Meeting since I was a child. Thanks for this interesting info.
Vale!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 82911 From: L. Lucretius Caupo Date: 2011-01-27
Subject: Re: Latin Help
Caupo omnibus in foro S.P.D.



It always amuses my that most Americans consider thou, thee and thy to be
the 'respectful' pronouns in old English and you as the more intimate form,
whereas the truth is the exact opposite. I remember doing a little informal
survey for my thesis, and discovered that every single person I interviewed
held that view. Why? "Because it's Biblical language," most of them said.
They were surprised to learn that in old English you addressed intimate
friends as 'thou,' but superiors as 'you' (The same as Latin tu, te and
tibi, of course, along with the appropriate Latin conjugations of the verb
which had their corresponding forms in English, e.g. thou goest, but he
goeth ... etc.).



It is also my understanding that the complicated British class structure was
the single biggest factor contributing to the demise of thou etc.-before you
were able to address anyone, you first had to ascertain what their social
position was in relation to your own, because god forbid that you selected a
disrespectful pronoun! Eventually the easiest approach was to use the
respectful you for everyone, then you were covered! Regrettably, you served
for both singular and plural (similar to vous in contemporary French), hence
the absence of a distinction in modern English!



Oh, the quirks of English ...!



Salvete,



L. LVCRETIVS CAVPO







[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 82912 From: q.fabius_labeo Date: 2011-01-27
Subject: Re: Latin Help
--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "L. Lucretius Caupo" <caupo@...> wrote:
>
> Caupo omnibus in foro S.P.D.
>
>
>
> It always amuses my that most Americans consider thou, thee and thy to be
> the 'respectful' pronouns in old English and you as the more intimate form,
> whereas the truth is the exact opposite. I remember doing a little informal
> survey for my thesis, and discovered that every single person I interviewed
> held that view. Why? "Because it's Biblical language," most of them said.
> They were surprised to learn that in old English you addressed intimate
> friends as 'thou,' but superiors as 'you' (The same as Latin tu, te and
> tibi, of course, along with the appropriate Latin conjugations of the verb
> which had their corresponding forms in English, e.g. thou goest, but he
> goeth ... etc.).
>
>
>
> It is also my understanding that the complicated British class structure was
> the single biggest factor contributing to the demise of thou etc.-before you
> were able to address anyone, you first had to ascertain what their social
> position was in relation to your own, because god forbid that you selected a
> disrespectful pronoun! Eventually the easiest approach was to use the
> respectful you for everyone, then you were covered! Regrettably, you served
> for both singular and plural (similar to vous in contemporary French), hence
> the absence of a distinction in modern English!
>
>
>
> Oh, the quirks of English ...!
>
>
>
> Salvete,
>
>
>
> L. LVCRETIVS CAVPO



Salve, Caupo!

Which was exactly Geo. Fox's and the Quakers' point ...no one is above anyone else, so they addressed everyone with Thou and Thee. Hmmm, now I'm curious. Is there a formal and a familiar "you" in Latin. I was under the impression there was only the distinction of singular or plural, based on number but not social rank.

Bene vale!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 82913 From: Gaius Lucretius Seneca Date: 2011-01-27
Subject: Re: Latin Help
C. Lucretius Seneca Q. Fabio Labeo omnibusque S.P.D.

On 1/27/2011 8:40 AM, q.fabius_labeo wrote:
> QFL: Always interesting to me that the use of Thee and Thou continued
> until fairly recent times among the Quakers. My maternal grandmother's
> family were Quakers, and I recall hearing Thee and Thou a lot as a
> child (my childhood may be approaching ancient history, but it was
> during this century!). They're still heard occasionally in this
> context, but even in this limited usage, I believe it's all but
> disappeared.

I'm also a descendant of Quakers, going back at least ten generations.
I'm not sure when they gave up "plain speaking", though, but it must
have been before my great grandfather's time. His grandfather, my
great-great-great-grandfather, was an inventor, author, and preacher,
and I have some of his writings, though they lack any use of second
person pronouns. He did, however, patent something called "the railroad
skate". You'd wear the skate on one foot, and the skate had wheels
designed to fit a railroad rail. There was a pole accessory with a
second skate for the other rail, to help keep your balance I guess.
You'd push yourself along with your other foot, holding onto the pole
for balance, and watch out for trains. It was not a commercial success.

http://www.google.com/patents/about?id=sQNGAAAAEBAJ

Vale et valete!
Seneca
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 82914 From: Gaius Lucretius Seneca Date: 2011-01-27
Subject: Re: Latin Help
Salve, fellow Lucreti :)

On 1/27/2011 1:04 PM, L. Lucretius Caupo wrote:
> It is also my understanding that the complicated British class
> structure was
> the single biggest factor contributing to the demise of thou
> etc.-before you
> were able to address anyone, you first had to ascertain what their social
> position was in relation to your own, because god forbid that you
> selected a
> disrespectful pronoun!

Apparently in the trial of Sir Walter Raleigh it was used as an insult
by the prosecution to Raleigh: "I thou thee, thou traitor!" Ooh BURN!!

Vale et valete
Seneca
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 82915 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2011-01-27
Subject: Re: Latin Help
>
>
> A. Tullia Scholastica Q. Fabio Labeoni quiritibus bonae voluntatis S.P.D.
>
>
> Q. Fabius Labeo A. Tulliae Scholasticae omnibusque s.p.d.
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com <mailto:Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com> , "A.
> Tullia Scholastica" <fororom@...> wrote:
>> >
>>> >> We have little choice. The two second person pronouns merged (or as
>>> linguists say, collapsed) a couple or three centuries ago. They survive in
>>> prayers, but most people do not know the difference between thee and thou
>>> and thy and thine, to say nothing of ye. 'Your' survives, so that is
>>> understood.<<
>
> QFL: Always interesting to me that the use of Thee and Thou continued until
> fairly recent times among the Quakers. My maternal grandmother's family were
> Quakers, and I recall hearing Thee and Thou a lot as a child (my childhood may
> be approaching ancient history, but it was during this century!). They're
> still heard occasionally in this context, but even in this limited usage, I
> believe it's all but disappeared.
>
> ATS: I have recently discovered that some of my paternal relatives were
> evidently Quakers, but that was many, many generations ago. There are 19 of
> them (generations, that is) in my pedigree.
>
>>> >> It's because it is very immodest; it shucked almost all of its inherited
>>> Germanic grammar, and runs around minus its grammatical clothing.<<
>
> QFL: I love this! This may be the best description of the English language
> I've ever read.
>
> ATS: Thank you! I use these little tidbits to keep my Grammatica
> students entertained...and to explain why English speakers have so much
> trouble with highly-inflected languages such as Latin. Latin words are in
> purdah by comparison with English ones. They NEVER go out in public without
> some grammatical clothing, be it an object with a preposition, an ending with
> an adverb, case endings with substantives, personal endings and tense markers
> with verbs...
>
> Curate ut valeatis
>
> Et tu!
>
>
>




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 82916 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2011-01-27
Subject: Re: Latin Help
> A. Tullia Scholastica L. Lucretio Cauponi quiritibus bonae voluntatis S.P.D.
>
> It sure is nice to discuss these intellectual matters here...
>
>
>
>
> Caupo omnibus in foro S.P.D.
>
> It always amuses my that most Americans consider thou, thee and thy to be
> the 'respectful' pronouns in old English and you as the more intimate form,
> whereas the truth is the exact opposite. I remember doing a little informal
> survey for my thesis, and discovered that every single person I interviewed
> held that view. Why? "Because it's Biblical language," most of them said.
> They were surprised to learn that in old English you addressed intimate
> friends as 'thou,' but superiors as 'you'
>
> ATS: Strictly speaking, Old English is a much more ancient stage of the
> development of the English language, that recorded in Beowulf...which is so
> different from modern English that a knowledge of German is highly recommended
> before attempting to learn Old English. Shakespeare wrote what is termed
> early Modern English, and the collapse of the second person pronoun occurred
> after his time.
>
>
> (The same as Latin tu, te and
> tibi, of course, along with the appropriate Latin conjugations of the verb
> which had their corresponding forms in English, e.g. thou goest, but he
> goeth ... etc.).
>
> ATS: This is incorrect with regard to Latin. Latin does not distinguish
> the singular and plural of the second person pronoun according to rank or
> familiarity, something we occasionally have to clarify for our students.
> These are simply applied on the basis of number: one person is addressed in
> the singular, and more than one is addressed in the plural. The same is true
> for classical Greek, and if memory serves, Sanskrit. Now French, Spanish, and
> German have these distinctions based on social status, and the latter has a
> set of forms specific to the familiar plural (used to address inferiors, inter
> alios). I don¹t know about Italian or Portuguese, but perhaps these languages
> also have that distinction. Their mother, however, didn¹t teach them such
> things; Mama Latina had no such distinctions in her repertoire.
>
>
> It is also my understanding that the complicated British class structure was
> the single biggest factor contributing to the demise of thou etc.-before you
> were able to address anyone, you first had to ascertain what their social
> position was in relation to your own, because god forbid that you selected a
> disrespectful pronoun! Eventually the easiest approach was to use the
> respectful you for everyone, then you were covered! Regrettably, you served
> for both singular and plural (similar to vous in contemporary French),
>
> ATS: And Usted in Spanish...Sie in German...but the familiar forms also
> exist.
>
>
> hence
> the absence of a distinction in modern English!
>
> Oh, the quirks of English ...!
>
> ATS: It has many. The collapse of the second person pronoun is one of
> them, and one which has occurred in comparatively recent times. Not being an
> expert on the history of English (or on sociology), I wouldn¹t venture to say
> that the social class structure contributed to this linguistic loss, but it
> may at least have contributed, although the process seems to have been
> underway well before the more extreme development of social stratification we
> associate with the last couple of centuries in British history.
>
> Salvete,
>
> L. LVCRETIVS CAVPO
>
> Vale, et valete.
>
>




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 82917 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2011-01-27
Subject: Re: Latin Help
>
>
> A. Tullia Scholastica Q. Fabio Labeoni quiritibus bonae voluntatis S.P.D.
>
> My comments below, with those of QFL.
>
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com <mailto:Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com> , "L.
> Lucretius Caupo" <caupo@...> wrote:
>> >
>> > Caupo omnibus in foro S.P.D.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > It always amuses my that most Americans consider thou, thee and thy to be
>> > the 'respectful' pronouns in old English and you as the more intimate form,
>> > whereas the truth is the exact opposite. I remember doing a little informal
>> > survey for my thesis, and discovered that every single person I interviewed
>> > held that view. Why? "Because it's Biblical language," most of them said.
>> > They were surprised to learn that in old English you addressed intimate
>> > friends as 'thou,' but superiors as 'you' (The same as Latin tu, te and
>> > tibi, of course, along with the appropriate Latin conjugations of the verb
>> > which had their corresponding forms in English, e.g. thou goest, but he
>> > goeth ... etc.).
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > It is also my understanding that the complicated British class structure >>
was
>> > the single biggest factor contributing to the demise of thou etc.-before >>
you
>> > were able to address anyone, you first had to ascertain what their social
>> > position was in relation to your own, because god forbid that you selected
a
>> > disrespectful pronoun! Eventually the easiest approach was to use the
>> > respectful you for everyone, then you were covered! Regrettably, you served
>> > for both singular and plural (similar to vous in contemporary French),
>> hence
>> > the absence of a distinction in modern English!
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > Oh, the quirks of English ...!
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > Salvete,
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > L. LVCRETIVS CAVPO
>
> Salve, Caupo!
>
> Which was exactly Geo. Fox's and the Quakers' point ...no one is above anyone
> else, so they addressed everyone with Thou and Thee. Hmmm, now I'm curious.
> Is there a formal and a familiar "you" in Latin. I was under the impression
> there was only the distinction of singular or plural, based on number but not
> social rank.
>
> ATS: There is no separate formal and familiar you in Latin. It is simply
> based on number, not social rank. The Romans were big on marking social rank
> with distinctions in clothing, however (visual rather than auditory). The
> angusti clavi, lati clavi, toga praetexta, toga trabea, senatorial ring,
> stola, etc., etc. signaled the rank of the wearer, much like rank insignia in
> the modern military. They did not lack for auditory distinctions
> (provincialisms, etc.), but the pronouns do not seem to have been involved in
> this at all.
>
> Bene vale!
>
> Et tu!
>
>
>




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 82919 From: Cato Date: 2011-01-28
Subject: a.d. V Kal. Feb.
Cato omnibus in foro SPD

Hodiernus dies est ante diem V Kalendas Februarius; haec dies comitialis est.

"The [Vestal] virgins who serve the goddess were originally four and
were chosen by the kings according to the principles established by
Numa, but afterwards, from the multiplicity of the sacred rites they
perform, their number was increased of six, and has so remained down
to our time. They live in the temple of the goddess, into which none
who wish are hindered from entering in the daytime, whereas it is not
lawful for any man to remain there at night. They were required to
remain undefiled by marriage for the space of thirty years, devoting
themselves to offering sacrifices and performing the other rites
ordained by law. During the first ten years their duty was to learn
their functions, in the second ten to perform them, and during the
remaining ten to teach others. After the expiration of the term of
thirty years nothing hindered those who so desired from marrying, upon
laying aside their fillets and the other insignia of their priesthood.
And some, though very few, have done this; but they came to ends that
were not at all happy or enviable. In consequence, the rest, looking
upon their misfortunes as ominous, remain virgins in the temple of the
goddess till their death, and then once more another is chosen by the
pontiffs to supply the vacancy. Many high honours have been granted
them by the commonwealth, as a result of which they feel no desire
either for marriage or for children; and severe penalties have been
established for their misdeeds. It is the pontiffs who by law both
inquire into and punish these offences; to Vestals who are guilty of
lesser misdemeanours they scourge with rods, but those who have
suffered defilement they deliver up to the most shameful and the most
miserable death. While they are yet alive they are carried upon a
bier with all the formality of a funeral, their friends and relations
attending them with lamentations, and after being brought as far as
the Colline Gate, they are placed in an underground cell prepared
within the walls, clad in their funeral attire; but they are not given
a monument or funeral rites or any other customary solemnities. There
are many indications, it seems, when a priestess is not performing her
holy functions with purity, but the principal one is the extinction of
the fire, which the Romans dread above all misfortunes, looking upon
it, from whatever cause it proceeds, as an omen that portends the
destruction of the city; and they bring fire again into the temple
with many supplicatory rites, concerning which I shall speak on the
proper occasion.

However, it is also well worth relating in what manner the goddess has
manifested herself in favour of those virgins who have been falsely
accused. For these things, however incredible they may be, have been
believed by the Romans and their historians have related much about
them. To be sure, the professors of the atheistic philosophies, — if,
indeed, their theories deserve the name of philosophy, — who ridicule
all the manifestations of the gods which have taken place among either
the Greeks or barbarians, will also laugh these reports to scorn and
attribute them to human imposture, on the ground that none of the gods
concern themselves in anything relating to mankind. Those, however,
who do not absolve the gods from the care of human affairs, but, after
looking deeply into history, hold that they are favourable to the good
and hostile to the wicked, will not regard even these manifestations
as incredible. It is said, then, that once, when the fire had been
extinguished through some negligence on the part of Aemilia, who had
the care of it at the time and had entrusted it to another virgin, one
of those who had been newly chosen and were then learning their
duties, the whole city was in great commotion and an inquiry was made
by the pontiffs whether there might not have been some defilement of
the priestess to account for the extinction of the fire. Thereupon,
they say, Aemilia, who was innocent, but distracted at what had
happened, stretched out her hands toward the altar and in the presence
of the priests and the rest of the virgins cried: 'O Vesta, guardian
of the Romans' city, if, during the space of nearly thirty years, I
have performed the sacred offices to thee in a holy and proper manner,
keeping a pure mind and a chaste body, do thou manifest thyself in my
defence and assist me and do not suffer they priestess to die the most
miserable of all deaths; but if I have been guilty of any impious
deed, let my punishment expiate the guilt of the city.' Having said
this, she tore off the band of the linen garment she had on and threw
it upon the altar, they say, following her prayer; and from the ashes,
which had been long cold and retained no spark, a great flame flared
up through the linen, so that the city no longer required either
expiations or a new fire." - Dionysius of Halicarnassus, "Roman
Antiquities" 2.67-68

Valete bene!

Cato
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 82920 From: Cato Date: 2011-01-28
Subject: HOW LATIN BECAME THE LANGUAGE OF THE WORLD - PART III
Cato omnibus in foro SPD

"This was the state of things in the Roman provinces of southern Europe when the Goths, Lombards, and other peoples from the North gradually crossed the frontier and settled in the territory of Latin-speaking peoples. In the sixth century, for instance, the Lombards in Italy, the Franks in France, and the Visigoths in Spain would each give to the Latin which they spoke a twist peculiar to themselves, and out of the one Latin came Italian, out of the second, the language of France, and out of the third, Spanish. This initial impulse toward the development of Latin along different lines in Italy, France, and Spain was, of course, reinforced by differences in climate, in the temperaments of the three peoples, in their modes of life, and in their political and social experiences. These centrifugal forces, so to speak, became effective because the political and social bonds which had held Italy, France, and Spain together were now loosened, and consequently communication between the provinces was less frequent, and the standardizing influence of the official Latin of Rome ceased to keep Latin a uniform thing throughout the Empire.

One naturally asks why Latin survived at all, why the languages of the victorious Germanic peoples gave way to it. In reply to this question it is commonly said that the fittest survived, that the superiority of Roman civilization and of the Latin language gave Latin the victory. So far as this factor is to be taken into account, I should prefer to say that it was not so much the superiority of Latin, although that may be freely recognized, as it was the sentimental respect which the Germans and their leaders had for the Empire and for all its institutions. This is shown clearly enough, for instance, in the pride which the Visigothic and Frankish kings showed in holding their commissions from Rome, long after Rome had lost the power to enforce its claims upon them; it is shown in their use of Latin as the language of the court and of the official world. Under the influence of this sentiment Germanic rulers and their peoples imitated the Romans, and, among other things, took over their language. The church probably exerted considerable influence in this direction. Many of the Germans had been converted to Christianity before they entered the Empire, and had heard Latin used in the church services and in the hymns. Among cultivated people of different countries, it was the only medium of communication, and was accepted as the lingua franca of the political and ecclesiastical world, and the traditional medium of expression for literary and legal purposes.

Perhaps, however, one element in the situation should be given more weight than any of the facts just mentioned. Many of the barbarians had been allowed to settle in a more or less peaceful fashion in Roman territory, so that a large part of the western world came into their possession by way of gradual occupation rather than by conquest. They became peasant proprietors, manual laborers, and soldiers in the Roman army. Perhaps, therefore, their occupation of central and southern Europe bears some resemblance to the peaceful invasion of this country by immigrants from Europe, and they may have adopted Latin just as the German or Scandinavian adopts English.

This brings us to the last important point in our inquiry. What is the date before which we shall call the language of the Western Empire Latin, and after which it is better to speak of French, Spanish, and Italian? Such a line of division cannot be sharply drawn, and will in a measure be artificial, because, as we shall attempt to show in the chapter which follows on the "Latin of the Common People," Latin survives in the Romance languages, and has had a continuous life up to the present day. But on practical grounds it is convenient to have such a line of demarcation in mind, and two attempts have been made to fix it. One attempt has been based on linguistic grounds, the other follows political changes more closely. Up to AD 700 certain common sound-changes take place in all parts of the western world. After that date, roughly speaking, this is not the case. Consequently at that time we may say that unity ceased. The other method of approaching the subject leads to essentially the same conclusion, and shows us why unity ceased to exist. In the sixth century the Eastern Emperor Justinian conceived the idea of reuniting the Roman world, and actually recovered and held for a short time Italy, southern Spain, and Africa. This attempt on his part aroused a national spirit among the peoples of these lands, and developed in them a sense of their national independence and individuality. They threw off the foreign yoke and became separate peoples, and developed, each of them, a language of its own. Naturally this sentiment became effective at somewhat different periods in different countries. For France the point may be fixed in the sixth century, for Spain and Italy, in the seventh, and at these dates Latin may be said to take the form of French, Spanish, and Italian." - Abbott, The Common People of Ancient Rome

Valete bene!

Cato
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 82921 From: M•OCTAVIVS•CORVVS Date: 2011-01-28
Subject: CORVI ARE LEAVING
Salvete omnes,

after resignation from all positions in NR Inc I yet took some time to
find the reason to stay in NR Inc as an average citizen, but I can't find any.
Things have changed and NR Inc is no more New Rome that I joined in 2007.
I, M. Octavius Corvus, and all my family: Appia Flavia Gemella, Gnaeus
Octavius, Titus Octavius and Marcus Octavius Minor we renounce our
membership in NR Inc and are leaving for ResPublica Romana to continue
building the New Rome there.
Censores, please, make a note in all our accounts in AC.

Valete,

CORVVS
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 82922 From: Robert Date: 2011-01-28
Subject: Re: CORVI ARE LEAVING
Are you turning the money collected for prodiis to nr?

Sent from my iPhone

On Jan 28, 2011, at 9:08 PM, M•OCTAVIVS•CORVVS <mcorvvs@...> wrote:

> Salvete omnes,
>
> after resignation from all positions in NR Inc I yet took some time to
> find the reason to stay in NR Inc as an average citizen, but I can't find any.
> Things have changed and NR Inc is no more New Rome that I joined in 2007.
> I, M. Octavius Corvus, and all my family: Appia Flavia Gemella, Gnaeus
> Octavius, Titus Octavius and Marcus Octavius Minor we renounce our
> membership in NR Inc and are leaving for ResPublica Romana to continue
> building the New Rome there.
> Censores, please, make a note in all our accounts in AC.
>
> Valete,
>
> CORVVS
>
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 82923 From: Cato Date: 2011-01-29
Subject: a.d. IV Kal. Feb.
Cato omnibus in foro SPD

Hodiernus dies est ante diem IV Kalendas Februarius; hic dies fastus est.

