Tribunus Plebis C. Aemilius Crassus Quiritibus SPD,
Senate Voting Results published on February 3.
The Senate has finished its latest session and the votes have been tallied
as below.
Formal debate began at sunrise Roman time Saturday January 22.
Voting began at 7.29 Roman time Wednesday January 26.
Voting ended at 17.20 Roman time Saturday January 29.
Results were officially published by the presiding magistrate on the Senate
list on January 30.
The following 17 Senators cast votes in time. They are referred to by their
initials, which are listed in alphabetical order:
*ATS: Aula Tullia Scholastica
*CEC: Gaius Equitius Cato
*CFD: Caius Flavius Diocletianus
*CPD: Gaius Petronius Dexter
*CPL: Gaius Popillius Laenas
*CVA: Gaius Vipsanius Agrippa
*CnIC: Gnaeus Iulius Caesar
*DIPI: Decius Iunius Palladius Invictus
*KFBM: Caeso Fabius Buteo Modianus
*LCSF: Lucius Cornelius Sulla Felix
*MIP: Marcus Iulius Perusianus
*PMA: Publius Memmius Albucius
*PUSV: Publius Ullerius Stephanus Venator
*QFM: Quintus Fabius Maximus
*QSP: Quintus Suetonius Paulinus
*TiGP: Tiberius Galerius Paulinus
*TIS: Titus Iulius Sabinus
The following Senator informed the presiding magistrate that his absence of
vote was due to unexpected health and informatics problems.
*MMA: Marcus Minucius Audens
The following 4 Senators did not cast a vote:
*ECF: Emilia Curia Finnica
*MAM: Marcus Arminius Maior
*MCC: Marcus Curiatius Complutensis
*MLA: Marcus Lucretius Agricola
“UTI ROGAS” indicates a vote in favour of an item, “ANTIQUO” is a vote
against, and “ABSTINEO” is an expressed abstention.
Item VI - Discussion of the Status of "The Eagle" was removed by Consul Cato
and postpone for future session.
The items for consideration were as follows
Agenda
Item I: Appointment of a CFO
“1. By this senatus consultum, the Senate hereby defines the position of
Chief
Financial Officer (herein designated as "CFO"). An individual shall be
appointed to the position of CFO by senatus consultum, passing by no less
than a
two-thirds majority vote, for a term specified by the same, but in no case
longer than thirty-six months.
2. An individual appointed to, and accepting of, the position of CFO,
shall be given access to all financial data and accounts, including
but not limited to the deposit, credit, and brokerage accounts of the
corporation and its associated entities, and all access methods
thereto, as well as the surface mail directed to Nova Roma, Inc.
3. The CFO shall report directly to the co-presidents of Nova Roma, or in
their
absence, the co-vice presidents, and through them, to the Board of
Directors.
4. The CFO shall have the ability to appoint and dismiss assistants as it
sees
fit, not to exceed four individuals, who shall be treated as under direct
appointment by the Board of Directors. For their
service, these individuals shall receive an amount of century points
equal to those of regularly appointed scribae.
5. An incoming CFO shall be appointed to a term so as to overlap that of an
outgoing CFO by three months, during which time the incoming CFO
shall co-operate with the outgoing CFO to ensure smooth transition of
necessary access to records and operations as outlined elsewhere in
this and relevant consulta. An incoming CFO, during this three-month
period, shall also assess the financial status and performance of the
corporation and report the same to the Board of Directors, and
complete and analysis of the financial results of the corporation and
develop recommendations for future measures.
6. An individual accepting appointment to the position of CFO may hold no
other
position within Nova Roma, as defined and allowed for by Section II.B. of
the
Lex Vedia Centuriata (or any such legislation as replaces the same),
excepting a
seat as Senator. Standing for office by a sitting CFO shall be understood as
the announcement of resignation, to be effective on the starting date of the
position for which the individual is standing. Such a resignation will still
be
effective even if the individual does not come to hold the office.
7. In the event of a vacancy in the position of CFO, the consuls shall
have the authority to appoint, from the appointed assistants to the
previous CFO, a CFO "pro tempore", for a term to last no longer than
six months from the date of appointment. By the end of that time, the
Board of Directors must appoint a new CFO, to serve the remainder of
the previous incomplete term, or if less than six months remain of
that term, to start a new term.