"The sixth division of his religious institutions was devoted to those
the Romans call Salii, whom Numa himself appointed out of the
patricians, choosing twelve young men of the most graceful appearance.
These are the Salii whose holy things are deposited on the Palatine
hill and who are themselves called the Salii Palatini; for the Salii
Agonales, by some called the Salii Collini, the repository of whose
holy things is on the Quirinal hill, were appointed after Numa's time
by King Hostilius, in pursuance of a vow he had made in the war
against the Sabines. All these Salii are a kind of dancers and singers
of hymns in praise of the gods of war. Their festival falls about the
time of the Panathenaea, in the month which they call March, and is
celebrated at the public expense for many days, during which they
proceed through the city with their dances to the Forum and to the
Capitol and to many other places both private and public. They wear
embroidered tunics girt about with wide girdles of bronze, and over
these are fastened, with brooches, robes striped with scarlet and
bordered with purple, which they call trabeae; this garment is
peculiar to the Romans and a mark of the greatest honour. On their
heads they wear apices, as they are called, that is, high caps
contracted into the shape of a cone, which the Greeks call kyrbasiai.
They have each of them a sword hanging at their girdle and in their
right hand they hold a spear or a staff or something else of the sort,
and on their left arm a Thracian buckler,which resembles a
lozenge-shaped shield with its sides drawn in, such as those are said
to carry who among the Greeks perform the sacred rites of the Curetes.
And, in my opinion at least, the Salii, if the word be translated
into Greek, are Curetes, whom, because they are kouroi or "young men,"
we call by that name from their age, whereas the Romans call them
Salii from their lively motions. For to leap and skip is by them
called salire; and for the same reason they call all other dancers
saltatores, deriving their name from the Salii, because their dancing
also is attended by much leaping and capering. Whether I have been
well advised or not in giving them this appellation, anyone who
pleases may gather from their actions. For they execute their
movements in arms, keeping time to a flute, sometimes all together,
sometimes by turns, and while dancing sing certain traditional hymns.
But this dance and exercise performed by armed men and the noise they
make by striking their bucklers with their daggers, if we may base any
conjectures on the ancient accounts, was originated by the Curetes. I
need not mention the legend which is related concerning them, since
almost everybody is acquainted with it. [I hate it when he does that!
- Cato]

Among the vast number of bucklers which both the Salii themselves bear
and some of their servants carry suspended from rods, they say there
is one that fell from heaven and was found in the palace of Numa,
though no one had brought it thither and no buckle road that shape had
ever before been known among the Italians; and that for both these
reasons the Romans concluded that this buckler had been sent by the
gods. They add that Numa, desiring that it should be honoured by
being carried through the city on holy days by the most distinguished
young men and that annual sacrifices should be offered to it, but at
the same time being fearful both of the plot of his enemies and of its
disappearance by theft, caused many other bucklers to be made
resembling the one which fell from heaven, Mamurius, an artificer,
having undertaken the work; so that, as a result of the perfect
resemblance of the man-made imitations, the shape of the buckler sent
by the gods was rendered inconspicuous and difficult to be
distinguished by those who might plot to possess themselves of it.
This dancing after the manner of the Curetes was a native institution
among the Romans and was held in great honour by them, as I gather
from many other indications and especially from what takes place in
their processions both in the Circus and in the theatres. For in all
of them young men clad in handsome tunics, with helmets, swords and
bucklers, march in file. These are the leaders of the procession and
are called by the Romans, from a game of which the Lydians seem to
have been the inventors, ludiones; they show merely a certain
resemblance, in my opinion, to the Salii, since they do not, like the
Salii, do any of the things characteristic of the Curetes, either in
their hymns or dancing. And it was necessary that the Salii should be
free men and native Romans and that both their fathers and mothers
should be living; whereas the others are of any condition whatsoever.
But why should I say more about them?" - Dionysius of Halicarnassus,
"Roman Antiquities" 2.69-70


"His second wife was radiant Themis; she bore the Seasons,
Lawfulness and Justice and blooming Peace, who watch over the works of
mortal men..." - Hesiod, Theogony, 901-903

"At Thebes are three wooden images of Aphrodite, so very ancient that
they are actually said to be votive offerings of Harmonia, and the
story is that they were made out of the wooden figure-heads on the
ships of Kadmos. They call the first Ourania (Heavenly), the second
Pandemos (Common) and the third Apostrophia. Harmonia gave to
Aphrodite the surname of Ourania to signify a love pure and free from
bodily lust; that of Pandemos, to denote sexual intercourse; the
third, that of Apostrophia, that mankind may reject unlawful passion
and sinful acts. For Harmonia knew of many crimes already perpetrated
not only among foreigners but even by Greeks." - Pausanias, Guide to
Greece 9.16.3

Today is the Concordia, held in honor of the goddess Pax. Her oldest
temple, in the Forum Romanum, was was built in 367 BC by Marcus Furius
Camillus. On the Campus Martius (Field of Mars, God of War), she had
a minor sanctuary called the Ara Pacis, dedicated to her on January
30, 9 BC. Another temple was on the Forum Pacis (Templum Placis)
built on the site of a meat market by Vespasian, which was dedicated
in 75. She was depicted in art with olive branches, a cornucopia and a
sceptre. Pax became celebrated (in both senses of the word) as Pax
Romana and Pax Augusta from the 2nd Century BC.


Valete bene!

Cato
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 82924 From: mjk@datanet.ab.ca Date: 2011-01-29
Subject: Re: CORVI ARE LEAVING
Hello,

Sorry to see you all go but good luck and all the best on your next venture. I'm
interested to see how things will turn out. Hopefully this won't be like the
Reformation with hundreds of NR's 20 years down the road as happens with so
many cultural societies I have seen.

Cheers,

QSP








Quoting M•OCTAVIVS•CORVVS <mcorvvs@...>:

> Salvete omnes,
>
> after resignation from all positions in NR Inc I yet took some time to
> find the reason to stay in NR Inc as an average citizen, but I can't find
> any.
> Things have changed and NR Inc is no more New Rome that I joined in 2007.
> I, M. Octavius Corvus, and all my family: Appia Flavia Gemella, Gnaeus
> Octavius, Titus Octavius and Marcus Octavius Minor we renounce our
> membership in NR Inc and are leaving for ResPublica Romana to continue
> building the New Rome there.
> Censores, please, make a note in all our accounts in AC.
>
> Valete,
>
> CORVVS
>
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 82925 From: Cn. Cornelius Lentulus Date: 2011-01-29
Subject: R: [Nova-Roma] CORVI ARE LEAVING
Lentulus pontifex omnibus sal.





This is greatest tragedy, together with losing Cn. Marinus Censorius and
K. Buteo Quintilianus who were our best. Now we lose the best and most
active Nova Roman family, who started to build and are progressing with
building the first Nova Roman Jupiter temple who started the organizing a
real NR colony, and who recruited more than 100 new NR citizens and
focused on families. Without their leaders remaining in NR, the NR
Sarmatians will also join the new org of Quintilianus.



This is the biggest defeat of NR. I'm not sure people realize what we lose now.



I have no words left.



VALETE!






--- Sab 29/1/11, M•OCTAVIVS•CORVVS <mcorvvs@...> ha scritto:

Da: M•OCTAVIVS•CORVVS <mcorvvs@...>
Oggetto: [Nova-Roma] CORVI ARE LEAVING
A: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Data: Sabato 29 gennaio 2011, 05:08







 









Salvete omnes,



after resignation from all positions in NR Inc I yet took some time to

find the reason to stay in NR Inc as an average citizen, but I can't find any.

Things have changed and NR Inc is no more New Rome that I joined in 2007.

I, M. Octavius Corvus, and all my family: Appia Flavia Gemella, Gnaeus

Octavius, Titus Octavius and Marcus Octavius Minor we renounce our

membership in NR Inc and are leaving for ResPublica Romana to continue

building the New Rome there.

Censores, please, make a note in all our accounts in AC.



Valete,



CORVVS

























[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 82926 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2011-01-29
Subject: Re: CORVI ARE LEAVING
Ave!

Lentulus people come and people go.

People said the same thing when Vedius left....and NR is still here. People
said the same thing about the Ides of March...NR is still here.

Perspective man! Perspective!

Vale,

Sulla

On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 1:41 PM, Cn. Cornelius Lentulus <
cn_corn_lent@...> wrote:

>
>
> Lentulus pontifex omnibus sal.
>
> This is greatest tragedy, together with losing Cn. Marinus Censorius and
> K. Buteo Quintilianus who were our best. Now we lose the best and most
> active Nova Roman family, who started to build and are progressing with
> building the first Nova Roman Jupiter temple who started the organizing a
> real NR colony, and who recruited more than 100 new NR citizens and
> focused on families. Without their leaders remaining in NR, the NR
> Sarmatians will also join the new org of Quintilianus.
>
> This is the biggest defeat of NR. I'm not sure people realize what we lose
> now.
>
> I have no words left.
>
> VALETE!
>
> --- Sab 29/1/11, M���OCTAVIVS���CORVVS <mcorvvs@...<mcorvvs%40yahoo.com>>
> ha scritto:
>
> Da: M���OCTAVIVS���CORVVS <mcorvvs@... <mcorvvs%40yahoo.com>>
> Oggetto: [Nova-Roma] CORVI ARE LEAVING
> A: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com <Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com>
> Data: Sabato 29 gennaio 2011, 05:08
>
>
>
>
> Salvete omnes,
>
> after resignation from all positions in NR Inc I yet took some time to
>
> find the reason to stay in NR Inc as an average citizen, but I can't find
> any.
>
> Things have changed and NR Inc is no more New Rome that I joined in 2007.
>
> I, M. Octavius Corvus, and all my family: Appia Flavia Gemella, Gnaeus
>
> Octavius, Titus Octavius and Marcus Octavius Minor we renounce our
>
> membership in NR Inc and are leaving for ResPublica Romana to continue
>
> building the New Rome there.
>
> Censores, please, make a note in all our accounts in AC.
>
> Valete,
>
> CORVVS
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 82927 From: Maxima Valeria Messallina Date: 2011-01-29
Subject: Re: CORVI ARE LEAVING
This is indeed a huge loss to NR. They were the most active and progressive both in the organization of NR and in a real life community. This is a very sad day for NR.
I wish them all the best in their new venture and continued success in all their current pursuits.
 
Maxima Valeria Messallina
 
 

--- On Sat, 1/29/11, Cn. Cornelius Lentulus <cn_corn_lent@...> wrote:


From: Cn. Cornelius Lentulus <cn_corn_lent@...>
Subject: R: [Nova-Roma] CORVI ARE LEAVING
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Cc: mcorvvs@...
Date: Saturday, January 29, 2011, 12:41 PM


 



Lentulus pontifex omnibus sal.

This is greatest tragedy, together with losing Cn. Marinus Censorius and
K. Buteo Quintilianus who were our best. Now we lose the best and most
active Nova Roman family, who started to build and are progressing with
building the first Nova Roman Jupiter temple who started the organizing a
real NR colony, and who recruited more than 100 new NR citizens and
focused on families. Without their leaders remaining in NR, the NR
Sarmatians will also join the new org of Quintilianus.

This is the biggest defeat of NR. I'm not sure people realize what we lose now.

I have no words left.

VALETE!

--- Sab 29/1/11, M•OCTAVIVS•CORVVS <mcorvvs@...> ha scritto:

Da: M•OCTAVIVS•CORVVS <mcorvvs@...>
Oggetto: [Nova-Roma] CORVI ARE LEAVING
A: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Data: Sabato 29 gennaio 2011, 05:08

 

Salvete omnes,

after resignation from all positions in NR Inc I yet took some time to

find the reason to stay in NR Inc as an average citizen, but I can't find any.

Things have changed and NR Inc is no more New Rome that I joined in 2007.

I, M. Octavius Corvus, and all my family: Appia Flavia Gemella, Gnaeus

Octavius, Titus Octavius and Marcus Octavius Minor we renounce our

membership in NR Inc and are leaving for ResPublica Romana to continue

building the New Rome there.

Censores, please, make a note in all our accounts in AC.

Valete,

CORVVS

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]











[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 82928 From: Gnaeus Iulius Caesar Date: 2011-01-29
Subject: Re: CORVI ARE LEAVING
Caesar Sullae sal.

Amice, you are correct. The same sentiments were expressed over Britannia, Hispania and at the time of other walkouts, resignations, tantrums, huffs, puffs, and general pants-on-head moments. People decide to join and people decide to leave, and more people join. It is the cycle of life in Nova Roma. Nova Roma endures.

Equally, there is only one group that has consistently weathered these storms. Nova Roma. Some of those that have left have done so to great fanfare of starting a new group. Others have left quietly. Some have left in fits of temper. Regardless of the manner of their exit, these new groups have all whithered and some never even got off the starting blocks. Eventually a number of these people in some way, at some time, come back to Nova Roma, which has remained intact.

Perspective indeed is required.

Optime vale

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 82929 From: Robert Date: 2011-01-29
Subject: Re: CORVI ARE LEAVING
Ave

Indeed, and I feel like this is the thanks we get after members of the ba raised money for lentulus to go to their wedding! This is the thanks and the appreciation shown! This is really the type of individual Corvus et al are? I see!

Good riddance!

Sent from my iPhone

On Jan 29, 2011, at 2:38 PM, Gnaeus Iulius Caesar <gn_iulius_caesar@...> wrote:

> Caesar Sullae sal.
>
> Amice, you are correct. The same sentiments were expressed over Britannia, Hispania and at the time of other walkouts, resignations, tantrums, huffs, puffs, and general pants-on-head moments. People decide to join and people decide to leave, and more people join. It is the cycle of life in Nova Roma. Nova Roma endures.
>
> Equally, there is only one group that has consistently weathered these storms. Nova Roma. Some of those that have left have done so to great fanfare of starting a new group. Others have left quietly. Some have left in fits of temper. Regardless of the manner of their exit, these new groups have all whithered and some never even got off the starting blocks. Eventually a number of these people in some way, at some time, come back to Nova Roma, which has remained intact.
>
> Perspective indeed is required.
>
> Optime vale
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 82930 From: Publius Ullerius Stephanus Venator Date: 2011-01-29
Subject: Re: CORVI ARE LEAVING
Salve et Salvete Omnes;

I shall agree that this is sad news, just as past leave takings were sad.

We are coming up on 12 years as an organization, it may well be that
we have as many ex-members as we do members.

We also have several administrative items of concern, which will be
solved, some of which we can lay at the doorstep of a few of the
"expatriates."

Such is the history of Nova Roma, which is the saddest part of it all.

Regardless, I think Nova Roma will abide quite well.

As I informed the Senate earlier today, my recent troubles (an
accident in which my car was totaled and doubts about my employment),
which have distracted me, seem to have come to a neutral to positive
conclusion.

I'm not the most dynamic of leaders, but I shall do my best to improve
communications and to try and not promise more than I can deliver (or
honestly attempt delivering).

This too, will help us in the long run; see what happened, try and
understand why it happened, strengthen our resolve to do better.

Optime Vale - Venator, Consul
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 82931 From: Delphicapollo Date: 2011-01-29
Subject: Re: CORVI ARE LEAVING
Salvete

For the record, I found it to be a dignified and well written exit.
It was also a very unfortunate departure.
Does anyone know *why* they have left?
I find this very disturbing.

Valete
S E M Troianus

Sent from my iPhone

On Jan 29, 2011, at 4:30 PM, Maxima Valeria Messallina <maximavaleriamessallina@...
> wrote:

> This is indeed a huge loss to NR. They were the most active and
> progressive both in the organization of NR and in a real life
> community. This is a very sad day for NR.
> I wish them all the best in their new venture and continued success
> in all their current pursuits.
>
> Maxima Valeria Messallina
>
>
>
> --- On Sat, 1/29/11, Cn. Cornelius Lentulus <cn_corn_lent@...>
> wrote:
>
> From: Cn. Cornelius Lentulus <cn_corn_lent@...>
> Subject: R: [Nova-Roma] CORVI ARE LEAVING
> To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> Cc: mcorvvs@...
> Date: Saturday, January 29, 2011, 12:41 PM
>
>
>
> Lentulus pontifex omnibus sal.
>
> This is greatest tragedy, together with losing Cn. Marinus Censorius
> and
> K. Buteo Quintilianus who were our best. Now we lose the best and most
> active Nova Roman family, who started to build and are progressing
> with
> building the first Nova Roman Jupiter temple who started the
> organizing a
> real NR colony, and who recruited more than 100 new NR citizens and
> focused on families. Without their leaders remaining in NR, the NR
> Sarmatians will also join the new org of Quintilianus.
>
> This is the biggest defeat of NR. I'm not sure people realize what
> we lose now.
>
> I have no words left.
>
> VALETE!
>
> --- Sab 29/1/11, M•OCTAVIVS•CORVVS <mcorvvs@...> ha
> scritto:
>
> Da: M•OCTAVIVS•CORVVS <mcorvvs@...>
> Oggetto: [Nova-Roma] CORVI ARE LEAVING
> A: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> Data: Sabato 29 gennaio 2011, 05:08
>
>
>
> Salvete omnes,
>
> after resignation from all positions in NR Inc I yet took some time to
>
> find the reason to stay in NR Inc as an average citizen, but I can't
> find any.
>
> Things have changed and NR Inc is no more New Rome that I joined in
> 2007.
>
> I, M. Octavius Corvus, and all my family: Appia Flavia Gemella, Gnaeus
>
> Octavius, Titus Octavius and Marcus Octavius Minor we renounce our
>
> membership in NR Inc and are leaving for ResPublica Romana to continue
>
> building the New Rome there.
>
> Censores, please, make a note in all our accounts in AC.
>
> Valete,
>
> CORVVS
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 82932 From: QFabiusMaxmi@aol.com Date: 2011-01-29
Subject: Re: R: [Nova-Roma] CORVI ARE LEAVING
In a message dated 1/29/2011 12:41:33 P.M. Pacific Standard Time,
cn_corn_lent@... writes:

This is greatest tragedy, together with losing Cn. Marinus Censorius and
K. Buteo Quintilianus who were our best.
Salvete
Who cares?
If these were the best Nova Roma was in sad shape. Neither was qualified
to carry L Equitius Cinncinatius jock strap, and they saw to his expulsion.

Now we lose the best and most
active Nova Roman family, who started to build and are progressing with
building the first Nova Roman Jupiter temple who started the organizing a
real NR colony, and who recruited more than 100 new NR citizens and
focused on families.
Do you really believe that? If they did all these "things" I'd doubt
they'd leave. No their friends are no longer calling the shots here, so they
gotta go were they are. They were just "fair weather" NR citizens. My over
riding question is this, will they return Nova Roma's money, or are they
simple thieves?

I realize that you are new Cornelius Lentelus so take advice from someone
who has been here from the beginning, people come and people go, but Nova
Roma endures. Morn them if you wish, then get on with your job. That is
what a Roman does.

Valete

Q Fabius Maximus


Without their leaders remaining in NR, the NR
Sarmatians will also join the new org of Quintilianus.

This is the biggest defeat of NR. I'm not sure people realize what we lose
now.

I have no words left.



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 82933 From: petronius_dexter Date: 2011-01-30
Subject: Re: CORVI ARE LEAVING
C. Petronius praetereuntibus s.p.d.,

> For the record, I found it to be a dignified and well written exit.

The departure of a paterfamilias with his family. Corvus oculum corvi non eruet.

> It was also a very unfortunate departure.

For him more than for us, I presume.

> Does anyone know *why* they have left?
> I find this very disturbing.

Yes, we know. Last year, Corvus was among a group which wanted to transform Nova Roma to its own. They did not have success in that, so, they are building their Roman dream between them and in another place.

I was, in the beginning of the last year, a member of this group. But, I prefered the real Nova Roma, with her imperfections, than this Roman dream so perfect and so purged.

Nova Roma is not a club, but an international city. You can enter, you can quit. Quintilianus and Piscinus are building their club, it is not a problem. It is only a conceptual difference on the renovation of Rome.

It is also their problem. In Nova Roma, Piscinus and Quintilianus was on the top of the honores. Both senators, Quintilianus princeps Senatus, Piscinus Pontifex Maximus, and with a succesful cursus honorum. They were the 2 heads of 1 eagle. Quintilianus the civilian leader and Piscinus the religious leader, so they thought that they can kidnap Nova Roma (a 12 years old virgin), but they failed. A true Roman attitude for them would have been them happy to have gotten the top of the positions and sharing with the new citizens their experiences, but they were less wise than conjurers. Honores mutant mores.

Now they are between them, and I hope for them the success of their dream, which is not the Nova Roma's goals.

Optime valete.

C. Petronius Dexter
Arcoiali scribebat
a. d. III Kalendas Februarias P. Vllerio C. Equitio coss.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 82934 From: Delphicapollo Date: 2011-01-30
Subject: Re: CORVI ARE LEAVING
Salve

Thank you very much for the explanation.

Vale bene
S E M Troianus

Sent from my iPhone

On Jan 30, 2011, at 12:11 AM, "petronius_dexter" <jfarnoud94@...>
wrote:

> C. Petronius praetereuntibus s.p.d.,
>
> > For the record, I found it to be a dignified and well written exit.
>
> The departure of a paterfamilias with his family. Corvus oculum
> corvi non eruet.
>
> > It was also a very unfortunate departure.
>
> For him more than for us, I presume.
>
> > Does anyone know *why* they have left?
> > I find this very disturbing.
>
> Yes, we know. Last year, Corvus was among a group which wanted to
> transform Nova Roma to its own. They did not have success in that,
> so, they are building their Roman dream between them and in another
> place.
>
> I was, in the beginning of the last year, a member of this group.
> But, I prefered the real Nova Roma, with her imperfections, than
> this Roman dream so perfect and so purged.
>
> Nova Roma is not a club, but an international city. You can enter,
> you can quit. Quintilianus and Piscinus are building their club, it
> is not a problem. It is only a conceptual difference on the
> renovation of Rome.
>
> It is also their problem. In Nova Roma, Piscinus and Quintilianus
> was on the top of the honores. Both senators, Quintilianus princeps
> Senatus, Piscinus Pontifex Maximus, and with a succesful cursus
> honorum. They were the 2 heads of 1 eagle. Quintilianus the civilian
> leader and Piscinus the religious leader, so they thought that they
> can kidnap Nova Roma (a 12 years old virgin), but they failed. A
> true Roman attitude for them would have been them happy to have
> gotten the top of the positions and sharing with the new citizens
> their experiences, but they were less wise than conjurers. Honores
> mutant mores.
>
> Now they are between them, and I hope for them the success of their
> dream, which is not the Nova Roma's goals.
>
> Optime valete.
>
> C. Petronius Dexter
> Arcoiali scribebat
> a. d. III Kalendas Februarias P. Vllerio C. Equitio coss.
>
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 82935 From: Cn. Cornelius Lentulus Date: 2011-01-30
Subject: Re: The Corvi are leaving
Salvete!