8. The CFO shall have overall responsibility for the financial data of
Nova Roma and its associated entities, and shall oversee all financial
operations of the organisation, including, butn not limited to: those
undertaken by those individuals elected by the comitia, those
undertaken by the provinciae and their subsidiaries, those undertaken
by the sodalitates, and those undertaken by the sacerdotes publici as
appointed by the Senate, Collegium Pontificum, or other body so
empowered.
9. The CFO shall be responsible for the development and recommendation of
financial protocols to ensure proper compliance with laws and regulations,
both
inside and outside Nova Roma, shall be responsible for the monitoring of
internal financial controls and procedures, and shall produce financial
reports
to be provided to the Board of Directors at such frequency as required by
Nova
Roman law.
10. The CFO shall maintain financial oversight of all accounting
practises, budget and cash management, oversight of debt financing,
and shall undertake those administrative tasks related to maintaining
the financial welfare of the corporation.
11. The CFO shall also oversee budgetary planning, make recommendations for
budgetary measures, represent the organization to the financial community,
work
with the officers and other elected and appointed individuals to ensure
operational success and compliance, minimize potential risks to the
organization, and oversee business insurance
plans.
12. The Senate of Nova hereby appoints Lucius Cornelius Sulla Felix as CFO
of
Nova Roma, Inc.”
UTI ROGAS: 11
ANTIQUO: 1
ABSTINEO: 5
The result of voting is Item I PASSED
*CEC: UTI ROGAS
*CnIC: UTI ROGAS
*LCSF: I do have one comment on the Item 1 (The CFO appointment) as a
general rule I would always abstain in items that would involve myself. In
this item I make an exception for two specific reasons. First the
importance of the position I felt required my vote. Secondly, my request to
the consuls in regards to this item was such that I felt that I would need
the overwhelming support of the senate as a sign of confidence in my ability
to do the job justice. That is why I asked both consuls for a 2/3 majority
vote on this agenda item. UTI ROGAS
*CPL: UTI ROGAS
*QSP: UTI ROGAS
*CVA: UTI ROGAS
*TiGP: UTI ROGAS
*CFD: UTI ROGAS
*PUSV: UTI ROGAS
*PMA: I have obliged to ask informations about the documents etc., that were
kept by our former CFO, Eq. Iunia Laeca, and that it had not been considered
important enough to give the Senate, spontaneously, a full information on
this situation, so important for Nova Roma.I have been also surprised that
the information came from Censorius Sulla, then not yet a candidate for CFO,
and not from the consul(s), who should represent Nova Roma on this matter
and defend his proposals.I am willing to bring my support to the consuls on
this important field, but from the moment the Senate will be clearly
confirmed by our consuls/co-presidents, towards the Curia/board in session,
that the whole package of infos until then kept by Iunia is now under
control and under their responsibility, or at least its key elements (basic
books, check books, and other codes). I have well recorded the candidacy of
Censorius Sulla and am ready to give him my sincere and full support.For the
moment, I will therefore take the opportunity that, contrary to what
provides the proposed § 1 of the sc, no precise length is proposed for the
appointment of the CFO in article 12 of the proposed SC, and refrain voting
(NO PROPOSAL ==> NO VOTE). This statement works, naturally, under Nova Roma
internal laws as in the frame of the incorporation law.
*QFM: I much as I like L. Cornelius Sulla I believe putting our finances in
the hands of one person is asking for trouble. Look at what the illness of
the former CFO did to our republic?
I believe the more people involved i.e, the Quaestors, the less chance
something untowards will occur.
Therefore, until more then one person is involved. ANTIQUO
*MIP: ABSTINEO
*KFBM: I would like to comment on the CFO position. I do agree with Q.
Fabius Maximus that I do not like this being in the hands of one person and
think our quaestores should have this task. I would recommend, as I have
said before, that we establish two quaestores that are elected for two year
terms similar to the censores who act as joint CFOs. This way our financial
officers are elected magistrates and have some continuity. Also, I think
these quaestores should be of the senatorial class. UTI ROGAS
*CPD: ABSTINEO
*ATS:
*DIuPI: As a stopgap measure, yes, though we definitely need to revisit this
position. UTI ROGAS
*TIS: No proposal – no vote.