The problem is that they made NR real. What they did was worth 2000000 times what NR with its lists and senate talks do. If you saw their activities, you know that. The Sarmatian local NR groups have city level meeting each week, and from time to time they have meetings with 20-30 real life NRomans. They started to move together and they are planning to live together in vicinity. Their community is a large, vivid real life daily Roman and cultor community. They are REALIZING the goals of NR themselves.
Why Corvus is really leaving is that while they do all these things, they get zero incentives, (almost) zero support, and Nova Roma, as a whole, does not and did never address effectively their work and their efforts - helping them really.

What they did, what they achieved (which is actually more than what NR achieved centrally during all its existence), they did achieve it alone, Nova Roma gave nothing but its name.

Why would they want to continue here? Especially if another group emerges that promises that it will help and support them better?

I have a different approach than Corvus. I say NR is my fatherland and I have to serve it until death. Corvus and the Sarmatians are more pragmatic and say we expect something from NR. We are working on its goals, we move ahead with realizing its goals, and where are the consuls, and the senate? They never ask anything, they never contact us, they don't give anything, etc.

It's more complex than just "friends not in power anymore, then I leave".

Check our history. Whenever we get a really really active group, they leave NR when they see they can get no advantage but disadvantage from being associated. The Britanni (the old active team) left. The Italians left almost altogether and they are now managing a very successful group Pomerium. They are really successful and productive there. All that was intended by them to promote activity in NR. They got no positive cooperation and collaboration from central NR, they started their own thing. Now they thrive, and we are less with dozens of active Italians. That happened with Hispania. They had a full NR associated legion! regular meetings! Life! They left, and Hispania is just a shadow since years. Sarmatia was far far the most successful province amongst all of them. Will they leave as a group. very likely to happen after their leading family left. The once active Brazilians, where are they? My province Pannonia does quite well, too. But I find
increasing difficulty in explaining why we should adhere to NR because dissatisfied voices are more and more frequent. The Germani already disappeared. I could go on.

So, one word:

The problem is very old, and it's very serious. Nova Roma must change in handling the provinces and people's efforts, so that they don't feel left alone and neglected. Nova Roma must give something, not currency or century points, something REAL to those who actually work and achieve things.

We can see from our history that simply allowing to them to "be a citizen and to use the honor to call themselves Nova Roman" is not enough to keep people working and around.

VALETE!
Lentulus





--- Dom 30/1/11, gualterus_graecus <waltms1@...> ha scritto:

Da: gualterus_graecus <waltms1@...>
Oggetto: Re: [BackAlley]The Corvi are leaving
A: BackAlley@yahoogroups.com
Data: Domenica 30 gennaio 2011, 07:45







 











In addition to being corrupt, he flaked out of all of his official duties. Who wants to have a person around who breaks his oaths of office over and over? I say good riddance!



-Gualterus



--- In BackAlley@yahoogroups.com, Delphicapollo <delphicapollo@...> wrote:

>

> Silly reason to leave, and he didn't sound silly, so I doubt that's

> it. After all: Politics change. The winds will blow the other way some

> day. They always do.

>

> Vale

> - Troi

>

> Sent from my iPhone

>

> On Jan 29, 2011, at 11:29 PM, QFabiusMaxmi@... wrote:

>

> >

> > Gee what a surprise! Guess since their friends aren't in power and

> > won't be giving them any more money, no reason to stay.

> >

> > What a bunch of a-holes! Good riddance Like Vado, easy to steal

> > and run away and not stick it out.

> >

> > Fabius

> >

>

























[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 82936 From: Cato Date: 2011-01-30
Subject: a.d. III Kal. Feb.
Cato omnibus in foro SPD

Hodie est ante diem III Kalendas Februarius; hic dies fastus est.


"The seventh division of his sacred institutions was devoted to the
college of the fetiales; these may be called in Greek eirenodikai or
"arbiters of peace." They are chosen men, from the best families, and
exercise their holy office for life; King Numa was also the first who
instituted this holy magistracy among the Romans. But whether he
took his example from those called the Aequicoli, according to the
opinion of some, or from the city of Ardea, as Gellius writes, I
cannot say. It is sufficient for me to state that before Numa's reign
the college of the fetiales did not exist among the Romans . It was
instituted by Numa when he was upon the point of making war on the
people of Fidenae, who had raided and ravaged his territories, in
order to see whether they would come to an accommodation with him
without war; and that is what they actually did, being constrained by
necessity. But since the college of the fetiales is not in use among
the Greeks, I think it incumbent on me to relate how many and how
great affairs fall under its jurisdiction, to the end that those who
are unacquainted with the piety practised by the ares of those times
may not be surprised to find that all their wars had the most
successful outcome; for it will appear that the origins and motives of
them all were most holy, and for this reason especially the gods were
propitious to them in the dangers that attended them. The multitude
of duties, to be sure, that fall within the province of these fetiales
makes it no easy matter to enumerate them all; but to indicate them by
a summary outline, they are as follows: It is their duty to take care
that the Romans do not enter upon an unjust war against any city in
alliance with them, and if others begin the violation of treaties
against them, to go as ambassadors and first make formal demand for
justice, and then, if the others refuse to comply with their demands,
to sanction war. In like manner, if any people in alliance with the
Romans complain of having been injured by them and demand justice,
these men are to determine whether they have suffered anything in
violation of their alliance; and if they find are complaints well
grounded, they are to seize the accused and deliver them up to the
injured parties. They are also to take cognizance of the crimes
committed against ambassadors, to take care that treaties are
religiously observed, to make peace, and if they find that peace has
been made otherwise than is prescribed by the holy laws, to set it
aside; and to inquire into and expiate the transgressions of the
generals in so far as they relate to oaths and treaties, concerning
which I shall speak in the proper places. As to the functions they
performed in the quality of heralds when they went to any city thought
to have injured the Romans (for these things also are worthy of our
knowledge, since they were carried out with great regard to both
religion and justice), I have received the following account: One of
these fetiales, chosen by his colleagues, wearing his sacred robes and
insignia to distinguish him from all others, proceeded towards the
city whose inhabitants had done the injury; and, stopping at the
border, he called upon Jupiter and the rest of the gods to witness
that he was come to demand justice on behalf of the Roman State.
Thereupon he took an oath that he was going to a city that had done an
injury; and having uttered the most dreadful imprecations against
himself and Rome, if what he averred was not true, he then entered
their borders. Afterwards, he called to witness the first person he
met, whether it was one of the countrymen or one of the townspeople,
and having repeated the same imprecations, he advanced towards the
city. And before he entered it he called to witness in the same manner
the gate-keeper or the first person he met at the gates, after which
he proceeded to the forum; and taking his stand there, he discussed
with the magistrates the reasons for his coming, adding everywhere the
same oaths and imprecations. If, then, they were disposed to offer
satisfaction by delivering up the guilty, he departed as a friend
taking leave of friends, carrying the prisoners with him. Or, if they
desired time to deliberate, he allowed them ten days, after which he
returned and waited till they had made this request three times. But
after the expiration of the thirty days, if the city still persisted
in refusing to grant him justice, he called both the celestial and
infernal gods to witness and went away, saying no more than this, that
the Roman State would deliberate at its leisure concerning these
people. Afterwards he, together with the other fetiales, appeared
before the senate and declared that they had done everything that was
ordained by the holy laws, and that, if the senators wished to vote
for war, there would be no obstacle on the part of the gods. But if
any of these things was omitted, neither the senate nor the people had
the power to vote for war. Such, then, is the account we have received
concerning the fetiales." - Dionysius of Halicarnassus 2.72


"The course of my song has led me to the altar of Peace. The day will
be the second from the end of the month. Come, Peace, thy dainty
tresses wreathed Â… and let thy gentle presence abide in the whole
world. So but there be nor foes nor food for triumphs, thou shalt be
unto our chiefs a glory greater than war. May the soldier bear arms
only to check the armed aggressor, and may the fierce trumpet blare
for naught but solemn pomp. Add incense, ye priests, to the flames
that burn on the altar of Peace."
Ovid, Fasti I. 709

On this day in 9 BC, Augustus consecrated the alter of the Pax
Augusta on the Via Flaminia.


"Remember!" - last words of Charles I, King of England, Ireland,
France, Scotland and Wales, beheaded on 30 January A.D. 1649

Valete bene!

Cato
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 82937 From: David Kling Date: 2011-01-30
Subject: Re: [BackAlley] Re: The Corvi are leaving
Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus Cn. Cornelio Lentulo salutem dicit

You are absolutely right. Unfortunately, others would rather shoot insults
and "good riddance" instead of looking at the systemic problem and working
to support a culture that retains people rather than pushes them away. An
organization is always going to have attrition, that is inevitable. But the
loss that we have suffered over the past several years is NOT the work of
one faction or one group only. It is a systemic problem weaved into the
very fabric of Nova Roma and it needs to stop otherwise the only people who
will be left in Nova Roma are the usual crowd in the Back Alley.

It troubles me that so many have left, and it troubles me that so many do
not care.

Vale et valete;

Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus

On Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 5:48 AM, Cn. Cornelius Lentulus <
cn_corn_lent@...> wrote:

>
>
> Salvete!
>
> The problem is that they made NR real. What they did was worth 2000000
> times what NR with its lists and senate talks do. If you saw their
> activities, you know that. The Sarmatian local NR groups have city level
> meeting each week, and from time to time they have meetings with 20-30 real
> life NRomans. They started to move together and they are planning to live
> together in vicinity. Their community is a large, vivid real life daily
> Roman and cultor community. They are REALIZING the goals of NR themselves.
> Why Corvus is really leaving is that while they do all these things, they
> get zero incentives, (almost) zero support, and Nova Roma, as a whole, does
> not and did never address effectively their work and their efforts - helping
> them really.
>
> What they did, what they achieved (which is actually more than what NR
> achieved centrally during all its existence), they did achieve it alone,
> Nova Roma gave nothing but its name.
>
> Why would they want to continue here? Especially if another group emerges
> that promises that it will help and support them better?
>
> I have a different approach than Corvus. I say NR is my fatherland and I
> have to serve it until death. Corvus and the Sarmatians are more pragmatic
> and say we expect something from NR. We are working on its goals, we move
> ahead with realizing its goals, and where are the consuls, and the senate?
> They never ask anything, they never contact us, they don't give anything,
> etc.
>
> It's more complex than just "friends not in power anymore, then I leave".
>
> Check our history. Whenever we get a really really active group, they leave
> NR when they see they can get no advantage but disadvantage from being
> associated. The Britanni (the old active team) left. The Italians left
> almost altogether and they are now managing a very successful group
> Pomerium. They are really successful and productive there. All that was
> intended by them to promote activity in NR. They got no positive cooperation
> and collaboration from central NR, they started their own thing. Now they
> thrive, and we are less with dozens of active Italians. That happened with
> Hispania. They had a full NR associated legion! regular meetings! Life! They
> left, and Hispania is just a shadow since years. Sarmatia was far far the
> most successful province amongst all of them. Will they leave as a group.
> very likely to happen after their leading family left. The once active
> Brazilians, where are they? My province Pannonia does quite well, too. But I
> find increasing difficulty in explaining why we should adhere to NR because
> dissatisfied voices are more and more frequent. The Germani already
> disappeared. I could go on.
>
> So, one word:
>
> The problem is very old, and it's very serious. Nova Roma must change in
> handling the provinces and people's efforts, so that they don't feel left
> alone and neglected. Nova Roma must give something, not currency or century
> points, something REAL to those who actually work and achieve things.
>
> We can see from our history that simply allowing to them to "be a citizen
> and to use the honor to call themselves Nova Roman" is not enough to keep
> people working and around.
>
> VALETE!
> Lentulus
>
>
>
>
>
> --- *Dom 30/1/11, gualterus_graecus <waltms1@...>* ha scritto:
>
>
> Da: gualterus_graecus <waltms1@...>
> Oggetto: Re: [BackAlley]The Corvi are leaving
> A: BackAlley@yahoogroups.com
> Data: Domenica 30 gennaio 2011, 07:45
>
>
>
>
>
> In addition to being corrupt, he flaked out of all of his official duties.
> Who wants to have a person around who breaks his oaths of office over and
> over? I say good riddance!
>
> -Gualterus
>
> --- In BackAlley@yahoogroups.com<http://mc/compose?to=BackAlley%40yahoogroups.com>,
> Delphicapollo <delphicapollo@...> wrote:
> >
> > Silly reason to leave, and he didn't sound silly, so I doubt that's
> > it. After all: Politics change. The winds will blow the other way some
> > day. They always do.
> >
> > Vale
> > - Troi
> >
> > Sent from my iPhone
> >
> > On Jan 29, 2011, at 11:29 PM, QFabiusMaxmi@... wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > Gee what a surprise! Guess since their friends aren't in power and
> > > won't be giving them any more money, no reason to stay.
> > >
> > > What a bunch of a-holes! Good riddance Like Vado, easy to steal
> > > and run away and not stick it out.
> > >
> > > Fabius
> > >
> >
>
>
>
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 82938 From: Cato Date: 2011-01-30
Subject: Re: The Corvi are leaving
Cato omnibus in foro SPD

What is jaw-droppingly sad is that many here actually believe the drivel that Lentulus is spouting.

No, the Corvii did not make Nova Roma "REAL". They - and others who have come and left before them - have used Nova Roma to gather themselves together and put the,selves in a position that is strong enough for them to leave.

The "lists and senate talks" that Lentulus mocks are what gave these groups the foundation upon which to build their own communities. The name of Nova Roma is powerful enough that it acted as a catalyst for them. They certainly did not achieve it "alone"; we nurtured them. Gave them our support, physically, emotionally, financially.

They are active, and getting organized, and doing all sorts of wonderful things in their own fledgling community, and may the gods bless them and all their efforts as they continue. Their success stands as a testament to the strength of our Respublica to stand, wings unfurled, as a starting point, a foundation, a nursing mother, to them.

The so-called "Res Publica Romana" that Quintilianus and Piscinus have gone off to create also owes its life to us; without us they would never exist. The *fact* of their existence is caused simply by the idea that *they* wanted to be in charge, and run things the way they wanted instead of having to obey the laws of *our* Respublica.

So before we go around beating ourselves - and each other - up about how horrible it is that any group of people have left, let's remember that we - the eagle of our Respublica - gave them the strength to fly on their own.

Valete,

Cato
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 82939 From: David Kling Date: 2011-01-30
Subject: Re: The Corvi are leaving
Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus Catoni salutem dicit

I agree with you in that Nova Roma has helped people get in touch with other
people throughout the world that would never have become acquainted
otherwise, but it does not necessarily help to build local community. That
is done through local recruitment. Nova Roma becomes less effective in that
situation especially when we are talking about non-English speakers. Most
of them don't participate in what goes on with "main list" or "back alley"
traffic. They are more focused on local endeavors.

You are absolutely right that any endeavor after Nova Roma by former Nova
Romans owes something to Nova Roma. That cannot be argued, but that creates
the question of "so what?"

I would argue that what is destructive to Nova Roma is the attitude of
"good riddance" and "we don't care." Antagonistic fights on the forums.
Aggressive responses. Fighting and more fighting. These have caused Nova
Roma to be so small it is tragic. Most of us could never survive in our
"non-Roman" lives, in the business world for example, if we handled everyone
like we do these forums. We would find ourselves unemployed and without too
many friends.

This demonization of those who we don't like should cease. Do we really
need an "enemy?"

Your argument about "they wanted to be in charge" is simplex and not
necessarily true from how I saw it. There is much more to the issue than
"power."

Vale;

Modianus

On Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 7:25 AM, Cato <catoinnyc@...> wrote:

>
>
> Cato omnibus in foro SPD
>
> What is jaw-droppingly sad is that many here actually believe the drivel
> that Lentulus is spouting.
>
> No, the Corvii did not make Nova Roma "REAL". They - and others who have
> come and left before them - have used Nova Roma to gather themselves
> together and put the,selves in a position that is strong enough for them to
> leave.
>
> The "lists and senate talks" that Lentulus mocks are what gave these groups
> the foundation upon which to build their own communities. The name of Nova
> Roma is powerful enough that it acted as a catalyst for them. They certainly
> did not achieve it "alone"; we nurtured them. Gave them our support,
> physically, emotionally, financially.
>
> They are active, and getting organized, and doing all sorts of wonderful
> things in their own fledgling community, and may the gods bless them and all
> their efforts as they continue. Their success stands as a testament to the
> strength of our Respublica to stand, wings unfurled, as a starting point, a
> foundation, a nursing mother, to them.
>
> The so-called "Res Publica Romana" that Quintilianus and Piscinus have gone
> off to create also owes its life to us; without us they would never exist.
> The *fact* of their existence is caused simply by the idea that *they*
> wanted to be in charge, and run things the way they wanted instead of having
> to obey the laws of *our* Respublica.
>
> So before we go around beating ourselves - and each other - up about how
> horrible it is that any group of people have left, let's remember that we -
> the eagle of our Respublica - gave them the strength to fly on their own.
>
> Valete,
>
> Cato
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 82940 From: gualterus_graecus Date: 2011-01-30
Subject: [BackAlley] Re: The Corvi are leaving
Whatever "systemic problems" exist, Corvus broke more than one oath. What systemic problem justifies this? A voluntary organization depends on the dedication of its individual members. Individuals who cannot keep their oaths are the bane of such an organization. Do you see a place for oath-breakers in NR?

-GG

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, David Kling <tau.athanasios@...> wrote:
>
> Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus Cn. Cornelio Lentulo salutem dicit
>
> You are absolutely right. Unfortunately, others would rather shoot insults
> and "good riddance" instead of looking at the systemic problem and working
> to support a culture that retains people rather than pushes them away. An
> organization is always going to have attrition, that is inevitable. But the
> loss that we have suffered over the past several years is NOT the work of
> one faction or one group only. It is a systemic problem weaved into the
> very fabric of Nova Roma and it needs to stop otherwise the only people who
> will be left in Nova Roma are the usual crowd in the Back Alley.
>
> It troubles me that so many have left, and it troubles me that so many do
> not care.
>
> Vale et valete;
>
> Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus
>
> On Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 5:48 AM, Cn. Cornelius Lentulus <
> cn_corn_lent@...> wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > Salvete!
> >
> > The problem is that they made NR real. What they did was worth 2000000
> > times what NR with its lists and senate talks do. If you saw their
> > activities, you know that. The Sarmatian local NR groups have city level
> > meeting each week, and from time to time they have meetings with 20-30 real
> > life NRomans. They started to move together and they are planning to live
> > together in vicinity. Their community is a large, vivid real life daily
> > Roman and cultor community. They are REALIZING the goals of NR themselves.
> > Why Corvus is really leaving is that while they do all these things, they
> > get zero incentives, (almost) zero support, and Nova Roma, as a whole, does
> > not and did never address effectively their work and their efforts - helping
> > them really.
> >
> > What they did, what they achieved (which is actually more than what NR
> > achieved centrally during all its existence), they did achieve it alone,
> > Nova Roma gave nothing but its name.
> >
> > Why would they want to continue here? Especially if another group emerges
> > that promises that it will help and support them better?
> >
> > I have a different approach than Corvus. I say NR is my fatherland and I
> > have to serve it until death. Corvus and the Sarmatians are more pragmatic
> > and say we expect something from NR. We are working on its goals, we move
> > ahead with realizing its goals, and where are the consuls, and the senate?
> > They never ask anything, they never contact us, they don't give anything,
> > etc.
> >
> > It's more complex than just "friends not in power anymore, then I leave".
> >
> > Check our history. Whenever we get a really really active group, they leave
> > NR when they see they can get no advantage but disadvantage from being
> > associated. The Britanni (the old active team) left. The Italians left
> > almost altogether and they are now managing a very successful group
> > Pomerium. They are really successful and productive there. All that was
> > intended by them to promote activity in NR. They got no positive cooperation
> > and collaboration from central NR, they started their own thing. Now they
> > thrive, and we are less with dozens of active Italians. That happened with
> > Hispania. They had a full NR associated legion! regular meetings! Life! They
> > left, and Hispania is just a shadow since years. Sarmatia was far far the
> > most successful province amongst all of them. Will they leave as a group.
> > very likely to happen after their leading family left. The once active
> > Brazilians, where are they? My province Pannonia does quite well, too. But I
> > find increasing difficulty in explaining why we should adhere to NR because
> > dissatisfied voices are more and more frequent. The Germani already
> > disappeared. I could go on.
> >
> > So, one word:
> >
> > The problem is very old, and it's very serious. Nova Roma must change in
> > handling the provinces and people's efforts, so that they don't feel left
> > alone and neglected. Nova Roma must give something, not currency or century
> > points, something REAL to those who actually work and achieve things.
> >
> > We can see from our history that simply allowing to them to "be a citizen
> > and to use the honor to call themselves Nova Roman" is not enough to keep
> > people working and around.
> >
> > VALETE!
> > Lentulus
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --- *Dom 30/1/11, gualterus_graecus <waltms1@...>* ha scritto:
> >
> >
> > Da: gualterus_graecus <waltms1@...>
> > Oggetto: Re: [BackAlley]The Corvi are leaving
> > A: BackAlley@yahoogroups.com
> > Data: Domenica 30 gennaio 2011, 07:45
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > In addition to being corrupt, he flaked out of all of his official duties.
> > Who wants to have a person around who breaks his oaths of office over and
> > over? I say good riddance!
> >
> > -Gualterus
> >
> > --- In BackAlley@yahoogroups.com<http://mc/compose?to=BackAlley%40yahoogroups.com>,
> > Delphicapollo <delphicapollo@> wrote:
> > >
> > > Silly reason to leave, and he didn't sound silly, so I doubt that's
> > > it. After all: Politics change. The winds will blow the other way some
> > > day. They always do.
> > >
> > > Vale
> > > - Troi
> > >
> > > Sent from my iPhone
> > >
> > > On Jan 29, 2011, at 11:29 PM, QFabiusMaxmi@ wrote:
> > >
> > > >
> > > > Gee what a surprise! Guess since their friends aren't in power and
> > > > won't be giving them any more money, no reason to stay.
> > > >
> > > > What a bunch of a-holes! Good riddance Like Vado, easy to steal
> > > > and run away and not stick it out.
> > > >
> > > > Fabius
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 82941 From: gualterus_graecus Date: 2011-01-30
Subject: Re: The Corvi are leaving
Salve,

You missed my point entirely. I never claimed that any person should feel permanently bound to NR. My point was that Corvus broke more than one oath that he took in serving NR. Oath-breakers are not a service to NR--they are a poison. While Corvus may have accomplished wonderful things for his local community, he also took certain oaths to serve NR and he refused to live by them. This is not simply a strategic choice to change one organization for another, but a stain on his honor and dignity. Such individuals cannot be trusted and we should not want their unpredictable and unreliable personalities present in the organization, no matter how much good they do for their local community.

Vale,

Gualterus

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Cn. Cornelius Lentulus" <cn_corn_lent@...> wrote:
>
> Salvete!
>
> The problem is that they made NR real. What they did was worth 2000000 times what NR with its lists and senate talks do. If you saw their activities, you know that. The Sarmatian local NR groups have city level meeting each week, and from time to time they have meetings with 20-30 real life NRomans. They started to move together and they are planning to live together in vicinity. Their community is a large, vivid real life daily Roman and cultor community. They are REALIZING the goals of NR themselves.
> Why Corvus is really leaving is that while they do all these things, they get zero incentives, (almost) zero support, and Nova Roma, as a whole, does not and did never address effectively their work and their efforts - helping them really.
>
> What they did, what they achieved (which is actually more than what NR achieved centrally during all its existence), they did achieve it alone, Nova Roma gave nothing but its name.
>
> Why would they want to continue here? Especially if another group emerges that promises that it will help and support them better?
>
> I have a different approach than Corvus. I say NR is my fatherland and I have to serve it until death. Corvus and the Sarmatians are more pragmatic and say we expect something from NR. We are working on its goals, we move ahead with realizing its goals, and where are the consuls, and the senate? They never ask anything, they never contact us, they don't give anything, etc.
>
> It's more complex than just "friends not in power anymore, then I leave".
>
> Check our history. Whenever we get a really really active group, they leave NR when they see they can get no advantage but disadvantage from being associated. The Britanni (the old active team) left. The Italians left almost altogether and they are now managing a very successful group Pomerium. They are really successful and productive there. All that was intended by them to promote activity in NR. They got no positive cooperation and collaboration from central NR, they started their own thing. Now they thrive, and we are less with dozens of active Italians. That happened with Hispania. They had a full NR associated legion! regular meetings! Life! They left, and Hispania is just a shadow since years. Sarmatia was far far the most successful province amongst all of them. Will they leave as a group. very likely to happen after their leading family left. The once active Brazilians, where are they? My province Pannonia does quite well, too. But I find
> increasing difficulty in explaining why we should adhere to NR because dissatisfied voices are more and more frequent. The Germani already disappeared. I could go on.
>
> So, one word:
>
> The problem is very old, and it's very serious. Nova Roma must change in handling the provinces and people's efforts, so that they don't feel left alone and neglected. Nova Roma must give something, not currency or century points, something REAL to those who actually work and achieve things.
>
> We can see from our history that simply allowing to them to "be a citizen and to use the honor to call themselves Nova Roman" is not enough to keep people working and around.
>
> VALETE!
> Lentulus
>
>
>
>
>
> --- Dom 30/1/11, gualterus_graecus <waltms1@...> ha scritto:
>
> Da: gualterus_graecus <waltms1@...>
> Oggetto: Re: [BackAlley]The Corvi are leaving
> A: BackAlley@yahoogroups.com
> Data: Domenica 30 gennaio 2011, 07:45
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>  
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> In addition to being corrupt, he flaked out of all of his official duties. Who wants to have a person around who breaks his oaths of office over and over? I say good riddance!
>
>
>
> -Gualterus
>
>
>
> --- In BackAlley@yahoogroups.com, Delphicapollo <delphicapollo@> wrote:
>
> >
>
> > Silly reason to leave, and he didn't sound silly, so I doubt that's
>
> > it. After all: Politics change. The winds will blow the other way some
>
> > day. They always do.
>
> >
>
> > Vale
>
> > - Troi
>
> >
>
> > Sent from my iPhone
>
> >
>
> > On Jan 29, 2011, at 11:29 PM, QFabiusMaxmi@ wrote:
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> > > Gee what a surprise! Guess since their friends aren't in power and
>
> > > won't be giving them any more money, no reason to stay.
>
> > >
>
> > > What a bunch of a-holes! Good riddance Like Vado, easy to steal
>
> > > and run away and not stick it out.
>
> > >
>
> > > Fabius
>
> > >
>
> >
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 82942 From: Cato Date: 2011-01-30
Subject: Re: The Corvi are leaving
Cato Fabio Buteoni Modiano sal.

We shall have to agree to politely disagree regarding the simplicity of the desire for power that caused Piscinus and Quintilianus to leave. I see it simply as the fact that they tried to usurp power and, failing, have run away.

I do, however, strongly agree with you that demonizing anyone who leaves is unjustified and a waste of time and energy. At the same time, then, we should not encourage anyone to stand in the street wailing and covering themselves with ashes over a departure. It is not the end of anything. It is certainly not the end of the Respublica.

The Corvi have left. May they be blessed in their future endeavors. Now, also may the loyal citizens of Sarmatia be given proper guidance by the Respublica in the days and months ahead.

Vale,

Cato
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 82943 From: David Kling Date: 2011-01-30
Subject: Re: The Corvi are leaving
Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus S.P.D.

This, Ladies and Gentlemen, is exactly the attitude I have been advocating
against. It is sad indeed!

Valete;

Modianus

On Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 8:19 AM, gualterus_graecus <waltms1@...>wrote:

>
>
> Salve,
>
> You missed my point entirely. I never claimed that any person should feel
> permanently bound to NR. My point was that Corvus broke more than one oath
> that he took in serving NR. Oath-breakers are not a service to NR--they are
> a poison. While Corvus may have accomplished wonderful things for his local
> community, he also took certain oaths to serve NR and he refused to live by
> them. This is not simply a strategic choice to change one organization for
> another, but a stain on his honor and dignity. Such individuals cannot be
> trusted and we should not want their unpredictable and unreliable
> personalities present in the organization, no matter how much good they do
> for their local community.
>
> Vale,
>
> Gualterus
>
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 82944 From: David Kling Date: 2011-01-30
Subject: Re: The Corvi are leaving
Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus Catoni salutem dicit

Agreed. No need to cover ourselves with ashes, but it is sad to see people
leave.

Vale;

Modianus

On Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 8:26 AM, Cato <catoinnyc@...> wrote:

>
>
> Cato Fabio Buteoni Modiano sal.
>
> We shall have to agree to politely disagree regarding the simplicity of the
> desire for power that caused Piscinus and Quintilianus to leave. I see it
> simply as the fact that they tried to usurp power and, failing, have run
> away.
>
> I do, however, strongly agree with you that demonizing anyone who leaves is
> unjustified and a waste of time and energy. At the same time, then, we
> should not encourage anyone to stand in the street wailing and covering
> themselves with ashes over a departure. It is not the end of anything. It is
> certainly not the end of the Respublica.
>
> The Corvi have left. May they be blessed in their future endeavors. Now,
> also may the loyal citizens of Sarmatia be given proper guidance by the
> Respublica in the days and months ahead.
>
> Vale,
>
> Cato
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 82945 From: Cato Date: 2011-01-30
Subject: The Way Forward
Cato omnibus in foro SPD

The Senate has just ended a session, and the results of the voting should be being published here relatively soon, after they have been verified by the tribunes. Several important issues have been discussed, and hopefully the outcome of these discussions will open doors towards a better, more energetic approach to the future.

The consuls will be discussing, with the praetors and censors, the best way to move forward with regards to the loyal citizens in Sarmatia. The thoughts of *all* citizens are important, and I encourage all of you to share with each other - and us - your comments.

In addition, we have several positions open in the quaestorship and electoral offices. I would encourage anyone who is interested to write to myself or my colleague (or simply here in the Forum) so that we can prepare for filling vacancies as quickly and efficiently as possible under whatever law may be applicable.

Again, I emphasize that though the Corvi have, in fact, broken oaths to the Respublica and under the eyes of the gods - particularly Iuppiter Feretrius - I strongly encourage us to see it as part of the natural order of growth and expansion. My final hope is that, some day, the Corvi return, as so many citizens do.

For now, let us enjoy each other - even in disagreement - and continue to build a place of which we can all be proud.

Pax,

Cato
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 82946 From: Robert Date: 2011-01-30
Subject: Re: [BackAlley] Re: The Corvi are leaving
If oaths mattered in nr lentulus would be pissed and he as a pontiff would feel betrayed that.

Sent from my iPhone

On Jan 30, 2011, at 6:11 AM, "gualterus_graecus" <waltms1@...> wrote:

>
> Whatever "systemic problems" exist, Corvus broke more than one oath. What systemic problem justifies this? A voluntary organization depends on the dedication of its individual members. Individuals who cannot keep their oaths are the bane of such an organization. Do you see a place for oath-breakers in NR?
>
> -GG
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, David Kling <tau.athanasios@...> wrote:
> >
> > Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus Cn. Cornelio Lentulo salutem dicit
> >
> > You are absolutely right. Unfortunately, others would rather shoot insults
> > and "good riddance" instead of looking at the systemic problem and working
> > to support a culture that retains people rather than pushes them away. An
> > organization is always going to have attrition, that is inevitable. But the
> > loss that we have suffered over the past several years is NOT the work of
> > one faction or one group only. It is a systemic problem weaved into the
> > very fabric of Nova Roma and it needs to stop otherwise the only people who
> > will be left in Nova Roma are the usual crowd in the Back Alley.
> >
> > It troubles me that so many have left, and it troubles me that so many do
> > not care.
> >
> > Vale et valete;
> >
> > Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus
> >
> > On Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 5:48 AM, Cn. Cornelius Lentulus <
> > cn_corn_lent@...> wrote:
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > Salvete!
> > >
> > > The problem is that they made NR real. What they did was worth 2000000
> > > times what NR with its lists and senate talks do. If you saw their
> > > activities, you know that. The Sarmatian local NR groups have city level
> > > meeting each week, and from time to time they have meetings with 20-30 real
> > > life NRomans. They started to move together and they are planning to live
> > > together in vicinity. Their community is a large, vivid real life daily
> > > Roman and cultor community. They are REALIZING the goals of NR themselves.
> > > Why Corvus is really leaving is that while they do all these things, they
> > > get zero incentives, (almost) zero support, and Nova Roma, as a whole, does
> > > not and did never address effectively their work and their efforts - helping
> > > them really.
> > >
> > > What they did, what they achieved (which is actually more than what NR
> > > achieved centrally during all its existence), they did achieve it alone,
> > > Nova Roma gave nothing but its name.
> > >
> > > Why would they want to continue here? Especially if another group emerges
> > > that promises that it will help and support them better?
> > >
> > > I have a different approach than Corvus. I say NR is my fatherland and I
> > > have to serve it until death. Corvus and the Sarmatians are more pragmatic
> > > and say we expect something from NR. We are working on its goals, we move
> > > ahead with realizing its goals, and where are the consuls, and the senate?
> > > They never ask anything, they never contact us, they don't give anything,
> > > etc.
> > >
> > > It's more complex than just "friends not in power anymore, then I leave".
> > >
> > > Check our history. Whenever we get a really really active group, they leave
> > > NR when they see they can get no advantage but disadvantage from being
> > > associated. The Britanni (the old active team) left. The Italians left
> > > almost altogether and they are now managing a very successful group
> > > Pomerium. They are really successful and productive there. All that was
> > > intended by them to promote activity in NR. They got no positive cooperation
> > > and collaboration from central NR, they started their own thing. Now they
> > > thrive, and we are less with dozens of active Italians. That happened with
> > > Hispania. They had a full NR associated legion! regular meetings! Life! They
> > > left, and Hispania is just a shadow since years. Sarmatia was far far the
> > > most successful province amongst all of them. Will they leave as a group.
> > > very likely to happen after their leading family left. The once active
> > > Brazilians, where are they? My province Pannonia does quite well, too. But I
> > > find increasing difficulty in explaining why we should adhere to NR because
> > > dissatisfied voices are more and more frequent. The Germani already
> > > disappeared. I could go on.
> > >
> > > So, one word:
> > >
> > > The problem is very old, and it's very serious. Nova Roma must change in
> > > handling the provinces and people's efforts, so that they don't feel left
> > > alone and neglected. Nova Roma must give something, not currency or century
> > > points, something REAL to those who actually work and achieve things.
> > >
> > > We can see from our history that simply allowing to them to "be a citizen
> > > and to use the honor to call themselves Nova Roman" is not enough to keep
> > > people working and around.
> > >
> > > VALETE!
> > > Lentulus
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --- *Dom 30/1/11, gualterus_graecus <waltms1@...>* ha scritto:
> > >
> > >
> > > Da: gualterus_graecus <waltms1@...>
> > > Oggetto: Re: [BackAlley]The Corvi are leaving
> > > A: BackAlley@yahoogroups.com
> > > Data: Domenica 30 gennaio 2011, 07:45
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > In addition to being corrupt, he flaked out of all of his official duties.
> > > Who wants to have a person around who breaks his oaths of office over and
> > > over? I say good riddance!
> > >
> > > -Gualterus
> > >
> > > --- In BackAlley@yahoogroups.com<http://mc/compose?to=BackAlley%40yahoogroups.com>,
> > > Delphicapollo <delphicapollo@> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Silly reason to leave, and he didn't sound silly, so I doubt that's
> > > > it. After all: Politics change. The winds will blow the other way some
> > > > day. They always do.
> > > >
> > > > Vale
> > > > - Troi
> > > >
> > > > Sent from my iPhone
> > > >
> > > > On Jan 29, 2011, at 11:29 PM, QFabiusMaxmi@ wrote:
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Gee what a surprise! Guess since their friends aren't in power and
> > > > > won't be giving them any more money, no reason to stay.
> > > > >
> > > > > What a bunch of a-holes! Good riddance Like Vado, easy to steal
> > > > > and run away and not stick it out.
> > > > >
> > > > > Fabius
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
>
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 82947 From: publiusalbucius Date: 2011-01-30
Subject: The Corvi have flied away
Lentulo pont. s.d.

Let us try to be moderate and objective.

When our Quintilianus and Marinus left, I did not put the finger on the wound, and gave them my best greetings. But I cannot join you when you say, with more oriental accents than Roman Catonian good sense ;-), that our both censori were "our best".

If they were, they would not have left Nova Roma and would not have committed themselves in the no-way-out straight street of the last year dictatorship's attempt, or would be just have...succeeded in their coup.

They have been an important part of NR History, there is no doubt. Last year, they put their dignitas in the balance of our politics, played, and lost. Imho, the best of us are among us.


Then, I do not know if the Corvan departure is "the biggest defeat of NR", neither if the Corvi is "the best and most active Nova Roman family". All depends on your criteria.

Apparently, the Octavi Corvi took part or organize several "real events". The religious rites held a central place in them. They intended "building the first Nova Roman Jupiter temple" etc.

I will not comment on the last point, for the Senate has just discussed on the complex role played by Sarmatians with, at least, a few members of the sodalitas ProDiis, at the origin of this project. I will just point at the fact that this is not the first time Nova Roma evokes a project to build a temple, and the conditions (legal, financial, etc.) in which *this* project has been led are not that irreprocheable. Let us wait for what our consuls will inform us back.

As other gone citizens, the Corvi may have been deceived by NR, but also have used it on their side.

On the support received by Nova Roma, and naturally letting aside the structural weaknesses on which we are still to work all together, I think that they kept involved in limited groups, and never got involved in the daily and public working of our Republic.

Personally, I did not receive, either as citizen or as gov. Galliae, just *one* personal e-mail from the Corvi asking me about my interests, how I saw real events, working with other neighbor provinces etc., what we had discussed with all our other European friends or ex-friends.

The impression - which naturally has its part of subjectivity - is that the Corvi came, saw, chose what they found as the most interesting for us in NR (religious rites and networks), and went out.

Beside the statement on the need to re-think our organization and our action, specially towards the territories, and that I share with you and others, I think that the leaving of the Corvi, the foundation of Pomerium, etc. may also lived as successes of NR : people came in NR, learn a few things, got "romanly adults" and decided to leave NR home, looking for "smthg else".
At least, would they have if NR would not have allowed them to "think their romanity", and to confirm their will living this or that ?

Let us go on working, but let us not under-evaluating what we bring our citizens : a place where they may think the current world, learn and practice our values and all aspects of Roman civ., "weigh" their relation to Rome, and what they want to do for It. :-)

Vale et omnes,


Albucius csr
procos.






--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Robert <robert.woolwine@...> wrote:
>
> If oaths mattered in nr lentulus would be pissed and he as a pontiff would feel betrayed that.
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On Jan 30, 2011, at 6:11 AM, "gualterus_graecus" <waltms1@...> wrote:
>
> >
> > Whatever "systemic problems" exist, Corvus broke more than one oath. What systemic problem justifies this? A voluntary organization depends on the dedication of its individual members. Individuals who cannot keep their oaths are the bane of such an organization. Do you see a place for oath-breakers in NR?
> >
> > -GG
> >
> > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, David Kling <tau.athanasios@> wrote:
> > >
> > > Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus Cn. Cornelio Lentulo salutem dicit
> > >
> > > You are absolutely right. Unfortunately, others would rather shoot insults
> > > and "good riddance" instead of looking at the systemic problem and working
> > > to support a culture that retains people rather than pushes them away. An
> > > organization is always going to have attrition, that is inevitable. But the
> > > loss that we have suffered over the past several years is NOT the work of
> > > one faction or one group only. It is a systemic problem weaved into the
> > > very fabric of Nova Roma and it needs to stop otherwise the only people who
> > > will be left in Nova Roma are the usual crowd in the Back Alley.
> > >
> > > It troubles me that so many have left, and it troubles me that so many do
> > > not care.
> > >
> > > Vale et valete;
> > >
> > > Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus
> > >
> > > On Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 5:48 AM, Cn. Cornelius Lentulus <
> > > cn_corn_lent@> wrote:
> > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Salvete!
> > > >
> > > > The problem is that they made NR real. What they did was worth 2000000
> > > > times what NR with its lists and senate talks do. If you saw their
> > > > activities, you know that. The Sarmatian local NR groups have city level
> > > > meeting each week, and from time to time they have meetings with 20-30 real
> > > > life NRomans. They started to move together and they are planning to live
> > > > together in vicinity. Their community is a large, vivid real life daily
> > > > Roman and cultor community. They are REALIZING the goals of NR themselves.
> > > > Why Corvus is really leaving is that while they do all these things, they
> > > > get zero incentives, (almost) zero support, and Nova Roma, as a whole, does
> > > > not and did never address effectively their work and their efforts - helping
> > > > them really.
> > > >
> > > > What they did, what they achieved (which is actually more than what NR
> > > > achieved centrally during all its existence), they did achieve it alone,
> > > > Nova Roma gave nothing but its name.
> > > >
> > > > Why would they want to continue here? Especially if another group emerges
> > > > that promises that it will help and support them better?
> > > >
> > > > I have a different approach than Corvus. I say NR is my fatherland and I
> > > > have to serve it until death. Corvus and the Sarmatians are more pragmatic
> > > > and say we expect something from NR. We are working on its goals, we move
> > > > ahead with realizing its goals, and where are the consuls, and the senate?
> > > > They never ask anything, they never contact us, they don't give anything,
> > > > etc.
> > > >
> > > > It's more complex than just "friends not in power anymore, then I leave".
> > > >
> > > > Check our history. Whenever we get a really really active group, they leave
> > > > NR when they see they can get no advantage but disadvantage from being
> > > > associated. The Britanni (the old active team) left. The Italians left
> > > > almost altogether and they are now managing a very successful group
> > > > Pomerium. They are really successful and productive there. All that was
> > > > intended by them to promote activity in NR. They got no positive cooperation
> > > > and collaboration from central NR, they started their own thing. Now they
> > > > thrive, and we are less with dozens of active Italians. That happened with
> > > > Hispania. They had a full NR associated legion! regular meetings! Life! They
> > > > left, and Hispania is just a shadow since years. Sarmatia was far far the
> > > > most successful province amongst all of them. Will they leave as a group.
> > > > very likely to happen after their leading family left. The once active
> > > > Brazilians, where are they? My province Pannonia does quite well, too. But I
> > > > find increasing difficulty in explaining why we should adhere to NR because
> > > > dissatisfied voices are more and more frequent. The Germani already
> > > > disappeared. I could go on.
> > > >
> > > > So, one word:
> > > >
> > > > The problem is very old, and it's very serious. Nova Roma must change in
> > > > handling the provinces and people's efforts, so that they don't feel left
> > > > alone and neglected. Nova Roma must give something, not currency or century
> > > > points, something REAL to those who actually work and achieve things.
> > > >
> > > > We can see from our history that simply allowing to them to "be a citizen
> > > > and to use the honor to call themselves Nova Roman" is not enough to keep
> > > > people working and around.
> > > >
> > > > VALETE!
> > > > Lentulus
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --- *Dom 30/1/11, gualterus_graecus <waltms1@>* ha scritto:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Da: gualterus_graecus <waltms1@>
> > > > Oggetto: Re: [BackAlley]The Corvi are leaving
> > > > A: BackAlley@yahoogroups.com
> > > > Data: Domenica 30 gennaio 2011, 07:45
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > In addition to being corrupt, he flaked out of all of his official duties.
> > > > Who wants to have a person around who breaks his oaths of office over and
> > > > over? I say good riddance!
> > > >
> > > > -Gualterus
> > > >
> > > > --- In BackAlley@yahoogroups.com<http://mc/compose?to=BackAlley%40yahoogroups.com>,
> > > > Delphicapollo <delphicapollo@> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Silly reason to leave, and he didn't sound silly, so I doubt that's
> > > > > it. After all: Politics change. The winds will blow the other way some
> > > > > day. They always do.
> > > > >
> > > > > Vale
> > > > > - Troi
> > > > >
> > > > > Sent from my iPhone
> > > > >
> > > > > On Jan 29, 2011, at 11:29 PM, QFabiusMaxmi@ wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Gee what a surprise! Guess since their friends aren't in power and
> > > > > > won't be giving them any more money, no reason to stay.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > What a bunch of a-holes! Good riddance Like Vado, easy to steal
> > > > > > and run away and not stick it out.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Fabius
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> > >
> >
> >
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 82948 From: Timothy or Stephen Gallagher Date: 2011-01-30
Subject: FW: [Explorator] explorator 13.41
Salvete

FYI

Please see Rome Reborn among the others.