Item II: Creation of a panel to recommend action regarding the leges
Saliciae
UTI ROGAS: 12
ANTIQUO: 0
ABSTINEO: 5
The result of voting is Item II PASSED
*CEC: UTI ROGAS
*CnIC: UTI ROGAS
*LCSF: UTI ROGAS
*CPL: UTI ROGAS
*QSP: UTI ROGAS
*CVA: UTI ROGAS
*TiGP: UTI ROGAS
*CFD: UTI ROGAS
*PUSV: UTI ROGAS
*PMA: If I am not wrong, I did not see any written contents under this
title, submitted either during the discussion, or for the vote. As only the
contents of a legal text produces a legal binding force, and not its title,
I understand that, in this absence of contents, there is no proposal for the
vote. No information has been given on the consular motivations, the kind
and composition of this “panel”.NO PROPOSAL ==> NO VOTE.
*QFM: This was very vague. I assume you mean "recommending how best to
replace the leges Salicae"
We all ready know what action needs to be taken. It needs to be replaced.
What we are going to replace it with, there is where a concilium would be
useful.
In that case: UTI ROGAS
*MIP: If I am not wrong, I did not see any written contents under this title
as well. I can'vote so I abstain. ABSTINEO
*KFBM: UTI ROGAS
*CPD: What do you exactly recommend? ABSTINEO
*ATS: May I inquire just what action is contemplated? There is no text.
ABSTINEO
*DIuPI: I agree with Albucius, this is kind of putting the cart before the
horse, as a more specific proposal for a panel should have been presented.
This essentially asks whether we should have a panel. To which I respond,
"sure," "uti rogas," but wait for something more concrete later. UTI ROGAS
*TIS: No proposal – no vote.
Item III: SCU to allow voting in the comitia centuriata regarding the repeal
of the sententiae against L. Equitius Cincinnatus Augur
SENATUS CONSULTUM ULTIMUM RE: VOTING/ELECTORAL PROCEDURES
1. In accordance with Section V.E of the Constitution of Nova Roma, the
Senate
enacts this Senatus consultum ultimum.
2. The consuls are authorized to override, by consular edicta, those
sections of
the Constitution and leges of Nova Roma that deal directly or indirectly
with
the calling of any comitia to vote upon legislative proposals or to conduct
elections, in order that such comitia calls may proceed without recourse to
the
cista software tools.
3. The scope of the authority at (2) above shall be limited only to
overriding
those sections of the Constitution and leges which would otherwise make the
conduct of comitia business impossible or in the opinion of the consuls
unnecessarily complicated and time consuming without recourse to the cista
software tools.
4. This Senatus consultum ultimum shall expire no later than pridie Kalendas
Ianuarius 2765 AUC (December 31st 2011) or upon the recovery of the cista
software tools in full working order and fully operable by the magistrates
and
their staff normally concerned with the conduct of comitia calls and votes,
whichever event shall occur first.
UTI ROGAS: 13
ANTIQUO: 0
ABSTINEO: 4
The result of voting is Item III PASSED
*CEC: UTI ROGAS
*CnIC: UTI ROGAS
*LCSF: UTI ROGAS
*CPL: UTI ROGAS
*QSP: UTI ROGAS
*CVA: UTI ROGAS
*TiGP: UTI ROGAS
*CFD: UTI ROGAS
*PUSV: UTI ROGAS
*PMA: If I am not wrong, I did not see any written contents under this
title, submitted either during the discussion, or for the vote. As only the
contents of a legal text produces a legal binding force, and not its title,
I understand that, in this absence of contents, there is no proposal for the
vote. No information has been given on the need of a SCU, nor the reason to
invite the comitia to repeal the Equitian judicial sentence. NO PROPOSAL ==>
NO VOTE.
*QFM: I am assuming that the Consuls believes that the sentence against L.
Equitius was too harsh and they request that it be overturned through
an appeal to the Century assembly.
Actually since IMO the "trial" was extra ordinem and had nothing to do with
the L. Salica an Edictum would overturn it by the Consul's use of exercito
iudicii publici, just as the former Consul Moravius used it to convict.
If that is the case I do agree and vote UTI ROGAS
*MIP: ABSTINEO
*KFBM: UTI ROGAS
*CPD: ABSTINEO
*ATS: Uti rogas, though I thought that there was only one sententia.
Again, there is no text. That means that the validity of this item may be
called into question. UTI ROGAS
*DIuPI: An injustice long overdue to be overturned. This should go to a
comitia ASAP. UTI ROGAS
*TIS: No proposal – no vote.