Valete



To: explorator@yahoogroups.com; BRITARCH@...
From: rogueclassicist@...
Date: Sun, 30 Jan 2011 09:22:48 -0500
Subject: [Explorator] explorator 13.41






================================================================
explorator 13.41 January 30, 2011
================================================================
Editor's note: Most urls should be active for at least eight
hours from the time of publication.

For your computer's protection, Explorator is sent in plain text
and NEVER has attachments. Be suspicious of any Explorator which
arrives otherwise!!!

================================================================
================================================================
Thanks to Arthur Shippee, Dave Sowdon, David Critchley, 'Stan',
Diana Wright,Dorothy Lobel King,Donna Hurst, Edward Rockstein,
Rick Heli,Kurt Theis,John McMahon, Barnea Selavan,
Joseph Lauer, Mike Ruggeri, Richard Campbell, L&J Bailey,
Richard C. Griffiths,Bob Heuman, Rochelle Altman,
and Ross W. Sargent for headses upses this week (as always
hoping I have left no one out).
================================================================
EARLY HUMANS
================================================================
A 'toolkit' from the UAE suggests modern humans may have left Africa more
than
100 000 years b.p.:

http://news.discovery.com/archaeology/human-migration-africa-110127.html
http://www.artdaily.org/index.asp?int_sec=2&int_new=44522
http://www.physorg.com/news/2011-01-modern-humans-arabia-earlier-thought.html
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-12300228
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20110127/ap_on_sc/us_sci_out_of_africa
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/01/28/science/28africa.html
http://www.npr.org/2011/01/28/133271273/tools-suggest-humans-left-africa-earlier-via-arabia
http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/01/27/idINIndia-54462720110127
http://www.pbs.org/newshour/rundown/2011/01/tools-hold-clues-to-early-human-migration-out-of-africa.html
http://dailynews.muzi.com/news/ll/english/10106806.shtml
http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2011-01/aaft-mhr012111.php

More on the earlier departure of humans from trees:

http://news.discovery.com/archaeology/human-ancestors-trees-bipedal-110128.html
================================================================
AFRICA
================================================================
Excavating a Kingdom of Meroe site in Sudan:

http://www.radio.cz/en/section/curraffrs/czech-team-excavates-ancient-sites-dedicated-to-nubian-gods

Finds from various periods along Tanzania's coast:

http://www.eturbonews.com/20700/archeologists-discover-ancient-ruins-along-tanzanian-coastal-are
================================================================
ANCIENT NEAR EAST AND EGYPT
================================================================
Theory about some 'secret rooms' in the Great Pyramid:

http://www.livescience.com/history/great-pyramid-of-giza-houses-secret-rooms-110128.html
http://www.physorg.com/news/2011-01-great-pyramid-secret-chambers-french.html
http://news.discovery.com/archaeology/great-pyramid-giza-hidden-chambers-110127.html
http://www.google.com/hostednews/afp/article/ALeqM5iMCQvP84YQG7b1iyE8bP_uI0PlXw?docId=CNG.b27ce982d5a2c46fdde0c964ca0fcea9.ca1

Remains of a fox in a 16 500 years bp burial from Uyun-al-Hammam:

http://www.physorg.com/news/2011-01-fox-prehistoric-friend.html

Some sort of subterranean chamber from Hama:

http://www.english.globalarabnetwork.com/201101258765/Related-news-from-Syria/syria-archaeologists-uncovered-subterranean-chamber-in-hama.html

An inscribed Nabatean column from Daraa:

http://www.english.globalarabnetwork.com/201101248740/Related-news-from-Syria/syria-archaeologists-discovered-column-dating-back-to-2000-bc.html

Remains of a Second Temple 'pilgrim road':

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-01-25/archaeologists-discover-ancient-pilgrim-road-through-jerusalem-s-old-city.html

... and they've finished clearing a Second Temple water channel/tunnel
(different
spins in the coverage of this one):

http://www.artdaily.org/index.asp?int_sec=2&int_new=44437
http://www.antiquities.org.il/about_eng.asp?Modul_id=14
http://www.jpost.com/NationalNews/Article.aspx?id=205251
http://www.jta.org/news/article/2011/01/25/2742691/excavation-on-ancient-jerusalem-tunnel-completed
http://arabnews.com/middleeast/article242615.ece
http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-4019130,00.html
http://www.haaretz.com/print-edition/news/digging-completed-on-tunnel-under-old-city-walls-in-east-jerusalem-1.338990
http://www.haaretz.com/print-edition/news/newly-uncovered-tunnel-passes-under-old-city-walls-1.338990
http://www.deseretnews.com/article/700103989/Ancient-water-tunnel-excavated-in-Jerusalem.html?s_cid=rss-48
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/01/26/ancient-water-tunnel-exca_n_813966.html
http://abcnews.go.com/International/wireStory?id=12756921

... and I think this is fallout therefrom:

http://www.haaretz.com/print-edition/news/new-jerusalem-tunnel-will-damage-temple-mount-palestinians-say-1.339213
http://www.therecord.com/news/world/article/477944--excavated-ancient-tunnel-in-jerusalem-s-old-city-splits-neighbours
http://www.haaretz.com/print-edition/news/palestinians-say-new-jerusalem-tunnel-will-damage-temple-mount-1.339213

A preliminary report from En Gedi:

http://www.hadashot-esi.org.il/report_detail_eng.asp?id=1594

Nice feature on Max von Oppenheim:

http://www.spiegel.de/international/zeitgeist/0,1518,741928,00.html

... and one on Gobeki Tepe:

http://www.todayszaman.com/news-233727-gobekli-tepe-making-us-rethink-our-ancestors.html

Nice page of online publications (plenty very recent) relating to Qesem
Cave:

http://www.tau.ac.il/humanities/archaeology/projects/qesem/publications.html

A number of artifacts (most from the Tamarli Tumulus) were returned to
Turkey:

http://www.todayszaman.com/news-233355-culture-ministry-brings-44-historical-artifacts-back-to-turkey-in-2010.html

Concerns for historic buildings in Beirut:

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/01/27/arts/27iht-m27cbeirut.html

Egyptology News Blog:

http://egyptology.blogspot.com/

Egyptology Blog:

http://www.egyptologyblog.co.uk/

Dr Leen Ritmeyer's Blog:

http://blog.ritmeyer.com/

Paleojudaica:

http://paleojudaica.blogspot.com/

Persepolis Fortification Archives:

http://persepolistablets.blogspot.com/

Archaeologist at Large:

http://spaces.msn.com/members/ArchaeologyinEgypt/
================================================================
ANCIENT GREECE AND ROME (AND CLASSICS)
================================================================
They reopened the House of the Vestals this week:

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2011/jan/27/new-route-opened-in-roman-forum/
http://abcnews.go.com/Entertainment/wireStory?id=12778178
http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/travel/2014054942_webromanforum27.html?syndication=rss

Remains of an 'African' soldier from Warwickshire:

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-coventry-warwickshire-12280213

but cf:

http://killgrove.blogspot.com/2011/01/african-in-avon.html

A Roman road in Puddletown Forest:

http://www.dorsetecho.co.uk/news/8820585.Roman_road_found_in_Puddletown_Forest/

Researching the Roman presence in Portugal:

http://www.unreportedheritagenews.com/2011/01/land-of-watchtowers-new-research-sheds.html

37 burials from Archontiko:

http://www.ekathimerini.com/4dcgi/_w_articles_wsite4_1_10/01/2011_372433

Cartledge and Romm continue their chat about Alexander:

http://blogs.forbes.com/booked/2011/01/28/two-great-historians-talk-alexander-the-great-part-6/

A project to make the Olympias seaworthy again:

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703909904576051842480713086.html
http://online.wsj.com/article/AP13f7757d218c491d89abe8a7988e3d4e.html
http://www.wcax.com/Global/story.asp?S=13931854

Aristotle's Poetics was/were featured on In Our Time:

http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b00xw210

A nice update to the Rome Reborn project:

http://vimeo.com/15808133

I think we've mentioned this 3d Venus de Milo thing before:

http://www.konicaminolta.com/tech_info/museum/index.html

Nice feature on Heron:

http://io9.com/5742457/the-ancient-greek-hero-who-invented-the-steam-engine-cybernetics-and-vending-machines

On Thucydidean abuse (not sure I mentioned this one):

http://drezner.foreignpolicy.com/posts/2011/01/24/this_week_on_thucydides_watch

I think I left out this lamp-turns-out-to-be-a-Roman-urn story last week:

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-12258359

If Valentine's Day is coming up, we know Barbara Gold will be in the news:

http://www.newswise.com/articles/view/572873/?sc=rsln

More on shoe companies and the Colosseum:

http://www.presstv.ir/detail/161598.html
http://fashion.telegraph.co.uk/columns/hilary-alexander/TMG8278100/Tods-to-restore-Romes-Colosseum.html

Latest reviews from Scholia:

http://www.classics.ukzn.ac.za/reviews/

Latest reviews from BMCR:

http://bmcr.brynmawr.edu/recent.html

Visit our blog:

http://rogueclassicism.com/
================================================================
EUROPE AND THE UK (+ Ireland)
================================================================
Find of what is being dubbed 'Britain's oldest guard dog':

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-1350822/Iron-age-dog-2k-years-old-unearthed-guarding-ancient-treasure.html?ITO=1490
http://www.newkerala.com/news/world/fullnews-133734.html

A project to analyze some Tudor tombs (we may have had this before):

http://www.physorg.com/news/2011-01-truth-tudor-tombs.html
http://www.guardian.co.uk/education/2011/jan/25/research-space-technology-history

Plans for the Old Duchy Palace in Lostwithiel:

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-cornwall-12311936

Archaeology in Europe Blog:

http://archaeology-in-europe.blogspot.com/

================================================================
ASIA AND THE SOUTH PACIFIC
================================================================
Most Western Xia dynasty remains ever found:

http://english.peopledaily.com.cn/90001/90782/90873/7270858.html

A prehistoric 'town hall' from Shaanxi:

http://news.xinhuanet.com/english2010/culture/2011-01/25/c_13706215.htm

Another Great Wall found ... this time in Viet Nam:

http://edition.cnn.com/2011/WORLD/asiapcf/01/25/vietnam.wall/?hpt=C1

Brief item on an ancient temple being found in the jungles of Sri Lanka:

http://www.dailynews.lk/2011/01/24/news12.asp

East Asian Archaeology:

http://eastasiablog.wordpress.com/2010/05/20/east-asian-archaeology-cultural-heritage-%E2%80%93-2052010/

Southeast Asian Archaeology Newsblog:

http://www.southeastasianarchaeology.com/

New Zealand Archaeology eNews:

http://www.nzarchaeology.org/netsubnews.htm
================================================================
NORTH AMERICA
================================================================
Did an historian mess with a purported pardon penned by Abe Lincoln?:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2011/01/24/AR2011012406441.html
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2011/01/24/AR2011012404713.html

... and a followup:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2011/01/25/AR2011012501832.html

An 18th century wharf comes to light in Boston:

http://www.boston.com/news/local/massachusetts/articles/2011/01/27/newburyport_construction_reveals_wharf_from_1700s/

Interesting blog post on prehistoric lithic quarries in Pennsylvania:

http://twipa.blogspot.com/2011/01/prehistoric-lithic-quarries-in.html

A 19th century guide to brothels in New York:

http://cityroom.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/01/26/on-the-records-a-well-preserved-roadmap-to-perdition/
http://documents.nytimes.com/a-vest-pocket-guide-to-brothels-in-19th-century-new-york-for-gentlemen-on-the-go

Always fun to open a 100 year b.p. time capsule:

http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2011/01/27/BAP01HEK9S.DTL

A novel account of John Wilkes Booth's 'second life':

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/01/27/books/27conrad.html
================================================================
CENTRAL AND SOUTH AMERICA
================================================================
A followup of sorts to that story of UCSB's plans to work at El Pilar:

http://www.independent.com/news/2011/jan/26/ucsb-studies-ancient-maya-city/

Press release about some sort of Chichen Itza computer thingie:

http://www.artdaily.org/index.asp?int_sec=2&int_new=44449
http://www.redorbit.com/news/technology/1984130/new_online_archive_brings_the_ancient_maya_city_of_chichen/index.html
http://news.yahoo.com/s/usnw/20110124/pl_usnw/DC34998_1

Archaeologists have restored the sarcophagus of Pakal:

http://www.artdaily.org/index.asp?int_sec=2&int_new=44442

Mike Ruggeri's Ancient Americas Breaking News:

http://web.mac.com/michaelruggeri

Ancient MesoAmerica News:

http://ancient-mesoamerica-news-updates.blogspot.com/
================================================================
OTHER ITEMS OF INTEREST
================================================================
A forensic document analyst pokes around Swift's letters:

http://www.physorg.com/news/2011-01-secrets-swift-intimate-letters-revealed.html

Chopin possibly suffered from epilepsy:

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-12265573
http://uk.news.yahoo.com/18/20110125/tsc-chopin-s-hallucinations-caused-by-ep-c2ff8aa.html
http://www.physorg.com/news/2011-01-chopin-hallucinations-epilepsy.html

A letter by Robbie Burns with an early version of one of his works:

http://www.artdaily.org/index.asp?int_sec=2&int_new=44432
http://www.guardian.co.uk/books/2011/jan/24/robert-burns-letter-wounded-hare

Someone has made an archaeology game:

http://www.gazette.net/stories/01262011/nortnew205146_32541.php

... and the JPost seems curiously positive about the Naked Archaeologist:

http://www.jpost.com/ArtsAndCulture/Entertainment/Article.aspx?id=205506

Audio feature on George Bass and a Byzantine shipwreck:

http://www.thisamericanlife.org/sites/all/play_music/play_full.php?play=399

The Egyptian jackal is actually a wolf, apparently:

http://news.mongabay.com/2011/0126-hance_africanwolf.html

On discovering new species and imperialism:

http://opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/01/23/heroic-naturalists-or-imperialist-dogs/

It wasn't easy being king:

http://www.physorg.com/news/2011-01-kings.html
http://www.guardian.co.uk/education/2011/jan/28/king-survey-dangerous-job-history

A mathematical model for the emergence and collapse of complex societies
(!):

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2011/01/110119151816.htm

On Genghis Khan and climate change:

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-1350272/Genghis-Khan-killed-people-forests-grew-carbon-levels-dropped.html
http://news.discovery.com/earth/mongols-vikings-and-romans-connected-to-climate.html

Mark Twain's autobiography has apparently created a market for imitators:

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/01/24/books/24twain.html

Feature on the online OED:

http://papercuts.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/01/14/the-revamped-o-e-d-online/

Not a lot of genetic variation in grapes, apparently:

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/01/25/science/25wine.html

Interview with James Miller about his *Examined Lives*:

http://www.wnyc.org/shows/lopate/2011/jan/26/examined-lives-socrates-nietzsche/

... and here's the reviews:

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/01/23/books/review/Bakewell-t.html
http://www.salon.com/books/philosophy/?story=/books/feature/2011/01/24/examined_lives_james_miller

Review of Dreyfus and Kelly, *All Things Shining*:

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/01/23/books/review/Neiman-t.html
http://www.salon.com/books/feature/2011/01/24/examined_lives_james_miller

Review of Nicholas Delbanco, *Lastingness: The Art of Old Age*:

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/01/23/books/review/Allen-t.html

Overview of some historical mystery novels:

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/01/30/books/review/Crime-t.html
================================================================
TOURISTY THINGS
================================================================
Hadrian's Wall:

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/travel/destinations/europe/uk/8280915/Hadrians-Wall-a-comeback-by-the-Romans-in-the-North.html
================================================================
BLOGS
================================================================
Hopkins in Egypt Today:

http://www.jhu.edu/egypttoday

About.com Archaeology:

http://archaeology.about.com/

Archaeology Briefs:

http://archaeologybriefs.blogspot.com/

Taygete Atlantis excavations blogs aggregator:

http://planet.atlantides.org/taygete/

Time Machine:

http://heatherpringle.wordpress.com/
================================================================
CRIME BEAT
================================================================

Looting Matters:

http://lootingmatters.blogspot.com/

Illicit Cultural Property:

http://illicit-cultural-property.blogspot.com/
================================================================
NUMISMATICA
================================================================
Some recent auction results:

http://www.artdaily.org/index.asp?int_sec=2&int_new=44459

More on efforts to keep the Frome Hoard in Somerset:

http://www.somersetcountygazette.co.uk/news/8817577.Battle_to_keep_Frome_Hoard_in_Somerset/

Latest eSylum newsletter:

http://www.coinbooks.org/club_nbs_esylum_v14n04.html

Ancient Coin Collecting:

http://ancientcoincollecting.blogspot.com/

Ancient Coins:

http://classicalcoins.blogspot.com/

Coin Link:

http://www.coinlink.com/News/
================================================================
EXHIBITIONS, AUCTIONS, AND MUSEUM-RELATED
================================================================
Dura Europos:

http://www.bc.edu/offices/pubaf/news/2011/duraeuropos01272011.html

Poetry of Drawing:

http://www.ft.com/cms/s/2/04a4fd62-2a63-11e0-804a-00144feab49a.html

Dawn of History (Abu Dhabi):

http://www.middle-east-online.com/english/?id=43914

The Pergamon Museum has restored a pile of items from the Tell Halaf display
which were
shattered during WWII:

http://www.artdaily.org/index.asp?int_sec=2&int_new=44517
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-12308854
http://au.news.yahoo.com/thewest/entertainment/a/-/entertainment/8735022/berlin-shows-off-reallife-indiana-jones-treasures/
http://in.reuters.com/article/2011/01/28/idINIndia-54490720110128
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2011/jan/27/statues-devastated-in-wwii-go-on-show-in-berlin/
http://www.google.com/hostednews/canadianpress/article/ALeqM5gmFfNJmVq-ji09Za3LyDm6CICt4Q?docId=5774679
http://www.mercurynews.com/entertainment/ci_17216218
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/huff-wires/20110127/eu-germany-rescued-statues
http://www.salon.com/wires/entertainment/2011/01/27/D9L0OI182_eu_germany_rescued_statues/

While other things were brewing in Egypt, antiquities types were apparently
demanding
the return of Nefertiti's bust again:

http://news.discovery.com/archaeology/egypt-wants-nefertiti-bust-back.html
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/feedarticle/9465457
http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5g5ccysrLchCCcGtA_LcbtTPTwVJA?docId=2651e0bdf82f445a81918063ade68915
http://www.google.com/hostednews/afp/article/ALeqM5jr3XYY-d1PKbeznAjNvxMECRSBdA?docId=CNG.07485e9b9bae58aea565c435050ae5bf.ba1
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-01-24/egypt-demands-return-of-3-400-year-old-queen-nefertiti-bust-from-germany.html
http://news.scotsman.com/world/Egypt-requests-the-return-of.6701075.jp

... it was refused, of course:

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/germany-refuses-to-return-bust-to-egypt-2194486.html
http://www.artdaily.org/index.asp?int_sec=2&int_new=44425
http://news.discovery.com/archaeology/egypt-wants-nefertiti-bust-back.html
http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/01/28/us-germany-nefertiti-mayor-idUSTRE70R72520110128?feedType=RSS&feedName=lifestyleMolt
http://af.reuters.com/article/egyptNews/idAFLDE70R1Y420110128
http://www.presstv.ir/detail/162119.html

... and in case you were wondering about the Egyptian Museum during this
week's protests:

http://www.smh.com.au/world/soldiers-rescue-ancient-treasures-as-protesters-threaten-to-loot-museum-20110129-1a95w.html
http://cosmiclog.msnbc.msn.com/_news/2011/01/28/5943271-egyptians-rush-to-save-tuts-riches
http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5gGiADb4YzqsC_nlgj5gkFPvXl7RA?docId=3944f4eda7c64f4c9449a7c017d6e281
http://www.salon.com/news/egyptian_protests/?story=/news/feature/2011/01/28/egyptian_protests
http://www.artdaily.org/index.asp?int_sec=2&int_new=44562
http://www.kgw.com/home/Looters-rip-heads-off-mummies-at-Egyptian-Museum-114863799.html

... but there was (apparently) some looting:

http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/01/29/us-egypt-museum-idUSTRE70S1YU20110129
http://www.nytimes.com/reuters/2011/01/29/world/international-us-egypt-museum.html
http://www.newsdaily.com/stories/tre70r7k8-us-egypt-museum/
http://www.torontosun.com/news/world/2011/01/29/17081751.html
http://www.news24.com/Africa/News/Looters-destroy-Egyptian-mummies-20110129Anti-government
http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20110129/sc_nm/us_egypt_museum
http://edition.cnn.com/2011/WORLD/africa/01/30/egypt.unrest.museum/
http://thelede.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/01/29/latest-updates-on-protests-in-egypt-2/?hp
http://www.nytimes.com/reuters/2011/01/29/world/international-us-egypt-museum.html
video:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jp9dWzNG8tk&feature=youtu.be

... some photos via Al Jazeera:

http://www.flickr.com/photos/el-amiro21/5398533418/in/photostream/

This a.m. there is concern for a couple of Tut-related items, but it's
confusing:

http://cosmiclog.msnbc.msn.com/_news/2011/01/28/5943271-were-tuts-treasures-damaged

The Met has purchased something by one of Raphael's students:

http://artsbeat.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/01/26/metropolitan-museum-purchases-work-by-student-of-raphael/

Man paints dog:

http://artsbeat.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/01/26/man-in-this-case-picasso-paints-dog

Scotland wants a William Wallace letter returned:

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-12262174

Nice price for a Titian:

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/entertainment-arts-12305296
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/01/28/arts/design/28vogel.html

Feature on Charles Ryskamp and the auction of his estate:

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/01/29/arts/29iht-melik29.html

Looking at Christie's and Sotheby's recent Old Masters sales:

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/01/28/arts/28iht-melik28.html
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/01/27/arts/design/27sell.html

... in a similar vein:

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/01/22/arts/22iht-melik22.html

================================================================
PERFORMANCES AND THEATRE-RELATED
================================================================
Hamlet (silent!):

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/01/22/theater/22synetic.html

The Misanthrope:

http://theater.nytimes.com/2011/01/25/theater/reviews/25misanthrope.html

The Old Masters:

http://theater.nytimes.com/2011/01/28/theater/reviews/28old.html

Twelfth Night:

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/01/26/arts/26iht-LON26.html

Aethelred the Unready:

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/01/27/arts/music/27unready.html
================================================================
OBITUARIES
================================================================
Willi Dansgaard:

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/01/29/world/europe/29dansgaard.html

Jacqueline de Romilly:

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/obituaries/culture-obituaries/books-obituaries/8287232/Jacqueline-de-Romilly.html

Shemaryahu Talmon:

http://www.sbl-site.org/publications/article.aspx?ArticleId=869
================================================================
HUMOUR
================================================================
Latest addition to the family tree:

http://comics.com/frank&ernest/2011-01-29/
================================================================
PODCASTS
================================================================
The Book and the Spade:

http://www.radioscribe.com/bknspade.htm

The Dig:

http://www.thedigradio.com/

Stone Pages Archaeology News:

http://news.stonepages.com/

Archaeologica Audio News:

http://www.archaeologychannel.org/AudioNews.asp

Naked Archaeology Podcast:

http://www.thenakedscientists.com/HTML/podcasts/archaeology/
================================================================
EXPLORATOR is a weekly newsletter representing the fruits of
the labours of 'media research division' of The Atrium. Various
on-line news and magazine sources are scoured for news of the
ancient world (broadly construed: practically anything relating
to archaeology or history prior to about 1700 or so is fair
game) and every Sunday they are delivered to your mailbox free of
charge!
================================================================
Useful Addresses
================================================================
Past issues of Explorator are available on the web via our
Yahoo site:

http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/Explorator/

To subscribe to Explorator, send a blank email message to:

Explorator-subscribe@yahoogroups.com

To unsubscribe, send a blank email message to:

Explorator-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

To send a 'heads up' to the editor or contact him for other
reasons:

rogueclassicist@...
================================================================
Explorator is Copyright (c) 2011 David Meadows. Feel free to
distribute these listings via email to your pals, students,
teachers, etc., but please include this copyright notice. These
links are not to be posted to any website by any means (whether
by direct posting or snagging from a usenet group or some other
email source) without my express written permission. I think it
is only right that I be made aware of public fora which are
making use of content gathered in Explorator. Thanks!
================================================================

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]





[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 82949 From: Cn. Cornelius Lentulus Date: 2011-01-30
Subject: R: [Nova-Roma] Re: The Corvi are leaving
Cn. Lentulus C. Catoni cos. sal.


No "drivel"; my opinion is based on a (relative) longevity of experience here, working with people. That is what I saw, and what I have written that is my conclusion.

There is no mocking the senate, either. You must know that I admire and honor the authority of the senate and the Roman republican principles. What I said it was my EXPERIENCE. I can't deny what I saw or what I heard.

With respect:

Vale, consul!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 82950 From: Cato Date: 2011-01-30
Subject: R: [Nova-Roma] Re: The Corvi are leaving
Cato Lentulo sal.

With equal respect, Lentule, how can you have "heard" what is said in the Senate - or have any "EXPERIENCE" of the Senate - if you are not a member and not part of its discussions?

You said:

"What they did was worth 2000000 times what NR with its lists and senate talks do."

This is quite an indictment of what happens in our Respublica and our Senate; I still say that you are terribly wrong.

I am very happy to hear you re-iterate your loyalty and commitment to the Respublica, and look forward to calling upon your knowledge and intelligence to help us create an even more fertile ground from which may come even more of Nova Roma's children.

Vale,

Cato



--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Cn. Cornelius Lentulus" <cn_corn_lent@...> wrote:
>
> Cn. Lentulus C. Catoni cos. sal.
>
>
> No "drivel"; my opinion is based on a (relative) longevity of experience here, working with people. That is what I saw, and what I have written that is my conclusion.
>
> There is no mocking the senate, either. You must know that I admire and honor the authority of the senate and the Roman republican principles. What I said it was my EXPERIENCE. I can't deny what I saw or what I heard.
>
> With respect:
>
> Vale, consul!
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 82951 From: Gnaeus Iulius Caesar Date: 2011-01-30
Subject: Re: R: [Nova-Roma] Re: The Corvi are leaving
Caesar Catoni sal.

Amice I think Lentulus was subscribed as a "guest" wasn't he last year or
the year before? Besides even if that wasn't the case, the Senate is NR's
own Wikileaks project :) It has more holes in it than the Titanic.

Optime vale



-----Original Message-----
From: Cato
Sent: Sunday, January 30, 2011 1:50 PM
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Subject: R: [Nova-Roma] Re: The Corvi are leaving

Cato Lentulo sal.

With equal respect, Lentule, how can you have "heard" what is said in the
Senate - or have any "EXPERIENCE" of the Senate - if you are not a member
and not part of its discussions?

You said:
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 82952 From: C.Maria Caeca Date: 2011-01-30
Subject: one citizen's perspective and opinions: was:Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: The
Omnibus in foro S. P. D.

What I am going to say represent only my opinions and observations, so value them as you wish, or don't.

As I have said before, often, we have 2 crucial aspects. We have an on line, or virtual presence, and, as I see it, it serves several crucial purposes.

1. the public business of the entire Res Publica is conducted here, which is absolutely necessary, if we are to have officials and representatives from the wide range of our citizens' locations. Sure, as technology develops, we might want to consider such things as web conferencing, etc., so that certain functions can have an immediacy they don't, at this time. However, that will incur other problems, such as managing significantly different time zones, and it will still be virtual communication. I frankly cannot understand that citizens, wherever they are located, would not take an interest in what goes on in our magistracies and in our Senate. What happens in these places effects all of us, or should, and each and every citizen should be not just interested to learn via reports from their Governors ...but should, if possible, take the time to read the discussions and reports concerning them.

2. Ideally, our fora, especially this one, should be used to share information concerning what our Provinces are doing "on the ground", where people, groups, Provinces, etc., could get advice, support, share ideas and experience with others who well may be doing the same things. If one lives thousands of miles away from another group of citizens, it's a bit difficult to offer support to them, if they don't communicate with us. In fact, I am seeing, more and more, Provincial citizens who isolate themselves, make no attempt to make themselves known as individuals, and yet expect to be supported in some way. they expect the hand of friendship to be extended, while they do not either extend their hands, nor accept ours. This, I think, is unfortunate, and at the least, a waste of a resource they, and we, can use to good advantage. Yes, I understand there may be language and accessibility issues, but creative and willing people can usually find ways to work around such things, given enough motivation.

Our virtual fora are also the places where contacts are initially made, and, while most of these contacts are made. True, most of these contacts will be amicable but superficial but it is from these contacts that more personal acquaintances and even friendships develop. To disparage our on line presence as unnecessary or worse is, at best, wasteful of our resources. We can do what our ancient Roman ancestors could not ...have nearly universal and instantaneous communication. We should use that capability to its fullest, but we also must realize that it is one facet of Nova Roma, not its entirety.

The other important facet is what happens in our Provinces. Here is where we, as members of our Provinces get our feet on the ground, so to speak, and can do physical things that will enhance NR, our Provinces, and ourselves. We can, and should, be forming close knit communities that work and play together, attempt projects together, and live, if only for a weekend here and there, our concepts of our roman lives. Hopefully, our closest friendships will be formed here, simply because we are more accessible to one another, more often. there is nothing quite like relaxing over a meal, or building something permanent, or performing a rite together to cement bonds. but this, also is not the entirety of Nova Roma. Once these things have been done, they should be shared with everyone in Nova Roma, because what one Province does successfully may provide a needed model for another province, or give them an idea how they can overcome what seems to be an obstacle in one of their projects.

For me, the bottom line is: How can I interact with you (wherever you are) if I don't know you exist? How can I get to know you, and offer you, (if nothing else) my good wishes and moral support, if you choose to isolate yourself from me?

I would dearly love to see a day when any Novi Romani can travel all over the U.S., South America and Europe, going from one NR community to the next, knowing that he/she will find a warm welcome, and be a citizen among citizens, but that will *only* happen when citizens invest in *both* crucial facets of this Res Publica, I think.

Valete bene,
C. Maria Caeca

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 82953 From: Cn. Cornelius Lentulus Date: 2011-01-30
Subject: R: [Nova-Roma] Re: The Corvi are leaving
Cn. Lentulus C. Catoni cos. sal.
 
 
>>> With equal respect, Lentule, how can you have "heard" what is said in the Senate - or have any "EXPERIENCE" of the Senate - if you are not a member and not part of its discussions? <<<<
 
 
With the verb "hear", my sentence was referring to hearing the provincial citizens, not the senate. I wanted to outline that I talked about what my experience was with talking about many different provincially active citizens, including the Sarmatians. But I did visit other provinces as well, I was also visited by citizens from other provinces, and through internet means of communication I continue extended exchanges of letters with several citizens from many provinces. I was reffering to my experience from these communications.
BTW, I COULD HAVE referred to the senate, too, (but I did not); because I was invited to the senate list two times. Once when I was appointed senator, and the other time when I was asked to find the 2010 Budget Table and to publish it. And I saw the work in the senate, as well as it's archives. But, I repeat, you misunderstood the "hear", which was hearing citizens, and not hearing the senate.


>>>> "What they did was worth 2000000 times what NR with its lists and senate talks do."

This is quite an indictment of what happens in our Respublica and our Senate; I still say that you are terribly wrong. >>>>
 
 
Despite the number which is rhetorics, I sustain the fact that the policy of the senate in NR has until today been very unsuccesful,  ineffective, and not productive. I remember of no really successful progress or productiveness carried out by the senate, at lease since a big while. I put the Sarmatians into the contrast of it. They did started to estable temple and even a colony, they founded our FIRST municipium, they maintain a BIG New Roman real life community. They achieved it without real NR help (they did not even used the attractiveness of the English NR website, which the Ukrainians and Russians generally can't read, because they recruited in real life events, in clubs, streets, and especially through families and friends. After the Sarmatian leading citizens, especially Corvus, had recruited a person in a real life contact event, he directed to this person to their Ukrainian Russian forum, and when they found the person to be dedicated, they
directed the person to the citizenship application form.
 
I attest they did use Nova Roma, or did not get great advantage from the trademark. It was the contrary, we got advantage by having them woring for us. Gosh, Corvus already HAD a small Roman group when he joined NR. They just continued that, but now enlarging NR with the new numbers and enriching NR by the new events, rituals, and community.
 
My case is similar to that, in a small extent: I too came to NR with an already existing small Roman group. It is these connections which help me to manage a successful NR province, there are almost no citizens coming from the website. Almost all of the new Pannoni come from our real life events and recruitment. We don't use NR. We offer ourselves and our activities FOR NR, as what we here do we stamp it as NR activity, without directions, assets, or guidance from the center. Of course, there are people who question this: why do we go under the flag of NR if it's us here who do everything from our own forces. Why don't we get an own trademark to get credit for our own deeds. I answer to these questions that it worths EVERYTHING that we can call ourselves part of a New Roman Republic and its Nation and People, the Citizenry. It worths all work and all sufferening and sacrifices for being blessed by the honor to call ourselves A NOVA ROMAN. Then they
say "you are a fanatic, Lentule", then I say "I'm a Roman and a Nova Roman." Currently it's enough here, in Pannonia, to close this debate. But there comes a day, when those who are "less fanatic" will not be satisfied with this answer, and they will say they want "some tangible advantage from being in Nova Roma, other than just having the right to call ourselves a NRoman".
 
I think it is an important issue to address. We have to retain our best workers, and "the HOW" should be a pertinent topic in the forum and in the senate to discuss.

 




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 82954 From: Delphicapollo Date: 2011-01-30
Subject: Re: R: [Nova-Roma] Re: The Corvi are leaving
Oh come now!
The Titanic rally just had one BIG hole!
You can find a better metaphor than that.
How about the battleship Bismarck? Lots of holes there!

Vale
Troianus

Sent from my iPhone

On Jan 30, 2011, at 3:57 PM, "Gnaeus Iulius Caesar" <gn_iulius_caesar@...
> wrote:

> Caesar Catoni sal.
>
> Amice I think Lentulus was subscribed as a "guest" wasn't he last
> year or
> the year before? Besides even if that wasn't the case, the Senate is
> NR's
> own Wikileaks project :) It has more holes in it than the Titanic.
>
> Optime vale
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Cato
> Sent: Sunday, January 30, 2011 1:50 PM
> To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: R: [Nova-Roma] Re: The Corvi are leaving
>
> Cato Lentulo sal.
>
> With equal respect, Lentule, how can you have "heard" what is said
> in the
> Senate - or have any "EXPERIENCE" of the Senate - if you are not a
> member
> and not part of its discussions?
>
> You said:
>
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 82955 From: Gnaeus Iulius Caesar Date: 2011-01-30
Subject: Re: The Corvi are leaving
Caesar Troiano sal

No, didn't they discover it was actually a series of smaller holes? I think
the one big hole theory has been discounted. I'm not sure the Senate wants
to be thought of as the Bismarck either <lol>...

Optime vale

-----Original Message-----
From: Delphicapollo
Sent: Sunday, January 30, 2011 2:35 PM
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: R: [Nova-Roma] Re: The Corvi are leaving

Oh come now!
The Titanic rally just had one BIG hole!
You can find a better metaphor than that.
How about the battleship Bismarck? Lots of holes there!

Vale
Troianus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 82956 From: publiusalbucius Date: 2011-01-30
Subject: Bismarck holes
Caesari Troiano s.d.

No, really, for James Cameron's documentary well showed that the Bismarck suffered no letal shoot (the big one has not damaged the vital parts of the ship), and has been probably sunk by its crew.

Concerning the Senate, I may confirm that the Senate cannot be the Bismarck : this said, our equivalences of the King George V, the Sheffield, the Rodney and the Dorsetshire have been sunk last year by NR Kriegsmarine... ;-)

Valete,


Albucius csr
procos.



--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Gnaeus Iulius Caesar" <gn_iulius_caesar@...> wrote:
>
> Caesar Troiano sal
>
> No, didn't they discover it was actually a series of smaller holes? I think
> the one big hole theory has been discounted. I'm not sure the Senate wants
> to be thought of as the Bismarck either <lol>...
>
> Optime vale
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Delphicapollo
> Sent: Sunday, January 30, 2011 2:35 PM
> To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: Re: R: [Nova-Roma] Re: The Corvi are leaving
>
> Oh come now!
> The Titanic rally just had one BIG hole!
> You can find a better metaphor than that.
> How about the battleship Bismarck? Lots of holes there!
>
> Vale
> Troianus
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 82957 From: Gnaeus Iulius Caesar Date: 2011-01-30
Subject: Re: Bismarck holes
Caesar Albucio sal

Ahh amice its that Napoleonic side of you coming out ;) The Royal Navy sunk?
Never :)

I think it was the other way around. A large powerful ship confidently and
arrogantly pushing everything out of the way, until an antiquated bi-plane
unexpectedly dropped a torpedo that caused it to go around and around in
circles, and then a series of unexpected hits until its crew decided to pull
the plug out and sink themselves, only to surface a couple of months later,
shrunken, bits fallen off it and stuffed full of admirals and captains, with
a different name painted on the stern ;)

Optime vale


-----Original Message-----
From: publiusalbucius
Sent: Sunday, January 30, 2011 7:31 PM
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Bismarck holes

Caesari Troiano s.d.

No, really, for James Cameron's documentary well showed that the Bismarck
suffered no letal shoot (the big one has not damaged the vital parts of the
ship), and has been probably sunk by its crew.

Concerning the Senate, I may confirm that the Senate cannot be the Bismarck
: this said, our equivalences of the King George V, the Sheffield, the
Rodney and the Dorsetshire have been sunk last year by NR Kriegsmarine...
;-)

Valete,


Albucius csr
procos.

/
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 82958 From: Maxima Valeria Messallina Date: 2011-01-30
Subject: Re: CORVI ARE LEAVING
<<--- On Sat, 1/29/11, QFabiusMaxmi@... <QFabiusMaxmi@...> wrote:

[snipped]
 
 
I realize that you are new Cornelius Lentelus...>
 
 
New? What are you talking about? Lentulus joined NR the same year Gn. Iulius Caesar, current Praetor, joined, which was the same year I joined. We are not "new" to NR.
 
Maxima Valeria Messallina




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 82959 From: Cn. Iulius Caesar Date: 2011-01-30
Subject: Re: CORVI ARE LEAVING
Caesar Messallinae sal.

How time flies when we are enjoying ourselves, no? ;) Fabius is positively ancient in NR terms, so the memory fades after awhile with all these young'uns joining and resigning.

The Macellum should sell Geritol.

Optime vale


--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Maxima Valeria Messallina <maximavaleriamessallina@...> wrote:
>
> <<--- On Sat, 1/29/11, QFabiusMaxmi@... <QFabiusMaxmi@...> wrote:
>
> [snipped]
>  
>  
> I realize that you are new Cornelius Lentelus...>
>  
>  
> New? What are you talking about? Lentulus joined NR the same year Gn. Iulius Caesar, current Praetor, joined, which was the same year I joined. We are not "new" to NR.
>  
> Maxima Valeria Messallina
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 82960 From: Maxima Valeria Messallina Date: 2011-01-30
Subject: Re: The Corvi are leaving
Gratias tibi ago, Lentulus, for saying what needed to be said.
 
Maxima Valeria Messallina
 

--- On Sun, 1/30/11, Cn. Cornelius Lentulus <cn_corn_lent@...> wrote:


From: Cn. Cornelius Lentulus <cn_corn_lent@...>
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: The Corvi are leaving
To: BackAlley@yahoogroups.com
Cc: "Nova Roma ML" <nova-roma@yahoogroups.com>
Date: Sunday, January 30, 2011, 2:48 AM


 



Salvete!

The problem is that they made NR real. What they did was worth 2000000 times what NR with its lists and senate talks do. If you saw their activities, you know that. The Sarmatian local NR groups have city level meeting each week, and from time to time they have meetings with 20-30 real life NRomans. They started to move together and they are planning to live together in vicinity. Their community is a large, vivid real life daily Roman and cultor community. They are REALIZING the goals of NR themselves.
Why Corvus is really leaving is that while they do all these things, they get zero incentives, (almost) zero support, and Nova Roma, as a whole, does not and did never address effectively their work and their efforts - helping them really.

What they did, what they achieved (which is actually more than what NR achieved centrally during all its existence), they did achieve it alone, Nova Roma gave nothing but its name.

Why would they want to continue here? Especially if another group emerges that promises that it will help and support them better?

I have a different approach than Corvus. I say NR is my fatherland and I have to serve it until death. Corvus and the Sarmatians are more pragmatic and say we expect something from NR. We are working on its goals, we move ahead with realizing its goals, and where are the consuls, and the senate? They never ask anything, they never contact us, they don't give anything, etc.

It's more complex than just "friends not in power anymore, then I leave".

Check our history. Whenever we get a really really active group, they leave NR when they see they can get no advantage but disadvantage from being associated. The Britanni (the old active team) left. The Italians left almost altogether and they are now managing a very successful group Pomerium. They are really successful and productive there. All that was intended by them to promote activity in NR. They got no positive cooperation and collaboration from central NR, they started their own thing. Now they thrive, and we are less with dozens of active Italians. That happened with Hispania. They had a full NR associated legion! regular meetings! Life! They left, and Hispania is just a shadow since years. Sarmatia was far far the most successful province amongst all of them. Will they leave as a group. very likely to happen after their leading family left. The once active Brazilians, where are they? My province Pannonia does quite well, too. But I find
increasing difficulty in explaining why we should adhere to NR because dissatisfied voices are more and more frequent. The Germani already disappeared. I could go on.

So, one word:

The problem is very old, and it's very serious. Nova Roma must change in handling the provinces and people's efforts, so that they don't feel left alone and neglected. Nova Roma must give something, not currency or century points, something REAL to those who actually work and achieve things.

We can see from our history that simply allowing to them to "be a citizen and to use the honor to call themselves Nova Roman" is not enough to keep people working and around.

VALETE!
Lentulus

--- Dom 30/1/11, gualterus_graecus <waltms1@...> ha scritto:

Da: gualterus_graecus <waltms1@...>
Oggetto: Re: [BackAlley]The Corvi are leaving
A: BackAlley@yahoogroups.com
Data: Domenica 30 gennaio 2011, 07:45

 

In addition to being corrupt, he flaked out of all of his official duties. Who wants to have a person around who breaks his oaths of office over and over? I say good riddance!

-Gualterus

--- In BackAlley@yahoogroups.com, Delphicapollo <delphicapollo@...> wrote:

>

> Silly reason to leave, and he didn't sound silly, so I doubt that's

> it. After all: Politics change. The winds will blow the other way some

> day. They always do.

>

> Vale

> - Troi

>

> Sent from my iPhone

>

> On Jan 29, 2011, at 11:29 PM, QFabiusMaxmi@... wrote:

>

> >

> > Gee what a surprise! Guess since their friends aren't in power and

> > won't be giving them any more money, no reason to stay.

> >

> > What a bunch of a-holes! Good riddance Like Vado, easy to steal

> > and run away and not stick it out.

> >

> > Fabius

> >

>

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]











[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 82961 From: Delphicapollo Date: 2011-01-30
Subject: Re: Bismarck holes
What about the Hood?
How about the Repulse and the Prince of Wales?