Item IV: Approval of an SCU allowing the appointments of quaestores
“SENATUS CONSULTUM ULTIMAM REGARDING THE APPOINTMENT OF QUAESTORS
1. This Senatus consultum ultimum is issued under the authority of
Section V.E of the Constitution of Nova Roma.
2. The election for quaestors held in 2763 left seven positions vacant
due to a lack of candidates.
3. Section IV.A of the Constitution is unsuitable to deal with that
situation at (2) due to it referring to vacancies "mid-term", whereas
these positions were never filled to begin with. Section III.A.1 Lex
Fabia de ratione comitiorum populi tributorum requires the presiding
magistrate of the elections where vacancies occurred to call for a
follow up election from unsuccessful candidates. The presiding officer
is no longer in office and there were no unsuccessful candidates. The
Constitution and law therefore do not address the current situation.
4. In recognition of the current lack of cista software, the complex
and time consuming alternative electoral process, the lack of
unsuccessful candidates, the uncertainty of sufficient candidates
becoming available in one election call and the Constitution and law
being silent on this specific situation, this Senatus Consultum
Ultimum authorises the Consuls to directly appoint to the office of
Quaestor such persons as are subsequently identified as both willing
to serve in that capacity and who meet the requirements of the Lex
Iunia de magistratuum aetate, the Lex Vedia de cursu honorum, the Lex
Cornelia Iunia de definitione intervallorum magistratuum and the Lex
Salicia de prorogatione et cumulatione. Such appointments shall be
made by consular edicta under the authority of this Senatus consultum
ultimum.
5. This Senatus consultum ultimum shall expire no later than Kalendiis
Septembribus 2764 AUC (1 September AD 2011) or upon the recovery of the
cista
software tools in full working order and fully operable by the magistrates
and
their staff normally concerned with the conduct of comitia calls and votes,
whichever event shall occur first.”
UTI ROGAS: 11
ANTIQUO: 4
ABSTINEO: 2
The result of voting is Item IV PASSED
*CEC: UTI ROGAS
*CnIC: UTI ROGAS
*LCSF: UTI ROGAS
*CPL: UTI ROGAS
*QSP: UTI ROGAS
*CVA: UTI ROGAS
*TiGP: UTI ROGAS
*CFD: UTI ROGAS
*PUSV: UTI ROGAS
*PMA: As no updated version of the text has been issued, I suppose that my
recommendations to limit in time this SCU have not been considered as
appropriate.
I would have been ready to support a SCU that would have left our consuls
the time to organize an election by electronic way like in last November,
and that they could have made profitable with the addition of several legal
proposals. The normal working of our institutions cannot, neither last year
nor now, depend on the technical work to be done on our IT system.
We have now two working consuls, a renewed Senate, a renewed Collegium
Pontificum and no more conspirators who intend to take the control of the
Republic illegally. Let us come back to a normal way, and use our SCU for
limited periods, the time for us, in such cases, to organize elections.
As a consequence, my vote will be, with sincere regret : ANTIQUO
*QFM: If this was actually Republican Rome, the Senate would appoint a
dictator to oversee the elections. He would conduct them and then resign.
This does not IMO rise to the level of an SCU. Let's organize elections,
like last winter through a SC. The less use of a SCU here in NR, the
better.
Therefore my vote will be ANTIQUO
*MIP: ABSTINEO
*KFBM: UTI ROGAS
*CPD: I would prefer quaestores elected than appointed.
Elections must be hold. ANTIQUO
*ATS: I prefer elections, but not like the past ones. With extreme
reservations, UTI ROGAS
*DIuPI: ABSTINEO
*TIS: I prefer a way to lesser the quaestores number and then elections.
ANTIQUO
Item V: SC on activities in Provincia Sarmatia
“SENATUS CONSULTUM REGARDING PROVINCIA SARMATIA
1. The governor and citizens of the Nova Roman province of Sarmatia is
instructed to forthwith terminate all fund raising activity, all
disbursement of money or any other financial activity conducted in the
name of the province of Sarmatia or in the name of Nova Roma, or on
behalf of Sodalitas proDIIS or any other activity, project, entity or
person(s).