- Troianus


Sent from my iPhone

On Jan 30, 2011, at 10:22 PM, "Gnaeus Iulius Caesar" <gn_iulius_caesar@...
> wrote:

> Caesar Albucio sal
>
> Ahh amice its that Napoleonic side of you coming out ;) The Royal
> Navy sunk?
> Never :)
>
> I think it was the other way around. A large powerful ship
> confidently and
> arrogantly pushing everything out of the way, until an antiquated bi-
> plane
> unexpectedly dropped a torpedo that caused it to go around and
> around in
> circles, and then a series of unexpected hits until its crew decided
> to pull
> the plug out and sink themselves, only to surface a couple of months
> later,
> shrunken, bits fallen off it and stuffed full of admirals and
> captains, with
> a different name painted on the stern ;)
>
> Optime vale
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: publiusalbucius
> Sent: Sunday, January 30, 2011 7:31 PM
> To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [Nova-Roma] Bismarck holes
>
> Caesari Troiano s.d.
>
> No, really, for James Cameron's documentary well showed that the
> Bismarck
> suffered no letal shoot (the big one has not damaged the vital parts
> of the
> ship), and has been probably sunk by its crew.
>
> Concerning the Senate, I may confirm that the Senate cannot be the
> Bismarck
> : this said, our equivalences of the King George V, the Sheffield, the
> Rodney and the Dorsetshire have been sunk last year by NR
> Kriegsmarine...
> ;-)
>
> Valete,
>
> Albucius csr
> procos.
>
> /
>
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 82962 From: QFabiusMaxmi@aol.com Date: 2011-01-30
Subject: Re: CORVI ARE LEAVING
In a message dated 1/30/2011 7:26:24 P.M. Pacific Standard Time,
maximavaleriamessallina@... writes:

New? What are you talking about? Lentulus joined NR the same year Gn.
Iulius Caesar, current Praetor, joined, which was the same year I joined. We
are not "new" to NR.

Salvete et Salve Valerie
I joined in October 1998. I weathered the anti Christian flap in Dec
1998, Constitutional Wars 1999,
the Gender issue 2000, the Sons of Dignity democratic pusch, the Ides of
March walkout in 2001,
I could go on, but in Nova Roma terms Lentulus is a baby. I did not even
see him posting until 2006.

I have been involved in Nova Roma all that time, and have pretty much been
in the center of activities.

Which bring us to you. Why are you picking a fight with me, except you
enjoy picking fights? Lentulus was here long enough to realize people come
and they go.
I argued against you being Tribune, and look how well that turned out.
One could almost say I was far seeing like the divine Archer, except it
wasn't that much of stretch.

Valete
Q Fabius Maximus


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 82963 From: Gnaeus Iulius Caesar Date: 2011-01-30
Subject: Re: Bismarck holes
Salve Troiane.

Well it wasn't a one sided issue, until the end :) Reversals occurred but
ultimately the matter was decided.

Vale bene
Caesar

-----Original Message-----
From: Delphicapollo
Sent: Sunday, January 30, 2011 8:50 PM
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Bismarck holes

What about the Hood?
How about the Repulse and the Prince of Wales?

- Troianus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 82964 From: Maxima Valeria Messallina Date: 2011-01-30
Subject: Re: CORVI ARE LEAVING
 





<<--- On Sun, 1/30/11, QFabiusMaxmi@... <QFabiusMaxmi@...> wrote:
 
I could go on, but in Nova Roma terms Lentulus is a baby. I did not even
see him posting until 2006.>>
 
 
Lentulus is not a baby, he is a grown man, in "Nova Roma terms", whatever that is, or in any terms. And he was active from the moment he arrived. If you didn't see him posting until 2006, then I think that says something about how "active" you supposedly were at the time.
 

 
<<Which bring us to you. Why are you picking a fight with me, >>
 
 
 
Was I "picking a fight" with you? I don't think so. I was simply pointed out your error.
 
 

 
<<I argued against you being Tribune, and look how well that turned out.
One could almost say I was far seeing like the divine Archer, except it
wasn't that much of stretch.>>
 
 
 
You never argued against my being a Tribune - no one did. The "arguing" did not start until I offered to become governor - thus unseating you, but your friends were very loyal and rallied to your side and thus, the, uh, "arguing" commenced.
 
As for what your ability to "far see", well, I have that lovely email from you:
 
 
--- On Wed, 6/9/10, Qfabiusmaxmi@... <Qfabiusmaxmi@...> wrote:


From: Qfabiusmaxmi@... <Qfabiusmaxmi@...>
Subject: Domina who Vestal favors
To: maximavaleriamessallina@...
Date: Wednesday, June 9, 2010, 2:45 AM



 Maxima Valeria Messallina
I believe the Gods allow things to happen that we cannot hope to understand.  I was against you standing for Tribune because of the Vestalship.  I was wrong, and the Gods were right.  You were the right person at the right time, and your decisive action following the amazing chain of events upheld the Constitution as Tribunes were intended to do.
 
 
Nova Roma gives thanks you have her gratitude and mine as well.  Vesta must smile at her handmaiden.
 
Joyous Holiday 
 
Q. Fabius Maximus
 
 
Aww, such kind words. I will treasure them always.
 
Vale bene,
 
Maxima Valeria Messallina




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 82965 From: Delphicapollo Date: 2011-01-30
Subject: Re: Bismarck holes
Salve Caesar

Yes, a good clean Victory, good guys vs. bad guys where the good
guys won.

So much better than Jutland - people can argue both sides on that
one forever!

Vale
Troianus

Sent from my iPhone

On Jan 30, 2011, at 11:26 PM, "Gnaeus Iulius Caesar" <gn_iulius_caesar@...
> wrote:

> Salve Troiane.
>
> Well it wasn't a one sided issue, until the end :) Reversals
> occurred but
> ultimately the matter was decided.
>
> Vale bene
> Caesar
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Delphicapollo
> Sent: Sunday, January 30, 2011 8:50 PM
> To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Bismarck holes
>
> What about the Hood?
> How about the Repulse and the Prince of Wales?
>
> - Troianus
>
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 82966 From: Maxima Valeria Messallina Date: 2011-01-31
Subject: Re: CORVI ARE LEAVING
<<--- On Sun, 1/30/11, Cn. Iulius Caesar <gn_iulius_caesar@...> wrote:
Caesar Messallinae sal.>>
 
 
Ave, Caesar

<<How time flies when we are enjoying ourselves, no? ;) Fabius is positively ancient in NR terms, so the memory fades after awhile with all these young'uns joining and resigning.

The Macellum should sell Geritol.>>
 
 
LOL If NR could get some commission on that, hey, why not?


<<Optime vale>>
 
Optime vale,
 
MVM
 




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 82967 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2011-01-31
Subject: Re: one citizen's perspective and opinions: was:Re: [Nova-Roma] Re:
>
> A. Tullia Scholastica C. Mariae Caecae quiritibus bonae voluntatis S.P.D.
>
>
>
> Omnibus in foro S. P. D.
>
> What I am going to say represent only my opinions and observations, so value
> them as you wish, or don't.
>
> As I have said before, often, we have 2 crucial aspects. We have an on line,
> or virtual presence, and, as I see it, it serves several crucial purposes.
>
> 1. the public business of the entire Res Publica is conducted here, which is
> absolutely necessary, if we are to have officials and representatives from the
> wide range of our citizens' locations. Sure, as technology develops, we might
> want to consider such things as web conferencing, etc., so that certain
> functions can have an immediacy they don't, at this time. However, that will
> incur other problems, such as managing significantly different time zones,


ATS: And significantly different schedules, as well
as technological issues. Not everyone has the ability to do web
conferencing, and not everyone has fast connections, and not everyone has
access on weekends, etc., etc.

and it will still be virtual communication. I frankly cannot understand
that citizens, wherever they are located, would not take an interest in what
goes on in our magistracies and in our Senate.

ATS: A good many of our citizens have no interest
whatsoever in politics. Several of our legionary reenactors fall into this
camp, and so does a certain colleague of mine. The majority of citizens are
inactive, and never heard from once they pass their tirocinium. They are
content to sink into the background, and live their macro lives.


What happens in these places effects all of us, or should, and each and
every citizen should be not just interested to learn via reports from their
Governors ...but should, if possible, take the time to read the discussions
and reports concerning them.
>
> 2. Ideally, our fora, especially this one, should be used to share
> information concerning what our Provinces are doing "on the ground", where
> people, groups, Provinces, etc., could get advice, support, share ideas and
> experience with others who well may be doing the same things. If one lives
> thousands of miles away from another group of citizens, it's a bit difficult
> to offer support to them, if they don't communicate with us.
>
> ATS: Well, yes. If they did, however, what would happen?
>
>
> In fact, I am seeing, more and more, Provincial citizens who isolate
> themselves, make no attempt to make themselves known as individuals, and yet
> expect to be supported in some way.
>
> ATS: I don¹t think that this is the case, at least not deliberately.
>
>
> they expect the hand of friendship to be extended, while they do not either
> extend their hands, nor accept ours. This, I think, is unfortunate, and at
> the least, a waste of a resource they, and we, can use to good advantage.
> Yes, I understand there may be language and accessibility issues, but creative
> and willing people can usually find ways to work around s uch things, given
> enough motivation.
>
> ATS: That may not be the case. This is difficult for those who are not
> reasonably fluent in English, or for those who have little or no access. I
> doubt that English was a popular subject in Eastern Europe in the days of the
> Iron Curtain, and some others never behind it hate English. Too, there are
> those here who would just as soon see all non-English speakers take a hike,
> which is not exactly welcoming on either side.
>
> Our virtual fora are also the places where contacts are initially made, and,
> while most of these contacts are made. True, most of these contacts will be
> amicable but superficial but it is from these contacts that more personal
> acquaintances and even friendships develop. To disparage our on line presence
> as unnecessary or worse is, at best, wasteful of our resources. We can do
> what our ancient Roman ancestors could not ...have nearly universal and
> instantaneous communication. We should use that capability to its fullest,
> but we also must realize that it is one facet of Nova Roma, not its entirety.
>
> The other important facet is what happens in our Provinces. Here is where we,
> as members of our Provinces get our feet on the ground, so to speak, and can
> do physical things that will enhance NR, our Provinces, and ourselves.
>
> ATS: That may be the case in certain areas, especially non-English
> speaking ones. I learned about Nova Roma at a reenactment event, the first I
> had attended...but thought that this was a merchant group. Only later did I
> find out that NR was a cultural organization with a Roman government. That
> attracted me, and continues to do so.
>
> As for provincial activities, I think that something like four people came
> to one dinner in the Maryland area, and ten came to a consular dinner in NYC.
> There was one other event in NJ. Other efforts seem to have failed.
>
>
> We can, and should, be forming close knit communities that work and play
> together, attempt projects together, and live, if only for a weekend here and
> there, our concepts of our roman lives.
>
> ATS: That would be nice...but reality often intrudes.
>
>
> Hopefully, our closest friendships will be formed here, simply because we are
> more accessible to one another, more often. there is nothing quite like
> relaxing over a meal, or building something permanent, or performing a rite
> together to cement bonds. but this, also is not the entirety of Nova Roma.
> Once these things have been done, they should be shared with everyone in Nova
> Roma, because what one Province does successfully may provide a needed model
> for another province, or give them an idea how they can overcome what seems to
> be an obstacle in one of their p rojects.
>
> For me, the bottom line is: How can I interact with you (wherever you are) if
> I don't know you exist? How can I get to know you, and offer you, (if nothing
> else) my good wishes and moral support, if you choose to isolate yourself from
> me?
>
> ATS: I don¹t think that this is a conscious choice on the part of many.
> Those who have to work full time, deal with spouses and children, tend to
> ailing relatives, etc., have little time for outside pursuits.
>
>
> I would dearly love to see a day when any Novi Romani can travel all over the
> U.S., South America and Europe, going from one NR community to the next,
> knowing that he/she will find a warm welcome, and be a citizen among citizens,
>
> ATS: That would be nice...and probably a lot like the original, too.
> Rome had a lot of turf to her name. Remember, however, that we have citizens
> in places the Romans never went, including the Orient and chunks of Africa.
> Australia and Singapore and Japan are just a bit far from many of us. So is
> Pretoria. ;-)
>
>
> but that will *only* happen when citizens invest in *both* crucial facets of
> this Res Publica, I think.
>
> Valete bene,
> C. Maria Caeca
>
>
> Vale, et valete.




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 82968 From: Cato Date: 2011-01-31
Subject: prid. Kal. Feb.
Cato omnibus in foro SPD

Hodiernus dies est pridie Kalendas Februarius; haec dies comitialis est.


"The last branch of the ordinances of Numa related to the sacred
offices allotted to those who held the higher priest and the greatest
power among the Romans. These, from one of the duties they perform,
namely, the repairing of the wooden bridge, are in their own language
called pontifices; but they have jurisdiction over the most weighty
matters. For they the judges in all religious causes wherein private
citizens, magistrates or the ministers of the gods are concerned; they
make laws for the observance of any religious rites, not established
by written law or custom, which may seem to them worthy of receiving
the sanction of law and custom; they inquire into the conduct of all
magistrates to whom the performance of any sacrifice or other
religious duty is committed, and also into that of all the priests;
they take care that their servants and ministers whom they employ in
religious rites commit no error in the matter of the sacred laws; to
the laymen who are unacquainted with such matters they are the
expounder stone interpreters of everything relating to the worship of
the gods and genii; and if they find that any disobey their orders,
they inflict punishment upon them with due regard to every offence;
moreover, they are not liable to any prosecution or punishment, nor
are they accountable to the senate or to the people, at least
concerning religious matters. Hence, if anyone wishes to call them
hierodidaskaloi, hieronomoi, hierophylakes, or, as I think proper,
hierophantai, he will not be in error. When one of them dies, another
is appointed in his place, being chosen, not by the people, but by the
pontifices themselves, who select the person they think best qualified
among their fellow citizens; and the one thus approved of receives the
priesthood, provided the omens are favourable to them. These — not to
speak of others less important — are the greatest and the most notable
regulations made by Numa concerning religious worship and divided by
him according to the different classes of sacred rites; and through
these it came about that the city increased in piety." - Dionysius of
Halicarnassus, "Roman Antiquities" 2.73


"Jason bathed his tender body reverently in the sacred river; and
round him he placed a dark robe [and] he cut the throat of the sheep,
and duly placed the carcase above; and he kindled the logs placing
fire beneath, and poured over them mingled libations, calling on
Hecate to aid him in the contests. And when he had called on her he
drew back; and she heard him, the dread goddess, from the uttermost
depths and came to the sacrifice of Aeson's son [Jason]; and round her
horrible serpents twined themselves among the oak boughs; and there
was a gleam of countless torches; and sharply howled around her the
hounds of hell. All the meadows trembled at her step; and the nymphs
that haunt the marsh and the river shrieked, all who dance around that
mead of Amarantian Phasis. And fear seized Aeson's son, but not even
so did he turn round as his feet bore him forth, till he came back to
his comrades." - Apollonius Rhodius, "Argonautica"

"Also she bare Asteria of happy name, whom Perses once
led to his great house to be called his dear wife. And she
conceived and bare Hecate whom Zeus the son of Cronos honoured
above all. He gave her splendid gifts, to have a share of the
earth and the unfruitful sea. She received honour also in starry
heaven, and is honoured exceedingly by the deathless gods. For
to this day, whenever any one of men on earth offers rich
sacrifices and prays for favour according to custom, he calls
upon Hecate. Great honour comes full easily to him whose prayers
the goddess receives favourably, and she bestows wealth upon him;
for the power surely is with her. For as many as were born of
Earth and Ocean amongst all these she has her due portion. The
son of Cronos did her no wrong nor took anything away of all that
was her portion among the former Titan gods: but she holds, as
the division was at the first from the beginning, privilege both
in earth, and in heaven, and in sea. Also, because she is an
only child, the goddess receives not less honour, but much more
still, for Zeus honours her. Whom she will she greatly aids and
advances: she sits by worshipful kings in judgement, and in the
assembly whom she will is distinguished among the people. And
when men arm themselves for the battle that destroys men, then
the goddess is at hand to give victory and grant glory readily to
whom she will. Good is she also when men contend at the games,
for there too the goddess is with them and profits them: and he
who by might and strength gets the victory wins the rich prize
easily with joy, and brings glory to his parents. And she is
good to stand by horsemen, whom she will: and to those whose
business is in the grey discomfortable sea, and who pray to
Hecate and the loud-crashing Earth-Shaker, easily the glorious
goddess gives great catch, and easily she takes it away as soon
as seen, if so she will. She is good in the byre with Hermes to
increase the stock. The droves of kine and wide herds of goats
and flocks of fleecy sheep, if she will, she increases from a
few, or makes many to be less. So, then. albeit her mother's
only child, she is honoured amongst all the deathless gods.
And the son of Cronos made her a nurse of the young who after
that day saw with their eyes the light of all-seeing Dawn. So
from the beginning she is a nurse of the young, and these are her
honours." - Hesiod, "Theogony" II 404-452

Today was celebrated in honor of the goddess Hekate. Hecate was a
popular and ubiquitous goddess from the time of Hesiod until late
antiquity. She emerges by the 5th century B.C. as a more sinister
divine figure associated with magic and witchcraft, lunar lore and
creatures of the night, dog sacrifices and illuminated caves, as well
as doorways and crossroads. She is known by many titles, among them:

1. Hekate Propylaia -- "the one before the gate" -- a guardian goddess
whose statue was often at the entrance to major temples of other
deities, primarily Demeter, or at the entrance to private homes
2. Hekate Propolos -- "the attendant who leads" -- a personal
attendant and guide, the most famous example of which is when She
leads Persephone back to Demeter from the Underworld
3. Hekate Phosphoros -- "the light bringer" -- a torch-bearer
(probably related to her role as guide, especially one who guides and
attends initiates at the Mysteries, such as the Eleusinian Mysteries);
while other deities carried a single torch, Hekate was most
prominently associated with torch-bearing, and unlike the others, She
usually carried two; though later sources identify Her as a moon
goddess (and say the torches are a symbol of Her connection with night
and the moonlight). Her early role as torch-bearer has no such
connection, though they might refer to the Morning and Evening stars
(Venus).
4. Hekate Kourotrophos -- "child's nurse" -- a title applied to nearly
all Greek goddesses and to a few Greek gods; specifically applied to
those who govern childbirth; it may refer to a maternal caring for all
mortal beings and may possibly refer to caring for women specifically

The first three of these are Her most distinctive functions, and
generally involve attending upon more prominent deities such as
Demeter, Persephone, Artemis, and Kybele. Individually they are not
unique to Her, but no other deity can claim all of them. The last two
titles, on the other hand, are shared with numerous other deities. It
does not seem possible to rank these functions as to their importance;
different ones were emphasised at different times and locations.
Hecate was the chief goddess presiding over magic and spells. She
witnessed the abduction of Demeter's daughter Persephone to the
underworld and, torch in hand, assisted in the search for her. Thus,
pillars called Hecataea stood at crossroads and doorways, perhaps to
keep away evil spirits. Hecate was represented as single-formed, clad
in a long robe, holding burning torches; in later representations she
was triple-formed, with three bodies standing back to back, probably
so that she could look in all directions at once from the crossroads.
Because of this she is sometimes referred to as the Triple Goddess.


Valete bene!

Cato
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 82969 From: publiusalbucius Date: 2011-01-31
Subject: Re: Bismarck holes
Caesari s.d.

Ah, I see that your emotional world, keeping being focused, instead of reasoning as an objective Roman, on the nostalgy being the heir of one of the most beautiful jewels of the Queen's crown, has mistaken you.

I had just kept the frame of the comparison proposed by Troianus : *if* our Senate *was* the Bismarck, it would be a still floating one, and which would have sunk, last year, the group of conspirators who tried to sink it... ;-).

Vale bene,


Albucius


--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Gnaeus Iulius Caesar" <gn_iulius_caesar@...> wrote:
>
> Caesar Albucio sal
>
> Ahh amice its that Napoleonic side of you coming out ;) The Royal Navy sunk?
> Never :)
>
> I think it was the other way around. A large powerful ship confidently and
> arrogantly pushing everything out of the way, until an antiquated bi-plane
> unexpectedly dropped a torpedo that caused it to go around and around in
> circles, and then a series of unexpected hits until its crew decided to pull
> the plug out and sink themselves, only to surface a couple of months later,
> shrunken, bits fallen off it and stuffed full of admirals and captains, with
> a different name painted on the stern ;)
>
> Optime vale
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: publiusalbucius
> Sent: Sunday, January 30, 2011 7:31 PM
> To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [Nova-Roma] Bismarck holes
>
> Caesari Troiano s.d.
>
> No, really, for James Cameron's documentary well showed that the Bismarck
> suffered no letal shoot (the big one has not damaged the vital parts of the
> ship), and has been probably sunk by its crew.
>
> Concerning the Senate, I may confirm that the Senate cannot be the Bismarck
> : this said, our equivalences of the King George V, the Sheffield, the
> Rodney and the Dorsetshire have been sunk last year by NR Kriegsmarine...
> ;-)
>
> Valete,
>
>
> Albucius csr
> procos.
>
> /
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 82970 From: Timothy or Stephen Gallagher Date: 2011-01-31
Subject: Roman fiction
Salvete

With so much Roman fiction to draw on why have none of the leading series ever made it to the small or big screen?

Valete

Paulinus


The Roma Sub Rosa series (1991�2005) by Steven Saylor, starts with Roman Blood (1991); the books cover the period 80 BC to 48 BC.
The Marcus Didius Falco series by Lindsey Davis, starts with The Silver Pigs; set in the reign of Vespasian.
The SPQR series by John Maddox Roberts.
The I, Claudia series of novels by Marilyn Todd featuring her picaresque heroine Claudia Seferius
The Publius Aurelius series by Danila Comastri Montanari
The Marcus Corvinus series by David Wishart
Roman Justice: SPQR: Too Roman To Handle, by Anne Hart
The Roman Mysteries young adults' detective/drama series by Caroline Lawrence
The Caius Trilogy by German author Henry Winterfeld: Caius ist ein Dummkopf (Caius is an Idiot); Caius geht ein Licht auf (Caius has an Inspiration), and Caius in der Klemme (Caius in a Fix). The first part was published in English with the alternate title Detectives in Togas. The second was published in English with the alternate title Mystery of the Roman Ransom.
The Third Princess: A Septimus Severus Quistus Roman Mystery by Philip Boast
Rubies of the Viper (2010) by Martha Marks. A Roman woman sets out to uncover the identity of her brother's murderer

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 82971 From: Gaius Date: 2011-01-31
Subject: Re: Roman fiction
Salve amice,

What about Colleen McCullogh's books? What a great movie of two they would make.

Laenas

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, Timothy or Stephen Gallagher <spqr753@...> wrote:
>
>
> Salvete
>
> With so much Roman fiction to draw on why have none of the leading series ever made it to the small or big screen?
>
> Valete
>
> Paulinus
>
>
> The Roma Sub Rosa series (1991–2005) by Steven Saylor, starts with Roman Blood (1991); the books cover the period 80 BC to 48 BC.
> The Marcus Didius Falco series by Lindsey Davis, starts with The Silver Pigs; set in the reign of Vespasian.
> The SPQR series by John Maddox Roberts.
> The I, Claudia series of novels by Marilyn Todd featuring her picaresque heroine Claudia Seferius
> The Publius Aurelius series by Danila Comastri Montanari
> The Marcus Corvinus series by David Wishart
> Roman Justice: SPQR: Too Roman To Handle, by Anne Hart
> The Roman Mysteries young adults' detective/drama series by Caroline Lawrence
> The Caius Trilogy by German author Henry Winterfeld: Caius ist ein Dummkopf (Caius is an Idiot); Caius geht ein Licht auf (Caius has an Inspiration), and Caius in der Klemme (Caius in a Fix). The first part was published in English with the alternate title Detectives in Togas. The second was published in English with the alternate title Mystery of the Roman Ransom.
> The Third Princess: A Septimus Severus Quistus Roman Mystery by Philip Boast
> Rubies of the Viper (2010) by Martha Marks. A Roman woman sets out to uncover the identity of her brother's murderer
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 82972 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2011-01-31
Subject: Re: Roman fiction
Ave!

They already made the Thornbirds into a movie! ;)

On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 11:35 AM, Gaius <gaiuspopillius@...> wrote:

>
>
> Salve amice,
>
> What about Colleen McCullogh's books? What a great movie of two they would
> make.
>
> Laenas
>
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com <Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com>, Timothy or
> Stephen Gallagher <spqr753@...> wrote:
> >
> >
> > Salvete
> >
> > With so much Roman fiction to draw on why have none of the leading series
> ever made it to the small or big screen?
> >
> > Valete
> >
> > Paulinus
> >
> >
> > The Roma Sub Rosa series (1991�2005) by Steven Saylor, starts with Roman
> Blood (1991); the books cover the period 80 BC to 48 BC.
> > The Marcus Didius Falco series by Lindsey Davis, starts with The Silver
> Pigs; set in the reign of Vespasian.
> > The SPQR series by John Maddox Roberts.
> > The I, Claudia series of novels by Marilyn Todd featuring her picaresque
> heroine Claudia Seferius
> > The Publius Aurelius series by Danila Comastri Montanari
> > The Marcus Corvinus series by David Wishart
> > Roman Justice: SPQR: Too Roman To Handle, by Anne Hart
> > The Roman Mysteries young adults' detective/drama series by Caroline
> Lawrence
> > The Caius Trilogy by German author Henry Winterfeld: Caius ist ein
> Dummkopf (Caius is an Idiot); Caius geht ein Licht auf (Caius has an
> Inspiration), and Caius in der Klemme (Caius in a Fix). The first part was
> published in English with the alternate title Detectives in Togas. The
> second was published in English with the alternate title Mystery of the
> Roman Ransom.
> > The Third Princess: A Septimus Severus Quistus Roman Mystery by Philip
> Boast
> > Rubies of the Viper (2010) by Martha Marks. A Roman woman sets out to
> uncover the identity of her brother's murderer
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
>
>
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 82973 From: Lyn Date: 2011-01-31
Subject: Re: Roman fiction
Salve,

I've never understood why McCullough's (Rome) books haven't been turned into
films, or at least Masterpiece Theatre-type programs. And I'll bet C. Maria
Caeca would agree.

:-)

Vale,
L. Aemilia Mamerca

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com [mailto:Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com] On
> Behalf Of Robert Woolwine
> Sent: Monday, January 31, 2011 1:37 PM
> To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: Roman fiction
>
> Ave!
>
> They already made the Thornbirds into a movie! ;)
>
> On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 11:35 AM, Gaius <gaiuspopillius@...> wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > Salve amice,
> >
> > What about Colleen McCullogh's books? What a great movie of two they
would
> > make.
> >
> > Laenas
> >
> >
> > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com <Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com>,
> Timothy or
> > Stephen Gallagher <spqr753@...> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > Salvete
> > >
> > > With so much Roman fiction to draw on why have none of the leading
series
> > ever made it to the small or big screen?
> > >
> > > Valete
> > >
> > > Paulinus
> > >
> > >
> > > The Roma Sub Rosa series (1991-2005) by Steven Saylor, starts with
Roman
> > Blood (1991); the books cover the period 80 BC to 48 BC.
> > > The Marcus Didius Falco series by Lindsey Davis, starts with The
Silver
> > Pigs; set in the reign of Vespasian.
> > > The SPQR series by John Maddox Roberts.
> > > The I, Claudia series of novels by Marilyn Todd featuring her
picaresque
> > heroine Claudia Seferius
> > > The Publius Aurelius series by Danila Comastri Montanari
> > > The Marcus Corvinus series by David Wishart
> > > Roman Justice: SPQR: Too Roman To Handle, by Anne Hart
> > > The Roman Mysteries young adults' detective/drama series by Caroline
> > Lawrence
> > > The Caius Trilogy by German author Henry Winterfeld: Caius ist ein
> > Dummkopf (Caius is an Idiot); Caius geht ein Licht auf (Caius has an
> > Inspiration), and Caius in der Klemme (Caius in a Fix). The first part
was
> > published in English with the alternate title Detectives in Togas. The
> > second was published in English with the alternate title Mystery of the
> > Roman Ransom.
> > > The Third Princess: A Septimus Severus Quistus Roman Mystery by Philip
> > Boast
> > > Rubies of the Viper (2010) by Martha Marks. A Roman woman sets out to
> > uncover the identity of her brother's murderer
> > >
> > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> > >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 82974 From: Cato Date: 2011-01-31
Subject: Re: Roman fiction
Cato omnibus in foro SPD

I'd like to see Robert Harris' "Pompeii" and "Imperium" made into movies.

Valete,

Cato

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Lyn" <ldowling@...> wrote:
>
> Salve,
>
> I've never understood why McCullough's (Rome) books haven't been turned into
> films, or at least Masterpiece Theatre-type programs. And I'll bet C. Maria
> Caeca would agree.
>
> :-)
>
> Vale,
> L. Aemilia Mamerca
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com [mailto:Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com] On
> > Behalf Of Robert Woolwine
> > Sent: Monday, January 31, 2011 1:37 PM
> > To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> > Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: Roman fiction
> >
> > Ave!
> >
> > They already made the Thornbirds into a movie! ;)
> >
> > On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 11:35 AM, Gaius <gaiuspopillius@...> wrote:
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > Salve amice,
> > >
> > > What about Colleen McCullogh's books? What a great movie of two they
> would
> > > make.
> > >
> > > Laenas
> > >
> > >
> > > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com <Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com>,
> > Timothy or
> > > Stephen Gallagher <spqr753@> wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Salvete
> > > >
> > > > With so much Roman fiction to draw on why have none of the leading
> series
> > > ever made it to the small or big screen?
> > > >
> > > > Valete
> > > >
> > > > Paulinus
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > The Roma Sub Rosa series (1991-2005) by Steven Saylor, starts with
> Roman
> > > Blood (1991); the books cover the period 80 BC to 48 BC.
> > > > The Marcus Didius Falco series by Lindsey Davis, starts with The
> Silver
> > > Pigs; set in the reign of Vespasian.
> > > > The SPQR series by John Maddox Roberts.
> > > > The I, Claudia series of novels by Marilyn Todd featuring her
> picaresque
> > > heroine Claudia Seferius
> > > > The Publius Aurelius series by Danila Comastri Montanari
> > > > The Marcus Corvinus series by David Wishart
> > > > Roman Justice: SPQR: Too Roman To Handle, by Anne Hart
> > > > The Roman Mysteries young adults' detective/drama series by Caroline
> > > Lawrence
> > > > The Caius Trilogy by German author Henry Winterfeld: Caius ist ein
> > > Dummkopf (Caius is an Idiot); Caius geht ein Licht auf (Caius has an
> > > Inspiration), and Caius in der Klemme (Caius in a Fix). The first part
> was
> > > published in English with the alternate title Detectives in Togas. The
> > > second was published in English with the alternate title Mystery of the
> > > Roman Ransom.
> > > > The Third Princess: A Septimus Severus Quistus Roman Mystery by Philip
> > > Boast
> > > > Rubies of the Viper (2010) by Martha Marks. A Roman woman sets out to
> > > uncover the identity of her brother's murderer
> > > >
> > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------------
> >
> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 82975 From: GAIUS MARCIUS CRISPUS Date: 2011-01-31
Subject: Re: Roman fiction
Salvete omnes

Not cinemascope, perhaps, but over on Britannia Provincia I am into day 2 of serialising "On the Great Wall" from Rudyard Kipling's "Puck of Pooks Hill".

Just one of the many and varied ways I am trying to stimulate interest in Rome back into Britannia.

Valete omnes
Crispus

--- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Cato" <catoinnyc@...> wrote:
>
> Cato omnibus in foro SPD
>
> I'd like to see Robert Harris' "Pompeii" and "Imperium" made into movies.
>
> Valete,
>
> Cato
>
> --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, "Lyn" <ldowling@> wrote:
> >
> > Salve,
> >
> > I've never understood why McCullough's (Rome) books haven't been turned into
> > films, or at least Masterpiece Theatre-type programs. And I'll bet C. Maria
> > Caeca would agree.
> >
> > :-)
> >
> > Vale,
> > L. Aemilia Mamerca
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com [mailto:Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com] On
> > > Behalf Of Robert Woolwine
> > > Sent: Monday, January 31, 2011 1:37 PM
> > > To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> > > Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: Roman fiction
> > >
> > > Ave!
> > >
> > > They already made the Thornbirds into a movie! ;)
> > >
> > > On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 11:35 AM, Gaius <gaiuspopillius@> wrote:
> > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Salve amice,
> > > >
> > > > What about Colleen McCullogh's books? What a great movie of two they
> > would
> > > > make.
> > > >
> > > > Laenas
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com <Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com>,
> > > Timothy or
> > > > Stephen Gallagher <spqr753@> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Salvete
> > > > >
> > > > > With so much Roman fiction to draw on why have none of the leading
> > series
> > > > ever made it to the small or big screen?
> > > > >
> > > > > Valete
> > > > >
> > > > > Paulinus
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > The Roma Sub Rosa series (1991-2005) by Steven Saylor, starts with
> > Roman
> > > > Blood (1991); the books cover the period 80 BC to 48 BC.
> > > > > The Marcus Didius Falco series by Lindsey Davis, starts with The
> > Silver
> > > > Pigs; set in the reign of Vespasian.
> > > > > The SPQR series by John Maddox Roberts.
> > > > > The I, Claudia series of novels by Marilyn Todd featuring her
> > picaresque
> > > > heroine Claudia Seferius
> > > > > The Publius Aurelius series by Danila Comastri Montanari
> > > > > The Marcus Corvinus series by David Wishart
> > > > > Roman Justice: SPQR: Too Roman To Handle, by Anne Hart
> > > > > The Roman Mysteries young adults' detective/drama series by Caroline
> > > > Lawrence
> > > > > The Caius Trilogy by German author Henry Winterfeld: Caius ist ein
> > > > Dummkopf (Caius is an Idiot); Caius geht ein Licht auf (Caius has an
> > > > Inspiration), and Caius in der Klemme (Caius in a Fix). The first part
> > was
> > > > published in English with the alternate title Detectives in Togas. The
> > > > second was published in English with the alternate title Mystery of the
> > > > Roman Ransom.
> > > > > The Third Princess: A Septimus Severus Quistus Roman Mystery by Philip
> > > > Boast
> > > > > Rubies of the Viper (2010) by Martha Marks. A Roman woman sets out to
> > > > uncover the identity of her brother's murderer
> > > > >
> > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > ------------------------------------
> > >
> > > Yahoo! Groups Links
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
>
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 82976 From: C.Maria Caeca Date: 2011-01-31
Subject: Re: Roman fiction
Caeca Mamerca Sal!

Oh, most definitely!!!!!!! In fact, that should be ...somebody's next project!

Vale Bene!

Caeca, deciding who should play who ...
----- Original Message -----
From: Lyn
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Monday, January 31, 2011 1:48 PM
Subject: RE: [Nova-Roma] Re: Roman fiction



Salve,

I've never understood why McCullough's (Rome) books haven't been turned into
films, or at least Masterpiece Theatre-type programs. And I'll bet C. Maria
Caeca would agree.

:-)

Vale,
L. Aemilia Mamerca

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com [mailto:Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com] On
> Behalf Of Robert Woolwine
> Sent: Monday, January 31, 2011 1:37 PM
> To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: Roman fiction
>
> Ave!
>
> They already made the Thornbirds into a movie! ;)
>
> On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 11:35 AM, Gaius <gaiuspopillius@...> wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > Salve amice,
> >
> > What about Colleen McCullogh's books? What a great movie of two they
would
> > make.
> >
> > Laenas
> >
> >
> > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com <Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com>,
> Timothy or
> > Stephen Gallagher <spqr753@...> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > Salvete
> > >
> > > With so much Roman fiction to draw on why have none of the leading
series
> > ever made it to the small or big screen?
> > >
> > > Valete
> > >
> > > Paulinus
> > >
> > >
> > > The Roma Sub Rosa series (1991-2005) by Steven Saylor, starts with
Roman
> > Blood (1991); the books cover the period 80 BC to 48 BC.
> > > The Marcus Didius Falco series by Lindsey Davis, starts with The
Silver
> > Pigs; set in the reign of Vespasian.
> > > The SPQR series by John Maddox Roberts.
> > > The I, Claudia series of novels by Marilyn Todd featuring her
picaresque
> > heroine Claudia Seferius
> > > The Publius Aurelius series by Danila Comastri Montanari
> > > The Marcus Corvinus series by David Wishart
> > > Roman Justice: SPQR: Too Roman To Handle, by Anne Hart
> > > The Roman Mysteries young adults' detective/drama series by Caroline
> > Lawrence
> > > The Caius Trilogy by German author Henry Winterfeld: Caius ist ein
> > Dummkopf (Caius is an Idiot); Caius geht ein Licht auf (Caius has an
> > Inspiration), and Caius in der Klemme (Caius in a Fix). The first part
was
> > published in English with the alternate title Detectives in Togas. The
> > second was published in English with the alternate title Mystery of the
> > Roman Ransom.
> > > The Third Princess: A Septimus Severus Quistus Roman Mystery by Philip
> > Boast
> > > Rubies of the Viper (2010) by Martha Marks. A Roman woman sets out to
> > uncover the identity of her brother's murderer
> > >
> > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> > >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 82977 From: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com Date: 2011-01-31
Subject: Kalends, 2/1/2011, 12:00 am
Reminder from:   Nova-Roma Yahoo! Group
 
Title:   Kalends
 
Date:   Tuesday February 1, 2011
Time:   All Day
Repeats:   This event repeats every month.
Notes:   Every Kalends is sacred to Juno
"Be well, Queen Juno, look down and preserve us. Accept this offering
of incense and look kindly and favorably upon me and the Senate and
people of Nova Roma."
(Incense is placed in focus)

"Queen Juno, in addition to my virtuous offering of incense, be
honored by this offering of wine that I pour in libation. May you look
kindly and favorably upon the Senate and people of Nova Roma."
(Libation is poured for the Goddess)
 
Copyright © 2011  Yahoo! Inc. All Rights Reserved | Terms of Service | Privacy Policy
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 82978 From: Lyn Date: 2011-01-31
Subject: Re: Roman fiction
Ave Caeca,



Okay, who'll play whom? Go on, then.



Vale bene,

LAM



_____

From: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com [mailto:Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf
Of C.Maria Caeca
Sent: Monday, January 31, 2011 5:43 PM
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: Roman fiction





Caeca Mamerca Sal!

Oh, most definitely!!!!!!! In fact, that should be ...somebody's next
project!

Vale Bene!

Caeca, deciding who should play who ...
----- Original Message -----
From: Lyn
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com <mailto:Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Monday, January 31, 2011 1:48 PM
Subject: RE: [Nova-Roma] Re: Roman fiction

Salve,

I've never understood why McCullough's (Rome) books haven't been turned into
films, or at least Masterpiece Theatre-type programs. And I'll bet C. Maria
Caeca would agree.

:-)

Vale,
L. Aemilia Mamerca

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com <mailto:Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com>
[mailto:Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com <mailto:Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com> ] On
> Behalf Of Robert Woolwine
> Sent: Monday, January 31, 2011 1:37 PM
> To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com <mailto:Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com>
> Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: Roman fiction
>
> Ave!
>
> They already made the Thornbirds into a movie! ;)
>
> On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 11:35 AM, Gaius <gaiuspopillius@...
<mailto:gaiuspopillius%40gmail.com> > wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > Salve amice,
> >
> > What about Colleen McCullogh's books? What a great movie of two they
would
> > make.
> >
> > Laenas
> >
> >
> > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com <mailto:Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com>
<Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com>,
> Timothy or
> > Stephen Gallagher <spqr753@...> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > Salvete
> > >
> > > With so much Roman fiction to draw on why have none of the leading
series
> > ever made it to the small or big screen?
> > >
> > > Valete
> > >
> > > Paulinus
> > >
> > >
> > > The Roma Sub Rosa series (1991-2005) by Steven Saylor, starts with
Roman
> > Blood (1991); the books cover the period 80 BC to 48 BC.
> > > The Marcus Didius Falco series by Lindsey Davis, starts with The
Silver
> > Pigs; set in the reign of Vespasian.
> > > The SPQR series by John Maddox Roberts.
> > > The I, Claudia series of novels by Marilyn Todd featuring her
picaresque
> > heroine Claudia Seferius
> > > The Publius Aurelius series by Danila Comastri Montanari
> > > The Marcus Corvinus series by David Wishart
> > > Roman Justice: SPQR: Too Roman To Handle, by Anne Hart
> > > The Roman Mysteries young adults' detective/drama series by Caroline
> > Lawrence
> > > The Caius Trilogy by German author Henry Winterfeld: Caius ist ein
> > Dummkopf (Caius is an Idiot); Caius geht ein Licht auf (Caius has an
> > Inspiration), and Caius in der Klemme (Caius in a Fix). The first part
was
> > published in English with the alternate title Detectives in Togas. The
> > second was published in English with the alternate title Mystery of the
> > Roman Ransom.
> > > The Third Princess: A Septimus Severus Quistus Roman Mystery by Philip
> > Boast
> > > Rubies of the Viper (2010) by Martha Marks. A Roman woman sets out to
> > uncover the identity of her brother's murderer
> > >
> > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> > >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]





[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 82979 From: C.Maria Caeca Date: 2011-01-31
Subject: Re: Roman fiction
Salvete!

Unfortunately ...I'm not sufficiently familiar with the new crop of stars and such, so my choices would be ...a bit dated. But who *would* play who? Certainly scope enough there for a galaxy of talent!

Valete,
Caeca
----- Original Message -----
From: Lyn
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Monday, January 31, 2011 8:38 PM
Subject: RE: [Nova-Roma] Re: Roman fiction



Ave Caeca,

Okay, who'll play whom? Go on, then.

Vale bene,

LAM

_____

From: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com [mailto:Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf
Of C.Maria Caeca
Sent: Monday, January 31, 2011 5:43 PM
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: Roman fiction

Caeca Mamerca Sal!

Oh, most definitely!!!!!!! In fact, that should be ...somebody's next
project!

Vale Bene!

Caeca, deciding who should play who ...
----- Original Message -----
From: Lyn
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com <mailto:Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Monday, January 31, 2011 1:48 PM
Subject: RE: [Nova-Roma] Re: Roman fiction

Salve,

I've never understood why McCullough's (Rome) books haven't been turned into
films, or at least Masterpiece Theatre-type programs. And I'll bet C. Maria
Caeca would agree.

:-)

Vale,
L. Aemilia Mamerca

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com <mailto:Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com>
[mailto:Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com <mailto:Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com> ] On
> Behalf Of Robert Woolwine
> Sent: Monday, January 31, 2011 1:37 PM
> To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com <mailto:Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com>
> Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: Roman fiction
>
> Ave!
>
> They already made the Thornbirds into a movie! ;)
>
> On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 11:35 AM, Gaius <gaiuspopillius@...
<mailto:gaiuspopillius%40gmail.com> > wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > Salve amice,
> >
> > What about Colleen McCullogh's books? What a great movie of two they
would
> > make.
> >
> > Laenas
> >
> >
> > --- In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com <mailto:Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com>
<Nova-Roma%40yahoogroups.com>,
> Timothy or
> > Stephen Gallagher <spqr753@...> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > Salvete
> > >
> > > With so much Roman fiction to draw on why have none of the leading
series
> > ever made it to the small or big screen?
> > >
> > > Valete
> > >
> > > Paulinus
> > >
> > >
> > > The Roma Sub Rosa series (1991-2005) by Steven Saylor, starts with
Roman
> > Blood (1991); the books cover the period 80 BC to 48 BC.
> > > The Marcus Didius Falco series by Lindsey Davis, starts with The
Silver
> > Pigs; set in the reign of Vespasian.
> > > The SPQR series by John Maddox Roberts.
> > > The I, Claudia series of novels by Marilyn Todd featuring her
picaresque
> > heroine Claudia Seferius
> > > The Publius Aurelius series by Danila Comastri Montanari
> > > The Marcus Corvinus series by David Wishart
> > > Roman Justice: SPQR: Too Roman To Handle, by Anne Hart
> > > The Roman Mysteries young adults' detective/drama series by Caroline
> > Lawrence
> > > The Caius Trilogy by German author Henry Winterfeld: Caius ist ein
> > Dummkopf (Caius is an Idiot); Caius geht ein Licht auf (Caius has an
> > Inspiration), and Caius in der Klemme (Caius in a Fix). The first part
was
> > published in English with the alternate title Detectives in Togas. The
> > second was published in English with the alternate title Mystery of the
> > Roman Ransom.
> > > The Third Princess: A Septimus Severus Quistus Roman Mystery by Philip
> > Boast
> > > Rubies of the Viper (2010) by Martha Marks. A Roman woman sets out to
> > uncover the identity of her brother's murderer
> > >
> > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> > >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]





[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]