2. The governor of the Nova Roman province of Sarmatia or his
successor(s) or designates is/are instructed to prepare a full
accounting of all assets, donations or payments of monies received
together any other income and all expenditures from the date of the
formation of the province onwards, together with a full list of any
and all bank accounts, PayPal accounts, or any other account used for
the
collection, storage or distribution of money that it has raised or
otherwise acquired.
3. The governor of the Nova Roman province of Sarmatia or his
successor(s) or designates will remit the full accounting required at
(2) above to the Consuls of Nova Roma within 30 (thirty) days of the
passing of this Senatus Consultum.
4. The Consuls shall by consular edictum specify the form that
accounting and provision of information as required at (2) shall take
and may amend that form by subsequent edicta, as well as further
define by consular edictum details of any other items, information or
action required that they deem necessary to provide full and
comprehensive disclosure by the Nova Roman province of Sarmatia of its
activities.
5. The Consuls are empowered to determine whether, based on the
information received, or as a result of the failure to provide any or
all of the information required by this Senatus Consultum or under
Consular edictum, the Nova Roman province of Sarmatia should be placed
under direct control and administration of the Consuls, which if they
so determine shall be made effective by the issuance of a Consular
edict to that effect.”
UTI ROGAS: 12
ANTIQUO: 3
ABSTINEO: 2
The result of voting is Item V PASSED
*CEC: UTI ROGAS
*CnIC: UTI ROGAS
*LCSF: UTI ROGAS
*CPL: UTI ROGAS
*QSP: UTI ROGAS
*CVA: UTI ROGAS
*TiGP: UTI ROGAS
*CFD: UTI ROGAS
*PUSV: UTI ROGAS
*PMA: As no updated version of the text has been issued, I suppose that my
recommendations have not been considered as appropriate.
One of the points on which we still need to progress is our good knowledge
of every constitutional Powers' field.
Here, our consuls do not need a senatus consultum, for, in the present
circumstance, Sarmatia has no governor. They just have to use their higher
imperium to take the interim lead of Provincia Sarmatia, to state what
happens there, to report the Curia, and afterwards, if necessary, to request
from the Curia the authorization to go on ruling Sarmatia, specially to
obtain a prorogation beyond pr. Kal. Apriles.
Second, this proposal apparently aims to deal with the relations between
Sarmatia and the Sodalitas ProDiis. But it does not say it and do not
explain the reasons why Sarmatia would be, specially and as a whole, a
matter of suspicion.
Last, the proposed text aims “the governor of the Nova Roma province of
Sarmatia” who is, currently... no one, since the resignation of former leg.
p.p. Octavius Corvus.
So, on this not necessary and legally not applicable text, my vote is :
ANTIQUO.
*QFM: What a mess. But with Corvus gone we have to reorganize. As for a
Temple that is supposed to be in Rome, now transplanted to Sarmatia
let's close the book on this situation. UTI ROGAS
*MIP: ABSTINEO
*KFBM: UTI ROGAS
*CPD: UTI ROGAS
*ATS: And this concerns...a nonexistent governor? And the exact text is?
ANTIQUO
*DIuPI: ABSTINEO
*TIS: No need for that. ANTIQUO
Item VII: Age exemption for C. Cocceius Spinula
“SENATUS CONSULTUM REGARDING AN AGE EXEMPTION
In view of lex Iunia de Magistratuum aetate, paragraph IV and VI, the Senate
of
Rome decides that G. Cocceius Spinula is granted an exemption of age, which
allows him to enter, if elected or appointed, the public magistracy of
quaestor
before he has reached the age of 21.”
UTI ROGAS: 15
ANTIQUO: 2
ABSTINEO: 0
The result of voting is Item VII PASSED
*CEC: UTI ROGAS
*CnIC: UTI ROGAS
*LCSF: UTI ROGAS
*CPL: UTI ROGAS
*QSP: UTI ROGAS
*CVA: UTI ROGAS
*TiGP: UTI ROGAS
*CFD: UTI ROGAS
*PUSV: UTI ROGAS
*PMA: Harassment seems to come back in fashion : we have already voted two
months ago on this request, and it was rejected. Nothing has changed since
last Nov. 19 : Cocceius is still a worthy and working citizen, but his
birthday has not moved : still next July 6th. I expect that, as a real
Roman, he be patient enough.
As I have always told my reluctance to accept exemptions of any kind, my
position has, therefore, not changed. Moreover, as I do not appreciate being
requested to vote on this same item, I will oppose this exemption. If our
consul wishes to record my vote, it will thus be antiquo.
But this possible vote will have no legal consequences for, beside the
Senate's vote, the agreement of both censors is required. ANTIQUO
*QFM: Put Spinula to work. But as Censor Memmius points out, it is a
symbolic vote unless he changes his mind. UTI ROGAS
*MIP: UTI ROGAS
*KFBM: UTI ROGAS
*CPD: UTI ROGAS
*ATS: Most of us (indeed, nearly all of us, if memory serves) agreed to this
last time around. It is time to let this highly energetic young man run for
the magistracy he seeks especially since we are short of candidates.
Several others seeking various posts have been exempted for a few monthsÂ’
difference in their ages from that specified in the law; there is nothing
new about this. UTI ROGAS
*DIuPI: ANTIQUO
*TIS: Maybe my colleague censor will understand that we live that time when
is not good option to reject the good voluntary work, especially when the
applicant demonstrated that. UTI ROGAS
Item VIII: SC regarding dissolution of MMP
“THE MAGNA MATER PROJECT PROPOSED SENATUS CONSULTUM
1. All previously issued Senatus consulta in respect of the Magna Mater
Project
(also known as the MMP) are rescinded.
2. The Magna Mater Project is terminated forthwith.
3. The Consuls are directed to either directly and/or by delegation to a
team of
their own choice, to refund all identifiable donations made to the Magna
Mater
Project to such donors as can be identified, traced and communicated with.
Such
refunds should be made by PayPal or if that service is not used by a donor
by
cheque drawn upon the Nova Roman bank account.
4. The Senate directs that such funds that cannot be refunded as at (3)
shall
before December 31st 2011, be transferred to a separate bank account in
order
not to co-mingle funds. The senate authorises the creation of a PayPal
account
linked to this separate bank account now or at such time in the future as it
may
be required to process refunds to donors.
5. The Senate directs that such funds that are transferred as at (4) shall
not
be used for any purpose and shall be maintained until and if unidentified
donors
are subsequently identified, traced and communicated with and their
donations
refunded, until such point as the funds transferred at (4) are exhausted and
the
bank account able to be closed.
6. The Senate directs that copies of the Magna Mater Project website files
be
obtained and stored on the same server as the Nova Roman website/wiki is
hosted
upon, now or in the future.
7. The Senate directs that the Consuls shall first arrange that the content
of
any article referring to the Magna Mater Project on the Nova Roman website
wiki
shall be copied into text files and stored within the records of the Senate
list
and also as text files on the same server as the Nova Roman website/wiki.
Subsequent to such copying being done, the Senate directs that the Consuls
shall
have all references to the Magna Mater Project deleted from the Nova Roman
website/wiki.
8. The Senate directs that any work upon the Magna Mater Project, apart from
that specified in this Senatus consultum, shall cease immediately and no
further
action or work be taken upon or in support of the Magna Mater Project.”
UTI ROGAS: 14
ANTIQUO: 3
ABSTINEO: 0
The result of voting is Item VIII PASSED
*CEC: UTI ROGAS
*CnIC: UTI ROGAS
*LCSF: UTI ROGAS
*CPL: UTI ROGAS
*QSP: UTI ROGAS
*CVA: UTI ROGAS
*TiGP: UTI ROGAS
*CFD: UTI ROGAS
*PUSV: UTI ROGAS
*PMA: Uti rogas, for I am convinced that our organization has not the
necessary skills or enough (political) will to deal with such a project,
which would need a steady Project team over years, and whose legitimacy
would not be at stake every year. Let us being honest with ourselves and
close this Project.
I recommend our Consuls and their assistants to :
find the best words to explain our donors why we were not able to implement
the program voted initially or modified three years ago ;
ask our collegium pontificum to have a piaculum organized, which would
associate the Senate and the major magistrates present in our walls, to
confirm the Magna Mater that our decision must not be as a mark of lack of
respect towards her. UTI ROGAS
*QFM: Finally. My lawyer will be pleased. About returning the money, those
who wish it applied to NR's treasury will have to express that wish in
writing. UTI ROGAS
*MIP: It's a real pity that NR found no way of developing this project which
was at the very beginning a real way of be considered seriuosly by the
Italian public administration. I've spent days and money in the very first
steps, believed in it, exposed myself with University scholars, filmed
documentaries in the ruins, visited the temple three or four times.... all
is lost thank to NR bureocracts, people who dwell here only to criticize,
people who see cospiracy and fraud everywhere.
For what was once the MMP (the name I gave to the project), its website (the
domain I took control on behalf of NR), all that time and money wasted, I
vote ANTIQVO.
*KFBM: UTI ROGAS
*CPD: ANTIQUO
*ATS: Again with reservations, but it is clear that the original plan cannot
be realized. I hope that the secondary one concerning the bench and
reflection area or whatever will be reconsidered. UTI ROGAS
*DIuPI: UTI ROGAS
*TIS: I understand the Senator Perusianus' points, I lived them, and, with
regret I must say that NR is not able to sustain, develop or adapt any
complex project whatever the project is. ANTIQUO
Item IX: SC regarding Sodalitas proDIIS
“SENATUS CONSULTUM REGARDING SODALITAS PRODIIS
Senatus consultum - Suspension of activity - Sodalitas proDIIS
1. The governing authority (Collegium) of proDIIS and Sodalitas
proDIIS is instructed to forthwith terminate all activity other than
that necessary to fulfill the requirements of this Senatus Consultum
and is specifically forbidden to engage in any further fund raising
activity.
2. The governing authority (Collegium) of proDIIS is instructed to
prepare a full accounting of all assets, donations or payments of
monies received together any other income and all expenditures from
December 3rd 2262 onwards, together with a full list of any and all
bank accounts, PayPal accounts, or any other account used for the
collection, storage or distribution of money that it has raised or
otherwise acquired.
3. The governing authority (Collegium) of proDIIS will remit the full
accounting required at (2) above to the Consuls of Nova Roma within 30
(thirty) days of the passing of this Senatus Consultum
4. The Consuls shall by consular edictum specify the form that
accounting and provision of information as required at (2) shall take
and may amend that form by subsequent edicta, as well as further
define by consular edictum details of any other items, information or
action required that they deem necessary to provide full and
comprehensive disclosure by proDIIS of its activities.”
UTI ROGAS: 12
ANTIQUO: 3
ABSTINEO: 2
The result of voting is Item IX PASSED
*CEC: UTI ROGAS
*CnIC: UTI ROGAS
*LCSF: UTI ROGAS
*CPL: UTI ROGAS
*QSP: UTI ROGAS
*CVA: UTI ROGAS
*TiGP: UTI ROGAS
*CFD: UTI ROGAS
*PUSV: UTI ROGAS
*PMA: As no updated version of the text has been issued, I suppose that my
recommendations have not been considered as appropriate.
I am conscious that the poor writing of the SC of Dec., 2762, whose only
legally binding decision is to make of this sodalitas “an officially
promoted project and sodalitas of Nova Roma”, strongly reduces our legal
basis. I am also ready to believe that the working framework, goals and
means of the sodalitas ProDiis should be discussed again with it.
But, in such situation, the consuls should have first written the sodalitas
and ask its head(s) to produce the Senate reports and information ; for :
either our previous SC allow them to, and they do not need the present
proposal, or it does not, and they need to propose a new working frame
between the Republic and the sodalitas, what could have done have been the
subject of the present SC.
Last, in the present legal frame, both Novaroman or national one, our
Republic/corporation has no legal means to oblige a group whose status is,
in addition, not well defined by our own rules (see lex Cassia) to abide any
of our “instruction(s)”.
If my heart would invite me to abstain, the seriousness and dignitas of our
Senate bring me to vote, with sincere regret : ANTIQUO.
*QFM: We are in no postion to build any type of temple in the near future.
For the time being NR has no business in the temple building business. UTI
ROGAS
*MIP: ABSTINEO
*KFBM: UTI ROGAS
*CPD: UTI ROGAS
*ATS: Well, to me quibbling about where a temple is to be built is less
important than that it is to be built. If the donations are not being
diverted, but are being used for a temple in Sarmatia, non sollicitor. It
is a matter of procedure. The probability of any temple being built in Rome
seems about as likely as that I will be chosen by NASA to lead an FTL flight
to P Cen. ANTIQUO
*DIuPI: ABSTINEO
*TIS: There is not any communication with the Sodalitas to fix things but an
abrupt decision to end it. The same: with regret I must say that NR is not
able to sustain, develop or adapt any complex project whatever the project
is. ANTIQUO
Di vos incolumes custodiant.
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
|